Slashdot Mirror


dB Drag Racing

Exedore writes "For a paltry $80,000 outlay, you too can fight back against the punk kids blasting gangsta rap from their Honda Civics. Enter the strange (and rather loud) world of dB Drag Racing and join a small group of dedicated competitors in their quest for the loudest car sound system possible. The numbers: 130,000 watts output, 177dB, 10,000 lbs. of equipment (including the vehicle and all the sound insulation needed to protect those nearby). It might not be quite up to Disaster Area standards, but it's not far off."

397 comments

  1. Crank It Up by The+Dobber · · Score: 4, Funny


    I Wanna hear Britney Spears wail !!

    1. Re:Crank It Up by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a better idea. How about we but Brittney Spears inside one of these cars and see if we can set a new world record by pumping it up to 250 dB for a few minutes?

      That's probably loud enough to pulverize bone, but I expect elastic silicone would survive intact.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Crank It Up by Snoopy77 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you would like to see her bones crushed and her fake breasts intact? Why don't you just get a blowup doll.

      I would rather she stay looking exactly how she is and just stop singing. Perhaps we could just rupture her eardrums enough to send her tone deaf, leading to the demise of her 'singing' career.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    3. Re:Crank It Up by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      What if she just sang anyway? Ugh.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    4. Re:Crank It Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Wanna hear Britney Spears wail !!

      Then you need to get it up!!

    5. Re:Crank It Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd probably sound exactly like her second album...

      20 seconds! It's been 19! So maybe you should lick my hairy ball ass because this doesn't require 20 fucking seconds to type! ASSHOLES!

    6. Re:Crank It Up by Bush+Pig · · Score: 2, Informative

      She already _is_ tone deaf, isn't she?

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    7. Re:Crank It Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake breasts? Are you kidding? You must not watch Punk'd on MTV. If you'd seen episode with her and the way they sagged you wouldn't mention fake breasts. They only appear firm and perky when she has them strapped up.

    8. Re:Crank It Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, I don't know what you're after, but who cares about bone and silicone, these babies could blow her clothes off!

    9. Re:Crank It Up by orpheus2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps we could just rupture her eardrums enough to send her tone deaf

      This is different how...?

    10. Re:Crank It Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake breasts? Are you kidding?

      She DID get implants. Though I think she may have had them removed. That would certainly explain a severe case of saggies.

    11. Re:Crank It Up by captian+chaos · · Score: 1

      Not only do we put Brittney in the car, let's launch the car into the sun for the final act!!!

    12. Re:Crank It Up by wganz · · Score: 1

      Britney? Nope!

      Use what the Soviets used on us for jamming voice radio. What's that you ask? Simple, use bagpipes.

      Nothing, absolutely nothing, regardless how loud can drown out bagpipes. Bagpipes at 85db can cut threw and destroy any&all Gangsta' Rap regardless of the volume it is being played. Also, blows away any kewlness the players of that crap have.

      The Scottish Blackwatch Bagpipe band is the most fun I've had in a long time! 8-)

  2. Sounds like... by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 4, Funny

    *Sounds* like they need some melamine ceiling tiles.

    1. Re:Sounds like... by McAddress · · Score: 1

      That would be a cheaper way to silence the car next to you. Just build walls of ceiling tiles around him.
      Hey, its not that much of a stupider idea than wrapping your computer in them.

    2. Re:Sounds like... by jmccay · · Score: 2

      I hope they give out ear plugs with the noise they are making. I wish they would arrest these people. Most of of these cars are actually illegal. In fact, most of lesser ones are illegal too because they are too noisy. Most communities have noise regulations, and a lot of these cars shake the walls of nearby buildings. I personally hate them, and when they go by my house, I compare them to the noise of airplanes overhead (sometimes the airplanes are quieter).
      The people who have stereo systems like these have no respect for the people around them. Not everyone wants to here the latest crude soundings of the newest rapper with the base turn full volume!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    3. Re:Sounds like... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1

      read the article... everyone was WAY to quick to jump to conclusions about this... These vehicles are illegal (road wise...) They never get close to being driven, very few could actually move under their own power if they had to anyway.
      Designing a vehicle to go that loud is more than just throwing amps and speakers into it, a huge amount of engineering is involved.

    4. Re:Sounds like... by jmccay · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. There are people into this that don't go to this extreme that ARE DRIVING illegal cars because the noise level is TOO high...especially with the base turned up. This is just about the extreme high end of the competitors. I know people in my city that work to get their car as loud as they can, but they haven't gone to these extremes.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    5. Re:Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are missing the point. The dbdrag association does not approve of the idiot driving down your street at any time of day and night blasting their stereo that shakes your windows. Yes those cars (both comp vehicles and street vehicles) are illegal, but so are most of the fart can exhausts that the rice burners have, along with ALL Harley Davidson exhausts. Yet, it is always the damn kid and his stereo, not the 50yr old with his Harley whose exhaust can drown out any noise within 2 miles.
      There is a difference between the sport and hobby of car audio and the blissfully ignorant kids who most of you are complaining about. If you weren't so ignorant you would be able to make the distinction.
      Plus most of you have probably never realized their is a sound quality competition and enthusiasm also where the goal is not to be as loud as possible, but to reproduce the sound as accurately as possible and not at mind numbing levels.
      So all I ask is that you become educated on a subject before you comment on it. Have a nice day!!

  3. Insulation? by sburnett · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Protect those nearby"?? Isn't the whole point of these things to annoy the hell out everyone in a 10 mile radius?

    1. Re:Insulation? by PetWolverine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Annoy, yes, but you don't necessarily want to kill them.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    2. Re:Insulation? by digtl88 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but there is no way that people are not going to hear this. I can only imagine how load it can get to.

  4. What the?!? by Thelonious+Monk · · Score: 0

    How much many more news articles is slashdot gonna post from that one popsci issue.... FAWK SAKES!

  5. Check out my new weapon of choice by Pandion · · Score: 5, Funny

    I choose to fight back with an EMP :P

    1. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nah... I'd prefer a Herf Gun

      Capable of "stalling cars at a distance"...

      perfect

    2. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by mc_wilson · · Score: 1

      The sentinals are coming! Hmmp, people tell me the Matrix isn't real.

    3. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Jerf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can not tell you the number of times I fantasized about that while living in dorms, and not sleeping at 1am because someone needs to hear their rap at 90 dB.

      To anyone who puts other people through that... try thinking about the fact that you're being a real jackass. I once had a roommate who could sleep right through that without being disturbed, but there are quite a few of us on the opposite end of the spectrum, too, who can't help but be annoyed at least, and made physically ill (headaches, nausea a couple times) by your crap. I truly wish this was just whining and I could choose not to be affected that way, because believe me, I would in a heartbeat, but it's not a choice.

      (Of course, in my experience, the kind of person who may be reading this site may be proud of their speaker set but aren't the ones blasting it five or six hours a day, week in, week out, any time of day or night. But still, think about your actions and please consider others.)

      Oh, and a hint to anyone about to move to college, especially a larger one: Every dorm administrator thinks their facilities are quiet, and will say so if you ask. This is because they live in air-conditioned offices as far away from the students as possible (possibly in another building), come in at 9am (when the students are all sleeping), and go home at 5pm (about two hours before the party really starts). They also have absolutely no interest in actually working to make the facilities quieter, even if they explicitly advertise it as a feature. If you are as bothered by this as I am (perhaps 1 or 2%), seriously consider moving *way* off campus. I now work at the University I went to, and a 20 minute drive was far enough away. (Note Michigan State University is huge; you can probably live closer to smaller ones.)

    4. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by mingot · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you were a real fun roomate.

    5. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by ces · · Score: 1

      Oh, and a hint to anyone about to move to college, especially a larger one: Every dorm administrator thinks their facilities are quiet, and will say so if you ask. This is because they live in air-conditioned offices as far away from the students as possible (possibly in another building), come in at 9am (when the students are all sleeping), and go home at 5pm (about two hours before the party really starts). They also have absolutely no interest in actually working to make the facilities quieter, even if they explicitly advertise it as a feature. If you are as bothered by this as I am (perhaps 1 or 2%), seriously consider moving *way* off campus. I now work at the University I went to, and a 20 minute drive was far enough away. (Note Michigan State University is huge; you can probably live closer to smaller ones.)

      Not all colleges are that way. The University of Washington has RA's on every floor. They will enforce the noise rules on quiet floors and in the quiet dorms. Addmittedly this doesn't help for noise coming from another floor, another dorm, the frats, or out in the street.

      Due to the UW's location in the middle of Seattle some of the dorms are actually quieter than the surrounding neighborhood because there aren't sirens and other urban noises out in the street at all hours of the night.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    6. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Phrack · · Score: 1

      Easy enough.. get an old Nextel phone and just make some calls next to 'em.

      Had a bud who used to do that at audio competitions. Really drove 'em nuts.

      --
      Dump the IRS - http://www.fairtax.org
    7. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how would one, ahem, build such a device.... instructions anyone?

    8. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will enforce the noise rules on quiet floors and in the quiet dorms

      Hey- I used to beat up the kids on the "quiet floors" for fun.

    9. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by nitehorse · · Score: 1

      Heh. "old" Nextel phones?

      The current ones still do it. I know exactly what you're talking about, because it's annoying as all hell.

      (For those who don't know: A few of the Motorola phones that Nextel provides have the annoying habit of generating a really evil distortion in speakers. Especially louder speakers. The distortion seems to happen whenever the phone makes contact with the outside world - checking the voicemail service for new messages, receiving an incoming call, etc.)

    10. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was! He used to take it hard up the arse like a real trooper - barely even squealed.

    11. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      I truly wish this was just whining and I could choose not to be affected that way, because believe me, I would in a heartbeat, but it's not a choice.
      Wait until you have a baby. Chronic sleep deprivation really helps you sleep through just about anything.

      Funny thing is, I still wake up in a heartbeat when the baby makes a noise.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    12. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I think a guy two doors down in my apartment building just bought an active sub. Most of the time it is ok but he has gotten bad on several occasions. Nice thing about Ottawa is you can complain any time of the day about stereos being too loud. Already complained once. Another 2 times and he is out on his ass.
      He also screams at his girlfriend and smokes dope on the balcony and nobody would be disappointed if he left.
      The dope there is nothing we can do. Since the court ruling that stated that anything less than 30 grams is not chargable (long story there and I wouldn't be the person to explain it as I know the minimum about it) the cops won't come around for it. The guy in between us though said the next time he hears them fighting he is going to call the cops.
      Personally I think the whole Marijuana issue is stupid and should be decriminalized (but I don't touch the stuff) but when you have your boss over for dinner and you get a waft of BC gold coming in the window, it is kind of embarrassing.

    13. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      We had those things at my last job. I kept it next to my crt. I always new when a call was about to come in cause my screen would flicker. Nothing like being in public and having someone taklign out of your pocket.

    14. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Nice thing about Ottawa is you can complain any time of the day about stereos being too loud.

      Wow, sounds like a nice place to move (seriously)

      If only the Quebec government would pass that law for the whole province, I'd be set.

      In the meantime, I'll check out those HERF guns...
      (by only shooting red honda civics hatchback, you get 99% chance of hitting all those 500W+ morons)

    15. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Ottawa is not in Quebec, it is in Ontario.

      The law in question is a municipal bi-law, lots of other municipalities in Ontario have similar laws on the books now.

      --
      No Comment.
    16. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

      if you are fluent in german, try this. maybe your babelfish will help, or someone wants to waste some time and provides a translation..?

      the pictures do in a way speak for themselves. :)

      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    17. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moooom, stop posting on /. !!

      it's so embarassing!

    18. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Same to you.

    19. Re:Check out my new weapon of choice by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      I dunno...an emp burst right in the middle of one of the competitons - takes out all of them at once.

  6. oooh by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    My sound system is loud enough to cause me physical injuries! Hooray!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have permanent hearing loss in my left ear due to a dual 500w Urban amp setup (yeah, cheap, but I was in HS at the time) with two Dr. Crankenstein subs.

      It's really not funny.

    2. Re:oooh by little_fluffy_clouds · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Every year I go to the Summernats held in Canberra, Australia. In 2001 I took a nice picture:

      Summernats Sound Off Entrant

      The interesting thing is here that he has his windscreen strapped on, due to the extreme volume shifting the air in the cabin enough to dislodge it.

      --
      What were the skies like when you were young?
    3. Re:oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not as if you hearing loss should come as a surprise to someone who blasts their "system." Extremely loud music = hearing damage? Who'd thunk it. Seriously, I have no sympathy for these people (and abhor them) as much as smokers. They are too ignorant to realize the damage they are doing to themselves and those around them.

    4. Re:oooh by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You laugh, but the SNCF (French National Railroads) have trouble recruiting new train engineers (drivers, for you UK types). Their medical standards are so stringent that they have a hard time finding kids with unimpaired hearing, thanks to all those loud discos.

      Even worse, whenever a kid shows up for the medical wearing a walkman, he is automatically rejected...

    5. Re:oooh by MrLint · · Score: 1

      I think lots of money for r&d should be pumped into this. Why? So that we can assist the future darwin award winners win faster.

    6. Re:oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that image - one of the biggest collections of dorks I will ever see.

    7. Re:oooh by radixvir · · Score: 1

      i thought the funniest part was that there isnt enough room to sit so you cant drive, but you couldnt drive anyways because the thing weighs 10,000 pounds. i think that kind of defeats the point of it being a car when you have to tow it around anyways

    8. Re:oooh by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      I agree. It's kinda like having a big, car-shaped speaker. What's the point?

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    9. Re:oooh by ces · · Score: 1

      I figure the idiots with the car audio systems that can be heard from 3 or more blocks away will get theirs. Most of them will probably be stone deaf by the time they are 30.

      While that's small consolation when some fucktard's audio system is shaking your house from a block away at 3am, it still is enough to keep me from going postal on them.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    10. Re:oooh by garymm · · Score: 1

      don't "abhor" people for choosing to do something that they find fun. Abhor them for puffing their smoke in your face or keeping you awake with their music, but why should you get upset if a person wants to damage his or her own body by having some stupid fun? I don't smoke or listen to really loud music, but whoever does, that's fine with me. just don't force me to.

    11. Re:oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, they're worse than computer dorks. At least the computer variety is useful. These guys are just plain idiots.

    12. Re:oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every year I go to the Summernats held in Canberra, Australia. In 2001 I took a nice picture:
      Summernats Sound Off Entrant

      The interesting thing is here that he has his windscreen strapped on, due to the extreme volume shifting the air in the cabin enough to dislodge it.


      The thing I'm wondering about is whether that Fusion Car Audio & Security system is like an all-in-one solution? So when the carjacker comes up trying to steal your car, you just blast your music and it makes them go deaf and fall to the ground twitching? Ahhhh so thats why they always have such loud stereo systems in the ghetto.

    13. Re:oooh by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "It's really not funny."

      It is - coz you did it to yourself.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    14. Re:oooh by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Is that a Hyundrai Accent?

      What an unbelievably ludicrous machine to spend money on.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    15. Re:oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abhor them because in the end you end up paying for the medical treatments they (and others, in case of passive smoking) need.

    16. Re:oooh by Jonner · · Score: 1

      They call train engineers "drivers" in the UK? That really does make more sense, IMHO. Sensible blokes, those Brits. They were using the language before we were over here in the colonies, so it's not too surprising that they have a better grasp of it.

    17. Re:oooh by garbs · · Score: 1

      It sure looks like it.

      It's sad when I hear a nice car, exhaust, sound system or whatever, and I turn around and look, to see a riced up hyundai excel or any other hyundai pos.

      They just seem to be everywhere, bah humbug.

  7. So what kind of stickers... by writertype · · Score: 5, Funny

    do you need to win a dB drag race?

    1. Re:So what kind of stickers... by mc_wilson · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you not see 2 Fast 2 Furious? Stickers arn't enough anymore! You need ground lighting!

    2. Re:So what kind of stickers... by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 3, Funny

      I still stand by my belief that the makers of that movie missed out on a great naming possibility:

      The Faster and the Furiouser

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    3. Re:So what kind of stickers... by Rectum2003 · · Score: 1

      Goatse stickers! Then everybody around will know you're a /. reader.

    4. Re:So what kind of stickers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

    5. Re:So what kind of stickers... by overclocker89 · · Score: 1

      It's a pride thing

      --
      Visit my blog at www.thedailymac.com
    6. Re:So what kind of stickers... by DG · · Score: 2

      If you can't be fast, be pretty.

      If you can't be pretty, be loud.

      DG

      --
      Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    7. Re:So what kind of stickers... by Cloud+9 · · Score: 1

      Holy sheeyat.... A sub-thousander! I didn't think there were any around anymore.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    8. Re:So what kind of stickers... by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

      "I run XP and all I got was this lame Honda Civic"

      --
      my sig
    9. Re:So what kind of stickers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the third movie would be The Fastest and the Furiousest.

      The Fasterer and the Furiouserer?

    10. Re:So what kind of stickers... by Grahf666 · · Score: 1

      Of course there are, they're named CmndrTaco, Hemos, CoyboyNeal, etc....

    11. Re:So what kind of stickers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Faster and the Furiouser

      This broken english certainly matches up with the dumb-shit rice boy types who like that crap.

      bunch of loud-muffler shit-for-brains.

  8. The problem is... by GeckoFood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it's a single frequency sound, not music. That said, it still sounds better than that crap coming from the car next to you at the stoplight...

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
    1. Re:The problem is... by overclocker89 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can't drive the car. Read the article. it would be, "It still sounds better than the crap coming from the car next to you in the parking lot."

      --
      Visit my blog at www.thedailymac.com
    2. Re:The problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Its a car that you can't fit in, that you couldn't drive if you wanted too, that has a "stereo" system that costs more than some houses, that you can't play music on, and that you can't listen to if you could.

      In other words, this is a complete and utter waste of everyones time; quite possibly one of the most pointless, sadest, fucking idiots in the world. I know, lets make motorbikes with no wheels and so big you couldn't ride it anyway! It'll be really cool, and we won't waste our time being dorks! No, really!

      I hope every last one of these idiots accidently gets killed at the next meeting when some other idiot leaves a window open..

  9. Hah by MC68040 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those guy's don't stand a chance against my overclocked athlon, that thing sounds like a jet engine, and I mean it, it can even hum tunes if you adjust the fans real fast or with an automatic controller. Promise ;).

    http://funstuff.digital-bless.com/

    1. Re:Hah by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? What about an overclocked Athlon with an overclocked GeForce FX?

    2. Re:Hah by Asprin · · Score: 1


      You leavbe my damn leaf blower out of this!

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
  10. little known fact by csimicah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These guys have to be starting to bump into limiting returns... the maximmum possible dB in free air is 194 IIRC. I wonder if it would be legal to pressurize the vehicle to achieve higher max dB's...

    1. Re:little known fact by mikeophile · · Score: 1
      If you aimed the drivers at the ground, would you get over-compression?

      For that matter, if you aimed 194dB at the ground, would you need wheels?

    2. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yeah but remember dB is logarithmic, 194 is a shitload louder than 150 or whatever they're doing now.

      A BIG SHITLOAD!!!

    3. Re:little known fact by csimicah · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think they're up to 177, but your point still stands... 17 more dB is a long way to go.

      To clarify the first post, 194 dB is what you get when your sound pressure wave goes from atmospheric (14.7 psi) down to the lowest possible pressure (0 psi). Think about that... the speaker cones are actually fighting to pull a vacuum inside the vehicle. Not exactly something the speakers in your living room have to deal with!

      You definitely wouldn't want to be sitting in there... I think your eardrums would be woggling back and forth quite a bit. Uhhh... once.

    4. Re:little known fact by coyote-san · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That reminds me of a Discover(?) or Scientific American magazine article on materials processing with sound. Hundreds, or was it thousands, of dB. I remember them commenting that the sound so intense it would set your hair on fire... but you wouldn't notice since your flesh would be liquified.

      This has absolutely nothing to do with the topic, of course, other than the wonderful mental image of what it would do to somebody trying to impress the neighborhood with their sound system.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    5. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have raised the pressure inside their cars using compressed gasses and it is considered cheating.

    6. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are forgetting that sound drivers also compress air well beyond atmospheric pressure as well as evacuate it in the wave trough. While you can't evacuate past a vacuum, you can compress air quite a bit more at the wave peak.

    7. Re:little known fact by marauder404 · · Score: 1

      Most competition cars are already sealed. They use all kinds of means to make the car completely airtight, including big meatlocker-like door latches.

    8. Re:little known fact by turbod · · Score: 1

      I beleive 180dB can cause your hair to catch fire. Seems like that is the pressure of sound waves in the new sonic-compressor fridges.

    9. Re:little known fact by csimicah · · Score: 1

      Right... 194 dB is what you get when you go back and forth between 0 and 2atm. Now, if your wave is centered about a pressure greater than 1 atm, then you can achieve higher levels, thus my question about starting out with a pressurized vehicles.

      I supposed you could accomplish the pressurization by running the speakers in a regime not centered about their middle position... i.e., you close the doors, then the speakers all immediately move inwards pressurizing the vehicle, then start oscillating about that point. Not sure if these vehicles are sealed well enough to make that happen, though.

    10. Re:little known fact by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      I think they're up to 177, but your point still stands... 17 more dB is a long way to go.

      Uh, slightly. So you basically need ten times the power to increase 10 dB. If it takes 130,000 watts to do 177 dB then you'd need a nuclear reactor for 194 dB. What would it be? 8 million watts or so? (just a guess, it's too late for calculating)

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    11. Re:little known fact by hdparm · · Score: 1
      I don't know much (well, anything) about this stuff but these people claim 155dB when testing 1500W model. Reading $ amounts from popsci article, Lomu series sounds like a big bang for just a few hundreds.

      While you're there, check the latest RMS definition! Just scroll a bit down the page - can't miss it.

    12. Re:little known fact by ndinsil · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's nothing, I've got a car that can make 1.21 Gigawatts! Can't get it up past 88 mph for some reason, though.

      Sorry, had to do it.

    13. Re:little known fact by hdparm · · Score: 1

      Oh and since it's after midnight in States - Hapy Independence Day to all US Slashdoters! God bless.

    14. Re:little known fact by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

      Another little known fact is the World Record Holder band for decibel level when playing live "in free air". 160dB - OUCH!!! I've never heard any of their songs, though.

    15. Re:little known fact by hdparm · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm old. The latest one I've heard was ZZ Top's record :o(

    16. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If 194 dB is the limit from vacuum to 1 atm, you forget what overlapping waves can do...

      Waves from many sources can constructively (or destructively) interfere to create much higher intensities than what you get from only one wave. Of course, you need to model it on a computer or just be lucky.

      I'm surprised no one has tried to use a small explosion to fool the mike. Explosives create pressure waves in air - that should do the job :)

    17. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and sorry once again.

      Dr. Brown used Jiggawatts

    18. Re:little known fact by femto · · Score: 1

      Does that mean the quantum vacuum comes into play, causing the space-time continuum to fold in on itself and explode, when a sound system reaches 194dB? Cool! :-)

    19. Re:little known fact by Read+Icculus · · Score: 1

      I'll save you guys the time it takes to check out the link. The RMS definition is GNU/db. Sorry in advance.

      --
      Anti-social? My code is just platform-specific.
    20. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry to dissappoint you but RTFL!


      Root
      Mean
      Square

    21. Re:little known fact by Read+Icculus · · Score: 1

      d00d |\|0 5|-|17. It was a joke. Albeit one that will not get modded funny, but any chance to rip on RMS on /. must be taken. Especially when someone sez "RMS". Sorry to offend your "everything must be 100% correct or else I bitch" sensibilities. Don't you have some spelling mistakes to correct? Or possibly an improper usage of "their"?

      --
      Anti-social? My code is just platform-specific.
    22. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      sorry one last time.

      Dr. Brown mispronounced Gigawatts.

    23. Re:little known fact by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      And happy "Ungrateful Day" to everyone in England!

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    24. Re:little known fact by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      Isn't 170 enough to set off a fatal pressure wave in the brain, though?

      They're already waaaaaaay past permanent instant hearing loss, though, so it all seems rather trivial TBH. What's the point in a car sound system you can't get within 10m of?

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    25. Re:little known fact by Cloud+9 · · Score: 1

      Because they can?

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    26. Re:little known fact by Sdrawcab · · Score: 1

      I read an article about Navy sonar. Recent U.S Navy sonar testing in the Bahamas reached sound levels of 235 decibels.

    27. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marty, It's Doc, I'm in the future again. Stop posting your lame ass jokes on slashdot ! You'll never get a girlfriend this way and the savior of humanity will not be born !

    28. Re:little known fact by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      They're the Kings of Metal!!! They're trad metal taking to it's (almost hammy) extreme. I enjoy them myself. Kings of Metal is probably the album to pick if you wanna give them a listen. don;t drive while listening to Wheels of Fire.

    29. Re:little known fact by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      You mean "Fuck Off Puritans Day" (thanks to Greg Proops).

    30. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing, I've got a car that can make 1.21 Gigawatts! Can't get it up past 88 mph for some reason, though.

      Roads, where we're going, we don't need roads.

    31. Re:little known fact by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      While "Unrgrateful Day" seems easier to say, yours does have that added bit of accuracy. How about a merger? "Fuck Off Ungrateful Puritans Day"

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    32. Re:little known fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do the english reallly have an 'ungrateful day"? what for?

    33. Re:little known fact by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      A mobile sound system that draws more power than the running car can supply and which puts out more volume than you can safely use in the vehicle seems to fit several definitions of useless to me, I'm afraid.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  11. Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Why doesn't someone build/sell a small EMP weapons? You know, enough to reboot anything electronic CD player/radio within 20 feet?

    Hell, i'd camp out at the store the night before to buy one of those.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God, I sound like a tard. One more time:

      Does anyone build/sell small EMP weapons? You know, strong enough to reboot anything electronic, like a CD or a radio, within like 20 feet?

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    2. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      God, I sound like a tard.

      Yes, you do. At least you know who to blame.

    3. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please shut up and go drool over the matrix yet again, fan boy.

    4. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      In your defense, since you got to horrible responses, I was wondering the same thing. I'd love to have something like that. I thought it was a good question anyway :)

    5. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by localghost · · Score: 2, Informative

      If by "reboot" you mean "destroy" (and I think you do), the magnetron from a microwave will do fine. You will need a microwave horn to aim it, though, or you'll boil your blood.

    6. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well since you are so persistent, here are a few reasons why you can't buy them and even if they were for sale you wouldnt:

      1) In reality, you wouldn't have the bals to use it.

      2) If by some miracle you did, the guy you used it on would beat the crap out of you.

      3) Would they charge you with murder or just manslaughter after the guy with the pacemaker died?

      4) replacing your entire electrical system in your car every time you used it would get costly.

      Any more questions?

    7. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Farrell · · Score: 1

      Just a heads up, EMP are real things, atleast the theory is. And I do agree, I'd love a small EMP generator, right when my teachers are about to put in my grades, shut down the computers, then make a deal to bring them back up for better grades ;)

      --
      I want you to assume that all spelling and grammar errors are intentional. Thank You.
    8. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get ahold of two high power (40+ Watt) Motorola 800 MHz 2-way radios. Program the frequency of one of the radios about 1000 Hz higher or lower than the other radio. Example: 820.000 MHz & 820.001 MHz. Get two spaced, directional antennas (one for each radio) and point them at your target. The non-linear mixing in the sound system's unshielded semiconductors or audio/power lines will result in a constant 1000 Hz tone coming over their stereo, causing them to turn it down.

      You can practice using two FRS (family) radios transmitting on the same channel. Put them near your monitor/TV or any speakers and you'll hear a squeal.

      Other ideas include HERF guns

    9. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 5, Informative

      Go to www.4hv.org, go to the buy and sell thread, and ask someone if they will sell you a HERF unit, and tell them what you need it for.

    10. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      First of all, notice that I'm not the original poster, so I'm not being "so persistent".

      Anyway, yes I do have more questions plus comments.

      1) I would have the balls to use it, in fact, so stfu

      2) How would the guy know it was me? Say I turn it on, on the train when someone is being annoying on their cellphone. I know you're gonna say it would shut the whole train down, but I think the train has more tolerance than a cell phone, and I'd make sure to put the emitter near the cell phone. (By the way, how about cell phone jammers, how can I get one of those?)

      3) How would they know it was me? Also, isn't EMP emission protected speech? (YES I'M JOKING)

      4) I wouldn't do it near my car.

    11. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Farrell · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry I'm not l33t enough for the Anonymous Coward, and sorry I *gasp* made a joke NOT INVOLING SOVIET RUSSIA!!!!!! HOW COULD I???!!! I'm so glad you've helped me see the errors of my ways, thank you for taking the time from your usual trolling to point this out to me. I am EVER so greatful

      --
      I want you to assume that all spelling and grammar errors are intentional. Thank You.
    12. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Sure, ok, name the last few illegal vigilante things you've done. And by that i mean outside of your basement.

      2) Exactly how small do you think an emp generating device would be? You would have it in your pocket connected to a double a battery?

      3) Maybe because you'd be the only freak walking around with a ton of electronics giggling when all the shit around them died?

      4) So you are going to put it all on a grocery cart and wander around downtown hoping some guy in a loud car drives by so you can blast them? ooohhhkay

    13. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if your neighbors honda is in the driveway making a ton of noise 13 hours a day 7 days a week, why don't you call the cops instead of sitting around making up stories about shit you'll never do about it?

    14. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      appology accepted, just don't let it hapen again.

    15. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by sleeper0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An interesting paper debunking EMP guns along with a bunch of background info on EMP and stories of hackers tricking the news media into running bogus EMP gun stories.

    16. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by mingot · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Wait a second... Is this the same slashdot that got so pissed off when the sentator from Utah thought it would be a good idea to destroy file traders computers?

    17. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that noone here is saying these HERF guns should be legal only for them. If the loud-stereo-tards want, they can get one too and fight back. All the more power to them, unless I pick them off first.

    18. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've got to be kidding, the first time someone used a gun like that on a /. reader because they didn't like what they were doing you all would be crying up a storm.

    19. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Considering I not only have built these, but worked on them in the military, I find the article in question sort of puzzling.

      FREENET=FREESPEECH

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    20. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by FFFish · · Score: 1

      There's radio override built into CD Players now. Or, at least, some: there's a formal "emergency response" radio frequency that better players are supposed to recognize and use to alert drivers of oncoming fire/ambulance vehicles.

      I also suspect that one could beam a timing-signal frequency that would override/bugger-up the CD player's timing circuits.

      What you really want is a way to induce a very large square wave into the speakers. zapem!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    21. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by FFFish · · Score: 1

      And then there are sound frequencies that supposedly induce bowel movements.

      The person who invents the radio/radar/whatever gun that can have a car's stereo make the driver drop a load in his pants is going to make a lot of money.

      Just imagine. You're stopped at the red light. Some schmuck pulls up with his bass-thumping crap rap music spewing mofo lyrics at everyone within six blocks distance. You punch The Big Red button. The EMP fires off. And middle-class whitey gangsta-wannabe shits his pants.

      Oh, please, please -- someone invent this device already!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    22. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's called a 100 watt HF radio transmitting morse code.

      JD

    23. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      God, I sound like a tard

      A bastard? Nah, everyone feels that way. Hey, would it do for cell phones too?

      I wants one!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    24. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      boil stagnant blood, maybe. on the human body only two things need to be 'shielded' from the microwaves emitted by a kitchen microwave, the eyeballs, and testicles, both of which do not have enough blood flow to cool themselves fast enough. if you're curious, they end up like hardboiled eggs. fun visual. Granted, if you stand infront of a microwave unshielded long enough (more than two minutes or so at a time, I would suspect), your body will overheat and you will die, but your body is notoriously good at dissipating heat, especially when you start to sweat.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    25. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't place my finger on it, but for some reason, I doubt such a device would be FCC compliant. ;)

    26. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but i just don't believe someone that builds weapons for the military brags about it on slashdot. Especially with a sig that says freenet=freedom. I call bullshit.

    27. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      On South Park, it's known as the "Brown Note."

    28. Re:Yeah, thats super. We all need more of this. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

      That shit should be required by law if you ask me. Not just for safety, but to allow the rest of us to drive without hearing THUM THUM THUM THUM from the nearest bozo who hasn't quite figured out that he's in public.

      Kids this this weren't held enough as children.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

  12. I love the punk kids.... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still have my stereo in my car from the 80's when I did the SPL scene...

    I absolutely love having some wannabe pull up with his sky-hook wing and blasting ICP and trying to look cool... when I look at them, put in ear plugs and Blast them hard with either whiney country or something else that they would find horribly obnoxious... (Pointer sisters works great!)

    I produce a tiny 112DbI but then I have only 1000 watts in 11 year old amps and rockford fosgate speakers in that convertable... but I completely drown out the stereo they are listening to in their car.

    you CANT beat a custom 7th order isobarik subwoofer box.... the off the shelf junk is just that.... 100% junk.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I love the punk kids.... by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Where do you live that people drive around bumping ICP? Out here most people bump Dre produced bullshit. ICP doesn't have that low bass that the kiddie like.

    2. Re:I love the punk kids.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Todays kids have lost there way, but it's not there fault. There was a generation when cars went from big, fast, and loud, to small, slow, and quite. There children of that generation just don't know good quility equipment. That goes for there cars as well.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Nah, there are posers in every generation, it's just that this one prefers small, fast, and loud over big, fast and loud. Yeah, I know, people make fun of the spoiler and the scoop, but believe it or not, they actually serve purpose on that car. Besides, it's hard to argue with 300hp and AWD in a car that's actually a bit smaller than all the poser Civics. :)

    4. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      ha ha ha! You go, man. Poetic justice at its best.

      Question, though: why would a person want a seventh-order crossover? Won't that create a pretty tight passband? I'm just askin'; I don't know enough about audio to really know what I'm talking about, just enough to pretend I do ^_^

      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    5. Re:I love the punk kids.... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Blast them hard with either whiney country

      Works for imploding attacking Martians' brains too! :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nice one buddy.. 112 dB is hardly uber load though.

      Isobarik - two woofers basically facing each other, with a very small area of space so the cones do not touch when fully extended. The woofers are out of phase (+ and - connected the opposite) meaning that as woofer 1's cone extends out, woofer 2's cone is moving back), it is basically push-pull. The main function of isobarik configurations is that the optimum enclosure of a sub is halved, so instead of needing say 2 cubic feet per woofer for a good frequency response you now need 1 cubic foot for the both of them, the configuration is around 3dB less efficient than two woofers in a box (or so they say).

      The benefit of isobarik configurations is that the frequency response of the box becomes very flat strangely enough.

      I have an isobarik configurated box (2 15"s) but i would hardly consider it the reason why it is loud. Nor would I consider 7th order crossovers but he may be talking about a custom enclosure. Very creative people can produce amazing results spl and quality wise from creative boxing.

      And anyone who buys a prefab enclosure deserves what they get. When one buys a sub they should design the box to their own requirements. Depending on whether you want punchy or deep bass, loud or flat frequency response etc.. this comes down to enclosure size, shape and porting (or not porting).

    7. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But today's whiny gen-x'ers still haven't learned to spell or use punctuation.

    8. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      you CANT beat a custom 7th order isobarik subwoofer box....

      *I* can.

      I did high end car audio for a living for quite a while, but some of my customers didn't really want high end so much as maximum boom. The customer is always right, eh?

      Well, take one boom-lovin' customer with Mom's credit card, add an installer with an engineering background, and you have some serious bass. I recall getting high 120's at 17Hz (yes, seventeen cycles per second, measured by my LinearX LMS system -- poor man's Audio Precision) out of four secondhand Soundstream 8's in a BMW, f'rinstance, and with a good ole acoustic suspension design.

      Your vented bandpass boomeroo probably moves some air, but I hope it's not "seventh order" -- that would be a waste of power. The "order" of a box roughly works like this:
      • First order: 6dB/octave (or so) highpass at (about) driver Fs, or "infinite baffle".
      • Second order: 12dB/octave highpass at enclosre F3, generally acoustic suspension (sealed volume lower than driver's Vas).
      • Third/Fourth order: 18-24dB/octave highpass at enclosure F3, generally a standard bass reflex (vented, "ported") enclosure. Slope varies depending on tuning, rule of thumb is 24dB/octave.
      • "Fifth Order": Sealed bandpass enclosure with 12dB/ocatve highpass above acoustic suspension chamber's F3 and 18dB/octave lowpass below vented ("front") enclosure's F3. Got its "order" by adding low and high pass characteristics.
      • "Sixth order": Either a "fifth order" enclosure with an additional electrical lowpass filter (think "coil") or a vented bandpass design with a 18dB/octave highpass above "rear" chamber F3 and 18dB/octave lowpass below "front" chamber F3.
      • "Seventh order": Vented bandpass design with and additional electrical lowpass filter (think "coil" again) or a sealed bandpass enclosure with a 12dB/octave lowpass filter (think "cap and coil" or "active crossover").
      • ...
      • "Tenth order": Vented bandpass with additional 12dB/octave high and lowpass -- or -- 24dB/octave lowpass filters (think "gang o' caps'n'coils" or "decent active crossover").
      The "orders" tell you very little and are pretty arbitrary. Some marketing schlub at Rockford/Kicker/JL Audio overheard one of the R&D guys talking and thought "seventh order" sounded cool cuz seven is, like, a totally rad number and would rule and stuff.

      Those coils are just heaters unless you only have two amplifier channels, so you really DON'T want a "seventh order" boomerator ... unless ... dear $DEITY, please tell me your installer sold you an active crossover and at least bi-amped the system.

      Isobaric (yeah, Kicker coined "Isobarik", but I always thought it was dumb) loading allows you to make the box a lot smaller for a given resonance at the cost of 6dB in power efficiency vs. driving the two speakers normally. You're usually better off just using a single speaker one size down from the ones you're thinking of doubling up if you're hurting for space, but sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do. It's also an excellent way for an installer to sell twice as many speakers in a given boomola. The customer isn't getting ripped off, though, because he gets to say "isobari[c/k]" ... which commands respect from the guys and draws in hot chicks like moths around a lightbulb.

      I'm glad you enjoy your system -- be careful of your hearing, though. Oh -- and don't say "seventh order" again or I will lecture you a second time. Go and sin no more.

      Sigh ... I kinda miss those days, but my back and shoulders don't.
    9. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      Yaaawwwwwnnnn.... Personally I just listen to what comes out of the speakers , not jerk off
      over the specs of setups that will make me go deaf. Audio equipment is a means to an end, not an
      end in itself.

    10. Re:I love the punk kids.... by s10god · · Score: 1

      If your object is pure pain try, Hampster Dance or Aqua....

    11. Re:I love the punk kids.... by nacturation · · Score: 1
      Todays kids have lost there way, but it's not there fault. There was a generation when cars went from big, fast, and loud, to small, slow, and quite. There children of that generation just don't know good quility equipment.

      Speaking of losing *their* way, there are three ways to spell the word that sounds like "they're". Clearly the children of your generation just don't know good "quility" grammar and spelling. Now shut up and be "quite" already.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    12. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I have seen some custom boxes that should not work. They violate every rule, and if you do the math they DO NOT make sense... yet they kick the living hell out of everything around them.

      Many of the guys in the 80's and early 90's paid attention to getting the most DB per watt and speaker as really good amps were horribly priced.

      Today, anyone can have 1.2 megawatts in a car... all it takes is a credit card...

      The guys that compete in the 300 watts and less category are the ones that impress me the most... The top 3 guys always were the same... people that were engineering geniuses making sub boxes or speaker layouts that put the losers in the 1000> watt categlry in the sad sounding category.

      I really dont miss those days... I miss talking to the guys that were cool and would gladly talk to you about their designs and what they did...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:I love the punk kids.... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      I really like have my loud stereo for bikers.

      I was sitting at a light in town 2 weeks ago and whole pack of Harley's came up behind me and kept revving their engines.

      Flip a switch, turn a knob, and they have to listen to me instead. Oh, and I have 2000 watts so.... mine's bigger than yours :P

      BTW, 112 Db is child's play these days. Really, I don't even think my current system is that good. I would never compete with it.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    14. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      the response curve of a isobarik setup is different from a single speaker setup. It's flatter across the bandpass of the box. and does sound more solid in the lower end. I spend 6 months working on the box that is in that old car. rebuilt it 12 times and Yes I was trying to get the oomph in a smaller space... when you have a friend with a spectrum analyzer you can learn alot!

      4 15 inch stiff cone woofers sound tighter and harder in bass than 2 12's that would have been correct in that same space. I also loose-polyfilled the rear chambers of the cabinet which got rid of the damned boomy sound and was more faithful in low frequency reproduction.

      coupled with the 8" mid-bass drivers in the rear and the plethora of midranges and tweets..as well as dynamat (the older thick stuff not that new thin junk) all over the place to avoid sounding like ...well you know.. Yeah, I do love it. it still sounds better than anything else that comes out of a stereo-shop. and it's quad amped with an active crossover system. I also have a "bass restoration system" in there but I don't use it as it severly colors the low end.. I used to carry shooters-earmuffs in the car, but with the "TERRORIST" paranoia... I decided it wasn't a good idea to carry them anymore... from my youth, I have burned out my midrange in my hearing from going to concerts.... so now I don't take any chances... if it goes past 1/4 the hearing protection goes in.

      You reminded me of something though.. I watched a car burn in the parking lot of Best Buy this week.. fresh out of the install bays... funny how the fire started by the battery... and I'll bet $100.00 the installers didn't put in a fuse block at the battery.... yikes!

      Oh, and I call it a 7th order because that is something people understand... it's based on the basic design of a 7th order cabinet as you described (vented) but really is severly modified based on some old Bose designs to give a HUGE peak in the 30-60HZ range. with a slow rolloff to the lower and a sharper front drop. I dont care what anyone says about Bose.. they are cabinet design geniuses.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:I love the punk kids.... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      You neglected to mention how they left you at the line when the light turned green... Hehe, just joking around -- Harleys don't really ride comfortably at speeds above 45 MPH anyway. :^)

  13. There's a bewolf cluster joke in here by tyrani · · Score: 1

    db....sound....lots of cars. Yah. There it is.

    --
    rejected (19) accepted (0)
    Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
  14. I listen to all music, but how come... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I listen to all kinds of music, since I have a teenager and have to keep up. I even like some Good Charlotte and Linkin Park songs (but Pink Floyd is the Best!)

    But why is it the Rap stations only have commecials for used car lots, and bail bondsmen?

    Off topic. Nevermind.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:I listen to all music, but how come... by Synithium · · Score: 1

      Targetted marketing through demographics.

      Yes, the truth really is unbearable and it stings like a son of a bitch.

    2. Re:I listen to all music, but how come... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I prefer the term "smarts", however. It is wonderfully ambiguous. A stinging pain and above average intelligence, all at once. :-)

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  15. Noice cancellation by Synithium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How close are we to getting a cheap, easily deployable, noice cancellation system? Living in a city is great because my job is only a mile away and i can walk, but the "ghetto" blasting is getting extremely old. I mean, even through triple paned windows and extra sound insulation in the walls i can still here 50 cent in the middle of the night...*sigh*

    1. Re:Noice cancellation by McAddress · · Score: 4, Funny

      You have to coat your apartment in ceiling tiles. Never mind that you won't be able to see out your windows, and that it will probably get pretty hot in there. But hey, there are tradeoffs in life.

    2. Re:Noice cancellation by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Funny
      I mean, even through triple paned windows and extra sound insulation in the walls i can still here 50 cent in the middle of the night...

      Whup! Expect the RIAA to show up on your doorstep soon looking for a royalties cheque.

      YLFI

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    3. Re:Noice cancellation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sniper rifle with a silencer.

    4. Re:Noice cancellation by refactored · · Score: 1
      This _is_ noise cancellation.

      Drive around in one of those things for a day and everything is just _so_ quiet.

      No need for hush boxes, melamine roofing tiles, low speed fans. Just peace, glorious deafness.

  16. Sympathetic vibration is fun. by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've always wanted to see if one of those boomboxes on wheels would shake itself to bits if it were to play the right frequency of infrasound.

    1. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by n76lima · · Score: 1

      Howabout that scene in DC Cab where they crank up the sound system in the cab and BLOW ALL THE WINDOWS OUT?

    2. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not in the same league of course, but you might be amused...

      I used to work retail, and with our surround sound system display, I had 2 400W subs running... on top of the particleboard shelving that effectively formed a HUGE reverb chamber... I'd crank up 'enter sandman' and watch 'em walk (and eventually fall of the display).

      I had to stop cuz the neighboring store kept bitching that I was knocking merchandise off the shelf..

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by euxneks · · Score: 1

      There are still people who like Metallica after what they did?

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    4. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Metallica might sound loud and powerful, but metal just doesn't carry as well as other forms of music. Leftfield played a small indoor concert at the university I went to... they got complaints about the noise over a mile a way. Deep electronic just seems to cut through things more.

    5. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how things are set up. The Masquerade in Atlanta has a dance club downstairs underneath the stage/bar area where concerts happen. I was there for an Alkaline Trio show a little more than a month ago, and it would literally shake the floor, but you could only barely hear it... between songs. I think electronic just carries further because the bass literally shakes everything, not because it's any louder than any other kind of music.

    6. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, oddly enough, but Metallica held onto some of their fans---the ones with integrity!

    7. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      That's true - deep base (low frequency sounds) travel farther and penetrate materials better than higher frequencies, which tend to bounce off materials and disperse. Low frequencies also require more power to generate, and thus carry more energy.

      --
      Jeremy
    8. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      If by "what they did" you mean St. Anger, the answer should be "NO".

      <simpsons>Worst album ever.</simpsons>

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    9. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by iainl · · Score: 1

      As the other poster kind of implied, this isn't really the genre of music so much as the fact that you can get a synth to create you a much lower frequency at a much higher volume than a basic Fender Jazz will give off.

      Leftfield are great for that sort of thing, though - Phat Planet (theme to the greatest advert of all time, for those that don't remember their Leftfield tracks) is right up there with LFO's LFO for insane bass quantities.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    10. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by Malc · · Score: 1

      "As the other poster kind of implied, this isn't really the genre of music so much as the fact that you can get a synth to create [...] "

      I think you contradicted yourself there... most of the popular metal bands wouldn't go near a synth. ;) Even some of the Norwegian black metal I used to listen with the occasional synth wouldn't produce bass beats in the same way.

      I was seriously in to metal in the early nineties (Pantera and Sepultura were on the pop side of my tastes). We used to try and compete with the Kevs and their techno. Looking back now, it all seems a bit silly. Metal music played loudly on most people's equipment ends up sounding like an undistinguishable wall of white noise when placed next to electronic music. (Of course, we knew they would only pick a fight with us if we were on our own and there were four of them in the car, so we won in the long run ;))

      I remember one of my flat mates at university. His music coming through the floor used to disturb me. I would go down to his room to complain about the bass, but when I got there I could hardly hear the music it was on so quietly and would want to ask him to turn it up! Very impressive little JBL bookshelf speaker. I think he used to work to the likes of Orbital in those days.

    11. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Leftfield also managed to get themselves barred from the Brixton Academy for knocking the plaster off the walls with their sound system. It's not exactly an off-the-shelf job.

      Mind you, compared to Dillinja's Valve system, it's like an old hand-powered gramophone...

    12. Re:Sympathetic vibration is fun. by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Of course. Not being a thief, I don't have any problem with what they did.

      Seriously, it's time to get over the 14 year old mentality folks.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  17. Interesting... but pointless by fname · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read this article earlier today, and it just struck me as pointless. I guess there are other competitions which are even more contrived, and maybe I just don't "get it." I suppose anything that keeps the youngins off the street and out of trouble is good.

    But honestly, how can it be a car stereo system when the car can't even move by itself! And given that you can't even listen to these things without: a) killing yourself, b) going deaf, c) being real far away, d) turning the volume way down or e) insulating it to lessen the sound; it just doesn't jibe.

    I guess it's the thrill of competition, but there have gotta be more intersting engineering challenges than this.

    1. Re:Interesting... but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I read this article earlier today, and it just struck me as pointless. I guess there are other competitions which are even more contrived, and maybe I just don't "get it."
      First post!


      You can't easily go deaf from loud bass. Most noise-related deafness is from high frequencies. Although at 177dB I am sure anything is possible.

    2. Re:Interesting... but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah this has got to be the most retarded thing i've read of this year. Pile so much shit into a car you can't even drive it, it won't play music on a single tone, which if you heard directly it would instantly ruin your hearing, and they can only play for 5 seconds before the speakers destroy themselves... All for the price of $80k usd.

      These people would have to qualify as the biggest morons i've ever read about.

    3. Re:Interesting... but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Agree completely. At first I read this:
      Many of the cars that performed at a dB drag racing event I attended in Toronto were sad-looking beaters
      as referring to the people involved. This is cultural emptiness at its best. Emptiness?: Items with value are put together in such a way that their value is nullified (a vehicle that can't be driven, audio equipment that can't play music). And this has no 'conceptual art' angle or creative edge that makes many of the 'Toys' stories on Slashdot neat. In comparison, this makes surfing porn or posting dismissive comments about other people's pursuits seem like constructive hobbies.
    4. Re:Interesting... but pointless by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      Like Evel Knievel (remember him?) jumping the Grand Canyon with a rocket assisted bike. At what point does the bike stop being a bike, and being more like a rocket?

      And if its a rocket, all he could do is jump the Grand Canyon? Go into orbit, and I'll be impressed.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    5. Re:Interesting... but pointless by minion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But honestly, how can it be a car stereo system when the car can't even move by itself! And given that you can't even listen to these things without: a) killing yourself, b) going deaf, c) being real far away, d) turning the volume way down or e) insulating it to lessen the sound; it just doesn't jibe.

      One of my friends was into this scene about 10 years ago. The stereo in his car was just like you said: Too loud to be in, too loud to be near, and you dare not even run it with the windows closed, or you'll blow them out. He was able to make a 2 liter of pop jump straight up and down on his roof with the windows cracked when he'd blast it. Pointless, but for some reason he thought it was cool.

      BTW: The chicks thought it was cool too. Its not too often you see a chick drooling over you for your 20% overclocked Athlon that runs stable and cooks eggs because its so hot.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
  18. Most worthless topic to date on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
    Is the benchmark for posting a story on this site becoming "any subject that is really stupid or quirky and has something/anything to do with tech is good enough!"?


    How lame can you get.

  19. More targets.... by PaulK · · Score: 4, Funny

    For my modified radar gun.

    It's amazing how many speakers blow when mosfets overload. Quality sound. :)

    1. Re:More targets.... by Synithium · · Score: 2

      I always wondered if a device could be made that would use highly concentrated directional ultrasonic sound. Point it at something and shake it apart with sound.

      Would be a great way to get back at those morons who sit outside your house in the middle of the night with their 'Mega Bass 8' CD playing...

    2. Re:More targets.... by PaulK · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I'm not mistaken, the US Army has developed a method of using sound for crowd control.

      I really don't care to think of what would happen if a persons resonant frequency was "accidentally" broadcast.

      As for the radar, back when I was in the navy, we used to light up our master chief's vw bug as it came down the road.... sputter...sputter...sputter...

      I'm grateful that we had a rather limited radar capability, (ssbn), so as to not actually HURT the man.

    3. Re:More targets.... by Pravada · · Score: 3, Funny

      I remember reading in Car and Driver once that the fighter jockeys out in Colorado would seek out cars likely to have radar detectors and light them up with their ground-acquisition radar.

      You can imagine what happens to a Valentine One when it's being painted by an F-16...

      --
      --- On the other hand, you have five fingers.
    4. Re:More targets.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can confirm, from second hand reports, of a life-long friend (second brother more or less) that flies a helicopter named after an type of indian and a bow, in the U.S. Army, that radar detectors do light up when painted. They were wondering if it would be a nice cockpit enhancement since some pilots are rather unhappy with some of the equipment that comes stock. Seems many police helicopters have better equipment (newer and higher tech), in some specific categories, than our countries best.

      At any rate, it was agreed by all the pilots that were there for the "informal test" that an off the shelf radar detector may not be such a bad idea after all.

      Sad, but true.

    5. Re:More targets.... by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if this is what you are talking about, but one method of crowd control is to play a tone that matches the natural frequency of the human bowels(about 6Hz or something low like that). Your bowels start to resonate and you lose all control. I don't know if this has ever been used but it's a cool idea.

    6. Re:More targets.... by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      BPS-15?

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    7. Re:More targets.... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Funny
      Your bowels start to resonate and you lose all control.

      The technical term is "the brown noise". :-)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    8. Re:More targets.... by Jerf · · Score: 5, Informative

      The sound control works on a mixture of sheer volume and psychological effects; strictly speaking it's not a directly physical effect.

      I really don't care to think of what would happen if a persons resonant frequency was "accidentally" broadcast.

      Only in Star Trek does everything have a resonant frequency. "People" do not have resonant frequencies; we are too soft and too squishy. In order to have a resonant frequency there must be some kind of resonance, which arises because the waves (whatever they are) are sharply and cleanly reflected, and can reinforce each other. When they are mushed up, they cease to resonate and you get more normal, mundane effects.

      Certain parts of the body, mostly bone, can have a resonant frequency, but everybody's will be different. In fact, if you try, you can probably locate your jawbone's resonant frequency. Every once in a long while (on the order of once every couple of years), something will manage to hit one of my bone's resonant frequencies loud enough to be very unpleasent, generally construction equipment. Even so, my bones didn't crumble for various reasons, including the fact that even bones don't have very good resonant frequencies, and it's embedded in a soft goo.

      So you can't simply broadcast some magical noise and watch the crowd dissolve. Of course you could kill them with pure power; an explosion's concussion can do that. But that isn't really "sound" in the traditional sense (no real periodicity, just one burst, maybe two or three significant oscillations (for nuclear-sized blasts), and that's it; the essense of "sound" is the wave nature).

      Star Trek really promotes some bad science here; really strong resonance, strong enough to hurt things, is not an every-day, everywhere-you-look phenomenon. Simple observation will confirm this fact; despite the wide variety of noise in the modern world, things conspicuously fail to blow themselves to smithereens because something was hit by its resonant frequency. It's the exception rather then the rule. You need a very regular structure that's also very hard, which doesn't happen much in nature. The reason we see any significant effects at all arises from our tendency to build regular and hard structures, like Tacoma Narrows or your shower (a rectangle box lines with tiles? Show me something like that in nature!).

      A similar answer to this message's grandparent: You can pulverize some things with sound, but mostly just hard things. The technology is pretty simple and if it's easy or useful, it's already being used in industry somewhere for something. You don't sound used as a pulverizing weapon because it's useless for that purpose. Generally, if you're trying to pulverize something it's easier to just hit it (not being sarcastic), but I've seen some exceptions (and even that is just "loosening" things with sound, it's sound plus "conventional" pressure and some rotation that all comes together to do the drilling).

    9. Re:More targets.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "You can imagine what happens to a Valentine One when it's being painted by an F-16..."

      I would imagine all the lights go red and it beeps.

      Unless they got new radar dectors that go:
      "HOLY SHIT, YOU'VE BEEN AQUIRED BY AN F16...it was nice knowing you"

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:More targets.... by PaulK · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying, in effect, is that I should leave the viagra at home when I go to one of these DB dragraces?

      back to business:

      I was actually considering what this man had accomplished, through a combination of sound and magnetism.

      I suppose that I was considering mass, not density.

      Thanks for the heads up!

    11. Re:More targets.... by atomicdragon · · Score: 1

      I would think the human body would still have a few frequencies that are dangerous. You would not explode or turn into goo, but would still die from long exposures to the right frequency. The best example I heard was of a factory that was built near a chicken farm. It produced some loud low frequency noise that seemed to kill the chickens after a while. The source is a questionable though (if you want to see the source, look at the sample code of "sound" in the Turbo C++ v3.0 help file).

    12. Re:More targets.... by sowellfan · · Score: 1

      Now, if only you could swap out the sound source that the dB dragsters are using, substituting the "brown noise" instead of their 74 Hz. That would be a better form of justice than the pie eating contest from 'Stand By Me'.

    13. Re:More targets.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The resonant frequency of the human bowels is 18Hz. You need good bass response to produce this.
      However, as it is just off the scale of what the average ear can hear, not much equipment does a good job of producing 18Hz tones.

    14. Re:More targets.... by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      Some larger pipe organs can get down to 12Hz or so, though.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    15. Re:More targets.... by cenobita · · Score: 1

      You may not be able to use sound very effectively as a pulverizing weapon, at least not in the sense that the parent post has mentioned..but, it is quite possible to cause physical discomfort, as you've noted.

      Generally, I experience this more frequently when hearing things with a very low frequency response being played at a very high volume. There's a power electronics act from Italy called CazzoDio that put out a cd called "Il Tempo Della Locusta" a few years ago..the first time I listened to it, I turned the volume up pretty high. Within mere minutes, I could actually feel my stomach churning as a result of the low-end frequencies. I had a similar reaction when listening to Brighter Death Now at high volumes. On the flipside, British act Whitehouse has been known to have a more grating/piercing effect on the brain, as their sound is almost entirely based upon utilizing white noise and idiosynchratic screaming.

      Regardless of our various tastes, it's definitely an interesting form for music to take.

      More to the point, though, imagine this kind of sound being generated at even lower frequencies, and within an environment that doesn't have the restrictions on sound that my apartment does. I'd imagine that at just the right frequency, this could be utilized as weapon of sorts. On one of the mailing lists i'm on, I seem to recall us having a discussion a couple years ago about a particular frequency (-45dB maybe? bleh, I don't recall) being noted as literally "shit-inducing".

      I'm sure we can all draw a nice mental image from that one..point is, if we can induce someone to take a spontaneous dump in their pants using nothing but sound, I don't see it as all that science-fiction to consider that we could kill a person with it or destroy a building. The trick, I think, would be focusing that sound so that it wouldn't extend beyond the object targeted.

    16. Re:More targets.... by dlawson · · Score: 1

      IIRC, in the 'sixties, he New York Police Department borrowed one of these massive (horn loaded) speakers to do some crowd control at a demonstration (commie hippie b*st*rds.) Unfortunately, as any one who has built a set of home built speakers knows, sounds with a wavelength longer than the circumference of the radiator are non-directional. I remeber the reports being something to the effect that the everybody evacuated (the area.)
      davel

      --
      dot-sig.
    17. Re:More targets.... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Now THAT would be sweet. "We've got tone! Dodge left! Dodge left!"

      Announcing the Valentine1 Mark 2: Now with chaff pods!

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    18. Re:More targets.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Throbbing Gristle was rumored to have used just such subsonic techniques at a few of their shows. Now that is crowd-hostile music.

    19. Re:More targets.... by nacturation · · Score: 1
      Your bowels start to resonate and you lose all control.

      The technical term is "the brown noise". :-)

      I think what you meant was brownian motion.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    20. Re:More targets.... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1

      You think wrong. If you didn't see the Southpark episode, you won't get it.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  20. Show of hands... by goliard · · Score: 5, Funny


    Who all looked at the subject and thought, "Gee, I wonder how postgresql does against Oracle?"

    OK, and who all thought, "How do you get a db into a dress??"

    --
    -*- Any technology indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced -*-
    1. Re:Show of hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA ha.

      I thought: "Why did Debbie drag a raisin?"

    2. Re:Show of hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the better question to ask is, who did NOT think this story had to do with databases?

    3. Re:Show of hands... by adamfranco · · Score: 1

      What was really getting me when I read headline is "How do you supe up your database?".

      My development group is setting up to do some load testing on several DBs right now. The contestants are MySQL, Oracle, and Postgresql. I think we're going to run them all stock though. :P

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    4. Re:Show of hands... by Unreal+One · · Score: 1

      haha aye! ...at least to the prior. ...though the latter is quite funny too! hehe

    5. Re:Show of hands... by iainl · · Score: 1

      'What was really getting me when I read headline is "How do you supe up your database?".'

      Surely you've tuned a database for maximum throughput performance before? :-)

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  21. Misread headline by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    dB drag racing

    Boy, did I ever read that wrong:

    "Aaaaand they're off!! It's DB2 in the lead with Oracle11i gaining on its heels and SQL Server a few furlongs back..."`

    1. Re:Misread headline by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      See, I thought they were talking about loud "queens" running in heels.

    2. Re:Misread headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh no! MySQL got all tangled up in his dress and fell flat on his face!"

  22. gaaaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of it is unquantifiable physics. You're trying to get the wavelength so it matures right at the microphone.

    *shakes head* Imagine if somebody who had a CLUE entered these competitions.

    Hmm, if the goal is to vibrate the air at a certain frequency, why do they use electromagnetic speakers? You'd think something else would do a better job like a bunch of explosions in a row or something.

    Whatever. This "sport" is a bunch of BS if you ask me.

    1. Re:gaaaaa by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      Actually, I read an article about this in USA Today, and it explained some of the rules. Since dB is a measure of sound pressure, it is against the rules to set off explosives or air charges to "unfairly" raise the sound level.

    2. Re:gaaaaa by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

      You'd think something else would do a better job like a bunch of explosions in a row or something

      You mean something like this?.

    3. Re:gaaaaa by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

      Actually, people with clues *do* enter these competitions. I've been to one world final (as a team-affiliated tourist, really, but still. I was there for free, basically. While everyone else was keeping the cars running, I was in downtown Nashville, TN drinking and listening to better music than 50hz tones. :) ) There were at least 2 teams from technical/engineering schools there, and as I recall, they did pretty well, but lost out to the teams with money -- it really does come down to brute force, mostly. You pack the most batteries and the most amps and the most speakers into the smallest amount of space that you can, and seal it up *nice* and tight, and hope for the best.

      It's a lot of fun, though. A good excuse to spend late nights drinking in the garage and cutting apart a $20K or better van with a sawz-all.

      --

      Ed R.Zahurak

      You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  23. $80,000? by Anand_S · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dodge Caravan represent!

    1. Re:$80,000? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      130,000 Watts ~=300 Hp if converted efficently. Does that Caravan really have 300+ extra Horse Power to spare?

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:$80,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy stuck a mighty fuckton of batteries inside it specifically to power the amps and speakers, so my guess is yes.

    3. Re:$80,000? by csimicah · · Score: 1

      This is only tangentially related to your post, but a horsepower is about 750 watts, so at 100% efficiency we're talking about 173 hp.

  24. And then.. by nolife · · Score: 4, Funny

    After the SPL thing wears off for them, they move into the world of PC video cards and CPU coooling systems..

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  25. Sometimes it's not how loud it is... by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    Sure, you can torture folks with how loud a piece of music is played. However, as with most things, it's the content that annoys. For me, for example, a barely audible Michael Bolton would be enough to infuriate.

    OTOH, there's also music out there that does sound great...but loses its meaning when played too loudly.

    1. Re:Sometimes it's not how loud it is... by mtnharo · · Score: 1

      Same thing in my dorm. It's not about drowning out the godawful rap coming from next door, it's about finding the right "ammunition" to make them want to turn it off and leave.
      Tower of Power and P-Funk seemed to work pretty well this year.

  26. +1 Informative??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    did the SPL scene...

    ...his sky-hook wing and blasting ICP...

    ...a tiny 112DbI...

    a custom 7th order isobarik subwoofer box

    How is this informative? I can't understand half of what you're saying!

  27. Just what I need by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

    "Just too Fast , Just too Furious"

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  28. Wooo! hhgttg references! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just finished the hitchhikers series (and i liked mostly harmless).. now I can finally get all the references that get posted everywhere, yay!

  29. This shouldn't be aloud by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 0, Troll

    (no the subject isn't a spelling error -- it's a pun!).

    I have no idea why anyone would want to turn their vehicle into the equivalent of an acousticaly driven blender.

    "take one nerdy noise-fanatic with half a brain but a fully loaded credit card. Add a 5 GW audio system and mix well in the confined space of an autombile. Now pour the gelatinous mass this produces into molds and allow to set for 4 hours. Yes folks, you to can make your own geek mousse."

  30. the right music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the right music could work wonders at significantly lower volumes. Say, ferinstance,
    a good dose of "Madame Butterfly", or "Into the Woods" or a Sousa march, or... well, you get the idea

  31. The KLF and Sonic Weaponry... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Jimmy Cauty aka Rockman Rock of the techno act The KLF allegedly had an interesting mobile sound system, courtesy of the British Army. From the KLF FAQ:

    Q: What's Jimmy's sonic weapon?

    A: Jimmy purchased two Saracen armoured vehicles at a scrap yard for ukp 4,000 and found equipment in them which he thought could have been used for sonic warfare. He has tried to assemble the acoustic gun from information he found on the Internet. Installing huge amplifiers and special speakers to cope with the very low frequencies cost him tens of thousands of pounds.

    The 25,000-watt sonic gun can project sound for around 7 miles, and Jimmy annoyed his Devon neighbours by testing it on Midsummer's Day, 1996. Jimmy said: "I moved to Devon six months ago for a bit of a rest and this is a project I am taking an interest in. I do not see it as music or art." He said that he aimed the gun away from homes and it seemed to have no effect on sheep.

    The Melody Maker said: "He was testing his two Audio Weapon Systems in a field near his new home. 'He alerted people to the fact that he was doing this by setting off some military flares. Then he
    tested his Audio Weapons System for an hour for a very select group of scientists and friends. The Audio Weapons System is not designed to kill people." ... [Cauty] first tested it at a Wire gig on Hungerford Bridge in May. ...
    In January, Panasonic [ the "Finnish conceptual techno nutters"-NME] borrowed one of the Audio Weapons Systems for tests on how sonic waves affect the human body at Brick Lane in London. ... A fax from Mr. Smith, the Head Of Commercial Exploitation at Advanced Acoustic Armaments, was sent to The Maker. It read : "The test took place to establish the parameters of the new vehicle solo and in tandem with its sister model, SS 9000K+L. The test featured new software generated for our latest commercial client, EXP LTD, and is described by Mr. Cauty as featuring 'the ultimate battle between sound and commerce ending in the death of all musicians and their ascension to rock-n-roll heaven or hell as befits them.' Yesterday we received communication with ex-Government employees who, in the Sixties, worked on audio weapon development with an offer of help and some ex-classified equipment. We regret any such death or damage that has resulted from our tests, but there are casualties in every war. The Triple A Formation Attack Ensemble will perform 'Foghorns Of The Northern Hemisphere' as part of an educational programmed supporting our research shortly."

    Most of this is probably scam, but Cauty has recorded an album of sonic waves for Paul Smith's Blast First label under the name AAA. The album is in the hands of lawyers who are trying to clear some of the samples used on it, and has yet to be released (07/96). It appears to be a Cauty solo project.

    More recently, Jimmy teamed up with new Asian-techno group, Black Star Liner for a _happening_ in a field on Dartmoor. Jimmy chartered a 'chopper to take BSL and assorted journos out to Dartmoor, where he intended to remix the Halaal Rock track in his tank. Apparently, BSL bumped into Cauty on London's South Bank, while he was driving about in his tank, he got hold of their album, and said that he wanted to work with them. Anyway, the chopper was grounded by severe fog, so everyone was put on a convey of buses. All the journos were given _orange_ jackets to wear. They eventually arrived at a field full of military vehicles, and people in _yellow_ jackets, wearing goggles and ears protectors, doing some form of formation dancing. The journos were lead to the ir seats, and had large floodlights shone into their eyes, while the yellow jackets let of flares all around them.

    There were a load of goats skulls on sticks around the field, and a whole pile of fireworks let of towards the end of the mix, when Cauty was mixing in some Jimi Hendrix. However, this d

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:The KLF and Sonic Weaponry... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      I so miss the KLF.

  32. Misleading Headline.... by jrwilk01 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read the headline and think the article was going to be about benchmarking databases?

  33. Saw a show about this... by Andorion · · Score: 1

    I saw a show on this recently... pretty crazy stuff. Their equipment is set up to play ONE NOTE, one frequency, as loud as possible. Inside their cars during the competitions, there's a single microphone which picks up the dB level. The cars have panels that are literally clamped shut to keep from blowing apart, and they're all undrivable. The speakers are custom made, and blow out pretty often. If you were inside the car during a blast, you'd likely die - literally =)

    Ridiculous stuff =)

    ~Berj

    1. Re:Saw a show about this... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      I'm serious here, why would I die from the volume? If I wore earplugs with airport-tarmack-quality ear muffs, with a (Imagine a motorcycle helmet with an inch thick plexiglass view-area, the entire thing designed to muffle sound, with insulation that goes quite snugly up against the neck, and is cut in half. To wear it, the two halves are placed around the head and clamped together from the outside.), what would the sound do to my body? Would my brains still scramble? I know the military has a weapon, though its at lower frequencies than 74Hz designed to shake up peoples' guts.

    2. Re:Saw a show about this... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Well never friggin mind, all I had to do was read the next comment about the wired.com story to learn what would happen to me. I'd die. But tell me, is it all frequencies of sound that would kill me? Or only lower ones? Could I survive 150Db at 2000Hz? I'm guessing the lower frequencies shake the air in such a way it actually rips tissue apart. Do the higher frequencies do that too? Am I fundamentally not understanding that what Db's are? Is it a measure of energy and the frequency doesn't matter?

    3. Re:Saw a show about this... by Dr_Auknix · · Score: 1

      I had the chance to sit in a Phoenix Gold X-max demo car when those subs first came out...

      Not much needs to be said other than Both me and my friend experienced nausea for the rest of the evening...

    4. Re:Saw a show about this... by J-B0nd · · Score: 1

      Decibles are a measure of the perceived loudness of a sound. The way to convert from decibels to Watts/square meter is to use the following formula: dB = 10*log(Intensity/threshold of hearing) where the threshold of hearing is 1e-12 W/m^2 0 decibels is the threshold of hearing. 120 decibles is known as the threshold of pain. In short, decibels are the way of expressing the wide range of loudness that human hearing can pick up, while the intensity level (measured in W/m^2) is a measure of the amount of energy in the sound wave.

  34. Sound to Heat conversion by Synithium · · Score: 1

    How much sound do you need to boil water? Or perhaps turn yourself into ash when you turn the system on?

    130k watts, sheesh.

  35. Irony.... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice how the dB drag racing headline is right above the sound-dampening materials headline?

  36. Isn't stereo a misnomer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stereo requires two separately recorded channels. If it's just one 70hz tone reproduced via many speakers, it's still just "mono".

  37. Old news, but still fun by qengho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wired Magazine did an entertaining story about this a couple of years ago. My favorite part was the description of riding around West Palm Beach with one of the guys, setting off car alarms with sound pulses:

    Eager to crank up the system, he hands me a set of earplugs. "Let's hear some bump."

    I stick the plugs in, and he hits the burp button, a red switch on the center console. It's difficult to describe what happens next. The noise sounds like "BRRROONNNNKKKKK!" The vehicle vibrates like a jackhammer, but much lower and deeper. I feel air blowing the back of my hair, and my body starts to rise out of the seat. My pant legs are flapping. Everything in the car is rattling like crazy, and I realize my vision is blurred as my face pulls back taut against my skull. The only reaction left is to laugh out loud. I look over at Billy E gripping the steering wheel, squinting and grinning maniacally. He lets up on the button, and the chaos stops.

    "If you're drinking a Coke, your throat will shut." I'm amazed I can actually hear his voice. "It's like being underwater. Your ears don't ring; they're just muted. After a day, everything opens up again," he says.

  38. Wired Article by heli0 · · Score: 1

    Wired (and slashdot??) did a writeup on this a while back:

    Feel the Noise

    I guess 48,000 Watts just ain't what it used to be.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  39. Why use Amplifiers? by Richard_J_N · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Surely, if they're after max volume, then they don't care about distortion. I'd be tempted just to use solid state relays to drive the speakers with a square wave. That saves lots on cost/complexity/power-disspiation, leaving more for the speakers. (You could also modify the square wave using n batteries in parallel, switched in for slightly different fractions of the waveform - this would get more power into the fundamental frequency.)

    1. Re:Why use Amplifiers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get high power mosfets cheaper than most relays. (For better switching times.)

    2. Re:Why use Amplifiers? by mhesseltine · · Score: 2, Informative
      Surely, if they're after max volume, then they don't care about distortion. I'd be tempted just to use solid state relays to drive the speakers with a square wave. That saves lots on cost/complexity/power-disspiation, leaving more for the speakers. (You could also modify the square wave using n batteries in parallel, switched in for slightly different fractions of the waveform - this would get more power into the fundamental frequency.)

      In fact, that's exactly what many competitors do. They overload the input to the amplifier to produce square waves at the tuned frequency of the enclosure/vehicle.

      As for the battery thing, many multiple serial/parallel setups in use, along with external regulators, etc. to keep the voltage level up while banging.

      For those who have never seen it, The official dB drag website. Wayne Harris, they guy who started this, used to work for Rockford Fosgate.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    3. Re:Why use Amplifiers? by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with this is that a square wave has harmonic frequency content outside the response range of the driver. You'd get 50hz, 100hz, 150hz, and so on, and the first 10 harmonics are very significant- even more at these power levels.

      One thing you could do is have the relay drive a pi-L network with the drivers as the series-L's in the circuit. You could tune the caps so that the resonant frequency of the network falls at the natural frequency of the driver and to match the load impedance (short) to the amplifier output impedance. That would give you some serious current through the drivers.

    4. Re:Why use Amplifiers? by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      I probably wasn't quite clear - I was sugesting a much simpler circuit. Something like this:

      [ASCII-art -see below]

      Where:
      1)The relays are of course solid state for fast switching (although 74 Hz might just be possible with mechanical ones)

      2)The circuit is extended to have more batteries/relays in parallel

      3)The triggering of relays is set to be slightly out of phase, and with slightly different duty cycles. This uses a microcontroller to provide a "staircase wave".

      Taking account of the internal resistances and the circuit inductance, it should be possible to get a reasonable aproximate sine wave using a purely digital "amplifier". At least, one would get the right frequency, and get most of the power into the fundamental.

      The advantage is that the amplifier is much more efficient, cheap, and doesn't get very hot.

      --------

      Unfortunately, the broken slashdot lameness filter won't allow my circuit diagram. Here's a description:

      A car battery is connected in series with a relay.
      8 of these are duplicated in parallel.
      This is connected across the speaker.
      The relay coils (or mosfets) are driven by a microcontroller.

    5. Re:Why use Amplifiers? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I see what you're saying now. This is just a class D amplifier. Almost all AM broadcast stations use class-D amplifiers nowadays. Digital modulation isn't that difficult to do. A lowpass filter on the output will get rid of most of the spurious signals in the output. Not a bad idea, however, there's one issue that you might consider. Connecting two batteries in parallel across a load won't change the current that flows through the load. It will only change the current flowing out of each battery. Also, if your duty cycle's overlap, you'll have batteries probably of differing internal impedances and charge conditions in parallel, so you'll get a lot of battery to battery currents. Also, your switching mosfets will allow reverse current through the body substrate (oft referred to as the body diode of the fet) so you'll need another series diode to prevent reverse current. The power dissipated in this diode will probably make it explode :)

    6. Re:Why use Amplifiers? by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about the power mosfets, although not the charge state. The charge state will be nearly the same if you only run for a few seconds; also there's no reason to repeat exactly the same switching pattern every wave: eg (with just 2 batteries) one cycle might be
      00,01,11,01,...
      but a subsequent cycle might be:
      00,10,11,10,...
      thus evening things out.

      Also, the load is partly inductive, so helping the low-pass. Furthermore, the load resistance will not be much larger than the battery internal resistance, so adding extra batteries in parallel *will* increase the current that flows.

      It will all be terribly non-linear, but a bit of microprocessor control could optimise that quite well.

  40. Why is this /. worthy? by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously. What's interesting about a bigger, badder stereo? If someone submitted a story about their overpowered PC, it would get rejected. As it should be. Builing a big sound system into a caravan makes it through though.
    It's time for some perspective people. Next on /. the worlds biggest lasagna.

    --
    Two Rules For Success:
    1) Never tell people everything you know.
    1. Re:Why is this /. worthy? by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      Thats the whole point of Beowulf clusters!

  41. Only 16 volt batteries by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

    Pfft, just wait till the 42 volt batteries hit the scene, vive la revolution!

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
  42. must patent... by radoni · · Score: 1

    ...a way to get /. submission by means of automatically referencing popluar science magazine articles.

    editors? what's next? "what's new?"

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
  43. Great, but... by covertlaw · · Score: 2, Funny
    Can it blow women's clothes off like "The Italian Job"?

    Or more important, can the mighty Caravan run Linux?

    1. Re:Great, but... by overclocker89 · · Score: 1

      That would be awsome. You know we never saw the proof.

      --
      Visit my blog at www.thedailymac.com
    2. Re:Great, but... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Can it blow women's clothes off like "The Italian Job"?
      No, it makes all the clothing's molecules jump off two feet to the left simultaneously.
    3. Re:Great, but... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      That's a debasement of science, though in reality I'm just pissed off because I don't get invited to those sort of parties.

      Goblin

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
  44. Orion amp.. by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was looking around for equipment to do-it-myself install a good sound system in my vehicle. I haven't been into mobile audio (we called 'em car stereos in my day) over the past decade and, though aware of some pretty loud cars around town, had no idea what people were putting in them.

    Well. Seems in the absence of big v-8's tearing up the streets, it's sound competition which has taken the place of "who's got the biggest prick contest" I picked up, what I thought was a modest used Orion amplifier, only to find it's some kind of competition amp, capable of driving some serious bass. Maybe I'll get around to putting it into the car, but between 1 farad caps, heavy guage wiring, fibreglass panels and absurdly huge bass drivers, I've finally got a clear picture of what people are putting into these Civics.

    I'm just glad I survived my youth with most of my hearing still intact.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  45. Hitchhikers guide by MC68040 · · Score: 1

    Well they still got a bit to go until they got the Vogon-style PA system mentioned in the hitchikers guide to the galaxy. In short: it utillizes every single thing that could be used to make sound as a speaker for total PA perfection... Just to tell us we're about to be blow away because they're building a "freeway".

    +1 Offtopic

    1. Re:Hitchhikers guide by Malc · · Score: 1

      You make a Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy comment and you talk of the Vogons! What? Couldn't you slip something in about driving their cars in to the sun whilst listening to their music from the other side of a desert (visible only with hyperbinoptic glasses)?

    2. Re:Hitchhikers guide by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      You know what I love about Slashdot? You're always guaranteed to get at least three clever references to the Guide. Makes me feel warm inside, almost as if I'm family with people across the country whose only manifestation is a bunch of text on a screen ^_^

      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    3. Re:Hitchhikers guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "clever"

    4. Re:Hitchhikers guide by MC68040 · · Score: 1

      Across the country? Geez. World you mean.

  46. MPAA Reference, must be slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Valenti admits he's often asked why he pursues this hugely pointless hobby. "Yeah, it's weird. But there are people who have tens of thousands of dollars invested in stamp collections, for God's sake. That to me is weird."

    Ok, so it's not Jack Valenti, but who reads the articles anyways?

  47. Not so great. by Boo+Robin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've actually been to one of these dB drag races, and I must say, it was rather disappointing. I sat around for a few minutes, and all I got was low end bass. Barely audible, and extremely boring. Something I wouldn't purposely go watch again.

    -Boo

    --
    'Give me one more medicated peaceful moment'
  48. Why bother.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with an engine? With that sort of power, why not just point the speakers backwards - and off you go!

  49. Kill them all! by axxackall · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    They don't need any melamine. As I need a gun to shoot a driver of every car I hear music.

    I love music. But I hate to hear someone else's music. And also I hate whn my 6 month old baby is disturbed by the sound that outloud all other motor engines around. Even more, I hat to hear their music in my appartment at 7th floor.

    I think once the law doesn't protect me from those crazy guys, then I have to go crazy myself and kill them all. One by one. I am serious. Just where is my gun?

    --

    Less is more !
    1. Re:Kill them all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't need any melamine. As I need a gun to shoot a driver of every car I hear music.

      I love music. But I hate to hear someone else's music. And also I hate whn my 6 month old baby is disturbed by the sound that outloud all other motor engines around. Even more, I hat to hear their music in my appartment at 7th floor.


      Thats what happens when you live in the ghetto bro. You need to move!

    2. Re:Kill them all! by minion · · Score: 1

      Just where is my gun?

      eBAY!

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
  50. Band Names by Stonan · · Score: 1

    I always wanted someone to form a band called Disaster Area. Another good band name is from Red Dwarf: Colostomy Explosion.

    Ew.....

    --
    The GEEK shall inherit the earth...
  51. *gulp* by supersam · · Score: 1

    Do they hand out ear-trumpets to the spectators on their way out?!

  52. What?? What? by niko9 · · Score: 1

    What's that you say old chap? Say again?

    I SAY COME AGAIN???

  53. The punk, the geek and the irony by mnmn · · Score: 1

    So the punk kid is feeling good and cranks up more garbage on his civic with blue lights reflecting underneath. His bright yellow dash is blocked by his sunglasses. He pulls next to some geeky kid on a red light in a toyota corolla 1991 and tries to focus on the group of girls on the sidewalk.

    Then the unthinkable happens. The geeky kid in big round glasses looks at the punk kid, gives a quick smile full of contempt and turns away. The gauntlet has been thrown for the punk kid.

    So he rolls down all windows and cranks up the gangsta rap to illegal decibel levels hoping to inflict pain and torture on his contender. Suddenly all attention at the crossing is focused on the battle that enrages.

    The geeky kid gives another smile despite the pain threshold, and turns on his very own techno. And then, he turns it up. A few notches along, he opens the glove compartment and wears a defensive headset ready for the blastoff to space. He also rolls down all his windows to make sure they dont break, and pumps up the volume till a few windows in the surrounding buildings break. The punk screams in pain and runs the light, his tail between his legs.

    Next issue: The loud barney song as torture in Guantanamo Bay and Iraq in search of the ever-elusive WMDs

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  54. How to reach those numbers... by Ballresin · · Score: 1

    I happen to be privy to some Auto Sound information, and the numbers they have there are actually from the MTX competition systems. The way you make that much noise is 3 letter. RFL. MTX makes a subwoofer called the RFL that requires 1000W of power just to hit, and can handle 4000W of power peak.

    The decibel race is just starting, with new competitors and new ways to make more Watts for the buck. Pretty neat stuff.

    --
    I got nothin'.
  55. Gabriel on steroids? You want VOLUME by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    My idea is to set up enormous propane jet powered flaming tuned horns. With a music keyboard (at a descreet distance) then shake mountains from miles away. Forget about electronics. What you could do with huge steel horns driven by combustion would db speakers to pieces, and anyones ear drums within several hundred yards, might even do more than that.
    Just imagine Die Kunst der Fuge played with echo effects in the Rockie Mountains and audible for hundreds of miles. Eat music you thumping Honda junkies!

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    1. Re:Gabriel on steroids? You want VOLUME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is fucking awesome... especially for the bach ref.

    2. Re:Gabriel on steroids? You want VOLUME by ces · · Score: 1

      Survival Research Labs has made whistles out of old rocket motors and cast concrete.

      Not quite the same thing, but a similar idea.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  56. Oh the memories. by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    Oh the memories of making my friend puke durring late night system tuning sessions in my shop

    Was setting out a 50Hz tones at near full output and he spewed all over the floor of the shop.

    Who would have thought 6, 10" subs would have done so much?

    I love you JL Audio!

    1. Re:Oh the memories. by NevDull · · Score: 1

      Eww... freak.

  57. Hey PUNKS! I now have THREE HERF GUNS.... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thank you slashdot, for arming me to battle these little bastards.
    Build Your Own HERF Gun
    and
    HERF Gun: Make it in your basement

    These little assholes drive up and down my street day and night, cracking my skull with this shit.
    My eardrums are damaged, I have severe inner ear problems and the sound pressure levels these things produce cause me agonizing pain in my inner ears and that causes me intense migrane headaches.

    The cops will not do anything about this.
    This is an invasion of my privacy.
    In my house I have the right to peace and quiet.
    NO ONE has the right to intrude into my privacy by any means. These sound systems are invasive, obtrusive and dangerous.

    Because the police will not do anything about it, I will. There are some kids living across the street from me that park in the front of my house and turn that shit up LOUD. There is NO ESCAPE from it.

    Be it known, here and now, that I am taking the law into my own hands. I am waging war.
    I will lay the buttons down on the HERF GUNS and I will melt their shit. I hope they have to call a tow truck to haul off their trucks.
    I hope that I destroy everything electronic in their home, their cars, anything they are carrying, and if they get too close, I hope I cook their stupid freaking brains.

    Anyone that thinks this loud shit is "cute" or "cool" is a retard and should have the ever loving shit stomped out of them until they stop breathing.

    Thank you Slashdot for helping to arm me with a most excellent weapon for this new war..

    1. Re:Hey PUNKS! I now have THREE HERF GUNS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like you. Keep us posted.

    2. Re:Hey PUNKS! I now have THREE HERF GUNS.... by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      Heh. The cops in my neighborhood respond in about 5 minutes or so. I live near a school parking lot, and have had the pleasure of seeing some of these people taken away in cuffs and a flatbed tow truck picking up the car. Seems they like to drink underage while playing their punk music through my walls. Of course, it doesn't happen much any more, for some reason :).

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    3. Re:Hey PUNKS! I now have THREE HERF GUNS.... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You think I'm kidding??
      I'm dead serious.
      Here's two of the units in reserve.
      And notice, the cases left at the curb after I stripped two of the
      microwaves are in the foreground picture of the kids that I'm gonna HERF.

      And even better, a few days after I took those pictures, THOSE KIDS threw away
      a working microwave. I walk across the street after dark and grabbed it from the curb.
      It worked too. They just bought a newer model I guess but now I get to HERF them with their own microwave!!!!
      Bwhahahahaha!!

    4. Re:Hey PUNKS! I now have THREE HERF GUNS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be sure to post some after shots. Them scratching their heads & wailing will do.

      ps. so was I.

    5. Re:Hey PUNKS! I now have THREE HERF GUNS.... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. This will happen.
      They just put sugar in my sons gas tank.
      His car his bonkered out so he borrowed a car from his grandpa. Those punks across the street sugared *my dads* gas tank.
      My son called the cops on the punks for making noise. Well, my son was drive my dad's car today and it had bad problems. Grandpa goes to get him and the car and they found sugar in the tank.

      These punks really screwed up. I know they did it and now they will pay.. I'll have that bastard packing up and moving out before this year is over. There's other issues here too, much more serious, that will get him put in jail. But before he goes, I'm gonna HERF the ever loving shit out of him and his two dozen punk pals...

    6. Re:Hey PUNKS! I now have THREE HERF GUNS.... by DMDx86 · · Score: 1

      you should also look into litigation.. get a lawyer and find all the tort laws you can use against him and sue the shit out of those bastards. if they can't/wont pay, have their property seized.

      as far as your own property, mount some outside cameras (with sufficent night time lighting) and keep it all on tape for the cops

    7. Re:Hey PUNKS! I now have THREE HERF GUNS.... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Installing the first camera this weekend, it'll go to a vcr.

      Let the games begin...

  58. Good sponsor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would think that the makers of Viagra would do well sponsoring a limp-dick group of folks like these guys.

  59. I'm sure it's not as loud as... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it's not as loud as my G4 Macintosh!

  60. racism on slashdot? by darweidu · · Score: 0, Troll

    fight back against the punk kids blasting gangsta rap from their Honda Civics I'm surprised such blatant racism made it's way onto the front page :( What upsets me is that so many old people won't give the music a chance just because they don't like black people... Also, the quote seems to imply there's something bad about honda civics, when in fact they're good, cheap cars. Just because not everyone can afford the same expensive cars that you old people do, it doesn't mean that you should make fun of them. :(

    1. Re:racism on slashdot? by vegetablespork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What racism? Sounds to me like rascist would be inferring the race from the type of music.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    2. Re:racism on slashdot? by Wingnut64 · · Score: 1

      My (former) HS was 99.9999% white, and we had quite a few Honda Civics with heavy bass and tinted windows. The fact that you feel you can determine someone's race based on what they listen to and drive is absurd. In fact, you are the first person in this discussion to bring up the issue of race.

      Bah, now I've gone and wasted time repling to a troll...

      --
      echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
    3. Re:racism on slashdot? by cenobita · · Score: 1

      As opposed to wasting your time replying to a pasty-faced nerd? :p

    4. Re:racism on slashdot? by Wingnut64 · · Score: 1

      At least their comments make sense...

      --
      echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
  61. Worlds Most Famous db Head? by Whitecloud · · Score: 1

    dont these guys annoy the hell out of you? dont the realise muffled bass outside the car sounds terrible as the car panels viberate, making them seem like idiots?

    over here in New Zealand our ex All Black rugby star Jonah Lomu is a huge fan and enters his car into the yearly competitions, he has clocked up 160db, so he must be the worlds most famous db drag racer! Go Jonah - get well soon -although somehow i doubt you read slashdot~ ;0

    --

    Do you need a website upgrade?

  62. old popular science by brane_sail · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or are they just posting articles from a 2 week old issue of popular science?

    --
    what is this for? oh well :)
  63. You do realize... by Cptn_Zippy · · Score: 1

    This is the second story that came from Popular Science's website...The story about the UL guy is on the same page.

  64. What was that you said? by hashish · · Score: 0

    huh, I can't hear you?

  65. I want to destroy these shitty car stereos... by SysKoll · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...and fortunately, I am not the only one to think that a car stereo you can hear from within your home should be destroyed with extreme prejudice (preferable with the pricky driver).

    That's where David Shriner's Klingon zapper comes in. Wait until a traffic light, point and zap, I mean *ZZZZAPP*, and enjoy the silence. Plus, it destroys the electronic ignition of the prick's car, allowing you to drive away without fearing a pursuit. Now if only RadioShack carried them...

    I am going to market them to retirees and quiet-loving coders under the brand Rap-B-Gone (TM). Any takers?

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:I want to destroy these shitty car stereos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go with shit-be-gone, not all rap is shit, and not all shit is rap

    2. Re:I want to destroy these shitty car stereos... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I want one.

      Although I don't mind loud music in its place, its place isn't in the car next to me, especially if it's shitty music (ie, rap, "R&B", heavy metal, etc). Blues is OK, as is Oz pub rock.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    3. Re:I want to destroy these shitty car stereos... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1


      Wait until a traffic light, point and zap, I mean *ZZZZAPP*, and enjoy the silence.


      That was freaky, just as I started to read the comment Depeche Mode's Enjoy the Silence started playing.

      Goblin

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    4. Re:I want to destroy these shitty car stereos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH, Rap-B-Gone sounds like a great name for a band...

  66. At 177dB by stox · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If you were actually sitting in this car, wouldn't your brains be converted to a slurry? What's the point? Or is that the real explanation?

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  67. A discrepancy? by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article: "every 10 dB increase equivalent to a doubling of perceived sound."

    In high school physics, I was taught that an increase of 3dB doubles the intensity/amplitude of the sound. My teacher concluded that +3dB would mean you hear a sound twice as loud. Then he went on to explain that P (power) is directly proportional to 1/d (the inverse of the distance squared).

    I know that the Richter scale works on the idea that an earthquake of 6 on the Richter scale is double the strength of one of 5 on the Richter scale.

    But have I been mislead? Is "perceived sound" different from amplitude/intensity? Did I really get staight 'A's in pyhsics?

    Mike

    Tux, myself and my lady regularly engage in 3somes - over the home network.

    1. Re:A discrepancy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In high school physics, I was taught that an increase of 3dB doubles the intensity/amplitude of the sound. My teacher concluded that +3dB would mean you hear a sound twice as loud. Then he went on to explain that P (power) is directly proportional to 1/d (the inverse of the distance squared).

      There are 2 things here, how does the dB scale relate to a linear scale (this is very simple), and how does the human ear perceive sound intensity?

      In photography (which I'm much more familiar with), a common reference material is an 18% grey card, because it is perceived as a mid-grey value by the eye.

    2. Re:A discrepancy? by J-B0nd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Decibles are a measure of the perceived loudness of a sound. The way to convert from decibels to Watts/square meter is to use the following formula: dB = 10*log(Intensity/threshold of hearing) where the threshold of hearing is 1e-12 W/m^2 0 decibels is the threshold of hearing. 120 decibles is known as the threshold of pain. In short, decibels are the way of expressing the wide range of loudness that human hearing can pick up, while the intensity level (measured in W/m^2) is a measure of the amount of energy in the sound wave. And yes, for an increase of 10 decibels (or every bell), the intensity doubles.

    3. Re:A discrepancy? by melted · · Score: 4, Informative

      You've misunderstood your teacher. Doubling the output power will make an amplifier 3dB louder. In order to make it twice as loud you have to increase the power by the factor of 10.

    4. Re:A discrepancy? by asynchronous13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not a discrepancy, but perhaps a slight mix-up.

      The article is correct: a 10dB increase is equivalent to doubling the perceived sound volume.

      The thing you are probably remembering is that you must double the input power to achieve a 3dB increase.

    5. Re:A discrepancy? by Reverberant · · Score: 1

      You're talking about sound intensity (sound power through a unit area). When talking about sound, people usually refer to sound pressure. Sound pressure level (SPL) is 20*log10(pressure[Pascals]/20e-6[Pascals]).

      You can of course convert from sound intensity to sound pressure using the approriate formula for your geometry.

    6. Re:A discrepancy? by Repton · · Score: 1

      One interesting thing about the deciBel is that it is a "dimensionless" unit. As a result of this, apparently engineers use deciBels for other purposes totally unrelated to sound, because they are a convienient way of converting to a logarithmic scale.
      (or something like that)

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    7. Re:A discrepancy? by Woodmeister · · Score: 1
      I think what they are refering to here has to do with how our hearing itself works on a logarithmic scale, so a ten-fold increase in the signal amplitude (+10dB) has the _effect_ of the doubling of the volume. A doubling of the signal amplitude (+3dB) is perceived as a "bit louder, but not much" even though the increase in power is quadrupled.

      Note that for these numbers I've assumed the equation dB=10 x log(I/Io). If memory serves me right, SPL uses the function dB=20 x log(I/Io), therefore 3 dB up or down refer to a doubling (or halfing) of the _power_ rather than signal amplitude (ie. the voltage feeding the speakers).

      This concludes our physics lesson for the day ;)

      --

      Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
      -Possum Lodge Motto
  68. Alma Gates! by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

    Alma Gates! The Beast!

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  69. Now That I'm Deaf... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    I'll stare into my laser beam headlights

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
    1. Re:Now That I'm Deaf... by ces · · Score: 1

      Do not stare into laser with remaining good eye.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  70. oh,yeah, you want loud, but musical? by dbrower · · Score: 1
    --
    "It if was easy to do, we'd find someone cheaper than you to do it."
  71. obligatory Spinal Tap reference by rifftide · · Score: 2, Funny

    The breakthrough came when they found a way to crank the volume dial up to 11...

  72. we'll show them a thing or two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "speaker voice coil temperatures spike almost instantly, going as high as 500F, and the sound deteriorates."

    Looks like those boys need to:

    spend some time on the overclockers sites

    slip some liquid nitrogen out of the chem lab

    quench those coils

  73. I was thinking by geekoid · · Score: 1

    it was some sort of database contest, like seeing who can move throught a billion rows the fastest.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  74. I can beat that.... by earthforce_1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just need to detonate a 300 kilotonne hydrogen bomb in the back seat of my saturn. I guarantee that the noise generated in the subsequent 3 seconds will put them to shame. Ah well, I was going to junk the car soon anyway.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:I can beat that.... by robfoo · · Score: 1

      I remember a story of a guy (maybe in Australia?) who rewound the voice coil on a single woofer so that it blew itself apart.
      Apparently he turned up at a dB drag race event with his little old hatchback with one speaker in it, 2 seconds of silence was followed by one hell of a bang and he drives away with the trophy.
      Anyone else heard this story? It could be urban legend, but it sounds vaguely plausible (and funny)

  75. Just goes to show... by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    Techology - creating better assholes...

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  76. I love the punks who think they're not punks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fuckwit you are! Obviously there are bigger fuckwits around, as the article shows, but you... ...think your chinese-made "brand name" speakers are something special ...can't spell "convertible" ...can't spell "isobaric" ...don't know what "isobaric" means ...feel the need to make wannabes look sad

    lame and sad, "Lumpy". And your low slashdot ID just proves you've been hanging out in Mom's basement tinkering with your penis, your "convertible" and your computer (in that order) for a very long time.

    1. Re:I love the punks who think they're not punks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh. RF is American

  77. This van goes up to by Col+Bat+Guano · · Score: 1

    11!

  78. We like the cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cars that go 'BOOM'

  79. ANOTHER TURD LAYED FOR SLASHDOT WITH SINCERE HATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


  80. Try This "Punk Kid" by thelizman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that is, Alma Gates, sixty something year old owner of the infamous "Beast" and two time world champion. She's also a friend of mine, and an honored member of teamROCS.

    She ain't no punk either. One reason she got into car audio was to "get even", but then she found she loved the competition, the friendships, and the enthusiasm of thousands of young adults. That's when she formed Team Gates. She has been featured not only in Car Audio and Electronics, but has been featured in Wired (10/2000, pg 260), and named in nearly every major media outlet (Washington Post, Boston Globe, New York Times, MSNBC, TechTV). Hell, she's even been on ESPN2! Let's see Lawrence Lessig or Linus Torvalds get that kind of coverage!

  81. Actually what I would like to see by melted · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..is a directed active noise cancellation system targeted specifically at those civics. Imagine the situation. You're at the intersection waiting for for a red light. Now this punk comes by with loud throbbing thump coming out of the windows of his car. Your car starts shaking. You press the right button, and active noise suppressor (kinda like the one they use on F-117s) supresses this motherf@ker's subwoofer and makes his entire sound system sound like a tin can until he closes the windows. Now that would be cool.

    1. Re:Actually what I would like to see by s10god · · Score: 1

      Now how about a solution for the muffler that sounds like a box of pissed off bees? I meen REALY I do not care WHAT you put on that damn inline FOUR it will NOT sound like a HEMI!

  82. Sound as a brutal weapon by Mawen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The following article describes using sound as a lethal weapon in the form of an invention by Norris called "Hypersonic sound".

    (This has been discussed on slashdot before, twice.)

    Excerpt from the Los Angeles Times article: "It gives you the equivalent of an intense migraine headache," said Elwood G. Norris, the company's chairman and inventor of the device. "It's just totally disabling."

  83. No discrepancy by melted · · Score: 2, Informative

    3dB is the limit of relative sensitivity, that is, average person can only hear the difference between two sounds if the difference between their loudness is 3dB.

  84. Right on!! by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

    Is there anything to make that rasberry fart exhaust EVEN LOUDER too!!??

  85. Bah... by mlk · · Score: 1

    I read the title, and though of mobile DBs ('ttle computers on these(1), or even better these(2)), with the winner as the server that move the fastest, go the furthest while also (with the joys of wireless) crunch the most recorlds.

    What a letdown.

    (1) I want one
    (2) Gahhh, and one of these

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  86. It's funny. Laugh. by Goonie · · Score: 1
    1. It's a joke. Lighten up.
    2. Idiots that play their stereos so loud (in public, not in a competition like this) that the sound of Britney Spears meets somewhere in your cerebellum despite the fact you're not in the car are making public nuisances of themselves. Whilst I'm not in favour of randomly destroying their equipment, I don't have a problem with appropriate measures to deal with them.
    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  87. Aah Crap! by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    This aint news for Nerds!!
    db?? Damn! I was expecting a dragster race with different databases involved competing against each other to see who gets the results the fastest.
    What type of non-nerd, outdoor shit is this?

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  88. Finally, a stereo louder than my FX! by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

    Ever since I bought the first GeForce FX I could get my hands on, I've noticed how much better Quake is without any background noise. If only I could hear my headphones!

    Of course, it is going to be a tad difficult to get that Caravan in my office.

    Oh, excuse me, I have to go, I think I see my supervisor trying to using that bullhorn again ...

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  89. punk != gangsta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "punk" kids to not listen to "gangsta" rap. punk and gangsta are two different genres.

  90. We don't need all that junk... by xRelisH · · Score: 1

    ... because all you need is to go out and grab a couple GeForce FX 5800's.

  91. Hey! You said you'd tell .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .
    Hey! you promised you'd tell us how to fight back against the punk kids blasting gangsta rap from their Honda Civics! Just what does it take, short of a Mossberg, to get them to realize they're being assholes?
    .
    Go ahead and mod me down. I think 99% of Slashdot modders are assholes too!

  92. The answer to your question is. . . by alizard · · Score: 1
    No.

    Glad I could help.

  93. This is pollution by GerardM · · Score: 1

    Having people that think this kind of equipment is nice to have are
    * destroying their hearing (their problem)
    * major sound polluters (not only their problem)
    On the risk of being told I troll, people with sound systems that can be heard in a car next to you or on the sidewalk should be measured and if it exceeds the maximum sound levels for their motors they should have to give up their stereo.

    This may be contrary to US culture but this is a bit that we do not need.

    Freedom goes as far as where the freedom of others starts.

    1. Re:This is pollution by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A better solution:

      Invoke the DMCA. No, Seriously. Playing music that loud is obviously a circumvention measure that allows "theft" by people who would not have otherwise heard the song.

  94. Logarithmic scales by Scott+Carnahan · · Score: 1

    I know that the Richter scale works on the idea that an earthquake of 6 on the Richter scale is double the strength of one of 5 on the Richter scale.

    I am not a geologist, but the Richter scale seems to follow the relationship log_10(radiated energy in joules) = 4.4 + 1.5*(richter number), or approximately so (it is difficult to decipher the language in sites like this one). It's not clear what you mean by "strength" of an earthquake, but the above formula indicates that a magnitude 6 quake would release sqrt(1000), or about 31 times as much radiated energy as a magnitude 5 quake.

    Incidentally, 3dB is approximately a doubling of radiated power, and an increase of a factor of sqrt(2), or about 1.414 in amplitude. 10dB is a tenfold increase in radiated power. I'm not sure how the doubling of perceived intensity with each 10dB increase would be rigorously measured.

    --
    "Your notation sucks!" -- Serge Lang (1927-2005)
    1. Re:Logarithmic scales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm not sure how the doubling of perceived
      >intensity with each 10dB increase would be
      >rigorously measured.

      That's the whole point of perception, you can't measure it!

  95. Here's a drag race by xixax · · Score: 1
    Like that doesn't already occur.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  96. Star Trek, bad science? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Only to those who can't tell the different between "Trek" and reality. Although there are a couple of cool scientific theories that present in Star Trek... overdedicated fans tend to overlook the fact that it's a TV show.

    Usually if somebody starts talking about warp drives in relation to the resonent frequencies, it'll be a good tip-off.

  97. It's pretty entertaining... by NiTr|c · · Score: 1

    My friend and I competed actively in DBDrags, we also held our own, certified, events in the Colorado area. The team we competed with was team Atac (Authorized Team Audio Creations) which built a pretty cool little mascot car. I was a PowerWheels with 1 10inch subwoofer mounted in it. We used the actual car for the enclosure and pushed some pretty good numbers. High 170's IIRC. And these events aren't about blasting music either. There are special CDs with different hz ratings on them that you "burp" to get your SPL level. Burp, as in play the cd for 1-2 seconds, then cut it. That's all you should really play pure bass for unless you wish to hurt your equipment. I think our best car, besides the power wheels, did a 160 something. It was a 1970's VW Rabbit with the inside torn out, filled with MDF board along the walls of the car. Then filled with expanding insulation foam, and about 12 Optima Yellow Top, deep cycle, batteries. We ran 1/0awg wire through the whole car, and even added an ignition switch to the hood, as well as throttle control, so we didn't have to sit inside the car. This is quite an interesting, and addictive, hobby to take part it. It's a shame more peopld didn't show up to the events.

    --
    Try actually thinking for yourself. It's quite refreshing.
  98. What kind of microphone do the judges use? by solarrhino · · Score: 2

    If this is so hard on the speakers, how hard is it on the microphones? And how accurately can they measure such intense sound? I would think that the condition and placement of the microphone would swamp many other factors.

    --
    "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
  99. dB Drag Racing "the Quiet PC" by Make · · Score: 1

    that was the title of the previous article

    and now this one..

  100. hmmmm "the Quiet PC" by Make · · Score: 1

    I wonder what happened to the title I entered... only "the Quiet PC" should be title... mozilla bug? hrrm :(

  101. Re:It's funny. Laugh. by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

    It's a joke. Lighten up.

    I'd say you can get out of just about anything with this sort of mindless comment. Means you don't have to consider another's point of view, too.

    --
    "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
  102. Racing? by llebe · · Score: 1

    That's an insult. Unless it's a race to be deaf first?

    --
    Stock schmock, give me cash.
  103. 1000 dB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Thousands of dB?

    If you need to double the amp power per three dB, that would require an insane amount of energy.(You do the math :) Ofcourse they probably aren't using equipment intended for music playback, but still...

    I remember reading an article in some hifi magazine wih calculations of the energy and speaker requirements to produce 1000 dB, as far as I remember you'd need an energy source equivalent of more than a few stars the type of our sun. And a speaker membrane moving back and forth a distance equivalent of the size of our solar system.

    1. Re:1000 dB by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      I think you double power every 6db. I forget exactly why. It has something to do with the fact that power is proportional to the square of something or other.

      The amount of stuff I have forgotten in just 4 years after getting my BASc in Engineering is just staggering.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    2. Re:1000 dB by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bels are "units" on a base-10 logarithmic scale of electrical voltage or whatever the equivalent is in sound. A decibel is of course a tenth of a bel. So doubling power makes a difference of 10*log10(2) ~= 3 dB. Since power is proportional to the square of voltage, assuming constant resistance, doubling voltage makes a difference of 10*log10(2*2) ~= 6 dB.

    3. Re:1000 dB by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Units on a logarithmic scale of power, even.

  104. Cool by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    250 Db @ 13 Hz
    But I don't wanna clean it up

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  105. Talk about it! by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    Talk about compensation. Hell for that money I would buy a better car, or a computer system! Why in the hell do I need someone to hear me two miles away?

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  106. A question. by Leffe · · Score: 1

    Is it really true that the sound of a nuclear explosion will kill you(if you are not already dead, that is)?

    And if you can die from sound, what's the limit in dB? Maybe I should ask this on alt.suicide, but whatever :)

    1. Re:A question. by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      It is impossible to know, since the 9 million degree heat spreads at the speed of light, which obviously means that the sound lags behind. However, at 160 dB, sound will stop your heart and kill you. And we all know how much sound pressure a nuclear blast creates(WAAAYYY above 160 dB). So, If you do not get killed by the heat, the intense light, the radiation, look on the bright side, there's always sound.

    2. Re:A question. by Leffe · · Score: 1
      OK, thanks.
      Hmm... is that death instanteous? It seems like a really easy/good suicide method, a little expensive maybe. But...
      ...177dB...
      I don't think I want to join them :)
    3. Re:A question. by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      It crushes the heart, so I think it would be just as painful as a heart attack. So it is probably noit a good way to go.

  107. might be a bit hard though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ~192dB sinewave sound is where the air pressure goes from vacuum to twice the normal air pressure.
    If you wanna get louder than that, the wave gets distorted as it has to consist of something like 99% of vacuum and 1% of 100bar..

  108. $0.02 by octogen · · Score: 1

    Thanks god there is a difference between GOOD and LOUD sound (re)production:

    For $80.000,- you can buy this loudspeaker, whose sound quality is much more impressive than the loudness of any dB drag race car on this planet...

    1. Re:$0.02 by octogen · · Score: 1

      oops, this looks like an intranet URL.. sorry..

      here's the correct link:
      Martin Logan Statement E2

  109. Bah, bunch of lightweights... by Sdrawcab · · Score: 1

    The US Navy has sonar that can reach 235 dB. http://www.pbs.org/odyssey/voice/20020906_vfts_tra nscript.html

  110. Re:The REAL problem is... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    ...the car is, according to the article, "basically undrivable" at 10.000lbs, with hardly any room for the driver. You'd expect competing vehicles to be at least somewhat street legal.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  111. Re:The REAL problem is... by Bertie · · Score: 1

    Well, it's legal, like. But a car that weighs 10,000lbs isn't going to go anywhere fast, and it's hardly going to corner like a go-kart either. Plus you'd need a tanker following you around just to keep it in fuel. I think that's their point.

    Then again, some people seem to think that sort of thing's clever.

  112. Civics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the deal with everyone here always wanting to bash Civics? I think they are fun to drive, like gocarts :D but then again, I have only tried the VTI or something.

  113. Viz by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
    This page has some information on the British approach to loud stereos and custom cars.

    Note that the girls always walk off.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  114. This is too serious to get wrong. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can't easily go deaf from loud bass.

    Absolutely incorrect. Loud bass is, in fact, a sure-fire way of damaging your hearing. Read this information from an audiologist and come back when you finish.

    Most noise-related deafness is from high frequencies.

    Again, wrong. Hearing damage usually manifests itself as a degradation in the ability to hear high frequencies. But you are mistaking cause and effect. The hearing loss can be caused by excessive SPLs (sound pressure levels) at any audio, or even subsonic, frequency. If your hearing was damaged by 20hz bass at an excessive volume, the effect would probably be a loss of ability to hear high frequencies, but that does not mean that the high frequencies caused the hearing loss.

  115. And I hate your screaming baby... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    ...yeah...bet you didn't see that one coming, huh?

    --
    Blar.
  116. Even More Pointless Corrections by xsbellx · · Score: 1

    Evel never jumped the Grand Canyon. The jump to which you are refering was over the Snake River Canyon. His son, Robbie, jumped the Grand Canyon (well part of it) on a real motorcycle in the late 90's. Sorry I am not sure of the date.

    --
    If VISTA is the answer, you didn't understand the question
    1. Re:Even More Pointless Corrections by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      OK, never knew that... Point is, at risk of being way off topic (what was the topic? Oh yeah! Massively stupid car stereos...), at what point does a bike with rocket attached become a rocket with bike attached?

      Similarly, at what point does a car with massive stereo system attached become a massive stereo system with car attached?

      Is it half full or half empty? Like some coffee with your sugar? Which reminds me I need some coffee...

      Maybe this meandering comment should be dubbed Philosophy and the Art of Car Stereo Tweaking.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  117. enough to deafen you 10 times over by blueworm · · Score: 1

    120dB is enough to deafen you completely 10 times over in a span of 6 hours.

    177dB is so dangerous the lower frequencies may cause physical harm in certain situations, never mind taking your hearing away exponentially faster than 120dB audio!

    What kind of hearing protection to they use for these things? They must use something!

    1. Re:enough to deafen you 10 times over by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      Yea, they stand OUTSIDE the vehicle with everything shut tightly... that's their protection.

      But, I bet if a window blew out or something, it'd get loud in a hurry.

  118. Check out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I had problems with this in college as well. My next door neigbor partied seven days a week (she dropped out the next semester too) until 4-5am. I tried all sorts of things to deal with the problem from politely reminding her that since I was paying for my education and the dorm room, she might want to allow me to sleep occasionally so I could take advantage of this, talking to the RA, talking to the deans, I called the police a few times with noise complaints. I hate calling the police on people. I always feel evil to have to resort to that level of stuff. I slept in earplugs, put a piece of carpet over the wall we shared, tried to change my sleep schedule, etc. The last straw was during finals. I got home from studying for organic chemistry at 230am, and got in bed. She and her friends were running up and down the hallway screaming. literally screaming. To make a long story short, I finally got to sleep at around 6am. I slept through my alarm clock, and arrived a full hour and a half late to my 3 hour exam. If she had returned the next semester, I might have taken a baseball bat to her stereo and her friends. My school didn't have "quiet" floors or dorms

    Please understand that this situation wasn't normal. I had dealt with normal college noise my first year there with no problems.

  119. "ICP" and "112 dB" by yerricde · · Score: 1

    ICP is Insane Clown Posse, an idiotic rap group.

    "112Dbl" is a typo for "112 dB SPL", or 112 decibels sound pressure level. This means that the sound has 10^11.2 times as much power as the quietest detectable sound.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  120. Who makes custom stickers? by nacturation · · Score: 1
    I've always wanted to have some high-quality stickers made up for myself so that I could place them on all those wanna-be racers. It would be very slick looking, done up professionally, and would be about half the width of the windshield... for maximum visibility of course. The text would read:

    POWERED BY STICKERS

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  121. Re:This is actually a serious issue by symbolic · · Score: 1

    I live next to a major thoroughfare, and as soon as the start of the summer comes around, it's hell, as it's not uncommon to be assaulted 20-30 times a day by these drive-by tresspassers. These boomcar morons think they're bad-asses with their expensive toy stereos, but what they really need to do is grow the hell up and learn something about civility.

    I am thankful that our local police department takes the issue seriously- after some initial prodding, they've pretty much eliminated the problem. The boomers here might be pissed because of repeated (and increasingly expensive) fines, but they ought to be thankful that they aren't faced with a law like they have in Michigan, where the equipment must actually confiscated and destroyed.

    Those who are facing this problem might be interested in this Web Site. IT contains a lot of useful information about the problem, and interestingly, the boomers themselves.

  122. dbdr is passe, stupid. by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

    "A measured SPL in excess of 140 dB will result in immediate disqualification." http://www.termpro.com/dbdrag/rules/2002/rules02.h tml

    What a stupid "sport," if u can call it that. "Oooh, I can spend more money than anybody else and hire an EE to do a finite element analysis on my ricey car." Maybe mfgrs should preinstall "BQuiet" (dynomat clone) so u dont hear a car from the outside. The truth is that people don't want to hear your car, if you want to be deaf, it's your perogative. Besides, if you dynomat, you get a higher SPL. ;) My Olds Brougham gets hella SPL inside, and all you hear from the outside are faint thumps. It's these cheap-ass, plastic, asian, rice-burners that dont contain the sound that's the problem.

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  123. Fascinatingly stupid ... by Litterbox · · Score: 0

    Only in America could you do something this stupid and wasteful. They should hold the whole competition in a gas chamber so it can only happen once. No doubt these people will unfortunately breed and have kids just like them. Where's the reset button on this planet? We need a fresh start and flushed gene pool.

  124. Letdown by babbage · · Score: 1
    From the article blurb...
    For a paltry $80,000 outlay, you too can fight back against the punk kids blasting gangsta rap from their Honda Civics.

    For a minute there I thought this guy was offering to take out an eighty grand hit on the hot rod punks, and while murder is a bit extreme, I can see where people would sympathize with an idea like this.

    But no, he's suggesting that we might want to slink down into the gutter for them for that fair & reasonable price.

    Sorry, I think option A might be more popular with more readers... :-)

  125. Nice!!! by Redbw6 · · Score: 1

    I think that is so great. If I could afford $80,000 I would put that system in my old car and blare some oldies. That would be such a riot!!!

  126. re-db drag by crystal1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey all...

    I didnt have time to read every response to the entire post, but I thought I would come over to your board and speak a little on the subject.

    I agree that there are alot of punk kids out there that mis-represent what DB Drag is all about. And just like "hackers" give avid computer users a bad name - these punk kids or people without respect for others gives the DB Drag world a bad name.

    To begin - most truly serious DB Draggers dont drive thier cars around annoying people. Yes - there alot of "us" that cannot drive thier cars around at all... but it pretty much equates to a real drag racing car - those arent street legal either. Alot of our cars are so specialized that it would simply be impossible to safely operate the vehicle in the street.

    There is a world of diffrence between a DB Drag Racing competitor and a kid who has seen one too many movies about racing and hasnt developed a sense of respect for others. Myself for instance - I listen to my car system pretty loudly while on highways with the window down... but the second I come off the highway, enter a residential area, or come to a stoplight - not only do I turn it down, alot of the times it goes OFF altogether.

    Not many people will ever truly understand other peoples hobbies, and DB Drag racing is no diffrent. To some people it seems a horrible waste of money. To others it seems too easy to prove a challenge. To me it was easy to reach a certain level of performance in competition, but after that you have to start applying more than simple physics or adding more and more speakers to get louder. Eventually you hit a point where you get diminishing returns. There are alot of things that are not legal in competition (the afforementioned pressurized cabins for one :-) )and therefore we are forced to come up with a way around the restriction. To some of us its just as fun as figuring out how many gigahertz we can squeeze out of an overclocked CPU.

    The world of DB Draggers learns alot from reading feedback such as this. It is painful to think of someone defining your hobby as something used to annoy other people. But in reality it is only a small percentage of people that do such things. It makes about as much sense as racism. We all pretty much stick together in our sport, and save the bad apples - we all come out better for it.

    Before I take up entirely too much space here on your board (some of you may think that already) ill draw to a close.

    P.S. 10 Db IS in fact a "doubling in percieved sound level" to the human ear. When you mentioned 3db being a doubling - it IS... but it is a doubling of apparent signal level. To an electronic meter, a 3 Db gain reads as twice the signal, but is sometimes very hard to pick up with the human ear.

    By the way... if you want to see the Good (mixed in with the little bit of inevitable bad... you can find a forum of DB Draggers at http://www.termpro.com

    I only ask that you conduct yourselves as civilly as I have here.

  127. dB Drag Racing by crystal1 · · Score: 1

    Hey all... I didnt have time to read every response to the entire post, but I thought I would come over to your board and speak a little on the subject. I agree that there are alot of punk kids out there that mis-represent what DB Drag is all about. And just like "hackers" give avid computer users a bad name - these punk kids or people without respect for others gives the DB Drag world a bad name. To begin - most truly serious DB Draggers dont drive thier cars around annoying people. Yes - there alot of "us" that cannot drive thier cars around at all... but it pretty much equates to a real drag racing car - those arent street legal either. Alot of our cars are so specialized that it would simply be impossible to safely operate the vehicle in the street. There is a world of diffrence between a DB Drag Racing competitor and a kid who has seen one too many movies about racing and hasnt developed a sense of respect for others. Myself for instance - I listen to my car system pretty loudly while on highways with the window down... but the second I come off the highway, enter a residential area, or come to a stoplight - not only do I turn it down, alot of the times it goes OFF altogether. Not many people will ever truly understand other peoples hobbies, and DB Drag racing is no diffrent. To some people it seems a horrible waste of money. To others it seems too easy to prove a challenge. To me it was easy to reach a certain level of performance in competition, but after that you have to start applying more than simple physics or adding more and more speakers to get louder. Eventually you hit a point where you get diminishing returns. There are alot of things that are not legal in competition (the afforementioned pressurized cabins for one :-) )and therefore we are forced to come up with a way around the restriction. To some of us its just as fun as figuring out how many gigahertz we can squeeze out of an overclocked CPU. The world of DB Draggers learns alot from reading feedback such as this. It is painful to think of someone defining your hobby as something used to annoy other people. But in reality it is only a small percentage of people that do such things. It makes about as much sense as racism. We all pretty much stick together in our sport, and save the bad apples - we all come out better for it. Before I take up entirely too much space here on your board (some of you may think that already) ill draw to a close. P.S. 10 Db IS in fact a "doubling in percieved sound level" to the human ear. When you mentioned 3db being a doubling - it IS... but it is a doubling of apparent signal level. To an electronic meter, a 3 Db gain reads as twice the signal, but is sometimes very hard to pick up with the human ear. By the way... if you want to see the Good (mixed in with the little bit of inevitable bad... you can find a forum of DB Draggers at http://www.termpro.com I only ask that you conduct yourselves as civilly as I have here.