Slashdot Mirror


Daikatana Sucks: It's Official

quakedaddy writes: "There's a pretty comical look at 'John Romero's Suck it down I will make you my bitch Daikatana.' Guess it's official -- Ion Storm's cash cow to be never will be. The first person shooter that took four years to make is just poo. There's also some info on Paul Steed's sacking from id Software here." Anyone else played it?

182 comments

  1. It doesn't matter by sprayNwipe · · Score: 4

    Unfortunately, it doesn't matter if DK is good or not anymore for romero - It's already at #5 for sales last week:

    GameWEEK Sales charts for 5/21/00

    My theory is that people are buying it to see how bad it is - with that much hype, people are going to be curious.

    Whether it makes its money back or not, I don't know...I think Ion Storms other titles (Deus Ex, Anacronox) will start bringing revenue in for Ion, as well as being *shock* suprisingly good games (especially when compared to DK and Dominon ;p)

    1. Re:It doesn't matter by Dr_Chump · · Score: 1

      What's truly disturbing about the 'Sales chart' is that, "who wants to be a millionaire2" is #1. Tells ya something about what the mass market buys

    2. Re:It doesn't matter by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with you when there's a truly first-rate ultra-realistic flight sim for any game console. There are exactly zero, and there will always be zero. I hope I'm wrong...

      And multiplayer gaming on the console is still a really different thing from a PC. Right now, they're complimentary, not replacements for one another...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:It doesn't matter by tealover · · Score: 2

      wow, looking at that list makes me realize how down and out the PC gaming market is. consoles are kicking the PC's ass every which way.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
  2. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by FraggleMI · · Score: 4

    I wish that I could have a multi million dollar lesson...

    --
    huh?
  3. Re:Diakatana Truly is a bad game by QuMa · · Score: 1

    1. The guns are WAYYYYY to powerful and not properly balanced. One should not have the ability to kill an entire room (albeit a small room) of people with one shot from a particular weapon.

    Of course not. *cough* redeemer *cough* bfg *cough*

  4. Re:I've Played Every FPS Ever Released, And... by kammat · · Score: 1

    You forgot the Marathon series for Mac, some of the finest FPS for its time. There were many hours of saturating the network, and who knows how many failed tests because of those games on our campus. And if you thought SHODAN was a looney in System Shock, just wait until you meet Durandal.

  5. The Horror! Will we never learn? by BoLean · · Score: 1

    Stop messing with the natural order. Stop experimenting with other dimensions. For the love of humanity, just STOP!

  6. Re:Not wasted effort by Bieeardo · · Score: 1

    Or perhaps a technological tombstone, a-la Trespasser.

    --

    Five tons of flax.

  7. Re:Wow, what a shock... by sammy+baby · · Score: 2

    Actually, I don't think that's appropriate. Most of the reviews I'm seeing agree that Daikatana (which I haven't yet played) isn't completely devoid of merit, it's just bad. No one has said anything so good about Battlefield Earth.

    The thing that makes Daikatana's badness so hard to swallow is the amount of time and money invested in it. With that in mind, I suggest the following alternative: Daikatana is the Waterworld of computer games.

  8. Re:I've Played Every FPS Ever Released, And... by Osmosis · · Score: 1

    How about Blake stone ?

    Not many people seem to have heard of it, probably rightly so. :)

    --
    "I like to sit and cry in front of my T.V." -- T.V. Song - Moondog Jr.
  9. I wish GoGeek reviews were up and running... by Monthenor · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I had this demo, right? And it was supposed to be good, right? Wrong....I turned both my monitor and the in-game brightness all the way up, and I still couldn't see jackity crap around me. Factoring in that none of the enemies came above my knee or below my hairline, it made for a very frustrating play experience. Games should be hard, but they shouldn't punish you for not walking with your nose to the ground.

    Maybe I'll kick off the reviews with this. Maybe not.
    ------------------------

    --
    Co-founder of GerbilMechs
  10. Hey, quit the Edsel bashing already. by BoLean · · Score: 1

    Picasso could barely hawk his wares for food. Maybe in time Daikatana will be seen as an autistic masterpiece too.

  11. How 2 Save Daikatana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All EIDOS has to do is strike a deal with PC Gamer and re-release the title as "Coconut Monkey Presents!"

  12. Copy/Pasting No necessarily redundant. by BoLean · · Score: 1

    In the case of yesterday's story where the article ws in postscript and there are a lot of people at work without access to a postscript viewr, then it is a service. Not to mention cases where the site/story in question gets /.ed and the only other choice is listneing to people comment on a story they didn't read.

  13. Another review - from Ars Technica by sleeperservice · · Score: 1

    http://arstechnica.com/reviews/2q00/daikatana/daik atana-1.html

    Like the others: funny, short, to the point.

  14. Re:There is one simple criteria. by lemox · · Score: 1

    Daikatana is just another creative embarrassment in a long line of such writing/designing disasters that are basically making the American video game industry a lot like the Japanese movie industry of days gone by. Except that Godzilla didn't look so blocky.

    Heh, I wonder if about 10 years in the future if there will be cult fans of bad games like Japanese Cinema...

    "Come on over man, we're gonna get some beer, play some Daikatana and Deerhunter and laugh 'till we puke!"

    --

    "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

  15. This is old news... by hemanman · · Score: 1

    I read a MUCH more entertaining review 4 days ago on Voodooextreme.

    -H

  16. Wheel of Time by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

    May I suggest The Wheel of Time if you want a non sci-fi FPS.


    He who knows not, and knows he knows not is a wise man

  17. Does anybody else feel this way? by vanguard · · Score: 1

    All these terrible reviews are making me want to buy this game. How bad is it? I couldn't resist hearing 2 Live Crew when the popular notion was to ban them. I can't resist buying the game now that the popular notion is to rip it.

    Maybe the old cliche is true. Maybe bad press is better than no press after all?

    --
    That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
  18. Official... by SonicRED · · Score: 1
    One web site's opinion on a game that has become trendy to make fun of makes this news official?

    Seems kind of subjective to me, but hell I thought it sucked me down too.

    Ah hell, this whole post is coming out the wrong way, just like all those games that get released early.

    But what I really find sad is that Paul Steed closed Looking Glass. They made THIEF man. What the hell was he thinking? It's no wonder ID fired him.

    This is my understanding of the current situations in game world.
    WooH, maybe burning these Microsoft CD's in my office was a bad idea, the fumes are starting to brun my trhota.

    1. Re:Official... by demon · · Score: 1

      Wha? How did Paul Steed have _anything_ to do with the demise of LGS? Where did you get this idea?

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  19. Re:Yes, but... by Uller-RM · · Score: 1

    He'd be proud of it, yes. He also realizes, since it is a pile of shit, it stinks. Romero thinks Daikatana is a masterpiece. In this way, his shit stinks less than Romeros. :)

  20. We waited 3 years by James_Kirk · · Score: 1

    3 years for this. I could program something in pascal more entaining then this game in 3 years!!

  21. Brother, can you spare a neuron? by TBHiX · · Score: 1

    You know, I don't really follow the gaming world, but when the whole "Stevie Case in Playboy" broughahah was kicking around here a couple of weeks back, I mostly thought, "Weird. for a game that promises to be one of the hottest new releases this year (italics represent my assumption), this is an unusually cheesy publicity stunt for the company." After all, with the talent supposedly hired in Ion Storm, it's not like they need to push product that hard, right?

    Now we see the fruits of their collective talents.

    Ogg feel stupid. Ogg go now, throw rock at cave painting, try not get hit by flint chips. (<-- original FPS)

    -TBHiX-

  22. Game engine? by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Does the game at least use a new superwhammydyne game engine? At least if it did they could recoup a few losses licensing the engine. You know, like that sucky game Unreal did? Unreal sucked after the first level. At least these guys were honest and sucked from the beginning.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Game engine? by lemuru · · Score: 1

      Nope. It uses the old Quake II engine.

    2. Re:Game engine? by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      umm, they licensed the quake (1!) engine, and then upgraded to the quake 2 engine.

      so, no.

    3. Re:Game engine? by doublem · · Score: 1

      It's based on the Quake II engine. NOT the Quake III engine, but the Quake II engine.

      It would have been nice if they'd made things look BETTER than Quake II, but really, the levels you can download off the web for Quake II blow Dikacrapa out of the water.


      Matthew Miller,

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  23. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by Carnage4Life · · Score: 3

    This type of attitude bothers me a lot. Romero poured his heart and soul into this game, and even though it was totally over-hyped and underachieving in the end, Daikatana made it to store shelves.

    Yeah, your type of attitude bothers me a great deal as well. Reasoning like that is lowering standards everywhere and has screwed up our educational system with ludicrous concepts like social promotion (why bother doing well if you go on to the next class anyway? therefore there are no repercussions for failure). So what do you suggest that after spending four years shooting of his mouth and drowning us with his ego we should congratulate John Romero for shipping software even if it is shitty?!? Hell, no.
    As for the so-called Daikatana Process "big, frigging deal". Every sufficiently large software project has interesting stories of design, personality clashes and innovation hiding away somewhere...why should we celebrate the story of the creation of a horrible piece of software when there are more deserving projects to laud both as games and as feats of engineering and design (Half-Life, System Shock 2, Baldur's Gate, Quake 3, Theif I and II, anything from Blizzard, etc). Next thing you'll be suggesting that we cheer MSFT on for being brave enough to release Windows 95/98 even though they knew they'd get laughed at...

    PS: I especially dislike Ion Storm because after Eidos wasted money supporting them there was nothing left over to stop Looking Glass Studios from going under.

    analogy:
    Frankly if I shot my mouth of about how much I could code to a bunch of developers and how l33t I was only to turn out not to be able to write a BubbleSort or create a Hash Function I'd expect to be laughed out of town and I would deserve it.

  24. The Real Tragedy of This... by krmt · · Score: 5

    The worst part about the whole Daikatana mess doesn't even have to do with Ion Storm at all, but Looking Glass. Looking Glass closed because their deal with Eidos fell through, because Eidos didn't have enough money to pay. Meanwhile, Eidos had sunk multiple millions in to a game that predictably sucked and will never ever recoup the losses. Meanwhile, the folks at Looking Glass made Thief 2, which is selling well and getting great reviews all around. This game was made under a lot of preassure, as the company had been having financial problems, but they still produced an amazing product. Their engine isn't that fantastic graphically either (the sound is awesome though) but unlike Daikatana, the gameplay itself is great. It's truly sad that something like this happened, that a piece of overbudget crap put a group of creative and well respected game designers out of a job. I hope Romero is ashamed at himself for making such garbage and for denying the folks of Looking Glass a chance to make more great games.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    1. Re:The Real Tragedy of This... by shadrax · · Score: 1

      I share your view about the lamentable passing of Looking Glass. However, the situation with Looking Glass is a bit more complicated than that; Eidos wasn't the only contributor to the disaster, and even if it were, Eidos has problems bigger than Ion Storm and Daikatana. Here's an explanation from an ex-Looking Glass employee.

      (Still, I have to wonder: why is it so hard to get good games published? And why don't gaming companies make more innovative games like Thief? Then again, the same mediocrity exists in Hollywood, the music industry, TV, and American pop culture generally...)

  25. Killcreek? by jpowers · · Score: 1

    What's this page now, Old Man Murray or something? While you're over there, look at the SWAT 3 Strategy Guide, it's funny.

    A good, "non-biased" review of Daikatana can be found at Dailyradar.

    -jpowers

    --

    -jpowers
  26. Why do we fall for rock stars? by whuppy · · Score: 1

    As soon as John Romero was lionized by the popular press, you just knew that everything he touched from then on would turn to shit.

    --
    whuppy enjoys smelling like diesel fuel
  27. I was sorely tempted by whuppy · · Score: 1
    My theory is that people are buying it to see how bad it is - with that much hype, people are going to be curious.

    At the Electronics Boutique last weekend, I gawked at the box like I was rubbernecking at a road accident. I couldn't help myself: I really wanted to buy the damn thing just to wallow in its awfulness.

    I didn't buy it, though. It'll hit the bargain bins soon enough.

    --
    whuppy enjoys smelling like diesel fuel
  28. id by jbarnett · · Score: 2


    The only thing I wonder, is what would of been producted if you gave ID Software or Blizzard 4 years to produce a game and $20-30 Million (or what ever the amount was) and a hand full of talented developers.

    OH wait, Blizzard is a bad example, how long has Diablo II been in production? 2-3, 4 years?? Oh wait, Diablo II looking intresting, fun and graphically appealing though. :)

    I would like to see a side by side "deathmatch" or Quake3 vs Dakartina

    --

    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
  29. Thats what you get for... by ikekrull · · Score: 1

    Getting big-titted sluts to do your levels for you instead of actual level designers

    --
    I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
  30. sharkey "extreme" ??! by Pope · · Score: 2

    Oh, for the love of god!
    Anyone naming anything "Extreme" in this day in age should be sent crawling back to the marketing seminar from whence they came!

    Ah, sorry for the rant folks, I must be having a low blood sugar attack. I think I'll walk up to Taco Bell and get one of their Extreme Number Two combos...

    Pope

    Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  31. Firingsquad review by Oscarfish · · Score: 1

    I didn't need this story to tell me Daikatana sucks - Thresh's put up a review this morning. They tore it up, just like everybody else did, with a score of 25%.

    --

    --------

    Oscarfish.com: tropical fish with attitude. Way t

  32. Re:Daikatana and Battlecruiser by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Why are you defending Ion Storm? They've been promising a game for four years and then release a POS that Eidos sucked up the cost of. This new drink coaster is putting Eidos out of money that could be better used to hire Lara Croft models with.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  33. Re:another review by Urmane · · Score: 1

    Come on, Lowtax; don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel.

    --

    --
    "I find your lack of faith disturbing." -- Darth Vader
  34. Re:Daikatana and Battlecruiser by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'd prefer nude Laura Croft models. I'm not going to fault anyone for trying, and it's just bad form to attack them personally (which is rampant here) rather than attack their crappy progs.

  35. Re:Everybody loves Daikatana! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Jee-zus... You know it's bad when both Gamespot and Happypuppy give it a bad review. Neither are known for being particularly impartial-- for example, HP had the unmitigated gall to give Tomb Raider 1.7-- er, Tomb Raider 3 a bloody 7 out of 10. A piss-poor review from them is a pretty good indicator of an absolutely unplayable title.

    (Not really an AC, just Bieeardo trying to avoid karma whoring.)

  36. Re: You are incorrect by god_of_the_machine · · Score: 2

    This is the result of Eidos capping off the number of press copies to 500.

    "Ha, reminds me of the movie "the Avengers". It was so bad that the studio didn't let critics see it in advance to slow down the bad reviews and at least maybe get a good weekend in.

    -rt-

    --

    -rt-
    ** Evil Canadians are taking over the world. Learn about the conspiracy
  37. Re:There is one simple criteria. by latro · · Score: 1

    I remember a friend of mine was playing doom on a PC and I showed him Marathon on my Mac. "What's this? You can look up and down? Amazing!" I won't even get into how engrossing the Marathon story was. Ah, those were the days...

    -------

    --

    -------

    "It was people! People soiled our green!"
  38. Wow, what a shock... by Rombuu · · Score: 5

    Wow, who would have thought this thing would suck after spending so much money and time on it.

    Everyone should read the story on Ion Storm that ran in the Dallas Observer (here is a link to it) for a picture of too much ego + too much money.

    On the plus side, instead of saying "Oh, that's the Heaven's Gate of Computer Games", we can say "Oh, how Daikatana"

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    1. Re:Wow, what a shock... by buffy · · Score: 2

      Sadly, I know the experience first hand. The company that I still work for (for the next 1.5 weeks that is...) used to be a cdrom company. Back in the days we dropped some serious coin developing a georgeous game, based on dolphins in space, none-the-less, but when the bottom of the cd-rom market, it was eventually shelved. A very sad thing, indeed. In the hayday we had a dual (perhaps triple) shifts of animators working on farms of SGIs, rendering 24x7x365 on a large SGI Challenge XL (bad ass machine of it's day.) After the fall, the SGIs became desktop machines for web programmers, and the XL had a short life as a really big and expensive web server. Not that we haven't done some really great work in the past couple of years, but now that I'm in my last days of employment there, I look back on that game with sadness and loss--the work that had been done would've been like nothing else you'd seen on the market. R*I*P Bluestar. The company is Magnet for those interested.

    2. Re:Wow, what a shock... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Was the dolphins in space game related to Brin's Uplift War series? For those who haven't read it, it's pretty darn brilliant sci-fi stuff.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Wow, what a shock... by RiotNrrd · · Score: 1

      Man, I thought that I had worked with some assholes.

      "This is the true story of what happens when a group of over-rated egomaniacs work together..."

      Maybe they can recoup some of their losses by working something out with Burnam/Murray and/or Viacom...

    4. Re:Wow, what a shock... by lordmage · · Score: 1

      Blah... Battlefield Earth was not bad.. was good for what they paid for it. 50 mill.

      I read the book so was not lost, if you have not read the book, do so and then watch the movie. Made it more fun to watch forrest whitaker play a psyclo.

      Oh, TRavolta did say "Leverage" too much.

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
    5. Re:Wow, what a shock... by SignaI+11 · · Score: 1

      Why is it that all the reviewers seem to heap glowing praise on Diakatana for it's "unique time-travel aspects"? They seem to think that if it wasn't for the crappy execution, the idea would have been original and worthwhile. Doesn't anyone remember the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles arcade game? Turtles in Time? (Also release on SNES as TMNT4) Sure it was back in the early 90's but c'mon...to the best of my knowledge it was the first game not about time travel to incorporate time travel. It was also a damn good game. From 2500000 BC up to 2030 back to (then) present 1992. A fun filled romp through time. Bah. I understand that reviewers may be desperate for SOMETHING good to say but...please...time travel is old hat for movies AND video games...so enough already.

      --
      -o Disclaimer: My employer doesn't even agree with me about C indentation style. o-
    6. Re:Wow, what a shock... by buffy · · Score: 1

      I honestly can't remember, and don't think anyone left here knows. Cool thing is that we got Levar Burton (forgive the spelling) to do some footage of the game. I remember seeing a lot of the work he did on our digital disc recorder after compositing was done.

    7. Re:Wow, what a shock... by ruin · · Score: 1
      Everyone should read the story on Ion Storm that ran in the Dallas Observer (here is a link to it) for a picture of too much ego + too much money.

      I was sure you were going to make the pun "too much ego + not enough Id."

      Oh well. From all accounts, Daikatana is a mediocre game that should have come out at least a year ago. If John Romero truly wants to be the design god he claims he is, then he should check out and learn from some of the more modern (than Doom) examples of great FPS design, like Half-life, System Shock 2, or Goldeneye.

      --

      --
      share and enjoy
    8. Re:Wow, what a shock... by Bilestoad · · Score: 2

      How about "this is the Battlefield Earth of computer games"?

      But I think critics had even more fun with that disaster.

    9. Re:Wow, what a shock... by botkiller · · Score: 1

      heh, i think we all saw this coming. My friend was going nuts over Daikatana when it went into production 4 years ago, and even then I knew that Romero would take forever to get it done. Ionstorm always kinda seemed like the "Empire that's not an empire but feels like it is" to me, I suppose that the empire forgot how to write good game engines... "Condensing fact from the vapor of nuance" - neal stephenson, Snow Crash

      --
      brian botkiller "Condensing fact from the vapor of nuance" - Neal Stephenson, Snow Crash
    10. Re:Wow, what a shock... by ChazeFroy · · Score: 2

      I bet Romero now wishes Killcreek's breast implants were refundable.

  39. All we need now... by Master+of+Kode+Fu · · Score: 1

    ...is for someone to design some Battlefield Earth skins and levels to make the whole ordeal complete!

  40. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by cian · · Score: 1

    Not if used appropriately

  41. Corrected URL by raph · · Score: 2

    A working URL is here.

    --

    LILO boot: linux init=/usr/bin/emacs

    1. Re:Corrected URL by Vladinator · · Score: 1

      Very Interesting! Does anyone have any information on what happened to the following tidbit from this article?

      "In May, it was Wright's turn. ION Storm fired Wright, they claim, because he tried to incite a rebellion among ION's employees. (Wright denies this.) The two sides sued each other, Wright claiming that the remaining ION partners tried to cut him out of a pending buyout by game publisher Eidos. The case is set to go to trial February 15."

      Is this still pending? If not, what was the outcome?

      Hey Rob, Thanks for that tarball!
      Scott

      --

      "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  42. lol by faeryman · · Score: 1

    Daikatana sx0rs! this isnt flambait, Henmos said so! only weenies play it!

    in all seriousness though, i played the demo...and *cough* it wasn't all that. i ran around in a cheap rip off of a level from Turok on the N64, fighting dragonflys of all things, and looking at the text 'you feel the poison leaving your body' or some such broken english nonsense run by.

    my boss was like 'faeryman, turn that crap off.' for once my boss was right.

    sorry john, i used to have a picture of you (long flowing hair and all) taped on my monitor. not anymore bud, not anymore

    --


    ,
    faeryman
  43. Re:Offensive Stereotypes by Bieeardo · · Score: 1
    Yes, but there is a great deal of difference between your professors and the introduction to Daikatana. First, the "stereotypical" reversal of "r" and "l" sounds by Japanese speakers is due to their similarities (I'd dig out one of my linguistics textbooks, but I don't feel like it). It really can't be helped.

    Second, since the first episode is set in Japan, and the main character is presumably Japanese, and the old man is most certainly Japanese, it stands to reason that they may actually be speaking... wait for it... Japanese!

    Now, following this line of reasoning, it can be safely assumed that the dialogue has been translated into English, possibly via Suspension of Disbelief. Since the dialogue is a translation of two native Japanese speakers conversing, the old man's confusion of "r" and "l" sounds would not have been translated through-- the sound differences are irrelevant in Japanese, and therefore irrelevant to the translation. Since his "r" and "l" sounds are confused, even after translation, it's patently obvious that this confusion was intentionally included; unfortunately, it's impossible to tell if its inclusion was supposed to provoke indignation, laughter, this rant, or even more controversy over Romero's apparent disconnection from reality.

    --

    Five tons of flax.

  44. another review by matticus · · Score: 5

    Lowtax at Something Awful has an even funnier look at Daikatana and the release. it's utterly hilarious. you thought the sharky extreme review was mean, i don't know how Romero can look at his face in the morning after this review. ouch...but for some real comedy, read Lowtax's reviews of The War In Heaven or Thundra.

    1. Re:another review by cbuskirk · · Score: 1

      WOW! I have never seen such a scathing article in my life. Oh wait I forgot about Aqua DP2 and DP3.(Not flaimbait!) Anyways I can't belive that something could be so horrible. After reading about every single problem and flaw, I need to try it to see how bad it could possibly be. I mean it's like staring at a car wreck or trying to install MS Exchange server over and expecting a different result. You know it's morbid... You know it's wrong... But you just have to do it! Great marketing Romero. Make a game so bad people have to play it to see how bad it really is.

    2. Re:another review by Osmosis · · Score: 1

      I thought that the wide selection of weapons were just as good, and I thought better than any other fps that I had played.

      While it's refreshing to hear someone actually saying something positive about Daikatana, this comment seriously bugs me. The best !?
      If you want a game that combines SF and fantasy, why not play System Shock 2 or Thief, both games by Looking Glass, and the products of Looking glass, which is where those bloody $26 million should have gone.

      --
      "I like to sit and cry in front of my T.V." -- T.V. Song - Moondog Jr.
    3. Re:another review by bparrish · · Score: 1

      System Shock 2 was created by Irrational Games, not Looking Glass.

    4. Re:another review by magicsquid · · Score: 3

      I suppose this is flame bait, but here goes anyway. I played the demo and *gasp* I liked it. I'm tired of seeing all the sci fi first person shooters, and when I played the first level of Daikatana I thought it was just going to be another of those. To my surprise it wasn't. Sure it had sci fi elements, but I was pleasantly surprised that it had dark ages mythology/fantasy in there also. I thought that the graphics were good and the shading/textures were good also. I thought that the wide selection of weapons were just as good, and I thought better than any other fps that I had played. To each his own though.

      "I can't kill my friend. Kill my friend."

      --


      "Chances of RHIC-induced Armageddon are exceedingly rare, but... you never know." - MIT Physicist Bob Jaffe
    5. Re:another review by GRAMMERSoft · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's interesting in the sense of "an interesting psychological case study".

      --
      That said, I think it's time I changed my .sig (again)
    6. Re:another review by Glint · · Score: 1

      I like how the only person who liked the game gets moderated up to +4 for "Interesting."

      More like "Just plain weird."

  45. Another POV by gedanken · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that so many people enjoy slamming daikatana for being such a bad game. A common theme seems to be like the one mentioned by the poster "Ion Storm's cash cow to be never will be."

    Here is something to look at:
    http://208.232.126.139/npd_trsts/lookuptrsts.asp ?id=15&date=5/21/00

    See thanks to all your guys free publicity in wanting to slam this horrible game, it has sparked an interest that has driven the game's sales rank to 5th!

    Now all those people who bought this game because they wanted to see just how bad it was could have spent this money on say, something made by Looking Glass.

    I hope your proud.

  46. daikatana pr0n by schmack · · Score: 3
    You've gotta check out this mp3 by The Laziest Men on Mars.

    It takes chunks of dialog from the Daikatana characters and sets it to a cheesy porn soundtrack to provide a whole new meaning to the "big sword" moniker. This link came from Old Man Murray.

    Much funnier than ASCII text could ever be.

    1. Re:daikatana pr0n by jpatokal · · Score: 1
      You've gotta check out this mp3 by The Laziest Men on Mars.

      The server seems to be slashdotted, anybody got a mirror?

      Or maybe I'll just go trawl Napster...

      Cheers,
      -j.

  47. When good games die while bad games live. by Picass0 · · Score: 4

    The thing that pisses me off when I read about half ass games that get published is I wonder what was sacraficed to breathe life into this turd.

    I wanted to see Babylon 5:Into the Fire. It was a game that was high on my "to buy" list. I had been to Sierra's site several times to check out the screenshots, mpg movies, and occasionally read the developer's .plan files.

    As many of you know, Sierra fired a bunch of it's developers. The development staff of B5 (as well as the developers for Middle Earth) was given 30 days notice and the software was cancelled.

    OH, but Thank God Sierra spared 3d Virtual Bullrider!! It was bad enough to see B5 axed, and the LOTR game killed with a major motion picture on the way - but I really would have gone fscking nuts if they had cancelled the Bullrider game!!!

    So Daikatana sucks. It will soon be forgotten. At least John Romero could afford to buy nice tits for his girlfriend.

    I spen more time thinking about great games that died than half ass ones heading for the closeout bin at Best Buy.

    1. Re:When good games die while bad games live. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pic: Actually I pay my own way. Always have. Thanks. -stevie

  48. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by Lotek · · Score: 1

    Um, he didn't leave, he was fired.

  49. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by jon_c · · Score: 1
    . I think this was an incredible learning experience for John Romero

    Gee isn't that a nice way to say "sorry you suck, loser?"

    From what I've heard around the grape vine (aka stuck in traffic with my roommate). Romero is the wana-bee elite coder that Carmak is. Romero has a very posh office, he enjoys starbucks and power lunches. While Carmak actually produced shit. He was busy making people believe he produced shit.

    The way is works at any job I've been at is the general impression of how much work you actually do is about 80% BS and about 20% real work,. Or maybe 90/10. ether case I have a feeling Romero is a craft master at the > percentage and just plain talent-less at real work. Maybe he saw this as a way to prove to people he doesn't suck shit.

    Looks like it was a pretty big mistake.

    -Jon

    Damm that sheit be scandalous

    --
    this is my sig.
  50. Looks like FreeBSD by terracon · · Score: 1

    Looks like they run freebsd + apache. Check out what netcraft comes back with
    http://www.netcraft.com/whats/?host=www.sharkyex treme.com

  51. Re:FPS plots by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

    Ran Marathon I on a IIsi with 16Mhz.

    The frame rate was painfully slow and evil.
    Just to be safe. I wouldn't go below 33Mhz. for any Marathon!

    I didn't know what I was missing until I tried the Trilogy pack on my 6400 Performa/ 180 Mhz.

    Just wish Forge was a little better.

  52. glaring omission by latro · · Score: 1

    uh, Marathon? And it seems as though you did have a Mac at some point, so platform issues should be no excuse.

    -------

    --

    -------

    "It was people! People soiled our green!"
  53. Re:Diakatana Truly is a bad game by Mr.+Klaw · · Score: 1

    He said "properly balanced". The Redeemer is suicide to use at close-to-mid range, and you only get *one* rocket before you have to pick it up again. And it's slow.

    As for the BFG, it used up tons of ammo and was slow to fire, and a sufficiently smart player knew how to avoid it: You got out of the directional cone originating from the firing player. He fires north, you run south as fast as you fucking can. Both were properly balanced weapons.

    The powerful weapons in DK are the same way. You'll only get 2 shots with them, and ammo is nowhere to be found. They are avoidable by a sufficiently skilled player who would run out of view of a player who had them. They have a long delay before firing. They are also suicide if there is no one else to kill. So they have the added benifit that if the person misses, they'll be dead or close to it.
    I have to wonder how much some of these people have actually played with the weapons.

    --
    -- "Well, Hello, Mr. Fancy-pants. I've got news for you pal, you ain't in control but two things right now, Jack and s
  54. Romero threw away any right to dignity LONG ago! by P_Simm · · Score: 2
    Do the words 'SUCK IT' ring a bell?

    I don't care how long it took him, or how much work he put into it, or how it's his heart and soul and he's going to get a complex because his game gets bashed. He called us his bitch. He threw down the gauntlet years ago. Now his game is out, and 99% of the gaming population thinks it sucks shit. We have EVERY right to pick that gauntlet back up and beat the hell outta him with it.

    Lesson to the game industry: If you're going to insult the gaming public with your desires for oral sex, you DAMN WELL better make the best game EVER.

    You know what to do with the HELLO.

    --

    You know what to do with the HELLO.
    Help create an open-source world ...

  55. Thoughts on Romero by CDanek · · Score: 1

    Romero is a fantastic public figure. That's about it. Romero is primarily a figurehead, I honestly doubt that he could run a project such as this well. Reason being? He simply goofs around too much. John Romero is the _only_ popular 3DFPS developer that insists on making the occasional IRC visit. He constantly shows up to press events and interviews. He loses to well publicized matches against other FPS 'celebrities' (anyone remember killcreek? I'm sure you do, she's in playboy this month).

    "It was dreadfully apparent that neither Romero or Wilson had ever played Age of Empires outside of once or twice, and both were aptly defeated by Shelley, with Wilson resigning first.
    The second tournament -- Gods, Mortals, and a Beta Tester - was a bit more exciting."
    Tim Deen, a programmer from ES, finally won the second match.

    (from here)


    He faked his own death. His constant antics and shows only show us what kind of person he is; an actor, someone who enjoys being in the limelight. It comes as absolutely NO surprise that daikatana failed, I was telling people this years ago when he insisted on coming to IRC to 'gauge' what's going on in the community. John, don't you have some work to do or something?

  56. Re:from Ion Storm employee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I propose "Linux Syndrome."

  57. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Why the hell is Romero entitled to my understanding or support? He turned out a crap game, after wasting really horrific amounts of resources that could have been channeled in much more constructive directions, and to top it all off the arrogant bastard hyped his game by telling us he was going to make us his bitch.

    There are any number of proven game developers out there that could have made Daikatana a fun, innovative game. I'm not going to speculate what he did with the time he wasn't spending running his company, but having seen the pictures of his girlfriend I think I've got a pretty good guess.

    Who's the bitch now, John?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  58. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by SedentaryZ · · Score: 3
    The review on Sharky's extreme that was linked here *was* a constructive criticism of the game. It went into pretty good detail about the game's problems.

    Remember, Daikatana was a high visibility project started by (at the time) one of the most influential people in PC gaming. Can you recall the "Romero is going to make you his bitch!" advertising campaign? With all the hype generated by ION Storm for this game, I'm not surprised to see reviews that don't pull any punches in reporting on the weak points of this game. "Suck it down??" You got that right.

    The big question that I have is wondering if EIDOS is going to recover *any* of their investment in ION with this game. Is the negative pub from this game going to affect ION's other upcoming releases? Is someone who actually buys the game going to be so turned off that he'll never buy another ION game?

    At some point within the past year they had to realize that the game simply wasn't going to work - someone should have pulled the plug on this thing over a year ago.

  59. And for a funny look. . . by lemuru · · Score: 2

    Jeff K. has a positively hysterical comparison between Ghouls and Ghosts and Daikatana.

    1. Re:And for a funny look. . . by sddefrag · · Score: 1

      OMG, this article sums it all up! Killcreek's maps do look better, since they have the 4 bit color depth. Somehow, after playing (and yes, completing) the Daikatana demo, I really do see the similarities between it and 'Gouls 'n Ghosts'. They both use 8bit color and some of the same weapons. ALERT: I have scattered sarcasm throughout this reply, so don't try and flame me with, '...where do u get 8bit textures from?! Daikatana uses 4 bit textures u idiot!'.

  60. I Hope This Means the End of FPS by rob1imo · · Score: 1
    The world has devolved enough -- it's time for the madness to stop.

    In the eary 80's, there was much paranoia and fear of bugs/aliens/ghosts/etc., exemplified by games such as Centipede, Space Invaders, and Pac-Man. Fast forward ten years, and all of a sudden these creatures seem to be given higher regard than human beings, both socially and in the context of video games!

    Face it -- FPS will go the way of shoot-em-up, and become exclusively the domain of high school CS projects, trivial amusements to play on emulators, or will be completely crushed of their original spirit in Microsoft Arcade 2015. Think about it...

    On the lighter side, I have heard that Daikatana will soon be released as "dumpware" and GPL'd. RMS will adopt the code as the official GNU game. Its new name will be: YAFPS -- take a guess at what that means.

    --

    --

    1. Re:I Hope This Means the End of FPS by psylence · · Score: 1

      aahaha no shit :)

  61. Re:There is one simple criteria. by jafac · · Score: 1

    I don't know. Compared to the story presented in Marathon, Marathon 2, and Marathon Infinity, Half-Life was pretty lame.

    I just wish Bungee had put some effort into the engine in the process of going from Marathon to Marathon Infinity. That's why these games were so relatively unknown.

    I just remembered this old Metallica song. . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  62. Non-existent AI by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3

    I've only played the demo (right through, though, unlike some people) and I was somewhat underwhelmed. I always compare FPS games with Half-Life, admittedly my favourite game ever (have a look here for what I'm doing with it), so be warned...

    The game looks alright, although the coloured lighting is overused at points. The enemies look fairly good, although they don't seem to have many triangles compared with other games. They do look reasonably solid, unlike some. Graphically, not bad - but that's not the problem.

    It's the enemy AI. The enemies in Doom are more intelligent than these ones. They get stuck around corners. At one point, I stood just round a pillar while a load of robotic mosquitoes piled up, unable to navigate eight world units to their right in order to fly around. They're stupid compared with Doom's enemies, and utterly brain-dead compared with Half-Life's.

    When an enemy in a computer game attacks, I don't want it to advance straight towards me where I can gun it down before it reaches me, I want it to show at least some hint of realistic behaviour. I love fights where I have to plan what to do beforehand, and probably take cover and retreat if necessary. Daikatana did not require any such strategy - just mindless standing and shooting. Occasionally I would move to the left or right while shooting, just to add a bit of variation, but it was rarely necessary to do so.

    Daikatana's first, swamp-based episode specialises in ultra-annoying enemies that sneak up and nibble on you. Incredibly annoying to kill - they move reasonably quickly and are difficult to see. Contrast this with Half-Life's headcrabs, which move very slowly, then pounce at your face - you can actually see when they're attacking.

    The sidekicks aren't quite as bad as some people keep making out - although I imagine they could get pretty stuck in places, and get in the way in others. It's a nice idea, but by no means original. Half-Life had scientists and security guards, while its Opposing Force mission pack put you alongside soldiers which would fight with you. The sidekick AI in Daikatana seemed similar to the Half-Life security guards, which was fine for short periods, but would be pretty annoying for an entire game...

    In a way, it's intriguing to compare Half-Life and Daikatana. Both are first games, both were dramatically behind schedule, both attempt to tell a story, and change the way we think about FPS-style games. Unfortunately, while Half-Life succeeds in a spectacular manner, Daikatana fails miserably...

    Oh well. Time to wait for the release of Half-Life 1.1 and Worldcraft 3.3... :-)

    Ford Prefect

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  63. Re:I know what John Romero can do next... by FigWig · · Score: 1

    I think I played a demo for it before. Didn't it have neural networks so that the NPCs could learn or something? That's all I can recall.

    --
    Scuttlemonkey is a troll
  64. Re:FPS plots by Haven · · Score: 2

    What about an expansion for Daikatana that is downloadable for free. It creates a dimensional rift that gives gamers their money back.

  65. Oh, my mistake ... by P_Simm · · Score: 2
    I forgot, it was 'SUCK IT DOWN', not 'SUCK IT'. I can't believe I forgot it - after all, they did trademark the phrase. (Damn you Old Man Murray ... you don't have the story in your archive for me to link to.)

    Add to all this the fact that the death of Looking Glass must be avenged. It's official, Ion Storm must die.

    You know what to do with the HELLO.

    --

    You know what to do with the HELLO.
    Help create an open-source world ...

  66. Re:non-biased? by jpowers · · Score: 1

    That's why it's in quotes. Alters the context.

    Example: 1. He's a good speller.

    meaning: that man can spell well.

    2. He's a "good speller."

    meaning: that man is barely literate.

    tricky, eh?

    -jpowers

    --

    -jpowers
  67. Re:Brother, can you spare a neuron? (OT, ignore) by TBHiX · · Score: 1

    No implication intended, or should be taken. For the record, my meatspace name is identical to one of the members of the Circle Jerks; doesn't mean I'm planning to start a punk band anytime soon. And when name choices are limited to monosyllabic semi-onomapatoics (sp?), there's only so many ways one can go.

    FWIW, Ogg-my-alter-ego has a long track record, dating back to his first appearance as the psychic caveman reporter in a board game based on tabloids. Just in case you found that funny.

    -TBHiX-

  68. Re:from Ion Storm employee? by Moofie · · Score: 2

    At first, I thought it might be Romero himself, but the poster didn't say "bitch" once, so it can't be.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  69. What killer? by Richthofen · · Score: 1

    I think the absolute worst thing about this whole story is that Daikatana was originally suppose to be a "Quake Killer" (Yes, check your game magazines from 4 years ago ;-). Well, how many Quakes have been released since then? I haven't played it, but from what I read and hear I don't even think its better then the original Quake.

    Its really sad about Looking Glass, Thief was an excellent game; something that Daikatana is not.


    Josh

  70. good games? by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

    Innovation in gameplay isn't worth the CD blanks.

    Most of the profit from game publishing comes from the first couple of weeks of sales, before anyone gets much of a chance to play it. Hype, hot screenshots (whether or not they're from a pre-rendered cutscene), and a cool cardboard box sell copies. (the only exceptions are a few gamedev idols, like id, that everybody buys)

    It's an inherently incompetent economic system, where demand has nothing to do with quality.

    --
    /.
  71. Re:FPS plots by Rendor · · Score: 1

    I agree, Marathon simply blew all other FPS games away with it's plot. Dealing with Durandal as he was sometimes helpful, sometimes manipulative, sometimes insane was the best overall gameplay experience I've had in a FPS by far.

    Marathon was also a leader in the technology, being the first FPS I ever saw with mouselook. Although it was more limited than what is seen now, it totally spoiled me to the point that I could never bring myself to play Doom seriously. Only after Quake and Duke included mouselook on the PC did I consider another FPS seriously.

  72. How about... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    Wolfenstein 3D? The last King's Quest (8? Can't remember the name...)? Or how about Gate Crasher for the CoCo 3 (don't believe me? Go here)?

    OK, maybe that is stretching it - but you do seem to have played, by far, a great number of FPS's...

    Actually, all I wanted to do was put in a comment that the CoCo could do an FPS (at 2 MHz and 512K of RAM - woohoo!)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:How about... by 1200 · · Score: 1
      Yes, I played Wolfenstein 3D also -- just forgot it.

      King's Quest, however, you got me on. I watched a co-worker play that for hours, but that doesn't really count, I suppose.

    2. Re:How about... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

      The last one (full 3D action - it did have the ability to go first person with a hot key, though it was far easier to play 3rd person)?

      While not a game that revolved around fighting all the time, you did have to get into "sword fights" and crossbow fights as you went deeper into the game, as well as solve puzzles. True, the whole game didn't revolve around the fighting aspect (which the games you mentioned do), but in my mind it should still qualify.

      Or, maybe it is a whole different genre - one that hasn't been fully explored yet. I don't know what to call it, but it goes beyond interactive fiction - it was almost a true interactive movie, in a sense - or maybe you could call it interactive Machinima (or however that is spelled)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  73. Re:There is one simple criteria. by DaveWood · · Score: 1
    Absolutely! Unsung heroes in the industry, Bungie has consistently kicked all kinds of ass. They are brilliant. And me, and all the people I work with, have spent WAY too much time playing the marathons.

    We still play it here. And on a G4, well, let's just say... slight overkill. :)

  74. Everquest? by addbo · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think the screen shots look kind of like Everquest graphics? I thought the game would look better than that... so much time an money...

  75. Re:FPS plots by DaveWood · · Score: 1
    Dude. Let me just say it again. How fucking cool is Marathon? It's fucking cool. Those guys are still the kings.

    Speaking of which, my guess is (from having followed Halo like a slave, and seen their demo at E3), at least one connection between the Marathon "universe" and Halo is that, just as in Marathon, your character in Halo will be a military cyborg. But if the Bungie guys leave it at that, I'll be surprised. :)

  76. Re:Half-life multiplayer by DaveWood · · Score: 1
    Agreed. I have three things to say to you:
    1. Action Quake
    2. Action Half-life
    3. Action UT
    'nuff said.
  77. FPS plots by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 5

    They're all pretty similar, really...

    Doom: Experiments involving dimensional portals go wrong, creating a rift between our world and Hell. Generic gun-toting, solitary marine goes on a rampage, killing lots of nasties, and travels into the other dimension to kill more nasties before killing the big evil overlord monster (a great big wobbly brain).

    Quake: Experiments involving dimensional portals go wrong, creating a rift between our world and various undefined dimensions. Generic gun-toting, solitary marine goes on a rampage, killing lots of nasties, and travels into the other dimensions to kill more nasties before killing the big evil overlord monster (a great big wobbly jelly).

    Half-Life: Experiments involving dimensional portals go wrong, creating a rift between our world and a mysterious alien world called Xen. Generic gun-toting, solitary theoretical physicist goes on a rampage, killing lots of nasties, and travels into Xen to kill yet more nasties before killing the big evil overlord monster (a great big wobbly foetus thing).

    Admittedly, Half-Life has a few more plot details which are pretty cool, but it's still remarkably familiar... :-)

    Ford Prefect

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    1. Re:FPS plots by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1


      I've never played Marathon, but it sounds pretty cool. Is it reasonably easy to get hold of second-hand? I've got a couple of (admittedly elderly) Macs at home I got for free from my dad's office, but I doubt that a 32MHz 030 is quite enough. Is a PC version available?

      Anyway, Halo sounds great - and I've got a moderately powerful PC to play it on. :-)

      Ford Prefect

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:FPS plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That should be EXPERIMENTAL physicist damn it.

      I hope you wouldn't expect to actually see a theorist in a lab.

    3. Re:FPS plots by zeck · · Score: 1

      Marathon Infinity was essentially just an add-on for Marathon 2. The only really significant engine improvement was the ability to automatically switch monitor resolution so it runs fullscreen. If your LCIII ran Marathon 2, it would run Marathon Infinity.

    4. Re:FPS plots by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1


      Nah - Gordon Freeman must have been a theoretical physicist. It explains why the experiment went so utterly and totally wrong... :-)

      Ford Prefect

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    5. Re:FPS plots by zeck · · Score: 1

      A 32Mhz 030 is fine for classic Marathon. It won't be real fast, but it'll be playable. There is a PC version of Marathon 2.

    6. Re:FPS plots by Darchmare · · Score: 2

      Marathon I and II ran pretty well on my LCIII, which was a 25 Mhz '030. A 33Mhz one should be just fine.

      As for Infinity, it's hard to say. I never tried it.

      Now, when I tried running Marathon on my mom's 16 Mhz '020 LC on the other hand... Heh. Now that sucked.


      - Jeff A. Campbell
      - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

      --

      - Jeff
    7. Re:FPS plots by jafac · · Score: 5

      and for those who didn't play Marathon:

      Marathon: Earth's first colony ship, the Marathon, made from a hollowed-out asteroid, at the end of it's sub-light journey to a nearby star-system, is attacked by aliens bent on taking over the ship, destroying the nascent human colony on the planet below, and finding out where it came from so they can enslave humanity. The aliens are slavers, and have many races of slaves working for them. You are a super-killer cyborg, a military weapon, and it's your job to save the ship. You are sometimes aided by three AI's aboard the ship, who provide you with information, teleport you hither and yon, supply you with weapons, or become unresponsive or turn against you as the aliens hack into them. Later you find out that Durandal, one of the AI's actually was mad, signalled the alien scout ship, used you to get himself transmitted to the alien ship, and take it over, thus giving him the ability to travel faster than light - then use you and the alien ship to travel to an alien outpost, ex-home planet of one of the slave races, to uncover the secret to a technology that will allow Durandal to escape the eventual collapse of the universe in 12 billion years. (when you're an AI, and think yourself otherwise immortal, I guess you start pondering such problems).

      Next - funny you should ask - comes Halo:, I've seen some kick ass demos, the plotline is based around a ringworld (smaller than Larry Niven's orbiting a gas giant, not constructed around it). Supposedly there's a plot tie-in to Marathon, but the details haven't leaked yet.

      I just remembered this old Metallica song. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:FPS plots by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      I managed to make Marathon I work on a Performa 460. That's a 33MHz 030.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  78. NYT article about this - a year ago by Malc · · Score: 2

    /. linked to this article in the New York Times over a year ago. Good article - it looks like the questions posed are answered: it's all John Carmack and no Romero. Don't laugh too hard at the picture of Romero at the top of the page... I almost fell out of my chair and hurt myself.

    1. Re:NYT article about this - a year ago by tealover · · Score: 1

      Romero is 31, with long, silky black hair. He wears tight designer jeans and a black T-shirt, and has the slightly pudgy frame of someone who has spent a lifetime staring at computer screens while drinking Cokes and eating candy bars

      I laughed when I read that but once I looked at my body I started crying.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
  79. I'm no gaming expert, but... by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    "If [the AI sidekicks] die, the game ends."

    Is this standard operating procedure for games nowadays? If so, it's just about the dumbest thing I've ever heard of. Say I'm playing along great and suddenly the AI sidekick does something dumb and gets killed. There goes my game. Who's skill are we testing here, anyway? If I wanted to pit AI vs AI, I'd hook Eliza up to NetHack.
    --
    Wanna hook MAPI clients to your Tru64/AIX/Linux server?

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  80. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by emerson · · Score: 5

    The actual quote goes: "The first 90% of the job takes the first 90% of the time. The last 10% of the work takes the other 90% of the time." When said that way, it better points out how the picky nature of the final details is usually the problem, not the misjudgment of how much work there was to do.

    Given either interpretation of the quote, though, Romero gets no sympathy from me. In a competitive marketplace, there's no "gold star for trying."

    Romero and Ion Storm had AMPLE opportunity to realize that they were making a bad game. They had more time than any other computer game in history to take a couple steps back and give a long look to their product with an eye to improving or replacing it. They didn't. They dropped the ball in an incredibly competitive market, a market they chose to compete in, regardless of the risks involved.

    This isn't the Special Olympics, the gaming market doesn't run on the "everyone's a winner on the inside" philosophy. More the "can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen" philosophy.

    (*shrug) It's the ugly facts of life, but calling out that a game is just poo, when in fact it is, is not a bad attitude, it's the free market in action.
    --

  81. from Ion Storm employee? by god_of_the_machine · · Score: 1

    "It's $29.99 at most stores."

    Anybody else wondering if the above post was made by an Ion Storm employee? You gotta love AC's!

    -rt-

    --

    -rt-
    ** Evil Canadians are taking over the world. Learn about the conspiracy
    1. Re:from Ion Storm employee? by emmons · · Score: 1

      as unpopular a view it may be... I'd have to second that motion.



      -----

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    2. Re:from Ion Storm employee? by cruelworld · · Score: 2

      It was probably made by an actual Diakatana fan.

      Some people enjoy the game, which is disturbing. But even scarier Diakatana has this strange affect on a small, rabidly-loyal group of gamers. These are people who have been playing the old demo for over a year and write up hideously long and ugly fan pages for each other about how elite they are how the new demo/game isn't as good as the old, yadda yadda yadda. They all worship Romero as a god and curse the demon Carmack.
      very odd.

      It's very much like the Amiga syndrome. i.e. the Amiga addicts who to this day will insist their 68040 amigas out-perform a P3 and that Zorro slots are better than PCI, and that Dave Hayne will one day lead the army of Rightenous against the Wicked....

      I don't know if there's an official name for this type of behavior but I propose "Amiga Syndrome".

    3. Re:from Ion Storm employee? by ckedge · · Score: 1

      > eaten up the past few weeks of my time, as well as the time of my friends, who
      > rarely read forums or go to gaming websites, who have no idea who John Romero
      > is, and have no idea how long it should/shouldn't take to make a game

      The above quote is our biggest hint. My theory is that people who enjoy the game are simply people who don't know how poorly DK compares to all other recent games, people who don't know what they're missing.

      Note that this isn't a dig against them. Imagine if you had never played FPS or action games any time in the last 3-5 years, say since Doom. Now you come across DK. Wow, wouldn't you be impressed!? Me too.

      And the game reviews sort of hint that as well, I mean, they flat out state that the biggest problem with DK is that it's an N years old game engine, design, puzzles, gameplay, and graphics, that's been heavily surpassed by more recent stuff.

      So it's not supprising that some people will enjoy it. There *are* a few thousand people out there who have, for one reason or other, for better or worse, bought the merely average games this season. Some won't be happy with their purchase, some will. The distribution between happy and unhappy (impressed and un-impressed) will shift with their experience, expectations, and the quality (or lack thereof) of the game.

  82. System Shock 2 does everything better by Osmosis · · Score: 1

    All right, so Daikatana sucks. No big surprise there, at least not for those who both follow and believe the rumors. Eidos loses money. Looking Glass goes out of business. What really sucks about this is that System Shock 2 not only looked better (IMO, of course) but also played better, had better weapons, better enemies (even though there were fewer) and had a stat-and-XP system that actually made sense and influenced the game.

    I know I'm comparing apples and oranges a bit, but I get so pissed off when I think how many great games LGS could have made for the money sunk into ION.

    --
    "I like to sit and cry in front of my T.V." -- T.V. Song - Moondog Jr.
  83. The more viewpoints we get, the better they agree by stevarooski · · Score: 1

    Yup, as a not-so-proud player of the demo, John Romero can spend the rest of my life washing my car. I might even tip him a quarter if he waxes.

    Here's a hilarious and well-written review of the game that hits it right on the nose: Mo' Diakatana!

    -S

    http://students.washington.edu/steve0/
    steve0@u.washington.edu

    --

    - - - - - - - -
    Don't worry, being eaten by a crocodile is just like going to sleep in a giant blender.
  84. Re:I know what John Romero can do next... by Alpha+State · · Score: 1

    Battlecruiser wasn't that bad except for 2 things:

    • It took about 3 weeks to learn how to play decently. Most people would give up after finding out that their ship won't do anything because they forgot to have any crew members sleep for 2 weeks on end, but I persevered.
    • Its stability sucked. Not that it crashed a lot, but it took a miracle to get it to run at all. Probably more microsoft's fault, but anyone trying to use DOS mode under win 98 needs a brainscan.

    It's a reasonable game, but not worth the pain.

  85. Re:Just what was the deal with BC3000? by Upsilon · · Score: 1

    It's quite simply really. BC3K was quite possibly the buggiest game ever created in the history of the universe. I am not exagerating, I'm serious. BC3K redefines bugginess. Everything that could go wrong did, and then some.

    --
    I am not an idiot. Please use my name to email me.

    "That's right, I'm quoting myself."

    -Upsilon

  86. another side of the coin... by frknfrk · · Score: 2

    Well the game looks like a perfect fit for someone like me, even if it is 'Quake 2'. For one, at least it's a few different maps. Second, it runs on an NT machine which doesn't happen to be owned by someone with enough cash to drop on a P-III and a massive video card. And, you can get Daikatana from buy.com for $32.94 plus shipping. Using one of these coupons and the price goes down to $22.94 plus shipping or $32.94 with no shipping. Thanks to pricescan.com and amazing-bargains.com for finding the price and coupon, respectively. The point being, go out, buy the game, judge for yourself. If nothing else the story, whatever its faults, seems original enough to perhaps at least prod the FPS world out of the 'boom boom boom' mode (even if not in the same way as Thief 2). Of course, nothing looks as cool as what the people over at artifact entertainment are doing: Demise and Horizons. Both labors of love in their own right. (Demise is, btw, the successor to Mordor, and was formerly called 'Infinite Worlds'.) Demise is out and ready for order, and Horizons is pretty alpha atm.

    --
    The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
  87. I almost brought it. . . by Sith+Lord+Jesus · · Score: 1

    . . .last weekend when my brother and I went out to Best Buy. I saw it sitting there on the shelves for US$40.00, but I remembered all the hell that the demo gave me--it ran slower then molasses going uphill in winter on my PII 450--and I opted for System Shock II instead for just US$19.00. Needless to say, I be a happy camper. I hope that Romero and company manage to turn their little company around, but I'm not holding my breath. I'll be waiting for Oni and especially Halo from Bungie instead. Those two look to have real promise as far as gameplay and sheer fun are concerned.

    --

  88. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 1

    Yeah, technically.

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  89. Re:I know what John Romero can do next... by Zed+Too · · Score: 1

    Oh, I remember the advert for BC3K. But then I had a reason for that :-)

  90. User Friendly by mgedmin · · Score: 1

    Today I was browsing the archives again, and I found this. Seems on-topic?

  91. Re:There is one simple criteria. by DaveWood · · Score: 1

    Fucking. Awesome.

  92. Re:I've Played Every FPS Ever Released, And... by 1200 · · Score: 1
    Yes, I've played Marathon also. Simply forgot it. And Hexen and Heretic, I also remembered later.

    I've never heard of Catacomb Abyss. Where can I find it, for I must play it.

    Same goes for Blakestone, Coco whatever, and the other one.

    I would love to locate -- and play, of course, that breakfast cereal-based Doom game. And also the Christian Doom-style game, where instead of shooting monsters you "feed" animals in Noah's Ark by shooting food at them. Anybody have info on either of these?

  93. Re:Diakatana Truly is a bad game by Glytch · · Score: 2

    He said "properly balanced". The Redeemer is suicide to use at close-to-mid range, and you only get *one* rocket before you have to pick it up again. And it's slow.

    As for the BFG, it used up tons of ammo and was slow to fire, and a sufficiently smart player knew how to avoid it: You got out of the directional cone originating from the firing player. He fires north, you run south as fast as you fucking can. Both were properly balanced weapons.

  94. Re: You are incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    Although Daikatana is indeed #5 on the Top Sales chart currently, this only measures the amount of product SHIPPED to stores, not sold. So, from the sales chart, we known Eidos has shipped lots of copies of Daikatana out to stores. What remains to be seen is how many of these copies actually are sold. Any and all product that the retailer does not want anymore (e.g - if it's not selling well) are returned to the publisher at their expense. Translation: Eidos has to buy back all unsold copies at cost. However, I do agree that there are probably large numbers of Daikatana being sold to members of the press. This is the result of Eidos capping off the number of press copies to 500.

  95. Re:DAIKATANA is the #5 selling game by Nematode · · Score: 1

    ...and the PCData chart for the same week pegged it at #18. They also listed actual figures, and they were pretty weak. It's pretty questionable to claim that Daikatana has been vindicated by the marketplace, at this point....

  96. Keep in mind Ion Storm != Daikatana by Mantle · · Score: 3
    I think a lot of people incorrectly link the failiure of Daikatana (which I agree, it is a faliure) to the failiure of John Romero. Even though he failed to create an entertaining game, he did manage to create a successful development house. Even though the company is known heavily for it's exterior image and mansion like offices, there are still many talented people that work there, such as Warren Spector and Tom Hall.

    Eidos would be fools to spend $20 Million on Daikatana and Romero alone. However, if you look at the products soon to come out of Ion Storm (Deus Ex, Anachronox), their future doesn't look so bleak.

    What John Romero did during the past 4 years was not only Daikatana, he also had to lay the foundation to develop 3 games at the same time. It's unfortunate Looking Glass had to go under because of Ion Storm (not John Romero personally) but it looks like some equally as impressive games will come out of Ion in the future.

  97. Everybody loves Daikatana! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    Everybody loves Daikatana! Look at all these great reviews:

    • Sharky sez it rawks! yeah right
    • FiringSquad: "It is absolutely inferior in almost every conceivable way."
    • Damage Gaming say: "I gave it a 3 out of 5, and that's generous"
    • CTNews: "in the end all I got was frustration"
    • GameSpot gives it a 4.6 out of 10
    • DailyRadar: "Ultimate Gas Hands. Need we say more?"
    • GameProWorld damns with faint praise: "It's not that bad."
    • Computer Games Online gives it 1.5 stars - "amateurish epic lands with a spectacular thud"
    • PC.IGN: "It's finally here. And we reviewed it. What? What else do you want us to say?"
    • Honest3D - "You all know that I didn't enjoy Soldier of Fortune - well I liked it a lot more than Daikatana."
    • GameCenter gives it a 3 out of 10: "Daikatana is a waste of your time and money. Go play Half-Life again instead."
    • Happy Puppy: "It'll make you wish it never came out at all"
    • GameZone actually seemed to kind of like it
    • GameSeek really did like it! "f I had to describe this game in a word or two I would say that it is most entertaining!"
    • Ingava didn't hate it all that much
    • Game Revolution: "[A]lthough the game is nowhere near as good as it was promoted to be, ... it is not the worst game released this year. It is, however, stunningly outdated and mediocre."
    • Maximum PC: "Four years for this?... It sucks. It sucks big-time. In fact, it sucks so bad, we have to wonder what kind of curious monstrosity the developers could have created with an eight-year product cycle.
    • GameFan: "It's not as bad as you think."
    • PCGamers.Net: "Final Score: 70 out of 100, and I'm disappointed. Sigh."
    • GamePig: "Daikatana isn't a bad game, and was often fun to play. However, it's got several flaws that kept me from really enjoying it."

    If you're at all curious about how the hell this happened, GameSpot has a great article called "Knee Deep in a Dream: The Story of Daikatana" that gives all the gorey details. They also have a complete walk-through, though the concept kinda makes me shudder...

    --
    Anonymous cowards are looking forward to the DVD letterboxed release of Ishtar

  98. A frag is a frag is a frag. by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    I'll cheerfully fire the sucker at close range if all three of my opponents are in the same room. Hell, if the game allowed it, I'd even blow MY own head off. It's like Dr. Strangelove's Doomsday Machine or what I prefer to call a backyard bomb. A backyard bomb needs no delivery system; if you set it off in your backyard, you can still get your enemies. Maybe they should have called the Redeemer the Kamikaze.

  99. Marathon 2 is open-sourced! by delevant · · Score: 2
    Bungie has released the Marathon 2 source code! Go here:
    http://source.bungie.org/index.html

    --
    I have no .sig, and I must scream.
  100. What's even funnier by jnderr · · Score: 1

    Killcreek wrote the strategy guide. I saw it in the store and joked, gee I wonder how they're gonna sell that, with a centerfold of Killcreek? I opened it up and sure enough there it was. On the new doom front Old Man Murray in response to the Id announcment had a link to a group of Croation developers developing a game called Serious Sam. It looks like it has promise.

  101. Re:I've Played Every FPS Ever Released, And... by steveha · · Score: 1
    The breakfast cereal-based Doom game is Chex Quest. (Chex is a breakfast cereal.) The game actually came on a CD-ROM inside the cereal box; they could afford to do this because the CD was also an AOL CD.

    If you have played Doom, you have pretty much played Chex Quest. New maps, new "skins" for monsters and weapons, a few new cut scenes, but it is still Doom.

    There also is a Chex Quest II. You downloaded this from www.chexquest.com, but it isn't there anymore.

    You don't get killed; you get slimed. You don't kill the enemies; you send them back to the dimension they came from. The weapon bound to the '1' key isn't a fist, it is a cereal-eating spoon!

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  102. I know what John Romero can do next... by Jonathan · · Score: 3

    Start a company with Derek Smart of "Battlecruiser 3000" fame!

    1. Re:I know what John Romero can do next... by Glytch · · Score: 1

      Amazing. Someone else who's heard of Battlecruiser 3000. No, I've never played it, it's just that there's a bin full of boxes for that game right next to the HD display case at the local Staples.

  103. Watch Romero Dance by N1KO · · Score: 1

    http://www.elvesontricycles.com/dance/

  104. Re:Unreal, Quake 3 by tialaramex · · Score: 1

    I was really disappointed at how few people you can fit in a Ferrari or Porsche.
    Those guys need to take some lessons on designing large passenger vehicles instead of modding a Ford Model A with the same stupid "two person" design. A bright red Ferrari is RIDICULOUSLY small. I tried to take my extended family to Wembley in one and only my sister/mother and I fitted in the car.

    If you played Quake 3 single player and were disappointed, you can go and stand in the corner with the guys who bought our "Potato server" joke.
    Quake 3 is a multi-player 3D engine for the Internet. If the "lame-ass" models aren't controlled by a Real Human Being, you're just playing a shadow of the real game.

    Buy Half-life, finish it. Done. End of $40.
    Buy Q3, play friends, join clan, play Aqua, HH, Q3F, get real on their asses. Cheaper, and better value.

  105. There is one simple criteria. by DaveWood · · Score: 5
    And it was obvious to me from the Demo that DK was going to be a dog because of it. Daikatana's story was horrible, and it is compounded by bad voice acting and bad "puzzle" design.

    It's simple, really: if you want to make a single-player game, you should, cursorily at least, check and make sure it's well written.

    Half-life was a half-baked retread by movie standards, but it was still so much better than anything anyone else had bothered to do in terms of a story and/or gameplay that everyone (including me) was entranced.

    Daikatana's creative team comes off like rank amatuers, and it's obvious from every aspect of the materials in the game. The fact that their management skills/kung fu weren't the best is just sad and/or ironic. But, we had fair warning. This is the guy, after all, who founded his company on the whiny, middle-school notion (I paraphrase) "My vision comes first. Those little technology/logistics problems are secondary."

    Daikatana is just another creative embarrassment in a long line of such writing/designing disasters that are basically making the American video game industry a lot like the Japanese movie industry of days gone by. Except that Godzilla didn't look so blocky.

    There's nothing remarkable about it, either. It will stay that way until the industry's fusion with the rest of the entertainment industry moves farther along, at which point we will go from the Godzilla phase to... er... the Independence Day phase? Ouch.

    1. Re:There is one simple criteria. by Bieeardo · · Score: 1

      As an aside, there's apparently a team working on an Unreal Tournament TC called "Marathon: Resurrection." Details are at Marathon: Resurrection, if anyone's interested.

      --

      Five tons of flax.

  106. DIE CAN LA KA by electricboy · · Score: 1

    yah, a very sick game that will make me vomit blood !! but 4 yrs is a long time ... what is happening ??? thought this game suppose to be a killer in 1st person player ??? dun think it will ... vomit ..... oh no .. gonna see specialist ...!@#@!#!@# vomit

  107. It's not as easy as you think. by Mantle · · Score: 5
    The first person shooter that took four years to make is just poo.

    This type of attitude bothers me a lot. Romero poured his heart and soul into this game, and even though it was totally over-hyped and underachieving in the end, Daikatana made it to store shelves. I think this was an incredible learning experience for John Romero and I hate to see people criticize him non-constructively. Obviously the game did not turn out the way it should have ideally, but the least people could do for his time would be polite...

    I read an interesting quote once, "Once you finish the first 90% of a project, then you have to finish the other 90%." A lot of people think John Romero is an immature partygoer that never does a full days work. I disagree. It would have been so easy to give up at the end after being delayed so many times, but he bit the bullet and saw it to the end. Congratulations to him!

    Take a look at this article to take a good look at the "Daikatana Process". It's quite long (took me an hour to read) but very in depth and thorough.

    http://www.gamespot.com/fea tures/btg-daikatana/index.html

    1. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by AftanGustur · · Score: 1

      The actual quote goes: "The first 90% of the job takes the first 90% of the time. The last 10% of the work takes the other 90% of the time." When said that way, it better points out how the picky nature of the final details is usually the problem, not the misjudgment of how much work there was to do.

      I realy don't know where you guys have been but the *real* saying is called the 20/80 principle and it goes like this:

      The first 80% of the work takes only 20% of the time, and the last 20%, 80% of the time.


      --
      Why pay for drugs when you can get Linux for free ?

      --
      echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    2. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by GypC · · Score: 2

      Frankly if I shot my mouth of about how much I could code to a bunch of developers and how l33t I was only to turn out not to be able to write a BubbleSort or create a Hash Function I'd expect to be laughed out of town and I would deserve it.

      Begging the question, "Why on Earth would you want to write a bubble sort?"

      The bubble sort is the Daikatana of sorting algorithms.



      "Free your mind and your ass will follow"
    3. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      >I think this was an incredible learning experience for John Romero and I hate to see people criticize him non-constructively. Obviously the game did not turn out the way it should have ideally, but the least people could do for his time would be polite...

      Gosh, I hope someone gives me 30 million dollars. I would even put in writing that I'll get twice, no THREE times the educational value that John Romero got out of his.

      I thought that most people are being polite. The impression that I got is sadness. That all this time we were hoping he'd pull it off. That most game developers that could bring more to the table can't find funding. That despite this game being a flop, He is still responsible for making sure his company will be successfull enough to keep everyone in it employed.

      Good luck,
      ErikZ

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    4. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by superkorn · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should get yourself an ID and log in and then you too can have moderator points and save us all from this horrbile blight of bad moderation which is apparently afflicting the site. It's not so hard to do. But I hesitate to listen to the complaints about moderation of anyone who does not participate in it themselves...

    5. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by Rombuu · · Score: 5

      This type of attitude bothers me a lot. Romero poured his heart and soul into this game, and even though it was totally over-hyped and underachieving in the end, Daikatana made it to store shelves. I think this was an incredible learning experience for John Romero and I hate to see people criticize him non-constructively. Obviously the game did not turn out the way it should have ideally, but the least people could do for his time would be polite...

      Please... there are cases when carring on in the face of adversity is admirable, and cases where it is stupid. This would obviously be one of the latter.

      If you are going to be a hot shot, leave the best job you will probably ever have, start your own company, blow ~$20 Million of other people's money, take 4 years, and turn out a piece of shit you deserve whatever ribbing you get. If, on top of all this, little things like the majority of your developers quiting one day don't make you question things, well, it shows you are lacking something in the common sense department.

      Someone poured their heart and soul into the Edsel too, and New Coke, and the Judge Dread movie, and they sucked too....

      --

      DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    6. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 1
      I don't think John Romero is an immature party-goer that never does a full days work.

      I think he's an egoistic idiot who left the company that made him famous because he mistakenly thought he was something he is not.

      And I bet he didn't learn a thing ... witness all the recent interviews.

      He set himself up for this fall, and I for one am laughing my tits off.

      --

      --
      It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
      -- Danny Vermin
    7. Re:It's not as easy as you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

      This type of attitude bothers me a lot. Romero poured his heart and soul into this game, and even though it was totally over-hyped and underachieving in the end, Daikatana made it to store shelves.

      If I spent the next 5 hours of my life working on a sculpture, it would probably look like a turd. But if I poured my heart and soul for the rest of my life into this sculpture, and it _still_ looked like a turd, guess what? IT'S STILL A PIECE OF SHIT!!

  108. It's really too bad... by freakingmoron · · Score: 1

    that Daikatana doesn't come close to being a mediocre game. Its shortcomings and inherent flaws totally make it _way_ less than average. Just goes to show that John Romero != FPS Genius. It kinda sucked too, i wanted Daikatana to be a fun game. But it turned out ultimately to be a mindless bore. The game was UGLY ugly, as opposed to Quake II's clean ugly. At some points, the textures were cluttered beyond belief, and the sidekicks are utterly useless no matter where. Still, Daikatana's at spot #5 in the weekly charts for sales... go figure. But the REAL reason for Daikatana sucking: Eidos didn't ship it in one of those funky-shaped boxes.

    --
    -freakingmoron- Have you ever imagined a world without hypothetical situations?
  109. Now I just GOTTA see it by Grokko · · Score: 1

    Ok, now I'm REALLY intrigued, and must play it. Just for camp value, like watching "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes." or "Plan 9 from outer space"

    I really must find out if it out-sucks "Battlecruiser 3000", "Mode", or "Outpost"

    Corel is rumoured to have spent $1M on "Mode", and PC Gamer was kind enough to vote it "Worst game of all time"

    However, even the simple games like 'rock-paper-scissors' can be big hits if done right. Anyone try http://www.sissyfight.com ?

  110. Diakatana by PovRayMan · · Score: 1

    Today a friend and I went to CompUSA. We were looking around at games and stuff. I pointed out Daikatana on the shelf for $40. He picked up the box and showed me the screen shots on the back. He said to me;

    "Look! It's Quake2!"

    So instead I bought Unreal Tournament. Now that I got that and Quake3, I feel someone more completed to be a newsposter on 3d-shooters.com

  111. Hmmm... by BlowChunx · · Score: 1

    sounds a lot like: 1) Apple's Copland OS 2) Intel's Merced chip. But at least Apple had the sense to cut it's losses.

  112. Yes, but... by Mantle · · Score: 2

    wouldn't you be proud of your shit?

  113. I know it sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... because it was the first blowjob I've gotten all year!
    thank you.

  114. why daikatana sucks by PotatoNO · · Score: 1

    Check out this 35-page article on the long development cycle of Daikatana and the beginnings of Ion Storm.

    The game really wasn't that bad of a concept, the problem was Romero had a totally unrealistic view of software development, and lacked management skills. It's really quite a textbook case.

  115. Just what was the deal with BC3000? by tap · · Score: 1

    I remember reading stuff about it on BBS like 8 years ago. I think I even downloaded a non-playable demo of it, but it's hard to remember.

  116. But it wasn't a review by Snaller · · Score: 1

    What lowtax is doing is playing to his audience, trying to show everyone how witty and clever he is, by his own admission he has moaned about Ion over the years, this appears to be just more of the same.

    --

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  117. Not really selling that well either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    For those of you who think Romero is having the last laugh with massive sales that were inevitable after 4 years of hype.... PCData showed 2,952 units sold in its first week. They cover about 60% of the market, which means 5,000 sold in the first week. This presumably includes many months of pre-orders. 4 years of hype gave them about $160,000 in their debut week. For better or for worse, Eidos is taking a bath.

    1. Re:Not really selling that well either by shogun · · Score: 1

      Ok thats about every game reviewer who didnt receive a complimentry copy covered then I think. They should now worry about the weeks after that when they hope for some actual gamers to buy it.

  118. Daikatana and Battlecruiser by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Ok, so the games come off as shit. So what, send em a bug report OR install that compiler gathering dust on your shelf and make one yourself (after, of course, you read C++ or ASM for Total Dipshit Scriptkiddies).

  119. Not wasted effort by crovax · · Score: 1

    When a company spends that much time on a game and they focus mostly on the mechanics then you know that the game play is going to suck. But the game will be a technological milestone.
    -----
    If my facts are wrong then tell me. I don't mind.

    1. Re:Not wasted effort by Leto+Atreides+2 · · Score: 1
      Umm... what in the seven hells are you talking about? Technological milestone? Haven't you looked at the game yourself, read any of the reviews, seen any screenshots?

      The AI is horrific.

      The graphics are horrific.

      The bugs are horrific.

      Not only does the game play suck, but it accomplishes nothing new whatsoever, save the experience system, which, while somewhat interesting, does not do anything that hasn't been done before and it's not really necessary.

      Times are bad. Children no longer obey their parents, and everyone is writing a book.

      --

      Times are bad. Children no longer obey their parents, and everyone is writing a book.
      --Cicero

  120. Tried it. by Raymond+Luxury+Yacht · · Score: 1

    Played it.

    I was underwhelmed.

    --

    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  121. Bad headline by jfedor · · Score: 1

    I know "Daikatana Sucks" isn't Slashdot's official position but it looks bad anyway.

    -jfedor

  122. Greatest Game of all time? No. Fun? Hell yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    I'm pretty far into Daikatana right now. Is it the greatest game of all time? No. Is it the most innovative and newest of technology demos on the market? No. Is there any redeeming value to the game? Yep.

    Daikatana is a lot of fun. There is enough variety in it that one rarely grows bored. All the complaints about shooting robotic mosquitos and frogs show that the people citing this as the game's downfall have not played past the first few levels. The mosquitos are gone after a level or two, as are the frogs. Never to be seen again. All enemies are like that in this game. Sooner or later, you wave goodbye to a critter, knowing that it will never grace the screen again in this game. The same goes for the weapons. As soon as you start to grow comfortable with one weapon's powers, you are thrust into a new world with all new weapons to learn.

    The game features cooperative play, as well. You and 3 of your friends can run about shooting each other "by accident."

    Level design goes from wonderful to mediocre at times. Creature design does the same. The skins on the creatures can be amazing, though. Lots of Doom-y skulls, faces, demony things on the textures.

    It's great fun. It's $29.99 at most stores. It's eaten up the past few weeks of my time, as well as the time of my friends, who rarely read forums or go to gaming websites, who have no idea who John Romero is, and have no idea how long it should/shouldn't take to make a game.

    Not only have I reccomended it to close friends, I will continue to reccomend this game to others. Nobody I have encouraged to buy this game has come back upset...but they have come back with only 3 hours of sleep due to trying to get out of Greece for hours on end, battling Ray Harryhausen style skeletons and nekkid chicks.

    Your mileage may vary.

  123. Gamespot's quote says it all by mav[LAG] · · Score: 2
    Gamespot's piece quotes Romero as saying something like this (paraphrased by me because I couldn't be bothered to c&p):

    "I saw what id did with six people in nine months on Quake. I extrapolated that and reckoned we could do better in seven months with more people."

    Can you say Brooks' Law?

    --
    --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  124. I've Played Every FPS Ever Released, And... by 1200 · · Score: 3
    It's true. I have played every FPS ever released. Even the bad ones. All the way to the end. Here, to establish my credentials, is all the ones I can think of. My thoughts on Daikatana will follow.

    Doom, DoomII, Final Doom (in both PC, Mac,Playstation, and N64 versions) Quake (PC, Sega, N64 + the two expansions packs) QuakeII (plus Juggernaut, Ground Zero, and Zaero expansions), Quake3Arena, Unreal and all expansions, Half-Life (aae), Duke Nukem (PC, Mac, PSX, and N64 +expansions), Goldeneye, Star Wars (the 2 PC ones and the N64 one, Blood, Blood 2, System Shock 1+2, Soldier of Fortune, Nam,Powerslave (PSX), Spec Ops, Shadow Warrior,Sin, Thief, Thief II, Shogo M.A.D, Brahma Force: Assault on Beltlogger 9 (PSX), Klingon Honor Guard, Alien Trilogy, Alien Vs. Predator (plus bonus levels), Redneck Rampage (and all expansions), Requiem, Kingpin, Mortyr, and an old PSX one that involved the use of "psionics."

    And now, Daikatana. It really is a very bad game. Ugly, monotonous, frustrating (in the bad sense of the word). And the worst voice-over acting since "Shadow Warrior," which featured the famous potentially-offensive stereotypical "inscrutable Chinaman."

    The closest I've seen to a game this bad was "Nam," a Doom-engine piece of crap with an intriguing box.

    Some people have said the problem with Daikatana was that it was too ambitious. Nonsense. Shadows of the Empire, for the N64, was too ambitious, with too many different types of gameplay. And I still enjoyed it.

    It's too bad someone with a fresh pair of eyes didn't look at Daikatana before it was too late and suggest that they alter it so that your "helpers" -- Superfly Johnson and Mikiko -- would instead be hostages that you have to escort to safety. Because that's what you end up doing.

    The AI for helpers is doable. Kingpin did it well. So did Half-life.

    And it's not a matter of Daikatana just not being able to live up to the hype. Because I'm very easily satisfied with an FPS of any kind. I even liked Klingon Honor Guard. And Mortyr!

    So if you want something resembling what Daikatana was supposed to be, track down a copy of the old PSX game "Powerslave," an FPS set in ancient Egypt. Or "Requiem," another excellent game with a good story that didn't get much attention.

    And if you bothered to read the list of FPS's I've played, and there's one missing: Trust me -- I've played it. On second thought, let me know: the thought that there's an FPS I haven't played yet excites me in a way Daikatana never will.

  125. Time Travel is the big feature? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

    Why is it that all the reviewers seem to heap glowing praise on Diakatana for it's "unique time-travel aspects"? They seem to think that if it wasn't for the crappy execution, the idea would have been original and worthwhile.

    Doesn't anyone remember the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles arcade game? Turtles in Time? (Also release on SNES as TMNT4) Sure it was back in the early 90's but c'mon...to the best of my knowledge it was the first game not about time travel to incorporate time travel.

    It was also a damn good game. From 2500000 BC up to 2030 back to (then) present 1992. A fun filled romp through time.

    Bah. I understand that reviewers may be desperate for SOMETHING good to say but...please...time travel is old hat for movies AND video games...so enough already.

    - JoeShmoe

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-=-=-

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  126. Re:Offensive Stereotypes by Bieeardo · · Score: 1
    In case anyone missed the local cluetrain, the rant is as much of a joke as Daikatana. I mean, arguing linguistics, causation, and Suspension of Disbelief as related to a bad game intro is supposed to be taken seriously? Please.

    Oh, and please don't get me started on Star Dreck.

    --

    Five tons of flax.

  127. Direct link to MODE review by jpowers · · Score: 1

    Here's the review. Standard review for culture so bad it presents nothing interesting to talk about: the reviewer tells a story about himself instead. Cruel, but not rising to OldManMurray's subterranean level by any means.

    and here's the response. Standard response from an "artist" who uses his wit (well, half of it) to cover up genuinely hurt feelings. Sort of sad.

    -jpowers

    --

    -jpowers
  128. Diakatana Truly is a bad game by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    I've played this, and I must say that I have several complaints right off the bat:
    1. The guns are WAYYYYY to powerful and not properly balanced. One should not have the ability to kill an entire room (albeit a small room) of people with one shot from a particular weapon.
    2. Its graphics were nice, but things were too snazzy, zippy, flashy.
    3. The first 30 minutes of gameplay are way too abstract for most people to grasp. It took me that long to figure out if I was the agressor or "lone survivor" (read HalfLife).

    All in all, it was a bad game.