Slashdot Mirror


Rolling Your Own Laptop?

rneches asks: "I've been looking around for a Linux friendly laptop, and I've found a couple of reasonable systems. However, there really aren't any laptops out there that really meet the needs of a Linux user. In particular, most laptops are, more or less, desktop replacements. As such, they are loaded with scads of nifty features, beefy processors, and so forth. This is great, I suppose, if you are running Windows or MacOS and want a desktop replacement. If you're a Linux user, and spend most of your time in emacs windows (er, frames), most of that fancy stuff is more of a liability than an asset. In other words, I'm talking about coders, admins and other Linux hackers more than I'm talking about the 'average user'." In short, rneches is looking to find a way to build his own laptop, and if the platform doesn't exist to be able to do this, he's looking for help in creating one. Interested?

"From a laptop, I want five things:

  • A nice, clear screen. Color is nice, but not critical. It should be big enough so that looking at it doesn't make me feel like I'm stuck in the coach section of a DC-9.
  • Decent 2D video performance. I might just be editing text, but at least it should look good while doing it. In any event, with decent a framebuffer and hardware acceleration, I can use nice anti-aliases fonts and play around with the window settings. This might sound frivolous, but nice-looking text and windows go a long, long way to relive eyestrain, which is exceedingly important.
  • Good physical utility. Too many laptops seem to be designed to sit on your desk, with the occasional trip to some other desk (transported in a deluxe, custom leather briefcase). This is OK if you are, say, the CEO, and don't do any real work in the first place. I want a laptop that is durable, light and small. I don't want to have to transport it in a special bag, or worry about fragile bits getting broken from normal use.
  • Insanely long battery life. I don't mean 'barely survive the flight from NWK to LAX'. I mean 'I'm only going to be in Tokyo for a week, so I won't need the AC adapter.'
  • Good built-in networking. No PCMCIA stuff, dongles, or other junk. The system should have a respected 100base-T card built in, and probably an 802.11b card and high-gain antenna as well.
If it can do that, I don't care all that much about CPU speed, disk storage, CD-ROM or DVD drives, USB, FireWire, IrDA or integrated late makers. Oh, and it needs to run Linux, or at least OpenBSD or NetBSD. So, basically, I want a tough little system with a StrongARM CPU, a flash disk and grayscale 1024x768 LCD. Insofar as I can tell, no one makes such a thing.

Which brings me to my point - Is it possible to roll your own laptop? I've looked at pc104 systems that might do the job for a base, and flash disks that would be great for storage and battery life, but the video, screen and enclosure are all somewhat of a mystery to me. I've taken apart Dells and (shudder) Sonys, and the video hardware is completely non-standard and funky. Each major brand of LCD has a different connector, and require a special (as in, not your average VGA compatible card) hardware to drive them. I'm not sure where I'd get a decent PS/2 keyboard that would be appropriate for a laptop. And as for the case itself - well, I'd probably need take out some life insurance, and then get in touch with those folks from the /. story a few months back about making storm trooper costumes from vacuum molded PVC.

I know this sounds like something of an absurd project, but then again, there once was a day when building a desktop PC was an absurd project. The pc104 standard seems like a pretty good standard to use in the same way desktop system use AT and ATX. Most of the pc104 boards are intended for ultra low power embedded systems, but there's no reason I can see that beefier chips couldn't be used. You'd have to give up the spiffy ZIF sockets, but laptops aren't really that upgradable anyway. Chances are, there's already a pc104 board that will do just about anything you want at very low power consumption. You could cram two or three pc104 boards into a really thin laptop (side by side, not stacked).

If someone started making pc104 video cards that could drive a host of different LCD screens, that would help a lot too. And, of course, someone would have to make some decent cases.

Is there anyone out there who's tried this? Any successes, I hope?

If I actually did go out and build my own laptop, do you think there would be enough general interest to get a community together? Maybe even start a little company to sell pc104 compatible laptop shells and the various adapters, trackpads, keyboards and other doodads that people would need?"

412 comments

  1. Pointless... by tweakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is dumb. You'll end up paying three times as much to develop this thing. Just go buy an ultraportable, like the Thinkpad X22... no drives built in, weighs barely anything... runs anything you want, and hell, you can even get it with linux pre-installed.

    1. Re:Pointless... by Senjiro · · Score: 2

      agreed. while there's a certain geek factor involved in building a laptop, the time and effort alone will cost double a brand new *insert laptop here*... parts will end up tripling that cost. roll your own desktop, and take the money you save there and put it into your kickin laptop purchase.

      --
      Help, I'm being repressed!
    2. Re:Pointless... by xdangavinx · · Score: 1

      as much as i'd hate to admit it - with this post being labeled flamebait and all - you really are going to end up spending just as much money on a system that has less bells and whistles to develope this custom laptop from scratch.

    3. Re:Pointless... by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The guy seems to be more interested in ruggedness and battery life than the cost. No platter drives, no case, a week long battery ... sounds like a NASA project, and I'm sure he's well aware of that. ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:Pointless... by m_evanchik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah but a thinkpad does not follow the specs with regard to battery life.

      I'd think, however, that maybe some of those old portables like the TRS-80 Model 100 might be closer to what's necessary. They at least had great battery life.

    5. Re:Pointless... by db_two · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would check with Itronix.... I would tend to think NOTHING can compare to their durability.

      See Itronix.com

      Not only are these very durable, They are drop tested multiple times, they are waterproof/dustproof, and able to stand temperatures varying from -15 to +140 F. They have a special LCD screen called Color-View and special keyboards that are illuminated.

      Check them out....

      --
      David Byrd
      CEO - 21st Century Tech., Inc.
      URL: http://www.nite-surfer.com
      See our Illuminated Keyboard
    6. Re:Pointless... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Panasonic Toughbook perhaps?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:Pointless... by walt-sjc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only 3 times as much??? Not hardly. Try 1000 times.

      I have the X20 (and a T21, and Sony Vaio PCG-F450) which is a slightly older version of the X22. Awesome little box. Small, Farily good battery life (requestors battery desires are TOTALLY impossible today, maybe when fuel cells are availbale....), networking, modem, etc. This box also has the add-on base for when you DO want drives, speakers, etc. and works with the newer version of IBM's docking stations (compatible with the T series.)

      Runs Linux nicely. Throw in a 802.11b card and you are set.To get the machine this person wants to build would cost millions in R&D meaning the first few off the assembly line would be WAY spendy (market for this thing would be on the order of hundreds...)

      Think things like cases, custom motherboards, keyboard, etc. Costs for the molds to make the case alone would run a good $200K. Cases like the IBM's made from composite's are VERY VERY expensive to have a line setup to produce. Now you could probably build a prototype the size of a desktop for a few thousand, but getting it small in one package is a whole different ball game.

      This idea seems to come from someone who really has no concept of the costs or issues involved with building a hardware product. Oh yeah, if you actually wanted to SELL one of these things, you need to get the product certified with multiple different agencies (gets worse for overseas.)

    8. Re:Pointless... by Fillup · · Score: 1

      yeah dude

      go for the Stinkpad or a compaq armada. My buddy has GNOME and everything running on an armada, and it displays text very nicely in text-only mode. He loves it -- and it has replaced his (windoze-based) stinkpad as a day-to-day computer. And this guy works in a windows-based IT group!!

      Above all, the armada seems to run RedHat at least without a single hassle. Recommended.

      --
      "I think there is a world market for, maybe, five computers." __ IBM Chairman, 1943 __
    9. Re:Pointless... by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The slashdot moderation system is getting out of hand. I've had decent posts modded to troll or flamebait for no apparant reason. I think maybe some moderators are just too sensitive or something.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    10. Re:Pointless... by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would very much like to see a Thinkpad that can stretch its batteries longer than 5 hours. I used to have an X24 for the exact same uses the story poster has in mind, just doing Perl/PHP/C development and occasionally playing a few mp3's in my car (though the sound chip is sucky).

      Its life always oscillated between 3-5 hours, most likely because the Pentium-3 was constantly running full-tilt, even though the thing was spending most of its time idling for input. For most purposes, aggressively throttling a fast cpu down to a minuscule duty cycle would work just fine while extending battery life at least 500%, yet you would still have some crunching power available if you really needed it. Let it run at 33mhz while I futz with the text editor, then kick it up to 1.0g when gcc fires up. That flaky Intel Speedstep stuff already does some throttling but it is very lax, even when set to "extend battery life". Perhaps if they added a "zombie mode" to run it at 1/20th of its rated mhz, it would still be plenty fast for the mundane coding binges we've been doing since the dark ages of the Apple II.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    11. Re:Pointless... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      "cost of the molds to make the case alone would run a good 200K"

      there was a company in seattle a few years back that a friend of a friend worked for - they specialized in making really rugged and water proof laptops. i mean like throw the thing at the ground and it wont break (the case that is... your HDD is another issue.) plus you could submerge them and they were fine... (liquid cooling anyone?:)

      anyway - I will keep looking to see if I can find em - but maybe a co like this who is already doing cool things with laptops could take care of the case for you - maybe other things as well... hopefully they are still in business... will reply if I find em.

    12. Re:Pointless... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      welp its not the same co - but here is one... with an easy to member url to boot (pun intended)
      ruggednotebooks.com

    13. Re:Pointless... by whookey · · Score: 1

      My TRS-80 m100's 40x4 line display doesn't meet the requirements of 1024x768 greyscale. It's really good for writing prose, which is why they're still popular with some journalists, but code is a nightmare. It's really fun to put in something like (BACKTICK) to be sed'ed to a '`' later when your keyboard has one 8^).

      --
      somebody bent my whookey.
    14. Re:Pointless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      radio shack model 100 - best laptop EVER. two weeks of battery life, and fucking unbreakable... with full-sized keys.

    15. Re:Pointless... by kawika · · Score: 1

      > The guy seems to be more interested in
      > ruggedness and battery life than the cost.

      Cost is never a problem--until you tell them the cost.

    16. Re:Pointless... by connorbd · · Score: 2

      And the closest you can come now is PalmPilot+keyboard. I would love to see a modern computer in a Trash-80 100 form factor, but we all know it would be running WinCE if it existed...

      /Brian

    17. Re:Pointless... by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Costs for the molds to make the case alone would run a good $200K.

      What a load of crap! Do you think car restorations cost $200k per panel? Creating a custom plastic or fibreglass piece is very cheap.

      It might be $200k to make a mold that will churn out 1000s of cases, but to make a one-off mold is nothing extraordinary.

    18. Re:Pointless... by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IBM Workpad Z50. It's a WinCE device that one can install NetBSD onto. http://www.orcawerks.com/sgi/misc/ibmz50/ has the info.

      Might be a better idea to get a slightly used laptop, though. As others have already said, an IBM thinkpad would be a good place to start.

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  2. Just make Linux work on the laptop by RexRuther · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Wouldn't it be easier to get Linux to work on a laptop instead of building a laptop from scratch.

    --
    -"The early bird catches the worm, but the late bird sleeps the most"
    1. Re:Just make Linux work on the laptop by Proteus+Child · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be easier to get Linux to work on a laptop instead of building a laptop from scratch.


      The problem there is that you're likely to have at least one device which isn't working properly on the laptop, usually a built-in modem. It's an imperfection which gets under your skin after a while. What is it Leon said in Bladerunner? "There's nothing worse than an itch that you can never scratch"?

      --

      Proteus' Child

      Doko ni datte; hito wa, tsunagette iru.

    2. Re:Just make Linux work on the laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier, yes -- better, no. It's the cowardly way out.

      It would mean M$ would get their tax. I'd rather pay twice the money for half the capability than agreeing to that, dammit.

    3. Re:Just make Linux work on the laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get an iBook from Apple. They run Linux beautifully, aren't that expensive, and have a good sized hard disk. When I read your requirements, I realized that the answer was sitting right in front of me. An Apple iBook.

    4. Re:Just make Linux work on the laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.

      You have expensive taste in spite, dude.

    5. Re:Just make Linux work on the laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't attribute to spite what is adequately explained by morality. Dude.
      Hmmm, should look at that Apple offering ;-)

    6. Re:Just make Linux work on the laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I guess you could spray paint it or something. The only problem to me about an Apple iBook is that it looks like ... well, an Apple.

      And there's only one 'mouse button' .. typical of Macs but when you're used to two or three, that really gets annoying fast.

    7. Re:Just make Linux work on the laptop by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Actually, the funny thing about the single-button mouse is that MacOS outgrew it when MacOS 8 came out. I've used a 2-button mouse since OS 8, as I imagine a lot of people do. I do love the new optical mouse, but the sad truth of the matter is that the day I can afford a new Mac that beaut of a pointing device will be the first thing to go into my desk drawer.

      It's unfortunate that Apple has yet to recognize this.

      /Brian

  3. What about TuxScreen by LowellPorter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about tux screen ? http://tuxscreen.net/

    Even though it's a telephone type system, you might be able to get enough information from it to build what you need. It has a ARM based processor running Linux. You might get some ideas from that.

    1. Re:What about TuxScreen by nowt · · Score: 2
      No battery unit. Keyboard is separate and memory is frankly way too small.


      Buying a cheap laptop is really best. Yes, not what the poster is after (I'd love to see something like this too) but it just doesn't yet exist.


      Some kind of ultraportable would fit his needs probably.

      --
      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess? - Joshua (Wargames)
    2. Re:What about TuxScreen by LowellPorter · · Score: 1

      If you're good enough at electronics, use ideas from tuxscreen and the portable playstation
      http://www.classicgaming.com/vcsp/PSp/PSp1.htm
      ** AND **
      the portable N64.
      http://www.classicgaming.com/nestable/p64.shtml
      figure out how they used camcorder batteries.
      You might be able to hack togethor something usable.

    3. Re:What about TuxScreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      images of miscellaneous items soldered and duct-taped together in a bag...

      "It's my custom 'lap-top' .. like it?"

  4. Why by candyuk · · Score: 0, Troll

    Do you have any idea how difficult it is to build a laptop?

    Before you attempt a roll your own take a laptop apart and see if you can get the thing back together. I amost garantee that you will not be able to get the case back on.

    Just buy one for heavens sake!!!

    You have to much tiem on your hands

    --
    Modern definition of an expert: Someone who comes from far away with a powerpoint presentation.
    1. Re:Why by .milfox · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've rebuilt this thinkpad 760 I use quite a few times, down to the system board level. IBM's got quite complete documentation anyone halfway decent with a screwdriver should be able to handle.

      Now, as far as what this guy should look at - IBM does make some great systems, with nice keyboards and the trackpoint that you don't have to leave your fingers from the 'home' positions to use.

      As far as battery life, there's the IBM Thinkpad S30 off dynamism.com http://www.dynamism.com/thinkpad/index.shtml
      *drool* :)

      Or you can pick up one of the new R serise thinkpads, get an ultrabay secondary battery module, *and* get an adapter for a number-pad.

      =)

      Okay, enough pimping ibm stuff. But I do love their laptops, though.

    2. Re:Why by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 1

      wow, all the stuff on dynamism makes me wonder why the heck those companies aren't selling those models in the US.

      oh yeah, the PRICE.

      get a new iBook. costs about half the price. but i do admit that the dynamism.com stuff looks SWEET.

      but sorry, no "week without an AC adapter". on dyanmism there is a laptop with a crusue which boasts 10 hours, it would be very hard to beat that.

      -sam

      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    3. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://goessex.com/store/powerad_internat.html

      Buy an international power adapter and use it in conjunction with IBM Thinkpad...

    4. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iBook?

      If I wanted a little girl's makeup kit at a reasonable price, I would go to the toy department.

    5. Re:Why by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 1

      you are obviously referring to the OLD iBooks, which DO look like little girl's makeup kits.

      however the current iBook looks very slick. Built in modem, firewire, ethernet, usb, vga out, 12.1 inch, 1024-by-768 screen, DVD, AirPort ready, 4.9 pounds, 1.35 inches thick, and from $1299 (cheaper if you are a student). you can't get a nicer, sweeter laptop for the money.

      girl's makeup kit? maybe you should keep a little more current.

      -sam

      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    6. Re:Why by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

      Haha... I looked at http://www.dynamism.com/thinkpad/index.shtml

      What's so special about that machine?

      IBM Thinkpad S30 (PIII-600, 20gb, 128mb, 100/10baseT, IEEE1394, WinME), $2599?

      Hell, Toshiba had Home/PgUp/PgDn/End keys without fn-combination on their laptops forever.
      Satellite 5005-S504 costs ONLY $2000, has ENGLISH keyboard (dont EVER buy a japanese laptop with japanese keyboard, you will NOT like it)...
      P3 1,1ghz, *512*MB ram, 30gb hdd, 3 usb, 1394, 15" LCD, geforce2 video card... Who would want a overpriced IBM for almost 1.5 the price, and half the features, and with japanese keyboard? Hah...

      Looking at Japanese computers almost daily I actually ordered my laptop from U.S. because you simply cant beat the price or the features of machines made in the U.S.A even if they are from "Japanese" makers such as Toshiba etc.

      And, for some people, "SWEET" is a lot less important than "USABLE".

    7. Re:Why by maverick_and_goose · · Score: 1

      don't you sleep charge the battery then. don't be so lazy. im sure they have electricity in tokyo. bring an adapter if the port is different. sleep = charging of battery. im not sure if bsd is going to work with a transmeta crusoe but if you can live with linux then you might like a Fujitsu P series it has been getting great reviews, weighs 3.5 pounds or something like that, it is supposed to work well with linux, and you can get it with a battery that lasts 7 hours plus if you get the docking station it can last up to 14 so learn to charge you battery

      --
      Whose idea was it to put Windows servers on the net in the first place, anyway?
  5. Build your own laptop? by iBod · · Score: 5, Interesting
    there really aren't any laptops out there that really meet the needs of a Linux user

    In what way? I have run Linux (various distros) on a variety of laptops ranging from an old toshiba T3400 to various Tecra's and Thinkpads without too many problems.

    Anyhow, building your own laptop would be quite a challenge. You don't have a choice of nice, standard-sized mobos that fit nice standard enclosures. Laptop parts (mobos, cases, screens) are made to fit by the manufacturer, there ain't much you can change except for the HDD.

    And you don't want PCMCIA (PC-CARD), well bang goes most of your hardware customisation options right there!

    1. Re:Build your own laptop? by spamacon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with your comment. Old laptops seem very well suited for a Linux machine, but...

      >>And you don't want PCMCIA (PC-CARD), well bang goes most of your hardware customisation options right there!

      I think you might have missed the point of the comment. He wants good built in networking, not some funny PCMCIA card with one of those flimsy cables that everyone looses. He doesn't mention ditching PCMCIA altogether (like legos with out the little bumps), just doesn't want to use it for networking.

      spamacon

      --

      - Do not paint -
    2. Re:Build your own laptop? by iBod · · Score: 1

      Yes, sorry, I did miss the point about the NIC.

      But then what alternatives are there? Was he suggesting a built-in/mobo NIC? I don't know of any.

      I know pccard NICs with flimsy cables are a pain sometimes but at least they are (fairly) cheap and easily upgradeable.

    3. Re:Build your own laptop? by derF024 · · Score: 1

      all the thinkpad t-series laptops have built in 10/100 nics.

      anyway, another choice would be a doublesize pc-card nic. I have a thinkpad 600e and i use a xircom realport card.. no dongles whatsoever, and it works wonderfully under linux.

    4. Re:Build your own laptop? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      not all network pcmcia cards use a dongle to jack in your cat 5 cable. my thinkpad has a little slide out that comes out of the card, the wire just plugs into that. yes, it seems very prone to breakage, but i haven't broken one yet. i don't know of anyone in our office that has either.

      this question of building your own laptop to "meet your specs" comes up often, but the fact is that it isn't at all cost effective to do it. it really sounds like this person just wants a "dream machine" not a laptop. he originally says he wants just something for coders, then needs anti-aliased fonts?!? if you want pretty, you better stick to OS X on those cute i-book or power book machines. if you want to be a coder (non-java) get an old P233.

      finally.. battery life for a week in japan? now it almost sounds like someone's trolling here. what kind of portable devices will have that kind of battery power? sorry, an electric shaver just doesn't get used enough to qualify.

    5. Re:Build your own laptop? by iBod · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I don't have a t-series :(

      But obviously built-in NIC is the way to go.

    6. Re:Build your own laptop? by jon+doh! · · Score: 1

      some of the newer cards you plug the cable directly into the card. no dongle, no slide, just an open jack for the cable. of course if the pcmcia slots are positioned wrong, the single card can end up taking both slots, but the last time i used both slots is when i had one card each for modem and lan. they're a little more expensive, but the last two i've bought were recognized right away by linux (rh7.2).

    7. Re:Build your own laptop? by spamacon · · Score: 1

      I don't know that it is so dreamy. Think about it like this: If you were going to be working on this thing a lot, like this person says he will, and using strictly text based (or low-end gui) then you want a nice big screen (so you can see a lot) and nice clear text (so you can read what you see). He doesn't need it to be particularly fast, support color, or have all sorts of expandability options. My dream laptop would be all that, plus light and armed with a big screen.

      But, I certainly agree about the battery. That might be a pipe dream until some fuel cell technology becomes useful in laptops. For now, he'll have to lug that charger to Japan, or bring several batteries.

      spamacon

      --

      - Do not paint -
    8. Re:Build your own laptop? by Mathetes · · Score: 1

      My Omnibook 500 works great under Linux. It has a built in NIC. The only thing not supported is the built-in winmodem and the volume control buttons.

    9. Re:Build your own laptop? by router · · Score: 1

      Not exactly, they use mini-PCI cards (if your RJ-45 port works in concert with your modem, then you have a combo card). Its located under one of those screw on covers, along with the memory SO-DIMMS.

    10. Re:Build your own laptop? by Tuzanor · · Score: 2

      almost all new thinkpads now have a built in Intel Pro/100 ethernet card.

    11. Re:Build your own laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 3135 ipaq runs for 6 days w/o a charge, so nice I'm not sure if I want to "upgrade" to a 3765 or 3800...

  6. I agree it is dumb by mnf999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look,

    You are asking for a lot of trouble and I doubt you will be satisfied with your hackies result.

    I am a typical "power-user" and have cycled through many laptops and machines but it seems I am settling on my laptop just for mail, and do all my development on a box. Just the raw power makes a huge difference.

    I used to love my Linux laptop about 2 years ago, I felt so sophisticated. Tell you the truth I am running w2k on it now (A Sony Vaio), just wasn't worth the trouble. Then my box runs Linux (RH) and I do most of my java development on it, I am very happy with it.

    Bottom line is this: Laptops and boxes are very different in how sensitive they are to "fucking around". It is pretty simple to assemble a box from scratch, even fun and economical but with Laptops I wouldn't fuck with quality, you need high end material and high end assembly, otherwise you are going to have a clunky thing that doesn't hold up... and then the linux choice to boot is imho a mistake, but that is another story.

    Get real,

    marcf

    --
    The real mnf999 always posts as anonymous coward
    1. Re:I agree it is dumb by Skraggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree.

      My F250 Vaio came with Win98.

      I shifted that quicksmart

      Put Mandrake 7 on it,

      got the Irda working, PCMCIA came working out of the box.

      Come Mandrake 7.1, Irda stopped, but USB started working for my CPIA webcam. Very cool, but I couldn't dial out from my cellphone anymore.

      7.2 had pretty much the same results

      Installed Win2k, and it works, and is sort of stable.
      I use Mandrake 8.0 on my file server/devbox, and dual boot, win98/Mandrake 7.2 on my girlfriends machine for games, and win2k on my SMP BP6 workstation/game box.

      I would love to run Mandrake on my Laptop again, becuase it was so much faster than win2k, but as a whole win2k has been more compatable with my day to day laptop needs of the occasional game of Command and Conquer, getting mail, and using my wireless lan card (yes I know my wifi card can be used in Linux), getting sound that worked without blackmagic, and irda transfer, and dial out.

      BTW when I did get IRDA working in Mandrake 7, I did get the file transfering from my cellphone working in linux fatser than one the guys at work got it working on his Win98 Laptop.

      --
      A Skoda is for life, not for casual humour.
    2. Re:I agree it is dumb by tzanger · · Score: 2

      I used to love my Linux laptop about 2 years ago, I felt so sophisticated. Tell you the truth I am running w2k on it now (A Sony Vaio), just wasn't worth the trouble. Then my box runs Linux (RH) and I do most of my java development on it, I am very happy with it.

      I've been running Linux on my laptop for about a year now. Used to be Win98 but one day I just got sick of rebooting and reinstalling every 12-18 months. I'd been using Linux on all my servers and firewalls so I figured why not give it a try on the desktop?

      I run Slackware 8.0 with XF4.1.0 with WindowMaker and KDE2.2.1 from CVS (I hack around on it a bit) -- the antialised fonts are great, the screen works perfectly, the video card, PCMCIA, sound and USB subsystems are all supported more or less flawlessly. I'm having issues with printing but I think I'm going to dump CUPS and try LPRng or something; I'm getting sick of fiddling with it.

      I used to run Win4Lin daily to get the office aspects of my job done but now the only time I boot it is to run MPLAB, an IDE which drives the ICE I use in my embedded development. KOffice does 99% of my office needs and KMail/KNode work pretty damn good for POP3/IMAP and NNTP handlers. What Konqueror bungs up on Opera seems to take care of.

      This laptop is about 3 or 4 years old now. It's a Hyperdata MediaGo 950AGP: Celeron 300, 256M RAM and a 10G drive. I get about 3 hours of battery life out of the thing, even watching DVDs (that was back in Windows when the ALI M3909 hardware MPEG2 decoder worked). If I'm doing heavy compiling then drop that time down about 40-50%. The notebook doesn't get overly warm in my lap and its sleep mode seems to be compatible with Linux for the most part. Hell, I take multiple-hour baths and surf the net/IRC with it (wireless card) -- I have one of those old wrought-iron claw-foot tubs which holds the heat forever and a 3/8" sheet of plywood goes across it to rest the notebook or any books and drinks I have. Yeah it's a little weird but it's a form of relaxation. :-)

      So, at least for me, it hasn't been more hassle than its worth. Win98 was a hassle. Win2k won't work on this machine (the install freezes every time, Hyperdata support claims there is something not supported by Win2k). Linux has been a godsend for me. I've been offered notebook upgrades from work but I've really come to like this little one. I've even ordered plastic subassemblies a few times to repair cracks from overuse and misuse (I tend to pick it up by one corner and that strains one of the shell pieces).

      aside: if anyone can find drivers or specs for the M3909 MPEG2 decoder I'd love to hear from you. I don't understand why they EOL a product and still refuse to give out data on it. A cel300 is a little weak for DVD/DivX decode so I'd at least like to try for half. Hell, this thing has an ATI Rage Mobility graphics chip in it; if ATI would release a Linux DVD player I'd be happy too!

    3. Re:I agree it is dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, this thing has an ATI Rage Mobility graphics chip in it; if ATI would release a Linux DVD player I'd be happy too!

      If ATI would put out a decent linux video driver I would be happy.
      I've got a dell c600 with an ATI Rage Mobility running redhat 7.2, and the only thing its missing is hardware openGL support.
      Its fine for programming, and web surfing and all other typical geek stuff, except for gaming. UT just sucks at 2 frames a second.

    4. Re:I agree it is dumb by Lechter · · Score: 2

      Actually, I beg to differ. If all you do is Linux development and administration, then you're going to want that, and there really isn't a substitute.

      Take my friend who has a large linux development project, but needs to travel fairly often. He has a Vaio and it's essentially useless to him. He can't exactly ssh into his development box while he's on the road (and under windows he can't get good X-Windows forwarding anyway). There really isn't an option for him. He has to have Linux. But because of the wierd propriatary devices Sony uses he can't find a distro that will support Sony's CD-ROM.

      Of course the question that was asked here was not "Why don't I want to build a good basic Linux laptop?" but "How do I build it."

      With that in mind, an avenue that might be worth pursuing, would be to look into embedded systems designed to be deployed in the field: to truck drivers, and scientists in remote locations.

      I haven't looked into these things in a few years, but last time I did. I seem to recall that they had pretty good systems with decent battery life, LCD's, and a fairly impressive degree of "hackability."

      There are clearly caveats involved in constructing your own portable - you're certainly not likely to come up with something as compact and elegant as a Titanium or even a Sony Vaio. But I'm sure this fellow is well aware of the difficulties - he wouldn't have gone to /. if he weren't. After all 10-12 years ago people might have said "Build your own desktop computer? Your asking for a lot of trouble and you'll never be satisified with your result. Just go buy a PC Jr.or PS/2 from IBM.

      --
      credo quia absurdum
    5. Re:I agree it is dumb by hardburn · · Score: 2

      You know that Madrake 7 and 7.1 were second only to Corel for the most flaky distros ever, don't you?

      --
      Not a typewriter
    6. Re:I agree it is dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell is a "power user" anyway - just another name for idiot

  7. Battery life vs... by Mike+Connell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe considering that you want really really good battery life, you should consider stipping yet more out of the specification.

    I was wondering if, as an emacs user, you could cope with a real text-only display - just like a text mode console. Surely the lack of video RAM, bandwidth etc should save some power?

    1. Re:Battery life vs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, possibly.. He should invest in some nuclear resonance battery reserarch. NR batteries can deliver up to half of their designed power output untill the halflife of the material used. Using some low grade strontium or something, you could have a battery that would deliver power for 20 or so years...

      Expecting today's energy storage technologies to last a week (when most last only a few hours) is just plain rediclious. Maybe fuelcells or NR batteries are the answer to this problem. Either way, they wont be at your local CompUSA any time soon, unless Morotola gets of their sorry butts and uses their patents.

    2. Re:Battery life vs... by ben_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...a text mode console. Surely the lack of video RAM, bandwidth etc should save some power?

      Um... not really. The thing that eats power for displays is the backlighting of the LCD. You might try looking for a reflected-light LCD display if anyone makes such a thing - would need no backlight but you'd only be able to work in well-lit areas :-)

      --
      ben_ the technologist and platform agnostic
  8. two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TOSHIBA TECRA

  9. Sounds like all you want is a Palm Pilot by jojo1835 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With a bigger screen and better video. Maybe take a look at an iPaq, grab an expansion chassis and a couple of NIC's (Whichever you want), and have a blast. You can even install Linux on it, if that's what really floats your boat.

    --
    See... and you thought your sig was boring - TT
    1. Re:Sounds like all you want is a Palm Pilot by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 1

      now THAT is a great idea. MOD this UP!
      it IS what he's looking for.
      the new IPAQ is a 233 strongARM or something ridiculous right?
      just get a keyboard and you are all set.
      that is as portable as i need.
      all my machines are setup for remote access anyway so i can use them from wherever i am.
      do up your code in emacs on the IPAQ,
      maybe even run the parser, but do the compiling and linking on your powerboxen later.
      cooool

    2. Re:Sounds like all you want is a Palm Pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "StrongARM CPU, a flash disk and grayscale 1024x768 LCD."

      hp jornada 820e handheld PC
      Ebay: $150-300

  10. linux-laptop.net by humanasset · · Score: 3, Informative
    Why don't you just go to www.linux-laptop.net and just select one from your vendor of choice?

    It will save you much aggrivation and probably a lot of money as well.

    1. Re:linux-laptop.net by .milfox · · Score: 1

      I don't suppose you've got a source for nice laptops without the windows tax? I'd rather my $90 os cost go to say, RH or SuSE or Mandrake, rather than MS.

    2. Re:linux-laptop.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And take away your right to grumble and gripe?

      Heavens! We can't have that!!

      Oh, and your 'OS cost' is about $15, not $90.

    3. Re:linux-laptop.net by Suppafly · · Score: 1
  11. iMac by b_pretender · · Score: 2
    What about the new iMac?

    It has many of the features that you asked about.

    1. Re:iMac by b_pretender · · Score: 1

      s/iMac/iBook/g;

    2. Re:iMac by $hy_guy · · Score: 1

      Here is site that tells you how to get linux installed on you TI powerbook http://www.dachb0den.com/projects/tibook-linux.htm l I have yet to try on mine but this could be a nice way to get linux on a ibook.

  12. PC104 ! by teambpsi · · Score: 4, Informative

    PC104 is an old, but still very usable reference platform for building embedded devices.

    Hit this google link

    Google Search on PC104

    It has a much greater use/life in Europe than it ever did here in the States.

    The little modules are stackable, and they make little "backplane" like boards for you to put the modules.

    Or as Egg Chin in Big Trouble in Little China said, "Its like your salad bar -- we take what we want, and leave the rest for everyone else"

    --

    Old age and treachery almost always overcome youth and skill.
    1. Re:PC104 ! by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

      He said StrongARM. PC104 is Intel x86. I suppose you could have a PC104-like form factor with a Dragonball (MC68xx328), StrongARM or some other embedded non-Intel processor, but you'd have to design your chipset from scratch...

    2. Re:PC104 ! by jandrese · · Score: 2

      The biggest problem I have with PC104 hardware is the cost. Most of it is ment for industrial type applications where people don't mind paying $100 for a 10 Base-T NIC and a thousand dollars for a 133Mhz PC.

      Also, PC104 boards are terrible for laptops. They are ment to be stackable (vertically!) and each card is pretty high (about an inch thick) to start with. You could probably build ribbon cables and special connectors for PC104 boards, but if you're going to that much trouble you might as well just buy a cheap laptop and rip it's mobo out.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:PC104 ! by JesseL · · Score: 2

      There is nothing specifically x86 about pc104. It's just an ISA bus (and PCI bus with pc104+) with funky connectors. Existing StrongARM chipsets (SA1111?) would work fine.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    4. Re:PC104 ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might take a look at these guys:
      http://www.advantech.com/products/
      They've got 486 Single Board Computers the size of a 3.5" drive that have Ethernet and VGA for about $300.

      You're probably better off starting with an old laptop, pulling out the drives and replacing them with flash (compact flash can be wired to an IDE port), then filling the extra space with batterys somehow.

    5. Re:PC104 ! by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 1

      ISA is an x86-specific bus, meaning that it was designed around the pinout scheme of the 8086; you'd need some kind of glue logic to interface non-x86 CPUs to ISA. With PCI, you'd most likely have to design your own PCI chipset, and it seems like that would be more complicated than interfacing to ISA.

  13. Thinkpad 760xl by apathy21 · · Score: 0

    Heh...I've had no trouble getting even Debian to work on my IBM Thinkpad 760XL. Sounds to me like
    meches just hasn't put enough effort into getting
    a laptop to work the way he/she wants it to.

  14. options by nate1138 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, you could start with some pc-104 components, add a pcmcia module, an LCD control module, etc. Or you could base it off of one of many SBC's available in the EBX little board format such as this one from Ampro. Then you just have to find an open-frame LCD to use, pick some drives and fabricate your own case. Easy right ;-).

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  15. Uh. by TheKodiak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I know this sounds like something of an absurd project, but then again, there once was a day when building a desktop PC was an absurd project."

    What day was that? 1950? First Desktop PCs were sold as kits, you realise.

    --
    -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
    1. Re:Uh. by gregorio · · Score: 0
      "I know this sounds like something of an absurd project, but then again, there once was a day when building a desktop PC was an absurd project."

      What day was that? 1950? First Desktop PCs were sold as kits, you realise.
      Leave him alone, he submitted this article just to show how 1337 he is, he wants to be recognised as the big revolutionary he pretends to be.
      This is not flamebait, I am just tired of the "I am 1337" kind:

      "If you're a Linux user, and spend most of your time in emacs windows (er, frames), most of that fancy stuff is more of a liability than an asset. In other words, I'm talking about coders, admins and other Linux hackers more than I'm talking about the 'average user'."
      "This is OK if you are, say, the CEO, and don't do any real work in the first place."

      This kind of attitude that makes us look like a bunch of arrogant loosers. Who this guy think he is?
    2. Re:Uh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1974, actually.

      Although the PDP-8 was a pretty nice small package.

    3. Re:Uh. by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      That day would have been around 1978 or so.

      I might remind you that the Apple ][ wiped the floor with the kit-based PCs of the day, because it came in an integrated box.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  16. Old ThinkPads by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I suggest taking a look at some old (used) IBM ThinkPads. I've used them for years, and for the most part they're great. They're too expensive when they're new, but the older systems have just about everything you're asking for. Most had built-in Ethernet at least as an option. Many had CD-ROM as only an option, with the space replacable with an extra battery or hard drive. They're a decent size and well-built. The ones with butter-fly keyboards (expand when opened) are exceptionally small.

    The only issue could be battery life. But like I said, with some models you can drop the extra drive and use a battery instead, or maybe IBM sells better modern batteries that would fit in the old systems.

    So check out models from IBM and then search for them on auction sites and such. Good luck!

    P.S. When you've found or built what you're looking for, let us know what linux distro you used, or how you built your own, since so many of us have issues getting Linux up on laptops.

    1. Re:Old ThinkPads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ive always had great luck with linux on thinkpads. If you want small, their old 3 series is like 5x7". Dont know about battery life. However, I just carry a couple of batteries with me when im travelling. I currently use only the A22m w/ rh 7.2, and havent touched my desktop in quite a while. I dont mind the weight, and it goes EVERYWHERE with me. Plus, its fast, easily expandable, and doeseverything i want it to. If you want lighter, go with a T series.

    2. Re:Old ThinkPads by iBod · · Score: 1
      so many of us have issues getting Linux up on laptops

      Just out of interest, what kind of issues?

      Most of my own issues are video/audio related.

    3. Re:Old ThinkPads by Schrodinger's+Mouse · · Score: 1

      I'll agree. Some Thinkpads even come with the IBM "UltraBay" - the keyboard lifts up, providing access to the hard drive, battery, RAM, and CD/floppy bay - so that you can easily swap out components.

      I found the parts for a TP760XL on eBay for a decent price (~$300 total) and assembled it myself. Right now I've got Debian on there, and I've only had a few minor display issues. However, thanks to extensive documentation on www.linux-laptop.net and the helpful folks on the linux-thinkpad mailing list, I fixed those; now it runs like a dream.

      I'm not terribly impressed with my 760XL's battery life. However, with a little auction savvy, you can get a decent spare for a reasonable price.

      Whether you go for a Thinkpad or some other laptop, though, it'd still be a hell of a lot cheaper and less stressful than building your own.

      --

      *****

      There are many people in this country who, through no fault of their own, are sane.

    4. Re:Old ThinkPads by truthsearch · · Score: 2

      The most common issue I hear about it exactly that: video and audio. Most of the hardware, at least in the older laptops, all seem proprietary and unique to laptops.

  17. Apple PowerBook G4! by nbvb · · Score: 4, Informative

    The TiBook G4 has almost _EXACTLY_ the features you want.

    It runs Yellow Dog Linux very, very nicely.

    And the wide-screen aspect ratio on its display is FANTASTIC for running side-by-side xterms....

    --nbvb

    1. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought one, and I'd agree -- it's perfect for this, almost. The new revision of the laptops take a lot of fiddling for the video hardware to work right, and they won't sleep properly at all. Otherwise, very, very nice. The battery life isn't ridiculously long, though.

    2. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The latest release of Yellow Dog (2.1) fixed the sleep problem, and you only need to tell the bootloader on the install CD which framebuffer driver to use during the install process. Once you have the install going, you shouldn't have any display issues. If you want longer battery life, the iBook is probably a better choice.

    3. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by squaretorus · · Score: 2

      The TiBook G4 has almost _EXACTLY_ the features you want

      Agreed! And it looks the bizznizz aswell. It'd probably work out cheaper aswell!

    4. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 2

      Um, no it doesn't. The thing is not rugged at all. I'm not that hard on my equipment and mine is suffering after only a few months. Secondly, the big display really limits batterly life. I can pull a full 4 hours out of a battery, but only if the lighting is right such that i can see with the display brightness at minimum. The nearly-hot-swappable batteries are quite nice for this, though (you just close it up, let it finish going to sleep, and swap the batteries).

      The display is huge and the titanium supporting it is quite thin. Added to Apple's Wonderful Idea(TM) to actually have the keyboard and the LCD almost touching, you wind up damaging your display if you squish anything (soft muffin crumbs killed some of my pixels) in there.

      Then, i had left it closed on the coffee table. One of my kittens jumped on the side hanging off, and the latch broke. It fell under 2 feet. Half a meter fall, and it's busted. I now have to ship it back to Apple, where they will look at it and _then_ give me a quote to fix it.

      I almost never run terminals side-by-side, either; perl one-liners get really long, and if it doesn't wrap, i'm a happier camper.

      Anyway, i'd think twice before picking up a PBG4, especially if you're going to be beating on it. I'm very close to the point of having my credit card company refund my money and return the product to Apple as "Unsatisfactory." It's a beautiful machine, very cool, and very powerful, but it's not up to my standards for durability.

      -josh, who wishes everything was as durable as his TI-85

    5. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd reccomend the G4 for anyone who really needs the power. However, the iBooks is just as geat a model for what this guy needs. Certianly, it dosne't have the nice Radeon chipest (drewl), but the batteries last longer, and it's smaller, lighter, thinner.
      The only thing is the case can get pretty ugly quick of you don't take care. Mine is all scratched, and I use it alot on a desk, and taking it to school in a padded case. The only thing I can think that scratches it are the zippers on my case...

    6. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For one who says they aren't hard on their equipment, you sure do some stupid things. A 2 ft drop is an extremely hard thing to design for, let alone anything higher. If you really want something tough as nails, check out the Toshiba Toughbook series. Crumbs in the keyboard.... really...
      Atleast you don't use your Powerbook as an ashtray.

    7. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by dhamsaic · · Score: 2

      That would be Panasonic ToughBook, as in http://www.panasonic.com/toughbook. Yes, they are rugged as hell.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    8. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

      Various companies are making 'sleeves' these days for portables...
      A quick search on google turned up the following:
      http://www.macyummies.com/jammacsleevf.html.

      For $30 or so, you can keep away most scratches, and get a little bit of extra cushion for those accidental drops.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    9. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by jht · · Score: 2

      Maybe an iBook instead. Very rugged, easy on the battery, wireless built-in, speedy but not blazing. Fairly, cheap, too - as laptops go.

      But as long as you want a nice screen, wireless, and plenty of storage, you can forget about long battery life - regardless of CPU. Those three things suck a lot more power than the CPU does. And if you want enough power to keep it going ad infinitum - forget about portability.

      Laptops are full of design compromises, but if the original poster really thinks there's a market for his kind of spec, he should try and gather some funding and contract a Taiwanese manufacturer (like Alpha Top) to design and build them. Hardly anyone makes their own laptops anymore, anyway.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    10. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the equivalent PC machine, look at an IBM Thinkpad T22 or T23. Same "wide-aspect" screen, etc, my T22 runs Linux perfectly.

    11. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      I have one and it's the best thing I've ever bought. I don't expect it to be amazingly rugged, but combined with a protective sleeve and a leather cover for the keys, I expect it to last for a long time; at least three years. That's what I look for when I buy a system.

      Apple has a bad reputation on laptops and flimsy hinges. The flexing thing on the monitor is something to watch out for, as is the fact that the thing gets freakin' hot when it sits directly on your lap (I rest mine on the carry pouch as an insulator).

      I bought mine for computer animation purposes, and I expect it to serve my needs nicely. In addition to OS X, I also want to add a Linux distro to it eventually, to satisfy my techno-geek needs (any recommendations?)

      Yes, rugged durability is a good thing. However, I still wash and wax my car to protect the finish. A little care goes a long way.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    12. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot and the story you tell is a lie.

    13. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new TiBooks have a redesigned lid that solves the problems you speak of.

    14. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by mblumber · · Score: 1

      This is off topic, but I once dropped a TI85 out of a moving car at 45mph. It got scratched up, but still works perfectly.

      --
      Anyone who posts about bad moderation are themselves off-topic and should be moderated accordingly.
    15. Re:Apple PowerBook G4! by labrn · · Score: 1

      With the noted exeception of ruggedness - I grant you that the TiBook is sexy and the larger screen is amazing but you have to admit the TiBook requires a protective sleeve when putting it in your laptop bag and it is not really useable as a portable using it on your lap or on an airplane. BUT - the Apple iBook has a great screen, is small, VERY rugged and runs Darwin (BSD) (or you can install LinuxPPC). The iBook is *designed* to be used by school kids and college students and to be thrown into bookbags and not treated "carefully".

      This matches just about all the criteria except battery life. But the battery life request is not easily met - and is a bit unreasonable.

  18. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM THINKPAD

  19. linux by British · · Score: 2

    I think one's effort would be better spent with improving Linux hardware support instead of going through the hassle of building a laptop from scratch.

    Akin to turning the house around to install a light bulb.

  20. Why dont you use an older laptop by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    If you really just use your laptop for emacs editing (in console mode) and use Linux, why don't you just use an older latop? I'm sure you can find some cheap on ebay.

    My only laptop is a Toshiba Satellite 210CT, which is a P120 with 32Meg RAM and it has CD-Rom and 1.3 Gig harddisk and TFT 800x*600 screen (2 dead pixels). I use this machine more than my "big" desktop machine. It does basic surfing and email with WindowMaker (browser:Opera), so I guess doing emacs on console shouldn't be a problem at all. Okay, compile time (I suppose you develop C/C++) could take a while but everyone needs a good coffee/tea/mountain dew-break once in a while.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Why dont you use an older laptop by dda · · Score: 1

      You're right, but he still has to find a good battery fitting his needs to work with that kind of computer. I suppose it's not too hard to find an old computer with a 1024*768 screen, but don't forget he would like to have it light. That's probably why.

  21. here's what you need: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really, really, really big E-Z Widers and about a pound or more of blunt.

  22. Processor power a liability? by Jason+Straight · · Score: 1

    Don't think so when you have to compile a kernel or some other large source file. I rather like having 512MB Ram and a fast processor in my laptop so I can spend more time coding and less time waiting.

    1. Re:Processor power a liability? by pete-classic · · Score: 2

      All else being equal (which it usually isn't) faster processor means more power consumption.

      It doesn't sound like this guy plans on spending a lot of time jerking around compiling kernels (anyway, that's what scp is for, compile it on a fast box, then copy it over). There is even the very real possiblity that he works for a joint with a compile farm, and he never farts around compiling crap on his local box. Even if he does do local compiles regularly, if his app is well designed he only needs to re-compile his code and re-link anyway.

      So, given the parameters emacs, networked, ultra-long battery life, yes, a fast processor is a liablity.

  23. Why? by alfredo · · Score: 1

    Any basic laptop will do. I saw an iBook running YellowDog Linux. It was a refurb for under $1,000. He added a three button mouse and was having a lot of fun.

    If you want to do it for an intellectual challenge, go for it, but don't confuse it with anything practical at this stage.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  24. How about tuxtops? by xiaix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tuxtops used to do it but are now focusing on software. Their hardware buisness is being handled by QLITech Personally, when I wasnt using x, an old Compaq presario 1210 running Slackware worked well (except of course the modem. Now I am running a Sony Vaio PCG-FX240 with Red Hat 7.2, and it has no problems (except the modem, which I have no need for with broadband everywhere I use it. ). (Slack install didnt go as well as I would have liked...) A great deal of useful info can be found on the Linux on laptops page.

    --

    Have you read the Moderator Guidelines yet?

  25. The CEO pays your salary dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah you are such a special coder with such special needs - woooooo.

    Just buy a Dell and quit posturing.

    Why do so many people think that using Linux somehow makes them other than average?

    You think you are better than the CEO because you use Emacs?

    1. Re:The CEO pays your salary dumbass by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      I mean if he used vi that would be a different story. That would clearly make him better, right?

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
  26. Good and Bad Idea. by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

    I wish to God there was standard laptop parts like desktop parts, but the fact of the matter is: there isn't!

    Not to mention that putting a laptop together is a general bitch! I once, when I was working as a computer technician recently, was asked to replace the bios battery in a laptop. The manufacturer said it was doable so I made my attempt...I never even got as far as the battery...I couldn't get the case completely off. Hahaha...putting it back together was even more fun.

    It'd be a good idea if the parts were standard, but they aren't...no where near it!

    --
    Derek Greene
  27. Its a nice idea, BUT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see this going the way that portable SPARCs did... although, that was a great idea, just too darn expensive.

    Somebody else said that a titanium iBook has a good feature set, and I'd have to agree - MASSIVE screen, and LONG battery life.

    Ofcourse, its bogged down with DVD drive, modem, sound, infra red and a whole load of other crap, but hey - it fits most of your needs.

    What would be really cool would be something like a MIPS or SPARC based laptop in the casing of a titanium iBook - purely for the screen size. Anybody else think that would rule?

  28. Sceptre by alen · · Score: 2

    Check out Sceptre . I remember reading a few years ago that they were the original oem for dell, quantex and a few other laptop makers. Can't confirm it though. I think PC Magazine even had a story about how Quantex and Dell Inspiron were essentially the same laptop with a few small differences.

    1. Re:Sceptre by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Hmm they do look like my Dell notebook that I am working on now, at least the housing is a very good match

    2. Re:Sceptre by robvasquez · · Score: 0

      There are only a few makers of laptops. They just get them branded, etc for other vendors.

  29. IBM Thinkpad 600 refurb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use IBM Thinkpad 600's. PII-266MHZ with 128 RAM 2MB video, refurbed units with extra 2year warranty can be had for $599.00. I get 5+ hours of battery and linux runs like a dream. I do use a PCMCIA dongless 10/100 net adapter (and they have the best screen you'll find in a laptop).

    Helluva lot cheaper than building one (it is almost impossible to build one, believe me I am a system builder.)

  30. Battery Life is the big issue by darrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Meches can find what he is looking for in just about any laptop produced today. So what if it comes loaded with more bells and whistles than a belly dancer...whipe it off and start over.

    Battery life of a week, on a system used for coding...I think that is a little far fetched. I have to agree with him on this point though. My COMPAQ (ewwww) 1200 barely has enough battery life to spend a week out of town checking email. Course...it is a Windows system.

    What is the average battery life most of you see?

    1. Re:Battery Life is the big issue by NWprobe · · Score: 1

      Linux in text mode is far nicer than widoze. I have a Dell latitude 266mhz. If I boot it up with windows, plug out the cdrom and floppy, I can go about 4 hours of MS-word/exel/winmine/etc.

      Running linux in text mode, I'll work easy for 8-12 hours. If I haven't seen a power outlet for 8 hours, I'm probably not using my pc anyway.

      --
      #find /dev/brain find: no such file or directory
    2. Re:Battery Life is the big issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my hp xh485 is terrible, 1 1/2 hours. of course, it is a beast of power.

  31. Re:Why? by ExMember · · Score: 1

    He added a three button mouse

    How did he do that? (Looking forward to voiding the warrenty on my brand-spanking new iBook)

  32. Rolling? by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    Please, don't call it 'Rolling' a laptop the same way you call it rolling a blunt. Let's not promote any more drugs. Drugs are bad, mmkay?

    1. Re:Rolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up

    2. Re:Rolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

    3. Re:Rolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right on, man! now if we only could get the speed limit-signs changed to something like 'velocity limit'. and home depot better also stop selling anything with 'weed' in its name.

    4. Re:Rolling? by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      Drugs are bad? Like caffeine? Or how about aspirin? Maybe you mean insulin? Hmmmmm, wait those are good if used correctly and bad if abused... How about we not promote stupidity? I will start now by replying to... well you get the idea.

      But then maybe not.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    5. Re:Rolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't mock a serious topic, that's nothing in common with what i said. What other connotation does 'rolling' have?

    6. Re:Rolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HERE HERE BROTHER!!! I SAY WE BRING BACK THE 1920's PROHIBITION OF ALCOHOL!!!

      OR BETTER YET STICK YOU AND YOUR INGNORANCE IN A TIME MACHINE AND SEND YOU TO THE 1920's...

    7. Re:Rolling? by mickey+knox · · Score: 1
      "Rolling your own " refers to the well done personal construction and design of an item. This came about as a result of a few "culturalisms":
      1. Rolling conceptually is movement oriented and closely associated with part of the holy grail of physics: perpetual motion.
      2. A sphere is considered by many cultures to be "perfect" and is the foundation for many traditions in cultures around the world associating with lack of termination. That's why a wedding ring is used in a marriage ceremony.
      3. Therefore, to "get something rolling" is to set it in motion with correct "perfect" design that will result in unending positive results. This has morphed through "dialectic shortening" (arguing well, shorter) into "rolling" a design.
      The reason its called rolling a blunt isn't because you need superior design or construction, its because you actually ROLL the blunt with ROLLING PAPER. Just because you decide to connect "rolling your own laptop" with drugs doesn't mean that the rest of us do.
      --
      Andrew 'Mickey Knox' Gearhart
    8. Re:Rolling? by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      Please, don't call it 'Rolling' a laptop the same way you call it rolling a blunt. Let's not promote any more drugs. Drugs are bad, mmkay?

      Aside from the obvious debatability of that last statement, the expression "roll yer own" predates the use of "blunt" by at least two generations, at least among white people. I do NOT know when machine-assembled (they're really not "rolled"), commercially-prepared cigarettes were introduced, but prior to that time _all_ cigarettes were constructed by rolling up bulk tobacco in special papers, generally by hand. The introduction of machine-assembled cigarettes quickly wiped this practice out for the 85%, with the exception of a few holdouts like my Grandfather. I remember he would sit in his Layzee-boy in front of the TV by the hour, rolling & smoking these homemade cigarettes despite the presence of perfectly good Lucky Strikes in his shirt pocket. YES, I'm SURE the filling inside them was brown, NOT the green stuff. His skill was incredible. He had a special pouch for the tobacco with a spring-loaded mouth that was just the right size to perfectly fill a rolling paper. He'd roll it back and forth in his fingers a bit, give it a lick on the edge and a quick twist, and have a nearly perfect cigarette every time. All I can figure is that the tobacco was cut into relatively long thin strips (about 1mm by 15) that leant themselves to easy rolling and had no tendancy to come out the ends (hence no twisting of the ends characteristic of a joint) You can still buy the bulk tobacco ("Have you got Prince Albert in a can? Well, you better let him out!") and this is, of course, the only _legal_ use for those little thin papers with the gummed edge.....

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  33. High End Linux Laptop by peterdaly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not quite the question, but I bet a great many people looking for a Linux laptop really do care about things like color.

    I am a developer who uses X and graphics tools. In my looking for a laptop had one priority: Screen resolution.

    I purchased a Dell C800. Currently I am staring at a 1600x1200 16 million color Mozilla window. Not only that, but how many CRT's can do that resultion well. With my LCD, not only is the screen crystal clear, but I still have room to have more things on the screen at one time than I can really pay attention to. For my application testing (jsp), I do my editing in full screen Netbeans, then minimize leaving two terminal windows, and a Mozilla window (or two) open. I use the two terminals for packaging and deploying the app for view in mozilla.

    I have had RedHat 7.1 and (now) 7.2 on the C800, and most things work fine. Only problems I have had is the video adapter doesn't support DGA (for direct VMWare screen access) and the internal modem (on a ethernet, 802.11b, modem combo card) did not work until RH 7.2. RH 7.2 detected the modem on the first after install boot. I have never used the wireless interface, so I'm not sure it that works.

    This is a great machine for the high end Linux user, I would buy it again for use with RedHat 7.2. (I have the 1Ghz version btw.)

    -Pete

    1. Re:High End Linux Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did yours come with a piece of shit ATI rage mobility?

      My c600 does, and ATI hasn't put out a driver for openGL.

      Btw, took me forever to figure this out, but redhat 7.2's newer kernel fixes some bugs with the dell laptop bios. 7.1's kernel had major problems recognizing alot of the dell hardware.

    2. Re:High End Linux Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HUH?? DRI (3d-acceleration, if you didn't know) support for the ATI r128 mobility is built into XFree86 4.0...

    3. Re:High End Linux Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong

      Go to dri.sourceforge.net
      there is no support for the r128 mobility.

      Most other ATI cards, but not the mobility.

      If you seriously got this to work, post your XConfig-4 file. I'm curious, becuase I really really really want this to work!

  34. Sony Picturebook comes really close. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Small, durable, and insanely long battery life (9 hours+ with quad capacity battery.) They're coming out with a new version that runs at 600Mhz and runs at 1280x600 native resolution.

  35. Simpsons by kruczkowski · · Score: 3, Funny

    This remind me of the Simpsons episode when Homer was hired to build a car...

    --
    hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    1. Re:Simpsons by sv0f · · Score: 3, Funny

      This remind me of the Simpsons episode when Homer was hired to build a car...

      Or that urban myth about that Finnish guy that built a Unix-like kernel from scratch. The chutzpah of these do-it-yourselfers!

    2. Re:Simpsons by markmoss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or that urban myth about that Finnish guy that built a Unix-like kernel from scratch. There's a considerable difference between rolling your own software and rolling your own hardware. It's called "tooling costs." If you design your own mobo to fit your own case, it will cost over $5,000 to get _one_ bare board built. (This assumes you managed to borrow the software needed to do such a design -- it costs $5,000 to $50,000 -- and ignores the fact that it takes several years of designing boards to get good enough to have any chance of a design like this working on the first try.) Adding the parts to that bare board by hand will take you several days, and probably cost a few thousand, since small quantity prices are much higher than buying parts by the reel. And some parts are only sold in reels of 1,000 pieces or more. Machine-shop charges for a custom case, $500 to 1,000, assuming you didn't make it too complicated. Etc.

      You could indeed use PC104 or another one of the standard bus families. You pay more for less performance, but you get good reliability since these cards are industrial grade. One issue is that your box will probably come out more cubical than lap-top shaped. Any of the rack-mounted systems are automatically at least 5 inches thick. PC104 cards are designed to stack one on top of the other, but if the clock speed is low it is possible to connect them side by side with ribbon cables. I'm not sure how low it has to be -- maybe 20MHz? But if you can live with that sort of performance, it would certainly help the battery life.

    3. Re:Simpsons by aozilla · · Score: 2

      There's a considerable difference between rolling your own software and rolling your own hardware.

      Only because we're no longer taught hardware as well as we're taught software. Woz was a smart guy, but he wasn't any more brilliant than the top software designers out there.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    4. Re:Simpsons by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Wrong. In software, when the engineering is done, the job is done. After you design hardware, you've also got to have it built, and if you're earning enough to be able to pay that out of your own pocket, you won't have the spare time to design your own laptop... I design, build, and program functional test fixtures, so I'm pretty experienced in hand-built single-copy electronics. Simply getting parts can be difficult for a solo worker; about 10% of all the parts made are available in small quantities at distributors like Digikey, for up to 10 times the large-quantity price, but for the rest, the only chance of getting just one is to persuade them to send you a free sample. Since I work in an electronics factory, I have two big advantages when it comes to parts procurement: thousands of kinds of parts are already in the plant on thousand-piece reels, and if I need something we don't have, I can generally get a free sample by, umm, not making it clear that this is a one-off project and big orders aren't going to follow if the part works out...

      So IF you don't care about size, weight, and speed, I can do a one-off build for 5 or 10 times as much as the unit cost in mass production, using off-the-shelf embedded controller PCB's (overpriced, but much cheaper than custom), wirewrapping whatever custom circuitry is needed, and buying a case that's more than big enough to hold it all. Sometimes that's $500 just for the case, because cases that big aren't exactly commodity items. (If you are good enough at metal-working, you can make your own case from about $100 in metal stock -- but people who have managed to learn this as well as electronics are pretty rare.) I can also layout a custom PCB, but I'm not good enough at layout to design a board that will work at 20MHz, or to compress even a 486-equivalent motherboard into laptop size. And to get a big, moderate-density, low-speed PCB made with good quality costs several thousand for the setup at the manufacturer. (There are etch-your-own-board kits, but with the quality I've seen coming out of these, I'd rather have good wirewrap.)

      we're no longer taught hardware as well as we're taught software. I'm not sure "no longer" is true, but it's certainly true that engineering schools are not teaching the real-world aspects of getting from a schematic to working hardware. On the other hand, I don't think it's practical to learn it all anymore. For instance, if you really want to learn board layout, (1) get a job on a production line for a while, (2) take the IPC classes (these are aimed more at draftsmen than engineers, but it's all that's available), and (3) go to work doing board layouts at some company that has the good sense to have someone with 10 years experience watching over you. By the time you finish this, you're going to be 5 years out of date in other areas. Most board designers don't go through anything like this, and it sure shows when we have to try to produce their lousy layouts... Likewise, most engineers drawing schematics or laying out boards are quite ignorant of test requirements, until they've had a dozen boards thrown back at them as impossible to test at production speeds...

    5. Re:Simpsons by aozilla · · Score: 1

      After you design hardware, you've also got to have it built, and if you're earning enough to be able to pay that out of your own pocket, you won't have the spare time to design your own laptop...

      I guess I implied that it was the same amount of work to build the two. What I was more getting at is that one isn't intrinsicly more difficult to understand than the other. Hardware is more expensive, but if you have the money for the parts it's just as simple as software. Woz may have spent more money than Linus, but I'm fairly certain they each could have done the other's job if they were interested in it.

      I'm not sure "no longer" is true, but it's certainly true that engineering schools are not teaching the real-world aspects of getting from a schematic to working hardware.

      I say "no longer" because I am under the impression that at one time there essentially was no software. Programming was done with a trusty soldering iron, and whatever you programmed was there pretty much forever.

      Perhaps we'll see the same thing with regard to low level programming languages, like C. We already are seeing it to a small extent with assembly. Personally I like to know what's going on from the top to the bottom before I write anything, but I certainly do see the benefit in not teaching all the details of the hardware to someone who's never going to see anything other than Visual Basic.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  36. 1 week battery life and integrated fast ethernet? by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Insanely long battery life. I don't mean 'barely survive the flight from NWK to LAX'. I mean 'I'm only going to be in Tokyo for a week, so I won't need the AC adapter.'"

    "Good built-in networking. No PCMCIA stuff, dongles, or other junk. The system should have a respected 100base-T card built in, and probably an 802.11b card and high-gain antenna as well."

    1 week battery life? I think you should invest in an international power adapter. And you don't want PCMCIA sockets, why not? What about expansion?

  37. Obsession with airports/planes? by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    I'm stuck in the coach section of a DC-9.

    I don't mean 'barely survive the flight from NWK to LAX'

    What's up with the obsession with airplanes? Don't you know that they don't allow you to use laptops on flights? ;-)

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Obsession with airports/planes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they allow you to use laptops on flights. Have you ever flown on anything larger than your brother's cock?

      Rneches' obsession with airplanes is quite simple. He's Islamic and has a few fantasies associated with them. Kind of like the fantasies you and I engaged in with Lego models, but then grew out of when we were 11. (Unlike a lot of the Slashdot reading faggots have).

      Sure, watch somebody moderate this honest opinion as a flamebait or troll. TRUTH HURT, FAGGOTS?

    2. Re:Obsession with airports/planes? by DrSpin · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the Taliban can extend his battery life by grounding him?

    3. Re:Obsession with airports/planes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all airlines. Some (particularly on international flights) totally ban them (and pretty much any electronic device, including CD walkmans, etc..)

  38. Emacs?!?! by chemguru · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    vi (vim) forever!!!!

    --
    --Chemguru
  39. RiscStation by mirko · · Score: 5, Informative

    > So, basically, I want a tough little

    > system with a StrongARM CPU, a flash

    > disk and grayscale 1024x768 LCD.

    > Insofar as I can tell, no one makes

    > such a thing.


    RiscStation is about to issue an ARM-Powered laptop...

    And RiscOS machines support ARMLinux or RiscBSD (even though I 'd advice you to just keep using RiscOS which is far more intuitive and performant on such platforms)...

    Anyway, the product is not ready yet but you may hear about it *very* soon.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:RiscStation by BeenaBerry · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the RISC OS on netBook ("Ron") project, either. Although it's not a 1024x768 screen, the Psion netBooks run on StrongARMS, are very rugged, and have insanely long battery life as requested. They support PCMCIA and CF cards. I'm surprised we haven't seen ARMLinux on them yet, or maybe there is...

    2. Re:RiscStation by mirko · · Score: 1

      Funny, I just submitted the related story...

      Hope they'll be interested as our Community really needs such interest! :-)

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:RiscStation by karmawarrior · · Score: 1

      Seems remarkably expensive for a machine that apparently runs at 10% of the speed of a low end Wintel system. (Yes, I know StrongARMs are fast, but they're not THAT fast, an 800MHz Cerelon will eat 10 60MHz such CPUs for breakfast. A laptop with the former is generally sub $1000 today, whereas this TBA laptop is going to be nearer the $2000 mark)

      (Which I think is a shame, I'd like to see a few non-Wintel systems out there that compete effectively like we had in the late eighties, but right now it looks like it's Apple and that's about it. Sun has a nice $1050ish desktop but no laptops to speak of. *sigh* Come back Commodore, Atari, all is forgiven....)

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
    4. Re:RiscStation by armb · · Score: 2

      Psion Series 7 might be relevent too.
      http://www.psion.com/series7/

      Linux on Psion information:
      http://linux-7110.sourceforge.net/distributions. sh tml#series7
      http://www.aleph1.co.uk/armlinux/pda/psion.html

      --
      rant
    5. Re:RiscStation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I guess this is cute and all, but why would I want to pay that much for a laptop when (a.) an Ipaq can eat it for lunch and (b.) I could get a perfectly good used 486 laptop for less that could also eat it for lunch?


      Come to think of it though, it would be neat to turn an IPaq into a laptop...

  40. ever here of tuxtops ? by eramm · · Score: 1
    hey dilbert !
    ever here of tuxtops ? how about the laptop howto ?

    btw 2 years ago i took a generic laptop (Twinhead Slimnote) and installed RH 6.2 w/ no hardware problems i am sure the latest
    RH versions support the hardware in the laptop of your choice.

    roll your own laptop ? re-invent the wheel ?

    eramm

  41. Retro-Fit and old laptop by Bocaj · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about retro fitting an old IBM thinkpad, for just this purpose. Remember, the old laptops had about the same battery life a current ones, but they used old NiCad technology. Strap a fat new NiMH or Lithium cell to that baby an it should run for quite a while. You might also try switching to a less processor intesive application like vi. :-) Since I still see a lot of the old thinkpads around, I'm inclined to say they are more durable, but don't quote me. Concreate is an indescriminat laptop killer...

    1. Re:Retro-Fit and old laptop by ndege · · Score: 1

      Concreate is an indescriminat laptop killer...

      I thought that was the graveity then the sudden stop. :)

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
  42. A shoe-box PC is easy enough by cobol4me · · Score: 1

    I was going to build a shoe-boxed size PC for myself using standard size mobo and drives, right-angle PCI arms and a wood box. My plan was to mount the mobo on the bottom and the drives on top.

    For a screen I would slap a 13" LCD on top to finish it off!

  43. OmniBook XP by linuxrunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously look into it. Made by Hewlett Packard. The OmniBook XP (or any variation of) works perfectly with linux. Resolution, screen size, harware detection, etc.

    I have successfully run both Linux Mandrake and Red Hat on it. (Even back to Red Hat 6.2!)

    I use a Xircom ethernet card, and that was detected by both with no effort.....
    Why build your own when you can easily buy one ready to go?

    Linuxrunner

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  44. So what's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with the present shipping laptops? Do you really dislike beefy processors? Just because Linux can run on a 486 doesn't mean that I want it to. I'd much rather have a beefy processor and "scads of nifty features", even if I don't use all of them, than an anemic piece of junk.

    If you want a great laptop, especially a great screen, try looking at the Dell Inspiron 7000. That's what I use, dual booted with Linux, and it works great. Also, the 15" screen is the best in all laptopdom. It ain't cheap but, that screen. Wow, that screen!

  45. Needs a port by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

    Well, for battery life, you could port Linux to this.

  46. Sony Vaio by imevil · · Score: 2, Informative

    I own a Sony Vaio (Superslim series, PGC-Z505), and it has nearly anything you're looking for. It really lacks in battery life time. 2hrs if you VI on it. But you can buy a "6hrs" battery, that means you can VI on it for 6 hrs. And then you'll still have the 2hrs battery shipped by default... well I guess you could fill in your suitcase with batteries. Other thing that sucks is 64MB of RAM. But I don't really notice it with Linux (but default OS: WinME aghhhhh...).

    I installed a Debian on it with NO problem, even if I had no CD rom, not even an external one. Builtin networking is enough - quite good, not a 3com but having in my home network with just 3coms and a kickass switch the Vaio integrated well.

    It is small (letter paper sized x 1inch) and light (3lbs maybe), but has a max res of 1024x768 (there are some smaller ones which only have 600x800). Didn't get the modem working.

    And I find it really nice. That's also a reason I bought it, but I don't think you actually care.

    But if you really want to build your own... well, if you have the money to buy the parts and the patience to put it all together I think it will be at least a very instructive activity and you'll learn a lot from it. I'd like to hear of the result.

    1. Re:Sony Vaio by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Yeah. I have a z505le....

      What a horrible purchase.
      Oh sure.. I like my tiny little laptop.. but in hindsight.

      1) Sony support sucks ass. They REFUSED To sell me a new keyboard, as it's not 'user-replacable' (but you have to take it out to replace the user-replacable ram.. hmm)
      2) They said that I had to send it to LA to get the keyboard replaced, and that they would re-format the laptop and re-install from the recovery disks to test that it works. There was no way around this.
      Luckily.. I fixed it myself.

      Linux.. linux went in okay..but I have to say, having the BIOS only boot from Sony's CD Rom is a major pain in the ass when upgrading.

      I will never buy another sony again.

    2. Re:Sony Vaio by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      The keyboard issue is stupid, but that's Sony. If you specifically request not to format the drive, they will not do it. Other cdroms can work, but will require a boot floppy and the usb floppy drive.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  47. Rugged Laptops by Heem · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may want to check out CyberResearch they have alot of NEMA-12 and NEMA-4 Compliant 'portables' that may suit your needs. They have ALOT of other interesting equipment as well. I used to work for them - they are a very reputable company, and although the stuff they sell is on the pricey side, its well worth it.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
  48. Re:1 week battery life and integrated fast etherne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or how about a REAL long power cord.

  49. Not So Laptop by Aeris+the+wired · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Being a hopelessly addicted computer user, and a college student 147 miles from home, I've often brought everything -- My 15" monitor, keyboard, mouse, and the tower. It's quite a lot to bring, so when I built my new box, portability was the key.

    Here's the base unit:
    http://www.ecs.com.tw/products/bookpc2.htm

    It's small, compact, and fits in the large pocket of my schoolbag nicely. It currently has a 933 Pentium III, 256 mb of memory, and a 40 mb HD. It's dual-booted with Win98 and Mandrake Linux 8.1

    I also use a special keyboard:
    http://www.dnrtechs.com/foldable.html

    I feels a bit strange at first, but it's not all the difficult to et used to -- even for everyday use.

    Finally, I have a logitech optical mouse. I don't have a LCD monitor yet, I'm hoping to find a thin 15".

    --

    "Software is a feeling, refined and expanded by each who touch it."
    -Solstice
    Solstice@deninet.com

    1. Re:Not So Laptop by alleria · · Score: 1

      I bought one of these foldable keyboards from Plycon also for space saving issues, but it is absolutely terrible.

      There's a sleep button on it that you accidentally hit, the insert/delete/home/end/pgup/pgdn keys are shifted one row lower than normal, as are the printscreen/break keys, such that you keep fumbling.

      The space bar is broken up into multiple chunks for foldability, as is the left shift.

      Worst part: feels like typing on very soft rubber. No tactile feedback whatsoever, and you have to hit the keys with serious power to get them to register (and sometimes not even then!)

      The IBM PCJr gum key keyboards are lightyears ahead of these foldables in terms of real-world usability.

    2. Re:Not So Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.ecs.com.tw does not exist. Please reboot.

    3. Re:Not So Laptop by shibboleth · · Score: 1

      The keyboard he mentioned is more rollable than foldable (despite the url) and it's from DNR Enterprises Inc. I don't see Plycon mentioned.
      (And it's $30.)

      The link, once again.

      --
      "Be thankful you are not my student. You would not get a high grade for such a design :-)" - Minix pro
    4. Re:Not So Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same keyboard. In exactly that link, you can see a photo of the space bar broken into two separate buttons (lower left-hand corner), as I mentioned. Any questions?

    5. Re:Not So Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $host www.ecs.com.tw
      www.ecs.com.tw is a nickname for web.ecs.com.tw
      web.ecs.com.tw has address 203.66.106.246

  50. Re:1 week battery life and integrated fast etherne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Erm...did you read the original post at all? He is specifically looking to *not* expand his laptop, presumably because he doesn't care. Moreover, as unrealistic as it sounds, he doesn't want to worry about power adapters. <BR>
    <BR>
    It's like I said, "Hey, I really want pancakes for breakfast!", and you replied with, "Pancakes? What about scrambled eggs? And how about some toast with them?" Bah.

  51. What about... by SKicker · · Score: 2

    .. a Psion 5mx.

    It runs linux, although its not particularly complete yet. There has been major development on the 5mx recently though and hopefully it should get to a good state soon.

    OK maybe not the size of thing you want but its 36Mhz ARM, 16Mb RAM, compact flash disk, backlit greyscale 640x240 screen, goes 8 hours on 2 AAs and you can carry it in your pocket (just about).

    The machines are cheap second hand now since psion have gone tits up but you better be quick before they disappear. Get a big CF disk and you can have a full debian-arm distribution on it.

    look here for the linux on psion files

    If you want something bigger, how about the netbook? 32Mb, 206Mhz ARM etc. This runs linux too but im not sure at what level of completeness.

    Its a shame psion have stopped making these machines, as technically theyre very nice.

    1. Re:What about... by funky+womble · · Score: 1
      Netbooks are still listed here. This link suggests that IBM may produce a Linux port. Since they use flash instead of hard-drive, the distribution would have to be limited. Though, perhaps emacs can be ported to run natively under EPOC32 (or perhaps it already has..)

      Whatever, losing the HD is one excellent way to cut battery consumption to the minimum (on whatever type of machine you use). Boot from flash and use a ramdrive for temp storage if you need it... I wonder if any laptop BIOS supports booting from flash on PCMCIA or if you'd need flash which can attach to IDE (used in conjunction with a 3.5"-2.5" IDE converter and placed in the drive bay....assuming it fits :)

  52. Re:Why? by CokeBear · · Score: 2

    Probably by plugging it into the USB port.
    (Just a guess)

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
  53. Distro... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1, Interesting
    since so many of us have issues getting Linux up on laptops

    Well, I have a 5 year old Toshiba, and the disto I use (older laptop, small harddisk) is Peanut Linux . Everything works, XFree86, sound, network PCMCIA card and modem PCMCIA card. Give it a try. I ditched KOffice and parts of KDE2 (well, most of it, not everything) because it's too heavy for my laptop, but with WindowMaker it works fine.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  54. Not a week, but Linux gives better battery life. by TBC · · Score: 1

    I first installed Linux on an old Sager-Middern laptop (233MHz, 128MB Ram) and my battery life went from ~2 hours to 8+ hours. I am a "power-user" in that I normally have from 3 to 8 applications open at one time. Windows just sucked the battery dry. Linux seems to handle the large number of applications much better. Even with significant swapping going on. On top of that, you should see the looks I get when I "surf the web" from 35,000 feet.

  55. Or a biscuit PC...even better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This poster has obviously never heard of the Biscuit PC form factor. Much cheaper and easier...not to mention many times smaller.
    Buy a Biscuit, d00d. They rock!

  56. iBook by phloda · · Score: 1

    Nevermind the Mac part, think: *durable, *good keyboard, *smooth trackpad, *3 standard NICs (modem, 10BT, 802.11b), *your choice of *nix distros, *running mad gui BSD distro outta the box, *primo battery life, *space-saving tack-sharp LCD, *VGA or RCA video out, *Different. Okay, okay, it's missing a second mouse button, but if you're in emacs all day long, it isn't like you'll miss that. Go down to Fry's Microcenter, where ever, and open up the terminal app and look around the guts. It's all there.

    1. Re:iBook by jakob_grimm · · Score: 1

      Mod this up. Just bought one myself, and I love it. (4.9 lbs.!) I got mine with a .edu discount for $1099. Never owned a Mac before, but with OSX (or just Darwin, Yellow Dog, etc. for this guy) it's a great machine.

      --

      "No prints can come from fingers / If machines become our hands." -- Jack Johnson

  57. Rolling Your Own World Order by hexx · · Score: 2

    I've been looking around for a friendly world order, and I've found a couple of reasonable approximations. However, there really aren't any "peace, love, and sex communes" out there that really meet the needs of a person looking to live in a blissful, peaceful world. In particular, most areas of the world are, more or less, filthy criminal cesspools. As such, they are loaded with scads of seedy prostitutes, beefy murderers, and so forth. This is great, I suppose, if you are running Windows or MacOS (sorry, had to). If you're a philosophical megalomaniac human, and spend most of your time wondering how you can come to rule the world, (er, create world peace), most of that criminal activity is more of a liability than an asset. In other words, I'm talking about religious zealots, current governments and other hackers more than I'm talking about the 'average person'. In short, hexx is looking to find a way to DO THE IMPOSSIBLE, and if the platform doesn't exist to be able to do this, he's looking for help in creating one. Interested?

  58. IBM ThinkPAD A21p series by hackus · · Score: 1

    Hands down the best laptop to run Linux on.

    Enourmous 15 inch display, ATI high speed 3D to make those MESA OpenGL video extensions scream on X and a very rugged design.

    Plus IBM's warranty which is the best in the business.

    Although, it did set me back $4200 bucks when I bought it, but if you want a machine to do Oracle, Java, Linux and network development/troubleshooting it canb't be beat.

    -hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:IBM ThinkPAD A21p series by dossen · · Score: 1

      I'm think the Dell Inspiron 8100 looks even nicer... GeForce2 Go.... Any experiences??

    2. Re:IBM ThinkPAD A21p series by Darth+Turbogeek · · Score: 1

      Yep, using a 8100 now. Power hungry, heavy, but I wouldnt swap it for anything else. The screen is sooooooo nice. And it has everything onboard, plus it's about the fastest laptoip availible right now.

      Only issue I've ever had was shoddy video drivers. Apart from that, I've had no need to run a desktop and I'm seriously considering just not having one.

      One seriously awesome machine

      --
      "Old Rallydrivers never die - they just fail to book in on time"
    3. Re:IBM ThinkPAD A21p series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 110%. Bought mine 6 months ago for just over 2k, off the "IBM-authorized auctions" on ebay. What a beautiful laptop. Everything works great in Linux. (My laptop DOES have a built-in win-modem, but it is supported by the Lucent drivers) You KNOW IBM developed this with geeks in mind -- it doesn't have any windows keys!
      The 15" 1600x1200 LCD display is just so sweet...
      I must say that I have been **very** satisfied with this laptop.
      The battery life is maybe... 3 or 4 hours?
      It's true, this is certainly one of the larger laptops out there today. But I *like* my laptop to be big and powerful, because for me my latop isn't just a latop, it is also a desktop replacement.
      FBcon running at 1600x1200 on this laptop just looks so nice...

  59. think outside the box... by neilv · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...literally. one of the other comments centered on how difficult it is to build laptops, which is true - that's why they cost more.

    but what is a laptop, after all? it's a portable computing device. You can buy really tiny computers, such as tiqit or pocket pc (many slashdot articles on these) :


    add a fold-up keyboard, and a 5G PCMCIA drive


    And a display device, either a portable screen (there are wireless screens out there) or glasses:



    and you've got a really small computer. There are also a couple articles I've seen on building a "laptop" into a small stainless steel or brushed aluminum brief case.

    Obviously, designing a motherboard and integrating everthing into a nifty case would be nice, but that's where the cost comes in. Buying really small parts isn't cheap, but building your own thang never is. But you *can* build a really small, portable computer, pretty much tailored to your needs.

    You might also consider (if you really want to go for the gusto) the new technology that lets you output circuits via a printer (which thus far has been used to create cell phones and batteries):


    but I see no reason you couln't print custom PC's! In short, although it may not be cheaper, it is I think possible to build something small, light, portable, and tailored to your design. And if you do, could you send me one?

    cheers,

    neil
    neil@dove-tail.com
  60. Just doing text mode and admin stuff? by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

    Do what I do... Toshiba Portege 7020CT with Windows 2000 and a telnet session. Works great and I can still play my DVD's. Rolling your own laptop isn't going to be cheap.

    You might be able to find an RDI Powerlite laptop however. These were based on the Sun Micro-Sparc and had built in ethernet, SCSI-2, TGX graphics and a 800x600 active matrix TFT screen. I have seen them on eBay for $200-300.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  61. I want one! Me too! Let's do it! by RudeDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been wanting exactly what you are talking about for at least 6 years now. I've been looking for off-the-shelf because I've felt that I didn't quite know enough about hardware to build one and really don't have the time. A few years ago when Sun was talking about Java chips that could natively handle the language and perhaps it's own OS I thought they might head this direction with some hardware... but alas.

    There are certainly enough (net|sys)admins out there to support a 'community' for this effort. After all this hardware setup is perfect for us at work or on the road. (Even at work we are away from our desks at racks of computers or in foreign data centers!) My company (Steem) will gladly step up the web resources , maybe even hardware purchasing if we could begin producing something 'sell'able. I would even venture to guess that ThinkGeek would support the endevour on some level.

    I'll keep an eye on this story and see what develops. Obviously the more off-the-shelf (COTS as the gov businesses call it) stuff we can find the better. I have looked at the PC104 hardware and it seems do-able but we'll need to work at getting all the other pieces together.

    BTW, if you haven't read through the MIT wearable web pages or wearables central, I suggest that you should. Lots of good hardware suggestions there.

    --
    RudeDude
    Perl/Linux/PHP hacker
  62. Not a laptop, but... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    Have you considered a shoulder-top instead?

    1. Re:Not a laptop, but... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Now I've seen the dumbest thing that could ever be seen. Thanks for the link.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  63. I had this problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My solution was to buy a Powerbook G4. This gives me a few options. First of all, it comes with Apple*NIX pre-installed. I got rootless X11 running and I can now run XEmacs with aplomb.

    Now, supposing I decided I don't like OS X (I like it fine so far, but I haven't messed with it that much), well, then I can switch to Yellow Dog Linux, which is a Linux distribution designed specifically for Macs. Since they concentrate on one individual vendor, their compatibility should be pretty good. (I'm surprised there isn't an IBM Linux distribution out there.)

    This is not to say that building a laptop from scratch isn't an interesting idea, but I wouldn't be able to do it myself, so I figured I'd come up with an alternative.

  64. How to take apart a laptop by iBod · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Grow your fingernails!

    I know this sounds seriously wierd, but it's relatively easy to take apart a laptop shell without damaging it by easing your fingernails into the joins between the mouldings and prying them apart, popping in those little moulded snap locks as you work around the case. Using screwdrivers etc. to lever apart the case will almost certainly scratch, deform and generally mess up the mouldings.

    If you don't have custom tooling, a strong set of fingernails can often do the job safely, and If you're not too much of a geek, you can even clean under them!

    1. Re:How to take apart a laptop by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      Bwahahaha! that's probably true! Unfortunately,my GF at the time didn't think to highly of a guy with long finger nails...not to mention t
      hey get in the way of my guitar playing! :-)

      --
      Derek Greene
    2. Re:How to take apart a laptop by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      How exactly would long fingernails get in the way of playing air guitar to 'Stairway to Heaven'?

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
  65. Laptop which works well with Linux. by Proteus+Child · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of partial to my Dell Latitude CP (model M233SD). Everything works on it as far as I know (though I'm having a bit of touble getting sound working under the v2.4 series Linux kernel - it works perfectly under v2.2). If you can find one on eBay, snag it (and get a memory upgrade while you're at it - they can use up to 128MB of RAM, just so you know.)

    --

    Proteus' Child

    Doko ni datte; hito wa, tsunagette iru.

    1. Re:Laptop which works well with Linux. by genetik · · Score: 1
      yes, i agree. i have a Dell Latitude CP with FreeBSD on it and everything works great. i end up using it as much as, if not more than my desktop boxen.

      battery life is about 4-5 hours with the brightness at medium (i got it used and i don't think the battery is up to par). anyways, if you don't have the money for a brand new laptop, i'd suggest finding a latitude CP on ebay.

      -brian

  66. Add-ons to existing hand-helds by Phoukka · · Score: 1

    As another commenter pointed out, look at existing handhelds. It seems to me that what you want is a more-or-less fullsize keyboard and screen for something like the new Sharp Zaurus Linux PDA. So, instead of going nuts trying to build a laptop from scratch (neat idea, but WAY impractical IMHO), try finding or building or commissioning an expansion part: an adapter to whatever expansion slots exist on the Sharp or iPaq, which provides a USB controller and 2 ports (keyboard and mouse), and provides some sort of basic video out. As an alternative, a new cradle that has a built-in keyboard, trackpad, LCD screen and Ethernet port. Let the cradle have its own built-in battery (I hear fuel-cell technology is up-and-coming), and there you go. Add extra storage to taste (flash?), and you would really have something.

    In fact, I'd buy something like that in a heart-beat. In all honesty, a gadget like this, truly well-designed and built, would make a good Linux-based hand-held into a truly killer device. Laptop manufacturers would be running scared!

  67. iBook is the answer. by CokeBear · · Score: 5, Informative

    "From a laptop, I want five things:

    * A nice, clear screen. Color is nice, but not critical. It should be big enough so that looking at it doesn't make me feel like I'm stuck in the coach section of a DC-9.


    iBook: SuperCrisp 1024x768 screen. Don't want color? Just turn it off.

    * Decent 2D video performance. I might just be editing text, but at least it should look good while doing it. In any event, with decent a framebuffer and hardware acceleration, I can use nice anti-aliases fonts and play around with the window settings. This might sound frivolous, but nice-looking text and windows go a long, long way to relive eyestrain, which is exceedingly important.

    iBook: Check.

    * Good physical utility. Too many laptops seem to be designed to sit on your desk, with the occasional trip to some other desk (transported in a deluxe, custom leather briefcase). This is OK if you are, say, the CEO, and don't do any real work in the first place. I want a laptop that is durable, light and small. I don't want to have to transport it in a special bag, or worry about fragile bits getting broken from normal use.

    The current crop of iBooks is rugged. I've dropped mine a few times (oops). Not a scratch, no problem. And unlike the PowerBook, it *feels* rugged. I am confident that it could withstand the abuse that I dish out.

    * Insanely long battery life. I don't mean 'barely survive the flight from NWK to LAX'. I mean 'I'm only going to be in Tokyo for a week, so I won't need the AC adapter.'

    This is the only place I can't help you, except to say that if you aren't using processor intensive tasks or the CD drive, you will get 5 hours (maybe more). Get a few extra batteries and an international adapter if you are going to Tokyo. (Don't they have the same power plugs there as here?)
    Also, the adapter that comes with the newest iBooks is very compact and lightweight. Cord wraps around it easily.

    * Good built-in networking. No PCMCIA stuff, dongles, or other junk. The system should have a respected 100base-T card built in, and probably an 802.11b card and high-gain antenna as well.

    iBook has 100BaseT, and with an AirPort Card, you're all set. And there is no PCMCIA. (If you want that, you want a PowerBook). The antenna is very good, much better than the PowerBook. (Up to 300 feet in some cases)

    See other posts for good reasons why you don't want to build a laptop, but value for dollar, an entry level iBook can't be beat.
    Pick one up at your local Apple Store or on the web.
    Good Luck

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
    1. Re:iBook is the answer. by TTop · · Score: 1

      I'll second that on the iBook. I picked one up this summer and really dig OS X -- and I've never owned a mac before.

      And plus an open-source BSD variant (well at least the darwin part) is pre-installed! Really, it's too cool to have a laptop with unix, a beautiful gui, and lots of free tools pre-installed (think Perl, Emacs, SSH, gcc, etc...). Not only that, you can install an xFree86 -- I'm now running the Gimp on my iBook! With all that going for it, I can't really see wanting to run Linux on it... OSX has is the new OS of choice as far as I'm concerned.

      All this plus what the guy above mentioned... life is sweet! I don't regret my purchase for a moment.

    2. Re:iBook is the answer. by Lord+Kenja · · Score: 1

      Right. And he wanted Linux or BSD...

      No problem. Don't want Mac OS X with it's GUI. Do one of two things:

      Type >console at the login prompt and you get full screen terminal access (after you login at the new prompt)

      OR. Just install Darwin instead. Not exactly Open or NetBSD. But it's pretty close.

      Well. Perhaps one of the PPC Linux distributions even works on iBook. Donno.

    3. Re:iBook is the answer. by maxphunk · · Score: 3, Informative

      * Insanely long battery life. I don't mean 'barely survive the flight from NWK to LAX'. I mean 'I'm only going to be in Tokyo for a week, so I won't need the AC adapter.'

      This is the only place I can't help you, except to say that if you aren't using processor intensive tasks or the CD drive, you will get 5 hours (maybe more). Get a few extra batteries and an international adapter if you are going to Tokyo. (Don't they have the same power plugs there as here?) Also, the adapter that comes with the newest iBooks is very compact and lightweight. Cord wraps around it easily.


      As far as a can remember, Apple has always had universal power supplies in its portables. Basicly that means that in another country all you need is a different plug, not a voltage adapter. I think this goes back to the Duo series...

      --

      "The chief enemy of creativity is 'good taste'" -Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:iBook is the answer. by Gen.+Ho+Lee+Phuc · · Score: 1

      yes, linux runs on the ibook. It has ever since the first revision of the hardware in 1999

    5. Re:iBook is the answer. by xueexueg · · Score: 1
      I second that.

      I just got back from a week in Rome. I brought my iBook (running debian-powerpc (Sid), plus one extra battery, and the awesome "Road Warrior" travel plug adapter made by some Japanese company. I never had to use my spare battery: I just charged the first battery at night in the hotel. I took the iBook with me to internet cafes, begged (in vain) to connect to their networks, and answered some of my enormous email backlog when I had spare moments. On the plane there and back I also used it as much as my flagging attention would allow (KLM hottie flight attendants consuming the rest of my attention) and although I came close to having to change the battery, I decided to take a nap rather than work further.

      Yes, the battery life could have been longer. In MacOS I understand it is. But I got plenty of value out of my experience -- and if I'd found any friendly hackers in Rome I would have been able to do the network thing. Anybody know any Roman internet cafes that will let you plug in to their network?

    6. Re:iBook is the answer. by tfrayner · · Score: 1

      Might I recommend Yellow Dog Linux? Version 2.0 supported the 2001 iBook and is one of the most advanced Linux distros available for ppc (comparable tto Slackware 8.0, IMHO; incidentally, I am not associated with this company)

      --
      The best newspaper in the USA: the Anderson Valley Advertiser.
    7. Re:iBook is the answer. by Stacdaed · · Score: 1

      * Insanely long battery life. I don't mean 'barely survive the flight from NWK to LAX'. I mean 'I'm only going to be in Tokyo for a week, so I won't need the AC adapter.'

      This is the only place I can't help you, except to say that if you aren't using processor intensive tasks or the CD drive, you will get 5 hours (maybe more). Get a few extra batteries and an international adapter if you are going to Tokyo. (Don't they have the same power plugs there as here?)
      Also, the adapter that comes with the newest iBooks is very compact and lightweight. Cord wraps around it easily.


      IBM used to sell quad capacity lithum/ion battery's. But they cost a LOT! (sorry I don't have a link)
      If you could ether use that or find something similar for the ibook, it'd work.
  68. Penguin in my pants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run linux on my laptop that my company gave me... its a Dell Inspiron 3000, and it runs great... why would you want to spend the next 5 years building a lappie? if it works, dont complain... ;)

  69. Well what I use. by Yaruar · · Score: 1

    Battery life is an issue due to the age, but I use an old tosh Tecra XCDT PII machine, installed redhat and I can do graphics editing at 1024x768 quite happily and cost me absolutely nothing to buy as work threw it out....

    --
    Working for the (other) man
  70. battery life,size, programming. by gTsiros · · Score: 0

    Get a hp48gx. 4Mhz cpu. Has a complete suite for asm/sysRPL developing, a 131x64 mono lcd, fits in your pocket (barely even if you have large pockets, though) the batteries last for MONTHS, it has two pcmcia-like card slots for memory (up to 4M, standardd=128K) or, if you got the balls, custom hardware, and hundreds of apps (www.hpcalc.org). Now if some freak can make a network card for that thing...Oh yeah, IR (can barely do irDA) and rs232 cable. can do 9600bps but recent hacks allow it to go above 56K.

    you will probably never going to find something sturdier, with the exception of a caterpillar 10ton truck.

    Development has stopped since years, we are afraid _production_ has stopped too, get while you can.

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
  71. Not a good idea by The+Pim · · Score: 2
    Take a look at your typical consumer laptop. About a foot by a foot by an inch or two: a rectangular prism, to a close approximation. Sure, some are more rounded than others (think iBook), but it's still a fundamentally square shape.

    Now, think about how often you've damaged a laptop in minor accidents. Even in a case, a short fall is likely to require a trip to the shop. The durability on these things is hardly industrial grade.

    Rolling one is just asking for trouble.

    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
  72. those who can't do, roll thier own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Doesn't sound like brother rneches could roll his own Doobie much less a laptop.

  73. The Ultimate Laptop by valmont · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get an Apple Titanium PowerBook running MACOS 10.1. Get the developer tools CD which installs all kinds of nifty stuff, gcc, cvs, project builder. And you're set to go. It's all bsd unix, you can open terminal and console windows and have full access to your system via shells.

    MACOS 10.1 is the best thing to ever happen to computing and is the ultimate geek's operating system, and is also the best operating system you can ever run on a laptop.

    Its networking configuration is very easily configurable and nicely abstracted behind a very nice interface. Check this:

    1) At work, i am connected to the 'net via corporate LAN thru my ethernet port and static tcp/ip configuration.

    2) At home, i have a dsl connection and multiple computers, all sharing the connection via a LinkSys DSL router, with DHCP enabled, and an Apple airport base station acting as a bridge to the rest of my ethernet LAN.

    3) At my girlfriend's place, she just has a simple phone line and I can connect via dial-up only.

    ==> I work during the day as a web applications developer, and run the NetBeans java IDE on OS 10.1 which comes pre-installed with Java 1.3, while listening to mp3's with i-tunes, with 10 terminal windows opened with multiple ssh connections to various hosts, using shell scripts i wrote to manage files, quickly edit files with emacs, do complex file search and replaces in BBEdit. I also have my DVD player idling with my crouching tiger hidden dragon DVD just sitting there waiting to be watched during my lunch break.

    Work day is over. I unplug the laptop's ethernet jack, unplug my desktop speakers and the power cord, drive home.

    As soon as i get home, i open the laptop. This instantly wakes it up from sleep. It instantly detects that I am not using my ethernet port, but it also detects that there is an open wireless network at my home. It hops on it right away. Then automatically makes the DHCP request as I had configured to. BAM: I get home, I wake up my laptop, and it's connected to the net via its airport card.

    Say I wanna go to my Girl's place rite now and check my e-mail from there. Put the laptop on 'sleep', get there, plug her phone jack into my modem port, and click the little modem icon on my status bar and select "connect". And there i am. Easy.

    I recently downloaded, compiled and configured the standard samba daemon distro by passing a few flags to the configure script. OS 10.1 already comes with a couple samba clients built-in via command-line and is also handled at the URL/protocol level, but not samba SERVER. So that lets me share drives with windoz weinies, while i already had the built-in ability to share drives two-ways with AppleTalk clients and unix/linux NFS clients, via standard unix command-line as well as a couple GUI tools.

    It really doesn't get any sweeter than this. Wether you are just getting your feet wet into Unix, or you only work in vi/emacs and swear by terminal and console windows, this puppy has everything you need to get your stuff done and your jollies off.

    I guarantee you, there is absolutely NO cooler operating system than OS 10.1. They've still got improvements to make, and it's still unofficially considered 'betaware', but hey, I've been using it very intensively for weeks now, and it hasn't failed me. and the titanium powerbook with its wide screen and pretty colors and all its connectivity stuff is just way cool.

    1. Re:The Ultimate Laptop by dizzyPhoenix · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that it looks amazingly cool as well ;-)

    2. Re:The Ultimate Laptop by valmont · · Score: 2


      OH YAH true, it truly does look amazingly cool. Both the TiBook and OS 10.1's "Aqua" GUI.

      I really like the Dock too. To me it serves 2 functionalities:

      1) the stuff i use often is always right there for me to click on.

      2) it allows me to establish a little routine of icons to click on when i start my work day. Depending on what kind of work day it is, i glance my way from the left to the right, and will skip the Snak IRC, iTunes and DVD player icons if i'm starting a hectic day, and right away launch microsoft entourage, omniweb, terminal, and BBEdit.

      Since the TiBook screen is *SO WIDE*, i made my "Dock" panel smaller in my system preferences (it comes defaulted with HUGE icon sizes, HEH), and i can easily have my 17 permanent icons sit there, with room to spare to the right for 5 temporarily docked icons of terminal windows with tail -f's of web application server logs, ssh connection to remote cvs server, ssh connection to my home linux box and an ssh connection to my personal email/everything shell account.

      heh. and then i have a crap load of other term windows opened, two fit side by side with ample room to spare.

      and then browser windows. two side by side do squeeze. kinda tight though. that's pushing it.

      ok i'll stop now :)

    3. Re:The Ultimate Laptop by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      This is not a flame. Honestly. I just want to see how good macos 10 is and whether it can justify buying a mac.

      But what, from what you described, is there that your mac can do and a winxp/win2k running on a recent dell laptop can't?

      Let's see. Automatic network configuration in multiple environments, including modem, 100baseT, 802.11, auto-config - check.

      Most of your favorite command-line utils - check (Cygwin, although parts of it are bastardized, I admit). For the rest, set up X-forwarding using xwin32 or a number of other X servers and connect to your local Unix server. Many essential IDE tools like Emacs, gcc, various java tools, already run on win32.

      Cuteness - check for winxp, or at least there will be. Luna looks like crap (except for the taskbar), but hopefully we'll see some extreme cuteness once the themes community gets rolling.

      If we could just refrain from the religious/monopoly/bully arguments and view the systems based on their technical merits alone, how else is macosx better?

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    4. Re:The Ultimate Laptop by valmont · · Score: 3, Informative


      Well for one OS X, is BSD unix at its core. You're not talking about a younger operating system like windows or traditional macos to which we grafted UNIX-like features like cygwin.

      You're talking about a *true* unix at the core of the operating system, interacting with well-defined hardware, with all peripherals already working. All user-friendliness shortcomings of traditional unices have been taken care of in a very friendly GUI, "Aqua".

      If you do not use the "classic environment" which insures compatibility with legacy applications, this thing flies.

      You're looking at a fare more secure and high-performance operating system than windoz.

      Plus, OS X being a BSD variant, you benefit from all the open-source servers and applications. This is why I was able to install the samba daemon to allow PC's to mount shares from my laptop, by simply downloading the standard samba distro and passing a few extra parameters. What does this mean?

      AppleTalk clients can mount shares from my laptop.
      Unix NFS clients can mount shares from my laptop.
      PC Samba clients can mount shares from my laptop.

      All of which can simply be, the laptop's ~user home directories. You can set permissions within your home folder that can be reflected accross all those network services.

      That's one example.

      But really. Your question is just like asking me to compare the advantages of running a true unix with a friendly interface on a laptop versus windows.

      Arguments can be made in favor of either operating system. However, in that guy's case, he seemed to be strongly inclined to run a BSD variant on his laptop, which means he seems to be the most comfortable with a unix variant, so the OS X solution seems to make more sense for him. Now you might want to try to convince him to not use unix at all.

  74. They are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for Quantex and they are the exact same laptops as the dells with a different sticker on them.

  75. would there be a market?... by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    If I actually did go out and build my own laptop, do you think there would be enough general interest to get a community together? Maybe even start a little company to sell pc104 compatible laptop shells and the various adapters, trackpads, keyboards and other doodads that people would need?


    Hell Yes! Look at the market for home-brew PCs. My guess is that most people in that market are like me and would love to be able to build a laptop with the features important to us, at a more reasonable price than a new laptop. I've been daydreaming about being able to buy the parts and roll my own laptop for at least a decade.

    An existing example is the Palm market... there are many small companies that specialize in selling hacker hardware to replace Palm cases, buttons, and also sell new screens, memory chips, etc... I could definitely see it being viable for X86 portable gear too.

  76. Crusoe anyone? by BurkeChowdah · · Score: 1

    Any of the crusoe laptops would work. The Sony Picturebook and the Fujistu Lifebook P series (I think) are based on the crusoe laptop. They definitely aren't easy on the pocketbook, but they are the closest thing to what you are looking for. Having a battery that will last a week is about 687 miles on the other side of a pipe dream, but the Crusoe laptops, with the larger battery, will last up to 20 hours. This is nothing short of herculean for a laptop. These also do not include all of the frills that you mentioned. Just about ideal, based on what you mentioned....

    [include -something witty]

    --
    (insert attempt to be witty here)
  77. Ruggedize it... by Whomever · · Score: 1


    If you're going to the trouble to make a custom laptop, you should ruggedize it. It would be easier to modify a ruggedized briefcase than to get someone to fabricate a custom plastic case. And, it would look a whole lot cooler.

    See the Halli Mac. This laptop modification was here on Slashdot back in August.

    --


    ----------
    perl -e 'print(pack("H*","646176652e7761676e657240676d6169 6c2e636f6d0a"));'
  78. got link ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /me == lazy

  79. Confolio by jockm · · Score: 1

    Toshiba did make a nice StrongARM laptop called the Confolio (I kid you not). It was a mobile network computer, and ran a untetherd version of JavaOS. I have one in my closet, I keep hoping that the ARM Linux guys will make a port to it, or that one day I might actually have time to do it myself...

    --

    What do you know I wrote a novel
    1. Re:Confolio by gaudior · · Score: 1
      You mis-spelled the word. It's Cornholio

  80. thankfully it has never taken off ... by v0Rt3x · · Score: 1

    If buying laptops components was anything like buying the components to put together a PC then we would be stuck with bulky beige laptops for life.... PC case design has only gotten worse over the years .. I am glad this never happened in the laptop world.

    So go a buy a nice Ti Thinkpad .. or a Sony Viao, or even a pretty little iBook and remember that style counts.

  81. Battery Life by eAndroid · · Score: 1

    Your OS has a lot to do with what kind of battery life you'll get. Especially when it comes to things like slowing the hard drive, dimming the screen etc that can save you a ton of battery usage but totally rely on energy-conserving system software.

    I'm not confident that any of the OSes you mention would perform at a level you'd need to see your battery lasting a week between charges.

    --

    I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
  82. Thinkpad X20, X21 by cvanhorn · · Score: 1

    You might want to look at the Thinkpad X20 and X21 series laptops. Not only does IBM go out of its way to make sure they are fully linux compatable, but they are less than 4 pounds. I have one, and installed a SanDisk FLASH IDE Hard drive in it (just ordered a 1.2GB drive infact) and am getting 4hours+ battery life which is not bad on the standard battery. They also have a PCMCIA and a Compact Flash Slot so you can expand the storage easily. I currently have a 128MB Flash IDE Drive, and some compact flash cards I use. Slackware can be made to fit nicely on the small amount of space. The laptops also dont have lots of bells and wistles, and are fairly simple, with many options on built in network cards. You have a choice of wireless or 100Base-T 3Com brand.

  83. Re:1 week battery life and integrated fast etherne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    He didn't say that he doesn't ant PCMCIA sockets. He said he wants the network connection built in, not through the PCMCIA slots. Dongles are a pain in the ass.

    he should get an iBook

    Reading Is Fundamental

  84. Beat M$ to the tablet PC by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    I suggest you start by looking here LinuxDevices.com's SBC reference, it is a terrific resource.

    Im not sure the PC itself is your problem, simply getting a proper LCD driver and VidCard is your real issue.

    As Ive seen/thought many times before, even recently mentioned here @ /., is the trouble you have driving a standard LCD. Dead laptops with very cool and useful LCD displays probably litter the parts pile of every slashdot user(!) - geeks are really unable to give up that LCD. Outside of buying a terribly expensive driver card from someone like Earth LCD. Also you may want to have a look at this reference.

    This is an excellent question, an excellent topic and a very worthwhile idea. Basically, how do we hobble together some cheap, general purpose computers... not too much power - not much more than a network connection... these could be terminals in the home, "tablet-pcs", a DIY "ConnectedTouchpad/IOpener/Audrey", portable MP3 players... all cry out for *EXACTLY* the hardware this question is asking for.

    A modular "embedded" PC. Just like our desktops... expandable, extensible and versatile. Why dont we have a solution like this for PDAs? Without straying OT too far, it would be *EXCELLENT* to see a DIY laptop for a lot of reasons.

    1. Re:Beat M$ to the tablet PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posted as AC to not appear too much of a KW.

      http://www.earthlcd.com/controllers.htm

      Regards,
      SubtleNuance.

  85. iBook comes close, PowerPC linux is mature by madburn · · Score: 1

    (This all pertains to the new white iBook, not the original "toilet seat" iBook.)

    From personal experience the iBook is a real strong candidate for providing the features specified. It has all the key hardware built-in: CD-RW or DVD, modem, 10/100BaseT ethernet, USB, FireWire, AGP 2X ATI Rage128 Mobility 128, external video. For $100 you can add an internal 802.11b card (antenna already built into the laptop). I have experienced 3-4 hours battery life in real-world use. All this for $1500, which is very price-competitive with other laptops.

    I've been using YellowDog Linux on the iBook and it's very complete. Latest kernel and XFree86 4. About all you can't get with PPC linux is commercial stuff like RealPlayer or Wine (you get Mac-On-Linux instead). And there are various distros to choose from like YellowDog, LinuxPPC, SuSE and Debian. Or you can use the pre-installed Mac OS X and go BSD (it's easy to replace Aqua with X Windows, or even go pure text).

    If you are truly interested in the best laptop for linux and set aside any preconceptions or biases I think you'll have a hard time finding a better laptop for the price than the iBook as a killer linux platform.

    1. Re:iBook comes close, PowerPC linux is mature by numbski · · Score: 1

      Agreed. That's the first thing I thought of when he started this thread. He's describing an iBook. The only diff is that it's PPC and not i386, and if that's a real hang up for you there's Virtual PC for the few binaries that are only available for i386.

      Apple is doing quite well these days.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  86. Thinkpad 570E by mishan · · Score: 1

    As previous posts have indicated, IBM makes great laptops. My IBM ThinkPad 570E runs Debian GNU/Linux sid/unstable without any problems. I have everything working down to the Lucent WinModem.

  87. Link consolidation by RudeDude · · Score: 1
    Reading through a lot of the comments here let me just say that people don't understand the point of the posting.

    'rneches' has clearly looked at the current market of available laptops. Prolly only missing out on a few low-profile products.

    This is an 'Ask SlashDot' posting. Why are people posting additional questions rather than useful tidbits of information.

    He has specific goals in mind for the laptop of his dreams (goals that I happen to share), why would you suggest a piece of hardware that violates 90% of his wish list as a solution?

    That ends my rant for now and here are a series of links I have dug out of other postings.
    PSI_Linux Psion hardware / Linux software project.
    Sceptre - Hardware retailer
    AMPRO nifty smallish hardware
    IBM X-series laptops
    Linux-Laptop.net lot's of docs on making laptop hardware work with Linux
    TuxScreen strange hardware hacking project
    Cyberresearch hardware retailer

    --
    RudeDude
    Perl/Linux/PHP hacker
  88. Decide what you want by tmark · · Score: 2

    First the poster says that modern laptops have whiz-bang features you don't need (I am hard-pressed to think of which features these might be), then he goes on to demand a nice screen, ultra-light weight, insane (and unrealistic) battery life, good video performance for anti-aliased fonts, and built-in networking. He says he doesn't want a beefy processor but then says he's going to do coding and run Emacs...in my experience either or both require a beefy processor.

    The inherent contradictions should be clear to all. The reality is, if you want all these features, you're going to be stuck with a whiz-bang computer. The latest screen, networking, and battery technologies always come with the most beefy processor available in the day, because those people who can afford those technologies are the ones who need and can afford the beefy processor. Sorry, but you're just NOT going to find ultralites with beautiful 15" TFT screens and 8-hour (?) battery life that runs a Celeron. And as others have suggested, you have NO chance of making a machine of your specifications - laptops represent the cutting edge of consumer PCs in almost every respect except where heat is a mitigating factor.

    And forget about taking a computer to Tokyo and not charging it for a week, unless you plan to leave it in hibernate mode.

  89. Hello, Sally, this is Harry by babbage · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If it can do that, I don't care all that much about CPU speed, disk storage, CD-ROM or DVD drives, USB, FireWire, IrDA or integrated late makers. Oh, and it needs to run Linux, or at least OpenBSD or NetBSD. So, basically, I want a tough little system with a StrongARM CPU, a flash disk and grayscale 1024x768 LCD. Insofar as I can tell, no one makes such a thing.

    Going to a restaraunt with you is a staggering exercise in pain & humiliation, isn't it? I can just tell: you must be the sort of person that looks over the menu at a fine dining establishment and then makes the staff do backflips to come up with some esoteric custom dish for you, because the many, many fine offerings they provide are never quite right. Give me a break... :)

    I wouldn't pick at you, because you've clearly thought about this a lot, but somehow you haven't noticed that your requirements are, aside from just plain silly, mutually exclusive & thus impossible. You want a week long battery -- yeah right! -- and you want ultra light weight (thus, um, no battery??) and built in high speed wireless networking? How much power do you think that's going to draw? I'll admit, I'm not sure myself & maybe it's less than I'm thinking, but you are going to have to make some compromises between these wildly varying demands. If you want long life, it means a big battery. If you want lightweight, it means a small battery. You pick.

    And in the, assuredly long time you're going to spend ruminating over that dilemma, there will be thousands of others that take one of the many fine off the shelf offerings, meet 90% of what you seem to really want here, and they'll be able to get on with their lives without a second thought. Might I suggest relaxing & trying to do the same?

    1. Re:Hello, Sally, this is Harry by squaretorus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And in the, assuredly long time you're going to spend ruminating over that dilemma, there will be thousands of others that take one of the many fine off the shelf offerings, meet 90% of what you seem to really want here, and they'll be able to get on with their lives without a second thought. Might I suggest relaxing & trying to do the same?

      Surely this isn't in the spirit of the analy retentive puritanical /.er!! Why settle for 90%?

      We're not talking about functionality here - we're talking about fetish. We're talking about obsession, compulsion, and personality disorders!

      Its like having a model railway - its a way of avoiding your woman by spending untold hours online and in the garage making tiny, but observable, changes to a train, hedge, track, motherboard, skin which REALLY matter to you, but are incomprehensibly pointless to the rest of the world. You dont have to watch endless soaps and listen to her bitching about work mates - AND you get a new toy sometime!

      In many ways its like art. The pursuit of perfection is always worthwhile if it matters to you. Who cares if it doens't matter to anyone else. If he gets it right he could be using this machine for 20 years. Text is text. A bit of effort is well worthwhile.

      Applause to this guy! The spirit of the shed in action.

    2. Re:Hello, Sally, this is Harry by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Well, back in the old days, devices with LCD screens sans backlight lasted for years on one battery. With a good processor based on MOS technology clocked at a few magnitudes lower of a frequency, I'd say we could have a laptop that would last for months.

      No, its not impossible and in fact, would be very easy. When devices like the cdrom aren't used, they are in the off condition and consume no power due to the electrostatic nature of the MOS transistor.

      Engineers of consumer electronics are obsessed by speed these days. Why a person does not have any choice for humble computer designs these days is a mystery. We certainly do have the best technology to make it work beyond our wildest dreams. Its not good design anymore, its marketing obesity.

    3. Re:Hello, Sally, this is Harry by MobileC · · Score: 0

      This is wishlist stuff.
      You don't have to be limited to current technology.
      Dream.
      It may come true.
      That's what this industry is all about.
      Isn't it?

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    4. Re:Hello, Sally, this is Harry by rneches · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Interesting analysis of my personality, although your conclusion is rather far off the mark. I am a vegetarian, but other than that, I don't bug the wait staff at restaraunts. I've been a waiter, and I've also been a cook - I know what annoying customers are like. However, in my own kitchen, I can make whatever I like. [segue to actual point]

      Your technical analysis is, although interesting, also off the mark. The fact is, there was a machine that met most of the requirements I outlined - the TRS80, and we all know how old that is. If you want a refrene point, what I propose is to build a modern system along the same lines as the TRS80. A 50 Mhz CPU is more than sufficent, and a non-backlit screen will do just fine. When the wireless card and LAN card aren't in use, you can power them down. Besides, you are right. It does draw less then you're thinking.

      Since I wrote this article, I have found a number of hardware combinations that would essentially give me what I (and, if my crammed inbox is any testament, an astonishing number of other people) want: A portable system to hack on, not a desktop replacement. Basically, the questions are ones of design, not plausibility.

      I have a Dell Latitude that I like very much. It runs Linux splendidly, it's pretty light, and I get fairly decent battery life if I stay in framebuffer mode (6-7 hours on one battery). But it's a lot more than I really want in a portable. What I propose is, from a technical standpoint, much easier than building a Latitude, or a Vaio.

      I'm sorry if my tinkering offends you. If hobbiests annoy you, you don't have to listen to their ruminations or read thier posts on public forums. I happen to enjoy building things. The fact that a reasonable solution exists in off-the-shelf systems (with notable compramises) is quite beside the point.

      When I'm at a resteraunt, I order what's on the menu. When I'm at home, in my own kitchen, on my own time, I'll cook whatever I want. I know Slashdot isn't as civil as it used to be, but for crying out loud, loose the attitude. Sure, I like to play with computers because I think it's fun. What are you accusing me of? Being a geek? A nerd? A dork? If you have a problem with that, what are you doing on Slashdot?

      --
      In spite of the suggestions and all the tests that I have made, I have not cavato a spider from the hole.
    5. Re:Hello, Sally, this is Harry by babbage · · Score: 2
      Heh, sorry, I'm not really trying to belittle you or your pipe dream. Pipe dream on, I say. I have no problem with hobby tinkerers doing whatever they'd like, and on the desktop I've done a bit of it myself. But part of the reason it's possible at all on the desktop is that the parts involved have been commoditized & standardized, so it's fairly easy to spec out what you'd like to find and what put it all together. Not so with laptops, or at least I've never seen commodity laptop cases & motherboards and such in the shops & catalogs I've looked at.

      Maybe the difference between us is that I'd rather tinker around with an up & running system, rather than agonizing over what the exact specs of that system are. I never was much of a hardware guy.

      If your idea of a good idea is cobbling together at, I still think, great effort an expense a system that will IMO be not all that different than the off the shelf stuff, then hey have at it & have fun. I'm not trying to stand in the way of that, Mr Quixote. Everyone has their quest, I suppose, and if this is yours then I wish you the best. I just can't help but think it looks a little silly for anyone to try so determinedly, but generally it's considered best to ignore people that think things like that about you, right? :) :) :)

    6. Re:Hello, Sally, this is Harry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it. --Chinese Proverb

    7. Re:Hello, Sally, this is Harry by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      jesus. what a way to back down you weak spined wimp.. ;) just kidding.
      I agree with your points, even though they were made a little too strongly.
      Like seriously, I don't see the point of haphazardly screwing a bunch of parts together to make a system that will end up being (most likely) worse than anything commercially available. Nothing wrong with building your own system but if you're going to go through all that trouble then it should at least be superior than anything else. It doesn't look like it would end up being anything worthwile from your specs.

      While a lightweight developing laptop sounds like a good idea, you're going to need much more than just a platform for vi or emacs for serious developing.. Do you really want to switch back to your desktop if you want access to a design program or the net? Of course if you want the net you need a machine capable of handling the heavyweight programs needed to access it. Which would never run on your 50Mhz processor.

      I'm not even going to get into the battery life issue. Others have already pointed out the (obvious) problems. One of the biggest power drains will always be the lcd screen so even your 50MHZ processor will lead to an insignificant gain in battery life. You will NEVER (with current battery technology) get a one week battery life unless your battery is a 20kg beast strapped to your back..

      Maybe I should askslashdot how to design a rocket that will send me to mars faster than a multibillion $ NASA probe... powered by AAA batteries

  90. Re:760LD works by Erris · · Score: 1
    76OLD AOK with Debian. 150 MHz 586, 24M RAM, 5Gig hard drive swapable CD floppy, PCIMCIA network/modem card. The CD floppy thing was a pain and I actually coppied the 15 or so base system floppies to get Debian on it. I'm told it can boot off the CD, but floppies were quicker than finding the info at the time. Modem works, ethernet works, have not fooled with sound and don't know.

    It works great. The screen is small but better than new cheapies. VI works like a champ so editing is easy. It also makes a nice terminal with ssh NAME -X to the rescue. Put Proftp on it for file transfer. It's a little slow on compiling large codes, but every large project is made of small chunks.

    If I ever feel like it's inadequate, the modular design makes it a natural shell for a home built monster. The keyboard tilts up and all the guts are right there. I've seen other laptops with tiny screws, and wires that come popping out like a dis-emboweled cow when you open it, yuck.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  91. N20U by Sawbones · · Score: 1

    Since I haven't seen this mentioned yet, I've been looking a little into the same thing lately and have come across the N20U, I don't have a lot of specs but do some Google searching on the N20U (top result is http://www.armcomputer.com/n20u/home.htm) and you can see what it's like. ATI 8meg graphics adapter, PCMCIA stuff included, but from what I've seen it's essentially a barebones laptop (no processor or HDD even) that you can customize out how you want. Mobile PIIIs can be had for the $100-$200 range off of pricewatch and 2.5" HDDs aren't too expensive. it may end up being the same price as a dell or ibm, but hey you built it yourself. I've seen a couple float through Ebay but you could probably buy direct.

    Cheers,

    - Sawbones

    --

    Ad in classifieds: Pandora's Box (no box) $5
  92. Rugged Laptops by oki900 · · Score: 0

    BSI makes some inexpensive rugged laptops. Kontron also makes some unique field computers, particuarly the In Rave. Wescom also makes some field computers.

    There are also about 85,600 more matches on GOOGLE. Just do a search for industrial laptops.

  93. Why don�t you try this? by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Linux on the Panasonic CF-41...
    Makes a perfect Linux Box for me...

    Its small, though and really cheap...it definetly isnt bloated with useless features and you can put in a real large disk since there are no bios-disk-size restrictions, the newer ones have real 12" ColorDisplay. Want something special? Its got its CD-Drive under the Keyboard...i think thats neat!
    Need more performance? Try a newer Panasonic Thoughbook...i think they rock!

  94. Re:iMac - he meant iBook, and good idea by victim · · Score: 2
    The iBook with OS-X covers a lot of what the poster asks...
    • yes - nice clear screen...
    • yes - decent 2d video... antialiasing...
    • yes - Good physical utility... no special bag... this is how I use mine, it is holding up fine to such abuse. It scratches if you put it in with sharp things, but its a plastic computer, not Achilles.
    • no - Insanely long battery life ... wants a week That is not happening, but it is better than most and the new power adapters are portable. No Bad bad yoyo. I don't carry a power adapter and get through my day just fine. YBLMV
    • yes - Get networking... 10/100 + 802.11b
    • well... - Needs to run linux or at least OpenBSD/FreeBSD. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. Maybe they suck in odd ways. Darwin and its BSD world are pretty good. I develop there then build on Linux. Obviously this isn't a good idea if you want to work on the Linux kernel, but then I avoid queer hardware entirely for that.
    • yes - rugged I've thrown mine on the floor and it is fine. Well, it is slightly bent. It doesn't sit quite flat anymore, but other than that it is fine.
    • no - Exudes cool ubergeek factor of carrying around a custom built laptop. But consider if you really want that. I mean, ubergeek is great and all, but it doesn't wash off and you can't conceal it with a hat and nice clothes. People will instantly know you are a geek anywhere, anytime, even if you don't have the device with you or tell them about it. Its just that way.

    Cost isn't outrageous, certainly not compared to building your own. $1299 + sam ram from elsewhere gets you going. (DVD or CD/RW will kick the cost up, wireless adds $100, but as of today it is 128 bit encryption.) Think about it as $2/day to have a computer.
  95. I agree with babbage back there.. by Monofilament · · Score: 1

    I have friends like you.. I agree its a great project if you just want something to do and you feel like being inventive. But seriously.. What you're asking for is kind of odd. Specifying lower standards for some and higher on others.. just doesn't work on pre-made machines. If you want a laptop that runs like a champ go to a big companies re-sale auction of old equipment and buy your self an old laptop for like 400 bucks and it will run linux like a champ. I personally went the route 2 years ago of buying the cheapest laptop I could find at the time. It was an E-machines E-slate.. yes many people groan when thinking of E-machines but I ran linux on it.. an it ran like a Champ... A champ I tell you.. As well as it was a kickin' half life server in linux... thats all.. I did much much coding on that thing in my senior year of college.. and the damn thing could take a beating plus it was cheap to begin with..

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
  96. Typo by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    How do you fit W98 and Mandrake Linux on a 40 Megabyte harddisk? I never managed ;-)

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Typo by dda · · Score: 1

      Booting directly from the W98 DOS bootdisk (after all, W9x is not really more than that:)).
      But better is booting from the live version of Linux, then to turn your 40 Mb HDD swap on :)

  97. mwave.com allows you to build your own laptop by giannifive · · Score: 1

    Multiwave sells custom laptops here. You can even get one without an OS so you can install Linux on it and you don't have to pay for Windows!

    I buy all my computer stuff from mwave. They're very reliable.

  98. Apple. by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Just buy an ibook and run one of the PPC Linux distros on it.

  99. Durable laptops by db_two · · Score: 1

    I would check with Itronix.... I would tend to think NOTHING can compare to their durability.

    See http://www.itronix.com

    --
    David Byrd
    CEO - 21st Century Tech., Inc.
    URL: http://www.nite-surfer.com
    See our Illuminated Keyboard
  100. There -are- PC104 LCD video cards by RobKow · · Score: 1

    I've used PC104 LCD video cards before. You can probably find some interesting stuff (like PC104 LCD controllers) at http://www.earthlcd.com/. Additionally, there are many PC104 SBC's with built-in LCD controllers that drive a number of popular displays. See http://www.sbc-pc104.com/ for a list of manufacturers.

  101. VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of building a laptop, why not installing VMware? It builds a virtual PC and supports Linux just fine.

    http://www.vmware.com/

  102. Eurocom.ca by cubbykenobi · · Score: 1

    I was looking for a laptop last year and settled on an Acer Travelmate 340T, and everything is still running nice and smooth. A couple of weeks after I bought it I discovered the website http://www.eurocom.ca. They specialize in custom built laptops and seem like a very decent service.

  103. re: roll your own latop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a Powerbook G4 laptop, put yellow dog Linux, or just run OS X and install Emacs.

    woot!

  104. This is a great idea by djhankb · · Score: 0

    We probably wouldn't be "rolling our own" Desktops right now if it werent for people like this guy...
    This is an excellent idea and I would love to help out in a project like this. I've always wanted to roll my own laptop... And something setup with the pc104 standard would be a great start. This could be the future of laptops for everyone.

    --
    --- #@$DF@#2%@^%3^&*$%FRHG%%[NO CARRIER]
  105. Re:760LD works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always good to see more senior citizens getting into Linux! My grandmother is only 72 and using Mandrake, maybe when she gets a little older she too will be AOK with Debian!

  106. StrongARM options by basfromasd · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This seems to be close to what you want. It just needs a bigger display (which will consume more power). Or try this to obtain that special geek look! Enhanced by mumbling 'Close window. open xterm. err emm dash err eff dot' into a headset!

    Links to this came from here
    Bas

  107. Re:Obsession with fags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its funny cause you have nothing better to do than pretend other /.'s are fags. Its funny how reality will ruin you life eh?

  108. One week of battery life is improbable by isenguard · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem with your specs is that you are very unlikely to be able to coax a week of battery life out of a machine running a "standard" OS such as Linux. Batteries don't actually last very long when running a reasonably fast CPU, and in addition are extremely heavy (so you can't just solve the problem by adding lots of extra batteries).

    With my laptop (Toshiba Portege 3480CT), the closest I could get to a really long uptime on batteries is by adding a high capacity battery, which costs quite a bit but would give me six hours. If I could afford one, then in addition to my two standard batteries (at least two hours from each), I would have a total of 10 hours away from the mains. That's still nowhere near a week though!

  109. Throwaway PC? by Mignon · · Score: 2
    Insanely long battery life. I don't mean 'barely survive the flight from NWK to LAX'. I mean 'I'm only going to be in Tokyo for a week, so I won't need the AC adapter.'

    Here's a somewhat ridiculous suggestion, but it just might work. You know where you're going to be in advance, and you're going to be there a week: buy a refurbished name brand PII for $100-$200, get a refurbed monitor for another $50. (Prices in $US.) Have them shipped to your destination. Bring a CD-ROM of your favorite Linux/BSD/whatever distribution with you and either do a run-from-CD or just a quick install.

    After a week is up, either ship the PC to your next location, or donate it to a local charity and write it off.

    Obviously, you have the additional time overhead of getting your system up and running when you get to your destination, but my thought was that it would get amortized over a longer trip.

    Another disadvantage would be that you couldn't work on the plane, but I figure that if you're not in business or first class, it's too tight a squeeze anyway. I can barely type on a Palm foldable keyboard on those food trays.

  110. A pre-built solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (I do admit I didn't read ALL the posts above... excuse me if this was already said.)

    One thing that might meet the requirements is a funky piece of high-tech I was about to buy when I saw the price: The japanese IBM notebook "s30". That thing is a B5-sized laptop with:
    -Battery for at least 6 hrs.
    -Built-in WLAN-support
    -no drives -> weights 1,3 kgs
    -costs around $2500 at dynamism.com (If I remember that right)
    -it has VERY cool japanese letters on the (english) keyboard ;)

  111. Feasibility of converting a full-size WinCE job? by Lurks · · Score: 1
    Ever seen one of the full size WinCE machines? I've thought one of those would be a superb platform to run Linux on. They have MIPs, ARM or SH3/4 CPUs - full sized keyboards and 10" or so DSTN displays. They weren't very popular of course, since forking out that money for WinCE and all the crippled half-working 'Pocket' range of MS applications was a bit much for anyone to swallow.

    What they WERE good for is, all solid state battery backed memory. They'd run for an entire day on batterys no problem. Hell you can slap in Compact Flash and PCMCIA cards. CF lan cards are just the ticket. Of course... drivers would be the issue.

    I had a Compaq Aero 8000 for awhile (until I realised how much WinCE sucked) and this is pretty much the perfect box for this kind of thing imo.

    The big drawback for the chap starting this thread is that they can't deliver the required power to many (or even most) PCMCIA devices and 802.11B may well be one of those.

    P.S. I got mine being disposed of dirt cheap frin a shop on Tottenham Court Road in London. It's discontinued so they're dumping stock.

  112. Re:iMac - he meant iBook, and good idea by GiMP · · Score: 2

    Linux runs on the new iBooks.. I personally have a PowerBook Pismo (firewire model, model before the G4 Titanium).

    Linux runs GREAT on it. Infact, I would never recommend a non-apple laptop to anyone who isn't afraid of running Linux/Unix :)

    To me there were 3 important factors:
    1. Screen size, 14.1" 1024x768 minimum
    2. Keyboard, laptop keyboards are typically terrible. The powerbook keyboards are amazing, I would rank them 2nd best keyboard of all time.. right under the IBM model:M
    3. Battery life - each battery can do upto 4 hours, in theory. You can fit 2 batterys in a Powerbook.

    They actually say my model of powerbook is still a little better then the new iBooks.. the new iBooks may come with newer/better software, a new look, and sporting all of the features of the Pismo.. but the bus on the motherboard is slower, reducing overall performance.. also the Pismo is upgradable to 1 gig of ram and has an upgradable processor card. Oh, and since they are now a little older.. expect to find them cheaper :)

  113. Re:1 week battery life and integrated fast etherne by SuzanneA · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Most power blocks for laptops ARE international. All you need is the right cable from power outlet to the block, usually its a tele-funken (looks like a figure of 8). Some MAY use IEC connectors (the same as on desktop PCs), which again is a univeral connector.

    When I took my laptop to the UK, I had no problem at all running it off 240V/50Hz, I just had to buy a 3 prong UK->tele-funken cable (not a problem, they're fairly univeral).

    Japan shouldn't be a problem either, since the connector is used on a variety of game consoles and other devices.

    Alternatively, you can buy connector adapters (without step-down/up transformers) that are designed to convert one mains voltage connector to another, for devices that auto-sense.

    Ability to use AC power in a different country is obviously something that the laptop manufacturers thought about, so I wouldn't say extremely long battery life is a real need just for international travel:).

  114. Linux and Laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea of long battery life on linux is a joke. Until the hackers get around to programming half-way decent APM features you mine as well just keep your laptop plugged in if your using linux.

    I have a Gateway Solo9500XL (P3 1ghz, 15.7" TFT LCD, 256mb RAM) and have been running Linux on it for about a month. I've been seriously disappointed with quite a few things. The one that bothers me the most is this recently developed problem. I SMELL PLASTIC GETTING VEERRRY HOT. Running linux on the computer doesn't allow for the intel speedstep technology, nor does it kick on the CPU fan. Now, I don't know if this is a hardware issue, but I'm reinstalling Win2k ASAP.

    Linux is just not worth the hassle to be on a laptop. From the 50% drop in my battery performance because of Linux's crappy APM/Battery Support, and the strange odor eminating from my laptop has made me decide I'm going to stick to Linux on my desktop.

  115. My ideal laptop... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    NOTE: This is just what I WISH I could get for a laptop if price were no option.

    Case: Titanium or spun aluminum, something tough enough that I can drop the thing and not scream "Oh fuck" and to protect the solar panels that'll slide out from the cover...

    Power:
    1. Solar panels that would slide out of the cover and detach so they could be aimed at the sun, also the cover of the laptop should have attach points for them and plug into a common "power in" point2. Kickass light long lasting battery or fuelcell technology.
    3. The "power in" point should accept upto 240V in so it could be plugged into anything, from a car lighter to a european plug and everything in between. Also the solar panels should be able to charge the onboard battery when the machine is off.

    Ram: at least 128mb

    Non Volitile Storage: If I could get my hands on a a multi GB DOC drive, that would be dandy. I'd like something that was like 20mm on a side perferrably. so that I could several of them. My idea is the less moving parts the better.
    Keyboard: something confortable (this has for the most part been sorted out.
    Mouse: The "nipple" works good as do touch pads. Not really sure, maye something better?

    Display: 1024x768x16 at a minimum. Also, the solar panels could be oriented in such a way that they could be used as "shades" so that the glare could be cut.

    Video Card: a card with great 2D and good 3D.

    CPU: Crusoe or SA or PPC, whichever would give me the best weight/power@heat/performance. I'd be pscyed if they could build a processor that had the main memory on the same die as the processor. Also it should be low power enough that cooling isn't an issue. (hence why I like the crusoe). The other idea would be todo some underclocking.

    Security: Since its in an aluminum/titanium case, it should be lockable. Though Acer has started including a Fingerprint scanner on their laptops. That would be a sweet way to login. Try Guessing THAT password!

    Networking: Integrated 1Gbit + wireless + 1 pcmcia slot.

    Enviromental: I'd like to be able to take this laptop to the beach and set it down. It should be compeletly water proof to 10M with all external connectors sealable by either the clamshell of the case or double seal gromits. Internally all components would be sealed in that injectable clearn rubber epoxy stuff. The keyboard would be completely replaceable without having to open the machine. I'm thinking it would be either some clip in system or small aluminum jack screws. As for the keyboard connector it would be connected via surface contacts so that their wouldn't even be a cable running inside.

    Other things I'd like it to have would be a GPS of some kind. This could be just a PCMCIA card since I don't think I'd ever have a modem in it.

    This would be my ultimate laptop. It would be a bit bulkier (probably like one of those thin aluminum suitcase things) but it would be kickass.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:My ideal laptop... by funky+womble · · Score: 1
      Though Acer has started including a Fingerprint scanner on their laptops. That would be a sweet way to login. Try Guessing THAT password!
      I sincerely hope they make sure the fingerprint is from a live finger attached to the body :)
  116. Why not a LinuxLapStation? by Spotless+Tiger · · Score: 1

    I got a LinuxLapStation earlier this year, and I'm delighted with it. 1600x1200 accelerated LCD color screen, 128M of RAM, 20G hard disk, ethernet and modem built into motherboard, and an 8 hour battery life preinstalled with Linux (RH6.2, though looking at their website you can now get RH 7.1 together with recent Debian and Mandrake installations.

    There are some downsides. The CPU is an embedded AMD 486DX clone, running at 66MHz, to keep the power down. The graphics card is 8 bit, the sound card is some crude chipset which can't be used at the same time as the CD ROM because they share an interrupt (though why would you want to?) and the external floppy unit is the size of a car battery - although it does contain a couple of PCI slots. The mouse alternative is basically two "volume control" type rollers on either side of the laptop, left for up and down, right for left and right. And charging the battery has to be done with an external unit - you can't plug in the charger or have the laptop running off the mains while you wait.

    Still, it's excellent. I've dropped it a few times without any negative consequences, and it's pretty cheap - it's probably the only sub-$500 new laptop I've seen.

    --
    Racists should be sent back to where they came from
    1. Re:Why not a LinuxLapStation? by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1
      the sound card is some crude chipset which can't be used at the same time as the CD ROM because they share an interrupt (though why would you want to?)


      Did you know that some people listen to these new things called 'audio CDs'? It's a new technology, but I think it will catch on.

      This thing sounds like a joke.
    2. Re:Why not a LinuxLapStation? by Spotless+Tiger · · Score: 1

      But that's exactly the point. You're either going to want to play sounds through the sound card or listen to the CD ROM. You wouldn't normally do both at once.

      I thought it'd be a problem when installing software while listening to music but in practice that's not something you do anyway so...

      --
      Racists should be sent back to where they came from
    3. Re:Why not a LinuxLapStation? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2
      I have one too, or rather had one - I got my money back after returning the damned thing for repairs several times in the first couple of months of getting one. A LinuxLapStation 2000XP with RH7.0.

      I really can't recommend them. Sure, they're cheap, but you can get quicker, cheaper, nicer laptops on eBay. The screen may sound large, but as they actually vibrate an 800x600 panel to achieve the effect, it's ultimately a con. Most users, including yourself I suspect, select 800x600 and stick with it.

      The "mouse" (thumb wheels) is horrible. It took me several days of practice to get the hang of even simple operations like drag and drop. And the keyboard, while it felt responsive, had that stupid Fn-key for way more than I've found for normal laptops, including often used keys such as digits and tab.

      The whole battery thing is a pain in the ass, as you say. You have to stop using the laptop while the battery charges, and the battery itself is a huge expensive unit so it's not really possible to use two of them. Bizarrely, though innovatively, the battery actually contains the main CPU unit, BIOS, and RAM, which makes for easy upgrading but even so.

      You mention the CD ROM / soundcard crap. I'm glad someone noticed. It's not the only example - the serial port/internal modem, floppy, and Ethernet also all share an interupt which makes it hard to use all three at once. It's probably one of the few selections of things that makes sense that way, but it still reeks of cutting corners.

      All in all, I'm glad I got rid of it and got a Gateway. The latter may be twice as much, but at least with Gateway you don't get third rate cheapo non-standard hardware.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Why not a LinuxLapStation? by karmawarrior · · Score: 2

      My employer got me one of these (a LapStation 95CE, which has a similar spec to what you're describing (2000XP?) but with a smaller hard disk and a maximum of 96M of RAM. It came with RedHat 4.3 installed) Don't use the 1600x1200 mode on the screen as it uses some stupid vibrating thing to achieve the effect, and it's ugly and causes eye strain.

      You're right that the damned things are rugged. I've lost count of the number of times I've dropped mine, on one occasion on the hard concrete floor of the parking garage, and it still works perfectly. The thumbwheels mouse is quite easy to use once you get the hang of it.

      I wouldn't recommend it though. The screen is too small unless you use the vibrating thing, there's almost no expansion potential, and the odd shape makes it difficult to fit in a briefcase or hold under your arm.

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
  117. Rolling your own laptop... sounds good to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow!

    I thought the /. crowd would be more receptive to this... but wait, I forgot, it is now just a bunch of technoweenies instead of actual knowledgeable people now.

    I think building your own laptop would be a great idea... Imagine, all the possibilities... it may be small at first and a little more expensive, but all it takes is a few startups to do such a thing to get some standards out there for building your own laptops...

    Who ever thought the PC would be standardized (hell, I still remember my old 8086... that thing had no clue what a standard is...

    Imagine actually having a choice of what goes into your laptop!

  118. all-in-one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Advantech (and other companies), I think, makes a couple of industrial display/touchscreen(built in mouse) based boxes that could serve your purpose. The embedded PC I am thinking about is p133 based with a pc104 bus. They are thick, but tough. There is a tradeoff. Add one of those cool one handed keyboard and it would be a pretty compact device...

    Batteries though...everyone wants that super-battery. If you find it let us know!

    Allen

  119. Case Mods by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Some place out there on the net I remember seeing a computer that was built into a common suitcase with a screen riveted or something to the lid. had the back cut out to allow access to the cards and plugs.

    Sort of retro in its own way.

    So something like this would be viable if you do not mind re-inventing the luggable ;-)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Case Mods by merger · · Score: 1

      Here are pictures of an iBook fitted into a Halliburton case. Simply one of the best I've seen. He fitted the cd-rom into the side so it opens like a normal laptop, and the hole where the power cable plugs in is dimpled. There are a lot more fine points. The link is:

      http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-Cupertino /5980/index.html

  120. Don't Re-Invent the Wheel by MidKnight · · Score: 4, Informative
    Buy an Apple laptop. Yeah, they're more expensive... but guess what? You get what you pay for. Now, install XonX, the XFree86 X server on top of MacOS X. Now, install OroborOSX, a snazzy Windows Manager that looks good next to the MacOS Aqua interface. XEmacs for OSX is available for free download as well. Now run Xemacs to your hearts content.

    --Mid

  121. Most of these posters just dont get it by Jack+Auf · · Score: 1

    Linus, why do you want to make your own kernel? It's too much work! It's too hard! It's too expensive! Just use Minix or DOS like everyone else!

    Most of the comments here just dont get it. To all these people I'd like to say - it's about a vision of what you want. It's the feeling that that there's a better way, and it just might be doable.

    This is how Linux began - A vision of what one person wanted, and the desire to make it so. Don't be such a bunch of damn naysayers.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
  122. NEC LaVie by Stiletto · · Score: 2


    For long battery life, you might do a Google search for the NEC LaVie. NEC claims 11 hours battery life, which is the longest battery life I've seen in a Laptop.

    Kinda low on the performance side, but the battery life more than makes up for it!

    I just don't know where to get one in the USA!! It seems they are only sold in Japan, and importing them is EXPENSIVE!

    1. Re:NEC LaVie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.dynamism.com/lavie/index.shtml

  123. If you use X, avoid Olivetti Laptops by Prof_Dagoski · · Score: 2


    The thinkpads are a great option in old laptops to install linux on. There also a lot of other good older laptops to install linux on. I tried with it my old Olivetti and had no problem whatsoever doing the install. Everything worked the first time, except for X. It only filled up 3/4 of my screen. No incompatiblity with the graphics hardware or anything, just couldn't get things set exactly right in the config and no-one out there had much experience in setting up X on one of these things. This was probably due to the fact that Olivetti got out of the business right after they made my model. Still, if you're X-guru, you can probably make it work, and the command line worked just fine. I had an Echos P-100 with 40 megs of memory wtih an LCD screen. Aside from the display only using 3/4 of the screen, X worked great. I could run a Gnome desktop very nicely. I figure you could pick one of these up for around $100 or two these days, slap in a network card, and you've got a great, cheap command line terminal. I'd probably try to upgrade the HD because at 1.3 Gigs it's pretty small. They come with a CD-ROM and a floppy that you can swap in and out.

    1. Re:If you use X, avoid Olivetti Laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew, Olivetti has always been a screwball off-brand.

  124. So basically no windows and no multimedia by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Leave those two things out and all the evil splendor they imply: no CD/DVD, no deep color bits, no sound, no floppy, no CCD camera. Use all the extra space for another battery. You could get some battery life out of mono-no backlit LCD screen.

  125. Cheap or stupid by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    People want more powerful laptops so they can be desktop replacements, not just because Windows needs more horsepower. People who want smaller devices use PDAs, ultra-lites and similar. I use my old laptop for all the reasons you do and want a new more powerful laptop. Why, so I only have to deal with one computer for most work.

    Like others have said, for you want buy a old used laptop, the battery life will be the only thing you won't get, but buy a second battery and your set. Also check out an Apple iBook small inexpensive and runs Debian just fine.

    Your mistake was trying to speak for a community instead of yourself. If your going to speak for the community, do your research first.

  126. However... by TheLinuxWarrior · · Score: 1

    All that horsepower does come in handy when you take a break from coding to jump in on a quick game of Quake!

  127. The answer by zTTTz · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems what you want is a highly portable, highly light weight, super efficient dumb terminal or VNC terminal. Well my friend, let's be slightly realistic here, if you are going to have a CAT-5 plugged into the sucker, get an internation power adapter kit. Now I hear, "What about on the plane, on the train, in a boat, in a house, with a mouse." If you are going for extreme portability (as you've implied) and for all of these features I MUST recommend that you try to convert an Internet Appliance into a portable. Personally I run an IOpener with Jailbait linux. I can always VNC into a more powerful machine, or just --display=zTTTz:0.0 to any application on any linux server anywhere on earth (since we have the ethernet installed). It takes DC power so you could easily build a custom rechargable battery out of it or sucker one of those EE majors into doing it for you. If you need a week worth of power, my friend, you need to accept the fact that you will be lugging a lead-acid car battery with you wherever you go UNLESS you get serious about this and buy about 50 of those Air-powered batteries (expensive and un-rechargable, but some last upto a month). I would also recommend converting a WebSurfer Pro. The manufacturer of those can give them to you with integrated Ethernet. Couple that with the fact that it has an integrated power supply that does NOT have a bulky cooling fan, it has an insanly small board, and you can get yourself down to just an inch or two tall and about the size of a piece of paper. Go out and purchase an LCD online. There are many websites that have LCD's that accept RCA video inputs. Pricy, but that's what you are asking for. Finally these things have wireless keyboard/mouse combos so you could hook it up to a TV and use it from a comfy hotel couch if you are in Tokyo, or get really creative and attached a folding keyboard like the ones Palm Pilots use to it directly. Of course you would need some sort of custom case since you wouldn't want to use the mammoth sized one that it comes with and would thus need a buddy that is good with cutting/sanding plastic (just need a circular saw). This also has an integrated M-Systems flash disk so you can cut your power consumption enough that you could maybe get this to all run off a battery (depending on the LCD's power consumption). And you would want to get rid of the lame DC-AC-DC conversion with the power supply (that EE friend again). This second path will give you exactly what you want, but it will take a lot of work and favors from friends. I'd just get an i-opener, come up with a smaller keyboard, usb nic, make a compact mount (instead of it's big mount, and poof! done.

  128. A low cost way to do it by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Its not dumb or pointless, if you're willing to sacrifice slightly.

    First, consider that LCDs are expensive and nonstandard, as already mentioned. TVs on the other hand, are cheap, mass-produced and rugged, even when portable. So...use a TV for the display. Of course, the bigger the TV, the more expensive it'll be...but then you can use it to watch TV too.

    Then you want rugged and portable? Get a biscuit form factor PC. They're small, but they're still standard PCs (which can therefore run Linux), including all the usual connections. You can get them with TV outputs (for VGA drivers), and built in ethernet and serial connections. Check out some of them at this site.

    Most don't come with a hard drive, and you'll have to "roll your own" there, too. You have a choice: buy a biscuit with an IDE connector, or buy one with another standard connection, such as Compact flash or PCMCIA. If you go with the IDE, a portable 500MB IDE isn't that expensive. I saw one for $40 (US dollars) recently.

    Then of course, you have to worry about batteries/power supply. That's not as big of a problem as you might think - there are LOTS of battery manufacturers. You want long lasting? You'll have to pay for longer lasting. On the upside, the compact system shouldn't take as much power as a standard laptop would.

    How rugged is the result? Well, you'd be creating the casing for everything, so that's pretty much up to you.

    So, I figure these costs:
    $400 CPU (with ethernet, etc...)
    $400 portable Flat Screen TV (VGA video displayed)
    $50 Hard Drive
    $800 Batteries/Power supply (enough to last a week - a SERIOUS load, and still probably an underestimate of the price)
    $80 Casing

    Of course, for an extra $500, you could upgrade to having real SVGA video, but you don't need hardware acceleration of video for most applications with which this technology is normally used, so...you can't get it.

    I suppose if $1730 is three times as much as you would have paid, then this is a bad deal...but since the Thinkpad X22 retails for around $3000, I think I'm talking about a better deal than a prebuilt machines. Plus this thing is actually upgradable.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:A low cost way to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinkpad X21 (just a slightly slower version of the X22 retails for about $999)

  129. Linux does work for laptops! by 8bahl · · Score: 1

    I did have a terrible time forcing Mandrake-Linux to install on my Gateway 5300. But Redhat worked great. (Text mode only though)
    But once installed it brought a tear to my eye!

    Here's a website I created as a sort of review. (Had some issues with StarOffice other users may run into with an S3 vid card.)
    http://www.on-point-tech.com/rh5300/

    1. Re:Linux does work for laptops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know how you feel, "text mode only" makes me cry too...

  130. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Handhelds are getting betta. That new Sharp Zaurus SL-5000D has a keyboard, too! Read up on it here.

    1. Re:Actually... by SKicker · · Score: 2

      yeah but compare that keyboard to the keyboard on the psion. You can touch type on the psion, you can only clumsily stab with your thumbs on the Zaurus.

  131. HP Omnibook 300 (nostalgia) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had an old HP Omnibook 300 with flash disk.
    Rated 9+ hours on a battery charge, B/W screen, and about 3 lbs. Of course, it only ran Win3.1 (and DOS), but I didn't replace it until this year, for many of the same reasons this guy cites.

    Superfast processors and high res displays are way overkill for simple editing (I use TeX and Emacs almost exclusively for documents) and programming, which is most of what I do on the road. It is a mystery to me why no one makes a machine like this anymore -- certainly one could take the basic Omnibook design, put in more memory, a faster processor, and ethernet connectivity and have just about everything in his wish list.

    BTW: I finally replaced the HP with a VAIO Z505LS. It is a great unit, except for the poor battery life (1.5 hours tops with the included battery, 4.5 hours with an extra capacity battery at the expense of extra size and heft).

  132. What about an apple ibook? by LostCauz · · Score: 1

    You get it with OS X and you can install xonx if ya want. plus you can play around with cocoah =)

    then you can run VPC when it comes out for ten and install whatever other operating system you want in there.

    i think this is my first post after joining quite a while ago...

    starting at 1,299, it aint bad.

    i'm probably gunna get flamed for posting an apple product though, heh

    1. Re:What about an apple ibook? by LostCauz · · Score: 1

      just realized other people already posted that, flame me if you will, hah

  133. I want to build my own, suggestions please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I dont want to build a laptop. I just want a desktop that is small enough to tote with me to different places. No built in screen, no battery, no built-in user devices (mouse/keyb).. I've looked into the Espresso and Cappuccino and similar devices (some aluminum box by Shuttle?) but they all slack in performance. Maybe once the nForce comes out there will be some better options out there? I just want something about the site of an etch-a-sketch or a decent sized binder that I can take with me to friends houses / work / etc.. I have no interest on using something "on the go".. just something slim and powerful enough to be an all-around desktop replacement. we're talking 32-64mb video memory, 3d accelerator, optical drives, all that..

    hell
    the idea is pretty much like the gamecube except it's a computer and i want it to be more SLIM, not like a f*cking BOX.

  134. ibook by Gen.+Ho+Lee+Phuc · · Score: 1


    Cheap, built well, nice LCD screen, long battery life (thanks to the G3 processor), built in 10/100 networking with 802.11b wireless capable, runs linux

  135. Why Aren't Laptops Standardized? by Peale · · Score: 1

    I am curious...by why aren't laptop's standardized like desktop PC's are?

    I mean, I can hop on to just about any computer show, and walk out in 10 minutes with the parts for a PC. It seems like this wouldn't be too difficult. A case/power supply, different LCD's to fit inside said case, components, etc...

    1. Re:Why Aren't Laptops Standardized? by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      For the same reason cars aren't standardized. I'll get back to that statement.

      For that matter, how standard are desktops? I don't mean interoperability; I mean user interface. I've got a 21" CRT, and 15" LCD, Apple pro keyboard, and a "narrow" microsoft wheel mouse? Does this describe you? Anyone you know? Yet, these things are built into a laptop and would have to be standardized.

      Back to the cars: what are the chances that I could interchange my front seat with yours? Windows? Engine? Gas tank? Cars are built for a variety of purposes and are outfitted to match. Beyond that, the reason we have more than 5 models, is that people see cars as an extension of themselves and want it to match their individuality. Same with laptops. Want to bet that New Beetle owners own more iMacs? The dell color panels aren't good enough (that's why cars come in different colors) -- some people want a flower vase on their dashboard.

    2. Re:Why Aren't Laptops Standardized? by Peale · · Score: 1

      See, this is precisely my point. All these laptops come from manufacturers like Sony, Toshiba, etc that make them specifically to their own spec.

      Same thing goes with cars. Now, obviously, we're not going to get standardized cars, but that's comparing apples & oranges.

      We already have standardized PC components. Your 21" CRT, at least I assume, plugs into a standard VGA port. Your flatscreen probably plugs into a DVI connector. These are the standards I'm talking about. I can buy an Inwin case, an Asus motherboard, my choice of processor, RAM. Presto! a PC.

      There are proprietary PC's, obviously. And, of course, there are proprietary notebooks. But there's no reason we couldn't have both. If a lot of manufacurers made them, they would even be reasonably priced, due to competition factor.

    3. Re:Why Aren't Laptops Standardized? by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      There are some standards in notebooks... For example, my hard drive, floppy drive, and CD all conform to the normal IDE/ATAPI/floppy standards set for desktops. The video accelerator fits the mini pci spec (as do some modems) for internally mounted (not pcmcia) components. The processor module fits the intel standard, the keyboard and mouse both use the standard ps2 protocol. These exact components are found in a variety of notebooks. I'm willing to be that the LCD conforms to some standard, too.

      But, all of these products need some sort of notebook-manufactured middleware to operate. The hard drive has a carrier, the floppy/cd come in a removable package and have a docking connector, and the lcd uses a special flex cable to mount to the motherboard. Part of this middleware are all the enclosures; the lcd case should be exactly the same size as the bottom (otherwise it'll overhang, not reach, or hit keys). Its this variety of enclosures that limit the choices... dell can afford to design the special piece of plastic to connect x to y (or the heatsink that pumps heat from place x to y), whereas I couldn't fashion one myself.

      But what I was getting at was that there are so many combinations that it would be impossible to satisfy. I'd like a dual monitor, dual processor laptop. Technically, it's possible. It's just that no one is willing to invest in the middleware because the market is too limited.

      What I'd really like to see is some of the arbitrary-plastic-shape machines take off (I don't know what they're called; they are used to build prototypes). With a specialized cad program, a person could design a machine, order the parts, and have the custom plastic made cheaply!

  136. Been there by Cyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been down this thought path. Before I get into it (In the end you realize its not worth it) - let me make two suggestions:

    1) Toshiba Libretto - these puppies range from p75|133's with 32mb ram to something more decent (300ish?) - the lowest two models are the tiniest damn things you ever did see. Only quip you might have with these is small keyboard, and only 640x480 resolution.

    2) Sony Picturebook (PCG-C1[X,XS,etc.]) - this ranges from pmmx 266+64|128mb ram to crusoe 667(?)+64|192mb ram. Their screens are BEAUTIFUL (1024x480 though), the video performance is good.

    In case you can't tell - I have owned the lowest two models of both of these lines. I still own the picturebook, and use it daily at work. Its portability and performance are only matched by its successors. The libretto I passed on to my brother when I got the vaio, and he brought it backpacking around europe with him so he could offload and resize his pictures then upload them to a website.

    --- that said ---

    The only real solution for building your own laptop - unless you're going all out 100% your own hardware (insane lengthy expensive) is to go PC104/PC104Plus/Proprietary embedded systems. The advantage is you may make it so you can actually upgrade - but it sounds to me like you're looking for a keeper, and it doesn't need to be powerful. The other problems you will run into is video performance isn't a neccessity in the embedded area - so forget amazing performance. Additionally, you will have a field day connecting to an LCD and once you do you'll find you can't find an OEM LCD as nice as the ones you see in big-name laptops. It's a wonderful thought, but I suggest going with the libretto for max portability (very small dock thing gives parallel+serial for those null modems), or vaio for something with some screen real estate while holding the portability.

    --
    cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  137. Re:iMac - he meant iBook, and good idea by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
    Yep, either a Pismo (Firewire G3 Powerbook) or a current (they did finally speed-bump the FSB to 100MHz, right?) iBook is probably the best choice. Plus, it all he really wants to do is emacs, he should get the cheaper 400MHz Pismo, and find some way to leave "processor cycling" (lower CPU speed for better battery life) turned on all the time. If he's willing to run OS X (it's not Linux, but it's still some form of *nix), it should be easy to leave processor cycling turned on all the time for enhanced battery life. Add bash and a rootless X server and he may find himself not wanting to go back to Linux.

    Actually, the Pismo has one advantage that even the PBG4 doesn't: you can install two batteries. Sure it's going to weigh a little more than the CD-ROM, but that's at least 8 hours of battery life with proper energy saving settings, which likely can't be beat by anything larger than a PDA. (But the batteries aren't cheap. The third-party PBG3 batteries at Fry's are $200 each.)

    Plus, OS X can run MacOS 9 software, and with Virtual PC, Windows software too. (A WINE-like emulator would be better than Virtual PC, though.)

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  138. cause its there... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    it's not pointless... actually what this product should be is a tablet with some sort of easel on the back. add wireless, a touchpad, a happy hacker keyboard, and voila: an open source laptop. rarely is my laptop actually on my lap. 8 pounds of heated plastic. all i need now is vinyl couch covers. a company called dave design (i believe) makes some truly beautiful cases. throw in the new nvidia chip, a 833 transmeta or an arm (yummy!)... coop computers. very cool. i can get the product designers and product development engineers.

  139. Tigerdirect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tigerdirect, of the Audrey Fame, sells refurbished, legacy laptops that might be just up your alley. They're pretty cheap, to.

  140. Re:1 week battery life and integrated fast etherne by nexthec · · Score: 1

    funny thing about japan, half of their system is 50Hz, the other 60Hz ;->

  141. He can't be serious... by gregorio · · Score: 0

    "Decent 2D video performance. I might just be editing text, but at least it should look good while doing it. In any event, with decent a framebuffer and hardware acceleration, I can use nice anti-aliases fonts and play around with the window settings."

    So he basically wants 24 bit video, I believe that there's no such thing as a "window settings" hardware aceleration and you don't need any kind of special hardware to obtain anti-aliased fonts. BTW, "decent framebuffer"?

  142. Costs to much for too little.... by KajiCo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I used to sell laptops that we custom built for ppl, no body would by them because individual parts were so expensive. Why would anybody buy a laptop with a 500mhz processor for close to 1500 when you could at the time buy it at best buy for 1100. Shope around price watch for discountinued laptops, or any good inexpensive laptops with the specs you want and pop linux on there. Lot cheaper than building it yourself.

  143. Build a pen slate! Screen / pointing device to use by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    Here's what I'd like to see a laptop built around:

    http://www.wacom.com/lcdtablets/index.cfm

    Wacom's new ``Cintiq'' LCD / tablet display unit.

    Sadly Fujitsu switched from an active digitizer to a passive, so this sort of thing seems to be going backwards :(

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  144. linux laptop vendors by DuckWing · · Score: 1

    There are several linux only laptob vendors out there. Penquin computing, ASLabs, and more. I've seen several advertisments in Linux Mag and Linux Journal, SysAdmin, and other 'zines.

    You're not looking too hard.

    That said, I'd love to build my own laptop as well. I think it would be pretty cool. I build my own PC's (for me, family, friends, etc.) all the time.

    --
    -- DuckWing
  145. sony vaio!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sony vaio PCG-Z505HS is what I "roll". It is almost fully supported by OpenBSD & RedHat. PIII, 1024x768, X Windows drivers, large HDD, ethernet interface built-in to laptop, pcmcia slots, and with triple life battery, three to four hours of battery life. oh, and it weighs in at 3.3 lbs (more with big battery). I wouldnt use anything else.

  146. Electrofuel -- Insane Battery Life? by Chris+Tyler · · Score: 2, Informative

    To get insanely long battery life you'd need a very low-drain laptop coupled with something like an Electrofuel 120 or 160 (a think that looks like a mousepad that fits under your laptop, but which is actually a 12+ or 16+ hour battery).

    Disclaimer: I haven't used 'em, but I saw them at Comdex and they looked cool enough to put on my Christmas wish list.

  147. It comes close, but not perfect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Toshiba Portege 300CT is a GREAT laptop. It's a "sub-notebook"-- it's 10"x8", with a 1024x600 screen (very crisp, and the aspect ratio is nice, too). I have one, and it runs OpenBSD like a *champ*. Sound support, USB support, the whole shebang. PCMCIA works great, and the parallel and serial port extender bar is *really* small and portable. One of the OpenBSD developers (Dug Song) runs a Portege 300CT as well-- he even has kernel config files and XF86Config files available online...

    It runs on a Pentium 133 with 32 or 64 megs of RAM (depending on options). It comes with either a 1.2-gig HD or a 4.3 gig HD.

    In other words, it meets all the requirements for what you need the computer to *do*.

    The problem comes in when you try to do it for too long. The backlight on the screen (a nifty feature) can be turned off, and the processor can be slowed down to save power. But even then, you're looking at slightly over two hours of worktime with the standard batteries. Long-run batteries will run you $150 (but, hey, not bad-- the laptop itself goes for $250 these days). Battery life on the Portege 300CT *sucks*.

    You can do what I did, though. I bought a small motorcycle battery and a trickle charger. The laptop is small enough to fit in the same case as the battery. I made up an adapter so that I can hook the motorcycle battery the same way I hook up the AC adapter. It will run for about 20 hrs this way. Not only that, but it charges the regular battery while it runs.

  148. Compaq iPAQ by mchang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Full blown laptop? Not quite. But try this:

    Get a 31xx monoPAQ. Get the compactflash sleeve and the pcmcia sleeve (the latter because it has its own battery). Get a large (5gb) PCMCIA drive (IBM microdrive), a smaller (1gb) CF flash card, a Targus foldable keyboard, a CF 10/100/802.11b card, a PCMCIA 10/100/802.11b card, a PCMCIA Sierra Aircard 510, and a CF vga-out adapter. Find a LCD panel that you like, build a battery pack for it.

    Some creative duct taping or plexiglassing and yes sir, you have a Linux-capable computing brick that has a modular power system! Go full-tilt, and you have VGA on a full LCD with a keyboard and your big microdrive. Monitor dies, and you switch back the native screen. PCMCIA battery pack goes down, switch to CF. CF draining you too fast? Switch to internal memory.

    If you want to get more creative, try it with the new 38xx series. Has longer battery life and built-in SD so you don't even need a sleeve. Don't forget, for the 31xx and 36xx series ipaqs, you can expand internal memory to 128mb with some creative soldering (read: surface mount).

    So let's review your criteria:
    1) clear screen: the 36xx has a nice screen, and whatever external LCD you choose could be good.. up to you.
    2) decent 2d video: Hrm... well, it runs Quake. You decide.
    3) Physical utility: Well, build a padded titanium case for your ipaq and lcd screen. Should be sturdy. Use it as a foot stool.
    4) insanely long battery life: modular battery style means you can get long battery life. 12+ hours with the monopaq alone. Since everything else has it's own battery pack (except the CF sleeve), you can mix-n-match. A little creative hackery and you can probably paste an external big battery to the ipaq.
    5) networking: 10bt, 100bt, 802.11b wireless, CDPD wireless and CDMA wireless. Sounds good to me.

    Sounds fun to me.

  149. Be creative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and build a notebook out of a hardcover briefcase. It would be a bit bulky and intimidating, but you can at least get by without all the proprietary parts and upgrading impossiblities.

  150. Variable voltage power supply by sulli · · Score: 2
    Yes, Apple has this, and it's exceedingly convenient. Generally Apple does a good job accommodating users who cross borders (e.g. Language Kits, built in to the OS).

    A funny story: A friend of mine once traveled to the UK with her PowerBook 140 and StyleWriter (a Canon inkjet rebranded by Apple for a while in the early 90s). The former was variable voltage, but the latter was ... NOT! When she plugged them both in with plug adapters only, the StyleWriter (or at least the adapter) quickly began to emit thick smoke.

    Months later, she took the StyleWriter back to the retailer in the US. She told the guy: "I plugged it in, and it caught fire!" Very baffled and concerned, the store owner replaced it - not, of course, knowing the whole story.

    So make sure you have a universal adapter before plugging in your laptop in Europe!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  151. Toronto Microelectronics by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    Go here and check out their 5811 under PC/104 & PC/104+ SBC. Here's the short list of features:

    Intel Pentium MMX or AMD K6, K6-2, K6-2/3D
    Up to 450 MHz CPU with 100 MHz system bus
    512 KB L2 Pipeline burst Cache memory
    Two DIMM sockets supports ECC / SDRAM up to 512 MB
    Dual Ultra DMA/33 EIDE and folppy interface
    CRT / Flat Panel Display interface with 2 or 4 MB display memory
    LVDS supports Flat Panel Display cable up to 20'
    10/100 Base-T network interface using Intel 82558
    Ultra Fast and Wide SCSI-3 supports 40 MB/s
    Disk-On-Chip (DOC) socket supports up to 144 MB Flash disk
    Four serials ports, one parallel port and two USB ports
    Dynapro Touchscreen interface
    Thermally controlled CPU & system fans

    It runs Linux just fine (SuSE 6.3), although I never had a chance to try it from the DOC, since I got the DOCs with Phar Lap already flashed on them. We even got our touchscreen to work! (Sorry, I don't remember the manufacturer.)

    It uses standard 168-pin SDRAM, and supports 100MHz FSB, and it actually has the jumper settings for a 500MHz CPU (not sure why they list 450MHz as the top speed, ours were running at 350MHz). Basically it's a highly integrated, very compact Super7. The footprint is slightly larger than a paperback novel, and the hieght is determined by the RAM. The IDE sockets are laptop style, and the PS/2, serial, parallel, and USB are headers that you have to plug a small interface card into that has the real connectors on it.

    The only interface I can think of that you'd be missing is firewire, but in my experience firewire is pretty sketchy under Linux anyway, so you may not be missing much.

    When I was working with these I was constantly fantasizing about stealing one and building my own portable system. The only problem I could think of was finding a small enough AT power supply, although it uses an adapter which could easily be modified for any PSU that provided the right voltages. Just make sure your 5V rail is stable, they're kind of sensative to that.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  152. Why use PC harware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds to me like your looking for a real unix machine, sure, you could install linux on a windows laptop, and it would work. However, you might look in at http://www.rdi.com/ and check out their portable UltraSPARC-IIi® processor based laptops. Built in SCSI, nice screen, sparc 400mhz proc. Not the kind of battery life your looking for, but worth a look anyway.

  153. Cost, processor, and formfactors by teambpsi · · Score: 1

    Cost is certainly an issue with PC104 -- however for what he's asking for (EMACS => Eight Megs And Counting) -- he could probably pickup some low end 486 cpu modules and run quite happy.

    Processor wise, there are more than just x86 options available, but again, is portability the real issue? if so, why does it matter which processor is on board?

    formfactor is also not an issue. certainly the original intent was 'stackable' -- however I have seen flatboards that provide the bus on the board that allows you the opportunity to put the modules side by side

    its a matter of balancing the resources and the needs/desires.

    with pc104 the thing really could be in the "wearable" class of computer, as a swank utility belt wrapped around the midsection

    and given whatever dietary needs he has, he might have room for a "wide bus" ;)

    --

    Old age and treachery almost always overcome youth and skill.
  154. Build your own? by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Bad idea. Not going to happen.

    You want a week's battery life? not going to happen.

    By the way, from the sounds of it, you aren't the 'typical linux user' by your requirements.

    My advice, and no, I'm not a mac user...

    Get a new mac iBook. yes. That's right.
    Give OSX a shot while you are at it.. then install linux if you don't like it. IT's light, much better than average battery life, very nice display, rugged, and cheap.

  155. tuff time with power by bwhalen · · Score: 1

    last for a week without ac, that seems unbelievable. The rest of it is probably doable, either with an all in one board pc or a lunchbox style thing I've seen.

    --
    Where do you want to be, What are you doing to get there.
  156. Production Laptop that meets most of those specs by Marasmus · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may want to consider the Compaq Armada 4000 line, particularly the 4220T.

    It's like 5lbs, 266mhz Pentium MMX mobile, 12" screen (does 800x600), runs linux very well... grab one of those 2-slot-high 3com PCMCIA cards that lets you jack the ethernet straight into the card (no more dongle annoyance). The stock battery will run you in X, editing files, for about 8 hours. Add a second battery, that time goes up to 18 hours, depending on use. These numbers are with a Toshiba 4gb IDE laptop drive. If you replaced that with a less power-hungry Flash device, I'm quite sure that a double-battery setup could run for 25-30 hours on this laptop.

    I used to run one of these laptops as a car MP3 player, and it could normally go 15-18 hours without being recharged on two batteries. It also recharged to full in about 3 hours.

    --
    .... um, i lost you after "0110100001101001".
  157. Make yer own... by Winter · · Score: 1

    A couple of possibilities pop to mind....

    A while ago I remember somebody making a computer in a briefcase. This could do nicely as a case for a selfmade portable.

    Use a lightwight motherboard or a PC-104 based stack. PC-104 is more likely to have the nice addons as networking (wired and wireless) and usually are easier to run of a single voltage.
    They are also more expensive....

    Buy a cheap 15in LCD momitor, and hack it to run of 12 volts instead of AC.
    Use a 12V sealed Lead Acid or Lead Calcium battery (the type usually used in UPS) This will add some weight, but will give you a long battery life and lead acid batteries are easy to charge, and usually lasts a looooong time with proper care.

    Add you favorite keyboard (keep it in its own casing so you can detach it ) and a CD-ROM drive and you have your ovn portable (not quite a laptop) that guarranteed will give you some (unwanted) attention at security checkpoints at airports :) -snap- (sound of rubber gloves)

    Seriousely though... A portable like this could be made for $500-$1000 depending on the hardware used.
    --

    --
    main(i){putchar(177663314>>6*(i-1)&63|!!(i<5)<<6)&&main(++i);}
  158. Re:760LD works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My father is 71 years old.

    Shouldn't you be in class, kid?

  159. NWK to LAX by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    Norwalk, CT. to LA? Is there a direct flight?

  160. stupid is what stupid does... by Erris · · Score: 1
    I am a typical "power-user" and have cycled through many laptops and machines but it seems I am settling on my laptop just for mail...

    I used to love my Linux laptop about 2 years ago, I felt so sophisticated. Tell you the truth I am running w2k on it now (A Sony Vaio)

    Rooten tooten, you sound like my boss! 6.9E9 HZ, 1E9 RAM, DVD, HDTV screen and surround sound to read email. Hmmmm, he's sophistic too. Let me know if you can keep the W2K virus stable long enough to run SSH -X to that fab desktop.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  161. Nice screen && long battery life == 0 by blang · · Score: 1

    A lot of the juice for a laptop i spent on the display, so even if you power the machine with a Z80, your week in Japan is just a dream.

    For a display, you might need to go with something like e-ink. But I'm sure you'll have to wait another couple of years before they have something you can use in a laptop, and by that time, you won't need to roll your own. Unless of course the manufactureres continue to commit to MS bloatware. Jeez, people, you DON'T need an 18-wheel truck going at supersonic speeds to go to the grocery store.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  162. "Needs of a Linux user"? by JeremyR · · Score: 1
    What you describe is interesting, but I'm not sure I share your sentiment that this is what most "Linux users" need. While I'm certain some of us would like the ultraportable, somewhat rugged machines you describe, many of us do need the "desktop replacement" machines that you so readily dismiss. Not everyone who develops software uses vi or emacs--I do hard core J2EE development using design/development tools (Together or JBuilder), an entire J2EE container stack (Web server, EJB, container, etc. such as Weblogic or JBoss), and database (Oracle or Postgresql), all at once. A bigger display is better (I have a "mere" 1400x1050 display only because I couldn't wait for the 1600x1200 displays) and the more RAM, the better (I have 512MB). And as long as you have all this horsepower anyway, why not include decent 3D performance so you can play as hard as you work? Oh, and of course it all has to be somewhat luggable so it can all be packed up and taken to client sites day after day.

    So, in short, not all Linux users' needs are created equal. Your needs might be well served by one of the subnotebooks out there which place a priority on compact size, light weight and battery life. But for many of us developer/consultants who have to run an entire universe on one machine, we'll take as much machine as we can fit into a briefcase, thank you. :-)

  163. Replacement TFT for a TP 560E? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straying from the discussion just a bit...

    I have an older IBM ThinkPad 560E and the screen isnt as good as it could be. It has a few blemishes, but aboveall the contrast could be vastly improved. I use it mostly for coding under the console and the black background is too gray compared to the white text.

    Anyone have any recommendation as to what replacement screen I could get? Or are these TFTs pretty much the same in terms of color sharpness and contrast?

    1. Re:Replacement TFT for a TP 560E? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      You don't replace TFT's in laptops. Unless they're broken and under warranty. THe manufacturer always want about $1k for a replacement, and you really can't change what goes in it unless you are going to do some serious hacking.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  164. Shame about sony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a real shame that sony have kind of lost thier way when it comes to laptop design.
    Ive one of the 505 series for years now and its really the nicest little lappy Ive found, and is a real pleasure under linux (usb, firewire and irda all work well).
    Sonys' newer laptop are pretty much butt ugly though.

  165. picturebook? by rakerman · · Score: 1

    Sony C1 Picturebook. 2.2 lbs. Crusoe chip. Nifty.

  166. i'm not picky, i just want ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A nice, clear screen.

    Decent 2D video performance.

    Good physical utility.

    Insanely long battery life.

    (and my fav)

    Good built-in networking. No PCMCIA stuff, dongles, or other junk. The system should have a respected 100base-T card built in, and probably an 802.11b card and high-gain antenna as well.

    ... and i want a pair of big titties in my face, along with dana delaney riding my schadol ... ain't gonna happen!

  167. I dual-boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the Sony slimline vaio. It has 750mhz processor, and I dual-boot win and Linux. I use the RedHat boot program and all is good. The laptop is extremely thin, lightweight, ethernet, firewire, usb, video out, modem, color screen... what more could you want for a linux laptop? They are cheap too, if you don't want a 1Ghz P3 and 3inch thick laptop. The IBM slim ver. probably works good too. The computer exists, just look harder.

  168. iBook + Shipstones = Perfection! by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I can swear by the iBook - dunno where you can buy the shipstones yet, tho...

    Seriously, the main drawback with the new iBook is that you'll likely LOSE the new Apple AC adapter - it's so much smaller. And you gotta sleep, right? Charge at night. Turn off airport (remember - it's an antenna - it's job is to pour energy out the sides of your machine!), keep the sound down and the energy panel tweaked, and you'll get a day's work out of it.

    Asking for Palm-grade batt life is a bit much for the present.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:iBook + Shipstones = Perfection! by Cuchullain · · Score: 1

      Shipstones?

      The lager? What are you talking about?

      Enlighten us.

      As for the IBook, they are great. Using the ports collection with OSX you can have the best of all worlds...

      K

      --
      "If sharing a thing in no way diminishes it, it is not rightly owned if it is not shared." -St. Augustine
    2. Re:iBook + Shipstones = Perfection! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > Shipstones?
      >
      > The lager? What are you talking about?

      No, not the British beer. "Shipstones" were
      an uber-battery in some of Heinlein's
      SF stories. The poster was saying that you're
      not going to find the kind of battery life
      the article was asking after outside of science
      fiction (which is true).

      Chris Mattern

    3. Re:iBook + Shipstones = Perfection! by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      Shipstones?

      From Robert Heinlein's "Friday", IIRC. They're fictional batteries with excellent power/mass capability, used to power starships.

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  169. Use the Simeye XL100A Display by Jon_E · · Score: 1

    you should be able to squeeze the whole computer in here , run a connector to a battery pack, and have room left over for 2 beer cans on the side .. can't you just see this guy sitting in coach?

  170. PB g3 might be better by alexjp · · Score: 1

    Actually, a powerbook G3 might be better - with two batteries you can actually get close to 10 hours unplugged. The screen is still great, and you should be able to find one for close to $1000.

  171. Slightly different approach by schporto · · Score: 2

    The big issue I have with your specs is the monitor. I've found any lcd screen uses up my battery much quicker. Heck even turning down the brightness saves battery. So why don't you try something like the eyeglass monitors. No they're not big, but this one uses RCA connections. So make sure your video card can handle that. When you can, hook it to a tv should make life a bit easier. They have batteries for it too. The other problem I have is that a "high gain antenna" probably sucks up quite a bit of juice to knock into that insane battery life. Defintely make that switchable. So at this point instead of your laptop, you're building more of a pc. So you should be able to use standard pc parts. Then just muddle with the power parts (the real magic), and you'd probably want to use a solid state drive to save on power too.
    -cpd

  172. start with a laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replace HD will a flash 2.5" HD
    http://www.web-tronics.com

    Do not use a swap space.

    Underclock the system.

    Backlite the lcd with tritium. It
    will stay lite 10 years or so. Somebody
    may sell the glass. (tritium is used in gunsights
    ).Might be expensive.

    Low powered cpu like transmeta's crusoe.

  173. compgeeks.com by vinn · · Score: 1


    There's a web site out there - www.compgeeks.com. They have slightly used laptops (came off corporate lease) that might be a few years old. While I haven't bought a laptop from them I have bought other things - by the way, their customer server SUCKS. They've messed up a few of my orders, overcharged me for other things, and it's taken forever to get situations remedied. However, they are cheap and they do have stuff you won't find too many other places.


    Personally I bought a Dell Latitude years ago used and it's been one of the coolest little laptops I've ever had. It was only a P133, but the screen was beautiful, ran Linux like a champ, and had a good battery life. If I was looking to buy I'd find a Dell laptop, used, for about $400. I bet it would rock for a development platform on the go.

    -brian.

    --
    ----- obSig
  174. Christine Watkins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the hell is christine watkins??

  175. If you're really serious... by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    ...about that battery life requirement, you might try hacking on a QuickPad Pro. Of course, it meets almost none of your other requirements.

  176. FYI by arthurs_sidekick · · Score: 2

    Plenty of today's PCMCIA NICs don't have dongles, e.g. Netgear FA411 (not an endorsement, just a remark).

    --
    "Oh, I hope he doesn't give us halyatchkies," said Heinrich.
    1. Re:FYI by mmontour · · Score: 2

      Plenty of today's PCMCIA NICs don't have dongles, e.g. Netgear FA411 (not an endorsement, just a remark).

      Given that the thickness of a PCMCIA card is smaller than an RJ-45 plug, any PCMCIA NIC is going to need some kind of a kludge. The options I've seen are:
      - Dongle
      - "Pop-out" connector; cable plugs in vertically
      - Double-height card (e.g. Xircom RBE-100)

      Dongles suck, those little pop-out connectors just seem flimsy (and I have seen a couple of broken ones), and the double-height card is no good if your laptop only has 1 PCMCIA slot or you want to have 2 cards. It's much nicer just to have a real Ethernet port on the side of the laptop.

      Another advantage of built-in Ethernet can be performance. Maybe this isn't an issue any more, but I seem to remember that in the early days a PCMCIA "100baseT" NIC couldn't get near 100 Mbits/second due to the limited bandwidth of the PCMCIA interface.

    2. Re:FYI by biglig2 · · Score: 2

      My D-Link has a lump on the outside, so it's single-height but has a proper RJ45 on it. Looks like this:


      []____
      >/b>

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  177. PC104 standard by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    I can say from personal experience that starting to work on pc104 is a throwback to the days of building your own clones... When everything you do seems new, and as if no one else has done it before. (Which is ridiculous but still you can think it.) There are many resources out there for building a PC104 system... and right now you could probably get away with spending around 700-900 dollars for a decent 486/P1+ram+MiniLCD+Lion batteries that would fit in a large pocket (or perhaps one of those eholsters that was reported on a while ago.)

  178. I had an armada by PalmKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

    it stayed in the shop from the first week. Compaq could never fix it, I traded it for a lesser toshiba model. Now I have a TFT 8000 that has problems (bottom quarter of screen goes out after a while until you turn it off and let it cool), compaq again cant fix it. AVOID compaq crap.

    1. Re:I had an armada by Fillup · · Score: 1

      Fair enough!

      --
      "I think there is a world market for, maybe, five computers." __ IBM Chairman, 1943 __
  179. What about a LART? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have pointed out this will be far more expensive, time consuming and less powerful than a laptop that you could buy. With that said a LART would be pretty close to what you want. It consumes about 1 watt of power (the LCD would need more power), has a add on ethernet card, and has enough memory to run emacs (however you would have to add more flash or a hard drive to store emacs). It would require the hardware knowledge to interface it with a LCD screen. It certainly could be done for only about $2000 to $4000 dollars and lots of time.

  180. MOD this parent up!!!! FUNNY!!! by osjedi · · Score: 1

    I nearly fell out of my chair! That picture (follow the link) is the funniest thing I've seen in a month.

    --
    -=-=-=-=- osjedi uses Debian GNU/Linux. -=-=-=-=-
  181. iopener by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    why not get an iopener - and make a custom case for it. and get it to run on a battery. they run linux - and theres plenty of info on how they are put together... for 50 bucks you get pretty much the whole machine (screen, mem, linux, etc) then all you need is the following:

    a case - you can make one yourself.. or check the other people I linked to (ruggednotebooks.com)

    spend some more money and get a solid state HDD

    get one of those little foldable palm keyboards and get it to run with the iopener: or even better get one of those flexible plastic ones that are fully water proof..

    get ruggednotebooks.com to waterproof the whole thing for you (prolly expensive but they might like the project?)

    and go and actually do this and make sure you tell us when its done - so this isnt just some pointless ask /.

  182. Christine Watkins (Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christine Watkins is the first victim of "Jaws". Read the novel...it is great. I think she is mentioned in the movie too, but I'm not sure.
    It's just a little joke on my nick "Jawtheshark" :-)

  183. compaq presario 1622 runs linux fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i run linux on a Compaq Presario 1622 and it runs perfectly except for the winmodem not working. i do most of my development on this laptop.

  184. net eng laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work as a consultant in a data center and the features I always dreamed about in a laptop are

    2 nics on board
    2-4 rj45 serial ports

    and keyboard/mouse/and vga inputs so that i can
    use my laptop as a monitor/keyboard on systems in
    racks with just a few cables.

    since i'm bothering to reply, I have a thinkpad t20 and it rocks with linux. 1024x768 X; working
    sound, dvd, infrared, and onboard NIC.

  185. NWK to LAX by InkDancer · · Score: 2, Informative


    Just a clarification, Newark Airport's designation is EWR, not NWK.

  186. Does anyone sell a bare-bones laptop? by connorbd · · Score: 2

    That's what's called for, really -- a basic laptop design, add your own processor, video on a daughter card. Either that or a standardized laptop mobo form factor, but that would perhaps be asking too much from the current market?

    /Brian

  187. Look through some used laptops by Jafa · · Score: 2

    You could try starting here:
    usedlaptops.com.

    Surprisingly useful machines, and some pretty damn sweet prices. No, I don't work for them in any way.

    Or try ebay or the like. Getting something used is a sweet deal if you don't need a solid warranty (most geeks don't) or the bleeding edge of tech (doesn't sound like you do).

    Good luck,
    Jason

  188. Another Typo by TheBigDinK · · Score: 1

    If you want to get picky, it looks to me like he has a 40 millibit disk. I bet it's really good on power though!

  189. Forget laptop by redcliffe · · Score: 1

    I want a device similiar to the units shown on Star Trek Enterprise, with a bright OLED display a bit bigger than your palm, with sound, voice recognition, and touch sensitive. You could use a pen or the voice recognition. It would also contain a digital camera, and could have other devices plugged into it. A StrongARM processor, with 256MB of RAM and 10GB of flash should be sufficient. Anyone know how to go about getting components like the OLED display and to build devices like the Star Trek ones?

  190. Hmm reminds me of an Appler product... by Croaker · · Score: 2

    But not the one everyone else is talking about (i.e. an iBook/Powerbook). A coworker had an Apple Newton E-mate which was a cross between a laptop and a PDA.

    It had a monochrome screen, no hard disk, smallish keyboard, and looked fairly rugged. Being based on the Arm chip and not having any moving parts, it probably had an OK battery life.

    Surprisingly, the things weighs 4 pounds (!?) at least according to the page I mentioned above. The actual unit only had 4MB of memory, as well, which seems small, even for its time.

    I suppose, for the adventurous, you could try to track down a unit and use it as a basis for a new machine. Of course, these are rare, and I suspect they still go for a pretty penny. Newton owners are a pretty fiercly loyal bunch. I doubt you could run Linux on it all that well... EMACS is out of the question with so little RAM.

    Something like this, ARM based, flash memory, perhaps a screen with optional backlighting and greyscale, and of course Linux based is something closer to the mark than a full-blown laptop. Connectivity would also be an issue. I suspect the keyboard is a bit cramped, as well. But still... an interesting idea. One potential use that springs to mind is a cheap rugged machine for field use.

  191. Linux laptop by guacamole · · Score: 1

    Oh please. This question is -dumb- but I wonder why this guy assumes that the rest of Linux users have the same needs that he has. Linux runs on Laptops very well. I have installed and used Linux on Dells, IBM and Sony. Hardware compatibility is pretty good. Most laptops on the marked are just suitable for running Linux as for running Windows.

    As for short batery lifes this is not something that only Linux users are complaining about. There are also plenty slick and light laptops on the market (IBM X21, Sony Vaio SR7k, etc) that are not exactly desktop replacement models.

  192. Clamshell IBook? by actappan · · Score: 1
    Insanely long battery life. I don't mean 'barely survive the flight from NWK to LAX'. I mean 'I'm only going to be in Tokyo for a week, so I won't need the AC adapter.' Good built-in networking. No PCMCIA stuff, dongles, or other junk. The system should have a respected 100base-T card built in, and probably an 802.11b card and high-gain antenna as well.

    I would see if you couldn't pick up an old IBook - sure, they're pretty goofy looking - but they've got great battery life, their wiked durable (At the university I used to work at - we game them to CS Work Study students to lug around, they never broke one, which is better than I can say for most anything I touched), and with something like YDL installed - you've got an insane number of options for your configuration. It's got a built in 10/100 Eth0 and you can put an airport in it. That would be a pretty decent machine. You can get on off Ebay

    --
    \Drew National Data Director, John Edwards for President
  193. SPARCbook, AlphaBook, etc by Elbereth · · Score: 2

    Check eBay for a RISC-based laptop. You didn't think that any had been made? Well, there were a few, but they're insanely difficult to find now. I've seen SPARCbooks get dumped on eBay. I even thought about buying one, just to say that I owned one.

    Anyways, it sounds like an ancient 486SX/25 laptop would work fine for this. Go buy one on eBay for $50. Then you'll need to get a battery, but I guess you could hack a modern day battery to work with on of those proprietary systems. You are a hardware hacker, aren't you? Any good solution to this problem is going to require a little soldering and hacking, if not weeks of searching eBay for cheap parts.

    I've got another idea for you: get a DEC Multia (166 MHz 21066A CPU) off of eBay, buy a cheap LCD flat panel, and keep them both in your suitcase. I've thought about imbedding my Multia into my girlfriend's Chevy. It'd be the first 64 bit Chevy, I bet.

  194. Ooops by Aeris+the+wired · · Score: 1

    I guess I should never post on slashdot before my first class, huh?

    --

    "Software is a feeling, refined and expanded by each who touch it."
    -Solstice
    Solstice@deninet.com

  195. Only one reason why this is a bad idea... by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 1

    ... you want to run EMACS on it!! ;) --joshua Depending on whether the mods are VI-guys or EMACS-men, I'll either get a +3 Funny or a -1 Flamebait. :) But it wasn't intended to be flamebait, just funny....

  196. Re:iMac - he meant iBook, and good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > A WINE-like emulator would be better
    > than Virtual PC, though.

    Not to mention nigh impossible. Perhaps
    WABI is the term you're looking for.

  197. Why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, LCDs are tricky to interface, and of course, they have to fit into something - like a unique, non-swappable plastic or titanium case.

    The reason we still have laptops that have 4 hours battery life and still cost $2000+ is because laptops aren't clonable. The case is unique, and therefore the manufacturer controls the entire design.

    Also, there's the RF/EMC problem - if you "build your own", who knows what RF is being given off? You have a lot more leeway in an office environment than a plane.

  198. This site has some good ones.... by guru101 · · Score: 1

    I know you are trying to build one yourself but I found a site that sells Linux friendly laptops. QliTech Linux You can even customize one and they'll build it to your (picked from a list) specs. The 2 set models they have come with ethernet built-in. Wireless ethernet (802.11b) options are avalible. A little pricey though and the standard models are a bit excessive in the hardware department for what you are looking for(ie: 20 gig harddrive, 1GHz P3). I think may be good for others who don't have the stomach for what you are attempting!

    --
    x/0=x
  199. roll your own... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    roll your own joint dewd.

  200. RH 7.1 on my Vaio FX220 is great by /dev/zero · · Score: 1

    Odd that your boss can't run Linux on his Vaio...

    I've got an FX220 on which I happily run RedHat 7.1. The built-in modem (a WinModem) won't go, so I have a PCMCIA Xircom. The built-in network adapter (Intel EtherExpress 100) works fine. The CD/DVD-ROM works fine. The on-board sound (i815) works fine with the OSS drivers. The video (i815 also) works fine.

    Sadly, it seems their Fn+ key controls require software to work, so I can't adjust screen brightness or that sort of thing. :-(

    I use this box on the road for development (PostgreSQL, Tomcat, etc.), so can actually use the extra power this box provides.

    I wouldn't run Windoze on this for any reason. Linux is what I need, and Linux is what I run.

    It's not that hard...

    Gordon

    --

    He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.
    -- J.R.R. Tolkien
  201. Toshiba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well i *love* my Toshiba 1750. It cost only 1750$ CAN, and RedHat 7.1 runs like a charm on it.

    Everythink work, even the Lucent WinModem !
    64 RAM, 10 Gig, ATI Rage Mobility AGP 2x, Active Matrix, Ethernet + modem, disk drive included and 24x CD-ROM.

    And more recent laptops from that "family" are even better, with DVD, 20 Gig and 128 RAM, for 1800$ CAN.

    So you should reconsider waisting your time and money on such a project, and save your $$$ for some great machine.

  202. rolling a laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would rather roll a joint than a laptop, thank you.

  203. A couple of thoughts... by GRH · · Score: 1

    I'm intrigued by your idea, insofar as I'd like to know if it can be done for anywhere near a reasonable cost. I've played around with PC/104 modules and had Linux run on them without troubles. The module I'm currently using for an embedded system supports dual 100M ethernet (ya, a tad excessive :), 64M RAM, up to 192M of chip-on-disk (HD replacement) and comes on a single PC/104 board. To make it functional as a system, only a power supply board and a video board were needed. I think the power board could be dumped if running on batteries.

    I've in the past looked at some industrial LCD screens that were B&W and came with a driver card that was standard VGA, not your typical funky laptop arrangement. They were pricey at the time ($1000 in 98), but may have decreased.

    Battery life can be had if you're willing to carry around a heavier battery (there are lots of off-the-shelf ones available).

    The problem I see is that it would be difficult to impossible to build this into a case that would rival a typical laptop for size. Those R&D guys doing laptop design are miracle workers! I can just imagine what they must be saying everytime marketing comes along and says "we need it smaller".....
    In the end, though, you'll probably end up making the same decision I did and buy a standard laptop of some sort (I'm using a Dell C500 right now and it works great with Linux (Slackware)).

    Just don't give up if you really want to do this. There seem to be a pile of nay-sayers for /.
    I'm building my own car right now just for fun and to prove it can still be done. :)

    Greg

  204. thoughts... by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    I actually put a lot of thought into the same thing awhile back, but didn't come up with anything substantial.

    The biggest problem is the lack of commoditized componentry that would make this work out.

    Here's what I would recommend starting with:

    cerfcube (search on /. or google should bring it up): this has built-in 10/100baseT if I'm not mistaken and a nice StrongARM processor, with some RAM.. Plus they can load Linux on it.. :)

    Then, pick up one of those 1.8" HD's, see pricewatch?

    get a happy hacker's keyboard

    grab a 13" LCD and take off all the "extra crap".

    Now, the problem becomes: how to integrate it all together, for which I have no answer. You'd also have to cobble together some sort of power supply, which I am also clueless about, nor do I have the funds to experiment with.

    Personally, I found a Sony Vaio 505FX on ebay for around $600 with shipping sometime back, and I run Linux (Redhat 7.1) exclusively on it. Works and installed flawlessly. It's durable, rugged, and very lightweight. Small size, no built in networking, though (although newer models have it), and the battery life absolutely sucks ass (I don't go anywhere without my AC adapter and constantly look for places to plug-in, if I can find it), but other than that, it's great. I use it at work to work on programming homework (although I've now got ssh installed on my linux machine at home and I find myself ssh'ing in from my desktop more and more..). Again, battery life sucks, even in console mode. I'm going to pick up a quad-life battery sometime soon (although they're INSANELY expensive.. maybe someone will come up with a retro-kit one day with one of those nice batteries the little Apple MP3 playercomes with..).

    Well, have fun.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  205. To quote an old advert... by GodLessOne · · Score: 1

    You know what you're smoking when you roll your own.

    --
    Is it time to go home yet?
  206. How about a Psion? by biglig2 · · Score: 2

    Since people have already mentioned incuding the ibooks in your evaluation, I thought I'd mention another possibility, the Series 7

    http://www.psion.com/series7/

    640 x 480 7.7" screen, StrongArm processor, PCMCIA, CF, IRDA, 8.5 hour battery life.
    (There's a near-identical machine called the netbook that they sell more into the indstrial market that is also worth a look.
    http://www.psion.co.uk/netbook/
    )
    It runs EPOC, which might actually do you, but there is an ongoing project to get Linux on it.

    http://linux-7110.sourceforge.net/

    I'm not sure how solid this is (except to say that it's certainly not a finished distro like you get on the ibooks) but you wanted to do some hacking, didn't you say? ;-)

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  207. He can get the 1 week of battery life by Viceice · · Score: 1

    Remember the radio that runs on a crank? theres a device that uses a sort of bike break like device that genarates DC power to charge dead battries. I don't have a link for this but there is such a thing. The only catch is that you haver to hand crank your battry back to life in lieu of a wall socket.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  208. ThinkPad i1400 series by aster_ken · · Score: 1

    I have an IBM ThinkPad i1400 2611-411 that I've upgraded to 256 MB RAM and a bigger, better, badder HDD. It suits Linux development *almost* perfectly. The screen only displays at 800x600x16bpp. I run a custom distribution: Linux From Scratch. I'm using kernel 2.2.20-aa1 with a handful of other modifications. Everything including the Lucent "winmodem" works great. I even get about 15 hours of battery life with a special battery made by Electrofuel, Inc.. There are several reviews of that product out there, too. So I guess what I'm trying to say is that there are several "older" notebooks out there that can be used for this purpose. My ThinkPad has survived several one meter drops without breaking (although the case did pop open a bit once). There aren't even damaged spots on my HDD! Combine this with a handheld (Palm, Visor, Pocket PC), and you can really be mobile...

  209. This is one hellva waste of personal clock cycles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a Camaro V-8, take off all the sheet metal and chrome and glass, take out the seats and carpeting, replace the transmission with one from a Mustang, the carburator needs to be from a Honda Celica I want to replace the back and passenger seats with a extra fuel tanks (One of hydrogen and another of Corn Oil) of course I want to have room to store one gallon of milk _only_ in the trunk but I need a mini-pasturizing center to fit in there as well for my projects, I will need some music so I will install a walkman that has a cigarrette DC adapter with a ferris wheel cassette changer in my seat. I want my car to also transform into a port-a-potty so I don't have to worry about my lack of hygiene skills...

    Yeah I think that about sums up the "project scope"... Any suggestions of what I should use in my project? *DUH* The similarities to the orginal poster are staggering!!!

  210. Casio to ship Linux, Transmeta laptop next week by iBod · · Score: 1
  211. I agree...this is pointless by ghack · · Score: 1

    Look - if all you are going to be doing on it is editing text, why do you even need a new/nice machine? Sounds like all you want is an old P166 or 233 laptop, stripped of all its drives, with a PCMCIA ethernet card. Almost all of them work great, have great video performance, and are old enough that most or all of their hardware is supported under gnu/linux or *BSD.

    Get real. You sound like you are building your dream machine. You wanna spend $3000 or $250?

  212. hacking existing laptops to meet specs by jman+sr · · Score: 1

    Have you considered hacking an existing laptop to meet the specs you want? The IBM X series might be a good place to start. Here are the conflicts and solutions that I propose:

    They have fast, battery draining CPUs:
    ACPI 2.0 supports controlling the speed on speedstep processors. If you are willing to spend the time or fund the effort, you could get linux to support this aspect of ACPI and take the the speed down to 50Mhz.
    They have bright, backlit, color LCDs:
    1. Stay in framebuffer. 2. Crack the sucker open and disconnect the backlight, and then use a custom high contrast setup.

    They suck batteries at 3 hours per charge:
    1. Replace the hardrive with compact flash. I have seen adapters that let you do this for sale on ebay. 2. Remove the CPU fan, since you won't need it at 50 Mhz. 3. Buy multiple batteries, they cost about $150 each, weigh very little ( 1lb.), and the IBM can hibernate (suspend to disk) and allow you to swap batteries without powering down.
    Granted this will mean that you are spending a lot of money and not getting what you paid for, but compared to getting custom build laptop cases, this might not be that unreasonable. Anyway, just my $.02.

    josh

  213. Bettery life a week why by maverick_and_goose · · Score: 1

    I've never been to Tokyo but im sure they have electricity. You might need an adapter but you can afford that with the thousands you save buy buying something a little more common. As far as the week long battery goes don't you sleep. This is a great time to recharge the battery, really it is. If you want something small, getting great reviews, supposedly good with linux, and 7 hour battery life try the fujitsu p series

    --
    Whose idea was it to put Windows servers on the net in the first place, anyway?
  214. Forget the LCD. by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    The LCD is your main sticking point. Forget it.

    Get goggles. A head-mounted display will be lighter, use less power, be easier to protect against harm, give more privacy, and be way more 'leet.

  215. Anyone else notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else notice a market for super well engineered battery packs for OLDER laptops? I mean if you could build a battery for an AST 810 that would last a week, what would that cost?

  216. sure. by thecoolbean · · Score: 1

    You can't have everything. If you are willing to give up SOMETHING.... Price or weight... It can be done now. When do you want it? I can build one into approximately a briefcase size now. The batteries are gonna take up the most weight & space.... and most of the money after the monitor... but as a prototype it's a start. Then you cut down on the size/weight and make them cheaper. Seriously. I can spec it out and custom build it in a weekend using STOCK parts. Think I can't?? E-mail me at tekxpres@bellsouth.net and I'll send you a shopping list and my shipping address.

    you WILL have a hard time meeting your requirements and having it be normal laptop sized or cheap. I can stuff a brief case cheap....

    Great idea.

  217. Woz did NOT build laptops by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    The state of the art of PCB manufacture has advanced considerably since the days when the Apple1 was designed and built in a garage. If you don't believe me, disassemble an Apple][ or a Commode64 or any other computer from the 70's and put its innards next to those of a modern laptop. The first thing you'll notice is that the laptop parts are much smaller and _much_ closer together. Also the traces on the board are narrower and _much_ closer together. What you'll _not_ see is that while the Apple][ PCB is probably a two-layer deal (traces on both sides) the laptop PCB (or any modern PC motherboard, really) has at least 5 or 7 layers of traces and possibly more like a dozen. This takes its fabrication out of the scope of the casual experimenter and into the realm of professional printed circuit fab facilities, whose setup charges alone will give you a massive coronary. As has also been mentioned, many of the parts are available only in reels of 1000 pieces. Designing and building a custom PCB the size and complexity of a laptop computer is something only the big boys of the consumer electronics industry (Sony, Toshiba & Hitachi, IIRC) can attempt to make money at. Lesser outfits like IBM, Dell & Compaq farm this stuff out, or find an OEM.

    Then you get to start on the case. It's my understanding that a plastic mold for something the size of a laptop case co$t$ something upwards of 30 or 50 thousand dollars to machine, and you'll need at least 4 big plastic pieces (top & bottom of case & lid) The setup charges of an injection molder (once you have a mold!) will also give you a fainting feeling.

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.