Slashdot Mirror


Experiences with Alternate Local Phone Companies?

chasmosis asks: "In the last few months, I've moved about 25 minutes outside of St. Louis and discovered that the local baby bell charges exorbitant rates (at least in my view). I've explored alternate local carriers like Sprint and others who have had uncompetitive prices, poor customer service records, or were unclear on things like 'specifically what exchanges can I call that are still considered local calls'. Right now I'm on SBC's Metro plan where I can call to and from much of the St. Louis local area as a local call instead of a toll call. I'd dump my landline entirely and get another cell if I didn't need it for dial up internet, since I live in the sticks and there is no cable, no DSL, and the top speed for dialup is 28.8. What are other people using for alternatives to their local telephone provider? What are your experiences, good and bad?"

346 comments

  1. If you really want to escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just get a cellular/mobile phone. All of my friends that have tried alternate phone companies (like from the cable company) have had really hard times getting things working right. The ones that have just gone straight to mobile have been much happier.

    1. Re:If you really want to escape by drew_92123 · · Score: 1

      I've had "some" luck with those 3g modem cards in a laptop here at work. It was about as fast as Ricochet was in my area, 5-11 kbps. Not great but at least as fast as a good modem connection.

      While cable is still a little expensive, it may offer a better alternative if you really need a reliable connection and don't want to put money in the bells pockets.

      If your not concerned about reliability, try looking for a bargain DSL package.

    2. Re:If you really want to escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA. He needs a landline for 'net access.

    3. Re:If you really want to escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you? "What are other people using for alternatives to their local telephone provider? What are your experiences, good and bad?" Discussion was not restricted to his situation only.

    4. Re:If you really want to escape by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Just get a cellular/mobile phone.

      Expensive if 99% of your long distance calls are international!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:If you really want to escape by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Bzzt. The poster needs dialup internet.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:If you really want to escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt. He asked for experiences in general. (See the very end.)

    7. Re:If you really want to escape by shaitand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ok in what world is cable more reliable than DSL?

      I can't honestly speak for anywhere but my locale, but here you recieve a static IP with DSL, you have a fixed guaranteed bandwidth rate up and down, it considered a business class connection with equivelent response and support, and it costs the same as cable.

      Cable internet on the other hand, has NO guaranteed bandwidth at all, it's 100 people on a t1 and all 100 are told they have a 1.544mbps connection, if you read the fine print, the cable company doesn't guarantee your speed at ANY rate, not even 56k. They also consider it theft if you use a router and nat your connection! It violates their terms of service. You have agreed not to run a server of any kind. You have a capped upload speed that is slower than your down speed. And for this I'm going to pay about $5/months more than DSL???

      Is my area an exception or do you really think of a shared consumer grade connection as more stable than a guaranteed business class connection?

    8. Re:If you really want to escape by mytador · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, not neccesserily, He could get international calling cards

    9. Re:If you really want to escape by iwnbs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, out here in Palm Springs, CA the Roadrunner installation (cable) from Time Warner out performs any DSL connection out here. The connection is advertised as a 2MB down 400KB up, but many bandwidth tests have shown 2.8MB down and around 700 KB up. Those numbers shatter the marks any of our local DSL providers put up. It may be due to the fact that AOL/Time Warner implmented a fiber connection to each house for internet usage 2 years ago. It's about $8/mo. more than DSL, but well worth it in my opinion.

      --
      Computer Geek Proverb: Linux is only free if your time is worthless.
    10. Re:If you really want to escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Dumbass.

    11. Re:If you really want to escape by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      well...cable may bottleneck in the fact that you have everyone on the same loop but dsl comes together at the telco and they dont guarentee bandwidth eather...just say its becuase of distance and give you an approxomite value.

      on the other hand I have cable because it costs less, I get speedy downs although my ups suck...I dont know why its hard for them to give me even HALF of what I get downstream for my uploads, I dont have a real problem with the nat and I can run a temp server for 6 or so people to play CS with no lag (although that includes me connecting through ethernet and my neighbor on the same cable loop). I am scared to leave the server running at all times though since they dont want me to and I get no uploads so it doesnt hold many people...

      I would LOVE to have a good dsl connection but as far as I can tell you have to have qwest...no thanks, I tried signing up...payed money...saw hidden charges, waited, got a box installed on the side of my house, waited, called support, got bounced from qwest.net(ISP) support to qwest(Line Provider) support and never once got the damn connection working. I was very close going with a connection through visi because they provided multiple static IP's, free dialup, excelent local support and they even happened to host one of my favorite server boxes colo for nice low pings to me (qwest.net offered NONE of these, and the lowest level service wasnt even always on),but I would still need qwest since I couldnt get a frontier line in my area and they still wanted something like $35 to give me a line (no isp), that got a 640/256 speed cap...add the visi fee to this (which was a very reasonable 19.99 for all the services they offer) and the $7 line tax and some $2 other fees I remember from the first try and it comes out to costing more than my cable connection with about 1850/200...

      --
      Bottles.
    12. Re:If you really want to escape by tuxlove · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have both cable and DSL. The cable costs $42/month and yields real throughput of up to 250k *bytes* per second. The DSL costs $120/month and comes with 5 IP addresses, at a whopping 144k *bits* per second. I live about 2000 feet too far away from the CO for real DSL, and could originally only get iDSL. I'm told I can finally get real DSL now, and it would only cost me $400/month for 1.5 megabit (about 190k bytes per second). If I want to give up having fixed IP addresses, I'd only have to pay $90/month for 1.5 megabit. What a deal! Twice as expensive as cable with no fixed IP addresses or 10 times as expensive with fixed IP.

      Because of this, almost everyone in my area has cable, and the throughput seems not to suffer. Of course, some day it might start to suck, and since there's no SLA, we'd have to live with it. But even then it will probably always beat my DSL line, hands down.

    13. Re:If you really want to escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are your experiences, good and bad?

      What's so hard to understand about that?

    14. Re:If you really want to escape by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Cellphone and wireless card for your laptop from your cellphone provider. I know Verizon offers a service for $79.99 (here in Seattle anyway) that gives you unlimited number of MB. It advertises 144kbps/sec I think, but you are going to really see about 60-90kbps, which is still a whole hell of a lot better than 28.8. I'm sure if you package that with a phone and voice minutes you could get all your data and voice for a little over $100/month. That's about the same cost with DSL, ISP and your phone line with voicemail, caller ID, etc. Although you're not running quite at 640kbps.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    15. Re:If you really want to escape by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1
      ok in what world is cable more reliable than DSL?

      It is in my world. I had SBC DSL for about one year. Even though I'm in the middle of the San Fernando Valley, I'm too far from the local office to get decent DSL service. I was getting about 600-700kbps up & down, when it was working. Disconnects were frequent, even after multiple service calls to run new wires, etc. They eventually just gave up on me and disconnected my service without even telling me first; now they have a shorter maximum distance that they're willing to install new DSL service to.

      Since then I've used Roadrunner cable. It's a very consistant 1.9mbps down & 384kbps up, even during busy evening hours. Although it's technically a static IP, I find that the IP never changes as long as I keep the modem powered up. I've had the same IP now for about 9 months, allowing me to host a few low-traffic web sites and run my own mail server. They don't seem to care if you run servers, though they do occasionally scan for open mail relays.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    16. Re:If you really want to escape by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      ok in what world is cable more reliable than DSL?

      Las Vegas, to name one example. We have both here in the office, and while there have been occasional issues with our cable-modem connection, our DSL usually only goes for a day or two before the modem needs to be reset.

      Most of the DSL problems stem from the service provider not owning the lines...they're stuck with getting problems resolved on Sprint's schedule, whatever that happens to be. Given the weirdness I've also seen with voice service, I'm not convinced that Sprint is up to keeping any type of service (voice, DSL, whatever) going reliably. Cox doesn't have to deal with another company to get line issues, etc. resolved, and when a problem does pop up (which happens much less frequently than with the DSL), it usually gets taken care of fairly quickly. 24/7 tech support for cable-modem service is also a Good Thing.

      (I should probably point out that both services are business-oriented, not the garden-variety residential service. I also have the same cable-modem service (at a lower speed level) at home. It costs no more than same-speed residential cable-modem service, but you can order static IPs for it, run whatever services you want, etc. As for speed vs. DSL, the cable modem almost always beats DSL for upstream and downstream transfers around here.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    17. Re:If you really want to escape by vtechpilot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sounds to me like you are comparing RESIDENTIAL cable to BUSINESS DSL. In which case your comparison holds true. Perhaps you should look into the costs of residential DSL before posting utter nonsense. Second If you belived the salesman that iDSL was infact DSL you are doubly confused. iDSL is really nothing more than rebranded ISDN. So comparing ISDN to cable as if it were DSL is also utter nonsense. I can only hope to prevent you from spreading this garbage to others. Oh and while I am on it. Cable isn't giving you a fixed IP for $42/month either. If I had mod points your comment would be moderated -1 Poster is Wrong.

      --
      Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    18. Re:If you really want to escape by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Informative
      ok in what world is cable more reliable than DSL?

      Probably where the cable company isn't a huge monopoly and the telco is.

      I can't honestly speak for anywhere but my locale, but here you recieve a static IP with DSL, you have a fixed guaranteed bandwidth rate up and down, it considered a business class connection with equivelent response and support, and it costs the same as cable.

      Sounds like business class DSL. Not all DSL providers offer this at reasonable rates. Many do not provide static IP with residential service.

      Cable internet on the other hand, has NO guaranteed bandwidth at all, it's 100 people on a t1

      This is a vast oversimplification. The "shared" bandwidth is usually much larger than a T-1, and really depends on how the cable company has wired your loop. Some cable companies are even running separate fiber to each house. Lest you put too much stock in DSL, bear in mind that while you may have a dedicated line between you and the CO, from that point on, you may be sharing rather congested lines with others. Obviously, business class customers will fare better.

      They also consider it theft if you use a router and nat your connection!

      Nonsense. This all depends on the cable company. My cable company allows several computers even on the residential service. They allow double-digits worth on their business class services. Guess how they recommend that you implement. NAT.

      You have agreed not to run a server of any kind.

      This frequently applies to DSL as well. I checked into it before going with cable modem.

      You have a capped upload speed that is slower than your down speed.

      You frequently see this on DSL connections, too. Particularly the residential kind.

      And for this I'm going to pay about $5/months more than DSL???

      Here, the services are about the same in cost.

      Is my area an exception or do you really think of a shared consumer grade connection as more stable than a guaranteed business class connection?

      Absolutely not. But, you have to compare apples to apples. Compare residential DSL with residential cable modem, and business DSL with business cable modem.

      I used to have business class cable modem service, and I was getting 4Mbps downstream and 3Mbps upstream, along with special DNS servers that responded faster than the residential ones. I was quite happy with this arrangement until I no longer needed those kinds of speeds. Service with my carrier has been wonderful -- although I've only had to call them with a problem once in the last couple years.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    19. Re:If you really want to escape by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      I have 1.5megabit/128kbit DSL here, with two static IPs, and no monthly bandwidth limits. $60 CDN. If I wanted to ditch the static IPs, it would be $45 CDN.

      You see, in Canada, we have a telephone monopoly, and they treat us right! (SaskTel that is).

    20. Re:If you really want to escape by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like you are comparing RESIDENTIAL cable to BUSINESS DSL. In which case your comparison holds true. Perhaps you should look into the costs of residential DSL before posting utter nonsense.

      Hmm, seems like you've got your asshole filter turned off. Try resetting it before posting further trollish defecation. As I noted in my post, if I want fixed IP addresses (which is only offered with business class service), the cost is $400 for 1.5 megabit. If you don't want fixed IP addresses (i.e. residential service), it's $90/month. That's as cheap as it gets around here.

      Second If you belived the salesman that iDSL was infact DSL you are doubly confused. iDSL is really nothing more than rebranded ISDN. So comparing ISDN to cable as if it were DSL is also utter nonsense.

      Sounds like you're assuming that because I didn't actually define iDSL in my post that I don't know what it is. Did you not notice my statement that I can now get *real* DSL, as opposed to the hokey iDSL I've had to put up with for years? That should have been your hint. But, if it will make you feel better: iDSL is simply a repackaging of ISDN, binding together the two 64kbit B channels (bearer channels) and the one 16kbit D channel (delta channel) for a grand total of 144kbit throughput. IDSL is generally used by people like me who can't get real DSL, and is marketed similarly to DSL because, from the user's standpoint, it looks pretty much the same, albeit very slow.

      [...spew omitted...] Oh and while I am on it. Cable isn't giving you a fixed IP for $42/month either [...further spew omitted...]

      Please read my posting again before emitting any further spew. Did I ever say that I was getting fixed IP addresses with my cable service? Why the hell do you think I maintain two internet connections if I could get a fixed IP address with cable? I keep the slow iDSL because I run SMTP/DNS/other services off of it. Can't do that without fixed IP addresses. But it's too damn slow for good web surfing, streaming media, games, etc., which is why I have the cable. I would dearly love to have only one internet connection that was fast, cheap, and offered fixed IP addresses. No such luck, for now.

      I think my posting well enough described the hassle one has to go through in my area to have fixed IP addresses and a nice fast connection at the same time without going totally bankrupt, and that cable isn't as horrible as some posters have indicated. I apologize (sarcasm) if my posting wasn't sufficently pedantic for you. I promise to be more precise in the future if you promise to keep your asshole post filter enabled when replying to people who are only trying to engage in reasonable discussion.

    21. Re:If you really want to escape by shaitand · · Score: 1

      yes but the parent I was replying to said more reliable, not faster.

    22. Re:If you really want to escape by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Maybe I didn't mention, here business and residential dsl are one and the same, after the taxes they cost pretty close to the same amount. The telephone company here (Illinois Consolidated), bases residential and business on the type of internet connection, their dialup is considered a residential connection, their dsl is considered a high speed business connection.

    23. Re:If you really want to escape by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Must be nice that cable's an option where you live. Our cable system (Northland Cable) is worse than BellSouth as far as customer service and support, and even worse, they do not and will not offer cable internet service. Seeing that I live in a somewhat rural area, a large percentage of the population can't get any broadband at all.

    24. Re:If you really want to escape by HunterSun · · Score: 1

      Well, as another here in South Bend, Indiana. I've had Comcast Cable formerly AT&T and outside of the switch over period when they where on @Home's network the Cable has been remarkably reliable. I've had 2-3 outages in approximately 2 years total. I've never had a problem with it running slow. Of course, that doesn't mean its good all over.

      I've been more then happy with it though as when I show people whom use DSL around here they are impressed by its regular performance. DSL adoption though in this area has been quite slow though

    25. Re:If you really want to escape by briareus · · Score: 1

      ok in what world is cable more reliable than DSL?

      Houston definitely! Are you basing all your stuff on actual real world experience or parroting theoretical specs like a lot of other geeks out there?

      Take a look around DSL Reports

    26. Re:If you really want to escape by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      their dialup is considered a residential connection, their dsl is considered a high speed business connection.

      Interesting. How much do they charge for DSL? I still have "small business" class cable modem, which carries better service at only a few $$$ more than residential. It ends up being equivalent to a T-1.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    27. Re:If you really want to escape by shaitand · · Score: 1

      it's $29.95, with taxes and other misc hidden charges it's about $45.00 + some change

      Cable is $49.95. Not sure about the taxes, etc since I don't personally have it. I service and maintain several small businesses and residential customers who do have it however.

    28. Re:If you really want to escape by vtechpilot · · Score: 1

      Sorry About all that. I am a DSL salesman and I was having a shitty day yesterday, so I took it out on you. It was wrong of me and I appologize.

      --
      Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    29. Re:If you really want to escape by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      No prob, I've had more than my share of days too.

    30. Re:If you really want to escape by ces · · Score: 1

      Your mistake was calling the locla Bell for your DSL.

      You have the option of either using an ISP that goes through a CLEC or using an ISP other than Qwest with Qwest's DSL.

      For example Speakeasy uses Covad or Worldcom for DSL service and the actual ISP parts are provided by Speakeasy. The only part Qwest would provide is the copper pair to your house and co-lo space in your local exchange for the DSLAM.

      I don't care how bloody cheap cable is I refuse to get cable unless there really is no other broadband option at my location. At least with DSL there is always some amount of choice even if a CLEC doesn't serve that exchange.

      Cable companies and telecommunications companies are both near the top of my shit list, but cable companies are still far worse in my book.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    31. Re:If you really want to escape by ces · · Score: 1

      The DSL costs $120/month and comes with 5 IP addresses, at a whopping 144k *bits* per second. I live about 2000 feet too far away from the CO for real DSL, and could originally only get iDSL. I'm told I can finally get real DSL now, and it would only cost me $400/month for 1.5 megabit (about 190k bytes per second). If I want to give up having fixed IP addresses, I'd only have to pay $90/month for 1.5 megabit. What a deal! Twice as expensive as cable with no fixed IP addresses or 10 times as expensive with fixed IP.

      Ouch. Just to make you wince in Seattle I can get 1.5M/128k DSL for $60/mo, 1.5M/384k for $80/mo, 1.5M/784k for $90/mo, and 3M/784k for $200/mo. The 3M service comes with 4 static IPs and its $10/mo extra for 2 static IPs with the other service levels. No restrictions on running servers on any of the tiers and there is a minimum SLA.

      For what its worth, except for gamers and people with servers, most home users don't really need anything more than about 384k/384k service and most will do fine with only 128k upstream. Many small and midsize technology companies don't have more than a fractional T1 (384k or 768k) shared between a couple hundred users for their offices.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    32. Re:If you really want to escape by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      well the original problem I had was the qwest dsl not the qwest isp...their support wasnt so bad (maybe all the customers just couldnt get past being pissed at qwest to be pissed at qwest.net) since qwest is still the only choice for dsl here and failed to provide service even after several months, I had to go with cable RIGHT as it got handed over to comcast...it seems alright and I havnt had any problems other than the things I wish I had (more up and the ability to host servers without violating terms)

      --
      Bottles.
    33. Re:If you really want to escape by ces · · Score: 1

      I have Speakeasy DSL over Qwest lines and I've never had to speak with Qwest about the instal at all.

      Qwest does own the loop between my house and the CO but the DSLAM and everything else is run and owned by either Covad or Speakeasy.

      Presumably if there is some issue that comes up during installation Covad or Speakeasy deal with contacts inside Qwest who have a clue. On the other hand given the cluelessness of Qwest and the comedy of errors I repeatedly witnessed while I was managing a corprate WAN this may not be the case. It's pretty absurd when the field repair guys have to deal with the same billing office morons the customers do in order to fix a problem on a line due to an improper entry on the customer order. At least going through a CLEC makes dealing with the bellheads somebody elses problem.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    34. Re:If you really want to escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what its worth, except for gamers and people with servers, most home users don't really need anything more than about 384k/384k service and most will do fine with only 128k upstream.

      Downloading 20MB pr0n videos at 384 is sooo tedious.

  2. Re:w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it isn't.

  3. Vonage... by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know it's no good for the poster of this story, but for those with cable or DSL, check out Vonage. And tell them you were referred by user timandjeni - vonage@timandjeni.com ;^)

    --
    Do not read this sig.
    1. Re:Vonage... by wheezl · · Score: 1

      Yep I use vonage too. It is scwheet. better than any POTS I have ever had. Also dumping your local bell might be one of the best feelings you ever have.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
    2. Re:Vonage... by TexTex · · Score: 1

      How's Vonage work with 911 service? It's a real interesting concept but I'm curious if they are able to tie into location-based networks for emergency services.

      --
      -Barkeep, a draft of your most hazardous brew, for the world is slowly stepping into focus, and I don't like what I see.
    3. Re:Vonage... by tdemark · · Score: 1

      Basically, when you dial 911, they forward the call to your local 911 center based upon the physical address they have on record for the device.

      - Tony

    4. Re:Vonage... by krisp · · Score: 4, Informative
      From Vonage's web page:

      Your Call Will Go To A General Access Line at the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). This is different from the 911 Emergency Response Center where traditional 911 calls go.

      * This means your call goes to a different phone number than traditional 911 calls. Also, you will need to state the nature of your emergency promptly and clearly, including your location and telephone number, as PSAP personnel will NOT have this information at hand.

      So, your 911 call doesn't exactly have traditional 911 priority, you don't speak to an operator who has your name,address and phone number on her screen, and they won't know where to send the police if your call gets disconnected.
    5. Re:Vonage... by s10god · · Score: 1

      So if your life depends on the line working, stick with a tradiotional land line???

      I was damned near burned out of home just because I did not have a passively powered phone(Main breaker blew when centeral air/heater fused its main buss). I would hate to have to rely on a powered up PC and working net connection for my life.

    6. Re:Vonage... by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Vonage service doesn't require that your PeeCee is on; the phone device itself is hooked directly to your router.

      (I don't have one, but have kept an interested eye open toward it ...)

      S

    7. Re:Vonage... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      And if your power is out this changes things how?

    8. Re:Vonage... by Cramer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (The term is "line powered".)

      ISDN is not line powered, but it's still attached to 911 service. That said, there's a difference between "life line" and "911" service. And if your house is on fire, the first thing you should do is leave; call for help from somewhere else.

    9. Re:Vonage... by s10god · · Score: 1

      Point taken...

    10. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shameless plug...

    11. Re:Vonage... by captain_craptacular · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. It's $40 a month, that sounds like an awful lot just to say you're using VOIP. I pay $15 a month for local phone and use a Sams-Club $.03 a minute phone card for long distance, so unless I talk for more than 850 minutes a month long distance this makes no sense. And even if I do there are other issues.

      In short, why is is great, or even good? What am I missing here?

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    12. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the phone companies leave phone lines installed (no charge) specifically for calling 911 and 0. This is the way it has been during my apartment hopping period.

    13. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question- how does this work if you have multiple phones? I have 5 phones at my house in different rooms. Would I get to keep all of them with Vonage?

    14. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't. This does.

    15. Re:Vonage... by unixwin · · Score: 1

      ITs better because
      1. You don't have to dial a 18 digit sams code #
      2. you dont' have to carry a card with a 18 digit sams code #
      3. you don't have to "refresh" your 18 digit sams code # everytime your card finishes specially in the middle of a conversation :)
      4. you don't have to be a sams member to get it ( you CANNOT buy it if you're not a member the walmart card is at a higher rate (around 4-6/ cents/min)
      5. wham bam sorry sam

      PS: 18 digit sams code # is a FOMI (figment of my imagination) but I guess a 18005551212 == 11 digits + a 4-6 digit pin + press 1 for englissss and 2 for se habla espaniol should be around 18 keypresses ==> yes I know there are "shortcuts" on your whiz bang phone

      --
      -- everyones not everybody and neither is everybody like everyone.
    16. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its good if you dont pay $40 first of all. There are other companies that offers the same thing for less. Secondly, yeah, you have to make lots of long distance calls for it to be worth it in addition to a normal phone line. Plus, you can do some funky stuff like choose you area code and phone number (might be good if you do lots of buisness in other area codes). Its really only worth it if you already pay for a broadband connection.

    17. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your 911 call doesn't exactly have traditional 911 priority, you don't speak to an operator who has your name,address and phone number on her screen, and they won't know where to send the police if your call gets disconnected.

      Aren't cell phones required by Federal Law to be capable of calling 911 even when they're not activated? Perhaps one could acquire an old cell phone (or more than one) and use that for 911?

    18. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a code and a saving of $24 a month anyday.

    19. Re:Vonage... by k0fcc · · Score: 1
      I've had my home phone via vonage now for several months and they are very good. We've had nothing but good luck with them. I've read on other sites that some people haven't had as nice of a time as we have.

      For the money it's a great service but you really need a minimum of 640/256 and no big filesharing running. I have a 1m T1 with vonage and about 7 computers, 3 of which running the Entropy project, which is similar to Freenet. One computer does a lot of Lotus Notes replicating on some huge files. I've had nothing but amazing successes. In fact, I was online one night downloading some 600m iso's and playing some online streaming movie previews while talking long distance (using vonage) to a friend. Everything was real time.

      As with anything your mileage may vary but this a nice service for those of us who are hooked on the internet.

    20. Re:Vonage... by unixwin · · Score: 1

      $46 is unlimited long distance calling (which includes local line and phone)
      which is equivalent to a $20 land line + $40 "unlimited" calling from SBC/ATT) = $15 saving

      and they have a $26 plan (which I'm thinking of getting) which has 500 long distance mins and unlimited local calling :)

      --
      -- everyones not everybody and neither is everybody like everyone.
    21. Re:Vonage... by mAineAc · · Score: 1

      would be nice if they had it in Maine. That would be great get unlimited long distance for 30 bucks but everyone has to call massachusettes when I am their neighbor.

    22. Re:Vonage... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      check out Vonage

      I may do so when they start allowing me to connect every handset in the house to one service.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    23. Re:Vonage... by Binestar · · Score: 1

      UPS Backup. Of course my phone is on my UPS so wouldn't be needed.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    24. Re:Vonage... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      ok, point completely gone over head here. My point is that being connected the router makes it absolutely NO more stable than if a pc was required to be up... at least not in regards to the two mentioned concerns, the pc being off and network outage.

      The only point I might be able to give you that a router would probably use less juice and thus stay up longer on a UPS? Is this what you meant? Or did you just lose track of context like I usually do when replying to something a gazillion posts deep? ;)

    25. Re:Vonage... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Not replying with the exact same answer twice, I refuse.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=68238&cid=62 49 908

    26. Re:Vonage... by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      >ITs better because
      >1. You don't have to dial a 18 digit sams code #
      No, I program speed dial in my home phone. All it takes is one memory for the 800# and the other for the options/code #

      >2. you dont' have to carry a card with a 18 digit sams code #
      No, I have used it so many times that I have *memorized* my code #. It's the 800# + 12 digits by the way.

      >3. you don't have to "refresh" your 18 digit sams code # everytime your card finishes specially in the middle of a conversation :)
      This has happened to me many times. Guess what? I can recharge it with a push of a button in less than 10 seconds. Sometimes the other party doesn't even know it happened!

      >4. you don't have to be a sams member to get it ( you CANNOT buy it if you're not a member the walmart card is at a higher rate (around 4-6/ cents/min)
      Just ask a friend or someone to get it for you. Also Sam's allows you to buy stuff for a day (a courtesy)

      >5. wham bam sorry sam
      Nope, minutes won't expire, there is no "First minute takes a quarter of your whole talking time ", and the payphone surcharge is only 10 units (about 35 cents) which could be CHEAPER than some payphones that ask you to put in 50 cents for a local call!

    27. Re:Vonage... by Cokelee · · Score: 3, Informative
      So, your 911 call doesn't exactly have traditional 911 priority, you don't speak to an operator who has your name,address and phone number on her screen, and they won't know where to send the police if your call gets disconnected.

      You must realize that if you have a telephone jack in your house you may dial 911. 911 is a public service and requires NO telephone company. So why would you use Vonage to dial 911 when you can from a local land line for free???

    28. Re:Vonage... by wheezl · · Score: 1

      Hmm I have 4 phones hooked up to mine. If you are refering to multiple simultaneous lines though you do need more boxes.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
    29. Re:Vonage... by wheezl · · Score: 1

      I can say I pull out all the stops with filesharing.. I have No Problems now that I switched the firewall/nat from that crappy netgear box to a freebsd box and ipfilter. It might also help that I have 1.5Mbit speakeasy dsl but the firewall was the difference.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
    30. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need more boxes.

      Simply wire a CAT 5 cable with an RJ-12 connector and run it from the Vongage ATA to the demarc telephone box on the side of your house. One side of the box is for the phone company and the other is what goes to the house telephone wiring.

      Once you plug in the line from the Vonage ATA, you will now have telephone access throughout your house.

    31. Re:Vonage... by wheezl · · Score: 1

      Well you doo need more boxes if you want multiple simultaneous phone connections. otherwise you are correct.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
    32. Re:Vonage... by tuxlove · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if your house is on fire, the first thing you should do is leave; call for help from somewhere else.

      Our local fire dept. representative tells me that you are supposed to dial 911 first thing, then leave. Just dial the number and drop the phone. The 911 dispatcher is supposed to give priority to calls where the person on the other end does not respond after calling. And they don't have to ask for your location, it's already on their screen. This will get you the fastest response possible, and does not delay your exit more than a few seconds. Of course, if you can't find the phone, you might want to go to plan B and just leave.

    33. Re:Vonage... by alizard · · Score: 1

      Only works if somebody is paying someone at the other end of the local loop for the dial tone. If you move into a place that's been vacant for a few months and the landlord didn't decide to pick up the tab for access, don't expect dial tone.

    34. Re:Vonage... by phylus · · Score: 1

      It is my understanding that even if you do not have phone service, the phone line is your house is still wired. I know when I didn't have service I still got a dialtone, but I couldn't dial anything.

      I believe the phone company (landline) still has to provide 911 service, even to disconnected lines. So, you could always just have a phone or two still connected to the landline if you need to call 911 and don't want to use Vonage.

    35. Re:Vonage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got Vonage about 3 months ago...I love it and think it is well worth the $26 a month. In NYC you get charged 10.5 cents per local call (peak hours). I was getting raped by Verizon before with $60 phone bills of just local calls!!

    36. Re:Vonage... by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      No. If your life depends on communication, buy and carry (and I mean EVERYWHERE) a cellular phone.

      It is the tool that, if used properly, can be one of the most effective urban survival tools in the world, but it does no good away from you. I carry it even in my own home, only taking it off when it's on the desk next to me. If I somehow became injured and unable to walk to a phone in my own home, I have a cell phone.

      A landline can be cut, but with a dual-mode cell phone, really, the only time when it can be unavailable is when it is away from you, or off, two things you can always prevent.

      --
      -twb
    37. Re:Vonage... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Hmm I have 4 phones hooked up to mine.

      I sent an e-mail to Vonage asking about this possibility. They told me that while technically feasible, they wouldn't support it. IE, if I have problems, I'm on my own. According to them, the limitation is imposed by the manufacturer of the box. I never pursued it enough to find out exactly why the limitation was there. As I recall, I once had similar recommendations from the phone company for ISDN. I chose to ignore them and wired the entire house to my TA.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    38. Re:Vonage... by wheezl · · Score: 1

      Yeah I don't believe the cisco box technically supports it. I asked them and got the same response you did, But I can say I hooked it up to the 4 phones and it's been that way for a year with no problems.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
    39. Re:Vonage... by op00to · · Score: 1

      A disconnected line is just that -- one that has no connection. It isn't like a cell phone -- there's no electrical connection from your phone line to the telco at some point. It's pretty tough to dial 911 when there's no juice coming down the line...

    40. Re:Vonage... by ces · · Score: 1

      Also dumping your local bell might be one of the best feelings you ever have.

      I don't know, telling Comcast to get lost after I got DirectTV felt pretty good.

      Around here Qworst and Verizon both suck but Comcast and Millenium suck more.

      As it stands I only have the cheapest POTS as my CLEC for DSL wants to do line-sharing. Its also useful as a backup for my cell.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    41. Re:Vonage... by ces · · Score: 1

      So if your life depends on the line working, stick with a tradiotional land line???

      I was damned near burned out of home just because I did not have a passively powered phone(Main breaker blew when centeral air/heater fused its main buss). I would hate to have to rely on a powered up PC and working net connection for my life.


      Or more to the point, stick with a traditional land line with a traditional phone.

      I've got a couple a couple of old Western Electric phones plugged into the line here because they will work as long as the phone line is working. The mechanical ringer with real bells is nice too.

      I always wonder about people who have as their only phone a cordless that requires AC power to the base station in order to work. They are going to be screwed when the power goes out It sort of reminds me of people who only have an electric can opener. As an area that is subject to windstorms and earthquakes this is stupid. Most of the suburban areas around here have experienced a power outage of more than 24 hours in the last 12 years.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    42. Re:Vonage... by ces · · Score: 1

      Not so, phone companies are required to accept 911 calls on lines that are disconnected, at least in this state.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    43. Re:Vonage... by ces · · Score: 1

      Depends, there are LD carriers out there that will give you ulimited long distance for $20/month or less. My housemate has some service as her "dial 1" carrier that offers flat-rate LD for $18/month or so.

      For me it's not really a good deal as I only have to pay for airtime for LD calls to the US or Canada on my cell phone.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  4. saveonphone.com by TexTex · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out http://www.saveonphone.com. They've got a listing of some of the top alternate carriers with their basic stats listed. Many of these use the same lines as major carriers so you're not necessarily getting a lower-quality service.

    Maybe of these can switch your local and long distance. I went with Total Call International due to the cheap intrastate rates...which often are more expensive than LD rates. And they bill every 6 seconds with no monthly fee. So when MCI called to earn my love back and I told 'em the rates, the rep said

    "Oh...well, yeah. You got us beat." ...ken

    --
    -Barkeep, a draft of your most hazardous brew, for the world is slowly stepping into focus, and I don't like what I see.
    1. Re:saveonphone.com by Tyrdium · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Oh...well, yeah. You got us beat."

      This ought to be setting off alarms for people using MCI. It seems (to me, at least) that they simply don't care enough about a single customer to even try to keep them. The good thing about smaller companies is that they need your business, so chances are you'll get better customer service than with a larger telco.

    2. Re:saveonphone.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This ought to be setting off alarms for people using MCI. It seems (to me, at least) that they simply don't care enough about a single customer to even try to keep them. The good thing about smaller companies is that they need your business, so chances are you'll get better customer service than with a larger telco.
      Two red flags for smaller companies - they could be gone in a month, leaving you stranded; if you switch to another company later on, you stand a good chance of getting "slammed" afterwards.

    3. Re:saveonphone.com by moehoward · · Score: 1

      I use TCI. I love TCI. TCI resells Qwest. I don't like Qwest.

      TCI answers their phones, and has empowered customer service folks. A couple quirks on billing early on where they were not doing the auto-credit card if your bill was under $6 or something. But, now they do the charge no matter what. They are dirt cheap and they don't have any stupid fees, no matter how little you use.

      I simply don't understand why people aren't using them more.

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    4. Re:saveonphone.com by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Funny. MCI was like the original internet big ISP. And thats exactly what was said 5-7 years ago. MCI was too big to provide good customer service in the ISP business like local ISPs could.

    5. Re:saveonphone.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of these use the same lines as major carriers so you're not necessarily getting a lower-quality service.

      In fact, most of these are using the major carrier's lines, so you're getting the same service.

    6. Re:saveonphone.com by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      I work for MCI, in a customer service call center. (Though what I say here is my own personal opinion; I don't speak for the company.) From what they tell us, that rep wasn't doing his job properly. Since, even if the other company does have a better rate, we're still supposed to try offering a promotion, like free Saturdays or some amount off their next invoice, to get them to switch anyway.

      It's too bad, really, that I don't use land-line phone and don't make that many long distance calls; I'd be happy to use MCI's $50-60 (not including taxes & surcharges) Neighborhood Complete plan that makes every call in the USA the equivalent in cost of a local call. (Especially since, for $50 on top of that, I could get 256kilobit/1.5 megabit DSL, iffenwhen it becomes available in my area, and I would also get a $25/mo discount for MCI service.) But I don't really call that much, and it'd be ridiculous to spend that amount of money on a landline when I already get free LD with my cellphone.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  5. Re:w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...It's summer!

    Not in Australia you insensitive clod!

  6. Personally... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use Vonage as my non-cell phone. However this is because I do have a Cable modem connection. So this is no help to you.

    If you can live with the Cell phone for phone service, you might want to look to DirectWay, or StarBand (or others) to provide Internet service. Response times might not be as fast as dialup, but even with fair use caps, you will probably get better data rates than dialup.

    Good luck.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
    1. Re:Personally... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I use Vonage as my non-cell phone. However this is because I do have a Cable modem connection.

      I've seen their ads locally. But can you put their VOIP modem behind a NAT router?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Personally... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      It's not a modem. It's a terminal adapter. And it runs standard SIP, so any SOHO router you didn't pick out of the trash bin and spent more than $10 on should work.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:Personally... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      o any SOHO router you didn't pick out of the trash bin and spent more than $10 on should work.

      I assume this also goes for a linux 2.2 box running ipchains as a NAT/MASQ router?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:Personally... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      I assume this also goes for a linux 2.2 box running ipchains as a NAT/MASQ router?

      You can keep assuming, or check if your setup is SIP aware. I have no idea, as I don't think that PCs belong where firewalls are supposed to go.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    5. Re:Personally... by kcurrie · · Score: 1

      Yes, should work fine.
      Worst case is that you need to portforward some ports, although with a proper stateful (2.4 series) firewall you're good to go.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself.
    6. Re:Personally... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      I have a Linksys AP Broadband Router, with the Cisco TA, directly connected to one of the hub ports. The Linksys is doing NAT against several devices in my apartment, including the TA.

      A lot of questions are addressed at the vonage web site. When I signed up for vonage I did have a linux box (debian, kernel 2.2.something) acting as my NAT gateway, and never had a problem.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    7. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vonage.. heh
      I suggest you begin to look for an alternative solution. My buddy just interviewed there. They are a mess. They only have 25k customers and spend WAY more then they bring in. I highly doubt they will last 6 more months... and they abuse the crap out of their SA's and dont pay them squat.

  7. One of the best things about Washington, DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the huge calling area. I can call large chunks of DC, Virginia and Maryland for free. Guess it pays to have so many lawmakers living within those zones.

    1. Re:One of the best things about Washington, DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the huge calling area. I can call large chunks of DC, Virginia and Maryland for free. Guess it pays to have so many lawmakers living within those zones.

      Amen brotha! DC! w00t!

    2. Re:One of the best things about Washington, DC by caryw · · Score: 1

      Very true. If you shell out an extra couple bucks for a "metro line" you can call even further at the price of a local call.

      Nice perk.

  8. Get the cell by Alethes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd get the cell for all the voice calls and just keep a very cheap, basic landline service with no long distance plan just for your internet access (assuming your ISP is a local call).

    1. Re:Get the cell by s10god · · Score: 1

      I would hardly call $35 a month CHEAP.... granted I pay $8 for Call ID... The only cheap part is the $5.95 i pay for unlimited dialup.

      AND WHEN THE HELL ARE WE GOING TO STOP PAYING FOR THE SPANISH AMERICAN WAR!!!?!?!?!??!

    2. Re:Get the cell by sridev · · Score: 1

      I just use my cell phone now for all voice calls and connect to the internet thru Cable. Sprint cell phone service is not too good, but they are cheap with my company discount..

      Got a good international dialing plan with a calling card kind of provider (Cytus) where the phone number and pin number (you choose it) remain the same and they charge your credit card / bank account periodically. Now net2phone also offers this service.

      This is the best, anyway I wasn't using my landline phone much - just got junk marketing calls! I save $25-30 every month.

    3. Re:Get the cell by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I've never quite understood this. If your cellphone deals in America are so good (over here, landlines are actually still cheaper to dial out on - no unmetered call options for mobiles), and quality is about as good as a 28.8k line (it is, isn't it?), then why not use the *cellphone* for dialup internet access? Need a dedicated talkie phone? Get 2 cellphones?

    4. Re:Get the cell by ces · · Score: 1

      I would hardly call $35 a month CHEAP.... granted I pay $8 for Call ID... The only cheap part is the $5.95 i pay for unlimited dialup.

      Yell at your PUC. I only pay $20/mo for a basic landline. and Caller ID is only $5/mo.

      AND WHEN THE HELL ARE WE GOING TO STOP PAYING FOR THE SPANISH AMERICAN WAR!!!?!?!?!??!

      Huh? what are you talking about?

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    5. Re:Get the cell by s10god · · Score: 1

      AND WHEN THE HELL ARE WE GOING TO STOP PAYING FOR THE SPANISH AMERICAN WAR!!!?!?!?!??!

      Huh? what are you talking about?

      http://freedom.house.gov/library/itfa/spanish.as p

      http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/phon e_ tax000525.html

    6. Re:Get the cell by ces · · Score: 1

      Oh my. I never realized that is what the Federal Exise Tax on long distance was about.

      Yes, I agree that its time w stopped paying for the Spanish-American war.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  9. McLeodUSA by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mcleod is available throughout much of the midwest and doesn't completely suck. I've been with them for about two and a half years now and haven't had any major problems with 'em. They offer all the same services as Ameritech/SBC/whatever and cost a little less. And local calls are just that, local no extra charge. I'd never even heard of "local toll calls" before reading this article.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:McLeodUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll stay anonymous for this posting ;)

      i switched from qwest to mcleod usa (i'm in the denver, co area).

      i've never experience bad phone service before that. you know how you normally can just pick up a phone and call someone, not so with mcleod. it was amazing, the service was intermitent at best.

      i had to switch back to qwest.

    2. Re:McLeodUSA by BobKagy · · Score: 1

      I've been happy with McLeodUSA for the past year after I switched because SBC couldn't figure out how to charge a credit card and MCI hit me with hidden charges. Not sure what will happen soon, as Illinois just passed a law to allow SBC to charge another $10/month per subscriber so they don't lose so many customers.

    3. Re:McLeodUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have McLeod in Champaign, Illinois. It seems to work just as well as Ameritech, which I had before. However, a while back they wouldn't allow me to sign up with out a credit card, while Ameritech would. Also, the Flexabit internet access I get with it has a 500MB/day download cap, which isn't so hot, but the speed is quite good. Overall, it costs me about $10-15 less per month than Ameritech local service + cable modem or DSL would. Alas, I think I will be dropping local phone service, as I don't really use it much, and prefer the comfortable public pseudo-anonymity of pay phones.

    4. Re:McLeodUSA by echo465 · · Score: 1

      FYI, McleodUSA is emerging from bankruptcy, and might have trouble finding financing in the near future. Hasn't affected my company's SDSL service with them yet though.

    5. Re:McLeodUSA by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Also using McLeodUSA (I'm in the intermountain west area). They're a bit lamebrained at times when I do have issues like questions on billing charges, there's no savings, Qwest makes the service calls, and when I dial '0', I get a Qwest operator. The long distance packages they offer don't work for me (I have an hour per month at most, on average, so a no-minimum, no-surcharge, per-minute package was what I found via abelltolls.com), and the calling area for local free calls is the same as Qwest's.

      All told, I feel I took a teensy hit in QOS by the tradeover (2+ years ago), but I am ok with that because I long ago decided that certain corporations would never get another dime from me than I could let them. Qwest was at the top of that list, so I was happy to wean myself off.

      Interestingly, a local ISP is offering Vonage-like VOIP service and if I could JUST talk my wife into it, that'd be fine. I declined on Vonage because I couldn't get a local number, which means 95% of my phone usage would become a toll call. That was a total nonstarter...

      Sorry I can't remember the ISP's name, but I recommend just checking all the ISP's.

      As for lackin' broadband, WTF were you doin' buying a house without paying attention to this detail?! That's like not lookin' to see if there's indoor plumbing! And you call yourself a slashdotter...

    6. Re:McLeodUSA by Sunthalazar · · Score: 1

      Just as an FYI, in general there are local calls, local toll calls, and long distance toll calls.
      The general idea is that calls to the same city are local, calls within the state are local toll, and calls everywhere else are long-distance toll.
      Why do they make that distinction? I have no idea, but I know from signing up for "long-distance" service, they frequently also ask you if you want your local-toll calls covered as well.
      It has been a while since I've done this, though, since I switched to using my cell phone for all long distance, and got rid of the long distance on my land line. We kept the land-line to make international calls through a calling card.

  10. i live in st. louis by honold · · Score: 2, Informative

    and the largest bell 'competitor' around here is birch telecom. they compete on price and service, but afaik still use sbc's line facilities. due to anti-monopoly laws, they're forced to allow this.

    i've never used their residential service but i know of some small businesses that use them and were pleased with the service.

    1. Re:i live in st. louis by tedtimmons · · Score: 1
      birch telecom

      ..not to be confused with Bitch Telecom.



      -ted

    2. Re:i live in st. louis by sloveless · · Score: 1

      I, too, live in the St. Louis area. I've used Birch for residential service in the past. Their customer service is (or at least was) excellent, their prices were very competitive, and it was easier to get an SBC tech out for repairs going through folks at Birch than it is to go through the maddening red tape at SBC. No residential DSL through Birch, though. They apparently don't have provisioning rights. So I've had to switch back to SBC - Charter still won't offer Pipeline in my area. In some areas outside of St. Louis county, specifically St. Charles and St. Peters, Charter offers voice, as well as TV and internet.

      My recommendation is to go with Birch if they offer service in your area and you're not in need of DSL.

      One last thing. When I switched back to SBC, they offered me a slightly lower rate than what they normally charge new customers. If you explain to them that you're going to go with a competitor, they might give you a break in price. Good luck.

  11. We prefer our monopoly were I live... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..they are friendly, flexible and bastards all rolled into one.

  12. Earthlink Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I know it's just resold starband or something, but i know a couple friends with earthlink's satellite service. They like it pretty much; as long as you can get around poor customer support, usb modem (w/o linux drivers), high setup cost (around $550 here), and the possibility of them dropping the service altogether(high likelyhood?)

    I believe they're getting around 256k-400k speeds up and down

    1. Re:Earthlink Satellite by burnsy · · Score: 1
      Not a chance on the 256-400K down...

      Q: What sort of upload speed can I expect? (#2000)

      A: Generally consumer grade satellite broadband systems are advertised with upload speeds of "up to" 128kbs. One way systems come with no upload speed predictions.

      In actual use, at least at this time, none of the consumer grade two-way satellite systems get upload speeds near the 128kbs suggestion. There is a wide variance in actual upload speeds from moment to moment. You can expect that most of the time the upload speed of a two way system will be in the 30kbs-80kbs range. Due to latency issues with satellite connections, most upload speed tests will show speeds lower than actual FTP uploads.

    2. Re:Earthlink Satellite by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter what the Q&A says... Up until a couple months ago I had a cable connection that advertised 128k download speeds and there was rarely a time when I got LESS than 128, often much much faster.

      --
      sig.
    3. Re:Earthlink Satellite by shaitand · · Score: 1

      ok so you get 128k UP, maybe. What does that have to do with whether or not you get 200-400K DOWN?

  13. And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by Lysol · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use my cell exclusively for voice. So when I needed static IPs for my servers, and thusly DSL, I called up the good 'ol local monopoly, er, I mean, phone provider here in nyc - Verizon - and it was a whopping $19 for me to just have a line. I told the Verizon lady, no caller id, no long distance, no nothing - there will never be a phone hoooked up to it.

    Turns out, the Verizon charge is about $9 and the other $10 are taxes. But still, it's a rip. That means if every citizen in nyc has a land line, there's gonna be at least $100,000,000 in tax revenue. A month! How about a tax break on that?

    1. Re:And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by wheezl · · Score: 1

      I must agree this is total BS. I don't have cable to my building here in Brooklyn and had to get DSL (this wasn't so traumatic since SpeakeasyDSL has to be better than any crap ass cable provider) the extra $20 a month for a phone line I never use really blows though. However the $20 plus the $40 for Vonage turns out to be less monthly than Verizon was screwing me for anyway.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
    2. Re:And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      I'm somewhat lucky that my building is pre-wired for Verizon's DSL internet (read: ethernet jacks on the walls) in NYC, so I don't have to sign up for a blasted land voice line (I was researching it, and, sure enough, the rates+taxes are incredibly high!). I just use my cell phone for talking ... Do DSL providers usually require voice subscription?

    3. Re:And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They usually do, although it is VERY possible to have DSL and no phone line. You don't need an active dial tone for DSL to work, but the phone company would like you to think you do, which is why most often, they will not provide DSL without local phone service.

    4. Re:And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by wheezl · · Score: 1

      Many DSL providers use shared line ADSL, if I could aford SDSL I would get that since it does not require a prexisting phone line.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
    5. Re:And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      Local Vermont ISP Sovernet charges $50 a month for a DSL serivce to the NID (Network Interface Device). No additional monthly charge for the circuit all you need for internal wiring is a spare phone line that doesn't have DT (dial tone) on it, or you need to extend the circuit to a phone jack if both phone lines are already being used.

    6. Re:And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SoverNet sucks ass.. go with a real ISP.

    7. Re:And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Technically, only about $4 of that $10 would be taxes; $6 of it would be the Network Access Fee, which is not a tax but a flat fee that anyone who has a phone line ends up paying. It compensates the local company for the cost of maintaining the hardware that makes up the phone network.

      Another good reason to have no landline whatsoever and go with cablemodem.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    8. Re:And just try get a 'dry' line for dsl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can i lick your ass?

  14. talk america by anthonyclark · · Score: 2, Informative

    Talk America gives us good service. We pay 50 bucks / month for unlimited local and long distance (within SE Michigan). It's cheap to call my Mum in the UK. The only problem we have is that ameritech used to 'pulse' the dialtone to tell us we had voicemail.

    --
    ----- Documentation is worth it just to be able to answer all your mail with 'RTFM' - Alan Cox.
  15. Sprint PCS by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out the "Vision" service from Sprint. It's an extra $10 a month for unlimited usage. There is a USB data cable which lets your sprint phone (I have a Sanyo 4900) work as a USB modem - and yes, it works with Linux. The Sprint Vision service gives you a digital connection at about 56k.

    They don't advertise it any more and they don't sell the cable any more. Check ebay for the cable and make sure you have a compatible phone.

    Here's a HOWTO for it.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:Sprint PCS by leinerj · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a sprint phone with the Vision plan, but BE AWARE they do charge you for the connection to a laptop with your phone. Any sales rep will tell you its free, but check your bill. They want you to purchase a pcmcia data card instead. The reason I signed up with them was for the unlimited data rate with my laptop, but it only applies to web ON your phone.

    2. Re:Sprint PCS by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      An extra $10/mo for unlimited is a pretty good deal. AT&T's data plans go from $7.99/mo for 1MB transfer to $99.99/mo for 100MB transfer. Speed is a little faster than 56K dialup. Forget that.

      If you can deal with the 14.4K speed, even old school 2G CDMA phones can do dialup with a data cable. It uses your airtime minutes though, so I hope you have free night and weekends.

    3. Re:Sprint PCS by ehudokai · · Score: 1

      >> but check your bill OK, just did, and no charges for the vision service that I have used on my phone out the WAZOO since I got it in May! I have it setup to dial #777 on my linux laptop through the phone.. and it works GREAT!!! 128kb connection speeds minimum... don't know what your talking about when you say that you get charged for them.. but, I don't see it.

      --
      This is just sig!
    4. Re:Sprint PCS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may not charge extra, but the TOS doesn't allow for "unlimited PC usage." I've used it, it's OK, but the connection tends to freeze/drop, and it compresses images to the point of being unusable.

      I think there's fixes for both of these -- just my $.02.

    5. Re:Sprint PCS by phylus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You will also get your service yanked for this.

      I have heard of people who were obviously using their cell phone as a modem, which is not allowed in their ToS.

      Sprint will basically tell you to either buy their real data connection with those Merlin cards ($100 a month I believe), or pay for all the bandwidth you used (1 or 2c/kb I believe).

      I would not recommend going the "PCS Vision through Cell Phone to computer" route unless you're very courageous/stupid.

      If you absolutely have to, and don't want a local line at all, use the $100 Sprint Wireless Data modems. You can actually pull about 12-13 k/s typically (for me at least) off of them, with about modem latency (200-350 pings).

    6. Re:Sprint PCS by WaysideWeasle · · Score: 1

      There is also a PCMCIA card that you can purchase from Sprint (not sure if it works with Linux) that works with the Vision service. A friend of mine at work reported speeds of around 112k. Not bad considering that is slightly slower than ISDN rates at a fraction of the cost.

  16. t-mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't know if t-mobile is available out there, but I heard they now offer a $20 unlimited data option, so you could use your cell phone for internet access.

    1. Re:T-Mobile by thempstead · · Score: 1
      This idea works fine with Windows XP too ... I've used a T68i combined with a 3com bluetooth card in my Dell laptop to access the web to get route planning information whilst on trips before now.

      ... I havent had a chance to try it under linux yet, (although the Dell does dual boot so its just a question of having time to try it out...)


      Tim

    2. Re:T-Mobile by baumanj · · Score: 1
      T-Mobile has an internet service plan that is about $20 for unlimited access, I think.

      It's actually $30, which includes 300 SMS messages, but no talk time. So basically you have to add this to your existing cell plan (which is at least $30 if you use your phone at all). This is better than it used to be. Previously they had no unlimited plan, and even the 5MB plan was about $20/mo. Still, I can't get myself to pay $30 more every month just to use GPRS with my Treo, cool though it may be.

      Now, if they came out with some sort of package deal that included some talk time, or better yet a deal where X minutes == X MB and you could just draw them both from a total pool, that would be great.

      --
      "The general contract of the method run is that it may take any action whatsoever." -- Java 2 API
  17. Hey I got sprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just baught a Sayno 9700 from Sprint, with a 45 dollar unlimited nights and weekends/300 anytimes/unlimited vision.

    Now the cool thing about this phone is that you can hook it up to your linux box using a USB cable (search on google.. i got the gogamic cable), and you can have a broad band connection via your phone. It's great, I get about 15-50 Kbps now. It sure beats dialup, the speed is fast, but what's bad is the latency, I get over 400-600 ms latency (due to the obvious reasons).

    Maybe you should try it, I'm close to the St.Louis area too (in illinois).

    1. Re:Hey I got sprint by shaitand · · Score: 1

      umm dialup is 56kbps, which is better than 15-50kbps, perhaps you meant 15-50kbytes?

  18. Smoke signals by heldlikesound · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mind you the through-put is about 1b/s.

    Good luck Kimosabi!

    --


    Cloud City Digital: DVD Production at its cheapest/finest
    1. Re:Smoke signals by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      I'd upgrade to the drums. It's really worth the extra expense!

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Smoke signals by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      But you get almost zero latency!

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
  19. Color me confused.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "25 minutes out of St. Louis", and yet you're in "the sticks"?

    1. Re:Color me confused.... by CadmannWeyland · · Score: 1

      That's one of the great things (if you like it that way) about St. Louis. The city itself is moderate in size, surrounded by lots of urban stuff. But if you go 25 miles south, or 45 miles west, you're in the sticks.

      Works for me anyway. Get to work in good tech community, and get back to nature on the drive home.

      :-)

      Cadmann

  20. You could try satelite by jrl87 · · Score: 1

    I know its not great, but it is better than dial-up in the booneys, I know. But depending on your dial up provider it can be about the same cost as the phone line bill + the internet service bill.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:You could try satelite by StarTux · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I am heading into the same situation. Retreating from busy areas, just too much agro :).

      Checked satellite, buts kind of expensive and fails to work with:

      Online games
      Linux

      If those two were covered we'd be ok with Satellite, but that latency and lack of Linux support is a killer. What I mean by Linux support does not equate to offical support, just that yu plug in and setup as you would witha static IP on DSL.

    2. Re:You could try satelite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DirecTV offical support for Linux

      -Dave J

    3. Re:You could try satelite by rabert · · Score: 1

      With directpc you can set up a router/firewall/hub running win2k ( they even have a box you can buy ready to go ) and connect the rest of your lan to it, thereby running any OS you want. I have some friends who have 2 Macs, and they use a win2k box as their router. ( Even when the router had become filled with trojan programs and virii, the macs remained unaffected and worked just fine. We did fix the win2k box, though )

      The only real problem with satellite is the lag time, making voip impossible, and microsoft VPN unworkable. I think that SSH would still work , however.

  21. CLEC types and features by ZPO · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a few basic kinds of CLECs (competitive local exchange carriers).

    1 - Local Facilities based: The CLEC has an independent CO (switch site) in the local area and can either extend facilities to you (not likely unless you are buying 2-4 DS1s+ of service) or extend POTS/DSL/DS1 service via copper loops from the closest LEC (local exchange carrier - the old baby bell) exchange.

    2 - Non-Local Facilities Based: The CLEC's switch is located somewhere else and simply trunked into the area. They CLEC may or may not have direct colocation in the LEC's COs.

    3 - Reseller: The CLEC just takes your order and passes it to the LEC to fulfill. Its still the LECs lines, switch, numbers, etc.

    There are also myriad variations on the above. In general if you can get service from a local facilities based CLEC go for it. Most of them aren't really setup for residential (not profitable), but you may get lucky in your area.

  22. Cell and Satelite by rlgines · · Score: 1

    Well I'm 45 miles outside of St. Louis so I have a similar issue (yep I drive in every day). We use the local phone company only for having minimal connection to the wired world if necessary. Most of my phone time is spent on my cell phone while in St. Louis (my cell wont even work where I live ). For Internet access I am using Starband with WinProxy as the gateway for my home network of ten PCs (yep our family has LAN gaming parties every once in a while).

    This is far from an ideal setup, but is all that is available. It is the small price that I pay for being able to live on my own littel piece of paradise away from the noise and congestion of civilization ... the nearest Walmart is over 20 miles away.)

    Good luck. If you get cell service okay where you live, I would just go with that and a satelite connection.

  23. AT&T by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    Company uses a couple PRI's from AT&T for local phone service. They provide the service, but the local loop still belongs to SBC. We got a pretty good rate due to our volume. Install support when we switched over was incompetent to say the least, but no problems since then.

    No matter who you use, they'll still end up reselling the local loop from the baby bell. Only exceptions I know are if you get phone service over digital cable TV or VoIP like Vonage.

  24. ComCast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in the NW Burbs of Chicago and recently switched from SBC to ComCast when I moved. I have ComCast for cable-modem and cable-TV so I thought having them for phone would be good as well.

    However, they have been very expensive. It is a toll call to call just about anywhere and they charge up to $0.07 per minute for what used to be a local call under SBC. Furthermore, they require that you buy callpacks in minutes rather than flat pricing per call and they charge enough for the by-the-minute callpack that you have to use all your minutes before you save.

    Customer service is rude and they charge you $5 to change any item on your plan.

    Last month my phone bill was almost $70 and I didn't make a single call that wouldn't have been local on my old SBC plan that costs about $35 a month.

    Anyhow, I am thinking about switching to "The Neighborhood" by MCI. Supposed $49.95 a month plus some taxes but no surprises and unlimited local and unlimited (US-only) long distance.

  25. Re:Cell Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    use your cellphone unless you talk as much as a girl & have to have a landline.

    I know some folks are lazy on here, but is the comment really too big to read fully?

    I'd dump my landline entirely and get another cell if I didn't need it for dial up internet, since I live in the sticks and there is no cable, no DSL, and the top speed for dialup is 28.8.

  26. Investigate before you move by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Too late for you, but checking into all aspects of a new area are part of my moving process.

    Broadband important? Choose a neighborhood that is supported by broadband. Don't move to where there is none, and then bitch about it.

    Local phone service not up to par? Well...that's another decision point in the move.

    "I've moved....and discovered..." does not count.
    If it is important to you, find thse things out before you move.

    1. Re:Investigate before you move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and pompous assholes don't count either. *And* they are killing Slashdot. Theres things like schools, spouse's job etc. to consider. Just because you've only had your own sweaty nerd self to consider. This is Ask Slashdot, not, "who can be the most annoying "told you so"".

    2. Re:Investigate before you move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha. Amen.

    3. Re:Investigate before you move by shaitand · · Score: 1

      No kidding, when I decided to move I made sure there apartments available within highspeed areas before I looked at anything else. There are other considerations, rent, is it a slum, has it been condemned, have I located employement within the area, have the last 7 tenents died in drive by's, etc. But surely anyone can see those are minor compared to whether or not the apartment is within the service area of a broadband provider.

  27. alternate phone companies are a bad joke by potsmaster · · Score: 1

    for the past couple years, i've been using rcn rather than sbc/pacbell for my local dialtone (650 area code). during that time, i've been paying a "local number portability fee" to -er- somebody. i recently moved about seven blocks. rcn doesn't provide service at my new location so i switched to att. could i move my phone number? ha!

    to continue my subject line: unfortunately, the incumbent phone company (sbc/pacbell) is even worse and will never get me back as a directly-paying customer...

    --
    REPORT ALL OBSCENE MESSAGES TO YOUR POTSMASTER
    1. Re:alternate phone companies are a bad joke by arkanes · · Score: 1

      It's probably too late, but if they give you ANY sort of hassle about keeping the number, raise bloody hell. Demand to speak to supervisors, file complaints with the BBB and FCC - the whole works. That number portability fee is to compensate them for a federal mandate on portability - don't let them get it for free!

    2. Re:alternate phone companies are a bad joke by NickDngr · · Score: 2, Informative

      for the past couple years, i've been using rcn rather than sbc/pacbell for my local dialtone (650 area code). during that time, i've been paying a "local number portability fee" to -er- somebody. i recently moved about seven blocks. rcn doesn't provide service at my new location so i switched to att. could i move my phone number? ha!

      Number portability means being able to keep the same number in the same location when you switch providers. It does not cover moving service to a different location.

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    3. Re:alternate phone companies are a bad joke by potsmaster · · Score: 1

      Number portability means being able to keep the same number in the same location when you switch providers. It does not cover moving service to a different location.

      ah! but i tried to switch providers beforehand to enable att to move my phone. no dice. between themselves, rcn and att cannot provide number portability...

      the helpful service agents at both companies said i could switch back to pacbell and then switch again to att. and pay pacbell a $40 reconnection fee? my life!

      --
      REPORT ALL OBSCENE MESSAGES TO YOUR POTSMASTER
  28. Astound cable, internet, and phone by Archfeld · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are small, only in Calif and Minn. but there service is fully fiber to the house, they offer phone, cable, and TV at SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER prices than COMCRAP and they offer a better selection of channels. The only downside is the phone is not self powered like the old landline princess phones on a ma-bell connection. So when the power goes out, your phone is out as well :(
    but I've got a cell for emergencies like that.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Astound cable, internet, and phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that looks really cool. I'm planning to move to the Walnut Creek area in a couple weeks, now I'll know where I have to find an apartment, so I can get this.

    2. Re:Astound cable, internet, and phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put your cable modem on a UPS and you are all set !

    3. Re:Astound cable, internet, and phone by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      The phone line is seperated from the cable line at the fiber box...EVERY COMPONENT gets a dedicated line...they don't mess around :)

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  29. I also live in St. Louis. by iamwoodyjones · · Score: 1

    I agree that prices out here suck! However, with a friend working in SBC, I have to give his why on why they charge so much.

    The government is allowing others to taxi off of SBC's line to be "competitive". They tell SBC what they can charge these people for while these other companies are using their lines to make money. However, SBC owns the lines and when maintance comes around they have to go out and incur the costs of fixing it when it's not even theirs.

    So, they charge extra where they can. Also, the same goes for DSL. Even with Charter as their competitor SBC has to share their DSL with third parties but Charter doesn't have to share their cable. That's why they've slowed down on the roll out of DSL. The more they roll out, the more they get penalized by having to share it.

    So, in retrospect, if SBC rolls out lines (tele or internet) then they have to share it with others who didn't have to pay the cost of rolling it out or the cost of maintance.

    However, charter doesn't and yet SBC is trying to stay competitive with them.

    1. Re:I also live in St. Louis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Aww, let's all feel sorry for SBC together. Why don't they cut their CEO's pay down by 1/80th, to, say, a measely million a year ? That should free up $79 million dollars with which they can install DSL for everyone in Missouri who still doesn't have it, and in just one year !

      telecom == fraud. There is no honest phone company in the US.

  30. Has anyone worked with this approach? by CadmannWeyland · · Score: 1

    I know exactly where you're coming from as I'm in almost the identical circumstances. Currently I just eat the cost of the metro-type calling solution and use landline for dial-up IP.

    However, some friends have looked at this solution. I've not had a chance to look at it much yet. This company provides internet service from cellular towers in your area. They claim (I believe), that if you can use a cell phone from home, then you can use their stuff for your internet access.

    Anyway, here's the URL: http://www.convergenow.net

    I'd be really curious if any other slashdotters have had success with these folks or similar ones.

    Cadmann

  31. Try Direcway Satelite, u can use there VOIP by BraveHeartCalif · · Score: 1

    +++++++++ there internet speeds are reasonable

    1. Re:Try Direcway Satelite, u can use there VOIP by shepd · · Score: 1

      1 to 2 second pauses aren't acceptable in normal voice communications, sorry.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  32. I'm in the same boat... by RandyF · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From what I have found you have these options:

    1. Satalite (good speed but the lag time causes problems with session-based protocols such as VPNs)
    2. Line of site microwave (I'm not going to pay for building a tower on my place!)
    3. Paying for a fiber/cable/T1 line (way too expensive)
    4. Forming a "bandwidth coop" where the locals string together cable modem lines and equipment and share a single connection somewhere (there was an article on /. sometime back about this)
    5. Two cans and a string (Bandwidth is just way too slow...)

    Another option is an idea for a grass-roots company to bring high-speed to the last mile...

    good luck.

    --
    --==-- I've found Karma to be a relative thing... Ya know, the kind you invite to Christmas... ;)
  33. Just say no to dial up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > the top speed for dialup is 28.8

    That's just wrong. Wrong in so many ways.

  34. Knology is good by zoid.com · · Score: 1

    I have Knology Phone/Cable/Cable Modem Internet service and it is pretty good. The pipe the phone calls in over TV Cable. Not really sure how it works. They put this box outside the house and run wires out of it into the main phone line box. No special phones or anything like that. I get all 3 for a price of around $100/month.

    1. Re:Knology is good by amblin · · Score: 1

      Another nod to Knology. I have the same phone/cable/internet deal. Love the service.

  35. Consider a satellite dish and Vonage by John+Murdoch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi!

    What may be a very good option for you to consider is improving your Internet connectivity and then exploring VOIP (Voice Over IP). DirecTV has a satellite data arm called DirecWay that offers two-way broadband via satellite dish. (We have considered it, but only as a fallback to our existing circuit.)

    Once you have the broadband, look at VOIP...
    Once you have broadband, you might want to look at VOIP, especially Vonage. They will assign you a number and provide "local" calling service to every exchange in your "home" area code(s). VOIP quality is improving, and there are more and more people in the newsgroups providing helpful advice.

    Is this the BEST solution?
    Your mileage may vary. This is certainly a cutting edge solution--and, as the old adage goes, it may be hard to stay on the cutting edge without bleeding. If you're looking for better bandwidth anyway, it's worth taking a look at.

    1. Re:Consider a satellite dish and Vonage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vonage costs more than a phone line. How you can call it a competitor is beyound me. Hey, I have $1 bills for sale for only $2 ! How many do you want ?

    2. Re:Consider a satellite dish and Vonage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vonage will not work well with 2-way satellite because...

      1. Bandwidth contention scheme - the need to request and allocate bandwidth using the Slotted Aloha mechanism used by these systems creates unreasonable latency and jitter.

      2. Frame size - most DVB/RCS systems use a 250ms frame which allows VoIP appliances to sample voice only 4 times per second - therefore quality is poor.

      3. QoS - does not exist on most systems. No way to allocate bandwidth or adjust queue depth to optimize VoIP calls.

    3. Re:Consider a satellite dish and Vonage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Packet8 is supposed to use a lower speed codec (G.723.1 it may even work fine in dialup ?)
      Many users at httt://www.dslreports.com/forum/voip should be able to give you a "preview" of this and others (like Vonage)

    4. Re:Consider a satellite dish and Vonage by MattXonn · · Score: 1

      The Vonage web site says its service does not work with a satellite connection to the internet.

      Vonage Requirements

    5. Re:Consider a satellite dish and Vonage by Squidgee · · Score: 1
      I second this motion.

      In fact, if you have yerself a Mac try out Mac2Phone. It's unbelievably reliable, works well EVEN WITH dialup, and is damn cheap.

      In fact, I'd venture to say it's the best VOIP solution out there right now. Calls Landlines, you'll get a free IP Phone...it's all a great deal, and a great service.

      Best of luck, and look into all of these solutions (Also see the bit about Verizon's wireless card and a cell carrier. That would be the second option I suggest. Scroll down for it. =p)

    6. Re:Consider a satellite dish and Vonage by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Informative
      4. Latency. The lag turnaround time on satellite packets is abysmal and your phone conversation may sound like those reporters in Afghanistan.

      That said, get a satellite system for your normal surfing (at ~400kbps you'll beat your landline, lag time or no), then get a good cellphone plan and tell your landline provider to go whistle.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    7. Re:Consider a satellite dish and Vonage by wheezl · · Score: 1

      Actually this is thier standard response. However I emailed them and asked about it and they say the quality varies depending on what satelite technology and/or provider you use. They will give you a 14 day trial to see if it works with your system.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
  36. Re:Cell Phone by sassyanniee · · Score: 1

    As much as a girl?

  37. I live in the *same* area outside St. Louis as you by ||Deech|| · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've recent switched to Excel for all my calls.

    I pay about $50 a month or so (I think closer to $60 after taxes) for unlimited long distance and local calls, plus caller id, call waiting, forwarding and several other options that I don't even use.

    Service has been good. Billing has been accurate and on time. I don't have any complaints at all. Particularly since I'm no longer being forceably FDA'd by SBC anymore.

    I can't find the url for the offer I have. However, if you drop an email to deech "at" free "dash" source "dot" com, I'll be happy to send you the phone number from my flier.

    (quotes are punctuation discriptions, not text)

    --
    Run. I like water. Push My rutabaga.
  38. Instructions.... by WwWonka · · Score: 1, Funny

    1) Grab about 500 some odd miles of that super industrial NASA engineered cable from below /. article.
    2) Send one of the cable ends via Fed Ex to me in Milwaukee.
    3) Pull tight on the cable till it feels snug (may have some extra milage on the exact cable amount).
    4) Now connect your end to the bottom of a steel trash can where you are (someplace outside of St. Louis).
    5)I'll do the same up here.
    6)Place your noggin in the trash can and start talking.
    7)Success! Now do the same with all your other friends.

    1. Re:Instructions.... by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      8)Profit!!!!

  39. Some cell phone plans by CptChipJew · · Score: 1

    Such as one of AT&T's older one's allows unlimited EVERYTHING for $100/month. As long as you don't use the net on your phone.

    It sounds like a lot, but if you split the phone amongst two people, and have lots of friends across the country, it's a good deal.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
  40. Get a cell phone... by burnsy · · Score: 2, Informative

    And get a card like this for your laptop/desktop.

    Sierra Wireless Aircard 555

    1. Re:Get a cell phone... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I have and use Verizon Mobile Office. Basically, I couple my cell phone with a cable to my laptop to get (whoopee!) 19.2 Kbps Internet Service.

      It's slow (esp. compared to my 1.5 Mb DSL) but it's real nice when I'm on the road and have an issue to take care of.

      I don't think this card would be a replacement for broadband...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  41. If you like Cox... by donutz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You should check out whether your cable company offers digital phone service. Cox Communications does in many locations, and they claim to have similiar uptime to regular phone service, but much cheaper prices.

    I would have gone with them when I moved to California, but at the time they didn't have the service available in my neighborhood. I'm still hoping to check them out sometime.

    1. Re:If you like Cox... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
      since I live in the sticks and there is no cable, no DSL, and the top speed for dialup is 28.8



      He can't get cable...

    2. Re:If you like Cox... by donutz · · Score: 1

      point taken...but maybe there's someone out there who does have cable who could use this advice

  42. Tenino Telephone [Tenino, WA] by chuckwroks · · Score: 1, Interesting

    These people knocked my socks off. I called them up on a Friday asking for DSL for my company's office, there. Surprisingly, we were within range and everything looked like it was going to come off great. Then she dropped the bomb on me:

    "Now, you understand that this may not be ready until Tuesday, right?"

    Tuesday?! That's only 2 business days for DSL! Believe it! It doesn't have to be 2 months!

    1. Re:Tenino Telephone [Tenino, WA] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad you live out in the ass end of the world in the backwoods.

    2. Re:Tenino Telephone [Tenino, WA] by chuckwroks · · Score: 0

      ? I never had to leave my metropolitan desk. My office comes equiped with TELEPHONES, so making the call to get that office hooked up required only 11 keystrokes on my phone, from any location attached to the PSTN. Google it, you'll be surprised what you can learn.
      Thanks for playing, anyway.

  43. Having no problems by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using one for about six months. $50/month with unlimited long distance (and about $5 for the line charge to the CLEC). NOTE: I also shill for the service. Click link for details. Yes, it will hit you with some MLM info. But just click on the 'local phone service' button.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  44. what about the pizza? by obsid1an · · Score: 4, Informative

    A friend of mine got rid of his land line, but there was a fairly serious (for him) consequence he didn't plan on. The local pizza places don't deliver to cell phones.

    1. Re:what about the pizza? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get the first one take-out, and tip 'em so they'll remember. They'll deliver after that.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    2. Re:what about the pizza? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So make your own pizza. It's not hard. Buy some frozen crust ($.79 or so) and leave it on the counter before going to work. COme home, roll it out. Can of Furmano's tomato sauce is $.79. Brick of good whole milk mozzerella is $4, i use about half. Then, do it up how you like. I add some grated romano to a half cup of ricotta, black pepper, minced garlic and finely chopped pineapple and put a layer down before the mozz.

      10 minutes at 500F and you can kiss PizzaHut goodbye.

      Don't let the stodgy food industry keep you or your family from decreasing your communications costs! I spend around $220 per month in those (cell phones for me, my wife & my mom $97, telephone $35, i-net & cable $90) and would love to reduce. But i'm so lazy!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:what about the pizza? by alannon · · Score: 1

      This will change with time, and has in most places. I haven't owned a land-line in years and have never had a problem ordering pizza. In fact, I know quite a few people now who don't have land lines. I think this is getting more common and the pizza places will have to adapt.

    4. Re:what about the pizza? by dhaines · · Score: 1

      Exactly -- just try a little social engineering. All it took was an in-person explanation to the owner of our favorite pizzaria. They've even delivered to a nearby park.

    5. Re:what about the pizza? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it might be that they just don't deliver to telephones with caller-ID blocked.

    6. Re:what about the pizza? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >The local pizza places don't deliver to cell phones.

      Try using a credit card and paying for it first.

      If it's already paid for, most places would deliver to a garbage can if you wanted them to. As long as you are in their normal delivery area, what do they care?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:what about the pizza? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No homemade crust?

      1 1/2 cups warm water
      1 package dry yeast
      olive oil (I don't measure this, just pour some in)
      salt (a pinch or two)
      1/2 tsp sugar (makes the rise happen faster)
      1 cup whole wheat flour
      3 cups white flour

      Combine everything but the flour and mix well. Then mix flour a cup or so at a time. Kneed. Will rise in about 30-45 minutes, or leave in the frige covered overnight.

      Your kids will love the mixing and kneeding and the general sticky mess.

      I get the best results when I just crank my oven to the max temperature put the racks at the lower-most and upper-most positions. Cook the pie until the crust is brown on the bottom rack then transfer it to the top rack to get the cheese bubbling. Yummy.

  45. I like AT&T Residential Service by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 2, Informative

    $50 a month for unlimited local and long distance; call waiting, caller ID including on call waiting, call forwarding, and some other feature. I like using my landline because even if I use my cordless, my head doesn't hurt after using the phone, unlike with my mobile phone. And just the satisfaction in knowing that my money is in no way going to SBC's profits brings a smile to my face. I look forward to telephone service via Comcast Cable next year. The Baby Bells are as good as dead...and not in a Whedon-esque version of *dead* either...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  46. but the real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    why do you live in a place where you can't get high-speed access?

  47. T-Mobile by RedWingsSuck · · Score: 3, Informative

    I recently bought a Sony Ericcson ti-68 from amazon. It was free after rebates, and it is bluetooth enabled. T-Mobile has an internet service plan that is about $20 for unlimited access, I think. Pair the phone with a blue tooth enabled computer and you get about a 56K connection. I tried it while on vacation, and it worked great with my 12" PowerBook. I don't know if this is feasible with Linux or Windows, but you might look into it.

  48. mmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about a fine southern bell. :)

  49. Re:Sprint PCS - Get the cable at Radio Shack by kuwan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have the Sanyo 4900 and I got the cable at Radio Shack for $20. It didn't come with the software, but they don't have any software for Mac OS X so I didn't care. Mac OS X does have built-in drivers for the phone so I was set.

    $10 a month for unlimited data is great. For a while it was our primary Internet connection, now we've got a cable modem. No additional charges (we were on a lot) and >56k speeds. This is our only phone and it's been great.

  50. DirecWay by s10god · · Score: 1

    Assumming you do not need an untra fast PING you can allways go for DirectWay.... I am not sure if it is suitable for Voice over IP.. But it is a lot better than a 28.8 dialup.

  51. It can be done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay with your cell phone for regular calls. If you have a cband system or can get your hands on a cheap one go with cband.net for internet. However, you do need a land line for handshaking and out going data. I've been using CBand since the begining of the year and am *very* pleased with it. 40+K/Bs vs 26.4 kb/s with the dial up.

  52. Comcast by briggsb · · Score: 1

    I use Comcast Digital Telephone Service through the cable for local and long distance. Haven't had any issues with the service and I've even changed the set up a few times without any problems. Anything is better than Michigan Bell/Ameritech/SBC

  53. Not Verizon by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Verizon customer service just plain sucks. When they were GTE it was fine, but now it's just Evil. Don't go there.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  54. Everest by Iscariot_ · · Score: 1

    I live in the Kansas City area, and we are pretty much all SWB here. However, there is one alternative called Everest. Let me tell you, these guys rock. They are extremely cheap, and the offer phone, internet, and cable. I pay less than $100 a month, have all the channels I want, a phone line, and cable internet. It doesn't get any better!!

  55. Get a Cell Phone by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    A while back, when we moved into the apartment before the one we're in now, we decided to give MCI a chance. The price was good, the calling was good--but it was 9 weeks before the phone was installed. When we moved apartments into the one we're in now, it was going to be another 4-12 weeks to get the phone service transfered. (We called Verizon, and got it done the same day.)

    Unless you have to share your phone line with another person, or need it to connect to an ISP, my suggestoin is to skip the land line and get a cell phone. My friends who have cells are _easier_ to get ahold of than those with land lines, and activation / transfer takes hours or days, not weeks or months.

    1. Re:Get a Cell Phone by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      The problem with getting new numbers, or moving numbers, when you're a CLEC like MCI is that no matter what you do, you have to work through the repair department of the local Bell company, who may or may not be inclined to cooperate. Sort of like how wearing thick gloves reduces your dexterity considerably. Which is why the standard timeframe for such things is "up to 60 days." Most customers aren't too pleased about that.

      If I wanted to get MCI service installed, I'd have the local company install it and then call MCI to switch it over. If I wanted to move my MCI number to a new location, I'd migrate the local service back to the Bell company, have them move me, then migrate back to MCI. I can understand that's an awful lot of rigamarole for someone to want to go through, though.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  56. The ups and downs of Vonage by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is going to be month two on Vonage for me (voip phone service through a cable modem) and its a good service but...

    1. They have significant voicemail problems. I think the consensus at dslreport's voip forums is that they are overselling/pushing their VM system too hard or they just expanded too quickly. Its not just lost VM but sometimes my phone wont ring when VM is enabled. Workaround: use a plain-jane answering machine. Afterall, you get a normal POTS phone jack from the Cisco ATA they send you.

    2. Be mindful of you upload speed and what apps you're running on your home lan. You don't want to use this when kazaa or whatever is maxing out your upload cap. Throttle bandwidth to leave yourself 100kbs. Vonage also has a 30kbs compressed codec for people without much bandwidth.

    3. Of course, if you lose network connectivity (or power for that matter) you lose phone. That probably isn't much of a concern in a world of cell phones, but its something to consider if you don't have a cell phone and are far from your neighbors.

    The pros

    1. It sounds excellent. Its POTS quality as far as I can tell. Think of it as MP3 compared to CD.

    2. If you're already paying for broadband its a smart investment. Telling the local monopoly to piss off is very gratifying. Not to mention you have built in number portability. Just plug that Cisco ATA anywhere and you have your old phone number.

    3. The geek quotient of using VoIP without the other party know or asking, "What are you calling me on, a damn tin can?"

    1. Re:The ups and downs of Vonage by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      1. They have significant voicemail problems. I think the consensus at dslreport's voip forums is that they are overselling/pushing their VM system too hard or they just expanded too quickly. Its not just lost VM but sometimes my phone wont ring when VM is enabled. Workaround: use a plain-jane answering machine. Afterall, you get a normal POTS phone jack from the Cisco ATA they send you.

      You might want to be sure about what you are suggesting before posting. Oh...nevermind. It's /. Just make it up.

      Answering machines DON'T WORK WITH VONAGE.

      Why? A Cisco ATA does NOT provide full signaling capability. You machine will pick up on however many rings it's set to, but it will have no idea when the caller hangs up, and will run until it times out/runs out of tape/runs out of memory.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    2. Re:The ups and downs of Vonage by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Not to mention you have built in number portability."

      Sort of, Vonage isn't exactly available everywhere. If I wanted to use it my neighbor would have to call long distance to reach me. It's also a bit expensive if you don't normally use much long distance.

    3. Re:The ups and downs of Vonage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Some answering machines hang up after a certain amount of silence... and if it's digital, it just deletes the silence and you're fine.

  57. Work with Linux? by msimm · · Score: 1

    Sorry about the redundant question. Is it Linux friendly? Sounds interesting enough.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Work with Linux? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      As far as I can see it's standalone, technically you wouldn't even need a pc to use it, just a regular phone and a broadband link.

    2. Re:Work with Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Linux with Vonage. It's great! Here is a minimal example IPTable setup you will need (with no firewall considerations) - sorry about the formatting:

      dhcpd eth1 -cf /etc/log.d/conf/services/dhcpd.conf

      iptables --table nat --append POSTROUTING --out-interface eth0 -j MASQUERADE
      iptables --append FORWARD --in-interface eth1 -j ACCEPT
      iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING --dst 192.168.1.10 -p udp --dport 5060 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.199:5060
      iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING --dst 192.168.1.10 -p udp --dport 5061 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.199:5061
      iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING --dst 192.168.1.10 -p udp --dport 10000 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.199:10000
      iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING --dst 192.168.1.10 -p udp --dport 10001 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.199:10001

    3. Re:Work with Linux? by wheezl · · Score: 1

      With FreeBSD and ipfilter i just needed a stadard nat for my internal net to the external inteface and a general stateful filter. I haven't had to figure out what the ports are.

      Also one you swtich to firewalling with a real computer instead of the cheap little box they send you.. all of the kazaa anfd gnutella problems completely go away.

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
  58. No phone by poptones · · Score: 1

    I won't comment on the phone, but being a dialup user myself I know how much it can suck. And if the best I could do was 28.8 you better believe I'd have a satellite dish on the roof. Jeez, why even bother at that speed?

  59. Tmobile Unlimited GPRS by mytador · · Score: 1

    Since youre on dialup anyways, why dont you checkout TMobile that offers unlimited GPRS data internet access for only $19.99 in addition to your cell service. If you get good reception with TMobile where you live, youd be able to get 36.6K to 56K speeds with GPRS. Just get a bluetooth usb dongle for your PC and Nokia 3650 phone(often free with 1 year contract) and use phone as a modem and Tmobile GPRS as ISP.....

    1. Re:Tmobile Unlimited GPRS by aphor · · Score: 1

      GPRS has several "channels" that can carry packet data in either direction. I have an unlocked T68i that I use on T-Mobile service, and it shows me that there are idle GPRS channels that could be used to boost the download speed. Right now I'm paying for megabytes (I never get half of them) because I have DSL at home, and I only really use the GPRS data service to check my email or get weather/directions on the road.

      If I could get rid of the xfer limit on my GPRS connection, and I could activate more of the GPRS downstream channels, I would use it more. Otherwise it is painful compared to my 382k DSL, despite using T-Mobile's very-cool lossy-compressing transparent http proxy to compress image file size on web pages viewed over GPRS.

      Does anyone have experience with GPRS service that does >56k??

      --
      --- Nothing clever here: move along now...
  60. Alternate Local Carrier Tiers by justfred · · Score: 1

    Here's a bit of trivia that most people don't know about alternate local phone carriers (LEC Local Exchange Carrier identified by OCN Operating Company Number).

    LECs are divided into three tiers: A, B, and C. Most ex-Bell carriers are tier A; most third-party carriers (for example, Cox) are tier C. Frontier, GTE, and Sprint (local) are tier B. I believe that cellphone carriers mostly qualify as tier C, but I'm not sure.

    Long distance calls, especially in-state but also interstate long distance, cost the LD carrier a lot more if they originate and/or terminate at tier B or C. A-A calls, for example, might cost the carrier 2c/minute; C-C calls can cost 10c!

    Some LD carriers pass these costs directly to the user; others refuse to provide service to tier C users. Many LD companies are considering charging customers different rates depending on the originating and terminating LEC.

    Don't be surprised if at some point in the future it costs you more to call a cellphone or a (Joe's local telco) customer long distance.

  61. Don't use the ones on TV by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Any of the "local" providers that advertise on TV that will "get you connected for $XX.95" are no good if you ever want to get a car loan or mortgage.

    A friend recently got a car loan and they asked for her home phone number and she said she just had a cell, and they said that for any loan company to approve a loan, you need to have a home phone provided by a major telephone company. (They specifically mentioned SBC, Verizon or Sprint) I suppose this is because people would get a phone line with the no name companies, get their loan and cancel and then default on the loan and get a new number. If you use a major phone company I think they can hunt you down easier or something.

    1. Re:Don't use the ones on TV by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      I suppose it could be considered a sort of short cut to avoid having to do a credit check, as major phone companies tend to do credit checks before they provide local service. Or proof that you were established where you said you were. Or something.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  62. Cut the cord by digisky · · Score: 1

    St. Louis is home to several Wireless (wi-fi) Internet Service Providers (WISP) that offer SDSL type speeds or better for amoun the same or less money per month. Some have committed rates of 128k with unlimited burst of 384 and up.

  63. I work for one... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

    I work for one of these competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs for short). We offer service under a couple different names depending on if you want pre-paid or post-paid service (and how good your credit is). It's tough to compete but we try to offer good rates and packages to our customers. Depending on the area, some of the plans are pretty good. Other areas it's just impossible to compete much so our plans are not very competitive or we just don't offer service there. As far as the quality of service, it's still the big companies (mostly baby bells) that control the facilities so there is little we can do to improve over any existing conditions in a particular area.

  64. Actually I do some work for a southern Ill CLEC... by johnmearns · · Score: 1

    I work do some work for a southern Illinois based CLEC http://www.gettelco.com that is offering services in the metro east. Currently we don't offer residential service, although we're working toward that goal so hopefully soon. Anyway where in the area are you? If you're on the Illinois side of the river there aren't many options yet. I do believe Mcleod does offer some services in the area, but there just aren't many alternatives yet. Both SBC and Verizon if you go a little farther south in Illinois really ream you for intralata calls.

    --
    "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it." -Voltaire
  65. Have you looked into WISPs by RevMike · · Score: 1
    Check out this site, some of the providers listed seem to branch fairly far out.

    Poke arround the main site. there is some info there about starting your own WISP and selling service to your neighbors.

    I've heard mixed reports about using Vonage and satelite ISP. YMMV.

    Good Luck.

  66. Wireless Broadband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You might look into the wireless broadband options:

    There were a couple of other attempts around St. Charles, but I think they evaporated.
  67. These rates are too high? by AuraSeer · · Score: 1

    I live in St. Louis too. I don't know where you moved from, but the phone rates here are actually very good for a city of this size. Keep in mind that if you're only 25 minutes away, you're still well within the metropolitan area. It takes me 20 minutes to get to the city proper, and I'm smack in the middle of suburbia.

    I do agree that the phone companies aren't much help with defining "local". They seem to define it by location instead of exchange, so I never know what's local until I see the bill.

  68. Advertises at $29.99/mo (intriguing) by StRex · · Score: 1
    I'm a T-Mobile customer in St. Louis (I live in the city), and except for a few dead cells here and there is pretty thoroughly covered.

    This plan seems interesting. It says $29.99/mo for unlimited access, but curiously lists $0.20/minute for calls. T-Mobile uses GSM, which means this data connection is probably provided via GPRS, so it's not technically using a call to do so. (Sidenote: I know from experience that unless you specifically have GPRS added to your plan, T-Mobile will handle Internet access as a phone call, charging you minutes. Thus, while Internet access on a GSM line seems like it would always be GPRS, this isn't the case.) At any rate, it's not totally clear what all this plan offers. It would be nice to know if they would add this on to a standard phone plan of theirs so you don't have to pay for minutes.

    Don't assume they'll do this unless you ask. They can be pretty goofy about the plans they'll let you set up. Good luck!

    1. Re:Advertises at $29.99/mo (intriguing) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article I read (sorry I don't remember where), said that the pricing wasn't available online yet, you had to call them and ask, it's adding unlimited t-zone usage to your phone, so you shouldn't be placing a call, just data transfer.

  69. Dish Internet? by Josuah · · Score: 1

    Since the only reason you're keeping your landline is for Internet access, what about satellite dish services? That doesn't require you to have any wire infrastructure; you just buy the dish from like Radio Shack and concrete it on the ground or stick it on the roof. Then you can get your nicer mobile phone service and high-speed Internet access.

    I don't know of any Internet dish services off the top of my head though.

    1. Re:Dish Internet? by kd4zph · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, I think you have to have a landline for those satellite internet services...... the landline sends packet requests and data out and the satellite just receives the incoming datastream.

    2. Re:Dish Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The direcway system from Hughes is two-way sat system. However, the initial setup requires the PC to make a phone call requiring a modem/phone line.

      The equipment can be expensive with setup (~$600) and monthly service ~$70, but it does provide high speed internet almost anywhere in the US. Earthlink and AgriStar also uresell the direcway system with different options.

    3. Re:Dish Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DirecTV is now offering the Starband system, so you might want to check that out. They may require a landline for the box to call home on once in a while, but the calls are to an in-WATS line, and won't incur any toll charges.

      This is a two-way satellite service, but last time I looked, they didn't support/tolerate Linux. However, it's possible that competetive pressure may have caused them to relax that position somewhat.

      BTW, don't forget to ask a lot of tough questions of your PUC, whether you're in Missouri or Illinois. You - and your fellow taxpayers - fund them to do the right thing. They should have some answers for you (like, just who ARE the CLECs serving your area). If they don't, make them - they work for YOU.

      Also, if you don't have access to cable TV, find out WHY NOT! I live in a small New England town about 20 miles from the state capital. For years, only certain parts of town had cable TV. As it happens, I live on a rather high hill, so it was kind of a moot point for me, but my neighbors down in the hollows had to do without TV reception. Well, the incumbent cable TV system was bought out by a larger company and it came time for them to renew their franchise. By this time, my town's Board of Selectmen had heard enough complaints and had studied the matter in greater detail (and there were a lot of residents employed in various high-tech companies in the region) that they told the Cable TV company that, as conditions for renewal, a.) provide access to EVERY residence in the town and b.) provide full access to ALL services (i.e., broadband) as they were providing to other towns in the area on their systems. Within a year, there were two parallel aluminum coax lines run to the pole right outside my house and there is a rather large box clamped to a utility pole on the town road, about 3/4 of a mile away, which I suspect is the local router for the broadband stuff.

      So, it CAN be done. If the local telephone company tries to justify its exorbitant rates, explain to them that the PUC will be hearing The Rest Of The Story from you and your neighbors, and remind them gently that you all are paying taxes to fund rural telephone service. Don't be afraid to raise hell at both the state and the local/county level to get the services you should be getting. The cable companies have to pay a franchise fee to your local government - make both parties more responsive, and keep the pressure up, and keep the PUC informed !!

  70. lucky guys by oordaz · · Score: 0

    At least you don't live in Mexico. The only telephone company here sucks, the service sucks, the prices sucks. Examples (prices converted to us dlls): You can make up to 100 LOCAL calls for about 19 dlls (month), extra calls 18 cents each, long distance about 50 cents by minute, call to any "local" cell phone 29 cents. . . ahhhhh, their internet services: 256k ADSL 60dlls month with 3 year contract; special fees for decline contract.

    Bastards!

  71. MCI's Neighborhood by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although MCI is one of my clients, I pretty much have no problem being critical of their services when I need to. (I certainly don't have a problem switching between any carrier to find a better rate or service.)

    About a year ago, I changed over to their combined local telephone service + long distance service called "The Neighborhood". Meaning, there is no longer a bill from a local telephone company. And there is no longer a bill from a long distance carrier. The Neighborhood provides both.

    It is a flat-rate service for residential use for calling within the US. Meaning, make as many calls as you want, local or long distance, for as long as you want. At the end of the month, you get an itemized phone bill. It contains the flat-rate fee (approx $70 with all the charges added up for me) and lists each and every long distance call placed, and at $0.00.

    For me it is several pages. And what is interesting is that when I add up all of the minutes, the end result averages to be as if I paid $0.02 per minute for long distance, and got my local telephone service for free.

    Other features are thrown in. Voice mail. Three way. Speed dial. Caller ID. Call waiting. Call waiting Caller ID. Probably some other things I forget.

    I had one outage that affected me and the entire residential area around me. It was fixed right along with everyone else.

    Anyhow, I'm pleased. I was paying as much as SBC charged for local service + caller id + metro plan. Now I get that much, more, and unlimited long distance. My variable rate phone bills have disappeared.

    1. Re:MCI's Neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I come from a biased viewpoint -- MCI laid me off three months ago, but I must admit, the Neighborhood, is just a damn good deal!

    2. Re:MCI's Neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree, I am quiet pleased with the Neighborhood Plan

    3. Re:MCI's Neighborhood by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      See if you can hitch a ride to Springfield, MO, and apply there; they seem to be hiring customer service reps for Zorro/Small Business like there's no tomorrow. And former MCI-ness can surely only count positively, especially if the decision to leave wasn't yours.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:MCI's Neighborhood by hymie3 · · Score: 1

      I have a similar experience with MCI's The Neighborhood.

      Under Bellsouth, Caller ID+3way calling+Call waiting Plus voicemail+local service (plus taxes and tarrifs and service charges) on one line is $56. With TheNeighborhood, I get all of that *plus* free long distance for just under $70.

      Since over 90% of my minutes are long distance, this was a no-brainer for me. I've only had one phone problem, and they were able to reset my line from their switch and I was back up and running in less than two minutes (including hold time).

      The voice mail is really cool because I can access it from the internet (the messages are saved as .wav files). I have it set up to page me and email me when I get a new voice mail. Hella cool.

      Having said that, Bellsouth now has (at least in my area) a similar plan. All the bells and whistles, plus unlimited long distance, for about $2 cheaper a month. I'll not be changing providers. Their customer support has almost always been horrid.

  72. love talk america by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    I have not had any trouble with them and I get 3 cents per min long distance withthem along with no local toll and as many features as I like for free!!!

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  73. I use my cable provider by HBergeron · · Score: 1

    Starpower (RCN) they offer a full package of cable, phone, and cable modem. If you take the shop-around price of each of those components, they offer the phone service for 20% less then Verizon in this area (Washington, DC)

    They have provided exceptional service so far. I have had one phone outage which they fixed as quickly as verizon/bell atlantic ever had, and they were better able to diagnose their network (ie. didn't need to come into my home and make me wait there for several hours while they mucked around) to fix the problem.

    Cablewise, with this package they give you "megamodem" service, I have seen sustained downloads over 400Kbps - not all the time, but occasionally - still can't rec. them entirely as some ports are blocked and you need to work around them. On the other hand, they don't try to cut you off for making use of those workarounds - they seem interested only in inhibiting the casual user.

    now offering hdtv service with the phone package at no additional charge, we'll see how they do.

    --
    THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal...
    1. Re:I use my cable provider by anomaly · · Score: 1

      This message was posted over my RCN cable modem connection. I use them for local phone service, too, and have been very satisfied with their service.

      I'm thrilled that none of my money goes to verizon.....

      --
      But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
  74. Re:Cell Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't take it personally, nerdy girls are just like one of the guys, you're not like those girly girls that we couldn't talk to even if we wanted to. We know they talk too much cause every time we call they tell us they gotta go cause they have another call coming in.

  75. You know you're a nerd when... by StRex · · Score: 1
    ...you consult DSLReports when researching places to live. Been there, done that -- in St. Louis, no less.

    But hey, I completely understand that not everyone is as socially deprived as I am. I verified not only the distance to the CO, but how their feature set compared to the CO in the neighborhood from which I was moving. Not that I understand what a CO being an "OC12 capable wire center" truly means, but anything mentioning OC12 has to be cool, right? ;-)

    1. Re:You know you're a nerd when... by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      OC12 - Optical Carrier Signal Level 12 refers to SONET data transmission at 622.080Mbps (Fast)

  76. Re: Using MCI "The Neighborhood" Plan by 3mike · · Score: 1

    I live in the NE burbs of Chicago and I have also switched over to MCI and figured out that the right plan is the above-mentioned MCI "The Neighborhood" plan at about $50 plus maybe $15 taxes. Includes local, unlimited US long distance, voicemail. Previously I was paying SBC about the same amount before any long distance charges. So far the MCI service seems pretty much OK. (Quaintly, some of the customer service people weren't initially familiar with our having to dial area codes for (all) calls here.) Presumably, the recent SBC attempt to surrepticiously get the line lease rates jacked up is dead for now even though SBC are appealing the judicial knockdown, and MCI will continue to offer the plan. PS I use Comcast for internet, if the local phone lines were good enough and a decent price I would try to switch to DSL.

  77. Try Infiniplex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure how far out in the sticks you are, but my parents live in O'Fallon and have fixed wireless through Infiniplex (786Kbps/786Kbps for ~$100/month, if memory serves).

    Might take care of the dial-up problem...

  78. VoicePulse is cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the same thing from voicepulse, now i pay $27 for unlimited usage of my phone line.

    http://www.voicepulse.com/

  79. Bill THEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add up all the "number portability" fees from the months you paid them. Estimate if if you don't have the bills. Write up an official very professional looking invoice to RCN, and address it to Accounts Payable. List the item as "overcharge on number portability fee."

    Only after they don't pay it, complain to the State AG. There is actually a good chance you will get a check.

  80. EAS / "Local Calling Area" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I work with dozens of ILECs like the ones you describe, and part of my job involvs finding out what exchanges/cities their Extended Area Service, or Local Calling Area, covers.

    Telephone companies are typically required by their state Public Utilities Commission to publish tariffs that indicate, among other things, what areas you can call "locally", that is, without paying a toll to an intraLATA or interLATA carrier. Additionally, the telephone company is typically required to give this information out to the public during business hours.

    You should call the companies you are considering and ask what their "EAS Calling Area" is for the area in which you live. If they claim ignorance, simply mention that you could call the state PUC and ask them for assistance, but that the phone company would much rather help you directly. They can receive stiff penalties for not handling such public information inquiries directly!

    I hope this helps.

  81. Actual experience by Ymerej · · Score: 1

    I live in Falls Church, VA. I have used two non-Bell phone companies, both of them because of bundled internet service. The first was Cavalier. Internet service was DSL. Very nice. Static IP, very reasonable TOS. Advertised data rate: 256 synchronous. Actual data rate: closer to 512. Phone service: horrible. They were a small company who clearly didn't have procedures down, and my wife finally made me dump them. We then went to StarPower. Internet service is cable. 512 = Data rate 1.5M. TOS bad, DHCP, incoming port 80 blocked. Phone service: OK so far.

  82. Shut up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tard

    1. Re:Shut up by s10god · · Score: 1

      Duh , huh, yup yup yup........

  83. St. Louis phone service is awful. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    I use SWBell for local calls only and my sprint cell phone for everything else.

    The prices our outrageous and there are no competitors in my area.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  84. Get a pre-paid cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That is all I have and the rate is only $.03/min if you purchase in 500-minute blocks.

    No monthly fee, no credit card, no taxes. Just $.03 /min.

  85. tmobile by brjndr · · Score: 1

    You can by a blue-tooth phone from t-mobile, and a blue-tooth adaptor for your computer, and surf on that. They offer unlimited data plans now for $20/month. It works well, I recommend sony ericson phones, I have the P800. I'm not 100% sure on the speed, I only use it when I have laptop and am away from home/wi-fi access point.

  86. Consider yourself lucky by nzyank · · Score: 0

    In New Zealand there's one choice, NZ Telecom. I there's one other long distance service that my wife set up a while back, but they were no cheaper. Guess my kharma can't get much worse here, so I may as well just say it. Americans are spoiled and whine about stupid things. Just get over it, mate and consider yourself lucky you even have a choice.

  87. Member-Owned Cooperative by core+plexus · · Score: 1
    Every time this comes up, that's my response. In my member owned coop, and by the way I live 25 miles from town, in Alaska, and I have excellent phone, DSL, even voicemail. And once a year I get the excess back in a check, after the services are improved. I believe we have between 2,000 and 5,000 members.

    Why be a sucker and pay for some limp-weiners alimony and mid-life crises? Member-Owned Cooperative, Yeah baby!

    Weird News

  88. I'll second that by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    My DSL experience has thus far trounced my cable experience soundly.

    My current Cox cable barely gives me 3-400kpbs download speeds (based on driver and iso downloads), whereas my ex-DSL provider (Ameritech) gave me a solid 700-800kbps down. Online gaming pings are roughly equivalent. I can't explain the difference, because the costs are very comparable.

    My DSL provider also didn't have a problem with me running servers, and the service was greater than 99% available... outages counted on one hand, and never more than a few hours in length.

    Now don't get me wrong... dealing with Ameritech can be like a root canal sans anethesia (3 tries to get the installation right), but once it was set up, it ran like a champ.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  89. Cellular by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    I use my cellphone for any and all calls I make. It's $10 more per month, and since I get unlimited evenings/weekends, I just get long-distance people to call me instead, and all is well. Plus, I can take it with me, I can turn it off whenever I want, and I get voicemail too. Funny thing is, a local land line with voicemail would cost about the same. Go figure.

    --Dan

  90. 1 Quick search... by 222 · · Score: 1

    revealed these guys (http://www.networkstl.com/whatisit.htm). They claim nationwide availablity, althought the monthly fee of $99 is somewhat high. It all depends on how much your internet is worth, i suppose.

    Shouts out to a fellow Stl'er by the way :)

  91. PURE LIES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe people will post this kind of pure bullshit.

  92. costco for toll and long distance by Urox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got hit hard when I found out that CA had not only inter-LATA charges, but INTRA-LATA charges.. basically toll charges within a given area. Then I found out that Costco offered toll phone service.

    Costco will give you any needed local or long distance charges through their provider. The company is MCI, but you are getting it as if you were going to provide it to other people rather than end user MCI service. You're getting what the phone companies buy.

    5 cents a minute, no monthly fees, and you are billed on 6ths of a second. My SO and I got tired of times when the bill was lower than the cost of a stamp so we sent them a moderate size check and haven't heard from them since.

    --
    "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
    1. Re:costco for toll and long distance by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Uh...except for in states where you don't have more than one LATA, typically there are intra-LATA charges no matter what phone company you're with. It's called Local Toll calling.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    2. Re:costco for toll and long distance by Urox · · Score: 1

      costco coveres Local Toll Calls. They also cover intra-lata calls, intra state rates, and other long distance. see here

      --
      "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
  93. I had good luck with XO... by freeBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...although their services may not be what you need.

    I was running a small business which did about 10,000 minutes a month on its 800 number and had relatively modest data requirements. They split a T-1 (half voice lines, half data) and gave me a good price for three services (local phone, data and long-distance). The quality was far superior to what we had been getting from our Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) provider (Qwest).

    If they offer what you need in your area, I would definitely recommend checking them out.

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  94. Experiences with Alternate Local Phone Companies by AMH209 · · Score: 1

    I live just across the river from St. Louis. Fortunantly we have Charter cable, so we are able to get broadband. I'm assuming that you live in the ShowMe State and not the Land of Lincoln. For whatever reason, it seems that they are much slower rolling out broadband on that side of the river. In recent months there has been a couple of companies start up that are offering wireless broadband. As far as phone companies, we have Ameritech. I use my cell phone (Cingular) for all my long distance calls since I have free LD. Plus, most of MO and Southern IL are covered as local calls with Cingular.

  95. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  96. I live 30 minutes outside STL. by rindeee · · Score: 1

    Full T1 from Birch is only $390/mo. (free router, free install, block of statics). Split a channel or two off for voice, sell some bandwidth to your neighbors. Voi la...in the end (assuming you have a few interested neighbors) costs no more than local phone service (or less....pays for itself). Just be sure to throttle your neighbors data access. Of course if by "20 minutes outside of St. Louis" you mean in Illinois, well, your screwed. IL (where I used to live) is telco and broadboand no-mans land with high rates and terrible service.

  97. Alternate ISPs? by istewart · · Score: 1

    This kinda fits in with the topic at hand, but I'd like to hear some experiences with alternate ISPs. Currently, DSL is not available where I am and I have a dialup account with the West Coast node of the S-Borg-Collective, formerly known as Pacific Bell. However, SBC just completed a huge revamp on their local CO, so I may now have some hope for DSL. However, I want to give SBC the finger since their DSL plans seem a ripoff, and go with somebody like Speakeasy, who has much more lax restrictions on my bandwidth usage. But I'd like to hear if anybody has had any trouble with getting installation, service, etc. from a provider who isn't the phone company running the CO. Also, has anyone had any problems dealing with the phone company itself afterwards, assuming you kept them for voice service? Thanks.

  98. Re:Sprint PCS - Get the cable at Radio Shack by doomy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had the same cable from Radio Shack, but this cable does not recharge while you are online, so after 3-4 hours you have to recharge your phone.

    I searched on the net and found this cable that does recharge while you are on the net too, it's 15 bucks. I got the cable and returned by Radio Shack cable.

    And the good part is that the cable came with a small size cd that had the required software for windows (and also PIM updating tools for the phone), but I never tried this out, cause I use my phone only in Linux.

    And for the troll who posted that this is getting charged (I see you guys on sprintusers all the time), no.. there is no charge. It's unlimited =)

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
  99. Volcanic responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I find odd is that this sort of question can evoke a volcanic response. This ought to say something about the free market system, but that's a very complicated topic.

    Sad, sad sad.

  100. Vonage can't give you an 800 number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    or other toll-free number. I would have switched if they could.

    I'm in a Verizon state (Delaware) but my local line is through Cavalier Telephone for a few years now (http://cavaliertelephone.com). It's a little cheaper than Verizon, and no problems so far. LD is PNG (a Qwest reseller), I get an 888 number free at the same per-minute rate.

  101. onesuite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.onesuite.com no monthly fee, rates as low as 2.5c/minute.

  102. Mcleodusa Interent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dont get mcleod if you want to run your own server. they shut me down for having 3 open ports for telnet, smtp, and webhosting

  103. http://www.telebright.com to get the cheapest by Brian+Cunnie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used Telebright to figure out what was the cheapest provider for me (it turns out the cheapest provider was Power Net Global). Telebright is on the up-and-up and Consumer Reports actually forwarded me to that site (Consumer Reports strives to be as vendor-indifferent as possible). You type in your calling patterns (e.g. 600 minutes/month evening 200 minutes/month daytime) and they'll tell you what the cheapest plan is (from MCI, AT&T, Sprint, and other providers). Telebright makes their money by actually hooking you up with the LD provider (the LD provider pays the fee). Of course you can bypass them if you want to and sign up directly, but it doesn't save you any money. --Brian

  104. Not the same boat, but this works very well for me by spacefrog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Although I am not quite in the same boat as the poster, the following combo works out pretty well for me.

    Just for reference, I live in northern San Diego county, California. I can not get DSL (too far from C.O.) nor can I get fixed-point wireless (we tried, but there are trees in the way and my H.O.A. sort of owns the trees). I run a business from my home. The services I use serve me for both personal and business use.

    I have cablemodem service with Cox. It rocks. The downstream is awesome. At night it has sometimes even beat the supposed 3mb maximum that the cable company claims.

    I can get an analog phone line from PacBell or a hybrid phone line from the cable company, where they put a box similar to a cablemodem at my junction (demarcation) point. I don't have either.

    I have $39 service with Vonage, as many other posters do. At least with my net service, it is awesome. Sounds about as good as a land-line and has every feature you could ever want included in the base price... Unlimited LD, caller id, callwaiting, callwaiting id, voicemail, incredible forwarding options, etc.

    I have a cell phone from Sprint. Sprint isn't the best company around, but the damn thing works and is priced right. I have more minutes than I could ever dream of using and for like $14 a month I put my mom's handset on my account. Soak up those extra minutes! When I get around to buying a new phone I will be able to use their 64-144k service.

    Lastly I have a J2 fax mailbox. It gives me send and receive fax capabilities without paper cuts, a fax machine, or even an analog modem. It just works. About $10 a month.

    I keep the vonage number on no-answer forward to my cell and everything eventually dumps into my voicemail.

    This entire combo runs me about $150 a month for basically the ultimage telephone/pager/cell/internet/fax/voicemail/cablev combo I could come up with. $150, flat, no long distance charges, etc. I know a lot of people who pay $150 alone for their landline or cell phone bills alone. Other than rent, food, and auto-related stuff, that is the extent of my fixed monthly expenses.

  105. MCI "The Neighborhood" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Neighborhood is available in Seattle area for about $40/mo + taxes. All local and long distance calls (in the United States) are included in the price... all you can eat.

  106. Only on Slashdot, brother... by SunPin · · Score: 2, Funny
    dumping your local bell might be one of the best feelings you ever have.

    Only on Slashdot.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Only on Slashdot, brother... by wheezl · · Score: 1

      :) it's all about the hate really :)

      I will stress the "one of" portion of my comment

      --
      -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
  107. CoreComm by mrkurt · · Score: 2, Informative

    As you can probably tell from my URL, my ISP is CoreComm. They are also my telco (I'm too far away from the CO for "real" DSL), as I still have dialup. They have been my telco/ISP for three years now, and my monthly charges are still about $15 a month less than what I was paying for Sum Bitchin' Communications (aka SBC) and Prodigy at the time.

    The service from CoreComm has been pretty good (one day of outage over the past three years); a while back they added a spam filtering service that does a good job of catching spam and redirecting it out of my inbox. If you are looking for a new telco and they serve your area, you might check them out.

    My biggest problem has been with MCI Worldcom, which was my former long distance carrier. Those assholes kept trying to bill me for service I did not have with them; as late as last summer they were trying to bill me for monthly service, even though CoreComm is my long distance company. After screaming at a couple of customer service reps, they finally closed my account. If financial shenanigans don't sink MCI Worldcom, bad service will.

    --
    Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
    1. Re:CoreComm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WorldCom send me a bill for more than 400 dollars in phone calls, some of which I never made and all of which I did make were made through a non-WorldCom 1010 number.

    2. Re:CoreComm by ZuG · · Score: 1

      I work for them (I speak only for myself, and not my employer), and they are definately cheaper than the SBC deal, especially if you want bundled internet/phone service. $68.00 a month will get you unlimited local, unlimited dialup, and unlimited long distance service. If you make a lot of phone calls and live in the midwest, it's a good way to go.

  108. Optimum Online...mucho bandwidth...less money by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    I live in Hamilton, NJ (Mercer County).

    I've got digital cable (with high-def programming), movies on-demand, high-speed internet. I get 10 Mbps down 1Mbps up consistently. (Cablevision's Lightpath service is their SONET backbone.) What DSL even gets close to those speeds? OK, the speeds aren't guarenteed...but then I never paid for an SLA. I use a Cisco NAT firewall and Cisco wireless access point with cablevision's blessing. I spend about $90.00/mo. total.

    They just started offering phone service...I might try it and drop the $80.00/mo. I give to Verizon.

    -ted

    1. Re:Optimum Online...mucho bandwidth...less money by nezrael · · Score: 1

      hah! lucky! us who've no desire to deal with the asses that come with cities are pretty much stick with dialup. Within the last few years, more long distance fiber optics have been laid than, well, in a damn long time. Even here on the oregon coast (u wanna talk about the sticks, try towns of 500 and 1000, lol) they just laid a giant fiber line all through the state (connecting thru washington/cali, obviously). But guess what, IT'S DARK! Apparently either no company has the balls to take it on and flip the switch, or there's just so much political malarky and red tape at the moment no one CAN. Either way I'm rather upset by this, seeing as I'm an avid gamer. I've no problem paying the $60 a month for a dedicated 640k line (yeah i know it's a ripoff, but it beats 28.8k), but oh well. mike

  109. How about wireless by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    If your anywhere near Troy then try alwayson-line.net. They have a great wireless high speed plan that won't break the bank.

  110. VONAGE.COM $26 a MONTH 500 LD included by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using this service for months, works great. More features than the local companies offer is another great benefit.

    www.vonage.com

  111. In MD, Cavalier... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

    I've been using a CLEC, Cavalier Telecom, for my home phone for over a year now. Quite happy with it, just signed up for their DSL service and so far so good. The service has been good, but the best thing it simply that they're not Verizon...

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  112. Pavlovian Responses?? by Feral+Bueller · · Score: 1
    All of the broadband discussion has been neato and everything, but I'm interested in what was apparently (to me at least) the basis of the original question, so I'll ask it again:

    What are peoples' experiences with local alternative POTS(land-line) carriers?

    I've had a nightmare overbilling experience with SBC, and as a result, I'm forced to use Verizon wireless for my "home" phone and HotSpot for my broadband.

    What I'd like to know, is there any place that is aggregating this information, in a similar fashion as dslreports.com dslreports.com but for POTS? National would be of obvious use, but I'd settle for any information in the L.A. area.

    --
    - learn to swim.
    1. Re:Pavlovian Responses?? by RKBA · · Score: 1

      How about http://thelist.com/

    2. Re:Pavlovian Responses?? by Feral+Bueller · · Score: 1
      this is FOR ISPs - I'm talking about Local POTS carriers.

      In other words, dial-up is no good without dial tone.

      Thanks though...

      --
      - learn to swim.
    3. Re:Pavlovian Responses?? by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Although you have lots of choices for your long distance provider, I don't think anyone has a choice about who owns the wires coming in to your home.

  113. T-mobile by jchristopher · · Score: 1
    T-Mobile, who offers service in St. Louis now offers unlimited flat rate GPRS data for $19.99 when you buy it with a cellular plan or $29.99 for standalone PCMCIA cards.

    Compare that to the cost of dialup and a baby-bell landline and it's a no brainer. Not to mention that you can take it with you on the road. Users in my area report speeds similar to 56k dialup.

  114. Everest Connections by KC+Swan · · Score: 1

    Won't do our original correspondent much good, but in some parts of the KC area we have a service called "Everest Connections" that I've had good luck with. Everest pulls a double strand of coax to the house, and I tell SBC and Time-Warner to get stuffed.

    With number portability I moved my two phone lines over to Everest; I signed up for a cable TV package with all the same channels that I ever watch; and while I didn't have RoadRunner, I now have Everest TrailBlazer. And I'm spending less than I did for SBC and T-W.

    I've had no complaints with the service, it's always at least as good as whatever I got from SBC and T-W.

    Alas, their parent company is struggling financially, and they've suspended any additional service rollouts. When the economy gets stronger, they hope to return to their go-go-go installation.

    Everest did get some bad press for hitting gas lines laying cable. The real problem there was the gas company in that area didn't know where their own lines were located. They lost the plans in one of several corporate sales and acquisitions, so they just made their best guess and crossed their fingers -- but decided not to spend the money to have a repair crew standing by in case they were wrong. So Everest runs the cable where the gas company says it is safe, hits the cable, and the press blames Everest.

  115. VERY IMPRESSED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in the sticks and there is no cable, no DSL, and the top speed for dialup is 28.8.

    Wow, I thought US was the country of future, now I see, in some places it has the worst factors: Arrogant egocentric people and no broadband.

  116. DSL without a landline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd dump my landline entirely and get another cell if I didn't need it for dial up internet, since I live in the sticks and there is no cable, no DSL, and the top speed for dialup is 28.8.


    In Aus you cannot get DSL without paying the Telstra Tax and forking out $20 a month.

    We have recently ungone a revolutionary (for us!) price change (and soon to be price W A R). I realise that *most* people in this world want a landline and their DSL.. but some of us are already paying our Mobile tax.. and don't care to pay for a land line we don't use.


    Yes I realise that Hell$tra ownes the copper, and can do what it likes.

  117. I live in St. Louis, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I get DSL from SBC. I don't have to pay a local access charge. I get decent rates(though they *were* better a year ago).

    Here's my suggestion: Move into the 314 area. 636 and 573(unless it's over 50 miles away) get a raw deal. SBC is nazi, but they can't make any excuses if you're in 314.

  118. Re:I live in the *same* area outside St. Louis as by dickens · · Score: 1

    I'm an Excel representative, and it is a good deal. You get "all you can eat" long distance for $50 a month plus taxes. Includes caller id, call waiting, 3-way etc.

    My mom and my mother in law live in Florida and the LD charges were killing me until I switched to Excel for my own lines. Check here to see if it's available in your area. You can sign up on-line.

    Not a bad business to be in these days.

  119. Get a Satellite Dish by LuYu · · Score: 1

    I'd dump my landline entirely and get another cell if I didn't need it for dial up internet, since I live in the sticks and there is no cable, no DSL, and the top speed for dialup is 28.8.

    I had not realized that the US was such a technological backwater. Do you realize that Japan now has 8 to 12 Mbps Net connections for residential use in Tokyo?

    Is not Internet service better than this in Mexico?

    What are other people using for alternatives to their local telephone provider?

    Why do you not just get a satellite dish? Is there a place on the continent of North America that is not covered? I do not know what the pricing for something like that might be, but it should not be too much more than ADSL in most places (that have it, that is).

    What about a cellular Internet connection? That would probably be very expensive (if, of course, it is available), but it would remain connected wherever you might be.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:Get a Satellite Dish by agentofchange · · Score: 0

      Using 2 way sat solves the upstream issue of expensive calls on the cell phone.

    2. Re:Get a Satellite Dish by twstdr00t · · Score: 1

      Pricing for satellite is expensive.. especially the $600 outlay for equipment. And then once you have the connection, it's not much better then dialup.

      --

      ---------
      AlmostFreeLinux.com
    3. Re:Get a Satellite Dish by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Ah, but Japan is smaller than California, yes? Much easier to wire up the place.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  120. I'll sum it up for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telecom == fraud.

    All of them, all companies.

    If you sell phone service you are an overbilling accounting scandal ridden mafia that deserves to die.

    H.T.H.

    P.S. This includes the LA area.

  121. Comcast Digital Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe it or not I am satisfied with Comcast digital phone.The sound quality is excellent and when I tested a dialup connection I get 52000(Too bad its 5 years to late). I use to have SBC and decided to try Comcast. I am now saving 25 bucks on my phone bill.

  122. If you're desperate there is always 2way satellite by agentofchange · · Score: 0

    You could always dump the landline and get the cell phone. For internet you could use two way satellite.

  123. CavTel by cordelya · · Score: 1

    I had local, LD, and DSL with Cavalier Telephone. I never had any serious problems with them. The only issue I ever had was getting service connected. It's actually faster to order Verizon and then call CavTel and ask them to switch. With a 12-month contract, I was paying about half what it would cost me if I were using Verizon. I don't know what their coverage area is, though....

    --
    Most people would rather be certain they're miserable than risk being happy. - Robert Anthony
  124. Alternate Carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched over to the The Neighborhood (www.theneighborhood.com) in January of this year. The Neighborhood is MCI/Worldcom, whatever they are calling themselves now. The big advantage here is you pay approximately $50 a month which includes your local loop fees and unlimited long distance. I've had no issues so far with the service and the bill ends up being just over $60 with all of the federal fees. It's nice to be able to rack up 1000 minutes of long distance calls and not worry about the price one bit.

  125. Re:I live in the *same* area outside St. Louis as by aphor · · Score: 1

    Is Excel still a Multi-Level-Marketing (Network Marketing) company?

    --
    --- Nothing clever here: move along now...
  126. Re:Not the same boat, but this works very well for by Dim_Slashdot · · Score: 1

    I...
    I...
    Fifteen times no less. I don't really care to read your budget on /.

  127. If you dump your landline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will you get out of the MAtrix?

  128. Sage Telecom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sage is not available everywhere, but you can check them out at http://www.sagetelecom.com/. They are also not the cheapest in all their markets, because of bogus municipal and county "fees" designed to prevent them being competitive. They won a big court battle with the established telecos and there's a lot of hostility. They get my vote for being 100% open and honest, as far as I can tell. They told me up front what my monthly bill would be, and it was within $1US of their estimate. Their service is the best I've tried, in spite of having to hand off work orders to SBC, who actually owns the local hardware.

  129. We use ITCDeltaComm by Corrupter · · Score: 1

    Great service, rock bottom prices, huge bandwidth. Less than half the price of Bell South. Recently Time Warner Telcomm has moved into our area with local service and data service and is very competitive. We are looking into this as well, as they have a product called Versapak that let's you break your T1 between voice and data channels and allows you to use all unused voice channels for data when they are not being used.

  130. Cavalier by Sternn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cavalier (CavTel) kicks much arse. For anyone on the East Coast who can get it, do so. They are about half the price of Verizon, offer more services, and are extremely helpful when you call them.

    And plus you don't have to deal with Verizon.

    The only problem is Verizon doesn't like it's customers switching, so as others have pointed out getting switched is an issue. Verizon screws up the orders on purpose usually meaning you will go a day or two without service. Verizon is losing you as a customer, so they really don't care if you complain or not. I know of a dozen or more people who have had them kill their service a few days early when switching.

    And Verizon also tells techs your loop distance from the CO is too long when you order CavTel DSL. However a few persistant phone calls will force them to actually send out a tech who will report this is not the case.

    In fact, two friends who had Verizon report to COVAD their loops were two small got sales calls from Verizon trying to sell them DSL just a week or so after they were told it wasn't possible.

    My suggestiong is any solution other than Verizon is good. They are evil bastards.

    -S

    --
    -Sternn
  131. If you really want to escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in a small rural area in Michigan, and the phone lines are older and slow. I have no access to Cable or DSL either, so my only alternative was to go Satellite. Upload speed is worse than 56k, but the download speed is great. The cost is alittle hefty, around $65.00 monthly, but well worth it to me because of the speedy downloads, i.e.: service packs, critical updates, etc. If you ever have to reinstall your OS, downloading the updates would take forever. Do a search on Google.com for satellite connection. You'll be able to find a satellite provider at a much lower cost.

  132. I'm with you by Uncle+Eazy · · Score: 1

    I just moved to Fenton (also just outside St. Louis). It wasn't until AFTER we had our new phone turned on with SWBell that we found out the number couldn't call St. Louis, nor receive calls from St. Louis, for free. Of course, this was after Bell assigned us a number, then a week later told us it was already assigned.

    As for Internet, I'm too far for DSL and my neighborhood (new construction) doesn't even have cable TV! But, since I host web sites from my basement, I could actually afford a T1. Only pay $400 per month from Birch.com, who also will do local phone service (but, of course, not to Fenton).

  133. I feel your pain by Fitch · · Score: 1

    I live about 1 hr from the metro area, otherwise my story is exactly the same. For local calls, unless you're just too far from cellular or your reception is bad enough to be practically unuseable in your residence, go with a wireless phone for voice. The SBC Metro package is a great deal if you make a ton of calls, but for the money you'd probably be better off with cellular if you only do a moderate amount of calling. Because of tariff restrictions the alternative local carriers probably won't be able to offer you a competitive package, and of those that I've dealt with none can hold a candle to SBC's customer service or that which you could expect from a wireless provider. To be honest the most of the CLECs that I know of or have used in the Missouri SBC LATAs are all bankrupt or heading that way fast. As for internet you have four choices as I see it: 1) Roll your own WISP - if you can gather up enough willing subscribers you can make this successful with a relatively low initial investment. You can buy used BreezeCom equipment, or if you're creative you might be able do it with off-the-shelf FHSS 802.11b gear. 2) Find/persuade/wait for someone else who's willing to do #1. 3) Satellite broadband (very high latency, useless for online gaming and interactive stuff like ssh/telnet). 4) Suffer with dialup. Luckily #2 happened for me, but their customer service has been so bad I've started considering #1 again. You will find lots of smaller communities in the area with WIFI ISPs now, as SBC will probably never roll out any type of DSL in their smaller exchanges, and cable is often not an option because the smaller cable companies won't / can't afford to belly up to the bar.

  134. What you need to do for Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Directway offers a dish package. $100 a month for the first year to pay off the dish. Then $60 dollars a month after that. I am not sure on all the deals but if you don't have cable either you might be able to get a package deal from them. You also said you would use a cell. Another internet connection is the go anywhere wireless using a PCMCIA card and a cell signal. It will run you $80 dollars a month it's not broadband like the satellite but it is twice as fast as dialup.

  135. Re:I live in the *same* area outside St. Louis as by ||Deech|| · · Score: 1

    It's possible that it is, but you don't have to join up with that stuff if you don't want to. Just get the service. It works, it's cheap and let those other guys thumb wrestle it out.

    --
    Run. I like water. Push My rutabaga.
  136. My experiences with Talk America by MikeVx · · Score: 1

    After noting dozens of screens of ISP diversions, I decided to reply directly to the posting.

    I live in Southeast Michigan. SBC had a calling area I could drive out of in 15 minutes in any direction. For people within an hours travel time, it was cheaper to drive if I planned to talk for over half an hour.

    Then I heard of Talk America, a reseller. They offered me an initial rate about $10/month higher than SBC, but with my choice of all features except privacy mangler, and, most importantly, a reasonable calling area. All but one of my friends is a toll call under the SBC scheme. In the month before converting to Talk America, I logged four minutes on my land phone. Now I log hundreds of minutes a month, getting more value than I ever got from SBC.

    I had been using cellular, but that limited me to nights and weekends because of the minute volume. Getting a cellular plan with enough minutes would have involved a jump of far more than the land-line cost.

    Now I can call friends in places like Warren and Ann Arbor and not worry about the cost. Any time of day. If I knew anyone in Howell (just at the edge of the 517 area code) I could call them at no charge. For me, that is the biggie, the rest of the features are a bonus. The no-charge calling area is the best thing for contacting non-local friends.

    There were some initial setup issues, but those got fixed. I never did get my referal credits but if that's the worst problem I have with them I'm doing well.

    --
    Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  137. I switched to ATT by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    I switched to ATT in response to SBC's pursuit of small businesses who use HTML frames. I've been quite happy. SBC called and offered me $85 to switch back; I asked them to call when they were able to rein in SBC Intellectual Property Corp.

  138. Qwest = Demon by reidman · · Score: 0

    I just moved to Tucson last month and made the stupid mistake of going with Qwest for local service. I don't make long distance calls, just local calls to get internet service and talk to friends. Got my first bill yesterday for $95.

  139. This is a Scam by chasmosis · · Score: 1

    I did a little looking in to this. A simple search on google found a number of hits discussing that this is a scam and the operator is wanted on Felony fraud, stealing, etc... charges in IOWA and Missouri.

  140. In a college neighborhood... by ssstraub · · Score: 1

    all the pizza places would be out of business with that rule in effect!

    College students count as a large portion of their customer base and most of us (ie. the smart ones) don't pay the ridiculous land line fees and have opted for a single cell phone for all of our calls.

    I'd never heard of anyone not delivering to cell phones until I read this!

  141. how? by ssstraub · · Score: 1

    How do you plug your computer modem into a cell phone? I'm not being sarcastic... Is there some kind of RJ45 adapter that goes into a cell phone? I believe laptops use IR, which regular boxes don't have.

    1. Re:how? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I thought that modern cellphones (at least some) had data ports. If they have data ports, they must be to plug into a computer, there's little else they'd be for.

    2. Re:how? by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 1

      1. Those data ports are sometimes used to connect to PDAs
      2. Technically, it is possible to connect an RJ11 cable to a cellphone. Motorola had something like that for the StarTAC a long time ago.However, if you don't have something like that, it's a royal pain. You don't want to know. Just get a data cable. Or connect with Bluetooth.

      -PantheraLeo2k3
      ________________________________________________ _
      If you were a real geek you would know that I can bite your head off.

  142. Other places for more info on CLECs by LandGator · · Score: 1

    We all sit around the campfires at USENET's comp.dcom.telecom and talk about CLECs (Competitive Local Exchange Carriers, what this fellow is inquiring about) all day, and all of the night.

    Stop by and visit us, we're mostly friendly.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  143. Vonage by caffeinex36 · · Score: 1

    I used Vonage and have not regretted it one bit.
    -Rob