Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Changes FiOS AUP, -1, Offtopic

RasputinAXP writes "Verizon has changed their FiOS AUP effective yesterday, and added an interesting new clause to their specific examples that we're all familiar with: 'it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to ... post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites.' At this point, every FiOS-based Slashdot user is breaking the new AUP."

560 comments

  1. My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by sopssa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think it was a cool game. Clever plot, movie-like experience that took your breath away and huge explosions. It was sad that there wasn't more of those sneaky sniper missions however.

    Multiplayer is cool with it's leveling and perks, which actually matter quite a lot. Your characters abilities are totally different based on your perks. Co-op play is also great fun.

    What do you think?

    funny picture

    1. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 4, Informative

      I LIKE TURTLES.

    2. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by timster · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree, and I think it's time for the government to acknowledge the problem.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    3. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yum Potato Pancakes!

      --
      We are the Borg...
    4. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by realisticradical · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Scaramouch, Scaramouch, will you do the Fandango?

    5. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by oldspewey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think the /. admins should hand out 5 mod points to every user immediately, so we can go right ahead and mod every single post in this story offtopic.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    6. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Wait...if being offtopic IS the topic then posting on topic is offtopic as well as posting offtopic. So how does one get modded offtopic when EVERYTHING is on offtopic?

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    7. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by DynamoJoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Thunderbolts and Lightning! Very, very Frightening!

      --
      bah.
    8. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Magnifico!

    9. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by gbarules2999 · · Score: 3, Informative

      $yum install potato-pancakes
      Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto, refresh-packagekit
      You need to be root to perform this command.

    10. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by locallyunscene · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I couldn't have said it better myself.

    11. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      You're sig is inaccurate only keynesian economists, austrian economists don't really have that problem

    12. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Tawnos · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'm just a poor boy nobody loves me

    13. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by oldspewey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And she's buying the stairway to heaven.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    14. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by maddskillz · · Score: 4, Funny

      OMG PONIES!

    15. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

      me, (Galileo) Galileo (Galileo) Galileo, Galileo Figaro

    16. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Afforess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought New Moon was a poorly done movie. The acting was terrible, and the characters themselves, corny. 4/10, would not see again.

      --
      If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
    17. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Grax · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Excuse me but I think the parent post is on-topic, which is obviously off-topic for this topic.

      Don't forget to tip your waitress over!
      I'll be here all week. Unless they let me out.

    18. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by R2.0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    19. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Carbaholic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And now for something completely different, a man with three buttocks

    20. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by NoYob · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My doctor said if I stopped picking my nose, it wouldn't bleed so much.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    21. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What do you think?

      You didn't make it inflamatory, bozo!

    22. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Zixaphir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why, simple, my good Watson! By... OOOOOOO PEANUTS!!!!!!!!

      --
      "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds"
    23. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 1

      Me too!

      /AOL user

    24. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Insightful

          I guess that's better than three men with one buttock. Siamese triplets with one ass? Who wipes it?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    25. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by vishbar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Burma Shave

      --
      Ride the skies
    26. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      FREEEEEE-BIRD!

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    27. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by dem0n1 · · Score: 1

      You blew fish?

      --
      Why save your soul when you can sell it for a profit?
    28. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      He's just a poor boy from a poor family,
      Spare him his life from this monstrosity!

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    29. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ae1294 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Adolf Hitler: psychopathic monster or just misunderstood?

      Mostly misunderstood... He just wanted to reduce toxic CO2 production via the creative use of War and Genocide...

    30. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by barkingcorndog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I agree. The whole Coke vs. Pepsi thing is way overblown. Gravy wins.

      --
      "I know together we'll make the possible totally impossible" - Homme
    31. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      What do you think?

      Mostly whether or not a "first post" would have been on topic yet gotten me flagged by verizon, and whether this post is off topic or on topic.

      Zen for the internet age right there.

    32. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by AnotherShep · · Score: 1

      Something like... 36.

    33. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brothers and I flip a coin. I always try to call the edge.

    34. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Thinboy00 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Parent: Godwin's law or Quirk's exception?

      Discuss.

      --
      $ make available
    35. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      sudo make me potato pancakes

    36. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by uem-Tux · · Score: 1

      BENIFICOOOOOOOOO

      --
      A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills
    37. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that wa ;*h,!9z4?x> NO CARRIER

    38. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I was born...in a cross-fire hurricane....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    39. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by poormanjoe · · Score: 1

      Everyone is all about COD, but has anyone heard about MAG? It's set up just like the real military and instead of a very small 8vs8 online gaming using P2P, this is 128 vs 128 online using their servers. Im not sure if its the first ever, but it's the first ever console MMO I have played. You can spec many differnt ways to build your character. There are three fractions to choose from: A US Army rip off, a terrorist cell, and a futuristic guns for hire fraction. You scan spec to be a sniper, a machine gunner, medic, commmunications, or a balance of them all. You pick the points for specing, very similiar to specing your toon on WoW. If you goto gamestop and pre-order you will recive a beta tester code you redeme in the playstation store. This is a Playstation 3 exculsive, and not exclusive like it will be availble to XBOX eventually, but exclusive like HALO is to XBOX/Windows.

      --
      I want to be retired when I grow up.
    40. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Møøse once bit my sister ...

    41. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by windex82 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What the hell mods, +5 funny, this is defentily off topic.

      The Modern Warfare article is this way. ;)

    42. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ndunnuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      Potato is already a root. Or a tuber, same difference.

    43. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by The+Ultimullet · · Score: 1

      To the mirth mobile!

    44. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Adolf Hitler: psychopathic monster or just misunderstood?

      Mostly misunderstood... He just wanted to reduce toxic CO2 production via the creative use of War and Genocide...

      Damn HIPPIES!

    45. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      You actually watched that movie?

      Here, have some bleach for your eyes.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    46. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Insightful

          If someone flips a coin to decided something with me, I punch them in the face. When they wake up I tell them "Nope, it's what I called." They obviously didn't care much if they left it to the random chance of a coin flip. Try it. You'll find it helps solve a lot of problems. Well, until they start trying to do the same thing. If they swing at you, after they wake up, knock 'em out again just for spite. ... and people say violence doesn't solve anything.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    47. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by MooUK · · Score: 1

      I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me...

    48. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I agree, and I think it's time for the government to acknowledge the problem.

      Yeah, but with the two-party system, your only choice is Republicrats, so there's no way to fix the system. What's needed is an armed revolt.

      (Hm... isn't this rather the kind of reply that is widely considered on-topic in any /. thread?)

    49. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah but the chick that plays Alice had some nudie pix leaked about a month ago...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    50. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by jbezorg · · Score: 1
      And now, the BoHeman Rhapsody
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeFH-QoAPCk

      ... and there goes all my Karma as I inflict this on slashdot. May the song get stuck in your head as it did in mine. :-P

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    51. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by fluch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And why does the ABOVE reply get modded offtopic whereas all the other offtopic replies get modded interesting, insigtful and funny? If something is offtopic in this thread, then it is my post now! ;-)

    52. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      in a row?

    53. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by halfEvilTech · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I would like to think of something off topic but my waffles are burning

      NOOOOOOOOOOO!! RIP Waffles

    54. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a GOOD SOLID WORK-AROUND, CALLED A HOSTS FILE!

      (It works for more speed online, AND SECURITY ESPECIALLY... Also, it works for your money, because you pay for your linetime out of pocket most likely as I do, you can get back your speed, AND, gain security easily, & from a single easily edited file & a file eats no CPU cycles like a local DNS server can (& are not as security vulnerable either if you protect write access to a HOSTS file also)... Anyhow/anyways - Here goes:

      SO - "that all said & aside"? Well, per your reply??

      Hey - NO PROBLEM, 110% agreement here on that account... & more (like more speed online AND more security, via a SINGLE EASILY EDITED + POPULATED FILE, called a HOSTS file):

      I use a custom HOSTS file, in addition to the tools others here in this thread have noted (which MANY like FF addons only really function for FireFox/Mozilla products, but don't extend globally to all other webbound applications, & that is part of what HOSTS files give you above the methods you extoll + utilize: "GLOBAL COVERAGE", & of ALL webbound apps, not just FireFox/Mozilla ones via the addons you noted + use yourself...).

      HOSTS files can be used to blockout KNOWN "bad" adserves, maliciously coded sites or adbanners, and "botnet C&C servers" too!

      You can obtain reliable HOSTS files from reputable lists for more security online, but also for speed!

      (More on that later & WHY/HOW (I use reliable lists for that, such as these HOSTS @ Wikipedia.com -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosts_file or those from mvps.org (a good one this one))

      I also further populate & keep current my custom HOSTS file with up to date information in regards to all of those threats, via:

      ----

      A.) Spybot "Search & Destroy" updates (populates HOSTS and browser block lists)

      B.) Sites like ZDNet's Mr. Dancho Danchev's blog -> http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/

      C.) Sites like FireEye -> http://blog.fireeye.com/

      D.) SRI -> http://mtc.sri.com/

      ----

      My HOSTS file incorporates ALL of the entries from the HOSTS files shown @ wikipedia as well... gaining me speed online (by blocking adbanners, which have been compromised many times the past few years now by malscripted exploits (examples below)).

      (I combined ALL reputable HOSTS files with one of my own (30,000 entries), & I removed duplicates removed via a Borland Delphi app I wrote to do so called "APK HOSTS File Grinder 4.0++". That program also functions to change the default larger & SLOWER 127.0.0.1 blocking 'loopback adapter' IP address to either 0.0.0.0 (for VISTA/Windows Server 2008/Windows 7, smaller & thus faster than 127.0.0.1 default) or the smallest & fastest 0 "blocking 'IP ADDRESS'" (for Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003 which can STILL use it (& it was added in a service pack on Windows 2000, only on 12/09/2008 MS patch tuesday was it removed for VISTA onwards (& now all these "phunny little bugs" are showing up as FLAWS in this new NDIS6 approach via WFP as well in the firewall, which ROOTKIT.COM has stated (with code too no less on how it is done) -> http://www.rootkit.com/newsread.php?newsid=952 [rootkit.com] that it is EASIER TO UNHOOK (than was the design used in Windows 2000/XP/Server 2003))

      Another EXCELLENT benefit of HOSTS file usage? More speed online, & also more security + reliability (especially in the case of DNS servers today, per folks like Dan Kaminsky &/or Moxie Marlinspike finding various security vulnerabilities in them the past couple years now)...

      SO, to "CIRCUMVENT" THAT WHICH YOU NOTE & to get more speed online (besides/above potentially hijacked adbanners etc. et al)?

      WELL - I use another "

    55. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I just wish they'd bring back Crystal Gravy. I don't care what people say, I could totally taste the difference.

    56. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by greenarj · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You will melt faces as a shadow priest in PvP.

    57. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Lord+Lode · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, blue please. With sparkles. Because I came with my bike. Thank you!

    58. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by spidercoz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      wow, you mods are really on the ball today...

      do any of you dumbshit mods even RTFS before you start in, or are you just like "Ooooooooo, Mod Points!" as soon as the page loads?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    59. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by loonicks · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      $ sudo yum install potato-pancakes
      yum: okay!

    60. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it go into the book listing books that list themselves, or the book listing books that don't list themselves?

    61. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by PincushionMan · · Score: 1
      Please, at least post a "This site is entirely in flash" or something. That flash download was huge.

      Now watch this post get an offtopic mod.

    62. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      A Møøse once bit my sister ...

      Signed, Richard Milhaus Nixon

    63. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by spidercoz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      no no, none of the posts in this thread should be offtopic, that's the point

      welcome to slashdot, where irony, humor, and common sense collide and explode in a rain of...hey, where'd my sandwich go?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    64. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ed agrees: This is the best comment ever.

    65. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Nov+Voc · · Score: 1

      Easy come, easy go, will you let me go?

    66. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by SeaHunter · · Score: 1

      Including me?

    67. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by sopssa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      so what did you guys do today?

    68. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by capnkr · · Score: 2, Informative

      How to make your very own Holy Hand Grenade

      Useful to know, when needing to repel the occasional turtle-loving zombie.

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    69. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by element-o.p. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      tuber == root? Is that what the "toor" entry in my /etc/passwd file means? It's just a 1337 spelling for "tuber"?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    70. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Ransak · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Play him off, Keyboard Cat.

      dum dum dum dum da dum dumm...

      --
      "Powers. I have them."
    71. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ae1294 · · Score: 3, Funny

      wow, you mods are really on the ball today...

      Slashdot is full of little bitches who all need to all be punched in their collective faces while their ipods, iphones, macbooks and ps3's all are smashed on the basement floors.

      One day I plan on hacking this site using root / password! and garbing all the marketing/mod logs so I can take a little trip around the world to hand out free punches to each and every one of you fucking cock sucking basement dwelling whores.

      May each of you burn in hell forever as the spaghetti monster devourers your souls one bit at a time.

      and in Satan's name may a pox fall upon your motherboards, bit rot consume your illegal loli porn and may your hard drives all crash and burn.

    72. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You not only need root, you need tuber!

    73. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see your Bohemian Rhapsody and raise you a Muppets Bohemian Rhapsody!

      http://www.youtube.com/user/MuppetsStudio#p/c/C9E4DEEA577A3A79/0/tgbNymZ7vqY

      Dr. Bunsen Honeydew: "Will you let me go?"
      Mahna Mahna: "Ma-na-ma-nah!"
      Snowths: "do do do do do do"
      Lew Zealand: "Let me throw."
      Mahna Mahna: "Ma-na-ma-nah!"
      Beauregard: "I will not let you throw."
      Crazy Harry: "Let me blow."
      Mahna Mahna: "Ma-na-ma-nah!"
      Beauregard: "I will not let you blow."
      Fozzie Bear: "Let me joke."
      Statler and Waldorf: "Do not like your jokes."
      Fozzie Bear: "Let me joke."
      Statler and Waldorf: "Do not like your jokes."
      Fozzie Bear: "Let me joke."
      Statler and Waldorf: "Do not like your jokes."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    74. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but Moon was a great movie! The best Science fiction movie of 2009 by far.

      Oh wait, you meant Twilight.

    75. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Excuse me but I think the parent post is on-topic, which is obviously off-topic for this topic.

      Head asplodes.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    76. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I thought New Moon was a poorly done movie. The acting was terrible, and the characters themselves, corny. 4/10, would not see again.

      Yeah, but Edward has a soul!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    77. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Looce · · Score: 1

      Thunder bolts of lightning very very frightening me!

    78. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by sopssa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Moon was a great movie, the single science fiction I've managed to watch for years actually.

    79. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by sopssa · · Score: 1

      Excluding me?

    80. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      These posts are off-topic in the same way that this sentense has exactly three erors.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    81. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was a cool game. Clever plot, movie-like experience that took your breath away and huge explosions. It was sad that there wasn't more of those sneaky sniper missions however.

      Multiplayer is cool with it's leveling and perks, which actually matter quite a lot. Your characters abilities are totally different based on your perks. Co-op play is also great fun.

      What do you think?

      funny picture

      Me too!

    82. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      One day I plan on hacking this site using root / password! and garbing all the marketing/mod logs

      Garbing them in what? Does anyone know what the latest in marketing log fashion is?

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    83. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by vegiVamp · · Score: 3, Funny

      I *know* violence isn't the answer. I get it wrong on purpose.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    84. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pics or it didn't happen.

    85. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by vegiVamp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please link to your sources :-D

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    86. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tuber player doesn't annoy anyone.

    87. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Toze · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      so i herd u liek mudkips

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    88. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      You've just been wooshed pretty hard...think about it.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    89. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ysth · · Score: 1

      "An Inconvienient Place: About 70 Miles East of Here, Where It's Lighter"

    90. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by MistrBlank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Preston and Steve FTW

    91. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Barryke · · Score: 1

      This comment just made me have to watch New Moon to see what all the fuss is about. Darn you!

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    92. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by AK+Dave · · Score: 1

      VADER FTW!

      something something DARK SIDE something something

    93. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by AK+Dave · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Just the one buttock?

      Thats so half-assed!

    94. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Foole · · Score: 0

      The dog is on fire.

      --
      This is not a turnip.
    95. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Erinnys+Tisiphone · · Score: 1

      Nah, Dragon Age: Origins, hands down. I mean, it has like, dragons. And stuff. Anybody want Taco Bell?

    96. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by poormanjoe · · Score: 1

      You mean you don't have Verizon FiOS?

      --
      I want to be retired when I grow up.
    97. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I use apt-get, you insensitive clod.

      On a serious note, I just wanted to comment on this article. I think consolidation has ruined commercial radio. The average radio station has a smaller playlist than my 4GB Sansa MP3 player (without the 8GB SDHC Micro card in it!). Why allow myself to be smothered in commercials just to hear the same crap over and over. If it's not classical or talk radio, I just don't bother. I carry a perfect music selection that's much broader and commercial free... and for long trips, I break out the big ol' ugly 80GB Neuros!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    98. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      For Pony!

    99. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind if they made it a violation of the TOS to improperly use its and it's.

      And enforce it.

      But not very damned likely, and more's the shame.

      Its not worth it, man. You just can't fight City Hall if its in charge. And fiber doesn't change it's attitude.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    100. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      do you have battletoads?

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    101. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like shamrock shakes. They smell like gum.

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    102. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Michael+O-P · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I like black licorice.

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    103. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Depends who's got the arm...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    104. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prophet Norman? Is that you?

    105. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Armed revolt isn't called for... yet. I called for legged revolt... kick their asses out of office.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    106. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Bismillah! No, we will not let you go!

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    107. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We love you too!

    108. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL:DR

      besides the book was better

    109. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ironically, this funny mod will probably be the final ignominy that drives the parent over the edge.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    110. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Ironically, this funny mod will probably be the final ignominy that drives the parent over the edge.

      0,o

    111. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by dwillden · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree, the incorrect usage of the English Langu... SQUIRREL!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    112. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I yam what I yam

    113. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by azav · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Whatever happened to the PONIES?!

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    114. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by azav · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we could have told you that.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    115. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Fred+IV · · Score: 1

      Now all the criminals in their coats and their ties are free to drink martinis and watch the sun rise.

    116. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Please link to your sources :-D

      http://www.celebshotpics.com/tgp/Ashley_Greene1/index1.html citation needed

    117. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is full of little bitches who all need to all be punched in their collective faces while their ipods, iphones, macbooks and ps3's all are smashed on the basement floors.

      As an Android using, Lenovo and Dell owning PC gamer listening to my Cowon Iaudio 7 I have no qualms with this action.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    118. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by cubricon · · Score: 1

      I haven't posted anything on slashdot in a long while. I must agree that music production is a totally different beast these days compared to 20 years ago or even 50 for that matter. Anyway, I really like electronic music as well as acoustic music (which pretty much sums up all music right?)

      anyway, if this is a shameless plug that only a few people will ever read, then so be it.

      go slashdot my websites and download some free tunes!

      Free Electronic Music Here cubricon.com/3PM
      More Free Electronic Music Here anthonydias.com/3PM
      post script - I think AT&T has weak spots in their coverage plan.

    119. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by cubricon · · Score: 1

      hey, how come my links don't show up? am I that much of a noob that I can't even post links?

      -----
      And now, I can't even post this stupid reply to myself. I suppose slashdot thinks I'm trying to spam, or post something off topic...

    120. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by nexxuz · · Score: 1

      If violence is not the answer the the wrong question was asked! LOOK OUT HERE COMES CHUCK NORRIS!!!

      --
      I love random hex numbers! Just like this one, 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    121. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by nexxuz · · Score: 1

      Well, he likes fishsticks. He is a gay fish!

      --
      I love random hex numbers! Just like this one, 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    122. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by hey! · · Score: 1

      OMG, that OMG has a an acronym for everything!

      So what is PONIES?

      Peer Oriented Network for Interconnecting Enterprise Systems?

      Public Object Nomenclature for Integrating Engineering Specifications?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    123. Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2 by treeves · · Score: 1

      I think it's MAGNIFICO-O-O-O-O. Nobody loves me either.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  2. Windows ME by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 4, Funny

    My experience with Windows ME wasn't exactly a good one. As soon as I installed a second hard drive, it would bluescreen at boot. XP was better back then (when it was first released).

    1. Re:Windows ME by Kjella · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but that post is automatically -1, Redundant instead because it's been done to death, resurrected as a horse, flogged to death and beyond then turned into a zombie and still haunts this place.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Windows ME by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If I had mod points I'm not sure how I would mod you:
      On the one hand, you're on-topic by speaking directly to the off-topic nature of the GP, but then, the real topic of this whole thread is "off-topic", which makes reference to the topic on-off-topic, which is ultimately off-topic, which is the focus of-
      *Head asplodes*

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    3. Re:Windows ME by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      To open the secret cow level, all you need to do is put Wirt's leg and a tome of book portal in the cube.

    4. Re:Windows ME by Again · · Score: 1

      Well, on my Thinkpad I wasn't even able to install XP. Everytime I tried it would blue screen. And yes, the cd was legitimate.

    5. Re:Windows ME by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm pretty sure that that is not the original intended use of nmap!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    6. Re:Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yo, I'm really happy for your experience and Imma let you finish, but Windows 2000 was the greatest Windows OS of all time!

    7. Re:Windows ME by bertoelcon · · Score: 2, Funny

      AC, I'm really happy for ya and imma let you finish but Kayne is the best troll of all time. The best of all time.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    8. Re:Windows ME by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

      Before or after he killed Abel?

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    9. Re:Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be true, but how else are you going to get a shower? I recommend using a little butter.

    10. Re:Windows ME by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Kjella's experience with comments on this story wasn't exactly a good one. As soon as he saw the second OT post, he called the OP on it. Slashdot was better back then (when it was pre web 2.0).

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    11. Re:Windows ME by Silicon+Jedi · · Score: 1

      Kayne killed Aybil, not Abel

    12. Re:Windows ME by MooUK · · Score: 1

      He had nothing on Moses.

    13. Re:Windows ME by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

      Ultimate frisbee rocks! if you don't believe me then go edit wikipedia!

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
    14. Re:Windows ME by jggimi · · Score: 1
      "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased."

      Kehlog Albran

      -The Profit-

    15. Re:Windows ME by Verdatum · · Score: 2, Informative

      The trick is to teleport into your own brain, and tear out your common sense. Then you will be able to pick up the "tea" and the "no tea" at the same time. The ship's computer will be so impressed by this feat that it will finally open the door for you and you can begin to explore Magrathea.

    16. Re:Windows ME by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      You got that right. One of the best rebound guys ever to play the game.

    17. Re:Windows ME by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's precisely statements like these that will set back the sexual revolution at least 100 years. Please try to be less judgemental in the future.

    18. Re:Windows ME by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      what if the camel is lit?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    19. Re:Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had nothing on Moses.

      A moose once bit my sister

    20. Re:Windows ME by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The lesson behind humpty dumpty is that you can't undo the past, so don't fall off the friggin' wall.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    21. Re:Windows ME by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      To open the secret cow level, all you need to do is put Wirt's leg and a tome of book portal in the cube.

      Or you can give Wirt's leg to Cynthia, and she'll give you a copy of Blueshift on CD! (Never mind that you had half the tracks already from Redshift, and the rest from MP3s found online from a leaked review copy...)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    22. Re:Windows ME by demonbug · · Score: 1

      To open the secret cow level, all you need to do is put Wirt's leg and a tome of book portal in the cube.

      Or you can give Wirt's leg to Cynthia, and she'll give you a copy of Blueshift on CD! (Never mind that you had half the tracks already from Redshift, and the rest from MP3s found online from a leaked review copy...)

      Oh, believe me, I gave Cynthia Wirt's leg. If you know what I mean.

      But then that furry came up spewing some nonsense about killing Rathy. Who the hell is Rathy?

    23. Re:Windows ME by therufus · · Score: 1

      the cake is a lie!!!
      the cake is a lie!!!
      the cake is a lie!!!

      --
      You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    24. Re:Windows ME by dwillden · · Score: 1

      So it's OMG Zombie Ponies!!!!???

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    25. Re:Windows ME by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      My experience with Windows ME wasn't exactly a good one. As soon as I installed a second hard drive, it would bluescreen at boot. XP was better back then

      Why were you mucking about with WinMe if XP was better at that time? Hopefully you tossed them all in the bin now in favor of linux. The newest Ubuntu is quite nice, and its derivative, Linux Mint 8, is the best distro I've seen.
      [runs on stage and grabs mic away from Steve Ballmer] I'd like to take this opportunity to thank Mint 8, and the Academy, Ceiling Cat, and the big guy, Flying Spaghetti Monster. Screw MS. Microsoft, I mean, not multiple sclerosis. Not that I support the disease, I mean I wish the sufferers luck and a cure.
      Got any gum?

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    26. Re:Windows ME by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      To open the secret cow level, all you need to do is put Wirt's leg and a tome of book portal in the cube.

      Or you can give Wirt's leg to Cynthia, and she'll give you a copy of Blueshift on CD! (Never mind that you had half the tracks already from Redshift, and the rest from MP3s found online from a leaked review copy...)

      Oh, believe me, I gave Cynthia Wirt's leg. If you know what I mean.

      Adam might have something to say about that. But then again, maybe not...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  3. Have you guys ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you guys ever rolled up pickles in a slice of ham? It's really good.

    1. Re:Have you guys ever... by PizzaAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0

      Someone talking about ham? Here I am!

      I love big fat pan-pizza with lots of crusty cheese filled with slices of ham, pineapple, shrimp and salami with BBQ sauce dropped in top of it. With a mountain dew on side and chocolate ice cream as dessert. And strawberries. And beer. And hookers.

      I mean, big steak barbecued is great too. And so are hamburgers and hot dogs. But nothing can ever beat big fat pizza.

      Mmmmm, I'm out to eat.

    2. Re:Have you guys ever... by sopssa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the problem here is the constant Windows vs. Linux fighting. We've spend all this time fighting and completely forgot to laught at how stupid Mac OS X users are.

    3. Re:Have you guys ever... by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Leave Britney alone

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    4. Re:Have you guys ever... by dburkland · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Have you guys ever... by LoSt180 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ham? Isn't bacon made from ham? I love bacon.

    6. Re:Have you guys ever... by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

      Has anyone noticed that movies about vampires get a lot of attention these days?

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
    7. Re:Have you guys ever... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      The price you paid for that airline ticket has nothing to do with what commodities traders in Taiwan had for breakfast. Geez, anyone could see that it's obviously related to football scores from last week.

    8. Re:Have you guys ever... by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      movies about your mom get a lot of attention these days

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    9. Re:Have you guys ever... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Britney uses EMACS

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    10. Re:Have you guys ever... by DeusExCalamus · · Score: 1

      movies about your mom get a lot of attention these days

      that's what she said!

      --
      "...Sleep comes like a drug in God's country Sad eyes, crooked crosses in God's country..."
    11. Re:Have you guys ever... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Wait... most of the trolls I've read have insinuated that Mac users are gay, not stupid... have I been misinformed... by the trolls? Or are those two pejoratives now considered interchangeable in modern vernacular?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    12. Re:Have you guys ever... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Britteny isn't smart enough to use emacs she probably uses vi.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    13. Re:Have you guys ever... by demonbug · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I think she's one v short of vi.

  4. Someone wants to check /. from work by ShiningSomething · · Score: 1

    Verizon may, but is not required to, monitor your compliance, or the compliance of other subscribers, with the terms, conditions or policies of this Agreement and AUP.

    1. Re:Someone wants to check /. from work by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cute. That statement amounts to giving themselves the power to inspect both the origin/destination and the content of all communications.

      Better SSL up.

    2. Re:Someone wants to check /. from work by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Not to mention within the terms and conditions of the law, which may well forbid them exactly that.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    3. Re:Someone wants to check /. from work by therufus · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this as a troll. The poster has actually posted something that is ON TOPIC.

      The shame!

      OMG PONIES!!!!! ----->

      --
      You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
  5. haha that's funny by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    anyways, guys, i wanted to tell you about this new band i'm listen to. it's called gently liv###

    [NO CARRIER]

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:haha that's funny by Fritz+T.+Coyote · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Raise your hand if you remember when putting "NO CARRIER" in a post was considered Rude as it could make some terminal emulators think the modem had dropped the call.

      OK, get your health care aid to help you raise your hand.

      Now all of you kids get off my lawn!

    2. Re:haha that's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm I always thought it was the +++ that caused all the problems.

    3. Re:haha that's funny by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn you, it took me 7 minutes to log back in!

    4. Re:haha that's funny by gid · · Score: 4, Informative

      Never knew about NO CARRIER but I remember +++ath0 could make some modems hang up, but you had to get the user on the other end to type it in to get the modem to hang it up. If they were running a linux machine, you could craft an icmp packet, or use sendmail or ftp to echo the string back to you.

      Some modems fixed this by requiring a pause.

    5. Re:haha that's funny by sopssa · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some Linksys router's were even more fun (along with some Norton antivirus I think). If you sent "CHR(1)DCC SEND test 0 0 0" to IRC channel or private message, it would make the Linksys router drop all connections hence disconnecting the user from IRC too. That done in a large channel and you saw hundreds of users dropping.

    6. Re:haha that's funny by Grax · · Score: 5, Funny

      A bear walks into a bar and says "I would like a beer ... ", waits 30 seconds, then says "... and a wine cooler."

      The bartender says, "OK. But why the big pause?"

      The bear says, "I dunno. I've always had them"

    7. Re:haha that's funny by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      hmm I always thought it was the +++ that caused all the problems.

      +++,ATH1,ATAL0,ATDP911

    8. Re:haha that's funny by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      A horse walks into a bar.

      The bartender says, "Why the long face?"

    9. Re:haha that's funny by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Damn you, it took me 7 minutes to log back in!

      Well the trick is to use plenty of lubricant and make sure the blade is sharp.

      Also, don't forget to call ahead and make sure they've got tomatoes in stock.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    10. Re:haha that's funny by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      avocados work in a pinch

      or if time permits, a truculent badger will clean that up in a day or two

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    11. Re:haha that's funny by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 2, Funny

      Three men walk into a bar, the fourth ducks.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    12. Re:haha that's funny by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Works better when it's Sarah Jessica Parker.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    13. Re:haha that's funny by azmodean+1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, but you could usually get the same effect by posting "Hey guys, use Alt+F5 to enable the special DCC recv mode and I'll send you some {illicit data of the moment}"

    14. Re:haha that's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it was worse than that, whatever packet inspection thing the router was using didn't look for the 0x01 at the beginning of the command and only looked for "DCC SEND filename ip port filesize" (it used the ip/port to allow forwarding through the firewall, and crashed on an invalid ip/port) We set "DCC SEND x 0 0 0" as the topic of our channel for a while just for the lulz.

    15. Re:haha that's funny by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      A priest, a rabbi, and a minister walk into a bar.

      You'd think one of 'em was watching where they were going.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    16. Re:haha that's funny by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      A virus walks into a bar. The bartender says we don't serve viruses in this bar. The virus replaces the bartender and says "Now we do."

      An infections diseases walks into a bar. The bartender says we don't serve infections diseases in this bar. The infections disease says "Well, you're not a very good host."

      Two bacteria walk into a bar. The bartender says we don't serve bacteria here. The bacteria say "But we work here. We're staph!"

      Scrodinger's cat walks into a bar.... and doesn't.

      http://www.youtube.com/user/sciencecomedian#p/a/f/1/e7DkeQ0roAM

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    17. Re:haha that's funny by TheEmpyrean · · Score: 1

      Hey Fido, look out for that tru&$*&#^--#

      [NO TERRIER]

    18. Re:haha that's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Set the subject line to "Press ALT-F4 for Ops!" Hilarity ensued.

    19. Re:haha that's funny by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      A priest, a rabbi & a minister walk into a bar.
      "What's this?" says the barman "some kind of a joke?"

      --
      FGD 135
    20. Re:haha that's funny by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

      A termite walks into a bar and asks, "Is the bar tender here?"

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    21. Re:haha that's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When is a shirt not a shirt?

      When it's attire!

    22. Re:haha that's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never knew about NO CARRIER but I remember +++ath0 could make some modems hang up, but you had to get the user on the other end to type it in to get the modem to hang it up. If they were running a linux machine, you could craft an icmp packet, or use sendmail or ftp to echo the string back to you.

      Some modems fixed this by requiring a pause.

      no, the initial modems had the hold time pause in them. The cheap ones didn't, iirc, to avoid patent issues.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayes_command_set

      (posting AC to avoid whoring karma.)

    23. Re:haha that's funny by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Yep, the patent was called the Guard Time patent, and was patent number 4,549,302, owned by Hayes. The latter modems to be more precise used TIES. Hayes even ended up advertising in magazines about the dangers of TIES, as well as inserting it into the beginning of press releases. The modem makers using it responded with lawsuits, forcing Hayes to pull the ads off.

    24. Re:haha that's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the marvelous "startkeylogger" keyword for Norton versus IRC.

    25. Re:haha that's funny by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      Shroedingers cat walks into a bar and doesn't.

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
  6. Hey Verizon! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Go Fu*NO CARRIER

    1. Re:Hey Verizon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Camo sheep behind you

  7. For all you baseball fans by sconeu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The Red Sox, the Yankees, the Phillies and the Angels are interested in Roy Halladay.

    Anyone have any other baseball related news?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:For all you baseball fans by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 0, Troll

      I got moded troll for a baseball analogy that devolved into something about fryed chicken. I don't know much about baseball so I made up something to be funny and got modded troll.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    2. Re:For all you baseball fans by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      I used to watch a lot more baseball than I do now. Of course, back then I lived in a different neighbourhood, and there was a totally awesome Thai place right around the corner that used to make these really good basil rolls.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:For all you baseball fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red Sox's newest solution to their shortstop dilemma is to move Pedroia over to short and go find a new second baseman instead. He can't be worse than Lugo, I guess.

      Don't think either the Sox or Yankees will trade for Halladay. Too expensive in players. Sox are supposedly interested in John Lackey instead, if they want a pitcher.

    4. Re:For all you baseball fans by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

      Slashdot doesn't have a special case for posts like this, which should get moderator points added for being offtopic.

    5. Re:For all you baseball fans by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Funny is dangerous to your karma. It gains no karma even with a +5, but is easily percieved as being a troll or flamebait.

      From the link: "On the streets these days, a dime bag of kittens costs a pretty penny." ~ Oscar Wilde on Slashdot's "offtopic" moderation

    6. Re:For all you baseball fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once it's OffTopic, mod it underrated.

    7. Re:For all you baseball fans by infolation · · Score: 1

      Fried

    8. Re:For all you baseball fans by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      While that would work, none of the post are worth wasting to mod points for.

      They should turn off moderation for this article :)

  8. I'm Not! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At this point, every FiOS-based Slashdot user is breaking the new AUP.

    I think I'll be the first one to stay ON TOPIC!!!

    Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I'm sending over the net. Shouldn't that be Illegal?

    1. Re:I'm Not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I'm sending over the net. Shouldn't that be Illegal?

      Why has Slashdot turned into the new hang out for morons? Why can't these people just leave for once and for all?

    2. Re:I'm Not! by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I'm sending over the net. Shouldn't that be Illegal?

      Honestly, they don't care as long as you pay and nobody complains. This is just another case where if they get complaints from someone, they can terminate you for ToS violation. In reality, not much has changed - have you read some of them? There's usually enough insane terms to terminate anyone, any time anyway. This is just adding one more possible excuse to put on the termination notice.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:I'm Not! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I wuold suspect the medssage board admin just need to complain about you to verizon... and all the implies.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:I'm Not! by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Awwww ... look ... somebody who doesn't think their traffic is already being monitored ... how cute.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:I'm Not! by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suspect this is just the next level of ISPs' disallowing spamming. They probably aren't planning to actively enforce it, but if it were to come to their attention that one of their accounts is being used to post 100's of more or less subtle marketing messages a day to forums, they reserve the right to cut the account off.
      That said I actually have no idea, just a guess.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    6. Re:I'm Not! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I think I'll be the first one to stay ON TOPIC!!!

      Stay on topic, Red Five, stay on topic. Almost there...

    7. Re:I'm Not! by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

      This just proves once again privatization is better than gov't. See corporations are even better at censorship than governments are. You don't need messy strong men to silence viewpoints, you just need to have absolute power over the dominant medium of the day.

    8. Re:I'm Not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should, like, give us this... this power, see?
      And we like, totally promise not to abuse it, y'dig?

      Yeah, that's the ticket.

    9. Re:I'm Not! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Well there's plenty of AUP's that already block SPAM. Why didn't they just say "even subtle spam is still considered spam."

    10. Re:I'm Not! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Well, if they're reading all the information being sent over the Internet, then clearly Verizon is responsible for allowing distribution of online child porn and any other illegal material. I mean, they wouldn't seek common carrier protection from any responsibility while breaking the rules that common carriers have to follow, would they?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    11. Re:I'm Not! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Stay on topic, Red Five, stay on topic. Almost there..."

      Red October....standing by....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:I'm Not! by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Except that they don't respond to complaints at all:

      Repeated complaints to Verizon and to his [a troll on Wikipedia] family members have been completely unsuccessful at curbing his abuse. Due to collateral damage resulting from his vandalism, large numbers of Verizon customers have been unable to edit Wikipedia.

      Source

      --
      $ make available
    13. Re:I'm Not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect this is just the next level of ISPs' disallowing spamming. They probably aren't planning to actively enforce it, but if it were to come to their attention that one of their accounts is being used to post 100's of more or less subtle marketing messages a day to forums, they reserve the right to cut the account off.

      ""Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We *want* them broken.""
      [/tinfoil]

    14. Re:I'm Not! by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Chances are someone got into a situation and this was added as a result. "It wasn't spam. Might have been off topic, but it wasn't spam." Pow, new regulation they can enforce. There's a guy somewhere who knows *exactly* why this was added.

      Like Dr. Pepper has a warning to not aim at friends when opening, or McDonald's warning that hot coffee might be hot.

    15. Re:I'm Not! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is wikipedia's fault that they added this.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    16. Re:I'm Not! by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      So, in my Terms of Use policy I can extend any other entities AUP? Assume for a second that I skip the obvious like "...reserve the right to fornicate with your hot wife". How about if I add a small charge like 5 cents, American, for every post you make payable by your ISP. Lean back and issue bills after six months or so. Would the ensuing litigation create bad or good case law for consumers?

      While we are playing at annoying rhetorical questions, if two trains leave opposite coasts towards Chicago, which one will beat the Greyhound bus?

    17. Re:I'm Not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post was on topic. You need to get shot.

    18. Re:I'm Not! by Tibia1 · · Score: 1

      Just because your parents are reading your text messages doesn't mean you should complain about it.

    19. Re:I'm Not! by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      October Sky standing by...

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  9. OUTRAGED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a FIOS user, this is total BS.
    On an unrelated note...
    [NO CARRIER]

  10. OMG Im breaking my AUP!! by Golbez81 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm going straight to hell!

    1. Re:OMG Im breaking my AUP!! by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going straight to hell!

      If you are a Verizon customer, you are already here.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:OMG Im breaking my AUP!! by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      go directly to hell, do not pass go, do not collect $200

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  11. I don't use v by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that is why I refuse to use Verizon. Besides, comcast cable internet is faster anways...

  12. Who gets to decide the topic? by jeffmeden · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm not posting off topic, YOU are posting off topic!

    If I were a Verizon FiOS customer I would change my sig to "That may seem off topic but it isn't." See? These aren't the droids you are looking for, after all.

  13. Cows by InsaneMosquito · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Anyone seen any cows recently? I always love when they go 'Moo'.

    1. Re:Cows by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      As I just said above, all you need to do is put Wirt's leg and a book of town portal in the cube.

    2. Re:Cows by crazycheetah · · Score: 1

      Damn those cows! So many hours spent staring at a bunch of cows trying to kill my little isometric Barbarian. And all I wanted was another goddamn level!

      This really is hell... damn. I always thought that plane crash seemed too real to be a dream....

    3. Re:Cows by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      and then the chuds came

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    4. Re:Cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do my shoes smell funny?

    5. Re:Cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Hail the Cow King
      translated
      Moo Moo Moo Moo Moo

    6. Re:Cows by therufus · · Score: 1

      the cake is (still) a lie!!!
      the cake is (still) a lie!!!
      the cake is (still) a lie!!!

      --
      You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    7. Re:Cows by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1

      How in the hell did you get modded off topic? This is one of the few stories where being off topic is actually on topic.

  14. Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by DynamoJoe · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Discuss.

    --
    bah.
    1. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Golbez81 · · Score: 1

      What about a super star destroyer!? Oh hi verizon just violating more of my AUP!

    2. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Joe+U · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SCUBA is an acronym for Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus

    3. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer. Discuss.

    4. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is neither angled nor singular. DIscuss.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were on topic for the thread, you lose. +5 interesting.

    6. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

      Considering that it is "news for nerds," I'd say that it is pretty angled towards "nerds."

    7. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Discuss.

      Banana's, fried with honey.

      Delicious.

    8. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      your mom is an acronym for Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    9. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Off topic - what does your mom have to do with this?

    10. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by stubob · · Score: 1

      Nor was it presumably capable of destroying a star. Now, the super star destroyer surely was capable of destroying a superstar.

      --
      Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
    11. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was more of a planet destroyer, but I guess that doesn't sound as cool...

    12. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer

      I don't think that's a good reason to put another excuse on the TOS notice. The salad has too much lettuce for that.

    13. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Slashdot isn't singular? What's the inverse of Slashdot, then?

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    14. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor did it destroy any stars.

    15. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by sp332 · · Score: 1

      And everyone knows that nerds are single.

    16. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      Uh, most people here are singular.

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    17. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer.

      Wasn't a destroyer? A destroyer is a type of ship, I think it's defined as having big guns for destroying other ships, that fits "star destroyer" for me ("star ship [Sails in space], ship destroyer")

      I have no idea why I wrote this, I'm not even really in to Star Wars.

    18. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet it did destroy things, if not stars. The Sun Crusher did the actual star destruction.

      Also, due to its use in the opening scene, the "Star Destroyer" was a minor star of the film.

    19. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by BranMan · · Score: 1

      It all depends - is a Star Destroyer actually meant to destroy something? Consider - the modern Destroyer class is actually a shortened version of the real name, from about WWI timeframe - Torpedo Boat Destroyer. Torpedo boats were the time's 'super weapon' that would render all larger ships obsolete (like battleships). What actually happened was they built a new class of fleet escorts to deal with them - fast enough that they couldn't be out-maneuvered by the torpedo boats, with enough firepower to blow them out of the water, and nimble enough to dodge the torpedos themselves. Problem solved.

      So, back to the question - is there a specific threat the Start Destroyer was meant to protect larger Imperial fleet units from?

    20. Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you are thinking of the Death Star. Which I guess would be better named the Death Moon, since the Death Star isn't a star either, but it is moon-sized and brings death to planets.

  15. Part (b) : "flaming" by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities, including without limitation, "spamming", "flaming" or denial of service attacks;

    You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.

    1. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Icegryphon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see they have been spending one time on the *chan sites.

    2. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by lavacano201014 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I like the new clause. All the sites of the world say "No Flaming, No OffTopic in our forums.". What happens when those rules are broken too much? They ban from the site. Verizon's just helpin' out. "No Flaming, No OffTopic in anyone's forums." What happens when the AUP is broken? They cut off the Internet connection. You may not realize it, but Verizon's just trying to make the Internet a place for halfway intelligent people again, instead of whiny 12-year-olds all going "LOL GUYS! I'M USING TEH INTERBUTT!"

      --
      A wise man once said, "Where is my other quotation mark?
    3. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Clever7Devil · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong. You were supposed to attack their sexuality.

      --
      "By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect 'Hungry.'" -Gary Larson
    4. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by oenone.ablaze · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I suspect that it's because Verizon just cares about what's going on in _their_ forums, and they included that clause so they could terminate the internet service of complainers / trolls in their forums without saying so explicitly. That's what I would do, if I were a myopic, profit-maximizing natural monopoly.

    5. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1
      fuck you, you product of a failed abortion! What, were you born with a coathanger sticking out of your head? Did your mom have any kids that lived other than the ones I stuck her with?

      fucking waste of skin asshole. Die in a fire, you douchebag ignoramus right-wing pinko liberal nazi bag of puke-ridden shit.

      Now THAT's a proper flame! COME GET ME, VERIZON!

    6. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by myvirtualid · · Score: 1
      You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.

      But dude, that's on-topic.

      Oh, man. We need to recover this thread, ASAP.

      I just had a cookie. I like cookies. Especially Farmers Market oatmeal raisin cookies, homemade ginger crinkles, and those butter cookies that only Mom makes right.

      Do you like cookies?

      I do.

      --
      I'm here EdgeKeep Inc.
    7. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities,

      This reminds me how silly and broad these ToSes are. That appears to even making pinging against the ToS. What is an "uninvited communication" when it comes to the internet?

    8. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.

      You must be new here. On slashdot, that ain't flaming or spamming, that's preaching to the choir.

    9. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALBATROS! (since flaming is no longer allowed)

    10. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I wish fios was part of that monopoly. Cuz right now it seems to get it you have to be in one of the blue areas of At&t's map and not Verizons red map...

    11. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I didn't see the word asswipe anywhere! Somebody please edit that linked article!

      It does say "evil" though.

    12. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the spellchecker does underline "asswipes" when I type it, but it doesn't underline "assholes", and it doesn't underline "Verizon" either, so make your own assumptions.

    13. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      yeah, your mom's cookies rock

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    14. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying that Verizon is telling their trolls "Can you hear me now?"

    15. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. Section (b)(iii) clearly states that any content you post "needs moar DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU".

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    16. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      They are anything but a natural monopoly. A result of artificial market manipulation with government aid if I ever saw it.

    17. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how dare they ban flaming! I like my beers cold and my homosexuals flaNO CARRIER

    18. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I suspect that it's because Verizon just cares about what's going on in _their_ forums, and they included that clause so they could terminate the internet service of complainers / trolls in their forums without saying so explicitly. That's what I would do, if I were a myopic, profit-maximizing natural monopoly.

      Any how, exactly, is that comment off-topic?

      Fuck you Verizon, bunch of punk-ass honkey-looking nigger wannabee spic-loving slopes anyhow

    19. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Ruvim · · Score: 1

      I like eating at the mall. Food a t "Flamers" sucks though!

    20. Re:Part (b) : "flaming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tröll önce bited mine sister. Nö, really!

  16. guys this is off topic by Saryn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Let's stay on topic. It's in the AUP.

    1. Re:guys this is off topic by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      your mom's in the AUP

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  17. Why they may have done so by JoshuaZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    This may be overbroad wording in response to spam comments or the like (remember the Christmas store junk that kept getting posted here over the last few weeks?). The wording is broad, but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond.

    Sorry if that's too ontopic. I guess I could help that out by copy and pasting some hot fanfic but a quick google search doesn't show any Steven Chu/Terry Tao slash.

    1. Re:Why they may have done so by conlaw · · Score: 2, Funny

      The wording is broad, but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond.

      But if it's too broad, an affected customer can try to get a court to throw it out on grounds of ambiguity! Now do the hokey-pokey and turn yourself around. That's what its all about!

    2. Re:Why they may have done so by pz · · Score: 1

      This may be overbroad wording in response to spam comments or the like (remember the Christmas store junk that kept getting posted here over the last few weeks?). The wording is broad, but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond.

      Sorry if that's too ontopic. I guess I could help that out by copy and pasting some hot fanfic but a quick google search doesn't show any Steven Chu/Terry Tao slash.

      And it gives them ammunition to terminate essentially anyone's service, at will, since deciding whether a posting is on-topic or off-topic is entirely subjective.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re:Why they may have done so by pz · · Score: 1

      It's all spelled out in their AUP, first paragraph:

      General Policy: Verizon reserves the sole discretion to deny or restrict your Service, or immediately to suspend or terminate your Service, if the use of your Service by you or anyone using it, in our sole discretion, violates the Agreement or other Verizon policies, is objectionable or unlawful, interferes with the functioning or use of the Internet or the Verizon network by Verizon or other users, or violates the terms of this Acceptable Use Policy ("AUP").

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:Why they may have done so by Firehed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's none of Verizon's business to enforce usage policies of individual sites. Especially since they don't KNOW the usage policies of individual sites.

      If this is limited to Verizon's own support forums, fine.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    5. Re:Why they may have done so by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you read the whole section, it's a list of examples of what they consider to be violations of Section 1. Someone just got diarrhea of the fingers and started listing all the ways to misbehave online. They even include flaming.

      The takeaway is Verizon is attempting to say that if you act out in any manner whatsoever, do anything they don't like, or just get on the wrong side of one of their IT folk, your service is dead. Overbroad is an understatement. This is them writing a blank check to themselves to allow them to do whatever they want, whenever they want.

      1. General Policy: Verizon reserves the sole discretion to deny or restrict your Service, or immediately to suspend or terminate your Service, if the use of your Service by you or anyone using it, in our sole discretion, violates the Agreement or other Verizon policies, is objectionable or unlawful, interferes with the functioning or use of the Internet or the Verizon network by Verizon or other users, or violates the terms of this Acceptable Use Policy ("AUP").
      2. Specific Examples of AUP Violations. The following are examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your Service. Without limiting the general policy in Section 1, it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to: (a) access without permission or right the accounts or computer systems of others, to spoof the URL, DNS or IP addresses of Verizon or any other entity, or to penetrate the security measures of Verizon or any other person's computer system, or to attempt any of the foregoing; (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities, including without limitation, "spamming", "flaming" or denial of service attacks; (c) intercept, interfere with or redirect email or other transmissions sent by or to others; (d) introduce viruses, worms, harmful code or Trojan horses on the Internet; (e) post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites; (f) engage in conduct that is defamatory, fraudulent, obscene or deceptive; (g) violate Verizon's or any third party's copyright, trademark, proprietary or other intellectual property rights; (h) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network, the Internet generally or other Internet users; (i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic; (j) use the Service to violate any rule, policy or guideline of Verizon; (k) use the service in any fashion for the transmission or dissemination of images containing child pornography or in a manner that is obscene, sexually explicit, cruel or racist in nature or which espouses, promotes or incites bigotry, hatred or racism; or (l) use the Service in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria or any other E:1 Country as designated by the Department of Commerce.

      To cover the fanfic requirement:

      DOOM: Repercussions of Evil

      John Stalvern waited. The lights above him blinked and sparked out of the air. There were demons in the base. He didn't see them, but had expected them now for years. His warnings to Cernel Joson were not listenend to and now it was too late. Far too late for now, anyway.
      John was a space marine for fourteen years. When he was young he watched the spaceships and he said to dad "I want to be on the ships daddy."
      Dad said "No! You will BE KILL BY DEMONS"
      There was a time when he believed him. Then as he got oldered he stopped. But now in the space station base of the UAC he knew there were demons.
      "This is Joson" the radio crackered. "You must fight the demons!"
      So John gotted his palsma rifle and blew up the wall.
      "HE GOING TO KILL US" said the demons
      "I will shoot at him" said the cyberdemon and he fired the rocket missiles. John plasmaed at him and tried to blew him up. But then the ceiling fell and they were trapped and not able to kill.
      "No! I must kill the demons" he shouted
      The radio said "No, John. You are the demons"
      And then John was a zombie.

    6. Re:Why they may have done so by clintonmonk · · Score: 1

      A+

    7. Re:Why they may have done so by elbowboy · · Score: 1

      So how does one violate term L when using a service that requires a fiber optic line be installed by Verizon? "(l) use the Service in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria or any other E:1 Country as designated by the Department of Commerce." That has got to be one long network cable....

  18. Copyright Infringement/Repeat Infringer Policy. by whitedsepdivine · · Score: 0

    you may not store any material or use Verizon's systems or servers in any manner that constitutes an infringement of third party intellectual property rights, including under US copyright law.

    Storing items protected by the DMCA is not against the law. Copying illegally DRM protected items is. I think they got that one confused.

    1. Re:Copyright Infringement/Repeat Infringer Policy. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      you may not store any material or use Verizon's systems or servers in any manner that constitutes an infringement of third party intellectual property rights, including under US copyright law.

      Storing items protected by the DMCA is not against the law. Copying illegally DRM protected items is. I think they got that one confused.

      I think you misread it (emphasis added). An "infringement" is AFAIK anything illegal under IP law. But IANAL, TINLA, YMMV, etc.

      --
      $ make available
  19. This is to be able to cutoff message spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who otherwise have paid up Verizon accounts in good standing.

    They want a legal way to be able to shitcan them.

  20. lol by kevinroyalty · · Score: 1, Redundant

    do i even need to bring up the constitution here? free speech anyone?

    1. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do i even need to bring up the constitution here? free speech anyone?

      Because Verizon doing something with their own network is exactly the same as Congress passing a law?

    2. Re:lol by Saryn · · Score: 1

      More trolls should invoke the first amendment.

    3. Re:lol by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      do i even need to bring up the constitution here? free speech anyone?

      Since it's a corporation, it's not bound by the First Amendment.

      Hey, wait, that means bringing up the Constitution is off topic.

      Very good.

    4. Re:lol by geekoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A commonly held false belief here at /.

      In fact it does apply to them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:lol by PPH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The Constitution doesn't apply to Verizon. Its a private entity*.

      What might apply are the Safe Harbor provisions of the DMCA. If Verizon exercises editorial control over their customers' traffic, they might lose that, exposing them to the liability of their customers' actions. Think 'Deep Pockets'.

      * Why corporations are exempt from provisions of the Constitution is a good question. As they are creations of the State, what rights do the States (or Feds) have to create entities that are not bound by the laws they themselves are bound by? But that's a subject for another discussion and being off-topic here, I run the risk of %^^^@@^^^@&& [NO CARRIER]

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:lol by Kjella · · Score: 1

      A commonly held false belief here at /.

      In fact it does apply to them.

      The point was that corporations aren't the government and aren't obligated to facilitate or provide you with opportunities for free speech in any way. Unless some net neutrality laws are passed, almost anything they put in the ToS is legal based on simply "my lines, my rules". They are granted some constitutional protections, but that's not relevant in this context.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:lol by Firehed · · Score: 1

      If they want to stay a common carrier and don't want to become responsible for what their users do, then yes it is.

      Okay, not *exactly* the same. But close enough that they should know better than to interfere.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    8. Re:lol by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Well, the American government isn't even bound by the Constitution in practice, so I've no idea what that document is even for. And if it is, hell, all you need is the Supreme Court to, like great High Priests or perhaps mystical shamans, decide what really means with a papal infallibility...! So again, what is the document for? I submit it is like Britain's royal family--mostly symbolic.

    9. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe when it comes to private pipes being the only way in to the public internet (since they SHOOT DOWN every attempt at muni access), then hell yes the Constitution should apply. If it doesn't, then stay out of the way when I push for muni wifi access to the internet so that I CAN have a First and Fourth Amendment protected pipe.

      Corporate assholes can't (or rather shouldn't) have it both ways. One or the other.

      And since I'm posting from a FiOS connection, let me give you my off-topic:
      I like boobies. Please ask your mom to show me hers.

    10. Re:lol by raddan · · Score: 1

      Verizon licenses public spectrum and has privileges like right-of-way to lay cable. I don't know the exact repercussions of such things (IANAL), but I suspect that there's some tradeoff there.

  21. Getting back on-topic... by dsavi · · Score: 1
    I found another interesting part of the same document:

    (h) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network, the Internet generally or other Internet users;

    Wouldn't that rule out a whole lot of ISPs and governments?

    1. Re:Getting back on-topic... by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Actually:

      (h) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network, the Internet generally or other Internet users;

      Being on the internet in general does this. Both literally (bandwidth) and figuratively.

    2. Re:Getting back on-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goodbye 4chan.

  22. President Obama to send more troops by runestar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So tonight President Obama is going to announce he's sending more troops into Verizon to help quell the fears that this company is too large to fail.

  23. This is bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the 'hot grits' industry.

  24. Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by ClayJar · · Score: 5, Informative

    "[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"

    They don't even say "unwanted" or some such term. According to the letter of their AUP, discovering an old friend's email address (or Facebook page... whatever people use these days) and sending the friend a message "may lead to termination of your Service". They could replace their entire AUP with an at-will statement and it would be no less unconscionable.

    Of course, cutting off anyone who sends yet another "e-card" might actually be justified, and according to AUP 2.b, they could do it. :)

    Obviously, it's not likely they will enforce the AUP in an egregiously Draconian manner, but I for one would prefer having the outlandish bits *implied* rather than expressly stated. It just looks cleaner. On the other hand, they didn't quite go completely Pythonesque on us:

    Prohibited:
    1. Users named other than "Thomas".
    2. Users named "Thomas".

    1. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by Professional+Slacker · · Score: 1

      What about any outbound TCP connection? Aren't all outbound connections by definition uninvited.

      I'm pretty sure slashdot didn't send me a nice embossed letter say "Please send an HTTP GET request to our fine server at 216.34.181.45 on port 80". Maybe Taco should do that for Verison Customers, hell I'd probably frame something like that.

      --
      A Free Market requires informed intelligent consumers, such people are rare, we're in trouble.
    2. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"

      I'd say this is pretty Pythonesque. I can't send you data until you invite me. Of course, you sending me an invitation is prohibited unless I invited you to do that. But I can't do that unless you invited me first. Etc.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    3. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      By running a server which listens to a port, however, aren't you inviting inbound connections on that port?

      Now, if one were to typo an address and try to connect to a port upon which there was no server listening, then you'd be in for it!

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    4. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by thomasdz · · Score: 1

      Prohibited:
      1. Users named other than "Thomas".
      2. Users named "Thomas".

      Huh? (head explodes)

      --
      Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    5. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by Thinboy00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"

      I'd say this is pretty Pythonesque. I can't send you data until you invite me. Of course, you sending me an invitation is prohibited unless I invited you to do that. But I can't do that unless you invited me first. Etc.

      That just means in theory that VZ customers can't contact each other.

      Of course, in theoretical practice VZ customers can't contact anyone by any reasonable and modern protocol.

      Of course, in practical practice it means VZ can terminate its customers whenever it wants.

      --
      $ make available
    6. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by spidercoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Huh? (head explodes)

      now who the fuck is going to clean that up?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    7. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by bughunter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Obviously, it's not likely they will enforce the AUP in an egregiously Draconian manner, but I for one would prefer having the outlandish bits *implied* rather than expressly stated.

      They don't want it implied. They want it explicit. Because, they want to eliminate their liability.

      Verizon doesn't intend to monitor your internet habits and cut you off if you regale us with stories of hot grits and Natalie Portman. But what they do intend to do is threaten you with disconnection anytime someone complains to them about your behavior. If someone complains to them that you didn't play nice on the internet, they are explicitly reserving the right to terminate your service by specifically including provisions that give them the legal right to disconnect you for anything they can anticipate will evoke complaints. If they receive a complaint that you posted a loldog to a lolcats thread -BOOM- they can d/c you for viloation of the AUP, and don't have to worry about paying a lawyer to defend such heavyhandedness. You have no grounds to litigate -- you violated their AUP.

      In other words, it's there to allow them to protect themselves from third parties, not to actively regulate your behavior as a subscriber.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    8. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by Tibia1 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. Your post was uninvited and deemed a violation.
      Guards.

    9. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by http · · Score: 1

      How is this obvious?

      --
      If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
      3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
    10. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by drdrgivemethenews · · Score: 1

      Also prohibited: groups of all groups that don't contain themselves.

      > Prohibited:
      > 1. Users named other than "Thomas".
      > 2. Users named "Thomas".

    11. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, being able to terminate customers at will is a good thing from a service provider's PoV. At least when you are interested in operations.

      Unfortunately, it doesn't really work that way once you get all the marketing people involved.

    12. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > According to the letter of their AUP... ...they can terminate your service for any reason or none. Consequently, all the examples in the AUP are just that: examples. They could and should reduce the damn thing to a single sentence: "We can terminate service at any time without notice." You, of course, can do likewise.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    13. Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"

      Ok, so it's against AUP to initiate any outbound connections. Gotcha.

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. Something actually on-topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verizon Usenet may not be accessed via any other network. You may open no more than five simultaneous connections to newsgroups at any one time. We reserve the right in our sole discretion, with or without notice to you, to add or subtract Usenet Newsgroups and to modify or restrict the bandwidth available to download content from our Usenet Newsgroup services, or to suspend or terminate our Usenet Newsgroup services (or portions thereof) at any time, with or without notice.

    I don't know how scared I should be that they have clauses in their AUP regarding the Newsgroups. It's the one last bastion of free speech and high bandwidth...

  27. This is why I run Emacs on MacOS by wiredog · · Score: 1, Funny

    Because being a Linux fanboy was too mainstream.

    1. Re:This is why I run Emacs on MacOS by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because being a Linux fanboy was too mainstream.

      Wow, it takes talent to be modded offtopic on an offtopic conversation.

    2. Re:This is why I run Emacs on MacOS by el_tedward · · Score: 0

      mod parent off topic.

    3. Re:This is why I run Emacs on MacOS by michaelwigle · · Score: 1

      ~ROFL~ My thoughts exactly!

  28. Making everyone a criminal is convenient by aaandre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule. Quite convenient. Same with government and the thousands of laws.

    Not every law is applied to everybody, but when anybody becomes inconvenient, there are enough laws to take them out of the picture.

    The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.

    1. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by maxume · · Score: 1

      You left out some retardedness, there are plenty more 's' characters there that you could mindlessly change to '$'.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule. Quite convenient. Same with government and the thousands of laws.

      Yup, my prediction is that criticizing Verizon, posting something about shit that Verizon does, or advising others not to sign up with Verizon will count as "off-topic."

    3. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      So the least corrupt state would be anarchy. Like Somalia.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    4. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.

      Tell me about it. I keep saying UNIFY GRAVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, but nobody will listen. Physicists are so corrupt.

    5. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by BobMcD · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is not a criminal matter, not in the least. Why do people insist on blurring that line?

      Verizon cuts you off and you need to find a new ISP. If you're unable to do so, you might even have some kind of recourse.

      If law enforcement 'cuts you off', you're in prison and finding an ISP is subsequently less important than keeping track of your bar of soap. Not to mention that any shot at the life of an ordinary citizen is completely forfeit.

    6. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule.

      ...which I'm sure they'll rush to do, because with no customers, they'll cut AUP violations to zero.

      The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.

      Was that knee-jerk anarchism or knee-jerk libertarianism? It's so hard to tell sometimes.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    7. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Yes, because that's what companies want to do, disconnect their customers. That's how they make their money, after all.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    8. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't funny with Micro$oft, it's not funny with any other company.

      And at least spell it right, like V€rizon

    9. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by ikefox · · Score: 1

      The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.

      That's only partially correct. The more numerous the laws, the more potential for the abuse of power. A written law does not imply the level of enforcement for itself. Corruption results from improper delegation of power and intransparency of government. Of course, examples of these can be found in the cases of almost every major government in history.

      More laws are the means of corruption, not the cause.

    10. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by irieiam · · Score: 1

      You went from talking about a company AUP to their AUP being law. wtf?

      --
      hmmmm
    11. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      This is not a criminal matter, not in the least. Why do people insist on blurring that line?

      Why do people on slashdot make comparisons to cars?

      It is called an analogy.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw

    13. Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient by FlyMysticalDJ · · Score: 1

      It depends on how you define corrupt. I'd be willing to bet there aren't that many people abusing government made laws to get what they want in Somalia...

  29. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of exhorting everyone to post something off-topic (like someone wouldn't have done it on their own), the summary should have mentioned that this amendment was probably the service's way of disowning trolls, and making it easier to take away their service if someone complains to the telco.

  30. Waste of money on a lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they overpaid for the lawyer who wrote their TOS? Should they continue to waste more money on that and raise customer's prices?

  31. When trolling is outlawed, outlaws will troll by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Classic case of the "open container" law (here in USia) - it gives Verizon an ace in the hole, if they ever need to cut your service for (say) "overuse" - they can sniff your traffic or get an "anonymous" person to complain, and whack your account.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  32. What is an AUP? by Cur8or · · Score: 0

    Can someone please google AUP and tell me what it is?

    --
    Winkey shortcut mapping for 64bit windows. WinKeyPlus
    1. Re:What is an AUP? by oldspewey · · Score: 1
      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:What is an AUP? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. Just slap another shrimp on the barbie, smear it with vegemite, and pull out a big knife.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  33. Restraint Of Free Speech by NormAtHome · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If they actually tried to enforce this wouldn't this just get shot down it court? I was somewhat under the impression that legal agreements i.e. terms of service etc. could not in any way restrict a persons constitutional rights?

    1. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not at all. Otherwise Rob Malda would be arrested for modding me down.

    2. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by JoshuaZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It is more complicated than that. Legal agreements can restrict certain rights that would otherwise be protected. So for example, non-disclosure agreements are legal even though they restrict your speech. However, certain rights cannot be contracted away even by a willing individual. Thus, for example, you can't sell yourself into slavery. IANAL, but these restrictions look like they are within bounds for what can be included in a contract. Remember, stupidity is not necessarily illegal or unconstitutional.

    3. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You are correct that some rights are inalienable.

      However, such is not the case in this situation. For example:

      I may rent my vehicle to you and state that you are ONLY allowed to use this vehicle to drive yourself to the hospital in a medical emergency. You would not be allowed to drive this vehicle to go vote.

      Or I could sell you a cell phone which only calls 911 or the local police station.

      Simply because I am not permitting you to exercise your right through a service does not automatically imply that I am not permitting you from exercising your right at all.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    4. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      It can't, but unfortunately you do not have a constitutional right to use Comcast's equipment to post what you want against their will--even if you're willing to pay for it. Your constitutional right to free speech is a right not to be censored by government edict. And that's it. Who in the world modded this "Insightful"?

      And oh, yeah: When was the last time you had a really, REALLY good bagel?

    5. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't very good analogies, as they would only map to very specific Internet-based services rather than an ISP. Better analogies would be "I'll rent you this car but you can't drive it on roads with R in their name" or "I'll sell you cellphone service but you can't talk about dogs on the phone". Things get a lot murkier there, especially since these rules are being applied to existing customers who didn't see them upfront.

    6. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by sofar · · Score: 0

      Actually that's totally untrue. You NEVER give up your constitutional rights. No contract or agreement can also take them away.

    7. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Actually, the moment they change the terms of service, the original contract is NULL and VOID. They changed the terms, now you can re-negotiate the payment.

      Just send them a email saying "I accept the New AUP terms and agree to adjust my payment to $0 immediately for the duration of this change in service level. Receiving this email constitutes acceptance of the new terms by both parties."

      If they can change the terms arbitrarily, then so can you. Make it hurt. Stupid should hurt.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually quite rare for a particular "right" or freedom to be protected from legal forfeiture or constraint. In fact, in order for a contract to be considered valid, it must have "consideration" (among other things). In a legal setting, consideration is something of some value being exchanged between the parties, though "value" in this setting does not mean money. In many circumstances, the "value" of one party is either an agreement to participate in an activity that they are not otherwise obligated to do, or to abstain from participating in an activity that they are not otherwise prohibited from doing (for example, it's not legal consideration to agree not to assault someone, since that is already illegal, so you have a legal obligation to refrain from doing doing that; likewise, promising to fulfill the terms of another agreement to which you're already obligated would not constitute consideration).

      The "consideration" for your legal contract with Verizon or Comcast or any other provider is not limited to the monies that you pay them each month, your agreement to abide by the terms in their subscriber agreement is also part of that consideration.

      As an aside, the example given of being unable to sell yourself into slavery is built on the idea that such a contract would lack consideration (since if you're receiving compensation of any kind then you are not a slave). This is further borne out in the courts' hesitance to mandate specific performance for a breach of contract (specific performance is a court order to fulfill the terms of a contract rather than pay damages), meaning that if you have a service agreement with someone, then the court is far more likely to direct you to pay the other party monetary damages instead of requiring you to fulfill your agreement.

    9. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      -1 Not insightful.

      Verizon would simply reply, "We do not accept the new terms for $0.00 payment. Contract voided and service discontinued."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Not insightful.

      No, it's -1 Incorrect. A comment can be both insightful and wrong.

    11. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by Morkano · · Score: 1

      Actually, the moment they change the terms of service, the original contract is NULL and VOID. They changed the terms, now you can re-negotiate the payment.

      Just send them a email saying "I accept the New AUP terms and agree to adjust my payment to $0 immediately for the duration of this change in service level. Receiving this email constitutes acceptance of the new terms by both parties."

      If they can change the terms arbitrarily, then so can you. Make it hurt. Stupid should hurt.

      Of course, then they'll just disconnect you for "uninvited" communications.

      "[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"

      --
      Victory or awesome!
    12. Re:Restraint Of Free Speech by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      Since it is a common carrier, constitutional rights should apply even though it is private property. Other course cases have shown that protests are protected on private property in privately owned planned communities where the private sidewalk is the functional equivalent of a public sidewalk. I think similar principles apply here.

  34. Missing the Point!!!!! by ogar572 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The point is not if Cpt Caveman can make a good burger using moose meat, its whether or not Modern Warfare 2 should be made to be played on my nieces Elmo learning computer while listening to Oingo Boingo. I wish everyone would take time and truly understand what the article is talking about.

  35. The internet police are here by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Watch out, the Verizon Internet Police will put a stop to your trolling efforts!

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  36. Sieges Even by Sirusjr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So have you guys heard the music of a group called Sieges Even? Great progressive rock, and they say they don't make good music anymore these days.

  37. I want me some by geekoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    petrified Natalie Portland with hot grits.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. So, how about those Saints? by bfwebster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Kicked New England's butt, they did. ..bruce..

    --
    Bruce F. Webster (brucefwebster.com)
  39. I love sailing by pavera · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sailing is a really great sport and you guys should all try it! Speaking of which, anyone have a 1990 or newer Hobie Cat 16 for sale? Preferably in the western US?

  40. Oh wow, they are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add 3 tablespoons sugar and simmer for 15 minutes over a low flame.

  41. FiOS AUP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is a FiOS AUP, and what are the examples that we're all familiar with?

    1. Re:FiOS AUP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to the "AU" in it, I thought it had something to do with Australia...or gold.

  42. Odd by autocracy · · Score: 1

    That shows up as the first on-topic post... too bad it was cut short. Is that the "Don't rub our noses in our shit," clause of their new AUP?

    --
    SIG: HUP
  43. Re:Offtopic? by chaboud · · Score: 1

    Yes.

    Wait...

    Crap!

  44. I'm calling Verizon on ALL OF YOU!!! by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 2, Funny

    How DARE you break the terms of your agreement! Have we stooped so low? What next? Downloading of Movies, Music, etc?

    1. Re:I'm calling Verizon on ALL OF YOU!!! by Ghubi · · Score: 1

      Speaking of downloading, I suspect enforcement of these terms will be targeted at high bandwidth users.

  45. Verizon differs from Comcast ... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could have put up with Comcast when it assimilated my local cable franchise. I could have put up with it when it shifted out half a dozen channels on the excuse of they would still be available 'in digital' (for extra $$). But when it was decreed that the Sci-Fi Network would be the Syfy Channel -- well, that made me decide to give up Comcast for a honking big antenna.

    No, Verizon does not serve my area. Not that it makes a difference. Given its AUP, I still would have gone with DSL and an aerial.

    1. Re:Verizon differs from Comcast ... how? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      If Verizon were available in your area, it would've been Verizon DSL.

      So, make that dial-up (satellite's just as bad on the AUP) and an aerial.

      Or, shell out hundreds a month for a DS3.

  46. AUP by mugnyte · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sweet potatoes seem to be the best food ever made. Any way they are prepared, and my mouth is in love from the first taste.

      I'm not sure how I feel about Biofeedback Therapy. It's kinda spooky.

      When will they upgrade these tired outdated office phones? Given that so few people use them any more, perhaps we'll just unplug them and never notice.

  47. Anti-jerk rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a catch-all that will only get enforced when they need to boot someone who's really breaking a lot of etiquette rules but they haven't actually broke a law. It's a pretty common form of "anti-jerk rule", sorta like a school that can't fail you for attending, but they can fail you for not participating, and you can't participate if you're not there...

  48. Normal Slashdot Troll Spam by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the most of the normal troll spam by bots on Slashdot are on FiOS.

    Say, why aren't the posting here?

    I couldn't find any more examples, but would like more here.

    1. Re:Normal Slashdot Troll Spam by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure Taco would endorse complaining to their isps, and I'm not sure anyone else (other than /. admins, not just Taco, all of them) have much ability to trace anonymous comments.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Normal Slashdot Troll Spam by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to see links to a bunch of the old ones in reply. Something like a troll summary.

  49. Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    So they can say "no black customers", right? (No.)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that violates the civil rights act of 1964. In theory, the civil rights act of 1964 violates the 4th amendment, but hey, who needs dusty old laws anyway?

    2. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by Late+Adopter · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Constitution only prevents that in government actions. What prevents private discrimination of recognized classes is primarily the Civil Rights Acts of 1964.

    3. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe that is a Constitutional matter (not *entirely* positive about that, though).

      My understanding is, the Constitution defines the structure of the Federal government, and places limits on the powers of the Federal and State governments. *Laws* then, based upon the powers granted to the Congress, State Legislatures, and local government bodies, act upon individuals and businesses.

      So, you can't say "no black customers" because Federal Law, I believe, passed by Congress, signed by the President, has made that illegal, NOT the Constitution. Again, as the GP stated, generally speaking, when discussing what private entities (people, corporations, non-profit foundations, etc) can and cannot do, it's generally not true that the Constitution has anything to say about it.

      Someone might bring up a case like Brown vs. Board of Education, where the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, but, I believe, in that case, the Constitution was applied because what was at issue were public, government funded and run schools.

    4. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Thats not because of the constitution, thats because of anti-discrimination laws.

    5. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by yohaas · · Score: 1

      How does the Civil Rights Act violate the constitutional ban on illegal search an seizures?

    6. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      So they can say "no black customers", right? (No.)

      Unless they decide they are a private club, rather than a public entity. Then 'Yes'.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

    7. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The constitution doesn't protect against racial discrimination.

    8. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't, but not because of the Constitution. Federal laws passed prevent corporations from discriminating on the basis of race. The Constitution couldn't care less, and in fact proscribes for black people to be considered only 3/5ths equivalent to white.

    9. Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when are internet trolls a recognized class?

  50. Re:Offtopic? by lavacano201014 · · Score: 1

    Way I'm seeing it, there is no true off-topic in this particular article.

    If you discuss Verizon's anti-off-topic-ness, you're on topic, but if you start discussing what kind of cheese you like in your macaroni or something, by being OFF-TOPIC, you're ON-TOPIC. If that makes any sense.

    --
    A wise man once said, "Where is my other quotation mark?
  51. I have a dream... by singingjim1 · · Score: 0

    That somehow, someway, we are able to take back our personal freedoms from over-reaching EULAs. I mean really, my account will be canceled if I post an off topic remark on a friend's Facebook page? Not that I have any friends really, but I blame that on my parents divorce. My mom was really overbearing and I think that not being able to truly express myself for fear of ridicule by my family had a real impact on my social development. But that's a thread for another Web site...what were we talking about again?

  52. Err.. no. by Fished · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IANAL. I don't even play one on TV. However, your "constitutional rights" are a list of things that the government may not do to you. While there might be some legal angle based on Verizon's status as a common carrier, public utility, etc., generally speaking a private company has no obligation to enable your freedom of speech. Think about it... does a newspaper have to print your letter to the editor? No. Same deal here.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:Err.. no. by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      The common carrier/public utility thing is what bothers me.

      I can't go and run my own fibre around the neighborhood because Verizon and Time Warner have exclusive deals with the city. Personally, I think they should be considered agents of the government and subject to the same restrictions. I'm not sure where the courts would come in on this.

      Also, aren't they getting into a fight they don't want to get involved in? The argument being, if they have the ability to monitor forums then they have the ability to monitor any other illegal activities going on.

    2. Re:Err.. no. by chebucto · · Score: 1

      Well, you could go back to having regulated monopolies. Wasn't the phone service well-run and replete with legal protections back in the days of Ma Bell?

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    3. Re:Err.. no. by Nyall · · Score: 1

      generally speaking a private company has no obligation to enable your freedom of speech.

      I'll agree with that statement in general, but this situation is a company going out of their way to disable your freedom of speech.

      Also I wonder if this is "materially adverse" enough for someone to get out of a contract without early termination fees.

      p.s. I detest bananas.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    4. Re:Err.. no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have just said IANALIDEPOOTV and saved me a bunch of time.

    5. Re:Err.. no. by tomtomtom · · Score: 1

      IANAL either and while this is all very true, I think there is a good chance that these terms are so broad that they may well fall foul of local "unfair consumer contract terms" type legislation. Not sure what the situation is in the US, but I would be surprised if some of those were held enforceable against consumers in the UK, for example. Not that that would help you a great deal, since your redress would just be to turn around and sue them for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a relatively small monetary amount of damages.

      The only way I can see this might get more legally interesting is if they try to use these terms to act against some kind of "speciallhy protected" speech (e.g. arguing in favour of disabled, women's or minority rights). And even then it's probably more of a political problem for them than a legal one I suspect.

    6. Re:Err.. no. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe have the local governments own and maintain the lines, with equal access to any company that wants it for actually providing service?

  53. Twab Andalucia ferrroouuu! by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

    Cormorants are often disturbed by instantiated flailing humbled. Flail, flail, with the dying of the crepuscule. "Undoubtedly," Miriale remarked, "for if it were not so, how would anyone surrender their sllllllll?"

  54. I'm not using Verizon, so I can be an ass! by LikwidCirkel · · Score: 1

    I'm not bound by their rules. Without their guidance and enforced good morals, I'm going to harm all of you by calling you douches to hurt your feelings. Hopefully, the massive amount of hurt feelings from this post will cause a ripple effect across the continent, resulting in the biggest Internet flamewar of our era. We should all be thanking Verizon for taking a stand against assholes like me.

    1. Re:I'm not using Verizon, so I can be an ass! by crazycheetah · · Score: 1

      Shit! Teens are going to be hanging themselves in their basement in great numbers! And the court's going to be all full of cyber-bully cases. SHIT!

      That's it. I quit the

  55. Chickens by jag7720 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Did you see those chickens?

  56. Definitely can be used to censor. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    In my experience online, particularly with internet forums featuring heavy political debate (or more accurately put, "argumentation"), rules like "no off-topic posting" can easily be twisted or broadened to accompany the biases of the moderators or the majority opinion to stifle dissent.

    How? For example, someone who has a completely opposite opinion of the majority may often have a completely opposing ideology and thus their opposition may be seen as "trolling." I'll use examples from the supposed "both sides" (yes, this is a gross simplification of political ideologies but bear with me), i.e., the left and the right on the political spectrum. It is frequently seen as off-topic trolling to the left when they are discussing what the proper amount of taxation should be and a libertarian or conservative come in railing against ALL taxation on principle, since the tone of discussion itself was not the validity of taxation but "just the right" amount. Of course, to many libertarians and conservatives, there is no "right amount," but it's seen as disruption and trolling all the same.

    Similarly for the right, when the left criticize religiously-based policies it is often seen as rambling on about un-American stuff, and since they are talking about AMERICA! they really ought go someplace else (usually Cuba) to discuss that sort of thing. And then they're banned.

    I've seen the same thing with "don't be rude" rules. Tell someone that a particular belief they have is racist, and on some forums you will get punished for insulting, nevermind the fact that some wackjobs people out there proudly call themselves racists (and if you intend to have free, open discussion, you'll have to remain neutral to both sides and favor neither) and nevermind the fact that by some definitions their views can be considered racist. For example (trying to remain unbiased towards "both" sides of the fence here, again), you can sometimes be punished for claiming that someone is a racist for affirmative action, or can be punished for saying that someone is racist for supporting Israel's status as an officially Jewish state. Of course, just being contradictory enough times, particularly towards deeply-established social norms and views is seen as disruptive and can also get you kicked from forums for "being a jerk."

    This is similar to how the media marginalizes minority viewpoints in politics, by not televising them, referring to them as "spoilers" as if the votes really belong to the Big Two, treating them as sideshow attractions, and generally holding them in contempt--this applies to the Libertarians AND the left-wing parties such as the Green Party.

    Conformity rules everywhere, even in places that supposedly pride themselves on having open discussion and unbiased moderation. Consensus will eventually appear and if a voice is too contradictory they'll be seen not as a contributing member but as a disruptive element. The only solution I can see for truly "free" discussion online (and I am not implying that all forums should have "free" discussion, simply ones that aim to) is to require members to have a bit of backbone and a lot of leeway on what is appropriate.

    1. Re:Definitely can be used to censor. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      If you need a tl;dr example, just big a view that is so abhorrent to you that it you consider it offensive by default. I'll pick on neo-nazis bigots here. Almost no forum seriously allows neo-nazi punks to spread their bullshit because it's racially offensive. But they do so at the expense of "free" discussion (again, not saying all discussion must be "free"), and when you start taking any side based on how offensive the view is, you slant the discourse by default.

      Of course, most ISP ToSes do not allow you to spread racism on the internet in the first place, although it's rarely enforced. But that is beside the point here.

      This is just a blatant, extreme example, but if you look closely you can find this effect occurring more subtly on forums towards minority viewpoints.

    2. Re:Definitely can be used to censor. by maxume · · Score: 1

      I bet you use Windows.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Definitely can be used to censor. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      I laughed.

  57. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by Firehed · · Score: 1

    Wait - they're trying to ban porn?

    Good luck with that, guys.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  58. Re:Offtopic? by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

    The short answer to your question?: Han shot first.

    --
    "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
  59. cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when your dad found a cloud my computer crashed

  60. To all of you offtopiccers! by sopssa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm on Verizon and cannot join the discussion, you insensitive clods!

    1. Re:To all of you offtopiccers! by snspdaarf · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Why? Are you in one of these places?

      [it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to]use the Service in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    2. Re:To all of you offtopiccers! by oldspewey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Shit, and I was planning on subscribing to Verizon FIOS here in Pyongyang.

      That AUP clause totally foils my plans

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:To all of you offtopiccers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider your comment inflammatory. The authorities have been notified.

    4. Re:To all of you offtopiccers! by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

      I'm on Verizon too, I feel your pain.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  61. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by oldspewey · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't worry about it too much. Verizon uses the Japanese definition of obscene and sexually explicit, so very few kinds of porn are actually in violation of the AUP.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  62. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by Grax · · Score: 1

    Pictures of Verizon Executives in compromising positions is automatically a violation of the AUP.

  63. My mature reasoned response! by jocabergs · · Score: 1

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris consequat velit ut turpis lobortis tempor nec at metus. Donec rutrum egestas justo, non viverra tortor rutrum ac. Nam a magna id magna placerat dignissim non eget purus. Morbi ut velit erat, nec dapibus nisi. Nunc in libero arcu. Maecenas ut erat eu tortor dapibus rutrum in sit amet magna. Phasellus ultrices porta congue. Fusce nec quam diam, ut bibendum orci. Sed vulputate vestibulum egestas. Aliquam a ipsum id massa cursus interdum eu nec dolor. Nullam viverra ullamcorper nisl, vitae ultrices diam facilisis eleifend. Vivamus mauris justo, sagittis a varius vitae, viverra at turpis. Nulla facilisi. Ut egestas justo vitae massa iaculis convallis. Donec et nulla a erat aliquet dignissim. In turpis nibh, rhoncus nec sollicitudin vitae, convallis et lacus. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Donec semper, orci sit amet rutrum cursus, arcu libero ultrices massa, mattis hendrerit velit justo id risus. Sed eu mattis enim. //hehe

  64. Oopsie by rindeee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What Verizon (Comcast, and others) are going to learn the hard way is the liability that comes along with this. IANAL, but, from experience I understand that if you specifically say something is prohibited, but then do not enforce prohibition of it and someone causes harm to another where it would have been precluded had you enforced the prohibition of said activity, guess who's liable. :)

    1. Re:Oopsie by 4pins · · Score: 1

      The person who committed the act and the complacent party?

      --
      I will not mourn that which I never had to lose. - Unknown
    2. Re:Oopsie by cynyr · · Score: 1

      sorrta but i could see a case to be made that verison made a "promise" to prevent this sort of behavior, anything that slips though is then their fault. as they failed to prevent the rule from being broken. Granted i'd like to see someone actully enforce this one. on that note;

      I LOVE PONIES!!!

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  65. Socrates and Plato by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Two old Greek guys and three Romans are sitting at a bakery drinking coffee and eating kabobs when Socrates and Plato walk by discussing the nature of "The State".

    The first old Greek guys comments to Socrates "You know I once read a book that said a soverign rules by divine mandate."

    Socrates smacks him across the face and pisses in his coffee. "YOu have been modded -1 Offtopic.

    His second friend gets up intent on beating the remaining piss out of Socrates but Plato does a "Solar Flare Tsunami" blast to his face.

    The three remaining Romans go to Plato and ask, "Why did you do such horrible things when they mearly wanted to comment on "The State" and join your discussion?"

    Socrates whispered in reply, "We were talking about the state of Mrs. Plato's assets, not the government and off-topic discussion must BE PUNISHED!"

    Which at that point Socrates and Plato performed the fusion dance and obliterated Atlantis just to show how serious they were about moderating off-topic discussion when a passing Spartan kicked them both off a cliff stating, "This Is Not SPARTA!"

    Fin

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  66. so there can be -1 offtopic to this article right? by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Slashdot -1, Offtopic moderation to be changed to: -1 Offtopic (disconnect author from internet)

    Frankly, Verizon has gotten it wrong though. They should be disconnecting trolls... OTOH.. maybe they are trolls :)

    From UUnet.. historical biggest spam haven ever... to 2009 keeping a clean ship, don't even think of posting an off-topic web page...

    Any anti-verizon web pages, or postings are by definition off-topic (even if Verizon is the subject of the discussion).

  67. Would it be off topic -- by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

    -- for me to bitch and moan about how Verizon FiOS lines cover all the streets around my apartment complex, but, due to a Verizon f*ck up on the property years ago (which caused a couple thousand in damage to a drain and structures around it) that my apartment complex *will not* allow Verizon on the property to bring the FiOS lines to the various apartment buildings.

    I say, screw them!

  68. So... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    How many memories does it take to install Windows 95 to my motherboard?

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:So... by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

      However many are left while drunk.

  69. Canter & Siegle would protest these term by KJSwartz · · Score: 1

    'Nuf said?

    1. Re:Canter & Siegle would protest these term by DynamoJoe · · Score: 1

      Professor Peabody called. He wants the Way-Back machine returned with a full tank this time.

      --
      bah.
  70. :-D by owyn999 · · Score: 1

    Come join my new social network at www.verizon.net/aupsucks/socialnetworking/

    ------------------

    couldn't help m'self

    --
    Where's that cap to the Decanter of Endless water???
  71. Time is cubic, you fools, cubic! by afallowhorizon · · Score: 1

    I have demonstrated absolute irrefutable proof of 4 simultaneous 24 hour days with in a single rotation of Earth. No other man or god can claim such Truth manifestation. The academic brainwashed mind is corrupt and can't comprehend Cubic magnificence. Word teachers are the most evil humans. Religious academia represses the human mind of the Cubic Truth - not utterable. Educators and teachers, ignorant of the Time Cube Principle, are evil liars and unfit to live in Earth's Garden of Eden.

    1. Re:Time is cubic, you fools, cubic! by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      This post does not have nearly enough blinking/underlined/multicolored words in all caps to be believable.

    2. Re:Time is cubic, you fools, cubic! by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      And Nic Cage once again ruined it with his terrible acting. Someone should get him a decent haircut.

  72. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        Fucking Verizon wants to take away my off topic midget porn?

        What if a guy just wants to sit at home, and jerk off looking at a midget chick get fucked by a horse, huh? Is there really something wrong with that? Not to say that I'd want to. I'm more into the look of girls from the Robert Palmer music videos. But hey, to each his own, right?

        Motherfuckers.

        Or more precisely, in the infamous words of the late great George Carlin...

        "shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker and tits."

        Tits? really? Not boobies, honkers, headlights, gazoongas, fun bubbles, fun bags, honkers, hooters, jugs, or melons.

        Go ahead, add your titty words in response. :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  73. Hate to break it to ya.... by kaizendojo · · Score: 1
    but that wasn't the "change"; in fact that clause has been there for a while. The only change on 11/30 was

    "If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to your location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will not have to pay an Early Termination Fee."

    Sorry to piss on your misplaced outrage, but there's no story here - nor is it censorship.

    1. Re:Hate to break it to ya.... by putch · · Score: 1

      yeah, i got that notice too. i'm a little disappointed. I was hoping to pay them extra if/when they decided to stop providing my area with service.

      --
      just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  74. We're no strangers to love... by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

    You know the rules, and so do I.

    --
    If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    1. Re:We're no strangers to love... by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      THE GAME

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
  75. Contact Verizon and let them know you disapprove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send e-mail to volhelp@verizon.net

    I sent them this:

    Dear Verizon,
    Your Policy here:

    https://www.verizon.net/central/vzc.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=vzc_help_policies&id=AcceptableUse

    Contains the clause:

    "The following are examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your Service. Without limiting the general policy in Section 1, it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to: ... (e) post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites;"

    Due to the addition of this clause, I can no longer recommend Verizon services, and I have decided not to become a customer of Verizon until this clause is removed.

  76. Verizon Killed My Dog! by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Verizon killed my tree when installing their FIOS lines outside my house. That caused my dog to go nuts because that's the tree he peed on. He eventually died of bladder failure.

    Verizon owes me another dog.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  77. I like to tape my thumbs to my hands by kindbud · · Score: 0, Redundant

    To see what it would be like to be a dinosaur.

    I also like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  78. HUH??? by fibrewire · · Score: 1

    Ya know when a person gets a new car or buys a new house, the dealer or broker takes a loan out in that person's name for the full price. so if i'm a dealer, then i get a fat check from the bank for like $30,000 to $50,000 to $200k for a house. You know that a "Verizon 2 Year Service Agreement" is the same thing? That they get a check for nearly $2,000 when you sign up for fios? Is this True? Then the day they terminate the agreement, they charge you an early termination fee? So that they can pay their accounting guys to tie up the loose ends?

  79. The Last Starfighter rulz by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    It's all about The Last Starfighter, old trailer parks and and aliens that look like lizards.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:The Last Starfighter rulz by MooUK · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched that in decades (or at least one).

  80. Who Hires the Watchers? by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

    Which will explain the sudden surge in Verizon's Now Hiring page, no doubt. See? Wholesale invasion of privacy is good for the economy.

    After all, recognizing flames, spam, offtopic, etc. can't be automated, otherwise Slashdot's moderation system would only have one option: Like.
    (Yes I just connected Verizon with the devolution of /. into facebook. Please exercise your anti-corporate rage appropriately.)

  81. wow by thehostiles · · Score: 1

    give this article an award for most offtopic messages. also, I just watched that "christian side hug" video... cool beans

  82. "Transmission" of porn and racism banned too by mi · · Score: 1

    Part 2., item (k):

    (k) use the service in any fashion for the transmission or dissemination of images containing child pornography or in a manner that is obscene, sexually explicit, cruel or racist in nature or which espouses, promotes or incites bigotry, hatred or racism

    By a mere visit to a porn site — or whatever site is deemed to be "inciting bigotry" — the site's material gets "transmitted" from the site to your computer. Ergo, you can not even visit such sites... E-mailing someone a picture of your butt or a note, that you hate green-skinned Martians, is also against the policy...

    Here is the transcript of my "Live Chat" with a Verizon support person — "Drew" gets clearly confused and, to avoid the tough questions above even his manager's pay-grade tries to redirect me to a "local Verizon business office":

    • We are routing you to a chat representative. Thank you for contacting Verizon. Your average wait time is 52 seconds. You are now chatting with 'Drew'
    • Drew: Hello. Thank you for visiting our Verizon chat service. How can I help you set up your new service and save with a Verizon bundle?
    • Mike: Hi! I have a question about the FiOS Acceptable Use Policy:
    • Mike: https://www.verizon.net/central/vzc.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=vzc_help_policies&id=AcceptableUse
    • Mike: In particular, the item (k) of the part 2.
    • Mike: Does it mean, that even VISITING pornographic or racist web-sites is against the policy?
    • Mike: Because, if I visit such a site, there will be a "transmission" of their material -- from the site to my computer...
    • Drew: Please give me few moments.
    • Drew: There are some sites , which are not authorized by Verizon and our technician will come at your location to guide you.
    • Mike: So, you are confirming, that merely VISITING certain -- pornographic or political -- sites is against the policy?
    • Drew: Just visiting is not against the policy.
    • Mike: So, what did you mean, "some sites , which are not authorized by Verizon"? What does it mean: "not authorized"? Does it mean, I can not visit them?
    • Mike: Drew, are you there?
    • Drew: Some sites are restricted by govt and you will not be able to visit.
    • Mike: Well, of course, if the Government restricts them, I will not visit them. But that's the question of Law, not AUP...
    • Mike: So, you assure me, that simply VISITING any site -- even if pornographic or racist -- that's not already banned by the Government, will NOT be a violation of Verizon's Acceptable Use Policy?
    • Drew: Only visisting such sites is not restricted and you can just visit.
    • Mike: Will Verizon update the Policy's text? As currently worded, ANY transmission of such material seems against the policy -- even if it is simply in the course of a visit to the site...
    • Mike: Also, can I use the service to E-MAIL someone a racist (or ranchy) material? That's also "transmission"?.. :-(
    • Drew: Transmission may be against the law and for further information , I will suggest you to call the local office.
    • Drew: Would you like me to provide you a number to call local Verizon business office?
    • Mike: I'm not asking about the Law. I'm asking about Verizon's policy... Is the policy set by the LOCAL business offices?
    • Drew: Yes, it is set by Verizon company. Which is following government rules and regulations.
    • Mike: You represent Verizon company. Why would the LOCAL office be able to answer a question, that you can not?
    • Drew: I understand your concern. As we are in sales department we do not have information on it. That's the reason, I am giving you the number to call.
    • Drew: You can talk with our marketing department overthere and they will guide about it.
    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:"Transmission" of porn and racism banned too by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      That statement bans child porn (which is likely illegal in their service areas anyway) and racism. It doesn't ban porn in general, which much to most peoples surprise is illegal in many areas as well. I live in NC and pretty much every porn site on the Internet is illegal to visit, regardless of Verizon's policies. Whats better is it IS perfectly legal for me to go to a titty bar.

      Most states have rather out dated laws that are roughly the same, although never actually enforced. They are handy to have around when some douche bag does something there isn't actually a law against but is clearly 'wrong'. You'd be amazed at the number of criminals that are put in jail for things other than what you'd like them to go to jail for. Many criminals are often good at not breaking the laws related to what they are doing, but still tend to get caught because they didn't cover ALL their bases. Just ask Mr Capone.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:"Transmission" of porn and racism banned too by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      our technician will come at your location to guide you.



      Sounds messy, and they're worried about US offending people? make sure he cleans up after himself when he's done...
    3. Re:"Transmission" of porn and racism banned too by mi · · Score: 1

      That statement bans child porn (which is likely illegal in their service areas anyway) and racism.

      Ok, child porn is already illegal, but racism is not. For a business to ban it is wrong, if only because one's "racism" is another's "dissent". This is far more important, actually, than any limits on porn, because as long as we can discuss banned material, we are free to change the banning laws. This is what sets us apart from China's tyranny — we may not be able to view child porn, but we can argue, whether such prohibitions should be in place. Chinese, on the other hand, can not even discuss relative merits of alternative forms of government.

      By banning "racism" and "bigotry" we get much closer to the same tyranny: notice, how most critics of our current President are claimed by at least some of his supporters to be "racists". To avoid "controversy" and to please the Administration (who can really hurt them through FCC), Verizon may decide to disconnect such racists — perhaps even "sending a technicians to guide you"...

      But my — and that Drew's from Verizon — reading of the AUP is not limited to "child" porn. Any transmission that is "obscene" or "sexually explicit" is against the policy, even if it depicts happily screwing adults. Will using a curse-word make your e-mails "obscene" (even if not "sexually explicit")? You betcha!..

      I live in NC and pretty much every porn site on the Internet is illegal to visit

      That's government for you...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  83. FIRST!!!!!!111!onety-eleven! by DamonHD · · Score: 1

    FRIST!

    (I'm not a Verizon customer...)

    Rgds

    Damon

    --
    http://m.earth.org.uk/
  84. I have a gripe about FiOS... by melted+keyboard · · Score: 1

    [Censored by FiOS AUP]

  85. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but you apparently failed to notice that the Bill of Rights refers to the Government, not individual corporations. Last I checked, Verizon wasn't part of the Government.

    All that means is that on Government owned property (official buildings, public areas, etc) one can say what they want when they want. The second you move onto private property (someone's lawn, a business room, anything not directly owned by the Government), you become subject to another party's restrictions.

    People refer to the First Amendment constantly, thinking it applies to everything. It does not. Unless Verizon is guilty of some form of discrimination in the United States for which there is a United States law concerning, they can do whatever they want with their service. If you don't like it, you can go somewhere else.

  86. Wait, what? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    People read those things?

  87. so i'm sitting here wondering by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

    what exactly is a "rick roll?"

    --
    sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
  88. FiOS is hardly a right by Tanman · · Score: 1

    Court would not shoot this down. Not only is FiOS not required to post your free speech, but it is actually a luxury option for doing so. If you can prove that FiOS is the only option for online access, then *maybe* you'd have something. Instead, you got nothin.

  89. Nope -- offtopic is ON TOPIC by redelm · · Score: 1

    ... and just maybe: on-topic is off topic ?!?

    1. Re:Nope -- offtopic is ON TOPIC by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Ever notice how repeating a word makes it sound like a word you've never heard? Topic topic topic topic topic. This comment has been topic-adjacent to avoid the on-topic/off-topic conundrum. Topic.

  90. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    There's no logical disconnect here. What you're missing is the intent. They want to be able to bar you from their service when you do things to attract their attention. They recognize there are legal issues to doing so. Therefore, the rules are abigious enough to keep them out of court.

    Quite logical, really.

    The biggest disconnect I see here is your comparing a basis of government to a list of excuses for terminating a contract.

  91. I am the MAN! by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Woo hoo!

    1. Re:I am the MAN! by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      your mom's the man

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    2. Re:I am the MAN! by fregaham · · Score: 1

      your mom's the man

      No he isn't.

  92. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

    Verizon is not Congress. I hope that helps clear up some of your confusion... or was that an off topic joke mixed in with a serious post?

    The second part of your post I agree with. Rules like that are unclear, not to mention a really bad business decision to actually enforce.

  93. Re:Marked Offtopic? by bipbop · · Score: 1

    Ahh, they're just getting confused. They mean to mark it +1 Offtopic, but due to a bug on Slashdot, the polarity of the neutron flow got reversed.

  94. Verizon FIOS has usenet/newsgroup? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I thought Verizon dropped it a while ago. Is it any good? Do they use outsource NSP like Giganews?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  95. All I have to say is: by Facegarden · · Score: 1

    OHN, by the grace of God King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, Greeting.

    KNOW THAT BEFORE GOD, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household, Brother Aymeric master of the knighthood of the Temple in England, William Marshal earl of Pembroke, William earl of Salisbury, William earl of Warren, William earl of Arundel, Alan de Galloway constable of Scotland, Warin Fitz Gerald, Peter Fitz Herbert, Hubert de Burgh seneschal of Poitou, Hugh de Neville, Matthew Fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip Daubeny, Robert de Roppeley, John Marshal, John Fitz Hugh, and other loyal subjects:

    + (1) FIRST, THAT WE HAVE GRANTED TO GOD, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired. That we wish this so to be observed, appears from the fact that of our own free will, before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons, we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church's elections - a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it - and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III. This freedom we shall observe ourselves, and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity.

    TO ALL FREE MEN OF OUR KINGDOM we have also granted, for us and our heirs for ever, all the liberties written out below, to have and to keep for them and their heirs, of us and our heirs:

    (2) If any earl, baron, or other person that holds lands directly of the Crown, for military service, shall die, and at his death his heir shall be of full age and owe a `relief', the heir shall have his inheritance on payment of the ancient scale of `relief'. That is to say, the heir or heirs of an earl shall pay £100 for the entire earl's barony, the heir or heirs of a knight l00s. at most for the entire knight's `fee', and any man that owes less shall pay less, in accordance with the ancient usage of `fees'

    (3) But if the heir of such a person is under age and a ward, when he comes of age he shall have his inheritance without `relief' or fine.

    (4) The guardian of the land of an heir who is under age shall take from it only reasonable revenues, customary dues, and feudal services. He shall do this without destruction or damage to men or property. If we have given the guardianship of the land to a sheriff, or to any person answerable to us for the revenues, and he commits destruction or damage, we will exact compensation from him, and the land shall be entrusted to two worthy and prudent men of the same `fee', who shall be answerable to us for the revenues, or to the person to whom we have assigned them. If we have given or sold to anyone the guardianship of such land, and he causes destruction or damage, he shall lose the guardianship of it, and it shall be handed over to two worthy and prudent men of the same `fee', who shall be similarly answerable to us.

    (5) For so long as a guardian has guardianship of such land, he shall maintain the houses, parks, fish preserves, ponds, mills, and everything else pertaining to it, from the revenues of the land itself. When the heir comes of age, he shall restore the whole land to him, stocked with plough teams and such implements of husbandry as t

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    1. Re:All I have to say is: by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Ooops, that is supposed to start with "John". That's what I get for using copy and paste.

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
  96. Confusion Norm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a former Vz Employee at a Fiber Solutions Center, I CAN tell you that except for the fact of plunging into FTTH, Vz corporate usually seems to be .... oh, wait, I'm using Verizon. nevermind ( -:

  97. Don't use it in North Korea, Syria. . .etc by or-switch · · Score: 1

    I like the part of the TOS that says you can't use it in North Korea, Syria, or other major/minor axis-of-evil participants. Good luck given the rollout has been so small that I can't use FIOS in San Francisco or Silicon Valley of all places.

  98. Cheese and lemons are good for your bunons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My cat is a carrot again. Please release all the birds so the car can run again. Larry doesn't like onions or battleships on his burger. YES I CAN HEAR YOU NOW! SHUTTHEHELLUPYOUGOOBER! First add in the egg whites, then mix in the pine tree. UNF UNF UNF

  99. I invented the secret cow level by deathcow · · Score: 1

    At least I always credited myself : ) My name was Deathcow back in Diablo-1 days, (and thus explains the origins of my name here). For some reason I always enjoyed rounding up a group of people in the chatrooms to visit the "secret cow level". My name lent authenticity to my offers. Once I had a group of hardy adventurers I would lead them to the cows standing around in the field. I would give careful instructions to all of them about where to stand and then tell them to stay put while I opened the gateway. This will begin to test patience after a while. I would then begin to blame the individuals for items they are holding/etc.

    1. Re:I invented the secret cow level by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      What's funny is the fact that Blizzard did listen to all those rumors and put a real secret cow level in D2.

      My question is: will there still be a secret cow level in D3? Or something similar to replace it? (Secret Chicken/Pig Level?)

    2. Re:I invented the secret cow level by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      No, D3's secret level will be full of rabid Deckard Cains asking you to stay a while and listen.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:I invented the secret cow level by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      funnier still, they tried to squash the rumours by having a starcraft cheat code of "thereisnocowlevel", and this only fuelled them more, so blixx put the cow level in D2 to shut everyone up.

      Now, does anyone know what the chat gem does?

      --
      FGD 135
  100. Don't disregard it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't disregard it. In that case you get out of your contract for free. Since this AUP is just to make it easy for them to kill your account (and still charge you) you're not really wanting to go there anyway.

    So just change the debit charge to 0.00 and send them the email.

    PS Is there a Walrus in my sandwich?

  101. Hey, but I got good new about my Verizon DSL! by jfruhlinger · · Score: 1

    They just sent me an update to my DSL terms of service, generously telling me that if I commit to two years of service and within that two years they stop offering DSL service in my neighborhood, I won't be charged an early termination fee! So, it's a good news/bad news kind of situation.

  102. uhhhmm..... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

    thank the gods i use comcast?

  103. So can you ask for your tax back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So can you ask for your tax back? After all, they got to use YOUR land for THEIR profit and you couldn't ask for a penny. Then Verizon took tax money to build out high speed networks. Then they clamored that Muni WiFi was illegal and shut it down (so you can't break their monopoly).

    In what ways are they NOT a government entity? If you dig up their stuff they get the government on you, if you make your own network, they get the government on you and if you want your wasted money back, they get the government to stonewall you.

    And you can't even vote them out.

    PS My apples taste of incarnadine.

  104. I'm more concerned about this clause: by toppavak · · Score: 1

    "(i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic;"

    So what exactly is an excessive amount of email or other Internet traffic?

  105. You do what think? by Montezumaa · · Score: 1

    has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like ?

  106. I'll kill you... by msantosn · · Score: 0

    I hate everybody... Maybe I can restore my karma? May I get a refill ? =)

  107. Preaching to the choir isn't safe by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    On slashdot, that ain't flaming or spamming, that's preaching to the choir.

    ...including, but not limited to...

    According to this AUP, Verizon still has leeway in including "preaching to the choir" as a possible violation of the Agreement even if it has not been specifically enumerated as one like flaming and spamming have been.

  108. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by spidercoz · · Score: 1

    like Backdoor Sluts 9

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  109. Why is nothing here modded +5 offtopic? by FlyingBishop · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You see that sort of thing entirely too rarely.

  110. Dog riding duck action! by Artuir · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvgYTmjwDGY

    But since I'm not on Verizon, I can post this without fear! HAHAHA!

  111. Wow by idontgno · · Score: 1

    Netiquette finally has a death penalty.

    We could have used this wayyy back, at the beginning of The September that never ended.

    Now get offa my Internet, you AOL punks!

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  112. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  113. Red Sox Raising Ticket Price by jeffyboz · · Score: 1

    Don't say anything to Verizon, but it looks like Red Sox tickets are going up (again!!) I, for one, was a LOT happier when we were heart breaking losers... Ah, the good old days. I'm telling you, it was something to see, they would get so close every year, then cut out your heart, dash your brains in, and stomp on your mid-section--but, you could walk right up to the gate and get tickets any time you wanted. It was awesome, really. Now, it's a mess--nobody goes there anymore, it's too, too, oh >boo hoo hoo Did I mention Smelt night? Never mind, that's when I was a Yankees fan (youthful indiscretion, my church prayed for me and it's behind me now.)

    1. Re:Red Sox Raising Ticket Price by jeffyboz · · Score: 1

      I forget, what's a 1? For a score? Total boring loser? Hello? A LOT of people think I'm funny... All the time, people are like, you should totally be a stand up comedian. Have I done it? No. Why should I? There is soooooooo much in technology to be done, but comedy? Ha--it's all been done. Bill Cosby with the kids and chocolate cake, Woody Allen--I'm just a depressed Jew with a hard-on--honey, can I buy you a drink? And 'ol Buddy Hacket jerking off in the corner. Here's a tip, watch the Love Bug movies or Buddy's stand-up act--don't watch both--you'll never get the taste out of you mouth, at least I never have.

  114. I like purple by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    {done in the voice of Sean Connery} Suck it, Verizon. Suck it long and suck it hard.

  115. My complaint about the man with three buttocks by HeavyD14 · · Score: 1

    I've reached a point where I feel the need to express my disappointment with the man with three buttocks. The key point of the following exposition is that I assert that the portrayal of bullies in our culture is partially responsible for the man with three buttocks's actions. No joke. If the man with three buttocks had done its homework, it'd know that if Fate desired that it make a correct application of what it had read about demagogism it would have to indicate title and page number since the overbearing nitwit would otherwise never in all its existence find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, many people are convinced that society should recognize that it uses good motives as a cover for evil ones. I can't comment on that, but I can say that some people feel that the practice of destroying our moral fiber is pernicious and selfish. Others aver that the "freedom" that the man with three buttocks is always so keen to talk about is a sheep's freedom to choose the patch of grass in which it will graze while growing wool and mutton for its owners. In the interest of clearing up the confusion I'll make the following observation: The man with three buttocks takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on it. It also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly contradicts) its position. I am familiar with the man with three buttocks's goals, I understand how it operates, I have long recognized its tactics, and I know just about where the man with three buttocks now stands on the ladder to total power. I can therefore say that, indisputably, it is inherently reprehensible, venom-spouting, and invidious. Oh, and it also has a coldhearted mode of existence. It is my opinion, as well as that of the courts, dozens of professional organizations, and numerous religious leaders, that the man with three buttocks lives in a world of privileged emotion devoid of any connectable empirical dots, yes. But the man with three buttocks would have us believe that the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. What do we owe the man with three buttocks? Nothing, absolutely nothing. If it claims otherwise, we have to stand firm and point out that someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by the man with three buttocks. The memo spells out its plans to lower scholastic standards. If this memo is authentic, it tells us that only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that the man with three buttocks's dupes are unified under a common goal. That goal is to abrogate some of our most fundamental freedoms. One wonders how the man with three buttocks can complain about peevish varmints given that its own ipse dixits also aim to cause this country to flounder on the shoals of self-interest, corruption, and chaos. The man with three buttocks wants nothing less than to plant the seeds of interventionism into the tabulae rasae of children's minds, hence its repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of its lascivious canards. The man with three buttocks says that the majority of cankered monomaniacs are heroes, if not saints. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? The best thing about the man with three buttocks is the way that it encourages us to help you reflect and reexamine your views on the man with three buttocks. No, wait; the man with three buttocks doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, it discourages us from admitting that like other obdurate toughies, it has a finely honed ability to drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that the man with three buttocks's idea of querulous, stuck-up jingoism is no political belief

    1. Re:My complaint about the man with three buttocks by nneonneo · · Score: 1

      You just tried to infect my computer with a virus, didn't you?

      Note to self: don't go about executing Slashdot comments on a vulnerable Windows box.

  116. Last post by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    Now they just need put in something about first posts, and we're set.

    Which reminds me... firs... {checks message count}... aww, c'mon! I meant for everyone else!

  117. Verizon also changed their FiOS ToS today by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    1. If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to your location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will not have to pay an Early Termination Fee.

    My only response was, "Well, duh! They really have to tell you this?" Think maybe they were having a bit of a problem collecting those Early Termination Fees from people they cut off against their will?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  118. I pay the piper, I get the tune. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay the piper, I get the tune.

    "You have no right" my arse.

    I have every right. IT'S MY FRIGGING MONEY!!!

  119. Re:Offtopic? by spidercoz · · Score: 1

    the long answer involves quantum thermodynamics, about 73 pages of math, two ducks, a banana, 16 cheesburgers, the Hope diamond, Prague, the skull of George "Goober" Lindsey, and YOUR MOM

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  120. The rule is even goofier than this. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    It's one thing to say if you break a forums rules by posting offtopic stuff you'll get disconnected. I don't agree with that, but ISPs have long been doing stuff like that.

    You start acting in violation of the terms of a site, and that site complains to the ISP, they have two choices: Disconnect you, or hope that site doesn't entirely block them. So they reserve the right to disconnect you, although they usually only do it for big stuff. (I.e., if a user keeps committing click fraud at Google, and they really don't want Google to just block all their IPs)

    However, this just asserts they can disconnect you from offtopic stuff even when that's not a violation of anyone's terms of service.

    For example, I just went and read slashdot's terms of service, and I see absolutely nothing in there about offtopic posting. There is not the slightest rule on this site that posts be even vaguely relevant to the article at hand, or that replies to posts be even vaguely relevant to what they responded to.

    Which means Verizon is taking a step well past the 'self-protection' we let them get away with, and asserting it is in charge of when it can disconnect people, even if the site they're on has no problem with their behavior.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  121. This article is worse than Hitler. by vrbtm · · Score: 1

    I liked it better when it was called Mine Kampf.

  122. Just sit right back by flahwho · · Score: 1

    Gilligan Likes Maryann's Coconuts.

    1. Re:Just sit right back by Barryke · · Score: 1

      I know its hard to stay offtopic, but you just made a subtle Monty Python reference.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
  123. Dear Verizon by stubob · · Score: 1

    I am Spartacus.

    --
    Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
  124. time for the big guns. by eXFeLoN · · Score: 0

    Ok but what would Hitler do in this situation? Discuss.

    --
    My other sig is a knife wound.
  125. better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer "or incites bigotry, hatred or racism;" since no matter what you post, it is sure to incite hatred, bigotry or racism in someone in the world.

    This makes pretty much everything a violation once the right (or wrong) person reads it.

  126. Out Sourcing of Business Decisions Now? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    FTFA, it is clear that who ever wrote it does not know about American Constitutional Law, American Civil Liberties, and Class Action Lawsuits. One can clearly notice that no one signed their name to this writing; what kind of person does not sign their name to a document they have created? It's not the kind of person that you'd bring home to show Mom, and Dad to. I can see the ACLU thinking, "Ka-Ching", to this law suit. So it's going to boil down to how much are the punitive damages here? How about 3% of Verizon's Gross Sales for starters? But how much are an American's Civil Rights worth? By Verizon's past business practices, not much. I cannot help but wonder when the Federal Government will get tired of Suspected Criminal Gangs "Wip Sawing" Federal Regulations. Maybe this "To Big To Fail" crap can be quietly crib smothered. "Monopolistic Practices, i.e. Global Market" are getting to be a pain in my empty wallet.

    1. Re:Out Sourcing of Business Decisions Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you drunk or high? Verizon has every right under contract law to put these provisions in, as dumb as they may be.

    2. Re:Out Sourcing of Business Decisions Now? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      No, they do not. Nore would I have the right to unilaterally create a contract upon another without the consent of the other party. And Slience is NOT consent. If Verizon does not have a Letter Of Authorization, LOA, then Verizon is Liable for damages they caused. I don't Need Verizon, and I don't have to live like an abused spouse. F'Verizon, and its parents.

  127. *sigh* Another 17-year-old Libertarian... by jeko · · Score: 1

    Going against my better judgement and Ben Franklin's advice, but this bullshit is getting out of hand...

    Look, I know it's fashionable to go with the thin, reedy, overly-nasal GOP line on this, but if you're an American, then the First Amendment DOES apply to you. It applies if you're a judge, a cop, a CEO or the school janitor. The Government doesn't get to do an end run around the Consitution by hiring out some company to do its dirty work for it.

    *Waits for the pencil-necked, pasty-faced, can't-get-laid-in-his-Momma's-basement putz in the back of the room to get it out of his system.*

    Yeah, I know. Strictly speaking, with the same sort of "Urkel-doesn't-get-it-so-he-ain't-ever-gonna-get-it" pickiness that makes all the grownups wanna send you to your room, the Constitution addresses the government. I know.

    *Waits a little more.. and still more...*

    Because, Junior, the Bill of Rights is more than just a string of damn code, that's why. It's an elaboration of the principles that we as Americans hold dear. It's a clumsy attempt to codify the way of life that we won for ourselves at Yorktown. It's not just the rules of the playground. It's our damn National DNA, that's why.

    I know you probably weren't raised right, so you won't understand this, but It's WHO WE ARE. It was a radical idea in 1644 when John Milton wrote the "Areopagitica." It was a belief we all held in our bones by 1776.

    We. Don't. Like. Censorship. We believe in the Marketplace of Ideas (Google it). We believe the cure for Bad Speech is More Speech.

    Anyone who holds power, or so much as puts up a public bulletin board, it bound by it, not because some municipal code requires it, but because that's who we are. We as Americans detest censorship in all its forms, wherever it rears its head.

    Verizon is wrong not because they are breaking some law, but because the action itself offends the sensibilities of the country that sustains it. We're all free men here. We're not afraid to hear dissenting opinions, and we for damn sure don't hide from them behind red tape and bureaucratic crap like "terms of service."

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  128. I know it's a parody but... by nozendo · · Score: 1

    ... responses in this thread look similar to most slashdot posts.

    =P

  129. Can you afford me now?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good. Can you afford me now???

  130. Praise of fishfood by Barryke · · Score: 1

    There was this one fish i saw today on the internet somewhere, it looks like a robotfish, swims like a robotfish, and gulps like a dead fish. A fish that has been dead for a week, not a fresly cought spasm one. Anyway the fish was ugly. I don't like robotfish. Whats up with the palmtrees in concrete bins anyways? They're like everywhere where they once decided to pave the beach.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  131. Re:Contact Verizon and let them know you disapprov by pclminion · · Score: 1

    "Oooh, scary! Somebody who's not our customer is going to continue not being our customer! We're trembling!"

  132. Quickly, while you have a chance! by zorg50 · · Score: 1

    You can post whatever the hell you want and still get modded +5 Funny!

  133. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by icebraining · · Score: 1

    Actually, Japanese adult movies are required to pixelizate the "private parts", unlike American or European movies.

  134. Duke Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go Jayhawks!

  135. Re:It's difficult to write laws that make sense. by Seriousity · · Score: 1

    Either give me abiguity or give me ambiguity!

    --
    This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
  136. If you get FIOS, there'll be Cake! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    See section (f), above, and you can have some cake!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  137. Looks like typical anti-spam/spoof/harass overkill by billstewart · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    While it looks like too many lawyers and non-lawyers were copying other services' AUPs, it looks like what they're really trying to do is give themselves leverage to drop you if you engage in activities that get them hit with too many complaints. That's not the same as saying that they'll go trying to police your postings (yeah, like that would make financial sense), but they want to be able to kill spammers, blog-comment-spammers, and anybody else that causes them trouble.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  138. Headphone review: v-moda vibe by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    A few days ago my Sennheiser CX300 (in-ear headphones) broke and, due to a recommendation by a friend with respect to their longevity, I decided to buy myself the v-moda vibe (also in-ear headphones, even though they do sound like a sex toy). The price I paid was 43 EUR (~64 USD), S/H included.

    The build quality of the vibe is fairly good, with pretty much everything but the cables being made of metal. The cables are the usual thin stranded wire, covered by what v-moda asserts to be kevlar, which is covered by a layer of clear plastic (which apparently is only the case if you buy it in the "Flashblack" color scheme). One improvement of the cables over the CX300's is that the surface is smoother, causing the vibe to generate fewer friction sounds. Unfortunately, the cable isn't any longer than the Sennheiser's, measuring only about 115 cm (~45.5 in) plug-to-earphone. Also, the plug is not angled, like most headphones', but straight, which might not be to everyone's taste.

    You also get a faux leather carrying bag, a cable wrapping helper made from silicone and six silicone ear fittings (three sizes each in transparent and black) - all in all a rather decent set of extras.

    The vibe is one of the few headphones with a plug that doesn't slip out of a unibody MBP's audio jack at the slightest touch. It generally forms very solid connections with the jacks you plug it into, which prevents accidental unplugging.

    Sound-wise it tends to emphasize the bass and, slightly, the highs. In my opinion this means a downgrade in audio quality from the more balanced CX300 as I value clear mid-range frequencies but someone interested in an affordable open in-ear headphone with a solid bass could certainly give the vibe a try.
    If I had to buy again, I'd probably go with the CX300, though - if I could still find one. Pretty much all retailers have switched over to the more expensive CX-300 II. Longevity might still make the vibe the better deal but only time will tell that.

    PROS:
    - good accessories package (especially the double set of fittings) - smooth, supposedly damage-resistant cables
    - plug doesn't slip out of MBP audio jack

    CONS:
    - emphasize on bass (not a concern if you want that)
    - cable could be a bit longer

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  139. Enhanced Services aren't Common Carrier by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Internet services are "enhanced" services, not common-carrier voice. And if you read the blurbs at the beginning of your phone book, you'll see that they've got an AUP that says you're not allowed to use your land-line phone for obscene or harassing phone calls either. (Or the Phone Police will go rip your phone out of the wall.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  140. It could be worse by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    #1 Internet posts must be done under your real name, no handle, no nickname, no fake name. If you are found not using your real name you will be dropped.

    #2 Opinions and insults are not allowed. If you don't make statements of facts that are not libelious or slanderous, you will be dropped. If you are found making an opinion or insult or anything not a fact that can be proven, you will be dropped.

    #3 No trolling no cyber bullying, if you harass someone in this manner you will be dropped.

    #4 No hate speech against any group, you will be dropped.

    #5 Visits only to approved web sites, if you visit the wrong type of web sites as defined by our management, then you will be dropped.

    #6 No porno, if you access porn of any type you will be dropped.

    #7 Windows only, no Linux, Mac OSX, or non-Window OS will be allowed to use our Internet services. If you are found to use a non-Windows OS you will be dropped.

    #8 You cannot use the Internet for pranks, jokes, humor, or anything of the funny nature or you will be dropped. Be serious or find another ISP.

    #9 No proxy servers and other software and services that hide your IP address. We consider this criminal activity and you will be dropped.

    #10 No P2P file sharing, as a result bandwidth will be capped to 19.2KBps, use of any more than that will be considered illegal download of copyrighted materials and you will be dropped. Also see rule 7 no Linux ISO downloads either as we consider it illegal use of P2P networks and don't see Linux as a valid OS to use with our Internet services.

    P.S. Oh by the way, spammers, scammers, get rick quick Ponzi schemes, and other stuff is allowed, as long as you use your real name and don't violate any of the other rules.

    P.P.S. Oh by the way we made a deal with the NSA/CIA/FBI etc to wirelessly wiretap your Internet connection and give up data on you to the government for suspicious activity like breaking rules 1 to 7 or others.

    P.P.P.S. Oh by the way this is now federal law and approved by the UN so now all ISPs will adopt these code violations.

    P.P.P.P.S. If you violate any of these rules/laws or we even perceive or think you did, you will be Banned from the Internet.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:It could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like how you've grouped pinions and insults together, you ignorant twat.

  141. Off topic... by ittybad · · Score: 1

    I know that this is off topic, but ******* Connection Terminated ******

    --
    No single raindrop believes it is to blame for the flood.
  142. Email chain letters too? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    So i can get people cut off if they forward me useless chain emails? Cool.

    Oh, and bunnies are pink..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  143. More changes??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Terms of Service, your
    continued use of the Service after the effective date of this change
    will constitute your agreement to the change.
    1. If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to
    your location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will not
    have to pay an Early Termination Fee.

    Just got this from Verizon today. I wonder what they will call the fee?

  144. Afghanistan! by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    So, Obama's going to announce extending the War in Afghanistan. Discuss.

  145. I ATE THEM! by bonze · · Score: 1

    THERE ARE THINGS MAN WAS NOT MEANT TO KNOW! HERE ARE A FEW!

    "So did you hear the story about Gregg and Tolos? Anyway Tolos ... he's this Rottweiler, you see ..."
    [details omitted]

    "Alone at home, Gregg's excitement grew and grew... he grasped the cord and thrust the plug home! Soon he would be plugged IN... consequences be damned! As the drool of long-suppressed anticipation of THE FORBIDDEN ACT dripped from his lips, the electric shock from the amplifier chassis coursed through his brain like a million electric eels, annihilating the very substance of his grey matter, and even so he REACHED FOR THE GUITAR to COMMIT THE ULTIMATE SIN ... "
    [In compliance with the Federal Communication Commissions' Good Neighbor Noise Reducation Ordinance of 1993, the remainder of this passage has been squelched.]

    "And so there was the master tape for 'Back From Samoa', but there no longer, so where was it? Maybe I a..."
    [transmission broken]

  146. me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!)

  147. Mind the gap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hari-kiri Rock! I need scissors! 61!

  148. Verizon is counter-cultural. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    The constitution expresses the sentiment of our culture in the United States. I was merely mentioning that Verizon goes against that sentiment.

  149. Re:Offtopic? by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

    We have a winner. It's spidercoz. The rest of you, thanks for playing. We can all go home now.

    --
    "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
  150. Thanks for the warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Below are snippets from an email I got from Verizon today, regarding TOS changes.

    Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:24:43 -0600 (CST)

    Subject: Effective November 30, 2009 - Important Information Regarding a Change
      to Your Verizon Online Terms Of Service ...As set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Terms of Service, your
    continued use of the Service after the effective date of this change
    will constitute your agreement to the change.

    Thanks for the warning, Verizon. Can I have a copy of the calender you're using?

  151. Dammit! by plaxion · · Score: 1

    For a second there I thought /. finally implemented the ability to moderate the stories themselves.

  152. Ceiling cat... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    ...watches you masturbate. Senator Larry Craig is jealous of ceiling cat and would like to steal his ceiling modification technology to watch baseball player Grady Sizemore.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  153. Carrier Detect and Terminal Ready by Myria · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised it wasn't used more often, but there's a better way with modems to prevent problems with +++ and NO CARRIER.

    With proper settings, the serial line CD (Carrier Detect) is raised when the modem is connected, and lowered when it disconnects.
    Also with proper settings, if the computer lowers the TR (Terminal Ready) serial line, the modem will hang up.

    With this, you can do ATS2=255 or something like that to disable the +++ system. Then you can send any data you want, because the connection control is out-of-band.

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  154. Ah...it takes me back to the bad old days... by meowhous · · Score: 0
    Reminds me of the specs we used to get from Verizon. If we got anything resembling specs (e.g., things typed in or printed on paper).

    Anybody remember the MS License Agreement that required you not use Word to criticize MS?

  155. all your base are belong to us by vaporland · · Score: 1

    and terms and conditions too...

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  156. Conspiracy by Cobra+Spaz · · Score: 0

    I think that Verizon was paid off by some assholes on Slashdot that who were tired of idiots coming on and rambling about off topic nonsense... so now Slashdot has an even better way to punish Off Topic morons. They have a script that sends all of the users who were flagged as offtopic to a SQL database that Verizon then checks against their database. If there are any matches Verizon punishes them.

    This is Bullshit.

  157. Depends on what they mean... by seebs · · Score: 1

    But 99% of usenet spam is offtopic posting...

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  158. Non Sequitur? by dmomo · · Score: 1

    I hardly know her!

  159. Cut the crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm checkin' out:

    "(i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic"

    Without a definition of "excessive" it kinda' leaves the barn door wiiiiiiiiiiiide open..

    Why don't they just cut the crap and say:

    "We can cut you off any time we like - for no good goddamn reason at all."

    That would save it's users hours of reading the fine print AUP

  160. Not a recent change... by Lorki · · Score: 1

    As despicable as the Verizon AUP is, this is not a new change. Here is a link to a rant in 2006 about the FIOS TOS including a mention of offtopic posting. In other current news, Ban Ki-moon has been elected to replace Kofi Annan as the secretary-general of the UN...

  161. Unprecedented powers for message boards admins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine, you can now ban your users not only from your message board , but from his ISP as well! :evil:

  162. Generate excessive amounts of... traffic by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

    (i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic

    That's the worst clause. So now you can be cut off for merely using your pipe to its maximum.

  163. A Watts by memnock · · Score: 1

    ~in order to clear one's mind, think of something with no meaning, like a sound~