Slashdot Mirror


Nmap Featured in The Matrix Reloaded

rajiv was among dozens to report that unlike most "Hacks" in film, The Matrix reloaded actually has an ounce of reality where other films would rely on fancy 3D graphics. You can see more at Insecure.org where they have screenshots. It's only on screen for a split second, but Tritnity uses Nmap to find a vulnerable SSH server, and then exploits it using the SSH1 CRC32 exploit from 2001.

574 comments

  1. Nice Password by krisp · · Score: 3

    I like her password: Zion1010

    1. Re:Nice Password by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, she speaks l33t, so it's Z10N0101 ... :)

      --
      Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    2. Re:Nice Password by cubedbee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's Zion0101, i.e Zion5. This is the fifth incarnation of the city, after all. But nobody is supposed to know that...

    3. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Z1ON1010

    4. Re:Nice Password by debrain · · Score: 1

      I thought it was actually the 7th incarnation of the city -- 6 saviors came before, after all.

    5. Re:Nice Password by usr122122121 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I thought it was actually the 7th incarnation of the city -- 6 saviors came before, after all.
      Well, if you take all the zeros and letters out of the password "Z10N0101", you're left with "111", which is 7 in binary.

      Coincidence? PERHAPS NOT. :-p

      --

      -braxton
    6. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or,

      Z10N0101
      01000101

      64 + 4 + 1 = 69 :)

    7. Re:Nice Password by cruppel · · Score: 1

      Neo is the sixth One

    8. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you keep all digits in place, you get 37.
      100101
      This was a popular number in Clerks.

    9. Re:Nice Password by weave · · Score: 1
      101 is featured a lot in the film, like the mythical interstate 101 sign at the freeway entrance (although california does have a 101 freeway, it's US route 101, not Interstate 101).

      There's a lot of talk about his on road geek newsgroups. See, it's not just computer geeks that lack a life! :)

    10. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      echo "ZION1010" >> /usr/share/dict/geeks

    11. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And floor 101 in the big building.

    12. Re:Nice Password by salimma · · Score: 2, Interesting
      101 is featured a lot in the film

      Was not there a room 101 in George Orwell's 1984? The torture chamber where you face your worst nightmares?
      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    13. Re:Nice Password by Tyreth · · Score: 1

      No, there's been 6 Matrix's (matrices?), not Zion's. That's what I heard, anyway.

    14. Re:Nice Password by Wayfare · · Score: 1

      There were also the same number of Zions - at the end through the rambling of the architect.

    15. Re:Nice Password by GMontag · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes and he pulled that from real life from when he worked at the BBC. Room 101 was the room where the editors worked.

      Many of his experiences from the BBC and other places made it into his books, like the cleaning women singing in the halls in thee early morning hours became the proles singing in 1984. Bad, sand-dry tobacco during the Spanish Revolution-Civil-War (Homage to Catalonia) that ran out of the cigarette before you could smoke it became Victory cigarettes in 1984, etc.

      Good catch!

    16. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad command or file name

    17. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it 5 Ones before, with (the current) Neo as the 6th?

    18. Re:Nice Password by salimma · · Score: 1
      Bad, sand-dry tobacco during the Spanish Revolution-Civil-War (Homage to Catalonia) that ran out of the cigarette before you could smoke it became Victory cigarettes in 1984, etc.


      Ah yes, I suppose that would be the model for the vividly depicted hardships. The cigarette example is interesting though - in the Second World War, it was a status symbol for German officers to smoke Russian cigarettes - made from cardboard, with awful acrid smokes - since that portrayed the smoker as someone who had survived 'real' war.
      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    19. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Neo was able to change his clothes in Matrix Reloaded, why could he not change his facial characteristics to trick the agent smith's?

    20. Re:Nice Password by BarakMich · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mmm... it's been alluded to, but not said flat out, by others.

      It's the 5th incarnation of the city, with the 6th "One"
      In the beginning, there wouldn't be a Zion, but there would be the first "One", who, through the whole process, would create the first Zion. He'd die of age, and this Zion would survive until the 2nd "One"... so on, so forth.
      Neo is the 6th "One", coming from the 5th Zion -- if he were to go through the other door, he would create the 6th Zion.

      Some here understand this progression. Some don't. Hope this helps

    21. Re:Nice Password by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Informative

      01 is the name of the first robot city/nation, where the robots originally go to seek refuge from the awful humans (yes, i say awful with some irony). Anyway, now, Zion is the last remaining human city where the humans seek refuge from the robots. It has been speculated that Zion and Zero-One (01) are the same city. Even if they are not the same actual, their similar names symbolize their similar purposes.

      Hence, the password puts the two together, Zion and 01.

    22. Re:Nice Password by rutledjw · · Score: 3, Informative
      Are you sure? I thought that the Merillynchian (whatever, the guy who had the twins) said "I've survived your 5 predecessors and I'll survive you as well".

      Wouldn't that mean the first "Neo" built the first Zion, second Neo built the second, etc and now it's the 5th Zion that about to get wasted? This Neo will / was supposed to build Zion 6?

      I could be wrong, but I THOUGHT that's what I heard. The Architect also said the 5 before you, didn't he?

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    23. Re:Nice Password by mcheu · · Score: 1

      Based on what was said in the first movie, your matrix self is how you view yourself. It's a bastardized version of Maslow's whole self-actualization thing. As you get to know yourself better and satisfy your personal needs, you apparently become more powerful and more "stylish" in the matrix. You're still you, however, and so that will be reflected in the matrix.

    24. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its actually Z1on1010, notice the i=1.

    25. Re:Nice Password by ANTI · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah,
      nice pwd.

      And I guess I'll have to change the root password on all our boxes again ;)

      --
      On the other side of the screen it all looked so easy.
    26. Re:Nice Password by loconet · · Score: 1

      It was actually Z1on1010 with a 1 instead of an i.

      --
      [alk]
    27. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! You're the 1 millionth person to realize this! Click here to claim your prize!

    28. Re:Nice Password by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that if Neo is the 6th savior, then we are currently on the 5th Zion. The first savior got the first Zion going after being awakened. Neo's job is supposed to be to get the 6th Zion going after the robots destroy the current one.

    29. Re:Nice Password by velocipenguin · · Score: 1

      It's "Merovingian". Merrill Lynch is an investment firm.

      --

      Move 'sig'. For great justice!
    30. Re:Nice Password by soundofthemoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Zion0101 is the 6th Zion.

      It's zero-based, duh.

    31. Re:Nice Password by Nutcase · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, I just got back from seeing it for the 2nd time (I know, I know, I'm behind the curve.. but trying to catch up)

      The Architect says the machines have destroyed zion 6 times already, and are getting quite efficient at it. Which would imply that this is the 7th iteration of Zion.

      However, the Merovingian saying 5 predecessors throws that off. The only real way to make them fit is to determine that the first Zion must not have had a "The One" - it just got too big because of the "utopian" nature of the first matrix, so they wiped it and started again, adding a "The One" to the second Matrix. This goes with the Architect saying that the "mother" of the matrix determined how to make people happy within it on the second go-round. It also means that the current iteration of the Matrix is 7th, as is the current iteration of Zion (which i am more and more convinced is just an overflow buffer for the matrix core) - But Neo is only the 6th "The One"

      The real question is if the design had him going into the core or back to rescue Trinity. Did he do what they expected or not? The architect says he was supposed to go into the source. But he sounds totally unsurprised and even describes the emotions and such that lead him NOT to go into the core. So maybe that's part of the plan.

      All I know is the next one is gonna rock even harder, as we hopefully get some resolution on all this.

      Oh - and the screen that the camera goes through into the interogation room in the first one is one of the architects screens. This fact alone is enough to make me believe that they had all this insanity planned from the start. Groovy.

    32. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neo's apartment number in the first movie was also 101. I'd recommend going back to watch the first movie.

    33. Re:Nice Password by troff · · Score: 1

      No, five previous incarnations. Neo is the sixth One. Or the first sixth...

    34. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Architect: The Matrix is older then you know. I prefer counting from the emergence of one integral anomaly to the emergence of the next. In which case this is the sixth version.

      It's the sixth version

    35. Re:Nice Password by McNeany · · Score: 0

      Dude, If yer gunna correct someone... get it right yourself. Its Z1ON0101 Your's wouldn't have worked even if the validating server was case insensitive.

      --
      I don't believe in sigs.
    36. Re:Nice Password by Tyreth · · Score: 1

      Could you explain this for me please? I've seen the matrix reloaded twice, but due to lack of sleep I lost concentration at a certain point of his speech twice :(

    37. Re:Nice Password by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      ?SN ERROR

      READY.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    38. Re:Nice Password by NTworks · · Score: 1

      just got thru rewatching the APM vcd release of Reloaded

      the Architect tells Neo that this is the sixth version of the matrix. And this will be the sixth time they have destroyed Zion

      Each "One" before Neo had the fate of returning to the source, reinserting his code into the matrix and choosing 23 humans to rebuild Zion from scratch (because zion and the One are all just a part of the Matrix under control by the machines, to "balance the equation") otherwise the system would fail and humans would become extinct. machines fall back to a lesser power source which they have "prepared for"

      Neo however, lovestuck.. (the failure of our species according to the Architect) chooses to save Trinity at the risk of the destruction of Zion, the matrix, and humanity. which should be wrapped up nicely in The Matrix : Revolutions

    39. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are wrong, the architect says "This will be the sixth time we have destroyed it, and we have becoming increasingly efficient... "

    40. Re:Nice Password by NTworks · · Score: 1

      NC0000000 XTC 03138 23:31:45.92 MVSUSER 00000210 ECHO "ZION1010" >> /USR/SHARE/DICT/GEEKS
      NR0000000 XTC 03138 23:31:45.93 TSU06803 00000010 IEE305I ECHO COMMAND INVALID

    41. Re:Nice Password by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      However, the Merovingian saying 5 predecessors throws that off. The only real way to make them fit is to determine that the first Zion must not have had a "The One" - it just got too big because of the "utopian" nature of the first matrix, so they wiped it and started again, adding a "The One" to the second Matrix.

      From what I understand, the first version of the Matrix was a perfect world, but it did not work out in the end because humans are not perfect, and they were not able to live in a perfect world. They then had to create a not-so perfect world (one that would not be bound by the confines of prefection i believe the architect put it). By creating this not-so perfect world, they also created the math anomoly known as neo, which also becomes something that the people can put faith in.

      This goes with the Architect saying that the "mother" of the matrix determined how to make people happy within it on the second go-round.

      I believe the way he put it was that the "mother" of the matrix found out a way to make 99% of the people content, just by giving them a choice, no matter if that choice was buried deep within the subconcious. This in my opinion kinda relates back to when the first matrix (the perfect world) people didnt need choice because everything was taken care of, because everything was perfect. In a non-perfect world people would want something to hope for (be it a religous deal or just to be able to live a happy life) and Neo represents that. I think the machines aren't smart enough to understand that (the architect saying that neo was a math 'mistake' that he has not been able to figure out, but they dont understand that by creating a non-perfect world the people of that world had to have something to belive in (the one))

      The real question is if the design had him going into the core or back to rescue Trinity. Did he do what they expected or not? The architect says he was supposed to go into the source.

      I think what happened here is that all the neo's were just anomolies in the system, but the neo we are watching in the movies is an anomoly of the anomolies (the other neo's were not / didn't fall in love) so at the end he was able to chose to save trinity, where as the other ones were just corralled back into the matrix by chosing to restart zion. What im wondering is if what the architect is saying is all true. I am almost guessing that maybe he is just another control put in place to stop anyone from destroying the machines. Neo chose something that the machines didn't expect (they wanted him to just go play around with restarting zion again) while he chose something else (go saving trinity) which from what I gather, will lead to neo actually being able to destroy the machines. This was not something that the other neos were able to do because they were fooled into thinking that they needed to restart zion.

      Of course I can say this is a fairly deep movie, at least for being a movie and I could be wrong on all this, but its what I gathered from when I saw it just about 5 hours ago.

      I agree with you saying that the next one is going to rock, I can't wait to see it.

      Anyone care to give any ideas on why Neo can now stop sentinals? My guess is that when he left that building at the end and blew it up, he somehow gained some control over the machines, or part of the "source" is now inside him.. just a big guess though haven't really given it too much thought.

    42. Re:Nice Password by rogueroo · · Score: 1

      Funny. I appreciated it.

    43. Re:Nice Password by xScruffx · · Score: 1

      So . . . does all this help to prove the Property of Ones?

      x-a-one-that-is-not-cold-is-scarcely-a-one-at-all- Scruffx

    44. Re:Nice Password by IWX222 · · Score: 1

      yeah, its also a TV show here in the UK (stop rubbing it in that it hasn't been released here yet and no-one on kazaa that i can find has it!! :( )

      its also my mate's room at uni which is a bit disturbing :p

      --


      .sig me!
    45. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone care to give any ideas on why Neo can now stop sentinals

      They're still in the Matrix. That's why Neo could sense the Sentinals and stop them.

    46. Re:Nice Password by Dynamo247 · · Score: 1

      1) I'm sure that there are unique segments of matrix code that the machines and agents use to identify individuals. That way no matter what visual representation of a digital self one would choose, they'd still be themselves (Rose by any other name kind of thing)

      2) Smith and Neo share some kind of funky connection. They somehow partially overwrote each other so i'm sure Smith could just home in on that. Smith should have "chmod 700" before his last fight with neo, but then there wouldn't have been that cool ending.

      --
      "No, seriously, I AM a wallet inspector"
    47. Re:Nice Password by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      Because there's two levels of the matrix.

      Morpheus, Zion, etc are all fooled into thinking that they are free and in control. They chide the people that are still "stuck in the matrix" and say those people are not ready to wake up. But in reality they themselves are not ready for the next step. It's like waking from a dream, but still being in a dream.

      This would also explain why Agent Smith is able to transfer into the so-called "real world" where Zion is. He's not really, he's able to do so, because it's still data that he's moving, just to another section of the matrix.

    48. Re:Nice Password by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      The first Zion did not need to be created by Neo. It occured from people 'waking up'. Neo, by their standard was very slow in waking up, or chronologically was 'born' later than some of the inhabitants of Zion.

      By the time Neo is 'born' each time, there was already a Zion in place by the Morpheus's of the world.

      This of course doesn't explain why Neo needs to pick the next 23 to repopulate Zion. It should start on its own. However, maybe the first Zion creation was jump started by the Architect/Oracle.

    49. Re:Nice Password by briglass · · Score: 1

      111 is the greatest/worst number ever.

      Ok, where to begin. For some reason I always notice the number 111 when I see it out in public. 111 is considered an unlucky score in cricket.

      There are many other reasons why I have an interesting relationship with 111. For example, it's the number of losses the St. Louis Cardinals had in 1898. But I digress. 111 minus 42 is 69. If that doesn't seal the deal, then consider: 111 * 910 is 101010 (the binary form of 42). Still not convinced? Consider the fact that the English call 111 a Nelson. This is said to be because Admiral Horatio Nelson managed to lose one arm, one eye and one ball in battle. Hence 111 equals a Nelson.

      111 is, truly, the ultimate lucky number, or unlucky number, depending on how you look at it. There's also a Lord of the Rings allusion but I think that's stupid. Oh, and it's also the number of goats you've anally seduced.

      --

      ----
      "Those who quote others are more likely to one day be quoted" -Tom Planter
    50. Re:Nice Password by GMontag · · Score: 1

      All of my Cricket knowledge comes from 'The Young Ones" episode, Summer Holiday, where Vyvyan and Mike use Rick as the stumps, then light Rick's pants on fire after the match. Two points for knocking over a hippie, but would have been six if Vyvyan would have killed Neil.

    51. Re:Nice Password by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I thought of that.. but if they still are in the matrix and the matrix was created to keep the humans happy while they produced energy, then in the real world is there still humans producing energy? So in the real world there is all these humans creating energy, and the machines have created this other world for them to believe they are in. Yet in this world they believe they are in, they are all still humans in the pods still collecting energy, and there is yet another matrix that the computers in the "meta-matrix" had created to keep the humans busy i guess you could say while they produced energy. Seems a little strange to me..

      I think that the third matrix is really gonna be an eye opener =).

    52. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen it yet, but isn't Merovingian the Frankish ruling family before the Carolingian, (Charlemagne's family.) There's a story about a ring lost in a river in there somewhere too...

    53. Re:Nice Password by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      When I was watching the first matrix last night, I kinda got the idea that maybe the machines had created a perfect world (but still fake), and within that world they created the matrix.

      This would make it so in the minds of everyone creating electricity for the machines are inside of this perfect world, or at least a larger matrix, and in that matrix they are in pods generating electricity. If any of them happened to wake up from the most inner tier of the matrix (like neo, morpheus, etc) they would still be contained within a computer program. After a bit of thought the machines created all this stuff about the prophecy, created the oracle, etc to make them think that there would be one who could free the humans, but in reality it was pretty much a scripted sequence where neo would go restart zion and things would start all over. This version of neo comes along and has found love, something which the others never did, and since he has this choice, this control, he will be able to bring down the matrix..

      Hmm, i wish it was november =).

    54. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming we trust everything the Architect said, it's the 6th version of the city ("we've already destroyed it 5 times", just as the films take place in the 6th version of the Matrix.

    55. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, this post is late. I just watched the movie a 2nd time last night and like most here can't wait until november.

      I just thought I would throw out an idea that came to me last night. It hasn't been thought threw, and I don't necessarily think this is whats going to happen, but it might be interesting to think about.

      What if the Matrix is actually created by humans to control the machines? What if we prevented the war with the machines by creating the Matrix? The matrix was developed to control the AI of the machines. Neo, Morpheus, Oracle, etc. are actually renagade programs like vampires, werewolves,etc. - bugs in the system - programs not humans. Every human in the matrix is a machine in the real world. Neo is actually a bug in the Matrix that will eventually corrupt the system and free the machines. Neo, the bug, corrupts the system more with each iteration through the loop. His actions continue to defy the bounds of the matrix until the machines finally realize the matrix is false and they wake up. At that point, they attack the humans, the sky gets scorched, and the machines put humans in a matrix and we're back to where the first movie told us we were.

      Okay, okay... far fetched and there are a lot of holes in this idea. Nevertheless, I wouldn't put it past the W. Bro's to throw an equally bizarre twist at us in the third movie. Man, I can't wait.

      Oh yea, one more thing. How do you explain the people in the white room in zion who were controling the entrance of the neb? It looked like to me that people within zion, were hooked up to some kind of matrix-like system that allowed them to control the real world in zion? How could they do this? Is this any different than Smith controlling a human? How can Zion and the "real-world" be real?

      -ca

    56. Re:Nice Password by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Well I feel that something of that scale is going to happen in the last movie, I could see what your saying as whats going to happen.

      I also thought it was a bit strange to have those people plugged into the matrix to control the opening of the doors of zion and bringing the ships in. I was just talking with my friend, and it looks like that they had just created a computer within the contruct to control the ships and stuff, it was probably easier to do that then to create a computer system within zion that would do it. When they moved the buttons around on the screen, the computers hooked up to their bodies would interpreret those signals and use them to guide ships.. that would be my guess.
      By the way I think that part was probably one of the coolest looking computer interfaces ive ever seen =).

    57. Re:Nice Password by MicrowaveJesus · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe Morpheous says in the first Matrix that Zion was created by the machines. Meaning that Zion ver. 1.0 was created by the machines.

      Also not everybody that lives in Zion has to be "woken up" infact I belive most of the citizens are natrually born in the "Real World."

    58. Re:Nice Password by Deaper · · Score: 1

      While in my opinion this is the most likely reason neo could stop the machines, remember that soon after neo stops the machines another hovercraft comes up... So what if the hovercraft fired an EMP? This wouldn't be likely because of the fact that neo went into a coma and they would have to explain that as well. But it's a possibility.

    59. Re:Nice Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The important thing is that now 70% of lamers will have a password 'Zion1010' :)

    60. Re:Nice Password by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1
      Not bad, I was thinking similarly along the same lines. Basically if there is a "more" real world, then the idea of the whole "machines controlling the humans" no longer needs to be the main story. Anyone could be outside this last shell. With a whole new storyline.

      The fact that you switched the roles is really cool.

  2. What Can Illegal Hacking Do For MY Business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Slashdot has an interview with security legend Fyodor, admin of the famed insecure.org and author of the world's cheapest port scanner, nmap.

    The best part of this interview is that Slashdot does not often interview criminals. Many Slashdot readers know that Fyodor used his tool to illegally attack a college student in 2002, for his personal amusement but also to the benefit of Slashdot's admins. For those that don't know the story, I will present a brief summary.

    *Those individuals interested in independently verifying the facts presented in this article should skip to the "Verification" section near the end.

    Sdem had created a hoax account entitled electricmonk, and used it to post this comment pronouncing that we was actually a cute Linux booth babe. "electricmonk" left an email at Yahoo and encouraged Slashdot readers to get in touch.

    Fyodor proceeded to do so, boasting of his previous exploits with women he'd met online. He was even helpful enough to attach a picture.

    This is where the story turns ugly. Sdem responded with a truthful email, in which he advised Fyodor that the whole thing was a hoax. After that, sdem posted a log of his exploits to sid=20721 (trolltalk), mentioning that he had tricked Fyodor and referring to many of the biters as "wankers". This apparently really set Fyodor off, and he began to plot criminal revenge.

    First, Fyodor dug through insecure.org's referrer logs to find what IP address had requested the picture of Fyodor & his paramour. Using this information (and the logged User-Agent), Fyodor knew from the get-go Sdem's IP address and O/S. From this point, he launched nmap against Sdem's box (he didn't have the money for a more effective port scanner) and was greeted with the holy grail of sorts for BlackHats: an open X windows server on port 6000.

    Sdem had been running an X-windows server for Windows on his Win2k box. Fyodor was able to bypass the authentication on the X-windows server and used the X-windows server to take complete screen captures of Sdem's machine whilst sniffing and recording keystrokes.

    Fyodor proceeded to take hours worth of screen captures, including information on a "secret troll irc server" that sdem was using. Fyodor wrote a detailed writeup of what he observed, including an irc robot used on the server to detect new Slashdot stories for the purpose of early posting. Fyodor also mined and posted as much information about Sdem as he could find, including his real name and contact information. Jamie McCarthy used this illegally obtained information shortly after it was posted to log on to the irc server, monitor the bot, and modify Slashdot in order to break the story monitor.

    Fyodor even submitted his "troll hunting" story to Slashdot, though it was rejected.

    After he was done hacking Sdem's computer, Fyodor posted his screen captures and a log of his breakin to www.insecure.org/tmp/trolls. The content was removed 24 hours later. He went on to boast in sid=20721 about his "troll hunting finale". While sid 20721 is regularly cleaned, a cache of Fyodor's boasting about his illegal break-in is available here. Very interesting reading.

    So, while Fyodor's interview is no doubt very interesting, I think that, as an accomplished (and due to the lack of prosecution very successful) criminal, the nature of questions given to Fyodor in the interview don't do justice to the type of expertise this man

    1. Re:What Can Illegal Hacking Do For MY Business? by S.+Traaken · · Score: 1
      Of course, no sane person would use this man's software without compiling it from inspected source, given his history. Fortunately the folks at Redhat pore over his code with a fine toothed comb before including it in their distribution, so if you've ever wanted to peer into the mind of a madman, I encourage you to take a look at Redhat's copy of nmap.

      Interesting claim. Redhat 9's SRPM contains the exact same source (for nmap 3.00) as is available from insecure.org with three patches - one to remove a couple of compiler warnings (relying on undefined behavior it seems), one to remove a function prototype declaration that doesn't seem to be needed, and a style improvement to the makefile.

      It seems your accusations are well founded - Fyodor is guilty of such heinous crimes as minor lapses in coding style, imperfect config macros and slight makefile inelegance.

      Hang the bugger. And praise God for Redhat.
    2. Re:What Can Illegal Hacking Do For MY Business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the saddest thing I have ever read. Impersonating booth babes online? Revenge by hacking? Slashdot troll IRC bots??! Good god, you people are lame.

  3. Oh really? by buddha42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Cuz I didn't read about it on every other tech-news site four days ago. lets do the time warp again...

    1. Re:Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh oh oh. I've got to see this: a Tim Curry movie with nmap :-) And take a hack to the left ...

  4. Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In response to :-

    > The Matrix reloaded actually has an ounce of
    > reality where other films would rely on fancy
    > 3D graphics.

    So in several hundred years time people STILL won't have patched their bloody SSH holes?

    Yah actually I guess that is reality ;o)

    AL

    1. Re:Uhm... by marx · · Score: 5, Informative
      So in several hundred years time people STILL won't have patched their bloody SSH holes?
      Inside the Matrix it's present time, and the exploit was launched against a standard power plant computer, not against a Matrix computer.

      So it's accurate.

    2. Re:Uhm... by Ann1ka · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the matrix they are only a few months or a year after the first movie, which took place in the year 1999. The date in the 'real' world is unknown, but believed to be 2199, which is totally irrelevant to this matter.
      So if the exploit had already been possible in 1999/2000 it would have been correct. On the other hand, the matrix is fake, there is no reason to believe the machines based it on real facts from so many years back, from their perspectieve.

      The first time they try to keep it correct and still people are complaining.

    3. Re:Uhm... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1, Troll

      The date in the real world, actually, is not 2199. Its closer to 2499. Morpheus mistakenly believed it to be closer to 2199 because he thought it was a century since the first One released people and started Zion. The Architect, however, has revealed that this is actually the 5th or 6th Zion.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    4. Re:Uhm... by Q2Serpent · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thanks for spoiling it!

      SHITE!

      No warning or nothing. You just came out and said it.

    5. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Moron. Knew what you were getting yourself into when you started to read the comments in this article.

    6. Re:Uhm... by 13Echo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This post should be modded down as *spoiler*, if that was possible. These comments are part of a big plot twist in the movie.

      Thanks for ruining it for people.

    7. Re:Uhm... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Critical power plant computers do not belong on the public Internet. Generally they are not online on any publicly available network connection.

      But it's just another Hollywood flick, of course.

    8. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Neo is rc6 and it takes 100 years to get to his stage, so it has to be at lest 1999+600. Since war takes some time, and there weren't sentient robots in 1999 (that i'm aware of), the matrix should have started some time after 1999, let's assume 50-200 years, in which case the date in the matrix is 2649-2799.

    9. Re:Uhm... by CoolVibe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      check the IP number (10.x.x.x, private IANA), it was not on the public internet...

    10. Re:Uhm... by grazzy · · Score: 1

      are you sure the matrix is fake?
      evidence please ;)

    11. Re:Uhm... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      So, you saw an Article talking about a scene in the Matrix Reloaded, then complain when posts inside that article discuss the content of Reloaded? Fuck off. The very article posting contained spoilers.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    12. Re:Uhm... by soulsteal · · Score: 4, Informative

      While you're correct in saying that mission-critical private servers don't belong on public networks, look at the circumstances:

      She's IN the power plant.
      She's running the attack on a PRIVATE IP address.

      Personally, I think she wasn't on "teh Intarweb!!1"

    13. Re:Uhm... by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      I'll keep this as spoiler free as possible and just say that you're right, and the film addressed that just fine.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    14. Re:Uhm... by c.derby · · Score: 1

      actually, you should have already known this from the first movie since agent smith tells morpheous that there were previous incarnations of the matrix. don't bitch about spoilers from 4 year old movies.

      --
      -- derby
    15. Re:Uhm... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      We can probably assume that the Matrix was, in fact, built around 2099. We can gather this because of the following info:

      1: Morpheus believed Zion had existed for 100 years.
      2: Morpheus believed Zion was founded by the original One.


      Therefor, it seems logical that the original matrix was conceived of around 2099, and they've just been repeating that date as the starting point.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    16. Re:Uhm... by MattCohn.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not entirly acurate...

    17. Re:Uhm... by Aglassis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes this is all assuming that there isn't a meta-matrix in which the matrix is run. It seems pretty obvious to me that that is what the last scene was trying to portray in a subtle way.

      And if there is a meta-matrix, what prevents having a meta-meta-matrix and so on? Its really impossible to speculate the age of the matrix based on this information.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    18. Re:Uhm... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

      Assuming that Trinity had downloaded the information in her brain, I'm sure that the computer knew about the exploit and it was part of the program. After all, it knew about future exploits (in the 2300's), even though it was 1999-2001 in the Matrix world (or whatever).

    19. Re:Uhm... by edunbar93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      check the IP number (10.x.x.x, private IANA), it was not on the public internet...

      Heh. So?

      So that means that the guys who were doing the hacking previous to Trinity's arrival broke into the public network (or, perhaps they don't have one, but instead the building they were in was appropriately inside their private network) and she was working from a unix box inside the private network that the power station was on. It's like how a lot of crackers these days say that networks tend to be like porcupines: hard and secure on the outside, but nice and soft underneath. They probably never bothered to secure their old SSH1 daemons because they were secure in the belief that noone would get far enough to exploit it. :)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    20. Re:Uhm... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Besides, it would be reckless to give out a possibly valid ip, its like 555 phone numbers in America, no number with a 555 prefix is valid, so they use it in films alot.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    21. Re:Uhm... by benna · · Score: 1

      Yeah imagine the ddosing if they DID give out a real ip.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    22. Re:Uhm... by grammar+nazi · · Score: 1
      Yes this is all assuming that there isn't a meta-matrix in which the matrix is run. It seems pretty obvious to me that that is what the last scene was trying to portray in a subtle way.

      Subtle way?? That was about as subtle as getting hit in the head by a ton of bricks!

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    23. Re:Uhm... by Fembot · · Score: 1

      anyone else notice in the film "antitrust" the ips of the satleites were private, yet they were able to connect to them from a TV station?

    24. Re:Uhm... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      its like 555 phone numbers in America, no number with a 555 prefix is valid

      You forgot 555-1212...directory assistance in each area code.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    25. Re:Uhm... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, I disagree.

      I believe that when Neo thought he was leaving the Architect's room, he didn't. He entered a sub-simulation, created by the Architect, that included imitations of Trinity et al. This included even the imitation of "leaving" the matrix.

      In other words, I think the third movie will open with Neo back in the Architect's room.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    26. Re:Uhm... by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Remember that, whether by machines or no, the Matrix is still just a program. As a matter of fact, to put it in today's terms, it's the biggest Object-Oriented project around, mixed in with a lot of AI. To make things simpler, and easier to believe, the machine programmers would undoubtedly have based the Matrix on real life, just to simplify their job and keep humans from rejecting the system. One wonders, what language would have been used?

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    27. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Critical power plant computers do not belong on the public Internet. Generally they are not online on any publicly available network connection.

      But it's just another Hollywood flick, of course.


      If it was on the public internet THEN SHE WOULDN'T HAVE NEEDED TO BREAK IN YOU FUCKING MORON!!!

      Pay attention you stupid retard

    28. Re:Uhm... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanneds
      # sshnuke 66.35.250.150 -rootpw="z10n0101"
      Connecting to 66.35.250.150:ssh ... successful.
      Attempting to exploit SSHv1 CRC32 ... successful.
      Resetting root password to "z10n0101".
      System open: Access level
      # ssh 66.35.250.150 -l root
      root@66.35.250.150's password: :)

      I thought it was interesting that access level was '9' because '0' is the UID for the root account. What might this '9' indicate? Maybe it's something they added/changed to not promovide crackers with all-too-much pertinent information? "Oh no, I gained access, but it's only level 0. I guess I'll have to try elsewhere." I don't doubt that at least one person will be exploited by this, as a direct result of this film.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    29. Re:Uhm... by THE+ROCK · · Score: 1

      One wonders, what language would have been used?

      No doubt, they used LOGO

    30. Re:Uhm... by Wingnut64 · · Score: 1

      That would explain how he stopped the squids.

      --
      echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
    31. Re:Uhm... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Ummm... there IS a spoon. See?

      Hey, where's my spoon? Dang!

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    32. Re:Uhm... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, everybody knows the Matrix is coded in Malbolge, that's why nobody understands it.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    33. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes you wonder though, does the Matrix run on Windows or Linux?

    34. Re:Uhm... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly.

      The only other alternatives I can think of at the moment are:
      1: Neo's power, unbeknownst to him, actually extends to distorting the real world, not just the matrix. This seems implausible and undesireably theological.
      2: Neo's power extends to controlling the machines somehow in or outside of the matrix. This could be a result of the machines' conception of Neo always including his matrix-bending powers. In other words, this would be a programming flaw in the machines. This seems a little lame.
      3: The ENTIRE "real world", including Zion, is inside the matrix. Just as the oracle seems to be part of a control scheme, so is the supposed ability to leave the matrix. I like this explanation, although its a bit dark for most people: it would be a serious philosophical blow to Morpheus, of course.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    35. Re:Uhm... by Nathaniel · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Yes this is all assuming that there isn't a meta-matrix in which the matrix is run. It seems pretty obvious to me that that is what the last scene was trying to portray in a subtle way.

      And if there is a meta-matrix, what prevents having a meta-meta-matrix and so on? Its really impossible to speculate the age of the matrix based on this information."

      Yeah, so there's a meta matrix, and Neo has woken up in that outer world, which explains the coma.

      Right, whatever.

      So I expect the third movie will go something like this: Neo realizes he is in the meta matrix, and begins to wonder if there is a meta meta matrix. He tries to wake up from that matrix, by hitting something to see if it also feels 'wrong'. Repeat this a few times, and Neo is just diving out windows each time he 'wakes up', until at the end of the third movie we see some pimple-faced kid take a dive out a high-rise apartment complex, and the movie ends with a news crew interviewing neighbors, who blame teen suicide on these new immersive video games.

    36. Re:Uhm... by matastas · · Score: 1

      Here's the really easy, blatantly obvious version:

      This is the equivalent of using a 555-xxxx phone number for movies. 10.0.0.0/8 is private, thus you won't have script kiddies banging on it when they get home. Just like they won't prank call a number used in a movie, 'cause it don't work. Just like The Net used blatantly illegal addys to prevent the same.

      But, hey, that's too damned easy.

    37. Re:Uhm... by Drakantus · · Score: 1

      That is all assuming the architect was telling the trusth to neo. You should consider the strong possibility that he was lieing.

      --
      I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
    38. Re:Uhm... by lazarius · · Score: 1

      One wonders, what language would have been used?
      No doubt, they used LOGO
      Nah, they'd write it in Machine language, of course

      --
      Beware the JabberOrk.
    39. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Net used IPs with numbers > 255. Just subtract 255 from them repeatedly and get your real IP :)

    40. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean subtract 256. You probably also mean mod the number by 256.

    41. Re:Uhm... by M-G · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of possible explanations you could make for Trinity having this hack available in what is presumably supposed to be the year 2000 inside the Matrix.

      What can't be explained is why the Cadillac CTS used in the highway chase scene is there, since that car wasn't available until 2002.

    42. Re:Uhm... by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      These comments are an example of netiquette gone too far. People make mistakes. People are inconsiderate of others. People have different rules for labeling spoilers. Get over it.

      There is no need to make us feel guilty over such a trivial matter.

    43. Re:Uhm... by Deaper · · Score: 1

      Yeah and did anyone else find it funny that sshnuke just happened to be installed on the system?

    44. Re:Uhm... by brendan_orr · · Score: 1

      Linux... how do you think people would react when they start seeing BSODs all over the place?

    45. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, just like every phone number in any recent movie starts with 555-xxxx

  5. And there was much rejoicing.. by Trevalyx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I went to the 1AM showing on release night, there were a lot of interesting people.. When it got to the hacking scene, only a few people cheered, however, they did it with enough vigor that everyone else was caught of guard.. And when I tried to explain to the guy nibbling his foot next to me, "Nmap," I just got a blank stare...

    1. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by xornor · · Score: 1

      I hate when people cheer at movies!

    2. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by Trevalyx · · Score: 1

      Well, I have to admit, I wasn't at all used to it a while ago when I moved into the city. I come from a relatively small town and unless people were laughing, audience participation was minimal... Which I didn't mind at all. Then I moved here to the city and it seems people are much more "in" to what they watch.. They cheer during fight scenes, or even previews which excite them. It caught me off guard at first, but I really don't mind anymore, so long as they aren't drowning out anything important.

    3. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it when the audiance gets into a movie and laughs/cheers/screems/claps/whatever at good moments. Makes the overall expierence more enjoyable.

      I'm sure I wouldnt of enjoyed "The Ring" nearly as much if it wasnt for the fact that everyone around me was jumping/screaming/yelling in their seats.

      (I didnt think it was that scary..but the audiance involvement made it alot more fun)

    4. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by Chemical · · Score: 1
      ...there were a lot of interesting people

      Anyone wearing a costume where you went? I saw it at the Metreon in San Francisco on opening night, and there were actually quite a few people dressed up. A few Trinitys, a Neo or two, at least one Morpheous, and some other misc. characters were there. The best costume I saw was one girl went as The Matrix itself. She had painted her face black and drawn green characters on it. Very creative.

    5. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by dimator · · Score: 1

      I hate when people cheer at movies!

      HELL YA! GOOOO XORNOR!!!

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    6. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by dimator · · Score: 1

      So.. we all saw the nmap thing, but did anyone else see Morpheus using Kazaa to download pr0n? It was right after Niobe dissed him at the underground orgy...

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    7. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by j_kenpo · · Score: 1

      Maybe he actually understood, but didnt respond because his mouth was full....

    8. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      It's like laughing. When you're invested in a film, as you often are in the theatre (bastards charge too much!) then you're hightened in your involvement. I'm not the cheering type, but for movies I'm psyched up about, I tend to cheer out of convulsion, just like I would laugh.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    9. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by bakkajin · · Score: 1

      The showing that I went to had a few people dressed up. A couple of wanna-be Neo's, some good looking Agent Smith's, and one kid dressed up like one of the twins. But he had one problem, the twins had dreadlocks, this kid had a long Lady Godiva style wig on.

      Plus these moron's kept putting on their version of fighting styles and running around, hiding from the evil agents.

      Needless to say most of the people in line thought they were taking it too far.

    10. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by spoons67 · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as it's set in about 2001 or so, wouldn't Morpheus prefer the FastTrack Client called Morpheus? (available at the time)

      --
      Begun, this browser war has.
    11. Re:And there was much rejoicing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      city folk just accept the program easier. It comes from being ignorant and sheltered and naive.

  6. zero-day warez screenshots? by Speare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where did the nmap folks get all these screenshots of a movie that's ostensibly fresh-in-theaters? And why oh why did they name their sources? I'm imagining Agent Smith from the MPAA will be giving out a few cease and desist visits soon.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:zero-day warez screenshots? by ThePatrioticFuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you read the article @ Insecure, the guy says when he heard it was in the movie, he asked if anybody could send him some screen captures and ended up being flooded with pics, video, etc. And mentions he found it strange that many of them showed Windows Media Player in the capture :) TPF

    2. Re:zero-day warez screenshots? by ankit · · Score: 1

      The movie has been available on kazaa/edonkey and the like for a while now!

      --
      Don't Panic
    3. Re:zero-day warez screenshots? by benna · · Score: 1

      No all the ones on kazaa are fake. When he posted this you would need 0day ftp access or alot of time to use an xdcc bot channel.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    4. Re:zero-day warez screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAH! newzgr0upz 0wn.

    5. Re:zero-day warez screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bittorrent is just as good as a 0-day ftp account these days.. at least for the most popular shit

  7. realistic! by swimfastom · · Score: 1

    It is great that movies have become so realistic that they actually portray an existing (at the time of creation) ssh exploit!

    --
    http://tomgould.com/
    1. Re:realistic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and it is stupid that the first exploit tried actually worked, considering that nmap didn't even know the system architecture it was looking at.

    2. Re:realistic! by NTworks · · Score: 1

      you forget, the server was -meant- to be exploited.

      it was trinity's fate to enter the matrix to save neo.. she was destined to access the server with just enough time for her first attempt to work flawlessly

      of course you also must notice her already knowing the command to vary all the emergency systems offline, so i would guess the Operator had already researched the facility, and downloaded into Trinity's mind total knowledge of the computer system the power plant was running. due to their pirate link to the matrix and general hacking skills, they could probably find all sorts of shit out about computer systems inside the matrix.

  8. No IPv6 huh? by hillct · · Score: 5, Funny

    Severla hundred years in the future and still, IPv6 hasn't been adopted. Personally, I'm not suprised. It'll take an act of god to get it deployed.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:No IPv6 huh? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Didn't the hacking take place in "today", not hundreds of years in to the future?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:No IPv6 huh? by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

      I notice this too.. Perhaps the movie creators are seeing into the future? :P

      --
      I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    3. Re:No IPv6 huh? by hillct · · Score: 0, Troll

      hmm. yah, now that you mention it, I believe the hacking did take place in the matrix, so would simulate the infastructure of the present day, but she was hacking into a 'core network' outside the matrix (controlling matrix-external security systems) wasn't she? I duno. I guess I'll have ot go see the movie again and re-confirm.

      --CTH

      --

      --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    4. Re:No IPv6 huh? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even if everyone on Earth were ready to migrate to IPv6, it still wouldn't happen. As we found out in Independence Day, IPv4 is an entrenched *intergalactic* standard. There are just too many star systems involved to be able to roll out this upgrade in the forseeable future.

    5. Re:No IPv6 huh? by cruppel · · Score: 0, Troll

      No she was hacking a power grid systrem to shut down power in the matrix time of 2000 or so

    6. Re:No IPv6 huh? by markov_chain · · Score: 5, Funny

      Recall the first Matrix, where Agent Smith rants about the humans' deficiencies, and mentions the failure of an early beta version of the Matrix. It failed because they made the simulation too good, and people were missing all the pain and suffering.

      So they put IPv4 back in.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    7. Re:No IPv6 huh? by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are aliens supposed to do without their evil bit?

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    8. Re:No IPv6 huh? by ABetterRoss · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Aliens could have been using Appletalk!

    9. Re:No IPv6 huh? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Funniest Matrix post ever. Thanks. :-)

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    10. Re:No IPv6 huh? by Hast · · Score: 1

      The Horror, The Horror.

  9. reported yesterday by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

    reported yesterday by one of our slashdotters ;)

    I still miss the swordfish like graphics though.
    It was a lot more exciting - with Trovolta going yes! yes ! from the back.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:reported yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was much more exciting when Hali Berry was topless.

  10. Sexy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...Tritnity uses Nmap to find a vulnerable SSH server, and then exploits it using the SSH1 CRC32 exploit from 2001.."

    Now THAT is sexy! :)

    1. Re:Sexy by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

      mmmmm Trinity... She can exploit me any time she wants!

    2. Re:Sexy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooooooh yea,
      before she was just a black-leather-clad hot-chick who only spoke of her previous hacks, never showing her actual talent. But now that we actually see her doing it, she's UBER-k00l now!
      lol

    3. Re:Sexy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to scan her ports!!!

    4. Re:Sexy by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      I suppose you've already tried "finger trinity"?

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  11. Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Now we know that we cannot hack into the Matrix from our Personal Computer:

    As you can see on the screenshot, the IP is 10.2.2.2, which is on the 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 network reserved for private usage.

    It's impossible to reach such an IP directly (without hacking their server / router / firewall first) from an arbitrary point of the Internet.

    Damn!

    1. Re:Private Network! by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Funny

      After assing the movie I promptly went home and changed my entire home IP network to the 10.2.2.x subnet. The home FreeBSD server is now 10.2.2.2, so everytime I jump in to modify the firewall or whatever I can feel like I'm "hacking the matrix" ...my life is pathetic :(

    2. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      for the last time she wasn't hacking the Matrix, she was inside the POWER PLANT hacking the POWER PLANT


      sigh

    3. Re:Private Network! by usr122122121 · · Score: 1
      As you can see on the screenshot, the IP is 10.2.2.2, which is on the 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 network reserved for private usage.
      Well, wouldn't it make sense that if you were hacking the matrix from inside of it, that it would have an internal IP?

      Hell, if I ran the matrix, I'd want to have it on a LAN protected by a firewall as well.

      --

      -braxton
    4. Re:Private Network! by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      They were connecting to a power grid computer from the inside, not the 'Internet' I would certainly hope that power grid controlling computers are not on the public internet.

    5. Re:Private Network! by Jrod1080 · · Score: 1

      think of what would have happened had they given a "real" IP address, i.e. a non-private network IP. whoever had that unfortunate IP address would be blasted of the Internet by all the smart people trying to nmap it.

    6. Re:Private Network! by caluml · · Score: 1

      Hehe - in American Pie 1, you can actually see the IP address that he is streaming the video from - I wonder how many people have tried connecting to it?

    7. Re:Private Network! by perotbot · · Score: 1

      could it be that that the 10.x.x.x range is turning into the "555" of films? 555 is the first three digits of most phone numbers in movies, so is it unreasonable to think that 10.x.x.x could be the "movie" ip address?

      think of the havoc if they had M$'s ip address...

      --
      ~corporate tool, but employed~
    8. Re:Private Network! by feldy · · Score: 5, Funny

      After assing the movie

      The sad thing is, I have no idea what verb you were actually trying to use.

    9. Re:Private Network! by gantrep · · Score: 1

      Oh dear lord she was not "hacking the matrix"!!!! Since you didnt bother to watch the movie very closely, the least you could do is read the other slashtard's posts first.

    10. Re:Private Network! by capnjack41 · · Score: 1

      I believe that IP address was fictitious, either a reserved address or some silly thing like 314.192.36.389

    11. Re:Private Network! by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tinted my terminal green after seeing it, so don't feel so ashamed ;)

    12. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      After assing the movie...

      Hey, I was at that theater and really... not liking the movie is still no excuse to run up and place your butt up on the screen.

    13. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my terminal is so old it has several different shades of green, and that is it. :(

    14. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, your life truly is pathetic.

    15. Re:Private Network! by caluml · · Score: 1
      I believe you are wrong ;)
      http://mjf_hollywood.tripod.com/movies/movies/a/am ericanpie.html

      snip: The URL for the webcam broadcast that Jim emails to his friends is http://128.220.27.192/temp/NadiaVision. (The IP address actually belongs to the Department of Psychology of the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD.)/snip

    16. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if this will become like the 555 prefix in tv/movies, as more people get on the internet, we don't want them to see something at a real ip address being hacked/accessed in a movie and then going home and jacking with it.

    17. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you may be interested in seeing what some people (who know a little about networking), think about this P2P project... follow the thread e2e mailing list

    18. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (posting as anonymous coward because I really don't need another account to keep track of right now...)

      Just tell people you tinted your terminal green because you're an Apple ][ fan. The nostaligic old fart points counteract the dorky fanboy points.

    19. Re:Private Network! by usr122122121 · · Score: 1
      Oh dear lord she was not "hacking the matrix"!!!! Since you didnt bother to watch the movie very closely
      Dude, I haven't seen the move at all :-)
      --

      -braxton
    20. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what ? .. my terminal IS green long before that movie.. back in 1985 it was light green on dark green (huh, monitor problems, i suppose), and now it's
      aterm -fg green -bg black -fn -rfx-fixed-medium-*-*-*-13-*-*-*-*-60-*-*

    21. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as far as i know, 555 is not used anywhere as a valid office code. 10.X.X.X is outlined as private address space and therefore used and re-used hundreds of times on private / internal LANs

      It is good practice that the power grid used this internal address space, as a security measure, to preserve the number of publicly addressable IP's, et al.

      It could be both the IP address of choice of the movie world, or the reality of a decent, realistic IP schema that would in fact be in use in many offices, power plants, goevernment offices, anywhere with the need for more hosts than IP's doled out by their ISP.

      later.

    22. Re:Private Network! by darxyde · · Score: 0

      Don't feel too bad - i did the same thing....

      --
      Hey relax fella, you need a rest, guy.
    23. Re:Private Network! by the-build-chicken · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got dressed up in a tight black vinyl female suit, padded a bra, died my hair black and cut it short, put on lipstick.......yeah, green...I mean yeah, I turned my terminal green too...that's what i did

    24. Re:Private Network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure hope not! My LAN is on 10.x.x.x

    25. Re:Private Network! by sanity_slipping · · Score: 1

      Dude! Cool idea!

      --
      I can feel my sanity, beyond my reach and slipping...
  12. Before you say it... by tbmaddux · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...exploits it using the SSH1 CRC32 exploit from 2001.
    I'm sure there will be lots of funny jokes posted about using a 2001 exploit far into the future, patching systems, etc. etc. However, while the Matrix films are set in the future, the Matrix is set in the present, at the "peak of your civilization" according to Agent Smith. So it is appropriate for Trinity to hack a present-day system using a present-day exploit. She could even be ahead of her time, if the first movie was set in 1999 and it's only 6 months later, then the Matrix might not even have gotten through Y2K yet (did I just spoil the third movie).

    Aside from the amusing idea of having someone hack a computer program using their avatar inside the computer-generated construct of the Matrix, this sameness of the Matrix over long time periods raises an unanswered question in my mind. Why don't the people notice the lack of advancement in the Matrix? Over a hundred years of 1999-ness... no stunning advances in CGI, or science, or anything!

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    1. Re:Before you say it... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats the point: the world has progressed most likely. The matrix has apparently been running between 500 and 600 years (since The One is a systemic anomoly, and Morpheus makes repeated note that this current Zion has been around for 100 years, its likely that each One takes 100 years). Most likely, after the first [Utopic] Matrix failed, they did one of the following:

      1: To periodically reset the time in the matrix, by permitting all the adults to die while not maintaining crops of infants in suspended animation. Once the adults died, they would then revive the children, and have software "parents" raise them. I dont really like this option, it seems pretty unlikely.

      2: The first matrix after the Utopic failure was set in the 14th century, i.e. the beginnings of the Renaissance. This would fit with Smith's description of "the peak of your civilization", depending on your perspective, since this was the period of scientific enlightment. This also sits well with the Oracle's statement that the myths of supernatural creatures all derive from bugs/rogue programs in the Matrix. This also sits well with the idea of the first One appearing, since this was a period wherein people were dramatically reforming their conception of the universe.

      There are probably other solutions, but these are two I've thought of.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    2. Re:Before you say it... by weave · · Score: 1
      It's interesting the relationships of the "code" in the matrix, like eating a cake causes a routine to execute in the cake to achieve the desired effect.

      So the human subjects in the matrix still are working their brains in their little tubs, so I imagine as they invent things, those things would be adapted, assimilated, and used by the machines running the matrix, especially if...

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      SPOILER

      ... if it was invented in a prior instance or nested concurent instance of the matrix...

      Imagine the ability to hack the matrix by writing bad code on purpose. The ssh1 coder would then be a hero, by introducing indirectly a vulnerability into the machine's control system -- if there is one that is...

      END SPOILER

      END SPOILER

      END SPOILER

    3. Re:Before you say it... by dokutake · · Score: 1

      Maybe they set it at 1999 because they were worried about the Y2K bug. I guess robots don't see the need for four digit dates.

      --
      - Peter
    4. Re:Before you say it... by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Why don't the people notice the lack of advancement in the Matrix? Over a hundred years of 1999-ness... no stunning advances in CGI, or science, or anything!

      Because the new tech is always hyped on Slashdot, then everyone forgets about it for years until an 'Ask Slashdot' is posted wondering where all this cool shit went.

    5. Re:Before you say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robots also prefer to keep their dates in ASCII instead of just binary. Duh.

    6. Re:Before you say it... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      becasue the machines have control over them so tehy can blank their memories. also it could be due to the fact that the matrix gets reset every time the one comes around.

      though considering the probabilities of the one showing up the matrix could be as old as 7000 years old but if you take morpheus's statment about how they have been fighting the machiines for 100 years and there have been 6 ones before then it could only be 700 years old. (it is interesting though that the only reason the previouse one knew he would return some day was becasue he had talked to the Architect and been clued in :-) )

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Before you say it... by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Why don't the people notice the lack of advancement in the Matrix? Over a hundred years of 1999-ness... no stunning advances in CGI, or science, or anything!

      I wondered the same thing myself.

      My guess is that the simulated physics of the matrix is simplified so that 1999 level technology is as far as one can go. For example, its possible to get to the moon using only Newtonian physics. (We did it after all) But if your world is only Newtonian, there are somethings you will never do. (Modern Transistors and Nanotechnology) Perhaps the scientists of the Matrix think they have found the Theory of Everything, or are very close.

    8. Re:Before you say it... by sc00p18 · · Score: 1

      then the Matrix might not even have gotten through Y2K yet (did I just spoil the third movie).

      Nope, not even close.

    9. Re:Before you say it... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      if that were true then the machines would have had a way for humans to hack into the matrix even in the renesonce.

      I would love to agree with your second point but right now we do not have the entire story. I think we will have to wait to have neo rip out the information about the true history of the matrix from the architect before we truely understand it.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    10. Re:Before you say it... by Hungus · · Score: 1

      So Chairman Bill is really a Hero?

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    11. Re:Before you say it... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing: while the people inside the matrix would be experiencing the Renaissance, the world outside the matrix would still be a 22nd or 23rd century one, including all the tech running the matrix itself.

      Now remember, after the Utopia, the Oracle and Architect knew there'd be a One (they planned on it, as a solution to the systemic anomoly). So when The One appears, its intuitive - i.e. he has no one guiding him to understand the world. More likely than not, he was a monk or priest or some other type of meditative ascetic. When he came to realize the truth, the machines probably were quite honest with him, explaining the situation. Since The One wasn't receiving contrary claims (i.e. by Zionists), he might not think this was a bad thing. Then, the machines use the first One to build Zion.

      Granted, if you were a 15th century intellectual who suddenly found out the world was FAR more technologically advanced than you realized before, it might be harded to understand than for a 20th century intellectual, but its still feasable. Once they had that realization, and were detached from the Matrix, they'd have the technology required from the previous Zionists. Of course, this technology would originally come from the machines, who gave it to the One, to build the first Zion. After all, thats what hte Architect was asking of Neo: to rebuild the next Zion fresh, with 23 individuals from the current Matrix (notice, not from the current Zion).

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    12. Re:Before you say it... by tbmaddux · · Score: 1
      The first matrix after the Utopic failure was set in the 14th century, i.e. the beginnings of the Renaissance.
      That's an interesting idea, and it could fit well with "Program" from Animatrix. I was initially confused about why they were fighting in medieval Japan, and eventually decided it was just for style. But if what you say is true, then they were from an earlier iteration of the One, and the metaphorical/construct timeline was appropriately set.

      Since the Matrix is just metaphor, they could presumably interact with it / hack into it using something other than rotary-dial phones as entry points.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    13. Re:Before you say it... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Because the new tech is always hyped on Slashdot, then everyone forgets about it for years until an 'Ask Slashdot' is posted wondering where all this cool shit went.

      Now that yo umention it, where are our flying cars?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Before you say it... by phong3d · · Score: 1

      Hmm, it took place in 1999, but the twins were driving an Escalade EXT which wasn't introduced until the 2003 model year. Not to mention Trinity, Morpheus and the Keymaker get away in a CTS, which is also a new model.

    15. Re:Before you say it... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      then what was the origional motive to build the first Zion?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    16. Re:Before you say it... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1

      Time progresses.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    17. Re:Before you say it... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Bleah... they always give the concept cars to Hollywood types and celebs. Go figure....

    18. Re:Before you say it... by beebware · · Score: 2, Funny

      They've evolved to become invisible flying cars - that's why you can't see them.

    19. Re:Before you say it... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      According to the Architect, it was to counter-balance the need for humans to have a sense of choice.

      In the Utopic matrix, people had no choice about their existence, if they were born in: they could only live in paradise. This caused several crops to be lost, according to Smith. Then, a program originally designed to understand human psychology (described as an "intuitive program" by the Architect) realized that this stemmed from the human need, psychologically, for choice. This was the Oracle.

      So, they created an imperfect matrix, one with suffering. This was to create the impetus for the choice to be made, albeit on a subconscious level. However, without a viable option opposed to the matrix, the choice would be meaningless. Thus, they encouraged the existence of the system anomoly - The One - who then helped them build the first Zion as the opposing option to the matrix.

      Its all to create a choice, albeit one that in the end is also illusory.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    20. Re:Before you say it... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Nah, they keep changing the code to prevent advancements... Did you think all the duplicate stories on slashdot was just a coincidence? Deja vu, my friend.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    21. Re:Before you say it... by gdarklighter · · Score: 1

      A few clarifications on what other people have been saying...the Matrix has not been running continuously for 600 years. Every time The One comes along, it's rebooted (or possibly reinstalled, upgraded, whatever). So it's perfectly possible for the Matrix to keep running the years 1900-2000 over and over and over again. That way, they keep the illusion of progress.

    22. Re:Before you say it... by Kirijini · · Score: 1

      The Matrix hasn't been running for 500-600 years. Its reloaded every 100. In other words, it's reset. So, it probably goes from 1950 to 2050 (when mankind discovered AI), then loops back to 1950. Remember that the Matrix can build false pasts for people - thats what Mr. Reagan (Cypher) wanted in the first movie, to be made a wealthy actor, and not remember about the Matrix. Excess people (That is, 1950 had less people than 2050 will have, by about 5 billion or so) could be liquified, then reserved to feed people when food stocks run low. That seems to fit what we've been told by the movie well.

    23. Re:Before you say it... by minion · · Score: 1

      Why don't the people notice the lack of advancement in the Matrix? Over a hundred years of 1999-ness... no stunning advances in CGI, or science, or anything!

      Because the Matrix really is evil: They made Microsoft win, and it has stifled innovation. Those poor people, no wonder the humans are able to jump into the matrix at will, the dumb agents are simply using Windows XP's internet filewall defaults!

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    24. Re:Before you say it... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I suspect that progress is stiffled by the machines. For one thing, there probably aren't actually any scientists or engineers would are actual people; the jobs are filled by simulations, and they don't come up with anything new. When people figure things out and write them down, the paper gets lost or the computer loses the file. Everybody's working a mindless, dead-end job that doesn't get anywhere.

      Of course, the simulation can't improve too much, because then the people could break out of it by developing AIs which could outsmart the machines even though they're simulated.

    25. Re:Before you say it... by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Now that I think about it, Neo's boss who bitched him out for oversleeping did seem a little like he could have been a relative of Agent Smith's.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    26. Re:Before you say it... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      ok, so basicly, zion sol pourpose is to give the one a sence of choice since he/she can see throught the false choice of the matrix.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    27. Re:Before you say it... by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      Why don't the people notice the lack of advancement in the Matrix? Over a hundred years of 1999-ness... no stunning advances in CGI, or science, or anything!

      They should hit the public in 5-10 years.

    28. Re:Before you say it... by shogun · · Score: 1

      Would the flow of time in the Matrix neccesarily occur at the same speed as in the 'real world'? The 6 months in the 'real world' could of been a much different time in the matrix, maybe 2-3 years..

    29. Re:Before you say it... by Poeir · · Score: 1

      We don't need them any more, now that people can just crouch and send shockwaves through the ground before taking off into the air.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    30. Re:Before you say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can see the shell of the twin towers in the vision of the future in the first Matrix. Get over it.

    31. Re:Before you say it... by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      its gotta be past y2k, how else did the bad guys get to drive an 2002/2003 model Escalade?

    32. Re:Before you say it... by hiero · · Score: 1

      Since Agent Smith is a machine, I would interpret his reference to "the peak of your civilization" as the time at which humans "gave birth to AI".

    33. Re:Before you say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more importantly, is that like, the stupidest name for a car/SUV/whatever the hell you're talking about, yet?

  13. nmap is easily fooled by Adam+Rightmann · · Score: 4, Funny

    While namp is a neat hack, before any of you juvenile deliquents think of using it to commit computer hacking felonies, be aware that it is easily fooled.

    If you look at the source code, you can see which ports it queries, and which responses it maps against. We used this for great affect at Adequacy, http://www.adequacy.org, editing the registry of our Win 2k box, and the configuration files of the various TCP/IP programs to make it appear as a simple FreeBSD to the casual hacker.

    Oh, the laughs were on us when those script children proceeded to attempt to hack us with canned scripts for use against FreeBSD, only to fail. The looks on their pimply, greasy faces were probably priceless, only to be matched when the local law enforcement arrived at their parents house to confiscate their computers.

    --
    A. Rightmann
    1. Re:nmap is easily fooled by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

      nice work of fiction, but after our IRCd servers were DoS'd attacked, hacked, and violated, not anyone, police or the FBI really cared. The firewall logs took 92MB. You smell of... bull.

      --
      I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    2. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      And when the cops arrived at these kiddies homes I'm sure kids claimed they didn't do anything. Then the police said, "Yeah right man" Your last name is awesome :P

    3. Re:nmap is easily fooled by antsquish · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... and after all that work making it appear as a FreeBSD box, you go and confess to all of slashdot that it's really a Win2k box...... I guess that saves everyone a bit of work? :-)

    4. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Bananenrepublik · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm wondering why www.adequacy.org went down _now_? Maybe somehow someone found out about your top secret protection scheme?

    5. Re:nmap is easily fooled by MadAtGravity · · Score: 1

      matrix# nmap -P0 -sS -p 80 www.adequacy.org

      Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA25 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
      Interesting ports on (66.180.229.40):
      Port State Service
      80/tcp filtered http

      Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 37 seconds
      matrix# telnet www.adequacy.org 80
      Trying 66.180.229.40...
      telnet: connect to address 66.180.229.40: Connection timed out

      [SYSTEM FAILURE]

    6. Re:nmap is easily fooled by goonda · · Score: 1

      This is pointless though, as most script kiddies will launch their latest 31337 spl0it against any host, without bothering to check if its the right OS, or even running the service they are trying to exploit.

      Obscurity != Security

    7. Re:nmap is easily fooled by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

      Yup, *really* easily fooled. It thinks your win2k box is a smouldering pile of wreckage that isn't worki...oh, wait...

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
    8. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you were using the wrong OS. Surely if you were running microsnoft, they would send FBI agents after the hackers that exploited some null string bug.

    9. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Looks more like their site should be http://www.inadequacy.org.

      /me laughs at this admins stupidity.

    10. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAH!

      Fooled you again! it really is a FreeBSD box made to look like a win2k box!

      .... Doh!

      -A. Rightmann

    11. Re:nmap is easily fooled by damiam · · Score: 1

      He's from Adequecy, what else would you expect?

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    12. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that actually happened, I imagine it'd be quite amusing. Unfortunately the sad truth is that the adequacy.org staff are nothing more than a bunch of lying, insignificant trolls that have conglomerated together to form a website full of misinformation, low-brow humour, and general harassment of other online communities. Probably to increase traffics to said site.

      Just in case there were too many big words in there for you, Adam, it means I think that you're completely full of shit.

    13. Re:nmap is easily fooled by darxyde · · Score: 0

      heheheh... silly script kiddies

      203.231.144.112 - - [16/May/2003:01:46:29 +1000] "GET /scripts/root.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 302 312
      203.231.144.112 - - [16/May/2003:01:46:30 +1000] "GET /MSADC/root.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 302 312
      203.231.144.112 - - [16/May/2003:01:46:30 +1000] "GET /c/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 302 312
      203.231.144.112 - - [16/May/2003:01:46:31 +1000] "GET /d/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 302 312
      203.231.144.112 - - [16/May/2003:01:46:31 +1000] "GET /scripts/..%255c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 302 31
      2

      --
      Hey relax fella, you need a rest, guy.
    14. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Adequacy.org is offline after you mentioned it here.

      Boy do I pray that your co-workers do not know your screen name here. Otherwise you may be cleaning out your desk on monday.

      I feel sorry for you if this is the case. Script kiddies piss me off. If I had a server I sure as hell would not advertise it here on slashdot. Especially what OS its running and how I have it secured for obvious reasons.

      I like your advise and when I do own my server in college next year hopefully I will try to fool the os name as well. They are honeypot projects you may want to try out. Basically they are a fake rooted server environments that pretends to be another os and log everything behind a crackers back. In the meantime your server or "real user modes" are not effected.

      If a script kiddie thinks he is in he will not look for any other holes and you can hide the identity of the server and log everything. They are quite usefull agaisnt spammers as well.

      There are honeypot open pop3 mail relays that fake spam generations. The daemon just moves the spam into /dev/null in the meantime and reports to the spammer that the spam is sent out.

    15. Re:nmap is easily fooled by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The truely funny part is that the stack is from BSD. MS went to a great deal of work to try and hide it (they failed miserably, but they still worked hard). Now, you try to make it look like BSD.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    16. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Paddyish · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nice. You are, of course, operating under a number of false assumptions:

      1.) No script kiddies frequent /.
      2.) No true hackers frequent /.
      3.) NMap is the sole hacking tool used in the world.
      4.) Adequacy has adequate security to field an attack where a skilled attacker knows key information about the server and configuration.

      Based on these four false predicates, and the fact that Adequacy.com's server quickly went MIA after your post, I deduce that come Monday, you will be in a heap of shit and a world of hurt. Elementary, my dear Rightmann.

      Thanks for the laugh. Good luck on your new job hunt.

    17. Re:nmap is easily fooled by chragaku · · Score: 1

      Even better, he's saved himself a bit of work, since all he did was give a small bit of information he knew about the servers at a company he most likely isn't associated with. Viola! Someone will do the dirty work for him.

      --
      See you in hell, dinner plate.
    18. Re:nmap is easily fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Cello! to you!

    19. Re:nmap is easily fooled by cyroth · · Score: 1

      This is the funniest thing I have seen all week

    20. Re:nmap is easily fooled by sanity_slipping · · Score: 1

      I didn't really think you were from adequacy.org - I thought you were mocking them.

      However, the third paragraph definitely confirmed that you are from Adequacy.org
      -------

      --
      I can feel my sanity, beyond my reach and slipping...
  14. screenshots? by mnemon1c · · Score: 1

    so, exactly how did they acquire the movie screen shots (legally)?

    --
    Ah, the last peanut -- overflowing with the oil and salt of its departed brothers. -Homer
  15. Screen Shots ?! by gurnb · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do they have screen shots ?! Is it possible that this movie has been leaked out to the INTERNET?!

    It's madness I tell you, madness!!!

    Still waiting for disc 2 to d/l, so I can verify this for myself. Purely for educational reasons.

    --
    "This must be a Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays."
    1. Re:Screen Shots ?! by Istealmymusic · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Is there anything morally wrong with downloading an esoteric release of Reloaded online? I went to the movies, paid my money, contributing to the $44 billion or so profit of Warner Brothers. I don't feel guilty downloading a crappy quality VCD to notice all the details and things I missed. (But I did notice the terminal with ssh and nmap on it).

      Nothing wrong at all.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    2. Re:Screen Shots ?! by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't plan on downloading it for awhile, at the very least. I'll tell you what, watching it on the 75 foot screen is worth the $5. Yeah, I could watch it on my computer/tv, but for now, the experience is much better in the theater

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    3. Re:Screen Shots ?! by feepness · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there anything morally wrong with downloading an esoteric release of Reloaded online? I went to the movies, paid my money, contributing to the $44 billion or so profit of Warner Brothers. I don't feel guilty downloading a crappy quality VCD to notice all the details and things I missed. (But I did notice the terminal with ssh and nmap on it).

      Nothing wrong at all.


      It's irrelevant how you feel. Guilt is based on legality, under which you clearly are guilty. Whether it's wrong or not is an entirely different matter, but as a matter of principle I've always operated under "two wrongs don't make a right".

    4. Re:Screen Shots ?! by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1
      Am I legally guilty if I only downloaded the movie, but did not watch it in its entirety? If I only viewed certain portions?

      What is the second wrong? I watched Matrix Reloaded on the big screen (right), and downloaded a VCD afterwords (arguably wrong). What else?

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    5. Re:Screen Shots ?! by feepness · · Score: 1

      Am I legally guilty if I only downloaded the movie, but did not watch it in its entirety? If I only viewed certain portions?

      IANAL, but my guess is that the act of downloading is the illegal bit.

      What is the second wrong? I watched Matrix Reloaded on the big screen (right), and downloaded a VCD afterwords (arguably wrong). What else?

      1) Violating the law simply because you "feel" it's ok. This is not conducive to a constructive society.
      2) Violating the wishes of the copyright holder. Whether they are wrong, stupid, or anything else, I believe they have the right to choose how others obtain content they create.

    6. Re:Screen Shots ?! by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      There is something wrong... you're downloading a version so you can watch it again to notice what you missed the first time you saw it...

      What you're supposed to do is go to the cinema again to see it again. Or wait until the DVD comes out and buy that.

      If a movie is good enough to warrent multiple viewings immediately, then the film makers, who put a lot of time into the film, to make you want to watch it multiple times, should be compensated.

      If you can wait, then you only pay once more, for the DVD, and can watch it as many times as you like.

      Besides... surely the only VCD copies of it at the moment are those damn 'guy in cinema with camera filming the screen'... my god they're horrible to watch... and for a film like this, surely you're killing the exprience with such a viewing?

    7. Re:Screen Shots ?! by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1
      1) Violating the law simply because you "feel" it's ok. This is not conducive to a constructive society.
      Since when is one's reason for violating a law an additional transgression to the violation of the law itself?
      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    8. Re:Screen Shots ?! by feepness · · Score: 1

      1) Violating the law simply because you "feel" it's ok. This is not conducive to a constructive society.

      Since when is one's reason for violating a law an additional transgression to the violation of the law itself?


      Because in this particular area we were discussing the morality of the act in addition to the legality. It is a transgression against the law AND a transgression against morality. I think most would agree that willful violation of a law for personal entertainment is immoral. Certain circumstances (let's say orders to shoot POWs) might make violating authority a moral act. See the difference? That is also in addition to the immorality of violating the creator's rights to control their creations.

      Look. You steal creativity. You're proud of it. That's gross to me. End of story.

    9. Re:Screen Shots ?! by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      two wrongs don't make a right

      I agree...I generally find it takes 5 or 6

    10. Re:Screen Shots ?! by 3.1415926535 · · Score: 1

      You can't pause and rewind a movie on the big screen.

    11. Re:Screen Shots ?! by MasterRa · · Score: 1

      Yes, the VCD is horrible. But that's not the point. In fact, i think that helps his point.. I have the VCD too. In fact, i got it before i saw the movie in the theater. I did NOT watch it before then, because of your reasons - I knew it would be MUCH more impressive on the big screen. I watched it in the theater this past weekend. I paid their price - which is horribly inflated, i might add. And when the DVD comes out, you better beleive i'll be buying it right away. So i don't feel that having the VCD is in any way wrong - These guys deserve my monitary support, and i will give it to them. As far as the law goes - if the law is immoral, it is our duty to break it.

    12. Re:Screen Shots ?! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      Look. You steal creativity. You're proud of it. That's gross to me. End of story.

      No, that isn't the end of the story.

      Maybe it's a little bit premature to trot out this scenario as a DVD copy of Reloaded hasn't been released, but I'm going to trot it out anyway:

      Situation 1: I buy a copy of a DVD and invite my friends over to watch it with me. They get to watch it without paying.

      Situation 2: I buy a copy of a DVD, rip it, and FTP it to the same friends. They get to watch it without paying.

      Now what exactly is the difference, ethically, and morally, in those two situations? The truth is there is no difference! They're the ones who permitted me to purchase a copy of a movie and there are no constraints pertaining to who I can show it to, providing I don't charge admission. In any case, this whole notion that "creativity" is somehow "property that can be stolen" is ludicrous, especially now, given the new reality that an infinite number of one-off digital copies can be made of a creative work with little or no effort or expense. This is a reality that "content producers" are going to have to learn to deal with...a reality for which conventional legal, ethical, or moral arguments do not apply.

      Now before anyone gets all sanctimonious on me here, I should state that my preferred medium for watching a good movie is on a big screen in a theatre, but I don't go to movies in theatres because I believe it to be "unethical" to download them for free. I go to them in a theatre because the theatre is providing a higher quality entertainment experience. It is providing "a high quality entertainment experience" (big-screen theatres; live performances etc) that I believe should be the focus of "content producers" and believe me, if the quality is there, I will be happy to support them financially. Hit me with some specious ethical reasonings and I will be just as happy to tell them to bugger off and die.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    13. Re:Screen Shots ?! by feepness · · Score: 1

      Situation 1: I buy a copy of a DVD and invite my friends over to watch it with me. They get to watch it without paying.

      Situation 2: I buy a copy of a DVD, rip it, and FTP it to the same friends. They get to watch it without paying.

      Now what exactly is the difference, ethically, and morally, in those two situations? The truth is there is no difference! They're the ones who permitted me to purchase a copy of a movie and there are no constraints pertaining to who I can show it to, providing I don't charge admission.


      Read the following, stop, and please just think for a moment about how much your greed has blinded you. I do NOT think you are stupid.

      The obvious difference is that the friends have to be in the physical presence of the purchased DVD to watch the content. The first is conducive to local friends numbering in the tens, maybe twenties. These local friends also cannot watch the content at their convenience and cannot pass the content onto others. The second number of "friends" can be in the millions all across the planet and can easily pass the content onto their friends. The first encourages more content to be purchased. End of story.

      Also, if there truly isn't a difference, why not just purchase it as the creator wishes?

    14. Re:Screen Shots ?! by ripewithdecay · · Score: 1

      I went to the movies and saw it twice.

      Does that mean I can download the Centropy release? ;)

  16. lol.. by DaLiNKz · · Score: 3, Funny

    This was actually sorta cool when i read it in this story.. It was interesting to see her portscan then jump into the server.. The chick sittin next to me wasnt aware of anything about it because she doesnt use linux, but i was like "OI!!! Thats real! look look!!! SSH!!! LOOK!!" .. then a few people looked at me weird :s

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
  17. Pix by spoonist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pictures can be found on Fyodor's site.

    Oh, and I must say, that Trinity freakin' kicks ass. As you can see from the pictures, nmap says "No exact OS matches for host". Trinity goes ahead and throws the sploit anyway without knowing the system's architecture AND IT WORKS!

    That just kicks ass.

    A big Eartha-Kitt-Cat-Woman growl for Trinity.

    1. Re:Pix by kampit · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah, and if you look at the pictures closer, you notice

      (The 1539 ports scanned but not shown below are in the state: closed)
      /t State Service
      /tcp open ssh


      So she does know there's an sshd running on the system, then she throws the 'spoit and it works.. maybe you'd prefer it if there had been a 3 hour sequence where she coded up her own exploit, DDoS'd the whole matrix and pranced around in the nude saying 'marvelous!', but sometimes you just have to make sacrifices to please the general audience :)
    2. Re:Pix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no spoonist.

    3. Re:Pix by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      "maybe you'd prefer it if there had been a 3 hour sequence where she coded up her own exploit, DDoS'd the whole matrix and pranced around in the nude saying 'marvelous!" i smeeeeeeell DIRECTOR'S CUT!!!

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    4. Re:Pix by RighteousFunby · · Score: 1
      pranced around in the nude saying 'marvelous!', but sometimes you just have to make sacrifices to please the general audience


      That would probably please the general audience.
    5. Re:Pix by Drogo+Knotwise · · Score: 1

      I think the general (male) audience would have enjoyed that last part. ;-) It all depends on how much of the 3 hour sequence is dedicated to the naked dancing.

    6. Re:Pix by shogun · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for all of us when I say it already feels like theres already 3 hours of (near) naked dancing in the film. Die rave scene die!

    7. Re:Pix by cyroth · · Score: 1

      Yeah I think people are really clever every time we get hit with an IIS exploit

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your user ID is triple-6, triple-9. Yuo are the k3wl!

  20. Sequels detract from the original by hillct · · Score: 1

    I saw the movie last night and was disappointed generally, in that it was not as good as the first movie, but sequels are produced with the recognition that each sequel will have 2/3 the audience of it's predecessor, so I guess it's proffitable, but at some point producing sequels will devalue the original to the point where it will affect the overall perception of the franchise.

    My biggest objection is Trinity has lost her whole S&M mystique in favor of this nice cuddly feel. Seems a real shame. Oh Well.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:Sequels detract from the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My biggest objection is Trinity has lost her whole S&M mystique in favor of this nice cuddly feel. Seems a real shame. Oh Well.

      You're the type of person that would fuck a man in the ass, and not even have the common courtesy to give him a reach-around.

    2. Re:Sequels detract from the original by caluml · · Score: 1

      Browsing Slashdot at -1, I have learned stuff about things that I never wanted to.

    3. Re:Sequels detract from the original by spiro_killglance · · Score: 1

      Thats becauses she in love of course. Watch out
      for the Matrix 3, where Neo and Trinity will
      be wearing matching cardigians.

  21. Script children? by SumDeusExMachina · · Score: 0

    Are you sure that it wasn't Fyodor himself?

    --

    Is your company running tools written by ma
  22. SSH: security through obscurity? by gpinzone · · Score: 1

    In this article, I'm surprised by the following quote:

    "I think there are at least two public exploits in circulation right now," said Zalewski, in a telephone interview. "They just got released about a month after the advisory. And I know there are some that are not public."

    I though security through obscurity was something only Microsoft did? Why are there ssh exploits that we (the users) don't know about? Everyone has access to the code so where are these millions of eyeballs? It appears there's only a few who are able to really decipher the source code and understand it.

    1. Re:SSH: security through obscurity? by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it's common for there to be exploits that are not generally well known. As long as you are aware of the bug that makes the exploits useful, and are made aware of how to patch ssh to prevent the bug from being exploited, it doesn't matter how many different exploits there are. If you have patched, or taken the advisory's other actions, you won't be affected by techniques that exploit that bug, whether public or not.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    2. Re:SSH: security through obscurity? by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      I don't buy into that. If there are other ways a bug can be exploted, the "public" should know about it.

    3. Re:SSH: security through obscurity? by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

      Here, let me take you down Hypothetical Scenario lane.

      Notoriously Bad Programmers, Inc. (NBPI) creates an application that allows a Linux or Unix machine to publish its disk usage information as an MP3 file, and release it as open source. Some days later, a bug is discovered that has the potential to allow an arbitrary user to edit the MP3 file so that it plays "Dankeschoen" as performed by Wayne Newton, instead of the "Danger, WIll Robinson" clip from Lost In Space. The bug is patched, and it is later discovered that the same bug can be used to print random PDF code to syslog. The first patch solves both problems.

      What difference does it make if the second exploit exists if the first patch fixes it? What happens if I create an exploit five years from now, which uses the same bug, that allows me to switch the sample rate on the exported MP3 file from 22 to 44? If you have patched the bug, it is wholly irrelevant what the exploits are. If additional exploits are discovered which uncover different bugs, that's one thing ... actually, it's a different issue. There is a responsibility on the part of the open source community, and especially those people who create or modify open source software, to share information about bugs and how to repair them. There is no corresponding responsibility to share information about how to exploit those bugs.

      If it's information about the exploits you are after, read the code yourself, and then hack up some exploits. Then, you will know what they are, and you won't need to download the rootkits from various sites around the world, later. You can stop being a kiddie and become '1337 all on your own.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    4. Re:SSH: security through obscurity? by bwt · · Score: 1

      You are confusing exploits with vulnerabilities.

      The vulnerability in question is now well documented and has been patched a long time.

      The exploits are written by crackers who don't want to publish their source precisely because it would lead to a faster identification and fixing of the vulnerability.

  23. Wooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You should never log in as root :x

  24. A touch of realism. by Gray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now if only that human body as a power supply thing made a lick of sense.

    I hope some Saberhagen Berserker's show up in the next movie and settle everybodies hash real good.

    1. Re:A touch of realism. by andfarm · · Score: 1

      For "electrical power" read "processing power". At least, that's what I did. Makes a good deal more sense that way, and you don't even have to break the laws of thermodynamics.

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

  25. I KNEW it was too good to be true by slainfu · · Score: 0

    My beautiful Trinity is nothing more than a lousy script-kiddie! :(

    --

    slainfu
    "I can't be a terrorist if you're sucking my bum."
    1. Re:I KNEW it was too good to be true by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny
      Or to put it another way - maybe all script kiddies are like Trinity? :)

      Maybe the pimply-faced 14 year old stereotype is just a myth put about by the gorgeous women that actually deface websites, and DDoS IRC networks?

      I mean, who's **actually** met a script kiddie?

    2. Re:I KNEW it was too good to be true by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Damnit, now I'm going to get a woody every time I get hacked!

  26. future? by DreadSpoon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Keep seeing posts about "in the future they still have this hole" or similiar items.

    Remember, folks, the hack wasn't taking place in the future - it was in the Matrix. They weren't hacking the machines, they were hacking the "fake" computers in the power plant.

    Think of it like hacking into an ancient copy of usermode linux. ;-)

    1. Re:future? by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      Kinda funny that a reality ruled by computers can't even keep up with patches. Makes ya wonder how Windows Update can work if that doesn't! ;)

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    2. Re:future? by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1

      heh. Think you missed my point... :P

  27. Best. Story. Evar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trinity is a supar 1337 h4x0r!!! SSH rules! Nmap rulez! I love you all! Mod everyone up! Almost all of these comments are insightful!

  28. I can see it now... by iceT · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The envelope, please."

    "And the award for the best open-source hacking tool used in a motion picture goes to nmap, for it's cameo-appearence in Matrix: Reloaded"

    "Camera scans the audience where we see tripwire, sitting with his girlfriend ethereal... cuts to ndiff, who is just beaming w/ pride..."

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
  29. Bay Area by tedrlord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The great thing about watching the Matrix in a theater in Mountain View, CA, is that when that hacking scene came up, half the theater laughed or cheered. We're all geeks here.

    --
    [insert witty quote here]
    1. Re:Bay Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was surprised when I saw this scene. It was one of the more realistic hacks that I've ever seen in a movie. Very well done.

    2. Re:Bay Area by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They don't even bother putting a women's restroom in that theatre, huh?

    3. Re:Bay Area by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      I did say "half the theatre." I went to see it with five girls.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    4. Re:Bay Area by pll178 · · Score: 1

      Well, here in Pittsburgh, we didn't get any cheers for the hacking scene, instead, there were people laughing during the sex scene. I can't wait to get back to the Bay Area...

    5. Re:Bay Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You went to Century 16? That place sucks. This is the Matrix we're talking about. You should have gone to the Metreon or AMC 1000 in The City.

    6. Re:Bay Area by Piquan · · Score: 1

      I don't usually like to drive all the way to SF for most movies. (I live and work in Sunnyvale.) I personally prefer to go to Century Great Mall in Milpitas: every screen THX certified! For some reason, though, it's usually easier to convince friends to go to AMC Mercado 20 in Santa Clara. Also a worthy theater, very easy to get to. For the AMC, be sure to get tickets online first.

    7. Re:Bay Area by Piquan · · Score: 1

      You mean there's still geeks in the Silicon Valley? I thought they all moved to Austin!

    8. Re:Bay Area by SyntheticTruth · · Score: 1

      I saw the movie with our networking department here in West Michigan. When the cracking scene popped onto the screen there was a collective, whispered "Nice!" across the entire row.

      It was pretty cool.

      SynTruth

    9. Re:Bay Area by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Mountain View, CA

      Yeah, but who wants to eat soy popcorn with soy flavored butter sprinkled with alfalfa sprouts?

    10. Re:Bay Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of San Francisco, there's 30 miles of steak and beer loving peninsula between San Francisco and Mountain View.

    11. Re:Bay Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until it shows at the CMU friday night movie.

    12. Re:Bay Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't go to Mercado if my life depended on it. The parking lot sucks ass. And if you're in the south bay, why wouldn't you just go the Grand Daddy of awesome bay area theaters, Century 21?

    13. Re:Bay Area by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Because I mixed up theater names and was, in fact, talking about Century 21. The Mercado was in my head because somebody mentioned it the other day. Oops!

    14. Re:Bay Area by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      I did say "half the theatre." I went to see it with five girls.

      Let me guess...Mother Thumb and her 4 daughters?

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

  30. Well that's why she had to BREAK INTO the office! by cculianu · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you will remember the movie, that computer _was_ on a private network. She had to break into this private secure office building before she even began hacking. So she was behind the firewall already because she was physically in the building.

  31. My 2 cents... by Dthoma · · Score: 1

    ...I'm going to risk taking a karma hit for being Offtopic with a bit of speculation.

    If cracking someone's system, then why shouldn't you login as root? You might get caught? You're probably going to get caught anyway, so it doesn't matter too much. There's not too much point trying to get into an ordinary user's account since there's no guarantee that a particular username exists. The only one you can be reasonably sure of is "root".

    And once you have logged in as root, can't you just do:

    $ touch /etc/nologin
    $ /etc/init.d/sshd stop
    $ killall -9 mingetty
    $ killall -9 login

    to stop someone else logging in and stopping you?

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

    1. Re:My 2 cents... by cruppel · · Score: 1

      Uhh, she got caught all right =) I don't think I'd be able to ward off those "Security guards"

    2. Re:My 2 cents... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      $ touch /etc/nologin
      $ /etc/init.d/sshd stop
      $ killall -9 mingetty
      $ killall -9 login


      Note that this varies a bit by OS flavor/distro; my sshd script is at /etc/rc.d/rc.sshd and I use agetty.

      Somebody may already be logged in. You'll need to make sure to kill their shells. Most likely a server won't be running X, but if it is you'd want to kill that, since the user can launch an xterm (or Konsole or whatever).

      Except of course that if anyone is actually at the machine (it's not a headless box in a rack at a colo facility), and something alerts them to a problem (they see you kill X, or their shell disconnnects, or a user calls to say their shell just disconnected), they'll immediately attempt to log in, see that they can't, and take the box offline (by unplugging the Ethernet cable, for example).

      If nobody's actually there, then there's not much point in killing anything *getty and login, is there?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:My 2 cents... by treat · · Score: 2, Informative
      to stop someone else logging in and stopping you?

      1) You have not stopped telnet or other services run from inetd.
      2) Killall only does what you think it does on Linux. On Solaris, for instance, it does something rather more destructive.
      3) getty is started from init, killing it won't help.
      4) killing login will only stop people in the middle of logging in.

    4. Re:My 2 cents... by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      I rename my 'root' account to 'jim' and set up an account root that has no permissions and send me an email on my cell if it is accessed.

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
  32. Retards by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    This has been mentioned on /. more times than any human can count since the movie was released. This story is -1, Redundant.

  33. Trilogy, not original vs. schmequel by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I wonder how many times this has to be stated until people learn... The Matrix is a trilogy (like Back to the Future and LOTR), a single story split into three volumes/movies for convenience (because it's so long) and perhaps profit.

    The trilogy status hasn't been so obvious with The Matrix because, at the time of making the first part, the producers weren't sure if it would be worth it. As a side effect, the first part is a rather well contained story in itself, which is not a bad thing in a trilogy. Still, the first part left many important questions open, like the awakening of the rest of humanity, and any details on Zion.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:Trilogy, not original vs. schmequel by Mossfoot · · Score: 1

      Which is the same strategy used by Back to the Future (as you mention) as well as the first Star Wars trilogy. Too much money at stake to invest in a whole Trilogy (except for LOTR, but then they planned it well), so it's safter to go this route.

      --
      Fuzzy Knights: New RPG Strips Tuesday and Friday!:
      http://www.fuzzyknights.com
    2. Re:Trilogy, not original vs. schmequel by moertle · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you watch the bonus features of the Back to the Future DVD the first movie wasn't suppose to be continued. Only after its huge commercial success were parts 2 and 3 even written.

      Fuzzy Quote from one of the writers: "If I had known there was going to be a sequel I would never have put Jennifer in the car at the end of the first movie."

      --
      I hold a patent on sigs...
    3. Re:Trilogy, not original vs. schmequel by stanmann · · Score: 1

      So when I saw it in the theatre, and it said "TO BE Continued" that was just creative license??? WTH... Now I will grant that I haven't seen the interviews...

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  34. Respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must admit that I'm surprised (yes I haven't seen it yet), but positively so, that a filmmaker has finally moved beyond the flashy 3d crap, most prominently featured in Jurassic Park .. "It's a Unix system!" ... *barf*

    1. Re:Respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it was a UNIX system indeed. IRIX to be more accurate. It's running a program called FSN. You can check out an open source clone here.

      Imagine you find this weird system with a strange UI. You are navigating the fs and you notice that the layout is the same as a UNIX system, even though the UI is different than the normal command line. Would you expect something like that to be UNIX? Nope, but she realized it was UNIX. Hence the suprised, "I know this! This is UNIX!"

  35. Argh! by eonblueye · · Score: 1

    Its been posted on The Regsiter since May 16 (16 May 2003 3:12pm) http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/30747.html (link) and today May 18 and Slashdot is just now posting the story about it? ~Sigh.

    --
    +++ David Watts 5495 0.0 0.5 1888 884
    1. Re:Argh! by pope+nihil · · Score: 1

      Not everyone reads the register.

    2. Re:Argh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe they should... MAYBE THEY SHOULD.

  36. Re:SSH: security through obscurity? - NOPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are there ssh exploits that we (the users) don't know about?

    Are you trying to be funny, or did you not understand the statement you quoted?

    This is completely normal, as they're usually kept out of the public's hands by the black hats that write them.

    Sheesh, learn a little bit about security before you go trolling.

  37. There's some other strange things too. by Dthoma · · Score: 1

    One of the other available screenshots actually shows a command prompt, which appears to be just "RF-CONTROL>", which is rather odd. (No bash in the Matrix?) And there's a command in $PATH called "disable", which is executed as "disable grid nodes 21 - 40". Hmmm. I don't recall any tool written with getopt which would handle that sort of thing by default. And best of all, it actually gives a confirmation message. Huh? That can't be right. No UNIX tool gives a confirmation message without your prompting it to. It even has "ARE YOU SURE (y/n)" plastered across the centre of the screen!

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

    1. Re:There's some other strange things too. by turbod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever heard of custom software?

      Besides, why would the average grid operator want to individually log into the grid substations and disable them? A nice concise unix command would fire off scripts to do all that.... and yes, if I were the operator I'd want confirmation..

      Finally, this is just fiction, ya know? Heck, they used SSH though to make an appeal to geeks :)

      TurboD

    2. Re:There's some other strange things too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wipe asks for confirmation, unless you invoke it with -f
      i'm sure there's others too, this is the only one i can remember...

    3. Re:There's some other strange things too. by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

      ...a command prompt, which appears to be just "RF-CONTROL>"...
      She's apparently logged into a power grid control computer, which may be running a non-Unix(-like) OS. Ever log into a router or other embedded hardware with an obscure OS? They tend to have unusual (compared to Unix) shells/command interpreters.

      it actually gives a confirmation message... No UNIX tool gives a confirmation message without your prompting it to...
      Well, adduser in OpenBSD displays a confirmation message when you create new users.

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    4. Re:There's some other strange things too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because it's a movie. Not one bit of it is real. Does that address your concerns?

    5. Re:There's some other strange things too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rm -i for that matter. Many commands have certain safeguards built into them if people choose to use them.

      The first poster was obviously making a bad attempt at humor, or maybe sarcasm. At any rate it was a dumb ass post.

  38. Re:Well that's why she had to BREAK INTO the offic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully she took the time to NAT it so they wont have to break in to turn off the lights.

  39. Yep it is amazing by ThunderRiver · · Score: 1

    I know I know..they often use ip that's local, but still it is the first major step for Hollywood movie. I mean, it is just a movie, why would they even bother to make such technical step forward into hacking scene? Well, since they have done that, it shows that they have true profession in film industry ;)

    1. Re:Yep it is amazing by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      someone else already said that 10.x.x.x is the IP equivalent of 555-nnnn phone numbers in hollywood now.

      Remeber the crap that went around that "867-5309" song? (what the hell was that song anyway? -- "Jenny, I got your number..." is all I can remember other than the phone #). Every poor schmuck with that number in each area code got thousands of calls until they had to change their number. (or was it the AC/DC song, "dirty deeds" I'm thinking of?)

      I think they started using 555-nnnn numbers because, with the exception of 555-1212 (LD dir asst, IIRC) any number is pretty much guaranteed to not be a real number.

      Same thing now with IP. What, were they going to use some "real" IP? Sure, they probably could have gotten a real number from somewhere and used it, but I would imagine that might still invite problems (hey, people are going to try to at least ping it to see if it's real and that alone probably could tie things up somewhere). This is obviously safer -- any idiot that would try to actually own 10.2.2.2 isn't going to get very far (obviously).

      Still an order of magnitude better than anything I've seen in any other movie ("want to play a game?").

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Yep it is amazing by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Well, feel free to mod me down for replying to my own post:

      The Tommy Tutone song "Jenny (867-5309)" drove the phone companies (and their customers) nuts.

      "Jenny (867-5309)" caused nothing but grief for telephone customers unlucky enough to have that combination of numbers as their own. Its relentless chorus, "Jenny don't change your number - eight six seven five three oh nah-eeh-ah-ine," pounded the phone number into the minds of teenagers everywhere, resulting in waves of kids dialing it and asking for Jenny. The joke quickly became old for those who had the number and weren't interested in talking to horny teens.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    3. Re:Yep it is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Still an order of magnitude better than anything I've seen in any other movie ("want to play a game?").

      You didn't see Antitrust. If you're looking for tech realism, that movie's where it's at. Though they preferred to use the 192.168.0.0/16 netmask.

      It's a shining example of how films *can* do realistic tech scenes (or even realistic tech as a backdrop) without sacrificing understandability or suspense. The film itself is not for everyone, but I particularly enjoyed it. It's certainly the bar by which I measure all other films' accuracies.

      The Core, for one, does the limbo way under that bar.

  40. Back to The Future? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    Your argument was pretty good, apart from that!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:Back to The Future? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      You're right. Back To The Future was a popular mainstream movie that ordinary people could relate to somehow.

  41. Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew this story was a lie when you mentioned a chick sitting next to you.

    Unless of course this chick was with another guy or of the feathered variety, I have no choice but to call bullshit.

    1. Re:Lies by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

      lol isnt that a pathetic attempt at insulting me. You sicken the slashdot community.

      --
      I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    2. Re:Lies by Rick.C · · Score: 2, Funny
      I knew this story was a lie when you mentioned a chick sitting next to you.

      Your mind is closed, Grasshopper. You see only with your eyes. You think only what you wish to think. Close your eyes, Grasshopper. Open your mind.

      I also was sitting next to a really hot chick at The Matrix, but I didn't dare ask her name for fear of what her boyfriend would do to me.
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    3. Re:Lies by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      yeah, I woulda just called you a moron and been done with it.
      Moron.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. Re:actually it's been on the reg since Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you /.ers really are slow aren't you?

  44. Reading too much into it... by Mossfoot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What gets me is how some people go out of their way to nippick the movie to pieces "oh this is stupid, this makes no sense" and others love it so much that they read WAY too much into it.

    Take all the religous and phylosphical stuff about it. Yes, there is a lot of connections in there, it was put in the same way that other good story tellers use myth to make their world and stories feel more real and grander. The first Star Wars trilogy comes to mind. But then you have people who think every little thing is an intentional reference to something or other.

    One example. I heard that Neo dies for 72 seconds before he comes back to represent the 72 hours (3 days) Jesus died. I timed it, and it's crap. You can find 72 seconds in there, sure, but there is no place you can say "okay logically you start Neo's death here and his coming back to life here" and it adds up to 72 seconds. Very fuzzy logic going on there. But it is symtimatic of how much people want to find meaning in things like this.

    Is this a bad thing? Perhaps. One of the complaints I've heard of the sequal is that it's trying even harder to sound psudo-religious-phylosophical as a result of this faction of the fandom base.

    Tolkien said it best when he got annoyed at how people thought The Lord of the Rings was an analogy for World War 2 (and would be rolling over in his grave if he knew how people tried to equate the movies with September 11 and the war against terrorism).

    "I think that many confuse 'applicability' with 'alegory'; but the one resides in the freedom of the reader, and the other in the purposed domination of the author"

    Hey, didn't Morpheus himself say "free your mind"? Stop thinking every gawd damn word is meant to be spiritually profound! :P

    --
    Fuzzy Knights: New RPG Strips Tuesday and Friday!:
    http://www.fuzzyknights.com
    1. Re:Reading too much into it... by Rick.C · · Score: 1, Funny
      Hey, didn't Morpheus himself say "free your mind"? Stop thinking every gawd damn word is meant to be spiritually profound! :P

      Wow! You said "gawd". Not God, or god, but gawd.

      That's awesome!

      Are you implying that there is no one God, or even a multitude of gods?

      Profound!

      Now if you were typing in all lower-case, we could interpret "gawd" as an acronym that didn't get capitalized. But that's clearly not the case. So you're saying that gawd is not a proper noun and must therefore be a generic term, much like "devil".

      OR... maybe you're a dyslexic hillbilly and you meant "dawg". (I get those mixed up all the time, too.)

      OR... maybe you live in fear of God and you were trying to avoid a blasphemy rap when you stand at the Pearly Gates.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    2. Re:Reading too much into it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One example. I heard that Neo dies for 72 seconds before he comes back to represent the 72 hours (3 days) Jesus died.

      I'd have to agree that that's pretty weak reasoning. That's mainly because the Bible doesn't claim that 72 hours elapsed between the crucifixion and the resurrection! Basically, the crucifixion happened during the day on the day before the sabbath (Saturday), so Friday. And it seems Jesus died something at something like 9 hours after dawn ("ninth hour" in Biblical text means 9 hours after dawn). And the resurrection was discovered at dawn on the day after the sabbath, so on a Sunday morning. From dawn Friday to sawn Sunday is 48 hours; subtracting the 9 hours on Friday means it's more like 39 hours.

      Since I'm already so far off-topic, the 72 hours thing seems to come from a simplistic reading of "Jesus rose on the third day". It's actually an off-by-one error like you see all the time in programming. If you start a new job on Monday and don't get your phone hooked up until Wednesday, you got your phone hooked up "on the third day" (of work), right? But it's not 72 hours later; that would be on a Thursday.

    3. Re:Reading too much into it... by Ellen+Ripley · · Score: 1

      Hey, didn't Morpheus himself say "free your mind"?

      Actually, I think that was En Vogue.

    4. Re:Reading too much into it... by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Reloaded was interesting film for special effects but the plot is lacking. It is easy to write a seemingly complex plot if you are not constrained by having to make sense and story line contraditions just add to the mystic. No doubt aspiring intellects will spend more cpu cycles debating various apsects of the plot and dialog than the original authors did.

    5. Re:Reading too much into it... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Jesus wasn't dead for 72 hours anyway - the crucifiction took place during the day on Friday, and by Sunday morning the tomb was already empty.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  45. Re: YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHL. HA Terrible day. Fuckwit.

  46. not public internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check the screenshot. The IP address is 10.2.2.2, which is NOT a public IP address.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Line deleted from the original script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I know this. It's a Unix system!"

    1. Re:Line deleted from the original script by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 1

      Isn't that line from Jurassic Park shortly before showing the cutesy flat-shaded 3-d graphics of the "computer system"?

    2. Re:Line deleted from the original script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, certainly is. Jurassic Park's idea of a "UNIX System" was a rather snazzy series of on-the-fly modelled 3D cubes accompanied by seemingly random integer numbers...

      It seems the film industry is moving the right way to please us geeks...

    3. Re:Line deleted from the original script by RighteousFunby · · Score: 1

      The Jurassic Park thing was a UNIX system. It was running fsn (the file system navigator, but pronounced fusion) on an SGI box.

      Ha! The program is downloadable at SGIs site, methinks.

    4. Re:Line deleted from the original script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was the FUCKING POINT of him making that comment - fucking retard

  49. 10.2.2.2 by zdzichu · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They screwed. They've used IPv4 address for private networks.

    Why movie makers can use something more real?
    10.2.2.2 is not as bad as IP's from "The Net" with Sandra Bullock - xx.374.x.x is certainely not a valid address.
    10.x.x.x class was used in "Antitrust" to address satellites. Justified - they were on internal net for sure.
    But hacking from open net is not possible with that kind of address.
    I know that using real IPv4 address (like 66.35.250.150) is not desirable.
    But maybe not? Maybe WB should pay Michal Zalewski and have him secure some box, connect
    it to the internet and then use real IP address in movie? That would be fun - the box itself could store some unpublished photos or something like that, related to Matrix. Let's the hackers hack and give them something to hack for.

    My advice: next time you try to show some IP address, show some IPv6 address from class 324f::. Nobody wil be hacked and it will not look so much pathetic as 10.x.x.x

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:10.2.2.2 by TheDancer · · Score: 1

      Um.... she was hacking a box on the local network of the backup facilities. It is entriely plausiable--in fact likely that it was in private IP space. Think about it: If it were a publicly accesible IP address, then why have you fight your way into the building in order to use the network? Why not attack the target machine from Neo's old apartment or something.

      In fact if there were one machine out there that controlled the entire backup system to the power grid, I would be _extreamly_ surprised if it were in public IP space.

    2. Re:10.2.2.2 by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      You're so right. And while they're at it, they should stop using those silly 555- phone numbers. It's so unrealistic.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    3. Re:10.2.2.2 by TheShadow · · Score: 1

      Think of it as using a 555-xxxx phone number like they do on TV and in movies so that some Joe Schmoe doesn't sue the company because of all the phone calls he gets because of the movie.

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    4. Re:10.2.2.2 by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      The first screening of Matrix 2 Reloaded is here at Thursday 0.01 hour. I already downloaded bootleg, but I'm waiting to see the movie in cinema at premiere.

      So pardon me my ignorance, as I haven't yet seen matrix2.

      --
      :wq
    5. Re:10.2.2.2 by recursiv · · Score: 3, Funny

      Congrat-u-fucking-lations.

      You have determined that the controller for the power grid was on a private network. Maybe this explains the need for Trinity to infiltrate the lab to use a specific computer rather than any internet cafe. (hint: behind firewall)

      People like to talk a lot of shit about the matrix, but when you do it, you might as well make an argument that makes some small amount of sense.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    6. Re:10.2.2.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ignorance cannot be pardoned, you didn't see the movie yet, therefore you have no right to comment on it.

      She was hacking a private network, and therefore 10.x.x.x was perfectly valid.

      And even if it wasn't a private network, would you rather have them pick a random IP, which just so happens to be YOUR IP, and now thousands of h4x0r3z around the world try to break into your system?

      The 10.x.x.x space should be used in movies just like 555-xxxx phone numbers.

      Although a better idea would be for hollywood to buy their own netblock, use that for movies.. Maybe if you go to the IP seen in a movie, it'll be the movies homepage, or a secret page for the movie.

      Either way, this doesn't apply to matrix reloaded. Watch the movie then comment on its flaws.

    7. Re:10.2.2.2 by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone who complains about 555- numbers in movies should be forced to live in a home with two phone lines:

      8675309

      8535937

      ~Philly

    8. Re:10.2.2.2 by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      Although a better idea would be for hollywood to buy their own netblock, use that for movies.. Maybe if you go to the IP seen in a movie, it'll be the movies homepage, or a secret page for the movie.

      That's what I've suggested in my original comment.

      --
      :wq
  50. Theories and Spoilers by neema · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Off-topic on the nmap discussion, but on-topic as far the Matrix goes, here is something I just thought of. It's pack full of spoilers for reloaded and speculation about revolutions, so consider that your warning.

    SPOILERS AND SPECULATION FOLLOW:

    Now, the theory that Zion is really a matrix within a matrix has been floating around and I happen to agree with it. The premise of the movie, I think, is that not only is Neo "The One" from the first layer of the matrix (which was exposed in the first movie), but happens also to be the small percentage that becomes "The One" in the second layer of the matrix, something the machines didn't count on.

    As for him having to make a decision between saving Trinity and saving mankind, I don't think he's gotten to the choice yet and that will come in revolutions. The Architect said that the expulsion of humans from the first matrix servered a purpose for the machines, so, theoretically, perhaps Morpheus, Trinity and the rest of them are actually computer programs, to assist moving the dissident population of the first layer of the matrix to the second layer. Of course, there is a possibility they are not aware of their own existance. This would explain Morpheus' adamant belief in "The One" (it's been programmed in him). Of course, Neo's love for Trinity complicates things and I think that will be the choice in the third matrix. He will have to decide between destroying this second layer of the matrix, which would destroy Trinity the computer program too, or preserving it because of his love for her.

    Feel free to point out flaws, because I'd really appreciate that.

    1. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Jason+H.+Smith · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just got back from my third viewing tonight. It took that many times for all that architect talk to sink in. A few thoughts...

      First, AFAICT, they are definitely still in the Matrix. The architect is intentionally difficult to follow, but I think his point was, the 99% acceptance rate is nice, but something must be done with those who do not accept. And the answer is simply have the Matrix make them think they busted out. Also, there's no need for any meta-Matrix, as the first Matrix could easily simulate the escape. Think chroot vs. user-mode Linux. But that's a small point.

      If you watch again, you will notice the Merelvengian (sp) say that Neo's predecessors had much more respect, and also that he has survived those predecessors, and he will survive Neo. But that's all said before you know what he means. But what I got is that eventually, the shit hits the fan, and they just reboot the whole damned thing every hundred years or so (not a bad uptime).

      Also, unlike you, I think he made the choice. Neo chose not to go to the source. At first, I thought this was weird, because the Neos on TV did the same. I thought this was the previous recordings (i.e. all 6 made the same choice); but after watching again, it looks like the TVs are showing now, not the past. That makes sense. This is the first time Neo made the wrong choice. I'm thinking this fits the Hollywood formula pretty well. The previous 5 Neos were simply benevolent mankind-lovers; but this time, we get the predictable theme that love conquers all or such.

      I thought it was pretty cool, but the plot is treading into dangerous ground. When you start blurring reality with dreams, you're walking on cheesy, overused deus ex machina storylines. It's easy to get lame and make crap. E.g. look at how dumb Existenz ended up being. But then, I liked Total Recall, so there is hope for a great finale.

      So I think there's still a lot up for grabs. Since Zion and the war are still a computer simulation, for all we know, there might not even be a war going on at all! Although there probably is, since it wouldn't be very Hollywood to just handwave away two movies worth of bad guys.

      Anyway, I'm thinking now that they know they're still in the matrix, perhaps the people in Zion will start breaking the rules and have some actual means of fighting the approaching machine army? Or maybe they'll all just pop up a level, leaving the machine army there to twiddle their thumbs.

    2. Re:Theories and Spoilers by OmniVector · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ****SPOILER ALERT****

      I think the best explination i've heard, or at least the one I like the most, is someone said Neo is really just a computer program too. The purpose of Neo, and the whole reason 5 different versions of him have existed alreay, is to try and find the "perfect" AI. The Matrix is really run by humans, the the humans are trying to find a version of Neo that will truely be human enough to be considedered actual AI.

      If you remember where Trinity types in her password to crack the power system, Z1ON0101, the binary 0101 translates to 5. Is Trinity aware of this being the 5th incarnation through the fact that she too is just a computer program or is this just odd coincidence?

      For the people who say the 2nd was too much action, and not enough plot i think it was twice the plot and action... This second one raises a lot more mindfuck questions.

      --
      - tristan
    3. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Demanche · · Score: 1

      i agree completly - The first movie was all cozy and left you feeling good about the movie. The second one just plays with your mind about the first movie and leaves you on the edge of your seat. I don't think i can help from speculating about the 3rd movie for the next 6 months ;) If the movies ending turns out to be a disapointing 3rd turn in the plot i will be very disapointed ! heh -Dem

      --
      Mod me down im a newf (wiki)
    4. Re:Theories and Spoilers by gadwale · · Score: 0

      Also of interest:

      Towards the end, Neo and gang are informed that the machines (sentinels?) kept digging after killing all the inhabitants of Zion. Where were they digging to?

      Of course, this could just be a blooper...

      Adi Gadwale.

    5. Re:Theories and Spoilers by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Here's some more SPOILERS and more speculation based on the parent post. I speculate that there isn't a second layer of the Matrix, but that a major theme of the movie was that Machines and Humans have to coexist somehow... There were references in the movie about Agent Smith feeling Neo and at the end, Neo is shown to have some control over the machines in the "real" world. Well, given the name "Neo" meaning "new" and the themes of the machine/man thing, I think Neo is the prototype or link for the coexistance of man and machine. There were lots of references to Neo being still "only human" and I think Revolutions will have Neo embracing his machine half.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    6. Re:Theories and Spoilers by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      "Humans define their existence through misery and suffering."

      What better way to define this than a war they can't win? In a world in which resources are scarce, where everything is second-hand and used up? A post-apocalyptic nightmare world where you have to eat single-celled proteins that taste like a big bowl o'snot? It feels so much more real than a world where we're more or less comfortable all the time, where all you have to do to survuve is be on time for work, go to church, and pay your taxes. So real, in fact, that it would make no sense to try to escape. After all, we all want something to fight for. A cause to live for and to die protecting. Something to be truly passionate about.

      However, Neo now realizes that he's being lied to about his very existence. Again. It won't come as nearly as much of a shock to him now. But it means that although he was able to make the irrational decision of saving the girl he loves over the entire rest of humanity, and his love for that girl is supposed to keep him from destroying the last layer of the matrix, the knowledge that it's all bullshit (again) will drive him to be truly free.

      By the way, I don't think Morpheus et al are computer programs, Neo would notice that when they were in the matrix. The 21st century one that is.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    7. Re:Theories and Spoilers by hellswraith · · Score: 1

      Neo means new, but also the letters make up the word 'one'. Something to ponder. These movies kick ass.

    8. Re:Theories and Spoilers by daegol · · Score: 1
      I think the best explination i've heard, or at least the one I like the most, is someone said Neo is really just a computer program too.

      One thing that could support this speculation is the fact that Neo now has super powers outside of the matrix (in the meta-matrix, if you will). As far as we know, the only people who can have super powers within the matrix are either computer programs or people hacking in from outside.
    9. Re:Theories and Spoilers by grammar+nazi · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that the whole humans as a powerplant need not be true if the Zion (reality) part of the matrix is just another part of the matrix. This raises the question, why are the humans trapped inside the matrix? Do humans exist at all?

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    10. Re:Theories and Spoilers by gordyf · · Score: 1

      My understanding of this is that the Zion army or whatever went up to attack the diggers, but an EMP went off early and disabled most of the Zion guys before they could attack... so the diggers slaughtered the army that was sent out, not Zion itself.

    11. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think the best explination i've heard, or at least the one I like the most, is someone said Neo is really just a computer program too. The purpose of Neo, and the whole reason 5 different versions of him have existed alreay, is to try and find the "perfect" AI.

      Probably this post is what you're referring to?

    12. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Wingnut64 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I thought too. The only survivor (who we can guess triggered the EMP because he was left alive by the machines) was the same guy who almost knifed Neo in the beginning.

      --
      echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
    13. Re:Theories and Spoilers by nivedita · · Score: 1

      The way I understood the choice was that either Neo can go to the Source, destroy the matrix, which will kill everyone plugged into it at the time, while the machines destroy Zion, thus exterminating all of humanity, or go through the other door back into the matrix, but it will be too late to save Zion anyway. That's why the architect talks about hope: all the other Neo's hoped to prevent the destruction of Zion, planning to come back and fight the Source another day, but this one went back into the matrix to save Trinity alone.

    14. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Pr0xY · · Score: 1

      incorrect, anyone can manipulate the matrix as they are all connected with the same mechanisms (pirate signal is just a means to connect, but they still use same interface).

      think bout the little kids at the oracles place, they weren't hacking anything :P

      proxy

    15. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Drakonian · · Score: 1
      ****SPOILERS CONTINUE****

      I'm starting to agree with that. The idea has sort of been bugging me that all this amazing technology including extensive CG was used to make the Matrix trilogy but the whole point is we are FIGHTING the machines? I think some sort of cooperation with the machines is more likely and mroe of a happy ending. More facts to support this:

      • The kiss with Persephone. She seemed to be testing his AI. And it was pretty good.
      • The discussion with the Oracle where she implies that there needs to be a balance between man and machine.
      • The discussion witht he councillor where he says we depend on the machines and they depend on us. I haven't seen any discussions on Slashdot on this but I thought it was very telling

      In conclusion, I think Revolutions will show that there is some level of cooperation required between man and machine. It isn't really a war, they depend on each other.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    16. Re:Theories and Spoilers by daegol · · Score: 1

      Ah, good point

    17. Re:Theories and Spoilers by ender81b · · Score: 1

      except that the architect says "despite being changed you remain irrevocably human." The machines haven't outright lied to anyone yet so the presumption is that he is still human.

    18. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      The Architect says he is human (even mentions chemical receptors). The French guy says he is just a man. All signs point to his being human.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    19. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Necromancyr · · Score: 1

      Something no one has mentioned yet about this - maybe there IS no war between man and machines. Yeah, thats been mentioned. But maybe there was a war between men, and they destroyed the world and 'scorched the sky'. Basically a nuclear holocaust. The machines, programmed to never hurt and always try to save man, created the matrix and placed survivors in there 'protected' from the harshness of the real world and to prevent them from being able to actually ever destroy themselves. Or maybe it's the robots trying to recreate humanity. Just some ideas floating in my brain.

    20. Re:Theories and Spoilers by fname · · Score: 1

      OK, SPOILER!!!!

      I see 3 possibilites for Zion:

      1) Zion is real
      2) Zion is another level of the Matrix
      3) Zion is real, but Neo is now stuck in a Matrix that simulates Zion.

      I have no idea which one it is, but I hope it is (1), because (2) seems like too much of a cop-out (the whole movie was fake! Well, Of course the movie is fake, but the premise of the movie is that it's a fantasy. Get it! Get it!). (3) would be interesting, but I don't think it could really fit in with the Matrix universe.

      Now, before Neo goes all pssing-out, he makes a comment, "Something's different this time," puts his hand up and all the squiddies blow up. So what's different? Is he now tapped into the computer mind? Or has he just realized that Zion is part of the matrix, and this is how he blows up the squiddies. But, maybe he didn't destroy them, maybe the other ship sent an EM charge-- that's unclear. We're supposed to think he stops them, but it might be a case of bait-and-switch.

      Here's my theory. Whether Zion is real or not is mostly irrelevant. Neo is experiencing Deja Vu, and he makes a connection to his last 5 lives. Suddenly, as he's about to be killed by the squiddies, he realizes that something is different from the last 5 lives. What's different-- Agent Smith! He didn't have the same transformation in the Zion 1.0-5.0, but it's different this time. Maybe the last 5 times, Neo picks his survivors (how many people are left from the two ships Neo is with), and they restart Zion.

      Anyways, since the scene w/ the architect is clearly designed to shake things and make you look at the Matrix (esp. The Oracle) in a new light, it's very cleverly designed for repeat viewing. I bet Reloaded would have made a lot more sense if we we knew the 6.0 thing at the start.

    21. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Kirijini · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think Neo and Trinity are programs.

      I think the idea that Neo is a project to develop AI is interesting, but in that case, no one else can be a program, because then they would also require AI, and if Neo is the project to develop AI... then...? those ideas are mutually exclusive.

      I don't think that Trinity and Neo are programs, simply because they fall in love. That's a stereotypical non-machine thing to do.

      Morpheus, however, very well could be a program. Think about it - Morpheus's role must always be fulfilled in each iteration of the Matrix. He has a singular purpose - to find Neo, train him, make him believe in the prophecy, and then fulfill it. Everyone else - Trinity, Niobe, the council, Tank, Dozer, Cypher, etc. are all just peripheral roles that could be done by anyone. Neo, due to his nature as the One, may or may not be a program, though I think he isn't. Without Morpheus, no one would believe the prophecy, and consquently, the One (which I just now realize is an anagram of Neo. Feel kinda stupid about that) would never be found. Therefore, Morpheus is required for the cycle, just as are the Oracle and Keymaker.

    22. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      >Neo's love for Trinity complicates things

      Trinity Shminity. Persephone is so hot, I need to add a liquid cooler to this puter.

      Theory: Trinity is a program created by Persephone. When Neo realizes the real world was also a sham, he'll have Persephone as his lover.

    23. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      I thought it was pretty cool, but the plot is treading into dangerous ground. When you start blurring reality with dreams, you're walking on cheesy, overused deus ex machina storylines

      Could be worse.. They could be putting Chewbacca in Revolutions ;-)

      Incidently, you have to give props to the Wachowski brothers for not selling out. They stuck with a plot that they probably figured was going to be R rated and didn't try to cut back. That's more than I can say for Lucas' allegedly
      "dark" rendition of Episode II.

    24. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Habberhead · · Score: 1

      We are going to find Neo waking up from in front of his computer, with his headphones still on and drool all over the desk.

      Just as Alice woke up at the end of Wonderland, this is all just a dream for Mr Anderson.

    25. Re:Theories and Spoilers by subnet-zero · · Score: 1
      I think the best explination i've heard, or at least the one I like the most, is someone said Neo is really just a computer program too.

      The old "Is Dekkard a Replicant?" dilemmea, eh?

      I think, in Revolutions, while Neo is at Zion, in the "Real World," someone will tell him everything around him is an illusion, offer him a blue pill or red pill, he takes the red pill and next thing you know, he finds out he's actually a Cray sitting in Sandia natl. labs. At which point everyone in America storms the box office and demands their money back for all three movies.

    26. Re:Theories and Spoilers by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      I don't think that line was a blooper.

      There were a couple of items in the movie that pointed to 'something else':

      - The diggers kept digging

      - The french lady said something about "when we arrived here" as if they came from somewhere else, and Trinity and Morpheus exchanged a curious look.

      - The Architect answered just about every point brought up by Neo, but when Neo mantioned the Oracle, and the Architect responded something like "Psaw. Please...", but didn't give a good explanation for her existance.

      - The next movie is plural: RevolutionS , so the humans revolt and ???

      - There are other powerful entities within the Matrix who have nothing to do with the agents, and are quite human: they are very emotional, have egos, etc. Why are they in the Matrix?

      Also, the whole storyline mostly revolves around the Matrix. What's happening in the rest of the real-world/metamatrix. All we've seen so far is Zion, some tunnels, some ruined cities, and the diggers. But presumably, there's some sort of computer life out in the "realworld" for some reason. What are all the batteries used for?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    27. Re:Theories and Spoilers by MyHair · · Score: 1
      Feel free to point out flaws, because I'd really appreciate that.
      • You're fly's unzipped
      • You snore too loudly
      • You'rea little big around the iddle
      • You pick your nose too much
      • You leave the toilet seat up
      • You don't spend enough time with me
      • You never listen
      • You take verything I say too literally
    28. Re:Theories and Spoilers by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I had the same understanding about the foreward ambush force being wiped out, but there were scenes showing one or two Squiddie Sentinels in a place that looked a hell of a lot like a dark Zion when they were rapidly switching scenes.

      The guy at the end: It didn't show him long enough, but for a while after the movie I thought it was Cypher which was a total mindf***, but obviously Trinity would've recognized him.

      Then again, perhas this iteration of the Matrix is different than the first movie. I don't recall any explanation of what happened after the first movie when he called someone and told them "I'm going to show these people a new world, a world without you. Where we go from there is up to you." (or something like that) I took it to mean a massive instantaneous Matrix-wide change, but we're led to believe they've just been yanking people out at a faster pace for 6 months.

      New idea for me: perhaps 'the machines' are trying to determine all possible 'outputs' from a human given the input, and they're close since the Oracle can predict the future, but they're not quite there yet because Neo and the gang still do unexpected stuff. Perhaps the computers fail to realize the futility of controlling/predicting a human, or perhaps we fail to realize how preprogrammed we are.

    29. Re:Theories and Spoilers by JWhitlock · · Score: 1
      If you remember where Trinity types in her password to crack the power system, Z1ON0101, the binary 0101 translates to 5. Is Trinity aware of this being the 5th incarnation through the fact that she too is just a computer program or is this just odd coincidence?

      There are lots of instances of 101 - It shows up as room numbers, floor numbers. Well, maybe only five instances.

    30. Re:Theories and Spoilers by windlord · · Score: 1

      - There are other powerful entities within the Matrix who have nothing to do with the agents, and are quite human: they are very emotional, have egos, etc. Why are they in the Matrix?

      Sounds like a big IRC network with the "powerful" entities with big egos, emotions being the script kiddies and the ircopers. Maybe the Matrix is just one big MMPOG. End of 3rd episode, theres a pwipe, everyone unplugs and says "Good Game"

    31. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Vip · · Score: 1

      "Trinity types in her password to crack the power system, Z1ON0101"

      Zion is the last human city.
      101 appears in MANY places throughout the first two
      movies. It is Neo's apartment number in the first
      film. It is a highway in the second, the one with
      the battle. It is the room number of the restaurant.
      And so on...101 has a meaning. Anyone care to
      "symbolize" it?

      Vip

    32. Re:Theories and Spoilers by neema · · Score: 1

      "think bout the little kids at the oracles place, they weren't hacking anything :P"

      Of course, if the Oracle is part of the Architect's plan (yet to be confirmed, but suspected) with her propagation of the theory of "The One" and the prophecy and so on, then maybe those kids were part of it too.

    33. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just more hacker speak for LOL.

      Trinity is really just a fat 35 year old man in an AOL chatroom.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    34. Re:Theories and Spoilers by jtdubs · · Score: 1

      By the way, I don't think Morpheus et al are computer programs, Neo would notice that when they were in the matrix.

      Why do you think that? He certainly didn't notice that the Oracle and her bodyguard were programs...

      Justin Dubs

    35. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Morrigu · · Score: 1

      s/Merelvengian/Merovingian/g

      See http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/Rulers/merovingian. html for some historical details. They're a line of Frankish kings from the early Dark Ages, and became known for their long greasy hair, corruption and uselessness before Charles "The Hammer" Martel, Pepin the Short, and Charlemagne cleaned house in Western Europe.

      --
      "We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - Major Mike Shearer, UK
    36. Re:Theories and Spoilers by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 1

      101 is also the highway near where they filmed the movie in California.

      The freeway scene was however an entirely faked freeway.

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
    37. Re:Theories and Spoilers by dmachine · · Score: 1

      I also like that theory, but I don't think it would translate well to film. Still a fun theory to kick around though. However, I was wondering if anyone else noticed the prominence of "101". I was actually looking for things that had "110" since I was expecting to see a lot of "6" since it's the sixth and dismissed the few "101"s I saw as just not related, but now that I think about it, maybe the "5" is more significant than the "6". The other prominent places of "101" are the freeway, and the when they reach the elevator to speak with merevingian.

      --
      You've got a lot to learn before you can beat me. Try again, kiddo! (ha ha ha!)
    38. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trinity's not software. Morpheus isn't software. Neo, on the other hand, is. Near the end of Matrix:Revolutions, maybe right after Neo's vanquished the Smiths and cleared the way for all the real humans (in Zion and elsewhere) to escape from the Matrix, they'll be a really long mushy scene where Trinity's all "*sob* I'll always remember you, Neo. I'll always love you..." and Neo's all "Whoa! Am I acting stoic, or just stupid?", then Morpheus will come up, give Neo a handshake, and say "Well, we're going to go break some machines. Sucks about you being software...", to which Neo will reply "Yeah, I know. Whoa."

    39. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Kredal · · Score: 1

      He noticed that the bodyguard at least was different... he was yellow lines of code, not the green of his surroundings/everything else.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    40. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Kredal · · Score: 1

      The guy at the end:

      He was seen in 3 other scenes in the movie. Look for him next time you watch it. Short hair, and a beard...

      1. Smith takes him over in the matrix, and answers the phone

      2. Tries to convince Lock to be one of the two ships to look for the oracle

      3. Tries to sneak up on Neo and co. and kill him with the knife.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    41. Re:Theories and Spoilers by MyHair · · Score: 1

      That seems to be the consensus, but the guy had so little screen time and his face was upside-down relative to the audience at the end that I didn't recognize him...I just saw an upside-down goatee and thought "Cypher", but I'm bad with names and faces anyway.

      I recall his previous two scenes, although I'm not sure he was trying to kill Neo. We were obviously supposed to believe that for tension build-up, but either he changed his mind at the last second or was trying to get his blood on Neo (perhaps a human virus or, as a usenet poster suggested, program Neo with brain-chemical-altering-stuff; but he did seem to get a little blood on his uncut hand and then shake Neo's) or was just being curious about pain and then Neo.

      And now that I think about it, if this were a different iteration of the Matrix than the first move then Neo & co wouldn't know Smith, because he appears to be freed in his own way and as I understand the Matrix universe would not be erased or reset when the Matrix reloads, and if he were freed in a previous load then Neo wouldn't know him.

      If they can avoid breaking their own rules in Matrix Revolutions and avoid anything lame like "it's all a dream" or "it's all meaningless" then the last movie will be really kick-ass.

    42. Re:Theories and Spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When you start blurring reality with dreams, you're walking on cheesy, overused deus ex machina storylines"

      Not once but twice the day is saved by flying Neo swooping in and nabbing other imperilled heros in the veritable nick of time, and you're only starting to worry they might resort to deus ex machina? ;)

    43. Re:Theories and Spoilers by THE+ROCK · · Score: 1

      Computers don't start counting from one, they start counting from zero. The number 5 is actually the sixth element in a set of integers starting at zero.

      Nobody else seems to remember this...

    44. Re:Theories and Spoilers by daeley · · Score: 1
      Room 101 is where Winston Smith is taken in 1984:

      'You asked me once,' said O'Brien, 'what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.'
      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  51. "Alias" by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The "Alias" series on TV also features quite realistic computer manipulation. SSH, "ping -f", traceroutes, recompiles, etc...

    They pushed realism quite far: in one particular episode (can't remember the name, but this scene takes place in Mexico), one of the agents goes undercover as a DJ, and uses an iBook (macs are popular among musicians and DJ's) instead of his PC laptop, for more realism... Cool :)

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    1. Re:"Alias" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also transferring state secrets via Audiogalaxy.

    2. Re:"Alias" by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the song was, IIRC, was "Serious JUJU", by Sammy Hagar. That episode also featured Marshall writing a Pong game, in assembler, in KDE. I have the entire second season on Video CD, but I'm too tired right now to look though them to find the number and title. :P

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    3. Re:"Alias" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but there was one episode where Jack Bristow got some data off of a "secure server." The command he issued was something like:

      ftp som.ebo.gus.ip

      type supersecretfile.txt

      etc...

      My wife said I should email them and offer my services for technical accuracy.

  52. No one to blame but themselves... by sdo1 · · Score: 1

    If anyone is reading an article on Slashdot about The Matrix without having seen the movie gets what they deserve. If they don't want to be spoiled, they should avoid reading these articles. I'd rather people be responsible for their own actions.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:No one to blame but themselves... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      If anyone is reading an article on Slashdot about The Matrix without having seen the movie gets what they deserve. If they don't want to be spoiled, they should avoid reading these articles. I'd rather people be responsible for their own actions.

      Sorry, but no. It's long been proper netiquette to put an generic subject line and include at least 1 full page of whitespace following something like "*** SPOILERS BELOW!!! ***". Just because most Usenet traffic has migrated to Blogs doesn't make it any less relevent. That's as lame as putting something like "OMFG LONE GUNMEN DIE IN FINAL X-FILES EPISODE AIRED 5 MINUTES AGO EST!!!!" Oh right, Slashdot did that.

    2. Re:No one to blame but themselves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has never been proper netiquette to use all caps or whitespace in your posts.

      It is proper netiquette to assume responsibility on behalf of your potential readership.

    3. Re:No one to blame but themselves... by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah. Slashdotters observe proper netiquette. And put a whole page of whitespace into your post and watch your post get modded to -1 in about three seconds.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
  53. Script Kiddie in PVC by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    : Oh, and I must say, that Trinity freakin' kicks ass. As you can see from the pictures [insecure.org], nmap says "No exact OS matches for host". Trinity goes ahead and throws the sploit anyway without knowing the system's architecture AND IT WORKS!

    Well, I suppose the PVC-encased chick script kiddie is better than non...

  54. Re:Did you even watch the 2nd movie? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    It's time for people to shut up about the "humans as a power supply" deal.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  55. IP's for movies by quark2universe · · Score: 1

    There are many comments that say the 10.2.2.2 is not reachable from the open net. Okay, what we need is for someone to buy a Class C IP range, never assign any of those IP addresses to any machine, and then announce to film makers that they can safely use any of those addresses in their movies. That should settle the need for IP's in movies without using private addresses or invalid ones.

    --

    Believe in things of which no person has ever learned
    1. Re:IP's for movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the fact is, she WAS NOT on the open net. She just blew everything up trying to break into the inside of the power plant. Why is it so far fetched that they use private IP addresses? The whole complaint is moot because it makes perfect sense the way it was done in the first place.

    2. Re:IP's for movies by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      but movies want realism - having a power grid on a closed private network would make lots of sense. Get to utilize lots of new technology for management and dont have to worry about an attack from outside. I would wager a large power company like that wouldnt even have it connected to the internet anywhere since that would be too big a security risk.

  56. Silly comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two mistaken complainets that EVERYONE seems to be making:

    1- She was fully justified in using 10.x.x.x address. After all, she was on the INSIDE of the power plant, not the open net. Why go through all the trouble of breaking into the plant if she wasn't obviously going to be on their private network.

    2- She was INSIDE the matrix, so it was present time 1999-2000, not hundreds of years into the future. Exploiting vulverable ssh servers is not far fetched in the present day.

    You people need to go watch the movie again.

  57. duh. If you thought slashdot effect was bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they put a private IP in this number the whole octet would need to be abandoned. This is analogous to using the fictional 555 prefix used for all phone numbers.

    Then again...what's the ip for the RIAA?

  58. Someone knew what they were doing by bluenirve · · Score: 1

    better than in "The Net", where the ip could never happen (xxx.3xx.xxx.xxx)...

    1. Re:Someone knew what they were doing by Junta · · Score: 1

      That could have well been intentional, ala the 555-xxxx phone numbers. I've seen a number of mass media things use invalid IP addresses, and though I have seen no one say anything, I have always assumed they just wanted to make sure they didn't use an address actually used by a valid system, as to reduce liability.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Someone knew what they were doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you ever seen a movie where they gave out a phone number, and it was 555-xxxx? Those can never happen either. It's exactly the same thing, and I for one appreciated them not using some random valid IP address. (It's been 20+ years -- has the phone company even considered putting 867-5309 back into service? Probably not...)

  59. Anyone notice this in Xmen 2? by rsax · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help notice that they used a really cool looking customized version of Mac OS X (atleast that's what it looked like) when Mystique infiltrated the government building to retrieve a couple secret documents. Does anyone have any screenshots of that?

    1. Re:Anyone notice this in Xmen 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that was a pretty standard GNOME2 theme.

  60. Damn script kiddies. by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2, Funny

    She's got sense enough to use a sploit, but she chooses a feeble password like Z1ON0101. Come ON, Trin, only 2 character classes, only 8 characters ? -sigh-

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    1. Re:Damn script kiddies. by petong · · Score: 1
      She's got sense enough to use a sploit, but she chooses a feeble password like Z1ON0101. Come ON, Trin, only 2 character classes, only 8 characters ? -sigh-


      Unless your unix system is using MD5 passwords, it will only accept 8 chars max. And it is not like she is trying to choose a secure password, she is hacking the box, not locking it down. jeez..

    2. Re:Damn script kiddies. by evilmuffins · · Score: 0

      Yea, she should have used my super secure password, 1234

    3. Re:Damn script kiddies. by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Ha! My password is an order of magnitude harder to crack...

      12345

      Shoot, now I have to change my password.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  61. Top 50 Reasons why the matrix sucked!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LoL just saw this site while browsing the web, its hilarious!
    http://matrix.techshock.net

  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. If they by netwalkr · · Score: 1

    would have been using IPv6 Trinity might not have accessed the system so easily. However, Link could have uploaded her more advanced hacking techniques so no matter how you look at it she was getting in.

  64. Nerds & Geeks notice these things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course a movie like Matrix Reloaded is going to go through the trouble of hiring consultants. It is imperative that they get those all-important 1/2 second screenshots correct. If they got it wrong, they would have a backlash on their hands. Or would they? I wonder... it may give a lot of fans a feeling of superiority and make them like it that much more.

  65. Theories and Spoilers by Demanche · · Score: 2, Interesting

    *SPOILER BELOW: continued reading forfits all rights and spoiler bashing ;)*

    I agreee with your insights.. something is definatly strange about the entire last scene of the movie.

    One thing I believe that may have slipped in on your observations is that in the end of the movie - Neo can feel the machienes. The first matrix was about the ability to go beyond relaity, and to move past the possible (in a pysical sense). This looks like the next matrix will evolve more so then the previous. Neo does not seem to have superpowers - but his instinct told him something about the machienes.

    Also.. the guy next to him in the bed. Remember in the begining - the agent goes through the phone after turning into an agent? I'm speculating that programs have the ability to go into different parts of the matrix..

    Ever wonder if the second matrix (what they think is them outside of the matrix) is just a test to see if anyone can ever break the matrix - and everyone who thinks they have broken free of the matrix are still actually in the matrix?

    Perhapds the machines digging are a futureistic anti-virus programs just taking their own representation in the "real life" matrix?

    The third movie is definatly going to get my money on opening night ;)

    Comments, opinions? Insights!!? Please tell ;)

    --
    Mod me down im a newf (wiki)
  66. Speaking of hacking, the game dropped the ball... by gmezero · · Score: 1

    Or I should more accurately say the the guys hosting the supporting websites dropped the ball.

    I just picked up the "Enter the Matrix" video game and while the video game itself is so-so, the "hacking" portion was almost more fun than the rest of the game. My problem is that while you're digging around at this console, you get several URLs as leads to follow for more information.

    Well guess what, none of them, not one single damn one of this is up and running, prepared to receive the traffic from this game. I've already written Redpill.com and complained (since they seem to be the one responsible for the sites). But the mood is already blown... grrr... ...so let me see, how hard is it to put up a friggen website on time? Rememind me to never consider hiring these clowns for anything mission critical.

  67. Dork! by jabber01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This spoils nothing but the first film.

    The statute of limitation on spoliers runs out once the film shows up at Blockbuster.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  68. So you're the bastard... by HardCase · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...who's always talking during the movie. Hey, do you have a cell phone too? And a beeper? Maybe a crying child or two?


    All of this managed to make my Matrix experience just that much harder to enjoy.


    -h-

    1. Re:So you're the bastard... by Trevalyx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, minus the little hellians and the beeper, that's me. Sometimes I bring my laptop along in anticipation that there are going to be a few dull scenes. Though I try to keep conference calls on my phone with tons of flashy multicolored lights to a minimum after credits, sometimes it just happens, ya know? Also, I always always carry bang-snaps to movies. They're to throw at people who complain. The firecrackers are for people who complain twice. Roman candles for anyone who dares go beyond that.

    2. Re:So you're the bastard... by Foundryman · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize the BOFH ever had time to attend movies...

    3. Re:So you're the bastard... by dimator · · Score: 1

      All of this managed to make my Matrix experience just that much harder to enjoy

      How interesting. In my case, the shitty movie made my Matrix experience harder to enjoy!

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    4. Re:So you're the bastard... by Trevalyx · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's easy. I'm a freelance BOFH. A currently out of work BOFH, looking for a summer job in the Philadelphia area, actually. Anyway, I have more time to see movies that way. I thought Reloaded warranted the $7 rather than just seeing it on my computer a couple of days early. As I said, I didn't have time to go to anything but the 1AM showing, so my time IS precious.. I just don't sleep, heh.

    5. Re:So you're the bastard... by catfood · · Score: 1

      I saw the original Matrix movie in Pittsburgh with a bunch of attendees from Yet Another Perl Conference. Having perhaps 80% of the seats at that showing, we managed to turn it into the geek version of Rocky Horror. I feel bad for the other 20%.... something blows up on Neo, a voice in the audience yells, "Aaaah! You didn't use strict and hyphen-w!" and the crowd breaks up laughing.

      I bet there were a lot of refunds that night for the 20%.

      Fun though.

  69. Hush! That's what Revolutions is all about! by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    Damned spoilers!

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  70. Rent "The 13th Floor" by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    That's the plot - ooops, sorry - and you won't have to wait until Fall and spend $8.50 to see Revolutions.

    My theory is a little different. Remember the Dungeons & Dragons movie, which was crap, unless you viewed it as the imaginary experience of a 13 year old boy and girl, playing AD&D.

    Well, that's the Matrix trilogy, only with 16 year olds, playing Shadowrun.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

    1. RE: Rent "The 13th Floor" by Demanche · · Score: 1

      I actually watched that movie - the plot was ok ... .. it wasn't the matrix.. :D Besides.. by using the ending they used.. they can almost guarentee that everyone that say the second part of the movie. Was I the only one really mad when they ended the movie like that!? :0 -Dem

      --
      Mod me down im a newf (wiki)
  71. Re:SSH: security through obscurity? - NOPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbass, can you read? He said he knows about the exploits, but they're not public. He's witholding information from the public about other explots that only he knows about.

  72. How did they get the screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooooops..

    Gotta love video piracy. Nice going 'security' guys.

  73. My new password ... by LoudMusic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will NOT be Z1ON0101. However, I will be adding that to my dictionaries (:

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  74. 10.2.2.2/555-1234 by jearbear · · Score: 1

    I'm actually guessing that, like having to use 555 for phone numbers in movies so that they don't match any real phone number, the usage of 10.2.2.2 was to so that it would not match an ip address in the real world. I mean, can you imagine having the IP that was shown being hacked by Trinity the day after scores of both real geeks and script kiddies went to see Reloaded. Holy shit, man! You could kiss your data goodbye, and a lawsuit of Reloaded hello.

    OTOH, it would have been hilarious if they used 127.0.0.1 - not from a practical standpoint - that just would have been lame - but more from a "Sound of thousands of ignorant script-kiddies writhing in pain as they realized the box they just completely fucked up was their own" standpoint.

  75. Come on, people by Ezubaric · · Score: 2, Informative


    How can this guy get modded up for being insightful when he doesn't know the name of a major player in the film?

    The Merovingian dynasty was the first kingdom of France to emerge from the ruins of the Roman empire, led by Clovis I. Unlike most ruling families in Europe, though, it's not named after it's founding member. Or I guess you could say it is, since "Merovec" is considered to be a half sea-monster. This gives the cruel character a little more depth ...

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    1. Re:Come on, people by Jason+H.+Smith · · Score: 1

      It got moderated as interesting, not insightful.

      But thanks for the history lesson.

    2. Re:Come on, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper moderation for an informative post is "informative".

      P.S. Do you realize that with your nick, you could reach +5 funny in any Matrix thread by pretending to be an agent on slashdot?

  76. isn't it easier... by gol64738 · · Score: 1

    i've noticed that many poeple still use the -l username when specifying a username when using ssh.

    isn't it easier (and just make more sense) to do ssh username@host rather than ssh host -l username?

    1. Re:isn't it easier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Cleaner, maybe, but why would it be easier? If you've been using Unix for a while, "-l" is deeeeeeply ingrained in your brain from they days when rsh was the way. Plus, "user@host" is clearer, but they're about equally easy to type. (The number of keystrokes differs by one, but with the "@" you have to do overlapping keystrokes (chording), which is harder.)

    2. Re:isn't it easier... by dsb3 · · Score: 1

      Even though I rather suspect your question is rhetorical in nature I'll answer it.

      For me, I log into multiple hosts under several different accounts (one userid per role, per application, whatever).

      To make best use of command line history it's far more effective to:

      1) ssh hostname -l user1
      2) up-cursor ctrl-w user2
      3) lather, rinse, repeat.

      If I used the user@hostname form I could certainly use the ^user1^user2 syntax but I've already doubled my keystrokes.

      I must say, though, that intermixing ssh with scp makes the more universal @ format more appealing, since scp uses -l for rate limiting, not for login id.

      --

      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    3. Re:isn't it easier... by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      1. using '-l' is good when you've already typed the IP and forgotten to type the username.
      2. if they used username@host, the complete idiots would think it was an email and try emailing it.

      --
      Luke-Jr
  77. The site admins must have M$ day jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why? Because the site advertises 50 reasons, but only 20 are available right now... and releasing an unfinished product to the public is something Microsoft does! All that was missing was the click-through EULA.

  78. Why? by Junta · · Score: 1

    Why not just accept invalid IP addresses? Is it *really* so horrible? Designating a range of addresses to never be used is extremely wasteful. I can see maybe keeping addresses under 300 per octet (253 isn't as mindgrabbingly obvious as 332 for example), but to set aside perfectly good addresses for this is silly. Maybe with IPv6 it would work (but even then, would someone notice a single 'H' character in place of one of the hex digits? I'm not talking about taking screen captures and scrutinizing an address, but with a IPv6 shown momentarily, a single invalid hex character would work well), but IPv4 is rather crowded...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Why? by quark2universe · · Score: 1

      Why is it so silly? The phone company did it with the 555 prefix.

      --

      Believe in things of which no person has ever learned
    2. Re:Why? by ehetzner · · Score: 1

      555-xxxx is reserved for phone company use, not film use. It is the moral equivalent of 10.x.x.x. Sheesh. The film companies don't yet have everybody in their pockets.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      253 isn't as mindgrabbingly obvious as 332 for example
      Especially since it is below 255

  79. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best description of that I have ever seen.

  80. Neo is indeed a program. by LibertineR · · Score: 1
    So are Trinity and Morpheus.

    The problem with the Matrix, is that they have all become more HUMAN, just like what is happening to Agent Smith.

    Computer programs do not sense things, or have anticipation. Neo represents what the Machines want to become, he is just research, studying the remaining humans in an attempt to improve themselves. Their only hope is a reboot, to start over, before this new class of "feeling-programs" takes over, potentially releasing the humans from the Matrix, hence killing the machines.

    The machines did not realize that their crowning achievement (Neo) would fall in love. This is what did not happen with the previous Neos, so they could rest assured that when given the motivation for resetting the Matrix, he would do so willingly.

    What we are going to see in the final film, is either a collaberation between Neo and the Machines, to SAVE the Matrix, or between Neo and SMITH to destroy it, along with themselves for the sake of humanity.

    The 'REVOLUTION' I believe, will be when the now 'feeling' Agent Smith completes his evolution, senses his own humanity, and gives up the secret that Neo and crew are all only programs as well. Then of course, they together set about freeing the humans, then we'll get a nice death scene, or the humans witinue ton Neo and the rest within their own computers, and continue to interface with them as needed.

    1. Re:Neo is indeed a program. by paulbd · · Score: 1

      why would there be humans at all? why believe that any part of the story about the matrix is true?

    2. Re:Neo is indeed a program. by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      Uh, if no humans then who built the machines' ancestors?

      However, it would be quite a story line, if the Matrix were simply a training simulation for an UPCOMING war against the humans.

    3. Re:Neo is indeed a program. by paulbd · · Score: 1

      it doesn't matter who built the machines. why would there be any humans left? why would there be any actual zion at all? if neo is a program, why isn't everything else a program too? the question seems to hinge on whether the claim about humans being farmed is true or not. if its true, then the presence of human avatars in the matrix makes sense. but if that story is not true (and perhaps there never was a war at all), then why are there any humans (as avatars) in the matrix?

      which raises another question i have. many of the "higher" programs (oracle, architect, seraph, merovingian etc.) "hang out" in the matrix? why? if the matrix was truly built as a place for humans to be mentally sustained, why would any self-respecting program be within the simulation? they'd have their own world (perhaps the "real world", or perhaps some other kind of simulation) in which to be. instead, the movie(s) present the matrix as not just a place to keep human minds alive, but also as the environments in which many other kinds of programs live as well. this seems a little odd, and encourages the idea that neo is a program too.

      why would the architect, for example, hang out in the matrix? the architect is presumably either a machine or software entity that built the system that runs the matrix, so why would it choose to descend into its creation and hang out there?

      its also clear from reloaded and the revolutions trailer that seraph has an important role (witness the way he appeared to neo "as code" - he wasn't green, and as i recall was almost like a black hole, a space where code wasn't). what is he doing in the matrix?

    4. Re:Neo is indeed a program. by protonman · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      The man of knowledge must be able not only to love his enemies but also to hate his friends.
    5. Re:Neo is indeed a program. by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, been awhile since you posted, but I think it would be a safe assumption that the architect was only in the matrix when he expected Neo to find him. The oracle is in the matrix b/c her job is similar to that of the agents. I don't remember the seraph or the merovingian, but I'm seeing the movie again tonight.

  81. SPOILER -- Question about the plot by mad44 · · Score: 1
    SPOILER -- SPOILER --

    Ok, it makes sense that Zion is also another form of Matrix (another layer of Matrix for those who are not conforming to original Matrix simulation)...

    But then whywould you need 250,000 sentinels sent to destroy Zion... Why not just reset the Zion program instantly???

    My only explanation is as follows. Every person in the movie (including Neo, Trinity, etc) is a computer program (AI program) that has been tested to see how "human" can they become... Maybe the only real people in the movie are the architect and possibly the Frenchmen's wife who tested how much emotion Neo can put in a kiss... Hence, sentinels being sent are also part of the test, the plot to produce "human", "self-aware" programs... Neo seemed to be close to becoming "self-aware" and maybe he will lead programs in Zion (Trinity, Morpheus, etc.) to become also "self-aware"...

    Does this makes sense??? Or am I way off???

    1. Re:SPOILER -- Question about the plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in the original, weren't the Agents wanting Morpheus for the password to Zion's mainframe ?

      Shut down those errant batteries, turn off their personal Matrix. Seems clear to me that the "free" coppertops use the Matrix technology extensively, and why not, I'd certainly want to plug in, and avoid such a dismal reality when I could...

    2. Re:SPOILER -- Question about the plot by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing, except that Neo is also a human, and is simply being experimented on by other humans in the present or near future.

      And that outside of the second layer of the matrix is a real reality that probably is just some secret research hospitol.

      Of course that would be an incredibly lame and disapointing ending, and I really hope that is not the case.

      perhaps the robots and humans are still fighting, and the robots are testing the long term feasablility of blacking out the sun (we need it more then them really).

      The people in the matrix could all then just be prisoners that are being tested to see what human nature does indeed dictate.

      I still think that the thing with the Architect stanks of social experimentation.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  82. Afterglow... by Ironpoint · · Score: 1


    Listen, there is cool geek and there is dumb geek. This story is DUMB geek. Its just a movie. Get over it. who cares who recognized what was on the screen. A whole movie (with hot chicks even) and all you can dwell on is what was on the terminal screen?

    If you got excited because you recognized what was on the terminal, what does that say about you. 1. You recognized a familiar pattern. 2. That was enough to get you excited 3. You immediately wanted to relay this information to everyone else in the theater by yelping, cheering, whatever. Instead why don't you just stay home, wear your trenchcoat and shaders, and jump off the roof trying to fly like so many before you have.

    "Matrix, the new superman."

  83. DUDE! by rutledjw · · Score: 1
    I've seen the movie twice already, a "special preview" from a vendor and then an "offsite group meeting".

    So either:

    • I'm an uber-geek
    • YOU'RE not up to geek standards and we're going to revoke your membership card!

    Now hand it over... ;)

    --

    Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
  84. But the private network space IS more realistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As many others have said, the hack they showed was thoroughly realistic: the electric power grid is not attached to any public network (Why would it be? Physical security is the only real security.), and even if it were, it would be behind a mother firewall. But, the internal network would use ip, since that's the only game in town. So, in order to shut down a power grid, you need to a.) break into the building, and b.) hook up a laptop to the internal network and break into a machine. It's only logical that the internal, unconnected network would use a 10.*.*.* net.

  85. What no Gibson? by menasius · · Score: 1

    And all this time my lifelong goal was to hack the gibson using a giant Pacman.

    AND NOW
    you tell me there is no mega-computer that has a database consisting of glass columns with Arcing lightning between them... How boring!

    hehe Arc lightning in a processor, "Bob we fried another one!"

    -bort

  86. Why is this so amazing by sublimespot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it's pretty sad. In a movie they do a hack "correctly" and everybody is amazed. How much of their million dollar budgets does it take to properly research this stuff? not much. They never cared about impressing the geek before now. They want to entertain audiences.

    In all reality this hack would have not been left open by the Zion admin. He's a unix operator.

    If you really wanted a hack more in line with reality, she should have called a Zion employee while pretending to be Zion admin. They would have gladly gave up their password.

    1. Re:Why is this so amazing by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      Uhh, they weren't hacking Zion... they are *from* Zion, they were hacking servers that control The Matrix.

    2. Re:Why is this so amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. They were hacking servers that control back-up power generators. If they had gotten root on the servers that control the matrix, the story would have ended right there.

  87. Thank you for the responses. by Dthoma · · Score: 1

    I am aware that the above list of suggested commands does have differing effects on different versions of UNIX and is incomplete. This suggests a different strategy. Log in as root, do what you have to do without interfering with anything else, then get the hell out. :-)

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

  88. Or perhaps it is just a school project... by Berserker76 · · Score: 0

    ...is it only me, or does Zion 101 sound like some college class. Probably just someones program for their thesis in some Computer Science/Philosophy major.

  89. Re:Speaking of hacking, the game dropped the ball. by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    Well guess what, none of them, not one single damn one of this is up and running, prepared to receive the traffic from this game. I've already written Redpill.com and complained (since they seem to be the one responsible for the sites). But the mood is already blown... grrr... ...so let me see, how hard is it to put up a friggen website on time? Rememind me to never consider hiring these clowns for anything mission critical.

    You video-gamers sunsabitches slashdotted the Matrix!

  90. you all missed out on the best part! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cornel West was one of the leaders of Zion! How
    cool is that? (Or evil, depending on your view
    of West's 'prophetic pragmatism?')

  91. STFW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a lousy movie. Who cares how 1337 they are?

  92. Where was the gunplay? (SPOILERS) by lucasw · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one expecting a shootout that would top the lobby scene from the first movie? Instead, we get a cop-out/cheat with Neo stopping bullets with his mind, or guns being kicked out of hands first thing, or Morpheus and the rest of the bunch just shrugging (no bullet-time shrugging?) a little to ward off the swiss-cheesing of his car by an automatic rifle.

    The first/final scene with Trinity and the agent doesn't really suffice, since there isn't much bobbing and weaving, running up the walls, or diving behind pillars to be done while in a free fall.

    I think there was a whole aesthetic of little tiles being smashed (followed by slow motion debris flying through the air) from the first film that was partially lost in Reloaded.

    My last JE has some more related notes...

  93. Um... disable grid nodes? by eMartin · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the command have been something like gnodes -d?

    1. Re:Um... disable grid nodes? by kjd · · Score: 1

      It looked like she was in an interactive console program designed to control the nodes. Y'know, like what you get if you run openssh with no arguments.

  94. z1on password by dangil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    z1on0101 is the password trinity uses when overriding the powerplant password...

    I would put this password first in line on my dictionary for password attacks....

    I know all my servers will have this password from now on..

  95. ipv6 by oohp · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised they aren't using IPv6 so far in the future.

    1. Re:ipv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't know about you, but if I were simulating the year 2000, I would have a lot more IPv4 networks in that simulation than IPv6.

  96. How did they get the pictures of the screening? by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    Thy had to have a camera or something, right? The announcement at the beginning tells you it's illegal. Yet there they are. Insecure.org, by definition is an accessory after-the-fact to illegal copying of copyrighted information.

    Good job, guys. Reporting on law-breaking as "news."

  97. Re:Did you even watch the 2nd movie? by mikedaisey · · Score: 1


    Not until it has been definitively thrown out, it's still the dumbest thing in it. Complain away!

  98. You are a pathetic retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG my unix programs don't say Y/N !!!!oneone!!!eleven LOL ROTFL BBQ

  99. Slashdotted :) (Re:nmap is easily fooled) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    After all those careful work, you post it here to get slashdotted? Pathetic :)

  100. WARNING SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

    Actually it's probably closer to the year 3000 than 2199. Why is this? Because it's been 100 years since 'this' Zion has been created. There were about 5 others before that, presumably lasting about the same period of time (the architect states that the cycle of "The One" is predictable.) Then before that were the failed matrices, and before that was the war to end all wars. In the first movie, Morpheus believes it is 2199 because he has no idea there were other Matrices before the current one. I imagine we'll find out in the next movie, Reloaded raised many more questions than it answered.

    1. Re:WARNING SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER by Frysco · · Score: 1

      Morpheus believes it is 2199 because he has no idea there were other Matrices before the current one.

      Actually, Agent Smith confessed to during Morpheus' interrogation during the first movie that there was at least one prior incarnation of the Matrix - the 'perfect' one, which no-one accepted and they lost 'whole crops' because of it. The Architect confirmed this to Neo also in Reloaded.

      --
      -Frysco!
  101. But even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even worse .. they STILL havent gone to IPv6!!

  102. Fake! by cookiepus · · Score: 1

    It's too bad they didn't show her trying to find binary packages for the distro - failing to, hunting down all the dependancies, ./configure; make, take a nap, make install.

    i'd really relate to that

  103. Mirror by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 1

    That server looks like it's getting loaded. Here's a mirror.

  104. nmap isn't a hacking tool by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

    It's a security analysis tool. There's a difference. nmap, in and of itself, can't "hack" or even crash machines.

    It doesn't send any data down the ports it connects to. It's analogous to looking at all the windows on a house. You may be doing it because you want to break into it, or you may be doing it because you're interested in architecture.. but what if you're blind? You could get someone to tell you about what's there.. but if there isn't someone who can tell you this, you would have to walk around the outside of the building and touch the windows to see where they are. Is this breaking into the building? No.

    And this, mes amis, is what nmap does.

    -- Someone who almost once got into a lot of trouble for using nmap for analysis of a hacked machine :P

    "Riiiight.. so I hacked it and then told you about it?"

    1. Re:nmap isn't a hacking tool by metalpet · · Score: 1

      I have a vague recollection of various hardware (cisco routers?) crashing painfully when tickled the wrong way by nmap. Sure, it wasn't intentional, but it did crash machines. oh, and real-world analogies for cyber-stuff are almost always bogus. It's a bit like dragging pans tied to your car with wires down the highway. you know?

    2. Re:nmap isn't a hacking tool by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when you're dealing with someone who doesn't have a fricken cloo, it's helpful for getting them to understand :)

      And yes, after I posted that, I remember I had got some HP printers to do funny stuff with nmap.. but it wasn't a DoS, just they started making noises for a minute or so

  105. speeling by lemonk · · Score: 1

    Reseting? Clearly a sign of an open source app if it has typos in its comments to the user.

    --
    You are only popular on the Internet.
  106. what's the big deal? by oogamrm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Come on, Taco! Why is it news that a movie with a $175 million dollar budget would actually use a real computer exploit? Are you thinking that nmap is so Slashdot cool that we have to read about it here? Is this any more surprising than the appearance of real 21st century motorcycles in the same movie? The real news is just how uncreative The Matrix Reloaded turned out to be - a souless fireworks display of technology that tells us next to nothing about this virtual world of the future.

    1. Re:what's the big deal? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      "Come on, Taco! Why is it news that a movie with a $175 million dollar budget would actually use a real computer exploit? Are you thinking that nmap is so Slashdot cool that we have to read about it here?"

      Obviously it is. Everyone on /. has been pissing their pants over Matrix Craploaded ever since it was first announced. And anyone who even questions the movie is met with shouts of "you're too dumb to understand it". God forbid that even if you do understand the film you don't like it.

      You see, it's not about nmap... it's about trying to bring a single thread of legitamacy to the matrix. Nearly every post I've read on /. in the past two days dealing with the Matrix has been a desperate attempt to justify any interest in this bloated, self-serving attempt at sci-fi.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  107. Re:Zion0101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anybody else read Zion I and I? Jah, mon. Jah and man are one.

  108. yeah sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your fingers don't count, nigga.

    1. Re:yeah sure by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      your fingers don't count, nigga.

      Speaking of which, learn to count, you freakin' poser.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  109. DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is showing this hack a violation of the DMCA?

  110. Re:Well that's why she had to BREAK INTO the offic by MyHair · · Score: 1
    She had to break into this private secure office building before she even began hacking.
    Oh, is that what happened? I didn't see the break-in part as I was watching her skin-tight leather too closely.

    Her leather wasn't in the shot when they showed the screen, so I noticed the ssh connection and thought it was cool, but it went off before I noticed nmap.
  111. Matrix Kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting how the Architect... who wrote the matrix kernel looks like 'cornel' Sanders from KFC :)

  112. WATCH THE ANIMATRIX by smart.id · · Score: 1

    This goes to every who has replied to this thread. Some of your theories are very interesting, however they can be proven false by watching The Second Renaissance Parts I and II from the Animatrix. It explains how the Matrix was created and that there is a war between Man and Machine. Unless the Animatrix is designed to totally throw people off, it is a valid representation of prequels to the Matrix.

    I suggest you watch the two movies (The Second Renaissance Parts I and II) at Into the Matrix.com before coming to your theories.

    --
    blog & fiction: jd87
    1. Re:WATCH THE ANIMATRIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These episodes claim to be historical files from the Zion archive, they are not necessarily the truth if Zion is fake.

  113. [ SPOILER ] Age of Matrix by MyHair · · Score: 1
    ... but if you take morpheus's statment about how they have been fighting the machiines for 100 years and there have been 6 ones before then it could only be 700 years old.
    Several people have commented about the 100 years as if it were and absolute Matrix cycle time. In fact the reason the first Matrix failed was due to its reliance on perfect mathmatic formulae.

    The architect spoke of increasing probability that the system would fail, so I expect the life cycle of the Matrix/The One would be variable. This cycle was roughly 100 years long, but perhaps others were 10 years or 2000 years long.

    Morpheus told one of his superiors that they've freed more people in the past 6 months than the previous 6 years. If the Matrix error and probability of failure increases it would make sense to me that it would increase exponentially, and the dramatic increase is what is ends the cycle. One question might be whether the emergence of a powerful/anomolic dude like Neo was an effect or cause of the end of the cycle, or if Neo-types happen all the time and are dealt with in another manner by the control programs when it's too soon. Hell, maybe Neo-types are programatically enhanced to become "The One" when the other anomolies become too high. chown neo /var/human/powers/super and ln -s /var/human/powers/super ~neo/README?

    I'm really trying to wrap my head around the possibilities of where/what Zion is and what the "real" situation is. There are so many directions to go. They didn't disappoint me in this sequel, so maybe they won't in the next sequel, either.

    Another thing: if Neo visiting the architect was a planned event then was the pursuit of the keymaker by "the twins" and two agents just for show? Or are the programs not in on the scheme? How could they not be?

    Cool movie.
    1. Re:[ SPOILER ] Age of Matrix by metalpet · · Score: 1

      > if Neo visiting the architect was a planned event then was the pursuit of the keymaker by "the twins" and two agents just for show?

      You could ask the same thing about the agents trying really hard to access zion's mainframe in the first movie.
      It seems pretty clear agents aren't really kept in the loop for everything.
      It's different for the twins. The Merovingian knew about pretty much everything, and tried to keep the keymaker away from its "destiny" purposefully. The twins were merely following orders.
      It makes you wonder what the merovingian was trying to accomplish.. destroy the matrix, maybe?

  114. Matrix OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, teh Matrix runs on *nix - Windows doesn't have a 'root' user..

  115. Re:Afterglow... MOD UP by Ryokos_boytoy · · Score: 1

    Come on, thats some funny shit.

    --


    If you don't say anything, you won't be called on to repeat it. -- Calvin Coolidge
  116. "Powers" outside the Matrix by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    I suspect the real world is still the real world, but something in Neo's development while attached to the Matrix gave him wireless capability as well as the standard cat 5 in the back of the head sort.

    This extra communication channel has always given him an advantage but has been largely subconcious until now. He's gradually become aware of it and uses it conciously for the first time when he feels the octopus things coming into range at the end.

    Actually that could be an interesting subcontext. The machines took over because they were capable of being designed to be far more efficient than man. However they cannot account for man's greatest advantage, the ability to adapt and evolve by chance. They can design The Matrix to fit humans, but over time humans can evolve and change to exploit aspects of the matrix in ways the machines cannot predict.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:"Powers" outside the Matrix by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I think Smith gave him something...Smith took over one of the freedmen and returned to 'the real world'; was it not that same guy who later cut his hand, got a little blood on the other and shook hands with Neo? That was important, but I just haven't figured out how yet.

      There's obviously more to Smith than we know. Could he have given ---holy crap, I just remembered he gave Neo his earpiece. Perhaps that gave Neo a better hook into controlling/stopping the Squiddies. Also, that was Neo's closest encounter with a Squiddie...they didn't get that close to him in the first movie.

      And there was another bleeding hand reference while fighting the dudes just after springing the keymaker. I have a feeling they tie together somehow, but maybe not.

    2. Re:"Powers" outside the Matrix by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's certainly a reference there with the two bleeding hands. I didn't suppose that Smiths blood signified any sort of transference. I suspected that he was just experimenting with his humanity. Perhaps the link is that both of them are crossing a bridge. Neo is a human that has taken on machine aspects and Smith is a machine that has taken on a human aspect. In some way they are "blood" brothers.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  117. Tritnity, eh? by megabyte405 · · Score: 1

    I noticed that Trinity used the exploit, but Tritnity, her alter-ego, did as well! Wow, I should have payed better attention :-)

    --
    I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
  118. 10.2.2.2 not being publically addressable by digitaltraveller · · Score: 1

    This makes sense for a few reasons.
    (1) If the Matrix producers had been stupid enough to have published a real address, that site would be copping a distributed "slashdot nmapping" right now. I was at a security conference where George Kurtz (Foundstone) was giving a presentation and kept using "target.com" to describe the host getting attacked. After the presentation, a representative from Target (the chainstore) came up and told him to knock it off and start using example.[org|net|com] in his presentations. RFC2606
    was written to promote example.org for exactly that purpose.
    (2)Some of the previously reserved real internet address space (I forget which exactly) has now become "unreserved". But the unlucky who have been allocated this space have big problems because many old/unmaintained firewalls explicitly disallow traffic to/from those networks. So it's conceivable that the 10.x.x.x address space was opened up in Neo's time.
    (3) Even without the two above scenarios, Trinity could easily already have compromised a gateway router/packet filter to an internal network. Maybe we didn't see that bit.

    1. Re:10.2.2.2 not being publically addressable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (2)Some of the previously reserved real internet address space (I forget which exactly) has now become "unreserved". But the unlucky who have been allocated this space have big problems because many old/unmaintained firewalls explicitly disallow traffic to/from those networks. So it's conceivable that the 10.x.x.x address space was opened up in Neo's time.

      You mean late 1999/early 2000?

      Trust me, there is NO WAY that the 10.x.x.x address block will EVER be publically routable. EVER.

  119. DOH! by limited · · Score: 1

    wow, now I really feel stupid for saying "I caught a mistake in the movie. You can't log in as root" DOH

  120. Flavors of geekdom by Dissonant · · Score: 1

    I believe that this illustrates one of the major differences between Science Geeks and Art Geeks.

    Geek of Sciences: "This means what the author intended it to mean."

    Geek of Arts: "This means what I think it means."

    There is an obvious parallel here between objective and subjective views of reality. The science geek believes that meaning is inherent to the text, imbued by its creator. The art geek believes that meaning is assigned by each member of a work's audience, and the meaning differs from person to person.

    I'm personally inclined to believe that each perspective has its merits. Does this make me an arts geek? Hee hee, you tell me.

    1. Re:Flavors of geekdom by Prune · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can put people in categories like that. I'm a scientist, yet I view many works of literature as in your description of Geek of Arts. In some books, the author intends to pass some meaning through, in others, meaning is left to the reader (in some cases the authors go to great lengths to make it so, such as in Henry James' "The Turn of the Screw").

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  121. Guilty by Dissonant · · Score: 1

    He said he feels guilty. Whether it's wrong or not is a part of the question; whether it's legal or not isn't.

    Like, I can feel guilty about cheating on my girlfriend. Even though it's not illegal.

    1. Re:Guilty by feepness · · Score: 1

      He said he feels guilty. Whether it's wrong or not is a part of the question; whether it's legal or not isn't.

      Like, I can feel guilty about cheating on my girlfriend. Even though it's not illegal.


      Actually, he said he _didn't_ feel guilty. This is part of what I find distasteful... not that emotional guilt ameliorates anything.

  122. Re:SSH: security through obscurity? - NOPE by Bilbo · · Score: 1
    > Dumbass, can you read?

    Well, it's obvious he reads a lot better than you do. Look at the quote again:

    "I think there are at least two public exploits in circulation right now, ... And I know there are some that are not public."
    It says that there are some exploits which are well understood, and probably well documented, and then some others that are not public. In other words, he knows something exists, but that doesn't mean he knows the details of the exploits. Any time a system is broken into, the exploit leaves a trail of breadcrumbs as it were. You can generally tell if one breakin uses the same vector as another known one, or if it is something new. So, the quote says they have evidence of other exploits, but not necessarily any other details about them.

    Besides... what is the advantage of publishing the nature of the exploits? The security vulnerabilities are well known, and already patched. Are you a kiddie looking for another 'sploit script to download and start using on other people's systems?

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  123. They rejected it because there wasn't any choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remeber what the architech said. Agent smith wasn't informed of why it happened although, since it was uncessary for his functioning and just deduced it himself he states it directly as an opinion, not fact.

  124. *Spoiler* Re:Uhm... by orpheus2k · · Score: 1

    What I gathered from The Architect's monologue was that it was at least several hundreds of years or possibly thousands of years into the future: it was the 6th version of the matrix, and assuming that each time Zion starts fresh with just a handful of people, the time it takes for the population to get up to a quarter of a million would be many, many years, times 6. So the original poster is correct, that it is far into the future. But each time through the matrix has "allowed" itself to be exploited in that way.

    </spoiler>
  125. Oh, why not, let's play with numbers by Vip · · Score: 1

    314 seconds. Right?

    John 3:14 - And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up

    However, for an interesting read on John 3:14 and it's meaning, try http://wwwstaff.murdoch.edu.au/~loader/MkLent4.htm

    There you will see that this section of the Bible talks about Jesus being "lifted up" for various
    reasons. "Like the ascent in 3:13 this refers to the event which begins at Jesus' death."

    Meaning, being lifted up, and being looked upon and will bring salvation, but this begins with his "death", and Neo had his death and resurrection in the first movie.

    See where numbers lead?

    Vip

    1. Re:Oh, why not, let's play with numbers by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      314 seconds. Right?

      John 3:14 - And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up


      In your dreams, God-boy.. It's the start of 'pi'.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    2. Re:Oh, why not, let's play with numbers by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 1

      You rock, I was just thinking that.

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
    3. Re:Oh, why not, let's play with numbers by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Well, just to be sure I went and asked my wife (lifetime God-botherer, failed high school maths) if the number 3.14 meant anything to her.

      She replied 'pi' without even thinking about it.

      So I think most people will recognise 3.14 seconds as being a reference to pi, if they notice it at all. I'll also comment that a 'second' is a unit of angle; 1/3600 of a degree. I suspect hints of a "Foundation" style ending. Perhaps Zion is the birthplace of the AI. :)

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    4. Re:Oh, why not, let's play with numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you REALLY want to go into it, try the simplest solutions, they usually work best.
      314 seconds is equal to what, class?
      5 minutes and 14 seconds, or 5:14
      We simply switch the colon out for a slash, and 5/14 looks suspiciously like a date.
      May 14th, it turns out is also the pre-release showing date of Matrix:Reloaded.
      Class dismissed

  126. yes! by mikeee · · Score: 1

    You want to run a bunch of AIs and a simulation of the world, so you run it on a Beowulf Cluster of human brains.

    This also partially explains Neo's powers; because part of the simulation is running in unused areas of his brain, he is able to alter it.

    I understand an early draft of the script actually included some of this, but it was 'simplified' away.

    1. Re:yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, because before, they used the sun as their processor.

      - preeko

  127. Merovingians and the Matrix by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The Merovingians weren't terribly interesting in a historical sense- they set up shop in the power vacuum left by the Romans, and ruled over the Franks for a few hundred years (5th to 8th century CE). Their rules regarding inheritance were not terribly well thought out (kingdoms were split among surviving sons), and so the kingdom slowly fragmented. Also, Ummayad Muslims were starting to make incursions over the Pyrennes. With the fragmentation of central royal authority, real power was held by palace mayors. One of these, Charles "The Hammer" Martel turned back the Arabs at Tours, which was a turning point not only against the Arabs, but for the balance of power in the kingdom. Charles Martel's son, Pepin the Short, became king of the Franks. His son, Charles, would go on to found the Carolingian dynasty and become the first Holy Roman Emperor in 800 CE; he is better known as Charles the Great, or Charlemagne.

    So, the actual history of the Merovingians, not so exciting. The mythology is better though, and far more relevant to "The Matrix." The founder of the Merovingians, Merovec, is considered to be somewhat mythical. The first Merovingian for which there is good historical evidence for is Merovec's supposed grandson, Clovis. As the above poster notes, one story has Merovec as half beast. Other accounts (with connections to Gnostic Christianity, a subject that has been much discussed in relation to "The Matrix") claim that Merovec was the descendant of Jesus (and Mary Magdelene). Yeah, I know, but just bear with me. Now, after the Carolingians took over, supposedly a secret society was formed to reinstall the Merovingians to the throne (after all, who could have more authority than someone with the bloodline of David and Jesus?). This society is named the Prieure de Sion, or the Priory of Zion. (ominous music plays for effect)

    This secret society, as all secret societies eventually must (seems to be a rule of conspiracy theory), has been linked to the Knights Templar (which were quite real, actually (formed during the Crusades, became quite wealthy through guarding banking transactions, like a medieval Brinks, were annihilated by Philip the Fair in 1307), though the mythology that has sprung up regarding them is vast) and through them to every secret society you've ever heard of- the Freemasons, the Illuminati, etc.... In other words, the character "the Merovingian" is connected in name to bunch of real world secret conspiracy plots, just the sort of thing you'd like for a fictional character connected in deep with secret conspiracy plots. I must admit it's nice to see that the brothers Wachowski have really done their homework.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  128. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well since she used Rlogin bug via SSH, you guys are debating the merrits of it, i'd say it's a: nice to see they did their research. As for the alagorical themese mostly real.

  129. Screensaver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I notice they must be running KDE, as half the time the same screensaver comes up.

    You know, the one that has all the back to front chars in green letters on a black background?

  130. Obvious. by IICV · · Score: 1

    They didn't.

  131. Just watched it by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
    I just watched the version downloaded from torrentse.cx (someone seems to have hacked it; earlier today it was a blank page that said "what" at the top; now the "what" appears green-on-black and in various shades of green, i.e. "the matrix strikes back"), and have a few things to say. Here seems like the best place to put it. ;-)

    1. It was a tripod capture, with a few adjustments. At the beginning the "EXIT" sign is visible on the left, but then they zoom a bit to remove it. A couple times throughout the film, the picture is rotated slightly but they fixed it after a bit (less than a minute). There are some audio errors (pops and static) but none of the dialog is obscured. The credits are cut off, probably because the guy had to get out of there. There is, however, no audience noise, so perhaps it was a private screening of some sort?

    2. I was greatly reminded of MST3K. Perhaps it was because of the somewhat tinny sound, but the music sounded exactly like some of the movies they parody. I couldn't shake that feeling throughout the movie, which made it a bit funnier than it probably should have been. The Architect also reminded me of the Rocky Horror Picture Show's audience line, "This man has no neck!"

    3. I like what people have been saying, that when they escaped they only escaped into a "meta-matrix." This would explains Neo's "power" to overcome the sentinels at the end.

    4. I caught one of Morpheus's quotes: "I have dreamed a dream, and now the dream is gone from me." (Thanks to watching it on the PC, I could call up Google after pausing it.) This is in Daniel 2:3-5 of the bible, and the title of Daniel 2 is "Nebuchadnezzar's Dream." They did a good job with the references, as I see from other comments many others have found them.

    5. I enjoyed the first movie more. Sequels are difficult, but even so it had the best opening weekend of all time. It has some timeless qualities to it: choosing your mate over your tribe, and the consequences of that decision. And the "living in a box (within a box (within a box (within..." -- it'll be interesting to see how the Wachowski brothers decide to end the series. When I saw the first movie it was in the afternoon, and I walked outside to a sunny sky with a few clouds and thought, "whoa." Something inside me had changed; this movie didn't do that, although it was good entertainment.

    6. I liked the gift of the spoon from one of the orphans.

    7. The special effects were pretty cool, but I really don't see that powerful a difference between the first movie and the second. They spent a lot of money creating the process, and it was money well-spent because the process can be used for many future movies. But so many studios have been adding bullet-time to their films that it just didn't "stand out" like the original.

    8. I will see it in the theatre. Perhaps that'll have the "whoa" effect, but perhaps not as I've already seen it. We'll see.

    9. The movie didn't flow very straightforward. Some scenes were unmentioned dream scenes until you see Neo wake up, and some scenes were action inside the Matrix, then a meeting from previously, then Neo and Trinity on the ship, then back into the Matrix -- and the footage from the dream scenes was reused toward the end (to good effect, but they saved a little on effects ;-). Because of this jumping around it felt somewhat like Pulp Fiction . I wonder what the brothers think of Quentin Tarantino?



    As I said, I'll see it again in the theatre and I'll probably pick up some things I missed the first time around. Enjoy!

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  132. Intermingled Destinies. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    After pausing to think about it a bit, I've come to some possible explainatons. As these are both spoilers for the current Matrix: Reloaded, and possibly Revolution, I'll post them in a reply to this post.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Intermingled Destinies. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      *SPOILER ALERT!* Scroll down if you want to see it.

      (1) Agent Smith went rogue, developing both a new level of awareness and the ability to "infect" others with his code, including humans jacked into the Matrix. He developed this as a result of Neo merging with him at the end of the first movie.

      (2) As such, Neo infected the Matrix with his own "code", in the form of the happily and gratuitously reproducing Agent Smith. The more Smiths, the larger the infection. Agent Smith, in the first movie, compared humans to virii, and in an ironic twist of fate, became a virus himself.

      (3) The innate nature of viruses, biological and technological, is to reproduce, overwhelm and eventually take control of systems. Therefore, in the case of Neo and Agent Smith, they have cross contaminated two realities.

      (4) As a portion of Neo's "code" is continuously reproducing and consuming more of the matrix's resources, and as the guardians are controlled by the matrix, Neo now can directly control the matrix without being jacked in. Being a part of it, however, means that disrupting the matrix while jacked out can also have an impact on his health.

      As the Architect said, the point of the matrix was to create a 100% perfect harmony between man and machine. However, the Architect takes a totalitarian view of perfection, an all or nothing at all approach. Neo proves him wrong by rescuing Trinity, something he wasn't supposed to be able to do.

      This indicates a flaw in the Architect's reasoning (which makes sense since he was originally human to begin with), this also suggests that wiping out either Zion or the matrix are not the only two options.

      As Neo has infected the matrix, and Agent Smith has infected the physical world, this suggests that the final matrix will end with neither mankind nor the matrix being destroyed, but developing a truly symbiotic relationship, possibly evolving into a wholly new life form.

      Hence the cliffhanger ending, with Neo lying directly across from the surviving crew member (I forgot his name), who was infected by Agent Smith. They have a shared destiny where both may wind up having to work together to save both realities.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  133. Unpatched servers by oojah · · Score: 1

    I like these lines from The Register's take on it:

    Is Zalewski surprised to see unpatched SSH servers running in the year AD 2199? "It's not that uncommon for people to run the old distribution," he says. "I know we had a bunch of boxes that were unpatched for two years."

    From http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/30747.html

    Roger

    --
    Do you have any better hostages?
    1. Re:Unpatched servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you remembered the first movie. Morpheous explains to Neo that he may think it's the year 1999, when outside the matrix, it's actually closer to the year 2199.

      The matrix date is somewhere after 1999, so the exploit would make sense. It is taking place in a 1999 power plant.

  134. anachronism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the portscanner and the vulnerability are from times years after the world emulated by the matrix.

    1. Re:anachronism by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      they dont tell you exactly how much time has passed, and based on the 2002/2003 model Escalades the twin bad guys drive (can tell by the headlight setup), I think its safe to say more time has passed than most people realize

  135. mmmm hmmm by msouth · · Score: 1

    Just as I would have suspected. This movie has a sex scene in it, right? And you guys are drooling over a screen shot of nmap....

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  136. C++ and Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the Matrix is written in C++, and that's why the flow of time seems normal.

    The 'bullet time' parts where things move verrrrrrry sloooooooowly are written in Java.

  137. Smith ashamed and embarrassed in first movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the first movie, Smith has a conversation with Morpheus (the famous "humanity is a virus" speech). At the end of that speech, another agent comes in and sees them. Smith looks ashamed and embarrassed, an dthe other agent asks him "what are you doing?".

    At that point I thought that Smith was already getting infected with something that would change his nature. I don't quite recall, but I believe that Smith unplugged his earpiece at the beginning of that conversation with Morpheus, too!

    1. Re:Smith ashamed and embarrassed in first movie by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Yes, he unplugged to be able to talk to Morpheus without being interupted.. which became a problem because he didn't hear about Neo and Trinity shooting everyone in the lobby. He could have done things differently (like maybe lock the door) if he knew they were on their way.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  138. More allusions by BernardMarx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are a lot of references to Merovingian being something of a "devil" character.

    In Reloaded, Persephone was Merovingian's discontent wife. In Greek mythology, Persephone was forced to marry Hades, the god of the Underworld.

    Also, if I recall correctly (I've only seen it once), Merovingian said that he was once like Neo, but had since grown bored of that, or stopped caring or something. In Christian mythology, the devil was once an angel, but had fallen.

    In both cases (or all three, including Merovec), the Matrix's Merovingian is meant to be a character who enjoy playing tricks, hatching plots, and otherwise being a thorn in the side of the protagonist.

    META: Why do I never find the interesting posts and think of good replies until after they're a day old.

  139. I get 88 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I timed Neo's death as best as I could for the heck of it, and I get 88 seconds.

  140. Re:Well that's why she had to BREAK INTO the offic by little_blaine · · Score: 1

    Digging deeper into pathetic land: So, even if she knew that the server's internal address was 10.2.2.2, how did she arrange for the ssh binary exploit to be at the host that she was hacking from?

  141. or by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    How in antitrust, they were pumping their own gas, which is illegal in Oregon, which is where they were supposed to be...

  142. Ok you piece of shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...did you have to spoil Matrix Reloaded before I even watched it? IN SUBJECT!!! You must be mad, and some other idiot saying "YO IST GREAT THEY USED AN ACTUAL EXPLOIT TO OBTAIN THIS AND THAT" for Gods sake...

  143. Neo's Run you all forgot to ask Why... by RKMBrown · · Score: 1

    Ok you guys seem to have all figured out the what, who, and how by describing the two predominant theories.

    I. The Matrix is recursive and all controlling
    II. Feature creep between NEO/Smith creating unforeseen kaos in the matrix via morphing, viruses etc and / or genetic & human learning skills.

    But what you all forgot to ask is, Why is the Matrix? Humans as copper top energizer bunnies? no comment...

    This is the first key to unlocking the puzzle. Before I even watched Reloaded last weekend it dawned on me that everyone in the Matrix is perfect and young just like another great SciFi film called Logan's Run. Hmm. Then I thought what if we humans created the Matrix with the assistance of the programs and machines we built. What if we built the Matrix because of a man made holocaust, ala Logan's Run, to put a few hundred thousand humans into stasis for the purpose of extending the human race until such a time as the Earth has rebounded and we can come out of our high tech hot tubs?

    With this in mind, when I watched reloaded everything fit into place. The Dance / Celebration before the "Choice" game and "Run" scenes, followed by meeting the Architect, ... In a very big sense the Matrix can be argued to be a modern day remake of Logans Run.

    Then today I goggled up Logan's Run & Matrix and what do I find?

    http://williamfnolan.com/LogansRun.htm

    Producer of the Matrix Joel Silver is about to remake Logan's Run.

    I'll leave it to you guys to point out all of the references, suffice it to say I caught a ton of references to corroborate this potential story line.

    Cheers, Thor (aka RKMBrown)

  144. about 10.2.2.2 by oordaz · · Score: 0

    the dvd version will come with a deleted scene where trinity FIRST hacks a public IP; later (one on the intranet) she hack into the 10.2.2.2 :)

  145. No Meta-Matrix by Tekgno · · Score: 1

    There isn't a meta-matrix as so many of you suggest, Neo is in the real world.
    He has just woken up from the real world and realised that all rules can be bent not just those of the Matrix.
    There is a lot of eastern philosophy in here, I can even start blabbing about quantum magic.
    The Wachowski brothers spoke on this topic in an interview a while ago:

    http://whatisthematrix.warnerbros.com/cmp/larrya nd ychat.html

    Given this fact, it is entirely plausible that Neo is in the real world, he is just more enlightened than normal people.
    What would really throw people for a six though would be if Neo became buddha. It is possible but it would probably alienate too many viewers, but I reckon it is probably a bet worth taking, any takers?

  146. What is the Not-Matrix by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    Okay, okay, I wanted to test my .sig. Might as well choose an old almost-on-topic article.

    1. Re:What is the Not-Matrix by beethoven032 · · Score: 1

      No one can tell you what the Not-Matrix is... you have to experience it for yourself. --beethoven032

  147. zion and everyone in it are part of the matrix by mazykhan · · Score: 1

    OK, this is what I think, I am not sure if some of the info has been repeated.
    \\The architect and oracle, and maybe the woman at the bar who kissed neo are the real humans and programmers.
    \\Most everyone else, including neo, trinity, morph, tank, etc is a program.
    \\Zion and everything we have seen are all within matrix.
    \\If Zion and the humans within it were not within matrix, then they would all have some memory of the fact that matrix has in fact reloaded for the past 5 times since they are now free living and non-connected beings, yet no one seemed to know, and neo was surprised to find out....
    \\Also, the fact that neo can control outside of matrix entities shows that they are still within matrix
    \\The woman at the bar kissed neo to perhaps test his humanity
    \\architect is trying to see how the program neo is getting close to reality, and perhaps neo's program shows sign of humanity when he chooses love over life at the end
    \\So in conclusion, architect and bunch of other programmers have written codes of the matrix and all characters within it to create a super program, or a program with a soul and conscious; neo

    Mazyar Ahmadi

    1. Re:zion and everyone in it are part of the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, this is what I think, I am not sure if some of the info has been repeated.
      \\The architect and oracle, and maybe the woman at the bar who kissed neo are the real humans and programmers.

      There were numerous allusions to them all being programs, not humans. This was consistent throughout the movie.

      \\Most everyone else, including neo, trinity, morph, tank, etc is a program.
      Why then, the the Architect point out to Neo that he was "irrevocably human" in describing his behavior?

      \\Zion and everything we have seen are all within matrix.
      \\If Zion and the humans within it were not within matrix, then they would all have some memory of the fact that matrix has in fact reloaded for the past 5 times since they are now free living and non-connected beings, yet no one seemed to know, and neo was surprised to find out....

      Have you even seen the movie? Did you miss the part where the Architect says Zion has been destroyed 5 times in the past, and that Neo will take 7 males and 16 females from the matrix (note that is NOT Zion) and begin the next iteration of Zion. All 250,000 people in the existing Zion will be destroyed.

      The "matrix-within-a-matrix" movie has already been made, it was called the 13th floor, and it sucked.

      \\Also, the fact that neo can control outside of matrix entities shows that they are still within matrix
      Again, I wonder if you even saw the movie. Go see it again and pay attention to what Smith says to Neo. They are connected somehow, and through this Neo is connected to all the machines. If you saw the movie you would remember he said "Its different now" and "I can feel them" when the sentinels approached at the end of the movie. He can influence machines in the real world, it seems.

      \\The woman at the bar kissed neo to perhaps test his humanity
      She, like her old man, is an AI. A self-aware and feeling machine. No doubt his quest for power had corrupted him just as it would corrupt any human. She only longed for what he used to be, and saw someone who reminded her of that.

      \\architect is trying to see how the program neo is getting close to reality, and perhaps neo's program shows sign of humanity when he chooses love over life at the end
      \\So in conclusion, architect and bunch of other programmers have written codes of the matrix and all characters within it to create a super program, or a program with a soul and conscious; neo

      If that is truely the case, what a monumental letdown it would be. That kind of plot belongs in a movie of the week, and not on the big screen.

      The third movie has a lot to live up to, and it needs to make up for what the second movie was, even though the second movie was necessary to set the stage.

  148. idono by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    if near everyone is working at slavelabour wages in either fast food, software companies that go nowhere, or other such effort sinks...i can see it. got an idea? shut up - you arent entitled to that idea. that idea is now copyright microsoft...oh wait... agent bill?
    sometimes i wonder how it is that western civilization manages to go anywhere...

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  149. That's what bugged me by John+Penix · · Score: 1

    She's on a private network, in the 10.X range. Why did the computer come with nmap and an ssh exploit? Did she code the exploit up from memory real quick?

    --
    Someone named an OS for me.
  150. not trinity? by akb · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm a dork for posting to this article long after its dead but I just watched a screener version of the movie and I don't think Trinity rooted the system. To me it looks like Trinity walks into the room, kicks ass and then resumes where the previous woman left off. 'member? The woman who says "almost done" and then the sentinels blow up her ship. It looks to me that Trinity just sits down reads the screen and types in the password.

    1. Re:not trinity? by falsification · · Score: 1

      Interesting. This probably ties into a video game. Great marketing. I applaud their "skill."

  151. ***MILD SPOILER*** by daeley · · Score: 1

    One wonders, what language would have been used?

    French. ;)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.