Slashdot Mirror


Curse Your Way to Live Support

EtherMonkey writes "Wired is reporting on new software developed at University of Southern California's Speech Analysis and Interpretation Laboratory. Researchers there have come up with working code to detect the frustration and anger level of callers working their way through automated attendant phone systems."The system works by analyzing not only what callers say, but also how they say it. Callers get transferred if they start to spit out expletives or if they simply sound angry.""

486 comments

  1. No automated system at Microsoft? by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this were used at Microsoft, would this mean that the automated system would never be used?

    1. Re:No automated system at Microsoft? by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      Hey mods, you can laugh at this. It's a joke, and kinda funny too. ^_^

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
    2. Re:No automated system at Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      And if you had a newsletter, I'd subscribe to it.

    3. Re:No automated system at Microsoft? by elbarrio · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I think a form of this was used at Microsoft a while back. I remember interviewing there (when I was young and confused) and being told by the interviewer that if you enter something like "This fucking thing won't work" into the help system, it automatically gives you the number for tech support. The idea is that if you're that unhappy you should really be speaking to a liver person, not navigating through the help system. Then again, I never actually confirmed this, and apparently it's not true for word XP.

  2. YEEEHAAAA by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why do I foresee an increase of callers with Tourrettes?

    (auto attendant)Thank you for calling XYZ corp. For support, press

    (customer) FUCK SHIT DAMN HELL BITCH!!!

    (auto attendant) Transferring to an attendant. Thanks for calling XYZ Corp.

    (customer) SCHWEET.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:YEEEHAAAA by cryptogryphon · · Score: 1

      Now that is what I call a learning algorithm.

    2. Re:YEEEHAAAA by mjprobst · · Score: 2, Informative

      Y'know, not everyone with Tourette's Syndrome swears up a storm. Educate yourself.

    3. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not? Then what else do they do? I thought that was the whole point of having Tourette's Syndrome.

    4. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booooorriiiiiiiiing

    5. Re:YEEEHAAAA by ePhil_One · · Score: 5, Funny

      I consider my predjudices a handicap. You should be more considerate and understanding, before I have to call it a hate crime and involve the authorities!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    6. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Y'know, not everyone is serious when the post to Slashdot. Educate yourself.

    7. Re:YEEEHAAAA by corbettw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Y'know, not everyone with Tourette's Syndrome swears up a storm. Educate yourself.

      You're right, some sufferers merely lack a sense of humor.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    8. Re:YEEEHAAAA by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Y'know, not everyone with Tourette's Syndrome swears up a storm. Educate yourself.

      Thank you, we will now go dedicate our lives to understanding this, so we will never make an inaccurate joke about TS again.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    9. Re:YEEEHAAAA by jeffy124 · · Score: 5, Funny
      i prefer to think of The Simpsons, from Who Shot Mr Burns Part I:

      Lisa: "Marge, Bart, Lisa, and Maggie." Dad, this doesn't have your name on it.
      [Homer looks closely at the card, then lowers it slowly]
      Homer: Kids, would you step outside for a second?
      [the kids run out]
      [standing up] F --
      [a church organ plays a chord; birds fly away; everyone stops]
      Ned: Dear Lord! That's the loudest profanity I've ever heard.

      Now I could imagine a machine blowing up when faced with some input such as the above.
      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    10. Re: YEEEHAAAA by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1
      Why do I foresee an increase of callers with Tourrettes?

      (auto attendant)Thank you for calling XYZ corp. For support, press

      (customer) FUCK SHIT DAMN HELL BITCH!!!
      I already do that. Especially when the message drones on and on before telling me which button to push.

      Even worse when it's one of those newfangled voice recognition systems that doesn't have a clue what you're saying, if you aren't saying the expected. At least then you have the satisfaction of knowing that a human will hear it, when their analysts go over the recordings of the "give up" calls to see what went awry.
      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    11. Re:YEEEHAAAA by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought that was the whole point of having Tourette's Syndrome.

      Yeah, I can't see any reason to have it if you can't randomly swear either.

    12. Re:YEEEHAAAA by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Touretts Syndrom is simply an extreme case of nervous ticks, one of the well known ticks is swearing but it can be anything.

    13. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


      > Y'know, not everyone with Tourette's Syndrome swears up a storm.

      Yes, we know. But facial tics aren't likely to work very well on a phone-based system, so we're going to stick with the one Tourette's symptom that works for the purpose of making this whole bit funny.

      > Educate yourself.

      I've certainly learned that you're a whiny cunt. Is that educated enough?

    14. Re:YEEEHAAAA by cluckshot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just wonder what this trains people to do in society?

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    15. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You try telling them that...

    16. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure it really trains anyone to do anything. It just reinforces the current status quo behavior ;)

    17. Re:YEEEHAAAA by PhyreFox · · Score: 0

      Transfer 'em to billing. That'll fix the problem. ;)

      --
      My words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
    18. Re:YEEEHAAAA by gi-tux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. Let's reward those that have little or no patience. While we are at it, we must punish those that have self-control. If one has the self-control to not lose their temper with an inanimate object then one's length of time on hold will be increased.

      The real answer is to put people to work answering the phone. Yes, they cost more than the computer system costs in the short term, but all your customers are happier in the long run also. Besides that, if more people are working the cost can be distributed to more customers and the economy improves, etc.

      In the long run everyone would be better off! Well, except the guy that invented and probably patented this concept. And if we crush his patent aren't we better off also?

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    19. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Syberghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I renew my call for a "Clueless" moderation category.

    20. Re:YEEEHAAAA by wynndow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      example could be just as effective without the expletives...should be moderated.

    21. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > Y'know, not everyone with Tourette's Syndrome swears up a storm. Educate yourself.


      That's so verFUCK YOUy true. Thank you, ASSHOLE, for your informative attempt to fiEAT A BOWL OF DICKght prejudice in our community.

    22. Re:YEEEHAAAA by pimpybra · · Score: 0, Troll

      You fucking pussy. Suck it the fuck up, or get the fuck off the god damn internet.

    23. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a damn joke relax and get the stick out of your ass. You will live longer.

      Some people......

    24. Re:YEEEHAAAA by lommer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just shudder to to think that this will train people, to the point where eventually most tech support calls will sound like this. Do the people who came up with this actually think they'll be making things easier on themselves?

      For other tech support stories and recordings like the mouse one, see http://www.techcomedy.com/new_stories.php. Disclaimer: I'm not affiliated with the website, I just remembered reading some funny things there that popped into mind when I read this story.

    25. Re:YEEEHAAAA by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I just wonder what this trains people to do in society?
      Nothing they didn't do already. Some people feel that attack is the best option when they think they are somehow wronged at the post office, tailgated at a traffic light, or whatever. As soon as they have a conflict, they start with shouting, abuse and threats.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    26. Re:YEEEHAAAA by ReTay · · Score: 1

      Or at the very least humor impaired.....

    27. Re:YEEEHAAAA by StupidHelpDeskGuy · · Score: 1
      Companies catering to people with little self control, or patience. Imagine that.

      If you sold crappy bobbles and trinkets, wouldn't you want your customers to have as little self control as possible?

      Just a thought.

    28. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Educate yourself.
      I've certainly learned that you're a whiny cunt. Is that educated enough?


      Hey mods! Make sure you mod this guy down for being un-PC and offensive.

      ...oh and being to damn funny for slashdot.

      What's all this shouting? We'll have no trouble here!

    29. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, not everyone with Tourette's Syndrome swears up a storm.

      True. Some run for President. YAAAAAAAAUGH!!!

    30. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean coprolalia. This is a very rare symptom of Tourette Syndrome (on the order of a percent or so).

    31. Re:YEEEHAAAA by gid13 · · Score: 1

      It must suck to be an operator there, too. Even more than other places.

    32. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, not everyone is as humorless as you seem. Educate yourself.

    33. Re:YEEEHAAAA by OriginalSpaceMan · · Score: 1

      I see it more like this... Them: "Thank you for contacting HP. Hablar espanol, dame 'espanol'. For English, please stay on the line. For technical support, please say 'Support'." Me: "YOU DIRTY ASS WHORE BITCHES... support"

      --

      You talk better than you fool!
    34. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I worked in retail (a year or two ago), pleasing bad customers was a practice. If a customer got to a manager, they always got a good deal unless what they wanted was unreasonable or impossible.

      One day, I marked down the price on a few small items for a customer because we didn't have what he really wanted (and what we should have had in stock). The items I gave him were a little more expensive (about $3 more for all of them) than the ones we were out of. I filled out a markdown slip and signed it, then gave it to him. 15 minutes later the head cashier comes back and asks me about the slip - She told me "You marked this as customer service - we only use that if the customer is just about irate." So I guess the lesson is, we only served customers who complain.

    35. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Zenjive · · Score: 1

      I think the swearing part (or even any coherent words) is rare. Most of the time it's guttural noises or howling. Some sufferers try to disguise it by making it sound like they have a chronic cough.

      --


      A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
    36. Re:YEEEHAAAA by waif69 · · Score: 1

      I gonna have to try that when I curse someone a new anus.

    37. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Threni · · Score: 1

      > My thoughts exactly. Let's reward those that have little or no patience. While
      > we are at it, we must punish those that have self-control. If one has the
      > self-control to not lose their temper with an inanimate object then one's length
      > of time on hold will be increased.

      No, you've got it all backwards - this is just an implementation in a call system of what already happens in real life. I'm usually pretty calm, but sometimes, if I can see that the guy in the shop just doesn't understand UK law as regards the Sale Of Goods Act, where its the retailer who is responsible for refunding broken items and not the manufacturer, or if they know the law and are just calling my bluff, I will shout and swear, either to embarass them into giving in, or getting scared/nervous and going to get supervisor who does understand their obligations.

      This doesn't mean I'm generally someone who swears or pushes in front of people in queues or is otherwise obnoxious. I just use it as a tool when it's justified. Some people have to understand that they are in the way of me getting what i've paid for an am legally entitled to. If that's what I have to do, I do it.

    38. Re:YEEEHAAAA by wynndow · · Score: 0

      Isn't this supposed to be a community? Doesn't community imply inclusion rather than exclusion? Not everyone who comes here finds that type of language appealing or desirable. The agreement notice asks people to avoid this type of language. According to the standards of slashdot, the person who submitted the original post and yourself should be getting off this site, not me. Don't you think there's a better way? Please consider the guidelines and others out there with different tastes. Thanks. -Wynndow

    39. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " Why do I foresee an increase of callers with Tourrettes?"

      Actually, I foresee an increase of callers from New York.

      (auto attendant) Thank you for calling XYZ corp. For support, press

      (customer) Who the fuck is this bitch? I want ma fuckin computa fixed!

      (auto attendant) Transferring to an attendant. Thanks for calling XYZ Corp.

      (customer) Fuck off.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    40. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      You have such a good point.

      I think this software shouldn't be used to make irate people's call times shorter, it should be used to determine when a menu system needs to be redesigned. The more angry a person gets, the more likely the menu sucks. I've had some perfectly good phone systems deal with me. If we could just make them better, less people will be irate.

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
    41. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Solar+Limb · · Score: 0

      Oh for the love of fuck, shut up. The last thing we need is some pussified suckbag trying to tell us not to swear on the internet. Jesus Christ.

    42. Re:YEEEHAAAA by RTMFD · · Score: 1

      At first I read this as "I renew my call for a Classless moderation category."

    43. Re:YEEEHAAAA by clem9796 · · Score: 1

      Personally, i just press zero until the operating software is thouroughly convinced that i'm a complete idiot.. a few seconds later and voila, instant live attendant! I wonder why they talk so slow to me though..

      --
      IANALOOA
    44. Re:YEEEHAAAA by wynndow · · Score: 0

      I am sorry to see that you care nothing for what other people think. That's too bad. I'm also sorry that you don't believe in the real community of slashdot. Please be advised of the wording below every reply box: Important Stuff: # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated.

    45. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      "If one has the self-control to not lose their temper with an inanimate object then one's length of time on hold will be increased."

      That's a good way to run a Kindergarden, not a business.

      -B

    46. Re:YEEEHAAAA by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      I think they need to modify that warning to include the fact that Ontopic, calm, appropiate, legal and defensive comments might be moderated as well.

      --
      Why not fork?
    47. Re:YEEEHAAAA by builderbob_nz · · Score: 1

      That's so verFUCK YOUy true. Thank you, ASSHOLE, for your informative attempt to fiEAT A BOWL OF DICKght prejudice in our community.

      That little line makes me wonder what the equivelent of Torette's was 200 years ago when the language and slang was different...

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
    48. Re:YEEEHAAAA by hchaos · · Score: 1
      The real answer is to put people to work answering the phone. Yes, they cost more than the computer system costs in the short term, but all your customers are happier in the long run also. Besides that, if more people are working the cost can be distributed to more customers and the economy improves, etc.
      Personally, as long as the menu is well-designed, and I'm not doing anything that absolutely requires human interaction, I'd rather deal with an automated system. First of all, I don't have to repeatedly explain myself to the automated system about the basics of whatever product or service I'm calling about, because most of the time what I need is one of the menu options. Also, the automated systems usually don't talk in a completely incomprehensible drawl.
    49. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sue him for emotional damage.

    50. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Verbal abuse.

      The fucking way to go, bitch.

    51. Re:YEEEHAAAA by skorpion_of_ranax' · · Score: 1

      "...but all your customers are happier in the long run..."

      Ahh, but that brings us back to Customer Service and we all know that is a term that corporations and business in general no longer care for or understand.

      I remember Customer Service; God, I'm old...

      --
      --- skorpion_of_ranax
      "A computer without a Microsoft OS is like a dog without a brick tied to its head"
    52. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      "Son of beetch! Sheet!" == http://imdb.com/title/tt0083131/

      "J00 fargin' iceholes!" == http://imdb.com/title/tt0087507/

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    53. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, you're a fucking asshole and you know it.

    54. Re:YEEEHAAAA by cfuse · · Score: 1

      I am the call centre/telecomms admin where I work. I get the benefit of being on both sides.

      As an admin, I am constantly explaining to the department managers that to answer calls you need staff. Difficult concept, I know.

      As a consumer of telco services, the only way to get any service is to be an A grade cunt. The squeeky wheel gets the oil.

    55. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Bullshit, you're a fucking asshole and you know it.

      Such foul language, as befits one who lacks a logical argument.

    56. Re:YEEEHAAAA by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      The real answer is to put people to work answering the phone. Yes, they cost more than the computer system costs in the short term,

      I have news for you. Businesses make things cheaper because YOU asked them to be cheaper. Now shut up and be happy that you got what you asked for.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    57. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Jumper99 · · Score: 1
      The real answer is to put people to work answering the phone. Yes, they cost more than the computer system costs in the short term, but all your customers are happier in the long run also

      To preface this, IAAIVRP (I am an Interactive Voice Response Programmer) Just where did you come up with this gem? In the short term? No, people will always cost more than an good IVR system. An no, people don't all hate these systems. Granted, they do have their limitations, but on the whole we have had very high customer satisfaction with ours. Designed properly, these systems can do almost everything a human agent can. The systems I work on handles about 8 - 10 million calls per month. About 30% of them opt out to a Rep. That means that 70% of the folks can do what they need to do within the system.
      When we had an equipment failure that caused our system to go down, customers were actually kind of miffed that they had to talk to a live agent. For typical folks, they can do what they want faster and easier than if they had to wait for a rep, explain what they wanted to do and wait for the rep to perform said action.
      And let's not even start on the cost issue. For what we spend on just one FTE, I could by many machines that can basically do the same thing.
      --
      The opinions expressed here are not mine, but those of these dang voices in my head.
    58. Re:YEEEHAAAA by rark · · Score: 1

      the same thing that many other things in society do -- rewards assholic behaviour, punishes 'nice' behavior.

      I've spent a fair bit of time pondering my way out of that connumdrum -- I'm naturally a 'nice' person -- which is to say that I consider the viewpoints of the other people around me when choosing my actions. This means that I don't scream or curse or insult people on the other end of the phone. Even when they are telemarketers calling my cell phone (they get told, firmly but politely, that this is a cell phone and they'd best not call it anymore).

      But it also means that it takes me longer to get things done, compared with my friend who pretty much starts throwing temper tantrums from the get go. I've noticed this repeatedly (with different people). There are situations in which I come out ahead, or get to the same point faster than my friend, but not as many as one might like. And a few times he's been able to wrangle a solution to a problem of mine (dealing with customer service) that I have not, because I won't throw a temper tantrum on the line. Call it having too much pride or something.

      rantrant

    59. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCKING FUCK GOD DAMN IT

      ...oh, what were we talking about?

    60. Re:YEEEHAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a student in high school, and I've noticed pretty much the same thing. In junior high, I was quiet, nerdy, polite, you know, "Nice". People gave me so much shit, I thought I'd go postal. I hated school with a passion. I learned exactly how to use the rules to skip school without getting in any trouble (and did so regularly). And I regularly failed all my classes.

      Then, last year of high school, second semester. I made a few new friends. My personality changed (unrelated). I became loud, obnoxious, and extraordinarily profane (one day, my friends and I decided to try and use "fuck" as every other word in our speech. We did surprisingly well). Someone bumps me in the hall, I flip them off. If they say anything about it, I shout them down with four-letter words directed at their mother.

      I continue to do this into high school. Suddenly I'm not so nerdy. I have quite a few friends, and start refusing dates (a man has to have standards). Fuck this, fuck that, I say. A popular girl asks me out, I tell her to fuck off. If the teacher gives me homework, I call her a bitch under my breath. I am not nice anymore.

      My new, aggressive personality does me a lot of good. I have quite a few friends, and I do extremely well in my classes. I no longer get shit from anyone "above" me in the social ladder (just a couple of assholes on the bottom rung). Yet I'm still a nerd! I'm just a mean, angry nerd now. I still don't quite understand why aggressiveness does this. I don't give the "lower classes" shit (unless they give me shit first), a prerequisite to high social standing. My little circle of friends are all mostly harmless, but we can deal with the elite safely. It defies traditional American high-school class systems, and I think it deserves a closer look.

    61. Re:YEEEHAAAA by rark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, humans have this whole social hierarchy thing, and it is somehow more distilled in high school. And a balanced approach (like yours, though the same approach wouldn't be balanced in, say, an office) seems to be the best way to deal with it. Don't bully people who aren't causing problems, because that's unfair and cruel, and don't back down when other people are causing problems, because that just encourages them.

      The problem that I have is that this system does the opposite -- it 'backs down' and rewards people who are showing signs of aggression and 'bullies' (though I'll grant that's overstatement) those who remain patient and reasonable by making them get in line behind those who are being aggressive.

      From my experience, I think that giving 'lower classes' shit and/or badmouthing them, etc in order to gain social standing is only required if you are trying to gain social standing by joining or trying to gain the favor of the more popular group, AND if that popular group chooses to use negative tactics such as that to maintain popularity. There are other ways to improve social standing, such as not taking shit from anybody, and becoming more popular because people are more drawn to you (because of confidence/charisma is one to think about in your case, btw -- this may have more to do with it than aggressivness) and these tactics don't require negativity.

      Incidently, ignore all the adults who say that this sort of thing doesn't happen in adult life. It does, it just becomes more subtle and 'civilized' (beating up one's lessers gets one charged with battery, as does putting your coworkers heads in toliets).

  3. The possibilities are endless! by trp642 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So instead of dialing 0, I'll just say shit over and over and try to sound as mad as possible.

    I wonder if the system could be programmed to forward to Darl's extension if I were to say the words litigious bastards?

    1. Re:The possibilities are endless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, they got their site back up already?

    2. Re:The possibilities are endless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps your grandmother's modem is not compatable with 9.0 optimized, and you should buy her a NEW one? Maybe it's old and needs an upgrade?

    3. Re:The possibilities are endless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a fucking modem.

    4. Re:The possibilities are endless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Buy her an Indian, it's probably cheaper.

    5. Re:The possibilities are endless! by visgoth · · Score: 1
      "...my grandmother's modem is not compatable with 9.0 optimized."

      Of course not! Do you really expect two cans and a string to be compatible? ;)

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    6. Re:The possibilities are endless! by Talinom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once the wave pattern hits the level the computer is programmed to recognize as the frustration cutoff point, the caller will immediately be transferred to the operator.

      I think that I'll just break out my Sam Kinnison albums at them. THAT should do the trick.

      I was on hold for five fucking years!!!

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    7. Re:The possibilities are endless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fancy a Ruby?

    8. Re:The possibilities are endless! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      "Ow owwwww!" == http://imdb.com/title/tt0090685/

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  4. Dean's scream by seidleroniman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do i get the feeling that when Howard Dean needs tech support on this system, he'll be put through in 0.05 seconds :)

    1. Re:Dean's scream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These jokes were old before people started making them. Right up there with, "Chads! Waka waka waka!!"

    2. Re:Dean's scream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go watch some more TV.

    3. Re:Dean's scream by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Because you confuse enthusiasm with anger?

    4. Re:Dean's scream by Valegor · · Score: 1

      Because you confuse enthusiasm with anger?

      It doesn't matter if a person confuses enthusiasm with anger, what matters is would the system. I expect that it would, especially with the tone that he used. Yes it was enthusiasm and it has been taken out of context, but would a machine read it as anger. I would wager yes.

    5. Re:Dean's scream by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I dunno - is the system merely using volume or does it also take pitch variance into account? It's [seemingly] pretty easy to tell the difference between an angry yell, a happy yell, and a terrified yell - esp. if given the "normal" voice as a baseline. I figure that, if this thing's really newsworthy, it probably takes more into account than simple volume increases that could also result from things like varying the distance between the handset and mouth. :)

      Dean's "blarghlemarth!" didn't really sound much different in intonation than his usual speech, IMHO.

    6. Re:Dean's scream by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Because you haven't heard him when he's his normal, composed self? Seriously, he isn't screaming all the time, despite what all the self-fulfilling prophets would tell you.

  5. Cursing your way to better support by glinden · · Score: 1

    Seems like there's an easy way to play this system. Just start any voice mail maze by spitting a stream of invectives into the phone and you get premium support.

    1. Re:Cursing your way to better support by ZoneGray · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It sorta works, actually... I had to call Verizon support once, and they had one of those voice-recognition systems, where they ask you a bucnh of questions and you're supposed to speak the answer and then they try to figure out how to route the call. I started speaking gibberish, and I was connected to an operator within seconds.

    2. Re:Cursing your way to better support by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 4, Interesting


      The last time I had to call Verizon repair services I was trapped in their new phone system, and my phone line was so noisy (hence the service call) that their voice recognition was not recognizing. I cursed at it a couple of times, and it asked me if I wanted to end the call. I said, "No!", and it continued.

      To test it, I cursed again, and sure enough, it said sweetly, "Would you like to end this call?"

      As an aside, I have had so many problems with my phone line that I now have my own personal Verizon rep, with a direct line to her office. But she seems pretty ineffective, so now I'm composing a letter to Mr. Seidenberg to see if he can get the damned line to work.

    3. Re:Cursing your way to better support by WingNut7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seems to me like they're doing this backwards. If I was the receptionist, I'd be taking the calm callers and transferring the pissed off ones to the automated support system.

    4. Re:Cursing your way to better support by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      I started speaking gibberish, and I was connected to an operator within seconds.

      How much you wanna bet they were speaking gibberish back to this person.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    5. Re:Cursing your way to better support by momokatte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back when I was a Sprint PCS swatter, Sprint rolled out their voice-recognition menu system for customer support. Since I had to call frequently on behalf of existing customers, I quickly found out the best way to get a live operator -- just say "cancel service". The system would play back a "please wait for the next representative" message that sounded a little bit depressed about the bad news, and bump the call to the top of the queue.

    6. Re:Cursing your way to better support by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I've been round and round with Verizon as well, for over two years now: they have a bad DMS station here in Antelope Acres, now going on 18 years old and was defective when it was installed (firsthand info from the guy who maintains it), that limits dialup to 26k and prevents us from getting DSL, not to mention that the phone lines are just plain noisy. And they refuse to replace it. With a threat of filing a complaint with the Public Utilities Commission, I got as far as some mid-level manager, but her job apparently was to make me go away, because her promises to call back "the next day" with a status report failed to materialize, and I was unable to reach her when I called back. In fact Verizon acted like no such person even worked there.

      So.. if you have any tips on exactly who (and how to contact them) at Verizon to accost about this, I'll be most grateful!!

      Tho I'd probably get further by backing my truck over the station box... because from what others in the neighbourhood have said, Verizon claims they "can't afford to replace it" (gee, they had no problem replacing the bad DMS over at Lake Elizabeth, a much smaller market but where Someone With Political Influence complained!) and a mere 1100 captive customers (with no other options on local service) aren't worth keeping happy.

      And yes, I had already discovered that a bit of loud swearing usually gets thru the voicemail bog a lot sooner :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Cursing your way to better support by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 1


      Sorry, it took me a while to get to a reply.

      Basically, the way that I did it was to have an unreasonably large number of service calls, where Verizon determined that my line needed to be repaired, and that the problem was outside of my house. Then, with the next call (the sixth or so within less than a year), I asked to speak to supervisors repeatedly, until someone called me back.

      But I have to say, I think the person who is calling me back now is a pacifier, and that she actually isn't effective. I supsect that I have a mark in my file that says, "Look out, this guy is pissed ! Try to keep him from calling the Telecommunications Commission! If he gets all medieval on you, have him call Ms. So-and-So."

      Either way, I have a soft-spoken, very nice woman whom I can call on her direct line. But my phone service still sucks. So I am writing a letter that I will send to the CEO, Mr. Ivan "I'm putting in fiber to every home!" Seidenberg, and to the Virginia State Corporation Commission, politely explaining how and why I am dissatisfied with his company's service.

      We'll see what happens.

      But if you want your own service rep, just keep politely asking to speak to a supervisor, telling everyone that you appreciate that they are doing everything that they can, but that you just Are Not Satisfied.

      Good luck.

    8. Re:Cursing your way to better support by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I understand the "didn't have time to get back to it" thing perfectly... Answers That Require Thought are most likely to get neglected :(

      Apparently I've already been thru the exact same rigamarole: I made a pest of myself regularly for several weeks, Verizon would then send the repair guy out (it's always the same guy, so it got to be this routine where he'd swing by on his way home, since he lives up a ways beyond me, we'd bitch about Verizon management for a while, then he'd go his merry way), and nothing would come of it. One day I threatened 'em with the Public Utilities Commission, and got the Pacifier Supervisor thing, just like you got. Next time, either they move on fixing that bad DMS, or I file the complaint. (I'm not the only one in the area bitching about it to no effect; it was the lead item in the local "community newsletter" last month, tho they didn't know WHY there's a problem.)

      The repair dude also told me this: Palmdale/Lancaster (THE fastest growing city in the U.S. -- 35,000 to 350,000 in 10 years!) used to have 64 service guys and 8 support people in the local office, and were busy as hell. NOW they have 8 service guys and ZERO support people, all the rest having been laid off, and the remaining people work 12 hours days and still can't keep up. Yet it's somehow *their* fault when they can't get to a service call in the 4 hour window that Verizon promises (in practice more like 4 days, if at all).

      Got him started on management one day, and he ranted for 20 minutes: Seems Verizon is now run completely by managers who've never set foot in the field and have NO clue what the business is about, other than collecting bonuses and "improving" the shareholders' bottom line. (Oh, like this is a surprise, or different from most business how? Have you seen my rants on how outsourcing being essentially this same problem?)

      Anyway, thanks for the CEO's name, I'll have to try accosting him next, since I Am Not Happy Either! I *do* have the "Firmly talk over the other person, carefully appearing to be just about to lose my temper, until they're forced to shut up and listen" trick down pat. :)

      Oh, and Verizon still has protected monopoly areas in California, from back when they were struggling little GTE that was in danger of being overwhelmed by big bad Pacific Bell. Now Verizon has 83% (last I heard) of the local telephone market locked up, but still has protected monopoly status (even tho the Powers That Be told us that was supposed to end as of 1996). What's worng with this picture?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  6. No more waiting!! by shystershep · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Welcome to Acme! Press 1 for-
    Hey, fsck you, you computerized piece of sh!t!!
    Transferring to an operator now. . .>

    Sweet!!

    --
    The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:No more waiting!! by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny

      if (profanity == "fsck")
      {
      customer.type = 5;
      // Nerd with unsolvable Lunix problem, probably
      // complaining that Winmodem doesn't work with
      // self-compiled kernel. Will rant at you for
      // not releasing source to driver.
      hangup();
      }

    2. Re:No more waiting!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cocksmoking queernut. It's "shite" and also please step a little to the left because the brick wall is obscuring a clear shot to your fucking head for being so god damned gay treating slashdot like motherfucking AOL.
      Cocksucker, motherfucker, sis-boom-bah, Bugs Bunny, Bugs Bunny, rah rah rah!!!!

    3. Re:No more waiting!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Who pissed in your Cheerios?

    4. Re:No more waiting!! by goodhell · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's funnier.

      The code, or the sig.

  7. Now if they could just have this for by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    job interviews

  8. That's great... by Mephie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As if taking live calls in a helpdesk weren't bad enough already, now they want to ensure the caller hits maximum frustration and anger before we let them talk to a real person. Great. That'll make everyone's jobs much easier. Oh, and I'm sure it'll increase customer satisfaction as well.

    1. re: that's great... by ed.han · · Score: 5, Insightful

      actually, given that the user can set the app to trigger at [x] frustration level, perhaps not. i'm sure that some will deploy it as you describe, but perhaps not.

      however, my question: let's say dell's call center starts using this. if this fact becomes known, everyone will simply abuse it (a la all the tourette's comments), thereby doing nothing at all to improve the customer call experience.

      so you would have to deploy it in stealth mode, basically: nobody would know.

      also, something that bugs me personally: this system rewards the short-attention span, short-fused sorts, not the calm, patient callers. is anybody seeing this as a good trend?

      ed

    2. Re:That's great... by asr_man · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, this technology shouldn't be used to torture service reps with customers at the peak of their rage. Instead, use it to send 'em to voicemail with a special message indicating that they'll get a priority call back. That'll give them some time to cool off, and give the rep a chance to calmly gauge the priority based on customer type.

    3. Re:That's great... by iconian · · Score: 1

      I guess nice guys/gals finish last on help desk queues?

    4. Re:That's great... by Tassach · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that the system will be used to give the most frustrated callers priority. If you can quantify their anger quotient, you can route their call differently depending on how angry they are. EG: If you're very calm, you go through the normal call routing. If you're moderately angry, you get a slightly higher priority. But if you're *really* pissed, you get disconnected with a message "Our system has detected that you are very angry. Please call back after you've calmed down some."

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    5. Re:That's great... by TGK · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing. The number of people who tell me "there wasn't an option for what I wanted, so I just chose technical support" is astounding. We need to either expand our menu structure or implement this system. I had one woman tell me she'd been fighting the menu for the last 45 minutes. Yikes.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    6. Re: that's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone with an admittedly short fuse: Yay!

    7. Re:That's great... by bwhaley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, better yet, how about having an operator direct the calls. If the company can clearly see that their voice menu system is so complicated that it angers the customers, they need to change what they're doing! How refreshing would it be to call any large company (and I mean any) and have a real, live person answer the phone for once. I know it would catch me off guard.

      --
      "I either want less corruption, or more chance
      to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    8. Re:That's great... by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      Maybe then India will get fed up with dealing with irate Americans on tech-support, and will tell all the US companies trying to outsource call-centers to go fcuk themselves. The solution to outsourcing mayhaps?

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    9. Re:That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree more (why was the parent bumped down to '4' from '5'? Come on!).

      I think it also encourages a pretty rank thing: showing frustration and/or getting pissed off is the only way to get what you want or need. Nothing like taking a few steps back in evolution. What a crappy way to mold society...think I'd rather live in Europe if this becomes the norm.

    10. Re:That's great... by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm sorry, but that's a terrible idea. Customers are used to email responses taking two or three days and voice mails being ignored. Customers know that Greedy Corp is trying to save money by not giving them a live person to talk to. Hell, giving them a live person with language barriers is almost as bad! If the customer feels that they are only going to be thrown aside, they'll cancel service and go somewhere else or (In the case of a tangible product) buy from another manufacturer the next time. In the meantime, they'll bitch to all their friends about the audacity of being routed to voice mail.

      -Lucas

    11. Re:That's great... by magarity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That'll make everyone's jobs much easier

      It will, really, since back when I worked general public customer service I was told to just hang up on anyone who used foul language.

    12. Re:That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't swear at the real human being who you eventually get through to because if it's me, I'll cut you off for being abusive. Serious point, help desk staff are usually fed up to the back teeth with being caught between management incompetence and the truly breathtaking stupidity of some of the callers.

    13. Re:That's great... by asr_man · · Score: 1

      Customer feedback does affect how companies shape their phone service, but being economically competitive shapes it even more. Human operators are are at least 10X more expensive than automated. Businesses just observe what customers do and react accordingly. For most companies phone support is an expense. Charging more for your product/service than your competitor (to cover live support) would simply drive customers away. So it would catch me off guard too!

      OTOH where support is the primary product, live support is a separately priced product category sold to customers. But that is a unique business category.

    14. Re:That's great... by Mephie · · Score: 1
      I agree that's not a terrible idea, but no company is going to use that method unless they have a monopoly on the market. Unless you're a utility company and/or the only game in town, you care greatly about upset customers because if you don't make them happy, they're going to go somewhere else, and you lose revenue.

      That being the case, especially with technology companies (e.g. IBM, Dell, et al), the method you've laid out is the exact opposite of reality. The more pissed off you are about your computer or the support, the more concerned they are about making you happy. They don't want negative word of mouth, and god forbid you get surveyed by PC World when they're doing their service and support report card, potentially lowering the company's prospective grade. In the long run, that could impact earnings. And in an economy where your stock price can live and die by the quarterly statement... some companies will do pretty much anything to keep you happy.

    15. Re: that's great... by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Funny

      Transfer to live agent when it detects a gunshot - either at the reciever or self inflicted at the customer's head.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    16. Re:That's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you care greatly about upset customers because if you don't make them happy, they're going to go somewhere else, and you lose revenue./i.

      well, I don't want assholes who get easily pissed off being my customers anyway. Let AOL have them.

    17. Re:That's great... by asr_man · · Score: 1

      Actually Greedy Corp is interested in responding on a priority basis to customers. If Greedy Corp has a large customer base it will groom calls, sending the most lucrative customers to live rep queues and less profitable/unprofitable customers to automated queues of various lengths.

      You wouldn't rent a horse to a customer that mercilessly whipped it when it was unresponsive. I'd argue that a system designed to harvest and drop such customers on live support agents right when the whipping mood starts probably isn't a good idea either.

      Abusive customers that walk away are not missed by anyone.

      Monitoring the trends in emotional rage/distress of customers while in queue could be a useful metric in assessing customer service effectiveness if it gave more information than average time in queue.

    18. Re:That's great... by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      Well, the reason I stayed with my ISP when I moved house is because when I call support a human answers the phone and says "Hello, Sonic dot net! How can I help you?". I could save a few dollars a month by buying internet from SBC (the local telephone monopoly), but their customer service strategy is analogous to .. hmm.. something real bad that I can't think of right now. But it's real bad!

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    19. Re: that's great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that the BOFH used a similar system. When his system detected that the user was becoming rude and angry, it did something to punish them. Eventually ending up with several major police agencies showing up at the callers house. This is an excellent way to weed out undesireable customers. Those who are left will be extremely polite to the point of being obsequious.

      Problem solved

  9. Anger management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, what, because I am the epitome of human patience I get to speak to machines all day, while captian rage gets transferred to a human automatically?

    What a bunch of complete **** ... oh wait, it works!

    1. Re:Anger management by Grrr · · Score: 1

      Much like... swarming the borders of an adjoining nation to get across by any means necessary, when the idea of amnesty is highly publicized - instead of plodding through the absymally convoluted legal immigration process...

      Both are examples of rewarding the type of behavior that most strains the mechanism.

      <grrr>

  10. Wife? by Gr33nNight · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can they make the software interface with the wife/gf? When I swear, she offers premium support!

    1. Re:Wife? by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 1

      Dude!

      1) Invent software interface for wife/gf
      2) ...
      3) Profit!

      Oh wait...flips to back of local magazine...they beat me to it!

    2. Re:Wife? by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny
      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:Wife? by Glog · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'd like place my pre-order right this second. How much?

  11. May I help? by qw(name) · · Score: 5, Funny


    When someone finally gets through to a real person after cursing their way through the system, it will probably be Helga from the old Kremlin Customer Support. She take care of you!

    1. Re:May I help? by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 5, Funny
      When someone finally gets through to a real person after cursing their way through the system, it will probably be Helga from the old Kremlin Customer Support. She take care of you!

      In Soviet Russia customer support swears at you!

    2. Re:May I help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helga? Kremlin? Methinks you have your "manly woman" stereotypes mixed up ;-)
      (East German women with moustaches vs. Russian women with moustaches)

      That said: In Soviet Russia, Tech Support calls YOU!

    3. Re:May I help? by qw(name) · · Score: 1


      I was going to use Bertha but that would only apply to one of the southern state house customer support lines here in the US.

  12. Old news guys.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telenor has been using this for more than a year now. I fucking like it.

  13. Limited application by grub · · Score: 1


    If it listens for tense, cursing callers then this system will never work well on phone sex lines.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  14. uhh by glen604 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldn't transferring people based on their anger level just make them more annoyed? "I'm sorry, you've sworn too much- I'm transferring you now to our new 'ultra-swearing system'" (insert a series of expletives here from angry customer) "Error- $SwearNum overflow...press Ctrl-ALt-Del on your phone to restart system"

    1. Re:uhh by RealityMogul · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, I envision a special division of tech support to handle these customers.

      Tech: Good afternoon sir, what do you fucking want.

      Customer: Don't get an attitude with me you fucking prick, I pay your salary by buying these shitty products! Let me talk to your manager!

      Tech: Fine, ya dumb fucker, hold on.

      Manager: Hello asshole, do you have a fuckin problem I can help you with?

    2. Re:uhh by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well...if I get to a guy who knows english well enough to swear as well as I do, then that's a major step up. I understand the subtle variations of "fuck". I *don't* understand heavy Indian accents.

      Hell, it'd be like talking to my college friends :)

    3. Re:uhh by Grrr · · Score: 1

      This is strangely... appealing. Imagine the interview process.

      Where would I send an app . . .?

      <grrr>

    4. Re:uhh by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      Feel free to e-mail your resume to jobs@aol.com.

      Put "ATTN: Fuckers!" in the subject line to expedite processing.

    5. Re:uhh by aelfwyne · · Score: 1

      Oh, so they get the New York office, while the rest of us get Inida. Great :)

      --
      -- If it ain't broke - overclock it more.
    6. Re:uhh by foobario · · Score: 1

      Wooohoooooooo!!!

      Sign me up, this sounds like the job for me. Bastard.

  15. Old-fashioned way: by PhxBlue · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just hit 0 until the automated system gets frustrated and forwards you to a human being. It works almost every time, and saves you the frustration of dealing with the automated system in the first place.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    1. Re:Old-fashioned way: by Broodje · · Score: 2, Informative

      That doesn't always work - You get a lot more 'Invalid seletion' replies to that tactic these days. I tend to stick to businesses that have an online customer service. Airline, Car rental, and Hotel is all online now... Only pisser is dealing with the phone company itself, or my utilities like gas/electric/water. Hell maybe that's online too these days..

    2. Re:Old-fashioned way: by rbolkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about a real old fashioned way: use a pulse/rotary phone?

    3. Re:Old-fashioned way: by lambent · · Score: 5, Interesting


      Sometime the trick is dialing 0-0. Or *-# or some weird combo. Or, you can try dialing random extensions to get in touch with a real person who has nothing to do with your problem at all, but they'll be happy to transfer you to the correct department.

      However, lately it's been sometimes happening that when I try this I get immediately disconnected.

      They're catching on.

    4. Re:Old-fashioned way: by inittab+ayanami · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or you could just follow the options like your suppose to to get to the right department so when you do get through we dont have to transfer you all over the place.

    5. Re:Old-fashioned way: by donutz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just hit 0 until the automated system gets frustrated and forwards you to a human being. It works almost every time, and saves you the frustration of dealing with the automated system in the first place.

      I don't know if I'd go so far as to say "almost every time." In my experience, it's probably about 50% effective. Sometimes you need to dial 9 to get a human, and some systems haven't even let me get to a person no matter what I tried.

    6. Re:Old-fashioned way: by Broodje · · Score: 0

      Once I needed to contact the president of a company and I didn't know his extension. I started my brute-force hack with: 0-0-0, then 0-0-1, "Hello, You have reached the desk of [president] blabla". Anyhow.

    7. Re:Old-fashioned way: by stewby18 · · Score: 1

      Another winner is to simply sit and wait when presented with options. I've found that works on most systems that give you "invalid selection" responses.

    8. Re:Old-fashioned way: by scherbi · · Score: 1

      The truly old fashioned way is to use a pulse dial phone, or, lacking that, don't press *any* buttons. The system will figure you can't send tones and give up, handing you off to a human. It's worked every time for me.

    9. Re:Old-fashioned way: by platipusrc · · Score: 1

      There are actually systems that end their spiel about options with: "and if you are dialing from a rotary phone, please hang up and call back with a touch-tone phone."

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
    10. Re:Old-fashioned way: by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      But then you have to wait for a timeout ('cause some people are *really* slow to push buttons). Waiting sucks. I want to yell at someone NOW!

    11. Re:Old-fashioned way: by M.+Piedlourd · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what these loathsome voice-driven phone systems were meant for: to prevent "wasteful" contact with human customer service representatives by allowing customers to state what they want in clear language without navigating a byzantine menu hierarchy. What the geniuses who came up with this idea failed to take into account is that there is no substitute for human contact! People want to explain their problems to a person, not guess at what the machine wants to hear. The sheer amount of customer distemper that leads to the invention of an "anger detector" is an obvious testament to just how unready for prime time voice-driven menu technology is.

      Those tasks that phone systems are good at, such as billing functions, can be done just as well through DTMF systems, in my opinion. Until this menu technology can simulate human conversation beyond (or just short of) the Turing test, cost-cutting managers will just have to swallow the cost of real, live customer service.

    12. Re:Old-fashioned way: by nairb107 · · Score: 1

      With most voice activated phone menus I've dealt with you can just say "representative" at any time and it will transfer you to a live person. Only one system actually told me about it. With the others, I just gave it a shot and it worked.

    13. Re:Old-fashioned way: by Mateito · · Score: 1

      > you could just follow the options like your > suppose to.

      One level of menus, no problem.

      Two levels of menus... I can live with.

      Its when you hit the pricks who have 5 or 7 levels of voice menus and minutes of recorded messages that you can't escape from that wastes 20 minutes of your time that shit me to tears. No, I don't buy from companies who do this (I changed my house and car insurance for exactly this reason), but government departments love it.. and they usually have a monopoly.

    14. Re:Old-fashioned way: by invckb · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The best call center support I ever recieved was from the phone company. The reason was because the number was tagged as being owned by a person who only spoke Vietnamese.

      When I called in for service, I was connected directly to a fairly knowledgable guy who had already heard the of problem (and remembered it). Once I re-explained the problem, he connected me to an engineer right away.

      I am guessing that a lot of the big support operations have special groups to support specific types of customers. If you can get listed as one of those types, you are set.

    15. Re:Old-fashioned way: by Colol · · Score: 1

      This used to work incredibly well if you had to call one of Microsoft's support numbers that demands a product ID. Enter an ID, you get to sit through the hold queue and then talk to someone who asks you what product you're calling about. Enter 0, the system deems it invalid and directly connects you to a rep.

      I'm not sure if it still works, but it was useful in its day. Maybe the call system even does something with a product ID if you enter one now (it's a long shot, I know).

    16. Re:Old-fashioned way: by yoink! · · Score: 1

      Or go to the company website... download their Annual Report and get the phone number for their corporate switchboard... and get in touch with a real human... fast!

      http://www.macwhiz.com/articles/art-of-turboing.ht ml

  16. Bonus for me... by velo_mike · · Score: 1

    Since I've seemed to replace half the words and most punctuation with the word f*** when speaking. I f***ing knew my filthy f***ing mouth would f***ing come in f***ing handy one f***ing day. Mom will be so proud.

    --

    At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
    Alan Greenspan

    1. Re:Bonus for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this word "f***" you speak of? The word is "fuck".

    2. Re:Bonus for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad you never grew up enough to use the word "fuck" without asterisks.

    3. Re:Bonus for me... by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      Too bad you never grew up enough to use the word "fuck" without asterisks.

      You know, it's funny that way. While speaking, fuck just finds it's way into any sentence (job interviews are a real bitch to get through), but when writing, I seem to go back and change it to f***.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

  17. Is anyone who calls happy? by pcause · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is truly useless software. Is anyone who calls support happy? If you are, are you after wading through 100 voice menus and waiting 30 minutes to get to a real person? And, can you be happy when you talk to someone who knows absolutely nothing, transfers you and your call gets dropped?

    A better solution is for companies to simply provide good technical support staffed by knowledgable and competent people.

    1. Re:Is anyone who calls happy? by p2sam · · Score: 1

      I always press "0" the first chance I get. I am convinced that navigating those menus will not get me to a human any quicker. BTW, pressing "0" will get you to an operator queue.

    2. Re:Is anyone who calls happy? by stand · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between being happy and being polite. I don't have to be the former to be the latter. It's even possible to express great displeasure and still be polite, try it sometime.

      No argument about your last line though.

      --
      Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
    3. Re:Is anyone who calls happy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also American tec h support people not stupid sand niggers from india

    4. Re:Is anyone who calls happy? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      I think companies who compete with each other, are interested in serving only the most profitable customers. They don't care if the one out of 10 people that calls tech support buys their next product because the other nine who never called will buy it anyway. Their competition is welcome to provide a higher level of service to the 1/10 of the marketshare that needed to acutally use the tech support number. In the end, the company that provides the shittier service is more profitable or is able to offer the product at a cheaper price than the company with the good service. The company with good service goes out of business because the 1/10 who need tech support don't know who they are until they discover that they are missing some driver, so they buy the cheap product with bad service too. Probably only 1 out of 100 become irate enough to actually pay the competition more next time they buy something for service they probably won't need to use.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    5. Re:Is anyone who calls happy? by sporty · · Score: 1

      yes, 'cause sometimes I call to find out information that's not readily available. I.e., "I'm thinking of switching credit cards." or "I'll like to switch my cell phone number. " or "Can you link this bank account with this other one?"

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    6. Re:Is anyone who calls happy? by stimpleton · · Score: 1

      Fair comment. Many other organisations manage to provide good service to their customers, who, by nature may be not be in the best frame of mind.
      Its amazing how many miss this point in their business plan. - Lawyers: their customers are very likely in some trouble. - Plumbers, rescue people from their burst pipes. - Mechanic needed when your car leaks coolant every where and suggests you will not make that appointment. - Doctors. Whoo boy. The point is, many industries do gear themselves to 'rescuing' their customers, and are somewhat succesful at it. Odd that many services that provide phone based support miss the boat entirely here.
      Is it human nature that causes us to misbehave to customers when there is no chance of physical contact? And therein lies the crux of the problem, perhaps.

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
  18. Great... by Ghengis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now when all the operators are "currently busy" helping other customers and I'm still stuck yelling at a machine, I'll know it's because the Adrew Dice Clay's of the world have priority over be due to their mouths.

    --

    "The best laid plans of mice and men gang oft agley..." - ROBERT BURNS

  19. I don't mind meus by secondsun · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't mind menus that much, but what I hate are the 20 minute hold times after you break out of them to be transferred.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  20. Bah by Experiment+626 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I prefer to press "0" at the automated phone tree, and save the outbursts of profanity for the morons who tell me they can't help me with my billing problem.

    1. Re:Bah by inittab+ayanami · · Score: 1

      usually the reason they cant help you with your billing problem is because you decided to nail 0 a few times at the phone system instead of waiting 2 seconds for the billing option and getting to the right department.

    2. Re:Bah by Kris2k · · Score: 1

      Bah, that works, but don't feel soo lucky when you end-up talking to a human being.

      They can always throw you back into the holding queue

    3. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have Sprint too?!

  21. Customer Scripts by manganese4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am sure the people who sell search engine how-tos will be churning out scripts for customers to properly ramp up their anger.

    If service agent says "blah blah blah" you respond "yada yada yada" for 10 anger management points but pause for 3 seconds during your statement to ensure that you anger velocity quotient does not exceed 50 fcks/min

    --
    I make my face look like this and concerned words come out.
  22. I can just hear it now... by mr_resident · · Score: 5, Funny

    The automated attendant at Dell:

    Thank you for calling Dell's Customer Support Line. If you're experiencing a frustrating issue, please drop the F-bomb now..

    1. Re:I can just hear it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it'd only work if you yell the profanities in Hindi.

  23. Oy! by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

    +1, Rimshot! :)

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  24. when i get angry on the 'phone, i don't swear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but i can get *very* sarcastic and then (if really pushed) i speak very slowly. Will the system detect that?

  25. I know a few companies that should implement this by HellKnite · · Score: 1

    I've recently gone through tech support from a few different companies that use voice recognition based menus. I don't know what the problem is, but I have a deep voice, and every time I try to get somewhere with these menus, they seem completely unable to recognize what I'm saying. Hence, I'm sure with this system implemented, and assuming it actually works, I would have been transferred to a real person to get assistance much earlier.

    Of course, if the voice recognition system doesn't know what I'm saying, maybe the stress level detection will be confused as well.

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Dying communication skill by The+Taco+Prophet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Word processors have destroyed my ability to spell. So now call centers will destroy my ability to speak without profanity, right? Wait... working in software has already done that. :)

  28. Also used for detecting lies by FePe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read in a newspaper in the train that this technology also can be used to detect lies. A lie-meter would be shown on the telephone indicating how much the other person lies. Finally a a useful technology.

    --
    "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
    1. Re:Also used for detecting lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, electricity is not a useful technology? Take your rhetoric and shove it, assfuck.

    2. Re:Also used for detecting lies by mrzaph0d · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, when i'm trying to get past the tier 1 support guy by saying "yes, i rebooted", "yes i reinstalled windows" (on my linux box), "yes i reformatted my hard drive and made sacrifice to the gods of cable connectivity", even though i haven't and i know its a problem on their end, i don't want them to know i'm lying...

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    3. Re:Also used for detecting lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I read in a newspaper in the train

      I read your comment on a computer monitor in the room.

    4. Re:Also used for detecting lies by Grrr · · Score: 0

      Bullseye. Thank you. The rigid script some of these poor tech support people have to follow (in lieu of cultivating problem resolution skills) forces one to lie when asked completely irrelevant questions ("A BSoD? Uh, when was the last time you calibrated your printer?").

      It can only be hoped that this lie-detection technology is more reliably accurate than polygraphs...

      <grrr>

  29. do the opposite: why not just drop them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the companies have any sense they would simply 'lose' abusive callers before they get through to an employee.

    Why should they waste their time with people who quite obviously won't want to do business with you in the future?

  30. Not going to work in practice by tomalpha · · Score: 1

    As has been amply demonstrated above, anyone who shouts at one of these things will get bumped to the front of the queue. Thus everyone will shout at them and everyone will get bumped to the front of the queue and so on ad infinitum. All that is except for the quiet little old lady waiting patiently on the end of the phone because the nice recorded voice told her that her call was 'very important to us'.

  31. solvign the wrong problem by earlytime · · Score: 4, Informative

    How about writing aprogram what actually helps solve the users' suport request? Isn't the real purpose of an automated calling system to do that without having to hire a real person to answer FAQs?

    My problem with phone support is that is seems to take so long to establish that I know what i'm talking about, and trying to tell them what I need. It's rare that I call tech support and actually need them to diagnose a problem for me. It would be nice to have a customer profile that incorporates a product proficiency quotient(tm). so that I can go right to an engineer or product replacement on an issue I can diagnose myself.

    --

    1. Re:solvign the wrong problem by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no, the problem is minimizing service costs. They want to provide the minimum service they can get away with. No service qualifies as such and so if they can discourage you and have you dump out of the queue, they win.

      HTH

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:solvign the wrong problem by TGK · · Score: 1

      Several problems with this idea.

      1.) As far as I know a company can not refuse to tell you the information contained in your file. Thus, when Aunt Betty calls in and the topic of her PPQ comes up, she'll be mad as hell when she finds out she's categorized as "vapid bafoon."

      2.) Even in the case of the technicaly inclined, there is the (substantial) risk for abuse of this system. EG - Video failure for a component device. Yes you could test every single cable and then call support, but a fair number of people would go through three "self diagnosed" components before they decided it was time to get back there and start testing. The company can afford to eat the cost of only so many devices and shipping costs before this becomes a problem.

      3.) God help you if they don't want the product back. Logitech is like this. If your system is under warenty they don't want you to ship the broken one back to them. I know more than a few people who have gotten 3 or 4 free keyboard/mouse sets out of them for their friends and family by claiming damages w/in warrenty.

      I'm sure there are other problems. A fair number of people will call me at work and ask for the engineers right off the bat. Out of 10 calls like that I can solve the problem 9 times. The engineering staff is payed more than me and typicaly has a deeper call queue than I do... why should I waste their time?

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    3. Re:solvign the wrong problem by 1029 · · Score: 1

      That is such a short-sighted view, it is quite obvious you aren't any kind of buisness owner. "No service" most certainly is NOT a good way to minimize costs, unless of course your user base doesn't really want service when they buy your product. But in that case you wouldn't have a call center to begin with.

      If a business sets up a service center it is because to get and KEEP their customers they need support. Simply pissing people off just makes them leave. I must ask, do you even have a job at all?

      Where I work I program, but I also do support from time to time. Customers can and WILL ditch our product if we don't give them good enough support. It has happened before, and we've had to bitch at support guys to shape up or else.

      It is true that any company will try to minimize costs, even on support. But that basically means doing the minimum the customer wants/needs, not just blowing them off totally. That thinking just makes you go bankrupt, and that isn't a very good way to maximize profits is it?

      Good god, how your post got modded as insightful I can't understand. Must be all the code monkeys around here taking the party line of "Business evil! EVIL!."

      Anyhow, /rant mode off. Just had to get that off my mind.

      --
      - I love animals. I try to eat at least one a day.
    4. Re:solvign the wrong problem by Chibi · · Score: 3, Informative
      My problem with phone support is that is seems to take so long to establish that I know what i'm talking about, and trying to tell them what I need. It's rare that I call tech support and actually need them to diagnose a problem for me. It would be nice to have a customer profile that incorporates a product proficiency quotient(tm). so that I can go right to an engineer or product replacement on an issue I can diagnose myself.


      While you might know what you're talking about, there will be plenty of people out there who don't, but think they do. If automated systems had this option, it'd get so flooded it would basically be useless.

      You're basically asking people to admit their ignorance. While there are thankfully some people out there not afraid to admit they don't know something, you'll get plenty of stubborn people who refuse to admit they don't know what's going on, even when calling for tech support.

      --
      If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
    5. Re:solvign the wrong problem by 1029 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, BTW, if you think I am just talking out of my ass, here is some proof of concept, so to speak.
      Dell brings some support back to the US.

      See, customers weren't happy with Dell's outsorced support to India, so Dell adjusted. They didn't just say "Hah, screw you customer. Take a dive off a bridge!" Dell did exactly what it should. It tried a new system to maximize profits (minimize costs, whatever), but in this case it didn't work too well. Oh well. Live, learn, correct the problems and try new ideas. But in the end they still want to make their support work for the customer, because the customer IS profit.

      --
      - I love animals. I try to eat at least one a day.
    6. Re:solvign the wrong problem by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      1.) As far as I know a company can not refuse to tell you the information contained in your file. Thus, when Aunt Betty calls in and the topic of her PPQ comes up, she'll be mad as hell when she finds out she's categorized as "vapid bafoon."

      As far as I know, unless I'm in a federally-regulated industry (credit reporting, banking, etc), there's nothing that says I even have to admit I have a file on you, let alone have to disclose what's in it.

      For example, on your file, I would put MBA after your name. I'm sure you would find that flattering, but to me, it means "Makes Bad Assumptions".

    7. Re:solvign the wrong problem by plopez · · Score: 1

      You are not wrong. But a couple of things to consider:
      1) corporates (HP, IBM, MS etc.) are set up for short-term gains. Managers are going for quarterly bonuses and stock options so the name of the game becomes 'make a bunch of bucks then jump from a sinking ship'.

      2) Most support is outsourced. THe outsourcing company rarely gives a rat's ass about the company they are supporting, all they want to do is maximize thier profit (isn't this what Economics 101 tells us to do?). So if they are paid flat-rate, the fewer calls get through, the more money they make. If there are statistics to be kept, make sure that folks dumping out of the queue are not counted in the hold times. I have worked outsourced support and I have seen it in action.

      3) In a perfect world, if there is competition (as in the niche where your company appears to be) customer pressure would work. But for large corps who have a strangle hold on the market, who cares? The customer has no options.

      4) I am a great believer in Deming's techniques. Deming's approach was to build a business which did not require customer support (idealized to be sure, but a great approach, there will always be things that break). So if your products are very good you save huge sums on service and have a very satisfied customer base. And in fact I find any other approach morally and ethically corrupt.

      My rant is that you would think that some 50 years since he introduced these ideas and 30 years after the Japanese used them to kick the American car makers' collective ass, managers would understand this. Apparently not, which leads me to another rant and so I will stop.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    8. Re:solvign the wrong problem by jelton · · Score: 1
      My problem with phone support is that is seems to take so long to establish that I know what i'm talking about, and trying to tell them what I need. It's rare that I call tech support and actually need them to diagnose a problem for me. It would be nice to have a customer profile that incorporates a product proficiency quotient(tm). so that I can go right to an engineer or product replacement on an issue I can diagnose myself.

      My job is to provide phone support. Every user believes that they are an expert computer user. Some of them even are. But an expert user doesn't troubleshoot problems everyday, nor do they know the shortcuts that any phone tech is likely to know, if for no other reason than because we do it everyday.

      Besides, it's not like we want to keep cranky, imperious know-it-alls on the phone any longer than we must (to keep our jobs).

      --
      I am not a lawyer. This post does not constitute any form of legal advice.
    9. Re:solvign the wrong problem by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      In the short term maybe with respect to their tech support cost. In the long term it will cost them in sales due to the fact that their customer satisfaction is in the tank.

    10. Re:solvign the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was it the BOFH said? You don't just want to make them stop calling, you want to make them fear calling.

    11. Re:solvign the wrong problem by 1029 · · Score: 1

      I'd certainly agree that some companies just want the quick buck before going under (SCO comes to mind), but come on: IBM, HP, MS!?!? How long have they been around now? You think you get to monopoly status by going for short-term gains then jumping ship? I certainly don't.

      That said, I will agree that plenty of places have horrid customer support, but again I think that is either because of a flawed business plan (read: company soon going under or being restructured), shitty support being all the customer base really wants/needs to pay for, or (as in my phone providers case, and boy do they have shitty support) a monopoly (usually afforded by lame gov't regulations that keep startups from forming easily).

      But mainly I just wanted to point out that business isn't about shafting the customer on support, usually, because that doesn't make much money.

      --
      - I love animals. I try to eat at least one a day.
    12. Re:solvign the wrong problem by markdd · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. I work tech support for a fairly large ISP, and I much prefer dealing with clueless customers who can follow instructions, rather than know it alls that refuse to countenance the possibility that since nobody else is having the problem, it might be a problem with their rickety network setup.

  32. squeeky axl by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    As they say, the squeeky axl gets the grease.

  33. Piss-poor customer service is priority #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The fact that such a system is even being developed is proof that an overwhelming number of people detest being put through an automated phone system.

    Instead of giving live support (and thus eliminating the entire problem alltogether), money and resources are being spent on bandaids such as these.

  34. Hmmm... by supersam · · Score: 1

    ... now we need an auto dialer kinda instrument that dials the support centre number and starts cursing/swearing non-stop till the system on the other end transfer you to a customer support executive!

  35. Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Fuck That. Be Nice Bitch.

  36. Time to Update Recordings by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 5, Funny

    For account assistance, press or say ONE

    If you know your party's extension, press or say TWO

    For a staff directory, press or say THREE

    To speak with an operator, press FOUR or say "SHIT SHIT ASS DAMN"

    To repeat this menu press *

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Time to Update Recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew these kinds of jokes would happen when an article about curse words showed up. Do you think you guys could tone it down a shade? Maybe cover up the swear vowels with *s instead, for the younger readers at least? Thanks.

    2. Re:Time to Update Recordings by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      Sorry,
      I intentially used what I consider less offensive words. But I suppose they are still not words I'm proud to use.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    3. Re:Time to Update Recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What younger readers? If you're reading Slashdot, chances are you've seen SHIT and FUCK in print. And why the hell do people type F*CK instead of FUCK?? We all know what it means. Does the asterick someone change the meaning of the word?

    4. Re:Time to Update Recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F*SK is used by geeks who are afraid they will be picked on for using FSCK as a swear word. Most people tend to assume that the person actually means fuck, hence the confusion.

    5. Re:Time to Update Recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't apologize, I wasn't serious at all. Someone complaining about swears, on Slashdot of all places? Come on. :-)

    6. Re:Time to Update Recordings by TGK · · Score: 1

      public void rant() {
      I'm inclined to agree with you here. The difference between F*CK and FUCK is a vowell. What's so offensive about the letter "U?"

      The people who insist on this are prudish and quite frankly oversensitive. More so if they feel somewhat better about it after the removal of the moraly corrupting influence of the letter "U."

      What innocence are we really protecting? I don't know a single 3rd grader who hasn't allready heard basicly every single curse word in the english language (my wife's in public education, I know a lot of 3rd graders). Will they be transformed into black leather wearing, public building vandilizing, heroin shooting punks by seeing curse words in print or on TV? Doubtfull.

      I'm not saying we should sit little Johnny down in front of Pulp Fiction rather than the Micky Mouse Club, I'm just saying we need to lighten up a bit.

      We're teaching sex education to these kids in the 3rd grade. We're showing them images of death and human suffering that will scar their minds for ever. But if they read, or God forbid, use a four letter word for fecal matter we act like they've been watching someone eat kittens or something.
      }

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    7. Re:Time to Update Recordings by Syrrh · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but it's also topical... if you yell "F! Asterisk! C! K! You!", the phone system may not trigger its highest anger level.

      In other news, I wrote my grandma a letter that said "F*CK you!". Don't know why the bitch was so mad, I *did* censor it....

    8. Re:Time to Update Recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Younger readers can use censorship software. I have a link to some free ones you might want to check out.

    9. Re:Time to Update Recordings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Will they be transformed into black leather wearing, public building vandilizing, heroin shooting punks by seeing curse words in print or on TV?
      So that's what happened to my kids!
  37. And if we swear at the live operator? by addie · · Score: 1

    Do we finally get transferred to someone who actually has authority and answers to my questions? Somehow I doubt it.

    Sad and depressing solution for a sad and depressing problem. I've got an idea! Hire people who know what they're doing, spend money to staff the phonelines, take customer service and satisfaction seriously... Wait, that's a bit radical.

  38. But I don't talk to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't talk to automated telephone systems, I just press the numbers, so how could it recognize the stress in my voice?

  39. useful idea .. by dindi · · Score: 1

    Automated phone menus suck.

    Having a working system that actually does something if you curse at the "bot" talking to you is OK.

    I definetely curse at automated systems, and the LAST thing I try when I want to contact someone is CALLING or faxing.

    However maybe companies need more intelligently built menues, not "anger level" measuring systems ...

  40. Irony by derphilipp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but will it detect irony ? "... yes but of course I am willing to take the server offline and install an other operating system so your tool you sold me for a lot of money will work..." Or is the time measured untill you hang up ? If the caller hangs up early he was very angry. If he/she hangs up after being one hour on hold, she was not angry. Analyze who is often angry and give them premium service. Analyze who is not angry and sell them premium service.

    --
    Spelling mistakes: My is english spoken not tongue of mother.
    1. Re:Irony by Savant · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is harsh, unfair, and based on a quite unwarranted British stereotype (although I can provide personal anecdotal evidence). That said, here goes...

      If irony detection isn't a standard feature even in most Americans, how the heck are they going to build machines capable of it?

  41. Dial 0. Nooooo more by savagedome · · Score: 1

    "Thank you for calling ABC customer support. Please listen carefully as our menu options have changed..

    blah blah blah

    If you would like to speak to an operator instead, say fuck or shit, anytime.

  42. Press 1 to @#$% by tackaberry · · Score: 1

    In addition to voice recognition, would the system also be able to identify my level of frustration based on how hard I press the button, how often I press it and how long I hold it down for?

    BEEEEEEEPPP...BBBEEEEEEPPPPP...BEEEEEEEEEPPPP!

  43. another nice at day tech support by azalin · · Score: 1

    Imagine all the nice callers being filtered out or directed to the automatic system. What a wonderfull day at work this could be, when only the angry dumbasses get through to you. On the other hand it finaly pays of having decent music for those waiting.
    And just imagine all the beatifull satistics - Yes we had a 12% raise of angry customer this month, but the good news is most of them will have a heart attack within the next year (rough noise to blood pressure estimation)
    *Q: What kind of computer do you have? - A:Like one of those beige ones.*

  44. Hmm. by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Insightful
    On one hand, this can easily be presented as a way to improve customer service by detecting and addressing angry customers quickly and appropriately. Your normal tech support people answer 'patient' calls, and you set up and train a 'high-risk' support center to handle irate callers. As a normal caller, you end up speaking to a tech that doesn't have to deal with assholes. As an asshole, you get shunted to a person who is specially trained to deal with you. Everybody wins.

    On the other hand, one can readily claim that this is a tool to allow companies to better define and pursue the lower bound of just how little money and manpower they can allocate to customer service. As an asshole, you get to barge to the front of the line and berate live support that much faster; as a normal person, you'll either wait an eternity for support or get angry enough to trigger the system. The callers and tech support both lose, but the company sees an immediate reduction in support costs.

    Now, which way do you all think this will swing?

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  45. Great! by pesc · · Score: 1

    ...new software developed at University of Southern California's Speech Analysis and Interpretation Laboratory.

    So now we only need some new software from the University of Northen California's Speech Synthesis and Invectification Laboratory that can elevate your support calls at the push of a button!

    --

    )9TSS
  46. Re:Your lack of faith... disturbs me... by curtoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, Lord Vader, right away Sir...

  47. That's Sad by errxn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to mention the idea that a company would be unwilling to provide actual human help to one of their customers until said customer was frustrated enough to start cursing into a telephone. Gee, that's just impeccable customer service, don't you think?

    I should know; I've been one of the people cursing into the phone before. This should come as a surprise to no one: the company in question was a major "fast-running" (wink wink) cell service provider. I had recently moved, and was trying to get my number switched over to the local area code. Never have I dealt with so much frustration in my life, before or since.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    1. Re:That's Sad by Enfurno · · Score: 3, Funny

      It would be a terrible course of action in any sight what so ever.. You wouldn't wait outside of your hardware store and hit people in the face with hammers until they beat the tar out of you and then invite them in too shop... Good Day

      --
      Need cheap, customized, and quality bandwidth or hosting on any business scale? Visit www.ENetpresence.com
    2. Re:That's Sad by jacobjyu · · Score: 1

      Well, I would think corporations would want to minimize the number of these urgent transfers. So, it's like they're basically using a Chebyshev criterion: minimizing the maximum level of frustration. However, in doing this, they don't really care how many people get to this level, just that the level is a definite threshold.

    3. Re:That's Sad by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      unwilling to provide actual human help to one of their customers until said customer was frustrated enough to start cursing into a telephone

      I'm sure they've realised this and would only put the 'cursing-redirect' into effect if almost all or all their human operators were tied up already.

    4. Re:That's Sad by errxn · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, I wouldn't do that, but if anyone ever does, I'll for damn sure go down there and sit in the parking lot and watch!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    5. Re:That's Sad by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      Never have I dealt with so much frustration in my life, before or since.

      Obviously you've never tried to get an RMA on a shoddy product from $flybynightcomputerparts.com.

      On my own dime (no toll free numbers here) I've painstakingly navigated down through deep call tree menus that ultimately transfered me into:

      • answering machines where no one ever calls back;
      • answering machines that are full;
      • busy signals;
      • dial tones;
      I felt so burned it reminded me of the scene in an old 007 flick where Klaus Maria-Brandeur has to let go of his hands because the electric shock burn was too great.
      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  48. I am sorry to say by segmond · · Score: 1

    but this is Bullshit! I have been on hold on phone for a long time, whilst that is annoying, it is more annoying to finally get a hold of someone and not be helped. perhaps what they need is a ticket # that can put me in an express line when i call back. sometimes, i have called, waited for 30 minutes, told to get ABC and call back, then I call again, and have to wait for another 30 minutes and worst not even speak with the same person I did. A ticket # that we can just punch in to the phone to get me an immediate response will be nice, said ticket # would be valid for a few hours...

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
    1. Re:I am sorry to say by lambent · · Score: 1

      Some of the better managed, usually smaller companies, have implemented a call-back function. You go to their website, enter in your phone number, and they'll call you when they're available.

      I found this last night on the speakeasy.net website while I was shopping for a new ISP, but I've also seen this while i was shopping for VOIP, too.

  49. For all the help desk homies... by Chagatai · · Score: 2, Funny
    I say that this system would only be fair if the help desk people to whom the calls get transferred get to use explicatives, too

    Thanks for calling ABC Corp, how may...
    Porcupine balls!
    Transferring your call now...
    (muttering) Stupid computer...
    Hi, this is Mike at the Internet Help Desk, how can I help you?
    I think I accidentally deleted my link to your Internet. Can I get it back?
    Holy crap! We have our own Internet? Why wasn't I made aware of this?! Well, restoring your link shouldn't be a problem, unless you happen to be a rhesus monkey suffering from simian hemmorhagic fever. Does this fit your description, little man?
    Uhhh....
    I guess it does! Now, here's how you fix your stupid problem...

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:For all the help desk homies... by karnal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, you hit the nail on the head with your comment: the people on the other end of the line shouldn't have to swear, but should be able (without any fear of a "write up") to be a wiseass.

      I think that would make the world a better place.

      For instance, I would probably fall on the ground laughing if I went to the car service department, and had the guy behind the service desk tell me I'm a moron when I start outwardly thinking about what "might" be wrong with the car... :)

      --
      Karnal
  50. I will now be known as the Tech Support God by bioshazard · · Score: 1

    Considering that by the time I call in the first place, I'm already incredibly frustrated, This must mean that I will be getting through to a live person within 4ns of every call I make.

    It's a great idea, but people will exploit it. It just can't work for long.

  51. YEEHAAA by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Redundant

    It's funny. Laugh.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  52. Excactly wrong by Derkec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate seeing this sort of stuff. Because a customer is angry, you decide to give them better support than someone who treats you well. The obvious next step is that if someone takes his anger out on the help desk worker, they get to speak to a manager / higher level support person. Is his actual problem any more real / difficult to solve than the person who contains their frustration and treats the employees with respect? Who would you rather have as a customer?

    That all said, there is a good use for this technology. Detect where in your phone tree people seem to be getting angry. Log that and analyse that for future use. If there are consistent places in the tree that people get frustrated with, you know where to focus your redesign efforts to make it better. Of course, you may see the anger develop two or more steps down the tree from the unclear question that causes the pissed-offedness. It'd probably take some careful analysis / research to really use this effectively.

    1. Re:Excactly wrong by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      amazing. a clear voice of reason among a few uncreative +5 funny's. You've said everything I wanted to and more.

    2. Re:Excactly wrong by Derkec · · Score: 1

      Hey thanks, I appreciate it. I was also expecting somebody to have written something to this effect and just got angrier as I scrolled down the thread to see an endlist list of one-liners. Guess, I just beat you to it :)

  53. This reminds me... by gotw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once I was calling my bank, phoning somethig like the 5th number. Ring Ring ... hold music, voicing my frustration I say "You Bastards". unfortunately that was the very second they put me through. I hear a yorkshire accent (alliance + leicester, northern bank) stutter at the other end "W-W-W-W What did you just call me!?". Fortunately when I explained I was swearing at the machine and not him, he took it in good humour. Good thing too, wonder what he could have done to my credit rating.

  54. How about a system by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where a human being answers the phone.

    Nothing pisses me off more than being kept on hold by a series of robots. Especially when it's long distance.

    Setting it up to reward foul-mouthed assholes with live support just pisses me off more.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:How about a system by Golias · · Score: 1
      Not to be pedantic, but:

      Nothing pisses me off more than $FOO

      $BAR just pisses me off more.

      Okay, maybe pointing that out actually is a little pedantic.

      In fact very pedantic.

      It just struck me as funny.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:How about a system by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      "Setting it up to reward foul-mouthed assholes with live support just pisses me off more."

      You are now pissed off enough, welcome to live Tech-Support how can I help you?

      Yo Grark
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  55. Just call the sales department... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regardless of what service I want, for understaffed companies, I find it's always quicker to call the sales department (they never have engaged lines or queues do they?), then just ask for the required department. It gives me satisfaction knowing that the odd couple of minutes that the salesdroids have spent looking for the required number is the equivalent cost of having a few extra customer support staff on the line...

  56. Performance Data by cmstremi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could produce some interesting performance data for the support tech. If they can use it as a 'satisfaction rating' along with call time and all the other metrics they track in big support shops, maybe it could identify the good and bad support people. There's bound to be a lot of difference between individual callers, but if the data is normalized over a few thousand calls, it should keep things 'fair'.

    Of course, this assummes that a happy-sounding customer is a satisfied customer. For instance, if a support person had a think accent, was curt, was cursed with an unpleasant voice - whatever. You probably can't dump a guy because he has a bad voice, but you might be able to if you could prove that he isn't as effective as the rest of the phone jockeys.

  57. Press 5 to call the support Tech an idiot by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

    What I hate is one automated menu after another and then 20 minutes of "Your Call is important to us!"

  58. Way to go! by jarran · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fantastic! Lets deal with angry customers by rewarding the ones who are openly abusive, and therefore punishing those who are patient and calm.

    The people working in the call centres are really going to thank them for that.

  59. Already works with real people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I buy a lot of stuff on the web. So, every once in a while, a company will screw up. In pursuing a remedy, I always start out pleasant and accomodating. But once they start in with typical incompentent customer service behaviour, like responding to an email with questions that were already answered in the original email, I start to respond with full-scale profanity and insults. Inevitably the profanity gets good results and usually very quickly.

    In my opinion this is the stupidest way to run customer service. It encourages customers to mistreat your employees. The good companies never let the problem get to the point where profanity is needed, but I am, quite frankly, surprised at the number of companies that have such poor customer service organizations that the profanity route becomes mandatory.

    By the way, I discovered this method one day after going round and round and round with a company so many times that I was completely hopeless. So I decided to vent a little steam, figuring that I was never going to get things fixed anyways and that any self-respecting person would just cut off correspondence once the profanity started. Man, was I surprised at how quickly they jumped to fix things after that, completely the opposite of what I had expected.

    1. Re:Already works with real people by Agent+Green · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having worked in customer service for some time, I have a difficult time getting too angry at them. I usually preface things with "You're not paid well enough for me to be angry with you. Let me talk to your manager." Then I unload.

      The problem itself isn't with the front lines, but with the resources they are given to solve a customer's problem.

      When customers swear at me, I tell them that I am treating them in a professional manner and that I expect them to do so in kind. Otherwise I hang up. One company I worked for had a customer advocacy department, and if a customer got too hot, everything would need to go through the advocate...after all, that's part of what they were paid for.

      --
      // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
      // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    2. Re:Already works with real people by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > #define THE_QUESTION (TO_BE) ((TO_BE) || !(TO_BE))

      #define THE_ANSWER 42

      Seems like a pretty strange question, when no matter the subject, the answer is 1. Maybe it's a rhetorical definition?

    3. Re:Already works with real people by wynndow · · Score: 0

      Some good suggestions, AG. Even though some customer support is very lacking, your suggestions are a good place for CS agents to start. People who get all bent out of shape and vulgar don't deserve special treatment. They need to calm down or else expect to get hung up on. There are more effective ways than cursing your way to everything you want. That's a two-year-old's tactic (without the vocabulary, of course)--scream until you get it. Although we don't have to take the run-around we get from support sometimes, we can be civil about it. Thanks for your comments.

  60. in theory i understand, but still... by s.d. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "For the call center it is frustration -- you don't want to lose the customer because they are becoming frustrated."

    i understand that they want to use the automated systems as much as possible to take the load off of people, but if they are finding that the systems are causing so much frustration that they need to guage the amount of frustration in a person's voice in order to potentially keep them as a customer, then there's obviously flaws in the system already, and perhaps super crazy automated phone systems isn't a great customer service idea to begin with.

  61. Lighten up, tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's okay to have a sense of humour around here. It really is, despite what the mods think.

    Oh shit, IHBT... damn... good one...

  62. Reporting Dead Birds to the State Health Departmen by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tried to report dead birds to my state health department. They didn't care. They *so* didn't care. I don't think the functionary even looked up from her novel while she told me on the phone that they do not take reports of dead birds.

    Now, I know from numerous public service announcements that, not only is the department supposed to take reports of dead birds, but I am required to make them. So I called the Federal CDC, to find out what was up. Naturally they directed me right back to the same State department that dismissed me earlier. I managed to complain my way up the ladder until I reached someone who at least could tell me *why* they don't take reports (legislature pulled their funding.)

    So maybe West Nile Virus will break out in my area, and I will be able to go to DC with the names of the individuals who couldn't be bothered to take reports of dead birds...

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  63. I'll just use this by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    The Buffy Swearing keyboard
    http://www.rathergood.com/buffy/

  64. What I'm Waiting For... by MikeD81 · · Score: 1

    Is for someone to modify this so that it works backwards. If you start cursing... BAM ... right back to the opening greeting. Forget all that stuff about transferring a pissed off client to a live person - I worked a call centre and I was a lot more helpful to people who were patient and not screaming into their phone. MD

  65. But will it work in the UK by tr0llb4rt0 · · Score: 1

    Presuambly *Transfer me to a human being you wanker of a machine!* won't work.

    --
    Worst .sig ever!
  66. Now... by feagle814 · · Score: 1

    If only my computer could recognize love...

  67. Re:YEEEHAAAA simplified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    (auto attendant)Thank you for calling XYZ corp. For support, press

    (customer) BARBARA STRIESAND!!!

    (auto attendant) Transferring to an attendant. Thanks for calling XYZ Corp.

  68. I would really hate... by Westech · · Score: 1

    ...to be the attendant on the receiving end of that queue.

  69. What about diversity? by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    Different languages and even some of the dialects have different tones encoded in them. And these tones from your mother tongue are often preserved when you speak non-native language.

    For example, whatever is normal for a male Japanese speaker might be interpreted as rude and offensive by the system that is targeted at Americans.

    Speakers of the tonal language such as Chinese and Vietnamese will be a total nightmare for this automatic system.

    Do I miss something here?

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  70. I can see it now. by Frennzy · · Score: 1

    AA: For billing inquiries, press or say one, now..

    Cust: F*&k Piece of Sh1t! G0ddamn monkey muther f#$%KER!!

    AA: I think you said "F*&k Piece of Sh1t! G0ddamn monkey muther f#$%KER!", if this is correct, press or say 'one' now....

    Cust: F*&k Piece of Sh1t! G0ddamn monkey muther f#$%KER!

    AA: I think you said "F*&k Piece of Sh1t! G0ddamn monkey muther f#$%KER!", if this is correct, press or say 'one now...


    ad nauseum....

  71. The meek? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful


    If this system becomes popular it will enforce "bad" social behaviour.

    Want better or more expensive service? Swear your head off.
    Want to be treated like an 7-digit number? Be polite.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  72. As if attendants' jobs were not shitty enough by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 1

    Before, attendants would talk to nice/normal people from time to time. Now, only angry customers will get to be transfered to them.

    Also, doesn't this strike you as a system that rewards (1) Aggressiveness, (2) Stupidity ? I mean, how dumb must you be to talk to a dumb machine? Reminds me of that Dilbert cartoon where the PHB enters his address book into his new PDA by speaking the names loudly.

    --

    It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
  73. Uh...this is not that new... by GoChickenFat · · Score: 1

    At least a year ago I contacted Sprint PCS's phone support. I called about changing my automatic bill pay's credit card number and there were no options for that yet the dumb thing kept trying to "solve" my problem. I finaly yelled "give me a fucking live person" and the auto-lady replied with something like "I'm sorry please hold for an operator" and a person answered the phone.

  74. If only American Airlines had this feature by GoodNicsTken · · Score: 0

    OK, I'm going to ask you a few questions . . .

    Please say the arival city:
    "MCI"
    Did you say, Miami . . Florida?
    "NO"
    Please say the arival city:
    "Kansas City"
    Did you say, Stolkholm, Sweeden?
    "God Damit NO!" 0,#,0,*
    Please say the arival city:
    "KANSAS CITY"
    Did you say, Miami . . Florida?
    "FFFFUUUUCCCCKKK YOU STUPID PIECE OF SHIT, FUCK YOU, I'LL MISS MY GOD DAM FLIGHT I'M ALRADY LATE FOR" click.

    p.s. Background noise affects voice recognition.

  75. People cost money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Do you call the company's support line before you buy their product?
    Do you pay more $$$ to shop at companies that have smart, well-trained, live people on their phone lines?
    If you want to buy stuff with high-touch support, you generally can. Just don't expect it to be as cheap as stuff with "screw-you automated phone support".

    1. Re:People cost money by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You seem to be missing the point. Good tech support does not gain customers, but bad tech support loses them, so "screw-you automated phone support" does not really benifit the company in the long run.

      This is why Best Buy purchaced Geek Squad (at no small expense) even though adding on-site product support does nothing to bring in new customers.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:People cost money by Darken_Everseek · · Score: 1

      ...adding on-site product support does nothing to bring in new customers.

      I don't know about that; if I know I can get competent tech support service from a company, I'd definitely consider going with them rather than a competitor. Get frustrated with the service from one company often enough, and you start looking around.

    3. Re:People cost money by Golias · · Score: 1

      But, as the person I was replying to was pointing out, most people don't "know" if the support is any good until they've already become customers.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:People cost money by Darken_Everseek · · Score: 1

      True enough, but by the same token, if someone has been dissapointed once, they're probably going to start doing some research before they buy. If they don't learn their lesson the first time, they probably deserve getting bit in the a$$ a couple times.

      Arguably, you can't "know" how good the tech support for a company is until you've experienced it, but you can probably get a pretty good idea from word-of-mouth.

  76. already in place? by the+idoru · · Score: 1

    i called FedEx to track a package last week. i had to speak in the tracking number, which is about 30 digits long. needless to say, after the second time i spoke the number and the computer didn't understand it, i yelled "why are you SO FUCKING STUPID!!" 5 seconds later i was talking to a real person.

    i guess sometimes it pays to have a short fuse.

  77. Works for cars too!!! by schoolsucks · · Score: 2, Funny
  78. Sears don't take Bitching lightly by your_mother_sews_soc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two weeks ago I made several calls to the automated Sears Appliance Repair system. I was trying desperately to cancel a service call I had requested. The first time I called I wandered through the maze of "Yes" and "Service Repair" and "Cancel" options only to be put on hold for 10 minutes and then be disconnected.

    During the second call I lost my cool and started yelling at the damn thing. My wife came in and wondered what the hell I was doing. I was getting madder and madder. "YES!" "YES!" I SAID YES, DAMMIT!" When I finally got to the point of screaming "YES, BITCH!" the freaking thing said something to the effect of "You have selected 'Cancel' - Thank you" and hung up.

    On the third call I was hotter than ever, but made sure I didn't call it a bitch.

    FED-EX, on the other hand, immediately defaults to a live person on its system if it doesn't understand something. A much more gratifying experience.

    --
    My user name was a mistake. Input wasn't restricted, my bad.
    1. Re:Sears don't take Bitching lightly by Speare · · Score: 1
      I was trying desperately to cancel a service call I had requested. [..] I finally got to the point of screaming "YES, BITCH!" the freaking thing said something to the effect of "You have selected 'Cancel' - Thank you" and hung up.

      It canceled. Wasn't that what you wanted? Was that canceling your cancelation, or canceling the request for cancelation, or canceling the confirmation of your request for cancelation? I'm so confused.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  79. Let me get this... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    So instead of dialing 0, I'll just say shit over and over and try to sound as mad as possible.

    Let me get this straight, you have to try to sound mad????

    Man, who provides your support, I want them!!!

    Ex: 3 minutes of blather and advertising before the menu, option you want isn't apparent so you spend 10 minutes jumping around and going through the blather and ads again, you finally seem to find where you mean to be and wait 20 minutes listening to elevator music which soulnds like it is played through a broken kazoo, you finally get a voice and either it's a recording telling you they are now closed (please call back during the hours you are at work and can't call them) or you do get a human who informs you that this is the wrong department and transfers you to another queue.

    It's not all as bad as that, but if I were telekinetic there would be companies who would find their own equipment exploding in a shower of sparks and a few executives who would spontaneously fill their shorts (loudly) at the most inopportune times.

    Hmm... Inspiration.

    You hear a tinny voice say, "worst customer service, ever!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  80. It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always give the option to speak to an Operator at the outset.

    "this is company XYZ, if your call is some dumb ass thing that can be solved by presssing a bunch of numbers.... press them now! otherwise an operator will ask what you want..."

    My experience though is that companies will use an automated system when they couldn't give a shit about you. i.e. they have had your money already and couldn't care less what you want to say.

    The rule is.

    if it's a call that could make money, set up a free, manned sales line.

    if they have had that money, they must want something the company can't make anything on
    customer queries etc, so stick them in the phone loop and let them deal with it.

  81. TDD users? by billn · · Score: 2, Funny


    User: Hi, we'll be calling tech support today, I'm having difficulty with my internet.
    Operator: Dialing now, just a moment.
    User: Thanks.
    Operator: Automated menu, 1 for customer support, 2 for accounting, 3 for collections
    User: SHIT! SHIT WHORE!
    Operator: Sorry?
    User: Say that. It'll transfer you faster.
    Operator: If I say that, my boss will transfer me faster.
    User: Seriously, just swear at it.
    Operator: No.
    User: C'mon, if you don't we'll both be on hold forever.
    Operator: I'm not going to swear at it.
    User: Say, what are you wearing?
    Operator: What?!
    User: That's the spirit, let's continue. Gimme a good 'ASSFACE BUTTLICKER' so we can get to a tech.
    Operator: There's something wrong with you.
    User: Are you making fun of me because I'm deaf?
    Operator: What? No, not at all.
    User: You are, aren't you?
    Operator: No, I didn't mean it that way.
    User: Like I don't get enough crap from everyone else, now I'm being mocked by a bloody TDD operator.
    Operator: Sir, I didn't mean it that way, I swear.
    User: I'll forgive you if you say "PIECE OF SHIT, HURRY UP"
    Operator: Dammit, no, I'm not gonna.. oh, it's transferring me.
    User: What did you say?
    Operator: Nevermind.

    --
    - billn
  82. 'Find the Guru' game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All companies these days have only one person who actually knows anything. (except Radio Shack, who have zero.) The trick is to find that person.

    When you get to the call centre, the person you are talking to is a just-off-the-boat Irish backpacker holding a battered copy of the 'how to re-install Windows' script.

    Hurl abuse at this person. Ask for their supervisor.

    The supervisor will then come of the line. Don't fall for this trick. They just hand the phone to their mate sitting next to them. Abuse this person as well.

    Now you'll get the call centre supervisor. These people are scum. Be exceptionally creative in abusing these low-lifes.

    You mave need to go thru a few layers. You know what to do.

    Eventually you hear the magic words. Actually, a word. A persons name, as in 'Hold on Sir, I'll transfer you Mike'. Not 'the manager', not 'my supervisor', but 'Mike'.

    Be nice, be very nice to this person.

    They know things.

    They know the answer to your problem.

    Send them a crate of Scotch for fixing your problem.

    (BTW, my name is not Mike!)

  83. SoCal by BrianKHud · · Score: 1

    FIGHT ON!!!

    --
    He who controls the past, commands the future... He who controls the future conquers the past.
  84. Reminds me of Demolition Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real person answers phone:
    "Hi, welcome to the San-Angelas Police Dept, if you would like to talk the automated answering system press 1."

    and
    "Fxxx"
    BOOOONK
    "John Spartan, you are fine 2 credits for violating the verbal profanity act."

    JoeR

  85. Oh brother by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    So now the people who act like jerks will be getting positive reinforcement, while those of us who try to be polite will have to deal with those annoying (poorly) automated systems? Who dreamed THAT up?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  86. Re:YEEEHAAAA simplified by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Belgium!

    An actual instance where dumbing things down for the American market actually improved the work.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  87. Anger detection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no need to detect anger, it is automatic. I'll bet there isn't a person on the planet that is happy when a machine answers the phone.

  88. Simpler Solution by Sumbody · · Score: 1


    Why don't they just program the automated attendant to swear back?

    caller:"Hey, Widget Corp, your product sucks!"
    aa:"Please press 1 if you'd like to go to hell; 2 if you'd like me to insult your mother; 3 for caustic sarcasm; press 4 if you'd like to blow me; or just stay on the line and someone will tell you off."

  89. Now I'm angry. by w3woody · · Score: 1

    I try very hard in my normal life to be calm, polite, and friendly, especially when dealing with technical support people who quite honestly aren't the ones at fault.

    And now there is a device which will penalize me for being a polite person?

    1. Re:Now I'm angry. by Violet+Null · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Society penalizes you for being a polite person already.

      The 'jerk' effect is pretty common: given someone who's not complaining and someone who is, the establishment will take care of the person who's complaining first, in order to get them to shut up. No one likes the jerk, everyone likes the polite person, but the jerk will get seated at a restaurant first, will get their money back easier when returning something, and the like.

      As a polite person, the establishment knows they can ignore you for a long time. But the jerk will cause them problems immediately.

      Sad but true.

    2. Re:Now I'm angry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's usually some kind of hidden cost to the jerk, though, even if he doesn't realise it.

      For instance, in the restaurant scenario, who knows what unrequested condiments might work their way into his food...

    3. Re:Now I'm angry. by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's true. I am what most people would generally call polite, but I've found that when trying to get "service", it's best to simply go into jerk mode right from the start.

      George Carlin said it best...

      At one time in my life, I thought I understood the meaning of the word "service." The act of doing things for other people.

      Then I heard the terms:
      Internal Revenue Service
      Postal Service
      Civil Service
      Service Stations
      Customer Service
      City/County Public Service

      And I became confused about the word "service." This is not what I thought "service" meant.

      Then one day, I overheard two farmers talking, and one of them mentioned that he was having a bull service a few of his cows.

      WHAM!! It all came into perspective! Now I understand what all those "service" agencies are doing to us.

    4. Re:Now I'm angry. by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Not always. Sometimes they get led away by the police. Sometimes the polite person will get more and have a much more pleasant time. Especially when it is over the phone.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    5. Re:Now I'm angry. by w3woody · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem is that one can be polite yet still asertive--yet for some reason or another most people only learn that to be assertive they have to be a jerk. And that's why society seems to be turning into a bunch of jerks--because no one knows how to be polite yet assertive anymore.

    6. Re:Now I'm angry. by mttlg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Classifying everyone as either 'jerk' or 'polite' is a gross oversimplification. The truth is that complaining is a fine art, and there are ways to use this art to get what you want without being a jerk.

      The reason why the polite person can be overlooked is because there is no pressing need for attention. If there's a severed thumb in your soup and you sit politely and wait for the waiter to return, you aren't going to get particularly prompt service. If you scream, someone will be over to help you rather quickly. The key is to make your displeasure known in such a way that will get immediate attention but will not seem unreasonable to random bystanders. This has the added impact of public opinion - if a potential customer sees a poor effort to resolve a reasonable problem, that person could choose to do business elsewhere.

      As an example, I once hated doing business with UPS. Since I have no choice but to pick up packages at the local customer counter after the first delivery attempt, I got to deal with the UPS automated phone system rather frequently. It was such a poorly implemented piece of equine excrement that a simple 'will call' request could take 15 minutes (wading through menus, entering tracking numbers multiple times, then explaining everything to a human being, who would once again request the tracking number and your name, address, phone number, etc.). I inquired about having packages automatically held for pickup after the first delivery attempt (USPS, FedEx, and Airborne all do this to some extent, and FedEx and Airborne even have same day pickup), but I was told repeatedly that this could not be done. After calmly expressing my irritation in person at the rather crowded customer counter, my packages started being held for pickup automatically and I received friendly, personalized service at the customer counter.

      They have since stopped allowing automatic holding, but delivery change requests can now be processed quickly and painlessly on the web. Now that those incompetent morons in charge of the USPS have cut back my local post office's hours so much that there is no way I can go there during the week, and with FedEx closing down the office that I drive past every day and moving operations to one that is conveniently located a half hour drive through back roads from where I live (in the opposite direction of where I work), UPS has become my favorite carrier.

    7. Re:Now I'm angry. by Psyrg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are of course exceptions...

      It is my understanding that ambulance officers are specifically instructed to ignore accident victims that make excessive amounts of noise. This is because if you are alive enough to yell for help then you are more likely to survive than someone who isn't yelling for help.

  90. Maybe it's just me.... by g33kgirl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only one who LIKES automated phone systems?

    I hate telephones, and I'm not a big fan of people either. Usually, I'm just calling to find some bit of information - an address, hours of operation, etc. The fewer real human beings I have to talk to, the better.

    As for cursing at the automated system to get a human on the phone...I spend enough time cursing at machines as it is. Besides, what if the cursing has nothing to do with the phone call? "Honey, can you turn down the f*cking television!? I'm on the godd*mn pho...oh, hello?"

    --
    You don't have to be the person you've become.
  91. Get with the program, GRANDPA! by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Dean Scream is so five minutes ago.

    Now it's all about Janet's tit.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Get with the program, GRANDPA! by orthogonal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Dean Scream is so five minutes ago.

      Now it's all about Janet's tit.


      Yes, we must concentrate on these important matters!

      Full speed ahead with the Federal investigation of Janet's tit!

      Do not allow yourself to be distracted from this by unimportant minutia, like:
      • a national intelligence apparatus that never saw September 11th coming
      • but did "see" non-existent yellow cake and Weapons of Mass Destruction
      • in order to justify an ill-conceived war against a regime that, though evil, had nothing to do with terrorist attacks on the U.S.
      • which has led to even more people hating the U.S.
      • and millions in no-bid contracts for Hallibuton and
      • and a bill of at least 87 billion dollars
      • and 3000 American soldiers wounded and 500 American soldiers killed

      • like a domestic "war on terrorism" that has turned into a war on the Bill of Rights
      • including the subpoenaing anti-war protesters
      • and denying alleged terrorists the benefits of counsel
      • and the extension of special police powers like "sneak and peek" warrants originally granted to "fight terrorism" to the investigation of crimes having nothing to do with terrorism.

      • or like steadily increasing government spending, and an unprecedented deficit even as
      • the richest 1% of Americans get increased tax breaks, supposedly to increase employment, even as
      • the number of the unemployed swells to a size not seen in twenty years


      Word is, an investigation of repeated intelligence failures will be postponed until after the election. I guess fixing an FBI and CIA that missed any clues about September 11th can wait.

      Meanwhile, the investigation into Janet's tit goes full speed ahead.

      So follow your government's example! Don't be distracted by these things that don't matter! Concentrate on Janet's tit!
    2. Re:Get with the program, GRANDPA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put the mouse down and step away from the keybord.
      Take you tinfoil hat off and try to have a life...

      "Do not allow yourself to be distracted from this by unimportant minutia, like:"

      FYI it is not that people are being distracted it's they don't care. Now calm down or go blow your brains out.....

    3. Re:Get with the program, GRANDPA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " Concentrate on Janet's tit! "

      It's like it's staring at me....

      Hypnotizing...

  92. Re:If you shoot your phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that be whitehouse.gov's White House or whitehouse.com's White House??

  93. new business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. implement frustration management software
    2. keep angry (high maintenance customers) happy
    3. lose calm (low maintenance customers)
    4. profit? (only if you run a monoploly)

  94. Not in Amerikka by DangerSteel · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia automated attendant curses at you !!! and then tracks you down for re-education in gulag...

  95. Curse your way to life support? by ENOENT · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a bad story about the effects of road rage.

    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
  96. I wonder what pavlov would think?? by amigabill · · Score: 1

    This just seems to be encouraging people to cuss and swear and suffer from anxiety more than we did before... Will we all start being foul-mouthed people in general now, after associating it with being "truely" helpful to us?

  97. I've worked in support by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 0

    And it's still my belief that nobody is allowed to curse at anyone.

    1. It doesn't really help in the long run
    2. You hurt someone's feelings
    3. From personal experience, the people who are nice and polite get better service than the abusive people.

    I can understand that sometimes it helps, but it never helped if people cursed at me.

    If they do it to me on the street They'll be cursing their way to LIFE-SUPPORT!

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  98. Wiggly Things? by toxf · · Score: 1
    Narayanan's program parses speech by transforming it into electrical waveforms. "If you plot these waveforms given off by speech -- those wiggly things -- a high energy will give a greater amplitude, which affects the way the waves come out," Narayanan said.
    Gee paw, how does I get ta wunna dem fancy skools?!
  99. Response Guy by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would like to take this opportunity to request you to please spend the rest of the week responding to the rest of the /. dicks with no sense of humour. You have that special gift of getting to the point and having a good insult thrown in for good measure.

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
    1. Re:Response Guy by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      I would like to take this opportunity to request you to please spend the rest of the week responding to the rest of the /. dicks with no sense of humour. You have that special gift of getting to the point and having a good insult thrown in for good measure.

      Oh, for cryin' out loud.... will this end up /.'s version of NippleGate?

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  100. obl. Life of Brian quote by brucmack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What you fail to realize is it's the meek who are the problem!

  101. Too bad by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    I mean, wouldn't it be best to have someone pissed off to vent on the machines, instead of on a real, live person with real, live emotions?

    Unless they've factored in the risk and costs of sharp increases employee shooting sprees, and they still save money.

    That's why i got out of the (phone company) call centre type job. Maybe i'm a sissy, but i couldn't handle it. 9 straight hours of insults and threats from callers, plus 9 straight hours of insults and threats from my supervisor because i couldn't bring myself to sell a bunch of stuff to someone who didn't need what they got jacked on to start with.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  102. Telewest don't need this. by shic · · Score: 1

    The Telewest telecommunications company (UK) doesn't need this system - they already have a better approach. You call customer services, explain that you've spent 2 months trying to terminate an account, get told that this has now happened, but that they are not willing to put this in writing. When pressed, they refer you to "Customer Services" which don't have a telephone number because they are not "customer facing." The customer is told that if they want anything other than to pay the same invoices already paid then they must write a letter in order that Telewest can more easily ignore the matter.

  103. Most Effective way to customer satisfaction. by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do what Symantec did (still does?):

    Charge for support! That's right, paying for techies or other operators to man the phone lines costs money. We can easily pass those onto the customer who needs them...after all, not everybody needs these services if you can do it yourself. Charging people a modest $2.95 a minute (or $29.95 flat fee!) to speak to somebody will assure an efficient and speedy customer...otherwise they can try the online support.

    Secondly, do as Symantec did and make sure those online documents are nowhere in sight! Hide all information in an idiotic search system that returns 500,000 hits no matter what you search for! (including document ID#).

    Outsource e-mail tech support to a third world nation in which nobdoy speaks English! Northwestern China (near Mongolia) works well for this.

    And, lastly, make sure the second-tier support has a 3-5 day turnaround time (in business days, and don't be open on the weekend) for those nasty calls. And when you do get them, feed 'em cherries and give 'em right back to frontline support with a free ticket number!

    1. Re:Most Effective way to customer satisfaction. by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

      Outsource e-mail tech support to a third world nation in which nobdoy speaks English!

      Who is this "Nobdoy" you speak of? Does he speak English? And if so, why are you making such a big deal about it?

  104. Need better transfer system by RichMan · · Score: 1

    I am pretty calm going through the menus. More often than not I have an unclear decision at some point and end up going down the wrong the part of the descision tree. The end result being that I end up talking to someone who says

    "I support product X, you need to talk to someone else. Try path 4,5,6,1,2."

    Most recently had this problem trying to get support for a Sony monitor bought from Dell. While thinking about which of the options was most appropriate the system auto forwarded me. I ended up talking to someone in laptop support. After 3 more tries through the Dell support tree always following the advice of whomever I talked to, I gave up. It took me another 3 tries through the Sony support tree. 1-800 gives me -> "You are in Canada, you need to phone there". Eventually I got someone who said "Phone Tony" and gave me his number.

    Why can't they transfer me to the right point. That would save my frustration. Also more often than not the options given either don't exist or lead down the wrong path so I have to try again.

    What is needed is a process where once you talk to someone you can be forwarded to the front of other queues. And that there are designated people to sort out lost souls who can't get to the right place.

    1. Re:Need better transfer system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get through Sony Computer support, you want to talk to someone in the CISC in Fort Myers, FL. It doesn't matter if you have a Desktop, Notebook, Clie, or Monitor, nor does it matter if you are in the US or Canada. They handle it all, it doesn't matter what tree you go through. And save your Event Number. Read it off to Maxx and you will bypass the whole phone tree on your follow up call. Oh and call after 5PM Eastern, I would appreciate not haveing to deal with one extra customer, thanks. :)

      What you must understand that the majority of Tech support calls are from people that will not open up thier manuals are check the help files. The number of times a day I have to show how to burn a cd, or hook up the speakers... Anyways, the system is designed so that all those calls are handled by the low end tech support...mostly. Give everyone the option to speak to high level tech support and they will all bypass the low level peons. Granma that can't sign into AOL will want to speak to the engineers.

  105. Voice Prompt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For payment enquiries, please yell "F***"
    For billing enquiries, please scream "S***"
    For all other enquiries, please bellow "A**holes" and have a nice f***ing day.

  106. The financial aspects? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Okay, now, how does this thing relate to the proliferation of pay-per-call tech support? If I curse loudly and long enough, do I get free tech support or do they charge me more because I'm going to be a pain to deal with? And why can't they build a system that detects that I'm calling about a bug in their software/hardware and shouldn't be charged for it? Or how about a system that detects the level of competence of the caller and charges more for dumb statements such as "Ohmygawd! It says 'Click OK to continue' What do I do?!?!?" The possibilities are limitless.

  107. Just do what I do by SupahVee · · Score: 4, Informative

    When you get into a VRU system, keep in mind that a human HAD to set the thing up, and always left a way for themselves to speak with a rep if needed (i.e. testing). So, when you get in, start pushing buttons, a lot of them, especially the * and #, as those will frequently be used for escape sequences. The default action for a majority of systems that do this is to immediately route you to an operator, an operator who has internal extensions. THen just act like you got a bit lost during the 4,3,6,1,8,9.... and ask politely for whatever dept you're trying to get, and ask for an extension in case you have to call back. Works roughly 85% of the time for me. :-D

    --
    "See, we plan ahead! That way, we never have to do anything now."
    1. Re:Just do what I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work designing VRUs and this is not right. There is no backdoor designed for testing to get to a rep. Usually "0" works to shortcircuit to a rep because "0" is understood as a standard for that. However the applications I work on no longer allow "0" input. There are other ways of getting to a rep, but they are dependent on the particular VRU. You can probably figure them out if you think about what kind of people a VRU needs to send to a rep.

  108. Hassle me and I'll redirect you to a black hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://images.somethingawful.com/inserts/articlepi cs/photoshop/01-09-04-space/darthphunk1.jpg

  109. All of you are wrong by caesar79 · · Score: 1

    Everyone seems to be thinking that if you get irate, then you jump ahead to the front of the line.

    The true purpose is to ensure that everyone is happy and calm. If you get irate, you will be warned, asked to hang up and try again...and it will repeat until you can talk normally.

  110. no no no no people!! by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    If you want to know how to properly navigate the voice recognition systems, here is a quick tip. Just like the olden days when if you hit '0' or did not hit anything, it would transfer you to the 'operator'...there are by passes on the new voice recognition systems. Most systems you can simply says 'operator' once or twice and away you go. If that doesnt work, try other things similar to it, like 'help', etc. Then you can curse at it or speak gibberish.

    Note: This works perfect with sprint pcs:
    Sprint- Thanks you for calling if you would like...
    Me- Operator
    Sprint- Let me get you an operator, but first I need some information....
    Me- Operator
    Sprint- Please hold while I transfer you to an opertator.

    And vowala! Try it sometime! ^_^

    1. Re:no no no no people!! by mbstone · · Score: 1

      They are wise to this. You have to make like you are saying something intelligible that the machine didn't understand 'cause it's buggy:

      Sprint: Hi! I'm Claire!
      Me: Why does the porridge bird lay its eggs in the air?
      Sprint: I'm sorry, I don't understand that response.
      Me: Mxyz ptlk. Nov schmoz ka pop!
      Sprint: Let me transfer you to an operator.

    2. Re:no no no no people!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the systems my and my co-workers design usually a couple of misrecognitions, couple of silences, or a couple of requests for an operator will transfer to a live agent. It depends on how much service the company wants to give though as to how well this is followed. Some applications will just hang up on you if you say nothing.

  111. Imagine calling your ISP... by i-Chaos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wife: Did you call your ISP about why they've suspended your service?

    Husband: I tried to call, baby, but I couldn't swear harshly or angrily enough...

    Wife: Don't worry, hun, I'll tell the kids to call them in the morning.

    --
    ...I am proof that intelligent beings are not always intelligent...
  112. That depends. by autechre · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will the general population continue to value "cheap" and "more" above all else? This will force companies to cut costs above all else. "Evil" corporations aren't successful for no reason at all.

    I once heard a statistic that the profit margin from a PC was used up in one tech support call. That sounds a tad extreme, but I remember the tiny, tiny markup on computer parts from when I worked at a small family-owned computer store. When my mom worked at Koenig's Art Emporium, the manager refused to carry anything he couldn't mark up more than 40%. Aquarium stores average 50% (operation costs on livestock must be considered, but the markup is on everything). We probably would have killed for 20 in most cases. It was not uncommon to make only a few dollars on a hard drive. I suspect the situation has worsened rather than improved, and there were companies underselling us at the computer shows (usually with lesser warranties).

    [Of course, being in a small shop, I was building/fixing systems while taking tech support calls, so that wasn't a big hit for us.]

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    1. Re:That depends. by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      Yeah but 50% of a 99 cent fish isn't as much as 20% of a $100 hard drive!

      Grocery stores have a 20% margin as well.

    2. Re:That depends. by autechre · · Score: 1

      Very funny. Tropical fish can sell for hundreds or thousands of dollars each. Cheap ones are maybe $15, and $30-45 is pretty standard. "Live rock" sells for WAY more than it sounds like it should cost, and it's absolutely necessary to have a lot of it for a saltwater tank.

      Also, please read over my comments again; we were making a few dollars per hard drive, not 20% (in fact, we made 20% on few items).

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    3. Re:That depends. by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      it's only necessary to have live rock for a reef tank... and there really aren't that many tropical fish that sell for hundreds much less thousands of dollars...

      there are a lot more computer stores than fish stores, so obviously the fish stores aren't raking it in even with their 50% margins or everyone would be running a fish store...

  113. True Story by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I once had to call SallieMae to figure out why my regular student loan payments had just suddenly increased after 4 straight years of steady decline. I dialed into their oh-so-thoughtfully designed voice mail monstrosity, and proceeded to get routed back and forth into SEVEN different voice mail sub-systems. Each time I was transferred, the new system would greet me with the classic lie, "Your call is important to us". After five minutes of trawling through this POS looking for a department that actually contained human inhabitants, I finally bellowed "HUMAN!!!!!" as loud as I could into the receiver.

    Immediately, I heard a click, then lo and behold, a human voice said, "Thank you for calling SallieMae, how may I help you?"

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  114. Re:solving the wrong problem by earlytime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cutting costs: That's what I meant by "to do that without having to hire a real person to answer FAQs?"

    --

  115. In the ideal world, yes by stewby18 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's good advice... assuming the options lead you to a person eventually. However, more and more automated systems don't ever give you the option of speaking to a person. This is insanely annoying when you just want to ask a simple question that isn't one of the 10-20 that you are "allowed" to ask.

    Good systems subdivide you, give you a list, then have an option to talk to someone if nothing they list is what you want. But for the other 75% of systems, it's good to know how to avoid the whole mess.

  116. AT&T Wireless is the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had a nearly identical experience with AT&T Wireless a couple months back. While calling to report a stolen phone, I had to say "operator" about 4 or 5 times before the thing would give up and connect me to a live person. 20 minutes later, when the live person tried to pick up, my call got disconnected. I immediately called back and asked the computer to "connect me to a f*cking operator!" when it gave me the usual list of options. The computer's response was to give me some error message about my "inappropriate" answer and hang up instantly. After that I had no choice but to go through the "operator" response five more times and sit on hold for another 30 minutes.

    If you have ATTWS service, just pray that you never have to call their customer "support" line.

    1. Re:AT&T Wireless is the same way by valkraider · · Score: 1

      That's why I switched to Verizon.

    2. Re:AT&T Wireless is the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ATTWS contract expires in 2 months. When that day comes I'm definitely going straight to Verizon.

    3. Re:AT&T Wireless is the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      That's why I switched to Verizon.

      Can you hear me now, motherfucker???

    4. Re:AT&T Wireless is the same way by valkraider · · Score: 1

      On a side note - the people in our local "mall" Verizon store get people all day long, walking in saying "Can you hear me now?" - laughing, and walking out.

      Gotta hate when your ad campaign works *too* good...

  117. Who says it will connect them? by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    If I programmed the system, I'd favor slightly annoyed callers over calm ones, and "accidentally" drop the annoyed and angry ones. Just try talking to the manager now, punk. We'll give you service when we feel like it.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Who says it will connect them? by swv3752 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it was say, Dell, they coudl give the angry Tourrettes suffers and Indian rep to speak to and the patient ones can speak to an American.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  118. Frustrated with live support by kefoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    When do I get the system that transfers me to somebody who speaks English as a first language when it detects me getting frustrated with the outsourced tech support person I can barely understand, who needs me to spell basic words for them, and who gives me the wrong RMA number because they can't pronounce "four"?

    I'm not angry or bitter, just frustrated.

  119. Pointless as support options are limited by saikou · · Score: 1

    For example, I tried to call yesterday to cancel old tivo service. Yes, auto-customer-support-system could figure out I wanted to cancel. It probably also could figure out how pissed off I was by low growling. But no, to cancel Tivo you only have to cancel from 8AM to 8PM PST and talk to live person. And if you happen to be able to call only AFTER 8PM none of that frustration-meter stuff will help you, as call center is closed, and while it's easy to sign up for new service ("just click here!" on their web site) there are 15 hoops to jump through to cancel ("sorry, for security reasons you have to speak to a live agent" riiiiight, signing up was security-less? and if you want to talk to a live person for any other reason your wait time is 84 (!!) minutes).

    As companies save more and more money by cutting support staff all these improvements will go on unused, as only automatic support will be available.

  120. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  121. Calling software... by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Now what we need is software that dials the phone and then automatically swears until a live person picks up.

  122. "0, invalid entry" should be Illegal by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

    All Companies who do not have a live operator reachable by dialing 0 should be fined.

    It should be part of our telecommunication rights.

    Yo Grark
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering.

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  123. Re:solving the wrong problem by earlytime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's why you have a "product proficiency quotient"(tm). The customer answers a few relevant questions about the product and the problem that they're having. This (running tally)score gets stored in the customer profile. Each time the customer calls, the phone queue mgmt sowftare decides where to insert the call into the queue based on past calls and their ppq. Mr CCIE gets injected straight to the engineer(L3) queue, no L1 or L2 support at all. Mr "i can't print, and btw aol is slow" goes to L1, and gets the benefit of basic troubleshooting.
    The key is that there is value to each support level, but requiring all users to go through every level every time is inefficient, i.e more expensive.

    --

  124. merge with previous article by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    Too bad we can't curse our way to saving Hubble. {scowl}

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  125. Not really new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Bank used to have such a system, which would basically put you on in front of everyone else in the queue, if they the system recognized you being stressed ( I guess it was just the voice-level that counted).
    I knew this, because a friend of mine did consulting in the same bank.
    So whenever I called my bank, I would start to shout expletives at the waiting music and the "Please Hold"-announcement, the waiting music would change and I was able to do my banking, I just hope they never recorded me, shouting at their "Please Hold"-Woman.
    I guess there is a Seinfeld-Episode hidden in there...

  126. Automatically transferred to FBI by tjstork · · Score: 5, Funny


    (click)

    "FBI, are you aware of what you said?"

    "Ah, I just wanted my DSL to work, and they said to wait three weeks."

    "You threatened to blow the place. That's a violation of federal law."

    "I was just upset."

    "You know that Mr. Ashcroft will do anything to protect the assets of those who invest in the United States"

    "But, why should I have to wait three weeks for service."

    "Sloppy service does not give you the right to threaten American investors.."

    whir of sirens...

    --
    This is my sig.
  127. What I would like to see... by rongage · · Score: 3, Funny

    What I would like to see is a way to route my calls to someone who actually speaks English as a FIRST language.

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
    1. Re:What I would like to see... by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      What I would like to see is a way to route my calls to someone who actually speaks English as a FIRST language

      Sorry but here in England all our Service jobs are going to India.Dell is taking some of their call centres from India to the US but i havent met an american yet who could speak the queen's language without a strange mix of German,Italian ,Irish and Scandinavian accents.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    2. Re:What I would like to see... by rark · · Score: 1

      You know, there are plenty of people who don't speak english as a first language who do speak it fluently. Presumably you merely want the (quite practical) result of speaking to someone whom you understand and who can understand you, rather than the (quite bigoted) result of only speaking to someone who was born and raised in an english speaking country.

      So really, you want a way to route your calls to someone who actually speaks english *fluently*, rather than as a first language.

      (plus, trust me, there are plenty of people who speak english as a first, or only, language who are unintelligible)

  128. Question by TR0GD0RtheBURNiNAT0R · · Score: 1

    Will tech support using this system thats been outsourced to India understand english curses?

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  129. Worthless software by pelsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the most worthless software I have ever heard of.

    The purpose of the automated calling procedures is to save money, not to connect callers with tech support.

    What Pointy Haired Boss would ever buy this? It's a waste of valuable capital (from the perspective of the almighty immediate dollar).

  130. electrical waveforms, eh by ooby · · Score: 1

    Narayanan's program parses speech by transforming it into electrical waveforms. "If you plot these waveforms given off by speech -- those wiggly things -- a high energy will give a greater amplitude, which affects the way the waves come out," Narayanan said.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't energy related to frequency and not amplitude.

    Lambda=hv/E

  131. Back to the shadows again by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1
    The Firesign Theater had this one pegged in the '70s:


    [Clem the Worker and Barney the Bozo are accosted on the Funway. A hologram character is trying to take Clem away to security at the Hospitality Shelter.]


    Artie Choke: Oh, *I* see, you're too frightened or tired to move! Well, just stand there, and I'll send Deputy Dan to come getcha!...



    That album could have a big revival if the suits glom onto this as a bodycount-reducer.

    --

    I bought this house and you know I'm boss
    Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

  132. Your comment is very important to us by harvey_peterson · · Score: 1

    I'm happy to know that when I'm going through a automated system, and I'm talking to the recording ("My call is very important to you? That's great to hear!"), someone is actually listening.

    Why don't they just save the money on developing this application and hire more people to answer the calls?

  133. cmon.... by resignator · · Score: 1

    Slashdot seems like it has a few intelligent people so why doesnt anyone here get the fact that companies dont give a shit what you think as long as they get your money. If they think it will get them more money they will do it. If it costs them money they will try to find a way to cut those costs or not do it at all. What is so hard to understand about this? Corporations are not people and they sure as hell dont have morals. Sure it sucks but dont ever expect it to change.

    --
    "At first, we thought it was just another snake cult."
  134. Bingo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I work for a very large fortune 200 company. I won't say who- but our business involves moving tens of thousands of people per day at 500+ MPH and we're based in Atlanta, GA. :)

    We use a slightly less advanced version of this technology in our call centers. Its a few years old, but it can detect when a caller uses profanity, if not their tone of voice when they do so.

    We use it in exactly the manner you have described- If a caller starts swearing at our of our agents, the call is immediately flagged and the entire transcript is reviewed by a supervisor. If a single agent has a history of causing customers (or potential customers) to swear, well, they won't be an agent very long. :)

    It's a pretty neat system. The fact that we invested hudreds of thousands of dollars in it is a testament to our desire to provide better customer service, dispite what others may say about us. {sigh}

    -Me

    1. Re:Bingo! by Derkec · · Score: 1

      Very cool. I hadn't even considered the posibility of using the system AFTER the call had been transfered to a warm body. In retrospect, that seems fairly obvious. Thanks for sharing.

  135. Much simpler, much better solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like it would be SO much easier to simpley recognize that if a person pressed '0', that they wanted to talk to a person, rather than the menus.

    If I am in a good mood, I will often listen to one menu, and dial a choice. But generally if I start getting multiple layers of menus, I just hit 0 to try and escape.

    The biggest thing that frustrates *ME*, is when I hit 0, and instead of getting an indication of being transferred to a person, either the recording just starts over, or it plays some sort of "BEEP, sorry, that option not recognized". Or even "Sorry, no attendant has been defined"

    Some systems offer non-touchtone callers an option to 'speak' their responses, these could be setup to recognize words such as 'operator' and 'person', and do the same thing.

    It just seems like it would be simpler, more effective, and less expensive, to set up the systems so that pople dont have any reason to get angry in the first place. The first place is making damn sure your system recognizes the fairly universal convention of '0 for operator'

    Generally, places you call that don't, either dont *HAVE* any central operators, just a bunch of seperate departments each with little to no knowledge of the other and no ability to transfer, or they dont have any actual people anyway, they dont want to actuall let you through to talk to them.

    Whats also amusing is that often, either at the start of a call, or possibly when you are transferred to the hold queue to wait for a person, often there will be a recorded announcement along the lines of "For training and QA purposes, this call may be monitored or recorded". I usually end up responding "But not necesarrilly ANSWERED".

    Ditto on "To better serve you, please ("make a menu choice" or "enter your [account/ phone/ SSN /zip /blah /whatever number]"). My shouted response is usually "TO BETTER SERVE ME, *ANSWER MY **MN CALL!"

  136. Fantastic! by pragma_x · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is some slashcode to log off anyone who types in something resembling a troll or a flame. For example, say if someone types 'goatse.cx' or someth!~@($@!(#$*1029348..--NO CARRIER

  137. any one notice. by ghost-hacked · · Score: 1

    Its funny, most ppl seem are asumeing the angry caller is xferd to live suport. the article just says angry callers are transferd. Perhaps they're transferd to an anger managament hotline, or an automated message on how to meditate, or and quick message "Were sorry, due to a shortage of robots, we've had to replace are technical suport staff with real people, your currentangr level excceds estasblished tolerence's, please call again." *click*
    From haveing worked in a pc suport call center before, i've discoverd that some people are just angry, there were angry b4 they called, they'll be angry at you, and the be angry when your done no matter how the call went. this is perfect to detect those "customers" and simply ignorthem.

    --
    --The Titanic was built by proffesionals. --The Ark was built by Amatures.
  138. The fatal flaw by JustAnotherReader · · Score: 3, Interesting
    For this to work, the company providing the tech support has to give a damn about customer service. If they cared about customer service they wouldn't be outsourcing the phone support to India and the Phillipines. If they cared about customer support they would actually "support the customer

    Here's a true example from my life last week:

    • Register.com has put a lock on my domain and will not change my WHOIS informatin and will not unlock it so I can move to a different registrar. My domain register fees are paid up until March of 2005.
    • I call Register.com. They say they have no account data on me because I registered via a 3rd party. I have to call my hosting company.
    • I call my hosting company. They attempt to make the changes through their partners channel with Register.com. Register.com refuses to change the information or to unlock the domain.
    • I call Register.com again. They say they can't/won't help me and to email their partner channel email.
    • I email the partner channel and they say I have to go through my hosting company to make those changes.
    • I go back to my hosting company and provide them with the email from Register.com in a hope that they could use that as evidence to make Register.com do their damn job!
    • Register.com refuses to make the change.
    Is this the way to impress you customers? What good will cussing them out do if they don't give a damn whether they help you or not? No, this scheme will only work if the company in question actually cares about customer service. Most companies see customer service as a cost center.
    1. Re:The fatal flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you need a lawyer. Sue the both of those assholes for breach of contract and then take your business elsewhere.

    2. Re:The fatal flaw by Mazel#Tov · · Score: 1

      I didn't have the same exact problem, but a couple of years ago, register.com started sending me emails telling me they were going to start auto-renewing a handful of domains I had transferred to godaddy.com a while back.

      I sent them a few friendly emails telling them they didn't have those domains in their system anymore. They blew me off, and we went a few rounds of pointless email.

      Finally, I sent them an email telling them I did not feel the matter was being resolved to my satisfaction, and I was going to have to discuss this with MasterCard and my attorney to see if there were any legal actions that might need to be taken.

      Note, I didn't say I was going to sue them. I said I was going to look into the matter to see if there was any reason to do so. A threat of a threat, if you will.

      I got a call the next morning, and everything was worked out to my satisfaction in about 5 minutes.

      --
      Opinion: Scientology is a cult you should avoid. Follow the
  139. AT&T by hackman · · Score: 1

    You must be talking about AT&T wireless. I had an incredibly bad experience with them - billing problems, absolutely incompetent customer service at best and infuriating at worst. I spent 6-8 hours on the phone with those bastards to resolve inappropriate charges, I've never dealt with an insurance company that bad! And if you buy your phone through the web those handy stores near you won't help you!

    Fortunately all that happened in the first 30 days so I didn't get screwed on the early termination fee. Down with AT&T wireless.

    --
    __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    1. Re:AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fast running.

      Sprint.

      Fucking idiot.

    2. Re:AT&T by errxn · · Score: 1

      Well, no, I wasn't talking about AT&T, but it just goes to illustrate the point that pretty much all of the cell services out there suck horribly, at least when it comes to anything beside collecting your money. Somehow, they're incredibly helpful and efficient at that.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    3. Re:AT&T by hackman · · Score: 1

      So I'm an idiot because I don't know the latest slogan for Sprint wireless? I'd prefer to stay an idiot, thanks. I just don't watch TV (cause most of it sucks and I don't have a TiVO yet).

      So sprint sucks too huh? Are there any cell phone companies that aren't money grubbing bastards?

      --
      __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    4. Re:AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir:

      No. That is not why you are an idiot.

    5. Re:AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, no, I wasn't talking about AT&T...
      Oh, for Christ's sake, you pretentious little twat: You just had to try and be cute, instead of simply writing like a normal person. "I can't say the name of the company, because it's such a big, mysterious secret." Fuck you, douchebag.
    6. Re:AT&T by errxn · · Score: 1

      That's great, thanks. Now, get back upstairs, mommy's calling you for dinner.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    7. Re:AT&T by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      Quote: "Oh, for Christ's sake, you pretentious little twat: You just had to try and be cute, instead of simply writing like a normal person. "I can't say the name of the company, because it's such a big, mysterious secret." Fuck you, douchebag."

      You see, if Slashdot used the speech analysis system described in this topic. You would instantly be modded up +5 Insigitful!

      Fuck you very much!

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
  140. Warning to faux Tourrettes sufferers... by mahler3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Keep in mind that if calls are recorded "for quality assurance purposes," it's possible that some unscrupulous employees might have access to those recordings. I forsee a web site or two devoted to funny recordings of people having irate "conversations" with automated call centers. So if you're tempted to try beating this system, at least make sure CallerID is blocked first. :-)

    1. Re:Warning to faux Tourrettes sufferers... by Valegor · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that if calls are recorded "for quality assurance purposes," it's possible that some unscrupulous employees might have access to those recordings. I forsee a web site or two devoted to funny recordings of people having irate "conversations" with automated call centers.

      Where I work every call is recorded including ones made to other employees in the building. We have not set up a webpage, but there have been audio cds made on occation. In fact I have one full of nothing but "Deez Nuts" jokes.

  141. The right department? hah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah, except getting to the right department usually takes minutes.
    Every .. is a second pause.

    "Please enter your account number, followed by the pound key."

    (presses numbers, then pound)

    "You pressed.. 2.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 6.. 7.. 8.. 9.. 2.. if this is correct press Pound."

    (presses pound)

    Thank you. "For workorder status press 1.. For customer care issues press 2.. to pay a balance, press 3.. to order new service, press 4.. for billing questions press 5.."

    (presses 5)

    "..Please hold while we transfer you to customer care.."

    It's just faster to hit 0, tell the customer rep your account number and get it taken care of.
    It's better than wasting 5-20 minutes going through the "speaking for EFL" auto-drone voice, only to be put on hold for another 5-10 minutes waiting for the Help desk person. And they usually don't send you "to the right department." The damned phone system doesn't even report the billing number you painstakingly entered to the tech support person! They always ask for it again.

    1. Re:The right department? hah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i.The damned phone system doesn't even report the billing number you painstakingly entered to the tech support person! They always ask for it again. /i.

      yeah- I never understood that- why have thesystem ask for the number if it never uses it and never passes it on to the human?

  142. This has worked at Sprint for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *2, customer care--say F-ck repeatedly and you get to an attendant instantly, otherwise you're in voice hell. Has been that way for a while... a sprint rant about swearing at Claire

  143. Maybe we should create some more jobs.... by goodrichgs · · Score: 1

    and just have a real person answer the phone in the first place? Most people despise these automated systems, and therefore they do nothing more than escalate the situation. What ever happened to the days when you made a call and got to talk to an actual person? Maybe rather than spending a bunch of time and money developing silly technologies such as this, the time and money should be spent on hiring someone to answer the phone!!!

  144. NEWS FLASH! by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



    Squeaky wheel gets grease. Film at 11.

    Sheesh.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  145. This is why I *like* outsourcing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I call tech support that sounds like it's been outsourced (and I can often follow up and find out if my instincts are right) I am treated a lot better than the jerk out of school who thinks he knows everything about everything.

    Maybe people wouldn't be so frustrated when they have to call support, if they knew that they wouldn't get some inconsiderate, smartassed, incompetent twit on the other end.

  146. I agree by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I wondered the same thing.

    When I worked in a record retail store, we had a policy posted above the cashier that all sales were final. Well, the thing was, if a customer came in and got mad at the counter and wouldn't leave, the manager would refund their money to get them to go out.

    I always felt this was shitty - aggressive, loud, selfish people got their money back while polite, friendly, non-confrontiational people didn't. I always thought everyone should be treated the same.

    On the other hand, if we wanted to reward some people and not others, why then I felt it should be the other way around - tell the assholes to get lost - call security if necessary - and give money back to people who were polite and nice about it. Geez, it might even begin to instill some politeness in some people.

    Then again, I've benefitted from this. At a local art store, they have a policy to give discounts to students. One day, the cashier asked someone in front of me if they were a student, when it came to my turn, I wasn't asked and forgot to provide my student card. When I remembered, just after having paid, the cashier refused. When I asked her to phone the manager, she did so and then turned to me with a very smug look and said she couldn't do it. I left, but was so angry (at her smugness at this point), I went back in and demanded to have the manager to tell me to my face that I didn't deserve the discount. This time I got it.

    I guess it is just a case of "the squeaky wheel gets the oil". It is probably not good to encourage this, though.

    1. Re:I agree by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Here at Slashdot, we use a special kind of evidence, called "anecdotal evidence". It's like normal evidence, but better!

      I guess it is just a case of "the squeaky wheel gets the oil". It is probably not good to encourage this, though.

      In my experience, the squeaky wheel gets replaced! ;)

    2. Re:I agree by coronaride · · Score: 1

      this is the product of modern capitalism..do whatever it takes to get customers..dont give a rat's ass about good customers unless they start to complain, and in that case - do whatever they want!

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, go into business for themselves.
    3. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the sweet world of tech support.

  147. Outsource it? by djeaux · · Score: 1
    "We are not just interested in what is being said, but how it is being conveyed," said program creator Shrikanth Narayanan, professor in the Speech Analysis and Interpretation Laboratory at the University of Southern California.

    Jeez! Have they outsourced the Speech & Interpretation Lab to India?

    Semi-seriously, I had an episode with an outsourced customer service line where the "tech" on the other end of the line simply didn't recognize English cusswords when he heard 'em. So maybe "machine intelligence" would be an improvement.

    "I'm velly solly, suh, but da louter don't have a fscking light. It have a ambah light."

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  148. Fucking board meetings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well fucking shit and spank me wildly with a monkey. I damn near couldn't ever get any fucking god damn tech fucking support fucking before I fucking like hell will now. I fucking wonder if this fucking shit will fucking work during those damn fucking long as shit jackass board shithead meetings.

  149. Tactics by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    My procedure:

    If it's a voice jail, I try to find the "if you know your party's extension..." part, and then hit 1234 or something. If that doesn't work I try another number. Once I get through to a random, real person, I then act as if I've got the wrong number and "would you please transfer me to the right department". Old social engineering tricks always work. Often times I end up with the supervisor of the support department I want to deal with, which is usually quite illuminating.

    If it's one of those idiotic "language detection" menus (where they waste an hour telling you "If you want technical support, say "technical support") I scratch on the receiver microphone for about 20 seconds until the thing gives up and hands me to a real person. Then I try the above technique.

    Most voice jails try very hard to keep you away from a real person (that's why we call 'em jails after all.) But with a little ingenuity you can bust through the bars every time.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  150. Outsourcing issue by br3itain · · Score: 1

    Given that the vast majority of customer support calls are outsourced to other countries, does this mean that we have to learn how to swear in Hindi or Pakistani?

  151. Rewarding incivility by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

    Swell. Great. Now we can all learn to curse like sailors on shore leave whenever we're on an automatic answering system. Apparantly the rude customers are more important than the polite ones. Let's reward incivility, shall we?

  152. Poor buggers. by Kwil · · Score: 2, Funny

    As if live support wasn't already rare enough.

    Who's going to want to work as a customer support rep after this?

    SUPPORT: Hello, you've reached XYZ, how can I help you?

    CUSTOMER: FUCK OFF AND DIE YOU STUPID CUNT! EAT MY SHIT!

    SUPPORT: Excuse me?!

    CUSOMTER: What? Oh.. oh geeze, sorry.. I thought you were a machine.

    --

    That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

  153. Re:Reporting Dead Birds to the State Health Depart by Politburo · · Score: 1

    So maybe West Nile Virus will break out in my area, and I will be able to go to DC with the names of the individuals who couldn't be bothered to take reports of dead birds...

    This is totally unfair. As you explained, they do not have the funds to take reports of dead birds. You make it sound like it is the staffer's job to take the report, when in fact it is not. Staffers in government rarely get straightforward reasoning for what they are doing, which is why the staffer simply told you that they do not take reports.

    *why* they don't take reports (legislature pulled their funding.)

    Those are the names you can go to DC with: the names of your elected officials.

  154. Has to be posted... by kinnell · · Score: 1

    This system will appreciated by certain people from Glasgow

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  155. Does it work with Indians too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should I start cussing out those Indian tech support people who are always maddeningly polite while offering no real support?

    Don't bother answering; I already do it and it doesn't work =(

  156. Wouldn't I love to be... by Belsical · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...the operator who those calls are transfered to.

    This brings an interesting concept of "matching" callers and operators. If you match the more impatient callers with operators who are able to handle those situations well and not get flustered, I'd imagine there would be less turnover. In addition, these positions could pay higher.

    Tiering customer support skill would definitely be more efficient and benefit both company and customer, in my opinion.

    --Ben

    --

    "There are no such things as mutual fantasies. Yours bore us and ours offend you."
    - Bill Maher
  157. no thanks. by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to have a very lengthy voicemail message (about 2 minutes and 50 seconds). It explained, in detail, every single last question someone could want answered. If they did have some other question it was likely that they didn't belong calling my department or they were confused but there was still an option to leave a voicemail and I would return the call... Using this method I had limited myself to 5 or less voicemails a day since July 2003 (I would receive anywhere between 80 and 100 calls a day)...

    Now. Just last week I had to remove this message and shorten it to under a minute because some asshole complained that he did not want to wait that long for the message (and he wasn't bright enough to try * or # which nearly all voicemail systems respond to to skip the message). I was first asked to put the disclaimer that you can skip the message w/the * key... Whoever thought that up was a moron. You NEVER tell someone how to skip it or the point of the voicemail message is moot.

    Phone trees are apparently never checked thoroughly. They need to be tested 100s of times by different people to make sure that no matter what a call is routed to the right place. My voicemail message was corrected 5 or 6 times to make sure that it was working 100% and that no questions would be left unanswered.

    Amazingly enough no one was happy except me.

    Sad world we live in.

  158. I'd hate to be working tech support by Tetrad_of_doom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not that a tech support job is any good to begin with, but it sounds like this system will gaurantee that the ONLY people you speak with are really pissed-off.

  159. Being Polite to Angry People by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I was doing tech support, I was told that whenever a customer swore at me, I was to reply, "Sir (or Ma'am), please call back when you can control your language," and hang up. Boy, angry people get REALLY mad when you call them "Sir (or Ma'am)"!

    --
    On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
  160. Humor by jvance · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, why limit yourself to the "humorous" aspects of Tourette Syndrome (note the lack of possessive, you dyslexic fuckwit.)

    Scenario - person different from self calls helpdesk. Hijinks ensue:

    Cerebral Palsy: "MMMmmuuughghg ghghghanllggh"

    Black: "Now whea dat button fo' watermelon 'n' chitlins?"

    Slashdot dork (nasally voice caused by the crushing weight of coke-bottle glasses): "I've certainly learned that you're a whiny cunt."

    Oh yes. This is such highbrow humor. ANYONE who is offended MUST be humor impaired.

    http://www.tsa-usa.org/about_tsa/images/notfunny .h tm

    1. Re:Humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone isn't offened by a joke, it probably isn't that funny.

    2. Re:Humor by jvance · · Score: 1
      If someone isn't offened by a joke, it probably isn't that funny.

      "For my birthday I got a humidifier and a de-humidifier... I put them in the same room and let them fight it out. Then I filled my humidifier with wax, and now my room is all shiny."

      Yeah, you're right. None of Steven Wright's schtick is the least bit funny.

      ...and always remember the last words of my grandfather, who said "A truck!" -- Emo Philips

    3. Re:Humor by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      Who said it was highbrow? We all know these aren't the jokes you tell to your company's CEO. For instance, it would be entirely inappropriate to tell him how much dyslexics hate Fuddrucker's restaurant.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  161. Billions of bilious blue blistering barnacles by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just go into Captain Haddock mode.
    Try, oh say
    "You odd-toed ungulates and two-timing tartar twisters, you coelacanths! I have no touch tone phone you vegetarian macrocephalic baboons! You Bashi-Bazouks! tell the dictatorial duck billed diplodocus that employs you that ten thousand terrifying turtles could not keep me as your customer."

    Or something like that.

  162. Re: Swearing at a machine... by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In most cases, I would agree that jerks should not be rewarded for their jerky behavior, heck, when someone beeps at me at a light that just turned green, I stop and count to three to piss them off if I saw they light change and think they are being too hasty with the horn.

    However, I don't see that swearing at an automated answering program makes you a jerk. I swear at my computer all the time. If companies want to give obnoxiously irate people preferential treatment, then those people will be their customers, while the docile masses migrate to where they can stand in a queue without 'cutters' being allowed.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  163. A really clever application by Myco · · Score: 1

    I've seen several suggestions along the lines of "route the moderately angry callers to immediate support, but disconnect the super-angry ones and tell them to call back when they've calmed down," or the like. Here's my idea for what to do with the super-angry ones who are cursing up a storm: have a Real Person pick up the line right when they're in the middle of a stream of profanity. The Real Person can act all offended and get rid of the person without any damage to the company's image -- nobody's obliged to stay on the line with a prank caller, after all.

  164. Re:Reporting Dead Birds to the State Health Depart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What state are we talking about here? If it's one that's close to the Canadian border I might be interested in writing this up as a story. I can be reached at rross AT thestar DOT com.

  165. Again, and this time with feeling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just cursing won't do you any good. According to the article:

    >Narayanan's program parses speech by transforming it into electrical waveforms. "If you plot these waveforms given off by speech -- those wiggly things -- a high energy will give a greater amplitude, which affects the way the waves come out," Narayanan said.

    >The angrier the caller becomes, the greater the energy that will be apparent in the wave pattern. Once the wave pattern hits the level the computer is programmed to recognize as the frustration cutoff point, the caller will immediately be transferred to the operator.

    So, just saying fuck 4325 times won't get you anywhere, but screaming your head off might.

  166. Just what we need... by iCoach · · Score: 1

    ... somethin else to make fscking sweawing more fscking prevelante.

    Fsck spell chack and preview.

    -Coach

    --
    "Never upset a goalie, getting hit with a blocker is an unpleasent experience - facemask or not." -Me
  167. what would be really nice... by calethix · · Score: 1

    An automated system that doesn't make me enter my phone number, just to forward me to an actual person who asks me for my phone number again and then forward me to a different person who asks me my phone number yet again before I actually get any help.

  168. Anger-Powered Cars... by revjd909 · · Score: 1

    Just have to share this hilarious article, which kind of fits the theme:

    CLICK HERE TO READ

    "I was getting 107 miles to the gallon when I T-boned that bus."

    --
    *** once i really listened, the noise just went away. -liz phair
  169. FESS UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I finally bellowed "HUMAN!!!!!" as loud as I could into the receiver.

    This is /. You can tell us the truth. You know you yelled only because you're an Angry Mick . . . ; )

    1. Re:FESS UP! by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      Hee Hee. With service like this, surely you can see how I became The Angry Mick . . .

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  170. DirecTV experience by fname · · Score: 1

    I think DirecTV is great, but my experience yesterday was awful. Let me give the rundown.

    1) Get my DirecTV bill, and I'm not credited with $10 as I should have been.

    2) Call DirecTV. On 1st menu, select choice for existing customer.

    3) Enter my phone number (so they can figure out my account). Read my phone number back to me-- y'know, 'cause I always mistype it. Press "1" to continue.

    4) Enter my account number-- what? So they can confirm my account.

    5) They read my street address. Press "1" to confirm. So I've now given them a unique identifier, and confirmed that I entered it correctly 3 times!!!

    6) Long-winded spiel about checking my balance. Gimme a friggin' break. How many people call up DirecTV to check their account balance. 1 out of 1000? Finally select choice for other option.'

    7) Next menu has no option that apply. Press "0" to talk to real person.

    8) Wait on hold 5-10 minutes with no estimate of wait time.

    9) Person with difficult to understand Indian accent picks up the phone. Asks for my phone number. Twice. (I've now confirmed my unique identifier 5 times).

    10) Asks for my name to verify the acocunt (6 times confirming ID)

    11) Explain the problem. Claims his system is down and I have to wait 2-3 minutes. Finally credits my account.

    Total time, about 20 minutes. I honestly think DirecTV does this on purpose, along with many other companies. I can't remember the last time I was underbilled, but I've been overbilled by DirecTV, Verizon, Verizon Wireless, Covad, Earthlink and Adelphia probably close to 20 times in the lst 2.5 years. They know it's a PITA to resolve these things, so they hope we'll eventually give up.

    Next time I call DirecTV, I'm pretending I'm a new customer.

    1. Re:DirecTV experience by mabu · · Score: 1

      You were obviously too nice. If you let them know how frustrated you are, they'll credit your account $20.00.

  171. When will people like you understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Will the general population continue to value "cheap" and "more" above all else? "

    The cost of production is not related to the cost of the item, nor does it ensure any special level of support.

    Take a look at Microsoft. You pay $300 for XP Pro, and do you realize you get almost no support? Further, what you pay for Windows XP is not at all related to the cost of development or production of XP; its simply an number that MS came up with that is designed to maximize revenue?

    Lets use a slightly less unique example.... Cellular Phone Service. The cost you pay for access to the network is related to what the market will bear; the $40-70 you pay doesn't pay for network access its simply the number the cell phone company judges you'll pay.

    Whether or not you get good support is related to how much money the company is willing to spend on customer support. But don't be silly and start thinking that if we paid more for our products we'd get better support.

  172. Comcast's phone system by shane_rimmer · · Score: 2, Funny

    This will only work well for Comcast if it detects swearing after the call is terminated:

    Auto System: Attempting to connect your call.
    Auto System: Please wait.
    Auto System: Please wait.
    Auto System: Please wait.
    Auto System: All operators are currently busy. Please call back. Good bye.

    FUCK!

  173. Yay! by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back when I was working phone support, I used to delight in telling those assholes that they needed to format their hard drives. A system like this would have greatly improved my job satisfaction and performance numbers, since every call would have been an FFR (Fdisk-Format-Reinstall.) Not gonna bust my ass if the customer's a dick...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  174. show no mercy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meh when my customers (tech support) start getting swear-riffic with me i offer to transfer them to the dialtone que

  175. Treating the symptom, not the disease by Dracos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shouldn't the need for this tell companies that real people want to talk other real people when they use the phone?

  176. Please say "ass" or "hole"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When our automated phone directory service looks up a number, it automatically offers to connect you, saying "Please say 'yes' or 'no'". "Ass" and "hole" work just as well, tho, and provide a certain amount of satisfaction....

  177. Obligitory Simpsons Quote by Inuchance · · Score: 1

    Oh, a sarcasm detector. That's a REAL useful invention!

  178. Our non-confrontation society by mabu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One problem is that people are becoming more passive-aggressive and non-confrontational. Part of the whole corporate customer-support business model is based around making it as inconvenient as possible to seek help. Gone are the days when a support 800 number was available, much less obvious.

    Admittedly, people are getting dumber and have shorter attention spans than ever, and the new customer support business model exploits that by making it very difficult to get help. Customers are treated with apathy and disrespect from the moment they make contact nowadays.

    The only way to fight back is to FIGHT BACK.

    I hate to say it, but every time I've not censored my opinion on an issue, I get things resolved.

    Here are some suggestions:

    1. Always ask for the person's name you're speaking with - immediately. This puts them on the defensive and makes them behave a little better.

    2. In most cases, you should NEVER deal with tier-one support. Immediately ask to be "escalated" - the first tiers are morons whose main job is to make you feel guilty you called in the first place and get you off the line ASAP.

    3. Still having problems? Contact the PRESIDENT of the company or the highest accessible executive. You will be AMAZED how quickly you can get a problem resolved. A friend of mine had a billing problem with a local ISP/telco. He sat outside the president's office -- until he came out and was forced to field my friend's issue. The President assigned a special assistant to my friend to deal with the problem and made it go away fast. I'm sure the President said to his assistant, "Do whatever you have to do, but I don't want to see these people again." - and it worked!

    I also like to remind them that hell hath no fury like a pissed off customer, that you'll write letters, put up a web page, or other things. In the past, I got a $17,000 settlement against a company after I put up a web page addressing the problems I had. While some companies don't give a damn, others do, and in several circumstances I've made it clear that if they don't resolve my problem, I'll shout about it from the rooftops and it'll cost them a thousand times my loss in bad PR for them.

    Speaking of problems, I recently got ripped off from a company called Big Impressions out of Arkansas. I highly recommend you avoid these sleazebags.

    1. Re:Our non-confrontation society by scrytch · · Score: 1

      Still having problems? Contact the PRESIDENT of the company or the highest accessible executive.

      I'm currently having problems with Outlook. Still think that'll work?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    2. Re:Our non-confrontation society by mabu · · Score: 1

      I'm currently having problems with Outlook. Still think that'll work?

      Well, you have a bigger problem is you're still using Outlook. Nobody can help you there. Have you tried praying?

  179. The Nanny Phone System` by thelizman · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Hi, Dell Tech Support? Yeah, I work at the Hoover Dam"

    <BLEEEP> 'Transferring now'

  180. Does it work for good /. mods? by why+cant+i+get+the+n · · Score: 0

    I *FUCKING* wonder if this will give me a *GODDAMNED* good mod. HM I hope *SHIT* this works -FSCKing FUCKTARD ASSHOLE

  181. but still... by patrick.whitlock · · Score: 1

    its too bad that i don't know what language to swear in to get my appropriate help tho...

  182. heheeheh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, that was funnier than the parent!!

  183. maybe i'm missing something... by scottking · · Score: 2, Insightful
    okay, so you install this ager recognition system, and people start getting sent to a live rep more, instead of getting pissed off and hanging up. perfect, now your customer support center is handling things better by giving it that personal touch.

    customers start using the anger detection to get a rep because no one really likes talking to a machine, i can relate. so now, in an effort to keep your service on track, you add a few more people to handle the increased call volume because more people are getting to talk with a person... fair enough.

    so, my question is, why not hire more support staff and simplify your menu options to "for sales and billing press 1, for all other requests press 2"? i mean you're going to be pushing more calls to staff anyway, why not get more staff and give the customer what they want?

    --
    scott king
  184. Wouldn't want to work for that company by JonnyO · · Score: 1

    As if being a call center employee wasn't bad enough, now you are guaranteed that EVERY person you talk to will be completely pissed off. Sign me up.

  185. Re:Reporting Dead Birds to the State Health Depart by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > This is totally unfair. As you explained, they do not have the funds to take reports of dead birds.

    Wow, they cannot afford a pen or two and a single sheet of paper per 20 (or so) calls? Talk about underfunded. OR, just maybe, they are too fucking lazy to do any work -- they are government workers -- and blame it on whatever is handy.

  186. Obligatory Simpsons quote: by dancingmad · · Score: 1

    "It'll be like the Swiss Family Robinson, only with more cursing! We'll live like kings! Damn hell ass kings!"

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  187. Re:solving the wrong problem by demonlapin · · Score: 1
    You have broached the wrong idea for this place. Don't you know that everyone has a right to totally free L3 support to everything without ever actually identifying themselves, even if the company is picking up the tab for the call?

    Actually, you could have a nice little web support system that let you take a test and get an access code that starts you out with a certain PPQ - say, you go straight to L2 support - and then you upgraded/downgraded as appropriate.

  188. Tourette's Syndrome Barbie by lildogie · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Socialization is f***ing hard. Let's go f***ing shopping."

  189. No surprise by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that the companies with the absolute worst telephone support are telecommunication companies?

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:No surprise by hackman · · Score: 1

      Yes, it seems to be consistently true. They must understand that fewer customers that reach the live support personnel the better. They are also the ones that disable the "0" when you're in their system.

      --
      __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
  190. The no hassle way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use the Howard Dean ROAR over and over !!!

  191. Reasons why you're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, exactly what does the word "sprint" mean on your planet, sunshine?

  192. People unclear on the concept. by blair1q · · Score: 1
    if ( caller_is_talking_to_recording() )
    {
    bring_human_customer_servant_online();
    }

    // problem solved
  193. Go to USC and reinvent Customer Service by tyrione · · Score: 1

    This is an absolute waste of resources. First let's automate call traffic and deter individuals from calling--we'll call spin it as a system answering frequently asked questions. Then after a decade of drilling this abstraction down to the point it takes five minutes just to reach your desire--live customer support--one now discover's their threshold of tolerance.

    Unfortunately, this is the wrong time to discover such depths. The result soon becomes a common behavior now legally accountable--verbal assault.

    What a complete misuse of technology, but have no fear, we will invest in time and research to determine the threshold (stress/strain failure graph) of when enough is enough and return you to an actual human being. We cannot guarantee on the level of competency this individual possesses in answering your concerns, but at least it's no longer a machine, right? Sure, we could invest in customer training and give these poor saps more technical skills but that has been determined to cost less, short-term, that this new wonderful technology.

    How about the kind professor applies his experience to actually working with improving telecommunication devices or wireless signal capturing devices?

    The reason people are pissed off is they had to wait five minutes just to hear an idiot recite from a canned script and since they now feel used like an old tampon they want to flush the frustration on the nearest recipient--customer support rep. john/jane doe.

  194. The result of this and offshore outsourcing by killmeplease · · Score: 1

    The result of the anger switchbox:

    This system is like trading fresh fruit for rotting vegetables. Instead of letting everyone get the same treatement, unhappy callers are going to get preferencial treatment, allowing tech support to receive only unhappy calls when their is a significant call volume. Everyone else will have to wait until they are irate. I think this is just what you do not want as a business owner, make everyone unhappy instead of dealing with things as they are.

    The result of off-shore outsourcing of tech support:

    Indian tech support can be so annoying that I have wanted to jump into my phone and wring the neck of the tech worker helping me out with my support problems. It is frustrating, I had a pretty complicated hardware / Windows XP conflict with a new PC and called Compaq tech support only to get a very Indian programmer that talked with a heavy accent, such that I could not understand him and he could barely understand me. I picked his brain for 30-45 minutes before I wanted to kill him and asked for his supervisor, only to get an Indian woman who couldn't understand a word I was saying, let alone my support issue or issue with the other caller, and I have a regular Southern California accent and we both spoke English. Needless to say I think that off-shore outsourcing of tech support is a bad idea when you are a) selling expensive and complicated products b) want to get repeat customers c) care about the quality of service your existing customers will receive. Needless to say I will never buy a Compaq / HP computer, recommend my company buy a HP product / Server/ et ..., and I will discourage any friend that calls about a potential computer purchase from ever getting an HP product.

    Conclusion:

    It is already frustrating enough when you go through the voice menu system for a company and key in your card number / account number, confirm oyu are the account holder and provide vital information. Then when you wait on hold for 5 minutes you get an Indian tech support that asks for your account information and how you can solve your problem and have to figure out how to communicate your problem. The whole idea of tech support as an expensive annoyance to companies with billions in revenue & executives riding around in private jets and they cannot afford to keep their customers happy with support is just baffling.

    --
    - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
  195. Companies need to learn by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    that customers have a right to be pissed off.

    I don't see why companies think that they can fuck up and then expect the customer they fucked over to kiss their ass in order to get the company to take responsibility.

    If a customer is pissed off, deal with it. I had angry people call tech support and instead of being an asshole I addressed their problem and *shock of shocks* they got nice.

    "Geez, it might even begin to instill some politeness in some people."

    People tend to be polite until you piss them off. Then they have every right to display their disgust with you. If you don't like it, don't piss them off. It's not very hard to quote company policy (which you should know) in order to convince people you can't help them with their particular problem. The problem with many employees who piss people off is that they don't know they policies and so the pissed off customer has no reason to believe that the employee isn't just being an ass who refuses to do something the customer is fully aware they are capable of doing and are required to do by store policy.

    Forcing companies to deal with pissed off customers might instill some sense in the company to hire people who can actually do their job and uphold promises and other nutty things.

    Dotster's automated system decided to throw a canned answer to my billing question which didn't even remotely address the question and then they claimed the issue was resolved. I sent them a very strongly worded e-mail telling them the problem was not resolved, that I was not legally responsible to pay the amount because the Capital One employee was an idiot and didn't cancel the card when I told her to (for all legal purposes the card was canceled) and told them to cancel the charge and that I was going to pay the amount on another card.

    Instead of being idiots and whining about me not sending them flowers they did what I told them to do and they maintain free advertising on my site (something another registrar requested and I refused) and even though I could pay less, I'm sticking with Dotster. Simply because they dealt intelligently with my situation.

    They understood I had a right to be annoyed, wasn't requesting anything absurd and simply did what I asked.

    More companies need to figure that out. Companies that fuck up and try to make me kiss their ass permanently lose a customer for life. And I activly tell people not to use their services.

    Ben

    1. Re:Companies need to learn by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are the pinnacle of customer service.

    2. Re:Companies need to learn by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Dude, that post was good enough to land you on my Friends list. :)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  196. /. affect anyone... by linuxdawg · · Score: 0

    ok lets all call sco & SCREEM TO GET AN OPERA.... wait this is still in devlopment.....SHIT DAMN I HATE YOU DARL!!!!!!!

    --
    Cool Linux
    A Linux News Site
  197. Please give to Dell! by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Dell has the worst phone system I've ever been cursed to use. To simply order a new battery for a laptop involved about 7 transfers and was just a complete pain in the ass. I try to avoid doing business with them, both their phone and web systems suck. Too much extraneous information, having to enter your machine serial just to download a driver. Sure, that's nice if you are inexperienced. But having to run back and look at a server just to get a driver for a NIC that you already know the model number of and intended platform is just an unneeded pain in the ass.

  198. New Technology Solution: by thung226 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be cheaper just to use real people?

    --
    -n-
  199. The inventor of this system.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..clearly has no idea how the business world works. There is no way in hell this technology will be implemented widely.

    Why? Because it is a deliberate policy of companies to annoy you, it helps them get what they want. Want to open a new account, it will take 3 minutes max. Want to close an account? Prepare to wait half an hour and be transferred through 3 different departments. The whole idea is to make you annoyed so much that you give up.

    This game is played in different ways by 90% of the service companies out there, most of these companies survive on the margin created by this bullying tactic. Why the hell would they want to make customers lives easier?

    I'm not kidding.

  200. Re:Obviously, society is crumbling. by jjjack · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That sounds pretty misinformed. Have you ever filled out a financial aid application? The most important part of it is your family income, not your savings. Though if you have a great deal of assets saved for college they will expect you to use them, the actual EFC (expected family contribution) is calculated mostly from your adjusted gross income on your tax return. So what that has to do with a consumer culture, I have no idea.

  201. Conversation with president of Samsung USA. by SacredNaCl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wanted to return a lot of PCS phones that were bad (no analog). I worked for an IV pharmacy that delivered to peoples homes, many of them in very rural areas of Missouri, Illinois & Iowa. So having analog work on all of our phones was extremely important to us.

    I had already delt with Sprints runaround (No, I do NOT have 3 frickin' weeks to get my phones replaced!) so I decided to call Samsung. No matter what option I pressed I could not get to a real live person. In disgust, I eventually gave up after an hour solid of messing with it. The next morning I called investor relations (which had already closed when I made my earlier call) and asked to speak to the president. Lo and behold, a half hour later he did call me back.

    "You do know that no matter what option you press you can't get to a real live person?" CEO: "No, there should be an option..." Me:"Let's try it!" I punched another line, dialed the number and let him have at it. He couldn't get to a real live person either. You could hear him suppressing his desire to cuss. He appologized & then said "I've never had to use the phone system, when I want to get ahold of someone I have my assistant place the call and connect me when they get through..." Must be nice.

    After explaining what our business did -- I had my half dozen crates of replacement phones in less than 6 hours from the time that call ended and they were already activated for me. All of them worked flawlessly as well.

    If you can't get to billing, try investor relations for getting a real live person.

    --
    Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  202. Beta program by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2, Funny

    With initial tryouts scheduled to take place at Parris Island, SC., right?

  203. so in essence you can be replaced by a voicemail by waspleg · · Score: 1

    "what exactly is it that you DO here" -- the bobs

    sounds like job security to me

    i hope your boss doesn't read /.

  204. analysis point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Business pov: Adequately handled calls unchanged, inadequately handled calls improved.

    2. Psychological pov: Natural inborn get attention mechanism is handled by satisfying its needs - its given attention.

    3. Ivory tower/Slashdot pov: Squeeeky wheel gets greased, and us long quiet suffering types gets nada.

  205. prof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my profs, Eric Fosler Lussier, worked on this kind of research while he was at Bell labs. The objective of the research is not to screw people over with automated phone systems, but rather to help the automated phone system do a better job. Usually when people talk to automated systems, they act in a fairly calm manner. If a person starts to get angry, there is a high probability that the automated system is repeatedly misinterpretting what they are saying. In this case, it is handy to be able to detect this anger and back off from certain conclusions the system may have drawn. If things get really bad, it may decide it is lost and transfer you.

  206. CSR support by bluetrident · · Score: 1

    I work at a small company which offers a customer support line. Our president has recently suggested recording an extension that, when a customer begins to use profanity/abusive language, states that, 'Here at XYZ company, we do not appreciate such language. Please respect our Customer Service Representatives and use appropriate language. Thank you!" Then transfers them back to the call queue.

    We later decided that it would only infuriate the customer more, but what a great way to get to get a little revenge in the 'smile while speaking' world.

  207. Let me get this straight... by RedA$$edMonkey · · Score: 0

    So the idea is to make customers happy by getting them so pissed at the automated system that they actually start swearing at a lifeless machine and then and only then will they finally get to talk to a help desk that now only answers calls from people who are +/- a few degrees from snap-I've-gone-insane?

    I don't know if I feel more sorry for the customers or the people answering the phones.

  208. Secret of talking to a real live person. by comedian23 · · Score: 1

    I probably shouldn't be giving out my secret to getting past the endless menus since if we all start doing it, it may go away but here it is. Just press 0. That's it. Anytime you get a choice of anything like "Press 1 for automated balance, blah blah blah", just press 0 instead. They seem to leave this undocumented option open as a last resort. In my experience 9 times out of 10 you get directed to a real live person, and although it is usually a secretary you can get him/her to transfer you to whoever you want. Plus your service level may be upgraded because you are being transfered from an inside line instead of being "just another call from the pool". Works with banks, power companies, cable companies, you name it.

    And if 0 doesn't work then just start entering a bunch of crap. Usually if you cause an error, they will assume you are too dumb to use the automated system and give you a person. Example, "Please enter your social security number." So you type "7#887893274289*2173897###8712634". There you go. Please use sparingly. We want the 0 to be available for us and for our children.

    -Comedian

  209. Great idea to get hold of live help. by linkdead · · Score: 1

    Practice for next year's "talk like a pirate day"

    ARRR, we be geting tech suhPAAAAAAAAAAAARt matey. AHOY YE SCURVY DOGS!!!!!

  210. OT: Narayanan by crushinghellhammer · · Score: 1

    Shrikanth Narayanan was at Bell Labs too, for close to seven years I think. Perhaps they knew each other then.

    I graduated from USC last year and a took a couple of Narayanan's classes...very interesting...and the man's driven!

  211. "those wiggly things"? by unboring · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Narayanan's program parses speech by transforming it into electrical waveforms. "If you plot these waveforms given off by speech -- those wiggly things -- a high energy will give a greater amplitude, which affects the way the waves come out," Narayanan said.

    Do people reading Wired really need waveforms explained to them as "wiggly things"?? Are they really that dumb? :)

  212. what a good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except for the fact that in the long run, hiring more people to man the lines costs more.

  213. New source of IT jobs? by Arkaengel · · Score: 1

    All the justifiably frustrated and unemployed IT geeks left high and dry by outsourcing and the dotcom crash can now be re-integrated into productive society, putting their finely-honed profanity skills to good use as phone service facilitators. I see this as the start of a new golden age, personally.

  214. Ooooh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might like this system. If I'm fed up enough to call support, I usually get hold music and my blowing-off-steam reaction is always something like "Jesus Fucking Christ" (and being a pagan, it isn't blasphemy to me, just societally ingrained :). Maybe I'll start getting faster support.

    Not exactly a good way to encourage polite behavior, but I'll take it.

  215. Aaaargh! by Solokron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your wait time is.... thirty....five.... minutes...

    I hate this #$%* Service!!!

    Agressive Level detecting, confirmed, level 8. Initiating Kenny G's Greatest Hits, Loop = 2

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  216. F***in G**d*** motherfu**** by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    I am so going to rip you b**** off that your scank of a s*** girl is going to (bleeP) on her (bleep) and then (bleepin) (bleep) (bleepoid).

    Booga ya dooga mig na toot!

    Tech: "How may I help you?"
    Me: "Where's the ANY key?"
    Tech: (Booya dubba hooba eagh!) ....click....

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  217. Tourette Syndrome vs. Humor by zedmelon · · Score: 1
    Since this is clearly NOT funny, I know I'm not supposed to make observations like this, but...

    At the bottom of the image produced by following your (fixed) link, there is an address:

    42-40 Bell Boulevard

    Is there a Tourette joke in there as well?

    --
    Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
    1. Re:Tourette Syndrome vs. Humor by zedmelon · · Score: 1

      I also couldn't help but notice that even though the site seems to be devoted to dispelling the common misconception that the sole symptom of Tourette Syndrome is the uncontrollable shouting of randomly-placed profanity, the logo that the Tourette Syndrome Association has chosen for itself certainly looks to me like it could very well be representing a person shouting profanity.

      --
      Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
  218. Re: TSA Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re: TSA Link

    HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA..oh god..that is great..I just spewed sierra mist out my nose. I think I'll print this on a T-Shirt.

  219. Will anything changed? by DrSpirograph · · Score: 1

    So instead of:
    Computer: To ensure your call is answered as soon as possible, please enter your customer reference number.
    (enter number, then wait in queue for 10 minutes)
    Human: Hi welcome to blah. Before we get started can I get your customer reference number.

    you'll get

    Computer: To ensure your call is answered as soon as possible, please swear your head off.
    You: BLOODY MACHINES!
    (then wait in queue for 10 minutes)
    Human: Hi welcome to blah. Before we get started can I ask you how frustrated you're feeling?

  220. Just what we need... by phamNewan · · Score: 1

    I might just have to try this out.

    I know that starting off nuts, and then calming down has helped me deal with incorrect bills before, I figure that by the time I am reasonable again, they are just more willing to just give in to my demands.

    Hmmm, they might even be able to use such information to route the callers to particular employee's, i.e. Angry man gets routed to sexy southern drawl, man then calms down.

  221. Just for the record by rark · · Score: 1

    Cursing (there's a scientific word for this -- corpra-something, but I'm too lazy to go look it up) is actually only a tic in a significant minority of people with Tourettes syndrome. It usually manifests with both physical and verbal tics, but the verbal tics are 'bad words' in only about 40% of people with Tourettes.

    Actually, that's the official word. What I find, personally, is that about 90% of my verbal tics are *not* cursing -- I tend to announce that objects are blue and then order them to go home (note, I didn't say it made *sense*) or make strange noises (of which 'rark' is one), but every so often I get a several minute stream of 'fuck' or 'fuck you'.

    Go fig. Tourettes is strange, but the cursing is only a small part of it experienced by some but not the majority of people with tourettes.