Slashdot Mirror


Carmack Needs Rocket Fuel

Reality Master 101 writes "Saw an interesting post on the Experimental Rocket Propulsion Society BBS from John Carmack, who is working on an X-prize vehicle. Apparently he is having a lot of trouble getting Peroxide from the major suppliers, and is possibly thinking of helping someone set up a company to produce peroxide. With NASA's recent problems, there has been a lot of talk about promoting more private investment in rocketry. But how can it happen when the suppliers won't even sell peroxide to well financed, registered, X-prize teams? Anyone want to start a peroxide business?"

396 of 592 comments (clear)

  1. What kind? by hether · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry for the ignorance. What kind of peroxide is necessary for something like this?

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    1. Re:What kind? by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hydrogen peroxide - H2O2.

    2. Re:What kind? by jdh-22 · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen Peroxide? The stuff that cleans your wounds?!

      --
      Every Super Villan uses Linux.
    3. Re:What kind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hydrogen peroxide can be used as a mono-propelant (A 70% pure mix run through a catalyst screen to form steam and O2), or a bi-propellant (mixed with a hydrocarbon to form steam and CO2). Check out erps.org for info on H2O2 rocketry.

      Thank you for your time,
      Frank Russo

    4. Re:What kind? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      hydrogen peroxide, in very high concentration.

    5. Re:What kind? by pyrofx · · Score: 1

      90% of higher of Hydrogen Peroxide it what they need plenty of. Just keep it off of anything remotely organic least your find your parts itchin' an' a burnin'. X DARS member.

    6. Re:What kind? by Xacid · · Score: 1

      At first I was thinking regular hydrogen peroxide, but then I was like "wait...this is the geek place, they wouldn't call it just "peroxide". If it's not x-peroxide, then it's just peroxide which is O2 which just happens to be freely available in the air as a gas. Yeah, I'm a bit confused as well.

    7. Re:What kind? by space_hippy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Almost pure hydrogen peroxide 85 - 95 percent.
      The peroxide that people find at the drug store is 3 percent.
      The stuff used in rocket engines is extremely caustic, in other words it will burn any organic matter (read skin, muscle, bone, etc.) on contact.
      Not to mention the Department of Transportation doens't like it moving over their highways.

    8. Re:What kind? by PD · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, except at 95-100% concentration. The stuff that cleans your wounds is 3%.

    9. Re:What kind? by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1, Informative
      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    10. Re:What kind? by Laven · · Score: 1

      High concentration of oxygen I think, in a form safer than traditional rocket fuel.

    11. Re:What kind? by Ptahian · · Score: 1, Informative
      It's not the kind that you buy in the drug store!

      It's MUCH more concentrated.

      Here's a page describing the grades.

      http://www.h2o2-4u.com/grades.html/a

    12. Re:What kind? by bughunter · · Score: 5, Informative
      Probably Hydrogen Peroxide, H2O2.

      When I worked for American Rocket Company in 1988-89, we used 80% Hydrogen Peroxide as fuel for our thrust vector control system. Sixteen injectors at the throat of the main engine nozzle under computer control squirted H2O2 into the plume and it deflected the plume, and therefore the thrust, by enough to steer a rocket.

      This was really nasty stuff. IIRC, the only place we could get it was Germany, and we had to jump through all kinds of transportation safety hoops just to get it over here. 80% is a very high concentration, I don't know if Carmack needs this much or not. Peroxide you get at the drug store is 3% H2O2 and 97% H2O.

      One of the test valves came back from our engine test site at Edwards and we rinsed it thoroughly with water. Still, when I handled it, traces of the peroxide burned my skin. Very nasty, very painful.

      We also worked with other cool stuff like LOX (oxidizer), Silane (for ignition), and my favorite gas, Nitrous Oxide (another oxidizer, self-pressurizing and fun at parties!). I still have a hunk of polybutadiene rocket fuel on my desk as a souvenier; we used to cast that stuff into all kinds of fun shapes, including some you wouldn't be able to show your mother.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    13. Re:What kind? by brer_rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny
      Sorry for the ignorance. What kind of peroxide is necessary for something like this?

      Considering it's a bunch of pimple-faced geeks, benzoyl peroxide.

    14. Re:What kind? by iamnarada · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen Peroxide, around 85% concentration. Note that this is not the 3% h2o2 available from the drug store. Usually it has to be bought in bulk and has an added expense in that is must be shipped as a hazardous material as it is a very potent oxidizer. Check out h2o2.org for info.

    15. Re:What kind? by steelerguy · · Score: 1

      it is for all the burns they are going to get while working with rocket fuel... :/

    16. Re:What kind? by PD · · Score: 1

      That must have been one smelly rocket if it burned rubber as fuel. Interesting trick with the thrusters though, seems like it might be a lot simpler than an engine gimbal.

    17. Re:What kind? by bughunter · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, if you wouldn't be a jerk, you would give us credit for having recognizing that for ourselves.

      We used gasoline.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    18. Re:What kind? by bughunter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Usually not. Complete combustion resulted in white smoke that was mostly CO, CO2, H2O, etc.

      But during engine development, acoustic instabilities would cause the hybrid motor to spit out flaming chunks of rubber, and they smouldered and stank something fierce.

      Actually, though, hybrid engines can be relatively clean, and are especially safe. While we were testing at Edwards, some Rocketdyne guys died when they dropped a section of solid rocket motor and it exploded. Our motor would have just bounced.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    19. Re:What kind? by aralin · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I know that a hand with burned skin makes people realize things quite fast (especially that they were stupid and this is not the way to go), but you could have made some pointer of what you did to avoid it next time in your post. :)

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    20. Re:What kind? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      hmmm....

      Thats really interesting. I wonder if you could use one of these types of engines coupled to the Steam Powered Underwater Jet Engine

      It would be really awesome to see this tried - although I dont know how much peroxide would be required to produce enough for distance travelling etc....

      but still no doubt a perfect match for an experiment.

    21. Re:What kind? by ryanh50 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interesting video about the effects of H202 on clothing. The leather shoe displays an amazing reaction in less thant 2 minutes Test Video

    22. Re:What kind? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1, Funny
      we used to cast that stuff into all kinds of fun shapes, including some you wouldn't be able to show your mother.

      If you don't think your mother knows about (and probably enjoys) sex, you don't understand the pre-requisites of motherhood.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    23. Re:What kind? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1

      U used pure gasoline to finish the process, or you tried to mix it into the water (the latter sounds kinda silly). I would have expected the use of something like a methanol mix in the later stages of cleaning.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    24. Re:What kind? by Skater · · Score: 1

      It's just *feels* pure when it's working...

      (Actually, there are worse ones than H2O2. Just not as common.)

    25. Re:What kind? by PD · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, why did you use rubber instead of something else?

      Can you use plastic, epoxy resin, asphalt, sugar, or horsehair? All of those things will definitely burn under an oxygen atmosphere, but rubber must be special somehow for you to choose it.

    26. Re:What kind? by Erris · · Score: 1
      It would be really awesome to see this tried - although I dont know how much peroxide would be required to produce enough for distance travelling etc....

      Ask the crew of the Kursk.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    27. Re:What kind? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      This was really nasty stuff.

      There are no nice oxidisers suitable for rocketry. Hydrogen Peroxide is about the best of a bad bunch. Even LOX tends to detonate in contact with hydrocarbons (soak into tarmac=contact explosive), freezes moisture from the air to block valves, and hang on the outside of the rocket- rockets have been lost due to the properties of LOX.

      In contrast peroxide is storable for years, and is essentially non toxic, although you wouldn't want to drink it.

      Still, when I handled it, traces of the peroxide burned my skin. Very nasty, very painful.

      Yes. However you're still alive and probably unscarred. If you'd have done the same thing with the Space Shuttle's OMS oxidiser, you would not still be with us I fear.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    28. Re:What kind? by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 1

      I believe there had been some experimentation with using hydrogen peroxide as a propellant on submarines back in the early part of the century -- they were basically jet-powered subs. They were very fast, possibly faster than most nuclear subs of today, but I suspect they used up fuel pretty quickly.

    29. Re:What kind? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      In contrast peroxide is storable for years, and is essentially non toxic, although you wouldn't want to drink it.

      As long as you store it in those little brown plastic bottles so that light won't decompose it.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    30. Re:What kind? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Actually, though, hybrid engines can be relatively clean, and are especially safe.

      Science@NASA put up an article last Friday about a hybrid rocket under development that uses paraffin as fuel. The technology is presented as a potential throttleable replacement for the Shuttle SRBs.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    31. Re:What kind? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      In other words, the thing that would be interesting to inject into someones blood. :-) Everyone who'd seen the reaction of H202 and blood know what I'm talking about. ;-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    32. Re:What kind? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I would have expected the use of something like a methanol mix in the later stages of cleaning.

      I'd have made the FNG handle it. (FNG = Fucking New Guy)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    33. Re:What kind? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      In other words, the thing that would be interesting to inject into someones blood. :-) Everyone who'd seen the reaction of H202 and blood know what I'm talking about. ;-)

      Care to tell us what happens? As I'm not too keen on setting up an experiment myself, for obvious reasons.

    34. Re:What kind? by RapaNui · · Score: 1

      In normal composite solid propellants, the rubber is a binder that holds the whole mess together and in shape.
      The most common is 'PBAN' - Polybutadiene- acrylonitrile (IIRC).
      The propellant also contains an oxidizer (obviously not in a hybrid), such as ammonium perchlorate, and a thermic agent (to increase combustion temperature) - aluminium, for example.

      There are also a whole bunch of other bits'n pieces, like plasticizers, and other additives to ease handling and casting.

    35. Re:What kind? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen peroxide reacts with the blood very quickly and create an expanding white mess. :-)

      I was shown an experiment of it several years ago on a bucket of animal blood (don't ask). They put a little H2O2 in the bucket and it expanded to a bubbling white mess of something like 10x the size in a matter of seconds.

      I think it was pretty concentrated H2O2 though since I hear it's used to clean wounds etc. Probably is related to the reaction, but in a smaller, healthier scale.

      Here, I found something for you:

      "A number of substances are known to cause oxidation in the body but
      the most important of these is Hydrogen Peroxide. Hydrogen Peroxide,
      when exposed to your blood or other body fluids, containing the enzyme
      'Catalase', is chemically split into OXYGEN and water. Remember how
      Hydrogen Peroxide foams when you put it on a wound? The foam is OXYGEN
      being produced by the action of catalase on the Hydrogen Peroxide. A
      small amount of Hydrogen Peroxide can supply large amounts of OXYGEN
      to the tissue."

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    36. Re:What kind? by sk8king · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and technically, hydrogen peroxide is H202..two hydrogens and two oxygens per molecule.

      Two hydrogens also means it is technically dihydrogen, just as water is dihydrogen monoxide. I don't know what defines peroxide....I would guess H2O2 would be dihydrogen dioxide, but I haven't taken chemistry in 14 years so what do I know.

    37. Re:What kind? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      Per means that it's more, so H2O is Dihydrogen oxide (no mon), and H2O2 is Dihydrogen PERoxide.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    38. Re:What kind? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Rocketdyne guys died when they dropped a section of solid rocket motor and it exploded.

      Did I just hear someone say "Oops"?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    39. Re:What kind? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      Thats what I was thinking... but if the Jet mentioned in the slashdot story earlier uses less steam to produce the same amount of hydro-thrust than a sub being pushed by steam converted to mechanical power - or other forward motion (aside from the said Jet), then its a good thing.

  2. hair salons by Mordac · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm guessing getting all the hair salons to chip in a gallon or two won't help here will it. Worth a shot I guess.

    1. Re:hair salons by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1
      I considered that also, but then I realized that those hair products often cause streaking, which I'm sure Carmack doesn't want.

      --gal

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    2. Re:hair salons by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      If Madonna doesn't kill you, Courtney Love will. I'm sure they're both active on /. so you best be watching your back.

    3. Re:hair salons by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

      I'm believe that the [hydrogen]? peroxide salons use is in an extremely watered down version.

      --
      0xfeedface
    4. Re:hair salons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      [offtopic]
      My sister had a friend who thought that people used bleach to bleach their hair and tried it herself. I don't think there was any permanent damage.
      [/offtopic]

    5. Re:hair salons by brandorf · · Score: 1

      Wrong kind of peroxide, I believe (can't get into the article, so I can't verify) Hydrogen peroxide is the kind used in hair salons (h2o2). I believe Benzoyl Peroxide is the stuff they need for fuel.

      --


      Bork Bork Bork!!
    6. Re:hair salons by stendec · · Score: 5, Funny
      One day, a story was posted on Slashdot stating that Carmack needs rocket fuel. A rallying cry was quickly taken up.

      PEROXIDE FOR CARMACK! shouted the geeks, sometimes at their monitor, sometimes at their cat, sometimes at their lunch.

      It was only the second time since the Karma-for-Guns campaign that Slashdot gained the attention of the public.

      PEROXIDE FOR CARMACK! shouted the public, sometimes at their spouse, sometimes at the television, sometimes to the telemarketer.

      And soon did legislators of the United States take up the cry, carrying the battle to the floor of the Congress itself.

      PEROXIDE FOR CARMACK! shouted the legislators, sometimes at each other, sometimes at the TV cameras, sometimes at their aides.

      And soon did the President of the United States take up the cry, carrying the fight to the United Nations General Assembly.

      PEROXIDE FOR CARMACK! the president would shout, sometimes at France, sometimes at Germany, sometimes at the teleprompter.

      And soon did the world take up the cry, rousing its collective might and pooling together a vast supply of peroxide which was soon delivered to the house of John Carmack. The only man who might have objected was Hans Blix, but the last anyone saw him, he was staring into the mirror, nodding his head slowly and sighing.

      And so, one day, Carmack was driving John Romero back from the hair salon. His old friend was raving about this new catalyzing-gel they use. Romero then opened the door, and that's the last anyone saw him. They say the explosion was like "two hundred thousand quad-damaged rocket jumps."

    7. Re:hair salons by ocie · · Score: 1

      I think the Hydrogen Peroxide used for rocket propulsion is much stronger than what you find in the drug store or hair salon. You need special tanks that inhibit its reactivity, and if a small piece of metal comes in contact with it. kablammo!!!

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    8. Re:hair salons by justinstreufert · · Score: 1
      Er.. Is this a troll? If so, sorry.


      Benzoyl Peroxide is an acne medication. They are definitely looking for H2O2...


      Justin

      --
      "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
    9. Re:hair salons by Darlington · · Score: 1
      PEROXIDE FOR CARMACK! the president would shout

      Considering that after a few years at Yale and countless hours of coaching he still can't pronounce "nuclear" (nukeyular?), I kind of doubt his speechwriters will ever toss him a word as complicated as "peroxide".

    10. Re:hair salons by Shads · · Score: 1

      If my memory is serving the stuff they use in salons is about 18%... definetly no more than 30%. Fun stuff actually, if you leave it in your hair long enough your hair turns to slime and falls off.

      --
      Shadus
    11. Re:hair salons by Halloween+Jack · · Score: 1

      Charles Xavier--exposed!

      "I just wanted to look like Justin Timberlake", whines disabled mutant professor.

      --
      I looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked into me--and we both winked.
    12. Re:hair salons by budalite · · Score: 1

      I really hate to encourage this sort of thing, but ... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. *sob* that was beeuuutiful. "So that's what it's like to work under a deadline."

  3. Lable under terrorist by banzai51 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how much that has to do with the material possibly being labled as bomb making material. I could be way off base. Anyone in the industry want to enlighten us?

    1. Re:Lable under terrorist by BWJones · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wonder how much that has to do with the material possibly being labled as bomb making material. I could be way off base. Anyone in the industry want to enlighten us?

      This is exactly the problem. H2O2 can be violently reactive and in fact can even be hypergolic if mixed with certain compounds causing inadvertent accidents. The Nazi's found this out with their Me163's which actually had more losses due to refueling than combat losses.

      There are easier and safer ways to make bombs than with H202, but if someone wanted for instance to make a bomb using this stuff it could be done and be quite destructive.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Lable under terrorist by faeryman · · Score: 1

      I worked at a chemical plant a few years back. Products of autooxidation (peroxide) can be dangerous during evaporation/distillation. Frozen peroxide can be nasty stuff though. I am not a rocket scientist, so I do not know how the peroxide (used as fuel?) would be stored.

      As far as bombs..well, sodium peroxide can be used in a bomb, and I've seen feramongeing of a "cyanide-peroxide" bomb. Acetone peroxide can be used in bombs though, as some suicide bombers use. So yes, it would be possible. Sigh..

      --


      ,
      faeryman
    3. Re:Lable under terrorist by Eese · · Score: 1

      I guess certain materials that can possibly be used to build explosives must be made examples of. Publicize that "we need to stop using peroxide or the terrorists have already won!", and people will forget about fertilizer, gunpowder, guns, and whatever dirty nuke or brick of C4 smuggled into the country by a_terrorist_group_01.

    4. Re:Lable under terrorist by Eese · · Score: 1

      Also, we need the FBI to monitor all Internet communications so that every 11 year old who downloads a copy of "the Anarchist's Cookbook" can be apprehended and put in prison. If Kevin Mitnick can be labelled a terrorist, then so can you.

    5. Re:Lable under terrorist by halftrack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "H2O2 can be violently reactive and in fact can even be hypergolic if mixed with certain compounds causing inadvertent accidents."

      Never seen the real thing, but read up on the subject a while back. H2O2 isn't hypergolic only mixed with certain compounds, rather the other way around. You can only keep strong solutions of H2O2 (70-100%+ I guess.) IIRC you can only store it in clean environment with pure water (not tap water, pure H2O.) Any impurity in the solution or container will cause it to violently decompose, which is why Carmack wants it and maybe why he doesn't get it (seems unlikely, reading his post.)

      --
      Look a monkey!
    6. Re:Lable under terrorist by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Geeze dude, if you're making a bomb you don't go getting certified and buying H2O2, that's just assinine. Like you say there are easier ways (fuel oil & fertilizer for example, every farm in the boodies has them). If this is the reason for no H2O2 then it's bloody silly. We're talking about an X team here for goodness sakes.

    7. Re:Lable under terrorist by DasBooties · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For the Me163, the Germans used C-Stoff and T-Stoff. C-Stoff was a methyl alcohol, hydrazine hydrate and water (I don't know the exact proportions), and T-Stoff was about 80% hydrogen peroxide. Together they formed a nice little hypergolic reaction, but they did occasionally lose refueling crews. The plane's tanks had to be washed out completely before refueling and the trucks carrying C-Stoff and T-Stoff came one after the other, never at the same time (or boom).

      --

      "Flag on the Moon, how did it get there?"
    8. Re:Lable under terrorist by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      If you had followed the thread, FMC put out a requirement for them to create a safe environment. When they complied, they came up with another reason not to ship, and another, and another, and another.

      Something is rotten.

    9. Re:Lable under terrorist by victorchall · · Score: 1

      Fertilizer is also very easy to make into large bombs.

      Nitric Acid is too, although you don't go to the corner store to get barrels of it. But you don't need barrels of it, either.

      --
      -Vic If you can't figure out my email, then don't.
    10. Re:Lable under terrorist by XNormal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is exactly the problem. H2O2 can be violently reactive and in fact can even be hypergolic if mixed with certain compounds

      LOX is a powerful oxidizer, too, and reacts explosively even with a greasy fingerprint. With a 90 degrees kelvin boiling temperature it can cause severe cold burns, troublesome ice condensation and makes most materials brittle and more prone to failure.

      The Nazi's found this out with their Me163's which actually had more losses due to refueling than combat losses

      The problems early German and British rocket builders had with H2O2 are probably related to impurities that caused it to spontaneously decompose. High purity H2O2 available today, handled and stored properly in clean compatible containers and treated with respect is relatively safe.

      Chemical, semiconductors and other industries regularly handle much nastier compounds and they are regularly transported in tanker trucks that may be passing not far from your home.

      The relative safety of a compound is largely a matter of perception, not fact.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    11. Re:Lable under terrorist by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should switch over to a candle-wax-fueled rocket, which we covered here last week on SciFiToday. You can get our headlines on your Slashdot home page by clicking here and checking the SciFiToday box. Check us out!!!

  4. Peroxide? by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 1

    I've got a bottle at home he can have if he's looking to start taking donations. =)

    1. Re:Peroxide? by Mr+Teddy+Bear · · Score: 1
      ok, here is what we need to do:
      1. Raid every single grocery store for H2O2
      2. Buy a Ronco food dehydrator
      3. Pour the stuff into Ronco's magic machine
      4. Sell it to Carmack
      5. Profit!

      I think that is the first one of those that had all steps. wow. :-P
    2. Re:Peroxide? by spongman · · Score: 1
      I think you're missing something:
      ...
  5. Justified by Radio+Shack+Robot · · Score: 1

    Perhaps there are justified reasons not to let the general public have "peroxide". (H2O2?)

    --

    Beep. Boop. Beep. You have questions. I have answers and your home address.
    1. Re:Justified by Shads · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any, let anyone who wants it... have it... darwin effect prevails, soon only people who *should* have it will.

      --
      Shadus
  6. Don't Help Him, Carmack is a Menace to Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lets talk about Jon Carmack. Jon is the legendary programmer of such classic PC games as Wolfenstein, Doom, Duke nukem 3d, Quake 1, 2, and 3, unreal, and the upcoming doom3. Jon has single handedly created the genre known as the first-person-shooter. He has also popularized the Direct3d 3d format over Microsoft's competing Opengl format, as well as caused public interest in 3d cards when he first released accelerated quake for the s3 virge chipset. Jon carmack has redefined gaming on PC's.

    Now stop for a moment and think, What would have happened if Albert Einstein had worked creating amazing pinball games instead of creating the theory of relativity? Humanity would suffer! Jon carmack is unfortunately doing JUST THIS, using his gifts at computer coding to create games instead of furthering the knowledge of humanity. Carmack could have been working for NASA or the US military, but instead he simply sits around coding violent computer games.

    Is this a waste of a special and rare talent? Sadly, the answer is yes.

    Unfortunately, it doesn't stop there. Not only is Jon carmack not contributing to society, he is causing it's downfall. What was the main reason for the mass murder of dozens of people in columbine? Doom. It's always the same story: Troubled youth plays doom or quake, he arms himself to the teeth, he kills his classmates. This has happened hundreds of times in the US alone. Carmack is not only wasting his talents and intelligence; he is single-handedly causing the deaths of many young men and women. How does he sleep at night?

    Carmack is a classic example of a very talented and intelligent human being that is bent on total world destruction. Incredibly, he has made millions of dollars getting people hooked on psychotic games where they compete on the internet to see who can dismember the most people. I believe there is something morally wrong when millions of people have computerized murder fantasies, and we have Jon Carmack to thank. Carmack has used his superior intellect to create mayhem in society. Many people play games such as quake so much that their minds are permanently warped. A cousin of mine has been in therapy for 6 months after he lost a 'death match' and became catatonic.

    It is unfortunate that most people do not realize how much this man has damaged all the things we have worked hard for in America. Jon has wasted his intelligence, caused the deaths of innocent children, and warped this country forever. To top it off, he got rich in the process and is revered by millions of computer users worldwide. Perhaps one day the US government will see the light and confine Jon Carmack somewhere with no computers so he can no longer use his intelligence to wreak havoc on society.

    1. Re:Don't Help Him, Carmack is a Menace to Society by bluesoul88 · · Score: 1

      The Christians are coming to get you, and they are not pleasant people.

    2. Re:Don't Help Him, Carmack is a Menace to Society by rnash · · Score: 1
      Lets talk about Jon Carmack. Jon is the legendary programmer of such classic PC games as Wolfenstein, Doom, Duke nukem 3d, Quake 1, 2, and 3, unreal, and the upcoming doom3. [...] Now stop for a moment and think, What would have happened if Albert Einstein had worked creating amazing pinball games instead of creating the theory of relativity? Humanity would suffer! Jon carmack is unfortunately doing JUST THIS, using his gifts at computer coding to create games instead of furthering the knowledge of humanity. Carmack could have been working for NASA or the US military, but instead he simply sits around coding violent computer games. Is this a waste of a special and rare talent? Sadly, the answer is yes.

      Yes it's a waste of talent : he should be working on Doom III instead of playing with rockets !

      Or is he working on a new rocket launcher for D3 ?
  7. money by morgajel · · Score: 1

    Well, John's got money, perhaps he should talk to their board members and CEO. As much as I hate to say it, sometimes you gotta bribe to get stuff done.

    Offer to make a donation, or figure out how to become a registered peroxide buyer(?)

    Then again, there might always be other forces working against him. but I'm too tired to go into conspiracy theories:)

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
  8. It's perfectly understandable by eyegone · · Score: 5, Funny
    He's obviously part of a terrorist plot to turn us all blond!

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:It's perfectly understandable by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I thought that was the plot behind "Duran Duran" in the '80s?

      I'm Blond, Die Blond.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:It's perfectly understandable by Alsee · · Score: 1

      He's obviously part of a terrorist plot to turn us all blond!

      God no! He must be stopped! We must save the redheads!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  9. John Pick me Pick me! by t0qer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can do the job! Just watch!

    Me: Scientist bob, we need 40 barrels of the stuff by June so Carmack can launch!
    Scientist bob: Uhh sir our plants total capacity is only 1 barrell a month!
    Me: You fscking Idiot I didn't ask you what our capacity was! I gave you an order!

    See you can tell, i'm leaps and bounds better than any other slashdotter here! Pick me Pick me John! Look i'll even put caps on your name!

  10. I could be wrong..... by Cheeziologist · · Score: 1

    but peroxide only refers to a cat-ion of oxygen with an oxidation of -1 instead of the normal -2. If you just produced peroxide it would be very unstable as it would try to combine with an an-ion immediately. Is Carmack perhaps looking for a specific peroxide compound (i.e hydrogen peroxide or nitrogen peroxide) or just any compound that has oxygen with -1 oxidation numbers?

    1. Re:I could be wrong..... by Cheeziologist · · Score: 1

      when i said cat-ion i meant an-ion and when i said an-ion i meant cat-ion....sorry about that

  11. it's a bird! it's a plane! it's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    /.!
    Date: Tue Feb 4 22:02:01 2003
    List-archive: http://lists.erps.org/archives/erps-list/

    We are starting to get the distinct impression that FMC is fucking with us on the peroxide supply situation. We keep doing the things they say (spending thousands of dollars), and they keep coming up with some other reason we still can't buy peroxide (or just not return calls for weeks). They have strung us along for a long time now, and convinced us to stop talking to Degussa, but we still don't have peroxide.

    There was some talk about this a while ago, but I was a lot more hopeful about FMC, so I didn't pursue it -- maybe it is time to set up a new company on the scale of X-L Space Systems.

    I don't want to be in the chemical processing business, but I would probably be willing to be an anchor customer. I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.

    One of Michael Carden's customers has one of his concentrators, and is willing to do some peroxide production for us, but I would really prefer to work with a company, even a small one, that is devoted to peroxide, and really cares about all the details, not just someone that can feed a machine.

    Would any ERPS people be interested in actually running a business to do this? I would be happiest working with a proven production system (one of Michael's), but I could entertain notions of paying for more development work on the ERPS concentrators.

    This is sort of a trial balloon here -- if FMC turns around and ships us peroxide, that is still my preferred solution.

    John Carmack

    1. Re:it's a bird! it's a plane! it's... by foldedspace · · Score: 1
      Give me $25,000/year, a building outside of town (for safety), the equipment and I'll run it. I'm making a little less money now and I love this kind of stuff. It's even worth moving to BFE if I can get high speed internet there.

      Thank you for your consideration. ;)

  12. "Blond" Emergency by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    What? Do you want California to suddenly go brunette? Think of the repercussions!

  13. Distributed refining/processing? by Eese · · Score: 1

    1) With the tragic destruction of the Columbia the other day, I fear that NASA will be even further from the America's popular eye, and so if technological development slows down on NASA's end, the X-Prize will become even more crucial to keep flight progess moving in a forward direction.

    2) The idea of distributed computing and processing has been around for a while now, but has anyone ever thought about taking that idea and applying it to physical goods? The possibilities are endless, especially if we ever see "food replicator"-like machines, or even computer-driven tools in the home.

  14. No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Frankly it is. In fact, if you read up on what killed the Kursk, they say it was indeed an innocuous little substance that looks like water- Peroxide. The stuff reacts with practically every metal to form Oxygen (great for burning fuel). If it can form a high enough pressure to rupture sealed torpedo housings and create a fire hot enough to detonate every single torpedo on a submarine, it can do a bit of damage while being transported.

    And no, I'm not being melodramatic. To be useful it needs to be 100%... but you typically won't find it available over 35%. It's a great oxidizer- add a little to your next charcoal fire and enjoy the fumes! (ok, you'd need a catalyst like Manganese Dioxide to do it, but still...).

    Manufacture it onsite and hope you don't have an accident with your 100 gallon teflon vessels.... and please do it somewhere away from where I live.

  15. Slashdotted, here is his post by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Informative

    We are starting to get the distinct impression that FMC is fucking with us on the peroxide supply situation. We keep doing the things they say (spending thousands of dollars), and they keep coming up with some other reason we still can't buy peroxide (or just not return calls for weeks). They have strung us along for a long time now, and convinced us to stop talking to Degussa, but we still don't have peroxide.

    There was some talk about this a while ago, but I was a lot more hopeful about FMC, so I didn't pursue it -- maybe it is time to set up a new company on the scale of X-L Space Systems.

    I don't want to be in the chemical processing business, but I would probably be willing to be an anchor customer. I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.

    One of Michael Carden's customers has one of his concentrators, and is willing to do some peroxide production for us, but I would really prefer to work with a company, even a small one, that is devoted to peroxide, and really cares about all the details, not just someone that can feed a machine.

    Would any ERPS people be interested in actually running a business to do this? I would be happiest working with a proven production system (one of Michael's), but I could entertain notions of paying for more development work on the ERPS concentrators.

    This is sort of a trial balloon here -- if FMC turns around and ships us peroxide, that is still my preferred solution.

    John Carmack

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Slashdotted, here is his post by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I like the suggestion to just produce the stuff on site. You can make peroxide easily enough. The danger is storing it, and transporting it. Want a billion dollar industry, make a Peroxide factory that transports on a truck bed for on-site fuel manufacture.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Slashdotted, here is his post by insanechemist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well the stuff is not easy to make:

      Crude production. A working solution of alkylated anthraquinones which is alternately hydrogenated (using either nickel or palladium catalyst) and then air oxidized to split off H2O2. Each producer has its proprietary collection of anthrquinones, and maintaining the integrity of this working solution is key to safe and efficient H2O2 production.

      Separation. The (water insoluble) working solution is then separated from the H2O2 by solvent extraction, and then concentrated and returned to the hydrogenator. The crude H2O2 (about 40% w/w) is sent to distillation.

      Purification. Crude H2O2 is purified by distilling to about 60% w/w. This storage product may then be diluted to 35% or 50%, distilled to 70%, and/or purified for high-purity uses (e.g., food processing or semiconductor manufacture).

      Stabilization. Since H2O2 decomposition is accelerated by trace levels of contaminants (esp. transition metals) stabilizers are added prior to shipping and storage. The type and level of stabilizer depends on the product grade, but generally consists of chelants/sequestrants such as inorganic and organic phosphates, and/or stannate and silicate.

      I think Elf makes peroxides as well in the Houston area. May be able to get a French company to ship to you :) Barring that, try a distributor....

  16. Give Boeing a Call by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 1

    They're dying to invest and create industries that aren't commercial avaitation related.

    They would love to have other sources of cash to fall back on in case their commercial airplane division bottoms out again (which is about every 10-15 years).

    Dolemite

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  17. Justified use, you mean. by torpor · · Score: 1

    This isn't just some 'general public'. It's someone who has made a -very public- investment into a legitimate use of such materials, and who stands to be governed by more than sufficient safety precautions in these circumstances.

    What this is, is a market opportunity. H2O2 rocketry is *worth* the investment.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Justified use, you mean. by MuulHead · · Score: 1

      IIRC, The textile industry uses a 30% solution for bleaching cloth. Since those vendors are used to dealing with much smaller quantities, I wonder if that could be purchased and then concentrated at John Cormack's site. Alternatively, they may be able to directly supply stuff stronger than the normal concentrations.

  18. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

    I think you're being a bit overly dramatic about this.

    Yes, it's a hazardous material.

    Industry works with hazardous materials day in and day out.

    From reading the thread, one of the annoyances John is working within is that they only sell by the RAIL CAR. Sounds to me like this stuff gets used in volume, regularly, and is shipped normally.

    Also, when you say "you won't find it available over 35%" - do you mean for consumer purchase, or for industrial purchase? You can get nasty, extremely powerful chemicals at very strong concentrations - so long as you buy in industrial size bulk lots.

  19. New price for Doom 3!! by speedfreak_5 · · Score: 1

    25 bucks and a bottle of peroxide!

    --
    Why yes I am paranoid! Thanks for asking!
  20. Hydrogen Peroxide (H202) by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is the same stuff you can buy at the local drugstore in 3% dilute solution to disinfect wounds, bleach hair, etc. At very high concentration (I think for rockets they use 90+%), they can use a catalyst to initiate a very rapid exothermic decomposition of the H202 to H20 (as steam) and O2. This provides thrust, without need of a 2-part fuel/oxidizer combo.

    I know of at least 2 outfits starting out with hydrogen peroxide rockets - Armadillo Aerospace (Carmack's outfit) and the infamous Rocket Guy (the toy inventor turned spaceman.)

    Research into hydrogen peroxide rockets was done in during WWII, and actually made it into some experimental applications, I believe...

    1. Re:Hydrogen Peroxide (H202) by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Research into hydrogen peroxide rockets was done in during WWII, and actually made it into some experimental applications, I believe...

      Actually, there were production aircraft powered by hydrogen peroxide rockets. The German Me163 was a rocket-powered fighter aircraft - tiny, but capable of almost 600mph. My flying instructor, who flew in the RAF during the Second World War, said that whenever they saw Me163 fly overhead, they flew in the opposite direction so they could catch them coming back, when they were out of fuel. Otherwise, they couldn't get near them...

      There's an article in Flight Journal about them. The description of the engine is on page 3.

    2. Re:Hydrogen Peroxide (H202) by gurudyne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rudy Opitz, one of the Me 163 test pilots, is still alive and a gliding instructor in Connecticut.

      --
      Hey, Mom! Is it beer, yet?
    3. Re:Hydrogen Peroxide (H202) by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Actually, there were production aircraft powered by hydrogen peroxide rockets.

      The Royal Navy experimented with peroxide fueled submarines for a while, but gave up when they realized that all things considered, peroxide was more expensive and far more dangerous than a nuclear reactor! It's incredibly difficult to store for long periods of time, even more so if you also want to transport it, and it's vicious if it gets out of storage. Plus, in a submarine, a nuclear reactor gives you nearly unlimited ranger and electrical power (obviously not infinite but far more than you will ever need) so that's why modern navies go straight from diesel power to nukes.

    4. Re:Hydrogen Peroxide (H202) by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, as a few other posts in this article have said, H2O2-fuelled torpedos were used, but were also blamed for the Kursk explosion. Nasty stuff if it gets out.

    5. Re:Hydrogen Peroxide (H202) by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Because the peroxide will evaporate faster then the water. This leaves you with a very nice mixture of hydrogen gas and Oxygen. Which is why it's such a great propelent....however this also means you have a great chance of blowing up the rooms your working in, and they only liquid you are left with is water......

    6. Re:Hydrogen Peroxide (H202) by renecarlos · · Score: 1

      >Research into hydrogen peroxide rockets was done in during WWII, and actually made it into some experimental applications, I believe...

      IIRC peroxide torpedoes. Because the propulsion was chemical instead of mechanical, all you needed was a nice strong tank and "combustion" chamber. Since the war already stretched everyone's industrial capacity, a dumb steel shell (already in water for "afterburning") made a natural H2O2 application.

  21. They think he's a freaking terrorist by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is what happens when you sign the chit 'Abdul Al Carmack'...

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  22. So? by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
    I need some mustard...You don't see me submitting a Slashdot article about it.

    We all gots problems.

  23. Hrm. by Daleks · · Score: 1

    Carmack should just tell the companies he has one giant skinned knee. That'll get him all the peroxide he needs.

  24. Quake apologists take note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, you said, it's just a game - exposure to this sort of thing won't inspire people to build rocket launchers in real life.

    Just you wait for the railguns and plasma weapons. Then you'll be sorry.

  25. Carmack is fragbait. by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    The problem is the current NASA/government-contractor setup would just respond with "Why the fuck should we build a low-cost launch vehicle when we're getting $6B/year for Shuttle/ISS indefinitely?"

    Or to be even more cynical, it violates something I consider to be one of Life's Universal Rules, which is this: You should never threaten to cost someone more money than it would cost them to have you killed.

    For instance, suppose there's a market need for 20 commercial/military/ISS flights per year, and the government's willing to pay $500M per launch. That's $500M x 20 = $10B a year in pork to use the shuttle and our current unmanned vehicle capabilities. Against that, nobody is gonna build cheap launch capability, because it'll soon be a better business strategy to simply eliminate anyone who comes close.

    For instance, suppose Armadillo Aerospace develops tech that enables them to launch a satellite for $1M. With reduced costs, there might be a market for 100 launches a year versus 20. NASA space scientists are elated, because they can finally send an army of cheap probes to every planet, comet, and moon that tickles their fancy. And geeks (myself included!) will rejoice because we can finally read about all the cool science while we're vacationing at the Space Hilton.

    The big problem with this lovely picture is that as soon as Armadillo announces its $1M-to-orbit vehicle, $BIG_CONTRACTOR realizes that even if they buy Armadillo outright, the $10B/year gravy train (20 comm/spy satellites at $500M each) is gonna come up $9.9B short (20 comm/spysats, plus 80 space probes and Space Hilton modules, at $1M per launch). Someone will realize that you can hire a lot of assassins and saboteurs for $9.9B.

    Congressmen, upon realizing that Armadillo's success will soon mean $9.9B less pork to distribute to their districts, will conclude that a major campaign contributor has discovered an "intriguing" solution to both their respective problems.

    Both groups will publicly lament the "accident" at Armadillo that resulted in the flash-combustion of all personnel, and bemoan their sysadmins for the fact that all the offsite backup tapes containing design and technical data were unreadable, and use the "accident" to remind the voting and taxpaying public that space still isn't quite ready for private sector involvement.

    I wish Carmack and anyone else trying to provide cheap access to space the best of luck, but I fear for anyone who comes close to achieving the dream.

    1. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Paranoid rubbish.

      For starters, they'd have off-site backups.

      And the rest. Well, fuck it. Some people don't eat pork.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > Paranoid rubbish.
      >
      >For starters, they'd have off-site backups.

      Off-site backups which would conveniently be unreadable. "Whoops, the tape heads were misaligned when the tape got written. Aaw, shucks!"

      More to the point - while having an "accident" is unlikely - in that the PR costs would be enormous, and no CEO would want to sign off on it, the takeover and burial of the technology is pretty easy.

      If the success of a competitor's tech means the loss of 90% of your margins, you buy the competitor.

      If the success of a campaign contributor's competitor means the loss of 90% of the pork you can distribute to your Congressional district, and thus, the loss of jobs in your constituency, you make damn sure the FTC ignores antitrust concerns when analyzing the takeover of said competitor.

      This isn't really about Armadillo, it's about Shuttle/ISS, and why DC-X, X-33, the frickin' Shuttle "C" heavy lift vehicle, and everything else that could cut the cost to orbit, never makes it off the ground.

      I've watched it happen, over and over again, and the only conclusion I can draw is that there's too much money to be made by recipients of pork, and too many votes to be had by spreading said pork around, to ever allow the development of cheap access to space.

      Asking Congress, Boeing, and NASA in charge of putting stuff cheaply and reliably in space, is like putting Fritz Hollings, Britney Spears, and RIAA in charge of reducing the cost of CDs. Anyone who threatens the RIAA business model, gets stomped on (Napster) or sued into oblivion and bought out (mp3.com).

      (If that analogy strikes you as too karma-whorish, then fine - it's also how Valenti and Rosen would react to putting Rep. Rick Boucher, Napster and Kazaa in charge of the committee to mandate a DRM solution in every set-top box. :-)

    3. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Doesn't NASA, as a governmental organization, have the same requirement to accept the lowest bid on contracts as every other organization?

      NASA only has to accept bids from suppliers that it deems credible.

      Who, in NASA, decides which suppliers are "credible" or not?

      As much as I lambaste NASA - there's actually a good reason for this; it weeds out the crackpots. Carmack's not a crackpot, and he's a hell of a lot more likely to launch something for $1M, than I am for $500K, or JoJo's Psychic Levitation Hotline's offer for $3.99/minute/pound to orbit. But if it were just the lowest bidder, they'd have to go with the psychics.

      Unfortunately, this has a bad drawback - something has to determine whether a contractor is "for real" or not, and more often than not, what determines it is a combination of "track record" (good) and "network of political contacts" (not-so-good). At the moment, Carmack has neither, but even if he pulls off 100 perfect launches at $1M apiece, he still won't have the latter.

      Unfortunately, in some industries (and IMNSHO government-paid-for aerospace is such an industry), political connections may still be a determining factor.

      By government policy, every government launch - military as well as scientific - was supposed to have been done on the Shuttle. The fact that it cost two, three, four times as much as using expendable launch vehicles didn't change the policy. (Costs didn't matter; it just meant more pr0k for all involved!) Thay policy was only changed after the Challenger disaster gave everyone involved a reality check. National security may not be threatened if a NASA probe sits in a warehouse for 6 years waiting for a new launch window after a Shuttle delay, but sometimes a spy satellite needs to go up now.

    4. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Not really, because they're not "bidding" every individual space launch. They have the shuttle and infrastructure and their just using it. The only way for a bid to come about would be if NASA were to decide that the shuttle isn't working out and open an RFP process for a replacement (Which they've basically said they won't do for the next 20 years or so).
      >
      > Unfortunately, even in that case it's likely that they would submit specifications for what they want and people could bid on building it. So if you had a cheap idea that wasn't quite the same, they can ignore you.
      >
      > Also, most government contracts are worded in such a way that any bid considerably lower than the rest can be thrown out on the expectation that "they couldn't possibly do it for that much if no-one else can".

      Argh.

      Thanks for saying it way better than I did, just a few minutes ago.

      If NASA comes to its senses and ditches the Shuttle/ISS pork factory, I'll gladly retire my tinfoil pork-conspiracy hat forever.

      Unfortunately, everything I've heard emanating from NASA and Congress over the past couple of weeks tells me that the only thing we're likely to see come of the Columbia disaster is the apportioning of another couple of billion dollars... to build another Orbiter to replace the one that was lost.

      I want to live in a world where "NASA - Need Another Seven Astronauts" can be modded as (-1, Tasteless), not (+1, Informative).

    5. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2, Funny
      Someone will realize that you can hire a lot of assassins and saboteurs for $9.9B.

      $9.5B .. You still want to make a profit, bub.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    6. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      so whats that mean for the quake sequel?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    7. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by Will_Malverson · · Score: 1

      Remember, you can't buy out someone who isn't for sale.

      Armadillo's "How to invest in Armadillo Aerospace" page.

    8. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by greylouser · · Score: 1
      "For starters, they'd have off-site backups."

      Having an off-site backup is useless. Don't forget that in the digital world, we don't need back-ups, because a digital copy never wears out. It is timeless.

    9. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      "Paranoid rubbish. For starters, they'd have off-site backups."
      Not if Jack Valenti hears about it first...

    10. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by John+Carmack · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is an interesting annecdote related to this.

      At the world space congress last year, I was talking to Buzz Aldrin's son, who is head of acquisitions at Boeing. He really didn't believe that cheap, reusable launchers were possible (he thinks "billions of dollars in development"), but he said that if we win the X-Prize, demonstrating cheaper launch for even suborbital lobs, Boeing would "just buy us".

      From our short discussion, it was clear that we have quite different world views, so I hesitate to read much into his statements one way or the other, but it was a bit curious.

      John Carmack

    11. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by namespan · · Score: 1

      For instance, suppose there's a market need for 20 commercial/military/ISS flights per year, and the government's willing to pay $500M per launch. That's $500M x 20 = $10B a year in pork to use the shuttle and our current unmanned vehicle capabilities. Against that, nobody is gonna build cheap launch capability, because it'll soon be a better business strategy to simply eliminate anyone who comes close.

      And that, my friends, is the dark side of the invisible hand.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    12. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I want to live in a world where "NASA - Need Another Seven Astronauts" can be modded as (-1, Tasteless), not (+1, Informative).

      What does it say about a guy when I read that sentence and remember the Challenger? Hmm......hopefully nothing about age....

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    13. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      The big problem with this lovely picture is that as soon as Armadillo announces its $1M-to-orbit vehicle, $BIG_CONTRACTOR realizes that even if they buy Armadillo outright, the $10B/year gravy train (20 comm/spy satellites at $500M each) is gonna come up $9.9B short (20 comm/spysats, plus 80 space probes and Space Hilton modules, at $1M per launch).

      The problem there is that Carmack isn't in it for the money (at this stage at least) - he just likes rockets. The second problem is that once he proves it can be done, there's little to stop anyone recreating it. The third problem is that Carmack could run id software and launch rockets just as well from Switzerland - one of the least likely places to get assassinated by a foreign government.

      Think about it... don't you suppose that the steam engine industry would have loved to have suppressed the diesel engine? But they couldn't.

    14. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by andyt · · Score: 1

      Remember, you can't buy out someone who isn't for sale.

      But you can buy a guy to stop selling essential equipment to someone-who-isn't-for-sale; or buy a guy to make what the person-who-isn't-for-sale is doing illegal; or buy a guy to "persuade" the person-who-isn't-for-sale to stop doing whatever it is that they are doing....

      just sayin'.

    15. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Thats really ludicrous. That the son of an astronaut could grow up to be a bureaucrat ...

      Still, we don't need to fear you getting bumped off any time soon do we John? You've got ample CIA-safe security, right? Oh, and off-site backups too, no?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    16. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by WNight · · Score: 1

      If Carmack comes up with a rocket that'll do $1M to space, with a decent payload (satellite + launch equip) he'll get business. If the US government cracked down on him for imagined safety reasons (he can launch from the center of the desert, with unmanned payloads, as long as the rockets have a destruct switch, they're pretty safe) he could pick up and go to Brazil, or some other country that would *love* a supply a hard currency.

      The conspiracy theory only works if they control the industry completely enough to cut him off 100%. That's the stuff of story books.

      What would happen, I'm sure, is that the companies involved would bring a long, drawn out suit against him, trying to invalidate his patents (if any) or show how this was covered by their patents. Then they'd crank the price up to $10M per launch by "adding safety precautions" or something, pocket the $9M, and perform $1M launches. It's pretty well what happens in the software industry. If you can't buy them out, you sue them under, and offer a lower quality version of their service for more money.

    17. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > What does it say about a guy when I read that sentence and remember the Challenger? Hmm......hopefully nothing about age....

      Amen, bro.

      In 1986, it was -1, Tasteless. In 2003, it's +1, Informative. When we lose another Orbiter in a few years, it'll be +1, "NASA's Bold Vision of the Future - Rebuilding the Shuttle Fleet"

      No disrespect intended to the crew of either vehicle, nor to the engineers who keep 'em flying against all odds and against an army of NASA bureaucrats, but it's time for the Shuttle to go.

    18. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by T.E.D. · · Score: 1
      but he said that if we win the X-Prize, demonstrating cheaper launch for even suborbital lobs, Boeing would "just buy us".


      Unless you are a publicly-traded company, I don't see how Boeing could do that without your cooperation. (That's one reason of many why I don't think I'd ever do an IPO for a company of mine). I suppose dirty tricks that make your position untenable are possible, and a "head of acquisitions" should know more about what's possible than me.

      However, I used to work at a big gummit contractor myself (who shall go nameless, but whose initials are LMCO). Its pretty common for them to hire ex-military or ex-NASA guys just for the PR value, and put them in positions where they deal with other companies, particularly former friends and collegues, or anyone who's liable to be awed by who they are. Generally the person's skill for the job is not an issue, so often they are the most inept employees in the org. So it could Easily (with a capital 'E') be that the guy's a bumbling idiot.

      However, this is clearly a huge generalization. For all I know Buzz Jr. could be a diabolicly clever takeover genius. (trying hard not to laugh here...)

      If I were you I'd trust my impression of him when we met in person. If he seemed really knowledgable and sharp, perhaps you should worry. If he seems about as clued-in as a bunny on a dingo ranch, he probably is.
    19. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by ballwall · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about Armadillo, but if it's anything like id it's privately held, right? Probably with you being the majority holder. Would you even consider selling out if this situation were to happen, knowing that the buyer would probably bury the technology?

    20. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by demigod · · Score: 1
      You should never threaten to cost someone more money than it would cost them to have you killed.

      Henceforth to be know as Tackhead's Law.

      --
      "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
      Major Major
    21. Re:Carmack is fragbait. by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you mean by "killed". American companies are very averse to killing white people within the developed world. Just not done, you see.
      On the other hand, if you define "killed" as trashing their credit, causing their suppliers to walk away, stealing their staff, that kind of thing, well . . .
      Back in the eighties I went to a conference in DC about invention development and ended up sitting in on an explanation by a corporate lawyer about patent selling policy. His basic statement was that inventors should always be sure that what they were planning to charge a large company was less then the cost of both a.) the company duplicating the process and b.) the cost of the company bankrupting the inventor and buying out their assets. He then proceeded to go over some cases where companies had done just that. Looks to me like Carmack may be experiencing the first moves of just such a plan.
      Morton-Thiokol, et al don't need to do anything as primitive and proveable as violence. Microsoft-style tactics work just fine.

      Oh, and let's not forget that your paranoid plan wouldn't work for the simple reason that Armadillo posts (and has since day one) detailed logs of their techniques and setbacks on their website. I've downloaded a few entries myself. Ain't no way anybody can effectively destroy AA's intellectual property short of the sort of police state takeover we're all fighting as it is. The data is spread all over the world and not even the people at Armadillo know who has it.
      Rustin

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  26. Best response to a Slashdotting by multimed · · Score: 4, Funny
    (not counting handling the excessive load w/o getting Slashdotted of course)

    Too many users... blah blah blah
    Probable cause: http://www.slashdot.org

    Try again in a few seconds...

    -xian@idsoftware.com

    Good Guess.
    --
    Vote Quimby.
  27. Hmmmm.... by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1
    Why, oh, why, do I picture this guy standing on the roof of his house, preparing to rocket-jump in real life...

    I'd hate to be whoever has to clean up the gibs... :P

  28. Uh oh by Siriaan · · Score: 1

    "Blondes...... In...... Spaaaaaaaaaace!"

  29. Re:Bill McNeal Has Got Your Rocket Fuel! by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

    That's ills and idiotic man... ;)

  30. I don't understand... by AltImage · · Score: 1

    Is he trying to launch a rocket or or blonde? Does he think he has to look like Lance Bass to get into space?

  31. Peroxide by jda487 · · Score: 1

    I would assume it is hydrogen peroxide(H2O2) because rocket fuel is made up of liquid hydrogen (H) and liquid oxygen (O). Burning them together is gread, and can produce water.

    1. Re:Peroxide by jda487 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Holy shit. I didn't see all these other posts with way better answers. My bad, sorry.

  32. The plan by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Build peroxide factory ('cuz Slashdot said so)
    2. Sell it to Carmack
    3. Watch in horror as he gets bored of the whole thing and returns to writing games
    4. ???
    5. Flood the Internet with evil pop-unders advertising HERBAL PEROXIDE FOR BLONDES
    6. Profit!!!
  33. Here's an idea by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

    Someone put Carmack in touch with Ryan Seacrest, host of American Idol. He seems to have plenty of peroxide to donate.

  34. I know where he can get it by TheJesusCandle · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm guessing getting all the hair salons to chip in a gallon or two won't help here will it. Worth a shot I guess. (:

    1. Re:I know where he can get it by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Informative

      We're not talking the 3% solution you buy at Walgreen's here, he needs 100% or nearly 100% peroxide.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    2. Re:I know where he can get it by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, no. :) I believe hydrogen peroxide as a fuel needs to be 70% or better.

    3. Re:I know where he can get it by trmj · · Score: 1

      I think my mom single handedly paid for all of walgreen's expenses with her peroxide buying.

      It hurt. A lot.

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    4. Re:I know where he can get it by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      So I guess it wouldn't do your hair much good. Or is that what Hollyweird means by a "blond bombshell"? :^P

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:I know where he can get it by alexburke · · Score: 1

      If it hurt, it wasn't peroxide. Peroxide only bubbles on contact with a wound, but doesn't hurt.

    6. Re:I know where he can get it by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 3, Funny

      Peroxide only bubbles on contact with a wound, but doesn't hurt.

      It tickles! Sometimes I want to wound myself just so I can put peroxide on it, I love it!

      Other times, I'm more sane.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:I know where he can get it by gunpowder · · Score: 1

      Hehe, perhaps the 3% you usually use. If I go to the pharmacy and buy 30% H2O2 (70% water) I'm a little bit more careful, because it HURTS when my skin comes in contact with it. Not only that, it gets totally white, like snow, and the skin feels somewhat strange (rough). And I'm not talking about wound here, but healthy skin! Moreover it's a really good bleach, very good for desinfection and also a good catalyt for some chemical reactions (that's why I buy it).

    8. Re:I know where he can get it by Shads · · Score: 1

      2%-5% solutions are nothing major just a good cleaner for wounds... a pure solution of h2o2 would take your skin off entirely.

      --
      Shadus
    9. Re:I know where he can get it by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, it gets totally white, like snow, and the skin feels somewhat strange (rough). And I'm not talking about wound here, but healthy skin!

      Um....you do realize that you are KILLING the cells. This is cleaning out the wound to prevent infection but it's also making it worse and oreventing good healing. There's a reason most people buy the 3%. The 30% stuff if usually for when people have large areas (like burns) and they mix that with water to make a LOT of mixture for soaking in. Using that stuff straight up is NOT a good idea.

  35. Only problem by unterderbrucke · · Score: 1

    If NASA can't launch a shuttle safely, why should we as citizens be attempting it?

    1. Re:Only problem by drfreak · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      If Microsoft can't launch a secure product, why are we as open source users/developers/advocates attempting it?

    2. Re:Only problem by dslpwr · · Score: 1

      Huh?! Last I checked, NASA had been launching and landing shuttles for about 20 years, and only lost two of them. To me, for such a dangerous - yet absolutely worthwhile - endeavor, that is a pretty damned good track record.

      --
      www.robot-invasion.com smart-assed political news, humor, and commentary
    3. Re:Only problem by bsartist · · Score: 1

      Private citizens should be attempting it because NASA can't launch a shuttle safely.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    4. Re:Only problem by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      >>To me, for such a dangerous - yet absolutely worthwhile - endeavor, that is a pretty damned good track record.

      You just Jinxed the Space Shuttle Endeavor so bad! Hope your happy.

    5. Re:Only problem by peatbakke · · Score: 1

      If NASA can't launch a shuttle safely, why should we as citizens be attempting it?

      (rewind 30 years)

      If IBM can't build a cheap but effective computer, why should small companies be attempting it?

      (return to present day)

      Because competition is good. Competition makes things better.

      Space flight is a well developed science now, which means it can be duplicated and made cheaper.

      Because there's always room for improvement.

      Because one size does not fit all.

      There's thousands of reasons why this is a good idea.

      Don't defer to the established experts, just because they're established.

  36. litigation by magarity · · Score: 1

    I bet a big part is litigation. If this craft blows up (this happens on occasion with spacecraft), relatives are too likely to sue any and all suppliers of equipment and materials that went into it. (I'd check the article to see if this is mentioned, but the thing is already /.ed)

  37. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by Xacid · · Score: 1

    "The stuff reacts with practically every metal to form Oxygen (great for burning fuel)." So would that mean that you'd have to have this stuff only come into contact with say...plastic tubing instead of metal pipe? How durable would something like this be?

  38. Blonde? by Ribo99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't John already a blonde?

    --
    I wear pants.
    1. Re:Blonde? by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      Not unless he's had a sex change operation. Men are blond. Women are blonde.

    2. Re:Blonde? by Your+Login+Here · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you're french. In english there are simply two alternate spellings since we don't use masculine and feminine rules.

  39. The Danger? by StarTux · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a bunch of journalists needing and wanting fame and fortune trump up a bunch of charges against such an adventure? Whats the safety aspects involved in peroxide manufacture?

    StarTux

    1. Re:The Danger? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
      Whats the safety aspects involved in peroxide manufacture?

      You mean besides (seemingly) spontaneous explosions, and disolved bodies if something goes terribly wrong?

      Not much, I'd expect. :-(

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  40. Plant closing... by Coz · · Score: 2

    Funny - my buddy's dad is being forced to retire from a 30-year career because the peroxide plant he works for in West Virginia is closing. They claimed "oversupply", obsolete equipment and processes, and bad market conditions.

    Hunh.

    --
    I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    1. Re:Plant closing... by Coz · · Score: 1

      Not my dad - and no, not necessarily. It's industrial-strength stuff - I understand they can crank it out anywhere from 90% to 35% strength, depending on the customer. They're a bit ticked off - in the retiring guy's opinion, they're one of the few plants that can change the concentration of the stuff they make without major retooling (of course, I could have heard that wrong).

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    2. Re:Plant closing... by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2
      I understand they can crank it out anywhere from 90% to 35% strength, depending on the customer.

      You might want to post some contact information here -- and send it directly to Carmack. This sounds like exactly what he's looking for, and it might end up saving a few jobs in the mix.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    3. Re:Plant closing... by Coz · · Score: 1

      A little Googling, (the buddy and his dad weren't quickly available yesterday) and I found that the plant is question is owned by... FMC! So the bad news is, the company that's messing with Carmack is the one that shut down the plant... the good news is, the Bayport, TX plant (down JC's way) is the one that's supposed to make up for the reduction in capacity.

      Strange but true....

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
  41. How much? by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    How much peroxide would $100k get you? That's a lot of money, and I'd expect a smaller company that just starts so as to make and sell peroxide would be able to either produce a lot more or a lot less peroxide for the same dollar.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    1. Re:How much? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I'd expect a smaller company that just starts so as to make and sell peroxide would be able to either produce a lot more or a lot less peroxide for the same dollar.

      I would expect a plant to make 100% H2O2 safely in reasonable quantities would cost between $5 and $10 million to build.

      FMC et all make peroxide in world-scale manufacturing facilites for both use internally as an intermediate for other chemicals they sell, and on the merchant market. A world scale peroxide plant is probably $100 million plus to build. Most of FMC's customers are probably buying $1 million+ per year. $100,000 is peanuts to these guys.

    2. Re:How much? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How much peroxide would $100k get you? That's a lot of money,

      Not really. It's enough to keep a small handfull of grease-monkeys employed full-time for a year -- not including equipment and supplies. It's probably enough to pay for a part-time production facility -- but that's what Carmack sounds like he wants to avoid.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  42. Stop thinking peroxide, think candle wax by DuBois · · Score: 1

    Carmack needs to look into the latest technology for rockets, candle wax: purified (oilless) paraffin, with some additives. He could then get either gaseous or liquid oxygen from just about any welding supply house.

    --
    The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
    1. Re:Stop thinking peroxide, think candle wax by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Or just good old fashioned kerosene.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Stop thinking peroxide, think candle wax by Ashran · · Score: 1

      >The German owns the fish. Hey, he drinks coffee too.
      And smokes Rothmann's!

      --

      Before you email me, remember: "There is no god!"
  43. perhaps he should change his technique? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hi My name is John Carmack and I'd.....yes the same guy that worked on doom and quake.......yeah I'd like to order several thousand gallons of....yes those games are violent, lots of blowing stuff up.....anyhow I'd like to order several thousand gallons of highly explosive and caustic peroxide in order to...Hello? Hello? damn."

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:perhaps he should change his technique? by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

      Ah. So that's what was in all those barrels in Doom.

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  44. Dude. by Tom7 · · Score: 1


    Dude, hydrogen peroxide is like 79 cents at the drug store on my street.

    1. Re:Dude. by foolish · · Score: 1

      which is approx. 3% H202 by volume, full of chemical stabilizers that negate the utility of it for passing through catalyst packs.

      oh wait. you were trolling. ne'ermind then.

  45. Re:+18 Informative by PD · · Score: 1

    The best stuff they make is their "Technical Grade" which is only 50%. Not good enough.

  46. Re:Probe into Rocket Science by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    "If we examine the realities of rocket science, we come across a rather unusual and interesting fact. While some might disagree with me, the shape of a rocket was specifically designed to resemble the human male sexual organ - the penis. Morover, it, no doubt, has a homosexual tilt to it. Therefore we might conclude that rocket science, like linux, *bsd and other silly silly things, is gay."

    Unbeknownst to many people, including YOUR ignorant ass, is that the first missiles and rockets WERE shaped like the female human vagina. After many aerodynamic tests, the shape was molded back to the shape we have today, which is actually the remaining clitoris.

    Therefore, if you have a problem with the shape of rockets, YOU, my friend, have unconscious issues with females, and ergo, you are the homosexual.

  47. Labeled a terrorist by the BATF, FBI by codepunk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The problem with anything like this is that you will immediately have the damn BATF, FBI goons breathing down your neck. 90% pure hydrogen peroxide is a oxidizer, it could be used for bad things (bombs) or hybrid rocket research by private citizens. The problem is that the gubment will target you as a hostile terrorist first. I wanted to do private rocket research on using thermite as a hybrid rocket propellant. This would require the purchase of aluminum powder, guaranteed visit by the BATF. I found that it just was not worth the possible hassle.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Labeled a terrorist by the BATF, FBI by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
      This would require the purchase of aluminum powder, guaranteed visit by the BATF. I found that it just was not worth the possible hassle.
      Where's the jurisdiction? Aluminum powder isn't alcohol, tobacco or firearms.

      I think that BATF includes Explosives (despite the name). In any case: Put a big-sized steelie in the nozzle of a firing rocket, and you've got a makeshift cannon. I think that classifies as a firearm.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  48. Uh huh by katre · · Score: 1

    Carmack, noted chemist that he is, just wants to start up a company to make peroxide. Where's he going to put the factory? Most towns don't want it, and even then it'll take a while to build. How's he going to get the permits? The EPA, not to mention whatever local authorities exist, won't be too happy about you just setting up a heavy chemical shop. Setting up a major chemical supply business is a major undertaking. This isn't the sort of thing richboys can do on a whim. Even his offer to do a guaranteed $100,000 a year isn't going to cover the startup costs. Sorry, guy, try again.

  49. Peroxide by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    Hydrogen peroxide is available from any common drug store. Why would the suppliers have a problem selling it to these guys?

    Even if they cant get it directly from the suppliers, surely it's available in bulk through retail channels?

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  50. Interesting by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not a rocket scientist

    Hey, but we ARE talking rocket science here ;-)

    Acutally one of the real issues here is that rocket fuel needs to be low explosive (i.e. an oxidizer and a fuel, rather than a high explosive where these are integrated into the same molecule). So there is not a whole lot of difference between what you might buy if you wanted to make a rocket and if you wanted to make a very large, low explosive bomb (think fertilizer/oil, gunpowder, etc).

    My suggestion is go liquid fuel-- you can get liquid oxygen without too much hassle (needed for everything from medical to welding) and the fuel could consist of anything from kerosene to acetylene.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Interesting by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, a high explosive is simply an explosive that expands faster than the speed of sound (a shock wave), while a low explosive remains subsonic. From a practical standpoint, this means that a low explosive will just burn fast unless it is confined. A high explosive is effectively 'confined' by the surrounding air.

      I imagine they are going with H2O2 rather than LOX so they don't have to insulate the tank, deal with extremely low temperatures (and ice) as it boils, and of course, deal with venting the tank while filling/counting down, etc.

    2. Re:Interesting by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Interesting
      But don't try launching your rocket in sub-zero temps, 'cause h2o2 freezes at -1 degree. Also don't leave it in the earth's shadow for too long - same reason. It's really a shitty propellant for a clipper-style mission.

      Check this link: for mor e info on using h2o2 as a propellant.

    3. Re:Interesting by sjames · · Score: 1

      The freezing point is definatly a minus. It's not so bad for launch (The shuttle isn't allowed to launch in cold weather either, due to the O rings). A different fuel might be advisable for anything after the boost phase. Hydrazine is a popular choice there. A negative there is that it is quite toxic.

    4. Re:Interesting by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 1

      A high explosive is one where the decomposition travels through the explosive faster than sound ensuring (practicaly) all the explosive is reacted before it blows itself apart. Charcoal soaked in LOX is a decent high explosive.

      Liquid oxegen is not normaly used in welding or medicine unless you want to freeze your patients. Oxegen will not become liquid at room temperature no matter how much you compress it. It has to be kept rather cold and will give you all sorts of handling problems. You end up putting foam insulation on your fuel tanks to keep them cold and you know what that leads to.

      I used to work in a large chemical plant (16 square miles of germany) and I got the internal bus (internal to the plant, not to me) every morning opposite the liquid air plant, all chaps dressed in silver suits and spooky mist effects when they filled the lorries.

      --
      Maybe you live in interesting times
    5. Re:Interesting by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      It's kind of hard to leave your rocket in earth's shadow for a long time when it's zipping around in orbit at 17,000 mph.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    6. Re:Interesting by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      The last flight did launch in freezing conditions, and it's now suspected that the foam insulation was "contaminated" with ice, making it much harder, and thusly more likely to cause damage to the tiles.

    7. Re:Interesting by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      at LEO we're talking about ~90 minutes per orbit, which means 45 minutes in shadow, and, "baby, it gets cold outside!". If I take a bottle of pop out of the fridge and stick it outside on a day like today, it'll freeze solid in less time than that. So a launch with ambient temperatures even a few degrees above freezing could be a problem. Certainly something to keep in mind until it's proven safe.

    8. Re:Interesting by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Here's a couple of actual facts:

      Time in the shadow in LEO is considerably less than 45 minutes, because the earth is smaller than the orbit, and because the orbit is not perfectly equatorial.

      According to http://www.tak2000.com/data/planets/earth.htm, the lowest, most equatorial LEO will spend 41% of its time in shadow. Practically, nobody ever goes into equatorial LEO, because it's extremely fuel-expensive to do so from a non-equatorial launch site (which all of them are).

      For your second point; the reason your bottle of pop freezes outside is because there's a huge amount of very cold air around. When you're in orbit, there is no air. The fact that there's no sunlight makes no difference; you will cool off at an extremely slow rate. The big problem in engineering a near-earth spacecraft getting rid of all the heat, which is why the shuttle always orbits with its doors open, to provide a larger radiating surface. Of the three ways to move heat (convection, conduction, radiation), radiation is by *far* the slowest, and it's the only means available in this situation.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    9. Re:Interesting by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      Read ERPS's site to see why they, and Carmack, aren't doing LOX and have no intention of doing so.

  51. Why doesn't he just buy it on eBay? by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Or, he could lobby Saddam to give him some. Instead of producing nerve gas, they can make peroxide!
    You do realize I'm kidding right? Right moderators? Have mercy...

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  52. Just went to Taco Bell... by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    If they'd just use Methane, I'd be set... ;)

    Seriously, though, have they tried the hair salons? Seems to be plethora of blondes that I distinctly recall being brunettes last year running around...

    Yeah yeah.

    Har har. :)

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  53. Why not just ask Pamela Anderson by kfg · · Score: 1

    I'm sure she's got enough lying around to handle any independant's needs.

    In fact, her consumption may be the reason supplier's are loath to part with what they've got. You wouldn't want to stiff your best customer just becasue someone wanted to waste this stuff as rocket fuel, now would you?

    KFG

    1. Re:Why not just ask Pamela Anderson by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 1

      you just mentioned stiffing Pamela Anderson. absolutely brilliant. =)

  54. Had to be said by stripmarkup · · Score: 1

    I just have one word for you: peroxides

    --
    See charts for twitter trends on Trendistic
  55. Peroxide fueled the X-15 by Grendol · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hydrogen Peroxide at a ~90%95% concentration was the key component for the X-15 rocket plane that was used to develop a large portion of the hypersonic flight and planetary reentry data for the first steps of the space program. The X-15 achieved mach 6.7 and 354.200ft altitude. With The theoretical 'edge of space' set at 62 miles (327360 ft), Peroxide should work. (Quite a bit about the X-15 can be read at this NASA SITE http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Newsroom/FactSheets/FS-05 2-DFRC.html ) Other versions of the x-15 used Oxygen and ammonia. Maybe they could be fuel alternatives.

  56. Apropos rocket.. by soccerisgod · · Score: 1
    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  57. I can Tell Slashdot about my problems too by interiot · · Score: 1

    I wish I made Slashdot every time I had an engineering problem. Now granted I'm not plunking down $100k every day on raw ingredients, but still... If you were Carmack, wouldn't it be a little expected and wouldn't you think it's a little over-the-top that random posts about very very specific things make slashdot (eg. concentrator machines).

    1. Re:I can Tell Slashdot about my problems too by interiot · · Score: 1
      I was actually suggesting that he's probably quite surprised and confused as to why a somewhat insignificant post of his (in the scheme of things... not that creating your own company and promising $100k of sales up front isn't completely insignificant. but not necessarily on the level of Eldred decisions either) made the front page of slashdot.

      And, uh... perhaps suggest something about those who would be willing to spend lots of time posting and reading about such a thing, but I won't go there. When in Rome, don't deficate on the Romans.

  58. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by MajikGuru · · Score: 1

    From what I understand about hydrogen peroxide, (my chemistry is rusty) it's not possible to have a 100% solution of it; the oxygen radical is too reactive. But it's still some really strong shit, in any case.

  59. Why can't we get a microorgranism to synthesize it by acidfast7 · · Score: 1
    We can get "pond scum" to produce hydrogen in the absence of oxygen and sulfur.

    See "pond scum" here.

    Why can't we get a microbe to produce H2O2 as a metabolic byproduct. I have always felt that biological metabolism and bioremediation are two of the largest untapped resources on planet.

  60. Make sure it's unionized. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

    If you're starting a peroxide business, make sure it's unionized from the beginning. We don't want that bubbly, fizzy mess that comes when peroxide touches scabs.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:Make sure it's unionized. by PlaysByEar · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who read that as "un-ionized"?

    2. Re:Make sure it's unionized. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      Now my performance in chemistry class may not have been explosive, but I find your statement a bit reactionary, if intellectually inert.

      An inadvertent double entendre?
      You, sir, are an oxy-moron.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  61. Dumbing down by Herby+Werby · · Score: 2, Funny

    We know why he really wants all this peroxide: he's tired of his rep as a programming genius and has decided to spend the rest of his life as a dumb blonde.

  62. Legal Liability by Detritus · · Score: 1

    The suppliers may not want the possible legal liability of selling such a dangerous material to non-industrial customers. Many chemical supply companies refuse to sell anything to private citizens for this reason.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  63. Borrow a cup of sugar? by glyons · · Score: 1

    As I recall, Rocket Guy is planing to make his own. Maybe he could tighten John up a bit.

  64. Translation by pjdoland · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Anyone want to start a peroxide business?"

    Might as well be translated as:

    "Does anyone want to start a business that will have its customer database searched routinely under the Patriot Act?"

    --
    -- "The reward of suffering is experience." - Aeschylus
  65. Wow... by Uncle+Flip · · Score: 1

    Slashdot posts are in reruns again... when does the new season start? :)

    -UF

  66. Real Issue? by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Carmack has a bigger problem: Pimples.

    I'll be at radio76.com if you need me.

  67. Strange by captain_craptacular · · Score: 1

    I wasn't aware that peroxide was a controlled substance...

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
  68. well, has Carmack actually flown yet? by tycheung · · Score: 1

    Out of curiousity, has Carmack created a working rocket or achieved flight at least? Because some companies are already off the terra firma... http://xcor.com/

  69. Distilling h2o2 by Boatman · · Score: 1

    I used to read the ERPS-list in the mid-90's - they had resorted to distilling their own h2o2 (taking commercial h2o2 93% up to >97% purity, as I recall), after dealing with several problems in which additives made it hard to distill.

    They ran the still in a trailer on the rocket ranch, and a pressure release valve failed. The resulting explosion left a sizeable hole in the trailer, and drew some attention from inquisitive government officials.

    So, John, the moral of the story is to make sure your still is in proper operating condition before using it in your home. :)

    --
    --Just the place for a snark!
  70. Duhh... by gUmbi · · Score: 1

    Well duh..has anybody called any hair salons??? (yes, I am joking ;)

  71. Rocket Guy is Producing Peroxide by sailracer6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe the Rocket Guy (http://www.rocketguy.com) is producing his own peroxide for his rocket. Might he be willing to double the output for some cash?

  72. Peroxide in Cars by Amon+Re · · Score: 1

    A little off topic, but peroxide seems like it is a clean fuel, whats stopping car makers from using this instead of gasoline to power cars?

    1. Re:Peroxide in Cars by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Just drop an iron filing into a tank of 100% H2O2, and you will see why.

    2. Re:Peroxide in Cars by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      It's not a fuel. It's an oxidising agent. You would still need some kind of inflammable stuff to burn in the cylinders. Using Hydrogen Peroxide would be like a really hardcore version of using Nitrous Oxide, and would probably melt your exhaust valves.

  73. Why wont they sell peroxide? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Excuse the confusion, is peroxide a restricted material in USA now, much as some types of knowledge is already?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  74. Hydrogen Peroxide and Methanol, as I recall. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Lab grade qualities of each. Had a nasty tendency to dissolve the pilot if the fuel bladder ruptured.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  75. Post Contents by tvsjr · · Score: 1
    Since their server already seems to be lagging, here's the post:

    We are starting to get the distinct impression that FMC is fucking with us on the peroxide supply situation. We keep doing the things they say (spending thousands of dollars), and they keep coming up with some other reason we still can't buy peroxide (or just not return calls for weeks). They have strung us along for a long time now, and convinced us to stop talking to Degussa, but we still don't have peroxide.

    There was some talk about this a while ago, but I was a lot more hopeful about FMC, so I didn't pursue it -- maybe it is time to set up a new company on the scale of X-L Space Systems.

    I don't want to be in the chemical processing business, but I would probably be willing to be an anchor customer. I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.

    One of Michael Carden's customers has one of his concentrators, and is willing to do some peroxide production for us, but I would really prefer to work with a company, even a small one, that is devoted to peroxide, and really cares about all the details, not just someone that can feed a machine.

    Would any ERPS people be interested in actually running a business to do this? I would be happiest working with a proven production system (one of Michael's), but I could entertain notions of paying for more development work on the ERPS concentrators.

    This is sort of a trial balloon here -- if FMC turns around and ships us peroxide, that is still my preferred solution.

    John Carmack
  76. The Reason is Simple by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    Because the suppliers won't just sell peroxide to well financed, registered, X-prize teams, who may be a cover for a terrorist organization.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  77. Peroxide by theGreater · · Score: 1

    Hell, he can have all my mouthwash, if he wants. I'll check at Wally World to see how much, but IIRC it's only 40 cents a bottle. Pssh. n00b.

    -theGreater moron.

  78. Sure.... by doi · · Score: 1

    I mean hell, I haven't almost been killed by my faulty stove in over a week, let me start brewing up highly reactive rocket fuel in my sink now.

    --
    A man's reach must exceed his grasp, or what's an erection for?
  79. In Ze New World Order by Mittermeyer · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the New World Order ordinary citizens will not be allowed to have the capability to build rockets unless they are part of the state-approved aeronautics industry. The Homeland Security issues alone will cause most personal heavy rocket experimentation to cease.

    There are the liability issues as well if any chemical company ever sells stocks innocently to any terrorists. In a risk-adverse environment, most companies will not take that risk.

    Besides, you've seen those Carmack games. They are violent! He creates violence in our children! We must protect our children!!!

    --
    ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
    1. Re:In Ze New World Order by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 1
      I concur.

      Leaving John Carmack in possession of weapons of mass destruction for a few more months or years is not an option, not in a post-Sept. 11 world.

      What? A BFG is not a real weapon of mass destruction?

  80. More! more! more! by wantedman · · Score: 1

    First he gets all fussy over Slashdot's reporting of the leak of beta of Doom III, then he wants us to give him rocket fuel???

    Oh wait...

  81. Server slashdotted... by Hobart · · Score: 1

    [ERPS] Peroxide production

    * To: erps-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    * Subject: [ERPS] Peroxide production
    * From: John Carmack <johnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    * Date: Tue Feb 4 22:02:01 2003
    * Delivered-to: erps-list@lists.erps.org
    * List-archive: <http://lists.erps.org/archives/erps-list/>
    * List-help: <mailto:erps-list-request@lists.erps.org?subject=h elp>
    * List-id: ERPS discussion list <erps-list.lists.erps.org>
    * List-post: <mailto:erps-list@lists.erps.org>
    * List-subscribe: <http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list> ,<mailto:erps-list-request@lists.erps.org?subject= subscribe>
    * List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list> ,<mailto:erps-list-request@lists.erps.org?subject= unsubscribe>
    * Sender: erps-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    We are starting to get the distinct impression that FMC is fucking with us on the peroxide supply situation. We keep doing the things they say (spending thousands of dollars), and they keep coming up with some other reason we still can't buy peroxide (or just not return calls for weeks). They have strung us along for a long time now, and convinced us to stop talking to Degussa, but we still don't have peroxide.

    There was some talk about this a while ago, but I was a lot more hopeful about FMC, so I didn't pursue it -- maybe it is time to set up a new company on the scale of X-L Space Systems.

    I don't want to be in the chemical processing business, but I would probably be willing to be an anchor customer. I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.

    One of Michael Carden's customers has one of his concentrators, and is willing to do some peroxide production for us, but I would really prefer to work with a company, even a small one, that is devoted to peroxide, and really cares about all the details, not just someone that can feed a machine.

    Would any ERPS people be interested in actually running a business to do this? I would be happiest working with a proven production system (one of Michael's), but I could entertain notions of paying for more development work on the ERPS concentrators.

    This is sort of a trial balloon here -- if FMC turns around and ships us peroxide, that is still my preferred solution.

    John Carmack

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  82. Contents of the article by Jeremiah+Blatz · · Score: 1

    Site was mostly hosed when I tried to visit. Telnet got this for me:
    -
    We are starting to get the distinct impression that FMC is fucking with us on the peroxide supply situation. We keep doing the things they say (spending thousands of dollars), and they keep coming up with some other reason we still can't buy peroxide (or just not return calls for weeks). They have strung us along for a long time now, and convinced us to stop talking to Degussa, but we still don't have peroxide.

    There was some talk about this a while ago, but I was a lot more hopeful about FMC, so I didn't pursue it -- maybe it is time to set up a new company on the scale of X-L Space Systems.

    I don't want to be in the chemical processing business, but I would probably be willing to be an anchor customer. I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.

    One of Michael Carden's customers has one of his concentrators, and is willing to do some peroxide production for us, but I would really prefer to work with a company, even a small one, that is devoted to peroxide, and really cares about all the details, not just someone that can feed a machine.

    Would any ERPS people be inter ested in actually running a business to do this? I would be happiest working with a proven production system (one of Michael's), but I could entertain notions of paying for more development work on the ERPS concentrators.

    This is sort of a trial balloon here -- if FMC turns around and ships us peroxide, that is still my preferred solution.

    John Carmack

  83. Right under his nose... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    Gee whiz John, you've designed thousands of rocket launchers in Quake and Doom, why not use the power of these devices to get you into space.

    Duh! :)

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  84. if you by geekoid · · Score: 1

    started a peroxide company, do you really think you would be able to ignore the regulations these companies work under?

    I doubt they don't want to sell. It's probably they need to abide by some regulation that is preventing them from selling.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  85. Either.... by Skyshadow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I am traveling backwards and forwards in time, or Slashdot is messed up. If it's that first one, I wish I'd paid more attention in history class, or at least could remember my phone # back in Wisconsin so I could call myself to unload that RedHat stock back when it was above $100....

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Either.... by Coz · · Score: 1

      While I can't testify to your time-stuckedness (please repost if you run into Montana Wildhack), I can testify to Slashdot being verra, verra strange on the filtering tonight. This topic keeps going from 3 entries to over a hundred, and I'm not messing with my filters.

      I'm sure it'll all be over soon. Move right along, nothing to see here....

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
  86. Is John Carmack building a bomb? by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 3, Funny
    Seriously... isn't the thought of some programmer geek and a few friends funding their own space program just a little beyond believable? I would have to seriously question the veracity of their claims - has anyone noticed that they do not have any kind of video evidence of actually launching anything?

    I wouldn't put it past Carmack to construct a huge bomb. Everyone knows about his disturbing obsession with the occult (why else would he have made the Doom series like it is?) and his propensity for watching violence, so it's not at all outside the realm of possibility. There are many studies available that prove beyond a doubt that casual use of ultra-violent video games provokes violent behavior in children and adults alike.

    Just imagine, if you will, what a person who is exposed to these influences for 12 hours or more per day, and becoming intimately familiar with them, is going to become. Exploring space? Ha! Not likely. But, with large amounts of peroxide that he is trying to procure, he could build a pretty damn deadly explosive device. And who better to do it than the guy who invented exit wounds and exploding body parts in PC gaming? I think the Department of Homeland Security should keep a very close eye on Mr. Carmack - Timothy McVeigh was able to do more with less, and he wasn't nearly as well funded.

    --

    --sdem
    1. Re:Is John Carmack building a bomb? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put it past Carmack to construct a huge bomb.

      Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that if you wanted to, you could buy a plot of land and explode stuff on it to your heart's content, so long as you weren't polluting rivers (that flow onto someone else's land) or anything. Land of the free, right?

    2. Re:Is John Carmack building a bomb? by Kallahar · · Score: 1

      Try reading the site, carmack is a genius and clearly knows what he's doing.

      Travis

    3. Re:Is John Carmack building a bomb? by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      I would have to seriously question the veracity of their claims - has anyone noticed that they do not have any kind of video evidence of actually launching anything?

      http://www.armadilloaerospace.com

      Actually, I've noticed they do have said video evidence. In spades.

  87. Peroxide? by LongJohnStewartMill · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking about starting up a Hydrogen Peroxide business. Forget the moon, I just need a date.

  88. From 60 to /.'d in 4.5 seconds by argmanah · · Score: 1

    I think the ERPS webpage is about to gag and die. Please excuse the Karma whoring, Carmack's post follows below:

    * Subject: [ERPS] Peroxide production
    * From: John Carmack
    * Date: Tue Feb 4 22:02:01 2003
    * List-id: ERPS discussion list
    We are starting to get the distinct impression that FMC is fucking with us on the peroxide supply situation. We keep doing the things they say (spending thousands of dollars), and they keep coming up with some other reason we still can't buy peroxide (or just not return calls for weeks). They have strung us along for a long time now, and convinced us to stop talking to Degussa, but we still don't have peroxide.

    There was some talk about this a while ago, but I was a lot more hopeful about FMC, so I didn't pursue it -- maybe it is time to set up a new company on the scale of X-L Space Systems. I don't want to be in the chemical processing business, but I would probably be willing to be an anchor customer. I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.

    One of Michael Carden's customers has one of his concentrators, and is willing to do some peroxide production for us, but I would really prefer to work with a company, even a small one, that is devoted to peroxide, and really cares about all the details, not just someone that can feed a machine.

    Would any ERPS people be interested in actually running a business to do this? I would be happiest working with a proven production system (one of Michael's), but I could entertain notions of paying for more development work on the ERPS concentrators.

    This is sort of a trial balloon here -- if FMC turns around and ships us peroxide, that is still my preferred solution.

    John Carmack

    --
    Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
  89. finally! by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 1

    a working business model

    1. oxidate some alkylhydroanthraquinones and electrolysis of some ammonium bisulfate.
    OR
    create a reaction of that store of barium peroxide in your backyard along with some sulfuric acid and prepare (with acetone) by oxidation of isopropanol.
    2. sell to Carmack
    3. Profit!!!

    --
    I ate my sig.
  90. Actually he isn't being melodramatic enough by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The good stuff, rocket grade H2O2, can dissolve a human. Happened enough in WWII (ME-163 Komet pilots) to know it wasn't a fluke.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Actually he isn't being melodramatic enough by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Sure, but he's acting like the handling of chemicals that dangerous is something rare. It's not.

      Industry does it all the time, day in and day out. Those black liquid cars on the trains aren't all carrying oil. Those tanker trailers aren't all milk and gasoline.

      The infrastructure exists to get it there, and provided he's got what he's required to for handling it as an industrial entity, then the company should stop stonewalling him.

  91. Talk to the Researchers at Purdue by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 5, Informative

    Purdue University is doing lots of work with Peroxide based rockets. Armadillo should contact the Aero /Astro dept. there to get some tips on how to aquire the stuff. Just call the number on their web page.

    I think they couldn't get stuff above 80% because of transportation concerns... I believe that they were able to distill the 80% stuff up to higher concentrations. They've also developed catalysts that can be mixed with the peroxide as a colloid to get better performance.

    Purdue has just rehabilitated an Apollo-era test facility to do some engine tests. When they get up to full swing, they'll probably have the best facility at a University. Armadillo might want to contact them about using their facility for tests.

    If the Armadillo guys have halfway decent designs, I'm sure the Purdue people would love an excuse to light up a new engine.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:Talk to the Researchers at Purdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It all depends on if you are descibing something or enumerating a set of things with counting numbers. Counting numbers don't include 0 (natural numbers include 0).

      The boolean is a state, enumerating is different. Think about it - if you understand then maybe you'll be closer to a geek rather than someone that out-thinks.

      If you were conting base ten you would not say there are 1 types of people because you use 0 to identify the first item. 0 based conting in computer science is used as an offset frome a base value (most of the time) or to iterate, not to count the number of items. Think about it for a bit.

    2. Re:Talk to the Researchers at Purdue by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Dude, you were winning until you got to the end. :)

      I take it back, I misread the last phrase of the second-to-last sentence.

      Alright, you won. I yield to a fucking AC. Ah well. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Talk to the Researchers at Purdue by renecarlos · · Score: 1

      >I'm sure the Purdue people would love an excuse to light up a new engine.

      They already have an excuse- as caustic as people make H2O2 out to be, it's still safer than hydrazine, which is what is used today. Aside from being explosive (hence useful), hydrazine is carcinogenic and an inhalation hazard. Strict bunny-suiting required.

      Peroxide would require only splash shields and, I believe, filter masks.

      Some contractors (Aerojet?) have already received grants for H2O2 demonstrators- not primary propulsion, just maneuvering thrusters. There, you need the most safety, and you can accept a small performance drop.

  92. Growing Id? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    You know, I wonder. AFAIK, John Carmack was one of the ones at iD who was against growing the company too much (and this was one of the reasons Romero wanted to leave). I wonder if getting into all this rocket stuff would make him change his mind. Cars are one thing, but this stuff has to be expensive. A larger company would give him more money to spend on rocketry.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Growing Id? by Deekoo · · Score: 1

      A larger company wouldn't provide more money.
      It would, however, provide many more expenses and
      likely a fair bit of bureaucratic overhead.

      I'm quite glad that iD avoided the all-too-common
      suicidal tendency to Go Public. Were iD on the
      stock market, they'd probably be a wholly owned
      subsidiary of Microsoft right about now. With
      no funds available for Linux dev. Or for Big
      Rockets, because the Board of Directors will
      inform Carmack that "You know, if you get blown
      up we lose our investment, so we will sue you
      preemptively to ensure you behave."... Assuming
      that they didn't go bankrupt with everyone else
      stupid enough to let the same people who bought
      stock in Albertan diamond mines determine their
      worth...)

      --
      #include printf("[Yeemp: deekoo~tentacle.net]\n");
  93. Rocketguy has this part down at least by Syre · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've always been sceptical of the RocketGuy, but at least he has this part down and is distilling his own peroxide fuel (to 90% purity).

    Of course he does have to buy it (at 50% purity), so maybe that's a problem now too.

    1. Re:Rocketguy has this part down at least by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      The hydrogen peroxide fuel that Rocket Guy is going to use needs to be 90 percent pure. It can only be purchased at 50 percent purity. Rocket Guy is going to distill the hydrogen peroxide in this building to increase it to 90 percent purity. The steel building is a precaution due to the dangerous nature of high purity hydrogen peroxide.

      Uh.... Yeah. Why does this sound like something that's going to end up on the darwin awards...isn't steel reactive with peroxide?

      Just wait til he spills some on the floor!

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  94. peroxide isnt' the only rocket fuel by JDizzy · · Score: 1

    He could try Hydrogen/Floride reaction to produce similare results. He could go with a hybrid engine to to take advantage of relaxed chemical handling rules that he seems to be hitting. Peroxide is way too dangerous for Carmak to handle. Serriously! The version of peroxide he needs is very pure. The stuff you get at the pharmacy is like 2% or less of peroxide. The stuff he wants is so volitile that it cannot ever come in contact with any other substance, including air, or else you might have an explosion. Most of the time pereoxide is used as a catalist in the overall reaction. The best place to go for x-price feul is the local welders supply. If carmak were highly motivated, he could simply mix his own peroxide. But that would involve containment, and nobody wants to worry about that.

    There is several rules for handling the stuff, like you cannot have it within 1000 yards from train tracks (because of electro-static coming down the rails), and obviously a no smoking facility. Thats not all, pure peroxide needs to be incased in a layered cylinder where some type of innert matterial is in between the outside, and the inter peroxide tank. So getting pereoxide is hard, for good reasons. There is very few commercial applications of the stuff.

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  95. Peroxide by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I sure wouldn't sell him peroxide! He blows up, I get sued! NO WAY.

    I can just see him trying to make his own, too. EPA and OSHA would be all over him in a HURRY. That stuff is dangerous.

  96. Why not? it'd save money. by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1

    Half the peroxide would go to my ex-girlfriend. Half would go to Carmack.

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    1. Re:Why not? it'd save money. by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you're looking for. Take a look at what's offered before you run screaming.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  97. Peroxide's Formula by airrage · · Score: 1

    I think all you need to get peroxide is some baking soda, baby shampoo, and some yellow #5. I saw this on the discovery channel. Can't believe JC doesn't have the info on that one.

    I cannot keep solving all your problems, people, seriously I've got better things to do. Now, where should it rain tommorrow... ;)

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  98. Make your own! by kid_wonder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Talk to these guys

    --

    "Oh, you hate your job? There's a support group for that, it's called everyone, they meet at the bar."
  99. Beal Aerospace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The now defunct Beal Aerospace made TONS of the stuff for their booster testing. I have some names of the folks that use to worked there. Beal sold all of his equipment in a big auction about a year ago. I think the manufactering equipment may still be down a McGregor, TX which is just out side Waco, TX. Remember gentlemen this is highly explosive stuff, so equipment is installed at a munitions plant. Maybe somebody will give me a hint on how to contact John Carmack. I can't figure out how to get through all tha identity hiding and the links look that kind of hackerish. Maybe this is all the hints he needs.

  100. H2O2 Rocketry? by WatertonMan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I didn't know serious rocketry used this. Cool. I remember back in the days when toys could be fun and dangerous my making a small rocket in this way. Probably different than what these guys did. It was one of the "experiments" in my chemistry set I got for Christmas in the early 70's. Probably I was too young for such a thing, but boy did I love it. What are the chances of a Christmas present *these* days that comes with Sulfuric Acid, Hydrochloric acid and so forth and has instructions on making various explosives!

    My favorite experiment was the sulfuric acid mixed with sugar. I thought it was so cool that I quickly used up all the acid and made my Dad go out and find a big bottle of it.

    With all the regulations for liability now along with terrorist worries, it is probably impossible to even get half that stuff. No more ice cream made from liquid nitrogen now that I'm out of college.

    1. Re:H2O2 Rocketry? by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      For more indications of how liability issues are killing scientific exploration in young people, read Uncle Tungsten. As many Slashdotters can probably attest to (it was recently reviewed on here) - it's a fabulous book.

      This post IS on topic ! It has to do with how people can't get chemicals because of dangers they might cause.

      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

  101. Re:Easy by AdamTheBastard · · Score: 1

    1. score some peroxide
    2. place in rocket
    3. burn up on re-entry?

    not much room for profit.

  102. Only hackers see the value... by the_verb · · Score: 1

    Movies like October Sky nonwithstanding, most of the public doesn't see the value in private experimentation and exploration. 'Space' is something for crewcut jocks and military guys who'll plant a flag on Mars. Enthusiastic third parties who want to expand human knowledge (and do fun stuff along the way) are more likely to be seen as oddball eccentrics than contributors to space exploration.

    Sadly, in the wake of the Columbia disaster, they might be seen as a threat as well. Space Shuttle debris scattered across Texas could have spread toxins at random. If that happens with a privately funded craft, I think it's more likely to be seen as an act of dangerous tomfoolery than a tragic setback.

    Wow. I just used the word 'tomfoolery' in a /. post. I'm not sure if I should be amused, or ashamed.

    In any case, I think what Carmack and others are doing is great, but expecting cooperation from the public, or industry, is probably a little too optimistic for now.

    --v

  103. The Wonders of Peroxide by rammadon · · Score: 1

    What an awesome substance hydrogen peroxide is... dilute it can clean a cut, slightly more concentrated could bleach your hair... and at full potency could be a great rocket fuel! And it's cheap too... that is if you can get it...

    Anyone up for a trip to the grocery store? It coulnt be THAT many bottles to boil down and get rocket fuel... :-p

    I'd use solid hydrogen, you insensitive clods.

  104. Maybe by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Is there any money in it?

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  105. Industry Explosion by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 1

    With NASA's recent problems, there has been a lot of talk about promoting more private investment in rocketry.

    If you thought NASA had reliability problems, wait until a bunch of ex-dot-com starry-eyed MBAs and incompetent engineers hit the space scene. The stock market will be the least of our crashes.

  106. I think it is just economics... by Trepidati0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think they are getting ignored because they are "being mistreated". I think they are being ignored because they aren't spending money in the volumes that the peroxide companies would like. In many industries $100,000 is not alot.

    I deal with this situtation everyday as an electrical engineer in the aerospace industry. We ask for something and we get ignored because the amount we are willing to spend or the quantity we want is not worth their effort.

    It isn't personal, it is just economics. Money Paid - Product Cost - Product Overhead = Profit. In a chemical business, the margins are typically small, so they need to make it up in volume.

  107. it's about time by jpnews · · Score: 1

    I say it's about time that Carmack stops screwing around with those darn video games (you know, the stuff that pays for his toys) and get serious about starting a full-fledged rocketry company. Sure he's rich, but what has he really done for the world? Advances in low-cost rocketry stand to help us out a lot more than Doom III, yes? At 100K a year for peroxide, it sounds to me like he might be (gasp!) serious?

  108. Re:oops by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think that there was a MASSIVE spurt of postings... One moment, I was getting 4 posts.. then next I had over 100. Problems with the slash engine, or just a bunch of over-eager slashdot readers? You tell me.

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  109. Peroxide as fuel by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hydrogen peroxide as propellent needs to be very pure, and is pretty nasty stuff. The methods to produce the pure stuff are more expensive than average, and are patented and controlled by only one or two companies if I recall correctly.

    Linkage as follows:

    How Stuff Works article on peroxide rockets
    http://www.howstuffworks.com/question159. htm

    Peroxide FAQ
    http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp/FAQs/FAQ.h tml

    -Z

    1. Re:Peroxide as fuel by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The methods to produce the pure stuff are more expensive than average, and are patented and controlled by only one or two companies if I recall correctly.

      While I am sure that modern methods to make high purity peroxide economically are patented, keep in mind that the Germans were using this stuff to power their ME-242's etc. Clearly any process they were using is off-patent by now.

  110. David Bowie is the answer by OwlofCreamCheese · · Score: 1

    Look in David Bowie's Hair, there is plenty hidden there.

    --
    -You're wasting your time. Alfador only likes me.
  111. Maybe not such a good idea? by cbuskirk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are we really sure that we want the guy who has spent is whole life working on games about blowning sh%t up to be building a giant rocket?

    1. Re:Maybe not such a good idea? by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      Better him than anyone else. If we send something to another planet, we want to quickly prove to the aliens there that we know how to blow shit up.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    2. Re:Maybe not such a good idea? by xnixman · · Score: 1

      Are we sure it is a rocket and he doesn't really plan to shoot his payload into space with a BGG-2000?

      Dan

    3. Re:Maybe not such a good idea? by radja · · Score: 1

      so send Dubya to Mercury tonight.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    4. Re:Maybe not such a good idea? by thogard · · Score: 1

      Chem supply phone Sales Guy: So you want to buy a bunch of explosive chemicals, Right?
      John: Yep. Its for my rocket. I want to win the X prize.
      Sales Guy [while flipping through a FBI provided book]: I'm not sure I can sell you this stuff. It says here that your affiliated with scray people.
      John: What kind of scary people?
      Sales Guy: Head on a Pike kind of scary people.
      Sales Guy: Didn't you hang out with that John Romero guy?
      John: That was a while ago...
      Sales Guy: It looks like I can't sell you any of that anyway our computer says were out.
      John: Fine, I'll make my own [ckick]
      Sales Guy: FBI, you may want to hear about this...

  112. A bit naive by SimJockey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gotta love when people get way out of their element. This guy really needs to get over his persecution complex. FMC and Degussa likely aren't "jerking you around" for shits and giggles. There is a pretty substantial liability issue with fun stuff like peroxide, and even legitimate buyers likely have a whack of paperwork to wade through. I used to run through some of the paperwork to buy chlorine gas for water treatment plants. Chemical companies kinda want to know who you are before they go selling you potential weapons of mass destruction.

    Plus, $100K worth of peroxide may not be a big order to these guys. Small order means that they don't care as much about you, especially if you want some custom spec on it.

    What would be better for him to consider is a really experienced procurement specialist, who knows the market and can source things properly. Much better use of money than building your own production facility. Hire someone already in the chemical brokering business to handle the paperwork and pay them a fee for it. Way safer than some enlightened amatuer thinking that it can't be too tough to purify peroxide.

    --
    Laugh while you can, monkey boy!
    1. Re:A bit naive by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1
      FMC and Degussa likely aren't "jerking you around" for shits and giggles.
      True, but some little clerk at each place may be. Sometimes you just need to escalate things furthur up the tree, but only when you can be sure you can get by without some vindictive little clerk that really hates you now.
  113. its hard to know by Madcapjack · · Score: 1

    Its hard to know from the post who is exactly to blame. is the peroxide company to blame, or did the rocket team not fully anticipate whats involved in buying large amounts of volatile chemicals? since i don't know, i can't say.

  114. It's a lie! by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

    Carmack really just wants to abuse John Romero's hair.

    "Suck it down, Bitch."

    Man, I would PAY to see Carmack knock Romero down and dye his hair blonde. :)

  115. Sign me up!! by jokerghost · · Score: 1

    Great!! I've been looking for a way to convert my drug- er- chemicals production facility into a more viable business model! Sign me up! Just one thing, how much peroxide can one get per tanker stolen from farmers?

    -jokerghost

  116. Sounds like General Ashcroft at work..... by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 1

    ...I mean, who needs the government when individual citizens are encouraged to spy on each other. Everyone should be concerned with your business...."why would you possibly need 250 gallons of specially formulated peroxide? What could you possibly be doing with that? Are you a terrorist?"

    I guess I can kinda see where you wouldn't want any Joe to walk into your shop with an empty 5-gal. jerry can asking for explosive oxidizers, but If you are a legit. operation and you've got your papers in order, then "these arn't the droids you're looking for.." should be an acceptable answer.

    I've read some of the follow up replies too, and it sounds like the economy of the failed drug war will be opened to the custom chemical makers too...by that I mean decentralization of production by creating lots of little specialty shops instead of one easy to monitor monster shop (FMC). In the past, closing of the border only created lots of small producers state-side. Looks like this may happen with chemicals too.

    Good luck to our rocket boys....and remember the warning on CNN..."these chemicals can be dangerous...do not touch anything and call the authorities immediatly".......

    1. Re:Sounds like General Ashcroft at work..... by mitheral · · Score: 1

      "these arn't the droids you're looking for.." should be an acceptable answer.


      You understand that those were the droids they were looking for?

  117. Doom3 requirements by neonstz · · Score: 1

    Aha! Now we now the requirements for running Doom3!

  118. Armadillo Aerospace is not a corporation by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    That can be bought and sold, it's just a group of hobbyists.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Armadillo Aerospace is not a corporation by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      But they can still be blown up. But I seriously doubt that will happen.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  119. I concur! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    What is the world coming to when companies which usually sell explosives to the government won't sell explosives to the guy who programmed Quake or anyone else who is competing for a PRIZE for that matter! Competing for a PRIZE! It RADIATES CREDIBILITY!

    Much worse than this post are the posts which follow it. You know, the ones which say "This is the level of intellectual conversation which can be found on slashdot."

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  120. flourine??? by Goonie · · Score: 1
    Isn't that the stuff that a) will cause a clay brick to burst into flame if you drop one in it, and b) forms compounds with noble gases?

    Nasty, nasty, stuff, if I remember my chemistry class.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:flourine??? by JDizzy · · Score: 1

      yes, and its actually easier to get than peroxide.

      --
      It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  121. Quick primer on why peroxide is needed by Chairboy · · Score: 1

    Here's a quick primer on why peroxide is needed:

    His rocket sprays high concentration hydrogen peroxide across a silver catalyst. When hydrogen peroxide touches silver, it breaks apart and converts into heat and water (in the form of steam). The conversion ratio is something like 600 to 1 at 100% concentration, so it's a pretty violent stuff.

    The advantages of using a hydrogen peroxide rocket is that it is simple. You turn on a single valve, and peroxide is pumped/forced into the chamber and voila, you get thrust. No flames, no complicated ratios, etc.

    The disadvantages are that it's not as efficient as flaming rocket fuels. The ISP (a measurement of thrust and efficiency) is much, much lower for this monopropellent then, say, the liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen main engines on the shuttle.

  122. Quick Primer - Peroxide and Rocketry by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Peroxide is used by many space programs to get ships off the ground. It is used as follows:

    1. Take a big breasted brunette stripper.
    2. Use peroxide to bleach hair to an unnatural blonde.
    3. Use said stripper to wine and dine (and other fun activities) accountants into signing even LARGER checks... or to blackmail certain 2-4 stars in the Air Force.
    4. Use checks to purchase great parties, fantastic houses, and fast cars.
    5. Use left over peroxide and a catalyst to launch rocket... or use the left over change to buy a solid fuel rocket, or a hydrogen/oxygen rocket.

    Now you understand the wonderful world of peroxide use in modern rocketry.

    --
    meh
  123. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by david.given · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And no, I'm not being melodramatic. To be useful it needs to be 100%...

    Um, you can't get 100% hydrogen peroxide. It exists in equilibrium with water; above a certain critical point it spontaneously (and slowly) decomposes to produce water and dissolved oxygen.

    In fact, peroxide is a really great rocket fuel. It's cheap. It's easy to handle. It's environmentally friendly. It can be used in monoprop and biprop engines, depending on what you do with it. It's hypergolic, which means it's trivial to build restartable engines (the shuttle's engines aren't restartable; they can only start with assistance from the ground). It's safe, too --- much safer than hydrazine, the most common hypergolic fuel, which is horribly poisonous, carcinogenic and can be unstable, to boot.

    Yes, hydrogen peroxide can be nasty. It's a rocket fuel, for gods' sake --- it's supposed to decompose violently. You just have to be careful, and it's a hell of a lot easier to manage than stuff like liquid oxygen. Now, that stuff really is painful to handle.

    Peroxide isn't the best fuel; it's got a specific impulse of only about 160-190 seconds when used as a monoprop, but so does hydrazine. And, if you use it as a biprop with kerosene, it goes up to 200-230, which means your ship can have one small tank of kerosene for the main engines and one large tank of peroxide which runs the main engines plus the thrusters. Compare with the shuttle, which uses loads of different fuel types, each with their own storage and delivery systems.

    (The best fuels on the referenced page are in the region of 300 to 385. Hydrogen and flourine. Ack!)

    But hydrogen peroxide is the perfect choice for a small setup like Armadillo. All you need are a few simple safety precautions --- bleeder valves, non-reactive storage facilities, some basic technical expertise in handling the stuff --- and you're fine.

  124. Details by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1
    I'm curious about this and may even be getting involved in a chemical processing project soon (much less scary- just removing particulates from used fry oil) but I don't even know what to think without more specifics such as:

    How easy is it to ship?

    How volatile is it in storage?

    How long does a batch remain "usable"?

    Is this a material subject to any new and expanding anti-terror reporting reqiurements?

    How much would it cost to set up a plant? (space, money, staff, hours per staffer)

    Are there other salable compounds that can be made with the same setup?

    What are the production waste products?

    What are various peroxide formulations and how easy is it to switch from making one to making another?

    Are any other X-Prize teams using the same formulation?

    Does making this stuff require the consumption of lots of electricity and/or water?

    If water, then in what ways, if any, does it have to be pre-treated?

    Could a plant be made mobile, or at least "luggable" by building it into a large truck and bringing it onsite?

    Is this something that your average chem graduate student would be willing to make on a micro scale?

    Are there any vendors who might be willing to sell off their more marginal (small capacity, finicky, etc.) production equipment?

    Would this be doable by a department at a school like Carnegie-Mellon or Stevens that likes to show off their process engineering chops?

    If so, then could grant money be obtained?

    And, most importantly, does the whole staff end up blond? :-)

    The truth is, I think that I already know the answers to some of these, but years of project management has taught me never to assume.

    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  125. A peroxide plant? Hmmm ... by fygment · · Score: 1

    ... this guy, Al Kayda, asked me the same thing. And some very nice gentlemen from the FBI want to chat.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  126. Different stuff by Crash+Gordon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rocket-grade peroxide is pretty hairy stuff. The stuff you buy at the local corner store is mostly water (like maybe 3% peroxide). For propulsion you want concentrations of more like 90% - 95%. In these concentrations peroxide will consume just about anything which can be oxidized; it's particularly fond of organic material, such as people... No surprise he's having trouble getting it.

    Here's a decent FAQ on peroxide, with some stuff on rocketry uses included.

  127. C'mon! Spread the word! by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

    Tell all those fake blondes you know to lay off for a bit...

  128. Maybe He Should Order From Saddam Hussein? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Gawd knows, there doesn't seem like there's ANYTHING they can't find in Iraq.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  129. If he wants peroxide by nizcolas · · Score: 1

    let him scrape a knee and go crying to grandma. Lord knows she was never stingy with it.

    --
    If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
  130. repost by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    come on /., it's only been a few hours!

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  131. Ag grade by zogger · · Score: 1

    --you can get agricultural grade peroxide at 35% with no problems whatsoever, by the barrel for that matter, some folks use it in place of a bleach chemical for their swimming pools.

    Now, if he can get that, how hard is it to make it twice as concentrated? Back yard chemist in the house?

  132. I got some peroxide by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell him I'll trade for an advance copy of Doom 3 and a Radeon 9700 Pro.

    It's kind of ironic the author of Quake is going to try and rocket-jump to outer space.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  133. Re:oops by Blimey85 · · Score: 1
    This has been happening all day for me. It will say 27 comments, then I click read more, then there are no comments. Then I refresh and there are 5 or 100... kinda odd... but at least it's faster right now than it has been lately. And I understand that they are making changes to the code all the time so I'm not complaining mind you. I never bitch about stuff that's free... that's just rude.

    Anyway, on to the topic at hand:

    We know a few things about this fuel. First, it works really well. Second, it burns like a.. well, you know. Why are we not able to use something that works just as well yet is much safer? I thought the fuel of the future was supposed to be hydrogen with the only byproduct being water? I keep reading about how great it is, how some cars are using it or are going to start in the next couple years, how it's completey renewable, etc., etc., etc. So why is peroxide being studied and tested if hydrogen is so great?

    I think one thing we need to keep in mind is the safety factor. If a tank of peroxide explodes during a rocket launch, will any of the liquid make it back to the ground, or will there be any harmful residue that will make it to the ground? I'm assuming that most of the liquid would be burned and would not reach the ground but there could be a toxic cloud and/or harmful residue.

    --
    How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
  134. Plutonium by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    I think he should steal some Plutonium from Lybian terrorists... or invent Mr Fusion

  135. i thought you could get anything from the USA by simonharvey · · Score: 1

    how unusial! as a foreigner i as partially jealous and envious at the oppotunities that americans
    have that kiwis (dont laugh...) dont have.

    has he ever thought of making H2O2 himself?

    Once again this comes as a bit of a shock...

  136. Slashdotted Already by jaeson · · Score: 1

    Here is the article, cause it's already slashdotted...

    "We are starting to get the distinct impression that FMC is fucking with us on the peroxide supply situation. We keep doing the things they say (spending thousands of dollars), and they keep coming up with some other reason we still can't buy peroxide (or just not return calls for weeks). They have strung us along for a long time now, and convinced us to stop talking to Degussa, but we still don't have peroxide.

    There was some talk about this a while ago, but I was a lot more hopeful about FMC, so I didn't pursue it -- maybe it is time to set up a new company on the scale of X-L Space Systems.

    I don't want to be in the chemical processing business, but I would probably be willing to be an anchor customer. I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.

    One of Michael Carden's customers has one of his concentrators, and is willing to do some peroxide production for us, but I would really prefer to work with a company, even a small one, that is devoted to peroxide, and really cares about all the details, not just someone that can feed a machine.

    Would any ERPS people be interested in actually running a business to do this? I would be happiest working with a proven production system (one of Michael's), but I could entertain notions of paying for more development work on the ERPS concentrators.

    This is sort of a trial balloon here -- if FMC turns around and ships us peroxide, that is still my preferred solution.

    John Carmack"

  137. I never have any problem getting 30% H202 by sstory · · Score: 1

    I think from Aldrich. Maybe Sigma. Can't remember.

  138. Excellent peroxide source! by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    1. Contact chick on right
    2. Extract Peroxide from hair
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

    As a bonus, we'll throw in the smurf on the left

  139. Not very good business on the part of FMC by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1
    I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.


    Doesn't it seem a little backwards that a company doesn't want to see its product? Especially that much of it??
  140. Not exactly general interest news, but... by John+Carmack · · Score: 5, Informative

    I agree with some comments that this isn't exactly general interest news.

    I am not interested in hearing from every chem major that is interested in starting a business (already heard from a couple, that's how I found out about the slashdot story). However, if anyone here does happen to have a brother-in-law that is a VP at FMC or some such, a little nudge wouldn't hurt.

    The full story:

    Rocket grade peroxide is stabilizer free, and 85% - 100% concentrated, as opposed to drug store peroxide at about 3% concentration. You can get up to 70% peroxide reasonably easily, but the high concentration stuff is a specialty item.

    When we started our development work a bit over two years ago, we were doing some concentration of the peroxide ourselves, which is fine for making small test batches, but you really don't want to be making drums of the stuff, or you wind up spending as much time messing with that as you do building rockets.

    We had some initial discussions with FMC about that time, but they weren't terribly encouraging. Shortly thereafter, we made contact with X-L Space Systems, a small company that was producing 98% concentration peroxide and selling it reasonably to several small outfits, as well as NASA and the USAF. I wound up buying a dozen or so drums from X-L, and everything was going well.

    The owner of X-L was having such a hard time getting the government to pay their bills on time (he never had complaints about his small commercial customers) that he finally decided it just wasn't worth the headache, and he closed the company down. I was in discussion with him to make a large enough order to justify keeping production open, but we wouldn't need all that much peroxide for nearly eight months, so the storage logistics were looking troublesome. In hindsight, I should have worked something out, even if it was expensive or difficult.

    About six months ago, we started contacting FMC again. The details haven't been very pleasant, largely because we keep thinking we are almost there, and it keeps not being the case. If they would just tell me exactly what I have to buy to make them happy, I would gladly do it, but they keep finding new things. That is the "stringing us along" part. They are mumbling again about lawyers and liability at the moment, which we thought had been worked through previously.

    We have also spoken to Degussa about production, but they won't sell in drums, only large storage tanks (they supposedly have some drums in the US, but they are "promised to" NASA, and they won't sell them to us). We could live with that, but we broke off contact with them a while ago because FMC was sounding reasonable, but insisting that they be our sole supplier.

    This is one of the unfortunate tradeoffs in modern society -- in the 70's, FMC would just ship drums of peroxide to the guys doing rocket powered dragsters without any hassles (one of them sent me a scan of some of his old shipping invoices). Today, fears of liability are larger than basic business drives like making money with your product. I'm not a "back in the good old days" sort, I fully recognize that the other advantages of modern society outweigh the nanny-state disadvantages, but one can always hope for across-the-board improvements.

    Other than being almost out of peroxide, things are going very well for Armadillo. We rescheduled a lot of our development now that the X-Prize is fully funded, so we are parallel tracking full scale vehicle development with subscale flight testing.

    John Carmack

    1. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by glrotate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only thing that restrains it is a priori regulation.

      What happened to judges throwing out baseless cases?
      What happened to State Supreme Courts actually disbarring these pernicious highwaymen?

      Because the lawyers have been so pitiful in policing their own, it looks like Bush is going to do it for them.

    2. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      Maybe they're being lent on by NASA?

      NASA don't want you launching people, because it would cut into their launch business. Hey: Carmack launches for 1/10 the cost why don't you? If NASA launched for 1/10 the cost, then they need 10x less people, which means they spend 10x less in the voting districts which means they get 10x less appropriations... which means they'd spend 10x less with FMC.

      I'd bet dollars to donuts that FMC are worried about losing business to NASA, whether or not NASA are directly leaning on them.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by LenE · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can't believe that I am responding to a John Carmack post, and that I would actually have something substantive to add.

      Anyway, I used to work at FMC, although not in their chemical division. In the late nineties, FMC made a huge gamble by selling their defense interests, and diverting funds to hydrogen peroxide production, and lost big. The thought was that the demand for industrial hydrogen peroxide was going to skyrocket (pardon the pun), and it didn't.

      When all was said and done, FMC had so much peroxide production capacity that went unused, that it became a huge liability. Where this is leading is that if you aren't going to use let's say more than 100,000 gallons of peroxide, they probably wouldn't think of selling any to you.

      Don't take it personally. Oh, and the current CEO was known internally as quite a hatchet man throughout his carreer at the company. Since I no longer work there, I can say that he was quite an asshole (unlike his predicessor). Whenever Neidermier showed up at our site, he canned people with something that approximated a dartboard method (in a large assembly of employees no less). He cuts operations and personnel on a whim, so his inner circle would probably not get on his bad side by giving some charity to a cool project. Sorry to spoil the benevolent VP dream.

      -- Len

    4. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by LenE · · Score: 1

      I know it's bad form to reply to myself, but that should be 100,000 gallons per week, for an annual contract.

      -- Len

    5. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by sean23007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If NASA could launch for 10x less, they wouldn't fire 90% of their scientists, they'd probably launch 10x more (or actually like 7x more, and stay within budget so as to spend more time/money on safety).

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    6. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by cardshark2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Me: frantically looks for the "+1, Carmack" moderation option.

      Need any more programmers John? I'll work twice as long as anybody you've got for half the pay! I'll teach you how to play Quake 3. I'll even wash your car three times a week and wax it with a chamois. I'll personally distill your peroxide for you at no charge.

      I'll be damned if I'm gonna test fly that rocket for you though, I mean, a man's got to draw the line somewhere.

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    7. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 1

      Mr. Carmack,

      If you're looking for some other sources of H2O2, here are some suggestions:
      1. SNPE - they make oxidizers for France's munitions industry, and should be willing to sell if FMC and others are not.
      2. Contract manufacturing. Most commercial H2O2 is sold as a 30% solution, and then diluted down to the 1-3% solution you buy in medical supply. The more concentrated material (50%) is made by distallation. Perhaps by purchasing the diluted material, you can hire someone to distill it for you. You may have some success there.
      3. Purchase sodium percarbonate and use that as your H2O2 source. Sodium percarbonate is Na2CO3+2(H2O2). Its the same material that makes Oxyclean work when dissolved in water. Water basically releases the H2O2 from the sodium carbonate structure. Sodium percarbonate should work as a solid propellant, as it releases H2O2, and, upon heating/flame conditions would also release CO2.

      I don't know if any of this will be of help to you, but I hope you are able to get your program forward.

      --
      -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
    8. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      What, and they wouldn't be willing to sell the production capacity itself? One would think they'd be glad to be rid of the plant, and whatever other parts of it they could transfer ownership of.

    9. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      What happens is that the sued businesses still have to invest significant $ for a long while fighting the case, which they are not guaranteed to get back and most likely will not get any profit from. Businesses exist to make a profit, not (in theory) to make interest-free loans to the legal industry.

    10. Re:Not exactly general interest news, but... by LenE · · Score: 1

      They built a F'n huge plant for this stuff. IIRC, this one plant more than doubled their total production capacity for peroxide.

      You have to understand that this company will contract for anyone but sub-contracts to no-one. They would sell the whole thing outright (not likely) rather than sell excess capacity to anybody who could be considered a potential customer or potential competitor.

      -- Len

  141. In Soviet Russia, Rockets John Carmack Builds!

    Wait a minute....

  142. Little help by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    I need to some rocket fuel as well, for purely "extra curricular" purposes, could the /. readership help me out too ?

  143. Ummm... by shadowbolt · · Score: 1
    Jeezus... what was the first thing that clued me in to your being an idiot? lets see... Microsoft openGL? Are you crazy? Microsoft employees are probably fired if they use the word 'open'! it's MS Direct3D competing with OpenGL.

    I won't even go into the whole "doom and quake caused columbine" thing. What those two psychos did four or five years ago was heinous and evil. I wont debate that. But why do you (and so many others, for that matter) attribute their actions to a computer game? Sure, its violent and gory, but I and countless others play such games and have no compulsion to commit a mass murder. NONE!

    OK, so perhaps those games could have contributed to the deaths of 20 or so innocent people at columbine high school, but chances are that would have happened whether or not those 2 kids had played quake or UT. that simply cannot be the sole reason for that crime, so you simply cannot unfairly blame those games for that terrible act, and especially not Jon Carmack.

    alright, so i went into the whole "doom and quake caused columbine" thing. sue me. but you're wrong. dead wrong. i just cant believe some people are that dull-witted.

  144. Peroxide shortage explained! by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just found out where it all went

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  145. Redundancy Notice.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "...there has been a lot of talk about promoting more private investment in rocketry"

    Attention: Please resist the urge to post the obvious "If MS made a rocket, it'd crash, herrr herr herr" joke. It's about as funny as a Windows user making USB support jokes about Linux. Thank you.

  146. Terrorists by geders · · Score: 1

    [political sarcasm]
    I'm sorry, but anyone who wants to buy peroxide for rocketry is a terrorist. G.W. will back me up on that.
    [/political sarcasm]

    Peroxide (high concentration stuff) is actually really hard to get and quite dangerous...I don't think many people will be signing up to make peroxide

  147. No shit, there's a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There's a reason they won't sell. The shit is INCREDIBLY dangerous. Rocket fuel is either extremely volatile, explosive, poisinous, or all of the above.

    Some of the stuff nasa uses on the shuttle is lethal in microscopic amounts; I remember reading that maintenance on certain components(despite being unpressurized/offline) is done in full, sealed isolation suits. That's one reason NASA told everyone to keep the hell away from debris. You could literally pick up something and be dead minutes later.

    Probably also helped, at least a little, to keep people from scavenging.

  148. Try Iraq. by simetra · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hear they help people find good chemicals. Heh.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Try Iraq. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down as redundant please, I made the exact same joke 40 minutes before that:
      http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid =52934& threshold=2&commentsort=1&tid=134&tid=126&tid=160& mode=thread&cid=5236326

      Though the /. server's been acting buggy today too. Was like watching a time machine operate, first 127 posts, then 7, then 3.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  149. Think about it... by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

    Would YOU give peroxide to someone responsible for Doom and Quake?

    --
    For great justice.
  150. Here are some sources... by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

    Ratt
    Motley Crue
    Warrent
    Whitesnake
    David Lee Roth
    Poison
    Firehouse
    etc...

    I bet they have tonnes to spare.

  151. Have you tried a drugstore? by verch · · Score: 1

    I feel like I'm missing something.. I just checked drugstore.com.. 99 cents for 16oz. Ok, I realize buying 50,000 bottles from a drugstore isnt realistic, but this stuff is clearly regularly available. He seems to be complaining that he tried one place and they gave him the run around.

  152. Wow by Grip3n · · Score: 1

    We all know John makes engines for the future, but I think he's really outdoing himself this time...

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
  153. A good source for peroxide. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



    Walgreens, in the hair care section.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:A good source for peroxide. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

      That last troll was posted by:


      McDaniel, Scott mcdev@mcdev.com, pipebomb@pipebomb.net

      McDaniel Development
      2139 Old Highway 5 South, and..
      637 Riverside Dr.
      Ellijay, Georgia 30540, United States
      Tel: (706) 698-5112

      Feel free to call this troll. He's lives with his mom, and that's her voice in the answering machine message. Every time Mr. McDaniel decides to troll, another copy of his personal info will be posted immediately afterward.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

  154. Are you nuts? by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
    Anyone want to start a peroxide business?

    And contribute to the blonde population? I don't think so!

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  155. It has other uses too. by hayden · · Score: 1
    My suggestion is go liquid fuel-- you can get liquid oxygen without too much hassle (needed for everything from medical to welding) and the fuel could consist of anything from kerosene to acetylene.
    Also good if you're late to a BBQ.
    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  156. obligatory post-slashdot-effect posting by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
    We are starting to get the distinct impression that FMC is fucking with us on the peroxide supply situation. We keep doing the things they say (spending thousands of dollars), and they keep coming up with some other reason we still can't buy peroxide (or just not return calls for weeks). They have strung us along for a long time now, and convinced us to stop talking to Degussa, but we still don't have peroxide.

    There was some talk about this a while ago, but I was a lot more hopeful about FMC, so I didn't pursue it -- maybe it is time to set up a new company on the scale of X-L Space Systems.

    I don't want to be in the chemical processing business, but I would probably be willing to be an anchor customer. I want to buy $100,000 worth of peroxide this year.

    One of Michael Carden's customers has one of his concentrators, and is willing to do some peroxide production for us, but I would really prefer to work with a company, even a small one, that is devoted to peroxide, and really cares about all the details, not just someone that can feed a machine.

    Would any ERPS people be interested in actually running a business to do this? I would be happiest working with a proven production system (one of Michael's), but I could entertain notions of paying for more development work on the ERPS concentrators.

    This is sort of a trial balloon here -- if FMC turns around and ships us peroxide, that is still my preferred solution.

    John Carmack


    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  157. Wrong Idea by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

    Here I was thinking that John Carmack was going to perfect the art of Rocketing Jumping...

  158. One source not to try.... by ZoneGray · · Score: 1

    Well, whatever Carmack does, tell him he's wasting his time if he asks for help from the UN Weapons Inspectors. Those guys couldn't find rocket fuel if you shot one up their collective ass.

  159. Blame Canada! by pixel_bc · · Score: 1

    Move to Canada. Apparently, it's somewhat more easy to get your hands on H202, particularily on the west coast because of the high concentration of industrial plants working in the pulp industry.

    A simple google search found a few distributers dealing in > 60% concentrations of the stuff.

  160. Contrary to popular belief... by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 1

    The world was not created by Carmack.

    1. Re:Contrary to popular belief... by hyptest1 · · Score: 1

      Nope. He's got other people handling content creation. He just does the final rendering ;) eric

  161. Re:Jon Carmack: dooming society by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    Flip-flop the OpenGL and Direct3d and you have it right. Jon has promoted OpenGL to the detriment (though not too much) of MS's Direct3D.

  162. So what? by g4dget · · Score: 1
    Let people blow themselves up if they like. If an adult orders it, the supplier should not be responsible for this.

    Now, there is some minor concern that someone might use this to blow up someone else, but I think that worry is disproportionate. There are lots of cheaper and simpler ways of blowing things up (fertilizer, for example).

    With this kind of insane nannying by the government and courts, it's no wonder that people don't go into engineering and the sciences as much anymore. You can still crash on your motorcycle, roll yourself over in your insanely imbalanced SUV, kill yourself rock climbing, or even have yourself blown up in a rocket for billions of dollars courtesy of the US tax payer, but if you want to do something stupid with chemicals at home, the lawsuits start flying and everybody gets very protective.

    1. Re:So what? by g4dget · · Score: 1
      RTFA. There is no nannying by the government or courts. He used to have a supplier, couldn't present enough to demand to stay with them, and is now having a problem with a different company. In fact it has nothing to do with anything but a crappy company. Why people are discussing to death this one small business problem is beyond me.

      RTFA yourself: the supplier is pretty clearly afraid of various liability issues.

      Even if FMC weren't providing the peroxide out of fear of liability (which seems unlikely, since THAT'S WHAT THEY SELL), it would be a matter of civil litigation and have nothing to do with "nannying".

      Ummm... civil litigation is based on laws and the courts.

      Go back to your libertarian cubbyhole where you can have your own way with everything. People as dumb as you are the reason the rest of us have to deal with repressive regulation where it DOES exist.

      I'm not a libertarian by a long shot. I believe in strong government regulation for lots of things. But I draw the line at trying to protect stupid people from blowing up themselves.

  163. Maybe her should just focus on Doom III by Denver_80203 · · Score: 1

    That could use some help getting off the ground.

  164. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  165. We'll be nice to them if they be nice to us.. by XJoshX · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Whether or not my brother in law is the CEO of FMC may depend on whether or not you can give me an FTP site with the latest build of Doom3... ;)

  166. Why not NITROMETHANE? by swordboy · · Score: 1

    They used nitromethane as a monopropellant previously... Why not again?

    Aside from being much safer (safer than gasoline or alcohol - 25 percent of the heat energy in gasoline) to transport, it contains nearly 50 percent oxygen, by weight.

    Sounds like a winner to me.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Why not NITROMETHANE? by gurudyne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nitromethane can be overly exciting to use as a monopropellant. The flame front has a tendency to creep upstream, past the injectors, through the fuel lines and into the fuel tank.

      Backfire with a vengance.

      --
      Hey, Mom! Is it beer, yet?
    2. Re:Why not NITROMETHANE? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Nitromethane can be overly exciting

      If you want some excitement try trinitrotolulene :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  167. Jeez! by ZaphodCrowley · · Score: 1

    And all he wanted to do was rescue some Marines stranded on Phobos. Damned insensitive peroxide dealers....

  168. John why not.. by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    Solve FMCs problem to get the order? How? Gee I don;t know purchase liability insurance and show him the policy?

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  169. Try Canada by Morris+Schneiderman · · Score: 2, Informative

    "I deal with this situtation everyday as an electrical engineer in the aerospace industry. We ask for something and we get ignored because the amount we are willing to spend or the quantity we want is not worth their effort."

    Depending upon what you need, you might consider looking to get it in Canada. Canada is a much smaller market (only 10% as large as the USA) so Canadian manufacturers have had to become very good at small production runs and custom orders.

    The North American Free Trade Agreement makes it relatively painless to get things across the border and $1.00 US gets you about $1.50 Canadian, so you typically get more for your money, too.

    If you can't find what you want on your own, check us out at www.ProjectsDoneRight.com

    We have contacts that may be able to help.

    Morris

  170. I've got some... by jaysones · · Score: 1

    that I'll trade for a beta of Doom. It's in a little bottle in my bathroom right now.

  171. An explanation about the Kursk comment by Meridun · · Score: 2, Informative

    Erris has it right here. You seem to have stumbled upon a fairly well-known engine design for torpedoes that's been around since the 60s I believe. Unfortunately, high concentration H2O2 is a very dangerous oxidizer that can do quite nasty things if not treated VERY carefully. The russian sub Kursk was sunk when one of these torpedoes caused an explosion in the forward torpedo room and blew out the front side of the hull.

    1. Re:An explanation about the Kursk comment by Alsee · · Score: 1

      The russian sub Kursk was sunk when one of these torpedoes caused an explosion in the forward torpedo room and blew out the front side of the hull.

      Overheard on the bridge of the Kursk:

      "Oops? Who just said OOPS? What do you mean OOPS?!! "

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  172. That's probably restricted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For What It's Worth;

    In my college some guys were trying to get a less powerful (solid) fuel for their toy rocket but it's use is restricted by the militaries because it could be used to create misiles or bombs for terrorists. :(

  173. Ha! by corebreech · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet he feels silly over having left all those peroxide drums laying around when writing DOOM.

  174. HF has too large of enviromental impact. by lukme · · Score: 1

    It may be easier to get, but man, I sure as hell don't want the spaceship flying overhead to be spewing out hydrogen floride.

  175. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  176. Can anyone say DELIVERY VECHILE? by bozojoe · · Score: 1

    Doesnt rockets to space translate to ballastic delivery vechile

    (and so I dont spell check)

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  177. Rhodium, Palladium, Platinum, Gold and Silver by QuietRiot · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Would you like to make 90% H2O2 from 50% food or electronic grade peroxide that costs $0.33 USD per pound???


    Well Tecnologia Aeroespacial Mexicana sells hydrogen peroxide distillation stills made entirely in borosilicate glass _image_ that merely removes the excess water. $5900 USD for a 20L unit.


    They also sell a special catalyst _image _ made of Rhodium, Palladium, Platinum, Gold and Silver.


    They also build rocket engines for satelites and jet packs. They also race jet cars and jet bikes. A link to some people that do this sort of thing....

    Some info from the site... :
    The hydrogen peroxide rocket engines are in fact steam rockets, but this steam is produced by a violent exothermic reaction of the peroxide. When passed through a catalyst pack, it decomposes into superheated steam and oxygen. This steam and oxygen at high pressure is expelled supersonically through a DeLaval nozzle, which produces thrust.
    For each volume of liquid injected at the catalyst, after the reaction you get 600 times this volume expelled at the nozzle.

    The most important part of these rockets are the catalyst pack, other elements of the system are a stainless steel pressure tank to hold the peroxide, a pressure tank to store nitrogen to pressurize the peroxide, a pressure regulator, a flow regulator, valves, lines and gauges.

    The nitrogen is used to pressurize the peroxide tank and push the peroxide outside the tank. When a flow valve is opened the peroxide is injected into the injection plate of the rocket.
    The catalyst is made of many silver screens that in the reaction converts the liquid hydrogen peroxide into very hot steam and oxygen at a high pressure, this jet of gas is used to impulse the vehicle.

    This kind of rocket together with steam or a hot water rocket is the safest of all the rocket engines. This rocket does not produce flame and between the rocket is considered a cool rocket that doesn't need cooling and can be made of stainless steel.

    The Hydrogen Peroxide is the same product used as antiseptic, but in space and rockets it is used at 80% to 98% strength, I use it at 90% and I produce my own peroxide.

    The Hydrogen Peroxide is the only product used in the reaction, this places it in the monopropellant liquid rocket fuel classification.

    The Hydrogen Peroxide contrary to many false information I read in the web, is a clear liquid, non volatile, non explosive, non inflammable and non toxic product that looks like water but with a great amount of oxygen, thats why in many languages its name is "oxygenated water", this product has a slight biting odor and a little bit irritating for the eyes, at the contact with the skin and the eyes it produces oxidation burns, so you must always wear rubber gloves and a face mask to cover your eyes.

    This product increase its stability with concentration, yes!, the more pure and concentrated, the more stable!.
    The 90% hydrogen peroxide must be stored in special 5254 aluminum alloy containers with vented caps in shaded or fresh rooms preferably, the product is safer to store than gasoline!, but you must store it in approved containers for hydrogen peroxide service.

    The hydrogen peroxide is unstable only if it is contaminated and decomposes easily with almost any impurity, the heavy metals, some strong alkalis and the permanganates decompose it instantaneous liberating a great amount of energy in the form of very hot steam and oxygen.


    At this strength the hydrogen peroxide is a very strong oxidizer and upon contact with organic mater it is burned, for instance if you soak a cotton rag with 90% hydrogen peroxide it burns very fast, also it can react in a hypergolic way if mixed with other chemicals.

    1. Re:Rhodium, Palladium, Platinum, Gold and Silver by krysith · · Score: 1

      Damn, beaten to post. NEways, Buchi Analytical http://www.buchi-analytical.com also makes concentrators, but they are not as cheap, so tecaeromex looks like a better bet.

  178. What I want to know is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...producing 98% concentration peroxide and selling it reasonably to several small outfits, as well as NASA and the USAF. I wound up buying a dozen or so drums from X-L, and everything was going well.....

    You didn't happen to conveniently place those drums next to the people guarding your facility, did you? :)

    -Greg

  179. Price of Peroxide by jfmiller · · Score: 1

    According to this article peroxide is ~$0.40 /lb

    http://www.manufacturing.net/pur/index.asp?layou t= articleWebzine&articleid=CA120248

    --
    Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
  180. Actually, I DO work in industry. by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    Hence my comments about safety and refusal to work with said substance. If you'd like I'd be happy to put you in contact with the people that review (Safety review) all of our procedures. Wanna guess which ones cause the most grief?

  181. Re:Jon Carmack: dooming society by Splab · · Score: 1

    You got to be fucking kidding..
    "What was the main reason for the mass murder of dozens of people in columbine? Doom. It's always the same story..."
    I've been playing violent games since my early youth, first pirate games/police (what the hell was that called?), then pac man and when wolfenstein came that was the thing - scared the living crap out of me and my friends (age 7-8 I think) but was funny as hell also. Since I've moved on to almost every good shoot-em-up game there is - and guess what - I havent gone balistic in some school nor killed off a few fellow citizens. This is not the games at fault, it is society at fault. You can judge your society by the guys in prison. Here in Denmark every murder hits the front page on national newspapers (doesnt happen that much around here). And instead of blaming every one else for your misery try looking in the mirror... By the way, didn't US just have a guy commiting suicide on live webcam? now that is one fucked up country.. and we let them have nuke's...

  182. thanks for being inteligent by JDizzy · · Score: 1

    Serriously!

    I was wondering if anybody would counter my point with the subject you mentioned. Actually Hydrogen/Oxygen would be ideal.... but hydro-floride is cheap, and easy to produce. Hydrogen-peroxide is expesive, and hard to produce. Even harder than oxy/hydro impulse power. I thik that Carmak is going to have the exact same problem I had getting fuel.

    You see, I'm a member of the trippoly association. We gateher at the black rock desert every year for high altitude launches of out rockets. Yes, i used to be into high powered amature rocketry, like Carmak is into now. I know about all the goverment restrictions, and the difficulties in getting certain matterials. Carmak will nver get his peroxide. It is simply too dangerous to handle for the civilian public. Especially in his biz park colocation facility. In Mesqite texas, 5 miles from my residence.

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  183. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

    No, he's saying that hydrogen and fluorine could be used as a propellant system, and that they'd make a darn good combination, at least in comparison with other chemical propellants. It all boils down to producing an intensely exothermic redox reaction. Fluorine is the most electronegative element, and thus rapidly oxidizes most substances- you can "burn" asbestos in a fluorine atmosphere. The more energetic the redox reaction, the more energy you get from the same amount of fuel (higher specific impulse).

    It's great in theory, but I believe you've already grasped why this system is not used in practice, at least by anyone I've ever heard of- the clouds of hydrofluoric acid. Plus, it's not like elemental fluorine is inexpensive, or easy to handle, or anything like that- there isn't enough of a performance advantage to choose it over liquid hydrogen/LOX or hydrazine/dinitrogen tetroxide, and the prospect of producing acid rain that can etch glass and melt bones pretty much strikes it from the list.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  184. What's H20 4? by danpbrowning · · Score: 1

    What's H20? (Water, right?) Then what's H204? ...

    H20 is 4 drinking. ;-)

    --
    Daniel
  185. Another Dumb Joke by Ugmo · · Score: 1

    These government shenanigans remind me of another dumb joke.
    Before they built the chunnel they had put the project up for bid. Everyone was bidding multiple billions of dollars but then one guy comes up and says he can do it for a flat $1million.

    Did he win the contract? No. Because the next guy goes to the beuracrat in charge and says he'd do it for $2billion + $1million. $1billion for guy #2. $1billion for the government guy's private bank account and the leftover million goes to pay the first bidder to do the actual work.

  186. Re:What kind? indeed by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1
    some kinds of sex have absolutely nothing to do with motherhood.


    and vice-versa if you take the Bible as ... umm .. gospel truth.

  187. Need peroxide??? by skermit · · Score: 1

    Look no further... Come to New Jersey where the hair is big, and the hair is blonde... bleached. We've got enough peroxide you can strain from all the Guma's around here (watch any episode of Sopranos and you can see proof). Heh.

    --
    -Christopher Wu
    http://www.christopherwu.net/
  188. I suspect... by McDoobie · · Score: 1

    That people (and suppliers) wont start taking these teams and start up companies seriously until they have some major sponsors.(UPS and FedEx come to mind.)

    I'm curious what kind of Public Relations would a large shipping company like UPS or FedEx would get from sponsoring such a thing. It would at least be a great marketing gimmick.

  189. Use very pure aluminum by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

    Very pure aluminum (3000 series I think) is used for storage tanks. The aluminum forms a self repairing oxide layer. Organics are a no-no around powerful oxidizers.

  190. Residue? by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 2
    Peroxide is EXTREMELY unstable. While a leak has some immediate effects, it leaves very little in the way of harmful byproducts. After a very short time (often HOURS), there will be nothing left but water. Of course, plenty of things will be oxidized in the process.

    Since iodine catalytically breaks down peroxide, it is relatively harmless if it lands in the ocean. The halflife would be quite short.

    As for reasons for using peroxide, liquids are denser than compressed gasses. It really is that simple.

    1. Re:Residue? by redfenix · · Score: 1

      ...liquids are denser than compressed gasses

      Not to nitpick or anything, but isn't that really all relative depending on what is the liquid and gas being compared are made of? Furthermore, what is any liquid but a compressed gas?

      (remembering chem class with water boiling at room temp in decompression...)

      --
      "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
    2. Re:Residue? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
      Liquid is (almost) always going to be far denser than gas. With enough compression you can force just about any gas into a liquid state, but holding it in that liquid state requires thicker walled containers.

      Liquid or gas, Peroxide probably has a slightly lower available energy per KG of fuel, but my guess is that this is more than made up for the fact that it's easier to contain a given weight of OH than it is of pure O2 or H2.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  191. A Peroxide alternative. by McDoobie · · Score: 1

    Have you considered Flourine?

    They make it in large quantities for etching glass and flouridating water supplies. It's all over the place. Shouldn't be too hard to get your hands on some.

  192. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

    In fact, if you read up on what killed the Kursk, they say it was indeed an innocuous little substance that looks like water- Peroxide.

    They say what killed the Kursk was starting a torpedo motor in air. It was designed to run in water, so it quickly overheated in air, and that's what ruptured the tank. The peroxide hit the copper fittings in the torpedo room, underwent an oxidising reaction, and the pressure lew out the hull (subs are built to withstand external pressure, no-one was worried about internal pressure).

  193. On a related note - Doom 3 and rocket fuel by fredrikj · · Score: 1

    If you have the leaked Doom 3 alpha (of course you don't, I don't have it either because I'm loyal to id Software), look at the cardboard boxes in the second map. You'll find that there's a warning sign with the number 3293, which is the hazard number for hydrazine (a kind of rocket fuel). Any ideas from where they got those boxes? =P

  194. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid you are a little behind the times..

    Not only is LH/LF tested as a rocket propellant in the 1960s (the X430 and RD350 motors) in both the USA and USSR.

    FLOX (30 and 70), a particularly nice mixture of liquid fluoring and oxygen, was used in the atlas rocket and tested in a number of applications (the newer saturn V would have used it, had they ever been built..)

    It is assumed that FLOX was also tested in some early ICBM and standoff military systems, however they soon realised that solid fuel was the only answer here..

  195. Terrorism maybe the culprit here by objwiz · · Score: 1

    Since H202 can be used to make rocket fuel, some one could use for less scruplous purposes than the X-prize. I imagine that companies are getting parnoid (maybe even harassed) about selling H202 to anyone but the government. Companies may be even be afraid of getting sued (in the US anyways) if it turns out their products were used in the "commission of a crime".

  196. why not go for the AERO rocket fule by Meshsmooth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I rember reading somwhere that an inventer made a rocket fule from apoxy resin, gear oil and oxygen. The oxigen was bubbeled through the oil apoxy mixture with micro bubbles and then given a gentle rotation to move more bubles to the bubles to the center to create a more sturdy exteria and a more oxigen rich core. This fule was cheap stable and almost as powerfull as the nasa booster rocket fule. AERO as in the chocklate bar sponsored the invention (it looked like the chockolate too. This all from the memory of reading an article years ago so correct me if you can

  197. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by Slashamatic · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember reading that Fluorine-Diborane was about the best, but the impulse thing only works if the combustion chamber contains the reaction and shoots out the combustion product through the expansion nozzle.

  198. AppleJack process for making Conc H2O2 by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    The only way I know of to get conc H2O2 is to make it starting from the 3% crap you get out of the grocery store.

    The ( i admit never actually tried by me ) process is the same as used in the olden days to make applejack out of fermented apple cider.
    Alcohol ( and I believe H202 as well ) freezes at a lower temp than water. By filling a barrel with apple cider( or hair bleach ) and nailing it to an oak tree in the winter you cause ice crystals to form around the outside of the barrel. The wind blows and rattles the barrel around and soon the alcohol or H2O2 drains from between them into the center of the barrel. Then another cold spell and more of the water freezes and sticks to the outside of the barrel. By the end of the winter, the cold and wind have caused most of the water to freeze around a ball of concentrated alcohol/H2O2 by drilling a hole in the hollow ice, you can drain it out.

    Of course you can distill alcohol, but this doesn't work for H2O2 since it would decompose under the heat. So you have to concentrate it by freezing.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  199. H2O2 is not an attractive terrorist weapon by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    Considering that it is a low explosive at most, why not use gunpowder to make a bomb.

    Buying an exotic chemical like H2O2 would make it easy for the cops to trace it right to you. Though gunpowder is sold in every Wal*Mart, you could make large quantities yourself even less tracably. Just go down to Home Depot or any other Hardware Store or Agway and pick up either Potassium or Sodium Nitrate fertilizer. Sulfur is available for $2.00/lb at most Agways as fungicide ( though my local one seems to sell copper sulfate for that now you might have to look ) but even if you can't find sulfur, and mix in powdered charcoal briquettes, you can mix confectioner's sugar directly with KNO3 or NaNO3 to make something that will explode. Completely untracable as long as you wait a year or so after purchasing or buy it somewhere far away. You could have your own Keg of gunpowder like on Bugs Bunny & Yosemite Sam for 30 bucks.

    Or you could easily make nitroglycerine from stuff from Wal*Mart/Home Depot and use it to set off a charge of Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer ala Tim MicVeigh ( tho he had commercial primacord that is not something most people have access to so homemade Nitro Glycerine would have to be used ) If you don't want to blow your head off making Nitroglycerine, there are tons of other High explosives you can make easy: Mercury Fulminate for instance, Or Silver Fulminate, or that stuff the palestinian suicide bombers strap to themselves to blow up israelis. That stuff is made with hair bleach and other stuff from the grocery hardware store though I forgot what it is. THe recipe is on totse.com . You need a refrigerator to make it or it is WAY too unstable to use/store.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  200. Re:oops by The_K4 · · Score: 1

    Yeah hydrogen IS the fule of the future, however in cars and stuff you have air to use in the reaction. In rockets and in space you need to supply the Oxygen for it as well. So you mix the two.....H2O2....wait....it's hydrogen peroxide........:)

  201. Peroxide is very expensive by heroine · · Score: 1

    That's probably why they moved away from peroxide in the 60's. Liquid hydrogen might be producable from home-made components. Merely electrolyze water and refrigerate it with several stages of liquid nitrogen and compression.

  202. Re:Jon Carmack: dooming society by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

    I call troll!

  203. Re:What kind? (OT) by Squiffy · · Score: 1

    Isn't is sad when you make an intelligent joke, only to have people call you a "dumbass" because of a misunderstanding? I guess you just have to laugh at the irony.

  204. aluminum powder source & DIY by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    Not that it's pure or cheap, but the stuff sold by art supply houses as "bronzing powder" is, in some colors, basically powdered aluminum. I used that a few years back for some experiments of my own. (My, that stuff is exothermic!)
    When I was thinking of using the stuff on a larger scale my plan was to buy big hunks of aluminum and grind them down to powder myself, then use the same sorts of techniques gold prospectors use (settling tanks, long channels, curved sections to use centrifigal force, etc.) to separate the powder by composition and size. Primitive, but cheap and can be made more precise over time.
    And, yes, I did consider using various light oils or other fluids as the transport medium.
    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  205. Re:viability by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    Not that I should be responding to such an obvious troll but here goes.
    1.) Nobody personally has ALL the skills to build rockets. It's a safe bet that John C. has more of them then you. Or most managers at NASA for that matter.
    2.) Location? I'ld say either rural Texas, where nobody much cares and land is cheap, or the nearest good spot near the Oklahoma Space Port, where they've already committed to this sort of thing.
    3.)"Major undertaking"? Duh. Nobody is claiming otherwise. Right above this post are fifty or more going into how and why. But, ya know what? people set up chemical plants every day in America. Jewelers also routinely use mercury, figurine makers melt lead by the ton, and chip makers use solvents that would evaporate your eyeballs just from the fumes. Only a troll would think that anybody, let alone space activists needs to be informed by the likes of you that building rockets is risky business.
    Sorry, twit. Try again. Somewhere far from here.

    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  206. Re:No, I would not. It's too dangerous. by Oggust · · Score: 1
    The more energetic the redox reaction, the more energy you get from the same amount of fuel (higher specific impulse).

    Also, you ger faily small (light) combustion products, which also helps Isp.

    Even better than pure fluorine is the fabled super-oxidizer ClF5. It is more reactive than pure fluorine (since it's a liquid at sea level, more or less.), and much more dense, which means you need less tankage.

    It's so reactive that it pretty much can't be stored in anything for a longer period of time, and it's hypergolic with all firefighting agents commonly in use (including sand).

    It is very scary stuff, google for it to find some good stories.

    /August.

    --
    "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
  207. Re:powdered aluminum by Oggust · · Score: 1
    Aluminum is used in most hobbyist and commercial solid rocket fuels. Ammonium perchlorate, HTPB rubber, and a bit of fine aluminum.

    The aluminum normally gives you white smoke.

    /August.

    --
    "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
  208. Huh? by FireballFreddy · · Score: 1

    Somebody modded that flamebait? For Christ's sake, it's a joke. Sheesh. Do I really have to explain it to you? Obviously the AC didn't get it... Guess I'll have to cross my fingers and hope an intelligent soul out there meta-mods the schmuck.

    -FF

    --
    SQUEAK, the Death of Rats explained.
  209. Re:What kind? indeed by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
    some kinds of sex have absolutely nothing to do with motherhood.

    Barring things like The Imaculate Conception (one known case) and in-vitro fertilization (only slightly more common), no kinds of motherhood have nothing to do with sex.

    That having been said, any kind of (hetrosexual) sex can lead to motherood (for the mother, at least).

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  210. A Haiku for Mr. Stupid by KmartSecurity · · Score: 1

    hope you were joking
    No? You are a big douche bag,
    Give Euthanasia.