Slashdot Mirror


BYU Project to Silence Computer Fans

phunster writes "The New York Times has an article about Scott D. Sommerfeldt and his students at BYU who have created a noise suppression system for computer fans (drop of human blood required to read article). The technology is not new, he uses out of phase sound to substantially cancel out the sound of the fan. What is interesting is his implementation of the technique. While other systems place a microphone and speakers in the center of a room, he places four miniature speakers and microphones around the noise source itself. His results are promising."

369 comments

  1. Now THIS is just great... by ControlFreal · · Score: 5, Funny

    BYU Project to Silence Computer Fans

    We as /. computer fans have been discriminated for so long, that you'd think that we, as computer enthousiasts, have had quite enough....

    • First we are bullied as small kids...
    • Then we are bullied as high-school kids...
    • Then we couldn't (or can't) get a girlfriend...
    • Then we are shunned at parties (provided we are invited at all)...
    • Then we are looked at funny for griping about DRM issues...

    An NOW, these people that have been bullying us all along have invented a system that makes us keep our mouths shut... Just great...

    Pills... must... take... pills...

    --
    Support a Europe-related section on Slashdot!
    1. Re:Now THIS is just great... by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      I'm in Logan, Utah, home to one of the 'non BYU' Universities in the state. They have a reputation of being....non-tolerant. :)

      Anyway, given that reputation, and that I'm at an in-state rival. I really expected this to be a "Your Rights Online" story.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    2. Re:Now THIS is just great... by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

      have invented a system that makes us keep our mouths shut...

      No, you can still open your mouth, but now people's eyes don't glaze over as you describe, in detail, the lapping of your processor before you attach your custom made 40 gpm watercooling system to it, and achieve a 13% higher overclock than with the factory hsf combo.

      It also makes all that inscecent yammering about HL2, Doom3, and DNF suddenly, magically, go away.

      Ah, the peace. The solitude.

      Hey, how come nobodies listening to my story about tweaking the Mandrake kernel for faster database resonse times? Don't act like you can't hear me. You know you can! Listen to me! I DESERVE TO BE HEARD! STOP LAUGHING AT ME. I DO NOT LOOK LIKE A GASPING FISH!!!! I WILL HACK ALL YOUR COMPUTERS AND ALL YOUR FAMILIES COMPUTERS. YOU WILL PAY!!!

      Oh, how you will pay...

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    3. Re:Now THIS is just great... by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      It's called The Register, with a higher Signal/Noise ratio

    4. Re:Now THIS is just great... by nocomment · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think I need some pills also, I thought the article said that a drop of human blood was what silenced the fans. Maybe I jsut need sleep, but I'd prefer pills ;-).

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    5. Re:Now THIS is just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, sorry for pantsing you and stealing your lunch money in the third grade. No hard feelings, right?

      -- Steve Ballmer

    6. Re:Now THIS is just great... by dotgod · · Score: 1

      You've been getting bullied by Mormons?

    7. Re:Now THIS is just great... by figa · · Score: 1

      Noise cancellation == death!

    8. Re:Now THIS is just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, computers are made for viewing porn and masturbating, which is very very evil. The Mormons are just doing their part to make sure we're all saved!

    9. Re:Now THIS is just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUNNY

    10. Re:Now THIS is just great... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Disassembled...dead.

      Disassembled...dead.

      Disassembled... DEAD!

      Nooooo disassemble number five!

    11. Re:Now THIS is just great... by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      This would be awsome, I went with a liquid cooled system as it was much quieter. It still generates some noise tho. Now the thing to do is build a really big noise suppressor into my car so that I can automatically suppress all those idiots with the super woofers in their cars thumping their way down the streets.

  2. We've seen this story before by KoriaDesevis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We've seen this before here.

    1. Re:We've seen this story before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this post before here.

    2. Re:We've seen this story before by Mz6 · · Score: 2
      Nope..

      This one was posted by CmdrTaco and the other was posted by timothy.

      Completely different.

      --
      Hmmm.
    3. Re:We've seen this story before by Mz6 · · Score: 2
      Nope... This one was posted by CmdrTaco and the other posted by timothy.

      Completely different. :)

      --
      Hmmm.
    4. Re:We've seen this story before by Mz6 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      *to rip from a previous post: Yes, but that post was from timothy. This one is from CmdrTaco. Completely different.

      --
      Hmmm.
    5. Re:We've seen this story before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we haven't, it was only published today. What we have seen before is a similar story. Apart from the publishing date, you can tell the difference between the two stories by comparing the words in the article. However, that would require you to have the RTFA and I appreciate that that's a challange too far for many readers of Slashdot. Perhaps though, you've written a simple perl program or whatever, to automate this process of comparison. If so, may I politely point out that you're a lousy coder and suggest that you get a job as a taxi driver where your poor observational skills and meaningless banter will be appreciated.

  3. Silent fans are a BAD thing by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the fans inside your CPU are silent you wouldn't notice if one failed, my machine is fairly quiet but i would notice if it booted without the CPU or PSU fan running.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any recent system can monitor the CPU and case fans RPMs (and temperatures) and shutdown/freak/panic/whatever if the fan stops spinning. There are a plethora of third party warning devices to this end as well.

      If my CPU fan stops spinning my computer throws a tantrum you can hear from space.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most...retarded...post...ever...

    3. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by HellKnite · · Score: 1, Redundant

      This is why most modern fans have RPM monitors, and most motherboards have built-in support to alarm and/or shutdown when RPM's fall below a certain level. Beyond that, most current CPU's also have temperature sensors, so that if a fan fails, and temperatures begin to rise, the system will either shutdown, or simply halt.

    4. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by RobPiano · · Score: 1

      That's just silly. Most computers have temperature monitors on the CPU. If it gets to hot there are PLENTY of programs that will warn you or turn your machine off. Acoustic monitoring may not even work! It could easily be whirling loudly and you wouldn't know that the CPU was 80 C.

      A temperature monitor is the way to go in all cases.

    5. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are an idiot.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    6. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by dougmc · · Score: 1
      If the fans inside your CPU are silent
      Don't worry -- they won't be silent. Only quieter.

      And besides, as others have suggested, there are better ways to monitor fans. And if you have several computers in your office and just one of the fans fails, how likely is it that you'll be able to hear the difference anyways? Especially if you're not listening for it?

    7. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be a...er...temper tantrum, would it?

    8. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny my computer alerts me to failed fans and in fact I can tell it to shut-down if any critical fans fail....

      Oh wait you are talking about the really low end junk...

      My Compaq ML530 has these features as well as the 4 year old Alienware sitting at home that STILL blows away new pc's that people buy today... (P-III dual play's UT204 better than the neighbor's 3ghz P-VI... BIG GRIN!)

    9. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by slothbait · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have trouble sleeping without the humm of my 6 cheap-noisy ass fans.

      I corrupted my dormmate as well. He said he had to turn on a fan to fall asleep over the winter break. \o/

      oh PC! Humm me to sleep at night and bask me in your warm CRT light by day!

    10. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MY GOD!! I can't hear my heart beating!!! *gasp* see you in the next life...

    11. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by mongus · · Score: 1

      I think the smoke would be a good indicator.

    12. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by ShinSugoi · · Score: 1
      It's true that most modern hardware has RPM sensors for fans, as well as copious amounts of temperature sensors, but typically the settings to monitor these are disabled by default which means that most users aren't aware the features even exist.

      Personally, I think my shop would see a lot more fried processors/hard drives/video cards if it wasn't easy to listen and determine if a fan was working or not... Even a non-technical person can do that.

    13. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by bharath · · Score: 1

      But you would then hear the noise from the out of phase sound wouldn't you? Unless ofcourse both the fan and the noise suppression system fail at the same time.

    14. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:1, Groan)

    15. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Rick.C · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I've clipped a baseball card to my CPU fan with a clothespin.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    16. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine plays a file called DangerWillRobinson.wav

    17. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      that may be true but I still like knowing if my computer is on when i am downstairs (no it's not loud, i just have good hearing. and no my eMachines T2200SE w/Radeon9700 pro rev.0 isn't cheap junk. (I also do not know if my system has a heat/Fan alarm because it has never overheated or had a fan fail on me.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    18. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the noise generator is controlled by local noise (it has to be in order to do it's job) so no you would not hear the out of phase sound

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    19. Re:Silent fans are a BAD thing by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      There are a plethora of third party warning devices to this end as well.

      For example, the smoke detectors.

  4. Forget silencing the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Can't we just silence BYU and the whole state of Utah? Please, someone? Can you take Orrin Hatch with you when you do this?

    1. Re:Forget silencing the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some nice WMD would be nice, please? I am in Utah now but moving back to Chicago cause I can't stand the whole "Follow the Prophet" mentality of all the freakn Mormons here, (DISCLAIMER: I am Mormon, just not one of the BYUite, in-tolerent SOB's).

    2. Re:Forget silencing the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Can't we just silence BYU [snip]? Please, someone? Can you take Orrin Hatch with you when you do this?

      COnsidering SCOX and their ties to BYU I thought almost the same.

      [previously snipped]> and the whole state of Utah?

      Sorry that you included a lot of "innocents" and the "political correctness police" seems to find it not funny, you need to be more specific: The McBride brothers, Blake Stowell, Chris Sonntag, Ralph Yarro,... (wth, I got tired of the detailed enumeration, on second thought it is easier to say "the whole state" and the heck with the innocents, Cone Of Silence!) :P

  5. NY Times Random Generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    (drop of human blood required to read article)

    Not when you use this

    1. Re:NY Times Random Generator by a+man+named+bob · · Score: 1

      or this

  6. Speak it, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why wasn't this posted in the Censorship section?

    Corporations try to silence some kid's website, Michael is falling over himself to denounce it. Corporations try to silence fans, and where is YRO? Not reporting on this, that's for certain. A clear double standard. Disgusting.

  7. Just wear NR headphones by ites · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apart from the discomfort of wearing headphones over long periods, the noise-reduction works well in office environments. Cuts out more than just noisy PCs: also airco, neighbours, and fire sirens.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Just wear NR headphones by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      My headphones get me in trouble - like when the boss calls, or the phone rings, or my officemate has to throw things at me to get my attention.

      Once we had a tornado warning and had to evacuate the top floors of the building - but I was blaring Jethro Tull into my Sony MDR-V600s.

    2. Re:Just wear NR headphones by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Cuts out more than just noisy PCs: also airco, neighbours, and fire sirens.
      You must have some magical noise-reduction headphones. The ones I have, from the low tech (plugs of foam you stick in your ear) to high tech (working like the system described in the article) do definately drop the volume of the noise around you, but neither makes it so you can't have a conversation with somebody, and certainly neither drowns out the fire alarm. (Those things are INCREDIBLY loud.)
    3. Re:Just wear NR headphones by sulli · · Score: 1
      That works great! Particularly when those damn fire alarms and blinking strobe lights go off, I can concentrate on reading slash

      ..

      NO CARRIER

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    4. Re:Just wear NR headphones by bestguruever · · Score: 1

      That last one is particullarly useful. Those klaxons are terribly annoying.

      --
      if you think this is bad, you should have seen my last sig
    5. Re:Just wear NR headphones by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Remember that he was playing music. I have some Sennheiser noise cancelling headphones, and when they are on but there is a pause in the music, I can hear people talking 3 or 4 aisles away in a 747. But when the music is playing, it can be hard to hear just 'bout anything.

      Especially if you are from the "it don't sound good until the blood pours."

    6. Re:Just wear NR headphones by caseih · · Score: 1

      I've tried two different brands of these things and they don't work worth anything. Maybe the expensive Bose one works, but the ones I tried just added a low-pass filter to the signal. No noise reduction at all. It just fools you into thinking that (one type of noise masks another). Besides all this, both pairs I tried were terribly unconfortable. Not to mention the sound quality was lousy. I only used my last pair for 30 minutes on an overseas flight before giving up on the whole idea.

      Get earplugs from a local gun store. They work the best.

      Maybe someday when I can get real noise-reduction headphones if they are under 200 dollars.

      Better yet, maybe it would be better to cancel airplane noise int he cabin itself through some kind of in-plane noise reduction system.

  8. nice by Zungert · · Score: 4, Funny

    This would be well worth it on 90mm tornados. Its pretty shitty having 4 of them right beside your bed trying to sleep while your linux e-penis uptime grows every night ;)

    1. Re:nice by normal_guy · · Score: 0

      I have a linux e-penis, and I've noticed that the stability during prolonged uptime is comparable to WinXP.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    2. Re:nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom, that you?

    3. Re:nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get some 120mm fans, they may not be "quieter" from a dB pov, but at least it's not a high pitched whine and they "sound" quieter.

  9. Silence computer fans! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "We love Apple!"
    "Go Go Gateway!!!"
    "Exidy Sorceror is pure magic!""
    "Dude, we got Dell!!!"
    (click)
    Blessed silence.....

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Silence computer fans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me puts his little finger close to his mouth and says...
      Riiiighhhhttt...

    2. Re:Silence computer fans! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      "Exidy Sorceror is pure magic!"

      Wow. I remember that. That was the first computer that my dad owned. He used it to write the first edition of his book. I remember playing the old Scott Adams adventures on it when I was like 8 years old (30 now)

  10. noise cancellation by Jotaigna · · Score: 0, Redundant

    well its no news that as closer you get the speaker to the noise you want to cancel you'll get better results. Its like you have a light bulb and if you want to supress the light, the closer you cover it, the better it will do.

    --
    "The quality of life is inversely proportional to the number of keys on your keyring."
    1. Re:noise cancellation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Obviously you never studied acoustics.

      Noise-cancellation as implemented by these systems relies on matching an equal in amplitude, but opposite in polarity, waveform, to the incoming acoustic wave. By combining a compression wherever there's a rarefaction and a rarefaction wherever there's a compression, you wind up with blissful silence. However, the nature of these systems dictates that the interference only happens at specific places; where the waveforms match exactly. If you could place your cancelling radiator at the same location in space as the unwanted radiator, with the exact same radiation characteristics, it would be great, but you can't. Instead, you get cancellations at certain locations and intensification of the noise at other locations.

      Basically, due to acoustics, getting closer to the noise won't do you as much good as getting closer to the receiver of the noise. This is why NR headphones work great, and aren't hard to do, but NR for open environments is hard to do and doesn't work very well. No matter what you do, unless you can colocate the cancelling radiator, you will always make some parts of the freespace environment worse.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    2. Re:noise cancellation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Your analogy is flawed. Suppressing a light bulb is passive noise cancellation. This is equivalent to draping the fan in a sound-deadening material.

      Active noise cancellation is different, and your statement is not usually true for active cancellation; ANC usually works better when you get the cancellation radiator closer to the receiver, as opposed to the noise.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    3. Re:noise cancellation by rupert2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but if you have a whole room full of lights, its easier just to shoot them all out with a bb gun.

    4. Re:noise cancellation by smchris · · Score: 1


      Well, yeah. That is what I was wondering.

      Sure, this works if you sample your engine noise and want a quiet passenger compartment. But does one really want to create standing waves around a cooling fan?

    5. Re:noise cancellation by leinhos · · Score: 1

      I recall one theory regarding ANC that looked at the canceling source as a type of acoustic impedance modifier. Pointing the canceling source directly at the sound source would cause a standing wave between the two, but would transform the acoustic impedance into the rest of the room such as to make the combined source inefficient in radiating (preventing the sound pressure wave from propagating past the impedance transition presented by the active source). The "active damper" model.

    6. Re:noise cancellation by hubie · · Score: 1
      Good explanation; you beat me to the point.

      This isn't my field of study, but why do you suppose these guys want to put the microphones so close to the fan? The feedback into your control system is going to come from those microphones, so wouldn't you want to put them out near where someone will be? It seems to me that otherwise you'll do a great job making the area close to the fan quiet, but it won't help you anywhere else.

    7. Re:noise cancellation by Derkec · · Score: 1

      Not knowing much about acoustics, but having followed this discussion, I would speculate that the goal of putting 4 microphones next to the sound source is to surround the sound sound relatively equally and approximate colocation. Imagine a hundred tiny microphones forming a circle around the sound source. Any boost to the original sound given off by a given microphone should be cancelled out by a differant one on the circle. Also, no microphone would be terribly powerful, so the boost wouldn't be that great. The approximation would be of a single sound source in the center of the microphones - I think.

    8. Re:noise cancellation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! Acoustics is much too complicated. Just use the stereo method of noise cancellation - if the noise bothers you, just turn up the stereo!

    9. Re:noise cancellation by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      Active lightbulb cancellation would be impossible from what I understand. With sound it works because the sound waves are compressions and expansions of air that make your eardrums wiggle. Output the exact opposite sound wave to counteract the first one, which means that the air is being expanded by one wave, but compressed by the other. The result is no *net* movement of the air, depending of course on your position in relation to the two sound waves.

      Light is just photons (which have wavelike properties) hitting your eye. To counteract that, you would have to fire some kind of anti-proton, which doesn't exist. The "anti-light" source would probably have to be in the same place the light source, so that the "anti-protons" come from the same direction.

    10. Re:noise cancellation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Mmm... yes, and no.

      Point sources radiate differently than spherical membrane surfaces, which is what a hypothetical sphere of radiators would approximate. Fans aren't even point sources, so your radiation pattern is even more different, plus there's the whole impracticality angle in terms of - it's a fan, if you surround it with a sphere of speakers, the air is no longer doing something useful.

      But the approximation for a sphere of cone radiators (speakers) isn't the same as the approximation for a single point source.

      Acoustics is confusing as hell, even if you've studied it, and it's been a couple years for me, so I might be off.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    11. Re:noise cancellation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      The problem I'd see there is that it relies on the radiation pattern of the source being exactly cancellable; I would think that if you have something that radiates in a typical lobed pattern, you'd need a cancelling source that could radiate in an inverse lobe, which is (AFAIK) nonexistent.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    12. Re:noise cancellation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I'm not certain, to tell the truth; I think that it is possible, but has to do with phase cancellations. However, it only makes sense with a coherent light source; if you have an incoherent light source (like a light bulb) you have basically the same problem as broadband noise suppression, which is very, very hard.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    13. Re:noise cancellation by leinhos · · Score: 1

      Because this is supposed to happen in the "near field", a canceler of this type would just have to take into consideration the sound pressure field at the radiator's aperture (for a horn radiator), this is much more difficult if the radiator is omni-directional. That said, it's still not clear to me which paradigm these ANC systems are supposed to operate under.

    14. Re:noise cancellation by Derkec · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I figured I was wrong but would draw out someone who knew more. I was hoped I was a little more right, but I guess that's how it goes.

    15. Re:noise cancellation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Right, but most unwanted radiators are nowhere near representable as a horn radiator; they are, if not purely omnidirectional, certainly far more omnidirectional than a horn.

      You don't happen to have any info on that approach, do you? IEEE paper or something? I'd like to read about it, if you can track down where it was printed.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    16. Re:noise cancellation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Acoustics is probably the branch of engineering I found most counter-intuitive, and I've hit almost all of them at one point or another (elec, mech, aero, chem, materials, even a bit of nuclear). It doesn't work the way you'd think it would, even once you know what's going on. Weird shit, but very interesting - just recommend some background in fluid mechanics/dynamics and differential equations if you're going to try to treat it mathematically.

      The best book I know of, if you want to read up, is Fundamentals of Acoustics by Kinsler. It's very much an engineering oriented text, though; if you want a more practical book, track down a guy named John Bracewell. Ask him for his theater sound design textbook; a lot of it is aimed at doing sound design for theatrical productions, but there's some good basics on acoustics and psychoacoustics.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  11. How about an effective one! by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think this industry has come remotely close to making a fan that works. It's sad when people need tubes running to the bathroom just to keep the GPU or CPU cool.

    If you create a fan that doesn't need water and guarantees performance of a water cooler, I think it'd be a hit. I have never the gotten blue screen of death from a noisy fan. Look on any forum, people are not complaining about noise. People are whining about overheating...

    1. Re:How about an effective one! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      On any what forum?

      I've never had watercooling or peltiers or installed my PC in a freezer, and my 3.06ghz maxes out at only 40C at full load. It's fan runs at about 2400 rpm (it adjusts with load) and does a fine job. The actual design and construction of the heatsink is probably more meaningful than how many CFMs of air you're blowing at it.

      Overclockers create their own problems for themselves. If you run your car in the red all the time, you shouldnt blame the stock radiator when you blow a gasket.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:How about an effective one! by DrAegoon · · Score: 1

      Not in the forums I'm looking at. For many people speed isn't as important as having a computer that is always on, always convenient, and doesn't drown out every other sound in a room. Take, for example, home theater PCs. A good HTPC would have tons of diskspace, quality TV in and out, and a processor that isn't going to die trying to keep up with the broadcast. If you want to keep all that cool (and therefore stable) you need serious cooling without having the roar of the fans drown out your sound system.

    3. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 things:

      #1. There is nobody on this planet that "needs" tubes running to the bathroom to keep their CPU cool. If you think that you need this, then you need to be slapped around for a few minutes to put some normal non-geek sense in you.

      #2. Truth does not rhyme with troll.

    4. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck overheating, my cpu is at 46'C, (114.8'F), and my cpu fan is pretty silent(self regulating rpm). What bothers me is the fucking PSU fan, it's a fucking tornado. I should probably buy a $100 silent PSU though... but still...

    5. Re:How about an effective one! by neurojab · · Score: 1

      >people are not complaining about noise

      Really? Then why is there a whole sub-culture of people working on quieting their PCs? You can now buy quiet PSUs, Quiet CPU coolers, and oversize case fans with variable speeds.

      When I upgraded from celerons to athlon XPs, I was amazed at the noise generated by the cooling equipment. Then I swapped out a few parts, and I can hear my MP3s again. My PC used to sound like a cheap vacumn cleaner, now it's barely audible, quieter than most laptops. It really improves your state of mind to not be assulted by so much noise.

    6. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look on any forum, people are not complaining about noise. People are whining about overheating...

      You mean on any overclocking forum. Most home users don't have an over-heating problem but may try to sleep, read a book, or watch TV in the same room with a running computer. Once the bearings start to go on one a fan you might as well have a jet engine next to your head.

    7. Re:How about an effective one! by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      It's sad when people need tubes running to the bathroom just to keep the GPU or CPU cool.

      Do we really want to know what's running through those tubes?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    8. Re:How about an effective one! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      It's passive social cooling.

    9. Re:How about an effective one! by Alereon · · Score: 1

      There are dozens of highly effective aircoolers available. The problem is that people only buy the cheapest, crappiest heatsinks available. Get a Thermalright (NOT ThermalTake) cooler and you won't have problems. You can even get performance that is vastly better than your average loud cooler when using a silent fan, if you use a good Thermalright heatsink.

    10. Re:How about an effective one! by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      It's sad when people need tubes running to the bathroom just to keep the GPU or CPU cool.

      Here at work I have tubes running to the bathroom but that's to keep me at my desk....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    11. Re:How about an effective one! by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

      I care. For instance, I personally would rather have a completely silent computer, than one that ran twice as fast. I hate how noisy most computers are any more.

      Maybe this isn't an issue for you, but that doesn't mean it isn't an issue. Have you ever been in a server room? Sometimes they are so loud you can't even hear yourself think. I live in a cramped appartment, and my computer is in my bedroom. Ideally I would like to leave it on 24/7 but it is too damn loud to sleep near, so I have to shut it down every night.

    12. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been complaining about noise for years.

      And here I am, running a system witn a single rear 120mm fan, the PSU fan, and an 80mm fan on my CPU. There is a little tiny fan on my video card that is failing and making a racket. I'm hoping to replace the card anyway with one that doesn't even have a fan. Right now if I unplug the video card fan the volume level drops by over 10dB at 1m. Small loud fans are the problem. Well that and hard drive spindle noise, but using an Antec Sonota case all that gets pretty much absorbed by the rubber used in the hard drive trays.

      Other things besides getting a Sonota and using the big Alpha heatsink with an 80mm fan and eliminating the video card fan all together, is to do exceptionally good cable management. Wind noise around wires makes noise. Get the wires out of the way, and you won't hear as much either.

      Of course don't overclock, that helps. (plus it will always be more stable at stock speeds period). After I corrected memory timing issues (I'd manually set them too fast) my machine has been capable of running 24/7 for weeks on end (Windows XP).

      Time for me to save for that new video card, i can still hear this thing....

      PS My other computer has a single 80mm power supply fan, and a single 80mm side intake fan. No video fan, no CPU fan, just a huge heatsink. P3 600, so its not a super cool chip to start with. That CPU always stays at reasonable temps even at full load (it does have that intake fan blowing directly on it).

    13. Re:How about an effective one! by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? There isn't a general purpose cpu or gpu in the world that requires watercooling for normal use. Sure, you can't use the heatsink off an old pentium 133 to cool your brand new pentium 4, but there are very capable heatsinks to cool the newest, most powerful processors. Notice how I haven't mentioned anything about fans. That because fans don't matter nearly as much as a good heatsink design. You just need something that moves air over the heatsink. Fans have been used for hundreds of years, and I don't think the physics of moving air changes when a heatsink is involved.

      If people are complaining about overheating then just about the only way the fan could be at fault is if the fan is not spinning. If you run a processor at stock speed with the oem heatsink and fan installed properly then there should be no overheating issues. And please tell me where these fans are that require water?

    14. Re:How about an effective one! by alwaystheretrading · · Score: 1
      Look on any forum, people are not complaining about noise. People are whining about overheating...

      I'm complaining about noise. In my office all of our workstations have dual processors and with all the fans whining it makes for a noisy office. One computer isn't so bad but when you have a half dozen in a small area it adds up quickly.

      Lately we've been adapting 120mm fans to fit on our CPU heatsyncs because they make less noise. It's really made a difference. On the other hand, we don't care how loud the fans in our server room are. We just want maximum cooling in there.

      Proud to work here

    15. Re:How about an effective one! by donkeyoverlord · · Score: 1
      If you create a fan that doesn't need water and guarantees performance of a water cooler, I think it'd be a hit.


      Not only would it be a hit but it would be a miracle assuming you have a perfect heatsink and fan the best you could cool your CPU to would be room temperature.
    16. Re:How about an effective one! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      Look on any forum, people are not complaining about noise. People are whining about overheating...

      Obviously, you're only frequenting forums that cater to overclockers. Most of us in the real world have absolutely no trouble with our computers overheating. On the other hand, spending eight hours next to a noisy machine (and then, for most of us, going home and spending another ten...) to enough to convince us that quieter fans would be a great thing.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    17. Re:How about an effective one! by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you browse too many overclocker/performance freak forums...

      Anyway, fans are only half the problem. You can run a thousand CFM through your coputer case and it could still overheat. Heat sinks are required to transfer the heat to the air effectively.

      You can't have a heat sink larger than the computer itself. Not if you expect to sell them to anyone but a performance freak or machine farm. There are also practical limitations to the design of heat sinks that limit their size and shape. Heat sinks are typically made of aluminum or copper. Depending on the quality of construction, the cost to produce them can be pretty high. Copper outperforms Aluminum but at a higher cost.

      If you want an active chilling system, then you have to worry about power consuption and humidity (condensation). Cost would be astronomical, and it would also be heavy and large compared to a heat sink and fan.

      You might get away with a system as an after market product, but I can't imagine it being a factory direct installation.
      =Smidge=

    18. Re:How about an effective one! by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? There isn't a general purpose cpu or gpu in the world that requires watercooling for normal use. Sure, you can't use the heatsink off an old pentium 133 to cool your brand new pentium 4, but there are very capable heatsinks to cool the newest, most powerful processors. Notice how I haven't mentioned anything about fans. That because fans don't matter nearly as much as a good heatsink design. You just need something that moves air over the heatsink. Fans have been used for hundreds of years, and I don't think the physics of moving air changes when a heatsink is involved. Fans are perfectly capable of cooling a processor at stock speeds. Anyone who runs watercooling with stock speeds is doing it because of the noise.

      If people are complaining about overheating then just about the only way the fan could be at fault is if the fan is not spinning. If you run a processor at stock speed with the oem heatsink and fan installed properly then there should be no overheating issues. And please tell me where these fans are that require water?

    19. Re:How about an effective one! by DevNull+Ogre · · Score: 1

      You aren't looking at the right forums.

    20. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but we already have tubes running to the bathroom so we never have to get out of our comfy computer chairs. Er, at least I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one, right?

    21. Re:How about an effective one! by DevNull+Ogre · · Score: 1

      You just aren't looking at the right forums.

    22. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while you're at it.. why don't you suggest we create lead that floats in air? I mean, if you can defy one law of physics, let's defy them all!

    23. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Don't be a dumbass. Fans work fine for desktop CPU's working at their normal specified operating speeds. Your complaint is like bitching about your car engine overheating after you've been driving 70mph for half an hour... in first gear.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    24. Re:How about an effective one! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Dude. It's a /fan/. There's only so much heat transfer you're going to get from a reasonable sized fan and a heat sink.

      Thermodynamics is actually a relatively simple set of principles. There aren't a whole lot of short cuts.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    25. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have never the gotten blue screen of death from a noisy fan.

      Neither have I, but I have gotten quite a few headaches from them.

      Oh, and the people whining about overheating are mostly whining about their 1.7Ghz Athlons being unable to reach 2.5Ghz without massive watercooling systems or several huge fans. I've never heard of a CPU overheating under the stock settings and the stock heatsink/fan. I've actually overclocked my XP 2500+ to 3200 with the stock heatsink (I've since replaced it due to noise reasons). The only people whining about the stock fans are overclockers and people who think they're too noisy.

    26. Re:How about an effective one! by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Well, look on any other forum and you'll see people whine about the noise, too...

    27. Re:How about an effective one! by shadowbearer · · Score: 1



      Any suggestions as to component brands? I'd love to hear some experiences, especially with passive sinks for the AMDs.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    28. Re:How about an effective one! by neurojab · · Score: 1

      >Any suggestions as to component brands? I'd love to hear some experiences, especially with passive sinks for the AMDs.

      I use:

      Enermax power supplies with tunable fans. It's very important to get a PSU with an air intake on the bottom.

      Seagate Barracuda Hard drives (liquid bearings).

      Arctic Silver III thermal paste.

      Rounded IDE cables for better airflow.

      Matrox G400 video card. No fans, works great with Linux.

      Zallman "flower" style coolers. They're not quite passive, in that they require a fan arm attached to the case. Some people say they're loud, but when tightened and tuned properly, they're very quiet. It helps to have a very solid case.

      Then I put the case fans on a varaible resistors (Zallman), and run them at about half speed. Two fans running at half speed are much quieter than one at full speed. If your case can accept a larger fan, that would be better yet.

    29. Re:How about an effective one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fan runs

      "Its".
      No apostrophe.

  12. Can the noise be more predictable? by RobPiano · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Blood Donation

    I don't know as much about noise cancellation as I would like, but I understand most of the concepts. Although the method described in the article certainly is very cool, I wonder if they couldn't get better results by redesigning the fan. It seems that the fan generates too much random noise. Is it possible to make a fan that has a more predictable noise source? It could even be a fan that is way noisier before noise cancellation...

    Another thought on this is that you really shouldn't consider the fan alone. The G5 has a beautiful interior with a ton of fans. Its not terribly loud, however, because the airflow is well designed.

    1. Re:Can the noise be more predictable? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Despite what the submitter said, the link works without registering. I had mod points but I figured I'd just mention it rather than mod.

    2. Re:Can the noise be more predictable? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure...but all the good thinkers on the subject get hired by the Navy for submarines. ;)

      I expect a lot of the same principles apply.

      One potential source of noise is rough edges. So get the finest sandpaper you can find and smooth the blades on the fan. The problem is that since it's plastic, it won't help much. You might get better results from using a material that's polishable.

    3. Re:Can the noise be more predictable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sound from sources like fans, motors, engines etc are all fairly random. The very fact that noise cancelation works at all is a pretty good indication that the noise is in fact gaussian. The noise comes from mechanical interfaces in the fan as well as air movement (friction, really). If you design a fan with predictable noise you may just design one without any real air movement. But something to consider is the possibility of capturing the sound of a given fan in a given box and instead of real-time killing the signal, just use a pre-recorded noise cancelation signal... i dunno..

    4. Re:Can the noise be more predictable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont mean to burst your bubble but the navy tries to hire them. i worked in a navy sonar lab. i assure you they arent there.

    5. Re:Can the noise be more predictable? by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Due to the chaotic nature of the sound coming out, I doubt you could make the fan reliable enough. For instance, you can't even hold the speed constant due to unavoidable and unpredictable variations in voltage; you can keep the speed changes below human detection but one of the primary uses of interferometry is increased sensitivity and that's not a mathematical artifact of no interest to humans, it's real.

      If the cancellation isn't almost entirely dead on, it will do one or both of "make the sound louder" and "make the sound annoying in new and spectacular ways", with exciting new rising and falling whines and phasing effects that would be the envey of many a techno DJ.

      Basically, you can't guess the frequencies coming out of the fan a priori accurately enough for cancellation purposes. Darn near any other purpose you could feasibly want to know the frequency distribution of the fan for, but not that one. It's a hard problem.

  13. Okay... by neiffer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I get how useful it would be to cancel noise in certain situations, but outside of a server (and even my Dell 400SC is sooo quiet I can barely hear it), what is the big deal for the vast majority of applications???

    1. Re:Okay... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Musicians would care
      So would home theater machines
      Listening to music on a PC would mean lower required volume
      How about being to sleep with a PC on 24/7?

    2. Re:Okay... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      I'm just bothered by the noise from my computer. There are ways I can ignore it, with headphones and such, but I don't always feel like wearing headphones. Idealy, the computer would just be silent.

    3. Re:Okay... by baudilus · · Score: 1

      So your wife can't hear you on the computer as she sleeps while you slashdot.

    4. Re:Okay... by dougmc · · Score: 1
      and even my Dell 400SC is sooo quiet I can barely hear it
      Then you're lucky. Many modern computers make a lot of noise -- sometimes even enough noise to make having conversations difficult. And they don't have to be servers. (Probably has something to do with the 60+ watt cpus people are using nowadays.)

      Or suppose your computer is in your bedroom, and you leave it on overnight. Wouldn't it be nice if it were quieter? Even the fan and hard drive in my DTV Tivo are annoying at night -- and it's much quieter than a full blown PC.

    5. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the big deal

      I wonder, too. I'd need a damn noisy CPU fan before I could hear it over my older hard drives. (Why would I throw away perfectly good 120GB drives?)

    6. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to be able to have the computer in the same room as you without getting a headache (My brother's computer is actually like that, it sounds like a 747 parked on his desk. I don't know how he can stand it. Maybe he's going deaf or something.). And no, turning the volume up doesn't help me at all; I don't want to have to have music on all the time, and even if I did, most of the music I listen to actually has some dynamics rather than just constant blaring drums/guitar/screaming so I'd still hear the PC's noise half the time anyway.

    7. Re:Okay... by kraut · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he's deaf? Wouldn't call that lucky..

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  14. Next project... by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if they could just silence the kids that come to my house to tell me about Joseph Smith.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
    1. Re:Next project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Step 1: Say "No thanks".
      Step 2: Oh wait, step 2 isn't needed.

      Retard.

    2. Re:Next project... by grahams · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pfft... I'll take a Mormon coming to my door over a Jehovah's Witness any day. Every Mormon that has come to visit me has been very pleasant and polite, and they have no problem taking "No" for an answer....

      Just politely tell them you aren't interested and they will politely leave. Mormon missionaries are not pushy.

      I've practically had to call the cops to get rid of JW's.

    3. Re:Next project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      just put up an electric fence. You can even setup a wireless webcam and have people pay to see those kids get shocked.

    4. Re:Next project... by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Funny

      But if you stop at step one you'll never get to...

      4. Profit!

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    5. Re:Next project... by shystershep · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt?

      Or maybe that's just me. It is my name too, after all.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    6. Re:Next project... by roadies · · Score: 1

      Anonymous reply. Definite coward.

      --
      DS vs.
    7. Re:Next project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bigot.

    8. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Funny.... Someone who belongs to a cult that was led by a prophet that said the following:

      You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, un- comely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind.

      calls another a bigot for criticism of his/her beliefs. This is a quote from Brigham Young. Who's the bigot now?

    9. Re:Next project... by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Brigham Young would be the bigot, none of us.

      Do I have any excuse for what Brigham Young said? Nope. But as far as it goes concerning the LDS church, it has no real baring on the church or its standings. It was a Journal entry from Brigham Young, never taught as doctrine of our church or any such thing. To not excuse him, but to cover us, I say that he was a man. Who made mistakes just as other men do.

    10. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You and I both know that this is the tip of the iceberg. You could list examples of the bigotry taught by the LDS church for hours. Why do the American Indians have dark skin? It's because they were evil and wicked.... That's not bigotry is it?

    11. Re:Next project... by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 0

      If you look at just about any Judeo-Christian sect, they're all bigots. Jews were Gods chosen people. Gentiles were scum. Don't marry with them, if you do, you're cut off.

      Look, I'm not here to pretend like objective views of my church aren't going to produce results that would seem somewhat off, but, just as any religion, a leap of faith is required.

      On a side note, yes, that is why a lay man's reasoning for why some indians have dark skin. (The skin was used so that the Nephites wouldn't intermarry with the Lamanites. So its not saying, "Because you've been bad, here's some dark skin!" And in addition to that, like many scriptures, the interpretation of those scriptures are up for grabs.)

      End result. You're right, parts of our theology may appear to be blatantly racist. Closer look reveals that the modern day LDS church is one of the most diverse churches. We're in all parts of Asia, most of Africa, Europe, South and North America and we cover the Pacific. We're far from a racist and bigotted church. Talk to members of the LDS church in Northern Arizona who live on reservations - ones of Native American descent. See if they think we're bigotted.

    12. Re:Next project... by Ether3k · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry. You seem to be confused. The skin was a 'sign', not a curse. But then again, I wouldn't have expected you to know that, since it's obvious you don't really know what you're talking about.

      --
      END
    13. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 1

      "Now we are generous with the negro. We are willing that the Negro have the highest kind of education. I would be willing to let every Negro drive a cadillac if they could afford it. I would be willing that they have all the advantages they can get out of life in the world. BUT LET THEM ENJOY THESE THINGS AMONG THEMSELVES, I think the Lord segregated the Negro and who is man to change that segregation? It reminds me of the scripture on marriage, 'what God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.' Only here we have the reverse of the thing-- WHAT GOD HATH SEPARATED, LET NOT MAN BRING TOGETHER AGAIN."

      This is a statement from Mark E Peterson. At the time he was an apostle. You'd think that something so ignorant would come from days like those of the civil war.. This was said in 1954 at your beloved University. So you see, BYU, Utah and the word Mormon will always conjure images of racism.

      Did you know that the majority of Americans have a negative opinion of Mormons in general. Despite all the PR. It's probably because of Satan. He's working so nobody can see the truth. This cult has so much mind control that you probably believe that.

    14. Re:Next project... by Ether3k · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that soon (If not already) there will be more Spanish-speaking members than English-speaking ones. And I'm FAIRLY certain that Latin Americans have darker skin...

      --
      END
    15. Re:Next project... by Ether3k · · Score: 1

      "I think the Lord segregated the Negro and who is man to change that segregation?"

      The word 'Think' designates this sentence as his own personal opinion.

      'Think' about that. I'm LDS and I certainly don't believe that. Apostle or not, he's still a man. In the early church, there were Apostles ex-communicated. Something else to think about...

      --
      END
    16. Re:Next project... by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, its funny though, because learned men of politics were debating this issue as well. And many had much stronger words to say regarding segregation. I will once again state this, the men who run this church are not perfect. Some have opinions, some which are flawed. (Bruce R. McConkie gave an entire speech on why blacks would neve receive the Preisthood... about 7 years later, they did. He followed that up with a talk on the flaws of men and their thinking.)

      As for your assertion that the majority of Americans have a negative opinions of Mormons, I take issue with that. (And no, I don't think its Satan's fault.) However, from my experiences with people outside the church, many have had very good views of me and my church. And no, I haven't lived in Utah my whole life. (Quite honestly, I detest Utah...) I grew up majoritaly in the Northern VA/Washington DC area... probably the most diverse collection of people outside of New York or Boston. Yeah, I'm definitely considered different and akward by a good majority of my friends, but they respect that and me just the same. Give me some hard numbers from an independent source, and I might give a second thought to that, but from my experience, people have been rather respectful of me and my religion.

      As to side note that, whether people accept something has never been a standard by which something should be judge.

      I'm truly sad you've only had negative occurences with my religion or people in it, or that you have formed this view on your own. I doubt there's much I can say to change your mind. All I know is its a gospel based on Christ and love and I hope you can recognize that.

    17. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to let every Negro drive a cadillac if they could afford it.

      #define RACISM
      #include
      #include

      lds = new relgion(RACISM);

      Where exactly did the LDS church retract all these dreadful racist statements. I don't recall every hearing an apology or even a retraction. Since these are statements coming from the top you'd at least expect some kind of retraction or recantation. Even Strom Thurmond apologized for his bigotry.

    18. Re:Next project... by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 1

      Uhm, many of them have. But you won't find many anti-mormon literature pieces quoting those.

      As for Strom Thurmond, the only reason he apologized is because he had to get elected.
      PS Liked the coding.

    19. Re:Next project... by binary+paladin · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Petition, also, ye goodly inhabitants of the slave states, your legislators to abolish slavery by the year 1850, or now, and save the abolitionist from reproach and ruin, infamy and shame.

      "Pray Congress to pay every man a reasonable price for his slaves out of the surplus revenue arising from the sale of public lands and from the deduction of pay from the members of Congress.

      "Break off the shackles from the poor black man, and hire him to labor like other human beings; for 'an hour of virtuous liberty on earth is worth a whole eternity of bondage.'" -- Joseph Smith, 1844

      Real racist there. I mean geez. If you're gonna condemn the Mormons you should condemn anyone that accepts the Old Testament as scripture. Gimme a break. For every racist remark I could list one contrary. What it shows is that a collection of weak men in a country that was, more as less, built up by a majority of racists.

      Please try not to remove the era from the statements. Brigham Young lived in a time where half of America didn't even view blacks or indians as human. They were considered subhuman savages. How is his view any different from that of Joshua or Moses who would go in and butcher those who weren't members of "The Tribe."

      The LDS prophets, even to those who believe that they are divinely inspired do not claim their perfection in any way.

      Of course the church was full of racism. It was formed by a huge collection of hicks in pre-civil war America. America was still segregated into the mid-twentieth century and racism still abounds.

      To point to the LDS Church as anything special in the world of racism is ridiculous. Was it riddled with racism? Yeah. Is it still? To some degree. Is it a lot different that dozens of other Christian organizations? Not really.

      "Why do the American Indians have dark skin? It's because they were evil and wicked.... That's not bigotry is it?"

      How often, in the Bible, are the sins of the fathers answered on the heads of the children and on to further generations? This concept is also not specific to being LDS. Furthermore there are plenty of Christian sects (and I don't count the modern, pop-culture Christians who have created a religion that is ignorant of its own history) that believe the blacks are the descendents of Cain. Again, nothing specific to being LDS.

      Oh yes, and as for the American Indians with dark skin, if you read the actual text of the Book of Mormon you would know that in the last days they are to be one of the most blessed peoples of earth and that in the days after Christ were among the most righteous on earth.

      The LDS church never was and still isn't anymore racist than the country it was born in. No matter what the doctrine of a belief, it's always affected by the cultures it operates in, for better or for worse. Give credit where credit is due.

      Brigham Young was a racist. It was wrong. However, I don't see you up in arms making the same statements about George Washington or... .

      Most of us here have grown up in a post civil rights movement world. Racism in the general public is *finally* viewed as a bad thing. How different would you or I be if we were born into a culture that told us people with dark skin were lesser beings? I don't mean just our immediate family, but the guy at the grocery store, our school teachers, the people we worked with, etc.

      Brighman Young lived in a country where it was the "in thing" to shoot Native Americans. You can say, "Oh! That's racist and wrong! How could anyone ever do such a thing!?"

      Take your own family tree back 150 years and I'm sure your family faired no better than most Americans (assuming your family was here back then). Again, the point here is to look at context. That much beloved First Amendment that we love to scream about here at Slashdot was written by a bunch of racists who lived in a completely different world than you and I. Cut'm some slack.

    20. Re:Next project... by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      His thoughts contradict Joseph Smith's.

      "You'd think that something so ignorant would come from days like those of the civil war."

      Oh yes. I forgot. In 1954 the United States was a racial accepting place where people like Martin Luther King Jr. lead quiet lives and had no work in front of them to equalize things.

      Again... being LDS is nothing special concerning racism. Mark E Peterson was living in a time where Southpark's "Operation Human Shield" comprised of blacks wasn't a joke, it was standard operating procedure.

      You cannot remove a statement from the era it was spoken in. Now if you can find a modern apostle saying something similar in a modern conference, please let me know.

    21. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 1

      As for your assertion that the majority of Americans have a negative opinions of Mormons, I take issue with that.

      For more information on this statement read Mormon America by Richard Ostling. You'll find the details on the study there. Don't worry. It's not "anti-mormon" so you won't go to hell for it.

    22. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 1

      Alma 3:6 "skins of the Lamanites were dark, according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was a curse upon them because of their transgression and their rebellion."


      Not a curse??? You're right just a sign...

    23. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 1

      You cannot remove a statement from the era it was spoken in. Now if you can find a modern apostle saying something similar in a modern conference, please let me know.

      The claim is that these guys are God's representatives on the Earth. They speak for Christ and are special witnesses of him. They have the gift of prophesy and are accepted as seers. I'd have to say that this statement was pretty damn short sighted. Which will lead you to my conclusion that these guys are no different than anyone else.

      You're starting to thing for yourself now....

    24. Re:Next project... by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 1

      Umm.... They died. What more do you want? Find a living Mormon leader who has made such statements. Mormons like all people are products of their time. Harry Truman made horrible racist statements but went on to change his views and create a very progressive civil rights program. Overall Mormons have an impressive outreach program and a very diversified culture. Most do not speak english (check lds.org). Their humanitarian efforts in Africa I believe show that, if they had provincial attitudes before, they have outgrown them. I do not believe any Mormon leader ever claimed to be perfect. If you take history in perspective and look at Mormons overall rather than a few cherrypicked phrases you will find that they have done some serious good for people of all races.

    25. Re:Next project... by portforward · · Score: 1

      I apologize for perhaps a couple of overzealous young men. I knocked doors* down in Buenos Aires for two years, and it was one of the hardest yet most fulfilling things I have ever done. We were always taught to be assertive yet polite. After all, it is important to make friends, because no one wants to listen to a foreign pushy know-it-all.

      * Actually in Argentina you typically stand outside the fence and clap your hands instead of knock doors or ring doorbells.

    26. Re:Next project... by notwrong · · Score: 1
      Again, the point here is to look at context. That much beloved First Amendment that we love to scream about here at Slashdot was written by a bunch of racists who lived in a completely different world than you and I. Cut'm some slack.

      I'm not American and haven't formally studied US history, so I could be wrong about this, but I thought some of the founding fathers actually were concerned with the rights of people other than free white adult males - Thomas Paine for one comes to mind immediately.

      Your post makes some valid points, but there would seem to be an obvious objection - if we know (now) not to follow the racist/sexist/*ist teachings because they were wrong and simply a "product of the times" how is it possible to trust the other teachings? Couldn't they be viewed as a product of their times too? This of course is not confined to Mormonism, I would say it also goes for many other faiths whose leaders or older teachings might have some skeletons in their historical closets.

    27. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 1

      Also important to note that our nations founders were politicians. You're using politicians as a yardstick to God's voice on the Earth.

      This is like saying, "Yeah I know that the Apostles Peter, James and John made some racist statements but you should have heard what Pontus Pilate said." Don't compare "Men of God" to politicians. Try to hold your "Lord's annointed" to a higher standard.

    28. Re:Next project... by zoloto · · Score: 1

      I want to mod you up so bad but I haven't a point so I have to reply telling you that was one of the greatest 1. 2. 3. 4. Profit jokes that even FIT with the current religious thread!

      This was a great and true art of trolling and by golly it was BEAUTIFUL!

    29. Re:Next project... by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Bryan, I'm sorry but I think you took that joke a little out of context to be offended by it. I'm LDS as well but could see that joke a mile away. My favorie one that replied was here

      by carlos_benj (140796) on Thursday May 27, @12:22PM (#9269380)
      But if you stop at step one you'll never get to...

      4. Profit!

      Lighten up a little 'brother'. All good humor has its quirks, but if you're offended for something like that one has to wonder what you AREN'T offended by.

      Just my 2 cents.

      -z

    30. Re:Next project... by zoloto · · Score: 1

      I hate replying to my own post but ah shiz, you know... I didn't click, to see who you were replying to. Next time I'll do that, heh! my bad? It looked like you were replying to this guy here

      Off topic now, but I kinda like Provo. Even if it is 90% saturated with LDS kids, the area I live in (800 N to 600 N right under campus) is 99.99999999% of our faith. It's a bit of a relaxer to be surrounded by people who for the most part share and actively keep standards not too unlike my own. Not that I relax my standards, but the fact that I am being scrutinized by non-LDS people for detailed stuff sometimes is stressfull.

      They associate "Mormom" with being a really good person and one "bad day" or mishap can give someone the view that we dont care or something along those lines.

      I mean personally, when I see a Hindu (indian religion that believes cows are sacred I think, correct me if I'm wrong) being publicly awesome about his religion, then find him at mcdonalds leaves me to be skeptical in a number of ways.

      anyways, enuf.

    31. Re:Next project... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I cannot argue with such refined discernment...

      Actually, I had teetered between that response and

      4. Prophet!

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    32. Re:Next project... by daperdan · · Score: 1

      Overall Mormons have an impressive outreach program and a very diversified culture. Most do not speak english (check lds.org). Their humanitarian efforts in Africa I believe show that, if they had provincial attitudes before, they have outgrown them.

      I call bullshit. I served a mission for the LDS church in a third world country. Very little of the tithes and offerings are given in humanitarian aid. The money is spent on it's members only.

      Overall the total amount of money spent on humanitarian aid is insignificant. Don't believe me? Take a look at the financials that are published by your church. Oh wait. They don't publish any of that information so nobody could possibly come to this conclusion:
      Their humanitarian efforts in Africa I believe show that,

      If you take history in perspective and look at Mormons overall rather than a few cherrypicked phrases you will find that they have done some serious good for people of all races.

      I know this church inside and out. There was no other major religion that prohibitted black participation as late as the 1970s. You spin is paralell to the spin that Gordon B Hinkley likes to put on this issue.

  15. Hah! by saderax · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i first read the headline and assumed it was a new tactic by the group 'BYU' to forcefully quiet the complaints of geeks and nerds everywhere!

    must be one of those days i guess.

    1. Re:Hah! by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I was wondering why this wasn't in "YRO". That's where we'd usually find the free (as in speech, not beer) flamefest and troll-con, right?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  16. It's not the noise made by the fans... by zepmaid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally its them damn harddisks that piss me off.
    If only someone could suppress the disk noise..

    1. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "If only someone could suppress the disk noise.."

      A ballpen hammer will do the trick. But I know what you mean, my systems tend to have at least a three drive RAID in em. My co worker keeps going on about how I should get a MINI-ITX based system because you can run them fanless. He just dosn't seem to get that I cant hear the fans over the hard disks.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seagate 7200 RPM drives are very quiet -- though the SATA drives are slightly noisier than the previous IDE models, from my experience.

    3. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by relyter · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the technology implemented to quiet the fans *could* be used to reduce disk noise, although I would be willing to bet that it would not be as effective, due to the fact the noise source is a much larger area. Instead why not use some of zalman's hard disk silencers that they implemented on their silent case

      Here's that story: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/20/075823 9&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=137

    4. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally its them damn harddisks that piss me off.
      If only someone could suppress the disk noise..


      Agreed. My Apple G4 Cube is fanless but alas the hard disk spinning racket is just as annoying as the fan in a regular G4.
    5. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      Get FDB (fluid dynamic bearing) drives. I have several of them in my ReplayTV units, which sit outside my TV cabinet, and I can't hear anything unless I put my ear to the case. This is a big deal because when I'm watching a movie on DVD, the last thing I want to be aware of is the whine of a drive that chewing on a bearing, in my living room. I don't know if they'll end up like my bearing drives, and finally start emitting horrible noises when they age, but if they do, it'll be time to replace, hopefully with something totally solid state...

    6. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second the motion.

      I got sick of the 4 semi crappy fans (with 4 bright red LEDs each, so pretty in a black case) I had running all night so I disconnected 3 of them, left one just to keep the airflow. my computer was still noisy because of the 3 HD's, 1x 40GB and 2x 80GB. (used for CD Backup images I swear)
      _>

    7. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by greenegg77 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need to check out today's BBSpot article, then.

      --
      --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    8. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone please tell me what's wrong with that article. There was a red flag when they said disassembling of the hard drive. Unless you're in a clean room with no dust, how are you going to do this successfully? and how come he put grease on the platters?

      I love the pic with the hammer though.

    9. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a fucking satire site you moron..... it wasnt funny, but even i got why they used the grease, come on now.

    10. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by tedhiltonhead · · Score: 1
    11. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by darby_smeed · · Score: 1

      You always want to leave at least two fans plugged in, not one. What happens when one dies?

    12. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's besides the 2 fans in the PSU so 3 fans total, 1 infront passing air passed the HD's, 2 in PSU. normally I have 2 in front, 1 in side and 1 in back.

    13. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1) Get a new harddrive. As drives get older, their bearings get louder. I have a new Seagate Barracuda and it's pretty easy on the ears. My IBM Deathstar 60GXP puts out a lot more high pitch noise and it quite annoying - though it is a couple years older.

      2) Use 5400 RPM drives for your data. These will be quieter, use less power, last longer, less heat, etc. You only need the zippy 7200+ RPM drive for your system and swap disk / virtual memory.

    14. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by aonifer · · Score: 1

      Seagate Barracudas and Samsung Spinpoints both use fluid bearings, and are very quiet. I've gone a step further and set my drive on some sorbothane pads to absorb seek vibrations. I can't hear my hard drive at all unless the room is very quiet and I'm listening for it.

    15. Re:It's not the noise made by the fans... by lucifer_666 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't be. Segate SATA HDD's are simply old stock with a new interface - ie. they took some existing PATA HDD's, unscrewed the interface, and plugged the new SATA one in.

  17. No-reg link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:No-reg link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually you can use &partner=ANYTHINGYOUWANT and nytimes will accept it.

    2. Re:No-reg link by sund · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice.

      Or you can try http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/49321

    3. Re:No-reg link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice! No doubt the developers weren't told what to do in the case of a bogus partner being specified. Any guesses as to how long it will be until that "feature" disappears and they review their server logs?

    4. Re:No-reg link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can just use Opera and disable referrer logging.

  18. Yes, much simpler than.. by schon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, this is much simpler than just making the fans quiet in the first place, right?

    Wonderful. "Look, instead of paying an extra 50 cents for a higher quality quiet fan, you can use cheap fans and spend $25.00 in additional parts to make the computer quiet!"

    *sigh*

    1. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      yeah, this method also strikes me as being power-consuming, and impractical for that reason... although, the idea itself is pretty cool.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    2. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by Zordak · · Score: 1
      Wonderful. "Look, instead of paying an extra 50 cents for a higher quality quiet fan, you can use cheap fans and spend $25.00 in additional parts to make the computer quiet!"
      If you're an engineer, of course you do. I thought that was a given. So what was your point?
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    3. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      cheap fan

      higher quality, "quiet" fan

      Hardly 50 cents. And, I doubt an IC, four mics and four small speakers would cost 25$ in parts.

      You can engineer a fan with perfectly balanced blades, great bearings, and eliminate much of the mechanical noise due to vibration or friction. But what of the noise generated by the moving air itself? You can hear this clearly when you have a case full of "silent" fans, and it's every bit as annoying.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ummm, I bought nice fans, and they still make noise when turned up. What's your point? Running a 92mm fan at 6000RPM is gauranteed to make noise. No matter how much you pay for it. Fans just aren't that quiet.

      --
      Photos.
    5. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Quietness should be a design goal/philosophy from the beginning, not an afterthought; much like security. I think it's dumb to start with power-hungry CPUs and noisy fans, and then bolt on a 'solution' for quietness.

      One of the many things I don't understand about current computer hardware is the segregation between quiet/small/laptop and big/noisy/desktop/server components. If you can design a low-noise and low-power component, why limit its use to laptops and other portable/embedded devices?

      I understand there are real drawbacks to laptop components, such as underperforming hard drives. But cost should not be an issue; these components are expensive only because of the limited demand. Surely it would be cheaper to use the same component everywhere, instead of producing two kinds of everything.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    6. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by ShavenYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or better yet, just design a machine that doesn't need fans at all. Honestly, the vast majority of home and office computer users could easily get by with a Via Eden chip, which can be passively cooled. Saves electricity too - the noisy fan is not the only problem with a CPU that draws 80 watts or whatever they're up to now.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    7. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by avalys · · Score: 1

      It may not be simpler, but it may be easier.

      Quiet fans are harder than you'd think to make. Even if the motor and bearings are absolutely silent, the air itself moving through the fan enclosure makes a noise.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    8. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by fortunatus · · Score: 1

      hear, hear! my office mate made a quiet fan by buying a very large (to get enough CFPM after slowing it down) 12V fan and running it on the
      5V supply.

    9. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... great heat dissipation or stunning silence.. pick only one... I think this solution is for people who need/want big noisy fans that can't be "designed" much quieter but work the heat well..

    10. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by kmac06 · · Score: 1

      Presumably this system will also cancel noise from hard drives, CD-ROM drives, video card fans, etc. Didn't RTFA, so I'm not sure.

    11. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      Wonderful. "Look, instead of paying an extra 50 cents for a higher quality quiet fan, you can use cheap fans and spend $25.00 in additional parts to make the computer quiet!"

      Well, if you have a very hot-running computer that really needs a noisy, high-RPM fan, it might be worth it. Yes, bigger (not faster) fans and cooler components would help more, but if you've just gotta have a dual Xeon workstation, and anything powerful enough to keep the thing running is bound to be noisy, then maybe a $25/fan premium to quiet 'em down isn't such a bad thing?

    12. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      92mm at 6000rpm?!? What the hell are you cooling, a 486 overclocked to 4Ghz?

    13. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      but if you've just gotta have a dual Xeon workstation, and anything powerful enough to keep the thing running is bound to be noisy, then maybe a $25/fan premium to quiet 'em down isn't such a bad thing?

      Sorry, I don't buy it.

      I have a dual Xeon workstation, and two other workstations designed for handling two chips, the second socket isn't populated, but the cooling system and power supplies are all set up for the second chip should I put it in. If you want specific models, one is a PIII Compaq SP700, the two other are Compaq P4 Xeon W8000 systems. One of the W8000's is serving as my HTPC to boot. I asked my sister if she could hear it, and she had to put her ear up against it.

      They are hardly what I'd consider loud. They are quieter than both of the small form factor Shuttle cases I've seen in operation, both of which were claimed to be quiet. The workstation can be quieter with simple passive damping techniques, there's no need for added complexity and cost.

      For any computer that is annoyingly loud, I'd consider calling it poor design and parts choices. I'm not against active cancellation, I simply think that there are cheap passive methods designing quiet, yet powerful systems. And you wouldn't have to deal with as many potential problems to boot.

    14. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I do agree.

      I also wonder if this research should be directed more toward aircraft engines, they ARE mostly just huge fans, after all. It's probably easier to research on a computer fan than a jet engine.

    15. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      is that a bad reading? Maybe motherboard monitor isn't giving me the proper specs. At any rate, with the fan at 100 it's loud.

      Oh, and i'm cooling a 2600 barton OCed to 3000 with an SLK947U. It throttles up to taht full speed on a hot summer day while encoding DVDs, otherwise it runs at 50%.

      --
      Photos.
    16. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by schon · · Score: 1

      Try a better designed computer.

      The Deskpro sitting in front of me is completely silent (the LED is the only way I know if it's on.)

      Seriously - I have very sensitive hearing (I can hear our cat walking on carpet), and silence is one of the main things I look for in a computer.

    17. Re:Yes, much simpler than.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or better yet, just design a machine that doesn't need fans at all.

      Agreed.

      This article makes me think Slashdot needs a new article category: "Inappropriate Technology"

  19. Four microphones and speakers per fan?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And how much electricity does this suck up, exactly?

    1. Re:Four microphones and speakers per fan?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      About as much as that vibrator you've got rammed up your ass.

  20. We need a context-free human language! by CharAznable · · Score: 3, Funny

    For a second, I thought that BYU was going to hire big, burly henchmen to "take care" of us Slashdotters...

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    1. Re:We need a context-free human language! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably Lamanites.

    2. Re:We need a context-free human language! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd like that, wouldn't you?
      Mmmmm... Me TOO!

    3. Re:We need a context-free human language! by scottennis · · Score: 1

      A context-free human language?
      Wouldn't that require context-free humans?
      Isn't that what the Patriot Act is all about?

    4. Re:We need a context-free human language! by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

      Naw, that's part of Microsoft's new Anti-Linux department.

  21. Simple answer by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

    Get a computer without a fan. I've had my Apple G4 Cube for a few years now, only now really showing its age and completely silent. Well, except for hard disk access. Of course you can't get them anymore, and Apple's new G5s have 4 or 5 fans in them... So don't think this is just some sort of fanboy rant, I honestly think that good design can get around the need for fans.

    --
    Yup...
    1. Re:Simple answer by bob65 · · Score: 1
      I've had my Apple G4 Cube for a few years now, only now really showing its age and completely silent.

      *sigh*... I wish no computer components required fans. I mean, do people really not care about noise? The market is driven by supply and demand, right?

  22. Anyone running 120mm Sunons... by Genin · · Score: 1

    ...would kill for this.

    --
    I am forced to conclude you are the master of the obvious. May others take heed of your wisdom.
  23. Not very hi-tech but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What benefit does this technology have over putting the case under the desk rather than on top of the desk?

  24. Will the same technology... by millahtime · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will the same technology also work on my girlfriend? She is like one of those movies that is just better on mute.

    1. Re:Will the same technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't expect us to believe that you actually have a girlfriend, do you? (besides inflatable dolls or your mom)

    2. Re:Will the same technology... by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      Will the same technology also work on my girlfriend?

      Probably. Send her 'round to the lab and we'll see what we can do.

      Oh, and TeeJay says, "Ask her to wear a nurse's uniform."
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  25. What did you say?? by Cboyd0319 · · Score: 1

    This is bad. The noise from the fans on my machines are the only things that drown out the voices in my head... '...Kill...Userssssss...'

  26. Use bugmenot.com to get a login for the NYT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Makes it easy. Unless you have the GOOGLE partner link.

  27. Blood? by paranoid.android · · Score: 2, Funny

    drop of human blood required to read article

    Does it have to be mine?

    "Hey Bob, come here, I've got something cool to show you. Oh, and bring a thumbtack..."

  28. It really works by rootnl · · Score: 1

    Yea, I've been using this technology for a long time; I just crank up my radio till I don't hear my computer. Unless Britney Spears comes up, then I prefer the soothing noise of my computer.

    --

    We are the people our parents warned us about.
  29. Use bugmenot.com to get login for NYT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes it easier, unless you have the GOOGLE partner link.

  30. Wife version.... by Himring · · Score: 1

    While other systems place a microphone and speakers in the center of a room, he places four miniature speakers and microphones around the noise source itself.

    Will the wife version require something worn around the next and will it have a remote control?...

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  31. Already proposed for cars by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    I remember an old episode of Beyond 2000 (http://www.techtv.com/beyond2000/ , but the old Australian version) where they showed an anti-noise system that would fit into a car's exhaust system. Microphones would pick up the noise from the exhaust manifold, a DSP would generate the appropriate "Anti-noise" then subwoofers would inject the Anti-noise sound into a specially designed muffler. The demonstration would drive a big V8 Holden muscle car around, clicking the noise reduction in and out. Without it sounded like, well, a muscle car. With noise cancellation it sounded like a Rolls Royce, that is, you didn't really hear the exhaust at all, just tires rolling on pavement and wind. Really cool, but probably too expensive to implement in most consumer vehicles :(

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  32. aMEN! by bechthros · · Score: 1

    The fan noise from a serious computer has long been the single bigegst noise problem in the modern digital recording studio. It used to be the most popular solution was putting your tower in a closet somewhere with long extension cords for the keyboard, mouse, and whatever else. I've seen this used in several studios.

    I think I speak for audio engineers everywhere when I say HALLELUJAH! This is a seriously practical and useful invention, hopefully it will be affordable!

  33. Costs involved? by HellKnite · · Score: 1

    "It's going to be a matter of what the consumer will be willing to pay for a quiet computer," he said.

    Are these guys not familliar with items like this? Somehow I don't see these fans costing that much.

  34. My fans are silent by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

    I just unplug all my computer's fans. Now my computer doesn't make any noise.

    At least my fiancee is happy about that.

  35. Active Noise Cancelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this is really cancelling the noise as opposed to masking it out so you don't notice it. It seems to me that no matter what type of active system you use you are pumping more energy into the system. That means more noise ( or heat :-).

    I remember years ago you used to have noisy offices that had white sound generators in them. The white noise masked the office noise and people thought it was quiet. The only problem was it wasn't. The average noise in the offices were higher and there was a higher incidence of hearing loss because of it. Of course you could claim that that was the "long term" noise abatement solution :-).

  36. Fans by king-manic · · Score: 1

    I just put 2 small extra fans into my p4 1.8 gzh machine (I went and got a nvidia fx chip and was worried about heat). It sounds like a friggin hair dryer. Although I've managed to tuen it out. I notice it when i turn it one and apaprenlty everyone in my 3 floor house notices the noise of this one computer.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  37. Is there a SPAM suppression: +1, Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    system for all the crap emanting from George W. Bush - "President" ?

    Thanks and have a FOX _News_free weekend.

    Regards,
    Kilgore Trout

  38. No!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a dupe on /.!!!!!

    Never happen!!!

    The editors are too on the ball for that!!!!

  39. Mac G5: Lots of big, slow-turning fans... by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An interesting project, but it certainly seems like a Rube Goldberg (Heath Robinson for UK readers) way to go about it.

    The Mac G5 approaches this problem by using lots of big, slow-turning fans. It's probably expensive, but I doubt that it's as expensive as active noise cancellation. And Apple did a very good job. The Mac G5 is not silent, but in normal operation it is quieter than any machine I've used since the fanless 1984 Mac and the Apple ][.

  40. doesn't solve the fan failure problem by nerdb0t · · Score: 1

    yay mormons. ;-)

    very cool - but the holy grail is to make a _fanless_ computer. fans are moving parts. moving parts are bad.

    if you just make the loud moving parts silent, then you are only removing the symptoms - but the real problem is still there: moving parts prone to failure.

    its a good idea until they get heat pipes to work with 100W processors.

  41. Silenced at BYU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I read silence and BYU I think of the forced silence BYU forces on its professors. It's good to see a positive article about academics at BYU. Here's to freedom of thought and freedom of speach; even at BYU.(if that's possible.)

  42. White noise degenerators... by argent · · Score: 1

    I found it amusing to have an add for noise *generators* come up along with the noise reduction article.

    [yes, I know it's not quite the same thing]

  43. The bad news is... by spineboy · · Score: 1

    the computational power needed is roughly equivalent to one computer.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  44. I have always wondered by nizo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why don't case manufacturers do away with the power supply and integrate a UPS into the case? Rather than have AC -> UPS (which converts to DC to charge batteries) -> AC -> Power supply (which converts to DC) why not cut out all the wasteful conversions? I could even see having room in the battery portion so you could upgrade to additional "plug in" batteries. Any thoughts?

    1. Re:I have always wondered by heydonms · · Score: 1

      Your average home user's UPS doesn't constantly convert AC->12vDC->AC it has a small step down circuit that carges the battery at 13.8v and passes through the mains power, then when power fails, it switches in the inverter. So I don't really see the benefit of combining it into the case.

    2. Re:I have always wondered by myov · · Score: 1

      Size, for one. My tiny 450VA ups is larger than a standard ATX power supply.

      My server ups which has a decent runtime (an APC SmartUPS 2200) is the size of a mini-tower and takes 2 people to move.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  45. Will the same technology... by millahtime · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Will this same technology work on my girlfriend. She can be like one of those movies that is better on mute.

  46. I, for one... by advance512 · · Score: 1

    welcome this new chance to write this annoyingly-repeated joke once again.

  47. A brief timeline by elwell642 · · Score: 1

    1995: My hard disk is just too darned loud!!

    2000: I can't stand the hum of the case fan!!

    2005: That LED is hurting my ears!

    --

    <insert witty linux comment here>

  48. Noise Cancelling Case Revisited by peel · · Score: 1

    I suggested this awhile ago for another article on silent computing. It got shot down quite handily, mainly because I can't speel verry whell. Anyway the people that did respond with things other than spelling mistakes had good insight into this. It seems this guy has come up with workarounds for problems they noted. -peel

  49. I know how to keep the noise down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn the thing off! Go outside, and get some fresh air!

  50. Text from article... by Stitch_626 · · Score: 2, Informative

    To Quiet a Whirring Computer, Fight Noise With Noise
    By ANNE EISENBERG

    Published: May 27, 2004

    THE constant drone of a computer cooling fan can be annoying. But a professor at Brigham Young University has taken an unusual step to mute this noise: more noise, produced in just the right quantities from tiny loudspeakers that surround the fan.

    "We make anti-noise," said Scott D. Sommerfeldt, a physicist who created a noise suppression system with his students. It is the latest example of a technology called active noise reduction, or noise cancellation, well known from its use in headphones designed to block out the low rumble of jet engines.

    The sound waves engineered by Dr. Sommerfeldt are out of phase with sound waves from the fan and thus they cancel each other out, substantially reducing fan noise.

    Dr. Sommerfeldt's system has four miniature speakers and four even tinier microphones set in a ring around the computer fan. The microphones and other sensors detect the noise of the fan blades and, with the help of digital signal processing and algorithms, radiate opposing tones from the speakers. The whole system can be tucked into the same space that a conventional computer cooling fan would occupy.

    Noise-cancellation technology has been in development for more than 50 years, Dr. Sommerfeldt said. In typical headphones, microphones in the headset detect noise; the speakers in the earcups counter with anti-noise.

    Dr. Sommerfeldt's target was not the roar of aircraft, but the hum of office machinery. To counter this noise, some active noise reduction systems place microphones and related gear in the middle of a room to calculate the amount of cancellation needed.

    But Dr. Sommerfeldt wanted to put the system within the computer casing itself so that it might one day become a built-in feature of personal computers.

    Trying to cancel noise from within the computer turned out to be tricky, though. "You are asking for trouble if you place the mikes right next to the fan," he said. While it may be possible to reduce the sound substantially at the microphone, he said, the noise level could increase farther away, where someone might be sitting.

    To solve the problem, Dr. Sommerfeldt built an aluminum enclosure that mimicked a typical computer chassis and put a standard cooling fan within. He and his students placed microphones and speakers around the fan, analyzing the nature of the sounds they would have to suppress and modeling systems to counter this sound.

    "The fan is not an easy source of noise to control," said Gerald C. Lauchle, a professor of acoustics at Pennsylvania State University and a colleague of Dr. Sommerfeldt. "Many interacting mechanisms create the noise."

    The specific sounds Dr. Sommerfeldt decided to counter were those made by the blades of the fan as they rotate and push air past obstructions like fan supports. The pushing is periodic, dictated by the number and speed of the blades.

    In the experiments, sensors mounted near the blades of the fan recorded the motion, and the information was fed to the digital signal processor along with the data from the microphones that were monitoring the overall noise. Then algorithms developed by the group adjusted the amount of canceling sound waves sent to the speakers so that the basic tone of the blades could be suppressed, as well as overtones or harmonics of the basic tone.

    "The basic tone is distinct," Dr. Sommerfeldt said. "It sounds like one you could hear if you hit a piano key."

    To find the pattern that worked best, the experimenters set up systems with one, two, three and four speakers. "We went with smaller loudspeakers and more of them," Dr. Sommerfeldt said. "The best configuration turned out to be four speakers spaced around the fan."

    The group measured the reduction in sound at the fan and at various points at a distance, said Brian B. Monson, a graduate student of Dr. Sommerfeldt.

    The experiments used two fan sizes, with b

    --
    Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind or forgotten.
  51. Does this cover HD noise? by ReyTFox · · Score: 1

    The grind and vibrations of your harddrive is also a significant factor in computer noise(though with a good drive it becomes secondary to fans). I've set my own computer at a slight angle(the back on a pillow) to reduce this noise, even though it increases my chances of HD failure.

  52. Me, by meshko · · Score: 2, Funny

    I use my good ol' AK-47 to silence them damn computer-lovin' freaks.

    --
    I passed the Turing test.
  53. NEVAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love my computer, and I will NOT be silenced.

  54. Physics says it's nearly impossible by TBone · · Score: 1
    If you create a fan that doesn't need water and guarantees performance of a water cooler, I think it'd be a hit.
    It would also be impossible. The only way this would happen would be to use immense volumes of supercooled air. Liquids are a much better conductor of thermal energy; even inefficient liquid cooling systems are more efficient then air-based ones.
    --

    This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

  55. Fan Zen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a cpu fan spins in a computer, and there is no one around, does it still make a sound?

  56. no. the noise isn't predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, this whole thing won't really succeed because the sound of fans is the sound of turbulent airflow. The sound of turbulent airflow is by definition very similar to white noise.

  57. Hobbies by bubba_ry · · Score: 1

    If they do manage to silence us, what then?

    At least I still have other hobbies like...er...um...dammit!

  58. It's a nice idea, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In some instances it's not just the noise from the fan but the vibrations fan induces in surrounding objects.

    For example I built a media-center OC using a Silverstone SST-LC03-B case, replaced the 60mm case fan with a Vantec "Stealth" fan, used a Zallman silent power supply and a Zallman copper/alimunum heatsink/fan, with the fan speed controller on it's quietest setting. In an office environment, sitting on the cases' shipping box while being tested and set up, the machine was virtually silent - I had to hold my ear next to it to hear anything.

    But as soon as I put it in my oak entertainment wall-unit, the wood resonated at the case fan's frequency and it was unbearable. The only solution was to disconnect the case fan entirely.

  59. Shut up already! by avalys · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    drop of human blood required to read article

    Christ, what is wrong with you people? Just spend the two minutes it takes to register and you're set for life. Use fake information if you're so egotistical that you think your real name and address actually matters to someone.

    What awful thing do you think will happen if you register for the NYT online?

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  60. Barring cost... why not just use the same... by kevlar · · Score: 1

    Barring cost, why not use the same technique as those filterless air purifiers. They produce directional air flow, which I have always assumed the velocity of the air was a function of the amount of electricity used in the system.

  61. The Silence of the Fans? by kansei · · Score: 1

    Lecter: Well, Clarice, have the fans stopped screaming?

  62. Four? by Syberghost · · Score: 1

    The makers of speakers and microphones were too busy high-fiving each other to comment.

  63. Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the REALLY sad part here is that the zealots are going to come out and shout/mod you down for being a "luddite" when all you are doing is lending some common sense (it's rather sparse in these parts if you've not noticed yet!)

    Cheers, and yes, your idea is hella better.

  64. This seems like the wrong way to solve this by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, quieting a single fan is only a small part of the battle. Unless that's the only moving part in your computer it seems like a bad idea to need a separate antinoise system for every noise source.

    Instead, I would elect to design the case not only for airflow but also for noise "flow". I'd spray panels with some kind of dense material - automotive undercoat might work fine, or barring that, spray-on bedliner. Or, I would use an adhesive panel such as dynamat. This has the significant advantage of being inexpensive. I would have one air inlet and one outlet, and only one of each, and I'd place my sensors and audio elements there. I'd also use baffles coated with a highly efficient sound-damping material which could be more expensive than the case coating.

    But, there is an even better way to do this, which is to use heat pipes to carry the system's heat to a large sink on the outside of the case. Or alternatively, use an external water cooling system. I was originally planning to do water cooling inside my PC (as there should be ample room in a 4U rack case) but I am now planning to make it external so I can put it behind some shit for noise purposes.

    With all this ranting said, when the technology gets cheaper and we can embed it into disposable fans, this very approach will be practical. Since it usually requires a DSP and some not necessarily inexpensive speaker units, that's a little ways off. I think it would be better to work on ways of not generating that noise than to cancel it, which is by its nature a wasteful process.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:This seems like the wrong way to solve this by mobets · · Score: 1

      Dynamat isn't all that effective... I tried it on one of my older computers with an ~6000 RPM 60cfm fan blowing though one of those swiftec heat sinks w/ all the little screws. It helped a bit, but not much.

      If you are wondering why the overkill heatsink and fan, it was too cool a 1.7 Ghz P4. The stock heatsink and fan were all but useless. Any way, it might have been loud, but it never got over 100 degrees.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
  65. lame picture by kguilber · · Score: 0

    This article has the lamest picture ever! Definitely some girl right out of art school that likes the color pink :)

  66. SCO to Silence Computer Fans by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    Also from that part of the country, SCOX has filed a lawsuit against all computer fans who use Linux, in an effort to silence them.

  67. How about the people on my bus? by HotButteredHampster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be happier if I could cancel the noise coming from the other people on my bus. There are days where I get off the bus ready to kill something.

    Eliminates inane chatter! Loud cellphone talkers banished! Never hear the high-frequency noise of other people's headphones! Buy now, only $29.95!

    I would sprain my wrist trying to get my wallet out to pay for it fast enough.

    HBH
    --
    "Smart is sexy." -- D. Scully ("War of the Coprophages")
  68. good mormon science by weopenlatest · · Score: 1

    Now they've just got to figure out a way to strap one of those noise-reducing speakers to the missionaries that BYU keeps churning out.

  69. They don't need big burly henchmen. by Behrooz · · Score: 2, Funny

    To take care of nosy nerds, they send ditzy chaste-yet-teasing BYU coeds. Guaranteed to frustrate and/or bore you to death within hours, unless you're a RM (returned Mormon missionary) in which case you'll end up married to them within two days.

    Either way, problem solved.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  70. Less Expensive Solution... by armyofone · · Score: 1

    I quieted the fan in my power supply by jamming a metal fork into it. As soon as the blades of the fan came into solid contact with the tines of the fork, the fan stopped spinning and my computer has been much quieter ever since.

    About the same time, I noticed that my computer began actng strngly though so maybe ths wsnt teh bsts srlstuion aftr ahl....?

    ** NO CARRIER

    --
    "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
  71. Hold onto your blood... by swaic · · Score: 1

    BYU Project to Silence Computer Fans

    For now at least. I'll collect later.

  72. Lucky by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
    I've been drooling over the 400SC since we started getting some in our office to set up for customers. It really is whisper quiet. Unfortunately, I bought the 500SC for home - which sounds like a 747 taking off. (Slight exaggeration.) I've only had the 500SC for a year and a half, so it's too early to retire it. If I could spend $25 to quiet the thing, I'd be happy.

    Caution on the 400SC with SATA: it won't boot from 3rd party IDE cards (such as you'd use for mirroring).

  73. Maybe its not the fan. Keep the Horse in front!! by lcsjk · · Score: 4, Informative
    Let's not get the cart in front of the horse here, and for those non-USA people, that means "Let's get things in the proper order".

    Maybe we should look at the fan design first. When Brushless-DC fans were first introduced in the early 1980's I evaluated most of the major brands. Blade shape and contour were major contributors to noise, but by far the worst was mounting the fan up against the panel wall with holes or a grill. Running slow also reduces noise. One company's blade design removed the high pitch wind noise and just left a low pitch rumble that sounded quieter than it was. Centrifugal "squirrel-cage" fans were much quieter than axial fans. Sleeve bearings were a little quieter than ball bearings, but had a much shorter life and will "freeze-up" once the oil dissipates. (I actually had this happen to my old computer.)Ball bearings get louder over time, but you'll replace your computer before then.

    Power supplies can reduce airflow requirements considerably by better heatsinks and/or using the chassis for moving the heat away from the hot components. Once the real design issues are tackled, the bell-and-whistles approach could then be used to further reduce sound levels as necessary.

    Dell mounts one fan deep inside the computer and the PS fan is quiet but near a wall. Six weeks ago I bought a Systemax and a Dell computer. Systemax sounded normally obnoxiously loud. Dell was so quiet, I thought it was not working, so I opened it to see if I could tell what was wrong. I was fooled by the sudden start of noise and then quiet.

  74. SilenX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or just buy a SilenX fan...

  75. ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok

  76. oh, those fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pictured a gang of angry Mormons blasting into various LUG meetings with automatic weapons.

  77. The solution is DIY by Cervantes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The solution is not more noise. I've heard rumours of evil things happening to your brain when the noise coming in one ear is slightly offset (time wise) from the noise in the other ear.

    Between the 6-8 desktops and 2 laptops floating around my desk at any time, my noise quotient was pretty damn bad, even when I took most of them down to the bare minimums of fan noise. Yes, I could have replaced all my fans with nice quiet ones, or modded the cases for noise reduction, but then I'd have to do that with every case, every time I changed up.

    The solution? I scored a cheap-ass enclosed LAN rack, got some cheap-ass wood cut for me at the store, and build my own LAN cases. The only fan in my entire 6'4" rack is a .7 Sonne, 130 CFM fan that is vented from all the cases (5 of them @ 19x19.5x7)

    My systems have never been cooler, the noise is so freakishly quiet that I'm still getting used to it, I've got more flexibility than I ever did, and with everything KVM'd, I've got a cleaner desk. Total cost? Maybe $200 CDN [insert "so that's $.05 US?" joke here]. And, on the bright side, with so much extra space in my cases, my mod list is getting bigger and bigger with all the nifty things I can do.

    Sure, noise cancellation works in the short term, but 8 hours a day or more? I'd be worried that some slight imbalance somewhere might screw with my brain or break my ears.

    Plus, my kick-ass blacklighted rack with piles of blinkenlichten is MUCH cooler than some wussy lil speakers.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    1. Re:The solution is DIY by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Maybe $200 CDN [insert "so that's $.05 US?" joke here]

      You beat me to it, so... NO

  78. Noise must increase somewhere, right? by mark99 · · Score: 1

    Conservation of energy?

    Or does the air just get hotter? (thereby making the fan rather pointless)

    Seems like some physical law is getting violated somewhere :)

  79. Recursion... by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

    Does the silencer require a cooling fan of its own?

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  80. My efforts to reduce PC noise by buddydawgofdavis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work in a computer music and acoustics research lab and we're always after a quieter PC. We've considered a solutions like this, but we've decided it wouldn't really be necessary for long. Here's why.

    Among the many reasons for having a hard drive in every computer, two of the big ones were the Microsoft vision statement, and the fact that the network was much slower than disk. The latter is no longer the case.

    The fact that network is now faster than local disk is a MAJOR development.

    We've experimented with RedHat 9 with nfs root on older hardware with no disk and no fans, with 100Mb bootable NICs. We found to our surprise that they ran faster than with standard (non UDMA) ide. So, we're trying it now with newer hardware and gigabit, and some BIG heatsinks. So far, so good. We can optimize the central storage for speed, and the systems do, in fact, run noticeably faster in most cases, in addition to being nearly* silent.

    We hadn't counted on the added bonuses, but there are many. We can change an entire system disk by moving dirs, reexporting, and booting the machine up. Poof, new system. We can install and uninstall packages on machines while they're off! We no longer have two or three extra gigs on each machine, all our nfsroots are from a single physical filesystem (so far) so they all have the same amount of free space, much more efficient! And if a machine offends you, you can yank the plug out. No local fsck!

    *Note that the machine is never truly silent. Without any fans or disks, you can still hear a certain noise that sounds like it's happening when the disk used to seek. It's the toroids in the power supply! The network traffic causes HF noise in the power lines, which is filtered in the power supply and causes the chokes to vibrate slightly. The noise is very low, it would easily be drowned out by the quietest of fans, but in a totally silent room with no other PC sound, it's quite audible. There is also some low and infrequent clicking while the machine is warming up and cooling down, due to the thermal expansion of the heat sinks. This doesn't happen during use, when the temperature is more or less constant.

    I'm supposed to document all this and I've been lazy, so if you want the rundown on booting redhat 9 without a hard drive, write to me and I'll finish the page and send you the link.

    1. Re:My efforts to reduce PC noise by zoloto · · Score: 1

      sure I'd love a copy. Email me at:
      s l a s h d o t u s e r -at- y a h o o -dot- c o m

      But have you thought of making the cables LONGER from your monitor/mouse/keyboard, and leaving the pc that booted off the network outside the room or in a sound proof box?

      I did that once for the studios here at KBYU radio and TV, they work great.

  81. Drop of Human Blood by koi88 · · Score: 1

    How can I send the blood? All I seem to get is a smudgy monitor.

    --

    I don't need a signature.
    1. Re:Drop of Human Blood by MacWiz · · Score: 1

      You'rte supposed to let it drip into the keyboard while holding Shift-Alt-Control.

  82. Silence your hard drive, too by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    As well as silencing your computer fans, you can also silence your hard drive. Guaranteed you won't hear the sound of a whining hard drive ever again, or in fact any noise from your hard drive at all. One step closer to an all-silent computer system.

    :-)

  83. Doesn't Darl "unix" McBride.. by Flashpot · · Score: 2, Funny

    already have IP rights to that idea?

    --
    That which does not kill her only prolongs my agony.
  84. To all of you who love computers... by revery · · Score: 1

    Unite!!!
    They may try to silence us, but they will fail.
    We will not go quietly into that dark night, we will go kicking and screaming...

    <sound of muffled voice whispering, patiently explaining>

    oh, well, carry on then...

  85. simpler alternative by hb253 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why bother with all this technology when you can reduce noise to a tremendous degree by using a nice quiet Nexus power supply, Nexus CPU fan, and quiet fluid bearing drive hard disk?

    --
    Self awareness - try it!
  86. You must be kidding me by Noose+For+A+Neck · · Score: 1

    If it's revolutionary to do this by measuring noise at the source rather than from the center of the goddamn room, well, I guess they should've looked at the noise-cancelling-headphones industry, which have been doing this for years. What kind of dumbass measures the noise away from the source and then tries to compensate for all the reflections and distortions that could occur in the path between the source and the reciever?

    --

    Software piracy is victimless theft.

  87. BAH i have watercooling by zippo01 · · Score: 0

    Bah i have watercooling what good does this do me? The fans aren't in the case at all. Bastards getting my hopes up like that.

  88. I read that wrong by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    I thought it was, "BYU project to silence Cougar fans." But then I realized that the football team isn't a new project, so I knew I was mistaken.

  89. Doesn't work for me by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    I have tried the noise reduction headphones, and I can hear the cancellation noise just as loud as the other noise. I am guessing this affects other people too. If noise cancellation is an issue, why not run another fan exactly out of phase, rather than try to generate a noise that is the "opposite"? I think you'd have better results if it was a real fan (despite that the power drain would be 2x).

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Doesn't work for me by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      I have mod points but I have to respond to this.

      I have tried the noise reduction headphones, and I can hear the cancellation noise just as loud as the other noise.

      You hear the artifacts of incomplete noise cancellation.

      If noise cancellation is an issue, why not run another fan exactly out of phase, rather than try to generate a noise that is the "opposite"? I think you'd have better results if it was a real fan (despite that the power drain would be 2x).

      OK, genius: how exactly do you run the other fan "out of phase" with the first fan -- without affecting the airflow (and hence the cooling)?

      Acoustic noise cancellation, especially for something as simple as a computer fan in a case, is a homework problem in any grad-school course in Adaptive Signal Processing.

  90. BYU silences more than computer fans by billmoss · · Score: 0

    I came across this yesterday:

    from Google's cache.

    I don't sprechen sie mormon, but the bottom images are telling...

    It's been so long since I've been at the U (Mosaic just came out, think The Internet Adaptor (TIA)), do most universities do this now?

    1. Re:BYU silences more than computer fans by althalus · · Score: 1

      Some do, but BYU is a little bit of a different case, as they are a Private U, not state. They do run filters on their own net services.

      As for the protestor above the bottom pic, that's nothing, you should see the amazing things people say that the LDS church does. Walking in SLC during the conference time is amazing, I've been charged with being everything form a murderer to the devil incarnate for being a member of the LDS church.

    2. Re:BYU silences more than computer fans by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 1

      Actually, two things wrong.

      You didn't read the bottom screen carefully. It specifically states that you can access the blocked web page through a different computer in a different building. BYU has heavy filters on all of their public access kiosks (ones that anybody can walk up to and get on... there's a lot of them on campus) and it's actually pretty smart to have that.

      Second thing, the filters they used to run have actually been removed and modified. Living on campus (here at BYU), I had to deal with an annoyance every once in awhile, but if you call up the office of IT, they generally will review the page and put it up if they feel it is within the bounds. With that said, all blocks have been removed since I lived on campus (about a month ago I moved off campus).

      Third, I forgive you. You're from the U... that's always telling. ;-) (Just kidding! JUST KIDDING! Yay for school rivalaries.)

  91. This is why much science is going nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, this is hardly science, this is actually engineering. Where's the theory, the hypotheses, the new knowledge learned? All this is, is a simply refinement of current understanding or technique.

    Secondly, what a waste of educational dollars. In the end, I'm not sure what was learned or what was taught. As well, I wonder how much he spent when he "built an [aluminium] enclosure that mimicked a typical computer chassis". Why not just use an old discarded case? This sort of waste is just as evidently rampant there as it is here. Truly, I wonder at the way privileged people play with public money.

    This sort of engineering properly belongs in the R&D departments of case and fan manufacturers.

  92. What about bladeless/Tesla fans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't a stack of discs make less noise?

  93. Physics? by leinhos · · Score: 1

    It's never been clear to me how this is supposed to work from the standpoint of conservation of energy (I've read several dissertations on the subject). Is the canceling source (the anti-source) supposed to dissipate the energy in the traveling sound pressure wave (a-la active damper), thereby stopping the sound from propagating, or does the source provide short-term energy storage to reshape the spacial sound pressure field distribution, or is there some non-linear effect that redistributes the sound spectrally (translating peaked spectra to lower-level flat spectra -- a sound whitener)?

  94. Projectors? by ...+James+... · · Score: 1

    This would be great for projectors. My home theater projector's fans, while quiet at somewhere around 30db, can be annoying at times. I'd love to have active noise cancellation, assuming it didn't affect the sound coming out of my speakers.

  95. Fight! by Zardus · · Score: 1

    We must fight the oppressive powers and not let our fans be silenced! It is our duty to protect Fans' Freedom of Speach!

    --
    You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
  96. Yes, much simpler than..Hear no evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you know why distributed, networked computers are the future (aka blades and terminals). Why complain about computer noise and heat when the machine is down in the basement?

    1. Re:Yes, much simpler than..Hear no evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me know when I can play UT2004 through a terminal.

      Until video cards start coming with ethernet jacks, there's still some things server/terminal setups can't replace.

  97. White noise is a Good Thing by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    How about being to sleep with a PC on 24/7?

    Some people actually like the noise from their fans.

    I know that I can't sleep unless my computer is on. I need the white noise produced by my fans in order to sleep. In fact, even if I'm not trying to sleep, I can't stand being in my room if the computer's off (which it rarely is, unless there's a power outage) because I'm so used to the white noise from its fans.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  98. LDS missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, they come in pairs.

  99. frictionless, less turbulent fans? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why can't they replace the bearings with magnets? And shape the fan blades to avoid the wasteful noise entirely, at least in the audible band?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You could, but the fan would have to be oriented in a specific manner. Either flat or on one side. Unless you used some funky position-tracking adaptive system, but that would be much more expensive.

    2. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The fan is mounted in the airflow path, to pressurize the airflow. What are these other orientation constraints you mention?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Well, if you want something to float using magnets, the force of the magnet has to be balanced by the force of gravity. That means that if you, for example, surround the fan with a ring of magnets, your fan will have an equal force from the magnets on all sides, and nothing will be left to counter the force of gravity.

      The only solution I could think of was to have a half-ring of magnets.

      But I forgot one vital bit of information...the force of interacting magnetic fields decreases with the distance. (I forget what the exact relationship is.) Which means that something could conceivably be held to the center by a ring of magnets..

    4. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1

      Yea, cause you really want magnets near your hard drive right :p

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
    5. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1
      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      Well, that's easier said than done. First of all the Brushless DC fan has a rotating magnet inside the rotor, and its position is sensed to determine when to turn on the driving transistors. The driving transistors turn on a fixed electromagnet to oppose the permanent magnet at the proper position and push it around. In order to have nagnetic bearings, the existing magnet would have to be taken into account. Secondly, the suspension magnet require enough mangetic force to overcome the force of the blades against the air; Otherwise the fan would push into the end of the shaft. Thirdly, the suspension system would need two ring magnetice at each end to hold the rotor in place without touching the sides. So far, we have six magnets. I bought some rare earth magnetics last week, and they are not cheap. Now the $4.00 fan has half its cost in magnets, and it has become a $6.00 fan. Need I say more?

    7. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'd pay $20 for a silent fan. Sell me one!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by po8 · · Score: 1

      I own a TMD fan. Bought it at Fry's: forget the brand. Still uses conventional bearings, though. Check out this page for more info.

    9. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Seems "cool" ;). Is yours quieter than one that is't "gomphic"?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans? by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      But would you pay $40?, and can you get the computer manufacturer to mount the fan so it stays quite?
      If the rotor blades are smashing the air against an obstacle or holes in a panel, it becomes noisy again.
      On the other hand, can you find another 100,000 people to go in with you so the production price will be low enough for the company to sell you that fan for $20. If materials and manufacturing cost more than about $8.00, they can barely afford to package and ship it for $20.

  100. SilenX fans by JAgostoni · · Score: 1

    I bought a few fans from SilenX and I'll tell you they are the quietest fans I have used yet. I usually stuck with the Panaflo's but I am definitely a convert. (not to sound like a salesman).

  101. Excellent idea. I want them. Now. by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

    I'm glad someone has made the appropriate logical connection, from applying this technology to some giant industrial machine, to applying it to individual computer parts. I was thinking about it last week, but then I didn't _do_ anything about it. It seems so much simpler, in the long run; instead of silent components, just make silence.

    I do wonder, however, whether a defective implementation would _increase_ the noise level. Best to be careful, and you'd better be able to disconnect the silencer when it becomes a shrieker.

  102. wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an amateur sound engineer and I have a complete understanding of phase cancellation.

    It doesn't take a PhD to figure this out.... Several commonly available sound engineering books cover it in considerable detail.

  103. i sleep with the case sides off my pc. by adamgeek · · Score: 1

    HSF and exhaust fan running full blast, plus a 24" box fan blowing into the case to keep the drives cool. actually helps me sleep.. if the box fan is off, i find it harder to sleep.

    i'm not everyone though.

  104. Question for anybody that may know... by Kwelstr · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they use instead of a fan an "ionic breeze" system like the one the sharper image uses in its air purifiers?

    I've been thinking of those for a long time cause they are really silent and they do move air. But I really do not know if they can work inside a computer cage.

    --


    ~~~Please pass the salt, I hate unsalted MD5s :-/
    1. Re:Question for anybody that may know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that the ionization of the air and the charged plates would disrupt data

    2. Re:Question for anybody that may know... by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      The probleem of cooling Micros is that the heat is quite centralized.

      A large slow fan would as you suggest move the same air - but it would fail to produce the airspeed neccessary in a finite location.

      The problem is primarily economic.

      power supplies have been engineered by cost to such a point that any alternative tends to be much more expensive - because it loses the advantage of low cost design AND the advantage of high scale production at the same time.

      Likewise motherboards - which if they were designed in an aerodynamic case COULD use less cooling - simply don't because the motherboard would them be a custom design and less suitable for a mass production.

      The issue then is really one of consumer awareness. If the TV add with Steven saying "Mrs. Mclehattle is getting a QUIET DELL" doesn't move people as much as the "more for less" slogan - the mass market isn't likely to shift off of dirt cheap mode.

      Which in final analysis suggests that noise control by and large will be a user level customization - until moore's law renders a useful machine without the need for cooling - which is quite predictable given there are solid state models on the market now with higher speeds than the first pentium.

      AIK

    3. Re:Question for anybody that may know... by Kwelstr · · Score: 1

      Thanks, great answer.

      --


      ~~~Please pass the salt, I hate unsalted MD5s :-/
    4. Re:Question for anybody that may know... by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      Another Point - as long as computers are sold in the same room as large screen TVs with booming surround sound (in 24hr demo mode of course) The relatively inert sound from a computer is not likely to strike the consumer at the point of purchase.

  105. Fan with more blades? by xluap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about a fan with more blades, for example 20 or 30 smaller blades?

    Using a lower rpm, the fan with more blades could blow the same amount of air as a normal fan, but run MUCH quiter.

  106. Oversize heat sinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Athlon XP 2600+ needs to dissipate a lot of heat with a good heatsink and fan. I turn my PC off several times per day so that I do not need to listen to the noise all the time. Unfortunately, it is right next to my bed. I use a monster sized heat sink with a larger than usual 80mm fan for the CPU instead of the normal high speed 60mm fans. It uses the extra large CPU fan so that it can be run slower and quiter but, I have not been able to get the fan to go slow enough. When I turn the knob all the way to the left the CPU fan only slows down to about 2700 RPMs. At least that is a heck of a lot quiter than how it sounds at 4500 RPMs. If I remember correctly, the BIOS usually says that the CPU is about 53 degrees Celsius on the die with the fan set to 2700 RPMs.

    My heat sink is too heavy to be mounted with clips on the Athlon XP processor. It uses the alternate method of 4 bolts through the 4 holes that already were in the motherboard. I once used a fan that ran at about 1900 RPMs which was nice and the temp was ok. I would like to find a fan which runs at about 2300 RMPs and has the speed controlled by either a thermistor or knob. I know someone who has a newer version of the BIOS on the same motherboard and his BIOS shuts the computer down whenever he tries to run his fan that slowly. If I ever need to upgrade to that version of the BIOS it may think my fan has failed and shut the computer down.

    There are over 50 different heat sinks made for most CPS. Most are small heat sinks with 60 mm fans running at high speed. Some are larger heat sinks with slower or occasionally even larger fans. There is at least one heat sink made that uses heat pipes for passive cooling. There are also water cooling kits. I wonder which is best?

    Most newer video cards now have fans. A few months ago one computer magazine reviewed a video card that did not need a fan. I wonder if it works with Linux? I would gladly buy the active noise cancellation kit BYU is developing even if it was fairly expensive. I would prefer to not have to shut down my computer repeatedly throught the day and then later reboot just to avoid the noise. Perhaps my trouble is that I have not listened to enough loud music at bars and elsewhere over the decades. My hearing is still reasonably good at the age of 49. To me the noise from many of the new computers is unacceptable. Perhaps I could drastically underclock the CPU and then find a way to slow the fan way down.

  107. Does NR reduce SPL by Monoman · · Score: 1

    IANAE so I am wondering if using out of phase noise cancelling approaches actually reduces the SPL on your ears.... or does it just drown out the original noise with another noise that renders them virtually silent.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  108. Re:frictionless, less turbulent fans == WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because knowledge of how to shape blades to bring wasteful vibrations to a minimum is controlled as a weapons manufacturing knowledge. (http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/cong ress/1989_cr/h890413-spy.htm)

  109. Re:Maybe its not the fan. Keep the Horse in front! by cmacb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, to REALLY get the horse before the cart I'd hope that SOMEONE would focus on building computers WITHOUT FANS. Apple has done this, others have. Heat sinks and convection can go a long way, especially when the computers we are used to these days are vertically oriented to begin with. Put the hot stuff at the bottom of a case with a tube over them that allows the hot air to by sucked up to a vent at the top. A slow fan could kick in to assist if things started to overheat. There are fans that operate at a few undred RPM and are almost silent but still move a good amount of air.

    Maybe there needs to be a new version of computer hobbiest called "Underclockers" who take a 3G processor designed to fry eggs and runs it at 700Mhz without a fan. Meanwhile I'm sitting here browsing Slashdot with a 3D mega triangle video card with its own fan and 64M of memory. Does anyone make a video card these days that is both (1) really fast, and (2) doesn't have all the horsepower and programming to do 3D rendering? Hardly. I don't MIND the 3D capabilities per-se, but I've known many people already that have had to replace their video cards after they burn out, and often I think the culprit here is accumulation of dust in and around the video cards fan. I get a BIT of dust on my case fan when I open it up from time to time, but the tiny fan on the video card is almost always close to being clogged with what they used to call "dust bunnies". Eventually some of these apparently accumulate to the point where the fan just ejects them onto whatever component is below. Some of these case designs go beyond what I'd call "bad" to downright incompetent. Or could it be deliberate planned obsolescence?

    I'm still hanging onto my old Dells, some of which, as mentioned above are designed to be quiet (even with a fan). I'll get my wallet out again when the systems appear to be designed to last and run quietly. My stereo equipment puts out some heat as does my TV and THEY don't have fans. When the most complex thing I use my computer for makes it act a whole lot like a stereo system or TV you have to ask where did we go wrong here. (I know the answer, but I'll get labeled a troll if I say it, so I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader).

  110. Silence of the fans by harley_frog · · Score: 1
    Hannibal Lecter: NO! I will listen now. After your father's murder, you were orphaned. You were ten years old. You went to live with cousins on a sheep and horse ranch in Utah. And...?

    Clarice Starling: [tears begin forming in her eyes] And one morning, I just ran away.

    Hannibal Lecter: No "just", Clarice. What set you off? You started at what time?

    Clarice Starling: Early, still dark.

    Hannibal Lecter: Then something woke you, didn't it? Was it a dream? What was it?

    Clarice Starling: I heard a strange noise.

    Hannibal Lecter: What was it?

    Clarice Starling: It was - screaming. Some kind of screaming, like a child's voice.

    Hannibal Lecter: What did you do?

    Clarice Starling: I went downstairs, outside. I crept up into the barn. I was so scared to look inside, but I had to.

    Hannibal Lecter: And what did you see, Clarice? What did you see?

    Clarice Starling: Fans. The fans were screaming.

    Hannibal Lecter: They were suppressing the CPU fans?

    Clarice Starling: And they were screaming.

    Hannibal Lecter: And you ran away?

    Clarice Starling: No. First I tried to free them. I-I opened the gate to their pen, but they wouldn't run. They just stood there, confused. They wouldn't run.

    Hannibal Lecter: But you could and you did, didn't you?

    Clarice Starling: Yes. I took one fan, and I ran away as fast as I could.

    Hannibal Lecter: Where were you going, Clarice?

    Clarice Starling: I don't know. I didn't have any food, any water and it wasvery cold, very cold. I thought, I thought if I could save just one, but - he was so heavy. So heavy. I didn't get more than a few miles when the sheriff's car picked me up. The rancher was so angry he sent me to live at the Mormon orphanage in Provo. I never saw the ranch again.

    Hannibal Lecter: What became of your fan, Clarice?

    Clarice Starling: They killed him.

    --
    It's all fun and games until someone loses the key to the handcuffs.
  111. Try 5 Volts by daina · · Score: 1
    Most computer fans run off the 12V supply. I upgraded and old PII server to a Celeron 1.1GHz to play movies and music in the living room (tualatin system - hacked BIOS). It works great, but noise is much more of an issue than it was in the server room.

    I re-soldered the take-offs for the fan power to the 5V leads (red vs. yellow). The machine stays adequately cool with the (3) fans running at the lower voltage, and I can't hear them at all.

    On another note, the hard drive was causing a lot of noise during access. I found that there were two reasons for this: one, the drive was very fragmented from having (ahem) large files constantly copied on to it and then deleted, and the NNTP client was contributing significantly to the fragmentation. Here's what I did:

    (1) Installed an old 6GB hard drive just for the NNTP message headers.

    (2) Defragmented the main HD with O&O and left it resident.

    (3) Established a RAM disk for the browser cache while I was at it.

    Now the machine runs as near silent as I can imagine, and much faster.

    Incidentally, I painted it black (including the drive faces and bay inserts) with Krylon Fusion, "The no-prep superbond paint for plastic". I have never been a fan of painted computer cases, but the Krylon product does a great job without actually doing a proper prep and spraying with an expensive two-part paint.

  112. Re:Maybe its not the fan. Keep the Horse in front! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ass

  113. mag(ic)nets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking of a ring shaped magnet, in a ring shaped track with sides enclosing the magnet. Like a monorail bent into a ring. If the facing sides of the ring and track are the same polarity, the inner ring will hover. Neodymium magnets, like in mobile headphones, have enough force:weight to float the suspended ring and plenty of plastic blades attached within, and shaping the ring can allow magnetic pulses to force the ring to spin. Voila! For my next trick, I seal the ring inside the track, balancing the fan disc magnetically inside a split leaving gaps smaller than O2 molecules, sealing a vacuum inside, for no friction in the "bearing" at all.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:mag(ic)nets by John+Starks · · Score: 1

      Keep your neodymium magnets away from my hard drives, please.

    2. Re:mag(ic)nets by karnal · · Score: 1

      That's a really good idea, until someone decides to bump the case. Then you need to make sure that any friction that is caused by knocking the assembly off-balance doesn't shred plastic or magnet....

      Of course, then once you have plastic shards stuck between the magnets, you'll have constant crunch. Right?

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:mag(ic)nets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Your hard drives have magnets in them, such as the ones that spin the platter, and retract the head. So does your noisy fan.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:mag(ic)nets by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Sure - and the spinning fan also has other erratic behavior. So I coat the nearby moving parts with teflon!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:mag(ic)nets by John+Starks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those magnets aren't strong enough to unintentionally destroy my data.

    6. Re:mag(ic)nets by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, those magnets are usually Neodymium. (sp)

  114. Vacuum.. by Piranhaa · · Score: 0

    I wonder if creating a case where it was sealed, and came with a pump to create a vacuum inside the case if would be possible. We know that sound doesn't travel in a vacuum I hope. Just a project someone might want to consider :)

    1. Re:Vacuum.. by darthCodex · · Score: 1

      In a vacuum there's not exactly air to cool the cpu now is there... ;-)

      --
      Supplies!
  115. Hmm by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    Did they try wrapping the fans in magic underwear?

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  116. Try the Zalman TNN500A - The Whole Case Heatsink by Elm0 · · Score: 1

    http://www.zalmanusa.com/ (Go to Zalman TNN500A, couldn't get a direct link due to flash menu system)

    This thing is a triumph of brute force engineering, but also extreme elegance in design. Basically THE ENTIRE case is made from Aluminium between 5mm and 7mm which is connected using heatpipes to the graphics card and CPU and simply dissipates the heat output passively into the surroundings. You can use the latest parts, the dissipation is rated up to 150W CPU heat output and 50W GPU output. The PSU uses VERY high quality components and is totally fanless. You can get a UPS system built into the bottom as an option as well. I think Athlon64 and Pentium4 CPUs are currently supported.

    This idea of using sound to create sound is a no goer in a recording studio where the control room needs to be completely silent and presumably countless scientific and engineering applications. You could have the PC in another room, but this would definetly be prefferable for the majority of users.

    Yep, its seriously expensive (not sure, maybe up to GBP1000), but it works flawlessly, looks great, and is ideal for conditions where complete silence is a must, not just noise reduction. Compared to other bits of kit that probably will be sitting in the same area (5000 Vintage Mics or a soundproof room) its a small price to pay really.

  117. Hey! by namespan · · Score: 1

    His name is my name too!

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  118. Placing the tower in the other room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like you have found the best solution and have quieted everyting down but, here is another alternative. I have two Monitors, keyboards and mice all attached to my tower case through Y-adaptors. A monitor and keyboard is on each side of the wall so that I can use the computer from either room. Noise is only a problem in the room that has the tower. Using the computer from the other room is so much more relaxing and quiet. The computers various cables all go through the wall. In the quiet room all that is heard is the clickety-clackety of my mechanical keyboard.

    That would be one possible solution for someone who really wants silence? They could place the tower and all the noisy components on the other side of the wall. Anyone doing that should be sure to not exceed the maximum rated distance for each type of cable that the computer uses. One drawback is that it does result in a messy bundle of cables going through the wall. At least it is hidden behind the furniture in both rooms.

    Is your diskless solution a thin-client or is that something different? I don't know much about that.

  119. Speaking of Horrible Headline Writing... by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 0, Troll

    About 3 years ago, BYU's school newspaper (The Daily Universe) ran a front page story on a University ran service project...

    "BYU Helps Rape Victims"

  120. *YAWN* REPEAT ARTICLE by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    Sorry CmdrTaco, we've had this news before: Cancelling Out CPU Fan Noise, 16-Mar-2004

  121. New York Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't you guys tired of finding new ways of saying that you don't like that NYT requires registration now ?

    "Drop of human blood required"
    "Sacrifice of firstborn required"
    "Satan worship required"

    How about these:

    "Burning down neighbours house required"
    "Mandatory stripsearch required"
    "Left lung donation required"

    or just plain old:
    "Registration required" ? ... nah, too simple

  122. Dark Skin != evil in the Book of Mormon by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    "Oh yes, and as for the American Indians with dark skin, if you read the actual text of the Book of Mormon you would know that in the last days they are to be one of the most blessed peoples of earth and that in the days after Christ were among the most righteous on earth."

    True, and, in fact, a close examination of the Book of Mormon reveals that some of the most righteous and inspiring people at times were indeed dark skinned (Lamanites): Samuel, King Lamoni and his father and brother, the people of Ammon, the two thousand stripling warriors...etc.

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  123. Not all chaste! W00t! by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    I for one whole-heartedly endorse BYU Coeds :-)

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  124. Re:Maybe its not the fan. Keep the Horse in front! by D_Gr8_BoB · · Score: 1

    Custom-built quiet PCs. I'm not affiliated with them in any way, I just think it's a good idea and am probably going to buy one.

  125. Re:Maybe its not the fan. Keep the Horse in front! by mph · · Score: 0, Troll
    Let's not get the cart in front of the horse here, and for those non-USA people, that means "Let's get things in the proper order".
    Perhaps one day the people in those backwards nations will have "carts" and "horses" for themselves, and the wisdom to understand which goes first, so they can appreciate our American sayings. We can only hope.
  126. What idiot modded this redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twas a joke! Yea verily, much motions with bladder-on-stick.

    See? The amusing person posted multiple times to reply to a parent that said the story had been posted before.

    Moderators! Geez! And no, I'm not chicken for posting as AC, I'm just posting from a different machine and can't remember my password.

  127. Yes, much simpler than..Hear no evil-extensions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get yourself one of these. That should be long enough for most houses.

  128. Cart before the horse...? by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    You can see how our friends in Soviet Russia might be confused by this saying.

  129. White Noise by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    I wish people would stop trying to silence computer fans. I can't sleep -without- them. A humming computer lets me know the world is right, and good, and that it's safe to close my eyes.

  130. No fans would be better by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1
    No fans would be better.

    The article talks about canceling the sound from 'the' fan. Some people have lots of fans in their case. There's the powersupply fan, a possible GPU fan, a possible north bridge fan, and possible fans on the case for extra air flow. Also there's the HD and optical drive making noise. These noises should all be eliminated muffled, pc drone gets on my nerves now and my next pc will different.

    You can already make a dead silent pc without sacrificing performance or resorting to this complicated gadget. Get big passive heatsinks for the cpu and gpu. They look like this. It works on regular cps and seems to be a much simpler solution than four sensors four speakers and a signal processing unit.

    This guy has lots of hints for reducing noise and that's just the first hit on google.

    The fan on my video card died and I didn't notice so I lost the card. It was only a geforceMX but I'm a little bitter.

    Fans die. Wether I notice in time isn't imortant to me, it's still a pain.

  131. The Journal of Discourses by ink · · Score: 1
    The Journal of Discourses wasn't some personal diary of Brigham Young. Several mormon prophets wrote doctrine in it, among the gems:
    • Non-whites were "less valiant" in the pre-existence, and so their curse is to live in ignorance and slavery in this life (also taught in the Book of Mormon and D&C)
    • It's better that a man kill his adultrous wife to save her by "blood atonement" than to let her die with her sins
    • Adam was god the father
    • Homosexuality and adultry are sins only surpassed by murder
    • The Catholic church is the whore of all the world and the church of Satan (also taught in Book of Momon somewhat)
    • Man cannot get into the highest degree of heaven (the "celestial" kingdom) without having multiple wives
    • Women can't get into the same place without the permission (and proper handshakes "through the veil") without her husband
    Go look for yourself if you don't believe me.
    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
    1. Re:The Journal of Discourses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Homosexuality and adultry are sins only surpassed by murder"

      What's wrong with believing that? It's more than possible to believe that homosexuality and adultery are sins without treating gays and adulterers any worse than anyone else.

      As long as they aren't teaching people to discriminate against gays (which they may or may not , I don't know, but simply teaching that it's a sin is no worse than teaching that eating meat is a sin) what's wrong?

  132. Just DESIGN the damn things better, like Apple... by csoto · · Score: 1

    The G5 is quite possibly the quietest desktop around, except for maybe their quieter fanless iMacs. Considering how well a G5 works, it's simply amazing how little noise it puts out...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  133. Hissing is fine - stop the BASS in thump rockets by jimmy+page · · Score: 1

    Who really cares about noisey fans/hard drives. No big deal. They won't wake me up at night like so 15 year old poser in his tricked out Civic with more bass wattage than horsepower.

    Stop that noise and I'll buy 10.

  134. I Think by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    I think it's just my fan readings that are off. My computer is dead quiet when that CPU fan is throttled to 50 (i bought all quiet other components). Still, I'd like to run that fan at full RPM for XviD encoding. I can't do that on a hot summer day without throttling it up.

    --
    Photos.
  135. Quiter Fans by subzerorz · · Score: 1

    Why not just replace with quieter fans.. They have those available now.

    --
    Subzerorz
    More Articles
  136. Secret Mormon Mafia? by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

    "BYU Project to Silence Computer Fans"

    Ok, so who else read that and thought some Luddite Mormon Mafia was going around and breaking geeks kneecaps?

    --
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
  137. Springville by Jelizabug · · Score: 1

    I'm always glad to see fellow members on slashdot. :) Last semester, my sister lived pretty close to you (University Villa). I've been in Springville for a year and a half now, and I love it down here. The singles ward is a little bit older than the BYU wards, which is nice. Definitely agree with what you said - while Utah is far from perfect, it is a refreshing change having friends who believe the same things I do.

    Anyway, just wanted to say "hi" and I'm glad to see you guys speaking out.

  138. Re:rundown on booting redhat 9 diskless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, please.
    nusrat
    AT
    rocketmail
    DOT
    COM