Slashdot Mirror


Michelin to Include RFID Transmitter in Every Tire

An anonymous reader writes "According to the RFID Journal, Michelin (the tire manufacturer) has announced that it is planning on embedding RFID transmitters into every tire. The article states that 'the microchip stores the tire's unique ID, which can be associated with the vehicle identification number.' Let the privacy invasion begin!" If they're going to embed electronics in tires, I wish they'd start with tiny pressure gauges. (See also this story from a few days ago about the coming surge in RFID tags.)

577 comments

  1. Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a friend with the same car, and swap boots.

    (first post?)

  2. time to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stock up on retreads from south of the border

  3. what does this have to do with my rights online? by Matthew+Luckie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    new technology

  4. Re:what does this have to do with my rights online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If they link the purchaser to the tire via credit card number, they can know who you online and track you anywhere in the real world with RFID readers. In other words, someone from slashdot can steal your car.

  5. Re:what does this have to do with my rights online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good question...but is YRO interpreted as:

    1. category all about your "online rights"

    2. category about ALL your rights...just happens that the forum is online

  6. Re:what does this have to do with my rights online by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    No, sorry you have lost me.

  7. who ordered this? by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    funny, as a consumer who actually buys the tires, I don't remember ever asking for this.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:who ordered this? by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      funny, as a consumer who actually buys the tires, I don't remember ever asking for this

      Amen! Mod parent up!

    2. Re:who ordered this? by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      I ordered this.

      I want my garage door, my mp3 player, and my whirlpool to know when I pull around the corner.

      Perhaps more importantly, I want my infared gun turrent to start tracking my pursuers if I come speeding in...

    3. Re:who ordered this? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      I ordered this.

      I want my garage door, my mp3 player, and my whirlpool to know when I pull around the corner.

      Perhaps more importantly, I want...

      Plenty of ways to do this without having to install an identifier in your tire that can be read by anyone wherever your car goes.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    4. Re:who ordered this? by leonardluen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why bother getting some stupid transmitter and looking at your damn tires when i can just read the license plate?

    5. Re:who ordered this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bored housewives need it to warn them that hubby is comming home early from work.

    6. Re:who ordered this? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      why bother getting some stupid transmitter and looking at your damn tires when i can just read the license plate?

      Because it's much simpler to embed a sensor in the road and track everyone who drives by it than it is to accurtely aim several cameras and read all license plates (and try to optically recognize all the numbers accurately) in all weather conditions in all light conditions (day and night), particularly when several cars might drive past the area at the same time.

      If your post is intended to suggest that there would be easier ways for big brother to track everyone and greatly invade your privacy, then you'll need to come up with something better than "just read the license plate". To me it looks like the new world order has come up with something better, and is busy putting it in place.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    7. Re:who ordered this? by Zirnike · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Of course you didn't. However, you are not the consumer. After all, in the course of a lifetime, how many Michelin tires would you buy? Tops, a couple hundred? (2 cars*4 tires*25 years of various cars). How many does Ford buy (here 'Ford' is used because it's the shortest car manufacturer's name) (typing that negated any benefit, didn't it?)? Couple million a month?

      You're not the real target market, Ford is.

      That being said, I'm not positive what Ford is getting out of it...

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    8. Re:who ordered this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Documentation that no Michelin's detonated when placed onto a Ford Explorer, thus ensuring it was Firestone's fault?

    9. Re:who ordered this? by shepd · · Score: 2, Funny

      >(here 'Ford' is used because it's the shortest car manufacturer's name) (typing that negated any benefit, didn't it?)?

      GM? AMC? Fiat? Lada?

      Oh, wait, I have the winner: Kia! ;-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:who ordered this? by barryp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you wanted to track cars, It'd be even easier to just put the RFID chip in the license plate itself - which you are not allowed to swap freely like you can do with tires.

    11. Re:who ordered this? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      funny, as a consumer who actually buys the tires, I don't remember ever asking for this

      I guess you didn't ask for barcodes either? But everyone benefits when the cost of transacting and tracking is minimized.

    12. Re:who ordered this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Kia is just the crappiest. Tied with Hyundai in the "I'd rather have a used Dodge than a new one of those, and I haven't seen a dodge I liked in 25 years" category.

      "Kia: When you think you're too good for public transportation, but haven't worked up enough self esteem for an actual vehicle."

    13. Re:who ordered this? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Kia is the crappiest from that list, eh?

      You obviously haven't enjoyed quality Soviet Russia Lada brand engineering, have you? ;-)

      Now there's the pinnacle in disposable cars!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:who ordered this? by The+Madpostal+Worker · · Score: 1

      A lot of companies (truck companies, bus companies and the like) rent their tires from the tire company. They pay them a penny per mile driven on the tire. Now someone has to keep track of which tires are on the bus or truck, where they are, how many miles have been driven on them. This is a lot of work. Even if you're a small bus company with 30 transit busses you still have over 180 tires on the vehicles at one time. Think of trying to keep track of them.

      These devices could greatly simplify the paperwork of knowing what tire is where for how long.

      --

      /*
      *Not a Sermon, Just a Thought
      */
  8. Don't Fuck with Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they can put those things in tires, they can
    put them in condoms, too.

    1. Re:Don't Fuck with Homeland Security by twitter · · Score: 1
      If they can put those things in tires, they can
      put them in condoms, too.

      You would think the used item would be more identifying than the one on the counter.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    2. Re:Don't Fuck with Homeland Security by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      If they can put those things in tires, they can put them in condoms, too.

      Yeah, but think of the reader they would use to scan it.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    3. Re:Don't Fuck with Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if that would be a steel belted condom?

      Generic condoms are for cheap fuckers.

  9. Overheard in a tire store near you by crstophr · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Sir, I just don't understand how you could have recieved puncture damage in the exact same spot on all 4 tires."

    or,

    "Why does the rubber on this tire appear melted?"

    Brings new meaning to the phrase burning rubber....

    1. Re:Overheard in a tire store near you by spongman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if it's easy to disable these things by using a strong magnetic or electric field. Anyone know?

    2. Re:Overheard in a tire store near you by row314 · · Score: 1
      I wonder if it's easy to disable these things by using a strong magnetic or electric field. Anyone know?

      Or perhaps ultrasound? Or an optical fiber connected to a laser? Some of the surgical tech used for destroying stones, plaques, clots, etc. inside the body could probably be adapted at a reasonable cost. For one thing, you wouldn't have to worry as much about harming the surrounding "tissue". Like as not the most you'd have to do would be to take the tire off the rim long enough to zap the tag, assuming it was mounted on the inside of the tire.

      One other thought--what happens if you put some metalic chaff around a tag? (Maybe even a tiny little RFID aluminum foil hat....)

    3. Re:Overheard in a tire store near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it possible to change the number these tags put out?

    4. Re:Overheard in a tire store near you by ces · · Score: 1

      Mmmm ... Tesla coil.

      Actually any reasonably high-powered RF transmitter at the right frequencies should cause a RFID tag to short itself out.

      This was mentioned in the article a couple of days ago.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  10. New slogan announced by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You now have a lot more riding on your tires, so don't do anything stupid 'cause we're watchin' your ass, bitch."

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:New slogan announced by unicron · · Score: 1

      I find this entire thing quite like the anthrax slogan "Only important people get anthrax, so you have nothing to worry about."

      I laugh myself horse reading all the replies on here from boring middle class school kids that are worried shitless about their privacy. I promise you the government hasn't, doesn't, and won't ever give 2 shits about ANYTHING you do. I forget the exact quote, but I'm reminded of Scully's summation of the "Lone Gunmen" the first time she met them. Something to the effect of "these people believe these stories because they want to feel special, they want to believe the government actually has some interest in what they're doing, when in reality, the government couldn't care less."

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:New slogan announced by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I laugh myself horse reading all the replies on here from boring middle class school kids that are worried shitless about their privacy. I promise you the government hasn't, doesn't, and won't ever give 2 shits about ANYTHING you do.

      After 9/11 and the Littleton high school massacre I'm not so sure that's necessarily true.

      they want to believe the government actually has some interest in what they're doing, when in reality, the government couldn't care less."

      The government doesn't care what you do as an individual. But when your travels and behavior can be tracked and compared to "the norm" in real time, the computer doing the comparing will be happy to raise the red flag on you.

      That and no-one cares what you do now, but if RFIDs allow a way to keep track of you, will the FBI make an effort to AVOID using that information? Will local law enforcement not press for the ability to have their automated system run through the data and see if anyone has exceeded 70mph within city limits?

      It's not that anyone cares or wants to use it for these things now. It's the data mining capability that could exist in the future that is scary. "Information wants to be free, and data wants to be mined." :)

    3. Re:New slogan announced by hawkestein · · Score: 4, Informative

      True, the government doesn't really care about you (unless you happen to be from certain unpopoular countries these days). Companies, on the other hand, would love to know all about you so that they can target your particular interests for all sorts of products they'd like to sell you. They're the ones you really have to worry about when it comes to privacy issues, because they really *do* care about your personal info.

      --
      -- Will quantum computers run imaginary-time operating systems?
    4. Re:New slogan announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After 9/11 and the Littleton high school massacre I'm not so sure that's necessarily true.

      So are you implying that the government would be motivated to gather information to PREVENT MASS MURDERS!?!?! OMG, WE MUST PROTEST THIS INSANITY!!

      on the other hand, I am all for it if this helps them catch those FUCKING ASSHOLE TRUCKERS who run on shitty tires that blow out and leave GIGANTIC FUCKING CHUNKS OF RUBBER in the middle of the highway for me to slalom at 70 MPH.

    5. Re:New slogan announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ..."for me to slalom at 70 MPH"
      Are you all for it if it helps em catch speeders?
    6. Re:New slogan announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those chunks are b.c those tires are generally retreads due to cost...

    7. Re:New slogan announced by Kombat · · Score: 1
      So what? So companies want to track my interests so they can target advertising at me. So? Big deal. I say GOOD! I'm tired of getting coupons for panty shields and fliers for a new daycare opening down the street. But if Best Buy is having a sale on digital cameras, I'd like to hear about that.

      Why is everyone so uptight about companies fine-tuning targeted advertising? Why can't people see the benefits of this? Maybe the local butcher can't afford to send a bulk mailing to the whole neighborhood, but if they could exclude mailings to all known vegetarians and folks of particular religions, then maybe they could afford to send the ads to the remaining few hundred. Why is this a bad thing? People are more informed of options that are relevant to their interests, companies can save money and increase profits (which, I suppose, is bad, unless like 90% of you reading this, you WORK for a company), everybody wins!

      What's the problem here?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    8. Re:New slogan announced by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      News flash - boring middle class school kids sometimes rise beyond their mediocrity and become political leaders. More importantly, they sometimes become OPPOSITION leaders. I'm nobody special and likely never will be. I recognize, however, that there are people out there not too different from me who are doing things that benefit me and annoy powerful people.

      It is politically untenable to track opposition leaders. It is quite possible, however, to get the populace to accept that EVERYONE will be tracked for their own good (protection from communists, drug dealers, terrorists, etc - depending on the decade).

      Once that becomes acceptable, you are quite right that 99.999% of the information will be thrown away. It's the .001% of the population that agitates against current government policies that have to be worried. People like this generally agitate against the rights of the rich and powerful and for the rights of the ordinary Joe. Knocking them down a few notches is in the interests of the existing leadership and is not in the interests of the general public.

      Then there's the issue with databases in general - sure, the government doesn't care much about it, though they want the information around in case they find someone they want to harass. There are thousands of scrupleless private investigators who would LOVE to get their hands on that info, and thousands of scrupleless hackers who would help them. Relevant to this story, if John Doe suspected infidelity on the part of the spouse who was divorcing him, don't you think a log of all the places his wife had driven would be interesting to him?

      Privacy means two things...freedom from government harassment and freedom from private harassment. Let the government monitor everyone, and they'll harass the people who make the government uncomfortable. You can't protect only the activists; you have to protect everyone. Let the government maintain databases on everyone and that information becomes available to everyone willing to pay, whether it's criminal to hack the database or not.

      You place entirely too much trust in the scruples of demonstrably unscrupulous categories of people.

    9. Re:New slogan announced by ces · · Score: 1

      Don't know what liberal nanny state you live in buddy but around these parts 70 is a perfectly legal highway speed. Hell I'm even told some freedom loving states have a speed limit of 75 or even no speed limit at all.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    10. Re:New slogan announced by ces · · Score: 1

      You make some good points, however the government doesn't need to find all the activists and sympathisers, they just need to discourage most people from getting involved and discredit the few who remain.

      Don't believe me, ask anyone who worked with CISPES in the late 80's especially anyone who was in their Los Angeles office.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    11. Re:New slogan announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll. You know perfectly well the right to commit mass murders with automatic weapons was envisioned by the founding fathers and enshrined in the second amendment.

    12. Re:New slogan announced by morleron · · Score: 1

      This is the sort of thing that concerns me. IIRC at least one of the recent articles about RFID devices indicated that they will soon be, or already are, capable of transmitting information about their location. You know that the next step will be for the government to start embedding these goodies in things like your driver's and vehicle licenses. Combine these with the fast approaching ubiquity of "public area" security cameras and you can kiss any idea of public "privacy" goodbye. Privacy in general won't be far behind if people like AG John Ashcroft have their way.

      It seems to me that those who are concerned about the effect that RFID devices may have on civil liberties need to get ahead of the curve on this issue and start those petitions and protests now. Bear in mind that the DMCA will prevent us from legally reverse engineering the devices in order to develop countermeasures. Also, I'm sure that some aspect of the PATRIOT ACT will be construed to prohibit disabling any government issued RFIDs. It's looking more and more like Orwell was right, he just misjudged the rate of technology growth.

      Just my $.02,
      Ron

      --
      Impeach Barack Obama for violating the Constitutional requirement to be a "natural born" citizen to hold the office of P
    13. Re:New slogan announced by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Well it just so happens that I have an offer for you!

      You don't settle for an average car, an average house, an average job, or an average wife. So why do you settle for an averaged size penis?

      With longitude, your partner will watch in awe as your member grows and grows with seemingly no boundaries. In just six weeks, some customers acheive a blazing two and a half inch increase.

      P.S. This is just a joke. Don't take it personally ;)

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  11. Just curious... by _RidG_ · · Score: 1

    I'm just curious...how are the planning on justifying this? The article has already been /.'ed, so if anyone read it, please do explain. I, for one, can't imagine any benefit that would justify Michelin implanting essentially a tracking device in my car tires.

    --


    "The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it." - G.B. Shaw
    1. Re:Just curious... by sik+puppy · · Score: 1


      google cache:

      http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:Xl5flbqI4dY J: www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/269/1/1/+r fid+michelin&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
    2. Re:Just curious... by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Warranty purposes. So you can't pass off your old tires as new ones. Not like they pro-rate them until they're worthless anyways.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    3. Re:Just curious... by r00zky · · Score: 1

      the benefit of this??...
      Michelin hopes manufacturers will pay a little more for tires with RFID transponders, because it makes the tires easier to track.
      ...all for Michelin, which increases the prices of these tires for an useless feature, because why would you want to track tires? They're supposed to stay with the car all the time aren't they?
      Even more, as someone pointed the max range of that transmitters is 24 inches, so they're not even a tracking device, at that distance anyone can identify you from your vehicle's id plate.

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
    4. Re:Just curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They're supposed to stay with the car all the time aren't they?

      Oh, not necessarily. I've got >=2 sets of wheels for each of my cars (street/snows, street/snows/competition), and if I get around to doing a 5-lug conversion on my "toy" car, I'll have complete interchangeability between it and my daily driver. Best tires for the job of the moment on either car, at that point. ;-)

  12. Next thing you know by glrotate · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll make you put an identification tag on your bumper

    1. Re:Next thing you know by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      RFID is a bit different. They are planning on including them in clothes and all other sorts of items.

    2. Re:Next thing you know by antarctic · · Score: 1

      that is seriously the most intelligent comment on this subject yet. everybody here is a paranoid freak. right on

    3. Re:Next thing you know by feceus · · Score: 1

      Or, *gasp* they'll start putting "license" plates on the front and back of each car!

      Seriously though, if you're close enough for the tag to be read ( 3 to 5 meters, according to the article ), you would be able to read the plate numbers just fine.

    4. Re:Next thing you know by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or on a metal plate visible through the front windshield of every car produced.

      MS is also trying to track my movements; I found a SERIAL NUMBER stamped on the bottom of my xbox. Those bastards never stop infringing my rights.

    5. Re:Next thing you know by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      ... That way you'll get an automatic email when you forget to change your clothes 3 days in a row. :)

    6. Re:Next thing you know by rnelsonee · · Score: 1
      Thank you. Although it is funny, it also points out that not everything is intended with Homeland Security in mind. Using RFID tags to track consumers? Who the fuck thinks that? All I know from RFID tags I learned from /., and I'm still educated enough to know that:
      • To track RFID tags in tires, The Man needs to install the readers.
      • ...at a lot of locations to make it easier for The Man to get a good idea of where you're going (I'd say a few hundred thousand... as a start)
      • ...and they all have to be networked to a giant database

      Then it's possible for The Man to track everyone. But what the hell for!? Assuming this even passes as legal... but look, the government can already track suspects once they get a warrant, we know that. As for tracking people for patterns (to later be named suspects), they're not going to get any good dirt on finding out where you buy your loafers.

    7. Re:Next thing you know by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Scary! Uh, not that I ever do that... ;)

  13. tiny pressure guages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my corvette has pressure guages in the wheels, uses an RF transmitter to the dash. I suspect this feature will become a lot more common after the explorer roller fiasco.

    1. Re:tiny pressure guages by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

      It has the sensors because Corvettes (except the Z06) have run-flat tires, which don't deflate or give you any indication of losing air, so you need the gauge to tell you if you if you've got a flat. (You're only supposed to go 55 mi. @ 55 mph or whatever on them.)

  14. The Law, and they do! by agentZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    The tire makers are just trying to comply with the law! The TREAD (Transportation, Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation) Act requires tire makers to track all of their tires in case they need to recall them. Blame Congress, not the tire makers.

    Oh, and to respond to the editors comment about how they should make tired that track tire pressure instead, they already do! (Is it okay for me to tell the editor to RTFA?

    1. Re:The Law, and they do! by Fazlazen · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The TREAD (Transportation, Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation) Act requires tire makers to track all of their tires in case they need to recall them. Blame Congress, not the tire makers.
      Personally, I would like it if I went into my car dealership (Jiffy Lube, whatever), and when they scanned my tires they said "Hey, these have been recalled". With all the recalls that are out in the market today, there is no central authority (that I could find with a quick Google, anyhow) that shows all the recalls. Even if there is, I doubt that most people are bothered enough to check every day for things that could be affecting their lives.

      The Ford Explorer tragedies were horrible. My friend's cousin was the fourth documented case in the state of Florida. If implementing technology like this can save one life, I say go for it!

    2. Re:The Law, and they do! by SheldonYoung · · Score: 1

      How is an RFID tag more useful than just printing a serial number on the outside of the tire?

    3. Re:The Law, and they do! by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Blame Congress, not the tire makers.

      Oh don't worry, we already are. If there's an invasion of privacy going on, Congress is somehow involved.

      Oh, and Hillary Rosen.

    4. Re:The Law, and they do! by agentZ · · Score: 1

      For the same reason why there is a bar code on every product you buy at the grocery store. So the clerk/salesman doesn't have to type in every value they see (and possibly get the digits wrong).

    5. Re:The Law, and they do! by khuber · · Score: 1
      If implementing technology like this can save one life, I say go for it!

      I don't think there's a significant risk of something like that happening. I think there's a big risk of RFIDs used to surreptitiously invade my privacy. I don't want my personal possessions "tracked" for any reason whatsoever, period, end of story.

      -Kevin

    6. Re:The Law, and they do! by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      A barcode on the tire would also do just fine. You can't track a barcode with radio waves like you can with RFID.

    7. Re:The Law, and they do! by buysse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If implementing technology like this can save one life, I say go for it!
      Goddamn, but I really hope this is sarcasm.
      --
      -30-
    8. Re:The Law, and they do! by namespan · · Score: 1

      Your point is well-taken -- it'd be nice to get product information based on easily machine-readable information. Something like the cue cat could have done this. The question isn't whether or not having quick access to information about a product is useful. The question is: will this be used to track the consumer/vehicle user, or the tire?

      My bet is: more likely the former more than the later. At best: both.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    9. Re:The Law, and they do! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Your dealer typically mails you these things.

      My dealer has a website that i can log into and recalls will also posted there.

    10. Re:The Law, and they do! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, but by putting presure onto the comapny, by NOT buying there tires, they will presure congress to stop this stupid law. This is a way to get someone with lobbiest to go at congress.

      why aren't identification numbers enough?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:The Law, and they do! by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

      What if you buy your car used?

    12. Re:The Law, and they do! by Bishop · · Score: 1

      It is cheaper to put an RFID tag in the tire. A serial number would have to be unique (obviously) and not wear off. This is harder to manufacture.

    13. Re:The Law, and they do! by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      The Ford Explorer tragedies were horrible. My friend's cousin was the fourth documented case in the state of Florida. If implementing technology like this can save one life, I say go for it!
      The Explorer tragedies were horrible. However, as someone who's had tires blow out at 70MPH, I can tell you that there is only one place for the blame: The driver.

      Air the damn tires up, and check them. Even the best-built tire will blow when overloaded and underinflated.

      Sorry, but this "Blame the manufacturers!" shit pisses me off. You pile the whole family in the car and don't bother to check the tires, you gets what you deserve.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    14. Re:The Law, and they do! by leonardluen · · Score: 1, Redundant

      why would a care about some stupid rfid i have to get close to your tire to read?

      why not just read your license plate?

      -1 redundant

    15. Re:The Law, and they do! by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

      A lot of tires do have barcodes. You know why you don't see them? They wear away really quickly, even on the sidewall. Brushing up against curbs, rain, gravel all wear away on the tire. This is a big problem when it comes to barcodes, because they are measured by the thickness of the lines, a little wears off the edge of one of the lines...Oops! It's now a different number.

    16. Re:The Law, and they do! by L0rdJedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone didn't look hard enough. A quick google search on "vehicle recall" gets me a link to the NHTSA. That's right, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Oh, and look here, a Recall button where you can enter your vehicle information and see if there are any recalls.

    17. Re:The Law, and they do! by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1

      You realized that if you're close enough to detect the RFID, you're probably close enough to read a serial number? These aren't long range transmitters. They're a very close range device. And a barcode on a tire isn't going to last very long, not to mention being distorted every time your tires a bit low...

      --
      Why?
    18. Re:The Law, and they do! by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Read the other posts in this story. Sensors in the road which can pick up RFIDs are a real threat to privacy. Serial numbers or barcodes are not.

    19. Re:The Law, and they do! by binarybum · · Score: 1

      Go for it! ????????

      Installing video cameras with a monitoring service inside homes of people over 65 can reduce the chance that they fall down the stairs unnoticed.

      Any takers? Anybody want to install spycams in their parents house?

      Don't be so compliant. There are better ways of doing things -- think about those ways and promote them rather than accepting solutions that breach human rights and can turn into problems even larger than the one originally trying to be solved.

      I can just imagine the real money maker here being technology used to turn off the damn warning lights every time your tires lose half a psi.

      I'm not sure whether the ABS sensing system detection limit of 25% is a physical limit; more likely it's an applied limit that could be pushed to a plenty sufficient 15% with some R&D (if companys like Phillips weren't tossing their funds into more abstruse approachs)

      --
      ôó
    20. Re:The Law, and they do! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Personally, I would like it if I went into my car dealership (Jiffy Lube, whatever), and when they scanned my tires they said "Hey, these have been recalled".

      This can be done by the same people looking at the serial numbers on your tires. Sure, it takes maybe 30 seconds instead of 5, but you're paying 20 bucks anyway.

      If you want to go high-tech, put some durable barcodes on them. They can be scanned just about as quickly as moving the RFID reader to within 24 inches, but can't be used for "suspect" reasons since you can't scan a barcode on a wheel on a car that is moving.

    21. Re:The Law, and they do! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Its fairly easy to search the web to find recalls for all cars. A friend of mine at work knows a site that has info for every car.

      Its just one of those things that you do to maintian your car safely.

    22. Re:The Law, and they do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is kind of offtopic, so I'll post anon, but what is it with people and cars these days?

      I mean, I attempt to fix and take care of my cars as best I can, but then I see all these people I know that just pump gas into the tank and run it into the ground..... Why don't people see that cars just aren't that solid?

    23. Re:The Law, and they do! by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      You forgot Bill Gates. Alan Ralsky. And Rick Berman. :)

    24. Re:The Law, and they do! by topham · · Score: 1

      why can't you scan a barcode thats moving?

      Just point a steady laser where you expect the barcode to be and detect it. No scanning laser required.

      (I will assume the barcode is SOMEWHERE it can be scanned from the side...)

    25. Re:The Law, and they do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we're at it, make sure to blame the DMCA in some way. Even if it doesn't apply, make sure to wrap it around something that doesn't even make sense and shout about it on slashdot.

      Now that we're on a roll, make sure to at least make a passing reference to microsoft and palladium. Again, whether or not these sentences make any form of sense is inconsequential. Just say them. You'll get moderated up for it.

      At some point, go off on a wild tangent and mention Ogg. Again, forget about the context of the conversation - just mention it. Mention how MP3 sucks and Apple sucks because of it.

      For the final number, make sure to yell "But Linux!" at every possible fucking opportunity.

      "Hey, I got a new toaster"
      "But Linux!"

      "Damnit, my computer is working absolutely perfectly after installing XP"
      "But Linux!!"

      "Man, I gotta pinch a serious loaf"
      "But Linux!!!"

      "Hey - Fuck you"
      "But LINUX!!!!1"

      ad nauseum

      By now your comment should be at +5.

      Sorry.

    26. Re:The Law, and they do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but who bought the legislation?

    27. Re:The Law, and they do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bo-hoo. Maybe you'll vote to support public transportation infrastructure next time.

    28. Re:The Law, and they do! by ksheff · · Score: 1

      With all the recalls that are out in the market today, there is no central authority (that I could find with a quick Google, anyhow) that shows all the recalls.

      Get a subscription to http://www.alldatadiy.com and you can get the recall and technical service bulletins the OEMs send to the dealers..

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    29. Re:The Law, and they do! by Tingler · · Score: 1

      That was a Ford Explorer issue, not a tire issue.

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ro ll over/

    30. Re:The Law, and they do! by BLiP2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and Hillary Rosen.

      ...that bitch...

      --
      Vote Technocratic! Government by killer robots!
    31. Re:The Law, and they do! by uspsguy · · Score: 1

      As someone who works with equipment to scan barcodes on moving parcels, I can say "it ain't quite that simple". We have control over the speed, the ambient lighting, and the approximate location when reading. Our customers have financial incentives to provide legible barcodes and we still have a percentage of failed reads. Our scanners have, at best, about a six inch depth of field and sensors have to determine the size of the box to focus them. In theory, you could read barcoded tires across 3 lanes of traffic at 60 mph (assuming the tire didn't happen to be dirty or muddy) but, in reality, the technology is not yet here or just around the corner.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    32. Re:The Law, and they do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Ford Explorer tragedies were horrible. "

      Yes but, Ford used the tire company as a scapegoat. They did not take responsibility for making a vehicle with such bad suspension that it routinely flips over if a tire blows. Sure the Firestones had a poor record... But the lesson learned was that Explorers handle losing a front tire in a monumentally bad way. I've had front tires blow out or leave the rim completely on both a VW Van and a Jeep CJ-5. (These vehicles are "notorious" for flipping over... but in both situations it was just fine.)

      I suspect people drive a *lot* faster than they say they do, and don't handle emergencies very well. The blame should have been placed squarely on Ford, not Firestone. A car should and could be designed to handle a front tire blowout much better than Ford did it.

    33. Re:The Law, and they do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If implementing technology like this can save one life, I say go for it! "

      If speeding 30 mph over the limit carried a permanent loss of driving privileges plus a five or a ten year prison sentence, I'd support that too. I don't believe for one second that the people in the Ford Explorer tragedies were going under the speed limit.

    34. Re:The Law, and they do! by topham · · Score: 1

      I've used barcode equipment that does a much better job that your average. (about 1.5-2ft reading distance).

      There is a very wide range in ability in barcode equipment based mostly on price.

      I think the RFID would be more reliable. But barcoding at that speed is quite possible.

    35. Re:The Law, and they do! by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      >If implementing technology like this can save one life, I say go for it!

      If you really want to save lives you would mandate that all passengers in a motor vehicle wear helmets and sit in seats with four point restraints. Instituting a national speed limit of 20 mph would help too.

      Auto Accident Death Rates would plummet.

    36. Re:The Law, and they do! by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      If you really want to save lives you would mandate that all passengers in a motor vehicle wear helmets and sit in seats with four point restraints. Instituting a national speed limit of 20 mph would help too

      No...you know what would REALLY work?

      Put a 6 inch spike protruding out of the steering wheel.
      Everyone would drive better.

      Don't make crashes safer. Make people avoid the crash in the first place.

    37. Re:The Law, and they do! by khuber · · Score: 1
      Reading the license plate into an electronic format is much less reliable. I don't know of any system that does it now. I think speed traps are just photographic and don't interpret the image.

      An OCR vision system would have to understand plate variations and deal with very difficult lighting conditions. A plate may be obscured or dirty. It would be much harder to conceal a license plate reader. The technology does exist, however. I imagine it is too expensive to deploy. RFID scanners under the pavement would be much cheaper.

      Anyway, in my mind there is just a certain principle being violated here.

      -Kevin

    38. Re:The Law, and they do! by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      In fact, I'm a big supporter of public transportation. I vote for it whenever I have a chance. I don't drive, and I take public transportation everywhere.

      car free cities

    39. Re:The Law, and they do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only difference between RFID in the tires and and OCR on the license plate is how long it takes to identify the person.

      they are both concealable, and they can both identify the person that owns the vehicle. it just happens that OCR is a more difficult technology to implement, and may at times need human OCR's to translate the image. But it is possible for both to identify you within a time period sufficient for a cop to know who you are before you are pulled over.

    40. Re:The Law, and they do! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Reading a barcode on a wheel going 70 mph is quite possible? You, sir, have no clue. But thanks for playing.

      If you choose to respond, please include a link to a scanner capable of reading a barcode at 70mph from a distance of about 8-50 feet (from the side of the highway to the furthest lane), at a height of between 2 inches and, say, 30 inches (possible variations in tire size and considering barcode could be at the "top" side of the tire as it passes the scanner), in rain or in broad daylight. You said it mostly varies on price, so we won't limit your choices there. Pick the most expensive one you want and tell us which one is capable of the above requirements.

    41. Re:The Law, and they do! by infolib · · Score: 1

      The TREAD (Transportation, Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation) Act requires tire makers to track all of their tires in case they need to recall them.

      Ok. Fine. Then give me a document with the serial no. of my tires when i buy them!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    42. Re:The Law, and they do! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There is no need to use RFID. It would be relatively trivial to, instead of stamping the sides of tires with a number, add a raised area and then physically stamp (with heat so as to enable deformation) the serial number onto the side of the tire, so that it would be physical.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re:The Law, and they do! by Sinical · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cuz they obviously have to know the exact RFID of your tire to know it's got an outstanding recall, right? God forbid they have to read the label that says "Pirelli P-Zero Asymmetrico 225/35R18 Y".

      That'd be too much to ask. No, instead of reading a label, let's create an entirely new system of radio tags, radio tag readers, software to run the reader and communicate stuff, and then training the lube monkeys (with 400% turnover a year) in how to use these things.

      Wee, technology solves everything! Rah rah rah!

    44. Re:The Law, and they do! by topham · · Score: 1

      I did not say one was already designed for it.

      But there is nothing in the specifications which makes it unbelievable.

      For instance, it is quite possible to photograph a tire at that distance and analys the image of the tire. (yes, STOPPED, without bluring from the speed.).

    45. Re:The Law, and they do! by SarekOfVulcan · · Score: 1
      If there's an invasion of privacy going on, Congress is somehow involved.
      Oh, and Hillary Rosen.

      But not for much longer. :-)
      --
    46. Re:The Law, and they do! by uspsguy · · Score: 1

      Our equipment is far better than average, around $10,000+ per scanner. Triple lasers, fixed location, tight specs - we are not talking a hand held cheapy here or even supermarket scanner quality. For us, a no-read means the piece has to be recycled through half of the building, a slow and costly option. Our building scans about 1/2 million items a day. We have hieght sensors that measure the height of the box (acually width and lenght also) and pass information to the scanner to focus moving lenses into 1 of 3 zones from flat on the belt to 18" high. One of the demonstrations is to read a code on a label attached to a frisbee thrown down the line.
      This is still a far cry from reading a moving tire at speed.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  15. Guess I should start buying Firestones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when do the commercial EMP devices come out so we can fry these little suckers?

  16. One good product deserves another. by Chmarr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the first products I can see coming out of this event is little EMP generators that allow you to detect, then blow the living daylight out of the RF circuitry in these things. Remember... any good transmitter is a good receiver, too... find the resonant frequency of this receiver, and you can pump enough energy into it to melt the traces.

    Instant privacy.

    1. Re:One good product deserves another. by Dexheimer · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps a magnet, but where would the fun be in that?

      --
      /There are 10 types of people in this world; those who steal sigs and those don't
    2. Re:One good product deserves another. by namespan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One of the first products I can see coming out of this event is little EMP generators that allow you to detect, then blow the living daylight out of the RF circuitry in these things. Remember... any good transmitter is a good receiver, too... find the resonant frequency of this receiver, and you can pump enough energy into it to melt the traces.

      Mmmm. But will it be legal? Or could you be found guilty of circumventing (or distributing equipment to circumvent) a certified consumer protection device?

      (I'd invoke the DMCA here, but I can't imagine how in the world even it could be used).

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    3. Re:One good product deserves another. by hyperturbopete · · Score: 1

      Grandma's toasted tire transmitter recipe:

      (1) find big microwave (or enlarge your microwave with shop tools)

      (2) pop tire in microwave

      (3) don't cook for too long or you'll smell your house up :-)

    4. Re:One good product deserves another. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a transmitter that is strong enough to cause the traces to reach the flash point of rubber... four wheel blowout?

    5. Re:One good product deserves another. by antarctic · · Score: 1

      if you had an emp that could do that, that would probably be the least destructive thing to do with it

    6. Re:One good product deserves another. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instant Privacy my ass!
      If you are the only one to do this isn't that another way of saying hey I'm here but I am dumb^H^H^H^H smart enough to believe that if I am the only one to disable an identification scheme doesn't that also give an intelligent person some clue as to who I am? Oh yea Joe Twelve-pack just disabled his security measured^H^H^H^H^H^H enhancements so we can't track 'em
      Think people you want to be a member of the flock NOT a leader or a "troublemaker" if you don't want to be noticed or tracked then make it prohibitively so fscking expensive that they will explore other avenues.

    7. Re:One good product deserves another. by xtal · · Score: 4, Informative

      if you had an emp that could do that, that would probably be the least destructive thing to do with it

      I suspect something on the order of 10's of watts (very low power) would easily do it. Even if it was on a harmonic of the original frequency, in which case you might get away with consumer hardware. Or, even something as simple as a strong magnetic field - you can make one of those if you have a coil and current.

      --
      ..don't panic
    8. Re:One good product deserves another. by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      What about just using a hammer? :^)

  17. Swaping like grocery store cards by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, are we going to start seeing people swap tires with each other? I'd read the article but it's already dead. Is swaping tires going to become illegal without re-registering them with the new vehicle? It'd be pretty cool to have whoever is tracking this see most vehicles in four different places at once.

    --
    Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
    1. Re:Swaping like grocery store cards by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't swap your grocery store cards. Everyone can use the same grocery store card. At Safeway, all my friends punch in the same phone number: (510)THE-SCAM.

      Please, join the club.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Swaping like grocery store cards by nukey56 · · Score: 1

      How do we know you're not paid to get us to use that ID, so Safeway can finally figure out what it is that the reclusive geek eats?

    3. Re:Swaping like grocery store cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've definitely been in the income bracket requiring the purchase of used tires. How would this work? Or would they think your car was parked in a used tire lot for three years?

  18. Tinfoil Shielding.... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is pretty easy to hide under my hat, but how am I going to wrap my tires up in tinfoil without the spy satellites seeing me?

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:Tinfoil Shielding.... by chimpo13 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I saw that story and that's the first thing I thought about. You're spying on me and I know it. You've been sneaking into my house and poking small holes into my tinfoil to read my brain. I'll change all 15 locks on my door, and re-check the boards that cover my windows. And you better believe I'll be buying more foil.

    2. Re:Tinfoil Shielding.... by ImpTech · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, but what happens when they put RFID transmitters in the tin foil?

    3. Re:Tinfoil Shielding.... by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      Three words:

      Tin Foil Rims

      Guarantees a fly ride for the paranoid gangsta. Oh yeah.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Tinfoil Shielding.... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Damn you. Damn you all to hell.

    5. Re:Tinfoil Shielding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men in dark suits and sunglasses (yes, even at night) knocking on your front door in 3 ... 2 ...

    6. Re:Tinfoil Shielding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm....Rimjob!

    7. Re:Tinfoil Shielding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. We've been embedding RFID's in tin foil for years. Why do you think one side is shiny?

  19. oooh, let's network them. by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    If Firestone does it, they'll be sure to include this code:

    Tire leftFrontTire = new Tire(props); ...
    if(leftFrontTire.pressure > randomVar) {
    leftFrontTire.implode();
    }

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:oooh, let's network them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would actually be Ford, not Firestone!

    2. Re:oooh, let's network them. by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would be:

      if(leftFrontTire.pressure < randomVar) {

      A large part of the problem in the Explorer/Firestone fiasco was Ford telling customers to under-inflate the tires. They did this in order to compensate for a design flaw in the chassis geometry which made the vehicle more prone to roll-over.

      However, as anyone who lives in a hot climate learns quickly, under-inflation causes the tire to heat up from the increased friction. If the tire gets hot enough, the layers in the tire separate, and will eventually cause a blowout. Every couple of years, the news outlets in this area will run a big story on various folks who had blowouts caused by under-inflated tires.

      The evidence points to some sort of problem with the Firestone tires, but sure enough, Ford didn't get half the bitch-slapping they deserved for their part in it.

    3. Re:oooh, let's network them. by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and we know what the randomVar is. A Ford Explorer.

    4. Re:oooh, let's network them. by danoatvulaw · · Score: 1
      oooh, let's network them.
      Man, only us nerds would think of something like this....
    5. Re:oooh, let's network them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouldn't this be a pointer since using new?

      leftFrontTire->implode();

  20. Some Cars Already Have Pressure Warning Systems by MythosTraecer · · Score: 3, Informative

    If they're going to embed electronics in tires, I wish they'd start with tiny pressure gauges

    Several cars already have tire low pressure warning systems. I know the Chevy Corvette has had such a system for the past decade, at least.

    --

    --Mythos
    1. Re:Some Cars Already Have Pressure Warning Systems by cube00 · · Score: 0

      My mom's minivan has that even :O, there was a huge nail in the tire and the gauges went off, pretty cool if you ask me.. I doubt many people notice their tires are getting flat before its already too late.

      I mean, when was the last time you looked at your tires before you got in?

    2. Re:Some Cars Already Have Pressure Warning Systems by MrEnigma · · Score: 0

      My car ('97 Grand Prix) has this system built in. However it has nothing to do with detecting the actual tires it self. It senses the normal (read: average) height of the shock, when it goes low, the "Check Tire Pressure" light comes on. Saved me a few times. Works great!

      --
      GeekWares - Buy and Download Today!
    3. Re:Some Cars Already Have Pressure Warning Systems by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can get a system like this aftermarket, too. It runs a few hundred bucks, and will tell you PSI for each tire, ostensibly in realtime. A sensor has to be installed on each wheel. Carparts.com spammed me when they first had them available for sale, and I'd like to link to it, but their search engine sucks eggs, when you search on "tire pressure" it takes you to the tire shop. Lameasses.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. So how is this a privacy issue? by alen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The manufacturer already knows which VIN goes to who. The bank knows the VIN of the car since it issues the loan. Your state government knows the VIN of your car when you register it. Your insurance company knows your VIN and everything about your car from it. Everytime you bring your car to the dealer they they note the work done by your VIN so the manufacturer can notice any major problems. So how is this going to take away from your privacy?

    1. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by n1ywb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah but people just can't secretly scan your VIN every time you go through a tollbooth, stop at a traffic light (You KNOW that those wires in the road don't really make the light green), or drive through McDonalds.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by GreatOgre · · Score: 1

      When was the last time starting checking to see how long you stayed at the mall, or how far you drove today, or anything else you do in your car? How often do they correlate it to your VIN and/or yourself? That's the invasion of privacy!

    3. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah but people just can't secretly scan your VIN every time you go through a tollbooth, stop at a traffic light (You KNOW that those wires in the road don't really make the light green), or drive through McDonalds.


      You are definitely right, it's absolutely absurd that they're doing this. Next thing we're going to be given an identification number that we have to prominently display on our car that is linked to our VIN that _anybody_ can see and find out information about us!

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you.. Your car registration is tied to your VIN, and your license plate is tied to your registration, and your ezpass is tied to your license plate... Yes, virginia, they could even track your visits to Mickey D's...

      Or were you being sarcastic?

    5. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by Taldo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The difference is one of convenience.

      As things stand now... 'they' pretty much have to be reasonably sure you're guilty of a crime before tracking you. It's way too much of a pain in the ass to do it casually. (You have to set up camera/ocr survelliance, reference the state DMV database, etc...)

      With something like this? The entire process can be easily automated.

      Every time someone calls you paranoid about privacy violations.... remember: You're only 'too boring for them to worry about' when monitoring and survelliance are a pain in the ass. Once it becomes quick, easy and automated? You're a target.

      Do I have anything to hide? Legally, morally or ethically? No. Do I want a religious fanatic with a history of behavior that most of us would call 'mentally unstable' and entirely too much political influence, (read: our current Attorney General) to be watching every step I make? No. Do I want someone watching my purchasing habits so that they can avoid the precautions I've taken to get away from their advertising? No. Do I want someone's lawyer to go over my buying habits for perfectly legal activities that he might be able to use against me? (Well of COURSE he must have been responsible for the accident your honor!!!! Look.... he's stopped at a liquor store twice in the past MONTH!!!! He must have been drunk and THAT'S why my client jumped the median and hit him head on!!!!) No.

      Paranoia is only unjustified if you're more trouble than going after you is worth. Advances like this dramatically reduce the amount of trouble you are.

    6. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      by building an automated detection system. everytime your vehical stops a a light can be monitored, every time you go through a toll, you could be monitored.
      Then some clever person writes some code to look for 'abnormalities' in your routine. WHats that, you went to a convience store where the clerk is being watched for sell crack? Now your under some sort of investigation.
      There have been countries that have tried this on a more limited(technologically speaking) and people in thouse countries have had there lives ruined. Now that its easier, do you think t won't happen?

      If some sort of checks and bablances is put into play so they can only look at your driving habits with a warrant, that would change things. But there is nothing to prevent us from being abused by technology.

      Even if you had 100% faith that all the people in power had you best interestes in mind, what about the next people in power?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they don't have a system that can very easily read all this stuff (except the ezpass tag). As far as the ezpass tag goes, i could always leaveit home if i watned to, or do what a friend of mine did, and leave it wrapped in foil under the seat.

    8. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RFID is not limited to 24 inches. It's capable of hundreds of meters. RFID tags operate under cell phone frequencies. No need to mess with the roads.

      Each cell tower logging timestamped VIN numbers as the cars go by. Each log sent to a central database. This would allow you to be tracked down to each cell phone tower with technology that is out in the world right now.

      A complete log of everywhere you've driven from now until the end of your life. Couple that with the information collected about who you've called, what you've purchased, what you've read on the internet.

      Are human beings sufficiently moral to be trusted with this sort of power over other human beings? The databases will be around forever.

      Most definitly not. Societies have always degraded to the point where citizens recieved little more respect than farm animals. It's more cost effective to just do what needs to be done than to worry about all the extra hassle that comes with treating people with dignity and respect. The path of least resistance.

      Society is always on the verge of doing terrible injustice to it's people, and so it's logical for people to always be alert, just as people who live by the ocean must always be alert for
      storms. It's a real threat and RFID technology is something that can easily be used to do great unjustice against societies. Don't surprised if it happens because the temptation to treat
      you like an animal was there long before RFID technology was ever concieved.

    9. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Yeah but people just can't secretly scan your VIN every time you go through a tollbooth, stop at a traffic light (You KNOW that those wires in the road don't really make the light green), or drive through McDonalds.

      Also the people doing the scanning could potentially be anyone. Not just the police or whoever built the road.

    10. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by mpe · · Score: 1

      RFID is not limited to 24 inches. It's capable of hundreds of meters.

      Which would make it easy for someone to follow you. Including criminals and terrorists.

    11. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by valisk · · Score: 1
      I think you know as well as I do, that the diffence is of a whole different magnitude. Yes I can look at your numberplate and mark down that I saw you sat at the lights near the grocery store.
      Unless, I decide to follow you I can't do much more.
      Unless I have cameras at the side of the road, using which I can watch you as you drive round town, but then I can't watch Johnny, Billy-Bob and Sue-Ellen
      I can set up an OCR system which watches those camera feeds and tracks you but it's going to be expensive and will fuck up fairly often in various weather conditions.
      Or I can fund the use of an RF device and build montoring posts all over town, I can forbid you to remove these devices and force you to have your tyres changed by 'authorised' individuals.
      Using my monitoring station, I can check the average drive time from any point in town to any other point and automaticaly fine people who drive 5% above the average
      And what if I need a little extra revenue, well I can synergise my system with big business advertising.
      Now every morning on your way to work the new LCD billboards reveal an advert targeted just for you at the very moment you pass by.
      I can also sell your wife the data she would like to see which shows that you were parked outside her best friends house between 2am and 5am last week, when you were 'out drinking'
      I can determine that you were in the vicinity of a street robbery last week and if you refuse to testify I will have you for contempt of court.
      I can see that you drove along in a mass protest against fuel taxes, next time you pass by the toll both you are going to be stopped for a couple of hours so I can harass you, and this will happen more often because I have shared that information with the sherrif in the next town.

      Yes you say but RF devices are passive and can't do that.
      Well I say what about active RF devices?
      There aren't any you say and how would you power them?
      You would make them kinetic energy based so driving round town powers the little RF transmitter to tell me where you are, the RF in your clothes lets me see where you are going when you enter the mall.
      It lets me see that you didn't pay for that dress in your bag that you got as a make up gift for your wife, and you have to spend 40 minutes trying to explain that you did pay for it only the clerk forgot to deactivate the RF tag.

      Well maybe, but next time I will be keeping a special eye on you and my friend the sherrif in the next town, he will also and so will his friends and their friends.

      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    12. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hundreds of meters? Heh.

      Prove it.

      The best ones I've seen go to about 5 meters.

    13. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most airport parking places record your plates automatically. Look for the cameras when you pay your way out. They claim it's to protect you from car thieves. I'm sure there's another reason.

    14. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by valisk · · Score: 1

      So am I, and this new technology will only serve to make this other reason more efficient in its application

      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    15. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I'd like to respond to every part of your comment, but that's a lie. I really wouldn't. You are amazingly paranoid. Everybody can track you just as much as they want to, right now. RF transmitters require a reader within 2'.

      OCR + Camera equipment is dirt cheap too, so they can take a snapshot of every vehicle passing every quarter mile. But who is going to? Who really cares? Who wants the data? Nobody. That's right, you aren't that special that people are going to invest billions of dollars to track you. It'll be used for it's purpose because you just aren't that special.

      Expect toll boths, and other government locations will only use it both to aid in capture (reference vehicles with oustanding tickets or whose owner has a warrant) and for automated billing. If you think that marketing firms are going to invest in the technology, make a deal with every city/state roadway system, and have targetted adverts that show up for that 1/10th of a second that you and other drivers are sharing, you are a plain idiot.

      Why don't you put your creative energy towards something beneficial instead of finding idiotic ways your privacy can be invaded that can already happen? I can buy a CD that has your VIN, address, and all sorts of personal information on it, right now -- go educate yourself and you will realize that your privacy now is only available because no one cares about you.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    16. Re:So how is this a privacy issue? by scm · · Score: 1

      Yeah but people just can't secretly scan your VIN every time you go through a tollbooth, stop at a traffic light (You KNOW that those wires in the road don't really make the light green), or drive through McDonalds.

      Your VIN is printed on the front of your car, along the bottom of the windshield (IIRC on the left). If they put a camera in any of those locations, they could just as easily get your VIN.

  22. What purpose does it serve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inventory tracking? Quality Assurance? Big Brother? I'm sure this is the dawn of a new era and I welcome it with hope, fear.

  23. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The best use I could think of for this would be for those drive-through beer and liquor stores. Every time a car drove through, you could record the ids' of its tires. Then, if the customer bought cigarettes, you could store the tire ids in a database of cigarette buyers. You could sell this database to health insurance companies for a fortune so they could bust people who made fraudulent claims about being a nonsmoker on their health insurance and deny them benefits.

    Man, this is a terriffic idea.

    1. Re:Excellent by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Someone mod the above up. This is a perfect example of a workable invasion of privacy that this could lead to... If you pay with credit card, the store could easily tie your name to your RFIDs.

    2. Re:Excellent by jasonrocks · · Score: 1

      This is scary stuff. Potentially parents could track children using cars. Attendance at school could be affected by RFIDs. The big question is, has anyone or will anyone put rfids in items without our knowledge, i.e. wallets. Can I buy a RFID and scanner?

      --

      void
    3. Re:Excellent by alonsoac · · Score: 1

      If you're serious:
      Of course one could just say that the beer or cigarrets were for someone else. Then your terrific idea falls apart.

      If you meant to be funny:
      Better luck next time.

    4. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you could say it. And the health insurance companies could trot out a database entry proving that you'd been buying one soft pack of Winston Lights every four days at stores all over town. And the jury could decide what to do with the evidence presented to them.

      Evidence is presented in court cases not as a single point of evidence but as a suite of evidence. This would make for a nice addition to any suite of evidence.

    5. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a bastard. He's got a valid point, he's not trying to be funny.

    6. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The best use I could think of for this would be for those drive-through beer and liquor stores

      Of course, you could just snap a shot of that person's license plates. Sure, it requires something or someone to read the text, but it's not like you're not already broadcasting your identity everywhere you drive.

    7. Re:Excellent by mpe · · Score: 1

      The best use I could think of for this would be for those drive-through beer and liquor stores. Every time a car drove through, you could record the ids' of its tires. Then, if the customer bought cigarettes, you could store the tire ids in a database of cigarette buyers.

      Sure the cigarette companies would pay lots of money for this.

      You could sell this database to health insurance companies for a fortune so they could bust people who made fraudulent claims about being a nonsmoker on their health insurance and deny them benefits.

      Except that the tags only track the vehicle rather than the driver.

    8. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could sell this database to health insurance companies for a fortune so they could bust people who made fraudulent claims about being a nonsmoker on their health insurance and deny them benefits.

      Uhm, but they are making fraudulent claims. Thereby raising honest customer's premiums. Where's the problem?

      Posted anonymously to protect my identity amongst the /bots.

  24. Re:what does this have to do with my rights online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, new form of invasion of privacy. They're good in theory, bad in practice. That's all I need to do is to be catalogged, tagged, numbered, and ID'd. Yeah, sure. I just need everyone to know where I am, my every step, everything I do, seeing if I wiped my nose, showered daily, ate properly. I hope these die quickly and people wake up to the fact that these aren't convinence items. They're F'ing invasion of privacy and another way to strip away what last few shreads of freedom we have. F'ing losers.

  25. Easy to disable by MacAndrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just use an icepick to perforate the chip. :)

    This decision was mentioned a few days ago in the Times I think, and the intent to transmit tire pressures was specified. As for privacy problems, I think it's a little premature. Anyone close enough to scan your "tire chips" could just write down or photograph your license plate anyway (thouse red light cameras come pretty close), and soon enough with OCR traffic cameras will be able to record your passing. So anonymity in public is a fleeting thing anyway, and the Fourth Amendment won't stop it.

    Also, it is easy enough to buy tires anonymously by using the green stuff.

    To protect privacy, campaigning has to focus on the weak leak: The government. That the administration would even propose TIA reflects a serious problem already; privacy is the orphan right.

    1. Re:Easy to disable by Zaffle · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is convienance, it will be very easy for "someone" to start tracking your movements.
      Most traffic lights (atleast in NZ major cities) have sensors on the road to detect if there are cars waiting. These are simply big loops of wires that pick up the magnetic disturbance due to the large amount of metal sitting on it. (Which is why, before they made them more sensative, motorbikes had problems, some didn't have enough of a signature to set of the sensor, so the lights never went green).

      If you replace, or even if possible, use the existing coil as a RFID sensors, you could track ever set of tires that has a RFID past the sensor.
      If every intersection in a city had these sensors, you could start watching where people were going.

      This *can* be a good thing. Someone robs a bank, police chase in progress, yeah I need a track on a vechile thats passing the intersection of 5th and main st... now.", and the cops can watch whereever they go. Also detecting speeding, etc.

      However, its also a bad thing, since most people don't want the police knowing they go.

      AS for the problem with associating tires to actual people. Ever go get a warrant of fitness? Bing! They could note the RFIDs there. Maybe you go through the drivethough at McDonalds, use your ATM card, bing again. This may sound unlikely, and a little paranoid (but a little paranoia is healthy), but less likely things have happened. Toll booths (though we don't have many in New Zealand) are another biggy. Especially if you are already using a prepay card system.

      RFIDs are another tool like the hammer. You can use it for bloody good things, and damn evil things too. The issue is, how much are we willing to put up with (as a society, not as a person), and how much will we know about the systems put in place?

      Oh, and if you think you can just destroy the RFID tag, and have no problems? Wait till laws are passed that require them. You are driving down the road, pass over a sensor, and before you know it, a cop pulls you over and gives you a body cavity search for terrorist like activities.

      However, there will always be ways around the system, as the saying goes "any system created by man can be defeated by man".

      Have fun, always wear your tinfoil underwear and hats, and don't forget to check for black helicopters!

      --

      I use to have a funny sig, but slash cut it off, and I forgot what the punchline was.
    2. Re:Easy to disable by smccurry · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that they could place sensors along the road and eventually track everyone everywhere. You might think that people would be complaining if they did this, but if it was done in the name of stopping terrorists or criminals, how many people are going to complain enough to stop it?

    3. Re:Easy to disable by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just use an icepick to perforate the chip

      Of course, you do need to find the chip first. Those things are getting really small at this point.

      and soon enough with OCR traffic cameras will be able to record your passing. So anonymity in public is a fleeting thing anyway, and the Fourth Amendment won't stop it.

      I hate this argument, every time I see it. I agree that with the current technology, it is becoming eaiser to do this sort of thing, but why exactly should we adopt the attitude of "roll over and accept it"? The only way privacy issues will ever gain any traction now, or in the future, is if we start fighting them where we can. The idea that privacy is already gone and we should "get over it" is absolute idiocy.

      Also, it is easy enough to buy tires anonymously by using the green stuff.

      You're forgetting that the shop, which installs the tires, collects all of the information about the customer. (VIN, name, address, telephone number). Unless you mount all of your tires yourself, which is a real pain without the right equipment.

      In my not so humble opinion, this whole monitoring and tracking thing is really turned on its head. The govenment is there to serve the people. Not the other way around. If anything, we should have tracking devices implanted in all govenment officials, and in all govenment equipment, such that, any one who wishes to, could log on to a web site and track any and all govenment resources, except where it might create a real national security issue.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    4. Re:Easy to disable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You're forgetting that the shop, which installs the tires, collects all of the information about the customer. (VIN, name, address, telephone number). Unless you mount all of your tires yourself, which is a real pain without the right equipment.


      Last time I had tires mounted, I brought the rims & tires in myself, and had 'em mounted. No name, VIN, phone, or anything. Simple anonymous purchase. I did buy the tires online, though, I suppose it's possible they could track me that way. (oh eek)

      With my car, I don't trust them to properly mount the (rare & expensive original) hubcaps & trim ring properly, and it's easy enough to slip the jack under the car and mount four wheels to the hubs.

    5. Re:Easy to disable by hyperturbopete · · Score: 1

      Anyone close enough to scan your "tire chips" could just write down or photograph your license plate anyway (thouse red light cameras come pretty close)

      If they only wanted it to work at close range, they could've used barcodes for much cheaper. (supermarket checkout counter technology)

      If RFID is for implementing hand-inspection ID, then its some congressional pork in the standards process... Otherwise they want drive-by ID of your tires (why the tires and not the car? I dont know)

    6. Re:Easy to disable by MacAndrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      The idea that privacy is already gone and we should "get over it" is absolute idiocy.

      Gee, thanks. :)

      My point was different: I think fighting tire chips is silly because the state already has plenty of alternatives. We can't stop it because it's already happened, and making a protest over some token new item is a waste of time; we might as well accept whatever benefits we can get.

      The prevalence of video cameras makes me skeptical that law enforcement would bother assembling the database and tearing up all the streets when they already have a great system of tracking -- license plates. It wasn't widely discussed, but the snipers' license plates were run something like 9 times and their plate was photographed by a red light camera in the weeks they were doing their thing. If we had known what we were looking for we would have caught them earlier; meanwhile, law enforcement was apparently running the plates on no specific suspicion (remember, everyone said we were looking for a white truck). So ... how often do average citizens have their plate checked? I bet it's a lot, now that squad cars have computers and constant wireless links. And every time they do, it's a record of where the car was at what time. Next, the cameras will do this work automatically. Screw the tire chips.

      The Fourth Amendment is no help, because the Supreme Court ruled 20 years ago that the police could place a tracking device on your care without a warrant (!). I doubt exterior surveillance by camera would raise a constitutional problem, though I do hope that the Supreme Court will at some point look at the aggregate of all these little intrusions and conclude that an overall police state is unconstitutional. However, that would inject them into government in a way the Court does not want; and they've been fairly indifferent to privacy (notwithstanding the surprise thermal imaging decision).

      So the effort of privacy advocates must be in legislation. The courts won't do it, and avoiding Michelin tires definitely won't do it. I'm hardly advocating acquiescence, just not tilting at windmills.

      Oh, the icepick was a joke. :)

    7. Re:Easy to disable by mangu · · Score: 1
      That reminds me of the time when I worked for a federal-government-owned telecommunications company in Brazil. That company was privatized and bought by (gasp!) WorldCom in 1998. They had *huge* billing problems right at the start. The reason? They had 30 million customers who made 150 million long-distance calls each month, and the billing system they had couldn't handle the load.


      Well, I'm as worried as anybody else about the privacy issues of this RFID (Read the Fucking ID?) here, but one should also think about the logistic problems of handling this data and getting any useful information from it. I think we'll survive...

    8. Re:Easy to disable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the heck? I couldn't even microwave my jeans when sparks started flying all over the oven!

    9. Re:Easy to disable by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      Oh, the icepick was a joke. :)

      Which demonstrates well the problem of a police state. A police state is not about catching bad guys, it's about control. This is why you can post the suggestion that one perforate one's tires with an icepick and get pegged straight up to 5. All the moderators are too busy squashing those they don't like.

    10. Re:Easy to disable by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      This decision was mentioned a few days ago in the Times I think, and the intent to transmit tire pressures was specified. As for privacy problems, I think it's a little premature. Anyone close enough to scan your "tire chips" could just write down or photograph your license plate anyway (thouse red light cameras come pretty close), and soon enough with OCR traffic cameras will be able to record your passing. So anonymity in public is a fleeting thing anyway, and the Fourth Amendment won't stop it.

      You are insufficiently paranoid. It would be a lot cheaper to deploy a network of mesh-networked RFID readers at every intersection in america than it would be to deploy a network of mesh-networked OCR'ing digital cameras at every intersection in america. With this technology it becomes pathetically inexpensive and trivial to track where every car is going all of the time with current technology.

      As it is, if you have a good reason to hide your car's identity (such as going somewhere to participate in a plot to overthrow the government) all you have to do is claim your plates were stolen and go to the DMV, they will give you a piece of paper to put in your back window. It's completely legal and you will seldom get pulled over. (I got pulled over with one in my back window but it was all fogged up, I didn't want to wait for it to defrost.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Easy to disable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is the peril that really stupid people won't recognize a throwaway joke. Maybe we should have a smiley to stop these people from getting too literal and maybe injuring themselves?

    12. Re:Easy to disable by jafac · · Score: 1

      What about the gummint burying sensors and recorders under the pavement. Any time you drive over the sensor, a record is added to you in their database, noting time and date, etc.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  26. The ID'ing sucks... by MoThugz · · Score: 0

    but I sure as hell would like to know how they're planning to embed miniature electronic devices in rubber.

    Things I'd like to know are;
    1) How is this thing powered?
    2) Assuming it's battery powered, how long will it last?
    3) What will happen when the power supply runs out?
    5) What's the point of the device in the first place? Can I find back my stolen wheels by reporting the theft to Michelin and the Authorities?

    1. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Informative

      They put in in people inside a capsule thats the size of a grain of rice and most of that size is the capsule. The devices consist of a single TINY microchip (grain of sand size) and a very tiny inductor (two grains of sand size).

      The devices are powered by received RF energy, which the "reader" transmits. This isn't crazy, remember crystal AM radios? Did you know that you can listen to AM stations using a reciever that's powered BY the AM signal? Did you know that you can string a long wire parallel to the power lines and steal power from the electric company via electrical induction?

      You can read ALL about commercial RFID systems at http://www.microchip.com/1010/pline/frequency/rfca ts/rfid/index.htm, which manufactures a whole line of the devices.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by blenderfish · · Score: 1


      As for questions 1,2,3, the tags are powered by radio waves used to communicate with it (or sent on another band). Ever wired up a crystal radio? You don't need power, because radio waves _are_ power.

      As for question 4, no. errr.. yes.

      As for question 5, who knows? Not like they couldn't use a bar code.

    3. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, the power comes from the scanning device. I don't remember all the details.

    4. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by Dexheimer · · Score: 1

      Howstuffworks has some good info on RFID based devices.

      Smart Labels
      E-Z Pass
      Anti-Shoplifting Devices

      From cocaine and lockpicking to quantum mechanics and C++, you have to admit that HSW is very comprehensive.

      --
      /There are 10 types of people in this world; those who steal sigs and those don't
    5. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) RFID tags are powered by the signal of the transmitter. Quoting Slashdot: "Most RFID tags use the power from the initial radio signal to transmit their response and hence can be placed anywhere imaginable"

      2) See 1)

      3) See 1)

      4) Where the fsck did 4) go ?

      5) Tracking your tires, when they think you should buy new ones, call you home and tell you: "Your tires need replacing, BTW we know all the places you've been the last 3 years and know all your shopping likes, would you like us to sell you whatever we want ?" or "We could even offer you (for a reasonable price) your privacy back."

      QUESTION: Wouldn't it be easier for them (for legal purposes, you know the TREAD) just to add serial numbers(easily readable) and create a less intrusive database of customers ?.

      ANSWER: a) YES, but if would be needed to expend a lot of money on IT for that. And b) There's a lot of business opportunity on tracking customers (and they know most people won't complain on having their privacy taken away. Why? 'Cause people just don't care on being informed. Rememeber, we geeks are just a minority.

    6. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by MoThugz · · Score: 1

      Missing number 4 is...

      4) Profit!

    7. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by Frater+219 · · Score: 1
      They put in in people inside a capsule thats the size of a grain of rice and most of that size is the capsule. The devices consist of a single TINY microchip (grain of sand size) and a very tiny inductor (two grains of sand size).

      The truly irritating thing -- for someone who likes to think of himself as skeptical and rational -- is that it wasn't so long ago this was the stuff of paranoid schizophrenia.

      I didn't say "the stuff of science fiction", mind you. I said "the stuff of paranoid schizophrenia." I knew people years before this RFID stuff was public, who believed that "someone" had implanted a "chip" or a "radio transmitter" inside their bodies, to track them. Those people were mentally disturbed and their beliefs were delusions. Now ... well ... these things exist, they are getting widely deployed -- people put them in their dogs after all.

      I'm going to sound like a Kuro5hin poster to ask this -- but what does it mean about our society that we are making paranoid delusions come true so easily? Apparently our laws encourage it, our police and other government agencies are all very willing to forward it, and our industries to implement it.

      If we want to live in a dystopia, all we need to do is implement the technologies and policies of dystopia. If we want to live in an insane society, all we need to do is implement the technologies and policies of insanity. I'd rather neither, thanks.

    8. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by Inda · · Score: 1
      The devices are powered by received RF energy, which the "reader" transmits. This isn't crazy, remember crystal AM radios? Did you know that you can listen to AM stations using a reciever that's powered BY the AM signal?
      Those were the days. I remember the war. I remember running a 1000 meters of copper wire from my wireless receiver, thorough the hole in the wall, up the old plum tree, over next door's fence, up the telegraph pole, round the community outhouse, over the refuse ditch and back again. The joy of those cold winter nights huddled round the old faithful listening to the world service was truly a delight. Oh how I miss my wireless and, come to think of it, my old gramophone... ...actually, no I don't. I'm lying. I'm only 28.
      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    9. Re:The ID'ing sucks... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Did you know that you can string a long wire parallel to the power lines and steal power from the electric company via electrical induction?

      What's interesting, is that I've heard that if you draw too much energy, the electric company will detect the drop in voltage & come out to see what's wrong (then have criminal charges brought against you).

  27. Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    This is happening slowly, but SURELY. In 2010 Slashdot will have articles such as "ChildTracker-2000(TM) is now a mandatory installation at all Hospitals in the United States(C). All newborns will be protected with a tiny chip installed under their skin in the palm of their hand."

    Seriously, what's to say, after EVERYTHING is tagged, that the masses could not also be tagged themselves? The Government tells women what they can and can't do with their own bodies all the time (abortion). Extend that control to men's bodies as well, and add human-chip implants.

  28. Pressure Monitors by pll178 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can already buy pressure monitors for your tires. It's not as cool as an embedded pressure gauge, but it does the job and it's wireless so you can get realtime data.

    http://www.tirerack.com/accessories/smartire/sma rt ire_all.jsp

  29. I don't see the problem with RFID by Jeff+Probst · · Score: 0, Troll

    And that is because I have nothing to hide.

    Currently we rely on positioning techniques such as cell cite triangulation for solving murders and the like. Imagine if we could identify everyone who was close to the scene of a murder or rape?

    Surely the privacy implications should be balanced with the crime fighting implications?

    1. Re:I don't see the problem with RFID by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Like criminals won't figure a way to block the signal?

    2. Re:I don't see the problem with RFID by Oliver+Newland · · Score: 0, Troll
      What you're overlooking is the obvious problem (so obvious that it went unmentioned in the article) -- the power consumption. Now, I know that sometimes small details slip by, but you don't have to get a 1600 on the SATs (like I did) or a 175 on the IQ test (like I did) to know that the glaring problem that these will present is the prolonging of the electronic and oil consumerism that is destroying nation as a whole. There's basically 3 problems with your comment:

      1. You overlooked the power consumption issues

      2. You did not get 1600 on the SATs.

      3. You did not get 175 on the IQ test


      While I'm all for equal rights for the less intelligently-advantaged, I ask that you please don't post something inane like this again.
      --

      I got a 1600 on the SATs.
    3. Re:I don't see the problem with RFID by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

      Imagine if we could identify everyone who was close to the scene of a murder or rape?

      Cool! Instant suspects! Who cares if the people were actually involved. They were close to the area, so they must have been up to no good. Bring 'em in!

    4. Re:I don't see the problem with RFID by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Like criminals won't figure a way to block the signal?"

      They will, but the sparks will be quite pretty.

    5. Re:I don't see the problem with RFID by knobmaker · · Score: 1

      Okay, the ole "I have nothing to hide" justification for a police state. I can't figure out why more folks don't realize that the definition of a police state is a society in which everyone has something to hide.

      Imagine if we could identify everyone who was close to the scene of a murder or rape?

      Yeah, just imagine. Imagine that it's you who happened to be parked near the site of a rape-in-progress and that you don't have an alibi. Are you going to enjoy the experience of being taken into custody and questioned? And if they don't come up with a likelier-looking suspect than you and there's a lot of political pressure to solve the case, are you going to enjoy being the fall guy? Of course, that could never happen, because as we all know, no innocent people go to jail.

      My view is that it's better for the occasional criminal to escape justice than for innocent people to be punished for crimes they didn't commit. Admirers of police states like it the other way around. Until it's their turn.

    6. Re:I don't see the problem with RFID by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Technology is technology. If we have the technology to unambiguously identify everyone at or around a murder scene or a kidnapping, we can also identify anyone at or around a protest rally.

      Sorry, I just don't trust those who wield such technology to have both the prudence and selflessness to use their power only for the greater good.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    7. Re:I don't see the problem with RFID by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 0

      You've got nothing to hide, right? All that unreasonable search and siezure stuff is there just to protect criminals, right? I mean, who else needs constitutional protection except the ungodly peasants? Fucking apathetic moron. Can't fight the system because you're too old and tired to, so you slip into apathy. It feels good there, doesn't it. Fuck you and your "freedom must be balanced with crime fighting" bullshit. I'm gonna burn all my nice karma, not for you, but for all the other apathetic do-nothings that simply ride the banana boat to hell. In every totalitarian country, the people saw it coming. Restrictions to freedom here for a good reason, there for necessity, till they're all GONE. Don't come whining to the rest of us when you're OWNZ'd by some dumpster diving skr1pt k1dd13 who found out where you go out on Friday afternoon and for how long, and what your pets and kids names are. Fuck crime fighting with technology, dammit! It's the apathetic do-nothing, don't-get-involved-and keep-your-mouth-shut types who fucking broke the system in the first place. Look, it's not due to lack of tech that law enforcement fails, it's when good people do nothing because they're afraid to get involved that evil, crime, and ultimately, well-intentioned totalitarianism can thrive.
      flame off
      Sorry if I offended you. I tend to do that.

    8. Re:I don't see the problem with RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, YOU live in a freedom-less society as a controlled drone.

      I choose freedom over safety. My safety is MY responsibility, not yours, not the governments.

      JD

  30. You may want to check out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a similar story posted on OSNews around 2 weeks ago, here : http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=2545

    -------------
    anjotoes

  31. Fantastic idea, but... by Mr_Tulip · · Score: 1
    The article fails to mention how these tags will be read.

    I would buy these in an instant, if it came with a portable reciever, at reasonable cost, of course. Ideally, it would be conntected to a pressure sensor, allowing me to instantly read current tyre pressure. Even knowing the recommended PSI and date of manufacture, as stated in the article, would be useful information to have.

    If the only people able to easily read these tags are the manufacturer and the government, then I'm not really interested.

    Other than that, Michelin do make great tyres.

    -My Karma ran over your Dogma

  32. Its a foreboding sign... by syphoon · · Score: 1

    That I can see three "Your Rights Online" stories on the /. front page. However, Firestone and others are quite capable of using this as a marketing advantage. Like other such privacy concerns, its a matter of how many manufacturers jump on board.

  33. phew by Siniset · · Score: 1
    And here I was, thinking that I might have to go through life without some corporate or government agency knowing where I am at all times...

    "the kingdom of heaven must be taken by storm."

  34. Re:frist host... by clancey · · Score: 1

    Actually, they're working on automatic tire gauges as well as automagically pumping up your tires while you drive.

    --
    clancey
  35. Re:Me too by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    can disperse a gasoline truck within 5 minutes

    I'm sure that's a misdemeanor in most states.

  36. Because the RFID can be read by remote sensors... by isaac · · Score: 1
    The manufacturer already knows which VIN goes to who. The bank knows the VIN of the car since it issues the loan. Your state government knows the VIN of your car when you register it. Your insurance company knows your VIN and everything about your car from it. Everytime you bring your car to the dealer they they note the work done by your VIN so the manufacturer can notice any major problems. So how is this going to take away from your privacy?
    Because the RFID tags can be read remotely, making it possible, effectively, to read your VIN remotely. Of course your state already has your VIN - that's what creates the privacy bugaboo. If the RFID in the tires is associated with the VIN, a sensor in or near the roadway could read the VIN of passing cars. There are existing RFID systems that can identify vehicles remotely (e.g. EZPass toll collection systems), but EZPass is optional and obvious (in that one has to sign up for EZPass, and the tag is mounted in the windscreen area). This is an RFID tag embedded in a tire - it's not like you sign up for it seperately. THAT'S the issue.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  37. Hmmm, How many have bought cheap used tires? by 3seas · · Score: 1

    It's not uncommon for Tire stores to hang on to some tires that still had some good tread on them, as a result of a customer saying replace all my tires, even when all four don't really need replacing.

    Sooo, when it comes to tracking.....kinda pointless

  38. F1 cars have pressure gauges by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and they actually use spread-spectrum radio to communicate the level back to the driver in real time.

    Cost a lot more then RFID tags, I'm sure.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  39. uh... don't be dense by IBitOBear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you car is "suddenly" equipt with five (don't forget the spare) transmitters that each broadcast a unique serial number in response to a promiscuously broadcasted request, well, that is "bad" from a privacy standpoint.

    Now associate those numbers with your VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) which uniquely identifies your car.

    Your VIN is already connected to things like your name, address, insurance carrier and so on.

    So now you are driving down a street and any number of automated systems can know it is you (well, your car at least). So you have essentially been tagged like a spring buck.

    Worse, but more interesting, a well equipt "ring" of duck-and-squat or similar con artists can now "interview" your car to see if you've got good rip-off potential.

    Authorities can target and track you. Who needs racial profiling? The cop is asleep in his car when an alarm goes off to tell him someone meeting his favorite criteria is driving by. How about "that car is owned by a white person" listing getting your black roomate killed for borrowing your car?

    Far worse than that, the piece in question is easily accessable.

    If systems (toll booths etc?) start using this data for any purpose then I could "swap out" one of your tires and drive around "as you", possibly for days. When was the last time you *really* looked at your passenger side rear wheel? How about your spare?

    In even legitimate cases ("Sure Clem, you can borrow my snow tires for the weekend...") of transfer you could become identity-entangled with who knows what...

    Being made "trackable" is always a rights issue.

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
    1. Re:uh... don't be dense by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A re-edit:

      If you car is "suddenly" equiped with one or two liscence plates that each display a unique serial number by means of reflected visual light, well, that is "bad" from a privacy standpoint.

      Now associate those numbers with your VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) which uniquely identifies your car.

      Your VIN is already connected to things like your name, address, insurance carrier and so on.

      So now you are driving down a street and any number of automated systems (OCR) can know it is you (well, your car at least). So you have essentially been tagged like a spring buck. .... Do I need to continue?

      You car already HAS a unique identifier tacked on it, your liscence plate which is illegal to remove or alter. More, unlike RFID which requires a transmitter and close (very close in the scale and speed on whcih cars operate) proximity to operate, a liscence plate can simply be read with your eyes. It is tied to your registration, which is tied to your vin. With a liscence plate number and an onld analogue radio a cop can call up just about anything they need to know about the car in question.

    2. Re:uh... don't be dense by enos · · Score: 1

      I think you just listed the reasons why this won't be used as a unique ID. Who'd want to spend money implementing a system that would track people by their tires when they'll have such a poor accuracy?

      --
      boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse
    3. Re:uh... don't be dense by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Solution: Don't buy Michelin. If other tire manufacturers see Michelin lose market share because of this, they'll be sure NOT to follow.

    4. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical /.

      You read up to "Your rights..." and started typing.

      Had you managed to read the entire phrase, you might have picked up the word "Online" used in conjunction with a not particularly internet related invasion of privacy.

      Were they to add internet connectivity to their tires, you might have a point. However, no one on /. would care about your point since they'd be too busy talking about telneting to their tires, or creating a beowulf cluster of tires or hacking someone's tires and running the "deflate" program.

    5. Re:uh... don't be dense by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While humorous, RFID is one hell of a lot more reliable (on short spans) than OCR. It's also easy to embed it such that you can't tell it's there, while a camera can usually be noticed by the observant.

    6. Re:uh... don't be dense by bryanthompson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, now instead of having good origional ideas here, all you have to do is recycle the same 'this voilates our rights becuase .... ' mantra you hear on every post these days?

      not everything invades your privacy!

      Everything can be used for both good and bad, that is true, but I think in this case they're aiming for the good. Michelin isn't going to sell their database of tires to anyone. The only reason the article states for having the tracking numbers is to make it easier for recalls. They would have no reason for giving their database to 'the Man' so he could spy on you and see how often you travel from A to B.

    7. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They've got every reason to hand over the DB:

      TOTAL INFORMATION AWARENESS

      Sure, they might not 'choose' to do it, but they also probably won't have a choice.

    8. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If my car is parked in my windowsless garage, you don't know it's there due to it's license plate unless you set up cameras to track me to and from my garage.

      If my car is parked in my windowless garage with RFID tag, depending on the tag (and there are indeed several types), you can track it down.

      I am not anti-RFID. I just feel that if you are going to use the technology, the products should be clearly labelled. Let the consumer choose.

      btw, to the other tire companies out there, I will NOT be buying Michelins. Or any other tire company that I find out adds remote detection and sensing tags to their tires, whether announced or not. You want my business, keep the RFID or other easy remote sensing tire ID technology the hell away from my vehicle.

    9. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many RFID schemes are not self-powered. They get a broadcast signal and use that power to transmit back.

      An intelligent engineer may be able to set up driving routes to best map out all tires (and assumed corresponding cars), depending on the signal and tag, and map out accurately an area and the accompanying RFID tags. Worse, and this may not be actually possible, but it is conceivable, several single point strong broadcasts could also indicate, by analysis, similar results with much less effort.

    10. Re:uh... don't be dense by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      You car already HAS a unique identifier tacked on it, your liscence plate which is illegal to remove or alter.

      Yes, yes, we already have licence plates.... BUT does any corporation own the database of licence plates? I would hope that no one but a cop can pull up the info on my car. I trust the police much more than Michelin corporation...

      Incidentaly, it is probably legal to alter or fry these things... though that might change.

    11. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you car is "suddenly" equipt with five (don't forget the spare) transmitters that each broadcast a unique serial number in response to a promiscuously broadcasted request, well, that is "bad" from a privacy standpoint.

      OH MY GOD! They are tracking us! Anyone 15 feet away from me can find out where I am by tracking the signal the RFID puts out!

    12. Re:uh... don't be dense by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They would have no reason for giving their database to 'the Man' so he could spy on you and see how often you travel from A to B.

      Because "the man" asked them to. As flight schools had "no reason" to hand over their lists of students, as ISPs had "no reason" to hand over their customer info... Once the information exists, and law enforcement wants it, it can just ask for it, in these days with any or no excuse.

    13. Re:uh... don't be dense by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

      You are aware that the road, inwhich a reader could be inbeded, is less than 12 inches away from your tire?

    14. Re:uh... don't be dense by topham · · Score: 1

      I believe I read an article only 2 years ago about how cheap it was to buy the full license plate database from Texas motor vehicle department.

      (I think it was Texas, I could be mistaken.)

    15. Re:uh... don't be dense by syukton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no reason? No reason other than the limitless budget of the United States of America. They can write a cheque with more ones and zeroes than you'll find in your average intel CPU...Everything has a price; I think -you- are the one that needs to not be dense.

      I have a friend who used to be a telemarketer, and he used to tell me all kinds of fun stuff about their lists of phone numbers they'd have to call. They'd get lists of people who just had children born to them from the hospitals, so they can be called up and offered parenting magazine subscriptions. They'd get reports from police stations about illegal possession of firearms and then these people would be targeted for sales of "guns and ammo." If the hospitals and the police are already willing to sell their lists, what makes you think that something as "reputable" as a TIRE MANUFACTURER won't sell theirs? heh.

      Furthermore, although it is true that everything can be used for both good and bad, the greater likelihood is that it will be used for something bad or oppressive. The DMCA is a great example of what people initially thought would be a "good" law, but it turns out it prevents people from posting ads from newspapers on black friday and all other kinds of inane bullshit that the DMCA shouldn't even apply to.

      If you give those "in control" a way to more-efficiently or more-effectively "control" the ones they're "in control" of, they're going to use this new technology or method exhaustively "for the greater good" even if it walks all over our rights, because it holds the illusion of making their job easy or making a human system flawless. A human system by its nature will never be flawless, because it is human, but that doesn't mean that those "in power" or "in control" aren't lusting after a "perfect solution" which will put them in the position to watch everybody and make sure they behave.

      The more you take things like this lightly, the more you're letting your guard down. You need to believe that the only person that will protect you and your rights is yourself, and you need to believe that everybody else out there has wants and desires FOR or OF you which are completely counter to your own. Only by encountering all friends as enemies can you ensure that your personal privacy and security will be preserved.

      Question everything.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    16. Re:uh... don't be dense by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Put the tinfoil hat away and layoff the weed.

      All cars on the road today have little metal things attached to the bumpers commonly refered to as "license plates"

      These plates allow the police or anyone else to link you to a car with a unique VIN. All of the dangers of abuse that could take place with RFID exist already with license plates.

      I'm sure someone made the same argument against license place in the early 20th century, but the argument was lost in favor of public saftey and common sense.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    17. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that explains the sensors in the freeways. I thought they were just for speed and volume of traffic.

    18. Re:uh... don't be dense by SRMoore · · Score: 1

      All this is pure parinoia on your part. As it has already been stated all this information can be obtained from easy to identify numbers already on your car. Your licsense plate is already being read by vision systems in some states that can give you a ticket when you don't pay a toll, or you run a stop light. The is accessable on thedash through the windshield. In some states your emissions test has a barcode on it. So get over it, all this is is putting a serial number that can be easily read on a tire. (I belive there is already one on there.) This is more for, when you go get your car inspected they can see if your tires fall into a recall so they don't blow out on you and flip your explorer.

      Get over it.

    19. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't be trackable. I work with these kind of tags. Their read range is about 4 inches or 10 cm at best. They don't "broadcast" anything at all. They are completely passive, as are the ones that appear on Slashdot everynow and then eg. the recent one about putting them in clothes.

      It's nearly impossible to read these tags from any further away, unless you are in a large RF field, such as on a conveyer blet. These things are specially designed, and don't come cheap. So I doubt there are any privacy concerns.

      RFID is currently used to track trains in some areas, but it doesn't work too well. It has to use ACTIVE tags to gt the read up, but they are simply not durable enough. PASSIVE rfid tags have only a very small range, but are very durable, cheap and small.

      They're a good way for tracking things like tyres, where barcodes don't do so well.

    20. Re:uh... don't be dense by Technician · · Score: 1

      If you have to be paranoid, look at the spec for RFID. Get at detector for the radio signal. Maybe they will be added to the latest and greatest radar detectors.

      On the other hand, you could read the ID's in your own driveway. Only your car would enable the door opener. EG a stolen or spoofed door opener signal would not work.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    21. Re:uh... don't be dense by Enzondio · · Score: 1

      These plates allow the police or anyone else to link you to a car with a unique VIN. All of the dangers of abuse that could take place with RFID exist already with license plates.

      I don't think I'd agree with this. I believe the difference is in terms of application. For example, with the RFIDs authorities could embed scanners at every intersection (note that this eliminates the issue of range) that can be used to track any car. You cannot, obviously, post enough policemen at every corner to track every license plate that goes by.

      Obviously there are countless other ways that the RFIDs can be used that the license plate cannot. I won't go into them, so use your imagination.

      A couple other points I'd like to make. Many people have been discussing the various issues involved with using a part of the car that needs replacing to store the RFIDs in terms of them being used to track cars and how inefficient this is. I don't think the point of this is so much about tires specifically. The question is where else will these tags be embedded (in the car's frame for example. Or in clothing, which has been discussed here before) and what can be done with them then.

      Obviously this alone (RFIDs in tires, that is) is not a huge blow to privacy. A knee-jerk reaction is unwarranted however it is valuable to look at this in terms of a larger trend.

    22. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's interpret this:

      "Your rights are already being infringed on, therefore, further infringments are of no consequence."

    23. Re:uh... don't be dense by Hacker-at-Large · · Score: 1

      Get a grip guy...

      Nobody's going to spend the inordinate amount to put proximity readers on the roads. Besides, if you've ever used a prox card before, you'd also know how unlikely this is to work at highway speeds.

      The only thing the companies going to know is what tire they sold where and when and onto what car. It probably even means you can get warranty coverage without having the receipt.

      I guess you'd probably want to avoid "smash-and-grabs" at tire stores once you have a set. A prox reader might possibly fall against your tire and tell them it was you.

      When they put barcodes on my license plate, then I'll worry.

      Cheers!

    24. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In russia, your spare tire dosent encircle you,
      It unreasonably searchs YOU!

    25. Re:uh... don't be dense by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      This much is true, howeever there is an addiotnal problem. RFIDs are passive, not active transmitters, you must emit a signal, which they then modulate and emit back. To operate one you need ot have your transmaiiter and reciever within about 24 inches of the device. Now if you measure the size of an average wheel you'l realise that it is already looking at nearning the extreme of that, never mind the layers of pavement and so on that would seperate them. Then there is the problem of the fact that cars move. Very quickly. It's not easy to try and read these off a moving target (power vaires inversely with the aquare of distance) espically not one that regularly moves in excess of 30mph.

      I really think you'd have all hell trying to read RFID off cars. Even if they are stopped at an intersection it would be trickey at best, when they are moving I think it would be suprely impossable. Now compare that to the redlight cameras we have which do a great job of snapping liscence plates, ass OCR, mix and shake and you have a great ID system.

    26. Re:uh... don't be dense by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Ummm, I've never seen RFID technology that operates at distances of greater than about 24 inches. Likewise, I've never seen a garage where there is that little clearence between the door and the car.

      You have to remember that there are some real ractical limits on these things. They are not active transmitters, they are passive modulators. They recieve an RF signal, modulate it, and relect the modulated signal back. You start to need powerful RF signals and very sturdy circuits to try this at longer distances.

    27. Re:uh... don't be dense by th1nk · · Score: 1

      If systems (toll booths etc?) start using this data for any purpose...

      Toll Booth Guy: That will be $152., $2 for the toll and $150 since your average speed since the last toll booth was 75mph.

    28. Re:uh... don't be dense by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      There are alot of potentially good aspects to RFID -- like taxing road users instead of the general public.

      The concept of RFID is the same as a license plate, only a more convenient application.

      My point is, if someone wants to track you -- they already can.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    29. Re:uh... don't be dense by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      How about "that car is owned by a white person" listing getting your black roomate killed for borrowing your car?

      Cops are trained to kill black people, thanks for helping get the word out.

      PS. Any of you that have the tollway ID chip so you don't have to stop on the toll road automatically have to be quiet. Sure, those only track you while on the tollway, but who's to say there's not an evil gov'mt plot already in place to install sensors around town to see where else you go? Those read at 20 yards, RFID is at 20 inches.

    30. Re:uh... don't be dense by praedor · · Score: 1

      REALLY? Michellin wont sell my personal data to anyone? Ever? Businesses are sooooo nice! They NEVER violate privacy with keystroke loggers, never listen in on phonecalls, read emails...and they never ever sell database information (nor would they want to) to other businesses or marketing firms. The money to be made by doing so is NO inducement in that regard.


      What country do you live in that businesses are 100% ethical, never do wrong, never screw anyone for $$? I want to live there.


      The INTENT is reasonable but that does not mean be sanguine about it. Whenever any such tracking method is introduced it MUST be thoroughly vetted and reviewed and any and ALL possible misuses of this power nipped in the bud BEFORE there is a smoking gun to drive posthumus nipping.


      ALL such technologies must be vetted for possible privacy violations. This sort of concern is what drove the adoption of privacy policies with many businesses and sites. They wouldn't have had any compunction about selling YOUR data if people did not get crazy about it beforehand.


      It is better to prevent abuse before actual abuse occurs. You cannot regain your privacy once your data is broadcast to everyone under the sun.


      The potential abuse of RFIDs need to be examined and rules/laws enacted to PREVENT abuse, not react to it.


      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    31. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean, radial profiling?

    32. Re:uh... don't be dense by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      Yep, all your info is available for "cheap" at the DMV. Ever renew your plates, and then get junk mail a month later dealing with car insurance, etc?

      All this, just so you "only" have to spend $200 on new plates.

    33. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I trust the police much more than Michelin corporation...
      Any reason? Has the Michelin man attacked your family and emptied your fridge?
    34. Re:uh... don't be dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bravo!! good job. chip implant is were it will all lead to.

  40. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm what? RFID tags have a range of about 5 meters and are powered via induction from the tag reader.

    None of the things he mentioned are possible.

    How on earth did this get +2 insightful?

  41. They are talking about by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    There are talking of adding RF monitors of temperature and preasure. All we need is some way to disable the unique ID transmission.

  42. Other Rubber Things with RFIDs by be-fan · · Score: 1

    Coming Soon! Condoms with RFIDs, for those annoying paternity suits!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  43. this is good news for those who live in teh ghetto by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    now tires can be identified as stolin just by a cop pointing an instument at them.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  44. No Problem by slugo3 · · Score: 1

    just microwave your tires on the high setting for 60 seconds

    1. Re:No Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but my tires don't fit in there. Got any better ideas?

      anjotoes

  45. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friend, you are very true. I, being Christian (call me religious or whatever you want to), have no doubt that this verse in the Bible will come true very soon :

    Revelation 13:
    16 -> He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to recieve a mark on his right hand or on his forehead,
    17 -> so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

    Mark these words... The technology for such a mark is being developed rapidly these days, and the complete invasion of privacy is inevitable IMO.

    ---insignia----

  46. It'd be great if it was Firestone... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd be all for this if it were Firestone. That way, when my tire goes, they'll be able to identify my body.

  47. I don't think this addresses the right problem by muertos · · Score: 1

    What I would like to see, is an RFID in a tire, along with a small amount of explosive and an RF detonator. That way, when someone acts like a nitwit in traffic, you can blow their tires. If you like, you can even warn them before you do it.

  48. Piracy by lunartik · · Score: 1

    As this type of technology becomes cheaper you are going to see a lot of this type of stuff. Not because corporations give a shit about where you drove your Michelins, but rather as protection against piracy and theft of items that get knocked off or stolen with great frequency. Piracy (not trading MP3s or warez, but counterfeit goods) is a huge business that a lot of companies are looking to counter in some way.

  49. Re:Me too by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

    Seems like we give up personal freedoms and anonymity for the sake of convenience these days. Next will come the cashless society where every purchase can be tracked.

    --
    When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
  50. Re:Because the RFID can be read by remote sensors. by dabraun · · Score: 1

    Last I checked every car had a lisence plate that was pretty easy to read - via automated cameras and relatively simple OCR software - this is nothing new. If they really want to know you went through the toll booth they can already find out (Canada has highways that operate this way, billing users by scanning their plates and sending them a periodic bill in the mail)

    Not that Canada is exactly a bastion of liberty - but the point is that this doesn't really enable any new privacy "problems"

    David

  51. Are you smoking crack? by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is an RFID in your tire an invasion of privacy? First, it's a serial number, period. Even IF the serial is associated with a VIN, still, how is it an invasion of privacy? How does this challenge your rights to privacy?

    Oooh, someone is going to walk up to your car and KNOW what the serial number of the Michelin tire you bought is.

    Seriously, I see this as GOOD. If there is an association of VIN to serial number then the police can track YOUR stolen car when the thieves strip it.

    People need to get off the RFID kick. My CAT has an RFID. By itself it's nothing, but because that RFID serial is linked to my name in the issuer's database, I will get my cat back if he gets lost.

    People need people need to understand RFID != privacy invasion.

    1. Re:Are you smoking crack? by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      So, even if, unbeknownst to you, some corporation or government entity imbeds readers into road surfaces to track traffic movement by individual, or compile lists of say, all of the people who frequent certain stores or merchants in your town, you still have no problem? Even if that information is compiled in a database with other more useful information, you have no problem with that? Please. You either A) Don't understand data mining as it exists today, or B) Are one of those people who think they have nothing to hide, so that constitutional provision barring unreasonable search is unnecessary. Your life's an open book. You don't care if some quasi-governmental agency such as the FDA can monitor what fast-food restaraunts you frequent and then sell that data to insurance companies to adjust your risk rate and raise your premium on life insurance, do you?
      Of course you wouldn't. You also wouldn't mind if your insurance company placed surveillance cameras in your bathroom just to assist your safety either. I mean, it's for the children, right? What if little Timmy slips in the tub. Silent but quick, the FBI could notify your pediatrician that you are on your way, or summon an ambulance. More likely they would use the footage to make the case that you were not a watchful parent and take your kids to a federal orphanage. Train them for military service, maybe. Sure, most of this is absurd now, but if history teaches anything, it's that times change WAY faster than anybody ever suspected. Does apathy really pervade our society such that these scenarios, enacted in baby steps, can be a reality?

    2. Re:Are you smoking crack? by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 1

      You don't understand how RFIDs work. They have a transmission range of less than
      1 centimeter. They will NOT be embedded in the tread, so you'd need a reader
      right next to the bead in the sidewall.

      The "threat" is minimal.

    3. Re:Are you smoking crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the RFID 'kick' is really about RFIDs becoming so prevalent that everything has an RFID.

      How is this possible? By technology, improvements, and economies of scale. As RFIDs get more accepted, the effort into dropping their cost will increase and result in even cheaper, better RFIDs. This is not hard to grasp. This in turn makes it cheap to put them in everything.

      You chose to get your cat RFID'd. You may not in the future. 5 years from now, if your cat is stick kicking, you buy a new cat collar, mouse-chaser may be RFID'd for you. Hell, how long before they make this consumable; your cat food has RFIDs (scary) and they can backtrack it to your credit card.

      I'm not against RFIDs. But I'd rather have a CHOICE in the matter. Michelins having RFIDs means I can buy something else, but that is only effective IFF the competitor's products aren't RFID'd. There are no regulations stating they must labelled their products as being tagged to the consumer right now. So I may not know or have a choice.

    4. Re:Are you smoking crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if they can hack into the DMV database and match your tired RFID with your VIN number, then they'll be able to get your license plate number! Duh.

    5. Re:Are you smoking crack? by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Ok, I recant my rant. However, many RFID units work at a range more like 10 feet, such as those built by Transcore /Amtech..

    6. Re:Are you smoking crack? by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those have large patch antennas built into them. Like the FastPath
      cards and such.

  52. Tire pressure monitors. by jammer · · Score: 1

    For the folks who are posting about tire pressure monitors: as has been said, they're already available in some cars.

    Generally, but AFAIK not exclusively, this is done on cars that come stock with run-flat tires. It's possible to have a run-flat go flat and not notice it at all, especially if cruising on the highway. Running on a flat run-flat for extended lengths of time will destroy them.

    Therefore, on cars with runflats you get tire pressure monitoring systems. Not paying the $150 for it isn't an option, unless you want to stand a good risk of messing up your (expensive) tires should you ever get a flat.

    You can also buy a stand-alone kit from Tire Rack, as someone else on this thread linked to.

  53. Re:Me too by atrus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think you know what RFID is. RFID is a very small chip with no power source of its own. When it comes close to a specialized broadcaster, the chip will be powered via. induction and broadcast a small tiny ID signal back. Your Range Rover probably has a commercial satelite service called OnStar, which is a very different thing than RFID.

  54. Finding stolen rims by AgentStarks · · Score: 1

    Maybe this way I could track down the bastard that jacked my girlfriends rims...

  55. the technology factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found an article that discusses this technology in depth on scientific america. Heres a snipped url. VERY interesting!

    http://snurl.com/mm7

    The uses planned for some aspects of this technology are frightning.

  56. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Government tells women what they can and can't do with their own bodies all the time (abortion)"

    That is a very different (and pro abortion viewpoint) issue.

    The government involvement with abortion is whether or not that governing body recognises the baby as a seperate entity or not.

    In which case we have:

    Pro Abortion: It is a part of the mother's body and she can do as she wishes. (No restriction on what the person does to their own body)

    Against Abortion: The baby is a seperate entity from the mother. The mother is given all rights due to a guardian (Which does not include killing them).(No restriction on what the person does to their own body)

    The point of this is that you will find that laws governing what you can do to your own body (eg: mandatory tagging) are a seperate issue.

  57. RFID FAQ by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since a lot of ppl are asking a lot of the same questions about RFID devices, I thought I'd answer some here.

    More information can be had from Microchip, a leading manufacturer of RFID devices. A lot of this information is coming from their RFID Design Guide

    1. What is an RFID tag?
    An RFID tag is a very small microcontroller and radio transmitter/receiver. They typically consist of a single chip and a single coil which behaves as an antenna.

    2. What does an RFID tag transmit?
    Most RFID tags transmit a single large integer number, unique to that individual tag. A serial number, if you will. Some RF tags also have a very small amount of ROM/EEPROM, and so could transmit a little more info and can even be reprogrammed by the "reader".

    3. How are they powered?
    The RFID "reader" device emits RF energy. The RFID tag receives this energy and uses it to power itself. It's a lot like an old AM crystal radio. The device transmits its number over and over at a very high bps for a high level of data redundancy.

    There is a whole shitload more technical modulation theory and stuff that goes on here which I'm leaving out. If you aren't a ham or other radio type person it would probably be meaningless. Again if you would like more info, look here.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:RFID FAQ by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Informative

      4. From how far away can the tag be read?
      The typical range is a few feet, a la Mobil SpeedPass or tollbooth EZPass. Think about how often you come within a few feet of something that could secretly house an RFID tag reader... The THEORETICAL range limit is a few feet PLUS line-of-sight. A high gain antenna on the reader could read tags from a great distance away, just like your Pringles can 802.11 antenna.

      5. Aren't RF tags already on all kinds of stuff as an anti theft measure?
      No. The RF tags at BestBuy are not ID tags. They don't have a serial number in them. They are ON or OFF. Take one out if you don't belive me, it's just a strip of metal, just like in library books. They are not active devices. An RFID tag is a COMPUTER with RAM and ROM and a data radio.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:RFID FAQ by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Some RF tags also have a very small amount of ROM/EEPROM, and so could transmit a little more info and can even be reprogrammed by the "reader".

      Now this sounds like fun. Wait 'till these are hacked to get free gas and free tolls! It sounds like most of the necessary equipment is already there...

      I wonder if the first person arrested for this will spend as much time in the slammer before their trial as Kevin Mitnick?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:RFID FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those tags at best buy are not RFID tags. They are anti theft strips. Those strips are just maginitezed strips, that trigger that annoying siren that goes off when you leave the store. (because the cashier is too lazy to demag the whole box you just bought)

    4. Re:RFID FAQ by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Can someone please answer number 6?

      6. Can they be easy destroyed or jammed?

    5. Re:RFID FAQ by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      6. Can they be easy destroyed or jammed?
      Jammed, sure. You just need to transmit on the thing's frequency with enough power.
      Destroyed? Probably. A strong enough RF pulse should do the trick. A microwave would also probably induce enough current in it to fry the chip. Actually a strong enough RF could also destroy the reader!

      Of course consider the legal and practical aspects of both courses of action. The FCC takes a very dim view of all jamming activities, and it would be quite simple for anyone with radio experience to track down the source of the jamming signal (IE you.) Tracking an instantanious RF pulse is much more difficult and they'd have to be listening specifically for it, but they could do it.

      Your best bet for destroying it is probably to use a microwave, or if it doesn't fit in the microwave take a microwave apart and use the microwave gun.

      Disclaimer: DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME! I am not recommending or suggesting that I or anybody else should or will take any of the aforementioned actions. I cannot be held liable for you burning off your retinas with a microwave gun, or for any other injuries or legal action that may result from doing any of the things I've mentioned. I want to keep my ham radio license.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    6. Re:RFID FAQ by enigma32 · · Score: 1

      So, to what degree are these things programmable?

      I mean, Is it possible to change the ID that it emits? or just some other random data that it can be programmed to tell you?

      It sure could be interesting to build a little reprogrammer that plugs into your Palm Pilot, then go around repogramming peoples' tires =)

  58. They're not the only ones.... by Univac_1004 · · Score: 1

    ...who want to give privacy a close shave. check out Gillette

  59. Nothing to worry about by Jasonp55 · · Score: 1

    OK, this is retarded. There's nothing to worry about. ALL tire companies are required to do this, up until now, it's been done with paper. Michelin is switching to this new RFID system because they are less dificult to put on, last the life of the tire, and other information can be stored on it. Also, this only applies to OE tires, there are no plans to include this on replacement tires. About privacy concerns, why the hell would anyone be worried about tacking where tires have been? It would be extremely difficult, expensive, require the colaboration of many different people, and be completely useless to anyone--yeah, I bet toll road owners are rushing to install this. Michelin is switching because it is an easier way to comply with the law. All tire companies have been after this--a RFID tag which can be cured in rubber--and I expect to see all tire companies (Good Year, and Firestone included) switch to these RFID tags very soon. See? Nothing to worry about.

  60. Re:Me too by Zebbers · · Score: 1

    since u don't know shit about what you are driving, can I have your RR?

    Unless you run out of gas on a highway running through your dealers garage, your SOL.

    RFID != Onstar, or any other sat service.

    Jesus

  61. Thanks, I'll join :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    count me in.

  62. I actually don't mind this much.... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Here's why.

    First of all, privacy's not really a big issue in this instance A good portion of driving happens on public roadways already -- where one is obligated to have the car's license plates plainly visible (which can, all by themselves, be used as identifying information). This coupled with the necessity of the ability to produce a valid drivers license and vehicle registration where circumstances warrant shows that a person doesn't really have much right to privacy while driving anyways.

    Secondly, identifying arbitrary individuals with this would be like finding a needle in a haystack (more specifically, like getting one particular needle out of a haystack made of almost identical needles).

    Besides... the usefulness that technology like this would have for being able to track stolen vehicles is obvious.

    Oh, I do agree with the original poster on the point that embedding tire gauges into tires would be a really cool feature.

  63. scary ass sheot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found an article that discusses this technology in depth on scientific america. Heres a snipped url. VERY interesting! article here The uses planned for some aspects of this technology are frightning.

  64. Only the Wackos Will Let This Bother Them by reallocate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only three kinds of people will let this change their behavior:

    1. The truly paranoid
    2. The truly criminal
    3. People whose self-esteem rests on believing that everyone but them is crooked and evil.

    People can surveil you anywhere you go, your car can be identified in commercial satellite imagery, the grocery knows what you buy, the phone company knows who you call, the cable company knows what TV programs you watch, and your ISP knows what web sites you visit and who gets your email.....and now you're upset?

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Only the Wackos Will Let This Bother Them by EllF · · Score: 1

      Just because the consumer is already being fucked in the ass does not mean he needs to roll over and pretend to enjoy it, too. The fact that a good number of privacy invasions are already taking place is entirely unrelated to this one, aside (perhaps) from the fact that this is yet one more reason to be outraged.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
    2. Re:Only the Wackos Will Let This Bother Them by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Grease me up, Scotty!
      On another note, In Soviet Russia, YOU monitor TIRES!

    3. Re:Only the Wackos Will Let This Bother Them by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Sattelites in the commercial sector have 1-meter to 0.5 meter resolution. That means something 3 feet by three feet is one to two pixels wide. I doubt that you can identify or track a vehicle from low-earth orbit either.
      I'm not paranoid, I know that this is more to track the tires than the owner. Really, I do. The reason so many people are against similar technologies becoming so widely adopted is that it is easily used for other purposes by those less benevolent. Ah, screw LESS benevolent, I am afraid even of those in power equally benevolent to myself. Lets face it, if I could exploit some weakness in the system and gain money or power from it, I would. So would many of those in power. Sure, not all of them are bad eggs, but all it took in Germany was a few.

    4. Re:Only the Wackos Will Let This Bother Them by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      Only three kinds of people will let this change their behavior:

      Do you honestly mean to support the moral value of social control based on your evaluations of the type of people who might resist that control? Do you understand that you've relegated the idea of individual rights to stereotype? What does freedom look like in your universe?

  65. Is there some sort of volume tire licensing? by TermAnnex · · Score: 1

    Changing more than 3 tires will change your vehicle's license number, and you will have to reinsure your vehicle.

  66. Hmm... by di0s · · Score: 1

    Wonder if they're only on automobile tires. I'll be damned if I'm going to give up the Pilot Sports. Best motorcycle tire by far. Even if they did implant RFIDs in them, they'd probably go haywire at 150+ MPH when I ride with my friends.

  67. RFID tags are a voluntary technology only? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    It seems to me that RFID tags are like GPS: They are a voluntary technology. GPS is easily jammed, and RFID tags are easily destroyed by overloading them with energy at their resonant frequency.

    So, if they present a privacy invasion, they will simply be destroyed.

    RFID tags could be jammed, also. Your Honda could be rigged to say it has 34 tires purchased in Brazil.

  68. Time and Distance by Xarin · · Score: 1

    It would also make automating speeding tickets a lot easier. Just calcualate the time and distance between sensors and automatically generate a speeding ticket.

    1. Re:Time and Distance by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      Bingo, I was scanning down to see if anybody would catch this.

      As many people have noted, just having the tag inside the tire wouldn't identify you in itself, but "They" already have license-plate camera systems. Combine it with a pair of sensors separated by a hundred feet of road, and you have a totally undetectable, fully automated, highly reliable speed trap.

      The only real problem would be the well-known "it wasn't me driving" argument, but they can easily address that with a wave of the legislative wand.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  69. car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you imagine if the car scanned/logged the tires also. Imagine the car not starting if you have mismached tires. Or if the car would not go over the max rated speed of the tire. Or even the car not starting at all if there was a recall (Think onstar for net connectivty) on the tires you currently are driving on. Or the car turining you in for speeding. This is all looking out for _your_ safty. (ha, heavy scarsim) C'mon, Im a grown up. I handle myself. You dont wory about me. can we stop this monitoring crap , now I have to carry around a GPS jammer and a RFID jammer. America home of the free.

  70. "They could just read your plate!" by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    At most major intersections these days they lay wires in the pavement. You can see the grooves they cut for them. Do you think they REALLY turn the light green? It would be relatively inexpensive for a city to use those wires (or similar wires) to read the RFID tag in EVERY SINGLE TIRE THAT GOES THROUGH THAT INTERSECTION, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. You think someone is just going to write those all down?

    They could place scanners every 1/4 mile along the interstate and read the tag as your car drives by at 80mph. You're telling me someone could just read your plate in THAT situation?

    Any place where there's pavement they could embed readers in it. You're tires are closer than 24 inches to the ground most of the time.

    Maybe at tollbooths they could just read your plate, but if they use tollbooths to read your plate AND corrolate it to your tire IDs, then they can track you almost anywhere anytime. Of course many tollbooths ALREADY are equipped with EZPasses. There's voluntary tracking for you.

    To everyone who said "if they're close enough to scan your tires they could just read your plate", think harder.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  71. Hazard? by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

    Could this be used to pop tires?

    Ya, I know someone close enough could just knife 'em, but for some reason I'm envisioning a whole bunch going at once, perhaps the result of military testing like what was setting off those car alarms...

    --
    "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
  72. What this is being used for by it_atheist · · Score: 1

    This is primarily being taken up by the material handling industry as a means of stock/inventory movement and control. Its primary purpose is finished once the tyre is installed in your car. (Return visits to the manufacturer or an agent not withstanding). Any usage whilst the product is attached to your car is just a bonus (or a problem depending upon your point of view). In the next few years you should expect to see RFID chips in anything that currently displays a barcode including clothes, shoes underwear etc etc. Gillette has ordered half a million of these chips - if it's cheap enough to slap on a razor, it's cheap enough to slap on just about anything. As another thought, one of the primary VCs of "Alien Technology" (I'm too lazy to track down the URL) - the firm that's leading the pack here and incidentally the firm used by Gillette - is one of the worlds largest barcoding and labeling companies. Food for thought. (Hey, even those annoying individual stickers on apples could have a chip in them - that really is food for thought)

  73. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by ewhac · · Score: 1

    This is happening slowly, but SURELY. In 2010 Slashdot will have articles such as "ChildTracker-2000(TM) is now a mandatory installation at all Hospitals in the United States(C). All newborns will be protected with a tiny chip installed under their skin in the palm of their hand."

    And then, in about three decades:

    "Capricorn 14. Year of The City 2040. Carousel begins..."

    :-),
    Schwab

  74. VIN IS ON WINDSHIELD ALREADY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so i don't need to scan your damn tires

  75. Root Cause Analysis Suggests otherwise by Cerlyn · · Score: 1

    I took a week-long root cause analysis class which centered itself around the Firestone/Ford issue. Mind you, I'm not going to repeat the whole procedure here; you can look it up yourself.

    Our class' conclusion (mind you, obviously biased) that a combination of things was at fault. While Firestone took the fallout, it was possibly Ford (or both) with the blame.

    Interesting things to note (pardon me if I screw up some of these):

    • All the tire failures/rollovers happened in the Southern US during the Summertime, and in other areas with high temperatures.
    • All failures occurred when there was only a single passenger in the car. In all the rollover cases, there was nothing substational in the trunk as well.
    • The model of SUV that was rolling over had a higher-than-average center of gravity even among SUV's. As mentioned in the news many times recently, SUVs in general are more likely to roll over due to their high center of gravity, and the model in question being even higher than the SUV average did not help it either.
    • Assembling a tire involves multiple types of rubber+metal (for the radials). Putting together a tire involves "blind" assemblies of various types of rubber along with the radial belt, preventing inspection various assembly steps to verify they were done properly. And of course, various types of materials (when forced together) like to seperate apart and/or react chemically over time, especially with extreme temperatures.
    • Deflating a tire (as Ford suggested) to prevent it from imploding/exploding actually may be the wrong thing to do. Studies suggest underinflated tires are more likely to implode/go flat/etc.
    • The only tire ever to implode in all of the cases was the front, driver's-side(?) tire. (I'm not sure which one, but it was always the same.)

    That's all I'll say on the topic. IANACE (Car Expert), so I'll leave the nitty-gritty details to the professionals. The only humorous thing I'll mention is that shop dealers tell me it is the richest people who tend to ask for the cheapest tires; "What do you mean my $40,000+ super-expensive convertable requires a $300+ set of tires?"

    1. Re:Root Cause Analysis Suggests otherwise by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      What??
      All failures occurred when there was only a single passenger in the car. In all the rollover cases, there was nothing substational in the trunk as well.
      Then how did whole families die in some of the rollovers?

      And where did you get the "implode" aspect? They disintegrated from the excessive heat created by underinflation/overloading. The hot summer asphalt took things past the threshold.

      Ford never suggested "deflating" a tire. Apparently they did recommend lower-than-normal operating pressures, and there is still debate over whose fault that is. However, I'll guarantee that every single tire that failed did so due to overheating (see above reasons).

      I'm still surprised the lawyers haven't sued the asphalt crews and the local weathermen, but it's still early.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  76. Time to Switch by 1stflight · · Score: 1

    What a time to have to go back to Firestones..

  77. how difficult is it to destroy such a chip ... ? by hazzzard · · Score: 1

    ... without destroying the tire. Has anybody done this? Could you please build a tiny-chip-destruction device (9-Volt battery, antenna, some circuit?) and then post the pictures and construction manuals on the web. We'll be happy to slashdot you... ;-)

  78. Goddamn imbedded microcontrollers by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

    I just bought some new tires. Anybody here who can tell me how to get my slackware install to work? I need a new microkernel for a PIC 16F877. I don't need any X-windows since I can't seem to find any display other than these letters on the sidewall. I just need a little help from the TireBox Linux crowd- would Mandrake be a better choice? I've got that on my Toast-R-Oven.

  79. all the prophecies comming true step by step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everything that has been written in various prophecies or ancient rumours and hopi, inka, mayan and other stuff is falling into places...

    when will people start to see the big picture...

    this world cant escape whats been foreseen...

  80. Infringement Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dear Mr Bloggs

    Our records indicate that you have neglected to rotate your tyres in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. As this is in violation with state safety requirements, your second credit card (1253-2653-7533-6643) has been debited the standard fee of $200.00.

    As a complimentary service, we have not deited your first credit card (5633-1343-5544-2342) as your recent purchase of sex toys from BigBum Emporium last thursday has taken you close to your credit limit on that card.

    Also note that your listening to an auauthorised track from 'Eminem's Greatest Hits' last thursday night has been noted and forwarded to out appropriate department.

    As a regular user of our infringement services, we would like to offer you membership of our elite Gold Violater's Club. Membership has many benefits for the frequent offender, as outlined in the brochures currently deposited in your three email accounts.

  81. Guess I'm lucky by _The_boz_ · · Score: 1

    I guess my days of buying road hazard insurance for only one tire is gone...

  82. Just one more step by john_is_war · · Score: 1

    oh great, they can use to track speeding.
    This is just another step towards them trying to stop people from speeding. First they have cops on patrol. Then they have air tracking. Then they check times with EZPass. Next they time the amount of time it takes to go througha security camara. And now this! They have gone too far in trying to keep people from speeding! This is the last straw... AGAIN!

    --
    Live life to the fullest. It's not that life is short, but that you are dead for so long.
  83. Inductive loops in highways/roads can do this by Radi-0-head · · Score: 2, Informative

    My parents live in a rather hoity-toity neighborhood, where access is tightly controlled. Each non-manned entry gate is equipped with inductive loops embedded in the street. These read a device which is magnetically attached underneath a resident's vehicle by the homeowner's association. The device is a hard plastic capsule that is riveted to a metal backing. There are two VERY strong magnets (like the type found in hard disk acutators) that keep this contraption stuck to the bottom of the car. When a resident drives their car up to the gate, it opens automatically.

    There is a computer within the security center that logs entries and exits and can also be used to revoke access (say someone steals the device/car/etc.).

    Recently, the City of San Diego embarked on a major project to "upgrade" the traffic sensor loops at controlled intersections. There are now additional loops about 50 yards before each intersection, which are typically run into a 4-ft. cabinet at the side of the road.

    These have also been mysteriously installed on some roads where there are no traffic signals. Yes, I realize the primary purpose of these devices would most likely be to meter traffic speed and flow, but imagine if the police wanted to keep tabs on a certain individual and thus placed one of these devices on a suspect's car, allowing them to be traced at every intersection, freeway on/off ramp, and even along smaller highways.

    Definitely interesting stuff.

  84. Some Points on Effectiveness by mmol_6453 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some points:

    First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment. First you'd have to be able to single out the license plate text from that of the neighboring car, or a road sign, or even a piece of litter tumbling across your Line-of-Sight.

    Second, the only reason to have such live OCR would be for aid in automating vehicle tracking. While the ACLU (or international counterparts) would be quick to try to plaster attention over this, people already consider it common.

    Third, searches through public databases take time. It's not like they'll be able to identify you the moment their computer gets a lock on your identifying characteristic. Local caching would be prohibitively expensive for your average police department, no matter what the size of the city.

    Fourth, there's really no range limit on how far away you could detect these things. Your effective range depends on the power being broadcasted at, and the sensitivity of your instruments. It being a digital signal makes the matter a heck of a lot easier.

    Fifth, it might be possible to fry the RFID device by feeding it so much RF power that its circuitry melts. (I know I'd certainly try if I had tires or clothing that had these devices. I'd go park next to a high-power radio tower for a few hours.) There'd certainly be a market in devices capable of high-power directional transmissions. The devices are probably already illegal.

    Sixth, the government is going to have a hell of a time passing laws prohibiting unlicensed transfer of RFID-enabled devices. And I can tell you that laws regulating the sales and transfers of something so common as tires (and, later, clothing, shoes, etc.).

    Seventh, if you need an alibi, intentionally broadcast one of your RFIDs at, say, forty watts. (Talk about getting around a lot!) Or just send someone driving around with your RFID clothing, or driving around in your car.

    Eighth, 1984 should have been titled 2005. People don't take it seriously because the things it predicted didn't happen by 1984.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by mlyle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A few points about RFID.

      RFID is parasitically powered from the interrogating device. Powering it from a long way away on a moving target seems hard.

      Also, you'd need to be able to distinguish from multiple transmissions on the same frequency to recover the serial number. A very high gain antenna (parabolic dish) still has a beamwidth of >= 2 degrees. Being able to power the RFID devices from more than 10 feet away, and also receive the return signal, without giving everyone cataracts from the microwave exposure seems like a hard problem.

      Most RFID systems are not truely RF based, but are magnetically/inductively coupled at a relatively low frequency. These are not going to have any kind of range at all, and a high gain "antenna" (directional electromagnet) would be huge.

      Finally, vehicles move. Even a speedy RFID tag that transmits at 12kbps takes 1/46th of a second to send a typical 256 bit message (serial number + checksum + overhead). It takes 5-6 times this in practice to power the tag, interrogate it, and receive a response, in which time the car has moved >10ft at 60MPH. So even if you could have an ultra-high-gain antenna, it'd have to be significantly steerable, too.

      I'm not very worried. Compared to a license plate/VIN this is nothing.

    2. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment

      They're called 'eyes'. :o)

    3. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by topham · · Score: 1

      Forget about the problem of multiple devices. They use a protocol that works fine with lots of them.

      I believe they use something similar to the protocol used by 1-wire devices from Dallas Semiconductor. (modified for RF use, but same basic concept).

      Demonstrations of RFID use have previously involved shiopping carts full of product, you push the cart through a scanner and in a second or so it has a complete list of all the id's in the cart.

    4. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by mlyle · · Score: 1

      Yes, assuming the different RFID devices can hear each other.

      However, I assume they don't have directional antennas that greatly increase the range beyond the specified 24" to hear each other now, do they?

    5. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2, Informative
      First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment.
      Obviously it's a waste of money to put OCR in the car when the officer can read the giant reflective letters just as well with his own two eyes. I think the poster's point was that it would be an astronomical waste of effort to scan the RFID in someone's tire with a bunch of special equipment, when you could just read the licence plate number: it's already linked to your VIN, and your drivers licence, vehicle registration, etc.

      Second, the only reason to have such live OCR would be for aid in automating vehicle tracking. While the ACLU (or international counterparts) would be quick to try to plaster attention over this, people already consider it common.
      You could make the same argument about the RFID; there's nothing saying what either technology will or won't be used for

      Third, searches through public databases take time. It's not like they'll be able to identify you the moment their computer gets a lock on your identifying characteristic. Local caching would be prohibitively expensive for your average police department, no matter what the size of the city.
      It takes maybe 5 seconds to run someone's plate if there's a laptop in the cruiser, otherwise maybe 20 seconds to read the plate over the radio and get the details from dispatch (this is why cops in precincts without laptops will follow you for a block before pulling you over). I don't see why an automated device would take longer than an officer. It would take much longer to search a database of RFIDs, since ther would be 5x as many records

      Your other points are very valid, I just wanted to clarify those first three: for close-range, it's much easier to get someone's plate, and if they're parked, their VIN.

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    6. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by mlyle · · Score: 1

      I should have taken a moment more to mention tree arbitration schemes, like Maxim's one-wire protocol. Yes, these exist, but they would require the handshake that i discussed to read the data from the RFID tag to take even longer than I cited.

      Keep in mind Michelin made a breakthrough to make this thing work 24" for only one stationary device. Is big brother gonna instantly have a system that can make this work over 10's of feet for many devices moving at high speed?

    7. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by topham · · Score: 1

      No.

      It isn't relevent if the RFIDs can hear each other.

      Basic idea (from memory)
      Transmit a 1 and listen for a response.
      If you get a response then transmit 11, listen again...

      if you don't get a response, transmit 10 and listen for a response...

      as you increase the number of bits you identify a specific tag (sooner or later you only have 1 possible tag left). Then, after querying that tag you turn it off. And do the sequencingain.

      (Keep track of the failures from above, they can be used to speed the search).

      All tis could be readily combined with in-road sensors, etc. I'm not generally a fan of paranoia of this type, but I don't see any particular reason to leave a functioning RFID in my tire.

      I'd hate to get yank off the road because the previous owner of a tire had a criminal record.) (Yes, people do buy used tires.)

    8. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by TheFlamingoKing · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm assuming you've never walked out to a parking lot and found your car on blocks...

      I'd leave the RFIDs if it meant I could catch that bitch.

    9. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by cuteintern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree- Your license plate is easier to access, especially at 65 mph. As far as dealerships, since tire theft is a problem, the ability to prove a tire came from a specific car (on a specific lot) would make criminal prosecution much easier. And as far as criminal prosecution goes, if someone stole my Michelins (and, likely, the nice rims they were mounted on) I would want every chance to track the tires and prove they were mine.

    10. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment.

      IDK about police cars, but over here (.nl), the police have been experimenting with a stationary OCR system. The experiment involved checking everyone's average speed over a 3-km stretch of highway (read licence plates at beginning and end, calculate time between passages).

    11. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Actually, OCR like that is just months off...there's a company (been on /., do a search on the PDA section) which is making software which allows you to take a shot with your PDA camera of a (chinese) street sign, and the software will translate it into english. Programming software to search out and lock on to something with the characteristics of a licenseplate seems rather trivial to do, as licence plates are a known size and shape.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    12. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment.
      I heard about police cars equipped with policemen (equipped with eyes), though. Eyes usually do a pretty good job as OCR devices.

      --
      blah
    13. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to post this as an AC for certain reasons, but a company I "know about" has a contract with the Chinese government, tracking every automobile entering and exiting the country.

      They are also finishing a product to track Indy/F1 cars, which I assure you move faster than 60mph.

      While range may be a limitation, transmission speed is not. Neither is hiding transmitters (backscatter) or placing them in bottlenecks. (tunnels, bridges)

      I've also worked with a company that has the ability to embed RFID tags with a PRINTER. The specific application mentioned was currency.

      In 30 years, this WILL be ubiqitous. God help us. I'll be retiring in a third world country, thank you very much.

    14. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by botik32 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      RFID is parasitically powered from the interrogating device. Powering it from a long way away on a moving target seems hard.

      Well, today it seems hard. But once it gets ubiquitous, what stops Michelin (or any other company) from refining the technology?

      Even if it has some good uses like tracking stolen tires, this seems to me like another "good intention" paving the road to hell...

      Besides, there are other ways to secure your tires. Like: screw one round bolt with a hole in it so only you can remove it.

      Finally, I'd rather get my wheels stolen than live in a country where all my moves are tracked.

    15. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment. First you'd have to be able to single out the license plate text from that of the neighboring car, or a road sign, or even a piece of litter tumbling across your Line-of-Sight.

      Congestion chargingin London starts soon, cameras read your car number plate, if you don't pay five pounds (~$7.50)for entering London (details in article) you get in trouble.

    16. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment.

      Come visit the Netherlands, and when here, see the A13.

      When you enter that stretch of road your licenseplate is read and recorded. When you leave via any exit your licenseplate is again read, and the speed calculated. If your speed is over the limit your fine will follow automagically. If not all recorded info gets deleted. They say.

    17. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 1

      > First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment.

      Here in the UK they're in use. Various motorways are being monitored from fixed scanners. There are also active projects looking at automating the extraction of number plate data from speed cameras. Speed cameras are also moving from off-line photo-chemical film devices to fully electronic on-line devices.

      Roll all this up with the RFIDs in the tyres (and chassis drivers shoes, watch, fillings, lunch etc) and bingo.

    18. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by uspsguy · · Score: 1

      And, of course, you can cheaply mass produce policemen and place them around the country by the thousands or millions just to monitor cars. Yea, right. When people have to do the work, fishing expeditions get really expensive. When you can have a computer sift through gigabytes, it's cheap and fast providing all kinds of opportunities for abuse.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    19. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by soapy+(which+email) · · Score: 0

      Although a lot of slashdotter's have never read the archives (someone must have posted a link at some point) these cameras are common in the UK. Motorway gantries have these cameras mounted on them, and they have two IR spotlights next to them, and they read your (front) numberplate, and take your photo.

      Some distance further down the road, they read it again, and then they work out your average speed.

      Police PR sources claim that they can get 15,000 people a day without loading the system. At the moment, they are just used on areas with roadworks, outside the M25 (London's outer carpark/ringroad) but they are used to enforce the variable speed limits which are supposed to ease congestion.

      Also, as of the 7th(?) of Feb, all cars, vans, etc. that drive into the center of London will get their numberplates read, and the owner will be charged £5 for the privilidge of sitting in traffic for hours.
      See this article in the Guardian for ways around the cameras! They are optical, and they are OCR.

      Car cloning is one thing they mention, and to try and stop this, you now have to show documents to get a numberplate made up.. Of course, if you simply buy a numberplate making set, you don't need to show anything!

      --
      Insert punchline here
      They can have my computer when they pry my gun from my cold dead fingers.
    20. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Lord+Prox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Finally, vehicles move. Even a speedy RFID tag that transmits at 12kbps takes 1/46th of a second to send a typical 256 bit message (serial number + checksum + overhead). It takes 5-6 times this in practice to power the tag, interrogate it, and receive a response, in which time the car has moved >10ft at 60MPH. So even if you could have an ultra-high-gain antenna, it'd have to be significantly steerable, too.

      Well this might be true but try this... A trafic signal is equipped with the reader and scans while you are sitting at a red light.

      Or... the police car is equipped that is moving at 0 MPH relative to your car regardless to ground speed.

      Or... The local gas station/minimart/whatever is equipped to track you in the parking lot.

      In short the technology is not evil or anything but it is a powerful tool, and with great power comes great responsibility and I have zero faith that the powers that be will use this power in a responsible manner. It is setting the stage for a Bad Thing

    21. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Third, searches through public databases take time. It's not like they'll be able to identify you the moment their computer gets a lock on your identifying characteristic. Local caching would be prohibitively expensive for your average police department, no matter what the size of the city.

      You're new here, aren't you? Wireless connectivity. Learn it, love it. Cop cars commonly have terminals in them so they can key in license plate numbers w/o having to talk to dispatch. You are right though: searches do take time...usually measured in microseconds. A friend of mine, who just happens to be a sheriff mind you, says that's what he does when he's in his patrol car waiting at a red light. Keeps keying them in till he finds stolen, outstanding warrant, expired registration, etc.

      And by the way, I've been following you to work for 3 weeks now.

    22. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by blueleo · · Score: 1

      I remember talking to a devoted fisherman many years ago, when steel beltet radials were becoming common. He told me that he had them on his car, and the magnetic field they set up messed up the monofilament fishing line in his truck. Seems to me that someone clever could use that to generate some electicity.

    23. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by blueleo · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the misspellings. I meant that it affected the fishing line in his TRUNK.

    24. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by wings · · Score: 1

      Finally, vehicles move. Even a speedy RFID tag that transmits at 12kbps takes 1/46th of a second to send a typical 256 bit message (serial number + checksum + overhead). It takes 5-6 times this in practice to power the tag, interrogate it, and receive a response, in which time the car has moved >10ft at 60MPH. So even if you could have an ultra-high-gain antenna, it'd have to be significantly steerable, too.

      Most responses I've seen seem to expect that the sensor (transmitter/reciever) will be mounted at the roadside or overhead. It would not be difficult for a distributed sensor to be installed in the pavement, providing lane width coverage, about the length of a vehicle (15-20ft) up to a vertical height of 2-3ft. (tire height). This would eliminate the need for high gain, and reduce multiple responses to mostly the tires on the same vehicle, making vehicle identification significantly easier.

    25. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >Fifth, it might be possible to fry the RFID device by feeding it so much RF power that its circuitry melts.

      > (I know I'd certainly try if I had tires or clothing that had these devices. I'd go park next to a high-power radio tower for a few hours.)

      > There'd certainly be a market in devices capable of high-power directional transmissions. The devices are probably already illegal.

      A doctored microwave oven should suffice. A little dangerous, but certainly freely available, and 500W of 2.45Gig radition is likely to kill most chips.

      Oh, and I would probably take the tyres off of the car first...

    26. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by HoChiWaWa · · Score: 1

      a news article i read about rfid's in clothing claimed they killed them upon leaving the store not that i trust them so much but at least with clothing all they can really tell what brand a shirt is anyway. now the car tires could be more of a problem i guess being linked to your vin number and being more easily checked automaticly than a licence plate leveing more room for unwanted automated advertising and such. so all in all its not too bad considering you already have an easily dercernable link to your vin number in your licence plate this just can do it with an automated and probobly annoying system

    27. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I didn't know about that one. What is not clear to me is how they handle foreign cars. I've been to Great Britain (not London) with my car, and while I think it's probably insane to drive in London (as it is in Paris, btw), I wonder how would I get charged? Apart from that, the OCR might mistake my plate for someone elses plate who gets the bill. Not nice.

    28. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      Finally, vehicles move. Even a speedy RFID tag that transmits at 12kbps takes 1/46th of a second to send a typical 256 bit message (serial number + checksum + overhead). It takes 5-6 times this in practice to power the tag, interrogate it, and receive a response, in which time the car has moved >10ft at 60MPH. So even if you could have an ultra-high-gain antenna, it'd have to be significantly steerable, too.

      Most responses I've seen seem to expect that the sensor (transmitter/receiver) will be mounted at the roadside or overhead. It would not be difficult for a distributed sensor to be installed in the pavement, providing lane width coverage, about the length of a vehicle (15-20ft) up to a vertical height of 2-3ft. (tire height). This would eliminate the need for high gain, and reduce multiple responses to mostly the tires on the same vehicle, making vehicle identification significantly easier.


      The other most obvious use for this is the "Perfect Speed Trap".

      Cars going at the speed limit will give one signal off at the RFID inquiry spot (most likely a long wire running about 30 feet parallel to the road surface from the RFID inquiry beginning spot so as to allow for the speed of the vehicle entering the zone), the next part of the road following that has a the receiver area zone (another 30 feet of wires running perpendicular under the road spaced to give accurate readings of the car speed). If the car is speeding there is the instant RFID speed verification, the tires tattle on the driver, the police computer prints out a ticket and the traffic cops eat more doughnuts. Since this exists obviously mainly for the cops to give out easy automated tickets and for TOTAL INFORMATION "MINISTRY OF FREEDOM" GESTAPO to track the movements of all proles, er, "Free" American citizens.

      I would make a portable RFID zapper and just zap all my tires and any tires I encounter. I certainly wouldn't tolerate this ANTI-AMERICAN spyware in my tires and nobody else should.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    29. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Nick_Psyko · · Score: 1

      "First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment. First you'd have to be able to single out the license plate text from that of the neighboring car, or a road sign, or even a piece of litter tumbling across your Line-of-Sight." Trials (successful) were run a couple of years ago in Nottingham UK, automated licence place reading. They were designed to monitor distance/time, if the average speed is 90mph, you were speeding, a letter is sent out automaticaly. The issue here is that they could potentialy monitor an individual's movements throuought the country, automaticaly. The system never took off. Currently they are attempting to set up innner city congestion charges in London. If you pass a certain boundry and enter the inner city, a camera automaticaly registers your licence plate and sends you a bill. If you are a regular, you can buy a season ticket. This system may not be 'wsitched on' although it is already installed throuought most of the city and the databases have already been built. (Don't bother replying with grammer/spelling corrections, I don't care.)

      --
      mountvol \\?\brain{dbe069b1-65ae-11d5-bab4-806d6172696f}\hu mor\
    30. Re:Some Points on Effectiveness by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      First, I've never heard of police cars being equipped with live OCR equipment.
      In my experience, police officers have better than average eyesight. What's more, I've even met a fair few that could read.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  85. chicken and egg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    chicken and egg problem

    From the article: Michelin (the tire manufacturer) has announced that it is planning on embedding RFID transmitters into every tire. The article states that 'the microchip stores the tire's unique ID, which can be associated with the vehicle identification number.' Let the privacy invasion begin!

    Ken Thompson who we all know and love from UNIX lore has written Reflections on Trusting Trust which describes just this problem.

    Imagine that you insert a backdoor into a compiler, so that everything the compiler compiles is trojaned. If the compiler detects that it is recompiling itself, it quietly reinserts the trojan code. The actual source code to the trojan might be wiped out, but as long as you are running infected binaries, it will keep popping up again and again.

    From the paper: "First we compile the modified source with the normal C compiler to produce a bugged binary. We install this binary as the official C. We can now remove the bugs from the source of the compiler and the new binary will reinsert the bugs whenever it is compiled. Of course, the login command will remain bugged with no trace in source anywhere."

    A very interesting read.

  86. No conceivable privacy implications... by archnerd · · Score: 1

    RFID tags are passive devices; they're powered by an inductive coil in an electromagnetic field. That means that their maximum range is about two meters, so there's no easy way that they could be used to track someone.

    1. Re:No conceivable privacy implications... by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      The highway is usually 2 meters from the tire.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:No conceivable privacy implications... by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      That should be (less than) 2 meters. Slashcode ate the less than symbol.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    3. Re:No conceivable privacy implications... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Maybe someday someone will invent a machine that can dig holes.
      Then some other smart guy will come along and say "hey, why not put a rfid reader in at every stop"

      Fortunatly, they will need to develop that import "hole digging" ability first, so I don't see this happening anytime soon.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:No conceivable privacy implications... by archnerd · · Score: 1

      And Michelin is going to put RFID receivers on every road in America and go completely unnoticed? If your answer is "no, but the government will", then this should be the least of your concerns; they have better ways of going about it than that.

  87. Wouldn't it be possible to disable it? by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 1

    Call me crazy, but wouldn't it be relatively easy to create a signal (RF, microwave, etc) powerful enough to destroy such chips?

    --
    When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
  88. Michelin chip bah! THIS other chip would be useful by r00zky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At the end of the article there's a link with info about a chip that measures pressure and temperature of the tires:
    http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/93/1/1/
    That enables the driver to know when the pressure of one particular tire drops below a certain level
    Note: at the time of posting this the page seems ./ed :( anyone got more info about it?

    --
    I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
  89. do it yourself by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

    guess I'm gonna have to start making everything by hand using materials from my backyard.

    I know a great many people see this as nothing to worry about. If you're not doing anything wrong what will all this tagging and tracking really mean? But! I don't want anyone tracking shit about me. Its none of their damn business. Imagine this. when was the last time you were having a private conversation and someone was standing by staring at you? Imagine being stared at all the time by people you can't see and don't even know that they know what style of underwear you have on. All of this tagging of shit, its none of your fucking business. get out of my pants!

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  90. So how do you take them out? by Above · · Score: 1

    I've got to assume there's some way to fry the imbedded RFID tags. No doubt if you send the right signal at them (eg, too strong), or x-ray them or something you can burn out the circuits. Who's going to be first to post schematics?

  91. Does Michelin ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    plan to sell tinfoil coated tires as an upgrade?

  92. Michelin already uses barcodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Michelin already uses barcodes to track every tire they manufacture. Just look on the sidewall of any Michelin tire to see the barcode strip. The tires are usually install with the barcodes facing towards the inside of the wheel well.

  93. Not a big deal by djupedal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked in the tire retail channel (consumer & commercial) for 5 years. Every tire already has a unique id...this is just an improvement on the process.

    This will allow for improved tracking of products and product defects/hazards. Nothing new in terms of associating a tire with a car or owner. In fact, if someone steals your tires/wheels, you just might stand a better chance of recovery.

    The black helicopters already have enough means to track you...they don't need help from the tire industry.

    1. Re:Not a big deal by hhknighter · · Score: 1

      I agree actually.
      People in general like to dismiss anything suspicious, unfortunately. Just like the P3s with the Unique IDs.

      The idea is bad, knowing that whatever you do can be tracked. Hell, if everyone were goody two shoes, never broke a law (assuming stupid ones like no icecream in your pocket), there's no need for such devices. From another perspective though, there's also no HARM in such devices. Anything has two sides. Even the P3 unique IDs. True you information is being tracked possibly, but what if it's used for good: tracking the bastard who stole your computer? Banking checks your computer ID? Company networks will only allow those with certified IDs to access interal information?

      However, as these information can be used both ways. Some people use these systems for assumed guilt on us consumers, to retaliate, we assume guilt on them for implementing it.

    2. Re:Not a big deal by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Unlike the spyware that was just forced on me at my work, I don't mind the more laid back kinds of tracking.

  94. How about a usefull way to use these things by cdu13a · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have sesnors that read the rfid tags of the the
    car in each parking space. Then use the info collected to create a list of empty parking
    spaces. Then transmit the gps cordinates of each
    empty space on a predfined frequency. That way I
    could have my cars navigation system direct me to
    the nearest available parking spot.

    That way I don't have to drive around for an hour to find a spot.

    There is several flaws with this Idea, but atleast
    it is not a nother there goes my privacy post.

  95. Automation is the key by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cars already have unique identifiers (license plates), but those have to be visually read and interpreted by a human being... THAT'S the difference.

    It's the work of 2 minutes to swap plates with a similar-appearing car in some parking lot... but a bit harder to swap out tires; most people keep the same set for years... 50-60K miles is 3-4+ years of driving for the average american. If implanting microchips in the human body hits a roadblock (privacy concerns, "number-of-the-beast" arguments), then why not track the vehicle? It's practically the same thing.

    Vehicles are used mostly by single individuals, or single households with driving-age teenagers. Knowing where a vehicle goes is knowing what the household does. Marketing types have feverish dreams about the kind of demographic data you could gather with this.

    This could also be useful for law enforcement, but not in the immediate future. What the law-enforcement-as-big-brother scenario lacks is a network of tranmitter/receiver modules embedded in the roads and curbs. Once those are commonplace, automated tracking of a vehicle becomes a piece of cake.

    Most people don't realize just how labor-intensive a good surveillance operation can be. You need multiple teams, several different vehicles, and personnel skilled in the art of being unobtrusive. Visually surveiling someone requires manpower, training, and can be difficult under the best of circumstances (let alone at night, or in bad weather). GPS units are being used for this, but planting them can be a challenge, and a technically saavy target could detect or jam the transmission. Unique IDs in the tires and a network of readers might not give up-to-the-second velocity and position data, but they might be good enough...

    Car 1: "I got caught at the traffic light... lost 'im"

    Dispatcher: "He just took 131st street west... Car 2, turn right and pick him up at the next cross-street"

    Car 2: "got it"

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Automation is the key by tireg · · Score: 0

      While privacy is an issue here, but lets have a look at the good side of this.
      If someone steals your car, you'll be able to track where they've taken it. Yes yes they could swap out the tires and such but still.. I'd feel a little more secure if there was some way to track my car in the event it got stolen. Not that I'd use Michelin tires :D

    2. Re:Automation is the key by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's the work of 2 minutes to swap plates with a similar-appearing car in some parking lot... but a bit harder to swap out tires; most people keep the same set for years

      A problem, however with identifying "me" by my tires; if I want new tires, I'll go to Sears and buy a couple pairs, or go to my (small) mechanic and have him install a few tires. Now, he can either install new or used tires at my behest (depending on how long I intend to keep the vehicle, and drive it in the meantime). So where's the association? I can assure you that I'm not going to let some minimum wage Sears schmuck follow me to my car and record my VIN. Hell, for all he knows I'm using my friend's van to pick up the tires. The logistics just aren't reailstic.

      License plates are, by nature, assigned to a VIN. Tires are not associated, and are only slightly more difficult to interchange (give me a jack and ten minutes and I'll do it on the side of a road).

      Yes, I'm sure there's value to adding tracking devices to everything worth more than $50 that we may purchase in our lifetimes, but there are also drawbacks. If the "good guys" (subjective) can track my tires, so can the "bad guys" (also subjective). What I don't like, however, is the ability of anybody to easily track me. Atleast it takes some minimal effort to track my license plate - a person has to look at every car matching my description (if I threw a rock from my driveway, it'd probably bounce off atleast four other J-Body cavaliers, so YMMV. ;) )

      I, personally, can't see the advantages of this outweighing the disadvantages and costs associated. Somewhere, I'm sure somebody has a great plan. Nevertheless, I think I'll stick to Goodyear

      Unique IDs in the tires and a network of readers might not give up-to-the-second velocity and position data, but they might be good enough...

      Yeah, but then readers would be required nation-wide which is costly to say the least. The resaon 'automated roads' have been back-burnered is the astronomical expense of implementing it in any large scale. I don't see RFID readers being implemented in a nation-wide net any time soon. All you'd have to do to escape 'the man' is to hit a concession or a country road.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    3. Re:Automation is the key by manofherb · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many dumbasses we'll hear of getting caught because they forgot to swap out the spare!

    4. Re:Automation is the key by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      50-60K miles is 3-4+ years of driving for the average american.

      Now I understand all the Firestone problems. You do realise that tyres go "off" after about a year or so? Also, what kind of tyres are you using that last 50,000 miles? Perhaps in the UK and Europe we use softer compound tyres than the US, but 10-15K is more like average.

    5. Re:Automation is the key by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      It's the work of 2 minutes to swap plates ... harder to swap out tires

      Every watch Nascar?

      most people keep the same set for years

      And most people keep the same license plates even longer.

    6. Re:Automation is the key by Have+Blue · · Score: 1
      It's the work of 2 minutes to swap plates with a similar-appearing car in some parking lot...
      Isn't this illegal?
    7. Re:Automation is the key by operagost · · Score: 1

      Wow, you get less use out of a set of tires than a NASCAR driver.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Automation is the key by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      That's about average for EU tyres. That said, I've found driving American cars to be a terrifying experience due to the serious lack of grip. Maybe we have twistier roads here or something, and need the traction?

      And yes, I get through about four sets a year.

    9. Re:Automation is the key by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      It really depends on what tires you use. I live in the EU myself and my tires never last longer than 15000km. They are however ZR-rated.
      My dad who drives a completely different kind of car uses less highly rated tires and manages to make 30000km with one set. This is however still enormously lower than 50000 miles.

      Besides, I have the same problem with American cars. It's probably the extremely soft suspension... I prefer to feel every pothole ;-)

    10. Re:Automation is the key by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Get a Citroen XM or Xantia, where on all but the poverty-spec models they have hydraulic suspension that you can switch between really soft and "so hard, if you run over a penny you can tell if it's heads or tails". It must be a good setup, after all Rolls-Royce licence it from Citroen to use in their cars.

  96. Look what happened to me by grundie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to work for a software firm, who were based in a large building and with multiple tennants. To control access to our part of the building we were issued with contactless swipe cards. Which are a sort of crude, low power RFID system.

    We thought they were purely for access control, but we were in for a surprise. The management had fitted special sensors at the toilet and cafe doors as well as at the drinks machines and smoking rooms. We had no idea management had done this, we just though new heating control thermometers were being fitted.

    Once our bi-monthly productivity appraisals came round we were presented with a detailed breakdown of our movement round the building. I was asked why I made 12 visits to the coffee machine in one day (all drinks were free) and why I once spent more than 10 minutes in the toilet,

    What management had done was turn the securty cards in to tracking devices. Basically if we went within 4 feet of these sensors, it was logged. We had always assumed that the cards had to be within 2 inches of a sensor to be recognised, not so aparently. This whole setup was implemented to try and achieve productivity gains, in fact it did the opposite. A lot of people spent more and more time on the toilet for some reason and other people developed a habit of forgetting their cards and having to get security to release the doors remotely.

    The moral of the story is what started as a innocent security system, turned in to a tracking system which caused people serious stress. I know my employers are allowed to know what I do on their time, but having to justify my toilet habits is my idea of how such technology as RFID systems can be misused. Incidentally, the system was switched off after the unions got on the case.

    1. Re:Look what happened to me by koan · · Score: 1


      Of course this is exactly what the government will do with TIA and the other systems being implemented.
      This type of information and tracking is to big a lure for anyone to use it wisely.
      One day the mistakes you make as a youth (or at any age) will follow you forever, be part of your job interview and used to evaluate your place in society.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:Look what happened to me by shepd · · Score: 5, Funny

      >A lot of people spent more and more time on the toilet for some reason and other people developed a habit of forgetting their cards and having to get security to release the doors remotely.

      You're telling me nobody flushed 'em down the toilet? That would be fun for the tracking system!

      Or, a favourite. Buy a sandwich at the sandwich machine. Put the card in the sandwich's place. Heh.

      No, no, best idea: Plant the card on your boss. When he chews out your ass, tell him to check his.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Look what happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the thing to do in a situation like that ... find a way to vandalize/disable the receiver so that it fails to read anyone's ID and fails to let anyone in.

    4. Re:Look what happened to me by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Normally these cards have your picture on a plastic thing thats glued to the security card. I've noticed at my company that people usually take them off when they sit down at their desk.

      I wonder though - how long will it be before some magazine or website tells us how to program these ourselves.

    5. Re:Look what happened to me by tvsjr · · Score: 2, Informative

      (At least a couple of years ago), Nortel's Dallas facility was like this. Everyone essentially carried a "tolltag" like device. You could watch the employees move around the building like little lemmings. The resolution was pretty good. Doors that you were authorized to access opened as you approached - if you weren't authorized, they didn't. Also, if you, for instance, went up to the roof and tossed your card to someone on the ground, they couldn't get in because the computer hadn't seen you leave the building. Since you were supposed to wear the tag at all times, it would only open doors near your location.

    6. Re:Look what happened to me by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And of course complex software systems like this never have bugs, and couldn't possibly lock somebody in a room overnight because the system doesn't belive they can be near the only door.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    7. Re:Look what happened to me by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1



      Incidentally, the system was switched off after the unions got on the case.

      Really? Or do you mean that information just can't be used in your reviews? I mean, can you prove that they're off, when before you didn't even know that they existed?

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    8. Re:Look what happened to me by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      In the United Kingdom, this is illegal under the Data Protection act.

      Our government, at least sometimes, respects and protects our privacy.

    9. Re:Look what happened to me by Gumshoe · · Score: 1
      I was asked why I made 12 visits to the coffee machine in one day (all drinks were free) and why I once spent more than 10 minutes in the toilet,


      I can easily spend 10 minutes evacuating my bowels as I'm sure many, many other people do. Surely this is a legitimate explanation. I'm surprised the management didn't expect to see receipts.
    10. Re:Look what happened to me by grundie · · Score: 1

      I can easily spend 10 minutes evacuating my bowels as I'm sure many, many other people do. Surely this is a legitimate explanation. I'm surprised the management didn't expect to see receipts.

      That is exactly why the unions took issue with the system. They argued it would be a breach of privacy laws and threatened court cases to get the system deativiated, the owner must have realised he was on dodgy ground as he deativiated the system, which was not like him.

    11. Re:Look what happened to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      This type of information and tracking is too big a lure for anyone to use it wisely.

      Never, ever forget what happened at the Watergate.

      (for those with no clue, it was when Nixon used systems just like this to listen to his opponents conversations)

      Would you trust Bush & Pals with that kind of power? I think not...

    12. Re:Look what happened to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      In the United Kingdom, this is illegal under the Data Protection act.

      No it's not. All the act perscribes is that:

      • Companies storing personal information must register with the Data Protection Register
      • Companies must give the subject of that data full and unrestricted access to it.

      So, they can do it, if they wanted to. You do have the right to see all of your data, and you can check if there is anything like that in there. However, when was the last time you did this with your company? Never? Thought so...

      Besides, as much as I respect and admire the law on this (I always tick the "opt out" box for "sharing" information), it's pretty unenforceable. A company could store certain kinds of information that you don't get to see, but without conducting a complete search of their data personally, you never know if you did in fact receive it all originally.

    13. Re:Look what happened to me by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I can easily spend 10 minutes evacuating my bowels (snip) I'm surprised the management didn't expect to see receipts.

      If they do, just send them to goatse instead. They won't ask you again.

    14. Re:Look what happened to me by tbmaddux · · Score: 1
      I can easily spend 10 minutes evacuating my bowels as I'm sure many, many other people do.
      Especially after making 12 visits to the coffee machine in one day!!!
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    15. Re:Look what happened to me by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      I was asked why I made 12 visits to the coffee machine in one day (all drinks were free) and why I once spent more than 10 minutes in the toilet.

      Uh - if you're hitting the coffee machine 12 times a day, I think I can understand why you'd spend more than 10 minutes in the john.

    16. Re:Look what happened to me by praedor · · Score: 1

      Just to be sure, leave your badge/card on your desk whenever you leave it to do ANYTHING. Don't have it with you when you go get coffee, go to the drinking fountain, go to the bathroom, shag your office lover in the janitor closet, etc. ONLY have it with you to get into the building. If they are lying or still are tracking you but cannot use the information as before, all they'll get is a highly productive worker who never leaves his/her desk.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    17. Re:Look what happened to me by diamond0 · · Score: 1
      Dude, just leave the card at your desk.

      Honest, boss, I was at my desk ALL DAY!

      --

      --
      There is no hatred more pure and true than that expressed by children.
    18. Re:Look what happened to me by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      No, it *is* illegal. As an employee you must be notified if the company stores any personally identifiable data that you do not explicitly supply.

      This is why an IT policy is necessary to say things like "we monitor your email, IM etc.". Without the policy it is *illegal* to monitor their communications.

      www.dataprotection.gov.uk has much of what you need.

      FYI I challenged my company on this - they have a "late list" that is kept by the girls in reception. They note the time of anyone who arrives late for work, and if anyone is repeatedly doing it, they are dealt with. Because the employees were not notified that the list was kept, they had no way to verify its accuracy, and I called out board of directors on it - soon after all employees received a notice informing them of the practice, and how they could check the accuracy.

  97. Easy to disable by T4D · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If RFID tags where in everything, and the govt. had RFID readers everywhere, then I might be a little concerned. However, even if RFIDs where that pervasive, it would still be easy to become invisible to all those RFID scanners. Just microwave all your clothes. As small as ther are I cannot imagine an RFID tag being able to remain intact when hit with a large EM field. Tracking down and disabling RFIDs in your vehicle shouldn't be that difficult either.

  98. bar code? something smells. by twitter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The tire makers are just trying to comply with the law! The TREAD (Transportation, Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation) Act requires tire makers to track all of their tires in case they need to recall them.

    Recalls are not driving this. It would be cheaper to do this another way and unique IDs are not needed for recalls.

    Does anyone think it's cheaper to "invest" in all new equipment than it is to use established bar codes? Tell me why the company can't paint a nice little white bar coded serial number on the side of the tire? Everyone's got barcode readers and they would be more practical. How is a tire shop going to check the serial number of a single tire, when every tire in range answers?

    RFIDs are only useful for others who have nothing to do with tire recalls. Does anyone really expect to be told that their tires are recalled? Most recalls are silent, you either find out about them on your own from paid advertisements or you don't. While it would be very nice for Michalin to contact me if my particular lot of tires is bum, I don't see what that has to do with someone being able to ID my car from a distance. If tire lot is all you need, why the unique number? Won't unique serial numbers actually impeed lot recognition? When tires are sold at a shop all the information the company needs to meet the stated goal is collected. After that, no one else needs to know who you are.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  99. What it means to me... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...is that as I am going to need new tyres for my car, I will probably think twice before buying Michelins.

    Though I suspect that given the distances I drive here in Australia, it's unlikely to ever be a problem.

    After all, they can't even maintain mobile phone coverage without a fairly hefty power input.

    1. Re:What it means to me... by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      ..is that as I am going to need new tyres for my car, I will probably think twice before buying Michelins.

      That was the first thought in my head. what bothers me, however, is that other companies are likely to adapt this (Gilette is going to have RFIDs embedded in your razor blade soon...). Now once ALL companies have RFIDs in tires, it is unlikely that I will smuggle tires or make them at home...

    2. Re:What it means to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me. Here in the civilized world, the spelling is "Tire." This is reflected in the text of the article. Your culture lost; give it up already.

    3. Re:What it means to me... by hsidhu · · Score: 1

      ..is that as I am going to need new tyres for my car, I will probably think twice before buying Michelins. Look if you are if you are scared about your "privacy" then be smart and disable the intruding technology. The simplest way that I can think of is, shit remove the damn chip, you know because Michelins are good tires. There is always this talk on slashdot about the "man" infringing on our rights. You could be right, but as far as I can see any technology can be disabled as long as I can get my hands on it.

    4. Re:What it means to me... by hsidhu · · Score: 1
      ..is that as I am going to need new tyres for my car, I will probably think twice before buying Michelins.
      Look if you are if you are scared about your "privacy" then be smart and disable the intruding technology. The simplest way that I can think of is, shit remove the damn chip, you know because Michelins are good tires. There is always this talk on slashdot about the "man" infringing on our rights. You could be right, but as far as I can see any technology can be disabled as long as I can get my hands on it.
    5. Re:What it means to me... by coldascold · · Score: 1

      I already Have to remove the engine and replace with the standard when requested with an RTA inspection the swap back after being cleared...

      Michelins will become burned rubber with as far as Im concerned and with joy....

    6. Re:What it means to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is always this
      talk on slashdot about the "man" infringing on our rights. You could be right, but as far as I can see any technology can
      be disabled as long as I can get my hands on it.



      Lets interpret your statement:



      I am sufficiently threatened by the tags to disable them, therefore the tags aren't a threat.


      Or, perhaps you meant "The tags aren't a threat to /me/ because /I/ can disable them.

      In the former, you're just a babbling fool, the latter represents the sort of self centered moral development one would expect from a ten year old kid. I shudder to consider an adult thinking like this.



      Which one matches you the best? I'm gonna guess
      you're just a dumb ass kid with a big mouth.

    7. Re:What it means to me... by Quantuminium · · Score: 0

      Troll trolly troll-troll to you to. Why can't speak in own language? Would you complain about people posting messages in French or Spanish too just because they aren't American?

    8. Re:What it means to me... by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

      Gilette is going to have RFIDs embedded in your razor blade soon...

      Great! So now I'm going to need a tin-foil roof on my house to go with my tin-foil friggin hat?

    9. Re:What it means to me... by ces · · Score: 1

      Where the heck do you live? At least in my state of the US the vehicle inspectors will pass just about anything. You just have to be within the emissions limits, not have an exhaust leak, excessively loud exhaust, and not have anything obvious like a supercharger or nitrous system.

      Even if the inspector checks the engine VIN against the frame you can usually get away with saying you had to replace the old one.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    10. Re:What it means to me... by Mitreya · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You could be right, but as far as I can see any technology can be disabled as long as I can get my hands on it.

      One question: Can you skip over the FBI piracy warning/commercials when your playing a DVD in your DVD player? One that you can get your hands on? Oh, wait...

  100. Pressure gages by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    Speaking of built-in pressure gates in tires, when I was 7 I gave my father for father's day 4 screw caps with built-in pressure gates that I got from a catalog. He put them on and the next morning all 4 tires were flat. I found one of them in a box when I visited him over Christmas...I guess he kept it.

    1. Re:Pressure gages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know why you'd keep that...

      Next time some asshole screws you over... give them a little present. :-)

  101. General Comments by mandrews · · Score: 3, Insightful
    After reading the entire discussion, there are some excellent comments but quite a bit of outright speculation. A few facts (mostly from the story):
    The US Congress passed the TREAD (Transportation, Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation) Act in the wake of the Firestone/Ford Explorer debacle. The act mandates that car makers closely track tires from the 2004 model year on, so they can be recalled if there's a problem.
    It's auto manufactures who are responsible for tracking tires for recall. Michelin appears to be offering these tires to them (not the general consumer) for recall purposes. The suggestion about JiffyLube checking your tires for recall when you change your oil is, I think, what Michelin wants the car manufactures to do when you go to your dealer for service.
    Michelin hopes manufacturers will pay a little more for tires with RFID transponders, because it makes the tires easier to track.
    Michelin says the transponders cost "several dollars" today, but the price will drop if they are manufactured in mass volumes ... It's not clear yet whether automakers will be willing to pay the additional cost.
    Michelin tires already tend to be more expensive. They don't want to make it worse unless the manufactures will pay for it.
    The microchip stores the tire's unique ID, which can be associated with the vehicle identification number. The chip can also store information about when and where the tire was made, its maximum inflation pressure, size and so on.
    This same information can be gathered from other parts of the car. Michelin is trying to make things easier for the car dealers.
    But Michelin claims to be the first to meet the Automotive Industry Action Group's B-11 standard for North America, which calls for a read distance of 24 inches.
    As has already been pointed out, these things are passive devices. You pump a signal at them with a hand-held reader and it uses that energy to transmit. One of the points in the article is how much work is took to get a 24 inch read range. The only way you can use them to recover your stolen tires/wheels is to find them yourself and use the RFID as proof of ownership. As for tracking your children, you would need detectors spaced four feet apart in every road of your state.

    I've seen a picture of one of these tires in some other article. Michelin is so proud of solving the technical challenges, they are putting stickers on the side of the tires. Two years from now, if you want to know if its in your tire, look for the sticker. After all, the "technicians" changing your oil need to be able to tell if they can use the new-fangled tire reader on your tires or not.
    1. Re:General Comments by barzok · · Score: 1
      The US Congress passed the TREAD (Transportation, Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation) Act in the wake
      of the Firestone/Ford Explorer debacle. The act mandates that car makers closely track tires from the 2004 model year on, so they can be recalled if there's a problem.
      It's auto manufactures who are responsible for tracking tires for recall. Michelin appears to be offering these tires to them (not the general consumer) for recall purposes. The suggestion about JiffyLube checking your tires for recall when you change your oil is, I think, what Michelin wants the car manufactures to do when you go to your dealer for service.
      What happens when I replace the tires that came on the car the day after I buy it? I turn around and sell/trade those perfectly good tires to someone else. Now I get the recall notice (or maybe not), for tires I don't own, while some other guy is riding 4 ticking time bombs. Will I be held liable when he has a blowout at 70 MPH and crashes into oncoming traffic?
    2. Re:General Comments by mandrews · · Score: 1
      What happens when I replace the tires that came on the car the day after I buy it? I turn around and sell/trade those perfectly good tires to someone else. Now I get the recall notice (or maybe not), for tires I don't own, while some other guy is riding 4 ticking time bombs. Will I be held liable when he has a blowout at 70 MPH and crashes into oncoming traffic?
      I can't see how you would. You sold a legal product (which can be sold through other stores etc.) that you legally owned to someone else. When Walmart does this to you, neither you nor the government holds Walmart responsible for the recall. Instead you hold the manufacturer responsible.

      Anyway, that's my take on the situation.

      I'm not a lawyer and I don't play one on TV.
  102. In Libertarian Luna ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Business is watched by YOU!

  103. 23 by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Funny
    GM? AMC? Fiat? Lada?

    Oh, wait, I have the winner: Kia! ;-)

    Oh, wait, the winner is GM.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:23 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      keys pressed
      Shift
      G
      Shift
      M
      total key presses GM? 4

      keys pressed
      Shift K
      i
      a
      total key presses Kia? 4

      It's a tie folks

    2. Re:23 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny I olny get 3 when I type GM

      1. shift
      2. G
      3. M
      let go shift

    3. Re:23 by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      But GM is just an abbreviation for General Motors, so I guess we're back to F winning :)

  104. Do you all get your bonuses super fast this way by asscroft · · Score: 1

    Free turkeys for the entire month of November and free ham the entire month of december.

    And 20% off coupons every other day.

    sounds like a great idea to me.
    I'm in.
    (510) THE-SCAM is my phone number too.
    That's (510) 843-7226.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
    1. Re:Do you all get your bonuses super fast this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you live in berkley?

  105. OCR Traffic Cameras -- Already Available by tupps · · Score: 1

    The police here in Australia (well Victoria but I believe that all the other states use it as well) use speed camera and red light cameras. The pictures are processed automatically by computer to read your number plate and automatically send out the bill. The process is nearly entirely automated. In fact the camera operators are now private companies rather than tying up police watching a camera in a car.

    --
    Go out and get sailing!
  106. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by shepd · · Score: 1

    >The Government tells women what they can and can't do with their own bodies all the time (abortion).

    Hmmm, an abortion troll: I'll bite.

    Eric Cartman of South P, didn't your mother try to have you aborted at the 40th trimester? Stop telling your mother what to do with her body and get yourself aborted already! I mean, she asked for it and the government refused to do it! Go ahead and support your mother!

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  107. Told ya so.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    See. i wasn't nuts..

    damn i wish i was wrong about this stuff once in a while..

    Cant everyone see what is happening? We are loosing all our rights and freedoms and privacy at an alarmingly increasing rate..

    Its time to fight back.. once and for all. Its time for the revolution people.. Its time.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Told ya so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All in the name of (and for the sake of)the next to-be terrorist attack.

  108. Great Troll! by twitter · · Score: 1
    Just use an icepick to perforate the chip. :) ...To protect privacy, campaigning has to focus on the weak leak: The government.

    That's too rich, suggesting people put an ice pick into their tire then mispelling link as leak. What a clever devil you must think you are.

    Also, it is easy enough to buy tires anonymously by using the green stuff.

    They plan to collect VID numbers, which are attached to you by legally requried (in most states) insurance, and perhaps you automobile loan. Some people who have enough of the green stuff to buy whole automobiles can also just put it in a company name and spare themselves the imediate identification on toll roads and anywhere else the govenment cares to track your whereabouts.

    So now it will be that anonymous travel is dead. It was already dead in the air. Now your comming and going from towns can be tracked. This is evil indeed as it is expensive and not needed. Total Information Awareness for Homeland Security will make you free, no? Knowledge is Power? You bet it is, power over you.

    As you think privacy is so dead and the fourth amendment is so useless, do you mind if we cand I search your house a few times to harass you? After we confirm a patern of suspicious travel and cash usage, that is. Let's see, you must be a terrorist to:

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Great Troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, you da troll.

      Icepick = joke. Notice smiley. Get it? Put down your icepick.

      VID numbers? What the hell are those? Oh, VIN, of course. But you knew that. No, wait you didn't: VIN numbers are recorded in everyone's TITLE.

      Before you "correct" people, study up.

  109. Obligatory... by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these....

  110. New ad campaign for Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they put them in condoms, imagine the possibilities:

    "Don't fuck without homeland security!"
    "Keeping your borders safe from viral terrorists!"
    "Total Information Awareness: Buddy, you don't need the 'large' condoms"
    "TIA: For HER pleasure"

  111. battery powered? by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1

    Why not use a system that charges the unit by the rotation of the tire, storing the energy in a capacitor? It seem to me like that would be the ideal way to power such a system.

  112. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you document this?

    I just purchased a Range Rover (2003) and saw nothing of the sort mentioned anywhere in the sales literature, technical documentation, or owners manuals.

  113. That's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will match the ones in your twenty dollar bills now ! BUY Tin foil shares. I should start my own spam company and profit !

  114. I dont see much of a problem with tihs... by schatten · · Score: 1

    Why is this a problem? You probably think they want to see what kind of tires are on the road at any given time.

    How about theft of wheels & tires? There's a lot of that out there and finding the stolen goods can be valuable.

    What if it has gps capability and can track where they are? Well.. if that's the case, even better. The tire company can track how many miles particular tires are running and the conditions.

    If tire pressure guages were included, that would just rock - and even add quite a value to the manfuacturer when those SUV rollover claims are made.

  115. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by hyperturbopete · · Score: 1

    EZPASS is the mark of the beast

  116. How easy/hard is it to mess up a RFID? by bizitch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of lamenting about privacy here - and I totally agree.

    But - does anybody know how to simply/effectively fuck these things up?

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  117. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by hyperturbopete · · Score: 1

    All newborns will be protected with a tiny chip installed under their skin in the palm of their hand

    Doh! cant fix that one with the microwave

  118. "Michelin - We know what's riding on your tires." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    New slogan:

    "Michelin - We know what's riding on your tires."

  119. Ultimate Privacy Solutions by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Walk places.

    Take the fucking bus.

    Ride around on your banned Segway.

    "When pogo-sticks get outlawed, only outlaws will bounce around and not be tracked by the Feds."

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  120. I broke this story 5 months ago here. SPY CHIPS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    TOP SECRET FACT:Most modern cars have tracking transponders!

    Spy transmission chips embedded in tires that can be read REMOTELY while driving.

    A secret initiative exists to track all funnel-points on interstates and US borders for car tire ID transponders (RFid chips embedded in the tire).

    Yup. My brother works on them.

    Your tires have a passive coil with 64 to 128 bit serial number emitter in them! (AIAG B-11 ADC v3.0) . A particular frequency energizes it enough so that a receiver can read its little ROM. A ROM which in essence is your GUID for your TIRE. Multiple tires do not confuse the readers. Its almost identical to all "FastPass" "SpeedPass" technologies you see on gasoline keychain dongles and commuter windshield sticker-chips. The US gov has secretly started using these chips to track people.

    Its kind of like FBI "Taggants" in fertilizer and "Taggants" in Gasoline and Bullets, and Blackpowder. But these car tire transponder Ids are meant to actively track and trace movement of your car.

    I am not making this up. Melt down a high end Firestone, or Bridgestone tire and go through the bits near the rim (sometimes at base of tread) and you will locate the transmitter (similar to 'grain of rice' pet ids and Mobile SpeedPass, but not as high tech as the tollbooth based units). Sokymat LOGI 160, and Sokymat LOGI 120 transponder buttons are just SOME of the transponders found in modern high end car tires. The AIAG B-11 Tire tracking standard is now implemented for all 3rd party transponder manufactures [covered below].

    It is for QA and to prevent fraud and "car theft", but the US Customs service uses it in Canada to detect people who swap license plates on cars when doing a transport of contraband on a mule vehicle that normally has not logged enough hours across the border. The customs service and FBI do not yet talk about this, and are starting using it soon.

    Photos of chips before molded into tires:

    http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:TAQIKjBI01g C: www.sokymat.com/sp/applications/tireid.html

    (slashdot ruins links, so you will have to remove the ASCII space it insertess usually into the url above to get to the shocking info and photos on the enbedded LOGI 160 chips that the us gov scans when you cross mexican and canadian borders.)

    You never heard of it either because nobody moderates on slashdot anymore and this is probably +0 still. It has also never appeared in print before and is very secret.

    Californias Fastpass is being upgraded to scan ALL responding car tires in future years upcoming. I-75 may get them next in rural funnel points in Ohio.

    http://www.tadiran-telematics.com/products6.html

    but the fact is... YOU PROBABLY ALREADY HAVE A RADIO TRANSPONDER not counting your digital cell phone which is routinely silently pulsed in CA bay area each rush hour morning unless turned off (consult Wired Magazine Expose article). Those data point pulses are used by NSA on occasions.

    The us FBI with NRO/NSA blessings, has requested us gov make this tire scanning information as secret as the information regarding all us inkjet printers sold in usa in the last 3 years using "yellow" GUID barcode under dark ink regions to serialize printouts to thwart counterfeiting of 20 dollar bills. (30 to 40 percent of ALL California counterfeiting is done using cheap Epson inkjet printers, most purchased with credit cards foolishly). Luckily court dockets divulge the existence of the Epson serial numbers on your printouts... but nobody except a handful of people know about this Tire scanning upgrade to big brother's arsenal.

    YOU MUST BUY NEUTRALIZED OR FOREIGN TIRES!!!!! Soon such tires will become illegal to import or manufacture, just as Gasoline must have "Taggants" added or gasoline is illegal, as are non-self-aging 9 mm bullets.

    It is currently VERY illegal to buy or disable the "911 help" GPS emitter in digital cell phones in the US or ship a modified phone across state borders, but it is still legal to turn off your cell phone in your car while travelling. As you should. And you should be wary of your tires now too. : http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:TAQIKjBI01gC: www.sokymat.com/sp/applications/tireid.html

    Alternatively you could illegally build jamming devices at : 13.56 MHz, + 1,356 MHz +- many freqs (TI-RFid) and a few others. If microwave is ever employed you might not be able to effectively jam but your brain would possibly cook over time, as it now known as of this year that the three harmonic resonances of water are not the only chemical actions harming human tissue at gigaherz frequencies. Jammers would be illegal and violators easy to locate. Tire removal is the only option.

    RFIDs have been covertly used and sold by TI for over ten years are in many many products... and now your tires are being read by the us gov as you drive at speeds of up to 100 Mph on primary US interstate corridors. (Actually 160 km/h).

    Those same US interstate corridors have radiation detectors too, but a small layer of stacks of interlocked graphite blocks those from detecting stealthy deliveries. Graphite blocks are IDEAL for shipping "dirty bomb" components, I believe.

    Anyway, regarding tire radio transmitters: the sokymat LOGI 160, and sokymat LOGI 120) are just SOME of the transponders found in modern tires. The earliest tire radio spy chips had only 64 bit serial numbers but they have rapidly evolved post Sept 11 bombings: LOGI 160 LOGI 120 has 224 bit R/W memory (sokymat.ch) to be marked using external hand help injectors with "salt" info when the fbi tags your parked car.

    Basically the FBI "marks your car" without touching it physically, thus eliminating a "warrant" to put a locater on your vehicle. Just as the FBI can listen to you while you are at home by LEGALLY bouncing an infrared beam off your vibrating window pane and modulating the signal, the US Gov can LEGALLY inject (program) a saltable read-write sokymat LOGI eeprom tire chip (and other brands of tire transponders)

    Using these chips to track people while they drive is actually the idea of the us gov, and current chips CANNOT BE DISABLED or removed. They hope ALL tires will have these chips in 5 years and hope people have a very hard time finding non-chipped tires. Removing the chips is near impossible without destroying the tire as the chips were designed with that DARPA design goal.

    They are hardened against removal or heat damage or easy eye detection and can be almost ANYWHERE in the new "big brother" tires. In fact in current models they are integrated early and deep into the substrate of the tire as per US FBI request.

    Our freedom of travel are going away in 2003, because now there is an international STANDARD for all tire transponder RFID chips and in 2004 nearly ALL USA cars will have them. Refer to AIAG B-11 ADC, (B-11 is coincidentally Post Sept 11 fastrack initiative by US Gov to speed up tire chip standardization to one read-back standard for highway usage).

    The AIAG is "The Automotive Industry Action Group"

    The non proprietary (non-sokymat controlled) standard is the AIAG B-11 standard is the "Tire Label and Radio Frequency Identification" standard

    "ADC" stands for "Automatic Data Collection"

    The "AIDCW" is the US gov manipulated "Automatic Identification Data Collection Work Group"

    The standard was started and finished rapidly in less than a year as a direct consequence of the Sep 11 attacks by Saudi nationals.

    I believe detection of the AIAG B-11 radio chips (RFIS serial number transponders) in the upgraded car tracking http://www.tadiran-telematics.com/products6.html is currently secret knowledge. Another reason to leave "finger print on Driver license" California, but Ohio gets it next, as will every other state eventually.

    The AIAG is claiming the chips reduce car theft, assist in tracking defects, and assists error-proofing the tire assembly process. But the real secret is that these 5 cent devices are a us government backed initiative to track citizens travel without their consent or ability to disable the transponders in any way.

    All tire manufacturers are forced to comply AIAG B-11 3.0 Radio Tire tracking standard by the 2004 model year.

    http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:-qJPsZjkMAM C: www.aiag.org/publications/b11.html

    Viewing b11 synopsis is free, downloads from that are $10 and tracked by the FBI. Use the google cache to avoid leaving breadcrumbs.

    A huge (28 megabyte compressed zip) video of a tire being scanned remotely is at http://mows.aiag.org/ScriptContent/videos/ (the file is "video Aiagb-11.zip"). I would use a proxie when touching it. The FBI is monitoring the "curious" hackers.

    And just as showerheads are now illegal to import into the USA from Canada or mexico, as are drums of industrial Freon, and standard size toilets are illegal to import for home use, soon car tires without radio transponders will be illegal to bring across state borders.

    The US gov is getting away with this. You read it here first.

    Learn and read.

    I broke this story 5 months ago here and a few times after that. Each time, the FBI or Gov employees modded me down to -1. But if moderation WORKED, then you would have known all this 4 or 5 months ago instead of in 2003, when all tires have us gov mandated chips in them to track you on the highway (after they learn your GUID of course).

  121. Speed controll by afidel · · Score: 1

    This will just make it easier for the police to give speeding tickets. When EZ-Pass was first implemented there was musing about checking average speed between toll booths using the EZ-Pass and sending tickets automatically, it was killed because EZ-Pass is a voluntary system so this would have been seen as a major drawback, now if these RFID tags become universal and are associated with your VIN it will be easy to implement a similar system. Another even more creepy use is to monitor a large number of peoples movement throughout a city, simply have rfid readers at every traffic light and you have one of the simplest most intrusive monitoring networks ever conceived. Just because it sounds paranoid doesn't mean it's not potentially correct, if I can think of it so can some power freak in government and I don't think anyone is going to challenge it. Look at the US Patriot Act, it allows several breaches of the most fundamental right of due process and yet no one has even started a court challenge.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  122. Timothy can't read! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If they're going to embed electronics in tires, I wish they'd start with tiny pressure gauges.

    Hey, Timothy, you fucktard, read the article:

    Philips and Texas Instruments have also developed pressure and temperature sensors that use battery-powered RFID tags to communicate with a reader in the dashboard. That enables the driver to know when the pressure of one particular tire drops below a certain level (see RFID Chip To Monitor Tire Pressure).

  123. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    Jeez...

    Get a grip. They are just putting a damn chip in your tire. Who cares? So what if "they" know that I have Michelin tires on my Toyota. I couldn't care less. What are they going to do with that information? Track me down? Harass my family? I seriously doubt it. /.'ers need to quit bitching about this shit. If you don't want the stuff in your tires, don't buy them. Despite all of the rampant anti-americanism that plagues the forums of /., you still have a damned choice (tires, country to go live in). At least be thankful for that if you can't be thankful for anything else.

  124. They're everwhere, or will be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work on a RFID project and I am told that eventually the industry wants a unique RFID on every product in the world. Just think, every Coke bottle will have it's own name.

    Who needs DNA testing when you have RFID?

  125. I feel so much safer... by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

    So I guess if you see a car parked outside of your building on those pathetic little spare tires they put in cars you should run the other way =P

  126. I think a RF pulse (microwave) would do it too by xtal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I know of RFID chips, they use a tuned tank circuit to power the return pulse. A relatively strong signal close to the device should easily be able to reduce this circuit to a ruin without hurting anything. I think this is similar to how the tags get disabled that they put on clothes to prevent shoplifting.

    If these are in my next $1600cdn set of Michelin Pilot Sports, I'll have a circuit to disable them on the net in the summer. I didn't buy those tires 'cause I like driving 55mph.

    --
    ..don't panic
  127. RFID is better than a snake.. by TracerJPN_USMC · · Score: 1

    http://www.uq.edu.au/education/extra/all.html

    --
    magnanomous.
  128. One Step Closer To The Mark of The BEAST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chip this, chip that, glamorize GPS...

    Barcode and chip, the mark of the beast technology is one step closer to reality.

    "Why not take the mark of the beast?" some may argue, "everything you own is already chipped anyway!"

    Just say NO to this type of technology.

  129. No kidding? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

    Those cameras are proliferating in the States -- they turn out to be wonderful moneymakers -- and are fairly controversial. There has even been some question whether they improve safety, because motorists who know the cameras are there sometimes behave recklessly to beat the red light or slam on the brakes. I'm waiting to see statistics.

    Anyway, I'm almost certain the images are still processed by humans. I'm sure there will be some reluctance to handing is over to a computer, but I was just speculating it would happen. And apparently is has. Now, with a system like that -- plenty of cameras already installed -- why bother with tire chips?

    Here is an example of what you describe, I think. I also see via Google various reference to these systems being used in the U.S. -- going back a couple of years! But I'm sure I haven't read about them, only the human mediated system used by Lockheed, which runs the cameras in our area by contract.

    1. Re:No kidding? by tupps · · Score: 1

      These are exceptionally good money makers here in Australia. Recently the government tightened the laws as to the tolerances given for speeding (was speed + 10% + 3km, now just +3km over the speed) to compensate for people whose spedoes might be out. Next on the money making wheel is combined red light & speed camera in one unit. That way if you speed through the red light you will get done for speeding as well as the red light.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
  130. A little big by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

    Who the hell shoplifts tires?

  131. Swapping tires... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, are we going to start seeing people swap tires with each other?

    They already do.

    Park your car in a garage in New York City. See if you have the same tires when you get it back.

    B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  132. Smells like BS... by mangu · · Score: 1

    If your company had such talented people they could track everyone's visits to the toilet and coffee machine, they could do such wonderful things that productivity loss due to a toilet visit would be so insignificant...

    1. Re:Smells like BS... by grundie · · Score: 1

      If you had met the company owner you would understand. He was a local businessman whose software firm was just one of many different businesses he operated. He had his hands in pubs, gyms, training services and renting property. He was after one thing only, money.

      He knew nothing about programming, he had set the business up to exploit others and pay them not very competative wages. He was notoriously paranoid about productivity as he wanted to be sure we were working our backs off to make him more moolah. When ADT offered him the add on to the security system, he jumped at the chance to install it. His reasoning was to do that he was rarely in the building, but the reports generated by this system didn't lie and he liked that as he did not trust the managers to keep us working our backs off.

  133. Re:Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4. From how far away can the tag be read?
    The typical range is a few feet, a la Mobil SpeedPass or tollbooth EZPass. Think about how often you come within a few feet of something that could secretly house an RFID tag reader... The THEORETICAL range limit is a few feet PLUS line-of-sight. A high gain antenna on the reader could read tags from a great distance away, just like your Pringles can 802.11 antenna.

    Incorrect. RFID tags are powered by the reader, it is possible to intercept the tags response to a reader using a high gain antenna, but at the power levels a RFID tag transmits at, it is unlikely you could pick up a RFID response from more than 50m away, even with a large dish.

    To illicit a response without overhearing an exchange, you would need an extremely directional antenna, and even then you are likely to get multiple responses, which makes it useless.

  134. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, why shouldn't women have the right to neutralize the living human inside their fetus?

  135. Please post (anonymously) the name of co and boss. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a software firm [...] To control access to our part of the building we were issued with contactless swipe cards.

    [...] The management had fitted special sensors at the toilet and cafe doors as well as at the drinks machines and smoking rooms. [...]

    Once our bi-monthly productivity appraisals came round we were presented with a detailed breakdown of our movement round the building. I was asked why I made 12 visits to the coffee machine in one day (all drinks were free) and why I once spent more than 10 minutes in the toilet [...]

    [...] This whole setup was implemented to try and achieve productivity gains, in fact it did the opposite. [...]


    AND, no doubt, led to the resignation of some of the company's best talent (perhaps including yourself).

    Please post the name of the company (if it still exists) and any management who were involved with either the decision to deploy this added "feature" or who used its output in performance reviews.

    Any executive who is misusing his time and the company's resources in such a fashion should be fired. If he is not immediately fired, his manager's competency is also suspect, as is the competency of HIS manger if HE is retained, and so on.

    Further, the board and stockholders have a right to know how their company and investment are being mismanaged.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  136. Congress did, I guess by hobo2k · · Score: 5, Informative
    2nd paragraph of the article:
    The US Congress passed the TREAD (Transportation, Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation) Act in the wake of the Firestone/Ford Explorer debacle. The act mandates that car makers closely track tires from the 2004 model year on, so they can be recalled if there's a problem. This technology could be available for the 2005 model year.
    1. Re:Congress did, I guess by DZign · · Score: 1
      at least someone who reads and has some logic.


      just because /. says this is about privicy, doesn't mean it really is


      this is indeed

      1. legal: so they can track tires in case of a recall

      and why do they need rf ? because you just can't print a serial number on a tire as it'll wear off and rf is easy to check, can be (semi) automated

      2. for manufacturers:
      like another post said, car manufacturers who buy millions of tires, want to be able to track every
      single part
      this in case of a recall, or even just for inventory management


      about all the privacy concerns and 'they' having databases tracking you.. get real.. the investment would be too high..
      and it would mean everything in the database is perfect.. as people pointed out, you can buy tires
      for someone else, swap them, .. there are more reliable ways of tracking someone (i.e. your mobile phone, or adding some GPS device to a car)


      btw I work for a car shipping company.. we sometimes even have cars with serial numbers which according to the manufacturer don't exist and have never been produced ?!
      So forget about finding a 'perfect' database with everything in it..

    2. Re:Congress did, I guess by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So forget about finding a 'perfect' database with everything in it..
      I'm not worried about a perfect database. I'm worried about an imperfect database that some idiot *will* insist on treating as if it were perfect.
      What happens with the cars with serial numbers which "don't exist"? I would assume that you handle it somehow, reasonably. The problem with automated systems is that while they can reason sylogistically, they are quite incapable of being reasonable. Correct logic from faulty premises leads to incorrect conclusions.

    3. Re:Congress did, I guess by infolib · · Score: 1

      The act mandates that car makers closely track tires

      What's wrong with bar codes?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    4. Re:Congress did, I guess by ces · · Score: 1

      You need a method that won't wear away as the tire wears.

      True they could emboss lot numbers on the sidewall but those are subject to wear.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  137. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know I usually write off some of the more extream paranoia, but what does this do OTHER than violate your privacy etc. There are a dozens of other ways to uniquly identify tires and other stolen property. Besides wouldnt a thief just use some kind of emp and fry the thing, just jerk the microwave generator out of your microwave, point and click (yes i know it would take a little more work but not much).

  138. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The issue is not of them harassing you right now, but of them BEING ABLE TO harass you and your family for any reason 'they' would like to.

  139. MOD PARENT UP !!!!! MOD PARENT UP !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exactly... we are aproaching the end of days...

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP !!!!! MOD PARENT UP !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. Closer to the end of days eh? Wonder who is 666 though.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP !!!!! MOD PARENT UP !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you say that unit 666?

  140. French Nazi's by Tomy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I worked for Michelin for seventeen years, so I might be a resource on this. Michelin management is basically a bunch of Nazi's disguised as french. And that is just the little Napoleon's running around (You know who you are Camille), American management is worse than the french, basically bloodsucking leaches that will steal any idea for their own personal gain (Hi Jim!). These aren't pointy heads, but pointy horned bosses. I use to say buy Michelin for the quality, but if you buy Michelin, you are supporting human rights abuses.

  141. 10 years from now, Cruising for Demographics. by JHandey · · Score: 1

    If the RFID tags hit all high price merchandise I have a feeling targeted advertising will LOVE it.

    Imagine vans cruising neighborhood after neighborhood pinging the RFID tags at every house and creating a crossreferenced database of where you live and what you buy.
    Hell, with regular updates they can even guesstimate your rate of spending on certain products.

    So what's the legal situation with doing this?
    There is none.. it's too new, and that means the wolves will get to it a year before the laws.

  142. You want tiny pressure guages? by GCH · · Score: 1
  143. Deliberately missing the point? by IBitOBear · · Score: 1

    Several things are different between the license plate, the actual VIN, and having a series of RFID tags put in your tires.

    1) The official nmbers are issued and controlled by an official process, not my local mechanic.

    2) The tag number and VIN are singular to their purposes. That is, there aren't five and more of these numbers to each veichle at the same time.

    3) They (the real numbers) don't transfer between vheciles wihtout official process.

    4) They (the real numbers) don't broadcast information beyond line of sight. (This is significant for the same reasons that [legally] "you can not trespass with the eyes" because seeing and being seen are orthogonal operations. If you don't understand this, consider that you can photograph or video people wihtout sound, in public, for any legal purpose, but recording sound or radio is verboten.)

    5) RFID tags are actively/electrically "interrogated" and that interrogative action begs to be tied into a larger system.

    6) Who will control the concordance of these comercial numbers with the governmental information?

    7) Who will see that old or inaccurate information is properly expurgated? (When I take my license plates from the DMV it starts a chain of possession with clear boundries and requirements. If my plates are stolen, there is a clear means to propigate that chain of information. If I recycle my tires when I buy a new set, and Clem "recycles" them by putting them on his trans-am, how do I know and what are my options to separate him from me?

    8) "everyone knows" they have license plates and a VIN. How many people will know "automatically" that they are being tracked by their tires?

    9) What if the installer transposes the numbers while recording the numbers when installing your tires and now you are the infamous burglar or child molester down the block?

    In short, being arbitrarily branded with numbers that will be broadcast in response to all sorts of random queries by unlimited numbers of people is A BAD IDEA.

    Rob.

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
  144. Refuting some common arguments by n-baxley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People are saying who cares:
    1) You have to be 2 feet from the tire.
    2) You already have license plates
    3) This just IDs the tire, not you
    4) No one cares about you

    Now I'm not a paranoid freak, but these are just stupid arguments as I'll demonstrate.
    1) When you pull through the drive through at McD's and the Bank, you are less than 2 feet and sit there for quite some time. McD's might like to now that VIN #12345 always orders a BigMac, and by linking your VIN to you, they know what you like.
    2) Yes, but license plates can not be read without direct line of site, by a computer, for little or no cost.
    3) This ties the tires to the VIN of your car, which IDs you.
    4) The government may not be trying to track me down, but companies would love to have a way to track their customers.

    Let's all not get too paranoid, but at least think things through.

    1. Re:Refuting some common arguments by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      You forgot two important arguments; One for #1, and one for #4.

      You don't have to be two feet from the tire. Line of sight works just as well. High-gain antennas work on BOTH ends.

      No one cares about you TODAY, but through the wonders of profiling - Maybe you're shitty at parallel parking so you drive around blocks often, which makes it look like you're casing something - Someone might care about you TOMORROW!

      Finally, a loose quote from the best cyberpunk movie ever, Strange Days: "It's not whether you're paranoid, Lenny, it's whether you're paranoid enough." Who ever fucken thought that tempest would exist, and people would be reading the information on your computer screen from across the street without LOS? When I found out about that it bent my mind permanently so that I'm paranoid all the time. I don't have anything to be paranoid about really, so I don't ACT paranoid, but I do THINK paranoid. All the time.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  145. Anti-RFID: EMP (electromagnetic pulse) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be really easy to make a device that emits a mild EMP to fry all RFID devices in range... these things get their power from the transmitter, so they will pick up an EMP more easily than ordinary chips.

    I know there are designs for limited-range directed EMP devices out there... you don't need a nuke!

    Somebody is going to make good $$$ selling EMP devices... I for one will buy one and run all newly bought tires, clothing, etc., past it.

  146. Are You Only What You Buy? by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Why do so many of you define yourselves only as "consumers"? Are you only what you buy? Sad.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  147. What is it with privacy in the US? This is great! by leeet · · Score: 1

    Why is everytime a nice idea comes out, everyone has to bash about privacy? This could eventually lead to finding stolen cars, escapees, kidnapings, etc. If bridges and major intersections were equipped with sensors, it would help police locate cars. It could also eliminate high speed chases as polices would simply have to pinpoint the car (as long as it drives where sensors are located)

    Now for 99.9% of us, who cares? What's wrong with someone else knowing where you are driving? Are you guys *THAT* paranoid? I don't see anything wrong with this and I think it's a great idea.

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  148. Huge invasion of privacy by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 1

    Man, it's like I'm being tracked day and night. When I think about it, someone knows where I am all the time, and probably why I'm there.

    But enough about married life. What's this about tires? The site's slashdotted.

  149. Comparison to XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, if you have the tires installed on your car, they can identify those tires with your vin number, if scanned somehow. Unlike XP, where the OS identifies itself with a particular motherboard, etc., you can move the tires to another vehicle, and they will still hold air. Perhaps you then have to "log on" to the tire makers website, and "change" your tire/vin combination. Apparently, you'll get a username and password when you buy the tires. problem for repair shops, dealers, etc. is the cost of the scanner to find mismatched installations. XP, however, just won't boot in a swapped motherboard situation, unless you call Microsoft and 'splain what happened.

  150. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was shocked to discover that babies are not allowed to leave the hospital until they have been assigned Social Security Numbers!

    Talk about Big Brother!

  151. Microwaves and magnets won't do squat by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
    The RFID manufacturers are a few steps ahead of you. Used to be that you could go into a dressing room, pull out a big ass magnet and zap the RFID by waving the magnet over it a few times. The induced current in the antenna would fry the circuit and the goods walked out the door.

    Lesson learned on the manufacturer's part. Now, the devices have current limiting circuitry that disconnects the chip from the antenna when there's a power surge. When the surge dies down, the chip reattaches and the RFID is back in business. These ain't your Momma's RFIDs any more. The new RFIDs can be sewn into clothing and dried in microwave ovens with no ill effect to the chip.

  152. Used tires may be dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever bought cheap used tires? Then ask yourself who sold them and why he did so.

    I once had to hit the pavement/sidewalk at about 50 km/h to avoid a collision. I guess one tire got hidden structual damage, so i exchanged it. I did the same with a spare tire that lived 10 years in my trunk because i haven't got a flat. Both times i felt very unconfortable paying my recycling fee, because the tires looked still quite good. What if someone, instead of burning the tires, sold those HR tires to some poor soul als used ones? I would have felt much better if there would have been some sort of database where i could put some kind of warning. (I thought about putting a knife in the tire, but it is not as easy as seen on TV)
    Tracking security-relevant parts is in my opinion a good idea, just think of cheap pirated spare parts. It is common in aviation industrie, and some cars definitly go faster than small planes.
    This is no loss of privacy (think of the license plate), but a great gain of security.

  153. Good point but... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    Now, the devices have current limiting circuitry that disconnects the chip from the antenna when there's a power surge. The new RFIDs can be sewn into clothing and dried in microwave ovens with no ill effect to the chip.

    WEll, yes they might do that for shoplifters, but no one is going to shoplift tires, and anything that isn't necessary is going to add cost to the tire. So when it comes to added money in the tire, I'm going to take the safe bet and assume that corporate America is going to take the cheapest route with the RFIDs. So, you could probably fry them, unless it is cost negligable to make them tamper proof.

    I guess the only good news of this is that soon no one can just go dumping and throw old tires out on the side of the highway anymore. They're gonna know it is you that did it, or at least the tire company when they come to talk to you.

    1. Re:Good point but... by sirsex · · Score: 1

      but no one is going to shoplift tires

      You'd be suprised. The last thing the security guard would watch is two chicks carrying out a set of tires.

      College newspaper demonstration of Walmart security :)

    2. Re:Good point but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the cheapest route possible is using the part that's going to be manufactured by the bazillions, with the surge resistance.

    3. Re:Good point but... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      I doubt the chicks or anyone carries tires. More likely the chicks would use a pallet jack. Even better, they'd roll them on the ground one at a time. Now to roll the tires and keep them from falling, they have to bend way over as they walk. If I was the security guard, and these chicks were beatiful enough to be called chicks, I'd be watching.

  154. Here's how to stop RFID tracking- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All we have to do is start some kind of vicious rumor that RFID tags cause cancer, leukemia, etc. etc.



    Look at all the uproar over living next to power lines, genetically modified foods, cancer-causing cell phones, and so on.



    Some sort of ailment (real or imagined) should be linked to something or other with these tags and technology. People will go insane, have Congressional hearings, ban companies who use them, ad nauseum.



    Don't look towards jamming devices, microwaves, et al. We have to get subversive about this kind of privacy-infringing crap.

  155. How to disable, or how to render USELESS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen many, many posts about people wondering how to disable RFID devices. What I would really like to know is how easy is it to manufacture them? Wouldn't it be equally effective to flood the marketplace, workplace and public places with bogus and distracting RFIDs? Too much information equals no information, that sort of thing?

  156. Re:bar code? something smells. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are unique ID's not needed for recalls? Model number alone will not specify "all tires manufactured at the Aurora plant on Jan 14, 2003 from 3:00am to 4:50am"

    Most tires come with barcodes printed on the side. They last about a month.

    The range for the proposed devices seems to be something like two or three feet. I'm sure you could easily test whether a tire is recalled when the car comes in for rotation. It's not like a car has all four tires within a radius of four feet.

    Furthermore, unique serial numbers do not need to be random. Stamping a tire with the model number, production run number, plant, assembly unit, date and time of manufacture is simultaneously unique and useful.

  157. Look what happened to US - OT as usual by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    One day the mistakes you make as a youth (or at any age) will follow you forever, be part of your job interview and used to evaluate your place in society.

    Yet we have a cocaine-sniffing, semi-retarded, alcoholic, AWOL president who 'chokes on pretzels' and doesn't have enough brain power left to use words that actually exist.

    So there's hope for even the biggest fuck-up! You too can be president!

    Please listen to the State of the Union address coming soon. You'll get to hear Our Nation's Crackhead try and bite some of Kennedy's vibe with the, "Put a man on Mars" crap. Why has that become so important all of a sudden? Could it have something to do with his ever-dropping approval rating (52%, down from 85%)

    Hmm. Take the minds of the US citizenry off how shitty its gotten.

    I've got a better idea. Legalize drugs. Then no one will care what the fuck you do, Super-Prez!

    (BTW - I agree with you when I'm not ranting ;)

    1. Re:Look what happened to US - OT as usual by koan · · Score: 1

      He has money, lots of money, do you have money>? no... then you can't bury it.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  158. I have 3 sets at any given time... by tgd · · Score: 1

    Summer street, winter street, track. They get switched around, traded with friends, etc...

    I couldn't care less if they mark them... not a car in the world under $150,000 comes with decent tires, and I'd run tires that came with the car just long enough to get real tires on there.

  159. What's a roomate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > black roomate killed for borrowing your car

    I've never had a roomate, of any color. But I have had several roommates.

    Please don't destroy the English language.

    1. Re:What's a roomate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't they give milk or sumpthin?

  160. A boon for criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Not to ignore the significant privacy issues to the commoner, but once these things are in tires, they can be used by criminals to watch for police... or discover if an undercover cop is driving up...

    Here's how:

    1) Acquire a reader.
    2) Go to a location where there's lots of cop or cop-related vehicles (police station parking lot, police academy parking lot, streets right in front of cop shops, favorite cop hangouts, donut shops, etc.) and scan the tires... Capture the IDs.

    To allay suspicion - have some 10-12 year old kids play hide-n-seek around the vehicles while they wear goofy looking backpacks... Inside the backpacks are the readers... If the kids are caught it's "ummm...sorry officer... we're just playing hide n seek!"...

    3) Install readers in the street around your "compound"...
    4) When cars pass over that match the ID's you've captured, trigger a camera, an alert, heavy duty bolts to lock the doors and windows, whatever...
    5) If you're doin' a buy on the sly, you can set up a portable reader with a wi-fi link on it to see if the car pulling up is a cop car or not... If it is, take appropriate action...

    And for those of you who think that the cops just won't use it - that's OK too... If the consumers are mandated to use it and the cops aren't, then there's information in the lack of information ya know... (gotta love inference controls eh?)

    Yep... this is great... hope the feds like it...

  161. Hey, I wish they had these a while ago... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    then maybe I could find my stolen wheels and tires !

  162. Re:Incorrect by n1ywb · · Score: 1
    Incorrect. RFID tags are powered by the reader, it is possible to intercept the tags response to a reader using a high gain antenna, but at the power levels a RFID tag transmits at, it is unlikely you could pick up a RFID response from more than 50m away, even with a large dish.

    In a practical sense, yes. You'll notice I used the word "theoretical".

    To illicit a response without overhearing an exchange, you would need an extremely directional antenna, and even then you are likely to get multiple responses, which makes it useless.

    Incorrect. Page 7 of http://www.microchip.com/download/lit/pline/rfid/g uides/21299d.pdf says
    in a growing
    number of new applications, the simultaneous reading
    of several tags in the same RF field is absolutely critical:
    library books, airline baggage, garment and retail
    applications are a few.
    In order to read multiple tags simultaneously, the tag
    and reader must be designed to detect the condition
    that more than one tag is active. Otherwise, the tags
    will all backscatter the carrier at the same time and the
    amplitude-modulated waveforms shown in Figure 3
    and Figure 4 would be garbled. This is referred to as a
    collision. No data would be transferred to the reader.
    The tag/reader interface is similar to a serial bus, even
    though the "bus" travels through the air. In a wired
    serial bus application, arbitration is necessary to prevent
    bus contention. The RFID interface also requires
    arbitration so that only one tag transmits data over the
    "bus" at one time.
    A number of different methods are in use and in
    development today for preventing collisions; most are
    patented or patent pending. Yet, all are related to
    making sure that only one tag "talks" (backscatters) at
    any one time. See the MCRF250 (DS21267),
    MCRF355/360 (DS21287) and MCRF45X (DS40232)
    data sheets for various anti-collision algorithms.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  163. mod parent troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Save one life? Gimme a break. Is cliche' the new troll tactic to look stupid enough not to appear to be trolling?

  164. Re:2 (is less than) 3 by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    But GM is just an abbreviation for General Motors, so I guess we're back to F winning :)

    And Ford is short for Ford Motor Company. So what? Typing GM would have got the point across, particularly when the poster listed GM, Fiat ... and then said Kia was the winner.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  165. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by shepd · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... since you really don't care for privacy...

    I'm a nice guy. I have a supply of a few hundred clear plastic baggies. If I sent them to you, free of charge, would you use them instead of paper evelopes to send your mail?

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  166. Hackable Tires by lanner · · Score: 1


    "Information can be updated with a handheld reader."

    Who is going to be the first to lay down a strip on a major metro street with some little wires in it that updates everyone's tires as they drive by with stuff like "0wnzored" and "Michelin Sux!"

  167. I have to raise the B.S. Flag by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't possibly see them putting this into every tire... It would raise the cost too much making them uncompetitive.

    I could *maybe* see them putting this into the highest of high performance tires as security devices.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:I have to raise the B.S. Flag by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      Mustang Matt: I can't possibly see them putting this into every tire... It would raise the cost too much making them uncompetitive.

      Which morons modded this post up to "5, Insightful?" They oughta be smacked with a stick.

      The whole point is that the RFID tags are dirt cheap -- no more than a few cents -- so they won't affect the tire price at all.

  168. Ah yes, I forgot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    VID numbers? What the hell are those? Oh, VIN, of course. But you knew that. No, wait you didn't: VIN numbers are recorded in everyone's TITLE.

    Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), with your company or your own name on it. Cross-referenced with your new RFID in your tire, the VID number leads to your location being tracked at anyplace anyone wants to set up a monitor.

    Duuuuhhhhhh, you were saying something?

  169. OCR? can you say gullible? by vermicious · · Score: 1

    So one guy mentions OCR and everyones jargon meter gets pegged. HELLO! it was in jest. OCR = Optical Character Recognition. Meaning, SOMEONE WHAT CAN READ. duh.

  170. Give it a break already... by al701 · · Score: 1

    I love how instantly the first reaction is, well there goes my rights, my privacy, my freedom, and oh yeah the sky is falling.

    Have you guys even thought once about the benifits? Think about how many people drive around on bald tires, or what about theft? Something with this could maybe help both of those aspects.

    Imagine this scenario, contract with Mobile, now every time I get fuel, a sensor can check my tires and my cars mileage and remind me if I should have them checked out, or rotated.

    As for theft, well that is easy. Tires can't be on a car that they shouldn't be.

    Seriously, with the audience, this site supposidly draws, I would hope that the creativity would be a little higher, then, "whoa, big brother is after my tire usage"

    Let the flames begin. =}

  171. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if it becomes illegal to disable the tags? Is it legal to disable your social security number? Drivers license number?

    These things are not for your benefit and are not meant to be under your control. Saying they're OK because they can be disabled is an appeal to powers you do not posses.

    1. Re:Heh by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1

      You're not required to have a social security number. (True!)

  172. Another tech.. http://www.stopya.com by 0z0*!a · · Score: 0

    Every time something bad happen, there is eather a new law or new invention.

  173. Your Rights Online????? by lhaeh · · Score: 1
    I thought this was supposed to be 'Your Rights Online' not 'Your Rights OnTheRoad'

    Well... Maybe if I had a computer in the car....

    Didn't they say the same thing about licence plates when they came out?

  174. You guys keep missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's a slippery slope. Michelin might not want to track tires to cars...but if the capability is there, what's to prevent someone else from doing the same thing? This RFID gizmo is a friggin computer fer heaven sakes. And do you think that kook with the total awareness program isn't thinking of this? Ways to track citiz^H^H^Hpersons of interest...

  175. Chip-zapping ideas? by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that there are at least two devices that could wreak havoc with any RFID chip. First, a simple bulk magnetic tape eraser. They generate one heck of a 60Hz AC magnetic field that should be strong enough to permanently fry the chip.

    Second option: One of those high-voltage contact stun-guns that you can get from security or cop-supply outfits. Fire that up, pass it all over the tire. The rubber won't be bothered by the arc, since rubber's a darn good insulator, but I'd wager it'd turn the RFID chip into silicon toast.

    If product manufacturers get it through their heads that consumers won't put up with this kind of crap, they might just give up.

    Any other ideas for chip-zapping, besides a microwave oven? (And I can just see someone trying to stuff a steel-belted radial into a microwave). ;-)

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:Chip-zapping ideas? by Ogion · · Score: 1

      Of course you can zap the chip, but then you've lost your warranty. :) The next time you want an oil-exchange, they are going to change your tires, too, and charge you for that.

      --
      -- we're dressed in green, and we're feeling mean
  176. Not a worry for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked on RFID technology in the area of security hardning. and there was one weakness that could not be overcome. ALL rfid tags are suceptable to high intensity RF Fields. Because they rely on the RF field to energise them they can be effectivly fried by subjecting them to an intense field.. There are hardened tags that are more resistant but in the end even they are distructable as well as being much more expensive. I suspect tire manufactures are going to buy the cheapest tag possable.. Sounds like a good market for tag disablers

  177. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    Knowing what tires are on my car is a far cry in comparison to airing my personal information through a plastic baggie. People, please get a clue. Yes, i do care for privacy. I don't want the 8 dollar an hour postman getting my SSN or my banking information through a plastic baggie, that is why I use those security envelopes. However, I could give a shit if a tire company knows that i have their tires on my car.

    The thing about slashdotters is that many of you see in black and white. There is no gray. If I accept this chip in my tire, that must mean that I have no regard for privacy whatsoever and that I would be interested in your afformentioned offer of plastic baggies. NEWSFLASH::Well guess what, there is a gray area!::NEWSFLASH I love my privacy. I cherish my privacy. I love the fact that I can go home, get laid, drink a beer, and watch my semi-right-winged evening news (O'Reilly Factor and Hannity and Colmes!!!) without anyone looking, caring, or questioning me. But to get nervous about an itty-bitty microchip in my tire is just ridiculous.

    What I am trying to say is this: There are some areas of privacy that I am concerned about such as mail transactions, credit card numbers, my SSN (for credit purposes), my banking information, and how much I get paid at my job. However I don't care about a company or a government having knowlegde of my particular car or the tires that are on it. If i have to worry about that, I must be doing something shady and probably deserve to get caught.

    Put down your copy of 1984 for just a minute and come back to the reality that no one cares unless you are doing something illegal.

  178. God damn YRO articles are annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God damn YRO articles are annoying, they're always full of paranoid geeks that know nothing of the new technology, but insist it is bad for their privacy.

  179. D'uh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a little less time geekin and you would realize that tire pressure info is a feature on some cars.
    Similar to the chips being in some tires.

    Drama queens

  180. Sorry but... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..I find this whole 'my rights online' and the associated paranoia hilarious.

    Pretty much every excuse ever given for not having measures like this introduced into products, relates to not getting caught breaking the law!

    Not only that, but it is extreme paranoia.. for example, how do you go from talking about RFID tags in tyres, right up to saying that people will be able to view on the internet whose house you parked at, or which garages you were filling up at? It just wouldn't happen.

    But what about the plus sides? Could RFID tags in all of your tyres, if matched to your VIN number (and consequently your name and address) be useful in tracking stolen cars? Considering the apparent breach of 'my rights', I think that is a pretty useful advantage.

    As far as I see it, in all of these cases if you dont break the law then you have nothing to lose. I am not saying that I dont break the law (who can honestly say they never have) but never to the point where I have risked going to jail, and never to the extreme that I am worried about getting caught.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  181. Moan .... RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    24 inches

  182. RFID tyres != lack of privacy.... RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, why cant you just read what the article says. It does not say 'the serial number will be linked to the vehicles VIN', it says 'the serial number *can* be linked to the vehicles VIN'.

    When you buy tyres ask the garage not to enter your VIN on the form that i assume will come with the tyres. Failing that, go and buy the tyres, and give fake details when you buy them.

    You cant assume just because they could do it, that they will do it.

    And anyhow, if you have nothing to hide, then why should you be worried :P

  183. So we're safe over here for now... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    until they start embedding them in tyres as well.

  184. Re:bar code? something smells. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see what that has to do with someone being able to ID my car from a distance.

    It is technically very difficult to talk to an RFID tag which is zooming by on the highway. It would be much easier to use OCR to read license plates, since you can read them from much greater distances.

  185. Datatag, "antitheft" transponders by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 1

    I have owned several motorbikes and have peppered them all with RFIDs with my own fair hands.

    The product is called "DataTag" and consists of a pack of differing sized/shaped chips and glue/tools to fit them.

    Most of them were small plastic "asprins" that you could cover in glue and then drop into a hole in the frame, insert into the wheel etc.

    My favorite though was a transparent "matchstick" that came with a syringe style applicator to insert into the seat foam, it was totally invisible once fitted.

    The hand scanners cost arout £600 5 years ago, and are probably much cheaper now.

    It did occur to me at the time how easy it would be to "tag" something or someone else.

    As it turned out I was proved right but in a different context. An article in a UK paper had a case of an interesting "practical joke": An employee in a shop "borrowed" an item of a co-workers clothing (possibly jeans) and carefully stitched in security tag in the hem.

    Everytime he went in or out of the shop (and many others) all the alarms went off. How aggravationg is that?!?!

    1. Re:Datatag, "antitheft" transponders by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 1

      And here they are:

      DataTag

  186. Re:2 (is less than) 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    especially when KIA is short for Killed In Action

  187. We need a detector. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that the commercial motivation, I think that it is highly likely that we won't be able to stop the implementation of devices like these.

    Our only protection is to be aware where the RD Tags are (i.e. in our tyres) and when we are being scanned by someone/something.

    Solution:
    An Opensource project to build a handheld scanner, which can also detect when another scanner is operating in our local area.

    When enough people are aware that this scanning is taking place there will be a civil uprising....

  188. Tags a good thing by MrRee · · Score: 1

    These tags are a good thing from a production stand point. Ford is required to record which plant a tire came from, when that tire was produced, and which car it's being installed on. Right now, this is a manual process and fairly costly. The embedded tags will make it an automatic process and less prone to errors. The requirement to record this information evolved from the Explorer/Firestone troubles.

    The tags will also stop a rather disturbing problem in the rental car business. People sometimes rent a car, exchange the good tires for bad, and return the car to the agency. Without the tags, there's no traceability.

    A similar process exists for airbags and ignition keys. These databases are NOT available to anyone including the dealers, so I fail to see how privacy is an issue.

    BTW: The tires installed by Ford are of a higher quaility then the same exact tire available after market. They are produced to tighter specifications. Believe it or not.

    1. Re:Tags a good thing by MrRee · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention the only information contained in these tags is tire type, manufacturing plant, and manufacturing date. VIN information is NOT stored in the tag.

  189. Tyres tied to the VIN? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

    Where do they say that they register _who_ buys each tyre?
    Sure the tyres have a RFID, it's just like a big barcode on them, they can be tracked during manufacture and sale.
    When was the last time your VIN was checked when you bought a new set of tyres?

  190. Re:Trackability of tires by hobo2k · · Score: 1
    Still, iirc, the article implied every tire would have a unique id. For recall tracking, it seems you only need the id to reference the particular factory/line and day or hour of production. Then, if there are 100's or 1000's of other tires with the same id, this definately couldn't be a privacy issue. eh?

    Not that I really care either way.

  191. Re:bar code? something smells. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
    Tell me why the company can't paint a nice little white bar coded serial number on the side of the tire?

    (Disclaimer: I don't know a damn.)

    Such barcodes would not be aesthetically pleasing. Also, the tires have the tendency to get dirty, and barcodes are read optically. So, to read the big ugly barcode, you'd need to bring a water hose, but RFIDs can be read through the muck. Also, the RFID tag can be embedded in the material, but the barcode needs to be *painted* on the surface, meaning it can (theoretically) be worn off.

    Yes, barcodes might work, but RFIDs would be theoretically more hadly messed and would probably be a little bit more convinient to use.

  192. London Congestion Charge by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    In a months time, they will track all cars going in and out of central London, and send bills to those who haven't paid the congestion charge. This is a large scale use of video cameras and OCR and databases.

  193. Much ado about nothing by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

    This is very much like somebody waving a wand over your tire and informing you that you should consider changing your tires due to (recall, treadwear, insert reason here) not because the man is tracking your every move. Until technology gets to the point that GPS is tied to RFDs and is downloaded to a master computer big enough to track the millions upon millions of movements every day. This is not a big deal.

    I worry more about my local supermarket tracking my purchases via my discount card than this issue.

    My 2 cents.

  194. Folks... by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to point out that, my own posting included, the total number of words wasted through using the name Ford in order to save keystrokes is 179 (see whole thread).

    Thanks for your attention.

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  195. Pressure by Governerd · · Score: 1

    According to the article, pressure monitoring is actually one of the functions of this thing. As for the Big Brother aspect, I am willing to bet that your typical neighborhood tire shop owner will have no problem with accidentally overlooking the data update when changing your tires.

  196. London congestion charge - OCR license plates by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Will go live in February... The signs and cameras are up already.

    http://www.cclondon.com/

    and some of the resistance which is beginning.

    http://www.btinternet.com/~robert.hinkley/opinio n/ congestion.html

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  197. And how to confuse the cameras... by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1



    http://www.geocities.com/congestioncharge/freelo nd on.html

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  198. The system is already in place... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but then readers would be required nation-wide which is costly to say the least. The resaon 'automated roads' have been back-burnered is the astronomical expense of implementing it in any large scale.

    Well go to traffic.com and you can see up to the minute traffic info for most of the US metro areas. They have installed sensors every 1/4 to 2 miles in damn near all freeways and a number of streets. Just 1000 feet away from me right now is one of those things in the street to trigger the new traffic signal "for better traffic flow" and monitoring by the city. It would take very little to add 1 more sensor for RFID data to be passed back over the same system...

  199. Quantity turns into quality by varjag · · Score: 1

    Funny or not, but the worst thing that gathering data from these devices, unlike from numberplates, can be trivially automated.

    Police checkpoints that may glance on your numberplate is one thing, but tight country-wide network of sensors on earch crossroad makes a perfect Big Brother.

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
  200. You're right and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...don't forget that cars are usually made of metal. It should be specially dificult to read an RFID passive tag that's rounded by all that metallic stuff because the most power of the antena will be lost before it could feed the RFID device.

    This is simply an alarmist issue from/for those whose has very limited knowledgement about RFID.

    Excuse my poor english.

  201. Re:Please post (anonymously) the name of co and bo by grundie · · Score: 1

    AND, no doubt, led to the resignation of some of the company's best talent (perhaps including yourself).

    I went off to University, thankfully! Most of the people working here came thrugh a training scheme run by the company owner. He was being given money by the government to train these people (all 16-17 year olds) and then he was given a subsidy to employ them! No wonder the only programming language used was Visual Basic.

    The company was called Barr IT Services, run and owned by a very shrewd local businessman called Pete Barr. He sold the business to a crowd based in Belfast called Sx3 just before the dot.com bust for a significant sum (they had branched out in to web development previously). The new owners have a great reputation and aparently since being assimilated in to Sx3 the company has become a much fancied place to work in.

    Pete Barr still runs lots of local businesses here in Derry, he has a horrendous reputaion locally. There is little that could be done to hurt him. As if you would want to, he spent several years in prison in the 70's for directing terrorism, he's a real tough nut.

  202. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I must be doing something shady and probably deserve to get caught"

    Well, that is the point. You might be chased and hunted down one day, say for 'simple' matters such as downloading a copyrighted MP3. The fact that these things are on tires, means that soon, I WON'T BE ABLE TO GO ANYWHERE WITHOUT PEOPLE KNOWING WHERE I AM.

  203. ... No big deal by pr0c · · Score: 1

    Several issues are ignored here...

    1.) Its illegal to distribute personal information (I'm fairly certain) without your consent, so michelin will not be giving out these RFIDS
    2.) Even if its not illegal to distribute it certainaly is unethical and will/can killl a business... odds are they wouldn't attempt it
    3.) Many everyday things already have RFID placed in them, such as car keys and some credit cards etc.
    4.) RFID must be scanned from within a few feet (on a good day), simply driving down the road they cannot be scanned in a reasonable manner. Not to mention that a 'good' scanner will not read at rates above 50 mph or so.
    5.) RFID will make it far easier and cheaper to track a tire from assembly line to junk yard, it will help the company improve its product acheive better efficiency.


    Its rediculis to think that your losing rights here... it takes ignorance to believe that.

    1. Re:... No big deal by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Do you really believe what you wrote??
      See my post about loop detectors.
      In my industry they are already set to read RFID with in ground loop detectors to open industrial electric gates. This is old hat.

      Check around google and you'll see what I mean.
      For the city/state/big bro to read the RFID in a car, not just the tires, is oh so simple and oh so cheap and oh so in place....

  204. Time to wrap my tires in tin-foil! by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it will hamper my traction?

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  205. How long till they act like Lexmark? by ToastyKen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How long will it be before the car authenticates the chip in the tire so you can only use authorized brands of tires? If a third party makes a compatible tire, the car manufacturer can sue them for "hacking into our Tire Management System"....

  206. Microwave them, fry the RFID Presto. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh, if the Air Force can use microwaves to fry computers, why can we? Pick up a 5Ghz or better microwave radio link, and point it at your tires for a few. Ever put metal in the microwave?

  207. Re:bar code? something smells. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    "Most recalls are silent"

    For safety recalls, the owner gets letters. They send the letter repeatedly if you don't respond.

    Performance recalls get tech service bulletins posted for the shop mechanics. That's a completely different deal.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  208. Re:RFID tyres != lack of privacy.... RTFA by praedor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you don't do anything wrong, why worry about illegal searches? Why seal envelopes when you mail them? Why EVER use PGP? Why encrypt, period? What are you trying to hide criminal?


    Never EVER use any iteration of the phrase, "If you don't do anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about." That is the road to zero civil liberties. That is the road to Police State.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  209. Mechanics become hackers by maddogsparky · · Score: 1
    How long do you really think it would take before someone figures out an easy way to disable the RF tag before mounting the tire? Anybody that feels they need to disable this device will probably be able to do so quite easily. Everyone else probably won't care.

    I'm guessing that the intent of the tags is not to invade your privacy, but to just make it simpler for the car companies and their suppliers to collect data about things like tire wear (did the tires last as long as they should), theft (were these tires reported stolen from another vehicle), and warranty abuse (was this tire returned after it was in an accident). Doesn't sound like an invasion of privacy for its own sake, rather, data collection for determining quality and cost cutting opportunities.

    I've got more than enough to think about already in the area of privacy concerns (identity theft, etc.). I'm not worried about RF tags in my tires.

    --
    science is a religion
  210. Good use for michelin tires by Alehandro · · Score: 0

    Well from now on I'll use Michelin tires for burn out compo on car show. They even can make a new compo. Burn your tires without frying the chip.

  211. Privacy invasion? by aonaran · · Score: 1

    try insurance benefit. I see this as no different than VIN #'s etched in the window glass.

  212. Garage by AlgUSF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What would be cool is if your driveway could have a sensor in it that reads the RFID on your tire and automatically open the garage door for you. No more worrying who has the remote.

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    1. Re:Garage by Nobo · · Score: 1
      Hmmm. I think GTA3 did a tech demo of this.

      God only knows how they updated the list of stolen VIDs so quickly, though...

  213. think a bit more by agentk · · Score: 1

    1. What is the range of these RFIDs? In my experience, they tend to be maybe 50 yards max.

    2. You VIN is written on your dashboard such that it can be easily read from the outside through the windshield.

    This would certainly make stealing tires or selling tires second hand a bit more difficult though.

    --

    VOS/Interreality project: www.interreality.org

  214. Condoms already have serial numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet you never noticed that though... you have to roll them down pretty far.

  215. They can (and do) already do this... by endoboy · · Score: 1

    Sure they can--three methods already in use:

    1) liscense plate + video camera + OCR software
    2) toll transponder tag
    3) cell phone (not as geographically accurate for now, but E-911 is changing this, give them time...)

    and, as an added bonus for the tinfoil hat crowd, in Massachusetts there have been issues with bars scanning the mag strip on drivers liscenses...

  216. UHF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The tire maker has begun testing a UHF
    > transponder that it adapted for use inside
    > rubber sidewalls.

    Damn. That explains why my TV's been changing channels by itself every time a car goes by...

  217. Re:Automation is the key - not by itsyourunclebill · · Score: 1

    Well, at least we have some good information coming out of this forum. Having lived a sheltered life, I always figured that tires and tyres were the same thing and somebody was just using king's english to be funny. It would now appear that there are significant differences in that most new tires in the U.S. come with a 40,000 to 60,000 mile warranty whereas tyres are only good for 15,000 miles. Could you just imagine the problems we would be encountering if we had tyre dumps fill of these chips instead of tire dumps full? Some poor cop driving by could concieveably suffer serious information overload. Another good point - with the problems they've been having would Firestone want to install these. Imagine the problems if people had tire ID readers and wouldn't car pool with a Firestone equipped car or Johnny's mom wouldn't let him ride to little league..... With tyres we could conceiveably be on the hook for larger potential fines. If they ever get to be considered hazardous waste the guy who took that $3.00 disposal fee when you got new tyres just dumped them instead of registering them into the national tyre disposal database and using a federally approved tyre disposal site. You now have 4 times the potential fine. Finally, I'd need two sets of tyres a year on that gas guzzling SUV I drive and it would be like "change the tyres and see if it needs gas" No, better they stick to putting chips in tires and leave the tyre issue alone. Can you imagine the stigma at the country club if you showed up in your #50,000 SUV and had a cheap set of Peerless tyres show up on a scanner instead of a $1100 set of Michelins. And they say we Americans just stick our heads in the sand (or somewhere else) and look for oil.

  218. Re:Automation is the key - not by itsyourunclebill · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, and the only tires I've ever had "go off" were on a tire changer. I can't speak for what happens with tyres.

  219. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Interesting how this article now appears on the same page as a story about a military EMP weapon which destroys electronics with microwave pulses. I predict a rise in business specializing in the "sanitization" of items which have embedded RF tx devices.

  220. Re:Good bye privacy. SOONER, not later. by shepd · · Score: 1

    > However, I could give a shit if a tire company knows that i have their tires on my car.

    Neither could I, but the technology to read these tags isn't only something the tire manufacturers have access to, is it?

    So, let's see how I could get that precious SSN, credit card numbers, and other goodies from your tire ID:

    I set up a covert tire reading station beside the road. I make it look like one of those cable boxes you see at the end of many people's properties. I get your tire ID.

    Now, of course, (insert gas company here) has your tire ID for easier billing. I get on the phone with an agent who is less than awake, and con him into giving me your info (phone number, street address, name, DOB). If you don't think that's possible, ask Kevin Mitnick.

    Now I have enough to ask for a history of your car, for crashes and liens. I just tell them I'm interested in buying it. No problem. On there, I get your VIN tag and license plate number. Now, with all that official info, all I need is someone a little crooked at the DMV, and bingo! I've got an SSN and License. From there I can get anything I want about you, credit reports, credit card numbers, heck, I bet I could get the deeds to your house screwed up if I was nasty enough!

    Sure, I could have walked up to your car and written the plate number and VIN down, but it wouldn't take long for my suspicious activity to be reported, whereas a tire ID tag reader will never be noticed, and even if it was, I doubt there'd be complaints.

    Hope that helps explain it to you.

    >Put down your copy of 1984 for just a minute and come back to the reality that no one cares unless you are doing something illegal.

    Let me bring you back to reality. It ain't just the government you need to worry about. But I suppose you'll consider that a load of bunk. Well, go ahead. It's your life. Live it as you will.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  221. Tyre Pressure monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Further to the posts about many cars having tyre pressure monitors, I read an article about a year ago about BMW testing out tyre /traction/ sensors. The RF sensors in the tyre walls detected the tyre deformation. These worked along with the ABS wheel speed sensors so that the ABS could predict /when/ a wheel was going to lose traction (in existing ABS systems this is just a function of wheel speed and pedal pressure... which doesn't compensate for road condition).

    I've tried to find this, but haven't come up with anything. It was probably a print article.

  222. Too Bad The Way Around That Won't Work With Tires? by Interrobang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend of mine has a grocery store card and a credit card, incidentally, in the name of his SCA persona. Scary thing is...Lord So-and-So has better credit than he does -- and more grocery store points -- and he never gets telemarketing calls... (Name changed to protect the devious, of course.) Now how does one take that lesson and apply it to tires?

  223. OCR license plate readers by Pius+II. · · Score: 1

    For all those guys who are going to doubt that license plate readers are feasible: in Bavaria, employing automatic scanners at the czech-german border is currently being discussed. ( http://www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/0,1518,224854,0 0.html if you speak german). Employing the scanners for traffic and speed control is also planned.

  224. Renault cars have tyre pressure monitors by yb · · Score: 1

    Michelin Tyre pressure monitors are already mounted on Renault cars. (Renault cars are sold everywhere in the world expect USA) see : http://www.renault.com/gb/produits/laguna2.htm

  225. Before you freak out about Big Brother ... by ces · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all remember a RFID tag is useless without a reader. No reader in range, no ID. Second, the scan range is somewhat limited. It's going to be difficult to scan the tags from anywhere other than inside the vehicle when it's moving.

    This has some advantages for the consumer beyond the inventory and supply chain management improvements for Michelin.

    For one it will be easier to spot counterfit Michelin tires. Before you scoff be aware this is a big problem for Michelin and some other high end tire makers. It is not uncommon to buy a brand name tire and get a phony tire made overseas or a re-tread sold as new.

    Another application would be to embed multiple tags to indicate tire wear. When certain tags wear away you will know the tire needs to be replaced.

    Imaging the RFID tags were combined with pressure and temprature gauges. This would allow you to know this from inside the car while it was moving.

    I doubt the "Man" is going to go around installing RFID readers everywhere just because one tire maker with a small slice of the market starts putting tags in their tires. Besides all you get when you get when you read a RFID tag is a number. A unique number to be sure, but without a lookup to the various supply chain databases a fairly meaningless number.

    --
    Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    1. Re:Before you freak out about Big Brother ... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Do you know what a "loop detector" is??
      Ever notice those loops cut in the concrete and tarred in??

      There is a wire loop in the concrete at millions of intersections all over the world right now.
      They detect changes in the magnetic field when cars pass over them. That's how they count traffic and know when cars are sitting at lights.

      If there are no cars over the loop the OTHER lights stay green much longer, usually until a car drives up to the red light and passes over the loop. The change in the magnetic field triggers the circuits to cycle the traffic lights.

      I install these things for industrial electric gate openers, same exact electronics. It will be EXTREMELY EASY to read the RFID tags in tires with these loop detectors just by adding some very cheap equipment into the existing system, which by the way, happens to already be networked into a central traffic control computer....

      Hmmmm......

  226. Re:bar code? something smells. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    How is a tire shop going to check the serial number of a single tire, when every tire in range answers?

    Easy, make the range only a few inches.

    You have a license plate on your car, and there's an etched VIN on your dashboard. You register both numbers in the local motor vehicle database. I don't understand how you would use these RFID tags for anything but recall or warranty information. They certainly aren't a privacy issue, because you won't have your name or any identification associated with the ID in any database, especially if you happen to install the tires yourself.

  227. Why the f!ck is this modded as "funny"? by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    Whoever this AC is, he is RIGHT, damnit! I remember when he posted this, several months back - and he WAS modded down. I thought maybe he was a crackpot, though what he said could possibly be true - so I looked, yeah - I googled on the info, and...

    IT IS REAL - EVERYTHING HE POSTED WAS REAL - damnit, mod this up, as informative!

    I can't believe how many people here are saying "what is the big deal", "this won't affect you", and "think of how this could help the children (eh, words to that effect)" - WE KNOW THIS WON'T BE THE CASE, THAT THIS TECHNOLOGY WILL BE USED *AGAINST* THE CITIZENS!!!

    How loud must I say it? How many times must this be repeated? How much more will people take? Why do you (for some reason) enjoy being ass-raped by corporate and governmental PIGS? BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE DOING?

    I am so SICK of hearing about this abuse, and that abuse, and corporate scandals - yet not seeing any action, not seeing any resolution - when we all know if any one of *US* pulled the same shit at our job or in our personal lives, the shaft would be so long and go so deep we would speared and sliding FOREVER - yet we nary give pause, and in some case, hearty slaps on the backs - to those who hold positions of power and prestige.

    Sometimes I pray for one good sized asteroid to hit, just to stop the insanity we have come to live with every day...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  228. Re:Not all rdif tags are killed by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a coat, and stuck on the zipper was a clip w. an rdif tag embedded. The clip had "please remove this tag before wearing the article". Why? Because there's no reliable way to kill some types of rdif tags and make sure they STAY dead. They are simple, el cheapo passive devices with no moving parts. Much harder to kill than, say, your monitor.

  229. And you're worried about the tires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry because.. soon every spare component in your car from windshield to brake pedal will come with embedded RFID tags which cost only a few cents each.

  230. Unique IDs by Metropolitan · · Score: 1

    If you look closely on your tires, they're likely already stamped with a unique ID. I bought some last year that had an ID the clerk at the store had to record, ostensibly for recall purposes.

  231. Your VIN is visible to anyone outside your car... by tgd · · Score: 1

    If not all cars, most cars have the VIN displayed in a sticker at the very front of the dash, next to the A-pillar. You can read it through the windshield. Many also have a barcode of it there.

    Want to steal a car easily? Go peek in the front window, get the VIN number, and find a minimum-wage kid in a dealer parts department and give him fifty bucks to cut you a key for it. There's only 20-30 keys for a given car model -- they may have one in stock anyway, and they know which key you have based on your VIN number.

    VIN numbers are totally public info.

  232. idiotic ways your privacy can be invaded today by valisk · · Score: 1
    I agree they can track to a large but limited extent what I do now, however in 5 years when this tech has matured they will be able to track everybody in a ruthlessly efficient manner and easily share this data with anybody willing to pay for it.
    That will quite simply lead to abuses, and yes you can probably learn a lot of what you want from these data cds
    But an active RF technology would mean a bug in every car.
    Maybe the idea of an adboard on a freeway is insane ;) but what about an adboard at the end of your road, waiting for you to go to work that morning, it might be far fetched but not too far fetched, and maybe the cable company you pay will create an ad schedule just for you.
    What we need to do it think about how this technology will affect us in the future, especialy given the current corporate big idea of synergising databases, and decide how we are going to deal with it.
    These data lists on CDs might tell you that I subscribe to Private Eye magazine and you could imagine that I might like to buy your satirical magazine also and ring me to tell me so, but they dont tell you that I spent 30 minutes last week reading lastminute.com looking for a flight to new york or that I browsed bushmaster arms website and two months ago downloaded a copy of the anarchists cookbook. Taken altogether it could paint a picture of somone with some nasty ideas, and could possibly save some lives, it could also lead to me recieving emails or phone calls from 7 different flight booking agencies each trying to undercut the other, and insurance sales guys, then when I finaly get to New York, and the RF transmitter in my shoes allows the police to remotely monitor me, and guide agents to give me a special full body cavity check, a thief acting on information his cracker friend got from breaking into the police databank robs my house.

    Thanks by the way for the backhanded compliment, its nice to see that you at least found it creative in some way :)

    --

    Economic Left/Right: -0.62
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    1. Re:idiotic ways your privacy can be invaded today by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I agree they can track to a large but limited extent what I do now, however in 5 years when this tech has matured they will be able to track everybody in a ruthlessly efficient manner and easily share this data with anybody willing to pay for it.

      You just don't understand that all of this is available today. Anybody who wants to pay for it can get it. End of story, nothing new to see here, move along.

      Thanks by the way for the backhanded compliment, its nice to see that you at least found it creative in some way :)

      Creative, yes. But again, there are so many ways around privacy invasion that RFID tires on your vehicle shouldn't hit the bar. You do realize no one in the world would care about RFID tires if there were transmitter boxes in cars similar to whta the rental cars use? RFID are a pointless step in doing only what they are designed to do. Other methods are worth getting worked up for, this is just pointless.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:idiotic ways your privacy can be invaded today by valisk · · Score: 1

      Very well, I shall accept your correction to my ignorance and move along :)

      --

      Economic Left/Right: -0.62
      Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
  233. tire RFID zappers by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is what those $150.00 directed energy devices are good for.

  234. Public database of officers tires! by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    come now, I want to put a amplifer on every intersection on the way to my work, so I can tell when that officer is heading to his favorite speed trap.

    I always wanted a easy way to identify a officer with his radio and radar gun off.

  235. Zounds! You're right. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    Cheap RFID tags

    I had no idea they were so cheap. I did some research and found the above link.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  236. Re:Would work just like a cookie by NetBoy · · Score: 1

    Seems to me this would work just like a
    cookie. All it would take is one cross
    reference to tie you to the tire, either
    the initial purchase, a visit to ATM
    or whatever.

    Bear in mind that federal law makes driver's
    license information available to toll collectors,
    law enforcement and "security" businesses.

    This IDs you and tracks you better than a cell
    phone. I'd worry about the government of
    course, but first to take advantage of this
    will be the clickshare equivalents embedding
    scanners in every drive through. But they
    wouldn't sell or use this information.

    Of course, if you have nothing to hide,
    then who needs privacy.

  237. Have you guys read the article? by falsified · · Score: 1
    They're struggling to make it possible for a device to read the information from 24 inches away. You guys are worried about this thing transmitting your VIN; if someone is 24 inches (or less) away from your car, they can just look at the VIN printed clearly on the front of your car. Additionally, the tires will cost extra and customers are being given the OPTION of buying this particular breed of tires. Do I think it's pretty stupid for there to be electronic devices in my tire? You bet. Do I think it would be easier to be provided with a "made on" date printed directly on the tire? Hell yeah. But if I were truly concerned about my privacy, I wouldn't be driving around with metallic plates identifying me as the owner of the car, my address, etc.

    Anyway, how hard would it be to remove the device?

    --
    HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.