Slashdot Mirror


WWDC '08 Sees Slimmer, Improved, 3G iPhone

Many of us have been watching Apple's WWDC 2008 keynote unfold live. There are many exciting tidbits, but most of all is the announcement of the 3G iPhone. Featuring an even thinner profile, black plastic back, metal buttons, flush headphone jack, improved audio, GPS support, and improved battery life, this is bound to make quite a few people stand up and take notice. Update 18:54 GMT by SM: Best of all it looks like they really took the price point to heart, 8GB iPhones are now $199 and a 16GB model will be available for $299, coming to an Apple store riot near you on July 11,2008.

804 comments

  1. Already? by norminator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know people are excited about it and all, but I would think that we'd wait at least until Steve is done talking about the 3G iPhone on the stage before posting this on Slashdot... Digg is for posting announcements before they're even done announcing them. I'm pretty sure there's still some features that haven't been covered yet...

    1. Re:Already? by SilentGhost · · Score: 1

      why can't you wait just two minutes? he left the stage

    2. Re:Already? by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Wait, isn't Slashdot a place where people go on about the usefulness of the Internet for things like instant communication and dissemination of information?

      Sorry, I'll get off your lawn now.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:Already? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you think that's bad, a local radio station just reported on the announcement of these new iPhones.

      With everything they could be reporting on you'd think there would be something more newsworthy. People come to sites like Slashdot to read about this sort of thing, but to have a news service report on a product release is a bit ridiculous.

      I'm sure Apple's marketing department is ecstatic over all this free advertising. I can only imagine how daunting it must be for potential competitors of all sizes. The bigger companies have to spend a fortune to get even a fraction of the attention Apple gets. And for the small guys it's hopeless.

      There are a lot of great phones out there that aren't getting the attention they deserve, although the great ones are available predominantly overseas. I'm not discounting the iPhone, it's very good, but I do think it's overrated. In the very least undeserving of all the attention its getting. You can't read a review anymore that doesn't try to compare a phone, especially smart phones, against the iPhone.

      The best part is when Apple trumpets a standard feature as something new and revolutionary.

    4. Re:Already? by socz · · Score: 1

      yeah you're right it's hard for others to advertise, so i just thought of something evil!

      How about if instead spending 100% of their budget for advertising on advertising, they spend 80% of that money buying iphones right. And then they break them, not scratching or screens, but software-wise. Maybe bricking them.

      THEN they give them away through promotional avenues, and so when thousands of people have "bad iphones" that apple won't repair, that'll make news and then BAM! The small guys have a chance for competition?

      As long as no one gets caught, could it work? hahaha

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    5. Re:Already? by costas · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I've been waiting for a proper iPhone to replace my N95. The specs from the keynote don't answer some basic questions:
      • Are the GPS maps stored or downloaded ad-hoc? because for those of us that actually travel and use GPS in foreign lands, paying 3G roaming rates isn't exactly a bargain.
      • OK, MobileMe sounds great, but what about Bluetooth syncing? again, if you are traveling, you can't rely on getting a WiFi signal between your phone and your laptop to sync your calendar (and you don't want to have to remember to plug it into USB either).
      • What about that camera? still 2MP, in 2008? AutoFocus, anything?


      The iPhone has an awesome screen and a great UI, but even this fixed version will probably fall again short of the N9x series outside of the US, where ppl don't usually have wide-spread WiFi, or unlimited 3G access, or care about PC syncing. Pity, here's waiting for WWDC 2009 again...
    6. Re:Already? by Kelbear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple gets a great economy of scale for it's market presence. Significance is subjective some degree, if enough people care about this "not news", then it becomes "news" simply by popular demand. It's silly, maybe even wrong, but it'll continue to be the case nonetheless.

      It's news simply because the audience cares. Genocide in Darfur has a much more profound effect on human lives, political stability, moral substance, but in the end while I might disapprove of it, I don't /really/ care about it. It is more worthy of my attention in macro-level terms, but I live life in a micro-cosm, and if I'm honest with myself, I care much more about iPhone 2.0. If the genocide in Darfur's effects ever reverberate far enough to affect me personally, I may not even be able to recognize it. However, I got an iPod Touch for a present 3 weeks ago(My first apple product). Now suddenly the iPhone 2.0 is relevant because now I'm interested in having the additional features of an iPhone, and if I get one, it will see use in my day to day life, which makes it much more important to me than reading about a disaster in a far away land.

    7. Re:Already? by olafva · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sounds like you don't have an iPhone and have nothing to base your opinion on. I have an iPhone, Blackberry, Tmobile, Sony Erikkson and Nokia, and I can tell you the iPhone leads the way and nothing can even come near it. It deserves the Invention of the Year Award it received from Time.
      BTW it's easy to unlock (one click on ziphone.com) and easy to
      use with WIFI as a phone WITHOUT A CONTRACT using fring.com
      That's my current iPhone, and the new 3G iPhone is an even better bargain (with GPS & 3G) that will revolutionize the cellular and even commnications industry which is why it deserves all the press it is getting. IT'S DEFINITELY A BREAKTHROUGH!

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    8. Re:Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How's that new Tmobile? I've always liked the Verizon, but have been wanting to check out a Tmobile. I hear the new Sprints are awesome too, but a shame they discontinued the popular Nextels.

    9. Re:Already? by prockcore · · Score: 2, Informative

      the new iphone requires a contract to buy. you can't buy them from apple anymore.

      Also, jailbreak won't work on the new iphone.. so there goes all of your selling points.

    10. Re:Already? by olafva · · Score: 1

      ziphone.org that is (FREE)

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    11. Re:Already? by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are a lot of great phones out there that aren't getting the attention they deserve,

      What? How does a product "deserve" attention? Anyway, why can't these companies try to build a "buzz" and a cool "corporate image" so they can get the kind of coverage that Apple gets? It's not exactly Apple's fault that other companies have about as much style and savvy as a discarded wrist watch.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    12. Re:Already? by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "the new iphone requires a contract to buy. you can't buy them from apple anymore."

      Care to document this?

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    13. Re:Already? by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      Nevermind. From Apple's web site:

      "iPhone 3G is coming soon to an Apple Retail Store near you. Meet with a Specialist, ask questions, and get to know iPhone 3G firsthand."

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    14. Re:Already? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are the GPS maps stored or downloaded ad-hoc? because for those of us that actually travel and use GPS in foreign lands, paying 3G roaming rates isn't exactly a bargain.

      The built in maps probably would not cache. In the case of travel, you'd probably be more likely to purchase one of the several thousand stand-alone GPS apps that will eventually appear on the app store that do come with datasets or allow you to download them.

      OK, MobileMe sounds great, but what about Bluetooth syncing? again, if you are traveling, you can't rely on getting a WiFi signal between your phone and your laptop to sync your calendar (and you don't want to have to remember to plug it into USB either).

      USB sync would be how you'd do things if you were without any WiFi. If you are someone so remote you have no WiFi, why are you constantly updating your calendar anyway?

      What about that camera? still 2MP, in 2008? AutoFocus, anything?

      The camera is the price you pay for keeping the phone price really low. There are way better standalone cameras than any cell-phone camera, if you care about image quality...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    15. Re:Already? by rakslice · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that Wi-Fi is unreliable, and as an alternative you want... Bluetooth? I don't get it.

    16. Re:Already? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "OK, MobileMe sounds great, but what about Bluetooth syncing? again, if you are traveling, you can't rely on getting a WiFi signal between your phone and your laptop to sync your calendar (and you don't want to have to remember to plug it into USB either)."

      I'm guessing that bluetooth tethering to your laptop is still verboten too....

      I'd really like to have to have that just for emergencies when I need to do stuff off the laptop while on the road somewhere.....sure came in handy during the past few hurricane evacuations.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Already? by Chrononium · · Score: 1

      If MobileMe is simply a (much-improved) replacement for .Mac, then iSync/iTunes will probably work just fine. Certainly for a Mac, Bluetooth syncing should be a breeze (since this phone is obviously supported).

    18. Re:Already? by olafva · · Score: 1

      Contract NOT REQUIRED at Apple Store or Online

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    19. Re:Already? by olafva · · Score: 1

      Again, NO CONTRACT REQUIRED unless you buy your iPhone somewhere other than an Apple Store. You can walk out of the Apple Store with your $199 iPhone with NO CONTRACT just as you always could do (as I did).

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    20. Re:Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been waiting for a proper iPhone to replace my N95. The specs from the keynote don't answer some basic questions:
      • Are the GPS maps stored or downloaded ad-hoc? because for those of us that actually travel and use GPS in foreign lands, paying 3G roaming rates isn't exactly a bargain.
      • OK, MobileMe sounds great, but what about Bluetooth syncing? again, if you are traveling, you can't rely on getting a WiFi signal between your phone and your laptop to sync your calendar (and you don't want to have to remember to plug it into USB either).
      • What about that camera? still 2MP, in 2008? AutoFocus, anything?


      The iPhone has an awesome screen and a great UI, but even this fixed version will probably fall again short of the N9x series outside of the US, where ppl don't usually have wide-spread WiFi, or unlimited 3G access, or care about PC syncing. Pity, here's waiting for WWDC 2009 again... What people care about their camera phone? My N95 has 5mp, and it takes crap photos. It's no replacement for a real camera. And it's not a selling point for most people.

      Most people want a phone that works, and if it's an iPod + web browsing = win.
    21. Re:Already? by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with wifi? You don't need a router to communicate between your laptop and an iPhone, it only takes a few seconds to set up an ad-hoc network on OS X, I assume windows is similar.

  2. Biggest news is... by Glock27 · · Score: 3, Informative

    3G 8 GB iPhone at $199!!!

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    1. Re:Biggest news is... by norminator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My question is how does that affect the price of the other iPods, especially the Nano and the Touch... I guess that will probably be answered in the next couple of minutes... Hopefully, anyway. Maybe it just means larger Nanos at the same price point, and reduced prices on the Touches.

    2. Re:Biggest news is... by twitchingbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would think the phone contract is enough to dissuade people. There are already people out there that would've bought gen1 except for a) the carrier b) existing phone contracts.

    3. Re:Biggest news is... by fermion · · Score: 1

      I suppose they are counting on kickbacks from the two year contract with the cell phone company to generate profits. That is fine, I guess. Only problem is that it keeps people from upgrading the phone. If I have to sign up for another two years, it is unlikely I will upgrading for a long time.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Biggest news is... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      My question is how does that affect the price of the other iPods, especially the Nano and the Touch
      Repeat after me: the iPhone is a phone, not an iPod.

      Completely different markets. I doubt that the price of the iPhone will have any bearing on what Apple decides for the Nano. Maybe the Touch -- but only because it's built from the same components. But my real guess is the Touch is going to stay where it's at.

    5. Re:Biggest news is... by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The question is, can you walk into the store and get an iPhone for this price, without having to sign a 2 year contract.

      The reason the iPhone originally cost so much more than we're used to seeing phones cost, is because it was not subsidized by a 2 year service contract.

      Now that they've lowered the price, can I still walk into the Apple store and buy a new iPhone and walk out without signing a contract.

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    6. Re:Biggest news is... by keytoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      The 8GB iPod Touch is currently listed at $299 on the store. SWEET DEAL!

    7. Re:Biggest news is... by papna · · Score: 1

      The iPhone wasn't unsubsidised by contracts when it first came out. Yes, you could walk into the store, buy an iPhone, and walk out, no strings attached. However, Apple and AT&T knew what you were going to do with it and counted on that when pricing their products.

    8. Re:Biggest news is... by norminator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, it looks like he didn't have any announcements about prices on iPods, and according to the Apple Store, they're still all the same. But the iPhone was always described as "The best iPod [Apple] has ever made," among other things...

      And now, for $199, you can buy an 8GB 3G iPhone, which is a pretty sweet iPod plus a phone, internet connectivity, 3rd party apps, or you can buy an 8GB nano, which is just an iPod with a tiny screen and a wheel. I understand that this new iPhone price may be subsidized by the carriers, and that it probably locks a customer into the 2 year contract even more than they were with the old iPhone, but still, there's something about seeing these prices on the website that just doesn't sit right. Not to mention that the 8GB iPhone is now $100 less expensive than the 8GB iPod Touch, which has less hardware built into it... (by the way, does the Touch get GPS, too?).

      I'm still expecting either price cuts or big storage increases on the Flash-based iPods. In any case, if I were in the market for a new iPod, I'd wait a little longer before I buy.

    9. Re:Biggest news is... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like the lower price comes from carrier subsidy. They're no longer available to buy direct from the online Apple Store. You have to do it in a brick and mortar store, or on the O2 or Carphone Warehouse websites (which haven't been updated yet, Boo-urns), which I suspect means signing up for a contract before you get your hands on one.

      Still no word on UK pricing either.

    10. Re:Biggest news is... by _Hiro_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      8GB Touch $299.

      8GB iPhone $199 + $59.99 * 24 = $1638.76

      I think the touch is the better deal. :P

      --
      -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
    11. Re:Biggest news is... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      But the iPod Touch doesn't need to be activated, unlike the iPhone. Not that it will matter after a week, but still...

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    12. Re:Biggest news is... by _Hiro_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the Apple Store, it lists "2-Year AT&T Wireless Contract" as one of the system requirements, right next to iTunes.

      http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_iphone/family/iphone?mco=MTE2NTQ

      --
      -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
    13. Re:Biggest news is... by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative

      iPhone + jailbreak = iPod touch with GPS at $100 discount.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    14. Re:Biggest news is... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      iPhone + jailbreak = iPod touch with GPS at $100 discount.
      iPhone + jailbreak == next software update bricks your "discounted" iPod. Not to mention, it's probably a violation of the DMCA.

    15. Re:Biggest news is... by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When the iPhone was release, the iPhone contracts with AT&T were cheaper than their other smartphone (voice & data) contracts by about $10-15/month. That translates into something like $250+ over the course of a 2 year agreement, which is about the same as the $200 higher price for the iPhone compared to the subsidized smartphones available from AT&T.

      It may not have been explicitly stated, but coupled with the fact that you didn't have to sign a contract to walk out with the phone, it pretty much adds up to it not being subsidized.

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    16. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    17. Re:Biggest news is... by GarfBond · · Score: 1

      Uh, the iPhone most certainly was subsidized by a 2 year service contract, which is why on AT&T a 2-year contract is required. It may not have been fully subsidized up front, but it was subsidized in some way through the use of revenue sharing agreements with Apple and the carriers.

    18. Re:Biggest news is... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Funny

      3G 8 GB iPhone at $199!!!

      True, but the AT&T contract involves the mortgaging of at least one gonad.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    19. Re:Biggest news is... by gyranthir · · Score: 1

      Yea the fact that they didn't mention anything about a price cut leaves me a little leery about this. I understand the phone company probably subsidizes the phone, but seems like too big of a change to be just subsidization.

      Time to wait for an update from apple.

    20. Re:Biggest news is... by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I understand that this new iPhone price may be subsidized by the carriers
      Since when has there been more than one carrier of the iPhone in the US? And what makes you think the iPhone will be subsidizied? It's always been the full price of the phone PLUS the contract.
    21. Re:Biggest news is... by keytoe · · Score: 1

      But the iPod Touch doesn't need to be activated, unlike the iPhone. Not that it will matter after a week, but still...

      True - but you also don't have to pay ten bucks a pop for firmware upgrades for the iPhone ;)

    22. Re:Biggest news is... by T-Bone-T · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The iPhone is carried in more than just the US. It is also about to be carried all over the world.

    23. Re:Biggest news is... by fracai · · Score: 1

      right, instead of 10 or 20 bucks maybe twice a year for software upgrades, you only have to pay $60 bucks a month for at least 2 years to get those upgrades FOR FREE!!!!

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    24. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the DMCA is actually mentioned as doing something wrong when it harms apple. You guys make me sick. You guys will strip DRM off of a music file quicker than it takes to listen to it or use DeCSS to rip DVDs from Netflix until there's no tomorrow but someone decides they want to hack the iphone and "oh noes it's wrong because it breaks the DMCA".

    25. Re:Biggest news is... by samkass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Besides, the jailbreaks have all depended on buffer overrun bugs in the OS. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that Apple paid a LOT of attention to those bugs for the 2.0's firmware. It's probably going to be harder to jailbreak.

      It also looks like it will be a lot harder to buy one without signing a contract up-front.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    26. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a fucking touch for 300 bucks.

    27. Re:Biggest news is... by keytoe · · Score: 1

      right, instead of 10 or 20 bucks maybe twice a year for software upgrades, you only have to pay $60 bucks a month for at least 2 years to get those upgrades FOR FREE!!!!

      Don't be a dolt. $60/month is for the voice and unlimited data service - and without even considering the phone, it's a good deal.

    28. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're too dumb to wait for the new firmware to be hacked, you probably shouldn't be jailbreaking your phone in the first place.

    29. Re:Biggest news is... by Sancho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It depends upon whether you also want a device to make phone calls, send text messages, check e-mail, and use the web. If so, $1638.76 for two years of connectivity and an iPod is not all that expensive.

    30. Re:Biggest news is... by darjen · · Score: 1

      Compared to other unlimited data plans, it probably is a good deal. But I would still rather not pay $60/month for unlimited data, I just don't need it that much.

    31. Re:Biggest news is... by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The question is, can you walk into the store and get an iPhone for this price, without having to sign a 2 year contract.

      Now that they've lowered the price, can I still walk into the Apple store and buy a new iPhone and walk out without signing a contract. I'm not sure if you're thinking about buying the iPhone without a contract and "just using the iPod" functions, but you cannot do this. You may be able to hack it, but Apple will probably make it a hassle. From Ars Technica's review of the original iPhone:
      • "The first thing you have to do once you take the iPhone out of its box is turn it on and activate it. No part of the iPhone's functionality--including that of the iPod--is accessible until the phone is activated through an AT&T plan (without hacking)."
      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    32. Re:Biggest news is... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Technically you don't have to ever register your phone with AT&T if you want to just use it as a video iPod.

    33. Re:Biggest news is... by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The iPhone is carried in more than just the US.
      No kidding, huh? Maybe that's why I put _in the US_ ?
    34. Re:Biggest news is... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      So the DMCA is actually mentioned as doing something wrong when it harms apple. You guys make me sick. You guys will strip DRM off of a music file quicker than it takes to listen to it or use DeCSS to rip DVDs from Netflix until there's no tomorrow but someone decides they want to hack the iphone and "oh noes it's wrong because it breaks the DMCA"
      Who said it was wrong? I said it was illegal. I'd advise the same of someone who wants to strip DRM off of a music file or use DeCSS: it's illegal. Whether or it's right or wrong is a matter for your own conscience and ethics.

      I don't like the DMCA anymore than the next guy, but the DMCA is a fact, and we've got to live with it, good or bad, until or unless it ever gets repealed in some sort of copyright reform legislation.

    35. Re:Biggest news is... by STrinity · · Score: 1

      8GB Touch $299.

      8GB iPhone $199 + $59.99 * 24 = $1638.76
      That's if you want the iPhone as a phone. But the iPhone without a contract is the same as a Touch, but a hundred bucks less. Unless Apple is imposing a restriction that you can't buy the new iPhone without signing up for a contract.
      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    36. Re:Biggest news is... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      The 8GB iPod Touch is currently listed at $299 on the store. SWEET DEAL!

      Certainly, but there probably isn't a three year contract signed in blood for the iPod Touch ;)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    37. Re:Biggest news is... by T-Bone-T · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The person you replied to wasn't talking about only US carriers so your statement doesn't make sense.

    38. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet, every development release (including 2.0) has been jailbroken.

    39. Re:Biggest news is... by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Moot point since none of the providers have subsidized the phone's price. (AFAIK)

    40. Re:Biggest news is... by c_forq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Notice not you have to buy the phone from Apple or AT&T stores (not the Apple website), and in the fine print is states "with a two year contract". No more buying an iPhone and not activating it, that is where the cheaper price comes from. Since iPods won't be subsidized by AT&T I highly doubt the price will change unless the price for Apple to manufacture them drastically decreases.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    41. Re:Biggest news is... by phuul · · Score: 1

      Since the actual contract sign up is done through iTunes how is buying from a brick and mortar Apple Store different than buying it off the Apple Store online? My guess is that it will be available online, but only after the initial "iPhone3G Rush" has passed.

    42. Re:Biggest news is... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Notice now you have to buy it in a store (not online), and have to get a two year contract. What good is jailbreaking when you still have to pay AT&T for two years?

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    43. Re:Biggest news is... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      I don't that will be the case anymore, as now you have to buy it from a brick and mortar store (can't get it from the Apple web store).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    44. Re:Biggest news is... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      iPhone + jailbreak = iPod touch with GPS at $100 discount. Except that in order to offer the subsidy, they'll register the phone (thus nailing you to the contract) before you walk out the store with it.
    45. Re:Biggest news is... by Homer1946 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jailbreaking didn't (for most involved users) "brick" the phone. Some unlocked phones were bricked (a step beyond jailbreaking) but phones that were just jailbroken were not harmed (and almost all or almost all bricked phones were later recovered). The biggest problem is that updates undo the jailbreak. However the solution is just to disable automatic updates in iTunes and wait to install an update until each new update can be jailbroken. It is not a big deal. Also, it looks like Apple Stores will restore "bricked" phones by restoring them to the normal firmware (they have signs to that effect in the stores ).

    46. Re:Biggest news is... by jimicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's if you want the iPhone as a phone. But the iPhone without a contract is the same as a Touch, but a hundred bucks less. Unless Apple is imposing a restriction that you can't buy the new iPhone without signing up for a contract. The $100 less probably comes from the network subsidising the phone. (What, you thought those "free phones" you saw advertised were free to manufacture?)

      And if the network is subsidising the phone, there's no way you're walking out the store without the contract set up and the phone registered to it.
    47. Re:Biggest news is... by T-Bone-T · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why didn't you say that in the beginning instead of being a smartass?

    48. Re:Biggest news is... by weston · · Score: 1

      I think the touch is the better deal. :P

      Unless you're doing an end run around the AT&T contract (failing the credit check, going the prepaid route, jailbreaking the phone).

      Or, alternatively,if you were going to be paying for a cell phone + data plan anyway...

      ,

    49. Re:Biggest news is... by SeePage87 · · Score: 1

      You could always get a buddy who does have an iphone to buy one for you and give you the other one. And I'm sure ebay will be flooded with them. Not to mention you probably can still activate it via itunes at home if you bought it at a brick and mortar apple store.

    50. Re:Biggest news is... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I thought you had to activate it when you got it home, regardless. (If you wanted to use it as a phone, that is).

    51. Re:Biggest news is... by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      That, of course, assumes you don't already pay a comparable amount for a cell phone service plan, and doesn't include nationwide 3G data. For me, the comparison would be with a Windows Mobile or Blackberry device-- and considering the subsidized price of those tends to start at $150, the iPhone is now extremely competitive with both.

    52. Re:Biggest news is... by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you say that in the beginning instead of being a smartass?

      And what makes you think the iPhone will be subsidizied? It's always been the full price of the phone PLUS the contract.
      Do you need help getting off your horse?
    53. Re:Biggest news is... by LarsG · · Score: 1

      almost all bricked phones were later recovered

      We lost the original meaning of hacker due to journalists failing to understand (or deliberately ignoring) the difference between hacker and cracker.

      I'll be damned if I let the iCrowd do the same to "bricked". A device that can be recovered is not bricked! Oh, and don't get me started on "jailbreak".

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    54. Re:Biggest news is... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

      by the way, does the Touch get GPS, too?
      Not likely, since that's a feature of the cellular radio chipset.
    55. Re:Biggest news is... by olafva · · Score: 0

      Which you can do (in a WIFI area) WITH NO CONTRACT on a $199 3G iPhone using fring.com once you've clicked "Do it all" on ziphone.com I've done it and just spent 2 months in Europe on business with my iPhone with a TMobile card and even w/o it making Skype calls in WIFI areas.

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    56. Re:Biggest news is... by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      For $60/mo, you get a full blown data plan at a fairly high speed (3G is smooth). Oh, you also get regular cell service.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    57. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8GB Touch $299.

      8GB iPhone $199 + $59.99 * 24 = $1638.76

      I think the touch is the better deal. :P Well, if you have a cell phone already, and are paying a monthly fee, the $60/month may be something you're shelling out already. If you don't have a phone, then yes, the math makes sense.

    58. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this insightful, this assumes you don't pay for a cellphone already.

    59. Re:Biggest news is... by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's great for you. Most of the places where I'd want to use data on my phone, there isn't wifi.

    60. Re:Biggest news is... by Homer1946 · · Score: 1

      Yes, however I am responding to the fact that many phones initially claimed to be bricked (and described as such) were later recovered (i.e. not bricked), and that those there were either actually bricked, or initially reported as bricked, were generally unlocked and not just jailbroken. As for jailbroken, that is the term that is being used and everyone understands the meaning in this context.

    61. Re:Biggest news is... by EmotionToilet · · Score: 1
      8GB iPhone $200 + ($60 * 24) = $1640

      Compared to:

      8GB iPod Touch $300

      New phone $50 (with 2 year agreement)

      Phone Plan $50 * 24 = $1080

      Total Cost: $1430

      I think this is a more accurate representation of what it would be like to own an iPod Touch and a phone instead of just an iPhone. It is still slightly cheaper by about $200, but you have to deal with the inconvenience of carrying around 2 devices, not being able to access the internet on your Touch wherever you are, paying $10 to $20 for updates on your Touch every few months, and missing out on certain things that only the iPhone would have such as the txt messaging, and the phone app, which I actually like a lot. If you have a smartphone and an iPod Touch your total cost will be somewhere around $1900. Overall, the iPhone carries a unique experience that the iPod Touch and other phones can not mimic, and it will do it at a very competitive and attractive price.

    62. Re:Biggest news is... by mblase · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the 8GB iPhone is now $100 less expensive than the 8GB iPod Touch, which has less hardware built into it... (by the way, does the Touch get GPS, too?). Doubtless it will, but expect a few months' wait so that iPhone sales don't suffer too much.
    63. Re:Biggest news is... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      GPS is a completely different signal from GSM and uses satellites rather than phone base stations. They might have both on the same chip, but then they might also have bluetooth and wifi on it.

    64. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not $59.99 anymore, they raised the price for 3G data plans by $10, so it's $69.99 x 24... meaning the new phones aren't cheaper at all, they are $39 more expensive ($199 + $240 = $439). Lame.

    65. Re:Biggest news is... by olafva · · Score: 1

      ziphone.org that is (FREE)

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    66. Re:Biggest news is... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a loophole where you could drop AT&T's contract within 3 days with no penalty and keep the phone, since it's not subsidized?

    67. Re:Biggest news is... by mr_matticus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An unnecessary loophole, given that you could just pick one off the shelf and buy it.

      Now, it appears as though you will not be able to purchase one without (a) signing up for a new AT&T account or (b) proving the existence of a current iPhone account you will be upgrading to. Since the new iPhone is pretty clearly subsidized, dropping the contract would require return of the iPhone.

    68. Re:Biggest news is... by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Sure there is. Worldwide pricing is $199 US. So, for you, that's about £100.

    69. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overall, the iPhone carries a unique experience that the iPod Touch and other phones can not mimic, and it will do it at a very competitive and attractive price.


      There is no magic in Apple products... there are already knockoffs and such for the iPhone and anything successful in the market will curve other products towards it.
    70. Re:Biggest news is... by 54mc · · Score: 1

      There's gotta be some kind of change of price or capacity that they haven't announced yet. As it stands, the new 3G iphone will cost just as much as the ipod nano with similar capacity. I will cost $100 LESS than the ipod touch with similar capacity. Than again, it is apple we're talking about, they can get sheeple to buy anything at any price.

      --
      Joy! Beautiful spark of the gods!
    71. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean
      8GB iPhone $199 + ($59.99 * 24) = $1638.76

    72. Re:Biggest news is... by Cattus+Curiosus · · Score: 1

      Of course, if your current wireless plan is already $49.99, the math becomes:

      8GB iPhone $199 + $10 * 24 = $439

      --
      Snowclone is the new clich
    73. Re:Biggest news is... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Except you can't, because you HAVE TO SIGN THE CONTRACT to get the $199 iPhone.

      No contract, no phone.

    74. Re:Biggest news is... by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

      GPS is a completely different signal from GSM and uses satellites rather than phone base stations.
      Welcome to the wonderful world of A-GPS. Cool when you have unlimited data, a sneaky way for the cell company to pad your bill when you forget to turn it off if you don't.
      --
      Notmysig
    75. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and how much for : the Touch + the cheapest 3G phone + the cheapest 2-year contract with data ?

    76. Re:Biggest news is... by schnell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My question is how does that affect the price of the other iPods, especially the Nano and the Touch.

      It shouldn't affect the price at all. Apple isn't really cutting the price on these devices, the wireless carriers in those 22 countries are. Before, Apple wanted every carrier to fork over $$$ each month for each subscriber. That meant that the wireless carriers couldn't afford to BOTH pay Apple and discount the phones like they normally would ... so the phones were sold unsubsidized (or subsidized very lightly).

      Now Apple isn't asking for revenue sharing ... or maybe they did but the carriers around the world finally had the clout to tell them to cut it out. Either way, you're now seeing the benefits of the carrier subsidies - that service plan you're signing up for allows the lower upfront price. Apple still gets its cash for the hardware, the customers get a cheaper device ... everyone is theoretically happy. But that's also why you won't see a price dip on the other iPods, because there's no service provider to pay down the cost for you.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    77. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you don't pay anything for mobile phone service right now?

    78. Re:Biggest news is... by futuresheep · · Score: 1

      8GB iPhone $200 + ($60 * 24) = $1640

      Compared to:

      8GB iPod Touch $300

      New phone $50 (with 2 year agreement)

      Phone Plan $50 * 24 = $1080

      Total Cost: $1430

      I think this is a more accurate representation of what it would be like to own an iPod Touch and a phone instead of just an iPhone. It is still slightly cheaper by about $200, but you have to deal with the inconvenience of carrying around 2 devices, not being able to access the internet on your Touch wherever you are, paying $10 to $20 for updates on your Touch every few months, and missing out on certain things that only the iPhone would have such as the txt messaging, and the phone app, which I actually like a lot. If you have a smartphone and an iPod Touch your total cost will be somewhere around $1900. Overall, the iPhone carries a unique experience that the iPod Touch and other phones can not mimic, and it will do it at a very competitive and attractive price.

      8GB iPhone $200 + ($60 * 24) = $1640

      Compared to:

      8GB iPod Touch $300

      New phone $50 (with 2 year agreement)

      Phone Plan $50 * 24 = $1080

      Total Cost: $1430

      I think this is a more accurate representation of what it would be like to own an iPod Touch and a phone instead of just an iPhone. It is still slightly cheaper by about $200, but you have to deal with the inconvenience of carrying around 2 devices, not being able to access the internet on your Touch wherever you are, paying $10 to $20 for updates on your Touch every few months, and missing out on certain things that only the iPhone would have such as the txt messaging, and the phone app, which I actually like a lot. If you have a smartphone and an iPod Touch your total cost will be somewhere around $1900. Overall, the iPhone carries a unique experience that the iPod Touch and other phones can not mimic, and it will do it at a very competitive and attractive price.

      The only problem with this comparison is that a $50.00 phone most likely won't give you the same number of minutes and the unlimited data that the iphone plan will. I actually saved about $15.00/month switching from a blackjack to an iphone.
    79. Re:Biggest news is... by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Word on the street is that the iPhone Dev Team already have a working 2.0 unlock (based on the beta) - and are holding on to it until the product ships, to avoid having the bug patched pre-ship.

      That being said, word on the street also says neither AT&T nor Apple will let you out the store until your contract is signed. This means effectively no unlocking is possible (or at least, meaningful).

    80. Re:Biggest news is... by EmotionToilet · · Score: 1

      It's not intended to have a data plan. In the cell phone + iPod Touch scenario you would use your iPod Touch to surf the web and look up stuff through WiFi. Unfortunately WiFi isn't everywhere you go, and it's not always free. I just wanted to illustrate that trying to have an iPod Touch and cell phone can be just as expensive as having just an iPhone, and it doesn't have many of the conveniences of the iPhone.

    81. Re:Biggest news is... by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      I don't need any help but the mod that wasted all his points on us does.

    82. Re:Biggest news is... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

      They *might* have any number of things on one chip, but most new cell phone chipsets have AGPS at least partially to support the E-911 mandate.

    83. Re:Biggest news is... by Lershac · · Score: 1

      but over the two year contract its $40 more expensive than your $399 iphone!!! What if I WANT to minimize my monthly out of pocket... and pay for the whole thing up front?

      This lack of option has left a really bad taste in my mouth. :(

      --
      Chuck
    84. Re:Biggest news is... by Lershac · · Score: 1

      not 59.99 try 69.99... add another $240 to your total... and guess what? THE NEW PHONE IS MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE OLD!

      Trickery and lies.

      --
      Chuck
    85. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's probably subsidised for new subscribers only. They will also need to offer the phone unsubsidised for those of us who are already on the same network but want to replace our current handsets, and that's when we find out the actual cost of the phone. It's just a matter of time really.

    86. Re:Biggest news is... by savuporo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Yes, HTC Touch is always a better deal than anything with an apple on it, regardless of the price.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    87. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $67 bucks to make calls and browse the web? Meh.

    88. Re:Biggest news is... by magnamous · · Score: 1

      There is a law in California, I believe, that allows you to get out of any signed contract within 3 days of signing the contract. Couldn't one just buy an iPhone, sign the contract, and then come back the next day and cancel the contract?

      (This does nothing for people living in states that don't have such a law, but I'm just saying...)

    89. Re:Biggest news is... by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact I believe AT&T themselves give you a grace period to terminate a contract... But that would also involve *giving the phone back* :)

    90. Re:Biggest news is... by tokul · · Score: 1

      3G 8 GB iPhone at $199!!!
      And it is still locked.
    91. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole 59.95*24 is the most ridiculously stupid thing I keep hearing. The iPhone is targeting people who want a cell phone. It is targeting people who want a cell phone that uses a data plan for things like e-mail. Show me the cell phone you get from AT&T, or any other carrier, that isn't locked, doesn't require a two year contract, and has some mythical cheaper plan that provides the same service?

      Did it ever occur to you that a large chunk of the 59.99 * 24 is going to the infrastructure cost of the cell network and has 100% nothing to do with the hardware your using?

      To talk to people like you one might be under the impression that things like cell service are some magical free entity. Perhaps the cell towers grow like trees or something.

    92. Re:Biggest news is... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that if you do so, you'll be required to return the phone, because it was supplied to you at a subsidized price based on your acceptance of the contract. And rightly so.

    93. Re:Biggest news is... by olafva · · Score: 1

      NO CONTRACT REQUIRED at an Apple Store or apple.com

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    94. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you're already paying for a phone...

    95. Re:Biggest news is... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Where did the "$59.99 * 24 = $1638.76" come from? I only spend about $50 a year on my pre-paid Vodafone plan. Unless they plan to restrict the iPhone to a certain plan or something, which won't go down as well in many countries where SIM cards and GSM are the norm.

    96. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, coincidentally, am in the market for an iPod Touch. It's odd that he's developing the iPhone, but there's ne'er a mention of the iPod Touch. I suspect that the Touch might be getting the axe. Why upgrade one of the pair and not take the other with it? Sure, the two pieces of equipment aren't identical, but they're still rather linked...

    97. Re:Biggest news is... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ultimately the Touch is dead as a product unless there's some real price cutting happening this month.

      O2 just announced that the iphone will be available on Pay and Go in the UK. If we're to take Steve's words literally ($199 maximum price everywhere) it'll be priced at the same as the contract price - £99 (O2 have only announced their contract rates.. Free iphones on higher contracts!).

      So I can buy an 8GB ipod touch for £179, or an 8GB PayG iphone for £99 - and the iphone has GPS, 2.0 software for free.

      Can't see many people buying the more expensive product.

    98. Re:Biggest news is... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It'll be available on pay and go in lots of countries, just invalidating the argument somewhat.. if you don't need the phone bit, don't top it up - end of problem. iPhone ends up costing half the price of the touch (in the UK at least).

    99. Re:Biggest news is... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      UK pricing: http://www.o2.co.uk/iphone

      *very* competative.

    100. Re:Biggest news is... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw that this morning. I'm glad to see they've got a slightly cheaper tariff for those buying it for data usage, which would be good for users who are frequently in WiFi coverage and plan to use VoIP (which Jobs has said will be allowed over WiFi). It would make the price of the unlimited text bolt-on just that little bit more palatable too...

      What I'd really have liked is something like T-Mobile's Flext, which I'm on right now, where you get an allowance and you can use it on calls and texts, to suit your usage.

    101. Re:Biggest news is... by _Hiro_ · · Score: 1

      That's for the iPhone. The iPhone 3G looks (based on the "requirements" and some of the other fine print) to REQUIRE a 2-year AT&T contract to take it out the door.

      --
      -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
    102. Re:Biggest news is... by _Hiro_ · · Score: 1

      Same thing. Thanks to order of operations, the parenthesis are redundant. (Exponent first, then Multiply/Divide, then Sum/Subtract.)

      --
      -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
    103. Re:Biggest news is... by _Hiro_ · · Score: 1

      Or if you've had bad service from AT&T in the past and feel giving them the money is pure loss.

      --
      -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
    104. Re:Biggest news is... by _Hiro_ · · Score: 1

      The 3G is apparently being saddled for US customers with a 2-year contract with AT&T, the minimum plan of which (for the current iPhone, apparently the 3G is more) is $59.99/month. Until the contract is fulfilled, the phone isn't yours. (And since it's "locked" to the carrier, it never really is afterwards...)

      This counter to the previous iPhone where you bought it outright and could use it as an overpowered Touch or Jailbreak it and use it with a different carrier.

      --
      -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
    105. Re:Biggest news is... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 3G won't be available to buy at:

      iPhone will be available in 8GB (black) and 16GB (black or white) models1 at Apple Retail Stores and AT&T Stores.

      I'd be interested to know what makes you think that they won't sign you up with a contract in an Apple Retail Store.

      Interestingly, the UK website indicates that it won't even be available in Apple Retail Stores.

    106. Re:Biggest news is... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yup, news is out; will have to sign up for contract first to get iPhone 2.0. Looks like it'll be an iPod for me.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    107. Re:Biggest news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8GB Touch $299.

      8GB iPhone $199 + $59.99 * 24 = $1638.76

      I think the touch is the better deal. :P Stop whining, 60$ a month is really cheap for a data plan. If you think otherwise well DUH you do NOT want a smart phone, since you do not want to pay for the usage.

      It's like buying an SUV and bitching about the gas mileage...
    108. Re:Biggest news is... by norminator · · Score: 1

      Since the new iPhone is pretty clearly subsidized, dropping the contract would require return of the iPhone. Would you (could you?) have to return the phone, or would they make you pay an early termination fee if you dropped your contract?
    109. Re:Biggest news is... by fracai · · Score: 1

      Right, just pointing out that it's not such a straight comparison of the two products and the requirements for receiving the update.

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    110. Re:Biggest news is... by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      You'd have to return the phone in the first 30 days.

      Afterward, you'd have to pay the early termination penalty, which in this case would essentially nullify the subsidy. So, in effect, you can still get a new iPhone to unlock by paying $199 + activation + one month of service + $175 cancellation fee.

      This adds up to about $500, so it's doable for those who really want it.

    111. Re:Biggest news is... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe DeCSS is not illegal, being in existence before the DMCA.

      However, distributing copyrighted works is illegal, and has been for long before the DMCA.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  3. YEEEEAH! by BenphemeR · · Score: 1

    $299 for 16GB, now THAT's affordable!

    1. Re:YEEEEAH! by Duncan3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not if you don't ignore the several thousand dollar 2-year contract.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    2. Re:YEEEEAH! by Neko-kun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But does it really matter if you're signing up for a 2-year contract with ATT anyway?

      I ask this only because most of the people I've met with iPhones didn't switch, they were already on AT&T's network.

    3. Re:YEEEEAH! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      $199 for 8 GB, though, intrestingly enough, puts it more in direct competition with much, much lower end phones. Like, say, the Motorola Razor or the LG Envy, which are at a similar price point with probably a tenth of the functionality.

      Maybe Apple has something here that will turn the smartphone market on its ear.

    4. Re:YEEEEAH! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not if you don't ignore the several thousand dollar 2-year contract.

      Several? Lets say you get a normalish plan and with taxes ends up costing you $100/month. So over the course of 2 years you spend $2400. This plan would include something like 900 minutes, unlimited nights/weekends, unlimited data, and 1500 texts. The Sprint everything plan is $99/month and that's before taxes (although it does include unlimited minutes). Can you show me any other cell phone with unlimited data that's cheaper than I've listed here?

    5. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know the availability/pricing of a 3G iPhone without the contract?

    6. Re:YEEEEAH! by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      the standard AT&T iPhone plan is $70/month, which works out to $1680/2 years.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    7. Re:YEEEEAH! by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      To be fair that's a $1440 contract for lots of users in the US. The base rate for cell service, minus data for two years is $720 to $960. The iPhone is an entirely different class of service. In fact I'd say that the mobile phone part is just icing.


      Haha- so as long as I'm gonna have a cell phone, it might as well be an iPhone. I'll pick mine up when I get back from Mozambique in February 2009- maybe MWSF will see another update ;)

    8. Re:YEEEEAH! by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      I was torn between the RAZR2 with its Linux OS and the only slightly more expensive iPhone. This settles the matter. Now I just need to get a job to pay for service.

    9. Re:YEEEEAH! by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Who uses unlimited talk and text anyway? I hardly send texts (e-mails are the norm now and since you can send e-mails to/from most phones (phonenumber@provider.com), only the receiver has to pay for them in case you send texts (instead of both sender and receiver paying for texts). I have a 500 minute phone plan with unlimited nights and weekends (the norm), pay over $70 to Sprint for two lines without anything (the second phone line is 'free' but still adds about $12 in taxes and fees) and hardly use 200 of the 500 daytime minutes.

      I call a heck of a lot more but usually not during business hours. I'll gladly pay AT&T for a way better reception and service (reception of Sprint/Nextel sucks anywhere outside the city even in the suburbs where I live), unlimited data etc. and I'll still fork around the same amount of cash for 2 lines (after 15% employer discount).

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    10. Re:YEEEEAH! by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

      I don't need a "normalish plan". The plan I have costs me <$20, and that's all I need. I'd be willing to pay much more for an iPhone that would work with my current plan, but it doesn't look like that will be an option.

      [shrug] Oh well.

    11. Re:YEEEEAH! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      And your plan has unlimited data for $20/month? Where do I sign up!? I'll switch over my home internet while I'm at it.

    12. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay approx. 55 USD/month with T-mobile for 300 anytime minutes, free weekends, and unlimited data.

    13. Re:YEEEEAH! by agm1101 · · Score: 1

      I believe the sprint SERO plan gives less number of minutes, but unlimited data and text messages.

    14. Re:YEEEEAH! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I had always heard t-mobile has good data plans, but they aren't in my area...

    15. Re:YEEEEAH! by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

      No, my plan doesn't have unlimited data. I don't need unlimited data. I don't even particularly want unlimited data. What part of "I'd like to only pay for the amount and type of service that I use" is so tough to understand?

    16. Re:YEEEEAH! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      the at&t plan I have w/ my iPhone is 60 a month IIRC. Granted, it has only has a modest supply of minutes and text messages, but it does include unlimited data.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    17. Re:YEEEEAH! by abigor · · Score: 1

      I know people who send upward of 50 text messages a day. Not kidding. And lots of people easily - EASILY - go way over 1000 daytime minutes a month.

    18. Re:YEEEEAH! by JosefWells · · Score: 2, Informative

      My SERO plan is 500 min, unlimited night/weekend@7, unlimited data, unlimited text.

      $30/month.

      totally rad.

    19. Re:YEEEEAH! by dcheng.reg · · Score: 1

      I think I'm in this boat. I don't really understand the frustration with the service contract if you already have it. For those of us who have been on AT&T through work or otherwise and have similar plans already (I have a Treo 650 with unlimited data and the 1500 text messages), this is a non-issue. Why all the vitriol for this item? Do most people not have contracts? Granted, I use my plan pretty extensively and get good value out of it, so it works out for me.

    20. Re:YEEEEAH! by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    21. Re:YEEEEAH! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      That's true, but I picked one of the middle of the road plans to show they over 2 years you aren't spending 'several thousand dollars' on cell phone service. They have cheaper plans with less minutes/texts and unlimited data. And IIRC, if you already have a cheap grandfathered plan with ATT you can simply add iphone data for $20/month which isn't a bad deal at all.

    22. Re:YEEEEAH! by yelvington · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile charges me $19.95 for unlimited data. Since my Nokia has Bluetooth, I can access that connection from my laptop and from my N800 Internet Tablet as well. In addition, I get free access to T-Mobile hotspots.

      HOWEVER: The data connection is GPRS/EDGE, which is annoyingly slow much of the time.

      The wifi hotspots are hard to find. Many airports have wifi that includes T-Mobile logins, but it's not T-Mobile access and you have to pay seven to ten dollars an hour extra. Thanks but no thanks.

      (Tip: Find a Delta Crown Room and stand outside. You'll probably be able to connect to T-mobile.)

    23. Re:YEEEEAH! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Well technically ATT is only charging $20/month for unlimited data on the iphone. Not sure if it's still the case, but when the iphone first came out you could keep your older plan and simply add the $20/month for unlimited data if you wanted to.

    24. Re:YEEEEAH! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The reason I got T-Mobile on my phone is because of their data plans. The reason I'm switching when my contract is up is the coverage. Supposedly they can roam through AT&T/Cingular towers, but in practice it doesn't work 90% of the time.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    25. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sprint SERO plan. 500 anytime minutes, unlimited data and unlimited text messaging. $30/mo

    26. Re:YEEEEAH! by RocketScientist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      NEWS FLASH:

      More services cost more money! It's this amazing idea where companies actually want to *gulp* make money so they can pay their employees. Instead of doing it DotCom style and just giving everything away and then going out of business, companies today charge money for services, and then use that money to pay back their investors, pay their employees, and invest in new technology and infrastructure to deliver more services.

      Looked like you needed a little lesson in how money works. See, if you want more, sometimes you actually have to pay for it. You should be more suspicious of companies that give you more *without* asking you to pay anything.

    27. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. http://sprint.com/sero. Enter in savings@sprintemi.com as the reference and you can have unlimited data, text, picture messaging, night and weekends, and 500 minutes for 30 dollars a month (50 dollars for 1250 minutes). Do I get a cookie now?

    28. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the parent wants a phone he can use on HIS plan that he already has?

    29. Re:YEEEEAH! by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding. I have so many roll-over minutes, I don't think I'd ever use them in a lifetime. I guess if I had a 16 year-old daughter things would be different.

    30. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not if you don't ignore the several thousand dollar 2-year contract.

      Several? Lets say you get a normalish plan and with taxes ends up costing you $100/month. So over the course of 2 years you spend $2400. This plan would include something like 900 minutes, unlimited nights/weekends, unlimited data, and 1500 texts. The Sprint everything plan is $99/month and that's before taxes (although it does include unlimited minutes). Can you show me any other cell phone with unlimited data that's cheaper than I've listed here?


      Well Mr. Trump, my cell plan is $9/mo pay as you go with NO contract. And yes as the OP said several thousand... I.E. > $2000

    31. Re:YEEEEAH! by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

      My T-Mobile Dash that the company pays for has unlimited data and it's substantially cheaper. :) But if I could get an unencombered iPhone, I might, if for no other reason than it would be one less thing to carry around. As it is, I'll wait and see what Android can do.

    32. Re:YEEEEAH! by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      So the only problem is... it's Sprint.

      Yuck.
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    33. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us already own phones, and being geeks, I'd say with some kind of data plan too. The phone service is already a sunk cost- unless you don't want a cellphone at all, and then this isn't marketed towards you.

    34. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably on the old Cingular Media Max data plan. For an extra $20 a month added to your account, you can get unlimited data access.

      This data plan is/was intended for regular phones, not smart phones or PDA phones. And no tethering is allowed either. But many users do it anyways. They're just extra careful not to use too much data that might set off some red flags.

    35. Re:YEEEEAH! by Loraque · · Score: 1

      AT&T: Unlimited personal data for $20- On my BB anyway. It would be $35 if I wanted to connect to a BES server, but I don't want to be THAT available for work.

    36. Re:YEEEEAH! by Yosho · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I realize that you're probably being facetious, but take a look at Sprint's SERO plan.

      In a nutshell, if you sign up for a two-year contract through the right avenues, for $30/month you can get 500 minutes, free nights and weekends that start at 7 pm, unlimited in-network calling, unlimited roaming, unlimited text messaging and 3G data, and a few other perks that I don't really use. You can probably also get a pretty hefty chunk off of whatever phone you're planning to buy; I got $350 off of a Mogul.

      For what it's worth, you may not be able to replace your home internet. Tethering is officially not allowed, although I've been connecting my Mogul to my laptop via Bluetooth for mobile 'net access for several months now and nobody seems to have noticed.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    37. Re:YEEEEAH! by anotherone · · Score: 1

      You're going to spend that much for a cell phone contract anyway. What's your point?

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    38. Re:YEEEEAH! by phuul · · Score: 1

      His point was that the iPhone really takes advantage of the data plan. If you don't need the data plan then getting an iPhone is overkill anyway. So wanting to pay more for a phone that you can't use most of the features for on your current plan really doesn't make a whole lot of sense. If you are always around free Wi-Fi then maybe it might be worth it. But in my experience the only places I can guarantee free Wi-Fi are at work or home, places where I already have a computer that can get me any information I want.

    39. Re:YEEEEAH! by konohitowa · · Score: 1

      Not if you don't ignore the several thousand dollar 2-year contract.

      For a low number slashdotter, you really suck at math. Or else you don't know what "several" means.
    40. Re:YEEEEAH! by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Not if you don't ignore the several thousand dollar 2-year contract. If you already pay for similar service from another carrier, you're already paying that much per month. Who cares what carrier its with. Besides, you can get out of the contract with a little bit of creativity or for $200 at worst case. I just don't see this as a valid argument. You don't see people going off on free phones, saying OMFG - it's not free! Its a trap! You have to pay at least $1000 over 2 years for that free phone. No - you don't. Why not? Because the phone is a useless brick without service.
      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    41. Re:YEEEEAH! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Like, say, the Motorola Razor or the LG Envy, which are at a similar price point with probably a tenth of the functionality.

      I'm curious - what list of ten times as many features does the Iphone have?

      (There is also the question of whether the Iphone is still tied into a contract - typically with other phones, you get them free with a contract, or you pay for them and aren't tied to a contract.)

    42. Re:YEEEEAH! by istewart · · Score: 1

      And maybe ignore the discounting of money to net present value at the same time.

    43. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, according to sprint.com/everything you can get the Everything plan without the unlimited minutes:
      450 minutes = $69.99
      900 minutes = $89.99
      Both still include the unlimited messaging, unlimited GPS (maps displayed via cell from a service called TeleNav), unlimited data (not Phone-As-Modem, thats $15 extra), 150 Sirrius radio stations, over 20 TV stations, and other stuff.

      Oh, and my understanding is that unlike GPRS data connections, when on Sprint/Verizon 1x data service (such as using the GPS navigation service) calls can still be received.

    44. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insightful my ass.

      It's not a two year "Just so you can own the iPhone" contract. It's a two year cellular service contract. You're getting Phone Service... you know... for your iPhone.

      That stabbing people in the face over the Internet invention had better not become real, or I'm going to get locked up fast.

    45. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sprint offers unlimited data for $15 a month.

      I have a PPC-6700 that I can use as a modem (in linux no less!) at 3G speeds (> 1Mbps) for $15 unlimited data. I have a 29.99 voice plan to go with it. Total cost for unlimited high-speed web-browsing on my phone plus unlimited modem use is $45 + taxes.

    46. Re:YEEEEAH! by nixwf · · Score: 1

      Reported! ;p Now they'll notice!

    47. Re:YEEEEAH! by prockcore · · Score: 1

      It's $30/month now.. they raised the rates $10 for the iphone2.

    48. Re:YEEEEAH! by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      So why would you want an iPhone then? Just curious - you've basically described your usage as being nothing like typical for iPhone users.

    49. Re:YEEEEAH! by melted · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's for "friends and family of Sprint employees" only.

    50. Re:YEEEEAH! by T-Bone-T · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't really compare functionality using a list of features.

    51. Re:YEEEEAH! by nikanj · · Score: 1

      The plan is only available in Europe :D

    52. Re:YEEEEAH! by ahoehn · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's for "friends and family of Sprint employees" only. Officially, yes, but practically it's open to just about anyone. And the definition of "friends" should be loose enough to allow even the most scrupled among us to get in on the action. I mean, if I go chat up a sales rep at the Sprint store, can't I call him at least some sort of "friend?"

      You can learn just about everything you need to know about the SERO plan over here.

      It's a great plan, but the downside is that you're stuck with Sprint's poor selection of phones. I'm desperately hoping that they get a good Android model or two before the year's out.

      The question this begs is, why doesn't Sprint advertise this plan? Obviously they're managing to make money at this subscription level, so what not advertise it and allow the rest of America to realize that Sprint offers the best value going right now on cell service?
      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    53. Re:YEEEEAH! by ahoehn · · Score: 1

      No. The iPhone's $199 price is carrier subsidized, and the RAZR's price is around $0 when subsidized by the carrier.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    54. Re:YEEEEAH! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      So tell me what this ten times the functionality is?

    55. Re:YEEEEAH! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I saw that. Since there is no 3G in my area I'll be sticking with my 1st gen phone for awhile I think.

    56. Re:YEEEEAH! by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      A figure of speech?

    57. Re:YEEEEAH! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      As I suspected - the Iphone has no better functionality then.

      It's interesting how certain people talk about how Iphone is so much better, but there is a curious silence when anyone asks for actual details.

    58. Re:YEEEEAH! by ipsi · · Score: 1

      I imagine they're much less common outside the US. In New Zealand, for example, I'm quite rare in having a contract. I know one other person who has a contract for non-business reasons (my bosses do, but they use them for work as well). Everyone else is on prepay. It's just better for most people I know. (Plans == not cheap. Cheapest Vodafone is NZ$20/month for 20 mins, 0 texts, 0MB. They get better, but that should give you some idea).

      Also, there's no such thing as "unlimited" data over here, not even on fixed-line broadband. I've got no idea how they're going to sell the iPhone.

    59. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you show me any other cell phone with unlimited data that's cheaper than I've listed here? No, but my post is already +5, Informative. And your post is just "2". And so therefore, I am right, and you are unimportant.

      Welcome to Slashdot!
    60. Re:YEEEEAH! by Lershac · · Score: 1

      I am one of those.

      I send/rec over 100 texts a day, and about 50 emails. I have worn out 2 blackberrys. Yes WORN OUT, and had replaced under warranty because the keyboards had worn out. I have also worn out holster after holster, dragging them in and out of it. Not broken mind you, worn them to the point they no longer function correctly due to using them as intended by the manufacturer.

      I also use about 1500 min a month.

      and I hate, hate, hate, using the phone for any purpose.

      --
      Chuck
    61. Re:YEEEEAH! by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Congrats on your mobile plan.

      So what does all this have to do with an iPhone, exactly?

    62. Re:YEEEEAH! by kabz · · Score: 1

      Heh! Go ahead and stick with your RAZR. It's a great phone!!

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    63. Re:YEEEEAH! by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      The problem that you are seeing but failing to understand is that it is hard to quantify the interface's ease of use. A RAZR has a calculator that probably does the same things as the iPhone calculator but it gets used much less because it is harder to get to and harder to use. I had a regular phone before my iPhone and I rarely used anything outside of SMS/mms and calling because it was a pain in the ass. Now, I use many of the features on my iphone that were also on my old phone simply because they are very easy to access and very easy to use. I probably use 95%of the iphone's features every week. I never used more than half the features of my old phones in a month.

    64. Re:YEEEEAH! by kiwipeso · · Score: 1

      I used to have a plan when I had girlfriends out of town, but I've since switched to prepay just with the thousand texts for ten bucks.
      Apparently there will be an iphone prepay option.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    65. Re:YEEEEAH! by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Finland? :-)

      You can get 3G modem (384kbit/s) for 10 eur per month, 24 month contract.

      I do not know if you want to have your Internet over that (you won't get 384k on busy times).

    66. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sprint SERO plans, though not openly advertised, are available to anyone and are much cheaper depending on the number of minutes per month. $30/month for 500 anytime minutes, unlimited nights and weekends, unlimited text, and unlimited data. Bump it up to $49.99/month for 1250 anytime minutes and the same features.

      Yeah, cheap.

    67. Re:YEEEEAH! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a RAZR, I have a phone that works fine.

      But it's very telling that not a single person can give me a single feature that the Iphone has that other phones don't which leads me to suspect that the claims about it being so much better than all other phones are just FUD.

      I mean, look at the hype over it getting 3G. Welcome to 2002!

      If I were to get a new expensive phone, there are plenty of other smartphones to consider. It's a shame that Slashdot and the media isn't willing to tell us about them, instead giving free advertising to Apple everytime they say something.

    68. Re:YEEEEAH! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      There is nothing about a UI that makes it hard to quantify - you ought to be able to give solid examples ("If I want to do this feature, I do this and this"). A personal anecdote that you were unable to use features does not count, unless you explain why they are more accessible in the Iphone.

      Typically IME it's hard to quantify because the reasons just don't exist (e.g., I remember being in a debate where someone claimed OS X was better because "it did drag and drop better". When pushed for examples, every single example they gave of drag and drop was one that was supported in other operating systems).

      I use a whole range of features on my regular phone, so I guess you must have just got unlucky.

    69. Re:YEEEEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A company subsidized phone with truly unlimited everything, including roaming abroad. *ducks*

    70. Re:YEEEEAH! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      There is nothing about a UI that makes it hard to quantify - you ought to be able to give solid examples ("If I want to do this feature, I do this and this"). A personal anecdote that you were unable to use features does not count, unless you explain why they are more accessible in the Iphone.


      He gave a solid example. (Note, I do not own an iPhone, nor am I likely to buy one within the next 2 years)

      Look, on a RAZR or other similar phone, the calculator app IS a real PITA... you gotta use the phone's keypad, which is decidedly NOT set up to be a calculator keypad.

      The iPhone has a touch screen interface. Note that I don't need to drag out a stylus, either ... it's truly touch screen. And the little itty bitty buttons on most other smartphones are hard to use.

    71. Re:YEEEEAH! by torkus · · Score: 1

      Yep. That'd be me. I think last month i hit somewhere between 4k and 5k. Keeping in mind most chat clients also eat your SMS cap. Unlimited SMS...still stupidly overpriced but I don't pay it anyhow.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    72. Re:YEEEEAH! by torkus · · Score: 1

      That's why I have a BB Curve with TMO. 4-8GB transflash is dirt cheap and plugs right in...oh, and it's got a friggin keyboard :)

      Sorry but the ability to type >>>>>>> fancy interface and an extra 8GB of MP3s for $100

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    73. Re:YEEEEAH! by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      If UI is easy to quantify, please tell me exactly how the iphone's iPod interface is superior to most phones. I want hard numbers. How many units is coverflow worth? How many units is the customizable bar at the bottom of the screen worth? Don't forget the page transitions!

      I used almost the whole range of features on my old phone but I hated it. It was annoying to have to scroll through 5 menus to send someone else a file. The calculator didn't have a memory function. I had to scroll through most of the links on a webpage just to get to the one I wanted. The media player could only play mp3s up to 192kbps and could only have 100 songs in its playlist. The earbuds required a special adapter to fit in the charging plug so I couldn't plug my phone in and listen to music. The phone had tons of features but they were a PITA to use.

    74. Re:YEEEEAH! by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Okay, here's one.

      When replying to text messages, I frequently have to refer to multiple points from the message that I'm replying to, which I can't necessarily remember (or I have to refer to the exact wording). So I have to re-read that message, often multiple times.

      On my Samsung Z560, the process goes like this:

      1. Press 'Back'.
      2. Save to drafts? Press 'Yes'.
      3. Wait two seconds for the 'Saved' dialogue to disappear, or press 'OK'. Because I replied directly to a message, I'm now at the inbox.
      4. Press 'OK' to select the message, which is already highlighted. This is where I read the message.
      5. Press 'Back' to go back to the inbox.
      6. Press 'Back' to go back to the messaging menu.
      7. Press down, and 'OK' to enter Drafts.
      8. Press 'OK' to select the message I was typing.

      This gets old really quickly.

      On the iPhone, the iChat-style interface means I don't have to go anywhere, the most I'll ever need to do is scroll with my finger.

    75. Re:YEEEEAH! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      If UI is easy to quantify, please tell me exactly how the iphone's iPod interface is superior to most phones. I want hard numbers. How many units is coverflow worth? How many units is the customizable bar at the bottom of the screen worth? Don't forget the page transitions!

      Did you mean to reply to me? I'm not the one claiming the Iphone's interface is better than every phone in existence. If I was making that claim of a phone, I would be sure to explain how.

      The calculator didn't have a memory function.

      Mine does. Far more importantly from an everyday UI point of view, it also has copy/paste for text.

      I can also listen to music whilst charging. Sounds like you just got unlucky with a rubbish phone - just pick a better model next time rather than having to spend loads on an Iphone.

    76. Re:YEEEEAH! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      He gave a solid example.

      No he didn't. "Hard to use" is an assertion that needs evidence, it is not evidence that supports the assertion.

      Maybe the RAZR is a rubbish phone, but even if it is, it's not the only phone on the market! There are plenty of phones and smartphones out there, including ones which do touch - the logic of "The RAZR is rubbish, therefore the Iphone is the best" doesn't work.

    77. Re:YEEEEAH! by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      "A personal anecdote that you were unable to use features does not count"

      -So you create an arbitrary rule to exclude someone's opinion so it does not count? It sounds more like you know he has a valid argument and rather than admit it you invalidate his opinion thereby eliminating your need to respond (or realize you can't respond).

      And yes, there are things about a UI that make it hard to quantify. Why is one UI "easier" or "more enjoyable to use"? Sometimes those things are hard to quantify and put into words, but you just know it's true. That happens a lot in life. I like pizza, my favorite color is blue, I like a certain song, I can't quantify WHY I like them, but I do and that all that I need to know.

    78. Re:YEEEEAH! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      So you create an arbitrary rule to exclude someone's opinion so it does not count?

      Because it doesn't explain why it is better. Otherwise someone can easily counter that by claiming they couldn't use the features in the Iphone.

      Do you think "Iphone rules!" "No, Iphone sucks" is a useful discussion to have?

      It sounds more like you know he has a valid argument

      If he has one, I wish he would share it with us.

      And yes, there are things about a UI that make it hard to quantify. Why is one UI "easier" or "more enjoyable to use"? Sometimes those things are hard to quantify and put into words, but you just know it's true. That happens a lot in life. I like pizza, my favorite color is blue

      So the Iphone is only good in the same way that people have favourite foods or colours? Okay, but that's not what people usually mean when they compare technology products. In the real world, when one product is better, it's because there are measurable reasons, and not simply "Well I like the colour blue, and I also like the Iphone". Personally I don't like a particular colour so much that I'll pay loads of money for it...

      But I love this attempt to completely avoid the need to justify a product's worth. Next time there's an article on a non-Apple niche product (e.g., the Amiga articles we sometimes have), and people ask what's so good about it, I'll respond with "It's the best, it just is, no different to me liking the colour blue".

    79. Re:YEEEEAH! by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      I think your logic doesn't work.

      There, now I've invalidated your argument so YOUR opinion doesn't matter. Seems a bit silly when someone does it to you, doesn't it?

    80. Re:YEEEEAH! by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did mean to reply to you. I said it was hard to quantify ease-of-use, you said it isn't hard, I asked you to quantify some simple things and now you are avoiding it. From an everyday point of view, copy/paste isn't really as important as you make it out to be. I haven't had internet access except on my iPhone and I've done just fine without copy/paste. This whole conversation I've been typing on my iPhone.

      Let me refine my calculator arguement. The iPhone's calculator is better because it works just like a real calculator. It may only currently work like a $10 calculator, but it still works like a real calculator. Very few phones have calculators that work as well and even fewer will be better once 2.0 comes out. How many phones come with a scientific calculator built it? I've never seen one.

      Would you like another example? I've stopped using my fully-functional and feature-rich PDA simply because the iPhone is so much easier to use. I occasionally miss Flash but, then again, most websites with Flash wouldn't work anyways.

  4. Finally, I want one by Illbay · · Score: 1

    Didn't even blink at the first entry, because of lack of 3G. Now, color my ears "perked."

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Finally, I want one by peragrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i never buy revision A apple hardware. let the fanatics bug test the hardware.

      damn glad I did too. with built in GPS, better battery life, real apps.

      I just feel sorry for the 6 million original iPhones that are about to hit ebay. Then again if Apple sold 6 million regular iPhones with version 2 coming out in a month in 70 countries just how many more will they sell? the 10 million iphones sold is going to be a drop in the bucket. i would almost expect 12 million units shipped by the end of the year.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Finally, I want one by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      As an original iPhone buyer, I'm not particularly sad, as:

      • The MobileMe service they're rolling out will give me everything I'd get with Exchange, like push email, OTA syncing, a great www interface to my calendars, but without having to have an Exchange server. Finally .mac is really a great proposition.
      • Every iPhone that sells makes the platform I've invested in a little more valuable. I develop for it too.

      All in all, there's a ton of win in today's announcements for the early adopters. I paid more money, but then again, I've had an iPhone for a year.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    3. Re:Finally, I want one by lelitsch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you really should wait. There will be a better iPhone coming out it 2009--unless you want to wait for the really great 2010 model with 50 hours of talk time and 3.5G. Technology moves on.

      Seriously, I bought an iPhone last September for 299 and it is my favorite tech purchase in the last 5 years or so. So ~$2 (one for the hardware, one for the $20 my contract is over my old one) a day for something I use and enjoy every day is fine with me. Actually, it paid for itself the first day I didn't feel the mobile phone interface rage my previous LG, Motorolas and Blackberries gave me.

    4. Re:Finally, I want one by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      Why do you think 6 million iPhones are about to hit eBay?

      The iPhone 2.0 OS will be available to us iPhone 1.x owners too. There isn't any 3G coverage where I live so all that I'm going to be missing out on is GPS.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    5. Re:Finally, I want one by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Only the cheapest/most desperate folks out there will pawn their current iPhone on eBay for a new one. The rest of us will just go buy a new iPhone and add it to the collection. Apple, Inc. wins.

    6. Re:Finally, I want one by nicktripp · · Score: 1

      Don't feel sorry for me and my "regular" iPhone. There's no 3G coverage in my area, I don't use GPS and the location data in the current iPhone is good enough for most apps. The battery life is nice, but battery life isn't an issue for me currently so meh.

      As for the real apps, I'm getting those too, in case you didn't hear. That little software upgrade at the beginning of next month will leave me plenty happy with my regular iPhone.

      The only thing that has me a little bit jealous is the price point, but I'll gladly eat the $100 difference for the bliss I've experience over the last few months from having not used Windows Mobile.

    7. Re:Finally, I want one by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      "i never buy revision A apple hardware. let the fanatics bug test the hardware."

      This looks like a brand new phone and not just a new revision. 3G, GPS, new firmware, and a thinner design. Good luck with the bug testing.

    8. Re:Finally, I want one by mblase · · Score: 1

      There will be a better iPhone coming out it 2009--unless you want to wait for the really great 2010 model with 50 hours of talk time and 3.5G. Technology moves on. The better incentive is that possibly, by that time, Apple's exclusive contract with AT&T will be up (didn't they give AT&T two years?) and you'll be able to get an iPhone with another provider.
    9. Re:Finally, I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen

    10. Re:Finally, I want one by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      You never buy revision A products, but what about revision B? After all, you might as well hold out for the much-improved revision C. But if you're going to wait all that time for revision C, you might as well hold out a little longer for the totally-awesome revision D. But if you're going to hold out for that...

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    11. Re:Finally, I want one by Maserati · · Score: 1

      > i never buy revision A apple hardware. let the fanatics bug test the hardware.

      That's really good advice for any tech company, and especially Apple. They have letdowns from their component manufacturers, odd little design quirks, glaringly missing features (copy & paste on the iPhone, I'm looking in your direction) and other annoyances or errors that mar the design and utility of the product. Even with the copy & paste thing, my time with the iPhone has still been vastly superior to my Razr experience. The 2.0 upgrade and 3rd party apps will be like a whole new phone... experience. yeah, I said it. C'mon, drink the fucking kool aide already.

      RIM is in serious trouble. Palm is putting out a major new OS release this year, and it had better be Really Good. A $199 iPhone is going to sell like absolute fucking hotcakes. Six million of the 1.0s, double or triple that in the 2.0s this year. The white 16GB model alone will outsell the hottest Blackberry. AT&T or not, everyone with an expiring contract is going to seriously think about it.

      Corporate use will skyrocket. The Exchange integration gives you a good handheld email device that doesn't send your data through someone else's infrastructure. This is the sort of thing that makes security or regulatory compliance officers in large corporations all warm and fuzzy inside. Apple is a big SAP customer and SAP is jumping into iPhone development with both feet. That will make a lot of people in the executive suite a lot more comfortable with Apple all of a sudden. Even if their use isn't officially sanctioned, a lot of people will just open Outlook and copy the settings to their phone.

      The first year was just the warm up. I'm absolutely terrified because I'm looking in the store at a 16G and at my dwindling free space on my current phone and seriously considering a new one. 3G would make it a business expense though.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    12. Re:Finally, I want one by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I've got a "4th generation" Aluminum PowerBook G4. It's excellent. Without a doubt, the best and most finely-honed of the Al PBG4 series - and 2 months after I bought, the MacBook Pro was introduced. The thinner, many-times-as-fast, future-proofed Intel model came out almost as soon as the PPC was perfected. The presence of the MacBook Pro doesn't make my computer any less powerful or capable. Welcome to the world of technology.

      Buy what you need when you need it. Any other advice is bad advice.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  5. Buttons? by CastrTroy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Metal Buttons? I thought the iPhone didn't have any buttons.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Buttons? by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Metal Buttons? I thought the iPhone didn't have any buttons. There are several, actually: Power, Home, Volume up and down, and a slider for silent mode.
    2. Re:Buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you were wrong!

  6. Price... by msauve · · Score: 3, Informative

    $199/8GB, $299/16GB. Available 7/11 in 22 countries.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Price... by ttul · · Score: 1

      From the engadget coverage:

      Showing all the countries, playing Small World -- most of South America... Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Czech, Switzerland, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Malta, Croatia, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Greece, Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, Niger, Mali, Senegal, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Kenya, Botswana, South Africa... man, way too many countries!

    2. Re:Price... by BenphemeR · · Score: 1

      does that mean 7/11 for USA?

    3. Re:Price... by ttul · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, it will be released 7/11 in the USA.

    4. Re:Price... by Plug · · Score: 5, Funny

      Available at the 7/11? They're really breaking new ground with distribution of this one!

    5. Re:Price... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Bummer, I was hoping the Kwik-E-Mart would get the exclusive on this one.

    6. Re:Price... by fux · · Score: 1

      Not for this price on all countries...

    7. Re:Price... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Available in 22 countries, none of which is Rural America.

    8. Re:Price... by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Funny

      does that mean 7/11 for USA? 7/11 sells telephones now? I'm confused..
      --
      You just got troll'd!
    9. Re:Price... by johnw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Available 7/11 in 22 countries. So the USA gets it in July and the rest of the world has to wait until November?
    10. Re:Price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Available 7/11 in 22 countries. So the USA gets it in July and the rest of the world has to wait until November? 90% of Slashdot readers don't get this Euro-USA-joke (November 7, not July 11). It is a joke, right?
    11. Re:Price... by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually they do :P AT&T, Virgin, T-Mobile, amongst others, sell pre-paid phones in convenience stores, including 7/11 :P

    12. Re:Price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 7th of November ?? That's a long wait.

    13. Re:Price... by chrnb · · Score: 1

      In South Korea only old people buy phones at 7/11...

      Joking aside, in Japan you can actually buy phones at convinience stores.

      --
      MikMik Baby Organics Mikkaworks
    14. Re:Price... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Well, I did buy a phone card there once when I locked my cel phone (and housekeys) in my house. I guess it's the next logical step... (Thank goodness they also had one of the last remaining pay phones outside.)

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    15. Re:Price... by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

      So the USA gets it in July and the rest of the world has to wait until November?

      Yeah, when the EU found out that Apple had posted both metric and non-metric specs online, they confiscated the first shipment. Also, I hear that a small town in France has changed its name to something vaguely sounding like "iPhone" and got declared a Protected Designation of Origin, which will delay things even longer...

    16. Re:Price... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Available 7/11

      That thar sounds lahk tourist talk. Wah du yoo hate Ahmerika?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    17. Re:Price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha i get it. If you're from a different country you'd think 7/11 is November 7th. Apple is a US company so they meant July 11th. In the US the month comes first

  7. Re:EBay is happy! by jmauro · · Score: 4, Informative

    All of the featrure you mentioned will be available in "early July" to the original iPhone users when the 2.0 version of the firmware is released. Only hardware upgrades like GPS and 3G won't be.

  8. What is the data rate $20 /m $40 /m also 3g cap? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    What is the data rate $20 /m $40 /m also 3g cap? 5gb may be too small for this phone.

  9. First post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beat my expected $250 price. Nice going Apple.

  10. Quick! by joshlewis · · Score: 1

    Quick, somebody find a reason why it's not good enough yet, or I might have to absolutely freaking love it! This looks like a smash hit to me.

    --
    If senility was a race, I would win.
    1. Re:Quick! by jbeaupre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The bitter aftertaste of the Kool-Aid.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    2. Re:Quick! by lordholm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, there is no front facing video-camera. One of the key points of 3G is that there is native video conferencing support in the networks.

      Further, can you ge an unlocked version (even if subsidised with a contract would be great), I refuse to pay anything for a phone if I cannot switch SIM card in it. I live in the UK, have my parents in Sweden and my girlfriends family is in Belgium and I am going to the Netherlands a lot for work.

      So, tell me, even though the EU have done a lot of work in capping the roaming fees, they are still way to high, and especially for data transfers, why would I get an iPhone. I would really want one, but without front facing camera and reasonable options to ge an unlocked phone (I dont mind signing a contract in my country of residence), why the heck would I get one.

      Frankly, I will not get the iPhone until those items are fixed on the todo list.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    3. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) likely locked to a network, without some hacking
      2) limited developers: SDK is definitely limited (even the promised SDK's) will likely slow development community on non-hacked phones.
      3) expensive apps when apple gets 1/3 of the money from all applications, as well as a good chunk of your monthly phone bill, it will remain the most expensive choice for anything it doesn't do out of the box. limited to one network, will mean it will be unlikely to get significant market share anytime soon, to make up for the additional development cost.
      4) development for a non-competitive device: You got a killer app, good luck, monopoly company (doesn't matter if ms, apple, or other) will make sure they pull the strings, you bend over, or they just take it from you.

    4. Re:Quick! by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      The bitter aftertaste of the Kool-Aid.

      While you are experiencing the aftertaste of sour grapes.
    5. Re:Quick! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Most likely torpedo: AT&T 3G data plan price point rape. Or ridiculous download limits (how long does it take you to download 500mB at 3G speeds?)

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:Quick! by jandrese · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Video teleconferencing is your stumbling block? I can agree with not being able to swap SIM cards, but Video Teleconferencing is one of those features that people talk about a lot but almost never use in my experience.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:Quick! by DittoBox · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the Apple iPhone 3G Tech Specs Page, the box includes a "SIM Ejector Tool" and the diagram at the top of the page shows a SIM Card Tray at the top of the unit.

      There is hope yet.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    8. Re:Quick! by lordholm · · Score: 1

      It also does not support ODF files as far as I can see. That is also a major problem, especially on slashdot.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    9. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: SIM changing... it now comes with a 'SIM changing tool'... ie, a paperclip most likely. BUT... make of it what you will.

    10. Re:Quick! by g0at · · Score: 1

      I refuse to pay anything for a phone if I cannot switch SIM card in it. I thought there was easy access to the SIM in the iPhone; am I mistaken?

      -b

    11. Re:Quick! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      It is a stumbling block when other phones have that feature as standard - why bother waiting and paying more for it? Because it has 3G? Well no - 3G was old news years ago.

      I may only use it rarely, but when I do decide to use it, I don't want to have to go "Oh, I can't do that because I bought an Apple phone". I expect a phone to just work.

      Moreover, if I didn't need all these new features, then I wouldn't bother looking for a new phone in the first place.

    12. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out the tech specs
      http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html

      the picture on upper right points to a sim card slot. So you can make off your list.

      It is interesting, that the tech specs is the only place that has mentioned the sim card. That seems like a pretty big deal.

    13. Re:Quick! by lordholm · · Score: 1

      Technically you are right, but when inserting a SIM from an other operator in another state/country, I include that switching SIM is not just about the physical act of switching SIM but also includes the fact that the other SIM will work in the phone, i.e. unlocked. Now, I know that you can unlock it through hacks, and also get an unlocked one in France or Belgium, but looking on the hacks, they seem to have been unreliable and updating the phone software with patches from Apple is really out of the question in that case.

      At the moment, getting an unlocked phone in France is possible, but it is quite a lot more expensive.

      What they should do is to introduce a subsidised telephone, where you get a contract (with premature termination penalties), and that is unlocked. I would be happy to add maybe a EUR 100 extra for that phone compared to the network locked versions.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    14. Re:Quick! by Kostya · · Score: 1

      No you're not wrong. The easy access is called a "paper clip".

      That said, I don't think you can just carry SIMs and jack them in and out of the iPhone. I believe you have to take the newly SIMed iPhone and sync it with iTunes to get it working again.

      In that regard, it has easy access, but not to the feature the parent wants.

      --
      "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
    15. Re:Quick! by Builder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The first gen iPhone has that same SIM tray and you can swap SIMs in it. That doesn't mean they'll work though - you have to jailbreak and unlock the network lock to make another SIM work.

    16. Re:Quick! by olafva · · Score: 1

      Had my iPhone in Europe for 2 months - worked great.
      Unlock at ziphone.com with one click, then insert whatever SIM for whatever country you want. And I thought you Europeans knew something about phones. BTW fring allows you to make calls via Skype WITH NO CONTRACT or W/O a SIM card from any WIFI hot spot.

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    17. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Denmark the provider has to unlock the phone upon request, after the contract has ended (Contracts cannot be longer than 6 months here), for free.

      Normally they will do it for a fee, if you want to unlock it midcontract too. You still have to honour the contract naturally.

      ie, the phones can be unlocked, and the tools are allready made for it, by Apple = Unlocked iPhones sooner than August.

    18. Re:Quick! by delvsional · · Score: 1

      can it receive or send pictures to other phones and back like other phones could 4 years ago? does it have ssh? if so then i might buy one.

      --
      Oh Crap, I'm an optimist.....
    19. Re:Quick! by magnamous · · Score: 1

      Is the network lock a software/firmware lock, or is it a hardware lock (or both)? In other words, if later down the road, the exclusivity contract with AT&T wasn't renewed, could Apple upgrade all existing iPhones to unlocked status with a software update, or would it require a new piece of hardware?

      I guess another way of asking this is: if I want an unlocked iPhone, do I have to buy it from a country where they're selling it with multiple carriers?
      (Or is there a way to designate multiple locked carriers on one phone?)

    20. Re:Quick! by unfunk · · Score: 1

      Don't forget! Still no MMS or video recording support!

    21. Re:Quick! by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      It doesn't support AutoCAD files, too. Totally useless phone.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    22. Re:Quick! by Builder · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what kind of lock it is, only that it can be defeated with software run against the iPhone. I've had similar things with my Nokia's on UK carriers.

    23. Re:Quick! by 3.14159265 · · Score: 1

      And that's nothing a makeup mirror doesn't solve. Just being MacGyverish.

    24. Re:Quick! by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      You can send pictures via email. If the other phones can't handle pictures via email then I guess the arguement could be made that their feature set is incomplete. And while SSH isn't part of the default OS I don't doubt that someone will create an app for it.

  11. Re:This is also likely to... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or really interest those of us who are already pissed off at Verizon.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  12. 2 hours by antifoidulus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    and almost NOTHING about the mac....despite WWDC being billed as something for both Mac AND iPhone devs....who cares about mobile me? I guess it shows where Apple's priorities are, since given all the shit that has been wrong with Leopard, they certainly aren't on the Mac.

    1. Re:2 hours by RemovableBait · · Score: 4, Informative

      To be fair, he did say right at the beginning that there'd be a presentation offering a glimpse of OS 10.6 'Snow Leopard' after lunch and that this morning's keynote was just about the iPhone.

    2. Re:2 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are devoting the whole afternoon to the mac platform and updates planned for Snow Leopard.

    3. Re:2 hours by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed the announcement of the next keynote, all about SnowLeopard... Starting right now, in fact :)

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    4. Re:2 hours by ptbarnett · · Score: 1

      and almost NOTHING about the mac....despite WWDC being billed as something for both Mac AND iPhone devs....

      Jobs opened the keynote with an announcement they would be talking about Snow Leopard after lunch.

    5. Re:2 hours by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      The rumor is (and we'll know for sure this afternoon) that Snow Leopard will be a bug fix/performance release, targeted for early next year, possibly involving the elimination of support for PowerPC, among other things.

    6. Re:2 hours by xutopia · · Score: 1

      What's so bad about Leopard?

    7. Re:2 hours by norminator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given the fact that this one is called "Snow Leopard" and not Lynx or Meercat or tabby or any other type of cat more distant from Leopard, I would guess that Snow Leopard is not intended to be a major upgrade from Leopard, and I think it's actually somewhat of a confession that they want to make Leopard much better before they move on from it.

      Hopefully they'll have a separate "upgrade from Leopard" SKU that they either won't charge for, or that will be a much smaller price than the usual price.

    8. Re:2 hours by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I certainly hope not. I for one do NOT like being charged for stuff that should have been there from the start. Come on, Apple(i hope) isn't Microsoft, they shouldn't be pulling this bullshit unless they want their base to turn on them. I feel like I'm using a Microsoft product when I use Leopard, I don't do anything special with my SR macbook, but have had plenty of kernel panics and odd crashes, esp. of iTunes. Really does make me feel like I'm using a Microsoft product. I don't even want to see what their server version is like. I was forced into using a Tiger Open Directory server at work, and its a buggy pile, I shudder to think what Leopard must be like.

      Apple support doesn't help any either. At one point they actually told me that a problem I was experiencing was a bug and that I should have to come up with a workaround, and still charged us an incident for such a lovely revelation. I am having issues getting our new Leopard workstations to connect to the Tiger open directory(another Apple product!) and the support guy hasn't done anything in the past 3 weeks to really help, despite the massive amount of money we are paying Apple.

      Leopard wouldn't bother me so much if we weren't FORCED to use it if we want new hardware. We are starting to replace our aging powermac G5s(which still work for the most part, but as the hardware ages we are running out of spares) and settled on the shiniest Mac Pros that came out in January. However, as part of the deal we were forced to use Leopard, you cannot install Tiger on these machines. So instead of focusing on what our customer needs, we have to deal with an endless Apple bug parade or just stick to aging hardware. There is no middle ground. Apple makes fun of Vista customers going back to XP, but at least they have the option! If I could run Tiger on my macbook or the new mac pros at work, I would in a second but Apple is so arrogant that they refuse to let me do so and instead have to put up with their bullshit.

      Furthermore, Apple seems to not realize that the rest of the world doesn't always work like they do. For example, look at Java. Apple was over a year late on getting Java 6 on the mac, and now it only exists for Leopard 64-bit intel users. WTF? It can run on Windows 2k for crying out loud! There are many more examples of Apple's hubris, but that is one of the best imo. It prevents us from going to Java 6 because we haven't replaced everything here with 64 bit intel Leopard machines....

      The situation with Apple of late kind of reminds me of the ending of Animal Farm, when the rest of the animals couldn't tell the difference between pigs and humans. I am starting to not see the difference between Apple and Microsoft....

    9. Re:2 hours by mzs · · Score: 1

      Where can I see a live blog of the OS 10.6 talk?

    10. Re:2 hours by RemovableBait · · Score: 1

      Well, that is a standard WWDC session covered under Apple's Developer NDA, so I guess that means no liveblogging.

      No doubt there'll be leaks from all the usual places.

    11. Re:2 hours by aptenergy · · Score: 1

      It's available in the Canadian press release:

      http://www.apple.com/ca/press/2008_06/snow_leopard.html

    12. Re:2 hours by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      IFor example, look at Java. Apple was over a year late on getting Java 6 on the mac, and now it only exists for Leopard 64-bit intel users. WTF? It can run on Windows 2k for crying out loud! And who supplies that Java 6 for 2k? Is there a website at Microsoft I can get it from? Or does it come from Sun?

      Why is it Apple's fault that Sun hasn't ported Java?
    13. Re:2 hours by jayratch · · Score: 1

      I know this is covered before, but...

      what "fiasco"?

      I haven't met anyone who used Leopard for a while and didn't like it.

      Sure there were some early glitches, but its called software update, and its currently the most stable and powerful OS I've ever used.

    14. Re:2 hours by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Read up on the subject, Apple insisted that they do the port for OS X because they wanted the GUIs to look as native as possible, which is fine as long as you put at least some sort of effort into keeping it current, but recently this doesn't seem to be a concern of Apples. In the 10.2/10.3 days, Apple went crazy creating all sorts of bindings, such as Cocoa and Quicktime. Then they abruptly deprecated the former and haven't come close to keeping the latter up to date, but refuse to deprecate it or give us a replacement(other than going all Cocoa....)

    15. Re:2 hours by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Come on, Apple(i hope) isn't Microsoft, they shouldn't be pulling this bullshit unless they want their base to turn on them.

      That's *hilarious*. Apple have been "pulling this shit" for twenty years. If there's one thing they've figured out, it's that their user base is _never_ going to "turn on them".

      I am starting to not see the difference between Apple and Microsoft....

      You'd need some pretty rose-tinted glasses to have ever detected any difference (and that's being generous to Apple).

    16. Re:2 hours by pohl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, it must be all about shame. It couldn't possibly be the case that after several long cycles of innovation it might be a good idea to hold the APIs constant and merely refactor, fix, & profile. Me fail software engineering? That's unpossible,

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    17. Re:2 hours by pohl · · Score: 1

      Now

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    18. Re:2 hours by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      I don't see any coverage of NDA sessions there.

    19. Re:2 hours by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      If there's one thing they've figured out, it's that their user base is _never_ going to "turn on them".

      That's not entirely true - I consider myself something of a former Apple fanboy, but after the streak of hardware problems I've had over the past few years, the Apple systems I have are being replaced by commodity PC hardware as they die. The only Apple machine I regularly use now is my iPod, and when the wife's MacBook dies, it's almost certainly going to be replaced with non-Apple hardware as well.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    20. Re:2 hours by daBass · · Score: 1

      So if you are still running Tiger on what sounds like all your computers, how do you know that Leopard is so bad? Did you upgrade to it, did not like it and then downgrade again?

      Leopard has been rock solid for me. There were a few initial crashes that annoyed me but low and behold: it didn't take a Leopard update, but rather a Parallels update to make those go away. Leopard was fine all along.

      That said: Snow Leopard sounds like a good plan. While performance of Leopard is better that 10.4 already, I don't get the feeling it is making the most of any of my Macs.

    21. Re:2 hours by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      How do you know the Parallels update wasn't a workaround for a bug in Leopard?

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    22. Re:2 hours by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      I don't do anything special with my SR macbook, but have had plenty of kernel panics and odd crashes, esp. of iTunes. There's something wrong with your machine, you should get it looked at. I've been running Leopard with no issues since 10.5.1. No kernel panics.
  13. Pricing by quark1943 · · Score: 0

    While at $199 you get great many features like GPS, 3G, full browsing along with fully functional phone, its the darn at&t lock-in for 2 years with $20 premium every month (on top of a typical smart-phone tariff) that I need to shell-out gets me thinking. Still a great bargain compared to my windows mobile phone with blue-tooth GPS dongle and third-party crappy applications.

  14. Can hardly beat the prices by AchiIIe · · Score: 2, Informative

    The rock bottom price for a GPS device nowadays is $150. You can switch to the iPhone for merely $199. Can't beat it. Oh and for our european friends: It's merely â126, Four our british friends: it's merely £100

    --
    Nature journal lied in Britannica vs Wikipedia Ask to retrac
    1. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by mustardayonnaise · · Score: 1

      yes, but you're not going to spend an additional $100/month to use your GPS device.

    2. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Four our british friends

      Our British friends still spell "for" the same.
    3. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tack on the huge monthly data plan, and your $199 iPhone comparison begins to sink real fast.

      I'll stick with my SERO plan, including unlimited data, Opera mobile browser, and $60 GPS add-on from eBay, thanks.

    4. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that it won't be £100. Technology prices never obey exchange rates. I would expect the $199 device to cost at least £169. If it were £100 even I might be tempted to buy one!

    5. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      It all depends on the software. Also the antenna. I have the GPS in my AT&T Tilt (also known as "Kaiser/TyTNII/HTC 8925) and I'd qualify it as "alright". The main difference I see is how long it takes to lock into a signal, and the trouble you get sometimes going around a city or heavily wooded area. There is the option of an external antenna, but that costs $ and "real" GPS devices seem to have beefier antennas built in. You also need to drop $150-$200 on GPS software (or ...ahem... find it elsewhere for cheaper). Google maps is NOT GPS navigational software - it just doesn't compare with TomTom because it doesn't have stuff like voice updates, time to destiantion, rerouting, etc. And there's the fact that you're out of 3G zone a lot of time. So if you do that, you've dropped extra bucks on software, and 25% of that 8GB flash is now map data.

      Don't get me wrong - having GPS built in is a great thing, and I use it almost every day w/ google maps, but its not a stand in for a dedicated GPS device unless you a) buy the extra software, b) get an external GPS antenna.

    6. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Is GPS function disabled if you don't nave service?

    7. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by aeskdar · · Score: 0, Interesting

      yes, but you're not going to spend an additional $100/month to use your GPS device.
      I plan on unlocking mine...
    8. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, dollar-euro conversions don't work that way when multinational corporations are involved.

      May be 199 euro will be more accurate, in countries where phones cannot be locked to just one carrier, as in France.
      In other coutries, hopefully a 18 contract with some European carrier will make them available for 100 euros or less.

      By the way, did they forget bluetooth again?

    9. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      If Apple has a buffer flow exploit in this new firmware. If not, you're not unlocking it (and neither am I, to my dismay =( ).

    10. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Insightful

      an additional $100/month to use your GPS device I was going to post the exact same thing.

      Then I remembered my trusty Garmin:

      $5/month for the painfully inaccurate ClearChannel traffic info.

      $215 for the traffic receiver (granted, you can find a C550 with it included for less if you shop around).

      $160 for the travel guides.

      $100-$150 every time you want to go to a new country.

      $70/year for the map updates.

      Granted, you don't need to buy all of those. But every one of them involves Garmin prying your wallet open for something that's free on the net/Google Maps and thus free once you have paid your $70 monthly net access on your iPhone.
    11. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by mustardayonnaise · · Score: 1

      yikes. i paid $200 for a mio c3 digiwalker 2 years ago. still works fine for my purposes, and i haven't had to lay out any additional dough. i would guess, to be quite frank, that my usage patters are probably more in-line with a 'traditional' gps user than yours, looking at all the additional stuff you've added on, so i suppose an iphone 3g would make more sense for you...

    12. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was funny. I didn't even catch it until you pointed it out.

    13. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      For our british friends: it's merely £100

      Hahahahahaha like that will ever be the conversion rate a US company would use.

    14. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I picked up a bluetooth gps adapter for $40. Works perfectly with my phone (HTC Apache running google maps natively)

    15. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by SubComdTaco · · Score: 1

      Except, Apple is using A-GPS, which supplements regular satellite GPS data with info from cellular towers, so Apple could restrict GPS to only those with current cellular activation. Tis will make the GPS makers happy :)

    16. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by De+Lemming · · Score: 1

      From this article about leaked firmware and the announcement the iPhone will combine GPS, Wi-Fi, and cell tower location technology, I conclude the new iPhone will use Assisted GPS, explained here.

      This should improve the speed and ability to lock to satellites. It can even provide (less accurate) location data without a GPS signal, using WiFi and cell tower info (the iPhone 1.0 and iPod Touch already use this).

    17. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      I don't think it has voice directions, which would make it fairly useless as a car GPS. Google maps has never offered voice directions before, voice directions weren't mentioned in the keynote, and they're not mentioned on apple.com's new 3G iPhone info pages either.

      The 2.5G iPhone wasn't loud enough to make voice directions useful anyway, but Steve did say this version has "improved audio", so maybe it's louder?

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    18. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by byornski · · Score: 1

      And with the markup that devices in the UK get, I bet it will be a lot more than £100...

    19. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by mblase · · Score: 1

      The rock bottom price for a GPS device nowadays is $150. You can switch to the iPhone for merely $199. Can't beat it. Yes you can, because you're forgetting to factor in the monthly subscription fee for the iPhone. If you only want a GPS, the annual (optional?) map upgrades are a whole lot less.
    20. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's built into the Tilt as well. (Though its not quite as advanced - there's an installed program called "QuickGPS" that periodiclaly runs - I've heard it refered to on GPS forums as "offline GPS".) True AGPS sounds intersting and I'll definately be keeping track of reviews on the iPhone for this. Of course, until I can use my stereo bluetooth set with it I'm staying put - it boggles the mind they still don't have this!

    21. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by vallette · · Score: 1

      In the presentation he said it would sell for a maximum of 199 USD so I think it's safe to assume it'll be in the 100 GBP range.

    22. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the iPhone is not likely to be a "proper" GPS. It's probably just a cheap GPS receiver, which you can use for certain things like Google Maps. While that dedicated GPS features things like a better quality receiver, electronic compass, and mapping tools.

      I reckon that you probably won't even be able to save GPS tracklogs on the iPhone, and you won't be able to load your own maps, etc.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    23. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rock bottom price for a GPS device nowadays is $150.


      Dude! Rock bottom prices are $79.99-$99.99 right now on GPS devices. How the frack did you get the $150 figure?
    24. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by L7_ · · Score: 1

      Two words, five syllables: iPhone SDK.

      If there is a market for voiceovers of the already present textual google directions, then it will be made.

    25. Re:Can hardly beat the prices by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      You can't modify the existing apps; there's no way to simply add voice to the Maps application (plus this would probably violate NAVTEQ/TeleAtlas's license to Google for the map data; dollars to doughnuts their contract has explicit language about a voice directions feature).

      So if third parties want to make a voice navigator app, they will have to implement an entire navigation software suite themselves. The only people with licenses to the necessary data are existing GPS manufacturers. A port of the existing Garmin or TomTom software to the iPhone is not at all interesting to me. If Apple/Google did it, it would be free, totally integrated, have a great UI, and most of the processing and data storage would be done in the cloud. If Garmin or TomTom does it, it will be an expensive, separate, non-integrated application, with glacially slow ported UI, and all data stored on the device (in the style of their other products), which means crappy search, outdated and incomplete data, and upgrade fees.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  15. Re:Verizon by oahazmatt · · Score: 4, Informative

    But can I get it on the Verizon network? Where I live, Verizon is the best provider so I'm unwilling to switch to ATT just for the iPhone. No. It's GSM. You'd have to use CDMA on Verizon.

    Oddly enough, one program, "Loopt" is available on both providers, but I cannot find it in any of the App listings on Vz's website.
    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
  16. "Thank you Steve, may I have another?" by LibertineR · · Score: 0, Troll

    True, but Apple customers are quite used to taking their yearly beating, and begging for more. No 3G kept me from the first iPhone, but I'll get one now, just so I can laugh at those who blew $500 on the first version, WITHOUT 3G. I intend much abuse.

    1. Re:"Thank you Steve, may I have another?" by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I blew $600, thank you very much. And I don't get 3g signal within fifty miles so big deal.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:"Thank you Steve, may I have another?" by beef+curtains · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In that case, prepare for "much abuse" to be aimed in your direction when a newer, snazzier iPhone is released in 2009.

      I think you should hold off on your purchase in anticipation of the next model. In the meantime, maybe you can fashion your own smartphone by duct-taping a Palm V, a Creative Zen and an old Nokia together. Think of what a rebel you'd be then!

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
  17. But can I use my Mac as an interface? by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

    Like with using Bluephone Elite to quickly type up a text message using a real keyboard and leaving my phone in my pocket...

    Seriously, this is the only technological hinderance keeping me from getting an iPhone now that it covers everything that Sony Ericsson has to offer -_-'
    Either way, it's damn tempting to get one now...

    1. Re:But can I use my Mac as an interface? by teknopurge · · Score: 1

      Why would you need to do that when you can use a widget to send SMS from the desktop?

      Dog first, then tail...

    2. Re:But can I use my Mac as an interface? by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

      Because the SMS widget needs an internet connection (it's essentially sending an email to the phone, but it gets received as an sms), and Bluephone Elite does it through the phone.

    3. Re:But can I use my Mac as an interface? by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. i also really liked bluephone elite's display of incoming text messages... very nice (and the one thing i've missed since moving to the iphone.)

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
  18. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Omitting certain countries is in my opinion not the best way to make your coverage look better:

      http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/06/wwdc-keynote_185.jpg

    Isn't there something missing in the North Atlantic?

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      What has Greenland ever done for you, anyway?

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    2. Re:Anonymous Coward by Nerftoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, Apple could not find a partner to install 3G towers throughout Greenland's 840,000 square miles for a population of just 54,000 people. BTW, Greenland's slogan is "Move to Greenland, we'll give you 1,000 square miles of land".

    3. Re:Anonymous Coward by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Hey, just be glad Wales is still there. Otherwise there'd be hell to pay!

    4. Re:Anonymous Coward by xaxa · · Score: 1

      He might mean Iceland.

    5. Re:Anonymous Coward by loraksus · · Score: 1

      With the global warming, that probably won't be a bad deal in a few years ;)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  19. Can existing users upgrade? by sacrilicious · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does Apple allow existing users to upgrade, possibly restarting their 2yr contract, or are they forced to hold to the terms of their previous contract with the old hardware?

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You've always been able to do this. You just have to sign up with another 2 year contract.

    2. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by mr_matticus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple doesn't have anything to do with that. AT&T has always allowed customers to upgrade their phones at any time, usually restarting the 2-year contract. However, if you are buying or bringing in unsubsidized hardware, it has been my experience that the contract does not get restarted (and obviously, if you just move your SIM card into a different handset that you've acquired through a third party, there's no change in your contract).

      The only way Apple might be involved is in verifying your existing iPhone account at purchase before handing you the box. This seems likely, given the price and the fact that they're obligated to honor their exclusivity agreement (and AT&T, for all its other missteps and poor decisions, has been doing a decent job with providing iPhone customers with service and value-added perks [including rapid expansion of their previously pathetic 3G network]).

    3. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by daveywest · · Score: 1
      I'm more worried about what At&t is going to do. I specifically changed carriers when my last contract was up to make migration to the iPhone easy.

      I'm worried now that I'll still need to pay full price because At&t won't subsidize someone in their existing contract.

    4. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by StarWreck · · Score: 1, Informative

      You didn't have to get a 2 year contract with your first iPhone. You only have to get a 2 year contract when they give you a discount in exchange for signing up for a 2 year contract. They don't do that with the iPhone.

      So all you have to do is buy the new iPhone and put your old sim card into it!

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    5. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your sim card will work fine with new iPhone so its just like replacing your lost iPhone.

    6. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I do decide to buy a new iPhone next month, when I activate it through iTunes, I will be asked if I want to associate it with an existing phone number or if I want a new phone number. In either case, I would start a new 2-year contract.

      When I put in my current phone number, it will be associated with the SIM in my new iPhone and my old iPhone will become an unactivated iPhone. I'm not sure if the current content will be erased automatically.

      I would then be able to sell or give away my old iPhone to someone else. When he activated it through iTunes, he would also start a new 2-year contract.

      Apple sells another phone, AT&T gets four more customer-years, I get a faster iPhone and someone else gets a cheap or free iPhone.

      OTOH, there's nothing wrong with my current iPhone. I'm rarely in places where there's no WiFi and even 16 gig wouldn't hold all of my content at once.

    7. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that they'll at least allow you to enter a new contract, but it will add on two years above and beyond your existing contract. There's no way they would deny you the opportunity to commit to an even longer time as their customer.

      It should also be noted that the new iPhone unlimited data plan is $30 a month whereas the prior minimum was $20.

    8. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, I was told by ATT the Apple iPhone was the only phone you can keep upgrading w/o getting penalized.

    9. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this up is mistaken.

      You can't "just buy" the new iPhone. You have to upgrade your phone and account, restarting your 2-year commitment on your iPhone 3G purchase date. You cannot buy the iPhone 3G without proof of AT&T service.

    10. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by GarfBond · · Score: 1

      Uh, totally not true. The iPhone has required a 2-year contract from day one with AT&T.

      It just so happens that AT&T hasn't been quite as anal with first generation iPhone upgrades, probably due to the lack of subsidization. We'll see how that works going forward.

    11. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, the current hardware can be upgraded to the new software.

      Secondly, the phone isn't subsidized so you can buy an new 3G phone and replace the old one without any change to your contract.

    12. Re:Can existing users upgrade? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, a new iPhone purchase will restart a 2 year contract, rather than extend it. If you purchased an iphone in the past month, they'll give you an updated version for free.

  20. Camera upgrade?????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depressing, still no video and no camera upgrade. Half what I was hoping for but the other half was a disappointment. How about charge another $100 and give me a better camera model and what's with the no video support???? Kind of a let down after waiting a year.

    1. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by mustardayonnaise · · Score: 1

      why is a good camera so important on this? if you're gonna play ansel adams it seems like you'd probably get a REAL camera instead of using the iphone cam... for what it does, the builtin cam is quite fine IMHO

    2. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this. Maybe it's just because the camera on my current phone is appalling, but every time I went into an Apple Store and tried out the iPhone camera, I was astounded by how clear the picture was. No doubt the difference is less noticeable once it's on a computer screen...

      No mention of geotagging though, as far as I'm aware, which is a bit of a disappointment.

    3. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      why is a good camera so important on this?

      One could say the same thing for many of the other extra features that you find in a phone. Why is GPS so important on this? Why is an accelerometer so important on this? Why is a bash shell so important on this? But Apple didn't skimp on those, just the camera. Which doesn't seem to make sense. Lots of people take pictures and don't feel like carrying two gadgets around. A good camera is now a must on any phone I buy. Oh well.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    4. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I tell a lie, geotagging is in there.

      Take a photo with the camera, for example, and iPhone can geotag it with GPS location information. That way, when you share photos online, friends and family can see where every snapshot was taken.

    5. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Well, they are supporting third party apps, so geotagging might not be impossible, but I doubt it'll be in the built-in software.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by fenderized · · Score: 1

      No mention of geotagging though, as far as I'm aware, which is a bit of a disappointment. It's listed under "Camera" at the "Tech Specs" page http://www.apple.com/uk/iphone/specs.html
    7. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Apple's goal is quite clear here. They want to attach an iPhone to every soul on this planet. Hence the price drop and the old camera to lower costs. Also, 2 people buy more software through the AppStore than 1, specially if that 1 person doesn't care about the Apps cause he's too happy playing with the video camera the whole day.

    8. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by Maserati · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of room for improvement in the iPhone camera. never mind the camera itself. I'd love to be able to control shutter speed and exposure. being able to save presets would be awesome.

      The iPhone's big win is in showing off your pictures. That huge display makes photos look great. Flicking through photos is a great way to browse. it's also a fantastic viewfinder. A better camera only helps when you get the photos off the camera. It'd be nice though, I love always having a decent camera with me. Out of the pocket, unlock, hit Camera and start aiming.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    9. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by ltrm · · Score: 1

      Why do I need a decent camera on a mobile phone? Because I'm hardly going to tote a D3 down the pub on the off chance I catch one of my friends getting off with a fat bird. That's what cameras phone are for.

    10. Re:Camera upgrade?????? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I think you will find that many people would prefer to save $200 and stick with the crap camera. Even if they did upgrade it, it would still be crap. Yeah, I guess video would be neat, but I won't really be missing it and neither will many others. You could always jailbreak it if you need it that much. Perhaps battery life was an issue.

  21. No 32GB = Still Waiting by Andrew+Nagy · · Score: 1

    The main reason I would want an iPhone is to eliminate the need to carry around my phone and my iPod. Since I have just over 25GB of music on it at the moment, it looks like I'll have to wait a little longer. I'm not sure why they came out with a 32GB iPod touch and not a 32GB iPhone, but it's pretty disappointing to me.

    --
    Yes, you can dance to Radiohead.
    1. Re:No 32GB = Still Waiting by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      imagine someone with 160GB of content (video + music) in iTunes. It doesn't work for me if i want to carry everything either. You can't pick your top 8GB of favorites? Seriously. That's the price of combo devices. For me, the lack of choice with mobile carriers is still a problem. I may have to go with palm or windows based devices on my next phone upgrade.

    2. Re:No 32GB = Still Waiting by rwrife · · Score: 1

      Stream it over the internet.

    3. Re:No 32GB = Still Waiting by Basilius · · Score: 1

      I believe Apple has said there will _always_ be a capacity gap between the Touch and the iPhone.

      So, either decide what 9GB of stuff you're not going to carry around, or carry two devices.

      At least for another year. I expect capacity will go up next year again.

    4. Re:No 32GB = Still Waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfftt... you say 25gb as though it's a lot

  22. gPhone Android by JavamanPDX · · Score: 1

    I want to wait for android to be released, but with nothing on the horizon I'm willing to shell out a modest $200 for an improved iPhone. I've heard rumors that Google may make an announcement shortly after this one, maybe within a week or so? (I hope) Anyone know?

    1. Re:gPhone Android by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      One of my contacts at google is running android on a jail-broken iPhone. I hope they include iPhone support -- I know there will be a lot of pissed off iPhone users who want to install a better OS now that St. Steve threw them under a bus! They still don't support ogg vorbis. WTF?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:gPhone Android by dn15 · · Score: 1

      I know there will be a lot of pissed off iPhone users who want to install a better OS now that St. Steve threw them under a bus! 1. Buy iPhone and pretend it's the only version Apple will ever make.
      2. Freak out and install Android following announcement of iPhone 2.0, ignoring the software update that will give you most of the new features for free on existing hardware.
      3. ???
    3. Re:gPhone Android by Onan · · Score: 1

      Waitaminutewaitaminute.

      The fact that the phone continues to not play some obscure little sound format, which it never has, and has never implied that it at some point in the future will, now constitutes being "thrown under the bus"? Do you even know what that phrase means?

  23. Not upset about iPhone 1.0 by TibbonZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am not upset about purchasing/owning the iPhone 1.0. It's been leaps and bounds above my Treo 650 and I needed a new iPod anyway.

    I knew from day 1 that that price would come down on future versions. The Apple Lisa was $9,995 in 1983 which is around $21,000 today in 2008. That was the baseline model. As technology grows, things get cheaper. If you haven't picked up this, then perhaps you shouldn't buy technology products. You didn't "have" to buy an iPhone, and you should have seen this coming. You shouldn't also buy such a phone if you can't afford it.

    At the same time, they are upgrading the firmware on the older phones still. My current one still gives me all the battery life I need for reasonable use. I am in a major city (Boston) with wifi almost everywhere. I don't drive, and thus the GPS is a non-feature.

    Anyone that acts "upset" over the new features, and price drop, needs to grow up.

    They didn't add any killer features for me. If they had added even something like the (much rumored, but obviously a lie) video chat functionality or something insane then maybe I'd have thought otherwise. Funny how those rumors/lies got around.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Not upset about iPhone 1.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understandble that one can not be extremely upset but I think that your prespective is not well represented by the rest of iPhone 1.0 owners. A large amount of us actually drive, yes it's true, and so the GPS does intrest me. My point was simply that people of different areas might see this a bit differently. Although I do agree that 1.0 buyers should have saw this coming;)

    2. Re:Not upset about iPhone 1.0 by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      I agree. Is there really anybody who did not know from the outset that there would be a new model around now, cheaper and almost certainly 3G/GPS? The phone was worth the price to me that I paid when I bought it at launch, and I feel like I've gotten my money's worth. If I was willing to wait a year to get a more powerful phone for less money, I would have done so. As it is, I've been very happy with my iPhone, and I'm looking forward to upgrading.

    3. Re:Not upset about iPhone 1.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, look at the fanboys falling all over each other to immolate themselves in the fires of their Apple god. I bought the phone....and expected that if I was locked into the damn thing for two years, the least Apple could do was not make me feel like the ass I apparently am for buying into the bullshit before the two years was up.

      I'm stuck with a slow web phone and the evil ATT-Mart, at half the storage and twice the price, having made the obviously assinine mistake of buying 9 months too early (sarcasm, as now it can be easily determined that those who adopt next month will be half as screwed in the same amount of time, most likely).

      Bottom line...if I had to assume a 2-year contract to purchase their phone, by their rules, then they should make a token effort to not obsolete my phone 9 months in, knowing that I'm stuck with it.

      Fool me once.....

    4. Re:Not upset about iPhone 1.0 by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

      Is the original iPhone obsolete? I really don't think so. The main differences being just that it doesn't have a perfectly accurate GPS (even when I have been in a car/cab the one one was close enough), and it's on EDGE vs 3G which means it's about half as fast when you aren't on wifi. New features alone don't make something older obsolete to me. For example if they come out with a Macbook Pro that is 200mhz faster than my current one, mine is still perfectly functional.

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
  24. Where's the meat? by stokessd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The OS has had a full point release and there doesn't seem to be much for it.

    Where's iChat or am I supposed to keep spending like $0.15 a text for SMS. Speaking of SMS, where's the damn MMS?

    How about spam filtering on the mail client. This is supposed to be "just like the desktop OS X" so how hard can it be to upgrade the mail client to more completely resemble the functionality of mail.app on the desktop?

    No discussion of how the 1st gen phones will handle location.

    Nice one month slip on the OS and app store.

    So as a 1st generation owner, the only major upgrade in my day to day is the ability to get 3rd party apps. Hopefully 3rd party apps will fill in the gaping holes.

    A little adblock would be super helpful too...

    Sheldon

    1. Re:Where's the meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would bet that iChat comes in Sept when their background notification service launches

    2. Re:Where's the meat? by JimNTonik · · Score: 1

      Where's iChat or am I supposed to keep spending like $0.15 a text for SMS. Speaking of SMS, where's the damn MMS? 3rd party apps mean anything? We've seen AIM in the past. I mean, yeah, video chat would be great, but isn't this a step in the right direction?

      How about spam filtering on the mail client. This is supposed to be "just like the desktop OS X" so how hard can it be to upgrade the mail client to more completely resemble the functionality of mail.app on the desktop?

      No discussion of how the 1st gen phones will handle location. CoreLocation (?) seems to handle this using triangulation, as previously announced. Not as accurate as GPS, but it's something.

      Nice one month slip on the OS and app store. Slip? When was it previously announced? The software supporting the store won't be out until then anyway.

      So as a 1st generation owner, the only major upgrade in my day to day is the ability to get 3rd party apps. Hopefully 3rd party apps will fill in the gaping holes. 3rd party apps, apple push application support, exchange support, and a few other features. Were you expecting Apple to unlock hardware features in the phone you bought?
    3. Re:Where's the meat? by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      The iPhone plan comes with something like 200 texts, so I don't know why you're paying $0.15 for each. MMS is still an issue though, but that's what email is for I guess. Regardless, didn't AOL already announce an AIM app? I'm sure there will be plenty of chatting apps available. Spam filtering should be done server side (this is highly debatable, but that's the stance myself and apparently Apple have taken). Although I don't use the mail app, I simply use gmail's iphone interface. And 1st gen phones already handle location through triangulation based on wifi hotspots and cell towers.
      -Steve

    4. Re:Where's the meat? by ccguy · · Score: 1

      Where's iChat
      You must have missed the new push feature. It makes it trivial to implement proper IM.
    5. Re:Where's the meat? by necro81 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Jeeze, which side of the bed did you get up on today?

      The keynote did have a discussion of a standalone IM client, not based on SMS. It won't run as a background process, but rather rely on a new push service that Apple (and carriers I guess) are adding with the 2.0 firmware rollout. The push service is intended to be used for lots of things, not just IM-ing, and will be available through an API to all 3rd-party devs.

      First-gen iPhones can already do some locating-aware stuff off of the location of cell towers. It ain't great - accuracy is to within a hundred feet at best in my experience, but it is good enough for some location-aware applications. It can already be used to tell you the nearest restaurants, etc., just not give you realtime directions, geotagging, etc. Why do you suddenly expect that the rollout of a next-gen iPhone would suddenly mean an upgrade in the hardware of your current iPhone? New hardware with new capabilities is the march of technology.

      Improvements to the software will come out on a continuing basis. In addition to getting 3rd party apps (which as you say can fill in a lot of missing capabilities), firmware 2.0 on first-gen iPhones will give support for a lot of enterprise stuff (I don't know if that applies to you), support for iWork and MS Office file formats, push-everything, and access to MobileMe (all your stuff is in the cloud, and accessible from anywhere, and pushed to all your devices).

    6. Re:Where's the meat? by JayWilmont · · Score: 1

      "No discussion of how the 1st gen phones will handle location." ...the same way it always has? According to the keynote, the original and 3G iPhone both have wifi and cell tower location detection, its just that the 3G iPhone also has GPS.

    7. Re:Where's the meat? by GarfBond · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everything you're asking for was at MacWorld. Official AIM client through app store. Someone somewhere is probably working on an Adium client through the app store.

      No one ever said this was the desktop mail client. That was the MobileMe web app. I'll give you that spam filtering is good to have, but server-side has always been the "better" solution.

      1st gen iphones will handle location just as they always have - a little location button in Maps with cell tower and wifi triangulation. You'll need the latest released iPhone firmware.

    8. Re:Where's the meat? by Moebius+Loop · · Score: 2, Informative

      The OS has had a full point release and there doesn't seem to be much for it.

      Where's iChat or am I supposed to keep spending like $0.15 a text for SMS. Speaking of SMS, where's the damn MMS? Seriously.

      How about spam filtering on the mail client. This is supposed to be "just like the desktop OS X" so how hard can it be to upgrade the mail client to more completely resemble the functionality of mail.app on the desktop? I think it may be related to CPU usage. I'm not sure about the OS X mail filtering, but I know spamassassin uses a huge amount of CPU on even a lightly loaded mail server. I'm guessing some of that's due to more than just the Bayesian filtering Mail.app does, but considering how 'frugal' Apple has been about the iPhone (e.g., officially no background apps), it wouldn't surprise me if there was some correlation.

      No discussion of how the 1st gen phones will handle location. I think this is a non-issue for most location-based apps. Unless they need a high-level of precision, the existing methods of using cell tower triangulation will be enough in most cases, although obviously not as precise as GPS. The key element here is that there's a well-exposed and documented API for this now.

      Of course, GPS Maps will be a no-go.

      Nice one month slip on the OS and app store. Eh, yeah, that's lame, but.... I'm not really losing sleep over this.

      So as a 1st generation owner, the only major upgrade in my day to day is the ability to get 3rd party apps. Hopefully 3rd party apps will fill in the gaping holes. I dunno, me.com is kind of a big deal. I already use .mac to keep my iphone/ipod/machines in sync, so for me, it's a bonus.

      It's hard to tell whether Apple intended iPhone 2.0 to be much more than this before the wailing and gnashing of teeth "forced" them to make a developer API. I get the impression that somehow, some way, they didn't see that coming, and may have had to change plans really fast. Creating an SDK/API for a completely new device is a **huge** undertaking, and it has major implications if they get it wrong.

      Still, I think we're going to see 3rd party apps as a very big deal in the coming months, as long as Apple stays reasonable about access to the developer program. If so, they will have created a pretty huge infrastructure that will allow independent developers to seriously compete with the major software houses.

      There are some things I don't like about the SDK rules, but the fact that free (speech and/or beer) apps will be distributed at no cost could also be a boon for public awareness of free software.
      --
      have you been seen on slash?
    9. Re:Where's the meat? by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      What did you expect from a live presentation? It was boring enough without going into every single detail!

    10. Re:Where's the meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, if I had a penis that couldn't reach my own mouth, I'd whine too.

      And probably leave the house occasionally.

    11. Re:Where's the meat? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The OS has had a full point release and there doesn't seem to be much for it. Where's iChat or am I supposed to keep spending like $0.15 a text for SMS. Push services. They even demonstrated an IM client that backgrounds and will be pushed messages.

      Speaking of SMS, where's the damn MMS? I'd like to know too.

      How about spam filtering on the mail client. This is supposed to be "just like the desktop OS X" so how hard can it be to upgrade the mail client to more completely resemble the functionality of mail.app on the desktop? Welcome to 2008. Anyone with half a hunk of brain is using IMAP with server side rules and filtering.

      No discussion of how the 1st gen phones will handle location. No discussion would seem to indicate they will handle it the exact same way they currently do. What's so hard to understand about that?

      Nice one month slip on the OS and app store. Is this your first time using technology? This is hardly a surprise.

      So as a 1st generation owner, the only major upgrade in my day to day is the ability to get 3rd party apps. Hopefully 3rd party apps will fill in the gaping holes. Ummm....yeah...you seemed to miss the point. The 3rd party apps are supposed to do exactly that.

      A little adblock would be super helpful too... See above.
      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    12. Re:Where's the meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a program for jailbroken phones that blocks ads. This is not a free app however...

      http://cocoamug.com/adblock/

    13. Re:Where's the meat? by xandroid · · Score: 1

      Please God yes, let's have MMS already! The substitute viewmymessage.com service is both a pain in the ass and unreliable. At least implement incoming MMS...

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
    14. Re:Where's the meat? by nathana · · Score: 1

      1st gen phone already handle location...through triangulation, the same way they have since day 1.

      As you say, opening up the iPhone to third-party apps will naturally help fill in some of the holes. There's nothing standing in the way of someone writing a better mail client for the phone than the one that comes with it, and by observing the popularity of such apps, Apple can learn about functionality that people want the iPhone to possibly natively support out-of-the-box, and then improve their own applications. Since it's all just software, there's nothing saying that Apple can't release an update to the system for free with a better e-mail client down the road. Right now, they are concentrating on getting the next-gen hardware platform out the door...once that has been dealt with, the software can be addressed very easily.

      As far as the whole iChat thing goes, I posted the following to a thread on MacRumors.com:

      To those complaining about the lack of a front-facing camera/iChat video feature:

      I was disappointed as well, but then realized that this is probably not something that Apple can provide at the current time anyway. This is because effectively adding iChat capability would be like allowing VoIP calls over the 3G network, except it's even better because you have video AND audio. Since this would be using the data side of the plan, effectively this would be allowing people to get around the voice minutes of their plan, and the cell phone industry probably is not ready to change from their current voice minutes and voice/data split model.

      You might object that Apple could have written the iPhone's iChat client so that it ONLY communicated with other iPhones, and not with MacOS's iChat, effectively making video calls "in-network" calls which are unlimited between AT&T customers as it is, but then people would cry "foul" over that decision as well. Also, even though iPhone is currently only AT&T *in the United States*, there will now be iPhones sold on other networks worldwide, so iChats would be (in theory) free between iPhones on different networks in different countries (!!) unless Apple put an artificial restriction on that ability as well, which would be uber-lame (but the phone companies wouldn't stand for free video/audio "calls" between phones in different companies, cutting into their profit gouging for international calls).

      Unfortunately, that's just the state of things right now. Hopefully, in the (near?) future, the inertia of the way the market is going will force the issue at some point, probably at about the point that cell phone plans become "all-you-can-eat" in much the same way that landline VoIP accounts are, as mobile phone companies begin to leverage the universality of the internet to reduce the cost of national and international voice transport/trunking.

      -- Nathan

  25. Re:EBay is happy! by LibertineR · · Score: 1, Troll

    Somehow, I don't think that will be enough to stem the anger over the new price point. If I own an early iPhone today, I am not a happy camper.

  26. Re:This is also likely to... by Solkar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why? Because a consumer electronics company refreshed a product? Should I be pissed at Sony every few months when they upgrade their camcorders? Should I be mad that the camcorder I bought from them five years ago cost more and is less capable than one I could buy today? Ditto with HP - the LaserJet model I bought in 2001 cost about $900. I can get one today that does the same job (and has more RAM) for $300 (or less). HP owes me $600!

  27. And now the small print... by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the apple site: "# Requires new 2-year AT&T rate plan, sold separately." In other words, there's no such thing as a $199 iPhone. Plans start at $59.99, so you're looking at a minimum outlay of $1638.76 plus tax over two years.

    1. Re:And now the small print... by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oops. I forgot AT&T's $36 new line activation fee and their monthly Regulatory Cost Recovery Charge of up to $1.25. The grand total now stands at $1704.76.

    2. Re:And now the small print... by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      Question for you, what are the "extra" costs.

      Right now I have a high end data phone for Sprint and with the "extra" costs (BS shit like paying for university wireless coverage? WTF?) I am paying 64 bucks a month for a shittier plan than the IPHONE.

      So how much "more" does someone have to pay every single month for the Iphone that is hidden?

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    3. Re:And now the small print... by MistaE · · Score: 1

      This is not new. So please, what's your point? It's a cell phone. You're going to pay close to that for any cellular device. At least they lowered the cost for the device.

      The iPod touch is free with an edu purchase. Go pick up one of those.

    4. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone who points out that you need a phone contract and therefore the real price is "x" need to get over it. You need to pay for phone service even if you get the cheapest virgin mobile phone.

    5. Re:And now the small print... by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So how much "more" does someone have to pay every single month for the Iphone that is hidden? Currently, I'm on a bargain-basement Virgin Mobile prepaid plan because I use my mobile phone almost exclusively to arrange rides. This plan costs $160 for two years. If upgrading from a bargain-basement plan designed for occasional voice to a much more expensive data plan would increase my mobile phone bill by an order of magnitude, I'd need a d*** good reason.
    6. Re:And now the small print... by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

      That is what stops me from getting an iPhone or similar device the service costs too much. I don't mind the two year contract just drop the service price $10 or $15 then I'll go for it.

    7. Re:And now the small print... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      True for every phone. Most smartphones are even more expensive month-to-month. What's your point?

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    8. Re:And now the small print... by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most smartphones are even more expensive month-to-month. What's your point?

      Smartphones are bloody expensive? Most people don't have any reason to care about smartphones? If this was from Nokia or Microsoft the only people who would care would be the yuppies who can actually justify the cost?

    9. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's $200.00 less, than the current 2.5g iphone...

    10. Re:And now the small print... by Dzimas · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      My point is that it's a complete waste of money, especially in a country where 8.8% of homeowners with mortgages are behind on their payments. After realizing that I was using my cell less and less in the past couple of years, I chose not to renew my contract and switched to a prepaid service last year. It saves me a lot of money that was quite literally being wasted.

      In a few hours he web will be flooded with thousands of news articles and blog posts trumpeting Apple's "50% price drop" when it's complete rubbish because people are ignoring the total cost of ownership. In actuality, the decrease is probably in the range of 10%, depending on the plan you take. Not nearly as newsworthy, is it? Have fun in the reality distortion field, but remember that you're still on the hook for that expensive trinket if your job vaporizes 18 months from now. :)

    11. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then you can stick to your old phone and FREE phone plan if you don't want this one. Oh wait...

    12. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on. You're upset that you can't buy an unlocked iPhone for $199 and then, what, opt not to have phone service? Or do you have a secret service that provide 3G mobile phone connectivity for free? What is your point exactly? Boo hoo.

      A year ago it was $599 with a contract. This is a fantastic deal. It's even better for me if that bit about it being "199 USD" everywhere in the world holds up - I'll be buying two in Belgium for 128 euros each. I don't care if the contract is 99 euros a month - it's worth it.

    13. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and because it's tied to AT&T the odds of my buying one are exactly zero.

    14. Re:And now the small print... by sootman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plans start at $59.99, so you're looking at a minimum outlay of $1638.76 plus tax over two years.

      Whenever I see a comment like this, I feel compelled to point out that this is the TOTAL amount. 99% of iPhone purchasers ALREADY have a cell phone with a certain amount of minutes and messages, so the only ADDITIONAL costs are the price of the phone (duh) plus the DIFFERENCE in cost between their current plan and the new one. I had a $39.99 ATT plan so I'm only paying $20/month more for the data (and it's worth every penny, btw) so for me it was $249 (rfb. 4 GB phone right after the first price drop) plus $240/year--that's only $729 over two years. If I would have waited until 7/11/08 to buy, that would be just $679--almost a THOUSAND less than your number.

      Also, if I would have bought a 3G iPhone, I would have not spent $130 on a used GPS a few months ago. And for some people this replaces an iPod as well. Hell, I could literally sell a handful of gadgets that I own and pay for the whole thing.

      PLUS: Figure there's a whole bunch of people who will buy new phones (who cares if it's a new contract, I've been with ATT/Cingular/ATT for over ten years anyway; if I were to replace my iPhone with a new one (probably won't, not sure yet) I wouldn't even blink at the thought of two more years) so there will be a whole bunch of used iPhones all of a sudden, and they'll all be selling for less than $200, maybe as low as $100. I imagine that if you buy and activate a used iPhone, you are not bound to a two year contract. (Anyone know for sure?) You may not even be required to purchase a data plan.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    15. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see, you're bitter and twisted.

      I've just booked a weekend at the ritz-carlton in a 'ritz-carlton' suite ($3500/night) for a getaway. I really don't give a shit about a measly few grand.

      The cost of the mobile service is a constant for most people - I'd far rather give up my home line than my mobile, for example. Given that (majority) perspective, the phone does indeed cost ~$200. Now you're bitter and twisted, so you'll want to whine on about costs and savings, and feel free - just remember that most of us don't give a toss about your personal situation. For those of us who *do* have a bit of disposable income, this is great news. Sucks to be you.

    16. Re:And now the small print... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I think you would find that a 2 year agreement is pretty much the standard these days. There are a few phones that only require 1 year but the norm is 2 year. Plus once you add things like unlimited texting, international calling, etc. the price is about the same.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    17. Re:And now the small print... by RocketScientist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how's the unlimited data service on that prepaid plan?

      I'm not knocking what you're doing, you're buying a product that meets your needs. But you're knocking a product that meets other people's needs. I'm in operations, and the ability to do more things remotely makes my life easier, to the point that I'm willing to pay to get more free time.

      Data services may be a total waste for you. But since they're a total waste for you, you don't seem to want anybody else to have them either. What, everyone should have identical pre-paid cellphones? Why? Maybe other people are *gasp* different? They have different personal and professional interests and needs for communication?

    18. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the apple site: "# Requires new 2-year AT&T rate plan, sold separately." In other words, there's no such thing as a $199 iPhone. Plans start at $59.99, so you're looking at a minimum outlay of $1638.76 plus tax over two years. Right. And the new Ford Focus is $14, 395. What? I have to buy gas for it? Gas is $59.99 every two weeks, so you're looking at a minimum outlay of $3,277.52 over two years. In other words, there's no such thing as a $14,395 Ford Focus. Those car companies are such liars!!!

    19. Re:And now the small print... by randyest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey man, sorry you bit off more mortgage than you can chew and all, but for the 90%+ of us who aren't behind on our mortgage this isn't a waste of money. I reckon you think us responsible ones should pay to bail you irresponsible ones out? No thanks. A new iphone will be more useful and fun to me than paying your mortgage.

      Lighten up, Francis. Some of us want to have fun and aren't dead yet.

      --
      everything in moderation
    20. Re:And now the small print... by STrinity · · Score: 1

      It's not clear. "Requires" could mean that if you want to use it as a phone, you need an AT&T plan like the previous models, or it could mean that if you want to buy the phone you have to get a plan.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    21. Re:And now the small print... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      From the apple site: "# Requires new 2-year AT&T rate plan, sold separately." In other words, there's no such thing as a $199 iPhone. Plans start at $59.99, so you're looking at a minimum outlay of $1638.76 plus tax over two years.

      And this differs from other Smart Phones how?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    22. Re:And now the small print... by jburroug · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the mortgage default rate has to do with iphones but it is OK if I get one? I've saved a lot of money by renting during the silly real estate boom-bust and work for a major oil company so I think I can count on being able to afford the $59/month for service for a couple years. You're point about TCO is valid for someone who doesn't currently have a monthly cell phone bill but I'm already paying about $50/month for a crappy voice plan, with ATT, so the new ATT contract is a non-issue.

      The only reason why I didn't get a first gen iPhone was the upfront cost, $400 on a gadget seemed excessive. The new price and updated features though push it into my "I'd buy that" zone. I imagine it's the same for a lot of other folks out there.

      Cheers,

      Josh

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    23. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your ideas intriguing, and I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      When I left my previous employer that flipped the bill for my mobile phone costs, I could not justify the monthly costs for even the most basic of phone plans. I, too went with a pay as you go plan (10 cents a minute). I don't make a habit of chatting on it for very long - the meat of my conversations can wait until I either arrive home (where I use the $15/month Vonage plan) or go into the office. Until my mortgage, the car, and a good chunk of my kids' college is taken care of, I cannot justify spending the cash for such a luxury.

    24. Re:And now the small print... by anotherone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, it's a cell phone, to be useful cell phones require a cellular provider. If you're going to add service into the price of it, why not also add the price of electricity you use to charge it, the pants you keep it in, and a house since you need a place for all of those pants.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    25. Re:And now the small print... by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      and a house since you need a place for all of those pants.

      The house is optional, but then again so are the pants

    26. Re:And now the small print... by Dzimas · · Score: 1, Troll

      You've got me backwards. I'm mortgage free in my 30s because I *don't* buy a constant stream of expensive electronic toys. My frustration stems from seeing my friends struggle with massive mortgage and consumer debt because they didn't grasp the full meaning of, "buy now, pay later." By all means enjoy your iPhone. You're amortizing Apple's R&D so I can enjoy bargain priced iPods in the future. :)

    27. Re:And now the small print... by tknd · · Score: 1

      It is only standard if you agree to buying a locked phone tied to a cellular service provider. There's nothing stopping you from buying a compatible cell phone and walking into a store to get service for it. The only reason people choose the contract is because they perceive the initial costs as lower when in fact the costs over the lifetime of the quality of service received may be higher.

      My big issue with contracts is that if the service becomes crappy or it is fairly obvious they are screwing me over, I don't have the option of leaving them. The contract locks me to their service and guarantees that I will be paying for the service for the next 1 to 2 years regardless of the quality of service. When you are not on a contract, you have negotiating power on a monthly basis because you can threaten to leave their service if it is not adequate for your needs.

      I believe this is a good reason for why cell phone service and cell phone features have been very poor in the US--because the American consumers will easily sign the dotted line without realizing that they are giving up a huge amount of their negotiation power. That allows the cellular networks to sit on older technology for as long as possible when they are certain they will have a guaranteed revenue stream for the next 1 to 2 years.

    28. Re:And now the small print... by pan0k · · Score: 1

      I wish they are unlock like the rest of the world. Oh well.

    29. Re:And now the small print... by olafva · · Score: 1

      Unless you unlock it with one click "Do it all" on ziphone.com
      and make Skype calls on fring.com (from WIFI hotspots).
      I did it with my iPhone in Europe for 2 months. Just returned.

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    30. Re:And now the small print... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I think you would find that a 2 year agreement is pretty much the standard these days.There are a few phones that only require 1 year but the norm is 2 year.

      Pretty much all the carriers also offer prepaid plans, and depending on use those can be very cheap. I've paid $20/mth for a phone for the last year and a half, so if my understanding is correct and you have to get the $60 plan, that would instantly triple my costs. If I could just pay $200 for the phone and use it with my prepaid account, I would do it an in instant.

    31. Re:And now the small print... by laird · · Score: 1

      "Currently, I'm on a bargain-basement Virgin Mobile prepaid plan because I use my mobile phone almost exclusively to arrange rides. This plan costs $160 for two years. If upgrading from a bargain-basement plan designed for occasional voice to a much more expensive data plan would increase my mobile phone bill by an order of magnitude, I'd need a d*** good reason."

      Would you consider 24/7 unlimited internet access anywhere you go a "d*** good reason" to pay for a real voice/data plan? If not, what are you doing posting on Slashdot? :-)

    32. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Better to be fiscally responsible than a flaming asshole any day.

    33. Re:And now the small print... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      The only reason people choose the contract is because they perceive the initial costs as lower when in fact the costs over the lifetime of the quality of service received may be higher.

      And because of that, we're stuck with this bullshit "standard" two-year contract because the cellular providers know that people will just swallow those costs and other restrictions in the contract and then rave about what a deal they got because of the phone subsidy. It's ludicrous.

      Here's a question - how many of those cellular contracts require you to submit to binding arbitration, even though it's almost *never* in your interest to do so? How many of them offer a pro-rated discount on your monthly rate for the time that the phone is not on the network (phone turned off, bad reception, etc.)? The contracts are so one-sided it's comical.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    34. Re:And now the small print... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Same here. I've been quite happy with my prepaid service (I usually buy 1000 minute blocks at a time, which will last me for 9-10 months on average), but then I have no need for data services, and *very* limited need for SMS. I'm one of the few people that actually use my phone just as a phone, and I see no need to pay a great deal of money for it.

      Of course, your mileage may vary, and everyone's free to buy what they want, but I don't know very many people that truly *need* the "always there" connectivity that most monthly plans offer.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    35. Re:And now the small print... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      If it were from Nokia or Microsoft, it wouldn't have all the features that make people want to own an iPhone. Believe it or not, some people care about more than the shiny logo.

      (Yes, blah blah blah, missing features, no MMS, whine whine whine. I'm not claiming the iPhone has everything, but what it offers it does well; the same can't be said for many other devices)

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    36. Re:And now the small print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're also on the hook for your rent/mortgage. Better not get anywhere to live in case you lose your job. Moron.

    37. Re:And now the small print... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      > How many of them offer a pro-rated discount on
      > your monthly rate for the time that the phone is
      > not on the network (phone turned off, bad
      > reception, etc.)?

      Wait, what ? You want to get money back for turning off your phone ?

      Fuck, I've been trolled. IHL.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    38. Re:And now the small print... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      If you've got the phone turned off, you're not on the network and not using the service, are you?

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    39. Re:And now the small print... by argent · · Score: 1

      If it were from Nokia or Microsoft, it wouldn't have all the features that make people want to own an iPhone.

      The high end Nokias are pretty damn nice phones, and have some pretty damn nice features, and work together pretty damn well. And, well, the lack of a keypad and the clumsy text entry are not "doing things well", they're shiny chrome. I can take notes at a meeting on my Palm, or on a Microsoft mobile phone, I've seen people trying that on the iPhone and it's not pretty.

      And *as a phone* it's just a phone, one that you can't easily use one-handed and that you can't use at all by feel.

      Not everything that Apple does is good just because it's Apple. I wrote off the Mac years ago, and it took me some time to accept OS X as Apple turning around the stuff that had driven me away from them. But there's a core fascination with Apple just because it *is* Apple, and even when I was completely dismissive of them I kept watching to see what the hell crazy stuff they were going to do next.

      THe iPhone is nice, It'd be cool one if someone gave it to me, just like It'd be kind of cool to have Nokia 9000 series phones when they were "everything that was shiny". But except for a month or so after it appeared in that James Bond flick the shininess of the Nokia 9000 series didn't made people who don't care about smartphones (that is, most people) keep paying attention to it.

      The point is that smartphones are bloody expensive, most people don't really need or even strongly want one, and it's only that this one's by Apple is making people forget that like all smartphones it's really a geek toy.

    40. Re:And now the small print... by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      ...which you should note that not only gets you the phone, but also voice and data traffic.

    41. Re:And now the small print... by tkinnun0 · · Score: 1

      Right. And the new Ford Focus is $14, 395. What? I have to buy gas for it? No, you can convert it to use biodiesel and make your own.
    42. Re:And now the small print... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      The point is that smartphones are bloody expensive, most people don't really need or even strongly want one, and it's only that this one's by Apple is making people forget that like all smartphones it's really a geek toy.


      Which just goes to show that they did something right. Everyone will be fascinated by it for different reasons (for me, syncing was the big thing, and mobile email in a distant second, though it's now probably my primary use of the thing), but everyone IS fascinated.

      I know several people here at the office who recently purchased personal blackberries. Probably so they can feel special since the company gives them to our trainers who are going offsite all the time. Half of them have asked me how I'd set up their email on the thing, as if I'm the only geek at a software company (and knowing full well that I'm the iPhone-toting Mac zealot in the MS shop). It's hard to not poke a bit of subtle fun at them for it when I just go to settings->mail->new account and tap the provider to set up my mail account while they have to ask half the company to do the same on the blackberry (I'm not trying to convert them - I'm not one of THOSE Mac guys - but if they ask for my advice...). I understand that it IS a fundamentally better email device thanks to the physical keyboard, but my experience with the interface on those things is always so painful and terrible that I'm willing to make the trade. I'd rather not be swearing at my new device just hours after having bought it.

      Point is that while smartphones may just be expensive geek toys at heart if not being used for business (and what isn't, really?), but they do appeal to more than just the geeks. Why torture yourself to save a few bucks, or have all of the hardware for a great practical application wrapped in a useless interface that hardly allows you to work the thing?

      Put another way, would every other manufacturer be trying to put out an iPhone killer if they didn't see it as a major threat? Even with the relatively low market share as compared to RIM (or perhaps Samsung or Motorola on the more consumer-oriented side of things), you don't hear of manufacturers trying to make a blackberry-killer. Or I don't, anyways. Apple really blurred the line between business and personal devices, and could well erase it entirely when the 2.0 software hits.
      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    43. Re:And now the small print... by argent · · Score: 1

      Why torture yourself to save a few bucks, or have all of the hardware for a great practical application wrapped in a useless interface that hardly allows you to work the thing?

      My phone, after rebates, cost me $50. It's not a smartphone, it doesn't need to be, but the difference is not just a few bucks... and my phone has a replacable battery, a real keypad, and iSync likes it just fine.

      I do my smart stuff on a separate PDA, which also syncs nicely, and has a better screen than the iPhone, and has multiple times the runtime of any cellphone... and hasn't lost data or required me to migrate to new software since I got my first PDA in 2000. I've been through four carriers at three jobs in that time, and none of them were compatible with each other. Don't know what I'm going to do when it dies, though, given Palm's slow suicide. I can't see a single handheld on the market now (phone or otherwise) that I really like.

      Not excluding the iPhone and iPod touch.

      Put another way, would every other manufacturer be trying to put out an iPhone killer if they didn't see it as a major threat?

      Wrong question. The right question is, "would every other manufacturer be trying to put out an iPhone killer if it wasn't a major threat". The answer to that question is "well, sure, companies make really stupid decisions all the time". Heard anything about "Mac mini killers" lately from the companies who thought that the size of the Mac mini rather than the fact that it was the cheapest way to get a Mac was the real draw?

      Or look at the companies trying to make iPod-alikes instead of making the best music player they could, because they have no clue what's really the key to the iPod's success.

  28. failback? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Phone Geeks. Your wisdom please:

    Are people that do not live within a 3G service area completely SOL, or will it fall back to Good'ol Edge?

    1. Re:failback? by Schmool · · Score: 1

      According to the Stevenote, there will still be a 2G radio in the new iPhone, so where there's no 3G, it should revert to Edge.

    2. Re:failback? by _Hiro_ · · Score: 1

      The tech specs list EDGE as a supported network, so yes, it is 3G/EDGE both.

      --
      -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
    3. Re:failback? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 3G web page still mentions edge (and states 10 hour talk time w/ 2G, 5 hour talk time w/ 3G), so it may support both.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  29. Re:Holy crap no a2dp AGAIN? by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    I think that's available for third parties to create.

    Seth

  30. Re:EBay is happy! by bsDaemon · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you buy Apple hardware early, you're a sucker. this happens with practically all of their products. They should know better by now.

    Of course, I guess there have to be early-adopters for them to bring out the good, cheap 2nd version.

  31. Re:EBay is happy! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have an iPhone 1.0 and bought it knowing that I don't live in a 3G area (that and GPS are the only new things I won't be able to get). That's like saying anyone who owned anything prior to a new version coming out is going to feel stupid. If anything I would think that geeks understand that technology usually a) moves at a quick pace and b) gets more features and usually goes down in price over time.

  32. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Unwilling" is always your problem and nobody else's.

  33. MMS by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    Still no MMS support? Count me out. That's something I gotta have! Sending to email is not sufficient.

    1. Re:MMS by IrrepressibleMonkey · · Score: 1

      I don't think that Apple is interested in MMS.

      Surely, a fully functional email client makes MMS obsolete? More and more companies offer the ability to send MMS from email.

      I've never really used my MMS and when I have, I've had a mix of disappointing result - including the recipient being sent a message telling them to download the MMS from the web.

      In my opinion MMS never got off the ground and won't be missed.

    2. Re:MMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friends use MMS to send pictures. They can't be bothered to figure out how to e-mail pictures to me. Meh, I will miss it.

    3. Re: MMS by IrrepressibleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm pretty sure you'll still get your friends pictures.

      You'll get an SMS message that says "Hey, your friend just sent you an MMS - view it from this webpage..."

      You'll click the link on your shiny new iPhone and see the MMS. You won't miss a thing.

      (At least that's how most networks in the UK handle MMS messages for users without MMS...)

    4. Re:MMS by stokessd · · Score: 1

      A full featured (non .mac) email client doesn't equal MMS. MMS is push and happens in seconds, email gets checked at 15 minute or longer intervals. Plus sending photos to phones on verizon is unreliable at best.

      MMS is more akin to iChat than email.

      I am pretty sure that apple isn't interested in MMS either, but my friends and family still are, so rather than try to educate them as to why my phone sucks (in their eyes) and how to kludge a workaround, I'd really like my shiny Jesus Phone to actually do what I want it to do. I'm sure apple would love to poach RIM clients, but this is my personal phone and I don't care at all about exchange support. I'd jettison that in a heartbeat for mms and an XMPP chat client.

      Sheldon

  34. Obligatory by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yes, but will it run Li... Wow, that's pretty cool. Sweet touch screen. Look at it flip, awesome! Gotta get me one of those!

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  35. Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and will by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and will it work in the us.

  36. AT&T? by DirePickle · · Score: 0

    What contract do you have to sign to get those prices? Do I have to pay $100/month to AT&T? For how long? Fifty years?

  37. Re:EBay is happy! by papna · · Score: 1

    Early adopters pay more. That's how it works. When your manufacturer releases a new product a year later that's cheaper, you have no, no place to complain.

  38. Huh? by msauve · · Score: 1

    You can buy GPS's all day, as many as you want, for under $100. Here's one. Here's another.

    And no monthly service fee, or penalty for early cancellation.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Huh? by jollespm · · Score: 1

      I think the parent was referring to a GPS offers mapping/route finding capabilities. Knowing where you are isn't that helpful if you don't have a map to tell you where to go...

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but $94.89, and $89.95 (down from RRP of $149.99) don't really support your case as well as you may like.

      Where's the $50 one?

  39. Re:fp! by mustafap · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, you must have posted that on a v1 iPhone.

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  40. Re:EBay is happy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shh... don't interrupt his gloating, he thinks he's won something...

  41. cant wait by kiwilake · · Score: 1

    as i sit here watching the live update on my iphone, all i can think of is how i cant wait to watch the live update of a future iphone 3 on this new iphone 2

    --
    sink, swim, score and be happy :D
  42. Re:if you have an iPhone 1.0, how stupid do feel? by lanky+nibbs · · Score: 1

    Me no do feel stupid now, as me has do been using iphone for.... Oh, screw the witty reply - it's been the best phone year of my life, and you are dumb.

    --
    "Have you heard of some type of thing?" -- anon
  43. Re:EBay is happy! by Rycross · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bought an iPhone at the $400 price, and I don't feel like a sucker. I bought it because I wanted the features that the iPhone had. I wanted a portable media player with a large screen for video that integrated with the software I was already using for my music (iTunes). I wanted to be able to use my gmail account with it. I wanted to do IM (Meebo.com). I wanted a good UI (I hate the Windows Mobile UI). $400 was pretty steep, but in the end I felt it was worth it.

    I don't feel bitter at all about this. I knew when I bought the first iPhone that there would be another version a year or so down the line. It was just common sense. But I didn't want to wait, so I paid a premium. Thats not a big deal for me.

    If I can get one for $200 with my current plan, though, I'd be really tempted to get the 3G.

  44. Re:EBay is happy! by Firehed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bought my iPhone on day three (hey, I'm not stupid enough to buy launch day only to find out there's a massive bug) for $600. I'm quite happy still. See, unlike the rest of the world, I haven't had to put up with a shitty cell phone for the past year.

    Tech gets cheaper over time. I'm more pissed that I once spent $50 for a 30-pack of CD-R blanks and only had eight or so work after waiting half an hour to find out the burn failed, only to now be able to buy discs that burn in a minute for fifteen cents apiece with 99% reliability. At least my 1.0 iPhone worked properly at launch and continues to do so :)

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  45. What the frak? by Grendel_Prime · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that the iPod Touch will be $99 and $199 for 8GB and 16GB? It's been stated by El Jobso before that the price points would be $100 less than the comparable iPhone capacity.

    1. Re:What the frak? by argent · · Score: 1

      Only if you can get a cellphone company to subsidize them, I suspect.

  46. Re:EBay is happy! by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

    I have an iPhone, and this doesn't really bother me at all. I fully expect hardware to be upgraded.

    Not to take away from your pleasure, of course. I understand that you're likely a bitter, lonely asshat who only feels joy when he can make others suffer, however inconsequentially. I suggest a career in middle management, you'll probably find immense happiness being in that position of tiny power.

  47. Perspective people. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Funny

    Before everyone goes on a diatribe about what the new iPhone doesn't have or what it doesn't do, remember the long history of the iPod. The first iPod isn't anything special compared to the last several generations. If there are features that you would like to have or features you don't like, just wait and a newer version might address it. It's funny watching the intensity of fanboys and naysayers. If you don't like it, don't buy it. In summary here's the history and the naysayers.

    2001:
    Apple: Introducting the iPod: 1000 songs in your pocket.
    Naysayers:"No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame." Seriously who's going to buy this? It is Mac only, uses Firewire, and costs $400!!

    2002;
    Apple: iPod 2.0: Touch sensitive scroll wheel. Now compatible with Windows. Up to 20GB
    Naysayers: Okay, more space than a Nomad, but no wireless. Firewire only. Still expensive. Easily scratched

    2003:
    Apple: iPod 3.0: UI Redesign. Now USB compatible. Up to 40GB
    Naysayers:Still waiting for wireless. Still expensive. No video or photo capability. Really I need something smaller, maybe flash based. Easily scratched. Still expensive

    2004:
    Apple: iPod mini: Smaller version of iPod. 4 or 6 GB disk based. iPod 4.0. UI Redesign. Clickwheel. Up to 40GB. iPod 4.1: now with color and photo capability. Up to 60GB
    Naysayers:Still no wireless. Still expensive. No video. Maybe a phone/iPod combination would work. Easily scratched. Still expensive

    2005:
    Apple:iPod Shuffle: Ultra-portable iPod. Up to 1GB. iPod mini v2: New colors. iPod nano: Flash based. Color. Replacing mini. Up to 4GB. iPod 5.0: Now with video. Up to 80GB
    Naysayers:No screen on the shuffle. Small video screen on the iPod. And it's not a touch screen. Replace the profitable mini, are they insane? The nano scraches too easily! Still no wireless. When is Apple going to make an iPhone? Still expensive

    2006:
    Apple:iPod Shuffe: Even smaller. Metallic shell. Up to 2GB. iPod nano: New scratch-resistant metallic shell. More battery life. Up to 8GB.
    Naysayers:I can't use the new shuffle as a USB stick! Still no wireless or widescreen or touchscreen. No iPhone. Easily scratched. Still expensive

    January 2007:
    Apple:iPhone: multi-touch, widescreen iPod + mobile phone + internet browser + wireless
    Naysayers:I wanted the phone part to be separate. It's only on AT&T. It's not 3G. I can't buy music wirelessly. It's frickin' expensive.

    September 2007:
    Apple:iPod Touch: iPhone without the phone. iTunes Music Store built in. iPod nano: New form factor. Video. Up to 8GB. iPod Classic: Metallic shell. Up to 160GB
    Naysayers:iPhone is still only AT&T and not 3G. iPod touch is only 8GB and 16GB. And it's frickin' expensive.

    February 2008:
    Apple:iPod nano: new colors: iPod shuffle: new colors. iPouch Touch: 32GB available
    Naysayers:iPhone is still only AT&T and not 3G. iPod Touch and iPhone are still expensive

    June 2008:
    Apple:iPhone 2.0: 3G, GPS, Slimmer, faster, more apps. 8GB $199. 16GB $299
    Naysayers:iPhone is still only AT&T. Still expensive!!

    Fast forward to the future . . .
    2020:
    Apple:iPod femto: Size of a business card, but thinner. Direct neural interface. No charging, uranium battery last 5,000 years. Up to 500TB. iPhone X: Instantaneous, realtime language translation. Up to 20PB
    Naysayers:Should be 1PB. Neural interface is only in HD and not Extreme-HD. Should have used plutonium batteries that last 10,000 years. iPhone isn't 6G. Language translation only covers "major" languages and not Swahili. Still expensive.

    2021:
    Apple:iPod femto: Plutonium batteries. 1PB. iPhone XI: 6G. Language translation now includes Swahili.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Perspective people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what kind of universe is this where people criticize things.

    2. Re:Perspective people. by Auz · · Score: 5, Funny

      So... it's never going to play .ogg then...

      --
      =DIVIDE BY CUCUMBER ERROR: REINSTALL UNIVERSE AND REBOOT=
    3. Re:Perspective people. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      2022: Naysayers: Good riddance! It didn't work with every dialect of Swahili, anyhow. I told you this iPod thing would never take off!

      Great historical rundown. Possibly today's best comment.

    4. Re:Perspective people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean it doesn't play ATRAC3?!?! Me and my six friends definitely won't be buying this.

    5. Re:Perspective people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Having the phrase "Ogg Vorbis" in an Apple UI is against the design and ethical principles of the said corporation. It's simply an inhuman name for a file format.

    6. Re:Perspective people. by krelian · · Score: 1

      Just saying thank you. I had a good laugh.

    7. Re:Perspective people. by martinX · · Score: 1

      2021:
      Apple:iPod femto: Plutonium batteries. 1PB. iPhone XI: 6G. Language translation now includes Swahili.
      Naysayers:Neural interface is still HD. iPhone can't reach Pluto. Still expensive.
      Plutonium batteries? I bet you still have to send it in to Apple to replace them.
      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    8. Re:Perspective people. by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Actually, it might, if it runs the same firmware as current. Zodttd ported vlc.

    9. Re:Perspective people. by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      Apple products have always catered to a specific group of people who *generally speaking* tend to care more about aesthetics than functionality. Try to understand I'm not trying to troll you, or call apple fans "shallow" -- just calling it how it is.

      While, for this reason, almost any apple product will ultimately be a success, that doesn't make criticisms of them any less valid nor does the products eventual success make it any more appealing to the people who originally criticized it -- they will almost certainly prefer other products.

      Some quick examples of failures in the Iphone: No mp3 as ringtones, no divx/xvid codec support for video, no copy/paste, no flash support, no front-facing camera, no video recording (I mean, wtf?).

      These are all *standard* things for most phones/video players, yet a device trying to be the best at both is missing so many basic things? What's worse, is that many of them could be EASILY implemented in software changes, but apple does not do it. Apple prefers to tell people what they want, rather than to listen to what people say they want.

      Does anyone remember how late apple was to the party with an mp3 player in the first place? What about how late they were to come out with an ipod that could do video -- Steve Jobs famously announced that people didn't want video playback in a portable device. Really? Thank god Steve Jobs was there to tell me what I didn't want, only to backpedal a year later.

      There's a lot of great stuff about the iphone. It's got a nice UI (nothing to write a sonnet about, but nice). Decent hardware (aside from the lack of front-facing camera) and some very nice apps (safari is hands down the best mobile browser). However, the glaring omissions are very off-putting to people who simply cannot imagine not having certain freedoms they have enjoyed no other phones for years.

      That said, many of the iphones weaknesses have been compensated by jailbreaking. Custom apps have filled in quite a few of apple's gaps already. So who knows, if the 3g iphone can still be jailbroken, then it might end up being a great phone -- instead of just the phone for people for people who care more about form than function.

    10. Re:Perspective people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah dammit.. Why Oh Why is there STILL NO BLUETOOTH!!!!!!!

    11. Re:Perspective people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2050 - I still can't run crysis on windows vista at a decent speed.

    12. Re:Perspective people. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I'm just pointing to the inanity of some people's expectations. When the iPod was released people, especially geeks, expected a lot of technical features some of which were not practical at the time. Some of the criticisms/features of the iPod were based on practical reasons. Wireless in 2001 was 802.11b if you could find a hotspot and it wasn't great for file transfer. Firewire really was the best way in wired transfer until USB 2.0 was more widespread. Also some of the limitations of a product are based on supply limitations. Apple only sold a few hundred thousand of the original iPod. Considering that the bought out all of the tiny 5GB HDs in the world, they probably couldn't have sold much more. Could they have deployed the video iPod sooner? I'm guessing that Steve didn't want to tip his hand as he was working out a deal to secure enough LCDs for the video iPod. Can the iPhone go to 64GB? Sure but considering the supply, it would be very pricey.

      You mention that Apple was late to the game with MP3 players. I think Apple was early compared to a lot of other people. There were very few ones out there and they were not all that great. Creative tried but frankly the Nomad was larger than a portable CD player at the time. I had a Diamond Rio. It worked fine. Music management and file transfer was a pain. What made the iPod different was the form factor and ease of use.

      Also bear in mind that Apple's modus operandi is not to stuff a lot of features into a product and hope that they work. Apple's style is more to get features working really well before deploying new ones. I think this is what Apple understood more than other companies. As long as other companies designed MP3 players to be geek gadgets and not consumer gadgets, they would never get wide appeal. They had to be designed for the average consumer. So they just have to work without much hassle. Also Apple updates their product line many times. Remember this is generation 2 of the iPhone. If the new iPod/iPhone doesn't have it, just wait.

      My other point is that if a product doesn't have a feature you want, and if that feature is really important to you, don't buy it. There's no need to get overly excited. Some people treat it as a matter of life and death that their MP3 player must play ogg-vorbis. In your case, your definition of basic cell phone features doesn't match everyone. I don't care about MP3 as ringtones. My grandmother doesn't care about text messaging. So what demographic should determine the feature set? Well most people would want text messaging. MP3 as ringtones? Considering that Verizon doesn't let me do it on my phone and no one is protesting outside their HQ, it's probably not a high priority. Video recording? I have it on my phone and I have never used it. You might say it's a simple software fix but I wouldn't know. Gandhi once said that we should be the change we want to see in the world. If you think these things are simple, then you should look into the new SDK.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    13. Re:Perspective people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "2020"
      "Apple:iPod femto ... No charging, uranium battery last 5,000 years"

      Uranium? Unlikely, more likely: No charging. Solar powered. And, of course ...

      Naysayers: "Solar power?? I live in my Mom's basement, you insensitive clod!!"

  48. Not bad, but I'll probably pass again by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that it maxes out at 16GB's still. I was expecting 32GB's. I'm a bit disappointed that once again there is no camera on the front to allow for video conferencing. And it still looks like you can't use it as a modem for your laptop.

    I'm using a Palm Centro right now and while I think it sucks compared to the iPhone, its pretty valuable in that I can connect my MacBook Pro to it to get Internet connectivity. And since I pretty much carry my laptop with me everywhere, the value of the iPhone is somewhat diminished for me. Plus, my wife and I are on Sprint's employee plan and we pay a combined $60 a month for unlimited data.

    1. Re:Not bad, but I'll probably pass again by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      And it still looks like you can't use it as a modem for your laptop.

      This doesn't surprise me in the slightest, it's most likely at the request of the networks. My current T-Mobile contract explicitly states that I'm not allowed to use my SIM with a computer. It's by no means something that's unique to the iPhone.

    2. Re:Not bad, but I'll probably pass again by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Even when it's not explicitly denied by the contract (I don't remember seeing it in there, but that was almost 2 years ago now and that contract was huge and in tiny print) they don't tell you how to do it. Luckily google is your friend and I've been able to use my Blackberry pearl as both a teathered (USB) and bluetooth modem for my laptop. It's pretty handy on the road, although I am required by law to point out that EDGE is slow (120kbps typically, with moderately high latency).

      Still, it's plenty usable. My Wife's iPhone on the other hand has absolutely no tethered modem support unless you jailbreak the thing and do some hacking.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  49. YEEEEARGH! by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

    I'm an ATT&T customer, but I've got a Pay-As-You-Go plan. I'm guessing that I can't work that with an iPhone.

    (The PAYGO plan costs me <$20 a month. I just don't use a cell phone enough to make it worth $60 a month, which was the cheapest plan available for iPhone v1.)

    1. Re:YEEEEARGH! by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

      I was the same. For about 4 months, and then I realized it was that one friend that would screw it up. After that I decided it'd be best just to get a plan since then I'd have peace of mind and not be another one of those cellphone users bitching about my minutes -_-'

      But there are times when I wish I wasn't borderline between the two since I don't use my plan to its full extent. Hell, I'm planning to get a second line as a family plan sharing the minutes and give it to my mom to use since she'll probably use more than I will, though probably not by much -_-;

    2. Re:YEEEEARGH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -_-'

      -_-; Kawaii! ^_^

      I'll stick to my Pay As You Go. Contracts are kuso.
    3. Re:YEEEEARGH! by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

      You do that. That suits you.

      Although no iphone for you >.

    4. Re:YEEEEARGH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad because I'm really interested in modding iPhones. I wish those baka at ATT and Apple weren't so deredere for contracts. X_X

      Oh well, I'll get something Linux-based instead. At least that will have modding potential AAAND won't be locked down and bricked by proprietary junk. KITA-----------(^_^)------------!

      Ja ne. I'm off home to see mai waifu Meru Otonashi! She knows about this stuff.

    5. Re:YEEEEARGH! by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

      Nobody said that an iPhone bought _must_ be activated.
      I do not doubt they'll be jailbroken just as easily so it's just really just a matter of time.

      And, wtf, you say you're interested in moding iPhones then something as small as that shouldn't stop you.

      Anyway, any real modder would probably buy both

    6. Re:YEEEEARGH! by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      RASENGANNNNNNNN!!!!!

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    7. Re:YEEEEARGH! by kiwipeso · · Score: 1

      iPhone will work with prepay, at least on vodafone in the rest of the world.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  50. Re:EBay is happy! by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2, Informative

    I own an early iPhone, and I'm a pretty damn happy camper. Don't know about you.

    When buying gadgets, you have to evaluate the value proposition as of the moment when you hand over the money. Holy shit, has this been a nice phone. When the 3G model is released, I will be lining up like a stereotypical fanboy, because the 1.0 hardware's ownership experience has been an exceptionally good one.

  51. NOT slimmer by partycrasher · · Score: 5, Informative

    The iPhone 3G is NOT slimmer - not if you look at the depth. In fact it is a couple of mm's thicker than the predecessor The 3G tech spec page says Height: 4.5 inches (115.5 mm) Width: 2.4 inches (62.1 mm) Depth: 0.48 inch (12.3 mm) Weight: 4.7 ounces (133 grams Old tech spec: Height: 4.5 inches (115 mm) Width: 2.4 inches (61 mm) Depth: 0.46 inch (11.6 mm) Weight: 4.8 ounces (135 grams)

    1. Re:NOT slimmer by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 3G is NOT slimmer - not if you look at the depth. In fact it is a couple of mm's thicker than the predecessor No....that's not a fact, sorry.

      It's actually only 0.7mm thicker, not "a couple of mm's".

    2. Re:NOT slimmer by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      If you can actually perceive a 0.6 variation, I salute you.

      You are correct that the new model is no smaller than the old one, but for all intents and purposes, the two models are the same size and weight.

      (I would have preferred to have expressed the thickness difference in terms of micrometers, but slashdot doesn't seem to like 'mu's)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:NOT slimmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A person 7' tall @ 200 LB is slimmer than 5' @ 200 LB. His dimensions are bigger yet he is slimmer. Don't you just love marketing?

    4. Re:NOT slimmer by kencurry · · Score: 1

      The iPhone 3G is NOT slimmer - not if you look at the depth.

      In fact it is a couple of mm's thicker than the predecessor

      The 3G tech spec page says
      Height: 4.5 inches (115.5 mm)
      Width: 2.4 inches (62.1 mm)
      Depth: 0.48 inch (12.3 mm)
      Weight: 4.7 ounces (133 grams

      Old tech spec:
      Height: 4.5 inches (115 mm)
      Width: 2.4 inches (61 mm)
      Depth: 0.46 inch (11.6 mm)
      Weight: 4.8 ounces (135 grams) you math is off:

      just measured mine iPhone at .46 inch (it's right). If 3g is .48 inch, that is 0.020 inch or 0.5 mm.

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    5. Re:NOT slimmer by ari_j · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wait ... 12.3 - 11.6 = 0.7. Does the definition of "a couple" now include 7/10 as a possible meaning?

      It's also possible that "slimmer" meant the average depth over the entire area of the device. Think of how much thinner something seems when the edges taper off compared to something the same maximum thickness but uniform thickness over its area. And remember, Apple cares a great deal about aesthetics.

    6. Re:NOT slimmer by pugdk · · Score: 1

      When apple makes a phone that will actually FIT into my pants pocket without making my pocket bulge like I'm some kind of loser having my wallet in there..... THEN I'll buy the iPhone.

      For now, its simply too friggin wide! and then I haven't even gotten into the whole "no keys" thingie.... ;-)

    7. Re:NOT slimmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have ever heard of Jobs' Mind Distortion Field?

      He said "it's thinner at the edges".

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Hey, I can't wait for the IPhone 3G knock-offs! by mustardayonnaise · · Score: 1

    I'm guess $99 for an 8gig model... LOL

    1. Re:Hey, I can't wait for the IPhone 3G knock-offs! by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      I'm guess $99 for an 8gig model... LOL It's still not quite to the level of good cracked phones like the HTC Mogul in terms of features, which does everything the new iPod does, has thousands of free third party apps, and a feature-complete browsers so you're not locked into the Safari supporting internet, but the Mogul feels clunkier than the iPhone.

      The mlb.com presentation was pretty funny. They say you can now watch games update in real time and also see video highlights as they occur (instead of after the game). Then they say that this is iPod exclusive, even though on a good smartphone you've been able to see the exact same thing all season, and the same thing minus video clips for years. The only exclusive part of it is that Safari can't load the mlb.com Gameday page correctly, so on the iPhone it requires a special little app to run.
      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  54. Re:Verizon by Relayman · · Score: 0

    Verizon is building out its network to support the iPhone. My understanding is that EV-DO is a 3G flavor of GSM so it should be compatible with the iPhone. Verizon is also opening up its network so you can use non-Verizon devices, such as the iPhone. Be patient, grasshopper.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  55. Not Slimmer by mapmaker · · Score: 1
    Featuring an even thinner profile


    No, it's actually a little thicker than the outgoing model. But hey, you can't expect to get all the details right when you post a keynote summary before the keynote has actually ended.

  56. Hah! by Dzimas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife and I both have prepaid phones that we use sparingly and our total cost is under $20/month. As we hit our 30s and started a family, our use patterns changed dramatically - we're no longer 20-something party animals who need to be yapping/smsing on the phone to everyone throughout the day. We saved almost $500 in cell charges last year without changing our behavior.

    1. Re:Hah! by randyest · · Score: 1

      Psst: not everyone has "settled down" and changed usage patterns the way you old fogies have. And a prepaid isn't suitable for everyone, even some who aren't "20-something party animals who need to be yapping/smsing on the phone to everyone throughout the day." This is your third or fourth tirade against cellphones/iphones in this thread! Jeez, bitter much?

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Hah! by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      I'm not bitter - just trying to point out that this stuff is really expensive and largely unnecessary. I went through the Newton, the Palm, a dozen cellphones and heaven knows what other stuff. It all seemed brilliant at the time, but in hindsight it was just mindless consumerism. You'll figure it out in a few years, too. :)

    3. Re:Hah! by randyest · · Score: 1

      Riight. Your subjective opinion based on your specific needs really applies to everyone, we're just not "mature" enough to know it yet. Get real.

      --
      everything in moderation
    4. Re:Hah! by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sorry. That was overly paternalistic of me. All I was just trying to communicate is that I've wasted a lot of money on gadgets in the past and if I had the chance to do it all again, I wouldn't bother.

    5. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess What: Nobody cares about you or your dumb family.

  57. Where's the Ounce? by argent · · Score: 1

    So, is *anyone* providing coverage of Snow Leopard?

    1. Re:Where's the Ounce? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      No, because the session on it is going on RIGHT NOW.

      And it's under NDA. So no obvious live feeds.

      In a couple days, a few developers will leak something, don't worry.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  58. Re: NOT Slimmaer by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    Mod the parent up as informative for letting us know that the new version is thicker than the old one.

    My question is: Does the new version support flash? Can it now use the real internet or is it still locked to the Flashless Safari internet?

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  59. fail by TheAngryIntern · · Score: 1

    no increased internal capacity = epic fail.

  60. Hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Er, no. Given past pricing strategies I humbly suggest that if the US tag is $199, it will in fact by £199 and â199.

  61. Re:Verizon by Kingrames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No it isn't.
    It is a symptom of a larger problem.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  62. Re:EBay is happy! by jmauro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's actually true of all products. DVD players we're like $1000 when they first came out now they're like $50.

  63. Apparently no longer sold online by kju · · Score: 1

    The "Where to buy" page (http://www.apple.com/iphone/buy/) no longer lists it as available through the online apple store. Apparently it will only be available through apple or AT&T stores, so they will likely force you to sign a AT&T contact when buying the phone. It seems this is their answer to the hacks which allowed activation of the iPhone without getting a AT&T contact.

    1. Re:Apparently no longer sold online by kju · · Score: 1

      Contract, not contact, of course.

    2. Re:Apparently no longer sold online by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Considering it won't be available until July 11, I'm not suprised you can't order it online yet.

    3. Re:Apparently no longer sold online by kju · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that to be the reason. All pages state "AT&T Stores" and "Apple RETAIL Stores". The layout of the page mentioned by me leaves no room for a link to the online store, and when the store was available shortly after the update there still was a link to the Apple Online Store which is now gone. And the fact that it says "AT&T Stores" but explicitely adds "Retail" when mentioning Apple Stores is enough of a hint.

    4. Re:Apparently no longer sold online by phuul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or it could be even simpler. They will have a limited supply and would rather give it to the brick and mortar Apple Stores and AT&T stores. Now they may force you to sign a contract, but since under the current system you already do that with the iTunes then I don't know how anything has changed. It may be as you say but based on the roll out last year it's more about lines outside of stores and perception of demand.

  64. Re:Verizon by neocrono · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm pretty sure EV-DO is distinctly CDMA. It's the only 3G option here in Corvallis, OR right now, and it's provided by Sprint, who deals exclusively in CDMA.

  65. How do you buy it??? by teneighty · · Score: 1

    There's no "buy" or preorder button on the Apple store. I want this thing, but there's no way in hell am I going to rush some store for it.

    1. Re:How do you buy it??? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Well, you don't yet; it's not out until 7/11. At that time you may walk into an Apple or AT&T store and buy one. No need to "rush."

      --
      everything in moderation
  66. Re:Verizon by peragrin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Verizon uses CDMA technology instead of the world-wide GSM. hence a verizon phone will only ever work on a verizon network.

    The data service will still be limited to verizon only phones. Sorry but if your stuck on Verizon your screwed. AT&T suks but at least they use GSM. So you can switch to t-mobile in the USA.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  67. Re:EBay is happy! by beef+curtains · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would I feel stupid? I've had a great phone/iPod/EDGE web-surfing gadget for a year, and have enjoyed it thoroughly. Once the new one is available for sale, I'll have a great phone/iPod/3G web-surfing gadget which I'm sure I'll enjoy just as thoroughly, and my wife will inherit the EDGE version (her old Motorola U6 is long overdue for a replacement anyway).

    What makes you think I would expect innovation to come to a grinding halt just because I've spent a bit of cash on a gadget? I bought the iPhone with the understanding that it would be replaced with a newer, more-feature-packed model sooner rather than later (taking into account the almost-annual new-iPod release cycle).

    What would you recommend to folks considering the iPhone 3G? That they hold off on buying it, because it's eventually going to be replaced by a cooler model anyway?

    --
    Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
  68. Re:Verizon by Sciros · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rubbish. If potential customers are *unwilling* to buy a product, it is the vendor's problem. More so than the consumers', even.

    If I am unwilling to purchase an XBox 360 for whatever reason, opting instead for a PS3, is that really my problem? No, if it's anyone's it's Microsoft's.

    --
    I like basketball!!1!
  69. Who's covering it? by argent · · Score: 1

    I guess you missed the announcement of the next keynote, all about SnowLeopard... Starting right now, in fact :)

    And who's covering it? Nobody.

    1. Re:Who's covering it? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      Of course not, duh! It's under NDA.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  70. Re:if you have an iPhone 1.0, how stupid do feel? by zen_sky · · Score: 1

    Me no do feel stupid now, as me has do been using iphone for.... Oh, screw the witty reply - it's been the best phone year of my life, and you are dumb. Yep, me like it too, makes every other handset look and feel like a joke.
  71. WTF is MMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, I'm 30. what the hell is mms?

    1. Re:WTF is MMS by Rinisari · · Score: 1

      Multimedia Message Service. It's what's used to send pictures and video phone-to-phone. Without support for it, iPhone users have to send pictures and video to a non-iPhone user's phone's email address, which is longer and a pain in the ass to type or remember (could save it, but that's another bit of information). MMS is essentially email, but it handles the @provider section automatically.

    2. Re:WTF is MMS by Rinisari · · Score: 1

      Oh, and non-iPhone users can't send pictures and video to iPhone users--they don't even get a link to click to see it or anything.

  72. Re:Verizon by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

    EV-DO is a data only technology, it complements Verizon's existing CDMA voice networks. And despite Verizon allowing non-Verizon devices on their network, it still has to be a CDMA device, which the iPhone isn't.

    --
    End of Line.
  73. Re:Verizon by limaxray · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, EV-DO is a flavor of Qualcomm's CDMA2000, not GSM. That article is simple talking about Verizon upgrading their EV-DO network to the newer and faster Rev A version.

    What is happening though is Verizon will be switching to a GSM technology called LTE for their 4G network. So maybe with the next iteration of the iPhone will be available on Verizon. But until then, I'll stick with my HTC 6800 and a network that actually has 3G coverage.
  74. All Your base belong to US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet, slick, good looking, and fully controlled by FairPlay DRM. No, not only music, but ALL apps on it. Thing twice, befor jumping into deep **^&...

    Artur

  75. Re:Verizon by _Hiro_ · · Score: 1

    Everything I've read says that GSM and EV-DO are NOT cross-compatible, even though they're both 3G. I think you're reading more into that PCWorld article than is actually there....

    --
    -Pope Peter Porker, S.O.W., K.M.K.R., U.G.O.A., F.S.G.S.D.
  76. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by maxume · · Score: 1

    Maybe he has plenty of disposable income. There are people who spend thousands of dollars for seats at sporting events, but they are generally in the 'set for life' category rather than the 'sucker' category. Same thing could be true for people who like gadgets.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  77. Re:EBay is happy! by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    I think that the differences in functionality between DVD and VHS were substantially different than the difference between an iPhone and Blackberry or whateverhaveyou.

    I don't really see anything that great about the iPhone (or anything else from Apple, really) from where I sit, but I suppose its a matter of personal preference.

  78. early buyers impress girlfirends & got "laid" by peter303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They could show off to their girlfriends they were cool like Steve and had money to throw away.

  79. Re:Verizon by quanticle · · Score: 1

    Nonsense. If "unwilling" were solely the consumer's problem, then there'd be no pressure on the vendor to make a product that consumers are willing to buy.

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  80. Use in multiple countries? by spagiola · · Score: 1

    OK, so the iPhone is or will be available in lots and lots of countries. But if I have an iPhone bought in one country, can I use it in another WITHOUT using horrendously expensive international roaming, by plugging in a country-specific SIM chip or some other means? THAT's what I need to know -- not that I can buy a brand new iPhone there.

    1. Re:Use in multiple countries? by olafva · · Score: 1

      Yes! I just did it for 2 months in Europe. Unlocked via one "Do it all" click on ziphone.com after which I used any of my SIM cards for different countries. A no brainer. Also, you v=can make Skype calls via fring.com

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    2. Re:Use in multiple countries? by olafva · · Score: 1

      ziphone.org that is (Free)

      --
      What's past is NOT ALWAYS prologue for the future!
    3. Re:Use in multiple countries? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Why do you keep replying with this exact message every time anyone mentions unlocking?

      There's no way in hell ziphone will work with the new iphone. It won't even work with the v2 software on the old iphone.

      Zibri is stuck with the code he stole. No way he's going to come up with anything new - that would require actual work.

  81. 3g Speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New 3g iphone speed:

    Time to download lonelyplanet.com.

    Edge: 48 seconds.

    3g: 20 seconds.

    Comcast (!!!) 5 seconds.

    Priceless?

  82. Steve just sent "hit squad" to your address by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do you think he put GPS in the new phones? So he could more quickly find dissenters like you. (I have visions of police from Minority Report descending from copters...)

  83. Re:Verizon by darkgreen · · Score: 1

    It's both - for example, not willing to be a slave is a very specific problem to an individual, as well as a greater problem. Although you can get into differing grades of importance (unwilling to have kids educated with others that don't share religion, or unwilling to eat at McDonald's when all of your friends go out), there's always the subjective and personal implications that people call up when they use the phrase "I'm unwilling to..."

    It's just being contrary to say that someone's opinion of unsuitability is shared by nobody.

    Besides, there's no indication that the original poster said he/she was speaking for anybody else.

    --
    You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
  84. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by IrrepressibleMonkey · · Score: 1

    Yeah, last week my mate spent $200 on a hooker...

    Sucker. I can sort myself out for nothing! And now I've got the cash for an iPhone.

  85. more "small print," my car requires gas to work! by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

    I hate how cell phone companies bury the fact that you need ongoing service buried.

  86. Not slimmer by mhmehkri · · Score: 0

    Dimensions from Engadget -

    Model
    Weight (grams) Size (mm)

    iPhone 3G
    133 115.5 x 62.1 x 12.3
    iPhone (EDGE)
    135 115 x 61 x 11.6
    HTC Touch Diamond
    110 102 x 51 x 11.35
    HTC Touch Pro
    165 102 x 51 x 18.05
    Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
    158 110 x 52.6 x 17

    The best part has been the price. Let hope the iPhone dev team gets to work soon and comes up with a way to unlock this.

  87. Quick, big picture analysis by Catalina588 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    iPhone 2.0: Apple will do in two years what took five years with iPod. That is, build a multi-billion dollar, global, sustainable, profitable business from scratch.

    Apple listened to developers and enterprise customers in nailing the iPhone feature list. No objections or gripes here.

    The 3G iPhone pricing is very un-Apple in being very attractive and without an obvious price premium. In fact, it is priced for mass-market consumption right now. That means there will be millions out there a year from now. And the ecosystem/market will flock to this high-profile platform, in turn creating even more pull.

    The stock is down today about 4%. Why Jim Cramer is saying "sell on the news" is beyond me. AAPL is going to be a lot bigger and more profitable a year from now.

    There is no technology risk here, so sit back and watch one of the great technology markets of a lifetime unfold.

    1. Re:Quick, big picture analysis by thisismyid · · Score: 1

      Apple stock almost always falls the day of a big announcement.

    2. Re:Quick, big picture analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone 2.0 will take the corporate world by...uh...a slight drizzle. Enterprise has standardized on Crackberry, Apple is late to the dance.

      Sure, all the technoids on /. think a corporate video/mp3 phone would be great, but your average CEO ain't buyin', mark my words......

    3. Re:Quick, big picture analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think about it, Apple took seven years to make the iPhone what it is. The iPhone wouldn't even have been possible without the iPod.

    4. Re:Quick, big picture analysis by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      It is considered good form to disclose the existence (if not the size of) positions when publishing stock analysis.

  88. Re:Verizon by darkgreen · · Score: 5, Funny

    quick summary of the posts in this thread, by first sentence:

    "Unwilling"
    No it isn't.
    Rubbish.
    Nonsense.

    --
    You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
  89. Re:Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and wi by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and will it work in the us. AFAIK, you can't prevent a GSM phone from working in [Country] unless the carriers in [Country] blacklist the IMEI #.

    GSM is much better than CDMA because of its interoperability.
    Insert SIM card & talk.

    Some overseas iPhones will be sold unlocked (France I know for sure), but unlocking the phone is so easy, I don't see why it should be a problem if it's sold unlocked or not.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  90. Re:Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and wi by lmpeters · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last I heard, unlocked iPhones were being sold in France, but they're significantly more expensive than the locked iPhones. When I crunched the numbers a few months ago, I think the cost came to over $1,000 USD (probably even more now, since the dollar is still getting weaker compared to the euro).

    In addition, Apple won't provide support for iPhones outside their country of purchase, so if anything goes wrong with it, you'd have to make an international trip just to get it serviced.

  91. The beginning of the end by mikwebb · · Score: 1

    Is the end of the iphone? Its no longer exclusive, i can see it fading like the razr. Hell all good things have to come to a end.

    1. Re:The beginning of the end by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      You are making it sound like the only appeal of the iPhone is that its new and thus a "fad". You're totally ignoring the quality of the software on it, the user interface or all the apps that are coming for it.

      So no, its not like that one trick pony RAZR.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:The beginning of the end by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Since when has exclusivity had anything to do with it's popularity?

    3. Re:The beginning of the end by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Less space than a Nomad?

  92. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it isn't.
    It is a symptom of a larger problem. Yeah, it's not like they could sell very many units with that kind of restriction;-)

    Quote Wiki;
    "They sold 270,000 iPhones in the first 30 hours on launch weekend."
  93. Re:Verizon by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

    I was talking to my local Cellular provider (Telus) and was asking about things, and it came up that Telus is working on a 3G network that is based on W-CDMA. The guy that worked for Telus said that new phones designed to work on W-CDMA would also work on GSM based systems.

    I don't know if that means that GSM phones will also work on W-CDMA, or even if he was correct at all. If anyone knows though, it would be someone here. If you know, enlighten us, or at least correct me :)

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  94. Geohashing by ndansmith · · Score: 1

    Is this not the perfect platform for geohashing?

  95. How much are the 3G iPhones if I already have AT&a by Sparky9292 · · Score: 1

    Just curious..

    My wife has a 16GB iPhone and I have some craptacular LG CU575 flip phone. What will be the price for me if I'm already on the AT&T and just want the iPhone? (I'm betting full price of $500).

    *sigh*

  96. Re:EBay is happy! by ndansmith · · Score: 1

    Only hardware upgrades like GPS and 3G won't be. Someday when the iPhone has nanotech the hardware upgrades will be included.
  97. MMS? Cut and paste?! by Aiku1337 · · Score: 1

    Ok, they listened to customers, but they didn't hear anything about MMS? Is it such a difficult feature to add? How about cut and paste?!

  98. Re:EBay is happy! by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1
    I won't feel like a sucker if my wife lets me upgrade :-( :-)

    I bought an iPhone at the $400 price, and I don't feel like a sucker.
    --
    Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
  99. Att Down by saberlogic_ja · · Score: 1

    It looks like all this press isn't the best thing for att.com, they are "Down for maintenance"

  100. WTF Can't Buy Online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok. So I hear the news on the radio that the new $199 IPHONE will be available in July. After trying mightily for a half-hour, I finally get through on Apple's overloaded website server. I have my credit card in hand, and I'm ready to buy - even if it means waiting till July. But there's no option to buy online. I don't need or want to find an Apple retail store, nor do I have the time, and I refuse to find a brick and mortar AT&T mobile phone retailer, where I will have to deal with a slick, commissioned salesman who won't know as much about the product as I do. I just want to buy the phone online, lock myself into a 2 year contract with AT&T, and wait for my new phone to come in the mail.

    Apple has just made a critical error. Starting with the trouble I had accessing their website, and now finding out I can't just click and buy online, I've had enough time to take a cold shower, stop and catch my breath, and I'll just wait until the second generation of the new 3G phones comes out on the market, after all the bugs have been worked out in the first round of new IPHONES. Some other guy can be the first sucker to Woot. Nevermind.

  101. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by randyest · · Score: 1

    Maybe, but generally those who are "set" don't bother posting long-winded justifications of their expenses on forums like /. ;)

    --
    everything in moderation
  102. And tell us... by msauve · · Score: 1

    does an iPhone 3G include internal maps and routing capabilities?

    Or will routing be an additional cost from a third party? Will maps cost extra, or even be available internally, or will it depend upon pulling the local area from the web? How much good will that do if you're lost in the backcountry, where you're lucky to have cell coverage, let alone 3G data.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:And tell us... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It currently uses Google Maps, but it doesn't offer live routing because the accuracy of the "guess where you are based on your signal strength to the towers) system is nowhere near what you'd need to actually navigate. I'm not sure if the GPS enabled version will have turn by turn directions or not, but there is no technical reason they couldn't.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:And tell us... by jollespm · · Score: 1

      And how exactly would the eTrex unit you linked to help? It doesn't have a base map. It doesn't have a cell phone either. That unit is good for back woods use and geocaching.

      Google maps does route finding, but I don't know if it will to dynamic route finding or turn by turn directions. From the demo, all they showed was watching your position on the map. Not the most useful, but I'm sure it will do more than that, if not now, then soon.

      Oh, and those people that got stuck in the snow, they weren't lost, they got stuck. They needed to be able to call a tow truck. The best mapping software in the world wouldn't have helped them. They needed to be better prepared for the trip they were making, and needed to be smart about where to go once it started snowing. Maybe they should have gotten a SPOT device, that would have saved one life.

  103. Re:Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and wi by lmpeters · · Score: 1

    Some overseas iPhones will be sold unlocked (France I know for sure), but unlocking the phone is so easy, I don't see why it should be a problem if it's sold unlocked or not.

    Remember the jailbroken iPhones? There were a few software updates that bricked them, so unlocking a locked iPhone might be risky.

    Apple claimed the bricking happened because the jailbreaking process damaged the iPhones in some way. A lot of people suspected that Apple in fact deliberately bricked them. I don't know if anyone conclusively proved it one way or the other (I don't have an iPhone, so I didn't follow it closely).

  104. Re:Verizon by Anpheus · · Score: 1

    Nationwide 3G coverage provided by AT&T by the end of this month to early next month, I believe.

    They've been upgrading their network.

  105. Re:This is also likely to... by analog_line · · Score: 1

    Or Sprint. My father has been desperate for a good excuse to kick Sprint to the curb and buy and iPhone, and this is just about as good an excuse as he's likely to find. I may very well find myself with one of the new iPhones, even though I don't have a lot of use for it, or desire for one.

  106. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by TibbonZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I should clarify that I'm not rich, but I just knew what I was getting into when I bought it. Never have I purchased a piece of consumer technology to have it go up in price and decrease in features as time went on. I expected the price to drop and the features increase. Again, compare the Apple Lisa at $21K vs a Mac Pro at $2500.

    I count the money as "spent". It's not an investment piece and I feel that I've gotten my money worth just in its use. Again I needed a new phone and a new iPod anyway. The iPod was going to be $300 or so and a new phone around a hundred. Well worth it. However I should disclose that I wrote it off as a business expense on my taxes.

    No one should have bought a $400 phone in this economy without being able to count it as "gone" without massive financial impact. I did see a lot of people buying this phone that shouldn't have and couldn't afford it- stupid idea.

    This is about having proper expectations when you purchase technology. Also a device (should) do the same features that it does on day one and provide similar value. My Commodore 64 still does what it did in 1983, and still provides that value regardless of what else is out there or on the current pricing of them.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  107. Canada Release Date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Apple website says Canada is in the list of countries that get the 3G iPhone on July 11. I guess that means Rogers, since they're the only GSM network (since they bought Fido).

    I read that the US AT&T unlimited data plans were $20/mo. Browsing through rogers.com I see that $25/mo gets you some text messages and 4MB of data. The closest to "unlimited" is $100/mo and you get 1GB of data. In both the AT&T and Rogers cases these are on top of your regular monthly bill for voice.

    Rogers need to dial its prices back to about 1/10 of what they are now if they want to be in line with the US.

    1. Re:Canada Release Date by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Ya that's my concern, I've been following this for awhile. right now I have $50 unlimited here in Canada on an ancient Fido plan. If I swap plans I pretty have to turn data off unless I want to spend a fortune. They were talking about downloading from the apple store to your phone, via cell, as long as it's under 10 megs in size. Well unless your spending $100 for data and nothing for voice, the current plans won't allow it. I really have NO idea how Rogers is going to be able to offer the iPhone and continue to screw us over like they do. I'm waiting for the shoe to drop up here.

    2. Re:Canada Release Date by shking · · Score: 1
      I won't be buying an iPhone unless Rogers' prices are pretty damn close to AT&T's:
      1. New Customers - $60/mo - Unlimited Data (email & web) - 200 SMS messages - 450 anytime minutes - 5000 night & weekend minutes - Rollover minutes
      2. Existing Customers' data plan - $20/mo - Unlimited Data (email & web) - 200 more SMS messages
      --
      -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
    3. Re:Canada Release Date by dadragon · · Score: 1

      I won't be getting an iPhone unless I can drive from Saskatoon to Swift Current without losing service.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  108. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whoopty fucking do, another apple product, lets rush out and get it to make sure we're smuggier then the last fanboi

  109. Re:EBay is happy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure it is a matter of personal preference. I'd seen blackberries and various other cell phones with keypads and what-not, but when I saw the iPhone it made me feel old. Not tired or such, but it gave me it made me think "Wow, I can't believe all of this has finall come together." Music, phone, text, web, all in a pretty darn good interface. I'd never gotten that feeling with any other similar device.

    I have plenty of complaints and quibbles as a user of an iPhone, but it's such a useful device to have around and I've yet to see a competitor come close. One funny thing is if it had come out a year earlier, when I was commuting in a car and living in the city I'd lived in for seven years and had a rather routine existence, I probably wouldn't have cared as much. My parents bought me a first-gen iPod back in the day and I used it a handful of times before I realized it was pointless for me.

  110. Re:Verizon by telbij · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, but everyone has problems of differing sizes. Can you guess how big a problem this guy is to Apple?

  111. iPhone is more affordable, but the plan? by sjonke · · Score: 1

    I can afford the iPhone itself. In fact, I could afford the old $399 iPhone. What I can't afford is over $60 per month for the minimum plan (over $60 when you add in the various fees they tack on for fun). If they offered a $30 per month plan I would probably buy one. If they had a $20 plan, I'd be buying one now. I don't need a lot of talk time. In fact, I'd be willing to pay for every call as I so rarely make calls. I just want the unlimited data. Hell, give me no voice calls at all, no SMS, just data and I'll use my pay-as-you-go phone for the extremely infrequent calls I need to make with it.

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:iPhone is more affordable, but the plan? by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 1

      Pro Tip: If you don't know about something, don't talk about it. You can do all of those things with a v.1 iPhone. Data only activation has been available from AT&T for a few months now. Pay-as-you-go has always been an option for it.

  112. Re:Verizon by socz · · Score: 1

    hey, the ppc6800 (mogul for me) isn't so bad ass! It does everything i want it to (except sprint tv at the moment).

    With custom roms, i'm set!

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  113. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by maxume · · Score: 1

    Which is why I said plenty of disposable income. The point is that different people treat $500 differently, and for the ones that don't need to care (which probably includes plenty of people who are not 'set' when you are talking about $500), spending $500 does not a sucker make.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  114. Re: NOT Slimmaer by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doubtful. And this is most likely a Flash problem, rather than an Apple problem. It's a mostly closed standard, and even the 'official' implementations aren't all that great.

    Adobe's implementation of Flash is remarkably inefficent, and Adobe notoriously refuse to release the player for any non-x86 platform (apart for legacy support of MacPPC, which is pretty grim even compared to the other, better-supported versions).

    I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for flash on mobile platforms. You'd probably have more success developing your own standard and convincing the world to switch (I'm not kidding).

    The various OSS flash implementations have been progressing at a snail's pace, although I wouldn't put much more hope in those than I would in WINE (ie. it'll never be stable enough to be useful). However, Adobe have recently relaxed their grip on the SWF specification, so we *might* see some progress.

    Still, I wouldn't hold my breath. I don't typically count myself among the flash-haters, but the recent problems arising from the lack of cross-platform support and the absurd levels of CPU usage imposed by the player are a huge problem.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  115. Re:Verizon by tzanger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You're mixing up technologies. CDMA, TDMA, FDMA, OFDMA are all ways of getting the data in and out of the air. CDMA the cellular technology isn't just the air interface. GSM 3G uses W-CDMA as an air interface. That says nothing about which frequency bands, authentication or other interoperability barriers you'll encounter. It's just the way they utilize the bandwidth. LTE is based on OFDMA, which is kind of like CDMA crossed with TDMA and FDMA (your data is not only XORed with a chipping code like CDMA, but you also have timeslots to transmit them in and a number of subcarriers you're allowed to use.) I don't think you'll see a grand unified mobile network anytime soon. :-)

  116. AT&T definition of worldwide coverage by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, it's true that AT&T will have nationwide 3G coverage, for certain definitions of "nationwide" which exclude several entire states, and major portions of the country. Although their map shows presence in every state, this is a mirage. There are quite a few states where AT&T doesn't offer service at all. If you happen to be an AT&T customer from somewhere else, you get 3G coverage from a parter, but you can't get a local phone number on an iPhone (or any other AT&T phone) in those locations.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:AT&T definition of worldwide coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In my area, there is no local ATT coverage. Nearest coverage area is 80 miles away, over the cascade mountains. ATT has flat out stated that their phones will roam fine in my area, but if the majority of my calls come from this area over 3 months, they will disconnect me, and charge me an early termination fee.

    2. Re:AT&T definition of worldwide coverage by torkus · · Score: 1

      Interesting to check and see if that's in their service agreement. If most of your calls are roaming they can 'fire' you as a customer *AND* then charge you an ETF.

      Somehow I doubt they'd get away with terminating the contract on you and then charging you for doing so.

          I love how companies advertize one thing and then do another - al la 'free roaming'

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    3. Re:AT&T definition of worldwide coverage by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      you can't get a local phone number on an iPhone (or any other AT&T phone) in those locations. Who cares about local numbers? My phonebook contains tons of people whose numbers no longer have anything to do with where they live, myself included.
      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  117. Persistent connection? by ilitirit · · Score: 1

    This requires just one persistent connection and is extremely scalable.

    On every phone I've used so far, maintaining an open connection destroys battery life. I wonder how Apple is going to pull this off...

  118. AT&T Wireless Web Site is down for maintenance by wbean · · Score: 1

    AT&T's wireless Web site is down for maintenance.

    http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/site-map

    Interesting!

  119. Trying to find quick feature anwser... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    Trying to find quick feature anwser...

    I'm not an iPhone fanboi by far, but I do friends and clients that like them. (Yes I prefer Windows Mobile because of the massive feature differences, like remoting into my desktop or servers.)

    However, does v2 have Voice recognition and digit dialing? This has been one of the biggest hang ups of people I know, most being bluetooth users and have been clicking their ear piece or stereo headset and saying "Dial Auntie Mame Mobile" or "Dial 555-1212" or other Start Camera and Lookup Contact commands Newer multimedia phones even let you do "Play Madonna" from your stereo headset.(My 80+ grandma uses bluetooth, and wouldn't drag a phone of out her purse just to look at the screen and find a contact to dial by hand anymore.)

    I can't find it mentioned anywhere, if anyone has a heads up or tip on this must have feature, post a link...

  120. Re:EBay is happy! by mihalis · · Score: 1

    The price to own and enjoy an iPhone over the past year hasn't budged, so I don't feel stupid at all. I was kind of expecting there to be a new one by now, but a Summer 2008 phone was no good to me last year... even just the usable mobile maps and email features made it all worthwhile. In case you haven't noticed waiting for better gadgets means doing without them in the meanwhile.

    Chris Morgan

  121. Re:Verizon by cheesybagel · · Score: 3, Informative
    W-CDMA is basically 3G UMTS. It is a 3rd generation GSM replacement. Nearly all UMTS phones support GSM as well.

    W-CDMA, despite name similarities, has nothing to do with CDMA-2000 which is a standard developed by Qualcomm mainly used in the US market.

  122. Re:Verizon by TomatoMan · · Score: 1

    If he's the only one? Very small. If he's one of a big group, potentially a whole lot bigger. What's your point?

    --
    -- http://frobnosticate.com
  123. Not for me by mlewan · · Score: 1
    Reasons I did not buy the previous iPhone:

    * Too big.
    * No disk mode.
    * No possibility to add an external keyboard.

    The new one is much cheaper, but, frankly, why pay anything at all for a device I do not want?

    1. Re:Not for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new one is much cheaper, but, frankly, why pay anything at all for a device I do not want? The answer is astoundingly simple. If you don't want it, don't buy it!
    2. Re:Not for me by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 1

      I just hope you're not breeding.

    3. Re:Not for me by slyborg · · Score: 1

      As an aside, I'm not buying a toy paddlewheel steamer (with working paddlewheel!)

      It's much cheaper than (either) version of iPhone, but frankly, why pay anything at all for a device I do not want?

    4. Re:Not for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are quite the freethinker, you are. Scandalous.

    5. Re:Not for me by mlewan · · Score: 1

      As an aside, I'm not buying a toy paddlewheel steamer (with working paddlewheel!)

      It's much cheaper than (either) version of iPhone, but frankly, why pay anything at all for a device I do not want?

      You got my point exactly! By the way, I just saved $199. Where can I buy that paddlewheel steamer? It sounds real fun.

  124. Re:Verizon by ari_j · · Score: 1

    Where I live, we have two providers: Alltel and Verizon. I'm already pissed off about the buy-out, of course, but of relevance here is the fact that, for me, it's not that I'm unwilling to switch - it's that I'm unable to. The iPhone and OpenMoko are GSM-only for the foreseeable future, and I'm going to be stuck with crappy Verizon software, without even the ability to install Alltel software on my phone the way that all my Verizon friends have done because Alltel will be no more.

    On a side note, I like how Verizon says they'll let you cancel your Alltel contract when they complete the buy-out. Fat lot of good that does me, since they'll at that time have a monopoly on my region.

  125. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verizon isn't the best provider anywhere!

  126. Or maybe not.... by littleghoti · · Score: 1

    With the buzz on some other sites, it is conceivable that the handset will be free, but the contract is where they make the money. European mobile phones are sold in a very different way to the US. We will know soon enough.

  127. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Make that five; one friend, two co-workers, myself, plus the original poster, at the least.

    It's a larger problem than you're implying. The iPhone is wonderful, but why would I want to pay a minimum of $700 per year (minimum) to use it when I have perfectly good service with my current cell phone providor already?

    Jobs just got finished talking about how one of their major targets was reducing the cost, but the cost of switching to AT&T is too great for me, and I would imagine I am not alone in that sentiment.

    And this is to say nothing of the problems I and others may have with AT&T steming from the illegal wiretapping row, poor previous customer-service experience, or service availability limitations!

  128. unmanaged apps? by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

    It looks like their app store model is still very centralized, not at all well suited to installing arbitrary software willy-nilly, as open source DIY-ers are prone to do.

    Of course, if someone makes a good ssh client for it, I'll probably buy one anyway.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  129. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where I live, Verizon is the worst provider. Some people around here imagine that Verizon is the best, but they just fall into the hype. As someone that has used four different providers (due to my various employers giving me different services, etc), I can tell you that, easily, my worst experience was with Verizon.

    I guess it all depends. By the way, I live in one of the top 10 urban areas in the US. And I don't have an iPhone.

  130. Re:Verizon by LarsG · · Score: 2, Informative

    3G network that is based on W-CDMA

    In other words, what the rest of the world calls UMTS?

    --
    If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  131. Re:EBay is happy! by Sancho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It certainly is just preference.

    I've used a Windows Mobile phone for the past 2.5 years. I started tracking my usage of the features. e-mail and web browsing are the two features I use the most. Both are horribly flawed on Windows Mobile.

    Pocket Outlook is great, as long as you're only connecting to Exchange servers. Switch to IMAP, and the server configuration determines the usability, because Pocket Outlook does not support IMAP namespaces properly. The mail server from which I get my mail uses namespaces, and Pocket Outlook locks up when I try to get mail there. I had to do stupid hacks (forwarding mail off, at first, and later using a proxy to re-write requests.)

    Pocket Internet Explorer (PIE) is a different beast. It's crap, even for a mobile browser. Simple pages will render fine, but anything even moderately complex will not work. When I first started using my phone, I just did everything through Google's gateway. That's really not how I want to use the web. Later on, I started using my phone to copy down interesting URLs for perusal at home. The browser on my phone became little more than a portal to IMDB and Wikipedia.

    Opera Mobile is a bit better, but you pay for it, and it's still got rendering issues with some sites.

    What's great about the iPhone, in my opinion, is the support. Even though it has a real web browser, popular websites fall all over themselves trying to put together a version of the site optimized for iPhone's screen. When there isn't an optimized version, you can view the full version (albeit slowly--hopefully 3G will help address that) and zoom specific portions of the page that you want to look at. For me, since what I really want is a data device (I could do without the phone part, honestly), the better the browser and mail client, the better the device. I've tried all the major phone operating systems, and by far, Apple blows them away. RIM does come closest, no doubt, but the web browsing experience just can't compete.

  132. Re:EBay is happy! by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And, if you have an iPhone 1.0, how stupid do feel now? Oh yeah, I feel SOOOO stupid for having used this very good phone for the past 10 months (and will continue to do so for another few years). Meanwhile, I'll be buying a new iPhone for my wife and maybe another for myself, and give my 12-year old son the old one.

    Here's a hint. If you keep holding out for the next-great thing, you'll never have anything to show for your efforts.

  133. Re:Verizon by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    Hate to break it to you buddy, but Verizon is the only provider that can reach a lot of places. For example, practically everyone out in the Wyoming/Idaho area use Verizon because it's the only service with reliable coverage, especially in mountainous areas.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  134. Re:This is also likely to... by Insightfill · · Score: 1

    Should I be pissed at Sony every few months when they upgrade their camcorders?

    One thing that Apple rarely does is promote any model name changes with the aforementioned updates. My coworker has a 1st gen iPod. My kids have the current gen iPods. They're all called "iPod", so there's no easy way to differentiate them, but you can bet my kids are watching h264 video and my friend is not. Ditto for computers, phones, etc. When you try to look up RAM or other component pricing for an Apple product, you have to be very clear about the product description or you'll be steered astray. "What? You have an iMac? Is that the Tangerine model with tray-load CD player at 333MHz? or is that the latest model with everything built into the screen?" No model number, no sub-name, nothing easily differentiates the various animals that are called an 'iMac'. True, cars have been doing this for years, but people are used to including the car year or age to differentiate it.

    My call is that people get most of their "buyer's remorse" from Apple because year after year, Apple keeps releasing a MacBook Pro, an iPod, an iPod Shuffle, an iMac, etc.

  135. Re:How much are the 3G iPhones if I already have A by twotommylong · · Score: 1

    I'll bet $299. Who ever wins get the split the diffence ($100). You can't lose with that bet (the worst you'll pay is $399;-))

  136. Here's the kitty by argent · · Score: 1

    And it's under NDA. So no obvious live feeds.

    Ah, apart from http://www.apple.com/ca/press/2008_06/snow_leopard.html then.

    1. Re:Here's the kitty by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Link dead. And has been so since about 2 minutes after MacRumors posted the link. (Well, at least that long. I didn't even see the link when it was live, so for all I know, the link is a fake, and NEVER worked.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    2. Re:Here's the kitty by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1
      Ah... The /ca link broke, but Apple US finally has it.

      Apple Previews Mac OS X Snow Leopard to Developers.

      Not much info, though. (P.S. that is a press release, not a live feed from the session.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  137. Re:What is the data rate $20 /m $40 /m also 3g cap by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

    With a two-year contract, the price of an 8GB iPhone 3G will be $199; the 16GB model will be priced at $299

    Unlimited iPhone 3G data plans for consumers will be available for $30 a month, in addition to voice plans starting at $39.99 a month

    --
    ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
  138. Re:What is the data rate $20 /m $40 /m also 3g cap by Onan · · Score: 1

    What cap? The current at&t plans are unlimited data, and I don't see any indicator that that will be changing.

  139. Re:Verizon by DiLLeMaN · · Score: 0

    f I am unwilling to purchase an XBox 360 for whatever reason, opting instead for a PS3, is that really my problem? No, if it's anyone's it's Microsoft's. No, actually, they save money by not selling an XBox.
    --
    /var/run/twitter.sock is a twitter socket puppet.
  140. Should have been better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of things here;

    1. It got uglier. It's slightly fatter than the original and the tapered edges make it look even worse! (This is the reason the MacBook Air is so fugly)

    2. No 32GB! I'll pass thanks

  141. What's Missing by SpryGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    From my perspective, these are the things I didn't hear that I had wanted to hear...

    * No expanded capacity. I had hoped for 24Gb or 32Gb models

    * No improved camera. I had hoped for more megapixels, maybe a flash, or at least better controls and options and editing

    * No mention of copy/paste. Come on! Copy/Paste!

    * No mention of rotatable keyboard, across all aps

    * No MMS. Come on! Multi-media messaging is standard on most phones sold now!

    * No mention of email search. Contact search is great, but let us search through everything. Pervasive search!

    That said, I'm still buying one :-)

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  142. Re:How much are the 3G iPhones if I already have A by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    That depends on the state of your current contract with AT&T. If your contract is up, only the cost of a new iPhone and a new plan. If your contract isn't up, there's upgrade costs, fees, etc.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  143. Re:Verizon by Wdomburg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The relative quality of the cellular providers varys wildly depending on location. In my area I would rate AT&T as the absolute bottom of the barrel by a wide margin - dropped calls, people being dropped directly into voice mail despite my phone having signal, ludicrous failure rate on incoming SMS. On the other hand I've had Verizon for about six years now and Sprint for four. No problems with either one.

  144. Snow Leopard by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, not really. What its really about is spreading some of the interesting innovations in Leopard universally throughout the system. For example, the reference to multi core processors in the Snow Leopard press release is clearly about spreading the new NSOperation, among other things. Stuff like that. This goes pretty far beyond a "bug fix" release.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:Snow Leopard by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

      I meant to reply to the post two levels up, and missed. I think it's fascinating that Apple is doing this with Snow Leopard. It's like the polar opposite of Microsoft's track record with .Net, which when push came to shove, Microsoft wanted 3rd parties to use before they used it themselves.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  145. Re:Verizon by wattrlz · · Score: 1

    I dunno, there are some places in New Hampshire I've been where they're literally the only game in town which would, if regrettably, make them the, "best" provider by default.

  146. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  147. The Larger Problem by westbake · · Score: 1

    Spectrum should not be owned. As long as the spectrum is owned by a small number of companies that don't really compete, we will all have to use the crap they allow us to use to connect to their network.

    A half measure would be for regulators to devise reasonable standards for connecting to networks so that any device made could be used. This would give people the ability to guard their privacy but it would not save the economy from tremendous parasitic communications costs.

    --
    I am a name troll of Westlake. Visit my homepage to learn why.
  148. kernel panics by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're really experiencing lots of kernel panics on Leopard, you should check to see if you have a hardware problem. Bad RAM or a flakey disk drive can both cause that problem.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:kernel panics by kabz · · Score: 1

      Yes, bad RAM on a Mini has been the only thing that has made OS X fall over for me.

      All my Macs have been rock solid, though my MacBook is showing some corruption in WoW. Not sure about that.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  149. Re:Verizon by wattrlz · · Score: 1

    What the rest of the world would call, " UMTS v 2.0" if such a thing existed, but yes, ostensibly.

  150. That's a short list... by MacDork · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Allow me to add:
    • The camera still sucks
    • The screen is still glass ($200 repair job)
    • Still no battery door (Which wouldn't bother me all that much if they didn't fall back to "bad battery life" as an excuse for several major failings)
    • Still no multitasking for third party apps
    • Still no copy/paste
    • Still no file manager
    • Still no bluetooth: keyboard driver, a2dp, file transfer, iSync
    • Still raping users with ringtones
    • Still raping developers for 30% of revenue
    • Still forcing app signing on end users/developers

    Frankly, some of the announcements were just lame. Scientific calc? Oh wow, that took what... maybe five minutes in XCode... Why haven't they ported Grapher.app yet? Announcements for VoIP apps were conspicuously missing. So were P2P apps. Gee, I wonder why? </ sarcasm> Yet they can still manage to lob an "ActiveStink" joke... Hmm, maybe people with glass phones shouldn't throw rocks...

    1. Re:That's a short list... by Onan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm pretty indifferent to most of the things that seem to bother you, but one of your complaints stands out as especially backward: the display is "still" glass because it's a vastly better choice. Glass is harder to break, far harder to scratch, and easier to clean than plastic. The only downside is that it's a little heavier, but I find that to be quite worthwhile for never needing to worry about it getting scratched.

      If you're finding yourself breaking a lot of glass iphone displays... well, I can't imagine how you treat your phone, but I'm sure that you'd be breaking plastic ones twice as often.

    2. Re:That's a short list... by Homer1946 · · Score: 1

      Many of the items on this list are a matter of judgement and tradeoffs.

      Many people consider the harder to scratch glass screen a feature, not something that needs "upgrading" to plastic.

      Multitasking is something Apple is intentionally not allowing as it can impact performance and batter life (i.e. they decided that not allowing it would benefit more users than allowing it would help). App signing is a similar decision.

      If you have a Mac with iLife 08 (or are willing to download one of the several ring tone utilities) you can add all the ringtones you want for free.

      Apple is selling a phone and they are making a number of decisions to make it work better for most users at the expense of a few users. You may not agree with the decisions, but all designs involve tradeoffs so you should be able to understand the decisions.

      Of course I would like to have much better Bluetooth, copy/paste etc, but no device has all the features I want (I always want something). All in all I think it is a well done full featured device that I would rather use now than wait another number of months or years for more features to be added.

      Just my opinions of course.

    3. Re:That's a short list... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that they didn't go to multitasking. I don't want to worry about background tasks interfering with my iPhone's core functions or running down the battery. I'm impressed that they've come up with a workaround that achieves many of the same benefits.

      And I'm glad that it is still glass. Plastic is just too scratch-prone. With the glass front I can slip it in my pocket with my wallet, and I don't have to spoil it's small size with the bulk of a case.

      Battery? Well, I suppose I'd appreciate a user-switchable battery, but not if it means a thicker phone or less battery life. As it is, my first generation iPhone still runs over a long weekend without a charge. I've yet to be in a situation where I would have used an extra battery if I had one.

      And I make free ringtones from my mp3's with Apple's GarageBand application.

    4. Re:That's a short list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why was this modded interesting when its clearly an uninformed flame?

      it reminds me of Chevy Chase in "Vacation" when he points out all the cool "Features" his new station wagon has.

      Your list of Negatives could be a list of positives just the same.

      âCamera is perfect for a $200 device
      âGlass is much more solid and less scratchable then plastic
      âafter all the yelling and screaming about battery door, we still have not heard of any "real" issues with the battery.
      â They SPECIFICALLY addressed multitasking (you dumbass)
      âFile manager? what the hell are you using windows explorer for everything in your life? you have iTunes to manage Music, iPhoto for your photos, you can organize your files in folders etc. really you should just stick to WinMo its so much better anyways.
      âwhat the hell? no bluetooth? man I must be imagining all the accessories I can buy everywhere.
      âRingtones? what the hell, you are one of those annoying people who makes music ringtones? figures.
      âRaping developpers? Microsoft is so much better really I mean you just have to pay something like $3500 for their dev kit but who is counting. instead Apple sets up a market place and gets a commission, shish, what where those dumb business execs thinking.
      â wow App signing, you mean like Geniuwine windows certified software?

      dood, are you Rahul Sood or something, do you gingerly slice Cake with your iPhone as well?

      Tired flamer, go back to 1997, and shake hands with Michael Dell, he is doing so great these days.

      PS: check your facts, Zunes, SonyEricsson's, Nokias with all the features you want are available so go buy one of those and leave everyone else alone.

    5. Re:That's a short list... by jsjacob · · Score: 1

      > Still raping developers for 30% of revenue

      How much overhead do you pay (time and labor) for distribution and payment processing, not to mention some advertising on a major site? To me, 30% looks like a fair deal.

      --
      John S. Jacob * jsjacob@iamnota.com * www.iamnota.com * pgp: ac6ace17
    6. Re:That's a short list... by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      As an owner of anforst yen iPhone, I obviously won't agree with the majority of your post. That said, the general dearth of Bluetooth support pisses me off. The phone itself supports a rather rich set of Bluetooth protocol options but Apple doesn't support them client-side. For some forms of syncing (firmware updates and the like) I can understand why they opted out, but allow me to sync my mail, damn it!

    7. Re:That's a short list... by MacDork · · Score: 1

      Multitasking is something Apple is intentionally not allowing.... App signing is a similar decision. .... Of course I would like to have much better Bluetooth, copy/paste etc.

      That's pretty much my main point. You don't have those apps/features because of those decisions. You're left waiting for Apple to implement them, because no one else is allowed. Do you seriously think a graphing calculator would still be unavailable a year later on this device if Apple allowed third party development? Their excuses for locking out developers are ridiculous, and based on the showcase apps in their "big" announcement, it's pretty clear that most serious developers have lost interest in the iPhone.

      It's too bad, they could have revolutionized an industry, but their policies are making them a bit player.

    8. Re:That's a short list... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      With regard to the ringtones, dont blame Apple, blame the screwed up copyright law where you have to pay one set of royalties to get a license to play a song on a portable music player but a totally different set of royalties to play that same song on that same portable music player just because an external stimulus has triggered.

    9. Re:That's a short list... by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      The screen is still glass ($200 repair job)

      Yes, because if the screen is not glass, you just destroyed your LCD, or worse, the things underneath it. That's *totally* less than $200 to repair...

    10. Re:That's a short list... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      "most serious developers have lost interest in the iPhone"

      What are you, on meth AND crack?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    11. Re:That's a short list... by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      I really don't think the "ActiveStink" comment was intentional at all. It sounded very much like a genuine blunder to me.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    12. Re:That's a short list... by MacDork · · Score: 1

      most serious developers have lost interest in the iPhone What are you, on meth AND crack?

      So... what Adobe app will we be seeing on the iPhone? What about Microsoft? Didn't see any showcase apps from them today. You know what I did see? A couple of web apps and a few games. Wow, I can get eBay on my iPhone?? Wicked sweet! :-/

    13. Re:That's a short list... by Homer1946 · · Score: 1

      All we have to do is wait until the App Store is ACTUALLY available and then we will know what is available, both then, and a year later.

      No need to guess.

    14. Re:That's a short list... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      The camera still sucks
      Welcome to camera phones. No matter how many MP you jam on there, you're still relying upon a .5cm lens, which will never gather enough light for clear pictures. Get a camera.

      The screen is still glass ($200 repair job)
      I used to break my Palm Pilot's screens all the time. I've never broken my iPhone. Glass not only has a better tactile feel, it's a hell of a lot stronger and doesn't scratch.

      Still no battery door (Which wouldn't bother me all that much if they didn't fall back to "bad battery life" as an excuse for several major failings)
      Have you ever had to replace your battery?

      Still no multitasking for third party apps
      I waffle on this one, but I like their push-based solution. There isn't much that you really need to do in the background on a communicator, but there is a whole lot that apps can do to slow it down and make it feel like a sewer. See also: any windows installation after about two years of real use.

      Still no copy/paste
      God this drives me nuts.

      Still no file manager
      I've done without a file manager for years now on the Palm Pilot. An intelligent databasing backend should never need a file manager.

      Still no bluetooth: keyboard driver, a2dp, file transfer, iSync
      I'd kill for a keyboard driver.

      Still raping users with ringtones
      It sucks, but which phone manufacturer doesn't do this?

      Still raping developers for 30% of revenue
      You're kidding, right? Do you have any idea of how much of a cut digital distributers like Valve and Microsoft's Live Arcade service take? Let me give you a hint: a hell of a lot more.

      Still forcing app signing on end users/developers
      If the end user needs an app signed, they're in a position to jailbreak.

      Cutting their prices in half
      Oh wait, you didn't say this. How very odd.

    15. Re:That's a short list... by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      Wow, speaking of lame, many of your criticisms were lame. How are developers getting raped by the 30% figure (one central store, publicity/advertising handled by Apple, all credit card fees included, hosting infrastructure handled by Apple)? How are people getting raped with ringtones (it's cheaper than most I've seen)? Why is app signing such a big deal? Why is the glass screen a big deal (did you want a wood screen so it's cheaper to repair? How about not breaking it so you don't need a repair?

      Some of your criticism were valid, but you lost credibility with the ones I mentioned.

    16. Re:That's a short list... by MacDork · · Score: 1

      How are developers getting raped by the 30% figure

      Developers are not given an option. 30% is highway robbery. Credit card fees with my merchant account are between 2% and 3% depending on the card.

      (one central store, publicity/advertising handled by Apple, all credit card fees included, hosting infrastructure handled by Apple)

      Yes, I heard the BS sales pitch the first time. It's still a BS sales pitch. I do not need that as I already have it, and if I didn't it certainly wouldn't cost 30% of my revenue to implement. If they're so confident that it's such a fine deal, why aren't they giving developers a choice?

      Hmm, how can I explain this to someone who is obviously not self-employed... How would you like it if the government decided to raise your income tax by about 30%? Sound good to you??

      How are people getting raped with ringtones (it's cheaper than most I've seen)?

      Aside from the fact that the band never sees a penny? Gee, I don't know... Show of hands, who doesn't like paying for the same song twice?

      Why is app signing such a big deal?

      I'm sorry, I thought this was slashdot. Wow... really? You have to ask??

      How about not breaking it so you don't need a repair?

      No, I think I have a better idea. I'll buy a phone that isn't defective by design.

  151. Re:Verizon by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 1

    I'm with you.
    Verizon's coverage is leaps and bounds above AT&Ts where I am. yet I find myself debating weather to get on AT&T just for rollover and iphone. When I talk to my girl at work our Calls can get dropped like 6 times in two hours. I literally have to turn my head a certain way and if i forget, bang call d/c'd
    While the workphone (verizon cell) has never had one dropped call even when im out in the company car going out on remote ranches. Shame I have to choose between a network or a phone.

    --

    -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
  152. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by randyest · · Score: 1

    I think you misunderstood my comment. I fully understand that $500 is worth more or less to different people. My point was, those who have no problem blowing $500 don't tend to feel the need to justify it to others, they just do it.

    --
    everything in moderation
  153. Price by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    They launch a phone without many features people expect in free phones, and charge $600 a pop. Now companies like Samsung offer up serious competition with the i900, and suddenly Apple is charging $200 a pop.

    Lesson 1: Competition is good.
    Lesson 2: If you paid $600 for an inferior product, you were hosed.

    I'm really curious to see the price point on the i900, which last I heard, will be available in January (a few months earlier than the 3G iPhone).

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Price by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      At 6 million sold, I think the market is rejecting the assumption you have that the product is inferior. It ain't always about features, rather its about if you can easily use the features you do have without a prior knowledge of computer science.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:Price by repetty · · Score: 1

      > Now companies like Samsung offer up serious competition with the i900,
      > and suddenly Apple is charging $200 a pop.

      Unless I misunderstood, Apple isn't selling the iPhone, AT&T is.

      Still, agree with you about competition being good: fortuitous coincidences occur when competition exists.

      --Richard

    3. Re:Price by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Apple manufactures and sells the phone. AT&T sells the service. Alone the same lines, Samsung is going to sell the i900 phone, and Sprint will sell service on that phone.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  154. Re:EBay is happy! by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

    You sound like an adult. Does it sometimes feel lonely being the only adult?

  155. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  156. Re: NOT Slimmaer by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

    My question is: Does the new version support flash? Can it now use the real internet or is it still locked to the Flashless Safari internet? I chuckle every time I read someone saying this. I surf the internet without flash most of the time - it improves surfing no end. I'd be really annoyed if they added it to safari with no option to turn it off.

    Flash really isn't necessary for video if you have a decent browser, which leaves annoying adverts (the worst are these new ones that jump over half the page), annoying all-flash websites (those I am happy to live without), and flash games (meh). The only time I turn it on is for You Tube, and that's only because they don't offer alternative formats. The real internet is getting along just fine without flash, and is (IMHO) moving away from it to more open formats not controlled by one vendor.
  157. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by maxume · · Score: 1

    The op's post didn't read like justification to me. More like insight into the mind of a 1.0 owner who doesn't have bizarre expectations of a technology company.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  158. hardware upgrades by mblase · · Score: 1

    Only hardware upgrades like GPS and 3G won't be. Wondering: would it be possible, technologically speaking, for Apple or Belkin to build an attachment to the iPod dock connector which would add this functionality? It would be a great sale to make, as long as it's considerably cheaper than replacing the iPhone entirely.
    1. Re:hardware upgrades by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      GPS would certainly be doable. 3G, not so much. Then you have the problem of making the official software use it, or roll your own.

  159. Re:EBay is happy! by mblase · · Score: 1

    . I knew when I bought the first iPhone that there would be another version a year or so down the line. It was just common sense. But I didn't want to wait, so I paid a premium. Thats not a big deal for me. Look, that sort of reasonability and objectivity has no place on the Internet. Go back to your academic journals, you hippie.

    If I can get one for $200 with my current plan, though, I'd be really tempted to get the 3G. I don't see why you couldn't. Heck, if Apple wanted to make even more dough they could probably buy back old iPhones for a $50-$100 discount on the upgrade and then re-sell them as refurbished for $150 to new subscribers.
  160. double hah! by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

    This phone isn't being marketed to you! Turns out, not everyone on earth has your life, lifestyle, or priorities!

    Also, I hit my 30s and started a family - and I'm likely to get one. Turns out not even all the people in your rough age and social cohort have the same priorities as you!

  161. Re:Verizon by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    Hate to break it to you buddy, but Verizon doesn't have a network that's compatible with 3G phones. Until Verizon modernizes their network, GSM phones aren't an option no matter who the provider of the phone is or what their restrictions are.

  162. Re:Biggest news is... AT&T increased monthly c by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    Data plans are now $10 more than they are now, so $30/month, with a $39.99/month minimum voice plan... (all in one convenient 24 month contract!) I'm sure that more than makes up for Apple's decrease in price, since they get a cut of that in their profit sharing deal with AT&T. Not dissing Apple or the iPhone, as I was an early adopter of the original, and will probably be an early adopter of this one.

  163. Improved Bluetooth support? by spinctrl · · Score: 1

    There didn't seem to be any info on improved Bluetooth support. Does this one support stereo audio (A2DP) and/or OBEX? What about DUN, so it can be used as a bluetooth modem over HSDPA/3g? The DUN Bt profile is pretty basic.

  164. Coverage varies by location by billstewart · · Score: 1
    All of the major carriers have been upgrading their networks, improving coverage, installing higher-speed technologies as they come out, finding new ways to alienate customers with their billing practices, offering shinier phones, ...


    Here in Silicon Valley, there used to be areas where the higher-priced homeowners didn't want ugly cell towers so coverage was bad; AFAICT, that's mostly no longer a problem with the major carriers, though a few of the hilly areas have spotty coverage, and nobody seems to be charging for roaming any more, so any gaps are pretty transparently covered. It's a big change from five years ago, and especially from 10 years ago. And text messages between people who use different carriers seem to work fairly consistently; it used to be that they might take a day to get delivered if you were unlucky.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  165. iPhone "completely different market" from iTouch? by RustinHWright · · Score: 1
    Gotta disagree with you there. I found it interesting that in the SDK release video from last month, which ran well over an hour, they kept emphasizing the "iPhone/iTouch platform". Looks to me like they're positioning both devices as entrees to a whole new developing device type. Convergence device? Ultra PDA? Whatever; I've heard too many names to care anymore. But one very practical implication of this is that the iTouch gives them a way to sell what is, in effect, an iPhone-platform device to people who don't want to be locked into AT&T but are otherwise their core userbase - high budget, style conscious, UI conscious, mobile lifestyle fans of the glossy and cool.

    We've all read that Apple's relationship with AT&T hasn't gone swimmingly and gawd know plenty of people (me included) REALLY don't want to get cell service from them, if only for privacy reasons. Apple may do plenty of jerky things but they ain't dumb. Or slow. So it's only natural that they've created a routearound. I agree that the markets are *somewhat* different, but far from "completely". Plenty of overlap there, especially from the several year perspective.

    So no, I'll be watching the iTouch and the iPhone as just what they are: devices from the same platform for the same general kinds of customers. No more "completely different" than buyers of BMW versus buyers of Mercedes.

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
  166. Re:EBay is happy! by Homer1946 · · Score: 1

    As as early adopter I thought I might add my 2 cents worth.

    I have enjoyed my iPhone for the last year. Now that the price has been lowered iPhone market share will likely increase faster. That means higher market share for Safari (including mobile) in general, and the iPhone in particular. This means more sites will be optimized for the iPhone (and more sites will support Safari). Therefore Apple releasing a cheaper iPhone in no way hurts me, but can help me.

  167. Re:Verizon by LarsG · · Score: 5, Informative

    EV-DO is a 3G flavor of CDMA, so no luck there.

    As for Verizon "opening up" their network, that's a funny variety of newspeak. It is still more closed than any GSM carrier. Verizon's variety of "open" means that they are publishing specs and setting up a certification lab so that 3rd party manufacturers can make devices compatible with their network. You can't use any old CDMA phone and use it on Verizon, it has to be Verizon certified.

    Compare to GSM, where you can take any unlocked phone, put in a sim-card from any GSM carrier you like and off you go. There is no need for the phone to be $cell_carrier_x certified, it is sufficient that the phone complies with the GSM spec.

    The CDMA family is:
    CDMA (2G) - CDMA2000 (2.5G) - EV-DO (3G) - UMB (4G)

    The GSM family is:
    GSM (2G) - EDGE/GPRS (2.5G) - UMTS (3G) - HSDPA/HSUPA (3.5G) - LTE (4G)

    --
    If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  168. So When Did a Year Become 18-Months? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Seems that I first heard the boast that Apple would sell 10 million iPhones it was going to be the year (12 months) after introduction. Now that has inflated to 10 million in 18 months. Did I miss the memo?

    And how did one button is all anyone ever needs now become button(s)?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:So When Did a Year Become 18-Months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since Steve never said 10 million in a year there wasn't a memo to miss. He said 10 million by the end of 2008. Oh, and the iPhone has always had more then one button. Maybe you should try paying attention from now on.

  169. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  170. Re:Verizon by torkus · · Score: 1

    Yep. It varies hugely. In the NYC area verizon is good, TMO is good, ATT is good, Sprint i hate (well nextel) for various reasons. Each has their own minor dead zones. I'd give verizon a small edge over TMO and ATT i don't use often.

    Out in wisconson visiting some friends however...i had 4-5 bars with TMO no matter where i went. Verizon wireless card? Lucky to get 2 bars, 1 was usually all I got if i had service at all. Ugh...1xRTT = death!

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  171. Android for the win by GBC · · Score: 1

    I am in the market for a new phone and have been awaiting the release of the next iPhone and also the first Android phones. I think, based on this presentation and the earlier demo of Android, I am going to wait for the Android's release later this year. At the very least it won't be anywhere near as shackled as the iPhone. (Just my $0.02 - YMMV)

  172. Apples and oranges. by msauve · · Score: 1

    Forgive the pun.

    A comparison was being made between the iPhone 3G and a "GPS." based on the iPhone having a 33% price premium. I pointed out that it was a 100% premium. Someone said that was for a GPS with no maps. I pointed out that an iPhone doesn't have maps at the stated price, either (you need to pay for service, too).

    So, make a fair comparison, and add the minimum cost of service to the iPhone price, making it $199 plus $70/month times 24 months. Now you can fairly compare to a GPS with a map. $150 for the GPS vs. $1879 for the iPhone. Or, maybe you can find an iPhone 3G somewhere without service, and just use the GPS feature without service and maps. That's the comparison I made - $100 vs. $199.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Apples and oranges. by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      Your price comparison is only fair if you are getting an iPhone in addition to the cellphone you probably already have.

  173. Re: NOT Slimmaer by Tragek · · Score: 1

    Remarkably inefficient; Now that's something that should be said again and again, and four times more if you're on a Mac. I cannot fathom why it takes one full 1.83Ghz core to decode FLV video in flash, when I can do 720p with less CPU usage when it's h264 in QT.

  174. problem with units by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Oh and for our european friends: It's merely â126, Four our british friends: it's merely £100 Thanks for the conversion, but how much is that in Libraries of Congress?
  175. Re:How much are the 3G iPhones if I already have A by jayp00001 · · Score: 1

    you can buy it at the new customer price as an existing customer once your upgrade period comes ( I think it's at 18 mnths).

  176. Re:This is also likely to... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    I do like my xv6700 (mostly because I think it came out before Verizon could figure out how to lock down a phone running windows mobile).

    Based on that, it would be hard for me to leap to an iPhone, but given that it is such a popular platform (which invariable draws eager hackers), I may sell my 6700 and go to AT&T.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  177. $200 subsidy is AT&T's counter unlocking probl by cyclobotomy · · Score: 1

    If AT&T is going to subsidize these by ~$200, and with no advertised non-contract price point, they will likely make you sign a contract at the same time you purchase the phone. This is AT&T's solution to the unlocking problem.

  178. Re:Verizon by Darkforge · · Score: 0

    Hate to break it to you buddy, but Verizon doesn't have a network that's compatible with 3G phones. Until Verizon modernizes their network, GSM phones aren't an option no matter who the provider of the phone is or what their restrictions are.
    Verizon has a CDMA network, not a GSM network; they've had 3G EV-DO for ages now. (I, however, enjoy breaking it to you, because you're not my "buddy.")
    --

    When I moderate, I only use "-1, Overrated". That way, I never get meta-moderated!

  179. Re:EBay is happy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If I own an early iPhone today, I am not a happy camper."

    Translation: My phone is made of bakelite and gutta-percha.

  180. Re:Verizon by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Verizon EVDO service works fine with 3G phones. They just have to be EVDO 3G phones, as opposed to HSDPA 3G phones.

  181. Cool ! by Zeraw08 · · Score: 0

    Now I can download porn with my 3g iPhone from everywhere and 2x faster ! Thanks Apple !

  182. Re:Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and wi by Skuldo · · Score: 1

    I've seen unlocked iPhones for £269/336/$538 in Leeds, UK.

  183. Re:Verizon by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    GSM isn't 3G. AT&T's "3G" service is HSDPA.

  184. No Wireless/Less Space by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Looks like Apple has picked up on the slashdot meme and turned it from a bug into a feature -- look at http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/wireless.html on the bottom right it advertises the phone as having "More wireless. Less space." And given that iTunes is installed, they could have easily added, "LAME."

  185. Re:Verizon by jdray · · Score: 1

    Other than the fact that my wife laundered my phone the other day (it's drying out, working some), I've not had any significant problems with Sprint in 12 years other than billing and customer support. Those aspects are abysmal. At this point, I can't tell what the costs of AT&T's 3G plans for the iPhone are going to be, but I'm sure going to be doing some hard comparison between the 3G iPhone and the "Instinct" that Sprint is coming out with in a couple weeks. Their $100 "everything" plan would be a small price increase over what I'm currently paying for 800 minutes with a few features added on.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
  186. Re:Biggest news is... AT&T increased monthly c by anaesthetica · · Score: 4, Funny

    Data plans are now $10 more than they are now

    I, for one, am tremendously unhappy with this kind of temporal data plan recursion. Even if it is innovative, infinite pricing schemes relying on iterations of the present I find to be unacceptable!

  187. I'm too busy to go to a store by maynard · · Score: 1

    Why won't Apple or AT&T sell me the damn thing online and ship it when one is available? I just don't have time to go to a damn store and wait in some bullshit line in order to buy something that should be available from an online store.

    Hi Apple! Hi AT&T! I'm your target market. Please make it easy for me to buy your product.

    1. Re:I'm too busy to go to a store by Riquez · · Score: 1

      You just spent 20 mins on /. & 7 minutes spell checking your post. After that you spent 15 minutes talking to the guy in the cubicle next to you about the iPhone and another 6 minutes at the coffee machine. It would have taken 45 mins for you to go to the shop & buy the phone, thus saving 3 mins - maybe you could use them to get some work done?

      --
      * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
    2. Re:I'm too busy to go to a store by maynard · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how much you wrongly believe you know about me.

    3. Re:I'm too busy to go to a store by Riquez · · Score: 1

      lol - probably. Still, it was fun imagining it. I imagined some other stuff too, cant post about it though.

      --
      * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
  188. I don't like AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care how awesome the phone is. Until I can pick my carrier, I won't buy one.

  189. Re:Verizon by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

    In your rush to diss Verizon, you conveniently forgot that Sprint with 52 million US customers uses CDMA. Verizon users can switch to Sprint.

    --
    This space for rent.
  190. Re:Verizon by prockcore · · Score: 1

    Verizon doesn't have a network that's compatible with 3G phones. Until Verizon modernizes their network,


    hahaha "modernizes". Verizon's EVDO network is MUCH faster than AT&T's 3G network.

    Engadget did some speed tests on the new 3g iphone.. it's only 200kbps. Barely twice the speed of the EDGE iphone. Verizon's EVDO network, on the other hand, is 3 times as fast as the new "speedy" 3G AT&T network.
  191. Re:Verizon by prockcore · · Score: 1

    actually AT&T's 3G service is UMTS. HSDPA is 3.5G.. and engadget cast some doubts on whether or not the iphone supports HSDPA since they were capping out at 200kbps in their hands-on tests.

  192. Re:Verizon by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    Do Americans write "co-worker" because they can't spell "colleague"?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  193. Re:Verizon by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    In your rush to diss Verizon, you conveniently forgot that Sprint with 52 million US customers uses CDMA. Verizon users can switch to Sprint. Which would also give you a paperweight to lug around if you happen to travel outside of the US. CDMA is a dead end technology. I see Virgin trying to sell there phones in malls here in Canada but there do not seem to be many takers because a lot of people either have a phone and provider or are looking for a GSM phone that they can also use while on their holiday abroad.
    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  194. AT&T says new 2-yr contract REPLACES old one by MojoStan · · Score: 1

    Does Apple allow existing users to upgrade, possibly restarting their 2yr contract, or are they forced to hold to the terms of their previous contract with the old hardware? An AT&T spokesperson has confirmed to Ars Technica (see update at the end) that, for existing iPhone users, the new 2-year contract replaces the previous contract. From the update:
    • "We have received further confirmation from AT&T on these details. AT&T spokesperson Brad Mays told us that the May 27 deal applies to iPhones bought from both Apple Stores and AT&T, and that the new 2-year contract replaces your previous contract. So, if you recently signed a 2-year contract (as I did, in January), you don't have to commit to two more years for a total of four. You only have to sign a brand new 2-year contract. In my case, that would make my total contract time 2 years and 6 months or so."
    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  195. Re: NOT Slimmaer by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    The most embarrassing bit is that, if you extract the .FLV, VLC can play it reasonably efficiently. QuickTime can do it too, given the proper codec (and many mac haters like to think of QT as the poster child of inefficient software!)

    I'm amazed Apple hasn't developed their own specification. If they got their WebKit folks to promote an Open-Source flash alternative, there would be a reasonably good chance of it seeing widespread acceptance. Apple's history with OSS is a bit shaky, although it's clear that any sort of "flash killer" will need the support of the community if it wants any hope of succeeding. The backlash against Microsoft's surprisingly-not-bad Silverlight should be sufficient evidence to convince Apple to go the open-source route.

    Heck.... thanks to the "Core" libraries, the underlying frameworks are already there.

    Flash's days are numbered. That much is for sure.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  196. Actually, non-local numbers can be a hassle... by raehl · · Score: 1

    You may, for example, have friends who are not wealthy enough to have but the most basic phone service. Or maybe you have people who want to call you from their office, where local personal calls are kosher and non-local personal calls are not.

    Not nearly the issue it used to be now that most people have cell phones that don't care about who you are calling, but still an issue.

  197. 3G iPhone Bluetooth headset support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the new 3G iPhone support Bluetooth Stereo headphones?

  198. Keynote Video by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 3, Informative

    The WWDC 2008 Keynote Video is up now. Enjoy.

  199. Re: NOT Slimmaer by Tragek · · Score: 1

    silverlight: On the mac, it's almost as crashy: http://inessential.com/?comments=1&postid=3491

  200. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, comrade.

  201. Is transparent sync the next killer mobile app? by matt_sinclair · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I blogged about the idea of 'transparent synchronisation' today.

    I think it's interesting that the next killer mobile application may not be a mobile application at all, but rather, an application that makes it completely irrelevant and transparent that I am mobile. Regardless of whether I sit down at my desktop at home, my laptop in the airport lounge, or my phone on the go, I get the same, live, consistent view of all of my electronic stuff. This is a hard problem, that's been done quite poorly for the most part. I wonder if Apple has cracked it with Mobile Me?

    M@

    1. Re:Is transparent sync the next killer mobile app? by Maserati · · Score: 1

      > I wonder if Apple has cracked it with Mobile Me?

      If they have, it'll be worth $100 a month. Same bookmarks, same media, similar ability to get stuff done. Email, 20GB web space, multimedia integration AND transparent synchronization for less than $9.00 a month ? It isn't a shell account, but it has its value.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  202. Re:Verizon by Basehart · · Score: 1

    "....people being dropped directly into voice mail despite my phone having signal..."

    While I was reading these words my fully charged iPhone with five bars just told me I had a new voicemail without actually, erm, RINGING so I could take the call.

    Also call waiting thing went away mysteriously at some point.

  203. won't buy it without the modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still no phone as modem capability.

    Wake up and open up Apple.

  204. Re:Verizon by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    Engadget did some speed tests on the new 3g iphone.. it's only 200kbps. Barely twice the speed of the EDGE iphone. Verizon's EVDO network, on the other hand, is 3 times as fast as the new "speedy" 3G AT&T network. That's not an AT&T issue. Either their test was in an area with poor HSDPA support, or it's an iPhone problem. I get 800+kBps from AT&T via my HTC TYTN II--- faster than the 614.4kBps you're seeing.
    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  205. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about windows?

  206. Actually, it's more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plans start at $70/month (before taxes and fees) now. It's $40/month phone + $30/month data.

    The $200 lower price for the phone hardly means much considering you'll spend over $2000 in service over the two year contract.

  207. Re:Price... in Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, price. Nice point here.

    If I am to wait for the Iphone to come to Brazil, I will have to pay something around US$ 850. EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS, yes, thatÂs how much it will cost here. Well... US$ 200 in the US... so i guess IÂm gonna wait for some friend to go to the US and buy one for me. Jailbreaking is not a problem, I couldnÂt care less for AT&T anyway...

    -Andre

  208. Re:Biggest news is... AT&T increased monthly c by Chroniton · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I *knew* I shouldn't have attended WWDC this year.

  209. Same thing by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

    Plug-- Available at the 7/11? They're really breaking new ground with distribution of this one!

    necro81-- Bummer, I was hoping the Kwik-E-Mart would get the exclusive on this one.
    Same thing.
    --
    Notmysig
  210. Bargain bin GPS receiver by DrYak · · Score: 1

    That's valid if you buy a full blown GPS packaged together with- / locked to- some expensive mapping function.

    If you go to the bargain bin you can find very cheap GPS receiver. Which are basically just GPS antennas that communicate using serial cable / SDIO connector / bluetooth link to the device of your choice to be used with the application of your choice.

    No fancy screen nor built-in software.
    For even cheaper, you can find devices (from Parrot, for example) which double as bluetooth car handsfree and bluetooth GPS receivers. (And cost less than both combined).

    Then you can use it with your EEE PC (hum... does google provide an API in Google Maps to use it with a GPS ?)

    Or, if you hate Garmin that much, steal one of their Map application and run it on your PDA, just for the sake of stealing from those you hate.

    On the other hand, given Apple's past stance toward bluetooth, you can pretty much be sure that iPhone 3G's bluetooth could only be paired with handsfree, and would never be allowed to function as a glorified bluetooth GPS receiver for your laptop.

    On the other hand, I don't pretty much give a damn about Apple and thus haven't followed their speach. Maybe in fact Steve has announced that the iPhone 3G is going to be much more open than the iPhone 2G.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  211. BestPhoneEver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get over yourselves people, this is the BEST PHONE EVER MADE. Period. End of Sentence. The rest of you peeps need to shut yo face.

  212. Re:Verizon by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Unless you are in an extreme fringe area, the most common cause of dropped calls is crashing baseband due to firmware bugs---flaws in the phones themselves.... From what I've seen, this usually manifests itself as a sudden drop from five bars of signal to zero, then coming back up a few seconds later. If that's what you are seeing, it's not your carrier. It's your phone.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  213. Re:Awesome new Software Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    get yourself a domain name you cheapskate

  214. Earth to Onan: Glass isn't flexible. It shatters. by MacDork · · Score: 1

    If you're finding yourself breaking a lot of glass iphone displays... well, I can't imagine how you treat your phone, but I'm sure that you'd be breaking plastic ones twice as often.

    I've dropped my phone hard at least once a month for the past 14 months. It set me back about $800 so I try to take good care of it, but sh!t happens, and when it does, plastic bounces. It doesn't shatter like glass. Go ahead, read the comments at the flickr page. They illustrate the point nicely:

    All you iPhone fans are just alike. You brag about how durable your glass phone is until you break it. Then you're crying because of the $200 repair bill... Funny how the 3G iPhone casing is no longer aluminum and now made out of this "inferior" material as well. Perhaps they should have replaced it with glass since glass is SOOO durable.

  215. Re:Verizon by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

    These problems were reported by everyone on my team. AT&T tried swapping us completely new phones. Then a new model of phone. Then a second new model of phone. Then we switched to sprint.

  216. Re:Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and wi by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    And then subsequent updates unbricked the phones.

    Make sure you get in all the pertinent details.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  217. Re:Earth to Onan: Glass isn't flexible. It shatter by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

    perhaps you should stop treating your phone like a horseshoe and more like the expensive electronic gadget that is. If the iPhone had a plastic screen I wouldn't have wanted one. The glass is superior to a scratched up crappy looking piece of plastic

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  218. Re:Verizon by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    It was my impression that AT&T went directly from EDGE to HSDPA without any intermediate step. However, I could easily be wrong about that.

  219. Flash support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have we heard anything on support for Flash files on the iPhones. I would like to view webpages built in Flash, or view flash advertisements... just curious.

  220. Re:EBay is happy! by L7_ · · Score: 1

    A lot of people still have their $100 rebate from their original priced iPhones. Remember the $500/600 price tags on them? See http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/09/steve-jobs-eats.html to job the memory.

    Remember that the credit doesn't count towards itunes purchases, only Apple Store purchases. So I plan on using it towards a 3G phone.

  221. Re:Snow Leopard press release moved by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1
    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  222. Stockholm syndrome? by MacDork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    perhaps you should stop treating your phone like a horseshoe and more like the expensive electronic gadget

    I bought the phone to use it, not to stick on a pedestal behind a velvet rope to admire its beauty. It's a phone. If you use it, you're going to drop it. Fact of life. Plan on it.

    The glass is superior to a scratched up crappy looking piece of plastic

    This really isn't a logical argument. Plastic, scratch resistant screen protectors are about $2 on the high end and they work beautifully. If you did somehow manage to scratch it, just peel it off and stick another one on in its place. I've had the same one for 14 months. There isn't a scratch on my plastic screen.

  223. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colleague is the generic professional subset of co-worker.

  224. If it's "sold separately" by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

    then it is bought/paid separately. Unless you can quote something concrete (I saw that at the bottom of Apple's site too) from Apple it is still dubious what the jailbreaking real price will be.

    You needed to footnote your post.

  225. Re:Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and wi by lmpeters · · Score: 1

    How would you apply the subsequent updates to a bricked iPhone?

  226. the iPhone is not for you ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, I could afford the old $399 iPhone. What I can't afford is over $60 per month for the minimum plan
    If you can't afford the plan, you're not in the target demographic. Yes, I know, it's shiny and all. Get over it.
    1. Re:the iPhone is not for you ... by sjonke · · Score: 1

      Which is my point. Steve said he had successfully made the iPhone "more affordable". I don't think he can make that claim as long as plans cost $60 per month or more. The difference in the cost now is either quite negligible, or, if unlimited data now costs an extra $10 per month as has been claimed on engadget, then he's succeeded in making it LESS affordable, not more affordable.

      --
      --- What?
  227. the iPhone *is* sexy, I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I do friends and clients that like them [iPhones].
    I do friends and clients as well, but not based on their phone preferences. This reminds me of that one guy's sig around here, saying that the real iPhone killer is gonna be sex robots from Japan. He may be on to something.
  228. Standardized on Crackberry... by Shag · · Score: 1

    It's going to come down to TCO. When Jobs first talked about the roadmap earlier this year, one point was that Crackberries require a server in between the phone and the Exchange server, while the iPhone won't. And I think Enterprise has standardized on Exchange a lot more than on Crackberry.

    So it sounds like Enterprise can allow iPhones to trickle in, with direct Exchange access, and if there's a Crackberry server sitting there too, evaluate the cost over time of keeping it around.

    It may very well end up being similar to the way in which Macs have recently infiltrated the Enterprise. A few employees ask if they can please, please, please have one; IT and management eventually say "sure, but you have to provide your own support," and next thing you know, one-third of the organization (or two-thirds, in some cases) have them.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  229. Upgrade by dvs01 · · Score: 1

    Where's the form for sending in my current iPhone for a cheap/free upgrade to the new one?

  230. 1 country, 2 iPhone official suppliers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPhone goes to Latin America and there's something very interesting happening there: the Dominican Republic will have 2 suppliers!
    Claro and Orange

    http://www.apple.com/la/iphone/buy/

    I know the DR is a trendy country (I lived there many years) but why would apple have 2 suppliers there?

  231. Re:EBay is happy! by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    I dunno, re the web. I used to use Opera on my N95... then I just did a firmware upgrade last week, and the internal Nokia browser (based off, I believe, WebKit)... man, leaps and bounds ahead.... intuitive zoom in, zoom out, based on whether you're scrolling, or reading. Worth a new investigation. PIE on an MDA, though? Evil.

  232. Re:Verizon by telbij · · Score: 1

    You act as if Apple didn't factor that into their original agreement with AT&T, and the exclusive deal has no upside for Apple. Given the success of the iPhone it's just really hard for me to see this as a big problem for Apple.

    No doubt the kickbacks from AT&T are sweet, given the market position they were in a couple years ago... Verizon turned down a deal because they didn't believe Apple could make a smartphone... Apple went exclusive because they knew the product would be good enough to make many people switch. All in all it makes perfect business sense.

    Yes, more often than not Apple finds a way to screw the customer, but that doesn't mean they are making a mistake...

  233. Re:Will over seas iphone be unlocked by law and wi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My understanding is that the iPhone underground was quick to blame Apple for the "bricking" but then, as understanding of the firmware was increased, the general consensus was "Yes, the early unlocks did damage the firmware, not just unlock it." Later updates and underground tools were able to undo that damage, so most unauthorized unlocks have not resulted in permanent damage to the phone unless something went terribly wrong in the unlock process.

  234. Re:EBay is happy! by VVrath · · Score: 1

    Here's a hint. If you keep holding out for the next-great thing, you'll never have anything to show for your efforts.

    Except a big pile of cash. Which you can spend on the next-great-thing-that-actually-meets-your-needs when it turns up.

  235. Attack on Google Anroid by mattscape · · Score: 1

    199$? They seem to aggressively push the IPhone into the market. Who else sees this move as a direct attack to Google Anroid?

  236. Re:EBay is happy! by Inda · · Score: 1

    "See, unlike the rest of the world, I haven't had to put up with a shitty cell phone for the past year."

    The rest of the world has had better phones for years. And they've been free with contracts. Yawn.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  237. Re:Verizon by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    You might want to check the parent...

  238. Re:Verizon by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    Yeah. My bad. Mostly was just responding to the condescending jerk above. "Hate to break it to you" is right up there with "Sorry to burst your bubble" in my list of peeves.

  239. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha, typical non-American (probably European) trying to sound intelligent but, as is par for the course, coming across like a complete dumbass. A colleague is someone in your profession that you may or may not work directly with. A co-worker is someone you actually, you know, work with. How does it feel to be owned, moron?

  240. No HSDPA ?! by dapprman · · Score: 1

    That is just so 2005.

    Actually that is the reason I did not buy a Sony Erricson P990 in 2006, instead going for a Vodafone branded TyTn (which I've done well by).

  241. Re:EBay is happy! by stewbacca · · Score: 1
    Whatever man. If you think $200-$500 is a big pile of cash, you probably aren't in the market for an iPhone (or any decent phone, for that matter).

    Funny that you mention meeting my needs, since the iPhone 1.0 does that and more. This is why this whole conversation about "early adopters" feeling stupid is really, well, stupid.

  242. Re: NOT Slimmaer by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    You'd probably have more success developing your own standard and convincing the world to switch (I'm not kidding).

    Microsoft are trying to do something like that with Silverlight. Microsoft would do it, if Apple wanted to play.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  243. Re:Verizon by peragrin · · Score: 1

    half the reason why sprint has that number of users is because they bought nextel, and got the contractors with the push to talk market.

    but sprint doesn't use the same CDMA tech as verizon. their phones aren't interchangeable. yet I can take my GSM phone to europe, buy a local sim card and get a local phone number to use.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  244. Re:Denial aint a river, baby! by ilikeme · · Score: 1

    It seems like the good folk in the crowd agreed with you. While Steve was laughing at how slow the old iPhone was, people in the crowd were CHEERING. Some serious Coolaid in that crowd. I think for effect he should have got out an iPhone 1.0 and smashed it, pointed at a guy in the crowd who had one, and laughed.

  245. Re:Verizon by effigiate · · Score: 1

    Such Apple fanboyism that I say I want an iPhone but can't leave Verizon because ATT is horrible in my area, and I get modded -1 offtopic and labeled "unwilling" to change my provider to a vastly less superior one.

  246. Re:Verizon by DansnBear · · Score: 1

    wouldn't that also make them the worst provider too?

    --

    -= Who are The Headlocks? =-
  247. Re:Verizon by wattrlz · · Score: 1

    wouldn't that also make them the worst provider too?

    Yes, but that's nothing new.

  248. Re:This is also likely to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should I be pissed at Sony It's safe to assume yes.
  249. Re:This is also likely to... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    No model number, no sub-name, nothing easily differentiates the various animals that are called an 'iMac'. True, cars have been doing this for years, but people are used to including the car year or age to differentiate it. That's not entirely true. Most products do have a model number, usually something like M??????LL/A. They aren't advertised as such, though, and even in technical references they aren't always used. A few examples: iMac (Early 2006), MacBook Pro (Late 2007, 2.4/2.2GHz), Xserve (Early 2008), Mac mini (Early 2006).

    The iPods/iPhones don't seem to have model numbers listed on the Apple specs pages, but if you add an iPod to your cart in the Apple store and then view your cart, it shows a model number.
  250. it's not even thinner.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    correct me if i'm wrong but isn't the the iphone 0.48" and the old one is 0.43" ?

  251. Re: NOT Slimmaer by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to chime in and say that any way of watching video that uses up 90% of my processor and freezes when I multitask earns nothing but derision from me.

    I like Adobe, and I do like Flash in some places, but not for video.

  252. Apple is going after a different market by aaandre · · Score: 1

    Apple is going after the mass markets, people who will not spend $500 on a phone. The early adopters, apple geeks, and phone=status luxury users are already in, and now it's time to sell to the big hump on the bell curve.

    And let's remember that with an iPhone comes the necessity to use iTunes, which introduces the users to apple software and makes the transition to Mac computer hardware likely...er. I cheer for our white hard plastic robotic overlords! Oh, and don't tell me that Wall-e is not a plot to prepare the mass consciousness for their arrival!

  253. Re:Verizon by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    Which is also up there with "is always your problem and nobody else's," IMO. Seriously, some people's only real choice is Verizon if they want service that works somewhat consistantly, so it's not their problem and nobody elses...it's basically an entire portion of the nation's problem.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  254. Re:Awesome new Software Company by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

    A domain name for some apps which can start the screensaver and close all your open apps? Come on, ain't worth it. He probably discovered Xcode and was fooling around ;)

    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
  255. Re:Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In that case, sounds like their tower is hosed.

  256. Yes, but... by rdlmorgan · · Score: 1

    Yes, the iPhone is great but will it take down someone trying to hurt you? I don't think so. If you want an apple with a bite, how about a candy apple red cell phone with kick. Check it out at http://www.officialsafetyandsecurity.com/product/SM-CELLred

  257. Re:Verizon by benjj · · Score: 1

    If only they could make everyone not want one! Then they would be close to making a profit!

  258. Re:Verizon by magnamous · · Score: 1

    You seem pretty knowledgeable about cellphone technologies, so I'll ask you my question that went unsolved elsewhere: Apple has a SIM lock on the iPhone that makes it only work with AT&T in the US. Is that SIM lock done in hardware or software? In other words, if for some reason, later down the road, Apple started selling iPhones that were not SIM-locked to AT&T, would they be able to issue a software update that would remove the lock for older iPhones, or would owners of older iPhones have to buy the new, unlocked-out-of-the-box iPhone?

  259. Re:Verizon by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

    There was also a fairly high failure rate on deliveries to their SMS gateway as well. In any case, regardless of the source of their problems it disqualified them as a carrier for us.

  260. Re:Verizon by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    Okay. Fair enough. I apologize for calling you a condescending jerk.