Slashdot Mirror


Spammer Gets Spammed

William L. Jones sent us a link to a wired story about spammers getting what they deserve: it amused me. What also amuses me is my new hobby: I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers. Empty. Eat that! 30 cents out of your pocket! Yeah! I guess now that we've evolved past sword fights, I need something to vent steam.

389 comments

  1. Re:Don't just send them empty! by sharkey · · Score: 1

    How about a print-off of the I Love You Virus? It's several pages long.

    (OT sidenote) Some of our lusers ran I Love You, and had fax numbers in their address books, so our fax server got 60+ faxes to various people consisting of I Love You, and sent the code as text, 7-8 pages of it. Funny as hell.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  2. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    >the spammer [..] may be in his business because
    > of factors outside his control like debt or
    > bills for an illness in the family, etc

    Why, I had not thought of that, and I thank you for bringing it to my attention in such an impressively verbose manner. I find myself filled with an all encompassing love for the spammer subspecies. Let's all hug.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  3. Re:Remember... by Kintanon · · Score: 4

    I was a Telemarketer for 3 months. I enjoyed it, the pay was good, and the more weird calls or ranting people I got the better. If someone had a good line to screw with me for a while it made my night interesting. I loved getting snappy comebacks before a hangup or anything out of the ordinary. So please, do Telemarketers a favor when they call you late at night, don't just hang up on them, say something witty or obscene THEN hang up on them. It actually does make the night more amusing.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  4. Don't send empties by chris\ · · Score: 2

    Don't bother sending empty envelopes. Be sure you cut up their literature, old newspapers, etc, into small peices and shove them into the envelope until it can't take anymore.

    For phone soliciters, passing them off just isn't fun. You've gotta play with them for a while first. I usually give them a quiz about their product/service they'd like to sell (throwing in my own made up words as I go along) and see how well they do. Usually, they hang up before me ;)

    As for the spammers, those bastards got what was coming to them.

    1. Re:Don't send empties by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, "Revenge on the Telemarketers", by Tom Mabe. Great CD.

      No, man, you're the Angel of Death!

      --

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  5. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by QuMa · · Score: 1

    This isn't about punishment, or revenge. This is about making a business model we disaprove of non-beneficial to those who would attempt using it.

  6. Re:Awesome link! by HerrNewton · · Score: 2

    I once got a piece of mail with only my name on it. Then again, it was across-town mail in a town of 250...

    ----

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  7. Yeah, yeah by dubl-u · · Score: 3

    The reason that people take some joy in this is that UUNET is considered to be pretty lackadaisical about fighting spam. Whatever their corporate mouthpieces say, their behavior suggests that they don't consider spam to be that big a problem. Or at least that they consider it to be somebody else's problem. Now perhaps they'll take it more seriously.

    Note that this is probably not "an eye for an eye", in that nobody spammed them specifically to punish them for their previous spammer-friendly behavior; it appears that they just got buried in a normal spam run, the same kind of spam run that originates from their network all too frequently.

    This is more akin to a policeman on the night watch who parks his squad car and takes an illicit nap, finding on waking that somebody stole his tires. There is a certain poetic justice that's less "an eye for an eye" than "what goes around, comes around".

    Few would vote for raping the rapist, but equally few will shed tears for the rapist who, in spite of our efforts to prevent rape, is raped by a bigger, meaner rapist. Buddhists work to end the suffering of all sentient beings, but that doesn't mean they can't appreciate the beautiful symmetry of karmic balance.

    1. Re:Yeah, yeah by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
      > This is more akin to a policeman on the night watch who parks his squad car and takes an illicit nap, finding on waking that somebody stole his tires. There is a certain poetic justice that's less "an eye for an eye" than "what goes around, comes around".

      Or, more appropriately, to find a "no parking" ticket on his windshield...

      --
      Say no to software patents.
  8. Re:Tape "postage garanted" postcards to bricks by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    If it doesn't fit in the envelope, the post office wont deliver it - any more.

    You might want to try a different approach. Put an old sock, piece of cheese, or something else that will make the envelope look like it contains something largish (without being unable to close the envelope.) Seal it with several wraps of scotch tape. And put words "Caution: Rattlesnake eggs. Be very careful" on the back, in small enough writing that wont be noticed by the mail delivery people.
    --

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  9. Re:Don't just send them empty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    - Change. (Costing more in postage than it's worth)

    I think it is terrible that you would rather spend your money to punish another than to take that pocket change and give it to a cause that would benefit from it (e.g. a local charity). I find it disturbing that you would encourage others to do the same

  10. How is it morally bankrupt? by OlympicSponsor · · Score: 2

    I would say that an eye for an eye is simply an enforced version of the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. And trusteth me, they will if you do.

    And of course the Golden Rule is also reflected in Kant's Categorical Imperitive. When deciding if something is ethical, ask yourself "what if everybody did it?"

    And another reflection: Axelrod's work on the Prisoner's Dilemma. Someone who knows the phrase "Lex Talionis" has probably heard about this, so I'll leave you with this unexplained remark: Tit for Tat won.

    Philosophers and scientists agree, an eye for an eye is OK and workable. Get into the 21st Century, man.
    --
    MailOne

    --
    Non-meta-modded "Overrated" mods are killing Slashdot
    (Hey Ryan! Here's your proof!)
    1. Re:How is it morally bankrupt? by crgrace · · Score: 2
      And of course the Golden Rule is also reflected in Kant's Categorical Imperitive. When deciding if something is ethical, ask yourself "what if everybody did it?"

      That is a truly ridiculous argument for "an- eye-for-an-eye", mate. Do you think it is ethical for you to go down to the market for a bottle of Pepsi? Well, according to the Categorical Imperitive, no, because if EVERYONE when down to the market anarchy would ensue with riots and murders leading to pitched battles as the supplies of Pepsi dwindled, and could eventually lead to the downfall of Western Civilization. Give a break.

      As for your, er, analysis of the Prisoner's dilemma, "tit for tat" maximizes only the two prisoner's COLLECTIVE expected utility. The best result for a given prisoner is to sell out the other prisoner given that the other prisoner doesn't talk. That's why it's called a dilemma, mate. Tit for Tat did NOT win, because if you believe the other prisoner is honest, you can screw him and do better for yourself than if you were honest.

      I am a scientist and I don't believe an eye for an eye is OK or workable. We live in an obstensibly civilized society, and to forgive is divine.

  11. empty? wuss... by option8 · · Score: 2

    when i feel like sending a message to Joe's Credit Card company for spamming me and the postal service with their platinum credit card offers for the umpteenth time, i carefully peel out the postage paid return envelope and then shred the rest (not with a shredder, mind you, but the old fashioned neandethal way than really gives me a sense of satisfaction when it's done) and then send them back the resulting confetti.

    35 cents out of their pockets, plus whoever unstuffs those envelopes gets a lapful of shredded paper. or, better yet, if they're done by machine, maybe my little act of revenge clogs up their cogs for a few minutes, and in the meantime, the machinery of junkmailing grinds to a halt.

    i can dream, can't i?

  12. Send Them Porn by simetra · · Score: 2

    I used to clip a good crotch shot out of a porno mag and send that back in those postage paid reply envelopes. You know someone's either going to be shocked, or happy.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  13. Re:Credit card/solicitation calls by hakioawa · · Score: 1

    I just tell them I'm glad they called. Because the bankrupcy judge forced me to cut up and cancel all my old cards.

  14. Once Again, FYI by bahtama · · Score: 2
    Once again as an FYI, here is a simple page to use to get rid of various forms of commercial harrassment. I used this form 2 years ago and only have to check my snail mailbox once a week now and it's only good stuff. I also NEVER get called anymore....

    JunkMail Removal Info

    =-=-=-=-=
    "Do you hear the Slashdotters sing,

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

  15. Re:What about junk/advert. flyers? by rawburt · · Score: 1

    I made a sign for our frontdoor saying "Rawburt's flyer storage - We take care of your storage problems. Only $10 per flyer and day" and send a bill to the supermarket once a week. Unfortunately my SO didn't appreciate it and she forced me to change the sign to "No flyers please". Amazingly that sign works.

    --
    --- oops
  16. That's not the problem though... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    They aren't relaying... Relaying is already turned off. They aren't sending it through my server in the sense that it's going to another server. They are sending it through my server in the sense that they are attacking my users.

    They are spoofing headers and sending (hundreds of) messages to valid e-mail addresses.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  17. I send Columbia Music their stickers. by Donem · · Score: 1

    The stickers fit perfect in the Business Replies.
    I may Marker on there "no thanks" or something.

  18. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by tewwetruggur · · Score: 1
    Why should we be happy when the spammers get spammed?

    Its not so much that we're happy... its more that we're amused - its funny in an ironic way.

    I fail to see how the spammer getting spammed "hurt" him. You really need to come down off your soapbox and change your perspective on the world - I've rarely read such a skewed point-of-view. Your high-and-mighty attitude only adds to this.

    Not that I'm trying to flame you, but really - it is amusing in itself how serious you seem to take everything, as I've read many of your past posts. Lighten up.

    --
    Hi! This is the Sig, blatantly attached to the end of this comment.
  19. Phone Spam by platos_beard · · Score: 1
    Since 1992, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act has required that if you tell telemarketers not to call you again, they put you on a list and not call again.

    Most companies abide by these rules, so saying "please put me on your do-not-call list" very effectively cuts down on calls, and can be done without being rude to the operators who probably don't like calling you any more than you like being called by them.

    Doesn't apply to charities, doesn't apply at work, won't bring about world peace, but it's something.

    --
    What's a sig?
    1. Re:Phone Spam by gfxguy · · Score: 1
      It can take a long time, but it eventually starts slowing down all those calls. It can pay off to actually keep the list next to your phone - they start with "hello, this is from , please put me on your don't call list."

      It really has cut down on the number of solicitations. As others have mentioned, we are set up to reject anonymous calls, and we simply don't answer out of area calls unless we are expecting a call from someone we know is out of area (my wife is from another country). If it turns out to be important, we hear the answering machine.

      When it comes to charities: I simply tell them to send me literature about how the money is spent, how much actually goes to the intended party, etc.
      ----------

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  20. Re:Junk mail subsidizes first class mail by Rader · · Score: 3
    Nice guess, but it doesn't work that way. Automated postage (1st, 2nd, and 3rd class) are given a discount. Theoretically because they don't need as much work done with them due to bar coding, automation equipment, etc. (Barcoding is done on many units: The article itself, the bundled units, mail bags, pallets). The horrid truth though, is that most of these expensive automative machines weren't even into effect until recently...even though you'd have guessed they'd been around for decades.

    Other types of mail income are used to offset these costs. 2nd class postage is a great example: a new subdivision called "Priority 2nd Class" has been given to monstrous magazines (think: U.S. News, Time, etc) To get their business, the USPS has given special treatment and costs, while those not qualifying (any magazine/newspaper under a zillion subscribers) have seen significant increase in postage. Example: 14% increase every other year. The post office has made it clear that these types of mailers are a hindrance, and a pain in the ass to the USPS. They would rather deliver sorted pallets by the truckload than break it down further.

    On a smaller scale you'll see the same with 1st class. It's harder for the USPS to do this, because every citizen is affected by increases in 1st class mail, while only publishers are affected by 2nd class increases...Fewer people can complain..and so the raping of 2nd class continues.

    Anyway, in the beginning, the USPS was in business to deliver your personal mail. As they grew, and tried to take more money, get more customers (Like all the dirty tricks they used to (and still do) against UPS) and allow bulk mail, etc, etc, they have since had to buy more facilities, more equipment, and many many many more employees. As they continue to make better bottom lines on large customers, they will continue to abhor your mail and mine. Our costs will increase. Eventually the cost will make us cut down our mailing. It already has. How many stamps can you get for $1. Ooops, not even 3 now.

    I remember back in the '80s, once a month, letter mail that used to take 1 day to get here, took 2 days instead. What was going on? Turned out that it was all related to the day the new Playboy issue came out. Playboy paid a cheap automation rate that covered the automation costs of the USPS, but it was our 1st class mail that suffered, and paid for the extra employees and leg work that was needed.

    Rader

  21. SASEs by vandelais · · Score: 1

    It won't exactly be 30 cents that the recipient is charged because it's bulk mail, but I like the sentiment. You forgot to mention the 2 or 3 pieces of construction paper that you're supposed to fold into the envelope to make the recipient pay the higher rate!

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
  22. Re:Dude, evolve some more by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    The trick is not to go overboard. Instead of affixing a brick, find some old lead wheelweights, and put one or two in the envelope. It will be more expensive, and they company will have to get rid of a toxic substance. Enough people do this, and then we can report the bastards to the EPA!.

  23. Re:Credit card/solicitation calls by squiggleslash · · Score: 2
    The procedure is tell them to add you to their "Do not call list". Be insistant. If they say "I understand you want us to take you off our list?", correct them with "No, I want you to put me on to your 'Do Not Call' list, the list of numbers you must not ever call."

    There's more information at Junkbusters.com which is very good for this kind of information. Incidentally, the fine is federally mandated (ie you and the marketer don't need to "negotiate", it's $500 per offense.) There are, I believe, lawyers who specialise in collecting the funds for a large cut, so if you're prepared to do the auditing, you can just report incidents of abuse and see the money roll in with no further intervention on your part.

    Me, I just put the phone down on them. It's usually pretty easy to detect they're calling as the first few seconds of the call are usually complete silence, followed by background noise of other telemarketers in the same complex (prison?) at work.

    The most important thing for people to realise is that these people are scum. Despite the obsession with some of the belief that if something is legal, then it is right, most people follow the basic rule that anything that directly reduces another person's quality of life for a minor gain on the part of the actor is an act of selfishness. Disturbing someone, intruding into their private time, with no regard to what they're doing or what effect it would have on them, is basically completely wrong. That's why we hate the calls.

    It is legitimate to put the phone down without saying anything. It's also legitimate to (without resorting to abuse) tell the scumbag exactly what you think of them and tie up their time so they cannot abuse someone else and so they're made fully aware of the effect they're having.

    If I were President, I'd cut their goolies off, but that's just me.
    --

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  24. Re:Helpful Checklist by QuMa · · Score: 1

    I'd hardly call 'you could do something stupid' a reason not to fill up those envelopes. And even if they don't have to pay more for a 500g reply, if enough people do it your countries postal service will up the price for those guys... I'm all for...

  25. Yes.... by quintessent · · Score: 1

    But in this modern age of technology, we are also lucky to have access to the very useful black permanent marker.

  26. Remember... by AntiPasto · · Score: 4
    To combat telemarketters, it's not illegal to harass *them* if they called *you* (er... last I heard)... so go ahead... tell them your deepest and darkest secret.

    a buddy of mine: "oh really? well let me tell *you* about the *great* anal sex I had last night" ... click.

    ----

    1. Re:Remember... by _w00d_ · · Score: 2

      I love to ask questions like these to telemarketers and refuse to tell them who they are speaking with unless they first tell me who they are. Unfortunately, they usually hang up before you can get your questions answered. That is why I wish there was some way to tell where they were calling from and who was calling. Telemarketers should be forced to use Caller ID that spans all phone companies so you never see the "Out of Area" message on your Caller ID display just because the telemarketer has another phone provider or is in another state. That's my $0.02.

    2. Re:Remember... by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 1
      "Hi, I'm calling from Sun .."
      "But I told you not to call me!"
      "Oh, sorry, must have a memory problem."

      click

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    3. Re:Remember... by Monte · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it really strikes a blow against telemarketing to take it out on the poor guy making minimum wage whose circumstances have made him desperate enough to take one of the worst jobs in the universe.

      Absolute rubbish! By unloading on these weasle bastards I may, just may get one of them to think "Hey - I'm better than this. I'm a worthwhile person, and it's demeaning and horrible for me to hold a job that is, in essence, a tremendous annoyance to hardworking honest people. I'm going to CHANGE! I'm going to get some education, read some books, learn how to sling HTML and get a REAL JOB!"

      So every time I call a telemarketer a choad-smoking bag of of fermented piss who should take their headset and ram it up their chocolate starfish, I am, in my own small way, helping that person.

    4. Re:Remember... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      Is anyone aware of what the CRTC (or correct Canadian Government Body) requires from TeleMarketers in Canada? In the vein above - what are they required to tell you, do for you etc etc.

    5. Re:Remember... by Snowfox · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it really strikes a blow against telemarketing to take it out on the poor guy making minimum wage whose circumstances have made him desperate enough to take one of the worst jobs in the universe.

      Convince me that there are NO other choices for this person and maybe I'll listen to you play the violin a while.

      If you take a job telemarketing, you KNOW that you're doing something to inconvenience them. There is ZERO sympathy deserved by these people, regardless of how little they earn.

      I usually leave telemarketers off with something along the lines of, "Hey, buddy - is this really what you wanted to do when you grew up? Put me on your no-call list."

      To digress - word to the wise: the wording you should use is "put me on your don't call list," not "take me off your call list." Telemarketers are required to keep a list of numbers not to call. Taking you OFF the list just means that you're not getting called again this cycle... which they wouldn't have done anyway.

    6. Re:Remember... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Really? They can't pick up a shovel? Flip burgers? Sit at the "Take a Number" desk at the DMV and refuse to open their mouths no matter what? There are a lot of jobs out there, and although not glamourous, are certainly better than being a telemarketer.

      There's a reason telemarketers are trained NOT to give out their last name.

      --

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    7. Re:Remember... by Kotetsu · · Score: 1

      I managed about 45 minutes once, too. This guy was trying to sell me one of those coupon books with discounts. I got him to read me all the coupons in the book. The only one I remember anymore was one for "buy a hang glider, get a second hang glider for a penny".

      --

      "Bite me, it's fun!" - Crowe T. Robot
    8. Re:Remember... by Pembroke · · Score: 1

      And of course in all reality, if the only marketable skill you have is telemarketing, it wouldn't be that much of a tragedy if you jumped off a building because I harrassed you anyway. The one's I have trouble with are the people who are collecting for a decent cause, because they're annoying, but you can't hate them.

    9. Re:Remember... by rw2 · · Score: 2
      I would think they would appreciate the break, not having to talk.


      And that's all good with me. I haven't a significant beef with the employees. I've had shitty jobs from time to time when hungry enough so I appreciate their position.

      Just so long as I get to slow them down.

      --

    10. Re:Remember... by skink1100 · · Score: 1

      Here's a much simpler (and more costly) retaliation I use against telemarketers: when they ask for me I say, "Certainly, he's here, one moment", put them on hold, and leave the phone alone for awhile. They will wait awhile, and every minute they wait is a minute wasted, both their time and long distance charges.

    11. Re:Remember... by bluephone · · Score: 1

      No no no, the line is: Think of it as evolution in action. Get your Niven quotes right.

      --

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    12. Re:Remember... by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      I let them get about half-way through, then suddenly propose to them (male or female, though the males take it with considerably less poise). If this isn't enough, I wax poetic about their voice, etc etc.. I've never had the same company call me twice (Except for the longdistance companies, who never give up short of death threats).

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    13. Re:Remember... by donutello · · Score: 2

      Don't forget who the real scum of the earth is. It's those damn meter maids. Next time I see one I'm going to tell him about my anal sex experience...

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    14. Re:Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

      Telemarketer: "Hello Mr. X, let me tell you about this great offer..."
      Me: "May I ask your name?"

      Telemarketer: "Joe...I have a great dea..."
      Me: "May I ask your last name Joe?"

      Telemarketer: "I don't see why you'd need that."
      Me: "May I remind you that under FCC regulation you are required to state your first and last name upon request?"

      Telemarketer: "..I didn't know that...Joe Doe."
      Me: "Then I guess I can inform you that it is your employer's responsibility to inform you of FCC regulations, and that if you're going to making these calls, the FCC requires you to know these regulations. If your employer does not inform you of the regulations, they are committing a felony. May I ask your employers name?"

      Telemarketer: "Wow... I didn't know that. I work for Credit Card Company X."
      Me: "Joe, I asked YOUR employer. You work for a telemarketing firm, not a credit card company."

      Telemarketer: "I'm not allowed to tell you that.
      Me: "Then I may remind you that under FCC regulation that you MUST state your employer's name as well as your immediate supervisor's name upon request."

      Me: "Furthermore, if I request to be added to your 'Do not call' list, you MUST add me to the list. If your employer is not keeping a list, they are subject to fines up to $500,000, and I am entitled to a $500 voucher."

      Telemarketer: "Sir, I just called to ask..."
      Me: "You never stated your employers name. Please don't commit a felony, Joe."

      Telemarketer: "Phone Services X."
      Me: "Please add me to your do not call list. If I get a call from Phone Services X within the next 5 years, I will hold you, Joe Doe, and your employer, Phone Services X, responsible. I will contact the FCC and you will be prosecuted."

      *click*

    15. Re:Remember... by Tuzanor · · Score: 1

      It's not 100% the same but there are very similar laws in canada

    16. Re:Remember... by wass · · Score: 3
      Or use the method my friend told me about, it's amusing.

      telemarketer : Let me tell you about our new deal which allows you to pay multiple credit card bills on one monthly bill, while we take a 50% cut.
      You : Wow, that sounds like a GREAT deal. I can't believe it. Honey, come here and listen to this.
      telemarketer : Yes, all we have to do now is get all your credit card information, including card number and expiration date.
      You : This is a great deal, tell me how to sign up. I can't wait to reap the rewards!

      Keep it up, and just like politicians, just avert all questions leading for information with remarks of how great a deal it is. Eventually either the telemarketer gets frustated and hangs up, or you get bored. Sometimes the telemarketers even laugh and voluntarily let you go.

      Or you can just follow the information at the JunkBuster's telemarketing-reduction page .

      --

      make world, not war

    17. Re:Remember... by loosenut · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, when I was in college, a telemarketer called me and rambled on about what a great deal I could get blah blah blah... After listening for a minute, and noticing his subtle lisp, I (a male) interrupted him:

      "You have a really sexy voice."

      "R-r-really? Uh..."

      "Say something sexy to me"

      (whispering) "I caaaaan't. My manager will hear me!"

      "Oh, okay, well, have a nice day". [click]

      disclaimer: please don't take the above as an indication of any tendancy to commit hate crimes of any sort.

    18. Re:Remember... by Steve+G+Swine · · Score: 1

      "Hi, I'm calling from (insert name of long-distance pusher here)..."

      "But... I don't have a phone."

      "Then how are we talking?"

      "I Have No Idea."

      (this one's a personal favorite of mine...)

      --
      "Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr. Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer." - Linux Advocac
    19. Re:Remember... by Wiseleo · · Score: 2

      Ooh I have fun with those people.

      For example, yesterday a tele-girl called me asking to speak to an adult woman. My reply:

      I used to be a woman, but now I am a man. I used to have a woman, but she's with another man. I would like for you to be my new woman. - shocked silence, quick "I'm sorry to bother you, bye".

      Another one tried to sell me discount coupon book to my local mall. I calmly started inquiring about whether she's informed if there are any BDSM items I can purchase and at what cost. Poor thing was on the phone with me learning the intricacies of my questions for over half an hour and hung up in tears.
      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
    20. Re:Remember... by MadAhab · · Score: 1

      Or, if you really like wasting their time, just put the phone down while they go through their whole spiel and leave it there until they hang up.

      Boss of nothin. Big deal.
      Son, go get daddy's hard plastic eyes.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    21. Re:Remember... by squiggleslash · · Score: 2
      But the intention is to make it the worst job in the universe. It isn't the worst job in the universe unless people abuse them.

      I don't want people to apply for telemarketing positions. There are almost always other jobs out there. If someone's faced with the choice between MacDonalds and telemarketing, let them chose the golden arches.

      MacDonalds, at least, is a positive thing. You're feeding people and making their lives easier. Telemarketers are disturbing people and forcing their garbage on others.
      --

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    22. Re:Remember... by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      minimum wage? i've never heard of a telemarketer earning that little. sure, you have to keep up your sales to keep your $10 an hour earnings, but i was pretty sure they don't earn only min. wage...


      "Leave the gun, take the canoli."

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    23. Re:Remember... by kc7cfk · · Score: 1

      My usual stratgey is to just set the phone down and walk away during their initial pitch. I go hang it up when I hear the off-hook alarm ringing. This runs up their phone bill and, hopefully, makes the caller feel stupid.

    24. Re:Remember... by ilsa · · Score: 2

      My dad likes to play with telemarketers. He figures the longer he keeps them on the phone, the longer they are not bothering someone else (like a little old lady who doesn't realize her brick house doesn't need aluminum siding). The aluminum siding guys are his favorite, BTW. He lets them go through the whole script and then they ask for a sales appointment. He says "That would be great! I'm at 123 Street Road, Apartment number...."
      This is when they usually hang up.

      --
      -- I Am Not A Terrorist.
    25. Re:Remember... by Alan · · Score: 2

      Not bad :) How did you do it?

    26. Re:Remember... by dmorin · · Score: 1

      You know I once knew a girl who was dating a telemarketer guy. When I told him "Oh, I don't like to hang up on people, that's rude. I very patiently wait until the guy takes a breath and asks me a question, and then I say no thank you." Guy then gets pissed and says "I hate you people! That's such a waste of my time!" I was like, sorry guy, you call me during dinner, you're on my clock now.

    27. Re:Remember... by sulli · · Score: 1

      Do keep in mind that your meter maid may too be a fan of anal sex! You just might meet a new friend that way.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    28. Re:Remember... by inburito · · Score: 2

      How did the law go about having a recording played in the start of the call? I had a telemarketing call recently that started with a 25sec recording. I hanged up and 5 seconds later that recording was still playing. This was essentially keeping my phone unavailable for something more important. I recall reading about a law concerning this..

    29. Re:Remember... by dghxc+fhgxd · · Score: 1

      actually, while i was in college, i had many friends who were Telemarketers. THey got paid rather well (for a job that requires little or no skill) somthing along the lines of $12 to $16 an hour. It really depended on how many sales they made. Since strting pay was aroung $10/hr, i wouldnt think it was all that bad... except for Telemarketers are STILL spawn of the dark god Shabringo.

      --
      Hash Bang Slash Bin Slash Bash ..... Hack 'n Slash :p
    30. Re:Remember... by willfe · · Score: 1

      Doing this is so satisfying. I've done it, a couple of times. There's a problem with this, though -- The bastards usually hang up! Since caller ID is useless ("OUT OF AREA/OUT OF AREA", always), how does one actually track these buggers down and pursue the $500 remedy they're supposed to pay? It's so frustrating to have Junkbuster's telemarketing script lined up and ready to go only to have the jerks hang up on you the instant you start asking nosy questions (a bit rude, ain't it? :)

      --
      Read my stuff.
    31. Re:Remember... by WinDoze · · Score: 2

      Telemarketers are the BEST!

      "Hi, I'm calling from (insert name of newspaper here)..."
      "But... I can't read."

      "Hi, I'm calling from (inser name of church here)..."
      "But... I worship Satan"

      "Hi, I'm calling from Microsoft..."
      "(click!)"

    32. Re:Remember... by rark · · Score: 1

      I dunno. If you work for McDonalds you work for a company that causes major environmental damage and is implecated in the slaughter of billions of cattle, not to mention heart disease, etc

      And telemarketing pays more.

      I figure the best option is just to tell them that they need to remove me from their list and that I never buy anything over the phone. That way I get bothered less and I don't waste any of their time.

      That's just me, though.

    33. Re:Remember... by CyberQuog · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about a computer program that when a telemarketer calls, you start up the program and it gives u prompts to tell the telemarketer, then it saves the information to the file, and if the same company ever calls you again it will tell you, and you can press charges. I find this utterly hillarious. Can anyone tell me the name of the program or one like it?

      --
      - *Normality Is The Root of All Evil*
    34. Re:Remember... by casret · · Score: 2

      The applicable parts of the TCPA are outlined here.

      IANAL but it seems like a2 would make it illegal.
      Junkbusters has good information about telemarketers and protecting yourself.

    35. Re:Remember... by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 5

      Yeah, it really strikes a blow against telemarketing to take it out on the poor guy making minimum wage whose circumstances have made him desperate enough to take one of the worst jobs in the universe.

      The same can't be said for spammers, though, since they typically are self-employed jerks...

    36. Re:Remember... by Darby · · Score: 1

      And all this time I just hung up on them.
      I can't wait to try this one BWAHAHAHA!
      Thanks for the hot tip.


      ---CONFLICT!!---

    37. Re:Remember... by homebru · · Score: 1

      Good reason (besides the training) that they won't identify. Many boiler rooms are now being operated out of minimum-security prisons.

      It's like, they've got nothing else to do and, in many cases, scamming strangers is the only skill they ever had.

    38. Re:Remember... by sjames · · Score: 2

      say something witty or obscene THEN hang up on them. It actually does make the night more amusing.

      My personal favorite is to make them think I hung up on them. Many just hang up, but some swear up a storm. The fun begins when I ask them to repeat that. I'm not sure what it sounds like when someone swallows his tongue, but I think I've heard something similar at least.

    39. Re:Remember... by Tri0de · · Score: 1

      I try to see how loud I can get them to talk: "I'm sorry, I can't hear you...Speak up please...what was that..."I can usually get them fairly SCREAMING. Then cooly say "there's no need to yell"

      --
      "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
    40. Re:Remember... by dattaway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it really strikes a blow against telemarketing to take it out on the poor guy making minimum wage...

      Consider it evolution in action.

    41. Re:Remember... by jfunk · · Score: 3

      Check this out.

      They show the current rules there and explain how they are trying to get complete coverage of these rules. There's also a link to the document, but this press release sums it up quitenicely.

      I found it interesting that they prefer HTML for electronic comments...

    42. Re:Remember... by G-Man · · Score: 2

      Well, he might be a prison inmate, in which case he may just enjoy talking to someone new. Of course, he could probably also one-up you in the "dark secret" category...

    43. Re:Remember... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      "Shababingo?"

      "THAT'S SHABRANIGDO!"

      (I'm sure I screwed up both the quote AND the spelling, but I'm sure you get the point ;) )

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    44. Re:Remember... by johnathan · · Score: 1
      You've obviously never washed dishes for a living.
      Of course, nothing beats assistant crack whore for worst job in the universe.

      --

      --
      You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
    45. Re:Remember... by M.+Silver · · Score: 1
      If someone's faced with the choice between MacDonalds and telemarketing, let them chose the golden arches.

      Telemarketing pays better than McDonald's. Telemarketing is generally evening work, which means wife can work when husband comes home to watch the kids. Telemarketing is frequently done by people who can't be on their feet all day. Many telemarketing companies provide on-site daycare.

      My home town, sadly, is one of the big telemarketing capitals of the US. It's not pleasant work, but for the people working there, it really is better than the alternatives.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    46. Re:Remember... by grappler · · Score: 2

      yeah - I tell them to please hold. I then put them on hold and check back every so often to see how long it takes for the light to turn off. Some telemarketers will wait for several minutes.

      It's a nice way of wasting a minimum of my time and a maximum of theirs.

      --
      Vidi, Vici, Veni
    47. Re:Remember... by Zaph · · Score: 3

      I don't see it that way.

      That "poor guy" made the decision to take a job as un-ethical as telemarketing. He knows going into the job he will get abuse, and personally, I think he deserves it.

      I consider telemarketing to be the worst kind of spam... at least with postal spam or email spam I can easily dismiss it, and it ususally doesn't interrupt what I'm doing at the moment.

      --
      Quoth the Penguin, "pipe grep more!"
    48. Re:Remember... by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      Hahaha! Unfortunately, I bet a lot of people who believe in evolution would also say that this doesn't help the human race because it's cruel and insensitive, and *gasp* discriminatory towards poor people. I say: "Sorry fool, you're the one that invented the evolutionary theory in the first place!"

    49. Re:Remember... by mindriot · · Score: 1

      Well Harassment is not the only interesting thing... wasting their (and their company's) time is pretty much interesting too, and that also works with salespeople coming to your door etc. Just look interested and discuss their wonderful product with them for maybe 15 or 20 minutes until you finally say you weren't going to buy anything anyway.

    50. Re:Remember... by The+G · · Score: 4

      And if the poor guy were getting minimum wage for killing people, would you say that we should feel sorry for him?

      Sorry, there's no ethical "get out of jail free" card for the poor. Just because someone is willing to pay for a service doesn't make it right.
      --G

    51. Re:Remember... by rw2 · · Score: 2
      Around my house we have a contest to see who can keep the telemarketer on the phone the longest. Many have rules stating that they cannot hang up the phone without a sale, the customer must hang up on them.

      They usually break that rule after 5-10 minutes, but it's pretty funny anyway.

      It's usually pretty easy to string them along that long too. Just ask them to hang on a sec and go back to your program. Every so often check in to make sure they are still there.

      I've had them play songs on the touch tones, listened to them talk with their bosses for instruction on what to do (referring to me as 'crazy') and generally moan as they sit there talking to no one.

      It is the tiniest bit of work, but between the entertainment value and the knowledge that I'm keeping them from interrupting 30 other peoples dinner we quite enjoy ourselves.

      --

    52. Re:Remember... by gimpboy · · Score: 1

      i prefer to talk to them for a while. example:

      tm: hi i'm offering you unemployment insurance
      me: thats great the cops busted me 2 days ago and took all of my weed. now i can get more weed and use that money to pay the lawyer bills.


      use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that

      --
      -- john
    53. Re:Remember... by IngramJames · · Score: 1

      Another one tried to sell me discount coupon book to my local mall. I calmly started inquiring about whether she's informed if there are any BDSM items I can purchase

      So were there any BDSM items at the mall or not? How much?
      ---------------------------

      --
      'No rational religion claims "supernatural" exists, that's an atheist slander.' - seen on slashdot.
    54. Re:Remember... by shippo · · Score: 2
      "Hello, I'm calling from (insert name of double-glazing company)......"

      "But my house already has windows!"

    55. Re:Remember... by gimpboy · · Score: 1

      well she was trying to give me something for free that i would have to pay for eventually. i told her that i wanted to buy something now. i asked her what she had in her pockets, purse, etc. she said she had a compact, so i told her to send it to me and bill my credit card (she was calling on thier behalf). i told her that i would pay her $100 for it, but she must bill me now and send it quickly.

      well soon she asked if i was on drugs, and i told her that i dont do drugs i sell them. she told me that drugs were bad, and i told her that she shouldn't judge something she hasnt tried. then i told her that i was a crack dealer, and that i would send her some for free...

      it went on like this for quite a while. i always try to get their email addresses, althought i have yet to be successful at this.

      it's kinda weird, but some of these people will actually call me back to talk later.

      use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that

      --
      -- john
    56. Re:Remember... by gimpboy · · Score: 1

      my record is 45 min.

      use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that

      --
      -- john
    57. Re:Remember... by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 1

      They set it up so that you can't talk to the decision maker, so the only choice is to make it difficult for them to do business. Piss off their employees so much that they quit quickly and there is such massive turnover they have to spend a lot more money to get and keep employees.

      It doesn't work quickly, but if enough people did this it would in the long run.

    58. Re:Remember... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1

      Or just waste their time:
      -Sorry, there's somebody at the door, I'll be back in a minute.
      Then, half an hour later, come back and check whether he is still on line...

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    59. Re:Remember... by sulli · · Score: 1

      Dude, labor shortage... there are lots of jobs out there that don't involve harassing people at work.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  27. Re:Mail their own spam back to 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    BE CAREFULL!
    Not all email programs regard localhost as 127.0.0.1. Some (read: M$) may add .com after the host name, in the name of helping out the user. As Localhost.com can tell you, they get tons of mail delivered to them because someone puts 'localhost' as an email address.

  28. Re:Expansion on CmdrTaco's idea by crackhed · · Score: 1

    Personally I like to do two things: 1. Stamp the outside of the envelope with "See Mental Health Records" (An idea I stole from Markoff Chaney as my small contribution to Operation MindFuck) and then 2. glue the envelope to a brick or large rock. I then drop it in a public mailbox so as not to piss off my mailman (don't want to take the chance that he'll go postal). I've been doing this for several years now. I don't know if they actually get there, but it is a good way to kill a few minutes.

    --
    Illusion is the only reality. - Gustav Flaubert
  29. Re:Junk Mail Revenge by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 1
    You can put as much heavy material as possible into the envelope

    I suggest using depleted uranium.

  30. Re:Don't just send them empty! by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Optus FACSys for NT. Don't touch them with any length of pole. They are fuckwads of the highest degree. Their product is absolutely unsupported, they refuse to answer any question directly and refuse to answer questions asked by their authorised resellers. Their driver crash every few weeks, their server spits out error codes that can't be found in docs, or in their tech notes. Their "Exchange Connector" refuses to pass NDRs, and loses faxes every so often. FACSys is a piece of shit. DO NOT BUY IT.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  31. Bounce-Mail: Return Post-paid Junkmail - Blank by beefjerky_com · · Score: 1

    I'm glad you like your new hobby, Cmd. Taco. Out of your appreciation of me posting the idea here, the least you could do is buy some excellent beef jerky form my site listed below. Have fun!

    To the Moon!
    http://www.beefjerky.com
    Home of Final Frontier Jerky

  32. Re:Postage-paid by WillSeattle · · Score: 2

    However, I would feel sorry for the poor postal employees that now have to send junk mail *both* ways.

    Remember that the USPS makes a profit on delivering that postage-paid card. You're helping employ that postal employee ...

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  33. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by jejones · · Score: 1

    I'll agree that lex talionis is not the best moral code (though OTOH, it may well have been an advance in its time--back then it probably lowered the amount of retaliation!)...but what in your "pity the poor spammer, trying to feed his hungry children..." argument wouldn't apply to any crime, however heinous? Sorry, but the perpetrator deserves punishment of some kind--actually, better still would be restitution. How about this: require spammers to pay for selected people or organizations' net access for a length of time determined by the bandwidth they screwed people out of.

  34. Re:Dude, evolve some more by thogard · · Score: 1

    Most prepaid stuff won't get delivered if its not standard size. It just gets dropped in the local garbage dump after being checked for letter bombs and the like. If you want to send stuff, it has to look and feel like a standard reply.

  35. I disagree that Lex Talionis is... by kspencer · · Score: 2

    So what you're saying is that it is more humane to lock people away from 'normal' people, congregating them amongst a brutish populace administered by people who must for their own protection assume the worst of those they supervise, for an arbitrary amount of time determined by how much money they had and how well-spoken their attorney was and perhaps how politically distasteful their crime was.

    No, I'm sorry. What you're saying is that we should realize that the perpetrator of the crime is a victim who must be treated and trained and assisted, who must be understood when they backslide and recommit the crime because of course the treatment is still in process, that we should not use punishment because it is damaging to the psyche - and of course the victims of the crime (other than the criminal victim) will have to recover as best they can without the cathartic closure of punishment but will have to gain strength from the knowledge that their pain was the first step to the recovery of another human being.

    As opposed to a swift, certain, relevant punishment which provides the catharsis and the preventive measure, which can then be followed with treatments for both committer and victim of the crime.

    What kind of giddy moral superiority do you get from assuming I like to see people hurt?

  36. Re:Empty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Empty is no good. People don't open the envelopes, machines do. They pull out the contents and stack them neatly and then someone picks up the stack and deleiers it to some poor sap who has to enter all the information.

    Be sure to put something in the envelope. Confetti or paper chips are good, they can jam up the machine. Crumpled paper won't stack neatly in their machines. Small metal strips will jam the envelope slitting machine but since most machines slit the top and since the envelopes can be inserted either face up or face down, you have to tape a metal strip inside the envelope at both the top and bottom to be successful. Use brass or aluminum, they check for magnetic metal and reject those envelopes. You can also tape a bunch of papers to the envelope, it makes it so the machine can't separate the papers from the envelope.

    (Info from a friend who used to work at one of these places.)

  37. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by grappler · · Score: 2

    but perhaps that _is_ a solution. If this makes a spammer decide to find another line of work, the world is suddenly just a little more beautiful.

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  38. Re:spam fighting by scotch · · Score: 1
    How much spam a week do you get?

    I guess 100 a week is average.

    Do you want to play games with spammers or do you want to get their accounts removed?

    Both, depends on my mood. So sue me.

    --
    XML causes global warming.
  39. Old joke... by sava · · Score: 1

    I've practised returning the pre-paid envelopes full of crap, mud and stuff over ten years now. Here in Finland (maybe everywhere in EU area?) that's not even a cheap joke but costs some 3-4 times more to the receiver than posting the envelope just with a stamp (as far as I know). Something called fun =)

    --
    //SaVa
  40. Re:postage guaranteed vs. BRM postcards by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    Also, anything you return using a BRM envelope must fit in the envelope. Otherwise, the postal service will return them.

    lead is cheap and it has a low boiling point. it can eaisly be molded into a volume that will fit into an evelope.

    use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that

    --
    -- john
  41. Photo of someones arse by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2

    With "Kiss this" written on the back.
    When I was at uni in England the T.V. Licensing Board kept sending me nasty letters telling me to buy a T.V. License, despite the fact we already had one for the address. Eventually we got such a photo (which a friend had kindly left on a housemates camera that was laying around during a house party) and sent it to them in their reply paid envelope.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  42. Fighting Back: At War With Telemarketers by IRNI · · Score: 2

    Here is soemthing my friend wrote recently on the subject of telemarketers and how to get back at them.

    Click here to read it.
    IRNI

  43. nocall list by bpowell423 · · Score: 1

    I just discovered recently that Tennessee (and a lot of other states, btw) has a telemarketer-do-not-call list. I'm moving to a different county, so I've decided to put my new phone number on the do-not-call list. Now I'm just dying for a telemarketer to call me. It's an automatic $2000 fine. I don't think I get any of that, though. So hopefully I'll have fewer telemarker calls. And if not, some telemarketers will be helping to keep my taxes low! I'll kind of miss getting to be rude to them, though... Once I was eating dinner when I got a call from a telemarketer. After she started into her speech, I just set the phone down on the table. About five minutes later I picked it up and she was saying "hello...? hello...?" Then there was the time I was working on my car when my wife called me to the phone. I was pretty sure it was a telemarketer, so I answered, "Hi, this is Robert, if you're selling, I'm not buying. What can I do for you today?" The telemarketer didn't say a single word, just hung up! I'll miss that...

  44. Spam does suck by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
    I once argued a telemarketer into the ground about how her trying to send me a 'free 30-day trial' packet of info was actually wasting my time and costing me money in the time I would later have to waste in calling them back to tell them I didn't want their offer. After about 10 minutes she got rather confused and annoyed, and ended the call as if I had just called her to telemarket her. I don't think she had much of a good day after my conversation with her. It was fun!

    And my advice to people working in telemarketing is this: At least go get a job at the local McDonald's. People do not instantly despise you, and are actually sometimes happy with you for getting food in their mouths. You will probably get paid more too!

    1. Re:Spam does suck by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      Also, my uncle kept some telemarketer on the phone for over an hour! Boy did that guy feel sheepish when my uncle explained to him just how much money in commissions he had just lost!

    2. Re:Spam does suck by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Just start in asking them "are you making all the money you'd like to make?". This usually gets a confused pause, "uh, no, but.."

      Continue on with "let me tell you about a great business opportunity. Ever heard of Amway?"....

      (And if you're actually in Amway, who knows, you might pick up another distributer.)

      --
      -- Alastair
  45. Re:Mail their own spam back to 'em by HerrNewton · · Score: 1

    Better---send it to root at another, known spammer's site. Like people that make bulkmailers. It's kinda' like the strategy for knocking out Iraqi air defenses---don't hit the individual launch sites. Hit the controlling radar.

    ----

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  46. Re:First Step by sporktoast · · Score: 1

    stuff other junk mail into the envelope
    Just make sure you remove any personally identifying information. Tear your name/address off the top of any credit card applications or service request forms. The sprites at the receiving end may decide that your creativity deserves some creativity in return, and treat it as a completed application. Then you can say hello to MORE junk mail, and headaches involved in cancelling services.

    Instead of trying to make it too heavy, try to make it too thick. Fold the stuff up a bunch before you put it in the envelope. You probably need to anyways, because reply-return envelopes are often smaller than the accompanying documentation. Get everything in there, including the envelope they sent it to you in. If you can make it puffy like a pillow you'll almost guarantee that it will take special handling and cost the recipient more postage. It's easier than trying to find scrap iron to fit in the envelope.

    --
    In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
  47. Expansion on CmdrTaco's idea by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    What also amuses me is my new hobby: I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers. Empty. Eat that! 30 cents out of your pocket! Yeah!

    Here's a way to make that method even better: instead of sending back the envelopes empty (which I assume you are doing), stuff them. Preferably, stuff them with some heavy objects. That way, it'll cost more than 30 cents to get them sent back.

    ---
    Check in...OK! Check out...OK!

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  48. Re:Stupid and persistent by thogard · · Score: 2

    Maybe this could turn out to be a good idea. Give the spamers the run around by poluting all the search engines with fake bulk mailer compaines. If the people doing this all link to each other then they get higher rankings at the search engines.

  49. Not Empty! by twivel · · Score: 1

    Don't send them back empty, put something cool in it. I get enough junkmail that it's fun to show them the better offers their competitors are providing. Or maybe throw in a wrapper of what I had for dinner tonight. Or just send them the pile of extra junk back, you know those "don't open this unless you have decided to not accept this offer" pamplhets and such.
    --
    Twivel

    1. Re:Not Empty! by flickflack · · Score: 1

      whatever is supposed to be sent back, tear it into tiny pieces and then send it back.

      --
      i like fidel castro and i like his beard
  50. Empty? by nick_danger · · Score: 1
    I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers. Empty. Eat that! 30 cents out of your pocket! Yeah!

    Empty? You send them empty?! Go to WalleyWorld or any other large chain store with a sporting goods section that caters to the pickup-truck-with-a-gun-rack-in-the-back crowd, and get a couple of pounds of 1oz lead weights. Drop one or two in the envelope and THEN send it back. 30 cents? Hah! Now we're talking real money!

    Or do what a friend of mine has been known to do: tape it to a brick and send that (only he included his name with a polite request to not receive future mailings -- and you know what? It worked!)

  51. Re:Junk Mail Revenge by Monte · · Score: 1

    Even more fun: Tape the envelope or reply card to a brick before you mail it.

    How about you just enclose a single sheet of blank paper, folded, with a little bit of flour or cornstarch in it. When the pour schmuck opens it they're going to get some sort of "powder" on them, and just think what might go through their minds then...?

    "Naw. It's not anthrax. I'm sure of it... gotta keep calm..."

  52. Re:Dude, evolve some more by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    Apparently some (all?) postmasters will refuse to deliver these

    In Canada I understand this to be untrue - ANYTHING with an address and put in a PostOffice Box MUST be delivered - no matter what it is. Im almost certain its federal law. This is why you can send mail without a stamp - it still gets delivered.

    Oh - and I do the same thing with them, ive mailed shoeboxes filled with dirt :)

  53. Re:Opt Out from Credit Card Mailings by er0ck · · Score: 1

    No, When I called, I had 3 options:

    1. Opt out for 2 years
    2. Opt Back in (Ha!)
    3. Opt out PERMANANTLY

    Maybe it's a recently added option, or perhaps you didn't wait to hear all of the options.

    Best of luck!

  54. The best mailing list there is for junk mail by goingware · · Score: 2
    ... of the paper, postal variety, is the Direct Marketing Association's Direct Mail Preference Service.

    Yes, this is the list you can submit your name and address to indicate that you don't want to receive unsolicited commercial postal mail. And to some extent it will cut down on certain types of regular junk mail.

    But my old boss at Working Software, Dave Johnson, who wrote the chapter on direct mail in The High-Tech Marketing Companion, says that the Mail Preference Service has the very highest response rate of all - for certain kinds of product offers.

    (For a long period of time Working Software made most of its sales through direct mail, and Dave became quite an expert on direct mail. This was after he nearly went bankrupt listening to "channel people".)

    What kind of product offers sell through this list?

    Studded dog collars, burglar alarms, personal security devices, gun magazines and in general products that are aimed at people who are concerned with personal security and just want to be left alone.

    Being on the DMA opt-out list doesn't actually prevent you from receiving mail. Instead, members who care to bother (usually because they don't want to waste money sending mail to people who won't respond) get the list periodically and use it to prune their in-house lists. So for lists whose owners bother to go to the trouble, you will be taken off some lists.

    But studded dog-collar vendors just take the list and print up mailing labels!


    Michael D. Crawford
    GoingWare Inc

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  55. Junk Mail by The+NT+Christ · · Score: 1

    Sending the envelopes back empty is for wusses. You should take everything they sent you (which generally weighs more than the prepaid envelope allows), stuff it all in, add a couple of sheets of neutron-star material, and post *that* back. The excess postage for prepaid envelopes is monstrous.

    --

    I didn't pay for my operating system either

  56. Re:Junk mail subsidizes first class mail by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 1
    And what the fsck is up with the additional postage required for *square* envelopes? They confuse the machines, so actual *humans* must touch the mail! Oh no, better charge more.

    James

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  57. Re:please bring back sword fighting! by jfk3 · · Score: 1

    I agree. I've been saying this for a while now - usually after a chellenging commute.

  58. Re:Don't just send them empty! by sulli · · Score: 1

    Just wait until I get another of those junk mailers with a penny taped inside ... I'll send 'em lots more! Great idea.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  59. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by quintessent · · Score: 1

    spam==one person sending questionable mail to many people.

    feedback==one person sending a message to another person, in reply.

  60. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by Alioth · · Score: 2
    Sure, lex talonis may be morally bankrupt, but in this instance, nobody was doling out a punishment. The spammers (or rather, those who are tolerant of spam) were simply hoist by their own petard.

    The irony is simply amusing, that's all.

  61. Golden rule is morally bankrupt by kel-tor · · Score: 1
    Ignoring the 'American Golden Rule: the one with the gold makes the rules'... The Golden Rule itself is just as outmoded, shortsighted, etc as an 'eye for an eye.' "Treating other's as you wish to be treated," stomps all over the concept of diversity. The Golden Rule basically says that I should treat others as if they have my values. (i say that's bunk). A much better rule is, "treat other's with respect." And the best rule of all is, "don't get caught.

    --a picture had better be worth a 1000 words, it takes longer to download

    --

    ---

    1. Re:Golden rule is morally bankrupt by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      One of my values is that everyone has the right to rape everyone else on sight. I hereby rape you. I don't believe that rape is a crime, so I cannot be prosecuted. Bye now. Enjoy that dull pain in your anus for the next few days.

      But seriously... The whole point of a society is that the people in it have found that they have sufficient values in common to get along. Those values then form the basis of laws in the society. If the whole society believes that rape is a crime, then it is a crime to anyone within that society. Anyone who does not believe that rape is a crime has the option to leave the society, at which point he cannot be punished (ignoring of course any unpunished rapes he committed). Punishment of crime is the eye-for-an-eye of society as a whole against the criminal.

    2. Re:Golden rule is morally bankrupt by clary · · Score: 1
      Ignoring the 'American Golden Rule: the one with the gold makes the rules'... The Golden Rule itself is just as outmoded, shortsighted, etc as an 'eye for an eye.' "Treating other's as you wish to be treated," stomps all over the concept of diversity. The Golden Rule basically says that I should treat others as if they have my values. (i say that's bunk). A much better rule is, "treat other's with respect." And the best rule of all is, "don't get caught.
      You are missing the subtlety of the Golden Rule. How do you wish to be treated? You want others to figure out what you like, and then do it. Everyone wants this in one form or another. From your message, you want to be treated with respect. I hope I am doing that now. If you want to follow the Golden Rule, then you need to figure out how the other guy wants to be treated too.

      As an aside, diversity is overrated. Some values are better than others.

      --

      "Rub her feet." -- L.L.

  62. Resending back pre-paid postage by Hasues · · Score: 1

    Taco,

    To do it right, put washers and other scraps in the envelope. That way they have to pay even MORE postage due to the weight being too much for a common stamp to cover.

    Has

    --
    futang futang!
  63. Re:If only everyone were like me.... by simstick · · Score: 1

    I did this today for the first time. Much more satisfying thatn getting mad.

    --
    The best way to ruin your hobby is to try to make a living at it. Waiting on the paperless office since 1997
  64. Re:Fun things to do with spammers. by muleboy · · Score: 1

    > I just wish there was a spam filter that you can
    > use that would return unknown user like an
    > account died, so the spam programs would
    > automatically remove the user.

    There is: Spam Bouncer
    It is a procmail filter and it works VERY well.

  65. telemarketer fun and whatnot by toolfann · · Score: 1

    i was at a buddies house one night and the phon rang, here's what i heard...

    ...mmm hhhmmm.....mmhh...mmmm hmmm....no we got goats...yeah we got goats and they eat the carpet so e don't need them cleaned....

    along the same lines this freinds number used to belong to Stacey and Charles, people called all the time for them. we eventually just start playing off like we were them to people. once the phone rang freind answers: "charles? yeah hang on.."

    hands the phone over too me. "this is chuck!"

    some dude"chuck???...uuhh...i just wanted to thank you for getting me that money..."

    me"oh yeah about that....i'm gonna need some of that back...."

    dude:"wha-huh?"

    me:"yeah, i'm on my way out actually i just stop by ok? later."

    i wish i could have seen his face.

    --
    "learn to swim" - TOOL
  66. If you *really* want to get at telemarketeers. by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 1
    I check my caller ID and telemarketers usually have a blocked number. So, I pick up the phone and just go, "Hello?....helloooooo?...hello?" in a tone that says I'm obviously lying to them whilst the telemarketer babbles on. Then I keep on going "Hello?...Is anybody there?" until the telemarketer starts going into a tizzy and decides to hang up.

    The telemarketer will, of course, call back thinking that it was just a bad connection. I treat them to more "Hello?...hello?" until they're completely fuming. The telemarketer will start yelling, cursing, and generally making a spectacle of themselves in the little telemarketeer farm. Their boss will notice this (or find out through the call logs) and the telemarketer will be in trouble. After this is done enough times, telemarketeers will fear calling you.:)

    I adminned at a call center once(incoming calls only), but I'm sure any telemarketeer will get in some sort of trouble for this.

    --
    /*drunk.. fix later*/
    1. Re:If you *really* want to get at telemarketeers. by Rocky · · Score: 1

      I've done this, too. It's actually quite effective. I had one telemarketer go "Whatever..." after the third round of

      "Hello, this is Spumco.."

      "Hello?"

      "Yes sir, we are offering..."

      "Hello?!?"

      "Sir, can you hear me? I'm with Spu..."

      "HELLO?"

      "What-everrr..." CLICK

      Hehehe

      --
      "I'm an old-fashioned type of guy. I worship the Sun and Moon as gods. And fear them."
    2. Re:If you *really* want to get at telemarketeers. by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 1
      "HELLO?"

      "What-everrr..." CLICK

      That's the key. To make the marketeer hang up.

      When I SysAdminned at a call center, it was really quite amusing watching one of the telemarketeers get all cheesed off, then getting a good talking to from manglement^Wmanagement.

      Not too long ago, I had the joy of really ticking off a marketeer. I did the usual, "hello?" thing. Got called back, and after a few "hello?"s, the marketeer started getting all ticked off and screamed, "Dammit! I know you can hear me!". I started laughing, but continued my "hello?" and enjoyed the satisfaction of knowing that there isn't a damn thing they can do about it.

      --
      /*drunk.. fix later*/
  67. sending those envelopes back by drfrog · · Score: 1

    with a brick attached they have to pay for it

    --
    back in the day we didnt have no old school
  68. Re:before the web... by AllynKC · · Score: 1

    -----
    hmmmm... try as I might, I still don't think that's funny.
    And what does soliciting for donations for (often) worthy causes have to do with spam?
    And what flavor of crack are the moderators smoking today?
    -----

    But you forget - the cause is rarely the one doing the actual soliciting. The telemarketing companies solicit business from these causes. The telemarketing companies then can legally use that organization's name when soliciting money from individuals. The problem is that the telemarketers keep anywhere from 50% up to 90% of the funds which they raise in this way

    As a result, I NEVER donate money via a phone solicitation. If there's a charitable organization which I wish to support, I always contact that charity directly and mail the money directly to the charity.

  69. please help!!!! by prisoner · · Score: 1

    31337 haX0rs have taken control of our systems servers and are spamming our mail servers....please. what goes around comes around.

  70. Re:I propose to Ashcroft that we create an ASDS by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1
    Finally, if you have caller ID, if it says unavailable or private, then take that to mean your status as well. If its important, they'll leave a message.

    Unfortunately, that's just what telemarketers do these days. Some unscrupulous telemarketers even have their autophone system set up so that it only leaves messages on machines and will hang up if a live person gets on the line.

    --
    All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  71. Re:before the web... by donutello · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine runs a business from home with her father and two employees. Every time they get a call like that they tell them they need to speak with Mr. Randy Stevens. Phone calls for Mr. Randy Stevens get put on hold waiting for him because he's very busy.

    So far he's already been pre-approved for 3 platinum credit cards based on his excellent credit record.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  72. Postage-paid by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers. Empty. Eat that! 30 cents out of your pocket! Yeah!

    If the postage was *already* paid, the only thing you are costing them is the annoyance of having to open your worthless mail (AFAIK, they pay whether or not you actually use the prepaid envelope). Of course this, in itself, is probably worth it. However, I would feel sorry for the poor postal employees that now have to send junk mail *both* ways.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:Postage-paid by dman123 · · Score: 1
      If the postage was *already* paid, the only thing you are costing them is the annoyance of having to open your worthless mail (AFAIK, they pay whether or not you actually use the prepaid envelope).

      Actually, I thought it was the opposite. In other words, the post office adds money to your "tab" every time they deliver one of those letters to you. Sometimes the non-profit company mail I get asks for me to put a stamp over the "No Postage Necessary" stamp on the envelope in order to save them money.

      It might work both ways. Maybe if there is an exact amount printed in the stamp area, it is prepaid. A "No Postage Necessary" stamp then means postpaid. I wouldn't bet my life on either assumption.

      --
      dman123 forever!

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
  73. Re:Don't just send them empty! by merchant_x · · Score: 2

    I've been doing this for years. Instead of empty I toss in some prizes. That way the person opening the letter will have something to talk about on their break. All kinds of things have found a new home this way:

    - Little plastic army men.
    - Out of focus photographs.
    - Change. (Costing more in postage than it's worth)
    - Lettuce.
    - A printed warning about the Goodtimes virus.

    One more to add to your list

    - Used condom

  74. Re:spam fighting by rawburt · · Score: 1

    Get them on every mailing list you know, find some porn-lists and put them there too. Go to a couple of freebie-sites and use the spammers e-mailaddress. Call IRS. If you can find a real mailing address, preferably a home address, subscribe them to every newspaper known to man, call 112 (that's our 911 in Europe) and tell them the spammers house is on fire. Send a package with 21 bananas, a can of maggots and a pound of roast beef. If you live nearby, sneak up to their office and nail the door shut. Paint the sidewalk outside their office pink. Submit a story to slashdot with the spammers website in the headline and get it accepted - repeat this once a week. Order expensive stuff in their name through mailorder. Send out fake advertisments in the spammers name.

    --
    --- oops
  75. Re:Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by wowbagger · · Score: 3
    (You are correct about the English rendition of their moniker...)

    A friend of mine gave me a very simple approach to get to leave temporiarily: Answer the door with your phone in your hand.

    For a more permanant solution, answer the door with the lower receiver of your AR-15 in one hand, and your cleaning cloth in the other.

    I actually did a variant of this once: I lived in an apartment with an exterior landing that was shared with another apartment. In that other apartment lived (as near as I could tell) a large number of jail-bait teenybobbers who thought they were God's gift to the universe. They would
    • Hang out on the stairs, and not get out of anybody's way
    • Ask my friends, "Are you over 21? Can you buy beer? Would you buy us a beer?" (to which one of my friends replied, "Yes, but my price would include a live chicken and a weed-whacker")
    • Play their atrocious music as loudly as possible

    (Before anybody makes the obvious comment: I don't mess with jailbait.)

    One day, my friends and I had gone shooting at one of their farms, and we had returned to my place to clean the weapons. The teeny's were doing their usual, hanging around being in everybody's way.

    Funny, how people get out of your way when you have a rifle over one shoulder, a shotgun in one hand, an ammo can in the other, and have two holsters on your belt.

    After the six of us had each made three trips from the cars, and had finally finished carrying the firearms into the apartment, and had started on the reflex weapons (longbows, crossbows, etc.), the teeny's disappeared into their apartment.

    Funny, ever since then the aways got out of our way, never bothered my friends or me, and kept their music at a reasonable level....
  76. Re:Opt Out from Credit Card Mailings by kbarrett · · Score: 1
    It is real and does work, but it's not forever.

    It's only for 2 years, then you have to do it again.


    ---

    Keith Barrett (kgb)
    Red Hat HA Team

    --

    ---

    Keith Barrett (kgb)

  77. Re:Postage-paid envelopes have surcharges by Holyscapegoat · · Score: 1

    Well, I very much doubt that you can be entered into a contract by returning a non-signed envelope. I would just ignore such an invoice if they sent one. If they tried to sue me, I can't expect a judge would take them very seriously when they said "well, there's no signature and there's not even a name, but this barcode here indicates that the defendant returned this mail

    They may not be able to sue, but that won't bother them. They'll just send the "debt" to a collection agency so they can screw up your credit with the Credit reporting bureaus. Then, trying to clear your name becomes impossible because you have a semi-legitimate company saying to the CRB's "no, he really owes that". Bye Bye car loan, mortgage, etc...

  78. Re:Fax spam by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

    Fax spam is illegal. There should be a number to get off the list, but often it isn't there. The FCC has info on their website - you will have to browse for it - but i seem to recall that there is a place you can mail the junk fax to so the government can prosecute it. One of the biggest offenders is fax.com - they send junk fax on behalf of The Center for Missing and Exploited Children, whose main sponsors are Computer Associates and Sun. (can you tell i did some legwork?) Anyway, many of these scum are trying to use a loophole in the anti-telemarketing law that has exceptions for calls made "by, or on behalf of, non-profit organizations" - this clause does NOT apply to fax.

    Anyway, if you can find out who is sending the fax spam, you can prosecute them, and also the company who hired the spammer - every fax spam I have seen has some toll-free number to call to buy the goods/services advertised. I would suggest adding to your answering machine (if recording time permits) "This machine does not accept unsolicited fax ads. By sending you agree to pay a proofreading fee of $500 per page"

    (alter amount to taste - probably between 500 and 1500/page) good luck

    --
    The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  79. Re:Don't just send them empty! by 42acres · · Score: 1

    oops
    Why NOT tape the postage paid envelope to a box containing about 40 pounds of rocks?

  80. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by CharmQuark · · Score: 1
    The assertion that we have even reached the point of an 'eye for an eye' is optimistic. The concept, as I understand it, is to try to make the punishment commensurate to the crime. In other words, instead of declaring war on another village for the death of a horse, we, in a fit of mercy, might just accept a replacement horse along with an apology and perhaps inconvenience money.

    I do not believe this relatively primitive concept is universally accepted. For example, under this code one might accept that a murderer deserves to die, but there is nothing that says we are allowed to watch and relish in that death. Likewise, most of our drug laws become suspect if we apply the principle faithfully.

    An eye for an eye is something we are still, for the most part, trying to learn. Most people do not understand the it's limiting nature, and instead, ignorantly try to use it justify excessive forms of retribution.

  81. Re:Dude, evolve some more by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Fishing weights would probably work too. Fold a few into a piece of paper, stuff it in and send it. Mind you don't go over 15 ounces.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  82. Jerzy Kosinski sent lead by perlstar · · Score: 1

    Jerzy Kosinski, the author of The Painted Bird, would do this with the lead plates used by his publisher to print his books.

  83. Junk mail postage rates by scottmartinnet · · Score: 1
    Actually, junk mail gets rates much lower than standard first class mail (at least in the U.S.). Generally, for the standard envelope, the paper spammer pays around 10-15 cents to get it delivered. Of course, it costs more than that to deliver it (the USPS loses money), so the cost is taken out of the 33 (sorry, 34) that we pay for first class. So, in effect, every time you buy a stamp you pay for the privilege of junk mail.

    Now, why could that be? Surely it couldn't be the Direct Marketing Association's powerful lobby.

  84. Re:Nice way to screw the post office by Fizgig · · Score: 1

    However, in the US the junk mailers get a better rate than everyone else since the 1st class mail subsidizes the junk mail.

    I don't think that's true. I've heard that they keep the price of 1st class stamps at pretty much what it costs to send the thing. The post office makes most of its money from junk mail, though, both the sending thereof and the selling of addresses.

  85. Dude, evolve some more by OlympicSponsor · · Score: 3

    Empty? No, tape them to hunks of steel or large bricks. Then you cost them a couple of bucks instead of a measly $.30. Apparently some (all?) postmasters will refuse to deliver these, but I suspect that isn't strictly legal. Anyway, it puts pressure on the PO to get things changed as well.
    --
    MailOne

    --
    Non-meta-modded "Overrated" mods are killing Slashdot
    (Hey Ryan! Here's your proof!)
    1. Re:Dude, evolve some more by c_g12 · · Score: 1

      Or, tape them to large bricks before tossing them through the junkmailer's window.

    2. Re:Dude, evolve some more by tono · · Score: 1

      or include goatse.cx pictures

      --
      cheese logs keep my wang warm at night.
    3. Re:Dude, evolve some more by bughunter · · Score: 2

      I read that article several weeks ago (thanks to Robot Wisdom 'blog for the link) and was left with the distinct impression that the postal workers got at least as much amusement out of it as we did, if not more. Otherwise, many of those items probably would never have been delivered.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    4. Re:Dude, evolve some more by tzanger · · Score: 1

      This is why you can send mail without a stamp - it still gets delivered.

      No it doesn't; it gets returned "insufficient postage. Canada's lienient, not stupid.

    5. Re:Dude, evolve some more by Hoarke42 · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite was one for a credit card offer. (As a side note, you know it's not going to be a good card when it says "NO SECURITY DEPOSIT" in giant red letters as its biggest selling point.) It just so happened either Pepsi or Coke was running a contest, and I just finished a bottle with a cap that said "Sorry, please try again." I simply enclosed that in the postage-paid envelope, a couple packets of salt from Wendy's, and wrote a nice little rant about how I would have to be on crack, not just any crack but good Columbian crack, to go for their offer.

    6. Re:Dude, evolve some more by alexburke · · Score: 2

      In Canada I understand this to be untrue - ANYTHING with an address and put in a PostOffice Box MUST be delivered - no matter what it is. Im almost certain its federal law. This is why you can send mail without a stamp - it still gets delivered.

      You're full of shit. I live in Toronto, and occasionally I've forgotten to put a stamp on an envelope. I get it back in my mailbox a day or so later with a big "Return To Sender" sticker on it with a transparent backing material. There's text on the label saying to put more/proper postage on the letter, peel the big sticker off (leaving the clear backing layer on the envelope), and remail it.

      However, if you put YOUR address in the main "to" area, and THEIR address in the "from" area, put no postage on it, and drop it in a mailbox, it MIGHT get there, complete with the "Return To Sender" sticker, if the post office doesn't catch on. They sometimes assume that it mistakenly got that far in the system without a stamp, and promptly send it "back".

      --

    7. Re:Dude, evolve some more by GordoSlasher · · Score: 1

      Stuff all your other junk mail in the business reply envelopes. There's nothing like Citibank paying to receive a dozen credit card offers from their competitors.

    8. Re:Dude, evolve some more by sporktoast · · Score: 5

      I think flat scrap iron would be the thing. That way it will fit *inside* the envelope. See this article for more info about what you might be likely to get away with mailing. And be sure to give your postal servant a small box of chocolates as a thanks.

      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    9. Re:Dude, evolve some more by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4
      Empty? No, tape them to hunks of steel or large bricks. Then you cost them a couple of bucks instead of a measly $.30. Apparently some (all?) postmasters will refuse to deliver these, but I suspect that isn't strictly legal. Anyway, it puts pressure on the PO to get things changed as well.
      Don't worry, the ever resourceful Post Office has tought of it, too, and it won't work.

      Sorry.

      --

  86. giving back by wickline · · Score: 2

    whenever I give out an address online, I make it unique to the recipient...
    recipient_info__date@my.com

    If that address ever gets spammed, I send an email to the person who gave out my address thanking them for the spam and informing them that they can have the rest of it. Then I permanently redirect that address to some permanent email address of theirs (like sales@ or service@) so they can deal with the consequences of their actions (and I no longer have to).

    For telemarkerters:
    tell the insurance folks you're immortal
    tell the newspaper folks you're illiterate
    tell the telephone folks you're telepathic

    tell anyone else that you're in the middle of some satisfying goatsex, and that they can piss off unless they're Natalie Portman and want to hear the goat bleat.

    1. Re:giving back by IronChef · · Score: 2

      >tell the newspaper folks you're illiterate

      I tell the newspaper people "I already subscribe." That always works, they get right off the phone. No one has challenged me.

  87. Re:Don't just send them empty! by Zogg · · Score: 1

    You've forgotten the most important element:
    -A very large spoonful of flour.
    Not only does it weigh more, but when their letter opening machine gets to yours it either jams up or shoots flour all over the place, effectively disabling them for at least a good 10 minutes. Plus, in the event they open it by hand they get flour all over their desk. The possibilities are endless.

  88. Junk Mail Revenge by apg · · Score: 1

    What also amuses me is my new hobby: I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers. Empty. Eat that! 30 cents out of your pocket!

    Even more fun: Tape the envelope or reply card to a brick before you mail it.

    1. Re:Junk Mail Revenge by Schnedt+Microne · · Score: 1

      That's an old yippie myth. The first reference to it that I know of is out of Abbie Hoffman's book 'Steal This Book' (do you have a copy? I do. They're kinda rare, especially in libraries ;)

      The truth is that the Post Office will discard anything of the sort. You can put as much heavy material as possible into the envelope, but don't just tape a postcard to a brick and expect it to get delivered.

      --
      Hay thar.
    2. Re:Junk Mail Revenge by chakmol · · Score: 2

      What also amuses me is my new hobby: I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers. Empty. Eat that! 30 cents out of your pocket!

      I don't do this because I really don't mind junk mail through the regular post. They are paying to use the system, it brings in revenue for the Post Office, and it's easy to throw away. E-mail Spam, however, has brought down MY e-mail account on 2 occaisions. Some Spammer had a software fart both times and sent me each Spam 1000's of times filling my account to the limit and making my mail bounce.

      Also, Spammers frequently forge common e-mail addresses in the "reply to" or "from" field, so if you are "steve12**@hotmail.com" for example, you can kiss your account goodbye.

  89. Nice way to screw the post office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Great. To get back at junk mailers, you propose damaging multi-million dollar equipment owned by the POST OFFICE? Nice. Next time the price of stamps go up, I have you to thank, ASSHOLE. The fact that this post was modded up to 5 is simply more proof that most intelligent life has left Slashdot. Posting anonymously to preserve my hard earned karma. vought1221

    1. Re:Nice way to screw the post office by thogard · · Score: 2

      I think he was talking about the equipment of the junk mailer, not the post office.

      However, in the US the junk mailers get a better rate than everyone else since the 1st class mail subsidizes the junk mail. That would make the US post office a target of the gillter idea. If they find out enough people are going to take out their million dollar machines every few days due to this junk mail, It might get a point accross but most likely would lead to arrest.

    2. Re:Nice way to screw the post office by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 2

      I don't see how this would necessarily follow.
      You put the sparklies in the envelope. The
      envelope stays closed until it gets to the
      junk mailer?

      Then, when the junk mailer opens it, it gets
      all over HIS sorters, not those of the post
      office?

    3. Re:Nice way to screw the post office by lemox · · Score: 1

      Umm, it won't screw up any of the post office's machinery unless they OPEN IT. In which case, I'd say they deserve it.

      --

      "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

    4. Re:Nice way to screw the post office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Legally, each class of mail must cover it's own costs. The USPS mentions that in their press release about the rate increase on Jan 7th: http://www.usps.com/news/2001rate.htm

    5. Re:Nice way to screw the post office by M.+Silver · · Score: 2
      However, in the US the junk mailers get a better rate than everyone else since the 1st class mail subsidizes the junk mail.

      Actually, it's t'other way 'round. The junk mail subsidizes the first-class. Bulk mail gets a "better" rate because all the labor-intensive stuff is already done: it's pre-sorted, pre-coded, and whatever. This subsidizes the postal employee who has to spend ten minutes deciphering your Great-Aunt Hilda's spidery handwriting on the Christmas card she sends you every year.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    6. Re:Nice way to screw the post office by netmeister · · Score: 1

      I think he meant it messed things up on the direct mail end. If it's a closed envelope it shouldn't do anything until somebody tries to open it.

      --
      Where's the beef?
    7. Re:Nice way to screw the post office by CharlieG · · Score: 2

      The sorters are at the junk mailer, not the PO. The get sliced open and the INSIDE sorted.

      A bit of inside scoop - the reason the ALL have you afix some sort of stamp is that they usually have magnetic ink, so the can autosort

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  90. Tragedy by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    Tragic.

    No, not that UUNET fell over- the fact that it got back up :(

  91. Richard caught quoting some words -- :) by the_ph0x · · Score: 1

    I saw richard talking to some of the members of the press.

    .ph0x

  92. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by fghg · · Score: 1

    who may be in his business because of factors outside his control like debt or bills for an illness in the family, etc.
    Are you suggesting that its' not his fault he is spamming? Or that given enough reason it is ok to spam. So does this mean it's OK to rob a bank because my poor sick mom needs money for treatment?
    You suggest that we can't pick and choose which victims to protect but you also can't pick and choose who you punish.

  93. They got what they deserved. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1
    UUNet is famous for being the center of all spam; no wonder they're blocked by ORBS. I'm glad to see the pipebomb blow up in the terrorist's face (metaphorically speaking).

    Now if only we could do the same to all the ribald trolls of Slashdot.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  94. Re:Some useful techniques for fighting spamsters by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    >Most of my spam mail originates from a uu.net address. Which is kind of ironic, cause I own 400 shares of Worldcom, who own UU.NET in the first place. If something isn't done soon, I'm filing a shareholder's proposal at the next Annual Meeting ...

    How long have you held your WCOM stock? If it's long enough to be able to make a shareholder's proposal, please consider doing so.

    There are probably some folks at MAPS who would very much like to talk to you.

  95. Re:Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by sammy+baby · · Score: 2

    You're close - the Anglicized version would be "Jehovah's Witnesses".

    I did carry on a brief doctrinal discussion with a Jehovah's Witness to try and explain why I'm not a Christan. It was rough going. A JW isn't interested in hearing you say you've made a rational decision that their religion isn't for you, because reason doesn't really enter into it.

    The best story I know on this subject involves a friend of a friend, who was actually working as a butcher at the time. Upon being forewarned that the witnesses were canvassing their block, he put his apron on and grabbed the biggest knife he could find. When they showed up, he threw open the door, and shouted back to his wife with glee - "Sarah! Guess what! More Christians!"

    They didn't come back.

  96. First Step by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    The first step, BEFORE you dump empty postage-paid envelope into the nearest mail box, is to affix it to an old telephone book with lots and lots of clear tape. _NOW_ you're cookin' on all burners!

    --
    **>>BELCH
    1. Re:First Step by dattaway · · Score: 2

      And simply stuff other junk mail into the envelope. Saves a trip to the trashcan everytime.

    2. Re:First Step by DennisZeMenace · · Score: 1
      I put a single dead AAA battery in the envelope. That's how i get rid of them ('recycle' them).

      As a PalmPilot 1 user, i have an almost infinite supply of dead AAA batteries. :-)

  97. *sigh* by schon · · Score: 1

    I went to their website as described on their emails and unsubscribe.

    Congratulations.. you just got yourself added to their "This email address is Real, and the guy reads our spam!" Gold List.

    The Proof:
    Well the next month they send me another email so I went through the same motions again, and it said that the email address was already marked for removal

    You've just guaranteed that you will receive TONS and TONS more spam.

    An experiment: Get a new email address, and don't give to anybody (as in nobody - don't put it in any mail program, don't give it to anybody, don't put it on a web page, make sure it's completely secret.).. then go to that 'remove' page you mentioned, and enter it in.. then check it next month, and see how much spam they sent it..

    I just wish there was a spam filter that you can use that would return unknown user like an account died, so the spam programs would automatically remove the user.

    Are you really that naieve?

    Spam programs don't remove users, ever!.. spammers use bogus MAIL FROM: email addresses because they don't care if the spam bounces... think about it.. if a spammer cared if an email address was real or not, would they be spamming in the first place?

    You get back at spammers by contacting their ISP, not by talking to them directly. Spammers are (by definition) scum, just like crap you step in. If you step in something unpleasant, you don't reason with it, you get a stick and scrape it off.

  98. spam fighting by scotch · · Score: 1
    If I get spam, sometimes I try to complain to abuse@ and postmaster@, but I prefer to be a little more of a pain:

    • If the SPAM has a website, I'll got to that site, and look for a complaint form or email there.
    • If the web site has an order form, I'll fill it out with bogus information like name="spam sucks", address="1600 pennsylvania ave", etc
    • If they have a 1-800 number, I call that and leave a short message telling them no one likes spam
    Any other good ideas (that won't get me arrested, hopefully)?

    --
    XML causes global warming.
    1. Re:spam fighting by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Check for toll free phone numbers via whois. If their office is convenient to you, drive by and say "hi". Better yet, put up (anonymous) flyers around their neighborhood stating that they are child molesters or some other horrendous creature (note: IANAL, so this one may have crossed the line).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:spam fighting by jaa · · Score: 5

      check out spamcop. They'll notify abuse@, postmaster@, etc., on your behalf. Just cut and paste your spam into their web form. Their cgi does the rest. Scans the headers, locates the true source(s) of the spam, looks up any links/email addresses in the message itself. Works great.

      --

      Never meant half of the things I said to you. So you know, there's a half that might be true - G. Phillips

    3. Re:spam fighting by -stax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, quit sending stuff to my house!
      -stax
      /. poster #104543567

    4. Re:spam fighting by heytal · · Score: 1
      If the e-mail has a URL and you visit it, you solve the purpose of the spam. You increase the hit rate, and they gain a penny or two for the advertising banners that are showed up to you when you visit that place.

      If you send a mail to abuse@ or postmaster@ then maybe you are validating your entry in their database ;-)

      1-800 numbers are all bogus.. leaving a message won't really help. Maybe the spammers get a commission on the number of calls the 1-800 number receives, and you are helping them ;-)

      --
      No sig here...

    5. Re:spam fighting by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Spammers like your attitude as you described. When you visit or send an email, you prove to them your email exists. Bingo, you are a prefered customer.

      Next time, look at the email headers at the connection that delivered to your mail server. Try to identify the ISP identified by the ip address and deliver your message to abuse@ISP.

    6. Re:spam fighting by scotch · · Score: 1
      Spammers like your attitude as you described.

      Then they are idiots. I guess that fact wasn't really disputed. What I try to do, not everytime, is to be more of a pain in the ass to them than they are to me. I would disagree with you that the worth in $$ of knowing that my email address is valid exceeds the cost in $$ of a call to their 1-800 number, for example. How would they determine, even if they got my phone number when I called, that my email is valid?

      Next question: do you think they have the knowledge to associate http transaction from my @home email IP with my @home email address? I doubt it, so ordering bogus stuff from their web site also doesn't risk validating my email address, but might might possibly cause them some pain and suffering.

      Mailing to complaint addresses on their webpage is most effective in combination with complaints to abuse@ISP as you suggest.

      Thanks for playing

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    7. Re:spam fighting by pen · · Score: 1
      When filling out web forms, use MAILER-DAEMON@localhost or MAILER-DAEMON@[127.0.0.1] or MAILER-DAEMON@domain.ext as your email address.

      --

    8. Re:spam fighting by mistered · · Score: 1
      Calling 1-800 numbers, or filling out bogus information on web sites, is relatively safe and it's an activity I sometimes enjoy. However, never fill out your real email address on a spammer's website or reply to a postmaster@ or abuse@ address that you aren't sure belongs to a trusted ISP.


      The problem isn't with one spammer knowing your email address is valid. It's the fact that once one spammer knows this, it doesn't take long for your address to make it onto a CD with millions of email addresses for other spammers to use. Such CDs are often spamvertized. Once your email address gets on to one of these, you can count on a great increase in your spam volume.


      I run my own mailserver, so I just create throw-away accounts as I please when filling out web-forms, etc. My spam-reporting from: address is also such a throw-away alias. So far I haven't received any spam through it, but as soon as I do it disappears and I move on to another.

      --
      Enjoy your job, make lots of money, work within the law. Choose any two.
  99. Some useful techniques for fighting spamsters by WillSeattle · · Score: 2

    First, the FTC is collecting info, for possible action.

    Forward the spam, with All Headers visible (different choices on browsers), to:

    uce@ftc.gov

    Secondly, if it is an attempt to solicit money for supposed investment purposes, it's the SEC's job to police these babies. Go to www.sec.gov and find the email address of your regional SEC office. Mine, for example, is sanfrancisco@sec.gov, but yours may differ. Then forward, with All Headers visible, the spam you get concerning investments (usually fraudulent) to that email address.

    Why make the government do the work? Because until enough people complain and help all those Level 9 operatives, nothing will be done.

    If using PINE, then just bounce the email to that address.

    Also, always forward to the abuse@yourisp.com (or abuse-nonverbose@yourisp.com if they're smart) any such emails. And any legitimate ISPs (hint, not wierd ones, they may be spam collector sites) along the trail the email came. This helps them shut down those loopholes.

    Most of my spam mail originates from a uu.net address. Which is kind of ironic, cause I own 400 shares of Worldcom, who own UU.NET in the first place. If something isn't done soon, I'm filing a shareholder's proposal at the next Annual Meeting ...

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
    1. Re:Some useful techniques for fighting spamsters by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

      How long have you held your WCOM stock? If it's long enough to be able to make a shareholder's proposal, please consider doing so.

      Since Oct 18, 2000. I'll check the most recent annual report and see if I'm in the filing zone.
      Nothing like a little corporate and media attention to uu.net being a spam haven.

      --
      --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  100. Re:Junk mail subsidizes first class mail by AllynKC · · Score: 1

    Postage for "junk mail" does not subsidize anything. It merely keeps my recycle bin full. Check this link to the USPS website.
    It's a story about the recent rate increases.
    The important phrase to note is: Overall, rates are rising 4.6 percent, although price increases vary some by class of mail in accordance with the legal mandate for each class of mail to cover its own cost.

  101. Re:spamcop by mistered · · Score: 1
    A couple of things:

    1. Just because you have to "push a button," it doesn't mean that the email is not spam. Websites that allow an email address to be added to the list or be sent mail without some verification can be construed as spamming. If someone else puts my email address in such a form and as a result I get added to a list, I would complain to the site's administrators. See also greeting-card spam.

    2. Spamcop only looks up address from email pasted into its form, and clearly states "Please make sure this email IS spam" and "Report only email addresses and web sites which you think are used by the spammer. If you are unsure, do not check any boxes which default off. This will send mail to a network administrator. Please do not waste their time if this is not spam. The last thing we want is for administrators to stop taking these spam reports seriously." There's nothing to stop me from putting non-spam into SpamCop and complaining to random admins, other than the possibility SpamCop will disable my account.

    --
    Enjoy your job, make lots of money, work within the law. Choose any two.
  102. Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by MouseR · · Score: 2

    I think the very best spammers have always been Jeovah witnesses (or whatever they're called in english; it's "témoins de Jéovah" in french).

    Bt I got rid of mine indefinatelly, Ibeleive, as it's been a whole year and a half since their last visit.

    The last one to knock on my door, I actually invited him for the post-dinner (supper) tea and dessert. My girlfriend was furious, but now is happy of the outcome.

    I actually had their "blue book" at had (a gift of a friend of mine, that came to that very same diner for the occasion). This book is the definitive know-it-all book of answers for the doubtfull. They give this book to people they think have bought their story, to reel them into the boat.

    After a lengthy (3hour) evening, I ended up ending the discussion by throwing the blue book (mine) into the fireplace. Ever seen Fahrenheit 451?

    Beatty ran out my place, while I was reminding him my mortgage was for another 21 years.

    It was mean, but worth it!

    Karma karma karma karma karmeleon: it comes and goes, it comes and goes.

    1. Re:Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by BotKeeper · · Score: 1

      Mainstream Christianity considers Jehovah's Witnesses to be a cult. Probe Ministries has this page as well as this page which discuss the discrepencies in Johovah's Witnesses's theology. You might want to consider asking a JW who visits to explain these issues. Both parties would come to a better understanding of each other. I do feel it is better to build bridges than destroy them.

    2. Re:Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by reemul · · Score: 1

      Jehovah's Witnesses are fun to mess with. Best story of thwarting their spread I heard was an SCA guy I knew a long time ago. He'd been getting pestered by them for a while, and they just didn't seem to be taking no for an answer. So the next time they came by, he took his battle axe and did the "Here's Johnny" thing: he chopped a hole in his own front door, stuck his head through the hole, and asked them what the hell they wanted.

      Expensive, since he had to replace the door, but very very effective.

      -reemul
      Everything I know, I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.

      --
      You're just jealous 'cuz the voices talk to *me*
    3. Re:Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by rark · · Score: 1

      heh. The best story along these lines that I know of came from alt.pagan several years ago (back when I actually read it, before nntp had such a low signal-to-noise ratio)

      So some JW/mormon/whatever came by the door as the posters' family was getting ready for some circle (I don't recall if it was Esbat or a Sabbat or what, but whatever, doesn't really matter) and their teenaged daughter opened the door (which opened into the currently-set-up living room), greeted the prolystizers and then shouted "mom! dad! the sacrifices are here!"

    4. Re:Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by dyskordus · · Score: 1
      I just picked up one of the "no bible thumper" signs (bought mine at a head shop, but you can get them at evolvefish. It is very necessary, especially since I live on a street with 3 churches on it. It works like a charm!

      --
      "Reality is less than television."-Brian Oblivion
  103. My spam from that guy in Planet of the Apes by zhensel · · Score: 1

    I recently got a letter from the NRA claiming that I had been "specially selected" from among the fellow gunowners of my community to fill out a survey intended to be sent to Congress to fight for MY second amendment rights.

    Now, this is all well and good, but as a 17-year-old, non-gunowning, green party supporter I found it a little awkward that I had been deemed fit to carry the tremendous burden of this responsibility. I filled out the survey and also included a carefully worded letter to Mr. Wayne LaPierre. I requested that, though I did not register as a member as requested in the letter, that I still be sent the same black/gold hat that membership entitles. I thought it'd go well with my 16-inch Chartlon Heston Planet of the Apes figure (complete with ANSA space suit). Though I don't know if I was able to aid the NRA as they requested, I do think that this junk mail enabled me to vastly improve upon my Chuck H. shrine.

    1. Re:My spam from that guy in Planet of the Apes by Detritus · · Score: 2
      I used to get tons of junk mail from pro-gun control groups like HCI and NCBH, probably because I'm on some mailing lists that are associated with leftist tendencies.

      As a gun owner and member of the NRA, I didn't appreciate Sarah Brady telling me that I was a pawn of Satan for owning a gun.

      I sent them some NRA decals. That didn't work, they continued to send me their junk. Then I filled the reply envelope with expended .22 rimfire shell casings and sent it back to them. That worked :-). I figure that they must have placed me on the "danger: psychotic gun owner" blacklist.

      The NRA is pretty bad about sending out tons of direct mail solicitations.

      I used to give money to the local public television station until they became extremely aggressive in sending out direct mail begging for more money. It seems that any donation results in getting put on the "soft touch with money" mailing list.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  104. Junkbusters works well getting rid of junk mail by Captain+Chad · · Score: 2

    Junkbusters has a comprehensive list of mass snail-mailers. You enter your information, it composes the letters, and you print them out and mail them (addresses included, so no envelopes necessary). I did this and was amazed at the reduction in the amount of mail that I received.

    --
    Check out Chad's News
  105. Hard Spam by mdavids · · Score: 1

    I like the solution that Abbie Hoffman proposed for junk mail: When you get something with a reply-paid envelope in it, tape the envelope to a house brick and pop it in the post. The spammer has to pay for the weight.

  106. More like DEVOLUTION... by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Hey, "evolve past swordfighting"? What's up with that, doesn't everybody get in a good sword fight at least once a month or so?
    Me, I pick up a practice blade of some sort at least once a week. Good aerobic exercise, and if the code duello ever gets reinstated I plan to kick some serious butt ;^)
    --Charlie

  107. Not just return envelopes by sharkey · · Score: 1

    You can run up the tab on the shit that ends in your snail-mail box, if you don't mind some physical effort. Since it's bulk charged, the USPS doesn't postmark it. Take any or all inbound junk snail-mail, and drop it in the nearest corner box. It'll show up in your mailbox again in a few days, having been charged again to the jerk who sent it. If you don't mind having snowdrifts of this shit in your mail box, run up their mailing charges!

    I usually only do this with a couple items of junk mail at a time. I prefer not to have drifts of this shit crammed into my box;-)

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Not just return envelopes by nuwayser · · Score: 1
      If you don't mind having snowdrifts of this shit in your mail box, run up their mailing charges!

      Fourth Class mail is pre-paid. All you would succeed in doing is pissing off your local mail carrier, who is required to deliver the stuff.

      --
      "The cup... the drop... it's a YES!"
    2. Re:Not just return envelopes by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Learning new things everyday. I thought it got charged every time it ran through the PO.

      --

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  108. Re:If only everyone were like me.... by vandelais · · Score: 1

    AAAAHHHHHHHH! Tornado! is pretty good too.

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
  109. remove the code first by madmancarman · · Score: 1
    I remember a little piece on TV a while back about those blow-in Business Reply Mail postcards, and the reporter mentioned a lot of people send them back blank. It turns out that there are codes (usually printed in one of the bottom corners) that are the marketing form of cookies - it tells them what magazine they were taken from, what region of the country, etc. They still find this information useful, because it gives them an idea of how effective their cards are in which magazines.

    So, if you really want to piss them off, remove/white-out/use a black marker on that code first, because then they can't get any marketing data from it.

    --
    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
  110. End Junk Mail by MyopicProwls · · Score: 1
    http://www.the-dma.org/consumers/consumerassistanc e.html

    Go there and there is information on how to take yourself off some major direct mail lists.

    MyopicProwls

    --

    MyopicProwls
    My homepage

  111. Re:Spam revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


    That previously mentioned semi-flappable image is illustrated here.

  112. Re:Could be, but is it? by Steve+Linford · · Score: 1

    An 'Anonymous Coward' said: Look at lindfords own 'stats'. He claims that UNet causes 30 Billion spams a year. He also says that UUnet sends 2 Million spams a day. Tht just does not add up.

    It sure doesn't. Read it again, properly. 2 Million spams is the number that hit Pipex' servers. I said UUNET send _far more_ than 2 million spams per day. I can assure you that UUNET spammers currently bulk 3 billion spams per year - divide that figure by days/year to get the average daily amount.

    Steve Linford
    The Spamhaus Project

  113. before the web... by small_dick · · Score: 5

    ...my pop was owner of a company and got several calls a day requesting donations.

    he finally started saying "Oh, you need to talk to the corporate office, and ask for Mr. Wolf."

    Of course, he gave them the ph. number of the local zoo...

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
    1. Re:before the web... by babbage · · Score: 2
      Or a different variation -- whenever I got a telemarker's call while I was in college, I'd put them on hold & forward the call to the campus police department. Not many of them called back...

      Then of course there's the Seinfeld response: "Gee, I'm kind of busy right now. Tell you what -- why don't you give me your home number, and I'll call you while you're having dinner, and we can talk all about it." Strangely enough, they never seem to take to that idea. Can't imagine why... :)



  114. A couple of humble clarifications by clary · · Score: 1
    That is a truly ridiculous argument for "an- eye-for-an-eye", mate. Do you think it is ethical for you to go down to the market for a bottle of Pepsi? Well, according to the Categorical Imperitive, no, because if EVERYONE when down to the market anarchy would ensue with riots and murders leading to pitched battles as the supplies of Pepsi dwindled, and could eventually lead to the downfall of Western Civilization. Give a break.
    I agree with you that the categorical imperative does not especially speak to the concept of an eye for an eye, but you throw up a strawman to discredit the C.I. unfairly. Kant wasn't saying you need to consider what happens if everyone does the same specific thing at the same time. Rather, he was saying, consider what would happen if everyone viewed an act as ethical and did it freely. So in your example, a better question would be, is it ethical to drink Pepsi? What if everyone drank Pepsi (not necessarily buying it all at the same instant)?

    As for your, er, analysis of the Prisoner's dilemma, "tit for tat" maximizes only the two prisoner's COLLECTIVE expected utility. The best result for a given prisoner is to sell out the other prisoner given that the other prisoner doesn't talk. That's why it's called a dilemma, mate. Tit for Tat did NOT win, because if you believe the other prisoner is honest, you can screw him and do better for yourself than if you were honest.
    You misunderstand the problem here. I am not familiar with the specific "tit for tat" reference, but the Prisoner's Dilemma is only interesting in its iterated form. In this kind of contest, the prisoners are forced to choose over and over again, and allowed to remember what other prisoners did on previous iterations. It is this memory that keeps "always screwing the other guy" from necessarily being the the best strategy.
    --

    "Rub her feet." -- L.L.

  115. Re:Junk mail subsidizes first class mail by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    Your nothing but a troll.

    Trays of mail presorted mail eliminate any sorting from being done in the originating post office, and eliminates at least two sorting runs in the distribution centers.

    Since you are an idiot, I'm sure that the thought that it is cheaper to handle a pallet of bundled, presorted by zip+4 magazines never crossed your mind?

    Did you know that in large post offices the special magazine rates lowered the time to sort mail into delivery routes by 8%? That 8% adds up to millions of dollars, and is a good example of how the post office as a whole has cut costs and made itself self-sufficient.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  116. You just gave me an idea.. by schon · · Score: 1

    Instead of "good" porn.. what about something disgusting?

    I think we've finally discovered a use for that goatsecx link that keeps poppin up here! :o)

  117. non existent persons by hawk · · Score: 2

    there are, of course, the usual tales about pre-approval of pets, and at non-existent addresses entered by clerical error, etc.

    But my favorite of all time is from the late 80's. I'd just set up my practice (which is why I can place it), and was talking to my grandmother. She was living in the house she was born in, and received a letter addressed to her father. Seems he was pre-approved for a gold card due to his excellent credit--never mind that he'd been dead for over half a century . . .

    now how in the world did *that* one get into the system??? 19th century birth records? death certificates? 1920's electrical bills? oh, wait, the house would have still been gas at that point . . . :)

    1. Re:non existent persons by hawk · · Score: 2


      But his death preceded the entry of such information into databases . . . He and my grandmother were in their 20's, I believe, when they built theplace after the earthquake.

      But it changed hands, probably twice--I assume that it passed to his widow, and it was purchased from my great-grandmother's estate by my grandmother and grandfather . . .

    2. Re:non existent persons by Tuzanor · · Score: 1

      well it depends, if he was born in 1865 and you got this in say 1985, the year at that time for his birth probably would have been just 65. SO they though he was a young 20 year old. and it's possible since the house kept in the family that the official ownership never changed and that the property was in his name.

  118. That won't work.. by schon · · Score: 1

    That won't work..

    Mail servers (even old ones, my experience only goes back to Sendmail 8.6, but IIRC it went back to V5.. it's probably in RFC 822/821 as well, but I'm too lazy to check) count the Received: headers on an email.. when the count passes a certain threshold (typically 25, but frequently much lower) the mail gets returned to the sender, (or to the postmaster if undeliverable.)

    You might bump the load for the mailservers a little for a minute or so, but that's about it.

  119. Re:Junk mail subsidizes first class mail by phantomlord · · Score: 2

    Let me also recommend Citizens Against Government Waste's report on the US Post Office's financial indescretions

    --
    Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
  120. ironic yes, justice no, needed probably by corbettw · · Score: 1

    While I don't like the idea of any ISP (even UUNET or one of it's subs) getting hit this hard by spam, it'll take just this level of interuption of service before companies like UUNET start taking spam seriously. If a significant number (>5%) of the million customers affected by this cancelled their accounts, or even just demanded free service for a month or two, that would be just the right incentive for Pipex/UUNET to go after the originators of this spam full bore. Once they've done that once, their legal and security departments should be more able/willing to go after others in the future.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  121. ROI? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    What is the return on investment of these spamming companies? Are there really enough people buying their products to make it worth the spammers' while? The stupidest ones (possibly the second most profitable ones) are the messages that advertise spamming services. I can understand someone clicking through porn spam, but I can't understand anyone clicking through pseudo-Viagra spam.

    Whatever happened to 'targetted advertising'?

    Dancin Santa

    1. Re:ROI? by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

      Very high - look at those godawful infomercials - those cost $3k to $5k for EVERY run - how many widgets do they have to sell to break even? In one case (i used to work in tv) the same infomercial would run every night at the same time 7 days a week - at least $20k - thats 2000 suckers a week at 99.95 - this went on for months - how many losers need $100 widgets? And this is for just one channel - there are how many channels? You can be sure these people wouldn't spend this kind of money unless they were making even more.

      I know i've posted this comment before, but the bottom line is the stuff works.

      -

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
    2. Re:ROI? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't take any time at all for them. Email lists with millions of Email addresses are sold regularly over the net. I know because a few of the pieces of spam i get are advertising thier lists. These lists are jsut imported into the spam program, the user types up a short (or long) message and clicks the "Spam people NOW!" button, then goes off to watch tv. It takes them maby 15-30 minuites at the most. Even if 5 people are interested, out of millions they managed to make some money.

    3. Re:ROI? by pjrc · · Score: 2
      According to this slashdot story of about two weeks ago, 12000 (of 50 million) people were stupid enough to send £24 to these crooks for a job stuffing envelopes at home (presumably to Get Rich Quick).

      Maybe someone ought to get a gaint list of these sucker's email addresses and spam them with messages saying "all these spam emails are scams, don't send a single penny and don't click their links, because idiots who get taken keep these slimballs in business".

    4. Re:ROI? by NonSequor · · Score: 1
      Maybe someone ought to get a giant list of these sucker's email addresses and spam them with messages saying "Send us money, we'll give you candy."


      "Homo sum: humani nil a me alienum puto"
      (I am a man: nothing human is alien to me)

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    5. Re:ROI? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone ought to get a gaint list of these sucker's email addresses and spam them with messages saying "all these spam emails are scams, don't send a single penny and don't click their links, because idiots who get taken keep these slimballs in business".

      That wouldn't be too hard, I get spam selling those lists all the time!

      AMAZING OPPORTUNITY

      Dear Consumer,

      Have you had it up to here with unsolicited email (spam)? You have been emailed because you are on a list of potential spammees. Most of you are aware that spam contains no redeeming value and the products pushed in them frequently turn out to be scams. The problem is that some of you are still clicking through the links in these emails. If every one of you made a conscious effort to *NOT* respond in any way to these annoying emails, they *will* eventually stop.

      This is not a task that can be done alone! Recruit your friends and neighbors by sending them this email. In all likelihood, they have already received this, but send it to them anyway. Also forward this to any web-enabled idiots that you may know. These are probably the people keeping spam alive on the net.

      Thank you for your cooperation,

      Dancin Santa

  122. Fun with postage paid envelopes by kodesmith · · Score: 1

    One should also place the rest of the contents of their junk mail(including the envelope) into the postage paid envelope before you mail it.

  123. SpamServer games by scoleman · · Score: 1

    I once worked for an organization where I learned of a "feature" with SMTP servers, which can allow for unbounded replication of a single email. Without giving out too many of the details, if the organization has both internal and external SMTP servers, a properly formatted email can replicate out of control. The trick was to play the two servers against one another by creating an email with multiple recipients all of which are within the same organization but are undeliverable. Each time the email is returned and forwarded it will be replicated. 2,4,8,16,32,.. you get the idea? I believe that Pipex stumbled across this same "feature" by indiscriminately sending to addresses that were scoured off the web. I wonder where I should put my latest email addresses on the web so Pipex can find it? ;->

  124. Help me stop spam. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    I'm having trouble figuring out sendmail's spam filters. Are there any resources I can read that will explain how to stop spam with sendmail?

    Hundreds of messages with the X-Authentication-Warning flag are passing through my server every day.

    Are there any linux gurus out there willing to help me figure out the sendmail spam filters?

    If so, e-mail me: mkaatman@mail.win.org

    Thanks!
    Matt

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Help me stop spam. by QuMa · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of 'the appropriate channels'? Try usenet, or doing a web search for one of the many documents describing how to do this.

    2. Re:Help me stop spam. by corbettw · · Score: 1
      Try looking through the Sendmail website first, then asking for help.

      Also, pick up a copy of the bat book.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    3. Re:Help me stop spam. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

      I have looked through sendmails site.
      I've read it and re-read and I can't seem to figure out how to do what I want to do.

      I also am a bit confused by some of the file names and locations in SuSE 7.

      It seems that instead of sendmail.cf and sendmail.mc, SuSE uses linux.cf and linux.mc but I don't know how to check before.

      I'm not exactly a newbie but I'm not a linux immortal either.

      I just made the move from using Exchange to sendmail and it has helped a ton. Most of the setup hasn't been a problem but I am stuck on blocking spam other than using the access.db file.

      I will check out the bat book but what I really need is someone with some experience who is willing to give me a hand. I wouldn't mind hiring someone to teach me either.

      --
      The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    4. Re:Help me stop spam. by bbh · · Score: 1

      There are a number of features in sendmail to close open relays. check out the links below to get you started on it.

      Allowing Controlled SMTP relaying in Sendmail 8.9
      Relaying Denied/Allowed (in sendmail 8.8/8.9-8.11)

    5. Re:Help me stop spam. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding me. I've tried both ask.com and google to find ways to shut this down and I can't find anything relevant.

      I've tried searching for "sendmail spam filters" and "X-Authentication-Warning".

      Maybe I'm searching for the wrong phrases?

      --
      The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  125. Re:Don't just send them empty! by sharkey · · Score: 1

    I am in the process of reviewing other fax products. RightFAX and VSI are at the top of my list right now. As a bonus, VSI will run on Linux, which I would prefer over NT.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  126. Junk mail subsidizes first class mail by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 1

    So all the junk mail I get doesn't bother, because it keeps my mailing rates down (and I mail a lot of music CD's out).

    If you eliminated junk mail, we might be paying $0.50 a letter and $0.40 each additional ounce, which would nearly double my postage bill.

    Plus, all the junk mail we get helps me explain why we keep getting those Adam & Eve catalogs to the honey, "Well, we must be on some list somewhere. Say, look, French Ticklers!"

    1. Re:Junk mail subsidizes first class mail by Rader · · Score: 2
      I'm probably an idiot, but i'm not a troll.

      You on the other hand, must work for the government, or on crack if you say "Self-sufficient" "Cut costs" and "Post office" in the same sentence.

      There are 10 times the number of small post offices compared to large post offices. Only the entry point of large periodicals start at large BMC's.

      No one argues that pre-sorted mail is faster and cheaper to sort than non-sorted mail. Einstein! But the money saved from the automation process decreases every year as the technology margin narrows, while the cost of processing non-sorted mail increases, due to human labor, increases mail weight, etc. Your logic is similar to a car race...where you say you're gaining on this guy 10% faster, because you're driving 55mph instead of 50mph, but he's still going 70mph.
      I don't "SAVE 10%" of my money when I buy a bag of chips that says "10% more FREE!" when the weight is the same and the cost is the same from the day before.

      This supposed 8% report you made up is just one-sided numbers. They don't take these "million$ saved" and subsidize the 1st-class stamp...it goes back into the system to purchase more automation machines, build new Bulk Mail Centers, new semis for transport, more carriers to handle the increase in mail. Unfortunately it is impossible to draw the line where costs are afflicted, so an increase in new mail carriers might get attributed to 1st-class, so maybe the stamp has to be raised a penny.

      Well over 1/2 my mail is junk mail. If I'm a typical John Doe, then multiply that out. You're trying to say that this increase in all our junk mail has somehow saved them money over-all just because it was presorted?

      You are correct, pallets of bundled, zip+4 magazines never crossed my mind, since all mail qualifying for automation have 11-digit delivery point zip codes.

    2. Re:Junk mail subsidizes first class mail by pantyraider · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but think of the amount of paper that is wasted each year by spam. It's ridiculous.

  127. Re:Don't just send them empty! by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Or how about just stuffing them with tidbits of garbage? Then you don't have to take out your trash as often ;)

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  128. Credit card/solicitation calls by Hurricane_Bill · · Score: 1
    Anybody else notice that a credit card solicitor will *not* hang up the phone no matter how many times you say your not interested.

    What I've started doing is telling them 2x that I'm not interested, and then I put the phone down off the hook so that they are talking to nobody!

    This amuses me very much:)

    1. Re:Credit card/solicitation calls by Mr_Huber · · Score: 3
      I had heard this same line about "4 to 6 weeks". However, if you read through Junkbuster's site, you'll find this gem from Section L, subsection e 2 iii:

      Recording, disclosure of do-not-call requests:
      If a person or entity making a telephone solicitation (or on whose behalf a solicitation is made) receives a request from a residential telephone subscriber not to receive calls from that person or entity, the person or entity must record the request and place the subscriber's name and telephone number on the do-not-call list at the time the request is made.

      http://www.junkbusters.com/ht/en/fcc.html

      This seems to say that even if they have some processing to do, they are liable the instant you notify them. Try quoting this section to them and see how they respond.

    2. Re:Credit card/solicitation calls by annielaurie · · Score: 1

      Ah. You've got it somewhat wrong.

      What you do is take great pains to get their name, their supervisor's name, and any other information they care to give you. Then tell them that you are officially, formally requesting them not to call you any more, and that if they ever do, there's a $500 fine attached.

      I have no idea if that's true or not, but it certainly confuses them. And I think we get fewer of these calls since we've started doing it.

      --
      DUCT TAPE: The Election Supervisors' Secret Weapon
    3. Re:Credit card/solicitation calls by option8 · · Score: 2

      more effective, and especially troublesome and tedious for them, is to a: request to be put on their DO NOT CALL LIST (say it in bold capital letters) and b: request WRITTEN CONFIRMATION that you have been put on the do not call list. compliance with both A and B is mandatory, and it takes whoever actually does the putting on the list and the written confirmation of such off the calling queue for the time necessary to fill out the forms.

      several times i have heard, however, that the update to the do not call list will take 4 to 6 weeks, and who knows how long it takes to get written confirmation...

  129. Re: 800 numbers by scotch · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but when you get your bill for your 800 number and notice it went through the roof, maybe you'll think twice about using SPAM as a marketing tool, and would refrain from hiring spammers in the future. No market, no problem.

    --
    XML causes global warming.
  130. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by clary · · Score: 1

    Actually, for its time, "an eye for an eye" was a step forward from the previous primitive standard of "kill the dude, kill his family, and for good measure, kick his dog."

    --

    "Rub her feet." -- L.L.

  131. the problem with that notion by hawk · · Score: 2

    is that it applies equally well to prostitution, selling crack, contract hits, etc.

    This "desparate person" is yharming other people to collect his minimum wage. That *does* make him a lousy person and a zit upon society's posterior.

  132. Getting Spamers back by GecKo21 · · Score: 1

    I put a little twist on sending those postage paid envelopes and have been doing it for years now. Take someone elses Junk Mail ads and stuff those back in the envelope. You know, something that is just specific to your town, pizza coupons, tanning special coupons, etc... Fun stuff

  133. gee, MORE spam from UUNet? by Barbarian · · Score: 2

    i[Pipex is owned by UUNET, and according to statistics compiled by spam fighting and tracking sites SpamCop and SpamHaus, more spam gets spewed through UUNET than from all the other Internet service providers combined]i

    Gee, could this be because of the size of UUNet and it's placement as a backbone provider?

    It's like saying, "According to a recent survey, AOL has more novice users than all other ISP's combined".

  134. Square envelopes by sulli · · Score: 1

    I've sent 5.5" square envelopes with no problem on a normal first class rate. Maybe larger ones are extra, but not that size.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  135. Re:If only everyone were like me.... by dman123 · · Score: 1
    My practice for years has been to simply set the phone down gently and let them talk on.

    Yes, yes, please do this. I consider it karma for all the times I do the same thing, because another side effect is that it cuts down on the total number of calls made, and that means that the chance of them getting around to calling me decreases.

    --
    dman123 forever!

    --

    --
    dman123 forever!
    Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
  136. Re:Other proven uses of post-paid envelopes and ca by WillSeattle · · Score: 2

    I guarantee, no North American tree is ever touched for the sole purpose of making paper. There are mountains of unused wood chips that can be used to produce paper. All byproducts of wood manufacture.

    I grew up in logging communities. Certain types of wood are only useful for paper production, so I don't know that I buy your statement. Kind of like when people keep saying logging at alpine levels will grow back - it's the topsoil destruction that makes it take 100 years for even partial regrowth. I know, I've logged at such heights. Used to spend my summers, as a boy, floating around Kootenay Lake (in Kaslo, B.C., Canada) on logs, which is really cool.

    However, you are correct that almost all trees are used for various purposes. I've made shakes and shingles from redwoods, used cottonwoods (wet buggers) for firewood (long drying period for those). A lot of B.C. trees are used for chopsticks, actually.

    But decreased demand is still decreased demand.

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  137. Tormenting telemarketers by Captain+Chad · · Score: 1
    An applicable joke from the rec.humor.funny archives is here.

    I wish it would work that way in real life.

    --
    Check out Chad's News
  138. Stupid and persistent by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2
    So I get a call from a spammer just now. He's looking for high-level
    email services, which I advertise on my home page, along with my phone
    number. He wants to make sure that I've got a reliable connection,
    because he keeps losing his Internet connection. I ask him why. He
    says that his Internet providers keep kicking him off, accusing him of
    spam. "But it's legal by federal law and by my state to send
    unsolicited advertising". I hang up on him.

    He's so stupid that he doesn't get it the first time. He calls back.
    I know it's him because I've got caller ID. I pick up the receiver
    and drop it.

    He's not only stupid, he's persistent. He calls back a third time,
    and I give him the finger again.

    Stupid spammers.

    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  139. My Hobby As Well by shagrat · · Score: 1

    I have been sending back empty envelopes for years now. It gives me great pleasure.

  140. Re:Don't just send them empty! by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Or maybe put fortune cookie fortunes in them...

    Man, I have to find a site to purchase those in bulk...

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  141. Fighting Spam with Spam by Code+Archeologist · · Score: 1

    While I am sure that this was probably just some knub-skull Spammer who sent 1,000 copies of the same mail to a list of 200,000 addresses. It still makes a point of what is going to be the only way to stop spammers. Legislation is all well and good but it takes time and in the end will only limit their abilities. What really needs to be done is a few more occurances like this to make "spam friendly" ISPs no longer accept such activity.

  142. get your correction right :) by hawk · · Score: 2

    It's Pournelle & Niven, not just Niven

  143. Great Idea by Gefiltefish · · Score: 1

    Sending back the postage-paid envelopes empty is a fabulous idea.

    Maybe even better would be to do a switch. Take one piece of return junk mail and put it in a different company's return postage-paid envelope. That way it's 30 cents plus 2 minutes for someone to figure out what the hell is going on.

  144. So do something positive (but annoying) by namespan · · Score: 3

    OK, so "taking it out" on the low guys isn't the best solution. Maybe telling them about anal sex or verbally abusing them isn't the answer.

    One Mormon guy I know starts telling telemarketers about his religious beliefs -- annoying, yes, but at worst he's annoying, and at best he can hope he's changing someone's life. So why not try evangelizing YOUR favorite cause, religion, book, band, or whatever you think might make the world a better place!

    TELEMARKETER: I'm calling to inform you about HomeSelect, a brand new program from MegaCard...
    YOU: That's great! You know, I have something I'm really excited about too -- have you ever used the open source text editor vim? I've been using things like BBEdit and CodeWrite for a while, but vim is amazing.

    (And now the question is, who will flame me first? People who don't like Mormonism? People who don't like vim? BBEdit Bigots? CodeWrite haters? I love slashdot! )

    --

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    1. Re:So do something positive (but annoying) by radja · · Score: 2

      I used to get called by isnurance salesmen. They're annoting. They're also easy to get rid of: they usually want to make an appointment to come round to talk it all over in person. fine with me, you can come round next thursday, 14:00. What I don't tell them is that I'm at work. They get the hint after standing in front of the same closed doors a few times, and you don't have to do anything.

      //rdj

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  145. Re:If only everyone were like me.... by TekkonKinkreet · · Score: 1

    What about:

    "Great, so I'll put you down for two abdominizers and one 'Super thighs in 30 days the Steve Jobs way'?"
    "Yes...OK..."
    "Great, I assume you'll want to use the address and credit card we have on file."
    "...OK...yes."
    "We also have the Jeff Bezos Power Diet Plan, boxed set, signed, for $49.95."
    "...I see...Yes...OK..."

  146. Software for combating telemarketers... by Ruger · · Score: 1

    ...can be found here. http://www.verinet.com/~geoff/Enigma/ You take control of the call and it causes them untold aggravation as you run through the questions. Ruger

  147. Re:Bounce-Mail: Return Post-paid Junkmail - Blank by Faulty+Dreamer · · Score: 1

    Three words, "lead fishing sinkers". They are small, heavy, and fit inside the envelope so that no one will just throw it away at the post office.

    I've heard that the brick idea doesn't get through a lot of the time and you are just wasting your effort. However, the lead sinkers will at least get to the company, and then they are actually billed for the shipping wieght.

    --

    ------------

  148. More ideas for junk mail envelope returns by vandelais · · Score: 1

    -As someone else said before me: Out of focus photographs or those ass-and balls-shots your uncle took of himself using the camera on the table at your family's most recent wedding reception - Change, especially Canadian. (Costing more in postage than it's worth) -Tampons, used or other bathroom products such as q-tips, dental floss, kleenex, etc. -Guppies, with a note attatched "Hope you received this in time!" :)) -Or best/worst of all--a chunk of Lutefisk. -FIRE ants,,,,FIRE, FIRE -Those goddamn stinky magazine perfume/cologne inserts especially in Sports Illustrated -those AOL disks -ash tray remains -CHILI powder (with a picture of Flea, signed 'With Love') -Those 20 oz pop bottle lids that say "Please Try Again" -Pubes! Thank you.

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
  149. OT - Re:Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 1
    Karma karma karma karma karmeleon: it comes and goes, it comes and goes. --Boy George

    Is it considered a glitch in the Matrix if my WinAmp playlist (2700 entries) shuffled to this song while I was reading your comment?

    Seriously, it just happened.

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    1. Re:OT - Re:Jeovah (was Re:Remember...) by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Spooky. But, it must be a sign!

      Just like the dweeb that moderated me down as "overrated", just because I have +1 bonus due to my so-far-so-good karma. I interpret this as being time to start using the "No Score" check box (like now).

      Karma karma karma karma karmeleon: it comes and goes, it comes and goes.

  150. Re:What about junk/advert. flyers? by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

    In The Netherlands we have freely available stickers to put on your mailbox, to indicate if you want flyers or free local newspapers. IIRC, the delivery people are legally required to respect those stickers. Otherwise their employer can be fined.

    If only this were true for spam...

  151. Telemarketing Rules in Canada by mj · · Score: 1

    The Canadian Rules are quite similar to those posted for the US
    (at JunkBusters.com)

    The Canadian rules can be found in this article at
    the CRTC
    I didn't dig too deep, but I expect, given this document, that there may be even tougher laws coming soon!

  152. Re:Could be, but is it? by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

    I usually get 5 or 6 spams a day from uu.net. I now send all uu.net spam to sales@uu.net and info@uu.net - they have begun to get annoyed, judging from the complaints i am beginning to get from the sales scum. I told them i'd stop forwarding their spam back to them when started cancelling their pink contracts. I'm starting to see a decrease in uu.net spam. I recommend that EVERYONE send all uu.net originated spam back to the sales people allowing all these spammers on the net. Anyone who has submitted an abuse complaint to them I'm sure is aware that it is falling of deaf ears. Send the complaint to some live ones...

    --
    The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  153. Postage-paid envelopes have surcharges by crow · · Score: 2

    A first class stamp may be only $.34, but the business is charged an additional per-item fee. This can vary from $.35 down to only $.01, depending on volume. Hence, if it's a small organization, you're really sticking it to them, but for bulk mailers, it's not as big a deal.

    (This was verified at www.usps.gov)

    1. Re:Postage-paid envelopes have surcharges by Speare · · Score: 2

      The point isn't the enforcability... but since when has that stopped spammers from assuming that they could get away with anything?

      They'd just look at the conversion rate; "hm, 0.1% of them didn't fight it, they just bought the thing anyway. It's worth it."

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Postage-paid envelopes have surcharges by Speare · · Score: 2

      While I thought the approach was funny, in this age of technology, you may get bitten...

      All they have to do is print the bre's (business reply envelopes) with encoded information about who gets which envelope.

      • "Mr. Taco. We are so happy you expressed interest in our services by returning the postage-paid flier. According to the slip of paper that was sent along with that envelope, '
      • By returning the postage-paid response envelope, you agree to the paid services listed below.' We have sent the first invoice with this notice, and are pleased to let you know that there are only four more payments of US$99.00 due within the next six months. Again, thanks for ordering our services, Mr. Taco."

      Just what we need... another generation of spam darwinism.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  154. Re:spammers by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

    Im not new here, and I do know about all the typos that end up in headlines. But it doesn't really affect me, I know what he is trying to say, you know what he is trying to say, 99.99% of people most likely know what he is saying. I just don't understand why people get all hyper about it. Your right, you do have the right to post any way you want, but I just thought that if you feel so strongly about him being a "pretensious asshole" that you minght get more credibility if you were accountable for what you said. Another question, what's with all the cussing? I know it's your right to do thats well.. but whats the point? ohh well, have a nice night.

  155. How to take care of all bulk mail: by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

    If you get, say, three credit card applications in a day, send two back to the third company. Keeps them guessing :D
    --------

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  156. Other proven uses of post-paid envelopes and cards by WillSeattle · · Score: 5

    About a decade ago myself and a few friends decided to take action to increase the demand side of the economic equation for recycled paper. At the time, supply of post-consumer recycled paper was about three times larger than demand.

    What we did was go to all the libraries and workplaces we could, gather all the postage-paid subscription cards, and write various different economic messages, asking the magazines and software companies to use recycled paper for some of their material. For software companies, it was the manuals; for magazines it was just the insert cards (paper plants to produce clay-content magazine picture quality paper did not exist in North America at the time).

    One of the reasons it worked was we had a limited targetted message asking for something that was not only acheivable, but was cheaper too.

    For some of these we made stamps to stamp all the cards. Then when our group had collected a few thousand of the cards, we'd send off bundles of 100 or so in different mailboxes throughout the city. For a period of five to ten days. Which meant that thousands of these postage-paid cards would flood the target for weeks on end, from various places, and various people, all at the cost of the magazine which published them.

    As a result, a number of positive things happened. Magazines started to send only three or four of those post-paid insert cards in the magazine (before we'd get 20-30 per issue, which kept falling out). They started using recycled paper for the inserts, and sometimes even the magazine (e.g. Science News). And software manuals started being printed on recycled paper.

    And since demand for recycled paper increased ten-fold, new non-chlorine recycled paper plants were built in the US and Canada, saving untold forests from being logged.

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  157. Re:Don't just send them empty! by suwain_2 · · Score: 1
    Visa keeps bugging me about sending them stuff, and it really annoys me.

    I finally filled an envelope with a bunch of coins and 30 cents Canadian, telling them that they had won an "All expenses paid" vacation to Canada, with a little footnote saying "In the unlikely event that you incur more than 30 cents of costs, you are responsible for paying the remainder." I also added one stipulation -- they had to throw whatever lists they had with my name over the waterfall at Niagra Falls.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  158. Better Yet.... by pivot_enabled · · Score: 1

    Take all of the junk mail you receive on a given day. Stuff it into any postage paid junk mail envelope you receive. They actually quit sending you crap after a surprisingly short period of time. Enjoy.

  159. 0.30 wasted.. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers. Empty. Eat that! 30 cents out of your pocket

    Wait wait - Ive dont the same thing.. many times (after I had my name 'listed' to be removed from the Canadian Direct Marketers Association list.. lost the info on how to do this, but im sure it is around.)

    What you HAVE to do is just tape your envelope to a brick, or a 12" log, or a shoebox filled with sand, or some other very HEAVY things - why waste only 0.30 of their dollars when you can waste MUCH more...

  160. Think of all the money lost.... by pjrc · · Score: 2

    ....by all those receipients who won't be able to Get Rich Quick until next week.

  161. I propose to Ashcroft that we create an ASDS by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 2

    Anti-Spam-Defense-Shield.

    I wonder if all those rolling blackouts in CA will have any effect on the quantify of spam I receive via e-mail.

    And, I like the idea of sending back the prepaid mailers attached to something heavy. Most of that type of mail goes unopened in my house anyway...never thought to send it back at them.

    To deal with telemarketers, you can tell them to put you on their no-call list. They typically have sixty days to get you off their lists. After that, you can sue them AND collect $500 per call (I think that's right). Just document the calls and build an audit trail.

    Finally, if you have caller ID, if it says unavailable or private, then take that to mean your status as well. If its important, they'll leave a message.

    RD

    1. Re:I propose to Ashcroft that we create an ASDS by Peyna · · Score: 1

      To deal with telemarketers, you can tell them to put you on their no-call list. They typically have sixty days to get you off their lists. After that, you can sue them AND collect $500 per call (I think that's right). Just document the calls and build an audit trail.

      Yeah, that works. If you have the time to waste pursuing all of them, and then, after you pay court/lawyer fees, etc. and wasted all of your time, hanging up would have been alot easier.

      --
      What?
  162. How to track spam: by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

    If you get spam that is from an addy that isn't in decimal and or alphabet form, then it is likely a website pointed to by a URL not in base 10. Sometimes spammers code their URLs into hexadecimal or octal so they can't be traced. Use http://x42.com/active/ip32.mpl or an equivilent to find the real domain it came from.
    --------

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  163. Doesn't work by anxious · · Score: 1

    The post office will not deliver postage-paid envelopes that are clearly being abused. Read this article from The Straight Dope

    1. Re:Doesn't work by baptiste · · Score: 1
      From your link:

      "Incidentally, Win, of the 161,000 people who wrote to the DMA last year, 116,000 wanted more junk mail. They were sent a booklet entitled "How To Get More Interesting Mail" (as God is my witness, I am not making this up), which tells you various key catalogs that you can send for to guarantee you'll be deluged with stuff. Just in case you have a change of heart."

      I can't believe that - unreal! No wonder direct mail firms think junk mail is the only way to attract business!

  164. If only everyone were like me.... by TekkonKinkreet · · Score: 4

    My practice for years has been to simply set the phone down gently and let them talk on. Occasionally, if I walk by the phone a few minutes later and they're still talking, I'll pick up the receiver and say "Go on," or, "I'm sorry, I didn't catch that last part, could you go over that again," and set the phone back down. Sometimes they catch on quickly, of course, but some callers will go through their entire script without noticing I'm not there.

    The point is not to piss off the telemarketer, that's just fortuitous. The point is to take up as much time on a fruitless call as possible.

    Telemarketers' business models depend on their getting through the negative calls in as little time as possible. That is, they *depend* on us snarling and hanging up on them. If instead, the custom were to chat with them indefinitely, the business would become unprofitable, because they couldn't cycle through the negative calls quickly enough to get to a profitable margin of positives. In a polite society, telemarketing doesn't work.

    1. Re:If only everyone were like me.... by Glanz · · Score: 1

      Don't knock it..., that Power Diet really works. And my dog just loves to chew on the abdominizers. And last but not least, I've got an unlisted number, am not in any phone books, and don't have a credit card. It would be a very lonely life if it wasn't for Debian (Both the dog & the kernel), all those automatically dialed incoming calls, and your enlightening message.

      --
      Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
    2. Re:If only everyone were like me.... by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I did this for a while, but then you have your own phoneline busy for the time it takes them to figure out you are not there(no surfing meanwhile). One thing that got my number blocked from telemarketers as "lost case" was first talking them for a minute then saying that you were busy and asked for their number so that you could call them back. Usually the answer was like
      Them:"Sorry, can't do that".
      Me:"Why not?"
      Them:"We don't want to be disturbed on our home numbers"
      Me:"That's amazing, neither do I!"

      Finally they realised that I was playing with them and didn't want to be diturbed anymore.
      It appears that they do have list of bad customers witch they wan't be calling and was lucky enough to get into one.

    3. Re:If only everyone were like me.... by Glanz · · Score: 1

      I've got this automatic answering thingy that lets me choose which message to play to the caller. If I know it's a telemarketing firm I play the "Yes...OK....yes......OK...I see..yes.....OK" message which lasts a full five minutes. When I'm downloading I play the "Bienvenu à l'Ambassade polonaise à Paris" so they think they somehow called Paris by mistake.

      --
      Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  165. Re:Awesome link! by thogard · · Score: 1

    I'm currently in Australia and it looks like the US post office has a 9 digit zip code for Melbourne. Anyone want to play with the post office to verify this theory? On a side note, at Christmas time, cards with US$.33 in postage got here 3 to 5 days faster than cards with the correct postage.

  166. Re:Nice way to screw the jumk mailers by sulli · · Score: 2

    Junk mailers have automatic envelope-opening machines. Post office doesn't. This machine opens the envelopes and gets sparkled. Unless you fill the envelope too tightly it probably won't jam the mail sorters, which are designed to handle envelopes full of tax forms and the like.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  167. First Spam! by n6kuy · · Score: 1

    ... maybe...

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  168. Re:Pre-paid envelopes? by Rader · · Score: 2
    I don't remember that exact stats, but postage paid envelopes have 4 times the chance of being responded to than non-paid envelopes.

    Rader

  169. Re:Don't just send them empty! by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    When I get spam (electronic junk mail?), I reply to it with some bizarre message. Someone sent me some weight loss offer, and I replied, putting thing like "munch munch" in between phrases... I realize few people will even see it, but it amuses me to no end...

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  170. Re:Don't respond! by dorward · · Score: 1

    Indeed. A good bet is to:

    a) use an email client that gives easy access to mail headers like mutt (you can get to them in {shiver} Outlook but it isn't as easy

    b) Pay a visit to http://www.spamcop.net/ and run the mail through their service. SpamCop will check the ip addresses and compose emails to relevent abuse addresses for you.

  171. Re:ineffective by Rader · · Score: 2
    Wrong.
    Magazines don't have 6 pre-paid postals in each magazine...at 500,000 to 1,000,000 magazines ---already paid for. That would be a ridiculous cost of something that only gets less than 1% used. (or whatever the stat is) They could give the magazine away at that cost!!!!!!!!

    Yes, they pay to get an account, pay an annual or per-issuance cost, meet a minimum, and THEN pay for each USED one. It's all barcoded to their account or OCR'd, and tracked that way. Pre-paid postcards or envelopes must follow VERY strict guidelines ranging from size, paper, and positioning to make sure they are completely usable through the automative process.

    Rader

  172. Re:Don't just send them empty! by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    I've heard of, but never witnessed, people wrapping a brick in paper and taping the reply envelope to it.

    This is probably illegal, and I don't recommend you do it.

    -

  173. Abbie Hoffman came up with it first by inaneboy · · Score: 1

    From Abbie Hoffman's "Steal This Book"
    "Those ridiculous free introductory or subscription type letters that you get in the mail often have a postage-guaranteed return postcard for your convenience. The next one you get, paste it on a brick and drop it in the mailbox. The company is required by law to pay the postage. You can also get rid of all your garbage this way."

  174. Retaliation spam by Isawa · · Score: 1

    My old job had a help desk address that sent a confirmation email automatically whenever it recieved an email. It also got about 7 spam messages a night. One night the server somehow got screwed up and was sending the reply email about once a minute. This continued for about 10 hours. Heh, and they thought they knew what spam was.

  175. Carpet cleaning? Cool! There's blood everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Caller: "Hello sir, would you like to have your carpets cleaned for only $49.95?"

    Me: "Wow man, you called just tin time. You gotta help me. There's BLOOD EVERYWHERE. Can you get blood out? Aw man! And I need it done ASAP, before the cops get here!"

    Caller: (*click*)

  176. took me a min by onShore_Jake · · Score: 1

    I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers. Heh...
    took me a minute. Postage-paid you umean.

  177. "Hackers Caused This?" by d00f · · Score: 1

    This has to be the craziest thing I've ever seen misreported. I happen to work for a Canadian web email firm. This whole issue was reported as though a mysterious "hacker" crashed their email system. Hardly so.

    The email in question was sent in a number of ways. They relayed copius amounts through the ISP's own mail servers and others they sent directly to the sources and others still were using a RBL relay.

    The spam attack was merely a name guessing attack which 90% of their dictionary generated emails did not go anywhere anyway. The RBL relayed email was blocked automatically. The directly sent email was sent to the bit-bucket. The spam coming from their mail servers was entered into the postfix configuration and the connections got a spam refused SMTP error.

    So that would explain why their mail queues got filled up. Not our problem. Not the result of any "hackers". Just the result of a closely monitored email system with good anti-spam countermeasures.

  178. never send them empty, rather: by rootrot · · Score: 1

    increase the weight and annoyance of them. I have for years returned any envelopes full of twigs, rocks and, to certain tediously conservative outfits, decaying biomass...

    I've a close friend who has used this method to dispose of all his old socks and underwear for the last several years...

  179. Helpful Checklist by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

    1) Make sure it is junkmail.
    The company I work for sends out large, somewhat plain, letters on behalf of people's employers. People aren't specifically expecting a letter from XX corp and assume it's junkmail. We get this empty return trick sometimes, often with some funny profanity on the envelope.

    2) Don't put anything in the envelope.
    Sometimes, people put junkmail inside our return envelopes. They think it will increase the postage bill, but I think the return is a flat rate (I don't know, I'm not in the mail room). The thing is that every once in a while people accidentally send us credit card applications and/or statements. One woman sent us some private insurance documents. Less trustworthy people might do bad things with these.

    Just trying to help

    -B

  180. What about junk/advert. flyers? by Hurricane_Bill · · Score: 1
    I had a battle with the post office about 1yr ago. I put a sign on my mailbox like 'no junk mail', 'no solicition'... but it turns out that the post office is *required* to deliver this mail although I do have the option to 'return to sender'. This is fine for credit card type solicitation that comes in an envelope.

    BUT, what about flyers such as supermarket ad's... Anybody find a way that I can Send these back as well? This junk upsets me so much more than spam email (which at least I can filter).

  181. Re:whoa by Root+Down · · Score: 1

    This mail only has four assholes! Completely useless in trying to engineer a five-assholed monkey! Besides, if you really wanted to be that which you claim of Cmdr Taco, you'd have made a script to SPAM this posting - in a twist of real irony requiring (at most) moderate intelligence. Suck suck suck. ROOT DOWN ~#

  182. Fax spam by Saib0t · · Score: 1

    I've been bothered by a lot of faxes at home recently. The problem is that I'm using my phone line for both telephone and fax, so what happens is that the phone rings in the middle of the night, I have to go downstairs, take the phone only to find out that it's some stupid advertisement.

    sending back emtpy (or heavily loaded) prepaid letters back to the sender might be a good thing, but how to get rid of the fax spam?
    Ideas anyone?

    --

    One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
  183. Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by Chuck+Flynn · · Score: 2

    Why should we be happy when the spammers get spammed? Ponder this.

    Lex Talionis, the principle of an eye for an eye, is a morally bankrupt code of law we've been moving away from for the past few thousand years, thankfully. It can't deal with the complexities of the modern legal order, and it ignores all proper justifications for systems of punishment: rehabilitation, prophylaxis, etc. It makes an assertion of rigid judgment in an attempt to avoid judgment itself. We can't live in a world without judgment.

    Ask yourself this: should we rape the rapist? If not, why not? (Ignore for a moment that we essentially do rape rapists by committing them to so-called "maximum security" prisons where they get systematically brutalized and raped by guards and other inmates.) It's not a morally tenable position to lower ourselves to the level of brutes just so we can vindicate some idea of retribution.

    Therefore, ask yourself why we should be happy when the spammer gets spammed? No one should have to endure the pain and annoyance of spam: it's the scurge of the online world. Not even the spammer, who may be in his business because of factors outside his control like debt or bills for an illness in the family, etc. We should be outraged when anyone is spammed, and we should put the full force of the state and the law against the perpetrator no matter who the victim! Picking and choosing among which victims to protect is something the legal order of former barbaric times did. I'd be disgusted if our government returned to those days.

    Spam == bad. Victimization == bad. Why do people conflate the two? What kind of giddy moral superiority to you get from seeing anyone hurt?

    1. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by Guignol · · Score: 1

      Errrr.. so...
      we should rape the spammers ?
      oh.. we should spam the rapists ??
      :)
      Anyway, I somewhat agree with you about not raping the rapist.. it's actually not enough
      Oh well.. better not get into this anyway..
      I think I hate you for reminding me that rapists do exist while I was enjoying a nice, mostly funny discussion. Shouting so loud was so much necessary to get heard ?
      Guess that makes it a nice troll if I even got to answer...

    2. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by Shadowlion · · Score: 1

      We should be outraged when anyone is spammed, and we should put the full force of the state and the law against the perpetrator no matter who the victim!

      I think the more reasonable of us agree that nobody, not even spammers, deserve to get deluged under spam. And whoever did this should get prosecuted.

      However, having said that, this is certainly an ironic and amusing anecdote, and I think it cheers up a lot of people that spammers - perhaps among the most universally loathed people on the entire 'net - had a very succient object lesson as to why people don't like them very much.

      --

    3. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by bigdavex · · Score: 1
      Lex Talionis, the principle of an eye for an eye, is a morally bankrupt code of law we've been moving away from for the past few thousand years, thankfully. It can't deal with the complexities of the modern legal order, and it ignores all proper justifications for systems of punishment: rehabilitation, prophylaxis, etc. It makes an assertion of rigid judgment in an attempt to avoid judgment itself. We can't live in a world without judgment. Ask yourself this: should we rape the rapist? If not, why not?
      It's not like that at all. The outage isn't a punishment; it just happened due to their own policies. It's more like the rapist getting herpes.
      --
      -Dave
    4. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by grappler · · Score: 5

      dude, get some perspective. I've put in my share of hours deleting spam, but come on - comparing that to rape?

      We're in our cushy air conditioned offices working on computers and suddenly exacting retribution on a spammer is "brutish"? It's like a playful slap on the wrist, which will perhaps make them a little wiser.

      --
      Vidi, Vici, Veni
    5. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by lionrampant · · Score: 1

      I don't think he was comparing spam to rape. He was using rape as an example that would get your attention. His point is valid, though. Turnabout might be fair play, but it doesn't help us move beyond that sort of play and up to the next level, where we can really deal with the problem and find a solution to minimize/eliminate unwanted e-mail.

      --
      You can trust me. I'm with the government.
    6. Re:Lex Talionis is a morally bankrupt code by I+R+A+Aggie · · Score: 1
      Therefore, ask yourself why we should be happy when the spammer gets spammed? No one should have to endure the pain and annoyance of spam: it's the scurge of the online world.

      What? haven't you read your spam? don't you know that "spam is legal"? Why in the name of Cthulu should a spammer feel pain over a legal activity that s/h/it engages in???

      James

  184. Re:Don't just send them empty! by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    I worked for a place that did bulk emails with PP envelopes. One guy ticked that he couldn't get off the mailing list would fill the envelopes with old fishing weights and send back. We would have to pay for the excess postage per ounce.

  185. Re:Don't just send them empty! by swb · · Score: 1

    $ unstr /usr/share/games/fortune/fortunes

  186. Mail their own spam back to 'em by CDS · · Score: 1

    What I do is take all the pamplets, letters, credit card apps, etc. and shred it. I then stuff the shredded junkmail into their envelope and send it back to 'em...

    In the same token, whenever a website asks for an email address, I always use abuse@localhost or postmaster@localhost or root@localhost ... so they can spam their own abuse department :)

  187. Sending Postage-Paid mail back to Snail-Spammers by cheesewiz · · Score: 1

    A personal favorite. Pack the envelope full of dirt. Seal it at the post office with the nifty free tape. That costs them more than $0.30 and it makes a mess. Talk about givin em what they deserve...

  188. Re:Other proven uses of post-paid envelopes and ca by rark · · Score: 1

    (you don't have an email address posted, otherwise I would have sent this via email, 'cos it is quite offtopic)

    > What we did was go to all the libraries and
    > workplaces we could, gather all the postage-paid
    > subscription cards, and write various different
    > economic messages, asking the magazines and
    > software companies to use recycled paper for
    > some of their material. For software companies,
    > it was the manuals; for magazines it was just
    > the insert cards (paper plants to produce
    > clay-content magazine picture quality paper did
    > not exist in North America at the time).

    I am all sorts of impressed. That's a really good idea. Damn, I wish I'd seen your slashdot posts when I actually lived in seattle last year, you sound (from a number of your posts) like you'd be a really fascinating person to meet irl (I'm not saying this in a stalking sense, honest! I'm really quite harmless)

  189. Not only that... by devjoe · · Score: 1

    Not only is there a street road there, but there's an East and West street road. Hope this mile-long Yahoo Maps URL works.

  190. Tape a brick to it if you're really mad by TomatoMan · · Score: 1

    That was one of Abby Hoffman's neat tricks from Steal This Book. If it's postage paid, you can mail them a brick and the post office is required to deliver it (or was as of about 1968, unless the laws have changed), hitting them up for a lot more than $0.30. As he put it, "...this is also a great way to get rid of your garbage."

    TomatoMan

    --
    -- http://frobnosticate.com
  191. Re:K3wl!!! by willfe · · Score: 1

    Dude, it's been *ages* since I've seen a postage-paid envelope to send payments with. Those days are over, welcome to 2001 :)

    --
    Read my stuff.
  192. Damn junkmailers by Aquafina · · Score: 1

    What I used to do was stuff those envelopes with a bunch of confetti, then send it off to thos mf...

    And when I get those damn telemarketers calling me at inappropriate times, I just sit there, let them babble, then proceed to ask them really stupid questions, one after another, till they get really frustrated and hang up. Ha ha... Wasted those bastards as much time as possible.

    Also, am I the only one or have these damn telemarketers started using machines to do their dialing and check if anyone's home? Lately I keep getting those "hold on for an important message" after I pick up the phone and say "hello". Then 5 seconds later a damn telemarketer picks up and starts preaching their crap.

  193. Re:Don't just send them empty! by lemox · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say your wasting the USPS's resources. If anything, you're helping them out... don't think they'll let the junk mailer get out of it without paying.

    --

    "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

  194. Business reply mail cards from magazines, too by swb · · Score: 1

    Why they insist on giving me "SUBSCRIBE TO ME!!!" cards in magazines I'm already subscribed to, I'll never know, but I love to mail them back in, often with stickers attached.

    One summer I worked as a desk clerk in a dorm and there was an endless supply of time, business reply mail cards, and a black magic marker for writing "NO!" on each one. Musta mailed 10-20 per day for the summer.

  195. One of my all-time favorites by WinDoze · · Score: 2

    When a telemarketer calls...

    Me: What has a 1-inch dick and hangs down?

    Marketriod: Wha?

    Me: What has a 1-inch dick and hangs down?

    Marketroid: Uh... I dunno.

    Me: A vampire bat... get it?

    Marketroid: Uh... sure.

    Me: What has a 10-inch dick and hangs up?

    Marketroid: Wha?

    Me: What has a 10-inch dick and hangs up?

    Marketroid: Uh... I dunno.

    Me: (CLICK!)

  196. Spam revenge by blair1q · · Score: 3

    Time was, people would take the blow-in cards from their magazines and avail themselves of the Business Reply Mail system by taping them to bricks, on the presumption that snail-mail charged by the pound for BRM. It was also popular to do this to the ubiquitous American Express applications.

    Did it work? Maybe. The Annals of Improbable Research (www.improb.com), formerly the Journal of Irreproducible Results (URL to hijacked IP denigrated), published a study in which they had mailed odd and bulky items with correct postage and addresses. The USPS seems to have been imperfectly willing to maintain their unflappable image (what unflappable image!), so not everything got to where it was supposed to.

    --Blair
    "The bison's in the mail."

  197. Pre-paid envelopes? by glowingspleen · · Score: 2

    I used to mail those in blank for awhile too, but then I slacked off about it. When I read the little side joke on it today though, it got me thinking. Not trying to karma whore here, but I'm curious to see what people think on this one.

    Is mailing back pre-paid envelopes a GOOD idea, in the long run?

    At first I would say yes, sure it is. It takes away cash from them. But then I realized that it will never BANKRUPT a company. It will only force them to take away the pre-paid part of the spam. Here's some bullet points to simplify your responces:

    1) How many people are REALLY persuaded just by the fact that it is prepaid? IE do you really think that the fools that send away for bogus junk and lousy magazines are thinking "Hey, I should get that, but it requires a stamp...oh wait, postage is free? Sign me up!"

    2) For bad postal spam: All they will do is convert to non-prepaid envelopes in the next mailing. We still have to get it, groan, and throw it away. No time saved.

    3) For GOOD postal spam: Yes, there are rare times when being on a techie mailing list means that you actually get some spam mail for something you really want/need/enjoy. It's rare, but if our policy was to mail these prepaid envelopes in blank, aren't we only hurting ourselves in that we semi-force those companies to change to non-prepaid mailers to save money? Yeah, it's 34 cents and no big deal, but why hurt good guys?

    Just some random spam from my thought mailbox...

  198. Phone Spam by ellem · · Score: 2

    --I have this cat, named Cat, who makes a meow that sounds like heh-row. Anylou, I put the phone next to the cat, or on her and after a few minutes she starts, "Heh-row, heh-row," into the phone. Must drive them insane.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  199. First class doesn't subsidize junk mail! by concept14 · · Score: 1
    However, in the US the junk mailers get a better rate than everyone else since the 1st class mail subsidizes the junk mail.

    Wrong, wring, wrong! The USPS is required by law to recover the costs for each class of mail from the postage rates for that class.

    The reasons bulk mail costs less are:

    • The mailer does a lot of the work beforehand by presorting, applying barcodes, facing all the envelopes in a bundle the same way, using permit imprints rather than postage stamps that have to be canceled.
    • Bulk mail doens't get free forwarding or return service like first clas mail does.
    • There is no service standard for bulk mail like there is for first class (X% to be delivered within Y days, and so on).
    --
    Quis metamoderunt ipses metamoderatores?
  200. SPAM exists because... by Glanz · · Score: 1

    ...people are not only stupid enough to open unsollicited mail, but theyattempt to read it too (which must be very difficult if the spam in question doesn't contain "pictures"). These same image-oriented idiots actually send real $$$ and credit card #s to the sources to obtain tangerine-colored rhine-stone broaches, edible underware (instead of software), battery operated tummy-tuners, scathological porn, nazi insignia, and plane tickets to non-existant Florida vacation spots. Maybe one is born every minute, but I'm sure one doesn't die every minute. None of these people use freeBSD, Linux, or any of the other "esoteric" operating systems. They find the time to read all that mail between the editing of their baby films for the family and posting cute little ready-made throbbing heart.gifs on lonely hearts message boards. They love Windows Me. They love vacuum cleaner shaped, transparent plastic, candy-colored Mac desk tops and toaster-like CDrom readers. A final thought:until some genius of a geek hacker finds a way to delete the veritable and not just the virtual presence of these credulous illiterates from the universe via the WWW, we will just have to put up with more and more SPAM for breakfast.

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  201. Re: 800 numbers by heytal · · Score: 1
    Nope.. I'm not talking about the way 800 numbers work.. I'm talking about spammers putting 800 numbers in their spam mails. Remember, it's not that the spammers that own the 800 number, spammers are just contractors, nothing else.

    Consider a scenario: I get a new 800 number, I contact a spammmer and ask him to spam with my new 800 number in it, and agree to pay him some amount on every call that i receive.

    So isn't it that we benefit the spammer by calling the 800 number ?

    just a thought. eh..

  202. Re:More Revenge on Snail Mail Mpam by randomspaces · · Score: 1

    Another reason to stuff all the crap in the return envelope: The postal rate is determined by the weight of the envelope. I run their inserts through the shredder and put as much as the envelope will hold into it.

  203. Don't just send them empty! by xFoz · · Score: 5

    I've been doing this for years. Instead of empty I toss in some prizes. That way the person opening the letter will have something to talk about on their break. All kinds of things have found a new home this way:

    - Little plastic army men.
    - Out of focus photographs.
    - Change. (Costing more in postage than it's worth)
    - Lettuce.
    - A printed warning about the Goodtimes virus.

    1. Re:Don't just send them empty! by WowTIP · · Score: 1

      No no no! Not funny. The idea is to send them something bizarre, something that will make them scratch their heads in confusion (why the heck did someone send us this???), not something disgusting.

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    2. Re:Don't just send them empty! by 42acres · · Score: 1

      Why tape the postage paid envelope to a box containing about 40 pounds of rocks?

    3. Re:Don't just send them empty! by meldroc · · Score: 1

      I doubt that you'd get put in prison for that, but the post office will refuse to deliver it.

      I just wish it was legal to send letter bombs in those prepaid return envelopes, maybe that'll break them of their junk mail habits. ;)

      --

      Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
    4. Re:Don't just send them empty! by WowTIP · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you also tell the spammer that your email adresse is "active"... ;)

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    5. Re:Don't just send them empty! by pigpogm · · Score: 2

      I'm so glad i'm not the only one that's done this!

      I've sent tea bags, the bit of card from a plug with the wiring instructions on it (UK 13 amp) and the innards of a broken clock.

      I'm actually tempted now to start sending printed slips advertising my web site - let them pay for me to advertise my own site to their staff on their time.

      --
      PigPog.
    6. Re:Don't just send them empty! by richmaine · · Score: 1

      I send A's junk mail to B and vice versa.

  204. Dear UUNet by slutdot · · Score: 1

    To quote the immortal Nelson Muntz - HA HA!

  205. Loose Ads (Was Re: Empty) by Chris+Hiner · · Score: 1

    Unless the rules have changed in the last few years, you can request at the post office not to get the random resident junk mail...
    You'll still get anything specifically addressed to you, but the bulk "stick one of these in everyone's mailbox" stuff you won't have to deal with...

  206. Could be, but is it? by dubl-u · · Score: 2
    more spam gets spewed through UUNET than from all the other Internet service providers combined
    Gee, could this be because of the size of UUNet and it's placement as a backbone provider?

    This is doubtful. Sure, UUNET is big, but not that big. If I look at the hit logs from the (large, J.-Random-User-oriented) web sites that I have access to, spam from UUNET dialups is way out of proportion to the hits from them.

    And that doesn't explain why UUNET is also such a popular place to host spammer sites. The more likely explanation is that fighting spam isn't a priority for them. In spam-fighting circles, they're not known as "Spew-U-NET" for nothing.

    Go take a look at the stats at Spamcop or at Spamhaus and it's pretty obvious that some big vendors are much worse than others about spam.
  207. Part of the Problem by robbway · · Score: 2
    Is it just me, or does anyone else see the problem with spamming the spammers? You see, revenge feels great, but you justify their spam as legitimate business. Not only that, they recognize their effectiveness when they get any response.

    If you perceive a problem, don't be part of it, fix it. For now, use filters. Deleting an e-mail is much easier than recycling physical junk mail. Whatever you do, don't let them get ahold of another e-mail address.

    ----------------------

  208. Re:spamcop by jaa · · Score: 1
    So...

    you should have reported that to spamcop. The problem wasn't the spamcop software (it got the message to you, now didn't it). The problem was with the person who submitted non-spam as spam. Spamcop has rules against that. The person who submitted that non-spam broke those rules.

    And that's assuming that your customer didn't spam those people. Just because his website makes you push buttons to sign up doesn't mean he doesn't also augment his list with some non-opt-ins as well.

    --

    Never meant half of the things I said to you. So you know, there's a half that might be true - G. Phillips

  209. Re:spammers by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

    How does making a typo make him a " Pretentious asshole"? And if your going to insult someone at least have the guts to use your name.

  210. please bring back sword fighting! by scytale42 · · Score: 1

    who decided that it was a good idea to evolve past sword fighting? if the duel were still an accepted way to resolve conflicts i think the world would be a more pleasant place to live everyone would be more polite at the very least. how much junkmail do you think you'd be getting if someone had killed the CEO's of those companies who SPAM or send junkmail i'd guess none.

    junkmail and SPAM make my blood boil!

    --
    newbie has been railed by intel*[MS]*
  211. Re:Carpet cleaning? Cool! There's blood everywhere by billh · · Score: 2

    My brother's phone number was listed under someone else's name in the phone book, and the telemarketing calls were always for the wrong person. One day, I must have been in a bad mood when they called:

    "May I speak to Mrs. Smith, please?"

    "I'm sorry, she's dead. I just killed her."

    silence... "what???"

    "I've just killed her. She's lying on the floor right here."

    Turns out it was Circuit City of all places, and they must have thought I was serious. I got a call from the local police about 15 minutes later, and I could tell that the guy on the phone was trying very hard not to laugh...

  212. In a physical sense... by noz · · Score: 1

    ... this works nicely (ie. the postage-paid envelopes), but what if you were to electronically reply (if it were a valid address).

    Could you and your@address end up on blacklists?

  213. Empty Return Envelopes by WPIDalamar · · Score: 2

    I've gone a step better, I send thos business reply envelopes back with stuff in them!

    http://www.wpidalamar.com/fun/telemarketer

  214. spamcop by xrayspx · · Score: 2
    Spamcop is not accurate anything near 100% of the time. I got something like 10 spamcops one morning regarding a customer whose website we hosted, but who did their own mail through some other upstream provider somewhere. OUR upstream provider got a bunch also which he forwarded to me. Even still, I looked at the mail, looked at the site, and it wasn't even a matter of "opt out/opt in", the customer had to physically push buttons to "Please add me to your mailing list".

    Spam? Nope, they signed right up for it, took several STEPS in signing up for it. At any rate, point is, spamcop misses, that was one example, but I had this happen to me quite a few times.

    1. Re:spamcop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Faulty logic! The fact that the website had an opt-in function does *not* show that the emails people complained about weren't spam. Why shouldn't a spammer put an opt-in on their site and just claim that people opted-in, even if they didn't? I think SpamCop is excellent. The guy deserves a MacArthur grant IMHO. . . .

  215. Not empty, but... by glazik · · Score: 1
    .. I like to send those prepaid envelopes back with little surprises for the poor bastard at the other end. You know, a pretzel or two. Some peanut butter. It's sometimes fun to toss in a quickly rendered self-portrait or a note. I'm sure I'd *love* to get stuff like that if my job were so abhorrent. Break up the day for them, and you get you 0.30 revenge..

    Glazik

  216. off topic postal story by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    I have a friend (really I do) who gets a kick out of mailing all sorts of things (without packaging); some that come to mind:

    * a single can of Bud
    * a shoe
    * one roll of toilet paper
    * a bikini bottom
    * a stuffed rodent of some sort

    As a side note, he worked as a waiter to pay some one to goto college for him, got a 3.0 GPA and is a stock broker in NYC now.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  217. postage guaranteed vs. BRM postcards by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 1

    One important difference between postage guaranteed postcards and BRM postcards is that BRM postcards can not be taped or attached to other things. Also, anything you return using a BRM envelope must fit in the envelope. Otherwise, the postal service will return them.

  218. Payback by scotteparte · · Score: 1
    When I get unsolicited phone calls, I will sometimes ask them to hold and put the phone down in front of the radio, playing the worst crap I can find. Then I pick up, ask who they were looking for, and put them on hold again. After doing that a few times, I tell them that the office is closing, and they should call back tomorrow.

    Other times, I argue about the price or quality of their product for five or ten minutes before they realize just how much money they're losing on me. The beleaguered voice of a telemarketer saying "But... but... there's no monthly fee!" can make me laugh like nothing else.

  219. Awesome link! by OlympicSponsor · · Score: 3

    That was a great site! The scientific language kills me. They neglected a fruitful area of inquiry though: malformed addresses on otherwise normal items of mail. Heinlein commented in one of his books about receiving an (international!) piece of mail addressed to "Robert Heinlein, The United States". That was the sole address and (obviously) it got to him.
    --
    MailOne

    --
    Non-meta-modded "Overrated" mods are killing Slashdot
    (Hey Ryan! Here's your proof!)
  220. Put Spam in BRM envelopes! by meldroc · · Score: 1

    I think putting a slice of Spam (Hormel's mystery meat product) into the BRM envelope would result in some poetic justice, especially if it takes a long time to reach the junk mailer (/me retches uncontrollably.)

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
  221. That's a bit petty. by armb · · Score: 1

    Paper junk mail might be annoying, but there are opt-out lists, and the mailers do normally respect them, sometimes because there are laws saying they have to, but also because they have to pay to send the mail out, and want to do anything they can to improve their rate of return. (If you've asked to be taken off a mailing list and an incompetent company has ignored you, then fine, mail them inoffensive junk back reply paid until they get the message).
    email spammers are completely different - they aren't paying to send the stuff, so they couldn't care less how many addresses that aren't interested get used, so long as a few recipients are interested. I think half the time the company selling the product has been conned by a spam "marketing" company who get paid anyway so they don't even care if _nobody_ is interested, so long as they can invoice for sending some huge number of adverts.

    --

    --
    rant
  222. telemarketers by dingbarks · · Score: 1

    go get em the f@$&ers, how can we get the ones on the phone? this should be an international vendetta!

  223. Send back the junk too! by sciuro · · Score: 1

    I also send back the prepaid envelopes on junk mail, but with as much of the junk stuffed into it as possible too.

    -Duncan

  224. Spam : irl and uce. We have tools to fight. by node3667 · · Score: 1

    I often prefer displaying my real email on web site, on news groups, because I love fighting spammers. we have _tools_. *grin*

    uce :
    before spam :


    http://www.devin.com/sugarplum/ to protect your webserver from search bots.
    teergrubing to protect your MTA :
    http://www.iks-jena.de/mitarb/lutz/usenet/teergrub e.en.html
    (and of course, hide your email like that : xavieratbocaldotcsdotunivdashparis8dotSPAMfr ;-)

    after spam :


    http://spamcop.net/
    http://www.samspade.org
    http://mail-abuse.org(RBL)

    tools to semi-automaticly report/fight spam :

    http://freshmeat.net/appindex/console/anti-spam.ht ml

    irl :

    As other says, send back the empty enveloppe.

    One funny thing about phone spam is the possibility to talk to the person which is trying to sell you something, like to a human being. (after all, it's often a woman poorly payed to do this job. she(he) deserve humanity). I usually ask if the person is in good mood, and it's easier to say goodbye after this.

  225. Empty by drivers · · Score: 2

    (sending recipient-paid envelopes back)

    Hey, I just started doing that too! But why empty? That just makes it easier for them to sort out. Waste their TIME too. Have no use for that old Linux HOWTO printout? Stick a couple pages in there. Or some of the company's own flyers. Just don't send them back anything that has anything printed on it that would let them know who did it.

    Now if only I could figure out a way to Jam that bundle of loose ads (no envelope, like you'd find in the middle of a newspaper, but with more stuff of different sizes and materials) that they deliver every thursday... What, did the postman suddenly become the paperboy? It forces you to go through to make sure you aren't accidentally about to throw out your electric bill.

  226. Tape "postage garanted" postcards to bricks by crovira · · Score: 1

    I once received crap from some idiot who was sending me Spam with return enveloppes included but they were "return postage garanteed" enveloppes. The company HAS to pay the post office the postage due on what ever they received.

    It turned out that just about everybody in my office had received the same mailing. We taped the cards to bricks. The Spammer had to pay for sending about a hundred bricks through the mail.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  227. Don't respond! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4
    Don't send email to removal lists or to postmaster@spammeraddress.com!

    This may be a way for them to confirm.

    If they have a domain, trace it back to their provider! Let their provider cut off the service or their provider's provider do it.

    I have called spammers and they hang up, so I call back and explain to them how rude it is.

    What we have to do is to stop the people providing the SPAM lists. What about the SPAMMERs using open relays being charged with the computer tresspass statute--for using a mail relay w/o authorization?

  228. Fun things to do with spammers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I get this email from www.winamilliondollers.com all the time. I went to their website as described on their emails and unsubscribe. Well the next month they send me another email so I went through the same motions again, and it said that the email address was already marked for removal, to wait 24 hours. I got another email the next month, so I decided to take some real action.

    I looked up their uplink's email addresses to admin and such, add them to the spammer's spam list (thru the website) then added the spammer's own email addresses to the spamlist, then added a few random email addresses like @aol.com gary7@gary7.nsa.gov, and a few random ones i could think up.

    After a week i got a response from the spammer that told me they removed me, from their mail list and a casino mail list.

    2 months later they are back in my inbox.. (this week) So, it's time to start calling some isp's.

    I prefer not to use spam filters cuz it just wastes bandwidth. I like to get the problem resolved at the source. This past weekend I emailed a postmaster and had one spammer killed (or so the postmaster emailed me back they removed the account).

    Far as junk mail goes, I usually just rip it up and toss it, but now I belive I will be ripping up random things then sending them back. I have heard of ppl joking about junk mail being garbage and sending banana peels and other items capable of growing mold (coffee grounds anyone?)

    I just wish there was a spam filter that you can use that would return unknown user like an account died, so the spam programs would automatically remove the user.

  229. Lame Mailer software by bperkins · · Score: 1

    What pathetic MTA were they using? 2 million messages brings 8 mail servers to their knees? When BUGTRAQ was on netspace we had it running through zmailer, and we once got out 1.2 million mail messages in one day with a P133 with 128 megs of RAM.

  230. Send "sparkles" by CharlieG · · Score: 4

    I have it (on fairly good authority) that the best (worst) thing you can do to a junk mailer is send back those postage paid envelopes with an oz or so of the "sparkles" you can get in most craft shops.

    They are stick tenaciously to EVERYTHING, including the scan heads of the mail sorters, and jam up the works. Word has it that it takes about 1/2 hour to clean up after this happens

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  231. Put them on hold :) by saikou · · Score: 1

    What you can also do is to put them on hold. Elevator music didn't kill anyone yet and after 10 minutes you can always say that something really important (Oh Ma-m, I've just been decapitated - I have to run) happened.

    Unfortunately none of those tricks (including requests to remove from the list etc) work for Austin American Statesman - the worst telemarketer in Austin. And people who work for them are stupid.

    I had a verbiage on my answering machine that says "If you are from Austin American Statesman - never call me again about your subscriptions, I won't buy it". And then they called me again. Lady said "But this is not about the subscription. It's a special offer and you can get our paper for just $$$ a week". After short lection about what the subscription is I had to hang up on he.

    -----

  232. Postage paid by Glanz · · Score: 1

    "I now send the postage-page envelopes back from junk mailers." I know someone given to using spamware on spammers after tracking them to their often vague sources. He opens accounts where they have accounts then automatically forwards their stuff back to them after replying so they believe he's interested in their crapola. So far this has only created local mail "feedback" phenomena, normally in England. It does less harm to the "mother" system than believed, because the server has no choice but to remove the two accounts. Besides England, Israel seems to be pretty good Spam-wise.

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  233. Re:Sword Fighting??? by Desco · · Score: 1

    NERO is the worst piece of crap I've ever played. It's wannabe swordfighting combined with wannabe roleplaying, and it does neither effectively. Those pansies couldn't use a sword to save their lives. You want real sword fighting without some twink throwing bags-of-sand-that-are-supposed-to-be-spells at you? Try the SCA or one of the other many great sword fighting or rapier deuling groups in this world. Pussy gnome.

  234. Urban Legend"postage garanted" postcards to bricks by tarbabyxxxx · · Score: 1
    I once received crap from some idiot who was sending me Spam with return enveloppes included but they were "return postage garanteed" enveloppes. The company HAS to pay the post office the postage due on what ever they received.

    This is an urban legend. These bricks are not properly packaged according to US postal service regulations, therefore they are thrown away.

    --
    Will the last company to abandon Linux please turn off the lights??!
  235. K3wl!!! by mdb31 · · Score: 1
    Yeah, great -- just keep sending back those brick-filled envelopes, so more and more companies will stop using postage-paid envelopes and I'll have to use more and more of my own stamps for stuff like, oh, mailing checks to my cable company

    Every cool hack has a downside...

  236. Opt Out from Credit Card Mailings by er0ck · · Score: 1

    I read the fine print on the back of one of the many credit card mailings I receive several times a month. It listed a special Toll-Free number you could call to get off of all the major credit reporting agencies' mailing lists. Just dial 1-888-5OPTOUT The downside is that you have to give your Social Security Number, but all the Credit Agencies have that already. You can opt to stop receiving Credit Card applications PERMANANTLY. Does it work? Time will tell...

  237. More Revenge on Snail Mail Mpam by ayden · · Score: 2

    Don't return the envelope empty. Tear up every insert they send you and the original envelope into small pieces. Write "VOID! PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST!" anywhere your name appears. Insert these into the prepaid envelope and mail. The shreds of paper will jam the average automated Pitney Bowes letter opener.

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
  238. How to deal with spammers by KennyLB · · Score: 2

    I've found an effective method of dealing with spammers. I look up who owns the web site which is sending me spam, then send an email to the owner telling them the following:

    To Whom It May Concern:
    I recently recieved the attached email advertising your site. Due to the rising costs of internet access and the space which downloading email takes up, further emails advertising your site will be considered your electronic signature that I may send you a bill for $500 per email. This bill is for downloading and archival fees. All bills will be sent to the following address:
    [copy and paste of billing contact for domain name]
    Thank you for your time.


    I usually never hear from them again.

    --
    ~Ken
  239. marketing uber alles?! by Ocrates · · Score: 1

    Ever have a hard time finding the actual *bill* in your credit card bill for all the extra ad inserts or maybe you had to tear an ad off the return envelope before you could even use it? I like to tear up all that extra crap and stuff it in the envelope with the payment! Of course, none of them have stopped.. it just makes me feel better.

    --
    Ocrates
  240. More Ideas on my page by LennyDotCom · · Score: 1

    follow the link in my sig.
    to find out how you can ruin a spammers day
    and even cost them money

    --
    http://Lenny.com