Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Extension Lets You Pick the Name

Rovaedne writes "Mozilla Firefox , the web browser formerly known as Firebird, formerly known as Phoenix, has a new extension which allows you to change the name to something palatable. The extension called Firesomething lets users change the name seen in the browser titlebar, Help menu, and About dialog, thus erradicating all traces of "Firefox" in Firefox (currently version 0.8). There is a name change FAQ, but it currently does not mention this extension. This extension should hopefully help curb some of the criticism that Mozilla has received from its most recent choice of name."

479 comments

  1. Actually by PatrickThomson · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's primary function is to randomise the browser name to avoid name clashes. I'm currently browsing in mozilla firebunny, for example.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    1. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm browsing with Mozilla Moonraccoon and couldn't be happier.

    2. Re:Actually by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

      I think Mozilla Lightningmonkey is the best browser by far.

    3. Re:Actually by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Funny

      As other have hinted below, why not take this a step further?

      Bring out an extention for other apps.

      For instance, being able to change OpenOffice to Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel. That way you can fool the higher-up's into thinking you have "what everyone else is using".

      Save the cash from buying Office and take that money and go on a vacation! Then, when you get back, and before you get charged with fraud, quit and go live in a goat farm somewhere making cheeses.

      Ok, I got way off on a tangent there...but you see what I mean.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    4. Re:Actually by lemonjus · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Mine is "Mozilla Superfrog" !!

    5. Re:Actually by T_Tobagous · · Score: 0

      And I'm on Enlightenment Explorer. The brand new browser.

    6. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla Supertuna is way better.

    7. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla Firemonkey

    8. Re:Actually by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 4, Interesting

      would help those running pokerbots for the online poker sites... currently, the largest online poker site is blocking a bot program by not letting you log in (or kicking you off) by scanning for a window with the program name in the title. You can even go to the program's home page, and because the title bar switches, it will kill it.

      If I acutally wanted to USE this bot, it would be pretty trivial to hack it's resources to change the titlebar (actually, I'm sure the author has already randomized the title). We're going to see an increasing battle between 'bot programs for online gambling and those who run online gambling sites.

      If you're curious, to a google groups search on rec.gambling.poker for "WinHoldEm"

    9. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla Thunderfuck

      Eat shit and die.

    10. Re:Actually by Davak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Will Firefox ever fix the lack of DDE support?

      For example, I can communicate with mozilla with a command such as:

      Link.LinkTopic = "Mozilla|WWW_GetWindowInfo"
      Link.LinkMode = 2
      Link.LinkRequest

      I can grab all sort of nice information through this process. Netscape, Opera, IE -- all support this function. Firefox currenly does not.

      If plug-ins like the one described in the original posting change the DDE information, then it will even be more complicated to develop applications that are compatable with this browser.

      Davak

    11. Re:Actually by jelle · · Score: 1

      You're one of the early adopters I guess. Obviously, the extension is a result of great planning, because now they are in perfect shape for the next official name change, when they find a reason not to like firefox anymore...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    12. Re:Actually by jokercito · · Score: 1

      "but you see what I mean..."

      No...

    13. Re:Actually by bnenning · · Score: 1

      If I acutally wanted to USE this bot, it would be pretty trivial to hack it's resources to change the titlebar (actually, I'm sure the author has already randomized the title). We're going to see an increasing battle between 'bot programs for online gambling and those who run online gambling sites.

      Yeah. Fortunately from what I've heard winholdem isn't too good (although it's likely still better than the morons who think Q7 offsuit is worth calling a raise with). And it doesn't support the site I use, yet.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    14. Re:actually by Random+Guru+42 · · Score: 1

      Then did he raise on high the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch, saying, "Bless this, O Lord, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy." And the people did rejoice and did feast upon the lambs and toads and tree-sloths and fruit-bats and orangutans and breakfast cereals ... Now did the Lord say, "First thou pullest the Holy Pin. Then thou must count to three. Three shall be the number of the counting and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither shalt thou count two, excepting that thou then proceedeth to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the number of the counting, be reached, then lobbest thou the Holy Hand Grenade in the direction of thine foe, who, being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it."
      from The Book of Armaments, 4:16-20 (with a wee bit missing.)

      --
      Christopher S. 'coldacid' Charabaruk -- coldacid.net
    15. Re:Actually by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      I'm new at this but what I think you meant was:

      1. Download OpenOffice
      2. Change application name to Office XP
      3. ???
      4. Profit

    16. Re:Actually by glass_window · · Score: 1

      Wow, yea, and another point of interest: It will tell the web server the name that you've made up is the name of the browser you're running. No, I'm not running IE, I'm currently running Ack! Spacedragon. Should make for quite a few laughs for those web admins that actually pay attention to these statistics!

    17. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      would help those running pokerbots for the online poker sites... currently, the largest online poker site is blocking a bot program by not letting you log in (or kicking you off) by scanning for a window with the program name in the title. You can even go to the program's home page, and because the title bar switches, it will kill it.

      If I acutally wanted to USE this bot, it would be pretty trivial to hack it's resources to change the titlebar

      Hmm, maybe it's not a trivial fix, but wouldn't it help to instead make a web browser that doesn't have such a pathetic security model? I mean, it's none of that poker site's damned business what OTHER windows I have open on my machine, and it shouldn't be able to detect anything like that. (Even if they are both windows of the same web browser.) Maybe I misunderstand the situation, but it's really surprising to me that this is even possible in any web browser.

    18. Re:Actually by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      I think the design is to let you program starting hands/betting patterns into it. so it is "adjustable"

    19. Re:Actually by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm using Mozilla Internet Explorer

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    20. Re:Actually by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      I can grab all sort of nice information through [DDE]. Netscape, Opera, IE -- all support this function. Firefox currently does not.

      Well, about ten posts above you, we have a user explaining that online gambling sites write their software to close down any window with a titlebar string equal to the string of some well-known gambling 'bot, so that a user can't use the 'bot to do his gambling for him. Possibly this is done through DDE (or through direct calls to the Windows API).

      Automation, and the ability for one program to use another can provide a great deal of convenience, but it can also allow for a great deal of maliciousness.

      Microsoft products, indeed, are legendary for being extremely convenient to any number of malicious subornings. Microsoft products are also legendary for short-sighted fixes. A prime example is Microsoft Outlook: Outlook originally embedded a fully functional macro language, and processed HTML mail in such a way that attachments could be run automatically. This of course, made it easy to send a virus or trojan to even a savvy user, and have the virus be run automatically.

      Microsoft's "fix" was to disallow the saving of any attachment with certain names (e.g., *.exe) and to cripple the macro language such that even locally run -- and written -- macros would ask for user confirmation at least every ten minutes -- a user could not even allow a particular macro for any period longer than ten minutes. Furthermore, Outlook made it impossible for anyone not running an Exchange server to "sign" even locally run macros. The short-sighted macro "fix" could only be gotten around by running -- and relying on the safety of -- certain additional third party software.

      So while DDE can be awfully convenient, I in no way consider every application running on my computer to be equal; some applications are widely trusted, but most are expected to do what they are meant to do without ranging over all active processes with DDE requests.

      Ideally, one would balance safety with convenience by doing what Outlook failed to do: allow users to "sign" or "revoke" DDE permissions for individual programs, and at several levels of granularity (read, write, more specific functionality as exposed by specific apps, etc.), much like a Windows-based software firewall can allow only specific applications to attach to specific port numbers for specific protocols.

      But until such a "DDE Firewall" exists, I'm pretty happy that Firefox doesn't support DDE. Firefox (by necessity) is one of the most trusted applications running on my machine: it's allowed to make outbound connections to any IP address so long as those connections are to port 80. For that very reasons, I don't want other programs to be able to audit its activities, or, worse, remotely use Firefox to initiate connections.

      If you really need something that can be programmed to do what Firefox does, consider writing your own program. There are a number of libraries such as Apache Common's HttpClient (for Java) and WWW::Mechanize (for Perl) that make it easy to set up something like "remote-controlled" browser; WWW::Mechanize::shell will even record your (non-GUI) interaction with web sites and produce from that a working Perl program that automates that interaction. And of course you can write Firefox extensions for anything that must happen within Firefox. But DDE is a too general approach that does more to threaten security than add convenience.

    21. Re:Actually by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      How long of a name can it take? Could I run it named as Dead Sole Rock Cod Turbot Haddock White Baith the Plaices Fish Bream Mackerel Salmon Poached Salmon Poached Salmon In a White Wine Sauce Salmon Meuniere and Helen Shapiro Flambe'?

      (/code won't let me use é.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  2. Next step for microsoft by peterprior · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Get Firefox
    2. Change name to Internet Explorer
    3. apply IE theme
    4. Release as Internet explorer 7
    5. Profi... oh ..wait... ;)

    1. Re:Next step for microsoft by JohnHegarty · · Score: 3, Funny

      1. Get Firefox
      2. Change name to Internet Explorer
      3. apply IE theme
      4. Insert SCO copyright code
      5. Get sued
      6. Profit

    2. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, that is exactly what I did here in corperate..

      Attach the IE icon to it and voila... the users act as if there is no difference except it's massively faster, no popup's, no crashes, no freezes.

      It's funny, many people scream about the massive retraining required switching workers to Open Source... It's not real.

    3. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right......

      Of course using a frigging web browser is the perfect example of ease of use in OSS apps.

    4. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of the current application development is web-based. Scripting, forms, and the like. A web browser like Firefox can be a fine OSS example in tandem with these web apps.

    5. Re:Next step for microsoft by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

      Step 3.5: add millions of security holes.

    6. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It'd be easier to believe you worked in corporate if you could actually spell it.

    7. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In corporate america, profit becomes lawyers, and sued becomes you,

    8. Re:Next step for microsoft by AmitArora · · Score: 1

      Well as soon as you do that Microsoft would be on your six to release a patch for it coz it is now a *Microsoft* product :)

    9. Re:Next step for microsoft by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Attach the IE icon to it and voila... the users act as if there is no difference except it's massively faster, no popup's, no crashes, no freezes.I use Firefox 0.8 as my primary browser at work and Mozilla 1.5 as my primary browser at home. Firefox crashes on me about once a week. I have no problems with Mozilla 1.5.

    10. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      It'd be easier to believe you worked in corporate if you could actually spell it.

      Actually, it wouldn't.

    11. Re:Next step for microsoft by Felinoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      It'd be easier to believe you worked in corporate if you could actually spell it.
      No it isn't. A culture who's primary application of the dictionary is to missuse words.

      On that note: Notice how of all the intelectual fields the only ones that are anal about spelling are the technical fields?

      Oh sure good spelling is nessisary to be understood but the human brain is able to correct for minnor mistakes so it's hardly worth being anal over.
      Doctors prescriptions tend to be illegable.
      Scientists pay proof readers.
      For writers good spelling skills is a way to save money (As in NOT paying for a proof reader)

      So why are techs so anal about spelling?
      Maybe the human brain can read mispelled words but the computer can not. Even the slightest spelling error will screw things up badly.

      Corprate however only needs spelling so far as to be understood clearly. Byond that... proof readers.

      Actually there is ONE other industry where spelling analness is the norm...
      Proof readers. However for a proof reader being anal about spelling is a job skill.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    12. Re:Next step for microsoft by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It's funny, many people scream about the massive retraining required switching workers to Open Source... It's not real."

      just because linux is open source and people have problems with linux, does NOT mean that people have problems with all open source apps. theres plenty of open source apps for windows that are just as good, and easy as closed source ones.

    13. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you glad you're not a microsofty?
      (I'm almost ashamed to make some remark about the hardness of linux)

    14. Re:Next step for microsoft by praksys · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Mozilla crowd should take a page from Microsoft's book and rename it to "Web Browser (tm)".

    15. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A culture whose primary ...

    16. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do slashdotters always bashing linux? It is getting tiresome.

    17. Re:Next step for microsoft by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > Notice how of all the intelectual fields the only ones that are anal about spelling are the technical fields?

      Now.. am I just the exception to the rule or are you hearing a very loud but small minority...

    18. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny, many people scream about the massive retraining required switching workers to Open Source... It's not real.

      it is real for productivty apps, of which a browser is not one.

    19. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh~ya?
      I used to replace my Winblows XP IE with Avant Browser with the IE icon (for the IE zealots in my home).
      I never thought about doing so with Firebird.

    20. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I had the same program. I upgraded to Mozilla 1.6 and Firefox 0.8 (on the same machine) and not only FF crashed quite often, it always took Mozilla down with it.

      I have since removed 0.8 and upgraded Mozilla to 1.7Beta and am so much happier.

    21. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is there any retraining cost at all?

      My user base points at the monitor and says cpu.

    22. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      no difference except it's massively faster

      Unless you mean massively faster than Mozilla, you're making stuff up.

    23. Re:Next step for microsoft by AntiOrganic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, except on massively slow machines (<= 300 MHz), I've definitely found Firefox to be much snappier at page rendering than Internet Explorer. You might be having some trouble if you're using extensions that slow the browser to a crawl, like Tabbrowser Extensions, but I've found that a vanilla Firefox is much faster than IE, especially on faster machines, at rendering everything but heavy (1000+ row) dynamically-sized tables and shitty AOL Hometown pages with 300 animated GIFs running at once.

    24. Re:Next step for microsoft by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      Yes, but religious anti-OSS and anti-Linux zealots act as if *all* OSS apps are unusable, low quality and require massive retraining! That's the problem!

    25. Re:Next step for microsoft by mkoenecke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a nice theory, and it is true the human brain can adjust for misspellings, but spelling errors distract the reader from the message and make one look uneducated. Every time (and it is pretty dratted often) I read some idiot using "loose" for "lose" I immediately think just that: "Idiot." Almost certainly unfair, but it's still my reaction.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    26. Re:Next step for microsoft by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      > replace my Winblows XP IE with Avant Browser

      Avant browser *is* IE, in all the ways that matter. It's just a wrapper around the same engine. So if you're feeling really good about throwing out IE... you didn't.

      HTH, HAND.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    27. Re:Next step for microsoft by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 1

      It'd be easier to believe you worked in corporate if you could actually spell it.

      I believe he's in corporate because he can't spell it. Now if his admin had typed it...

    28. Re:Next step for microsoft by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > It's funny, many people scream about the massive retraining required
      > switching workers to Open Source... It's not real.

      It can be; it depends what apps you're switching. The browser interface of
      MSIE was mostly designed to mimick the one in Netscape (which was mostly made
      to mimick the one in Mosaic) exactly for this reason: to minimize the need
      for retraining. Consequently, with browsers it's largely a non-issue.

      Basic word-processing is similarly standardized, as long as you don't want to
      do anything very complex. Once you start wanting to fool around with columns
      and frames and other things not found on the toolbar there are more differences,
      however. With spreadsheets it's similar: if all you want to do is balance
      your checkbook, Excel and Calc and MS Works and Gnumeric and Foxpro and KSpread
      are all pretty much exactly the same, but when you start wanting to mess with
      more involved functions (conditionals, statistical functions, ...) and insert
      charts and graphs and things, you start seeing more noticeable UI differences.

      There are also differences in the browsers, as far as that goes, when you
      start messing around with poweruser features like capability policies and
      tabbed browsing. But for most end users the only really important features
      in the browser are hyperlinks, the address bar, and the back button, and
      those are quite well standardised across the major browsers (except for the
      text browsers (Lynx, W3, Links, w3m, ...), but end users don't use those).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    29. Re:Next step for microsoft by GoatEnigma · · Score: 1
      Funny... because religious OSS and Linux zealots act as if every piece of Microsoft software is unusable and low quality.

      Maybe there's actually a problem on both sides?

    30. Re:Next step for microsoft by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 1
      Not trademarkable. Anyway, a generic-sounding name isn't exactly going to draw in the punters.

      I think names are really a non-issue. Lots of people are used to using software called 'Quark' and 'Quicken'; adding 'Firefox' (and even 'GNU/Linux') to the mix isn't going to hurt anybody.

    31. Re:Next step for microsoft by ibbey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a nice theory, and it is true the human brain can adjust for misspellings, but spelling errors distract the reader from the message and make one look uneducated. Every time (and it is pretty dratted often) I read some idiot using "loose" for "lose" I immediately think just that: "Idiot." Almost certainly unfair, but it's still my reaction.

      No, it's anal morons like you who distract the reader, not the spelling. I honestly hadn't noticed the misspelling until you pointed it out (and I have better then average spelling abilities). What you need to remember is that most people posting to Slashdot aren't English majors. We're usually people posting a thought fairly quickly. Even if we know the correct spelling, it's easy to make a typo when you're typing quickly. Sure, you should catch the error when you preview, but not everyone will.

      What you need to learn is that spelling & grammar != intelligence. I know several people who are smarter then me, but who can't spell worth crap. At least one is dyslexic, the others may just have actual important things on there minds.

      Good spelling important in many contexts. Fortunately for us, slashdot isn't one of them. If you're that bothered by the problem, I suggest that you go elsewhere since the problem is fairly pervasive here.

    32. Re:Next step for microsoft by innerlimit · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing... only the pc is waay to slow for Moz/Fox.

      If you want to eradicate IE form your windos install, use 98lite

    33. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strike one for apostrophe nazi.

    34. Re:Next step for microsoft by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      I've seen more anti-OSS/Linux zealots on Slashdot than pro-OSS/Linux zealots. *Much* more.

    35. Re:Next step for microsoft by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      that is 'la voila' you insensitive corperate (sic) clod...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    36. Re:Next step for microsoft by AnyoneEB · · Score: 2, Informative

      FireFox (v0.8) seems to have more bugs than FireBird (v0.7). If it really bothers you, you could just use v0.7. The only difference I've really noticed since installing v0.8 is the download manager.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    37. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In your gay wet dreams of filthy cocks: yes, it is faster. Of course. Now go to your dad and give him his usual after-shitting rimjob, please.

      Why does the microsoft harass us like this????
      We just want discuss Firefox. Open source is not so bad..

    38. Re:Next step for microsoft by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Whatever he is, he doesn't seem to be a moron.

      I expect I'm being anal by pointing out that you're using the word incorrectly.

      He's not being anal - bad spelling does detract from the message. For instance, I can't actually tell whether the original poster made all the mistakes they did on purpose or not. If they were doing it to prove how the brain copes, then it didn't work - I stumbled over the message at every error.

      If the errors weren't intentional, then, oh my.

      And as for the original poster's comment:

      On that note: Notice how of all the intelectual fields the only ones that are anal about spelling are the technical fields?

      Try talking to some authors/writers, or anyone who relies on good communication in their job.

    39. Re:Next step for microsoft by acebone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What you need to remember is that most people posting to Slashdot aren't English majors

      Or indeed native english speakers at all....

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
    40. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who are incapable or can't be bothered to spell words correctly also write lousy code.

    41. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have better then average spelling abilities

      Should be: I have better than average spelling abilities

      I know several people who are smarter then me

      Should be: I know several people who are smarter than me

      This post intended to be humorous. No refunds available.

    42. Re:Next step for microsoft by biggyfries · · Score: 1

      oh, he's probably in Management.

    43. Re:Next step for microsoft by ibbey · · Score: 1

      He's not being anal - bad spelling does detract from the message. For instance, I can't actually tell whether the original poster made all the mistakes they did on purpose or not.

      You're right to a point. However, as long as a message is clear, I don't really care about spelling. One of my best friends is dyslexic, and can't spell worth a crap. But she's also one of the smartest, most articulate people I know.

      The problem with the post that started this thread wasn't that the spelling was bad, but that the content was. Such messages will naturally be filtered out by the Slashdot moderation system. Pointing out that the poster has bad spelling serves no one except to pump up the complainers ego.

      Try talking to some authors/writers, or anyone who relies on good communication in their job.

      As I said, there are times that spelling & grammar ARE important. But in those situations, you usually have some easy way to deal with the issue: A spell-checker, proofreader, etc. I agree completely with those who say that /. needs to include a spellchecker. I can't imagine why one hasn't been added already. But it hasn't, so I will allow a little leeway in the meantime.

    44. Re:Next step for microsoft by rookkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This post is off-topic as is the parent.

      No, it's anal reactionaries like you who dilute the English language to the point of nonsense. Things have gotten so bad, college students commonly submit resumes riddled with typos, newspaper letters to the editor are incomprehensible, and business proposals look wholly unprofessional. And it all stems from slack usage of English in casual settings such as Slashdot.

      It's embarrassing that you think that only English majors should have a solid command of the language. It just shows what a failure today's educational institutions are. When a person makes a typo, he should immediately realize it and correct it. If a person is unsure if the word is "consistent" or "consistant," then he should make the ten-second effort to find out and commit the fact to memory. This is what educated people do.

      What is unacceptable is people that furiously type their thoughts and then do not even look over what they wrote to see if any of it makes sense.

      What you need to learn is that spelling & grammar != intelligence

      Oh, cut it out with the holier than thou bull. If a person cannot effectively communicate his intelligence, then that intelligence is worthless. Smart people cannot get far in modern times without being able to write. And smart people won't be heard if they treat the English language like a redheaded stepchild.

      By the way, have you ever considered readers not fluent in English? When they encounter a misspelled word, they have no way of initially telling if the word is misspelled or if it is a word they just haven't encountered before. How about having some consideration for foreign readers?

      By the way, have you ever considered blind readers who use screen-reading software? When you misspell words, you make your writing inaccessible to the blind. How about having some consideration for the blind?

      People used to have pride in the things they wrote. Now instead of people sucking up their egos and admitting their mistakes, we have people that now argue that making mistakes doesn't matter.

      There is a difference between making an honest mistake and continually choosing not to care. You encourage this recklessness. And now we have college graduates who think spell checking is what word processors do, and not what humans do. Even after running a spell check, students submit papers full of flagrant violations of the language. Because people continually abuse English in places such as Slashdot, they believe college papers and business proposals shouldn't be scoured of all errors.

      Good spelling important in many contexts.

      Good spelling is important in all contexts.

    45. Re:Next step for microsoft by bonch · · Score: 1

      1.) I thought they planned to do that, integrating Firefox at some point and calling it the Mozilla Web Browser.

      2.) How is calling it "Web Browser" taking a page from Microsoft's book? Last I checked, it was Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Visual Studio .NET, etc. I know you're trying to make some point about generic trademarks, but that's why Microsoft prefixes everything with their company name. Besides, "Internet Explorer" isn't all that generic anyway and is actually a really good name for a web browser.

    46. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop browsing at -1 then?

    47. Re:Next step for microsoft by ibbey · · Score: 1

      No, it's anal reactionaries like you who dilute the English language to the point of nonsense. Things have gotten so bad, college students commonly submit resumes riddled with typos, newspaper letters to the editor are incomprehensible, and business proposals look wholly unprofessional.

      As I said, there are places where good spelling & grammar are important. These are perfect examples of such places. Fortunately, it's largely a self correcting problem-- People who submit such resumes don't get hired, their letters to the editor don't get published, and their proposals are rejected.

      And it all stems from slack usage of English in casual settings such as Slashdot.

      Bullshit. I actually agree with you that there is a problem, but Slashdot isn't the cause, just a symptom. Where I disagree is with the public lambasting of anyone who doesn't spell perfectly.

      By the way, have you ever considered readers not fluent in English? When they encounter a misspelled word, they have no way of initially telling if the word is misspelled or if it is a word they just haven't encountered before. How about having some consideration for foreign readers?

      By the way, have you considered that the poster may not have been fluent in English? How about having some consideration for foreign posters?

      There is a difference between making an honest mistake and continually choosing not to care. You encourage this recklessness.

      No, I don't encourage recklessness. I just find people bitching about spelling more annoying then I find the people who have difficulty spelling. As I said, content is more important to me then presentation. It's not the only factor, but of the two, it's the more important. Certainly, if the spelling is so bad that it's content is obscured, then there is a problem. But misspelling "corporate" doesn't rise to that level for me.

    48. Re:Next step for microsoft by ibbey · · Score: 1

      Then & than has always been one of my weaknesses. But you're actually reinforcing my point here. Did my misspelling in any way confuse the meaning of my post? If not, pointing out my error is simply being pedantic.

    49. Re:Next step for microsoft by Svennig · · Score: 1
      You said:
      What you need to learn is that spelling & grammar != intelligence. I know several people who are smarter then me, but who can't spell worth crap. At least one is dyslexic, the others may just have actual important things on there minds.
      What good is intelligence if you can't communicate your ideas properly?
    50. Re:Next step for microsoft by rookkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fortunately, it's largely a self correcting problem

      I see it to be the complete opposite case: grammar and spelling is best corrected at the source.

      People who submit such resumes don't get hired, their letters to the editor don't get published, and their proposals are rejected.

      But people submitting typo-ridden resumes are getting hired, error-plagued letters to the editor are being published (because the proofreaders at the newspapers themselves have no grasp of the language), and people who routinely misspell in business documents are not being fired or reprimanded. Learning suffers, communication suffers, business suffers, and the rest of us have to deal with it.

      Slashdot isn't the cause, just a symptom.

      The cause is teachers who do not flunk high school students who consistently turn in nonsense papers and the parents who just don't care. But discussion groups such as Slashdot do not help the cause when error-ridden posts get +5 Insightful.

      Where I disagree is with the public lambasting of anyone who doesn't spell perfectly.

      The original post that started this subthread humorously pointed out how a supposedly educated man in business could misspell the word "corporate." It was a tongue-in-cheek joke and certainly not an example of "lambasting."

      Misspelling "corporate" is not so bad, but then Felinoid went into a ridiculous rant about how incomprehensible communication is okay. Felinoid even argues that nobody should care about spelling because we'll just let Microsoft Word and paid proofreaders deal with our problems. Ironically, Felinoid's post has dozens of spelling errors in his post. It was a struggle to read through. Had he taken the time and effort to review his prose, I could have read it in half the time.

      By the way, have you considered that the poster may not have been fluent in English?

      Yes.

      How about having some consideration for foreign posters?

      Actually, by politely correcting an honest mistake, the foreign poster learns a valuable tip and avoids misuse in the future. It's better than letting a learner of the language eventually embarrass himself by misusing a word in an important situation. As long as we're not being vicious about typos, everyone wins!

      As I said, content is more important to me then presentation.

      Content is meaningless if the presentation obscures its meaning. In fact, it frequently occurs where someone thinks he learned something, but in fact he learned the incorrect thing because the spelling and grammar implied something else.

      I do not find misspelling "corporate" to be a grievous crime. I do not correct misspellings on Slashdot out of habit. But when people argue that misspelling is a-okay in some contexts, of course I will jump in to set things straight.

      I'm tired of people not taking pride in what they do. Spelling is just one example where people seem to not care about improving themselves. But, it's a particularly important one because so much can be discerned from it.

    51. Re:Next step for microsoft by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      spelling errors distract the reader from the message and make one look uneducated

      Sure, but comments on slashdot are NOT formal writing. If the OP was writing a resume or an important paper, I am sure he would have used a spelling/grammar checker and proofread more closely. But this is slashdot, where people bang comments off to get their *thoughts* in, not show off their proper spelling.

      People like you who dismiss a person's argument out of hand just because they've made one spelling mistake are really missing the point. Did their IDEA make you think? Was it insightful? That's the important thing.

      If you think spelling on /. is bad, try an instant messaging client or IRC chat.

    52. Re:Next step for microsoft by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      I was just about to post a huge apology for actually knowing how to spell. Being one of the few literate people in this world of underpriviledged typists is something that I feel bad about, and consequently I feel I should hide my knowledge to compensate for their inabilities.

      But then! I read your post and I feel good about myself again; I can proudly type "dict underpriviledged" in my Firefox address bar and find that I misspelled it. I feel whole again! Thank you!

      This goes hand in hand with a discussion in another forum I visit about kids being told to not win every race they take part in on a school sports day. To borrow an acronym from the latest poll, WTF? If you are capable of winning, spelling, coding or earning money, you should do it to the best of your abilities at all times, as with everything in life. Let those people who can't do it to the same standard as you rot.
      They will do one of two things; either sling mud at you for being better than they are or seek to improve themselves and their abilities to the point where they feel they have succeeded at achieving their targets.

      I'm a spelling snob, so should you be. We can help people help themselves.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    53. Re:Next step for microsoft by mwa · · Score: 1
      Good spelling important in many contexts.

      Good spelling is important....

      Sorry, couldn't resist. But I absolutely agree with your post. AFAIC, the biggest issue is that <HTML TEXTAREA> does not a word processor make (preview button be damned! You can see your typo in the preview and search for several minutes in the text box and just not see it). Plus, I'm sure there are numerous slashdot readers who are not native english speakers. I'm glad they post in poorly spelled english then correctly spelled anything else.

      I'm a multi-lingual illiterate. I can't read in several languages.

    54. Re:Next step for microsoft by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

      Reread my comment. I do not "dismiss a person's argument out of hand" due to bad spelling. What I said was bad spelling, like it or not, detracts from the credibility of that argument. I said it's probably an unfair reaction (the person could very well be smarter than I), but it's a reaction nevertheless. Some people think spelling and grammar are analogous to table manners.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    55. Re:Next step for microsoft by ibbey · · Score: 1

      Since when does poor spelling equal an inability to communicate? Einstein was dyslexic. Was he dumb? How about Edison? You seem to be under the impression that the only form of communication is written, and that proofreaders don't exist. Fortunately you're wrong.

    56. Re:Next step for microsoft by ibbey · · Score: 1

      Actually, by politely correcting an honest mistake, the foreign poster learns a valuable tip and avoids misuse in the future. It's better than letting a learner of the language eventually embarrass himself by misusing a word in an important situation. As long as we're not being vicious about typos, everyone wins!

      The problem is that there is no such thing as a polite correction on Slashdot. This thread is a perfect example. While the original correction may have had nothing but the best of intentions, you can see where it lead.

      Content is meaningless if the presentation obscures its meaning. In fact, it frequently occurs where someone thinks he learned something, but in fact he learned the incorrect thing because the spelling and grammar implied something else.

      I do not find misspelling "corporate" to be a grievous crime. I do not correct misspellings on Slashdot out of habit. But when people argue that misspelling is a-okay in some contexts, of course I will jump in to set things straight.


      I agree completely. In fact, in the post that you are responding to I said "Certainly, if the spelling is so bad that it's content is obscured, then there is a problem. But misspelling "corporate" doesn't rise to that level for me." I basically agree with the majority of what you are saying. People should take pride in what they write. But at the same time, people should accept that not everyone has great spelling skills. That lack, while it may be annoying, is not a reason to dismiss what someone is saying.

    57. Re:Next step for microsoft by ibbey · · Score: 1

      This goes hand in hand with a discussion in another forum I visit about kids being told to not win every race they take part in on a school sports day. To borrow an acronym from the latest poll, WTF? If you are capable of winning, spelling, coding or earning money, you should do it to the best of your abilities at all times, as with everything in life. Let those people who can't do it to the same standard as you rot.

      I'm not arguing that you should throw the race. I'm arguing that you shouldn't gloat over those who you defeated. If you can spell well, you absolutely should do so. If you want to privately, politely correct someones spelling, fine. But don't publicly post a correction.

      Think of it this way-- would you publicly correct a silly error such as misspelling corporate if it were your boss making the error? Most likely no, you'd wait & do it privately. So why would you do it to a total stranger than?

    58. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me, using correct spelling/grammar is a matter of personal pride. I try to be as perfect as I can in everything I do (although I am not saying I actually am :). And I don't understand people who do not feel the same.

      (Now I just hope I made no mestikes in this text. :)

    59. Re:Next step for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it didn't confuse the meaning. It confuses the reader who pays attention to what he reads. Switching between straight reading and contextual interpretation is a chore, and many brains require the equivalent of a task-switch to handle it. It is rude when another application forces a task switch on your desktop, and it's rude when someone else's writing forces the same switch in your brain.

      All you prove by saying things like "I didn't even notice the error" is that you're not perceptive, or that you stay permanently in context interpretive mode. Reading this way is slower, and more painful. It is a joy to read something clearly written.

      Pointing out the error serves at least one purpose besides the pumping the pointer's ego: it helps notify the original author that they need to pay more attention to what they write (and often that perhaps they're not as smart as they think - an operation that frequently needs carrying out on this site).

    60. Re:Next step for microsoft by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Think of it this way

      If your boss misspelled "coroporate" would you think he didn't know he was misspelling it?
      People on /. aren't my boss, they are people who for the most part can spell and do know how to use grammar to make their reading intelligible. The few posts that make it through the AC filter that are poorly written cause breaks in the rhythm of reading that most people have. Is it small wonder that some people find reading hard work if they only ever read crap like that?

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    61. Re:Next step for microsoft by juhaz · · Score: 1

      By the way, have you considered that the poster may not have been fluent in English? How about having some consideration for foreign posters?

      I don't know what's the case with other people but it certainly seems to me that non-fluent people might actually spot errors better, at least in some cases, since we must think when reading a foreign language, instead of everything being automatic.

      Simple typo doesn't significantly raise annoyance meter here either, but when I consistently see people using teh instead of the or there instead of they're or their, or rouge instead of rogue I'll start seeing red. I know, it's absurd, non-fluent person getting angry because the "natives" don't know how to write their own goddamned language.

    62. Re:Next step for microsoft by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Notice how of all the intelectual fields the only ones that are anal
      > about spelling are the technical fields?

      This is untrue. Language scholars are *way* more anal about spelling than
      people in almost any technical field. Some of the social sciences are
      also rather more careful about spelling than geeks. Historians, biologists,
      geologists, and archeologists all tend to care about spelling more than
      (say) computer programmers.

      Grammar is what geeks and techies are anal about. Screw the spelling; as long
      as it pronounces and the meaning is clear, I'm generally happy. My mind is
      able to work out what the word is, even if a couple of letters are off, and
      the first guess is usually correct, or if not I (almost subconsciously) try a
      handful of "close" matches in context to see which one fits best and go with
      that. This takes almost no time (less than a second generally) and is not
      a big deal. However, if you start playing fast and loose with the grammar,
      using possessives as plurals and that sort of thing, I find it hard to make
      myself read past the first couple of sentences; my parser takes the word the
      way it's written and goes on past, only later getting hung up, and then I have
      to backtrack and reconsider for every word, "is there another word that
      *sort of* sounds or looks like this word that, if substituted, would make the
      parse come out right?" This takes much longer, usually several seconds --
      per instance. If it's an isolated incident, no big deal, but generally the
      people who do this do it several times per sentence. Grrrr. I won't take
      very much of that; I have other things to do with my time.

      So, "intelectual" doesn't bother me (and I mightn't have even noticed it, if
      spelling hadn't been the topic of your post), but if you'd written something
      more like this...

      > Notice who off all you're intellectual fields, only ones that our
      > anal about there grammer our you're technical fields?

      I'd have had a much harder time deciphering that, mostly because of the
      combinatorial explosion of possibilities to consider.

      It also bothers me when in speaking people mispronounce words as other words,
      e.g., pronouncing "you're" as if it were "your", "hour" as if it were "our",
      "our" as if it were "are", and so on. Mere bad pronunciation doesn't bother
      me very much, but when one word becomes another, I have trouble. There are
      a handful of people in my acquaintence who do this, and I usually just smile
      and not whenever they talk and look for an excuse to be busy elsewhere,
      because I don't feel like doing the mental gymnastics necessary to make sense
      of their broken speech.

      (Accents create this effect at first, but after I listen to them for a bit
      I can generally adjust and have little trouble; the information is all there,
      only the phonetics are altered slightly. The exceptions I've noticed are
      the Texan accent (wherein almost all vowells are made long, which makes it
      quite hard to distinguish long vowells from short ones) and, much worse, a
      strong Korean accent, wherein most consonants are not pronounced distinctly
      enough that I can tell them apart. (Aparently Hangul carries most of the
      meaning in the vowells and places little emphasis on consonants, and so upon
      first learning English many Koreans tend to have some trouble with consonants,
      just like we (English speakers) have trouble trying to hear the difference
      between retroflex and dental or aspirate and unaspirate consonants in the
      Hindustani languages.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    63. Re:Next step for microsoft by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of people not taking pride in what they do. Spelling is just one example where people seem to not care about improving themselves.

      You should realize that these people who misspell often have higher priorities than to spell correctly on Slashdot. Many of these people *do* take pride in these higher priorities. But life is short, so we all have to choose what we want to do really well in and what things we will let slide a little. Spelling on Slashdot, for many, will slide.

      Priorities have a great influence on the amount of effort we put into things. Keep that in mind.

    64. Re:Next step for microsoft by LafinJack · · Score: 1

      So why would you do it to a total stranger than?

      Because the original post we're talking about was making a joke about the spelling error, not rubbing it in.

      That's 'then', by the way. ;)

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
  3. I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm calling mine slash org dot.dot so I can use slash dot dot dot to go to aytch tee tee pee colon slash slash slash dot dot dot org... Because it's no sillier than 4 name changes in 12 months.

    1. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by TintinX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It hasn't changed 4 times, it's changed twice, and they have been necessary changes to avoid conflicts with other Open Source projects.
      Remember, FF is not yet out of Beta so a name change is trivial.
      That said, it needs to start building a brand name and that brand will be Firefox. I believe the developers have said clearly that it will not change again.
      Anyway, I love the new FF icon. Much nicer than Moz ;)

    2. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I guess you could count mozilla -> phoenix -> firebird -> firefox.

      That's 4 names but I guess only 3 changes, and only if you really push to count mozilla in the first place

    3. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I guess you could count mozilla -> phoenix -> firebird -> firefox.

      That's 4 names but I guess only 3 changes, and only if you really push to count mozilla in the first place

      Right on there AC.
      Whatever the name its a cracking browser and it seemed to get an extra turn of speed in the last name change so maybe thats a good thing ;-)
      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    4. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by Dan93 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, from what I understand, Firebird, Pheonix and Firefox are just code names. When the browser is released 1.0 it'll just be Mozilla Browser.

    5. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, it needs to start building a brand name and that brand will be Firefox. I believe the developers have said clearly that it will not change again.

      That's what they said the last few times the named changed. pffft, stupid. They need a (better) trademark lawyer.

      Of course it will eventually just be the Mozilla Browser once the current Mozilla is deprecated. Firefox is slated to replace Mozilla entirely at some point.

    6. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe that that may have changed, and that Firefox will remain the brand name of the browser, which - once it reaches version 1.0 - will continue to be available separately to, as well as part of, the suite. That's why so much effort has been expended on the Firefox *image* - the logo, the cute "ads" ("Reclaim the Web", etc) and marketing. Then again, my information dates back at least a few days, so it's possibly out of date already ;)

      The original announcement on mozillazine suggests that Firefox is a permanent name, though I couldn't find other postings about the brand-identity. Like I say, this information is probably out-of-date already...

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    7. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by root+66 · · Score: 1

      > Remember, FF is not yet out of Beta so a name change is trivial.

      Well, Windows isn't out of Beta yet, too. But they still change names and numbers every two years.

      --
      -- I love the smell of Blue Screens in the morning.
    8. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Windows isn't out of Beta yet, too. But they still change names and numbers every two years.

      Apparently your logic and grammar aren't out of beta either.

    9. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by ameoba · · Score: 1, Funny

      To me, the spinning Firefox icon has always looked like a quad-damage glyph that somebody had bitten the corner off. I guess it's more of a "a little bit over two and a half times as much damage" thingie now...

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    10. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by doob · · Score: 1

      If the Mozilla team are worried about building a brand name, they should allow distribution makers to redistribute the icons/artwork. The current Debian unstable version uses the old Firebird art in the about box, and has a really boring icon (just a globe).

      I notice that the Firefox buttons page says "Usage guidelines for the new logos is currently under development.". Hopefully this restriction will change.

      --
      In the spoon, there is no Soviet Russia!
    11. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      Really? I think Windows is not out of Alpha yet. Their "Beta" version is actually a pre-release of Alpha

    12. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aitch is the correct spelling. It was in the National Spelling Bee a few years back.

    13. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      The full naming history goes

      m/b (mozilla/browser) -> phoenix -> firebird -> firefox

      So three changes.

    14. Re:I'm calling mine slash dot.dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 name changes?

      Oh no, it's been far more. Originally this browser started out as "m/b" (mozilla/browser) and was a rebellion against the strict Netscape control over the UI. A few months after work on m/b stopped (Blake and Hyatt lost interest) it never quite became "Project Piglet". Because of project piglet, blake and hyatt regained interest in their abandoned toy and turned the original thing into "Phoenix". Which then required a name change into "Firebird" because of the BIOS people. When the database people started flaming, this name hastily turned into the code-name "Mozilla Firebird" with the stated goal of eventually making it "Mozilla Browser", except that far too many people think that it is just a bad IE-clone and prefer Mozilla proper, and that either hyatt or blake (I forget which one) had severe objections to this future name-change, so to placate the database people (which originally were responsible for the change from firebird to mozilla firebird) another name was sought, which became "Mozilla Firefox".

      Politics suck, even or especially in open source projects.

  4. Random names? by arendjr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I heard it is also possible to let it randomly generate a new name everytime you start Firefox, quite funny :)

    1. Re:Random names? by sanctimonius+hypocrt · · Score: 4, Funny

      "...brought to you by a cadre of flaming geese?"


    2. Re:Random names? by abram10 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you could append a random 4- or 5- letter code to Fire. It may not always be intelligible, but, eventually, you could get something!

      FireBlah!

    3. Re:Random names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok... FireBert.

    4. Re:Random names? by endx7 · · Score: 1

      I heard it is also possible to let it randomly generate a new name everytime you start Firefox, quite funny :)

      Indeed. Right now I'm using Mozilla Lightningunicorn.

  5. What's wrong with Firefox? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember: YOU HAVE TO THINK IN RUSSIAN!

    I like Firefox. What the hell name would I change it to? Who cares anyway?

    1. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by Troed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Parent is not off topic. If you think it is, you've missed out on a good movie.

    2. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by malok2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have tried to get so many friends to switch over to firefox, and their first reactions were:
      1) mozilla ? Their old browsers sucked.
      2) firefox ? It sounds like a firewall software.

      anyways, after taking the time to explain them what firefox really is, they were all convinced.

    3. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by 56uSquareWave · · Score: 1

      Remember: YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT ANGELINA JOLIE!

      no wait thats foxfire, oh well :)

      --
      - meta language used, please apply your own spelling and gramma
    4. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by BRSloth · · Score: 1

      Ok, let's try:

      slashdot.org open ME

      (ahn, oops?)

    5. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by Den_onda_kotten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with Firefox is that it is nearly impossible to pronounce. At least for me who has Swedish as a first language. Firebird was OK and had a really cool sound to it, but whenever I try to say Firefox my tounge just about ties a knot on it self.

    6. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by tepples · · Score: 1

      What's so hard about "fa-ja-faa-ks"? Is it the final "ks" cluster?

    7. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's the point?
      Watch the movie and listen to Clint Eastwoods russian.. *Ugh*..

    8. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by 11223 · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, RUSSIAN THINKS IN YOU!

      (Stupid lameness filter. Go away.)

    9. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I just have no sympathy. I find the only thing more difficult than a Nordic language to pronounce is a Slavic one. I mean really, how many consonants can one string together in one word.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    10. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I just have no sympathy. I find the only thing more difficult than a Nordic language to pronounce is a Slavic one. I mean really, how many consonants can one string together in one word.

      I don't think you know what you're talking about. Scandinavian languages have the same vowel-to-consonant ratio as english. (about 1:2)
      Or were you thinking about finnish? It's not a nordic language. And it's not terribly consonant-rich either. They just make more frequent uses of double-consonants to mark short and long vowel sounds. (hungarian uses accents instead)

      You're wrong about slavic languages as well. They may be lower than english, but probably by not as much as you think.

      One reason is that not all vowel sounds which are pronounced are written. The second is that on translitteration, certain consonants are approximated using several ones. Such as 'ts', 'ch' and 'sh', but they're still a single consonant sound.

      If you want a language that really doesn't have many vowels, and which is actually prounounced without vowels. Check out Georgian. (not the southern accent, the central-asian language)

      "gvbrdgvnis" is a real georgian phrase. And yes, it is actually pronounced without "filling in" the vowels.
      (it apparently means 'he is tearing us apart')

    11. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also worth noting that while english has five vowels 'a','e','i','o','u'.

      The nordic languages have 'a','e','i','o','u','y', the umlauted 'a', umlauted 'o', and 'a' with a ring.

      The difference between the long- and short- vowel sounds is also much more pronounced. In total, the nordic languages actually have far more vowel sounds than english.

    12. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by foxfyre · · Score: 1

      Nothing, but it should be FOXFIRE. :)

      --
      -- Not a /. dude.
    13. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

      The problem with Firefox is that it is nearly impossible to pronounce. At least for me who has Swedish as a first language.

      You have GOT to be kidding me? I see nothing inherently hard about the Firefox name at all.

      Or are you trolling?

      / also a Swedish guy

    14. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

      "gvbrdgvnis" is a real georgian phrase.

      And "hvgrggrpch" is a real Swedish title, although you'll only hear it in the military. :-)

      (short for hemvarnsgranatgevarsgruppchef, or in English, militia grenade launcher squad leader)

    15. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by thrash242 · · Score: 0

      Uhm, I don't know about you, but i pronounce it Fi-ur-fa-ks.

      Where's the "ja" come from? Where's the "r"?

      I do like Firebird better, though.

    16. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by saqq · · Score: 1

      FireCrotch?

      --

      small flowers crack concrete
    17. Re:What's wrong with Firefox? by Den_onda_kotten · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not trolling at all.

      Unless I say the word really slow I'll miss either the 'f' or the 'x' in the word.

      BTW I just got up and asked everybody living in my corridor what they thought, 6 out of 8 thought it was too hard to pronounce.

  6. What about Thunderbird? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Ya know, over all the browser name changes, I've wondered why Ford hasn't sued the shit out of them over the name of the mail client, Thunderbird.

    1. Re:What about Thunderbird? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because it doesn't even vaguely resemble an automobile.

    2. Re:What about Thunderbird? by LetterRip · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably because they are well aware of Trademark law, and realize that they would lose the case since cars are in an entirely different market from webbrowsers and email clients?

      LetterRip

    3. Re:What about Thunderbird? by baxissimo · · Score: 1

      You'd think, but cars and computers may have more in common than you think. At least one automaker thought their brand name would look swell on a computer product.

    4. Re:What about Thunderbird? by fbform · · Score: 1


      Ya know, over all the browser name changes, I've wondered why Ford hasn't sued the shit out of them over the name of the mail client, Thunderbird.

      Why go as far as their mail client? The *browser* used to be called Firebird. As in Pontiac Firebird.

      As to why they haven't been sued (by GM in the case of Firebird), it's because their markets are completely different and the car manufacturers probably realize that themselves.

      Speaking of Thunderbird, wasn't there once a surface-to-air missile named Thunderbird? That would have been an interesting battle had it ever come to Ford-vs-Thunderbird:

      Ford: You have infringed on our tradema... [sees missile]
      Missile dude: You were sayin'?

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    5. Re:What about Thunderbird? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Christ they already have the cars running windows, we should at least be able to read our email while our BMW's brakes fail.

    6. Re:What about Thunderbird? by sepluv · · Score: 2, Informative

      Trademarks only apply to a single product type. Software is a separate category from vehicles for the purposes of trademarks.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    7. Re:What about Thunderbird? by jaxdahl · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the page you linked to? Typical. Here's a quote from the page.


      The Ferrari 3000 from Acer(R) is the only notebook to sport Ferrari Red, a globally recognized color signifying passion, power, style and success. Indeed, the Ferrari 3000 is a striking symbol of cooperation between Acer and Ferrari, each of which has a reputation for technology, innovation and performance. In 2003 Acer became an official supplier to the legendary Scuderia Ferrari Formula One (F1) team, meeting its IT needs with notebooks, PCs, servers and monitors.

    8. Re:What about Thunderbird? by lvdrproject · · Score: 1

      Awesome. I guess he learnt something new today.


      As to why they haven't been sued (by GM in the case of Firebird), it's because their markets are completely different and the car manufacturers probably realize that themselves.

    9. Re:What about Thunderbird? by devnulljapan · · Score: 1
      Probably because they are well aware of Trademark law, and realize that they would lose the case since cars are in an entirely different market from webbrowsers and email clients?

      ...and a TV Show, and a bass guitar, and an MBA school (?!), a civilised (cough cough) 'fortified wine' ...not to mention a religious icon of the People Who Were Here First Before You Came, Took Away Our Land and Tried to Kill Our Culture .

      Probably a lot of prior art.

    10. Re:What about Thunderbird? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Drunk cold, the best buzz a bum can get for the money. But it MUST be cold, serving it warm would be a faux paux in wino circles...

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    11. Re:What about Thunderbird? by baxissimo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I was too terse. Grandparent says basically "Ford would never care about someone using their trademark on a computer related product because they make cars not computer products", and I replied with an example of how an automotive trademark is currently being used on a computer product. All I was trying to say was that Ford might be interested in extending their brands to computing products as well, just as Ferrari has done with this Acer deal.

    12. Re:What about Thunderbird? by dacarr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Have you ever tried using your car to send an electronic mail, or your MTA to drive to the supermarket?

      That's why.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    13. Re:What about Thunderbird? by DA-MAN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about the Ford Explorer (Internet Explorer) or the Lincoln Navigator (Netscape Navigator) connection?

      Seems like browsers are supposed to just be named after cars....

      What's next? the Nissan Opera????

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    14. Re:What about Thunderbird? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the case mod idea. I'm gonna put a Ford badge on my Dell Inspiron. I figure Dell is the Ford of the computer world, right?

      I guess that makes HP the GM, given that GM has several brands of car due to merger and acquisition and HP has several brands of computer also due to merger and acquisition.

      Must make Apple the Avanti, selling very few very stylish very expensive products and always on the verge of bankrupcy.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  7. Black and white vs colour by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    Strange, how it's far easier (at least for me) to see that the sketched black/white drawing is a fox than the coloured rendered version - I thought the coloured version was simply abstract until I saw the sketch :-)

    Who needs computers - bring back sketchpads :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Black and white vs colour by Uber+Banker · · Score: 0

      The coloured one looks like a dinosaur to me, which was totally consistent with the name FireBird as birds evolved from dinosaurs, and the colour was red (like fire). Now I'm left thinking why fox when there's a pic of a dinosaur?

    2. Re:Black and white vs colour by AndyL · · Score: 1

      If it was a really sketchy, super black/white drawing then you'd be able to see that it's really a panda.

    3. Re:Black and white vs colour by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try this anime style one:

    4. Re:Black and white vs colour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must be missing some subtle humour here - that is never a panda.

      Simon

    5. Re:Black and white vs colour by nickos · · Score: 2, Informative

      A firefox is a red panda. Here's a picture of one. This site has some more info, specifically "The Chinese name for red panda is hunho or firefox, due to their colour and similar size to a fox".

    6. Re:Black and white vs colour by Permission+Denied · · Score: 1
      A firefox is a red panda.

      And here's what one sounds like.

      How about that for the Mozilla STARTUP SOUND!

  8. No, boss... by sanctimonius+hypocrt · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is just IE 7.0. Want me to get a copy for everyone?


  9. Old news by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been running Firetoad (and sometimes Firemussel) for 3-4 weeks now.
    The plugin was actually released the same day as 0.8.

    1. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, this is a light, fluffy news piece of no importance, but I too was surprised to see such old news here. Finding something fresh and interesting on Slashdot has become increasingly rare, especially if like me you have an RSS/Atom newsreader and you read weblogs.

    2. Re:Old news by momokatte · · Score: 3, Informative

      The plugin was actually released the same day as 0.8.

      Almost, but not quite. Someone (Dunderklumpen) on the MozillaZine forums made the suggestion for the extension the day Firefox was released, and I released a barebones extension two days later.

      The new news, though, is that the extension finally got a user-friendly interface (no more digging around in about:config) last weekend. The extension has changed a lot over the past six weeks, thanks to the MozillaZine forums users who were interested in its development.

      Original idea - Naming extension - anyone?
      Extension discussion (obsolete) - Firesomething 1.0.x
      Extension discussion (current) - Firesomething 1.1.2

  10. Cheesy... by PoorLenore · · Score: 3, Informative

    about:config also let's you change the 'Mozilla' bit, too. Mozzerella Seasquid here.

    1. Re:Cheesy... by PoorLenore · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's "lets". (Preview-schmeview.)

  11. Hmmmm.... by Yoda2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Along the lines of the post above, I could call it "Internet Explorer" and just tell my employees that M$ released an "upgrade." I could do away with the "real" IE once and for all in one fell swoop.
    /me heads for early Saturday in the office while everyone is gone

    1. Re:Hmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Some moderators still don't get the difference between Informative and Interesting

    2. Re:Hmmmm.... by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Why even lie about it? Just make Moz/FFox the default browser (being able to easily do this and hide IE is about the only thing that came out of the anti-trust suit). If somebody asks where IE went, tell them that it was removed for security reasons (with the exception of that one chick in the payroll office who actually needs to use to to use some webapp that's poorly written that's used to get you paid).

      At least that's what we're doign.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    3. Re:Hmmmm.... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      > If somebody asks where IE went, tell them that it was removed for security reasons

      And what if that's the pointy-haired CEO, who screams and bellows (and fires people) until he gets IE (with no security protection), Outlook Express, etc?

      When you tell him it's a security risk, he says that's what he has computer staff for and implies you're incompetant if you can't make it completely secure. (IE he'll fire you and keep firing until he finds someone who just won't tell him the truth.)

      Been there, done that, gave up.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    4. Re:Hmmmm.... by bccomm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I still think it would be better to teach them that it's mozilla. Joke all you want, but what if they go to windowsupdate.com et al?

  12. So they've finally caught up... by jupo · · Score: 0

    to IE, which has had this feature for years.

    --
    Me I'm a maker, mostly of axioms.
    1. Re:So they've finally caught up... by BigDumbSpaceApe · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      But can you RANDOMIZE your IE titlebar with funny names?!?

      EAT THAT M$ FANBOI!!! MUAHAHAHAHA

      [/sarcam ;)]

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFM.
    2. Re:So they've finally caught up... by jupo · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      --
      Me I'm a maker, mostly of axioms.
    3. Re:So they've finally caught up... by chendo · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, they can :p

      Just code a program that uses SetWindowText or whatever to change it to whatever you want... It works with the "start" text in the start button, IIRC. YMMV

      --
      Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    4. Re:So they've finally caught up... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I believe this is a bit more comprehensive than just changing the title of a window -- it would modify numerous instances of text throughout the application.

    5. Re:So they've finally caught up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done and done.

      int setIETitle( LPCSTR title )
      {
      HWND IEWindow = FindWindow( "IEFrame", NULL );
      int result = SetWindowText( IEWindow, title );
      return result;
      }

    6. Re:So they've finally caught up... by BigDumbSpaceApe · · Score: 1
      *steps back*

      Hmmm, what did i do wrong?...

      [/sarcam ;)]

      Oh, spelling... and i guess proper tag brackets would be nice...

      Okay, ill try this again:

      <sarcasm> And if I want my browser to auto-generate stupid limericks in a foreign language, am I gonna have to code that too?!? Sheesh Microsoft!!! Get with the times!!! </sarcasm>

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFM.
  13. Better? by geekster · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now it has an infinite number of names? Great...

    1. Re:Better? by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is what I thought of when I heard about this:

      A beautiful woman walking gracefully down the street, gets her shoe caught in a crack, hits the ground like a sack of rocks, rolls with the momentum a few times and gets up walking away like nothing happened.

      Firefox's news strategy: "we ment to do that"

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    2. Re:Better? by aonifer · · Score: 1

      A beautiful woman walking gracefully down the street, gets her shoe caught in a crack

      This is Slashdot, not some lesbian shoe fetish site!

  14. hot news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not as if firesomething dates from winter of last year or anything.

    me & my Kenya Tourist Board Hairytapir laugh in your general direction

  15. I know what I want to call it... by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember what Spock's first name was?

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:I know what I want to call it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it was Mister, If I remember correctly :)

    2. Re:I know what I want to call it... by MadChicken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did this get modded down? Here's proof

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
  16. anti-branding.. i like it! by plams · · Score: 5, Funny
    Tech: Tech-support.. how may I help you?
    Me: Hi, uhm... Well, I'm having trouble connecting to the internet..
    Tech: *groan* Ok. What browser are you using?
    Me: Eh.. It says firepanda..
    Tech: Oh? Well, try opening it...
    Me: Ok.... done
    Tech: Now, in your.. firepanda window.. try find a menu called "preferences"
    Me: Uhm.. firepanda?! it says crimsongazelle now..
    Tech: *sigh*
  17. Excuse me, but it's the TV series by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With wooden puppets: Thunderbirds are go... dundundeladee.

    Or the Triumph Thunderbird motorcycle.

    Oooh. Look not a Ford in sight.

    In the real world, not necessarily the one you inhabit, the Thunderbird is a mythical beast from native Indian legend.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  18. How about by beforewisdom · · Score: 1, Funny

    Phoefirebirdfox ?

    1. Re:How about by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Phirebox?

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    2. Re:How about by sharkey · · Score: 1
      <blink>
      Thunderphoefirebirdfoxzilla
      </blink>
      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  19. finally, a reason to switch from... by dankelley · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...mozilla, which seems just as fast, and more full-featured (e.g. mail, calendar). I must be missing something in the enthusiasm for firefox.

    1. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      Simplicity. I don't want a billion features, I just want a simple browser.

    2. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, so being able to change the name is the reason you're finally going to switch??

    3. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by phrasebook · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Simplicity. I don't want a billion features, I just want a simple browser.

      There isn't a billion features, and most of 'em aren't even visible unless you go to Preferences. I had to dig through Firebird's documentation and config file a while back just so I could change the damn cache location on disk - real simple that was.

      Firefox seems like a total waste of effort. It doesn't do anything significantly different to Mozilla, is no faster in my experience, renders pages exactly the same, and has a similar non-standard UI and stupid theme capability.

      So why use it over just a minimal Mozilla install? For a dumbed-down Preferences panel? For a re-jigged download 'manager'? For more bugs? For that special beta feeling you only get with 0.X releases? For the joy of using Thunderbird separately, the Most Buggy Mail Client In The History Of The Universe? Why?!

    4. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So why use it over just a minimal Mozilla install?

      • More extensions than the suite.
      • Better themes. Wide selection, icon and toolbar configuration.
      • Slicker download manager.
    5. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by zonix · · Score: 4, Informative
      I must be missing something in the enthusiasm for firefox.

      Try some of the extensions like AdBlock (block flash, iframes, etc.). The extensible search engine bar is really cool to (get imdb search, DHL tracking, etc.). Not to mention the quick search feature (keyword bookmars)!

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    6. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      There's a simple answer. :-)

    7. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I use other apps for e-mail calendar, so I only need the browser

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    8. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      I like a "dumbed-down" preference panel. I'm far from stupid, but I hate when software is overly complicated. Simplicity wins points with me, not tons of features. Did it ever occur to you that some people don't want multiple applications in one? Like I said, I just want a browser. _I_ will pick the mail client I want to use, not some browser I installed. In any case, nobody is forcing you to even look at it. If you don't like anything about it, then stop posting to topics about it. I hate trolls.

    9. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by phrasebook · · Score: 1

      Just because I don't like the latest browser from Mozilla.org, doesn't mean I'm a troll. You didn't really address any of the points I raised, just ignored them.

      I used the term "minimal Mozilla install" to mean installing it without any of the other components, including the Mail client. You know you can do that right? I choose the client I want to use as well (PC-Pine).

      If you aren't even going to address what I asked, why post either? I still haven't seen a useful set of reasons as to why Firefox exists. Enlighten me?

    10. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      I never claimed to have the answers you seek. I don't know why Firefox is around, but that doesn't even matter to me. I use it because I like it. I know I can minimally install Mozilla. For me though, the simple options menu _is_ enough of a reason to use it over regular Mozilla. Regular Mozilla's option menu is worse than IE's, IMO.

      As for addressing your issues. I did. The rest were just rhetorical troll garbage as far as I could tell. I didn't call you a troll because you don't like Firefox, I called you one because you don't like Firefox yet you are here trying to force your opinions about it on others. Whether or not you like it is irrelevant. Many do, and we are not going to change our views of it just because you say so.

    11. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by phrasebook · · Score: 1

      Whether or not you like it is irrelevant

      Yes I think we know that. Just as whether you like it or not is also irrelevant, and yet that's all you've been saying! I never asked anyone to 'change their views', I simply asked why they have such views at all.

      To that end, the best reason for using Firefox you've come up with is a simple menu structure & options. I don't think you can do much better than that huh?

      Try taking a look at this thread subject. "Finally, a reason to switch from..." (Mozilla to Firefox). And what have you been able to come up with? Nothing more than a single reason why, in your personal view, Firefox is worth it. And you're telling me that I'm a troll, forcing my opinions on others? Idiot.

      Keep it to yourself next time - you're obviously pissed off about something. Bye!

    12. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      Man you are one blind asshole.

      "For me though, the simple options menu _is_ enough of a reason to use it over regular Mozilla. Regular Mozilla's option menu is worse than IE's, IMO."

      One reason is enough for me. I don't need any more reasons. How many times do I have to say that? Why you are on this jihad against Firefox, I can't figure out. You don't have to even LOOK at it, so why don't you keep your troll comments to yourself next time? You're obviously the only one here that is pissed off (once again, about what I cannot figure out). Bye - I'm going to go get some fresh air, something you should seriously think about doing yourself. ;)

    13. Re:finally, a reason to switch from... by phrasebook · · Score: 1

      This again! Sorry to get back to you late.

      One reason is enough for me. I don't need any more reasons.

      I thought we both made it clear that we weren't interested in each other's personal opinions. Again, you're just offering why you use it. You seem to be at least as blind as I am?

      I'll repeat again what I said before: "I still haven't seen a useful set of reasons as to why Firefox exists. Enlighten me?"

      Well you haven't enlightened me at all - I think we can both agree on that!

      Why you are on this jihad against Firefox,

      Come on, it's pretty obvious I'm not against Firefox, I simply wanted to understand in full why it exists.

      Well, it's my fault for asking on /.

  20. Yay for Mozilla Firespider! by hattig · · Score: 2, Funny

    The browser choice for the discerning balrog spider!

    1. Re:Yay for Mozilla Firespider! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear, now I'm running Mozilla Flyingbuttmonkey.

      Maybe I should change the vendor to Microsoft.

  21. Great by r00zky · · Score: 1

    I'm renaming it to FireAvian, so it's compatible with RFC 1149

    --
    I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
  22. Political tool by mrmdls · · Score: 1

    I can see it now, there's the nightly news describing how the web's being used to draw voters attention. with firefox being run as Vote for Bush, or Vote for Kerry. I think I'll just set mine up to say SCO Sucks!!!!

    1. Re:Political tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about calling it "FireBush".

      I would love to see that ;)

  23. Browser formally know as... by peterprior · · Score: 4, Funny

    All this "The browser formally known as..." stuff.
    I'm going to call my firefox "Prince" :)

    1. Re:Browser formally know as... by Sweetshark · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about TAFKAP: The application formerly known as phoenix.

    2. Re:Browser formally know as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is great. I've set up a privoxy rule to change all references to Firefox to Firemonkey. Now I can live in my own little world of fantasy for ever and ever. Sigh.

    3. Re:Browser formally know as... by Imperator · · Score: 1

      Your post would be funnier if you knew the difference between "formally" and "formerly".

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    4. Re:Browser formally know as... by bonch · · Score: 1

      This is off-topic, but what a lot of people don't know is that Prince was battling with his record label, and so he changed his named to "The Artist Formerly Known as Prince" to spite them, something to do with ownership. However, that didn't work, so then he changed his name to an unpronouncable symbol. Perhaps someone else can describe the full story since I can't find it on Google.

      Now he's back to Prince. But most people never heard about all that stuff so they make fun of the guy for being pretentious and full of himself when it was really a behind-the-scenes battle to spite his record label.

  24. On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by multipartmixed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why, you ask?

    When I set up a Windows box for a neophyte (admittedly, not often) I do everything I can to purge Internet Exploder from the system. Some might find this unjustifiable, but the only time I'm ever asked (begged) to help Windows is when a friend of my wife's computer is running badly due to six billion viruses and twenty-two trillion Spyware programs.

    Anyhow. I hunt down all the shortcuts to IE and file associations to IE (i.e. as a viewer, default browser, blah blah blah) and replace them with Firebird. Then, I swap Firebird's icon with IE's icon. (I do a similar thing with with Lookout Express and ThunderBird). I used to even install the IE theme, but it's been busted for a while.

    This will help to complete the illusion.

    Of course, when I'm done, I just tell them I put on a new version of "The Internet" called Mozilla to help them not get viruses and spyware in the first place. I make sure they hear the brand at least a dozen times when I'm talking to them, because I want to build brand recognition. Maybe they'll tell their stupid friends how great Mozilla is and their friends will download it and use it. (Wishful thinking, I know).

    But we all know that telling a Windows user to use Mozilla Fire* instead of IE will far on deaf ears; these people will click that stupid fuckin' blue E because they want to "get on the Internet". You have to make them use something else, or they WILL succumb to temptation and get infected again.

    So far, nobody's come back. Either they hate me now, or they are relatively virus-free; I really don't care which.

    At least my daughter was easier to set up. She knows to use Mozilla (full suite) instead of IE/OE. If she truly *needs* to use IE (i.e. one of her favourite sites doesn't work with Moz), she can ask me to add it to IE for her. I do this by modifying the automatic proxy configuration URL -- if it's on my safe site list, it points to Squid; otherwise it points to an inetd->shell hack which tells her to come and see me.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by peterprior · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This all works well until you get a tech support query, and ask them what browser they are using. They say IE, you say, "ok, go to tools -> options" and everything goes quiet as they can't find that menu option.

    2. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Anders · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least my daughter was easier to set up.

      Yeah, the initial set up is quite easy (especially if you are not the female). But just wait for your daughter to become a teenager.

    3. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a Tools -> Options menu in Firefox

    4. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A very valid point.

      That's why they are trained to say "so and so set me up" when talking to tech support; I know the techs at the local ISP.

      But even so, yeah, I admit this could cause some problems, but a clever tech will out what's going on anyhow.

      The main point being, they don't call *me*. LOL.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    5. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by peterprior · · Score: 1

      Yeah I just noticed that... well.. the actual preferences section and most config options will be different to IE, but I guess I'll just stop reading slashdot and go get some coffee.

    6. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      ...six months to go... I rue the day.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    7. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's why they are trained to say "so and so set me up" when talking to tech support; I know the techs at the local ISP.

      But even so, yeah, I admit this could cause some problems, but a clever tech will out what's going on anyhow.


      Not in my neck of the woods. The braniac for an isp tech here came over to setup my cable internet service was throwing fits because he couldn't find the IE icon on my desktop. I simply told him to "use Firefox.... it's not vastly different from Netscape". He still was dumbfounded. Seriously, a browser is a browser is a browser, and this guy who is being paid to setup internet accounts for subscribers cowered when given something other than explorer to work with.

      Very disturbing... I won't be calling these guys up for tech support anytime soon.

    8. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >At least my daughter was easier to set up.

      I thought so, too. Don't worry, though, I did manage to install my Trojan!

    9. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With some XUL magic it shouldn't be too difficult to make Firefox's preferences dialog look and work more like IE's :o

    10. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by tfreport · · Score: 1

      But they asked him to fix their computer the first time, how many people do you know then turn and call tech support? I have found that the reason people turn to me to fix their computer is because, either:

      a) they do not feel comfortable trying to fix it with help through the phone (including help from me on the phone) or

      b) tech support is crap through that company (not necessarily their advice - it just takes a long time to actually get someone on the phone).

      Either way, they choose to ask someone that posts on Slashdot to help them the first time, wouldn't they do it the second time? At least before calling tech support?

    11. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by urmensch · · Score: 1

      You can't rue the day if the day hasn't happened yet.

    12. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      At what point do you draw a lawsuit from MS though (or at least threatning letters)?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    13. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a verb. You can use the word "rue" to refer to future events.

    14. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      MS might be able to sue if Firefox looks exactly like IE

    15. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Menu text is not copyrightable expression. Lotus v. Borland . Or do you think Microsoft would bring a frivolous lawsuit just to harass The Mozilla Organization?

    16. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Washizu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "When I set up a Windows box for a neophyte (admittedly, not often) I do everything I can to purge Internet Exploder from the system"

      Wait until they have to use some poorly built online banking software or online billing system that blocks Mozilla users. Keeping people in the dark about what browser they're using will give them a reason to badmouth Mozilla for not working properly when they find out what you did.

      I like Firefox, but as long as certain websites require IE you're doing your "neophyte" friend a disservice by "purg(ing) Internet Exploder from the system."

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    17. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by lokedhs · · Score: 2, Funny
      Very disturbing... I won't be calling these guys up for tech support anytime soon.
      Yep. I think they are definately losing sleep over that. :-)
    18. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by lee7guy · · Score: 1

      Or they'll badmouth the offending website for not working correctly (If they don't know they are using Firefox). In that case the complaints are good things.

      --
      Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
    19. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uuuuuuuuuh, last i checked my firefox has a tools --> options. Not sure what your point is.

    20. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Trust me. You don't want it to happen. In my daughter's case, it was like someone flipped a switch on her birthday. Used to be bright and cheerful, now she has the full teenage 'tude.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    21. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      I do everything I can to purge Internet Exploder

      Don't you mean Insecure Exploder?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    22. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I like Firefox, but as long as certain websites require IE you're doing your "neophyte" friend a disservice by "purg(ing) Internet Exploder from the system."
      No, you'r hurting businesses that ecide to set up websites that require Internet Explorer, and I see this as a Very Good Thing (tm). Not because I'd like to specifically be anti-Microsoft, mind you, but there is absolutely NO REASON that any website this day in age shouldn't be able to funciton on all browsers. The web is designed to be a system for delivery of cross-referenced marked-up "documents", which, while having much more/different uses and purposes than their tree pulp counterparts, are quite easily designed to a specific standard. Breaking that standard is breaking the Web, same thing.

      Banking on the Web should be IE only? Imagine the parking lot at the local bank will only allow Fords. What do you do with your BMW then? It runs better, smoother, faster, looks nicer, doesn't include clunky features, and follows the same 4 wheels/brake pedal/steering wheel/etc. standards needed for road use...

      I'd like to hear any good reasons why a website should function in IE on Windows only. Anyone who replies "ActiveX" should be modded +1 Funny.
      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    23. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by porter235 · · Score: 1

      You assume it is the day in the future that he is refering to.. He may rue the day of her conception.

    24. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      You can do that, but it doesn't make much sense.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    25. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not make an exact IE clone that hooks into Gecko? Basically replicate all the "visual" functionality of IE's GUI and embed the Mozilla ActiveX Control into the browser and use that as the rendering engine. The pointless/bad features of IE (eg. Profile Assistant) could just be dummy features that doesn't really do anything. The Address Bar search could be hooked to Google, so on and so forth.. I think this would be a good place to start if you really wanted to create an "Internet Condom" of sorts for Joe Sixpack. (For the more aware users one could always include a hotkey or something that magically enables (unhides a menu?) with great Mozilla features such as tabbed browsing, popup blocker etc.)

      The only problem I can see is that this wouldn't really benefit the Mozilla project at all (read: bad for mindshare) and Microsoft might even end up supporting a third-party browser without knowing it. A message that says "THIS IS NOT INTERNET EXPLORER" in big red letters in the About box would be necessary. It should be an easy task since you wont really need to invent anything new and the size of the binary image could also be kept reasonably small by using bitmap resources from the real IE DLL's.

      Anyway, Just a thought...

    26. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When I set up a Windows box for a neophyte (admittedly, not often) I do everything I can to purge Internet Exploder from the system.

      So your friends and family are screwed when they want to go to a website that only works with IE? Aren't you sweet. I admit they are getting rare now, but verizonwireless.com did it to me the other day. No hint that there was a problem, just one of the menus was entirely missing. Stupid javascript menu (I hate them), but that only way to access certain functions. With out IE, I wouldn't have been able to change my PIN.

    27. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by ddde · · Score: 1

      I've been using 98Lite for years to do this and manually finishing uninstalling IE & Outlook.
      I've never really used Outlook & uninstall it every
      time something sneaks it back on.
      Back in the good ole days I went for many
      years without a Antivirus program. Norton caused
      far more problems than the 2 virus' I got during that time. During that period I got a lot of
      attachments from coworkers. Simply used a file
      viewer to preview them.
      The only time I use IE is to check my webmail
      at Be11s0uth. That site is dumb enough to tell
      me I have to use IE for my security.

    28. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by ameoba · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mozilla is, what we refer to, in theorerical computer science, as, 'Emacs Complete'. This means that it would be a fairly straightforward exercise to implement Emacs in XUL.

      The upshot of is is that, if somebody were ever able to implement Mozilla in a non-bloated way, we'd have a non-bloated Emacs & by extension, have non-bloated versions of countless other programs.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    29. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

      Just wondering: do you have the expertise to write a script to automate this for others? (I'm not being snotty: I don't have that expertise myself.) Or could you put up a Web page with specific instructions (or is there one out there already)?

      There could be Part One: replacing IE with Mozilla/Firefox and making all IE stuff point to Mozilla/Firefox, and Part Two: de-IE'ing the system (e.g., making default URL and Internet Shortcut icons Mozillified, like I do).

      I've done this myself bit by bit on my own systems, but would love a step by step set of instructions to get it done in one fell swoop.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    30. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Bachus9000 · · Score: 1

      ActiveX Sorry, I had to... Oh, I know! IE is more secure...Oh, wait... IE is updated often, fixing bugs and vulnerabilities quickly? It can't be that... Well, I'm out of ideas...

    31. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Vengie · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what scares me more: The fact that I understood that joke or the fact that I found it absolutely hilarious.

      ....load emacs-psychiatrist....

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    32. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Pykmi · · Score: 1

      No, he meant Idiot Exploiter

    33. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by rthille · · Score: 1

      You post on slashdot and you let a cable guy touch your computer? What _were_ you thinking?

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    34. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by erlenic · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, I just changed my pin on verizonwireless.com with Firefox. Or maybe I was just delusional.

    35. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I don't know, the data entry socket was always dropping the connection.

      Luckily I managed to burst transmit the data redundantly just in time so there should at least be one good copy of it now.

    36. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      Fire* Thats a good name. Call it "FireStar". Won't have to change it as often.

    37. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      There is one, and it's called KMeleon. Its development is a bit slow, though...

    38. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by JaxWeb · · Score: 1

      I hope you know not every Windows user is stupid, and not every person who doesn't care about computers is stupid either. Sometimes worth reminding people that here at /.

      --
      - Jax
    39. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      You post on slashdot and you let a cable guy touch your computer? What _were_ you thinking?

      No shit, man. Those cable guys aren't allowed to touch anything on my side of the cable router, including unplugging the ethernet cable from the cable router. If they need that done, I'll do it for 'em. Of course, they try very very hard not to give me tech support anyway because their script is for Windows-only single computer, not a small network of Linux boxes. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    40. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Either way, they choose to ask someone that posts on Slashdot to help them the first time, wouldn't they do it the second time? At least before calling tech support?

      It is for this reason that I refuse to fix a windows computer for anyone. If you're not inclined to learn about your computer and fix it yourself, I'm not going to waste my time doing your dirty laundry. If you *really* want my help, you won't object when I wipe windows off your hard drive and throw on something I can configure once and be reasonably certain you can't break it.

      There won't be any reason for me tell you "Don't run this" and "don't run that". See, I'll tell you once and only once "If you type in the root password to a dialog, and then your computer is mysteriously trashed, I'm not helping you."

      So, yeah, anybody want me to fix their computer? You'll get it back with Linux on it. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    41. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Rue the day? Who says that anymore?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    42. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Wait until they have to use some poorly built online banking software or online billing system that blocks Mozilla users. Keeping people in the dark about what browser they're using will give them a reason to badmouth Mozilla for not working properly when they find out what you did.

      Heh, I don't have those problems. I just run Konqueror reporting itself as IE to get around those problems. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    43. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      You honestly suspect someone would rue sex? Child or no its physicaly impossible to rue sex.... unless she was ugly... or not always a she.

      *silently rues to self*

    44. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by tfreport · · Score: 1

      I completely understand your position. And I don't necessarily disagree. All I was pointing out was that if you were asked to help them the first time in a situation that you installed Firefox and changed it's name, wouldn't they ask you the second time if there was a problem? I think they would. At which point, since you helped them the first time, you would probably help them the second time and if not at least tell them that you installed a different browser so they knew when they talked with tech support.

    45. Re:On a more serious note, this extension is GREAT by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Not only that, there is no Tools -> Options command in IE. The command is labeled "Internet Options" and if the command is not labeled exactly the same thing usually the user will say they don't see it. To add to the confusion, choosing the command in Internet Explorer brings up a window labeled not "Internet Options" but "Internet Properties", the icon in the control panels folder is also labeled "Internet Options" so every place other than the window itself it is called something else. The terms "Properties" and "Settings" are interchanged repeatedly in Windows apps. It has been this way since Windows 95/IE4 So the parents' whole comment is wrong on every angle.

  25. Firefox by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Disclosure: IAACWU (I am a clueless Windows user).

    I loved Firefox's addable tools feature, but then it broke. Could be my obvious ineptitude, but I default back to IE (actually, Avant Browser on top) with a bunch of custom security settings.

    1. Re:Firefox by the_womble · · Score: 1
      Did you do what I did (under Linux though) and keep adding useful tools, most of them in beta, until something broke the browser?

      I found not using too many add-ons makes it more stable. That said these days I use Opera except when I find a site that does not work with it, then I switch to Fire* or Galeon.

    2. Re:Firefox by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      That could be it. I've got the latest build of Firefox (much cooler name) but haven't installed it yet. The "Click to play" Flash feature is something Avant doesn't have yet.

  26. Diluting Mindshare by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, it will not do wonders for Firefox's name recognition if most of its users decide on proprietary appellations. Let's try to increase mindshare by sticking to its official name, and as an added benefit we'll always know to which browser we're referring! Just MHO.

    --
    Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
    1. Re:Diluting Mindshare by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe it won't do wonders for its name recognition but it might do wonders for marketshare if they release a whole Firefox Customization Kit. I think small ISP's and Marketing departments everywhere would jump on it.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    2. Re:Diluting Mindshare by pben · · Score: 1

      Hey it is free software in all senses of the word. It is Saturday so take off your tie change out of your suit and leave the corporate "Mindshare" marking speak at the office. Some things are not markets, somethings are fun. A quick hack that pokes fun at the naming mistakes of the Mozilla team is just fun.

      I thought Linux was about choice! Oops there is a Windows version, I guess you could take it out the Windows version and keep it in for the rest of us.

    3. Re:Diluting Mindshare by ameoba · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the memo. This is, what we, in theoretical quantum wave dynamics, refer to as, a joke. It's not part of the default instalation of Firefox but simply a 3rd party add-on/script that pokes fun at the sequence of namechanges that the project has gone through.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:Diluting Mindshare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Diluting Mindshare

      Arsebiscuit.

    5. Re:Diluting Mindshare by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, it will not do wonders for Firefox's name recognition if most of its users decide on proprietary appellations.
      I don't know, it works well for Microsoft, why not for Mozilla?

      Microsoft: "where do you want to go today?"

      Mozilla: "what name do you want to use today?"

  27. you could do this with IE before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is a registry setting to do this in windows
    http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=176497

  28. And in other important news... by Punchinello · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    - The Eminem looking kid from the IBM Linux commercials makes bowel movement.

    - Technogeek from Kenosha, Wisconsin hears his grandmother say "red hat" and IMs all his friends to let them know that Linux has finally made the mainstream.

    must be a slow news day.

    --

    Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

  29. Can you also change its name to Internet Exploder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for those obnoxious sites that somehow don't understand what "abuse of monopoly power" means...

  30. In the real world by Eevee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thunderbird is the ripple preferred by gentlemen of leasure everywhere.

  31. Cool by anonicon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really like this, hadn't know it existed. Now that I'm running FireBush, my entire browsing experience has become faster, leaner and a whole lot less intrusive.

    Here's to hoping that the Mozilla hackers keep up the technical and political innovations. :-)

    1. Re:Cool by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      "FireBrush"...I dunno, what about "FirePage"?

    2. Re:Cool by uv_light · · Score: 0

      :) Fire_in_the_hole on that FireBush would be cool too.

    3. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I first read your post, I thought you were just saying you had a thing for redheads.

    4. Re:Cool by ax_42 · · Score: 1

      Now that I'm running FireBush, ....

      Secret Service holding for you on line 2, sir.

    5. Re:Cool by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      Now that I'm running FireBush...


      Let's not bring religion in to this.
  32. Linux branding oppoptunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This extension is just what we need to make Linux distributions more freindly to Joe User.

    Whenever you get a Linux distribution, it insalls about 5 differeent web browsers with confusing names such as Konqueror, Mozilla, Lynx, Galeon and Epiphany. There is no need for all those web browsers. And don't scream CHOICE either, you are only going to be using ONE, so why have 5 installed?

    This is where this extension comes in. Linux distributions could now just ship one browser, but customised with their experiance. Imagine Debianavigator, Fedora the explorer, SuSEscape, Webdrake, Genfox and Slackzilla web browsers, with their own themeing, but still firefox internally, and "hardcore" users could still change it back if they wanted by downloading the extention.

    Lindows already ship a customised Mozilla known as "Lindows Internet Suite", so why can't other Linux distributions do this? They already brand KDE/GNOME/ETC with their menu layouts, icons and apps, so why not do web browsers?

    1. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why customise the browser to the distro?

      I agree about only having one browser for Joe User, but Linux's market share seems a bit small to fragment software by rebranding it for individual distros.

      I realise its only the themeing etc, but why should there be a "lindows Internet Suite", "Slackware Web Experience" etc, why not just "Internet Suite" or something else just as simple.

      There are too many levels with linux. There could be a Fedora version that also has different branding per KDE and GNOME inplementations, the same with other distros, so why do it?

    2. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by arcanumas · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There is no need for all those web browsers. And don't scream CHOICE either, you are only going to be using ONE, so why have 5 installed?

      Um, because ,while you may be using only one of them, the Distro-makers can not know WHICH one.
      Therefore.. choice.
      And rest assured that there ARE reasons for choosing one, even if many use the same rendering engine.
      I, mean some people use Konqueror (KHTML) , others Mozilla (gecko) and all the variations (that make a difference on the Interface and features side) , while still others like to browse without X.
      So why whould distro makers remove choice so that you can brag about your "Fedora the exlorer"?

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    3. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by shadewind · · Score: 1

      How are multiple names more user friendly than one single? I mean, what would be easier if the browser had the same name on all platforms? Then users would know "Oh, there's Firefox!".

      --
      I couldn't come up with any better sign....
    4. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fedora the explorer

      If you're trying to avoid trademark suits, I suggest you drop this one.

    5. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by sensei_brandon · · Score: 1

      I use fire* for everything except sftp transactions when i use Konqueror. Also, Konqueror defaults to not showing the annoying "hey! pay up" message really big on lowbrow.com

    6. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fedora the explorer

      Oh man, do I wish I had some mod points to give. That made me laugh... for some odd reason.

    7. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      "Fedora the explorer"

      The purpose of the name changes was to stop using others' trademarks....

    8. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by Qwaniton · · Score: 1

      Sir,

      Slackware would ship "Mozilla", "Firefox", "Galeon", "Epiphany", "Links", "Lynx", and "Konqueror".

      There will never be a Slackzilla. It's just not Slackware.

    9. Re:Linux branding oppoptunity. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1
      Whenever you get a Linux distribution, it insalls about 5 differeent web browsers
      1. How to Train a Linux Distro
      2. Acquire a rolled up newpaper, bucket of sawdust, and can of Lysol

      3. Start installation

      4. When distro installs Galeon after you selected KDE as your desktop, wag your finger at the distro and say in a firm and commanding voice "bad distro". Restart the installation

      5. When the distro insists on installing Epiphany even though you have Mozilla and Konqueror, gently but firmly swat its nose with the newspaper. This will startle the distro into peeing on the floor. Rub the distros nose in the urine, then refer to the sawdust and Lysol to clean up the mess.

      6. By now the distro should have learned that you don't want five different web browsers. However be warned. Distros are stubborn creatures, and you must make them know that you are the boss. Always keep the rolled up newspaper in sight where it can see it, but remember to praise it when it does good.

      7. Occasionally a distro may try to "update" itself at boot time with four other webbrowsers and half a dozen text editors. This distro is untrainable. Return it to the ASPCA and choose another breed.
      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  33. Randomizer lists by nukem1999 · · Score: 1

    I think I'm going to clear and refill my randomizer lists with MGS style attribute / animal names. Although really, Firefox and the default randomizer list populations aren't that far off :)

    Or maybe I'll just set it to run as Mozilla RevolverOcelot all the time. Who knows

    1. Re:Randomizer lists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Mod parent up, this kicks so much ass.

      "What browser are you using?"
      "Solid Snake."
      "...OK, what browser are you using that's not for porn?"

  34. Just call it OpenSourceBrowser... by cnelzie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and be done with it. No need for going all ga-ga about naming it something new every two weeks because the 'Geeks that Be' don't bother doing a simple Google Search to make certain they aren't trouncing on someone else's software product name...

    Yeah, OpenSourceBrowser isn't very 'sexy', neither is OpenOffice.org, but that seems to work for them...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Just call it OpenSourceBrowser... by arendjr · · Score: 1

      At least OpenOffice is an easy to remember and easy to speak alliteration. And the .org is only a formal suffix which no one pronounces anyway.
      Can't really say that for OpenSourceBrowser.

  35. This will "help curb some of the criticism" ?!? by pgrst · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This extension should hopefully help curb some of the criticism that Mozilla has received from its most recent choice of name."

    You mean the criticism that Mozilla cannot come up with a decent and consistent naming strategy?

    Giving users the ability to rename the browser to Mozilla (anything) will really help build brand awareness and promote a consistent naming strategy.........

  36. Fire-star by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This plug-in is kinda funny, and I hope the Mozilla folks can take a joke and enjoy the laugh. But treating "the criticism that Mozilla has received from its most recent choice of name" as if it were a serious issue suggests that the submitter of this article could stand to lighten up and look around. The vast majority of Browser Formerly Known As users seem to have taken to the the name "Firefox" pretty well. As the album cover says: 205,000 Google hits for "firefox browser" can't be wrong.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  37. Xtmprszntwlfd Spock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spock's other name (you couldn't pronounce it, as he told the blonde in "This Side of Paradise") isn't given in TOS or TFS. It is given in one or more of the books if you care to believe them. According to the Officer's Manual (and probably originated from D.C. Fontana), it is Xtmprszntwlfd (pronounced with six syllables). In the novel "Ishmael", it is given as S'chin T'gai.

    -- rec.arts.startrek.names

    1. Re:Xtmprszntwlfd Spock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sad bastard.

  38. New open-source strategy? by plams · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could this be used as legal immunity for linux? So, when SCO decides to sue someone for having an unlicenced linux kernel, they just reply with something like, "Sorry sir McNeal, but I checked this morning.. and what do you know, we actually run Mozillix, Fenix and Bollox... but not linux?"

    1. Re:New open-source strategy? by GregAndreou · · Score: 1

      McNeal? I guess that would be McBride although it does sound a little like a cross between McBride and McNealy. Imagine the potential there. Or again maybe not...

      --
      My freedom ends where someone else's begins
    2. Re:New open-source strategy? by plams · · Score: 1

      Oh, my bad - McBride it is, of course. I must've accidently installed this name randomizer into my brain.

  39. Shizzilla by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    right?

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  40. I'm running... by Stile+65 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nutzilla Firecock. I wonder what other names people have come up with.

    After this article, I'm hoping the Slashdot editors go through the logs and find the funniest client names and post a list (after a few days for people to play with names). I can't wait to see what you bastards come up with! :)

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    1. Re:I'm running... by greenguy · · Score: 1

      I wonder what other names people have come up with.

      Fire Lichen

      Fire Tuna

      Fire Cave Cricket

      Fire Faceless Bureacrat

      Holocaust Cloak

      Fire Lambs And Sloths And Carp And Anchovies And Orangutans And Breakfast Cereals And Fruit Bats...

      Fire Bush In November

      Let Me Stand Next To Your Browser

      OpenFire.org

      Fire Of The Vanities

      Prometheus

      Fire With Fire

      Farenheit451

      Forest Fire

      Flame Broiled To A Nice Golden Brown

      (Note: these were meant to be one word each, but the lameness filter blocks that.)

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  41. Trademarks and Un-offical Builds by HighOrbit · · Score: 1
    If I remember correctly, Mozilla.org was having some heartburn over unofficial builds using the Mozilla name because of Trademark issues (yes, even open source projects can be A-holes when it comes to "stealing" thier stuff). From the mozilla website:

    Our code is free - but we do strictly enforce our trademark rights. Our trademarks include, among others, the names Mozilla, Bugzilla and XUL, the Firefox name and logo, the Mozilla text logo and the red lizard logo. This means that, while you have considerable freedom to modify and redistribute our software, there are tight restrictions on your ability to use the Mozilla name and logos, even when built into binaries that we provide.


    They go on to say that un-modified versions can be redistributed with the mozilla branding, but "all other uses of the Mozilla marks require prior written permission." So, if you are doing any kind of browswer hacking, changing the name/logos becomes more or less mandatory in order to stay on Mozilla.org's good side.
    1. Re:Trademarks and Un-offical Builds by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 2, Informative

      (yes, even open source projects can be A-holes when it comes to "stealing" thier stuff).

      As I understand it, this is a necessary by-product of US trademark law - "enforce your trademark or lose it". Mozilla recently sent out enforcement letters to t-shirt retailers, etc, which has to be the nicest, sweetest, most kindly example of legalese I've ever seen - along the lines of "you're using our trademark without permission. We understand why you're doing this, but we have to ask you to stop. Hope you're not too offended, and if there's anything we can do to help, don't hesitate to ask."

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    2. Re:Trademarks and Un-offical Builds by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      Bad poster, forgot link to mozilla letter, need more caffeine...

      Offtopic: Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment. C'mon, /.! Cut some slack for the stupid!

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
  42. Trademarks by sepluv · · Score: 1

    They are doing this, so that people don't use the Firefox and Mozilla trademarks (and logos)(which they refuse to license without explicit permission).

    Mozilla Foundation probably do not have the right to stop people from using the logos under trademark law, and they certainly cannot stop people using the name or logos if it is made clear that it is only derived from Firefox (but they are trying to anyway).

    Firefox doesn't seem to be a registered trademark in the EU yet anyway, and Mozilla is still registered to Netscape Corporation (now Time Warner) in the US and EU.

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    1. Re:Trademarks by ChimaObialo · · Score: 1

      Mozilla is still registered to Netscape Corporation (now Time Warner) in the US and EU.

      Interesting... I had to see this for myself: Trademark Electronic Search System.

      Search Term: mozilla
      Field: ALL

      searching for "slashdot" also produces an interesting piece of info... but I'm probably either the last to know about this or an idiot for pointing it out
      Oh well...

    2. Re:Trademarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen it myself. I noticed the dead /. trademark differs from the live /. trademark in terms of "products, on-line tools and services via the internet for a select audience." Perhaps if a Slashdot-entitled outfit were to start selling these things, maybe OSDN wouldn't be able to do anything to them?

    3. Re:Trademarks by ChimaObialo · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was pointing to the fact that difference in Slashdot trademark ownerships - Andover.Net (OSDN) vs. BlockStackers (CmdrTaco & Co.)

      I haven't been on here that long, but that's what it looked like to me.

      BTW, use this link instead, then find trademark search yourself.

      Also, maybe I'm making assumptions again, but the "Mozilla" entry seems to have branded merchandise trademarked.

    4. Re:Trademarks by sepluv · · Score: 1
      Have you noticed that the USPTO's search function is not only a .exe but its filename is gate.exe?

      Maybe as in Sir Bilbo of the GatePeople?

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  43. Humour oriented by leoboiko · · Score: 1

    This should have the "it's funny" icon. You can make serious use of the extension, of course, but by default it will generate random names like "LightningCow" or "PowerBadger".

    I modified the preferences to choose names inspired in Japanese tokusatsu. Currently I'm browsing in Mozilla ZyuuraTiga V.

    --
    Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
  44. On a technical note by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is all swell and spiffy, but do we need to standardize an environment variable for browsers, as there is for editors, so that we can still use the system effectively in terrifying presence of 'Leonid_Brezhnevs_eyebrows-er'?

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:On a technical note by sydb · · Score: 1

      $BROWSER? Debian has it.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  45. Doesn't run on SuSE 7.2 boxes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....damn...newer Mozilla builds require at least glibc 2.2.4

    SuSE 7.2 has glibc 2.2.2

  46. i see it differently by G27+Radio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not a very big fan of Mozilla at all--not since Phonix/Firebird/Firefox came out. Mozilla renders quickly, but it just feels clunky and slow to get started.

    I like Firefox because it's trimmed down and has a smaller footprint. If I want to use mail I just start up Thunderbird. The calendar plugin works from both Thunderbird and Firefox.

    I suppose if I regularly needed all the features in Mozilla I'd feel differently. No disrespect to Mozilla, but I really prefer using Firefox and Thunderbird.

    1. Re:i see it differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like FF and TB for the same reasons as the above post. Smaller footprint, oh, and cooler icons.

      I really only use Mozilla these days as an HTML editor sometimes when I can't be bothered typing HTML.

      Actually, what I'd really like to see is composer split out from Mozilla and made faster so it would boot it quicker on low end machines.

      Yeah yeah, so I should get off my arse and do it and not wait for someone else to do it... um, nahh, besides, I can't think of any names aside from FireWeaver and FireFrontpage... which for some odd reason make me feel physically sick.

    2. Re:i see it differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't edit HTML in a text editor?

      What are you doing here? You're not a slashdotter!

    3. Re:i see it differently by timeOday · · Score: 1

      All these name changes have confused me. This article helped tie together phoenix/firebird/firefox, but where does/did Galeon fit into all this? Is there still a Netscape Navigator 7 (or thereabouts) based Mozilla (if so which version?) or is Navigator based on Gecko but not Mozilla?

    4. Re:i see it differently by Rysc · · Score: 1

      http://nvu.com/

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    5. Re:i see it differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla is the organization. Since you use Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird I can see you are at least somewhat of a fan of Mozilla.

      The Mozilla Suite is what you're referring to. :)

      Actually, 1.7 is not bad at all. But I've already switched to Fx/Tb, and see no reason to change back.

    6. Re:i see it differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla/Firefox/[Phoenix/Firebird] use the Gecko rendering engine for displaying the interface and the web pages.

      Galeon uses the Gecko engine but doesn't use it to display the user interface. It just uses the OS's buttons. It's similar to the Avant browser and IE.

      Netscape 7 still exists but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for an upgrade. AOL fired all of it's programmers a while back. 7.02 is based on Mozilla 1.4.1 I believe.

      Netscape is based on Mozilla which uses Gecko. They just changed the look and added AOL junk to it (And removed the IRC client).

    7. Re:i see it differently by G27+Radio · · Score: 1


      The Mozilla Suite is what you're referring to. :)


      Yes. This is a good distinction to make. I think the Mozilla project rocks. The suite doesn't suit me, but that's one of the cool things about the project--I can use Firefox and Thunderbird because that suits my needs. I can use the whole suite if/when my needs change.

  47. Why is this on Slashdot? by glpierce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, but does anyone consider this worthy of being posted to Slashdot? There are a dozen Mozilla extensions that are more functional or more fit for conversation.

    Good for a few jokes, yes; worth a whole story, no.

    --
    G
    1. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and as you and I show nicely, it's good for trolls too.

    2. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by ameoba · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering why the editors didn't put the foot down and make is clear that this is supposed to be humourous...

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    3. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the extension came out something like two months ago. What's next, an article touting GnuPG as the successor to PGP?

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    4. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly is this less deserving than casemodding stories?

  48. I Kind of Like "Firesomething" by citizenc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I vote we get Mozilla to change the name of Firefox PERMANENTLY to "Firesomething". :P

    1. Re:I Kind of Like "Firesomething" by niiler · · Score: 1
      Seconded.

      This would permanantly end the name dispute. Of course if "something" is taken as a wildcard by lawyers, this opens up a whole new can of worms.

  49. Windows Update... by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 2, Informative
    Micrsoft requires IE to do an update. At least I haven't found a way around it. Yeah, Yeah, I know, get off of Windows. I wish, but I can't. (Short version why: my graduate program requires all MS) :-(

    Other than that - Firefox all the way!

    1. Re:Windows Update... by jd142 · · Score: 1

      Set up Automatic Updates to download critical patches and install them every day. You don't need to use the IE interface to do this at all, it happens automagically for the user, and the user won't get hit with the next code red.

    2. Re:Windows Update... by msoya · · Score: 1

      Some places (ie my university) have incredibly restrictive proxies, which even block the Windows Update software - you /have/ to use IE for that.

    3. Re:Windows Update... by jd142 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then they are very stupid. If they're going to do that, they should set up an SUS box on campus and let you all hit that for updates. SUS is Software Update Server, Microsoft's way of letting large organizations easily push out the updates they want their users to have. Admins download and approve MS patches then the SUS box pushes them to clients. You use GPO's to tell the clients where to get their updates from. It's actually quite slick and easy.

      It's like making your own urpmi source for Mandrake and then setting all the clients to hit it as part of a cron job or as part of login. But with the added bonus of being able to easily change the configuration in a central location and have it take effect for all clients.

      And as someone who has been bit by the "you can only use IE to get this file" problem, I can tell you that I would like to bash the person who made it ie specific.

    4. Re:Windows Update... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1
      It's like making your own urpmi source for Mandrake and then setting all the clients to hit it as part of a cron job or as part of login. But with the added bonus of being able to easily change the configuration in a central location and have it take effect for all clients.

      In order to have the config take effect for all clients, couldn't you create an rpm that would update their config, and put it on the urpmi source? Slightly more work yes, but sounds like a pretty good idea to me.

      --
      Why not fork?
  50. Isn't it time to work on essential things? by pe1chl · · Score: 1, Interesting

    By coincidence today I filed a bug in Mozilla because it sends the domain name part of the sender mail address as argument to the SMTP EHLO command when sending mail.
    This should be the hostname of the sending machine.

    As it turns out, this was a duplicate of a bug reported in februari 2001, that is still open!
    That bug in fact talked only about HELO so I did not find it using search. SMTP has been replaced by ESMTP in the meantime, but the issue remains.

    Not that there were no contributions, there are 110 followups on the original report, many of them with good suggestions and patches. But in december 2003, things have again come to a standstill it seems.

    With such issues, that should be trivial to fix in an evening, open for 3 years, I wonder how a change like this got checked in.
    Maybe the remarks about OSS made in another thread are sometimes not that far off the mark?

    1. Re:Isn't it time to work on essential things? by wnknisely · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Firefox is not Mozilla. Firefox does not have a built-in email client Most importantly: The subject of this story is an extension - something that is *optionally* installed by the end-user. It is not something that has been checked into the source by the developers.

      --
      In illa quae ultra sunt
  51. Story I once heard by CdBee · · Score: 1

    I was surfing a tech forum and this guy was commenting on browser-IDs. This was about the time of Moz 1.0 when some sites still only worked in IE and rejected other browsers. He'd been into his site logs and found several visits from a browser called "Fuckstick 3000". Which was puzzling to say the least....

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  52. Godzilla Fireshark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm running Godzilla Fireshark at the moment...

  53. And some people complain...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...about MS products being bloatware. While this functionality may be cute to some it is totally useless on the standpoint of product functionality/stability. I'm glad to see the developers have nothing better to do than to add "eye-candy". Makes me wonder where the priorities are.

  54. one word by compling · · Score: 2, Funny

    thundercougarfalconbird

  55. Thundebird Extensions by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    While switching to linux on the desktop over the past few days, I found myself with a situation that should have been easy to solve.

    I had installed KDE3.2.1, Firefox 0.7 and Thunderbird 0.5. All worked perfectly, but only Firefox had a consistent UI with KDE, Thunderbirds UI was mainly messed up by fonts, which were 1/2 the size of Firefoxes (which is interesting, considering they come from a common source). I hunted high and low for a solution, to get Thunderbirds and Firefoxes UI fonts to look similiar, but the only solution presented anywhere was to install the Gnome Control center, which through I could alter the font sizes.

    This solution proved less than satisfactory, since you cant JUST install the control center, half of gnome wants to come as well. So I eventually solved it myself, hacking the userChrome.xul file and altering the font styles there.

    The thing I want to know is, why isnt this user configurable from WITHIN thunderbird itself? None of the extensions I installed gave me the option (and indeed, AdvancedOptions extension installed but crashed the app each time it was run.).

    Bearing this in mind, I updated to firefox 0.8 and this time the fonts in firefox turned out to be screwed, so i embarked on the same fix, which worked. So obviously the same UI stuff works in both, so why isnt it possible to set these options from within the apps themselves?

    Ok end of rant, I must admit my linux desktop looks fantastic, and the font usage within firefox makes webpages look georgous (i never thought slashdot could look so good!). My only wish now is for a browser that emulated IE, so I can test webpages that I produce. Until this happens, Im stuck with Windows on a few of my systems.

    Finally, congratulations to both the FireFox team and the Thunderbird team. Now if someone would do the same as these two projects but for the Mozilla Calendar app, I think we could have a fantastic trio of applications. (I know I keep saying "someone" or "why cant", I would myself, but after looking into the mozilla source once, I had nightmares for weeks afterward. Its not nice :) )

    1. Re:Thundebird Extensions by forlornhope · · Score: 1

      Try about:config You can configure virtually everything about any mozilla based browser from about:config. Its a nice thing to have.

      --
      "We Don't Need No Truthless Heros!" - Project 86
    2. Re:Thundebird Extensions by petabyte · · Score: 1

      If about config doesn't work use the gtk2 theme switcher. If you get version 2 it can set gtk2 themes and then any gtk/gnome app you have will match KDE (more or less). Germetick matches Kermetic, etc ...

      But its been a long time since I've run KDE so things might be different ...

  56. Letting employees go has never been so easy! by stienman · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hey Carol, why is my browser named 'Fired' and defaults to loser.com?"

    -Adam

    1. Re:Letting employees go has never been so easy! by Entropius · · Score: 1

      As I was scrolling down the page quickly, the name "Fired" caught my eye a bit before the rest of that sentence... and my brain's kneejerk reaction was "Fired? A daemon to change firefox's name?"

  57. So? by guycouch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, it's neat, but it's also been around for quite a while. Are we going to /. every extension that's been written for fire{bird|fox}?

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yes. Yes we are.

    2. Re:So? by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      Ooh! Ooh! Nominations for a slashdotting! Lemme think... Chatzilla or Cards, because then I might get more work done...

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
  58. Re:Can you also change its name to Internet Explod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the site's just screwed. I'm running Opera 7.23, and it still sends me to that page (even though the page itself claims Opera 7 and higher are supported)

  59. A new name suggestion for Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Instead of "Firefox 0.8", we should call it "From Now On I Promise To Include The Community On These Sorts of Decisions 0.8"

    Just a suggestion.

  60. Firefox makes me sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime I see it. It is such a good movie. As long as you leave off the special effects. It would make a great re-make, except for one small problem....

    Here's hoping Putin subverts the will of the people, and casts himself the strong man of the new Soviet Russia. It would do so much for movie, no more eccentric white supervillains. They can go back to the James Bond movies and spoofs of James Bond movies. The Nazi's can rest assured they're not going to be dug up and reused except to possibly close out the Indiana Jones movies.

  61. Easy by mbadolato · · Score: 1

    The precedant was set for us in the late 70's/early 80's via Saturday morning cartoons.

    It's a smaller Mozilla, so Mozuki. Sheesh, was that so hard??? =)

  62. Very useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is useful for the infinite number of monkeys on an infinite number of typewriters who type a great novel but happen to write "mozilla firekasoninsplat" at some point in it. Before, the novel would have been wrong and you would have had to throw it away. Now, it is acceptable and you can publish it and earn millions.

  63. Book of Mozilla by Zephyr_in · · Score: 2, Funny
    It even adds "newly discovered passages from the Book of Mozilla"

    about:firefox
    And so at last the beast fell and the unbelievers rejoiced. But all was not lost, for from the ash rose a great bird. The bird gazed down upon the unbelievers and cast fire and thunder upon them. For the beast had been reborn with its strength renewed, and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror.
    from The Book of Mozilla, 7:15

    about:firesomething
    And there was a great commotion among the believers and nonbelievers alike, for they saw a great fox of fire and knew not its true nature. But just then a faithful believer extended his hand, and offered a gift to the fiery fox. And the fox was enabled to show its true nature as an ever-changing being, and it turned into a great oyster of power. And the oyster opened its shell, revealing a dazzling pearl to all who would look upon it.
    from The Book of Mozilla - Extended Edition, 8:12

    1. Re:Book of Mozilla by repvik · · Score: 2, Informative

      All(?) of the passages are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_Mozilla

  64. Finally by TooLazyToLogon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally I can run Internet Explorer in Linux. Now if i can just get a name change extention for OpenOffice.org

    1. Re:Finally by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 1

      One of my friend "broke" his computer, told him to install Firebird and not install crap. He installed it, but continued to use crap, and whined about his computer crashing and so he sent it over to my house. Once I boot it up, I saw that he renamed his Firebird icon to 'Internet Explorer'.

      Now, he can do what you did too!

      --
      Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    2. Re:Finally by prash_n_rao · · Score: 1

      The force^W source is with you.

      --
      This is not my sig.
    3. Re:Finally by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I was thinking that in the spirit of Firebird and Firefox I'd rename it to Flamebait.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    4. Re:Finally by xmorg · · Score: 0

      I need something that will dodge nasty Javascripts that Say I need IE to use the site. It still says, Im using Mozilla 5.0(firbird/fox/dog) etc....

  65. actually by Zephyr_in · · Score: 1

    about:firefox
    Lo, the bird of fire was magnificent! But a roiling storm was brewing to the south, and dark clouds loomed on the horizon. The bird knew a grim conflict was close at hand and that it could not triumph in its current form. It sat very still, contemplating the situation. Suddenly, in a flash of light and flame, the bird took the form of a great fox the likes of which had never been seen in this land. The dark clouds were scattered to the wind. And all who witnessed this spectacle were awed by its power.
    from The Book of Mozilla, 8:10

  66. Try the user-agent options by Knifethrower · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not sure what browser you are using? You are using Netscape Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firethingy/0.8 (Firefox/0.8 rebrand) Thats my laugh for the day.

  67. Why the user agent string?? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Optionally modifies the browser's User-Agent string to reflect your custom browser name.

    Argh... I can understand it if you wish to access a site that thinks it only works with IE when it actually doesn't, but it's stupid to change it if:

    1. You make the name "Mozilla Seaturtle" or something else "just for fun".
    2. You keep it set to IE's user agent even if you don't need it.

    Why? Because Firefox popularity will decrease in statistics and web masters will feel less reasons to support Firefox when checking their access logs.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Why the user agent string?? by momokatte · · Score: 1

      I knew I was going to garner criticism from different groups (web developers, the Mozilla branding team, purists, etc.) when I added that feature, which is why it's always been optional. It was also added at the behest of other Mozilla users, which is how the extension came to exist in the first place.

      In a successive release I added the option to place the original product string (e.g. "Firefox/0.8") in the User-Agent string comment. Here's what a typical Firesomething UA string looks like:

      Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040210 Waterdragon/0.8 (Firefox/0.8 rebrand)

    2. Re:Why the user agent string?? by Quixo-tastic · · Score: 1
      "Firefox popularity will decrease in statistics and web masters will feel less reasons to support Firefox"
      You're right. But long live the reign of the Steakzilla Web-bunny!

      Seriously, man. Don't be so gloomy. The logs are going to look hilarious because there will be an extra 200 slices of the pie graph that have one or two visits each. There isn't an importa^H^H^H^H^H^H web master that doesn't read slashdot, or hasn't heard of this extension. They'll see "Hyperdonkey" and say "Oh, it's one of those wacky OSS freaks with their zany Firesomething extension."
    3. Re:Why the user agent string?? by SimmonsJ2K · · Score: 1

      Reporting from Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Rubbermonkey/0.8 (Firefox/0.8) to say Firesomething is great, don't get riled, and I don't think it will have any real effect on those who read the logs anyway. I'd bet that a good portion of those who know what Firefox is in the first place will still recognise it with the UAS modified by Firesomething. Especialy if it is commented.. like mine. later

      --
      CK
  68. Extentions are cool by whovian · · Score: 2, Funny

    With all the time I spend exploring all these neat extentions, my boss suggested to me that I call my browser YoureFired.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  69. Windows Update by prandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nor can they go to Windows Update to ensure that their PC is fully patched

    1. Re:Windows Update by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good point. It's worth noting that even Mozillatips recommend keeping IE around for Windows Updates and also certain poorly-designed-but-necessary sites, like certain banks.

      Incidentally, I keep IE as my 2nd browser at work for testing, and also to use the control panel app on a Cobalt Raq box. Irony, eh?

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    2. Re:Windows Update by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, but it seems to me that 99.9% of patches in Windows Update are actually patching Internet Explorer, so this does not seem like a big issue to me. Me, I ignore Windows Update and try to keep a sharp eye on incoming e-mail and an effective firewall. Which I admit may be a mistake, but I don't trust Microsoft monkeying with my system.

      (Yeah, I know: why don't you run Linux then? 'Cause I don't know how to get Peachtree Accounting, Timeslips, Matthew Bender Authority, Kleinrock's tax resources, and various other professional stuff working under it and am not motivated enough yet to figure it out.)

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    3. Re:Windows Update by ashayh · · Score: 1

      There are a number of sources that have all the windows patches available as a complete download. Much better than fiddling around on windows update.
      Like this.
      Autopatcher will install all updates in one go. Will also install java, tweakui and other usefull stuff. Also makes frequent reinstall easier.

    4. Re:Windows Update by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      (Yeah, I know: why don't you run Linux then? 'Cause I don't know how to get Peachtree Accounting, Timeslips, Matthew Bender Authority, Kleinrock's tax resources, and various other professional stuff working under it and am not motivated enough yet to figure it out.)

      To be used solely as a steppingstone:

      Set up Windows box with severely extreme firewall, opening *only* RDP ports. Setup Terminal Server on this box.

      From Linux, use rdesktop to use the windows computer. It's an extra login, but you'll run all your apps natively in Windows and use them from a Linux desktop. Eventually, you'll start looking for replacements for this stuff in Linux, and you'll find them, no worries about that. But as long as you sit on that windows box, inertia will be the real reason you never make the switch. Unless you're not really being sincere about wanting to make the switch....

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:Windows Update by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

      Well, to put it a bit differently, the hassles of dealing with Windows 2000 do not yet outweigh the hassles of switching over to Linux yet. So yes, it could be called inertia. If I were only using the computer non-professionally, I certainly would, but it works pretty well in my law practice and I do not see any particular advantage at present in switching. But I think within a few years Windows will continue to get more restrictive and Linux (and apps) will continue to refine and improve, so eventually I think that's where I will end up.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
  70. isn't there room for a quiet amusing virii in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name changing seems great, but how secure is it? What is stopping someone from writting a cheap javascript that would buffer overflow the title and then allow an attacker to run arbitrary code? Has this been resolved. If nothing else it would be annoying to have the browser change names everytime you move the mouse.

  71. My browsers name is now... by Den_onda_kotten · · Score: 4, Funny

    Firefly!

    You can't take the sky from me.

    1. Re:My browsers name is now... by benasselstine · · Score: 1

      Firedash!

      --
      My other car is a slashdot UID.
    2. Re:My browsers name is now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firebukkake!

  72. GUID! by davegaramond · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course, the answer lies in GUID, which is guaranteed to be unique even across the universe. So no more painful name switching of Firebird to Firefox to Firephoebe, just use

    Mozilla 43c23aa3-7c29-4ce2-96ca-23c751efe5ff 0.9

  73. What to call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it should be called Firefoxbird(again)

  74. what's in a name? by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

    they can call it shit for all I care. As long as it works well, renders websites correctly, and standards compliant, i'm all for it.

  75. Dude! by plopez · · Score: 1

    Now I can have that "Bitchin' Camaro" web browser like I always wanted! Awesome! :)

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  76. Problems with Mozilla and Cobalt? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I keep IE as my 2nd browser at work for testing, and also to use the control panel app on a Cobalt Raq box. Irony, eh?

    That's funny. My site is hosted on a virtual Cobalt server through these guys, and I have been able to operate the Cobalt control panel with every version of the Mozilla suite that I've tried. I'd guess it would also work with Fire*.

    1. Re:Problems with Mozilla and Cobalt? by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      The problem I get is the left nav frame doesn't display - if you can tell me it's a pebkac "problem existing between keyboard and chair" - I'll be eternally grateful: it's embarrasing dropping into IE when I'm always telling my colleagues that Firefox can do "everything and more" that IE can do.

      Note to self: try in Mozilla suite.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    2. Re:Problems with Mozilla and Cobalt? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Which version of Cobalt software is your server running? VirtualCobalts is running Cobalt RaQ servers with Cobalt OS 6.0, which seems to work just fine with Mozilla 1.7b for Windows.

      This is going way offtopic; let's take it to e-mail (tepplesatslashdot@pineight.com).

  77. mIRC and name changing by BMonger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorta kinda off topic but....

    Back in "the day" there were those programs that you could run that would display ads while you were browsing the web. Basically it was a strip along the bottom of your screen. It checked for mouse/keyboard movement and made sure the the foremost window had the name of "Internet Explorer". Well I never browsed the web for more than 15 minutes or so but I was on IRC for hours on end using mIRC. And mIRC let you change the name that was shown in the title bar. So I changed it to "Internet Explorer" and... voila! I received a check from the company the next month for about $25 or so... but I got bored of looking at ads and never did it after that.

    1. Re:mIRC and name changing by HalliS · · Score: 1

      Here's an old site wich lists and describes a few of these programs: click me!

      Some of them seem to still be in business.

      --


      My other UID is 1337
  78. The English word... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    formally known as "formerly"

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  79. Does Sun know about this? by ewg · · Score: 1

    How about "Sun Java Web Browser"?

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  80. This isn't a feature by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    They just needed to set one string variable to the current name of the browser. It's much easier to edit that than go through all the code every 3 months to change the name.

  81. The Gong show by Jahf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh just stick a bag over it's head and call it the Unknown Browser. It is seriously getting that silly.

    And this won't fix the criticism, since it will officially still be Firefox and that is what ISVs will have to certify against.

    Find a good brand for both the browser and mail client and move along please. It is a shame it can't be Mozilla since people are finally certifying on that platform but at least if one is picked (and I don't care if it is "cool" as long as it is not "silly" or easily disdained) we can start re-edumacating the various companies that had been moving towards Mozilla.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  82. Simple solution by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

    We should all start to call it FireStar :-)

  83. Internet Explorer, The browser formerly known as.. by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    NCSA Mosaic. Even the latest version still has this mention so I guess longhorn is going to their first browser.

    BTW, you can change the name of internet explorer to, it just involves lots of ugly registry hacks. Here is a good howto

  84. I never noticed... by GeekDork · · Score: 1

    ... that tech support can be done so well with the voice of Kif.

    --

    Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

  85. What's in a Name? by The+Monster · · Score: 4, Informative
    Bring out an extention for other apps.
    I'm not sure how much of an 'extension' is really required here. I make it a matter of policy in my shell scripts to do
    Self=`basename $0`
    and use that value in the script itself as its name. This way, if anyone ever wants to change the name of the script, they, uh, change the name of the script. The -[Hh]* option for help, as well as any log file names based on $Self , then correctly specify the new name.

    Of course we don't have executables with names like "Mozilla Firefox", because that's not geeky enough. Still, it should be trivial for any app to allow configuration of the name it displays in the title bar.

    I can imagine what would happen, just for example, if The Bride of Monster (Personnel Manager at a sheltered workshop, dealing with handicapped adults) installed a copy of The GIMP on a computer at work, to save their tight budget the expense of buying Photoshop for working up sales brochures and such... Being able to change it so it says 'GNU Image Manipulation' or just 'GNU Image' might save her from the wrath of uptight Politically Correct types.

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  86. How about... by tunabomber · · Score: 1

    Firebert

    Quoth Strong Bad: "Ohhhh! Don't make me call you that- it's not a good commando name!"

    But since Fire{something} is a web browser, not a commando, so maybe the name will work out fine... I guess.

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
  87. phuque fonix by profjohn · · Score: 1

    so, i could rename it to "knetskapesque" and that would help how, exactly?

    --
    - God is pretend...
  88. Slow news day? by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

    I actually came across this plugin last night while looking for a fix to Firefox losing my bookmarks for my toolbar.

    I thought "neat", and quickly moved on, looking for what I was after. It didn't warrant much interest other than that.

    And now when I wake up it's front page material for Slashdot??? What gives? Is Sco suing them or something?

  89. new name by didjit · · Score: 1

    Mozilla Lite, F++ Edition

  90. unpalatable by WhiteDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is so 'unpalatable' about Firefox? I personally like that name. And the animal it is named after, the Red Panda is pretty neat as well. I just switched my mom over to firefox on windows, and she loves it! No more popups! She certainly didn't complain about the 'unpalatable' name.

    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  91. Firefox and msnbc.com by tetranz · · Score: 1

    The only problem I have with Firefox 0.8 is that more often than not, it will not display msnbc.com. I usually just get a blank screen.

    I don't know but if I had to guess I suspect the problem is non-standard html at msnbc.com. I have to wonder how much of that is accidental.

    1. Re:Firefox and msnbc.com by tetranz · · Score: 1

      I just realised that it is related to the popup blocker. If I allow popups it seems to work. I've also heard some say that it matters of you go to msbnc.com, www.msnbc.com or www.msnbc.msn.com but my results have been inconclusive. You always end up at www.msnbc.msn.com so I guess its quickest if we bookmark that.

    2. Re:Firefox and msnbc.com by Sargerion · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to go to that shitty website anyway?

  92. This is a feature that IE already Has by olcrazypete · · Score: 1

    This ability to change the name is something that you can do very easily in Group Policies in IE/Windows. ALot of schools around our local area (my org does tech support and training for the local school systems in GA) have MS IE brought to you by xxxx County Public Schools. This is the type of little things that will allow Firebird to be integrated into a more managed corporate environment. One of the big selling points of a MS solution is that you can control to the Nth degree user's interfaces, the bookmarks that they have, the buttons they have access to, from a remote location. Use a non-MS browser, you lose that functionality, save for some creative scripting, locking of files, etc. I know most see the ultimate goal of a linux desktop with a mozilla/firebird/take your pick now/ web solution. But for the meantime, making this browser friendly to a MS managed solution would go a long way to making open-source a solution for a large instiution. If I were in charge of such a place, I would probrobly mandate its use just because of the time saved cleaning up crap that users get using IE. But convicing others takes stuff like that. P

    --
    -- My dog can beat up your dog.
  93. This would really be funny by lone_marauder · · Score: 4, Informative

    If it randomized the broswer ID in the referrer as well. Unfortunately, I just checked, and it doesn't.

    --
    who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    1. Re:This would really be funny by DgWatters0 · · Score: 1
      If it randomized the broswer ID in the referrer as well. Unfortunately, I just checked, and it doesn't.

      Huh? Referrer is the address of the page that linked to this one. User-agent is the name of your browser software, and that can be randomized along with the title bar.

      I'm happily posting from Mozzarella Spacebadger.

    2. Re:This would really be funny by lone_marauder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I am sort of generally referring to "everything you tell me about who you are, where you came from, and what you want" as the referrer, which I guess isn't technically accurate.

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    3. Re:This would really be funny by glass_window · · Score: 1

      This is too much fun! I think ive restarted my browser 50+ times watching it come up with names. My latest: IE Sucks! Superbunny

    4. Re:This would really be funny by pompousjerk · · Score: 1
      Tools->Options, Extensions, Select Firesomething, click the Options button, and go to the UA String tab.

      I'm currently running
      Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Seatiger/0.8 (All your Firefox/0.8 are belong to Firesomething)
    5. Re:This would really be funny by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      If it randomized the broswer ID in the referrer as well. Unfortunately, I just checked, and it doesn't.

      I just checked and you have to turn this on in the options; it's disabled by default.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  94. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  95. Change name to INTERNET EXPLODER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only company that could claim trademark infringement would be Microsoft and what would they say?

    Microsoft Lawyer (with Adam Sandler cajun accent):
    Judge, we protest in the strongest terms the name chosen by the open source browser formerly known as Phoenix. It is common knowledge that only our browser has the security "features" that can be popularly described as to 'blow up in one's face'. If this hijacking of our intellectual naming property is allowed to continue then the public might wrongly construe that this open source contender gives the same end user experience as our fined product. But only microsoft's browser contains genuine microsoft exploitations such as the worms and the viruses and things that make you go slooooowwwww. We ask you to declare an injunction under the "Truth in Advertising Law" that only Microsoft can use the word 'explode' in its tradenames. Thank you and good day to you sir.

  96. hHeheh by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    I 3 Mozilla Moonpig!

  97. Re:Internet Explorer, The browser formerly known a by mooman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, I was thinking of using this plugin to rename Mozilla to something like Mosaic 0.93b

    I bet few folks these days would get it but other old fogies like me would probably appreciate the tip o' the hat...

    --
    In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
  98. Cool! by kivaapina · · Score: 1

    I'm going to use Firehose, from now on....

  99. Step forward by Bodrius · · Score: 1

    This is a clear step forward in terms of usability.

    In the same spirit, I hope they soon release the extension that re-downloads the source, changes all the variable names to different conventions and recompiles:

    i counters to j, j to i, lowercase to camelCase, camelCase to CamelCaseAsInC#, UPPERCASE to _underscored... the possibilities are endeless!.

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  100. Call it FireStarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If i go this route, I'll call it firestarter so I can log on to Prodigy and smack my bitchx up on IRC.

  101. Phoenix rises from the ashes! by incom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can finally use the phoenix browser again, it's still my favorite name for the software.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  102. what's so bad about firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've been reading that many dislike the name firefox. I for one was rather impressed with their selection. Anyone who has some experience with ceramics will have already heard the name, and I personally think the icon looks pretty sharp :-).

  103. Death Zilla by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    what am i talking about? this..

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  104. Ocelot? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Or maybe I'll just set it to run as Mozilla RevolverOcelot all the time.

    Would you have to press the O key about fifteen times a second to get pop-ups to go away without crashing your browser? It can tell if you're using auto-repeat.

  105. MUSHROOM MUSHROOM by tepples · · Score: 1

    it will generate random names like "LightningCow" or "PowerBadger".

    PowerBadger? What about MushroomMushroom?

  106. New name: Fire---s by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pronounced: firedashes

  107. No, this is not a step forward... by Sargerion · · Score: 1

    ...This is just stupid. Who cares? I think Firefox is a fine name, and the logo looks cool. I mean, what's wrong with a fox? It makes just as much sense as a bird. Foxes are supposed to be swift and clever, right? So what's eveyone bitching about? Get over yourselves.

  108. Gojira is attacking! by Chillywang · · Score: 1

    I'm just changing mine to Gojira and being done with it. Though, for added amusement:

    Firefox is the stupidest browser name ever. In close second is Opera.

    I'd imagine the name change conversation probably went something like... this...

    Mozilla dev team: Designer, what can you draw well?
    Designer: Well I'm pretty good at drawing foxes
    Designer: Sadly, I can draw nothing else. You know this because all the other logos I came up with sucked and were unattractive.
    Mozilla dev team: hmm... Fire... fox? Firefox! BRILLIANT! Make it so! Designer, can you draw a Fox with... fire involved somehow? It has to be red-ish and ill-pleasing to the eyes. And we only want 24 bit PNGs sent to us because we're open source zealot nazifags. Oh, and while you're at it, make the font on the website four points larger, Danke.
    Designer: Sehr gut, mein Fuhrer!

    In fact, the name is so stupid that some awesome person developed this plug-in to change it.

    --
    See you space cowboy...
  109. IE can be renamed too by Temsi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Editing the Windows registry allows you to change the name in the title bar of Internet Explorer.

    Mine currently says "Internet Exploder".

    How?
    I'm glad you asked, here's how:

    Look for Window Title under
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Intern et Explorer\Main
    If Window Title doesn't exist there, create it as a new String Value, edit the value with whatever name you want, restart your IE and enjoy the new name.

    --
    -- This sig for rent.
  110. Who cares? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that thinks this is the most useless extension ever? Who cares what the browser is called, that doesn't actually change anything. They could call it a 32-byte string of random characters for all I care, if it does as good a job at browsing, I'm happy.

  111. Yeah, but... by srcosmo · · Score: 1
    As the album cover says: 205,000 Google hits for "firefox browser" can't be wrong.
    Searched the web for firebird browser. Results 1 - 10 of about 273,000.


    So it still has a ways to go :)

    --
    free speach
    Did you mean: free speech
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      When you consider that the name "Firefox" was first unveiled only 7 weeks ago, I'd say near-parity with its predecessor represents pretty wide usage.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  112. A much better extension would be by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    one that allows you to select you the User Agent string to misrepresent yourself as Explorer or an older version of Mozilla. That could be handy at times.

    1. Re:A much better extension would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's existed for *years*. http://uabar.mozdev.org
      There are other extensions which allow UA switching - Prefbar being the only one I can recall.
      Hell, you can even do it yourself, via about:config.

  113. Offtopic: Firefox is amazing. by master_p · · Score: 1

    I would like to take this opportunity to show my admiration of Mozilla Firefox. It is so much better than Internet Explorer:faster, better gui, safer, nicer rendering, better features, nicer configuration!

    Open source software starts to show its benefits. Next step: the desktop and Office suit.

  114. Necessary for distros by MisterBad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering that the Mozilla org is being quite stingy with the Firefox trademark -- you're not supposed to use the icons or name except for the "official" builds -- this is actually really useful.

    It's come up as an issue with the Debian package for Firefox.

    --
    Evan Prodromou | evan@prodromou.name | http://evan.prodromou.name/
  115. have changed the name into "really-good" by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    So you'd better look for a "really-good" FAQ.
    Couldn't resist :)

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  116. Stupid plugin by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

    Who needs this? A waste of resources if you ask me (aside from the clever "Internet Explorer" refs above.

    What I need is a plugin that eliminates that annoying "All downloads completed" alerter. God I hate that thing.

    If there is already one out there, please enlighten this ignorant soul. If not, stop wasting your time writing name-changing plugins and do something useful.

    1. Re:Stupid plugin by momokatte · · Score: 1

      From the MozillaZine support forums:

      ----
      Type "about:config" in the location bar
      find "browser.download.manager.showAlertOnComplete"
      do uble click on it
      change it to false
      ----

      Bringing joy to other people who have a healthy and/or twisted sense of humor has made the time I spent writing Firesomething worthwhile. Plus, I learned a lot of little things about XUL/JavaScript that I didn't know before I started working on the extension.

      In addition -- if you check out my website, you'll see that my other extensions add functionality instead of style.

    2. Re:Stupid plugin by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

      Thank you :) I am too incompetant(heck, just look at my wonderful spelling) to find things like this, and I did not intend to personally offend you, and am fully aware that seeming useless, stupid projects yield much in the way of learning (hell, just look at my crappy website; the byproduct of my desire to learn PHP).

      And as far as twisted humor is concerned; I'm always looking for nifty things to do to my friends PC's, and since most of them use IE, this kind of humor is lost on them. They're subject to the much more cruel "If you didn't use IE for your default browser, I wouldn't have been able to give you that legion of spyware".

      You've fixed my greatest (practically only) gripe with Firefox, so in my eyes, you've just earned status as demi-god.

      Keep up the good work.

  117. Urpmi is better than that... by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 1

    Good point. NB, recently a parallel/distributed mode was added to urpmi that lets you push upgrades out to clients using ssh.

  118. why was this posted on slashdot? by panic911 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Doesn't this seem like something that should be on freshmeat. Is slashdot going to start reporting on every Mozilla (or Firefox) extension ever written, now?

  119. Pollution of referrer statistics by jesterzog · · Score: 1

    It'd be funny to browse the logs if it did, but I'd hope that most people wouldn't do that as habit. It would pollute the statistics for website developers that describe how many people are using Mozilla/whatever, possibly making it appear less popular than it actually is -- at least to the less-educated.

    If a simple count shows 85% IE and 12% Mozilla, it's much more likely that more emphasis will be placed on Mozilla support than if it showed 85% IE and 15% unidentifiable... in which case it's probably more likely for a typical admin to simply support IE and request that anyone who cares switches to it.

    In either case, a good developer would hopefully at least code to standards wherever possible, but not all developers are perfect and depending on the application it's not always possible to do something using available published standards.

    1. Re:Pollution of referrer statistics by lone_marauder · · Score: 1

      It would pollute the statistics for website developers that describe how many people are using Mozilla/whatever, possibly making it appear less popular than it actually is

      Agreed, but I would rather web developers think in terms of standards as opposed to platforms. I would like it if web developers knew they couldn't trust the useragent strings, referrer, etc. to define presentation behavior, because in practice, that capability goes beyond controlling presentation behavior. Many web sites use the referrer header to block deep linking, and the useragent string to deliberately make a particular browser appear to be broken.

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
  120. TCO by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    At least my daughter was easier to set up.

    Yeah, the initial set up is quite easy (especially if you are not the female). But just wait for your daughter to become a teenager.


    Ah yes, the dreaded "Total Cost of Ownership" strikes again.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:TCO by gareth6889 · · Score: 0

      You should open source her to the community :)

      I just hope she doesn't get forked!

  121. Aaah! by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    Too... "kawaii"... the goggles they do nothing!

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Aaah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ofcourse it's kawaii. It's anime, it's supposed to be kawaii. Anime is the japanese people's evil tool to get westerners so softened and weak they'll provide only minimal resistance when WWIII starts.

  122. OpenBrowser by teneighty · · Score: 1

    Or it could be shortened to "OpenBrowser"

    However, the Mozilla people probably want to brand it, so perhaps it should simply be:

    "MozillaBrowser"

  123. Slow news day? by hwestiii · · Score: 0, Troll

    refer to subject.

  124. O/T by ZxCv · · Score: 1

    (although it's likely still better than the morons who think Q7 offsuit is worth calling a raise with)

    Thats a pretty blanket statement. I can think of a number of situations off-hand where calling a raise with Q7 offsuit would be a smart play.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  125. the point is...... by crashoverride025 · · Score: 1

    Wow you can change the name, whats so important about this "feature" sure you can go into the source code and change a few strings but why waste time and change the name? Its not going to be a different browser because you changed the name.......

  126. Re:Hey! Tim Roberts! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    Gotta love it. Someone didn't take his happy pills today.

  127. sweet.... Fireslut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who's yo daddy

  128. KDE can do this too by polyp2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I only discovered this recently so i'm not sure how far back it goes (Im running KDE3.2)

    many Kde applications can be started to display a different name. For example, if you were feeling particularly sadistic you could run konqueror like this ...

    %> konqueror --caption "Internet Explorer"

    although something like

    %> juk --caption "iTunes"

    is probably more palatable

    nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  129. Seeing what you want to see by bonch · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Honestly, I have never noticed Firefox or Mozilla to be faster than IE. Ignoring the fact that IE's DLLs are loaded into memory on startup to begin with, Mozilla and Firefox, because they implement all their own native widgets for no good reason, hog huge amounts of memory for me. Loading them up takes forever, opening and closing tabs sucks up resources, and worst of all, just opening menus and moving around in them is slow and laggy because they're not native.

    As a native Windows application tied into the system, IE already has a distinct speed advantage. To pretend Mozilla and Firefox are somehow faster is something I've never been able to do.

  130. Re:Windows Update...(Copy of my earlier post ) by ashayh · · Score: 1

    There are a number of sources that have all the windows patches available as a complete download. Much better than fiddling around on windows update.
    Like this. [autopatcher.com]
    Autopatcher will install all updates in one go. Will also install java, tweakui and other usefull stuff. Also makes frequent reinstall easier.

  131. Isn't it sad... by bonch · · Score: 1

    ...that we don't really know what Mozilla's plans are about Firefox? I remember how Firefox was supposed to be integrated into the suite around, oh, 1.5 or so...that time passed and you haven't heard a peep about any changes. We're up to Mozilla beta 1.7 now. Are Firefox and Mozilla EVER going to integrate all their efforts into Firefox, or will we keep doing this every Slashdot article, where someone asks when they're going to integrate and someone else answers that they don't really know?

    Reminds me of that "Barriers to Open Source" article posted recently, which listed "lack of a roadmap" as one of the negatives...

  132. Have you tried to download it? by melted · · Score: 1

    It appears that it no longer exists.

  133. I'm sorry, I couldn't resist... by Big+Nothing · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, the browser picks YOUR name.

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  134. Re:Uh by Tokerat · · Score: 1

    How about the "REASON" that IE is about 95+% of browser usage on the net?
    Oh, let's shitcan the World Wide Web Consortium because Microsoft stronghanded their own standard to the world. Forget about the fact that http_referrer can be forged, skewing the statistic.

    Microsoft didn't invent the Web, therefore it doesn't belong to them. If they want to pee in our pool they'd better prepare to suffer the concequinces.

    P.S. When I see them doing actual good for the Web (including security/stability) I'll gladly retract that statement.
    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  135. How Many Slashdot Members Does It Take to... by teko_teko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How Many Slashdot Members Does It Take to Change A Light Bulb?

    1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed
    14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently
    7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs
    1 to move it to the Lighting section
    2 to argue then move it to the Electricals section
    7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs
    5 to flame the spell checkers
    3 to correct spelling/grammar flames
    6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
    2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp"
    15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct
    19 to post that this topic is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb topic
    11 to defend the posting to this topic saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this topic
    36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty
    7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs
    4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
    3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group
    13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
    5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy
    4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
    13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs"
    1 slashdot lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again

  136. Germanic 'j'; non-rhotic pronunciation by tepples · · Score: 1

    Where's the "ja" come from?

    From half of the "i" plus the "re". In IPA and SAMPA phonetic transcriptions, in Esperanto orthography, and in the orthographies of most Germanic languages other than English, the letter "j" stands for the sound of the English consonant "y" as in "you" or "yard". The sound of "a" plus the sound of Germanic "j" equals what English speakers call the "long I"; FAH yuh is in fact the same thing as FY uh, being the non-rhotic pronunciation of English "fire".

    Where's the "r"?

    Foreigners may find complicated English words easier to pronounce in a non-rhotic dialect.

    1. Re:Germanic 'j'; non-rhotic pronunciation by thrash242 · · Score: 0

      Ok,well, I understand the j being pronounced like the english "y", (I know some German) but not the fiyuh pronouniation. I never heard the of the non-rhotic thing you mentioned, however.

      I pronounce the "r", so I'm not sure what you're talking about.

    2. Re:Germanic 'j'; non-rhotic pronunciation by thrash242 · · Score: 0

      Ok, I read the link and I know what you mean now. I speak rhotic English, you're referring to non-rhotic, hence the confusion.

    3. Re:Germanic 'j'; non-rhotic pronunciation by wtrmute · · Score: 1

      Of course, "j" sounds as short i in Latin, too (though at that time it was written as an i) -- over time, the neolatin tongues changed the sound to vocalized palatalized alveolar fricative/affricate, while the tongues who took it as a borrowing retained the primitive sound, and that is why IPA and SAMPA use j for short/consonantal i.

  137. not a web browser. .exe client app by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

    most online poker sites are. Some have a java applet.

    You're right in that I don't think it would be possible in a web browser.

  138. Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I remember right, Firefox was the beta codename of FoxBase 2.10 which is now FoxPro and owned by Microsoft.

  139. Never ending name changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter what name they choose it has problems. Why not simply call it MISNOMER. :-)

  140. More Ideas by alehmann · · Score: 1
    This extension is proof that extensions can make Fire* suck less. Here are some others that I would really like to see:
    • Disable the @#$@#% popdown menu that appears when I start typing URLs. I know most people like completion menus; I don't. You can't even turn this off in about:config in Firefox.
    • Map control-Q to File:Quit. Simple, huh? I don't know why this doesn't work by defaults. Obviously the developers feel that their application is too useful to ever be quit ;).
    • Disable all the "security" restrictions on ports. I have a RAID controller daemon running on localhost:1080. Neither Mozilla nor Firefox will let me connect to it for "security reasons". I know it's possible to open individual ports (by mucking around with javascript commands), but AFAIK there's no way to turn off this silly mechanism entirely.
    BTW, the flashblock extension is awesome, even though it hasn't been working on every page for me.
  141. OT but still. by thadeusg · · Score: 1

    >If I acutally wanted to USE this bot, it would be pretty trivial to hack it's resources to change the titlebar

    No hacking required. WM_SETTEXT. Jeez.

    1. Re:OT but still. by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      only on slashdot would writing a program to send a windows API call to change the titlebar text not be considered worthy of the term "hack"!

  142. Re:How Many Slashdot Members Does It Take to... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  143. Question for mods by bonch · · Score: 1

    How is this a -1 Troll? The person claimed there was absolutely no reason for major websites to work on one browser. My point was that the browser they're designed for owns the majority of the net.

    I wasn't trolling, merely stating a reason.

    1. Re:Question for mods by Shurhaian · · Score: 1

      I think that qualifies as more of an excuse than a valid, logical reason.

      --
      NB: YMMV. IANAL. Take the above with a grain of salt.
  144. Re:Who cares? you are the most useless fuck ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are a dumb shit that says dumb things. FOAD fag. STFU fag.

  145. SIR Gates?!!? Movie script possibilities... by ChimaObialo · · Score: 1

    Sir Gates, huh? I did not know that. This sets the stage for future conflicts:

    Now, the OSS Rebels must use The Source to defeat the evil Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire Gates... [deep breath] and his Microsoft Minion.
    They must smash the Windows of the Death Suite aka Office!

    I don't care if I'm not the first person to come up with any of this. This is the first time I'm hearing it, so I am mildly proud of myself. Too bad it's buried this deep in the comments.

  146. Re:SIR Gates?!!? Movie script possibilities... by sepluv · · Score: 1
    I don't give a **** who they give knighthoods to as the things are meaningless anyway. However, if you missed the Bill-Gates-knighted story recently, it gets even better.

    The EU announced it had completed its investigations into MS's criminal activity on the same day as the UK government announced the knighthood.

    I am not joking. I went on BBC Technology News and among the latest headlines were two something like this:

    • EU completes investigations into Microsoft's "criminal business practices"
    • Government announces that Microsft Founder is to be awarded a knghthood for his "innovative business practices"
    The wording was somethnig like that with the quoted words taken from the EU and UK gov. press releases too.

    JOINED-UP GOVERNMENT ;-)

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  147. [ed. OT]: .sig gist ode by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "Reviled did I live", I said, "as evil I did deliver."

    Revered now, I live on. "O, did I do no evil", I wonder, "ever?"

    --

    --
    make install -not war