Slashdot Mirror


Gates' Last Day At Microsoft

mrogers writes "Today is Bill Gates' last day as a full-time employee of Microsoft. After 33 years at the company, the one-time richest man in the world will be retiring at 52 to spend more time guiding the charitable Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"

467 comments

  1. Ooh! Oooh! I know! by clang_jangle · · Score: 5, Funny

    What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"



    A shiny, new laptop loaded with Vista, of course. He's earned it!

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly hope you intend to buy him a model with at most 512MB of RAM. That would sweeten the deal considerably.

    2. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not one with OS X? That way he can get some work done at his foundation w/o having to stop and write email to MSFT execs about how badly their software sucks.

    3. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by ninjapiratemonkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But does it run linux??

      --
      01110000 01010111 01101110 00110011 01100100
    4. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Funny

      And a big bottle of scotch to drink - something nice, maybe a highland single malt number, that should ease the pain.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    5. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, get him a 1 gig model, and a cdrom installable copy of Office 2007 or whatever it's called :)

    6. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by rhyder128k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah! Get him a doll from realdoll.com. One modelled on a "typical computer user". Then he can do what comes naturally, and... well basically continue what he's been doing all along to the typical computer user.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    7. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by stretch0611 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"

      Nothing. I have already given him enough money by paying for his OS when I want to run linux.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    8. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A big bottle of oil to drink, of course. He's earned it!

    9. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Azuma+Hazuki · · Score: 1

      Vista, hell. Get him one of the Pangolin-series laptops from system76.com. Fully-loaded with Ubuntu and ready to go :)

      --
      ~Eien no Inori wo Sasagete~ Searching for my Hatsumi...
    10. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      [retirement gift?] A shiny, new laptop loaded with Vista, of course. He's earned it!

      You mean Vista Bob.
             

    11. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by webax · · Score: 1

      What he really wants as a retirement gift: Developers, developers, developers, developers. Developers, developers, developers, developers. Developers, developers, developers, developers. Developers, developers, developers, developers. Developers, developers, developers, developers.... At least that's what he told Steve he wanted.

    12. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And make sure it has a brand spanking new 512MB of RAM for Aero.

      And really, why would I buy him anything? Maybe "How to be a Complete Bastard" by Adrian Edmondson.

    13. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by sgant · · Score: 1

      No, now...FINALLY....he can get a Macbook Pro running OS X and not have to feel guilty about it.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    14. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man should be given a Nobel Peace Prize. Windows has done more to make technology available to non-tech experts than anyone else.

      Remember, the Apple of today isn't the Apple which Microsoft made irrelevant over ten years ago. Well, to be totally fair, Apple did most of the heavy lifting in making themselves irrelevant. Now, they are irrelevant (at least in computing) but extremely profitable.

      Remember: back in those days, IBM, Apple, and Microsoft were all fighting to see who would be the dominant monopoly: there would have been one, no matter which company won out. IMO, it was best for ALL of us that the software company won.

    15. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, idunno, maybe cause it was fucking flamebait?

    16. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was so sure you would load it with Linux before giving it to him. Silly me.

    17. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by nawcom · · Score: 0

      The same people who defend that telepathic zombie Jeebus find anything with sex in it "offensive and immoral." Welcome to the United States.

    18. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Less space than a Nomad...

    19. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      What pain?! He's got enough money to pay someone to use Vista and read e-mails to him.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    20. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I was about to write something negative, but then I thought: since they've given NPP to the likes of Gore and Arafat, perhaps there is a certain sense to the idea.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    21. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The man should be given a Nobel Peace Prize. Windows has done more to make technology available to non-tech experts than anyone else.

      The man should be given a Nobel Peace Prize. Windows has done more to make money for techies due to the unnecessary complexities imposed on non-tech experts than anyone else.

      There. I corrected it for you. No you dolt. Press control X. Everyone knows that. Pay up.

    22. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by bloodninja · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The man should be given a Nobel Peace Prize. Windows has done more to make technology available to non-tech experts than anyone else.


      The man should be given a Nobel Peace Prize. Windows has done more to make money for techies due to the unnecessary complexities imposed on non-tech experts than anyone else.


      There. I corrected it for you. No you dolt. Press control X. Everyone knows that. Pay up.

      I credit Windows for bringing the price of consumer hardware down, especially Vista. Just think, if Vista were not so HW-heavy would we have today Dual- and Quad- core processors and _Gigabytes_ of RAM for so cheap? People who use an OS that does not need all that (Ubuntu, for instance) can literally have a system that is four times as powerful as they need, for the same adjusted cost of what a regular system would have cost only three years ago.

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    23. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      It's kind of like the Muslim faith, when you die a martyr you go to heaven and get your 72 virgins. Except in this case he gets 72 Microsoft developers (Who are of course, virgins.)

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    24. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 insightful? Sorry, but you're an idiot if you payed for Windows when you wanted to run Linux - or perhaps you only buy Dell computers?

    25. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As a stock owner I'd also like to say thanks. :)

    26. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by leamanc · · Score: 1

      A shiny, new laptop loaded with Vista, of course. He's earned it!

      And a couple of accessories to go with it: A dongle that will allow him to install Mac OS X on said laptop, and an Ubuntu CD if he would rather go that route.

      Don't think he wouldn't choose one of those options, because even he knows that Windows, in its current state, is unusable.

      Bill sure did pick a good time to get out. I imagine when Windows 7 receives its inevitable bashing in the press, he'll be content just giving his money away, saving the world, one gift from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation at a time.

      --
      :q!
    27. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by crunch_ca · · Score: 0

      ...with Vista...

      I'd put Gentoo on it, so it's more usable and easier to update.

    28. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 1

      Nah - 640Mb should be enough for anybody... :-)

      --
      But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    29. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not buy him anything. Wtf do you get the man that has everything.

      something symbolic ingraved with the number of patents that linux secretly violates .. and perhaps advice on directing the bill foundation.. no wait.. he's doing quite allright on that alone isnt he.

      My verdict on gates and microsoft as pure evil is on hold for now.

    30. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by dwye · · Score: 1

      Bill sure did pick a good time to get out. I imagine when Windows 7 receives its inevitable bashing in the press, he'll be content just giving his money away, saving the world, one gift from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation at a time.

      What money? Most of his net worth is tied up in the (unrealized) value of the Microsoft stock that he owns. Therefore, if he dumps it or it tanks, he still ends up a mere multimillionaire :-) Hell, if Microsoft actually went belly up, he probably be worth just a few million from his house, cars, and movable chattel, and his father would have to include him and his daughter in the will, again.

      Therefore, if Steve Ballmer really does drive the company into the ground, expect him back like Michael Corleone (or more realistically, like Steve Jobs back into Apple). If he doesn't, his Foundation will be broke, not to mention Melinda and daughter.

    31. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"

      A shiny, new laptop loaded with Vista, of course. He's earned it!

      I'd have suggested a MacBook Pro or a notebook running Ubuntu

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    32. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given his relationship with Ballmer, a sock.

    33. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"

      A shiny, new laptop loaded with Vista, of course. He's earned it!

      A Mac, something that works.

    34. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by texaport · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ten years ago I bought some shares of Microsoft stock shortly after the release of Windows 98 -- I'd buy him a gift with every penny he earned me as a shareholder since that day.
      If you had just bought 36200 shares of MSFT stock back then for $999,844 plus a $362 commission, it would now be worth ONE MILLION DOLLARS today.

    35. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Jax7 · · Score: 1

      i would buy him an Ipod Touch, PS3 and a Laptop pre-installed with Linux and LinuxMCE :). He might have got frustrated using M$ products all these years!

    36. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, that's no good for Bill. Having to re-compile the kernel every time you want an email attachment to turn your machine into a zombie isn't exactly a user-friendly experience, is it? This capability should be built in.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    37. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      72 raisins, actually. Unlike 72 Microsoft developers, who are of course... oh, hang on...

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    38. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slightly off topic- and more questions than answers, but what route would processor design have taken were MS and Intel not so dominant?
      Would we have seen the Alpha processor take off or the ARM?
      How many years of research have been wasted because of this dominance and to what degree has it held the industry back?

    39. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by houghi · · Score: 1

      I'd buy him a gift with every penny he earned me as a shareholder since that day.

      So basicaly you are willing to part with all the profit you made. Worse, you are willing to have the same amount of money, which is less due to inflation. Why?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    40. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    41. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"

      A shiny, new laptop loaded with Vista, of course. He's earned it!

      A nice Shiny Turd --- Oh sorry you already suggested that :-P

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    42. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Yahoo!?

    43. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by I+Want+to+be+Anonymo · · Score: 1

      Why would he need that?

      He could have written it himself.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards get no respect.
    44. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have a nice gift for him.

      I would give him a proverb. This one:

      Steal a sheep, give wool at mass.

    45. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      An iPhone, an iPod, and a MacBook - no...just kidding, those are far too high-quality for that dood, instead, I would give him serious books on Henry George, Thorstein Veblen, Michael Hudson, Catherine Austin Fitts' writings, along with Carolyn Baker's history publications.

      For anyone reading nonsensical tripe such as The Economist over the past 33 years deserves to unplug from the Matrix.....

    46. Re:Ooh! Oooh! I know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A copy of the Bible, Quran, Torah or Testament (or whatever else is relevant). He's got a long way to attain atonement.

  2. Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by xmas2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... that runs Windows ...

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by bpfinn · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, a gold one of these?

    2. Re:Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by Daimanta · · Score: 0, Troll

      "... that runs Windows ..." ... ME. Enjoy your watch, Bill!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    3. Re:Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by XenoPhage · · Score: 5, Funny

      "... that runs Windows ..." ... ME. Enjoy your watch, Bill!

      Upgrade the pain! Make it run Vista... All the gore of WinME with the added pain of UAC!

      "You are trying to check the time, Allow or Deny?"

      Of course, you'd need to upgrade the graphics card and memory in the watch. Oh, let's not forget more storage space. And it'll probably need a faster processor. ... Maybe a sundial is easier...

      --
      XenoPhage
      Technological Musings
    4. Re:Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Make it run Vista with Microsoft BOB as the desktop interface!! Ouch!!

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    5. Re:Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by nawcom · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they will at least update Bob. Though it will probably only work with DirectX 10 video cards.

    6. Re:Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more like a hand grenade that ran on ME. Even looking at it might set it off...

    7. Re:Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget you need OEM editions of Vista Business or Vista Ultimate to downgrade to sundial

    8. Re:Obligatory: A Gold Watch ... by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that's a baboon. And it's only the lowest area of the back that's blue.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  3. A Mac by Dolohov · · Score: 5, Funny

    (I mean, judging from Microsoft's product lines for the last twenty years, it's what he really wants...)

    1. Re:A Mac by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it's not a Mac he wants--it's Apple.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re:A Mac by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      After all these people suggesting a mac, I think Steve Jobs should buy him an Apple store. I don't care how nifty macs are, there are very limited uses for this many :P

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    3. Re:A Mac by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 1

      Microsoft already owns 10% of Apple. They bailed Apple out when they were in trouble, just so that they could have a visible 'competitor' in the Market.

      --
      Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    4. Re:A Mac by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Microsoft already owns 10% of Apple.

      Sort of. That buy was of a special, non-voting stock set up just for the occasion. So while Microsoft may own some Apple stock, they have no say in the governance of the company.

      I'm not absolutely sure of this but I believe that MS already sold that stock in any case. Made a tidy little profit on it, too.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
  4. Retirement Gift by ilovegeorgebush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Blatantly a tux toy.

    For all my *NIX & FOSS zealotry, I can't help but respect what he's brought to the world. His & MS's achievements have been broad and they've paved the way for multiple industries. Maybe I wouldn't be writing this on a Linux box if it wasn't for Windows :)

    1. Re:Retirement Gift by The+Warlock · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your Linux box's GUI might look different but I doubt much else would change: Linux was inspired by Minix, GNU, and UNIX, not anything from Microsoft.

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    2. Re:Retirement Gift by Hatta · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What has Bill Gates personally achieved? Note that personally ripping off the ideas of others is not an achievement.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Retirement Gift by Saedrael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      MS products provided the competition that Linux needed to advance.

    4. Re:Retirement Gift by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well lets see... Not much technologically but...

      Managed to fool Altair to pay them for a non-existent software at that time. Managed to buy DOS and sell it to IBM, managed to get out of an anti-trust lawsuit, managed to recover from disasters such as MS Bob, ME, etc. Basically, Gates couldn't compete with code, so he competed with a business.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:Retirement Gift by jimicus · · Score: 4, Informative

      What has Bill Gates personally achieved? Note that personally ripping off the ideas of others is not an achievement.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/15/could_bill_gates_write_code/

    6. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amassing an enormous fortune?

    7. Re:Retirement Gift by rishistar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Linux also benefited greatly from the fact that MS became de facto on the cloned PC market. All the other major vendors an the time had an apple like hardware and OS that were sold together. As IBM never got an exclusivity deal on MS-DOS, clones could run it, and thanks to this 'standardisation' the price dropped on the hardware thanks to the benefits of competition on the same hardware. Without that low cost of hardware Linux would not have taken off, and its extremely unlikely that as many people would have computers, internet access and slashdot accounts with which to slag off Microsoft.

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    8. Re:Retirement Gift by Mr_eX9 · · Score: 1

      I believe he was referring to the fact that it was none other than Microsoft that pushed PCs into people's homes in the first place. No PC = no machine to post on Slashdot with (Linux or otherwise)

    9. Re:Retirement Gift by Keyslapper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yah, right.

      In the form of backlash, maybe. If you do something poorly in this industry and try to rape your customers for the privilege, there are a thousand nerds out there that will find a way to do it better for less (or free).

      The real contribution is in that constant teasing of "You can do this" (as soon as our product stops sucking ...). At least initially.

      Eventually, when there was enough of a "footprint" of computers in common culture, it was guaranteed to get out of MS control.

      The thing about Gates is he's more a business nerd than a software nerd - at least that's what he's better at. Sure, he probably got his fingers into the OS after he bought the original version of DOS, but trying to put computers on every business desk, and eventually every home rather than just focusing on the back rooms of banks and big businesses is what got everyday folks looking for the potential in these things.

      The truth of the matter is that none of us real software nerds (flattering myself again) would ever have thought of writing a program that lets you track your finances, write documents and typeset them, create elaborate presentations, etc.. Sure, we'd have come up with some neat games, but without computers in every home, there would be a lot less creative pressure on that industry, and it wouldn't be quite so big as it currently is.

      We'd probably just be breaking out of our fringe culture status, and a good number of us would have chosen far different paths for our professions.

      Or am I giving him too much credit? Probably - Gods, I sound like a Gates fanboy - (as I write this on my Mac, developing on Linux. Gah!). He was really only out to make a buck and take over the world after all.

    10. Re:Retirement Gift by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that no one else would have come along and done the exact same thing. Bill Gates just happened to be at the right place at the right time and knew the right people. Hell, it might even be better if Gates wasn't around because then proprietary software might not be so popular...

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    11. Re:Retirement Gift by clem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And cheap commodity hardware. Ushering in the age of the desktop assured that.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    12. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows key... bottom left, next to "Alt" ?

    13. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It always amazes me when people talk about what would had happened if Bill Gates had not done MSDOS for the IBM PC.

      You think that propietary software might not be so popular?

      Well, let me tell you that the other *realistic* possiblity (from what really happened in history) about bringing Personal Computing to the masses was related to fruit.

      If Microsoft had not succeeded the way they did, you all will be ranting about this big monopoly called Apple and their completely and utterly closed OS platform.

      Do you realize that Apple is more closed-minded than Microsoft? And Steve Jobs is more of an asshole than Gates?

      Bill Gates is just a Geek, and I have always thought that it is so good that someone like Gates got to have all that money, because if you compare it to say, Carlos Slim, Bill is a saint. Slim is a rich bastard that "does not like going like Santa Claus".

    14. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have you personally achieved?

    15. Re:Retirement Gift by stretch0611 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...MS's achievements have been broad and they've paved the way for multiple industries. Maybe I wouldn't be writing this on a Linux box if it wasn't for Windows :)

      I do not agree with that assumption. First off, Unix was not created because of MS and/or Windows and Linux was created as a Unix clone, not specifically to compete with windows. If the pc hardware was not around it would have been built on different hardware.

      Next, even without MS, IBM would have still been looking for an OS for its new computing platform. Because it was IBM, which at the time was the de facto standard/monopoly, there still would have been a clone market even without MS's help. If the clone market did not provide enough cheap hardware, there would have been cheap hardware from either the computers running CP/M or even the home market (Amiga and/or older 8bits computers)

      Linux evolved from someone's desire to clone minix, not from a need to use something other than windows.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    16. Re:Retirement Gift by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 3, Informative

      none of us real software nerds (flattering myself again) would ever have thought of writing a program that lets you track your finances, write documents and typeset them

      I think you need a couple of history lessons.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    17. Re:Retirement Gift by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Considering the vast majority of jokes on Slashdot are running memes:
      (examples: "1??? 2??? 3 PROFIT", "Natalie Portman/Hot Grits", "In Soviet Russia... YOU"

      All I can say is:
      "You must be new here."

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    18. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed Ubuntu and I think I've almost got wireless working.

      That makes me a better nerd than Bill Gates, right?

    19. Re:Retirement Gift by snoyberg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Without that low cost of hardware Linux would not have taken off, and its extremely unlikely that as many people would have computers, internet access and slashdot accounts with which to slag off Microsoft.

      So I would have had a 4-digit UID? Damn it Bill Gates!

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    20. Re:Retirement Gift by Locutus · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that hardware vendors don't know how to compete on price and therefore it was the operating system which lowered hardware costs? Do you think that CPM-86 was not going to run on cloned IBM compatible computers?

      Sorry but you're just dictating history, not giving any credit for something which Microsoft actually did. They rode the position IBM gave them and used that position to block company after company from growing in that market. And Microsoft still limits growth in the industry be blocking Linux with leveraged threats to anyone who wants to play in a mixed market( Windows and Linux ). ie, any existing Windows OEMs get 'talked to' constantly about what it means to Microsoft if they start pushing Linux and/or open source software.

      Way to go Bill, and from those who don't worship the ground you walk on, good riddens.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    21. Re:Retirement Gift by wtfispcloadletter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Without MS DOS and later Windows, the computer world of today would look very, very different. I seriously doubt we'd have advanced anywhere close to where we are today without Microsoft. Though we might have gone even further, who knows.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not an MS fan boy. But I have serious doubts that Linux would have ever been if Microsoft wasn't around. Would Linus have had the same exposure to computers? He might not have ever gotten that IBM PC, MINIX might have never been developed, hell the IBM PC might not have ever taken off.

      Without Microsoft we might just be seeing the start of the personal computer right now, or Apple with the MAC might have taken over. Without Microsoft, it would be a completely different landscape and nobody can know what it would have turned out like.

    22. Re:Retirement Gift by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft had not succeeded the way they did, you all will be ranting about this big monopoly called Apple and their completely and utterly closed OS platform.

      Ya, and like I said, done the exact same thing. I don't think Apple would have struck a deal like that with IBM (which is supposed to be a very different corporate environment). You assume it would be a closed OS platform, but atleast it would also then probably be UNIX. I was simply stating, with no Gates, it is more of a possibility that proprietary software wouldn't be as popular. The fact is, Gates was very vocal about his dislike for non-proprietary software and that had a big impact on it when MS became so big. Not only that, but if there were no MS and only Apple, do you really think that there would be no other competitor? Wow, no kidding we would be ranting about the Apple monopoly...

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    23. Re:Retirement Gift by nawcom · · Score: 0

      I do have to also support this point by saying that the X11 project (your "Linux GUI") is no way even like Windows at all. X Window System is an open source windowing system thats run as a server and is run on any BSD, Linux, Solaris, Darwin (OS X), Ultrix, HPUX, uggh the list goes on. If you want to link Microsoft to "X-dependent software" I would point at GNOME and KDE. (mainly the start menu and taskbar design).

      Sorry if I seem harsh by pointing this out, but so many people think GNOME or any popular window manager or desktop environment is a feature of Linux.

    24. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the things that strikes me, after reading your linked article, is the fact that not only could Bill Gates write "uber" code, back in the day, but that, in one form or another, EVERYONE that denigrates him does so from computers that exist because of what he and his company (among others) did so long ago.

      So, for those of you that make "640K should be enough for anyone", and similar jokes, and for all of the Microsoft bashing that goes on here, I pose this question to you: How many of you have written even a BASIC interpretoe? Or have the knowledge and skill to do so? The desire to, and the drive necessary to learn how?

      Or even know how to write code, in general? Have contributed, in ANY way, to improving computing, by dint of your effort? Made things better, because you could, and wanted to?

      So many of you here are only online at all because of the efforts of others with skills, knowledge and talent that you only benefit from, and can neither duplicate, nor improve upon.

      You criticize with the benefit of hindsight, accepting that which you have been given and use daily as familiar, because it is to you - created so by others.

      Familiarity breeds contempt, it is said, and nowhere is that proven more true than here on Slashdot in the 21st century.

      In short, you're users. You're not true nerds, driven to learn, to take what you learn, and create new things from that, and know the joy that results from it.

      You use the things that others create, without true understanding, and with contempt, and whine when you are denied.

      I pity you, I honestly do: While you flock together here on Slashdot, ostensibly because you are nerds, you're not.

      But, my God, there are so MANY of you here now. It's a good thing for Slashdot, from a revenue perspective, I suppose. And it's probably why the editors tailor the articles towards you users - it's easy money for them, after all.

    25. Re:Retirement Gift by bloodninja · · Score: 1

      Your Linux box's GUI might look different but I doubt much else would change: Linux was inspired by Minix, GNU, and UNIX, not anything from Microsoft.

      His hardware would be a lot shittier. Windows, and especially Vista, have really brought the price of hardware down. I still cannot believe that a 2 gHz, dual core processor and 2GB of RAM are considered entry level today. And that's available relatively cheap, too.

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    26. Re:Retirement Gift by notaprguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This gets modded as interesting? Jeesh. I'll give is a try. What did he achieve? Well, most important, he was the one who had the vision of a computer on every desktop and who recognizead that software was the key, not hardware. It sounds obvious today but when Microsoft started, computers were for big companies or a small number of hobbyists. Gates and Allen realized that the microprocessor would eventualy make computing available to everyone and realized that software was what mattered. They didn't rip anyone off. That's a myth. They were smart enough to sell IBM a version of DOS that they purchased and modified with a non-exclusive license. They realized that having a standard platform on commodity hardware would lead to a huge amount of innovation. Before then, "personal computing" was a bunch of little islands...random UNIX's, MacOS etc...none of which worked with each other. All proprietary. Windows in that sense was very open. Microsoft made it easy for millions of developers to build any type of software or hardware that worked on Windows and spurred a wave of innovation. Did they make money doing so? Yes. So what? Go ahead, trout out the old nonsense about them achieving everything by stealing or cheating. When I hear that it reminds me of Rush Limbaugh... He has the evil ability to take a truth, turn it completely around and still call it truth.

    27. Re:Retirement Gift by waldo2020 · · Score: 1

      not on any of MY keyboards!

    28. Re:Retirement Gift by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      Just to expand on your point and counter those that must not have been around at the time:
      As a person that was involved with home computers prior to IBM introducing the PC, the exponential growth was already happening. I started programming computers about 4 years before the PC was introduced, by the time it came around I remember discussing with my friends how rapidly people around us were getting into it, learning to program, new magazines popping up, etc.

      The freight train was already starting to move by the time IBM introduced the PC, but IBM kicked it into gear and Compaq really got things cruising once they created the first clone. There was a void in the market that was going to get filled regardless of whether Bill Gates/MS or any other single individual or company existed.

    29. Re:Retirement Gift by strabes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the GUI would be 10 times better because it wouldn't use that awful windows launcher/taskbar/system tray model. Don't get me wrong: I love linux. I just hate the whole launcher/taskbar/system tray thing.

      --
      Its = possessive. It's = "it is"
    30. Re:Retirement Gift by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Didn't the release of Windows, especially Windows 95, induce a huge increase of demand in IBM compatibles?
      That at least is my impression, and it's kind of supported by a lazy google search. So, CPM-86 doesn't have all that much to do with the growth of the industry and the abundance of cheap hardware it caused.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    31. Re:Retirement Gift by wizzat · · Score: 1

      > So, for those of you that make "640K should be enough for anyone", and similar jokes, and for all of the Microsoft bashing that goes on here, I pose this question to you: How many of you have written even a BASIC interpretoe? Or have the knowledge and skill to do so? The desire to, and the drive necessary to learn how?

      I have.

      > Or even know how to write code, in general? Have contributed, in ANY way, to improving computing, by dint of your effort? Made things better, because you could, and wanted to?

      I have.

      Remember: "When we judge or criticize another person, it says nothing about that person; it merely says something about our own need to be critical."

    32. Re:Retirement Gift by neumayr · · Score: 1

      I do not agree with that assumption. First off, Unix was not created because of MS and/or Windows and Linux was created as a Unix clone, not specifically to compete with windows.

      Yes, it was. But do you think so many people would have taking on the task of improving Linux if they hadn't been annoyed by Windows and its omnipresence?
      There probably wouldn't be so many people capable of OS development if it weren't for the abundance of cheap hardware to learn on - which brings me to your next point:

      If the pc hardware was not around it would have been built on different hardware.

      Next, even without MS, IBM would have still been looking for an OS for its new computing platform. Because it was IBM, which at the time was the de facto standard/monopoly, there still would have been a clone market even without MS's help.

      IBM didn't intend to go after the home computing market - Microsoft did. You can't tell if another OS vendor would have had the same foresight MS did. Because of MS' success in popularizing computers outside the fringe crowd of Amiga/Atari/$whatever hobbyists and businesses (not with DOS, but with Windows), people have begun to clone IBM's hardware and thus, through competition, driven prices down.

      Of course, you can continue this what-if game forever, but the way things happened, there's no denying it was Microsoft that made this industry what it is, and that the state of the industry encouraged Linux development immensely.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    33. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He founded and grew Microsoft from a small group of friends to one of the largest companies in the world.
      He brought computers to the masses.
      He has donated billions to charitable causes.
      He was named one of the most influential people by Time magazine numerous times.
      He has been featured as one of Time magazine's people of the year.
      He was the richest man in the world for 12 years or so.
      He was made an honorary Knight Commander of the British Empire.
      He was awarded the Order of the Aztec Eagle.
      He has been happily married for over 14 years and has 3 children.
      He is incredibly smart.

      And in the end, he really doesn't seem like a showy or arrogant person. I think that might say a lot more about what he has accomplished than anything else.

      Now, what have you personally achieved?

    34. Re:Retirement Gift by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      How is this flamebait? Gates' work - the totality of it, which is something you cannot measure exclusively in KLOCs, helped to bring about the commodity PC. Gates' helped to bring about a standard for personal computing. We can joke about how it was a low standard, but so what?

      IBM deserves credit too, but less. IBM didn't evangelize the PC platform the way Microsoft did. We can argue hypotheticals all we want, and say that it was a stroke of luck, or that IBM would have just bought an OS from someone else had Microsoft not been there; but the fact is, Microsoft was there. I have my problems with Microsoft and Gates, but the guy deserves recognition that he's actually achieved something positive.

    35. Re:Retirement Gift by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      Never coded a basic interpreter, but coded a brainfuck interpreter, and if it's harder to write, it must be harder to interpret.

      Also a basic interpreter doesn't seem that hard from what I've seen, though I don't claim to know very much about BASIC or coding in general.

      As for contributing to computing, I've added a couple of features (Hint function, display the number of possible moves, allow a game without time limit, end the game when no more moves can be made) to the KDE game KDiamond, those features should be in KDE4.2, neither impressive nor useful to anyone except those who want to play a desktop game, but you asked who could code.

    36. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what *might* have happened? History is already written and Microsoft was responsible for making computers popular, nobody else.

      The first PC I ever had was a Kaypro 8086 running MS-DOS v2.1. Microsoft certainly was the reason I got into computers and for that they have my respect.

    37. Re:Retirement Gift by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One of the things that strikes me, after reading your linked article, is the fact that not only could Bill Gates write "uber" code, back in the day, but that, in one form or another, EVERYONE that denigrates him does so from computers that exist because of what he and his company (among others) did so long ago.

      Actually, at that time, many people were doing things like this. I am not sure whether writing BASIC in the first place can be considered "uber-code". How does this compare to, e.g., the work of Chuck Moore of the Forth fame? Now that is a man who would deserve some credit for pushing the state of the art. Take a look at what he did at NRAO with just one PDP-11 - I believe the DEC people themselves would not push such a system *that* far.

      Or what about microFORTH? A FORTH system written in FORTH (not in assembly language), capable of "metacompiling" itself (in the FORTH parlance) for several CPU architectures - CDP-1802, 8080, 6800, Z80 - with interactivity, multiprogramming, and you could even have a simple form of virtual memory when you felt that it was necessary. And with just a 1K basic nucleus. How exactly does that compare to a primitive dialect of BASIC?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    38. Re:Retirement Gift by ponraul · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded troll?

      It is entirely plausible that computing in general could look very different were different business decisions made. If IBM got to the PC market a few years earlier and was able to design their whole architecture in-house, it is doubtful that the industry would have moved as fast as it did in the 1980s; they would have likely come to market with a miniaturized and crippled version of a System/370.

    39. Re:Retirement Gift by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "What has Bill Gates personally achieved?"

      He got you to post a comment about him. :o

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    40. Re:Retirement Gift by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      Without that low cost of hardware Linux would not have taken off, and its extremely unlikely that as many people would have computers, internet access and slashdot accounts with which to slag off Microsoft.

      Perhaps Linux wouldn't have gotten off the ground, but wouldn't a greater diversity of hardware have made Open Source much more desirable? Being able to compile for many different options is one of the things that makes it so useful. As for an OS if Linux wasn't around, the lack of an existing GPL kernel might have been what was needed to motivate other developers to get behind GNU Hurd.

    41. Re:Retirement Gift by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      I think implicit in the OP's statement was "and usable without post-grad compsci work."

    42. Re:Retirement Gift by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Windows 95? it was all but over by late 1995 when Windows 95 shipped. I guess you somehow missed the 80s and early 90s.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    43. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's right, home computing use shot way up in the late 1990s, although AOL and Netscape probably deserve as much credit as Microsoft.

      Maybe it was over for you in the 80s, but the common man didn't get a computer until about 10 years ago.

    44. Re:Retirement Gift by reiisi · · Score: 1

      He founded and grew Microsoft from a small group of friends to one of the largest companies in the world.

      And?

      He brought computers to the masses.

      I tend to thing rather that he has been doing his best to keep real computers out of the hands of the masses.
      But, I admit, I may have a different definition of "real computer" than you. I tend to think of a thermostat as a real computer. It's a tool, not a mechanic circus act trainer.

      He has donated billions to charitable causes.

      Billions that some people say he never should have had.

      He was named one of the most influential people by Time magazine numerous times.

      And?

      He has been featured as one of Time magazine's people of the year.

      You like to repeat yourself. Is Time your scripture?

      He was the richest man in the world for 12 years or so.

      And?

      He was made an honorary Knight Commander of the British Empire.

      Some Americans would have politely refuse on principle.
      At least, that should keep him from running for president, shouldn't it?

      He was awarded the Order of the Aztec Eagle.

      And?

      He has been happily married for over 14 years and has 3 children.

      Hmm. I have been (relatively) happily married for over 15 years, but I only have two children.
      Okay, that's an accomplishment. Let's give both of us an award for it.

      He is incredibly smart.

      Well, as my wife sometimes says, there are a lot of dumb geniuses out there.
      I mean, maybe he is smart. But what does that mean? Should it mean he should have been smart enough to (1) not foist the horrors of MSWindows on the world? and (2) not attempt to keep that cancerous monopoly?

      And in the end, he really doesn't seem like a showy or arrogant person. I think that might say a lot more about what he has accomplished than anything else.

      Showy?
      Matter of opinion, I won't argue.
      Ostentatious?
      What kind of house does he live in?
      Arrogant? ... erm ...

      Now, what have you personally achieved?

      Well, he re-implemented BASIC in 4K on an early ALTAIR. He made a lot of money.
      I re-implement fig-FORTH on a late 6809. I didn't make a lot of money.

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    45. Re:Retirement Gift by rishistar · · Score: 1

      Could have been true, but the 80s was a very different ball game to now. Remember we are looking at the reasons why hardware costs fell and put the cost of PCs into the range of the common person. The diversity of hardware may have made open source more likely in some ways (caveats below) but the standardisation of components would not have happened (or at least not as quickly) and hence the benefits of mass production would not have happened.

      The only people really buying computers en masse were businesses and the standard hardware there was IBM, Lotus' spreadsheet software being the killer app. There were far fewer people who could program and no internet so there was limited scope for an open source community. Also the hardware was more expensive until the IBM-clones took to the market. And they only succeeded as they could run MS-DOS and hence the software taht people were used to. In fact they were often advertised as IBM-compatible.

      It also strikes me diverse platforms would just have given software writers headaches (which platform do I write my application for?), users headaches in terms of expecting these programs to run on the very expensive box they'd just bought and swapping data between systems (10 years ago I had to download a special program if someone sent me something from a Mac so I could read the file on a PC - think this was due to different file encryption techniques - but just imagine the chaos and feeling of why doesnt this work from the end user).

      Thinking back, in my neighbourhood when we were growing up there was a bunch of us kids who all had computers which we gamed on - each of us had different hardware - BBC Micro, ZX Spectrum, Atari, Oric and a Vic 20. None of us could share games with each other though going round each others houses was part of the social side of things. As we had the Spectrum ours was the most popular house, though I mistakenly like to think it was cos I was the most popular kid ;-)

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    46. Re:Retirement Gift by kamatsu · · Score: 1

      Well admittedly he did write the interpreter in assembly language, I believe.

    47. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a retirement gift, we could show how easily the empire can be destroyed he built in his lifetime.

    48. Re:Retirement Gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, your jealousy knows no bounds. Just because you haven't achieved jack shit you're trying to play down his monumental achievements.

      If it's all so trivial, why don't you have any of those things? You can start by learning how to read.

    49. Re:Retirement Gift by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      I think implicit in the OP's statement was "and usable without post-grad compsci work."

      Accountants used VisiCalc - it was one of the drivers behind sales of the Apple ][. Secretaries used troff and TeX.

      Back in the days of DOS, all sorts of ordinary people without training in CS could use terminal-based software.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    50. Re:Retirement Gift by zdickinson · · Score: 0

      I don't think he was saying that UNIX came about because of Microsoft. He was saying he wouldn't have switched to UNIX if Microsoft wasn't so crappy.

      --
      I hate ethics, I avoid them on principle.
    51. Re:Retirement Gift by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I thought the discussion was related to Microsoft's power and position in the market. THAT was decided in the late 80s and early 90s. That's right, in the 80s. There's a short book called "StartUp" by Jerry Kaplan. He started Go Inc and created pen based computers in the late 80s. Microsoft's power and control of the industry and press pretty much put his company and idea out of business. There's many of these kinds of stories occurring in the DOS years just as there are in the Windows days.

      Also, there was a robust CPM market prior to DOS and yes, the hardware was very diverse but since IBM really kicked off the 'open hardware' x86 PC market by publishing their hardware design, I can't see how anyone can say it was Microsoft which lead to the standardized PC market. FYI, I cut my teeth on a built-from-scraps CPM machine. I even used a used ATM 12VDC green CRT and home built cabling for the display. Learned CPM, "C" programming, and WordPerfect, Kermit using a terminal app by Tim Paterson. All on that little box in the 80s and it even ran CPM-86 and DOS on an x86 addon card.

      there is no proof of what could have happened but there was enough of a market for software in the 80s to have leveraged the open hardware design IBM created by thinking they could control the market with a proprietary BIOS. Bill Gates and Microsoft went along for the ride IBM opened the door for and used anti-competitive business practices to protect that market since the 80s. They mastered it during their marketing of Windows 95. IMO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    52. Re:Retirement Gift by Nethead · · Score: 1

      No.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    53. Re:Retirement Gift by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Do you think that CPM-86 was not going to run on cloned IBM compatible computers?

      Thanks for reminding me! I've almost forgotten about CP/M... and I used to use it on an Osborne.

      I've always given Microsoft credit for providing one of the building blocks to commodity hardware. But I forgot that the root of Microsoft's success (repackaging QDOS) only existed because CP/M was so late to arrive for the 8086 (as CP/M-86). This highlights the fact that the business model that provided Compaq with a primary component (a compatible OS) was hardly unique to Microsoft (although Microsoft had long been in such a business before DOS - it provided BASIC for many microcomputer platforms of the day). So while Microsoft is a part of the story, it isn't really due to Microsoft's insight or unique position.

    54. Re:Retirement Gift by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Didn't the release of Windows, especially Windows 95, induce a huge increase of demand in IBM compatibles?

      That at least is my impression, and it's kind of supported by a lazy google search. So, CPM-86 doesn't have all that much to do with the growth of the industry and the abundance of cheap hardware it caused.

      There's a few things to consider here. We're talking about the history of the "IBM PC" platform, or rather, the history of commodity computers. And we're also looking at the much larger trends in computing in general. These are intertwined. You can't look at that linked chart without this understanding.

      Commodity hardware is what provides "the growth of the industry and the abundance of cheap hardware." This doesn't begin with Win95. It begins well before Windows.... it begins with DOS. Or rather, DOS plays a key part. However, as the parent suggests, it could have easily been CP/M-86 instead. As a side note... CP/M-86 eventually becomes DR-DOS and there's a lot more interesting history in that.

      So what about the linked chart? Keep in mind that there's overall trends at play. The microcomputer starts as a hobbiest toy. The Apple II and VisiCalc brings the microcomputer to business. IBM follows with the "IBM PC." That's the beginning of the chart. At that point, some folks (like me) have already realized "home computers" but most folks really don't see a reason. And while VisiCalc was the killer app that put microcomputers on the business map, it isn't until the mid-80s that Lotus 1-2-3 provided the killer app for the IBM PC. By this point, IBM had lost control of the platform and the industry is awash in "clones" due to the pioneering steps of Compaq and evidence in outfits like Dell and Gateway 2000.

      Still, the market really is business. The platform is not really a gamer's rig (which starts changing in the late 80s). And it's expensive (both issues that make the Commodore 64 popular at home). Home buyers who buy a IBM clone are, most likely, buying it to take their work home with them. There's little that drives the consumer market for any home computer at all. What consumers needed was the killer app.

      The chart makes it look like Win95 is that killer app. But that's ignoring a rather large event - public awareness of the Internet. Email. The web. Those are killer consumer apps. That's what drives home computer sales. It helps that this is when we're seeing a price war and a push towards the âoesub-$1000 PCâ as Intel, AMD, and Cyrix slug it out in the market. And, of course, we have even more adoption of personal computers in the work place.

      So again - Microsoft is definitely a part of the story. But there's plenty of others who should be credited for these events as well (if not more than Microsoft).

    55. Re:Retirement Gift by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Inventor of the walk-in wallet?

  5. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When can we look forward to a day without Ballmer? That would truly be a day to celebrate.

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But it's so much fun to watch him run Microsoft into the ground. Don't take that away!

    2. Re:So... by Gewalt · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Bill Gates has been bullied around by Steve Ballmer ever since Windows 1.0. The reason Gates' work is never realized is because he's never been in charge. He has done precisely what Steve has told him for years. And Steve ruined his entire image and turned Microsoft from a beloved entity into a corrupted and one of the most hated companies.

      I would LOVE to see Ballmer on the way out instead of Bill. Most of what people really dislike about Microsoft is Ballmer's doing, Gates just didn't have the spine to stand up to him and reel him in.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    3. Re:So... by Zwicky · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know you're joking ("funny cos it's true" humor?), but - and maybe I'm not giving Ballmer enough credit here[0] - I really can't see Ballmer keeping Microsoft afloat in the long-term. Call it a gut feeling. The man is but an ogre really.

      If anything saves Microsoft - aside from its stockpiles of cash - it will be Bill's advice imparted on his one-day-a-week-on-Microsoft-business.

      I am certainly not enamored with Gates by any means, but I do recognize that (in my view) he was the brains behind the outfit: Ballmer is Robin to Gates' Batman; Cashman and Dobbin? "Holy developers, developers, developers, Cashman!"[1]

      Personally unless Microsoft pull something exceptional out of the bag I expect to see them decline as 'market leaders'. I am interested in hearing others', perhaps more informed, thoughts.

      Anyway that's how I see it from my point of view but IANABA (business analyst).

      [0] Stop laughing, I'm trying to be impartial :)
      [1] That right there is why I don't write comic books.

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    4. Re:So... by Hojima · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bill Gates

      The WSJ has an article looking at the struggle Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer had in switching around their Junior/Senior relationship.

      Things became so bitter that, on one occasion, Gates stormed out of a meeting in a huff after a shouting match in which Mr. Ballmer jumped to the defense of several colleagues, according to an individual present at the time. After the exchange, Mr. Ballmer seemed "remorseful," the person said.

      Once Gates leaves, "I'm not going to need him for anything. That's the principle," Mr. Ballmer says. "Use him, yes, need him, no."

      Linus Torvalds

      Ballmer is also known as a vocal critic of competing companies and their products. He has referred to the free Linux software system as a "[â¦] cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches." Ballmer was trying to articulate his concern that the GNU GPL license employed by such software requires that all derivative software be made open source.

      [edit] Lucovsky/Google

      In 2005, Mark Lucovsky alleged in a sworn statement to a Washington state court that Ballmer became highly enraged upon hearing that Lucovsky was about to leave Microsoft for Google, picked up his chair and threw it across his office. Referring to Google CEO Eric Schmidt (who previously worked for competitors Sun and Novell), Ballmer allegedly said, "Fucking Eric Schmidt is a fucking pussy. I'm going to fucking bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to fucking kill Google," then resumed trying to persuade Lucovsky to stay at Microsoft.[14][15] Ballmer has described the incident as a "gross exaggeration of what actually took place."

      Cut directly from wikipedia (probably one of the reasons Microsoft wanted to merge with yahoo)

    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your source on that? I'm genuinely curious.

    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      internet

    7. Re:So... by danwat1234 · · Score: 1

      I thought I read somewhere that Mr.Gates is rather aggressive and can be hard on employees. But maybe not on Mr. Ballmer because they are best friends :)

    8. Re:So... by notaprguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you know how to read an income statement? I suggest you check out http://www.microsoft.com/msft/earnings/FY08/earn_rel_q3_08.mspx#income. If by "run Microsoft into the ground" you mean grow revenue $7 billion from March 07 to March 08 and grow net income by $2.3 billion then I guess you must have very high standards. Or maybe you can't do math.

      PS. Yes, I know there is more to running a company than revenue and income but that's certainly a good start.

    9. Re:So... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The idea of Ballmer standing on Gates' concave chest and dangle-spitting on his face until he gives in his bullying, triple-Y chromosome demands is quite amusing, but Microsoft was corrupt and hated long before Ballmer was in charge. Or does nobody remember Andrew Schulman exposing Microsoft's monopolistic abuses with "Undocumented Windows" almost 20 years ago?

      Remember "It ain't done 'til Lotus won't run"? That's not apocryphal.

      Hell, I ran into undocumented functionality with the first non-trivial Windows program I tried to write. It was a little utility to manage and assign icons in Program Manager, but I could never figure out how to extract the icon resources from executables because... it wasn't documented anywhere. At least in 1990 or so when I was doing this.

      Gates was always a total bastard of a businessman (and only marginally technical at best, just listen to anything he says, he doesn't have a clue) and I don't think you can give credit to the chair-tosser for his long reign of corporate evil.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    10. Re:So... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Or does nobody remember Andrew Schulman exposing Microsoft's monopolistic abuses with "Undocumented Windows" almost 20 years ago?

      Still got my copy on a bookshelf somewhere around here...

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re:So... by Gewalt · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was all Ballmer... He joined Microsoft in 1980, that's 28 years ago. His last job before that was some type of assistant to the CEO of GE.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    12. Re:So... by mevets · · Score: 1

      ....and turned Microsoft from a beloved entity into .....
      When and by whom was MicroSoft ever a 'beloved entity'? They've always been crapware, and gates is most known for whining about the lack of royalties for some mickey mouse version of basic. Its like saying "turned McDonalds from an epicurean ideal into a grease recycler". It was always crap, but sometimes you are either poor or depraved enough to want the crap.

    13. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micro-Soft might have been beloved ... .

    14. Re:So... by drsmithy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember "It ain't done 'til Lotus won't run"? That's not apocryphal.

      Indeed, it's a myth without the slightest shred of credible evidence to back it up.

      "DOS ain't done until Lotus does run" would be a more accurate reflection of reality.

      Hell, I ran into undocumented functionality with the first non-trivial Windows program I tried to write. It was a little utility to manage and assign icons in Program Manager, but I could never figure out how to extract the icon resources from executables because... it wasn't documented anywhere. At least in 1990 or so when I was doing this.

      Undocumented functionality, in and of itself, is in no way evidence of "monopolistic abuses". It is completely normal in any non-trivial piece of software.

    15. Re:So... by Ripit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he needs to take a seat.

    16. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=mtBQ4UCXQeo

      Hungarian way of expressing opinion on corruption of Hungarian goverment with MS.

    17. Re:So... by HappySmileMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And how did he do that?
      Was it by making better products?
      Was it by gaining market share?
      Or was it by making Vista cost shitloads more money than XP?

    18. Re:So... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he can be hard on his employees. Not Steve Jobs hard though, more like a child throwing a tantrum and calling you stupid over and over.

      Ballmer's a really excitable person, which is what made him great for his role during the early years. I could easily see him screaming about burying competitors if he's excited and mad.

    19. Re:So... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 3, Insightful

      McDonald's actually had great food once, early on. And Microsoft wasn't always hated. Remember back when IBM was the big bad? IBM and HP, two sucky companies that wanted to rule the world. Microsoft and Apple were the underdog then.

    20. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How the hell did you get modded interesting? You cite no proof. No links. No sources. Nothing. Just your own damned worthless opinion. If I had mod points, your post would burn in hell.

    21. Re:So... by Gewalt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How the hell did you get modded interesting? You cite no proof. No links. No sources. Nothing. Just your own damned worthless opinion. If I had mod points, your post would burn in hell.

      Maybe because people considered my opinion interesting? You know, they didn't necessarily have to agree with it to think it was interesting.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    22. Re:So... by Phydeaux314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the end, does it really matter? They're making money. As long as it's not obviously unsustainable to the shareholders, anything that brings in cash is good.

      --
      Never underestimate the stupidity inherent in all human beings.
    23. Re:So... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Undocumented functionality, in and of itself, is in no way evidence of "monopolistic abuses"

      You're right, much of it can be attributed to Microsoft's pathetic documentation. Nevertheless, in 1990 you couldn't do many very basic things without reverse engineering. There are multiple books written on the topic that leave it beyond a doubt that only back in those days Microsoft or Microsoft's special "friends" had the information necessary to write software that could compete, performance-wise (as ironic as that is) with Office, or do debugging, or compete with Microsoft fully. they stacked the deck in their own favor from the get-go and have never let up.

      While this may no longer be true, especially because Microsoft products these days are almost never the best in their fields, and are often pathetic also-rans, the damage was done long ago. In fact, these days Microsoft has been coasting on inertia for years, all their efforts going into maintaining lock-in and stifling competition because that's all they have left.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    24. Re:So... by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      So Bill Gates has been held hostage at chair point.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    25. Re:So... by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for Microsoft to hire Darl McBride as Ballmers successor.

    26. Re:So... by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Look at how many PCs sold VS how many copies of Vista,and that will tell you the true story. When my 67 year old mom who don't know squat about computers comes to me and goes "What is Vista and why does it suck?" you know you have a problem. Also look at the emerging markets of green PCs and netbooks,neither of which will EVER run Vista. And how many billions are they losing on the x360? I know Sony lost 3.3 billion on PS3 and after that recall and warranty extension I doubt they are doing better.


      Trust me,I am no Linux or Apple fanboi,having used and made money off MSFT products since the days of DOS and Win3.1. But the simple fact is even teeny boppers that don't know the difference between a PC and a VCR come with their parents to get a new PC and I mention Vista I get an EXTREMELY loud EEEEW!,like I took a crap in front of them or something. Even my local Wal Mart has been making it clear that on every sale of a laptop they'll at no extra charge put XP on it just to keep from losing sales. And after being given a copy of Vista for being a beta tester and giving up after nearly a month to get that POS to run decent on my 3GHz Celeron I gave up and gave it away,only to find out later that it keeps changing hands like a bad fruitcake. So far I've had 4 people install it just to go "Yuck" a week or two later and go back to XP and pass it off to someone else.


      The simple fact is inertia can let them go for awhile. But I've had more businesses lately start asking about "This Linux thing"(which for some reason they insist on calling Lienucks no matter how many times I correct them) than I have ever had before. If Win7 doesn't come out a lot more like XP and a lot less like Vista then I predict that those with money will be switching to Macs and those without will either pirate XP or come to someone like me to build them a PC from scratch with XP on it. I just hope that after Jan 2009 I'll still be able to find XP OEM cds or I might be buying a lot of used barebone systems just for the XP CALs. But so far my customers are willing to pay extra NOT to have the Vista "experience" on their new PC. And as always this is my 02c from out here in consumerland,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    27. Re:So... by thealsir · · Score: 1

      If most Microsoft products were also-rans, the market would reflect that.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
    28. Re:So... by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to see the wisdom of appointing Ballmer. Notice how even the most vitriolic MS haters are now saying Gates wasn't so bad, he was just misunderstood.

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    29. Re:So... by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the more Ballmer gets in control, the worse Microsoft seems to become. I just wish Gates had the balls to fire Ballmer and take control himself.

      `Jarik

    30. Re:So... by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Things became so bitter that, on one occasion, Gates stormed out of a meeting in a huff after a shouting match in which Mr. Ballmer jumped to the defense of several colleagues, according to an individual present at the time. After the exchange, Mr. Ballmer seemed "remorseful," the person said.

      Really makes you think - what happens behind the closed doors?

      Ballmer: We will create a monopoly. The next version of Windows will not run any non-Microsoft software! Muwahahaha!
      Gates: But that is wrong! That destroys the market!
      Ballmer: What did you say to me boy!?
      Gates: B-B-But that'll lower the quality of our product. W-W-We need to take care of our customers!
      Ballmer: *narrows eyes* You've been reading Slashdot, haven't you boy?
      Gates: N-No!
      Ballmer: Don't make me use the chair on you...Have you forgotten all I've taught you?
      GateS:N-No!
      Ballmer: Then tell me, what matters?!
      Gates: Developers?
      Ballmer: Indeed. Now run along now. And if I hear any of this nonsense again, I bring out the chair.

      ~Jarik

    31. Re:So... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You distilled out the one point Ballmer makes that matters, and just shuffled it into your parody without noticing.

      'Developers' is really, really important. The lack of developers is what killed BeOS. It is one of the only things saving Linux...

      Criticize Ballmer and Microsoft for many things. The 'Monkey Dance' was just a ludicrous delivery. The message was VERY valid.

    32. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know you're joking ("funny cos it's true" humor?), but - and maybe I'm not giving Ballmer enough credit here[0] - I really can't see Ballmer keeping Microsoft afloat in the long-term. Call it a gut feeling. The man is but an ogre really.

      Considering your gut probably told you this was the year of Teh Lunix on Teh Desktop every year for the past 15 years... something tells me your gut doesn't have that great of a track record.

      MS's greatest asset has been in the enemies they have selected. MS enters a market, focuses on improving their product, and just wait around for their competition to self-destruct.

      And that's bearing out right now in the search market- Yahoo is imploding, and Google is in bed with them now. So all MS has to do is wait around for Google's highly paid and under worked PHDs to drive the company under. Ballmer understands- Google is a one-trick pony. What do they make money on besides search? Then, they paid insane amounts of money for stuff which does nothing but increase the amount of money they squander every year. Like YouTube.

      One of two things is going to happen with GOOG. Either the shareholders will start wondering why so much of the company's profit is being spent on stupid shit, and begin firing all the top management and replacing them with advertising execs... or else the company will simply wither on the vine, like a Yahoo, Hotbot, Lycos, AskJeeves, etc etc etc. My bet is on the latter.

      Want to see a recent example of this in action? How about the XBox? Sony just imploded, and their PS3 failure almost destroyed the company. The only thing that saved Sony from becoming a MS acquisition was that Sony managed to pay off enough people to guarantee a Blu-Ray success. Without that... Sony was screwed. And hey, they may still be screwed. They certainly lost the lucrative console market. And all it took was MS being there and waiting for them to screw up.

      MS understands that when you pick the right enemies, your success is assured. And Ballmer understands this too, as his masterful destruction of Yahoo demonstrates.

    33. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, which wikipedia article would that be? Please mod parent down -1 Fails to Cite Sources

    34. Re:So... by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yeah, agreed. Developers are really really important.

      But Ballmer seems focused on forgetting about end-consumers. He seems to be more focused on how to push the OS on the consumer than making a quality product the public want to buy.

      ~Jarik

    35. Re:So... by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      This is +5 Funny if I ever saw one. :)

      Developers indeed.

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    36. Re:So... by houghi · · Score: 1

      and turned Microsoft from a beloved entity into a corrupted and one of the most hated companies.

      So he had a grip on him already in February 1976. Interesting.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    37. Re:So... by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      How do they do that? Developing countries. There's literally billions of first-time PC users just waiting to be endoctrinated the 'MS way' from the first time they turn on their computers.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    38. Re:So... by gadget+junkie · · Score: 3, Funny

      [...]

      If anything saves Microsoft - aside from its stockpiles of cash - it will be Bill's advice imparted on his one-day-a-week-on-Microsoft-business.

      I am certainly not enamored with Gates by any means, but I do recognize that (in my view) he was the brains behind the outfit: [...]


      Yes, Gates was the brain behind the outfit. But the real Father of Microsoft will remain hidden in an obscure paper file at IBM: " Nah, Dr-dos costs too much, the guy wants 50 bucks per copy. Let's give the contract to the boy with the funny glasses."

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    39. Re:So... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      It's more a matter of strategy. Many companies who chase the short-term pay-off do so at the expense of strategic goals that would pay off down the line, but cost them in the short term.

      MS always seemed to have a strategy of some form in the past, and it's obviously paid off. The question is whether they'll continue to do so under new leadership, or whether they'll start chasing the quick buck over the sustainability of the revenue stream. This is the idea behind their XBox line, for instance. It's a loser now, but they're hoping to make it pay off. That's strategic. Cutting that off would pay in short term savings, but give them less diversity and cut off a potential revenue stream. (Just an example - don't be too harsh.)

      Most companies have room to do both, but it's a balancing act. Moreso, it becomes a matter of corporate culture. If the quick buck becomes the gold standard, the company work ethic suffers. That's when companies really start to slide.

    40. Re:So... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Hi fees on windows 2003 / 2008 servers, and SQL servers, for solutions that never use more than 2gig of databases, that could have easily been implemented using free sql express or mysql.

      But managers earning 250k approve those 5000x10 licences for sql servers and hire those ms sql DBAs to do the job.

      Only because its too hard to find mysql DBAs in suits and ties.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    41. Re:So... by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 1

      But the simple fact is even teeny boppers that don't know the difference between a PC and a VCR come with their parents to get a new PC and I mention Vista I get an EXTREMELY loud EEEEW!,like I took a crap in front of them or something.

      People don't know the difference between Microsoft Word and Windows XP, yet they know that 'Vista' is a synonym for 'crap.'
      Even people that don't know what an operating system is are asking me 'won't Vista make my computer really slow?'

      Hopefully Microsoft can fix the issues with Windows 7 (wishful thinking, I know).

    42. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get serious. Developers were eager for BeOS (I know I was). Microsoft's choke-hold on OEMs killed it.

    43. Re:So... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Either the shareholders will start wondering why so much of the company's profit is being spent on stupid shit, and begin firing all the top management

      I take that you didn't read the way that GOOG sells it's shares. My understanding is that the regular shareholders will never have enough voting power to override Google's overlords. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

      Sony was screwed. And hey, they may still be screwed. They certainly lost the lucrative console market

      And your giving all the credit for that to MSFT? Didn't this thing have something to do with it? Does MSFT have an answer for that yet?

      Ballmer understands- Google is a one-trick pony. What do they make money on besides search?

      And what happens if Google leverages it's internet operations into a application hosting platform that makes the PC into a fancy dumb terminal? What does MSFT look like if the Windows/Office monopoly goes away?

      I don't know which one of them will win but I think you are being far too dismissive of Google and giving Ballmer way too much credit. If he thinks Google is a one trick pony and that search isn't all that why does he get wet every time he thinks about buying up Yahoo?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    44. Re:So... by A12m0v · · Score: 1

      the X360 has been profitable now for 3 quarters

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    45. Re:So... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      And if the market were that fantastic, the Cigarette companies would have come up with a cure for lung cancer a long time ago.

      Most of the pro-MS posts in this thread all rely on the "They're rich so they must have done something right" argument, and that's missing huge chunks of the story.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    46. Re:So... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1
      I know that by their "math" the X360 is profitable,but does it figure in the extended warranties and the huge amount of repairs? I only know of 2 guys that have X360s,one was an early adopter and is now one his fifth under warranty replacement,the other is on his third. I can't see how the massive failures can equal a good bottom line,either through cost or PR.


      Ans what will this failure rate do to long term sales? My oldest still buys games and accessories for his original Xbox while the X360 looks like it will be all but wiped out once MSFT quits supporting it. I have known quite a few console gamers from school and they all saved up for a PS3 simply because the failure rate of the X360 turned them off the product. And surely having to pay for the repairs and return shipping for so many units HAS to be hurting the bottom line.


      The only reason I ask is MSFT has a history of fudging its numbers. Just look at how they counted SHIPPED Vista CALs as sales,instead of using activation and WGA to give out a clear picture of Vista adoption rates. I know that one of the biggest sellers in both my shop and the other shops in the area that I have talked to is folks wanting Vista stripped off their new machine and XP put on. It is bad enough I send those with a Vista that has downgrade rights down the street so they can deal with the hassle of getting it downgraded instead of me,LOL.


      So does anyone know if the X360 numbers include the losses incurred by repairs and returns? Or do we need to take the figures with a grain of salt as "MSFT math". I used to be a fan of MSFT products,and am still typing this on an 8 year old Win2K pro box that is solid as a rock. But it seems IMHO that MSFT has seriously lost their focus in the last couple of years and seems to be all over the place as a company,and dedicating WAY too much of their time and resources on the home newbies and multimedia markets while letting their business and gamer clients down in a big way. No Bitlocker in Vista Business? No Dx10 for XP? Bad moves,and is why so many will end up sticking with DX9 and XP. But as always this is my 02c from out here in consumerland,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    47. Re:So... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, Captain, remember it was the same mentality that the robber barons of the 19th century used to justify themselves.

      Defending Microsoft on its financial success is to take a totally objectivist, cutthroat mentality of unfettered capitalism, or to be woefully ignorant.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    48. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I am posting as an Anonymous Coward.

      But you statement of "And how many billions are they losing on the x360? I know Sony lost 3.3 billion on PS3 and after the recall and warranty extension I doubt they are doing better." is what is one of the biggest problem with people. Opinions are formed not on facts and the truth but on what they think.

      A quick search finds that Microsoft expects to make money this fiscal year, and has been making money for the last 2 quarters at the time the article was written.

      http://play.tm/story/18650

    49. Re:So... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Did you even read my post? I said that according to MSFT they were making a profit,but I could find NOTHING that said whether or not they were adding in the costs of the recalls and having to extend the warranty. As we have seen before from MSFT they have some great accountants that can play with the numbers and make anything sound good. And unlike most companies they can cover the losses from something like the X360 recalls and warranty extension with cash from other divisions. So before you say I am going on opinion,why don't you show me a reference where they say flat footed that the cost of the recall and warranty repairs are figured into the numbers. because I couldn't find it anywhere.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  6. What would I buy him? by hostyle · · Score: 1

    Double glazing, a tin of varnish and some brushes, and some efficient window security products.

    --
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  7. Last day, huh? by Foddz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please tell me they're giving him the high tech 'security walk'!

    1. Re:Last day, huh? by azuredrake · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, this made me laugh. Can you see Gates being escorted out slowly by the HR head, all the young employees chanting "Dead Man Walking" as he goes by? That'd be truly bizarre.

      --
      Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
    2. Re:Last day, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! Best post on /. in a long time. Thanks for the laugh!!

    3. Re:Last day, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I figured that they would be singing something like "Ding dong the witch is dead!"

    4. Re:Last day, huh? by dwye · · Score: 1

      You DO realize that he will still be there one day every two weeks, on average? He isn't retiring, he is just cutting down to 10%. He also controls the company due to his (and his Foundation's) stock ownership - expecting him to be treated in anything less than the manner that he currently is would be ridiculous.

    5. Re:Last day, huh? by descil · · Score: 1

      but... Ballmer is still there...

  8. I would get him. . . by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 0

    Good programmers!

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    1. Re:I would get him. . . by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      MS has good programmers. They have bad project leaders though. It is very hard to fix something that was broken code-wise such as Windows, even with the greatest programmers. Taking DOS which was bought, and advancing it to Windows and then NT while maintaining native compatability is very hard even with great coders.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:I would get him. . . by rs79 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Taking DOS which was bought, and advancing it to Windows and then NT "

      NT was a clean-room effort spearheaded by Dave Cutler who did Vax VMS; that's why NT sorta works.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:I would get him. . . by Foofoobar · · Score: 4, Funny

      MS has good programmers...

      ...unfortunately they don't let any of them touch the code.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    4. Re:I would get him. . . by nawcom · · Score: 0

      Taking DOS which was bought, and advancing it to Windows and then NT

      In anticipation of the Macintosh launch, Bill Gates, co-founder, chairman of Microsoft was given several Macintosh prototypes in 1983 for software development for the new computer. In 1985, Microsoft launched Microsoft Windows, its own GUI for IBM PCs using many of the elements of the Macintosh OS. This led to a long legal battle between Apple Computer and Microsoft, ending with an out of court settlement. In this settlement it was stated that Microsoft would be granted access to and allowed unlimited use of the Macintosh GUI. ((via wikipedia)

      "Taking DOS which was bought, and taking Windows from a Macintosh Prototype, and then paid off VMS and RSX-11 developers to get to NT.."

      There. Much better.

    5. Re:I would get him. . . by FurryOne · · Score: 1

      "Taking DOS which was bought, and advancing it to Windows and then NT "

      NT was a clean-room effort spearheaded by Dave Cutler who did Vax VMS; that's why NT sorta works.

      You believe that bullsh*t? NT had OS/2 code in it, period. That's why it ran character mode OS/2 applications. In fact, some of the error messages still said OS/2 after 3.1 was released. (I still have some of the OS/2 apps I got when I went to NT school)

    6. Re:I would get him. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about getting DOS users to eventually become NT users. It's not just about the origin of the code. The equivalent in the Mac world was the switch to OSX... completely different OS, same users.

    7. Re:I would get him. . . by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      "Taking DOS which was bought, and advancing it to Windows and then NT "

      NT was a clean-room effort spearheaded by Dave Cutler who did Vax VMS; that's why NT sorta works.

      I've got an NT server box at work, heavily firewalled off, or course, that's still in use because of a proprietary application. It's been running for 10 years now, with relatively few reboots. It's not QNX by any means, but aside from hardware repair, it typically only needs a reboot every few months or so. NT 4 was, in fact, pretty stable if you configured it correctly. Like other Microsoft OS's, many of NT's reputed problems were not with the OS itself, but apps that ran on it *COUGH*IIS 4*COUGH*... and the truth is, from Win2K onwards, their server products have mostly been very good. Win2K8 is beginning to look, in fact, like an outstanding product. Credit where credit is due, folks.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    8. Re:I would get him. . . by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Yup, when NT 3.x went titsup, it would sometimes display a !OS2 error. Pretty funny.

      I would say:
      The kernel came from Cutler
      The networking and filesystems came from OS/2
      And the application libraries came from the Windows group.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    9. Re:I would get him. . . by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      David Cutler was definetly hired for the kernel. NT had a OS/2 subssystem in it that could run textbased os/2 apps. other part os os/2 were used as well. THing is NT was supposed to be OS/2 3.0 but collabortion between IBM and MS didn't work out as MS wanted to push their windows API. I think wikipedia sums it up quite well (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT)

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  9. 640kb!!!! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 386SX with 640KB of memory.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:640kb!!!! by brouski · · Score: 5, Funny

      That should be all he'll ever need.

      Oh wait, You don't mind me karma-whoring off you, do you?

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    2. Re:640kb!!!! by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      Oh damn--you beat me to it. (Although I wasn't going to throw in the 386!)

      A copy of Microsoft Bob (don't laugh--it's probably a collector's item now!), a Mac and a freshly burned copy of Ubuntu for when he gets fed up with using Vista.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    3. Re:640kb!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Too bad you don't get karma off of funny mods eh?

    4. Re:640kb!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1-2 MB was standard by then. How about a 12 Mhz 286, with a 20 MB hard drive, 640 KB RAM (in DIPPs!), running Windows 2.0? I think I got a stack of floppies for that somewhere. Even back in the day Windows was bloatware crap.

    5. Re:640kb!!!! by Locutus · · Score: 1

      and a copy of Microsoft Bob.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    6. Re:640kb!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a collector's item. Thanks for posting a link to my Microsoft Bob exhibit! I have two original shrinkwrapped retail packages of Bob 1.00 -- one on 3½" floppies and the other on CD. It is a collectible because there is nothing else quite like it and Microsoft is so ashamed of it they have almost no mention of it on their own website (do a search on microsoft.com for Microsoft Bob). The more Microsoft tries to hide it the more interesting it becomes.

      Myself, I'd give Bill Gates a framed portrait of the splash screen of IBM OS/2 2.0 (the first version IBM released after the IBM/Microsoft alliance fell apart) for him to mount above his virtual fireplace.

      Thanks again for the link!

      Dan Rose
      Dan's 20th Century Abandonware
      http://www.d2ca.org/

      (Oops! There went my anonymity! :)

    7. Re:640kb!!!! by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      If that was all the ram it had, it'd be fine. Crank it up to a meg and watch the extended/high mem fun begin. Seriously, it now makes me wonder if old Billy ever had to fuck around with different boot disks and copy con a bunch of different config.sys and autoexec.bat's on a daily basis. And if he did, why did it take ten years to fix? (well, '95 didn't really fix it, but I can pretend.) Or did his future self use the time machine he'll no doubt have and go back with a copy of vista and they've just been piecing it out over the last 20 years? Makes sense, he was leaving and taking it with him, so they had to rush the whole thing out on a generation of hardware that wasn't quite there yet...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    8. Re:640kb!!!! by brouski · · Score: 1

      Who lets facts get in the way of a good post?

      Are you new here?

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  10. many years of therapy by fdisk3hs · · Score: 1

    Many, many fscking years of therapy.

    1. Re:many years of therapy by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Many, many chkdsking years of therapy.

      fixed

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  11. A handshake. by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Without him, I am not sure that personal technology would have taken off, and it would only be at work that I could do things like waste time on the internet and argue with strangers.

    1. Re:A handshake. by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      But it would have. Remember, MS didn't create DOS, and Unix was before DOS. So rather then struggling with computers we might be able to use them.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:A handshake. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gates helped provide one of the keys to commodity microcomputer platforms. That key was DOS. And while Microsoft didn't code it, they did make the deal that allowed them to license it to more than one hardware manufacturer. This helped give other players such as Compaq the compatibility target they needed once they were able to reverse engineer IBM's BIOS and develop their own machines. And thus the IBM clone and the beginnings of commodity hardware.

      The point here is that Bill Gates WAS an important figure. He did some key things - and should get credit. But there's a limit to how much credit is due.

    3. Re:A handshake. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Mac: January 1984
      Windows 1.0: November 1985

    4. Re:A handshake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without him, I am not sure that personal technology would have taken off

      Of course it would have. The demand was there. If Bill was never born, someone else would have stepped up. In fact, plenty of his competitors were stepping up, but got stepped on instead.

    5. Re:A handshake. by intx13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How does this myth stay alive? There were personal computers before Bill Gates: Macs. There were personal computers during the early rise of Microsoft: Macs, OS/2, Suns. There were personal computers throughout the Bill Gates glory days: Macs, Linux, (and Suns, kinda). And there are personal computers today. And there would have been personal computers without Bill Gates.

      That's not to say his contributions are worthless, but let's not start patting him too hard on the back just because he's retiring. He used questionably ethical business practices to produce and sell products of questionable quality.

      On the plus side, he's going to spend the rest of his life giving away enormous sums of money to charity - there's not much to dislike about that!

    6. Re:A handshake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop regurgitating history and put yourself into it.

      A geek in a basement at that time isn't going to do much. You need that geek's work to be marketed and spread to the masses. History already shows that to be true.

      Only now at this point in time, with our current infrastructure, could the geek do both ends (provided no photos were included).

    7. Re:A handshake. by plover · · Score: 1

      Without him, I am not sure that personal technology would have taken off, and it would only be at work that I could do things like waste time on the internet and argue with strangers.

      For that very reason, I'd give him the bird. Without Windows, 90% of today's computer users out there wouldn't own computers at all. The internet would be more like it was in the early 90s. A nice quiet place for geeks to hang out and swap lies, without all of those fscktards from myspace, faceplant or AOL.

      And get off my lawn, too!

      --
      John
    8. Re:A handshake. by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All of which were very much proprietary. The key to the low cost PC as the competition among hardware makers. Go look at Sun, Macs, and PS/2 machines (Commodore, Amiga, and Atari should probably be added to that list of yours). From that era Suns and Macs were proprietary. The moment, Macs tried to license the hardware, the company very nearly went out of business. Sun sold great, solid equipment, and could never get it even close to the price point to compete (I also am not sure they wanted to). PS/2's? That whole line died a horrible death due to the proprietary bus (Micro Channel). The PC world thrived and took when the ISA bus was king, and IBM published all of the hardware specs for 3rd party cards (and thus the hardware that specs for the bus). The PC world thrived and took off when Compaq won the landmark case allowing them to reverse engineer the IBM Bios. The PC world thrived and took off when the Microsoft negotiated the deal with IBM to sell MS-DOS that was licensed to IBM as PC-DOS. The PC world thrived and took off when Intel got competitors in Cyrix, AMD, and other hardware makers creating x86 clone chips.

      It was the fact that there was stiff competition for virtually every part in a machine. It was the nasty world evil consumer that bought, cheap crappy hardware, that got the economies of scale going. If you look at the PC world, the PC used to cost $3,000 (probably $10,000, but $3K is what I paid for my first machine in '95). The competition in an open market place (read, not Mac's, not Sun, not IBM's PS/2), are what created and won virtually all of the market place. The competition eventually drove the price of a PC to under $500, all the while getting, better and better hardware. Eventually the price got low enough, that it started to add more and more features that used to be the sole purview of high end "Workstation", or "Server" class machines. There's a reason that Sun sells what is effectively, nothing more then a jumped up version of the modern day desktop machine as their entry level server. I'm here to tell you that, Bill and Co. have a place at that table of folks who were there and part of what made it happen.

      Does that make Bill a good person? No (but just because that doesn't make him good, doesn't imply that he's bad). Does that mean, Bill intended this move to accomplish that? Probably not. I think Bill Gates figured out fairly early on that hardware was rapidly becoming a commodity market, and that software was the thing that people had a true affinity for. If they could run the same software on different hardware, what did they care? In the end, he was correct. Just ask Apple. There's a reason Apple nearly went out of business when somebody else undercut their hardware (both because the model was setup all wrong, and that people didn't really care about Mac the hardware, they cared about Mac the interface). Most folks couldn't care less about the iMac, the Mac Mini, the iPod, or the iPhone in the hardware. What most of them really care about is how useful and easy the software is for them to use. I have a Mac and I hate the interface. I find it counter-intuitive, but only because I don't think "if I want this and that to work together, I should drag one to the other".

      Windows in all its incarnations, and all of it's vile issues. It filled in the gap that allowed the PC computers to be usable by folks who couldn't have otherwise. For that alone, Bill and Co. deserve a place in history and helping to drive the PC revolution. Would something else have filled that need? Sure, but Bill was there. Would somebody else have discovered gravity? Sure, but we give Newton credit, because he was there and did what he did. If the PC market had been left to Sun, Apple, and IBM, they'd be carving huge chunks of a smaller pie, at much higher profit margins. None of them got that if they sold crappy stuff that was just above the crappy line.

      Kirby

    9. Re:A handshake. by notaprguy · · Score: 1

      All of those examples of PC's before Microsoft...Macs, OS/2, Sun workstations...are the problem. They were all islands running on non-standard hardware running incompatible operating systems. The great thing about Windows was that it provided a standard platform that any developer with half a brain could built cool apps for. The result was a huge amount of innovation from thousands of companies including, yes, Microsoft itself.

    10. Re:A handshake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot admin! My kingdom for a "-1 puke!" option!

    11. Re:A handshake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without MS and it's ever increasingly resource hungry OS I doubt the developments in personal computers would have gone as fast as it did, Unix/Linux/etc runs fine on 10 year old hardware. I think Windows created the market for the GHz and beyond computer.

      Now I'm sure Vista and Windows 7 provide the incentive to develop the next order of magnitude, towards the standard quad core 10 GHz processors with a terrabyte of RAM, I'd say that's enough to run Vista *and* a word processor. :)

    12. Re:A handshake. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Umm, Macs are from *after* Bill Gates' rise started... You could have given other examples, like Apple IIs, but AppleSoft BASIC is from Microsoft too.

    13. Re:A handshake. by loftwyr · · Score: 1

      There were Apple computers before Bill Gates, but the Macintosh wasn't launched until 1984.

    14. Re:A handshake. by dwye · · Score: 1

      > There were personal computers during the early rise of Microsoft

      Yes. S-100 bus boat anchors running CP/M, or some unnetworked Unix for the MC68000-based machines.

      > : Macs, OS/2, Suns

      Nope, sorry. They may have preceded Windows 3, but none did DOS 1.1, which was NOT the QDOS that MS bought from Seattle Computing. Probably none did DOS 2.0, which was very different.

      > because he's retiring.

      No, he is not. He is just drastically reducing his hours. He can come back any time that he wants. Would YOU try to tell the controlling stockholder that he cannot?

      > there's not much to dislike about that!

      People can hate Mother Teresa, they can still hate him. Unless they start making YouTube videos of him playing lawn tennis or croquet, like they did for John D. Rockefeller to turn him from the "evil monopolist" to the grandfatherly dodderer that he appears in the old movie reels.

    15. Re:A handshake. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Nope. Do you actually believe this? DOS/Windows wasn't any better than any other system around, and arguably worse (I argue that it was worse).

      Most importantly, the 'standard' platform wasn't standard, it was IBM's proprietary attempt to dominate the PC market (there were a lot of contenders....Apple, Atari, Commodore, TI, etc). IBM made mistakes with how their system was set up, allowing competitors to reverse engineer it, and the IBM clone was created. THIS became standard. If anyone is to deserve credit, it is either Columbia or Eagle since they did the hard work, and took the blow from the subsequent IBM lawsuit.

      --
      Qxe4
    16. Re:A handshake. by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I remember the 8 bit/64K pre-Microsoft era well:

      Apple ][ was the dominant platform
      Commodore Pets (we had them at school)
      Radio Shack TRS-80
      Atari 400's & 800s

      The 6502 was the most popular CPU at the time, although some machines were Z80 based.

      Almost everything ran on some version of ROM based interpreted Basic. None had any sort of compiler. Games & other apps were hand coded in assembly

      Dedicated monitors were for the rich - for the most part, your TV was the monitor.

      1200/2400 baud casette tape loaders were the most popular storage device. Eventually 8 inch or 5 1/4 inch floppies appeared for the Uber wealthy that could store about 100K of data

      Most 16 bit minicomputers were the size of desks

      My dream machine was a PDP-11/03 with the 8 inch floppy drives (worth about as much as a car, but it was a true 16 bit machine and had an optional compiler)

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    17. Re:A handshake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without him, I am not sure that personal technology would have taken off, and it would only be at work that I could do things like waste time on the internet and argue with strangers.

      Computers were going to "take off" with or without Microsoft, and just because they were there to capitalize from it does not make it their doing completely.

    18. Re:A handshake. by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    19. Re:A handshake. by notaprguy · · Score: 1

      I agree with your point on IBM. But we were talking about Microsoft and their forsight to see that providing an OS that ran any any IBM-compatible/X86 hardware would provide developers with a lot of value and drive innovation. Apple was the company that made the mistake. They provided an only half-open platform. Anyone could build software for a MacOS (if you were willing to try hard enough and deal with their lousy libraries and tools) but only if it ran on Apple hardware.

    20. Re:A handshake. by dodobh · · Score: 1

      That's not Microsoft, that's Compaq. Microsoft merely rode the gravy train.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    21. Re:A handshake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there is. That money isn't rightfully his, and he isn't giving it back to the customers and competitors he leeched it out of.

    22. Re:A handshake. by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      And the IBM-PCs were not proprietary how? They were reverse-engineered, exploiting a intellectual property loophole, by Compaq (now HP).

      Had BG and MS not been there at the right time, we would have had CPM-86 instead, everything as horrid and capable as DOS 1.0, and just as licensable to everybody. Not much would have changed. IBM could even have decided to licence USCD-Pascal as the OS and we would have had a high-level language, a virtual machine and a preemptive multitasking O/S in consumer PCs in 1981! Java-like concepts almost 20 years ahead of their time.

      Like you write, it is the competition in the hardware place that drove the prices down. MS contribution in that domain is close to zero unless you count mice and keyboard as important.

  12. He already has my love by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    And that was all he ever really wanted or needed.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:He already has my love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and mine!

  13. The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by gQuigs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft and proprietary software. What is good for Microsoft and proprietary software conflicts with a lot of good charitable work.

    Giving any poor organization the first copy of Microsoft software for no cost isn't going to help them in the long term.

    To do this, he needs to get rid of his stake in Microsoft stock.

    1. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by Applekid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is good for Microsoft and proprietary software conflicts with a lot of good charitable work.

      True. Although...

      When I was a kid I used to dream of being rich and famous. As I get older the famous part gets more and more obvious as being a hassle, and the rich part gets more and more "evil"... money scraped off the backs of others and hoarded for a life of excess (well, also as I get older, mostly for hookers, blackjack, and blow).

      Let's face it. There are no people who had amassed Gates' level of wealth by writing a bunch of checks and being nice people.

      He did have a vision, and did contribute to some massively impressive things in computing, and got swept up in his business. A lifetime of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. Setting in motion the wheels of a kind of proprietary software golem. Point being, maybe he saw that bit of The Simpsons:

      "How do you sleep at night?"
      "On a pile of money surrounded by beautiful women."

      Thing is, if you had that much wealth and power and you grew a conscience (or at the very least it got a hand free and escaped its bindings), how would you fix it? How would you stand to the side of your parents' graves and say, "I've made you proud, and the world is a better place for you having birthed me"?

      He can't tear down Microsoft. It's a beast onto it's own. All that's left is to try and compensate for some of that evil elsewhere. Charity is a pretty good spot to recoup karma, IMHO. Certainly better than hookers, blackjack, and coke.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Charity is a pretty good spot to recoup karma, IMHO. Certainly better than hookers, blackjack, and coke.

      The "Charity" is a front. It makes for-profit investments and has pledged not to review its investments for their ethical acceptability. Everything you need to know about the Gates foundation can be summed up by their response to Dark cloud over good works of Gates Foundation, an LA Times investigative article (I know, I was as shocked as you must be) which tells the story of the Gates Foundation's investment in big oil that is killing people in the places in which they claim to try to be saving them. This is my favorite paragraph:

      The Gates Foundation has poured $218 million into polio and measles immunization and research worldwide, including in the Niger Delta. At the same time that the foundation is funding inoculations to protect health, The Times found, it has invested $423 million in Eni, Royal Dutch Shell, Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and Total of France â" the companies responsible for most of the flares blanketing the delta with pollution, beyond anything permitted in the United States or Europe.

      Now, keep in mind that the Gates Foundation is not restricted to making holding investments, they are allowed to make them for profit. The profit ostensibly goes right back into charity, right? But here's the issue. As of January 2007 (when the article was published) they'd spent nearly twice as much on sucking oil out of the region (killing people in the process) than on actually helping anyone! And let's not get into what percentage of that money spent is actually applied effectively...

      Bill Gates is not interested in helping anyone. Remember how the idea of a presidential bid for Gates was floated in the media? That was not a mistake. It was a test. It did not go over well; millions of the best-connected people on the planet certainly spoke their mind on the issue on every public forum they could find. Now, he is sitting on top of one of the largest fortunes on the planet, in charge of doling out money both to the greedy companies raping the land, and to help people who are being harmed by them. If you follow the money, though, you can see where priorities lie.

      Gates has placed himself in a position of power which makes his former position at the top of Microsoft look like the elementary school yard bully on top of the pitcher's mound winning a game of king of the hill, and this is not a cause for celebration. He is not there to do good deeds.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bill Murray once observed, if you want to be rich and famous, try being rich first. See if that's enough.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      He can't tear down Microsoft. It's a beast onto it's own. All that's left is to try and compensate for some of that evil elsewhere. Charity is a pretty good spot to recoup karma, IMHO. Certainly better than hookers, blackjack, and coke.

      Getting good karma with hookers? Please, PLEASE, explain this further.

    5. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by spatley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You obviously have no idea how big giving works in the world. If you don't like Bill that is fine, but the Gates Foundation is doing significant good work in many areas of poverty, disease and global development. It has never been a standard for a charity to make its investments align with its mission, its investments are to fund its mission. Even joe sixpack with an IRA has investments that do not perfectly align with his morality; and a single article from one sensationalist from the LA Times is not the bar against which to measure.

    6. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by kz45 · · Score: 1

      "and the rich part gets more and more "evil"... money scraped off the backs of others and hoarded for a life of excess (well, also as I get older, mostly for hookers, blackjack, and blow)."

      I think you have realized that becoming rich is not easy, especially if you want to make an honest living. It's much easier to go in to a regular 9-5 and sit on your ass and get paid..with little to no risk.

      It's easy to say that you don't want to become rich or famous, but most likely..you couldn't be either if you tried your hardest.

      The act of being rich is not evil. It seems to be a popular thing to say, but many people that are rich have earned it.

      "Let's face it. There are no people who had amassed Gates' level of wealth by writing a bunch of checks and being nice people."

      It depends on what you consider nice. I don't consider making a profit mean, but if you want to stay in business..you can' give your money away either.

      "Thing is, if you had that much wealth and power and you grew a conscience (or at the very least it got a hand free and escaped its bindings), how would you fix it? How would you stand to the side of your parents' graves and say, "I've made you proud, and the world is a better place for you having birthed me"?"

      If you are bill gates..it's easy. He brought computers into a large percentage of homes and has donated a large percentage of his wealth.

      Can you say the same thing about ANY of the open source community leaders?

    7. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by plover · · Score: 1

      To do this, he needs to get rid of his stake in Microsoft stock.

      I'd be afraid that would spell financial death for Microsoft. If Gates were to suddenly dump all his MSFT, the markets would react violently. The traders would infer all kinds of reasons why he might be selling off, based on some variation of "he knows something we don't". They'd also consider that his stock currently will continue to give him a clear voice of the shareholders, one that would be silenced without his stock. Their stock price would plunge like Wile E. Coyote off a cliff, possibly depleting their cash reserves before they could recover.

      Whether the Microsoft-bashers around here agree or not, Microsoft is seen as part of the infrastructure that's holding up every Fortune 500 company. If the traders thought that Microsoft wasn't reliable, they'd start questioning every company's ability to function in a world without Microsoft. I wouldn't be surprised if such an action would throw the rest of the U.S. market into a spiral (and possibly the global markets, too.) The economic malaise would likely be worse than the market effects following 9/11.

      So Bill is essentially bound to his stock out of social responsibility. Sure, he can sell a few percent every year for some pocket money, but unless he donates it flat-out to charity, he can't get out from underneath it all without serious repercussions to the rest of us.

      It's really, really weird to contemplate that kind of power.

      --
      John
    8. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with the amount of money in the Gates Foundation, $423 million is chicken feed. it's probably using several different index funds.

    9. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      ...This endowment is managed by Bill Gates Investments, which handles Gates' personal fortune. Monica Harrington, a senior policy officer at the foundation, said the investment managers had one goal: returns "that will allow for the continued funding of foundation programs and grant making." Bill and Melinda Gates require the managers to keep a highly diversified portfolio, but make no specific directives.

      This was from the article you just linked. My suspicion is that BillG doesn't really follow how the assets are managed, probably because he was distracted with a job or something. In any case, your bashing of BillG just seems to be a bit, excessive.

      the charity is just a front for tax evasion? If that's the case, why doesn't he just cash out, put his money in a big giant Scrooge McDuck-style money bin and live off of that for the rest of his life? It's not like the US is going to tax him for not making any money.

    10. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like Bill that is fine, but the Gates Foundation is doing significant good work in many areas of poverty, disease and global development.

      And Intelligent Design education. Don't forget that. $50,000/year to the president of the Discovery Institute for his work on, um, "transportation issues." Would the question of whether Jesus rode dinosaurs be a "transportation issue," I wonder?

    11. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by defaria · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking conspiracy theory idiot! I'd like to see you do any better.

    12. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The LA Times article is great! Excellent link. Everyone should read it.

      The LA Times article has two take aways for me:
      1) That the Gates Foundation does "blind-eye" investing. Meaning it is looking for maximum return with its investments.
      2) Maximum return is achieved through investing in destructive entities.

      For me, #2 is more saddening than #1. Due to #2, chances are all of us invest in destructive entities (do you know where all of your 401k funds go?).

      Should the Gates Foundation be held to a higher standard? I can't really say. I believe in looking at what they do, not what they say. The Gates Foundation message would be *much* stronger if they watched their investments, even if it cost them some longevity (but if they burned out quickly, the takeaway would be "if you don't invest in destruction, you'll lose").

      Sigh...

      To stay on topic though, I'd get Gates a T-shirt that said "I spent 33 years at Microsoft and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt", then in small print ("and $50 billion").

    13. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by dhavleak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't you think this is a little unfair?

      I mean, its obvious that most of BillG's wealth given to the foundation must have been MS stock (or some stock anyhow). Given that, the foundation will just bleed dry if they don't invest for maximum profits. And the more profitable their investments, the more impact the foundation can have.

      Now owning stock in some company that does bad/evil stuff hardly makes you the perpetrator of the crime. I mean, the company is not going to behave different with/without the investment from the foundation. It makes to difference to them who actually owns their stock (unless it's a question of controlling stakes, proxy votes etc. -- and that didn't seem to be the case in the article you linked).

      On top of that, it's really unfair when you say

      Now, he is sitting on top of one of the largest fortunes on the planet, in charge of doling out money both to the greedy companies raping the land, and to help people who are being harmed by them.

      Because again -- he did not dole out money to the company -- he has not made a loan or a gift to these companies. He's simply using the profits generated from their share price appreciation. And poetically, it goes into the people being harmed by this corporation.

      I'm not sure where you got the presidential campaign thing from. And why you're so cynical about his intentions. Have you heard his Harvard speech last year?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXCVYtYWVyU
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Q1T70VwfM
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXKrQBxJViQ
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rh9Aj7WsKE
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnHkUDxfmXE

      And have you seen the progress being made by GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization)? They have already prevented over 2.5 million children's deaths in the third world. The Gates Foundation was an active partner in creating and funding GAVI.

      When you listen to Gates talk about solving problems for people in the most wretched of conditions, you'll realize -- he's got a different and fresh perspective compared to people who have worked in this field before. He's got a lot to learn from them, but he brings unique skills to the table, and a unique problem-solving ability.

    14. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised.
      Any more details?
      Sounds like an evil bastard.

    15. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      Given that, the foundation will just bleed dry if they don't invest for maximum profits. And the more profitable their investments, the more impact the foundation can have.

      Maximum profits doesn't follow. You can easily aim to invest for 'reasonable', or 'sustainable' profit to avoid the foundation to bleed dry. There's no need to maximize. In particular, when the investments go directly against the purpose of the foundation, you would have a net negative, in that the existence of the foundation would do more harm than good.

      If that were the case, the world would be better off when Gates' fortune would be spent on gambling, hookers and blow.

    16. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by dhavleak · · Score: 1

      There's no need to maximize. In particular, when the investments go directly against the purpose of the foundation, you would have a net negative, in that the existence of the foundation would do more harm than good.

      That's exactly what I'm debating.

      For example, in the article linked by GP: at the time of writing, the foundation had somewhere between 100 million to 1 billion dollars invested in BP (one of the oil giants with 'negative' impact going against the work of the foundation).

      Now with a market cap of 220 billion dollars, the foundation's investment is somewhere between a 0.5% and 0.05% stake. In other words, they have absolutely no voice in the operation of BP. In fact, it makes absolutely no difference to BP who owns those shares -- they will continue operate exactly the same as always.

      Also note, even Gate's entire wealth would not be enough to gain a controlling stake in this company. And the point there is, his personal fortune might be the largest (or third largest) in the world -- but compared to the size of oil giants and other big companies, it pales in comparison and is not a significant bargaining chip. So the theory that he's trying to do something nefarious with his fortune using the foundation as a front basically doesn't hold water.

      Just to illustrate my point about big companies, not the market caps of the following: Exxon Mobil: $457Bn, Royal Dutch Shell: $246Bn, Mereck: $80Bn, Pfizer: $117Bn. Spread out among companies of this size, how on earth is the foundation going to have any impact in their running just by buying shares?

    17. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Read the LA times article the parent talks about please, this is indeed both very interesting and a cause for despair.

      Essentially the B&MG foundation is doing more harm than good, it seems.

    18. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I mean, its obvious that most of BillG's wealth given to the foundation must have been MS stock (or some stock anyhow). Given that, the foundation will just bleed dry if they don't invest for maximum profits. And the more profitable their investments, the more impact the foundation can have.

      Your argument can be summed up as "saving the planet is hard".

      Your argument does not in any way justify doing more damage than you are doing repair.

      Also, compare and contrast this statement with the actions of the Gates foundation: "You should thank me for performing surgery to repair your knife wound, even though I am about to shoot you in the chest." You don't help people by killing them! It's pretty fucking simple.

      Now owning stock in some company that does bad/evil stuff hardly makes you the perpetrator of the crime.

      What? YES, IT DOES.

      THIS IS WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD TODAY - YOUR LACK OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. I apologize for the super attention getting text but if you read, understand, and believe only one thing in this lifetime this should be it.

      How the fuck do you think that the "evil corporations" keep getting the money to fuck people over? It's called an IPO! Or, of course, subsequent generation and sales of stock. They don't take over with their money, there isn't enough of that. They have to use someone else's money. That someone? The shareholders. They make it possible for corporations to do evil in the same way that these poor idiot kids signing up to get their GI Bill are making it possible for a corrupt government to illegally project power all over the globe - by producing a standing army.

      Shareholders produce a standing army of cash. Your attempt to separate shareholders from responsibility is specious at best; if you are not an idiot or completely morally bankrupt then it is also disingenuous in the extreme.

      I mean, the company is not going to behave different with/without the investment from the foundation.

      Actually, that remains to be seen. One of the powers of a shareholder is to vote. Most people give up this right because without a big pile of shares, it is a waste of time. The Gates foundation can cause the company to behave more evilly by simply failing to vote against evil.

      Because again -- he did not dole out money to the company -- he has not made a loan or a gift to these companies. He's simply using the profits generated from their share price appreciation.

      I don't know if you understand that those are shares of the company. By issuing public shares, they got money. By purchasing public shares, you not only inflate the artificial value of the corporation, but you also own a piece of it. That's what shares mean, they're a share of the company. I'm talking to you like you're an idiot because you're acting like one.

      Let me make it clear to you - this company is killing people and the Gates foundation owns a piece of the company. It's really not very complicated. I don't know why you are attempting to make it so, but there is no particular reason to do so unless you will benefit in some way.

      I'm not sure where you got the presidential campaign thing from.

      It's called paying attention. Try it sometime.

      And why you're so cynical about his intentions. Have you heard his Harvard speech last year?

      No. If you can point me to a transcript I will read it - I cannot receive high-speed internet where I live (except satellite - $80/mo for 9GB/mo - fuck that) and cannot use youtube at all (not even downloading with a download manager.)

      And have you seen the progress being made by GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization)? They have already prevented over 2.5 million children's deaths in the third worl

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1
      I'm apparently debating something else, that profit maximization can be counterproductive to the goals of a foundation such as Gates'. I do think we're debating orthogonal issues, and I agree completely with your point that the Gates foundation cannot be held responsible for the full actions of the companies they have a share in. They can however be held responsible proportionally.

      So, the full responsibility of the Oil companies raid on the Nigerian population should not be ascribed to the Gates Foundation. They should however know better to support than to support such a raid by whatever small percentage they own. Buying shares is taking ownership is taking responsibility. It simply is a black spot on the foundation, the size is a matter of debate.

    20. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by dhavleak · · Score: 1

      Buying shares is taking ownership is taking responsibility. It simply is a black spot on the foundation, the size is a matter of debate.

      Agreed.

    21. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by dhavleak · · Score: 1

      Your argument does not in any way justify doing more damage than you are doing repair.

      This is the crux of the issue -- why do you say owning that stock does more damage than the good done by the foundation? After all, the good work (the actual work) is very direct, very tangible. The 'bad' is an intangible. I agree with your point about ownership of shares implying that you are a part of what the company is doing. But to support your conclusion you need to measure the 'bad' done without the foundation owning those shares, the 'bad' done with the foundation owning those shares, and then subtract the delta from the good done by the foundation.

      My argument is, the delta itself is negligible (i.e. the impact of owning those shares is negligible in terms of actions undertaken by the companies in question) -- therefore the net 'good' is almost intact or largely positive anyhow.

      In any case, if you disagree with me, I can accept that. I don't think its wrong to take a principled approach and say that ideally the foundation should not own shares like that. But calling the foundation a front inspite of the measurable positive impact it is having is definitely stretching it, and colored in a bit of good old fashioned "MS is teh sux" attitude.

      Because whatever your stance on the issue of ownership of shares, the goal of the foundation is to prevent premature deaths of children in the third world from preventable causes. In their day to day functioning they surely violate some principle or the other that somebody somewhere finds offensive. Should they worry about that, or should they continue to do work that directly goes towards saving lives instead?

    22. Re:The ability to seperate himself truely from.. by dhavleak · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you got the presidential campaign thing from.

      It's called paying attention. Try it sometime.

      I am well aware of the Bill Gates for president thing that was going on some time ago. I guess I should be more specific: where did you get the information that this was Bill Gates testing the waters?

      And why you're so cynical about his intentions. Have you heard his Harvard speech last year?

      No. If you can point me to a transcript I will read it - I cannot receive high-speed internet where I live (except satellite - $80/mo for 9GB/mo - fuck that) and cannot use youtube at all (not even downloading with a download manager.)

      Here's the speech. It's actually a really good read.

      he doesn't give a fuck about anyone. But go ahead and believe what you want to believe.

      You beleive he doesn't give a fuck about anyone. I'm taking his deeds through the foundation at face value. Don't you think you're being a bit unreasonable here? I mean, the google search for his speech took me all of 5 seconds. You seem to be so well-armed with all the negative information you can possibly find, but won't take 5 seconds to see the other side?

  14. A card by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

    A card begging him to find someone more capable to run the company then Balmer. Someone who cares about software and customers.

    1. Re:A card by choseph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A card begging him to not listen to advice given from people who use 'then' when they should use 'than'

  15. Perfect present by electricbern · · Score: 5, Funny

    An account on Slashdot. But no trolling, please.

    --
    alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
    1. Re:Perfect present by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Informative

      An account on Slashdot. But no trolling, please.

      It appears that he already has a few accounts here.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Perfect present by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 4, Funny

      But no trolling, please.

      What's the point if you can't troll?

      Shitcock!

      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  16. Obviously by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

    Ipod.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:Obviously by daveatneowindotnet · · Score: 1

      ...and a note that says "See being locked into proprietary formats suck doesn't it!"

  17. I got him a charitable donation by amliebsch · · Score: 5, Funny

    A donation has been made in his name to the Human Fund.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    1. Re:I got him a charitable donation by kiehlster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, even better, make a donation with the money you saved by not buying Vista.

    2. Re:I got him a charitable donation by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      I had to google to find out why this was moderated as funny...

      There is a real Human Fund... so the suggestion seemed quite sensible at face value.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    3. Re:I got him a charitable donation by T3Tech · · Score: 1
      Does that count for him personally or does it go against his foundation's 5% minimum?

      As of 2006, the foundation has an endowment of approximately US$34.6 billion. To maintain its status as a charitable foundation, it must donate at least 5% of its assets each year. Thus the donations from the foundation each year would amount to over US$1.5 billion at a minimum.

      Compared to ~$51 billion (as of 2007) in Microsoft revenue (which has to cover ~90k employees and other expenses), having one's own charitable foundation must be ludicrously profitable, not to mention free of many tax burdens.
      Not that I'm saying that the Gates Foundation doesn't do quite a bit of what looks like very good things despite the partnership with the Rockefeller Foundation.

      --
      Of course I didn't RTFA... why would I do that? You really are new here aren't you? Don't let my UID fool you.
  18. Oh ohh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bill Gates will ow demand that ALL charities use MS software or they will NOT get any financial aid from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. AND, you will give him ALL of your charity needs and requests or HE WILL give you less money if you go to other charities.

    Now, the Steve Jobs Charity will give you exactly what you need and desire and in a sleek looking package. BUT, you have to wear a black turtle neck when applying.

  19. Maybe a commodore amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the height of the era, with ALL the upgrades. So he can see how computing could have been. Before he killed it. :-((

    Those of you praising Gates for "building whole industries" and such nonsense are obviously too young to remember the catastrophic Extinction Event that was Microsoft's rise. History is "written by the victors", but there's plenty of us oldsters still about who remember that brilliant era of computing diversity Before the Horror of Microsoft But A Bit After the Horror of IBM.

    1. Re:Maybe a commodore amiga by tekrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Irving Gould is as responsible for the death of the Amiga as Bill Gates, maybe more so. As much as I adore my C=64, 128, Amiga 1000 and 2000 w/Toaster, Commodore never had the slightest clue as to how to market the Amiga.

      In 20/20 hindsight, it was the first true multimedia machine, and could playback video at decent framerates (the DCTV add-on was truely amazing for its time), however Commodore tried to market it as a business machine. As if they had a chance of competing with IBM for that marketshare.

      Only too little, too late did they make an inspired version, the CDTV (and later the CD32), which made the Amiga a component of a home entertainment system, (which only now are Microsoft and Apple trying to do), but, typical Commodore, they cheap'ed it to death, and then never threw any money at actually marketing it. As such, almost no one has ever heard of the thing.

      Newtek sold more Amigas than Commodore did, by rebranding it as a 'Video Toaster System', and many of those toasters are still in use today (although to be fair, many are also being offloaded on eBay).

      But to say that Bill Gates killed the Amiga is to distort history as badly as most people do when they think that Bill invented the computer. Or think that Windows is the only 'PC' there is.

      (God, to think that I'm actually defending Bill Gates, a person I'd like to have shot out of a canon more than any other individual in history....) Look what you've done to me, damn you!!!

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    2. Re:Maybe a commodore amiga by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gates didn't kill the Amiga. Commodore did.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Maybe a commodore amiga by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

      Yep, commodore didn't need any help running itself into the ground, between Irving Gould and the caustic atmosphere created by Jack Tramiel that was not sustainable past the initial success of the C=64.

      I owned and used heavily every single model of Amiga released to the united states, and wound up in the effects industry as a result. The amount of stuff that was possible on that machine compared to all others at the time was astounding. Thank you Jay Miner and also Newtek.

      Anyway, despite the numerous failings of Microsoft Products, you can't argue with success. Success in this case came with a huge compromise to quality, but later OSs such as Win2k and WinXP were actually quite stable and usable, warts and all. Sure, there were many better and much more pure OS's out there (I would like to have seen BEOS take off, especially in combination with the BEOS hardware) but the chicken and egg problem came into play...users say great platform but where's the software? Software developers: We'll port our software when people adopt the platform. In a mature industry it's hard to overcome inertia. If the Amiga had been handled correctly in 1986, it had the chance to be a serious contender.

      But things are the way they are and life goes on. At least we have moore's law in processor speed to make up for the horrendous inefficiencies and bloat in Microsoft's OSs. Lets hope their next OS takes a different direction than Vista, by defaulting to a light footprint unless you want to add to it.

    4. Re:Maybe a commodore amiga by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      Where I work, our office manager is a lady who worked for Commodore (corp. ladder, from what I understand) during the "Golden Era"; she maintains that their downfall was due to their management & co. blowing cash and treating it like they had a never ending supply. Go-go 80's and all that, I guess. I was attending preschool in 89, so I wouldn't know.

      Although, I did love my C64 (and VIC20!), and BASIC was my first exposure to programming at age 8 or so. So, the software development major is grateful for the exposure, and bitter that BASIC brain damaged me for life. It took several years to unlearn all the crap BASIC taught me, other than curiosity and problem solving. I still miss typing "load,8,1" and starting up the tape drive.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  20. the #1 portable media player on the planet.. by justindarc · · Score: 2, Funny

    a Zune!!

    1. Re:the #1 portable media player on the planet.. by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Odd, looking at the brown Zune I could have sworn it was a number two.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  21. PC wants a Mac by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

    ... judging from all those commercials in which he appears.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  22. What a silly question by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    A UNIX manual, of course!

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:What a silly question by Alcoholic+Synonymous · · Score: 3, Informative

      A UNIX manual, of course!

      Microsoft already knows UNIX. They were responsible for the most widely used variant of the 80s. They sold it off to be rebranded as SCO UNIX when they shifted focus to Windows NT.

      Let me give you a bit of history:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix

    2. Re:What a silly question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has used BSD code in their operating systems for years. Look at telnet or ftp in a binary editor. Apparently they couldn't write the code themselves, so they "borrowed" from someone who could.

  23. Possible Retirement Gifts by Eberlin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. A gaming rig so he can keep pwning n00bs.
    2. an iPhone, a mac, and an iTunes account.
    3. some GOOG stock 'cause you gotta take care of that 401K SPECIALLY after retirement.
    4. A seat in the OLPC project's board of dudes that make decisions...it's only a matter of time.
    5. Ubuntu...and by that I mean "humanity to others" -- actually, a wish of good luck as he concentrates more in philantrophy. As much as I (and c'mon, I can't be alone here) enjoy Microsoft bashing, I think the Gates foundation could (continue to) actually do a lot of good.
    1. Re:Possible Retirement Gifts by Locutus · · Score: 2, Informative

      # Ubuntu...and by that I mean "humanity to others" -- actually, a wish of good luck as he concentrates more in philantrophy. As much as I (and c'mon, I can't be alone here) enjoy Microsoft bashing, I think the Gates foundation could (continue to) actually do a lot of good.

      One problem here, his foundation does not stick to healthcare issues. That's right, they spread alot of Microsoft software around and from what I've heard, you get those Microsoft software deals as long as you agree to reject open source software. So Bill is not going to be spending more time helping the world, he's just moving to spread Microsoft Windows and MS Office to more children. You know, like a crack dealer looking for future revenue except the crack dealer isn't preventing customers from getting their fix from another dealer.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    2. Re:Possible Retirement Gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understood. I work at a place that got a grant from the B&M Foundation. Supplied the place with NT-based machines, MS Office, and a few Edutainment titles. Started the place up to be able to train the general public in using a computer (Windows, of course) and the basics of MS Office.

      Yes, technically it was free advertising. People who wanted to buy their own computers were looking for Windows and Office, sometimes cringing at the price.

      Worse yet, as NT support disappeared, and the list of spyware, viruses, etc. made the machines incredibly unstable while at the same time, the demand for computer use kept rising, an understaffed IT department struggled to manage the machines.

      The place eventually needed to get grants and raise other funds to replace the machines. And yes, they run windows. I wish they didn't -- I wish they kept the old machines, slapped Ubuntu on them and ran OO.org, which probably would've been as stable, more responsive, and "cheaper" -- but hey, that's not my call.

      So yes, I know the whole "The first one is always free" thing all too well. I'm not calling for sainthood. Just saying, along the way, maybe a bit more good may happen since he's devoting his time to the foundation. When the novelty of him leaving MS full-time wears off, I'll go back to bashing on Gates, etc. like a good slashbot.

    3. Re:Possible Retirement Gifts by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't hurt to send him a cake...

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    4. Re:Possible Retirement Gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An invitation to come help Ubuntu become everything he wishes Windows could be for the end user.

    5. Re:Possible Retirement Gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldnt hurt, he has managed to direct M$ into a behemoth... worst he could do is help direct ubuntu into an a competing behemoth... though id prefer the root distro to ubuntu...debian

  24. A nice book to read by kwabbles · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
  25. A nickel... by wandazulu · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:A nickel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :P

  26. bollocks of the first order, what you are saying. by unity100 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    sir.

    at the time while he was even contemplating starting this world of information technology, there was already computers, networking, emailing, operating systems (hint hint) and many more.

    he just have been a successful (thats also questionable in many ways, if you get the backing from big boys like him, theres high chance that you can succeed too) entrepreneur, and if he wasnt there, today you'd be saying that about someone else.

  27. Gift Card by PawNtheSandman · · Score: 4, Funny

    $25 gift card to Applebees.

    1. Re:Gift Card by kmsigel · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure why, but this is the funniest idea yet. The cheapness of it. The thought of Gates in Applebees. The thought of him using a gift card. It just works all around. :)

    2. Re:Gift Card by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Eatin' Gooooooood in the Neeiiiiighborhooooooood.

    3. Re:Gift Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $25 gift card to Applebees.

      you really must not like him...

    4. Re:Gift Card by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      Me, I'd have gotten him a gift card to Tsotchke's. Or Flingers.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  28. A Gift Basket by AioKits · · Score: 1

    Containing orange (or green) flip-flops, bermuda shorts, a shirt with either pineapples or tropical fish on it, some cheap sunglasses, a straw hat, some sun-screen nose rub (preferably blue) and a can of macadamia nuts.

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  29. So long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and thanks for all the bloat.

  30. What about... by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...a stuffed toy penguin with a badge reading "Don't fear me"?

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    1. Re:What about... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Better yet: a 30 foot tall armour plated robot penguin that launches high explosive packed herrings while shrieking "DON'T FEAR ME!!!!" through a 10,000 watt speaker system, programmed to seek and destroy.

      Seems fair...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  31. Credit where credit is due by Crane+Style · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would get him a big hug. Without Gates, my parents and grandparents wouldn't be using computers for email today. It'd be a lot harder to live across the country where the fun jobs are without that...... I guess they might be using computers, but at least now they have an OS with built in sound drivers that work ;)

    1. Re:Credit where credit is due by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. that's a lame-ass comment.

      OS/2, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, BeOS... these ALL have built-in sound drivers that work.

      Windows XP has problems on many Dell laptops.. where the sound drivers are "forgotten" by the OS after a reboot and no longer work.

      Windows Vista has a lot of hardware that just won't work with it at all.

      And.. without Gates.. your parents and grandparents would probably be using Linux or OS/2.. either of which is more stable and more secure than Windows.

    2. Re:Credit where credit is due by Crane+Style · · Score: 1

      Wow.. that's a lame-ass comment.

      OS/2, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, BeOS... these ALL have built-in sound drivers that work.

      Windows XP has problems on many Dell laptops.. where the sound drivers are "forgotten" by the OS after a reboot and no longer work.

      Windows Vista has a lot of hardware that just won't work with it at all.

      And.. without Gates.. your parents and grandparents would probably be using Linux or OS/2.. either of which is more stable and more secure than Windows.

      I'm glad my parents don't have Linux. It's hard enough to teach them how to resize a photo from their digital camera let alone recompile their video drivers because of a kernel upgrade.
      Full Disclosure: I realize not everyone loves Gentoo like I do.

      Secondly, less targeted != more secure.

      Remember when Apple used to claim things were more secure? They gained more of a market share, and you don't hear much of that any more do you? Back in the day when I had to maintain windows and linux servers side by side (not my choice) without any boundary protection, the Linux one was smacked more often and faster than the Win2k boxes. Anecdotal I know, but relevant nonetheless.

    3. Re:Credit where credit is due by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...at least now they have an OS with built in sound drivers that work ;)

      Not on my 64-bit Acer Aspire. Windows: No 64-bit sound drivers, and no way to get any. 64-bit Linux: Sound works great, out of the box (openSUSE and Ubuntu).

      And while we're at it, how about wifi? No 64-bit Windows drivers, and no way to get any. Linux: MadWifi.

      Whoever modded parent Insightful is on crack.

    4. Re:Credit where credit is due by HappySmileMan · · Score: 0

      And I thank Linux that I can sit here listening to Radiohead, Windows XP doesn't work with my sound card, not even when I downloaded the official drivers from the manufacturer. Linux works OOTB

    5. Re:Credit where credit is due by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad my parents don't have Linux. It's hard enough to teach them how to resize a photo from their digital camera let alone recompile their video drivers because of a kernel upgrade.

      I've been using Linux as my full-time desktop OS for nearly 4 years. Number of times I've had to recompile a driver due to kernel updates: 0.

      I realize not everyone loves Gentoo like I do.

      And there's absolutely no reason for your grandparents to use Gentoo when there's "don't have to worry about what goes on under the hood if you don't want to" distros like Ubuntu and Linspire around.

      Secondly, less targeted != more secure...

      Wait for it...

      ...when I had to maintain windows and linux servers side by side (not my choice) without any boundary protection, the Linux one was smacked more often and faster than the Win2k boxes. Anecdotal I know, but relevant nonetheless.

      Uh-huh. So which is it again? More targeted or less targeted?

      Do you even actually use Linux?

    6. Re:Credit where credit is due by Crane+Style · · Score: 1

      .... Linux works OOTB

      As long as you don't want to use it on a laptop.

    7. Re:Credit where credit is due by Crane+Style · · Score: 1

      1) Well, I guess as long as those security updates posted by Ubuntu apply automatically they could use the Linux version of Windows.

      2) The Linux box was targeted less frequently, but the damage incurred was far greater. The Windows box was targeted ALL the time, but not with a high success ratio.

      3) If you count several servers, workstations running several flavors of Linux, then yes I actually use it. If in order to qualify as actually using it, life use it as a full time desktop OS, then no I don't use it. I'm one of the few that are bright enough to realize that both MS and Linux have their place, and it's ok to use them both for their strengths. Fan boys don't have that luxury.

    8. Re:Credit where credit is due by Crane+Style · · Score: 1

      Not on my 64-bit Acer Aspire. Windows: No 64-bit sound drivers, and no way to get any. 64-bit Linux: Sound works great, out of the box (openSUSE and Ubuntu).

      And while we're at it, how about wifi? No 64-bit Windows drivers, and no way to get any. Linux: MadWifi.

      Whoever modded parent Insightful is on crack.

      Lucky for my grandparents, every piece of hardware that I've run into without native 64 bit drivers have wrappers just like Linux. I guess you just need to know how to find them. (sounds just like Linux)

    9. Re:Credit where credit is due by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

      Works OOTB on my laptop upstairs (a Dell). Same with my brother's laptop (not sure what make). Both are running Kubuntu. Of course Windows doesn't have problems on either of those either, as long as I go and download the drivers, maybe I'm just lucky.

    10. Re:Credit where credit is due by Crane+Style · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you can send me the Powerball numbers :)

  32. I know! by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    I would buy him the rare opportunity to treat me to dinner. I'm freaking hungry. It's not like I could ever get him anything he couldn't or hasn't got for himself.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  33. The *real* question is... by information_retrieva · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...did security walk him to the door after his exit interview?

    1. Re:The *real* question is... by LordEd · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news, a printer was found in an empty field. The printer was severely damaged and was broken into many small pieces. No witnesses have come forward to provide clues to the incident.

  34. Leaving party by rishistar · · Score: 2, Funny

    A Belgian anarchist style party....complete with custard pies!

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    1. Re:Leaving party by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Why not show the video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=CHc8qIR_e9I

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  35. Re:Nothing by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative

    Steve Ballmer has been CEO since January 2000.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Thank you Bill by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    Not matter what people want to think thanks to Microsoft products I've been able to find work since 1982 from development to IT. I also admire that you are one of the only mega rich who donates to charity out of your own pocket, not your companies and take credit for it. Enjoy the next phase of your life.

  38. What I really want to know is... by wandazulu · · Score: 2

    ...who helped him carry his boxes to the car. Steve? Ray?

  39. Re:Nothing by milgr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    He's the Chairman. Balmer is the CEO.

    --
    Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
  40. Bill Gates last day video by Aaron+England · · Score: 4, Informative

    Obligatory video from CES 2008 for those who haven't seen it. Here's to you Big Bill. Thank you for your sense of humor and your charity. And thank you for inspiring so many including myself to pursue a career in computers and technology.

  41. Re:bollocks of the first order, what you are sayin by freemywrld · · Score: 1

    Oh, and get off his lawn!

  42. Gates lovefest by corbettw · · Score: 1, Funny

    Reading through the comments so far, it seems like /. is the middle of a lovefest for their one-time enemy, Bill Gatus of Borg. Come on, where are the FOSS zealots who will scream and yell and rave about what an evil person he is? Someone restore my faith in geekdom!

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:Gates lovefest by T3Tech · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yay! Now M$ will go down in flames without the evil Gates behind them. bwuhahahaha!

      Or something like that. :)

      --
      Of course I didn't RTFA... why would I do that? You really are new here aren't you? Don't let my UID fool you.
  43. What a lame charity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why Bill picked this charity of all things..

    As a nerd, you would think he would fund a Mars mission or something right? Thats what I would do (aside from making the next great pyramid tomb)

    1. Re:What a lame charity by sexconker · · Score: 1

      A manned mission to Mars would cost quite an order of magnitude more than Bill Gates / MS has.

  44. Windoze ME by joesucks · · Score: 1, Funny

    windows ME ... it was absolutely the best piece of software ever written!

  45. vacuums are filled by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Without him, I am not sure that personal technology would have taken off,

    No. Chances are that we'd simply have a different guy filling his shoes, or a different company filling Microsoft's.

    For example, maybe we'd all be using Sun computers...

    1. Re:vacuums are filled by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Gates was there. Paterson was too, and so was Kildall. However, neither had the hunger Gates had, and in business it's that hunger that matters most in the end. Could Stallman have filled the gap eventually? Maybe, but he became an activist, and arguably Torvalds is a bigger figure despite the dependency on GNU Linux has had.

  46. How about ... by hurfy · · Score: 1

    a nice shiny new PS3 to play with :)

    (2nd choice was window blinds.....)

  47. Reading top comments... by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Funny

    I blatantly do not have any awe or gratitude to that person expressed in top comments.

    My work is entirely related to computers and without PC it would be more productive, because I would not spend so much time socializing, playing games, watching news, playing with novelties, feeling up needless forms and documents.

    Restriction is good, freedom is bad. At least for me.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Reading top comments... by martinw89 · · Score: 1

      Certainly the freedom to feel up forms and documents is a bad thing (or is it??)

    2. Re:Reading top comments... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      The post was t'n'c of course, too bad mods did not appreciate the humor.

      But in every joke there is only a part of a joke

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    3. Re:Reading top comments... by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      It was not Troll. Someone with mod points didn't take his Rapamycin it seems.

      http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/27/1210202

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
  48. My Son's Zune, since it stopped working 3 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after we bought it.

  49. I'd buy him.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A copy of Twilight In The Desert.

    It's time Mr. Gates learned about Peak Oil.

    1. Re:I'd buy him.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seconded.

  50. obviously by redcaboodle · · Score: 0

    A time machine and a contraceptive.

    --
    -- Put crudely, the world is an extremely large problem instance. (Russel/Norvig Artificial Intelligence)
  51. In other news... by Prisoner's+Dilemma · · Score: 1

    Apple releases improved UI which was actually developed several years before. When asked why they were waiting they replied, "We felt it would be safer not to release it until now"

  52. Altair 8800 by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Paul Allen should show up with Micro-Soft Basic 2.0 for Altair 8800.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  53. Re:bollocks of the first order, what you are sayin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That means... if Ugh hadn't discovered fire, we would NOT live in the dark now?

  54. Slightly off-topic but somewhat related by Zwicky · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the BBC documentary How a Geek Changed the World, did anyone see the part where Gates leaped over a chair from a standing start? That must have been a very useful skill when working alongside Ballmer!

    (I've been unable to find the clip online so I can't post a link.)

    --
    "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
  55. What would I buy him as a retirement gift? by Horar · · Score: 1

    A soul.

    Oh wait, isn't that what the charity is for?

  56. movie scrip: Demolition Man: Walk of Chief Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'ld say they give him a Windows Vista box, and walk him into a Linux convention. His mission: install Vista and exit the "Scorched Earth" without mishap. From many Walks before him, they've mostly been "boohed" out of the area or sacked by an army of punch-llamas. Will he be sacked before he even gets the tape off the lid or, maybe depending if he decides to call the telephone activator first, to be noticed on the phone trying to save time before opening for the actual install? :-\

  57. Open Source Software! by Shade+of+Pyrrhus · · Score: 1

    Why buy when you can give the gift of open source software!

  58. A solid gold Clippy...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    packed with C4.

    Just kidding about the C4.

    I would actually shake his hand.

    Love or hate Microsoft / Windows, he has done a lot to get people using computers.

    For those of you whippersnappers that don't remember Clippy:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clippy

  59. No one can give him present! by Netino · · Score: 0

    "What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"

    The *world* no one can give him.
    If you give him the planet, he will ask the universe!

  60. Gift idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would buy him a Xerox 820 with dual 8" floppies running a copy of CP/M, Wordstar, and DB2.

    What do you get a billionaire who has "everything"?

  61. My gift by Mathness · · Score: 1

    What would you buy him as a retirement gift?

    I don't know him, but I think he could see the humour in this. I would give him a plush penguin holding a card with the words "Free, is when you break away from Microsoft". :p

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
    1. Re:My gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not really funny, so I don't think he could find any humor in it.

  62. retirement gift by nurb432 · · Score: 1, Funny

    A 5 pound brick of C4.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  63. A copy of ubuntu... by qzjul · · Score: 1

    ...with a receipt for $0 in the box :)

  64. doze by Venture37 · · Score: 1

    a Mac

  65. Re:A good swift kick in the bollox! by Locutus · · Score: 1

    (There is still IBM code in Windows.. it's called OLE.. Object Linking and Embedding.. M$ licenses it from Big Blue... Big Blue's follow-up to OLE, called SOM .. System Object Modeling.. is far superior.. but you don't get to use it because you don't run OS/2, and it was never developed for other platforms.)

    IIRC, IBM owned DDE and Wang owned OLE or something like that. Wang took Microsoft to court and got a few million from them before the lights were turned off.

    And SOM was ported to both Windows and Mac but Microsoft vaporware, licensing restrictions on OEMs, and Apples need to be tied to the hardware( PPC, PREP / CHRP ) all helped block SOM from getting spread outside of OS/2 on the PC.

    He sure as hell doesn't deserve to be praised.

    But any good snakeoil salesman is mostly praised
    at first. It's only through education and understanding of the product that they are then scoffed at. Too bad our society is mostly computer illiterate and their understanding of computer use comes down to knowing what buttons to click. The others who praise him and his company are able to make great wealth constantly repairing the failures of Microsoft's products.

    One thing is for sure, this the snakeoil salesman is not retiring is trade and will be pushing Microsoft software for a long time to come. Unfortunate for everyone IMO.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  66. Good-bye Gates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft's days are numbered. Gates is getting out while he still can.

  67. I would. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would get him the latest Ubuntu Distro :)
    Wouldn't cost me a dime,
    but it would blow his mind

  68. Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A Mac

  69. Re: Meme by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1


    Two copies of Windows Me side by side form a meme for the Me Me Generation.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  70. Avitar.. by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    Guess now we'll have to replace the Bill Gates Borg avitar with Steve Balmer throwing a chair.

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  71. we wouldnt by unity100 · · Score: 1

    because if ugh didnt do it, magh would do it.but your analogy doesnt hold in that, when ugh discovered fire, there werent a group of 'businessmen' choosing to support ugh over magh. in the case at hand, there was.

  72. Parting gift? by chaosmind · · Score: 2, Funny

    > "What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"

    That's easy: "Open Source for Dummies"

  73. An Open Letter to Hobbyists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine who I worked with for a number of years was the one who "acquired" a certain paper tape (and started copying it) from Bill's RV during a demo of their BASIC for the Altiar down in New Mexico many years ago. Their copying and distribution prompted the (in)famous Open Letter to Hobbyists.

    That "missing" paper tape reel would make a nice gift, methinks.

  74. just for the record... by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    Freaks of Bill_Gates (1523)
    Info Journal Firehose Friends Fans Foes Freaks Tags Bookmarks Friends of Friends

    Bill_Gates (1523) is hated by no one

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:just for the record... by againjj · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bill_Gates (1523) is hated by no one

      That settles it, he isn't the real one!

  75. A spot on by misterhypno · · Score: 1

    America's Got Talent.

    He does the BEST "Harlan Ellison, ranting" impersonation that I have EVER seen!

    He would win, for sure!

  76. I'd really enjoy the look on his face if he were.. by zullnero · · Score: 1

    presented with a wig comprised of all of Ballmer's remaining hair, a bottle of Christian Brothers brandy, and a shotgun that jams frequently. They could call it the "Windows ME Treatment"

  77. Moviemaker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would get him Movie Maker..... now if I could only figure out where to download it from.

  78. He should have had them lay him off by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    I know someone who works on the government side of Unemployment Insurance. Supposedly with the stimulus package's "extended benefits", there's either no work-search required, or it's not gonna be enforced.

    He could have gotten a few extra dollars to make the first few months of his retirement less of a financial struggle.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  79. Found video link. by Zwicky · · Score: 1

    Replying to myself here, but I found the clip the BBC used. That is one quintessentially geeky jump.

    Really getting off-topic now, but at 3:14 in this, where is Mitch giving his interview from? The 1970s?!

    --
    "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
  80. sidewinder by ezwip · · Score: 1

    I'd buy Bill a racing game and an old skewl microsoft sidewinder gamepad which no driver on the face of the earth can run.

    --
    "I guess I'm gonna fade into Bolivian."
    1. Re:sidewinder by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I have the old school boomerang sidewinder gamepad. It's excellent and works perfectly under Linux!

    2. Re:sidewinder by ezwip · · Score: 1

      I know it's funny as hell. I forgot to add that he'd have to run nix to use it. :)

      --
      "I guess I'm gonna fade into Bolivian."
  81. OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    replying to your sig:

    if japan made sex robots they would look like a 20-hosed shop vac and would rape you as soon as you walked into the room

    1. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's only rape if you're unwilling ;)

  82. Obligatory Mac reply by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Hear me out, because this is serious and not intended as flamebait.

    I'd get him a 20" Intel-based Apple iMac computer installed with the last version of Office (not the newest one, but one before). That way, Bill could at least see that a decent-spec'd, moderately priced yet still well-designed computer CAN actually be a pleasant experience for the overwhelming majority of normal computer users. Maybe then Bill can realize that sometimes less is more and that a long laundry list of half-assed features is no good compared to a shorter list of features that work well.

    1. Re:Obligatory Mac reply by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      that a decent-spec'd, moderately priced yet still well-designed computer

      Prices of regular PCs have gone down, while Macs stayed at the same price. My widescreen HP laptop which has a slower processor (only downside), 512MB dedicated graphic card RAM, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5450 @ 1.66GHz, nVidia Corporation GeForce 8400M GS (rev a1) (with HDMI, VGA outputs) , sdcard reader/writer, wireless, lan nic, modem cost me the same price as the cheapest Mac Mini £399.

      Sorry, I don't think that Macs are "moderately priced" and considering how the graphics on the Mac Mini, macbook, imac etc. don't have real dedicated RAM (they use shared memory - Mac Pro and Macbookpro don't)... I don't agree with the "well-designed" comment either.

      Maybe then Bill can realize that sometimes less is more and that a long laundry list of half-assed features is no good compared to a shorter list of features that work well.

      I don't think you know Bill that well.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Obligatory Mac reply by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with anyone who thinks a MacBook or an entry level iMac are somehow expensive. Compared to similar models, or compared to higher priced models ability to barely do more, anyone who thinks iMacs/MacBooks are NOT moderately priced are just cheap. The point I'm making is an incredibly rewarding user experience doesn't have to cost a small fortune. Apple gets it, Dell doesn't. With Dell you have either bottom-dollar crap, or insanely expensive nice machines. Where's the middle ground? Better yet, the middle ground is there, but why does it suck so greatly compared to Apple's middle ground?

    3. Re:Obligatory Mac reply by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with anyone who thinks a MacBook or an entry level iMac are somehow expensive.

      Compared to what I can get for the same prices as a laptop else where, be it HP, Asus, Acer etc. I do. (My laptop is not entry level by the way)

      anyone who thinks iMacs/MacBooks are NOT moderately priced are just cheap.

      It's not that I am cheap, it's just that, if I have to invest more money, I will go buy better hardware than what Apple can provide me for that price.

      The point I'm making is an incredibly rewarding user experience doesn't have to cost a small fortune.

      I guess if we're talking about the cost of getting the Apple experience instead of powerful hardware for the price, then, yes, I agree with you that it isn't that expensive.

      Apple gets it, Dell doesn't.

      Hence why I buy from other OEMs, I don't know why most people in the States (observation) seem to believe that Dell is one of the only choices.

      Better yet, the middle ground is there, but why does it suck so greatly compared to Apple's middle ground?

      Because Dell have great business and this formula gives them the optimal profit. Dell has very loyal followers since there are plenty of people who don't know of anything but Dell.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  83. A nice T-Shirt by SpicyLemon · · Score: 2, Funny

    A nice BSOD T-Shirt. Possibly even a new scanner to go with it.

    --
    This post approved by Shampoo.
  84. 1MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should make it a whole Megabyte. The experience is much more exciting with emm386.sys, even if not particularly more useful.

  85. Oh, perfect idea by ryty · · Score: 1

    A stuffed Linux penguin.

    --
    if you were me, you'd think the same way
  86. Charitable by alfino · · Score: 1

    All I can say is watch what this guy is up to "charitable" in the future. I'd rather he didn't.

    --
    echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
  87. iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I would buy him an iPhone

  88. Penicillin. by dos4who · · Score: 1

    ...for the man who has everything... ~m

    --
    "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
  89. Wonder if he has enough money to retire.

  90. Gift, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    btw I'm german...

  91. a broomstick up the a$$ by waldo2020 · · Score: 1

    rammed an inch for every farking year I've had to live with his garbage operating systems!

  92. I'd get him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...an invoice for $10mil, for all the headaches he's caused me.

  93. Bill, I beg of you! by Hackerlish · · Score: 1

    Fire the Vista guys on the way out. Reinstate XP, and we'll overlook this little racketeering monopoly thing. Ok?

  94. I'd give him: by wozzinator · · Score: 1

    A burning brown bag filled with fecal matter.

    --
    BSD is for people who love Unix, Linux is for people who hate Microsoft.
  95. perfect gift by Device666 · · Score: 1

    I fine retirement gift would be the latest Apple hardware and a million of Apple shares. "You will be assimilated, resistance is futile."

  96. Gates wasn't that bad by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    I think most of MS' issues come from his underlings. I foresee MS going down the shitter faster than it would have with him on board which, imo, is a good thing.

    As a retirement gift, I'd give him a decent set of clothes. He needs that more than anything else I could possibly give him.

  97. And Old Man Agrees by iconic999 · · Score: 0

    As a 50 year old geezer, who has "been with M$ since the beginning", I would have to agree 100%.

  98. Phoenixjim by phoenixjim · · Score: 1

    How about... a Conscience? At least that way, he could Properly enjoy his retirement.

  99. lifetime support for Windows XP by Device666 · · Score: 1

    The perfect gift from Microsoft to give to Bill Gates would be lifetime support for Windows XP, including the exclusive service packs 4 and higher, custom built for Bill Gates alone. And a DVD with some highlights of Microsoft, titled:"Developers, Developers, Developers" which includes the famous commercial for windows 1.0 starring Steve Balmer.

  100. Slashdot needs a new microsoft logo? by kwrxxx · · Score: 0

    I wonder if Slashdot will change the bOrg Gates to something different?

  101. Oh, easy to shop for on this one. by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    What would you buy him as a retirement gift?

    Swift Kick: Apply directly to the nutsack.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  102. A welcome gift from slashdot would be... by walbourn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    retiring the stupid BillG as The Borg icon! ST:TNG has been in reruns since 1994, there isn't a Star Trek show in production, he hasn't been involved in the daily running of MSFT for years, and as of today he isn't even an employee.

    I'm not suggesting that anyone in the /. community consider updating their perceptions of the company for the last 10 years; to acknowledge that anyone who has gone to work for the company since 2000 has had any influence on the company's approach to business, markets, customers, or technology; or to suggest that the investment in software engineering practices, security tools and training, developer outreach, or a monstrous R&D spend could have any value what-so-ever to the PC industry, the software industry, or have improved any MSFT product. It does seem, however, like today would be a good day to update the thumbnail to something that at least reflects the cultural constructs of the 21st century.

  103. Typical Last Day? by ewhac · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Did he have his badge confiscated and get escorted to the door by security?

    Schwab

  104. CBC has an article by kbahey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The CBC has an article titled Bill Gates in Canada: a checkered legacy.

    There are some choice quotes on anti-trust, Michael Cowpland (Corel founder and the WordPerfect debacle), recruiting from University of Waterloo, establishing a Richmond, B.C. campus, ...etc.

    Worth a read.

  105. jc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the one time richest man

    he was rated the richest man in the world 13 times in a row according to the BBC network

  106. messier31 by messier31 · · Score: 1

    A Macbook Pro, with Microsoft Office, Leopard, and Vista all on it, plus other software.

  107. Gates Clown Head To Broadcast 24/7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark my words, in my opinion: this is the beginning of Gates' clown head activation. Now he will never shut up until he has secured some important spot on the national or worldwide stage. He has money and fame, now he wants power. Most people assume he is gone and done with Microsoft, not so, not even in his own words if you ever care to follow what the man says in interviews. He will continue to play a role at Microsoft, and perhaps an even more sinister one as he will be thought of by most as out of the picture. He will appear distant from Microsoft to most, but he will now play the goodie-two-shoes of the world and meanwhile the clown head Gates will bark his opinion on whatever, whenever.

    Here's what Gates thinks about healthcare, here's what Gates thinks about the middle east, here's what Gates thinks about midgets sodomizing each other for Jesus. It begins now, don't think for a moment this guy will be content enough to do "good works" for the sake of humanity, don't ever be fooled by this man again.

    And because he's rich, most people undulate before him in admiration, like the poor father in the movie Arthur, who had a stiffy for the rich drunk he daughter was fucking.

  108. Its funny how.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its funny how gates probably devoted an entire millisecond thinking about slashdot and the fossie zealots that live here, but to any lay person, the commenters on this otherwise benign looking news aggregator seem to be excessively obsessed with gates and his little company.

    So while gates continued making shrewd business decisions and generating billions of dollars for several decades, all the people here continued to do is bitch and moan, whilst keeping up with the newest 'net memes, ofcource. I wonder if thats a sign of true helplessness or stupidity.

    I guess I'll just hang around while the charming people here mod me down. Well in a couple of years, when the last of the moderates who didn't drink the koolaid on either side of the windows/linux pissing contest, leave this place, it will truly be a joy to read.

    1. Re:Its funny how.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's ISO OOXML campaign involved Bill Gates making personal phone calls to all kinds of nations. The stain of OOXML is on him.

    2. Re:Its funny how.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thanks for including a citation for that. Making allegations of phone calls is one thing, proving what was talked about is another.

      In any case, like it or not, Word documents, PowerPoint presentations are already industry standards. Whats ironic is that products such as openoffice are riding on the success of microsoft's own office formats. Can you realistically imagine anyone using openoffice if it only worked with OSS formats? Sure some people would, but the vast majority would ignore it.

    3. Re:Its funny how.. by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      Thanks for including a citation for that. Making allegations of phone calls is one thing, proving what was talked about is another.

      In any case, like it or not, Word documents, PowerPoint presentations are already industry standards. Whats ironic is that products such as openoffice are riding on the success of microsoft's own office formats. Can you realistically imagine anyone using openoffice if it only worked with OSS formats? Sure some people would, but the vast majority would ignore it.



      ...the funny thing is, MS doc formats continue to change in matters obscure to me ( I am not a geek, I am in finance) ; seen from the outside, MS is frantically keeping his format incompatible with the others, because (give or take) the last two consumer products that worked "AS PRODUCTS" are Excel 4.0 and Winword 2.0.
      I know that to imply that Bill himself called a swathe of national authorities to bully them in the open doc format charade is too much, but to imply that a boatload of developers decided on their own to push a native new doc format with every new version of Excel and Word is ludicrous. Unless he personally used only open office, of course!!

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
  109. Maybe a copy of Linux? by fairfaux · · Score: 1

    I don't have anything near as much money as him, I would consider a copy of Linux, because the O/S and software are written so much better than anything he or his company has ever come up with. I did note that it seemed a rather canned interview, it looked like it was held on the Microsoft campus, Billy-boy seemed perfectly calm, Brian Williams seemed nervous. I was rather insulted by this advertisement by NBC News (or was that MSNBC?), especially as there was never one mention of Open Source, the only non-MS operating system mentioned was Apple, and Billy-boy only had to say that his company had written a lot of software for that O/S.

  110. No more time share by theurge14 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think he at least deserves an unlimited login session on a PDP-10.

  111. Microsoft Bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft Bob

  112. BILL GATES FINGER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  113. Gates? Bullied by Ballmer? Sh-yeah, right. by jamrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of what people really dislike about Microsoft is Ballmer's doing, Gates just didn't have the spine to stand up to him and reel him in.

    Really? I've heard many anecdotes about Bill Gates, but none about him kowtowing to anyone. In the Time magazine cover story on him some years ago, his father talks about Bill, known as "Trey" in his family, butting heads with his late mother (by all accounts an extremely strong-willed woman) when he was a young teenager, and refusing to give a millimeter. There are also many anecdotes about his own pig-headedness, and numerous variations of something he usually told people with whom found himself working: "I think you'll find we'll get along better once you realize that I'm in charge", or words to that effect. He was notorious for bullying subordinates in meetings, launching long tirades at them at perceived faults, but especially if he thought that they were bullshitting him. Microsoft insiders talk about the culture of paranoia he cultivated inside the company, forcing project managers to compete for his attention in an almost Darwinian struggle, and *EVERYTHING* that Microsoft did as a company, including their most egregious anticompetitive behavior, was either his initiative, or had his explicit approval. Ballmer was only his hatchet man, the loud-mouth bully stalking the corridors, threatening at the top of his lungs to fire everyone if a project didn't ship on time.

    Gates may look like the stereotypical nerd, but his is very much a Type A personality, quite similar to Ballmer. Don't believe for a moment that Gates was some kind of dewy-eyed innocent who didn't know what was going on inside Microsoft, or that big, bad Ballmer could tell him what to do, much less bully him. From what I understand, friction between them only arose because Gates insisted on trying to dictate to Ballmer even after he was named CEO, and Ballmer naturally felt that since it was his call, he'd do things his way. Believe me, I don't think there's the person born yet who could bully him. Well, maybe Melinda, but that's the prerogative of wives everywhere.

    1. Re:Gates? Bullied by Ballmer? Sh-yeah, right. by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      ... something he usually told people with whom found himself working: "I think you'll find we'll get along better once you realize that I'm in charge", or words to that effect.

      I replied, "That's cool, Bill. You be in charge, and I'll be right. Sorted."

      Well, it never happened, but given the opportunity ;-)

      (OT, but that "This comment will not be saved until you click the Submit button below" message? Isn't that indicative of this being the antithesis of a good user interface, in that it doesn't do what you might expect, but instead has to add explanations of how it works into the flow of the user experience? Sort of like the garbage one expects from a Microsoft product? It's been a while since I've actually posted here, but I hadn't expected them to have cocked things up this badly. It's the kind of UI failure that I advise clients against.)

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  114. Goodbye Bill. Do good things with your money. by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll admit to my share of Microsoft bashing over the years. Bill has always been a great boogey man! My hats off to Bill Gates for being the arch-nemesis master . He's kind of like the guy who played Darth Vader. You hated him but,.... you cared about his character. He was meaningful. It's going to be sad to see Bill fading away. Ballmer is kind of like a laughable sidekick. You can imagine him dancing around like monkey-boy while Bill is plotting --like Mojo Jojo-- to take over the world. I think that the "Gates of Borg" icon from Slashdot will live forever. So, goodbye Bill. Go do good things with the remaining time you have and help make the world a better place.

    We should put out an ad for a new Arch Nemesis. Who's going to be the next big, bad, evil symbol of corporate greed now that Bill is gone?

    GuNgA-DiN

  115. WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, now who are we going to me fun of now?

  116. Windows named after Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the best retirement gift for Bill Gates could be a Windows named after him. He created windows some 15-20 years back which brought revolution in computers, huge programs, hardware, games all are possible today because of what he think some 30 years ago. It will be amazing if Microsoft names their next Windows after Bill gates and make it as perfect as it can get just like the great man

  117. A potlatch? by Toddlerbob · · Score: 1

    Since he's from the Northwest, it seems to me appropriate that instead of getting him a retirement gift, he should hold a potlatch. Just make sure and let me know when and where.... ;^)

  118. Re:movie scrip: Demolition Man: Walk of Chief Just by up2ng · · Score: 1

    ummmmmm.

    Dont you mean Judge Dredd

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  119. Linus... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    ...is pronounced LIE-nuss in the US. Not LIH-nuss. Or LEE-nuss. Everyone knows Peanuts. Everyone knows Linus, the little boy with the security blanket. So the natural tendency in the US is to pronounce LIH-nux LIE-nux. Probably most people you will meet outside of geeky circles won't know what Minix is. So nobody will get the joke that spawned the "correct" pronunciation of Linux. So why fight it? LIE-nuss is your security blanket to keep you secure and your files safe from the aftermath of nasty crashes.

    Someone needs to do artwork of Tux with a security blanket.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Linus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not the 'correct' pronunciation with quotes. If Linus Torvalds says it's pronounced Leenucks, that's good enough for me.

  120. A question for you by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    What would you buy him as a retirement gift?"

    Nothing. I have already given him enough money by paying for his OS when I want to run linux.

    Are there no independent white box system builders in your area? Is there no place you can go to have a box built for you? Can you not build one yourself?

    It seems to me a little foolish to complain about the "Microsoft Tax" when you buy something like an HP or Dell. It's kind of like complaining that a GM dealership is slapping an "AC Delco" tax on you because those stereos are standard in GM vehicles. Either don't buy them, or cough up the money to replace them. You actually have more choice in buying PC hardware. You're only stuck with the "Microsoft Tax" if you insist on buying a PC from one of their big OEM partners.

    Hell, you can even get laptops without Windows now.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  121. The Essentials by Xarin · · Score: 1

    What would you buy him as a retirement gift?

    A solid gold house and a rocket car.

  122. Achievement? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    What has Bill Gates personally achieved? Note that personally ripping off the ideas of others is not an achievement.

    Even Gates' enemies don't make statements that dumb.

    Leaving aside the fact that very few people come up with original ideas at all... Steve Jobs ripped off Xerox, the Mac didn't just spring into his imagination from nothingness, you know... the kind of smarts and imagination it takes to build a multi-billion dollar empire is far beyond what most of us will ever have or do.

    As for accomplishments... sometimes improving on an idea is an accomplishment, and while we rightfully skewer MS on what they did wrong, we should then also credit them for what they did right. Office would never have become a standard if customers didn't like it. Exchange would never has become a standard if customers didn't like it. Sharepoint Server is quickly becoming a standard because their customers absolutely love it.

    MS, and Gates, have done plenty right. And they've got billions to show for it.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  123. Bill will love it by czbok · · Score: 0

    a T-shirt with Google logo on it.

  124. usable without post-grad CS? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    You mean, like this or perhaps like this and this?

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:usable without post-grad CS? by Keyslapper · · Score: 1

      Obviously I stand corrected on a few points. Thanks for the history lesson! :)

      I knew about VisiCalc, but for some reason it slipped my mind. I probably would have been more accurate to say that we would have taken much longer to think about making them user friendly to your average housewife with better things to do than learn to use TeX or groff. But that's the goal Gates set for Microsoft.

      Nonetheless, like I said, Gates was a new animal on the scene in the 80s. He was a business savvy computer geek. Not as much a computer geek as the guys involved in VisiCalc, Word Perfect or Lotus 1-2-3, and nowhere near the guys behind groff/troff and TeX. And by the way, I was explicitly excluding those latter tools because they're almost exclusively geek tools. You'll never see those used by an accountant or small business owner.

      Gates' biggest contribution by far is penetration into everyday life. He wanted his hands in every last wallet and business account in the world and that is what he focused on. Not perfection of the product, as many geeks would do (get it working, make it solid, add features, repeat). In order to do this, he needed to know how to make everyone want to use it. Researching this is why Microsoft soared. In the process, MS often forgot or glossed over some of the key steps in the process (like make it solid).

      Putting out software that attempted to show people how easy a task could be done, and how much more value could be added to the finished product, and making it so prone to crashing and losing data, really pissed a lot of people off. Some of them were proper computer nerds who, being more focused on doing a thing well than getting paid well for doing a thing, decided to beat Microsoft out of the market. It took forever for Apple to take up the torch there, but they're a real force now. This isn't because Jobs has gotten better at business than Gates, but he did get better at integrating usability, clean look and stability (though some would reasonably argue that he was always better than Gates in this area).

      And after all this, I think I know what I'd get Gates as a retirement gift: a deposit slip to my bank account ...

  125. Presents? by dcam · · Score: 1

    A book on business ethics? Never too late to learn something new.

    --
    meh
  126. A cake! by yanyan · · Score: 1

    I'd give him a cake with Tux on it!

  127. A Couple of Parting Gifts by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

    A new cell phone.

    I'll even add in a new keyboard to be nice.

  128. 32kbits by reiisi · · Score: 1

    32 kilobits of ROM is not a big field (much less, language), especially when it is divided up into byte chunks, and those bytes are divided up into op-code sequences.

    Someone else mentioned that there were plenty of other options, faster, more compact, more expressive, whatever.

    I'll admit that basic's print statement was a little less obscure to most new users than, say, FORTH's ." word.

    : hello-world ." Hello World!" ;
    hello-world

    as opposed to

    print "Hello World!"

    The FORTH interpreters tended to be a lot easier to understand and build on.

    Lisp? Snobol? Lots and lots of good stuff.

    I think part of the acceptability of BASIC to the business world was that the keywords were called "commands".

    PRINT "You lousy machine!"

    (Although, that's not quite what the PHB thought she wanted.)

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  129. Didn't rip anyone off? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Get real.

    I mean, sure, fair use back then sort of allowed what they did with BASIC, but they sure were never anxious to give credit where credit was due.

    Not on anything.

    And if you think MSWindows was not "sincere flattery", well, you've never written apps in both Macintosh and MSWindows. (And MSWindows is such a pain to interface with. Unless you like copy/paste/chisel programming. I mean, yeah, the Macintosh system was all "framework this" and "framework that", but MFC? Copy, paste, chisel, repeat.)

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  130. Something positive? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    He rode the wave. He got us out on the wave.

    Then he got in his motorboat and left us behind in the undertow.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  131. He has done a great job by Gundamdriver · · Score: 1

    Without Windows... 50% of people on the world will have to pay for expensive Mac (including the hardware, OS and applications), and you need to buy a new version of OS if you want to use new version of Xcode. Having fun with computer? Yeah, "donate" your salary to SJ. For another 50% of people on the world, they will have to fight with those configuration files, edit them with vi, emacs...etc. "console mode rulz!". Hahaha.

  132. A copy of Linux. by lashputin · · Score: 1

    Most probably Debian.

  133. The correct gift was given long time ago... by exit(0) · · Score: 1

    Check out the vid. Probably you have seen it, but I believe it should not be missing from this Bill's hall of fame.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxwWN5bhftE

  134. Cancer by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    What would you buy him as a retirement gift?

    Cancer, of course. First of all, he deserves nothing less. Second, it would be nice to see how he will still choose to stroke his own ego by running his foundation and dangling money in front of people far superior to himself, as opposed to letting competent people to run cancer research that would have a chance to cure him.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  135. An iPod with anti-theft device by hotfireball · · Score: 1

    What would you buy him as a retirement gift?

    An iPod with anti-theft device: http://hideapod.com/

  136. a bugzilla account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he can contribute code directly to various open source projects. The question is, would any of his submitted patches be accepted?

  137. Linux Manual by Lothar · · Score: 1

    To make the guy see sense. A Linux manual is just what he needs. Maybe he should try Ubuntu.

  138. Broken window(s) fallacy by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Disclaimer: I'm not against MS products, I use both Windows and Linux for different purposes, and I've used enough other OSes before to not give much of a damn about any particular one. By Slashdot standards, I tend to actually count as pro-MS, mostly by virtue of where the reference point is.

    That said:

    I credit Windows for bringing the price of consumer hardware down, especially Vista. Just think, if Vista were not so HW-heavy would we have today Dual- and Quad- core processors and _Gigabytes_ of RAM for so cheap? People who use an OS that does not need all that (Ubuntu, for instance) can literally have a system that is four times as powerful as they need, for the same adjusted cost of what a regular system would have cost only three years ago.

    ... is a textbook case of the Broken Window Fallacy.

    You're saying, basically, that by making people pay for hardware and upgrades they didn't actually need, it's stimulated and created a bigger mass market for the hardware industry. That's on par with saying that if you break enough windows, the glass industry will benefit greatly, and it might even bring down the price of glass.

    What makes it a fallacy is ignoring the cost of all that, and pretending that only the good effects exist. It didn't just wave a magic wand and created money for an industry. It made a bunch of people pay for something they didn't need.

    More importantly: money which otherwise would have been used for something else. We don't know what exactly, but it wouldn't be money stuffed under the mattress. (There's a federal reserve, or similar in other countries, which sees to it that money circulates at roughly the desired speed.) Maybe they would have been used to buy something else, and stimulated another industry. Maybe they would have been put in pension funds which in turn get invested in whatever companies are growing fast, essentially giving them more money to grow.

    Broken windows or Windows don't _create_ money or markets. They just force a transfer from one to another. Every cent earned by the glaziers for repairing a broken window, isn't a cent magicked out of thin air, but a cent that someone else didn't earn as a result. Every cent earned by MS or the hardware industry because of broken Windows, is a cent some other industry won't see.

    So you can't just say that it was good for hardware prices, as if the alternative would have been nothing at all. If we didn't spend our collective money on subsidizing hardware research and bringing hardware prices down, we _would_ have something else instead. Maybe better cars, or maybe HDTV sets would have dropped in price instead, or maybe we'd just have more pizza shops. It's impossible to roll back history and peek down the other trouser leg, so we'll never know exactly what we're missing, or if it's better or worse than cheap hardware. But we would have used those money on _something_ anyway, and _some_ industries would have benefited from it instead.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Broken window(s) fallacy by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      No it's not the broken windows fallacy. The broken window fallacy doesn't take into account where the freed money would go. He didn't say that it was good for the economy that there was an upgrade treadmill. It was good for the computer hardware companies and those that need advanced computer hardware.

      If I go out every week and throw rocks through the windows. It's bad for the economy, but it's definately good for the window-makers. Maybe next year I find the window makers have invented a new glass that's harder to break. So I have to shoot the windows out. Next year they're selling bulletproof windows. Now most shops would be hurting from this, but the shops that actually needed bulletproof glass before I came around, would love this.

      Glass-makers love broken windows (as long as they're broken after they're sold)

  139. Huge, glossy black object... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... intended for rectal application. With barbs.

  140. I'd give him... by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    ...a swift kick in the ass!

  141. Google's retirement gift ... by janwedekind · · Score: 1

    ... is a 3D map of the Microsoft Campus.
    Anyone knows what other presents are coming up?

    You can reuse this joke under the terms and conditions of the GFDL.

  142. Free Courses at MIT by myspace-cn · · Score: 1

    Give him some free courses at MIT.
    Give him support for his work in Africa.

    For Kindness sake
    Putting the proprietary vs. open argument away.
    Putting the Windows vs. Linux argument away.
    Putting the XP vs. Vista argument away.

    Full Disclosure: I use XP for video production and linux for just about everything else.

  143. My greed, at any rate, has bounds. by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates could have gone from DOS's partial imitation of Unix to actually implementing Unix underneath his OSses. But, no, he had to have his company re-invent every wheel, building an OS with checkboxes for tasks that didn't need to be done instead of building an OS that allowed users to get their work done.

    Everything his company has done is like that. Give middle management something to do, instead of giving people tools to work productively so they wouldn't tend as much to migrate to middle management.

    Security is a joke because of things like MUAs and web browsers (and file system browsers!) oriented more towards giving other people control of bits and pieces of the user's workstation. Outlook? Sure. It is built precisely for letting admins and advertisers dictate what the user sees. If the user can't control it, there's no way to secure it.

    I am not jealous of a man who has succeeded at nothing more than polluting his own industry.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  144. MOD PARENT UP!!! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    MOD PARENT UP!!!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  145. Investing in evil... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    I bought a McDonald's hamburger once...
    Does that mean that I am guilty for killing at least one tree and at least one cow?

    I've also ordered a Pepsi (or was that Coke?) with it.
    How many people gave their lives in the cold war so that we in the eastern parts of Europe could have the benefits of capitalism and american sodas?
    Am I guilty for their deaths too?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  146. A memory bar! by getuid() · · Score: 1

    What would you buy him as a retirement gift?

    That's easy: a RAM bar! Because 640k is not enough after all :-p

  147. Laugh 'cos it's funny, BUT... by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking about the relation between Steve Jobs and Bill Gates myself. They've been the bitterest of rivals in the past, patched things up somewhat, been bitter rivals again, etc. At the root of this could be the difference in platforms, or it could just be plain and simple competetiveness.

    Bill Gates doesn't have as much of a stake in that competition now. Sure, thanks to Windows his name is a household word, but if that old email that surfaced recently is any indication, he may not be all that pleased with the juggernaut he helped build. He dismissed it as an attempt to improve the product (who wouldn't?), but what if it's not enough, and the culture refuses to change? It could be said that he helped build the cultural æsthetic at Microsoft so well that even he can't steer it any more.

    I'm not saying it'd happen, but I would giggle like a madman for several days if/when Bill Gates admits that Apple was what he was trying to build all along.

    --
    You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
    1. Re:Laugh 'cos it's funny, BUT... by Dolohov · · Score: 1

      Great links, thanks.

  148. Re:Pronounciation by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    You silly git! Correct pronounciation has different answers.

    1) 'Linus' can be pronounced differently (and therefore the related 'Linux') depending on the native language of the speaker, and Linus recognizes that and gives a recorded sample of two different ways here http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/linus/
    2) Linus says it this way, but since he's Swedish it's not just a "short I or long I" question - it sounds to me like a short I blended with a bit of a long E. http://www.paul.sladen.org/pronunciation/

    I don't think anyone has ever said "this is how you pronounce it". We try to do it like the guy who wrote it does, but if you're not a native Swede you're probably going to only get close. I think it's clear that Linus doesn't really care. If I were you I wouldn't correct them, and if the conversation came up, tell them to listen to the MP3 here Linus pronounces it.

  149. Re:Linus... no its LieMiga... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    I say Lie-Miga, as in Amiga, the kick ass machine.

    I wish they ported the amiga to a $99 PDa/mobile at 640x400, that would rock.

    For the record, minix ran like a dog on the amiga, and wasnt impressive compared to the amiga, even RiscOS archimedes were cooler, even tho the OS was cooperative like the old macos.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  150. What would you buy him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > What would you buy him as a retirement gift?

    Yahoo?

  151. a copy of geos by whitroth · · Score: 1

    ... the early-nineties windowing o/s that was better than WinDoze.

          mark

  152. A Parting Gift by rstanley · · Score: 1

    A set of Debian installation DVD's and an installation CD of OpenOffice.org, so he can see the worlds computing future! I think he has seen the writing on the wall, and is jumping ship.

    Ironicly, he has done more to promote Linux, Open Source, and "Free" Software than anyone.

    I don't see much change in the way Mickey$oft will do business in the future. They have never learned from their mistakes!

  153. I don;t think "buy" is the right word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd give him a shiny BLUE RAY (not HDDVD)
    disc with Firefox 3, KDE 4, and a number of linux distro's on it. Oh, yeah and a copy of FreeDos hehe

  154. Retirement Gifts for Gates by rapidfiringneurons · · Score: 1

    What to get him for retirement? Ooh, I know! A Mac. ;)

  155. Gft idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's not popular to support Microsoft or any of the people (especially Mr. Gates) who work there. However, Gates has done a lot to popularise computers and make them a common/cheap item for house holds. Since he has all the money he needs, I think a nice Thank You card and an offer to help at the charitiable foundation might be nice.

  156. My wife would make him some home made jam... by Agent__Smith · · Score: 1

    White chocolate raspberry to be precise...

    --
    "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
  157. Fertilizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A big truck of fertilizer

  158. Evil Monkeys by thc4k · · Score: 1

    When Gates first tried to create his fabled army of evil monkeys, he ended up with just one evil and angry monkey(boy). So he called him Steve and made him president.
    But Gates didn't give up his dream and his army of evil monkeys has been harrassing open source developers ever since

  159. New Job Offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll offer him a job at Google.

  160. That makes no sense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    MS did not invent email, did not see the internet coming and in general has never started a paradigm shift in the industry.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:That makes no sense. by Crane+Style · · Score: 1

      MS did not invent email, did not see the internet coming and in general has never started a paradigm shift in the industry.

      When you ask 90% of the world's population what was their first computer games, I'd bet my paycheck the answer is Hearts, Minesweeper, or Solitaire.

      Starting a paradigm shift, is a relative thing. Personal computing wouldn't be where we are today without MS contribution. Take or leave their business practices, but you're just being ignorant if you claim they didn't revolutionize personal computing.

  161. Yeah great. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You should watch The Godfather.

    Thanking somebody for giving you a job despite of how they can do that is morally suspect.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  162. Avatar. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Avatar. AVATAR. AvAtAr.
    Avatar. AVATAR. AvAtAr.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  163. A big chart by Geminii · · Score: 1

    Sales figures for Vista vs downloads for Firefox :)

  164. A voodoo doll... by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    ...of Steve Ballmer.

    After all wouldn't we all enjoy seeing Steve in pain and being controlled by Bill?

  165. Maybe... by core_dump_0 · · Score: 1

    ...a blue pillow with fake STOP messages on it.

  166. GIFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A MACINTOSH COMPUTeR HE'll LOVE IT!!!!

  167. A nice big bag of nugget by xmvince · · Score: 1

    I doubt he smokes weed, and being the rich man he is, it would be a waste if he didn't start the hobby, especially now that he's retired. So I would buy him a nice fat 20 bag that he and his wife could smoke right to their faces.