Slashdot Mirror


Off Grid Via Slow Moving River?

einstein writes "I live out in the middle of nowhere, and I lose power at the drop of a hat. My house is right next to the Susquehanna river, and all the kinetic energy going past my house makes just want to go off grid. Most homebuilt hydro power is lower volume/high speed. What would be a good, unobtrusive way to generate electricity from a high volume/low speed body of water? I'm between two large hydro dams, so the water level is fairly constant, but does tend to fluctuate 4-6ft in the winter due to ice floes and melting snow. I think maybe a miniature version of one of the recent submerged tidal generators might work... Does anyone have some suggestions on how I might go about this project?" More than a few people have done this before.

452 comments

  1. The Romans by panxerox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    did something similar, they had a line of floating grain mills across the Tiber (no ice there though) in the late empire period. Find a good high current area and build a paddlewheel boat basically with the drive attached to a generator and use anchors in the riverbed. It might not generate a steady high elec current so you might want to put in a bank of batteries and converter for peak demand. Since the paddlewheel is in the back the boat draft would break up at least thin ice. With underwater turbines your talking alot of cost both in construction and maintainance. Hers another option http://www.hydrogenappliances.com/hydromauro.html

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:The Romans by mikewas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably easier to build a dock, floating or fixed. A dock is something that the local officials will understand so any permits or approvals should be easy. Then attach the paddlewheels.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    2. Re:The Romans by jkirby · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The paddle Wheel would be perfect to float charge some batteries

      --
      Jamey Kirby
    3. Re:The Romans by snerdy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Joe Sacco's excellent comic documentary "Safe Area Gorazde: The War in Eastern Bosnia 1992-1995" he talks about how the residents of Gorazde built floating water-powered generators in order to run lights and electric applicances like TVs and VCRs during the siege of their town. The generators were called something like "mini-turines?" (I borrowed the book from a friend and have since returned it.)

    4. Re:The Romans by einstein · · Score: 1

      this sounds like a wonderful idea. I already have a floating dock, so I figure an addition to make the dock stick out a little futher... and adding waterwheel might work great!

  2. Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you manage to generate your own power (wind, water, solar, whatever), stay on the grid because YOU can feed the grid, and the power company (usually) has to credit you. Yes, keep some of your own power stored up in batteries, but sell the excess and pay off the costs of setting this up.

    1. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      An energy efficient home in the uk that generates it's own power through wind (people high up on hills) can pull a tidy side income to help pay for that next holid^H^H^H overclocked uber pc.

    2. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by gleekmonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A friend of mine makes over $600 a month by staying on the grid and setting up a few wind towers.

    3. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by madprof · · Score: 1

      There are people in Australia who get money from the electricity people through their solar panels feeding back into the grid too.

    4. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by trmj · · Score: 1

      I believe that's a federal law here in the US, and if not, it's at least a state law here in PA, but I don't know about NY (PA and NY are the two states the Susquehanna river is in).

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    5. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by MrChuck · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm in the process of Solarizing an odd grid house...

      Battery system will add a bit to the cost (but still might be worthwhile for keeping "absolutely needed" systems up (refrigerator)). But unlike solar, rivers run always. You can start without it and power your house, sending extra to the grid and making money on it.

      But note that a Rolls 375AH battery will cost you $600-$700 and you'll want a few of those. Plus charging systems for them. And replacing them every 5-8 years. (tho fuel cell systems are expected to work for this use within 3-5 years).

      HomePower Magazine is online and in libraries and just had something (Feb? March?) on home hydro. It's often used with creeks. You can also buy their entire archives on CD.

      If you need pressure, but don't think your river has it, note that running water into a large pipe and getting smaller makes pressure enough to turn things.

      The easiest way to handle it is with a, er, hill. Divert some of the water off through pipes, let it drop, let it hit your generator and route it back to the river. Filters and cats at the top keep fish out.

    6. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by skilm · · Score: 1

      The Susquehanna is in Maryland too...

    7. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by jdhutchins · · Score: 2, Informative

      You probably have to tell the power people though, and they'll probably be very stubborn. Besides crediting you, there are technical issues associated with feeding the grid. The power grid is carefully controlled, and if you don't do it right, you'll screw it up.

    8. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you stay on the grid make damned sure somebody from the local power company inspects your setup. If the power on the grid goes out and the power company employees are working on the lines, your power generation feeding the grid could be enough to kill somebody.

    9. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yes we're told around here that any and all generators (sources of energy) must NOT feed the lines. as feeding the lines will put electrical workers at risk of a powered line that they believe to be dead. completely against the law to feed a dead line

    10. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by yintercept · · Score: 1

      I imagine that there might also be politic battles over the generative power of the water that flows through the river near your property. Waterways are generally considered public throughways; so you probably have to go through a nasty political process to access to the river.

      Come to think of it, if you wrapped copper wires around the lawyers that will get involved with the project, and hooked up a turbine...

    11. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by wass · · Score: 1
      because YOU can feed the grid, and the power company (usually) has to credit you.

      Yes, this is the best of both worlds. If there is enough current (water) flow, then you can power your house, and possibly even make some $$$ selling back to the electric company. Over time this could offset the cost of the generators etc.

      Additionally, being on the grid will still let you get power from the grid if the water flow is too low or your turbine breaks, etc.

      I don't think, unless you have strong political opinions, going off the grid entirely is a good move. You should definitely stay on as a power backup, and maybe even sell some power back.

      On the other hand, does anyone know the legalities of extracing hydro power from a river? Specifically, I'd imagine the turbines and other things have to be on the user's specific property. So who owns 'the river'? I'd imagine all kinds of crazy protocols to do any construction there, to make sure boats don't get caught in anything, etc.

      --

      make world, not war

    12. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "On the other hand, does anyone know the legalities of extracing hydro power from a river? Specifically, I'd imagine the turbines and other things have to be on the user's specific property. So who owns 'the river'?"

      Whoever owns the water rights. It's just like anything else with a piece of land... there are so many ways to own it that they've been split up. Water rights, mineral rights, grazing rights...

      So if he owns the water rights, that's "owning the river"... that section, anyway. There are still permit issues for the construction.

    13. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Filters and cats at the top keep fish out.

      But what happens when the cats over-eat, get fat and die?

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    14. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Filters and cats at the top keep fish out.

      I know they're meant to be smarter than dogs, but how the hell do cats know to keep the fish out? And do they work in shifts or what??

    15. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "A friend of mine makes over $600 a month by staying on the grid and setting up a few wind towers."

      How much do wind towers cost?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In theory, yes, the local power company often has to buy your surplus. In practice, though, it's often less simple.

    17. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Absolutely: DO stay on the grid. For 2 obvious reasons: 1) what if, you never know, your installation breaks down beyond repair ? 2) it's profitable I am in a monastery in the Netherlands. We are going to generate our own electric power, with windmills ( we are very close to the North Sea shore, have 200+ days of wind per year ). Not only for the monastery-house itself, but also for the candle factory with which we earn our money: heating paraffine eats kilowatts. But even under these favorable circumstances we would be mad to go off the grid.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    18. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU own the part of the river that goes through your property.

    19. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by JPriest · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I recently priced out a system to power a 4 bedroom house. I think I figured out it would cost $20,000 (US) just to power the house durring daylight hours (and offload to grid). At night hours I would have to pull from the grid. I think it is actually a law that the electric company has to buy back extra electricity. The only hard part is that you have to send a pure sine wave, and if the electric company is repairing something with the grid down they have to be aware that you are offloading so you don't zap them (this is called Islanding).

      If I wanted to put the systems on batteries I would have to spend much much more. I don't want ot use half my garage for a pile of car batteries. Anyway, it would take around 30 years to pay off a solar powered system here (north US). I looked at hydro power (as I aslo have a large creek on my property), but few people seem to be selling hydro systems and I would need special permission.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    20. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      Chances are, a lot, plus you have to find somewhere to put them, high up preferably, on 25m polls... Water is by far the cheaper of the 2, and will still through out a fare amount of power.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    21. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by rpeterman · · Score: 5, Informative

      "running water into a large pipe and getting smaller makes pressure enough to turn things."
      This is incorrect. I regularly teach irrigation-related hydraulics classes to professionals in many fields, and this is one of the most common misconceptions about hydraulics. Decreasing pipe size increases velocity, not pressure. Increased velocity in pipes is usually associated with friction loss, or loss of water pressure. Water pressure is only created by the weight of water (with minimal additions from atmospheric pressure) or by mechanical means (pumps).
      Increasing the velocity may be beneficial in certain situations, but in this case I would convert the low pressure, low velocity energy from the river to electricity by using gears, pulleys and other mechanical aids. The river has plenty of mass to drive a large water wheel which would, with a high reduction ratio, turn a small shaft on a generator at the speeds needed to generate electricty.

    22. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by emptor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      'the river' is owned by the People, at least here in the US. All navigable waters are publicly owned. And if you can float a log down it, it's navigable.

    23. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Alchemar · · Score: 1

      I remember doing the electrical work for a methane generator when I was fresh out of high school. I was in southern Arizona, and it was required by law that the power comapany buy any "extra" power generated. Once they got through with all the "suggestions" about keeping the meter feeding power to the farm and the meter feeding the power lines seperate, they ended up wiring the system so that they bought all power form the generator at $.05 per KWH and then sold the power right back to the guy for $0.08 per KWH.(It has been a few years, so don't quote me on the figures, but I remember laughing because he was almost paying twice as much as getting paid for the same power.) They talked him out of putting in the bypass switch so that he could feed his own power. If you decide to backfeed into the grid, do some research and/or get a lawyer involved. The power company is there to make money, and they know that they can usually make up rules and regulations as they need them and not be questioned.

    24. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by madprof · · Score: 1

      As Australia is generally more towards the equator than the US I'd guess that it was a better bet for solar power given better year-round weather. You know it is winter when you need to wear a jumper. :-)
      You can't be far wrong about the horrible start up costs though. I believbe there is a .au government-backed scheme to give money to homeowners who want to do this.

    25. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Due to the high startup cost of solar/hydro/wind power, it will take many years for them to pay for themselves. I'm a little skeptical about the $600 claim unless they guy has dozens of towers, which would be exorbitantly expensive unless he's in the wind power business with lots of investment capital.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    26. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      Once they got through with all the "suggestions" about keeping the meter feeding power to the farm and the meter feeding the power lines seperate, they ended up wiring the system so that they bought all power form the generator at $.05 per KWH and then sold the power right back to the guy for $0.08 per KWH.

      In my state they have to buy from you at a 1:1 ratio until you cross the treashold of generating more power then you use. At that point they can buy it from you at wholesale rates. But if you draw power from the grid at night and feed it during the day they must buy it from you at the same rate you pay until you have the surplus.

      I've seen them do this with simple little watt hour meters that run backwards then you are feeding the grid. Then they can just charge or credit you for the difference.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    27. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by tcgroat · · Score: 1
      Battery storage is rather expensive, because batteries need replacement after 500-1000 typical (50% of charge capacity) use cycles or when they reach the end of standby service life, whichever comes first. The amortized battery costs often exceed the value of the energy (KW-Hrs) they handle through their lifetime. Thus systems requiring less battery capacity per KW output tend to be more economical.

      Selling your surplus output to the power company is the way to do this, especially with a relatively constant power source (hydro). But before investing in the equipment, see if that's possible where you live. The rules vary from state to state, and sometimes even depend on what power company you deal with (public, for-profit private, or non-profit REA). You will need an approved "utility-interactive" coupling device before you connect it to the grid, to ensure your power feed doesn't endanger workers repairing a "dead" line. Because of that safety implication, only Listed equipment will be approved for that application.

    28. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Venner · · Score: 3, Informative

      I could be way off base, but if I remember correctly, all navigable waterways in the united states fall under the dominion/juristicion of the Army Corps of Engineers and it is technically illegal to do anything that alters the river without their approval and permission.
      Ownership isn't the issue. Kinda like it is criminal to drain wetlands, even if you own the property.

      --
      A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    29. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by BJZQ8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The school that I work for just installed a huge 68,000 watt solar panel system to provide electricity. There are 21 "Sunny Boy" inverters that do the DC-to-AC conversion, and we have a breaker in place that disconnects us from the outside if there is so much as one phase lost...which prevents us from frying linemen. In addition, the inverters themselves will switch off within 30ms if there is a total power interruption. If you want to see some pictures, here is a link.

    30. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Compuser · · Score: 1

      He was not entirely off base though. The hill thing
      is basically what will give you your hydro head.

    31. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by RallyNick · · Score: 1
      Decreasing pipe size increases velocity, not pressure. Increased velocity in pipes is usually associated with friction loss, or loss of water pressure.

      I think the grandparent had it right, although he probably didn't write it down properly. The actual pressure in the fluid may be lower but when you put a turbine in front of the high-speed fluid it'll create a significantly higher pressure right behing the turbine. Basically you want your fluid to go fast because you're capturing its kinetic energy, which is proportional to the square of its velocity.

    32. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by mlheur · · Score: 1

      The velocity/pressure changes are what keeps an airplane in the air. I teach ground school to pilots, and thats one of the first lessons, faster air -> lower pressure.

      Bernoulli strikes again.

    33. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by spyfrog · · Score: 1

      Of some reason I find your life story in you sig. even more intressting than you post.

      Perhaps monastery is the future for us all? Damn Luther and his protestantism - no monestarys to join here..

    34. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      Yes, what he said. And when they put in the 2-way meter, they set it to 50k to start. It was cool going to my friends house and seeing it at 45k in the height of summer.

      In Calif, I basically get to bank "hours". If I drive the meter backwards all day (with solar) and draw from it at night, I pay the net difference.

      For an extra $280 to PG&E, I get (and I will) a Time Of Use (TOU) meter. With this, I generate and get theirrate$ in the day and draw at night rates. If rates go up, I'd make more money.

      Peak times are noon-6PM in Calif. So you actually do better to have panels that face a bit west - cheaper the get Western sun and throw away eastern sun unless (like nobody) you have infinite panels. Oh, I also get to add in the arrival of fog all summer around 4.

      The goal is to get to $0 bill. After that, you make crap rates (not sure if they credit against gas usage for that - I get generate power, but not natural gas, so my energy efficient gas stove, dryer and heat don't gain from my PV efforts).

    35. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by MrChuck · · Score: 3, Informative
      And you're not going to get much clearance to put a "large water wheel" onto a widely used river.

      You would have an easier time drawing off the water with a couple 3" pipes.

      If I can take a couple gallons/second and drop it out a 4 inch pipe, it might not be able to turn a small turbine/generator. Coming out of a 1" pipe, FASTER, it will be easier. When I hosed down my brother by putting my thumb over the hose end, he didn't care if the water had more pressure or was faster. It was 45PSI either way, I suppose.

      I friend of my Mom's restored and old mill and, since he owned the property on both sides of the creek, and since it was a mill before, the town gov't people were actually pretty delighted for him to restore the "large water wheel" that had been there. It provides a fair amount of both mechanical and electrical power for his work - it turns lathes and he demonstrated grinding wheat (though how much wheat we need to grind in Western Ma is sort of in question, but he was playing with the "wiring" - mainly leather straps and gears.

      In the microHydro world, you can make power from a small creek. Using a large river and not doing environmental impact reports and living in bureaucracy would suggest water driving a turbine to make power come out.

      The ORIGINAL poster didn't say anything about where s/he lives on his river - if they get 2' of ice or just a gentle glazing on top. He's take different actions in winter based on that.

      But there are pro's and resources s/he can can use to negotiate the mazes that are unfamiliar to most of us.

    36. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Back in the 1980s, IIRC, there were some tax credits to encourage solar panels, but they were eventually killed. Al Gore also suggested it as a tax credit during the 2000 election.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    37. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a good general rule, but some states do limit your rights via law. Usually only if it affects downstream water rights (siphoning off water, dumping raw sewage, mining, etc), but you'd be wise to check with someone who knows before investing serious time or cash.

    38. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember checking out a solar-powered house about 5 years ago on a multi-house tour of energy-saving homes here in Austin. The solar system itself is expensive and so are the batteries. The average payback for solar is about 10 years. But that depends on how many solar plates you have generating electricity. The batteries are expensive and do require replacement every so often (forget the # of years) but only take up about 2ft x 6ft area, not really a lot of space (this house had them outside in a specially built protected 'shed' right next to the house).

      Depending on where you live, you can use several different (passive) methods for keeping your house warm or cool.

      Methods
      --------
      trees - get them big enough to shade your house, you'd be surprised at the temperature difference.
      if you can't get trees, have ivy grow on the walls, this will drop the temperature also by preventing sunlight from hitting the walls.

      windows - use transom windows to create an airflow thru the house near the ceiling. in hot months, this gets rid of hot air by the ceiling. it also helps evaporate moisture off your skin which creates a cooling effect.

      walls - _HEAVILY_ insulate your walls. I've ssen some houses with walls 2-3 ft thick, made out of either straw bales, poured concrete inside cinder blocks, or rammed earth. the insulation is so good, you'll barely touch your heating OR cooling equipment.

      roof - if you put solar panels on the roof and mount them at least 4-6" off the roof shingles, you not only generate electricity, you prevent the sunlight from hitting the roof and thereby warming up the attic. also, put one of those cutouts along the roof peak to help draw off hot air. this place (http://www.scienceonline.co.uk/science_now/green_ roofs.html) even recommends planting grass on the roof if you can do it on your house. here's an excellent link to another website describing this stuff.
      you can also try a metal roof as this will actually reflect a lot of the solar gain rather than letting it soak in. an added bonus is that it will last at least 50 years compared to 25 yr shingles (less replacement cost).

      all these methods will help you in saving electricity, not generating it.

      for generating power, look to wind, water, and sun. you will have to evaluate where you live to see what is best.

      I looked into wind power a few years ago and they have some _very_ efficient systems for generating power, and they are relatively inexpensive (less than $2000).

      with water systems you will need some kind of current to move those waterwheels constantly. however, you will have to find a way to step up/down the speed of the current generating axles to match the needed speed for generating electricity and storing it in the batteries.

      solar power has always been expensive. until they find a way to cut the manufacturing costs for the solar panels, it's too pricy for me compared to the other methods.

      btw, no matter what system you choose, you WILL have to have batteries to store power. that is one cost you will not be able to avoid.

      Good luck!

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    39. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps monastery is the future for us all?

      Might as well. At least then you'll have a legitimate reason why you don't get laid.

    40. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not an elctrician, but it should be easy to set up a system such that it senses when there's power on the other side of your meter and would shut off the flow of power in case the grid fails.

    41. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      initial investment in hardware... conduct a study determining the actual cost... perform a study to prove his solar system was safe

      This all sounds sort of familiar.

      For every person installing a solar photovoltaic system, there are numerous others who would have, but haven't because of the hassle and the costs utilities try to impose

      For every location installing a nuclear power plant, there are numerous others who would have, but haven't because of the hassle and costs others try to impose.

      Hoist on their own petard.

    42. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by OneOver137 · · Score: 1

      Might want to add a flywheel to the system to store mechanical energy and keep the generator spinning at a stable rpm as the river flow velocity changes

    43. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Tree131 · · Score: 1
      you can also try a metal roof

      Not if you live somewhere where there is lots of rain or acid rain. That roof will rust in less than a year.

    44. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been considering going off grid in my next house, and staying connected to the grid to sell off excess power is probably not something I'm going to do... why? Because (in ontario anyways), I not only pay for my power consumption (variable costs), I also pay certain fixed costs (like writing off the former ontario hydro's massive debt).. if I disconnect completely, I'm probably saving a couple of hundred bucks per year in fixed costs alone.
      FWIW, I'm considering a hybrid solar/wind/diesel generation scheme with some passive solar heating and a solar concentrator for hot water (not to mention reclaiming heat from shower runoff, etc.)
      Should be a fun project.. even the wife is stoked :)

    45. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been looking into these Global Yuasa monsters... 2V (so need 6 of them) 1725Ah deep cycle batteries.. 10 year warranty (typically can last 20 years), and only $540CDN.
      link
      total cost $3300 ($CDN) or so.. not a bad price for such a long lived battery bank.

    46. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK most converters can handle this.

    47. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by JPriest · · Score: 1
      Then a Java developer Nowadays a monk

      You switched from Java to Perl?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    48. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol
      Yep, I switched.
      Nope, not not to Perl - the language I now use is neither compiled nor interpreted, I'll have to invent a word for what it is. "Soul-assembled", I guess ?

    49. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm

      You're in Germany ?!

      Had not thought that anybody would express his / her interest in such an evident way.

      You can mail me at janvanoort@hotmail.com for more info, so we donot need to pollute this tech discussion any further with non-relevant topics.

    50. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed it is! I live at its confluence with the Chesapeake Bay, Havre De Grace, MD! Come down and visit sometime :-)

    51. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by einstein · · Score: 1

      If only I had a hill.. I've only got about 100m of river front, and there is not a lot of drop.

    52. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by einstein · · Score: 1

      It really depends on the winter.. this past winter we had enough ice my crazy neighbors were driving their golf cart around on it, and I saw people cross country skiiing acrossed it.

      other winters you could always break the ice.. so it varies wildly.

    53. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by einstein · · Score: 1

      that's been my plan, stay on the grid, if for nothing more than backup, and as another poster said, selling electricity back to the grid would be nice too :)

    54. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Draining wetlands is different; that's a special law, passed just for wetlands.
      The river is a navigable body of water, and so in order to own it you have to
      own all the land it touches; that's the rule. With a pond or lake, this
      means you have to own all the way around it. With a stream or river, you'd
      have to own not just on both sides but all the way up to the source of the
      headwaters; otherwise, it's not yours; it's just passing through your property
      and the public can use it (e.g., for canoeing) as long as they stay on (or on
      the bank of) the river, and you can't interfere (e.g., by damming) unless you
      have cut through all the relevant red tape.

      If it were a dinky nothing stream, you *might* get away with it on the grounds
      of nobody noticing until the structure was years old, but the Susquehanna is
      too major for that; anything you do will be noticed before you finish doing it.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    55. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      if you've got THAT much rain, you won't be using a metal roof anyway. and it won't rust if you hook up a sacrificial zinc anode.

      but you could hook up some waterwheel generators to your rain gutter downspouts. think of all the free electricity....

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    56. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by reaperbean · · Score: 1

      I imagine is it very difficult to navigate a waterway between two dams (as he mentioned)...

      --
      Thinking is good, I think.
    57. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by lazn · · Score: 1

      "Filters and cats at the top keep fish out."

      I don't know about that, cats do like to eat fish, but depending on them to keep the fish out of your hydroelectric generator sounds kind of optimistic.

      ==>Lazn

    58. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Wow, who knew fulton county had such technology.. What kind of work do you do there?

    59. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by BJZQ8 · · Score: 1

      I am the Network Admin for the school district. In practice, that means I have to fix anything that is plugged into the wall, from TV's to computers to copy machines. Of course that includes managing the servers and 200 or so computers in the district. The pictures are all from the new school, which was built (or, IS being built) from the ground up with every solar/geothermal/insulating gadget they could find. I'm a 99 WIU grad myself...strangely enough in Industrial Technology.

    60. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by iangoldby · · Score: 1

      If you need to convert a high flow/low pressure into a low flow/high pressure, you could look into ram pumps. I'm not sure that would help in this particular case though.

    61. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      I wish I had graduated college in 99 instead of highschool.. It would have been a positive influence in my financial situation..

    62. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by BJZQ8 · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling. After I graduated, I worked at a sub-par job in Springfield and lived in a tiny, expensive apartment. I was basically treading water financially. Then I got a surprise job offer, which actually paid less, but was closer to "home." I worked there for awhile, and eventually got another job...which paid 50% more. Then I got another, which paid 50% more...and just recently I've been offered yet another, which pays 100% more. I will admit I graduated into a much better employment market than you did...but trust me, do good at whatever you do, and it will get better. It may take time, but you will prove yourself and be rewarded.

  3. Safety first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Didn't anyone ever tell you that water and electricity don't mix? That's good enough for me.

    1. Re:Safety first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH come the fuck on! It's a JOKE! A bit lame, but still A JOKE. Troll? Please!

    2. Re:Safety first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm the poster of the parent joke, and I'd just like to indicate my offense at the characterisation of "a bit lame".

      It's COMPLETELY lame.

      Thank you.

  4. What the ..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Doesn't everybody have there own anti-matter reactor?

  5. Check out Home Power magazine by no_such_user · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a big fan of Home Power magazine. They focus more on solar solutions, but you'll catch an occasional article on hydro. Best part is you can download the current issue for free (after registration).

    1. Re:Check out Home Power magazine by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Yes, the _current_ issue would propably do the trick.

  6. stating the obvious by monkeyboy87 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    imagine a beowulf cluster of micro turbines....

  7. No, of course not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I generate my power using a quantum singularity.

    1. Re:No, of course not by Dasaan · · Score: 4, Funny

      pfft, a mere toy! I use one of these

      --
      XP is basicly 98 with a lot more extra features to hunt down and disable. --Dram
  8. Motivational Speaker? by niko9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You woudn't happen to wear a 50's era bifocals and live in a van down by the river?

    1. Re:Motivational Speaker? by einstein · · Score: 1

      and I live on a steady diet of government cheese.

  9. Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    What would be a good, unobtrusive way to generate electricity from a high volume/low speed body of water?

    You'll need township approval before even thinking of constructing something that could possibly damn or slow down the flow of water.

    1. Re:Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if he doesn't live in a township and owns the river himself?

    2. Re:Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people own rivers?

    3. Re:Township Approval by virtual_mps · · Score: 4, Informative
      What if he doesn't live in a township and owns the river himself?

      Heh. The susquehanna is the 16th largest river in the united states, not some backyard trickle. It's a navigable river and a major feeder for the chesapeake bay, which falls under federal authority as well as state and regional environmental regulations. Sticking a dam on it is something I'd probably ask a lawyer about first thing.
    4. Re:Township Approval by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      Um, pulling a pair of 3" pipes off (with filter/screen at the top) and running it over to a microgenerator probably won't stop much of the river. or slow it down.

      (he did use the work "unobstrusive" so he's prolly not envisioning a 30' high cross river damn (that might also upset neighbors upstream).

    5. Re:Township Approval by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'll need township approval before even thinking of constructing something that could possibly damn or slow down the flow of water.

      Crap. Better rethink my plans to build a Church of Satan on the bank of the Animas River (in my backyard). The people of Durango might not be too happy that their river has been condemned to eternal damnation, especially since "animas" is Spanish for "soul".

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    6. Re:Township Approval by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      damn or slow down the flow of water

      I don't think water has much of a chance in Hell. ;-)

    7. Re:Township Approval by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are watershead and pollution issues involved as well.

      The state environmental regulatory groups (EPA EPD DEP, whatever) monitor this crap because whenever you take energy from a river system you cause an increase in things like sedimentation--in addition to whatever kind of pollution your system leaks into the water.

      Big power companies get away with it because, well, because they're big power companies, but it's very possible that you'll have to pay some liscensing fees and/or get some kind of water permit/pollution fees.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    8. Re:Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And the local manufacturing plant throwing a gram or two of arsenic into the nearby river won't hurt anybody.

      Now if all neighbors start building pipes, and the company above does this every day, things start to build up quick!

    9. Re:Township Approval by Slayk · · Score: 1

      That might sic some of the Baptists down in Aztec on you, as well.
      Good country up around the Animas and San Juan rivers.

    10. Re:Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "dam"? "Damn" is to swear [at] or blaspheme something.

    11. Re:Township Approval by Snowdrake · · Score: 1

      Ah hell, and I'd have actually made the six-hour drive from Denver, Wolf Creek Pass and all, for that. ;)

    12. Re:Township Approval by gristlebud · · Score: 1

      What if he doesn't live in a township and owns the river himself?

      It dosen't matter. In the US (where the poster is talking about) if surface water either originates off your property, or it eventually leaves your property, it belongs to the state. In fact some states, like California, define all surface or groundwater as "Waters of the State." Your state regulators have the purview to issue permits regarding use of those waters.

      --
      OK...
      I can do this. I am, after all,
      a superhero!
    13. Re:Township Approval by BeazleyR · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, your historical narrow gauge train rides might become more exciting.

    14. Re:Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you should move to Pagosa ;-) All the good places are in the high country outside of town, up into the Weminuche. None of the dumbass tourists looking to hit the 14'ers in Chicago Basin...

      You want to try something crazy? Run the Piedra River in a kayak around late May, early June down out of the forest and into town.

    15. Re:Township Approval by jxs2151 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Oh jeeze people, just put the freakin' generator on the river, shut your mouth about it and wait for someone to tell you to stop.

      With attitudes like this, we would have waited for the proper government bureau approval before dumping the tea in the harbor.

      What ever happened to good old American rule breaking?

    16. Re:Township Approval by diablo943 · · Score: 1

      I used to work at Duranglers (a local flyshop) where we got lots of tourists coming into the area. One day a group of kids from Texas came in asking about the Upper Animas. They said they were on a church trip and wanted to do a little fishing. We asked them where they were going and what they were doing up there and they said it was a bible study retreat up in Chicago Basin (near 10,000 ft). They said they wanted to do some hiking, some fishing, and that their minister was going to baptize them in the Animas.

      We asked them if they knew the full name of the Animas river... I explained the full name of the river is El Rio De Las Animas Perdidos En Purgatorio. The river of lost souls in Purgatory.

      Obviously not the best river to be baptized in! Typical stupid Texans!

      diablo943

      --
      The line between terrorist and patriot depends on which side of the molatov cocktail you are on.
    17. Re:Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soul in Spanish is ALMAS, not animas, in fact I don't know what animas means, maybe some old, really old spanish?

    18. Re:Township Approval by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Build a dock and stick this thing under water, under the dock. No one will ever know.

      Have your own personal project is one thing. Its not like this guy is daming the whole river.

    19. Re:Township Approval by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Actually it's to condemn, which is what makes it swearing, as it's not very nice ;)

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    20. Re:Township Approval by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      wrong. in Texas, water belongs to whomever owns the land it sits on. The Texas Commission on Enivronmental Quality (they keep changing their damn name) does NOT have authority in many areas of water usage as you suggest.

      example - I have a creek crossing my land. it runs for another 20 miles before dropping in to the local lake. in the process, it crosses (or parallels) about 30 other property lines. I can legally dam up the creek to make myself a fishing pond and water my crops with it, thereby using up ALL the water flow, and there is NOTHING that the downstream folks can do about it.
      yes, it's not a nice thing to do and will piss some people off that I have reduced creek flow.

      it's called the "right of capture"

      befire you start spouting off about laws across the country, you should either (1) check those laws, or (2) preface your statement with a phrase such as "I believe...."

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    21. Re:Township Approval by matt-fu · · Score: 2, Funny
      What ever happened to good old American rule breaking?

      You mean besides the DMCA and the Patriot Act?

    22. Re:Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anima and alma are both valid and both mean soul, just checked the dictionary

      but none of both exist in real life :P

    23. Re:Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A friend of mine was brought up on charges for building an un-permitted retaining wall on the shores of a small (glacial pothole) lake. (he didn't realize the need for a permit until it was pointed out to him (halfway through construction) by the local enviromental officer (Department of Natural Resources?)

      He then discovered that no such permits were being granted, due to "possible" enviromental impact of such constructions. (for two feet of concrete brick keeping his lawn from washing into the lake?)

      Being the cussed sort, he proceeded with the project any way (partially to spite the official who told him to "go get a permit" when he knew darn well that no such permits were even being considered.)

      Charges were dropped the week before he was due in court, when he got a supena issued to a high official in the same environmental agency who ALSO has a lake home, which ALSO has a retaining wall, in order to explain "how it is that your wall is legal and my client's is not"

      In short: go with the dock/floating idea: something that you can remove (even if only temporarily) in order to assuage the feelings of a petty bureaucrat.

    24. Re:Township Approval by gristlebud · · Score: 1

      Wrong, dipshit. If you live in Texas, surface water is public property. If you live adjacent to flowing water, you can divert enough water to irrigate lawns and gardens, as well as a limited amount for livestock. Crop watering is not covered, and must be permitted by the TCEQ. The "right of capture" refers to groundwater.

      "befire" you start spouting off about the laws where you live, you should understand what those laws are.

      --
      OK...
      I can do this. I am, after all,
      a superhero!
    25. Re:Township Approval by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      With a three inch pipe on an almost flat section of the river he'll be lucky to produce enough power to light a flashlight.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    26. Re:Township Approval by einstein · · Score: 1

      Bingo, that's the problem with everyone saying "ah, just put a pipe in the river. I have no where to pipe to..

    27. Re:Township Approval by einstein · · Score: 1

      this is kind of what I'd like to do.. but I'm just not sure of the engineering needed to stick this under my dock.

    28. Re:Township Approval by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > What if he doesn't live in a township

      I don't think that's possible. I think all the counties where the Susquehanna
      flows are subdivided into townships.

      > and owns the river himself?

      That would be a pretty neat trick. Not only does owning a river mean you
      have to own all the land on both sides of all the tributaries all the way
      up to the headwaters, but this is the Susquehanna we're talking about.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    29. Re:Township Approval by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > just put the freakin' generator on the river, shut your mouth about it and
      > wait for someone to tell you to stop.

      On the Susquehanna? I'm pretty sure you'd be noticed in notime flat.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    30. Re:Township Approval by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      hey dipshit. I live in texas, you dipshit. what do you think the parent post was about, you dipshit? water on the ground, dipshit.

      if I live adjacent to flowing water, I can divert as much as I want, you dipshit. your own link points it out, dipshit.

      "Water flowing in Texas creeks, rivers, and bays is state water. This surface water is public property; however, the state confers on individuals and organizations the right to pump water from a stream, creek, pond, or lake or to impound water in a lake or pond."

      what a dipshit. can't even bother to check his own fucking links.

      you claimed that all states are like this. ok, dipshit, look up each and every state law and post it here.

      btw, you really broke my heart with your pathetic attempt to make me look bad with my one typo. boo hoo hoo. what a fucking noob dipshit, you are.

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    31. Re:Township Approval by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure you'd be noticed in notime flat.

      What makes you say that? I hate to be the first one to give you a geography lesson but the river does not roam through major metropolitan areas.

      Perhaps you are not from the country or you would realize how darn much you can get away with without a) Some government idiot noticing or b) Some busybody neighbor wondering what you are doing.

      Perhaps you have more local knowledge of the Susquehanna than I have but in my travels of the east coast, I don't see alot of people living on or near the river. Maybe Harrisburg but it mostly wanders through small-town Pa.

    32. Re:Township Approval by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > the river does not roam through major metropolitan areas.

      No, of course not. (Are there major metropolitan areas in Pennsylvania?
      Hmmm... I can think of two; not sure whether the river in question visits
      either of them.) But small-town and country people get around quite a bit,
      and a major river is a big deal, something people pay attention to and notice.
      At any given time you may not see any people, but if you park your truck next
      to the river and sit around for a few hours watching, you'll see people.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    33. Re:Township Approval by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about their behavior but do you suppose the eco-folks spend their time looking for things like home-made generators on rivers?

  10. Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've noticed while wearing socks and walking on carpet, I often generate static electricity. Is there any way to harness this electricity to power my home, rather than shock me when I touch metal objects? In a related question, could I somehow generate power by rubbing balloons against my hair?

    1. Re:Dear Slashdot by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes! First, get some spectacularly fuzzy socks. Then, wire every one of your door knobs into a giant capacitor, and have that trickle into a battery.

    2. Re:Dear Slashdot by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that John Galt's invention in Atlas Shrugged?

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be able to harness it for personal pleasure, if you use something other than your finger to transmit the shock.

    4. Re:Dear Slashdot by Mantorp · · Score: 2, Troll

      Who is John Galt?

    5. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us are Bald you Insensitive clod.

    6. Re:Dear Slashdot by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      Yes you could, but it wouldn't be worth it, OTOH I recently heard about a new experimental house where every effort you made generated electricity (ie the door hinges were linked to dynamos, the carpet was made of coils in a magnetic field etc) sounded promessing :)

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    7. Re:Dear Slashdot by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      The performance artist Stelarc once hired scientists to work out whether it was possible to generate electricity by using the windtunnel in the throat... He was actually going to have a fan installed in his windpipe to use as wind power. Turned out it would have taken about 600 years of breathing to power a 9-volt battery....

    8. Re:Dear Slashdot by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Hrm... I'm not an electrician, but I pretend to be. Regardless, I'm pretty sure that using that method you will one day touch a knob without having enough potential and explode yourself.

      P.S. I get that the parent was a joke, just thought I'd throw in a disclaimer since somebody seems to have modded it interesting.

    9. Re:Dear Slashdot by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      You could fix some wires to your hand and attach those to a generator.. then rubbing ballons against your hair would generate electricity! (Note: you could even substitute balloon rubbing with something more fun-rubbing..)
      *Erhmm.. it's late..*

      --
      Store with salt
    10. Re:Dear Slashdot by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      I am no electrician either, thank you for your warning. I was assuming that people would put resistors on their doorknobs. Where else would you hear this last sentence but Slashdot!

    11. Re:Dear Slashdot by klaasvakie · · Score: 1

      >I was assuming that people would put resistors
      >on their doorknobs.

      Actually a resistor would not allow you to charge the cap very well, you would lose a lot of the energy in the resistor. You want to put in a diode. The diode will allow current to flow from you to the cap but not the other way around. like so:

      You--doornob--->|---cap

      That thingy between the doornob and the cap is supposed to look like a diode that blocks current from the cap.

      --
      # ssh -l neo the_matrix; killall -9 agent_smith
  11. High torque by 680x0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bet you could build a low-speed, high-torque paddle wheel (it would need to have a lot of surface area being pushed on by the river). Then, using gear ratios, you can convert that to high-speed, low-torque that may be needed by your generator. Not being a mechanical engineer, I'll leave it at that. :-)

    1. Re:High torque by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Submerged wheels are less efficient than wheels powered by falling water, which is something to look into if you live on a rough sort of incline. You could run a sluice to a smaller wheel for the same amount of power if you have a small decline on your water frontage. (Or you could dam the river, ha ha).

      A big wheel could run afoul of your winter time ice floes...A nice sized chunk of ice could wreck your system.

      A full underwater system (i.e turbines) would look better, and would probably be safe from ice. Turbines are much more expensive though.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:High torque by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Precisely. One of my most treasured books is a little volume I found at a garage sale, entitled "Principles of Mechanism." It's a detailed look at mechanically distributed power systems used in factories circa 1850. The book primarily focuses on how to convert waterwheel power via gear systems. Most factories had one huge low speed high torque paddle wheel, with one huge driveshaft. Rubberized cloth belts from the main shaft drive each floor's secondary driveshaft. The secondary driveshafts used further belts, gears, etc. to drive each individual machine. This is a wonderful system if you have to distribute rotary power to a whole factory full of lathes, looms, etc, but obviously it's a lost art today. One of my favorite illustrations in the book is an full page etching of a man standing beside a set of gears that are about 100ft in diameter.
      Anyway, it should be obvious you can gear down a slow waterwheel to provide higher speed rotations sufficient to drive any modern generator. That's probably easier than finding a generator that provides sufficient juice at low rotations.

    3. Re:High torque by Chagrin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Any sort of gearing or belt system robs power from your generator. Direct-drive whenever possible.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    4. Re:High torque by sakusha · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's freaking brilliant. I'm sure the massive gear and belt-driven factories that were the peak technology of the Industrial Revolution were designed by engineers that constantly thought to themselves, "what a disaster, I'm wasting 20% of this FREE ENERGY."

      Sheesh.

    5. Re:High torque by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and brush your teeth at least twice daily.

    6. Re:High torque by gvozd · · Score: 1

      That book sounds interesting. Who's the author, and what is the publication date?

    7. Re:High torque by sakusha · · Score: 1

      I would have to dig through storage boxes to find it, it's deeply buried so unfortunately I don't have a full citation handy, but I guarantee you the title I cited is accurate. It appears to be a college textbook, most likely grad school since the book is pretty heavy on calculus at times (I had no idea it took calculus to design gears). The book is about 150 years old so it's going to be pretty hard to find. I'm sure there are similar books in any older library.
      I initially grabbed this book because I was doing some animations of gears and I wanted them to look authentic. I was surprised to learn about the intense engineering that goes into the tiniest details of gears, even the shape of the teeth is a work of engineering art. But the coolest things I learned from the book were about gear ratios. With the book's help, I invented some really great animation shortcuts, like if I want to animate two gears with a 2:3 ratio, if I pick just the right number of gear teeth, I can just animate the first 1/3 of the primary gear rotation and just loop it three times to make a complete cycle. That saves a LOT of rendering time. But if you pick the wrong number of teeth, the gear teeth don't return to the same position at 1/3 through the cycle, or at any convenient divisor of the cycle, and you can't loop it due to the discontinuity, you have to render the whole cycle. That costs a LOT of render time.

    8. Re:High torque by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      But the EPA can bust you if your generator is not visible. This river flows into the cheaspeake bay. Its heavily monitored by the EPA and state environmental agencies. Hiding this under a dock would be perfect.

      Less efficient yes but at least you wont be fined.

    9. Re:High torque by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      If he can sell it back to the grid, then 20% waste is 20% less return on investment.

      Efficiency is not something to be ignored. Ever.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    10. Re:High torque by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what's the ROI on "doesn't work"? Without sufficient speed, he can't generate sufficient electricity.

      Also, all he needs is a few decent bicycle parts. When your investment is small, you don't need to worry about efficiency so much. And if he really cared about the money, it would likely be much more cost effective to take the 20% efficiency hit and build multiple geared-down units than to build a sluiceway or waterfall or something to try and get the water's kinetic or potential energy increased (over the short horizontal distance in which he can harness it).

    11. Re:High torque by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Yes, efficiency can easily be ignored. You're forgetting the old "80/20" rule, which states something to the effect that "the final 20% of the job takes 80% of the effort." Or in this case, 80% of the expense. If being 100% efficient requires a considerably higher expense in generators and transmission, the project may never have a positive return on investment. And besides, when did you EVER see something that was 100% efficient? There's a good reason for that (see above). Even nuclear reactors aren't 100% efficient.

    12. Re:High torque by Chagrin · · Score: 1

      That is fucking arrogant. I was replying to the comment that suggested that it seemed "obvious" that power from a slow speed river could be harnessed by simply gearing up the system. What he's going to end up with is a bunch of water that just flows around his paddles because he'll never be able to tune his belts and gears well enough to overcome the friction in them.

      Without any head he's going to find it really difficult to get any power from that river, and whenever your brain is able to advance about 100 years you might finally realize that as well.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    13. Re:High torque by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reason nothing is 100% efficient is entropy and thermodynamics.

      But that doesn't change the fact that we should strive for the highest efficiency reasonably attainable.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  12. Wind Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The basic idea behind hydro power is that you take the potential energy of water falling a vertical distance, and convert it to electrical energy. You will have trouble with that in your area. The fact that the river is slow movign tells me that the gradient in the area is very gradual, so it will be difficult to rig up a system where the water is able to travel a vertical distance. Basically you would have to build a dam to block the flow of water so it rises on one side.

    I don't think tidal power would work unless the river level fluctuates daily (tidal generators produce power only during a level change).

    My suggestion: forget hydro power, and build a windmill!

    1. Re:Wind Power! by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Potential energy extraction is not the only possibility.
      You can also extract *kinetic* energy of the water in undershot water mills.

    2. Re:Wind Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is possible I am sure, however it is *not possible* for someone doing it on their own at home. Maybe if the person was a smart engineer/technician with the available contacts and such. But since gravity is a constant force, and the current is not constant at all, it is a very hard problem.

      This guy obviously doesn't know what he's doing. As I said before, if you don't know what "reactive power" is, you *should not* be hooking things up to the grid.

    3. Re:Wind Power! by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here's a sketch of how to build a self-contained waterfall.

    4. Re:Wind Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can only extract the potential energy by converting to kinetic first...

    5. Re:Wind Power! by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      It is possible I am sure, however it is *not possible* for someone doing it on their own at home. Maybe if the person was a smart engineer/technician with the available contacts and such. But since gravity is a constant force, and the current is not constant at all, it is a very hard problem.

      Even if you use potential energy to generate electricity, such as with a dam, the water level fluctuates, so you'll still have to deal with fluctuating energy source. Most power generators have to deal with power fluctuation.

      As I said before, if you don't know what "reactive power" is, you *should not* be hooking things up to the grid.

      You can't be serious. The title of this article reads "Off Grid Via Slow Moving River?" Nobody's been suggesting to hook it up to the grid.

    6. Re:Wind Power! by einstein · · Score: 1

      perhaps I worded the title incorrectly.. I don't want to completely disconnect from the grid.. just not be dependent on it because it craps out all the time.

  13. does this remove energy from the current? by polished+look+2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ok, say this person puts in a paddle-boat or what-not which drives a generator. Does this remove energy from the river? will the downstream hydro-electric plant have less energy?

    1. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure!

      If you put enough generators in chain, water will stop moving or will start flowing upwards :).

    2. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by GarthSweet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Without understanding hydro dynamics at all I can comfortably say that if you gain some energy from the water then yes it has either lost some kinetic energy (or some mass)

    3. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by RallyNick · · Score: 5, Informative

      yes, but just momentarily. once past your paddle, the water will be accelerated again by earth's gravitational pull, so the downstream power plant won't ever notice.

      p.s. it wouldn't notice anyway since they just store the water in the dam and let it free fall on their turbine from there. so your plant will make the water take longer to reach downstream but it'll have just as much energy once there.

    4. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by sploxx · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a difference between undershot and overshot waterwheels.

      Undershot waterwheels use primarily the kinetic energy of the water (the situation you depicted above).

      Overshot waterwheels use mainly the difference in potential energy. This is (in essence) the technology which is used in all the big dams and you can draw a lot more energy from that. But you have all the consequences - you have to create a pond, build the dam etc.

    5. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd feel comfortable assuming he's not going to convert any of the water's mass directly into energy. Still, an above poster noted that the downstream dam just stores the water in a resivor, so they won't notice the difference from this project.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      If you get energy from the river, you are taking energy from the river. That's Newton. (Energy can neither be created or destroyed)

      Granted, by the same laws, every time you jump up and down on the Earth, you're moving it. (Opposite and equal reaction)

      So yea, you're taking out energy, but this river is a pretty big river, and it may turn out that his syphoning of power may be too small to be measured in terms of the whole river.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no there will not be less energy unless this person never feeds the water back into the river. In this case (ignoring the fact that it might still end up in the reservoir via ground water), then there will just be less water in the dam. Yet I thoroughly doubt the hydro-electric plant downstream will notice. But yes it will lost energy if the water is never fed back into the river.

    8. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can we get this free energy from gravity? Isnt there a law or something that says you cant just create energy like that, it must be taken away from something else. Where does gravity get its power?

    9. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How can we get this free energy from gravity? Isnt there a law or something that says you cant just create energy like that, it must be taken away from something else. Where does gravity get its power?

      Sort of, graavity is a basic force, I think it's best to study General Relativity to get a better picture but I never got that far. Gravity doesn't get it's 'power' from anywhere - except the curvature of space time by mass maybe.

      The question you should probably be asking is where does the energy to move the water to the top of the system come from, and the answer is the sun. Solar energy causes the seas to evaporate and then it rains and the rain ends up going down the river. When the sun runs out the river will dry up/freeze. Actually as the sun will likely expand to swallow mars first the river (and the plane) will evaporate first...
    10. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by Hobbex · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nobody is taking free energy from anywhere.

      The Sun's energy was used to evaporate the water, which carried it up into the atmosphere, and then it rained down over high altitude. Water at altitude has potential energy, equal to g times the height times the mass - this is the energy that is used for hydroelectric power.

      The dam uses the potential energy difference between the water at the top of the dam, and the water at a bottom of the dam. Nothing more. When water is released at the top, this potential energy turns into kinetic energy, which is used to run generators.

      Where there is NOT a dam, this potential energy is used to accelerate the water (which is why rapids move fast, while dammed rivers don't!)

      So as long as the guy's private energy generation doesn't sink the water level behind the large dam (pretty unlikely) he isn't taking any of the energy that the hydroelectric plant uses. He is simply slowing the flow of water in his section of the river marginally.

      Finally "Where does gravity get its power?" Power is energy per second, and since gravity doesn't have any energy as such, nor does it have power. Gravity is simply a force, and by counteracting this force we can store potential energy, but that is exactly the same energy that comes back. Remember that current theory is that all matter started at the same point, so any energy that is created by objects in the universe falling towards one another is really just the return of the energy once used to pull them apart. If you are asking where the gravity get its force, well, that is a deeper question for which we would have to leave 7th grade physics.

    11. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      The sun causes water to evaporate and rain on the mountains. Thus the sun stores potential energy in the water by raising it. The water normally dissapates this energy as heat and gurgling noises when it falls back to the oceans, but by putting a turbine in the way, we can get it to release this energy in a more useful form: electricity. The energy comes from the sun, the gravity just helps store it.

    12. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by FrankDrebin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      yes, but just momentarily

      Huh? Let's not forget the law of conservation of energy. Of course a waterwheel/generator takes energy from the river as it puts out electrical energy. There is nothing "momentary" about it.

      But this energy is otherwise "lost" to heat as the water flows downstream anyway. IIRC it was Joule (whose energy scale we use today) that originally did the science on waterfalls, showing the water temerature at the bottom of the falls is higher than at the top. As water flows downhill, it pummels into itself, and the gravitation potenital energy is converted to heat.

      A waterwheel simply takes some of this energy and converts it to rotation instead of heat. With a waterwheel in place, the temperature of the water will be ever-so-slightly cooler downstream.

      The downstream reservoir has a level, and it is the difference between this elevation and the tailrace (water exit) elevation that determines the amount of energy the hydro plant can extract. The difference is called "head" (I kid you not).

      So the energy of the water used by a waterwheel is not "stolen" from the downstream plant... because it would have already been "lost" to heat as it reached the reservoir anyway.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    13. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      Since the water is not in free fall, it has a terminal velocity. That's not terribly fast. Almost all of the energy not extracted by off grid hydro power and well intentioned paddle-boaters will be dissipated as heat before it gets to anyone downstream.

      The effect might, might be measureable, but it would take some very expensive equipment to do it.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    14. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by RallyNick · · Score: 1

      "momentarily" really refered to kinetic energy, which is what you'd be using to spin up a small turbnie/wheel/etc. but yeah, kinetic+potential energy decreases slowly as water goes downhil.

    15. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      If you are asking where the gravity get its force, well, that is a deeper question for which we would have to leave 7th grade physics.

      I thought that was the fundamental question in physics today; the Grand Unified Theory is supposed to explain exactly how gravity works, is it not?

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  14. hydroelectric power by gordona · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'll probably have to divert some water through a small sluice, but you'll have to find out if you legally can do this. You can emphasize that it will be 100% conservative, ie., no water will be consumed. A turbine in the sluice can be geared to drive an generator at higher speed. Will no doubt have to play with the size of the sluice and the gearing etc, since you will have essentially no head to play with.

    --
    "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" -- Dr. Strangelove
  15. I was going to suggest photovotaics as well by miracle69 · · Score: 0, Funny

    But then I saw that you were in England

    Have you considered gas powered generators at all? They're likely to be cheaper, easier to maintain, more powerful, and reliable.

    What are your electricity needs?

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    1. Re:I was going to suggest photovotaics as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you're stupid.

    2. Re:I was going to suggest photovotaics as well by abrotman · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out there is a susquehanna river that runs through the center of Pennsylvania. With an East and North branch. i believe it enters the atlantic into the chesapeke bay.

    3. Re:I was going to suggest photovotaics as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try clicking the link in the grandparent's post. The map linked to clearly shows that along with many cities labeled that happen to share names with cities in England...

  16. Wind Power by Denix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not an expert on this but I believe you would also get wind off the river. So you could combine water turbines and windmills.

    --
    "Simple words such as 'better' or 'faster' are best used by simpletons. Life [...] is more complicated." - TMC
    1. Re:Wind Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not an expert on this either, but perhaps we could harness the kinetic energy your mom produces when she blows me.

  17. Too expensive by durp · · Score: 0

    For all practical purposes I would say this is far too expensive. Where do you live?

  18. Water wheel at mill stream by jhines · · Score: 1

    Traditionally, the old grain mills used a big water wheel, which turned at a low rpm, to drive the mill stones.

    An undershot wheel, where the water goes under the wheel would work, if you can force the water under, and not around it.

    From there, simple gearing will give you what ever speed you need.

  19. Why not just.... by gleekmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not just use humans? Just make a computer based reality world to keep them happy, and harness the energy.

    1. Re:Why not just.... by ActiveSX · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no. Didn't you listen? You make a computer based reality to keep them miserable, not happy. Otherwise they won't believe it's real.

    2. Re:Why not just.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      No, no. Didn't you listen? You make a computer based reality to keep them miserable, not happy. Otherwise they won't believe it's real. In SOVIET RUSSIA, bad joke perpetuates YOU!

      Shouldn't you have summarized this "In the Soviet Matrix, Games Play You?"

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:Why not just.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this during off-peak hours when they aren't pulling a rickshaw? (Seinfeld)

    4. Re:Why not just.... by runlvl0 · · Score: 1


      You make a computer based reality to keep them miserable, not happy.

      Well, that explains Enter the Matrix. (And Matrix Revolutions, now that I think of it.)

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
  20. Do Some Homework by klausner · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a huge amount of material from the 19th century on mill design, and how to get the most out of river power. Try doing some research in a major library.

    1. Re:Do Some Homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, stop wasting everyones time with something you may not even do. do something, then ask questions if you have a problem.

    2. Re:Do Some Homework by hexx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or you could simply visit Whitemill...

  21. John Ashcroft by EventHorizon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We need government approval to think? Damn. That's worse than 198

    [MESSAGE CENSORED FOR YOUR PROTECTION]

    1. Re:John Ashcroft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, the nitwit mods are out in force today. Must be a religious thing? Do good xtian /.ers stay home and penintently mismoderate for easter?

  22. Govt Regulations by codepunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    You may need to rethink that idea if you have any sort of state regulations like we do here in Wisconsin. Here you cannot make any sort of man made diversion, dam etc without drawing a serious amount of heat. It is quite likely you will run into the same sort of problems where you live as well.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Govt Regulations by fmita · · Score: 1

      Well that's good. you could build a dam, and then use this "heat" you speak of to power a turbine, and voila! power!

    2. Re:Govt Regulations by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but no one has yet found a way to convert bureaucratic innefficiency to useful power.

  23. Height differential? by ramk13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You either need water moving at a good velocity (kinetic) or some sort of height difference (potential) to generate a reasonable amount of power. (assuming you don't want a enormous paddle) I doubt you'll be able to dam the river in any way yourself without getting some sort of permit, because dams can have serious environmental impacts.

  24. A Waterwheel by supradave · · Score: 1

    The only method would be to build a flume and a waterwheel. Start the flume high up-river and then direct it to a waterwheel. That would give you enough flow to get the waterwheel turning.

    Of course, I don't see why couldn't just make a waterwheel that could lift enough water to keep it turning without any additional water.

  25. Maybe where you live.. by itomato · · Score: 2, Informative

    In some places, as long as you don't completely block the flow, just about anything goes. It may be inconsiderate, but if it is, then you've got more than a few neighbors downstream to contend with when they find out it's you!

    Common sense, fairness, and respect go a long way in the country. That's why it rules so fucking much!

  26. Permits? by pherris · · Score: 4, Interesting
    While it does sound like an interesting idea I suspect that the county and/or commonwealth will want you to pull somekind of permit. After they stall you for a year or two just to come up with the regulations they most likely want engineering data concerning possible damage to the riverbed and the generator's effect on river currents. Of course this really makes no sense but local politics never did.

    Years ago my family spent a few years trying to get a 30' fix pier (that others on our street could use for free) built by our property. Between the hassles of the town, state and MEPA we gave up. Strangely a few years later a neighbor (and state senator) who opposed to our project build his own from our prints 100' away. I guess we didn't grease the right gears.

    My advice, make it small, discrete, quite and easily removable. Be forward that running your own generator over a long period is probable cause for the DEA to search your house as a suspected grow-op. It sounds crazy but again it's all about politics.

    Bonne Chance.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:Permits? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Be forward that running your own generator over a long period is probable cause for the DEA to search your house as a suspected grow-op.


      What's the connection between generating your own power and growing your own drugs?
    2. Re:Permits? by OgGreeb · · Score: 1

      It would seem the best way to build something like this would be to run for public office. Aim high enough and the government will build it for you. Run for national office and lobbyists will throw money at you at the same time.

      --
      -- Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW 301/249-6501 AIM:OgGreeb Digital Marketing Inc., Bowie, MD //www.digimark.net/
    3. Re:Permits? by dnixon112 · · Score: 1

      Growing marijuana hydroponically consumes large amounts of electricity.

    4. Re:Permits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Growing plants indoors requires high powered lights that can really run up an electrical bill. There are also various other electronics involved for ventilation and, optionally, for automating the watering/fertilizing process. A sufficiently large electrical bill in conjunction with other "suspicious" activites can be used by the authorities to obtain a search warrant (google electrical bill warrant for some examples). PG&E, for example, routinely hands over unusual electrical bills to the police without being asked (why do they want their best customers arrested?). To avoid this, many growers will either tamper with their meters or run generators. So, generating your own power puts you under suspicion as well.

  27. I forget the name of it now.... by zogger · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... but there exists a tow-behind your sailboat generator I have seen. Looks like a dinky torpedo that is trailed behind, the little props spin, you get juice. It would do what you are looking for, easy to install, some power. Legalities of tying it directly to some point out in the stream-no idea, plus the safety factor of someone smacking into it.

    found it

    http://www.salt-systems.com/marine-wind.htm

    with that said, unless a stream goes entirely through your property, ie you can control both sides of the bank and build a proper dam etc, which is a ton of hassle and permits and whatnot usually, I would recommend doing the normal tried and true approach of wind/solar/fuel genny hybrid as an adjunct to your grid power. Re arrange where you put your money into first which of the first two works better for your locale. You usually want all four for true backup solution in most places. that is a generalization, but mostly true. It's really a variable, it has to be customized to your location and needs. Site survey maps exist on the web that will show mean average sun shiney hours and mean average winds for your area that will help you make a determination of which method gets priority. the reason why the "hybrid" approach is so good is that usually most places in the US get a lot of wind in the winter, but less wind but more sun in the summer. but that just depends, some places it's so windy all the time wind alone with the fuel genny backup is good, other places solar is better,etc--just depends..

    me = grid, some solar, backup aero-marine wind genny, two fuel gennys

    good luck! Once you get your rig up and working, you'll ask yourself "why the heck didn't I do this years ago?" It's really comforting knowing you always have SOME power no matter what, and even better to OWN it.

    1. Re:I forget the name of it now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about finding some native beaver and befriending them.

      They will build the dam built with none of the hastle of doing it yourself.

  28. how do you sync to the grid? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Let me ask a follow-up question to this. If one were to generate power this way and stay on the grid to try to feed back power and mak some income (as well as have power if your system greaks down), how do you keep your river driven system in sync with the 60 cycle grid (which obviously must be done if you plan on feeding the frid)?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:how do you sync to the grid? by MrChuck · · Score: 1
      An inverter/controller?
      The same way you generate (and feed power onto the grid) from ANY AC (alternator created) source like windmills and most other none Solar/PV sources (which make DC and are inverted into AC and fed onto the grid all over the place).

    2. Re:how do you sync to the grid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use a synchronous generator! It is self-synchronizing to the grid. However, since this is the case, sometimes the grid will need to supply you with power if you start drifting. It is not so simple.

      I suggest: if you don't know what "reactive power" is, you *should not* be hooking things up to the grid. Hire an engineer to do it all for you.

    3. Re:how do you sync to the grid? by !3ren · · Score: 1

      Convert to DC, feed through an voltage controlled oscillator with a phase-locked loop and an amplifier. tada

    4. Re:how do you sync to the grid? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Make sure that the generator is a synchronus machine, then it will automatically sync to the grid. Just make sure that the river isn't running too slowly, or the generator will turn in to a motor and start sucking out juice to make the river go faster.

      And make sure that the machine is perfectly in phase when connected to the grid. Even small machines can jump long way if they're connected when they're out of phase.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:how do you sync to the grid? by stiller · · Score: 1

      how do you keep your river driven system in sync with the 60 cycle grid

      The same way they adjust nuclear reactor cores to have the steam generators rotate at 60 cycles?

  29. what about a fish-like device by polished+look+2 · · Score: 1

    what about building some kind of water-wing that, when placed in the water, oscillates from low position in the water to high position in the water - then somehow pull energy in off of that.

    1. Re:what about a fish-like device by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      They are using something like this off the coast of Scotland. It was on the BBC website yesterday.

      In a river, the easy way to extract the energy would be to arrange for the wing (I personally call this a "whale tail") to operate a pneumatic ram (like the hydaulic one from a back hoe) and pump into a reservoir cylinder via a non-return valve. Then use an air motor to drive a generator. A simple mechanical arangement forms a flip-flop to toggle the wing angle up and down. (45deg up. When it hits the bottom, it flips to 45deg down, when it hits the top, it flips again). Speed determined by the air pressure and water speed. No need to regulate it. (Make sure you have an adequate safely valve :-)

      A fair junk-yard challenge, but if the energy is there, then >10kW is easy engineering, and reliability no problem.

      I would expect far greater energy from simpler engienering in an unconfined space. Water wheels require the water to be confined to a narrow channel, which is expensive and a legal nightmare.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  30. I'm surprised nobody suggested this by unixwin · · Score: 2, Funny



    well here goes -- move

    --
    -- everyones not everybody and neither is everybody like everyone.
    1. Re:I'm surprised nobody suggested this by tepples · · Score: 1

      In this tight job market?

  31. Is your land hilly? by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One thing that you can do is use a small hydraluc ram to move water up a hill. Once in a small, resivoir you then allow gravity to do its work. Nice thing about this approach, is that if you use a big enough pipe/ram, you can pump up enough water for using on other projects such as irrigation or a simple open flowing water stream.

    And for many here, the ram does not use electricity.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Is your land hilly? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1


      Windbourne, in this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

    2. Re:Is your land hilly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm stupid, so please explain. How does the ram move water uphill, and where does that energy come from?

    3. Re:Is your land hilly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How does his suggestion violate this law?


      Since the Susquehena is an external energy
      source, with tons of input kinetic energy
      entering the closed-system (the only way to
      properly judge a thermodynamic system according
      to these laws), I think his argument has merit.

    4. Re:Is your land hilly? by kaptkudzoo · · Score: 1

      it uses the energy of a large amount of water falling a small distance to move a small amount of water a great distance

    5. Re:Is your land hilly? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      The ram will use x gallons (say 10) of moving water to move a much smaller amount up a hill. Physical laws must be obeyed (in contrast to many of our human laws :) ), but it does works. Try Google.

      Ignorance != stupid. The fact that you knew that you did not know and sought an answer rather than try a smart-a** comment says that you are not stupid. The only reason why I know about is a book that I read when I was in grade school (I like sciences back then).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Is your land hilly? by darkith · · Score: 1

      Actually, ram pumps do obey thermodynamics.

      http://www.animatedsoftware.com/pumpglos/ram_pum p. htm
      http://www.i4at.org/lib2/hydrpump.htm

      The energy from most of the water is used to pump 10-25% of the water up to a resevoir. Quite common for reliable (low part count) and powerless systems, such as moving water into a storage tank/resevoir for cattle or crop irrigation.

      You need some amount of head for a ram pump, so I suspect it would be more efficient to use that head to drive a generator, than to use it to pump water up to a resevoir, and then drive a generator from that...unless your generator operates better on low-flow, high-head than it does on high-flow, low-head.

    7. Re:Is your land hilly? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      To operate a generator in low-flow, I think that you need quantity of blades (i.e. you will have a paddle wheel approach or a large flexible propellor). A ram can operate on a much lower head and is smaller profile. Nice thing is that it transforms a small amount of water to a higher quality (high head/high flow) source so that you can use a small profile generator. Besides, if you set this up, then you can get your own flowing stream with water fall, etc. Nice effect for the property. But of course this all depends on having some amount of head across the property.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:Is your land hilly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you find the earlier postings difficult to understand, Why not try How stuff works. It will give the answer in a simple, easy to understand answer.

    9. Re:Is your land hilly? by darkith · · Score: 1

      That would be high head, *low* flow. Given 100 units of flow, you may be able to pump 15 units into your reservoir. The aforementioned law of thermodynamics limits it to a trade off of flow versus head, with *no* increases in energy. At best, it's a transfer to a more desirable form (e.g. flow -> head) with energy lost to friction, efficiency.

      Like I said, this would be an advantage if the only available generator required high flow. With the exception of *extremely* low head situations, a low flow generator using all 100 units would provide the most energy, avoiding the efficiency losses from the extra step of converting high flow to high head.

    10. Re:Is your land hilly? by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      The water flowing by operates a pump that lifts some other water up into a storage tank. The electricity is generated by having the water in the storage tank fall and turn a wheel (like a typical waterwheel). In other words, you're using the kinetic energy in the flowing water to store potential energy in the water in the storage tank. You use that stored pot.eng. to create electricity.

      This is much less efficient than a waterfall or typical waterwheel, but is useful when you have slow-moving water that can't turn a wheel fast enough to generate electricity. It might take 10 gallons of flowing water to get 1 gallon up into the tank, but at least you get to use that 1 gallon instead of 0.

  32. Uh, not too many Native American rivers in England by spineboy · · Score: 1

    The Susquehanna river is located in the Eastern USA, namely Pennsylvania, and it might also start in NY and end up in Delaware and Maryland. (New)Jersey may even see part of it.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  33. The Standard Way to Do This... by nightwing2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Which is also unobtrusive, is a turbine that looks like a jet engine. A tube with a series of fans inside; if the current is decently fast, it will turn enough to create electricity. If the current is not fast enough, then you don't get eanything.

    Unfortunately, making a long-term sealed generator and submersible it is probably not a home project. I suppose it also depends on what sort of stuff coming down the river might eventually plug the rotors. But at least it would be submerged and hidden. As long as it does not impact river navigability (and you don't chew up a few swimmers with the blades, ha ha) who's going to notice and complain?

    If you don't actually have a drop, the usual waterwheel, dam, etc. solutions won't work. You could try that Roman trick, if you are allowed to moor a barge in the river; put a big paddlewheel in the barge; hook it to a bunch of auto alternators, and get some power inverters?

    If you had the paddlewheels mounted in the center of the barge and enclosed in an insulated deckhouse and turning all the time, probably (?) they would not freeze. (Just HOW cold does it get there? Flowing water, of course is never below zero...)

  34. Old Mother Earth News backissues.. by itomato · · Score: 1

    Check your local library's collection of 70's Back-to-the-land books. I know there are some principles laid out in one or more of the Foxfire books. A good book if you can find it is called "Making Do". There are great diagrams in there for elegant and simple, lo-tech solutions to issues like hydro-power, cooking, etc.

    Mother's run dozens of articles on the subject through the years. Do they have a CDROM/DVD archive yet, anybody? That would friggin rock..

  35. submerible generator by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative

    Real Goods catalog sells a generator that looks like a boat trolling motor or a minisub thruster, only with a bigger propeller. You anchor it in the river, and it uses the large volume of water flowing past it. I believe the river still needs to be moving at several feet per second, and has to be at least 2 feet deep- we're not talking mountain stream here. Needs to be a -river-.

    The other way is to lay pipe along the river for quite some distance, to as low a point as possible. You need quite a bit of "head"(vertical delta) or a lot of waterflow; Real Goods' other generator system uses a turbine, with a customizable configuration of nozzles.

    As for selling electricity back to the grid (aka intertie systems)- you can't always do that(ie, "sell" the electricity back), and even if you can, there are often limits on how much electricity can be generated. The power companies also get pretty pissy about people powering the grid, because if there's an outage, and a lineman goes to work on the lines he thinks are dead...well...fried lineman. Most inverters these days designed for intertie(which is what we're talking about) have safety features to prevent it from powering a grid by itself, but power companies still like to make excuses and may demand one of their engineers check out the system(at your cost of course).

    1. Re:submerible generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Susquehanna is a river - it has major power-generating dams on it. Depth is typically in excess of 15 feet, and it is used for local drift diving (current) training for scuba divers.

      That said, the key word you should be googling for it "microhydro". You still need some current or some elevation drop to run a turbine. Paddle wheels and such (what the engineering and physics ignorant slashdot crowd are recommending) generate far too little power to run a lightbulb unless absolutely enormous. If you can get a yard or more of elevation drop, run a 4 inch or wider pipe upriver as high as you can afford. Anchor it below water in concrete block (open to water, but always under water). This is your intake. Have it spill out as far downriver as practical, where your generator will be. Now hook a high efficiency generator (type, turbine, etc depending on volume and water pressure obtained). Pelton wheels, turgos, etc to convert the pressurized water stream to mechanical rotation, and a generator (DC, usually better) or alternator (AC, cheaper) to generate electricity. Each component has a differet powerband, so you need to know how much pressure and water you have, and then put the appropriate components together to maximize the amount of energy you extract. With the Susquehanna, you have virtually unlimited amounts of water, so that's not your limit. Diverting 10% of it though into your power generator might draw attention, so run-of-the-river generation might be preferable, even if less efficient. The Susquehanna is fairly slow moving at some times of the year though, and might be below the threshold when run-of-the-river generation works.

  36. MOD PARENT UP!!! PLEASE by spineboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    just ignore me.. THe parent has some good insight. Why bother to reinvent the wheel, there is a reason that many people used water powered wheels on slow moving rivers.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  37. Getting energy from the river. Some ideas by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sneak out and clamp 12 to 120 volt convertors on passing motorboats, with wires going back to your house. The wires had better be long

    Stand on the shore with a big shotgun, and demand that passersby pay you a toll in killowatt hours in order to pass.

    Provide all the catfish with treadmills connected to generators.

    Per Max Screck of Batman 2, set up your own power plant and connect to the nearby hydro plants. Provide a lot of paperwork that no one reads, that includes the part that says that your power plant actually drains power from the grid instead of adding to it.

    Power hot air turbines from meetings of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

    If all else fails, I'm sure that the orgone writings of Reich, the magic energy fields of Tesla, or the spoonbending force of Uri Gellar will give you an answer.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  38. The easy way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of generating electricity use to water to bathe in. Once you have developed a stronger immune system you can move on to using the river for drinking water. Just leave the lights on

  39. Is there an elevation change involved? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 3, Informative
    If your relying strictly on the flow of the water (no gravitational potential energy due to elecation changes) you can measure the speed of the river flow get some idea how much head pressure the river can deliver. If it's a slow moving river (as you said in the header of the post) there may not be a lot of pressure head to deal with (which would imply a large volume of water to generate significant current).

  40. Start with conservation by danharan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, almost any solution will cost more than conservation. Not only can you have a smaller generator, but you won't need as many batteries to store energy for peak periods.

    Check out real goods and other suppliers. Good lighting, gas-powered hot water heaters, fridges and cooking... there are lots of nice appliances that can reduce your reliance on electricity.

    As for generation- keep your options open. It may not be legal for you to install a micro-hydro generator, and solar or wind might be cheaper.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    1. Re:Start with conservation by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Another thing to keep in mind is that inverters are only so efficient... I think it's around the 70% mark.

      There are tons of appliances manufactured to run off 12V, so if you keep your battery bank at that, you can wire your house for both 120V and 12V and run as much as you can off the 12V. I recommend automotive-lighter-plug-style sockets for those, as most 12V equipment is made to plug into the jacks in cars, RVs, etc.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  41. I'm suspecting... by duran.goodyear · · Score: 1

    ... there are a lot of very interesting, new ways to place impellers, and energy transferance devices into the waterflow, which, just being moved by the motion of the river, will power a turbine... ???? .... profit, er, I mean, electricity.

    the need to divert a water flow seems really really labor intensive, and also, very 19th century.

    This is /. right? theres got to be something cool in the archive about innovative hydrodynamic power systems.

    1. Re:I'm suspecting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is /. right?"

      Nooo... No its not.

  42. yes, but investigate 'net metering' by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    do they sell at the same rate they buy from? depends on the state..

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:yes, but investigate 'net metering' by pla · · Score: 3, Interesting

      do they sell at the same rate they buy from? depends on the state..

      I'd worry about that, too...

      Looking at my own electric bill, it divides almost perfectly in half, with 50% going to electric "supply", and 50% going to "distribution". So, even if they paid me the same rate they charge me, it would seem that, no matter how much I produce, I could at best break even (since presumeably I would make the money on supply, but still have to pay almost the same rate for distribution).

      I dunno. But personally, I'd stay on the grid (unless something major happened, in which case, I'd make damn sure I had an overly-dramatic Very Big Switch I could throw to disconnect me) just for the convenience factor in case something goes wrong with my own production system (generator breaks, stream dries up, whatever).


      As an aside, though, I still consider wind the way to go (though would certainly not suggest we completely skip solar, but I would consider solar more of a backup system than a primary one). With hydroelectric, you need year-round running water with a decent head. With solar, you need a fairly high-capacity storage system for the 60-80% of the day when you can't generate enough to match usage. With any sort of combustion, you need fuel. But with wind? It doesn't even really matter where you live - an 80' tower will produce a few kW just about anywhere. Aside from the "ugly" factor, including a wind turbine into the cost of every new house would reduce our current electric grid from a critical utility, to little more than a backup system. When I finally "settle down", I consider that a major point in my decision of where to buy property - If I can't have a wind turbine due to local BS laws and zoning regs, I won't live there.

    2. Re:yes, but investigate 'net metering' by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      you get disconected automatically with your inverter when line power goes down

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    3. Re:yes, but investigate 'net metering' by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looking at my own electric bill, it divides almost perfectly in half, with 50% going to electric "supply", and 50% going to "distribution". So, even if they paid me the same rate they charge me, it would seem that, no matter how much I produce, I could at best break even (since presumeably I would make the money on supply, but still have to pay almost the same rate for distribution).

      I remember reading somewhere, although I don't remember where (fuzzy memory, this), that they're required to credit you 1 kwH for each 1kwH you generate, and buy any surplus you generate. So, you get a straight 1:1 credit for your use, and then the surplus is free money at whatever rate it is. Recall that the purpose of the law is to provide a way for people to provide their own electricity without letting the power companies (notoriously anti-competitive) screw you out of doing so. Promoting a distributed power infrastructure is good. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  43. Moveon.org is not a valid source of info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Rumsfeld Lying Through His Teeth [moveon.org] "

    Of course they would say that. Moveon.org is a branch of the Democratic Party campaign apparatus. They would claim that Rumsfield is a dirty rotten scoundrel whether or not he lied: just because Rumsfeld is in the other party.

    It is like having a sig saying "Clinton is a Slick Scoundrel [rushlimbaugh.com]." That someone says bad things about their foe like this is neither newsworthy or proufound.

    1. Re:Moveon.org is not a valid source of info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They would claim that Rumsfield is a dirty rotten scoundrel whether or not he lied: just because Rumsfeld is in the other party.

      Of course, you could just watch the piece and judge for yourself whether the allegation is true. It wouldn't take much more time than it took for you to compose your "must ignore 'cause it comes from Democrats" post.

    2. Re:Moveon.org is not a valid source of info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did. It was the typical out of context falsehood used in campaign ads.

      Eventually, you will grow up and realize that campaign ads are not sources of news. You could use the same sort of tactics "moveon.org" does and produce a video showing how John Kerry loves to stomp newborn kittens (Attn: GW Bush Campaign: if you are reading this, don't get any ideas).

  44. Jack Rabbit by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 1

    This thing is the only applicable product that I've ever seen.

    --
    Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
  45. My father had a book on this stuff by panurge · · Score: 5, Informative
    It was obviously written for settlers in the early 20th century and had all kinds of stuff on the different types of paddlewheels for different applications. By the sound of it you would need an undershot wheel with large buckets, unfortunately far from unobtrusive. Noise could be a major problem unless you used sucessive belt step-up drives rather than gearing, but the basic setup would need to resemble an automotive alternator system, which can produce a fairly constant output power despite fluctuations in rpm.

    However, there would be many potential problems, especially the difficulty and cost of fixing a large overhung wheel with an asymmetric load over a river with fluctuating height (the wheel axis is going to need to rise and fall) and the regulatory problems: I guess you would need a license and it might be hard to obtain.

    Another solution might be a hydraulic ram. There is the remains of one near where I live, that could raise water nearly 200ft. without an external power source, and was very simple and reliable. I guess some sort of license would be needed, but they are unobtrusive- there is nothing to see above water level but the exit pipe and the compression tank. Once the water is in a storage tank at high level, it can power a conventional turbine or an overshot wheel (more efficient than undershot), and the output can be adjusted to give fairly constant generator rpm regardless of load. Hydraulic rams can be noisy.

    However, I wouldn't recommend going down either of these routes unless you are a qualified mechanical or civil (structural) engineer or both, and have good contacts in other disciplines.

    The smallest hydro generator I have seen working, by the way, is at the end of the River Lyn in England. It's way bigger than you are likely to want ( I think I recall it's about 100KW) but when I was there in the early 90s it was still working. It attracts a lot of visitors from the US, and the whole place (including the water powered gravity railway) is a wonderful example of English quaintness.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  46. Re:Legal ? by gleekmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How is it more 'irresponable' to use water as a source of energy rather than wind or sunlight? I wasn't under the impression that waterwheels were perticularly damaging to the environment.

    On the positive side, if everyone by a river did build one of these things, there would be less need for coal powerplants - THOSE are destructive to the environment.

  47. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. You're an idiot.

    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said! Furthermore, I agree.

  48. Re:Uh, not too many Native American rivers in Engl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even bother clicking the link in the grandparent's post? The map linked to clearly shows that along with many cities labeled that happen to share names with cities in England...

  49. Mother archive by itomato · · Score: 1

    Oh yes.. Mother Earth News CDROM archive. Glee. No word on what the 2400 articles contain, though..

  50. here is the link by polished+look+2 · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:here is the link by dexter+riley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the site:
      In a 9 mph stream (slow jog) the Jack Rabbit produces about 2,400 watt-hours daily

      So, at 2.4 kilowatt-hours a day, at a cost of $0.08 (say) a kilowatt-hour, you would save over 19 cents a day on electricity, or enough to pay off the generator in 17.1 years.

      You're probably better off sinking the money into more efficient light bulbs or refrigerators.

  51. which systems by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... does he use?

    One of the weird things about enron is, they actually had at least one decent product. they made whopper wind gennys. GE bought them at fire sale prices and are still making them, last I knew. I actually tried to get some rich dudes to buy them out as soon as I heard of enrons troubles, but no see gar there sad to say. I think it's an excellent way to actually pay for a nice spread out in the country, make all your loot + pay for property + have oodles of free juice to play with. If I had the VC I'd do it/organize it, but never really tried anything that ambitious before. It gets quickly into 7 figures though for the whopper systems.

    1. Re:which systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He owns a farm in Alberta, Canada where he puts them up.

  52. Convert the river to youre needs. by NoMercy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Split the river, so next to the original you have a very very low gradient river channel, carrying the water down-stream with little loss of height, then let it out of a small channel, a lower volume of higher speed water, sutable for driving small generators, there's a old water-mill by a village near here which uses the system, wheels gone, but the jet of water is still there squirting out into the lower part of the river.

  53. check your regs first... by waytoomuchcoffee · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have Federal, State, and local regs you need to check out.

    First, Federal. The Corps of Engineers handles 404 permits. You need this to discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States - fill material includes structures as well. You might be exempt (usually if you affect under 1/10 acre you will be), but you need to make sure. If you are going to affect any Federal Endangered/Threatened species (are any in/near the river?) you will need clearance through the US Fish and Wildlife Department and or National Marine Fisheries Service. This is usually coordinated through the Section 7 process of your 404 permit, but if you DON'T qualify for a 404 permit and there are endangered species, you have to do your own Habitat Conservation Plan and prepare a document under the National Environmental Quality Act (NEPA).

    Second, State. The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission regulates fish movements. "No dams, ponds, or other devices which prevent free migration of fish shall be erected or placed by a person licensed to propagate and sell fish in a stream flowing over the person's property".
    I am sure you also have some type of dam safety office as well, if you go that route. Also, I don't know how water rights work in your state, but you need to check into that as well. You also might have a state version of NEPA (many states do).

    Third, local. Check your local Planning department for applicable rules and regs.

    1. Re:check your regs first... by Bryan_W · · Score: 3, Funny
      First, Federal. The Corps of Engineers handles 404 permits.
      Wouldn't it suck if he went there to get them but they couldn't be found?
    2. Re:check your regs first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. If he is planning something truly unobtrusive, then the very last thing he should do is whisper a word of it to anyone. The state workings will let multi-million dollar hydro dams go up, but will stop people like this guy in his tracks. If you want something to be cheap, effective, and worthwhile, NEVER INVOLVE THE STATE!

    3. Re:check your regs first... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      First, Federal. The Corps of Engineers handles 404 permits

      Aw, crap, you mean I need to get the Corps of Engineers to check for broken links in order to get my website design approved? :)

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    4. Re:check your regs first... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > You have Federal, State, and local regs you need
      > to check out.

      Don't be silly. We already know that there is no chance of him getting permission were he incautious enough to ask.

      Don't ask. Just do it.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:check your regs first... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      you will need clearance through the US Fish and Wildlife Department and or National Marine Fisheries Service

      I was going to suggest environmental concerns as well, but.. after 3 mile island, I'm not sure there are any endangered species left in that river! Check out the wiki!

    6. Re:check your regs first... by LadyLucky · · Score: 1
      First, Federal. The Corps of Engineers handles 404 permits

      I tried to find it, but I kept getting a 'Not Found' error.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    7. Re:check your regs first... by steveorama · · Score: 1


      I looked all over for a 404 permit, but I couldn't find one.

  54. Don't reinvent the (water) wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would do just as the parent says, some of this research will be invaluable. There are things which you probably haven't thought of like

    filtering: stopping debris getting in
    anti-fouling: preventing the buildup of algae and weed
    governing: stopping the wheel going too fast in a storm

    There is doubless a lot of 'lost knowledge' about - people have been doing this for hundreds of years and most likely the best solution is low tech rather than high tech.

  55. Re:Why not just.... EQ; SWG; DAOC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have all ready done that. Have you heard of Everquest? Star Wars Galaxy's? or Dark Age of Cammalot? All of those and i'm sure there are more are virtual reality that people spend alot of time doing. . . So the question is who is the genious who will figure out how to use the energy?

  56. Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an inane request. Instead of going into cardiac arrest when the power goes out, learn to live without your computer. Candles and a gas stove are cheaper than the lawyers it'd take you to get the permits to do something like this, and they cause far less ecological damage than someone who has essentially no clue would stand to cause digging around a river.

    If you have a legit reason why you need power(think dialysis machine that you'll die without, not internet you'll go into withdrawl without), some combination of your town and power company will give you a generator.

  57. I endorse this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... as it would give /. editors and -bots another useful target to tilt at.

    PS. Michael, you're a goat-pleasuring son of a one-eyed whore. Happy Easter, bitches!

  58. Re:Uh, not too many Native American rivers in Engl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The map also contains state names like New York, Pennsylvania and Maryland indicating pretty clearly that it's the United States.

  59. Two way Meters by Dark+Bard · · Score: 1

    Most companies that sell wind generators and such have equipment for generating 60 cycle AC current. Check with the power company for two way meters. They allow you flow power back into the grid and keep track of whether you are providing more than you are taking. You may not get much money per watt for what you are selling back but the big thing is you don't need battery back up. A huge savings and far less maintence. You'll need an electrician to do the hook up and sync you to the grid.

  60. Good thing(tm) by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    From the make-sure-you-have-plenty-of-candles dept.

    How very optimistic of you Michael


    -Colin

  61. This is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of the frequency, living along high-current streams and rivers may fuck with your DNA. I would suggest the use of a tinfoil field dampener if you are planning on living near any EMF generating bodies of water. Lakes and ponds are cool though.

  62. How on earth is this a troll? by fmita · · Score: 0

    Mod the parent back at least to 0, for the love of god.

  63. but how to deal with the hippos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I had a discussion about this sort of idea with the owner of a hotel I stayed at in Zambia last year (http://www.naturalmysticlodge.com) Its right on the banks of the Zambezi and we were discussing the options for making use either the solar or water power available. One of the snags with stuff like floating waterwheels tho was the local wildlife. Theres a hippo who comes by pretty much every evening to snack on the lawns, and having something that large bump your homebuilt water wheel could really mess with it.

    1. Re:but how to deal with the hippos? by urbanmatador · · Score: 0

      thing is, no hippos in the susq. river...

      --
      there can be hours between the so and the what of the so.
    2. Re:but how to deal with the hippos? by operagost · · Score: 1
      There aren't many hippos in Pennsylvania. I'm pretty sure you'll only find them here.

      All kidding aside, there aren't alligators or other large aquatics that could pose a problem either.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  64. Off Grid Living by Fortress · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would suggest that hydro power is not the best way to go for an off grid home power system. You really need high volume/high head water source to harvest any appreciable energy; from what you've described, there is no appreciable head (vertical drop) to the river near you. As well, as others have pointed out, building anything in the water entails a lot of bureaucratic red tape.

    I would say that solar or wind power is more feasible for most people. Solar is cheap in maintenance costs but expensive to set up, and you really need a lot of panel area to hope to supply your needs. Wind power is cheaper up front, but more maintenance is required because of moving parts, and noise from the rotors can be annoying.

    Either solution will require a battery bank to store power to use when the plant is not producing, plus a good inverter to supply consistent 120v 60Hz power. If all you are looking for is protection from outages, the battery bank with a generator may be ideal from a cost/benefit perspective. The payback time of most alternative energy projects is in excess of 50 years, so think carefully before you invest.

  65. Of course its bloody legal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    LOL. Of course its legal.
    Have you any idea what a waterwheel even IS.
    Its a round shaped piece of WOOD.
    At one time every mill in England was powered this way - it was only when the industrial revolution brought cheap mined coal that the environment started to go to shit.

    I think you are wondering 'how could it be legal for someone to get FREE electricity?'

    Well the strange news for city dwellers is that you can get pretty much anything Nature provides for free outside Metropolis - free clean water, free electricity, free natural gas, free fuel. You know you can even grow your own food and its LEGAL to eat it. We have a wood burning stove and guess what its LEGAL to put sticks on it, we have never had a lawsuit from the trees.

    Its kind of sad that people are so cloistered and urbanised that when someone mentions doing what man has been doing for 2000+ years you ask 'Is it Legal?' Not everything in life must be by appeal to authourity, some people just LIVE, the way they want to with what is available, most often this is a better balance with nature than an industrialisded approach and has minimal impact on the environment. You don't shit on your own doorstep in the wild.

    1. Re:Of course its bloody legal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live out in the "weeds", yet that doesn't stop many from watching all the waterways like a hawk; we have the Department of Natural Resources here quite often. Additionally, here in Michigan in the USA, most natural waterways are owned by the state, and all waterfront property "platted" after 1952(?) has a 100 year flood plain that is owned and controlled by the government; you simply cannot modify the environment without real problems; my neighbor was forced to completely fix damage he did by filling in the front of his lake lot.

      The problem is that they overlook the real important things, like the underground aquifers that keep us all alive and with clean water.
      See the "Ice Mountain"/Nestle' debate raging here about companies pumping millions of gallons to be bottled, and others that have allowed high-pressure toxic waste injection into deep wells in Romulus Michigan as well.
      How about allowing these massive CAFOs(farming factories) from dumping raw sewage into the surface drain ditches, contaminating the surface water.

      http://www.waterissweet.org/

      http://www.factoryfarm.org/resources/photos/#dai ri es

    2. Re:Of course its bloody legal. by kraut · · Score: 1

      Actually, there were quite a few WIND mills in the flatter, windy parts of the country - like Norfolk, where you can still see lots of them.

      As to "Its kind of sad that people are so cloistered and urbanised that when someone mentions doing what man has been doing for 2000+ years you ask 'Is it Legal?'" .. people have been killing people for more than 2000+ years, and it's still illegal ;)

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    3. Re:Of course its bloody legal. by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      No, No, NO, people. Not insightful. TROLL!

      God.

      Need reasons?

      You don't shit on your own doorstep in the wild.
      No, but you still have the same problem as in the city, you still shit. Thing is, when you are the only person in a hundred square miles, you don't have to shit in the same place very often. In the city, if you don't shit where and ONLY where it is LEGAL to, people get sick and die.

      I think you are wondering 'how could it be legal for someone to get FREE electricity?'

      No, they are wondering if their actions will affect anybody else. They're not the self-centered asshole that thinks it's ok to slow down the river so that sediment builds up and it screws up the shoreline and flow patters for miles downstream.

      free clean water...
      only works when the population density will support it. Try realizing that your actions have consequences, even if you don't see them.
      It's not a matter of "oh dear, should I get permission first?". It's a matter of "is what I'm doing going to screw things up for other people in ways that I don't see?" and actually giving a shit about that enough to check it out before plunging ahead. If you don't agree with that statement, then you can't logically think that we should in any way bother with thinking of other people or the future. Just to whatever the hell you want and don't even slow down to consider the consequences.

    4. Re:Of course its bloody legal. by CyBlue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you analyze the post carefully, they're not talking about a waterwheel with some stream feeding it, they're talking about a substantially large "paddle-wheel" sitting out in the river (such as the ones driving old 1800's steam ships). A waterwheel such as the ones powering a mill would require a vertical drop at least as tall as the wheel. With the river conditions he's describing, there is no such vertical drop. Being from England, you're obviously not familiar with laws regarding navigable waterways here in the US. The US Army Corps of Engineers is probably in charge of this river and therefore a huge set of rules apply to any structures built on it.

  66. You're missing the best setup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My house is right next to the Susquehanna river"

    Susquehanna hat company???

    It's on bagel street!Where's bagel street?I don't know we'll ask somebody...
    Please forgive me, this is about the only Susquehanna references that I'll see this year and somebody has to do it....Okay it's pretty f/n stupid, going to A/C this one

  67. storage by zogger · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a lot of experience maintaining a large bank of rolls/surrettes and some trojans ( and others). One, they'll last a lot longer than 5-6 years, especially is you install a desulphator on the battery bank. They *work* as advertised, I highly recommend them. I've actually rejuvenated some marginally rank batts with them. neat stuff, the gov and some industries use them a lot to, to keep starter batteries "fresh" for long unused storage conditions with vehicles that only get occassional use.

    On the batts, the rolls are definetly good, and definetly expensive, along with the crowns. I have found cost comparing, it might be useful to check out local forklift companies and get a battery bank from them. These are deep cycle "traction" batteries in steel boxes. Whoppers, and with batts, it's the lead, the size, bigger is better more or less. You can get a 12 volt bank for around 6-800$ that will hold twice (roughly) as many amp hours as the equivalent-in-money rolls batts. Plus, if you are near any big city with the foirklift dealer, you can go get the thing yourself,(heavy, be prepared for some egyptian engineering to get them in place with levers and ramps and dollies and whatnot) usually rolls batts need to be shipped in,too, kinda spensive...

    the forklift batts come 12/24/ 36 / 48 volt so you can pick your voltage requirements. Most home systems are 24 or 12 volt at the storage, depends on how far away your panels are, and how much thick expensive copper wire you want to run. You can (if you really want to) CAREFULLY cut the welded busbars on the top of the forklift batts and do your own custom series/parallel wiring as well,to get whatever voltage you want (say knocking down the 48 to a 24) but I'd recommend just sizing for your needs and purchasing appropriately.

    Good luck!

  68. Kinetic Energy problem by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Most undershot watermills would not handle a 4-6' change in operating level

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Kinetic Energy problem by sploxx · · Score: 1

      You could mount the wheel on empty canisters swimming in the river. And prevent the whole construction with ropes from swimming away :)

    2. Re:Kinetic Energy problem by irokitt · · Score: 1

      And that would make the turbine connection more difficult, right?

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  69. "minicentrale" or floating zero-head generator by caffeineboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you can get access to both sides of the river, you could try rigging up a floating power generator. They seem easier to home-brew than a turbine, and are probably accordingly less efficient.

    There is a company in britaing that specializes in this kind of generator - one application that it lends itself to is water pumping from bodies that have a deep draft and a large amount of excess flow.

    http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/throptone nergy/

    I know that these are available from other places as well, and I'd be surprised if you couldn't make something like this yourself if you have a little motivation...

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
  70. The environment was so clean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " it was only when the industrial revolution brought cheap mined coal that the environment started to go to shit."

    Yeah. Before that, someone in (let's say) 1850s London could drink from the Themes with no worries. Everything was so clean.

  71. DEP Regulations by spenceM7 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Assuming you mean the Susquehana River in Pennsylvania, you have to deal with DEP permits. A quick glance at the regs indicated you'd need

    a) Dam Permit - application fee of $1500-$3000
    b) Environmental Assessment Approval - free
    c) Limited Power Permit for Hydroelectric - $5 application fee and $10-10000 annual fee (depending on capacity)

    Not to mention any local or federal regulations (did you check the EPA yet?) or the permits you'll need for construction, etc.

    There's also a 30-day public comment period before the DEP rules, and they estimate it will take 220 days or so to complete the paperwork.

    Reference is from the massive PDF found at Department of Enviromental Protection

    In short, you probably don't want to build a dam.

  72. Stupid Romans by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The party line in all the history books I've read is that the Romans had water mill tech, but it only accounted for a tiny portion of their flour production. The Roman economy was based on plentiful slave labor, so finding way to do things with fewer people (in this case, hand-powered versus water-powered mills) was not a big priority.

    If you know of references that rebut the standard historical theory (wouldn't be the first time), please post links or titles. I'd want to read them

    Anyway, it's my understanding that water mills began serious development during the "Middle Ages". Modern Western culture is descended from the great cultural renaissance of the 15th century, and we've inherited their prejudice against the "Middle Ages", that 1000-year period after the fall of Rome where Western progress supposedly ground to a halt. But this period was when people started playing with technology seriously, and thinking about ways to use it to make life easier -- and to get rich. In short, it was the period that gave birth to the techno-geek!

    1. Re:Stupid Romans by hcetSJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      So clearly the solution is to invade some neighboring town, taking the people as slaves to turn a giant generator for you.

      Those Romans were smart people...

      --

      This side up.
    2. Re:Stupid Romans by crackshoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      ya know... Canada... hmmmm....

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    3. Re:Stupid Romans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      We're pretty lazy...I wouldn't try it.

    4. Re:Stupid Romans by bombadillo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You will have to post some links or recomend some litature to convince me about the middle ages were a time when tech was taken seriously. Perhaps it was due to the fact that they were re-discovering most that was forgotten or destroyed. After all it took almost 2000 years for society to start implementing things like sewage and plumbing systems into major cities.

    5. Re:Stupid Romans by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That only works as long as you don't have to compete with another country that uses more modern methods. The last major power to abandon slavery discovered this the hard way.

    6. Re:Stupid Romans by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ...convince me about the middle ages were a time when tech was taken seriously.
      When you put it like that, it's impossible to view the middle ages as anything but a regression in human progress. But when you do put it like that, you're reducing 1,000 years to a simplistic idea. That's a lot of history. Consider how much change the Western world has gone through in just the last couple of centuries, and how many different attitudes there were towards these changes.

      The right way to think about the middle ages is as a long period of history shared by a many diverse peoples. Their scientific and technological accomplishments may seem puny by our standards, but they were crucial to human progress. Improved crop rotation, use of wind and water power, the beginnings of chemistry... it's a long list.

      You want sources? Well, I'm reading Western Europe in the Middle Ages, by Joseph Strayer. This book argues a lot of the things I just said, but it's not primarily about science or technology. I think you'll find the arguments I just made in any history of the middle ages written in the last 20 years. I mean serious history, not the watered-down nonsense they put in standard secondary-school textbooks.

    7. Re:Stupid Romans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the parent should be modded funny, not insightful... :)
      I find it hillarious and oxymoronic that "The land of the Free" was the last to abolish slavery...

    8. Re:Stupid Romans by technos · · Score: 1

      Also not terribly bright.. I'd imagine a Molson on a stick would serve as motivation.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    9. Re:Stupid Romans by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Irony is not always funny. It certainly wasn't funny to African-Americans.

    10. Re:Stupid Romans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? There are a great many nations today that still allow slavery. You were tricked by the grandparent who said "the last major power to abolish slavery." Maybe. But it wasn't the last nation to abolish slavery. ASS!

    11. Re:Stupid Romans by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      obligatory Dead Kennedies: "You'll work harder with a gun in your back for a bowl of rice a day."

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    12. Re:Stupid Romans by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      more good books:
      A Distant Mirror by Barbara Tuchman. Frankly, anything by Barbara Tuchman will be a great read. This is her book about the Middle Ages.

      Lies My Teacher Told Me, by James Lueven. Analyzes the lowest common denominator aspect of US high school history texts and tries out some theories of why they're so bad.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    13. Re:Stupid Romans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an old trick. You just define the US as the smallest possible "major" nation, and then they are the last one from that sub-set to abolish slavery. A classic debate-trolling move.

  73. Why the Tubgirl reference NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...water pumping from bodies that have a deep draft and a large amount of excess flow."

    Just when I thought I had that awful image out of my head, you go and mention it again.

  74. Fishladders by skywolf · · Score: 1

    In some British rivers, we have 'fish-ladders' that salmon & trout can climb up, so that they can still ascend the rivers to breed. These consist of a series of mini-waterfalls and deep pools. The fish think it's all great fun.

  75. check out "stream engines" by polished+look+2 · · Score: 1

    Stream Engine via Google - the top link (for me) is an owner's manual

  76. Re:Uh, not too many Native American rivers in Engl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The AC you replied to clearly acknowledged that when they wrote The map linked to clearly shows that...

  77. Re:Legal ? by stiller · · Score: 1

    This is what I like to call progress.

  78. The most cost-effective solution ... by fractalkid · · Score: 1

    ... is to build an aquarium with a couple of Electric eels. They sure don't cost much, and they can produce upto 600 volts of electricity. How's that for a solution ?

    PS: Possessing Electric eels is illegal in Queensland. Not sure about the US.

    1. Re:The most cost-effective solution ... by Tristandh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They may be able to produce 600V, but that doesn't say anything about the power they deliver. I reckon electric eels can only give a short burst of current (1 Amp), enough to defend themselves. So you get very unpredictable supply of power, and you would need many eels, since I don't believe an eel could provide current for more than a fraction of a second. High power, short burst, and thus little energy...
      From your post I get the impression it has been done, but I think it wouldn't be easy and you'd need to apply quite some circuitery to get some usable output.

    2. Re:The most cost-effective solution ... by hernyo · · Score: 1

      ...the idea would work unless the eels start a revolution (http://www.whatisthematrix.com) love you fractalkid :)

  79. Gorillas by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    But what happens when the cats over-eat, get fat and die?

    Then you get dogs to eat the cats. If these become a problem, you get gorillas to eat the dogs. The gorillas won't be a problem, because, come winter, they will freeze to death.

    I don't think the cats will be a problem, however. Garfield has been over-eating and very fat for 30 or so years now, and I still see his sarcastic face in the funny papers every morning.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Gorillas by kaptkudzoo · · Score: 1

      how does feeding the cats to dogs fix the problem of surplus food for the cats?

    2. Re:Gorillas by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      how does feeding the cats to dogs fix the problem of surplus food for the cats?

      In the spring, when the gorillas thaw, the buzzards and other carrion-birds come in from across the land and scare all the fish away from the area.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:Gorillas by nosferatu-man · · Score: 1

      No, no, no: you feed the cats to RATS, and get the cat skins for nothing.

      'jfb

      --
      To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  80. The cats by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    do cats know to keep the fish out? And do they work in shifts or what??

    Some work in shifts. A few work in loincloths, but most wear the catsuits they were born with.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  81. Re:Legal ? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    Yes, because windmills big enough to generate usable electricity never chop little birdies in half. Solar panels don't cause microclimate changes.

    Not that I'm against him building a small hyrdro plant of some sort, but the nutcase manner in which you comment implies that you'd be against this, no matter how he planned on generating electricity.

  82. Why not convert it to high pressure? by dasunt · · Score: 1

    I remember a mechanism that converts a lot of low pressure water into a little high pressure water.

    Its a device called a 'water ram'.

    I haven't really looked into hydro-electric power generation, but if most designs are for low-flow/high-pressure there might be a reason.

  83. Re:Uh, not too many Native American rivers in Engl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were you aware that there is a region in the US that was colonized by folks from England? In fact they named it New England, and proceded to name many of the cities after cities in Englad. Maybe this could be the source of your confusion.

  84. Natures answer to storing kinetic energy! by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Get a whole bunch of beavers and bring them up to your house.
    Step 2: Introduce them to each other, let the sparks fly.
    Step 3: Get a hydroelectric turbine and a post hole borer.

    ... you get where I'm going with this.

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
  85. The cheapest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you are on the grid already, you would likely be nuts to go off it. Almost no homebuilt generator solution will ever pay for itself. YMMV according to your exact situation. Usually the thing that makes it practical (cheaper) to generate your own power is the cost of running power lines a couple of miles in from the road.

    The posters who suggest conservation are right. It's a good idea anyway. Normally, a dollar spent on conservation earns itself back way faster than a dollar spent on power generation.

    If I understand correctly, your problem is that the power goes off unpredictably. The solution to this is to store energy in batteries and use an inverter to convert to AC.

    If all you are running is lights, such a system is really cheap. However, if you are running something with a motor in it (like a refrigerator), there is a gotcha. To start a motor, you need three times the watts that it takes to run it.

    Example: Your main load is a 500 watt refrigerator. You have a few hundred watt light bulbs. You, of course, have a computer.
    1 - The minimum size of inverter is 1500 watts to start your refrigerator. These inverters are available at automotive stores for people with RVs and big rigs.
    2 - Use deep cycle batteries. These are sometimes called marine batteries. Ordinary car batteries are damaged by running them down too often. The deep cycle batteries don't cost any more for the same amp-hours. Regard a hundred amp-hour battery as being able to supply a kilowatt for an hour. Unless it is really hot out, your refrigerator doesn't run all the time. One battery should run your 'frig. for a few hours.
    3 - Replace the hundred watt bulbs with the new energy saving florescent bulbs with built-in ballasts. You use them the same way you use the regular bulbs. They are now cheap enough that they pay for themselves.
    4 - You can buy a powerful laptop with a dead battery for cheap. Mine uses 75 watts.
    5 - Don't try to hook the inverter into hour house wiring. Have a separate circuit for emergency power. You need a changeover switch so the inverter and the power company can't be hooked to the circuit at the same time. If you know somebody with an RV or a big truck get them to show you how their system works.

    The whole setup should only cost a couple of hundred dollars. You won't be able to approach this cost with a generator system.

  86. Local Opinion by fadethepolice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I too live near the susquehanna river.

    I have thought about this problem a lot over the last two years. My solution is low-cost, durable, and effective I believe, but does not work when the river is frozen. Use a small paddle wheel surrounded by square styrofoam floatation device. have the floataton device and a rod that functions like a broom handle connect to the paddle wheel at the axis point. As the water level changes the wheel will stay at a constant distace from the water as it rises and falls with the styrofoam around it. have the paddle wheel connect to an alternator using a rubber belt. Use the broom handle to maintain the tension between them. Attach the far end of the broom handle to a wire strung between two trees on each bank. Float 20 or 30 of these across the river and you can get some good amps. Gotta go help cook easter dinner, fill in the rest with your imagination... lol

  87. Funnel by tpledger · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Most homebuilt hydro power is lower volume/high speed. What would be a good, unobtrusive way to generate electricity from a high volume/low speed body of water?

    Would a big submerged horizontal funnel act as a current transformer? I'm picturing a slow flow into the wide end and a fast flow out of the narrow end. If that works, you'd be in a better position to use regular equipment.

    A couple of details:

    • Put a deflector grille over the wide end so that it doesn't clog so often.
    • Put your turbine underground so that you're piping the water across, not up. Or, if it's nice and waterproof, attach it straight onto the narrow end of the funnel.
    --
    You have received this message in error.
  88. Not feasible. by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The money you would spend in getting Federal, State, and local permits would offset any savings you would incur from being off grid.

    Since you said you are in the middle of nowhere I'll assume you are closer to NY than MD. Not that it matters, I'm just trying to think of a place that is in the middle of nowhere on the Susquehanna.

  89. All that glitters is not gold ... by johnjaydk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well I've spent some time playing this field professionaly. Hydro electric power can come from two types of energy kinetic (ie. high speed flow) and kinetic (ie. hight difference).

    The conventional wisdom is that unless you harness a shitload of water (big construction here) and get houndreds of cubic meters per second then the kinetic energy is essentially worthless.

    Commercial powerplants use the potential energy and since you live between to powerplant then smart money says they squezed all the juice out where you live. Lots of flow, zero energy.

    Try playing with solar power instead...

    --
    TCAP-Abort
    1. Re:All that glitters is not gold ... by really? · · Score: 1

      But, I think he is looking for a "personal" solution; the scale is different, I think.
      Also, I would assume he is also working on the conservation side.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  90. Off Grid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who are you? John Connor or something? haven't you seen the films? Going off grid is all very well, but it doesn't change the outcome, and all the trees and plants you save with your off-grid power will die in the nuclear war... sheesh!

  91. ITDG Factsheet by mykdavies · · Score: 1

    The Intermediate Technology Development Group (www.itdg.org) have an interesting factsheet (http://www.itdg.org/html/technical_enquiries/docs /micro_hydro_power.pdf) on "micro-hydropower", which gives a quick overview of some of the issues you should think about.

    They're also a charity that's well worth supporting - they train and support people in the application of simple but effective technologies appropriate to their situation.

    --
    The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
  92. MOD PARENT UP by Panda+Boner · · Score: 1

    This parent needs to be seen by the beauracratic hand-wringers and assorted whiners. If there's any red tape set up to prevent this, it needs to be cut RIGHT NOW. Of course, feeding into the grid is an entirely different story. And there is no way in hell anybody should attempt this project without spending three months in the library. Three years if you're going to tap into the grid.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just been reading about the 'Kerry Bombshell'.

      You know if^H^Hwhen you get rid of Bush later in the year the Government are going to actively PAY YOU TO DO THIS SORT OF THING (grants, renewable energy handouts etc) - hang in there :)

  93. Re:Uh, not too many Native American rivers in Engl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the point was that the shape of the colored areas of the map looks sorta like a distorted version of England. But I could be wrong.

    Toodle Pip!

  94. Re:Uh, not too many Native American rivers in Engl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, none of Pennsylvania, New York, nor Maryland are in New England...

  95. So much time, so little knowledge. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I would recommend Google to help for lack of knowledge in Physics, Math or Sciences.

    Will lead to a good first post

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  96. Low Head Hydro by hsmyers · · Score: 1

    Might be a solution. Here are a couple of links:
    http://www.engineering.lancs.ac.uk/REGROUP S/LUREG/ activities/LHHindex.asp
    http://www.itcltd.com/doc s/Low-Head%20background.p df

  97. Here's who John Galt was by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    " an incontrovertibly brilliant physician who brought the full flower of Moral Management treatment to Williamsburg"

    From The Galt Figures. He was a major figure in American mental health history.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Here's who John Galt was by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      ...Somebody who obviously hasn't read the book, and missed the reference....

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    2. Re:Here's who John Galt was by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      That's who he really was. Ayn Rand sure confused the issue when she named a character after a famous 19th century psychologist.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:Here's who John Galt was by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Yup. Sorry she didn't use a name that had never been used before. I'm thinking "Ruxpert Nuxkelitt" but it just doesn't have the same ring.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    4. Re:Here's who John Galt was by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      "Yup. Sorry she didn't use a name that had never been used before" ...in this case, a name held by two famous 19th century figures.

      She at least she could have called the character "Robert Galt", as there is no other famous Robert Galt.

      I knew of the psychologist John Galt anyway, but I googled the name and turned up another famous John Galt who was a novelist in the 19th century.

      Rand didn't have a problem coming up with a name that was not already used by famous historic persons when she came up with "Howard Roark".

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    5. Re:Here's who John Galt was by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      True. This was an era before Google though, she might just not have know of such a person.

      Or hell, it might have been some instide joke that was lost a century later.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    6. Re:Here's who John Galt was by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      True. This was an era before Google though, she might just not have know of such a person.

      Heh. How could anyone have possible ever done research before Google? :)

      Perhaps Rand was inspired by one of the two John Galts when she made her character. I've not read "Atlas Shrugged" yet. I tried 2 or 3 times to read "Fountainhead", but there was something about her writing style that made me give up after 5-10 pages each time. I'll give that one another chance someday.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  98. US Department of Energy Site by 2sleep2type · · Score: 1

    Just found this
    Energy fact sheet.
    It's good some good details on permits and selling the power etc.

  99. Re:Uh, not too many Native American rivers in Engl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, no shit Sherlock. Thanks for pointing that out cause all of us who somehow mananged to sleep through elementary school level history classes did not know that. The cities on the map have the same names as English cities, the colored area looks roughly like England, hence the original poster's joke...

  100. If you got four grand to spend ... by red_buddah · · Score: 0

    you can power your entire house with something like this: http://www.japan.com/technology/index.php

  101. simply a larger intake? by stiller · · Score: 1

    I know most here think you need either a significant drop or a fast moving body of water. But wouldn't simply increasing the intake of your plumbing solve this? Suppose you would use the entire width of the river, say 10 meters, by placing a series of intakes in parallel, about 20 cm high, with enough plumbing to lead it all to one central tube next to the river, say 10 meters downstream. This would mean a 45 degree diagonal from the outermost intake to the central tube. I have no idea how fast this river is flowing, but lets say 1 meter per minute. (that's pretty conservative, isn't it?) That amounts to about 2 cubic meters of water per minute. Thats 2000 liters/min, or something like 500 gallons/minute. Acoording to realgoods.com, that could power up to a 20 nozzle system generating a lot of juice! A 20cm rise on the bottom would probably even go unnoticed. Sure, a lot of plumbing, but then clogging would be less of a problem. Any thoughts/reality checks?

  102. Grain Mills by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Old grain mills were always built by the side of a river and hill. A bit of water would be diverted from a stream, to slew gate. It would then flow to the top of a 30 foot paddle wheel with buckets to keep the water in. The wheel turned a shaft that was then geared down to turning the mill wheel. If you have seen the movie 'The Princess Bride', they have something similar in there where they are torturing the main hero. The buckets are important as they keep the water in until they are horizontal, getting the most out of gravity. Something similar should be possible if you have a hill near you. If you can get a picture of the mill at Appomatix Court House you should be set.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  103. hydrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are fuel cells providing power today... even yesterday.

    I believe the famous example is an Alaskan US Post Office that runs completely on fuel cells provided by UTC www.utcfuelcells.com

    I'm not sure about the economics of running your own power plant, but you could probably power a little community with one block http://www.utcfuelcells.com/commercial/index.shtm

    I'm not sure about the reliability of your own power plant, but I understand it is much more efficient, better for the environment, and possibly cheaper than the grid system we use today.

  104. Don't forget your 60Hz and the phase! by RallyNick · · Score: 1

    Somehow I doubt you'll be able to pump any power into the grid unless you manage to generate it at exactly 60Hz and permanently stay in phase with the grid. Doesn't sound like an easy task at all.

    1. Re:Don't forget your 60Hz and the phase! by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's Really Easy, you just buy an inverter!

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    2. Re:Don't forget your 60Hz and the phase! by tylernt · · Score: 1

      That's what grid-tie invertors do. They are common enough to be considered off-the-shelf equipment these days, though they do cost USD$1000-$2000.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    3. Re:Don't forget your 60Hz and the phase! by panxerox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rotery inverters are really cheap basically just a dc motor running an ac generator, you get around a 20% power loss due to inefficiancy but with waterpower you have no costs anyway.

      --
      "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  105. What about fuel cell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Buy one of these power plants from UTC and sell off power to your neighbors...

    http://www.utcfuelcells.com/commercial/index.sht m

    Be a self sustaining community and stick it to the bastards in Big Energy.

  106. You might want to investigate one of by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    these It's been awhile since I've seen one, but commercially made units are also available. Basically you trade off volume for head.

    --
    C|N>K
  107. Clinton energy plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's been awhile since I've seen one, but commercially made units are also available. Basically you trade off volume for head."

    That was part of the Clinton administration energy plan. It never got far beyond initial investigations in the Oval Office.

  108. Offline Storage w/o bat. by jalspach · · Score: 1

    Whit if, however you decide to get the power (wind, solar, hydro, etc...) you use some of the electricity you gather, to pump water up into a storage tank or a small pond that is at a higher grade? Then, when you need it, you let it fall back down into the river, and generate some power on its way.
    There will obviously be some loss but, if you use power that you do not need / are not able to sell back to the grid anyway, you are not really loosing anything.
    Eliminating some batteries would also eliminate some of the environmental impact that old batteries have when they are EOL.
    I think they did something like this on the Columbia River (perhaps a bit bigger scale than you are looking for, but the idea is the same.) James -- Want to be your own boss? 1) Drink Bawls 2) turn the emptys into lamps and drinking glasses 3) ? 4) Profit!!

    1. Re:Offline Storage w/o bat. by jalspach · · Score: 1
      Ok, perhaps you are loosing something. You are loosing the H2O to create electricity. However, you are not LOSING anythihng.
      James
      --
      Want to be your own boss?
      1. Drink Bawls
      2. Turn the emptys into lamps and drinking glasses
      3. ?
      4. Profit!!
    2. Re:Offline Storage w/o bat. by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      You'd need an insane amount of water to store enough energy to do anything useful with it.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  109. Lynmouth generator now 300Kw by rkww · · Score: 1
    This is probably not the same generator as you saw in the early 90's but...

    ITPower say they "successfully installed the world's first commercial scale marine current turbine" off Lynmouth in Devon in June 2003:

    "Seaflow - a 300 kW Marine Current Turbine. IT Power heads a consortium which has piloted the development and demonstration of the world's first commercial scale marine current turbine. IT Power experts were involved in the conceptualisation and design of a prototype 300 kW pile-mounted turbine that captures energy utilising marine currents (tidal stream). Currently, the prototype is being tested in the Bristol Channel at Lynmouth, North Devon, England."

  110. Overshot Water Wheels for Small Streams by jenzinas · · Score: 1

    Overshot Water Wheels for Small Streams
    edited by Leonard G. Lee

    http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.asp?SID=&ccur re ncy=2&page=49513&category=1,46096,46100

  111. Easy Method by Long-EZ · · Score: 3, Informative
    I saw some similar /. concepts to the design that popped into my head. Also some total /. crap.

    Build a floating dock. Very common for people living on the river. Make it as wide as you can manage without drawing attention. Eight feet would be good. If you have a lot of river frontage, you could even build two or three docks. The velocity is low, so you need to capture a lot of mass. This is kinetic energy, proportional to the mass and the square of the velocity.

    Put a paddlewheel across the downstream width of the dock, maybe five feet in diameter, with two feet submerged. Nothing high tech is required. This doesn't need the optimal vane shape of a high pressure hydroelectric turbine. I'd use a shape that sheds debris to minimize maintenance.

    Use a large belt around the outer diameter of the paddlewheel to drive an automotive alternator (very large gear ratio) with an external voltage regulator. This will cost about $20 at a scrap yard. Adjust the voltage regulator to produce 14V at the batteries to null the loss in the long wires, which should be at least 10 AWG. Use a circuit breaker at the batteries and the alternator. A charge controller will prevent overcharging if the regulator fails.

    Charge a parallel bank of 12 V deep cycle discharge batteries, as used in golf carts, small boats or RVs. These are available for a decent price locally. Sealed batteries are good. Low maintenance, and no worry about explosive hydrogen offgassing. Keep the batteries warm, but vented to the outside air.

    Use a power inverter to create 120 VAC. You can buy one that syncs to the power grid if you you want to sell power back to the utility, but I wouldn't bother. I'd cut the cord completely. You can buy inverters on eBay. Trace makes good inverters.

    An alarm should monitor battery voltage and possibly charge rate. If river debris jammed the paddlewheel, you'd want to know sooner rather than later. A true geek would have it email if there was a problem.

    I'd build a big cover over the paddlewheel assembly and maybe make it look like a barbeque grill or storage locker. I wouldn't go out of my way to inquire with the authorities. Better to beg forgiveness than ask permission. "Gee, I didn't know I couldn't generate my own power."

    You'll be surprised by how much energy you get from a small & slow moving paddlewheel. Unlike sun or wind, water power is 24/7, so your battery bank can be a lot smaller with a hydro power system. For about $500 initially and battery replacements and alternator brushes every few years, you can be off the grid. Most of us don't have a river and need to use solar.

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  112. fascinating case study by stiller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, this really got me enthousiastic. This guy is truly a hydroelectric hacker. Check out those system charts, amazing!

  113. storage system by Fished · · Score: 1

    One advantage of the ram approach is that whatever tank you store the water in (maybe just an above ground swimming pool?) will also provide you with a storage system, which means no batteries. (You will have to buy an hydraulic regulator of some kind though).

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:storage system by darkith · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, good point.

      Maybe a low-flow generator, with excess water (in low demand periods) directed at a ram pump to store water for high demand periods.

      I supposed you could do the same thing by using just a generator and electric pump, but the ram pump might actually be more efficient, and is probably more reliable in the long run.

    2. Re:storage system by Fished · · Score: 1

      Pumping it electrically will get you into some conservation of energy problems, whereas a hydraulic ram uses the flow of the water to pump it. You're still harnessing the flow of the water, just indirectly this way.

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  114. That sounds like a good idea to me by pimpbott · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In fact, I have seen people rig up homebrewed windmills fairly easily with bicycle parts to transfer the energy and to experiment with different gear ratios. Bike parts are tough, cheap, plentiful and easy to work on. It seems to me that you could build a paddlewheel boat fairly easily and link the paddlewheel to a generator with some old beater bike sprockets. Go with steel, aluminum wears to fast for constant use. Instead of lubing the chain with oil, use grease. A nickel plated chain will resist corrosion as well.

    1. Re:That sounds like a good idea to me by pimpbott · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heck, for that matter, you could easily build a low rent rig with the paddleboat, a car alternator and a nice chubby bank of batteries. Paddlewheel boat drives alternator(s), slow charges bank of batteries, which outputs to an inverter. The boat will quietly charge your batteries until you need the juice. When your power fails, an auto-switch kicks you off the grid and over to the inverter powered by the batteries for the duration of your blackout. The tricks here is getting the alternator to spin fast enough to charge the batteries at a reasonable rate, and figuring out exactly how much battery you need (duration of blackouts) to run a big enough inverter. That is, figure out how much power you can live with and get an inverter rated at 1.5X that amount. If you stick with off the shelf parts, you should be able to do this fairly cheaply and easily, and keep reliability up there.

    2. Re:That sounds like a good idea to me by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      If you google for "home brew alternator" you will find a design that uses a car brake disc as the rotor, with permanent magnets attached, and a hand-wound stator. It looks pretty simple to make, and will charge 12v and 24v batteries (depending on how you connect the stator coils) at a few hundred rpm. It's designed for windmills, but I'm sure a water wheel would work just as well.


      Instead of bike chains, use PowerGrip belts. They will survive under water far better than bike chains. Get the timing belt off the car you break for the front hub and brake disk, and you've got a 2:1 ratio right there.

  115. Sailboat idea by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    there exists a tow-behind your sailboat generator I have seen. Looks like a dinky torpedo that is trailed behind, the little props spin, you get juice.

    Hey.... maybe you could use the electricity to run a large fan which would blow in the sails and keep your sailboat moving even when there's no wind. Why hasn't anyone else thought of this before? :-/

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  116. One of my business partners... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ...is a doctor. He has a friend - also a doctor - who has the pasttime of collecting (!) small to medium sized hydro electric plants and steam engines. And this is in germany (Sauerland and the surroundings).
    Here the rights to use hydroelectricity are bound to the plant itself.
    I've read here that you need a permit and have to pay lots of money. I suggest you get the local politicians interessted in this and have the county join in on a project - just to save you some hassle with the work and paperwork.
    Otherwise I'd suggest you find out if a wind generator costs any fee and is feasable or you take solar right from the start.
    These hydroplants are very difficult to build and require experience and massive building (damming the river, lots of concrete, and all that).

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  117. Verdant Power Turbines by igzebier · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's something that sounds just like what you're looking for:
    In the east channel of the East River, next to Roosevelt Island and in the shadow of the largest power plant in NY State, Verdant Power has been deploying a small farm of low speed turbines to tap the force of the tidal stream that flows back and forth in the channel.

    In the scale you're interested in, a ten foot turbine can power 25 homes.

    There is an article about it at the Roosevelt Island Wire website.

    1. Re:Verdant Power Turbines by CyBlue · · Score: 1

      To use this idea, he would have to dam up the river (impossible) or have some substantially large basin (not practical) on his property for the water to flow in and out of in addition to several feet (5-10?) of river height fluctuation each day. Since he says that he's between 2 dams, my guess would be that the 4-6' rise/fall mentioned in the post would be seasonal or sporadic.

    2. Re:Verdant Power Turbines by CyBlue · · Score: 1

      After looking over the site a bit more, I see its a different tidal technology than I was familiar with. However, it would still likely require anchoring this "ten foot turbine" in the main channel of the waterway ;-).

  118. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that link just describes the setup of the poster. big slow-flowing river where he can moor a boat in. HAve a big propellor-like turbine being towed behind it (2 metres across) and gear-up the rpms to drive an alternator. Shoulndt cost more than 5000 if you design and build your own turbine from fibreglass/GRP. (if it is not fast turning, you have a lot of leeway wrt inaccuracies with building it)

  119. Copper roof barn by niktesla · · Score: 0

    Too bad you don't have high voltage lines running across your property. If you did, then you could do like a farmer who roofed his barn in copper and got "free" power via induction from the overhead HV lines. I recall that the power company didn't like it, but the court ruled in the farmer's favor.

    --
    I've discovered a remarkable proof, but this margin is too small to contain it...
  120. Static Generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  121. Grammar nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the year the Government are"

    That is more properly: "The Government is"

    "actively PAY YOU TO DO THIS SORT OF THING"

    This is just part of how Kerry plans to greatly increase the the defecit with more waste spending. If you thought it was bad under Bush....

  122. Mermaids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The hill thing
    is basically what will give you your hydro head."

    some of us relay on mermaids.

    1. Re:Mermaids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      some of us relay on mermaids.

      What about the Mermen, you insensitive clod?

    2. Re:Mermaids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      relay? Huh?

  123. Hydro Radio by AikenDrumGotWired · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Since the poster did not state which branch of the Susquehanna he lives near I am not sure of he is close enough to the location of
    • http://www.wjffradio.org/
    for them to be able to render him any assistance or inspiration. WJFF is a public radio station that is run entirely off a hydro generator(water conditions permitting). It makes a nice little case study for those who say it can't be done, or for those who do not live in a state that has net metering laws, or one with intolerably cumbersome restrictions.
  124. Water wheel? by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with the classic European-style water wheel used in mills?

    -psy

    1. Re:Water wheel? by einstein · · Score: 1

      water wheels traditionally need a mill run, and a drop. I'm basically on a lake that has a lot of moving water... and no hill to make the water drop from.

    2. Re:Water wheel? by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      You can't do an undershot wheel?

      -psy

    3. Re:Water wheel? by einstein · · Score: 1

      that may be a possibility, but I think in order to get the power I'd need, the wheel would need to be huge. The possibilties some of the submersible generators seem to be what I'm leaning towards, because I'm sure a undershot waterwheel on a floating platform wouldn't work so well in the winter.

  125. Maybe a sling pump... by Halvard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A sling pump doesn't use electricity to pump, rather the stored energy of the moving water. So use that to fill a tank at higher elevation feeding a small turbine. With a sling pump you just have to moor it (or tie it off to a dock) on a body of moving water. Check out Rife Ram for an example. I suppose if you were really industrious, you could use the runoff from the turbine to feed a hydraulic ram pump to fill the tank back up or another tank to, say, water the garden and lawn.

  126. VW power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do what my uncle did for one of his shops. It really *was* in the middle of nowhere. (I don't think you're within 1500 miles of "nowhere" if you're that close to NY, MD, PA, or OH. Anyway, he had a type 1 vw engine set to run both a sawmill and a generator. You set the idle way low, it just runs at a single speed, it's fairly quiet, and while gas ain't cheap, it's still a reasonable fuel.

  127. Check out the Rainbow Power Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Check out the Rainbow Power Company. They do the clean, green, small scale stuff in Australia, and focus on stuff you can buy and use rather than geek theories.


    While it may not be practical to buy from them, they may be able to offer pointers to someone more local or suggestions as to what you can practically do.

  128. Sailboat generators... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem with sailboat generators is they're designed to be used when the boat is travelling at least 5-6 knots. That's very fast for a river, and nothing like the Susquehanna that I've seen. So they're definately not the low-velocity, high-torque units you seek. Secondly, they generally produce less than 1kW -- enough for lighting and electronics aboard a sailboat, but not enough for a home. Finally, they're expensive, suffering from low-volume production, and the "yachtsman's discount."

    1. Re:Sailboat generators... by zogger · · Score: 1

      When i glanced at their page, I think their specs said they will work at 1.5 knots current and at that give you 200 amp hours in 24 hours operation. Maybe. With that said, ya, probably true,and no, didn't look at the price, but probably expensive. Just a very easy solution if he's determined to go the hydro route. Could even "stealth" install it in if a normal dock is allowed there on the river. tie it to the end of the dock, and make sure it doesn't go too far out. Nothing more complicated than a mooring mount and chuck it in the water. They come with a long power lead, I forget what they said, 80 ft? Plenty anyway, then tie into that and take it away to wherever you need it.

      Basically though, that's why I recommended the solar/wind/fuel genny hybrid system over the hydro. It's an idea that has been worked out over the past coupla decades by the alternative energy community through exhaustive trial and error, if you are giving a general bit of advice solution.

      Low head personal hydro is fabulous IF you can control the hydro part on your own property, say from a good flowing artesian spring that only exists on your property. Usually regulations are insane about it with streeams and rivers that cross property boundaries. In the US despite needing more energy, the fool government is de commissioning all sorts of small hydro generational facilities. They even brag about it. Nutjobs. Hydro is about the most reliable and cleanest source of energy conversion you can get. And even if you got all the permits and built the thing, then they could potentially shut you down if some do gooder discovers the three toed flying bat newt once lived within a mile of your dam or spillway thing.

      I like solar because it's so scalable,start cheap and work your way up, it's modular to boot,mounting solutions are numerous, and very quiet and no moving parts and "just works". Little more expensive per watt, but it's still godd if you value "just works". I like wind because you get good bang for your buck, real good. I like fuel gennys because in a pinch if you need a lot of juice right then and there for a specific task, you got it. For example, a lot of pure off grid places get by quite well for all their day to day stuff except running the well. What they do is have large thousand gallon + water tanks, run the genny just long enough to keep the tanks full so you have tap pressure. Most ot the time the genny isn't needed. This hybrid combo works well, and if it's just a good adjunct to the grid, well, it's about a good a guarantee of a supply as juice as you are gonna get.

  129. f-f-f-f-f-t by zogger · · Score: 1

    hahahahahahaha

    perpetual sail motion! Why naught??? No probs you CAN get a patent from the US patent office!

    They DO make "dynamic" sailors , they use the turbosails design developed by jacques cousteau, used on his ship the alcyone. Nifty stuff. I've also seen some plans but have not seen any examples of using savonius vertical axis rotors with sailing. They have made a lot of low speed high torgue electrical generators out of them though, the most common backyard cobjob using cut in half steel drums that are welded together in a "ying yang" shape that revolves around a vertical axis and uses reduction gearing (ususally an old truck rear end) to turn a genny or alternator. Sorta like your little home anemometer on steroids looking things.

  130. Permits? Regulations? Whatever. by phyrebyrd · · Score: 1

    Look, small personal power plants are not only legal, they're encouraged. I've been researching "Alternative Power" myself, and one site that I've found that is helpful is www.fieldlines.com

    They have lots of useful information for creating electricity from various forms of generators, including hydro, solar and wind among other things.

    As far as I know, if the structure doesn't alter the flow of water, there's no need for permits, rules, regulations... And ya know what? I wouldn't care if there were.

    If I were to do something like this, and it didn't release anything into the environment and posed no risk to anyone or anything... Then hey, I'd do it -- We're taxed enough already, why ASK for more taxation?

    Hey, isn't that what the whole "Boston Tea Party" was about? Seems to me we need another party.

    -Phyre

    --
    "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." -Thom
  131. What I would try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wish I had noticed this story sooner, doubt anyone will notice this post now.

    I was researching renewable energy quite a bit a few years back. I can't recall the site that I saw that had a lot of these, but they sound quite useful. they're basically alternators stuck in a prop, you put two decent sized rocks in the water to create sort of a jet of water (like when you use your thumb on a water hose), then put one of these in that.

    here's one

  132. The paddelwheel method is the way to go by rspress · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The paddelwheel method is the way to go but actually putting it in the river would not be.

    More than likely this would be an illegal to do and dangerous as well. A better way to go would be a diversion channel that diverts a small amount of water from the river. At the top of the project or head would be a simple weir or gate to control the flow of water during the changing levels of the river. Depending on the amount of drop between the head and the wheel might give you higher speeds than the river itself could create. After the wheel you simply channel the water back to the river. The channeling back may be the hardest part of the project. As changing river levels might be harder to control and water may back up into the system. It depends on your situation. You may be able to gain a little elevation by using a shallower slope than the river has. Water needs at least a .15 of inch drop every 100 feet to move..and that is slow moving water.

    In any case, you would need to survey the job and use an optical level or a laser level to determine the drop between where you pull the water out and where you put it back in. This could be a costly project depending of the generating needs and your state laws, county laws..etc. But the way stated above is probably the only way to do it legally.

  133. Costs by antic · · Score: 1

    You're probably also looking to miniaturise the cost of that recently reported snail -- $9m+ doesn't quite have it at the home-user (or even, dare I say it, prosumer) level!

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  134. Jackrabbit submersable generator. by Charcharodon · · Score: 4, Informative
    Take a look at www.realgoods.com

    http://www.realgoods.com/renew/shop/product.cfm?dp =1200&sd=1201&ts=1017104

    They sell a product called the Jackrabbit. Orginally it was used for oil survey sleds that were towed. This way you could mount them without having to build anything elaborate to change the water flow. This should work nicely for what you are wanting.

    1. Re:Jackrabbit submersable generator. by bluephone · · Score: 1

      Wow. This looks like it rocks. A small floating dock in the river (after getting the permits, yay PA beauracracy), make a trap door in the middle, drop a few of these down in, and it's a totally covert method. Drop a little conduit in the lawn to run lines back the the house... :)

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  135. Last time I checked.......... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1



    They hadn't yet put a tax on sunlight / gravity.

    Better keep it quiet - we'll only give them ideas ;)

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  136. Book by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I believe the book you are talking about is this one, which I found just by Googling for the title...it was written in 1917, so it's a bit newer than you were thinking, though.

    It's part one of a two-book set, apparently: "The Theory of Machines" is the whole thing, then broken into "Part I The Principles of Mechanism" and "Part II Elementary Mechanics of Machines."

    Seems fairly interesting, although I'm not going to run right out and buy a copy (sorry, I'm broke) but if anyone does, and finds that it's beyond copyright, perhaps they'd like to scan some pages for us? Those old mechanical engineering books are fascinating, to me at least. I love the old pen-and-ink illustrations especially.

    OT: Anyone who is similarly interested might also want to check out a book called "Steam" published by the Babcock and Wilcox boiler company. It was published annually starting I believe in the 1930s, although my edition is from the very early 50s. It's pretty much everything you ever wanted to know about making steam from burning stuff. (No, not exactly environmentally friendly, but it does work.)

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Book by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound like the one I have, but it could be a later edition. Your cite is a revised edition from 1917, mine is much older. There's nothing in my book to indicate it's part of a 2 vol set. That probably came later. I suspect your 2 vol set is an expanded version of my book, broken down into 2 vols, since the "mechanics of machines" seems to describe the last half of my book.
      Of course we could be shooting in the dark, "Principles of Mechanism" is a pretty generic title for a mechanical principles textbook. The best way to tell if we're talking about the same book is if the it has that engraving of the guy standing at the base of a 100 foot gear. It's standing upright like a wheel, not on it's side, and it's impressive as all hell.

  137. It probably isn't legal. by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 3, Informative
    LOL. Of course its legal.

    LOL, it might help if you had some idea what you were talking about. The Sesquehanna is a navigable waterway, and 33 USC 403 seems to be of the opinion that you need the permission of the federal government to construct anything, such as the poster's waterwheel, which would obstruct that waterway.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  138. Don't miss work done in India on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you google for "micro hydel iit" you'll find
    interesting hits on this topic. NOTE: Hydel is
    the Indian-English term for Hydro power.
    When I was working at IIT Delhi I interviewed
    a young woman who had just completed a research
    assistantship during which she and her professor
    developed a generating unit that would fit your
    requirements. They used a type of rotary pump
    that is mass-produced cheaply in India (used it in
    reverse of course), and they got good results.
    Unfortunately I wasn't able to hire the young
    woman, and I don't have any references for you.

    1. Re:Don't miss work done in India on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This page, from the EE Dept. of IIT Delhi, contains
      pictures of two different Micro Hydel projects.

      (scroll down a lot)

      Not pretty, but that's not the point...

      Also, I've now found a reference to the work done by
      the young woman that I mentioned in the parent:

      [AUTHOR: Prof. S.S. Murthy]
      TITLE -A Practical Load Controller for stand Alone Small Hydro Systems Using Self-excited Induction Generator
      JOURNAL/CONFERENCE-Proc. of International conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems for Industrial Growth(PEDES'98), 1-3Dec., 1998,Perth, Australia, Vol.1,pp.359-364
      CO-AUTHOR-Rini Jose,Bhim Singh

      I got that reference from this page.

  139. Look to Marine Technologies by RubberJohnny · · Score: 5, Informative


    I don't know what the average flow of the Susquehanna is but I doubt it's really a slow river. I do know the Mississippi is typically moving about 4 knots and it is considered by boatmen to be an absolute bear to travel upstream. Recreational boating in the main Mississippi channel is near zero because the current's just too strong. I'm betting your river is faster.

    A sailboat (monohull recreational boat big enough to have a galley) is making fair time if he averages six knots. Six knots is enough to generate a helluva lot of electricity using a water generator (they call them "spinners" and some of them will convert to wind generators if you get the urge). These things are not even that expensive.

    Contrary to some of the alarmist nonsense being posted here, as long as you are not messing around in a wetland (swampy, boggy marshy place) and you don't propose to do any dredging, the Corps of Engineers presumes that all docks and piers for small boats will be approved for riparian use on ALL navigable waterways as long as you don't interfere with navigation. Possibly you have stronger local regulations, but get your COE permit and I think everything else will fall into place pretty easily. Sink a couple pilings, hang the spinners deep enough to keep from freezing and I expect you're in business.

    1. Re:Look to Marine Technologies by einstein · · Score: 1

      I really don't have any hard numbers, but this part of the river I'm talking about is called "Lake Aldred" and is between to large hydroelectric dams.

      any suggestions on a good way to measure water speed?

    2. Re:Look to Marine Technologies by RubberJohnny · · Score: 1


      Flow is generally measured in volume per time, cubic feet per second, like that. These are easy to find for your river:

      http://waterdata.usgs.gov/pa/nwis/current?type=f lo w

      Scroll to the Susquehanna, likewise:

      http://pa.water.usgs.gov/durplots/stream_duratio n. html

      This tells you nothing about the velocity because you don't know the size of the pipe. I don't know either, and neither of us knows how fast the Susquehanna can turn a watergen, which is the point of the excercise.

      Knots: measure of boat speed. Tie knots in a long rope 50 feet apart. Definition of "feet" is literally an excercise for the reader--your foot is one foot. This work is tedious and by tradition is performed while drunk. Okay.

      Heave a log over the side with the rope tied to it. The log is supposed to stay stationary so you can measure against it. Except that the log floats and it is followed by a half mile of hemp rope, and that floats too, everything is moving around, so there is a certain margin for error. We don't know what the margin is. Speed is the number of 50-foot knots shouted out per 30 seconds where the seconds are measure with an hourglass.

      It's not very *accurate*.

      By convention one knot is 1.15 miles per hour rounded off. Just live with it. If you really want to measure the flow just measure the damn flow. Rope is cheap at the Home Depot. Get to it.

      If you call the watergen manufacturer and say "my source flows by here at five knots, I know because I tied the knots" they will probably be overcome with wonderment and give you all the gear for free. Well maybe. They will admire you for being well prepared in any case.

  140. I'd be happy to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rent you a pair of nice copper bars for a reasonable price...

  141. Energy off slow moving water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Done deal.

    Look on page 125 of "Home Power", April/May issue.

    (downloadable from www.homepower.com)

    Lower right hand corner of that page, look for the ad titled "No-Hassle Water Power".

    Though no web site is given, a google for the company shows it's a manufacturer of marine equipment and the device they are selling was originally designed for generating electricity on sailboats under sail power.

  142. Re: High volume, low speed by pr0cess · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some people build what's known as "microcentrals", which are esentially rotary water pumps working backwards. They make water flow into the pump so it turns the turbine and makes the engine act as a generator. I guess some modification is required to stabilize and clean the resulting current, but it shouldn't be too difficult to do. But no matter what system you're going to use, if you want a steady, reliable electric production you're going to need a water and some supplementary infrastructure (pipeline, energy dissipators, etc). That's where the city and environmental agency folks come in, and that's where it gets bumpy.

  143. It can be done by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    But where a navigable river is concerned it's sometimes easier to go with solar or wind. But if you can get a permit for a dock, there are options for low head hydro power. If you have to use a paddle wheel it would complicate things a bit.

    hydro systems Has some low profile, low head units.

    Might want to think about a combo system, depending on how much wattage you're after.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  144. Real power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use the masturbation power station. Too much power.

  145. Re:User/pass for Home Power's site (no!) by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do not use that username/password.

    Home Power is a very small grassroot-ish site. I've been dowloading their current issue for a couple of years now. A few months back they stopped just having a link to the issue on the front page and went to registration. The reason they need the registration is to prove how many unique visitors download and read the mag for their advertising rates on ads inside the magazine. If they can't prove their readership size, their ad rates fall. And they're not some big megacorp, they're already on a shoe-string budget. If you want to read it, sign up. They've never abused my info, and the magazine is awesome for the depth of info provided.

  146. Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by purduephotog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    True story:

    My neighbor wanted to take down his tree. It was 150 feet tall. The city only allows licensed tree cutters, which wanted in excess of 500$ to do so.

    So... we took it down. Six guys and a 1987 GM pickup truck.

    Mind you it took 5 hours, and had I not removed the gutters from my roof to work on the soffits, the top of the tree would have removed them for me (and probably much faster with less trepidation).

    So the city makes a drive by midweek... and he gets a phone call and a citation for a whopping fine for not having used a licensed tree removal service. Convincing them that 6 guys and a pickup truck actually did the work took some time, but eventually he won.

    He was then cited for not having replanted a tree within 10 feet of the road within 1 week (another ordinance) and fined 150$.

    Face it- the government can and will spank you if someone gets their panties in a big of enough twist.

    1. Re:Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by westlake · · Score: 1
      My neighbor wanted to take down his tree. It was 150 feet tall.

      I think a job of that size and danger, I'd leave to the pros or at least make damn sure of my potential liability first.

    2. Re:Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      6 people times 5 hours equals 30 man-hours. Add fuel, wear and tear. I believe the tree removal service would have been a bargain. Even without the fines and the hassle.

    3. Re:Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by dubious9 · · Score: 1

      Except that if you use your friends you can pay them with two cases of beer and a couple pizzas, plus the joy of working with big stuff and using chainsaws.

      Hmmm... beer... chainsaws... yeah, better go with the professionals.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    4. Re:Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      You're not getting it- He and his friends had a great time it sounds like, he had the satisfaction of not being pushed around by some boneheaded rule. They did it their own damn selves.

      Dang people, live a little.....enjoy life.

      I cannot believe that I am on /. having to encourage anti-social behavior. What the heck has happened to this place? Do we only feel like being anti-social if it involves sitting safely in our houses and downloading copyrighted material?

    5. Re:Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      My neighbor wanted to take down his tree. It was 150 feet tall.

      I'm sure I don't have enough information to judge, but... what the heck is this guy thinking? He'd got a fifteen-story tree, a masterpiece of Nature's art, and he wants to get rid of it?

      The tallest thing that grows on our God-forsaken played-out cotton field is mesquite, which would grow to maybe 20 feet if left alone, but turns into a spiky 5-foot bush 'cause the ranchers keep cutting it down. I'd give my left n^Hleg for a 150-foot tree out here!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    6. Re:Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by juhaz · · Score: 1

      I can't understand, or stand for that matter, people who think everyone absolutely should have a tax meter ticking for every last frickin' second of their lives.

      Have you ever heard of a concept called free time?

    7. Re:Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have heard of a concept called free time. Have you?
      Did you even read my post? I posted a comment that paying some professional to do a menial job that would take a layman 30 man hours in order to save your free time is a pretty good deal. I'm not rich, but I could probably afford the professional tree cutting service after a couple days of work. If that money could save me !!!30!!! hours of my free time to spend with my family or whatever hobby, that's a bargain.
      I've worked damn hard for my free time. I get two days off for every 5 days worked. After I get done all the minutia that my life requires, such as paying taxes, doing laundry, going grocery shopping I have about 1 day per week to spend with my family. If I had to pay some bureacracy mandated bozo to cut down my tree, I would rather do that than lose one of those few days a month that I have to spend alone with my family. That's how I'd spend my free time.
      Not everyone has the same interests or priorities. Maybe you have more free time than I do. Maybe you don't have a family or wish to spend time with them. Maybe cutting down trees is your favorite stress relieving hobby. Knock yourself out.

  147. public rights to waterways by Jafa · · Score: 1

    There are probably a lot of regulations to get through, but also keep in mind that in nearly all states, water ways are public modes of transportation. So if a craft can navigate it, it's officially public (up to mean high level mark) unless challenged.

    There are currently a few states with high-profile challenges going on, where a river runs through a persons property, so they own both sides of the river. Will be extremely interesting how these turn out.

    Some good info:
    Navigability:
    http://www.americanwhitewater.org/access/navigabil ity.htm
    access issues:
    http://www.americanwhitewater.org/access/

    J

  148. Don't forget about the EPA by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Back in the old EE days in college we tried to set up some wind powered electrical generators. The EPA wanted us to do an environmental impact study before granting us a permit.

    If a well funded college could not afford it, I doubt an average joe can.

    Good luck though. It seems like an interesting project.

    -ted

  149. Middle Ages by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Dark Ages: ~476 C.E. to ~ 1000 C.E.

    Middle Ages: ~500 C.E. to ~1500 C.E.

    Renaissance: mid 1300's C.E. to mid 1700's C.E.

    The Dark Ages are rightly named. The late Middle Ages is when civilization reversed its deteriorating trend.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Middle Ages by fm6 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's the authoritative labelling of the Ages? By the Age Certification Agency?

    2. Re:Middle Ages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
      The late Middle Ages is when civilization reversed its deteriorating trend.

      I think you mean "Western, post-Greco-Roman civilisation". All kinds of other cool stuff was going on in India, China, Japan, Arabia, Central and South America - you get the idea. In fact, the Arabic age of enlightenment pretty much corresponds to the dark ages west of Byzantium.

      (Not to leave out Australia, Mongolia/Siberia, North America, Africa, but those were less interested in civilisation per se - which is not a bad thing at all given that there are pros and cons to the big C, often including and not limited to the mentioned centuries of darkness and misery.)

      Given that the European Dark Ages were pretty much squarely the result of Christianity, I wouldn't necessarily say the trend has quite reversed yet...

    3. Re:Middle Ages by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      What's this CE shit, are you a Jehovah's Witness?

    4. Re:Middle Ages by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Anyone want to guess who named the Dark Ages the "Dark Ages"? Well I'll save you to time, it was the folks in the Renaissance who decided to do so. In all actuality, the Dark Ages have a great deal of art, literature and music that have impacted society. During this time period the Christian Churches really began to become the learning centers of western europe and a huge volume of philosophical work came out of this time. This was also the period in which the Gregorian Chants came from and are quite breathtaking (in my opinion). Furthermore, epic tales such as that of Beowulf and an assortment of other mythological tales came out of this era (If my memory serves me, the story of King Arthur comes from a historical figure in the 5th or 6th century). Anyhow, there is nothing dark about the dark ages, it's just the blokes from the Renaissance that decided to name it that (just as the people of the enlightenment era named themeselves as such ... hell we call ourselves the era of modernity or post-modernity so those names are indicative of nothing.)

  150. Use Multiple Ram Pumps by 6800 · · Score: 1

    If you have a hill or can build a tower with a tank on top (like the old wind mill towers), you could then set up multiple ram pumps (enough for the volume you need, with the head you have from that tank elevation) to place water into the tank, then the gravity feed from the tank will run your pelton wheel or whatever type you desire!

  151. Thats why you vote! by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Make a big stink in city hall, and if the charges are not dropped, work for the opposition candidate and get rid of everyone in city hall and change the rules. Most cities are small enough that if you really work it yourself you can get rid of everyone in charge. (Not the big ones, but even then the suburbs are small enough that you can get rid of the current console if you spend your time knocking on doors every night)

    Though as my dad says "You should never watch laws or sausage being made, for the same reasons". Still you can make a difference.

  152. Legalities of the Susquehanna by plnrtrvlr · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK.. I grew up along the Susquehanna and have lived near it all my life. The stupidest things you can think of can be illegal for reasons you never thought of before, so it isn't as easy as saying "of course its legal." It sounds to me from his description that he's located somewhere below Rock Bottom Dam, after the Chenango River joins it. The river can have some wild fluctuations in level, has a tremendous high volume of water (second only to the Hudson) for NY, and anything you build is going to have to deal with the hazards that come along with that: ie your "power station" being flooded over or completely washed away, entire trees washing down river and turning wooden structures to floatsam, etc. You want to anchor a dock in the river, better be prepared to lose your water wheel. You want to make a dock/mill wheel that floats and is on firm footings in the river so it doesn't get lost? Better talk to the DEC and the Fish and Wildlife comission: they have a LOT to say about anything more than a few wooden pilings put into the river. The posters best bet would be a simple water wheel put on a wooden dock that was floated on plastic drums. Two concrete dead-men on the bank to anchor it into place and skip the batteries just in case he lost the whole contraption to the river. A better suggestion still would be to get out of this god-awful high tax, high energy cost, high pain in the gluteus maximus place (I worked rebuilding a bridge over that river once where the project was delayed two months just in case we might have disturbed the walleye from spawning) and get somewhere that he doesn't mind paying his electric bill. 10.55 a kilowatt here baby, we all love NYSEG.

  153. You're not in the middle of nowhere... by John+Murdoch · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're in either Pennsylvania or New York. And you're on a river that has been actively dammed and controlled for over two hundred years. Which means that your property either has deeded mill rights, or it doesn't. And if it doesn't, you have no legal right to divert the water in the river to power a generator. Which is to say, attempting to divert river flow to generate electricity could get you in a world of trouble.

    What about in-river systems?
    Good question--and I'm sure that your state environmental agency will tell you. And I'd bet money their first answer will be "no." Bureaucrats are bureaucrats--and anything that is likely to cause them additional work is almost certain to be turned down.

    This doesn't mean you're dead
    What you can do to help grease the skids with your state authorities is to contact your local state legislator. If you're in Pennsylvania you'll find that a lot of legislators are extremely interested in "constituent service." Call the legislator's district office, and explain where you live (make sure you live in that legislator's district) and what you're trying to do. You want to know if the state has any information on the subject, and how you can go about finding out. You will be talking to an intern--a breathless, endlessly enthusiastic young person who is just itching to find answers. You may find it astonishing how quickly you will get answers--and since the question came from Rep. Stuffedshirt's office, the answer is far more likely to be "yes."

    Visit the county courthouse
    If your property at the river's edge shows any kind of swale or evidence of an old channel, go to your county courthouse and ask for the Recorder of Deeds office. Ask for help in searching for mill rights--and whether or not your property ever had mill rights assigned, or was subdivided from property that had mill rights. If the answer is yes, you should ask your county bar association for a referral to an attorney with experience in real estate law--what you're looking to do is assert that you want to take advantage of mill rights that were deeded with the property years ago.

    On the off chance that mill rights were awarded to your property years ago, you may be able to do this. In the more likely event that you do not already have mill rights, you'll have to do some design work, get a registered professional civil engineer, and go through a planning process that will include the state environment regulators, the utility company that owns the hydro dam downstream (most likely PP&L), and probably the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. And unless you have a very long stretch of shoreline, you'll have to get permission from your neighbors to dig a mill race upstream, and a tail race downstream. (This, of course, means that you'll be providing them with free electricity too.)

    But what about a floating generator in midstream?
    If you're in Pennsylvania, good luck. The Susquehanna is full of boaters and fishermen, and the state is going to regulate you to death with concerns about who might hit it, how you'll secure it during the winter, and whether you have adequate insurance coverage for any possible liability.

    In short--I think you'll find that the licensing, permitting, and assorted legal folderol will make the project economically infeasible.

  154. beer nuts. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

    einstein, I would suggest checking with your local city or county office before giving too much thought to your plan.

    Considering you are downstream of a hydro-electric dam, it is likely the power company or the county has some kind of easement on the water way. I don't know how kindly they would take to someone building a structure on their property.

  155. Personal hydroelectric power by Ricdude · · Score: 3, Interesting
    http://www.realgoods.com/renew/shop/product.cfm?dp =1200&sd=1201&ts=1017104

    Jack Rabbit Submersible Hydro Generator

    No Pipes or Dams! Power from any Fast-Running Stream or Tidal Flow!

    The Jack Rabbit is a special low-speed alternator mounted in a heavy-duty, oil-filled, cast aluminum housing with triple shaft seals. Orginally designed for towing behind seismic sleds for oil exploration, this marine-duty unit is ideal for home power generation near a reasonably fast-moving stream. In a 9 mph stream (slow jog) the Jack Rabbit produces about 2,400 watt-hours daily. Ina 6 mph stream (brisk walk) it produces over 1,500 watt-hours. The 12.5" propeller requires 13" of water depth. A rock or timber venturi can often be constructed to increase stream speed and power output.

    --
    How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
  156. Irrigation canals in Brazil used a venitian blind by fuzzy1 · · Score: 1

    Irrigation canals in Brazil used a venitian blind loop for local power. 20 odd years ago at least.

    like little wings on a pulley set up
    vertically in the canal.

    --
    We create our society every time we interact with each other. What kind of society did you create today?
  157. So you want to make power on the Susquehanna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, you might want to ask the good folks up/down river (since you said middle of nowhere, i'm guessing down) at Three Mile Island for a few pointers first.

    Good luck. And remember, you can always evacuate a 10-mile radius when things don't go as planned.

  158. well, for starters by geekoid · · Score: 1

    you could stop dropping your hat on the power switch...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  159. The easy way by Sci_Fox · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall a news report back in the Bosnia conflict, showing people who were desperate for electrical power building thier own generators from the scrap around them.
    A simple wooden raft tethered to a bridge, secured to that raft the rear axel from a car with paddle wheels attatched to each wheel. The drive shaft was then secured into the back of an old washing machine.
    Water turn wheels, wheels turn drive shaft, drive shaft turn motor inside washing machine, produce power.

    You'd be better off buying an actuall generator, rather than the far less efficient moter-method, but the rest is easy enough for someone with basic woodworking skills and an old rear-wheel drive car laying around.

  160. Just use a hydro turbine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are mainly 3 types of hydro turbines: Kaplan, Francis and Pelton. They are used for different volume/pressure combinations. Your case seems to need a Kaplan turbine but you will have to have at least 1 to 3 meters of water level difference.

    Here in Brazil nearly 90% of all the eletric power in the country is hydro generated so we have some courses on hydro generators on undergrad mechanical engineer schools.

    If you are serious about doing this I suggest contacting a engineering company or to buy a complete solution from G&E or similar company. It won't come cheap thought. A rule of thumb for hydro power is the bigger the installation, the more efficient it is, so I'm unaware of any off-the-self solutions.

    If you are only trying to play with energy generation or does not care about efficiency, you can try to use a medieval-kind water-mill (there should be lots of photos on the net), but attaching a generator to axle. Remember that it would move slow, so you will probably need a gear box to archieve the 60/50Hz speed needed by the AC generator. (I have no idea of how can you keep the speed constant using a similar "low-tech" way thought)

  161. You know how projects grow- by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    all the men came out and couldn't help but watch ... and then volunteer their help. Heh. Fortunately we had ourselves a monkey that works on bridges, and he decided to climb alot where he needed to. The rest was taken care of with ropes thrown over the tallest branches and strategic cuts to make it fall away from the houses.

    OK maybe it was 5 hours... but it was most of the afternoon. And still rather fun :)

  162. [OT] $500 for a 150' tree? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    That's dirt cheep around here. My neighbor got quoted US$4000 for a tree less than 50 foot tall, in the Washington, DC area.

    He went with the lowest bid (one of his wife's clients), for $2500. I've been helping him cut and split wood almost every weekend since they dropped it, almost two months ago, but he got a citation from the county for having a dead tree or its products on his property not even two weeks after it was dropped. [we're assuming they were citing him for the downed tree, and not mulch, or the wood frame of his house].

    Of course, the folks who dropped it let it lay on the ground for the better part of a week before they cut it into segments, and even then, it was too big for us to feed through a splitter.

    And so, we've found the most valuable lesson when getting a tree dropped -- when people say 'sure, I'll take some firewood', they're lying.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  163. Re:Right by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    Can the wheel be encased in eg. a steel rod cage? Something that water can flow through freely but dense enough to screen out the hippos, gators, and floating logs?

  164. Most likely not going to work by CyBlue · · Score: 1

    He says he's between 2 damns on a slow-moving (almost no-moving?) river? The only way a tidal system would work would be to have an incredibly large tank (impractical) or damn up some cove for the water to flow in and out of. That would also require a large rate of fluctuation in river level to keep the water moving in and out of it and 4-6 feet over the course of even daily wouldn't cut it. From what he describes, it wouldn't seem like the river flows fast enough to keep a paddle-wheel going. Basicly, put a 2x6 plank in the water.. if you can hold it in-place just give that idea up because you'd need some ridiculously large paddle-wheel.

    1. Re:Most likely not going to work by CyBlue · · Score: 1

      .. and yes, I misspelled dam. ;-)

  165. Darrin's alternative energy house info by Wilk4 · · Score: 1
    A friend is my sister lives way the heck out in the boonies in Wyoming, and has put in solar and wind systems and has detailed much of his work on the systems, inverter, control, batteries etc.

    Darrin and Andie (see their Alternative Energy House adn System pages)

    While the source isn't hydro, the info on control, etc might be very useful to you, from someone who has actually done it, just just read about doing it.

  166. Store that sells goodies by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

    Check out THIS STORE. Click on the "hydropower" link to the left. They have high flow-low head, low flow-high head, and low volume-low flow hydro-turbines for "home use". I didn't see anyone else post this place but if they have feel free to mod me redundant:P

  167. Tesla Schauberger Turbines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some very interesting possibilities offered by combining tesla bladeless turbines with schauberger vortex turbine designs... the following link offers some ideas for the adventurous:

    http://www.frank.germano.com

  168. Home Power magazine might be helpful by LandGator · · Score: 1

    http://www.homepower.com/

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  169. Would it be stealing? by mi · · Score: 1
    I'm between two large hydro dams, so the water level is fairly constant [...]

    Could someone come and claim, that you are stealing the power from the power company(ies) -- or whatever organization(s), that built the two dams?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  170. Do it all underwater with "furlable" sea anchors by QuietRiot · · Score: 1

    Here's my suggestion. Feel free to ask for details by emailing [cyrus at 80d dot org].

    I have a very rough idea here. Buy or make some sea anchors. Sea anchors are very high drag in the water and are used to limit boat drifting in windy conditions. They are basically a large tapered piece of cloth (like a bucket) with a hole in the bottom. They collect water in a big hole and make it flow through a small hole at the other end. This is just drag in the water. The trick is to make one so that it can be converted between a high-drag and a low-drag state. Pull on one line (at the big opening, via a few connection points) and it's high drag. If you pull the small opening through the middle and release tension on the big opening connection, the material can be forced inside out and will then hopefully offer little resistance. You could also somehow have it move sideways through the water, offering little resistance.

    What you then need to do is have one on each side of a pully type gear mechanism. As the water pulls on the high-drag anchor, you get a chance to make some electricity (ratio gear drive to a generator) while you reel the other one in. Switch modes, put your gear drive in "reverse" and have the other pulled out. This will reel in the opposite anchor as you drive your generator. Rinse and repeat.

    Another option would be to attach a number of these "underwater sails" to a loop. Configure so they pull on one side and are collapsed on the other. This would give you continuous power.

    The anchors should be positioned to be in the highest flow possible. If they float to the top or sink too much you could attach a float or weight (or both) to properly position them under the water.

    All that's left is implementation. I'd be glad to help further with design. This could even work in the winter underneath an icy cover.

    If not to power a generator, you could perhaps power a water pump that would raise the water to a high enough head that you could power a paddle wheel at high velocity. This could be attached to an alternator. You can find plans for these with home power people. Be sure to raise your voltage as high as possible before transmitting it any distance and use the largest diameter cable you can afford. Vdrop at 12 or 24 volts can be very large (relatively), wasting much of your effort.

    Best of luck! Cool project!

  171. You've never been hit in the head by an acorn? by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    I had my leg go numb when struck by a little 3.5cm acorn knocked free of a tree by a pesky little squirrel.

    I've seen a little kid nearly knocked unconcious, bleeding, from a scalp would from another acorn.

    And don't even get me started as to what acorns do to sheetmetal of your vehicle from that height (not to mention squirrles that sometimes do fall).

    It was a hazard... and a very, very painful one at that.

    1. Re:You've never been hit in the head by an acorn? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      He he... Reading the subject, I thought for sure this was a reply in this thread! Acorns... falling squirrels...

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  172. source diversification, cost of running lines, etc by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    So, at 2.4 kilowatt-hours a day, at a cost of $0.08 (say) a kilowatt-hour, you would save over 19 cents a day on electricity, or enough to pay off the generator in 17.1 years.

    You neglected to factor in the cost of running the grid out to your house. It can easily be $30,000. Many off-grid systems aren't off-grid because people want to save money; they're set up because there's no way to get the grid to them. For example, in the mountains a mile up a road where there's no other houses. You think the power company runs the line all the way up to your house for free? Hah.

    Further, a good system balances more than just one source- for example, solar is great until it rains, or night-time. A device like this is perfect for reducing the number of batteries needed to keep the house powered overnight(and big storage batteries are pretty expensive and have to be replaced every few years).

  173. sling pump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    grew up in the southern tier.
    the DEC will eat you alive for what you are thinking.

    do a sling pump, water tower, with a "little otto".