Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 Released

KonijnenBunny writes "May 3rd sees the release of the 0.6 version of Mozilla's Thunderbird e-mail and newsgroup client, featuring improved junk-mail controls and a new brand identity, including a new Firefox-style icon. I switched from some murky client which didn't exactly have a bright outlook regarding spam to Thunderbird a while back and was not dissapointed. Grab this latest version at Mozilla.org." Mac OS X users can also enjoy the new Pinstripe theme, which matches the previous theme of the same name applied to Firefox.

479 comments

  1. So they've not renamed it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would have thought that they would have renamed it to fit in with Firefox. Thunderfox isn't that bad a name, is it?

    1. Re:So they've not renamed it? by Dreadlord · · Score: 1

      I think something like Lightningcow would be much better...

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    2. Re:So they've not renamed it? by jdreed1024 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Thunderfox isn't that bad a name, is it?

      Not bad. But I think the male geeks out there need something a little more manly. Like, say, ThunderCougarFalconBird.

      Car Salesman: Spotted her the moment you came in, didn't you? She's a real beauty.
      Fry: Yup, she's beautiful coffee alright.
      Salesman: No, the Ford ThunderCougarFalconBird! Nothing makes you feel more like a man than a ThunderCougarFalconBird! So how much were you thinking of spending on this ThunderCougarFalconBird?
      Fry: Sorry, I'm not here to buy.
      Salesman: I understand, and it's great that you don't care if anyone questions your sexual orientation.
      Fry: I care! I care plenty! I just don't know how to make them stop!
      Salesman: One word: ThunderCougarFalconBird.
      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    3. Re:So they've not renamed it? by FattMattP · · Score: 5, Funny

      Continuing with the creatures of the forest theme (bird, fox) I nominate Thunderbunny as the new name.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    4. Re:So they've not renamed it? by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      yeah but what if Firefox is renamed Firethighs, then you'd be in trouble.

    5. Re:So they've not renamed it? by Sevn · · Score: 1

      Man, lets just hope they change the name fast before Ford gets wind of it.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    6. Re:So they've not renamed it? by Spunk · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are clearly in need of the Firesomething plugin!

      I'm certainly pleased with Mozilla Lightningwhale.
      new window
      Mozilla Moonbadger.
      new window
      Mozilla Moonstarfish.

    7. Re:So they've not renamed it? by WanChan · · Score: 1

      firefox. thunderbird. seamonkey. apparent trend.

    8. Re:So they've not renamed it? by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      I'd wait for Phoenix^H^H^H^H^HFireBird^H^H^H^HFox to get renamed a few more times before renaming anything else to match.

      Me, I stay ahead of the namegame, I'm using "Firesomething" from Cosmic Cat Creations to automatically rename Firequail to a new animal every time I start it

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    9. Re:So they've not renamed it? by WanChan · · Score: 2, Funny

      following the Seamonkey/Thunderbird/Firefox theme (element, animal), is it time to add one well known outlook feature? Ladies and gentlemen: Earthworm.

    10. Re:So they've not renamed it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Thunderbird was chosen just to match Firebird, I think they should move it back to its previous name, Minotaur.

    11. Re:So they've not renamed it? by adamjaskie · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about Thundercat?

      Thunder Thunder! THUNDERCATS!!!!

      HOO-OOOOOOO!

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    12. Re:So they've not renamed it? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Pah. Use something with real power. Like Mozthulhu Starsquid or Moz-sothoth Moongoat.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    13. Re:So they've not renamed it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I nominate madcow

    14. Re:So they've not renamed it? by pmike_bauer · · Score: 1

      Rainfox?

      --
      I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    15. Re:So they've not renamed it? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I nominate Thunderbunny as the new name.

      At one point I actually suggested Screaming Flaming Rabbit.
      (I was only halfway serious, though.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    16. Re:So they've not renamed it? by Kyouryuu · · Score: 1

      They are just waiting until the next renaming of Firefox.

    17. Re:So they've not renamed it? by dr_davel · · Score: 2, Funny

      One word: Thunderpants.

      --
      Never eat anything bigger than your head.
    18. Re:So they've not renamed it? by magefile · · Score: 1

      To me, it would make more sense if they renamed it with the first word being the "core" (Fire) and the second word being the same - "bird". Like, different animals, but with a firey theme. 'Course, I believe there's already a conflict for Firebird ...

    19. Re:So they've not renamed it? by WCityMike · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. You missed the point. Firefox. Each syllable starts with a 'f.'

      So, the obvious one would be to use a word with a similar construction, while not dumping the 'thunder' part.

      I present to you ... Mozilla Thunderthighs.

    20. Re:So they've not renamed it? by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      How about Thunderthrush? Has a nice ring to it, and fits both the alliterative and the semantic element-animal themes.

      Or are there any elements beginning with 'b'? And don't give me Beryllium!

    21. Re:So they've not renamed it? by uberjoe · · Score: 1

      Firebird was renamed due to copyright issues with another browser named 'firebird.' Since the mozilla people have not reanamed thunderbird, I will assume there is not a similarily named mail project.

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    22. Re:So they've not renamed it? by tutwabee · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that they would have renamed it to fit in with Firefox. Thunderfox isn't that bad a name, is it?

      Actually that may confuse people. Firebird and Thunderbird already had names that were too similar. Many people I know would catch themselves saying Thunderbird when they meant Firebird and visa versa.

  2. New logo by kronak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just think the new logo looks way cooler than the old one

    1. Re:New logo by ospirata · · Score: 2, Funny

      I liked the new logo either.
      And the time I learn how to compile it on AmigaOS I guess I'll reallly start to love Thunderbird

    2. Re:New logo by cetan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's a shame that as a small icon it looks terrible.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    3. Re:New logo by cronot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Too bad these also are trademarked. Debian can't use it because apparently it would violate the DFSG (Some threads about it) , so I have to stick with Debian's build of Firefox and Thunderbird that has crappy icons and logos.

    4. Re:New logo by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      But they forgot to increase the version number in the new logo! (help->about)

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    5. Re:New logo by faust2097 · · Score: 1

      It's not that bad when it's small, just pretend it's Megaman's head.

    6. Re:New logo by xandroid · · Score: 1

      I recently emailed Mozilla's licensing department about using derivative works of their icons. The response I received included this: "the image files are not under the same open source license as the rest of Mozilla. The reason for this is that it helps us preserve the clarity of our trademark."

      Fine with me; I can GIMP up the icons on the web site and use them myself as fair use. You should consider doing the same.

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
    7. Re:New logo by cronot · · Score: 1

      I recently emailed Mozilla's licensing department about using derivative works of their icons. The response I received included this: "the image files are not under the same open source license as the rest of Mozilla. The reason for this is that it helps us preserve the clarity of our trademark."

      Wouldn't that mean that Debian's issue with it is moot?

      Fine with me; I can GIMP up the icons on the web site and use them myself as fair use. You should consider doing the same.

      I thought about that, but then I could save time and just grab someone else's work - Actually I prefer the Firefox original icon, but the ones on that link are still way better than the ones distributed by Debian, to this date. BTW, this link was posted on Debian's maillist as a sugestion for the icon to replace the official one, and though the License is DFSG-Free (except maybe for the "firefox_old" icon, which is clearly derivative work), Debian is still sticking with that blue-globe crap icon. Go figure...

  3. Murky by Poster+Nutbag · · Score: 5, Funny

    I switched from some murky client which didn't exactly have a bright outlook regarding spam

    That's geekspeak for Outlook Express, if I remember.

    1. Re:Murky by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's geekspeak for Outlook Express

      No, a true geek refers to it as Outbreak Express

    2. Re:Murky by martingunnarsson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd say true geeks use the correct names for companies and their products.

      --
      Martin
    3. Re:Murky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > No, a true geek refers to it as Outbreak Express

      You also laugh hysterically whenever some comedic genius says "mikey$oft", right?

    4. Re:Murky by mbbac · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I worked at Microsoft we called it Lookout.

      --

      mbbac

    5. Re:Murky by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, a true geek refers to it as Outbreak Express
      I thought it was more like Lookout Distress or something like that.
      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    6. Re:Murky by dreadlocks · · Score: 1

      I call it "Outhouse" ... I guess "Outhouse Express" works as well, but to me it would then imply some sort of quick service. Maybe used for emergencies only, eh?

    7. Re:Murky by sydb · · Score: 1

      That's nerds, not geeks.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    8. Re:Murky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      na, a really geek(nix) calls it LookOut!

    9. Re:Murky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same fucking thing. Nerd = geek, geek = nerd.

    10. Re:Murky by mike_sucks · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You = clueless.

      --
      -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
    11. Re:Murky by alexborges · · Score: 1

      mbbac:

      You have just broken the evil NDA's and NCA's you signed with the borg.

      Prepare to be re-assimilated.

      --
      NO SIG
    12. Re:Murky by Plutor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess that means that you guys didn't use Lookout, the single most useful plugin for Outlook. Since I'm forced to use it at work, at least Lookout makes it useful. Searching for old emails with Lookout is as easy as I can only assume GMail will be.

      And I'm not even kidding.

    13. Re:Murky by festers · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      you = humorless

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    14. Re:Murky by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      No, true geeks use correct names for companies and thier products WITH VERSION AND REVISION NUMBERS.

    15. Re:Murky by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      no, true geeks bite the heads off of chickens.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    16. Re:Murky by mibus · · Score: 1

      Nah he's talking about the Express one. Lookout is a totally separate product from Outbreak Express.

    17. Re:Murky by mike_sucks · · Score: 1

      you = smell

      --
      -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
  4. Pinstripe Theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it the garish pinstripe theme of old or the new, improved, and subdued pinstripe of Panther?

    1. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by bwy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know the answer to this, but it does make me wonder something else.

      How many folks on a Mac are really interested in using anything other than Safari and Mail? Camino, Mozilla, Firefox, etc. all run comparatively slow on my G4 iBook. Clearly a lot of optimizations have occured to make the "native" Panther apps run quickly. And they all integrate fairly nice together and have good feature sets so I just really don't see any incentive to change. It is just a question for you guys, would be curious to get some feedback.

      Win32 is another story. The default mail and browser suck royal ass. And, Mozilla and friends run nicely.

    2. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      I am like you. Mail.app does a great job of blending multiple accounts into one inbox, yet letting you differentiate. Junk mail controls are pretty good too.

      Safari is just OK, though. I'd like to be able to change the toolbar, and edit MIME types though. Other than that I still click on it for surfing, since it's very quick and the tab handling is quite good.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    3. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right. If you're on a Mac, use the Mac apps, they're solid. Mozilla runs best on Win32, no bones about it. Given that, I just wish it had a plain-jane Win32 interface instead of the current UI they insist on peddling. Would make it perfect! But noooo, it's gotta be x-platform, and it's gotta have themes *rolls eyes*.

      A system's default browser is usually the best choice. I don't see myself upgrading from WinXP for a long time tho, which means I'll be stuck with IE6 according to MS's policy, which means I'll be using Mozilla for a long time to come :)

    4. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Red+Leader. · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I for one am not completely satisfied with Safari and Mail and use Thunderbird and Mozilla in OS X (I know I should use Firefox, but just don't, okay?). For the record, I have an iBook G3 900 and the software doesn't seem too slow.
      1. Mail.app's handling of multiple mailboxes is horrendous - it puts all the mail from multiple inboxes into ONE inbox! Holy cow, Batman, which acid monkey dreamed that one up?
      2. Safari's right-click menus are generally useless. The options are poor and they seemed to have chosen different labels just to be different. When you right click in Mozilla, the options are ordered well (most importantly 'back' is right at the top) and textually make better sense to me.
      3. Mail.app opens too many simultaneous connections. I had to alter my Courier IMAP server to allow 16 connections per IP in order to get my mail. What would happen if I didn't run my own server? No mail.
      4. If Thunderbird would let you have multiple accounts with the same server I'd be totally happy. This is especially important for when you're accessing various IMAP stores through SSH - all the servers become localhost!
    5. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work we're on a pretty tight budget, and so we haven't upgraded to Panther yet. No real big need to. Meanwhile our doofus IT guy switched over to an Exchange mail server, which Jaguar's Mail.app can't access. Thunderbird seems to be the next best alternative.

    6. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by rackbreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I switched from using Win/Outlook Express to Mac/Mail, the feature I missed most was the ability to forward html emails intact as I received them.

      One of my websites takes user input in a form, and e-mails the results in an html table. Sometimes, I need to forward these messages to other people. With OE, this was no problem. But Mail would convert the forwarded messages to text-only, stripping out all the table code in the process.

      I wasn't able to find a fix for this, so I switched to Thunderbird for its excellent html support. It works well for the most part, although there are some annoying Mozilla quirks (separate inbox required for each account, for example) and the bugs that come along with its "technology preview" status. I also miss some of the integration that Mail offers (with Address Book, iPhoto, etc.)

    7. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Noordijk · · Score: 1

      I find thunderbird less flaky than Mail, and it lets me send HTML emails. This release also got rid of an error that had been happening when Thunderbird was launched by a browser or other app. The only (for me) remaining wishes are sending pictures from iPhoto directly, and integration/syncing with Address Book (although iAddressX, which is indispesable, sort of alleviates that by keeping addresses easily accessable).

    8. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by zhenlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pinstripe will use the OS to render widgets and backgrounds and such, so it will match the OS. Therefore, you will get garish pinstripes in OS X 10.3.

    9. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by bwy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mail.app's handling of multiple mailboxes is horrendous - it puts all the mail from multiple inboxes into ONE inbox! Holy cow, Batman, which acid monkey dreamed that one up?

      Hmmm... I'm running Mail 1.3.4 and have 4 inboxes, one for each mail POP3 account (3 are on one server, the fourth is a different server). Now, the way it looks visually, the 4 individual inboxes are listed UNDER a parent "Inbox", but there are actually 4 separate inboxes underneath it. Are we talking about the same thing?

      I like the ease of being able to take an account offline by right clicking on an inbox icon. Most of the time I want my desktop receiving work email and don't want the iBook butting in, however when I'm off site with the iBook for work purposes I can have Mail fetch my messages.

    10. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      I wasn't able to find a fix for this, so I switched to Thunderbird for its excellent html support. It works well for the most part, although there are some annoying Mozilla quirks (separate inbox required for each account, for example)

      Personally, I love the fact that mozilla has a different inbox for every account. It makes it real easy to do a very rough presorting of all my mail. I use different email accounts for different purposes. I guess if you wanted to, you could setup mozilla to forward all messages to one account on delivery, but to me, that seems like a waste of a good prefilter.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    11. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by jest3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use Safari for Web and Thunderbird for Mail.

      The new .6 release of Thunderbird is really fast on my 12" G4 Powerbook and looks great too. Its multiple email account management is much better than the Apple Mail.app IMHO. It also has better support for sending and displaying HTML mail.

      You can make Safari be friendly with Thunderbird (ie. Email links open into Thunderbird) by going to the Apple Mail.app and under Preferences setting Thunderbird as the Default MailApplication. Kind of obfuscated by Apple on purpose I am sure ...

    12. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What version of Mail.app are you using? I'm on Panther here with Mail.app version 1.3.7 (v615/613), two different E-mail accounts set up, and I'm seeing three inboxes. One for my first E-mail address, one for my second, and a big master inbox that combines both of them. I think it's nice to have a sort of "Library", as it were, for all of my E-mail.

      I don't see how View Source, Save Page As..., and Print Page... (the three I get while posting this comment) are useless or labeled differently at all. I prefer Back to be a key chord, since I don't like contextual menus in the first place. I can't imagine a legitimate reason for navigation commands to be in one unless they have no key chords or buttons.

    13. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      While Safari used to be painfully slow on my G4/450 with OS X 10.3, Firebird/-fox/-whatsoever was fine, so I used that.

    14. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 1

      Safari has nearly no developer tools, which makes it a clear no go on web development, where as firebird has:

      PHN Toolbar
      JavaScript Console
      DOM Viewer
      Venkman
      UserAgent Toolbar
      MyCroft search plug-ins (PHP documentation at a cmd-k)
      Colorized view source

      Safari is awesome, as long as you don't want to do development in it.

    15. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a firstgen AlBook, so it's pretty fast.

      I use Firefox exclusively as a web browser now.
      When I first got the AlBook, I used a combination of Camino and Safari. Camino's stable version is horrendously old, and I've had issues with the nightlies. Safari isn't 100% there with its rendering engine (although it is very good in most cases) especially of XHTML and handling alternative style sheets. It also lacks quite a few features that FireFox/Mozilla have.

      Mail.app doesn't seem to support subscriptions in IMAP. This royally sucks and I won't use it because of this. I don't want it telling me when I have new mail in my spam folders--I don't even want to see them.

      I've been trying thunderbird off and on, but I can only use the versions with support for Enigmail so I need to check if that's been updated. From my initial glance though, .6 appears to be much improved from .5 or even the last nightly I looked at not too long ago. IDLE support was one of the things I always missed, especially because frequent polling of lots of folders seemed to make it confused and stop checking mail at all ... I need to check to see if this is resolved (and if not ... finally post a bug ...). I used squirrelmail for a while, but currently use mutt primariliy..

    16. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1

      I use Firefox on my G4/1.25G Powerbook and G3/500 iBook because Safari is actively hostile to bookmark portability unless you have a .Mac subscription.

      I use Thunderbird because Mail.app runs like a pregnant water buffalo in deep mud. I also despise Mail.app's slide-out drawer.

    17. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the Mail and Safari apps on macs, but they lack some more advanced features like (for Mail) IMAPS etc... At least last time I checked...
      So sure the Mozilla Suite apps might start a little bit slower, but for the extra features that I do use, I prefer those apps...

    18. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by alexborges · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Im sorry.... ive to go on record about this....

      OSX's mail app is a TOY, just like safari is a TOY.

      In my work, i depend on keeping about 20,000 emails in my inbox (yeah, all of those are mine).
      I work on web based apps and i also depend on a decent browser that can do tabbed browsing in a scalable manner (say, 8 windows, 20 tabs open each)...

      All of that at the same time in a 400mhz tibook laptop with 384MB RAM

      The only thing ive seen that can handle this is debianppc, self compiled optimized libc6, same for the kernel, some hdparm optimizations, and mozilla thunderbird+mozilla firebird ( cant have the gnome stuff cause epiphany does not have the niceties firefox has, and evo keeps crashing like a stupid bitch on ppc)

      --
      NO SIG
    19. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by dn15 · · Score: 1

      OK, so this is probably redundant.

      I use Firefox and Thunderbird (had been using the Suite mostly, though.) I prefer Mozilla apps because of the features they offer. As someone already mentioned, there are more options for cookie management in Firefox. As for Thunderbird, I prefer the way it handles IMAP accounts. My main complaint about it was the lack of Dock icon notification for new messages, but as of Thunderbird 0.6 that's no longer an issue. The interfaces for Safari and Mail do feel better in many ways because they are native, but that doesn't mean much if they simply don't do everything I want.

      Also, I in no way mean to degrade these two programs. Both are fine apps and I wouldn't have any problem recommending them to people who have different needs. My family uses Safari and Mail and I'm in no hurry to switch them away.

    20. Re:Pinstripe Theme? by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      How many folks on a Mac are really interested in using anything other than Safari and Mail?

      My father (who has lived and breathed Apple-evangelism since the original Apple ][) has one of those silver OSX notebooks, and since I was forced to use it one day I downloaded the then Firebird to surf with. I mentioned it to him in passing that the dmg was sitting on the desktop, as I expected that he'd want to delete it - I didn't suggest that he use it as I well know his resiliance to anything non-Apple ....

      About a month ago he surprised me by telling me proudly how he'd upgraded to the latest version of Firefox :))

  5. Background on the logo/icon design by sgarrity · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a great post by Jon Hick's about the design process for the new icon/logo.

    Jon has been helping us with the visual identity work on Firefox and Thunderbird and doing some really great work.

    Keep in mind, the artwork will continue to improve. Two issues we are particularly focused on improving are the small versions of the icons, and the visual consistency between the Firefox and the Thunderbird icons.

    1. Re:Background on the logo/icon design by kbmccarty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Will the new Thunderbird icons be made available under the same license as the Firefox icons? There unfortunately seem to be some issues with using them in the packages provided by various Linux distributions; please see this thread for details:

      Debian Legal thread on Firefox trademark issues
      --
      - Kevin B. McCarty
    2. Re:Background on the logo/icon design by sgarrity · · Score: 1

      I think it will work the same way as the Firefox artwork. We don't yet have the generic 'unofficial' artwork done for Thunderbird yet though.

    3. Re:Background on the logo/icon design by danharan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Great work on the design!

      Now, I have a question as far as default settings. Why is spam filtering not enabled by default?

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    4. Re:Background on the logo/icon design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the OSS-zealots going to protest that Jon used Illustrator on MacOS X instead of OSS software to make the icon?

    5. Re:Background on the logo/icon design by endx7 · · Score: 1

      Two issues we are particularly focused on improving are the small versions of the icons, ...

      The small version of the firefox icon looks like a glove (or it does to me at least).

  6. Sluggishness by gspr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't mean to start a flamewar, but KMail REALLY does seem a lot more responsive (especially when manuevering about in the pulldown menus) than Thunderbird. Do you agree? If not, could I have done something wrong at some point?

    1. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i wouldn't blame thunderbird, I find that with all GTK apps and have done ever since they went 2.0.

      QT3 seems faster and better, GTK 2.0 seems better but slower.

      good spam filter advice with kmail here
      http://www.softwaredesign.co.uk/Information. SpamFi lters.html

    2. Re:Sluggishness by Azureflare · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Absolutely. I use kmail, and I really wanted to start using Thunderbird, because I use firefox all the time, and REALLY want to get away from KDE (I'm using XFce right now). Well, kmail still wins hands down; thunderbird is really way too slow, the menus are sluggish, new emails take forever to open (On a AMD 2200+). Granted, I haven't tried thunderbird 0.6 yet. I'll have to give it a try, maybe once it gets on mandrake cooker I'll rebuild it.

      I like kmail a lot, I just wish it wasn't so bloated with all the kde stuff. I only use a few kde apps.... kdevelop, quanta, kmail...

      I could replace those with GTK apps (anjuta, bluefish, evolution or thunderbird), but I really like the responsiveness of the qt applications. I like the gtk apps, but as long as I'm using kmail, I might as well just use the kde apps.

      Actually I'm a long time user of evolution. I would still be using it, if I hadn't one day corrupted my inbox by moving it to itself, and then trying to restore it...and erasing all my emails in my inbox. I still don't know how I did it. But I do regular backups every day now, just in case. I probably could go back to evolution... But the icons in evolution are just so BORING. I wish Ximian would release some Official icon sets, or at least have an official way to customize the icons of Evolution, like Thunderbird does. Then I'd probably go back to evolution. (as you can tell I hate the icons in evolution). Why doesn't Ximian add support like this? I've tried the crystal icon hack for evolution, but it doesn't get all the icons, and ends up looking messy.

    3. Re:Sluggishness by Palshife · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, there's no KMail build for Windows, so I wouldn't really know.

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    4. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, as of not too long ago (a month maybe?), Evolution switched over to using the gtk icon theme stuff so what you want is now possible (where next stable release is 2.0).

    5. Re:Sluggishness by Azureflare · · Score: 5, Informative
      Sorry for replying twice, but I felt I should do so in the circumstances. I previously posted about how I'm still use kmail, and I think kmail is more responsive than thunderbird.

      I just tried thunderbird 0.6. Let me say... Thunderbird 0.6 is VASTLY improved over 0.5. I don't know if it's because this isn't a packaged rpm, but the menus are SO much more responsive than 0.5. Opening a new email takes almost no time at all. I must say, 0.6 is a great improvement over 0.5. I think I may just move over to Thunderbird now, especially since I just found an extension for Mozilla Calendar for Thunderbird.

    6. Re:Sluggishness by Pengo · · Score: 1


      I use thunderbird as my primary email client for imap. It seems to do quite well, most of the places I use it is on Windows. I still use the Mac Mail app on my mac.

      The windows seem fine, I don't notice any slugishness , but I am on a reasonably spec'd high end machine. It also seems that the windows builds are a little more zippy for menu's. Not sure why that is, don't really care.

    7. Re:Sluggishness by twbecker · · Score: 1

      Hmm, this must be specific to Linux builds. I've used TB on XP since .4, and while I certainly have upgraded to the latest and greatest (or will I should say, I'm technically still on .6 RC2), I haven't noticed any huge strides in performance. Of course, I've never noticed TB to be particularly sluggish anyway.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    8. Re:Sluggishness by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      KMail pissed me off so much recently that I wrote a little comparison of common Unix email clients. What irritates me is that KMail is so close to being my ideal GUI client, but they completely dropped the ball on some critical features. Namely:
      • I want a button to hide read messages. It seems like every other client on the planet does this, but not KMail. I read a lot of mailing lists, and I don't want to see the 10,000 messages in debian-user from 6 months ago.
      • IMAP filtering. Here, let me say that again: IMAP filtering. The Bayesian trainer on my email server works by reading messages in a particular folder in each user's IMAP setup and passing each of them into Spamassassin's trainer. Every single client I've used makes it easy to set filters so that I can mark a lot of messages in my inbox as spam, run one filter, and have all of them moved into INBOX.spam.train.spam - each, that is, but KMail. In a corporate environment where the admins want us to leave mail on the server for backup purposes, this is a deal-breaker. Sure, I can manually move messages around by clicking-and-dragging, but that just ain't gonna happen.

      If KMail otherwise sucked, I wouldn't care. However, it's obvious that they put a lot of time into making it a really nice client, except for the absolute critical flaws that make it worthless to a lot of people. I'll keep trying it each time a new version comes out; if they can fix these problems, I'll switch in a heartbeat. Until then, I'm staying with Emacs/Gnus.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Egh, just found out I'll have to wait for mozilla to make a calendar extension specifically for Thunderbird 0.6. Tried the one for Thunderbird 0.5, and it wasn't able to load properly... Then I found out I have to have an extension made specifically for the build I'm using. Guess this is so fresh, even Mozilla hasn't caught up yet!

    10. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mean to start a flamewar,

      No, you meant plug your favourite mail client... why don't you KDE/Gentoo zealots just fuck off and bother someone else with your constant squealing zealotry.

    11. Re:Sluggishness by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      I would agree if :

      1. Threading would not suck so bad in Kmail

      2. It would do PGP/MIME instead of signing inline (yuck!).

      Enigmail is a big plus for Mozilla Mail/Thunderbird.

      --
      :wq
    12. Re:Sluggishness by nfsilkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny. I am seeing the opposite.

      On a P4 2.4 running Gentoo, KMail began its run well. Over time it developed into a sluggish, buggy mess. Sluggish in the sense that it would take eons to parse my ~36 mbox-based imap folders, even when I am local to the mail server. Buggy in that it would cache valid outbound messages in "Local Folders", "Sent Mail" as unreadable, unusable messages. A side-effect of my having KMail store sent messages in "sent-mail" in my imap tree? Who knows.

      Thunderbird, since 0.3 under both Windows and Linux, has flown wonderfully. It did as well under 0.5 also. It appears that 0.6 (as of this morning ;) will repeat this level of performance.

      What impresses me is the ability of TBird to perform so well under Windows as opposed to the cygwin/KDE/Kmail hack. This means that all of my "support-calls" for family and friends drastically decreased since mozilla has provided a legit alternative to the recreational home-user over Lookout Distress. :)

      My $0.02.

    13. Re:Sluggishness by Azureflare · · Score: 1
      Wow. Looks like you've got a flamewar going on... IN YOUR OWN HEAD.

      "KDE rocks!"

      "No it doesn't, it's bloated!"

      "GTK is too sluggish and boring!"

      etc. etc...

      My friend, I suggest it is time for you to seek out a professional psychologist. I pray it is not too late.

    14. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh shit, I meant to post that as AC... Oh dear, my secret's out, I recommend going to psychologists to myself....

      *sigh* Kill me now. It's finals week.

    15. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are such a dumbass and a karma-whore.

    16. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried the calender extension last night. Get the nightly build, it worked for my Windows version of Thunderbird .6

    17. Re:Sluggishness by Azureflare · · Score: 1
      Hey, Whaddya know, it works just fine!

      Thanks a lot, mr. anonymous.

    18. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't comment on most Linux builds of Thunderbird, because I usually run it on Windows (Athlon 1600+), but the menus are as fast for me as any other windows app. Loading a new mail message is nearly instant. I just mention this because I don't think your experiences are representative of most people's, and I don't want your comments to turn people off from a great email client.

      Peter

    19. Re:Sluggishness by tokul · · Score: 1

      Add * Maildir format that is not atomic

    20. Re:Sluggishness by prandal · · Score: 1

      It is as slow as a dog (not a greyhound) under Windows on my K6-2/500 box. The Spam classifying code needs a few strategic yield()s (or the windoze equivalent) in there too, because it kills everything dead whils running through the newly downloaded emails.

      Phil

    21. Re:Sluggishness by tyrione · · Score: 1
      Depends.

      IMAP support in Thunderbird stomps all over KMail. Whenever the hell KDE gets around to filtering on IMAP folders than I'll use it for Dev Listings, etc.

      TLS Certs Management configuration absolutely blows in KMail, but that's a separate issue. If I run PIII with a fraction of the speed the adjacent poster with his AMD has running I've got to question his configuration. Thunderbird runs just fine on Debian Sid. And I'm not on DSL or greater, but a freakin' dial-up, unfortunately.

    22. Re:Sluggishness by kusanagi374 · · Score: 1

      maybe once it gets on mandrake cooker I'll rebuild it.

      Oh, Mandrake eh? I see what's wrong. It's the rpm subsystem that screwed up everything!

      ... sorry, couldn't resist. This isn't /. without rpm bashing :P

    23. Re:Sluggishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You suck!

  7. Final change yet? by Azghoul · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Will this be the last major change in the "branding" of thunderfoxbird?

    All this talk by the mozilla people about "branding" makes me cry. I hear way too much of this from UE people at IBM... enough to drive a guy mad, I tell you...

    (not to mention, how many times can you change the look and feel -- errrrrr branding, sorry -- of a product before people start looking elsewhere? Or get lost?

    1. Re:Final change yet? by twbecker · · Score: 1

      Considering Thunderbird is still very much a beta (at least as far as the version number is concerned), I'd say they still have time to change it again if they deemed it necessary. Part of the overall polish of any application is look and feel. People won't use it if it doesn't look good. And it doesn't take an expert to notice that the icons, artwork, etc in pre .6 Thunderbird were not up to spec. Considering the type of user that TB is attracting at it's 1.0 state, I don't think anyone's going to be "lost" by the changes.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    2. Re:Final change yet? by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with them changing the l&f in advance of 1.0, or heck, even after.

      I just wonder about the veracity of continually making significant changes, calling it "rebranding" as their NYC image consultants, and generally sounding like they just can't make up their minds what they want their app to be.

      Maybe I'm just aggravated by the use of the marketing term "rebranding"... :)

  8. Is there hope for Mozilla? by Accord+MT · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If there is any hope for a standards-compliant World Wide Web, it lies in the website developers. Yes, that means you! Users are not going to witch to a standards-compiliant browser if they don't need to. Managers are not going to want to support standards if their users wont switch. And certainly Microsoft is not going to change IE. It's up to you, web developers: You have the
    power to change things.

    If you work on a for-profit site, make every reasonable attempt to resist your manager's urging to violate the standard in favor of IE. Do whatever you can get away with without being fired! At the very least, validate your HTML and test on standards-compliant browsers. Try to win your boss over away from the "we're a Microsoft Partner" way of thinking! Show him that everytime you violate the standard to appease IE, you are taking money out of your pocket and giving it to Microsoft, and are moving one step closer to a Microsoft-only Internet, complete with Microsoft-only viruses and trojans.

    If you work on a not-for-profit website or if you're the boss, then you have no excuse. Don't make any consessions for IE. In fact, turn IE users away at the door. Put up some links for them to get with the program and download a standards-compliant browser. The more popular your site is, the more effective it will be if you refuse to serve IE. Microsoft wants an IE-only web, so lets give them a web that blacklists IE. As users start to ditch IE (and they will if they want to see your site), we'll see a snobwall-effect: More people will use standards-compliant browsers, and more sites will have to shape up and support them.

    We can't wait for the users to suddenly switch to standards-compliant browsers. Likewise we can't wait for web site managers to get a clue. It's up to you, developers. You who are in the trenches every day, creating tomorrow's websites. You have the power to make the World Wide Web--and in effect, the entire Internet--standards compliant once again!

    1. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by Finuvir · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's all good stuff, but Thenderbird is a mail client!

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    2. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by clontzman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Try to win your boss over away from the "we're a Microsoft Partner" way of thinking! Show him that everytime you violate the standard to appease IE, you are taking money out of your pocket and giving it to Microsoft, and are moving one step closer to a Microsoft-only Internet, complete with Microsoft-only viruses and trojans.

      While I agree with your general concept (which I think is that standards are a good thing and we shouldn't use browser-specific extensions on public-facing Web sites), I don't really understand how making sure sites work in the browser that 90% of my customers use "takes money out of my pocket and gives it to Microsoft." If my customers can't get to my content, they keep their money to themselves and spend it elsewhere.

      Don't make any consessions for IE. In fact, turn IE users away at the door. Put up some links for them to get with the program and download a standards-compliant browser.

      Uh, dude. C'mon. I really think you've gone over the hedge here. People don't want to be hassled when they go to a Web site -- they just want it to work. I'm all for making sure things work in Moz, Safari, etc., but most bosses rightly won't let their employees turn their Web sites into some kind of crusade for the software they prefer.

    3. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by Kosgrove · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Frankly, I don't care if anyone bothers to mod the parent down but that's a troll, you retards. If you sincerely think it's okay to undermine your boss' direction because of your political agenda against MS, maybe you should reconsider why you're unemployed and have so much time to moderate on Slashdot.

      Not to mention that it's off-topic.

      Props to Accord MT for writing something that was just believbale enough.

    4. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by next1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      well said. i'm in the for-profit category, so in practice, i can't actually turn people away at the door ;-)
      however, we ensure our html is standards compliant and support ALL major browsers - the days of every site saying "we only support ie and netscape" are long gone (as far as i'm concerned anyway).
      we support mozilla/firefox, ie, opera, netscape, safari, konqueror (think that's it!) on all applicable platforms.

      mozilla have given us the browser and now developers can play their part in turning things around.

    5. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "If you work on a for-profit site, make every reasonable attempt to resist your manager's urging to violate the standard in favor of IE. Do whatever you can get away with without being fired!"

      More to the point:

      "Hi, I'm from [companyname] and we're trying to find [large quantities of some electronic product]. I've just been to your website and it says my browser isn't supported. Is there something you can do? No, it's not possible to use Internet Explorer on my computer. Really? I should get a Windows computer? So should I put you down as unable to supply [product name] then?

    6. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I don't really understand how making sure sites work in the browser that 90% of my customers use "takes money out of my pocket and gives it to Microsoft.""

      Yep, the money's not really going to microsoft is it, so much as to your competitors. But, for anyone who gets the 90% argument from their boss:

      "Designing for 90% of browsers is our policy? Here's a question. If I answered 10% of the sales calls with "hello [companyname], could you please fuck off", how would that affect our sales?"

      "Now imagine if our website gave that same impression to 10% of customers"

    7. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by sehryan · · Score: 1

      Jesus people. This isn't an Either/Or situation. You can code great looking, highly functional websites that work in both IE and Moz.

      If your Web Designer/Developer can't do this, then you have employee problems, not technology problems.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    8. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by danharan · · Score: 1
      "Designing for 90% of browsers is our policy? Here's a question. If I answered 10% of the sales calls with "hello [companyname], could you please fuck off", how would that affect our sales?"

      You had better release that as public domain, cause I intend to use that in my sales pitches! :)
      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    9. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "You had better release that as public domain, cause I intend to use that in my sales pitches!"

      But if you modify it, you have to release the source code!

      At work, we've just decided on a completely Flash website (it even has an intro page, eww!) which doesn't even work on most Windows computers, let alone real computers. Who knows how many people visit the site, rather than just leaving at the first page (nobody's keeping logs) -- and it's so bad that I'm not offering to maintain the site because it would be too embarassing to be associated with. But the boss loves it. Much more "professional" than that old website (which was identical, but in HTML)

    10. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now imagine if our website gave that same impression to 10% of customers

      Not just any 10% of customers. Often it's the truly internet savvy users and/or people who know the score that are using the standards compliant browsers.

      Turning away 10% of your customers is bad, but when that 10% is likely to be highly correlated to the smartest 10% of your customer base, you're in real trouble.

    11. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At work, we've just decided on a completely Flash website

      I won't be able to use it then. I'll also steer people away from it, if I find out what site it is.

      I've often wondered what retardation causes people to design sites like Fuji's and Cartoon Network's awful sites. Now I know that it's idiot managers.

    12. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by danharan · · Score: 1

      I've seen some great, nifty looking sites in Flash- with not a single word indexed in the search engines.

      OOPS!

      But if they're not keeping logs, nobody has a clue anyway. Oh well...

      Your approach- not be associated with the site- is probably the best plan of (in)action. It's no good having crap on record / in the portfolio.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    13. Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Turning away 10% of your customers is bad, but when that 10% is likely to be highly correlated to the smartest 10% of your customer base, you're in real trouble."

      People who buy the $1M pieces of kit aren't smart enough to use good browsers -- I know plenty of them whose machines are so full of spyware that it would probably be trivial to remove confidential information from them remotely.

      "We have a firewall therefore we're completely safe from anything"

  9. Any optimisations? by prog99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still feel it chugs along a bit slowly at times...

    I use it at home on gentoo box and it feels sluggish compared with the outlook client I use at work on a machine with a much lower spec.

    I guess I'll be waiting for it to meander its way onto portage at some point.

    1. Re:Any optimisations? by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1

      I've found it quite fast for newsreading on OS X. The new theme looks very sweet, btw.

    2. Re:Any optimisations? by kronak · · Score: 0

      if you update your portage tree, it might already be there. I know its there on mine.

      And yes, it is running much faster now.

    3. Re:Any optimisations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous versions (and Mozilla) have a tendency to randomly crash in Windows. I'd rather this be addressed then speed, or what pretty themes are available this week.

      Even on Linux, Mozilla/Firefox/Galeon/etc have problems, and Konqueror doesn't work with a lot of IE-centric pages. Really only Opera seems to work as well as IE across the pages you actually find on the web. It's a bit sad, really.

    4. Re:Any optimisations? by joaorf · · Score: 1
      My experience is opposite: Thunderbird takes half the time of Outlook Express to start up on my machine.

      Anyway, it's sad you use that virus magnet called Outlook on your work computer.

  10. 5....4....3...2..1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thunderbirds are GO!

    Sorry couldn't resist it.

    1. Re:5....4....3...2..1 by Simon+Lyngshede · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try to look at the "About" box, choose "credits", that line is actually included in Thunderbird.

  11. Thunderbird by stateofmind · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I love thunderbird, if I was on any other OS other then WinXP, I would use it. Except when it comes down to Thunderbird vs. Outlook Express, I'll take OE for speed.

    Thunderbird is written in Java (correct me if I'm wrong), and can be terribly slow. That's the only reason OE wins, otherwise I would go for Thunderbird, it can just be painfully slow for me. But that goes for Java apps in general.

    BTW, does Thunderbird use SWT or Swing? I know I'm being lazy, and could check for myself, just asking.

    I love the work Mozilla has done so far, Firefox alone is great.

    Did anyone see the article in The Wallstreet Journal back in January? Walt Mossberg praised NetCaptor for it's tabbed browsing, wonder if he saw Firefox or not.

    Josh

    1. Re:Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well you *are* wrong. Its written in C++ with XUL for user interface.

    2. Re:Thunderbird by stateofmind · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Flamebait?? WTF, lemme guess, because I'm using a Mircosoft product?

      Sorry for expressing an opinon. I love Thunderbird, just stating why I'm not using it.

      Josh

    3. Re:Thunderbird by dolphinling · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thunderbird is most definetly NOT in Java. It's based on the Mozilla suite, which is all C or C++, and a lot of Javascript too.

      Besides, even if it is slow (it isn't for me), it's still a lot faster than OE once you get a system full of viruses and stuff.

      --
      There are 11 types of people in the world: those who can count in binary, and those who can't.
    4. Re:Thunderbird by stateofmind · · Score: 0

      On my P3-450 it's very slow (for obvious reasons), but even on my 1.2ghz, it can be sluggish. Is that do to the XUL processing (someone mentioned it uses XUL), or other factors?

      I hate it my original post got labled flamebait, I wasn't trying to be troll. Just so ya know.

    5. Re:Thunderbird by anarxia · · Score: 1
      The reason you got labeled flamebait is because everybody else had a different experience, so they assumed you were BSing. I tried it on a PII-450 with Windows XP, which should be slower than your P3 and it was just as fast as OE and slow is definately not a word I would use to describe it.

      It seems you were unlucky :) This is Slashdot and people take OSS very seriously.

    6. Re:Thunderbird by dolphinling · · Score: 1

      No, the actual XUL is stored as a text file, but that's converted to a binary that's used for startup, so it shouldn't add any time to startup at all.

      It's always good to test with a new profile, as corruption can cause slowdowns, but other than that it's hard to help from afar. Try the netscape.public.mozilla.general newsgroup (NOT any of the others in n.p.m, they're all for developers!) and make sure you give enough system information.

      --
      There are 11 types of people in the world: those who can count in binary, and those who can't.
  12. This is not funny, it is insightful. by Anonytroll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, that is not a bad point. It is a question if you want brand consciousness and a lot of jokes (you don't change the name to Thunderfox) or you want a similar naming scheme and a lot of jokes (you change the name).
    On the other hand, they might run into trademark-problems once again if they try to change the name of the program to Thunderfox. There are only so many words one can use for a product/company per market niche.

    I'd say this is one of those problems that are best ignored, however not renaming it is the easier way out.

    1. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by pavon · · Score: 4, Informative

      On the other hand, they might run into trademark-problems once again if they try to change the name of the program to Thunderfox. There are only so many words one can use for a product/company per market niche.

      Good point. FYI a quick search only brings up one software package called thunderfox - a video game from the 80's, and a bunch of posturing on whether thunderbird will change it's name to thunderfox. Discarding those just leaves us with people who call themselves thunderfox on the internet, and just happen to be talking about software. So if there is a software package called thunderfox, the authors apparently don't care about anyone knowing about it.

    2. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      I think we also have to remember that firefox/bird and thunderbird are just working names, when this stuff goes gold, it will just be called mozilla browser and mozilla mail. OTOH I did like being able to refer to 'the birds', and would appreciate 'the foxes' (or is that foxen?), but I can also understand mozilla.org's reluctance to play name changes any more

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    3. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by Finuvir · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not the current plan. The current plan is for them to retain their current names. They did originally say "don't worry; it's just a codename" but since putting such effort into finding a unique trademark-free name they're now planning on keeping it (witness the new artwork and brand identity work).

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    4. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by scrytch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Actually, that is not a bad point. It is a question if you want brand consciousness and a lot of jokes (you don't change the name to Thunderfox) or you want a similar naming scheme and a lot of jokes (you change the name).

      It is a similar naming scheme. Firefox, Thunderbird ... what the hell is a "Thunderfox"? It just happens to name a different commonly heard of imaginary animal (tho actually a Firefox is a red panda).

      I can only hope the ridiculous "Sunbird" name for the calendar product never takes off (and they get a better icon that's actually visible). It's not an official mozilla product anyway, so I'm not worried yet. Maybe "Sundog", but there's got to be another creature that'd fit the scheme.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    5. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      Well in that case, it should be renamed thunderfox to keep the ties between mail and browser apparent.

      But mabey that's not what they want anymore?

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    6. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      It's still in the form [greek-element][animal], which seems close enough for me.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    7. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we also have to remember that firefox/bird and thunderbird are just working names, when this stuff goes gold, it will just be called mozilla browser and mozilla mail.

      They've got a trademark on Firefox - why the heck would you go to all the trouble and expense of registering a trademark for a temporary working name?

      Basically, that was the old plan, but it no longer seems to be the case. They now seem to be trying to build a strong brand identity around the Firefox name, which is not what one does if one is planning to ditch it when the product is finished.

    8. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      It's certainly a 'more-similar' naming scheme than Internet Explorer and Outlook Express.

    9. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by McNally · · Score: 1
      It's still in the form [greek-element][animal], which seems close enough for me.
      Thunder is an element?
    10. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, too many Final Fantasy games. My bad. Earth is too boring an element so they replaced it with thunder. Actually now that I think of it, is there some Eastern (Japanese) set of elements similar to the Greek ones (Fire, Lightning, Ice and Water instead of Earth, Fire, Wind and Water) that would explain why they show up in the FF games and other RPGs? Or did someone just decide they were better for offensive magic (obviously they never saw Captain Planet)? I wonder...

      Either way, I don't think Thunderbird is too far removed from Firefox for people to see the similarity.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    11. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by storem · · Score: 1
      What about the Sunbird project?

      The Sunbird Project is a redesign of the Mozilla Calendar component. The goal is to produce a cross platform standalone calendar application based on Mozilla's XUL user interface language. At the moment the "Sunbird" name is a project name. It is not official and may change in the future.

    12. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I want to say that I love the new Thunderbird logo/icon. It fits in with the Firefox theme and is really beautiful. It's only too bad that it's too small to really tell what it is.

      Second, while I like the names Firefox and Thunderbird, even I have trouble remembering which is which sometimes. I usually have to check the application menubar when I suggest the software to someone, because I can't recall if Thunderbird is the browser or the email client and visa versa.

      Wouldn't it make more sense for both applications to have the same name, ending in "email" or "browser"? I mean, rather than "Mozilla Thunderbird Email" and "Mozilla Firefox Browser", it would make sense for both to have the same brand name. "Mozilla Browser" and "Mozilla Email". Or "Firefox Email" and "Firefox Browser".

    13. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by risings0n · · Score: 1

      Sundog is a brand of middle-range sports sunglasses. To put it simple: Oakley replicas, but with some kind of quality. I own some :)

    14. Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      I can only hope the ridiculous "Sunbird" name for the calendar product never takes off (and they get a better icon that's actually visible). It's not an official mozilla product anyway, so I'm not worried yet. Maybe "Sundog", but there's got to be another creature that'd fit the scheme.

      They've got fire and air elementals. Now they need water and earth, and they'll be able to use some badass combo techniques.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  13. Evolution by pseudochaotic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How does this compare to Ximian Evolution? I've been using it for a while, but i'd probably switch if it was really worth it.

    --
    And the l33t shall inherit the 34r7h.
    1. Re:Evolution by kronak · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I very much like Evolution because:

      1. It installs much more quickly, and
      2. It is better integrated with GNOME.

      However, I have been hearing good things about the new version, so I guess you'll just have to install it and see for yourself.

    2. Re:Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used Thunderbird for quite a while, but ended up going back to Evolution. Evol seems faster to me - which is surprising because TB is supposed to be some kind of light weight e-mail client. But I'm also aware of the fact that TB isn't even at 1.0 yet, so I'm sure code optimizations are in the works. But Evol also has more "polish" ... though again TB will improve in that area as newer versions come out.

      I actually moved my e-mail to IMAP just so I could more freely switch between e-mail clients. No more exporting/importing.

    3. Re:Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "How does this compare to Ximian Evolution?"

      It's not as yellow.

    4. Re:Evolution by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1
      I think the joke in the story was about Evolution. Could be wrong. Here's the quote:

      I switched from some murky client which didn't exactly have a bright outlook regarding spam to Thunderbird a while back and was not dissapointed.

    5. Re:Evolution by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      Features wise, Thunderbird is to Evolution as Outlook Express is to Outlook.

    6. Re:Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefere Evolution if it wasn't for the fact that you cannot disable HTML in evolution. You can set the mail you send to be plain text, but what you recieve, and reply will be HTML if thats what was sent to you.

      In Thunderbird I can basically disable HTML entirely and can actually read the email I am sent from work, which looks like '97 geocities pages.

    7. Re:Evolution by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I switched recently from Evo (on Linux, on Win32 I've been using TB for long time) to Thunderbird.

      Some reasons:
      1) It STILL has few "freeze" bugs where it just goes unreactive and can not be recovered without killing the damn thing and restarting it. Those have been there forever, and for a software that old, absolutely should not exist any more. Heck, thunderbird is much younger and nevertheless lot more stable.

      2) (this might be related to the first, or the milder case of same disease) It's very unresponsive every now and then when doing something, especially the IMAP support.

      3) No bayesian spam filtering without resorting to external applications - which seems to trigger no. 1 very ofter.

      Of course evo has some very nice pluses of it's own (calendar, virtual folders, etc.), so it's all about what you need...

    8. Re:Evolution by KlaymenDK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...with the exception that Mozilla offers a (learning!)junk mail filter, Ximian does not.

    9. Re:Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also switched from using Evolution to Thunderbird at work. At home I use Thunderbird.

      The virtual folders and other features of Evolution are very useful but its LDAP look up worked very poorly. Evolution would forget my password, fail to find email addresses I *knew* were in the list and lock up when searching.

      Thunderbird 0.5 could do LDAP look ups instantly with no problems. So after getting tired of stopping and starting Evolution just to look up an email address I switched.

    10. Re:Evolution by dizzyduck · · Score: 1

      The 1.5 series of Evolution has seamless Spam Assassin integration. It's not quite fully stable yet, but its getting close.

      --
      Allergy advice: Contains eggs.
  14. Oh, and the name is staying Thunderbird by sgarrity · · Score: 5, Informative

    As I'm sure lots of people will ask, the Thunderbird name is staying.

    1. Re:Oh, and the name is staying Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      As I'm sure lots of people will ask

      A likely story. You just wanted 2 (+1 Informative) posts in the same thread. Oh yes, we're on to you. :-)

    2. Re:Oh, and the name is staying Thunderbird by sharkey · · Score: 1

      At least until noon.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  15. IMAP IDLE Support by jaylee7877 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For me, the most important new feature is IMAP IDLE Support. What this means is I can deploy TB to my 1500+ users. They can leave TB open all of the time and recieve instant notification of new messages. Our Courier IMAP Server which uses FAM for Enhanced IDLE Support means IDLE connections are using virtually NILL resources. Rather than polling every x number of minutes which causes a filesystem stat of the mailbox, FAM hooks into the Linux kernel, catches any changes to the mail folder, notifies Courier which in turn notifies the IMAP Client. This rocks!

    1. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by reaper20 · · Score: 1

      How is your performance with IMAP IDLE in Courier? I tried it for a little while but found Dovecot to be much quicker (at just about everything). It'd be nice to find a benchmark of IMAP servers.

      I agree on IMAP idle, it's just an excellent feature.

    2. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by XCorvis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're deploying a "technology preview" to 1500+ users? Thunderbird is great and all (I use it), but that's ballsy.

    3. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by Skweetis · · Score: 1

      I'm testing it right now with my Courier IMAP server with FAM. I have almost 10,000 users, so good IDLE behavior becomes important. My connection is using just under 2 megs of RAM and negligible CPU. Seems to work well so far. Overall, TB seems to have a decent IMAP implementation.

    4. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by FooAtWFU · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is it as "ballsy" as just inviting viruses by using, say, Outlook?

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    5. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by XCorvis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Touche.

      But, as good as Thunderbird is at blocking spam and viruses, if it starts deleting people's email because it's not fully tested, there will be hell to pay.

    6. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by nolife · · Score: 1

      Well considering that he is using IMAP for email, it is not really an issue. You can have multiple email clients attaching to the same server to read email. Its not like the mail format or a completely new system has to replace something else.
      Those not familiar with TB could still use their existing mail client with no interuption.

      All of this assuming that one is not being removed and TB being forced as the only client.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    7. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're deploying a "technology preview" to 1500+ users? Thunderbird is great and all (I use it), but that's ballsy.

      Eh? I've always been stymied by people who view anything less than "1.0" as "not ready for the enterprise"

      In the Open Source world, version numbers are somewhat irrelevant. One day it's .37 and the next it's 1.0 ... Even the linux kernel, when going from 2.2 to 2.4 and from 2.4 to 2.6 was fairly arbirtrary... it's not like alot of changes didn't go in after the version rollover. (and critical bug fixes too)

      Simply put. All software has bugs. Version numbers are simply markers for points in time. While some builds are more stable than others, you shouldn't sit pining for a 1.0 version, when 0.6 is probably damn fine, and less bugs than Outlook.

      Better yet, ever heard of the "3.0" Microsoft Schedule?

      Microsoft tends to release software FAR too fricken early, known as 1.0 (Opensource would call that 0.2)... It's buggy, useless and not worth looking at.

      Then 2.0 comes out, delivers the bare minimum of functionality, but still sucks featurewise, and has some significant bugs (Opensource calls this 0.5)

      Then 3.0 comes out, delivers the promise of 1.0, not too buggy, but functional. Looks like a real app now. (Opensource calls this 0.8)

      Then 4.0 comes out, and Has tons of bells and whistles, and a huge userbase, 'cause they've gone thru 4 versions. Opensource calls this 1.0

      feh.

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    8. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by LNX+Flocki · · Score: 1

      So what mail client would you roll out to 1500+ users then ? I've never seen a better mail client for Windows than Thunderbird. Compared with what is used in most businesses (Outlook) it's much less of a resource hog (ever tried to open Outlook with 5000+ messages ??) and much less effort to support (try recovering a corrupt .pst file - have fun!).

      Now that the IDLE command is supported I'll propose switching to TB at my office.

    9. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about plain ol Mozilla?

      Everyone was jizzing over the last milestone of T-Bird, but I found it to be very alpha-ish software. Geek Goodness doesn't translate well to regular users.

    10. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by LNX+Flocki · · Score: 1

      Also possible but I think the typical luser will find thunderbird less confusing. Also mozilla isn't exactly resource friendly. On my home PC Mozilla uses about 35 megs while TB takes less than 20. This might be irrelevant on a PC with 512 MB but if the majority of your users are on a W2k Citrix farm (like in our office) this difference *is* relevant.

      But otherwise, yea why not.

    11. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, a knee-jerk anti-Microsoft rant isn't going to save this guy's job if Thunderbird blows up in his face. When the users are surrounding his cubical with torches, is he supposed to cite your bullshit that 0.6 == 2.0?

    12. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      As if outlook never, ever, corrupted anyone's email.

      You're basically saying that because a product doesn't carry the 1.0 label it inherently must be unreliable. 1.0 does not correspond in any way to product quality. Thunderbird can be 0.6 and more reliable than outlook.

    13. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as commonly cited, Firefox + Thunderbird > Mozilla in terms of resource use. At least until they finish componentizing the backends. But if bloat is an issue, any Mozilla product probably is not the best fit due to the architecture. Maybe something like Eudora or Oprah.

    14. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by LNX+Flocki · · Score: 1

      That's right, but again, compared with outlook the resource usage is fine. Opera quite frankly stinks in a multiuser environment. I tried running it on our test farm and it wreaked havoc with the users' profiles. Never tried Eudora on Citrix so can't comment on that.

    15. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by N1KO · · Score: 1

      He's running IMAP so email resides on the server. Unless there's a very ugly bug making thunderbird delete emails on the server there's no way they'll be lost.

    16. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by XCorvis · · Score: 1
      Not quite. I'm saying because the Thunderbird/Mozilla.org dev team considers Thunderbird to be an UNFINISHED product ("technology preview" is their phrase, not mine), you need to take that into consideration. The version number reflects the developer confidence level. The dev team does not have 100% confidence in their product because they have not gone to a 1.0 release. If they had 100% confidence (and the full feature set), they would make it a 1.0 release. Or so their numbering system leads me to believe.

      From the Thunderbird website:
      Mozilla Thunderbird is a Technology Preview.
      This software may work well enough to be relied upon as your primary messaging client as it is based off a stable Mozilla 1.6 architecture. However, Mozilla Thunderbird is still a preview release, and therefore several features may not be complete.

    17. Re:IMAP IDLE Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unfortunately, at least on Linux, IDLE support isn't really polished yet.

      Even if you set a bunch of IMAP folders as "check for new messages", Thunderbird doesn't check any of them for new messages at startup, except Inbox. Even if "Check for messages at startup" is ON!

      Thunderbird only starts up a new connection to the IMAP server (thus starting the IDLE process for that folder) if you explicitly check it manually at some point. Even then, it's very sporadic at actually notifying you that it's downloaded new mail via IDLE.

      Therefore, you still have to use the "check mail every X minutes" option OR click each folder you want updated manually on startup!!


      This post brought to you by Thunderbird, annoyance, and TCPdump.

      Though Thunderbird is still an amazing client!

  16. Better spam filters? by nickos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really hope so. I moved my parent's business PC to Thunderbird from Outlook about 6 months ago, and recently taught them how to use the Junk mail feature. The problem is that 0.5 seems to move a lot of legitimate email to the Junk folder (although it may be that my parents are marking things as junk when they just want to delete them - sigh).

    Oh yeah, the new icon looks really nice too, almost as good as FireFoxs.

    1. Re:Better spam filters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, that's what was happening to my mom. She wanted to remove stuff from her inbox, so she'd mark it as junkmail, and it'd go away.

      Eventually I had to teach her the difference between Deleting and Junkmailing: One means you don't see that email again, the other means you don't see emails like it again.

    2. Re:Better spam filters? by jedrek · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm sad to say this, but the Thunderbird filters are pretty crap.

      I switched to an IMAP setup at home - I have about 8-9 mailboxes on 4 different servers I check, getmail snags them all and courier serves them via IMAP. I use Thunderbird, TheBat and Mutt to read it. Nothing really special about the setup.

      I haven't had time to implement any kind of server-side spam filtering, so I've been using Thunderbird (it's on the always-on desktop) to filter junk mail. The filtering is poor, to say the least. I've been using TB for about 4 months now, training it. I get a lot of spam - 100-150 piece/day - and right now it catches about 70%. Recently, I fed it about 6000 pieces of mail, all spam. It caught less than half. The false positive ratio is also too high for my liking - about 5-8%.

      I probably wouldn't be bitching if it hadn't been for POPFile, which I used back when I was checking accts via POP. With POPFile, the accuracy rate ran at 98.5%. Nuff said.

    3. Re:Better spam filters? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Does anyone have experience with both Thunderbird and Apple's Mail? Mail's filtering works wonderously for me. I very rarely get either good mail in the junk mail folder or junk mail in my inbox. I can't remember the last time it sorted incorrectly.

      --

      mbbac

    4. Re:Better spam filters? by SimplexO · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's New?

      Improved Junk Mail Controls

      The algorithm for the adaptive junk mail controls has been heavily redesigned to learn faster and catch more spam.

      To get the best possible experience from the new junk mail controls, we highly recommend that you re-train the filters from scratch. Tools > Junk Mail Controls > Adaptive Filters > Reset Training Data. Be sure to train an equal number of good and junk messages. We recommend several hundred messages of each.

      The enable/disable option for adaptive junk mail detection appears to apply to all accounts (Tools > Junk Mail Controls > Adaptive Filters). It is, however, a per account option. To set the option for a specific account, choose the account in the 'Account:' dropdown on the 'Settings' panel, then switch to the 'Adaptive Filters' panel and set the option. Repeat per account as needed.

    5. Re:Better spam filters? by lastninja · · Score: 1

      The first time I ran Thunderbird it marked every mail in my inbox as spam. But after some training it gets nearly every mail right, combined with my ISP filtering I haven`t gotten one spam mail in my inbox for several months.

      --
      John Carmack fan, browsing at +5 since 1999.
    6. Re:Better spam filters? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      Well I haven't checked out Thunderbird's new algorithms yet (supposedly they were working on implementing SpamBayes support) but SpamBayes has a neat little POP3 filter if you can use that, check it out...

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  17. Meanwhile by arvindn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mozilla is starting the drive to firefox 1.0, and Ben Goodger (the firefox guy) is requesting that everyone report/nominate their most favorite bugs so that they have a better chance of getting fixed.

  18. IMAP? by ThogScully · · Score: 1

    How does Thunderbird do with IMAP and IMAP-ssl? I use Kontact/KMail now and really have little reason to switch, but I'm always up for trying new things if they have really made a nice interface.

    So who uses IMAP with T-Bird and how does it do?
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
    1. Re:IMAP? by jaylee7877 · · Score: 5, Informative

      As my post above suggests, .6 adds IMAP IDLE support which is an advanced IMAP function only available in a handful of IMAP Clients/Servers but well worth it if you have it. I've found TB's IMAP support to be excellent. It's one of the few clients that can correctly show my Courier IMAP Server's folder tree with all other folders *not* being children of INBOX. It's very fast in grabbing message headers, even on large folders it seems limited only by the bandwidth. It also does a good job of cacheing the info so that the 2nd time I open up a large folder is much quicker than the 1st (unless of course another IMAP client has significantlly changed the existing mail messages). Offline support has also been added with a plugin although I have little reason to try it since most of the time I use TB, I'm connected.

    2. Re:IMAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that Thunderbird's supposed to have some of the best IMAP support around. I use i with IMAP-ssl for a couple of mailboxes and it works just fine. It has support for quite a bit of the IMAP specifcation (e.g. shared folders, quotas). This is also the first release to contain support for the IDLE command so the server can push new mail to the clent rather han wating for the client to poll for the messages.

      I couldn't say how it compares to Kmail however, since I've never used Kmail.

    3. Re:IMAP? by Whizzmo2 · · Score: 1
      I use IMAP over a PLINK (PuTTY) tunnel. Works great for me. I have my Thunderbird Icon linked to a batch file that fires the tunnel up, then launches Thunderbird. I login to "localhost" instead of my mail server, but all else (IMAP folders, filters, rules, drag-n-drop) works like a champ.

      My setup:
      • Win2k Sp4
      • Thunderbird 0.5 (upgrading shortly!)
      • PuTTY 0.54
    4. Re:IMAP? by reaper20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The one annoying thing about TBird's IMAPSSL support is that you can't check a box when you create an account "Use SSL" or whatever right away like you can in Evolution.

      So, you need to add the new account, finish the wizard, wait for it to sit there and go "the server says ssl only, fool", then go into the account settings, check the box, hit OK, quit thunderbird, relaunch thunderbird ... then it'll connect via SSL.

    5. Re:IMAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty much all the IMAP mail clients for Linux (and in this case, Windows/MacOS) are superior to KMail as far as IMAP handling goes. I'd have to say Mozilla-mail/Thunderbird are quite likely the best IMAP support you can find in any GUI mail client on Linux.

      I say this as someone who himself doesn't use nor has anything to gain by saying the Mozilla IMAP implementation is superior to any others I've seen (other than one I'm currently working on, but which is not available yet and likely the c-client implmenetation, which I have not yet bothered to read mostly because I cringe at the coding style).

    6. Re:IMAP? by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like KMail is just a horrible IMAP client, but I've never used any better. I tried the Windows variants years ago with every one missing something obvious, like proper Trash or Sent handling, or the deal someone else mentioned where every folder was a subfolder of Inbox, or just bad interfaces, especially for keyboard only operation. When I found KMail, it was damn near perfect. The only other client I've used since finding KMail is my SquirrelMail webmail setup, when I'm away from my machines.

      And KMail has only gotten better since I started using it. Anyway, from the sound of things, people seem to very highly regard T-Bird, so I'll give it a shot when I have some time to compile or I find a nice Debian package.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    7. Re:IMAP? by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I did try the other Linux IMAP clients I could find too, but really none worked out for me. I found them either too slow and kludgy like Evolution or again missing the Trash/Sent type of stuff like Mozilla's Mail/News.

      Anyway, I'm just surprised that apparently KMail is the bottom of the barrel in your eyes.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    8. Re:IMAP? by jaylee7877 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You could accomplish this by including a ISP customized option, this allows you to add your own radio button instead of just Email Account and Newsgroup account. The file you wish to create is \defaults\isp\US\custom.rdf. This allows you to set defaults for your user's such as the IMAP and SMTP server addresses, SSL support and preference settings. I was unable to find a definitive site for creating the customizations but Google helped me piece things together.

    9. Re:IMAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "all folders under INBOX" thing is simply how your IMAP server presents the folder tree to the client, so the client *SHOULD* be showing them to you in this way, otherwise one could argue that the client is broken :-)

      anyways, when I say KMail sucks as an imap client, I'm not talking about user interface - I'm talking about implementation. eg. the code sucks. it doesn't do certain things properly, etc.

    10. Re:IMAP? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      It's one of the few clients that can correctly show my Courier IMAP Server's folder tree with all other folders *not* being children of INBOX

      Any mail client will do this - just set your IMAP server folder or prefix in settings to "INBOX".

    11. Re:IMAP? by jaylee7877 · · Score: 1

      No, any IMAP client will not do this. They will properly create folders, etc, but they will still show other folders as children of INBOX. Trust me, I've done exstensive testing with this.

    12. Re:IMAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually don't bother to wait for a server error message. I finish the wizard, go immediately into account settings, make the change, and then quit and relaunch thunderbird. Works fine.

    13. Re:IMAP? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      So did they fix the IMAP folder thread display issue? (Where messages display out of order, and threads are horribly mangled.)

      Does 0.6 allow you to move messages into an IMAP folder while off-line, then sync up with the server?

      (Just two bugs that forced me to ditch trying to use IMAP with FuseMail.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  19. I cant wait! by SlashDread · · Score: 0

    A new Icon!

    "/Dread"

  20. icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "and a new brand identity, including a new Firefox-style icon."

    Hint, hint, hint, hint...

    Time for Slashdot to update its icon for Firefox & company now. No more dinosaur on amphetemenes... time for a real icon. Come on, guys.

    1. Re:icon by dubious9 · · Score: 1

      Erm... it's still in the mozilla family. Besides there are lot's of other slashdot icons that should change before firefox/thunderbird get their due.

      Oh, like maybe an SCO icon. Or maybe a less derisive Microsoft icon. It would be a great feature that for story submittals that a user could upload an appropriate icon. The editors could then use that one or a stock icon. I know it's asking alot, but "Come on, guys".

      Back on topic, I've downloaded it and put it in place of the previous thunderbird directory, no hitches. I do like it alot. But two minor quibbles, why does the deault download binary not have the version in the filename. They also went back to gzip from bzip2. Contrast:

      thunderbird-i686-linux-gtk2+xft.tar.gz
      thunderbird-0.5-i686-pc-linux-gtk2-gnu.tar.bz2

      And while we're on the note of mozilla in general, how come the user directory for firefox is still .pheonix?? Yeah, yeah, name change stuff, but if you change the name, shouldn't you change all of it. You could still search for other spellings, but "Come on, guys".

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    2. Re:icon by tepples · · Score: 1

      Isn't the dino still both the Suite's icon and the icon of mozilla.org in general?

    3. Re:icon by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      And while we're on the note of mozilla in general, how come the user directory for firefox is still .pheonix?? Yeah, yeah, name change stuff, but if you change the name, shouldn't you change all of it. You could still search for other spellings, but "Come on, guys".

      the recent nightly builds by default uses .firefox. when you execute firefox, it copies the files from .phoenix there. unfortunately, the themes are not copied, so it would actually work better if you manually copy the dir... or better yet, symlink it.

  21. That's cool. by suso · · Score: 0

    I was just getting ready to install it anyways.

  22. Fedora RPM? by Christianfreak · · Score: 1

    Anyone know where I can get one? Not on the apt repositories yet :(

    1. Re:Fedora RPM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You usually can get this from Dag or Fedora.us but they don't have packages ready yet

  23. Deleting Emails with Mozilla Mail Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I delete an email it disappears at the GUI level, but when I vi the Inbox file the email is still there and so the Inbox folder is growing. Am I doing something wrong or does Mozilla email client really suck that much.

    1. Re:Deleting Emails with Mozilla Mail Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Anonymous Coward asked:

      When I delete an email it disappears at the GUI level, but when I vi the Inbox file the email is still there and so the Inbox folder is growing. Am I doing something wrong or does Mozilla email client really suck that much.

      It's similar to deleting files in a FAT filesystem. The file (email) itself remains, but until the info is specifically purged, it remains on the disk (inbox). Use the "Compact This Folder" command from the folder's context menu.

    2. Re:Deleting Emails with Mozilla Mail Client by juhaz · · Score: 1

      If it's an IMAP box, the option you're probably looking for is in server settings, 'Clean up ("Expunge") Inbox on Exit'

    3. Re:Deleting Emails with Mozilla Mail Client by pyros · · Score: 1

      That's because it's an IMAP folder (I assume). You have the option, per account, to have delete mark for deletion and expunge in one step, or move to the trash folder (which marks it for deletion in the current folder, but doesn't expunge it). You can set it to hide messages marked for deletion or display them. From the File menu, you can "Compact Folders" to expunge deleted mail from all folders, or right click a specific folder and "Compact Folder" to expunge deleted messages from just that one.

    4. Re:Deleting Emails with Mozilla Mail Client by STrinity · · Score: 1

      No, I think the problem is that he's not compacting his folders. All downloaded emails are stored in a single text file. (I believe this is true of all email clients, not just TB, though the formatting of the file varies.) When you hit delete, TB adds a note to ignore the message, but it stays in the text file until you compact folders.

      The Offline extension (which is now a standard option in the Windows installer) has a feature for automatically compacting folders when they exceed a certain size.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  24. Re:My day just keeps getting better by Finuvir · · Score: 1, Funny

    A date?

    Well I hope you had fun on Slashdot while it lasted. Good luck in your non-geek life. *Sob*

    --
    Why is anything anything?
  25. What's New: by karmatic · · Score: 5, Informative
    What's New:
    • Windows Installer

      Thunderbird now comes with an installer for Windows making it easier than ever to start using Thunderbird!

    • New Default Theme on Mac OS X

      The new Pinstripe theme fits in with the look of Mac OS X.

    • Improved Junk Mail Controls

      The algorithm for the adaptive junk mail controls has been heavily redesigned to learn faster and catch more spam.

    • New Brand Identity

      To be consistent with the Mozilla Foudation's goal of brand identity, Thunderbird has a new logo and supporting artwork thanks to the fine work of the Mozilla Visual Identity team.

    • Other New Features...

      IMAP users can now benefit from support for the IMAP IDLE command which allows the mail server to push notifications such as new mail arriving as soon as it arrives.

      Thunderbird supports server-wide news filters that apply to all newsgroups on a server.

      Thunderbird includes Secure Password Authentication using a new cross-platform NTLM authentication mechanism for IMAP, POP3 and SMTP.

      Mail filters can now mark messages as junk.

      Offline support is an optional download component in the Windows installer and is no longer a separately-downloaded extension.

      Mac OS X users now get new mail notification in the system dock.

      The DOM Inspector is an optional download component in the Windows installer for theme authors.

      Tools > Options > Compose > HTML Options allows you to set up default HTML compose options such as font, size and color.

      Attachments can be opened directly from the compose window to verify their contents before sending.

      Thunderbird now supports the notion of multiple identities per mail account. This makes it easy to have several e-mail addresses which end up going into the same account. Read More about how to set this up.

    • Recently Fixed Bugs

      In the case of a failure when copying a message to an online Sent folder, Thunderbird will now ask if you would like it to try again.

      0.6 on Windows includes several improvements to Simple MAPI that allow it to work with older versions of Microsoft Office.

      Pasting data from an OpenOffice.org spreadsheet no longer pastes random HTML garbage before the actual spreadsheet data into HTML compose.

      Fixed several situations where LDAP connections were left open when using LDAP auto complete or performing searches on LDAP directories.

      Improved view source behavior.

      Mail notification for POP3 messages that are marked deleted or marked read by mail filters no longer occurs.

      The "Mark All Read" keyboard shortcut now works for Linux GTK2.

    1. Re:What's New: by locknloll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows Installer
      Thunderbird now comes with an installer for Windows making it easier than ever to start using Thunderbird!


      Sucks. This means that you have to go into the Control Panel & do all the blablabla to uninstall the application. I found it much easier to simply delete the app folder & unzip the new version in the same place. But I guess that the average user is rather familiar with a "real" installer...

      --
      -- Power corrupts, but PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.
    2. Re:What's New: by poulbailey · · Score: 4, Informative

      > I found it much easier to simply delete the app folder & unzip the new version in the same place.

      ... then why don't you use the zipfile? You can download it here.

    3. Re:What's New: by locknloll · · Score: 1

      ah cool :) guess I should have checked the FTP server instead of only looking for the zip file on the website. Thanks!

      --
      -- Power corrupts, but PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.
    4. Re:What's New: by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      You don't have to, it just makes it easier for people who are afraid of exploring their file system.

      I used a self-created installer for Thunderbird 0.5 (using Nullsoft's Installation System), but I still just deleted the directory and used the new installer, skipping the uninstall of the previous version.

    5. Re:What's New: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Installer

      Thunderbird now comes with an installer for Windows making it easier than ever to start using Thunderbird!


      Great. What about those of us who already use it? Let me quote...

      Upgraders: DO NOT install Mozilla Thunderbird into a directory containing program files from a previous version. Overwriting files from a previous release WILL cause problems. To re-use the directory of a previous install, the directory must be deleted and recreated, emptied, moved, or renamed. You should not file bugs in Bugzilla if you choose to ignore this step.

      Sorry, but I am not impressed. I'd really rather they worked on making the upgrade process easier before they wasted time on a flashy installer. Why do I have to worry about cleaning up after the previous installation before I can upgrade to a point release? No other program I've ever used makes me do that (apart from Firefox, but that's the same thing really).

      I guess I'll be sticking with my pre-0.5 nightly for a while yet. Wake me up when it's possible to upgrade without jumping through hoops.

    6. Re:What's New: by Enonu · · Score: 1

      The Windows API provides functions for replacing a file that's currently in use as well as deleting a file that's currently in use. Installers take advantage of this feature, and so they provide for a smoother upgrade path than having to terminate and applications and processes manually. They also nice features such as rollbacks and configuration backup.

      Then again, not every application has to integrate itself into the OS or provide some doohickey that sits in the tray. In this case, and if your target audience is power-users as you've mention, then a simple zip file is a great distribution medium.

  26. Re:My day just keeps getting better by justkarl · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here's a tip: if you want to impress her, DO NOT talk about the new Mozilla Thunderbird release, or even anything you saw on Slashdot today. Coding/opensource and chicks are mutually exclusive.

  27. It's Great! by calbanese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad they removed my ability to send messages. Oh well, looks like its back to .05 for me.

    1. Re:It's Great! by Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are you talking about? It works fine for me. You didn't install over top of your 0.5 installation did you?

  28. Include Mozilla Calendar! by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know that some people will flame on about the "small tools" approach, but it would really make sense to tightly integrate Mozilla Calendar into Thunderbird. Like it or not, people have expectations, and the general expectation is that their email program will be a full PIM suite (Calendar, Tasks, Contacts). As nice as Thunderbird is, there's a large segment of the population that will take a look at it and say "No calendar? Then I'll stick with Outlook." And that's a shame, because getting rid of Outlook is one step on the road to getting rid of Windows.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by Azureflare · · Score: 1
      What's this? I click the link you give me, click on the downloads section, and then... Whoa! Scroll down, and guess what! There's a Calendar for Thunderbird!

      Whoa! I didn't know that! Thanks for the information. BTW, I agree they should bundle them together, or at least mention Thunderbird and Calendar on the same download page.

    2. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by brownpau · · Score: 1

      ...the general expectation is that their email program will be a full PIM suite....

      I have no such expectations; Thunderbird is my main email client precisely because it doesn't try to be a full PIM suite. I manage my own calendar, contacts, and To-Do lists by other means, and I don't want yet more do-everything-for-you bloatware when all I really need is plain old email functionality.

      "...take the easy path: I brought you a suite of applications that all work together." - Phil, the Prince of Insufficient Light

    3. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yes, they do have it available as an extension. But they need to do several things:
      • Include it by default, or at least make it SUPER EASY to install. (It's not click-and-run like some other extensions are, because it's not pure XUL -- there's a native library involved.)
      • Allow Thunderbird to handle sending and receiving of meeting invitations (I understand this is in the works)
      • Schedule meetings while looking at the invitees' free/busy times. Since Thunderbird already has LDAP support, it should be trivial to look in LDAP for someone's free/busy list URL.
      • Most importantly of all, it needs to support server-side calendar store! The open source community appears to want to standardize on IMAP (just a folder called "Calendar" full of vCalendar objects), and that's just a dandy way of doing it. Nobody (and I mean nobody at all) has implemented CAP because it's so damn hairy. WCAP has a small following because it's what Netscape...iPlanet...SunONE Calendar Server uses, but IMAP is still the better solution because every mail program already supports it.
      This is important stuff, and it needs to get implemented and put into the hands of users ASAP.

      (And to answer the Slashbots' next question: yes, I'm already involved and working. Are you?)
      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    4. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by mbbac · · Score: 1

      I switch my home environment from Windows to Macintosh sometime in 2001. I much prefer having separate mail, calendar, and address book applications.

      --

      mbbac

    5. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by _aa_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to disagree. I see a great advantage in having each application in a stand-alone context. I'd rather see mozilla-calendar stand-alone. Not everyone who wants an email client needs a calendar, and not everyone who needs a calendar wants an email client attached to it.

      I don't think the goal of the mozilla projects should be to destroy their "competition". That's what Microsoft does. Instead of immitating and trying to replace Outlook, mozilla should be innovative and different. And I think that they have been doing just that.

    6. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by Indiscipline · · Score: 1

      I know that many other people wants a mail client that sends and receives mail. I'm one of them.

    7. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by John_Booty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most importantly of all, it needs to support server-side calendar store!

      Thunderbird can publish calendars that are compatible with Apple's iCal calendar format. It's not exactly a replacement for groupware-type stuff like Exchange, as far as I can tell, but you can subscribe to others' calendars and keep your own calendar online so that you can access it from whereever you want.

      More info: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/faq.html# share

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    8. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by Etyenne · · Score: 1
      Most importantly of all, it needs to support server-side calendar store! The open source community appears to want to standardize on IMAP (just a folder called "Calendar" full of vCalendar objects), and that's just a dandy way of doing it.

      iCalendar-over-WebDAV would be nice too, and TMK it is what Apple use for their iCal thingy. AFAIK, Mozilla does not support WebDAV though ... I guess that would be a worthy addition.

      --
      :wq
    9. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by STrinity · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree. I see a great advantage in having each application in a stand-alone context. I'd rather see mozilla-calendar stand-alone.

      Already exists. It's pretty sweet even though it's only on version 0.1.1. Its biggest problem is that it doesn't get as much attention as Thunderbird and Firefox -- there aren't any extensions for it, and the few compatible themes are a PIA to install.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    10. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      I agree that each application should have a stand-alone context and that horizontal and vertical integration (sometimes genuinely useful, sometimes gratuitous lock-in attempt) should not be mandated.

      But I do constantly get seminar and meeting reminders via email that I'd like to add to my calendar. Having a button to authorize negotiation between the email client and the calendar scheduling client would be a genuine convenient feature.

      The interface specification should be fully-specified, open and documented so that even command line invocations of and communications with the calendaring application are possible.

      Open source wins because it can afford to be completely open and to become interoperable with anyone.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    11. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to answer the Slashbots' next question: yes, I'm already involved and working. Are you?

      No, but I'm not bitching about it... and more importantly, I don't care whether or not you use it. (Really it's the advocates that should be working on it, not the users.)

      Besides, a guy can only contribute to so many projects, ya know? But thanks for asking.

    12. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by N1KO · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can include a web browser and a web site design program! It would be so cool because it would take lots of space and nobody would use it.

      Most people don't use PIM software, something that stores email addresses is good enough.

      Even if most people did want PIM, it would be better to have separate programs that integrate well than one big program that does a whole bunch of things and fails at all of them.

    13. Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! by protactin · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure where you're getting the IMAP idea from at all.

      Yes, Mozilla Calendar / Sunbird stores your calendars locally on disk in a "calendar" folder.
      But it also sends/retrieves calendars over WebDAV, which then are written to disk (possibly?).

      The FAQ says so.

  29. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You are trully beaten in this hall of mirrors."

    or are you?
    We are but two hydrogen atoms swirling in the maelstrom.

  30. Mirror , just in case by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just in case the server crashes and burns (like they usually do),I have put up a mirror.
    The mirror of http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releas es/ is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_220/www.mozilla.org /products/thunderbird/releases/
    The mirror of http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_220/www.mozilla.org /products/thunderbird/

    1. Re:Mirror , just in case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Do the Firefox and Thunderbird have internal consistancy checking on their packages? I saw no mention of any signatures or checksums to verify authenticity on their site. Not to be a prick and I do not wear a tin foil hat but it only takes getting burned once by a fake package to be aware that fakes can occur.

  31. Important UPGRADE Notes by illegalien · · Score: 5, Informative

    --From the thunderbird webpage--

    Upgraders: DO NOT install Mozilla Thunderbird into a directory containing program files from a previous version. Overwriting files from a previous release WILL cause problems. To re-use the directory of a previous install, the directory must be deleted and recreated, emptied, moved, or renamed. You should not file bugs in Bugzilla if you choose to ignore this step.

    The program directory does not contain profile information; any existing accounts, account settings, options, e-mail, and news messages will remain intact. This release does not require changes to your profile to function properly.

    Important: If you used a prior version of Thunderbird and installed themes OR extensions, you need to do the following or Thunderbird may NOT run properly. Find your profile directory. There should be a sub directory called chrome. Remove everything in chrome. This will not affect your mail data or preferences.

    1. Re:Important UPGRADE Notes by nandhp · · Score: 1

      If you forget to do that, it will keep your version number at 0.5... (Someone was complaining about that)

  32. Kmail for Windows by dorward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, there's no KMail build for Windows, so I wouldn't really know.

    There isn't? Oh no! I must do something about my imagination.

    1. Re:Kmail for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a build for Windows. It requires Cygwin and KDE for Cygwin to be installed; that's a separate, substantial installation.

      If you can download a reasonably-sized .exe file to install KMail in Windows, then let me know. Otherwise, Thunderbird comes out way ahead.

    2. Re:Kmail for Windows by Microlith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, that's a build for Cygwin.

      I can get Thunderbird on windows with no additional effort (IE just the installer.) For kmail I have to step through loading the POS that is Cygwin, load KDE, then load kmail and hope nothing fucks up on the way down.

    3. Re:Kmail for Windows by dorward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may have to jump through hoops, but a build for Cygwin is still a build for Windows.

      Otherwise we'll just have to say that all those old applications written in Visual Basic aren't Windows builds, they are VBRUN300.dll builds.

    4. Re:Kmail for Windows by Microlith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thunderbird is built for windows. It requires no more than is available with the base windows install.

      KMail on windows requires building a Cygwin install that may or may not NOT work at some point (I've had cygwin fail more often than not.)

      So until I can run an installer and get KMail on windows, it's not built for windows.

    5. Re:Kmail for Windows by Etyenne · · Score: 1
      I can get Thunderbird on windows with no additional effort (IE just the installer.) For kmail I have to step through loading the POS that is Cygwin, load KDE, then load kmail and hope nothing fucks up on the way down.

      Or you may use a Real OS® in the first place and be done with it.

      My sympathy if you can't for some reason (stuck-up employer policy, legacy application, etc).

      --
      :wq
    6. Re:Kmail for Windows by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Arrogance like this is one major reason I stay away from *nix based OSes.

      Check that attitude at the door and you may find the rest of the world more welcoming.

    7. Re:Kmail for Windows by armando_wall · · Score: 1

      Arrogance like this is one major reason I stay away from *nix based OSes.

      That'a a very poor reason.

    8. Re:Kmail for Windows by scrytch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > a build for Cygwin is still a build for Windows.

      It absolutely is not. It requires the (questionably licensed) cygwin DLL, so it essentially runs under the cygwin runtime, causing it to be brittle and slow slow slow. Apps running under cygwin have a hard heap limit (I have been screwed running perl over large datasets this way) as well as DLL relocation problems.

      KDE should compile okay for MinGW, which can be said to truly be a Windows port, but its main problem is the availability of a free Qt: X11 only. Personally I can't understand why there isn't also a native port of the X11 client libs to windows either -- the server has been implemented dozens of times over after all.

      > Otherwise we'll just have to say that all those old applications written in Visual Basic aren't Windows builds, they are VBRUN300.dll builds.

      I don't think in most circles you'll get away with calling a (non-native) VB application a "native" windows application either. At least the VB runtime is maintained by more than one guy.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    9. Re:Kmail for Windows by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Come on, this is Slashdot. Run by OSDN and running news stories with a bias towards Open Source, Linux and other Unix-like OS's. You've got to expect a fair bit of hostility to MS users around here.

    10. Re:Kmail for Windows by Microlith · · Score: 1

      It's a fine reason.

      I encounter it every time I have a question, whether or not I've "RTFM" as I'm usually greeted with.

      It's also the matter of being associated with a group of people who have shown themselves to be arrogant, condescending, rude, inconsiderate, and otherwise boorish in their conduct. It's not all of them but it sure is the loudest.

      This is why my latest experiment has been done with FreeBSD.

    11. Re:Kmail for Windows by Etyenne · · Score: 1
      Arrogance like this is one major reason I stay away from *nix based OSes.

      I think you should get a sense of humor.

      Here a smily for you :

      :)

      Are you feeling any better now ?

      --
      :wq
    12. Re:Kmail for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It requires the (questionably licensed) cygwin DLL,

      What's questionable about it? It's GPL with a linking exception for other OSI-approved licenses, so for example you can port a BSD-licensed program to Cygwin without it being 'infected'. If you want to use it in non-OSS projects you can buy a commercial license. Please explain, with examples, why this is a problem.

      so it essentially runs under the cygwin runtime, causing it to be brittle and slow slow slow.

      Brittle? Solider than many native Windows apps.
      Slow? I've never had any speed problems; Windows plus Cygwin runs faster for me than FreeBSD's Linux compatibility mode, for example.

      Please either support your arguments or take your trolling somewhere else.

    13. Re:Kmail for Windows by armando_wall · · Score: 1

      I encounter it every time I have a question, whether or not I've "RTFM" as I'm usually greeted with.

      I see you point. But that's not the OS's fault, nor exclusive of the *nix world.

      It's also the matter of being associated with a group of people who have shown themselves to be arrogant, condescending, rude, inconsiderate, and otherwise boorish in their conduct. It's not all of them but it sure is the loudest.

      They don't need to be considerate. You are not paying them. However, if you are like me, you'll search for your answers in other sites until you find a place you feel comfortable with, or pay for support.

      I understand what you mean, man, but my point is, you use the OS because it fits your technical needs, not your social needs. Anyways, it's a free world.

    14. Re:Kmail for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sympathy if you can't for some reason (stuck-up employer policy, legacy application, etc).

      What about "tried it, didn't like it, went back to Windows"?

      I use Cygwin to give me a decent command-line environment (I disagree with the grandparent's line that it's a POS), and I keep Linux and BSD installations on another box so I can log into them over Cygwin/X for development work, but so far I just prefer Windows' UI and applications for everyday work. Damn, I'll never be a real geek at this rate...

    15. Re:Kmail for Windows by Etyenne · · Score: 1
      What about "tried it, didn't like it, went back to Windows"?

      You have my sympathy too.










      :) <-- obligatory smily for the humor-impaired

      --
      :wq
    16. Re:Kmail for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting license.

      It seems that with the GPL, Cywin's license, the LGPL and the BSD license, the scope of different usage's rights is quite well covered..

    17. Re:Kmail for Windows by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Apps running under cygwin have a hard heap limit (I have been screwed running perl over large datasets this way)
      Why were you running the Cygwin port of Perl rather than a native Windows version like the ActiveState distribution?
    18. Re:Kmail for Windows by ibbey · · Score: 1

      It's a fine reason.

      I encounter it every time I have a question, whether or not I've "RTFM" as I'm usually greeted with.


      Certainly, there are projects & people that can be rude, but overall, the linux community is quite supportive of newbies. But it's important to remember that you are not paying these people to support you. They are doing it out of courtesy, so if you don't show some appreciation for it, you should not expect them to be helpful.

      RTFM, search the archives, and search Google before you ask a question. If you are unable to find the answer on your own, then say where you've searched when you post. If you find the answer, but you are confused, post the relevent link, and explain your confusion. Most importantly, ask a detailed question, -use a relevent subject- (there's nothing I find more annoyoing then a mailing list post with a subject like "Help!!!"), and make sure you provide enough ingformation that someone can reasonably answer your question. If you do these things, you will almost never get a rude response to even the most basic questions.

      It's also the matter of being associated with a group of people who have shown themselves to be arrogant, condescending, rude, inconsiderate, and otherwise boorish in their conduct. It's not all of them but it sure is the loudest.

      This is why my latest experiment has been done with FreeBSD.


      This is silly. The VAST majority of Linux users are not "arrogant, condescending, rude, inconsiderate, and otherwise boorish". Percentage wise, I guarantee you that there are just as many asshole BSD users as there are Linux users. I suggest you consider your own attitudes before you blame others for their rudeness.

    19. Re:Kmail for Windows by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > Why were you running the Cygwin port of Perl rather than a native Windows version like the ActiveState distribution?

      Because it was using POE, and POE appears to be broken in several ways on Win32. I used the simple Wheel::ReadWrite to implement a 'cat' command, reading \*STDIN to \*STDOUT, and it simply hung when I tested it on Windows. Same code worked fine without alteration on cygwin. I have better things to do than to debug other people's libraries. Anyway, I'm switching from POE to Stackless Python, which I am running natively on Win32 now, so it's no longer an issue. 'course I'm switching my whole development platform away from Win32 as soon as I can swing it, so I'll certainly have less problems after that...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  33. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sad thing is, only we know the truth, or maybe someone with admin privelages can look up the ip logs and confirm the beauty of it all.

    You in NZ? it's 12:20 here is australia - land of trolls.

  34. OS X Mail by Troy · · Score: 1

    For those who are running Thunderbird on OS X, what made you choose this over Apple's Mail program? What features does Thunderbird offer that Mail does not?

    Thanks!
    -Troy

    1. Re:OS X Mail by mattjb0010 · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those who are running Thunderbird on OS X, what made you choose this over Apple's Mail program? What features does Thunderbird offer that Mail does not?

      Usenet. I'm quite happy with Mail.app for email, and Thunderbird for reading newsgroups.

    2. Re:OS X Mail by revscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not much. Mail.app is much more elegant than Thunderbird, but it doesn't provide a newsgroup reader. I stick with Mail for - ahem - mail, and use Thunderbird for usenet. In fact, the #1 reason that I don't use TBird for Mail is that it doesn't integrate with Address Book.

    3. Re:OS X Mail by Mr+M · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thunderbird offers HTML email capabilities whereas Mail will only do "Rich Text" which is a very small subset. I tried Thunderbird on OSX as I loved it on Windows but I'm holding off until they integrate with the address book and show the number of new messages on the dock icon.

    4. Re:OS X Mail by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One very annoying problem I found with Apple's Mail is that it hides server error messages from you. And it hides them very effectively! I found absolutely no way to see why the server rejected a mail.

      In case of an error, Apple's Mail offers you a "friendly" drop-down list of SMTP servers, suggesting you try another server. While indeed, the "Relaying denied" error from using the wrong SMTP server may be the most common one, there are cases when that is not the problem. You then have to setup another mail program to be able to find out what is wrong.

      When people I know have trouble with email, they call me. But they cannot tell me the error message. That would only be good if I could/would charge by the minute for incoming calls...

    5. Re:OS X Mail by tsq · · Score: 1

      Well, to play devil's advocate, the mail.app has a nifty plugin for accessing hotmail, as well as the standard OS X integration.

      --
      This sig is Y2K compliant.
    6. Re:OS X Mail by twbecker · · Score: 1

      Wow. I love TB, but at least for now it's Usenet features are nothing to brag about. If the Mac platform doesn't offer something better for reading newsgroups, I feel for you.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    7. Re:OS X Mail by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      For those who are running Thunderbird on OS X, what made you choose this over Apple's Mail program?

      Well, I'll tell you why I use Mail.app instead of Thunderbird. I use Thunderbird on Windows and Linux, but I chose to use Mail.app on Mac OS X with the reason being while Thunderbird is a better mail client IMO, it has two issues holding me back: 1) it is sucks up too much memory when compared to Mail.app and 2) it doesn't have a visual notification when new mail arrives whereas Mail.app does that nicely.

      I suppose I could live with the first issue, but the second one is really a show stopper for me.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    8. Re:OS X Mail by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 1

      Every file and directory in my home dirs at work and school look like a mailbox to Mail.app, which makes it pretty annoying when I actually want to select the few legitimate mailboxes that I made with procmail. If there's a way to see just certain IMAP mailboxes on the right side panel, I'd like to know. Until then, I'll stick with Thunderbid.

      Thunderbird also let's me use the same mail program between my linux pc, iBook, and work. Which means I don't have to fish around for options.

      Mail.app also seems less responsive for some reason. I've noticed the same thing with iCal, some of the MacOS X applications just aren't fast. Maybe it's because my machine is only a 800MHz G3, but with 640MB, there should be plenty of RAM.

    9. Re:OS X Mail by nikster · · Score: 1

      well i just tried that, and i get this message (which you can select for convenient copy-pasting):
      The sender address xxxx@xxxxxxxx.com was rejected by the server
      The server response was: 5.1.0 ... From address does not match authentication.
      You can try to send using a different server. All messages will use this server until you quit or change your network settings.

      and options to edit the message, to use another SMTP server, or to try again later.

      i find that pretty comprehensive information. maybe you need to upgrade to Panther ;)

      my take on Mail.app is that it is getting better. it's always had beauty, and it looks like Apple is continuing to improve it. the latest release fixed all my problems with Mail.app - most prominently the bug where it would needlessly create (modal!) dialogs when it could not reach a server. the new version discreetly (but not too discreetly) displays a "connection interrupted" icon next to the account name and won't check that account again until you click the icon. nice.
      other nice features are threaded view for mails, and the clickable replied-to icon. if you replied to a message, Mail will display a little arrow next to the message. click the arrow and you get directly to your response. it's brilliant and simple.

    10. Re:OS X Mail by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Informative

      for newsgroups i have written a small app called OSXnews looks like Mail.app uses KHTML and supports a lot of the features needed for non-binary newsgroup browsing. It is still a Beta in development but you can find it at : osxnews.sf.net

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    11. Re:OS X Mail by li99sh79 · · Score: 1

      For those who are running Thunderbird on OS X, what made you choose this over Apple's Mail program? What features does Thunderbird offer that Mail does not?
      I use thunderbird on my OSX machine because I had previously used Thunderbird on my WinXP machine and I'm used to the app. There's just something about mail.app that bothers me. I'm not sure what it is, but I've tried to use it on several occaisions and I've always gone back to what I was using before, either Eudora or Thunderbird. Maybe I'll give Mail.app a try when my new 15" 1.5ghz PowerBook shows up. :)
      -sam

      --
      I was just here, where did I go?
    12. Re:OS X Mail by phasefx · · Score: 1

      I wish Thunderbird had spring-loaded folders. What I really wish for is for a quick way to save an email to a folder after viewing it based on email address (I could do this pine).

      -- Jason

    13. Re:OS X Mail by ageitgey · · Score: 1

      I use Thunderbird on OSX instead of Mail.app because I like the interface better. For some reason I always found Mail.app awkward with the accounts tray on the right. I have a lot of email accounts and I can manage them all fast and confortably with Thunderbird (and the "Check All" extension installed - why is this not default?) while I found that somewhat awkward in Mail.app.

      That being said, Mail.app is fine and I'm sure I could have liked it if I got used to it. To be honest, I would really just like to have KMail for OSX more than anything. It's so fast and slick.

      --
      Uninnovate - Only the finest in engineering.
    14. Re:OS X Mail by geek · · Score: 1

      I get better junk mail handling, TB is ten times faster at checking mail. No one has been able to explain to me yet why it takes Mail.app a full 20 seconds or more to check POP3 while TB does it in less than 5 second. I'm now using IMAP and like TB's way of handling it.

      Mail.app feels like a childs email client. It's restrictive and when I'm using it I feel like I'm wrestling with it constantly. There is an element of that in TB but I've been able to find extensions for the things that bother me.

    15. Re:OS X Mail by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      For those who are running Thunderbird on OS X, what made you choose this over Apple's Mail program? What features does Thunderbird offer that Mail does not?

      I have two different IMAP accounts, along with a POP3 account. I don't like how Mail.app combines the IMAP folders for my separate accounts into one jumbled listing - I prefer to have "Account A"'s folders separate from "Account B"'s folders, in other words.

      Mail.app will let me see the separate Inboxes for each account, but this is not the case for the other IMAP folders.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    16. Re:OS X Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lost mail with Mail.app once. That was pretty much it for me. Also I don't really need to upgrade to 10.3 so the only way I can get a newer version of my applications is to download thunderbird/firefox rather than Mail.app/Safari.

    17. Re:OS X Mail by EuropeanSwallow · · Score: 1

      I use IMAP. Mail.app does not honour the server-side .mailboxlist file, so all the files in the remote server appear as mailboxes. This is EXTREMELY annoying, and made me move to Thunderbird right away.

    18. Re:OS X Mail by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      i just tried that, and i get this message...
      maybe you need to upgrade to Panther

      Glad to hear they corrected this with Panther. Indeed, I saw that problem on 10.2 systems.

    19. Re:OS X Mail by AcornWeb · · Score: 0

      Wow, almost exactly what I've been looking for!

      Do you need comments/suggestions now or after you finish up school?

      And do you want them through email or the forums?

      Noticed a couple of things that seem like they could use fixing, so I'll keep you posted.

      Finally, do you need help on the project? I've done some Cocoa work (not a whole lot) and I'm willing to help if you want me to. But if this is your baby, let me know.

      --
      Your Windows PC is my other computer.
  35. Compacting Mail Folders with Mozilla Mail Client by locknloll · · Score: 5, Informative

    Right-click the folder's name and use "Compact this Folder" from time to time. Removes the leftovers from old mails from the index file. Eudora has the same stuff, for example, so it's not an example for a sucky mail client, but for an architecture I don't really understand because I'm not a developer :-D

    --
    -- Power corrupts, but PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.
  36. Re:My day just keeps getting better by FerretFrottage · · Score: 0

    mutually exclusive....Nah...you can still do both at the same time, it's just easier with a wireless keyboard and mouse

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  37. Nitpick++ by trezor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to be a Nitpick, but can I download the KDE environment for Win32, so I can compile KMail on my workmachine running Windows XP?

    Mozilla might not be perfect, but at least it's platform independent.

    And not to nitpick even further, but if there is one thing Outlook is, it is responsive. Still doesn't mean I would use it for anything in the world.

    Nothing wrong with tight code, but for some applications speed isn't everything. Mail is probably one of those things where speed really doesn't matter that much.

    And putting issues aside, Opera's M2 email-client is very fast as well (yes Opera has issues. For the web I exclusively use Opera, but M2 has protocol flaws).

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    1. Re:Nitpick++ by scrytch · · Score: 2, Informative

      > And not to nitpick even further, but if there is one thing Outlook is, it is responsive.

      Clearly you haven't experienced the joy of searching messages. Especially if there's 5000+ messages in the folder. Thunderbird manages to do it as I type, and I can still do other mail operations. Outlook 2003 still single-threads it and prevents me from even composing mail while it's busy doing it.

      Opera indeed makes both of them look slow, but dear lord the bugs are heinous. I stick with Outlook where I have to use it: Outlook 2003 is great for organization, since I have several folders sorted and grouped (not so subtle RFE hint) differently.

      I wonder, why not have a mail application use SQLite for the folder store? Or an arbitrary ODBC or JDBC URL? You get all that organization for free in such a case (including GROUP BY), to say nothing of more or less guaranteed data integrity...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    2. Re:Nitpick++ by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Not to be a Nitpick, but can I download the KDE environment for Win32, so I can compile KMail on my workmachine running Windows XP?

      Yes, you can.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    3. Re:Nitpick++ by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Try Lookout for searching in Outlook.

      I do find it kinda funny that Microsoft has all these information-at-your-fingertips, grand-unified, SQL-filesystem, Google-killer Search plans, but they haven't even got simple email searching going after all these years.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    4. Re:Nitpick++ by nathanh · · Score: 1
      And not to nitpick even further, but if there is one thing Outlook is, it is responsive.

      Are you kidding? The work machines use Outlook and they're incredibly slow. These desktops are less than 12 months old. Here are the typical daily slowdowns.

      I have local-side filters to sort email from mailing lists. When a mail arrives, the entire interface locks up while Outlook sorts it! I can be typing a letter and have it lockup for almost 10 seconds while Outlook gets its act together.

      In the morning when I start Outlook (forced logouts overnight) I can often have 100+ mails waiting to be sorted. Takes at least 5 minutes during which time Outlook is unresponsive.

      Instantiating a new e-mail has noticeable lag. Presumably because the default settings use Word for the editor.

      Finding a mail in my 15,000+ Unsorted folder takes upwards of 5 minutes. This isn't exactly a large folder. On my home computer (Linux with Evolution) I have 50,000+ folders and finding an e-mail is faster by an order of magnitude (mere seconds). And I used to complain that Evolution was slow compared to mutt!

      Even viewing that 15,000+ Unsorted folder is slow. The interface doesn't paint properly for at least 5 seconds. Then when it does paint, you can see it struggling to fill the list.

      Printing has a 10 second delay. Hit print and wait... and wait... and wait... oh, there's the "I'm printing" dialog. Great.

      Any HTML infested e-mail causes an interface lockup for a second or two. It's even better if the HTML references an offsite image, because then it throws the proxy authentication dialog and you must respond before Outlook will work again. Bloody annoying when you're arrow keying through a folder.

      Now I'm sure somebody will respond with "that doesn't happen for me, your desktop must not be configured properly". This is a large government department - I'm talking several 10s of 1000s of identical Windows desktops - so if they can't get it right then what hope is there for the average home user?

  38. Re:My day just keeps getting better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coding/opensource and chicks are mutually exclusive.

    Yeah, I made that mistake last year. I still write code for her, but I get journal papers out of it, not dates. Thankfully I'm a fast learner and I've actually been out with a few girls since then.

  39. Any day now... by knewman_1971 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As much as I'd like to get away from Outlook, TBird just ain't gonna cut it for me. Having a different set of folders for each email account is something I can't get over. If I could only run Evolution in Windows, I'd be a happy panda. (BTW, please don't tell me to go change prefs.js.obscure.file.whatever. I'm niot interested in hacking my email client to make it work.)

    --
    where is the "I feel for ya, but that's some funny ass shit" moderation?
    1. Re:Any day now... by Br00se · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what I love about Thunderbird. I only have 7 different pop accounts, but I LOVE having different inboxes, trash cans, rulesets, etc. for each account.

      It may be too much work for you, but what is wrong is creating filters to dump you messages into a common local folder?

    2. Re:Any day now... by maskedbishounen · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same situation at the parent poster. I have quite a few accounts, and I'd much rather have them dumped into one place with colored highlighting than clicking on different inboxes (I hate having the folder plane on, in the first place). It seems (at least to me) to be much more productive when I can click the pretty colors that tell me when mails are useful/important, than trying to figure out exactly which inbox gets priority (Not that you should take a productivity tip from someone reading /. ;P).

      That said, I have tried to filter messages into one common folder, and mailed miseribly. The main reason being what you're allowed to filter. The best I was able to come up with is if my address was in the To:, CC:, or related areas. For mailing lists and the like, and some online services, this failed very quickly.

      I'd like to see the ability to filter by account, so that I can easily dump personal mails into the same inbox. No mess there, as everything will be dumped that way. Also useful for flagging purposes, say an address for various logs and want them in your normal work inbox.

      Then again, I may be missing something that's insanely obvious here. I'll also admit, I haven't tried 0.6 yet. Perhaps someone can point me in the right direction?

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    3. Re:Any day now... by symphony5 · · Score: 1

      I think a simple filter can solve your problem. See my comment above.

    4. Re:Any day now... by horza · · Score: 1

      This obviously needs to be a clear configuration option near the top of the list. Around half the people want email to go all into one folder, and the other half (including myself) want different accounts to go into different folders. Having the different folders was one of the reasons I moved to Thunderbird.

      Phillip.

  40. Already there! by locknloll · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    -- Power corrupts, but PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.
  41. Warning - Good for SysAdmins, But be careful users by Mr+Very+Angry · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember that Thunderbird is still pre 1.0 release which means that you should be prepared for "features" (bugs).
    I switched my own laptop from XP-Outlook to Thunderbird 0.5 a few weeks ago, and I am delighted with the huge gain in performance, the improved virus protection, spam filtering as well as the fact that the new platform is Open-source.
    However, when I did the import from Outlook, it mangled some of the email address and attachments, so I keep Outlook for backup purposes, so I can check old emails. I would not switch back, but just keep a record of all the files you use. Of course, we are all careful and audit-trail all of our work, aren't we!
    To sum up: great product and project, but handle the delivery with care.

  42. It's not about standards, it's about XUL by revscat · · Score: 4, Informative
    Mozilla's success will ultimately happen -- or not -- because of the success or failure of XUL. Standards compliance is not reason enough for companies or individuals to switch to Mozilla, especially in large numbers. The only truly defining characteristic of Mozilla is XUL. If that catches on, Mozilla will survive. If it doesn't, it will remain a niche player, and will probably fade in significance.

    In fact, turn IE users away at the door.

    This is utopian and dumb. If you are running a business there is no way you would be so stupid as to turn away 90+% of your customers at the door simply because you don't like the way they are dressed. Idealistic, yes. Web standards are well and good, but the real world intervenes.

    1. Re:It's not about standards, it's about XUL by mst76 · · Score: 1
      Mozilla's success will ultimately happen -- or not -- because of the success or failure of XUL. Standards compliance is not reason enough for companies or individuals to switch to Mozilla, especially in large numbers. The only truly defining characteristic of Mozilla is XUL. If that catches on, Mozilla will survive. If it doesn't, it will remain a niche player, and will probably fade in significance.
      You're forgetting another factor: Mozilla and its descendants are the defacto standard browsers for the free OSes. (I don't have hard numbers, but I suspect Moz has many more users than Konq or Opera.) If a significant amount of desktop users turn to Linux (say 10%+) it will get harder to ignore Mozilla users, regardless of XUL.
    2. Re:It's not about standards, it's about XUL by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      if you are running a business there is no way you would be so stupid as to turn away 90+% of your customers at the door simply because you don't like the way they are dressed

      You got that right. However, this hot website rewards mozilla users.

    3. Re:It's not about standards, it's about XUL by revscat · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting another factor: Mozilla and its descendants are the defacto standard browsers for the free OSes.

      No, I'm not. In fact, if anything that's another strike against Mozilla. The existance of Konqueror and Opera divide Mozilla's possible market share. While an overall increase in the number of Linux installs would, of course, increase their market share, this doesn't seem to be happening nor is there evidence it will in the forseeable future. In other words, such discussions are speculative, no matter how much we might wish them to come true.

      XUL is fairly powerful. I still feel that it and it alone will determine Mozilla's long term success or failure.

  43. Re:My day just keeps getting better by trezor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am sure your date will go really well if you inform the cute girl that you equal her asking you out, with a "technology preview" of a mail-reader.

    *grin*

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  44. What is new? by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Informative
    A few things are mentioned in the what's new page. Some are nice, but it's not clear for me whether the things I need to switch from Eudora are there now:

    • Can the filters now do more than one action?
    • Does it remember the folder state
    • Can I modify the From address by simply tyoing it in the From: line, without creating an account/identity for it?
    • Can we now move mails folder (on Windows) to somewhere else, and just launch it with an argument telling it where the profile folder is?
    • Does it still have that insane default folder structure? (c:\Documents and Settings\username\Application Data\Thunderbird\Profiles\default\sr5qf9vq.slt\Mai l\ etc. !!)


    There were many things I liked a lot last time I looked. But these problems prevented me from switching.
    1. Re:What is new? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Informative
      • Can the filters now do more than one action?
        • Yeah. They could do that last release too.
      • Does it remember the folder state?
        • Not quite sure what you're getting at, but I think it does (it'll re-launch your Inbox at the same viewpoint you left it and stuff like that)
      • Can I modify the From address by simply tyoing it in the From: line, without creating an account/identity for it?
        • No, I really doubt it. Though you could do a temporary address change in your Accounts settings. And pray that you remember to change it back... =/
      • Can we now move mails folder (on Windows) to somewhere else, and just launch it with an argument telling it where the profile folder is?
        • Unsure. Ask again later.
      • Does it still have that insane default folder structure? (c:\Documents and Settings\username\Application Data\Thunderbird\Profiles\default\sr5qf9vq.slt\Mai l\ etc. !!)
        • I prefer to start with ~/.thunderbird/default/, but I'm pretty sure Yes.
      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:What is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      filters do more than one action: yes
      remember the folder state: probably
      modify the from address: dropdown box listing all your accounts
      setting up mail folder elsewhere: yes
      insane default folder structure: yes

      I switched from Eudora 6 (combined with POPFile to do spamfiltering and email classification) to Thunderbird. I use multiple email accounts. I use a custom profile directory (binary copied to my laptop and v.v. when I travel).
      I'm happy with Thunderbird.

      There are still a few things that Eudora does better: HTML display, Filter Reports, using arbitrary tags (rather than a predefined set) to label messages, and searching across accounts.
      Thunderbird on the other hand is free, and has nifty mailviews.

    3. Re:What is new? by dereklam · · Score: 1
      • Can I modify the From address by simply tyoing it in the From: line, without creating an account/identity for it?

      Is this possible in Eudora 6? I run Eudora on my Powerbook, and when I start typing on the From: line, I get an error message:

      That text cannot be modified

      [8:2803]

      I vaguely remember finding a (PC-only) plugin to enable this functionality, but I don't remember where. Is such a plugin still required?

    4. Re:What is new? by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      I have 5 on a PC. Yes, I think I had to first enable that somewhere in the configuration. But that was years ago. Unlike other Windows apps, the config. is just an plain .ini file, which I copy around between directories or machines.

    5. Re:What is new? by totalXSive · · Score: 1

      Can I modify the From address by simply tyoing it in the From: line, without creating an account/identity for it? Yes, but not easily. Have a read of the Multiple Identity Support page (this is also going into Mozilla 1.7).

      You will need to edit prefs.js for every address you want to add. The document does suggest that a forthcoming version of Thunderbird will have a UI for this.

    6. Re:What is new? by xandroid · · Score: 1

      "Does it still have that insane default folder structure? (c:\Documents and Settings\username\Application Data\Thunderbird\Profiles\default\sr5qf9vq.slt\Mai l\ etc. !!)"

      Yes, but it's for security reasons. Since all Thunderbird users don't have the same file structure for their settings and things, it makes it harder for nasty bugs security exploits to start changing things on you.

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
  45. One local mail tree? by jez9999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    *sigh*. Is it EVER gonna get a single local mail tree for all POP accounts feature? Is it even on the list of planned enhancements? Until it gets this, I WILL NOT SWITCH TO IT. Nor will quite a few other people. I wish the developers would get a clue.

    This issue pisses me off, a lot. Because I'd love to switch from OE, but I won't put up with not having this feature.

    1. Re:One local mail tree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, agreed - I use thunderbird at work despite this "feature" but at home Evolution gets my vote. I dont think they really give a shit about it at all which is stupid.

      As a side note, your link to bugzilla gives "Sorry, links to Bugzilla from Slashdot are disabled." He he!

    2. Re:One local mail tree? by twbecker · · Score: 1

      Who knows. It's no secret that plenty of people have been clamoring for it, myself included. I've made do with the current behavior for now, as I hate OE, but I agree that it's frustrating to see what is by all accounts a highly requested feature, getting ignored.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    3. Re:One local mail tree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. OE sucks. I switched to St. Ides years ago and never looked back.

    4. Re:One local mail tree? by Seven001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whoever modded your post as flamebait needs to get a clue. Its not flamebait, its the truth. If they want people to switch from OE they need to add a single mail tree. Period. I am another one that won't switch until they do.

      Another thing that annoys me, not quite enough to keep me from using it if they do the local mail tree thing, is the assuming of outgoing mail server. It assumes on every account you add after the first that it will use the first's outgoing mail server. That is NOT something that should be assumed, it should be a selectable OPTION with the ability to add a new outgoing mailserver for that account.

      I'll probably get modded as flamebait as well, but to me this new version did absolutely nothing. Yeah I'm sure they fixed bugs and tweaked it a bit, but I don't see how that little bit of stuff warranted a new version.

    5. Re:One local mail tree? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Whatever floats your boat. One of the things i LIKE about Tb is that it doesn't put all my emails from 3 or 4 different POP3 accounts into the same folder

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:One local mail tree? by symphony5 · · Score: 1

      Can't you just create a local inbox folder, then write a filter for each of your other inboxes to automatically move all incoming messages into the local inbox folder? That's what I do, and it works like a charm. For the rule, use something like "sender is not fslajlfdwoief" -- unless you know someone named fslajlfdwoief, of course.

    7. Re:One local mail tree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is post is a prime example how to realy piss off open source developers.
      Angry shouting won't bring the features you miss and telling everybody that this is the one must-have feature for you to switch only makes people laugh at you and go away shaking their heads.
      The ones writing code set their priorities, to my knowledge Scott McGregor, the single developer of Thunderbird isn't even paid by the Mozilla Foundation.

      If you really hate OE that much, pay somebody to implement the single local mail tree.

    8. Re:One local mail tree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also like it to have seperate inboxes for each account. Allows me to filter spam much more effectively. I agree with the above post just create a local inbox and a filter to copy or move the messages from the other inboxes there.

    9. Re:One local mail tree? by cortana · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you can do this already, if you don't mind editing your prefs.js file by hand. You can give each identity a different incoming POP server.

    10. Re:One local mail tree? by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      If you want them in different folders, that's easy to do with filters.

      I do not want different pop accounts in different folders, so TB is unusable for me.

    11. Re:One local mail tree? by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Whoever's still using POP3 needs to get a clue. And the clue is IMAP....

    12. Re:One local mail tree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This issue pisses me off, a lot.

      Life's too short to get pissed off about a mail client.

      Have you read that bug report? This is a hard problem, and they're still trying to figure out how to do it. You can't write the code until you know what it should do.

      So chill, and as someone suggested in there, maybe you should get together with other people who want this and put a bounty on it.

    13. Re:One local mail tree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

      I prefer POP3, even though I run my own mailserver at a colo. For one thing, I like having all of my email local as I don't need to access it from various places around the world. Second, I feel comfortable with qpopper, but I don't feel comfortable with any of the available linux IMAP servers because there are *so many* of them and they all work differently and have hangups with various pieces of software, etc. It's just plain easier to install a good POP server than it is to install a good and reliable IMAP server.

      POP3 is just as valid and usable as IMAP. Each serve a purpose and that is defined by the person using it.

    14. Re:One local mail tree? by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      Why do people always try to force their standards and opinions on everyone else? I've used POP3 for a long time and I don't have a problem with it. I like to go by the "if it isn't broken, don't fix it" saying. I'm sure I'll be using IMAP, but I will switch to it when and because _I_ want to switch, not because some big mouth says I should.

    15. Re:One local mail tree? by jacrawf · · Score: 1
      One quibble is that most IMAP clients know that people expect that from POP3 and will usually cache all messages, or parts of messages, locally.

      However, you're right that there are few reliable IMAP servers that deal with mbox files. However, if you felt like switching your MTA to Postfix or Exim, or your MDA to procmail, you could use Courier IMAP or Binc IMAP on Maildir stores, both of which are incredibly stable (been using Courier in production for years and Binc in production for the last 6 months) very bug-free and highly compatible with pretty much every IMAP client I've tried especially Binc which is a lot more flexible in mailbox naming semantics than Courier. Both are pretty lightweight and fast as well, so if you're concerned about server resources they'll please you greatly.

      I am particularly fond of Maildir stores because of the lower chance of mailbox corruption and the ease of converting them to an mbox file should the need present itself. I'm fond of squeezing every bit of stability and crash-proofness out of my servers as possible.

    16. Re:One local mail tree? by BZ · · Score: 1

      The option is there, under the "Advanced" button in account settings..... where it belongs.

    17. Re:One local mail tree? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      if i can use TB filters to separate accounts i dont see why you cant use them to consolidate.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    18. Re:One local mail tree? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The price of using pre-release software. For what it's worth, an overhaul of the SMTP UI is planned. From the Thunderbird plans:

      Multiple SMTP Server Overhaul

      We currently support multiple SMTP servers. However, the way we associate SMTP servers with accounts and how the user picks the outgoing SMTP server to use is a mess. We need to look at the issues involved with how we present and manage multiple SMTP servers to the user.

  46. Re:My day just keeps getting better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just had to tell it someone, right?

    x

  47. Parent is a Windows-user! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • I use Kontact/KMail .... but I'm always up for trying new things if they have really made a nice interface.

    This post is a hoax. Only Windows-users think like this!

    /ducks anonymously

  48. database back-end by chrisvdb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I would love as a feature in Thunderbird, is the use of a database back-end.

    When you get a mail the headers are parsed and stored in a database... the sender and other receipents are then linked to your contacts that are also stored in a database. Mail folders like we know them now are then just a certain view of your mail (all mail of the last week, unanswered mail, mail from contact X (also if he changed email address in the meantime!), and other user-defined properties (e.g. regarding project Y)).

    Evolution does this to some extend (virtual folders and db storage). But they've stopped where it got really interesting (like the linking to contacts, tasks, user-defined properties, ...).

    It would also be nice if this db can be remote; this way a webmail application could use the same database. In some way this would then be a new IMAP server... but with more flexibility, support for complex queries, virtual folder, and not mail-only.

    Does anybody else think this would be interesting?

    1. Re:database back-end by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      database ... Does anybody else think this would be interesting?

      No. I understand why you find it interesting, and why some mail clients use databse storage, but I don't find the benefits are worth giving up the huge advantage of plain text storage.

      I will definitely NOT use a mail client which doesn't use plain text storage. I want to be able to occasionally use text search tools on the raw files, I want to be able to read these files even if the application that created them is not installed, I want to be able to read them on any platform, I want to be able to read bits of these files if the hard disk badly crashed.

    2. Re:database back-end by chrisvdb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe this is not mutually exclusive... keep the email content in raw text files, and put the metadata in a database (and possibly index the email content).

      Anyway, at this point I would trust my email to an application that doens't allow me to access it through text-based tools either. But I do hope that computing will once evolve to the point that we can actually work with them without caring what's under the hood. (Like I do with my car now...)

      We're in the information age, and having tools that help us manage this huge amount of information in a not-too-intrusive way are becoming more and more necessary... having a well-structured db with all your emails (and maybe other means of communications, like sms/voice calls/etc), linked to other personal info would be such a tool (for me).

      Chris.

    3. Re:database back-end by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      It exists, it's called Exchange server. OWA for webmail and Outlook 2003 for local client. Outlook 2003 defaults to blocking executables by default, but unfortunatly still uses IE for its preview engine (sigh). Luckily OWA works with Mozilla darn well so I don't have to risk infection, it only lacks meeting notification which is an ActiveX plugin for IE clients but has no equivilant for degraded clients.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:database back-end by chrisvdb · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is (certainly partially) true. But at the same time it is not an option for many people because it's not standards compliant, open and free.

      Open being the most important there, since you (well, I for sure) want to avoid a look-in situation when you put all the effort in adding your personal information into the application.

      If the api/protocol would be completely standardized, then exchange would idd be a valid option for me. At this point it is not.

      Chris.

    5. Re:database back-end by tetrode · · Score: 1

      Yes - for a (non-free) implementation for Outlook see Nelson Email Organiser Pro.

      I have over 1 Gb of e-mails in some 20 PST's that I can search in literally seconds based upon sender, receiver, content, type of attachment and age.

      very nice application.

    6. Re:database back-end by afidel · · Score: 1

      What standard doesn't Exchange follow? It's X.500, SMTP, POP3, IMAP, and LDAP compliant (maybe there are minor inconsistencies between the standards and Exchange's implementation but nothing world shattering, just the kinds of things almost all software that implements a large convoluted standard encounters) so there isn't much to complain about. Sure if you want full functionality you need a client that understands the advanced features but that's a problem with the open standards world not being up to snuff compared to Exchange, not Exchange failing to follow a standard. Just as Outlook added iCal support once the standard is finalized I'm sure that Exchange would support a usefull multiuser calandering standard if such a beast existed (it doesn't, dumping iCal's into a folder doesn't work, especially since large iCal's suck). Exchange is one of those MS products that is fairly difficult to bash for interoperability because it's so all inclusive that it works in just about any environment, and with Exchange 2003 it's hard to knock it for stability which was its historic weakness.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:database back-end by slyckshoes · · Score: 1

      I believe it's called Lotus Notes, but people don't seem to like it very much.

      I may be wrong, but I think that Notes is just an interface to a DB that is hosted remotely. It's very powerful, but I think that the user interface hinders it some.

    8. Re:database back-end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > I want to be able to occasionally use text search tools on the raw files,

      If you put your e-mail into a database, you don't need grep. You put it into a database so you can do better, faster, and more featureful searches. Want to search for a particular sender, you can do it. Want to search for a particular word in a subject, you can do it. Of course you can do those two things with grep, but you'll have to use regular expressions like "^Subject:(.*)search_word". While that isn't bad, it's a little awkward. When you want to do something like "search for all e-mails from bob that were also CC'ed to the boss but not my boss's boss" (yes, I just did that search Friday with my SQL-backed e-mail client), and doing plain-text searches becomes much harder. It took me 20 seconds with my database-backed e-mail client. How would you do that with grep? Putting mail, or really anything, into an SQL database is all about make searching easier.

    9. Re:database back-end by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      I wish they would documented the MAPI protocol a bit better so we could interoperate though.

      --
      :wq
    10. Re:database back-end by egoots · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought it already used an internal database backend.

      I was under the impression that the Mozilla Mail client uses Mozilla's "Mork" database engine to store all the messages as well as the address book data. I also assumed Thunderbird used the same infrastructure.

    11. Re:database back-end by egoots · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the Nelson Email Organizer (NEO) just adds its own indexes externally to the existing Outlook message store. It doesnt maintain its own database copies of the actual mail messages... Outlook (or Exchange) does that part

      It does however, give you an idea of the power of being able to provide additional indexes/info regarding the messages. Something that flat text files by themselves cannot do very well.

    12. Re:database back-end by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      If you put your e-mail into a database, you don't need grep

      I don't need it with a plain email client either. Eudora has no trouble doing the searches you describe on plain text files, using it's index.

      But if the computer crashed, and I only have some old Amiga or a 1985 Mac lying around or some DOS boot disk, and I need something from a mail right now, I can get at it if the files are plain text.

      Also, I sometimes do searches in the plain text because I'm looking for a too common word. Eudora or a database will get me far too many results; I would have to double-click on each individual result to open it, then find that word in the message, etc. Instead, I open the whole .mbx file in a viewer where I can very quickly hit F3 or / or whatever to jump to the next match. I used that several times for stuff in big mailing lists, where I knew I had read something some time ago, which I wanted to find.

      I quite like the idea in the previous comment of having the best of both worlds. That's sort of what email clients do with their indexes, but having the index in a more standard db format would be nice.

    13. Re:database back-end by AT · · Score: 1

      While mailboxes themselves are stardard mbox files, thunderbird (& mozilla mail) do use a database (of sorts) for index information. It's called mork, and its supposed to combine the benefits of a transactional database with those of a straight text file. Unfortunately, some would say it accomplishes neither.

    14. Re:database back-end by N1KO · · Score: 1

      Aren't databases meant to be reliable and easy to access with external tools? I'm very happy with maildir because I don't recieve much mail, if I recieved mail from many high traffic lists it would be nice to be able to store it in an SQL database.

    15. Re:database back-end by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      if the computer crashed, and I only have some old Amiga or a 1985 Mac lying around or some DOS boot disk, and I need something from a mail right now, I can get at it if the files are plain text.

      Believe it or not, Amiga YAM uses mbox files natively. I downloaded my Pine folders (from when ISP's gave you shell accounts, hah the good old days) and YAM took them straight in with no conversion. The ol' Miggy still hosts my continuous email archive going back to 1993.

    16. Re:database back-end by protactin · · Score: 1
      Yes this is right.. Thunderbird uses the painfully arcane mork format to store headers etc.

      However, each mail folder has its metainfo DB stored in a separate file which makes it a little less easier to implement virtual folders, I guess..

  49. He's right by grahamlee · · Score: 3, Funny
    I switched from some murky client which didn't exactly have a bright outlook

    No, outlook isn't very bright.

    1. Re:He's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find that that was indeed his humourous point.

    2. Re:He's right by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      That could be why the statement has been declared funny by the moderators, couldn't it?

      I've got Thunderbird around here, but don't use it much. The filters *are* very good, but for general user experience nothing much beats GNUMail. I get errors when building LUsernet that I haven't yet explored, so until then I use knode for abusenet luvverliness. I probably ought to update the TBird binary at some point given that I've got a rather ancient version. Then again, I may just check whether any other users are using it, and not bother if not :-).

  50. Exchange by pickapeppa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If only it could work with Exchange in a Networked environment. I am trapped by circumstance into hosting my organization's e-mail with Exchange on the server side and Outlook clients.

  51. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if I was on any other OS other then WinXP,

    Why do you have to use another OS before using WinXP?

    Since you have decided to use XP, your computing experience would be more efficient if you go straight into XP. That way you will eliminate that first step.

  52. The new icon doesn't scale by poulbailey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love the new artwork. It works great in the About box and as a banner on a webpage. It's good to see that Mozilla.org takes branding seriously. I don't think that it works well as an icon though.

    The new icon loses its bird-carrying-an-envelope meaning when scaled down. The first thing I thought of was a blue-haired LEGO guy and surely that's not good. The blue color also clashes slightly with the default Windows background color.

    Let's hope they tweak the smaller icon sizes for legibility.

  53. It follows the GTK theme by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

    Wow! That looks 100% better! Before it just didn't look right. Now it follows Mandrake's Galaxy theme and looks great.

  54. My two biggest wishlist features by kbmccarty · · Score: 5, Informative

    I switched from Pine to Thunderbird a few weeks ago; here are the most important things I miss:

    • The ability to mark certain lines not to be automatically wrapped when composing a text email. This is important when reporting error messages from compiler output, etc.
    • The ability to include a text file inline in the email message (NOT as an attachment) while composing it. Useful when including config files, quotes from more than one email at once, etc.

    Another feature which would be nice to have (but not nearly as important to me) is support for mbox folders in subdirectories of the top-level mail folder.

    Anyone know whether it's possible to do any of the above in Thunderbird? If not, what's the best way to make the feature request?

    --
    - Kevin B. McCarty
  55. D-Spam by DreadSpoon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out the D-Spam project. Very effective; claims to be 10x more accurate than a human. (If the parent-parent post is any indication of human skill at spam filtering, than 10x is a gross understatement. ~,^ )

  56. Pinstripe? OSX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, most programs written for OSX don't have to have a 'theme' in order to make them look... just like a standard OSX program. What's wrong with doing that?

  57. OS X version by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    I've been using it on my PowerBook for months since my mail client of choice (Mailsmith) doesn't do IMAP and having the PB do IMAP is the easiest way to avoid synch problems.

    That being said, up to and including a nightly from Friday, it still can't handle a mailto: link passed to it from another application.
    Silly--and sloppy.

  58. Gmail by bluenote39 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hate to break this to all mail client developers, but after using GMail, I doubt I'd ever be going back to anything else.

    The main problem with have desktop mail clients is about spam. I access mail from 5 diff computers, so it takes 5 times as much effort to train the clients junk mail controls (since they dont share data). With gmail's central reporting, not only do optimize my spam settings, but I also benefit from other people's reporting.

    All gmail needs is some sort of inbox monitor and I'd be all set.

    1. Re:Gmail by Hollins · · Score: 1

      Gmail seems ideal to me; however, I need to keep my email address that is associated with my domain name. If they add the ability to handle an mx record for an outside domain, I'd be willing to pay a nominal fee to use the service. It's unlikely to happen, but with Google, all things seem possible.

    2. Re:Gmail by UnknownQ · · Score: 1

      I set up my email address at my domain name to both forward to gmail and save a copy for my home computer to grab: best of all worlds.

      --
      Wherever you go, there you are!
  59. Re:My day just keeps getting better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give him a break, he posts on Slashdot. He's probably never so much as talked to a girl before.

    A bit like me, really.

  60. Overhead by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Our Courier IMAP Server which uses FAM for Enhanced IDLE Support means IDLE connections are using virtually NILL resources.
    Indded. It's a pity this feature has not been widely implemented. My web presence provider forces users to keep their mailboxes small because of polling overhead. I switched to them because I wanted IMAP, but not being able to have a big mailbox kind of eliminates the advantages of IMAP.

    It's interesting that the Mozilla people don't seem to see this issue. They just think of it in terms of notification:

    IMAP users can now benefit from support for the IMAP IDLE command which allows the mail server to push notifications such as new mail arriving as soon as it arrives.
    Having your email delayed by a brief polling interval is surely less important than eliminating polling overhead on the server. That the Mozilla folks don't grasp this suggests an unpleasant disconnect from real world problems.
    1. Re:Overhead by cras · · Score: 1
      Having your email delayed by a brief polling interval is surely less important than eliminating polling overhead on the server.
      Nothing prevents the server from internally using the exact same technique for handling polling commands as when client is issuing IDLE command. The overhead for polling is then just a few more bytes of network traffic per polling period (over a minute usually).

      Hmm. I wonder if that's really a good idea to implement, my server currently just requires two stat() calls per NOOP command if nothing has changed so it's not exactly slow either.

    2. Re:Overhead by jaylee7877 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wouldn't say that Mozilla has lost grasp on real world problems. They're simply attacking the issues from a user's perspective rather than from a sysadmin or organizational perspective. Firefox allows users to have a safe secure and powerful browser, an admin could accomplish about the same feats by locking down IE network wide, blocking ad sites and spyware downloads, etc. Thunderbird is the same way, SPAM can be blocked at the client level. Mozilla simply gives the user's and the admins the choice to make it a client issue or a network/sysadmin issue.

    3. Re:Overhead by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      IMAP users can now benefit from support for the IMAP IDLE command which allows the mail server to push notifications such as new mail arriving as soon as it arrives.

      Having your email delayed by a brief polling interval is surely less important than eliminating polling overhead on the server. That the Mozilla folks don't grasp this suggests an unpleasant disconnect from real world problems.


      Umm..correct me if I'm wrong, but if the server is pushing notifications, can't it use interrupts rather than polling? Why would the server need to poll the file for changes when it can just trigger an event when the file actually changes?? Or just use the 'mail arrival' event??

    4. Re:Overhead by douthat · · Score: 1

      Dreamhost doesn't force users to keep mailboxes small. I have a 930MB mailbox on dreamhost ATM with no trouble, which I access via IMAP. You may be confusing the email auto-expiration for some sort of quota. Login to http://mailboxes.yourdomain.com and make sure you have quotas and auto-expiration turned off.

      --
      She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
    5. Re:Overhead by HoserHead · · Score: 1
      Further to the already-posted responses:

      The whole point of IDLE is that it's meant to be implemented in a non-polling way. On Linux, Courier-IMAP uses FAM; when a file changes, the IMAP daemon is informed. There is no polling.

    6. Re:Overhead by fm6 · · Score: 1
      You may be confusing the email auto-expiration for some sort of quota.
      For most of us, it comes to the same thing. You must get an unholy amount of email to have 900MBs that isn't old enough to be automatically moved out of your mailbox.
  61. exporting mail from thunderbird... by feidaykin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wish they'd add an option to export mail into some other formats (like a .csv file or something). Also I read that it uses the "mbox" format that is supposedly understood by other clients, and I should be able to import thunderbird mail by choosing "Import from Eudora" however, that does not work with Outlook Express.

    I'd really like to have my mail in both clients... anyone out there manage to export from thunderbird to Outlook Express?

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:exporting mail from thunderbird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:exporting mail from thunderbird... by nolife · · Score: 1

      I use Thunderbird and have used OE express but I can not give you a direct answer to your question. But... I can suggest switching your email storage from client based over to server based like IMAP. It is a big jump but well worth it in the long run.

      Some advantages..

      - One location for all of your mail
      - Used with Procmail and Fetchmail, provides one stop collection and filtering of all of your mail (no need for multiple rules on multiple mail clients)
      - Access to your email from ANY IMAP mail client, this is a major plus, Pine, Thunderbird, Opera, Kmail, OE, Bat, Eudora, Squirrelmail, command line, and many many more.
      - Easier access to you mail from a remote location y tunneling into your IMAP server.
      - Others that I can not think of right now!

      Disadvantages

      - You have to a server running with IMAP on it. IMAP does not require much power and can easily be installed on a second hand hardware. Many people already maintain headless or "server" so adding IMAP should not be a problem.
      -

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    3. Re:exporting mail from thunderbird... by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      Well, I believe that Outlook supports importing from mbox format...

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    4. Re:exporting mail from thunderbird... by thejaded1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is very possible to export from mbox to a format that LookOut Express reads (*.eml)

      Ask google for "mbox2eml" and "mbox to eml", both should yield helpful results.

      As for an export feature from Thunderbird, I am also waiting for such a feature. :-)

      -paul

      --
      :wq
    5. Re:exporting mail from thunderbird... by AReilly · · Score: 1
      The easiest way to export your mail (and import it into another mail client), by far, is via an IMAP server. Just set up an IMAP server, and an account on it, copy your mail tree across to that account...

      ...and then never bother to copy it back to the new client. Just use your mail on the server.



      Just say no to local mail stores.

      --
      -- Andrew
  62. Is this a news site, or a PSA board? by Vertigo+Donkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So what is the big deal?

    Oooh, Mozilla released another minor revision to Thuderbird. Big deal. No new features, just improovements on the same theme.

    I'm sorry, but items like Vermont Yankee's missing fuel rodes or NASA using Hollywood stuntmen to catch falling space probes or even news about the world's earliest known BBQ seem a lot more like 'news for nerds' than a minor revision to an already well-known (in the OSS community) application.

    1. Re:Is this a news site, or a PSA board? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      184 comments (excluding yours) says to me that quite a few people are interested in seeing this here.

  63. You know a few things annoy me about this release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The developer on May 1st specifically asked for testing on RC2 to flesh out final bugs and myself and others listed several in the Mozillazine Forum. He then proceeded to just ignore them and release Thunderbird 6 with them. When I say ignore them I mean he literally didn't even respond and acknowledge them. I've been involved with OSS for like 6 years now so I know how busy devs can get and I know you don't treat them like they are working for you. But these are pretty sizeable bugs and he specifically started a thread for feedback. Next time I'm just not going to bother with bug testing.

  64. Replaced MS Outlook with Thunderbird 0.6 by Draculax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now I can have an email client with a cool spam filter which I can rely on and not having to resort to Spambayes (which is pretty good except it suck quite alot of CPU) because the spam filter built in Outlook is crap...

    Thanks to Mozilla for releasing Thunderbird 0.6, bye bye Outlook!

  65. Preview Pane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I turn off the preview pane yet? (yeah I know I can shrink it out of the screen.. I want it completely off though)

    1. Re:Preview Pane by SimplexO · · Score: 1

      Can I turn off the preview pane yet?

      http://texturizer.net/thunderbird/extensions/#to gm espane

  66. About still states v0.5? by evertjan · · Score: 1

    Did I fsck things up, or does Help -> About still indicate "version 0.5"?

    1. Re:About still states v0.5? by evertjan · · Score: 1

      Ok... to reply to my own question: YES, I did fsck something up: It seems pretty important to remove the old build before unpacking the new one. Like the singer sang: "I should have known better..."

  67. The timing is not right. by davetrainer · · Score: 1
    it would really make sense to tightly integrate Mozilla Calendar into Thunderbird.

    As somone else already pointed out, Calendar is available as an extension, and I'm inclined to think that's where it ought to stay. Were Calendar not a far, far less mature app than Thunderbird, you might persuade me that they should be bundled, but the timing is not right.

    The Moz folks readily admit "we currently lack active developers" on Calendar.

    You can't print tasks, can't export to HTML, can't do a proper advanced search, can't integrate with more popular clients, and can't sync with mobile devices.

    Lack of decentralized, open calendar functionality is a sore spot for me. I use Thunderbird at home, Lotus Notes at work, an iPAQ on the go, and I interact with lots of folks using Outlook, so I certainly sympathize with the point you are making. But I'm afraid it's quite wishful thinking at this point.

  68. anyone know if it works in win95? by ranarene · · Score: 2, Interesting

    did someone try this release in win95? the system requirements say >= win98

  69. Re:My day just keeps getting better by Finuvir · · Score: 1

    Okay that's it. Slashdot needs a date-advice section. Or how about "Ask Slashdot... Out"?

    --
    Why is anything anything?
  70. Mozilla Question by DroppedAtBirth · · Score: 1

    Does Firefox 0.8 + Thunderbird 0.6 = Mozilla 1.6 or are Firefox and ThunderBird completely seperate beast.

    --
    Rob
    1. Re:Mozilla Question by ScoutAtUMBC · · Score: 1

      No they equal Mozilla 1.4 :-P joking aside...the answer is no

  71. Still no address book import for OSX? by dalesmatrix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just downloaded the OSX version and still don't see any way to import or use the native OSX address book. It may seem like a small point, but when your trying to roll out a new mail client, being able to keep you old address book is a very handy thing indeed. Cheers

  72. Has This Been Suggested to Thunderbird Folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should see this... it's important.

  73. How does this compare to Forte's Agent on Windows by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    anyone familiar with FreeAgent/Agent from Forteinc?

    Is this a good replacement?

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  74. Submit your suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    A lot of people are posting interesting suggestions and comments and some people are posting the reasons why they don't yet use Thunderbird.

    To those of you who actually want to see your suggestions implemented, I suggest you file a bug or at the very least, submit it for discussion at the Mozillazine Forums.

  75. And the great thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And the greatest thing Mozilla has over Outlook:

    You get a new version every two months!

  76. As a new MacOS X user, I have one question. by otomo_1001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When will they get rid of this theming junk and integrate things with MacOS X the way it does things?

    Keep in mind, I only use Firefox when I am in windows or Linux/FreeBSD. But after using Firefox on MacOSX (even with the theme), it just seems wrong. It doesn't follow the interface guidelines. Camino is about the best gecko browser, but Safari isn't as braindead as IE, so less of a need for a decent browser. As far as Thunderbird goes, I just couldn't use it until it actually uses cocoa widgets. It is painfully obvious that the theme doesn't work like MacOS X.

    Well there goes my karma. /proceeds to prepare for negative moderation.

    1. Re:As a new MacOS X user, I have one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should start modding down those who refer to moderation in their posts.

    2. Re:As a new MacOS X user, I have one question. by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a cross platform product, it seems to me that it would be difficult or impossible to follow the Apple UI guidelines. There would have to be some sort of Mac-only build, which is simply not going to happen without a code fork.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    3. Re:As a new MacOS X user, I have one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. Mod parent up. ;-)

    4. Re:As a new MacOS X user, I have one question. by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

      Because the world does not revolve around Mac OSX users.

      --
      #include "sig.h"
    5. Re:As a new MacOS X user, I have one question. by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When will they get rid of this theming junk and integrate things with MacOS X the way it does things?

      Hell, I'd be happy with the OS X-ish theme if only I could use the systemwide address book and keychain. I use Camino for web browsing, because it supports the system keychain for site passwords and such. FireFox doesn't. The last time I tried Thunderbird, I had to use its built-in Address Book, which was a major reason I did not switch over to it.

      So yeah, as long as the UI is passable and reasonably consistent with Aqua, I care far more about the lower level compatibility. I'm beyond putting the effort into different address books for different programs - it's one of the reasons I switched to the Mac in the first place.

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
  77. Re:Compacting Mail Folders with Mozilla Mail Clien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not from the index file, but it removes the actual message from the IMAP server. In IMAP world, deleted messages still exist and take up space until they are "expunged" which is what compacting does.

  78. Cygwin == not native by Scott+Richter · · Score: 1
    You may have to jump through hoops, but a build for Cygwin is still a build for Windows.

    Horseshit. At that point, a build for linux is a build for windows, because I could have used VMware.

    For everyone else, putting cygwin is way too cumbersome and slow to be considered native. And yes, I have successfully got cygwin installed.

  79. Comparison To Competitors? by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How does Thunderbird compare with Evolution, KMail, mutt, pine, Sylpheed, and Outlook?

    [I use Mozilla Firefox for browsing but Evolution (on KDE) for email.]

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Comparison To Competitors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here you go.

      program receives mail sends mail
      ------- ------------- ----------
      Thunderbird yes yes
      Evolution yes yes
      KMail yes yes
      mutt yes yes
      Sylpheed yes yes
      Outlook yes yes

      Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted.

  80. Mailbox Standards by leperkuhn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of importing and exporting all the time, it would be nice if the mail client simply integrated, using the existing mail folders. There's always features of one client that you want in another, but it's a pain to use two different clients. The operating system (windows and macosx anyway, I don't know about linux) already has the address book / mail folder api's available, why not just use them?

    --
    http://www.rustyrazorblade.com
  81. OT - amusing google image search by splateagle · · Score: 1

    mmm manly

    ...excellent quotage though!

  82. I use Thunderbird/Firefox on OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to use Safari and Mail.app but since the upgrade cycle is killing me (just moved to 10.2) I can't upgrade neither one of them without doing the whole OS over. Also I stopped using Mail.app a while back since I had a crash and it lost data (in an IMAP folder!) which is (to me personally) unforgivable!

  83. Thunderbird is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched my home computers over to Thunderbird from Outlook and would never go back. Best email program I've used. Now if it would support Exchange so I could use it at work...

  84. Cookies by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Until Safari allows me to allow or deny cookies from individual servers like the Mozilla family can, it will never satisfy my inner Cookie Nazi. I'll stick with Firefox until then (despite its many flaws).

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Cookies by bwy · · Score: 1

      One other issue I fogot with Safari- not a biggie since there are other tools for this, but I wish it would display XML markup the way IE or Mozilla does.

      OS X in general doesn't seem to be as XML aware as I'd like. The default .xml association is with a property editor app, I think.

    2. Re:Cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X is very XML aware, but no tin the way you like. All native preferences are now XML files which is why it auto associates with the property editor app

  85. Logo by stud9920 · · Score: 0

    I understand the mental association between a pigeon and mail, but in which way is a pigeon a thunder bird ?

  86. Shouldn't that be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thunderbox. You know, to go along with the new naming scheme.

  87. How do people archive old mail using Thunderbird? by seaneddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd love to switch to Thunderbird, from rickety old emacs RMAIL, but one thing keeps stopping me. I get a lot of business email and I need to keep it archived and organized well. My archive is organized by sender and year: about 350 files for different senders each year, averaging maybe 10-100 emails in each file, dating back now over 11 years (about 3000+ files). Keeping this in emacs RMAIL is trivial, because they're all just regular files in my home directory that I can rename or move to new subdirs at will, and I can save emails out of RMAIL just by typing "o" and giving the name of the file. And since Emacs is lightweight enough (!) to run over my DSL connection, I never really need to run an email client anywhere but from my main work machine where my archive is, even when I'm travelling, so I haven't needed IMAP capability.

    When I look at Thunderbird and other modern clients, I just don't see a way to keep track of old email as efficiently. I can create "local folders", I guess, but it doesn't appear that Thunderbird is going to treat these as regular files that I can shuffle off into a 2004/ subdirectory at the end of the year. And worse, since Thunderbird is heavyweight enough that I'm not going to run it down a DSL connection, it's going to create them locally, not remotely on my work machine, when I'm reading mail from home or on the laptop while travelling. IMAP seems to be a partial answer but it's going to keep its data on the mail host, not in my home directory, if I understand right.

    Surely people have the same problem - how do you solve it?

  88. KMAIL + IMAP = KRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kmail has horrible IMAP support. Right after you load it, it will get your emails just fine, but after 10 minutes, it will always get stuck while updating your folders.

    Just forward copies of your email to gmail, and read your mail by IMAPing to your regular server. Email backup is easy.

  89. Visual notification is here! by univgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    While it doesn't show the number of new messages, it does keep popping up in the dock, and the icon gets a green tick mark, if there is a new email. I love it!!

    --
    All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    1. Re:Visual notification is here! by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      Ah, I didn't know that. Is that new? Thanks. I would prefer it if Thunderbird did show the number of messages, but something is still better than nothing.

      --
      Little Bricklets
  90. The great part about Mozilla.org projects.... by MortisUmbra · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is the nightly builds. It is SO easy to get nightly builds working. You almost never lose any of your settings, just delete the contents of the program directory, download the .zip containing the newest nightly build, plop it in the old folder, and viola, nice spanking new version. :) for that reason this .6 release isn't really a big deal to me!

    Whens the last time IE or Outlook had an update?

    --

    "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
  91. Re:How do people archive old mail using Thunderbir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I use IMAP. It's true that the mail resides on the mail host, but the "mail host" for IMAP can be your computer, which is what you're doing de facto anyway.

    Takes a bit to set up but you won't be looking back. And you can also set up webmail with squirrelmail for internet cafe/kiosk access when you're away. It's very convenient, really.

  92. New throbber? by nandhp · · Score: 1

    There's a new throbber for TB! I liked the old one better. Can someone do a theme for TB that looks the same but has the FireFox-type throbber? But I do like the new logo.

  93. PDA Sync by stm42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The main reason I don't use mail clients like this is because they will not sync with my palm. I need to be able to make a calendar change in one application and have it on my handheld or vice versa. Does anyone know of plans to include this feature?

    1. Re:PDA Sync by sjpwong · · Score: 1

      Exactly why I can't migrate my family over too. There was an extension to do this (http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbir d/extensions/palmsync/0.4/) but as you can see it was last updated in Oct 2003. It was mentioned in the v0.5 release notes but has completely dropped off the extensions list now :-(

      If these apps want to take off they need PDA (esp. Palm) sync capability.

  94. Getting to Version 1.0 by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    So what is it going to take to get to version 1.0? I'm uneasy about software that even the developer labels with what is considered beta release versioning.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Getting to Version 1.0 by syrinx · · Score: 0, Troll

      Geez, if this were a Microsoft product, they'd already be calling it 2.0. Version numbers are completely arbitrary.

      I've been using Thunderbird since v0.4 I think, and have had few problems with it.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  95. I am. by repetty · · Score: 1

    >> How many folks on a Mac are really interested in using anything other than Safari and Mail?

    My father and I both use Mozilla. My ex- and her family use the "new" Netscape.

    Safari and Mail are great, but they still lack. Mozilla's email component runs rings around Apple's Mail.

    Admittedly, we are running Mozilla on fast 867MHz G4's.

    --Richard

  96. Who cares? by e03179 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Who cares? Gmail will soon be here!

    --
    -516
  97. KMail by number6 · · Score: 1

    > 2. It would do PGP/MIME instead of signing inline (yuck!).

    It does. It's just non-obvious to get it to work.
    http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.ht ml

    I think there is a plan to get this to work out of the box in the not too distant future, though I don't know how close this is to being a reality.

    --
    I'm a number, not a free man!
  98. Magic H8 ball. by Jestrzcap · · Score: 1

    Actually, I asked the magic 8 ball on my desk if this was the case. What it said was
    "Outlook not so good"
    A clear sign that Thunderbird has passed Outlook.

    --
    "I have great faith in fools: Self confidence my friends call it." ~Edgar Allan Poe
  99. Re:How does this compare to Forte's Agent on Windo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    With Yenc support missing from the 050 version, my opinion is a loud and clear...No Way will I switch to Thunderbird as prime email and news client. Now if one does not use Usenet for binary collection then it might be. My prime email and news client at this time is Agent 2. I am waiting to try TB 060 to see if it is time for possibly switching. Another feature I want is full control over blasted HTML crappy email just about everyone seems to be sending. I have that control in Agent yet I can not find it in TB yet. Perhaps TB 060 will change that.

    It boils down to personal tastes. For me, I think Agent shall remain my prime email and news reader client for the foreseeable future with TB as backup and playtoy. You may think the 100% reverse which is certainly your right.

  100. Re:How do people archive old mail using Thunderbir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I can create "local folders", I guess, but it doesn't appear that Thunderbird is going to treat these as regular files that I can shuffle off into a 2004/ subdirectory at the end of the year.

    Of course you can. Now you can't do it with shell commands but you can create an arbitrary hierarchy with local folders that mimic what ever structure you want. I'm using Mozilla but I imagine you can just Right click over the root node in the tree you want to expand, choose new folder. You can then do a search over you local folders (i.e. "all messages from year 2004"), select all, and move to the 2004 folder. What else do you want?

    You can still scan them as "regular files" with Emacs if you want. Just can't modify them outside the application. Most of my 'ancient' email forays are informational, not to "do" anything with them.

    As far as remote access. Run VNC through SSH. The only thing on the wire is the screen bit changes. Not quite as lightwieght as text mode Emacs, but over DSL should work good enough.

    keeping all the mail on the mail host works in IMAP (again you can have whatever hierarchy you want of folders in most setups). The problem is quota. Most likely you "home dir" quota is significantly higher than your "IMAP" quota. My mail archive over several years is gigabytes. No one is going to give you gigabytes on an IMAP server.... Google inlcuded. :-) (gigabytes because folks love sending Word and Powerpoint in email instead of shared file mechanisms.).

  101. Re:How do people archive old mail using Thunderbir by phallstrom · · Score: 1

    I could be wrong, but I think the mail files that thunderbird creates are just plain text files one message after the next separated by "From ...". It's the same format pine uses... can't think of the name.

    I am pretty sure I copied my pine mail files into my local thunderbird directory and it picked them up just fine.

    So I would think you could create a sub folder and move whatever files you want into it.

    also for imap, except for perhaps your inbox, the rest of your mail is stored in your home directory... usually anyway...

  102. Yay, new smileys by RovingSlug · · Score: 1

    Yay, they've also updated the graphical smileys from totally awful to reasonably attractive. Much better.

  103. What i wanna know ... by jc42 · · Score: 1

    ... good as Thunderbird is at blocking spam and viruses, if it starts deleting people's email ...

    Is there yet a way to get Thunderbird to steal things like email, newsgroup settings, and address-book data from mozilla? I've experimented with the Tool...Import stuff, but its behavior is totally baffling, and it doesn't seem to have ever nabbed any data from any competitor.

    This is on both linux on OSX, where I have stuff in MacMail and MozMail that I'd really like to merge into the bird's files.

    There's also the mess caused by the 7 browsers (at last count) on my OSX box. For testing web pages, of course; for real browsing I do mostly use firefox now. It would be really nice if I could somehow find a way for them to share at least the bookmarks. But I suppose that's a wild dream.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:What i wanna know ... by kashani · · Score: 1

      IIRC Thunderbird for Windows can import from just about anything and all other platforms had issues doing this. At least that was the case in .5

      kashani

      --
      - Why is the ninja... so deadly?
    2. Re:What i wanna know ... by jesser · · Score: 1

      I switched from Mozilla Mail to Thunderbird 0.5+ using these instructions.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    3. Re:What i wanna know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the Thuderbird FAQ. It has advice for importing mail and settings from Mozilla.

  104. Re: mozilla mail format by sloanster · · Score: 1

    it doesn't appear that Thunderbird is going to treat these as regular files that I can shuffle off into a 2004/ subdirectory at the end of the year.

    Actually that's the nice part about the netscape/mozilla/thunderbird mail format, it's just plain old files, which are amenable to all the normal text utilities. I can even read my old mozilla mail folders using elm -f (folder name).

    I do indeed archive my old mail by year as well.

  105. Torrent link anyone? by urbieta · · Score: 1

    I think wa are a menace to websites as a slashdotting identity heh

    Buts its not that fun since we all want to take a look, maybe we should start a slahdot-p2p website mirroring thinguie for our viewing pleasure

  106. Re:Evolution? by symbolic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually I'm a long time user of evolution

    I think evolution has potential, but it's got a ways to go - after I lost all my email from an update, I decided to dump it. I now use thunderbird. One of evolutions most annoying "features" was its inability to check mailboxes individually - it's always an all-or-nothing proposition. The stupid thing about it is that for those that you don't want to check, you have to cancel a series of password dialogs- every time, unless you set it to check certain boxes automatically- and that's not always a desired option.

  107. Kerberos support? by fitterhappier · · Score: 1

    Is there any progress on a kerberos authentication plugin? I'm managing several hundred lab machines, and our campus uses kerberos. Thunderbird would be the ideal cross-platform (Mac, Linux, Win) mail client, since users would have the same experience regardless of platform. Until there's kerberos support, I can't point to Thunderbird as a solution for my users.

  108. Citrix by vgaphil · · Score: 1

    Anyone tried running Thunderbird on Citrix? We are moving away from Netscape and not going anywhere near Outlook. =)

    --
    A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
  109. INBOX.spam.train.spam (was: Sluggishness) by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1
    and have all of them moved into INBOX.spam.train.spam
    OK, who named that? Monty Python?

    --Mark
    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    1. Re:INBOX.spam.train.spam (was: Sluggishness) by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      I admit to naming it. It makes more sense when you see it in the context of:

      INBOX.spam.possible
      INBOX.spam.probable
      INBOX.spam.train.ham
      INBOX.spam.train.spam

      where the first two folder are for mail that Spamassassin classifies as "maybe spam" versus "is certainly spam", and the second two are where you put email that's been misclassified and that you want to use to train the filter.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  110. But I want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Thunderbitch!

  111. Also, why no attachment manager? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1

    I've had a number of colleagues complain about how they want to delete large attachments from their inbox while not losing the text portion of their messages. An example scenario: when a group is revising a large document and sending revisions to each other several times a day.

    Does anyone know why more mailers don't have the ability to save/remove attachments without destroying text? It seems to me you'd just search for the starting/ending MIME flags, pipe the message through a filter that doesn't echo the MIME text, and recreate a replacement message with the headers and text unchanged.

    Anyone reading this know about mail manager programming?

  112. Re:So they've not renamed it?.....ThunderBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Thunderbox?

    Now THAT is a way to flush away spam...

  113. OT:FF elements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclaimer: I am not an expert at anything, let alone Japanese mythology. As I recall, the original Final Fantasy had the classic four elements: Earth, Fire, Water, and Wind. Each element in that game had a corresponding Fiend, which is a theme that appears in several games in the series. Over time, however, the games evolved several new elements. Thunder more or less replaced Wind at some point as one of the primaries, but Wind elemental spells still show up in the series. Ice (or Blizzard) similarly replaced Water. Final Fantasy 7 had a dozen or so elements, I think.

    My guess is that it's about balance in the magic in those games. If you could manipulate those forces, then it makes sense that you could use a little fire to hurt something, or a little electricity, or a lump of ice. It doesn't make sense that you could hurt something with just air unless it was a lot of high-velocity air, like a tornado. But sending a tornado after an imp doesn't seem to be on the same level as setting one's fur on fire, so you don't get to summon tornados or torrential floods until you get to the level where you can conjure flames big enough to destroy whole armies or ice meteors capable of forming new lakes.

    In other words, it's pretty much a Squaresoft thing instead of a Japanese thing.

  114. Re:How does this compare to Forte's Agent on Windo by HoaryCripple · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a replacement for Forte Agent, you should check out Pan (pimp ass newsreader). This is the best newsreader if you want text groups or if you want to leech binaries.

  115. Re:My day just keeps getting better by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1
    Pinch me, please!


    No can do. We can hammer your karma to shit though :)
  116. Using Thunderbird on a network by Baron+Eekman · · Score: 1

    As the sysadmin of a rowing club, I am trying to find a good mail client for some time now. We have a small network of 4 workstations and a server. They are all running Windows, which is most familiar to nealy all users. In particular I want to be able to put all mail and settings of each user on a mapped network drive, pointing to their home directory on the server.

    Currently we use Eudora, which is very easy in this matter as you can specify the user directory in the command line:

    "eudora.exe z:\mail"

    I would love to switch to Thunderbird, as Eudora has some other drawbacks. However, I have not been able to find if this can be done in Thunderbird yet. Does anyone know?

  117. Then you didn't look very hard, did you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the heck hard is it for you to go to Account Settings->Server Settings->Advanced?

    What, are you adding and removing 10 accounts per day that you can't be bothered to make 1 lousy extra click?

    And besides, a majority of users still are on dialup, and still use only their ISP's SMTP.

    If you are going to be a picky asshole about it, then fucking code it yourself.

    What the hell do you think of that?

    1. Re:Then you didn't look very hard, did you? by Seven001 · · Score: 1

      Right, and I bet the majority of those dialup users use their dialup ISPs built-in email client, or webmail. I also bet that the majority are technically challenged and would not be downloading a different email client when Outlook Express is sitting in plain view.

      Furthermore, your cowardliness, don't you think the coders want to hear about features that people want / don't want? However insignificant? I should think they do, or they wouldn't be coding it at all. A minor annoyance is STILL an annoyance. The only way they can change things is if people speak up about it.

      Now go troll elsewhere, prick.

  118. Switching to Thunderbird for dual boot and fun by Lairdsville · · Score: 1
    I switched from Outlook to Thunderbird in an attempt to get a more secure email system and found I was very happy with it. Even my wife, who 'just wants to read her mail', managed to change without any significant problems.

    I dual boot Win2K and Mandrake, so to make things consistant, I changed my Mandrake email from KMail to Thunderbird as well. The fantastic thing that I discovered after doing this change was that I can use the same data files for both boots! My mail is now consistant however I boot.

    So now that my wife and I are using OpenOffice.org, Firefox and Thunderbird, all with common data, it is getting to the point where the OS is disappearing.

    As soon as I can get all the plugins to work in Firefox, I can get rid of Windows altogether. Freedom!

  119. Almost there. by CuppaJoe · · Score: 1

    Very nice. However, it still can't display yEnc encoded attachments, so for now I'll have to stick with Pan, horrible as it is in other respects.

    1. Re:Almost there. by CuppaJoe · · Score: 1

      OK, I take that back. It's not yEnc that's the problem, it's something else. It has problems displaying many attachements in-line, even those that can be opened successfully using an external viewer. Hmmm.

  120. Re:How do people archive old mail using Thunderbir by AReilly · · Score: 1
    Just run your own IMAP server. Courier IMAP uses the Maildir store in your home directory, just as DJB intended. So all the messages are files in directories, and you can muck about with them however you like, back them up, find them with a search engine, whatever.



    I've heard that the IMAP protocol is nasty and has never been implemented twice compatably, but the functionality is just about perfect for mail.



    I use qmail and courier to concentrate about four or five different mail feeds and a few lists, and I can access my mail with mutt or evolution or thunderbird, or [insert most mailers here] from anywhere on the network.

    --
    -- Andrew
  121. UW-IMAP and IDLE? by ceswiedler · · Score: 1

    The UW-IMAP server supports the IDLE command according to their documentation. Has anyone gotten it to work with Thunderbird 0.6? I don't know if there's something I have to configure, but when I send an email I don't get a notification in Thunderbird until the standard check-mail time expires.

  122. Better Porn usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm using TB as my primary client to receive inbox porn. I want to be able to save all image or movie files from the inbox after I download them from the pop3 server to a folder on my harddisk. So far, I cannot do this with TB.

    Will v.6 allow me to save images from multiple message to a folder or will I have to click on each message one at a time?

    Obvious AC

  123. Re:How do people archive old mail using Thunderbir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You keep around 11-year-old email? Whoa, you must work a Microsoft.

  124. Installer Warning by ej0c · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird .6 says it comes with a spiffy new installer, which indeed installed the program nicely and brought all up in working order.

    Alas, it didn't come with a warning not to uninstall previous versions. When I add/remove'd 0.4, all my scores of addresses and hundreds of messages appear to be completely lost.

    (WINXP - Yeah, I searched application data folders)

  125. Sorry for the bad mod if you weren't flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh. sorry if i moderated an honest post as flamebait. (i moderated your post as flamebait.) just fyi, the reason i moderated it that way was that your claims were so obviously wrong that i believed you were intending to solicit flames. Here's why:

    1. Thunderbird has nothing to do with java. not a scrap of java code anywhere there. No SWT. No AWT. No Swing.

    2. Thunderbird is not slow. In fact, it is substantially faster than Outlook Express on my machine. (650MHz PIII.)

    In addition to those two technical problems with your post, it further looks like "flamebait" because people enjoy flaming those who say positive things about Outlook Express.

    Sorry if it turns out that you really weren't posting flamebait, but there's why it looks like it to me.

    Regards,

    your friendly moderator.

    1. Re:Sorry for the bad mod if you weren't flamebait by stateofmind · · Score: 0

      It's ok, live and learn. :) In the future I'll be sure to better word my responses.

      Josh