Slashdot Mirror


Networking in the Danger Zone?

Croaker-bg asks: "I currently am an Information Security/ Network Engineer for a large government contract firm and have recently seen several solicitations come across email regarding gigs in the Middle East and surrounding regions, including both Iraq and Afghanistan. Understanding that the pay might be good for being willing to face the hazards, I continue to have my curiosity perked by these short-term jaunts. Lately however, the news of fellow contractors being abducted has put a new spin on the hazards of working abroad in these areas. Has anyone survived such a trip and lived to tell the tale with a fat wallet? If so, would you consider doing it again or is it just to dangerous?"

691 comments

  1. no time for love dr jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you cant spend money when your dead.

    1. Re:no time for love dr jones by nihaopaul · · Score: 5, Insightful

      its not all about the money but of the experiance, somtimes its good to get out of a country you were born and raised, think of it as a cultural experiance, as long as your smart and keep safe (like not going to american bars) then you'll do fine, but you do have to look into what you'll be provided in terms of safety/housing/security/contingency. if the company is putting together a good package then it could be worth it. i don't live in a dangerous place but i would go just for a change of life. but don't go thinking it'll all be 'sweet' n stuff cause you will be put under stress/difficault positions. i live in china, not the most chalenging of places but if i didn't move here from the uk i'd probably not have ever left the uk! it'll be an experiance! and don't believe everything you see on CNN! their in the business to make money, and violance sells! (so does sex, human hardships and google) try it, if you are uncomfortable you can always come back! remmeber to read that contact good 'n' stuff!

    2. Re:no time for love dr jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      don't believe everything you see on CNN! their in the business to make money, and violance sells!

      So, there really haven't been a number of civilian contractors recently tortured, shot, and beheaded in Iraq? I knew CNN was making all that up, down to publishing the videos of Nick Berg's "death" on the web...

      I'm not one to blindly buy everything the media is selling, but I'd probably guess that in this case, assuming Iraq is a dangerous place and that going there might get you killed is not an unreasonable conclusion.

    3. Re:no time for love dr jones by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      I recall a story in iirc Datamation magazine some 20 years ago about a Mainframe sysadmin in Beirut. He was running a IBM 370 series but what was interesting was the bullet holes in the core units (thats memory to the younger geeks among us ;) It seems the delivery of the machine happened coincidentally with one of the perenial flair-ups of violence in that town. The story was about the most interesting assignments IBM "CEs" (as their repair guys were called) had faced. Tain't nothing new under the sun folks...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:no time for love dr jones by Lokinator · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're *going* to do it, it's just not true that you've gotta be gun-free and you can't shoot back. From what I hear, quite a few contractors have acquired assault prevention devices and have utilized them successfully and quietly.

      Before you do, however, I strongly sugest you look into the courses available at the Gunsite Academy or with Massad Ayoob's group or LFI..and take all you can afford before boarding that plane.

      --
      "It is morally wrong to initiate the aggressive use of force.." Of course, defensive force is fair game...
    5. Re:no time for love dr jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The contracts most companies require their employees to sign specify that they will not be armed: the exceptions are the companies like Blackwater which are providing security.

      Up to you whether you carry anyway, but some companies will not only fire you if you are caught, you could have to pay them a penalty and possibly get prosecuted by US authorities. Of course, better to be judged by twelve than carried by six...

    6. Re:no time for love dr jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of going as a contractor, go as a GS. Most GS positions specifically state that you will be wearing DCU's, have M16 or 6mm training and will probably wear your weapon and "battle rattle" while you're in a hostile area. Pay not be as good, but its well worth the extra security the GS positions allow.

      These positions may be posted in Europe, but there are positions that get deployed and are hired specifically for deployment. I would do this if I didn't have a wife in the Army who has asked several times that I not do this type of thing. To her, its bad enough when one of us gets deployed. Check out the European Jobs Page for more info. Besides, on top of the combat pay, etc - you get at least a 3 year vacation in Europe for free.

    7. Re:no time for love dr jones by wbhauck · · Score: 1
      The media focuses on these sensational kidnappings and murders. No doubt, they are horrific. But in 2001 (latest statistics I could find) you had a good chance of being killed in your US workplace. From: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/workplaceviolence/
      Its most extreme form, homicide, is the third-leading cause of fatal occupational injury in the United States. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI), there were 639 workplace homicides in 2001 in the United States, out of a total of 8,786 fatal work injuries.
    8. Re:no time for love dr jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not all about the money but of the experiance, somtimes its good to get out of a country you were born and raised, think of it as a cultural experiance,

      I agree with what you're saying, but there ARE safer places to experience other cultures. To anybody who wishes to visit a predominantly Muslim country I would recommend Turkey as a "training ground". I lived there for a year, and while I'm sure things are much more hostile to certain Westerners due to the war, compared with most Muslim countries the Turkish government definitely has things under control in my opinion.

      On top of that, if you're not an asshole and asking for the local McDonalds (there aren't any in Sinop anyway) you just might even make a few friends. ;)

    9. Re:no time for love dr jones by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      I worked in a computer repair company over there for a short while.... the place was robbed about once a week. I was once shot in my leg because I couldn't reach my gun quick enough (kept under the counter, 9mm )

      I was paid more than here in the states but I wouldn't do it again, being shot was when I decided to move back to the US. That robber could have been less mercyful and shot me in my chest and killed me.

    10. Re:no time for love dr jones by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 1

      The point he's making is that there are thousands of Westerners living in Saudi Arabia, and one died. It's not a daily occurrance.

    11. Re:no time for love dr jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy worked for Lockheed Martin... that may just have something todo w/ why he was kidknapped which goes over and above the fact that it was just some random American.

    12. Re:no time for love dr jones by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

      exactly, get a gun, and know how to use it.

      If it were me going over there, I wouldn't walk around with no less than a small 9mm in an ankle holster, 45 in a side holster, and if I'm in a vehicle, an assualt rifle. And learn how to use them, especially under stress. Anyone can shoot a pistol, not many can when someone else is firing back at you. Take some classes.

      And as several other people suggested, get a good tan before you go over, if its during the winter, go to a tanning bed for about 2 months beforehand.

      I would also try other things to blend in. Let your hair grow out, grow a beard (remember, if you get over there and they don't blend in, you can always cut them then).

      Try to walk like your not a texas farm boy, You'll get over there and be nervous as all hell, and it will show.

    13. Re:no time for love dr jones by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1
      So, there really haven't been a number of civilian contractors recently tortured, shot, and beheaded in Iraq? I knew CNN was making all that up, down to publishing the videos of Nick Berg's "death" on the web...

      Not exaclty what he meant. The *only* stories CNN covers regarding Iraq are those of violence. Not a single story about the rebuilt schools, infrastructure, or any of that. In fact, you'd think the country was simply crumbling apart, when it's not.
      Now, for some perspective, how many murders, rapes, and arsons were reported in your local news today ? How about for your entire state ? Or tri-state area ? How many murders does a state like California, stated to be about the overall area of Iraq, see in a month, or a year? What if the news never covered any of the non violent events in your state ? It would sound like a hell hole to live in. Maybe yours is, or maybe it isn't. The point is the way the messages are conveyed and in what context.
      Sensationalism. The term was coined pre-depression era. The practice has been in use ever since. Just to quote a snippet from the NY University's web page, which in turn was lifted from the Grolier Encyclopedia:
      William Randolph Hearst, an admirer of Pulitzer, took control of his father's San Francisco Examiner in 1887, then purchased the New York Journal in 1895. In their battle for circulation leadership in New York, Hearst and Pulitzer cut the price of their newspapers to a penny, tried to hire away each other's editors and reporters and filled their papers with even more bloody, bizarre and salacious stories. Pulitzer and particularly Hearst also crusaded, with huge front-page headlines and emotional, sometimes misleading stories, for war with Spain over Cuba. "How do you like the Journal's war?" Hearst's paper asked after war broke out in 1898. Circulations for both newspapers sometimes topped a million copies a day.
      http://www.nyu.edu/classes/stephens/Collier's%20pa ge.htm

      Do a search on Joseph Pulizter or Randolph Hearst and you'd find yourself wondering why any self respecting, honest journalist would covet the Pulizter Prize. Also see, "Yellow Journalism".
      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    14. Re:no time for love dr jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have to agree with you.

      I've moved around all my life.
      Spent 3 years living in Turkey, 2 years in Thailand, France... and have made lots of trips to Egypt recently. Despite everything that you hear on the news Egypt and Turkey are still two wonderful countries. All the time I felt really safe when i was there. I even went in small villages bordering the white desert and had the chance to talk to some local people, who invited my group to their house for tea. There we got to meet their whole family. It was obviously not the most luxurious house (i.e. made out of clay) but despite that we still got a very warm welcome.

      Although that could be because we were Canadians and everybody likes Canadians :)

      Don't trust what you see on the news 99.999% of people around the world are extremely nice people and welcome the change to talk with people from halfway across the world. The .001% only seems more important because of the vast attention they get in the media.

    15. Re:no time for love dr jones by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but this has to be about the stupidest thing written in this whole thread! Get a tan? Grow a beard? Carry tonnes of weaponry with you? How exactly does that help you blend in when you're driving in a convoy of 4x4s escorted by private security contractors or US soldiers on your way to whichever govt site you're working on?

      Whatever you do, it's going to be blatantly obvious you're not Iraqi and even if you are Iraqi, it's not going to stop you being a target!

      What use is an assault rifle when someone's popping up from behind a wall and shooting an RPG at you?

      Do you think any of the professional security guys protecting you are going to want some halfwitted gung-ho American armed to the teeth under their care?

    16. Re:no time for love dr jones by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1
      Tain't nothing new under the sun folks...

      What about a time machine? Or a man with four asses? I'm pretty sure they've never existed.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    17. Re:no time for love dr jones by gotih · · Score: 1

      going to another country can expand your world view but going to the middle east or afghanistan right now will be a work trip and little more. unless you are willing to be captured and loose yer head. go somewhere "safe" if you want to expand your world view while working -- china, japan, europe, some countries in africa, even pakistan are better choices at this point.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    18. Re:no time for love dr jones by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --I'm pretty sure that somewhere, there is a monkey with four asses. I saw it on TV once. There were these four kids, see...
      :b

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    19. Re:no time for love dr jones by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

      yeah, but if something is shooting at me, I sure as hell want to be able to shoot back.

  2. You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously. Mods - hear me out before hitting "troll." Stand on the street and sell weed. You would make a lot of money. Yes, it's true that if things go badly you end up in jail. But if things go badly in Iraq, you end up dead. Death is permanent. With jail, you get out after a year or two, and you have a chance to put your life back together.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    1. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      (Score:-1, Interesting)

      You are the King of the Trolls!

    2. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Death by terrorists is, literally, nothing, after a few possible days of torture and a few years of good job, followed by practically worldwide sympathy. Jail is a few years of you rotting, preceded by a few years of an illegal job below your knowledge, followed by a criminal record.

      I would prefer the void of death to the destroyed life of jail. Frankly, I wonder why this guy facing the death penalty is fighting to the Supreme Court for life in prison; isn't death preferable?

    3. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The article said: "Has anyone survived such a trip and lived to tell the tale with a fat wallet?"

      Your motives are all wrong. Go if you enjoy re-building civilization for a devistated people. If all you want is a fat wallet, do as the parent suggested or become a .com CEO, or similar. It's not only safer, it's easier.

    4. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by mandolin · · Score: 4, Funny
      I would prefer the void of death to the destroyed life of jail

      I apologize in advance, but it's fairly obvious you haven't thought this through.

      A friend of mine got off parole awhile back for selling weed; he now has a life, a steady girlfriend and a house. For a more popular example, google "Tim.Allen drugs" (even though I think he's a schmuck).

      Jail is just a stumbling block. Death, OTOH, is permanent.

      Of course, I suppose you could get unlucky/stupid and die in jail, negating my point.

    5. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by Zen+Punk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Political prisoners/hostages are not always simply killed right away. Many are held in, uh, shall we say less than comfortable conditions before finally being set free or killed. John Mccain was held in Vietnam for 9 years. American hostages in Iran were held for what, three years(correct if wrong, this top of head)? Also, what if these "terrorists" decide not to just kill you, but maim you or mutilate you. Maybe then they'll release you, maybe not. Maybe your new nickname will be "lefty," maybe it will be "one-eyed Willy." If you are sent to jail, then you at least have a release date or the possibility of parole. You do in fact have a chance at a normal life, with all the limbs/organs you went in with! If you are being held as a hostage/captive by rogues, you do not know if you will die tomorrow or life years in a filthy hole. You have no idea the kind of terror that may be waiting for you. In jail, everything operates according to legal precedent. You have a sentence, a release date(if applicable), parole, time off for good behavior. You have rights and expectations as a prisoner. If you are to be executed, you will be notified and killed in a humane fashion. You have none of this as a hostage in a hostile situation like that of Nick Berg. Does that answer why going to jail might be preferable to being captured by terrorists?

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    6. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      I wasn't serious, of course. You think I'm that crazy, to take such a risk if there are safer alternatives? I was arguing a point for the sake of arguing.

      And yes, I would prefer to be a prisoner in an American jail than a prisoner anywhere else (well, except maybe the Vatican's or something). However, with an expectation of quick death, I would rather be captured and killed for no fault of mine than be given a life after torment and a dark stain on my conscience.

      And, morally, I feel more comfortable suffering at the hands of evil people for their fault than suffering at the hands of good people for my fault.

    7. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Me, a callous, angst-ridden loser? Wow. Maybe you ought to meet me. I'm the person who cannot be en-angst-ed even if there is sufficient reason. A hyper, overhappy loser might describe me, though.

      I argued that point for the sake of philosophical argument, because the point needed to be argued, not because I personally believe in it. I'm not that crazy. Re: the question: no, I do not believe the risk is worth the money.

      And I said nothing about family. Paul Johnson is probably perfectly happy right now. His family isn't.

      You're a disgrace to humanity.

      I plead no contest.

    8. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by jedrek · · Score: 1

      Yeah... except the chance of you getting hit as a drug dealer out on the street vs the chance of you getting killed doing work in iraq is very, very high. I've read two stories about contractors being kidnapped and killed - scan any big city paper and read about how many drug-violence related deaths there are in a week.

    9. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by TaoJones · · Score: 1
      Seriously. Mods - hear me out before hitting "troll."

      I'm listening...
      Stand on the street and sell weed. You would make a lot of money. Yes, it's true that if things go badly you end up in jail. But if things go badly in Iraq, you end up dead.

      Try your idea in any midsized town in the US and see how long it takes for the local street power structure (Crips, Bloods, Latin Kings, local gangs, etc) to pop a cap in your ass and take your weed and your money. You wouldn't last 30 minutes. Go back to playing Dope Wars...
      --
      "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
    10. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by ldspartan · · Score: 1

      wait... what?

      I've read two stories about contractors being kidnapped and killed - scan any big city paper and read about how many drug-violence related deaths there are in a week.

      So you're saying that the number of times that a specific act appears in the 'news' media is indicative of the overall rate of occurence of that act?

      Based on that "logic," everyone in the US has had sex with Bill Clinton. Twice.

    11. Re:You'd be better off becoming a drug dealer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only saying you'd rather be in an American prisoner because you're American (and therefore understandably your first impulse).

      I am not an American but have heard pretty bad stories about your prisons. I am originally from the UK and have been fortunate enough to sample quite a few European prisons in addition to one in my homeland. (This was all several years ago - I'm a right stand up guy now.)

      From my experience, Euro prisons, especially Sweden and Norway, are absolute jokes... easier than a corporate retreat (not that I've ever been on one...) The Parisian jail I was in was bad, dirty and crowded, but very well supervised and safe. The UK prison was the worst of them all. Exactly what one would expect a prison to be from the movies, except without the sodomy and torture, just sitting in cells and playing pool during rec.

      But when I watched OZ, fuck, I could easily imagine what would happen if all the bad-asses I've sat with were in one prison then that's what it'd be like. And when I hear about the super violent jails you have like LA County, I think of OZ because I've never seen anything near that bad.

      So what was it I used to do? Travel, and support myself in various ways whilst doing so, usually dealing green and brown. Never spent long in the 'clink' either, just a couple of months at most, and a final stretch of 6mths that encouraged me to return home and settle for a rabbit job.

      Speaking of which, I should get back to it if I want to leave on time.

  3. Not worth it by blaberski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't go. When you are in the military at least you have a gun and can shoot back. As a contractor, your kind of on your own.

    1. Re:Not worth it by KrispyKringle · · Score: 2, Interesting
      As a contractor, you also aren't required to go to the front lines and shoot people (although to be fair, there seems to be multiple uses of the word contracter; the one being this use, the other being people such as the CIA civilian ``contractor'' being charged for beating an Iraqi civilian to death).

    2. Re:Not worth it by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please point out where the front lines are in the Iraq War.

    3. Re:Not worth it by unitron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For Paul Johnson the front lines stretched across the border into Saudia Arabia. Look for them to keep spreading.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:Not worth it by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I am aware of that, it's one reason that I am highly upset about the complete and total lack of border security in the USA. If farm workers can cross the border, so can those that care man portable missles.

    5. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All around you. The war in iraq is still in guerrilla stage and you could get shot from any direction. No matter if you're carrying gun or not. To them, it's enough to kill you if you look foreign.

    6. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Easy. The al-Anbar province, and what you in America know as the "Sunni Triangle". This is an area where you're likely to be kidnapped based on the color of your skin, and the dress you wear. (There's also a danger of kidnapping just because you look rich--nothing political, just for money.) Generally, the Turkomen and Kurdish areas are safe, as are places controlled by Falah al-Naqib. (Perhaps you recognize the name--he's the Interior minister.)

      Was your question about the "front lines" serious, or some sort of display of ignorance?

    7. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other ways to defend yourself. I would not go, nor would i suggest anyone else go, with out first completing a coarse in Krav Maga / Haganah (Such as fight2survive.com) or something similar, even if you will be allowed to carry a firearm of edged weapon. Haganah covers armed and unarmed combat, dealing with armed attackers (knives and guns) when you are unarmed, etc...

      Something intended for sparing competitions like WTF Olympic Taekwondo (www.wtf.org) is far less than ideal for real world combat / street fighting. Krav Maga on the other hand, doesn't work very well for sparing, but for real world encounters, it is very effective, and practical...

    8. Re:Not worth it by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Now that was a high int response. Please try harder and use less profanity.

      Thanks!

    9. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on. I'm amazed at the complete ignorance people in the U.S. have about Iraq. They think it's all car bombs and angry crowds. Unless you're trying to make a political comment about the war, that image is simply not Iraq. Come over here for a while, and you'll see. Now, don't go wandering around any old part of the kazbah. Just like in New York, you can get into a bad neighborhood and get yourself killed. But I found that true of Paris, New York and even Tokyo! And driving a supply truck is dangerous, because there are small groups of people that try to blow them up to score political points. (They do have convoys and overhead predators to help now, however, so it's not as bad.)

    10. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha jew karate

    11. Re:Not worth it by Asmodean451 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not true. An acquaintance of mine is a contractor there and he blogs it on his LJ. 1. He always carries a gun. 2. His company provides mercs for extra protection.

      Its not for everyone, by far, I wouldn't do it either, but if you want to, its not a total death warrant. The aforementioned acquaintance has been there for a year now, with his gf who is also doing contractor work.

    12. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the unemployed Americans will pick tomatoes and mop floors?

    13. Re:Not worth it by NitsujTPU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude, civilian contractors get hazardous duty pay for going places like that. They go straight up to the front lines just like a soldier would in many cases. It is, to be blunt, dangerous work, and you should expect to be spied on and be prepared to be shot at.

      More directly to the original story. There are easier ways to make a lot of money than that. You life, for the entirety of your stay in the middle east, is likely to suck. Get 2 jobs and you'll be happier, and get to survive.

    14. Re:Not worth it by natebow · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not all that bad, its a lot of territory, the media focuses on the glaring horror stories. I 've been on 2 tours as a contractor in direct support of ground forces, and have been just about everywhere in the theater, Iraq and Afghanistan. My first tour was during the initial ground war, and I travelled with the troops all the way to Tikrit, 2nd tour I was based out of kuwait and travelled as required, to Falluga, Baghdad, and Afghanistan. I would definately recommend the Kuwait tour. Good network and I was able to do most work over the net.

    15. Re:Not worth it by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      The salary numbers being tossed around have caught my eye (120k+ - tax free?!?) but how hard is it to procure a sidearm, and carry it legally where you will be working? I'd hate to be armed well enough to take on abductors, only to get hauled off by the local gendarmes for packing heat. Do you get waivers if you want to order body armor from a company that usually sells only to military and law enforcement (ie, US Cavalry). Who do you talk to to get job leads?

    16. Re:Not worth it by fenix+down · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh, yeah, like you can survive here legally just mopping floors and picking tomatoes.

    17. Re:Not worth it by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of companies that sell body armor to civilians. Second Chance is one such.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    18. Re:Not worth it by das3cr · · Score: 1

      Sure. Syria on the west and Iran on the East. Rod Don't just stand there and shout it -- do something about it. - Depeche Mode

      --
      Hurricane Island Outward Bound
      OB
    19. Re:Not worth it by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Jew karate indeed. That shit will get you killed so bad. Every time I hear somebody say Krav Maga I always think of those retards who got their ass shot at a bank robbery trying to take the guy's gun. Seriously, that the videos they try and sell you include a "bar fight" example should tell you all you need to know about them. Martial arts are just mediocre substitues for fight experience mixed with pseudo-mystical BS to try and scare people off before the fight starts. That's all. All your Krav Maga shit is going to say to Mr. Al Qaeda Kidnapper is that you've read Cryptonomicon way to many times, and possibly that you're an unloved, lonely nerd who, as such, would probably make a poor hostage.

    20. Re:Not worth it by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      It's called supply and demand. The wages will have to go up, but if they go up enough there will be workers to fill those jobs.

    21. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm amazed at the complete ignorance people in the U.S. have about Iraq.

      Please. Cut the hyperbole. People the world over are ignorant of places they've never been.

      Just like in New York, you can get into a bad neighborhood and get yourself killed. But I found that true of Paris, New York (again?) and even... ...Tokyo!

      Whoops- you slipped up. You've never left the country.

    22. Re:Not worth it by Hugo+D.+Zappo · · Score: 0

      Survive, yes.
      Have the latest toys and internet access? No!

      It all depends on where your priorities are. You would be amazed at how well you can live on away from the city, and you can live even better on the underground economy.

      Mopping floors pays $12/hr, the local potato farms pay $10/hour and feed you lunch, and the local cable company help desk starts at $8. The janitorial services do not care what you wear at night, or if they do, they supply uniforms. If you just want day labor, cash each night you only have to be willing to do manual labor.

      All those people coming across the fence are not MCSEs!

    23. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to ask the Ask Slashdot poster something... Do you ever watch the news?! Do you want to be taken hostage and then beheaded like two others have already? Or blown up in a convoy? Or attacked in a convoy and then kidnapped while everyone else with you dies, taken to a secret location and have your beheading videotaped and have photographs with your sawed-off head napping on your back with a knife jabbed in your forehead sent all over the internet?

    24. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you ever watch the news!? You could have your vehicle carjacked, get stuffed in the trunk, raped, and/or murdered in a wooded area outside YOUR TOWN RIGHT NOW! Do people stop working in Chicago or NYC because more Americans were killed there every year than those that were killed in Iraq. It just doesn't make national/world news.

    25. Re:Not worth it by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Uh I think the Neanderthan that posted the grandparent was trying to say that only people that come here illegially will do those jobs. If their here illegally they have to work here illegally. Now as someone else said, teenagers used to work those jobs and got their foot in the door. They still live off their parents and use their income purely for non essential purposes.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    26. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not body armor that would stop the type of rounds you would be facing.

    27. Re:Not worth it by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Troll

      Please don't use such big words, this dumbass American can not understand you.

    28. Re:Not worth it by eth00 · · Score: 1

      True but as a civilian in iraq you can carry a weapon. In fact many of the firms that are inside of Iraq have to provide thier OWN security! There was a story awhile back about 8 guys killing 200 attackers and suffering no casualties. They were all retired military working for a contracting company.

      Now latest case was in Saudi which really starts to blend the lines of where the war really is.

      I would say it is up to you if you want the risk. This is just like the wild west in so many ways. You can go and make a profit but you might turn up dead. You have to weigh out all of the options and see if it is worth it...

      As for me IF I went, which I don't personally think it would be worth it right now, I know that I would be toting my assault rifle with a pistol for backup...

    29. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guy I used to go to college with just got back from a tour in Iraq. He's going back as a merc for a company doing some of the rebuilding. His salary? $250k/yr. I believe that the first 85k or so is tax free.

    30. Re:Not worth it by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is an area where you're likely to be kidnapped based on...

      Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.

      There's no place in Iraq where you're likely to be kidnapped. There are places where the possibility is higher than others, but nowhere is it likely.

      Of course, if you're the one snatched, tortured, and beheaded, I guess it really doesn't matter what the odds were.

      And as for the crap about the "front lines." Wake up, you moron! (Whichever moron posted the remark, I mean.) There are no more front lines. Iraq is incredibly peaceful and incredibly secure when you consider what it's been through recently. Hell, there are many places in the United States that are less safe, in terms of per capita violent crime, than most of Iraq. I'd feel safer wandering the streets of Basra or Baghdad or Mosul at night than I would walking to or from the Metro stop in southeast D.C.

      --

      I write in my journal
    31. Re:Not worth it by maxpublic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except that in D.C., I have zero chance of being kidnapped, tortured, and then beheaded in a slow and gruesome fashion while my death it being taped for the entertainment of millions world-wide.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    32. Re:Not worth it by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am aware of that, it's one reason that I am highly upset about the complete and total lack of border security in the USA.

      hummmm. The lessons of USSR are totally lost. They cracked down all their citizens and border. Yet, it was totally porus. Same here. Even if we spent 1/4 of our budget on guarding borders, ppl, weapons and drugs would still come in.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    33. Re:Not worth it by paganizer · · Score: 1

      zero chance?
      lets just says it's highly unlikely.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    34. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how that is a slip up or how you can conclude he's never left the country...

    35. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You can tell this idiot is neither an Iraqi nor has he ever been in Iraq.

      EVERY Iraqi I've seen quoted is concerned about being kidnapped or killed - either by trigger-happy US troops or thieves or kidnappers or the insurgents.

      Comparing it to some of the tougher areas of some of the US cities is just ridiculous. A white guy could walk through Harlem or East L.A. and be more likely to make it than he would in Sadr City.

      Granted, most Iraqis will still treat a Westerner well whereas most ghetto blacks might not - but most ghetto blacks won't shoot you because there ARE cops in this country - that isn't the case in Iraq. If an insurgent spots you, you are in trouble.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    36. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      True. AK rounds need Threat Level III or higher armor which is a PITA to wear in that heat.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    37. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      The 600-800 murders in Chicago are probably mostly drug dealers and domestic violence cases with a smattering of serial killers.

      In other words, unless you are participating in illegal endeavors or married the wrong person, you're not likely to get killed in Chicago or anywhere else in the US.

      This is not the case in Iraq where any Westerner stands out like a sore thumb and is considered a legitimate target by the insurgents - especially if he is a US contractor.

      The situations are totally different even if the numbers seem the same.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    38. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      8 guys killed 200 attackers?

      Horseshit...

      Unless of course the "attackers" were unarmed...ie, Iraqi civilians...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    39. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only tax free up to $85k..anything beyond that is taxable.

    40. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, unless the attackers were really badly trained and led and the defenders were really well trained and led.

      The incident happened in Najaf on 5 April, and the contractors were all ex-Special Forces. (Former SEALs, Rangers, Green Berets.) The attackers were apparently part of Muqtada al-Sadr's Madhi Army, which is not terribly well led, organized, or trained: they just have large numbers.

      It's covered in this article. (Washington Post, may require soul-sucking registration)

      Small, well-trained forces can (and do) defeat much larger, untrained forces. You may wish to read up on Rorke's Drift. (If you want an entertianing, and mostly historically accurate movie on the subject, rent Zulu.

      Of course, the four Blackwater contractors murdered and strung up in Fallujah were also all ex-Special Forces. But they got caught by surprise while on the move. The guys in Najaf were in the CPA headquarters there, knew all the approaches, had defenses to fall back on, and were well resupplied, against guys whose tactics were human wave. Eventually, the defenders would have been overwhelmed if it was just them, but from the article, they got reinforced.

    41. Re:Not worth it by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Not so sure about that. A vague relative of mine who lived in DC was snatched, raped and subsequently murdered on the way home from work, so there is clearly a non-zero chance of kidnap and torture, though not death by beheading I grant you. I don't know whether anybody taped the event, so I will grant you that one too, at least provisionally.

      However, I can't honestly say that the mode of death prevalent in DC actually sounds particularly enjoyable to me either, so I personally take two lessons from it:
      1) don't move to DC.
      2) don't move to Iraq.

    42. Re: Not worth it by dbIII · · Score: 1
      As a contractor, your kind of on your own.
      While declaring the war over was expedient, the reality is proving to be different. Sending unprotected civilians allied with you into a war zone just provides the combatants on the other side with plenty of soft targets. This is the sort of thing a military force should be used for - getting stuff done in war zones - you send your specialists in with protection.
    43. Re:Not worth it by Alric · · Score: 1

      Uhh, yeah that's important, because you are really going to care about that tape when you're DEAD.

      Yes, it would suck for your loved ones, but at least they would know your circumstance.

      In D.C., you might get jumped, slowly beaten to death and then hidden from the authorities. Your loved ones might never know if you purposefully left or were abducted, if you're alive or dead. That sounds equally shitty.

      Also, I don't know what types of heinous torture the abductors inflict on their victims, but beheading has always been considered a merciful death, if done correctly. You die quickly, with no painful lingering. It's supposed to be much better than being disembowelled, burned, or flogged.

      And your loved ones probably get a nice chunk of change from the company that sent you over there.

      The point is that it is ridiculous to compare different generalizations about death.

    44. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Was your question about the "front lines" serious, or some sort of display of ignorance?

      Someone's safety may be at stake here; so rein in that ego.

      I would concur that so-called "lines" do indeed seem very blurry in this mess. This "Sunni triangle" you refer to is primarily a linguistic construct, with only a distant basis in geography. It's not as if you can actually draw such a triangle on a map with the intention of using it as a guide for safety on the ground!

      Areas of influence are very fluid, and difficult to identify, especially in the ethnically-diverse urban environments where such technical contracts would be most likely found. Extremists are filtering in from other countries to wreak havoc.

      Being armed or having guards may not be enough. If you are white, affluent, foreign, non-Muslim, working for the occupation or worst yet all of the above, you become a target. To get comfortable and establish a routine is to risk making oneself an easy target. You can't even trust your cab driver.

      IMHO there are many ways to see the world and make money which would be far safer.

    45. Re:Not worth it by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1
      I'd like to add that there are legitimate reasons for doing this:

      • This appeals to your adventurous side
      • You honestly want to help these countries
      • ...other personal reasons
    46. Re:Not worth it by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Well... you might run into a fetishist or psychopath.

    47. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The salary numbers being tossed around have caught my eye (120k+ - tax free?!?) but how hard is it to procure a sidearm, and carry it legally where you will be working?

      Firstly a sidearm won't cut it. You're in the land of AK-47 and AK-74, and even if you're packing a Dirty Harry special you're going to die. So upgrade that to an assault rifle. A friend of mine was working a contract in Bosnia and he was packing an M-16.

      Secondly even with so-called Mercs in tow if they come after you, you will NOT have the element of surprise and you WILL be outnumbered. Witness the four contractors in the car who were killed earlier this year.

      And the horseshit about body armor? Yeah, that's fine if you're in a company size formation and your mates can locate and eliminate the people who are shooting at you. In a small group (which is what the experienced folks target) you'll live through the first few rounds until they knock you on your ass, or tag you in the head, or even fire an RPG your way. If you're lucky you won't live through it.

      I'm not trying to sound overly critical, but in my opinion (and of course you may feel otherwise) it is NOT worth it. In additon, when I was on active duty I really didn't trust contractors; they were outsiders. Of course we'd have taken care of them push comes to shove, but I'd rather have full military-infrastructure backup. When's the last time you've heard of a contractor (excepting those working for the CIA) call in a gunship strike?

    48. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not all that bad, its a lot of territory, the media focuses on the glaring horror stories."

      Exactly. I bet you'd be afraid to live in the U.S. too if you were in Europe and EVERYTIME there was a murder anywhere in the U.S. it made national news.

    49. Re:Not worth it by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      At least the contractors get hella more pay than the grunt.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    50. Re:Not worth it by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      EVERY Iraqi I've seen quoted...

      There are about 25 million people in Iraq. How many of them have you "seen quoted?"

      You're making the classic mistake: you're assuming that what you see on the news is representative. By definition, it's not. If it were representative, it wouldn't be news. News is the exceptional or the unusual.

      A white guy could walk through Harlem or East L.A. and be more likely to make it than he would in Sadr City.

      See, here's the thing: you just made that up. You have absolutely no knowledge of what you're talking about. You just made it up.

      Shame on you.

      but most ghetto blacks won't shoot you because there ARE cops in this country - that isn't the case in Iraq

      No? Wait 'til I tell that to the 260,000-strong Iraqi police force.

      --

      I write in my journal
    51. Re:Not worth it by mike_the_kid · · Score: 1
      but most ghetto blacks won't shoot you because there ARE cops in this country


      Wake up you silly little racist. Most ghetto blacks won't shoot you because THEY AREN'T MURDERERS.

      I guess maybe you've listened to too much NWA and other silly stuff. Yes, violence happens. Yes, people get killed, robbed, and beaten. But its the exception. If you want to live in fear, its your choice, but it isn't the decision I make. But then, many people would rather let the media or the government make their decisions for them.

      Personally, I've dealt with lots of different people, and I can tell you that there are many poor people (or ghetto blacks if you must) that I would rather be in the care of then many cops out there.

      Turn off your TV. Unlock your front door, walk outside, breathe in some fresh air, and talk to your neighbors. They might scare you at first, but there's a good chance they're more like you than you realize.
      --
      Troll Like a Champion Today
    52. Re:Not worth it by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Everybody has a sidearm. In Afganistan the local populace can carry around an AK-47 type rifle. As long as they don't do anything threating with it they will be fine. You can also carry around whatever you want as long as it is not an anti-tank or crew-served weapon. Where you will run into issues is the compound you are living on. Depending on who is running the compound you may have issues carrying the weapon around.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    53. Re:Not worth it by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      Please point out where the front lines are in the Iraq War.

      I don't think that question can be answered until after November 2nd.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    54. Re:Not worth it by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      most Iraqis will still treat a Westerner well whereas most ghetto blacks might not

      Admit it. You've never actually met any Iraqis, have you? Or any black people, for that matter?

    55. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You can't read English, can you?

      I said "every Iraqi I've seen quoted". By definition that does not include 25 million Iraqis. It means exactly what it says.

      What I see on the news are quotes from average Iraqis who are NOT news and they are saying they are all concerned about their security. What part of that can't you comprehend?

      The "26,000 strong Iraqi police" are regarded by the average Iraqi as either criminal thugs or members of the insurgency. The ones that aren't are afraid for their lives because they are associating with the US troops. And comparing that tiny number to the number of cops in the US is pathetic not to mention the superior communications technology the US cops have which can allow them to respond quickly (not that they do, of course) to criminal acts.

      In other words, you're an idiot.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    56. Re:Not worth it by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      What I see on the news are quotes from average Iraqis who are NOT news and they are saying they are all concerned about their security.

      You're wrong.

      The "26,000 strong Iraqi police" are regarded by the average Iraqi as either criminal thugs or members of the insurgency.

      Again, that's not true.

      You know what amazes me? That you, an idiot who's never been within seven thousand miles of Iraq, purport to know what "the average Iraqi" thinks.

      That amazes me.

      Also, it's not 26,000. It's 260,000. You're off by a factor of 10. That's one Iraqi policeman for every 100 citizens.

      Please stop speaking about a subject on which you are neither informed nor educated. Seriously: please stop.

      --

      I write in my journal
    57. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You're entirely overreacting to my comment.

      I am perfectly well aware that most ghetto blacks are not murderers. I was referring to those who do carry guns and don't like whites, obviously.

      And I spent eight years in Federal prison with those guys, okay? So I know CONSIDERABLY more about them than you do - and I know cops (at least, correctional officers) better than you, too, and they're assholes as well, you're right about that.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    58. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      I spent eight years in Federal prison with ghetto blacks. I got along with a lot of them and didn't with others.

      How many do you know?

      Admit it. You're a /.'er nerd who has never met any blacks. And you've never read any quotes from Iraqis for the last year, either.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    59. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You're the ignorant one.

      I've been following detailed accounts of the situation in Iraq since the war started.

      You've been listening to Fox News, that's obvious.

      Here's a quote from an article last fall:

      Now, in an effort to bolster the 37,000 member Iraqi police force, Bernard Kerik has arranged to utilize an abandoned Soviet military base in Hungary as a training center. He plans to train an additional 28,000 policemen over the next 18 months, bringing the number of Iraqi police to 65,000, which he judges should be enough to police the entire country.

      Here's another quote from an article here:

      All those months Rumsfeld was cooking the books. In late March the Pentagon released a chart summarizing the numbers of Iraqi security force troops. It tells a different story from the one peddled by Rumsfeld. The summary notes that 75,844 Iraqis were on the payroll as police officers, but only 2,865 were fully qualified and on duty. Another 13,286 were deemed "partially qualified" and supposedly on duty, while 3,245 were in training. Three-fourths of those on the police payroll had received no training. Six months earlier Rumsfeld had declared that 55,000 police had been trained. Not even close. (Despite the small size of the new Iraqi police force, it has been a primary target of the insurgents, who recently mounted attacks on police stations in Basra that claimed the lives of dozens of civilians. And Iraqi police elsewhere have been killed in assaults.)

      The Pentagon summary also shows that Rumsfeld had been stretching the truth about other security forces. It notes that the new Iraqi Border Police needed 8,835 officers, but this force had not one fully trained officer on duty. It did have 8,601 partially qualified police and 179 in training. The Department of Border Enforcement required 16,892 troops; it had 9,873 partially qualified troops, no fully qualified people and none in training. Of the 40,000 troops needed for the Iraqi Armed Forces, only 3,249 had been fully trained and deployed. A mere 2,400 were in training. The Pentagon summary does note that the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps had 34,683 members who were receiving on-the-job training. (A Civil Defense Corps group in Falluja vanished during recent fighting there.) And it reports that the security service designed to protect government facilities and Iraqi infrastructure had a force of 73,992.

      All told, the Pentagon summary maintains, there were 208,821 Iraqis in the various security services. But counting only those fully trained and on duty, the total was 114,789. And 95 percent of that force comprised security guards and civil defense members -- not the front-line forces. Add up the active and fully trained Iraqi police, border personnel and military forces, and the number of Iraq security troops is 6,114. Throw in those partially trained, and the total goes up to 37,874. The Iraqi security forces hardly could boast over 200,000 troops "providing security," as Rumsfeld claimed in March.

      In other words, you're an idiot.

      Try listening to somebody other than Rush for a change.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    60. Re:Not worth it by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 0

      I've been following detailed accounts of the situation in Iraq since the war started.

      And yet you get basic things like names and numbers wrong. How do you explain that?

      Now, in an effort to bolster the 37,000 member Iraqi police force...

      Christ, how old is that quote? The number has been a steady 260,000 for nearly two months now.

      Here's the deal: you're wrong. That's nothing to be ashamed of; it happens to everybody sooner or later. But the problem is that you know you're wrong, and yet you persist in believing things that are no longer true, or that were never true. And, as if that weren't enough, you repeat these things. You're spreading lies.

      Let me repeat that: you are spreading lies.

      Now shut the fuck up you fucking liar. I've had it up to here with your amateurish attempts to deceive.

      Just shut the fuck up.

      --

      I write in my journal
    61. Re:Not worth it by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      That last guy didn't actually die from gunshot wounds, IIRC.
      A bullet proof vest doesn't protect from head lopper-offers.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    62. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Fuck you, homes.

      I clobbered your bullshit estimate with the Pentagon's own facts, and you can't handle it.

      Tough shit, fool.

      The shit has yet to really hit the fan in Iraq. That will come when Sistani finally realizes the so-called "government" is nothing but a bunch of Quislings and his call for all traces of the occupation to be erased is ignored. Then he issues his fatwa and the US gets their ass kicked worse than they're getting it now.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    63. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Absolutely true.

      They don't even protect from knives unless you've got ceramic or steel plates in them, either.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    64. Re:Not worth it by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Admit it? Shit, when did I ever deny being a "/.'er nerd"? And I've known plenty of dark-skinned folks in my life, some who grew up in pretty bad environments, others who didn't. Not that this is particularly relevant.

      The point that I was trying to make is that you're making yourself out to be an authority on subjects of which you have no first-hand knowledge, only published news reports. (So I guess I was half right on that one...) Reporters always distort reality, even under the best circumstances - sometimes the distortion is only due to a choice of which piece of information is worth reporting. And it's not really your statements I was objecting to, just your rude attitude and your absolute conviction that you're right.

      Another thing... May I suggest that you're allowing your personal experiences to "color" your judgement? Out of all the black people in the Bronx (for example) only some are full-time violent outlaws. And only some of those are stupid or unlucky enough to get caught and convicted. Those are the ones that you got to party with for eight years. Not exactly a representative sample.

    65. Re:Not worth it by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      You must be around 16 or 17 years old...

    66. Re:Not worth it by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Please point out where the front lines are in the Iraq War.

      Anywhere there's oil that isn't under the control of America.

    67. Re:Not worth it by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Like THIS news report?

      Post reporter dies in hail of bullets.
      By: DANIEL WILLIAMS on: 20.06.2004 [18:02 ] (133 reads)

      The car in which Polish TV reporter Waldemar Milewicz and Algerian correspondent Mounir Bouamrane were killed in a downtown Baghdad ambush last month serves as a stark reminder of how completely the conflict between U.S.-led forces and violent opponents of the occupation is closing in on all foreign civilians working in Iraq.

      Gunmen hunt down reporter on Iraq highway by DANIEL WILLIAMS SPECIAL TO THE STAR

      BAGHDAD?I guess I've been working for newspapers too long, but when I looked into the face of my would-be killer as he shot bursts of AK-47 fire into my SUV on the superhighway from Falluja to Baghdad, the first thing that came to mind was the likely headline in the next day's paper: Post reporter dies in hail of bullets.

      It had already been a harrowing trip through Falluja, the heart of rebellion, revenge and bloodshed in the so-called Sunni Triangle of Iraq.

      Along with my driver, Falah, we had woven our way through the city to find ourselves blocked at every exit by masked insurgents who had won free rein after the withdrawal of U.S. Marines in May.

      We were worried because the rebels kidnap foreigners and sometimes kill them. This was the town where, in April, ambushers killed and mutilated four American contractors and hung two of the burned bodies from a bridge over the Euphrates River.

      I can't print the full name of my driver because mere association with a foreign organization like the Washington Post can mean death. Someone could find him, even in big Baghdad.

      When we made it to the highway that leads from Falluja back to the capital, we were relieved.

      "Hamdulillah," Falah said as he picked up speed past the Falluja interchange: "Thanks be to God."

      "Hamdulillah," I responded. It's one of the key Arabic phrases one should know in Iraq. But God was not exactly finished with us. Out of nowhere, a car painted in the characteristic orange and white of Iraq's taxis pulled up close behind us. I heard a thud, something like the sound of a rubber sledgehammer or mud hitting a wall. I looked back and saw a spider-web pattern on the bulletproof rear window. And then more thuds.

      "Oh," I said.

      Falah was more precise. "They're shooting," he said and sped up from his already-fast 145 km/h.

      The point of this or almost any story from Iraq these days is how completely the conflict between the United States and the violent opponents of U.S. occupation is closing in on anyone who lives here.

      For a long time, rebel targets have included Iraqis who work for the foreigners, who work in government and even who labour for Iraqis in business or government. For the past few months, Americans and other foreigners working in Iraq have also been victims of ambush.

      There is virtually no discrimination, and the narcotic sense of immunity that gave reporters the notion they could go into a war zone, talk to people and get back safely has been shattered.

      The brazenness and frequency of all kinds of insurgent assaults ? from car bombings and mortar attacks to roadside bombs hidden under trash, in goat carcasses, in date palm logs, inside barrels or under asphalt ? have made reporters more and more likely to actually witness rather than just hear about an act of mayhem.

      Recently, I was interviewing a sociologist about Shiite Muslim society at his office on the banks of the Tigris River.

      We heard a blast, looked out the window and spied three slim figures in masks firing mortars. They casually dismantled the launcher, put it in the back of an Opel station wagon and drove away.

      Of course, Iraqis and foreigners alike must be careful to steer clear of U.S. convoys on the road for fear that an ambush might stimulate the heavy American guns to fire or a roadside bomb might go off late and hit civilians.

      I have covered conflicts in Palestine, Lebanon, El Salvador, Nicarag

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  4. Where are these jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd go. How do I sign up? Monster doesn't really carry that kind of stuff, and some basic Google searches didn't turn up much. Do I email Halliburton or something?

    1. Re:Where are these jobs? by gr8fulnded · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a gov't contractor (fully cleared, TS/SCI, polys, ect.), I can get these offers. Most of the companies that have this kind of stuff are the big gov't contractors such as Lockheed Martin, CSC, Halliburton, Titan, General Dynamics, Northrup Grumman (sp), and on and on. Try their websites, you may find something there.

    2. Re:Where are these jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the cpa-iraq website.

    3. Re:Where are these jobs? by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's one place you can look, the FEDZ official job site, USAJOBS (OPM = US Office of Personnel Management). You can input a resume, search for jobs, &/or set up search agents. One program relating to this topic is SOFIA (Support Our Friends in Iraq and Afghanistan.)

    4. Re:Where are these jobs? by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      just check out gov't contractor websites for job listings - SAIC, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, CACI, Veridian, Boeing, Raytheon. Heck, http://www.fas.org/man/company/top.htm
      that should be a veritable "who's who" of companies that may have a job you're looking for.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    5. Re:Where are these jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go. How do I sign up? Monster doesn't really carry that kind of stuff, and some basic Google searches didn't turn up much. Do I email Halliburton or something?

      Go to www.killmenow.com

  5. Are you joking? by SinaSa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have to ask yourself the (deliberatley skewed left by me) question "Is the lure of money so great on me that I would leave my country to work somewhere where they are kidnapping people exactly like me?

    This isn't an opportunity. You aren't "helping shape a newborn government" or whatever. Even if you're Christian, Iraq is the oldest place on earth. If you need the money, do it. Otherwise, don't.

    --
    --
    The last digit of pi is four.
    1. Re:Are you joking? by KrispyKringle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some (not I) would say you're doing your part to help rebuild. I find it much more likely you're doing your part to help line a government contractor's wallet (the likes of Halliburton).

    2. Re:Are you joking? by thrillseeker · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I find it much more likely you're doing your part to help line a government contractor's wallet (the likes of Halliburton).

      Yeah, how dare the people that work for the likes of Halliburton expect to actually get paid for risking their lives to try to establish a decent way of life for Iraqis - they should be willing to give up their lives and do it for free, nay, why even paying to be there, just like I'm sure you with all your insight into world affairs certainly are ... oh wait ...

    3. Re:Are you joking? by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how dare the people that work for the likes of Halliburton expect to actually get paid for risking their lives to try to establish a decent way of life for Iraqi..

      Do you even know what 'carpet-bagging' means?

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    4. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you don't want to get the governments involved, travel to Iraq on your own and volunteer. Just walk in to offices, hospitals, schools, or wherever you think you might be needed with your kilometers of cables and pallets of gear.

      It can be done. Or did you forget that's what was done by the first fellow who was beheaded?

    5. Re:Are you joking? by gruhnj · · Score: 1

      Why rebuild them at all right now? Security over ther sucks right now. The average Iraqi wants us to leave. Going over and rebuilding the conutry is all well and good in intnet, but when there are truck bombs and beheadings and such in theather, WTF difference does it make? Its bad enough that the new Iraqi government has declared they may resort to Martial Law. Why go and rebuild a place until they can calm down enough to actually use it? Im all for giving them goodwill, they need it, but the insurgents must be conquered first. Right now, if you build it, it will just get torn down.

      If we get security under control, we can start to make some progress on the rebuilding part. Even better, once security comes in, we wont be alone in building. We can lead them to water all we want, but right now they wont drink.

      SPC Gruhn
      TNOSC-K, SMB
      1st Signal BDE
      Keyboard Infanrty since 2002

    6. Re:Are you joking? by TheUglyAmerican · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It is so stupid to work for a company and expect your company to be profitable as a result. So what non-profit do you work for?

      --
      "Written on the pages is the answer to the never ending story..."
    7. Re:Are you joking? by operagost · · Score: 1
      Do you really think Iraq has the manpower and know-how to repair an oil pipeline that was destroyed by terrorists in TWO days? That's what happened. It wasn't Iraqis working alone.

      It's not as if there's many unemployed able-bodies Iraqis right now. The ones that aren't fucktards killing their own people are busy fixing all the things that went neglected under Saddam's regime. Oh, like power plants - and water treatment - and schools!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Are you joking? by dilweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Even if you're Christian, Iraq is the oldest place on earth." Actually, I think the Earth is the same age all over. But that's just me.

    9. Re:Are you joking? by fenix+down · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Do you really think Iraq has the manpower and know-how to repair an oil pipeline that was destroyed by terrorists in TWO days?

      Um, yes? They did pretty fine pumping their billions of barrels of oil for the past 70, 80 years, and repairing the damage after countless wars. I don't see why they'd start sucking now. They produce a fuck of a lot more oil than we do, that's for sure, and they've had a hell of a lot more practice than whatever 3rd-string dorks Halliburton shipped over. The only reason we bring in Halliburton is they import Greek and Russian muscle who don't speak Arabic and are, frankly, just too dumb to take bribes to sabotage things. It's not like they're any good at this stuff, the army gets bids from the Iraqi engineering firms who built the stuff in the first place, to have it fixed in 1/4 the time and at 1/10th the price, it's just that we don't trust them to do it.

    10. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Iraq is 6001 years old. The rest of the earth is only 6000 years old.

    11. Re:Are you joking? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I do: \Car"pet*bag`ger\, n. An adventurer; -- a term of contempt for a Northern man seeking private gain or political advancement in the southern part of the United States after the Civil War (1865)

      So what you're saying is that if you are seeking private gain you cannot also be doing good? The two are not mutually exclusive.

      Maybe you should go look up arrogant.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you figure that Dick Cheney et al are "risking their [own] lives"? If only that were the case...

    13. Re:Are you joking? by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should go look up arrogant.

      Learn grammar, and then have another go, if you think you're hard enough.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    14. Re:Are you joking? by rkrabath · · Score: 1

      Another part of it is that if we let halliburton do it, they get 50 cents of every tax dollar we spend on Iraq. It's good to have an ex-CEO as a VP.

      --
      Who do I have to blackmail to get some representation around here!?!?!?!?
    15. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to work for a company that gets to spend billions of dollars of someone elses money to bomb the living s*** out of the competition. Now that's what I call Capitalism!

    16. Re:Are you joking? by demachina · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stop either being naive or thinking everyone who reads your post is. Halliburton is in Iraq to make money, money, money, nothing more, nothing less. They could care less about rebuilding Iraq unless its in their contract that they have to. Their KBR subsidiary follows the Army around like a poodle where ever they go trying to rake in as much money as possible off all its wars and police actions. And its a lot of money, thanks to Dick Cheney in particular who, as Secretary of Defense, reorganized and downsized the Army so they are now totally dependent on KBR to drive to do things like their trucks and cook. Brown and Root was war profiteering in Vietnam 40 years ago.

      I suppose its possible some Halliburton employees are idealists who are there to rebuild Iraq for the Iraqis....gag....sorry....thats so ridiculous I can't even say it with a straight face. They are there for the money too.

      --
      @de_machina
    17. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you trying to scare up someone to fuck you in the ass?

    18. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. That was all done by Western companies...mainly British. Why are there so many Western people still in Saudi Arabia doing the same shit?

    19. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Halliburton is unreasonably overcharging YOU, taxpayer, even if they're passing on a reasonable amount to the contractor. Do you want to support this? The issue is not whether you get paid reasonable wages. That's shortsighted. Find other work that doesn't make the world a worse place by supporting cronyism and big government.
      The Iraqis can rebuild for themselves. It's true! They don't need foreign operations building an infrastructure so their money for services can go to non-local businesses.

      You've proven yourself to have poor insight into the poster's comment. I hate it when people mock others self-righteously (whether ignorantly).

    20. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it kind of like teabagging? Maybe the SCO699FeeTroll can give us some insight here.

    21. Re:Are you joking? by httpoet · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, because as we all know, Halliburton is in Iraq to establish a better way of life for Iraqis, not because of the huge no-bid contracts that were coordinated by ex-CEO and now Vice Predident Dick Cheney.

      Pardon me if I fail to see the humanitarian intentions of an oil company with close - possibly criminal - ties to the administration.

    22. Re:Are you joking? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      What was wrong with the grammar there? Nothing? Oh.

      --
      My other car is first.
    23. Re:Are you joking? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      You talk as if making money were some sort of sin. What sort of bullshit are *you* selling?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    24. Re:Are you joking? by Gopal · · Score: 1

      They got contractors in Iraq, and they probably need work. No need to send the scoundrels from Halliburton. The imperialistic thought that the iraqis cant do it themselves, but can be workforce, is disgusting.

    25. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what businesses do, you fucktard. If you're going to criticize Haliburton for wanting to make money you ought criticize every other business in the world.

    26. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average Iraqi wants us to leave...
      You got this information from the polls?

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/s to ries/2004/03_march/16/iraq_polls.shtml

      Average is a broad statement. An earlier post pointed out (with URL) that the CPA polls were generalized a bit too much.

      http://www.cpa-iraq.org/government/political_pol l. pdf

      The Full CPA report. ..new Iraqi government..
      "interim" (as in temporary).

      Right now, if you build it, it will just get torn down...If we get security under control, we can start to make some progress on the rebuilding part.

      Part of increasing mental security is rebuilding.
      Medicine, Police, Telecommunication, Schools, Jobs. Tell me, would YOU feel secure if all these aspects of your daily life were on shakey ground?

      As for physical security the same notion applies. If things never change or get better, then the ammount of "insurgents" might never decrease.

      However, I do understand where the argument for increasing physical security first comes in, but totally neglecting rebuilding would also be neglecting the Iraqi people. We, the U.S., did start this war (much to many people's chagrin). The last thing we need is to be hated even more in the middle east.

      Also, for clarification please post where you got the information on the numerous truck bombings and beheadings. As well as buildings and services being torn down as they are being built. As far as I percieve it, those incidences have been few and far between. About as frequent as a bombing in isreal.

      All your post signifies is a kneejerk reaction to the recent events and a failure to understand the process of rebuilding. While I respect your credentials, I fail to see any insight or thought in your statements.

    27. Re:Are you joking? by demachina · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "making money were some sort of sin"

      You are putting words in my mouth at least as far as that post goes. All I said is call a spade a spade. Halliburton, KBR and Bechtel are in Iraq to make money, nothing more, nothing less.

      But, when it comes in the form of war profiteering making money is a sin. It creates a profit motive for war which makes war more likely not less. It makes it more likely people are going to be killed and killing people for no reason is a sin. War profiteering makes it more likely, not less, that false pretenses will be used to start wars. Is it an accident Dick Cheney, KBR's ex CEO was the #1 cheerleader for the war in Iraq. He, no doubt, had numerous motives for starting the war in Iraq but the fact his company is making a mint on it adds a really disturbing edge.

      If the Army told KBR to bulldoze Iraq they would do it just as eagerly as rebuild it if the profit margin was right.

      --
      @de_machina
    28. Re:Are you joking? by demachina · · Score: 1

      I'll say it again to you and every other anonymous coward chicken shit, chicken hawk I didn't criticize Halliburton for making money in that post, I criticized the original poster for pretending like they Halliburton was there to rebuild Iraq out of some noble desire to help Iraqis have a better life. I'll say it again KBR would bulldoze Iraq if the Army told them to and the profit margin was right. I'm just calling a spade a spade.

      Most businesses aren't making money in a war zone. There is a huge difference. Most businesses aren't helping a government invade another countries under false pretenses. Most businesses aren't making money helping kill, and now torture, people.

      --
      @de_machina
    29. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, do you think it would be cheaper to have the US military do all the tasks that Halliburton does? If so, why?

    30. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone is offering you a lot of money, guess how big their take is? There are a few people around who think that "rebuilding" Iraq is a moral responsibility after bombing the snot out of it. The people profiting from the "rebuilding" are not altruistic. They are money grubbers.

      3-5 soldiers die there every day. Inedpendent contractors die there. The unfortunates actually positioned in Iraq have to put a happy face on it, and be patriotic or whatever. But the truth is, they are not there for democracy or freedom or some other flag-waiving reason. Those people are dying every day to make some fat cat richer. The fat cat is smart enough to coordinate the thing from Vermont and never set foot in the region.

    31. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I take it that you would criticize Bill Clinton more strongly than you would Dick Cheney because he made the military even smaller--and more dependent on civilian contractors--than Cheney. Have I got that right?

    32. Re:Are you joking? by demachina · · Score: 1

      In the short term its a certainty the Army could do the job cheaper. Grunts get paid a fraction of what contractors get paid, plus there is a big overhead/mark up for a civilian contractor. When the contractor starts padding the books on everything then it gets really expensive. The famous example in Iraq was one of Halliburton's subs was grossly overstating the number of meals they were serving in the mess hall.

      The only factor that works against using soldiers is they are kind of expensive in the long run thanks to some of the benefits.

      The bigger problem with using contractors is you create an army that isn't self sufficient and it causes a lot of problems. Using contractors to drive trucks in supply convoys in a war zone is bad. They should be driven by soldiers with weapons and thoroughly protected by the Army's assets.

      Having your army fed by local subcontractors is especially stupid. Many troops are being fed by Saudi and Kuwaiti contractors who are presumably Arab and Muslim. If the insurgents infiltrate a few of their own in to these messes it would be extraordinarily easy to incapacitate an army without firing a shot.

      --
      @de_machina
    33. Re:Are you joking? by demachina · · Score: 1

      Downsizing the military is an OK thing to do as long as you aren't planning on invading a large country for no particularly good reason, and creating a situation where you need a huge occupation army you don't have.

      Its very desirable for a lot of reasons to have as small a standing army as possible, but which is still a creditable deterant to potential enemies. When you run into an enemy spoiling for a fight you can't avoid, you declare war, institute a draft, call up the reserves and deal with it as was done in World War II. The Bush administration is trying to fight a huge war on the cheap, without the draft and without the troops. To solve the problem they are squandering huge sums on contractors, the constractors are making out like bandits and tax payers are getting royally screwed.

      I'm not sure where Clinton stood in downsizing the military and moving the jobs to contractors instead. If he was a big fan of it then he is in the same class as Cheney in my book. Cheney its really clear he was really fond of switching from underpaid grunts no big company could profit from to overpaid contractors HIS company can profit from.

      --
      @de_machina
    34. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Clinton Administration engaged in massive downsiding of the military--Army: 14 divisions to 10, Air Force: 17 wings to 13; Navy: 400+ ships to close to 300. The Clinton Administration also engaged in more military actions abroad than the administrations of Nixon, Ford, Carger, Reagan, and George H.W. Bush combined. (Admittedly, some of the actions were small scale.) He also called up reservists, e.g., 30,000 reservists for Kosovo.

      With respect to the situation in Iraq, do you think Cheney benefits in any way from contracts to Halliburton? AFAIK, he owns no Halliburton stock and his deferred compensation comes from an annuity. He has an irrevocable agreement to donate the profits from his stock options to charity. If Halliburton becomes immensely profitable or goes bankrupt, it will make no financial difference to Cheney. If you think Cheney somehow personally profits from Halliburton's Iraq contracts, please describe how.

    35. Re:Are you joking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE DENSE.

  6. Don't risk your life. by Wig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your life is worth infintely more than any amount of money. People who do this must be crazy. Do you really want to be beheaded because you want a new Mercedes?

    1. Re:Don't risk your life. by really? · · Score: 4, Informative

      You've spent no time in the area, have you? I personally don't think you have.

      Yes, it's more dangerous than a lot of the places in the US/Europe/etc, but, nowhere near as bad as the media tries to make it out.

      Last time I was in the area, during the HIGHT of the previous "war", I found one, yes ONE, person who got in my face for being "American". I politely explained to him that I was not, and even if I were I was there as a traveler not as a representant of my government. He refused let it be and soon enough the other people around told him, in Arabic, to shut up and leave us alone - I was there with a friend.
      Eventually he tried to "get physical" and I chucked him off the ferry (Yes in the water. No the capitan was not amused; but, when the locals explained the situation he had a hard time refraining from laughing.).
      The rest of locals were VERY apologetic for this a-hole's behaviour and congratulated me on having the guts to stand up to him.
      Or, maybe I am just a lucky bastard?

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    2. Re:Don't risk your life. by really? · · Score: 1

      Hate to reply to myself ...

      To the original poster, I would not do it just for the money. It's just not worth it.

      I would however do it if the work itself was exciting. Mind you, I don't have a wife/kids so if something nasty happened to me it would be no great loss except to myself. (Well, my parents too, but they are used to my doing "crazy" things.)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    3. Re:Don't risk your life. by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      Your life is worth infintely more than any amount of money. People who do this must be crazy. Do you really want to be beheaded because you want a new Mercedes?
      For some people, the thrill and adventure and feelings of "I'm helping people" are more important that the money. There are some people who aspire to military or civilian service in war areas. Just because the path isn't one YOU wouldn't choose, there are a lot of people who do choose that.

      Look at all the Red Cross / Red Cresent people who jumped in to the danger just because that's what they want to do, and they see the value of helping rebuild a country or helping others as greater than the risks. Other people jump in and will risk everything for money, or just for the thrill. Obviously YOU wouldn't but some people find that kind of life appealing.

      The question was asking for an account of real dangers based on people with experience, not for beliefs on the value of life.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    4. Re:Don't risk your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead is dead. You used the word 'beheaded' as if it makes some difference. If a person doesn't have a family and can make a boatload of bucks then it is a tempting offer. I would need to know that I am allowed to wear body armor and carry large caliber weapons anywhere I want before I would seriously consider it. When you know they are going to kill you if they get there hands on you then they would never get a chance to behead me. I would rather go down in a blaze of gunfire and try to send one or two of those muslim devils back to Hell.

    5. Re:Don't risk your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not really street smart. Thing your behind enemy lines.

      If you armed yourself to the teeth and went down to the most dangous part of your city how long would you surive acting like that?. People will see you as a serious threat and deal with you as a serious threat. If you go in there with an attiude to fight you will die. Maybe you will die fighting but most likely you'l get a bullet in your back and never know till its to late.

    6. Re:Don't risk your life. by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I talk to myself all the time.
      Besides, I've been there, I'd rather work there than Cabrini Greene; a white person there, on foot, would have a life expectancy measured in seconds.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    7. Re:Don't risk your life. by really? · · Score: 1

      Indeed, or the "Robert Taylor Homes" project. But, it's not fashionable to show that kind of stuff on TV. (Could it be that it's too close to home, literally and figuratively???)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    8. Re:Don't risk your life. by spectasaurus · · Score: 1

      So what exactly are you if you are not an American, but even if you are, then you were there as a traveler? Are you an American or not? And if so, then why would you try to tell them you aren't unless you're afraid of admitting it?

      By pushing someone in the water, I tend to think you are an American.

    9. Re:Don't risk your life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, your such an ignorant idiot, i dont know whether to laugh of just feel bad for you.

    10. Re:Don't risk your life. by really? · · Score: 1

      I am not American, but, if need be, I can be as loud and obnoxious as one. :-)
      So, I was there as a traveler, in fact I was riding my bicycle through the country in _August_ - yes, I am aware that doesn't say much about my common sense.
      As to what I am, not that it should matter, I am currently Canadian. The reason the guy, as well as just everyone else in the area, thought I was american is, and I am guessing here, size[1] and the fact that we were speaking English.

      [1] I could easily get lost in a group of Navy SEALs.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  7. A Rescue Disk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Might be of use to you on your trip.

    1. Re:A Rescue Disk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just in case that doesn't work, as a backup you should bring a roll of Life Savers!

    2. Re:A Rescue Disk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That could be useful, if you forgot to bring an Escape Key.

    3. Re:A Rescue Disk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      They have no Control keys over there now.

    4. Re:A Rescue Disk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Plenty of Delete keys to go around, though.

    5. Re:A Rescue Disk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You guys are "fuckfaces".

    6. Re:A Rescue Disk... by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer a couple magazines of .223 inch "rescue disks."

    7. Re:A Rescue Disk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember your towel.

    8. Re:A Rescue Disk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just watch out for those Blue Screens... ouch!

    9. Re:A Rescue Disk... by r00k123 · · Score: 1

      These jokes have gotta End...

    10. Re:A Rescue Disk... by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      screw that, I'd much rather have a Home button.

  8. i've always wanted to do this... by trybywrench · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but every time I start giving it some real thought someone else gets abducted and murdered. I don't know what the pay rate is, i'm more interested in just the experience but i dunno if i'm confotable with the risks.

    ..maybe northern Iraq with the Kurds, from what i understand things are pretty stable there.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    1. Re:i've always wanted to do this... by hdd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah sure, saudi arabia was pretty stable too...

      --
      This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
    2. Re:i've always wanted to do this... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      yeah sure, saudi arabia was pretty stable too...

      Yeah, sure, Denmark was pretty stable too...

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  9. Ask this guy by eagl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ask this guy: http://www.savagenet.com/expat/viewforum.php?f=1

    1. Re:Ask this guy by EvanED · · Score: 1
      phpBB : Critical Error

      Error creating new session

      He seems to not like the idea...

      What kind of name is phpBB anyway?
    2. Re:Ask this guy by Peridriga · · Score: 1

      Now how the hell is this guy going to fix his melted server from a war zone :-)

      He might have balls but, he doesn't have magic

    3. Re:Ask this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bulletin Board?

    4. Re:Ask this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whoosh*

      That's the sound of the joke going right over your head...

    5. Re:Ask this guy by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      Most users ever online was 124 on Fri Jun 18, 2004 7:03 pm

      124? That's a slashdotting?

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  10. My first first! by hdd · · Score: 1

    I don't know, i would not risk my life for money, you chance being abducted is probably higher than wining lottery jackpot. As you said you already have a stable job, i don't understand why you would want to leave all that behind?

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
    1. Re:My first first! by PaulBu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i would not risk my life for money...

      You know, when you drive to your office and back you are risking your life for money... Same if you walk... ;-/ And do not even think of any kind of construction jobs or anything related to heavy equipment!

      I guess that what you wanted to say was that you would not accept an average pot of money for an above-average risk to your life. But that is reasonable, this is why averages and medians often coincide in social sciences! ;-)

      Paul B.

    2. Re:My first first! by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      you chance being abducted is probably higher than wining lottery jackpot.


      This assumes conditions in the Middle East stay roughly the same as they are now. From the looks of the news, however, I'd say things are deteriorating. I know that I, for one, would not want to be in Saudi Arabia when the shit really hits the fan...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  11. Don't do it for the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's all I have to say.

  12. I certainly wouldn't do it by google · · Score: 1

    I don't think that they are ready for the geek brigades yet; let the Army communications officers handle it until it dies down. I'm sure they'll still pay handily in a few months.

    OTOH, you'd probably be in the back someplace... but you never know...

    --
    "Thank you. Please spellcheck your genitalia references though. :) - Mike D."
  13. *in song* by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tellllnet into the danger zone!

    Tom Cruise would be so proud of me.

    --

    Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    1. Re:*in song* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aww, you only gave him a 1? That was worth more than that :(

    2. Re:*in song* by ELP000 · · Score: 1

      You better start doing some of that networking shit Mav.... they're on to us...

    3. Re:*in song* by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 1
      Link to me Goose...comeon...Link to me.

      Although, if it meant I got to bang the cute female Top Security Clearance Contractor...well...let's just say that perk perks my interest...

    4. Re:*in song* by Bombcar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude! It's a war zone!

      You gotta use SSH!

    5. Re:*in song* by daveashcroft · · Score: 0

      Hey, you forgot you were posting on slashdot.

      Surely you meant OPENSSH!

  14. New danger by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Before people were taken as hostages, now they are being taken as sacrifices (in a way). I don't think theres many ways we can apply old stories to Afganistan and Iraq.

    Money is worth alot but it can't buy you back your life.

    --
    I like muppets.
  15. Use Common Sense! by Space_Soldier · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I have never been there, nor do I have a job in networking, or one at all, all I can say is that you should never travel or work alone. Find a way to get some protection. Get a gun, and some self-defence classes before you go. I have been in Middle East. I have lived in Israel for a few years and got an Israeli citizenship.

    1. Re:Use Common Sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right. If you tell them you know Karate, they won't fuck with you...

    2. Re:Use Common Sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you out of your mind? You suggest "protection", "a gun" and self-defense classes as though they would actually be of use against the people the poster is worried about. Hint: they're crazy and they have AK-47s.

      FWIW, my feeling is that the money just ain't worth risking your life.

    3. Re:Use Common Sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope your self-defense lessons were better than you grammer lessons.....

    4. Re:Use Common Sense! by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

      Speaking of "grammer", I must say that the actual spelling is GRAMMAR.

    5. Re:Use Common Sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it is grammer see here: Grammer

    6. Re:Use Common Sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going over to the Middle East working under a communicatons contract, I'm pretty sure you are not authorized to carry a weapon.

      Also, if you wanna go over there and tell everyone that you want to get your ass shot, go through Israel and get an Israeli stamp in your passport. All countries in the Gulf region will not allow you in with an Israeli stamp anyways, and they all hate Israel. Yes, they all hate Israel, and anyone of Jewish descent. An American Jew in the Middle East has a worse chance of survival than a white cracker in Compton.

    7. Re:Use Common Sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? An AK-47 is just a gun...they aren't a super weapon.

    8. Re:Use Common Sense! by PsibrII · · Score: 1

      Great, you've moved to a sandheap so desolate and wasted that farmers from there who have moved to mexico made "unfarmable" land in mexico bloom and thought it was easy.

      So lets look at the logic here, you have gone to great effort to go live in a wasted sandheap with other crazy people.

      Hmm. ((Pondering....)) Now if we in the US could only make up some sort of bogus "holy land" for rednecks and white trash in some burned out hell pit it would be all good. Wait a minute...((coffee kicking in)) oh yeah, thats right, they call it arizona. Silly me.

      Then theres that one called "utah" where other crazy people go. Hmm. Maybe there is a "God" after all who does a public service by luring the crazies out into the wastelands to cull them from the sane breeding populations in the temperate zones.

      Now to find out how many desert rats have mod points today. ;)

    9. Re:Use Common Sense! by PsibrII · · Score: 1

      Actually, that gives me like inspiration. You could have a million UAVs the size of a paperback zipping around when gunfire started, loaded full of explosives and BBs(like a flying claymore mine) that homed in on the sonic boom noise signature of AK-47 fire. You could perhaps use the explosive for propellant. Since things like C4 just burn white hot until hit with a detonation wave front from a blasting cap. Even if they clued in they could never afford to up or down load the ammo the cheap and expendable foot soldiers of the resistance use.

  16. Only one way... by Timex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...they would get me to go: Arm me to the teeth, and train me in the proper use of the weapon(s). If I had to go over there as a civilian, I want to be an armed one. If, however, they want to put me in a military uniform to go, that's okay with me.

    The al-Quaeda fanatics need to be stopped. They don't care about anyone but themselves. Everything they are doing is only hurting the Iraqi people.

    --
    When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    1. Re:Only one way... by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The DoD was recently debating if civilian contractors should be allowed to arm themselves.

      The fact that they where even debating the issue should give you pause.

    2. Re:Only one way... by azav · · Score: 4, Informative

      One of my friends is over there in the service.

      Whether you think the war is right or not, he is there and feels like he is "serving his country." This is not your average yahoo.

      Anyway, he sums it up like this. 60% of the people want us there, 20 percent don't care and would like us to get out as soon as we can and the reamaining 20% are completely insane and un/miseducated fanatics.

      If you're interested in reading his blog, he is at :
      http://www.missick.com

      Enlightening reads whether you agree with his views or not.

      Hope you find this worthwhile.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    3. Re:Only one way... by krumms · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      lol, meanwhile the Americans are piling naked Iraqi's on top of one another.

      This helps the Iraqi people how?

    4. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The al-Quaeda fanatics need to be stopped. They don't care about anyone but themselves. Everything they are doing is only hurting the Iraqi people.


      Huh? And what precisely do the al-Quaeda fanatics have to do with Iraq?

      Unless all of our western intelligence agencies have failed miserably, al-Quaeda people only began moving in Iraq as a direct result of Gulf War 2...

    5. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they are debating if normal civilian contractors can now carry arms like the mercenary "civilian contractors" are already doing?

    6. Re:Only one way... by KrispyKringle · · Score: 4, Insightful
      According to the 9/11 Commission, "[w]e have no credible evidence that Iraq and Al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."

      I fully agree that violent fanatics need to be stopped, be they Muslim suicide bombers or Christian crusaders in the guise of American patriots.

    7. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In case you have all forgotten, those contractors that were taken out of their convoy, dragged, beaten, and then burned while being hung from a bridge WERE ARMED. Some were civilian body guards, HEAVILY ARMED. One more point to ponder - our US military, namely US Marines, are over there being killed daily. Granted you probably wont be on the front lines. You will probably be back in a somewhat safer area. But from what I have seen and my own experience I would rather be up front with the guns and somebody who I KNOW has my six covered. Where I can call in the big guns if I have to. I cant believe they let americans wander around at all over there without being heavily protected.
      I just regret that younger soldiers are over there now because we were not allowed to finish it when I was there.

      Just my two cents
      (from an infantry marine, gulf war, take 1)

    8. Re:Only one way... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I would bet those aren't DoD contractors that you are calling mercanary, they are more likely to be CIA or another intel outfit.

    9. Re:Only one way... by PerlMonkey · · Score: 1

      It removes their outdates taboos towards unlimited sexual self-expression. But the flashlights are too small, quite frankly.

    10. Re:Only one way... by swimmar132 · · Score: 1

      Amazing that a couple prison guards can be "the Americans".

      That's like saying that the muslims are flying airplanes into our buildings.

      Get a life.

    11. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please...

      One of the '93 WTC bombers was given sanctuary in iraq. And put on the payroll, and given money. To say that they were not involved with al qaeda is crap.
      One good thing that bush has said(among many other idiotic things)is 'either you are with us or you are against us'. Terrorism is not something to sit on the fence about.

    12. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The al-Quaeda fanatics need to be stopped. They don't care about anyone but themselves. Everything they are doing is only hurting the Iraqi people."

      The real problem and dilema is that no Iraqi will believe this as long as a single American remains in Iraq!

      Did you not hear of that poll that was leaked out of the US military the other day? American military pollsters actually interviewed Iraqis on the street and asked their opinion of Americans. The jist of it was that almost no Iraqis are willing to tolerate Americans under any circumstances!

      By the way, I saw this on Canadian TV. I hope it also appeared on USA TV networks. Did it?

    13. Re:Only one way... by Ultra+Magnus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >The al-Quaeda fanatics need to be stopped. They don't care about anyone but themselves. Everything they are doing is only hurting the Iraqi people.

      Wow, that could totally be rewritten as:
      The American fanatics need to be stopped. They don't care about anyone but themselves. Everything they are doing is only hurting the Iraqi people.

    14. Re:Only one way... by JessLeah · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The plural of "Iraqi" is "Iraqis", not "Iraqi's". Fucking moron.

    15. Re:Only one way... by KrispyKringle · · Score: 0, Troll
      Got a source? 'Cause I got a whole damn lot saying that there's no link that we know of. Of course, lack of evidence is not evidence of lack, but until I see otherwise, I'm going to have to go with the most likely position, which is that Bush'n'Co made the whole fucking thing up. Not saying Saddam wasn't a bad guy who should be stopped. But we were lied to, we were brought to war under false pretenses, and we, as a nation, have been made responsible for horrible things that none of us ever wanted.

      But I'm getting a bit off topic.

    16. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about the Halliburton mercenary army.

    17. Re:Only one way... by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It COULD, but it would be incorrect.

      MANY things are hurting the Iraqi people, and I don't think we should be there. That said, the US is doing a hell of a lot of good work in restoring/building infrastructure in Iraq. This is helping, NOT hurting the Iraqis...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    18. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like saying that the muslims are flying airplanes into our buildings.

      They are. Rub 'em out.

      Sincerely,
      Ann Coulter

    19. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      source - yes, Dick Cheney told me about it while I had my tongue up his ass

    20. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure it is even (exclusively) Americans doing stuff like that... Abu Graib Guard showing off a tattoo

    21. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, right grabbing people in the streets, putting them into random hidden prison facilities and then making funny pictures?

      Or using apache helicopters to blast wedding parties?

      Or using civilian contractors to beat afgan prisoners to death

      Sure, it was only a few misguided sheep, just like the few misguided sheeps in the white house.

      Sorry, but if someone is going to use the "greater good" excuse to topple a government he has to grind an axe with, he better makes sure that he is playing with a white west.

    22. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would bet those aren't normal civillians that you are calling Halliburton mercanary, they are more likely to be CIA or another intel outfit.

    23. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you weren't a marine since you would know that soldiers don't use "six" or any other numbers to designate direction. And BTW, where are the front lines in Iraq, most American casulties have been from ambushes.

    24. Re:Only one way... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right. Couple of Americans walked into a prison complex one day, and decided to abuse some prisoners. After which time, the MPs found them, and threw the interlopers out...

      Perhaps you're forgetting that these interlopers were members of the Army, an outfit which pretends to care about discipline and chain of command and responsibility. Perhaps you're forgetting that some brilliant lawyers in the White House dreamt up legal strategies in defense of torture.

      It's quite difficult to argue that the efforts of the White House and the Department of Defense are somehow not representative of American policy.

    25. Re:Only one way... by Templaris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did anyone else notice the irony of an infantry marine posting as an anonymous coward?

      (no no, I like the marines, but I couldnt pass it up...seeing as how I am a gigantic ass with two arms protruding allowing me to express myself....God, I love Cottenelle..)

    26. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this explains who "they" are: http://www.counterpunch.org/abughraib05242004.html

    27. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All that stuff was working before the US blew it all up. Of course they should fix it, it's their fault it's broken. This is a "duh". this is like thanking Mr. Burglar for being a nice guy and fixzing the window he broke when he slipped in to snag all your loot. It's not a heck of a lot of good, it's a pittance of feel goodism to give the appearance of propiety to disguise the serious criminality over the illegal invasion of another soverign nation.

      Remember, the military kills people and breaks things, that's their job, that's the only thing they even remotely do adequately. Now they got a big mess, and have turned a number of people away from any sort of western styled society, because everything their Islamic clerics told them about the west and what would happen to them came true. The americans came in, wiped out people, destroyed all sorts of stuff, and then they took over the prisons, slammed people in their under little pretext, and tortured and killed a lot of them, and they still support israel and are doing their best to get the free oil pipeline to israel set up and running smoothly-again, what was predicted to happen that was broadcast to the people there is coming true. They would get invaded and have their oil stolen, and the US would put in a puppet government and still stay there forever. All that is true, they state this is what has happened and what will happen. And the torture pictures released are the tame pictures.

      And here's a final thought. Iraq is an artifical creation of the british empire a long time ago, and it took a dictator like saddam to keep basically three separate nations together as one nation. That is the only level of coercion that will keep iraq a single nation. there is no peaceful democratic way to do this. So you have to ask yourself, is the attempt in and of itself harebrained and misguided? I would say probably so-unless you accept it was based totally on lies and the invasion was for two purposes-steal theoil and get a permanent land based large military presence on the ground in the mideast, and two, remove one threat that the zionazis saw to their eventual expansions they thing are their eventual right. Then this invasion makes a sort of twisted sense. The top administration people are all israeli firsters and professional lobbyists, and/or they make millions personally from their ties to the oil and military industrial complex corporations. To me, the evidence is clear, the war was wrong from who started it-they should all be in jail really, various crimes-and they have constantly bungled it, they are just too stupid to be entrusted with actions of this caliber. I mean, boneheaded stupid, not any sort of world class thinkers represented there. Rumsfeld? Bonehead. Cheney? A psycho. Bush? A marionette with some serious social issues. Rice? Puh-lease...... wolfowitz, perle, geez, we got some winners there.....

    28. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the private security forces are ex-military, the most prominent one, Blackwater has lots of guards who were in special forces.

    29. Re:Only one way... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Russia apparently had been telling the US that Saddam's regime was planning their own terror attacks against the US. Of course, they didn't mention that publicly while the whole build-up for war was going on.

      http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/06/18/saddam.t error/index.html
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3819057.stm

    30. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb2 0040617.asp#1
      (please remember to remove the blank space if you C&P)

      Perhaps you should Click.

    31. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since when are we trusting the russians with anything they say? Ahh, right, when it comes convenient :)

    32. Re:Only one way... by Timex · · Score: 1

      Huh? And what precisely do the al-Quaeda fanatics have to do with Iraq?

      Well, depending on who you chose to believe, they may have been a factor in the invasion of Iraq last year.

      Either way, al Quaeda doesn't want us in Saudi Arabia (never mind that we are there with the permission of the Saudi government, and that we would have to leave whenever they tell us to).

      Unless all of our western intelligence agencies have failed miserably, al-Quaeda people only began moving in Iraq as a direct result of Gulf War 2...

      Check your facts, friend. bin Laden has been linked directly with the bombing of the US embassies in the African continent (Kenya and Tanzania) in 1998, and there may be connections with the bombing of the USS Cole in 2001.

      I have a good friend of mine that re-enlisted in the National Guard this past January, knowing full-well that he might get called to go. He's been in "an undisclosed location" (aka Baghdad) for about a month now. He believes he's there to help the Iraqi people, and I think he is, too.

      To see the way that these al Quaeda zealots work against people who are trying to help others is completely disgusting. They have no respect for human life whatsoever, and to perform their tricks in the name of their god is (i think) an insult to Muslims the world over.

      If I weren't a bit on the "old side", I'd go in a heart-beat. I've served in the Navy, so the idea of being in the military is not foreign to me.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    33. Re:Only one way... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Anyway, he sums it up like this. 60% of the people want us there, 20 percent don't care and would like us to get out as soon as we can and the reamaining 20% are completely insane and un/miseducated fanatics.

      And the methodology for his study is what? And he defines "fanatic" how? No disrespect meant to your friend there, but the plural of "anecdote" is not "data." Back here on earth, more credible studies paint a much bleaker picture of Iraqi sentiment towards the occupation.

    34. Re:Only one way... by Timex · · Score: 1

      Yea, right grabbing people in the streets, putting them into random hidden prison facilities and then making funny pictures?

      (1) the idiot that authorized that kind of treatment should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. (2) those prisoners, although embarrassed, lived. they'll get over it. the two men that lost their heads to a group of soulless barbarians will never recover from the torment they received.

      Or using apache helicopters to blast wedding parties?

      Go find someone that's been to Viet Nam, and ask them if they had an easy time telling who the Enemy was. In Iraq, most of the people are friendly enough. The few that are the problem cannot be picked out of a crowd based on their appearance. Any time weapons are fired, they get nervous. Given the nature of the environment, I'm actually more surprised that the people at this wedding party didn't have the sense to find another way to make noise, if they wanted to celebrate.

      Sure, it was only a few misguided sheep, just like the few misguided sheeps in the white house.

      ....or the misguided sheep at your end of the 'Net. I'll grant you that the RESPONSIBILITY ultimately falls on Bush (more on that in a second), but that does NOT mean that it was his call to do it.

      When I served in the Navy, they taught us an important rule of leadership: You can delegate Authority, but you cannot delegate Responsibility. I think that speaks for itself.

      I am sad that there are people that so hate President Bush that they are willing to blame him for every thing possible, all the while being completely blind to the facts at hand.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    35. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said the Army was perfect? You sound pretentious. What skeletons are in your closet?

    36. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm.........not to be rude or anything, but you are aware that Kenya and Tanzania are not in Iraq, right? And you are the aware that the Cole bombing took place in Yemen, which is also not in Iraq. So what point were you trying to make there?

      You are correct that all of those incidents are linked to Al-Qaeda, however there is no connection between Iraq and Al-Qaeda. This has been formally recognized by the 9/11 commission over the past few days.

    37. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right.........

      Because a conservative think tank would never, ever try and spin something now would it?

      And yes, the MRC is a conservative organization.

      Look for yourself if you don't believe me


    38. Re:Only one way... by moof1138 · · Score: 1

      (1) the idiot that authorized that kind of treatment should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

      It turns out that Rumsfeld approved the use of torture. He testified about half a year ago before Congress that he did not. This is a man who needs to go to jail.

      those prisoners, although embarrassed, lived.

      That is incorrect. You might have missed the pictures of Miss England next to the corpse giving the thumbs up, but Taguba's report referred to prisoners dying during torture, and the various efforts at coverups for those murders.

      Beyond that, those who were tortured are going to be left with blood in their eye. We will be very lucky if they don't join the ranks of those sawing off the heads off contractors. We can take it for granted that their story will at least inspire others to join up.

      --

      Hyperbole is the worst thing ever.
    39. Re:Only one way... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      So you think Saddam Hussein should be put back in power then?

    40. Re:Only one way... by lasindi · · Score: 1
      Unless all of our western intelligence agencies have failed miserably, al-Quaeda people only began moving in Iraq as a direct result of Gulf War 2...

      Uh, they seem to have failed miserably as far as weapons of mass destruction are concerned. I supported the war, and don't blame anyone in particular for this apparent intelligence failure since everyone, including the French and Germans, believed Saddam had WMD before the war.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem that this sig is too small to contain.
    41. Re:Only one way... by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      No, but at least we shouldn't have loaned him one billion dollars just after he massacred all those Kurds. We knew about it. The whole world knew about it.

      Please educate yourself before you take the moral high ground.

    42. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to hear that sentences from you after you got randomly thrown in jail in your hometown and raped by a prison guard.

    43. Re:Only one way... by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to President Bush, the administration has never said that Iraq was directly complicit in the September 11 attacks. He does say, however, that the Saddam regime was involved in providing a safe haven inside Iraq for the training of al-Qaeda operatives.

    44. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the people that are running around killing Iraqis and Westerners in Iraq and claim to be part of Al-Qaeda are just poseurs? The 9/11 commission just said that there wasn't any direct Iraqi involvement in the attack. That doesn't mean that they weren't cooperating any before or after or dealing with other international terrorist groups. The most blatant is Saddam's paying off the families of suicide bombers. The administration never said that we invaded Iraq because of the 9/11 attacks. It was because of violations of UN security council resolutions...something that should have been done in the 1990s. The only ones that keep harping about Iraq not being involved in 9/11 is the Leftist pieces of shit that would rather have Saddam in power.

    45. Re:Only one way... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      They were right. The reason they can't find a lot of it is because it's been sold as scrap metal, hidden, or moved out of the country in other ways.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    46. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was payment for the job of killing all those Iranians. The UN knew it was being snookered with the oil for food program, but it looked good to the leftists nincompoops that populate most colleges these days and it helped funnel money into one of the permanent member nations (France).

    47. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many Al-Qaeda operatives were running around Iraq killing Iraqis and westerners before Bush Jr. invaded? None. How many are there now? Tons. Go figure.

      The only ones that keep harping about Iraq not being involved in 9/11 is the Leftist pieces of shit that would rather have Saddam in power.

      Have you ever heard any American say that he or she wishes Saddam were back in power? Me neither. Not even the dirty Berkeley hippies say that.

    48. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saddam did a whole lot worse. Are you suggesting you want him back?

    49. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it wasn't. The condition of the Iraqi infrastructure was in shables. All resources were being diverted to Saddam's pet projects (military, palaces, son's perverted ideas, etc.). The conditions in the prisons are lightyears better than what they were under Saddam. Why do you dolts keep painting the picture that life in Iraq was all fun and games? The people are much better off now. The only people believing the propaganda of the Islamic extremists are the idiots they get to blow themselves up and the leftist pieces of shit in the West. Maybe we should get both of those groups thogether and it would solve all our problems.

    50. Re:Only one way... by sffubs · · Score: 1

      > Terrorism is not something to sit on the fence about.

      Except that the US has turned a blind eye to those in its country supporting terrorism for some time now.

      Many people really don't care about terrorism until it actually affects them.

      --
      ݼ)s$æúßðíÊ'öX'îò5^àûßQç£
    51. Re:Only one way... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Either way, al Quaeda doesn't want us in Saudi Arabia (never mind that we are there with the permission of the Saudi government, and that we would have to leave whenever they tell us to).

      1) Saudi-arabia is a dictatorship. Not even a very benevolent one. Torture and random assassination of political enemies is commonplace there.
      2) A LOT of saudis hate the american presence there. Putting soldiers on someone else's holy land is not a smart move politically.
      3) You've just admitted al qaeda is blowback. Shouldn't that make you more critical of current US policies in Iraq and the middle east in general, given that they are creating a fresh generation of terrorists hellbent on attacking america?

      Check your facts, friend. bin Laden has been linked directly with the bombing of the US embassies in the African continent (Kenya and Tanzania) in 1998, and there may be connections with the bombing of the USS Cole in 2001.

      I've got news for you: there is no such thing as pure evil. Every terrorist group has their own agenda. Sometimes those agenda's coincide, sometimes they don't. In the case of Iraq, it has been demonstrated that Bin Laden tried to get Saddam on board, and Saddam just never got back to him. After all, what could Bin Laden offer Saddam? It's not like Saddam ever showed any intention of wanting to kill americans just because they're americans. If you're curious about Bin Laden's agenda, read this. Bin Laden goes into quite some detail (a little too much even), explaining his reasons for hating america, and explaining what his political aims with al qaeda are (the answer to question 2). So, no, before Gulf War II there was no credible indication of cooperation between Saddam and Bin Laden. If there was, they would have found it already.

      I have a good friend of mine that re-enlisted in the National Guard this past January, knowing full-well that he might get called to go. He's been in "an undisclosed location" (aka Baghdad) for about a month now. He believes he's there to help the Iraqi people, and I think he is, too.

      Nobody here is claiming the people who enlist here go over there with the intention of doing evil. The reality though is that Iraq is a mess, and the US presence on the ground is really not helping matters. I don't blame the soldiers and contractors in Iraq, they're only doing their job. I blame the bush administration for lack of planning and lack of insight into Iraq. They screwed it up, they should pay the price, not the people on the ground giving their lives trying to help people.

      To see the way that these al Quaeda zealots work against people who are trying to help others is completely disgusting. They have no respect for human life whatsoever, and to perform their tricks in the name of their god is (i think) an insult to Muslims the world over.

      Like the way Bush uses God to excuse his policies is an insult to christians the world over?

      By dehumanizing al qaeda you make it ok to treat whoever you believe to be a part of it as non-human or sub-human. We've seen the pictures of what that kind of attitude leads to. If you want the moral high ground, you've got to stick to the facts, and not let your emotions and hate get in the way.

    52. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think that's what he thinks? Can you fucking americans GROW THE FUCK UP?! This is, y'know, fairly serious business. Or is "i kill u u eevil commie!!1!" all you fucking got? Wankers.

    53. Re:Only one way... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Huh? And what precisely do the al-Quaeda fanatics have to do with Iraq?
      It was simple, they wanted to remove its secular government and replace it a very fanatical religeous one. They wanted Saddam gone just like Bush & Rumsfeld did - for their own very different reasons. The supposed link was a very obvious line of bullshit like the disappearing niger uranium.

      It looks like I'll have to live through the same stupid wartime misinformation that my parents did.

    54. Re:Only one way... by Timex · · Score: 1

      1) Saudi-arabia is a dictatorship. Not even a very benevolent one. Torture and random assassination of political enemies is commonplace there.

      The interesting thing about Saudi Arabia is that there is a constant battle between the House of Saud and the religious leaders. Saud rules, but they know that they'd get overthrown quick if they tell the Islamic leaders to back off.

      Shouldn't that make you more critical of current US policies in Iraq and the middle east in general, given that they are creating a fresh generation of terrorists hellbent on attacking america?

      Why? Just because the Liberal Left hates Bush with a passion doesn't mean that they are CORRECT. Actually, I find their bias completely laughable. The end result of their ranting gives us such things as an animatedAl Gore, a group of folk that take movies at face value (let's check our laws of Physics at the door, shall we?), and a religious fervor against war that hasn't been seen since the Viet Nam era. Here's a shock for you: I'm an IT Geek, and I actually support our purpose for being in Iraq! <gasp!>

      So, no, before Gulf War II there was no credible indication of cooperation between Saddam and Bin Laden. If there was, they would have found it already.

      Well, if Russia is to be believed....

      I blame the bush administration for lack of planning and lack of insight into Iraq. They screwed it up, they should pay the price, not the people on the ground giving their lives trying to help people.

      Hm. So Bush and Company didn't take into consideration that a loon like Saddam would have his army melt into the general population and resort to guerilla warfare and terrorism, and you want to blame him? Please.

      Like the way Bush uses God to excuse his policies is an insult to christians the world over?

      No, like the Democrats claiming that they are looking out for the Little Guy, when they are making a complete ass of them. (look how things are happening in Boston, with respect to the Democratic National Convention. That's one complete fuck-up if i ever saw one. It's already $10M over budget. They can't get their heads out of their ass for a peaceful conference like this, and they want us to believe that they can run a war?!? Whoever writes their game plan should get into comedy. they'd make a killing.

      By dehumanizing al qaeda you make it ok to treat whoever you believe to be a part of it as non-human or sub-human. We've seen the pictures of what that kind of attitude leads to. If you want the moral high ground, you've got to stick to the facts, and not let your emotions and hate get in the way.

      That is exactly why I do not advocate a blanket "shoot 'em all and let God sort 'em out" attitude. The majority of the local people there aren't looking for trouble; they are just living day-to-day. The general population should not be punished for the extreme actions of a (relative) few.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    55. Re:Only one way... by khasim · · Score: 1

      "The interesting thing about Saudi Arabia is that there is a constant battle between the House of Saud and the religious leaders. Saud rules, but they know that they'd get overthrown quick if they tell the Islamic leaders to back off."

      Whatever. That still does not change the fact that they are a US supported DICTATORSHIP that practices political assassinations.

      "Why? Just because the Liberal Left hates Bush with a passion doesn't mean that they are CORRECT."

      Those links are to commentary about a fictional movie. And the movie SUCKED from the reviews it has received. Would you care to focus on actual events instead of movies?

      "Well, if Russia is to be believed...."

      Where is the support for that claim? I don't remember seeing anything about that claim in any reports or papers. Bush certainly didn't mention it in any of his speeches.

      No, it looks like, in this case, Russia is not to be believed. Sorry to break that to you.

      "Hm. So Bush and Company didn't take into consideration that a loon like Saddam would have his army melt into the general population and resort to guerilla warfare and terrorism, and you want to blame him? Please."

      Who, besides Bush and Co (and you), did NOT know that they would do that? Even the Pentagon said we'd need more troops.

      "No, like the Democrats claiming that they are looking out for the Little Guy, when they are making a complete ass of them. (look how things are happening in Boston, with respect to the Democratic National Convention. That's one complete fuck-up if i ever saw one. It's already $10M over budget. They can't get their heads out of their ass for a peaceful conference like this, and they want us to believe that they can run a war?!? Whoever writes their game plan should get into comedy. they'd make a killing."

      You are comparing a convention to a war that was sold by a series of lies to the US people? A war that is BILLIONS of dollars more expensive than was initially claimed? A war that is costing more US lives every month?

      I'd take a fucked up convention over a stupid war any day. The sanctions were working. Saddam was not a threat.

      "The general population should not be punished for the extreme actions of a (relative) few."

      But they are. Just today the US fired missles into a residential area.

      Look at how many prisoners were released from Abu Ghraib now. Yet they were being held there for weeks and months prior. If they were guilty, why release them? If they were innocent, why hold them? And don't try to tell me that they were just waiting for the paperwork to process. If that were so, we would NOT be seeing hundreds released a week all of a sudden.

      The US is trapped in a war that Bush lied about. We have no exit strategy. We can't tell who the enemy is. And we're just breeding more terrorists.

      The number of terrorist attacks has INCREASED.

      When a rational person sees that his actions are costing more than anticipated and not achieving his goals, does not the rational person re-evaluate his strategy?

      But Bush? "Stay the course".

    56. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you on several main points, but you sir are an ass. Learn to convince people without proving them right.

    57. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet, liberals still whine that her book is named, "Slander". You, AC, are a perfect example of why.

    58. Re:Only one way... by azav · · Score: 1

      His methodology is that he is living through it and this is based on observation.

      I'mk too far away to make any assumption on his words except to take it for face value and as his observation, not 100% pure true absolute.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    59. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to get in on this and write a huge paragraph about the millitary and governtment and what not and then post it as ac so no one will ever read it, but im lazy, so this will ahve to do

    60. Re:Only one way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's the only way to turn the conversation away from partisan horseshit.

      (Back to lurking...)

  17. You're not alone by Solidsnot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many of us in the military, especially the one's seperating from the military, are getting these same offers. Its definitely tempting to some of these guys but all of them passed on it. Who wants to go do their same job that they were doing in the military and not have at least some sort of self protection, ie. M16, M9 pistol, squad of Marines behind you......

    1. Re:You're not alone by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Many of us in the military, especially the one's seperating from the military, are getting these same offers. Its definitely tempting to some of these guys but all of them passed on it.

      Well, you're obviously missing the revolving door that I (and many others I know) passed through. Obviously, not all of these jobs are combat roles...I was an AF computer tech...never needed a weapon, though I've passed a few rounds through an M16. Personally, I think the threat is way overblown by the media. Sure there is a threat, but if you look at the number of people out there compared to the number who've been abducted or killed, you'll soon realize that it's just about as safe as living in Detroit (as a former resident I was happy to depart the frequent murder capital).

      Something you need to realize is that there are opportunities in many countries for expats, and at very good salaries (double & occasionally triple what you would make in the US, along with that huge tax break), but you need to weigh that against many other things...the risk, the hours, the missed holidays with family, are you keeping up with technology, are you being promoted like your peers stateside, etc., etc. I personally did twelve years overseas in Korea and Germany...not the most dangerous of locations, but not the safest considering things like the Bader-Meinhof gang (there were many bombs & abductions by them back then), and simply taking your life in your hands every time you drove a vehicle in the ROK. Was it worth it?...sure, I learned alot, travelled alot (you can't really learn about other cultures on a vacation), and made a ton of cash. On the down side, I fell behind my peers promotion and training-wise, worked holidays, weekends & two-week shift rotations (talk about losing your mind) for years. The only reason I wouldn't do it now is because I've got a school age kid...maybe once she's off to college though.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  18. Hats Off by BoldAC · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Big props go to you guys who are not letting the terrorists scare you away. You are indeed pioneers! It's like the ole west over there with money to be made in the face of great danger.

    If you can look at those pictures on drudge and still bring yourself to go... you deserve the big dollars for your brass balls.

    Those people are living in a phucked up world right now... they need honest people over there to help them... and to let them know that the basic American is not the military that they fear.

    AC

    1. Re:Hats Off by hdd · · Score: 1

      take your time...show us your ball...next thing you know, you head is on the groud...weak...

      --
      This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
    2. Re:Hats Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like the ole west over there with money to be made in the face of great danger.

      Argh, it's not like the "old west". It's like the "present, past, and future middle east".

      The middle east will always be a dangerous place for a westerner. Sprinkling some magic dust (and more than a few bombs) will not undo the difference between their society and ours.

    3. Re:Hats Off by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      and to let them know that the basic American is not the military that they fear.

      Tell that to the Iraqi citizens who have been tortured by American civilian contractors in Abu Ghraib.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    4. Re:Hats Off by acro-god · · Score: 1

      Better to be tortured by a leash and a polaroid than have your friggin head cut off...

    5. Re:Hats Off by VilePSU2 · · Score: 1

      It wasn't exactly torture anyway. Humiliation, yes. Torture, not from what I've seen so far.

    6. Re:Hats Off by VilePSU2 · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, It's not even torture. More like humiliation.

    7. Re:Hats Off by acro-god · · Score: 1

      yep... exactly... That's like comparing apples to ... to... um... a fucking severed head... (to put it bluntly.)

    8. Re:Hats Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it looked more like what you and your buddies do every weekend at the gay geek house.

  19. FYI Job Seekers. Surival Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1u servers can be useful as weapons in the event of an attempted abduction.

    Steps to avoid abduction.

    1.) Yank server out of cabinet
    2.) Lift server over head
    3.) Strike assailent with server.
    4.) Repeat as necessary

    1. Re:FYI Job Seekers. Surival Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Really now, what makes you think that a slashdoter, most of whom have never seen the outside of their parents basement, could even possibly lift a server over their heads?

    2. Re:FYI Job Seekers. Surival Tips by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 1

      Blade server
      And its a deadly weapon!

    3. Re:FYI Job Seekers. Surival Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A WMD, mayhap? It can massively damage the minds of those it comes in contact with...... Quick, phone the Pentagon!

    4. Re:FYI Job Seekers. Surival Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you dumbass. It's the old IBM keyboard. The geek isn't going to do anything that harm his collection of gay midget porn.

  20. Why would you chance it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you play the lottery, you are less likely to win than to be killed in those places, but if you win you will get a whole lot more money. Uhm... I'm going to bed.

  21. money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can't spend it if your head gets cut off

    1. Re:money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't spend it if your head gets cut off

      Here's a buck 4 ya -->> $1.00.

      Now prove it fucker!

  22. Life isn't safe by jhoger · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can die anywhere you are at any time for any number of reasons. Like that Northen Exposure episode where the satellite falls on the guy... What's your likelihood of being abducted by terrorists in Saudi Arabia? Not very high. Even if you are there. Certainly not relative to any other of a number of ways you could die.

    You can lock yourself up in your house if you want to. It just depends on how you want to live.

    If you are really concerned about your life being out of control and in the hands of terrorists, just get fitted with one of those poison teeth. Then at least you can save yourself from suffering while you die.

    Myself, I don't spend any time worrying about it.

  23. BROADBAND WAR!!! by Tekkanano · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When you're fighting for broadband, it's always a WAR!

  24. I did... by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I had the chance to work in Johannesburg. At the time it was "the most dangerous city in the world outside of a war zone." I was there for 4 months, and it was one of the best experiences of my life. While there, my co-worker was on a contract on New York. This was around 9-11... He saw the towers fall in person. You can die anyplace. Be careful, take precautions, be aware, and you have a better chance. Do the math... How many people have been killed in New York in the last 6 months? The risks may be higher in the mid-east, but how much higher? Especially with you watching everything around you?

    1. Re:I did... by konfoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry bud, Johannesburg does not count as a dangerous working environment. Its the same like working in LA - the burbs are much removed from the ghetto.

      I say this having been born in south africa, living in Johannesburg, working in malaysia, and living now in LA.

    2. Re:I did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right? You can't seriously be comparing Iraq to Johannesburg. If you are -- get a fucking head exam.

      Johannesburg is a normal city. I have a couple of friends there. Iraq, on the other hand, is no doubt the most dangerous place for Americans on the planet right now. Wake up!

    3. Re:I did... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Which is the most dangerous and which is the safest amongst the three?

      I met a South African who said to never stop at traffic lights when driving in town after dark. Which part of SA would he be referring to?

      --
    4. Re:I did... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Agreed with the others, the comparison between Johannesburg and Baghdad just doesn't hold water. My good friend is in Iraq right now, working for the CPA, about to start working for the US Embassy. One of the guys in his office (Ministry of Interior, CPA), a 22 year old kid, was hit 4 or 5 times and almost killed a week or two ago when his SUV was shot up as he returned to the Green Zone. Several others have had "near misses", and they have incoming artillery or rockets to the palace compound every day or two. When they leave the GZ, they wear full body armor and tote assault rifles. Several people to an SUV, rifles hanging out the windows, safeties flicked off when a suspicious car gets too close.


      I've been in some crappy neighborhoods, had friends mugged or beaten up, here in New York, when I lived in Ft. Lauderdale, and so on. These places can be dangerous, and I've heard Johannesburg, Mexico City and the lot can be much worse. And actually, aside from 9-11, I haven't known anybody who's died by an act of random violence in New York, and I don't even know anybody that's been robbed or mugged since Giuliani was elected mayor. In any case, there's dangerous, then there's just fucking crazy.

    5. Re:I did... by singelet · · Score: 1

      The implication that Johannesburg is anything like Iraq is insulting. I live in Johannesburg and find it quite safe thank you. We managed to hold the world summit on sustainable resources and hosted the world's leaders fine. We will also be hosting the Soccer Wolrd Cup (albeit not in Johannesburg) thank you very much!

    6. Re:I did... by jimknock · · Score: 1

      The comparison is not between Johannesburg and IRAQ. Johannesburg was chosen as an example of a place that some people consider dangerous. It could have been Rome, New York, Istanbul or Chicago. Anyway, I have lots of offers in NYC for 25% to 50% above normal rates. I wouldn't go there because of the challenge of living there. I wouldn't go to Tokyo for the same reason. The issue of taking a job for money is much more important. Why act like a prostitute? If you have a life, a carreer, a profession, you need to take a job because of the challenge or the opportunities for growth. If you want to make lots of money, find an appropriate profession. Go sell stocks, drugs, realestate, your body or your soul.

    7. Re:I did... by konfoo · · Score: 1

      I would say you can lose your life equally in all three if you make the wrong turn or go around ignorantly. But thats the difference between these and Iraq. In Iraq you can just as equally get capped in a 'westerner suburb'. Your friend would probably be referring to places like downtown Johannesburg or other such areas. I wouldn't go so far as to say never stop at traffic lights but I would say never drive around anywhere without your doors locked and scope out the intersection and the cars around it when you come up on it. Be aware of your surroundings. If you do that and keep out of certain areas you should be fine.

    8. Re:I did... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'll appreciate this story then. A mate of mine was a journalist in Lebanon covering some pretty bad stuff in the early 90s. While he was in the basement with some of his colleagues sheltering from the latest rocket attack on their hotel he mentioned that his next assignment was to Johannesburg. As one the others said: "Johannesburg! Are you crazy?"

      Joburg (where I live now) is like any big city in the US or Europe (and I've been to a few): good areas, dodgy areas and absolute no-go areas. Even Lagos can be OK if you know what you're doing.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    9. Re:I did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rome, New York, Istanbul, Chicago... dangerous? Hahahaha. You appear to have been misled by the mass media.

      As for the "challenge" of living here in New York, well, I can see how hicks like you might think it's challenging to find parking spaces here. Hint: Ditch the ratty old Chevy pickup.

      But perhaps you were referring to the challenge of finding a good restaurant, because there's only a few thousands to choose from. Or the challenge of getting groceries or anything else you could want delivered to your door. Yes, these are BIG problems here.

      Stop glamorizing your backwards lifestyle out in the boonies.

  25. I recommend you to forget it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its highly recommended to forget it, because you are on the list of targets (your type specifically), there is no money on earth that can give you your life back, nor do you take any money to the other side whatever you consider it be.

    And be sure if it was my country that was in the situation of afghanistan, iraq or saudi, I would most probably be out hunting or helping hunters, and im quite an average joe.

  26. What ARE you thinking? by malus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    NO NO No and more no.

    You are not a target for some whack-job and their Whoopie-knife. Keep your head right where it belongs, atop your shoulders.

    Greed, quite literally, KILLS these days.

  27. Whatever happened to the Army Corps Of Engineers? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought the whole point of having an Army Corps Of Engineers was so that when technical skills were needed in a war zone, the Army would be able to provide them.

  28. Don't by nailchipper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Greed is a dangerous thing. And now, you can die for it. Make a risky business move, do something that hasn't been done before and see where that takes you. Don't risk risk your life.

    Actually, do if you want. I wouldn't.

    --


    what is nailchipper?
  29. pics by Phrack · · Score: 5, Informative

    see this gallery of a contractor's 1year stint in afghanistan.

    http://www.darchiver.com/gallery/Vince

    well, some personal pics in there as well. skip those.

    --
    Dump the IRS - http://www.fairtax.org
    1. Re:pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no pr0n?

      I'll pass.

    2. Re:pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some better pics from operation iraqi freedom and shortly thereafter.

      http://www.hacksrus.com/~recompiler/drnate/index .h tm

  30. Hazard Pay by Geminus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know of several former coworkers who are there right now. You can chech out two of their websites here and here. I have been approached by these companies as well, and my expedited passport ($188.00) should be here next week. $120K/yr is too enticing for me to pass this up. Additionally, if you're doing IT work and are worried about danger, pick Kuwait as it is the safest environment. I'm married with two kids, and this certainly seems like a good option for mom to finally have a house. Keep in mind that the captured contractors mostly put themselves in danger by being in open public areas... IT guys are very well protected, probably because they are required to have an active secret clearance.

    1. Re:Hazard Pay by microTodd · · Score: 1

      I don't want to sound like a snob, but is 120K/year all they are offering? The mean salaries for a reasonably experienced SysAdmin is in the 70s-80s (http://newweb.sage.org/salsurv/). Is 40K more really that much? Its not like you could come back after a year and suddenly buy a new house with cash or anything.

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    2. Re:Hazard Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A guy who doesn't have a passport (and by extension) has probably never left the country is secoond guessing captured contractors... great.

      And $120k a year that's nothing to write home about. I've made more than that just contracting in Colombia, which wil dangerous is waaay less dangerosus than many parts of the middle east are right now.

    3. Re:Hazard Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that being out of the US for a certain amount of time, you get SIGNIFICANT breaks in the taxes.

    4. Re:Hazard Pay by Daniel+Wood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Considering most of the jobs are tax free, it is a good chunk of change.

    5. Re:Hazard Pay by Geminus · · Score: 1

      $120K is the average starting pay... If you do work in Iraq, the going rate is about $170K. In a time where you have thousands of MCSEs out of work and some working in expensive California for far less than $40K... $120K isn't starting to look so bad, especially considering that the average home here in San Diego is $500K

    6. Re:Hazard Pay by microTodd · · Score: 1

      I always hear this when I'm reading stories about working overseas, but since I've never done it I don't totally understand it. So if you work overseas it works out differently on your 1040? If an American company pays you don't you just fill out a W-2 like everyone else? What is the "enormous tax break" that you get? Anyone with experience know?

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    7. Re:Hazard Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's a tax break for active duty serving in a war zone. In a war zone designated by executive order, you have to serve at least one day out of one month to benefit from federal tax exclusion for that month.
      Contractors also have income tax exclusions up to a certain pay amount but I don't have the details.

    8. Re:Hazard Pay by acro-god · · Score: 1

      from what I've heard (from my brother who used to work in Saudi Arabia a couple of years ago, if you're working out of the country for more than like 9 or 10 months out of the year... the whole year is tax free... so... in other words... you could even sometimes work almost 8 months in saudi for the big bucks... then fly to Jamaica for the remainder of the year... and take a vacation for a couple of months... the money you'ld make in keeping your taxes would MORE than pay for the cost of the Jamaican Vacation... not too shabby...

    9. Re:Hazard Pay by natebow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      here is the deal the tax break, only applies if you spend 330 days in a 365 day period out of the states. Also the tax free is only on the first 80K, It still works out pretty good, depending on where you are and what your company policyies are. You also need to factor in Perdiem which is 94 dollars a day in Kuwait + logding. some companies pay a flat rate of 10k permonth for vehicles housing and food, actual cost to live pretty comfortablyis only about 3,500 to 4,000 all perdiem is tax free also. based on my experience you could expect to clear 140,000 - 230,000 for a year.

    10. Re:Hazard Pay by acro-god · · Score: 1

      wow... you said it better than me... said it like a true cpa... or contract employee...

    11. Re:Hazard Pay by natebow · · Score: 1

      you could say that I have aquired a good bit of expertise in that area in the last 18 months.

    12. Re:Hazard Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax free, but only up to $80,000 for US contractors. Referred to as Foreign Earned Income. You also must be outside the US for 330 days out of 365 days, but can split the 365 up over 2 years and claim a percentage of the 80000 depending on how many days you were outside the US during that tax year.
      http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/interna tional/ article/0,,id=97130,00.html
      http://www.irs.gov/pu b/irs-pdf/p54.pdf

    13. Re:Hazard Pay by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      That's why you need to move north of SD. I live in the tiny town of Wildomar (near Murietta) and don't mind the 35 minute drive into work in Rancho Bernardo.

      I recently saw a 3 bedroom/2 bath condo listed to rent for $1590. I pay about $100 less than that for exactly twice as much. Well, I get more if you count square feet.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    14. Re:Hazard Pay by ztwilight · · Score: 1

      This is silly. IT guys in silicon valley can make that much, still be with their families, AND not risk being the next headless Iraqi horseman.

      --
      Who moved my sig?
    15. Re:Hazard Pay by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

      $120K/yr is too enticing for me to pass this up.

      Dude, renegotiate your contract ASAP! Unless you are using "IT Guy" as an euphemism for "PC Assembly," you can find that kind of pay back in the states without running the risk of orphaning your kids.

    16. Re:Hazard Pay by eabell · · Score: 1

      I definitely recommend checking with a tax lawyer (or at least post on slashdot, hey, we're all lawyers here!) for tax advice, so you don't get screwed over. Do not assume that this works the same as it does for enlisted soldiers! Because it doesn't.

      I have a friend working as a civilian contractor in Afghanistan, and he looked into it and was told the same story: 330 days out of a 365 day period, but from what he said, it's not necessarily a calendar year (i.e., if you leave in March, you're not screwed for two years).

      I also have a friend on a navy ship, enlisted, and it's different. For them, one day in either a war zone or 'imminent danger zone' (I think that's the phrase he used) means their pay for the month is tax-free. It's a big deal to him because their navy ship was supposed to cross the imaginary line into tax-free land a few days before the end of this month. A typhoon is possibly delaying that. He's real anxious to cross because he wants the extra pay for the month!

    17. Re:Hazard Pay by Carbonite · · Score: 1

      ...you can find that kind of pay back in the states

      Where can you find that kind of pay? I doubt that many IT guys can just renegotiate a pay raise up to $120,000. If it was true that you could easily find $120K in the US, then companies would have to pay a whole lot more in Iraq.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    18. Re:Hazard Pay by natebow · · Score: 1

      you are correct, it is just a 330 day period not attached to any FY or calander year. Yea, all the service members have to do is spend 1 day of a month in a Combat Zone and they get tax-free, and hazardous duty for the month. Pretty good deal for them, but they deserve it.

  31. I'd do it by swimmar132 · · Score: 1

    If I weren't so hard-of-hearing, and getting married in a month, and had the right technical skills, I'd go down there.

    There's been what, two contractors killed/kidnapped? Out of how many thousands that are there? Those are pretty good odds. I face greater odds of death driving to work each day.

    1. Re:I'd do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry to wake you up, but the whole point of using contractors is to not having to report their deaths, unlike military personnel. There are a lot more contractors being killed, it's just not being reported.
      Only the really gruesome cases like the 4 charred bodies in Falluja, or recently the abductions and beheadings make it to the evening news. In case of the abductions the media attention is guarantued because of the homemade-videos (always something the media jumps on).

      Flamebait:
      As a non-american, I am kinda surprised about the outrage in the US, considering that there are currently 125+ investigations of prisoner deaths killed in US custody going on. Looks as if the US is still winning ...

    2. Re:I'd do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole point of using contractors is to not having to report their deaths

      BS. Contractors are there to fill positions which would otherwise keep active duty personnel from doing their jobs in security operations. For example, contractors are in construction, supply, mess hall, transport, ect.
      So contractors are really just the tradesmen - "butchers, bakers, and candlemakers".

    3. Re:I'd do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google 'contractor deaths in iraq' turned up 'about 50 dead' (as of May) and many injured, and the government does not officially track contractor casualties.

  32. I would go. by greywar · · Score: 1

    Definately. Give me a good life insurance policy, and good pay. in the end my family is OK either way. And for me...thats the bottom line. Right now-what if I get sick? my family would be destitute, what good would I be? A good insurance policy and good pay would guarentee my family a income. Yeah it would be nice for em to be around, but really....its all about the money.

    1. Re:I would go. by ericpearl · · Score: 1

      do life insurance policies pay when you intentionally enter a war zone?

  33. Blood Money by sakusha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please consider the moral issues that derive from making money off a war and its reconstruction. Do you want to be part of the military-industrial complex, to join the likes of Haliburton or Kellog, Brown & Root? Do you want to be a war profiteer?

    1. Re:Blood Money by PerlMonkey · · Score: 1

      Ummm...when you put it that way, Mr. Strawman, I'd have to say - YES!

    2. Re:Blood Money by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I think we've already established that he does, he's just wondering how dangerous it is.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    3. Re:Blood Money by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Lesse... perhaps if (as is likely) the industries involved are basic infrastructure... sounds very moral.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    4. Re:Blood Money by Danathar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who's "moral issues" are we talking about? His or YOURS!

    5. Re:Blood Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    6. Re:Blood Money by big+tex · · Score: 1

      F-in A.

      The military-industrial complex gets all of the best toys.

      No, seriously, war profiteering used to be the main reason for wars. (see: Khan, Genghis; Bonaparte, Napoleon) The fact that it has moved to side effect over the years is a good trend. These things don't just stop.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    7. Re:Blood Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you a fucking penis? ARE YOU??

    8. Re:Blood Money by TheUglyAmerican · · Score: 1

      Ummm, do you even know what Haliburton does?

      --
      "Written on the pages is the answer to the never ending story..."
    9. Re:Blood Money by martinde · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it moral to not rebuild the infrastructure of societies in need of rebuilding? Is it somehow more moral to bomb the crap out of them and leave them in squalor than it would be to bomb the crap out of them and then help rebuild? (Given that we have already bombed the crap out of them, you can't say we shouldn't.)

      I think the immorality of the companies you list would be in falsely charging US taxpayers for things that they did not do, not the simple fact that they are rebuilding Iraq for a price. If they were doing it at a fair rate there would be no moral issue at all in my mind.

      Establishing a fair rate is an interesting problem on days like today when a contractor's head gets cut off for no apparent reason. What sort of hourly rate do you need to put yourself in that position? Perhaps we should be civil enough to rebuild Iraq for free, but if noone qualified signs up for that job, is it immoral to do it at an hourly rate? An interesting question...

    10. Re:Blood Money by acro-god · · Score: 1

      um... how is it blood money? you're doing a service as a benefit FOR the country... not selling guns... ESPECIALLY if it's setting up their internet or computer networks... why would you NOT get paid accordingly? 12 bucks an hour ain't SHIT if I have to dodge a bullet to and from work... hell, I have to do THAT in New Orleans as it is... but at least they don't cut your friggin head off cause I'm wearing a "I *heart* NY" shirt... hell...

    11. Re:Blood Money by guet · · Score: 1

      "a contractor's head gets cut off for no apparent reason"

      He built helicopters for killing people, he's American/Western, he's in Saudia Arabia.

      There's three reasons which are very apparent to me. Perhaps we should have been civil enough to rebuild Afghanistan (for free or not), but it appears that's yesterday's war, and the west doesn't need any bases there.

      If you disagree with the war there, yes I think it is immoral to accept a lot of money from the US to 'rebuild', because there are a lot of people in Iraq who need the money. Unfortunately the US seems to prefer to pay their own people rather than hire anyone Iraqi (which would help the economy over there, but not the US economy).

    12. Re:Blood Money by Grail · · Score: 1

      Since the money comes from the American taxpayer, count me in!

      Don't forget that there is other work out there that isn't simply rebuilding infrastructure that various Presidents Bush have ordered demolished by military attack. There's health care workers needed and civil engineers required to build brand new buildings. There's oil workers required to keep sucking the black oil out of the ground to keep feeding the energy addiction of the western world. And don't forget the IT, maths, economics and language teachers that will be required for the countries in that area to drag themselves into the 21st Century.

      In the meantime, I'm saving up for immigration to New Zealand, where there is no "Free Trade" agreement with the USA, and copyright laws are sane.

      It's kinda funny, you know. There was a book I read as a kid, about these mutant children. One of them (the youngest) was a powerful telepath, and was contacted by another telepath from "Sealand", the last place on Earth where people were sane and mutants were accepted as a fact of life. How life imitates art.

    13. Re:Blood Money by wrongnumber · · Score: 0

      ...pussy...
      its ppl like you who would sit around until these maniacs come over here and do what they do every day in israel...

    14. Re:Blood Money by ksheff · · Score: 1

      What if he's working for some acronym agency of the UN or something else? I guess you want to leave Iraq the way it is instead of trying to make it better.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    15. Re:Blood Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that would make more of the people happy and less apt to start blowing stuff up now wouldn't it? Maybe it's a training/skills issue? Saddam kept most of Iraqi society stuck in the 70s. How are they going to be of any help setting up a modern communications network other than doing grunt manual labor?

    16. Re:Blood Money by $kr1p7_k177y · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you.

      BTW, I'm on my way over to destroy your house with a bulldoze. Being the nice guy I am, however, I'll stick around to help you rebuild it for $20/hour

    17. Re:Blood Money by jacoby · · Score: 1

      Well, if that bulldozing takes care of the rats and the poisonous spiders that have taken over the house and eaten the children, it's a small price to pay.

    18. Re:Blood Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These companies didn't spring into existence after the U.S. invaded Iraq. They were there before, they knew they could make enormous profits if U.S. invaded. So they had a huge incentive to help bring about such an invasion. Combine that with the fact that the persons responsible for deciding to invade have the closest ties with these companies, and they and their families and business associates will makes billions from the reconstruction, and it is utter naivety not to question the causal connections.

      Now are you telling me it's a happy coincidence that, in addition to bringing "freedom" to Iraq these people will profit financially?

      I think the immorality lies obviously in deciding to take the coutnry to war to pursue financial gain and an extreme, fundamentalist ideology.

      The fact that they increase their profits by overbilling is so blatantly corrupt that I'm not surprised they haven't made a bigger deal about it on Capitol Hill.

    19. Re:Blood Money by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should have been civil enough to rebuild Afghanistan

      Jeeeeezus Christ. Crack a newspaper once in a while. President Karzai was in Washington just last week talking about how much work is being done by US-based companies and organizations. In particular, he talked about how many roads are being built. He talked about it in the context of saying how many more are needed, but the point is that they're getting built, and they're getting built largely with USAID dollars.

      Unfortunately the US seems to prefer to pay their own people rather than hire anyone Iraqi

      The US isn't doing any hiring in Iraq at all, except on a very small scale. The US hasn't even had an official presence in Iraq for nearly two weeks now, and what unofficial presence remains is being packed up to be shipped out come the 30th.

      You really need to try paying attention to the world around you. When you, you know, whine incessantly about stuff that isn't actually true at all, you just end up looking like a putz.

      --

      I write in my journal
    20. Re:Blood Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, and profit by the 1% fee that Halliburton gets on their support contract in Iraq?

      With war profiteering like that, everyone will stay back in Silicon Valley looking for the usual 15% ROI, if not hoping for a 1000% return from a longshot startup.

    21. Re:Blood Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Please consider the moral issues that derive from making money off a war and its reconstruction. Do you want to be part of the military-industrial complex, to join the likes of Haliburton or Kellog, Brown & Root? Do you want to be a war profiteer?
      As opposed to what? Making money off of so-called "peace" , to join the likes of France, Germany and Russia? If I had to choose, I'd choose the side whose actions at least resulted in the liberation of people from a murderous dictator.

      Compare the estimated annual death toll of a Saddam-led Iraq with a Coalition-led Iraq. I dare you. Far fewer Iraqis have died -- even during the heaviest combat periods -- than during a typical year under Hussein.

      "Blood money" my ass.
    22. Re:Blood Money by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      It's not as black-and-white as you paint. Although I don't agree with the stated reasons of the war, it's better than the almost ten years of economic blockage of almost anything. It rendered Iraq from a nice going nation into poverty. So, what is bad about this guy helping them up?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    23. Re:Blood Money by ztwilight · · Score: 1
      Please consider the moral issues that derive from making money off a war and its reconstruction. Do you want to be part of the military-industrial complex, to join the likes of Haliburton or Kellog, Brown & Root? Do you want to be a war profiteer?

      What moral issues are you referring to? You actually think it's immoral to help rebuild a country which wants nothing less than it's freedom? You think it's immoral to risk your life going to Iraq to do so? I don't know what kind of sick propaganda the media has been feeding you, but it's apparent you've become VERY brainwashed by it.

      --
      Who moved my sig?
    24. Re:Blood Money by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Afgan part is real interesting to me because I have a friend over there now setting internet connections for small villages and the like... This is his second "tour" so to speak too...

      Not rebuilding? Yeah right.... Too much good news in Afgan, let's look for something more sensational.

    25. Re:Blood Money by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "what unofficial presence remains is being packed up to be shipped out come the 30th."

      Aahh, exactly what "presence" is this that is leaving the 30th?

      I'm sure the 150,000 US troops over there who ain't going anywhere for the next couple years - unless of course Sistani says different in due time - would like to know they're coming home on the 30th. Other than in bodybags, of course.

      Moron.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    26. Re:Blood Money by 5ynic · · Score: 1

      Be quick. Non Nuclear status is "out by lunchtime on day 1" if national gets into power in NZ, and negotiations are well underway for a FTA with (of all the child-labour using, currency-deflating dictatorships...) China! Still nice here in NZ though. :)

      --
      ceci n'est pas un sig
    27. Re:Blood Money by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 0

      Aahh, exactly what "presence" is this that is leaving the 30th?

      The last few unofficial Coalition Governing Authority advisors.

      I'm sure the 150,000 US troops over there who ain't going anywhere for the next couple years

      It's 138,000. And that's right: they'll be there as long as it's necessary to maintain security.

      Moron.

      Fuck you, you lying pile of shit. You spew off about matters of which you KNOW NOTHING, and then you have the audacity to call SOMEBODY ELSE a moron? Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

      --

      I write in my journal
    28. Re:Blood Money by $kr1p7_k177y · · Score: 1

      Isn't it for the homeowner to decide when to demolish hiw own house?

    29. Re:Blood Money by PsibrII · · Score: 1

      Hmm, exploit people, play with guns in the sun, and get paid buckets of cash ? Sounds like a plan or GTA vice city. ;)

      You also have to factor in just how many people love playing that game, some so much that they tried taking it into the real world.

      Only a tiny portion of the population have the right mis-sequences of DNA to be fluffy bunny hugging nader voting commie vegans.

      The rest of the population needs an outlet for those energies. What better way to channel them than to use their energies to cancel out those of knuckleheads in nations who we need so many hundred of supertankers in oil from a month ?

      But if you want to see something real ugly, wait until we have a serious nationwide disruption of oil flow, and some batch of nader voting commie vegans is protesting the opening of a new reactor. If they are lucky the cops will drag them off before the rednecks with pipes and broken bottles gets to them.

    30. Re:Blood Money by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You're a real rocket scientist /,'er, aren't you?

      A few US advisors leave and the largest US Embassy in the world moves in - and you can't comprehend that.

      The troop count including the British and others is going to be 150,000 when the rotation finishes - you can't comprehend that either, right?

      And you figure 150,000 US troops means there is no US "presence" in Iraq after the 30th - even though Bremer and the others remain in command of virtually everything.

      Yes, you are a spewing sack of shit moron yourself.

      Have a nice day, rightwing cretin.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    31. Re:Blood Money by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      A few US advisors leave and the largest US Embassy in the world moves in - and you can't comprehend that.

      Heh. Wanna hear something funny? Right now I'm sitting about forty feet away from Robin Wright. Why is this funny? Because she's the one who wrote that Washington Post story you're referring to.

      The troop count including the British and others is going to be 150,000 when the rotation finishes - you can't comprehend that either, right?

      Why do you keep getting numbers wrong? It's 138,000.

      And you figure 150,000 US troops means there is no US "presence" in Iraq after the 30th - even though Bremer and the others remain in command of virtually everything.

      Seems like we need to take a second and remember what we're talking about here. I mean, assuming you can wrap your head around basic ideas. Basic idea #1: an idiot upthread said that the US was hiring Americans instead of Iraqis to rebuild Iraq. The US isn't hiring anybody. There is no official US presence in Iraq to do any hiring. Yes, there are Coalition troops, but they don't hire people, do they?

      Am I going too fast for you?

      Mr. Bremer hasn't been in charge of anything since June 5. His official capacity was dissolved on that day. He remains in Baghdad as the chief United States diplomat to the Iraqi Interim Government. On July 1, he'll go home and be replaced by Mr. Negroponte.

      Should I slow down? Is your tiny little head spinning?

      --

      I write in my journal
    32. Re:Blood Money by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You have to be completely insane.

      Nothing you've said is even remotely true.

      Troop Count:

      The Pentagon will increase the number of U.S. troops in Iraq to around 145,000 this summer, from the current 140,000, in recognition of the continued difficulty coalition forces are having in providing security leading up to the hand-over of political power to Iraqis on June 30.

      The new troops will come from the Marine Corps, which will move up a deployment originally planned for this fall and send 5,000 Marines to Iraq by August. The first troops in that contingent ? 2,200 Marines from the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit ? have already left their home base in San Diego for Iraq. The remainder will come from the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit in North Carolina.

      Overall, U.S. force levels in Iraq could rise even higher than 145,000 as Marines already in Iraq have their tours extended to overlap with incoming replacements, said Lt. Gen. Robert Magnus, deputy commandant for programs and resources.

      What part of higher than 145,000 can't you read? I said 150,000 after the rotation is done. The above confirms that.

      No official US presence in Iraq? What planet are you on?

      The US isn't hiring anybody? Excuse me? You've never heard of Halliburton or Brown and Root? You need to go here and see the list of PMO awarded contracts. You think it's all Iraqis doing this work? Are you nuts?

      Bremer's no longer in authority as of June 5th? Then why on June 8th:

      Moqtada al-Sadr, the radical Shia leader whose militiamen have been fighting the US occupation forces in several Iraqi cities, was banned yesterday from standing in Iraq's forthcoming democratic elections.

      Paul Bremer, the US administrator in Iraq, signed an order stating that, with immediate effect, members of illegal militias "will be barred from holding political office for three years after leaving their illegal organisation".

      And here's the facts from the horse's mouth about the Embassy from Dan Senor, Senior Adviser, CPA, DOD Briefing, Tuesday, June 15, 2004:

      MR. SENOR: On your first question, obviously, we need substantial space, property, for the U.S. mission here. This will be the largest -- one of the largest U.S. missions in the world -- I briefed on that over the weekend -- close to a thousand U.S. employees, close to 600 to 700 Foreign Service nationals. The largest USAID mission in the world will be here. And the Iraqi interim government recognizes that if we are to continue to play the role here that they are hoping we will play going forward, we will need not only the requisite property from which to operate, but in an area that enables us to maximize, to the extent that we can, the security of our U.S. citizens working here. And so we are going to work out with the interim government -- and this has been the basis of discussions that Ambassador Bremer has had with Prime Minister Allawi as to what's basically made available. Certainly nobody intends to use space permanently. It's just a matter of what we can use here in the near future that meets the criteria that we've laid out, and the prime minister has been receptive to that.

      Q Where's the embassy going to be then?

      MR. SENOR: It's going to be within the current Green Zone. And we will be -- certainly when Ambassador Negroponte arrives -- but Ambassador Jeffrey, who's the deputy chief of mission who's already here, will be, I think, providing some tours to the press and providing information to show you the facilities that we will be using. The current idea, the current plan is to use the existing CPA headquarters as, effectively, some office space for the embassy, sort of an annex, if you will. And then the actual main embassy building will be in a different location nearby, but within the perimeter of the current Green Zone.

      Anything else you want to know?

      You'e simply and totally clueless about anything going on in Iraq, aren't you?

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    33. Re:Blood Money by jacoby · · Score: 1

      They did, or at least some of them did, when we took back the neighboring house from the Rat King. We didn't help them then, to our undying shame.

  34. Recent Episode of Thsi American Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd recommend you listen to the 06/06/2004 episode of This American Life which devotes an entire hour to stories of civilian contractors and mercs in Iraq. I believe it would answer your questions and you should be able to download it for free from http://www.thislife.org/

  35. depends on the package (free granades, AKs...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the position comes with an adequate arsenal,
    i'd go for it (the only problem with military i have is that they own your ass, so a contract is never as long as you thought)

    BTW - yes, i am a geek, and yes I am a killer ;)

  36. Depends upon the security arrangements by Stalke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First let me state that I personally have no first hand experience in a situation like this, except that when I was a kid growing up my father was a similar contractor and, since this was the seventies, my family was dragged along as well. That never happens anymore. But I was in Iraq in 1979 before the Iran-Iraq war and remember leaving just before the war broke out. Right now my father is in a similar situation about a job in Indonesia where the company is currently facing people leaving (ironically I was born at that same jobsite).

    Okay. It depends upon the security arrangements. First of all working in a second or third world country is very cool. There's nothing like the culture shock while at the same time being an expert compared to most people around you. Second, there is a big difference between having to work outside a secure compound and working inside the compound. If your inside the compound, changes are you'll spend most of your time there is a pretty secure environment and the only time you'll leave is to go on vacation to Dubai or someplace like that and have a significantly better chance at meeting some rich heiress that if you worked in the states.

    One the other hand, if you're working outside a secure compound (like for example as a civil or petrolium engineer), make sure your paid well. While you'll still be pretty secure, you never know what'll happen. That being said, when they say that contractors are being targetting, they really are talking about security contractors who are ex navy seal types.

    --
    -?-
  37. Up to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a civilian contractor, I know several civilian government personell who have gone to Iraq for 2 weeks or so to do a specific job. From their reports, it isn't too terrible, as long as you say within the fortified military establishments that are designated for civilian contractors. The two Americans that have been kidnapped have been outside those areas for extended periods of time.

    In the end, it's all up to you and what you think you are accomplishing. My personal choice is to not do it, but ultimately it is your choice.

  38. Go to the Balkans by karniv0re · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently got back from Kosovo (though I was there with the Army, not a contractor unfortunately). It's safe enough to hang out in town during the days, and the pay is still pretty good. It was rumored that some Brown & Root employees were making $80k for sitting in a watch tower. I'm sure IT guys would bank better than that.

    As far as the Middle East, I think you could remain pretty safe if you just kept to yourself and didn't do too much playing around outside of the base.

    On a related note, I would like to see a comparison of the daily murder rate in Iraq compared to the daily murder rate for an inner-city such as, oh, let's say Detroit. Granted, beheading is a bit worse than a drive-by, but it's not like it's an every-day thing.

    1. Re:Go to the Balkans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's disgusting about the Balkans is the number of US contractors contributing to the sex slave trade.

    2. Re:Go to the Balkans by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      As far as the Middle East, I think you could remain pretty safe if you just kept to yourself and didn't do too much playing around outside of the base.

      My buddy in Saudi lives literally jut down the street frm the complex that was attacked a few weeks ago. His girlfriend (South African) lives in the apartment build right next to the one where the cops jumped out of the chopper. We were swapping IM's as it was going down.

      Both guarded housing complexes.

      He is bailing out soon

      Even the complexes with armed guards aren't safe.

      As far as comparison to downtown Detroit...would you live there voluntarily, for a good salary?

    3. Re:Go to the Balkans by setzman · · Score: 1

      Where do you apply for these jobs?

      --
      C:\>
    4. Re:Go to the Balkans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can buy sex slaves there?!!!
      where do i sign up?

    5. Re:Go to the Balkans by VilePSU2 · · Score: 1

      At least someone has a chance to survive a drive-by.

    6. Re:Go to the Balkans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I've lived in detroit. Yes, I've easily mad over 100k in a year. Watching the likes of kb&r screw over my government, no thanks.

    7. Re:Go to the Balkans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's disgusting about the Balkans is the number of US contractors contributing to the sex slave trade.

      And German tourists, and UK contractors, and Japanese tourists in SE Asia, and even Indian apartment building owners in Berkeley California-

      Go fuck yourself. Pigs contributing to the sex slave trade come from all nationalities and are all over the world.

    8. Re:Go to the Balkans by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      My buddy is getting 75k tax free working in a warehouse.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  39. Are other people's experiences that relevant? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's your life. If you feel comfortable about being in a situation where your chances of losing your life increase dramatically, and if you think that you're being adequately compensated for the risks that you're taking, then go ahead and take the assignment.

    But if possibly becoming a target, or even being the unfortunate victim of a friendly fire incident, makes your stomach churn then don't do it.

    These are warzones that you're talking about. Don't step into one because someone else says that they'd do it, step into one because you know that you're comfortable doing it. You only have one life, so don't lead it according to how someone else would lead their's.

    Bottom line: is the job worth potentially dying for? Only you can answer that for yourself.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Are other people's experiences that relevant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're not necessarily dieing for the job, just dieing while doing it. The reasons you go (e.g. get money for your family) are what you would be dieing for.

  40. No, not unless you're insane by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Or you have death wish.

  41. Difficult Question by colonslashslash · · Score: 2, Funny
    So I took the liberty of asking this extremely odd-looking magic 8 ball for you.

    I'm not sure if the 8 ball is trying to tell you to avoid Iraq or stop using Microsoft Outlook. Either is sound advice in my opinion. ;)

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
  42. I wouldn't by bsd4me · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't go, even if I had the bear proof suit.

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

  43. Clerks answer by WWWAvenger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "A contractor's personal politics play heavily when choosing jobs."

    1. Re:Clerks answer by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Haha, thank you... the only reason I'm even reading the comments in this story is that Clerks was the first thing that came to mind.

  44. how do i get a job there? by gyratedotorg · · Score: 1

    funny, i was just wondering how id go about getting a job over there.

    --
    Gyrate Dot Org - "Where high-tech meets low-life"
  45. Telecommute! by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    If work can be so easily ousourced to other countries, then have those jobs your looking at 'outsourced' to you, without you having to be there physically.

    1. Re:Telecommute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why even do that? Find out what jobs are available and hire some Indian contract workers to go there on your behalf. Give them a generous 50% of the take, and they're still making probably 100x what they would at home and you're raking in the money with no risk to yourself.

  46. Get your facts straight! by PaulBu · · Score: 4, Informative

    the other guy was an Afghan POW, not Iraqi civilian.

    To contribute to the grandparent's discussion, as far as I know you are kind of supposed to know how to deal with a gun if you are a civilian contractor down there, or at least carry it. (Got the story from a lady working for one of the aerospace companies who was visiting Iraq briefly, and she told that you are given a gun to hold and at least pretend that you know how to use it).

    As to the actual 'Ask /." question -- I think that the editors are either in very-long-latency mode or entirely detached from the rest of the world. The poor guy was killed today!

    To answer the question, I guess that my wife would not let me go there...

    Paul B.

    1. Re:Get your facts straight! by KrispyKringle · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You're right that he was an Afghan and not an Iraqi, but according to ABC, ``Abdul Wali went to a U.S. base in Afghanistan on his own accord and surrendered to authorities. They suspected him of participating in rocket attacks against the base and he wanted to clear things up.''

      Whether or not he was truly a civilian, of course, remains to be seen. But given that he voluntarily surrendered in order to ``clear things up''? I give him the benefit of the doubt. At least enough to refrain from beating him to death.

    2. Re:Get your facts straight! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      No, in no way I condone beating the poor guy to death (especially since the attorney for the contractor claims that it was a heart attack), but really I did not know that he surrendered on his own. What I suspect is that both parties are of average guilt, but one got beaten up and died, the other got selected for an exemplary trial...

      Paul B.

    3. Re:Get your facts straight! by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree with you on that. And I didn't know that his attorney claims it was a heart attack (I just knew the causes of death were ``unknown'').

    4. Re:Get your facts straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the "contractor" caused the heart attack it won't matter and the fucker deserves to be locked away. I bet the guy was tied up while he was being beaten thats how these sick fucks are.

    5. Re:Get your facts straight! by pvt_medic · · Score: 0, Redundant

      gun tips if you go.
      1. Know how to use your gun
      2. Keep it loaded
      3. Dont bother with a safety
      4. Evil guy comes at you aim at his chest
      5. Pull trigger
      6. ????
      7. Profit

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    6. Re:Get your facts straight! by gantzm · · Score: 1

      4. Evil guy comes at you aim at his chest

      That's two to the chest one to the head,
      lather, rinse, repeat!

      But I think you were trying to be funny.

      --


      Excessive forking causes un-wanted children.
    7. Re:Get your facts straight! by demachina · · Score: 1

      Another interesting fact about this case is the CIA contractor is being prosecuted under the patriot act in a really disturbing interpretation and extension of its reach. It was supposed to be to charge foreign terrorists who attack U.S. government facilities oversees but they are apparently reinterpreting it to cover a U.S. citizen attacking a foreigner at a government facility over seas.

      The DOJ apparently had to stretch it this way or contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan could quite literally get away with murder. The problem:

      - Civilian contractors can be court martialled but only if congress officially declared war which it hasn't in Afghanistan or Iraq
      - There is no way the U.S. will turn its citizens, especially a CIA employee, over to Afghanistan or Iraq which are the only entities with jurisdiction
      -The U.S. has managed to exempt its citizens from prosecution by the international courts who prosecute war crimes wherever they occur. The U.S. blackmailed the U.N. in to this exemption by threatening to withdraw troops and support from peacekeeping operations in the Balkans in particular. China supported this, and helped pass it, but as of yesterday no longer will because of the obvious war crimes the U.S. is committing.
      - The DOJ doesn't normally have jurisdiction outside the U.S. though it is rapidly taking upon itself the right to prosecute anyone for crimes anywhere, the worlds first truly global police force. The Bush administration is trying or has already given the DOJ the right to prosecute U.S. citizens who commit sex crimes anywhere in the world which is another huge extension of the DOJ's power. You can no longer count on escaping the long arm of the Bush administration by moving out of the U.S.

      In an interesting twist it is quite possible the Bush administration was intentionally using civilian contractors to perform interrogations and torture, they've hired a lot of them, because they knew they couldn't be charged thanks to this long series of convenient exclusions.

      It may only be because the Bush administration is under heat to make it look like they didn't approve torture in the first place, that they've been forced to go to these new extremes to find a way to prosecute these contractors who were probably doing what the Bush administration wanted them to do in the first place when they tortured detainees.

      --
      @de_machina
    8. Re:Get your facts straight! by Zardus · · Score: 1

      The actual guy that submitted the story was killed? How can you tell? He didn't give his name in the submition.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
  47. You risk your life every day you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, the Middle East is a dangerous place right now. (Particularly for Westerners.) However, people do have a tendency of exaggerating the danger because of the context.

    For example: just a few years ago, seven people were gunned down at a computer engineering firm in Massachusetts. But if I were offered a job in Massachusetts, I doubt that questions of personal safety would even enter my mind.

    Of course I'm not saying the Middle East is safer than Massachusetts (though if it keeps you from eating at McDonald's too often, it may well be)! But don't let high profile shock stories bias your judgement too much.

    1. Re:You risk your life every day you live by Wig · · Score: 1

      Gimme a break. The Middle East is a horrible place to be right now. You have fanatics who will take you just because you're American. They don't care. And besides, who'd you rather be gunned down, or feel the pain while your head is being cut off? :)

    2. Re:You risk your life every day you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I'd much rather be decapitated than gutshot. Bullets aren't Magical Instant Painless Death Pills.

    3. Re:You risk your life every day you live by Wig · · Score: 1

      If you get shot, it hurts, but at least you might survive, the it goes numb anyway, which is why people are so damn calm while being shot. However, if you don't have a head, you're not going to live (obviously), and it's going to hurt like hell.

    4. Re:You risk your life every day you live by $kr1p7_k177y · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "Middle East" Isn't a dangerous place, although parts of it are. Two years ago, I did humanitarian work in Palestine, and the Palestinians, were so utterly thankful for my presence that I suspect some of them would have taken a bullet for me. On top of that, many of them assumed I was Jewish, but were grateful no less.

      The Israelis on the OTOH, were far less hospitable.

      Attempting to lump the middle east into one bucket is shortsighted and narrow minded. It is a place politically and ethnically diverse as Europe.

    5. Re:You risk your life every day you live by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I'd much rather get gunned down by surprise one day at my nice comfy job, rather than kidnapped, blindfolded and abused for a month or two, then watch some lunatic with a knife give my eulogy for a video camera before he gets his buddies to hold me down while I scream and he hacks my head off.

      At least what happened in Massachusetts was an anomoly. There are foreign aid workers, contractors, and of course soldiers killed in Iraq every day, and that's out of a population much smaller than that of MA.

      I'm not saying I wouldn't consider it, but I think I would at least run the numbers first.

    6. Re:You risk your life every day you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what? that was the only time anyone got killed in MA? People get killed in MA every damn day, often for very petty, selfish reasons by scum of the earth. It doesn't sound much different, now does it?

    7. Re:You risk your life every day you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's probably because they assumed that you were one of the 'useful idiots' the left in the West employs to bog down freedom everywhere. Palestinian/Israeli, it doesn't matter....they both assumed the same thing. It's just one sees you as an ally, the other an enemy.

    8. Re:You risk your life every day you live by timeOday · · Score: 1
      what? that was the only time anyone got killed in MA? People get killed in MA every damn day, often for very petty, selfish reasons by scum of the earth. It doesn't sound much different, now does it?
      Look, I think it's great that we all have respect for others, and "people are the same everywhere," and we shouldn't be stuck up, and all that. But can you honestly say that Iraq isn't an especially dangerous place to be right now, especially for a Westerner? Do you seriously believe that living in Iraq right now is a lot like living in Massachusetts? That's outright ridiculous.
    9. Re:You risk your life every day you live by gregeth · · Score: 1

      It's true that in the US and other more "stable" countries there is still crime, terrorism, etc. However, I don't know how much you can compare it with living in other countries. I personally lived in the Philippines for about 2 years. While it's definitely still not the middle east, it can be a bit shocking to go to the mall or something and see guards standing at the door with rifles or other weapons. And yes, even McDonalds had guards at it, so it's not like you're getting away from that. :)

      But really, it was quite a shock to adjust to it all. You end up realizing how good you've had it. Although as someone else mentioned earlier, most people are at least somewhat nice, but you do have to take some extra caution. For one thing, it always helps to always be with someone else, and becoming familiar with their culture and language helps, too.

      I did run into a few nervous situations, but was lucky to not be in the part of the country with the Abu Sayyaf(supposed Al Qaeda ally group) there. I was there during 9/11, and at which point you didn't want to make to much of a scene.

    10. Re:You risk your life every day you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Arab terrorists ("Palestinians") loved you because you're a Nazi. Jews aren't hospitable to Nazis for some reason. Are you part of the ISM?

    11. Re:You risk your life every day you live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it can be a bit shocking to go to the mall or something and see guards standing at the door with rifles or other weapons.

      Yes, whenever I go to the US the armed guards everywhere (malls etc) always gives me pause. It's a culture shock alright. Here the only rent-a-cops that are allowed to carry are the ones actually inside the Swedish federal reserve and the like.

    12. Re:You risk your life every day you live by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      it's going to hurt like hell.

      Not for long. :)

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    13. Re:You risk your life every day you live by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      But if I were offered a job in Massachusetts, I doubt that questions of personal safety would even enter my mind.

      Have you driven in Massachusetts?

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  48. Didn't seem so bad over there till I saw this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  49. Re:Whatever happened to the Army Corps Of Engineer by AndyChrist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought the whole point of having an Army Corps Of Engineers was so that when technical skills were needed in a war zone, the Army would be able to provide them.

    The problem with that arrangement is that if there are profits to be made from the teat of the US taxpayer (or local oil money), the Corps of Engineers cannot provide them.

  50. a note from a woman... by MariaK · · Score: 0

    If you have a wife/children, don't do it. No matter what happened to you - even if you came back after a few months with a great tan and a fat wallet - your time there would be hell for them. If you're on your own, then you'll have to decide for yourself whether you want to risk it.

  51. Re:Whatever happened to the Army Corps Of Engineer by Belisarivs · · Score: 1

    It's been outsourced . . .

  52. Darwin Award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't mean to be negative man, but if you're stupid enough to even consider going over there, then maybe you should go. You would be doing us all a favor by removing youself from the gene pool.

  53. On the whole I'm a big chicken by kfg · · Score: 1

    Nonetheless, there have been times in my life when I've risked all. Sometimes the pay was good, sometimes I was the one doing the paying.

    You see, I did them because I wanted to, not for the money. The thing itself scratched my itch.

    So there it is. If you got an email and instantly thought to yourself, "Hot Goddam Puppies! I'm going to Afghanistan. Martha, oil my AK-47. "Old Betsy" has got some work to do," well, what are you doing here asking questions for? You know you want to go. Take whatever deal they give you. Have fun. Keep your head down and wear a cup.

    That doesn't appear to be you. You want to know if it might be worth the money, to which I have just one question of my own:

    Are you frickin' NUTS???

    KFG

  54. Most important Arabic phrase to learn by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 1, Funny

    Don't shoot, I'm Canadian!

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
  55. I'm from the Private Sector, and I'm here to help by pancake_lover · · Score: 5, Informative

    This American Life (on NPR) ran a pretty good documentary on this subject a few weeks back. It's available in Realaudio format on the web. It's an hour long though. The archive page is Here. Or go to the audio directly.

    --
    Homer no function beer well without.
  56. Are you a Republican? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If so, I definitely think you should go for it...

    1. Re:Are you a Republican? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well..cuz we all know a liberal would be too much of a pussy to know how to defend himself in a stressful situation in Iraq. So just stay back with the women and children, like you always do like a good boy.

    2. Re:Are you a Republican? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Lemme see... Bush and Kerry... which one's the military hero, and which one's the draft dodger?

      Time to go browse the deck of Republican Chickenhawks.

      http://www.chickenhawkcards.com/chickenhawkcards 2. html

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  57. Those contractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those contractors were hired mercenaries recruited from the ranks of our very own special forces ($$$$$), who are not subject to international laws of the Geneva convention.

    They are flown into Kajikistan on commercial airlines such as Contenental (know one pilot) then escort their clients wherever they need to go in the region. From what I gather, one such client is Halliburton.

    That's one reason they were slaughtered, butchered, and hung from bridges in Iraq when they are captured. Of course the news shows those dangling bodies and says "poor contractors" and we are left thinking, "oh no, those poor souls trying to restore services to the Iraqis."

    You won't be any sort of contractor such as they, I wouldn't worry.

    1. Re:Those contractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It surprises me that our own guys don't cause, er, accidents for these clowns. They're making maybe $30,000, and sometimes come out in debt. They join up, knock up the first woman they meet, buy a big truck AND a big SUV and buy a mortgage, and their pay doesn't quite cut it, and they can't change jobs.

      Now you're in Iraq, guarding some asswipe who makes more in a month than you made last year, and doesn't get US income tax withheld. I would not hesitate to frag that bitch.

  58. No. by elmegil · · Score: 1
    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  59. Outsource work in Iraq, Afghanistan to Indians? by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 0

    Everyone is bitching about outsourcing of jobs to India, but this is one area where I'm sure us Indians would:

    1. Have a marked advantage (able to blend into the local population, and be less conspicuous than a white person)

    2. Americans would actually WANT for others to take their place, so they don't have to put their asses themselves on the line.

    So, how about it? Bring the business our way! :)

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
  60. Go ahead, if you want to help Bush fuck the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure they're offering you 6 digits, but for every bullet, building, and life that is spent over there, on the Bush family's pet war, makes these guys (see shadow government) a ton more wealthy (somewhere in the neighborhood of oh, 11 digits). The Bush family is profiting from this war at the expense of America and Americans.

    Your life isn't worth it
    Bush isn't worth it

  61. Is life insurance one of the bennies? by winkydink · · Score: 1

    I'm betting no as it's thousands per week (not a typo)

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  62. Do some math and don't take unnecessary risks by frambris · · Score: 1

    Besides the money (which are great to get/have/spend) I think it would be a nice experience to have worked in a such situation. And to have it on your resume wouldn't hurt when looking for other work. As others have pointed out, you could get killed slipping in you own bathtub.

    Never the less. If you go to an unstable region do see to it that you have a guide/guard with you and don't dess up like a tourist with clothes screaming "HI, EVERYBODY! I'M A FOREIGNER! PLEASE KILL ME!".

    There's two sides to having a gun. One side is the obvious that you can defend yourself. But it also makes you a target to others with guns.

    A relative of mine worked as a teacher in a high security prison. While he had his thoughts about the risks (the interns where killers, rapists and the like) he found that in the end the experience/money outweighted the risk. That's the same math you'll have to make.

    I wouldn't go only for the money.

  63. Money fades. Bullet holes don't. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a friend (USAF retired ) in Saudi now, as a contractor associated with aircraft, and he's bailing.

    Money fades. Bullet holes don't.

    1. Re:Money fades. Bullet holes don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is quite true. Even for some very well paid contractors, the work is 14+ hour days and they're saying it sucks to the max in Iraq. They'd rather be home than in Iraq even at ANY rate of pay. It just gets worse in the summer heat, or when the insurgents keep up their guerilla lawn dart tactics.

    2. Re:Money fades. Bullet holes don't. by PsibrII · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure the prospect of spending a nice warm dusty summer in saudi has nothing at all to do with it. ;) Some people can take the heat, others move to michigan and enjoy the snow.

    3. Re:Money fades. Bullet holes don't. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. After spending many summers in Spain, Turkey, Saudi, he is quite used to it.

  64. Sign me up! by tjstork · · Score: 1

    If the money is good enough, I'll take the risk.

    --
    This is my sig.
  65. Downsizing the military by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    A smaller active duty force, with the same or more work, means more and more has to be outsourced.

    We've been cutting back on the military for years.

  66. Exactly how much money is it? by Gldm · · Score: 1

    Is it enough to fix your life? Buy a house for you and your SO and a family? Maybe enough to relocate to be with an SO somewhere far away? Enough to put your kids through college? Enough to support your parents as they get older?

    It's not the money so much as what you can get with it. You're risking your life. People risk theirs every day by just crossing the street to work, the only difference here is the magnitude of the risk and payoff. As to whether the payoff is worth the risk, that really depends its size and your needs. People on here are going to scream no amount of money is enough but sometimes it is, if it ensures the things you really need in your life. But that's something unique to each person.

    If it's really good pay I might be interested in going myself. I failed out of college, and I want a second chance. I love someone who's all but homeless in a 3rd world country. My car keeps falling apart and I'm too broke to fix it. I'm sick of living at home. I could find a good use for alot of money and my IT skills are pretty good. Anyone know where you inquire about this kinda thing?

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  67. Some people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who truly hate their life, and might be quasi-suicidal, might look at it as an opportunity for drastic change, without a considerable downside.

  68. Go undercover... by sadler121 · · Score: 1

    I would go, but first I would do the following, 1) Make sure I was throughly trained in both armed and unarmed combat, 2) Learn Arabic 3) Grow a beard 4) Buy and wear clothing indicative to the area.
    Seiriously, that way I could blend into my surrondings, and as long as I made an attempt at speaking Arabic in the local accent, I wouldn't stand out nearly as bad as other contracters in jeans and a t shirt, unsaven, speaking english. It would decrease the chances of me being captured tremenusly, as the terrorists would go for the consipicious types first.

  69. Cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of you are cowards who have told him not to go. Where would the world be today if people have not taken some risks and go to a far off land. From Columbus to the Pioneers, all generations of people have taken risky and dangerous adventures to benift from. And t's not like everyone over there is getting abducted. There are thousands of foreign civilians over in Iraq today. If you stay away from alleyways and stay in groups, you should be fine. Not only is the pay good, but you will also being going over to one of the most historical and sifnificant regions of our world. Most of these people on here haven't even left their Mom's basement.

  70. Computer pukes in the military.... by ELP000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Computer stuff in the Army... is the Signals Branch. Not the Corps of Engineers.

    USAF are "Combat Communications Groups" or "Com" units suplimented with regular base level "com" people from "Communcations Squadrons" from various bases.

    Navy and Marines .... don't know.

    And of course there are some exceptions to what I just wrote.

  71. Redundant? by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

    Moderators, so only one person may send their thanks to those who put their lives in danger to help others?

    BoldAC, sorry about the redundant from whoever. Dang if mod points are never around when you need them!

    1. Re:Redundant? by BoldAC · · Score: 1

      No problem. Obviously my post was posted before the thread responses above. If you live and die by karma, you'll never enjoy slashdot. :)

      Thanks for the mention.

      AC

  72. Is it worth your life? by killermookie · · Score: 1

    My subject is very forward but true.

    A co-worker of mine is from India. We were talking about the the tension between India and Pakistan and the tragic incident of Paul Johnson when it changed to about doing contract work in the Middle East. She had mentioned how one her friends was recently offered a job in that region with pay of around $2,500 per day with a total stay of about a week.

    My eyes widened at how high the pay was...then it sort of made sense. There's a risk to your life, a possibe fatal and brutal one. We both agreed that going to the Middle East in its current state is highly dangerous. You'd have to be needing the money real bad to make such a decision.

    1. Re:Is it worth your life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You'd have to be needing the money real bad to make such a decision."

      If you don't "need the money real bad", then it really needs to be enough money to make you self-sufficient. Enough to buy a couple hundred acres in oregon, *ON* the grid, owning it outright, plus enough to build a nice house on top of it. Tax free for life, with the means to grow my own food and make my own fuel. That sort of thing might be worth 6 months in the shit.

    2. Re:Is it worth your life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You'd have to be needing the money real bad to make such a decision.

      If you were Indian like your co-worker then I doubt there's much to worry about. As long as you're not a black man or white Anglo-Saxon looking guy you're probably OK. Grow a beard and try to fit in with the towel-heads.

  73. Imagine the outcome... by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Imagine the feeling of a hand gripping your hair and pulling your head back. Imagine a dull, rusty knife sawing its way through the skin, tendon, and bone of your neck. Imagine your agonizing screams suddenly cut off as the blade penetrates your larynx. Imagine no longer being able to scream, but the agony continuing as the Muslim fanatic hacks off your head. Imagine your last sight being the video camera they're using to film your murder.

    Imagine that stuff, and realize it could very well happen to you. If you're cool with that risk, then go.

    --
    "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    1. Re:Imagine the outcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but the agony continuing as the Muslim fanatic hacks off your head...

      "fanatic"? isn't this a war? If the US kills and mutilates who knows how many iraquis you call it "mission acomplished" but if some of those guys tries to get even, doing more or less the same that you have being doing for the last year, you call him fanatic...curious...

  74. I'd go by eric76 · · Score: 1

    I'd go.

    I've thought about working in Saudi Arabia before, but have never pursued it. Someone I knew years ago spent time there and loved it.

    Of course, I'd try to be somewhat careful about my safety even at the best of times.

  75. Give me a rifle... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    If they gave me a rifle and plenty of ammo - I'd do it.

    (19D/11B MOUT Instructer in a previous life)

    If they tried to take me - a lot of them would be dead, and I wouldn't be in custody - although I might be dead; no one is invincible. If the money was in the 7 digits, it might be worth the chance - take out a life insurance policy before you go - either way your family makes out like bandits. Your odds of being captured or killed is very low when you consider the total number of contractors working in the region - akin to being struck by lightning.

    The key is to keep a low profile - don't advertise that you are an anglo technician - wear a baggy burkha to conceal your features and weapons (who gives a f*** if they think you are a woman when you move around - your rifle will make them think twice if they decide to get fresh).

    However, I doubt they are paying over $1 million for technicians...

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Give me a rifle... by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "However, I doubt they are paying over $1 million for technicians..."

      Negotiate tax exemption. And a Billion dollar life insurance policy. If they say "next", count your blessings.

      I'd rather be homeless in San Francisco than making $100,000 in Afghanistan. And forget it if that $100,000 is taxed at the usual rate (or at all).

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  76. you seem to be under the mistaken impression... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that getting shot is painless.
    it's not, i assure you.

  77. Interesting Military Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard this on Canadian TV a few days ago.

    Apparently, the American Military in Iraq decided to do a poll on the feelings of Iraqis towards Americans. The TV report claimed that the results were so negative that the poll was kept secret, unfortunately the results were leaked.

    It didn't seem to differ too much whether the Americans were military, civilian or what!

    I would conclude that any American in Iraq for any reason is a moving, potential disaster zone.

    If you must go, appear as un-American as possible. Grow a beard, dye your hair dark, learn Arabic and convert to Islam. Memorize the phrase, translated into Arabic, "I am a Canadian, really I am!".

    On the other hand, never, never claim, in any language to anybody on either side, "I am a friend of Ahmad Chalabi!".

  78. My advice is to go... by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but if you get abducted and beheaded, don't expect me to shed a tear. I have little sympathy for the carpet-baggers currently over around Iraq's moribund corpse.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    1. Re:My advice is to go... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From another perspective, you could consider these people individuals attempting to help rebuild the infrastructure. If they can't find native professionals who fit the bill, I can think of nothing more reasonable than hiring contractors to come in and do the work.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:My advice is to go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you can find plenty of native iraqies who "fit the bill". Iraqies are one of the most educated people in the world, and its part of their culture to finish university studies (actually most arab countries culture and palestine has the highest rate in the world). The only thing is that not many of them get a chance and dont want to cooperate with the occupation. Especially when that is considered cooperating with the enemy and high risk of loosing your and relatives (collateral damage) lives.

      Brag and talk all you want about saving them from a hideous dictator (put there by the US in the first hand) but bombing them and later 12 years of sanctions and in the end bombing them with even more bombs dont get many people on happy side. So many are still probably pretty pisst off as there hasnt been much of security where they can go on with their lives, instead they get Abu Gharib and nightly visits and constant fear and insecurity even worse than under saddam, as its hard to avoid (if you shutup and follow the saddamitic line you werent hurt nor your relatives).

  79. Re: phpBB by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    What kind of name is phpBB anyway?

    Well, it's a better name than pcpBB.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  80. You forgot a couple steps... by wjwlsn · · Score: 3, Funny
    5) ???
    6) Profit!

    --
    Getting tired of Slashdot... moving to Usenet comp.misc for a while.
  81. Re:Just fit in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it really is sad how true this is...well, not that some white guy that smells bad could be confused with a native...but well, you know.

  82. I enjoyed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Some of us enjoy doing dangerous things. MOST of us live to tell our grandchildren about it.

    1 - Don't learn by experience. My employer spent a lot of money on survival training for me.

    2 - www.survivaliq.com/survival/introduction.htm I wouldn't rely on just reading this but it's better than nothing.

    3 - Make sure you are totally backed up. If they want something bad enough, they will supply you with whatever you need to be safe. I'm sorry but working alone on a cellphone tower in hostile territory ain't going to happen.

    4 - Make absolutely sure that you have transport out.

    I spent a lot of time camped on the ice in the arctic. Every year there were 'adventurers' and 'explorers' who insisted on tackling a very hostile environment without enough resources behind them. We didn't admire their heroism, we scoffed at their stupidity. We were really serious about safety. Our camp had twice daily radio checks to our depot. Everybody out on the ice had hourly radio checks. Everybody had a gun in case of polar bears. We always wore survival suits when flying over water. We never went out alone. We always returned safely.

  83. Its no worse than many other places by RhettLivingston · · Score: 3, Informative

    About a year ago, I purchased a grey market tractor from a man who makes his living off of international trade. He has spent much time on foreign soils wheeling and dealing heavy equipment. He has a physique like a green beret, was raised on a farm, and yet has a law degree with a specialty in international law. I recognized him as an expert in international affairs. Someone in the trenches, not the ivory towers. And I started asking him about his experiences.

    Amongst the more interesting things he stated was that given the current world situation, even before the whole deal with Iraq started, he had decided to stay home for a while. He might consider a trip to Canada, but would not go to Mexico without a few of his ex-Ranger body guards and would under no circumstance venture to South America. He said that worldwide, it had become an accepted business to capture Americans and ransom them back or use them for political means. The authorities in the countries were of no help and usually on the bankroll themselves.

    This was not your average everyday traveller, but a seasoned veteran with heavy duty protection.

    After that discussion and listening to his accounts of how common this problem actually was, especially of friends and acquaintances he knew in the biz who had actually encountered troubles, I'm surprised that there hasn't been far more trouble in Iraq. In truth, it sounds as if the heavy protection being supplied to the contractors there is making them safer than if they were in South America. The only difference is that both the news media and the captors involved in the Iraq situation are motivated to amplify this microcosm of the overall story while they seem motivated to suppress the story of the true worldwide situation.

    So, enjoy your trip to Iraq. But be very careful of Columbia, Peru, Brazil, Indonesia, etc.

    1. Re:Its no worse than many other places by clueless123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This sounds like the classic "Tall" story from someone trying to impress you by pretending that just because he was out of the USA for a couple of weeks .. Now he thinks he's Rambo (tm) IMHO your buddy gave you a lot of bulldroppings and you eat them straight .. Have you been there ? no? ohh.. I thought so... I've been to over there many, many times, and it's no more risky than your average 7-11 on a good day. Do you have any idea how many thousands of turist go to S. America e-v-e-r-y month ? Do you really think they all carry "ex-Ranger" security with them ? For god sake.. most of them are nice senior citizens in really tack outfits.. ever heard of on of them being captured,killed,kidnapped etc ? ? no? oh.. I thought so.. C'mon .. use your head..

    2. Re:Its no worse than many other places by Jardine · · Score: 1

      He might consider a trip to Canada

      No one ever suspects the Canadians! Muahahaha. Let the conquest begin!

    3. Re:Its no worse than many other places by really? · · Score: 1

      We Canadians were never suspected till this :
      http://cwd.ptbcanadian.com/

      Now, the beaver is out of the bag.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    4. Re:Its no worse than many other places by schof · · Score: 1
      About a year ago, I purchased a grey market tractor from a man who makes his living off of international trade. He has spent much time on foreign soils wheeling and dealing heavy equipment. He has a physique like a green beret, was raised on a farm, and yet has a law degree with a specialty in international law. I recognized him as an expert in international affairs. Someone in the trenches, not the ivory towers. And I started asking him about his experiences.

      Amongst the more interesting things he stated was that given the current world situation, even before the whole deal with Iraq started, he had decided to stay home for a while. He might consider a trip to Canada, but would not go to Mexico without a few of his ex-Ranger body guards and would under no circumstance venture to South America.



      It's possible that this person has special circumstances or a good reason to believe he will be targeted that make this level of security reasonable.

      The other possibility is that he's just being a blowhard and doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. If you use common sense and take basic precautions you can travel safely throughout almost all of Central and South America unless you're the son of a millionaire, an arms trader, owe money to drug cartels, or have other special reasons to think you're a target.

    5. Re:Its no worse than many other places by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      Since he brokered two deals for transferring used equipment from Kansas to Chile worth over $100K while I was sitting there, I'd guess he qualifies as a millionaire rather than the son of one. Whether or not he personally has a lot of money, he certainly moves a lot. So, he would likely be a special target for those in the business of getting ransoms. Other targets I've heard about that have been handled quietly are typically high level corporate managers visiting operations. Their corporation's dollars are the real target.

      The case with Iraq in some ways is little different. At least some of the kidnappings have been done by small time players who immediately sold the victims to the bigger organizations. So, they are still driven by money and power (with a smattering of religious excuse to make them feel better), just from a different source that will pay for a wider range of targets,,, American instead of wealthy or powerful American.

      I suspect some of the other responders are the types that go to the tourist areas or American sectors of the other countries and think they've been there. They might get a different reception if they leave the safe zone where people are playing nice and try to find the real country instead of its mask. From what I gathered, this guy was out in the trenches of these countries visiting the construction sites and farms that wanted the heavy equipment, not in the cities.

      Anyway, I'd feel safer with the protection of soldiers in Iraq than roaming the countryside of many other countries without. And that probably has at least a little to do with me. Being someone who can't imagine why you would travel to see a city, when I imagine travelling to other countries, I don't imagine travelling to the tourist traps.

  84. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Where's outsourcing when you need it???"

    1. Re:hmmm... by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Actually outsourcing is going on with this. Have a couple of friends from Pakistan that were hired to do work (with a significant amount of hazard pay thrown in) on setting up the cellular phone infrastructure in Northern Iraq.

  85. Don't repeat this lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The commision said " there was no link between 9/11 and Saddam "not there was no link between Saddam and al-Qaida." Source Lee Hamilton (democrat) co-chair of the 9/11 commission on 6-19-2004. There certainly were links between Saddam and al-qaida opertaves and other terrorsts he explained. There were no links to 9/11 and Saddam.

    Despite being a total fuck tard Bush has never claimed Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. The press and Democrats claim he has but he never has. This is the "War on Terror" of which the invasion of Iraq is a part.

    Don't repeat the lie that Bush or anyone in the current administration claimed Saddam was involved in 9/11. It makes people who know better discount anything else you may have to say which may be valid.

    Don't blame me I didn't vote for him.

    1. Re:Don't repeat this lie. by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      You may be right that Bush never claimed a link between Iraq and September 11, but that link was nonetheless implied. Regardless, as the White House is quick to point out, they never said anything factually untrue (at least about this).

      But as for whether there was a strong link between Iraq and al Qaeda, such a link is doubtful at best. I cannot say whether there was or wasn't, nor, most likely, can you. But considering how mixed the evidence is (with US and British intelligence officers accusing links of either no longer existing--due to mutual mistrust--or never have existing), I'd be a fool to believe what Bush says.

    2. Re:Don't repeat this lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd be a fool to believe what Bush says."

      I believe that you are a fool. Or, just an ostrich.

    3. Re:Don't repeat this lie. by craXORjack · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      as the White House is quick to point out, they never said anything factually untrue (at least about this).

      Thats probably true. They relied on innuendo and rote association instead, the kind of tactics that an elementary school child would use or fall for.

      How could they perpetrate such a fraud on the american public? Easy, just remember that 50% of the population has an IQ below 100 and waving an american flag in front of a redneck is akin to waving a red flag in front of a bull. Charge!

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    4. Re:Don't repeat this lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, 1/2 the population is going to be under 100. That's how that scale was designed. Besides, someone has to defend the country. Pussies like you would cave in to demands in a second.

    5. Re:Don't repeat this lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some moron modded that as flamebait but it could only look like flamebait to someone who doesn't watch the news.

  86. The issue explained.... by gillrock · · Score: 1

    You can obtain a good discussion of this issue and it's pros and cons by watching the 1994 Kevin Smith film "Clerks". The two store clerks discuss and debate the fate of independant contractors that may have been on the second Death Star when it was destroyed. A convenient appearance by a roofing contractor closes the debate and puts it all into perspective for the viewer.

    Personally, I wouldn't set foot over there right now, however I am eternally greatful to all the men and women who are currently serving this great nation. Now let's get the hell out of there.

    --
    "...the shortest distance between two points may be straight line, but it is by no means the most interesting."
  87. do you believe you should be there? by PopCulture · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Interesting that all you address is the risks to pay ratio. Without any further information, I'd have to say that you absolutely suck.

    Do you feel that the US has a duty to Iraq now that we have unilaterally toppled their gov't against the will of the entire planet, and without good reason, thereby creating the largest tide of anti-americanism I have seen in my 28 years of life, and in doing so killed far more innocents than died on 9/11/2001 in the United States? Or hey, do you just want a quick buck?

    I'd say off of your limited statement, you'd fall in to the later. If its pure money then I suspect you'll get exactly what's coming to you.

    --

    Here's to finally giving Bush his exit strategy in November
    1. Re:do you believe you should be there? by PopCulture · · Score: 1

      interesting.

      morality.Equals("flamebait") = True

      --

      Here's to finally giving Bush his exit strategy in November
  88. KBR here in Houston... by boy_afraid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    KBR (Kellog Brown & Root to you people who don't know) has a big location here in Houston. I heard from a friend that works their that they are the exclusive (or short list of exclusive) company that recruits people to go over to Iraq, Afgahnistan, or elsewhere and processes them here in Houston. I've been told that there is pay schedule as to what the normal salary is here in the US, plus 20% added on, plus another %20 added on for hazzard duty, all tax free. But, these numbers could be wrong. It just might be worth it, but my wife says NO WAY for me, otherwise I would go.

    TAX FREE?? Where do I sign up!

    1. Re:KBR here in Houston... by Aardpig · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      TAX FREE?? Where do I sign up!

      Beneath the big banner proclaiming "Grave-Robbers & Corpse Pickers Required".

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  89. You don't read the papers much, do you? by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "What's your likelihood of being abducted by terrorists in Saudi Arabia? Not very high. Even if you are there."

    Well, it's kind of hard to be kidnapped by terrorists in Saudi Arabia if you're NOT there.

    But if you do go there AND you look like an American, then the chances go right up.

    "Certainly not relative to any other of a number of ways you could die."

    Stepped on by an elephant while having sex in Tacoma. Hmmm, statistically, that has NEVER HAPPENED.

    Do you know what "relative" means?

    "You can lock yourself up in your house if you want to. It just depends on how you want to live."

    False dichotomy there.

    Either
    Lock yourself in your house
    or
    Go someplace where lots of people who don't like you want to kill you and can recognize you easily.

    Yeah. Whatever.

    "If you are really concerned about your life being out of control and in the hands of terrorists, just get fitted with one of those poison teeth. Then at least you can save yourself from suffering while you die."

    So, the terrorists can kill me or I can kill myself before the terrorists kill me.

    Only on /. would something like that be mod'ed "Insightful".

    How about he get a job at a small insurance company and die from a heart attack 60 years from now brought on by too many donuts for breakfast for 60 years?

    1. Re:You don't read the papers much, do you? by j_at_work · · Score: 0

      How about he get a job at a small insurance company and die from a heart attack 60 years from now brought on by too many donuts for breakfast for 60 years?
      Mmmm, donuts...

    2. Re:You don't read the papers much, do you? by jhoger · · Score: 1

      The point still stands. How many workers have been living in Saudi Arabia? How many have been abducted and killed by terrorists?

      There's no false dichotomy in my argument. My point is that ANYWHERE YOU GO YOU CAN DIE. A lot of people don't like to deal with that fact.

      There are plenty of criminals out there that will kill you without a second thought. There are plenty of situations you can get it in which there is no malicious agent but in which you can still die.

      I'm just trying to inject a little clear thinking into the discussion here. Your "Go someplace where lots of people who don't like you want to kill you and can recognize you easily..." hmm... other than the "lots of people" I think any major city could satisfy that description. I'm sure there are plenty of major cities (New York, LA, etc.) where I could go and I could be easily recognized as a Mark and could be robbed and killed.

      So then you have to quantify "lots of people." Can you? What's the ratio of the population of Saudi Arabian inhabitants that are murderous thugs out to kill Americans vs. those that are either indifferent or friendly or just don't like killing folks?

      Only on /. would unintersting rehash of other drivel like yours be modded insightful.

  90. Re:Show me the money. by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? I'm dead serious. If I wasn't nearly blind in my left eye, I'd be a Marine right now, in an infantry MOS just as my brother is. He spent his time in Iraq, I only wish I was alongside him helping the people get out from under 30 years of oppression. If I can do it by using my nerd skills, but being sane and having adequate protection (a nerd usually has the ability to think before entering a given situation: going into Iraq now unarmed is suicide, and not something a geek would fucking do), give me the chance.

    I'm not in it for the money, I want to help people out. I'd lose money with my earlier statement of $100,000 / year.

    --
    "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
  91. I call bull shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iraq has more clean water and electricity today than it ever had under Saddam. How come so many "wedding parties" seem to get blown up in Afganistan and Iraq? Cause it's bull shit. It's like calling "police brutality" or saying "When did you quit beating your wife." Once it's said you can't counter it. Terrorists are not stupid they know how to manipulate the media.

    So STFU and cower in your basement and rag on the US because you don't have a brain you can use to think for yourself. If the press dislikes a president he must be doing something right, if the French and BBC dislike him it's even better proof.

    Don't blame me I didn't vote for him. But I doubt you are even a US citizen or resident.

    1. Re:I call bull shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, sure terrorists manipulating the media :) I heard they have al quaida embedded reporters at fox news now too.

      Instead of accusing other people of having no brain because they don't believe the shit the government is spilling out but opt to believe the other side of the medal is ... ah well, non-liberal.

      Let's just go back and pile some prisoners, maybe we can build pyramids that look like the white house or a portrait of saddam?

  92. Consider carefully by Elvis+Maximus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am not a computer professional; I do international development work and so I travel a fair bit. I was in Afghanistan and Pakistan last summer and Iraq last November and December.

    I found Afghanistan pretty likeable, but it would be a hard place to live for an extended period. Outside of Kabul it gets very primitive very quickly. Additionally, the security situation outside of Kabul is very much worse than it is inside.

    I found Iraqis (and most people, really) to be pretty nice, hospitable people, but the situation there is just all kinds of bad. The security situation is part of it, and this keeps you indoors and in very close quarters a lot of the time, and this gets old quick. And regardless of how you feel about the current administration or the war, being an American in Iraq is a mighty uncomfortable thing to be in 2004.

    I presume the people paying big money for these services are military or military contractors. In both Afghanistan and Iraq, these guys live in shipping containers, often in the middle of nowhere. In the Green Zone, shipping containers are stacked everywhere and people are shoved into any space that will fit them. Many people --civilian contractors -- share their bunks in shifts.

    If you are really considering this just for the money, I would think very carefully about what you are doing. How much is money really worth? Because especially in Iraq, you will be exposing yourself to physical danger and psychic stress that is considerable.

    And if you are going for a travel experience, I can support that, but I would suggest that in a military environment you are unlikely to get much of a cultural experience. There are other, better ways to do this.

    If you really believe in what you would be doing (as I did), then go, but do keep an open mind and remain observant and inquisitive; regardless of your position now, you will find things are quite different from how you thought they were.

    --

    -
    Give me liberty or give me something of equal or lesser value from your glossy 32-page catalog.

    1. Re:Consider carefully by demachina · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Guess it depends on who you are or maybe exactly where you are. There are apparently hearings coming up on Halliburton's fraud, waste and abuse in Iraq. Here are some examples the Republican's are trying to suppress.

      Apparently Halliburton's financial staff in Kuwait are staying in the five star Kempinski Julai'a Hotel and Resort. The tab is $10,000 a night. A 100 people apparently ran up a one million dollar bill in 3 months. The Army tried to move them to tents but they refused.

      Some other examples apparently from ex employees and whistleblowers:

      "Abandoned $85,000 trucks because of flat tires and minor problems."

      "Paid $100 to have a 15-pound bag of laundry cleaned as part of a million-dollar laundry contract in peaceful Kuwait. The price for cleaning the same amount of laundry in war-torn Iraq was $28."

      "Spent $1.50 a can to buy 37,200 cans of soda in Kuwait, about 24 times higher than the contract price."

      I like the truck story the best. If true it appears the Iraqi insurgents can decimate the U.S. supply lines by throwing sharpened jacks in the road in front of Halliburton's convoys. Once the trucks are abandoned they are most probably looted, stolen or burned.

      War profiteering is always ugly and if you go in to one of these war zones as a contractor that is basically what you are.

      The problem with war profiteers is that when you have companies like Halliburton and its subsidary Kellog Brown and Root(KBR) who make a fortune off wars they have strong motivations to encourage and promote wars. KBR has been profiting off war since at least Vietnam when it was Brown and Root. I see another post that indicates they are doing the same thing in the Balkans.

      It really disturbing when you have a Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney, who rewrites all the Pentagon's rules and moves half the jobs formerly done by soldiers, like driving trucks and cooking, to contractors so KBR can an even better profit since the Army is now totally dependent on them. Cheney, as his reward gets a cushy job as Halliburton/KBR's CEO where he cashes in on his generosity as Secretary of Defense. He then returns to government as VP where he was the #1 cheerleader for a war waged under false pretenses where his old company is raking in billions in sole source contracts. Cheney denies he arranged the contracts. Well he didn't have to. KBR always gets all the Army's war zone logistics contracts and have for a long time.

      Another disturbing example is Blackwater. Blackwater consists mostly of ex green berets, rangers, seals and delta force. Uncle Sam spends a fortune to train them. At the first opportunity they get out and join Blackwater where they make 6 figure salaries. They are mercenaries, plain and simple. The mercenary army is the single largest army in Iraq, after the U.S. and larger than the British contingent. The four mercenaries killed in Fallujah that started the month long war there were from Blackwater (Blackwater being the term for SEALS attacking from the water at night).

      War profiteering really and truly stinks. It helps propel nations in to wars, for bad reasons, that get a lot of people killed.

      --
      @de_machina
    2. Re:Consider carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are *not* mercenaries. Mercanaries fight wars. Blackwater personnel are primarily escort/bodyguard positions and do not carry the weapons that mercanaries would.

    3. Re:Consider carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another indoctrinated neo-con moron, anyone?

    4. Re:Consider carefully by Coyote · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've worked for a couple of companies that have advertised huge bonuses and paychecks to work on projects in the middle east. None of the assignments were like post-war Iraq, so this might not apply. The jobs were all in countries with stable locally-owned and operated governments, and these were not a US government funded projects, so excess costs didn't get billed back.

      I never had a desire to go, based on the experience of others who had returned and told how their huge paychecks were eaten away by various bribes. For instance, you could live in a tent... or... you could pay a local a nice bundle to get you into some kind of better housing.

      Those who returned had two complaints; they were bored to death the whole time they were there, and a lot of their money went to paying off the local insiders.

      --
      My metamoderation cancels your moderation
    5. Re:Consider carefully by anothy · · Score: 2, Funny
      I am not a computer professional...
      i'm sorry, are you lost?
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    6. Re:Consider carefully by demachina · · Score: 1

      Every picture of them I've seen they are carrying machine guns, better than the M-16's the underpaid grunts next to them are carrying and they have the best body armor, better than most of the grunts had for the first year in Iraq. I'll grant you they don't drive M-1's or or fly Apaches but I wager they are packing the same weapons they packed when they were SEALS, why would they carry anything less.

      Blackwater is doing exactly the same thing Army grunts are doing in Iraq know, guarding people, places and supply lines. Thats what Army's do when they are in occupation mode, the grunts just get paid a lot less and there aren't enough of them.

      --
      @de_machina
    7. Re:Consider carefully by demachina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you would care to share with us the "whole story" preferably with some references instead of just libeling Waxman. Is the "truth" secret or maybe you are just blowing smoke and there aren't any "parts" that tear up my side of the story or your so lame you can't back up your BS.

      Waxman is a pretty tireless crusader against fraud, waste and abuse all over the government, its not like he is out to just get Halliburton. If you are a taxpayer you owe him a small debt of gratitude those his efforts are almost completely lost in the massive pork and corruption that currently infects the U.S. government.

      --
      @de_machina
    8. Re:Consider carefully by howardholton · · Score: 1

      Just a small point - Dick Cheney is our Vice President, not Secretary of Defense, that is Donald Rumsfield. I know it is hard to keep the rich old guys straight, but there is a huge difference between Vp and SoD

      --
      Everyone is Ignorant, just in different subjects.
    9. Re:Consider carefully by PsibrII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, war is hell isn't it ? No place to be for a penny pinching CPA with no sense of humor. The place for those people to be is working for the medical or medial drug industry. On one end of the equation you charge uninsured people $15 for a tylenol, on the other end of it, you cut the benefits and lower the wages of the guys working the incinerator and handling the medical waste. All while your PR people scam the general public and government to kiss their ass for opeing up a "burn ward for children"

      War profiteering has nothing on day to day medical industry scams.

    10. Re:Consider carefully by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. Dick was SecDef under dubyas daddy.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  93. For your security. by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    Insist on being given given an armored car (such as a BMW 760HS) and a highly trained driver to get around in. I see so many stories on the news of even high level diplomats that have been killed in there cars. I see the bullet holes and think to myself "why the fuck werent these people driving armored cars". If you can get this garantee then by all means do it. Other than that tell them to where to stick the job offer.

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  94. Not exactly like that. by khasim · · Score: 1

    "On a related note, I would like to see a comparison of the daily murder rate in Iraq compared to the daily murder rate for an inner-city such as, oh, let's say Detroit."

    So, you're talking gang-related killings and such?

    You do realize that, in the mid-east, you are the target for every "gang" out there, don't you?

    In Detroit, the average, non-gang, person has a low probability of being shot. While the stats for gang-members are many times higher.

    In the mid-east, the average person BORN AND RAISED THERE has a low chance of being shot. But a white American has a really big chance of being shot.

    1. Re:Not exactly like that. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wow. That's a pretty impressive show of completely ignoring the facts in order to make your point. Neato.

      Look, numbers don't lie. Plain facts don't lie. Last December, the story broke that the homicide rate in Baghdad had fallen to below the largest American cities. If you took the military casualties out of the equation, the Baghdad murder rate was lower than any American city.

      (The story was covered in depth by Canada's National Post. They don't have it on their site any more, but here's what appears to be a reasonably intact copy of the original.)

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:Not exactly like that. by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty impressive show of completely ignoring the facts in order to make your point. Neato.

      Look, numbers don't lie. Plain facts don't lie. Last December, the story broke that the homicide rate in Baghdad had fallen to below the largest American cities. If you took the military casualties out of the equation, the Baghdad murder rate was lower than any American city.


      So, your point is then that Baghdad natives are safer than NYC natives? How does that relate at all to this discussion?

      The parent was merely pointing out that you can't look at the total murder rate in baghdad if you want to know how likely you are to die if you went over there as a contractor. That would be lying with statistics.

  95. not just money by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    I tried to find something as a Sr-ish sysadmin over there for a while myself, and never saw anything. I myself would feel honored to go, for two reasons: 1) to be able to put forth a meaningful effort to show Iraqi's that there are Americans that do care about their welfare, and 2) same reason I joined the military back before Desert Storm - civic duty. I could easily get that money in Manhattan or something, and not need to worry (as much) about getting beheaded on the way home from work. There are better reasons to go over there than money.

  96. I was there, will never go back by mysterious_mark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I served in the Persian Gulf during my active duty years in the Navy. I am now retired fortunatley. These days however, there is no way I would go back to that region for any reason or any amount of money. There is widespread hatred of Americans in the region, and anyone western is a target. The situation was bad when I was there, and now it is so much worse, I can't even imagine. Having made it through my Gulf tour without incident, I consider myself lucky, but having got back here safely, I'll never ever go back, not for any reason, or any amount of money. Believe me whatever the're paying you it isn't worth it. Its not really fun in that part of the world, so a best case scenario in you won't have much fun, the worse is you could end up shipped backed in a plastic bag. I'd say do no go, what would it be like for you're family if you were killed over there just for a job? There are other jobs, no job is worth dying for. Obviously the political situation in the middle east is only deteriorating, stay home, don't be a statistic, don't risk putting yourself family through what could happen. You saw the news today, I'd think that would speak for itself. Mark

    1. Re:I was there, will never go back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well good for you.

      I lived in Arabia for 6 years (1980-86) and it was one of the better places I've been. I'm looking forward to going back.

    2. Re:I was there, will never go back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... you're saying he shouldn't go? Just making sure we're clear here.

    3. Re:I was there, will never go back by anothy · · Score: 1
      ...stay home, don't be a statistic...
      ironically, this is, i think, the big underlying motivation to go (aside from the cash, which is just dumb). people don't want to be a statistic: they don't want to die of heart disease in the 55-65 range, or consume 19 cheeseburgers a month, or whatever tonight's evening news statistic is. people use statistics to try to understand very large numbers, very large sets of data. like incidence of colon cancer in adult males, or depression in middle-aged mothers, or whatever. people don't use statistics to talk about civilian contractor abductions, because you'd be talking about like 0.00001% of the US population, maybe. or 0.1% of the US population in the middle ease (1 in 1000?). people don't use statistics for that because it's rare, and the names stick out, and can stick in your memory.

      so, yeah: don't be a statistic.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  97. word to the wise by jdkane · · Score: 1

    You can't use the money if you're dead.

  98. since you will be earning $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go to the ghetto and find a really big guy as a bodyguard.

  99. Simple, moral, solution. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since Iraq needs to be rebuilt....

    Why not hire and train Iraqi citizens to rebuild it?

    There, no moral questions about hourly pay rates for the citizens of the country that bombed them in the first place.

    1. Re:Simple, moral, solution. by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not hire and train Iraqi citizens to rebuild it?

      Huh? You're shitting me, aren't you? I mean, what the fuck is the point in bombing Iraq in the first place, if Halliburton and others don't get the sweet contracts to rebuild?

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:Simple, moral, solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says that's NOT being done. Saudi Arabia has lots of unemployed young people and have been in the oil business for decades. So why aren't they training their people to do all the work in the oil fields? Why are a large percentage of the workers from the North America, Europe, etc?

    3. Re:Simple, moral, solution. by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      Yes, and that would only take a couple of, what, DAYS, surely? CERTAINLY they could cope without infrastructure until THEN!

      No, they couldn't. Come to think of it, though, training native people to build their infrastructure is probably why schools are being built, yes?

      Just as the US had a responsibility to remove Saddam after they were the ones who put him in power, they are the ones who have the responsibility to begin forward momentum in rebuilding infrastructure in Iraq.

      Am I ticked about the probability of wrongdoing with Haliburton contracts? Yes. But that doesn't mean that my knee-jerk response is to say the US shouldn't be helping.

      And helping, they are. Many people in Iraq already now live much, much better than they ever have. Some are even online, why don't you check their journals?

  100. Consider going. by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You need to talk to people who have been there. Not recruters. If it checks aout any your exposure to risk is minimal go for it, go. I had a friend who went to Viet Nam and ran a "Bank of America" Branch on a base. He made tons of money and also some good life expierence. He talks about maintaining the check reading machines that were in a quanset hut with a dirt floor (loads of fun.)

    All these folks are using this as an advantage to express there political leanings and anti war sentiment not to give you reasonable advice. In short talking about shit they know nothing about. This is not a referundum on George Bush, al-Qaida, 9/11 or, war and peace. It's about a overseas job.

    The last thing you should trust is the news media, If it's so fucking dangerous how come they are still over there?

    --
    If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
    Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
    1. Re:Consider going. by das3cr · · Score: 1
      The last thing you should trust is the news media, If it's so fucking dangerous how come they are still over there?

      Because they are getting PAID to be there and do a job and they like.

      Rod
      --
      Hurricane Island Outward Bound
      OB
  101. Re:Show me the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stupid cheesedick liberals don't let me have one here legally in the US
    Just out of curiousity, you call liberals cheesedicks, but you quote Bad Religion, one of the most liberal bands out there, in your sig?
    Why?

  102. Networking in the Danger Zone? by das3cr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have given allot of thought to this. I have been tempted to "go over the hill" so many times. Hell, I've been thinking about it since I was there back in 1989-93. A gravy job, tax free money, (AFTER 3 YEARS !!!) a fat wallet. What more could you ask for? A nice villa some where, a boat, a car ? Sure, they'll give it to you. A nice big old life insurance policy, sure they'll give that to you too. As for the other things like: female companionship, i.e. YOUR wife, or your girlfriend, or some nice local girl...NO WAY....Heck when I was there they executed two Egyptian woman for "talking" to some marines. The GI's were deported overnight . We (the entire unit) were INVITED to attend the BEHEADING down at the soccer...errr...football???? field on Friday night and our Commander denied us permission to go, not that any of us wanted to attend anyway...

    The dangers facing "contract workers" today are many times more dangerous than even 10 years ago, it's hard to describe the climate as anything other than "extremely hazardous". It's NEVER been rosy for Americans in the middle east nor Africa and it never will be. Having said that, I would still go to one of these Third World Countries and continue mission given a realistic chance of surviving AND coming home with the loot.

    Now a true story of a "contract veteran" I last saw "somewhere" in the middle east:

    I had a Warrant officer who retired right after Operation Desert Storm and went and worked for the Saudi National Guard as a supply tech. While he was over there I "stopped in" to see him and to find out how he liked his new employers. His response (which was very negative and remain the main reasons I haven't yet went for any of these jobs) was that:
    A) He was treated very badly. Worse than the Third Country Nationals.
    B) They wouldn't let him bring over any dependences even after being there a year (that was the deal, after 1 year he got his wife and kids)
    C) The supply system was broke worse than ours (meaning the US Army's) and no one would allow him to fix it. (Sound familiar??)

    After all was said and done he fulfilled his contract and returned in one piece to the states. The same cannot be said of a lot of workers there today.

    And FWIW IMNSHO Bush is the ONLY reason why we are not all bowing 5 times a day to a rock and all trying to figure out what happened to church bells on Sunday. I Know /. People all like to fantasize that this is "Bush's war" (your ALL wrong by the way) but we nor did he ask for 9/11, the Cole , Beirut , the Kobar Tower bombings (I was there, and saw 2 diff barracks building get it, two diff years, one right next to me!!! And still to this day NO Justice!!), Lockerbie, Mogadishu, US. Embassies, how many suicide bombers? and on and on until the two recent beheadings (at least this time it was carried out by terrorists.)

    Yet, I'm still tempted ... money, adrenaline, the challenge of staying alive when you know they are out to get you, all the dime store novel intrigue and suspense........Yup, still tempted !! No sarcasm intended. BUT I am still firmly on home town soil USA ......

    Rod F.
    PFC

    Dawn, n.: The time when men of reason go to bed.

    --
    Hurricane Island Outward Bound
    OB
    1. Re:Networking in the Danger Zone? by das3cr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Where's the justice for the several thousand Iraqi civilians who died in Bush's war. Weren't they just as innocent as those who died on 9/11?
      It's NOT Bush's War

      It's anyone's war who decides that embracing freedom is better than embracing cowardice or kowtowing to murderers.

      As for the inocent civilians...what about all the innocent civilians whom the terrorist are trying / have killed?
      Rod

      --
      Hurricane Island Outward Bound
      OB
    2. Re:Networking in the Danger Zone? by norkakn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking from the outside, the US seems to be getting less free every day.

      It is quite sad, but I am glad that I will be leaving when I finish school

      If the defense destroys what it is supposed to protect, it seems hard to find a good reason to use it.

    3. Re:Networking in the Danger Zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have fun. we won't miss you.

    4. Re:Networking in the Danger Zone? by secretasiandan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why is this insightful? The first bit is informative, perhaps, but the second bit about bush being the only reason we aren't bowing to rocks is absurd.

      Since when are there armies of muslims trying to invade our country and implement "regime change" in the US? That there is a group who want to influence US policy with terrorism is clear. But to say that there is a large enough group with the intent to force us all to Islam is absurd.

      The reason for many of the terroist incidents the parent lists was to disuade the US from trying to control governments in the middle east, not to convert us to Islam. Parent doesn't seem very aware of the true reasons for those terrorist acts. For example, Osama bin Laden's main goal is to get US troops out of Saudi Arabia.

      --
      Is this where my sig goes?
    5. Re:Networking in the Danger Zone? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      But to say that there is a large enough group with the intent to force us all to Islam is absurd.

      At the present time, there isn't. But you are woefully ignorant of history; haven't you heard of the Ottoman Empire? In the 16th and 17th Centuries, it was what we would now call a "superpower". In as also known as the "Khalifah" which means Islamic Empire.

      So don't think that Moslems are just these people in funny clothes riding camels in the desert. At one time they were a force that posed a serious threat to the West. They conquered Hungary and invaded Austria. And, they could be again. Which is why Western policymakers are trying to preempt that happening.

      For example, Osama bin Laden's main goal is to get US troops out of Saudi Arabia.

      It's funny you should mention that; did you actually listen to Osama's speech just after September 11th? What really upset him was the abolition of the Caliphate in Turkey in 1922 - this is the "80 years of humiliation". That was precipitated by the defeat by the West in WW1. Osama's agenda is far larger than just removing Americans from Saudi Arabia - he wants the Khalifah back again.

  103. No way by gwoodrow · · Score: 2, Funny

    I scream like a little girl just playing Silent Hill 3. I imagine if I worked in a war zone, I'd have to wear a diaper and keep a pacifier handy. No thank you... I shit myself enough as it is.

    (Sorry... had to lighten up this somber topic.)

  104. Scale Of Hazard, YMMV... by cmholm · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's what I'm hearing from widely scattered classmates from the former American School Of Isfahan, Iran:

    Afghanistan: The Kabul/Bagram area are relatively safe. Occasional bombings and shootings sound worse in the media than is perceived locally. Locals don't see you as a target. Resist the temptation to see the rest of the country, and you'll be fine. Heroin use among foreign rear echelon motherfuckers is 'way up... do avoid that.

    Kuwait: basically safe, but events in Iraq and SA will continue increase tensions. Do as you would in most poor nations (which Kuwait is not) and try not to stand out. Do a year or two and call it a day.

    Bahrain: more of a disconnect between rulers and ruled than Kuwait. Looks good compared to SA, Iraq, Afghan.

    Qatar & UAE: Looks good. Act conservatively, as has been the case in the Gulf all along. If SA goes down the shitter, there will be spill over, but at least you'll have plenty of warning.

    Saudi: things are going to get worse before they get better. Do not take your family, as you'll be forced to live in a foreign compound. If at all posible, live in well off but Arab-heavy apartment complexes or developments. Make a habit of varying your routine outside of the office. Have in mind an alternate exit from said office.

    Iraq: If you're lucky enough to work AND live strictly within the occupation authority's green zone in downtown Baghdad, knock yourself out. Keep in mind that that zone will be shrinking considerably over the next 12 months into a still huge US Embassy, so make sure you don't get stuck outside with a housing allowance and a pat on the back. For the less risk adverse, 24x7 at one of the bigger military bases is a consideration. Next down the list is Metro Basra as long as the Badr (as opposed to Sadr) militia and it's political front stay happy. Ditto with the Kurdish areas, which aren't much worse than eastern Turkey. Pass on Mosul, Kirkuk, and the whole rest of the country. If you're going to be driving anywhere, for God's sake opt for small, cheap sedans. Big sedans are begging to be car jacked, and SUVs broadcast "USA" like a HUMMV.

    Iran: I throw this in for contrast. If a US citizen/resident alien, your biggest problem will be explaining yourself to Uncle Sam. Consult with an attorney to make darn sure you aren't in conflict with US economic restrictions on trade with Iran before you go. Don't hit on local women, bad mouth Islam or the government, or take pictures of any thing that even resembles a government or military installation. In fact, this is more of a normal overseas posting, so it's not nearly as lucrative. There are some up to date tourist guide books on the country, and good poop from the British and Australian Embassy web sites.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    1. Re:Scale Of Hazard, YMMV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another country to watch for is Uzbekistan, formerly part or USSR/Russia. There are contracts going up to help rebuild it even though there is controversy about the government and human rights/terrorism. several quick points if you do go, hazard pay is 25% plus regular (at least for Uzbek.), housing/travel is generally provided by company, if working outside of U.S. for >6 months them you may not have to pay taxes

    2. Re:Scale Of Hazard, YMMV... by cancerward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Iran: I throw this in for contrast. If a US citizen/resident alien, your biggest problem will be explaining yourself to Uncle Sam. Consult with an attorney to make darn sure you aren't in conflict with US economic restrictions on trade with Iran before you go. Don't hit on local women, bad mouth Islam or the government, or take pictures of any thing that even resembles a government or military installation. In fact, this is more of a normal overseas posting, so it's not nearly as lucrative. There are some up to date tourist guide books on the country, and good poop from the British and Australian Embassy web sites.

      I'm an Australian who lived in Iran from March 2002 to October 2003. I don't think I was ever in any physical danger - I don't see why it would rate hazard pay now. I mean, people, we're talking about the third biggest country on orkut, where women post pictures of themselves without hijab and everyone lists their drinking frequency. Many Westerners have strange misimpressions about the place, and the Western media typically emphasise only aspects that stand out, not everyday life. Because of this, I have to come to believe and tell others that the only way to understand Iran is to visit personally.

    3. Re:Scale Of Hazard, YMMV... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      I suggest virtualtourist.com

      lots of people post their good bad points and photos of every place on earth.

      Check it out

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  105. Don't let the pay go to your head ... by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    120,000 USD/year isn't anything to sneeze at.

    Considering that most USA IT pro pay scale has
    gone way down in the last 2 years, MOST of the
    pay differential is hazardous duty pay. Very
    recent events in the ME would indicate that the
    pay differential is for REAL RISKS.

    I understand that the pay is tax-free, so there
    is more money to spend on health & life ins.,
    ceramic body armour, and a folding AK-47.

    Where do I sign up?

    1. Re:Don't let the pay go to your head ... by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Why not start with Monster?

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  106. Do you care about the media? by sybert · · Score: 1
    It depends on how much you value your life and if you care about how the media may portray your death.

    By working in the Middle-East, the chances of your death becoming national news increases dramatically. This is just like if you get shot in a school than your death will become national news. There was all the fuss over profiling likely school shooters when the profile or the classmate most likely to kill your child is one who is behind the wheel and drunk. The media is not a good informer of the real risks you face in life.

    You make choices involving life and death, health, and other risks every day. The market does a good job of discovering and pricing the risk premiums of various hazardous activities. The Economist looked at some data and found that the price that Americans put on their life is around $7 million. The question is how much you value your life compared to the market?

  107. Who wants you there, and why? by droleary · · Score: 1

    A lot of people have chimed in with their own answers, so I'll instead pose the subject question. If it isn't Iraqis that penned the invite, I wouldn't suggest going. You're looking to go into a situation where "rebuilding" has begun though the war isn't over. They don't collectively want your help, and that should be enough to pass.

  108. Been there! By all means go! by LucidVisions · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I lived in Bagh-town for 3 months this year on Camp Victory. It was awesome. But make no mistake, it is dangerous: I was attacked at least once a day by rocket fire, mortar fire, or gunfire. Everyday is a day on the edge. However, in exchange for the risk, you come back with a WAD of cash (I made $4000/m just for being a go-fer), a sense of survival (nothing really shakes my tree anymore.. except slamming doors and unexpected sounds.. what I meant was people don't scare me anymore), and a wonderful sense of culture. The arabs are WONDERFUL people. Very unselfish and friendly (except the ones that one to kill us). I made many friends, and now have a good understanding of arabic. If you want to talk to me, reply to this message. I would be happy to discuss it with you. -Dust

    1. Re:Been there! By all means go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Kana tatakalemu alluga alarabeeya qibla an tusaafira ila Iraq?

    2. Re:Been there! By all means go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speak iraqi with him...not MSA...thats the test =)

    3. Re:Been there! By all means go! by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      how did you score that job? call me crasy but i'd love to work in iraq. i find the idea of helping build things from the ground up exciting and once in a live time chance. my primary experience is in linux/bsd admin/ network admin. but given that i can handle anything IT and i'm not afraid to do it tough.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    4. Re:Been there! By all means go! by LucidVisions · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I kind of get the jist of what you're saying (Something about, I learned arabic in Iraq?). The dialect I learned was all Iraqi though. If I went any other place than there, my accent would be immediately recognized as such. I think that you have the Kana wrong, too. When you're speaking to someone and asking them a question, shouldn't it be enteh? For instance, enteh kallem eengileese? (You speak english?) whereas ana would be more like "I". like.. Ana kallem zeyn arabee! (I speak good arabic), or ana asi'f habbibi. (I'm sorry, my love) So yeah. I don't know. All I know is Iraqi arabic.

    5. Re:Been there! By all means go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to know more as well, hit me up at ( remove spaces) master of shadows at hot mail

      thx

    6. Re:Been there! By all means go! by PhiberKut · · Score: 0

      I've wanted to do something in the middle east ever since learning about T.E. Lawrence.

      Would you mind taking a look at my resume - http://www.elijahchancey.com/resume.pdf and pointing me in the right direction?

      Sincerely,
      Elijah (elijah@elijahchancey.com)

      --
      Elijah Chancey www.elijahsadventure.com nomadic IT consultant, bicycling across america "all that you touch / and all
    7. Re:Been there! By all means go! by LucidVisions · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Though my IT abilities were used (and were SUBSTANSIALLY better than what I was hired for), my primary task was go-fer. 1. Get up at 6am EVERY day (no days off maggot!) 2. Pick up Iraqis at gate 3. Have Iraqis searched by bitter 1st Armored men 4. Escort Iraqis into base 5. Babysit Iraqis all day. Make sure they don't do anything stupid like.. try to pace off a distance, take a triangulation, take azimuth readings.. etc.. make sure they aren't trying to kill you basically. (BTW Working with them is like herding cats, but being with them is pretty fun) 6. Get lunch. 7. Babysit some more 8. Take Iraqis out of base (Usually about 1700) 9. ??? 10. Barbeque! =) The company I used to work for wanted me back really bad. I had to turn it down though. I wish there was a way for me to hook you up, but there's not. Sorry dude. But hey.. I'll still talk about it. heh.

    8. Re:Been there! By all means go! by LucidVisions · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry guys. I don't work for the company anymore. I wish I could help you out. =\

    9. Re:Been there! By all means go! by LucidVisions · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention stay the hell away from KBR. A good company is Morrell Consulting out of Salt Lake(a.k.a. The Event Source). That's who I worked for. Good luck to you guys.

    10. Re:Been there! By all means go! by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      hey if the pay is right i could do that no sweat. can you tell me who was doing the hiring? i so maybe i could hook myself up

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    11. Re:Been there! By all means go! by LucidVisions · · Score: 1

      Hrm. I'm debating. erm.. look up a guy named Colin on eventsource.com. That's all I can say. It's not that I'm trying to keep something from you. Just that I don't know if I should release who does the hiring on slashdot. heh. ;)

    12. Re:Been there! By all means go! by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      kk, tims@cqpl.com.au i already get a huge amount of spam. whats another 100 emails a day

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    13. Re:Been there! By all means go! by equex · · Score: 1

      The arabs are WONDERFUL people. Very unselfish and friendly (except the ones that one to kill us).

      Yeah, obviously. HAHAHHA :p

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
    14. Re:Been there! By all means go! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      hmmm, $4k a month seems low for contract work abroad in a post-war zone that still hasn't settled down. The global construction company I work for is paying over $200 an hour for work in dangerous contries, and that includes IT-related work like project scheduling, budgeting, etc. But I'm just making $44 / hour for them working here in the U.S. at a power plant, which is plenty, thank you! Maybe if I was single without children.....

    15. Re:Been there! By all means go! by $carab · · Score: 1

      First off, I've only been studying arabic for a year, and probably should have been paying more attention in class, so if I butcher this analysis, my apoligies.

      Kana puts whatever comes after it in the past tense in MSA (I think or maybe it's Kanat sometimes and using Kana in all contexts is Levantine?)

      The tense, "inteh" as you describe, is embedded in the verb, which starts with "ta-", that is implying second person male (or third person female), i.e. "Used to you speak ..." => "Did you speak".

      The way I learned arabic colloquially growing up, which was Levantine, in the Jerusalem area, all the "k" became "ch" and while there were verb conjuagtions, it seemed like more of the time there were substitutions for conjugated verbs based on possessives, such as, "bidee ishrab shai" => "I want to drink tea" instead of MSA, which would be (I think) "ureed an ashrab shai". It looks like colloquial Iraqi eschews verb conjugation entirely, perhaps?

      Regardless, I enjoyed reading about your experiences. It's always refreshing to see a thread that could contain loads of ignorant, anti-Arab sentiments turn out to be full of interesting memories such as yours.

  109. Best way to stay alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell the Iraqis you're Canadian.

  110. Re:might as well be a drug dealer by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    Well said. It's refreshing to read a post from someone who looks beyond the simple money vs. security issues.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  111. mr FlameBait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you are

    not

    a US citizen please read the /. FAQ and come back and ask me if I give a flying fuck about your opinion. News for you if a US citizen falls down and scrapes his knee it's "being reported." There are no hidden "contractor" deaths. The US media would report them in a heart beat as it's anti war and anti Bush, just like you.

  112. Real Concern by Law1620 · · Score: 1

    I have my two best friends working on a contract to install a network on the Border of two of the countries mentioned above. The pay is great but in the light of events happening lately it makes me wonder if it is really worth it? Just because there being paid well and will have armed security doesn't mean that some extremist group won't pay more to have the oppertunity to kiddnap them. What we forget is that if you think the almighty dollars buy alot here, it's buy multiple times more an most countries in the world.

  113. Shame people still take hostages by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    You would have thought they'd get the message by now, no one has a clue what these people want, since the media isn't interested in that there to bussy with pictures of the poor guys familly, and no one ever gives into hostage takers since otherwise hostage taking turns into a viable way of geting something and thus more common.

    Never underestimate the stupidity of people in groups.

  114. Re:Show me the money. by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

    Because I like Greg Graffin, he's a wonderful thinker. I don't happen to agree with some things he talks about, but I do own all of BR's albums, and I listen to 4 of them on a daily basis. The sig quote is one thing I absolutely agree with him on, namely that religion is a waste that humans have put up with for too fuckin long. In my "cheesedick liberal" line, I'm referring to the almost absolute stance on the abolishment of firearms by the liberal line, which is 100% foolish and is a cause of the situation in which we are in today. We're battling to raise the oppressed out of their plight because they have been trampled by religion and have no means to fight back against the dictators who take their arms. In this respect, Saddam == Hitler.

    As you can see, I don't toe any party line, and can stand behind whatever side is correct.

    --
    "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
  115. Real vs. Virtual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you pussies who daydream about being Neo and kicking everyones ass in slow motion may as well stop reading this discussion now because it deals with real bullets and real death. Go finish your game of Tomb raider and wanking off over Lara Croft.

  116. watch out by js7a · · Score: 1
    The CPA has begun lying about their own polls.

    Plus, there are still hundreds of unaccounted-for surface-to-air missles hiding somewhere.

    I'd at least wait until the SAM caches are found and the CPA misinformation stops.

  117. No Way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a chance. Companies may be willing to pay double or triple your usual salary, but they cant buy you your life back. And even if you are not physically harmed, you would have to give up years of your life living in a society so restrictive that it would not be worthwhile.

  118. This is complete FUD by stripmarkup · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am in South America right now, more precisely in Argentina. There is a thriving expat community here, last night I attended a late dinner at a restaurant with a bunch of Americans. This city (Buenos Aires) is as safe as any US city if not safer. I know dozens of Americans here and never heard of anyone having any problems besides a few being victims of petty theft, just like in any other big city.

    Obviously this person does not know what he's talking about. The world outside the US is not as frightening as some people want to make it sound. Warzones, of course, are a different matter.

    --
    See charts for twitter trends on Trendistic
    1. Re:This is complete FUD by mooman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Argentina and Chile are pretty benign. It's a little nastier in the Central american area, Colombia probably being the worst, with Guatemala and Nicaragua behind.

      When I was younger (77-82) I lived in Panama, then Colombia. Panama had the Canal Zone back then and that was completely safe. Bogota on the other hand was not. Within one month of living there, our house was burglarized (while we were out for lunch) and had thousands of dollars of jewelry, cameras, and electronics taken. Oh, and a loaded 9mm.

      After that the embassy posted a 24hr armed guard on my doorstep. For every day of the next two years I had some guy in a uniform with a .38 revolver sitting outside my front door and walking me across the street to the schoolbus. The general next door to us had *two* guards with machine guns.

      About 6 months later (and a few hundred miles away) we had our van broken into and more stuff taken including *another* pistol.

      Most of the vehicles that the Embassy used or loaned out there had bullet-proof inserts behind the windows. Most of the moderate to high ranked Colombian officials had similar vehicles as well.

      I'd still like to go back and visit again someday, but would feel rather leery staying more than say a week or so. Iraq may be worse for more personal attacks, but Central America is still pretty high risk in several of the countries. But there are many that are probably fairly safe.. I just haven't kept track of which lately. For the latest, you should check out the travel warnings put out by the US Department of State...

      --
      In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
    2. Re:This is complete FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Its no wonder the terrorists all have guns. Its you damn fool Americans with your "right to arm bears" that causes all the trouble - see how you managed to give them TWO guns! What with that kind of iiresponsible behaviour and Arnie's "you have the right to remain dead" its not surprising that Al Quaida decided to copy the plot of "True Lies".

      "You have the write to be beheaded!"

    3. Re:This is complete FUD by T.Hobbes · · Score: 1
      I was in Nicaragua recently (2001-2002) for 5 months. As long as you stayed outside the capital, Managua, it was quite safe. Some cities more used to western tourists had higher rates of mugging (Esteli especially), but most cities were very safe. Most cities have few westerners that visit, and people are much more likely to want to practice their english with you than rob you. The main thing is to keep your head and not do stupid things, like walk around the slums at night with gold chains, for example. The capital, though, was nuts - 'good' and 'bad' parts of town were usually no more than 2-3 blocks apart, the murder rate really high (sorry, no stats), and there were dozens of gangs. Whenever I travelled in Managua, I both made sure I knew the path to where I was going, and travelled in a group if possible.

      But, like I say, that was the only place in the country I felt unsafe.

    4. Re:This is complete FUD by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

      I second that.
      I'm Argentinian and although the crime rate has gone higher after the devaluation (two years ago), I would not consider Buenos Aires as an unsafe place to be. Americans are not being kidnapped/killed just for being Americans.

      We do not like even a bit what you made in Iraq, but that doesn't mean that there's some sort of guerrilla here waiting to get guys like you. Just don't go everywhere boasting how you guys "liberated" Iraq, you'll get to see some angry faces if you do.

    5. Re:This is complete FUD by mooman · · Score: 1

      [Apologies for actually responding to an AC, but felt there were some points to clarify and I'm at work on a Saturday so might as well...]

      Well, if "giving them TWO guns" is how you interpret someone breaking into a locked house and someone else later into a locked van (that we had even paid someone to watch), then that's your prerogative.

      Another thing you're completely overlooking is that the right to bear arms is only extended in the United States. In other countries we have to adhere to their national laws regarding weapons.

      My father (to whom the pistols in question belonged) was an officer in the US military providing technical training about tracking inventory and supply logistics to the FAC (the Colombian Air Force). He was there at their request to help them computerize their operations. The pistols were issued either by the Embassy or the US military (I no longer recall) for self-protection in the clearly risky areas of Colombia. Colombia has no US bases, so we were living right in Bogota along with the 5 million or so other citizens. As I already pointed out, their own military leaders had even more blatantly armed guards (with a pair of M16 assault rifles on display at the house next to us). So why a pistol locked in our house elevates us to the level of "damn fool Americans", I guess I'm failing to see.

      And how you draw the connection that an event 23 years ago in Colombia has anything to do with an extremist Islamic group from Afghanistan I can't even grasp at all, so I'll just assume the posting was some just used as some opportunity to vent frustration about the current administration or something...

      --
      In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
  119. apparently not lazy assholes like you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At one time, teenagers did and they learned how to work. It's easy to see how the slacker generation came into being.

  120. Re:Show me the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...I only wish I was alongside him helping the people get out from under 30 years of oppression.."

    ...hmm... When Bush is finished installing his puppet government in Iraq and everything is all running smoothly, I wonder what oppressed nation the U.S.A will free next? After all their are quite a few... North Korea maybe? Or maybe not since they actually have WMD's... (and no oil to fund costly rebuilding projects to line the pockets of corporate America and the American economy.)

    The sad thing about a democracy is that it has to be *formed* democratically, not be forced upon a people as part of a "new world order". The majority have to fight for it. Something which is quite hard when you have a government using physical and psychological force to control the people.

    As a side note, it is amazing how easily a population can be controlled by fear. One year after 9/11 it seams everyone forgot about Osama and all that could be heard from the mainstream media was WMD's and Saddam.

    And for all the history buffs out there here is a quote that echoes the above point.

    "Of course the people don't want war... That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
    -Hermann Goering, Adolf Hitler's Deputy Chief and Luftwaffe Commander, at the Nuremberg trials, 1946 from "Nuremberg Diary" by G M Gilbert (Signet, New York, 1947).

  121. If it isn't Iraqis that penned the invite by meanroy · · Score: 1

    Which Iraquis? Or which Saudis, Afganies?

    If you are a government worker/contractor "you may notice a strong smell of politics in the room."

    If you're a private company worker, you're in the same boat. They get their money from a government agency.
    This has probably all been chewed over some where in the depths of 0.

    It's a War zone buddy. A distributed war. Pretty much covers the globe. The odds are different in different places don't ya know.
    If you're young and you think you're invincable, or just want to try to play the odds,

    Hey, be careful and good luck Dude
    ---
    Ya, Stephenson quote.

  122. Difficult question by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    We will have helped them if we succeed. If we fail, and someone else takes over the country we will have left the country worse off. It is becoming increasingly more likely that, at least with W at the helm, we will fail. We've allready pretty much lost Falluja. Reports from commanders on the front lines are almost allways dismal. Everyone there keeps telling the same story: we need more troops we need more money we need more everything. This just may be a nation building attempt we cannot afford from a funding standpoint.

    And before I get a few 'free the Iraqis' high horse people saying what a noble cause it is, where've you been when Africa or South America needed help. The U.S. does not, and cannot intervene on soley humanitarian grounds. We have neither the money, and probably as a result of this, the interest in it. Iraq, as far as terrible places to be in 2000 go, was far from the worst place and easily not the place where we'd get the most humanitarian bang for our buck.

    This war is nothing but the product of the idiotic neocons misguided policy. (notice how I didn't say conservatives, who were only steered out of their normally somewhat isolationist stance by said neocons).

    --
    Photos.
  123. There'll be no shelter here.... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    The front lines are everywhere! [Rage Against The Machine] /sorry, had to be said...

    1. Re:There'll be no shelter here.... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      So now I'm rollin' through Fallujah with a shotgun.

      These people ain't seen a white-skinned man since their grandparents caught one.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
  124. Re:might as well be a drug dealer by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

    I know you're trolling, but try to separate the actions of the military, and the actions of civilian workers who went there afterwards to *help* build and rebuild.

    Until I read this thread, I would have thought that civilians working on reconstruction over there would be acceptable and lauded by both sides of the political spectrum, both pro and anti-war.

    The war already happened; theres nothing we can do about that. I'd consider it immoral to *not* have Americans there to help.

    Or we could just have all the civilians leave; pull out the contractors, and leave the bombed out Iraqi people to their own devices.

    --
    -- My Sig is a P228.
  125. thank you Bill Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get rid of almost half the Army's combat divisions along with lots of others and we wonder why we're stretched thin.

  126. Re:I'm from the Private Sector, and I'm here to he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This American Life is not an NPR program.

  127. Networking in the Danger Zone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And, here all this time, I thought I was the only one who hacked away on a keybaord while listening to the Top Gun soundtrack...

  128. When you get killed.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...can I have your stuff?

  129. Detroit??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell fucking NO! I'd rather live in Iraq. At least I'd have a clue why someone was trying to kill me.

  130. Moot by Sebby · · Score: 1
    I see a lot of comments with "so what? we're all gonna die someday anyways"-type arguments

    Yeah, we will all die someday; maybe tomorrow, maybe 50,60 or 70 years from now. Could die of a heart attack, could die of a disease, could die in car crash. So those arguments are pretty moot I feel.

    The *important* thing is how you're going to die, and especially how it came about. I sure as hell don't want to die at the hands of someone that keeps me as a ransom for 3 days only to be beheaded in the end. And the last thing I want is for my family to live through such a thing.

    I'd much rather die from a disease, car crash, or other more 'natural' things than to have someone else take my life in such a horrible way.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  131. so riddle me this batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ihe Iraq linux user group story said that most of the people there are scared of being killed by bandits and other lowlife scum not to mention the news stories about lots of Iraqi's being killed & wounded by terrorists, much more so than Westerners. Sounds like everyone is a target

  132. Better dead than dying poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I overheard somebody say that and is partially true as everything in life, I just want to add a couple thoughts.

    When you work at those locations you are on your TOTALLY own, nobody will help you and you are between the sword and the wall. If you kill someone on self defense the locals will always see you as the KILLER?GUILTY and if they kill/mutilate you then nobody will forsee justice for you.

    On the other hand nobody would give you a job in your home town and your goverment would problably let you die poor in the most inhuman conditions. Apocalypse Now anyone?.

    Although some people say that something bad might happen to them back at home you surely won't face a horrid death like being shooted while you burst in flames even crossing the NY Bronx with a $ 1.000.000 dollars in your backpack, you are most likely to get shooted and that's it.

    A possible solution?, yes go there to work and hope for the best, if you see yourself at the end of the line get the balls to take a cianide pill or put a bullet in your head, or a more dramatic approach is to immolate yourself taking some bastards with you to the other side.

  133. Profiteers deserve death. by $kr1p7_k177y · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Those who hope to profit from the spoils of war deserve death.

    Do yourself (And the people in the beaten nation) a favor, and stay at home.

  134. Gosh... by crashfrog · · Score: 1

    ...but I can't help but think that running off to carpetbag in a war zone might not be the best idea.

    I mean, c'mon. People are killing and beheading people there. People just like you. This isn't some monty haul dungeon adventure, because they have the weapons and you don't.

    --
    I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
    If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
  135. Just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...tell everyone your Canadian.

  136. Re:Whatever happened to the Army Corps Of Engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You thought wrong. That's not what the Corps of Engineers is for. Try a little Googling before embarassing yourself. And moderators, you're on crack.

  137. Yep, they're okay. Except for the dead ones. by khasim · · Score: 1

    "(1) the idiot that authorized that kind of treatment should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law."

    That would be Bush or Rumsfeld or whom?

    "(2) those prisoners, although embarrassed, lived. they'll get over it."

    Except for the ones that were killed. And there are photos that show that.

    Not to mention the women that were raped. Seems Congress has access to pictures of THAT happening, too.

    "Go find someone that's been to Viet Nam, and ask them if they had an easy time telling who the Enemy was."

    So, it's okay to kill people who look different as long as they all look different in the same way?

    WTF?

    "In Iraq, most of the people are friendly enough. The few that are the problem cannot be picked out of a crowd based on their appearance."

    That's correct. Irrelevant, but correct.

    "Any time weapons are fired, they get nervous."

    That is an understandable response.

    "Given the nature of the environment, I'm actually more surprised that the people at this wedding party didn't have the sense to find another way to make noise, if they wanted to celebrate."

    Why? They celebrated in that fashion while Saddam was in charge. Aren't we supposed to be BETTER than Saddam?

    "I'll grant you that the RESPONSIBILITY ultimately falls on Bush (more on that in a second), but that does NOT mean that it was his call to do it."

    Responsibility is Responsibility.

    "When I served in the Navy, they taught us an important rule of leadership: You can delegate Authority, but you cannot delegate Responsibility. I think that speaks for itself."

    But nothing is happening to Bush. If he was responsible, shouldn't he be doing jail time for the crime?

    "I am sad that there are people that so hate President Bush that they are willing to blame him for every thing possible, all the while being completely blind to the facts at hand."

    But you just said that they taught you in the Navy that you cannot delegate Responsibility. So Bush is Responsible.

    So it isn't about people who "hate" Bush and "are willing to blame him for every thing possible".

    It is a matter of Responsibility.

    The question for YOU is "What does 'Responsibility' mean?"

    When I was in the Army, if one of my troops fucked up, _I_ was the one explaining the situation to my commander and _I_ was the one who dealt with the situation and _I_ was the one who made sure it did not happen again.

    Maybe it isn't people who "hate" Bush. Maybe it's just people who understand that "Responsibility" is not just a word.

  138. So he, like, died of embarassment? by khasim · · Score: 1

    Check out the photo of the chick next to the corpse.

    The bloody corpse.

    The bloody, bruised corpse.

    He died of "humiliation"?

  139. Goddammit, Moderators, do your job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? 5, Insightful? How about -1, Stoopid? Come on moderators, this asshat is making fools out of you! The whole "military-industrial complex" went out with Watergate. Sakusha is either living in the past or has been spending way too much time in Berkeley.

  140. American morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This American ponders how much money he can make and asks "is it safe?" Which epitomises a central aspect of the morally reprehensible nature of his society.

    The American people will be ready to apply for readmission into the ranks of humanity when guys like this have the decency to say;

    "Regardless of the personal benefits I might gain, I will not serve the cause of tyranny."

    The rest of us are appalled by your behaviour. Change or be damned.

    1. Re:American morality by Cmdr+TECO · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Ending the likes of this and this is "serving the cause of tyranny"?

      You, sir, are almost as much of an asshole as your idols.

      --
      echo 33676832766569823265328479713269.8639857989Pq | dc
  141. Re:I'm from the Private Sector, and I'm here to he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't say that it was an NPR program - he said that it was on NPR. If you're going to be pedantic, at least do it correctly.

  142. Re:Whatever happened to the Army Corps Of Engineer by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative
    I thought the whole point of having an Army Corps Of Engineers was so that when technical skills were needed in a war zone, the Army would be able to provide them.

    The CoE does mostly CIVIL engineering. Dams, flood control, and miscelaneous hydrology are their main contribution to infrastructure creation. They're mainly a construction corps. Anything requiring esoteric technical knowledge is generally contracted out to private companies that specialize in those sorts of things.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  143. that makes the iraqies the indians? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Taking as an example for how "nice" they are supposed to be the time they decimated the original population of their country. Either this guy doesn't know the real history of his country or he thinks that it truly is a glorious moment in its history.

    What is the difference between the american push to the west where they drove the original inhabitants of their land and put them in camps and killed a large amount of the population and the german push east where they drove the original inhabitants of their lands and put them in camps and killed them? Answer: The germans never named militairy hardware after races/tribes they wiped out. (Look at the names of US combat helicopters)

    And the guy is asking because he wants the money. I guess this will really be showing the true american to the iraq people. "Do anything in the name of the allmighty dollar".

    If all this sounds really nasty/trollish/flamebait then it is time to wake up. America has become very much an object of hate. Partly because it is an easy target, hating say holland would require you first to find a really detailed map and a magnifying glass, but mostly because its activisties during its existence have made it very clear on whose side america is. Its own. Give america a choice between something that will benefit the entire world or only america and the choice so far has been entirely clear.

    So taking this kinda job means working in an area where a tiny percentage will welcome you because they are directly benefitting from you. Where the fast majority just has a kinda low level hatred for you. They wouldn't do anything about it UNTIL the last group comes into play. The unknown percentage that hates you and blames you for everything. To whom you are the living devil. This has nothing to do with your race/color/religion. They bombed the U.N. killing people from every group.

    And the majority can easily be swayed into action by this group or at least not act to help should you come under attack.

    So the answer is. Sure go. The risk is not that great. Neither is the risk that great that if you put your finger in to a light socket you will really kill youreselve. Most of us still try to avoid doing so.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:that makes the iraqies the indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Indians fought back and it was over a few centuries instead of a few years.

      No body cares about the Dutch. Not even the Dutch, except that they can get stoned and fuck protitutes without worrying about getting arrested.

      Eurotrash hate the US because at one point in time, they had empires that spanned the globe, but are now basically insignificant. They would rather have the US not respond to attacks unless directed to do so like a dog on a leash. Heaven forbid that a country try to do what's best for itself.

  144. But you add to the risk by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Getting killed by a satellite is a global risk. Same really with say tripping over something and breaking your neck. These are normal risks we all have. Go to a warzone and you ADD to these basic risks a whole new load of risks. One of the silly things about wars is that an awfull lot of soldiers end up getting wounded by just plain accidents. Driving their jeep of the road. Something falling on their head in a repair shop etc etc. Choppers are a good example. They crash constantly and there was even 1 report I remember wich said that during actual war the risk was less because everyone was more alert to the risk and the level of training was higher (you don't send troops still in training to a warzone).

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  145. Convenience Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well would you rather be doing what you love in a dangerous country and get shot/blown-up/beheaded or be forced to take a crappy job at a convenience store and shot in the head by a two bit thug for thirty bucks?








    In all fairness I don't think I'd choose either. I'd rather get a job I like in a safe place.

    Yours Truly,
    AC

  146. I would definitely wear my T-Shirt... by ross.w · · Score: 1

    that says "I am not an American" in English and Arabic.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    1. Re:I would definitely wear my T-Shirt... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      that says "I am not an American"
      I got one of those ten years ago and gave it to a guy who was going on a trip through Africa. It seemed funny at the time - but now it's starting to look like a necessity to have some way of distinguishing yourself from Brits and Americans in a large slice of the world.
    2. Re:I would definitely wear my T-Shirt... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, I also found it necessary to put an Australian flag sticker on the back of my UK registered car to avoid road rage in France from people who assumed I was English.

      I have often heard complaints from Brits about how rude the French are, but I can tell you they change rapidly when they find out you are Australian. Maybe the novelty hasn't worn off yet.

      Getting back on topic, thanks to the "All the way with GWB" attitude of our respective Governments, being British or Australian is no guarantee the Middle East these days. Thanks Mr Blair, Thanks Mr Howard.

      Time to cultivate a NZ accent.
      Fashion chups
      Fashion chups

      Kia-ora Bro!

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    3. Re:I would definitely wear my T-Shirt... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Time to cultivate a NZ accent.
      One bizzare situtation in the recent travel book "Swahili for the Broken Hearted" is where the Australian author survives a riot unscathed in Ethiopia because the locals have been watching re-runs of "skippy the bush kangaroo", so they've heard of Australia, but nothing bad yet. At the same time a British backpacker was robbed and barely escaped with a minor stab wound when her attackers were distracted by her bag splitting open spilling the contents everywhere. If the locals had never heard of Australia he would have been seen as just another American or Brit and open to attack with little in the way of consequences for the attackers.

      It's bizzare, various US media and other groups couldn't have done a better job of making large parts of the world hate the USA if they had done it deliberately.

  147. Hell yeah! by khasim · · Score: 1

    Losing your house and then paying the guy who wrecked it to help rebuild it is so much more intelligent than.....

    hiring an exterminator?

    The world (as a whole) is better off without Saddam's government.

    Individual Iraqis are not. Some are dead. Some are maimed.

    The US economy certainly isn't better off.

    Suppose you have a brother and you give your brother $50 to bring back beer for you both for the weekend. He brings back 1 bottle. Would you think your brother was...
    a.) a very shrewd shopper
    or
    b.) an idiot who just paid $50 for a bottle of beer

    You can "solve" a "problem" in a completely idiotic fashion and spend way too much time and money and LIVES doing so.

    1. Re:Hell yeah! by jacoby · · Score: 1

      Do you know anything about the rebuilding period post-WWII for either Japan or Germany?

    2. Re:Hell yeah! by martinde · · Score: 1

      > Losing your house and then paying the guy who wrecked it to help rebuild it is so much more intelligent than.....

      > hiring an exterminator?

      Well, in this case the house is already gone. Are we charging individual Iraqis to rebuild? I don't think we are. In fact, I recall a big issue in the news about the cost that we are paying to rebuild Iraq, to the tune of $87B. So I don't think that MOST of the money is coming even from Iraqi oil. (Some is, except that terrorists keep making it hard to pump oil.)

      So, is it immoral (now that the infrastructure is damaged) to reach into our own pockets and pay US contractors to rebuild it? The guy who says "pay Iraqis to do it" is right, but... Who's going to qualify them to do the jobs. If Joe Blow Iraqi walks up and says "I'm a pipefitter, I'll work for $x/hour" who is going to oversee him? Some pencil-pushing US government official? Would you have any clue if someone was doing a good job building a pipeline, wiring a building, pouring cement, building a road?

      I think you're going to need some people with "domain knowledge" on the ground over there. If you have some way of qualifying Iraqis for these positions as well, then more power to you and them... For all I care, give them the money to start a company as long as they can scale up quick enough. (Is the banking system in place? Will the payroll be handled efficiently? It's not an easy task.) But don't act like this is a simple problem with a simple solution.

      I might not be happy with the war, the motivations for starting it, with Haliburton, or the current US administration... But I can see the need for some significant US involvement in the rebuilding now that the damage is done.

  148. connections 3 by olscratch69 · · Score: 1

    I would just like to say that the rumor that there was a connection between Iraq and Alquada is true. There has been evidence found that there was a man that worked for Saddam whose name I forget who attended the meetings that planned not only the attacks on the World Trade center but also on the attack against the USS Cole in Yemen and some embassy in the sudan. Also I think it might be too dangerous for contractors in the Iraq right now. It is like help building the Death Star in Return of the Jedi. The worst of it is not over. The violence will go on for some time.

  149. No apparent reason??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was part of the occupation dude !! Does the Iraqi resistance need any other reason???

    1. Re:No apparent reason??? by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 1

      Except he worked for Lockheed in Saudi Arabia...

      oi.

  150. No way! by d_jedi · · Score: 1
    You couldn't get me to go over there for a million dollars.

    Those terrorists are barbaric savages.. the lowest form of life on Earth.

    No f*cking way I'd go over there. Ever.

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  151. I hear their headcount is getting low by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    Wow, the timing for such an article.

    On the other hand, I hear they're hiring an Apache technician...

    Problem with that type of position is the headhunters don't take no for an answer.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  152. Re:Whatever happened to the Army Corps Of Engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dams, flood control, and miscelaneous hydrology are [the Corps'] main contribution to infrastructure creation.

    Actually, in Iraq, the Corps is working to: restore oil production, restore electricity, dispose of enemy munitions, build bases for the US military, and build bases for the Iraqi military.

  153. Would you be ready to die for them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you be ready to die for KBR/Halliburton to make money? Why not, is there no sin in making money, even if it demands the death of many people?

    1. Re:Would you be ready to die for them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you be ready to die for KBR/Halliburton to make money?

      Not me, but Halliburton's employees sure as hell are.

      Why not, is there no sin in making money, even if it demands the death of many people?

      Aye, maybe it is a sin but
      "let's rebuild Iraq for profit" doesn't necessarily imply that they're killing people for money. That's the army's job!

  154. Training by xulphlux · · Score: 1

    Be sure and practice up on your minesweeper skills.

  155. "perked" by kevcol · · Score: 1

    I continue to have my curiosity perked

    So why didn't he bother to have it PIQUED instead?

  156. A Weekend by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1


    Spent a weekend in the house of a mil contractor, he asked if i could drive a truck - I said yes. He asked if I would like $250,000 tax free income, yes. He laughed, he said he liked me too much to give me a job. Be forewarned.

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  157. personal experience by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1

    I lived & worked in Israel for 2 years, all up and down the country. The most frightening time I had was the first two weeks, during which every ride on a public bus was an adventure in paranoia. Then I started to relax. After all, you're surrounded by soldiers *who are on your side*. Yes, they could be a little rude. Yes, there is a bit of a culture shock. At the end of the day, if you are the kind of person who can adapt well to new environments and not let your loved ones back home make you stress out then I say go for it. The only thing I feel I should strongly reccomend is get to learn the local language. There's nothing worse than feeling alone in a crowd of friends when they all start speaking the local tongue.

  158. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  159. Friends in hostile area? by Xeno555 · · Score: 1

    Try as you might, "most" Americans can never blend in to a middle east country.

    1: Your white and taller than the local population.
    2: Your car or issued car is not what the locals drive.
    3: You don't speak the language.
    4: You don't dress like the locals.
    5: You have more money than the locals.

    So you can be identified while in public with ease. Do the wrong people take notice of you after you have been there for a few days/weeks? {of course}. Do they know who you work for and what you do? {of course, after a little intel gathering}. Those local friends you meet might be the one(s) gathering intel on you. If not then they might talk to their friends that are {weather they know it or not}

    Are you a target? Well it depends on how easy a target you are, and how many targets they compair you to.

    So why does the muslum factions hate Americans so much, well in short they hate isral more then they do us, and we are allied with isral and are infidels.

    A quote:

    The Muslim attitude toward Jews is reflected in various verses throughout the Koran, the holy book of the Islamic faith. "They [the Children of Israel] were consigned to humiliation and wretchedness. They brought the wrath of God upon themselves, and this because they used to deny God's signs and kill His Prophets unjustly and because they disobeyed and were transgressors" (Sura 2:61). According to the Koran, the Jews try to introduce corruption (5:64), have always been disobedient (5:78), and are enemies of Allah, the Prophet and the angels (2:9798)

  160. in the north of scotland... by evil_one666 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Coming from the north of scotland, the main employer in recent years has been north sea oil. Traditionally, work on offshore platforms has yeilded very high financial rewards for people in occupations that would not necessarily be so highly rewarded elsewhere. As the population of northern scotland have gained valuable oil-related skills, they have been called upon to take contacts in "high risk" places, such as Nigeria, Angola, Columbia, and other locations in the middle east, africa, and central america.

    Now- heres the rub. You would think that kidnappings, hikackings, and detainment by rougue governments are things that you hear about on the news, yet dont generally happen very often

    If you think this, then you are wrong

    I can think of at least three things that have happened to people I know in these situations (NOTE: not things I have heard OF, or people I know OF- then we would be here all day). 1) a hijacking of an oil platform off of angola 2) kidnapping in colombia (lasted more than a year) 3) 2 year incarceration by corrupt government officials in nigeria.

    However

    As a former oil worker myself, I can safely say that the dangers posed by political instability are nothing compared to the health and safety hazards posed in these danger zones. Health and safty in the british sector of the north sea is bad, but health and safety in many parts of the world is basically non existant.

    This is far more likely to kill you that political violence, even in a reletively sheltered job such as network engineer,

  161. President Bush says President Bush is great! by MacFury · · Score: 1
    According to President Bush

    According to President Bush, President Bush has never made a mistake. Also, should a mistake be made, President Bush will be unable to recall the mistake or any events that happened before and after said mistake. President Bush also would like you to know that any fact brought forth must meet with President Bush's approval. Failure of the fact to be approved makes the fact false. Only President Bush approved facts will be considered truthful.

    1. Re:President Bush says President Bush is great! by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      You're welcome to post a news article or other similar quote as evidence that Bush was lying when he said that.

  162. I work in Kuwait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently I am working for a US company in Kuwait. I am doing system integration for a network management project at a telecom here. That's why I'm here. It is my experience that Kuwait is relatively safe. One hears reports in the local papers about threats, but the Kuwaiti security is fairly tight. I also go on weekend trips sometime to Bahrain as it is close and you can consume alcohol there (Kuwait is "officially" dry ;-). Bahrain is again relatively safe. Bahrain is where Saudis go to drink alcohol as well, as there is a 30 kilometer bridge that connects to two countries. So I've met and talked with a few Saudis and they were very friendly and said it is a small group that cause these problems.

    That being said, I've met more than one westerner on his way out of Saudi. I would not go there, but Kuwait, Bahrain or Dubai (UAE) are probably safer than walking the streets of most major US cities. You definitely want to avoid places like Saudi and Iraq obviously, but also Yemen (from what I'm told by my Kuwaiti colleagues.). Some other places you may consider in the Middle East is Oman, Qatar and Lebanon. I've been told that Beirut is a very nice place these days (the war ended almost 15 years ago) and it has a European feel to the city. Personally if I had the opportunity (which I just might) I would choose either Dubai, UAE or Beirut, Lebanon.

    Sorry if I rambled a bit, I just returned from a weekend in Bahrain 8)

  163. Your math is plain wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You say that the 100 contractors ran up a $1m bill in 3 months? Yes, that is $10k per night, but not per person. That's $100/night for each person - not bad for 4 stars. Considering these are financial people who might have other credentials, they probably would not go there if they had to sleep in tents. I sure as hell would not.

    I'm no fan of halliburton, especially the way it compensates cheney (bribery anyone?). But where is the waste here? Some things are just more expensive when you look at your costs.

    1. Re:Your math is plain wrong by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please explain where the math is wrong. I didn't say it was 10K for a person for a night, it was 100 people at $100 a night. I think the whole point is, and the army apparently agreed, is that it isn't exactly right to take a huge staff on an extended assignment, alongside soldiers living in tents, thinking you rate putting your entire staff in a five star hotel for the duration, at the tax payers expense. Halliburton/KBR signed up to work for the Army, alongside the Army, they get paid well for it so they should be living like the Army lives and like the Army tells them to.

      All in all its more than a little excessive. Rent some god damn apartments if nothing else.

      They just don't make war profiteers like they used to.

      --
      @de_machina
  164. Re:I hear their headcount MOD UP: FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hah hah.very good :)

  165. Heard about the new Arab Apache helicopter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's got a head-off display.

  166. Hitler ... Poland; Bush ... Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, Hitler was defending Germany when he invaded Poland as well. But his "evidence" was a bit more professionally forged compared to that bad piece of theatre you guys pulled this time.

  167. In Kuwait right now by ChiefArcher · · Score: 1

    I'm in Kuwait right now... Doing a UNIX admin gig.

    I live off base.. I survive... I've paid off all my debt. :)

    Survivor,
    ChiefArcher

  168. It's a NO-GO zone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a US company that makes the process computers & networks that control a lot of the big oil refineries. There is a lot of money that can be made in Iraq/Kuwait/Saudi, but a the moment we are moving all people out of the area. Only a skeleton group of people is left behind in Dubai that will try to do some local support. All other support will be done by dialing into the systems via old fashioned phoneline. These days it is safer to hook your plant control network to a phone line than to send out an engineer to site.

    Walking around in Iraq/Saudi is not worth the risk at this moment. The attack last month on the office in Saudi that killed 22 people, that was supposed to be a secure facility. Yes we had our people in there and yes they are dead now.

  169. Skin color is important by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think that the risk to you would be much reduced if you weren't obviously US/Euro from the white skin. I'm willing to bet a man of color would blend in better, draw less attention, garner fewer death threats, and still make the same, great pay.

    1. Re:Skin color is important by Arker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Skin colour can be an element, but I think you put far too much emphasis on it. I'm guessing your from the states where it has a great import. But in Iraq, or Afghanistan? Many of the natives are probably whiter than most USians, at least underneath the tan (which can, of course, be acquired.) Plenty of blue-eyed 'aryan' types in both these places - in fact a man of colour would stand out much more in either area than a blue-eyed nordic type with a good tan, because the indigenous population in both places is predominantly caucasian, and there is no indigenous negro element in either place.

      What's much more important in terms of standing out is how you dress and how you act. If you can speak the local language, or at the very least Arabic which is something of a lingua franca throughout the region, you've got a huge advantage. If you can dress like the locals and walk like you belong there, you're not likely to stand out as a target regardless of skin colour.

      Nonetheless, neither place is at all safe for westerners, particularly ones carrying blue passports, regardless of skin colour or even linguistic ability. There is a lot to be said for travelling to broaden your worldview, but right now Iraq and Afghanistan would not be on my list of places to go.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:Skin color is important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, stupid? Here in the Great White North of Michigan we have plenty of arab people (see Dearborn). This isn't the best site in the world to get a tan and I don't see all these arabs turning 'white' after living here over the winter. Maybe if they move to the U.P. they'll turn stark white, start eating pasties and saying eh' at the end of every sentence.

    3. Re:Skin color is important by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately even if you dress like the locals and speak the languages, you're still likely to get blown to smithereeens in Iraq. Many of the recent attacks have harmed Iraqis themselves. Also, as a networking contractor, you'll be driving around in convoys, living in contractors' accommodation, etc, etc, all of which make you a clear target.

    4. Re:Skin color is important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...a man of color...

      Um, sorry, but I have color in my skin. I may be caucasuian/european in my descent, but the skin isn't transparent.

      That's the stupidest race identifying euphemism yet.

    5. Re:Skin color is important by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Chyea, right. Check your history pal. Negros never get taken hostage. It's sort of an undocumented benefit of being black.

      I can see the phone call now :
      Terrorist : Allah Akbar! We have taken this contractor hostage, and if you do not set our terrorist friends in Gitmo free we will chop his head off.
      US Embassy : What you say! OMFG! Let us see the videos.
      T : Here you go, do what we say or we chop his black head right off.
      US E : (watches video)
      US E : You took a black guy hostage?
      T : Yea, so we got a deal or what? ... ...
      T : Hello? ... ...
      T : Hello? ... ...
      T : Shit, I think they hung up on me.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    6. Re:Skin color is important by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a fairly common term, so take it to mean what it's meant to.

    7. Re:Skin color is important by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      I think his point was that not everyone in the middle east is an Arab.

    8. Re:Skin color is important by ksheff · · Score: 1

      nah, they'll just enslave them like they've been doing for centuries before the Europeans.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  170. Mercenary by poptones · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I can't believe how most in this thread seem to see it only about money. It's NOT just about money. Consider how you'd feel if France or even Egypt overran your country and was occupying it - would you not feel anger toward your "captors?" Would you not do everything you could to cause them to run away?

    Whether you think the "state" argument applies here or not, realize it ain't just about the money. For $100k a year are you willing to become part of an occupying force? To the natives that's what you will represent, and all your income will be tainted with the blood both of the natives who died in the occupation and of the "allied" soldiers who died not for the money, but because they thought it their duty to be there when their country asked.

    To quote Rick Blaine: I don't mind a parasite; I object to a cut-rate one.

    1. Re:Mercenary by HexRei · · Score: 1

      Consider how you'd feel if France or even Egypt overran your country and was occupying it - would you not feel anger toward your "captors?" Would you not do everything you could to cause them to run away?

      If, 30 years ago, Saddam Hussein had taken over our country by force, brutally slaughtering the previous regime, I think I'd have a lot less concern about that government being removed.

      it's not like he was legitimate and sovereign.

    2. Re:Mercenary by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      You're right; its not just about the money. What about those who thought it was their duty to go there to help rebuild? Diplomats, or contractors who are rebuilding and revamping important infrastructure like water and electricity? To most natives, they would represent an individual who is helping.

      To the minority of TERRORISTS and insurgents, they might represent a threat, but then, we all do. You're making sweeping generalizations and invalid analogies.

      To extend your analogy, imagine if Bush instituted martial law, eliminated elections, and stayed in power for 20 years. You could get shot if he ever found out that you may have voted for Gore in the past. He might have his lapdogs, and those who remain loyal to him. 20 years later, france or Germany invade the US to dispose of Bush the Dictator, and then send in private contractors to help rebuild after the war, while maintaining a military presence to ensure security and safety, and to hunt down the leader of the insurrection, Rush Limbough.

      Would EVERYONE in the country hate the "invaders", or would a good many in the country see them as liberators? Would that hatred extend to those sent to rebuild? Only for the minority with hate so ingrained in their hearts, for those so brainwashed, or so much to lose.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    3. Re:Mercenary by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Although I disagree with the original poster - going to Iraq as a civilian contractor can be about doing a good thing for the Iraqi people, I also disagree with your analogy.

      The problem with your analogy is that in Iraq, the "liberators" are the closest and most vocal ally of a third country, a country that, on a daily basis, is shown on television killing people that a majority of the Iraqi population have great sympathy for if not directly identify with. We don't see that footage played at all over here in the USA, but in the middle-east video of palestinian suffering and death is shown over and over again (because it "sells" just like Fox News "sells" over here).

      It doesn't matter if the video is biased and one-sided or not. All that matters is that it has a huge, visceral impact on the people in Iraq and the rest of the middle east and thus their perceptions of the trustworthiness of the USA. Of course there are other factors that lead Iraqis to be mistrustful, but I figured I'd stick one nice big example to make the point.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Mercenary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for $100k/year, but for $50k/month, I'd seriously consider it.

  171. Work in Iraq for a Polish citizen by elh_inny · · Score: 1

    Where can I possibly apply?
    "The Department of Defense is seeking to hire highly skilled and deeply motivated U.S. citizens to work as civilians"
    Any help is appreciated.

  172. fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all we need is US government issue baseball bats with ``nigger beater'' engraved in them. that will show everyone.

  173. Diferent POV by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    "Has anyone survived such a trip and lived to tell the tale with a fat wallet?"

    "Better to be tortured by a leash and a polaroid than have your friggin head cut off."

    "You are indeed pioneers! It's like the ole west over there with money to be made in the face of great danger."

    Im just starting to understand why they hate us so much. They have competent geeks themselves but their jobs are being out-sourced already, they don't all agree with the people who go around abducting everyone but yet they get equal blame. I know not everyone here agrees with bombing the crap out of everything they have to catch afew assholes but you have to see from their point of view - rebuilding Iraq means rebuilding it for them, thats why we're there right? to help a country get rid of a dictator and get back on its feet? not to make lots of money for ourselves? - your profit comes last in the equation, the world isnt all capitalism.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  174. Money for Nothing by tacocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that most of the people who do these kind of "offshore ventures" are not doing it just for the money. There are a lot of other valuable things you can receive from a job besides money.

    Statistically speaking, I think you have a better chance of getting killed in America through one of our favorites (heart disease, automobile, gunshot) then you do getting beheaded in the Middle East. However, if you are killed in the Middle East you will probably enable your loved ones a brighter future through public sympathy donations and potential gigs on television.

    But the people who do this kind of work are doing it because they are trying to make a difference in the world and they believe that they are on the side of GOOD.

    If you do this, do it not because of your wallet, but because of your conscience. Think who you might become as the result of this experience.

  175. What about crossing the road? by kzadot · · Score: 1

    Hi. I was thinking about crossing the street, to get to the other side. But it seems what with people getting run over all the time, I just wonder, is it worth it? I mean more people die crossing the street than they do being contracters in Iraq, so I suspect its not worth trading my life in just to get to the other side. I am thinking it will be best to stay on this side of the street.

    What do you all think?

  176. US Citizenship / Security Clearance by aallamaa · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    I've seen so much job like that in the security field, but the fact is that you need to be American, and you need to have an active security clearance.
    So those jobs are only for Americans... I find it unfair because those jobs are not located in the US, and the bill will not be paid by Americans...

    I am half french and half Algerian, I guess that it would be useless for me to send my resume to those companies...

  177. Why are there soldiers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    - oil
    - personal agenda
    - personal vendeta
    - media misdirection

    summary :
    - money
    - power

  178. What's wrong with making money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you stupid?

    We all need money to live. More money means more comfortable life, usually. If you don't want the job, fine. Companies need to make money to keep investors - like me.

    I doubt anyone in Halliburton or any other organization being paid is there for only 1 reason. That is an extremely simplistic way of thinking.

    The USA has an all voluntee military, but they get paid. Does that make them in Iraq just for the money?

    I do fine the idea of outsourcing techincal skills to foreign workers interesting, oh, but then the democratic congress will blame the republicans for not using US based companies. Geez, you can't win for being a company willing to accept a government contract in a war zone.

    I ask again, "Are you stupid?"

  179. It's not as bad as they want you to think. by pcx · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to lie and say a job in Saudi Arabia or Iraq or anywhere in the middle east or central asia is going to be either easy or perfectly safe but then again neather is a job in LA or New York.

    One thing is perfectly true however and that is the media has an agenda and is skewing the reports out of the region to fit that agenda (remember quagmire reports three days into the ground assault?)

    One thing you can do to really get on top of the situation is to check out the Iraqi blogs, those tell the true story, the story filtered by people just like you and me, not somebody who's greatest ambition in life is to get President Bush out of office.

    http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/

  180. What about antarctica? by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have you considered going to a desolate place instead of a war zone?

    I don't know if there's much chance of you getting a job there (I've known a guy who got an offer, but they wanted him for engineering duties), but it might be another option. The offer was from our government (Argentinian), about US100000. And he said that was cheap. Maybe there's some IT jobs to be done there. He didn't take it, though. Didn't like the mandatory appendix extraction.

    You won't get that kind of money now here, but maybe some commonwealth government (the British have an importante presence there), or the Americans could make an offer.

    It's going to be hard to get, networking stuff can be usually done remotely (I'm a netadmin myself), but there might be a chance.

  181. Go for it dude by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    ...And if your wind up with a capinyaass, thanks in advance for the job opening.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  182. Insight from someone keyed into the process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I haven't been in Baghdad, as a disclaimer. However, I am quite likely going to serve a 2-3 month stint there sometime in '05. The contract I'm working on (and this is tech geek computer stuff) has a continual Baghdad presence, so here's what I know.

    First off, if you want to work in a tech geek capacity you're most likely going to need a security clearance. These aren't things you pick up overnight! The investigations usually take about 1-2 years (sometimes longer), require lots of paperwork, have personalized background checks (they'll talk to your coworkers and neighbors), and so on and so forth. Maybe there's a way to super expedite things. I know expediting it usually means '12-15 months' instead of '24 months'. There's interim clearances you can get quicker that might work. Also, you can't just walk down to NSA and ask for a clearance, you'll need a sponsor. In addition to time and resources these things are costing someone money. Maybe if you don't have a clearance you could work in an unclassified environment for a couple months while getting an interim, and I imagine there are some jobs that don't need it, but the folks I'm aware of in Baghdad and Afghanistan need one.

    Second off, ask lots of questions. Figure out where you're going. Where you'll be living. How much travel you'll be doing. What the security arrangement is. Standard line is that you're unarmed as a contractor. Now, maybe some people get their hands on guns, I don't know, but I can't imagine the soldiers are going to like you toting one around a secured base if you're not supposed to have one. They don't want to risk friendly fire incidents, someone starting a huge flare-up because they aren't following Rules of Engagement, etc. That said, I plan on getting some experience at civilian equivalents of what's commonly used over there. It's not like I plan on shooting but if something really really bad happened, it'd be nice to know that I had the option. Probably if all hell breaks loose you can find a gun.

    Now, travel. There are different things you can be doing over there. I'm familiar most with Baghdad. But if you check out this link and the section on 'Coalition Facilities' midway down you can see there's a lot of soldiers and bases large and small over there. Camp Victory North is the safest from what I hear. It's the biggest, it's the closest to the airport, it has a Burger King at the PX. :) You're unlikely, as a contractor, to get shot there (though we had a guy who was, but it was a freak occurrence and a very minor wound) or blown up if you're not hanging around the gates. But there are other bases, mentioned in the article. Are you going to need to travel between them? That, boys and girls, is where you're at most risk. Find out the details on how often, and by what means. There are convoys, and no they don't all get blown up, but yes some of them do. Armor on your humvees can protect against some things. You'll probably have a flak jacket. That won't help in the case of an IED (Improvised Explosive Device), though. Neither will a gun. There's also helicoptors but those are much less likely to be used. Personally, those are my preference.

    I could ramble on and on but I'll ony ramble a bit more. There's a lot of things to think about but why you're there is a big one. Sure, there's money, and that's a good draw for a lot of people. If you're risking your life (and you are) it helps if there's more than money motivating you. At the least, you don't want to be against the situation over there, or you will be miserable and so will those around you. If you're going over there to help build infrastructure for the country, fine. If you're going over there to help protect Coalition lives, great. If you're going over there to get a bunch of money and think the whole Iraq thing is a big screw-up that you in no way support except for the desire to make a buck, I'd seriously reconsider.

    Oh, and one final note: Royal Air

  183. Sooo much by Etherael · · Score: 1

    I love the education programs from the same software houses that actually develop faulty software *AND INCLUDE* bug fixes and workarounds to current problems in their training criteria rather than actually fixing the problem at the software level so that a human wouldn't need to be expressly educated to deal with this exact problem.

    This, in my opinion, is the fundamental flaw in all aspects of IT training, humans interfacing with computers add value by being flexible and intelligent in a way that a computer cannot be, I have seen my share of certified professionals who have been no more educated than the simple memorising of reams upon reams of troubleshooting and errata manuals, a simple google on a given problem instantly negates their advantages, whereas others that have trained long and hard to understand the underlying principles of development and administration, although they would be unlikely to bother with acquiring a certification in a given product, have skills which are quite simply put, priceless.

    Give me one clever, wily hacker over a thousand MCSE monkeys and a hundred Ivy League accredited CS students.

    And to hell with formal accreditation.

  184. Maybe it's time... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... for the CoE to develop some more capabilities. If you think hydrology and infrastructure are easy, you don't know much about them. The problems also gets exponetially harder when you are expected to be able to work in environments ranging from dessert to jungle.

    If the CoE can handle civil, it can learn most IT tasks.

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Maybe it's time... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I didn't say the CoE had only "easy" jobs, nor did I imply that they wouldn't be able to handle building IT infrastructure if they had the proper training and equipment. I'm merely pointing out that IT engineering isn't what the CoE does. The United States Army Information Systems Engineering Command (USAISEC), not the CoE, handles all the Army's IT needs. The point is, the military isn't really designed as a big public works department, so they're not particularly well suited to rebuilding things like country-wide communications networks. That's why they hire civilian contractors.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  185. In the worst case... by bluGill · · Score: 1

    In the worst case and they do behead you, please have the guts to die as a martyr. Just before the ax falls (or before they gag you, and hope the camera catches it) pull a Patric Henry. No it isn't the revolutionary war, and all that. Still you can spoil their tape by turning your dieing words into a heroes stance. Consider your words carefully. ("You will now see how an Italian dies" was apparently used, though I can't recall the story)

    Odds are it won't happen to you. Pray and whatever else you do that you will be safe. But if you must die please don't turn it into a good PR move for bad guys.

  186. I would by CompilerLite · · Score: 1

    I would personally go. The reasoning is that I was formally in the U.S. Army infantry and have some knowledge of the region. As for the risks, well their risks. I would recommend you do alot of reading on the region before you ever go. You need to understand the culture and people. It's a risky choice but the stories you could tell afterwards would live with you forever.

  187. Osama also built schools. by khasim · · Score: 1

    "Yes, and that would only take a couple of, what, DAYS, surely? CERTAINLY they could cope without infrastructure until THEN!"

    While it would take longer than DAYS, it would still happen faster than the US rebuilding it.

    Who do you think FIRST built the stuff we bombed? It was the Iraqis. They already know how to build the roads / schools / hospitals / etc.

    "No, they couldn't. Come to think of it, though, training native people to build their infrastructure is probably why schools are being built, yes?"

    If you take the long term (10 years) view, then that is an acceptable answer. So you view sending a kid to kindergarten as training someone to build a hospital?

    "Just as the US had a responsibility to remove Saddam after they were the ones who put him in power, they are the ones who have the responsibility to begin forward momentum in rebuilding infrastructure in Iraq."

    We removed him in a very IRRESPONSIBLE manner. We did NOT have a plan for stabilizing the country AFTER.

    So our "responsibility to begin forward momentum in rebuilding infrastructure in Iraq" does NOT include huge salaries for US citizens.

    Our responsibility is to get the Iraqis building and maintaining their own country NOW.

    "Am I ticked about the probability of wrongdoing with Haliburton contracts? Yes."

    While I just find the use of the term "wrongdoing" to be amusing. It sounds like something a 6 year old would say. Why not call it a "crime" or something?

    "But that doesn't mean that my knee-jerk response is to say the US shouldn't be helping."

    Nice try.
    We also were "helping" when we funded Saddam's war against Iran.

    We also were "helping" when we funded Saddam's chemical weapons program.

    We also were "helping" when we rounded up and tortured those Iraqis.

    Isn't about time we stopped "helping"? Isn't it about time we turned Iraq over to the Iraqis?

    "And helping, they are. Many people in Iraq already now live much, much better than they ever have."

    Anytime the government changes, some people move up and some move down. I'm not interested in a select sub-group. I want the AVERAGE Iraqi to be better off.

    If we were doing so much good for the AVERAGE Iraqi, we would NOT have lost Fallujah, which, on 19 June 2004, we are STILL firing missles at.

    http://kutv.com/topstories/topstories_story_1710 94 117.html

    Almost every dictator has built schools. That is no accomplishment.

    1. Re:Osama also built schools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus dude. Is this all you do on your posts? Learn to make a statement instead of picking other's apart. You're a joke and your post(s) proves it.

  188. It just doesn't get any better than this. by khasim · · Score: 1

    "Look, numbers don't lie. Plain facts don't lie. Last December, the story broke that the homicide rate in Baghdad had fallen to below the largest American cities. If you took the military casualties out of the equation, the Baghdad murder rate was lower than any American city."

    Check out the FIRST PARAGRAPH of that story. :D

    "The latest crime statistics for Baghdad show its murder rate is lower than that of any major U.S. city -- if anti-coalition attacks are discounted."

    IF ANTI-COALITION ATTACKS ARE DISCOUNTED.

    IF ANTI-COALITION ATTACKS ARE DISCOUNTED.

    IF ANTI-COALITION ATTACKS ARE DISCOUNTED.

    So, if a US citizen went to Baghdad and was killed, would that death be counted in the story you referenced?

    No (most likely).

    Because someone killing that person would PROBABLY be counted as "anti-coalition".

    So, what you are ACTUALLY saying is ... ... "If we don't count people like you being killed, then the statistics for people like you being killed are very low."

    Nice try. But I seem to understand statistics far better than you. :)

    1. Re:It just doesn't get any better than this. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Check out the FIRST PARAGRAPH of that story

      Um... yeah. That's what I said. I said that if you take out the military casualties, the Baghdad homicide rate is lower than any US city. Right. That's exactly what I said.

      Maybe if you read more than just the first sentence, looking for new information to enlighten you than for some angle to try to argue, then you might learn something.

      So, if a US citizen went to Baghdad and was killed, would that death be counted in the story you referenced?

      If that US citizen was a member of the Coalition--that is, one of the 138,000 American or Coalition troops, or one of the few dozen remaining CGA personnel--then that citizen's death would be tallied as part of an "anti-Coalition attack." Otherwise, then it's just a homicide.

      Nice try. But I seem to understand statistics far better than you. :)

      OK, man. Whatever you say.

      --

      I write in my journal
  189. Reduce risks of beheading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Muslim drag is easy: Wear a bourka. You're less likely to be a target for al-Qaeda execution if you're a woman, since the Koran dictates that the dog-does-not-bite-bitch rule is supposed to operate in jihad. Male enemies get killed and I think female ones are supposed to be captured and enslaved. Plus a bourka would relieve you of any worry about the naughty slogans on your favorite t-shirts offending the locals.

    ac

  190. So to calculate the risk premium... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ...as a rule of thumb, you can figure that 1 in 5 people THERE want to bust your brain bucket...and maybe 1 in 100 people HERE want to. Therefore, the risk of being brained there is 20x risk of being brained HERE. Therefore the pay there should be 20x what it is here to account for the risk.

    Is it?

  191. Re:Whatever happened to the Army Corps Of Engineer by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    Actually, in Iraq, the Corps is working to: restore oil production, restore electricity, dispose of enemy munitions, build bases for the US military, and build bases for the Iraqi military.

    Sorry. Didn't mean to imply that they only do flood control. I was just citing what, historically, has been their main contribution-- they "leveed up" the entire mississippi river, for example. As I stated in the above post, their main job is CONSTRUCTION. You know, bulldozers, concrete, backhoes, and the like. IT infrastructure is one thing they DON'T do. The United States Army Information Systems Engineering Command (USAISEC) does that.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  192. I have to weigh in on this one by The+Tyro · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was forward-deployed during the early phase of the Afghanistan war, and the KBR guys were great.

    In case you were unaware, these contractors keep guys on the ground in those countries; some of them have been there for 20 years or more. These are local people who live there, speak the language, and are employed/paid by these companies to maintain caches of equipment, buildings, etc... these companies don't just fly in a bunch of pale-faces, rake in the cash, and fly out.

    They subcontract with a lot of local people to cook food, do construction, and all manner of services for the military, and they do a fair job of it. They maintain a lot of relationships... It's probably a little unfair to simply characterize them as profiteering gluttons (and no, I don't work for them, never have, and don't plan to).

    Contractors provide a lot of services, and while they certainly do it for a profit, that's no different from 99% of people in a capitalist system. Doing things out of the goodness of your heart is very noble, but money's a powerful motivator, and people going out into a war zone to do a job (particularly if they're providing expertise that the Iraqis need) should get a fair wage... I'd say they're earning it.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:I have to weigh in on this one by demachina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All I'd say to this is I'm sure a lot of them are nice people I'm just not sure I'd agree this is the way to fight a war. In particular, if you are fighting an insurgency using locals to cook for your army and do all your construction isn't a particularly good idea. A few well placed infiltraters and your Army is screwed.

      Using contractors to interrogate prisoners is an even better example of how deeply flawed it is for an Army to be at the mercy of profiteers for critical services. You can't make them answer for their actions the way you can a soldier.

      I think the $200 billion dollar, and counting, price tag on this war suggests dependence on money is no object contracting is proving to be pretty expensive.

      You also can't count on contractors if the going gets rough.

      All in all I'd say if you are going to fight a war build an army to do it, or don't do it in the first place.

      --
      @de_machina
  193. I've traveled for twenty years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but since day one have always chosen destinations carefully. Even at that though, I've found myself in sticky situations from time to time as the company once having you overseas would press for side trips in the name of urgency or expediency. Generally, I find Europe and Asia to be my prefered destinations. I turned down Middle East assignments twenty years ago and every opportunity subsequent and that pretty much holds true for much of Latin America as well. Although I've never traveled to Russia I would, including some of the former Republics but not all. Some parts of Africa are do-able. Some not. You have to stay up to date on current events in the region and alot of extraneous factors are involved including your ability to function in fully autonomous mode which invariably happens. Even in the friendlier parts of the world a robust constitution is often required. Chose wisely.

    That said, I've enjoyed my travels immensely and have made many valued friendships, seen alot, learned alot and have had minimal difficulties considering. Understanding and being respectful of foreign culture and tradition is a big plus. So is a Canadian Passport if your an American.

  194. Safer then the US by bdempsey · · Score: 1

    Sure, why not. Iraq is probably safer then any large American city.

    I bet that at the end of this year (or end of last year) there were more murders in a few US cities than any deaths due to the war/terrorists.

    --
    Unemployed Tech Worker #494343
    1. Re:Safer then the US by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      murders of traveling contractors on the job? nah, most u.s. homicides have to do with suicide, domestic violence, & illegal deals gone bad

  195. They didn't say "military". by khasim · · Score: 1

    They said "anti-coalition".

    "If that US citizen was a member of the Coalition--that is, one of the 138,000 American or Coalition troops, or one of the few dozen remaining CGA personnel--then that citizen's death would be tallied as part of an "anti-Coalition attack." Otherwise, then it's just a homicide."

    Contractors are also filed under "coalition". Hell, that was even covered in the SECOND paragraph.

    "While daily reports of violence give the impression that chaos reigns, the U.S. Army's 1st Armour Division, which controls the Iraqi capital, says the number of "non-political" murder victims has declined dramatically over recent months."

    NON-POLITICAL

    NON-POLITICAL

    NON-POLITICAL

    So if someone killed him because he was an American, that would be...... POLITICAL.

    So his death would not be counted.

    So, once again what you are ACTUALLY saying is ... ... "If we don't count people like you being killed, then the statistics for people like you being killed are very low."

    1. Re:They didn't say "military". by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Contractors are also filed under "coalition".

      Depends on who they work for. If they work for the Coalition, then yeah, they're CGA personnel. Like I said. If they're hired by private firms, or if they're freelancers like the unfortunate Nick Berg, they're not CGA personnel.

      So if someone killed him because he was an American, that would be...... POLITICAL.

      Nope. You can't just make up your own definitions for words. Political murder is the killing of a politician. That is, an assassination. The killing of a CGA member, or a member of the IIG.

      So, once again what you are ACTUALLY saying is...

      You are so far away from understanding what I actually said, I don't think you can even see daylight any more.

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:They didn't say "military". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The report was for average Iraqi people, why count people who are targetted in the first place? Stop spreading your trollish crap. People aren't trying to hide anything. But then again you can't seem to accept this fact.

  196. Not all the world needs robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computers are not needed in all parts of the world. Technology creates weak mutants who cannot even move their legs or arms anymore. The people of afganistan are smarter than you are because they live in caves and non-toxic earth buildings instead of eyesores out of steel, arsenic/wood, and concrete. Do not help turn the world into a scrap heap or sell your soul to lucifer for $$$. Go smell some flowers and stop being a robot.

    All the world needs is organic food, but damn machines.

  197. No, don't go by anti-auctor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, I've been but in Saudi and you have seen what is happening there. I got the bucks fine and returned to tell the tale. But even if they don't behead you or otherwise kill you for real, you die a different death there anyway - the death that in the eyes of the native population they would see you really have if they could. You're a dog there. You're the 'other'.

  198. psychic stress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go here: http://www.whitewaterhealingcentre.com/healing.htm

  199. Has to beat working off of Woodward Ave in detroit by PsibrII · · Score: 1

    I've worked in a lot of places in even small town america that weren't safe. Never got paid a hazard premium for bimbos in SUVs weaving all over the road while putting on lipstick, or trying to dodge a squirrel.

    If you work in some area that's in the middle of a civil war, like northern ireland many years back, those who are likely targets usually get basic escape and evasion training for driving around.
    If offered this by all means TAKE IT, if nothing else you get to do crazy stunts in the company car and learn skills that can be translated to your urban driving needs.

    But for even a clerk working overnight in crappy neighborhood 7-11 up to someone working in some yugoslav free fire zone one basic rule applies. NEVER ESTABLISH A ROUTINE! A moving irregular taget it hard to hit. Be late, be early, use different routes around the work place, going to work. Its the ones who park themselves at the counter and zone out(in the 7-11 situation) that make prime targets to get robbed. Or the guy who picks up the other workers at checkpoint B at 9:14 every day on the dot for the last 3 months that get hit first.

    And best of all, in a zone where people are getting shot at, you don't have 4 hours meetings 3 days a week about why productivity is taking a dive since the meetings started 6 months ago. You gotta love a work environment where getting the job done, and not getting shot at are pretty much the ONLY goals.

    Theres also the perks of being paid insane sums, having quality foreign goods for dirt cheap prices, and spending money on only small high quality goods that can be shipped back easily. Rather than getting stupid and buring tons of money on cheap bulky K-mart grade throw away crap every week like when you are back home.

  200. Lagos? by paulbiz · · Score: 0

    Funny you bring up Lagos. I'm on my way there next week to collect my share of a $50 MILLION USD by pretending to be from the family of the ousted ruler. A very friendly and religious Nigerian gentleman hand picked me as the best candidate for the role. As soon as they receive my passport copy & banking information I sent, they'll give me the OK to proceed. I'm on my way to living the good life!

  201. Look at the facts. by khasim · · Score: 1

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/09/iraq/mai n577335.shtml

    October 9, 2003. The same month that the report you cite says only 24 people were killed in Baghdad.

    Yet 8 people died (not counting the 2 in the car) in that SINGLE attack. And those people were NOT Coalition or CGA. They were Iraqis.

    Which means that either the numbers you're citing are NOT calculated the way you claim they are ..or..
    Baghdad has almost ZERO violence with only 16 people being murdered there in October 2003.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3216539.s tm

    Seems that lots of Iraqis have died.

    Again, either the numbers are not calculated the way you claim ..or..
    well, there is no "or" now, is there?

    1. Re:Look at the facts. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Your post made no sense.

      Please bone up on your English and your basic math and try again.

      --

      I write in my journal
  202. This is no troll! by mabu · · Score: 1

    I know you're trolling, but try to separate the actions of the military, and the actions of civilian workers who went there afterwards to *help* build and rebuild.

    I'm not trolling. There are people here who are politicized heavily on both ends of the spectrum that apparently don't like looking at the situation over there from anyone else's point of view other than the extremely narrow, politically-correct vantage point.

    Until I read this thread, I would have thought that civilians working on reconstruction over there would be acceptable and lauded by both sides of the political spectrum, both pro and anti-war.

    It's a nice idea in theory and I appreciate that, but IMO, which seems to be backed up by an overwhelming majority of reports and actions (a great source of real perspective can be found watching MOSAIC, LinkTV's daily broadcasts of Middle Eastern news reports) indicate that not unlike how mainstream America seems to generalize that all Muslims are "evil-doers", the Muslims pretty much consider all Westerners the same. You can go over there with good intentions, but like most, these people base their impression on you off of actions, and most of the actions perpetrated in that region are not logical, nor moral.

    This to me is analagous to going into a neighborhood from far away, announcing that the neighborhood is infested with termites and, without any discussion, burning the neighborhood to the ground and destroying peoples' homes. Then you want to come in and rebuild the neighborhood? Do you honestly think the people who have had their houses destroyed by this aggressive invader really want those that did the initial destruction to come in and rebuild?

    That's really a ridiculous assumption.

    Do you want the Dentist who screwed up your teeth to fix it? Do you call the plumber back in that messed up your pipes? No, you don't trust someone who comes into your home with one plan, then changes the plan and terribly inconsistent and hypocritical in terms of their actions & objectives.

    The Americans came into Iraq with the idea of dethroning Saddam. Well he's long gone. They say they want to give Iraq back to the people, but they went into the country based on lies, and the things they promised have proven to not come to pass. Why should the Iraqis trust Americans? If the tables were turned, I doubt any Americans would want the invaders of their country sticking around to help rebuild it.

    So if you want to go over there to make some money, you're taking a real big risk walking into a region where you are not wanted and not liked. What you think is irrelevant. It's what they think. It's their community.

    The drug dealer analogy holds true in my opinion. I don't see much moral usefulness walking into that hornet's nest, at least not hand-in-hand with defense contractors and super large corporations who are profiting from all the death and destruction over there. If you want to help, I'd recommend donating resources and time to organizations that are outside of the military industrial complex, and those that are sanctioned by the Iraqis themselves.

  203. Who built their cities in the first place? by khasim · · Score: 1

    Why do WE need to "qualify" them or "oversee" them?

    They built the place before we bombed it.

    1. Re:Who built their cities in the first place? by martinde · · Score: 1

      That seems like a good point, but think about it for a second. There weren't millions of people there when the cities were built - building a city is a gradual process. For example, you could have one engineer build a road a year for 20 years, but we could have destroyed those roads in one day. But today they need the 20 roads due to the number of people there right now, so they can't wait 20 years.

      They (and we, and their neighbors) need the area to be stable as quickly as possible or the region will be even more chaotic than it is currently. (Watch what happens in Pakistan if the Kurds revolt if you want to see a real mess.) Bombing the heck out of them and walking away would definitely make for a less stable middle east than not bombing them would have, or rebuilding should. (There's still a fair chance that it will be less stable than it was, that's a good argument for not bombing them in the first place... But that is too late.)

  204. +1 Funny :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, *I* laughed.

  205. What's that? You say you can't read? by khasim · · Score: 1

    What's the problem?

    You had said:
    "Look, numbers don't lie. Plain facts don't lie. Last December, the story broke that the homicide rate in Baghdad had fallen to below the largest American cities. If you took the military casualties out of the equation, the Baghdad murder rate was lower than any American city."

    You cited a report that said that only TWENTY-FOUR people were killed in Baghdad in October 2003 (aside from the anti-coalition killings).

    I said that those anti-coalition killings are exactly what a contractor over there would need to worry about.

    You said that such was not the case. You said that those 24 killing INCLUDED all the killings not (and here I'll just quote you)...
    "Um... yeah. That's what I said. I said that if you take out the military casualties, the Baghdad homicide rate is lower than any US city."

    So I went back and pulled stories of Iraqis being killing, in October 2003, that were NOT in the military (or Coalition or CGA as you like to phrase it).

    Strangely, the numbers I pulled from those stories EXCEEDED the 24 deaths in the story you cited.

    So, is the story you cited incorrect?

    Or did you not understand how they arrived at only 24 deaths in October 2003?

    Awwwww..., did poor widdle baby fall for someone else's propoganda and fail to check the real facts himself?

    Awwwww.....

  206. It's not bad here in IRAQ, the money is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've started a website. geekiniraq

  207. Germans vs Americans by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Answer: The germans never named militairy hardware after races/tribes they wiped out.

    Actually, the Germans didn't wipe anyone out. They tried to, but they lost. Native Americans were a lot easier to fight than Russians armed with T-34s and supplied by American trucks. Americans got the Western USA for their efforst. Germans got Russian soldiers buggaring their wives and daughters in East Prussia.

    Boy, Hitler was stupid.

    --
    This is my sig.
  208. Germans vs Americans reduxx by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Actually, the conquest of the west was done in part by Germans coming from the old world to the new. So, the Germans good at conquering came over, and helped conquer the indians, but the rest stayed behind. Now if only we would have gotten the ones good at making cars.

    --
    This is my sig.
  209. You are not going to die.... by mcb2 · · Score: 1

    Listen guys...

    I've had 3 friends go to Iraq for contract work. They said that they felt more safe in the streets of baghdad than in detroit. The american contractors are guarded 24/7 by contract mercs, and foreign special forces troops. One guy I talked to said that usually it's the stupid people that get abducted by being in places that their not supposed to be. He said that if you just use common sense, and do what you are told, it is very safe for an american contractor in iraq.

  210. Why do you want our opinions? by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    Say that others have survived such contract jobs and made a fortune doing it. What difference does it make? You still have to make up your own mind about whether it's worth the risk to you, and just how much you need the hazard pay.

    It wouldn't be worth it to me, but I'm able to pay my rent right now. I'd guess it's more likely than not that you'd live through such a mission, but I'd rather take my risks on a motorcycle.

    --
    -Rich
  211. Re:I'm from the Private Sector, and I'm here to he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This American Life is a PRI program. Many public radio stations that carry NPR programming also carry PRI programming, but it's not the same thing.

  212. dude, seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shut the fuck up. really, how do you manage to find the time to write up this inane shit? you're a fuckin fag, and your site sucks cock.

  213. Don't listen to this guy - he's a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just some guy's karma whoring account. Mod him down when you can.