Slashdot Mirror


Hitchhikers Guide To Be Made Into A Movie

tonywestonuk writes "The Beeb are reporting that The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy series will be made into a Hollywood Movie. Apparently they are getting some other script writer to finish off Douglas Adams' final installment (I pessimistically wonder how awful this will make it.). It seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously...."

429 comments

  1. Or until his death.. by fredistheking · · Score: 0

    Until they could get the rights.

    1. Re:Or until his death.. by slickwillie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they were just waiting for him to finish the trilogy.

    2. Re:Or until his death.. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      haha, I wish I could mod you +1 funny.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Or until his death.. by mixonic · · Score: 0

      Actually, the installment spoken of above was written by Adams himself. check the article for details, but i beleive the last studio with rights for a movie was disney, and he was working on said movie script with them.

      Adams had already signed away the rights, fully willing to see a movie (other than that trash english stuff :) ).

      -mixonic

  2. So long, and thanks for all the laughs... by renehollan · · Score: 0

    ...what, you thought I was going to say fish?

    --
    You could've hired me.
  3. Great! by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 1

    I loved Adams' books when I was growing up. They were very funny!

    --
    I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    1. Re:Great! by love2hateMS · · Score: 1

      Heck, I still love them. I read them once a year just for kicks.

    2. Re:Great! by Sivar · · Score: 2

      They were more than funny. If you look beneath the surface they were full of insights into human behavior and philosophy about our race's place in the universe. Some have theorized that the incredible wit was a cover to expose the masses to some form of real philosophy.
      I doubt that theory, but the books were undeniably witty and brilliant at the same time, not unlike the author.
      On a tangent, a friend's girfriend met Adams when she worked as a receptionist in a hotel.
      "Are you the Douglas Adams?"
      "Which Douglas Adams?"
      The answer was very clear. :)

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  4. Wasn't he... by idontneedanickname · · Score: 1

    already working on this [right] before his death? (Douglas Adams)

    1. Re:Wasn't he... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Article mentions that he'd tried to get it made into a movie, but that he'd essentially given up on Hollywood ever doing it.

    2. Re:Wasn't he... by yoz · · Score: 2

      Yes. In the two years leading up to his death he wrote a couple of new drafts, and already had a production company and Jay Roach on board.

      -- Yoz

    3. Re:Wasn't he... by trezor · · Score: 1

      As I thought we all knew, you can read some of his 'Hollywood-letters' in the book released after his death, 'The salmon of doubt - Hitchhiking the galaxy one last time'.

      Quite amusing I must admit, and definetly worth reading.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  5. My two word uninformed review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mostly humorless.

  6. Greg's Previews has had info on this for two years by merlyn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Always check Greg's Previews for useful information on upcoming movies. In fact, he used to be upcomingmovies.com, one of my most visited sites.

  7. Is it really? by doc_traig · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously....

    Let's wait until we see the finished product before saying that. We just may be thankful Mr. Adams didn't have to suffer another Hollywood-ization.

    - DDT

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
    1. Re:Is it really? by JoeLinux · · Score: 2

      another? did he have an earlier Hollywood-ization?

      JoeLinux

    2. Re:Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no hollywood movie i know of. there was a BBC movie that was absolutely dreadful. fans of the books will still enjoy it, of course, but it really was bad. incidentally, if you have seen the bbc movie, you may also recognize that the horrible effects were similar to dr. who, as adams sometimes worked on the effects on dr. who (which is another series only true fans could love, as the effects in that were only marginally better than the Guide's effects). of course, me saying how dreadful both are might lead one to think that i did not like them; fact is, i grew up on such oddities, and cherish the memories of staying up late on sunday night to watch dr. who on pbs when i was little (often resulting in my falling asleep on the floor in front of the tv in the living room, but not always), or watching bearded arthur pulling scrabble tiles out of the bag amidst the native earthmen. - my parents were/are sci-fi nuts, worse than me!
      --paul

    3. Re:Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paul, that write-up was just dreadful. Dreadful i tell you.

    4. Re:Is it really? by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      By movie I presume you mean the TV series?

    5. Re:Is it really? by dirvish · · Score: 2

      The old movie is the episodes from the BBC series. The special effects are really bad, but I imagine they were fairly cutting edge for the early eighties when it was made. You can get the entire series on DVD (2 disks) including extras with editorial by Douglas

    6. Re:Is it really? by chrisos · · Score: 1

      No the effects where not even slightly cutting edge at the time. I believe the reason for this was "Budgetary constraints".

      This was the way the BBC did things back then, let the quality of the plot/dialog/etc come though rather than throwing megabucks at the effects team.

      Think "Dr. Who" and you have an idea of the technical levels involved :)

      Its sad really that Hollywood seems to think a good plot gets in the way of a good film these days :(

      --
      If nature abhors a vacuum, why isn't there more dust in the world?
    7. Re:Is it really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but we have seen many of these in recent years. You know, take out the plot, add long battle scenes, tons of free special effects, remove too sophisticated jokes, replace with pseudo comical moments and characters, and most of it have actors act like they are this far from laughing, remove any reference to non-politicaly correctness, make the hero really a hero and make him admired by everyone (if possible, make him not die, or maybe make the viewer beleive he is dead for a moment before having make a big comeback), make the hero follow ideals wich are uncommon for his time but are cherished by the american public (see political correctness), add weaponds...

      and so many other things....

    8. Re:Is it really? by dirvish · · Score: 1

      According to the little documentary of the making of the film that is on the DVD it was cutting edge. I believe you over them though. They are partial.

  8. Yeah.... as if it wouldn't have happened... by tvadakia · · Score: 1

    About time.

    --
    Unique.
    1. Re:Yeah.... as if it wouldn't have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why does not Matt Groening, the creator and executive producer of the Simpsons and Futurama make a cartoon version of the book.

      I think that he is the only one that could make a move that catches the charm of the book.

  9. The Movie Making Machine Takes Time by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 1

    A movie can take several years to be produced. Look at the Bourne Identity, the original printing of the Ludlum book was in '75.

    Good story fit for the effects technology available.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
    1. Re:The Movie Making Machine Takes Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Bourne Identity is a re-make (Hollywood's as innovative lately as Microsoft). There was a TV mini-series of it in the late 70's I believe, with Richard Chamberlain (sp?) in the starring role. Fairly good, too, as I recall.

    2. Re:The Movie Making Machine Takes Time by d.valued · · Score: 2

      The most annoying detail about H2G2, from a screenwriting point of view, is that it was originally a radio series.

      Radio writing is dramatically different than writing for the boob tube or the silver screen. You have to make allowances for the fact that the audience imagines the action, the characters, everything.. that you only have one sence to play with. With television, you have sight to worry about, but you are also limited in time.

      Movies are complex beasts... they can be elegant and simple a la 'Signs' (which I recommend seeing without popcorn because of the low tone of the film) or bloody and violent like.. do I really need a list of names?

      --
      I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
      Real life is underrated.
    3. Re:The Movie Making Machine Takes Time by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      A movie can take several years to be produced

      Look at the Bible. Took getting on for two millennia before they made the film.

    4. Re:The Movie Making Machine Takes Time by mge · · Score: 1

      Look at the Bourne Identity, the original printing of the Ludlum book was in '75.

      there was a tv movie in 1988 - Richard Chamberlain is all i remember. Is all I NEED to remember to know how bad it was.

    5. Re:The Movie Making Machine Takes Time by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      The most annoying detail about H2G2, from a screenwriting point of view, is that it was originally a radio series.

      And also from an effects point of view. The whole thing about Zaphod having two heads and three arms was thrown in as a joke because you can do that on Radio. Zaphod's second head originally spoke French. At some point in the second radio series it's implied Zaphod has grown yet another arm...

      Works well on radio. Needs good effects work on screen!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    6. Re:The Movie Making Machine Takes Time by d.valued · · Score: 2

      I don't know if you've seen the H2G2 dvd yet, but it's interesting to see what they did, on a shoestring budget, for Zaphod's second head (relatively simple robotics via radio control) and his third arm (second actor when needed for action, prosthetic when not).

      Imagine what a few million would do, besides keep the Teamsters happy ;)

      --
      I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
      Real life is underrated.
  10. Out of sheer respect... by cornjchob · · Score: 1

    I guess I'll be seeing the movie 47 times

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    1. Re:Out of sheer respect... by 0123456789 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Surely that should be 42 times?

    2. Re:Out of sheer respect... by kmac06 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I think you mean 42 sheesh

    3. Re:Out of sheer respect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42 times

    4. Re:Out of sheer respect... by NortWind · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here is arcane information, buried, for your enjoyment, in with many meaningless posts.
      Did you know that 9x6=42 if the base is 13.
      Think about it. You may now resume your day.

    5. Re:Out of sheer respect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think slashdot really needs a -1, Fucking Idiot moderation.

    6. Re:Out of sheer respect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and a -5, Suggesting "-1, Fucking Idiot moderation" moderation

    7. Re:Out of sheer respect... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Bloody hell, not that old base 13 chestnut.
      Douglas Adams said many many times that he had never made a joke in base 13...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    8. Re:Out of sheer respect... by Xilman · · Score: 1

      Quite right. It's entirely fortytwoitous that the answer to the ultimate question is 7 times nine in base thirteen. I blame overuse of the Infinite Improbability Drive.

      Paul

      --
      Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
    9. Re:Out of sheer respect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and you'd surely have gotten it this time.

  11. hmmm by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2

    It seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously...."

    What are the odds of Holywood taking a guy that's super funny seriously? 1,000 to 1 against.

    1. Re:hmmm by IPFreely · · Score: 2
      It seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously....

      More like, it took his death for the rights to transfer to someone who would actually give Hollywood permission to make the movie. DA probably held out. Whoever inherited the rights isn't holding out.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    2. Re:hmmm by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Read "A Salmon of Doubt". The movie had been stalled in production (with his full support), but a few weeks before his death, he met with the executive producer and got the process unjammed.

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    3. Re:hmmm by Bush+Pig · · Score: 0

      Of course, exactly the same thing has happened to Philip Dick.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    4. Re:hmmm by scotch · · Score: 2
      Maybe now the same thing will happen to Stephen King. You know, now that he's dead and all ...

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    5. Re:hmmm by The_dev0 · · Score: 1
      What are the odds of Holywood taking a guy that's super funny seriously? 1,000 to 1 against.

      And Falling!

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    6. Re:hmmm by chrisos · · Score: 2, Funny

      1,000 to 1 against. And falling
      Reality will be resored momentarily :)

      --
      If nature abhors a vacuum, why isn't there more dust in the world?
  12. Who'll play Ford Prefect? by sgtron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Might I suggest Ali G?

    --
    No todo lo que es oro brilla
    1. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by TQBrady · · Score: 1

      That would SUCK!!! Ali G is an ass . . . who is capable of being funny on occasion, but not playing a role such as this. The guy from Snatch and Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels and that new Woo movie would be way better

    2. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by carlivar · · Score: 1
      Michael Keaton was born to play Ford Prefect.

      Carl

      --
      Vote Libertarian
    3. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      No, no! The cast has to be British, otherwise the voices will clash with the way they sound in my head!

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    4. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      ah.. that would be good.

      I just can't place an arthur. some relatively unknown, solid english dude. You wouldn't want someone with star power in the role.

      Ian Mc.. whathisname, you know Gandalf, could pull a mean Slartibartfast I'd wager...

    5. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by trezor · · Score: 1

      Can you say imdb? Ian McKellen shows up...

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    6. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by radish · · Score: 2

      Ali G (not his real name obviously) is British...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2

      There can be only one choice for Arthur Dent... Hugh Laurie.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    8. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by eshefer · · Score: 2

      yuch..

      I would like Anne Dudley to do the music, though.. ;-)

    9. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by schon · · Score: 2

      There can be only one choice for Arthur Dent... Hugh Laurie

      Oh man - I think he'd be perfect... although if Michael Keaton is Ford (another great fit, IMHO), I have to wonder if their mannerisms would clash too much..

      And of course, the question still remains, who would play Zaphod?

    10. Re:Who'll play Ford Prefect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. Hooray! by ffatTony · · Score: 2

    Now my friends will finally be happy and I'll stop complaining that a "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" would have been a much better move to make then LOTR. (Note: I like LOTR, but I love Hitchiker)

  14. oh no! by anzha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am having flashbacks of another favourite author's book being made into a non-existant-movie (at least in my world). Heinlein would have mourned _Starship Troopers_ and now its ole Doug's turn to spin in his grave...

    Please. Make the pain...stop. Thinking about this is making me ill...

    There's a glimmer of hope tho with the whole treatment that LotR has received.

    --
    Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
    1. Re:oh no! by ianaverage · · Score: 1

      keep in mind that it was adams that has been working on the screenplay up until his death. if i remember correctly, he was quite pleased with the idea of having the jay roach direct it (wasn't there something about that is salmon?). i mean sure, they still can butcher it, but it is not like they are starting from scratch....

    2. Re:oh no! by Clue4All · · Score: 1

      True, but it would have done Erich Maria Remarque proud (author of All Quiet on the Western Front, for the uncultured).

      --

      Is your browser retarded?
    3. Re:oh no! by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

      Right - but the director of Lord of the Rings wasn't Jay Roach - whose latest work was that abhorrid movie "Goldmember". I liked Meet the Parents but I don't think this guy does intellectual funny. He does situational funny really well but that's about it. I could be mistaken about this guy, but I for one, I am not holding my breath for it.

      Bring on the towers!

    4. Re:oh no! by garcia · · Score: 3, Funny

      X-men, Spiderman, Hulk.

      LotR, Guide, what's next? Xanth?

    5. Re:oh no! by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      I think watching Starship Troopers would be an effective intelligence test. The film is satire, and rather brilliant in that regard. Forget about the book, watch the movie again and ask yourself: who were the bad guys?

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    6. Re:oh no! by Fesh · · Score: 2

      Does that mean that Uncle Orson has to kick it before we get to see "Ender's Game" onscreen?

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    7. Re:oh no! by Phyrexia · · Score: 1

      Starship Troopers, on its own, was a rather brilliant film. It's hard to compare the book to the movie, because they're both very different.

      Sure, it didn't follow the book, but it's not a bad movie.

    8. Re:oh no! by dswensen · · Score: 2
      More likely, Dragonlance with Jeremy Irons as Lord Soth and Matthew Lillard as Tasslehoff Burrfoot. Sarah Michelle Gellar as Laurana, I'm sure.

      I know, I know... for God's sake, keep my voice down...

    9. Re:oh no! by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      The longer, the better... at least, long enough for Jake Lloyd to get too old to be Ender :-p

    10. Re:oh no! by prnz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Forget about the book, watch the movie again and ask yourself: who were the bad guys?

      Paul Verhoeven and Edward Neumeier.

      Paul

    11. Re:oh no! by darkgreen · · Score: 1
      ah, but to actually ignore all that the book had to say was just... borderline insulting.

      I could see where V was going with the movie, but even if you took the original book almost untouched, it would have made for a pretty damn good script. As it was, the changes and ommissions made the movie /too/ camp... the satire and social commentary that survived was watered-down, and i'd even submit that the movie became a victim of its own critique.

      --
      You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
    12. Re:oh no! by darkgreen · · Score: 2, Funny
      Forget about the book, watch the movie again and ask yourself: who were the bad guys?
      ::
      :: Paul Verhoeven and Edward Neumeier.
      oh, damn, that was funny... wish I had thought of that... =)

      man, i wish i knew what moderation was and how to do it - that deserves some points!

      --
      You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
    13. Re:oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fucking shitwit. Next time you post a link, you fucking try it first. I don't ever want to see a referrer error after clicking one of your links again. Do you understand me, you warthog-faced buffoon?

    14. Re: oh no! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0, Redundant


      > > Forget about the book, watch the movie again and ask yourself: who were the bad guys?

      > Paul Verhoeven and Edward Neumeier.

      LoL.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    15. Re:oh no! by dpt · · Score: 1

      I think watching Starship Troopers would be an effective intelligence test

      If you like it, you have no intelligence?

      Forget about the book, watch the movie again

      I did *both* recently. The book was better this time. The movie has aged *very* badly, and it wasn't so hot to start with.

    16. Re:oh no! by Zoop · · Score: 2

      Not Xanth, DareDevil.

      And yet another try at Solaris with...George Clooney???

      Of course, it's been done, though you have to have a love of montages, a good eye for Soviet counterculture, and a seriously strong bladder to get it.

    17. Re:oh no! by core_blimey · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I think the redhead who ended up being killed was pretty darn hot.

      What you mean it wasn't meant to be a bit of fluff and you were meant to keep the brain switched on whilst watching?

      --
      In democracy your vote counts. In feudalism your count votes.
    18. Re:oh no! by trezor · · Score: 1

      I know that it should be technically impassible to produce anything as crappy as that old BBC TV-series. I couldn't stop being annoyed, even after some heavy bonging.... It was too horrible to ignore, and defintly not reflecting the brilliance of the book.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    19. Re:oh no! by iainl · · Score: 1

      Heinlein probably would have mourned Starship Troopers, I agree, but it doesn't mean I don't like the film. Verhoeven just completely disagrees with Heinlein's views, and I got the distinct impression from the commentary track that they only bought the book rights as a way of avoiding lawsuits from Fox over their 'Colonial Marines shoot lots of Aliens that look like insects movie' they were planning anyway. The chance to attack everything Heinlein stood for was just a bonus, really.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    20. Re:oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The movie was god-awful, even if you discount how it trashed one of my favorite books. Bad acting, campy war intermissions, and border-line special effects are the reason all copies should be burned. The fact that it trashed a fantastic book is just a bonus, really.

    21. Re:oh no! by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Well, Jeremy Irons is known for not being proud about the roles he is offered (he has done equal numbers of good and bad movies)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  15. Why 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really... why 47? Did you just pick that number out of a hat?

    1. Re:Why 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He picked it out of a rabbitskin bag.

    2. Re:Why 47? by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      47 is Weird Al's favorite number, he sticks it in all his songs.

      Yer.

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Looking Forward to It! by __aadhrk6380 · · Score: 1

    The guy got screwed, but his work pretty much stands on it's own, so his legacy there is secure. I just hope that they do the story justice. I am really kind of looking forward to seeing the special effects, given the advancements we have been hearing about lately.

    If nothing else, I advocate Brockian Ultra-Cricket at all staff meetings!

  18. Just like Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alternating between loving hollywood when they 'get it', hating hollywood when they f* up a really great novel, and hating hollywood whenever they buy a senator.

    So which is it today? I'll bet #2 just because Adams died (tragic :-( ). If he were alive, I'd bet #1.

    And there'll be 4 slightly elevated (score 2-3) posts bashing the MPAA.

    Oh well at least its not Thursday.

  19. Going to Reserve Judgement on This One by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    The scriptwriter for Chicken Run, Karey Kirkpatrick, is to complete the script from a draft version written by author Douglas Adams before his death
    last year.

    Really not sure how to take this one: Chicken Run was funny and well-made, but... It must difficult for Kirkpatrick to step in and finish something a lot of people consider a masterpiece. I don't envy his job.
    Austin Powers director Jay Roach is to direct, and Adams will be posthumously credited as an executive producer.
    Joy Roach is a good director (did a fabulous job on Austin Powers; although he did have a good cast and excellent script).

    I have a lot of hope for this project. It's nice to see Hollywood making at least one "non-teen-idol goes on a road trip/goes to college and finds them self" movie for next year.

    1. Re: Going to Reserve Judgement on This One by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful


      > It's nice to see Hollywood making at least one "non-teen-idol goes on a road trip/goes to college and finds them self" movie for next year.

      Hey - I liked Lord of the Rings.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Going to Reserve Judgement on This One by Blue+Zoo · · Score: 1

      Austin Powers was fabulous? Maybe you should go watch it again now that your fever has broken? I'm assuming that the fever induced delerium was the only thing that could actually make Autin Powers entertaining. None of the movies has ever been anything more than a predictable catch-phrase ridden stream of pointless toilet humor!

      Transitioning from a book to the big screen is usually a difficult prospect. I for one, do not want some second-rate hack destroying this story held dear by millions of readers!

    3. Re:Going to Reserve Judgement on This One by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Jay Roach is going to butcher the movie, I predict. The kind of hamfisted crap in Austin Powers is nothing like the subtle irony in Hitchhiker's Guide. I figure he'll probably cast Brad Pitt as Ford Prefect and Andre Dice Clay as Zaphod. Of course, Dick Cheney could do a cameo as Marvin the Paranoid Android.

    4. Re:Going to Reserve Judgement on This One by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
      Austin Powers director...


      THAT'S IT !
      Mike Meyers is the perfect Arthur Dent. That guy can do anything. He can be "Fat Bastard", anything.

      Settle down...settle down. It's late what do you guys think about mike meyers.....

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
  20. The HitchHiker's is not very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one of those cult things that doesn't have much to show for. At best, it is a mildly funny fantasy story - not sci-fi, for there isn't much in the way of science to it. At worst, it is downright silly - no matter how deeply in awe many may be at Deep Thought's answer to the question of life and everything.

    1. Re:The HitchHiker's is not very good by darkgreen · · Score: 1
      At best, it is a mildly funny fantasy story - not sci-fi, for there isn't much in the way of science to it. At worst, it is downright silly - no matter how deeply in awe many may be at Deep Thought's answer to the question of life and everything.

      Correct me if i'm wrong, but you wouldn't happen to have given any thought to the fact that that's the entire fucking point?

      sometimes I actually enjoy my light reading to be... well, um, light. If it can be silly and witty and not just a little irreverent to the genre or life in general, I think that's great, too. Hell, if you can't appreciate tongue-in-cheek humour, don't bother reading HHG, by all means, take things too seriously and you can keep your ulcers to yourself.

      So long, and thanks for all the Hrrmfs!

      --
      You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
    2. Re:The HitchHiker's is not very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Correct me if i'm wrong, but you wouldn't
      > happen
      > to have given any thought to the fact
      > that that's the entire fucking point?

      Profanity aside, the point was to come up with something mildly funny, at best, downright silly at worst? And this is the kind of thing so many in this forum are hailing as a masterpiece?

      For something funny and witty you go to Jerry Seinfield, Monty Python and the Marx Brothers. The HHG is just silly - an altogether different thing.

    3. Re:The HitchHiker's is not very good by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1
      For something funny and witty you go to Jerry Seinfield, Monty Python and the Marx Brothers. The HHG is just silly - an altogether different thing.

      I thought HHG was very similar to Monty Python stuff...except er... funnier :P

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    4. Re:The HitchHiker's is not very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I thought HHG was very similar to Monty Python
      > stuff...except er... funnier :P

      Sure it is. Just like the doodlings of a two-year-old are drawings, just as La Gioconda is a drawing.

      There is a difference between downright silly humor (HHG) and delirant one (Monty Python, the Marx Brothers.)

  21. There's more dolphins nibbling for fish here. by El+Jynx · · Score: 1

    Adams died relatively recently. I'm betting Hollywood couldn't do jack up to now because Adams refused it for some reason or other... and the end of the Guide isn't particularly positive, is it? Which was probably what Adams wanted in the first place and it certainly fits the strange script as I feel it should. Hollywood movies are wont to yield happy endings, a simmering love story and, as far as movies of books are concerned, often worthless translations of otherwise perfectly fine literature. I wonder if they'll also try to cram it into 90 minutes.

    Jynx

    Nah. They won't. (see reason below)

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
    1. Re:There's more dolphins nibbling for fish here. by JosefK · · Score: 1

      RTFA(tm). Adams himself was working on a script.

      HHGTTG has been in development hell for I don't know how long - at least since the mid-80's, when I saw Adams at UC San Diego (it would have been prior to the publication of So Long and Thanks for All the Fish) where he gave a reading and talked about, amongst other things, LA and dealing with Hollywood types.

      Adams was very interested in getting a movie made, and was quite willing to give it to the Hollywood system (probably in part because Hollywood is very much not unlike the universe in his books).

    2. Re:There's more dolphins nibbling for fish here. by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      I think I read something about how they weren't taking his script drafts seriously, though. I think it was basically that they'd put him in the "novelist" category and assumed that, like most novelists, he was clueless about scriptwriting. Hopefully they eventually found out about the vast majority of his work being scripts, but they were kind of ignoring his input early on.

    3. Re:There's more dolphins nibbling for fish here. by trezor · · Score: 1

      If Hollywood thought so, that might be because he wrote something like this in a letter to them:
      "I don't know much about making movies, and you don't know much about hitchiking the galaxy".....

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    4. Re:There's more dolphins nibbling for fish here. by Foniks · · Score: 1

      Douglas started his career as a scriptwriter and editor for the BBC. He has at least SOME idea of how to write a script.

  22. I heard him talk about it once. by Irvu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems that he's sold and re-sold the script several times. Each time the project appears and gets cancelled for one reason or another, usually a total lack of comprehension.

    He told a story about the time he sold it to one producer (if memory serves it was James Cameron of Aliens and Titanic fame). Anyway he worked on the script for a while in preparation for his first meeting with the producer.

    When thay meeting came around the first thing that he discovered was that the producer (cameron) the man who had bought the screenplay, had never read the book. When he was talling it, Adams allowed as how the book was very long and the great man might not be able to spare the time.

    However, he had read the executive treatment of the book (doubtless by the cliffs notes people), and he was very excited about the prospects for the film. But, before they could get going he wanted to discuss a few questions about the script.

    He began by asserting that he loved the fact that the earth blew up in the beginning that big, powerful, awesome, domething that would grab them into their seats. However, he had a real problem with the fact that they didn't get it back. He felt that they should devote a little more time in the script to a quest to regain the lost earth (he didn't specify how). But, he said that they could deal with it.

    The real issue was that whole question of life, the meaning of life was an important quest, a noble quest. It was big, and it would keep people emotionally in the movie. He also felt that it was good that they found it eventually... but... 42? Isn't that really...anticlimactic? Why isn't it an important message, meaningful, or something?

    Apparently there were some other sticking points too about how little of a role Arthur Dent played. The producer really felt that he should be leading the charge more rather than hiding. In short he really felt that Arthur Dent should be more Arnold Schwartzenegger.

    According to Douglas Adams it fell apart after that.

    1. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by oh · · Score: 1

      I also heard this story (at a talk he gave at the University of Sydney, Australia). I think it wouldhave been in '98? maybe '97 but probably '98.

      At that stage he was talking about the recent release of the Starship Titanic game, and lamented the fact that it was released for the PC before the Mac, which was his prefered computer platform.

      Getting back to the point, at that stage he said he had found a director and was working seriously on the movie. He went so far as to say that he was asked which label to release the video under, and that it was totaly up to him, but if he released it under the Disney brand he would sell twice as much.

      Since then I've been expecting to hear about the movie "in about a year".

      I'm very happy that he autographed a copy of Last Chance to See for me. I highly recomend this book to anyone. I wonder what would happen of more comedy writers turned their hand to non-fiction work. In this case the results were outstanding.

      --
      Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
    2. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by Dermot+the+Forg · · Score: 1

      I heard that too but I was pretty sure it was Ivan Reitman.

    3. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by ledgeerama · · Score: 1

      The director was Ivan Reitman and this was before he directed Ghostbusters. There is all sorts of information from Douglas Adams in The Salmon of Doubt (which includes what was written of the Dirk Gently novel he was working on when he died, along with essays, articles and interviews from him.) Well worth getting hold of if you are at all a fan.

      I'm quietly confident about the quality of the movie as DNA has said he is very confident in Jay Roach, who is directing it. It is going to cover the first book, or as he said in one of the interviews, "It's funny, because I've been looking around the Web at what people have been saying. I've seen, "He's going to put all five books into it." People just don't understand the way a book maps onto a movie. Somebody said, and I think quite accurately, that the best source material for a movie is a short story. Which effectively means, yes, it's going to be the first book. Having said that, whenever I sit down to do another version of Hitchhiker, it highly contradicts whichever version went before. The best thing I can say about the movie is that it will specifically contradicting the first book."

    4. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by Daniel · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reminds me of a story I heard about a Terry Pratchett book. Supposedly a Hollywood movie company was negotiating about making a movie out of "Mort". At some point in the discussion, the director said that he really liked the story, but wasn't there something that could be done about this whole Death angle? Apparently, people want an upbeat story and Death is a real "downer"..

      (the above may be completely apocryphal, but I found it amusing..)

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    5. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by JimPooley · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the producer who thought 42 was an anticlimax was Ivan Reitman.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    6. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2

      Btw, you forgot to mention that Mort was Death's apprentice and losing the Death angle probably wasn't a good idea. Anyway, Pterry himself related that tail so it is probably true.

    7. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by DrGreenGenes · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I heard him talk about it once."

      Yes, it was in 1984 when he first told the world that a film version was coming soon, and he was justing finishing off the script! It was on the front page of a (now long defunct) computer magazine.

    8. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Reminds me of a story I heard about a Terry Pratchett book."

      Why does it not suprise me that Pratt-shits name is mentioned in every discussion about Adams? Oh yeah, its because he is Denis Leary to Douglas Adams Bill Hicks.

    9. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by GCU+Friendly+Fire · · Score: 1
      Btw, you forgot to mention that Mort was Death's apprentice and losing the Death angle probably wasn't a good idea. Anyway, Pterry himself related that tail so it is probably true.

      Terry Pratchett (who still posts to USENET) wrote this in a posting about a film treatment for Mort, back in November, 1992:

      The Mort Film:

      A production company was put together and there was US and Scandinavian and European involvement, and I wrote a couple of script drafts which wet down well and everything was looking fine and then the US people said 'Hey, we've been doing market research in Power Cable, Nebraska, and other centes of culture, and the Death/skeleton bit doesn't work for us, it's a bit of a downer, we have a prarm with it, so lose the skeleton". The rest of the consortium said, did you read the script? The Americans said: sure, we LOVE it, it's GREAT, it's HIGH CONCEPT. Just lose the Death angle, guys.

      Whereupon, I'm happy to say, they were told to keep on with the medication and come back in a hundred years.

      Currently, since the amount of money available for making movies in Europe is about sixpence, the consortium is looking for some more intelligent Americans in the film business. This may prove difficult.

      It could have been worse. I've heard what Good Omens was looking like by the time Sovereign's option mercifully ran out -- set in America, no Four Horsemen...oh god.

    10. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
      Of course, it would be kind of interesting if Holloywood decided to make "Moving Pictures". I guess this was written after Pterry's contact with Hollywood. His idea of turning CMOT Dibbler into a producer was spot on.

      I personally quite like the Brigg's script treatments of DiscWorld and the theatre plays certainly go down well in the UK. However, I guess they would not do down so well in the US. The majority of US money is educated on the old Hollywood dictum of never overestimating the intelligence of an audience.

      However Red Dwarf is definitely being produced. HHTTG may make it (it has been there and back for so long), we shall see what happens. As for Pterry's stuff - maybe a rich Ozzie will put monie behind it?

    11. Re:I heard him talk about it once. by GCU+Friendly+Fire · · Score: 1
      As for Pterry's stuff - maybe a rich Ozzie will put monie behind it?

      Century of the Fruitbat Productions...

  23. BBC already made a TV version ... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2, Informative
    There is a truely excellent BBC version of this already made for TV back in the 80's

    The Hollywood version is sure to disappoint after this practically word for word BBC version.

    Since Hitchhiker's was originally a radio play it would be a lot of fun to start a pool on what a hollywood screen writer will have to do to the story to make it "work" for film :-)

    1. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by rcs1000 · · Score: 2

      Clearly this is some new meaning of the phrase 'truely excellent' that I was previously unaware of.

      Anyone who loved the radio series and the books found the TV series... well, disappointing at best.

      There is just too much surrealism to make the transfer to cellulose, or even the small screen, all but impossible.

      Take the moments after Arthur and Ford are picked up by the Heart of Gold: it is full of wonderful images like Southend washing up and down while the water remains still and the infinite monkeys that have just completed the works of Shakespeare. Remove the wonderful, joyeous surrealism and the books become suddenly much more ordinary.

      That said, I will watch the movie. And probably cringe, too.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    2. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2
      Ahh, but as Canadian from a small town my first exposure to Hitchhiker's was when TVO played the BBC series. Maybe I'm biased because I saw it on the small screen first.

      I have heard this "the radio play was much better" from several Brits so I'll take your word for it.

      The book was indeed pretty good :-)

    3. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by Dermot+the+Forg · · Score: 1

      Yeah what was the go with casting that blonde american chick as Trillian? Possibly the worst thing about the series (the rest of the cast were excellent).

    4. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      The radio play was much, much better. The actors in the TV series (most of them from the radio show) weren't terribly good as TV actors, and the production values were basically Doctor Who (i.e., god-awful). I just can't call the TV series "good." It's just a little less demanding than listening to the radio series (and even less demanding than reading the book).

    5. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by kogs · · Score: 1
      wonderful images like Southend washing up and down while the water remains still

      The difference, since the BBC TV version, is that we now have the technology to produce these images.

    6. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, might be time to try tracking the radio play down -- shorten the commute to work for a while :-)

    7. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by lurvdrum · · Score: 1

      Do! I recently bought both the first and second
      series of the original BBC radio series on CD. I had not heard the second series for so many years much of it was fresh again and it was just wonderful. ...the Shoe Event Horizon! Can I press the button now?

    8. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, the production values were the production values that one would expect from *any* television production from the late 70's or early 80's. I agree that the radio series didn't translate very well to this medium, but my bet is that this will be oscar calibre compared to the tripe that Hollywood will no doubt spew. Some of the tv series was incredibly well done. The problem is that you can't site down and watch the whole damn thing in one go. If you watch it, like a tv series, one episode per week, it is much more palatable.

    9. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by gorilla · · Score: 2

      The visual special effects are much better in the radio version.

    10. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by wwwssabbsdotcom · · Score: 1

      For the time it was made, the effects were 80's, but the worst was Zaphod's second head. Rubber bouncing around, but entertaining. Loved the BBC series for its time, all the books very humorous and well written.

      --
      Relive the BBS Past - One Byte at a Time! www.ssabbs.com
    11. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Celluloid. We put movies on celluloid.

    12. Re:BBC already made a TV version ... by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Look, the production values were the production values that one would expect from *any* television production from the late 70's or early 80's.

      You mean like Battlestar Galactica (1979?), which is about contemporaneous? Of course, BG is complete trash, and noone involved in it was worthy to lick DNA's boots, but they sure spent a lot on sets. Even Star Trek's production values were higher.

      But a lot of that is a function of BBC's budget and priorities, so perhaps we have to accept cheesy sets and mediocre costuming if we're going to get anything from them at all. After all, without BBC radio, and without Dr. Who, there would be no HHGTTG.

      (I always thought that Red Dwarf did a better job of integrating their late 1980s/1990s cheesy sets into the humor of the show than the TV HHGTTG did. Not that Red Dwarf deserves to be compared to DNA either, but it's an example of using what you've got.)

  24. Two words by Schnapple · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. Re:Two words by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      100% complete agreement. Good call.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
  25. w00t! by blazin · · Score: 4, Funny

    42nd post!!!

    1. Re:w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      42nd post!!!

      "Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it." --Arthur

      Cheers,
      Luke

  26. 47 equals forty-two plus 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing the movie 47 times would imply seeing the movie forty-two times, bringing a friend for five of the showings.

    1. Re:47 equals forty-two plus 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geeesh, looks like Eddie was trying to prepare tea again

  27. So is this going to be .. by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The movie of the original radio plays?
    The movie of the books of the original radio plays?
    The movie of the TV series of the books of the orginal radio plays?

    Because they were ALL different. And I much prefer the radio plays.

    (And I think there was also a soundtrack recording of the TV series in there as well)

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:So is this going to be .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, it's going to completely contradict them all. Otherwise it just wouldn't fit in.

    2. Re:So is this going to be .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HHGTTG also came out on LP not *too* long after the radio series. From fading memory it seems to largely be a rehash of the radio series, but doesn't *quite* mesh with the start of the second series, so clearly as with all the other versions, Adams subtly changed bits of the plot in flight.

    3. Re:So is this going to be .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm hoping for a movie of the INFOCOM game.

  28. It's often said... by molrak · · Score: 1

    ...that true genius is recognized by the masses until the genius has passed this plain. While the books are genius, if you ask Joe Blow on the street if he knows what H2G2 is, he'd probably think you're on crack. The real problem, as stated elsewhere, will be the end product. The thousand monkeys in LALA land have been known to ruin pretty much everything once they get their hairy hackneyed hands on books. Let's hope the BBC or Adams' estate insure that we get something that would have made him proud. If 'Salmon of Doubt' is any indication, it should be at the very least, quite acceptable.

    --
    You're only as smart as your brain.
  29. I hope the special effects budget is big enough by plagioclase · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see the infinite improbability drive really given the treatment it deserves.

    --
    Yeah, I have a webcomic...
  30. Who will play Arthur Dent? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    I'm thinking Dana Carvey should shoehorn himself into this role and redeem his "Master of Surprise".

    Robin Williams would probably be a better choice, though.

    The Rolling Stones(old and dead) would make a good Disaster Area, or perhaps The Who...(loud and louder)

    1. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by Oriumpor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gotta be someone Six feet tall ; P and they gotta look like an ape... any suggestions?

    2. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gotta be someone Six feet tall ; P and they gotta look like an ape... any suggestions?

      Janet Reno? :-)

    3. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by kylearin · · Score: 1

      Maybe Chris Barrie, Arnold Rimmer from the BBC "Red Dwarf" series, aka Lara's butler in the Tomb Raider movie?

    4. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by prnz · · Score: 1

      Chris Barrie would be perfect as Zaphod Beeblebrox. He already has the obnoxiousness and overblown ego down pat from playing Rimmer.

      For Arthur Dent I really can't imagine anyone other than Simon Jones, the original.

      Paul

    5. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by seedman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gotta be a Brit, I'm afraid. Just wouldn't be the same otherwise.

      I'd suggest Robert Llewellyn ("Kryten" on Red Dwarf, also the early, and IMO the best, host of Junkyard Wars (aka Scrapheap))

      Someone also suggested Chris Barrie ("Rimmer" on Red Dwarf, "Hilary" in Tomb Raider) who'd probably also be a good candidate.

      I also see a part for Rowan Atkinson as the captain of the Golgafrinchum "B" ark.

      Stephen Fry would make a great maitre d' for The Restaurant at the End Of The Universe.

      --
      "The things you see when you don't have your over-voltage cattle prod, a shovel and a sack of lime..." -- BOFH
    6. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by philipsblows · · Score: 2

      John Cleese?

      He's probably too old now, but perhaps circa Fish Called Wanda I think he would have had something to offer.

      Alan Cumming?

      For Zaphod, one that comes to mind is Billy Connoly. He's a Scott, but has a certain odd quality that I think would be fun.

    7. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by jjsoh · · Score: 1

      Well, this dude just retired. I'm sure he'll be looking for something to do.

    8. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2

      Just so long as it's not Keanu Reeves.

      Ewen McGregor maybe? Kinda short, but...

      Jason Mewes looks a little too pathetic...

      I'm going to get flamed to a crisp for this, but my choice is: Tom Hanks. And don't look at me funny until you think about it. He's got the right appearance, he's a hell of an actor, and it's been awhile since he's done a good comedy....

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    9. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by nurightshu · · Score: 2

      I, too, feel Roach should cast a Brit as Arthur, but I think my first choice for Arthur would be Toby Stephens, the son of Dame Maggie Smith and (last I heard, which was '95) with the Royal Shakespeare Company in Stratford. He's a hell of an actor, subtle and expressive, and has the right look for it.

      As for Ford Prefect, I like Jeff Goldblum (mentioned above) -- he's got that creepy reptilian eye thing going for him. Or perhaps Ron Livingston from Band of Brothers and Office Space, since he always seems to be about two seconds out of synch with the world around him.

      Trillian's tough, but I was leaning towards the woman who played Aeryn Soongh (or however the yutz you spell it) on Farscape. She's sarcastic and condescending, which I think would work out well. Plus, she's frelling hot, and soon to be needing work.

      Zaphod could be played well by Jason Lee (of almost every View Askewniverse film), since I always pictured Beeblebrox being really quick on the verbal assault.

      As for Marvin, I kind of like the voice of Steven Wright or Ben Stein. Droning, monotonous, utterly fed up with everything and everyone -- it's a good match, I think.

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    10. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by hitchhacker · · Score: 2

      > The Rolling Stones(old and dead) would make a good Disaster Area, or perhaps The Who...(loud and louder)

      If they decide to base the hollywood movie on the original radio series, then there won't be a Disaster Area.

      Instead of stealing Disaster Area's ship, they steal a super-evolving species' war ship. The TV series most likely changed it because they couldn't find a ravenous bug-bladder beast of trall in time. Read the Book or listen to the radio series (IMO they are much better).

      -metric

    11. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by JimPooley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Instead of stealing Disaster Area's ship, they steal a super-evolving species' war ship. The TV series most likely changed it because they couldn't find a ravenous bug-bladder beast of trall in time. Read the Book or listen to the radio series (IMO they are much better).

      The reason that changed was because the Haggunennon sequence of the radio series (together with most of episodes 5 and 6 of the radio series) was written by John Lloyd who was called in to help out as Adams was too busy working on Doctor Who to complete the scripts in time.
      Adams took out all of John Lloyd's material when he wrote the book - which rather surprised Lloyd as he'd thought they were going to write the book together. Lloyd did write The Meaning Of Liff with Adams though.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    12. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noo.. It must not be a funnhy actor or one who can look stupid. The whole point of Arthur Dent is no matter how good he is, he is just human and humans are just mostly harmless to everyone else. We should pick a serious actor who can't play stupid. You know, and he must somewhat look like an ape. mmh..

      Arnold Shwartzeneger (how to speel that?)?
      Van Damme?
      Hugh Grant is not a bad suggestion.

      Maybe one of these new actors
      Ben afleck?
      Brad Pit?
      that other actor I don't remember the name of

      anyway...
      Pleas no Robin williams in it... this movie can onluy be good if people are serious in it.

    13. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by 3waygeek · · Score: 2

      The Rolling Stones(old and dead) would make a good Disaster Area, or perhaps The Who...(loud and louder)

      From the books, it seems pretty clear to me that Disaster Area was based on Pink Floyd from the Syd Barrett/Roger Waters era -- several scenes in the book allude to real Pink Floyd events & songs.

    14. Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Pleas no Robin williams in it... this movie can onluy be good if people are serious in it.

      I wouldn't say Robin was right for this part, but, believe it or not, he's actually an accomplished dramatic actor. Watch Dead Poet's Society, Good Will Hunting, or One-Hour Photo, PLEASE, and stop typecasting the poor guy as Mork from Ork. :) Yes, he's done some terrible movies, and played some of the goofiest roles, but it's not all he's done.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  31. The trilogy was a novellization. by KFury · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How soon we forget: The books were novelizations of the Hith-hikers Radio Scripts, a 12-installment radio programme.

    "We had nothing in common: I liked watching movies made from books I'd read. She like reading novelizations of movies. It's no wonder she finished Lord of the Rings so fast."

    1. Re:The trilogy was a novellization. by JosefK · · Score: 1

      Technically, only the first two could be considered novelizations of the radio series. Even then, Adams considerably changed any number of things so that "novelization" falls somewhat short of describing the reality of the situation. Adams talked about the radio series being one thing, the books another, and the tv show yet another. The movie would (will?) be yet another thing. In some ways, the Guide is more like a comedy routine that gets reworked with each retelling than a single story that is simply being retold in different media.

    2. Re:The trilogy was a novellization. by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      How soon we forget: The books were novelizations of the Hith-hikers Radio Scripts, a 12-installment radio programme.

      Technically, only the first two could be considered novelizations of the radio series. Even then, Adams considerably changed any number of things so that "novelization" falls somewhat short of describing the reality of the situation. Adams talked about the radio series being one thing, the books another, and the tv show yet another.

      Good post. (Sorry, man, no mod points.) From what I remember, Adams pretty much knew he was going to do the books as soon as the first radio series got going. It's worth remembering, too, that radio works very differently from video: one can describe Zaphod almost believably, but one almost certainly cannot show him believably without a hug budget.

    3. Re:The trilogy was a novellization. by KFury · · Score: 2

      "...but one almost certainly cannot show him believably without a hug budget."

      Very true. Hoopy frood though he may be, Zaphod needs constant validation of self-worth from others. I imagine he'd run through huggers faster than Marvin would drive grips suicidal.

    4. Re:The trilogy was a novellization. by couch · · Score: 1

      And the third was a reworking of a Dr Who script that he never got made.

  32. In case anyone doesn't know by sydb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    H2G2's first incarnation was as a radio series. I'm pretty sure it's also the best way to enjoy Adams' work.

    The asides into the eponymous electronic 'Guide' seem a more natural fit to the dramatic medium of radio than to the books Adams released later (though I have read and enjoyed them all). Like a book, you get to use your imagination, unlike a book, you get an atmospheric soundtrack (and nice Vogon voices).

    The BBC sell the tapes of the original series. Also available as illegal MP3s at a P2P network near you...

    --
    Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    1. Re:In case anyone doesn't know by xA40D · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's also the best way to enjoy Adams' work

      DNA had the habit of re-writing HHGTTG on every incarnation. The Radio Series and the Books are not the same thing. But the TV series IIRC was mostly the book.

      On the whole I'd have to agree The Radio Series was the best - the pictures were better.

      Also available as illegal MP3s at a P2P network near you...

      Hmmm, haven't listened to my legal MP3z for a while....

      I wonder where I've put them?

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  33. The estate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copyright lasts for life plus 70 years. The studio still had to bargain with the estate for the movie rights to HHGttG.

    1. Re:The estate by Capsaicin · · Score: 1
      Copyright lasts for life plus 70 years.

      The guy said, until they could get the rights, which clearly involves the assumption that copyright still runs. Maybe Adams did not want his work butchered by Hollywood, and they had to wait for him to die before they could get the rights. Clear now?

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  34. Cast? by idiotnot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It'd be interesting to see who they'll cast in it.

    Dent: gotta be someone who can play "a complete kneebiter." British. I'm out of ideas on this one.
    Trillian: Elizabeth Hurley?
    Zaphod: No need to actually hire someone, just do some computer modifications to John Travolta's character from Battlefield Earth.
    Slartibartfast: Anthony Hopkins or William Shatner.

    Any other ideas?

    1. Re:Cast? by TQBrady · · Score: 1

      BRILLIANT I have always thought Hurley for Trillian. That seems obvious to me. How about Hugh Grant for Zaphod? He has to be charming, but annoying, simultaneously. I think Grant MIGHT be able to pull that off. The fellow from "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels" and "Snatch" would be good for Ford Prefect. I, too, am at a loss for Arthur. Perhaps Ewan MacGregor? Too young looking, I think. Your choices for Slartibartfast are perfect. Absolutely brilliant. There are not too many roles that would be served equally well by those two choices, but this is one. Diferent reasons, but similar results.

    2. Re:Cast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One name alone for Arthur Dent... Rimmer.

      I forget his real name, but if the cat can be in blade 2, Rimmer can be in H2G2

    3. Re:Cast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm... very interesting idea... never thought of it before. Chris Barrie (is that right?) might be able to pull it off, but I would worry that he has too much of an edge. Arthur is more of a harrassed plebe...

    4. Re:Cast? by WEFUNK · · Score: 2

      What about Slashdot in the role of the Guide? Sure, the Web itself was born to play the part, with entries on everything and plenty of erroneous information, but it's probably too pricey and prone to litigation.

      Actually, I wonder if the average movie fan might mistake the Guide for a cheesy and obviously fabricated Hollywood analogy for the internet. I can just imagine an uninformed movie critic discussing the symbolism of the Guide as a social commentary on the web. Even worse would be if a director or studio exec decided to intentionally play that angle (or the movie was rejected on those grounds). Sounds silly, but I could see it happening.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    5. Re:Cast? by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      How about Hugh Grant for Zaphod? He has to be charming, but annoying, simultaneously. I think Grant MIGHT be able to pull that off.

      For whatever reason, the Zaphod character always seemed like an arrogant Hollywood star (i.e. American). Somebody who is too slick for his own good at times....a playboy. Unfortunately, those kinds seem to be a bit lacking in Hollywood today. A young Burt Reynolds would be perfect, as would Travolta, minus years.

      One of the brat pack, maybe? Corey Feldman and Corey Haim?

    6. Re:Cast? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I think they need to come up with a way to bring in the surviving monty python members.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    7. Re: Cast? by elemental23 · · Score: 2

      What about Slashdot in the role of the Guide?

      Slashdot? No. The role of the Guide was made for E2.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    8. Re:Cast? by TQBrady · · Score: 1

      Like Tom Cruise? Yeah . . . I had him in mind for a character in the book. At one point - I think in the Restaraunt at the End of the Universe, a big-headed movie star in sun-glasses bumps into Zaphod. Read the description of the guy and picture Tom Cruise . . . that's him. Thing is: most of the cocky stars you're talking about couldn't handle this role well.

  35. I'll believe it... by Lordfly · · Score: 1

    ...when I see it. And ten bucks says it's a worthless pile of crap.

    The books are among my favorite to read, but I don't really think it would make a good American Hollywood Movie. It's all about the subtle British humor. And American audiences don't like narration much, which you would have to do in the movie, I would imagine. And do alot of it.

    A hollywood director, with hollywood actors, doing a hollywood movie, about a British cult-classic book. It's going to be on par with Battlefield Earth, I bet.

    Lordfly

    --
    hookers and grits.
  36. Recipe for success: by NME · · Score: 1

    David Lee Roth as Zaphod Beeblebrox.

    -nme!

    1. Re:Recipe for success: by presearch · · Score: 2

      You sir, are a casting genius.

  37. This must be a Thursday... by ocie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've never quite gotten the hang of Thursdays.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:This must be a Thursday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a Tuesday.
      You've never quite gotten the hang of the difference between the two T* days.

    2. Re:This must be a Thursday... by gid · · Score: 1

      The parent is a quote from the book, I'm sure he knows it's tuesday and not thursday.

      Besides, thursday is way funnier anyway.

    3. Re:This must be a Thursday... by nlh · · Score: 2

      Again with the no sense of humor. Kids these days, I tell you...

    4. Re:This must be a Thursday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it *isn't* thursday, so its *isn't* funny! You`ll laugh at anything I take it?

    5. Re:This must be a Thursday... by DrGreenGenes · · Score: 1

      "The parent is a quote from the book"

      Really? Otherwise....why would we have posted it, given that its wednesday today?

      "I'm sure he knows it's tuesday and not thursday."

      Then why would he have put `thursday` and not either tuesday or wednesday?

      "Besides, thursday is way funnier anyway."

      yeah, thats why Adams is famous the world over, and the original poster is just some twat on Slashdot.

    6. Re:This must be a Thursday... by xA40D · · Score: 2

      Well, I first read this on a Monday.

      I don't like Mondays.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  38. oh for sarks sake I told him it was 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never could write anything down when I was speaking to him

    claimed it was all a big mistake
    42 looking like 24 well I told him again and again well at least he followed my advice about the beach house

    regards

    God

  39. Well... by your_name · · Score: 0
    "It seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously...."

    Let rearrange those words:

    Hollywood took him seriously [by] waiting for his death to shame him.
    Ahh, there we go!
  40. Hopefully it won't be anything like the TV show... by zorg50 · · Score: 0
    I rented the DVD and could only stand to watch 3 or 4 episodes of it; it was just so BAD, especially Zaphod's second head. Hopefully the movie version will have better special effects than the "Escape from L.A."-quality crap.

    Then again, the show DID do a pretty good job of remaining faithful to the plot, at least as far as I got. Once screenwriters get their hands on books, they tend to cut the plot to shreds, a la Starship Troopers and Battlefield Earth.

  41. Great in theory but... by Spad · · Score: 1

    I can just see a whole bunch of Americans putting on very bad British accents being cast into the leading roles. Very, very bad prospect. The best interpretation of the characters I've seen was in the Illustrated HHGTTG.

    As for the movie being a new thing, Douglas Adams was working on it on and off for quite a few years before his death - it just never got anywhere.

  42. Re:Hopefully it won't be anything like the TV show by zorg50 · · Score: 0

    Of course, the quality WILL be much better in the movie, I just had to tell how bad the show was...

  43. 42, you idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in the subject line:

    42, you idiot.

  44. 24 how many times ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its 24

    I give up

    god

    1. Re:24 how many times ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *puff*?

  45. I hate to say this by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

    But could we pick a book, and leave it a book? Is that too difficult? (comments about the story's birth as a radio show aside) Books are great. I used to think that I would like to see a "Snow Crash" movie. But I am pretty sure I don't. Sure, there is a 1% chance that it will turn out to be pretty good and not ruin the memory of the book (like LOTR). But it could always end up just sucking, (Bicentennial Man) so I think its something to be avoided. Unless Kiwi nerds want to make the film. They seem to not be tainted by the dripping evil of hollywood.

    --
    Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    1. Re:I hate to say this by changa_lion · · Score: 1

      It was a radio series first then a book and after that a TV Series.

  46. The questions I ask by scotay · · Score: 1

    How good Adams' draft and how loyal will the filmmakers be to the spirit of the initial series?

    Kirkpatrick's work on Chicken Run and James and the Giant Peach were smart and retained enough of the British Sensibility that Hitchhikers is going to need to play for me.

    Despite all the arguments, I think the handoff of Kubrick's A.I. to Spielberg went surprisingly well. I actually have hope for this new project.

  47. don't panic by sstory · · Score: 1
    Now's my turn, i guess, to feel like the lotr fans felt before the release. Nervous that it'll be too compressed, miscast, etc.

    I think the problem here is, these stories are epic, and a 2-hr movie almost can't be. At the same time, breaking it up into 3 or more installments is fraught with danger.

    Also, so much of the humor in THGTTG is the language and syntax in the writing, much of which would be hard to translate into film--hence the BBC's inclusion of many of these passages in the form of narration.

    In conclusion, I guess the most important thing is, we'll all get to see a new interpretation of the material. It could be good, or it could fail, but if it fails, we've lost nothing. And if it succeeds, that's great.

  48. I'm sure the movie will be by rlangis · · Score: 1

    Mostly Harmless.

    --
    GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
  49. Brainfart by ForceOfWill · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I first read the title, I thought "Hitchhiker's Guide To Being Made Into A Movie" like the article was about a howto on being turned into a movie :)

    on topic:
    Wasn't there already a movie made of this? Or was it just one book? (sorry for my ignorant attempt at on-topic-ness :)

    --

    --
    Seeing is believing; You wouldn't have seen it if you didn't believe it.
    1. Re: Brainfart by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > When I first read the title, I thought "Hitchhiker's Guide To Being Made Into A Movie" like the article was about a howto on being turned into a movie :)

      I'm just waiting to hear that Hollywood is making Slashdot into a movie.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Brainfart by DeadMeat+(TM) · · Score: 2
      Wasn't there already a movie made of this? Or was it just one book?
      There was an awful BBC miniseries based off the first book and parts of the second book. (Adams said it was actually based off the radio series, but that it also included the revised parts in the books.) A lot of video places bill it as a movie, but it's just a miniseries.

      There was a story on /. a while back about this miniseries hitting DVD in the U.S., but you're better off pretending it didn't exist. The only parts I found funny were the foreword added by Douglas Adams (done in Star Wars giant-scrolling-letters-style where he declared that the proceeds from the sale of the video would, in fact, be donated to himself), and war between two civilizations being depicited as a video game, where after the narrator talks about coming to a truce and "evening the score" one civilization shoots the other's ship to literally even the score.

    3. Re:Brainfart by Radish03 · · Score: 1

      It started off as a BBC radio series, which I've seen mentioned around the thread. It was also made into a television miniseries for the BBC and recently released on DVD. There are five books in the HHGTTG series, the first published in 1979, and the last in 1992. The DVD above pretty accuratly portrays the first two books (if memory serves me), though it's rather old, early 80s, so it looks pretty cheesy nowadays.

    4. Re: Brainfart by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting to hear that Hollywood is making Slashdot into a movie.

      It's just a matter of time until some producer reads at -1 and sees all the captivating fan fiction involving the Slashdot crew. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Brainfart by chasec · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there already a movie made of this?

      Not a movie, but a BBC miniseries on TV. It consisted of six 30-minute episodes, and ended somewhere around when Ford and Arthur are stranded on the earth. (Was that Life, the Universe, and Everything?)
      A friend of mine has the DVD. I remember first watching it -- it was done pretty well for a low-budget TV show, but I had a totally different mental image of the story, from reading the books. I have a feeling that the movie will again be different than I expect, but I look forward to seeing it.

    6. Re:Brainfart by snerdy · · Score: 1

      There was a BBC produced Hitchhiker's TV series. Even though it was of fairly low quality, some people claim to like it.

      Whunk!
      -Dylan

    7. Re:Brainfart by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      The DVD's worth buying, as it does have a shitload of extras, some of which have never been seen before. The extras were put together by Kevin Davies - who worked on the animation in the TV series and can be seen in the end credits as 'Mouse Trainer' or 'Bath Superintendent', and is a good bloke.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  50. Truer words were never spoke by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    I can't imagine anyone BUT Terry Gilliam pulling this film off properly.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Truer words were never spoke by prnz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, but NOT until he finishes Good Omens. I want to see Gilliam's vision of that even more than HHG.

      Paul

    2. Re:Truer words were never spoke by mooman · · Score: 2

      Actually, for inexplicable reasons, I've always pictured Monty Python members in several of the roles for HGTTG anyway..

      In my mind, John Cleese was the slightly-off Ford Prefect and Terry Jones was the frumpish Arthur Dent.

      Shame that they're getting older or I'd have loved to see them considered for those roles...

      --
      In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
    3. Re:Truer words were never spoke by Schnapple · · Score: 2
      When I read the books, I always pictured Cary Elwes as Arthur Dent and Tony Slattery as Ford Prefect (watch enough old Whose Line... and you'll see what I mean). Also, in my "Perfect Version", the narrarator would either be an on-screen person or a voiceover (like in the miniseries), and would have to be John Cleese.

      Also, I think I read somewhere that when Douglas Adams had originally sold the movie rights (they eventually expired and he got them back, I think he sold them again once MIB came out and made the Sci-Fi Comedy interesting to Hollywood again) he had stated that the perfect Slartibartfast would be Sean Connery, so I always pictured him in that role. Picture "It was made from the rib cage of a Stegosaurus." in a Scottish accent!

      Granted, Ian McKellen seems to have the "old man in a famous literary role" market cornered

    4. Re:Truer words were never spoke by Thorkytel+Ant-Head · · Score: 1

      After hearing the unabridged audiobook of Hitchhiker's read by Douglas Adams (fantastic, by the way...check out Audible.com if you want to buy it on MP3), I remainly firmly convinced that Mel Gibson should play Zaphod Beeblebrox.

      And I agree with the idea of casting Tony Slattery as Ford Prefect. Brilliant.

    5. Re:Truer words were never spoke by TekPolitik · · Score: 2
      I always pictured Cary Elwes as Arthur Dent and Tony Slattery as Ford Prefect

      This is Hollywood we're talking about, making a movie about a book from a country other than the USA. Arthur Dent will be played by Ben Afflec. Ford Prefect will be renamed "Fordita Prefect", and be played by Jennifer Anisten, and the character will be in a long term physical relationship with Arthur Dent. Trillian will become a seductress played by Michelle Pfieffer, with the plot revolving around the love triangle. Zaphod Beeblebrox's name will be Americanised to "Zack Beechman", who will lose the extra arm and leg, and be a former high school quarterback from Cleveland, played by David Boreanaz

  51. "...how awful this will make it?" by Shamanin · · Score: 1

    ANSWER: 42

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  52. Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by Hentai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, I've always seen Jeff Goldblum as Ford Prefect; the description of someone whose social behaviors are just a little 'off', who smiles a little too eagerly and too earnestly, and who very deadpanly explains the end of the world just somehow pings off in my mind as his traits (especially look at his earlier, campier performances, like Buckaroo Banzai or Earth Girls are Easy)

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    1. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      Now that you mention it, Jeff Goldblum would make a great Ford Prefect. Great casting call. But what about Arthur and the rest?

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    2. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by Angry+Toad · · Score: 2

      I'm sure the fellow who played Arthur in the TV series is too old by now, which is a shame. The BBC TV series was pretty awful, with two shining exceptions. Arthur was, just to me, utterly perfect. He looked and spoke just about exactly the way Arthur did in my head.

      The other Great Exception was Slartibartfast, not sure what the actor's name was, but he truly grokked the character.

    3. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      I'd give my left nut, well, I suppose I would have to give both to be Marvin.

      Purely for the dialogue about the doors with Ford and Arthur. Damn I loved that. I think that the girl who played Amelie would make a great Trillian, assuming she can speak english with an english accent.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by fenix+down · · Score: 2, Funny

      DNA really wanted that guy to be Arthur too, but then again he was expecting Disney to do something with it 20 years ago.
      Yeah, Arthur with grey hair wouldn't work so well.
      I think Ian McKellen? Cellen? mCeLe3n? Whatever. He would be good for Slarty. That's what I kept thinking in LotR whenever Galdalf was being nice and condesending at Frodo. Looked and sounded just like Slarty.

    5. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      I think I read somewhere (Don't Panic? Radio Scripts?) that DNA wrote Arthur's role was with Simon Jones in mind. Of course, that was originally for the radio series, but he took the part over to the TV version well, too. If that's true, that would explain why he fit the role so well...

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    6. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by calice · · Score: 1

      Arthur = Edward Norton. He can be so blah... think of him in fight club all depressed.

      --
      Any information may be true or incorrect depending on your perception of said information
    7. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope Woody Harrelson is gonna be Zaphod Beeblebrox.

    8. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adams wanted Simon Jones (original Arthur) to play Slartibartfast in the movie. Replacing Arthur will be difficult since Adams wrote it with Jones in mind.

    9. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      I'm sure the fellow who played Arthur in the TV series is too old by now, which is a shame.
      Agreed - Simon Jones is a great guy, and at Douglas' memorial service he turned up with the dressing gown from the TV show, which he's kept all these years. Great bloke, and I hope he gets at least a cameo in the movie.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    10. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by Fweebles2 · · Score: 1

      Angus Deayton of KYTV fame (infamy)?

    11. Re:Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum? by gpinzone · · Score: 2

      I always pictured Mike Jittlov as a good fit for Ford Prefect. Who is he? Ever see the "Wizard of Speed and Time?" Neither has most people.

      Anyway, how about Howard Stern as good 'ol Zhaphod? Imagine two of those heads on the big screen. If this were twenty years ago, I'd have to say Eric Idle would be the perfect Arthur Dent. Besides him being too old, he's been typecast in that role so many times, I'd be sick of seeing him play it yet again.

  53. we apologize for the inconvenience by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    they are getting some other script writer to finish off Douglas Adams final installment (I pessimistically wonder how awful this will make it.)

    As opposed to how awful Adams himself coulda made it? :-) ....ok ok...that's really mean, but even Adams himself insisted that he kept on writing the series because his fans kept on wanting it, not because he thought that it should continue being written. he never really liked the new stuff anyway.

  54. Eek! by starseeker · · Score: 2

    "...before they took him seriously...."

    If they're taking him seriously, they're even more insane than I thought! (I got a headache just trying to read it!) Although, it would explain a lot about Hollywood...

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
  55. Please don't ruin this. by adelayde · · Score: 1

    Please do not ruin this excellent story and serial like you have so many other foreign and US scripts. Please please please. Isn't LOTRs enough for starters. Keep Hollywood cash out of your culture, and especially out of my fucking culture.

    1. Re:Please don't ruin this. by spacepleb · · Score: 1

      Too true. Some things are meant for the realms of the imagination. Films need making for those without any.

  56. I recently read the novel for the first time by heffel · · Score: 1

    And it was hilarious. I actually saw Douglas Adams once (he was a speaker at Java One, which I attended that year). I had heard of his work but never actually read any of it.

    I laughed outloud many times while reading Hitchhiker. I'm planning on getting "The Penultimate Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy", which contains all 5 books in the series.

    If you've never read his work I highly recommend it, you will not regret it.

    I look forward to seeing the movie, but, like many other posters, I am concerned it will not make justice to the book.

    Heffel

  57. final installment???!!! by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Apparently they are getting some other script writer to finish off Douglas Adams final installment

    This makes no sense at all. How many book do they intend to span with the first movie? I would think they would have a hard time doing justice to even the first book in a single movie. If they are going to get to the final book it will be a disaster. There is certainly no reason to do anything with the final book until after they see if the first movie is a hit.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:final installment???!!! by yoz · · Score: 2

      It's not the final book. Whoever contributed this story has it wrong.

      The movie is a retelling of the first book, but likely with some major changes.

      -- Yoz, who worked at The Digital Village while DNA was working on the drafts

    2. Re:final installment???!!! by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      No, probably just most of the first book, a little of the second, and bits and pieces of the others. Read A Salmon of Doubt for some hints.

    3. Re:final installment???!!! by startled · · Score: 2

      The contributor was wrong. As usual, RTFA. :) Adams wrote a script, but it wasn't quite "complete" before his death-- it was edited, but I guess not final yet. So the head scriptwriter for Chicken Run is finishing it up.

    4. Re:final installment???!!! by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Yeah, true to Hollywood form we'll see Cameron Diaz as the sweet girl who is lusted after by some wretched film school loser, Clint Eastwood as some retired guy who gives up Viagra to save the world from a foriegn terrorist and/or asteroid, and the whole thing is set in motion by an evil corporate executive, which dispite striking similarities to Hollywood's own executives, is never actually a movie executive.

      In short, the movie we'll see could just have well been based off of Oliver Twist, Dr. Seuss, or the Bible, it wouldn't really have affected the end product now, would it ?

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    5. Re:final installment???!!! by FlatEarther · · Score: 1
      We at Flat Earth technologies have been commisioned by Hollywood to make some minor script and casting changes. I am authorised to reveal some of these miniscule alterations.

      In order to appeal to the wider audience we shall make Arthur Dent a jedi knight who will be played by Mark Hamill. Ford Prefect will be renamed Han Solo and will probably be played be Harrison Ford. Marvin will need to be replaced, as a paranoid robot isn't going to appeal to kids very much - we suggest replacing him with 2 cuddly robots one which can't speak but just whistles in a kiddie-appealing kinda way and the other is humanoid. And instead of finding the ulitimate answer they shall go out and destroy the evil empire. We will need to throw some romance (HHGG is sadly lacking in this) for this we propose that our heroes rescue some princess played by say Carrie Fisher.

      I could go on but I don't want to reveal to much of the plot - but as you can see I think the result would be a great improvement ...

      The Earth is truly flat - it's only space that's curved

    6. Re:final installment???!!! by dapprman · · Score: 1

      So it's going to be based on the books ?

      rather than the LPs, or the TV series, or (in my opinion the best version) the Radio Series ?

      (seeing a 2 mile high tall statues of Arthur Dent in an IMAX cinema would be inpressive).

    7. Re:final installment???!!! by Duds · · Score: 1

      Well, The BBC did a TV series of the first 2 books and it was 6 episodes (180minutes)

      i.e - 2 films worth and that certinally wasn't slim.

      --

      If Douglas Addams isn't involved at all stages, frankly I'm not interested in this.

  58. Gotta be someone British! by MasteroftheVoxel · · Score: 1

    I say Hugh Grant

    Even though I don't like him, he has a certain amount of British charm... I dunno if he can pull off the sarcastic wit of Dent though...

  59. Mind vs Movies by darkgreen · · Score: 1
    I'm actually thinking that this is a bad thing - I mean, I love HHGTTG and have been a fan for years, ever since I first heard it on the radio late at night (ah, the good old days of cobbling together a radio out of spare parts and trashing an old telephone for speakers and other parts...)

    But some of what I felt was best about HHG was the fact that you used your imagination. It was intangible, and you had to fill in the blanks. To me, it's like the monster under the bed - nothing could possible top what you could make up for yourself.

    Putting a movie shell on this would ruin things a bit - perhaps a lot - for me. I look forward to this with dread, not anticipation.

    Then again, it /is/ HHG... i'll probably have to see it. =) Same thing with Ender's Game, if they ever get that off the ground, and i'm not thinking that would be an easy one to pull off in the least, either.

    --
    You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
  60. Hitchhikers game online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most excellent text adventure version of
    Hitchhikers is online here
    http://www.xcalibur.co.uk/games/hitchhik.htm l

  61. We need someone "small" for Arthur Dent by Wee · · Score: 2
    I'm thinking Dana Carvey should shoehorn himself into this role and redeem his "Master of Surprise".

    I don't seem him being able to get past his own ego/personna. Dent was 1) British, and 2) didn't make silly child voices.

    Robin Williams would probably be a better choice, though.

    Arthur "Patch Adams" Dent we don't need. Again, Dent didn't make silly voices and mug for the camera. He cowered and wimpered and was a very small fish out of very large water. I wouldn't mind seeing Alan Cumming play Dent. He can "seem small" well enough I think.

    Jim Carey as Zaphod would truly suck. I can't think of who would not suck, though.

    How about Steven Root as the Vogon Captain? Every see Tripping the Rift?

    The Rolling Stones(old and dead) would make a good Disaster Area, or perhaps The Who...(loud and louder)

    I think you hit this one dead on.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  62. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOLY SHIT! That is awful!! How could you post something like that? How could anyone physically *do* something like that!?!?

  63. The only success in this field was... by MasteroftheVoxel · · Score: 1

    2001: A Space Odyssey.

    Both Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick collaborated on the book AND the movie. They both had input on each other's work (in fact they came up with the whole plot together) and the book came out at nearly the same time as the movie (a little bit later even though it was supposed to come out first).

    Since it was planned to be a book and movie all along they compliment each other perfectly, with each giving a unique perspective on the story.

    Unfortunately, its otherwise pretty much impossible to make a decent movie from a book without being unfaithful to the book itself. They are just so different mediums. In the best case you end up with Harry Potter which is boring because its identical to the book or LOTR, which may be the only exception -- but I still like the book waaay better (the songs, the elvish script, - its all necessary).
    This is not to say you can't make a great movie based on a bad book - its just rare to have both become classics.

    As for the other method - writing a book based on a movie - well, we all know what that is about.

  64. Been in planning for a while by CybrGuyRSB · · Score: 1

    It seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously...."

    Actually Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy has been listed on the Hollywood Stock Exchange for a while.

  65. Arthur Dent == Hugh Grant by MasteroftheVoxel · · Score: 1

    not my favorite, but is British so can do the accent, is tall, is charming when he mopes, and it will need the star power.

    1. Re:Arthur Dent == Hugh Grant by Dermot+the+Forg · · Score: 1

      I remember one film reviewer commenting that when they heard Nick Hornby's book High Fidelity was being made into a movie and transplanted from London to New York they cringed. After seeing the film they were very impressed and couldn't help think that had the story been set in London, they would have cast Grant in the lead role and well... who has ever seen Grant doing the whole floppy-haired-bumbling-stifled-British-guy and not felt the urge to kick his floppy-haired head in.

    2. Re:Arthur Dent == Hugh Grant by swfranklin · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that nothing would keep me from seeing the movie... but Hugh Grant just might do it :-P

    3. Re:Arthur Dent == Hugh Grant by brianvan · · Score: 2

      OMG - yes, all along I've thought that Hugh Grant was the perfect... perhaps the ONLY Arthur Dent. He is the only person with the acting chops and the comic timing to play the part.

      Picture Arthur. He's in his mid thirties, he's somewhat meek, he's very British in character, and he screws himself up at times. Very much an antihero. He cannot be played as a thoroughly handsome person, but a handsome person playing an unattractive person will do. The part needs comic timing more than anything. Also, the part needs someone who can play a really unnoticable everyday joe caught in bizarre situations.

      I know that I'm American and I don't quite know the full range of British actors, but I can say that I know no one better to play the part. Watch "Mickey Blue Eyes" and you can see what I'm talking about. He can do the comic timing, and he's quite believable in most roles that he plays. I don't think Rowan Atkinson can do it - he might be well suited to another role, but not this one.

      Now who's gonna play:

      Ford - ehhh, I don't see Jeff Goldblum. He needs to sound British. You might need someone like John Cleese or Robin Williams, only younger and more handsome. Tough call.

      Zaphod - nearly uncastable. Early thirties, highly ridiculous, cocky, fairly handsome (remember, he's the galactic president), and you need to do the second head in a believable way. Could get away with an American in the role. Ben Affleck and Matt Damon can't do it by themselves, but together it would be a hoot. Then again, a better acting experience would come from Brad Pitt... Hey, get the guy from "Scream" and "Scooby Doo" maybe...

      Trillian - also could get away with an American in the role. Mid-twenties, and somewhat attractive but believably intelligent. Who can play the galactic newscaster type? Maybe Sandra Bullock, and that's based from her work in Demolition Man. This is NOT an Angelina Jolie role. This is NOT a Jennifer Lopez role. And please, not Cameron Diaz, Kirsten Dunst, or Amanda Peet. And if you give this role to Denise Richards, please just kill me.

      Slartiblartfast - This might be easy to cast. Ian McKellen may be too busy, though, and definitely overused. Can Donald Sutherland play it very aloof and ditzy? Hmmmm...

      Finally... as a cost cutting move, if you want Vogon costumes, look in the leftovers from "The Fifth Element". Those aliens sure were ugly...

      I'd go on, but I'm drunk.

    4. Re:Arthur Dent == Hugh Grant by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Ford - ehhh, I don't see Jeff Goldblum. He needs to sound British.
      He's a zarking Betelgeusian, for Zarquon's sake. Seem to remember at one time Goldblum was Adams' choice - but maybe he's too old now.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    5. Re:Arthur Dent == Hugh Grant by Nept · · Score: 2

      Hell freakin' no! Haven't you guys ever heard of Hugh Laurie? He's a british actor who has achieved a real following with the BBC's adaptation of PG Wodehouse's novels, as well as playing in several other movies (bio on IMDB). His role as Bertie Wooster in the Wodehouse series makes him the perfect Arthur Dent.
      Hugh Grant ... is just so sure of himself. I doubt he can play the real Arthur Dent, the man who continually wanders around the universe in his pyjamas. It just doesn't work.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    6. Re:Arthur Dent == Hugh Grant by hasse · · Score: 1

      I was just about to post that myself.
      Hugh Laurie is an excellent comedian and actor, and he's got the 'Arthur Dent-look'. Slightly bewildered all the time.

      He would be the perfect Arthur Dent.

      Stephen Fry would be a candidate for a role too.

    7. Re:Arthur Dent == Hugh Grant by schon · · Score: 2

      get the guy from "Scream" and "Scooby Doo" maybe

      You mean Matthew Lillard?

      Good call! I was scratching my head on that one, but I think he has the range and the physical appearance to pull it off..

      Trillian - also could get away with an American in the role. Mid-twenties, and somewhat attractive but believably intelligent.

      For Trillian, the only person I can think of would be Cathy Rogers (producer/host of Junkyard Wars)

      I can't see anyone but a Brit in that role, but if you did cast an American, what about Christine Taylor (Ben Stiller's wife - played Matilda in Zoolander)?

      Another maybe could be Tea Leoni, but she's might be a bit too old for the part.

  66. We need a female lead... maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *snaps fingers*

    JULIA ROBERTS!

    (Any one get the reference?)

  67. Babel Fish Translation by Shamanin · · Score: 1

    "Adams spent years trying to persuade Hollywood to take the project on and had become cynical about the project before he died."

    BABEL FISH: ...Hollywood won't have a clue how to pull this one off

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  68. It's been done! by rocjoe71 · · Score: 2
    The BEEB made a five-part serial of it over twenty years ago. The quality is Doctor Who circa 1970's quality so it's got zero chance of ever being shown on anything other than BBC, PBS or TVO but it's just perfect in my mind.

    It's been about fifteen years since I saw it and from what I recollect it was fairly true to the original story, I seem to recall they stole some small bits from "Restaurant at the end of the Universe".

    Personally, I don't think it should go through the Hollywood Bland-o-Mizer(tm). Douglas Adams just writes things into stories that you just can't act out-- like in "Mostly Harmless" where they find that guy on the beach 'who lives inside his house which is really outside of the rest of the world'-- it's just much much more fun to read.

    It won't make any difference to me if they make a movie for HHGTTG becuase there is no way you could convince me it's better than reading the book!

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    1. Re:It's been done! by Jobby · · Score: 1

      I saw this in a physics lesson quite recently. It's not bad since they leave in a lot of the explanation bits (like the Babel fish) in the form of badly-animated scene with a sarcastic narrator. The actors weren't brilliant though, and made the dialogue forced. One scene that was infinitely more powerful was at the pub, when Ford orders six pints of bitter, hands over a five pound note and says "Keep the change."

  69. No matter what happens... by slackergod · · Score: 1

    No matter how horribly the screenplay is botched,
    No matter little of the original book and radio show survives,
    No matter how inaapropriately cast,
    No matter how badly it's done,
    No matter how many figures it costs to make,
    just remember...

    DON'T PANIC.







    (This message brought to you by the
    Sirius Cybernetics Complaints Division)

    1. Re:No matter what happens... by Decimal+Dave · · Score: 2

      Of course, Hollywood will probably cut every reference to the Sirius Cybernetics Complaints Division. The phrase "Share and Enjoy" is like poison to them.

      --

      "Leave the strategizing to those of us with planet-sized brains." -Tycho
  70. Hollywood running numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this just an example of Hollywood accountants crunching numbers derived from the success of the BBC Hitchhiker's Guide DVD sales for the past few months?

    Are they just out to make another dumb, boring, cheaply made movie just so they can cash in on a specialty market...the geeks who like this stuff like me?

    Does anyone anywhere do anything at all anymore for the pleasure of it? In todays world the pyramids of Egypt would be built out of packing peanuts.

    At $8.00+ a pop now for movies, $15.00+ a pop for audio CD's, $40.00+ a month for cell, $50.00+ a month for broadband internet, $30.00+ a month for cable tv, and suv, yata, yata, yata...it's really getting hard to rationalize my life compared to people who have so little.

    Ah, life...it's pain, get used to it!

  71. Recycleable? by Chexsum · · Score: 0

    Read the book, seen the series, joined the BBS, played the game, visited the site!

    If Arthur Dent wakes up to a large yellow bulldozer at the start of the movie then I will probably fall asleep.

    Been there, done that, got the postcard to prove it.

    j/k - itll be an awesome movie!!!

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  72. For those that can't wait: Watch LEXX. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    It's the same vein of comedy as Douglas Adams, with just as goofy cast. Chances are, if you loved Douglas Adams, you'll absolutely love LEXX. The show is a riot, and hits the same damn funny bone every episode.

    1. Re:For those that can't wait: Watch LEXX. by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Yes, I hadn't thought of it like that...

      Zev==Trillian

      Stanley==Arthur Dent

      Kai==Ford Prefect

      Robot Head==Marvin

      Maybe ?

  73. I'm so happy... by CHiMP+GIRL · · Score: 1

    Weep.....I think I need a towel : )

    1. Re:I'm so happy... by AmbientNightmare · · Score: 1

      surely you have your towel nearby, as every one of us in this thread should!

  74. Complete Casting Call by Hentai · · Score: 1

    Arthur Dent - This is going to be a tough call, but my gut says recycle Mr. Bean.

    Ford Prefect - Jeff Goldblum, as I said before.

    Zaphod Beeblebrox - Brad Pitt all the way. Look at Fight Club. Look at Twelve Monkeys. Look at Se7en. The man can do 'nutball'.

    Trillian - Tia Carerra. I know, it never said Trillian was asian, but my image of her was always this exotic, immigrant British. If not her, than Mariana Sirtis (sans Troi accent, thank you).

    Slartibartfast - Gary Oldman.

    Vogon captain - Dennis Leary. Think about it.

    Voices for Trillian's Mice - Robin Williams and... Robin Williams.

    Wonko the Sane - Jim Carey

    Marvin - personally, I think they should use a voice synthesizer and generate all his lines synthetically.

    Anyone have any other ideas?

    I will also give this movie mad, mad props if they somehow manage to put a cameo of the entire cast of Red Dwarf in the scene where Zaphod steals the Heart of Gold.

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    1. Re:Complete Casting Call by swfranklin · · Score: 1
      >>Vogon captain - Dennis Leary. Think about it.

      Love Denis, but how about Mike Meyers a 'la "Fat Bastard"? :-D

    2. Re:Complete Casting Call by zapod4 · · Score: 1
      Trillian - Tia Carerra. I know, it never said Trillian was asian, but my image of her was always this exotic, immigrant British. If not her, than Mariana Sirtis (sans Troi accent, thank you).

      I always pictured Trillian as the one-eyed chick from Futurama. Too bad she is animated...

    3. Re:Complete Casting Call by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Wonko the Sane==David Bowie you dumb fuck! How could you miss that!?

      I like asian Trillian, although it sounds creepy when the guy named Hentai says it...

      Also, I hate Jeff Goldbloom. Just residual stupidity from Independence Day. Use David Thewlis instead. He was that creepy guy in Dinotopia, the King in Dragonheart, and apparently he's gonna be in Timeline.

      Mr. Bean might be good, but he's kinda too interesting looking. You need someone utterly boring in every way. Bean might actually work for Ford, though.

    4. Re:Complete Casting Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's switch Dennis Leary into the role of Marvin...I think that fits him better.

      I really think you need to keep the actors/actresses British as much as possible. Unfortunately, being from the US I don't know any except for a few...like Hugh Grant who shouldn't be mentioned for any parts.

    5. Re:Complete Casting Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vogon captain: the perfect guy would be Chris Farley, if he weren't dead.

      Hm. How about Brando?

    6. Re:Complete Casting Call by LoadStar · · Score: 1
      Trillian - Tia Carerra. I know, it never said Trillian was asian, but my image of her was always this exotic, immigrant British. If not her, than Mariana Sirtis (sans Troi accent, thank you).

      No... not Asian at all. Her real name was Tricia McMillan, and in an alternate reality, she was a high-flying news anchor.

      What about Chloe Annett, who played Christine Kochanski in Red Dwarf? Alternately, I like Rowena King, who currently stars in the Bravo TV series "Breaking News." Chloe would probably have an easier time with the comic timing - Rowena is a drama actor, at least she is currently.

    7. Re:Complete Casting Call by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      Brad Pitt as Beeblebrox? Feckin' brilliant! He'd be perfect, I think. Manic, vain, and cool. Now I'll be disappointed if he's not.

      I can accept Tia Carrera as Trillian, although I was thinking perhaps Uma Thurman could pull it off well.

      Slartibartfast? Gary Oldman is too hammy, methinks. I like the Ian McKellen choice someone else suggested, even though I recognize that's a bit too obvious.

      Vogon Captain: Robbie Coltrane.

      Marvin: Couldn't they get the same fellow who did Marvin for the radio show? It's just a voice, after all. I have a hard time imagining anyone besting his tone of strained ennui.

      Voice of the Guide: John Cleese

      Arthur: Hard choice. Rowan Atkinson isn't average enough. Hugh Grant is probably the best choice I've heard so far, but I don't think he could carry off Arthur's pointed sarcasm. I have to think some more.

      (And we haven't even mentioned Deep Thought or Eddie yet.)

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    8. Re:Complete Casting Call by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      The Vogon captain should definately be played by none other than JarJar Binks. I mean he's pretty much unemployed now, and face it, wouldn't listening to JarJar recite poetry make you want to die?

      Cheers,
      Jonathan

    9. Re:Complete Casting Call by trezor · · Score: 1

      Damn! How could I forget about Chloe?

      But how old is she getting these days? Red Dwarf been off the air for a while now. At least where I live.... )-:

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    10. Re:Complete Casting Call by hitchhacker · · Score: 2

      > Arthur Dent - This is going to be a tough call, but my gut says recycle Mr. Bean.

      My vote goes for Keanu Reeves.

      All you would need to do is tell him to say "What", "I don't understand", and "Where's the tea".
      Who would know the difference? :)

      Plus, I think the role in The Matrix would amplify the world is a computer effect. After all, The Matrix surely came from HGTTG. Deep thought even says: "A computer so large that organic life will make up part of it's operational matrix". (or something like that).

      Arthur: Keanu Reeves
      Ford: Jeff Goldblum
      Zaphod: Brad Pitt
      Trillian: Elizabeth Hurley

      ouch.. that would be an expensive movie. :(
      I go with MsGeek on this one, and make it an animated film. 3D graphics over the original radio series.

      -metric

    11. Re:Complete Casting Call by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Arthur Dent - This is going to be a tough call, but my gut says recycle Mr. Bean.

      Oh my god NO!!!!!! Rowan Atkinson hasn't done anything good since the last series of Blackadder - and is totally wrong for the part of Arthur Dent...

      Trillian - Tia Carerra. I know, it never said Trillian was asian, but my image of her was always this exotic, immigrant British. If not her, than Mariana Sirtis (sans Troi accent, thank you).

      I seem to remember that in the book, Trillian is described as arabic-looking.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    12. Re:Complete Casting Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are going to have to have this Hentai person killed before he gets a job in casting. Shit, Jeff Goldblum? Are you fucking insane?

    13. Re:Complete Casting Call by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      Trillian - Tia Carerra

      Close....but I'd pick Asia Carrera for that role...mmmmmm

      --
      Burma?
    14. Re:Complete Casting Call by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      Douglas Adams seemed to like the idea.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    15. Re:Complete Casting Call by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2

      Wrong Hugh. Hugh Laurie would be better. If you want pointed sarcasm, his Mr Palmer in the Ang Lee version of Sense and Sensibility was nothing but pointed sarcasm, and he is similiary sarcastic in his role as the head of MI5 in the recent series 'Spooks'.
      He's not a totally unknown name in the US either, as he's the father in Stuart Little. On TV he was in the third and fourth Blackadder series (as Prince George and Lieutenant George), and also Wooster in the 1990 series.
      Finally, and the clincher - I'd heard it reported on more than one occasion that Adams himself liked the idea of Hugh Laurie.

    16. Re:Complete Casting Call by schon · · Score: 2

      Trillian - Tia Carerra. I know, it never said Trillian was asian, but my image of her was always this exotic, immigrant British. If not her, than Mariana Sirtis (sans Troi accent, thank you)

      No way! Tia Carrere can't play anyone but Tia Carrere - she's a horrible actress!

      And Marina Sirtis is way too old to be picked up at a party by Zaphod.

  75. How can I contact Jay Roach? by carlivar · · Score: 1
    I need to get a hold of Jay Roach. Let him know NOT to fuck this up. Offer my services of 'advisor' over a few beers, perhaps. I'm in the L.A. area, why not? The overall "mood" of this movie will be very tricky to pull off.

    Carl

    --
    Vote Libertarian
  76. Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should be books - I read them all and also Dirk Gentlys. Douglas Adams was a good writer - its too bad that he didnt write more books. :\

    BTW, this is passable as news for geeks!

  77. I seriously doubt.... by JojoCoco · · Score: 1

    ... That they can top the BBC version. Its just so eighties and well, I think the cheesey production kinda captures the essence of who Douglas Adams was. I dont think he was meant to be big budget, but then again I am going to see this when it comes out. So I could be wrong. But if you havent seen the BBC version, and enjoy Douglas Adams, rent it. Now.

  78. poetry by Mr+Foot · · Score: 1, Funny

    The dead swans lay in the stagnent pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occassionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal. Paula Nacy Millstone Jennings 37 Wasp Villas Greenbridge Essex GB10 1LL

  79. NO! Not possible! NEVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOOO! This can't be happening. I love the books so much. For this *thing* to exist, evryone would claim to be an expert. I remember what happened with LOTR. I can't take this. It's going to ruin something so marvelous and brialliantly conceived, I really can't take this. I'm going to lay down, not think about this, and reread the books for the forty millionth time.

    I will not see this movie. Don't give me crap about "If you don't like it don't go see it." Ialready know that. I hope the producers will burn in Hitchhiker hell forever.

    BTW, I won't be an anonymous coward for long...just waiting for my passwd...

    In advance, I'm not sorry for my views whether others consider them vulgar or not. Everyone in this world is entitled to their own opinion.

  80. Re:Greg's Previews has had info on this for two ye by WEFUNK · · Score: 2

    Coming Attractions has a very detailed and up-to-date listing for HHGTTG.

    The write-up is obviously by a fan; includes this little known tidbit under "Rumors":

    "Word has it the ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal is asking for a cameo or else he'll eat one of the associate producers."

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
  81. accents by phriedom · · Score: 1

    Isn't Arthur Dent really the only one that needs a British accent? Xaphod, Ford, Trillian, etc. aren't from the UK, so why not let them have any old accent?

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:accents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trillian is from the UK. Tricia McMillan. Ever read "Mostly Harmless," the last book in the series?

    2. Re:accents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the first one. Zaphod picked her up at the party in Islington. Actually, she could have been from somewhere else, but it's a long way to go for a crappy British party. If you're gonna leave the country for a party, at least go to Brazil or someplace cool.

    3. Re:accents by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Trillian is from the UK.

      She is actually from New York. Remember delivery pizza? A UK accent would work for her though, as long as it had some american influence.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:accents by chrisos · · Score: 1

      Tell me if I'm wrong* but wasn't the whole pizza delivery thing related to one of the Dirk Gently novels?

      Or was this a reused joke I didn't pick up on?

      IIRC Trillian was picked up by Zaphod at a party in Ealing that Arthur attended.

      On another note, I'm sure all you Americans who haven't visited the UK yet, will be pleased to know that pizza delivery is now nearly ubiquitous. In fact, crossing the streets of London without having an incident with a pizza delivery boy on a moped gets you on the evening news on all major channels.

      * Nah don't bother :)

      --
      If nature abhors a vacuum, why isn't there more dust in the world?
    5. Re:accents by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Tell me if I'm wrong* but wasn't the whole pizza delivery thing related to one of the Dirk Gently novels?
      Woo, you are right. That was Kate and the pizza delivery, my memory is going out.

      IIRC Trillian was picked up by Zaphod at a party in Ealing that Arthur attended.

      Islington I believe, and Zaphod gate crashed and Arthur was trying to pick up on Trillian. Which is why Arthur didn't like Zaphod from the beginning.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:accents by chrisos · · Score: 1

      Woot, I've found someone as obsessive as me about DA's stuff :)

      --
      If nature abhors a vacuum, why isn't there more dust in the world?
    7. Re:accents by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Woot, I've found someone as obsessive as me about DA's stuff :)

      Absolutely. Not only do I read them, but I buy copies for friends to read for good measure. I think mostly so I can make jokes in regards and the get them instead of looking at me like I'm entirely, but not quite, insane.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  82. Just Some Names To Kick About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arthur: Tim Roth
    Ford: ??? (Maybe Hugh Grant, but doesn't feel right)
    Zaphod: Gary Oldman
    Trillian: Elizabeth Hurley(Don't know if she could work with Hugh again, but take her before Hugh for sure)
    Slartibartfast: Anthony Hopkins

    BTW, there was some talk in a previous episode of Slashdot on who the next Superman should be and for my 2 cents it should be Paul Gross. He starred in the critically acclaimed "Aspen Extreme" and the TV series "Due South". Just a thought.

  83. Strange ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    ... that this happens time and time again: Great artists aren't recognized until after they're dead.

  84. This seems familiar... by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

    There has been talk about a HHGG movie for at least 10 years now in alt.fan.douglas-adams. I'm glad to see that it's finally happening. It's funny how similar the comments here on /. are to the 8 and 10 year old discussions on Usenet. Particularly, I remember how the who-should-play-who thread goes:

    Someone gives their ideal cast, which includes some Yanks. This is immediately followed by someone demanding that the entire cast should be British. Then someone points out that Ford could be played by an Yank, since he was an alien, and not really true Brit...

    1. Re:This seems familiar... by TheLostOne · · Score: 1

      Then someone points out that Ford could be played by an Yank, since he was an alien

      Maybe he should be played by a Californian

      --


      '..that kernel panicked like a nun in a crack house!'
  85. Unnecessary endorsement? by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1

    ...If you've never read his work...

    Somehow, I think that you're very unlikely to find many Slashdot readers that fall into this category.

    Actually, for this venue, I'd wager this is roughly akin to saying "For those of you who've never heard of Tolkein", or looking for readers who've no idea what Star Trek is/was.

  86. what about dirk gently.... by Gimpy-Joe · · Score: 1

    anyone else notice how bbc news omited "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" and "The Long Dark Tea Time of the Soul" from their list of other notable works...

    --
    Good luck in hell.
  87. Pixar/Zaphod by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1
    If Pixar's contract with Disney hasn't expired by that time, how cool would it be to have them animate the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation robots?

    "All the doors in this spaceship have a cheerful and sunny disposition." Pixar's bright, plastic style of character modeling would fit like a glove :)

    Also, since Zaphod Beeblebrox has two heads, are they going to get two actors to play him? And if so, who's body are they going to use? And what about the arms? :P

    1. Re:Pixar/Zaphod by N+Monkey · · Score: 2
      If Pixar's contract with Disney hasn't expired by that time, how cool would it be to have them animate the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation robots?

      And here was me thinking Sirius Cybernetics Corp was modelled on a company in Seattle....

      "Share and Enjoy,
      Share and Enjoy,
      With your plastic boy
      Or girl by your side...."

      (pardon any misquoting).
  88. True by yoz · · Score: 2

    It was Reitman. Check Neil Gaiman's "Don't Panic"

    -- Yoz

  89. Back in the day it was done... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 2

    As a mini series... I've seen it, and it does no justice to the book. I think I fell asleep during watching it more than once.

    IMDB Entry

  90. If you've read "Salmon of Doubt"... by abhinavnath · · Score: 1

    The current unfinished novel is a Dirk Gently story. There are letters by Douglas Adams saying that the universe of the novel had become much closer to a Guide sort of universe than a Dirk Gently sort of world, and that he planned to convert it to a Hitchhiker's Guide story. It remains, however, a Dirk Gently story.

    He had apparently completed parts of three drafts, and the published story has chapters from all three drafts. I don't know how many people here have read "Salmon of Doubt", but I personally found the story extremely intriguing. Unfortunately it ends prematurely, leaving the reader hanging at a very interesting point in the story - "Extreme Winds... May Exist". I highly recommend it, if for nothing more than the insight it provides on Douglas Adams' writing process.

    --
    My other sig is also a .Porsche
  91. Hitchhiker's Guide to BEING in a movie?! by messiertom · · Score: 1

    I never thought a movie might be made about hitchhikers... is it an independent studio or what?

    Oh, wait...

  92. Directed by... by AmbientNightmare · · Score: 1

    This movie would come off perfect if they gave it to one man....Guy Ritchie. No...really...think about it....Lock Stock and Snatch were TERRIFIC movies, with a style and humor similar to HHGTTG. I want Jason Statham as Arthur Dent. All the man needs is some hair and he's perfect. The type of droll wit neccesary to carry the role. And, I actually like the idea said before about Pixar providing the special effects.

  93. Taking Douglas Adams seriously...? by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

    it seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously...

    You're not supposed to take him seriously; he is (was) a comedy writer.

    RMN
    ~~~

    1. Re:Taking Douglas Adams seriously...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This from a subculture with the phrase "Ha ha, only serious" in their printed phrasebook? It's politics, philosophy and religion that you're not supposed to take seriously.

    2. Re:Taking Douglas Adams seriously...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And does anyone?

  94. Zaphod - Bruce Campbell by lowe0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly, the only man who can play Zaphod is Bruce Campbell. Just pull out your copy and let his voice read some of the lines in your head. Trust me, Bruce is the only man who could deliver, "If there's anything more important than me, I want it caught and shot." (Yeah, I probably misquoted. I'm too lazy to reach the two feet away my copy is sitting and look it up.)

    I hope someone gets this script to Bruce... I'd love to see the role go to him.

    1. Re:Zaphod - Bruce Campbell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there were ever a man for the job, it's Campbell. If only i had mod points...

    2. Re:Zaphod - Bruce Campbell by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      Good Zaphod.. Bad Zaphod... I'm the one with the heads baby.

      That would be sooo cool. Bruce would have my vote.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    3. Re:Zaphod - Bruce Campbell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea! He's already done the 2 heads thing in 'Army of Darkness'

    4. Re:Zaphod - Bruce Campbell by tuxedo-steve · · Score: 1

      Jesus christ, you are so right. I have never seen a more insightful post on slashdot. I'm starting a petition to allow this post to be modded up to 6. :)

      --
      - SMJ - (It's not just a name: it's a bad aftertaste.)
    5. Re:Zaphod - Bruce Campbell by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      Won't work. Bruce Campbell is great, don't get me wrong. But if you've ever heard the radio show, books on tape, or watched the BBC miniseries made of the first two books, you'd realize that Bruce can't play the part because you really REALLY need to have someone with a British accent in the role(s). American actors just won't cut it for most of the roles in this film - much in the same manner that Harry Potter was filmed with an all-European cast.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    6. Re:Zaphod - Bruce Campbell by schlach · · Score: 1

      Suggestion noted.

      Maybe Zaphod would take a hit from a not-so-English type, but Bruce "Don't call me Zaphod" Campbell would more than make up for it with what he can bring to the table.

      Bruce would be *such* a good idea. Somebody call his agent...

    7. Re:Zaphod - Bruce Campbell by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Hey, man... this MOVIE is, like, totally INTRAGALACTIC, man.

      Wild space creatures with three arms and two heads don't always speak with a British accent, you know. The ape-man Arthur is British, through and through. But, if any character in this world should be, you know, an OUT-there Americano-type, it's Zaphod Beeblebrox, President of the Galaxy, man! Loud, abrasive, selfish, AND charismatic. Yeah, Bruce Campbell fits, baby!

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  95. It's "gusty winds", actually. [NT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe it's "gusty winds", actually (both on the sign and the name of the half-cat).

    1. Re:It's "gusty winds", actually. [NT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. D'oh!

  96. Hitchhiker's guide mini-series by Nept · · Score: 2

    How many people saw the early 80s mini-series of THGTTG. On the whole, I rather liked it. It had a lot of the same people as the radio series, Simon Jones as the Book, Peter Jones as Arthur and the same guy for Ford Prefect.

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    1. Re:Hitchhiker's guide mini-series by drewness · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Geoffrey McGovern was Ford in the radio show and David Dixon was Ford in the TV series. But, Mark Wing Davey was Zaphod in both. Oh, and you have your Jones's backwards. :)

  97. Respect by sephkunyui · · Score: 1

    If the movie is finished it can only be a shadow to what could have been. I'd rather have the crappy 70's version that Adams didn't participate in than a version where someone tries, and fails, to finish where Adams started.

  98. Why bother? by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1
    The BBC radio version was a masterpiece, and still available from bbcshop.com in a collector's edition. All a movie version will do is bomb at the box office and piss off every geek who loved the book.


    Jack

    1. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, just like LOTR, right? oh wait...

    2. Re:Why bother? by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1

      HG isn't LotR. Not by a long shot.

  99. Xanth &The Color of Her Panties by Myriad · · Score: 2
    LotR, Guide, what's next? Xanth?

    Hrmm, given some of the colourful titles in the Xanth series that might not be such a good idea.

    Would you tell your girlfriend you and the guys were off to see "The Color of Her Panties"? I'd love to see that... somehow I don't think you'd have long to live though.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Xanth &The Color of Her Panties by matticus · · Score: 2

      you're kidding, right? Slashdot readers don't have girlfriends or "the guys". Otherwise they wouldn't be posting.
      Oh wait. what does that say about me?
      I better tell the gf I need to go out with the guys...

  100. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, we make a big mistake letting America go... now see what a mess the world is in

  101. Hugh Grant as Zaphod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I think Hugh Grant could be a good Zaphod, if he had a goofy second head attached and an extra arm.

    Think of the scene where Zaphod goes into the machine that shows you your place in the universe, intended to torture by demonstrating how puny you are, but Zaphod sees himself - as center of the universe, just as he expected.

    I could see Hugh Grant pulling that off well.

    But Grant also does that sort of goofy chummy thing that Zaphod does.

  102. Animated... by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Frankly, I have always thought that H2G2 would be best done as an animated movie. My choice to do the honors: Pixar, with John Lasseter as director. This would mean that Pixar would be forced to do a movie with a fair amount of humans in it, but considering how well they did humans in Toy Story II and Monsters Inc. they are up for the task.

    Back when Disney had the movie rights, this would have actually had realistic chances of success. Now that Disney and The Ego Who Ate The World, aka Steve Jobs, are feuding and Disney apparently lost the rights, this is highly unlikely.

    H2G2: International Guidebook Of Mystery? It doesn't look good folks...[sigh]

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Animated... by hitchhacker · · Score: 2

      > Frankly, I have always thought that H2G2 would be best done as an animated movie.

      great idea.

      It would be neat to use the original radio broadcast for the audio... then just the animation would be needed. They wouldn't need to change the script to avoid the ravenous bug-bladder beast of trall. (like the tv series did)

      I wonder if an online community could pull this off with enough support... good way to learn blender when it goes open source. :)

      -metric

  103. ME!!! by Alan+Holman · · Score: 1

    I grew up on Douglas Adams' work, and my series GOLDEN CITY is based on it! I should complete the script! Read GOLDEN CITY at my site.

  104. Web Site by Bobulusman · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case anyone is not aware, the HGTTG web site the article mentions is http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/. It's the most ambitious, IMHO, of Douglas Adam's projects. Basically, it's an online Guide that you submit information to, the way the Guide in the books is described. It's been running for a few years now, and has quite a bit of stuff.

    The page that DNA submitted about the site can be found here.

    Of course, I'm such a nerd that I've actually submitted an article. Yes, I know I'm a geek....

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  105. oh my god..he is dead? by chrispycreeme · · Score: 1

    I can't believe it! what a way to find out. On slashdot no less. geeze. I hope the movie doesn't suck tho..

  106. Re:It's been done! - the DVD is out now by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    Actually, a DVD collecting all episodes was just released. The video quality is limited by the original video.

  107. animals hurt?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hopefully, no dolphins will be harmed when they show them saying, "so long, and thanks for all the fish"...not to mention the scenes with Agrojag (sp?)

    Oh super intelligent hues of blue, helps us out, make this flick not suck!!

  108. Milton Waddams, Vogon Fleet Captain... by MsGeek · · Score: 2
    How about Steven Root [imdb.com] as the Vogon Captain? Every see Tripping the Rift [trippingtherift.com]?

    But...but...but...they had me move the planet 4 times already, and they took my stapler...and...and....well, I guess I'm going to have to burn the planet down...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Milton Waddams, Vogon Fleet Captain... by Wee · · Score: 2
      Now Milton, we're going to have you move down to Storage B. Yeah... Get yourself a flashlight and a pry bar and go through all those old file cabinets. We, ah, need to find the work order to destroy Earth. Yeah, we've had some complaints that the paperwork has been too hard to find... Yeah...

      Oh, and Milton? I'm going to need to have you come in on second and third shift too. Yeah... We had to "let go" of some people via the airlock, see, and we kind of have to play catch-up, M'kay?

      Thanks, Milton...

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  109. radio, tv, books; why not film? by fermion · · Score: 1
    HGTTG is a radio show, a book, and a TV show. The radio show is available as audio and script. The TV show is available on video. The books are available everywhere. Each of these HGTTG stories involves Ford, Author, and Zaphod. The Earth gets blow up, and wildness ensues. Beyond that, the specifics are variable.

    Therefore it make no sense to complain that the movie will not match the book, as it is to be expected. HGTTG is not about a specific plot, but a set of characters and ideas. In a way, this makes it harder to adapt, because the ideas do not lend themselves well to the standard Hollywood movie. On the other hand, with the proper support, a wonderful movie is possible.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  110. Casting by SofaMan · · Score: 1

    I don't care what anyone says - the actor playing Arthur Dent must be British. Like Doctor Who, there is a fundamental britishness to the character that is difficult to mimic effectively for anyone non-British (and I say this as an Australian). I think someone else in this thread suggested Alan Cumming, who I think would be a first-class choice. They did the right thing insisting on British actors for Harry Potter, and I think they should do that here too, at least for this character.

    Ford Prefect - David Dixon, who played Ford in the TV series, was spot on - that slight alien-ness to the features. This was actually one of the reasons why the director of the the TV series didn't use Geoffrey McGivern (who played Ford in the radio series) for the role on TV, because McGivern looked "too ordinary". Dixon is too old now, unfortunately. If he or David Bowie were 20 years younger, they'd be a great choice.

    Zaphod Beeblebrox - An American could easily play this role, since the character is so clearly intended to be a caricature of the American psyche anyway - unbelievably brash, loud, whim-driven, egocentric and vulgar. Find an American actor with a good sense of irony and self-deprecation, and you've got a winner. Michael Keaton might be good. - he did play Batman, after all. :)

    I'm of two minds (no pun intended) about the whole 2-heads-3-arms thing; it was originally written as a throwaway line in the radio play, but when it came to TV, the director decided it had to be implemeted, with questionable results. It could probably be done more easily and better now with CG. We kind of expect it now because of the TV series, but I often wonder how much it actually brings to the story.

    And Ian McKellen would be great for Slartibartfast - you'll need a really talented actor to pull off the wonderful weary distractedness that Richard Vernon (may he RIP) played him with.

    And maybe Michael Palin for The Book.

    --

    SofaMan -- Occasionally Battling Evil With His Mighty Powers Of Indolence.

    1. Re:Casting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately Peter Jones (the original book) died a couple of years ago too. I don't think it would be good to have an actor playing the book who didn't sound _a_lot_ like Peter Jones.

    2. Re:Casting by Jayman2 · · Score: 1

      Stephen Fry would be the ultimate Arthur Dent. As british as you'll ever find'em

      --
      -.sig sauer-
  111. To be fair... by Snowgen · · Score: 1

    Apparently they are getting some other script writer to finish off Douglas Adams final installment (I pessimistically wonder how awful this will make it.)

    To be fair... that might make it better! A decade or so ago when I was reading the radio scripts that the books were based on, I discovered that some of the parts I liked best (the entry for the universe for one) weren't written by Doug Adams at all!

    It seems that when he was doing the radio show, the Dr. Who people called him to finish some episodes he had been contracted to do. During that time someone else (whose name escapes me) wrote several of the episodes.

  112. well, along those lines, my take on Tricia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that her name implies Irish, or am I being ridiculous about assuming that about any Mc* name?

    I guess I always pictured (along those lines), someone Irish.

    Of course, I don't get out much so the actresses you suggested might fit this bill, but I have no idea who they are (hiding face in shame)!

    1. Re:well, along those lines, my take on Tricia by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      or am I being ridiculous about assuming that about any Mc* name?
      Mc or Mac implies Scottish it means son of (Ni is daughter of but is only used by Gaelic speakers). The Irish equivalent is O'.

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
  113. Who cares if there's a Hitchhiker movie... by bcwalrus · · Score: 1

    ... This is definitely a S.E.P.

  114. One of my favorite descriptions ever: by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    "The vogon ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't."

    This illustrates why a movie version will never approach the quality of the written one.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  115. Will the Hollywood(TM) movie beat the BBC series? by teqo · · Score: 1
    Well, maybe instead of doing a new movie, they should reshow the original BBC series in cinemas... Everywhere, especially in my city! They were awesome and maybe way more appropriate since they were so british... :) I don't wanna see Hugh Grant as Ford Prefect and Mel Gibson as Arthur Dent, Vogons from ILM??? Alec Guiness would be okay as Slartibartfast, but unfortunately he now lives in the appartment close to Douglas Adams'... How many people here actually know the BBC TV series?

    The only hope is in the idea that the Chicken Run author will be responsible for the script... Will we see Dent and Prefect in clay now?

  116. Re: Keanu Reeves? by JLyle · · Score: 1

    ... if that whole "Superman" thing doesn't pan out ;)

  117. Re:It's been done! - the DVD is out now by malloci · · Score: 1

    click
    Amazon actually has both the vhs and dvd for your viewing pleasure ;)

  118. Re:Who will play Disaster Area? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spinal Tap should play as Disaster Area. Either that or GWAR!!

    Justanother,
    Stoopid Monkey

  119. Re:AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hello, is this your first time on the internet?
    This is AOL Security. We are sorry to report that we have lost your accounting information. Please enter your Credit Card number and AOL password into the box. We apologize again for the inconvenience.

  120. Coinciding with the upcoming Red Dwarf movie? by Hollowine · · Score: 1

    Hmn. Two upcoming movies based upon the two premier British Sci-fi comedies. How interesting. I'm actually looking forward to the Red Dwarf movie as it maintains the same cast and the same creative team (thank god!).

  121. Hollywood Movies by 42 · · Score: 1

    I hope this movie stays true to the original books. Many hollywood movies are all "hollywood" and no entertainment.

  122. No one reads anything anymore... by amosb · · Score: 1

    The script is not a revision of the "final installment", the script is a revision of Douglas's last screenplay attempt. As someone pointed out, he spent virtually his entire adult lifetime trying to get it turned into a movie and finally had a deal that looked like it was going to happen (he had moved to California to be close to the movie production), when fate denied us all.

    Note, of course, that the BBC doesn't read either, as they refer to The Salmon of Doubt as the sixth H2G2 novel. While Douglas had conveyed to his editors that he had decided it made more sense as an H2G2 installment, it began life as the third Dirk Gently novel, and the readable version that they were able to edit together for the book (two thirds of which is just collected writings of his, which are wonderful and superior to the abortive novel at the end) is still clearly a Dirk story.

    To move on from rambling... I fear the movie. Yes, it's comedy, but it's cerebral, and simplifying the humor for the sake of visuals turned out AWFULLY in the TV series (admittedly, they were working with a budget whose scale had been vastly miscalculated for this galaxy). And there's simply no action. Hence, it makes a wonderful radio series, an incredible book (and a second...and a third...), and even a revolutionary (text-based) computer game, but how does looking at it improve anything? Maybe I'm wrong, after all, Douglas wanted to see it made into a movie. But if *he* made it into a movie, it would have tons of new material, be retold to take advantage of the medium, and generally be unshackled by the other versions. There's no way an unrelated screenwriter will get that freedom (and no doubt we'd all scream murder), which means it'll just be a rehash.

    And for that, a much better solution is a trip to the library to check out the cassettes and novels. You know you haven't recently enough.

    1. Re:No one reads anything anymore... by briglass · · Score: 1

      No one reads anything anymore... unless it's on the internet (or slashdot :D ).

      --

      ----
      "Those who quote others are more likely to one day be quoted" -Tom Planter
    2. Re:No one reads anything anymore... by N+Monkey · · Score: 2
      No one reads anything anymore...

      I guess you've never commuted to work on public transport. One day, try taking the train/metro/tube in, for example, London.
  123. There already was a two part movie by epiphani · · Score: 1
    Im amazed people havent mentioned it yet. It took some digging, but you can buy it online
    here.

    Its an excellent, done-in-1981-but-with-a-late-70s-feel movie. Its extremely low budget, but absolutely hilarious.

    --
    .
    1. Re:There already was a two part movie by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      People HAVE mentioned it before... from the very site you link to "This 1981 British movie is comprised of scenes from the serialized TV version of Hitchhiker's Guide."

      So, it's not really a movie but a condensed version of the tv series.

  124. OT:Re:Who will play Arthur Dent? by Chops · · Score: 2

    In the inimitable words of fark, Reno Smash Puny Humans.

  125. Remember The Avengers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope it is not as big a disaster as that was. Americans producing something which is basically British humour?! I think not.

  126. Or cowardly ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously...." ... or cowardly waited his death before corrupting his oeuvre.

  127. Dead don't demand royalties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the bottom line. Someone kicks the bucket and the vultures fly in to eat the rotting corpse and get their wallets fat at the same time.

  128. a movie? by Nept · · Score: 2

    but yea, I mean, it will take for ever for it to come out. I mean think of all that waiting...oh god, I'm so depressed. I'm not getting you down am I? I mean, you think you have problems, what are you supposed to do with a manically depressed robot?

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  129. screenwriter announced for this... by jdbo · · Score: 2

    ...and it's not good news. Let's just say that it doesn't look like they're focusing on talent, here...

  130. I wass so stunned... by atcurtis · · Score: 1



    I was so stunned by this news... my arms fell off.
    Now all I'm worried about is how can I use my digital watch!

    (AFAIK Douglas Adams did court Hollywood to make a film but then became unstuck with the BBC threatening legal action)

    Another opportunity to say that Douglas Adams shall be missed, not only for his novels but for his insight (and occasional vitrolic criticism of Microsoft's products)

    --
    -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
    -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
  131. Just remember this though by Backov · · Score: 1

    When you get to the end of the (3rd?) season just before they get to Earth.. Stop watching it. Run away. Seriously.

    You remember when your friend told you that "when you think AI is over, stop watching"? - this is worse.

    Cheers,
    Backov

    --
    In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
  132. Re:Zaphod - Jon Lovitz by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 2

    I totally thought Zaphod was supposed to be shorter and squat...yeah, that's the ticket. He also has to be really conniving. Lovitz would be perfect. He talks like he has 2 heads already...

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  133. Well i hope they will make it justice. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

    Douglas Adams books is among the most screwed up books ive ever read in my life and i read quite a lot of books. The language and the totally cranked up fantasy of the books makes it pretty hard to make a movie that makes them justice. For us that has read them its almost bound to be ugly since we all have our own picture of how a vogon looks etc.

    LOTR was in my opinion pretty good but it didnt do the books justice. To make good books into a good movie is almost impossible because the different ways the work. A good book can be almost without visual references but you yourself fills the blanks with whatever suits you. A movie serves everything on a dish and can if it dont match your imagination dissapoint very much.

    Hollywood havent been that good at sticking to whatever the book is but rather what the big star and the producer want to see in the movie. I suspect that this movie will be like most other hollywood movies. A frency in effects and not much work on the real script. Its almost like the scripts is worked out around the FX and not the other way.

    Give the script to the same guys that made LOTR and maybe it rocks but hollywood? The same guys that gave us Roxanne?

    Puuleese!

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Well i hope they will make it justice. by ph0rk · · Score: 1

      >>LOTR was in my opinion pretty good but it didnt do the books justice.

      What in the hell are you smoking? Does a movie rendition of LOTR have to follow the book word for word? (Harry Potter did, and look how bad that was).

      Besides, you've only seen one third of LOTR, can't you wait to bash it until after you've seen all three?

      --
      semantics are everything!
    2. Re:Well i hope they will make it justice. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

      Well in my imagination the monsters was soo much better rendered and the elfes was prettier ond so on bla bla bla. Do you see what i meant? You cant transfer peoples imagination to a screen. Books leaves for your own imagination to fill the blanks and thats why what i read can never be put on film. My interpretion of a book doesnt match any others.

      I didnt say the movie was bad in any way i just meant that the books in my opinion was so much better. They are true masterpieces and even a half assed movie out of those books is a movie much better than 99% of every film made.

      LOTR is one of the best movies i ever have seen. The books is much better. But thats just my opinion. Douglas Adams is ahole other story, where do you find anyone in hollywood with humor? Bill and Teds producer?

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
  134. He did mention the planned film in Stockholm.. by tommten · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when he was here promoting the game Starship Titanic (got an autographed copy in my bookshelf, hoping to get it running under wine/winex some day :)
    he mentioned the making of a film, but he wanted things done right.
    He felt that the technology for visual effects had then begin to be more satisfying..
    I remember that he mentioned that he bought back the rights to the film (don't remember from which company). He also mentioned a certian rubberface being proposed to play Zaphod.
    hope to see he finished movie.. been very curious since 1998 :)

    --
    - I choked on the red pill and now I'm stuck in limbo
  135. DNA was working on script... by aitala · · Score: 1

    at the time of his death. But as all DNA fans know, he 'loved to hear the wooshing noise' deadlines make as they go by.

    Hopefully the fellow they got to finish it off is good - he did Chicken Run.... and it should be directed by Jay Roach of the Austin Powers films. Hopefully the will get Hugh Laurie to play Arthur Dent - he was the fellow that played the moronic friend to Blackadder in the BBC series...

    --
    Eric Aitala
    www.f1m.com
  136. douglas adam's final revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    feel free to ejaculate all over this, you mother-fucker fanboy pricks. keep stroking until you reach that perfect point where you can't hold it back. go ahead and suck each other off, if you feel the need. one large homosexual orgy over this. please, proceed! when you reach the point when you can't determine if your drool is composed of saliva or penis ejaculate, then you know you've reached that magical point when it's certain that a dougals adams book is being discussed. and wow, a movie! holy gosh gee whiz! start stroking again! it's your turn to be sucked off by your boyfriend, Faggot.

    douglas adams is dead, for which i am eternally grateful. my only regret is that i didn't kill him myself. i would have done an exquisite job, i would have returned to adams everything he gave to me; agonizing pain and dishonesty. weeks of torture, weeks to months, screams of agony would have been symphonies to be cherished forever in my heart. until that final moment when i would have extinguished his beating heart forever with a single simple savage blow to the head with a large metal object. i shiver ecstatically to think about it.

    it gives me the greatest joy to realize that it is only a matter of time before douglas adams and all his works are forgotten forever, buried beneath the ashes of wasted days and years. after ten-thousand years, there will likely be no record of adams or his thoughts. he will be extinguished completely through the natural ebbs and flows of the universe ruled by entropy, as will all of us. this is complete extinction, when you and all of your thoughts that you left behind like progeny are destroyed completely without possibility for recovery; this is a cause for celebration, perhaps premature but still predetermined. even were a copy of Adam's mindless drivel to survive for fifty-thousand years, the one to read the meaningless satire-driven prose would spend his time in confusion. satire is only effective in the soceity in which was written; it reveals nothing about the human spirit, only about the current human condition and environment, which after time is meaningless. who can divine meaning from socio-political satire years after such socieites and politics are dead? i blame satarists for their incompetence and their parasitic nature; they deserve everything they get. they contribute nothing to the greater work of humanity. douglas adam's deserved death by long months of torture; his works deserve to be annihilated by the forces of the universe. true, this is the fate of us all, but i delight and take ecstatic joy in the present that adam's works will be erased from existance in the future.

    1. Re:douglas adam's final revenge by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never read Candide? Satire does exist far beyond socio-political climate in which it was created, *if it's good enough*.

      My guess is that 100 years from now, Hitchhiker's will be required reading in some College level courses.

      But my guess is that you've never read either book I've cited here, as, judging by the drivel you spouted, I doubt you're literate beyond the Junior-High-School level.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  137. Slartibartfast by BluBrick · · Score: 2
    The other Great Exception was Slartibartfast, not sure what the actor's name was, but he truly grokked the character.


    Of course you don't remember his name - he told you it didn't matter!
    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  138. A Salmon of Doubt ended up as a Dirk Gently Novel! by ZaPhOd42 · · Score: 1
    There's a minor error in the BBC News article here:

    "A Salmon of Doubt was the sixth episode of the Hitchhiker series."

    Erm, no it wasn't!

    A Salmon of Doubt started out as a Hitch Hikers novel but Adams decided that the concepts involved were better suited to a Dirk Gently story.

    The published version (although apparently there were many other revisions) of A Salmon of Doubt is actually half a Dirk Gently story.

    Z.

  139. Infinite Improbability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a coincidence I just started reading the books about a week ago!

  140. Belgium, man! by SKicker · · Score: 2

    not another good book ruined by hollywood. Books like this will not benefit from this:

    (Fat man in suit sits at a desk. Looks at his digital watch at the time. Opens up his expensive PDA, trys to turn it on, gives up and uses a pen and paper. In barely legible writing he lays down)

    - spend money on fight scenes
    - spend money on special effects
    - spend money on big name actors
    - spend money on advertising

    'ok that looks like it.. hmmm cant help thinking i've forgot something.. oh yes.'

    - write a script

    Hmm 'Terry!?' (tea boy look up from linking paperclips together) 'Got a little job for you, shouldnt take you more than half a day'

    ----

    Hes not being 'taken seriously after his death' as you say, but since hes dead they dont have to take him seriously anymore since the people that will give them the rights will be lawyers who you can appease with money rather than a good film. The radio version of HHGG was great, thats because Adams wrote the script.

    We cant even hope for an amazing tea boy since the script would then be vetoed. Oh God I'm so depressed.

  141. The End. by beofli · · Score: 1

    The premiere will be held in the Restaurant at the end of the Universe.

  142. quoth Jay Sherman: by jx100 · · Score: 1

    "It Stinks!"

  143. size no longer matters by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 1

    Look at the hobbits in LoTR, the actors real size no longer matters when it comes to casting a movie, to bad they didn't have it figured out in time for TPM Anakin and Padme...

  144. Relocated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt the opening scenes will be set in New York or Beverley Hills...

    Life? Don't talk to me about life...

  145. ???? WHAAA ???? by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 1

    "At best, it is a mildly funny fantasy story..." Am I the only person who laughed so hard the first time I read it that I had to clear my eyes and start breathing again so I could continue on? It's a journey, the "climax" of these stories are generally unimportant (yes the answer to ...Everything is unimportant!), it is the story that is relevant, that's why a cliff's notes would be useless. With time jokes about digital watches loose their luster but the commentary on man's struggle with time and mortality is timeless, the satire is needed to stomach it. I just wish that everyone got everything out of these books that I did, it was well worth the time.

    1. Re:???? WHAAA ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Am I the only person who laughed so hard the
      > first time I read it that I had to clear my eyes > and start breathing again so I could continue on?

      By no means - puerile and silly sense of humor is germane to many.

  146. The Radio Series... by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2

    was better than the books. Well from my point of view. After hearing the radio series the books seem boring. I didn't hear the entire series only to the old man in the hut episode -- the real ruler of the galaxy. The radio series had humour and a flow that was just missing from the books. The TV series was OK but only covered a small portion of the story.

    For example, remember the scene where Arthur Dent hears Marvin humming ... except its "Wish You Were Here" and comments in amazement about him humming Pink Floyd ? Just doesn't transfer well to a book in my opinion. Actually I wish they did it as a mini-series so they could get the whole story. Get the guys who did Third Rock From the Sun to do it ... that has a HGTTG feel about it.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
    1. Re:The Radio Series... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 2

      I lestened to the radio series back before there was a novelisation of a TV version. It was groundbreaking in that it actually used the medium to its limits.

      DNA's plots were often a case of him figuratively painting the story into a corner, an pulling a solution out at the last second. I highly recommend the radio scripts for more juicy tidbits.

      Here's hoping that H2G2: The Motion Picture is truthful to the original vision. Hells, if they can get Stephen Moore to speak the part of Marvin, I would be one swotting happy frood.

  147. Stephen King dead? Try again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe now the same thing will happen to Stephen King. You know, now that he's dead and all ...

    Ummm, yeah, ok.

    So we can expect to see Stephen King the Corpse at the New Yorker Festival then?

  148. Pink Panther by bjb · · Score: 1
    Well, I hope that if they are going to "fill in the gaps" as it were, that it doesn't become victim of the same fate as the last Pink Panther movie. The idea is that Peter Sellers died during the filming of the second-to-last Pink Panther movie, and they filled in the gap by totally convoluting the story. Awful. I won't even mention the sequel which was horrendous.

    Of course, Peter wasn't the author of the story, but the idea is that when someone else tries to fill in a missing piece of a story, it can have some horrible consequences. Let us hope this doesn't happen here.

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  149. why they waited by Adler · · Score: 1
    this is hollywood we're talking about, rmember? They often take interest much more in something after the creator dies. why? fat sacks of cash money. they usually can get away with paying less than what the creator asked, they don't care about making it good, just making it profitable. it's america 101.

    there was an article, i think i saw it on fark about a guy who plays huge pranks all the time, and a movie sutdio waned to make his life into a movie, but refused to pay what he wanted. Then he faked his own death complete with funeral, then the movie studio started calling again, thinking he was dead, offereing even less than what they had before for the movie rights to his story. it's all about money people. Douglas and HGTTG is just more money to be made, like Jim Carey and the grinch, another fond childhood memory ruined.

    at $8 american a pop of course.

    --

    Everybody denies I am a genius--but nobody ever called me one!

  150. Re:Greg's Previews has had info on this for two ye by gorilla · · Score: 2

    This is obviously a hoax. The real Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal would eat all of the assoicate producers.

  151. A.D. by Winterblink · · Score: 1
    "It seems a shame that Hollywood had to wait until his death before they took him seriously...."

    This happens a lot in the entertainment industry as a whole.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  152. Cool. by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

    Great idea, aside from the thorny legal issues, but who cares about those. :) If I had modpoints you'd be snacking on 'em now.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  153. Bring A Towel by Ranger · · Score: 1

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: The Motion Picture could be so bad that you'll need to wrap a towel around your head to avoid having your eyes and ears bleed. Or drink a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster before the opening credits.

    I've heard it will open with a reading of Vogon poetry. Since they can't find any Vogons they'll use a movie studio executive instead. I realize this isn't being nice to the Vogons, but who wants to be?

    And finally did anyone have the foresight install a tachometer on Douglas' headstone so we can see how fast he's spinning in his grave when H2G2:TMP is released?

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  154. wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First we get lotr, now Hitchhiker's coming...

    I wonder how long before we see Asimov's Foundation?

  155. Strange experience watching the HHGG DVD by nicestepauthor · · Score: 1

    I just bought the DVD of the TV show, and I had seen it when it was originally broadcast and liked it well enough to buy the VHS tapes. In any case, a couple of weeks ago I went to see a live performance of the musical "Carousel" with my wife. Not the kind of thing I did before I got married! However, when I was watching HHGG a few days later I noticed a new gag I never "got" before.

    When the Heart Of Gold is being attacked by the missiles from Magrothea and everyone thinks they're going to die, Mike the computer starts singing:

    "When you walk through a storm keep your head up high..."

    Yeah, "You'll never walk alone" from Carousel. I had to play it back a couple of times before I believed it.

  156. Been in the pipe for years... by IanHill · · Score: 1

    We all know this has been in the pipeline for *years*, but as DNA says in The Salmon Of Doubt(well its quoted in The Salmon of Doubt - he said it somewhere else first):

    "The holywood process is like grilling a steak by having a succession of people coming into the room and breathing on it."

  157. Re:Zaphod - Jon Lovitz by Zerelli · · Score: 0

    Only Jon Lovitz would suggest this. You must have missed the actual story. That is possibly the worst possible suggestion for the part, with the exception perhaps of ...crap whats his name the guy from My Cousin Vinny.....or maybe Danny DeVito anyhow, go back and read up on Zaphod he is the guy who gets the chick, he is a star. He is not short, or squat.

  158. Claymation by a1englishman · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should drop the idea of a live action HHG movie, and set Nick Park on the project of a claymation HHG movie.

    Nick Park is the genious animator behind "The Wrong Trousers", and other Wallace and Gromit films.

    I love the HH series, from the radio drama to the novels and the horrible TV series. Mostly Harmess was a bad way to end it, and Mr. Adams more or less admits to it in Salom of a Doubt. There were a lot of very good writings in that book, including the biscuits at the railway station, and the draft of Salom. I had meant to write both his wife and his publisher a letter of thanks for sharing the last scraps of genious from such a wonderfully tallented man.

  159. Re:BBC TV Movie already exsists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either BBC or Channel 4 made a TV Movie about 12 years ago. It covers almost through "So long and thanks for all the fish." I am sure that a Hollywood movie would be much better, but I love the "Doctor Who" production quality of the BBC.

  160. Claymation or CG is the only way to go. by MadGrizzle · · Score: 1

    The movie will flop if they try to do it as a live action flick. Maybe get those actors to do the voices, fine, but visually it needs to be done in 'Claymation' style (ala Chicken Run) or full CG (ala Shrek).

  161. Supposedly performed on DA's funeral (I wept): by Jens · · Score: 2

    [If you can't recognize the tune, you're in the wrong generation. Run along and play until the grownups are done.]

    When I find myself in times of trouble,
    Douglas Adams comes in view
    Speaking words of wisdom: "Forty-two."
    And in my hour of darkness,
    He is the light that shines on through
    Speaking words of wisdom: "Forty-two."

    Forty-two, forty-two, forty-two, forty-two.
    Whisper words of wisdom: forty-two.

    What are the broken-hearted people
    Living in the world to do?
    There will be an answer: Forty-two.
    For though they may be parted,
    There is still a chance to see what's true.
    There will be an answer: forty-two.

    Forty-two, forty-two, forty-two, forty-two.
    There will be an answer: forty-two.

    [Cue the choir and repeat ad infinitum.]

  162. They hung in the air by ACNeal · · Score: 1

    Exactly like bricks don't.

    How are you going to put that quirky wit in a movie without a lot of narration. And if you have enough narration to do Douglas Adams' wit justice, you can't hope to have an entertaining movie. Maybe a book on tape.

    Let's face it. The little insites into the world around the characters is almost all of what makes the books worth reading. The story is slightly interesting, yes, but how long did it take you to figure out what was slightly unpleasant about being drunk.

  163. How about Stephen Hawking as Marvin by bcemoli · · Score: 1

    He's already got a brain the size of a planet, and a synthesized voice.

  164. -pedantic by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

    ...I would be one swotting happy frood.

    It's "swutting," man... Belgium.

    -If

    --
    Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  165. As long as he's not the producer! by ArthurDent · · Score: 2

    His only non-MP producing credit is the classic Time Bandits! :)

  166. Zaphod Beetlebrox == Richard E. Grant by csmiller · · Score: 1

    Ok, apart from the obvious link to 'How to get ahead in advertising' I'd say he'd be excelent. Although a bit old (according to IMDB he's 55, he's played the cock-sure, dashing Scarlet Pimpernel.

    --
    It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --- Albert Einstein
  167. Howard as Zaphod by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

    I think Howard Stern is the rockstar comedian that I couldn't place. I think he would be a good over-the-top Zaphod B. - better than Brad Pitt. Brad is a good nutball, but Zaphod's not a nutball, he's just a boozing, womanizing, charismatic bastard... Stern is perfect.

    -If

    --
    Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    1. Re:Howard as Zaphod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Howard Stern is a fucking retard.

      And that stupid beach show - the previews remind me of writing done by a 7th grade pubescent boy.

    2. Re:Howard as Zaphod by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah, Stern IS hateable in so many ways... the same ways that Zaphod is such a bastard.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    3. Re:Howard as Zaphod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference being that Zaphod is a fictional character and Howard is a real person with the mental maturity of a retarded amoeba.

    4. Re:Howard as Zaphod by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      You've utterly convinced me! He's the best real, living person to enact the role of this fictional character!

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  168. Marvin: Charles Grodin by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

    Have you ever seen anyone as whiny, morose, aloof, and sarcastic as Charles Grodin?

    I can't even picture how they would make Marvin look... He was a plastic joke in the TV series, but I guess that's kind of what you would expect from the Marketing Division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation. "Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!" So he needs to be depressingly goofy and "user-friendly," yet futuristic.

    -If

    --
    Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  169. Zaphod != Matthew Lillard by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

    Please, do not put Matthew Lillard anywhere near this movie. What, were you impressed with his performance in Hackers? Next you'll want Jennifer Love Hewitt as Trillian, Jamie Kennedy as Ford Prefect, and Freddie Prinze, Jr. as Arthur Dent. That's just wrong and bad.

    -If

    Sorry if that came of combatative, I just really dislike the whole Matthew Lillard/Scream/I Know What You Did Last Summer/Teeny-Bopper Get Laid Movie crowd of actors.

    --
    Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    1. Re:Zaphod != Matthew Lillard by schon · · Score: 2

      Sorry if that came of combatative, I just really dislike the whole Matthew Lillard/Scream/I Know What You Did Last Summer/Teeny-Bopper Get Laid Movie crowd of actors

      No problem, I can relate..

      I just think that he's not quite as bad as the others... (Jennifer Love Hewitt has nice boobs though .. It's fun to watch her music videos with the sound off :o)

  170. But... by JonnyElvis42 · · Score: 1

    Will they ever be able to match the special effects used to generate Zaphod's second head on the BBC?

  171. It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curling tongs and the color of square wheels.
    Will they get it right ?

  172. Zaphod... Mike's Hard Lemonade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy in the Mike's Hard Lemonade commercial already has two heads...

    A perfect match.

  173. 'itch'ikers ? by MaximusPrime · · Score: 1


    Hitchikers Guide To Be Made Into A Movie

    Isn't it supposed to be Hitch h ikers ?

    Or is this a 'enry 'iggins kinda thing ?

  174. Oops... extra arm and head by TekPolitik · · Score: 2

    Damnit. "extra arm and head", not "extra arm and leg".

  175. very important by snoozebutton · · Score: 1

    I think we underestimate how important it is to keep his memory, and moreso, his "humour ethic" in mind as we face daily life..
    I should have a HHG desktop wallpaper up soon here.