Slashdot Mirror


AOL Lays Off 450 In California

bmarklein writes "AOL has laid off 450 in California. The former Netscape campus is going from 675 employees to 300. The San Francisco office, which they obtained when they acquired Spinner (now Radio@AOL), and which housed Nullsoft after their acquisition by AOL, is being closed along with an office in San Diego. 100 employees have been offered jobs in Virginia or New York. No word on how this affects products like WinAmp. Justin, are you out there?"

389 comments

  1. Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That has to be a good .03% of their workforce.

    Slow day already?

    1. Re:Woah! by PipianJ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it's 2% of their workforce.

    2. Re:Woah! by kiwimate · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or, alternately, for those of us who actually RTFA, about 2% of their total workforce of 19,000.

      And, to answer the other desperate "please, dear God, let me get something vaguely approaching a first post" mathematically challenged posts -- it will be 375 positions eliminated at their Mountain View Campus, and a total of 450 in California. Yep, AOL is sufficiently large/bloated to have multiple locations in CA.

    3. Re:Woah! by fuzzix · · Score: 5, Funny

      "OMG d00d LOL!! ur fird!!!11"

      2% of their workforce got this over AIM...

    4. Re:Woah! by Lshmael · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep, AOL is sufficiently large/bloated to have multiple locations in CA.

      Of course, California is the biggest state. Now if they had multiple locations in, say, Rhode Island...

    5. Re:Woah! by Lshmael · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oops, I meant most populated! I know very well that California is the third biggest state (after Alaska and Texas). It's early.

    6. Re:Woah! by TheMidget · · Score: 0, Funny
      I know very well that California is the third biggest state (after Alaska and Texas).

      No fifth biggest state. You forgot Canada and Iraq...

    7. Re:Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2% of AOL's workforce but less than half a percent of Time Warners total workforce. Since the stock is of the parent company I don't think investors will even blink at this.

    8. Re:Woah! by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      I know of several companies that have several locationsin Rhode Island, as a matter of fact.

    9. Re:Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 2% of their workforce in total, but it's 7% of engineering.

    10. Re:Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      McDonalds, for example.

    11. Re:Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a retard.

      -above poster.

    12. Re:Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is it the *right* 2% of their workforce?

    13. Re:Woah! by BadCable · · Score: 1

      Actualy...

      Alaska is the largest state.

    14. Re:Woah! by Stackis · · Score: 1

      California may be the 3rd largest as far as population is concerned, but it IS the 5th largest economy in the WORLD!

      --

      "Look where we worship" -- Jim Morrison
    15. Re:Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwahaha, mod up

    16. Re:Woah! by cous_2000 · · Score: 1

      *to AOL big wigs* jo0 sux0r, n3wb!

      --
      Please send comments to Helen Wait
  2. surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hardly a surprise given their sudden lack of enthusiam for non-microsoft products, now they've kissed and made up with Redmond.

    Anyone would wonder if Winamp and Netscape were just tools to help them get their way.

    Go mozilla...

    1. Re:surprised? by rf0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well I wouldn't be surpised if winamp was sold to microsoft and they merged it into media player, or just killed it. As for Netscape commercially it might be dead however mozilla is still going strong

      Rus

    2. Re:surprised? by thales · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Anyone would wonder if Winamp and Netscape were just tools to help them get their way."

      To an extent they were always bargining chips, but the real change came when the TW people found out that they got screwed in the merger and won a sucessful fight to take control of the company including the former AOL holdings. The people who are now running the AOL holdings are from outside of the software industry, with no experiance of Microsoft's tactics. They just see it as a choice between an alliance with a company that controls 90% of the desktop computers or with a varity of companies that only control 10%. From that viewpoint going with Microsoft sounds like the smart thing to do.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    3. Re:surprised? by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      Agreed, especially now that iTunes is available on Windows. AOL need no longer spend money providing an alternative music player when Apple is doing a better job of it.

      Disclaimer: I realize that that Winamp can play things other than music, but does anyone realy use it for that? Aside from when one forgets to not let Winamp associate with *everything* during the install?

    4. Re:surprised? by zenoza · · Score: 1

      If you have ever worked with Microsoft or had to compete against them you would know also..... Microsoft does not inspire to see companies grow. Unless you do exactly what they want. If you change slightly off their idea for what YOU should be doing they (microsoft) will most likly become displeased and do what ever they can to make sure their goal will become a reality.

    5. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but the real change came when the TW people found out that they got screwed in the merger

      Why is it that every time someone uses a phrase similar to this one, they get modded up insightful? I am voiding my mod points right now to respond to this uninsightful BS.

      TW was not a clear 'victim' in the merger... So the stock fell... Is that AOL's fault? Everyone's stock has fallen since the late 90s. If you think that the entertainment industry wasn't hit, take a look at the following graphs:
      Disney
      Viacom

      So, just because the stock tumbles, it is AOL's fault? It looks to me that TW stock probably would have fallen just as well... Has anyone ever thought for just a second that maybe AOL was the victim? I mean, didn't TW accept the terms of the merger because they were in debt up to their neck? In fact IIUC, a great deal of AOLTW's current debt is left over from TW pre-merger. So the bubble burst before AOL could pay it down for them, does that make TW a victim (or a bunch of whiners)?

      I have a vested interest in TW, but I don't think AOL bashing does any good. It also seems like this is just another case of people letting the press think for them, and not doing any research on their own.

      One note I will make though, is that the AOL management was inexperienced compared to the TW management, and the company is in good hands now with the previous TW management in charge (Dick Parsons, et al.). But that doesn't mean it was a fight to push AOL mgmt out because AOL screwed TW, I think that the board just saw the value of TW mgmt experience and moved them up the ladder.

    6. Re:surprised? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Anyone would wonder if Winamp and Netscape were just tools to help them get their way.

      Why would they be anything but? If not just tools in some evil conspiracy to get what they want vis-a-vis Microsoft, then tools to get their way in the regular world. You know, that whole businesses-make-money thing.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    7. Re:surprised? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I realize that that Winamp can play things other than music, but does anyone realy use it for that?

      All I know is that when I double click almost any media type, WinAmp opens it. A lot of the ones it opens it doesn't play right; video but no sound, sound but no video- which doesn't make much since its using the same libraries.

      Aside from when one forgets to not let Winamp associate with *everything* during the install?

      Er. Nevermind. :)

      Yes, iTunes is quite a bit better than WinAmp, especially for me, as a person who totally hates maintaining playlists. The player should have a happy little browse feature like iTunes. Which WinAmp does now in newer versions- but it still isn't quite as nice.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    8. Re:surprised? by thales · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When that merger happened I was amazed that the TW management was willing to trade stock that represented the very real assets that TW held for overinflated dot.com shares that had a lot of hype and damn few real assets behind them.

      All stocks went down after the 90s buble burst in 2000, but if AOL had remained independant it would have sunk like a rock instead of dragging AOL/TW even lower than the general decline. You might also note that the bloodletting included dumping TW people that played key roles in that foolish merger.

      None of that affects the key part of my statement that the turn around in how AOL viewed Microsoft came After TW people stagged their revolt and took over management of the AOL holdings.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    9. Re:surprised? by zangdesign · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It wasn't just AOL's stock price that screwed TW, though. There were allegations of shaky accounting in both real dollars from advertising revenue and in customer accounting. These things were not apparent at the time of purchase.

      It's more a case of corporate culture clash than anything else. TW had no clue what they were getting into, and neither did AOL, I suspect. I tend to think of it more as an experiment gone horribly, horribly wrong than anything else.

      I have no vested interest in either one, except making sure that I never use an AOL disk again nor allow any of my friends to do so.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    10. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, it was about corporate culture clash, I just hate hearing that AOL screwed TW.

    11. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      damn few real assets behind them ?????

      You consider millions, I repeat, MILLIONS of customers damn few real assets?

      Everyone forgets that this is real revenue... AOL has more paying customers than any other ISP on the planet. Last time I checked in the U.S. AOL was kicking the crap out of everyone (broadband providers included). There will be a continuing migration to broadband, but this will take a while. People like to keep their email address, and the mass exodus to broadband is only happening at about a 5% subscriber loss per year. By my math, that means AOL will still have customers for over twenty years. That gives them some time to find a new niche, or a slow death. Neither one has them dying overnight.

      None of that affects the key part of my statement that the turn around in how AOL viewed Microsoft came After TW people stagged their revolt and took over management of the AOL holdings.

      This isn't necessarily true. I work here at AOL and I remember when we started using the Gecko engine in another re-branded version of the AOL client (CompuServe). I was disappointed that we stuck with IE in the AOL client. However, it was asked in an All-Hands why we were suddenly happy with Microsoft. The answer was never clear, but I do remember that this decision came shortly after M$ settled with AOL over an old Netscape lawsuit to the tune of 750 million dollars. Up to that point, I think Netscape and Mozilla were just bargaining chips and backup plans. The TW big-wigs don't run the day-to-day decisions on implementation of technology. In fact they really don't care how we do what we do, just that we get it done. Before the lawsuit was settled, M$ was a foe, afterwards, we wanted to be friends again, which makes sense. The AOL mgmt was smart enough to figure it out on their own.

    12. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and another thing. AOL's stock has tumbled drastically, there is no denying that. But, there are a few things to note here. If TW had stayed TW, they had an inflated market cap, and their stock would have probably dropped to half of what it was at it's peak. That was the general decline looking at Disney and Viacom. That is scenario one.

      I can't seem to find what TW traded at pre-merger, but I am sure it jumped when AOL mentioned buyout (that's what normally happens). But, after the merger, that stock is converted to AOL stock at what is thought a reasonable conversion rate. At this point in time, TW stakeholders have a choice, they can get out, or stay in. If they are getting out, they see things the way you do. Many people weren't trading heavily during the bubble because they hadn't forgotten the basic rules of accounting and investing, but these people were teased by other day traders at the time. Any-who, back to my point. The people who got out, would have fared the best of all my scenarios because they would have gotten a decent amount since the TW stock would have been inflated from both the bubble and the prospect of buyout.

      Another scenario (which is the scenario that people claim that TW got screwed), is that people kept the AOL stock and watched it tumble. Now, my point is that this can't be blamed on AOL. If AOL was the only inflated stock at the time, then I could see your point. However, everyone's stock was bogusly high, especially in the tech sector! I remember hearing terms like 'The New Economy.' If AOL is at fault for this tumble why aren't companies like Yahoo! and Ebay being bashed on a daily basis? You might mention the accounting problems for the lack of bashing. Well, the accounting problems have been tracked down to one person in a high enough position to affect the bottom line. And before anyone asks, rest assured, that person is gone and AOL is recovering from it. But, anyone expecting AOL to pull a WorldCom will be waiting a while. There are many reasons why AOL will continue to exist, look for another post further down on the board by me for some of those reasons.

    13. Re:surprised? by thales · · Score: 3, Informative

      "You consider millions, I repeat, MILLIONS of customers damn few real assets?"

      AOL dosen't OWN those people. A Subscriber list can't compare as an asset to TW's Copyrights to Time Magizine, to Warener studios, to Turner Broadcasting. There is no way in Hell that the AOL subscriber list was equal in value to the very real assets that TW held.

      AOL has always had an attrition problem, of people leaving because they didn't like the service. There are Millions of former AOL subscribers out there. They were able to paper over this retention problem during the big growth phase of the internet when they signed up new customers faster than they lost old ones, but that phase is over.

      AOL juggled the books during the merger to hide that a large part of thier claimed customer base were reciveing AOL for free, either thrugh the inital free offer or through extensions of free service that AOL sales reps gave when people called to cancel after the inital free offer expired. You could get AOL for free for several months just by calling to cancel and a lot of people knew it and took advantage of it by signing up for a new free account as soon as they couldn't get free extensions any more.

      You are assuming that the present decline in AOL subscribers will stay at a static 5%. It won't it will increase as low cost dial ups eat at the subscriber list from below, and the cost of Broad Band access falls and eats at the subscriber list from above.

      AOL also did some creative bookkeeping to make it look like ad revenues were higher than they actually were.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    14. Re:surprised? by Malcontent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "From that viewpoint going with Microsoft sounds like the smart thing to do. "

      An alliance with Microsoft always looks good on paper. It's probably pretty good financially too until the day MS stabs you in the back and takes off with you technology or customers.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    15. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you just spouting this stuff off? I mean, some of it makes sense, and I acknowledge it when it does, but *so* much of it doesn't.

      A Subscriber list can't compare as an asset to TW's Copyrights to Time Magizine, to Warener studios, to Turner Broadcasting.

      With the exception of Warner Bros. Studios, these companies are based on subscriber base. How can you sell ad space without a large subscriber base? The millions of people AOL reaches through it's service, and the billions it reaches through it's properties (AIM, etc.). Goes further than the subscriber base of Time. The content of these channels is not so valuable, if no one is buying the magazines or watching CNN, which seems to be the case lately at no fault of AOL...

      You are assuming that the present decline in AOL subscribers will stay at a static 5%. It won't it will increase as low cost dial ups eat at the subscriber list from below, and the cost of Broad Band access falls and eats at the subscriber list from above.

      You didn't hear about AOL undercutting these guys did you? AOL will be able to throw their marketing power at their own low-cost ISP, and stem the exodus before it gets out of control. United Online has a small customer base, only a fraction of the total dialup market, broadband is a much formidable foe, especially with SBC/Yahoo! offering broadband at a rate only a few dollars more than standard AOL. But, even if the customer dropoff doesn't stay static, do you really think that everyone will dump AOL all at once? Show me an example of this happening to any subscription based service. AOL has time to find a way to compete with Broadband. If they don't, they will die, there is no doubt about that. What I am saying is that there is time for them to find this competitive product. It ain't over till the fat lady sings ;).

      The doctoring of the books you talk about was only a small percentage of the customer base. We called those accounts 'bicyclers.' We eliminated the bicyclers in '02. And, it didn't affected the books so drastically as you seem to think.

      My point is that AOL has quite a bit of time before they close all the doors. And, my other point was that they didn't 'screw' TW in the merger, and if you still think they did, you have to admit, that it wasn't intentional.

    16. Re:surprised? by Compenguin · · Score: 1

      I use winamp to play NSV, there are alot of good NSV channels (AOL Music, NTV:WPA, etc.)

    17. Re:surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only person that had even the glimmer of a fantasy that AOL was taking over TimeWarner, was Steve Case. Besides you, of course.

    18. Re:surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Winamp is small and unobtrusive. I like it so I can double-click an mp3 and play it if I'm browsing through my hard drive.

      iTunes is more like a jukebox/library/music database than just an mp3 player. You can manually create playlists, like with winamp, or iTunes can create playlists based on queries. iTunes has the music browser built right in. Want to listen to all your country music? double-click the country genre. Want to listen to all music by one particular artist? or just a particular album? Easy as double-clicking. With Winamp, you'd need to use windows explorer to browse, or manually set up playlists.

      with iTunes, I find myself listening to a lot more music than I did with winamp or with CDs.

    19. Re:surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TimeWarner took a massive debt payoff and gained control of a significant stake in the internet, something none of the traditional media had at the time, and all wanted. They acquired the largest subscriber base of anything, anywhere, ever. All on the gamble that they would be able to regain control of their company after a few years of letting Case get his picture taken. Well, it worked, and I don't think anyone thought it wouldn't. They only real fear was when Microsoft got handed it's anti-trust ruling at exactly the same time the AOL merger took place.

    20. Re:surprised? by thales · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "they didn't 'screw' TW in the merger"

      The Merger rated AOL as being slightly more valuable than TW. There is no way in Hell that AOL was worth more than a fraction of the value of TW at that time. As to who screwed who, that was a joint screwing. Just how much of it was AOL screwing TW stockholders, and how much of it was TW screwing themselves is debatable, but the TW stockholders did get screwed and they blame AOL for the screwing.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    21. Re:surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Anyone would wonder if Winamp and Netscape were just tools to help them get their way."

      Don't forget Sun...

    22. Re:surprised? by mcubed · · Score: 1

      With the exception of Warner Bros. Studios, these companies are based on subscriber base. How can you sell ad space without a large subscriber base? The millions of people AOL reaches through it's service, and the billions it reaches through it's properties (AIM, etc.). Goes further than the subscriber base of Time.

      I believe the point the previous post made is that Time Warner owns content. Time, SI, etc., are subscriber-based, sure (though I believe People is more newstand-based), but Time Warner retains and exploits the copyright on much of the content in all its publications. And then lets not forget HBO and other cable channels, Warner Music and its back catalog, and the book publishing divisions, in addtion to the movie and TV studios. Time Warner has made more off "The Sopranos" than AOL will ever make from AOL-IM.

      And, my other point was that they didn't 'screw' TW in the merger, and if you still think they did, you have to admit, that it wasn't intentional.

      I wouldn't characterize it as AOL screwing Time Warner, but I would say than TW shareholders got screwed nonetheless. It was a bad deal all around, far worse for Time Warner than for AOL. Time Warner has real assets, a good mix of product lines that variously depend on subscribers, advertising revenue, retail sales, subsidiary IP licensing. AOL has ... subscribers, over-stated advertising revenue, and not much else. I doubt either company's stock would have gone down as much as the combined company's stock sank, but I can't imagine why anyone would think Time Warner would have fared worse than AOL on its own.

      Michael

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    23. Re:surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft isn't that powerful of a company. Yes, if you are a small software startup, or are competing in their arena, you will get eaten up, but there are lots of companies bigger than Microsoft. They are ranked 15 (in America) by Forbes (Fortune seems to keep their rankings secret, but you could probably find them if you try.)

      Microsoft stock does have the highest market cap, but that is because most of it is held privately by Bill Gates, and a few others (Allen, Balmer, etc.) so there is an artificial demand. Microsoft is probably trading at 10 times it's real value if all their stock were fluid.

    24. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      You've changed your stance again!!?! Here is your original comment that I took offense to:

      but the real change came when the TW people found out that they got screwed in the merger and won a sucessful fight to take control of the company including the former AOL holdings

      Here, I read 'TW people' as being Time Warner the company (employees, mgmt). You don't refer to the stockholders there...

      If you are concerned for the welfare of the stockholders of TW, I can sympathize, except that I lost a ton too, but I didn't panic sell. I don't think AOL will bounce back any time soon, but I also don't blame them for riding the same bubble that everyone else rode. Let's not forget that the shareholders that 'did get screwed' (with your emphasis) could have sold if they took a look at AOL's books and saw the outrageous P/E, and OPS. I mean, during the bubble, everyone ignored even these fundamental stock value indicators, I continue to hold my stance from another post, that if you (or any shareholder for that matter) saw this tumble coming, you could have got out when TW stock was converted to 1.5 shares of AOL stock. If you had right then you would have prospered greatly. Only a few old-timers like my father, told us over and over again that it wouldn't last. Did I believe him? Well, I am still working for a living right ? :)

      If you knew that this was such a bad deal, how come I don't see any of your posts in the original 'AOL merging with TW' articles on /.? I did a few simple searches, but my guess is that no matter how hard I look, I won't find it. You are playing Monday morning quarterback and getting modded up for it... So be it.

    25. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      I never said they would have fared worse... Check some of my other posts, I just said that they aren't solely to blame as everyone likes to do. I outline a few scenarios in another post. One is that the merger never happens. Two is that the merger happens, but stockholders get out at the right time. And three is what everyone complains about. You can find it here

    26. Re:surprised? by thales · · Score: 1

      Hee Hee Hee!! I Dumped my TW stock as soon as that turkey of a merger was announced!!!

      I Had already dumped the Techs late in 1999 because I expected them to be bit by the Y2k bug. I Figured that everybody and his brother had upgraded in 1998 and 1999 to avoid the bug, and they wouldn't need another upgrade for 3 to 4 years, wiping the techs out. I sure as Hell wasn't about to trade real assets for something that I expected to dive in value.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    27. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      Well, there you go. Sounds like you didn't get screwed... You saw it coming and you sold, you weren't forced to lose any money, and you probably prospered more than most. Those of us that didn't read the indicators are to blame, not AOL.

    28. Re:surprised? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      You consider millions, I repeat, MILLIONS of customers damn few real assets?

      I call bullshit on this. AOL has been keeping their investors happy with inflated numbers like this for years.

      The walls are caving in now that everyone is wising up to the fact that some dolt putting a free 19,000 FREE HOURS!! AOL CD in their new Christmas computer does not a customer make.

    29. Re:surprised? by bnet41 · · Score: 1

      No one really screwed anyone. What happened is AOL and TW did not integrate the content properly. If you look at the newest AOL they are finally starting to do this, a day late and a dollar short though.

    30. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      call it as many times as you want, it doesn't make you right. You have never tried one of these AOL promotions have you? You insert the CD and it gets your billing information and verifies it before you are able to sign on. The billing system lets you slide for the first X hours (where X is the promotional number of hours, right now 1045 in the first month, or something like that), then starts billing you automatically. The people that claim to get free AOL are smart enough to cancel when the billing starts. This bicycling (using free time then canceling over and over again) has been shut down. This was the biggest dent in subscriber base thus far. It happened over a year ago that AOL made the concerted effort to put a stop to it, and they have done really well. The rest of the masses use their AOL casually from time to time and pay the 24.95$ a month without second thought.

      You can deny it all you want, but it is a fact that AOL has more dial-up subscribers than any other ISP on the planet.

    31. Re:surprised? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      You may be right on the sheer numbers but their churn rate is astronomical. There will come a point where every man, woman, and child has at one time been a (paying) AOL subscriber. Any business plan that does not involve keeping customers and keeping them happy is not going to last long.

      You can deny it all you want, but it is a fact that AOL has more dial-up subscribers than any other ISP on the planet.

      But for how long? That number means absolutely nothing if you can't keep them. There is no way in hell that AOL can continue to spend the kind of money they do on marketing to attract new customers. Sooner or later you have to please the ones you have attracted. This farce is gonna end soon.

    32. Re:surprised? by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Mergers in general take years to sort out and start bearing fruit. Hell, Time and Warner didn't look like a good idea until almost a decade after the fact.

    33. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      Hey, I didn't claim to know what AOL's long-term plans were for dial-up, in fact, I concede that AOL is in big trouble if they can't find a better business model. However, you said that their subscriber base numbers were bullshit... I can tell you with confidence that it is not bullshit. They are huge, they may not be that way forever, but right now, and at least for a while longer, the AOL subscriber base is a force to be reckoned with.

    34. Re:surprised? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      They are huge...

      Fine, you go ahead and content yourself with knowing that you were right- they currently have a lot of subscribers. That's like arguing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin- it's meaningless.

      In the meantime, the rest of us will analyze how well they can hold on to those customers- something that in the real world is meaningful.

    35. Re:surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its far far worse than you could possibly imagine. There are significant synergy issues within the merger, many divisions working in their own little fiefdoms without concern or regard for others. Instead of sharing content in a manner that makes sense and leveraging brands to create a more powerful entity - all the merger has done is increase the number of fiefdoms. It is a higly disappointing/depressing disaster that had, and in many ways still does, have enormous promise.

      The problem is that from the top-down, there just aren't the right management people in place to kick start the beast and turn it into an innovating powerhouse instead of a company 'existing' on its past successes. AOL/TW reminds me of a cancer patient - the inside of the company is diseased and needs to be cut out before the company can recover. There need to be more layoffs in middle management so that the right people across the company are working with/talking with each other.

      Until this happens, the prospects for AOL/TW will remain sketchy at best.

    36. Re:surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always use Winamp to play music, but what I absolutely _HATE_ it is because it adds AOL icons all over the place!

    37. Re:surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AOL need no longer spend money providing an alternative music player when Apple is doing a better job of it.

      Well, Winamp starts in a fraction of a second, I can run more than one copy of it at a time effortlessly, it collapses down to a 150x12 (or whatever) 'window' that still lets me do things like playback and seek control, and lots of other little things I can't be bothered to think about.

    38. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      That's like arguing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin- it's meaningless.

      Meaningless? No, arguing on the Internet is meaningless... Having millions of subscribers is significant! They are there now and will be there for at least a while longer.

      In the meantime, the rest of us will analyze how well they can hold on to those customers- something that in the real world is meaningful.

      Don't tell me that my argument was meaningless, I actually work for AOL. I didn't see any mention of your employment here. Your analysis doesn't mean shit to anyone I know, so you might as well be analyzing your angels on pinheads.

    39. Re:surprised? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      I actually work for AOL

      Which is why your argument is biased, emotional, and ..... meaningless.

    40. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      biased... probably, but you can't say it is meaningless, you are the moron that hasn't brought one fact to the table. If my arguments are meaningless, why would you say: you go ahead and content yourself with knowing that you were right ?

      Look, you spouted out some anecdotal BS, you got called out, and you can't back it up with any facts. You can refuse to believe me, but it is similar to a child who thinks you can't see her because she has her eyes are closed. I am more informed on the topic than you are and you can't seem to let accept it... A real man would be able to accept defeat, but instead I feel like we are both living up to the following pic

    41. Re:surprised? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Your employment at AOL makes you no more informed on the topic than my wearing UnderArmor makes me informed on that business.

      The fact remains that AOL used artificial means to inflate their user numbers and now the facade is coming crashing down.

      Apparently, I am not the only one who feels this way:

      " America Online (AOL) may have inflated subscriber numbers since the year 2000, according to The Wall Street Journal 's Friday report. Suspicion arose regarding AOL's subscriber numbers after the company dropped 846,000 subscriptions in the second quarter. The company admitted that part of the drop was due to inaccurate accounting. The large drop in subscriptions is believed to be the result of the company correcting subscription numbers inflated from the bulk sales of accounts.

      Beginning in 2000, AOL would sell bulk accounts to companies such as Target, Sears, and JC Penney. These limited-use accounts were sold to the companies for as little as US$1 to $3 each. These accounts were in turn sold to employees of the three companies at a cost of US$10, with the companies keeping the remaining profit. The gross number of accounts sold to a company would be reported in AOL's subscriber totals, even though the company had not resold the account to an actual subscriber yet."(http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2003Jul/ge e20030728021035.htm)

      And from Forbes:

      "A steep drop in subscriber growth at America Online, a unit of AOL Time Warner Inc (nyse: AOL - news - people), may in part reflect a halt in promotions that inflated its numbers in the past, the Wall Street Journal said on Friday. "(http://www.forbes.com/newswire/2003/07/25/rtr103 7837.html)

      So much for "anecdotal bullshit". Your move dude....

      BTW, I love that pic. Haven't seen it in awhile though.

    42. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 1

      AHA! So you finally found an article to back up your point, however your math is still wrong... Your article talks about 846,000. I'm telling you that AOL has millions of subscribers. You think I am uninformed, but I am telling you (even though it is your choice to believe me or not), that I have access to both the billing systems databases and user account databases. That is the joy of working in a group that generates reports.

      So, I'll give you your >1 million accounts w/o arguing, just so that I can say I am arguing fairly... 25 million - 1 million still equals over 24 million customers. I don't even care about subscriber size, look at our quarterly reports: http://biz.yahoo.com/e/031107/twx10-q.html

      Scroll it down to the part where we report on the quarterly revenue from AOL subscriptions, you'll see $ 1,892,000,000 for the quarter... Some quick math would show that it is around 25,277,000 and some change if all of them are paying ~25$ a month. If you are correct and AOL having millions of subscribers is indeed bullshit as you stated, then that would mean we would have less than 2,000,000 subscribers, let's say 1,999,999. That would mean that they each paid over 315$ a month for their service. Unlikely says I, I think that we do indeed have millions of subscribers, and that it is not bullshit.

      You might point to restated reports in the past, but do you really think a company would lie on their financial reports during an SEC investigation? Any-who, back to my original point (that you have yet to prove is bullshit) AOL has millions of subscribers. It was a simple fact, that you challenged me on. I am still right, your articles mention a small number of accounts and used the number of accounts churned to make the article seem like big news... Read it close you'll see that they don't mention how many accounts of the 846k were the Sears accounts, if it had been a high enough number to be concerned with, they would have given the real number. Read closer and try to learn how to put on your BS detector before you believe everything in the news. As for your Forbes article, they are just proving one of my posts a while back, AOL is losing customers (no doubt to broadband and some low-cost outfits), but it will be a long time before our customer base is bled dry. We have had slow time periods in the past even during the .com boom, but many times it is due to less marketing, or unsuccessful marketing campaigns. If all the sudden you receive less AOL CDs in the mail then normal, it could be that we aren't marketing as hard, so our normal churn surpasses our subscriber rate. It could be, maybe, just maybe, our marketing departments are trying to figure out how to get a hold of other markets currently and have laid off the narrowband marketing for a while.

      If you are truly interested, you can look around at some of our competition (MSN, SBC/Yahoo!) and count their subscriber numbers, you'll see that we have more than triple anyone else (even after your 'steep subscriber loss').

  3. kinda reminds me by BillFarber · · Score: 4, Funny
    of the old joke...

    Q: What do you call 450 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?

    A: A good start.

    1. Re:kinda reminds me by McLusky · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I wanted old, obvious jokes I'd watch Leno.

    2. Re:kinda reminds me by Smoking · · Score: 1, Funny

      450 of them in the sea looks more like an ecological disaster to me...

      Q

    3. Re:kinda reminds me by Seby123456 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Q: What's the difference between a lawyer and a prostitute? A: A prostitute will stop screwing you when you're dead

    4. Re:kinda reminds me by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, no lawyers were laid off at AOL. The TW/AOL/Netscape legal dept is always VERY busy.

      No surprise there ;)

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    5. Re:kinda reminds me by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      A prostitute probably also costs less, and is more likely to leave you feeling as if you got your money's worth.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:kinda reminds me by BillFarber · · Score: 1

      If I wanted lame insults, I would have told my friends about sleeping with your mother.

    7. Re:kinda reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least with a prostitute, the customer/client is asking to get fucked. :)

    8. Re:kinda reminds me by McLusky · · Score: 0

      I'll have you know that my mother is a whore. It doesn't come as a shock to me that she would sleep with the likes of you. I bet she loved your lame old lawyer jokes. Did you tell her the one about the chicken and the road? That one f'n cracks me up.
      So, you slept with an ugly bitch like my mom and all your friends could come up with were some lame insults?
      Bwahahahaha!!! Your friends wouldn't happen to write for The Tonight Show, would they?

  4. Hmm... by hookedup · · Score: 5, Funny


    "What we're doing is actually moving some of our projects into teams in other facilities."

    Sounds to me like winamp will have a distinct bangladesh feel to it next version :)

    1. Re:Hmm... by Digital+Mage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Winamp!....It really whips the elephant's ass!

    2. Re:Hmm... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds to me like winamp will have a distinct bangladesh feel to it next version :)

      Mark my words, if Winamp development ends up being sent overseas, the product will suffer.

      Just watch. Bad design decisions will creep in. They might even go so far as to use an awkward bitmapped interface instead of standard GUI widgets!

      It may even end up being the case where they release a new major version number, and it ends up being so bad that everyone sticks with the previous one instead!

      Oh wait.

    3. Re:Hmm... by BluedemonX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ever have the feeling this whole thread could just be replaced by a small script, macro or preprocessor directive?

      #include "thank_you_come_again.h"

      #include "indians_are_great_I_work_with_em_here.h"

      #include "taking_all_our_jobs.h"

      #include "youre_fat_and_lazy_and_expensive.h"

      #include "curry_muncher_7_11.h"

      #include "Nazi_accusation.h"

      #include "Godwins_law.h"

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    4. Re:Hmm... by baxissimo · · Score: 1

      Right on brutha!

      I don't think they've touched the code in over a year. Winamp is dead. Kiss it goodbye. The "new! Winamp 3!" button on the web page is just a joke now.

      The "new and improved" Winamp3 really sucked the llama's cock. The video features are crap, all the neat plugins that used to work with winamp2 broke, and display of non-Roman character sets (the only thing I really felt lacking in Winamp2) was still not implemented, and actually was made more difficult to get working by their great bitmap GUI and fonts idea. The big new feature out of the year or so of development on Winamp3 was, what, a UI that could be scripted and bitmapped? Whee. Oh boy. Look -- we just want to access our music with minimal hassle, people. Most of us couldn't care less whether the buttons on the UI get jiggy on mouseover, or whether we can make it look like a 6-year drew it, as long as it can play the music and display the song titles.

      I'll just stick with iTunes for Windows, thanks, which at least can display song titles properly, even if they're Japanese. And which integrates very nicely with my iPod as a bonus.

    5. Re:Hmm... by armyofone · · Score: 2, Informative
      It may even end up being the case where they release a new major version number, and it ends up being so bad that everyone sticks with the previous one instead!
      Or maybe they'll just switch to another player. Foobar is the antithesis of Winamp, WinMP, and their ilk. It's small, simple, and even supports OGG. 10 minutes after installing it, Winamp was yanked off my system & I've never looked back...
      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    6. Re:Hmm... by abischof · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just tried Foobar2000 and it's not bad on paper -- it has most of the features that I'm looking for. But, its interface just seems a bit plain for me :-/. So, I think I'll stick with Quintessential Player (which also supports Ogg).

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    7. Re:Hmm... by MrEd · · Score: 1

      Don't forget putting a web browser in an mp3 player! christ, it just needs to do your email and it will have expanded as much as it possibly can...

      --

      Wah!

    8. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Foobar interface is retarded for a music player. Anti-thesis to Winamp indeed. It IS completely opposite of it!

      I use the Quint player for playing CDs, which rarely happens anyways, mostly I just preview new stuff I bought to identify the tracks to rip. I never liked Winamp for playing CDs, always seemed a little choppy and clunky.

    9. Re:Hmm... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1


      Shit, I wonder what would happen if you threw Emacs into an mp3 player? Hehe

    10. Re:Hmm... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Shit, I wonder what would happen if you threw Emacs into an mp3 player? Hehe

      Would that be sort of the opposite of this?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    11. Re:Hmm... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Shit, I wonder what would happen if you threw Emacs into an mp3 player? Hehe

      Would that be sort of the opposite of this?


      Well now I've seen it all. I'm going to become a tour guide next... ;)

    12. Re:Hmm... by cous_2000 · · Score: 1
      I seem to remember....

      **from the winamp 2.91 whatsnew.txt file**
      Winamp 2.50:
      * Winamp is now freeware! Thanks to all who have previously registered, your support is really appreciated!

      now with the newer winamp releases
      *during setup* put AOL icon on desktop (or something to that effect)
      and...
      winamp pro!?

      Sounds somewhat like the pre-2.5 again, thanks all in part to America Online. So easy to get screwed, no wonder it's #1!

      --
      Please send comments to Helen Wait
    13. Re:Hmm... by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Winamp5 has been in active development for months and to my knowledge they just released RC1 after a long alpha/beta cycle. Sure, Winamp3 hasn't been touched in a year -- that's because it sucks and you're unlikely to find a person on the planet who doesn't agree.

      Shit, at least learn what you're talking about before you go spewing verbal diarrhea.

    14. Re:Hmm... by armyofone · · Score: 1

      Yup. It's very plain - which I don't mind because I rarely look at it. The cool thing about FooBar is that you can program global hot-keys. Starting stopping, pausing, and resuming can be done without using the interface. If I'm working in another app and the phone rings, or the boss walks in to shoot the breeze, I just press CTL+SHF+ALT+X to pause play - the same keystroke resumes when I'm ready to crank it up again.

      Foobar also seems to have a better random function than WinAmp. I rarely get the same song twice in a 10-hour day. Of course, that may be due to the fact that I currently have 2422 songs in the playlist, (all legally ripped from CDs I own, BTW).

      On your recommendation, I browsed the Quintessential Player site and it looks pretty nice. But at a download size more than three times the size of FooBar, I'm just not interested. I usually have between 6-10 large apps open at a time on my workstation here at work, (Office, CAD, e-mail, browser, etc...). Having an OGG player with a tiny memory footprint and programmable hot-keys works best for me.

      Since I hadn't heard of QP, I just went and modded your post as 'Informative'. QP may be just what other folks are looking for. It's just not for me.

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
  5. New math? by withak53 · · Score: 5, Funny

    675 - 450 = 300?

    1. Re:New math? by mangu · · Score: 1

      Expect a dupe soon telling where the remaining 75 came from...

    2. Re:New math? by Darkelf · · Score: 1
      RTFA:



      closing its offices in San Francisco and San Diego and eliminating 375 positions at its Mountain View campus, the company revealed Tuesday.

      --
      -Darkelf
    3. Re:New math? by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 3, Funny

      riaa cd-burner math?

    4. Re:New math? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really new math. It is the same math coming from Excell.

    5. Re:New math? by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 0

      perhaps he was only referring to the /. error.

      maybe he did rtfa and was wondering where marklein (submitter) got the number 400.

    6. Re:New math? by krumms · · Score: 1

      675 - 450 = 300?

      See, they laid off all the accountants. Management had to do the math. AOL management, being extremely scared of math had to hire the underpants gnomes to do the math for them - all the while making special note that it would be nice if they could come up with a "nice, round figure" for the resulting complex equation. Because, y'know, the management folk weren't too bright. So for forty days and forty nights the gnomes set about formulating their ... well, their formula and came up with the following:

      675 -
      450
      ???
      ---
      300!

      And AOL management were happy.

    7. Re:New math? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      durrhurrhurr.
      Fucking retard.

    8. Re:New math? by chabotc · · Score: 1

      No, old skewl "i don't even read the headline, never mind the article" ./ style postings.

      375 are being laid off from former Netscape campus. On top off that the San Francisco office is being closed along with an office in San Diego (from those people 100 are being offered jobs elsewhere).

      In other words, the 450 people being laid off are not just from the netscape campus, but from a total of 3 places.. Ergo your math question is more a question of reading abilities ;-)

    9. Re:New math? by withak53 · · Score: 1

      I did read it, I was just making a joke.

      Try some decaf.

  6. Math by swordboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    675 - 300 = 375

    Am I missing something? Where does 450 come from?

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Math by Kyoya · · Score: 1

      Well that's 375 at the old Netscape Campus and the other 75 from the San Francisco office.

      --
      To strive, to seek, but not to yield
    2. Re:Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      America Online Inc. (AOL) is significantly reducing its software development operations in California by closing its offices in San Francisco and San Diego and eliminating 375 positions at its Mountain View campus, the company revealed Tuesday.
    3. Re:Math by *weasel · · Score: 3, Informative

      675 is the number of employees at the netscape campus that is being reduced to 300. == -375 jobs

      as you point out. but that is only 1 of the 3 california offices being hit with layoffs in California. 450 refers to the number of total jobs lost in the entire state.

      This leaves the balance of the 450 lost jobs (the 75 missing from the nestcape-alone tally) to come from the number of non-re-located employees from the sanfran complex (housing spinner and nullsoft), and the san diego offices.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    4. Re:Math by Savagemutt · · Score: 1, Funny

      They're using the new improved "SCO Math"; a companion piece to the wildly popular "SCO Logic" and "SCO Legal Theory".

      Look for a seminar coming to your area soon!

      --
      I'm not a nerd. I'm just here for the free food.
    5. Re:Math by SharkJumper · · Score: 2, Funny

      It comes from the same place as those 1500 free hours that you have to use within 60 days.

      SharkJumper

    6. Re:Math by BdosError · · Score: 1
      Read the next sentence:
      The San Francisco office, which they obtained when they acquired Spinner (now Radio@AOL), and which housed Nullsoft after their acquisition by AOL, is being closed along with an office in San Diego.
      Those places are also in CA.

      Jeez, I know it's common not to RTFA around here, but at least RTF Post.
      --
      Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
  7. what about other non aol user features? by inf0c0m · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what about other aol services that non aol people use? aka aol instant messenger, icq, etc etc?

    1. Re:what about other non aol user features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the AOL Instant Messenger work gets done in Reston, VA, not in California.

  8. Hope Justin is still employed by Lshmael · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...especially since the new Winamp is supposed to come out sometime really soon.

    1. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by Hangtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Somehow even if AOL was stupid enough to lay him off, I am sure the creator and lead for WinAmp would have NO problem finding employment. In fact, I bet a certain company in Redmond, WA wouldn't have any problem in picking him up.

    2. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      Winamp 5.0?

      Is this the Fibonacci release or something?

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    3. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by SuperMo0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In fact, I bet a certain company in Redmond, WA wouldn't have any problem in picking him up.

      NINTENDO OF AMERICA'S GOING TO BUY WINAMP? GASP!

    4. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by SuperMo0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The logic behind numbering it 5.0 is that it takes the best features of 2.0 (most everything) and 3.0 (the improved music library, dynamic skinning), and Winamp 2 + 3 = Winamp 5.

    5. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by Lshmael · · Score: 1

      Winamp 2 + Winamp 3 = WINAMP 5!

      So in a way, yes.

    6. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by ActiveSX · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I remember correctly, Justin quit Nullsoft a while back. Ah, here's the link.

    7. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by RussGarrett · · Score: 4, Informative

      Both NYTimes and slashdot jumped the gun there, he certainly does still work for AOL. Read his .plan.

    8. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

      Listen to Russ and try again

    9. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by Barkmullz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      His .plan has a link to a picture of Winamp being used on the space station. woot.

      --
      Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
    10. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never realized Nintendo in the U.S. is also based in Redmond. Considering how Nintendo had some of the strictest contracts for developing video games for its systems and how it was busted for price fixing, Nintendo and Microsoft mark Redmond as one cursed city.

    11. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Nintendo of America is actually less than a mile from the Microsoft-Redmond campus if I remember correctly. At least, the building I saw with the Nintendo logo on it was ... :)

    12. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by gabbarsingh · · Score: 1

      that should be:

      Winamp 2 + Winamp 3 = 2Winamp + 5

    13. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      Alright, that's false then. I just remembered skimming over it one day, and didn't bother to RTFA.

    14. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by Bopheenee · · Score: 1

      Hahahah! gee, that's kinda rich. Come to think of it, an mp3 mod for gamecube wouldn't be so bad =P

    15. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by YetAnotherLogin · · Score: 1

      Um..no. You factor out the Winamp, which leaves you with

      Winamp 2 + Winamp 3 = Winamp * (2 + 3) = Winamp 5

  9. AOL's Interests by johnhennessy · · Score: 1

    I think we all now where AOL's interests now lie.

    This highlights one of the dangers of acquisition: once the mother ship no longer thinks your trendy to have in their portfolio - they'll cut you out faster than they acquired you.

    --
    [ Monday is a terrible way to spend one seventh of your life. ]
    1. Re:AOL's Interests by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "one of the inevitabilities of acquisition." The company that acquires you will always assume their own people can do your job better. I have never seen a company acquired that maintained more than 50% of its staff over the next year...and seen plenty reduced to a handful of lonely essentials in some barren satelite office.

      A word of advice: if somebody wants to acquire you, don't listen to the lies. Get an employment agreement that's to your benefit along with the massive payout. Put the payout in the bank (or use it to reduce your existing house/car/student loans). And if you're making good money right now, and enjoying yourself, don't let yourself be acquired! It can ONLY spell eventual heartbreak.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  10. XMMS by zoomba · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wouldn't be surprised if XMMS suddenly got a whole lot of new talent on the dev team and it suddenly becomes the defacto media player if WinAmp is left to die.

    1. Re:XMMS by Hypocritical+Guy · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be surprised if XMMS suddenly got a whole lot of new talent on the dev team and it suddenly becomes the defacto media player if WinAmp is left to die.

      I would be surprised. XMMS is a buggy piece of shit that doesn't even sound good. When its not segfaulting, its playing 44kHZ files so that they sound like 22kHz. Winamp sounds much better. You can even try the old Winamp 3 beta for Linux and it sounds much better than XMMS.

      --
      If you liked licking my balls, add me to your foes list!
    2. Re:XMMS by larien · · Score: 1
      To be honest, I don't believe much has happened on XMMS for the last two-three years apart from a couple of incremental updates. This is, in essence, due to the fact that it was largely "done" by that point and was pretty solid and there wasn't much to do.

      Also, XMMS is *nix only and would require considerable work to even load on Windows, let alone play MP3s with any quality.

    3. Re:XMMS by Fancia · · Score: 1

      Very curious; I've had no such experience with XMMS. It's only ever frozen when I was betatesting a plugin and its 44kHz certainly doesn't sound like 22kHz. Its audio output is fine for me.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    4. Re:XMMS by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      Bah, Winamp never needed improving on after Winamp 2, no need for XMMS unless some features lacking in Winamp 2 show up in it. Personally I've switched to iTunes and am rather satisfied with it, although it crashes for everyone else.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    5. Re:XMMS by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see someone work a better interface on to Mplayer than porting xmms. XMMS always was just a winamp clone, sure it addes some innovative features, but at its heart you can see winamp2 all over it.

      mplayer on the other hand would make a great base, it already decodes everything you can think of with more options than you'll ever need, just throw a pretty gui on it and some playlist management and you'd have a great alternative.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    6. Re:XMMS by Mage+Powers · · Score: 1

      i like the media library, its good for cases when people have all of there mp3's in one directory, no sub directories.

    7. Re:XMMS by pdbaby · · Score: 1

      I agree about iTunes crashing: having tested iTunes, I find that it is incredibly buggy. For playing OGGs (or MP3s), Winamp 2 Just Works(tm). I don't do playlists (although if on occasion I do, I find it easy to do with winamp). Then again, if XMMS was ported to Windows we could tweak our music player just as we wanted -- all hail open source! (plus XMMS sounds cooler than winamp...)

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    8. Re:XMMS by Quino · · Score: 1

      Winamp 2 is pretty sweet as is, can play ogg files (the legal status of the MP3 format itself worries me more, honestly. What if they went "FAT" on us?), and has a functional if somewhat bare music library feature.

      Just recently realized too (I'm not sure I was supposed to be surprised by this) that Winamp can use XMMS skins ...

      What I'm personally waiting for is a port of Mplayer or Xine to Windows -- finally, one player for Windows to handle all the formats!

  11. AOL Winamp by turtlexit · · Score: 1
    AOL acquired Nullsoft? Yay. Now I can look forward to my music client being plastered with icon smilies and have it crash whenever I play a malformed MP3.

    Its quite a shame to see Netscape being disassembled like this. I remember the glory days of NS, back before IE was even a player on the market.

    1. Re:AOL Winamp by mccalli · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I remember the glory days of NS, back before IE was even a player on the market.

      So do I. I remember people talking about them being "the next Microsoft", and not in a flattering sense. I remember the incompatible tags they introduced. I remember the appalling mess of Netscape 4 and CSS.

      And then there was the <blink> tag...

      I can remember distinctly when I switched to IE, and at the time it was because IE was better, not because Microsoft forced me to. I can also remember switching back to Mozilla (and then Firebird), again because the browser was better.

      I would argue that the glory days of Netscape stopped at Netscpe 3, took a break and restarted in the present time due to Mozilla. I'm not certain now what percentage of Mozilla developers are ex-Netscape, but I imagine it's still high enough to be called Netscape-in-another-form.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:AOL Winamp by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      AOL acquired Nullsoft? Yay. Now I can look forward to my music client being plastered with icon smilies and have it crash whenever I play a malformed MP3.

      AOL acquired Nullsoft a long time ago. Well before their version 3 release... which coincidently is said to be their worst release ever. Hmmm. Maybe you have a point.

    3. Re:AOL Winamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL acquired Nullsoft? Yay.

      Old news. Still, Winamp 5 seems to be turning out just fine.

    4. Re:AOL Winamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL aquired Nullsoft a LONG time ago, and they basically left it alone. Wish they had done the same for ICQ.

    5. Re:AOL Winamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I remember the glory days of NS, back before IE was even a player on the market.

      Isn't IE based on Mosaic? I seem to remember reading that in the EULA or About for IE sometime back.

      Oh yeah, here it is "Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign."

      So in a way, IE was around back then.

    6. Re:AOL Winamp by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nullsoft has been owned by AOL for three years now and isn't that branded. In fact AOL has been traditionally tried to forge separate identities for all of its acquisitions - think of Compuserve, Netscape, Mapquest, Nullsoft, Moviefone, DigitalCity etc. While there might be an AOL logo, link or icon here or there, but they pretty much retained their own distinct look and feel.

      Unfortunately, AOL has gone down the pan and perhaps this distinction now works against them. Perhaps management doesn't feel the same guilt from slashing jobs when they're not technically AOL jobs.

      For example, what do you do if you're using a proprietary, obsolete, closed source, single platform browser made by your main competitor but your Netscape division has developed an open source, standards compliant browser, capable of embedding in any app on any platform? Answer - sack all the Netscape developers of course! Why? Who knows, but I bet it boiled down to "not invented here" syndrome - IE is comfortable straitjacket, which Gecko is some scary 'open source' thing. AOL has become institutionalized.

      I bet some management / marketing idiots fretted over the minor flux of replacing IE with the slightly scary Gecko and scuppered it. Apparantly AOL thinks letting your main competitor control your content delivery mechanism is good business, not sheer stupidity.

      Nullsoft is another example of AOL stupidity. What do you do when you own one of the most popular media players on the market? Why, licence all your streaming content and players from Real of course! And for good measure, sign deals with Apple to sell your own music from their store when you've had the chance to sell direct using WinAmp via its minibrowser for three years.

      In summary, there are some very dim bulbs in AOL.

    7. Re:AOL Winamp by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      You're not the problem though.

      Used to be, everyone used Netscape. Somehow they all managed to acquire the software for free online. Then IE happened. Everyone uninstalled Netscape for good reasons. Now Netscape is better once again... but... EVERYONE FORGOT HOW TO INSTALL NETSCAPE!

    8. Re:AOL Winamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember those days as well. As for appalling messes, however, I have to admit Netscape 4.7x is faster than Firebird. I took Firebird--all half gig of source!--and stripped out every ounce of cruft in the .mozconfig, including mathML and other stuff I never need, and I compiled it with aggressive options, but on my old machine (but with 256 MB RAM) there is no contest between Firebird and Netscape 4. I can't even close the options menu in Firebird without it taking 5-10 seconds.

      So every time I go back to using Netscape 4.7x I realize that was the glory days of browsing.

  12. Does affect Nullsoft by RussGarrett · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two Nullsoft employees (Brennan and Aus) were yesterday. Winamp will continue though.

    1. Re:Does affect Nullsoft by asciimonster · · Score: 1
      > Winamp will continue though

      I beg to differ. The last entry on the developer page (here) was dated 19 March 2003. I think that spells about cancelledware to me. Maintaining a website just isn't good enough.

    2. Re:Does affect Nullsoft by RussGarrett · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's try that again. Preview button, pfft.

      Two Nullsoft employees (Brennan and Aus) were laid off yesterday. Winamp will continue though.

    3. Re:Does affect Nullsoft by RussGarrett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A new version is imminent. Unfortunately AOL are still debating the definition of "imminent" (it's finished, just the actual release is held up for unknown reasons).

    4. Re:Does affect Nullsoft by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, the release is not all that imminent, considering that this page was originally letting you download RC 3 of the beta, and it's currently on RC 10. I don't quite think they're done with it, sir.

    5. Re:Does affect Nullsoft by RussGarrett · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those RCs are very incremental changes. RC6 was of release quality, but Justin keeps improving it while AOL sort out whatever problems they're having. As I said, "imminent" is defined by AOL.

    6. Re:Does affect Nullsoft by Kevon · · Score: 1

      I just want to say I feel bad for all of you at nullsoft. Winamp5 looks damn fine in my book. It's a shame something like this has to happen before the new version comes out. There seems to be a lot of excitement about it, which is good I think.

      I sure hope things work out for those who lost their jobs, not only at Nulsoft, but AOL and Black Isle yesterday as well.

  13. Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by ThomasFlip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AOL started out in the dial up industry which from what I can tell has gone right down the shitter for them, however they still managed to merger with Time-Warner before they figured out. Now what have they got? Certainly dial up won't get them anywhere, and the broadband service they offer is just a piece of seemingly annoying proprietary software. Where can they go from here ?

    --
    If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    1. Re:Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 4, Funny

      and the broadband service they offer is just a piece of seemingly annoying proprietary software.

      If you didn't notice, AOL is the leading provider of seemingly annoying proprietary software, along with Microsoft and SCO...

    2. Re:Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by VargrX · · Score: 1
      so sayeth ThomasFlip:
      AOL started out in the dial up industry


      Actually AOL started in the timeshare industry, backed by (I believe) TymeNET, then got into the dialup side of things after genie/prodigy/compuserve/etc got more popular. They ended up buying out the local isp I started way back when to 'kickstart' (thier word) local usage. It wasn't too bad back then (version 1.0 or something to that affect), but I thought at the time that the other services would trample them, but I didn't really care (by that time, I had discovered the wonderful world of partial T1's.. :) )

      --
      Sometimes people just have to learn and adapt to change, it is one of the requirements of being a living thing.
    3. Re:Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      I think so. First, dialup isn't dead, at least not for a few more years, so they still have several million people sending in $23.90/month (or whatever it is now). That at least gives them a little time.

      Second, they have some killer brand names: AOL, WinAmp, AIM. Don't underestimate the power of a brand name (see napster). They have the opportunity to spin off into other area's (hopefully not spyware). Why doesn't AOL have a music download service like iTunes? They had TimeWarner's music catalog available but didn't do anything with it. Hell, they could even offer video downloads of TimeWarner movies and shows, that's a huge draw. I'm sure they were concerned with piracy, but I'm sure they could work some DRM into the AOL client, plus, it's not like AOL users are a bunch of warez junkies.

      Which brings me to my third point. Convenience. AOL is very convenient for non-techie folk. I don't use AOL because I know how to install and configure seperate components that will do the same thing better. But many people don't know how to configure an email client, or even know what a newsreader is, much less care that they have a choice in browsers. AOL is like your corner convenience store, everything in one place. Sure, it cost a little more, and the selection isn't that great, but it's right here. And that's what many people like about AOL, everything they want is right in front of them in one happy, fun-time, colorful interface.

      I won't even go into my idea of how AOL and WalMart could brand their own pc's running linux and crush M$ in the long run. Unfortunetly, as these layoffs show, it appears AOL is run by the PHB's and are content to milk what they can from the beast while it slowly dies. The CEO's and accountants will make a few million and destroy the company, leaving all the minions out in the cold.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    4. Re:Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      Where they can go from here is obvious: finishing the Time-Warner/AOL merger to make all of that great TW content available free to AOL users, and to everyone else at a cost.

      CNN.com sells all kind of nifty video services-those should be free for AOL users. RollingStone.com sells old articles-make those free for AOL. RollingStone.com also gives away half of the RollingStone interview online each month as an enticement to buy the magazine-give AOL users the whole thing. Create high-quality radio feeds playing nothing but TW music, only for AOL users. All of those TW movies that one can download for a fee? Give AOL users a price break.

      This was what the AOL/TW merger was supposed to be, but for the two companies had very different personalities, and never meshed well. Rather than just break out the iron fist and get people working, the executives decided that they would be better off to just be nice about it and hope that things will just work out somehow. What AOL needs now is a guy like Steve Jobs, who isn't afraid to be an asshole, to come in, kick some asses, fire anyone who can't get this done, and they might just have enough time left to make it work. If they had done so two years ago, AOL would be on top of the world right now.

    5. Re:Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by c1pher · · Score: 1

      that's because they're "So easy to use, no wonder it's #1!"

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
    6. Re:Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by Charles+Gaudette · · Score: 1

      AOL is not really in the dial-up industry. They are a marketing company that happens to sell dial-up. Just like General Motors and cars, they are in it for the money and nothing else. Period.

      As for where do they go from here? Nowhere. It is just a matter of time. AOL must play marketing hardball to survive and they always have done that. As revenues decline so will their ability to market a waning product, and so-on down and down.

      The question is not where, but when.

  14. Reduction in force... by _Pinky_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    So does this mean I can expect a reduction of AOL cds in my mail?

    1. Re:Reduction in force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a little note:
      AOL considers all those little CD's it sends out as Long Term Assets. If they were to ever stop sending these out, they'd have to recognize the loss in investment on their financial statements, which will drive down their stock even further.

  15. Re:eh by metallikop · · Score: 2

    Looks like he still works at Nullsoft to me, though it doesn't look like he knew that this was coming, or he didn't care: http://www.webdog.org/plans/314/

  16. About the layoffs... by Clay+Mitchell · · Score: 3, Informative

    I heard from a friend who works for AOL - their entire internal support staff is being moved offshore (to india).

    i have no idea if this is the same layoffs though...

    1. Re:About the layoffs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I heard from a friend who works for AOL - their entire internal support staff is being moved offshore (to india).

      Will they change their name to IOL (India OnLine)?

    2. Re:About the layoffs... by plexxer · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's okay - I'm used to not understanding anyone I talk to from AOL.

      --
      The government's moral compass is controlled by GPS.
      In times of crises, they alter it to suit their needs.
    3. Re:About the layoffs... by wawannem · · Score: 2, Informative

      I heard from a friend who works for AOL - their entire internal support staff is being moved offshore (to india).

      I actually do work for AOL, and I can clear this up a bit...

      There was an attempt to open *one* Indian call center. The call centers for AOL in America have been very difficult to maintain, they have a 35% churn and this gets costly when you think about it from a maintenance and training perspective. Someone had the idea that maybe we could take advantage of the cheap labor in India (this was before many other organizations moved dev work to India, like in 2000). It didn't garner much press that we were opening a call center there. In fact, one of the guys that works here in my location went to India on a regular basis (three weeks out of every month).

      I don't know when the call center was closed down, but I know that it ended up not working out the way it was planned. So, before everyone gets their panties in a bunch about moving some work to India, remember, that AOL did it before everyone starting griping about it, and when it wasn't working out, they pulled out and pushed the labor back to the US. The jobs that would have been lost pay $8 per hour with little to no benefits (phone tech support).

      On another note, I saw a post above where someone is bashing AOL... He mentions commodity ISP equipment. Now, think about that for a second. Do you really think AOL could run its service off commodity equipment? We are talking about an ISP with over 20 million customers! They had over 35 million during their peak. I'd like to see this bozo run an operation that large with his commodity equipment. Just because you learned the name of some equipment on the tour of your local ISP's server room doesn't mean you'd know how to handle our load ;)

    4. Re:About the layoffs... by zulux · · Score: 1

      I heard from a friend who works for AOL - their entire internal support staff is being moved offshore (to india).

      Oh thats gotta be fun:

      AOL Office Type: My internet connection is down here at the office.
      AOL Internal Supprot: Please check out in-basket and find the AOL CD. Now... we'll need a major credit-card.....

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    5. Re:About the layoffs... by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

      This is FUD. I work for TW on the webdev side, no support staff move has been announced. They tout AOL as being the easiest experience for users to get online. You really think they'd move the support staff to another country where their accents are so thick no customer would be able to understand them? We would have gotten a company memo about it. We get them about every staff change that happens. Now, unless I mistakenly deleted it I don't remember seeing one come through. show me the memo!

    6. Re:About the layoffs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people make so much noise about Indian call centers, but every second thing I buy here in the US is marked "Made in China". WTF?

    7. Re:About the layoffs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd know how to handle our load

      Whoa now! Keep the conversation clean.

    8. Re:About the layoffs... by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 1
      they have a 35% churn and this gets costly when you think about it from a maintenance and training perspective
      .......
      The jobs that would have been lost pay $8 per hour with little to no benefits (phone tech support)
      See a pattern here?
    9. Re:About the layoffs... by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      I saw a post above where someone is bashing AOL... He mentions commodity ISP equipment. Now, think about that for a second. Do you really think AOL could run its service off commodity equipment? We are talking about an ISP with over 20 million customers! They had over 35 million during their peak. I'd like to see this bozo run an operation that large with his commodity equipment. Just because you learned the name of some equipment on the tour of your local ISP's server room doesn't mean you'd know how to handle our load ;)

      I haven't read the post you refer to, but simply mentioning commodity equipment is not what I'd consider insulting or unrealistic. Google runs their farm on commodity equipment, and they have a very heavy load to deal with. I do think that AOL could run it's service off commodity equipment, and if they don't then the stockholders had better hope it's for a better reason than hardware prejudice. There are real cost savings out there to be realized, and truly good hardware is getting cheaper by the minute.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    10. Re:About the layoffs... by wawannem · · Score: 1

      Google runs off commodity equipment, but there is a difference between running a cluster of linux machines with varyingly different hardware and running a heterogeneous environment of networking equipment. Each piece of equipment that comes from a different manufacturer will have a completely different CLI. Also, one of the things that commodity equipment skimps on is the monitoring facilities, if it doesn't support at least SNMP it will be difficult to monitor. With the commodity equipment that google is running, all of these details are abstracted by the Operating System. Where we can, we do use commodity equipment (web servers, etc.), but the kind of equipment I was referring to in my original post doesn't qualify.

  17. What These People Heard On Logging In by Spencerian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello!
    You got laid off!
    Goodbye.
    %$##@!

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  18. could be worse by auzy · · Score: 1

    At least Microsoft never bought winamp, or next version would be "winampXP", which would have digital rights management, and to greatly improve productivity, an MSN banner scrolling at the bottom... And of course that awful format known as MP3 would be replaced with the superior microsoft (T) wma codec

    1. Re:could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Nullsoft tried for a long time to get a licen.se to support Windows Media DRM 2.0 but Microsoft wouldn't give it to them. At least that's what they kept telling us.

  19. Welcome! by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've got a pink slip!

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
    1. Re:Welcome! by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1


      Me too!
      </aol>

  20. foobar2000 by Czernobog · · Score: 2, Informative

    It has all the features WinAmp2 has, minus quite a few :-)
    Seriously, though, it's awesome.Has replaced all audio playback players I've had/used.

    --
    /. Where the truth
    1. Re:foobar2000 by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      foobar is built into my mIRC script that I have... it's quite the slim player, if you only want to play MP3s... but a lot of people want their player to play EVERYTHING.

    2. Re:foobar2000 by Czernobog · · Score: 1

      It plays just about everything. Not just mp3s... The reason I got f00bar2k in the first place, was because I wanted to play m4a files (MP4/AAC)...

      --
      /. Where the truth
    3. Re:foobar2000 by real_smiff · · Score: 0
      if you install Case's special build, you get out of the box support for (just reading the installer file association box): .FPL .M3U8 .M3U .PLS .WAV .AIFF .AIF .IFF .SVX .SND .AU .VOC .CUE .APL .OGG .MPC .MP+ .MPP .MP3 .MP2 .MP4 .M4A .AAC .FLAC .FLA .APE .MAC .WV .SHN .OFR .OFS .PAC .SPX .WMA (needs MS libs) .AC3 .XM .IT .S3M .MOD .MTM .UMX .MDZ .S3Z .ITZ .XMZ .MO3 .TFM .SPC .PSF .MINIPSF .PSF2 .MINIPSF2 .NSF .KSS .GBR .GBS .HES .PCE .AY .CPC .SID .XA .CDA (Audio CD)

      is that seriously not enough for you? :p it won't however play video..

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    4. Re:foobar2000 by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      That's what I meant. Some people (like me) don't want one player for audio and another for video.

  21. Re:Someone please save WinAmp!!! by SteveX · · Score: 1
    Winamp 5 looks amazingly good. The Internet TV feature is the "Instant On" that Windows Media Player just couldn't get right. Funny thing is Winamp 5 betas are circulating, and seem to be actively developed with new betas released fairly frequently, but there's no mention on it on the Nullsoft or Winamp pages.

    A Google search will find you lots of places to get it though.

  22. No not really... by emo+boy · · Score: 3, Funny

    No actually it's an increase that's coming in the future. They've actually laid off a brewing anti-"cd shipping" group within the company that was distributing propaganda to eliminate the cd's that we enjoy getting in the mail. Thank God they shut these guys down. Now I can finish building my house of CDs...egg-cellent.

    1. Re:No not really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now wait just a minizzle.

    2. Re:No not really... by DChristensen · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's AOL 9.0 Optimized! You'll want to finish that house of CDs with a Snoop Dogg record.

      (Nice sig, BTW...)

      --

      --
      Mac OS X--Unix without the assholes^Whassles.

  23. Tis the Christmas Season by demigod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tis the Christmas Season, I got my notice yesterday,
    though I don't/didn't work for AOL.

    That drops our ratio of UNIX admins to UNIX servers
    from 1/200 to 1/400.

    --
    "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
    Major Major
    1. Re:Tis the Christmas Season by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 1

      look at it this way, at least that poor guy handling 400 unix boxes has just unix boxes and not win2000 servers or something. THAT would be aweful. if theyve been around long enough they should be rock solid by now.

      and to ms-fanboys reading this, i dont want to hear it. unix boxes are rock solid (especially on good hw) and dont have to be patched every other day. less maintenance is a very good thing when its 1/400.

      oh, and to stay on topic (since i got modded offtopic and redundant for being the first one to point out something offtopic), what is the deal with aol broadband? looks to me like its not even access, just a syrupy(as in slow) sugar coating for your existing connection...

    2. Re:Tis the Christmas Season by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      I hate to laugh

      But haha...there was 2 people working there and you got fired :)

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    3. Re:Tis the Christmas Season by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That sucks hardcore.

      My guess is whatever company that was simply wanted to milk another 50 grand or so out of their operation. Web hosting? Colo? Data storage? Surely enough money was coming in to pay you.

      The pathetic thing is, when hardware starts to reach the end of its lifetime, that 1 admin is going to be sweating bullets. Particularly if it was all purchased at the same time - he'll be way over-worked. (As if he probably isn't already.) I pitty him having to apply patches to every one of those 400 boxen.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Tis the Christmas Season by demigod · · Score: 1

      It was either my boss or me. He chose to keep his job.

      --
      "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
      Major Major
  24. ho, ho, ho by twitter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Merry Christmas!

    Oh well, it can be worse. You could get ranked and yanked, like I did. When that happens, they paper your file, rake you over the coals for a few months and fire you individually. It looks great. In my case, my supervisor made sure he nailed me on my birthday. Another great and integral part of rank and yank is bonus incentives for those not fired. The company was talking about bonuses as high as 15%, knowing they could split the salaries of the people they planned to fire. It's strange how no one but supervisors were excited about that.

    Look forward to getting the usual communist propaganda from the company by mail for a while. The idiots in HR sent me a big fat glossy book, personalized with my own numbers, about what great benefits the company has for it's employees. The only thing they missed in the personalization was the fact that I was fired. How sofisticated, the company really loves me.

    My company was big, but Time/Warner is much bigger. I wonder if the Netscape people are going to have it that much worse than I did. Nah, it's hard to get worse than fired, no matter how the jack-asses dress it up.

    Welcome to the great suck that is the "recovery". I've been out of real work for more than a year. I'm not really happy to have lots of company.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:ho, ho, ho by JeffFurry · · Score: 2, Funny
      twitter wrote:
      Look forward to getting the usual communist propaganda from the company by mail for a while.
      Having recently been 'downsized' as well, and seeing all the outsourcing, offshoring, and dissolving of jobs, I have to point out that it's CAPITALIST propaganda. They're doing it for the money. Executive/management money, and shareholder money. It lets them keep the cost down, which keeps the profit up, and more profit means more money for them!

      That's the way that corporate america works. Management is #1, shareholders are #2, customers and employees are a necessary evil, and should be disposed of as soon as possible.

    2. Re:ho, ho, ho by prescot6 · · Score: 1

      my supervisor made sure he nailed me on my birthday

      Most people would appreciate getting nailed on their birthdays.

    3. Re:ho, ho, ho by jafac · · Score: 1

      I was also "ranked and yanked" (at a very large software company).

      We had a re-org, and after several years under a good manager, who was promoted up the chain, I was moved from being a player on a successful team, to a different team, with a manager in a different office 3000 miles away - this office was formerly a competitor our parent company bought.

      Basically, my new manager had me filed under "expendible" for about a year before it happened.

      You can just tell these things by how appointments are kept, and how fast equipment comes. I wasn't feeling the love, that's for sure. She was waiting for an excuse, any excuse to get rid of her most experienced, and highest-paid team member, who was a pain in the ass to her little empire. Well, sooner or later, in my profession (support) you run into a disgruntled customer. No matter how good you are, you just can't make some people happy - and sometimes you're fighting a team effort, and sometimes YOU, as the customer's point of contact, get blamed when they're frustrated. And that was all the excuse my boss needed to get rid of the one person that was a threat to her job.

      I was VERY fortunate to have found work in the space of about 30 days. But I've taken a huge pay cut - and I'm very near the end of my rope, because my savings are now gone, and it looks like I'm not going to be able to continue making my house payments - so I'm probably going to be forced to move.

      This recovery is AS fake as the "WMD evidence".

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:ho, ho, ho by jafac · · Score: 1

      "Management is #1, shareholders are #2, customers and employees are a necessary evil, and should be disposed of as soon as possible"

      Funny how these guys call themselve's "Supply-siders" as far as economic theory goes. They're all for strengthening the stake in the supply side of the economy. Except when it comes to the Labor Supply. . . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  25. Re:winamp 3 sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    So I can listen to my CDs in 1/10th the time. Cool!

  26. No suprise by Lipongo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I for one was expecting this. Considering that earlier in the year AOL Time Warner decided to change its name back to just Time Warner. It is common knowledge that they have been losing thier clients to other ISP services like MSN and Comcast. When your user base shrinks the company must as well to keep from losing to much money on having to large of a workforce for thier userbase.

    --
    -Certified TechnoWeinie
  27. Re:Winamp's Time is Over by andih8u · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, not everyone uses linux. Winamp was for a long time the best media player for windows. It was light-weight and robust...it did what is was supposed to well and didn't try to take on lots of other functions (ala winamp3.) Hopefully the XMMS dev team will get some strays and release a nice windows port.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  28. Winamp 5 pwns Winamp 3 by SuperMo0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From what I heard AOL rushed out the release of Winamp 3, which is why it was such a piece of shit. But the Winamp 5 Beta RC 10 seems to have combined the few redeeming features of Winamp 3 with the functionality and non memory whoringness of Winamp 2....while being compatible with plugins and skins from both versions.

  29. Outsourcing by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Well its not suprising. I'm just expecting an announcement in the next couple of days that they are outsouring themselves to India

    Rus

  30. Re:Someone please save WinAmp!!! by metallikop · · Score: 1

    If you read the winamp forums this isn't their whole team that's going away. Two of the guys that were 'let go' were the lead developers for Winamp3. From my take on it, they're still working on 5.
    Read up here

  31. Re:AOL Winamp/Netscape by eibhear · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I remember the glory days of NS, back before IE was even a player on the market.

    So do I. Though only as an event in history. Netscape Communicator is gone. Dead. Arising from its ashes, however, is a top class browser that leaves netscape communicator and internet explorer coughing in its dust. Let go of netscape. AOL had no problem doing so.

    ibhear

  32. No, no, no, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's: Winamp, it is really whipping the elephant's ass!

    1. Re:No, no, no, by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Funny

      ....and Thank You Please for Coming Again!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:No, no, no, by alexpage · · Score: 1

      If you're coming again after whipping an elephant's arse, there's something deeply wrong with you.

  33. oh tell me tell me tell me by segment · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somebody tell me that little icon fscker running man was included in those layoffs, and also will some of their users be laid off ...

    source http://www.antioffline.com/aolstory.html

    Confident with the US government's standing on its purchases, AOL announced today they will purchase themselves in a hostile takeover move in an effort to ensure they don't compete with themselves.

    Time Warner an AOL subsidiary backed AOL's decision with the company's spokesperson stating "We as a company are please to announce that customers will have the ability to choose between AOL and the new line of products titled XAOL which simply translates to eXtended AOL which will feature more robust happy face icons with a slightly higher 102 megabyte overhead of icons and sounds.

    "In addition we are now ceasing the abilities of hackers by bundling XAOL with the latest in our very own firewall which features will include packet filtering, AOHell punters for our chatters, and SpamGod v.1 for our users who send bulk mail."

    As for the takeover plans include an overhaul of the technical support group which will now have mandatory classes at Romper Room and a new set of AOL for Dummies, Internet for Idiots in 21 days for Dummies, and The Internet Who'd of Thunk it, books in order to facilitate their skills.

    "Customers will also have new screen names to keep up to date with the changes of the net, so a user named billybob will have all aliases associated with that name to keep AOL as hip as ever. BiLLyBoB, xXxBiLLyBoBxXx, b1llyb0b, are some of the combinations available at this time." states Justin Case CTO Operations.

    Along with these added new functionalities in AOL, monopolies will be built around Time Warner's existing empire and the entire cast of the WB's popular will fill chat rooms from 6-9pm and the cast of Buffy the Vampire Slayer will also join popular chatroom channels such as DesperateAndDumbHousewives.

    Investors are delighted to this deal and are pouring millions of dollars into this new venture in hopes of someday being able to interpret anything related to technology. "As long as its on the Internet it must be profitable, so we filled out portfolios and dumped our life savings into this wonderful idea."

    Phil McGroin analyst Meryll Lurch

  34. Winamp 3 shelved by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Informative
    Interesting quote from Russ on the winamp forum:
    How about "never". The official line is that Winamp3 development is now stopped. Shelved. At least temporarily. And here I am sitting here trying to look optimistic. It's not "soon" any more, it's "maybe".

    The golden rule of customer service is: Give the customer what they want. The customer didn't want Winamp3, that much is clear. The customer didn't care about the most powerful API this side of, well, anything. They didn't care about platform independence. The average Winamp user is only vaguely aware of what Linux is, let alone how to use it. Much less than 1% of Winamp users want Linux support.

    Find it here.

    Personally I don't want Winamp 3 because every version I tried was horribly unstable and I had to end up uninstalling it. The only really cool thing about it was the media library and that ended up in 2.x. So, I never saw any need to migrate.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by RussGarrett · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmm, that'd be me. Being rather melodramatic.

      I was rather more optimistic about things until yesterday. Most of Winamp3 is now open-sourced (except the skinning and scripting engine), and there are people working on a fully open-source version of Winamp3, now known as wasabi.player (and much improved since the old, old release which is still on the winamp.com frontpage).

    2. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by SuperMo0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My problem with Winamp3 was that for the longest time, it would pop up 6 or 7 error boxes that I'd haev to click OK on to get it to work. That and it was a total memory whore.

    3. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by lennart78 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the past I've seen some pretty neat things that could be done within winamp(2) visualisation. Somebody even managed to program a 3d-rendered asteroids game in it. It's not really usefull, but it warms my geek-heart to see a product with such versatility.

      However: the bottom line is: I've always regarded winamp as a software mp3-player. And when I double-click an mp3, I want to hear it instantly, and not wait around for something like 10 seconds on a PC with recent hard and software for the music to start.

      It's cool if it's got lot's of features, but it should at least do that for which it was designed/intended. Winamp3 failed it, so I switched to an alternative, and many more with me for as far as I know. Complies with the qoute above it seems...
      Too bad for winamp. Really liked it so far...

    4. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by supabeast! · · Score: 0

      "Personally I don't want Winamp 3 because every version I tried was horribly unstable and I had to end up uninstalling it."

      I second the motion. Winamp 3 is a cranky little bitch, performance sucks, and the sound quality of Winamp playback is terrible. Long live iTunes, xmms, mplayer, etc..

    5. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by Ciderx · · Score: 1

      A lot less people will be working on it if the authorities start to notice the death threats made in that thread.

    6. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      foobar2000 baby, if you want a player to play rather than look like whore's dresser.

    7. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by Spydr · · Score: 1

      has nobody tried out winamp 5?

      there are a few betas floating around... i think RC10 was just released last week...

      it's pretty nice - apparently it was the lightweightedness of winamp 2 and the skin/cool stuff of winamp 3... 2+3=5, get it?

      i was using it for a while and didn't find any bugs or anything...

      on the other hand, winamp 3 was just a big pile of poo. crashing every other hour, and hogging all my precious memory.

    8. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

      Heh... combine Wasabi with xmms... problem solved. ;)

    9. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by Symbiosis · · Score: 1
      In the sake of fairness, you should also include this quote from further down the thread, also by Russ:

      I hope to announce some significant progress in this area quite shortly. I'm now much more optimistic than I was when I last posted.

      In short: Winamp3 will not be going away any time soon .
      :-p
      --

      -------------------------------------------
      I like nonsense, it wakes up the brain cells.
      -- Dr. Seuss
    10. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      The only really cool thing about it was the media library and that ended up in 2.x

      I run winamp 3 now and I like the way the playlist window has two frames, one with current playlist and one with a list of playlists (most of which are albums, for me). I find this really convenient. Is there a way to do this in winamp 2? I haven't used it in a while. Unless, this is the "media library" you refer to, but I don't think so. Also, does winamp 2 support all of the video formats that 3 does? It didn't when I used to use it, but I could imagine that it might now.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
  35. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XMMS is technically a competitor of winamp that stole its look and feel. I would bet that all of the developers on winamp would sacrifically kill themselves before joining the xmms team.

    Nothing against xmms... but... pride in "your" code is what pushes a lot of development. I would see them re-creating a new player first. Also, they probably signed a non-compete clause in the first place. They are probably forbidden to write media players other than AOL related.

  36. America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For real.. Show you "buy american" spirit and protest or cancel your accounts or get your family switched off aol.

    Doesn't is PISS YOU OFF that not only are these workers being layed off and jobs being transfered out of america, but they continue to jack up prices, restrict service and push cheasy upgrades as major features. On top of that, how can any company keep the word AMERICA in its title and start transfering jobs overseas.

    The ISP land is already a joke. You can pickup AS5200's, Ascend Maxen and other terminal servers with high port densities for pennies on the dollar.. i know it certainly isn't IT expenses infringing on profits..

    Why don't they quit spending out millions of wastefull cd's and pushing stupid commercials..

    Is america litterly going to shop itself out of existance with a blind eye towards supporting our own economy and local jobs?

    1. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by tomblackwell · · Score: 0

      You should learn what "commoditization" means.

      Why not complain about the textile jobs lost to foreign countries? Are you wearing clothing made in the USA?

      Why not complain about the fact that you can't buy american-made gasoline?

      The truth is that, over time, certain products become cheaper or more expensive as they become easier or harder to provide. You have to get a grip and get used to this.

      Consider McDonalds. If you go in, you can take a napkin for free. 300 years ago, a napkin was a much more valuable thing. They wouldn't give them away. Somewhere along the line, it became easy enough to make them that they lost their value. The same thing is happening in the computer software and support industry. If someone can do it as well (the tough part) and more cheaply, than they will have a market. The napkin makers got over it. So should you.

    2. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The napkin makers got over it. So should you.

      The problem with your analogy is that the napkin makers still get paid. McDonald's pays napkin makers so that a McDonald's customers can have free napkins. And more likely then compared to textiles and gasoline, napkins are probably made in America, which puts money back into Americans pockets.

      The main issue with more and more industries going overseas for workers is that less money is being given to the American public, yet people are still in the constant-consuming mindset. And they are going into debt over it, so that they can have that nice car and the big projection TV and the cell phone. Just like all the commercials tell them they deserve.

      Although the tech industry has really brought this upon themselves during the boom. I recently read an article (saw the link on Fark, too lazy to look it up) about a guy who started a consultant company. While looking for workers he decided to try something novel (to him and most tech workers it seems, but not to someone like me who's lived this). He decided to offer positions for the same wages that Indian programmers are offered: $45,000 a year. Being a Canadian who hasn't bothered with looking for work in the US, I was personally shocked by this. If the only reason US tech workers aren't finding jobs is because no one is willing to offer a good wage (not extraordinary, buy-me-a-Lexus-and-an-SUV kind of wages, but good enough to live modestly), then I feel no pity for companies at all. The guy who offered those wages was flooded with resumes. People are obviously willing to work, despite not having the huge paychecks. But they have to be given the chance. Companies have to realise the value of hiring locally at fair wages.

      Now as for textiles...everyone but the main "Promotional" companies (i.e. Nike, etc) is getting screwed on that deal. People really should be upset over that entire industry...

    3. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Show you "buy american" spirit and protest or cancel your accounts or get your family switched off aol.

      If you do this with alot of things you buy you almost will buy nothing.

      Take a cellphone. Where was assembled? Where were the parts made? Where is the head/design/engineering office?

      Its getting hard to not buy a true domestic technological product these days.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should read the book "No Logo" by Naomi Klein. This sort of thing has been going on for a long time (hello, sweatshops?).

      Wall Street is likely to frown upon companies who _aren't_ outsourcing to somewhere where they can pay the workers fuck all.

    5. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's global capitalism for you. National or ethnic loyalties disapear in the interests of infinite growth. A stagnant business in a capitalist economy is a dead one; even if it is pulling in huge profits- if it isn't growing it's dead. Like a shark, which moves just to stay alive. More and more businesses will be pulling more and more off-shore stunts- after all, when they have a market saturated you have to find new profits, new growth somewhere.

      Global capitalism and corporate wellfare are a very bad combo for everyone else but the stockholders.

      There has got to be a better way.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    6. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 1

      Ascend MAX, or Lucent TNTs or whatever are dead cheap now.

      As an ex dial engineer from a v.large telco I can tell you that the boxes themselves aren't the cost of running these services - it's the E1s that you have to rent to hook them up. They cost shit loads per month and the provisioning is dead difficult.

      Anyways, regarding the overseas stuff, what do you expect ? AOL is a business and due to the shareholders wanting the most $$$ they can get their hands on, they are just doing the most profitable.

      There are parallels with industry - in the UK for example our industry has all but gone - because people in Taiwan and elsewhere can just produce it a whole lot cheaper. However the point is that we diversified and that is what the US has to do. (Currently the UK has the best growth rates in the G7) If these jobs can be done elsewhere cheaper, so be it . Just make sure that you diversify. Anyways, the most of the jobs that have been moved overseas are normally call acceptance etc and those jobs suck royally anyways ;)

      --
      tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
    7. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      Time Warner owns a pretty major backbone and has some cloute with telecoms. You can bet your sweet peas that they're not paying the same rate for T1/PRI's that you and i would pay or any small non fortune 500 player.

      But yeat, equipment is so cheap, it isn't it costs or component infrastructure. But they do have inroads into there own backbone, network and telecom infrastructure in several major metropolitin areas.

    8. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by los+furtive · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You got it right on the nose! "Buy American" crap is just racist protectionism. When a job goes to India, it still goes to a human being, and one who currently doesn't get to live the bloated American lifestyle. If Americans (in general) didn't have the need to lead such bloated lifestyles, they could get by on a lower salary, which would allow the company to keep its employees in its own country.

      Jobs going overseas allows other people a chance to own houses, computers, cars and televisions, but more importantly allows more tax money to go back into their own economy, which is then reinvested so that water can be treated and delivered to where it is needed, infrastructure put in place for better markets, better medical aid, better roads. "Buy American" is a great ideal, but it's far far from the trade deficite truth Americans live in. unless Americans are willing to do the same work for a lot less, it's not going to change, and that won't happen until Americans curb their appetites for just about everything. Mark my words, unless there is some incredible breakthrough in technology, the excess we currently live in wont last much longer, or will become available to fewer and fewer people, as the dichotomy of classes increase.

      As a side note to my second paragraph, I wonder if its accidental that the US arms race, as well as its pressure on other countries to increase their military might, is not just to make sure that less money goes into infrastructure that would make those countries a better place. But thats a whole other ball of wax.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    9. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

      > Is america litterly going to shop itself out of existance with a blind eye towards supporting our own economy and local jobs?

      Of course not... it's taxing it's biggest job providers to death... in the name of helping the needy.

    10. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Can you please explain to me how I am having a bloated lifestyle with a technical lead job in Silicon Valley. I have an appartment, a car and Ok a couple of luxary items (a Mac, an iPod and a PS2 - Microsoft Free Home (TM)). I would be willing to give up all but the first one if I lived in a city with a decent subway, low crime and good night life. Say, like Taipei from what I saw when I visited.

      You might want to try again. Blame a screwed currency exchange rate for example.

    11. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the car. There are plenty of cities in america with relatively low crime rates and a subway system. It is the car that is the ultimate evil. You could pay for all your luxuries many times over, with the cost of the car for just 1 year

    12. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by BluedemonX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, there's part of me that just shakes his head and chuckles at the whole thing. They no longer BUILD anything, and now they want to get out of the business of DESIGNING things, they just want to employ about four rich fat cats to MARKET and CEO the damn things.

      Yet, at the same time, they're sending their militaries all over the place to stomp people and assert American testosterological might.

      However, I see a parallel to all this. Any of you seen Gone With the Wind? The part where the Southern gentlemen just come to learn that the Yankees want to take their mint-juleps-on-the-porch-while-the-slaves-work lifestyle away from em and vow to fight? And Rhett "Common Sense" Butler says, simply, "dudes, you have no armouries, no cannon-making forges, no mining, no resources except for cotton and slaves. You import everything like that from the North. And they'll stop selling it to you the moment war is declared. This is a fool's game." And the Southerners refuse to listen and get slaughtered.

      Well, fast forward thirty years. The North is China. The South is the CEO class. The slaves are the poor hillbilly remnants of the once prosperous middle class. And when China makes a move that the USA CEO class finally is uncomfortable with, they'll find out too late that the modern equivalent of cotton and slaves, marketing and entertainment, can't be used to eat, build, heal or fight with.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    13. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by djlowe · · Score: 1
      Of course not... it's taxing it's biggest job providers to death...


      Beg pardon, but that isn't true.

      This link: http://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/trends/current/incomeT ax1910_presG.html

      shows the trend of corporate vs. individual taxes, and clearly shows that corporations are paying less each year, while the tax burden on the individual increases.

      I hardly think that corporations are being "taxed to death", although the individuals are...

      Regards,

      dj

    14. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      You might want to try again. Blame a screwed currency exchange rate for example.

      I'd rather not. It is generaly agreed that the U.S. dollar is overvalued (of note, the pdf ends by saying that "overvalued" doesn't mean much when private market forces hold sway and the government doesn't intervene...but check out what G.W. Bush has been doing as of late.)

      As for the bloated lifestyle, I would like to ask you the following: how much do you spend a year on cable, satelite, cellphone, laundry services, fuel, restaurants, computer games, music, clothes, electronics. That list isn't all encompassing, its just to give you an idea.

      Next, tell me how much on average how much do you spend on a new shirt? On a pair of shoes? On a tie? On sunglasses? How much did you spend on your SUV (yes, I'm assuming here, but don't forget in my original post I said Americans (in general)).

      Do you see where I'm getting at? Now contrast this to a country like Russian, which person for person could more or less get any given US job done just as well. How much do they own? How much do they spend for one shirt (hint, as a rule of thumb, they ain't buying polo and hilfigger)? Ok, then turn it up a notch and think India, think China!

      That is what I was talking about when I refered to bloat.

      Fact is, this shit has already happened (think Canada!) and its only a matter of time till it happens on a grander scale (and if you're saying "it happened to Canada and we're fine, so what?" don't forget that Canada only has 30,000,000 people, and its own economic sectors to keep them busy, all the other countries I've listed have significantly more people, and not necessarily other economic sectors to fall back on, which makes them more eager to take yours).

      I'm starting to ramble a bit but what I'm still saying is unless Americans cut back you won't be able to stop this from happening. If you still don't understand what I mean by now, then unfortunately you are one of the masses who doesn't realise not just how good they've got it, but how excessive they've got it as well.

      A downturn in the economy (think black monday 1929 + drought) would seriously change your response to the questions I asked above. What if that downturn was spawned by an exoduse of jobs from the US, and the crash of an overinflated U.S. dollar? And since the US has a massive trade deficite, if its dollar lost a significant amount of its value, wouldn't that affect its purchasing power? Do you think you'd still own/enjoy the things you do right now?

      Oh, and one final note. Although I don't expect the above to happen tomorrow, has it occured to you that the reason you don't hear about this sort of stuff in the media, is because they have a vested interest in not alarming/letting you know? That's right, just keep giving them your money so that when the time does come, they have a pillow to fall on. What will you fall on?

      Although my arguments may not be entirely right or convincing, I hope they gave you though, and I hope you at least now see where I'm coming from.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    15. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      You could pay for all your luxuries many times over, with the cost of the car for just 1 year

      True dat.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    16. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by zbuffered · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's also the iPod, the mac, and the PS2. And the TV, and the games for #2 and #3, and the music CDs, and the 2x a week you drop $60 on dinner for you and your SO, and insurance for your car/apt/health/life/cat, and TAXES.

      It's not just the car, although that's a good percentage of it. It's the American lifestyle. It's a trap. Don't fall for it. If you work for a living, you become a slave. Not to the company you work for, you become a slave to your paycheck. It's tempting to spend your paycheck on all these little niceties, but if you spend that paycheck tomorrow, you'll be spending your paycheck for the rest of your life. If you do, then that's fine, but recognize that some people make ends meet with far less money. It's a lifestyle thing though. If you're stuck in it, and you're not happy, then change.

      If you want to spend less money, itemize everything you pay money for in a month, and realize that you could ELIMINATE 95% of it if you absolutely had to. People do. Not that you should, but you could. And if you did, even for a couple of months, you'd probably realize that it's not too bad, and that if you're going to spend your life working, you'd better have something more to show for it than enough money for an iPod and to pay the bills. Because if that's all you have, then WTF are you doing it all for?

      I suspect it's because you don't know another way. It's the American lifestyle. It's a trap.

      There are other ways.

      .

      And as for the subway system, there are plenty of cities in America that are perfectly accessible by bicycle and bus (you can put your bike on the bus, you know). Or if you live too far from work, buy a scooter, pay $20/year for liability insurance, and enjoy the 60MPG you get. Parking's easy too.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    17. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL has a call center presence in India, they have for a couple years now. They are not moving their "internal support" staff to India. Nice try though.

      They reduced developer headcount, as a result, they had to reduce support headcount. Less people to support, less people needed to do it.

    18. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by donutello · · Score: 1

      I agree with you except for calling the American lifestyle "bloated". Apart from the wastefulness of limited resources - oil, garbage, etc which is a wholly separate issue - there is nothing "bloated" or excessive about the American lifestyle. Rather, it is the lifestyle in the other countries that is minimalist. The trade deficit is inevitable while disparities in lifestyles persist but the solution is not to bring down the American lifestyle but to raise the lifestyle in other countries - which is slowly happening.

      Economis is not a zero-sum game. Wealth can be created. Using technology and outsourcing does not have to imply a reduction in lifestyle quality since those human resources are now freed to work on presumably higher and more productive tasks. Take for example, the use of powertools in the construction industry. When they were first introduced, there were fears of wide-spread unemployment and the consequent economic downturn. Rather, the fact that we can now use an excavator to haul the dirt out means people are not working on a hard, shitty job which has minimial economic value (compared to a machine doing the same job) and are doing something else instead.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    19. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 1
      If you want to spend less money, itemize everything you pay money for in a month, and realize that you could ELIMINATE 95% of it if you absolutely had to.
      Anyone who that applies to still lives with their parents.

      Sounds like you've watched Fightclub way too many times.
    20. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by rupert2000 · · Score: 1

      The quality of life factor in the equation is dwarfed by the difference in cost of living between India and the US. What would be considered a poor salary in the US could be an extremely luxurious income in India. For a country, having relatively lower or relatively higher cost of living both have their advandages and disadvantages. It is a complicated issue that is bigger than workers quality of life preferences.

    21. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      I don't think this was any more offtopic than the other posts in reply to the original, so i guess someone just doesnt want to respond to the correction made.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    22. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you havent watched it enough. i did as he said. removed i would say 50% of my expenses after itemizeing them. what you own, ends up owning you.

    23. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by zvar · · Score: 1

      If you do this with alot of things you buy you almost will buy nothing.
      Take a cellphone. Where was assembled? Where were the parts made? Where is the head/design/engineering office?


      Well, if it's a Nokia then it was made in Keller, TX, (Outside Ft. Worth) the parts are shiped from all over including the Motorola factory in Haltom, TX (again, outside Ft. Worth) their main / design office is in Irving, TX (Outside Dallas).
      Yes this is likely just for the American phones, but just because a product has a name of Nokia, Samsung, Sony, etc dosn't mean its made outside of the states. Of course on the same token just because it has the name Ford, DuPont, GM, etc.. dosn't mean it's made in the states either.

    24. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      You got it right on the nose! "Buy American" crap is just racist protectionism. When a job goes to India, it still goes to a human being, and one who currently doesn't get to live the bloated American lifestyle. If Americans (in general) didn't have the need to lead such bloated lifestyles, they could get by on a lower salary, which would allow the company to keep its employees in its own country.

      It boils down to two words. Corporate greed. Companies aren't exactly struggling. They trying to maxmize profit. They don't care about producing the best product or even making the most money in the long term. They care about stock prices.

      Look, I'm willing to put in long hours if necessary. I just want some loyalty and fair compensation. I'm not a slave or a tool. I guess in reality I am...

      I can deal with corporate greed, but I can't deal with people telling me I should be happy with a modest lifestyle. How wrong I am for wanting some corporate loyalty. I want to be paid fairly. I don't expect dot com wages. However, I'd like to think that if I can do my job well, I won't get screwed. The thing I've learned is that you should work for yourself.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    25. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Well, first of all I had a good laugh, because I came from Russia and my girlfriend is from China. Believe me, software engineers do eat out as well as buy music and cloth in both places. I should also note that I am driving a New Beetle which is not an SUV, don't have cable or satelite and buy cloth in Costo whenever I can.

      Now, my rent fee is $1175, for a smaller appartment that I had almost for free in Russia. But what can I do about that? Not many appartments allow cats and if I pay $700 anywhere in Bay Area I would probably need to buy a gun for self defence. Should I really worry about 4 PS2 games per year for a total of $200 then?

      I should also mention that I was severly harassed by government and high crime level in Russia and will not go back just to keep a programming job. But I also would love to keep the line of work that I enjoy. Any more tips to trim my bloated lifestyle so that I can compete with Indians?

    26. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by cdsatl · · Score: 1

      America Online already offshores. Indian programmers in India don't make $45,000, try $7,000-10,000 maybe. The U.S. companies who are offshoring THINK they're getting workers at 10% of the U. S. salary. However, if you read about what's going on, these companies, and their European counterparts, are savig 20-25% of the U. S. (or European) employee's salaries while allowing the expertise, privacy and secutiry of their products leave the country. See www.onshorealternatives.com

  37. and the dawn of the foobar2000 era? by real_smiff · · Score: 1

    Perhaps; that seems to be where it's at. Windows only (hey, like >90% of computer users!), but excellent. Can't comment on XAMP, never heard of it! (probably what most of you are saying about foobar?). I agree with you that Winamp's time is over, but it takes a long time for most people to move on - WA is/was an incredibly well penetrated (can i use the verb like that?) product. It's still synonymous with MP3s and 'computer music' to many people. They might just be using it for as long as it works on their OS.

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    1. Re:and the dawn of the foobar2000 era? by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 0

      so what does foobar have that winamp doesnt? for now, i see no reason to switch. winamp doesnt crash on me (ever), it looks pretty enough with the skins available for wa3, and its easy to use. so what makes foobar better? ill switch if it is indeed superior.

    2. Re:and the dawn of the foobar2000 era? by kashmirzoso · · Score: 1

      I actually switched from Winamp 2.x to Foobar. Never thought I would. I think the best feature of Foobar is its ID3 Tag Renamer. Worth a look..I still use Winamp 2.x at work, but Foobar at home :)

  38. I'm not surprised. AOL will ultimately fall. by BrentRJones · · Score: 1

    Netzero and Juno are fine for dial up. If they had placed as many CD-ROMs at Blockbuster and Best Buy they would have almost all the AOL customers by now. Broadband will eventually pound the last nail in the AOL coffin. I sure hope it gets cheaper. My comcast is $47 / month.

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  39. Rather than laying off people by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
    Why don't they cut their advertising and high budget Matrix/Mission Impossible TV commercials?

    Do we really need to see the Yellow Guy?

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  40. Let the comedy stylings commence! by Channard · · Score: 3, Funny
    Cue the inevitable gags -

    'You've got dole!'

    'You've got a P45.'

    'You've got food stamps!'

    . Any more? I suspect said ex-employees will be finding out if you can build a house out of AOL cds.

    1. Re:Let the comedy stylings commence! by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about...
      "YOU'VE GOT NO MORTGAGE PAYMENT!"
      "YOU'VE GOT NO CHRISTMAS!"
      and my personal favorite, since being laid off myself last Tuesday...
      "YOU'VE GOT NO REASON TO LIVE!"

      --
      Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
      -- Cicero
    2. Re:Let the comedy stylings commence! by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      "Spot the Brit?"

      What is the American equivalent to "getting your P45[*]"?

      Tiggs

      [*]
      Bit of paper you get when leaving a job.
      In this case, sommat to do with your tax record.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    3. Re:Let the comedy stylings commence! by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      What is the American equivalent to "getting your P45[*]"?

      The expression is "pink slip", although the line between "laid off" and "fired" has blurred considerably, they're not all pink anymore, and the system by which you register for/draw unemployment pay is pretty different.

      In essence, getting the boot in the US = "you better have some cash on the side."
      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    4. Re:Let the comedy stylings commence! by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

      We all need to cut back on tying up so much of our identities with our jobs. Our jobs should not be our reason to live.

    5. Re:Let the comedy stylings commence! by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Wow, great, I think I'll start becoming a Breatharian right now!

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  41. i'm not sure by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    what version you are using, but i've been using xmms for greater than a month, and havn't had any problems with it.
    granted, i havn't heard anything above 192kbs so mabye in the high ranges things go to hell, but over all it's a great system. and i've been using the version that comes with Debian --stable.
    mabye your soundcard just sucks?

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:i'm not sure by vrai · · Score: 1
      I'm using xmms version 1.2.8 (compiled by blastwave.org) and it runs fine - I haven't had a crash for over a year (though most of that time was with 1.2.7). Most of my CD rips are in VBR (averaging around 256Kb/s) but I have some encoded at 320Kb/s - they all sound good and play without any problems, even on my old 360Mhz Ultra 5. I also run it on a PIII and a 1700XP (both running SuSE 8.2), all of them work perfectly.

      If people are having problems then it's likely to be their system that's at fault - not xmms.

  42. identities by themusicgod1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that's what being anonymous on the net is all about.

    IHATEAOL69 and AOLSUCKSCOCK3 could join the xmms team, and so long as they stayed that way, i don't think anyone would care, as long as the software worked.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  43. Re:WinAmp, eh? by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

    Totem for me, thanks.

    There's nothing wrong with choice, variety being the spice of life and all. I personally use(d) WinAMP in Windows because I could feed it a directory of tunes and it would parse and play them for me, complete with pattern searching and sorting by genre (like iTunes). Find me an mp3 player in Linux that does that and I'll marry it. Yes, I'm familiar with Rhythmbox, but I'd like something a little more mature if you don't mind.

  44. America Online - No Carrier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Consider McDonalds. If you go in, you can take a napkin for free. 300 years ago, a napkin was a much more valuable thing. They wouldn't give them away. Somewhere along the line, it became easy enough to make them that they lost their value. The same thing is happening in the computer software and support industry. If someone can do it as well (the tough part) and more cheaply, than they will have a market. The napkin makers got over it. So should you."

    Well it's nice to hear you're taking the unemployment line with such good grace. The present situation is more than just "outmoded and gotta go", although that's a common refrain from those who get their news from CNN, and Time magazine. I suggest you look a little deeper.

  45. Arizona Sites Also... by malelder · · Score: 3, Informative

    They have also layed off people at their Tucson, Arizona support site...so that should be up to about 2.2% of their work force. So you AOL'ers have a longer wait time on hold for your 7 minutes of support now (;

    --


    Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
  46. Justin has been gone for a while by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't Justin leave several months ago? Slashdot says he did!

    1. Re:Justin has been gone for a while by puck71 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, he's still around for now. http://www.winamp.com/team/finger.jhtml?who=Justin : "June 21 2003 @ 12:10pm Been back for a while now, got all the work stuff sorted out. I'm at least content now to get Winamp 5 out, we'll see how it all goes from there."

    2. Re:Justin has been gone for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fscking cunt. I hope you are pentrated by 100 hairy penises by the time you die a slow and painful death!

    3. Re:Justin has been gone for a while by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link! You are correct.

    4. Re:Justin has been gone for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      finger Mike@landoleet.org Login: mike Name: Mike The Llama No Mail. Plan: 12.9.03

      Astounding. Worst episode ever.

      The most depressing thing I've ever witnessed at this company occured today. In the midst of layoffs today our local IC tech was forced to come in and collect PCs of the recently released, in spite of the fact that his grandmother's funeral was this morning.

      It's the single most depressing event I've witnessed to date here. That's saying something. My mind cannot dream up anything more callous and thoughtless.

    5. Re:Justin has been gone for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Winamp 5?!?! Maybe they should finish 3 first.

  47. severance Package by pvt_medic · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope that their layoff comes with a nice deal, like maybe getting an AOL CD in the mail.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
    1. Re:severance Package by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if their employees will keep calling them back every week telling them that things have improved and to prove it they're going to offer to work 45 days free.

    2. Re:severance Package by dws · · Score: 1

      The AOL CD was included in the exit packet. Two months of free service was part of the severance package.

  48. too much holiday egg nog for you by segment · · Score: 1

    How sofisticated, the company really loves me Ever think they could have fired you for your spelling? I've been out of real work for more than a year. I'm not really happy to have lots of company. Or your cheery outlook? Get a grip and go to Dice I get calls and offers all the time via Dice and Hotjobs and haven't had my resume listed their in eons.

    1. Re:too much holiday egg nog for you by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      ...haven't had my resume listed their in eons. It's obviously not because of your spelling.

      :-)

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    2. Re:too much holiday egg nog for you by segment · · Score: 1

      ncie catch (:

  49. Re:shit head. by kiwimate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh grow up. You're putting words into my mouth that are utterly without basis from what I posted. I think any job loss is bad news, and 450 is really distressing. I've been in situations where I've put my shirt on the line for a company I believed in and, in some cases, just wriggled through, and, in other cases, paid the price with my job. And, hey, guess what? In one of those cases I was the sole programmer at a company that ended up struggling and decided to cut me loose first.

    If you read my direct quotation of the 2% figure as being somehow trivializing, then you're deliberately trying to spin it. 2% of a company's workforce is, to me, fairly substantial. Getting rid of innovative people such as the undisputedly talented programmers under discussion here is a very real and serious action.

    Looking at your other post on this topic, it looks like you've got a chip on your shoulder, but it's certainly justifiable. Unlike you, I'm not going to wish you ill or gloat, because I've been there and know how much it sucks, and it's just not worth it to spread the bitterness. I really do hope you find a job soon.

  50. Globalization by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    There is no problem with my comment. Offshore coders get paid. Napkin makers get paid. Those who make commodities get paid, but margins are slimmer than for items that take more skill to make.

    If you are in a market which is being commoditized, you can't expect:
    a) to make a lot of money
    b) that people in other countries won't compete with you

    All of these products are bought and sold by people who have learned to survive within the tough commodity market. The way to survive there is to keep costs low. If the US prices itself out of that market, it should either cut its costs or chase after a newer, more lucrative market.

  51. Re:Someone please save WinAmp!!! by The_Unforgiven · · Score: 0

    Sorry if this is stupid, but Winamp 5? What happened to winamp 4?

    --
    http://wsulug.org
  52. AOL broadband. by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your exatly right. Around here its a standard roadrunner connection and has all the crap expected from dialup aol, thier software, startpages, 'content' etc. Oh, and it costs $10 more a month than standard roadrunner.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  53. Re:Winamp's Time is Over by Seby123456 · · Score: 1

    All I want to know is... when is Sonique V.2 going to be finished, and is it going to suffer from the horrible syndrome of trying to be a general video/media player instead of simply an audioplayer which killed Winamp for me?

  54. Ah, sensative HR departments by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The idiots in HR sent me a big fat glossy book, personalized with my own numbers, about what great benefits the company has for it's employees. The only thing they missed in the personalization was the fact that I was fired. How sofisticated, the company really loves me.

    That sounds sadly typical of the people who work in HR departments. A few years ago, my mom was laid off from an insurance company after they decided to close the office she worked at. Several days later, they called her at home to do an exit interview, and one of the questions they asked was "why did you leave this position?" - which made her start crying.

    Come to think of it, this was just after Christmas - I was home at the time on Christmas break from college. The timing may have been more a fiscal calender that conincided with the calender year, but it still seemed kind of harsh.

    1. Re:Ah, sensative HR departments by Loraque · · Score: 1

      What everyone fails to realize here, is that HR stands for Heinous Rape-age.

      I just wish they would call that department what its real function is-

      CCA- Cover Corporate Asses Department
      LTE- Lie To Employees Department
      PTH- Pretend to be Helpful Department

  55. Mozilla going strong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, be realistic. Mozilla (as weel as Firebird) are both truely excellent products. I use them all the time.
    But Mozilla isn't going that strong... Unfortunately, IE is still the (very) dominant browser, with a huge market share.
    Juts like everyone here, I would love to see many more use Mozilla but as for now, it remains a dream

  56. What the people who fired you did. by twitter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This just in - the power lunch is back. A close example from that article:

    Over at the Four Seasons, events of some significance are on the menu along with the white truffle risotto ($130 for an appetizer portion) and grilled dorade. On Nov. 20, Edgar Bronfman Jr. and Roger Ames spent a good long while chatting amiably with heads bent toward each other while other captains of industry, including Ronald O. Perelman, Steven Rattner and Ronald S. Lauder, casually took in the significance of the pairing. A few days later, Warner Music, of which Mr. Ames is chairman, was sold to a group headed by Mr. Bronfman for $2.6 billion, which sort of puts the price of risotto in perspective.

    Oh yeah, that's real good perspective. People who think a $1,000 lunch is a reasonable business expesnse think shit - canning programmers is a good idea. The article goes on to predict good economic times. Ugh.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:What the people who fired you did. by Otter · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I'm wondering if the Four Seasons is hiring waiters. IIRC, wine isn't included in the basis for the tip but still...

  57. Re:Someone please save WinAmp!!! by mrtroy · · Score: 1

    APPARENTLY...

    They skipped 4.

    Since winamp 2 + winamp 3 == winamp5

    The speed and stability of 2 with the features and more of 3

    *cough*

    --
    [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  58. Re:I'm not surprised. AOL will ultimately fall. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when Netzero was making TV ads saying "we are free, and always will be." So there is hope that "AOL will dominate the ISP market" will prove false very soon.

  59. This is a good thing... by KaiserZoze_860 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know your gut reaction (and that of those directly effected by the cuts) is that this is a travesty of justice and that AOL should burn in hell (and it should along with that ridiculous yellow d00d).

    There is a sunny side to this. Think of all the talent that has been freed into the California landscape... All of those coders, with nothing but time on their hands (in between job searches)...

    I think we can expect to see some interesting and potentially ground breaking start-ups to appear come June/July when they've all given up trying to join a big company. Isn't that how we got from 16mHz machines only good for word processing to the current state of internet, gaming rigs, media servers and TiVo's in the first place?

    To those who are unfortunately out of the job, please keep your talents current. By all means, discuss the idea you had in the shower this morning for that great new piece of software/hardware with your best friend over a beer. Put a desk in your garage and start typing. Give the tech power so horribly mismanaged by corporate America (online) back where it belongs: with the geeks.

    --KS--

  60. The executives will hear this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "You've failed to grow the company but you got a multimillion dollar bonus anyway!"

  61. XMMS by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    ..Should be ported to Windows if Winamp goes down. Shoot, I don't know if I'd tell the difference.

  62. Re:Hex on the nullsoft.com page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The text is not black, it's different dark purple colors.
    Looks "good" in Safari. Maybe you have your screen brightness low?

  63. Re:Someone please save WinAmp!!! by KaiserZoze_860 · · Score: 1

    WinAmp 5 rocks so far. Defenitly worth the hunt to find yourself a copy. I grabbed mine off of a weekly software posting on IRCSpy.com about 3 weeks ago. The beta I use at work is as stable or more so than the copy of Winamp 3 it replaced. --KS

  64. propaganda. by twitter · · Score: 1
    I have to point out that it's CAPITALIST propaganda. They're doing it for the money.

    So did Stalin.

    Industrial consolidation of the kind we are seeing is not capitalist, it's the result of excesive regulations and predatory practices. Where those regulations are most restrictive, you have the greatest consolidation. Music and media, FCC, RIAA, MPAA. Telecomunications, FCC. Electric power, too numerous to mention, though there are reasonable justifications that have been abused. Medicine is being socialized. The end result is functionally equivalent to communism - you are not alowed to compete or even complain about it and poorly informed drones make decisions for you.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:propaganda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's probably closer to "Imperialism", or at least how the Marxists look at it.

    2. Re:propaganda. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      What propaganda from Stalin talks about profit?

      lol... I find your post hilarious. You are blaming everything on communism? Get real... I just love how capitalists always blame government regulation for EVERYTHING. Once upon a time, job losses were never blamed on communism (since socialist entites are "inefficient" and keep people around). Now it seems job losses are fair game.

      It seems like you are in complete denial of the system that you worship... Don't worry... you'll get hired in another industry with little government regulation...and you'll get fired. Then, you'll stop worshipping the God of capitalism... you'll become a disaffected worker. Mark my words...

      I mean no ill towards you. I wish you weren't fired, just like I wish no worker is ever fired (unless they carried out some harm)... but it's just too funny how you blame "Communist Propaganda" for it...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    3. Re:propaganda. by jafac · · Score: 1

      Um, so how exactly does one limit predatory practices without excessive regulations. I'd really like to know. In fact, I think about 6 billion people would really like to know.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  65. And winamp 5 was shaping up by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Winamp 2 was ancient. WinAmp 3 sucked.

    Winamp 5 (2+3) was looking real good, I really really like it.

    Wish it would continue. I really hope it does.

    1. Re:And winamp 5 was shaping up by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      ...but still no plans to profitability...

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  66. Cost of living by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Unfortunatly if that guy tried offering wages like that around cities like Boston you'd be spending most of your income on housing. You'd always be one paycheck away from being homeless. As long as companies gravitate to expensive areas like the northeast they have to pay a reasonable salary.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Cost of living by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

      True. I remember an article on SiliconValley.Com talking about tech pro's who were employed at $40K - 60K / Year and HOMELESS, due to the astronomical cost of housing in the Bay area. They could not even afford rent!

      What may need to be done by governments, industry, etc. is to encourage back office IT to locate to lower cost areas in the USA. Utah's UTOPIA project might be an example of something local / state government can do. It certainly beats paying for a factory or chicken processing plant to locate in a rural area!

    2. Re:Cost of living by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      The reason housing is so expensive is because the government doesn't let developers build enough of it (among other reasons). There are zoning laws, density restrictions, etc. etc. If you let developers build more housing, the demand for it wouldn't be so high and the prices would go down.

    3. Re:Cost of living by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've touched on a big beef of mine. Bay area housing at $250-$400/SF and up is not substantially different than Roanoke, Virginia housing at $100/SF, except you get more land under the building.

      I bought 8 acres of hillside with a view that even God would be envious of for about 50k. Sure, it's ten miles outside of Blackburg (Virginia Tech), but that's not too far to drive. I even have DSL and CableTV (though I get my video via DirecTV).

      I started a company that relies on the building industry, so I have to be somewhat close to civilization, and I'll be generating real income in under a year...starting from scratch.

      Why is it that high tech firms believe that they must locate in big, expensive cities? How many of your programmers have to make face-to-face visits with clients on a weekly basis? You could just as easily move to Newport, Pembroke, or Pearisburg, VA and set up shop for nickles on the dollar. Would people have to relocate? Probably. Can you live on $45k? Comfortably. And you'll know your neighbors, and everybody will wave to you when they see you. Go to www.gilescounty.org, call up Chris McKlarney and he'll set you up. He's got space for new businesses that's just now coming online.

      Me? I rent space in an historic building downtown for under $5/SF. 768kADSL to my business runs $44/mo. Electricity is $0.05/kWh. VaTech is right down the road - good for interns and p/t workers, plus the research library and all the attractions of a big state campus.

      Locating a non-geographically sensitive business in a big city is about as smart as equiping an accounting firm with Aeron chairs, solid mahogony furniture, G5s with 23" 16:9 LCDs, and a couple of DS3s. Sure it looks nice, but it's ego-fluff that will likely kill the business financially before it ever has a chance.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Cost of living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First no one in their right mind, with any modicum of any intellegence or skills would want to live in a place like Virgina. It is bad enough that is is part of the States, but wanting companies to move real jobs down there is crazy. Of course it is cheaper than SF, it is a waste land where no sane person would want to be. And of course you are driving everywhere, but that is another story.

    5. Re:Cost of living by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      That can't be applied everywhere. Availability of land and transportation are major factors. Where can you build in San Francisco, Boston, or New York City that hasn't been already built up to the hilt? Work in the city and want to live there? I hope you are either rich, like lots of roomates, don't mind scary neighborhoods, or like living in a matchbox. Go ahead and live 30 miles outside of town but good luck trying to get to work in under two hours unless they had the good sense to build a commuter rail system (plus parking!) too. Even areas that are considered the suburbs around Boston (like rt 495) are quickly turning into the same over built, expensive, traffic choked messes those business and residents were supposedly escaping.

      By the way, don't be so quick to pull out the "blame the gub-ment" cliche. Around Boston those zoning rules are created by the people in those towns who go to the town meetings, planning boards, etc. If folks don't like them they have to get motivated and attend some of the votes and meetings themselves. If a representative or town committee member only hears from one side of the story they will assume that is the general consensus.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Cost of living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "no one in their right mind, with any modicum of any intellegence or skills would want to live in a place like Virgina"

      But then how do you explain all of the federal government agencies that are located there?...oh, ok, I get it now.

    7. Re:Cost of living by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Well that's life. Either they'll have to create more housing somehow (high-rises, probably) or prices will go up and up. As for traffic, yeah it's a toughy and commuter rail is a good option, but try to get people to use it. People don't realize that when they try to escape the city by moving out into the suburbs, the rest of the city follows.

    8. Re:Cost of living by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Blacksburg myself. It's really a great little college town. Ironically, there are quite a few little tech businesses in the area. Most are offshoots of the massive research facilities.

      Most people make fun of Blacksburg because the town is non-existant (it's basically a bunch of restuarants and hotels that surround the school), but it has all the essentials, and is suprisingly well wired (a town of 40,000 locals and 15,000 engineering students will do that). It's also one of the few places you'll go where you'll see a cow standing next to a multi-million dollar research facillity.

      Although as we all know Charlottesville is clearly the better city.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  67. Re:AOL Winamp/Netscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did anyone else pick up the Arising from the Ashes pun? You know..Pheonix, dies in a burst of flames only to be reborn from the ashes...was it intended?

  68. wow by shoptroll · · Score: 1
    Wow.

    I had read about this as a rumor on some site yesterday, being pointed there about some layoffs at Vivendi I think.

    I hope this doesn't hurt the Nullsoft guys that much, since Winamp5 is now in beta testing according to their forums

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  69. Re: International Finance by benzapp · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter how you justify yourself.

    Your time of retribution is coming. Every year more and more people lose their jobs, their future, and ultimately their life(but perhaps not their existence).

    People only choose to be a part of a society when it benefits them. As soon as the people gain nothing from following your ridiculous economic laws they will start their own society in its place. A man who has lost everything has nothing to lose by fighting for change.

    In the end you are a traitor, and when the revolution comes, you will have no place in the new order. Your ideology is destructive because it depends upon the bourgeois as its justification, but it ultimately leads to its destruction. You are not guided by any ideal of human advancement, only materialistic gain(and your belief that is the prime motivator of human existence). The nihilism of the western world you see all around you is just the beginning. For now, sex, drugs, and rock and roll is enough to keep the people amused. We have reached the apex of that ploy however. No one cares about rock and roll anymore. Alcohol consumption is declining. Party drugs have lost their thrill, but heroin is coming back, a sign people need a powerful pain killer for their troubled souls. The vast numbers of whores on every communications medium has trivialized sexuality. People rightly view now as no different than eating. Its just a different kind of hunger.

    The only animal instinct left to tittilate is bloodlust. It is the desire for war which affects all great change. Every other desire simply placates.

    The only question left to ask is what side will you be on?

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  70. Re:Winamp's Time is Over by Will+Fisher · · Score: 2, Informative

    Winamp 5 is nearing release, and these layoffs (as regrettable as they are) will not effect the Winamp 5 release.

    The nullsoft members who were laid off were working on streaming media.

    I believe that with the advent of winamp pro (for full speed cd ripping and burning and mp3 encoding) which will cost a small amount of $. We will see winamp having a steady revenue stream that will hopefully keep the core winamp team safe.

  71. Now wait just one minizzle... by buzzcutbuddha · · Score: 1

    couldn't this just be because they had to free up some revenue to pay for that witty commercial with Jerry Stiller and Snoop Dogg?

    I mean, now that I've seen that, and AOL's brand of self-deprecating brand of humor, why, I almost went out and installed AOL myself!

    Oh wait...no I didn't.

    I hope AOL goddamn dies.

  72. Math by iaredam · · Score: 1
    bmarklein writes "AOL has laid off 450 in California. The former Netscape campus is going from 675 employees to 300.


    I know that my math skills suck, but 675 - 450 != 300
  73. Open Source Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open source advocates again scored another victory in the war against proprietary software as for-profit megacorporation AOL decides to stop paying hundreds of programmers for so-called "development". Open source advocates see a change in the tide of their long-running battle for free software. "Companies are finally beginning to realize the power of open source means not having to pay for programming", states open source guru Gunna Notwork Agin. Industry watchers perceive AOL's move as significant given the high profile of AOL's Netscape browser, which is based on software contributed -for free- by a large and active commumity of hobbyists.

    "AOL's new corporate policy is to never pay to develop sofware that AOL can receive for free. It's a big shift for us.", states AOL's CEO Richard Parsons. "In the past our IT budget consumed vast resources, mostly personnel expenses, that had a negative affect on earnings. Not any more. Those days are over for good".

    Many open source advocates questioned could not respond to the publishing of this article because in the words of one advocate, "Somebody has to bus these tables". Where this trend leads is difficult to say, but this reporter is betting that happy days are here again as a result of GNU movement. Hurrah!

  74. I Should Have Baked You A Cake by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    Happy 15th Birthday, tough guy!

    1. Re:I Should Have Baked You A Cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like anyone other than college students who have taken Macroeconomics ever spout such textbook crap.

      You are the one who has betrayed your age.

    2. Re:I Should Have Baked You A Cake by benzapp · · Score: 1

      "When human hearts break and human souls despair, then from the twilight of the past great conquerors of distress and care, of disgrace and misery, of spiritual bondage and physical constraint, look down upon them and hold out their eternal hands to despairing mortals. Woe to the people that is ashmed to grasp them."

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  75. Re:AOL Winamp/Netscape by Requiem · · Score: 1

    was it intended?

    Given that this is Slashdot, home of the illiterate ill-spoken many and one of the few places that can make a grown grammar nazi cry, I'd have to say it wasn't.

  76. Turn off your stupid TV. It's that simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you watch their crap anyway?

    Hell.. I bet you even PAY to watch that stupid shit. :)

    Don't blame yourself... you were brought up that way I'm sure.

  77. America Online by Djanossy+II · · Score: 1

    Those America Online employees are in my hopes and prayers. Who knows maybe America Online is outsourcing their jobs. That would make me laugh.

    --
    You might know everything, but you certainly don't know everybody...
  78. We need to put a huge wall around India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more American jobs are lost here, the more
    it becomes harder for everyone to live.

  79. Re:shit head. by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Troll
    Time bought AOL to stifle it


    Ok troll, I'll bite. AOL bought Winamp. AOL bought Netscape. AOL bought Time Warner.


    After the merger, the the value of AOL dropped faster than CmdrTaco's pants when he's got the shits, Steve Case left, and "AOL Time Warner" renamed themselves back to "Time Warner", but it wasn't Time Warner that bought AOL.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  80. 1 handed typists take heed...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please switch over to phone sex chat lines
    in protest!

  81. correction by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    oops... mistake in my post...

    I should not have referred to anyone being "fired". Instead, we are talking about lay-offs. So, replace fired with laid off...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  82. AOL is not in bed with Microsoft... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If anything, AOL Time Warner sued Microsoft. Sure, AOL shouldn't have settled their antitrust case, but large institutional shareholders have been pressuring the board to start cutting costs and reducing debt (kinda funny how AOL Time Warner has $25 billion in debt and shareholders are complaining yet Comcast has a debt of $30 + billion and its JUST a cable company) and they didn't have the stomach to continue fighting Microsoft which probably would've lasted in court another 5 years. So instead of winning a $10 billion case, having the damages trippled to $30 billion and then having to fight Microsoft on appeals for several more years, AOL Time Warner took the $750 million settlement and "promised" to look at Microsoft's Windows Media technology.

    Since then, AOL has been aligning itself with Apple. Instead of using WMA files, AOL has been shifting to support the iTunes Music Store. Big loss for MSN. Sure, AOL has been cutting out Mozilla development, but they haven't snuggled up to Microsoft either. I would be willing to bet that AOL Time Warner was embarassed to fund Mozilla once Apple brought Safari to market (I'd bet money AOL would offer a Windows-based "Safari" if Apple made an official port). Check out that AOL PC. AOL is rebundling Star Office as "AOL Office." That's not exactly endearing themselves to Microsoft. AOL also gave lipservice in the settlement to AIM/MSN interoperability, but nothing has happened on that account (I'd expect to see AIM/Yahoo Messenger interoperability before that). AIM is now available on all the major mobile phone services in the U.S. (Cingular just signed on).

    So where exactly is the so-called Microsoft-love? AOL is still fighting Microsoft, although it is more special ops style than overt displays. And if AOL cuts Nullsoft, it isn't because of Microsoft, its because of Apple's iTunes... After all, Steve Jobs pretty much praised AOL in that interview with Rolling Stone, plus anyone with a Mac with Safari as their browser knows that the Netscape/Apple webpage is the default homepage for nothing...

    ps. Oh, I completely forgot about AOL and Apple's cozy relationship with iChat...hmmm...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  83. terrible news... but sort of inevitable by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    This is terrible news (workers losing jobs is never good--take it from someone who is unemployed) but this lay-off was almost inevitable. AOL simply is overvalued and doesn't even make much money. It simply became so large due to the Time-Warner merger. Since that fizzled (there wasn't even a case for the merger in the first place), AOL is in a sad state... It wouldn't surprise me if even more AOL employees are laid off within 3 quarters...

    As a side note, notice how the CEOs that WASTED billions with the merger (yes, stockholders lost BILLIONS) were never ever fired. AOL CEO stepped down (never fired) but well after making his money. I'm sure Steve Chase "resigned" with massive bonus payments and perks...

    BTW, there is some guy who is blaming problems like on Communist propaganda. lol... pretty soon, these guys are going to blame communism for the Iraqi war boondoggle...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  84. Re:I'm not surprised. AOL will ultimately fall. by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

    But if you recall, until recently they were free ISPs. They would have sunk like one of Dick Cheney's kidney stones if they had sent out a massive amount of CDs back then.

  85. New Employee MOTD by bdhein · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "You've got fired!"

  86. People don't give a shit in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't give a fuck about their fellow man.
    I think AmeriKKKa needs to have it's economy
    destroyed so people here will wake the fuck up and
    start caring.

  87. another correction. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    job losses were never blamed on communism (since socialist entites are "inefficient" and keep people around). Now it seems job losses are fair game.

    inefficient == less than full capacity. Central planning wastes resources that people would otherwise exploit as they pleased. The net result is a lower standard of living and under-employment. It's generally for the benefit of those in power under both systems too.

    Music is a good example of market consolidation resemeling a socialist state. The FCC decides who can broadcast and collects lots of money. The big music companies decide who they will promote and collect lots of money. People who could promote alternate acts are locked out and musicians end up doing anything else for a living because music does not pay, even for best selling artists. So the whole structure of restrictions is really supporting the FCC and RIAA. It can be argued that musicians would be better off, ie employed, in a system that was free.

    Don't worry, I was fired.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:another correction. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to address your efficiency issue. It's just going to get into the typical socialist vs capitalist debate with neither side agreeing on anything. Suffice to say, I WILL agree with your view that socialist entities (like public schools, public healthcare, public roads, public police, etc) are inefficienty from a capitalist point of view.

      You are overvaluing the significance of the FCC. First of all, it isn't THAT expensive to run say a radio station. This is why there are still many independent, small, or college radio stations. In fact, entering say the car market is much tougher (due to restricutions enforcing safety requirements, etc).

      Second, the FCC rules (especially regarding on-air stuff eg. radio) haven't changed THAT much over the years. If anything, the rules are pretty similar to the past. Given this, you'll note that there are more oligopolies and monopolies now than ever. If what you are saying were true, there would have been very little competition from day one. Yet it wasn't like that. There are far more radio stations, television stations, newspapers, etc in the past than now. The FCC hasn't changed so what has?

      As far as musicians not making money, you are being hypocritical like most quasi-capitalists (this makes me think you are not a capitalist but a quasi-capitalist--someone that supports capitalism but doesn't truly believe in it). The market pays whatever it wants--that's capitalism. You can't go around claiming someone is not making enough money. There is no such thing as "fair wages" under the capitalist view. The fact that I can go to some poor country and get people to work 12 hours a day without any washroom breaks for $1/day is perfectly ok under capitalism.

      My theory is that capitalism results in oligopolies and monopolies. No, it isn't because of govt intervention. It happens in ALL industries. Even in a relatively free market, you'll end up with an oligopoly or monopoly. There are several reasons this happens but the most improtant is economies of scale and profit-maximization. Large corporations have huge economies of scale. Therefore, it is in their interest to merge and create even larger entities. No one is forcing companies to merge! They are doing it themselves. The other thing is that a monopoly generates the most profit for a business (in contrast, the best thing for consumers is perfect competition). This essentially means that a private business attempts to create a monopoly (or at worst an oligopoly). This happens all the time whether people realize it or not. If YOU were a business owner, you will attempt to monopolize your market.

      BTW, if you are fired, did they give a reason? I mean, firing usually means you were terminated for something YOU did. Whereas, lay-offs means you lost your job for something THEY did. You can't really fire someone without a reason.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  88. Justin's busy by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 2, Funny

    doing lines off a supermodel's chest. rich/lucky bastard. :-P

  89. Classic AOL! by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1
    The company has not yet decided which of its development projects will be terminated as a result of the layoffs, Whitney said.

    Nice. So first they'll fire possibly the wrong people and then decide which projects will suffer the least by the layoffs? The usual AOL priority screw-up witnessed again.

  90. I Hope... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

    I hope it's everyone responsible for sending me a tin can with a CD in it every ten minutes for the past five years.

    There must be whole landfills full of those things.

    1. Re:I Hope... by DylanQuixote · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's like 262974 CDs...

      which would be about 8217 pounds (about 4 tons)...
      (assuming a CD weighs half-ounce)

      Do you *really* get 144 CDs a day?

    2. Re:I Hope... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      Of course not... embellishment for effect.

      But I do receive at least three a month (that's a considerable amount of waste),they go straight from the mailbox to the trash and there's no way to recycle them.

  91. Always before the holidays by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    Company's like AOL tend to do their layoffs at the end of the year to make final numbers look better to the board. But in the process, they ruin holidays and otherwise good family events. I can understand when a company goes bankrupt, but you'd think that when they're just doing it to make the numbers look a bit better, that they'd have the decency to pick a better time of year. Read through f'dcompany.com and you'll see a trend of near year-end layoffs. Sas that money hungry corporate types are insensitive to the familys and needs of the average worker. Not everyone makes 6 figures. Many live month to month and unemployment isn't always enough... especially at the holidays.

  92. Soon, all the Jim Clark companies will be gone by Animats · · Score: 1
    Healtheon is gone. SGI is dying. Netscape is almost dead.

    And Jim Clark is still rich.

    We need much longer holding periods for insiders, as Buffett (Warren, not Jimmy) used to point out.

    1. Re:Soon, all the Jim Clark companies will be gone by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Healtheon is gone.

      Turned into WebMD

      SGI is dying.

      Microsoft bought much of their relevant IP so they could ship the XBox, royalty-free. Nintendo, NVidia and ATI got their Engineers. Tera got Cray.

      We need much longer holding periods for insiders

      Clark is famous for, among other things, writing some of the most favorable deals with VCs ever. He keeps a large share of the company and holds it for a long time. This reduces marke liquidity and makes it more difficult for outsiders to participate in his companies. If anything, Clark's problem was holding his shares for too long, creating fragile, monolithic companies.

      Presently, the economy is recovering from the Enron and Worldcom accounting scandals. It is difficult to turn a good idea into $$$ when there is little consensus as to how the new accounting rules should be interpreted to successfully create new wealth.

      Until then, expect to see some growth in international companies listing ADS/ADR on US exchanges. It will be a few more years before we see rapid American tech growth.

  93. The 'Pro' version by kypper · · Score: 1

    I noticed they're charging for the mp3 ripping... (understandable; they have to pay for the licensing) Couldn't they make a freeware 'ogg-pro' version that doesn't have to pay for the stupid mp3 licensing, and still gives people the 'pro' name? That would help ogg take off pretty seriously, I would think.

  94. 1 of the 450? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone make the obligatory Snoop-Dogg joke yet?

  95. Incredible by kortex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In my snail mail. AOL 9.0 in a tin box. I wonder how much they spent on these tin boxes. I also wonder if it was worth the jobs of 450 people. The idiocy of some corporations new cease to amaze me.

    --
    -- kortex "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts"
    1. Re:Incredible by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      Hey, I use the AOL disk as a coaster and the tin box holds my burned CDs.

      No, in all seriousness, I have to agree that the lost jobs are no joking matter, and AOL wasted their money. Oh, and the landfills are overflowing with those damned CDs. I'm not sure what's worse, all of the spam I get in my email or all of the AOL CDs I get in my mailbox.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  96. And they will get rent checks where? by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    There is a sunny side to this. Think of all the talent that has been freed into the California landscape... All of those coders, with nothing but time on their hands (in between job searches)...

    And nothing to pay the rent with, or to buy new development workstations with.

    I think we can expect to see some interesting and potentially ground breaking start-ups to appear come June/July when they've all given up trying to join a big company. Isn't that how we got from 16mHz machines only good for word processing to the current state of internet, gaming rigs, media servers and TiVo's in the first place?

    No, that was Intel and AMD racing to get customers by offering faster and faster chips.

    To those who are unfortunately out of the job, please keep your talents current.

    Books cost money.

    By all means, discuss the idea you had in the shower this morning for that great new piece of software/hardware with your best friend over a beer.

    And now you want them to become alcoholics?

    Put a desk in your garage and start typing.

    You expect unemployed helpdesk people to afford houses?

  97. WHAT THE HELL, MODS??? by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 0

    i posted on-topic entirely and got modded down from 1 to 0 as 'overrated.' how the hell is NO additional mod points 'overrated'????

  98. The Mountain View campus is already empty by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's where I used to work. 475 Ellis St. Now I work at NASA, literally down the street from the Netscape/AOL campus.

    AOL took the "Netscape" logo OFF of the signs facing the street. The Netscape flag is gone. The parking lots are almost always empty and there are several "FOR LEASE" signs dotting the campus.

    Meanwhile, the *old* Netscape building houses Verisign and the old Netscape fountain has the %$#@! Verisign logo on it.

    It's really sad and depressing.

    1. Re:The Mountain View campus is already empty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work at Netscape too. The original promises to preserve the Netscape culture untouched were lost as quickly as Steve Case lost influence at AOL. In the past 18 months AOL West/Mountain View became an increasingly crappy place to work, with tyrannical, power crazy upper management threatening sudden death at any moment. The axe finally came down, in waves - the initial cut in July of the "troublemakers" (those that held on tightest to Netscape/Mozilla individuality) and then more recently of most everyone else.

      Apparently the exec that did the engineering layoffs yesterday had bodyguards. That gives you an idea of the feeling within AOL-West towards his strategies.

      The survivors of the 2003 purges are based out of one building now, the KPMG clone on Ellis St. The original Quad (23-26) and 20-23 (including the old Netscape CPD, Bldg 21) are being leased.

    2. Re:The Mountain View campus is already empty by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is, who got the huge frosted lucite 'N', the one we all signed on a boat at our one-year anniversary, which used to be hanging in the customer briefing center?

      And what ever happened to the huge styrofoam Mozilla, as seen in the photo where it's standing atop the remains of the big fallen IE logo? The Mozilla which was carefully reassembled by hand after it blew out of the back of a pickup truck and shattered on 101 on the way to Bay to Breakers one year?

  99. Still leaves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, about 15,000 employees in their "AOL trial CD" dispatch department then?

  100. I don't give a hoot about "Justin" by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Hope Justin is still employed

    Nice worshipping there. Who cares? He's just another programmer who happened to write a (rather poor, unscaleable) p2p network. He's not god's gift to humanity, by any stretch of the imagination- and certainly not worthy of front-page mention.

  101. OT Re:Hope Justin is still employed by hysma · · Score: 1

    Not sure what to worry about more... being proud that Winamp is good enough to be used in space... or being afraid that the US gov't uses Microsloth for the systems in space.

  102. America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way-Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You got it right on the nose! "Buy American" crap is just racist protectionism."

    Well as Regan would say "There you go again...". Pulling out the race card. There's nothing "racial" about it, because the call isn't coming from or going to a "Race". Nationalism would be more accurate.

  103. Try Winamp 5 by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

    I'm running Winamp 5.0beta2 and it's rather nice. All the features of Winamp 2 + all the features of Winamp 3 = Winamp 5. That means all the fancy skins, plus all the video support and everything else.

    You can get it here if you want to try it out, though it is an *unofficial* release. Works great, though.

  104. whoever you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you will be running out of points soon, so no more modding me down for no reason. what the hell is your problem?

  105. Who owns stock in AOL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably you! You support AOL if you have investments with any of these companies or mutual fund holders...

    Capital Guardian Trust Company 1,177,800 8.51 $16,288,974 30-Sep-03
    Integral Capital Management Vi, LLC 316,600 2.29 $4,378,578 30-Sep-03
    Royce & Associates, Inc. 1,441,200 10.41 $19,931,796 30-Sep-03
    Integral Capital Management V, LLC 246,730 1.78 $3,412,275 30-Sep-03
    Empire Capital Partners LP 205,000 1.48 $1,961,849 30-Jun-03
    Barclays Bank Plc 174,686 1.26 $2,415,907 30-Sep-03
    Bjurman, Barry & Associates 160,000 1.16 $2,212,800 30-Sep-03
    ING Investments, LLC 143,100 1.03 $1,979,073 30-Sep-03
    Oberweis Asset Management Inc. 112,000 0.81 $1,548,960 30-Sep-03
    Whitney Asset Management LLC 76,967 0.56 $1,064,453 30-Sep-03

    Royce Technology Value Fund 105,000 0.76 $1,004,849 30-Jun-03
    Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund 24,713 0.18 $236,503 30-Jun-03
    Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund 17,875 0.13 $171,063 30-Jun-03
    Marketocracy Masters 100 Fund 3,900 0.03 $53,937 30-Sep-03
    Spartan Extended Market Index Fund 3,753 0.03 $54,831 31-Aug-03
    Spartan Total Market Index Fund 3,132 0.02 $45,758 31-Aug-03
    Vanguard Balanced Index Fund 2,125 0.02 $20,336 30-Jun-03
    Quantitative Master Series Tr-Extended Market Index Seri 1,775 0.01 $16,986 30-Jun-03
    Vanguard Institutional Index-Inst Total Stock Market Ind 705 0.01 $6,746 30-Jun-03
    Manufacturers Investment Trust-Total Stock Market Index 349 0 $3,339 30-Jun-03

  106. WinAmp has been done for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you guys, but I havn't upgraded winAmp since 1999... or somewhere in there. Anyway, my point is, why would AOL continue to support its developers when there's nothing left to do? WinAMP 3 just plain sucks ass. I'd cut Nullsoft too, just to increase profits. Seriously, what has Nullsoft done lately? Nothing. WinAmp 2.x kicks ass, but it's done.

  107. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way-R by los+furtive · · Score: 1

    You are correct. My appologies. However, I don't doubt that for a certain percentage of the population (a vocal one I might add), its racism disgused as nationalism.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  108. Re:Someone please save WinAmp!!! by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

    come on moderators this comment doesn't deserve -2.
    its true, winamp2 good, winamp3 bad. and whats this adding -1 overrated to an already -1, that just doesn't make sense.

    winamp 3 is a pile of shit.

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
  109. Re:Winamp's Time is Over by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

    And quite frankly, I still see them with enough brand loyalty to get a HUGE amount of money, even if they're charging something as small as $5.

  110. It'll get worse by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

    CNN had a story the other day where they confirmed AOL was among the companies sending jobs overseas. I'm sure this is just to make room in their budget to open up their offices overseas for cheaper labor. It's not like they shouldn't already making more $$ than any other ISP with their prices.

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  111. Opportunity? by semanticgap · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the laid off guys will start their own companies that will give us something more exciting to talk about than AOL.

    I think it's clear that the techies shouldn't have trusted the business types in the mid nineties and retained control rather than relinquish it for venture capital. We would have all been better off.

    But I think the year 2004 is going to be the revenge of the techie - there will be new small innovative companies popping up, and they will not be for sale to AOL's of this world this time.

  112. AOL 9 CDs by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    I got the latest AOL CD in the mail the other day, and it went in the microwave as it always does. However, the little tin it came in is actually rather nice. Now I just have to figure out a use for it beyond the obvious "protect CD/DVD" and "target practice" applications.

    Keep on sending them, AOL! Keep the discs, send more boxes, that is!

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  113. Don't worry about Nullsoft by kobotronic · · Score: 1

    FYI - From what I've heard from sources within Nullsoft, only Winamp3 development has been affected. And that product wasn't going anywhere in the first place. Check out Winamp5 btw, it's fun. :)

  114. Re:AOL Winamp/Netscape by eibhear · · Score: 1

    Ow. That was mean. Slashdot is also rampant with people shooting their mouths off without a modicum of research. At least I try.

    I'm probably going to get modded down for this, but here we go...

    While I'm ignorant of a great many things, illiterate I am not. In fact, one of my chief interests is history. I also have a tendency to include a certain flippancy into most comments I write. This makes it more likely that I "it" was intended, don't you think?

    I'm also a pedant, and something of what you call a "grammar nazi" (horrible term).

    Go easy, and if you're going to utter a stereotype, make sure your subject is a member to the class.

    Eibhear

  115. Re:AOL Winamp/Netscape by Requiem · · Score: 1

    My subject was grown grammar nazis, and I believe I'm a member of that set. Therefore, I didn't have any issues with you or your postings; I was referring to Slashdot in general.