Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Promotions Turn Up in USPS Offices

Several readers, like this Anonymous Coward, have written with links to a letter from Cliff Crouch on macintouch.com. "I stumbled across this letter submitted to a web site I frequent. Apparently Microsoft has promotional displays with free WindowsXP promotional software in U.S. Post Offices."

496 comments

  1. .. by BrianGa · · Score: 0, Troll

    First Fedex, now Microsoft?

  2. So you're upset about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Microsoft has a large advertising budget. So what are you so riled up about?

    1. Re:So you're upset about...? by Sethb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, the USPS was selling Looney Tunes stamps a couple of years ago, and you can bet that AOL Time-Warner was pulling in some cash from that. There were also tie-ins for The Grinch movie all over our local Post Office, so I don't really see the significance of Microsoft not-so-boldly going where several corporations have gone before...

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    2. Re:So you're upset about...? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      I agree, the USPS was selling Looney Tunes stamps

      The post office loves making specialty stamps because it's pure profit every time someone buys them as a collectible and never uses them.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:So you're upset about...? by skybird0 · · Score: 1

      "...the USPS was selling Looney Tunes stamps a couple of years ago, and you can bet that AOL Time-Warner was pulling in some cash from that."

      Actually, AOL/TW didn't receive any money for the Looney Toon stamps. In fact, they had to forgo their copyright rights for those specific images. The Post Office wanted to do Disney characters as well, but the Disney intellectual property people blocked that idea.

      I'm not sure if the USPS owns the copyright for the LT images on the stamps or if they are now in the public domain.

  3. So what? by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1, Redundant
    AOL has been giving freebies for ages now. You have to avoid snail mail and cereal with quite a passion not to have noticed.


    Freebies are old news, Microsoft news isn't always exciting either.. they've had downloadable freebies (IE, web fonts) for ages now so even the combination isn't really new.


    Move on, nothing to see here. :)

    1. Re:So what? by dongkiru · · Score: 1

      Too bad it's not a free full working copy of XP. It's only a demo CD...

    2. Re:So what? by RetroGeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      The best one was a diskette (in the early days) that was distributed with a magnet order.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    3. Re:so what? by lost+in+place · · Score: 3, Funny

      Soon to come for US Postal Service:

      - Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer special edition collectable stamps. Special $1.50 versions: their eyes follow you around the room.

      - Windows 3.1 commemorative phone cards ("Relive the special magic of that release with every call you make!")

      - Collector's Edition Outlook Virus Stamps. 24 special full-color postage stamps illustrating your favorite Outlook-spread viruses. Collect 'em all!

      - Special "Blue Screen of Death" postcards. Nothing but white hex numbers on a field of blue, and you can't write on them. $5.00 for a set of 20.

    4. Re:so what? by BadlandZ · · Score: 1

      Yes, they have a right to place an ad... Duh...

      It's just some ironic hahaha stuff when you realize that the USPS is one of the bigest Linux based systems in the US.

      Nothing wrong with the ad, just the post office must nothave delivered your sence of humor or irony yet (I'm still waiting for my ability to spell, I think it's definatly lost in the mail, so...).

    5. Re:so what? by TummyX · · Score: 1


      It's just some ironic hahaha stuff when you realize that the USPS is one of the bigest Linux based systems in the US.


      How is that ironic? MS are tagetting the advertising at USPS customers, not the USPS itself aren't they? Being one of the biggest Linux based systems in the US doesn't mean they use Linux MORE than Windows. Just means noone else really uses Linux as much.

    6. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right you are. Time to move on. After reading the collective shrug this story earned on Slashdot I know it's a waste of time taking all the babble about "free software" (as in "free speech") seriously.

      Microsoft won.

      ac

    7. Re:so what? by rebug · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This trial is brought to you by windows xp(tm)...eXPerience the difference!"

      --

      there's more than one way to do me.
    8. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction. Solaris based. I work for the Company hosting most of their infrastructure. It's all Solaris my friend.

    9. Re:So what? by Hercynium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are 100% correct. My local post office has advertisements posted not just on a bulletin board, but in the office itself. And these aren't all small local companies. I've seen displays for John Hancock Insurance, Bank of Boston (when it used to be BOB), and even _gasp_ Sun Microsystems. (That one was a hiring blitz, they have a big facility nearby.) On top of that the Post office in Lowell sells phone cards from Sprint (or maybe they're AT&T), and even stationary, pens, pencils, binders, etc. The USPS doesen't generate revenue from stamps alone.

      What annoys me about this story is that someone considers this news... Hey timothy, post something I don't know about. (If this were about any of the companies I just mentioned, do you think it would be considered important?)

      --
      I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
    10. Re:so what? by s390 · · Score: 2

      Isn't there something in the Constitution about Separation of Church and State?

    11. Re:so what? by _Mustang · · Score: 2

      Well for a second there I thought you wrote

      Windows 3.1 commemorative phone cards ("Relieve the special magic with every call you make!")

      and realized it would make sense over the stalls in the washrooms..but that I wouldn't want to be around when some other guy was "relieving" his *magic* in a public restroom..

    12. Re:so what? by The_Caffeine_Avenger · · Score: 1

      Well, the post office may be run like a private organization now, but it is still the place to get important documents from the government like draft cards, tax information, and the like. It still feels like something run by the federal government, this may be why people don't like MS advertisements there. But yeah, this is not really a big deal.

    13. Re:So what? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      The so what is that it's happening at the U.S.P.S., not Best Buy or some other store that M.S. has ties to, but a psuedo U.S. government agency...

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    14. Re:so what? by Humba · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't the blue screens be $0.10 for 12?

    15. Re:So what? by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Errr, I think you missed the point. The point was that a convincted monopolist that has been making the government jump through tons of legal hoops for several years is now being advertised by a different branch of that government.

      Not really interesting, and it doesn't say very much, but it IS sort of funny.

    16. Re:so what? by Anthracks · · Score: 1

      Maybe I miss your point, but I don't exactly see the involvement of Church in this, and as has been pointed out, the post office only has very nominal ties to the government (in America at least). What were you trying to say exactly?

      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    17. Re:so what? by s390 · · Score: 2

      It's a joke, son. Operating Systems are viewed as religions in OS advocacy flame wars. Get it now?

    18. Re:so what? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Visions of an XP urinal puck danced through my head.... shudder...

    19. Re:so what? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Isn't there something in the Constitution about Separation of Church and State?

      No. This is a common myth held even by fairly well educated people. The "Seperation of Church and State" is simply a oft repeated concept that is currently being followed. A couple of centuries ago, it was "Manifest Destiny", and the US thought they had the moral imperitive to take all land west to the Pacific.

      The closest thing that applies is the constitutional prohibition against establishing an official religion at the federal level, something that does not imply any form of seperation. Thus the "In God we Trust" on our bills, and a National Cathedral, chaplains in the US Armed services, etc. Religion is part of many people's lives, and a tolerance for religion is as important as a tolerance for those who do not choose religion.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    20. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You've missed the point entirely. Using the mail service to disseminate is one thing. I can't recall when I've seen the Post Office used to shill something totally unconnected to mail.
      The Post Office is a place to conduct official business (like register for Selective Service, or paying your taxes). It is most definitely not for commercial advertising of this sort.

    21. Re:so what? by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer stamps?

      Considering you have to be dead to get your face on a stamp, I'm sure there are people on Slashdot who wouldn't exactly see that as a negative.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    22. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to nitpick, but he's probably refering to the machines that OCR the mail and sort it. That's Linux.

    23. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd pick up the pack of BSOD post cards... they'd make perfect birthday cards for computer illiterate friends ("Oh, Jim - sorry! It was a really cool card, but these paper computers are so flaky, the post office must have crashed it when they x-rayed it for anthrax...")

    24. Re:So what? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Too bad it's not a free full working copy of XP. It's only a demo CD...

      ...Yeah, but with mandatory Windows Product Activation, what's the difference ;-)

    25. Re:So what? by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Every time Microsoft does anything, slashdot gets a flood of submissions untill a story is posted. It's not that it's newsworthy, it's that the flood of submissions is annoying enough that the admins often post the story to shut people up.

    26. Re:So what? by Stackis · · Score: 1

      You would have to have a hole in your head to even considering Windows "phone home" XP

      --

      "Look where we worship" -- Jim Morrison
    27. Re:so what? by FattMattP · · Score: 5, Informative
      The Post Office isn't some holy place, it's barely connected with the government, and hasn't received any tax dollars since Nixon. It's basically a private organization.
      Whether it has received any tax dollars or not is irrelevant. It's part of the government. Did you notice their domain was usps.gov? Did you know that it is illegal to attempt to compete against the USPS with mail delivery under the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 39, Chapter 1, Sec. 310.2, paragraph (a)? Those regulations are only suspended for mail that is considered "urgent" and "critial" but only if it's being delivered more than 50 miles away from where it's sent. In those cases, companies can compete but they are required by law to charge more than the USPS would, even if the USPS can do it cheaper. Read about it in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 39, Chapter 1, Sec. 320.6, paragraph (c). Did you know that the Postal Service is exempt from property taxes? They are exempt from parking tickets as well. They even have their own law enforcement branch with badges and guns.

      Sounds like government to me, warts and all.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    28. Re:So what? by jazman_777 · · Score: 2
      The so what is that it's happening at the U.S.P.S., not Best Buy or some other store that M.S. has ties to, but a psuedo U.S. government agency...


      Birds of a feather flock together. Microsoft the Monopolist along with USPS the Monopolist.

      Funny thing is, the US DOJ went after Microsoft, trying to break its monopoly grip. So why doesn't the DOJ go after the USPS for its monopoly grip on first class mail service? Because the USPS is a government-sanctioned and -backed and -enforced monopoly, which makes the whole thing against Microsoft fairly ironic.

      Question: is it _being_ a monopoly that is bad for consumers? If so, go after the USPS, too.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    29. Re:so what? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      What I'm really waiting for is the release of MSN Goverment, but until then I suppose I'll have to put up with MSN Postal Service.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    30. Re:So what? by SonCorn · · Score: 1

      In order for something to be a true monopoly there must be barriers to entry to the market. MS is able to create those by controlling such a large portion of the software market. More specifically the OS market.
      The USPS doesn't do anything to block UPS or FedEx from entering the mail delivery market. Really it just comes down to the fact that it isn't profitable for a company to deliver mail for 0.34 USD per envelope. (I know that there are a lot of other options and classes)

      So the USPS is not something that the DOJ should go after.

      --
      What good is a used up world, and how could it be worth having? --Sting
    31. Re:So what? by Gorobei · · Score: 2

      Birds of a feather flock together. Microsoft the Monopolist along with USPS the Monopolist.


      Funny thing is, the US DOJ went after Microsoft, trying to break its monopoly grip. So why doesn't the DOJ go after the USPS for its monopoly grip on first class mail service? Because the USPS is a government-sanctioned and -backed and -enforced monopoly, which makes the whole thing against Microsoft fairly ironic.


      No! The DOJ went after Microsoft for unfair use of its monopoly. It's fine to be a monopoly, but when you are, you must play be much stricter rules. For example, the USPS must deliver to everyone, and therefore can't charge an extra $50 to people living in out of the way areas. They also can't decide to charge more to businesses that also use FedEx at times.


      As a government sanctioned monopoly, USPS is restricted more: they can't even raise prices without approval.


      If Microsoft had carefully documented APIs, provided all firms with equal access to new product information, and not entered into special pricing deals (Win for $45 if you don't allow dual-OSes,) they probably would never have been attacked by the DOJ.

    32. Re:so what? by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      What - you LIKE Microsoft?

      I'd love to see an XP urinal puck. I'd love to use one.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    33. Re:So what? by Sethb · · Score: 2

      No, you'd have to have a hole in your head to buy the retail version with Product Activation, when you can use the corporate version that lacks it, just get your employer to buy you a license. :)

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    34. Re:so what? by sunhou · · Score: 1

      My old Toshiba laptop came with a sticker on it that said "Made for Windows 95" (although I installed Linux on it). I took the sticker off, and stuck it on my toilet.

    35. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S.'s biggest true monopoly (as in gov't chartered) in cahoots with the U.S.'s biggest de facto monopoly. Anybody surprised?

    36. Re:So what? by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      FYI: The Post Office is a private company (still somewhat affiliated with the U.S. government as a legal monopoly). They are under a board of governors that approves postal rates and various other things, but just like a corporation, they have to turn a profit.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    37. Re:so what? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      No, but it still does the branding thing, which I see enough of. Now a picture of bill might just work...

    38. Re:So what? by grimarr · · Score: 1
      The USPS doesn't do anything to block UPS or FedEx from entering the mail delivery market.

      Actually, that's not true. The USPS is by law the only organization allowed to deliver first-class mail. Several large companies had to pay fines a few years ago because they were sending things by FedEx, etc that the USPS said should have gone via USPS, and they wanted the postage they should have gotten. I wish I could remember the details, but I think it was about 10 years ago. I've been trying to find a reference to it, but I haven't.

    39. Re:So what? by macX_rocks · · Score: 1

      Microsoft won

      ac

      [a]nonymous (and apparently listless, lethargic, pusillanimous, spineless and dumpy) [c]ow

      Perhaps they have beaten you...

    40. Re:So what? by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2

      jazman_777 wrote:

      > Question: is it _being_ a monopoly that is bad for consumers?

      Of course not. It is possible (at least in an ideal world) to have a company become a monopoly because it has the best quality products for a fair price and it always treats the customers fairly. Once this fictional company got to be a monopoly, they always try extra hard to make sure they are giving everybody a fair shake, constantly innovating, keeping those customers and their employies happy, etc. I don't see our fictional company getting into any antitrust trouble.

      Microsoft's deal is that it got its monopoly by being a bully, it is keeping its monopoly by being a meanie, and it is using that monopoly to get itself more monopolies so it can have more people to bully and be mean to. To Microsoft, competition is not a fair game between friendly rivals. It is a brutal conquest, a war whose victims litter the landscape, and in which Microsoft cheats any chance it can get. Microsoft has raised prices, tossed quality, service, and real innovation in the dumpster, and in general, has made a bloody illegal nuisance of itself. It has committed crimes, and it looks like it will never pay for them. Microsoft thinks it is above the law. The problem is not an overbearing government, but one that chickened out at the end.

      Microsoft can escape the law, but can it escape justice? Even if the dissenting states loose, there are still civil suits that can be brought based on the guilty verdict. Like say, the one Netscape just filed. ;)

      "The path of peace is yours to discover for eternity."
      "Mosura", 1961

    41. Re:so what? by glwtta · · Score: 2

      Did you know that it is illegal to attempt to compete against the USPS with mail delivery

      I am still waiting to see how that whole Trystero thing pans out...

      W.A.S.T.E.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    42. Re:So what? by grimarr · · Score: 1
      I found this abstract at washingtonpost.com. Sorry I can't get the whole article....


      Bill McAllister Washington Post Staff Writer

      January 12, 1994; Page a17

      Section: A SECTION

      Word Count: 865

      An ongoing battle between the Postal Service and commercial overnight delivery services including Federal Express has a new and surprising focus: the federal government. An audit by postal inspectors released yesterday accused five federal agencies of routinely infringing on the Postal Service's monopoly on first-class mail by using Federal Express to ship materials that are not time-sensitive. Under laws that are more than 100 years old, the Postal Service is supposed to have a ....

    43. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They even have their own law enforcement >>branch [usps.gov] with badges and guns.

      Actually they have two law enforcement branches. They have the US Postal Inspectors (I belive it's the oldest Federal Law Enforcement Agency) and the US Postal Police (similar to the Federal Protective Service or FBI Police, just some glorified rent-a-cops). Both of them are Federal Law Enforcement Agencies and can bust you for _any_ . I'm actually thinking of starting an obscure Law enforcement agency website. You will be able to find it at http://www.bermudez.cc/lawenforcement/

    44. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there is.

    45. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For that post, you are hereby awarded a warm mouthful of semen.


      -Jigatroll

    46. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't there something in the Constitution about Separation of Church and State?

      No. This is a common myth held even by fairly well educated people. [etc., etc.]

      Actually, separation of Church and State is explicit in the US Constitution and has been upheld by the US Supreme Court, as well as lower Courts, in numerous cases.

      You are free to believe and practice whatever religion you choose, but when you try to proselytize in my Post Office, my children's schools, City Hall, the Courts, or even the public parks, you are over the line and I'll drive you out of there at gunpoint if needed. You _WILL NOT_ tell me what to believe or which church to attend, and you won't tell my neighbors what church to attend by wrapping yourself in a flag of official sanction. I'll petition, file suits, but then in extremity, I'll shoot you in the head to stop you.

      The present focus of law enforcement on Islamic fundamentalist terrorists is myopic, in that it conveniently overlooks the home-grown Christian fundamentalist assholes who are just as whacko and potentially dangerous as all those wierdo raghead camel-jockey terrorists. The only difference is, those right-wing skinhead Aryan-Nations morons are nominally "Christian" (yeah, like in The Crusades) and (maybe a clue) US AG Ashcroft's native constituency. But then, I guess you're one of those poor dupes.

    47. Re:so what? by mpe · · Score: 2

      A couple of centuries ago, it was "Manifest Destiny", and the US thought they had the moral imperitive to take all land west to the Pacific.

      Then a hundred years later "to the pacific" became "half way across the pacific" :)

    48. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In actual fact the USPS is a monopoly for certain types of delivery. But what is also true is that the prices that the USPS charges for mail delivery is also regulated and set by the government.

    49. Re:so what? by GdoL · · Score: 1

      So, they are not gov they are only a corporation with huge privelegies, and still losing market.

      --

      ------I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.------
    50. Re:so what? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Could that picture be more of a pitch for a cheesy cop show? "U.S. Postal Inspection Service", starring Chuck Studley as Inspector Bulge Gently, with Mary Clogg as Special Inspector Katy Aryan and Jane Smith as tenuously Hispanic Undercover Investigator Jennifer Aquilera. Plus other ethnic minority people! In the background! Doing the filing, or something!

      Episode #1: This Time It's Federal...

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    51. Re:So what? by Traicovn · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you want to start a private mail company there is nothing stopping you. The secret is that you can't deliver to a USPS mail box. Technically, the mailbox at your house doesn't even belong to you, it's US Gov't property, consider your ownership of it to be a non-time-limited lease... Now, if a company was able to get people to put a seperate box at their house, or was willing to hand deliver mail, and came up with a way to do it effectively and cheaply than you could conceivably start a private mail service.

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
    52. Re:so what? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Actually, separation of Church and State is explicit in the US Constitution

      Show me. There's a copy here for your reading pleasure.

      has been upheld by the US Supreme Court, as well as lower Courts, in numerous cases.

      I agree. That's what makes it a current working philosophy.

      you won't tell my neighbors what church to attend by wrapping yourself in a flag of official sanction. I'll petition, file suits, but then in extremity, I'll shoot you in the head to stop you.

      And if you try to stop one of my Christian, Islamic or Athestic fellow citizens from being *able* to proselytize, I'll shoot back. As I said, there is a prohibition against the state mandating a specific religion at the federal level, but nothing says that citizens cannot discuss their beliefs in public places, be that on a street corner, post office or a bible study group meeting at a school.

      Or are you saying that not *all* free speech should be protected, just the kind you like, and not *all* philosophies should be allowed, just the ones you approve of? I was taught religion as a matter of course in both high school and college at three secular schools, and to ignore something that has shaped the history and development of cultures around the world (including ours) is more than asinine, it's willful ignorance.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    53. Re:So what? by sh00z · · Score: 1
      Really it just comes down to the fact that it isn't profitable for a company to deliver mail for 0.34 USD per envelope.
      Actually, some folks have come up with workable business plans, BUT... it is illegal to charge less for domestic mail delivery than USPS does. THAT is what keeps them an effective monopoly.
    54. Re:so what? by gswallow · · Score: 1

      Haven't you seen "The Postman?"

      When the shit hits the fan and some geek-led flame wars boils over and destroys the USA, Kevin Costner is supposed to save us all by carrying aluminum siding advertisements to the three people left in the country, and everyone will buy the aluminum siding and save the economy and start a new economy under Prime Minister Chrysler. What do you mean the Post Office isn't a government organization? It's the only one left!

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.
    55. Re:So what? by chris_mahan · · Score: 2

      How much you want to bet that if they don't turn a profit, our taxes will bail them out?

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    56. Re:So what? by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      I have no doubts whatsoever on that score. They operate in that wierd area of a legal monopoly (kind of like utility companies before Texas !@#$!@#$ deregulated them). It's one of the few monopolies that I think is a good idea.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    57. Re:So what? by von+Moltke · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, the USPS was prohibited from turning a profit; it is only supposed to make enough to cover its operating expenses. I don't know how out of date I am; the USPS has changed radically in the past few years.

    58. Re:So what? by Juln · · Score: 1

      yeah, except chevy has to pay for the metal, labor , and would go bankrupt... microsoft, they could afford to give away 'window xp' especially since it drives you towards other products of their that make plenty of money, like locking you into IE to help their server business, locking you into their office software, etc. Also, in their trial it came up that they oculd have afforded to sell Win98 for 40-50 and still made money, but instead, they decided on $89 and $190. Thanks, MS. NOt to mention, they make about $900 Million a month in profit.

      --
      Juln
    59. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the USPS is required, according to Congress, to conduct business as a private entity, I do not see any validation in such a critique. I do believe the USPS has sold various other items in its retail spaces, and this seems like a logical extension of that business model. Keep in mind, every dime they bring in for that type of distribution, is less we pay for mail service. That government agency seems to have been sucking wind for a while in terms of its bottom line, especially in view of this anthrax issue. I know we are about to get a rate increase, but maybe the next one will be a bit delayed if the usps is successfull with some of these ventures. The bottom line for me is, does it really hurt having disks or other promotional items sitting in a post office. If it bothers you, just don't take one.

  4. email and snail mail by Proud+Geek · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Well, they probably put it in the post office to capture back the customers they lost when their email went down from receiving too many files "to have your advice." They want to get a chance to recapture their customers when they head off to the post office to send their mail that way instead.

    --

    Even Slashdot wants to hide some things

    1. Re:email and snail mail by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Well, they probably put it in the post office to capture back the customers they lost when their email went down from receiving too many files "to have your advice."

      But could it be that Microsoft is giving you WinXP "to have your advice" on it?

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    2. Re:email and snail mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, why is email faster than usps mail anyway?

  5. Is this the right site? by Glonk · · Score: 0, Funny

    News for nerds: Signage in a post office. Yeah...

    Stuff that matters: MS advertising in post offices. Indeed, the world will never be the same.

    1. Re:Is this the right site? by baronben · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can that happen?
      I know this sounds a bit naïve, but there are some places were I feel
      I shouldn't have to see ads. My taxes (as much of a pittance that they are)
      pay for post offices among other things. Why should the post office then need
      get funding from elsewhere? I would be willing to pay 35 cents for a stamp if
      it meant not having to see ads in the post office, just as I would pay more
      taxes to make sure there aren't
      any ads in schools

  6. Here's the reason by flynt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For better or worse, the US government is large. In fact, it is HUGE. It would be impossible for every decision to be internally consistent in any organziation this size. This is why you always see those exposes on ABC and the like saying Branch A of govt does this and that while Branch B seems to be doing someething flying in the face of it. Its not necessarily that the govt. are hypocrites, all it is is a aggregate of people like you and I. So in this case, its not really the worst thing in the world. And what happend to "innocent until proven guilty"?

    1. Re:Here's the reason by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what happend to "innocent until proven guilty"?

      MS has been proven guilty -- the only thing under review is what the penalty will be.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:Here's the reason by MisterQueue · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the Postal Service isn't owned by the gov't, it is regulated by them but it works more like a franchise. Each sector is run by an owner who has to follow the regulations of the gov't who comes in and checks up regularly. (Sort of like a food inspection I suppose.) Only reason I know any of this is because my dad has been working for them for about 20 years now.

      -Q

      --
      "I was not put on this earth to listen to meat! Frylock..were you?" -Master Shake
    3. Re:Here's the reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may have been mentioned lower in the threads, but I seem to recall hearing that the Post Office has been privatized. That's part of why the per oz prices have been rising; now it doesn't have to be approved by 3 dozen managers and a guy named "Bob".

      At least, that's what my (work) mailperson said while I was telling her about nightmare my (home) mailperson has been leaving. (Bent mail from DVD rental places, etc...)

      Cut and Pasted from another attempted post ... told to wait 20 seconds ... told to wait 2 seconds ... "page not available" ... retry and type all this in here.

      ARGH.

    4. Re:Here's the reason by idiotnot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the Postal Service is wholly owned by the Government, but run as a private corporation. The Federal Government is the only shareholder, and thus elects the board, etc. etc. Government corporations are not at all uncommon....many cities and school divisions (colleges, too) operate exactly the same way.

    5. Re:Here's the reason by cheezedawg · · Score: 1

      What a dumb article. Its called marketing. Are we going to start bitching now because some government agencies (or entities associated with the government like the Postal Service) are actually using Windows on their desktop PC's?

      And like flynt was saying, just because the DOJ thinks Microsoft sux doesnt mean the postal service does too...

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    6. Re:Here's the reason by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      That doesn't apply at all. Being proven guilty does not legally impede a persons actions until a punishment or imposition has been decided. And as you pointed out, nothing has been laid out yet. So, besides the karma whored, is there a point?

    7. Re:Here's the reason by clueless_penguin · · Score: 1
      This is just to counteract all those AOL CDs flying around in the mail.

      --
      Use the spatula, Luke
    8. Re:Here's the reason by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Um, yes it can. It's most common in criminal trials, not civil ones, but if J. Random Person is convicted of murder but sentencing has not yet been passed, his actions will be pretty damn impeded by being in a small holding cell somewhere.

      Now here's where the comparison breaks down. It is impossible to arrest M$. Any specific person working for the corporation, sure, but the company can not be locked up. But while the punishment phase is under review in civil cases, the party being punished usually acts on their best behavior as regards the case they were found guilty under, so as to avoid additional punishment for continuing the acts under which they were charged. Is M$ doing that?

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    9. Re:Here's the reason by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      Hey, i think its just as idiotic that my post got to 5 as you do. I was just clarifying that MS is in (legal) fact guilty of crimes in the US. Has nothing to do with the USPS, only the original post i was replying to. It may have been rhetorical, but it sure seemed like he was saying they hadn't been proven guilty of anything yet (or that their guilt was being reevaluated, and thus they should be treated as innocent).

      My karma is still way above 50, so i can only lose, never gain :(

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    10. Re:Here's the reason by mpe · · Score: 2

      Now here's where the comparison breaks down. It is impossible to arrest M$. Any specific person working for the corporation, sure, but the company can not be locked up.

      THis is one place where the idea of corporations as "people" breaks down. However it is possible to freeze any or even all assets of any entity. This might be a suitable castodial detention analogy.

      But while the punishment phase is under review in civil cases, the party being punished usually acts on their best behavior as regards the case they were found guilty under, so as to avoid additional punishment for continuing the acts under which they were charged.

      Also whilst the court case is ongoing they can be found to be "in contempt of court" and thus subject to very tough penalties.
      Carrying on regardless after being found guilty is a good way to show contempt.

    11. Re:Here's the reason by martinflack · · Score: 2

      Give me a BREAK!

      The USPS hasn't heard of the largest antitrust action in recent years??

      They have never promoted non-mail 3rd party products before - Someone in USPS Legal didn't have to approve the new MS signs? They didn't say, hey is this a dumb idea or what?

      This is a simple, blatant, disgusting case of "Money Talks".

      Sorry, but I'm saddened at such things from my government.

    12. Re:Here's the reason by gammoth · · Score: 1

      Great. As shareholder, I don't want private companies advertised by my Postal Service!

    13. Re:Here's the reason by Jay+L · · Score: 2

      I'm no fan of Microsoft's aggressive defense and expansion of their monopoly, but this isn't either.

      Is it inappropriate for the USPS to allow ANYONE to advertise at the post office? Yes, I think so.

      Does Microsoft taking a formerly "pristine", ad-free space and turning it into a commerce zone make me angry? Yes, as always.

      Does what they're doing have ANYTHING to do with illegal coercion or other anti-trust behaviors? Nope.

      If Sun and Oracle and Netscape had USPS displays, and Microsoft offered the USPS tons of money to sell XP - but *only* if they pulled down the other displays - *THEN* we're maybe talking anti-trust.

    14. Re:Here's the reason by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      However it is possible to freeze any or even all assets of any entity. This might be a suitable castodial detention analogy.

      Yes it is possible, but it isn't done automatically. If an individual is convicted of a crime they are put in jail to await sentencing. In the case of a corporation nothing is done while awaiting sentencing. Freezing assets can certainly be a part of the sentence, but I think the arguement here is that if a corporation is treated as a person the freeze should happen as soon as the corporation is found guilty, just as an individual would be put in jail immediately upon being found guilty.

      I'm not saying I agree with this idea. It has it's merits, certainly, but it definately has it's problems as well. Sudden and massive unemployment (at least in MS' case) is one that immediately comes to mind. Perhaps the frozen assets could be used to pay unemployment benefits to the former employees. I don't know, I'm just talking off the top of my head here. I think it's worth looking at, though.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    15. Re:Here's the reason by mpe · · Score: 2

      If an individual is convicted of a crime they are put in jail to await sentencing. In the case of a corporation nothing is done while awaiting sentencing.

      Indivuduals are frequently held in jails awaiting trial (and sometimes even whilst awaiting being charged with anything), if not held in jail an accused may have to make some kind of bail bond or be subject to movement restrictions or curfew. None of these are punishment, because at that point the accused have not been found guilty of anything.

      but it definately has it's problems as well. Sudden and massive unemployment (at least in MS' case) is one that immediately comes to mind.

      In which case the obvious option when a corporation breaks the law would be to treat them in the same was as a criminal (or terrorist) organisation. But no-one would use the excuse "going after Bin Landen, would cause too many civilan casualties".

    16. Re:Here's the reason by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      Indivuduals are frequently held in jails awaiting trial (and sometimes even whilst awaiting being charged with anything), if not held in jail an accused may have to make some kind of bail bond or be subject to movement restrictions or curfew.

      An individual can run away, thus escaping justice. Bail is usually set according to two things: the seriousness of the crime and the likelyhood of flight. I suppose it's theoretically possible for a Corporation to run away, but I don't know how.

      None of these are punishment, because at that point the accused have not been found guilty of anything.

      It's true that these penalties are not generally considered punishment, since, as you say, they haven't been found guilty of anything, but they often end up serving that purpose. Many convicted of misdemeanors are sentenced to "time served", plus perhaps a fine or community service.

      However, time served before a trial is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. We are talking about an entity which has already been convicted and is merely awaiting a reevaluation of their sentence. Name just one indiviudual who has been granted bail under those circumstances.

      In which case the obvious option when a corporation breaks the law would be to treat them in the same was as a criminal (or terrorist) organisation.

      The problem is, everyone who is a member of a criminal or terrorist is a criminal or a terrorist. Not everyone who is an employee of Microsoft is a monopolist. The vast majority of MS employees had no say in, or probably even knowledge of, MS' abusive business practices. How do you punish the company without punishing the totally innocent employees?

      no-one would use the excuse "going after Bin Landen, would cause too many civilan casualties".

      They would if he were in the US or Europe. Let's be honest here; it's not civilian casualties that are acceptable, it's Afghan civilian casualties.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    17. Re:Here's the reason by mpe · · Score: 2

      The problem is, everyone who is a member of a criminal or terrorist is a criminal or a terrorist. Not everyone who is an employee of Microsoft is a monopolist. The vast majority of MS employees had no say in, or probably even knowledge of, MS' abusive business practices

      Since criminal and terrorist organisations often have "legitimate fronts" and use perfectly legitimate businesses for various things then it's quite possible for there to be many people involved with such organisations which are perfectly "innocent". (If they are good enough to fool law enforcement then its perfectly likely theyc an fool their own employees.)
      Whereas with Microsoft just about everyone who works for them is likely to know exactly who they work for...

    18. Re:Here's the reason by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      Since criminal and terrorist organisations often have "legitimate fronts" and use perfectly legitimate businesses for various things then it's quite possible for there to be many people involved with such organisations which are perfectly "innocent".

      And yet these innocents are still not terrorists or criminals, merely employees of someone who is. But, if the head guy of a corporation gets arrested, the business doesn't necessarily go under since the business is not technically the property of the boss, even if he is the majority (or perhaps even sole, I'm not sure of the details) stockholder. If the business itself is doing something illegal, it's the opposite. The boss or the stockholders can't necessarily be held accountable. That's the whole purpose of creating a corporation.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  7. No... by BrianGa · · Score: 3, Redundant

    It's not the fact that they are giving away Demos, it's the place that the demos are being placed. A tie-in with a US Government agency is new.

    1. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah. Get those American Heart Association adverts out of there too!

    2. Re:No... by RealTimeFreeAgent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US Post Office is a semi-private agency. It's entirely self funded, but there is congressional oversight.

      The Post Office, due to poor management, is running a _BILLION_ dollar deficit right now. So it's no surprise to me that the USPS is looking for other sources of funding. Basically, it's either this, raise the price of stamps (something they proposed to Congress and they got slapped down for), or a hefty government bailout at taxpayer expense.

      --
      "You get what you pay for after all." --
    3. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always felt that they ought to raise stamp prices in 5 cent increments. It would give them a little extra money to hold off prices increases for a while.

      29 cents? Why couldn't they have just made it 30?

      Now it's 33 cents (or 34 cents, I don't remember anymore). If they just made bumped it up to 35 cents, they'd have an increase of about 3% in revenues (roughly speaking).

    4. Re:No... by BrianGa · · Score: 1

      You speak of 5c/stamp as if it were nothing. To a large company that sends out many mailings (bills, advertisements, paychecks, etc), that is a huge cost.

    5. Re:No... by xonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We should double the cost of bulk-rate advertisements, rather than giving them a cut-rate. Why subsidize mail that no one wants?

    6. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, more power to them. I haven't used snail mail in almost a year now. All my bills are either directly withdrawn from my checking account, billed to a credit card, or I can pay them through a web site using one of the above two methods manually. No need for stamps anymore at all. I flatly refuse to use any services that I can't pay for electronically or over the Internet... at the very least they must have over the phone billing. The USPS can die a horrible slow painful death for all I care. The only thing it brings me are bills and spam. The bills I can get online the same way I pay them and the spam.. well, I get plenty of spam through e-mail already.

    7. Re:No... by version3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My guess is that the opposite is true-- the mass-mailers subsidize us. Not sure what alternatives they would have if the USPS did put the screws to them, but I suppose they don't want to piss them off or make them go broke.

      Although... Joe Schmoe can do a lot of his keeping-in-touch with email, while the massers are pretty stuck. Especially if anti-spam laws take off.

      --
      "Can I say you're my lovepuppy?" Founding member of SODAMNHOTT
    8. Re:No... by superpeach · · Score: 2

      Demos of XP?
      Is this a fully functional version of XP which will upgrade your machine from win9X/2K/whatever to XP and work for 14 days then force you to buy it? or is it just the equivalent of a pretty shockwave animation.

      If it is the former, wouldnt it trick a few people into paying for XP when they dont actually need it? just because the messages say "buy me or lose your work" ?

    9. Re:No... by margaret · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Post Office, due to poor management, is running a _BILLION_ dollar deficit right now

      Then why do they do things like sponsor the Olympics? I wouldn't be annoyed with postage increases if they weren't subsidizing stupid PR stunts like this.

      -margaret

    10. Re:No... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I flatly refuse to use any services that I can't pay for electronically or over the Internet... at the very least they must have over the phone billing.

      What will you do the next time you need a plumber?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    11. Re:No... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I own and operate a movie theatre in a small town. I send out a monthly flyer with the coming month's movie schedule on it.

      I say (without exaggeration) that 95% of the people who receive my flyer want it; everyone takes it home and sticks it on their fridge. If someone doesn't get his flyer or loses it or something, they are in to the theatre right quick to pick up another copy. Even people who don't come to the shows keep the flyer -- "the grandkids might come to visit".

      Not all "junk mail" is junk.

      Unfortunately, because I don't send out a sufficiently large volume of flyers by mail ("only" 3072 each month) I don't qualify for a "contract distribution rate" and get hosed by the post office on the cost of delivery.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    12. Re:No... by xonker · · Score: 1

      Not all "junk mail" is junk.

      Agreed, but even if 95% of 3,072 people do want your flyer (and, no offense, that still sounds high but I'll take your word on it) I'd bet that the other 99% of the bulk mail that they get is unwanted.

      Also, if your flyer runs $.34 per to send to 3,072 people that means that you spend $1,044.48 per month to send a flyer. Also, you reinforce my point -- you're a small business person, sending out something people want, but you pay full rate. Marketing companies that slap together those coupon/flyer things that include everything from carpet cleaning to pizza coupons that usually get trashed -- they send them at a lower rate. Why should they get a lower rate than a business that is sending flyers that are wanted?

      You didn't specify what kind of flyer it is, so I have no idea what the production cost is for it, so let's just double the cost of postage -- you spend $2,088.96 per month to send out a flyer to increase your business. (I sincerely hope that you'd continue to have patrons without the flyer...)

      That means that, rounding the cost up to $2,100 per month, you need to sell 350 movie tickets (you said small town, so I'm figuring $6 per ticket...I live in Denver, so I'm out of touch with small town movie prices but I figure that's about average these days...) to recoup the cost of the flyer.

      If you're a savvy business-person, you wouldn't have continued doing this unless the flyer brings in far more business than the cost of doing the flyer itself, so I'm guessing that those 3,072 flyers generate (on average) at least two ticket sales per flyer -- meaning that you probably sell at least 6,144 tickets a month based on the flyer reminding someone that there's a movie that they want to see, and they might not have come otherwise. At $6 a pop, that's $36,864 per flyer run -- and it doesn't count popcorn or soda that those folks might purchase while seeing a movie.

      After deducting the cost of the flyer, that leaves you with about $34,755.04 added income thanks to the direct mail ad.

      So, I'm guessing that it would be worth the cost at twice the price to continue sending the flyer.

      But, most companies who send direct mail do so to lists purchased from other companies or gathered through other means -- and a good response rate on a direct mail campaign is about 10%, less for some markets. Your response rate is probably much higher.

      My point here is that you'd probably continue to do these mailings even at a higher cost. Many of the companies who send unwanted direct mail would have to discontinue at a higher cost.

      Why is that a good thing?

      1. Less junk in my (and your) mail box.
      2. Fewer trees killed to send an ad that I won't read. (My apartment complex has a trash can right next to the mailboxes, and they pretty much have to empty it every day...)
      3. Lower costs for the post office.

    13. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He'll be even more full of shit than he is now.



      -Jigatroll: 10^9 idiots pissed off per post

    14. Re:No... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Well, your math is correct but some of your assumptions are not.

      I am Canadian, not American, so I deal with Canada Post, not the USPS.

      I said that I don't get the "contract distribution rate" for my flyers but that doesn't mean that I pay first-class mail postage for them. They actually cost... hmmm.. without actually getting the receipt out and looking at it, it's something like 10.2 cents each for postage, plus a total of $12-and-some-cents for "freight" (ghawd knows why they do it that way). It's just over $300/month for mailing the flyers, plus $215 for printing the things, plus another $105 to the local newspaper for distributing them in the paper. The "mail-out" flyers go to the little towns around here, "in-town" get their flyer in the weekly newspaper (who charges me 5 cents each), about 2100 flyers in-town, 3072 out-of-town. I get 5500 flyers printed each month, which leaves me with a few hundred to keep at the theatre for hand-outs.

      I've never run my theatre without printing the flyer, but some guys I know who have tried it both ways in other small towns report that their business literally triples when they send out a flyer, so the cost of printing and distribution is indeed justified. I couldn't survive on 1/3 of my current business.

      The movie business runs on "hype", and it does me no good to be playing the hottest movie around if nobody knows that it's here.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    15. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually no. the mass-mailers pay but a fraction that we do. we subsidize them. a great deal.

    16. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the USPS has almost always ran a major deficit. There was some trikery played with the accounting during the 80's to lower it, but it still bleed red.

    17. Re:No... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      bulk rate is vastly cheaper than first class. It's possible that the profit margin is higher, but I can't really imagine that it is - there's not that much additional overhead on first class mail thats not there with bulk rate.

    18. Re:No... by wwi · · Score: 1

      It is not even semi-private, it receives major
      support from you and me, the taxpayers.
      They pay no tax on the fuel they use,
      they do not license their vehicles
      in any state,
      all activities occurring in a PO
      are protected by federal law, not
      state law, etc, etc. If UPS had
      these statutory benefits, it would be
      more profitable, too.



      There was a major confrontation with
      congress before Sept 11, because
      the PO was spinning out of control. They
      were warned to get their act
      together, and they have not, because
      they are a huge, bloated burocracy.
      Their visit with congress after
      Sept 11 was just another attempt
      to get bailed out. Just like
      AmTrack, which managed to tell
      congress that they needed billions
      post-Sept 11 to keep running. Exactly
      what happened Sept 11 to AmTrack is
      a mystery. It is clear that
      nasty things happened to the USPS,
      but that does not excuse near-criminal
      mis-management.


      They have already tried a number of stupid ideas
      to try to increase revenue in the Post
      Offices themselves, and most of these
      have been ridiculous failures. KMart
      can do a better job of retailing. The
      PO's are now full of ties and
      other junk they cannot
      sell, all now being sold off below
      cost.



      Who pays for these failed retailing
      attempts? Whenever you send a letter,
      package, etc., its factored in. In spite
      of trying to cover such failures, they
      are still in the hole. The only
      way out is to do as many otherwise
      socialist countries have done
      in Europe: make it completely independent
      and make it pay its own way with
      no federal crutches.

  8. In Other News... by Wire+Tap · · Score: 0, Funny

    This just in from the Associated Press:

    The USPS has advertisements up in (gasp!) the Post Office! Ads will promote the various stamps offered by the federal business, as well as provide people with ideas for valuable services that they may have not known about prior to seeing the ads.

    Really... what is the big deal here, and WHY is this news? Moreover, what if it was Linux, the God of Slashdot, that made an appearance in the Post Office? I bet the article would read something like "LINUX STORMS THE POSTAL SERVICE - OPEN SOURCE ON THE RISE! PRAISE LINUS AND GNU!"

    Please.... give me a break. The FUD is out of control.

    --

    Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.

    1. Re:In Other News... by MentlFlos · · Score: 1
      Well, first off I don't believe this is FUD at all. It is more a "WTF?" kinda thing. I am squarely in the "WTF" category myself.

      It's not that this is a freebee that makes me cock my head in confusion. It is the fact that they are doing it at a government office. I would be equally confused if Linux ended up in the USPS too. It just dosen't seem.... I dunno, kosher?

    2. Re:In Other News... by Wire+Tap · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but Post Office advertising is nothing new. Can you say "Stamps"? Look on a stamp. Chances are, if it doesn't say LOVE on it, there is an ad for SOMETHING. Wheter it be political (space exploration, women's causes, etc...), celebrational (Madonna stamps come to mind), or any number of other messages.... Stamps have always been an advertisement medium, whether you recognize it or not. Maybe that's the best part - you don't!

      At any rate, the Postal Service has always been a BUSINESS. They need MONEY. They are not entirely a government entity. There is NOTHING wrong with selling space in their domain.

      That was the point of my other post... but apparantly some zealous Slashdot 1337 dEwD thought it was flaming. Go figure.

      Adios.

      --

      Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.

    3. Re:In Other News... by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wheter it be political (space exploration, women's causes, etc...), celebrational (Madonna stamps come to mind), or any number of other messages.... Stamps have always been an advertisement medium, whether you recognize it or not. Maybe that's the best part - you don't!

      That's not quite true. Stamps have certainly not been used as a commercial advertisement medium (i.e. to sell a product, a real product). If there have been cases -- of which I've never heard -- then they are few and far between. You confuse commercial advertisement with awareness/recongition (women's causes, Madonna), national/patriotic endeavours (space exploration). The other messages fall in those categories, as well as artistic, historical, geographical, animal and fauna, symbols, and so on - but none of these have anything to do with a commercial product or service.

      The Postal Service has never been "just" a business - otherwise it would have sunk long ago - it is a semi-private government service (it's the same here in Canada as in the U.S.). That's quite different, and if you don't understand this then you don't really understand what business is (not to mention the nature of capitalism).

      As far the Microsoft ads goes, I don't know how it is in the states, but in Canada we don't have ads from major corporations, except in the rare cases when there are joint projects with the Postal Service. But plain ads, and from as big a company as Microsoft? No. I have to say, ads in a government service for a company (and not just any company, THE company) which the government is suing in Federal court? That does sound quite absurd, even for the U.S., famous for not doing things the same way as anyone else... :-)

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    4. Re:In Other News... by ThePlumber2 · · Score: 1

      ? Who the hell says that anyone should be able to advertise in a "PUBLIC" place? I PAY for that fucking building.... I don't want to see anyone advertising in it! Why should they advertise? I pay taxes so that they get salaries (The mailman).

      How about us putting in "Drink Pepsi" signs in our pre-schools then...... Maybe Pepsi will pay for pencils eh?!

      This class brought to you by Pepsi (Troy Mclure ?)

      --
      Thanks, Steve
    5. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually you pay for the postmans salary when you send a letter. And lately the post office has been losing money. It needs things like this to keep its head above water so get a life and move on. And...reguarding the pepsi/preschool thing, it already happens. I just graduated high school last year and in our school we had advertisements on the walls, in assembly's, on bookcovers, and really anywhere one would fit and for everything from Chevrolet to Pepsi.

    6. Re:In Other News... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      in Canada we don't have ads from major corporations, except in the rare cases when there are joint projects with the Postal Service.

      At our friendly local Canada Post office, I can purchase Harry Potter coins, Shrek coins, Christmas cards by the box ("on special" now for 50% off), t-shirts, "collectible coins" in fancy jackets, as well as packing tape, cardboard boxes, envelopes and so on.

      Yes, this is the Crown corporation post office. Not one of the private "postal facilities" in a drugstore or anything like that.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    7. Re:In Other News... by filmnorthflorida · · Score: 1

      uh... we do that already. at least here in florida. it's called "Partners in Education"

      the partners get big ads and basically whatever else they want from schools (exclusive drink machine franchises, 42 virgins for the corporate christmas party, etc.) and in return the school gets pencils, construction paper, free pizza, and so forth.

      hell, my high school had a Microsoft Computer Lab bought and paid for, with plenty of ad space, by a MSFT grant.

      --
      --- php: perl hates people
    8. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is the Crown corporation post office. Not one of the private "postal facilities" in a drugstore or anything like that.

      Are there any of those left? lol

    9. Re:In Other News... by Archie+Steel · · Score: 1

      That's true, but the Shrek and Harry Potter coins, IIRC, are a joint venture with Canada Post (or the Canada Mint, I'd have to check)...it's not as if they were advertising a line of Harry Potter toys sold at The Bay. What I mean is that all ads you'll find at a Postal Service in Canada are for products which are in part offered by it (i.e. it profits from their sale, not just from advertising revenues). There's a subtle difference, but it's an important one. It's not as if the USPS was getting a cut on every copy of Windows XP sold...

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    10. Re:In Other News... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is the Crown corporation post office. Not one of the private "postal facilities" in a drugstore or anything like that.

      Are there any of those left?


      Yes, we have one in the drugstore here in town as well. At the counter you can purchase stamps, mail a letter or whatever.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  9. Now it is our turn by MentlFlos · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lets all get our burners going and set up our own dump boxes next to the XP ones. Hehe, I would love to see people picking through trying to find their favorite "flavor" of linux.

    With my luck with moderators I will prob end up with -500 notfunnygoburninhell for this, but what the hell, I think it is a great mental picture

    1. Re:Now it is our turn by MentlFlos · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Flamebait?

      What is so flame-tastic about a joke? Oh yeah I forgot this is slashdot. No sense of humor at all...

    2. Re:Now it is our turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was probably some moderator not knowing what a dump box was. I honestly didn't know either until I read the article, it must be slang in the advertising field or something.

      However, you're probably on to something.. if Microsoft puts XP demos that die after 30 days in dump boxes in the front of Barnes & Noble, Redhat should do the same, only with full versions of their operating system. Maybe they can make money off of word of mouth and some support/documentation?

      Saying that, I hope that the general public doesn't decide to test out any kind of operating system (windows or linux-based) on their primary machine. It's a job best left up to computer techs and other computer saavy people. That is not exactly your average AOL user that found the AOL coaster in their mailbox one morning.

    3. Re:Now it is our turn by madenosine · · Score: 1

      Ooooh...joke...I get jokes! hahahahah!

    4. Re:Now it is our turn by Ageless · · Score: 1

      Does your sig mean that Windows is more secure?
      ;-)

  10. So what? by sulli · · Score: 2, Redundant
    And in other news, you can buy an AT&T prepaid phone card at the post office, and you can book a Hertz rent-a-car via Amtrak. We must save the taxpayers - nay, citizens - from this travesty of justice!

    Seriously, who cares? I bet if RHAT paid USPS enough, they'd put their CDs out too.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  11. I pick choice #1 by AdamBa · · Score: 3, Informative
    And am I simply naive, or is there something profoundly disturbing about such shenanigans going on even as District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly allegedly mulls the proper punishment of the Microsoft Corporation, an illegal monopoly, for violating U.S. antitrust law?

    You're simply naive. Last time I checked advertising was legal, even for Microsoft.

    - adam

    1. Re:I pick choice #1 by Fly · · Score: 2
      I personally hope that our post office or other government offices, such as maybe the FBI or IRS, start placing advertisements and "demo" bags of my favorite tea. I don't really see it as the government supporting their brand of tea but simply as a good way for the East India Tea company to advertise it's tea, which as far as I can tell is legal for them to do.

      How can anyone argue with this simple expression of capitalism?

      --
      end of line
    2. Re:I pick choice #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked advertising was legal, even for Microsoft.

      Well, it shouldn't be, because they suck!

    3. Re:I pick choice #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FBI may be looking for you after that display and all those demo cds are found floating in the Gulf of Mexico. They would prolly charge anyone who did that with dumping toxic waste.

      AC because it is a patriotic duty.

    4. Re:I pick choice #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do you.

  12. Free XP? by zmcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps I'm missunderstanding, but M$ is giving Xp away for free?
    Or are they giving software that runs on XP away for free?

    Which one?

    Heh, I wished they'd mail me a new Debian CD... I don't free like burning one... =)
    Oh well, I can suffer 10 Minutes of torturous burning for a lifetime of joy. =)

    --
    Location: Mt. Xinu
    1. Re:Free XP? by __aasfhc1949 · · Score: 1

      According to the letter [http://www.macintouch.com/postoffice.html], the cds inside of the post office were demo cds, and not the full version of Windows XP.

    2. Re:Free XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I don't free like burning one...

      Freudian Slip?

    3. Re:Free XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a demo. Must be run under Win3.1 for the full effect.

    4. Re:Free XP? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2

      So who's going to be the first one to realize that it's really the full version that's crippled by a couple of registry entries, develops a crack and posts the results to the web?

      This sort of reminds me of Apple's OS X.1 "update" CD that was really the full version.

  13. Though people will probably disagree by Techi · · Score: 1, Troll

    I think this is the first time I have seen a commercial product in no way related to mail advertised in a post office. Microsoft is now using the government to advertise its products. There is a distinct difference between something like this, and simply mailing a CD to you. This makes it seems like the USPS, and hence the federal government, is trying to sell you Microsoft products. This is very disturbing.

    --
    "You think that's air you're breathing now?"
    1. Re:Though people will probably disagree by PoiBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...And what's most disturbing is that this is the same government which has an anti-trust suit against Microsoft. So much for the left hand knowing what the right hand is doing.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    2. Re:Though people will probably disagree by sulli · · Score: 1

      USPS has offered pre-paid phone cards for years.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    3. Re:Though people will probably disagree by NullPointer · · Score: 1

      So, would you rather see an increase in postal rates or MS advertising in USPS? Personally, if MS wants to put up ads in all govt offices I'm all for it, as long as it decreases my tax burden, or in this case, my postage burden. Guess I see it the same way I see state-sponsored gambling, let the idiots pay and let me keep more of my own $'s.

      --
      NULL
    4. Re:Though people will probably disagree by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Come on now, when is the last time you actually *mailed* a letter? Most transactions to pay bills are available online now...eventually post mail will become a spam-filled memory.

    5. Re:Though people will probably disagree by jridley · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see an increase in postal rates. This is really bothering me. What's bothering me more is that it's not bothering most people here. I'd like to get more info first. Did MS pay USPS to place those? If not, then anyone should be able to place any ads they want in any post office. If so, then how much? Again, anyone should be able to buy space.

    6. Re:Though people will probably disagree by yy1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the Site

      United States Postal Service
      The Post Office Department was transformed into the United States Postal Service, an independent establishment of the executive branch of the Government of the United States. The mission of the Postal Service remained the same, as stated in Title 39 of the U.S. Code: "The Postal Service shall have as its basic function the obligation to provide postal services to bind the Nation together through the personal, educational, literary, and business correspondence of the people. It shall provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render postal services to all communities."

      --
      Because, sometimes they just have to touch the stove.
      -YY1
    7. Re:Though people will probably disagree by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Yep, now they'll be able to do the "Miracle on 34th Street" defense in court.

      (after having hundreds of demo CDs poured onto Judge Kotar-Kelly's desk)
      "As you can see, your honor, the US Postal Service, a gen-yoo-wine branch of the US Government, recognizes Microsoft's right to "innovate".
      Case dismissed!

    8. Re:Though people will probably disagree by nomadic · · Score: 2

      And yes, I realize I royally messed up the Judge's name.

    9. Re:Though people will probably disagree by NullPointer · · Score: 1

      No, you're right, I agree, it bothers me too. But I doubt there is anything I can do about it. I feel the same way about lotteries, I've been voting against and complaining about state-sponsored gambling for years and haven't seen anything change. Just trying to see a bright spot in an otherwise disturbing trend.

      If there is some preferential treatment of MS by the USPS then it is an outrage, and especially if that includes MS paying them by supplying "software in exchange" for the advertising space.

      --
      NULL
    10. Re:Though people will probably disagree by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, i mean this is no different that if they started selling heroine, or crack... big deal people.

      Microsoft broke the law, and Microsoft won...

    11. Re:Though people will probably disagree by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      So you would rather that the government act as a giant monopoly enforcing its vision? Maybe we can rig it such that if you have a problem with your taxes the mail person puts a lump of dogshit in your mailbox every day, and police and fire refuse to come to your aid! Genius!

      The US government is a very, very large organization, and there is no fathomable reason why they all need to be a borg collective. So the DOJ thinks MS abused its power: Go ahead and punish them, break them up, whatever, but that doesn't even say that the DOJ lawyers can't be busy typing the legal brief against MS on a Windows XP equipped laptop: Big frickin' deal. Just because they think MS busted a law doesn't mean they need to impose "punishment" outside of that through due process.

      Leave the extremism to the facists.

    12. Re:Though people will probably disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you haven't changed your address or anything else lately then.

      Ever pickup one of those address kits they have there? With cards to send to friends, the change of address to turn in to the post office etc? They are FULL of advertisements...pizza places, moving places, phone companies, you name it. The post office has been cashing in on advertisements for a long long time. Don't bash MS just because they are taking advantage of something that hundreds of companies also do. Frankly i'd rather pay a penny or two less for everything i send and have them advertise a bit for people, than try and take away the rights of all the compaies to advertise there.

    13. Re:Though people will probably disagree by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      As a sidenote: Here in Ontario certain branches of the government DO abuse their position in just such a manner. For example the government setup a deal with a private company to build and run a toll road (the 407 ETR), and this company (which is fighting in the courts to keep the deal private. Rather disconcerting given that it's a deal with MY government using MY tax dollars) mails you a bill. Well if you fail to pay your toll bill in time you cannot get a new sticker for your car, so basically if you don't pay this third party company (for instance maybe they billed in error, etc. There have been many instances of the license reading cameras getting the wrong number) suddenly you can't drive on any road. That sort of strong handing PISSES ME OFF: These assholes have every right to utilize the small-claims court, credit bureaus, etc, just like every other Joe who is owed money, but because they have the power of the government. Anyways that's why I'm irritated seeing someone calling for the government to basically do what Microsoft is accused/convicted of (which is abusing a monopoly position).

  14. not only that by Syre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    usps.gov has a marketing deal with Microsoft apparently. Their Web-Based Solutions page, accessable from the main usps.gov page, is "Powered by Microsoft bCentral", and promotes subscriptions to Microsoft services.

    Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

    1. Re:not only that by xonker · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      Since most of the reps in office seem to worship large corporations anyway, maybe the existing amendment would do?

      Probably not. But I'd sure as hell support an Amendment to this effect.

    2. Re:not only that by StuffMaster · · Score: 0

      separation of church and state is NOT in the constitution. Somebody forgot to take US History/American Government in high school

    3. Re:not only that by norwoodites · · Score: 0

      No it is part of the amendments which then becomes part of the Constitution.

      That is what amendments are for amending the Constitution.

    4. Re:not only that by The+Man · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      This phrase never appears in the constitution. Instead we have "Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion." Which any reasonable person interprets to mean that religions cannot be banned or discriminated against by Congress. It does not mean exactly what Jefferson wrote regarding the separation of church and state, though the ideas are interrelated.

      Now then, "No member of Congress, prospective member of Congress, or agent or representative of same, shall accept consideration from any person or corporation until his term of office shall have expired. Then he may receive consideration only in exchange for goods or services rendered, and only in reasonable compensation at fair-market prices. This prohibition shall begin upon announcing, publicly or otherwise, intention to seek office. Violation shall be punishable by a fine of the greater of one hundred times the value of the consideration accepted or one hundred million dollars. Furthermore, any bill proposed, sponsored, or co-sponsored by said member shall be annulled, and stricken from the United States Code, and that member's vote on all matters which passed before the member shall be null and void." might be a nice start.

    5. Re:not only that by wadetemp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The post office is not really part of the government, but rather a business run to support an important country function. Regardless of how its set up, it's a business nontheless. There's nothing illegal or even really that strange about this. In fact, the government has thier hands in other businesses much more than they do in the Post Office's. (Enron, for example.)

    6. Re:not only that by cornflux · · Score: 1

      it's not in any official government document whatsoever.

    7. Re:not only that by barzok · · Score: 2

      A separation of church and state is not defined in the Constitution, nor in the ammendments. It's slightly implied, but not really stated clearly. Rather, it was an idea put forth by Thomas Jefferson and people have taken it to heart as he was one of the largest players in the development of the US in those early years.

    8. Re:not only that by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 3, Informative

      > it's not in any official government document whatsoever.

      So I assume that you don't consider rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court to be "official government documents"...

      "The [First] Amendment's purpose... was to create a complete and permanent separation of the spheres of religious activity and civil authority by comprehensively forbidding every form of public aid or support for religion." U.S. Supreme Court, Reynolds v. United States (1879)

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    9. Re:not only that by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1, Troll

      There's nothing illegal about USPS partnering with Microsoft. What IS illegal, is if some company other than USPS delivers first class mail to you. That's a federal crime. The postal service, if it lost its artificial monopoly, would last about a week in the free market. Do you really think they could compete with FedEx and UPS? Efficiency is EVERYTHING with those companies. If FedEx moved all that volume of first class mail, a letter would cost ten cents to mail, get there in two days, and be trackable.

    10. Re:not only that by Peteresch · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      Yes, I know this is an offtopic rabbit trail...

      The other replies are correct in saying that it is nowhere in the constitution. The phrase was coined by the 17th century Baptist leader Roger Williams, and used by Thomas Jefferson on January 1, 1802 (11 years after the First Amendment was ratified).

      The U.S. Supreme Court, the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution's meaning, first utilized the phrase in the 1878 case of Reynolds v. United States, stating that Jefferson's term 'wall of separation between church and state' "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment."

      Over the years the Court has developed and applied what has become known as the "Lemon Test" to decide Establishment Clause cases. The Lemon Test, codified in the Court's 1971 Lemon v. Kurtzman, is a three-pronged inquiry:

      1) Does the challenged legislation or activity have a legitimate secular purpose?;

      2) Does the legislation or activity have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion? and

      3) Does the legislation or activity excessively entangle government with religion?

      Although individual Justices of the Court have, on various occasions, expressed dissatisfaction with this standard of review, the Lemon Test has not yet been replaced.
    11. Re:not only that by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you seen FedEx's prices lately? The reason it gets there in two days with tracking is because it costs about $10 to ship anything UNDER one pound. The reason the USPS exists is to ship mail reasonably quickly (compare the USPS to other national postal services and you'll see what I mean) and for a negligable cost. This isn't a very profitable enterprise, thus why the government runs it.

    12. Re:not only that by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The full clause is:

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

      Reasonable people from Jefferson on have interpreted that to mean two things: first, that the government cannot promote or support any religion, and second, as you say, that the government cannot ban or discriminate any religion. Like much of the Constitution, the First Amendment is a masterpiece of balance. Freedom of and freedom from religion are inseparable.

      Any other interpretation is not only unreasonable, but ahistorical -- remember that the people who wrote the Constitution had rather graphic examples of the horrors of state-supported religion within living memory. These days, at least in the US, we've largely forgotten how dangerous it can be.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    13. Re:not only that by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      Hardly. We need more of this. As long as Microsoft does not get any illegal favors in return, I love the idea of the government making money from corporations instead of taxpayers.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    14. Re:not only that by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Actually, I sent a piece of pottery (weighing several pounds) via Fedex's Express Saver (3 day) service. It cost $7.60, and was tracked and insured. To send a *LETTER* (weighing about one ounce) via the USPS's Priority Mail service (2 to 4 day delivery time, not tracked, not insured), cost me $3.50. The pottery arrived on time and without a scratch. The letter, which was sent TO THE SAME ADDRESS was bent and the envelope had slightly torn.

      So exactly which do YOU think is a better postal/shipping service?

      I used to work in a mom-and-pop mail annex store (sort of like Mailboxes Etc.), and I *ALWAYS* told people that, if they have any desire whatsoever for whatever it is they're sending to arrive on time and in good condition, they should send it through Fedex.

      The USPS's quality-of-service and delivery time is horrid, and if they actually had to fend for themselves and compete, they'd be run into the ground by Fedex and UPS _very_ quickly, IMO.

    15. Re:not only that by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      I guess that means that the government should not use the products of ANY corporation then? I guess the military should start building it's own jets, helicopters, bombs, etc. The Post Office should build their own trucks and planes for delivering mail. If your complaint is against the "Powered by Microsoft bCentral" on their website, then I guess maybe they can still use the products of corporations, but they have to peel off all the logos...

    16. Re:not only that by atomic+brainslide · · Score: 1
      Hardly. We need more of this. As long as Microsoft does not get any illegal favors in return, I love the idea of the government making money from corporations instead of taxpayers.

      ooooh, right - corporations grow their money on trees... sorry, i forgot.

      --
      check out my comic: Essential Tremors
    17. Re:not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logic wins again!

    18. Re:not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, Afghanistan should remind you how bad it is when a religion and state government get entangled... Both the religion and the state seem to get corrupted...

      Unfortunately, I think the same applies to the U.S. and christianity....

    19. Re:not only that by filmnorthflorida · · Score: 1

      so now we have freedom of assembly and freedom from assembly? wow. i wish i had that back when i was in college. wanders into frat house: "hey. i have a right to be here alone. says so in the constitution."

      or just "there will be no state sanctioned business" - so no amtrak, no post office, no public service commission maintaining the phone and power lines, no DARPA, no internet2, no human genome project...

      --
      --- php: perl hates people
    20. Re:not only that by mpe · · Score: 2

      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      Depends on the definition of "religion". Considering that many political organisations require at least the same level of faith as any "religion". With the line between "political" and "religious" having been blurred throughout history. Also OS advocates, of all kinds, are described using the same kind of terms as are used to describe religious (or political) positions.

    21. Re:not only that by mpe · · Score: 3, Informative

      The post office is not really part of the government, but rather a business run to support an important country function.

      Governments frequently set up organisations to do things which are eseential for their territory (and it's economy) to operate effectivly. Even if they superficially appear to be businesses the rules they operate under may be different. e.g. not having to maximise profit for shareholders, exemptions from planning laws, etc.

    22. Re:not only that by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      Read my post again:

      If FedEx moved all that volume

      The economy of scale dictates that higher volume = lower cost. If FedEx were allowed to deliver first class mail (which is a much bigger business than express delivery of packages) they'd drive down costs. There's no way to know, but I think FedEx would charge less than USPS for a first class letter.

    23. Re:not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another middle east country, currently embroiled in decades-old conflict, might also apply, no?

    24. Re:not only that by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, I think the same applies to the U.S. and christianity....

      Well, I think you're an idiot. When did the US and Christianity start getting "entangled"? When IN GOD WE TRUST was on our nation's first currency, (and still appears there)? Was it when "under God" was written into the Pledge? My understanding of the current state of state and religion is that is is becoming less and less "entangled". Seems like we're not doing much better for it, either. If you think religion is the the opium of the people, then I've got a red book I'd love to sell you...

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    25. Re:not only that by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      "In God we Trust" first appeared on U.S. currency in the late nineteenth or early twentieth century, IIRC. The Pledge of Allegiance itself is also about a century old, but the "under God" was added in the 1950's. So yes, both represent relatively new "entanglements." Certainly neither appears in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution ...

      Like I said before, the Founders had graphic examples, in their own recent history, of the horrors of theocracy. Since to modern Americans, religious wars and persecution are things that happen to poor people far away (N. Ireland, Israel, Afghanistan, et bloody cetera) we tend to forget the dangers inherent in mingling church and state. You'd think Sept. 11 would have changed that, at least to a degree, but our own home-grown theocrats (one of whom occupies the White House) co-opted it for their own loony beliefs instead.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    26. Re:not only that by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2

      Economies of scale also suffer from such a thing as the law of diminishing returns. That is, after a certain volume (which FedEx almost certainly already moves) adding any more to it will not significantly lower price. Supply and demand curves for shipping mail are not linear, so eventually the benefits from adding more load simply don't matter. In other words, if FedEx already has no problems filling up an airplane with mail, then it will not cost the end user any less if they have to fill two planes with mail. It just doubles their costs and their profits. The object of a business is to maximize profits, not be nice to the customer (though this is often a means to that end) so FedEx will not lower prices if it won't bring them any more cash.

      The USPS, on the other hand, is a government entity, and exists solely to provide a service. That's why it costs like $0.34 to send a letter. And like I said, look at the postal system of another country (Mexico, or even Canada) and you'll see that mail isn't nearly as reliable as it is here. Yes, it's not the best, but it's $0.34, so don't complain. "Priority Mail" and all that other junk is just the USPS trying to compete with FedEx and UPS using their existing infrastructure to generate some revenue to cover what's lost delivering first-class mail.

    27. Re:not only that by cornflux · · Score: 2

      i am talking about the specific phrase "separation of church and state"

      thank you.

    28. Re:not only that by Computer! · · Score: 2


      Certainly neither appears in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution


      True, but there are lots of other great parts of American government that also do not. If you mean that our nation's affiliation with theism was not part of the Founders' original intent, then point taken.

      James Pollock, Director of the Mint at Philadelphia, November 20, 1861 (note, closer to the Declaration of Independence than to today):


      Dear Sir: No nation can be strong except in the strength of God, or safe except in His defense. The trust of our people in God should be declared on our national coins.
      You will cause a device to be prepared without unnecessary delay with a motto expressing in the fewest and tersest words possible this national recognition.


      President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1954:

      In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of reigious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war.


      That loony Eisenhower... what a crackpot. He said that in regards to adding "under God" to the Pledge.

      Anyway, thanks for the history lesson. I didn't know how contemporary those devices were before, and you spurred some research, the fruits of which you see above. Thanks again.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    29. Re:not only that by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      > i am talking about the specific phrase "separation of church and state"

      So by your logic, "freedom of religion" isn't in the Constitution either because that specific phrase with that exact wording doesn't appear.

      "Church" is obviously a lay term for the more precise "spheres of religious activity" and "State" a term for "civil authority".

      > thank you.

      Your welcome.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    30. Re:not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...yawn...

    31. Re:not only that by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      A separation of church and state is not defined in the Constitution, nor in the amendments. It's slightly implied, but not really stated clearly. Rather, it was an idea put forth by Thomas Jefferson and people have taken it to heart as he was one of the largest players in the development of the US in those early years. Oh yeah... sure... just because you read it or heard it somewhere and can cackle like a hen in heat it must be true? BULLSHIT! In 1962 Madalyn Murray O'Hair Kicked God, the Bible and Prayer Out of Public Schools . . . And 10 Other Myths About Church and State http://www.au.org/myths.htm Thinking people might want to remember that blacks, women,& non-landownersdidn't have the right to vote then. Also remember that a sudden upsurge of anti-church mania didn't hit the Constitution makers back then either. There was a DAMN GOOD REASON WHY CHURCH & STATE ARE SEPARATE IN AMENDMENT #1 of the Constitution. The church was going nuts with power back then discriminating against other Christians (just as they do now)! It helps greatly to look at history along with the words of our Founding Fathers to see just how shameless a lie the current church is trying to sell the sheeple. When given absolute power, the church has proven time and again that they cannot restrain themselves from using it and abusing it for their own ends. The sad fact that so many "Christians" bear false witness, or bluntly, lie(It's in the Ten Commandments for God's sake! Which these fake Christians are so eager to get propped on courthouse walls and in schools and yet have never taken to heart) to get their way that they know little about the religion they proclaim loudly and endlessly to serve. Give these men of God the state's power and they'll abuse it again without pause or reflection. http://www.ifas.org/fw/9606/newengland.html (Article copied without permission of the author) Church and state in early New England

      By Bernard A. Drew
      The Pilgrims stepped ashore at Plymouth, first onto a firm rock, then sandy soil. This is symbolic of a young America: at first stonily exclusive in its religious tolerance and governance, then becoming more giving with the spiritual divergence of the population. The democratic urge which came with the struggle for revolution culminated in the adoption of a Constitution, and its Bill of Rights, which formally separated church and state.

      The Mayflower, with 102 passengers, most simple farmers and artisans, sailed for the New World in 1620 in search of religious freedom. They disagreed with the ritual and doctrine of the Anglican faith in England, and felt a loss of cultural identity in Holland, where they had taken refuge. Arriving north of the bounds of the Virginia Colony, from which they had secured a grant, the travelers forged a Mayflower Compact before setting ashore at Plymouth. The agreement to form a government was a compromise, as only a third of the voyagers were religious separatists; it referred to God, but allowed liberty of worship.

      However, a Bible commonwealth -- if not strictly speaking a theocracy -- emerged in practice, with the coming within a decade of another group of restless English. The Puritans crossed the sea, not to escape their mother country's state religion, but to establish it in what they felt would be a purer form. They wanted less "popish" ceremony. There was strict observance of the Sabbath. Frivolity was prohibited; Christmas ignored. Nonconformists and reformers, they were to be intolerant of any but their own church. Settling in Salem, the Massachusetts Bay Company held a broad charter to rule itself, admit members, bear arms, and defend itself.

      Clergymen didn't hold public office, but they advised magistrates on major matters. Elections were held each year by public assembly. But the privilege to vote or hold office was restricted to those who belonged to the established church.

      "They were advocates of a definite religious system, which they came to the new world to put into practice," asserted historian Herbert L. Osgood. "So important did this system seem to them that they made all interests, social and political, contribute to its maintenance and advancement."

      There soon arose challenges to the Puritan system. Roger Williams refused to take the pulpit in Boston because the congregation would not publicly renounce ties with the Church of England. He further challenged powers of magistrates and questioned the right to take land from Native Americans.

      Williams spoke loudly, and in 1635 he was tried and banished. He removed to the wilderness at Providence, and soon established a government which was the first in America to be democratic and with church and state functions separate. Wil-liams remained rigid in his own church, but the Rhode Island colony was openly tolerant of all sects. It became a haven for Baptists, Quakers, Jews and others.

      On Williams' heels, Anne Hutchinson in 1637 took exception to the Massachusetts establishment on religious as well as political grounds. She said that grace, not works, was the key to an individual's entrance to heaven.
      At gatherings with colonial women, she satirized sermons and criticized leadership. She said she heard directly from God -- grounds, the Puritans felt, to try her for heresy and excommunicate her.

      America's population grew, and it became more socially and religiously diverse. During the Great Awakening in the 1640s, Presbyterians and others asserted their need to worship in their own way. In 1849, Maryland passed the Toleration Act guaranteeing freedom of religion and protecting its Catholic population.

      Religiously zealous Quakers, believing in inner lights from the Holy Ghost, came to this country in the 1650s with missionary purposes. They were particularly vilified by the Puritans. Punishment for a first conviction of Quakerism was one ear cut off; for a second offense, the second ear, and for third, the tongue bored with a hot iron. Mary Dyer, a persistent Quaker, ignored her banishment once too often and was hanged in Boston in 1660.

      Cracks in the Puritan bulwark appeared from within as well. The second generation began to draw away from the rigid church. This prompted a lowering of membership requirements in 1662.

      There was a general rationalist movement of thought in Western culture. The British Crown, reacting to an age of enlightenment in Europe, signed a Declaration of Indulgence in 1687 giving toleration to Quakers, Baptists, and Episcopalians. The Crown revoked Massachusetts' charter in 1684, partly because of discrimination issues, and in rewriting Massachusetts' charter in 1691 removed a religious test for voting.

      A last gasp of the Puritan iron hand came with the Salem trials in the 1690s, when Cotton Mather and others stirred fear of rampant witchcraft. Twenty died before public sense intervened and the debacle ended.
      Theocentricity was severely diluted in the colonies by the time of the American Revolution. The issue was slightly different in Virginia. A colony staunchly Church of England from the start, it allowed other faiths, but reserved tax income to itself. The Revolution tainted the Anglican church because of its association with the Crown. A fervid democratic spirit emerged from the war.

      Thomas Jefferson, convinced that government had no business in the affairs of man and religion, with the support of James Madison and others, prevailed with the Virginia Statue of Religious Freedom which was enacted in 1786. It established tolerance and disallowed the use of general tax funds to support a single church.

      The framers of the Constitution largely ignored religion in drafting their document. The only reference is to there being no religious test to vote or hold public office. The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights asserts that there be no abridgment of the right to worship, and that government remain neutral in matters of religion.

      In debating the Constitution at the Virginia convention in 1787, delegate Zachariah Johnston asserted that by not sanctioning a single religion, "You will find that the exclusion of tests will strongly tend to establish religious freedom."

      French historian Alexis de Tocqueville, writing in 1835, thought this was a paradox, but upon investigation concluded, "I know that, apart from influence proper to itself, religions can at times rely on the artificial strength of laws and the support of the material powers that direct society. There have been religions intimately linked to earthly governments, dominating men's souls both by terror and by faith, but when a religion makes such an alliance, I am not afraid to say that it makes the same mistake as any man might; it sacrifices the future for the present, and by gaining a power to which it has no claim, it risks its legitimate authority."

      Bernard Drew is a freelance writer and historian who lives in Massachusetts.

      © 1998 Institute for First Amendment Studies, Inc.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  15. What's the problem? by kimba · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here in Australia, anyone can stick things in post offices if they pay for it. There are all sorts of brochures and things, plus most of the larger ISPs and phone companies have free samplers and recharge kits there.

    I assume Microsoft's deal isn't an exclusive arrangement?

    1. Re:What's the problem? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Heh, if it's anything like the deal with the OEM's, it's probably illegal.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:What's the problem? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Well, it looks like we here in the USA are asleep at the switch. We've actually let another country beat us in finding new venue that can be sold out. This is supposed to be our core competency.

  16. I'm shocked by Shoeboy · · Score: 1, Troll

    Shocked to find advertising going on here. The next thing you know I'll be getting unsolicited commercial snail mail from local retailers. This must be stopped!

    From now on I'm only buying from companies that don't advertise or give away freebies. Novell is probably the best bet. They've shown a complete inability to market Netware for years now.

    --Shoeboy

    1. Re:I'm shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netware is marketed on it value (as apposite the marketing devions) which beats the hell out of M$

  17. What the hell by xg0blin · · Score: 1

    Everytime I buy a video game magazine, or go to babbages I get a free demo cd of some sort. AOL sends me 3000 a week. Who really cares if microsoft tries to advertise through the post office. I dislike Microsoft somewhat as well, but I assure you, my reasons are better than this.

  18. a demo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How does a demo of an operating system work anyway? I would say that only the computer saavy would want to install a trial of an operating system. It's definitely not for the average user.. Are they including VMWare or something? At least that way you wouldn't have to dual-boot your existing home system.

    1. Re:a demo? by CDWert · · Score: 2

      Uhhh, thats the point MS demo's pretty much hook you into it. One day you cant log on to your W2K box, or start getting DB connection errors from SQL, because you installed a demo and forgot, (I did this in a dev enviroment) solution, put the purchased one on, or buy a serial in the case of XP ,or in the case of SQL server roll your clock back, actually early W2K server demo's too. I doubt XP is as stupid

      They get it on and you have little choice as I belive you cannot easily unistall XP (may be wrong with all the SxS dll mapping it would be tough I think) Soooooooooo, with the new MS authenitication you cant just pick up a number off a SeRiALZ site, but Mr VISA and 199 will get you the pro version and they'll activate it over the phone :)

      Hell if I was an evil megolitic corporation and a billionaire goober that ran it and had more money than god, I'd do it too , cant blame em for trying :)

      --
      Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    2. Re:a demo? by slimme · · Score: 1

      Do they advertise this on the demo CD's? Or should they?

    3. Re:a demo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should definitely make that clear on the front of the CD. Of course this assumes that the CD offers to replace your existing operating system with a 'demo' of XP Home that dies after 30 days and thus forces you to pay money to M$ or reinstall your old OS. As evil as Microsoft is, they really should take some responsibility for the proper operation of people's property. By not informing the unsuspecting user of what they are actually installing ("Oh XP, isn't that the Word/Excel upgrade?"), I would imagine that many people who use the demo will be in for a surprise when their computer stops working one morning and demands $100 to function again.

    4. Re:a demo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS stuff is even better than this. from win 98 and up (inculding win2k,xp)(I foget about 95 thouhgh because its been a while)

      Windows formats your hard drive,
      installs,
      then asks for the serial nummber (what do I do now that relize that my manuals in a box is in storge)

    5. Re:a demo? by Ageless · · Score: 1

      Probally the same way any other demo works. It's an animated tour of the OS, the new features, the web, chat and all the other wonderful things that you can do with Windows XP.
      Think outside the hat a bit.

    6. Re:a demo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can uninstall from an upgrade of 9X/ME. You cannot uninstall from an upgrade of 2000/NT.

      Thank you, come again.

  19. so what? by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate M$ same as everybody else but who cares? They paid some dough and the post office put up a display. Anybody could do it if they had the money.

    The Post Office isn't some holy place, it's barely connected with the government, and hasn't received any tax dollars since Nixon. It's basically a private organization.

    When you see Windows product placement in, say, a courtroom, that's when I'd start to worry....

  20. Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much of this marketing ploy will MS try to pass off as "restitution"?

  21. Forbidden demo by motox · · Score: 1

    Since when giving away free demos is forbidden ? Is that a demo version of the OS or a demo cd with informations about the OS ? IBM used to give away OS/2 CDs for free in italy...

  22. What.The.Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is your deal, Timothy? Did something crawl up your ass and plant the idea directly in your mind that this is fucking news?

    1. Re:What.The.Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it was Jon Katz. He's a sneaky little bugger.

      Next on Slashdot: Microsoft selling Office XP in CompUSA!!!! Oh, the injustice of it all!!

  23. When did Hell start co-locating at the post office by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, okay maybe it's not hell yet, but I'll know I'm in hell when the Johova's Witnesses start going door to door and handing out MS CD-ROM's.

  24. Demo the OS? by filtersweep · · Score: 2

    Did I read that correctly? Who would actually demo an OS?... they are not exactly the easiest thing to uninstall (maybe that is the rub after the "demo period" ends... for only $99 you can restore your PC to working condition).

    It still is a very strange marketing ploy when you consider WHY people upgrade OSes... it is generally not an impulse move. Half the outboard hardware on my DAW is not yet supported by XP.

    --


    Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
    1. Re:Demo the OS? by Gheesh · · Score: 1

      Not an impulsive move? Then why on Earth people kept buying Windows 98, 98SE, ME, when it was basically the same stuff every time? (only big difference I found were disk requirements, which always increased)

    2. Re:Demo the OS? by filtersweep · · Score: 2

      Uh, I'm still using win98... I never did find a reason to upgrade. I will try an OEM of win xp, but I'm not looking forward to it...

      As I recall, win 98se and ME were released with great hype, but the public was ho-hum.

      I seriously think most people upgrade when they buy a new PC... I feel queasy even saying this, but these days, the OSes seem to outlast the hardware. Four years ago you could buy win 98... four years ago maybe a Pentium II 350 was the bleeding edge.

      --


      Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
    3. Re:Demo the OS? by joe90 · · Score: 1

      "Did I read that correctly? Who would actually demo an OS?... they are not exactly the easiest thing to uninstall (maybe that is the rub after the "demo period" ends... for only $99 you can restore your PC to working condition)."

      Huh? Since when did Linux cost $99?

      I find that fdisk is quite adequate for uninstalling an OS. Besides, you wouldn't keep data on the same partition as your OS anyway.

      --

      Fast, cheap & reliable. Pick two.
    4. Re:Demo the OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fdisk? Isn't that an antivirus program from Symantec?

    5. Re:Demo the OS? by donutello · · Score: 2

      If you upgrade to Windows XP, you can revert to the previous state by selecting Windows XP from Add/Remove Programs in the Control Panel.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  25. First Anthrax now XP by smartin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The post office is crawling with viruses these days.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:First Anthrax now XP by governorx · · Score: 1

      roflmao. moderators should pick this one up. (maybe the wrong time though, its not funny if you have been effected by anthrax) not that any code monkeys would ever get any mail...

    2. Re:First Anthrax now XP by jimrandall · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Windows XP promotions are just another terrorist ploy......

    3. Re:First Anthrax now XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, except anthrax isn't a virus.

    4. Re:First Anthrax now XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're such a fucking fag

  26. This is the last straw! by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 1, Funny

    First anthrax in the mail and now XP CD's. The terrorists must be stopped!

    1. Re:This is the last straw! by lkaos · · Score: 1

      rotflmao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      mod the parent up [+1 Funny]

      thats probably one of the funniest things I've seen on /. in a while...

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    2. Re:This is the last straw! by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 1
      mod the parent up [+1 Funny] thats probably one of the funniest things I've seen on /. in a while...

      It would appear that the moderators don't share our love for sterling wittiness.

  27. Excellent! what are we doing? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    so why not produce a nice pile of SuSE cd's and have the "dump" say , not a demo the full real operating system... Linux! for FREE!" I'd suggest redhat but that takes 2 cd's now, and slackware is too technical.

    that'll take a helluva lot of steam out of microsoft's campain.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  28. Do something about it by wirefarm · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I 'll first admit that I don't know if this is legal or not, but I hate to think that tax dollars are being used to rent a space for Microsoft to do their promotions in such a prominent location.

    I'd complain to your postmaster and probably a letter to the editor of your local paper. Leave out any anti-MS rant, just complain that this is not the sort of thing that they should be doing with public space.

    If that post office is anything like the ones I've had to use, they have a fairly captive audience, bored to tears waiting in line. Microsoft brochures would probably actually get *read* there (Think of the money that supermarkets must get paid to feature items in the checkout lanes - gum, candy, tabloids, etc.)

    If you really care, see if MS paid money to do this, and to whom...
    Cheers,
    Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:Do something about it by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      The US Postal Service is a private company, I'm sure it's within their right to do this. Go ahead and write a letter to the editor, though, you'll fit right in with all of the other kooks.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  29. The Real Reason? by e1en0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would the Post Office let a competitor advertise in their building? I'm sure whoever uses XP will use email, which means less snail mail for the Post Office to deliver.

    So ... is the government trying to decrease the public's need for snail mail so they can lay off postal workers, or are they smart enough to know that XP is such a poor, insecure excuse for an OS that they know it'll crash and people will go back to snail mail and increase their business?

    1. Re:The Real Reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lame arguement.
      think.

    2. Re:The Real Reason? by e1en0r · · Score: 1

      bad joke.
      think.

    3. Re:The Real Reason? by Stackis · · Score: 1
      The "real reason" is so that the U.S. Goverment can monitor everyones email...

      M$ probably struck a deal w/the DOJ, to get everyone they can to install XP......we all know that Windows XP "phones home"......I think Big Brother is going to be watching the fools who actually install that silly OS...

      --

      "Look where we worship" -- Jim Morrison
    4. Re:The Real Reason? by mlong · · Score: 1
      Why would the Post Office let a competitor advertise in their building? I'm sure whoever uses XP will use email, which means less snail mail for the Post Office to deliver.


      Um, cause they get money from advertising. And they have worked with competitors before. Just look at Airborne

      --
      //m
    5. Re:The Real Reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, e-mail replaces 1st class mail ... a money loser for them. Like it or not, junk mail pays the bills at the PO. The more email / less snail mail ... the better the PO likes it.

  30. Take them all. by Rothfuss · · Score: 5, Funny

    The CDs are free. Take them all.

    Once you have a few hundred of them, you can gather them together with the myriad AOL CDs in your drawer and enjoy a nice day of CD Craft Fun as suggested here, here and here.

    Good luck.

    -Rothfuss

    1. Re:Take them all. by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I could use them as coasters in my living room. That would make a cool conversation piece!

    2. Re:Take them all. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would someone who's felt bold enough to walk off with all the free aol/earthlink/whatever cds in a store please post about the experiance?

    3. Re:Take them all. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I think it would be less obvious to just grab 20-30 at a time. Call 10-20 friends and go in one by one, and grab a handful. Do this every day, and eventually you will have thousands of them.

      Now, if we could only figure out how to make a Beowu... OK, sorry, I won't go there. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Take them all. by afedaken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At the place that I work, we've been using (UGH!) AOL for corporate e-mail, cuz it's fairly easy to use, and they've got POPs everywhere.

      Users manage to munge up thier software on a fairly regular basis. this isn't helped by the bloatware that aol calls a client.

      In addition they're constantly losing the discs that we leave at the sites, so I go and grab a stack of 30 or so it seems about once every other month.

      At the local Wawa (a Philadelphia area chain of conveinence stores) the GM won't let me take them.

      At the CompUSA, they're just glad to be rid of the things.

      When I couldn't find them at the OfficeMax, the clerk went into the back room, and gave me an entire sealed box of the discs. Of course, we do a lot of business with that office max, so I suppose YMMV.

      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
    5. Re:Take them all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the AOL CDs that show up as skeet. Maybe I should look for these MS demos.

    6. Re:Take them all. by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      Freshman year, there was a huge box of aol cd's in the mail room. We stole it, and my friends used the discs (along with some sticky gum) to wallpaper their room. They had the reflective side out, so it looked very nice.
      Even cooler (and this was my idea), one of them used the cd's to make the Batman symbol in their window. It was visible to everyone walking by outside and looking quite cool.

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    7. Re:Take them all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the office max near my house, the employees pretty much dared me to take them all.

      So I did. 600 or so.

      Then I got them home and thought, "what the fuck did I do that for?" and threw them all away.

      I contributed to a landfill for no reason other than boredom. Damn.

    8. Re:Take them all. by cosyne · · Score: 2

      Or you can bind them together into a solar collector. Mine is only like 6 CDs across right now but it'll get bigger next time i'm really bored.

      Or, i've heard of a science project using an AOL CD as an AM radio tuner. You apparently cut a strip of the aluminum out (across a diameter) leaving 2 slightly less than half circles (well, rainbows) of metal in the more-or-less intact plastic disk. Then you put it in the sleeve with aluminum foil on one face. The foil is in two triangles, seperated by a strip across the diagonal. Connect to the foil on the sleve, and you have a variable capacitor. When the strips are lined up, the capactiance is low, but if you rotate the cd the metal parts overlap and you get capacitance. Neat.

    9. Re:Take them all. by morie · · Score: 1
      Let's replace them with your favorite distro of Linux, *BSD or whatever turns you on. Make the people experience some real computing!

      Actually, I'm not completely shure just giving them a CD would do the trick, but one can always try... (As long as you live in the US, that is. Get working, guys! I'll watch for reports from the other side of that ocean.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    10. Re:Take them all. by Gromit+T.+Dog · · Score: 1

      A fun thing to do is place the CD in your microwave. Get a paper cup or something to place it on so that it is in the middle of the microwave. Now run the microwave for only 3-5 seconds. It is fun to watch and makes a cool pattern.

      --
      The world looks different in UV...
  31. OK, here's the question. . . by cgleba · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really don't care if MS advertises in post offices. What piques my curiosity, though, is what were / are government agencies' policies on advertising?

    I know that the MA Registry now allows advertising at their sites (somthing for people to look at during the long waits). It wasn't that way too long ago. . .

    I have never seen an advertisment in a post office that did not either promote USPS's services or was somthing about taxes.

    Was this by design, or was it that no one thought of advertising in a post office before :)? Could an advertsising policy cause bias in a government agency like campaign contributions cause in politics?

    It's not radical or life-changing, but it does have a large curiosity factor that I could not find much info on. . .

    1. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 2, Informative
      ... what were / are government agencies' policies on advertising?
      The United States Postal Service is not part of the United States government. It's (in effect) a private company, with a contract from the government to deliver mail.
      --
      Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    2. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      $ wget -O - www.usps.gov
      --18:32:27-- http://www.usps.gov/
      => `-'
      Connecting to www.usps.gov:80... connected!
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
      Length: unspecified [text/html]

      0K -><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
      <HTML>

      <HEAD>
      <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <TITLE>USPS - The United States Postal Service (U.S. Postal Service)</TITLE>

    3. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      Slashdot.org.

      Slashdot.com

      What's your point?

    4. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that while ANYONE can register .com, .net and .org (no, you do not need to be a non-profit) only US government agencies can get a .gov domain.

      Yes, the US is expecting the USPS to be somewhat self sufficient, but it is nevertheless a government entity. For example, I doubt the USPS would ever Chapter 11 eventhough they have never been particularly profitable.

    5. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

    6. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by og_sh0x · · Score: 1

      The post office is required to support itself through its revenue. One example of advertising they use to supplement their revenue is the advertisements for U-Haul, and other local services found in the "Mover's Guide" booklet that comes with the change of address form. Even the online version of Mover's Guide has guides to finding cable or satellite service, high-speed Internet service, long distance, etc.

    7. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by madenosine · · Score: 1

      This does not mean anything; the post office was once government owned, and obviously, many (maybe even the majority of) people still think that it is government owned today. The people who own the .gov domain probably see little reason in kicking uspo.gov out

    8. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, they have a web server! Point taken.

  32. The New AOL CD? by timdorr · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. Now if this catches on, I'll have to convert my AOL cd launcher to an XP cd launcher.

    No real difference, only it'll be even more deadly, so I'll have to install a safety...

    --
    Tim Dorr
    Owner/Manger
    A Small Orange
  33. At My PostOffice Also by brad_f · · Score: 1

    Yah, I picked up a demo cd for kicks about 2 weeks ago at my postoffice (Eden Prairie, MN - 55344).

    Kinda weird if you ask me... I wonder how much M$ had to pay for that display.

  34. They've been there a while... by xonker · · Score: 1

    I asked about them when I was at the local Post Office about two months ago...

    The response I got was that none of the money to run the Post Office comes from tax dollars, and they were paying for the space. This is part of the semi-privatization of the Post Office, apparently.

    It's not long until we're going to be seeing AOL and Microsoft stamps, probably...

    1. Re:They've been there a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, good move pulling them about it. Next time, though, tell the rest of us -- we might be able to stop the next influx of MS inappropriate bullsh*t if we catch it early enough.

  35. Microsoft stamp by DanThe1Man · · Score: 1

    pretty soon they will be coming out with a microsoft stamp. You can lick it, but you probably don't want to because you don't know whats in the glue. It will stay attached to the letter for a year, after which you have to pay an additonal 34 cents to reattach it. Ummm...the elvis stamp sues it for taking over all other stamps. Man, this was a stupid idea.

  36. Windows XP by The+BOFH+Troll · · Score: 0

    You know, Windows XP doesn't feel as good as CmdrTaco's small penis going up my ass.

    Wait, make that my wee wee hole.

    --

    - The BOFH Troll

  37. Tax money used to give Microsoft advertizing space by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    If the USPS were sold off for scrap, I wouldn't care who they let advertize in their buildnigs. I object to my money being used to pay for buildings in which Microsoft gets to advertize.

    The problem is that if I object by taking my money elsewhere, the TaxManCommith and I get taken away in chains while my money is removed and used against my will anyway.

    Now THAT is monopoly power. Too bad congress is exempt from their own anti-trust laws.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  38. Who cares? by caspper69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw this display, and now after reading this post I must ask, "What does it matter?" It's not as if MS is advertising in your local city hall or courthouse. It's the post office... A branch of the government that isn't responsible for anything remotely important (yes, I realize mail delivery is important, but it's not going to make or break my life/freedom either way).

    Not only that, but it's a branch of the government that's entirely self-sufficient. Not one red cent comes from taxpayers. So again I ask, what does it matter?

  39. Creative Crime. by BreakWindows · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, the "devious" flag just raised on this one. Maybe I can grab all the CD's, bring them home and burn new ones, chock full'of nice little additions...viruses, bugs, flaws; then put them back, shrinkwrapped and ready to go. "Hello, Microsoft? I just installed this XP promo and every time I boot up it invokes the name of Satan". Or, "sweet jesus, what's with all the penguins on my screen!?". Hey, maybe something as simple as a new office assistant that offers advice every 15 seconds.

    And for the smartasses...yes, new bugs over the ones already on there. I guess this would work with those AOL promo's too...but since no one would ever install those (as they already have 500) it wouldn't be as fulfilling.

    1. Re:Creative Crime. by J'raxis · · Score: 2, Troll
      Looks like you're trying to be funny on Slashdot! Office assistant can help you be a better karma whore! What would you like to do?
      • Worship Linux
      • Bash Microsoft some more
      • Try to get a first post
      • Claim *BSD is dying
      • Close this window
    2. Re:Creative Crime. by Heironymus+Coward · · Score: 1
      Maybe I can grab all the CD's, bring them home and burn new ones, chock full'of nice little additions...viruses, bugs, flaws; then put them back, shrinkwrapped and ready to go.

      you misspelled "a bootable mandrake linux install cd". HTH. HAND.

    3. Re:Creative Crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cowboyneal!

    4. Re:Creative Crime. by epsalon · · Score: 2

      bring them home and burn new ones, chock full'of nice little additions...viruses, bugs, flaws

      You mean burn an original WindowsXP CD? Got it all...

    5. Re:Creative Crime. by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
      • Prepend "My karma's going to take a battering for this, but..." in front of your post
  40. why is this noteworthy? by dimitri_k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Advertising with the post office isn't new. Ever change your address? This is hardly noteworthy.

    The postal worker in the article says that FedEx and UPS are doing the same thing. Why should the USPS not take a check to provide ad space?

    It'll help keep stamps cheap.

    --
    sig is
  41. Is it a demo or the real thing? by timdorr · · Score: 0

    Anyone actual get one of these cds and figure out what's on them? Sounds like just a promotional CD to me, not any actual copy of XP.

    --
    Tim Dorr
    Owner/Manger
    A Small Orange
    1. Re:Is it a demo or the real thing? by DorianGre · · Score: 1

      I picked up a CD today at the Post Office. It really just a digital brochure highlighting the following in one menu:

      Mobility
      Communication
      Digital Video
      Digital Music
      Digital Photo
      Connected Home
      Help and Support

      There is also a menu for:
      XP Overview
      Bonus Bits (such as:)
      --Free MSN
      --Bonus Movies and Music
      --Plus!
      --MS Games (Zoo Tycoon, Bicycle Card Games)
      --Office XP Demo
      --Info on Pentium 4
      --etc.
      A link to enter the XP Sweepstakes (http://www.windowsxppromo.com) which my DNS choked on.
      An Upgrade Advisor
      And a few links to get special offers and to purchase XP

      All done in Flash.

  42. Is this legal? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    I'm not a lawer, so I want to know, is this legal? Regardless that they are giving it away, it's still a advertisement, and the USPS is government funded, and regulated, even if it isn't government owend.

    Maybe a Lam.. er, Lawyer could help me out. ;-)

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  43. marketing? by f00zbll · · Score: 1
    Maybe I'm totally off the planet here, but here is an idea. Maybe XP is selling so bad, they are using the free CD give away to artificially increase the number of installed XP. There by creating the impression people are buying XP and bolster their image.

    I could be just too cynical

  44. Re:Tax money used to give Microsoft advertizing sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... the Post Office doesn't take your tax dollars any more. Hasn't for decades. They're entirely self-funded.

    If you don't like the way the USPS does business, I suggest you boycott buying stamps and sending stuff US Priority Mail.

  45. You know... by Vikki_R. · · Score: 1
    ...M$ is desperate to sell their OS when they resort to giving away free samples in the post office :p . I mean, seriously, doesn't that tell you something?

    Hmm, maybe all these free OS's (Linux, FreeBSD, etc. etc.) are getting to them even more than they are letting on! Heh heh.

    :)

    1. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A female that posts on Slashdot?? Now I have seen everything...

  46. Its called advertising. by Restil · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    The USPS is a business like any other. Sure, they have some governmental influence, both ways, but if someone wants to pay them to put up posters.... why not?

    And besides.. asking clerks about it won't get you very far. I'm surprised that your post office wasn't so busy that the clerk actually had enough time to ask you if there was anything else you needed.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  47. They didn't need to do that by unformed · · Score: 2

    They got those customers back as soon as the people realized getting "files for advice" in the mail is much less worse than getting powder.

  48. Re:When did Hell start co-locating at the post off by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

    You're going to burn in Hell for spelling God's nickname wrong.

  49. Just a link by rasactive · · Score: 1
  50. Windows Stamps? by Rothfuss · · Score: 5, Funny


    I'm looking forward to the "Great Operating Systems of the 20th Century" stamp series sponsored by Microsoft.

    There will be stamps celebrating such great operating systems as

    Windows 3
    Windows 3.1
    Windows 3.11
    Windows NT 3.5
    Windows NT 3.51
    Windows NT 4.0
    Windows 95
    Windows 98
    and
    Windows 2000

    Then of course there will be a variety of service packs for the 1 cent stamps.

    -Rothfuss

    1. Re:Windows Stamps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good.
      I thought the 1-cent stamps ARE the service packs ;)

    2. Re:Windows Stamps? by etceteral · · Score: 3, Funny


      Windows 3
      Windows 3.1
      Windows 3.11
      Windows NT 3.5
      Windows NT 3.51
      Windows NT 4.0
      Windows 95
      Windows 98
      and
      Windows 2000


      Aieee.... how could you forget about the flagship stamp: Bob?

      I can think of no better stamp to use on any "cancellation of service" letter to MS than Bill Gates' alter ego =)

      --

      ------------
      "...and Maddest of all, to see Life as it Is, and not as it Should Be."

    3. Re:Windows Stamps? by Locutus · · Score: 2

      You forgot that wonderful Windows NT 3.1 it's the one that made me start using OS/2. Thank gawd Linux grew up as IBM is putting the nails in OS/2.

      To bad only the BeOS came close to working as well as OS/2 but today, Linux is still better than Windows ANYTHING. That's not saying much but Linux does rock. IMHO.

      Does anybody else laugh at every "flag" Microsoft thows up to show the press it's listening? Security is the latest flag but that's really funny since it'll require a rewrite if every application they sell since there is no difference between Windows the OS and Microsoft Applications.

      Oh, where is Windows Millenium? And don't forget DOS 4.x, that was a "great" OS just as all the other Windows OS's. ;/

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:Windows Stamps? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

      Don't you dare forget your Windows 1.01 stamp.

    5. Re:Windows Stamps? by qweqwe · · Score: 1

      You forgot:

      Windows 1.0 (Who says Microsoft doesn't have a sense of humour?)
      Windows 2.0 (Used by early versions of Word and Adobe)
      Windows 3.1 for Workgroups
      WindowsME
      WindowsXP
      WindowsCE (and it's combinations)

  51. Coming and Going by Perdo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    another example of f***ed government. You pay for a stamp to send mail. You pay for a box to receive mail. You subsidize spammy junk mail catalogs because companies get favorable bulk mail rates. And now you have to veiw adds while you stand in line or check your box.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Coming and Going by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      Bulk mail subsidizes your stamps.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    2. Re:Coming and Going by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You pay for a stamp to send mail"

      And the post office loses money on it.

      "You pay for a box to receive mail"

      Or receive all your mail at a friends house.

      "You subsidize spammy junk mail catalogs because companies get favorable bulk mail rates"

      Companies get favorable bulk rates because bulk prebarcoded mail is easier to process. I don't think you "subsidize" it.

      "And now you have to veiw adds while you stand in line or check your box"

      OK, I hate ads too. But you're already bitching about your stamp costs. How do you want them to make enough money to continue their operations? I barely ever go into a post office--if it bothers you that much, you could probably avoid it too.

    3. Re:Coming and Going by elmegil · · Score: 2
      But you're already bitching about your stamp costs.

      Where exactly did the poster you're replying to bitch about stamp costs?

      As far as it goes, if I could get reliably delivered mail that wasn't shredded half the time, I'd be glad to pay additional postage. But since the USPS is effectively another government granted monopoly (or is it a goverment agency? Hm, wish they could make up their minds), there's no real competition for letter carrying to force them to be worth a damn.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Coming and Going by eyeball · · Score: 2

      Companies get favorable bulk rates because bulk prebarcoded mail is easier to process. I don't think you "subsidize" it.
      *nod* Mass mailings actually subsidize residential mail. If it weren't for the 'big bad corporations' that people around here bitch about, postage would be somewhere around a dollar per letter. It's a similar situation to the airlines, where they make most of their profit off of business travelers, and loose money on standard consumers.

      Personally I find their lack of design sense more annoying than a few advertisments.

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    5. Re:Coming and Going by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 1

      "Where exactly did the poster you're replying to bitch about stamp costs?"

      One of the things he was "f***ed on" was having to pay for stamps.

      "As far as it goes, if I could get reliably delivered mail that wasn't shredded half the time, I'd be glad to pay additional postage. But since the USPS is effectively another government granted monopoly (or is it a goverment agency? Hm, wish they could make up their minds), there's no real competition for letter carrying to force them to be worth a damn."

      Well, you could send the documents FedEx. They are competition for the high end, fast, reliable delivery market. The charge a _lot_ more, because they can't just lose money.

    6. Re:Coming and Going by elmegil · · Score: 2

      when I need premium service I can pay premium prices. When I just need it to get there sometime this month, FedEx is not practical, and not in any way in competition with so called "first class" mail.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    7. Re:Coming and Going by buck-yar · · Score: 1

      Shredded mail? How often does that really happen, I mean really... I used to work at the post office, so I know exactly how mail gets ruined (mail jams on the infeed belt on the DBCS), and it is rare considering the volume of mail sent.

      We would routinely process 150,000 pieces of mail in an evening, of which three or four pieces of mail got trashed. If it helps, a lot more third class (bulk mail) gets eaten by the machines than first.

      Regarding the post office as a monopoly... You really have nothing to complain about. Try sending a letter across a country for $.34 any other way.

      The only real incentive for the post office to make a profit is that the profit goes back to the employees. But the post office doesn't really want to improve their position. They are not competing against FedEx and UPS, they are merely complementing them. The USPS could never handle the volume of packages that would be generated should UPS or FedEx go out of business. Heck, FedEx carries a portion of USPS's express mail.

    8. Re:Coming and Going by elmegil · · Score: 2
      Shredded mail? How often does that really happen, I mean really...

      About once a month, because the mail delivery person tries to carelessly shove 4 or 5 catalogs (that I haven't even requested) through the mail slot along with a magazine that I'm subscribed to. About half the time the magazine is on the outside of the bundle and is the thing that gets shredded. Complaints get me nowhere.

      I didn't say my mail was shredded before delivery, it's shredded DURING delivery.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  52. Re:When did Hell start co-locating at the post off by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 1
    You're going to burn in Hell for spelling God's nickname wrong.

    Hukked on foniks wurkd phor mee!

  53. whats the big deal? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    the USPS is a public corperation. they need to make money and now they have turned to advertizing. PBS does this...infact, I have seen PBS shows with a 30 second comercial of Microsoft before it begins....it was one of those technicalish shows like Nova or somthing.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  54. Does anyone have a use for... by AntipodesTroll · · Score: 1


    A few hundred informationally-useless polycarbonate discs?

    Seriously, I'd like to find a reasonable use for worthless CDroms, seeing as so many corporations like to give away so many of them.

    --
    Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random numbers is, of course, in a state of sin.-John von Neumann
    1. Re:Does anyone have a use for... by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2

      You never saw that Target commercial where they had a room with the walls and ceiling painted red and completely covered with CDs?

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    2. Re:Does anyone have a use for... by spamkabuki · · Score: 1



      Seriously, I'd like to find a reasonable use for worthless CDroms

      I'm thinking about reshingling the shed in my backyard with them. Just layer them like fish scales to cover the holes. Mmm...Shiny pool shed...Shiny...

    3. Re:Does anyone have a use for... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of this, back when AOL gave out their software on 1.44MB floppy disks, they had a form online where you could request a free kit.

      I set up a script to request several hundred kits, and they actually sent them to me. A month or two later they put a little notice about "limit 5 kits per month".

      It was too bad, I really liked getting free High Density floppies.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  55. Demo Days! by Konster · · Score: 1

    Many years ago, I received a Win 98 demo with a magazine. I thought, wow, free OS!

    Well, it was a _movie_ of Windows 98 in action; a demonstration of the product and not the actual product itself.

    Which is probably what this will be.

  56. I'm firing up the burner by npietraniec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just the disks I have on hand... I'll make 10 copies of Red Hat, 10 copies of Mandrake, 10 copies of Suse, trek on down to the post office tomorrow and stuff them in the Microsoft ad. I encourage everyone to do the same :)

    Maybe scribble a sign overhead and tape it to the MS ad. "...Or use Linux!"

    1. Re:I'm firing up the burner by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      Freelinuxcd.org could put your burned copies to much better use.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:I'm firing up the burner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, instead of people just double clicking on Internet Explorer in XP, they'll have to learn how to download nightly builds of Mozilla to work under X! I'm sure consumers will love that!

    3. Re:I'm firing up the burner by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

      Yeah they seem to be working real hard....

      Thanks for your interest in requesting FREE Linux CD from FreeLinuxCD.org. All CDs allocated for this week have been reserved by other visitors. Please check back later to request a CD.

      FreeLinuxCD.org

      Time Last CD was Requested :

      October 31, 2001, 6:11 am (US Pacific Time)

      --
      I'm a minister!
    4. Re:I'm firing up the burner by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      The site was down for a long while due to a hosting problem. He has recently brought it back up and is going to start releasing disks again very soon.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  57. Now I can by jsse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    decorate my wall with free XP CDs, together with AOL floor floppy tiles.

  58. Question for RedHAT guys... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Granted I have been a redhat critic of late but I do have a serious question. what tools or help does redhat give to linux advocates to "get the word out". can I request 100 bulk CD's to give out? how about tri-fold pamphlets? MS is marketing like mad and the largest Linux purveyor sits quietly and only advertises in technical journals or the linux mag's.

    what if my LUG wants to stand on corners and give out linux cd's? I agree that RH7.2 is the easiest that even a non-computer user can install and use it.

    so what can I do to get it out there? and if redhat wont help what other distros will help by supplying bulk cd's? anyone?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try calling them and ask if they'd be willing to sponsor you in buying a burner and 100 cd's in exchange they get community-level advertisment, maybe they won't hang up on you

    2. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      dont want a burner and 100 blanks. I wan 100 pressed cd's from them ready to go, that would be cheaper than a burner and the 100 blanks (pressings cost aobut $0.05 each when purchased in 5000 or more.)

      the biggest question is why oh why doesnt the biggest linux company have a program in place to help lug's get the word out for basically free.

      Besides redhat.com guys hang out here alot, and they will see this faster than a receptionist fielding calls would send the message up.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      The whole Linux thing was never supposed to be about following corporate leadership, but instead about grass root efforts. So don't pull this "why doesn't Redhat..." stuff. Get off your butt and burn some CDs of Debian, Redhat, or whatever good Linux distro you can get your hands on... start giving that out.

      Something doesn't come from nothing. Redhat can't break that rule of thumb, and neither can you. If you have to dip into your pocket, then so be it.

      Linux is all about everyone chipping in. Its not about everyone pissing and moaning about what Redhat does and does not do. Though with the recent rumors of the AOL purchasing of Redhat and other things... it seems that people have forgot what Linux is all about.

    4. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 2
      the biggest question is why oh why doesnt the biggest linux company have a program in place to help lug's get the word out for basically free.

      Back in December of 1999, the Washtenaw LUG held a "counter-rally" in the U of M Student Union, in the same room where MS was hyping Windows2K and pushing Office. The organizers contacted Redhat, and they sent 500 CDs of Redhat 6.2 for us to give out. Don't know how much it helped in the long run, but Redhat was responsive to this. (So were Caldera, Slackware, Turbo, and SuSE.).

      The key is volume and visibility. Redhat is a business; they're here to make a profit. Sure, they want to give back to the community, but for some reason a 2-day event focused on software makes better sense for a mass CD distribution than sending out 3 or 4 guys to hand out CDs on street corners.

      It's all about organization. Contact your local LUG and set up an installfest and/or large public meeting for those interested in Linux. Once you've got the details worked out, contact Redhat a week or two in advance. Odds are they'd be glad to help if you can show evidence that enough people will be on hand.

      --
      Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
    5. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but for some reason a 2-day event focused on software makes better sense for a mass CD distribution than sending out 3 or 4 guys to hand out CDs on street corner

      Actually record companies and artists (e.g, Radiohead) have been taking the opposite view lately, hiring young guys (late teens and 20s) to go around and give schwag away. By advertising in a more subtle way, they don't come off as annoying and they still get the word out. It's relatively subversive advertising because it doesn't hit you like some 40 year old trying to push crap on you would, or a cd you get in the mail (Yay! Another ufo!). Linux could really benefit from something similar; although better schwag would help, linux has a bonus - you actually get the CD for free. Fsck me but I forgot the link talking about the advertising campaigns (CNN or such)... Anyway, I don't use linux right now - OS X at home and the W2k bug at work - so let that affect your judgement of my opinion however you feel is appropriate.

    6. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      "Anyway, I don't use linux right now - OS X at home and the W2k bug at work - so let that affect your judgement of my opinion however you feel is appropriate"

      OS X is a nice OS. It's much too slow on the hardware I have (Old-World G3 tower...) so I run only Linux and MacOS 9 on it. Win2k's probably a "no options" situation and I can understand- besides, while it's more of a resource pig than NT was, it's still better than it (Relative term, I'll admit, but it IS better).

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  59. If done properly. by Zapdos · · Score: 1

    The display would be next to the photos of those really nice people the police are looking for.

  60. New Merger, USPS bought out by MS by Mac+Nazgul · · Score: 5, Funny

    PR release:

    Microsoft announced today the acquisition of the United Postal Service. "It's a great innovation, that we know our customers will enjoy. Instead of being hassled by paper communication, our MSN and Hotmail service will provide all means of communication for the people of the US in a safe and secure way." said Microsoft's co-founder Bill Gates.
    While many questions have risen regarding the ethical and legal considerations, Microsoft was confident of the acceptance of their new program. With a surprise backer in the federal government, Microsofts program received considerable support from a Mr. DCS1000. Security considerations also came into play with the recent anthrax scares.
    The program launches tomorrow, with the initial transfer of all US citizens to the new MS PassportPlus for national identification (Win95/NT/98/2000/XP compatible). A new email activation program will also initiate, offering enhanced security against terrorist hackers sendign unauthorized digital signals.

    1. Re:New Merger, USPS bought out by MS by joonasl · · Score: 1
      Instead of being hassled by paper communication, our MSN and Hotmail service will provide all means of communication for the people of the US in a safe and secure way." said Microsoft's co-founder Bill Gates.

      Calling Hotmail and MSN safe and secure is like givin Osama Bin Laden a Nobel's peace prize.

      --
      "There is a terrorist behind every bush"
    2. Re:New Merger, USPS bought out by MS by giantsfan89 · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of the 'United Postal Service' before. Maybe 'United States Postal Service'? Or maybe 'United Parcel Service'?

      --
      Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
  61. Maybe This Explains... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Maybe this explains all the lost and delayed mail I've suffered lately...

    Padded mailer sent from CA to CO, still not there after one week

    Package sent from NV to CA, took 3 weeks

    Letter from Singapore, overdue

    I've never had so much trouble with USPS.

    "Hey, maybe we could make a BSoD stamp, Jerry!"

    "Shut up and reboot, the line is growing restive!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  62. And the Post Office Sells Warner Bros. Stamps. by Quarters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daffy Duck, Bugs Bunny, Wile E. Coyote. They're all there. They've done that for years.

    I've seen American Express application forms at the Post Office for as long as I can remember.

    I really don't see much wrong with this.

  63. Qauntum Erthum fergo Nu by hugecyberpenis · · Score: 0
    The real question is "what is" upset? You take a straw man argument here and in thus doing, profoundly underimplement the status of the conclusion. Why? What? How? Ha! You wish that I would somehow expound upon the tacit timarity of your pole? Ha!

    Remeber: the faster you go the more you get there without the definitive exploratory symposium of the second part. Cast not stones upon the wind for they are round, square, and irregular at intervals unknown to man.

    --

    This sig intentionally Left Bank.

  64. Beer Here by jimlintott · · Score: 1

    There is still a big difference between a free OS and a free OS.

  65. Why is this bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get all the complaints. Why is this a bad thing? Many organizations use the Post Office for advertising. When was the last time you got third class mail? Why isn't everyone complaing that their tax dollars are being wasted by sending them junk mail? For all I care, the Post Office could plaster their walls with ads.

  66. FREE COASTERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All interested readers should go to their local USPS immediately and pick up the free coasters and trashcan protectors Microsoft is distributing.

  67. Hahaha Ok mighty nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically what you are saying is:
    - Microsoft settled (out of court)
    - They are blowing it in our face.
    - You won't see another monopoly suit
    - Prices will rise. Unlike #2's stocks.
    - If you got the money you got the rights.

    hehe Law is indeed equal to money.

    God. I hope this isn't true.

  68. Regardless by iGawyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Regardless of your opinions of Microsoft, it's advertising. AOL has done the same for years, leaving their CDs or floppy disks everywhere imaginable.

    So MS puts posters in CDs into a USPS office? Big deal. It's not like you can argue that the USPS is a government office and the government is promoting it, the USPS is a government-contracted company, just look it up in your history book.

    If the USPS agrees to hang the signs, then they're there. Personally, either someone will or won't upgrade, and a nifty poster in a post office won't influence too many people, and certainly not the type who would use Linux.

    Call me a troll for not flaming Microsoft, but it's just marketing, not monopolistic business tactics. And hell, maybe the cost of postage will go down with the money that MS gives the USPS for putting the posters.

    Gawyn

    1. Re:Regardless by elmegil · · Score: 1
      Regardless of your opinions of Microsoft, it's advertising. AOL has done the same for years, leaving their CDs or floppy disks everywhere imaginable.

      Ya know, it's not much of a stretch of imagination to imagine AOL dumping CDs at the USPS. Yet, I can't say I've ever seen that done. Through the USPS, yes, AT the USPS, no.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:Regardless by elmegil · · Score: 5, Insightful
      it's just marketing, not monopolistic business tactics.

      And exactly where did the article say it was monopolistic business practices?

      Seems to me everyone is bitching because of the blatant conflict of interest on the part of the government. "One hand is suing you, the other hand is selling you advertising space that isn't apparently being sold to any other advertiser."

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:Regardless by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      Blatant conflict of interest? The USPS is not a fucking government agency. They are merely another government contractor needing to make some dough. USPS's management has nothing to do with a DOJ lawsuit against anybody. If there were giant MSN posters hanging off the sides of the White House it would be a blatant conflict of interest but not some poster in a USPS branch office. They are a private fucking company and can do what they want to make cash. I'd rather yet another poster at the post office no one pays attention to than 5$ stamps.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    4. Re:Regardless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been noted, they are a fucking govt. agency. usps.gov? The postal inspector can and will arrest your ass if he catches you shipping hazardous materials. Have you ever fucked with a mailman while he's delivering the mail? Its a felony. So is stealing somebody mail out of their mailbox. If you want serious proof that the usps is a real govt agency why don't you go fuck with them and find out how real they are by spending time in Levinworth. Fucking with the USPS is just as bad as screwing with the FAA, don't do it.

      From usps.gov:
      1775- Benjamin Franklin, first Postmaster General under Continental Congress. The usps has been around longer than The Constitution and The Declaration of Independence.
      The USPS has only been around since 1971

    5. Re:Regardless by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      Because a postal inspector can arrest your ass doesn't make them a government agency. They are a private business which happens to have an exclusive government contract to deliver mail within the US. It doesn't make any difference what laws are in place to keep people from fucking with the mail they are a private company and get cash by charging you money to deliver mail. You can get fined and jailed for interfering with a federally funded building project conducted by a federally contracted company but it doesn't make said construction company a government agency.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  69. Oh how terrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The post office is trying to make money. How sad for them.

  70. It's really a "Wanted" poster by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    Usually when you see posters on post offices, they feature people who steal valuable resources from citizens or cause them irreperable harm. Usually these people are regarded as being extremely dangerous and should be avoided at all costs

    I'd say that adequately pegs XP.

    1. Re:It's really a "Wanted" poster by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      No joke:

      I had a buddy print off 500 of those Bill Gates' arrest pictures.

      We will be distributing them around town.

      The best part, 150 are these:

      http://www.allyourbase.net/pictures/index.php/fa vs /large/gates.jpg

      I suggest people do the same.

  71. Thread from 12-5-01 by sfled · · Score: 1
    --
    I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
  72. Conspiracy or advertising budget? by kenneth_martens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do you suppose the post office is advertising for Microsoft? Is it a conspiracy designed to kill Linux?

    No, the truth is, Microsoft can advertise Windows XP because they have a large advertising budget. Linux doesn't get advertised nearly as much because Red Hat, Debian, Suse, Slackware, etc. are all operating on a very thin profit margin and can't afford the kind of advertising that Microsoft can.

    Now, the question as to whether the US Postal System should endorse or provide a venue for the promotion of Windows XP is another issue altogether. But it is important to realize that without Microsoft's advertising budget, this wouldn't ever have happened.

  73. What happened to common sense? by greygent · · Score: 0

    Christ...

  74. Re:Ass or titties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ass. no contest.

  75. Not out of place by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Just another criminal hanging on the Post Office wall. What's so unusual about that?

  76. I fail to see the issue here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see violation here. You see, the post office delivers mail for a nominal fee and it even does this for large corporations. In fact, there are special bulk mail processing facilities to distribute corporate bulk mail and the post office even seeks out business relationships with corporations to distribute thier mail (*gasp*).

    At worst there's a variation on the theme of "mail delivery". At best, I didn't open up my mail box to find another peice of anonymous corporate crap inside it.

    AOL frisbee anyone?

  77. Let's rewrite this, shall we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several readers, like this Anonymous Coward, have written with links to a letter from Eric Raymond on linuxtoday.com. "I stumbled across this letter submitted to a web site I frequent. Apparently Red Hat has promotional displays with free Red Hat 7.2 promotional software in U.S. Post Offices." This is great news for the Linux movement - at least the USPS isn't allowing Microsoft to advertise WinXP!

    Farking hypocrites...

  78. Cant Get It Off by didyaseethat · · Score: 2, Informative

    These XP demo's will "upgrade" your current 9x/2k install. This works great untill your free demo is up, and then you get the forced online authentication, exactly the same as if you didn't register a purchased version. Of course, since you cannot do anything with your computer aside from get the must register message you are officially SOL. Format and re-install, without any chance to back up your stuff. At least that is the story with my roomates PC.

    1. Re:Cant Get It Off by darketernal · · Score: 1

      That's disgustingly Microsoft. Either you pay, or you take the trouble to reformat and re-install. Looks like I'll be getting Windows 2000 instead...Any fishy registration business on that one? I don't think so, at least as not as much as XP.

      Ah well. (holds up pir8 copy of Win98 SE)

    2. Re:Cant Get It Off by donutello · · Score: 2

      Your roommate is an idiot, then. He can simply select Windows XP from Add/Remove Programs in the Control Panel and go back to whatever was on his computer before.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:Cant Get It Off by didyaseethat · · Score: 1

      Someone here is an idiot....that or they can't read.

      He could not boot into windows. The computer would only boot into XP's register your product now screen. I'm sure you have heard of it, ya know, product activation.

      Although, he did install XP.... maybe you are right.

  79. The post office doesn't take tax dollars. by TheMCP · · Score: 2

    The post office does not run on tax dollars, it runs on what you pay for postage and services. It also probably makes a profit on Microsoft's advertising.

    On the other hand my personal concern is, they're still the local office of the federal governement, technically, so how come they have ads up for a company and product that the federal government just successfully sued for being in violation of federal law?

  80. you infer it's actually an XP install... by wadetemp · · Score: 1

    Has anyone picked up one of these CDs? I really doubt it's a demo install of XP. You assume the target audience of this campaign is the same as the MSDN Beta/RC... it's very different. Novice users don't have the time, ability, or means to install a 30-day trial of an operating system.

    It's probably just a 20 minute AVI commercial for XP.

  81. Well, are you all just going to sit there by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    like a bunch of startled dugongs, or are you going to burn a batch of Linux install CDs and swap them with the XP demo disks? Use one of those "we make it look as much like Windows as possible" distributions, and you might just get away with it, too.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  82. Yeah, and the mail trucks, too... by berniecase · · Score: 1

    Those poor sweet little Grumman mail vans have also been plastered with MSN broadband ads up here in Seattle. Gah.

  83. The USPS needs money too! by Quixote · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The USPS does not get any money from the taxpayers. They have to earn everything themselves. Since 9/11, the USPS has lost Billions of dollars in lost revenue, anthrax hassles, etc. They have to make up the money somewhere! If Micro$oft came to them and offered them a large amount of money to put up such display cases, I'm all for it!
    BTW: the USPS does a tremendous job for the amount they charge for the postage. Have you looked at first-class postage rates in Europe?

    1. Re:The USPS needs money too! by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      Actually, the USPS uses what is called a use-based tax. You use the service, then you pay. In my opinion, use-based taxes lead to far more efficient government programs.

    2. Re:The USPS needs money too! by Quixote · · Score: 2

      Actually, the USPS uses what is called a use-based tax. You use the service, then you pay. In my opinion, use-based taxes lead to far more efficient government programs.

      By your definition, your local grocery store also uses a "use-based tax".

    3. Re:The USPS needs money too! by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1
      By your definition, your local grocery store also uses a "use-based tax".

      You mean my grocery store is a government agency? Kickass!

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    4. Re:The USPS needs money too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody hell, the US goverment own EVERYTHING!

    5. Re:The USPS needs money too! by uradu · · Score: 2

      > BTW: the USPS does a tremendous job for the amount they charge for the postage.

      Yeah, well, you get about what you pay for. Reliable mail service is largely an oxymoron in the US. I guess statistics alone might still weigh in its favor, but if I have anything that needs to get anywhere with any level of urgency and/or reliability, I will use FedEx over the USPS anyday. I don't know if that's still true nowadays, but when I used to use Deutsche Post in the '80s, their level of expediency and reliability was much more comparable to FedEx than the USPS. I guess service has its price.

      -

    6. Re:The USPS needs money too! by Quixote · · Score: 2

      but if I have anything that needs to get anywhere with any level of urgency and/or reliability, I will use FedEx over the USPS anyday.

      When FedEx starts delivering for $0.34, let me know and I'll also gladly switch.
      BTW: compare the delivery area of US -vs- Deutschland. Alaska itself is bigger than that.

    7. Re:The USPS needs money too! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      It largely depends on where you are sending to/from -- apparently, a few of the local post offices have some problems. However, with a few (localized) exceptions, the USPS does an amazing job. Mail generally takes 3-4 days to cross the country, and next-day delivery is normal within the same state. Even if they were to double their prices, it would be well worth it.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    8. Re:The USPS needs money too! by uradu · · Score: 2

      > When FedEx starts delivering for $0.34, let me know and I'll also gladly switch.

      Well, maybe there's such as thing as too cheap.

      > BTW: compare the delivery area of US -vs- Deutschland. Alaska itself is bigger than that.

      That is true, but doesn't explain the stack of munged letters I've received over the last decade. Tearing up a letter in a machine and then sending it to you with a simple "sorry" doesn't exactly qualify as "amazing" service. Passable, but not amazing.

      -

    9. Re:The USPS needs money too! by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Depends on the program. Used based taxes are also regressive. As long as the service is something that is not absolutely necessary. Imagine if everyone had to explicitly pay for the roadwork in front of their house? Want to use your road? It's a fixed fee of $500 a year. Well fine if your making 30 grand or more. Pretty shitty if your making 5 grand a year...

      As usual, things are about 10x as complicated as anyone on /. ever considers.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  84. demo discs by fuzbuster · · Score: 0

    when winME came out did they try and sell a demo version for like $30, crazy guys

  85. i'm not sure how much the usps is federal. by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    I say this because the usps is a corporation. It's normally listed as a fortun 500 company. As a result their add space is for sale.

    --
    -- john
  86. Mod this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had mod points I'd mod you up (though I never get mod points. I think I got perma-de-modded for going on a mod napalm strike one time). Very true: For all the yapping about the USPS being a "public" institution, people should realize that it is one government funded venture that should be as private-like as possible (indeed here in Canada the post offices ARE comopletely private), and if they can help pay the bills through advertising, then all the better for everyone. Sounds more like anti-free speechers who want to quelch what they don't like that are against this.

  87. Here's what you could do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime you go into the post office grab a handful of the XP demo Cd's. Then when you get home toss them in the microwave for a few seconds and then file them in the round basket. >:^D

    1. Re: Here's what you could do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you're doing your most to waste energy and raw materials, maybe you could dump a gallon of oil on it and light it on fire!

  88. What I want to know by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Does an XP CD glow after being irradiated? Or does it just melt?

    I'm melting! Melting!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  89. RE: Don't forget... by LowAmmoWarning · · Score: 1

    All the service packs.

    --
    We could all benefit from my education.
  90. Hey, just imagine... by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

    What if, during the period that the US and several states were suing the Tobacco companies, the big 5 had setup free giveaway kiosks inviting people to "Visit Flavor Country"?

    - JoeShmoe

    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  91. Take them all. Be like Bill. by wadetemp · · Score: 1

    How about NOT taking them all and allowing other people the opportunity to make up thier own minds? Or push for a Linux distro company to advertise with free CDs of thier own.

    Fine. Take them all. Be greedy, take as much as you want, everything's for you and only you. Why does this sound familiar? It's Microsoft's (and Slashdot's) mantra! :)

    1. Re:Take them all. Be like Bill. by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      If MS did not want you to take them they would not have put them there.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  92. Re:Ass or titties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about legs?

  93. Mr. Gates, do you have no shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how much is enough for you?

    when will you be happy?

    1. Re:Mr. Gates, do you have no shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought having all your money would make me happy, but now I do actually have it, well, lets just say the old saying "Money does not buy you happiness" is very very true.
      I've tried everything money can buy, from drugs, computers (the next iMac is very nice), electronic toys everything even sex and lots of it, even with stuff you should not have sex with!.
      But the thrill does not last long. Money is no cure to my depression.
      Now all I want it a friend, someone to talk to, hold in my arms and know they love me for me, not just the massive piles of cash in my pocket. It's so miserable here, I've had to write an AI into my house; otherwise they just made legs with lots of Lego Mind Storm sets and run away.

      --BillyBoy

  94. This is perfect. by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

    I don't know why they haven't thought of this before. Make the consumer OS some downloadable, or aol cd-ish giveaway, while the server and workstation OS gets the per-seat gouging. I really think they will do this come to think of it. How can they be called a monopoly while they give away the stuff? Nobody screams about aol's larger (slightly) marketshare, and they give away their product. I honestly don't think they'd see much of a profit loss, especially if they include a 2 week trial of ms office on every install, and then force you to buy the full version, or you get shareware nags when starting windows that say, "If you'd like to do anything even remotely productive, then you need to run right out and buy MS Office for only $399.95. Press "z" in sixty seconds to continue loading windows". And the amazing thing is, people would actually buy into this kind of crap... God bless capitalism...

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
    1. Re:This is perfect. by mlk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People do not complain about AOL free CD's because AOL not a monopoly.
      If I go into (insert any major shop) I can pick up a different free 'get online CD' (In the UK it's normally one of the following three, AOL, Yahoo or BT), then you have all the smaller ISP's, add on to that the commercial ISP's. Choose, you have it with ISP's, can you really say the same about the desktop?

      As to 'free for home use', hell it virtual is, I know no one who paid for Windows, it comes preinstall on computers. As with Office, what you are suggesting is free upgrades... God bless capitalism...

      mlk

      But this really is not news... OMG MS are advertising in post offices!? What next, will they have adverts on TV? How will I escape! :)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:This is perfect. by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ..unless, of course, you play games, develop software for windows, do video editing, have a consumer-grade webcam, scanner, etc., or are learning to use a computer and will have to know the OS for work. In which case, carry on..

      Btw, nowadays Windows surpasses Linux in the desktop scene for three technical reasons:

      1) video drivers with a standardized interface to the kernel. The X/Gtk/KDE thing is outdated; we need a more Windowsish approach where we drop files in, set up a few symlinks and it's using those drivers instead. We should not be forced to recompile our kernel or replace X!

      2) a graphics SDK that's modern (OpenGL 2.0 and it's standardized pixel and vertex shader calls won't be out for another two or three quarters at least, according to the last meeting of the ARB, which means that without a doubt, DirectX will be the new standard for game development. This is fact. Live with it.)

      3) a monolithic kernel.

      Number 3's what's holding us back. I predict that once (if) the GNU hurd catches on, we'll start to see some open source developers moving in this direction. Maybe even the X people'll head that way. But until then.. Linux and BSD may be free, but they ain't the best. Sorry.

    3. Re:This is perfect. by mlk · · Score: 1

      Ironic for someone who has a link to an alternative OS project in his sig, dont you think.

      Well, lets read my sig...

      BeOS is dead
      Ahh, not really "support" BeOS there am I, ohh also, bang goes an alternative!

      Long Live OBOS.
      Err... this has yet to really be born. It's still very 'ttle. For developers eyes only... ;-)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    4. Re:This is perfect. by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      wow, common sense on slashdot... I love linux and all open source, but it just isn't ready for average "Joe Creditcard". Of course, even if there was no X or desktops, if there was a few billion spent on marketing linux, people would flock to it. My only complaint against MS these days is their qustionable business practices, but what companies don't operate questionably? Bill Gates still needs to be shot though...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    5. Re:This is perfect. by Junta · · Score: 2

      As much as your arguments may have sound logical reasoning, it really means nothing to consumers who don't develop. Consumers could care less how much of a pain in the ass it was for developers, they just care what they see. On that front, I think KDE, Gnome, and others offer a lot more power in their interfaces than Windows, and provided a pre-install, would be as easy to use as Windows, except you can't download any old application on the internet and expect it to run. MS seems less concerned about actually improving the product and more about making it different enough for an upgrade, while leveraging their position in the OS market to control other markets (IE, Media-related stuff (WMP, CD burning, simple movie editor)) All this said about developer space issues not making much of a difference, your argument still has a couple of flaws, so I do have some counterpoints:

      1) The way drivers work in XFree isn't horrible, it's the amount of work required on behalf of the user that isn't so hot given the current tools. Automated tools to modify the XF86Config and copy files around can make things easier on the end user. But there is good reason why this can't be done as a simple tab on a nice control panel, Windows lets common users wreak all kinds of hell with the system, while Linux distros don't want things to be world writable... The core architecture is fine, it is user-space tools that keep this from working well. Just look at BeOS, loading device drivers was as simple as dragging it to a certain directory. I would argue a User would be more comfortable using a "wizard" interface, even if it doesn't have to do much, over copying a file, it just doesn't have that "customized" feel to it, if you understand me.

      I have no idea about 2, probably a valid issue, considering the titles available for Windows vs. Linux, DirectX dominates and will continue to, unless MS loses a lot of market share for some inexplicable reason.

      3) Hurd is a piece of crap. That said, Linux has "enough" modularity to provide the benefits that would be seen at the user level. Things like drivers can be loaded as modules with little difficulty. Of course, the problem is that modules are tied to kernel modules, but as nVidia shows, you can make a thin source layer to load a binary-only driver that enables a closed-source driver to run on different kernel revs. Of course , the layer should probably be available in the kernel itself, but kernel developers want open source drivers, something much easier to debug...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    6. Re:This is perfect. by Vairon · · Score: 1

      Junta, I agree with what you're saying, but I feel you're misinformed on the NVIDIA thing. NVIDIA releases completely open source drivers. Both the GLX (OpenGL replacement for X) and the NVdriver (the kernel module) are open source.

    7. Re:This is perfect. by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2

      No they're not; you on crack, boy? The GLX driver's only available as a binary. Only the NVdriver has the source code available for it, and that's a simple pass-thru driver that hands stuff back and forth to the GLX portion. Look for yourself. Open Source my ass..

  95. The USPS *does* represent the government by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 4, Informative
    The Post Office isn't some holy place, it's barely connected with the government

    The post office is the sole official physical presence of the U.S. federal government countrywide.

    Where do you go to "register" for the Selective Service (the draft)? The post office.

    Where do you go to get federal tax forms? The post office is required to supply them.

    Sure, some municipalities may have an FBI or ATF branch office, or even a Secret Service office, but the USPS is the main federal presence in EVERY town. It is the face of the US Government for most.

    1. Re:The USPS *does* represent the government by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 2

      So, are you pointing this out to make the argument that they shouldn't sell advertising space? I can see the merit in that, but it really has nothing to do with Microsoft. Microsoft is just another advertiser in this case, it could have been anyone's display there. It could have been Redhat. Or the company you work for. And still could be.

      So why isn't the story titled just, "Promotions turn up in USPS Offices?" I suspect that that's not really news, first of all, since the USPS is run as a business and can largely do what they want to make up their costs. But when a particular company a large portion of slashdot readers dislike buys that ad space, well, NOW there's something to get pissed off about! By placing Microsoft in the subject, instead of just mentioning who the promotions belong to in passing (if even that) it's implying that Microsoft has done something evil again. There's an interesting debate here about whether it's appropriate for a quasi-governmental business that receives no tax dollars to sell advertising, but it's been derailed by turning this into yet another Microsoft story.

      Any annoyance you may observe in the above is directed more at the story than the post I'm responding to, sorry ChrisCampbell47.

    2. Re:The USPS *does* represent the government by Dr.+Nonsense · · Score: 1

      And don't forget, it's also the place we go to look at the pictures of criminals on the wall...

      Hey, great.... look who we get to see there now!

      So, this ISN'T so inappropriate, after all!

  96. Re:Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sig is asking for trouble fella. I saw Richard Stallman himself on here once so I'd watch out.

  97. So what...who cares by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. Whats the big deal...so MS is advertising...big whoop. I bet if Red Hat put free Linux CD's in a post office as advertising Slashdot users would be declaring themselves as a new state of the union and holding parades. Who gives a damn...this isn't news and it doesn't matter.

  98. Geez, what's the big deal? by WildBeast · · Score: 2

    I go to my bank and their's plenty of free AOL CD's. I don't see anyone complaining about that. At the post office they have a FREE promotional offer for yet another ISP. But hey, now that MS is doing it, it must be wrong, even illegal.

  99. OMG! Head for the hills! by alecto · · Score: 1
    It's all part of a post-Illuminati Gatesian conspiracy to . . . that's right . . . REQUIRE POSTAGE FOR EMAIL!

    The Masons, the Roman Catholic Church, the United States Congress, the Post Office, and Microsoft are RIGHT NOW embedding technology (heard of Windows CE? Embedded!) in MICROSOFT OUTLOOK (and Outlook Express--anyone notice that? Express, as in Express MAIL?) to require that to send email, you must have a PASSPORT (which you get at . . . you guessed it . . . the Post Office) and give your CREDIT CARD NUMBER to pay EMAIL POSTAGE !!! .

    The proof is incontrovertible. ACT NOW! TAKE TO THE STREETS!

    Or, it could be just that the USPS made a few bucks displaying MS coasters to help keep the price of stamps from going up so much. Naw.

  100. Oh oh this would not work by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer special edition collectable stamps

    And if they did issue such a stamp some people would have a problem getting them to stick as they would spit on the wrong side.

    1. Re:Oh oh this would not work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer special edition collectable stamps
      And if they did issue such a stamp some people would have a problem getting them to stick as they would spit on the wrong side.
      And no one would admit that they would actually lick the right side of the stamp...
  101. Separation of church and state in First Amendment by yerricde · · Score: 2

    [separation of church and state is]

    From the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  102. The USPS are Federal Employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's "so what".

  103. Shipping a package? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    eventually post mail will become a spam-filled memory.

    How are you supposed to ship a package without going through USPS or a courier?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Shipping a package? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      I don't consider that post mail, I consider that 'shipping'.

    2. Re:Shipping a package? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Small businesses use postal mail extensively to mail bills to customers (bill from your plumber, etc.) and to mail cheques to their suppliers.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  104. Demo? by crivens · · Score: 1

    But what is the demo? What's on it? What does it do? There's no point bitching about MS giving a free demo away. I can't believe anyone would bitch. Whey shouldn't they? I mean, AOL gives away enough CDs to fill the moon! I don't get why people are complaining about this.

  105. The reverse would also be true by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2

    Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

    That would also prevent governments from breaking up monolopies, wouldn't it?

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    1. Re:The reverse would also be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No that would make separation of cororations a common practice.

  106. Only... by Tom7 · · Score: 1


    This might be funny if XP or Anthrax were a virus, but neither is. Anthrax is a bacteria, and XP is actually a pretty good operating system. (I wouldn't run it as a server, but it sure is nice on the desktop..)

    1. Re:Only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't run it as a server either. Of course, it is a CLIENT/DESKTOP operating system, not a server operating system, so that kind of makes sense doesn't it?

      Now Windows .NET Server, that you might run as an operating system once it is released.....

  107. Slogan... by Nick+Smith · · Score: 1

    At least there's a ready-made slogan for the joint venture with US post:

    "You've got mail."

    Oh. Wait...

  108. I rent a room at the Post Office by rfg · · Score: 1

    My main offices are located in the main lobby
    of the Post Office. My rent is paid to GSA,
    the building owners, a federal agency. All GSA
    buildings are diversified and can rent excess
    space. Not too long ago, FEDEX negotiated to
    have package pickup stations in the Post Offices.

    I like my office; good location, lots of traffic,
    and the rental is comparable to other buildings
    in this town.

  109. Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hey, what's the big deal? Remember, Microsoft won. The Government offered "unconditional surrender."

    Next up, Dubya is moving into the shed. The White House will become the new Microsoft Monument--once the bugs are ?!?(*)?@@?$%#?... ;-)

  110. Re:Tax money used to give Microsoft advertizing sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but virtually all their assets were
    aquired during a time when they DID get
    tax funding. Another point is that the
    post office enjoys a statutory monopoly on
    mail delivery - nobody can compete with them
    for regular mail delivery service.

  111. Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Doh. I thought I was on Slashdot, not the Register. What is this? Some random person on some random web site says he saw an ad in a random post office? This isn't news.

  112. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  113. Not just the postoffice by kwj8fty1 · · Score: 1

    For the past 2 months, the local (seattle) USPS trucks all have HUGE MSN billboards on them.

    First time I saw them I was quite upset. I almost socked my mailman.

  114. That's not what their financials say. by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    A quick look at http://www.usps.com/financials/ shows repeated influxes of Federal funds to keep them afloat.

    I would also expect to find that, like with other "low cost" agencies, the costs of buildings, sallaries, retirements, and the like, simply do not exist since the buildings, people, or other such things are paid for on other balance sheets.

    Do be aware, Mr. Coward, that it is still illegal to use any other service than the USPS for "first class mail" as defined by law. People/Companies have been prosecuted and fined for such "over-use" of services like FedEx and UPS.

    Were the USPS sold for scrap, it wouldn't bother me at all if the resultant company chose to allow advertizing. It is only when the government monopoly on force is used to promote private, for-profit enterprises that I object.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    1. Re:That's not what their financials say. by uspsguy · · Score: 1

      Gee, I looked at the link and discovered that the government is expected to pay for using the services of the Post Office. If you really looked at the sheets, you would dicover little details like salaries are the largest single expense, capitol construction is there, retirement costs are in there, too. I wish we got a ton of tax money, it would make things a whole lot more plesant. Also, FYI, it is Congress that makes the laws about how we operate. They decided that a flat rate, universal first class mail service was in the best interests of the whole country. I'd have no problem giving up the first class monopoly but the competetors would need to play by the same rules - deliver to every mailbox in the whole country six days a week, no skimming on just the high volume routes. Any takers on that basis?

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  115. In a way, yes - by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    If they are a private company, why are they subject to so much regulation? Any innovation, change of business practice, rate increase, etc.
    The USPS is a GSE - Government Sponsored Entity - like Freddie MAC, Fannie Mae, etc.
    Yet still, legally, they are owned by the members of the USPS Union. (I don't think that just anyone else can buy stock in them...)
    As for them being able to do what they like - I truly doubt it. Did you ever notice that it costs exactly the same price to send a letter across the street as it does to send a letter to someone in a remote rural location? If they could 'do what they want', I'm sure they would start charging more for the inconvenient deliveries...
    They are not open to free-market competition, either - the have been granted a monopoly on first class mail. That's why FedEx can't suddenly start offering first-class mail - the USPS has been granted a monopoly on that. With that monopoly comes a huge amount of government regulation -
    In fact, the National Association of Letter Carriers has regulations that specifically prohibit advertising in Post Office Lobbies - Take a look at section 338.413 of the following: http://www.nalc.org/depart/cau/pdf/manuals/asm/asm c3.pdf

    I'm only writing this because there's a lot of confusion on the subject - If your post was a troll, it was pathetic. Put a little more effort into it next time.

    Cheers,
    Jim in tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  116. How does the math work? by pagercam2 · · Score: 1

    USPS = unreliable
    MS Windows = unreliable

    Does unreliablity sum or go up as a geometric series???

    USPS + M$ = unreliable x2
    or
    USPS * MS = unreliable ^2 ???

  117. What About AOL CDs!? by MSwanson · · Score: 1

    Is this somehow different or worse than the AOL CDs I have to scrub out of my ass because I trudge through them everywhere I go!?

    1. Re:What About AOL CDs!? by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      AOL is not a monopoly abusing it's marketshare power to destroy competitors. It's a simple-in-concept online community that got so rich it bought everything it liked. But at least it doesn't dictate terms to Dell about online services included on the desktop.

      And, well, we just don't like Microsoft, I guess. They're nasty wankers, mate.

  118. AOL 7.0! by stomv · · Score: 1

    So take 'em all, and replace them with the AOL 7.0 CDs. While you may not like AOL-TW better, you certainly don't like 'em worse.

  119. Good start - one change by Chazmati · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's pretty good! I'd take out the 'hard-coded' reference to an arbitrary US Dollar amount, though. $100 million might sound about right for a really punishing fine today, but maybe $100 sounded reasonable for a fine back in the 19th century. These documents have staying power.

  120. That's not what it says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a restriction on what can be placed on public bulletin boards - I'm going to assume they mean by members of the public. What they choose to advertise NOT by using the public bulletin boards is another matter. At least that's the letter of the document - the original intent may have been something different.

  121. What's next? by quan74 · · Score: 1

    So what's next? Will we soon be seeing US soldiers wearing the XP logo on the back of their athletic uniforms instead of "ARMY" ? After all, it's just add space, hey the military could use the extra money they make in ad sales to develop newer more powerful weapons that hunt down hackersH^H^H^H^H^H^H terrorists. Another question I'd like to see answered is: Has anyone seen any ads at their post office for anything BESIDES MS? I mean, this is borderline humorous, except for the fact that my tax dollars are going to subsidize microsoft advertisments I'd be laughing my ass off right now. And why is it the Postal Service wants to raise stamp prices again when A.) They're already turning a profit and B.) They can sell ad space to MS?< /VENT >

    1. Re:What's next? by WildBeast · · Score: 2

      Dude, $730 billion are spent each year on military stuff around the world. How the hell could they need even more money?

    2. Re:What's next? by quan74 · · Score: 1

      So I (a goverment contractor) can make even more money of course! Seriously, I wasn't suggesting that the military begin selling advertisments for commercial companies, but was likening it to what it appears the postal service is doing with ads in the post office and on their vehicles. If my tax dollars and postage are paying for those buildings, vehicles, fuel, etc. I don't think it's right that I'm paying for a commercial corporations ad space. Next we'll be seeing commercials for WIN XP between takes of the Microsoft Hearings on CSPAN........

  122. something usefull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about using them for solar reflectors to generate heat/electricity.. yeah that is the ticket

  123. "Postal Ad Network" by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    The U.S. Postal Service now sells advertising space. They call it the "Postal Ad Network". The USPS writes:
    • Success Sells.

      For over 200 years, the United States Postal Service is the brand that has been built on trust and service.

      Now we're selling our unique space. Think of us as your Multi-channel Communications Service. Marketers can get the visibility and reach through the Postal Ad Network.

      Place your big message on our trucks, collection boxes and even in our postal facilities. Or small space ads on our stamp packages and banner ads on our website.

    So it may get worse; there may be Microsoft ads on USPS trucks next.

    There's opposition to the USPS selling out like this.

    1. Re:"Postal Ad Network" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For over 200 years, the United States Postal Service is the brand that has been built on trust and service.

      Now we're cashing in all the trust we have accumulated in order to make a quick buck.

  124. seems a bit ironic by LesF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Free promotions, how strange... and kinda desparate sounding...

    Down here in NZ I received a postcard 'invitation' to the visual studio .net product release, which I can be privileged to attend at the cost of $149 (plus 12.5% GST).

    Now I may have a distorted view of the universe, from working on a Microsoft development platform for too long, but shouldn't MS be offering incentives for developers to take up their new dev tools ? Maybe a free copy of VS.NET here & there ? So we can develop applications that require our clients to purchase MS licenses ?

    No, they can give away massive $$$ to promote the OS of the future, but developers should PAY THEM to sit in a big room and hear about new products that we could buy off them. Altho I was not rushing to take up .NET to start with, this slipped the gear lever into reverse for me.

    oh, and my home desktop is KDE, so even a free copy of XP ain't getting near my hardware :)

    LesF

  125. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  126. Windows XP postage stamps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "hi, i'd like a book of stamps"
    "that will be $1k dollars"
    "what !!, all i wanted were stamps"

    1. Re:Windows XP postage stamps by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      That's hilarious, you should be on TV.

  127. What are you smoking? by Erris · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The post office is not really part of the government but rather a business run to support an important country function.

    What part of "United States Post Office" don't you understand? That the civil servants are employed by the Federal Government?

    There are many makers of software in this great country and I'm sure none of them apprecite their tax dollars being used to support Microsoft. Don't you remember half of them testifying against M$ over the last few years? Well, gee there it is being promoted in a maner that some people will take as offial US sponsorship. It stinks. Were any of them offered the same oppertunity? Would it even be possible to fit all the material there? 30 Linux distros, 45 BSDs, AOL, Sun, HP, Compaq. There would not be room to stand.

    Let's look at another thing "powering" the US post office by way of compairison. Jeeps. You see them all over, as they won bids on an open market. The Post Office Jeeps were stripped of all insignia and were only recognizable by their form. No cardboard cut outs recomending the purchase of Jeeps ever kept the sun from shining through a USPO window. No "test drives" were ever offered. Instead, Jeep was happy to be making the sale and the use was recomendation enough. The USPO had no intentions of recomending one automobile maker over another.

    Go to Netcraft, you will see that most US government sites do NOT run M$ trash.

    So my wife asks me, "why would they bother to promote M$, a company that needs no promotion." Might the settlement be nationalization? Oh shit.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:What are you smoking? by XorNand · · Score: 3, Informative


      Technically, the USPS is a corporation wholly owned by the US government, but not actually part of it.
      It's been this way since July 1, 1971 since the passage of the Postal Reorganization Act. Prior to then, the Postmaster General was a Presidential Cabinet level position (might come in handy if you ever make it onto the Millionaire show.)

      Some other changes:
      - Operational authority vested in a Board of Governors and Postal Service executive management, rather than in Congress.

      -Authority to issue public bonds to finance postal buildings and mechanization.

      -Direct collective bargaining between representatives of management and the unions.

      -A new rate-setting procedure, built around an independent Postal Rate Commission.

      (If you're really interested, check out a bit of history on the USPS.)

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    2. Re:What are you smoking? by mlong · · Score: 2, Informative
      What part of "United States Post Office" don't you understand? That the civil servants are employed by the Federal Government?

      I believe the poster meant to say that while it is part of the government, and its employees are federal employees, the post office is an independent corporation. The government cut it loose in 1970. While it may be part of the government, no tax payer money goes to the USPS and the USPS runs itself as it sees fit. And this is why they can do whatever they want with Microsoft. For more info you might see history of usps.

      --
      //m
    3. Re:What are you smoking? by phat_rat · · Score: 0

      Exactly,and why would there be things like UPS and FedEX if they weren't trying to compete with the most commonly used,government funded,USPS?

      --
      "Fight The Power"
    4. Re:What are you smoking? by John+Murdoch · · Score: 2
      Let's look at another thing "powering" the US post office by way of compairison. Jeeps. You see them all over, as they won bids on an open market. The Post Office Jeeps were stripped of all insignia and were only recognizable by their form. No cardboard cut outs recomending the purchase of Jeeps ever kept the sun from shining through a USPO window. No "test drives" were ever offered. Instead, Jeep was happy to be making the sale and the use was recomendation enough. The USPO had no intentions of recomending one automobile maker over another.

      Except, well, that the USPS doesn't buy them from Jeep. (Jeep, BTW, isn't a company. Jeep is a brand of DaimlerChrysler.) The USPS buys vehicles from a variety of vendors, under contract. Here, for instance, is an article (with photo) about the USPS buying electric-powered mail vehicles from Ford.

      If you browse the New Business Ideas page of the USPS web site, you'll find that the Post Office is looking for new ways to generate revenue. That's why there are Federal Express drop boxes outside post offices these days--and why Federal Express is hauling Express Mail for the USPS. If they can get Microsoft to pay them money to distribute advertising in the post office, how is that different from AOL paying them to carpet-bomb America with sign-up CDs? The more ways the USPS finds to produce revenue, the lower postage costs will be. Is that a bad thing?

    5. Re:What are you smoking? by Gkeeper80 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This entire story is ubserdly inflamatory! There's a lot of MS bashing on this site but this really is a new low. The government has stated that MS has monopolistic practicices, but untill it decieds that they should not be allowed to be a company they have every right to continue promoting their products. The governemt isn's promoting Windows, they are selling add space! As we all know USPS hasn't been doing all that well financially. Email, and now the anthrax scares are causeing them to loss revenue. Selling add space is just one of the ways they do it. Lets face it, AOL/TimeWarner had there finger in that pot too. You think the government is supporting the loony tunes? You can go into any post office and buy pads of paper and other supplies with Looney Tunes charecters and logos. USPS is a buisness, part of the government or not. They are regulated by Congress, but their income does not come from taxes. Unless you all are so anti marketing that you can't accept a small eye sore I suggest you stop complaining and realize that MS has every right to continue advertising and the Post Office needs ad revenue to continue serving you.

    6. Re:What are you smoking? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >their tax dollars

      You mean the USPS is not entirely funded by postage?

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    7. Re:What are you smoking? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      And hasn't the mail service really improved since then!

      I think that 1 out of 100 pieces of mail ends up at another house in the neighborhood, though since some of them never turn up, I'm not sure.

      USPO, the best advertisement for FedEx and UPS!
      .

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    8. Re:What are you smoking? by Erris · · Score: 2
      >their tax dollars

      You mean the USPS is not entirely funded by postage?

      I buy stamps with my whiskey too. It's another form of tax.

      So many tecnicalities, so few people who can see the forest through the trees. A federally mandated and protected exclusive franchise is a part of the government, regardless of what it's called. We pay for it, it serves us and it should not be used to promote some of us over others. The social costs of government franchise abuse like that can easily be seen in the ruins of the Soviet Union. There are a limited number of natural monopolies where it's in the best interest of the public to co-operate and mandate standards, software, publishing, or hairdressing for that matter are not it. The Post Office is not a tool of it's current director, it's OUR TOOL and this stuff violates the spirit of the law if not the letter.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    9. Re:What are you smoking? by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      Somewhat off-topic: My mom's husband worked for UPS for many years, and he still follows their business (he should, he has plenty of stock). I remember him being particularly miffed when the USPS inked a deal with FedEx to be their "preferred overnight delivery provider" -- in other words, you could go in to a post office and request an overnight package, and you would get it send by FedEx. Talk about favoring one corporation over another! I don't think UPS was ever given the opportunity to bid, though I could be wrong.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  128. Re:When did Hell start co-locating at the post off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The somewhat correct spelling is YWHW. Alas, my computer doesn't do Hebrew, so I can't get the true coorect spelling in here.

  129. Re:When did Hell start co-locating at the post off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    er... YHWH, even...

  130. GG /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The USPS got privatized a long time ago. To imply that where it gets its advertising dollars has ANY connection with the MS case is so ludicrous that as an author I'd be embarassed to put my name on any article even suggesting it. Another pointless MS bashing treated like a newsworthy story. Why can't all this effort be applied towards something constructive?

  131. Contact them at... by RageMachine · · Score: 1

    http://new.usps.com/cgi-bin/uspsbv/scripts/content .jsp?B=contactform&C=Community%20Services&BB=-8216 &TT=2&CC=-8216&DD=null&Comments=null

    I told them what I think, and ask if they could
    improve a few things, and told them what I did like about them.

    Don't post childishly, or they will not take it into concern.

    --

    --------------------------
    Is this a sig?
    --------------------------
  132. booty kissing govt by fcombine · · Score: 1

    To me the whole thing comes off as the U.S. rolling its belly up for a scratch from a company they've currently, to whatever small degree, convicted of performing illegal business practices. And now they're doing buisiness with them. That certainly seems a reasonable case for a conflict of interest, to my mind.

    I guess it would be fine if it didn't seem so grossly evil(legal though I guess it may be). It doesn't really give me much hope that the government is faithfully dealing with Microsoft on our behalf.

    fc

  133. Just goes to show.... by ZoneGray · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just goes to show what ruthless monopolists they are.

    Microsoft isn't so nice, either.

  134. free windows xp for university students by gatorboi · · Score: 1

    microsoft seems to be giving out free copies of windows xp to students of select universities.

  135. My thoughts.. by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    1: The USPS isn't exactly the most profitable (simi) part of the government. Its become more and more seperated in the last few decades. By the time your average slashdot reader reaches his 25th birthday, it may not exist anymore, unless its reabsorbed into the government in entirety. Advertising is good thing in this case, i would assume. I don't think it would be long before we start seeing "banner ads" imprinted on envelopes. I'll refrain from commenting on my opinions of the apropriateness of the release of XP for this bit of slashdot satire.

    2: I forsee soon a slashdot story..
    "Bill Gates trying to kill journalists!"

    A noticably weakened Bill Gates today sneezed at a 4 PM press conference announcing his philantrhopic extension to the public library system. Gates later was diagnosted with a potentially fatal and communicable illness "Influenza".

    While covering the conference in his boxers, in his living room, Rob Malda noted that a member of the press who, at one time made a snide remark about Windows 3.1 being "Broken", was standing directly in front of and below Gates.

    "I can only assume this was a pre-planned attack against the media. Gates will not stand for negative press, and, being the dark god Azmodeus himself, his vengence knows no limit of time".

    When asked if this could be attributed to circumstance, or wild speculation on his part, he denied the accusation and began screaming "bitchslap dot pee ell! BITCHSLAP DOT PEE ELL!".

    Hemos and Timothy could not be reached for comment.

    Members of the mainstream media were not at a loss for words with this issue, mentioning:

    "The things a mind can come up with, when deprived of intelligent human contact" -- Hugh Downs

    "And you *LISTENED* to him?! He doesn't even have a mastery of the english language" -- Wolf Blitzer

    "Jesus Christ.." -- Jesus Christ

    "Taco is correct.. [What follows was a long-winded, dicursive diatribe blaming Bill Gates for Columbine. Omitted for the sake of brevity.]" -- Jon Katz

    "I posted this story three minutes before he did" -- chrisd

  136. I'm thinking more constructive... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Use the discs as runners in a Tesla Turbine.

    They'd make pretty nifty ones for a small fluid pump... :-)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  137. Try this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got an AOL 7.0 CD with a USPS change-of-address confirmation letter a few days ago. pfff..

  138. No Subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sammag.com/docs/355.html

  139. My two cents by vex24 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it's just because I'm drunk, but I think the USPS are a bunch of filthy whores already anway... The damn change-of-address cards come with 25 advertisements, and the first thing they do with your new address is send it out to all the local spammers anyway... The USPS will do anything to keep from laying off excess employees, which is a bit noble if you think of it that way... Now stay away from my wife! No, I'm just kidding, you're my best friend... really, I mean that... just kidding about that... G'night people!

    --

    People shape laws. Not the other way around.

  140. Nice spin by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Funny
    Microsoft Windows XP: It's Not Just A Good Idea, It's The Government

    :D

    1. Re:Nice spin by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Microsoft Windows XP: It's Not Just A Good Idea, It's The Government

      The US Government: It's Not Just A Good Idea, It's a Microsoft subsidiary.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Nice spin by gjbivin · · Score: 1

      MSUSA!

  141. USPS, the Microsoft of the US Government by detritus. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After working in the shipping business, I learned quickly how the USPS is the government equivalent of Microsoft. Try sending an overnight letter via UPS or Federal Express to a PO Box. It can't be done. Why? Simple: The USPS forces senders to use their mail services.
    When you are a business with no competition, you have no reason to improve. IMO, anybody would be crazy to send something of crucial value or importance via any postal service and expect the same service as a private equivalent (UPS/FedEx/Airbourne).
    They are a corporate monopoly with government protection. Not to mention, the only government agency I have seen that runs TV ads ("Fly Like An Eagle" crap).

  142. USPS not only place infected! by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    I found a copy of this "preview" in a popular science mag!

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  143. Please allow me to bitch about slahsdot for a bit. by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just a general rant.

    Look at my "submit story" history we see the following:

    2001-11-21 06:59:10 Javascript cookie vulerablity in Opera (articles,security) (rejected)
    2001-11-25 22:09:39 Human embryo cloned (articles,news) (rejected)
    2001-12-05 06:14:01 Earth based telescopes now have potential to match (articles,news) (rejected)

    And this, this makes it to the front page of Slashdot? WTF!? No, it needs to be expanded:
    What
    The
    Fuck!?
    I mean seriously? This has what to do with what exactly? MS in the post office? God forbid that there should be some commercialism in the US Junkmail distribution system. I mean my god, what's next, the post office advertising on TV? Or maybe they'll raise prices on stamps or something.

    I mean really. Slashdot is so inconsistent it, it... Well, I guess we all expect it now, but, god

    Ok, now go ahead and mod me down.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  144. Free? by FozzTexx · · Score: 1

    So does this mean I can go to the USPS to get a CD that will let me run XP free for 1000 hours for 45 days? No credit card required?

  145. no, sorry, not a crippled full version by Barbarian · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure that the "Demo" is this: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/evaluation/ tours/demos/default.asp on a CD, i.e. a bunch of AVI files probably with an auto-execing viewer.

  146. Mail Trucks. by s4m7 · · Score: 1

    I happened to notice that the mail truck in the parking lot at work the other day had a microsoft billboard. I didn't think much about it at the time, but i never have seen an ad on a mailtruck before.

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  147. Conseptions of MS Windows by joonasl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess the reason people are generally not outraged by this kind of marketing is that Microsoft Windows is not in a way considered to be a "product" in the traditional sense of the word by general public. If you would ask 100 Joe Random Users to draw a computer, 95 of them would draw a Windows desktop. In peoples minds,MS Windows has become THE operating system instead of A operating system and a integrated essential part of any computer.

    --
    "There is a terrorist behind every bush"
  148. This is still a valid Public Policy decision by i1984 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The advertisement of Microsoft software in the United States Post Office should be subject to public policy review, irrespective of the Postals Service's technical corporate status.

    Microsoft is a convicted monopolist that has shown no remorse for its actions, and scarcely acknowledges that it has done any wrong. Ideally, the government would not be helping to pormote this malignancy.

    It has been repeated many times throughout this discussion, first that the Post Office is part of the US government, only to have that assertion contradicted to the effect that the Postal Service is actually an independant corporation established and run by the government -- posters have also pointed out that the Federal Government is the sole shareholder, appoints the directors, and as needed bails the service out to the tune of a billion dollars.

    All this is missing the point: the government shouldn't be helping spread the monopoly even if the post office is technically independent. The service still answers to Congress, and does arguably more so than most other businesses. This sort of issue is well within the domain of public policy -- even if no policies currently exist that are relevant to this situation.

    In a broader sense, corporations in general also answer to Congress (even in cases like Enron where they'd rather not!), and by extension we regulate all of them in numerous ways as well. In comparison to wholly indepenent and totally private corporations it should be easy to shape a public policy in regards to a pseudo-governmental organization like the post office -- even if it means appointing a board of directors who agree that convicted monopolists shouldn't have the privilege of advertising in Postal Service buildings.

    This is also why this is a relevant Slashdot story. It involves what amounts to a public policy decision (or lack thereof) that affects technology that the Slashdot community cares about: Microsoft, monopolies, the blurred line between the public and private sector, and public policy regarding these topics.

  149. Re:When did Hell start co-locating at the post off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We offer literature about God. Make your own deal with the devil. :-)

  150. Consequences of free OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't this destroy pretty much all future litigation against MS? I mean, giving away something for free would technically take MS out of the OS sales market, and would effectively remove them from competition.

    Suck!

    1. Re:Consequences of free OS by I+The+Man+in+Black+I · · Score: 1

      It is a demo... If a shampoo brand gives away free samples, it does not take them out of the sales market.

      Tomas Beaujean (a.k.a. The Man in Black)

      --

      <sig>what-mib-says | mib2english</sig>
    2. Re:Consequences of free OS by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      Secondly, I don't think the demo is a copy of the system (like AOL), but more of a flash/video commercial.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  151. Mail Fraud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because this has something to do with the post office could this be mail fraud when:
    Claim - Windows XP is faster
    Claim - Windows XP is secure
    Claim - Windows XP is stable
    Claim - Windows XP makes you more productive

    All turn out to be false?

  152. If anyone can have space in a post office by buckrogers · · Score: 1

    for a fixed fee, then I don't have a problem with this.

    If only microsoft can do this, or if it costs microsoft less than other companies, then I have a problem with it.

    I think I am going to go to the local postoffice and pick up a couple of handfulls of coasters... Errr, I mean demos.

    --
    -- Never make a general statement.
  153. USPS major Public Relations Lift by GdoL · · Score: 2, Funny

    USPS had a great idea. People are always complaing about their services. So now when they enter in on of those postoffices they will have someone else to blame.

    .-))

    --

    ------I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.------
  154. I repeat, so what? by edibleplastic · · Score: 2
    Just because they're connected with the government and has special privileges doesn't mean that they're not allowed to deal with private corporations. The fact that the USPS is currently in a seven year partnership with Federal Express (a corporation) apparently doesn't seem to matter to you.


    Whether or not it's wise for them to do this with MS is another issue, but it is most certainly within their jurisdiction to do so.

    1. Re:I repeat, so what? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Just because they're connected with the government and has special privileges doesn't mean that they're not allowed to deal with private corporations. The fact that the USPS is currently in a seven year partnership with Federal Express (a corporation) apparently doesn't seem to matter to you.

      How would you feel if the USPS were to team up with the Mafia? Which are a better analogy with Microsoft than Federal Express.

  155. Federal Price Fixing by shani · · Score: 1

    According to this article no private entity can deliver a package or envalope for less than $3 or twice the cost of a first class letter.

  156. Where are the Linux and BSD Distros? by phat_rat · · Score: 0

    I'm just wondering where the government funded Linux & BSD distros are in the post offices?I'd like to pick one up..oh wait..no linux company has the money to pay off the postal service like that..damn I'll just have to stick to the good ol' Mandrake/Redhat/Dragon ftp sites..*sigh*

    LOL

    This is just another example of MS paying off the most powerful government in the world.Is it really that hard to comprehend that MS/Disney control most of the herd's mind and steal the small amount of cash that they allowed them to have in the first place?

    I think not.

    http://paulmadore.tripod.com
    http://freesimstuff.topcities.com

    --
    "Fight The Power"
  157. innocent until proven guilty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To truly get that, you need to buy the judge first.

  158. Speaking of microsoft ads by Blackjax · · Score: 1


    Did any other New Yorkers notice that Microsoft paid to have the giant picture of Tux & IBM near Port Authority painted over with an ad for XP? I found it kind of amusing myself.

  159. What if RedHat did this? by edibleplastic · · Score: 2

    Would anybody be calling the USPS biased or giving in to corporations if suddenly they started handing out free RedHat cds and avertising their service plan? I don't think so. That would just be considered "advertising" not "creating a dangerous link between corporation and state" as many people have written. *sigh*

  160. Great Bedfellows!! by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seeing as Microsoft and USPS are two monopolies that excel in crappy service, why would anyone be surprised to see them picking each other's noses?

  161. Windows for Pens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Windows for Pens! (Yes, there was such a thing).

  162. RE: Antitrust by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    ...profoundly disturbing about such shenanigans going on even as District Court Judge
    Colleen Kollar-Kotelly allegedly mulls the proper punishment of the
    Microsoft Corporation, an illegal monopoly, for violating U.S. antitrust law?


    Mod me down for off-topic, but I'm wondering why this story has 3x as many posts as the "last-call for public comments" in the M$ antitrust case story?

    If you've got something to say, and the time to post it here, then say it to the DoJ. They are the ones who can do something to change that behavior you're dissatisfied (satisfied?) with.

    http://www.codeweavers.com/~jwhite/tunney.html

  163. Simple: PO needs $, Msft has $. EOT by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    subj says it all.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  164. Re:When did Hell start co-locating at the post off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be G*d. Now, who is going to burn in hell?

  165. No Problem! by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    Apparently Microsoft has promotional displays with free WindowsXP promotional software in U.S. Post Offices.

    Wait, don't tell me - these promotional displays for Windows XP are hanging right next those posters the USPS has warning about

    Suspicious Mail Alert

    [Warning: gratuitous MS bashing ahead. Mature audiences only.]

    Given all the latest scares about anthrax spores being distributed via US Mail, I'd say that Windows XP would constitute a similarly receptive medium for distributing viral agents and that such posters are not at all out of place.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  166. Appropriate by HiThere · · Score: 2

    What could be more appropriate than MS's picture next to the others on the Post Office wall. Too bad it doesn't say "Dead or Alive".

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  167. Taxes? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    But this is about taxes. The MS tax.
    .

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  168. This is NEWS??? by jxqvg · · Score: 2, Funny
    Do any of you ever go to a postoffice? These ads have been up since before XP's release!
    Slashdot: Old News For Nerds. Stuff That Mattered Last Year
  169. "separation of corporation and state" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now that would be really stupid.

    Why? Everything would have to be done in-house. No more hiring construction companies to build highways; no more buying railcars from the leading manufacturers; no more buying phone service from the leading carrier; the list goes on and on.

  170. YAAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The post office makes money. Part of the deal is that they can run it like a business. Get a freakin' clue.

  171. Birds of a Feather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One broken system advertises for another. The two companies seem to offer the same level of service and use similar tactics.

  172. Re:Separation of church and state in First Amendme by cornflux · · Score: 2

    i am talking about the specific phrase "separation of church and state"

    thank you.

  173. "No establishment of religion" == separation by yerricde · · Score: 1

    i am talking about the specific phrase "separation of church and state"

    By that argument, you can claim that the First Amendment doesn't protect free speech, only "freedom of speech." I read "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" as requiring at least some separation between church and state.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:"No establishment of religion" == separation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...zzz...

  174. Re:Take them all create M$ marketing hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you see the marketing hype now if all the OS demos are snatched up ... XP millions of CDs swept up, buy yours today, most popular OS by CD, etc. etc. etc.

  175. A demo of MS S/W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goes tits up a lot and only runs for a short time before giving nag notices, then it quits entirely.

  176. Free OS/2 cd's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it's not like anyone was paying for them...

  177. Just wait.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until you start finding the Microsoft Bible in your hotel room....

  178. The Initiation Of Force by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    You state, "I'd have no problem giving up the first class monopoly but the competetors would need to play by the same rules - deliver to every mailbox in the whole country six days a week, no skimming on just the high volume routes. Any takers on that basis?"

    If there is a market for such a level of service, there will be entepreneurs who step up to provide that service.

    Your criteria is something that you believe in. Are you emotionally prepared to give up the ability to enforce what you want on others by the power of the sword?

    The risk is that the service provided will not be to your satisfaction. So what? AOL doesn't deliver service to my satisfaction, that doesn't mean I'm going to advocate a law banning AOL.

    ....no matter how much fun that would be.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics