Slashdot Mirror


Lysergically Yours

scsiiscs writes "I have just had the pleasure of reading Lysergically Yours, the first offering from author Frank Duff. As the chemically aware among you may have guessed from the title, this is a novel which deals in part with the synthesis of and culture surrounding LSD. It is much more than just a drug book though, and what's better, it has been released under a Creative Commons license. " Read on for the rest of his review. Lysergically Yours author Frank Duff pages 120 publisher Insurgent Productions/No Media Kings rating Excellent (10) reviewer Ben Konrath ISBN 097348070X summary Clandestine chemists accidentally open the doorway into new modes of human consciousness.

April 16th, 1945: Dr. Albert Hoffman's work on obstetrics pharmacology at Sandoz Laboratories is unexpectedly interrupted by a "stream of fantastic pictures and extraordinary shapes with intense, kaleidoscopic play of colors."[1]

The following weeks saw Dr. Hoffman and his colleagues perform a series of self-experimentations which led to the discovery of the psychotropic effects of D-lysergic acid diethylamide 25, the most potent hallucinogen yet discovered -- and better known as LSD. The doors were suddenly flung open for a new age of exploration into the human mind. Government sanctions however quickly put an end to this line of research. Lysergically Yours, the first novel from Toronto-based author Duff supposes that this research program is still going strong, but not in the places one may traditionally think to look for it.

The reader is first introduced to Johnny, a computer science student at the University of Toronto and one-time high school acid dealer. It is through the lens of Johnny that the reader meets the book's delightfully diverse cast of supporting characters. From Lyle the punk-rock chemist to Tinka the manic witch and surprisingly affable career criminal Ivan, Duff continuously delivers with characters that you almost expect to run into the next time you're on campus despite the fact that they are so eccentric as to verge on unbelievable. As a former University of Toronto student myself, I must admit that the setting of the book was also wonderfully realized. From Convocation Hall to Lash Miller Chemical Laboratories to the basement of Hart House, Lysergically Yours romps across the university and the city bringing to life each locale that it touches.

The story itself is somewhat hard to classify. The opening throws Johnny and the reader into a very tense scene in which Johnny is the prisoner of Korean and Vietnamese mobsters and the building in which he is being held is being assaulted from outside by unknown forces. From this action-movie introduction, the story flashes back and begins to relate a decidedly non-action-movie drug culture caper story wherein Lyle and Johnny attempt to fund illegal research and a hedonistic lifestyle through the synthesis and sale of LSD. By the end however, as Johnny and Lyle find themselves deeper and deeper in trouble, the plot of Lysergically Yours verges strongly on the science fictional, yet Duff manages to wrap it all up into a bundle which leaves the reader feeling both entertained and satisfied.

At times the discussion of the technical details of drug synthesis and of various less than legal money-making schemes seem unnecessarily verbose, but perhaps they will be appreciated by those who are more familiar with the fields or even looking for a few pointers. In general however, Duff's prose is poetic in its spareness and simplicity. His dialogue also is unflowery and believable, conveying a real sense of character and situation. Even the far-sweeping conclusion of the novel, suggesting a world forever and fundamentally changed by the actions of a couple of punk rockers, is presented in a crisp and unapologetic style. As a reader, I could not help but be reminded of Neal Stephenson and, to a certain extent, Philip K. Dick.

My largest complaint with Lysergically Yours is that it is too short. Weighing in at 120 pages, the book is an easy read but leaves you feeling that it could have easily been expanded to fill twice as many. Still, in a time when most books seem to be guilty of the opposite sin, I am willing to forgive Frank Duff this indiscretion.

Another thing which makes this novel worth noticing is that it is released in affiliation with No Media Kings, an organization started by Toronto-based author Jim Munroe to promote a return to grass-roots media. In accordance with this "media of the people, by the people and for the people" ethos, Frank Duff has released the novel as a free e-text under the Creative Commons Attribution/Non-Commercial/Share-Alike license. This license not only allows the text of the novel to be freely distributed in any medium, but also explicitly allows for anyone to create derivative works from the novel for any non-commercial purpose. The use of this contract follows in the footsteps of successful science fiction author Cory Doctorow. The book is available as a physical artifact at a variety of small bookstores or directly from the author via his website where the e-book and several of his other shorter works are also available for free download.

[1] Hoffman, A. (1980) "LSD: My Problem Child," New York: McGraw-Hill.

Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

486 comments

  1. More information... by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Very interesting to see this on slashdot.

    Lysergically Yours is a good book, but is nothing compared to some of the other books available out there.


    I would suggest TIHKAL and PIHKAL by Alexander and Ann Shulgin

    That is, if you're interested in the chemistry... but for more casual psychonaughts, I would explore Erowid for information.

    The best part both TIHKAL and PIHKAL's more interesting and (knowledgable) parts are available for FREE online via those two links. Have fun, and remember, psychoactives can be a valuable learning experience but to anything good there's equal if not more bad. Read everything with logic and don't go and turn out like Huxley.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:More information... by daveashcroft · · Score: 0

      And lets look forward to QIHKAL, Shulgins up-and-coming new text on psychoactive cactus alkaloids. As far as the more interesting parts, i have to admit that i found the biographical sections of more interest. Most of the chemistry is straightforward, and only of any real use to a non-professional (ie those people who shouldnt even contemplate doing it...if not for legal reasons, then for personal safety reasons).

      Look out for QIHKAL, i believe it is due for publication sometime this year or early next year.

    2. Re:More information... by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm looking forward to it. I mostly enjoyed Shulgin's experience reports and the pertaining chemistry. Then again, I love bio-chemistry :)

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    3. Re:More information... by daveashcroft · · Score: 0

      Although....it probably wont end up being called QIHKAL (apparently Ann Shulgin is opposed to the name for some reason or another). That might actually be an exclusive! I dont think Sasha has made that public yet. Oops. Sorry

    4. Re:More information... by ePhil_One · · Score: 0, Troll
      ...self-experimentation... The doors were suddenly flung open for a new age of exploration into the human mind.

      I like this line, just because it so perfectly captures the stupidity of the drug culture. exactly what deep insights into the workings of the human mind are we supposed to get from researchers tripping on LSD? The color purple tastes salty? Dogs are really psychic, and want researchers to kill Santa Claus?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    5. Re:More information... by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

      Do you know Shulgin personally? I've read his works since I was a child.... (Well, I'm 18 now! hah.. probably like 14) Fascinating man.... must be cool to know him.

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    6. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? You must be doing much better drugs than those researchers.

    7. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: most of what you know about psychotropic drugs, you learned from DARE and other propaganda?

    8. Re:More information... by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wholeheartedly agree that these are great books, and I think that before anyone forms an opinion about people who use psychedelics based on those idiot kids that eat too much E and go to parties and get themselves in trouble, that they should read these books.

      The portions that are available for free, while wonderful for their own reasons, pale in comparison to the first half of the books. That is the story.

      These books are the "true story" (names changes etc in an attempt to avoid prosecution which worked well enough to keep the shulgins free, but not enough to save Sasha's Schedule 1 chemicals license as the opening of tihkal tells) of a chemist and psycopharmacologist.

      This man has invented drugs that later hit the street. He is so well respected in the community, that his job is a consultant. The DEA often brings him in to testify as an expert witness on chemistry and drugs. He is the real deal.

      More than that he is personally amazing. I saw him speak at MIT last year, and for an 80 year old man (or just about hes what 79 or so?) he is vibrant and totally with it. If I am half as with it as he is when I am 70, I will be thankful for how I ended up.

      Not exactly what many people would expect from a person who has had the experiences he has.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:More information... by funbobby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea behind "exploration" is that you can see a lot of interesting things about how something works when you push it outside of its normal running conditions.

    10. Re:More information... by Davethewaveslave · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Written by someone who clearly has never had the experience...

      Unless you have a degree in psychology, or more on-topic, are a psychiatrist, I wouldn't waste your effort dismissing what we are "supposed to get from researchers tripping on LSD".

      I'm neither a psychologist or a psychiatrist, but I can tell you from my experiences in the drug culture that there is certainly something about LSD that warrants more research into its effects on the mind. I've read that some researchers suggest it could benefit people who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, such as rape victims and war veterans. If improving the life of a trauma victim is not a worthy cause, I'm not sure what would be...

    11. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, someone who has never done LSD...... Interestingly, I've never had visual hallucinations on LSD, its always just been an alteration in thinking. One thing I've always thought would be nice to research is the 'time dialation' effect of various drugs. I've always been amazed at this very noticable effect.

    12. Re:More information... by daveashcroft · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, certain psychadelic drugs allow complete ego loss. Whereas recreational use may not be the best, if a person with deep-seated emotional problems can be taken by a trusted professional (ie psychiatrist) into a state of ego-loss and therefore allow themselves to see their "problem" from a different angle, as an outsider...then this can be very useful.

      Until the early 70's, LSD was used VERY succesfully in many cases in the treatment of alcoholism. "Clarity of mind" is an often overused statement, but for some people who's whole *normal* life revolved around wanting to satiate a craving for alcohol, limited and controlled LSD use could help them see what they were doing to themselves from another persons perspective.

      LSD was also succesfully used (as MDMA is now beginning to be tested) as a treatment for rape victims. Temporarily dissociating the victim from the experience and the emotion of what had happened to them allowed them to asses the situation and separate the act of violence from the emotional scar.

      Im not saying we should have a free-for-all, but i think its a damn shame that trained and trusted professionals are now banned in most of the world (by UN directive) from developing alreayd proven treatments for debilitating emotional disorders.

    13. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And once you're done with the reading and want some hands-on ;-)

      RacResearch

      American Chemical Supply

      There are tons of others too; your pleasure and check the sponsored links!

      LEGAL DRUGS! MOD UP!

    14. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're an ignorant cretin.

    15. Re:More information... by smclean · · Score: 1

      If you haven't had visual hallucinations on LSD, you just werent doing enough to cause them. I used to complain of the same thing, until that one special time(s).

      Wouldn't touch the shit now though.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    16. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Written by someone who clearly has never had the experience...

      Ah, I see, only drug users are qualified to comment. I'd argue that anyone who has had the experience isn't qualified to debate, any more than a crackhead is qualified to debate the legality of his addition of choice.

      I actually have studied some psychology, and while I haven't done any drugs myself, I've know several folks who have "experimented"; as an unaffected third party its pretty clear LSD has some pretty clear permanent mind altering effects, beyond the short term hallucagenic effects.

      Now, I'm not opposed to the position that LSD might be beneficial to some people; however its idiotic to think any serious research can be accomplished by self-medicating with powerful hallucinagens, and there's a real big ethical treatment issue in experimentation on others.

    17. Re:More information... by mtrx · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree that these are great books, and I think that before anyone forms an opinion about people who use psychedelics based on those idiot kids that eat too much E and go to parties and get themselves in trouble, that they should read these books. You are right. It's always good practice to get as much information as possible. But, if you want to know about E, you should go to http://www.ecstasy.org/. MDMA (or Ecstacy) is not a psychotropic substance. Apparently, techies are more prone to experimentation then I thought. Good for us.

    18. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let me guess: most of what you know about psychotropic drugs, you learned from DARE and other propaganda?

      No, most of what I know came from watching freinds destroy their minds and lives with drugs. The beauty of the drug is that it destroys your ability to recognize what it is doing to you, hence the stupidity of the researchers self-medicating. Its like a drunk that reaches into the deep fat fryer to get that floating french fry; except the drunk will eventually sober up and realize it was a really dumb thing to do.

      Alas, the effects are far too slow, and too many of these morons will reproduce before they remove themselves from the gene pool.

    19. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ahh, someone who has never done LSD...... Interestingly, I've never had visual hallucinations on LSD

      Is your point that because you have never had them that therefore they don't exist? Because really, you're kinda proving my point here.

    20. Re:More information... by m_evanchik · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I have also come across people whose drug indulgences (psychelic and/or otherwise) have plainly damaged their minds.

      As far as I know, there is no chemical compound that can reliably and safely improve one's mind.

    21. Re:More information... by johnnyb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm with you for the most part until you called doctors and psychologists "trusted" professionals. Clearly you do not know many of them...

    22. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't saying that people don't have them, I know lots of people (in fact most) who do. However I simply DON"T. And no, it isn't because I havn't done enough, unless you think you need to do more than 8 hits at a time to really trip... I was just stating as a point of fact that for some people like me, we don't freakin' see pink unicorns and shit (not to say I don't WANT to see stuff like that, I've always wished I could see the sort of stuff others see) There is alot more to tripping than just seeing weird stuff, it can be a verrrry mental experience.

    23. Re:More information... by vandan · · Score: 2, Funny

      The people you have come across most likely had damaged minds to start with, and their use of psychedelics simply accelerated their decline. They can do that. But they can also be the best chance of repairing mental damage, if used in a responsible way and under supervision of someone who knows what they're doing.

      There are certainly chemical compounds out there that can be used safely that improve your mind. People have been smoking weed for hundreds of thousands of years. There are theories that Human's ascent into a conscious realm of our own above the animal world was largely due to our use of Psyclobin mushrooms. The South American tribes swear by Ayahuasca. Go to any rave an ask people if the drugs they take are improving their lives and minds, and you will get some very interesting, articulate responses. Only those who have never tried psychedelics are so fast to write them off as being dangerous or damaging.

    24. Re:More information... by vandan · · Score: 1

      Too scared to try it, eh?
      Pitty, it would do you a world of good.

    25. Re:More information... by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... as an unaffected third party its pretty clear LSD has some pretty clear permanent mind altering effects, beyond the short term hallucagenic effects.

      Pretty clear, huh? Well, I can speak from first hand experience that no permanenet effects occurred, other than the registration of memories. Who you gonna believe? To paraphrase something I read somewhere, you cannot trust ANYONE'S assessment of drugs or the effects thereof:

      If the "authority" has done drugs, they are an unreliable source of information as their brains have been fried.

      If the "authority" has not done drugs, they are unreliable because they don't know first hand what they are talking about.

    26. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Too scared to try it, eh?

      Not at all. Are you scared to play Russian Roulette?

      Tell you what, you try putting a loaded automatic weapon to your head and pulling the trigger, and I'll try LSD. You go first.

    27. Re:More information... by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      exactly what deep insights into the workings of the human mind are we supposed to get from researchers tripping on LSD?

      How about this one: A particularly common motif experienced by "acid heads" is to hallucinate patterns reminiscent of ancient Mayan artwork. So, where is the insight? Apparently, some people -- who had never before been exposed to this imagery -- have seen these patterns after dosing on LSD! What does this say about the human mind? It says to me that there are latent images and symbols present in our neural matrix that are common to people from different regions and cultures. Now, where do these patterns come from?

      Here is another: Why do these compounds have reality distorting effects -- like video, audio, and tactile hallucinations? Because our brains rely upon native chemical analogs in order to form our perception of reality. To put it succinctly, everyone is tripping on drugs all the time. If you could extract all the psychoactives that your body naturally makes and put them in a bottle, you would be subject to arrest for possesion of an illegal substance.

      How's that for insight?

    28. Re:More information... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      True but its often lumped into the same catagory, whether appropriatly or not.

      Its often found in similar scenes, and even Shulgin himself had quite a hand in the rediscovery of MDMA. Both of which also share in common that they came first through experimentation in the psycothereputic community before they made it into more wide spread use.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    29. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read everything with logic and don't go and turn out like Huxley.

      You mean Leary right? Huxley was pretty level headed, and his book The Doors of Perception remains the best account of a psychedelic experience around.

    30. Re:More information... by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      How do you pronounce these titles? Tickle? Pickle?

    31. Re:More information... by Dever · · Score: 1
      hmm, yeah...that's a good point there. maybe we could have this research led by perfectly moral robots or something.

      anything but humans! they're the worst for anything ever!

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
    32. Re:More information... by vandan · · Score: 1

      Oh my, what an argument.
      Go on, stick your head back in the sand, AC.

    33. Re:More information... by fred911 · · Score: 1

      " its a damn shame that trained and trusted professionals are now banned in most of the world (by UN directive) from developing alreayd proven treatments for debilitating emotional disorders"

      Except for American Indians who now have federal protection against prosecution for posession and cultivation of their sacred Peyote. Amazing, considering providing wiskey to indians was once a crime:-)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    34. Re:More information... by elmegil · · Score: 1

      You don't. They're shorthand for Phenethylamines I Have Known And Loved and Tryptamines I Have Known And Loved, being much shorter to type than the amine names.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    35. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. I just pointed my WWII MP-40 (loaded with blanks) to my head and pulled the trigger. Very thrilling. Your turn :D

    36. Re:More information... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      They don't call fish "Brain Food" for nothing you know.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    37. Re:More information... by fred911 · · Score: 1

      "What does this say about the human mind? "

      To me it says the majority of people should be called "sheeple". Like this:

      #1 Introduce a sugestion of what "might" happen.
      #2 Introduce a chemical catalyst that triggers over production of serantonin while awake.

      #3 profit???

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    38. Re:More information... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I've watched a pretty hardcore (almost everyday for 5-6 years) cokehead basically get bored with powder after taking MDMA twice in a week, & no he didn't start taking X everyday or even every month, but it damn sure got him off of the coke.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    39. Re:More information... by Jaysyn · · Score: 0

      And I with no mod points....

      BTW, you ever pressed gently on your closed eylids while tripping (or even sober)? It causes an effect called phosphene stimulation that's pretty damn neat.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    40. Re:More information... by johnnyb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've just found that those in the "higher professions" (CS, medicine, psychology, law, etc.) seem to have

      * an elevated view of themselves and their opinion (not necessarily bad, if it weren't for the rest of the list)
      * the belief that their profession was more important than any other
      * the belief that their role should be authoritative instead of advisory (actually, psychologists don't do this, but the rest do)
      * the belief that those they serve have no ability to think for themselves
      * the belief that most traditions in life are bad because they weren't the ones who came up with them

    41. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Considering my family history, I'll be happy to breathing at 70, let alone with it.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    42. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well I for one WILL say they can be dangerous or damaging. Some simply are.
      And I HAVE tried pot and lsd. Not in great quantities, but more than once.
      It was quite a while ago. My take is that I did learn from them, and value the experience. But also I can see bad roads leading from those places and would caution AGAINST experimentation. If there were leagle and safe methods of use with trained professionals it would be different. But currently it can be a crap shoot.
      Pot is nearly harmless, and has some medical value. But to many make it such a big part of thier life it gets in the way, just like some people with drinking. I wouldn't hesistate to give it a leagle standing on par with drinking however.
      LSD is more serious. Yes you can gain some interesting points of view from it, and I really enjoyed the talk your ass off philosophical part of it. But it can exagerate any mental state so much, if you have a bad state going in it can hurt you. Also some try large doses to get the 'halucinations' that thier mental state ruins any chance of getting anything but 'wierd' (if lucky) out of it.
      I wouldn't go back in time and undo my experiences of years ago even if I could. I don't want to repeat them eigther.
      My advice would be not to try lsd, and pot only in a safe environment, and around friends you trust, preferably in a country where it's leagal, because here in the US it is not. And don't lose perspective if you really must try pot, you don't want to make it a significant part of your life. If you must try it, do a small amount once or twice then move on.
      I guarantee it lowers your IQ while stoned. I've known, and still know, lots of people who've used it and once past just a little they lose smarts till they sober up, and most of the time swear the opposite, kinda like the drunk who thinks he can drive just fine.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    43. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      One Word: Flashbacks.
      In my case they were rare and minor (mostly just tracers and an odd mindset) and vanished after a couple years, but I only did a small amount 3 times. I've known a couple of people who've had full blown trips years afterwords.
      And one guy who never did fully re-connect. I only met him a few times, but the second time he'd been trying to figure out which side of the mirror he was on. Admittedly he also did other heavy drugs(cocain mostly, meth once in a while), and did shock therapy during recovery after he finally realized he needed it.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    44. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Can you point to the law that says this. Last I checked it was an urban myth, but if somthing has change I'd like to hear it (could be, I haven't checked in many years).

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    45. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I know your not serious, but that really is a bad idea, blanks can and have killed.
      There was a tv show about some spy's pretending to be models or some such back in the 80's, the main actor killed himself that way screwing around.
      Same actor that had just done a time travel series with some kid, where they went around fixing historical 'glitches', like the one where Francis Scott Key accidently droped his only copy of a certain famous poem on a street.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    46. Re:More information... by norsk_hedensk · · Score: 1

      BS. flashbacks are rare. do the research. the guy never "reconnected?" NO WONDER! you said you r self that he was on other heavy drugs.

    47. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then I must exist some sort of statistical fluke, nearly everyone I've ever met who's tried it more than once has had at least a few flashbacks. I count at least a dozen. One guy was having them years(5+) later with leaves turning colors, in summer.
      Yeah the guy who had issues as much as said he did A LOT of acid (8-10 hits every weekend day, for over three years) and that the cocain and occasional meth and electroshock where bad for him. He never quite re-connected, but he wasn't totaly gone eigther, most of the time he could do alright, just seemed a little odd. So I don't count his experiences towards much other than DONT DO WHAT HE DID!
      Intense flashbacks are rare, and usually indicate a pattern of heavy usage over an extended period of time. Flashbacks, based on the dozen or two people I've talked to, occure in frequency and intesity in proportion to usage. It also varies with individual difference. I only did about 7 hits over 3 occasions and had very minor (mild tracers, slight shift of mental perspective) a dozen times or so over the next 18-24 months. Another friend of mine two hits once, he had two incedences of minor tracers during the next 3 months, nothing since. Another, the exception in my experience, did 5 hits on two occasions and only reported feeling alittle odd once a week after the second occasion, but not odd like lsd.
      One guy I knew who used to sell LSD and had a lifetime total in the mid 30's had minor flashbacks on a weekly basis, and during the year I knew him had one full blown trip, he commented that since he'd stoped doing LSD the strength and frequency had droped off considerably. I saw him after his wedding 3 years later and asked how he was, and amoung other things mentions his flashbacks had become rare and were never more than tracers anymore. One close friend with a slightly higher life-total had somwhat weaker flashbacks that faded faster after he quit.
      Now you can say thier rare, and perhaps they are and my experiences and those of about 15 people I've met are unusual, but I think the fact that it's been illeagal for close to 30 years thus reducing the possibility for scientific studies, I doubt it.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    48. Re:More information... by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      I was trying to be cute ... although I have pronounced the book "pickle" rather than spell it out.

    49. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget the dangers of dancing. This is another bizarre and disgusting pracitce that should be outlawed to protect the children. It is a well known fact that once children are exposed to dancing it's just a matter of time before they fall into the satanic influence of deviant sexual behavior. Clearly drugs and dancing are one and the same evil that the good clean Americans amongst us have been fighting since we first settled our colonies on this god forsaken wilderness.

    50. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at your ridiculous trolling posts over the past day, we can only be so lucky. Have fun sucking on GWB's dick and being a complete retard. Honestly, you win ignoramus of the day award (which you should be thrilled about, considering all the other entirely ignorant posts today [ie the guy who thiinks that people play their loud music in their cars to bug other people, rather then to enjoy the music themselves]). Sorry, he would have gotten the award, but your idiotic posts in this topic put you over the top!!!! Congrats on your ignorance!!!! Vote Bush you fucking idiot!!!!!

    51. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow-- you completely missed the most obvious problem...

      many doctors are just ordinary fucking people who think with their dicks.

    52. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call seeing a tracer and a slight shift of mental perspective a flashback? Um, okay. Even if it is, what exactly is the harm again? I missed that part.

    53. Re:More information... by fred911 · · Score: 1

      http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal22x/aipaamen.htm

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    54. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. The funny thing is, in college, a friend of mine was just starting to do acid, so I was trying to talk him out of it.

      I talked to my psych prof, I did a *lot* of research, and the best scare tactic I could bcome up with to talk him out of it is that acid will cause you to go crazy just slightly less than the odds of you going crazy if you didn't take it.

      I started taking acid needless to say.

      And you know what-- I haven't done it in at least ten years (so I did it for 4-5 years). But-- I did play the best pool of my life while on acid. Trying to avoid all those little volcanoes of guacamole really makes you *think* about your shots.

    55. Re:More information... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Flashbacks are a myth. Between a large control group that had never taken LSD and a group that had, both had equal occurences of "flashback" symptoms. Some good research has been done on the subject already.

      I encourage everyone to try LSD at least once. Just do it in a safe place with people you honestly like and trust. Things can feel like they're going wrong but others can help you through the troughs. I've been that someone more than once, and it's always easier to help a person out of a bad trip if they know and trust you. After all, a bad trip is little more than a state of mind.

    56. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I never said it was harm, I said it happened. Some try to say otherwise, or that it's rare, but personal experience proves to me otherwise.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    57. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but that is simply not true. I've had flashbacks of low severity, I know the difference from normal mindset and lsd mindset. I know what tracers are, and how they can occur. And I know several individuals who have flashbacks significant enough to show that they're not just subtle shifts in mindset. Seeing leaves change colors and melt and other such hallucinations does not happen to ordinary people in the same frequency as people who've done LSD. Nor are many of the other symptoms I've had described. So unless you want to try and tell me people who have no reason to bs me, are not prone to tall tales, and in many cases don't know one another, are all lying to me, they do happen more than rarely. Saying they don't happen is simply false, I know better from having had them.
      How about you link to some of this 'research'. Since it's illeagle in the usa I would be very suprised to see research here by mainstream science.
      And saying a bad trip is no big deal is BS, having seen one friend go through a relatively minor one, and knowing a guy who went through worse. Please stop feeding this crap to people, your going to get traumatized for life with your carelessness. It's one thing to realize such things should be personal choice, but to encourage others to take such risks and feed them bs about such risks is moraly reprehensible.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    58. Re:More information... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want a tad bit more explanation of 'why' to your questions, here you go.

      Serotonin is responsible for regulating emotion and other reactions in the brain. It's a nice little enzyme that plugs into neuroreceptors and prevents absorption of other chemicals. LSD and it's friends fit into the same plug as serotonin does and therefore causes elevated serotonin levels. By proxy, other chemical levels rise and the result is chemical chaos.

      The perceptual confusion that results, like typical reports of seeing sound and hearing light, is due to parts of the brain that handle channeling information from point A to point B getting crossed up. Nearly the whole brain is affected, which in turn affects the CNS (central nervous system). People have often reported being 'faster' or 'stronger' under the influence of LSD, and it's a direct result of the CNS stimulation. Sweating and delayed fatigue is common as well.

      I know way too much about this subject so I'll bore you with any more details. Suffice it to say, the patterns people see are the direct result of chemical processes that are out of whack. Not enough sleep will cause you to hallucinate after a few days...serotonin is to blame for that as well. Without a regulator chemical, other chemicals cause trouble.

      (as a sidenote, for those of you who want to experience LSD visual patterns without the drugs, go build a Dream Machine. Good times with your brain's alpha waves).

    59. Re:More information... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Like I said, bad trips are little more than a bad state of mind. It's all in the tripper's head. It will blow over as the brain's chemicals begin to stabilize, maybe in minutes, maybe in hours, but inevitably it settles down. I never said it wasn't a big deal. People in bad states of mind shoot each other or jump from bridges, but ultimately, it's in their heads as well. That's why I suggested that people be responsible and experiment in a controlled environment.

      Speaking of traumatized for life, I have never read a single case of someone who had permanent mental damage as a result of LSD usage. It doesn't directly affect the brain like other drugs; it inhibits serotonin re-uptake. Your brain makes serotonin constantly so your trip will always end and eventually you'll be back to normal.

      Sounds to me like you rely on quite a bit of anecdotal evidence from friends and 'a guy that knows a guy'. I speak from personal experience and from reading many books on the subject. At one point in my life I found it fascinating enough to spend hours in the college library learning more about it.

      Since you probably won't be happy with trusting that I know something, here are some links for you.

      http://groups.google.com/groups?q=flashback+myth &h l=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=330B659C.59E4%40gte.com&rnu m=1
      http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd_info3 .shtm l

      Information like this is hard to come by on the internet but there are literally dozens of books from the 50's onward that discuss LSD and how it works.

    60. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I'm NOT a guy who knows a guy I'm me, some of those anectedotes are PERSONAL first hand experience. A good many more are from friends of 10+years.
      And linking to a single newsgroup post that's no better than the discussion here does little to support your statement that flashbacks don't happen.
      The second link looks a bit better, and deffinately *supports* the existance of flashbacks, and agrees in general with my experience other than it seems to indicate that flashbacks are less likely to stop occuring after a time than my experience would indicate. Though to be honest I have not delt with the 'erowid' site or Dr Henry David Abraham. However It does have the apearance of validity and if it's faked it's done well enough to fool a non-expert or even an educated layman.
      Mental trauma comes from experience, a bad trip can be a very bad experience. Shure it's all in the head, so are MOST mental traumas. Psycological trauma isn't like brain cancer, you don't have to damage the brain to cause it. Now most trauma will heal in time, but I could easily see a very bad trip affecting someone for a few years, and someone contemplating trying LSD should consider this, but not right befor taking it. How you go into the trip is gonna have significant impact on it. If someone is going to try it, they should try a very small dose the first time and bring a positive mindset.
      LSD is a bit more than just a SRI, prozac zoloft and others are sri's and have very different effects for the most part.
      Also google has 'about 2,120,000' results on a search for LSD, this drops to 'about 115,000' if the search terms are study,research, and lsd.
      Mostly I just don't want people taking it lightly, or believing flashbacks don't happen.
      The truth is LSD can have significant effects and is NOT for everyone. No one should take it believing it's no big deal and nothing bad can happen or with false information about what can and can't happen. The main reasons I would recomend against it are all side effects of it being illeagle. No controll over purity or dosage, if a professional of some sort is needed for someone those who are still o.k. hesitate for fear of jail, and you can't make an apoint to have a professional there ahead of time.
      If it was leagal I'd be tempted to try it again, but as it is no way.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    61. Re:More information... by lanswitch · · Score: 1

      One of the biggest misconceptions about LSD is the "hallucination" bit. They are more like illusions. Illusions can be controlled, hallucinations can not. When you concentrate on this idea during your trip, you might get the control you need to get the visual things going.

    62. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they called tuna brain food, and that was only becuase it contains so much dolphin.

    63. Re:More information... by norsk_hedensk · · Score: 1

      tracers are not flashbacks. MANY people have lsd like tracers (albeit not as intense) regularly. usually this is early in the morning after waking up, or right before going to bed. peeople who have never used lsd have tracers as well. anyway, having visual tracers is not having a flashback.

    64. Re:More information... by 5meodmt · · Score: 1

      I don't know how IQ and the understanding of music compare, so I'm not going to dispute the IQ thing (esp. with non-regular smokers) while stoned. But I do, and know many others who do notice a much greater understanding and appreciation of music while high. I think this is why so many stoners love the Grateful Dead- it is extremely complex music that can be difficult to understand to it's fullest extent while sober. Personally, I find that while I'm high I can pick out the various instrument's parts and listen to them in full appreciation (as if it were that instrument alone being listened to while high). I think of it as IQ is an understanding of the box we call everyday life, and pot, while it may lower our finely tuned focus of the inside of the box, can help us examine the box from the outside. Many things we see are backward from the viewpoint of the sober world, but a new perspective of our everyday world can be very helpful, and fun.

    65. Re:More information... by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      I agree with just about everything you said. Marijuana is certainly not good for you, but, it is no worse than cigarettes or the air in LA. LSD is a very serious psychoactive compound (a serotonergic hallucinogen, actually) which can blow huge holes between your conscious and subconscious minds. This can be a very good thing, or a very bad thing depending on your personality, upbringing, mental/emotional condition and most importantly--being geneticly or behavior prone to such negetive conditions.

      For me, it was a reality shattering experience. I saw things that weren't there, though of ideas that had no basis in reality, experienced 'dimension' I can't even explain, etc. I know damn well I wasn't having some supernatural experiences so much as being 'messed up on a drug.' However, I did walk away from the experience(s) with exactly what I had hoped for (and exactly what most people--especially most americans--desperately need): Some serious difference in perspective. To see things from outside of yourself, or at least in a severely different way. This has been priceless to me in my artistic endeavors, my business dealings, and my interpersonal relations. Hell, it even eliminated a semi-serious (but dealt with) anxiety problem. ("After the shit I saw, felt, and was thinking about for the past 8 hours, nothing the real world has got to offer can really freak me out anymore") That, and ever since even my first (albiet mild) experience with LSD, every day I wake up to a beautiful day I'd rather sit on the porch and enjoy my morning coffee and cigarette and just smile to myself, enjoying the world and it's inherent absurdities, quirks, and ideosynchrosies...as opposed to watching the news to get up to speed with the day. (Or "locked into the collective-conscious-machine" as I see it...but, that's for another rant entirely)

      However, my best friend--who is very predisposed to such conditions as depression, paranoia, bipolar/manic episodes, etc....he had taken lots of acid over a period of 3 or 4 months. He was fine. Untill one day at a concert when he had a 'bad trip'. Everyone figured it would wear off as he came down. Once he slept he'd be just fine, right? Well, that is certainly true...but for 4 days he wasn't able to sleep. He was very delusional, having conversations with his visions, and could barely be expected to hold a thought (let alone conversation) for more than a few moments. He had to be taken to the hospital, given a shot of norepinephrin, and put to sleep. He woke up feeling and acting just fine.

      My friend thorougly enjoyed the hallucinogenic experience, so he figured he'd be more 'strong minded' this time, and try again. Well, to make a long story short, it happened again.

      On the same token, I've also seen some people take LSD the way fratboys drink shitty beer. Just to get messed up. No insights or perspective were gained. They walk away from the experience like they would an empty keg. A little messed up with a need to sleep it off.

      However, the one thing that I must staunchly disagree with you on is your 'guarantee' that marijuana lowers IQ. That's a very silly asessment in the first place. So lets just call it 'cognitive impairment'.

      While I'm not proud, I'm very honest about my use of Marijuana. I've been 'stoned' through just about every experience a person might encounter and/or deal with on a daily basis. Not to mention the "shitload of times" that I've had to deal with 'extreme situations' while also being intoxicated on Marijuana smoke.

      Of course, you could obviously (and rightly) claim this is just the same as the drunk who says "I can drive just fine." But I can absolutely assure you that myself, and many other chronic users conduct ourselves in just as calm, collected, respectful, informed and responsible manner while stoned.

      Though, I can understand how easy it is to get overwhelmed by your senses and perceptions while stoned...but, have a strong mind and it shouldn't be an issue

    66. Re:More information... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      And have we forgotten how the Dragon and his son died?

      Bruce died of a brain edema possibly secondary to drug use; meanwhile, Brandon died on set of an accident involving blanks.

      Lesson: neither guns nor drugs are toys for our amusement.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    67. Re:More information... by spiralx · · Score: 1
      I've been taking acid for almost 10 years now (along with various other hallucinogens like 2-CB, 2-CI, DMT, TMA-2 and so on when I have them) and I don't get any visuals effects at all... despite having taken hundreds in that time, including at least one 1200+ug dose and several 400+ug trips.

      I've had mild tracers for a couple of months in the past after doing it most weekends for a while, they faded though and now I don't get anything at all even though I do it a couple of times a month on average.

      Tracers are not uncommon, but full on HPPD is very unusual and most likely a symptom of an already existing underlying problem rather than just being the acid.

    68. Re:More information... by c0bw3b · · Score: 1

      I guarantee it lowers your IQ while stoned. I've known, and still know, lots of people who've used it and once past just a little they lose smarts till they sober up, and most of the time swear the opposite

      Meh, I call BS. Anecdotal evidence is crap. I know a girl that is probably the smartest person I know, yet she also smokes more pot than anyone else I know. Graduated from a prestigious university with a high grade point, is now highly successful and still smokes just as much pot.

      --
      ||:|::
    69. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I encourage everyone to try LSD at least once.

      I think LSD is great and that its use could benefit many people. But I wouldn't go so far as make your statement above. Psychoactives can reveal latent psychosis in certain people. Believe me, I've seen it. There's nothing like dropping with someone only to have them manifest homicidal tendencies (brandishing a hunting knife while looking you up and down as if they are trying to determine where to start cutting & pacing around the room cursing like a maniac) to send you on a bad trip. I had to be very careful in that situation. Scary.

    70. Re:More information... by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      Here are some quick links for related materials:

      TiHKAL
      PiHKAL
      The Vaults of Erowid

    71. Re:More information... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1


      I can't believe Slashdot has sunk to basically promoting illegal drug use. I thought this place was somewhere smart people gathered to get the latest news and gossip. You want to fry your mind - go ahead. This is not the forum to be pushing drugs on. There's enough pressure for people to take drugs without it appearing here. If Slashdot's coverage is going to include fucking drug pushers, shout it out on the front page so I can be forewarned that this is somewhere I don't want to be.

    72. Re:More information... by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1

      I would mod you funny... but there are other places in here I'd like to post... so I'm just gonna post and say so.

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
    73. Re:More information... by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1

      I think they can both be toys for ameusement. But they certainly need to be handled with care by people who no what they're doing. They're not something you joke around with, and they're not something you're casual about. But if you're safe and informed then both can be fun. (preferably not at the same time though.... that would certainly violate the 'safe' stipulation... lol)

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
    74. Re:More information... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd probably find it funny, too, if I didn't lose my best friend to drugs.

    75. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      There is a qualitative and rather obvious difference between non-lsd tracers and those when under the effect. I can tell you for the first 18+ months approx after I last tried LSD, I had occasion to see the SAME kind as LSD induces.
      I've seen both the minor visual anomaly you speak of, and the full blown lsd style tracers, the difference is so big it's not even worth suggesting confusing the two.
      We're talking the difference between stepping of a curb and barly noticing it and repelling 40+ feet face first (which is a blast!).

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    76. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Well as far as 'lowered IQ' it was meant as an euphemism for somthing I found to be nearly universal. EVERYONE I've ever been around personaly was at best almost as good stoned and sober at anything requiring thought or significant action.
      Some have mentioned some introspective tasks are improved, or at least a fresh perspective gained. That makes some sense and I can understand where for some that might be true. Being a subjective thing however we each only take the others word for it. In my case as I went along my tolerance built up backwards untill I turned into a drooler after just a couple a puffs, couldn't even think coherently. Let alone talk.
      It would seem (and this is a spot hypothises not really thought through yet) that perhaps it's the object mind that is suppressed as it were. This would leave the subjective mind to do it's own thing. If so it might make hypnotizing the stoned easier, giving it some theraputic value in that regard. Still I am just spouting off the top of my head based on comments and observations here.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    77. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Yes anectedotal evidence is only really good at giving you ideas for proper studies.
      I will however submit I've yet to see a single exception to better cognitively sober vs stoned. Myself being a rather extreem example sadly. I go from Mesna member to not even able to speak 3 words in a row without losing the thought. I mostly just sit there staring blankly.
      You quote one example of someone who is a) very smart, and B) a significant user. That isn't any contradiction to my statement however which is purely relative to the TWO states in a single individual. I submit it's likely she goes from outstandinly smart stoned to even smarter sober. I know a couple of people like that myself.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    78. Re:More information... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      There are a few wierd things about Brandon Lee's death.
      Fair warning this is a bit tin-foil hat-ish/grassy knoll type stuff.
      Where my mom worked one of the regular patrons was a retired property manager who used to work in the movies, he'd retired about five years previously and moved back near family.
      He said the whole thing sounded really bad as when he was a property manager NO guns capable of firing LIVE rounds were alowed anywhere near the set. And live rounds also were verboten. This was before they changed the story. Originaly the story was someone had loaded a live round into a gun by mistake.
      Now that's a hard mistake to make even if you have live rounds and a gun that can fire them on set, against all the rules, at the same time. Blanks are visibly different and shorter because they lack the bullet itself and have a wad of cloth or simular material held into the caseing by it being crimped. Also every gun used in a shooting scene carefully checked over by several people all to make shure it's safe to use.
      Of course they changed that few months later to say what killed Brandon was a piece of shrapnel where the gun malfunctioned.
      This is all just a few weeks after Brandon said he was begining to have doubts about the official story behind his fathers death. Somthing he'd always accepted despite the rumors Bruce was killed for sharing secrets with westerners.
      Now likely it's just as advertised, but still the oddities make for interesting speculation.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    79. Re:More information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, SOP even when dealing with blanks is to aim away from the targeted actor but use camera angle tricks to make it look like you're aiming at him.

    80. Re:More information... by aerique · · Score: 1

      Go Troll! Go Troll! Gooooooo!.. Trolly!

    81. Re:More information... by Transient0 · · Score: 1

      i usually refer to them as PEA-CAL and TEA-CAL when speaking the titles aloud.

    82. Re:More information... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      So because you learned to experience something new and don't need a catalyst for this is a bad thing? Reality is a state of mind, what the other poster stated is correct. However if you believe a bad trip is the end of the world, then it certainly will be.

    83. Re:More information... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      actually, it has more to do with the visual pathway. There's a time dilation effect and the process your brain goes through to assemble the world outside slows down. Hence the reason that if you stare at a complex pattern certain visual elements will stand out in a sequence,i.e., first horizontal bars, then diagonals, swirls, etc... not that specific order though. Anyways, like most vision, your brain takes the info it has, and applies all it's top-down processing algorhythms to determine what it is you're looking at. For any interested parties out there, stare at complex geometric patterns to achieve a hallucination instead of blank walls. LSD would be very helpful in vision research as well as other sensory research as it's easy to break down the system into it's many components.

    84. Re:More information... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      It increases one's ability to do yoga. Mind and body have a tighter connection on pot.

    85. Re:More information... by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1

      That is truly sad. But the logic is somewhat lacking. I would say that because of drunk driving the casualities due to alcohaul probably exceed that of drugs, but alcohaul is still legal. Besides that, the article was about a book, the fact that it glorifies drugs is no better or worse then glorifying any other decision people make in their lives. People are free to make their own choices.

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
  2. 2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All your hits are belong to us.

  3. Ah, LSD by Neil+Blender · · Score: 3, Funny

    So many memories.....erased.

    1. Re:Ah, LSD by zootread · · Score: 1

      So many memories.....erased.

      More like:

      "So many memories... *flashback* aghhhhhh I'm freaking out!!!!"

      I had some of the best times and worst times on LSD.

      --
      Zoot!
    2. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though I know you are trying to be funny... I have some of the most vivid memories of what I was doing while I was spun on acid.

      I don't know if that is a good or a bad thing but I certainly know that no matter what it was that I was saw, thought about, or did, LSD opened doors in my life that I would never have explored otherwise.

    3. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to worry, you will find new friends and faces, coming out of the walls for years to come.

    4. Re:Ah, LSD by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have some of the most vivid memories of what I was doing while I was spun on acid.

      I don't know if that is a good or a bad thing but I certainly know that no matter what it was that I was saw, thought about, or did, LSD opened doors in my life that I would never have explored otherwise.


      Absolutely. Everyone should take LSD at least once in their life. It really opens your eyes to things and I still have many insights into life that I think I might never had without it. I took it about 10-15 times (last time was more than 10 years ago.) I have never had a flashback, and only one 'bad trip' (which was terrible, but is really a product of the environment you expose yourself too while on it.) LSD has really been demonized but I think it is pretty harmless. If you really can't bring yourself to take LSD, try shrooms. You get the same affect but for a much shorter time.

    5. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never quite recovered from my breakfast cereal's pitiful squeaks of pain as I chewed it.

    6. Re:Ah, LSD by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Informative

      P.S. Since I advocated the use LSD or shrooms, please note: Never, ever, ever, ever take it alone and if you have never taken it, take it with some one who has. If you don't follow those rules, you will have a bad time. Guaranteed.

    7. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      (Having to post anonymously because of the fear of company anti-drug policy sucks)

      LSD certainly helped me out immensely. I used to be very shy and pretty antisocial. This is hard to explain but when I first did acid, I was able to have two very distinct tracks of thought one which was me interacting with people, and the other which was me observing myself interacting with people. I saw that what I had always thought of as people being antisocial toward me, was an illusion. These people behaved the same way toward me as they did everyone else... it was me who was being antisocial.

      After that trip I was able to change the way I reacted to people, and finally have normal relationships with the people around me.

      I've done LSD a few times since then, and have never had a bad trip, or any sort of flashbacks.

    8. Re:Ah, LSD by TwinGears · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's been years but I would have to agree with you. Nothing better than a good head trip to clean the cobwebs in the brain.
      Flashback is a foolish term for that which will never happen. There are those that haven't a clue how memory functions...some of them work for M$. Thus the problem continues...

      --
      The immature mind measures.
    9. Re:Ah, LSD by ktulu1115 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Very good advice but I'll take it a step further - Read the FAQ before you do. It will make the experience infinitely better, and if you follow it very closely your chances of having a bad trip will be next to none.

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    10. Re:Ah, LSD by misleb · · Score: 1
      So many memories.....erased.

      What do you mean? I take it you've never use the stuff. Some of my most vivid and amazing memories have come via LSD.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    11. Re:Ah, LSD by maximilln · · Score: 0, Troll

      P.S. Since I advocated the use LSD or shrooms, please note: Never, ever, ever, ever take it alone and if you have never taken it, take it with some one who has. If you don't follow those rules, you will have a bad time. Guaranteed.

      Oh give me a break. You wannabes with your hand-holding advocacy should give it up already. You just want to have a better chance of someone involving you with their experience.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    12. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean? I take it you've never use the stuff.

      Please see this post.

    13. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not use over the counter drugs? At least you know what's in them.

    14. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've taken shrooms and acid alone. good times, and you dont get held down by the people around you.

    15. Re:Ah, LSD by daveashcroft · · Score: 0

      because all drugs that act in the same way have been banned by various governments. My argument is that clinical trials SHOULD be carried out using these drugs....so that they CAN be made available, and absolutley available by specialist prescription.

    16. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I understand, a psychonaut actually wants to have a person with them who is _NOT_ doing drugs at the time. That person can basically prevent a freakout by reminding the person that what is happening is not the result of reality breaking apart, but just the drug that they have taken. That and if things get too bad, an ambulance can be called.

    17. Re:Ah, LSD by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Unless of course youre me and you just gotta GOTTA go check the moon shining off the marble at the graveyard. just fly and i and a liquid sky.a drop of acid and those who die.dancing with the bending stone,flyneye all alone.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    18. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As we all post AC as the paranoia sets in...

      I'm kidding, but I only took LSD once, and that WAS the bad trip. I was actually in my own house, with a bunch of friends, but it was a damn harrowing ride. That was about 8 years ago, and I haven't touched a hallucinogen since. I like drugs' ability to alter your mindset from your conventional way of thinking, but that was enough for me to swear it off forever.

      Granted, I later took random X tabs that had a bit of LSD in them and had both the best/worst high I'd ever had. Sometimes it's all about the user's mindset. Drugs can bring out some really strange character traits in people--either for good or for bad.

    19. Re:Ah, LSD by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Absolutely. Everyone should take LSD at least once in their life. It really opens your eyes to things and I still have many insights into life that I think I might never had without it.
      I'd have to disagree. But maybe not for the reasons you'd think.

      When I was in high school, LSD was the drug of choice. I'm not kidding -- more people were around, dropping acid, than doing cocaine or pills or speed or anything else. Certainly all that stuff was there, too, but you could barely go to class on your average Thursday and be assured that nobody in that class was tripping on LSD. And I mean everybody did it. The jocks did it. And you know what? As far as I can tell, it "opened their eyes" to pretty much exactly ... nothing. Those clowns acted like jocks act pretty much the world over. If you met them at a party and they were tripping pretty hard, they would babble at you with some sheepish grin on their faces, but the rest of the time they were getting into fights, date-raping girls, tricking out cars, getting drunk, and refusing to pay for abortions just like the rest of 'em. If anything, their experiences with LSD only opened them up to start taking E when that came on the market, and subsequently some of those guys fried their brains out pretty good getting into that whole culture. (On the plus side, it seemed to make them a lot less aggressive/violent.)

      So yeah, maybe if you're curious about certain kinds of brain experiments you can conduct on yourself, and you're a contemplative enough person to get something out of it, then maybe you should add LSD to your checklist of "things to do before I croak." But otherwise, you're just taking drugs. I can't really tell who'se worse, though ... the people who just take LSD to get high, or those hippies who still walk around yammering about how great it is to take drugs, not realizing that while they were stoned and not paying attention, pretty much the whole world started taking drugs, and nonetheless, the utopian society of like-thinking individuals enlightened by LSD never happened. Pity.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    20. Re:Ah, LSD by redivider · · Score: 1

      As someone who has had several "flashbacks" I would strongly disagree with that part of your statement. Just because you've never had one doesn't mean it can never happen. This is one of the dangers of prohibiting any kind of research on these drugs -- there are some many conflicting reports of what they can and can't do, it's hard to know who to believe. Having said that, I've never had full-blown, peak-of-the-acid-experience type flashbacks, and I'll admit I'm still not sure if that's possible, but I have experienced being on acid without actually taking any. Every time it has happened it was triggered by some kind of stress or anxiety, so it may be a combination of "flashback" and anxiety attack, but this is a much different anxiety attack than one that you would have if you had never taken LSD. Anyway, just wanted to throw that out there for what it's worth. Obviously, this doesn't *prove* that flashbacks are possible, but in my experience they are.

      --
      Sinch
    21. Re:Ah, LSD by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      I did it once... and it was a bad trip.... NEVER again

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    22. Re:Ah, LSD by maximilln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People have a greater tendency to freak out when trying anything new, be it a psychological experience, sky diving, scuba diving, driving, motorcycling, snowboarding, bicycling, or anything which requires intense concentration.

      There is no substitute for calm and experience.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    23. Re:Ah, LSD by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're really pressed for time, say just a half hour between pottery painting class and picking up the kids, then try a little Dimethyltriptamine (DMT).
      It packs all the punch of acid trip into 15 minutes. And leaves you all warm and fuzzy afterwards.
      See Ken Russell's 1981 film with William Hurt called 'Altered States' where he injects DMT into a withdrawn patient just see what will happen. When he asks her what she feels, she replies, "I feel like God is touching my heart."

    24. Re:Ah, LSD by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pay no attention to the buzzkill spell the parent is throwing at you. Take LSD or mushrooms alone or with company as you judge best, depending on your mental stability, or ability to possibly confront dramatically your inner contradictions. The presence of another person can help avoid any compounding feelings of lonliness/abandonment/alienation if the unfamiliar experience feels threatening, while you're in a sensitive mental state that can become quite exaggerated. Depending on the sympathetic capacity of the other person. In fact, any drug that doesn't leave you passed out with a plastic bag over your head (like some kinds of N20 abuse) is just as risky alone as with a "spotter" or guide. But be aware that LSD, due to the "set and setting" effect, allows you to experience the kind of trip that you expect, especially if your preconceptions are subliminal, like those which can be planted by self-fulfilling "warnings" from even possibly well-meaning advisors. In fact, learning to challenge injected preconceptions, unnoticed even by their transmitters, is one of LSD's most famous, and rewarding, long-term effects. Don't get in over your head, but don't accept that anyone else has more responsibility for that head than you do yourself.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    25. Re:Ah, LSD by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What were your flashbacks like? After paying so often, a freebie might be nice :). Did they last long? Did you realize what was happening? How long after you'd taken the drugs did they occur? Did you take LSD again after the first flashback? Any evolution in the flashback experience? Enquiring minds want to know.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    26. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a very similar experience...well a similar result, with Ecstasy. I, too, was antisocial, and always very concious of what other people thought about me. It made it very hard for me to develop strong bonds with my friends, or to relate well to women. One tablet with my friends, and all of a sudden it was like a door in my head opened up, and I was able to finally see this, and come to the understand that I could just be myself. I think that was a turning point in my life...there was me before E, when I was uncomfortable in my own skin, and me after...the real me. After that experience, I made more friends, related to people better, improved my interpersonal skills for my career, and had the confidence to pursue the girl of my dreams and marry her. Oh, and before I took E, I had a psychosomatic stutter. I came to understand that this was because I was so uncomfortable with people, and since I realized I didn't have to be anymore, I lost my stutter. One $20 pill for one night sure beats $5,000 in speech therapy and years of work.

      I took it a few times after that, and had a good time, but never had those kinds of personal revelations again.

    27. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. Since I advocated the use LSD or shrooms, please note: Never, ever, ever, ever take it alone and if you have never taken it, take it with some one who has. If you don't follow those rules, you will have a bad time. Guaranteed.

      Not true. Yes, psychedelics are serious shit. They're not to be toyed with. And having someone around is a good idea, especially if you're new to the experience. But if you're an experienced tripper, there's nothing wrong with going it alone.

      I'd even say that company holds one back from the more interesting aspects of the experience. It's hard to experience ego loss when there are people around asking, "how are YOU doing? do YOU want a glass of water? do YOU see what I see?" The whole point of taking these drugs is to explore your mind, being reminded of the outside world doesn't make that any easier.

      P.S. remember when you take these drugs, hallucinations (aka "visuals") are a _side effect_.

    28. Re:Ah, LSD by Dever · · Score: 1
      drugs, like many things can open your mind awesomely. if you have no interest in an open mind and or ideas (intentions?) to make the experience a productive one, it does little good.

      many people seem to not be aware of these things though.

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
    29. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. remember when you take these drugs, hallucinations (aka "visuals") are a _side effect_.

      AMEN!

    30. Re:Ah, LSD by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Added to friends list. :)

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    31. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      LSD certainly helped me out immensely. I used to be very shy and pretty antisocial. This is hard to explain but when I first did acid, I was able to have two very distinct tracks of thought one which was me interacting with people, and the other which was me observing myself interacting with people. I saw that what I had always thought of as people being antisocial toward me, was an illusion. These people behaved the same way toward me as they did everyone else... it was me who was being antisocial. After that trip I was able to change the way I reacted to people, and finally have normal relationships with the people around me.
      Your experience mirrors mine almost exactly. A very few LSD experiences (with good, experienced friends) improved my "socialness" to an immense degree.
      I've done LSD a few times since then, and have never had a bad trip, or any sort of flashbacks.
      Same. I don't know, of course, but I suspect there is a major difference between use and abuse--and what you and I are discussing is definitely the former.

      Posting AC to protect my job prospects... :rolleyes:
    32. Re:Ah, LSD by hxnwix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've observed the same. Close-minded socialites learn nothing... from anything, ever. Their world is their social status, not themselves - psychedelics can't transform such people into pondering, introverted, interesting souls.

      I know many such hopeless cases and I've seen them "trip balls" and fail to pick up anything from the experience. I also know interesting folks that ate magic mushrooms, profoundly improved their attitudes and finally faced issues that had dogged them for years.

      Obdurate individuals tend to remain so, but the handful of psychedelic chemicals can and has helped thoughtful, sensitive people through chronic psychological impasses.

    33. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the short time I experienced them (a little under two years) it was the sudden apearance of mild tracers, followed by the realization that I had 'that' mindset though not strongly.
      And yeah it's usually some sort of stress that sets it off. In my case it was usually nicotine withdraw in the middle of the night that woke me up.
      Needless to say it was kinda cool to wave the lit cigarrete around in the dark with the tracers going on.
      I've since quite both, then got a stressfull job and started smoking again after five years without. I'm quiting again RSN (already down by 50%, figure I can go cold turkey from here in a few days, just like last time)

    34. Re:Ah, LSD by Scaba · · Score: 3, Funny
      Those clowns acted like jocks act pretty much the world over. If you met them at a party and they were tripping pretty hard, they would babble at you with some sheepish grin on their faces, but the rest of the time they were getting into fights, date-raping girls, tricking out cars, getting drunk, and refusing to pay for abortions just like the rest of 'em.

      Dude, you were in school with George Bush?

    35. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But where do you get it?

    36. Re:Ah, LSD by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      this is terrible advice. DMT is definately not a drug for unexperienced psychonauts

      --
      TIAEAE!
    37. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humm sounds like a robot I know. In an episode I remember. Or was I on LSD.

  4. Whoa by stoneymonster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll download this as soon as my mouse stops snapping at my like an alligator.

  5. Only fitting... by Jetson · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... that it would be posted by someone named Timothy.

  6. Did someone say Acid? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

    Mmmmmmmmm.... Duff Brand LSD... (Drool)...

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    1. Re:Did someone say Acid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAH WHAT A HILARIOUS POST
      INGENIOUS SIMPOSONS REFERENCES ALWAYS GET MY VOTE

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!

  7. Is he on drugs? by fantomas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Releasing a valuable literary work under such a hippy, liberal, communist style copyright agreement? with all sorts of potential financial opportunities such as sales to Hollywood, serialisation in popular magazines, web based commercial exploitation? Is the author mad? IS HE ON DRUGS?

    1. Re:Is he on drugs? by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      sir or madam:

      you have officially been marked for quotation on the back cover of any future re-release.

      --transient0 (aka Frank Duff)

    2. Re:Is he on drugs? by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

      Too bad there's not a slashdot modifier "Score +1, Fucking Awesome" or equivalent.

      --

      In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
  8. As Jerry once said... by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Jerry Garcia (quoted during an interview with Rolling Stone in 1991):

    Psychedelics showed me a whole other universe, hundreds and millions of universes. So that was an incredibly positive experience. But on the other hand, I can't take psychedelics and perform as a professional. I might go out onstage and say, 'Hey, fuck this, I want to go chase butterflies!'

    1. Re:As Jerry once said... by mkro · · Score: 1

      Ob joke:
      What did one deadhead say to the other when they ran out of acid?
      - Man, this music sucks!

      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    2. Re:As Jerry once said... by Pat69 · · Score: 1

      Too bad they couldn't show him how to write good music.

      --
      You get what you pay for - if you're lucky.
    3. Re:As Jerry once said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who knows anything about music will agree that dead music is some of the most innovative, technical music out there. How often do you see timings in 11/8, 12/8, 7/8, or 10/4? Oh, an I have to disagree with Jerry a bit, the Dead played amazingly on acid!

    4. Re:As Jerry once said... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      I'd like to hear some recommendations for albums to check out.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    5. Re:As Jerry once said... by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      "Live Dead". One of the best live albums ever made. No, the very best. Second place, "Bless it's Pointed Little Head", Jefferson Airplane. Third place..."Wheels of Fire", Cream. Fourth, "Live at Leeds", The Who. Anyway, "Live Dead" is the best Dead album ever made. If you don't like it, you ain't gonna like the Dead.

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  9. It's appropriate by savagedome · · Score: 1

    My largest complaint with Lysergically Yours is that it is too short. Weighing in at 120 pages, the book is an easy read but leaves you feeling that it could have easily been expanded to fill twice as many.

    Oh the irony!

    1. Re:It's appropriate by Sogol · · Score: 1

      I printed it out with Open Office (.25" margins, 10 point Courier font): 33 Pages in total.

    2. Re:It's appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I dont see the irony. can you explain this?

    3. Re:It's appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a guess... maybe it'd be more ironic (and make more sense) if the book was 210 pages long?

  10. Unix Retrospective by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Funny

    "this is a novel which deals in part with the synthesis of and culture surrounding LSD."

    I see. So basically a tale of the origins of unix? :-)

    1. Re:Unix Retrospective by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 1

      LSD - BSD... You tell me.

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    2. Re:Unix Retrospective by wahsapa · · Score: 0

      'Onlt two good things came out of Berkeley: Unix and LSD'

    3. Re:Unix Retrospective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idjit. Unix came from New Jersey.

    4. Re:Unix Retrospective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idjit. LSD came from Switzerland.

    5. Re:Unix Retrospective by Black+Art · · Score: 1

      More like the origins of the sendmail.cf file.

      --
      "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    6. Re:Unix Retrospective by zonker · · Score: 0

      please explain the "visual" origins of vi...

  11. Regarding conciousness by toasted_calamari · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have never taken hallucinagens, so I cannot comment from personal experience, but I have always wondered whether the "new modes of conciousness" so often reported are actually new ways of looking at the world, or merely hallucinations themselves.

    As a reference point, I would suggest reading the book Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman by Physicist Richard Feynman. One chapter in particular discusses the authors experiences with halluncination in a sensory depravation chamber.

    During one experience in the chamber, Feynman came to understand exactly how memories were organized in the brain. It made perfect sense, however, upon leaving the chamber, he realized that what had made perfect sense an hour ago, was absolutly rediculous. His understanding had been no more real than the things he was seeing in the chamber.

    1. Re:Regarding conciousness by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

      They change your perception and subsequently understanding of the world around you. A powerful psychoactive such as LSD distorts reality around you and inside you.. so much so that illogical understandings arrise.

      But, those understandings are the most logical thing ever when on said psychotropic.

      --
      Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    2. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how did he know that his sense was correct after he got out? What if it really did make perfect sense, but he was hallucinating its nonsensicalness after he got out? What if our normal perception of reality is the hallucination, and the trip is the real thing?

      Woah.

    3. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quote the movie Face Off:

      Dietrich: No more drugs for THAT man!

    4. Re:Regarding conciousness by Unnngh! · · Score: 1
      Reality is basically just an agreement--most /. readers, for example, agree on the english language, and can communicate. People agree that houses are built a certain way, people of certain standing/class/taste dress a certain way, etc. This creates a social landscape.

      Psychedelics and extreme shock (grief, physical shock, etc.) put you in a different frame of reference, a different set of agreements, or a different reality. So, you may have some great insight as to why that tree appears to be growing while you're tripping, but when you come down it's nothing that you or anyone else would agree on and consequently is not "real". Try talking to someone on drugs--they seem very unreal and you will probably look like a dumbass b/c you aren't perceiving the same things at all.

      Thus Feinman's perception of something very profound in state B was completely useless in state A, but seemed very real in state B and probably would still seem real if he returned to state B.

      Drugs are just bad, mmmhay?

    5. Re:Regarding conciousness by pclminion · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I have never taken hallucinagens, so I cannot comment from personal experience, but I have always wondered whether the "new modes of conciousness" so often reported are actually new ways of looking at the world, or merely hallucinations themselves.

      It is difficult, as a person who has experienced hallucinogenic states, to explain to someone who hasn't, just what it's really like. There is definitely something to be learned by experiencing these altered states. It helps to remind us that what we experience in our minds as "reality" is anything but real, and that we really don't have direct access to "reality" as it truly exists. It even might cause you to doubt that there is anything such as the "true nature" of things.

      Feynman had an idea, which when he moved to a profoundly different mental environment, appeared ridiculous. The important lesson to be learned here is that what seems very reasonable and sane about reality could be equally ridiculous, and we're just in the wrong frame of mind to "see" it.

      His understanding had been no more real than the things he was seeing in the chamber.

      That's really the entire point. Who knows what "real" is, when your conscious perceptions of reality can be so profoundly altered by taking a few milligrams (or in this case, micrograms) of some chemical compound?

      In a psychedelic state, it is common to look at normal waking life that used to seem so normal, and feel that it is completely ridiculous.

      In fact, there is no logical basis to claim that either state is "real," or "ridiculous." Drugs whack you upside the head with the philosophical truth that "reality," as we commonly define it, doesn't really exist in any relevant way. It is only psychological reality which matters.

      (BTW, I haven't taken any psychedelic compounds in a long time, and don't plan to again.)

    6. Re:Regarding conciousness by TopShelf · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The best way I can think to explain it is that the hallucinations aren't so much about perceiving things that aren't there, but rather having the aspects of the things around you emphasized in various ways. This may lead the user to make connections between things that they otherwise would not have.

      For example, as the walls begin to weave back and forth like the room is breathing, you gain new appreciation for the detail of woodgrain, and see how it's not just a static pattern represented on a surface, but instead is the end result of a living process that brought those fibers together, only to be frozen in place at the moment that tree was cut down and turned into lumber.

      It's a difficult concept to communicate, and while it's been a long time since I've had any such adventures, I can definitely say that they opened my mind up in a positive way. It's like Chef once said on South Park, "there's a time and a place for everything, and it's called College ."

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    7. Re:Regarding conciousness by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Who knows what "real" is, when your conscious perceptions of reality can be so profoundly altered by taking a few milligrams (or in this case, micrograms) of some chemical compound? In a psychedelic state, it is common to look at normal waking life that used to seem so normal, and feel that it is completely ridiculous.
      But surely you see where one could make the argument that this is more rationally seen as evidence of a chronic dysfunction of the brain caused by the use of drugs than as evidence of any "heightened mental state." You're going to experience what most people accept as "reality" for all of the period of your life that you spend not under the influence of psychedelic drugs. It's the default state of the organism. Why assume that it's an aberrant or erroneous state, just because you can produce a different state by introducing foreign chemical compounds into the system? It makes more sense to assume that the post-chemical state is aberrant.

      Or, to put it another way, countless books, pamphelets, plays, movies, and rambling diaries have been produced attempting to explain or prove the profound revelations produced by the use of hallucinogens, and in every case, it seems to me that the "revelations" can be very simply illustrated with the following statement:

      Drugs get you high.
      Can't we all just admit it and move on?
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    8. Re:Regarding conciousness by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like many others here, I'm sure, I've had some experience here in the past. While many times the hallucinations might appear to be meaningless after the effects have worn off, and maybe in many senses they are meaningless, it's that they're profound and meaningful at the time that is often what's important.

      In many ways, we are the sum of our experiences, whether based in "normal reality" or some altered state of it. LSD causes the reality you experience to be very profound, emotionally and psychologically, and this can lead to very important changes after the fact.

      While I think there is a great deal of potential for therapeutic LSD use (in the 60s, they had fairly good success in combatting alcoholism with it), it can be equally dangerous.

      In my own case, I managed to overcome a good deal of shyness through a single LSD experience, that has lasted to this day (some 18 or 19 years later). I chalk this up to the power of the emotions I felt regarding my shyness at the time. On the other hand, I know people who have been emotionally scarred for many years from "bad trips" for precisely the same reason.

      As for other "uses" that are productive, there is sometimes an ability to handle abstract problem solving that can be associated with LSD experiences. In many cases, people have solved real-life problems through LSD, in fields of Architecture, Physics, and I'm sure others as well. I don't know that I would ever use it for that purpose, but I've seen a good deal of anecdotal evidence that it exists, and from my own experiences, I would tend to believe it. After all, you're simply much more open to different ways of looking at or approaching problems and sometimes that's all it takes to solve it.

    9. Re:Regarding conciousness by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Of course, things like gravity are still real and have real effects at great heights.

    10. Re:Regarding conciousness by misleb · · Score: 1
      But, those understandings are the most logical thing ever when on said psychotropic

      I have to disagree. I wouldn't call my understandings while under the influence of LSD logical. Yeah, illogical things can make "sense" while under the influence, but they never seem particularly logical. The LSD understanding is much more akin to intuition. Just as valid, IMO.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    11. Re:Regarding conciousness by flacco · · Score: 1
      It helps to remind us that what we experience in our minds as "reality" is anything but real, and that we really don't have direct access to "reality" as it truly exists.

      this was the most profound revelation i had during my limited experience with hallucinogens. it made me aware of how limited our perceptions are - both sensory and logical.

      that said, i don't think i'll ever touch the stuff again (it's been 13 years for me). while it's important to know about the fallibility of your senses, it's also kind of demoralizing to be reminded of it :-)

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    12. Re:Regarding conciousness by blincoln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My experience was that the value of psychedelics was not in any supposed revelations about the outside world, but what they revealed about me.

      It's been a long time since I've used any psychoactives other than alcohol (I even gave up caffeine last year), but I tried LSD, mushrooms, dextromethorphan, and even PCP once (that was an accident, we thought it was something else) when I was younger. My memory of all of them was kind of like the cave in Empire Strikes Back - what you experience is "only what you take with you."

      Seeing the entire world visibly altered by your perception of yourself can be a really powerful experience, and tell you a lot about who you are. I worry about the people who take LSD, then see a monster when they look in the mirror. Maybe it's just self-doubt, but maybe there is a valid reason why they see themselves that way.

      It's really too bad that the majority point of view seems to be that psychedelics are something that should be banned. There are certainly some dangerous drugs out there, but other than nightmare-incuding substances like PCP I would say that they're all in the same general safety range as alcohol, especially when used in the proper setting.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    13. Re:Regarding conciousness by back_pages · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Just have a few moments to drop a note.

      I had a rather peculiar home life and developed into an extremely self concious, introverted, self loathing kid. My mother was chronically depressed, my dad worked enough so that I only saw him on weekends, I found out later that my siblings and I were intentionally kept seperated from our extended family because of emotional rifts between my (Ma & Pa) and their siblings. I had an incredibly difficult time interacting with my peers, was gifted (enough to eventually score 2200 on the GREs without studying) but on the fast road to flunking out of high school.

      And then after some experimental tries, I dosed on 7.5 hits of gel tab and sat around a playground at 1am. I climbed up the slide, sat on the top, and intended to slide down it. As I sat at the top, I looked up at the stars and was immediately struck by the oddness of my situation. I was legally insane, sitting on a slide on a cloudless moonlit night, and staring straight up at the stars.

      And then I was hit with the question: "What am I like?" It just kept going through my head over and over until the syllables didn't even sound like English. The phrase was just some gibberish that inquired about the most fundamental core of my whole identity. "What am I like?"

      Then I felt like the star above me was perfectly in line with my spine, that the universe was locked onto me and turning around me. (This has always been my way of relating to Achilleus - the one Man in history with the audacity, confidence, blackened heart, and glory to defy the gods. This is mostly tangential, hence the parenthesis, but at the time Achilleus was my most idolized literay figure and therefore this had great coincidential significance.)

      I sat like this for probably 15 minutes. "What am I like?" Fuck it, at my core, I am everybody else.

      I did not slide down that slide. While I was up there, the act of sliding down really took on a monumental significance to me, but I can't really define it. I climbed back down the ladder.

      Ever since that night, I've felt like I'm just as valuable a person as anyone else. I assert myself, I speak up, I feel like I'm worthy of being liked.

      As another poster described, it is incredibly difficult to relate your LSD experiences to someone who hasn't taken them, but that was my two cents. LSD can be some dangerous shit, but rightly or wrongly, I feel like I got 15 years of therapy in 15 minutes.

    14. Re:Regarding conciousness by iabervon · · Score: 1

      One thing you have to realize is that most of the world we experience isn't objectively real. The colors you perceive around you are highly affected by your perception of lighting conditions, for example, and so what is sometimes experienced as a red object under white light is at other times experienced as a white object under red light, despite exactly the same emitted light. There are also two spots where your retinas have no sensitivity, but your brain fills in the information.

      So your everyday experience is a big hallucination which correlates well with some properties of interest in the real world. Hallucinogens will change your perceptions such that your experience correlates well with different properties of the real world, which you will find strange. In fact, you are likely to experience something closer to your actual perception than to the conventional processed version your brain normally produces. You might see a bowl of water as being full of flashes of light, when it does actually produce flashes of light by reflecting with little waves; under normal conditions, you would experience it as a bowl of water shaking slightly under a light.

      So the difference between what we call normal perception and hallucination is not whether our brains make up what we see, but whether what they make up is a useful description of the real world. Internal features like "modes of consciousness" aren't part of the real world anyway, so it is hard to say what the difference between a real mode of conscious and a hallucinated one would be.

    15. Re:Regarding conciousness by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. Nothing puts you in a different state of reality. It just puts up an additional filter between your mind and reality. We've already discovered ways in which our direct senses are already a bit of a distortion of reality - for example, our sense of color is just a crude approximation of the actual spectrum, and it is inaccurate and it can be fooled (for example, red light and green light do not actually combine to form yellow light, but it looks like they do simply because our eyes cannot disginguish between one single yellow spike on the spectrum and two smaller red and green spikes on the spectrum - both result in the same data reaching the brain. Shine that light through a prism to split out the rainbow and you can see the difference, but look at it directly and you cannot.)

      So our senses are already an abstraction of reality. Taking drugs does NOT alter your reality anymore than putting on color-tinted glasses does. While wearing the glasses the color of objects changes in your vision, but the reality of them hasn't been affected in the slightest.

      To say that taking drugs puts you in a different reality is to argue in favor of solipsism.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    16. Re:Regarding conciousness by redivider · · Score: 1

      Well by that same logic, our "normal," sober experience of reality isn't necessarily an indication of what the absolute reality actually is... if that makes any sense. We have evolved in a certain way and we experience reality through the filter of our own bodies and minds. Just because LSD only adds to (or subtracts from) that filter, that doesn't make the experience that you have any less "real." It's just from a different perspective. I know that sounds sort of ridiculous, but I just have a hard time with the idea that because human beings experience "reality" in a certain way, that that somehow defines what reality actually is. And that's not to say that I even disagree whit.. just adding to the discussion.

      --
      Sinch
    17. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drugs don't put an additonal filter between your mind and reality, your consciousness just interprets the data differently.

    18. Re:Regarding conciousness by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > His understanding had been no more real than the things he was seeing in the chamber.
      >
      > That's really the entire point. Who knows what "real" is, when your conscious perceptions of reality can be so profoundly altered by taking a few milligrams (or in this case, micrograms) of some chemical compound?

      Reality is what your instruments measure, and what your friends' instruments measure when they try to measure whatever it was that you were measuring. To put it more poetically:

      "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it"
      - Phillip. K. Dick

      > Drugs whack you upside the head with the philosophical truth that "reality," as we commonly define it, doesn't really exist in any relevant way. It is only psychological reality which matters.

      Anyone who claims that "only psychological reality matters" has never tried to dribble a[n American] football.

    19. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My experience has actually been the opposite. On acid you have _less_ of a filter. It disables a lot of your mind's ability to aggregate information.

      For example instead of seeing a wooden table, you see a brown square. The layer of your filtering that normally translates it to "table" isn't working very well, so your high level conscious mind does the translating, and not very well.

      This is where a lot of the fun comes in; it's why you see funny things and they move around. It's also where you have a lot of enlightening experiences, because it turns out that what you had hard-wired was wrong.

    20. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me crazy, but most of the people I know with really distorted worldviews have either been into heavy drugs or very permiscuous sex. I think either one leads to some sort of brain altering that is not healthy.

    21. Re:Regarding conciousness by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      "so it is hard to say what the difference between a real mode of conscious and a hallucinated one would be."

      One that we are biologically predisposed to, perhaps?

    22. Re:Regarding conciousness by juuri · · Score: 1

      Reality is what your instruments measure, and what your friends' instruments measure when they try to measure whatever it was that you were measuring.

      Just because you and your friends agree it is true and the instruments you have setup to measure in a specific way give you results you expect, doesn't mean it is true. History is filled with scientific "truths" that are later invalidated... and this will probably continue until we manage to get a big ol' theory of everything.

      With that said, I feel there is a demonstrable value to most anything that will satisfy most requirements of being factual enough to constitute reality.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    23. Re:Regarding conciousness by Raven_Stark · · Score: 1

      I've never tried LSD but I didn't inhale once and had a pretty good trip which I'd have to say was beneficial to me, although quite painful.

      I was harrased by a surly dieffenbachia plant which followed me around calling me a faggot. It's voice was filthy (could literally see it's voice was covered with shit), harsh and violent and made me feel very ashamed and self-conscious. Its voice was familiar but I couldn't place it. As my ego boundaries broke down, I kept "becoming" family members on my father's side (see the Beatles "I am the Walrus"). I felt intense revulsion over that happening. I didn't become myself again until I embraced the plant and the other people and faced my fears. I did it because I'd read that when having a bad trip it is best to confront the monsters rather than run away. (Anyone considering using drugs should read extensively first for the best possible outcome.)

      I realized my mind was sort of telling me something in my mind's own language. For instance, dieffenbachia is commonly called dumb cane because it's sap makes the mouth swell so that speech becomes difficult. I realized its voice was my father's voice or at least what my fathers voice should sound like if it were to express his personality accurately. I was in a way reliving a memory of him punching me in the mouth and calling me a faggot. The shit in his voice was because he literally kicked the shit out of me that time. I was also reliving my mother telling me I was "just like him." She immediately took back those words, but they stuck in my head and triggered a lot of self-hatred. By embracing the plant and the relatives, I in effect was accepting myself, the good, the bad and the ugly. Dittos for reality. I also realized that I'd become a goody-two-shoes to keep my mother from leaving me as she did my dad. I now am myself not whom I thought she wanted me to be. I wish I could say that I've fully worked through this experience but I think it will take a few more years. I don't regret it a bit though, was fascinating and keeps paying dividends on the $20 investment.

      There was a more pleasurable side to it too. I can see beauty everywhere now, even in things that are also ugly. I feel as if I were born blind and deaf but can now see and hear for the first time. Life the universe and everything are wondrously beautiful.

      However, much of it, I think, will never make sense to me. For instance, I saw real trees that morphed vertically into steps going up to a castle. Was pretty and groovy but means nothing to me. Maybe Feynman's mind only composed simmilar meaningless imagery. Maybe all of my imagery was random but I assigned meaning to it; does it matter?

      --
      http://www.marxist.com/
    24. Re:Regarding conciousness by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      When I'm perfectly sober (which is all the time), and I look at a table, I see BOTH a table and a rectangular shape. The two perceptions occur simultaneously at two different levels of conscious thought - just like when someone says the word "Cat" I imagine a furry animal while at the same time perceiving a 'k' sound followed by a 'ah' sound, followed by a 't' sound.

      The conscious mind is not a single one-layer entity. Human beings can think different thoughts in parallel, provided they aren't all at the same level of complexity. Or at least, I'm assuming they can because I know that "I" can do so.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    25. Re:Regarding conciousness by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does sound ridiculous because the concept of what you experinece is different from what is really out there in a few ways. There is quite clearly a "reality" that is merely being mapped into conscious experience, but is seperate from it. Therefore to say that reality is being altered when your mind is being altered makes no sense. Your mind wasn't even showing you reality in the first place. You're saying that our disconnect from reality means that both drugged and nondrugged experiences are both real. I'm saying that neither one is, but one is closer than the other.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    26. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "reality," as we commonly define it, doesn't really exist in any relevant way

      So feel free to drop some acid and step in front a bus. I'm sure its lack of reality won't affect you in any relevant way given your psychological reality.

    27. Re:Regarding conciousness by vandan · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      I am not the first to note that using psychedelics affects probability in alarming ways. Synchronistic events occur in rapid succession. Multiple events, each of which would appear to be only just barely possible themselves, occur one after the other. Psychedelics allow the mind to bend probablility distribution curves.

      And then there's telepathy. It's always funny to watch a newcomer to the psychedelic world change their opinion on telepathy 90 minutes after taking their chosen substance.

      Taking psycedelics definitely does place you in a different reality - one that co-incides with our everyday reality in many ways, but certainly one that differs from ours in some very important areas.

      Those who don't believe me are warmly invited to spend a night at a rave with us to see for themselves.

    28. Re:Regarding conciousness by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Granted I've almost done no drugs, including alcohol. I'm not the type to use chemicals as a regular social activity.

      There's somthing about breaking a thing that teaches you how it works.

      Do you remember what it was like when you were young to look at English and not be able to read it? You just can't do that today. Try looking at this sentene and NOT reading it. Perception isn't somthing that 'you do' but somthing that is done to you, mostly out of your conscious control. And most people take it for granted or associate with it.

      Given, a lot of people take drugs as a form of escape. But there's so much that our brain does recognizing objects, discerning patterns, etc. and it does so effortlessly that we forget it's happening. By changing our perceptions, by temporarily dissasociating us from our biases, it's possible to perceive them.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    29. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I feel like I got 15 years of therapy in 15 minutes.

      I had a lot of family problems in my developmental years as well. The end result was that by my early teen years I'd developed into a pretty emotionally unstable person. Eventually I couldn't live with either myself or the world around me and decided to kill myself. I'd also heard of ayahuasca, and the reports by people who claimed it was medicine for the soul. That sounded exactly like what I needed, so I figured it was worth a try - if it didn't work than I could always go back to the original plan of suicide.

      That experiment changed everything for me. In those few hours my ego was stripped away, and I was able to examine my life from another viewpoint. Not only that, but I was forced to see just how much beauty there was in the world. I realised that I'd been avoiding doing both of these for most of my life. I was given an amazing chance to see that I'd been avoiding anything good in life, in order to make sure that it wouldn't be taken away from me as my family had been.

      I'm not going to claim the ayahuasca healed me, like psychotherapy it just alowed me another viewpoint to allow me to heal myself. But without it I'm certain I never would have reached a point in my life where I'd have been able to do so. Especially given that I'd tried therapy before, and had never had much luck with it. I have little doubt that if it wasn't for ayahuasca, I'd be long dead at this point.

    30. Re:Regarding conciousness by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think an important distinction many people don't make is between thoughts that occur during altered states and thoughts that occur when reflecting upon one's experience in altered states.

      With almost any psychoactive drugs, thoughts will occur to you that "seemed like a good idea at the time". Alcohol might have you convinced that you want to take your pants off and dance on the bar. Pot might tell you that you really need some nachos. Cocaine will tell you that thing that will make your life better is some more cocaine. LSD might tell you that the floor is made of lava and you really need to go to connect with the universe by playing all of your records backwards. Amphetmines will tell you that everything you do is perfect and that food and sleep aren't really necessary. And they all tell you that you're being perfectly rational.

      Any of these things might be perfectly good ideas, but far too many people forget that the drug is imposing it's own sort rationality on you, in the same way that dreams, as real as they seem, are never actually realistic.

      As with dreams, however, there are real benefits to reflecting upon one's experiences with drugs. The very fact that these drugs are able to modify your senses in such profound ways tells you something about how unreliable and malleable your senses really are. The fact that they can effect your ability to reason can make you question how 'pure' your reasoning is without drugs.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    31. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the good old mind vs matter problem...

      Still too few people realize that counsciousness is indeed a creative process. The so-called 'mind' conducting measurements ('perception') spontaneously on the quantum web of the so-called 'matter' ('reality'). Our physical world thus exists through, or rather, is brought to existence by the interaction of mind & matter. The so-called 'objective reality' (matter not interacting with mind) does not exist. Actually, there are no such things as 'mind-altering drugs' either...

      Beleive me, i must know IAAP ;-)
      Science IS magick.

    32. Re:Regarding conciousness by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      There was a more pleasurable side to it too. I can see beauty everywhere now, even in things that are also ugly. I feel as if I were born blind and deaf but can now see and hear for the first time. Life the universe and everything are wondrously beautiful.

      That happened to me as well, after my first experience with ayahuasca. I really didn't have any actual perception of beauty before then. The world was something to hurt and be hurt in, not somewhere where one could appreciate the mere existance of anything. After the ayahuasca though, and ever since then, I've been actuly aware of how beautiful everything is. Even, as you say, ugly things. Which is something I've often found very difficult to talk about to people who havn't had similar experiences. It's one of those things which seems possible to express on an intellectual basis, but which is very difficult to actually integrate into life or to actually internalise. At least without a little chemical help.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    33. Re:Regarding conciousness by Hatta · · Score: 1

      But surely you see where one could make the argument that this is more rationally seen as evidence of a chronic dysfunction of the brain caused by the use of drugs than as evidence of any "heightened mental state."

      I certainly see that.

      Why assume that it's an aberrant or erroneous state, just because you can produce a different state by introducing foreign chemical compounds into the system? It makes more sense to assume that the post-chemical state is aberrant.

      Why assume that either state tells you everything there is to know about reality? Why ignore the fact that your standard waking conscious state IS a chemical induced state? All you do when you take a drug is shift the equilibrium around a little. Some concepts won't be represented as well, other concepts may be represented better.

      As they say, the proof of the pudding is in the tasting. So if LSD tells you something, think about it, and see if it applies to your life. On the whole, the bad data is plentiful, but easy to spot, and really of little consequence. The good data however, is frequently profound.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    34. Re:Regarding conciousness by Hatta · · Score: 1

      LSD can be some dangerous shit, but rightly or wrongly, I feel like I got 15 years of therapy in 15 minutes.

      Yeah, time dilation is a common effect. :)

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    35. Re:Regarding conciousness by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      You're going to experience what most people accept as "reality" for all of the period of your life that you spend not under the influence of psychedelic drugs. It's the default state of the organism.

      The thing is drugs like LSD make you realize that this EXACT point is false. They show you that what you experience in your normal reality is just that - your SUBJECTIVE reality. Colored by everything from the language you speak to how good your eyesight is to whether you prefer sweet to sour.

      You wake up to the fact that your brain does not perceive in the same manner as everyone elses. Your "software" interprets and places relevance and value on different things than your neighbors. This is why Star Wars is lame to one person and an obsession to another. Whether or not there is an objective reality is pretty irrelevant. The only things that are relevent are your subjective reality and the consensual reality you agree to exist in with those around you (i.e. we all agree this green piece of paper can be exchanged for a candy bar within these geographic boundaries).

      Your brain creates an interpretive map of the world you navigate and no two individuals maps are the same (never mistake the map for the territory).

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    36. Re:Regarding conciousness by mattrumpus · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but why the fuck does someone who has "never taken hallucinagens" feel like they NEED to contribute to this discussion? It really bothers me that you sooooo much want to be part of this that the best you can do is reference someone else talking about something that is at best distantly connected. If you sooooo much want to participate why don't you try HALLUCINAGENS? WHY? Try, then talk.

      --
      Who's with me?! I SAID... WHO'S WITH ME!!??
    37. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are certainly some dangerous drugs out there, but other than nightmare-incuding substances like PCP I would say that they're all in the same general safety range as alcohol, especially when used in the proper setting.

      I have a friend who took LSD with me over a period of about a year and a half. We didn't get too crazy for the most part. Lowish dosages, good friends. All good.

      Then one night we decided to do a kind of heavy dose. No more than we'd done before, but at the high end. Thing was, it was a particularly strong batch, and we didn't know that yet (as best I can tell, there's no such thing as "bad acid", though bad setting or mood combined with high doses is pretty much the same result).

      We came on within TEN MINUTES! If you've done LSD or seen people do it, you probably know it takes about 20-40 minutes to come on... not this time. We knew from the start it was going to be an ... interesting evening. I remember thinking about half way through that it wasn't fun. It wasn't unpleasant per se, but all of my attention was focused on tring to focus. I wanted to get back to the point that I was just lucid enough to enjoy it, and that point never came.

      Sometime in the wee hours, as the peak was finally fading one of my friends started to lose it. From there until the end of the trip is was one of the most unpleasant experiences of my life. When you're trying to count the flowers on the wall, it's kind of cool that you're messed up. When you're trying to talk a friend down from a bad trip, it's just awful. You want to help, but everything is exaderated and nothing is quite linear enough to follow.

      Six months later I got a phone call. My friend was in a mental institution after spending 6 months not sleeping because of delusions and nightmares.

      Are hallucinogens dangerous? You bet your sweet ass they are! Are they fun? Yep, that too. I've taken LSD, mushrooms, X, 2CT7, 2CT2, and smoked weed. I gave it all up because I didn't want my friend (who was really upset that he "couldn't take it") to have the reminder. In the end, perhaps the most powerful non-Nancy Regan lesson is that friendship is more important than the drugs.

      If you want to experiment, I won't try to talk you out of it. There are some insights that I got on LSD especially that I'll treasure for the rest of my life. But, be careful. Don't trust that the dose is well-measured, because the difference between 10 micrograms and 1000 micrograms isn't something you can really measure in your average apparment. If you must take any, take small doses so that a mistake isn't as big a deal, and if you start to have a bad time, don't wig out... just change your setting and try to relax. The phrase "this too shall pass" got me through a few odd bits myself. If you have a bad trip and then start having panic attacks, nightmares or any other psycological effects days later, go see a psycologist. If you're really bad off, you're going to need some help, and that's OK. Whatever you do DO NOT try to use psycoactive drugs again for a good long time (a year at least, preferably forever).

      I'm NOT advocating drug use, but I am saying that if you are going to do it, do it right. Never trip alone if you can help it (and you can), and never trip with people you don't know and trust. If you can have someone around who isn't tripping and who you think of as "responsible", that's extra good.

    38. Re:Regarding conciousness by elmegil · · Score: 1
      You're going to experience what most people accept as "reality" for all of the period of your life that you spend not under the influence of psychedelic drugs. It's the default state of the organism.

      The thing is drugs like LSD make you realize that this EXACT point is false.

      Exactly. Not only that, but the argument that the grandparent poster is making has another dimension of incorrectness as well: drugs are not the only means to alter your consciousness or your experience of what "reality" is. Throughout human history there are ample examples of people putting themselves into extreme situations, sometimes with drugs, sometimes through "aceticism" aka deprivation, sometimes through meditation (a la India's yogis), and using the insights gained from stepping outside their "normal" realities to inform them when they returned to normal reality.

      Default state doesn't mean that other states are worthless.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    39. Re:Regarding conciousness by swillden · · Score: 1

      History is filled with scientific "truths" that are later invalidated.

      This is incorrect. History is filled with scientific theories that are later invalidated. Measurements are observations, and observations cannot be invalidated, except perhaps by proving that the observer was lying.

      The topic at hand is about observations, not theories.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    40. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that they're all in the same general safety range as alcohol

      That seems like a very good reason to ban them.

      Banning alcohol causes more problems than it solves because it's so embedded in our society, but we'd all be much better off without it.

    41. Re:Regarding conciousness by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 1

      Man, I get nervous flashing my BIOS, never mind messing with my *brain*. Screw that. No amount of supposed insight, or entertainment is worth the risk to me.

      -Z

    42. Re:Regarding conciousness by ajs · · Score: 1

      Banning alcohol causes more problems than it solves because it's so embedded in our society, but we'd all be much better off without it.

      No, banning alcohol causes problems because it's something people want enough to circumvent the law, and that creates a black market. Black markets are dangerous and harmful to normal markets.

      Let's just take as an example, Marajuanna (a drug which I would argue is far less harmful than Alcohol or Tobacco).

      Right now it's illegal. This means that everyone who sells it does to in secret, so you have no real way to control how it's processed and distributed. What would happen if it were legal?

      For one, the financial benefiots are gigantic. Taxation is obvious and often cited, but then there's the fact that the companies growing it will be real companies that actually employ people in traditional ways that help to strengthen the economy.

      For another, you could cripple the industries that get it into the hands of kids. Many will get it from their parents the way many get alcohol, but ask yourself which you'd rather see: that they got it from their parents or a dealer? 30 years of the war on drugs has proven that none of the above is not an available option.

      You could also slash the budget of the DEA and still step up the amount of money spent on stopping hard drugs. Cost savings AND a boost to law enforcement; imagine that.

      What's more -- and this is a point often missed -- you get to regulate it. That's right, you actually get MORE control over the drugs because they are legal. Why? Because the companies that are selling the drugs put the illegal dealers out of business, and those companies are going to be constrained by the laws far more than the dealers were.

      You also end a lot of violence that hurts hundreds of innocents every year. If you're a drug dealer and another drug dealer does something that hurts your business, you have no recourse to the courts because your business is illegal. So, violence is your only option. Make the drugs legal and the companies can sue each other when they're wronged or even press criminal charges. Notice that as powerfull as R.J. Renolds is, you don't see them gunning down the competition.

      The rule to remember is this: make it illegal and you lose control over it. If the demand is high, you also create a black market.

    43. Re:Regarding conciousness by ajs · · Score: 1
      most of the people I know with really distorted worldviews have either been into heavy drugs or very permiscuous sex

      There are several things in your statement that I think you need to analyze:
      • What do you consider distorted? It might just be that you've lumped those whose world views would pre-dispose them to drug use into that umbrella.
      • How large is your sample set? Anything less than about 20 people who fit this model would be statistically insignificant, and any less than 100 is pretty weak evidence for a link.
      • It sounds like you're fairly conservative (pardon the assumption), so I'm guessing that any train of logic that would lead one to promiscuous sex would probably strike you as "distrorted" in the first place, so again I ask how you're defining the term here.


      As counter-examples, let me point to a few folks who've used drugs:

      President William J. Clinton
      President George W. Bush
      Thomas Alva Edison
      Newt Ginrich
      Thomas Jefferson
      Steve Jobs
      Pope Leo XIII
      Jack Nicholson

      That's just a small list, of course, but it kind of introduces the breadth of personality type and accomplishments that we're talking about here, doesn't it?

      Now, as for having a profound effect: yes. Psychoactive drugs have an effect similar at least in scope to any traumatic (good or bad) event in one's life. Halucinagens especially can result in substantial shifts in world-view. This can be good or bad, and using these drugs without thinking about what you're doing and the magnitude of the choice you are making is just dumb. I wasn't trying to suggest otherwise here, just trying to temper what I see as a rather over-reaching conclusion.
    44. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem Feynman had goes like this:

      When you come down the ability to manipulate your abstract ideas starts to fade. To compensate you start associating them with words in a attempt to hold on to what you discovered. The problem is that words are all connected to lots of other ideas and this association destroys the original meaning you were hoping to protect, making it seem ridiculous.

    45. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you must remain within the confines of the monastery walls grasshopper, for nothing ventured, nothing gained.

    46. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is difficult, as a person who has experienced hallucinogenic states, to explain to someone who hasn't, just what it's really like"

      It's a big surprise. No matter how many books and how many experiences they tell you, it will always be a huge surprise. Nothing like what you expected. And the reason is that under LSD you do not spend so much thought "comparing what you experience with what you were expecting". Grown up humans do that all the time --it's a habit-- and waste precious thought. With LSD you're like a kid for which the world is a big surprise.

      So you can prepare for anything, but in the end it will be NOTHING like what you expected. It's a state of mind.

      Break on through.

    47. Re:Regarding conciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Take hearing for example. Our auditory senses (including the feeling of sounds) are (probably) developed to make us good hunters and good survivors in general.


      For some strange reason, humans have created music. And it's extremely clear to me that our auditory senses were not developed to appreciate music, and that appreciation of music is infintely enhanced on these kind of substances.

    48. Re:Regarding conciousness by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      I worry about the people who take LSD, then see a monster when they look in the mirror.

      This reminds me of a time I looked in a mirror while using LSD. Instead of seeing a simple reflection of my physical appearance I found that I was gazing upon history. The history of myself, my parents, my ancestors from Europe and Japan. I was looking through a genetic temporal looking-glass. The sum of the people who came before me.

      This description is a little simplistic and, of course, I can't describe the emotional impact this had. Overall, it was quite interesting and very positive.

    49. Re:Regarding conciousness by toganet · · Score: 1

      What if Kant had taken psychadelics?

    50. Re:Regarding conciousness by version5 · · Score: 1
      Why assume that it's an aberrant or erroneous state?

      Why do you assume that the default conscious state of the organism accurately reflects reality? Our senses clearly have a limited range in which they operate - for example, the ear can generally perceive roughly 20Hz - 20Khz and no more. Psychologists have done a great deal of experiments on the human mind, and the general consensus is that it is poorly implemented. The brain is incapable of processing the huge amount of data at hand. In order to deal with that, it has developed numerous shortcuts, some learned, some genetic. A great many people walk around with completely ludicrous perceptions of reality that don't stand up to logical analysis in the least, and these are the sober people. Unless you believe that your brain is a perfect perceiving machine, you must agree that your perception of reality is flawed.

      That's not to say that all alternate realities are superior, but since a superior perception of reality is by definition in a set that contains all realities other than the current one, rationally, a drug-induced perception could indeed be a superior one.

      An example of flaws in the perception of reality: The human mind is inclined towards something psychologists call confirmation bias, which is "a type of selective thinking whereby one tends to notice and to look for what confirms one's beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts one's beliefs." When undergoing a psychedelic hallucination where a completely non-sensical world is completely convincing, it casts into doubt the reality that we experience at all times, possibly causing us to rethink some of our beliefs.

      Aside from that, psychedelics greatly enhance your ability to visualize concepts. Visualization is an important part of getting a firm grip on concepts when learning, for example, physics or math. Certain psychedelics bring about an increase in focus and concentration, another obviously useful learning tool.

      A quick survey of the psychedelic experience reveals that its certainly rational and within the realm of possibility to seriously consider alternate realities.

      --

      "It's Dot Com!"

    51. Re:Regarding conciousness by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      "And it's extremely clear to me that our auditory senses were not developed to appreciate music"

      What makes this clear?

    52. Re:Regarding conciousness by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      Do you remember what it was like when you were young to look at English and not be able to read it? You just can't do that today.
      You certainly can, you just need the right drugs.
      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    53. Re:Regarding conciousness by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      That was my point. Drugs are destructive. They break perception. That breaking can be informative.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  12. Can't.....help.......must.....post..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is official; Netcraft confirms: *LSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *LSD community....

  13. Much more interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The book would have been much more interesting if it was Lethargically your...ZZZZZZZZZZ

  14. LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    LSD absorbs 47 times its own weight in excess reality.

  15. LSD in my hometown by Nos. · · Score: 2, Informative
    Most of the early research on LSD was conducted in my hometown of Weyburn (before I was born).
  16. only on slashdot by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Funny

    is the license under which a book is released more interesting than the book itself.

  17. alternative medicine by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you can't obtain real LSD, you can always use banana peels. For real history see Michael Hollingshead [clue: he's the guy that turned Leary onto LSD!]

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:alternative medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amusing thing is the double take that occured when I read the last name while scanning the posts. It's funny because it's my surname and it's not exactly all that common heh

    2. Re:alternative medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know that was a joke and the most you get from banana peels is nothing...

    3. Re:alternative medicine by cubic6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you actually read the page you linked to? They drank water with LSD dissolved in it, then smoked the "banana joints". Wonder which one caused the psychadelic experiences?

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
    4. Re:alternative medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty common where I am (Ireland). Murphy, Leary, Byrne...

  18. What are we reviewing here? Book or license? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It is much more than just a drug book though, and what's better, it has been released under a Creative Commons license.

    So if it was crap, it would still be "much better" crap because it's Creative Commons? Or, if it was brilliant, it might not be quite as brilliant, not quite as good if it where not under Creative Commons? What does the quality of the read have to do with the licensing?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:What are we reviewing here? Book or license? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well, because you can now read it and say, "hey this sucks. But just barely. If i were to change this part and this part... add a giant robot here, it would actually be a really good story." Then rewrite those parts, keeping all the rest original, rename it, and not be sued for plagerism or anything else.

      or i could just say "...and what's better" is a common phrase also meaning "hey, there's more value here that you might not have noticed". /. has to stop taking everything so literally

    2. Re:What are we reviewing here? Book or license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      how is this insightful.

      he thinks the book is very good. and also as an added bonus, its under the Creative Commons license.

      how you managed to screw that up i dont know.

    3. Re:What are we reviewing here? Book or license? by haakoneide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would a failed collision-test on a car make driving it less fun? No, but it's still an even better car if it has airbags.

    4. Re:What are we reviewing here? Book or license? by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but it's hairsplitting... an example of geekily excessive literalism.

      "A pretty good apple pie. Even better, it's free!"

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  19. Ob. video link by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    British troops testing LSD - 14mb video, but essential viewing for those considering mixing hallucinogens with the workplace

    --
    "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    1. Re:Ob. video link by Coupons · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...for those considering mixing hallucinogens with the workplace...

      Rumor spread around the ship that we were going to be hit with a locker inspection. I rumaged and found an old tab of acid under some socks. Didn't think it would be any good after six months, so I ate it, put on my dress blues and headed topside for my quarterdeck watch. Took about half an hour to add three lines to the log. The Officer of the Deck looked at me kinda funny, but I didn't get too paranoid and it never crossed my mind to use my loaded .45 on him. All in all it was pretty mellow, but I wouldn't recommend it.

      --
      If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it? ~ Albert Einstein
  20. How about some non-fiction, from the source? by BadDoggie · · Score: 5, Informative
    Try Albert Hofmann's own book, LSD - My Problem Child, which has been available on the Web -- for free -- for about a decade already. It's also available here as a single text file.

    Much more interesting, exciting and enlightening.

    1. Re:How about some non-fiction, from the source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good book.

  21. LSD advertisement? by InternationalCow · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From how I read the review I got the impression that this book sorta glorifies the use of hallucinogenic drugs. Well, they have interesting effects but troubling side effects, such as the infamous LSD flashback. The latter outweigh the former, believe me. If you're interested in what it's REALLY like, go and read Burroughs' Naked Lunch. That should cure ya :)

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    1. Re:LSD advertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, that would be a reason to avoid HEROIN and BAD WRITING. Nothing/very little to do with acid.

    2. Re:LSD advertisement? by Master+Bait · · Score: 1
      Drugs aren't bad. Drugs are fun. Fun is bad.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    3. Re:LSD advertisement? by Marshall+Banana,+Esq · · Score: 0

      Drink your school, stay in drugs, don't do milk! /Mr. T http://www.no-cash.org/mrt/videos.htm

    4. Re:LSD advertisement? by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      When I met my now-wife at a rave in london, she was wearing a t-shirt that said on the front:

      "I tried to say no to drugs but they just wouldn't listen" :P

    5. Re:LSD advertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, the acid flashback. also known as post traumatic stress disorder.

    6. Re:LSD advertisement? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Being utterly drunk and puking all over yourself after 30 cans of beer sounds worse to me, i cant think my way out of a drunkenstate, but i can think my way out of a bad trip to a good trip, and flashbacks? where.... urban ledgend or just 4 second memories?

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    7. Re:LSD advertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and lots of GAY SEX!

    8. Re:LSD advertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mechanism by which LSD flashbacks occur is understood to be the same by which all other flashbacks occur.

      Any sufficiently traumatic event (such as a car crash or a really bad LSD trip) can assume significance in the memory of the person who experienced it. Because of this significance, combined with possible consciouss repression of the memory, the person involved can experience flashbacks to the event set off by some kind of 'reminder' that they come across in every day life. The mechanism does not distinguish between a sober traumatic event and a dosed traumatic event.

      This is important because it means that LSD flashbacks are not fundamentally different to any other flashback. They are certainly not due to 'LSD being stored in the spine' that is then released at random intervals latter in life, or due to any serious physiological alteration of the brain. Unless you have a seriously bad trip you are unlikely to experience any kind of debilitating flashback.

      That's not to say that all 'flashbacks' are bad. I have experienced 'reminders' of trips i have previously taken. Looking up at the right kind of tree on a sunny day will remind me of a previous enjoyable LSD trip i may have experience. For a brief period of time i can recapture mentally some of the enjoyable and pleasant thoughts and feelings that occurred under the influence. These reminders are entirely pleasant and non-debilitating, and again, no different to being reminded of a trip to Disneyland (say) after watching mickey mouse on the TV.

      If you were to believe all the government propaganda then you would suspect that after dosing on LSD one time you would be subjected to random and serious flashbacks at random intervals latter in life. Before i educated myself i imagine i might be skiing down a hill only to have some random LSD inspired vision and ski uncontrollably off a cliff or something. This was my only reason for not taking LSD, and when i discovered the truth...

    9. Re:LSD advertisement? by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      "Flashbacks" are nothing more than a psycological condition in which you are reminded of a certain perspective or frame of reference that you previously only remember from (though not neccesarily exclusive to) a hallucinogenic experience.

      I've done, shit, I can't even count how much....150, 180 hits of acid? (all of various degrees of quality and consistency) I relish every single flashback that I get. Not only is it a 'freebie', but given the moments that they occur (for me), usually is at just the right time and place to give me the 'perspective check' that I so desperately need (at the moment).

      I'm quite sick of hearing about 'flashbacks' as if it were some physical condition that only LSD could bring on...cuz it just ain't true. I've had flashbacks from strong coffee, traumatic events, acid trips, mdma use, or even just 'deja vu'.... it's not a physical condition, the LSD does not crystalize and reside in your spine, and it is not a "poison, so that's why you trip".

      Granted, my anecdotal evidence is just as anecdotal as all other evidence you may have. But, as an experienced (and thoughtful) psychonaut, I have done my fair share of research prior to and after the fact. All of which has led me to the conclusion that trying to detail, catalog, and timeline an LSD trip--much like your own sober perceptions of the world--are futile, given the subjective nature of result.

      I have plenty of flashbacks....and they are all wonderful.



      To everybody all hopped up about these flashbacks: Enjoy the ride, or get in control of your mind

    10. Re:LSD advertisement? by spiralx · · Score: 1
      I've probably done at least as much as you over the last 10 years or so and still drop regularly. Can't say I've ever had more than mild tracers at rare points over the years. Pity really ;)

      But then again I have a healthy attitude to taking LSD and I can't say that it would be in anyway worrying. As you say, free drugs ;)

    11. Re:LSD advertisement? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Flashbacks are a boogieman. Naked Lunch has nothing in particular to do with LSD. Thanks for playing.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  22. What a shame... by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that Albert Hoffman is remembered only for LSD.

    Fact is, he created the first nootropic (cognitive enhancing) drug, hydergine, and deserves far more recognition for that than for LSD, or any of the other drugs of far more utility that he created.

    The fact that he's not recognized for this only indicates that most people would rather be stoned than smart. That's a damn shame for him, and shame on them.

    Oh, and shame on the US for not approving hydergine for use. It's one of the safest drugs there is, and useful to most anyone. Unfortunately, like many good drugs, the patents are owned by non-US companies, so no US company stands to profit, and so the FDA doesn't approve it. If it were the case that nootropics weren't useful, then Nobel laureate Eric Kandel wouldn't have announced devoting the remainder of his career to creating them.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:What a shame... by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, how about a few links on hydergine, and nootropics in general?

    2. Re:What a shame... by Grond · · Score: 3, Informative
      Oh, and shame on the US for not approving hydergine for use. It's one of the safest drugs there is, and useful to most anyone. Unfortunately, like many good drugs, the patents are owned by non-US companies, so no US company stands to profit, and so the FDA doesn't approve it. If it were the case that nootropics weren't useful, then Nobel laureate Eric Kandel wouldn't have announced devoting the remainder of his career to creating them.


      I don't know if you're misinformed or just didn't check your sources (I would certainly hesitate to claim that you're lying outright), but hydergine is most defninitely approved for use in the US. Furthermore, while the company that makes it (Novartis) is primarily a Swiss company born out of the merger of Ciba and Sandoz (the company Hoffman was working for), I imagine any patents they had on the stuff have long since run out as it was discovered in the late 1940s.

      My sources:
      FDA approval
      Discovery date
    3. Re:What a shame... by davidkv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First of all Albert Hoffman is - as far as I know - alive and well. He's almost 100 years old now. Really.

      Second, I think LSD has been much more influential to the world than hydergine has, or problably ever will.

      Utility or not is mostly in the eye of the beholder. LSD certainly has a good way of showing you that. It has quite little to do with being "stoned".

      Other than that, I sort of agree with you.

    4. Re:What a shame... by zatz · · Score: 1

      Sub-threshold doses of LSD have similar effects to hydergine. Maybe Hoffman just went looking for a drug with similar effects but no potential for "abuse".

      If it were the case that nootropics weren't useful, then Nobel laureate Eric Kandel wouldn't have announced devoting the remainder of his career to creating them.

      Consider Linus Pauling and his theories about the use of "megadoses" of vitamin C. Just cause someone has a Nobel prize....

      --

      Java: the COBOL of the new millenium.
    5. Re:What a shame... by SINEtist · · Score: 1

      "...but hydergine is most definitely approved for use in the US...."

      Yes, but not for cognitive enhancement. It is FDA approved for certain psychological conditions. It is legal to import it in 3 month supplies from other countries. I have tried it in small doses over a period of months. I did this only after intensive web research :) I would have to say from experience that I believe it does work as a cognitive enhancer. I quit using it though, because I also felt an elevated level of stress. This makes sense to me though, because from what I've read in articles, and observed in people, smarter individuals experience more stress than those with less intelligence. One other positive effect of the Hydergine (which I also used with small doses of Piracetam as a synergistic combo) was increased reflexes. Of course, it could all be a matter of perception. Those are the effects I felt though.

    6. Re:What a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Pauling lived to be a very old man. And his spark was evident to his death. Not sure why you believe his daily vitamin C intake might not have had a positive effect on life.

    7. Re:What a shame... by MrIcee · · Score: 1
      Having done both LSD and hydergine in my lifetime, I can say that yes, he will be remembered at least by me for both. Both are wonderful drugs though certainly, LSD has a more vivid impact (but hydergine is certainly a brain opener too... no arguements there).

      And yes about the US and it's drug policy, but what did you expect from a country so stupid as to vote Bush into office.

      You might be pleased to know that those of us who honor him have indeed worked around the stupidity of american politics... our own contribution can be found at tranquility - which most people say makes them very happy / stoned / better.

    8. Re:What a shame... by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      Grond sez: I don't know if you're misinformed or just didn't check your sources (I would certainly hesitate to claim that you're lying outright), but hydergine is most defninitely approved for use in the US."

      For late stage dementias, where it does little good. In fact it may only serve to make the patient able to be aware of their cognitive decline. Consider the ending of "Flowers for Algernon" (the movie "Charlie"). Would you want to prolong your awareness of losing your mind?

      As a general use nootropic, it is most certainly not approved in the US. Users here typically have to order it from Europe via the 1989 AIDS Drug Law rules, IF they can find someone here to prescribe it.

      The greatest complaint against it? It can lower blood pressure. High blood pressure is far more common a problem that low, so it's safe for far more than not. People with normal blood pressure have nothing to fear. Besides, if something that lowered blood pressure were really a public health problem, you wouldn't find Rogaine for sale; it was originally to lower blood pressure, and the hair growtrh was a side effect. Just because it's used for that effect doesn't mean the other has disappeared.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    9. Re:What a shame... by mikeophile · · Score: 1
      I wish I could provide a reference, but I remember Dr. Hoffman was quoted talking about hydergine and how similar it was to LSD.

      In fact, he said that a low daily dose of LSD (30-50 micrograms) would have the same cognitive enhancing effects as hydergine itself.

      So, really LSD was the first synthetic nootropic drug, but hydergine was more marketable since it didn't have the stigmata LSD accquired.

  23. Drugs are bad mmmmmmmkay by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Don't do drugs kids. There is a time and place for everything. It's called college. - Chef

    /ob

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Drugs are bad mmmmmmmkay by maximilln · · Score: 1

      More "I wannabe your mentor" drivel.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  24. Could never happen today by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    since the war on drugs eliminated drugs.

  25. Good reading by WwWonka · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...this is a novel which deals in part with the synthesis of and culture surrounding LSD.

    Does the authors special edition version have perforated lickable pages?

    1. Re:Good reading by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      Does the authors special edition version have perforated lickable pages?

      No, but I recommend you check out your local post office.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  26. PDF Version by siliconjunkie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I made a quick and dirty PDF (with the cover art) for those of you who aren't into reading flat text files (i prefer PDF's myself).

    http://www3.telus.net/public/gsell/ly/

    1. Re:PDF Version by siliconjunkie · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:PDF Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in God's name would you like PDF better? I can't think of a single benefit, but I can think of a metric fuckload of disadvantages of PDF to.. just about anything.

  27. Reality is absolute by genner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sadly reality isn't an agreement, it's a absolute. A man may think he can fly while on drugs but his perceptions won't keep him alive if he jumps off a building.

    1. Re:Reality is absolute by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Naw, that's only true in our shared experiences.

      Reality is by definition subjective. You know it through the sum of your experiences.

    2. Re:Reality is absolute by genner · · Score: 1
      Reality is by defintion not subjective.

      See websters definition

      ". The state or quality of being real; actual being or existence of anything, in distinction from mere appearance; fact."

      Websters Link

      Reality is seperate from appearnce and hence it is not subjective.

    3. Re:Reality is absolute by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Try tripping: you'll learn the distinction between reality and perception pretty fast. While we might call existence, independent of our perception, "objective" and "absolute", that's all theoretical, while all we actually have is our subjective, though largely consistent and consensual, perception. LSD makes this as plain as fog on a window makes it plain you're inside, where there's lots of fun to be had with the lights, stereo, toys and other playmates.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Reality is absolute by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      "You know it through the sum of your experiences."

      That is not that same as it being equivalent to the sum of your experiences.

    5. Re:Reality is absolute by John+Courtland · · Score: 2, Funny

      Welcome to philosophy. Prove anything is real and you win a cookie.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    6. Re:Reality is absolute by nomel · · Score: 1

      "LSD makes this as plain as fog on a window makes it plain you're inside,"

      how do you know if you're on the inside, or outside?

    7. Re:Reality is absolute by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      If it smells more like you than like everything else, you're probably inside. Or maybe you're imagining it. Or maybe you're the window, imagining you're a human fogging you up. Maybe the fog is the only objective reality - lick it and see.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Reality is absolute by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Reality is an absolute, our perception of reality is not.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    9. Re:Reality is absolute by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 3, Funny

      A real cookie?

    10. Re:Reality is absolute by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      If you check the definition of "fact" it refers to the definition of "reality"

      It's actually kind of fun to click through webser's links.

      Another way to put it would be to say that to believe in an objective reality means at some point you have to take a leap of faith that your senses and mind haven't deceived you. That doesn't make it any less subjective, it just plays with the definitions so that your senses and mind can create a word and concept of "objectiveness." You could say that I'm just playing with definitions, which might be "true", but really I'm just trying to say that nobody should take for granted the objectiveness of their reality.

  28. Glad to see you've been indoctrinated by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    with the same ol' propogandist bullshit they've been spewing since the beginning of the War on (some) Drugs. Your brainwashing is now complete, you can move on.

    1. Re:Glad to see you've been indoctrinated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wouldn't it make more sense to give the children the breakfast cereal?

  29. Highly recommended by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

    Although I have not read those books, I would highly recommend Erowid as an amazing resource for all kinds of information. Anything from chemistry, to religion/psychology, to laws and culture surrounding various substances. Seriously, even if you have the slightest curosity (don't we all?) then check it out. I used to keep a printed out copy of one of Erowid's FAQ's (*very* good I might add) on my coffeetable while living in my fraternity house and still in college. It was amazing the wide range of people who read and found it interesting, most of them had zero experience with those substances asides from the general fallacies.

    That being said, please be responsible with whatever activities to choose to partake in.

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  30. Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I find it interesting that a drug related article made it to slashdot. I spend a lot of time in psychedelic news forums. I've consumed my fair share of LSD as well. Sometimes I just assume that slashdot readers have similar interests, but then I think that is a silly assumption. Was my original assumption correct? Are most slashdot readers (geeks?) at least sympathetic to psychedelic/cannabis culture? If so, why do you think this is?

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    1. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being highly allergic to marijuana, not me.

      However the geek crowd I know does have what seems a higher than usual number of hallucinogenic drug users. Plenty who'd never touch the stuff too, but I think you get those types anywhere you go.

    2. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 0

      Being highly allergic to marijuana, not me.

      That's interesting considering it's physically impossible to be allergic to marijuana

      I suggest you've had a spiked joint

      --
      RST
    3. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by haakoneide · · Score: 1

      I agree, you *have* consumed your fair share of LSD.

    4. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by dporowski · · Score: 5, Funny

      Speaking as a slashdot reader, geek, and one who may have been known to--purely hypothetically speaking, of course--indulge in an occasional bit of recreational chemistry... (Though violently allergic to cannabis, it seems.)

      Cannabis "culture" can f*ck right off. So can "psychedelic culture".

      Feel free to use them. Some of it's REALLY fun. A lot. Repeatedly. I approve. (Assuming one is aware of the potential risks, etc.)

      However, "psychedelic music" makes me itch, patchouli makes me gag, if I never see a dirty set of half-assed dreads on a white suburban boy again I'll be ecstatic, candy-ravers should have their own hunting season, and drum circles make me wish I owned a HMV so I could re-enact that line from Conan where he says "Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women." Vroom.

      Sorry. I find it indefensible. It's as if I tried to create "beer culture" or "vodka culture" or maybe "swiss cheese culture" and pass it off as a valid lifestyle choice. Not to mention it spoils it for everyone who may want to try the substance in question but just can't stand the people who DO it.

      Treat it like having a beer after work, y'know? Don't call it a "lifestyle" or a "culture" and then proceed to fail your hygiene check. I'm all down with being able to ingest whatever makes you happy. Have fun, just make sure to get the good stuff.

      (And stop HUGGING ME! STOP! BAD TOUCH!)

    5. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1

      What is that supposed to mean? Are you expressing some kind of prejudice against psychedelic drug users?

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    6. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never understood the big deal about pot. In my opinion, it's like the "twinkie" of drugs. Devoid of much usefulness for most unless you have some weird type of Dorito-scurvy. People say pot can be a muse. Most of the people that I know that use it turn into boring zombies. Alcohol is another generally counterproductive drug.

      On the other hand, LSD, Cocaine, X and that family are a different story. They seem a lot more proactive and useful if they're not abused. When I was much younger I'd have massive opiate-induced sessions of productivity. It's nothing short of amazing how something like coke can make you very single-minded and focused and capable of getting a lot done in a very short period of time. It's no surprise that many of today's anti-ADD/depression drugs are opiate-based and basically do the same thing in slightly different, less-intense doses.

      These days, I don't do any of that, but I'd be lying if I said some of these now-"evil" substances can't be employed in controlled circumstances for great usefulness.

    7. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1

      Well, rest assured that I don't have dreads. What I meant by culture was simply internet forums. I really don't engage in much psychedelic "culture" in real life beyond doing the drugs from time to time... mostly at home with my wife. ;-)

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    8. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by dporowski · · Score: 1

      Don't misunderstand. Dreads, in and of themselves, are not a bad thing. When done right, that is.

      As for the internet thing... There's two kinds. There's the kind that just presents info on the things, and says "Here's this, and here's this, and they do this and this, and you'll want to do thus and so to not die."

      Then there's the tie-dyed flashing homages to Jerry Garcia proclaiming that drugs are the answer to EVERYTHING, and why don't we love each other, man...?

      The former is an encyclopedia. The latter should be burned.

      Hopefully, I'm being clear about the difference.

    9. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coke? an opiate? eh? what are you talking about?

    10. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What a crock of flamebait.

      Just because you don't like a particular culture does not mean it is bad or dumb. Funny how geeks get so defensive when people criticize their culture but are so quick to assault others.

      Now, I personally don't enjoy "hippy music" or white boy rasta posers either. And having been a raver for some time, I get equally frustrated with the "e-puddles" that form on the middle of the dancefloor.

      However, that in no way gives me the right to pass judgement on them.

      They made their decisions, they are enjoying them, and that is what is important.

      Don't put others down just because you don't believe in the same things they do or don't like something they do. Different strokes for different folks.

      P.S.
      You insensitive clod.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    11. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Informative


      That's interesting considering it's physically impossible to be allergic to marijuana

      Why is it impossible? Allergies are not caused by ANY danger in the allergen itself. Allergies are caused by your own body's immune system falsely labeling a particular thing as being dangerous when it really isn't. All the symptoms of an allergy are the same as the symptoms of a cold or flu bug - extra mucus production, coughing, raised temperatures, nausea, swelling etc - are all actually being caused by your OWN body. Those reactions are ways you fight off the foreign intruder. Your body chooses to raise the temperature, because your body is better able to survive the ordeal of being too hot than a lot of foriegn microbes are. Your body chooses to produce extra mucus, to trap the microbes at the source and keep them from passing into the lungs. Your body initiates nausea to try to expell the bad microbes from your stomach. etc, etc etc. All an allergy is, is your own body choosing to kick in those reactions in response to something that wasn't actually a threat after all, but it has a bad pattern-recognition that has "learned" incorrectly that a particular thing is bad for you, and that mistake is now stuck in your system and it won't undo it.

      So, sure, someone could be allergic to marijuana. People can be allergic to just about *anything* that enters the body through the air. Anything that gives off fumes, dust, or particles. This says nothing about the danger of the actual thing in question - just about the relative stupidity of the human immune system.

      The reason it's so hard to find ways to cure an allergy is that the cure is to alter your immune system, telling it, "Please cross off Foo from your list of big bad dangerous things you like to fight against. It was added by mistake." And we haven't found a way to do that without also crossing off *other* things from that list - things that it would be dangerous to cross off, like "the common cold".

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    12. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by monk · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I find it indefensible. It's as if I tried to create "beer culture" or "vodka culture" or maybe "swiss cheese culture" and pass it off

      Interesting that in each case you chose a product of of decomposing organisms. You can make alot of money off of a good swiss cheese culture. ;)

      Please sign me up for the "Beer Culture" though. Do we get to wear hats?

      --
      [-- Trust the Monkey --]
    13. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Opiates are drugs derived from poppies. Like opium. Cocaine's derived from the coca plant. It's a stimulant, not a narcotic like opiates are. ADD medication is also a stimulant, it has more in common with amphetamines than it does opiates.

    14. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by dporowski · · Score: 1

      ----
      What a crock of flamebait.
      ----

      And? Fluffy-bunny-land is somewhere over ======>there.

      ----
      Just because you don't like a particular culture does not mean it is bad or dumb. Funny how geeks get so defensive when people criticize their culture but are so quick to assault others.
      ----

      Geek culture?

      What, penicillin?

      I disapprove of "geek culture" as much as I do the preceding. Otherwise, I wouldn't wander conventions, etc, handing out flyers reading "Got Soap?" Stinky bastards. Why would I want to culturally identify with a bunch of people--largely male--who could in any way be associated with the phrase "I've never touched a woman before..."(Please see "Booth Babes" article a while back for reference. Drive on.) Let ALONE defend such a thing.

      ----
      Now, I personally don't enjoy "hippy music" or white boy rasta posers either. And having been a raver for some time, I get equally frustrated with the "e-puddles" that form on the middle of the dancefloor.
      ----

      I wouldn't have said "frustrated". Unless "frustration" involves "feeding their pikachu backpacks down their oversized pants", that is. Then I'm all down.

      ----
      However, that in no way gives me the right to pass judgement on them.
      ----

      Yes it does. We all pass judgment every day. On everything.

      And I'm judging them to be freaky little buggers with unsavory personal habits and hygiene issues. Same with the stoners covered in tiedye and blacklight paint. Ew. Stinky.

      I have the right to do so because y'know what? I'm not stinky.

      ----
      They made their decisions, they are enjoying them, and that is what is important.
      ----

      Not to me. I'm glad they're happy with themselves, but I fail to see the impact of this on me.

      ----
      Don't put others down just because you don't believe in the same things they do or don't like something they do. Different strokes for different folks.
      ----

      No, I'm putting them down due to lack of personal hygiene, obnoxious noisy habits, inability to logically process information, and general annnoyannce factor. What they like or believe has no bearing on my reasoning.

      ----
      P.S.
      You insensitive clod.
      ----

      Proudly representing ClodCo(tm) on the internet since 1993! (Or so. Maybe. I forget.)

    15. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, for me, UNIX never made more sense than when I was on LSD.

    16. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I wouldn't describe myself as "allergic" as such, I know that I get vivid and nasty hallucinations where others just get mellow and hungry. But I can munch huge doses of LSD and just giggle where others would be turned psychotic. Fucking bay leaves make me hallucinate. I just have some anomalous brain chemistry going on, I guess.

    17. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by shostiru · · Score: 2, Informative
      There's more than one "drug culture". You and I may associate (or refuse to associate) with different crowds of stoners and psychedelic enthusiasts. Although there are exceptions, those I spend time with tend to be:
      • Intelligent and able to think logically and speak coherently. Obviously, this doesn't apply while intoxicated, but then I'm sure even Nobel Prize winners can turn into idiots when they're overindulged, and none of us have won a Nobel Prize yet.
      • Clean and well-groomed. Backwoods camping doesn't count (I'd like to see how you look after a few days in the woods), and I think one really ought to make allowances for festivals where shower facilities are limited or nonexistent (e.g., Burning Man. It's a fucking waste of water. Baby wipes only go so far in a dust storm).
      • Diverse in musical taste. Which can make for some long arguments when trying to choose trip music.

      But then, I tend to associate with people who view drugs as tools, means to an end rather than an end itself. Sometimes that end is fun, sometimes it's self-exploration, sometimes spirituality, sometimes social lubrication, but rarely is it just to be high or satisfy a craving (that's what caffeine is for dammit!)

      OK, so the drumming thing is true ... but have you ever been around a drum circle where the drummers actually know what they're doing? I've been to several (not as a drummer, I'm not that good!). Babatunde used to teach at my favorite summer festival and that made a huge difference. Drum circles are like any other team: experience matters.

      Oh, and I don't really do MDMA (didn't like it much ... left me dysphoric) so I don't see much of the random stranger hugging.

    18. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not to me. I'm glad they're happy with themselves, but I fail to see the impact of this on me.

      Well i'm sorry you don't like hippies, but I fail to see the impact of this on me.

      No, I'm putting them down due to lack of personal hygiene, obnoxious noisy habits, inability to logically process information, and general annnoyannce factor. What they like or believe has no bearing on my reasoning.

      I go to jam festivals, dead shows, etc, have long hair, and smoke lots of pot. That makes me part of this "drug culture" you so despise, right? So I must be a loud mangy and stupid hippy right?

      Well, no. I showered this morning, my hair is straight, I'm rather quiet and am persuing a Ph.D. in pharmacology. What was your point again?

    19. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1

      You're clear in that you have a huge chip on your shoulder. Were you severely beaten by hippies when yoiu were younger or something? ;-)

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    20. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, LSD, Cocaine, X and that family are a different story. They seem a lot more proactive and useful if they're not abused.

      Cocaine? Are you joking? Coke has to be one of the biggest waste of time drugs ever "invented." It doesn't last long enough to be "useful." And it is very difficult not to abuse.

      Amphetamines, maybe... but not coke.

      Of course, you seem to have a much different idea of what is useful. I can "get stuff done" without drugs. I'm much more interested in the spritual and creative aspects of drugs. Pot, LSD, and X can be very good in that regard. The thing with pot is that you can't get in the habit of sitting around watching TV stoned. Get out and do something when stoned and it becomes a much more productive and interesting.

      On the other hand, LSD, Cocaine, X and that family are a different story.... It's no surprise that many of today's anti-ADD/depression drugs are opiate-based and basically do the same thing in slightly different, less-intense doses.

      Huh? Name one ADD medication that is opiate based. Most of them are amphetamine (speed) based. Perhaps you are confused as to what an opiate is. Herion is an opiate, for example. Coke is not even close. Somehow I doubt you had opiate sessions of productivity. :-P

      They seem a lot more proactive and useful if they're not abused.

      You have a pretty odd definition of "useful." You're not very spiritual, are you?

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    21. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Funny

      That you're still a dirty, filthy hippie?

      It goes down past skin deep, my friend. You can't shower off your patchouli-stink.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    22. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      There's a way to find out. It's called the "Slashdot Poll".

    23. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me think of the "Harley Davidson culture" that I so despise!

      On the other hand, this need for "culture" can be viewed as a weakness, and as my friend Brian said.."Everything has a purpose... weaknesses are to be exploited".

    24. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by spiralx · · Score: 1
      Best comment EVER. I love all kinds of drugs but "hippies" piss me off, especially the trustafarian types. Gah.

      However I've found a great way to piss them off it to start snorting fat lines of ketamine. For some reason they just don't like it ;)

    25. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1

      It goes down past skin deep, my friend. You can't shower off your patchouli-stink.

      Ah, so in fact it doesn't have anything to do with how these "hippies" actual are in reality, but everything to do with how you project your own self-hatred onto them. Fact is that most of these people you are judging are really good and kind.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    26. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Having lived with more than a couple of hippies, I can honestly say the following:

      Most of them are good and kind. And smelly. God, are they smelly.

      (Look, there's nothing wrong with them, really, but you have to allow the rest of us to make fun of them - they smell like patchouli, for chrissake!)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    27. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1

      Whatever. Seems pretty childish to make fun of a group's prefered fragrance. Apparently your criticism of hippies is skin deep.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    28. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      OF COURSE my criticism of hippies is skin deep. It's making fun of them, its joking, there's no depth to it because IT ISN'T FUCKING IMPORTANT. It's just talking shit because I can. You know, like normal people with social lives and social skills do?

      No offense, but you are never, ever going to have sex if you don't remove the gigantic LOG you have jammed up your ass.

      IT'S A FUCKING INTERNET MESSAGE BOARD.

      IT'S A FUCKING JOKE.

      FUCKING RELAX.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    29. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1

      Hey, you're the one typing in all caps, not me.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    30. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      You're the one who can't take a joke. And, being that you're a hippie, I figured I might need some extra emphasis to get it through the layers of dirt over your eardrums.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    31. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by misleb · · Score: 1

      Uh, ya, I'm a hippie. Ok. I think we're done here. Go along and play now.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    32. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Let me know when you make some friends. I'll give you a hint - it helps if you stop taking offense at everything anyone says.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    33. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh some of them do

  31. The obvious by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

    Is there a way to print it on blotting paper?

    Sheesh that should have been one of the first comments. Stupid slashdot. And I don't even do drugs. Just sweet, sweet beer.

    1. Re:The obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and alcohol (killing millions yearly) is not a drug. And caffeine is not a drug. Nor aspirin.

      The term "drug" is overloaded. Needs specification.

      Is it legal by U.S. law?

      Is it dangerous?
      - OD chance
      - impaired judgement
      - addiction chance

      Is it habit-forming?

      You'll find that many legal drugs are dangerous drugs, and many illegal drugs are not.

      Don't let the term overloading enable your muddleheadedness.

      (Millions is an off-the-cuff estimate.)

    2. Re:The obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit its pretty obvious the guy was makin fun of his own drinking sweet sweet beer (Simpsons ref hello?) as opposed to just a beer every once in a while.

    3. Re:The obvious by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      Speaking of, check out this blotter art

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  32. fearful anti-drug culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am of the belief that what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger. Life is full of things to experience and I'd imagine that everyone has at least one painful, scary or politically-incorrect experience in their past that taught them a valuable lesson they continue to apply.

    I'm not condoning LSD or any drugs. For every politically-incorrect drug like pot or LSD, there are a hundred others like Vicodin or Oxycotin which are potentially even more dangerous and addictive, yet are doled out like they are candy by many in the industry.

    IMO, all drugs are basically used to alter reality whether we want to admit it or not. Pot is ultimately used as a (psychological) "painkiller" not unlike how you might get a Demerol drip (as a physical painkiller) before a surgery, albeit the circumstances vary, the main objective is not dissimilar if you look at things figuratively. The value in using these substances is exclusively based on employing moderation and responsibility. I believe every drug has an equal potential for positive or negative consequences. LSD can make people more intelligent by unlocking areas of their brain that were previously inaccessible; alcohol can loosen peoples inhibitions and allow them to be more comfortable and relaxed; painkillers and muscle relaxers have beneficial uses -- it all depends upon how *responsible* one is in using these tools. But to completely condemn one group, while promoting another seems hypocritical to me. But at the same time, I also acknowledge that our society is becoming progressively more obsessive-compulsive and unable to moderate their consumption, so it's a real dilemma how to deal with the abuse potential.

    Where things get scary IMO isn't over which drugs are good or bad. ANYTHING can be abused and destructive if not used responsibly and in moderation, whether we're talking about alcohol or oxygen. You could just as easily make yourself hallucinate by hyperventilating. But what seems scary to me is this fearful anti-drug culture which downplays the significance of responsibility in favor of making people intensely fearful of even the singular prospect of trying some politically-incorrect substance. This results in a sociological change in the last ten years where there is an almost total absence of healthy debate on the issues and the elimination of a substantive moderate/responsible-user/exerimenter demographic: people tend to be one extreme or the other: those who have never tried drugs and authoritatively claim they're evil and suicidal, or those that exercise virtually no responsibility in using them and are poster children for self destruction and lack of moderation.

    In the mean time, as a result of this immoveable, hyper-puritanical polarization of drug use, we miss the opportunity to discover wisdom and insight that we could reap great benefit from.

    1. Re:fearful anti-drug culture by ElectricPoppy · · Score: 1
      "Doled out like they are candy by many in the industry"

      Yeah right. I wish.

    2. Re:fearful anti-drug culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's really no way one can justify lumping hallucinogens and painkillers together, there's almost no similarity except that they alter consciousness. My opinion is that painkillers are so dangerous because they are so predicatble. You know almost exactly how you will feel if you know the name of the chemical, pain-free. On the other hand, psychedelics (and marijuana to some extent) are almost completely unreliable, an almost seemingly insignificant change in environment can completely change the experience. You can never be sure if you'll be pain-free with psychedelics, quite the opposite can happen! One will mask your emotions, the other will enhance (extremely) them.

  33. Fear of mind altering drugs. by Mateito · · Score: 1

    I don't do drugs. In general, they don't interest me. Sure, during my university years I drank like a fish and still enjoy a bottle of wine or a few beers... and yeah... even the odd blinder now and then. I've never done any hard drugs (I don't count the odd joint as a hard drug, and anyway... pot gives me an hour of giggles then three of headaches and paranoia).

    But Acid has always struck me as something interesting. Something I'd like to try.

    So, for the newbie, what's your advice?

    - How do I ensure I'm getting the real thing?
    - What enviroment, music, people etc etc should I be in/with/etc.
    - If things go bad, what can others do to help me through it?
    - Any other pointers?

    1. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - How do I ensure I'm getting the real thing?
      - What enviroment, music, people etc etc should I be in/with/etc.
      - If things go bad, what can others do to help me through it?
      - Any other pointers?


      It's been more than a decade since I did acid. I think the answer to all of your questions have to do with one concept: "trust"

      Find someone you trust who can get what you need. Surround yourself with an environment that is comfortable; surround yourself with friends whom you trust. The notion that things will often go "bad" is blown way out of preportion if you experiment in a responsible, friendly environment.

      When I was younger, a bunch of us dropped some acid and sat around listening to music. You don't need any special environment - that can actually be worse. If you get some clean LSD, you can be immensely entertained simply staring at the wall. This is what's so illuminating about the experience. Just have a "designated driver" that is coherent that you can trust to keep an eye on you and your friends, and have fun. I think everyone should try it once. But don't overdo it; it's only really special the first few times, then it's not the same.

    2. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by simetra · · Score: 2, Interesting
      - How do I ensure I'm getting the real thing?

      Short of watching them cook it in the lab, you don't know until you've eaten it. many times you just get strychnine. I believe LSD decays into strychnine too. If you get cramps, that's why.


      - What enviroment, music, people etc etc should I be in/with/etc.

      Something low-stress, relaxing, or whatever makes you happy. Whatever makes you happy now though won't necessarily make you happy on your trip.



      - If things go bad, what can others do to help me through it?

      Distract you, take your mind off of whatever's bugging you. The worst trips have nothing to do with scary visions, but more about warped thought-loops.


      - Any other pointers?

      Get a bottle of red wine, start drinking it right after you take the acid. It'll take the edge off and help you relax. Also, you can drink a lot while on acid. It's like it burns off the alcohol.

      Watch something funny. Silly stuff is insanely funny on acid. Weekend At Bernies, which I would normally never watch, totally had me crying when I watched it on acid. Letterman is hilarious on acid.

      You can take it alone if you're strong and don't rely on social interaction a lot in your life. Being an anti-social person to begin with, when I used to take it, I would do so alone most of the time. But if you're a little bunny-foo-foo who requires constant social reinforcement/validation, you may need to be with people so you don't freak out.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    3. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by ktulu1115 · · Score: 4, Informative

      All of your questions (and more) can be answered right here. But I'll answer these ones directly:

      -Getting the real thing? Only an issue if you choose to do shrooms, potency varies *greatly* between patches. LSD is always returns consistant results. On the other hand, the fungus gets you about 6 hours total, while acid is 12.

      -Music/environment/people? Tough one. Complex subject. I personally like the following: Pink Floyd/outside in the woods (no one else around plus nature is a great setting)/1-2 other people max who are tripping with me as well

      -Things going bad? Always remember you have complete control of the situation. At times you might lose yourself (you will if it's a good/strong enough trip) but keep in mind you can change the way the trip is going at any time. If you feel funny and don't like something almost guaranteed one of three things will change it: Change the music, change the lighting, or go to the bathroom.

      Since you mentioned you have smoked before, I highly recommend doing so right after popping whatever substance you choose. It will make the voyage from reality much smoother and not quite as abrupt. It sorta smacks you hard and fast if you do it sober.

      Only other advice I can give is: "relax, don't panic and enjoy it". Try to take your mind off of what you just did after you eat them so you're not thinking about it all the time. I like to take my watch off and if you're out in nature, take a walk somewhere that will last at least 30 mins, preferably an hour (you'll start to feel it definately by then).

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    4. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by xchino · · Score: 1

      - How do I ensure I'm getting the real thing?

      First, only deal with people you trust.
      Second, Read, Read, Read! Read everything you can on the facts and myths of ANY new drug. Find out what the expected experience is and if it's something you think you'd like to partake in. LSD (And psilocybin prodcuing mushrooms)trips can the greatest and most enlightening experience, but it can also be terrifying if you don't take the right precautions.
      - What enviroment, music, people etc etc should I be in/with/etc.

      Make sure you feel good about yourself and who you are. Psychadelics will often give you an objective view about yourself, but sometimes you might fixate on something about yourself or your curent life situation. This can be a good thing, but mentally exhausting, and certainly not recreational. If you see yourself going in that direction and you don't want to, put on some cartoons or a funny show, it will pull your attention away from your current train of thought.

      For the first time, it's best to be around someone you are comforatable with, who is experienced with psychadelics. Stay in a private place and plan on not going anywhere. If possible, have a friend that can drive you where you need to go if you absolutely have to leave. Otherwise, stock up on any supplies beforehand. If you smoke marijuana have a good amount of it onhand, you probably won't feel much like smoking it, but if your trip gets too much for you (your adrenaline will be pumping) the weed can take the edge off. If you smoke cigaretets, be sure to have plenty of those around too.

      - If things go bad, what can others do to help me through it?

      Have a friend you can call, or failing that just jump on irc and look for LSD related channels. Most of these people are kind, caring, and most of all understanding of what you're going through. Also know that it si near impossible to overdose on LSD. The closest thing I can think of is where a few meth heads snorted two lines of the pure powder, thinking it was meth. They went comatose, but I beleive all cam eout of it ok. Of course, what they took was the equivalent to probably an entire "Bible" which is what a book of LSD sheets is called. The LD50 for psychadelic mushrooms is roughly your own body weight, and I think eating anything in the amount of your own body weight would probably kill you. If you think you are going to die, don't worry, you aren't. This is of course assuming the substances you got are legit.

      - Any other pointers?

      Have fun, be safe, act responsibly.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    5. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Take mushrooms first" would be the best pointer, I think, followed by "take it with someone else who has done it before".

      If you hate the mushrooms, at least it's only 3-4 hours, whereas acid can be upwards of 8 hours.

      If you freak out, at least there's someone there to try to calm you down.

    6. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by boudie · · Score: 1

      Get a good pair of headphones and put on The Who's Tommy or The Allman Brothers Live At The Fillmore East.

    7. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      first time I've ever posted anonymously. Damn the police state.

      The most important piece of advice is to do it the first time with someone who's done it before, and someone you trust. This will make a _huge_ difference.

      The next most important thing is set things up beforehand so you will be as comfortable as possible:
      - have plenty of food and water
      - have a comfortable temperature
      - go to a private place where you can control who you're interacting with, and the police won't bother you.
      - don't be around people you don't like
      - avoid anything that's going to make you angry, scared, or just uneasy.

      You don't always notice when you're physically uncomfortable until you're _very_ uncomfortable, so a little planning (and maybe a sober person watching over you) is helpful. For example I've been cold and not noticed it, and wondered why I was shaking. You'll also be very ineffective at changing anything once you're tripping, so you want to have things ready beforehand.

      Later on you might enjoy situations that aren't easy and comfortable, but don't risk that the first time you try it.

      As for what music, what to do, etc., everyone likes different things. I like to wander around, but I also know people who will sit in the same spot for hours looking at things. Have a variety of things you think might be nice available, so when you're tripping you can try them.

      One thing I've noticed is that things that seem "trippy" when you're sober aren't at all when you're tripping. Pretty ordinary things are much more interesting when you're tripping. For visuals, things with a pattern, but not a perfect one, tend to be the best. Wood grain is always good.

      If things go bad, the best thing people can do to help is to make you feel as safe and comfortable as possible. That's why having someone you trust around is important, they will be the best at accomplishing this.

      One last tip:
      While you are tripping, do not talk to anyone that you don't want to know you're tripping. Unplugging the phone is a good idea.
      When you've done it before maybe you can bend this rule, but not the first time.

      There were some other posts that mentioned FAQs, so it would probably be good to check those out too.

      And have fun, it's really an incredible experience.

    8. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The only way to be really sure that you're getting the real thing is to test it in an actual lab; but since it's illegal you should get some from a batch that one of your experienced friends has, shall we say, tested.

      2. You can't go wrong w/ the beatles, yellow submarine or sgt peppers- don't do the white album your first time ;) Also the Beta band is really mellow. I would recommend being with the your closest friends, if they're down. I feel more comfortable if everyone else is also tripping, but you may feel differently. The important thing is to have a very comfortable place to be in w/ soft lighting and lots of entertainment.

      3. You should have someone experienced w/ you who can help keep you calm, if things get too weird for you I've heard that orange juice helps. It would be a good Idea to check out those links listed above for more advice, information never hurts unless it's wrong- so stay off any government sites, those guys are assholes.

    9. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by davidkv · · Score: 2, Informative

      The LSD-Strychnine-thingie is a myth. As long as you go with blotter acid (LSD on a small sheet of paper), you can be quite sure it's not strychnine.

      Here are some links on this:
      Shulgin
      Strychnine in LSD

      Or just go to Erowid and search for Strychnine.

    10. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My first response would be: don't do it. There is so much crap on the street masquerading as LSD (or poorly manufactured LSD), that you are more likely to get ripped off, become ill or go to jail than have a good time. A lot of bogus acid simply doesn't do anything, but often large doses of meth or small doses of strychnine are substituted. Neither will do your stomach any favors.

      It is not a source of enlightment: just another metabolic poison that produces entertaining side effects.

      That being said, if you persist in trying, anyway, then try to find a serious Grateful Dead fan. They'll hook you up.

      Don't plan to drive, work or sleep for twelve hours. Listen to happy music (like the Grateful Dead). Eat beforehand.

      Parks are very nice places for tripping. So is the safety of your own home. (I once tripped in the home of a taxidermist, which is NOT recommended, but very interesting).

      Trip with a friend.

      Happy trails :-)

    11. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by painehope · · Score: 1

      My rule of thumb to having a really cool relaxed trip is the following :
      1) find a few friends that want to trip with you. It is best if they're not aggro people ( I can deal with driving around town, going to clubs, and dealing w/ people, even psychotic friends who are trying to rip phone booths loose, but you might not want to ) and they're not neurotic, stressful types ( nothing like having to deal w/ some stupid neurotic girl who keeps asking you if she'll ever come down ).
      2) find a nice safe comfortable place, I recommend a house rather than an apartment, because a good backyard is a cool place to sit, smoke, and check out the sky. Swimming pools are also a lot of fun, especially if you have one of those floatie couch things.
      3) hide all guns. Period. If for some reason you feel the need to have a gun accessible ( bad neighborhood, etc. ), make sure that you pick someone who can keep their wits about them to be the only person who knows where the gun(s) are stashed.
      4) pick out a bunch of cool movies and music. I recommend pink floyd and the cure, very kickass relaxing music to listen to, definitely inspires interesting thoughts. as far as movies, anything relaxing and cool. One of the most kick-ass movies I've watched tripping was The Last Unicorn. It brought back good childhood memories of fantasy worlds and inspired a sense of happiness. Also, anime movies are really kick-ass. I think anime was invented to be watched on hallucinogens.
      5) Complementary drugs are good. Most people want to stick w/ light stuff, like maybe a little bit of weed and some whip-its ( nitrous oxide ). Ketamine ( a cat tranquilizer, very disassociative, impossible to overdose on, good clean high that has no afteraffects ) is good too. Both nitrous oxide and ketamine highs enhance the trip sensation greatly for fairly short periods of time, so they're perfect for a complement to the acid. I also like an occasional speedball ( coke + heroin ) to go along w/ the trip, but that's probably a bit too heavy for you, and also has the effect of possibly ruining the trip if you do too much. I don't recommend drinking a lot, unless you're eating a fair amount ( which you may or may not feel like doing while tripping ) because you can end up really feeling like shit later because you can't really get drunk on acid, but you can have a nasty hangover later. I personally drink some, because I love the taste of good beer, but I'd skip it or moderate. Oh, yeah, a lot of people like combining ectasy and acid ( it's called candy-flipping ), but I wouldn't do it for your first time. I personally think ectasy ruins the mental effects of acid, since it gets you too fucked up physically.
      6) Snacks, and easy-to-prepare food, are a must. I love eating fruit while I'm tripping. Go for things w/ a very rich ( but not over-sweet ) taste, like watermelon or berries. You can eat anything while tripping, and definitely recommend that you do so to avoid any stomach aches from hunger, but there's some things that are just too hard ( try eating spaghetti in front of your parents while pretending to be tired - fuck, that was an adventure! ).
      7) Don't worry about having a bad trip. There are no such things as bad trips unless you freak out. All acid is either good ( as in it gets you high ) or bad ( in that it doesn't ). Yes, some dumbshits occasionally try to use strichnine to bond the liquid acid to blotter paper, but a lot of the acid going around in the past 8 years has been liquid, and a most of the people that dip the sheets ( if you get paper ) have learned better. Note to would-be dealers : if you have liquid acid, and want to make paper, don't even fucking think about strychnine. Just layer the blotter in a plexiglass dish, use dropper to deposit liquid on blotter paper, leave to dry on non-porous surface. You will not have a bad trip unless you freak out, which

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    12. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by ElectricPoppy · · Score: 1

      In addition to what others have suggested I'd recommend not taking too much. Do it a few times, but no more. It can give you problems later. I wish I'd stopped using it at about the half-way point of my total "career" with it.

    13. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad I took drugs as a teenager and young adult. It kept me from becoming an alchoholic. Unfortunately, something (probably some shrooms, probably the summation) messed up my liver. So now I have to worry about employers and even doctors finding out about it - get old, but not enough for medicare, and you're fucked. The drugs I have to take cost several hundred dollars a month, I live in fear of my wife getting fired and 18 months later the CORBA running out.

      But overall, I'm glad I did, it really _has_ helped me be smarter in the IT world, and definitely helped me cope in the younger days with asshole bosses. The really bizarro thing is that most of my druggie friends from high school and college have done very well, although they've mostly become Republicans!

      I hate living in fear of being drug tested, even though I haven't in many years. Investigate the history of the drug laws, it is eye-opening.

    14. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I personally like the following: Pink Floyd/outside in the woods"

      Wow -- I've seen a few different things in my days, but you actually _saw_ Pink Floyd in the woods?

      Man, I'll have 1/2 half of what you had please. ;-)

    15. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. The sixties have passed, hippy.

    16. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those weren't cops chasing you through the woods my friend, merely chipmunks.

    17. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by 5meodmt · · Score: 1

      How do you ensure you're getting the real thing? If it's active (you feel effects) and it's on a small piece of paper, it's real; nothing else is so active in such small doses (on hit 100 micrograms).

      Environment? This is the most important, be around people you trust with your life. It's best if their tripping too. Don't be around drunks (trust me!!). Don't be around sober people if they will talk to you alot, or mess with your head. Don't trip in public (unless you're at a Dead or other jam show where many others are tripping and everyone has empathy for trippers if they are not one themselves.) So to be safe, eat it with one, or a few of your best friends who has/have done it before, in a comfortable envirmonment with no opportunity of paranoia, and you'll have the experience of a lifetime.

      Help? The worst thing you can do is think about needing it. If you're scared of negative effects they are more likely to happen. Alot of weird stuff is going to happen that is very good, but may be thought of as bad by the anxious. But if it does come to a bad trip, the best they can do is reassure you, show their love to you, get you out of thought loops, or put on good, relaxing music (VERY helpful). Just sit and relax, don't overwhelm yourself with responsiblities (have none while your tripping, and DONT DRIVE). A good song, or a good friend's kind words can turn a bad trip 180 into the best experience of your life. But in all likelyhood, you won't geek. The worst you can do is wait for negative effects to happen. If things go very bad (VERY), take an anti-psychotic, or a sedative/tranquilizer (even possibly have a drink). But this should be a LAST resort, as in any negative experience there is a lesson to be learned (some of the best come from a bad experience).

      Another pointer? Have an art book with you. I'd suggest Salvador Dali, I've never visually experienced anything like Dali on acid. But any art if going to be great, especially if it's colorful and open-ended. You'll never look at those paintings the same again. Another idea, if you have a good place is tripping outdoors in nice weather, with no people around that aren't tripping, the sky, a sunset, nature is all very nice.

      It's all about set (your mind set going into the trip) and setting (your environment while tripping). Read up on it too. Check out LSD: My Problem Child, by Albert Hofmann, or wade through the vaults of erowid.org having to do with LSD. Remember you WILL have a great time, you will be amazed, and the effects will wear off eventually. It's probably a wise choice if your a little anxious to try shrooms first, as they last about half as long, and are in general, less intense.

      Most importantly, have fun!

    18. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by oneiron · · Score: 1

      How do you ensure you're getting the real thing? If it's active (you feel effects) and it's on a small piece of paper, it's real; nothing else is so active in such small doses (on hit 100 micrograms). This is no longer true, and this is a very dangerous way to take LSD. There are, at least, 2-3 easily obtainable "research chemicals" which are active in small enough doses to be placed on blotter paper. Additionally, the LD50 (lethal dose in 50% of test subjects) for these chemicals is potentially MUCH lower than that of LSD which has an extremely high LD50 in relation to a normal dose. Sure, you'll be fine if you take one hit.. The problem arises when 40 years of conditioning kick in, telling us that it's ok to take 10 hits of LSD because that's the way it has always been done. Take 10 hits of one of these other chemicals, and it is likely that you will not see tomorrow. DO NOT TRUST PAPER EVER AGAIN. Know your source...period. If you don't know that you can trust your source to be knowledgable enough to verify the presence of TRUE LSD, then never take more than 1 hit. The only safe choices, in this day and age, are the natural ones. Psilocybin Mushrooms and Mescaline containing cacti (peyote, san pedro, etc..)... That's pretty much it. Either one is every bit as safe as LSD in the proper dose-range, and many believe the experiences to be equally rewarding and possibly more gentle on the mind.

    19. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by 5meodmt · · Score: 1

      im pretty into those:) out of curiosity, could you point one out that dosage is measured in micrograms?

  34. Free as in beer or free as in drugs? by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
    So is this creative commons license the LSD book was licensed under, free as in beer, or free as in drugs.

    And remember
    Microsoft = "Free as in Drugs"(*)
    BSD = "Free as in Beer.
    Linux = "free as in Speach.

    (*) "With Microsoft, the first hit is always free - remember that all your life. They're going to all these different websites and having them become .Net websites. They say they're not going to make any money. For now, they'll not charge you for access to your Passport environment. Maybe soon they'll charge you $50. That's $50 that they're charging you for info that they stole from you." -- Scott McNealy

  35. Right on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone mod this up!

  36. April 16th, 1945 by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The walls have melted, and my lab assistant Charles has turned into a a lemur that resembles the late Kaiser Wilhelm.

    However, the flying mice assure me that this is perfectly normal."

  37. LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by localman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if anyone who has done LSD has also had experience with lucid dreaming? I have experimented to some degree with lucid dreaming, and after discussing acid trips with friends who've had them, I kind of theorize that LSD is very similar dreaming while awake.

    I'm 30 and I haven't tried LSD. It's not likely that I will, but I don't think it's wrong or particularly dangerous. It's possible I'd try it at some point if I got exceedingly bored with other means of exploring conciousness.

    But for now when I get the inclination for some exploration of conciousness, I just crack out the dream journal and go from there. I guess I think of LSD as cheating a bit. Like steroids or something.

    Of course, someone with experience with both might feel differently.

    Cheers.

    1. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by simetra · · Score: 2, Informative
      I used to take LSD but haven't in many years. I have been Lucid Dreaming quite a bit in the last few years. They're nothing alike.

      Lucid Dreaming is just knowing that you're in a dream, and doing whatever you want. You know it's a dream, you know there are no consequences. It's like playing a video game. You can stop playing and go about your life.

      LSD completely alters your perceptions and how you think - or how you interpret your thought. You're committed to the experience. You can't just walk out.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    2. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

      Never tried LSD, shrooms a handful with only one good experience (rest were weak batches and improper setting). I've known about lucid dreaming for some time although only experienced it at a low level (hey this doesn't make sense, got to be a dream... but that's the extent of it).

      I'd be inclined to agree, I bet they have a lot in common and would love to learn/experiment more with lucid dreaming. Any suggestions?

      I wouldn't say LSD is cheating at all... same for shrooms... or any other psychadelic for that matter. They take you to places you cannot go on your own, at least normally. Very very interesting places. I'd recommend it to anyone, assuming you can handle the brief levels of near insanity (that's why they call it a trip). It really does alter your life permanently - never looks at things quite the same way again. Potential for exploring the unknown (and just having an amazingly fun time) is very high.

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    3. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had very little lucid dreaming experience. Maybe a couple moments in all my dreams have been mindful of being in a dream and were remembered. I exerted control over reality in those moments.

      LSD trips are not like lucid dreams. Objective reality remains around you, with your slightly less inhibited credulity catalyzed by altered sensory perceptions and altered interpretations of those perceptions. In the luckiest of scenarios will you find your misinterpretation of reality coinciding with your willed modification of reality with sufficient experiential regularity that it amounts to a (delusionally) believed telekinetic control over reality.

      But maybe I haven't eaten enough LSD.

      (Note: The author of this article assumes the existence of an objective reality from which one may delusionally diverge.)

    4. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way. Not even close. It is extremely similar to an opiate trance though.

    5. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've taken (and enjoyed) a fair amount of acid, and I have lucid dreams from time to time.

      There are some aspects that are similar, and some that are not, so I'll try to explain.
      The feeling in a dream where things just feel a little bit askew is what you get with acid, but about 100 times stronger. I often have emotions or understandings of things that I only feel when dreaming, or I can reinvoke them with some effort later by thinking about dreams. (I assume this is what you do with the dream journal.)

      An acid trip is basically this, but very intense. There are also some fun visuals, but the real meat of it is the new places it takes your mind; you notice different things than you would have sober, and you notice different connections with things and come to different conclusions about them. One of the most important things I've gotten from acid is a re-examination of a lot of the things I take for granted. This is something you can find in dreams, but not as sudden and intense.

      I would say that in general a lucid dream is a lot more different than reality, i.e. you can fly, there are people there that never existed, etc. With acid you're in the same old world, but your perception of it is much more radically changed than when you're dreaming.

      I see what you're saying about the cheating; I enjoy meditating and lucid dreaming and think it has improved my life immensely. But if you'd like a big dose all at once, acid is pretty great. There are definitely things I've experienced on acid that I haven't gotten any other ways.

      If you are tempted to try it, there's a pretty good thread above with first-timer advice, and I think someone posted some links to FAQs.

    6. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not remotely the same.

      LSD, though powerful, is still just a drug that tweaks perception of waking reality.

      When you are dreaming, you are not perceiving in any way waking reality.

    7. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by localman · · Score: 1

      Yeah -- I can see that the commitment level would make a substantial difference.

      Aside from that, though, the content of a trip vs. a dream... how different are they? I realize this is most likely different for everyone. But I've had dreams that were totally wacky where space and time seem totally pliable both in and out of my control. This is something many of my slightly acidic friends report. And I have had a couple of lucid dreams where I was able to exit the dreamspace and just think while asleep. I was able to perform amazing feats of mental exploration and creativity that seemed nearly godlike to me at the time. However upon waking I couldn't quite put it all back together. Again, this is a common theme in the trips I've heard recounted.

      I'm curious your opinion of all that...?

      Cheers.

    8. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that they're rather different.

      Lucid dreaming, to me, is more disconnected from reality. Perhaps I would liken it to an incredibly strong trip with a near-complete ego loss (but not enough that I'd forgotten who "the dreamer" was). I particularly enjoy making the world shift and change according to what I'm thinking, during lucid dreams.

      I've done LSA, but not LSD, and some other non-amphetamine phenethylamine compounds (mescaline, 2C-T-2). Their effects seem to be more of a boost to real-world sensation. It's like someone is cranking up the volume on the senses.

      However, there is one point of similarity between the two states, in that I frequently engage in free-association of concepts while I'm under. You know, that feeling where one idea sort of flows into the next and you feel like there's a net of idea connections in your head. When I'm lucid dreaming, it's more difficult to have access to the past because I'm afraid that not going with the flow will break the lucidity. While tripping, however, it's more a lack of concentration itself that makes it difficult to remember a chain of logic. However, that doesn't mean it's impossible once attempted.

    9. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by localman · · Score: 1

      If you want to try lucid dreaming I'd definitely check out this faq. The basics are to keep a detailed dream journal and to do little mantras about remembering your dreams as you fall asleep each night. It's all just suggestion, really. It's also a lot of work.

      I guess that's why I say acid might be cheating... because I'm not sure as you said, that it "takes you to places you cannot go on your own", but rather takes you to places that you can't go without a lot of work on your own -- i.e. meditation and working on lucid dreaming. Just a theory, though.

      Maybe once I feel I've explored lucid dreaming thoroughly I'll give acid a try and see if it really does take me in new directions.

      Thanks for the comment. Best of luck to you.

    10. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by localman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your comments. Very interesting. I don't think I'm ready for LSD yet (heh, maybe when I'm 50?) but I may have to give it a whirl at some point.

      Cheers.

    11. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by localman · · Score: 1

      You know, that feeling where one idea sort of flows into the next and you feel like there's a net of idea connections in your head.

      Yes -- I've played with this both awake and sleeping. I used to play a game with some friends where we'd take turns having to say three words that were completely unrelated in our minds rather quickly:

      metaverse

      potato

      calvin klein

      for example. It's actually pretty tough to do back and forth as your mind loves to make connections between things. It's like trying to do a true SELECT word FROM brain WHERE id = RAND(), which your brain seems to resist while awake.

      Anyways, sometimes in my dreams I'll sort of fall into a non-dream unconcious awareness, and I'll play this game with myself and be able to come up instantly with endless strings of unconnected words and concepts. It can go so fast that it's exhilirating. It feels like I really do have sort of random access to my brain during those times, and it's kinda neat. Somtimes I'll feel I'm being amazingly creative, too.

      Of course, I can never remember much of the details when I wake up :)

      Cheers.

    12. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by Rhone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My experience is somewhat similar to yours. I've had many lucid dreams (though none recently... maybe _I_ should whip out the dream journal soon), and I've also had what I believe were real out-of-body experiences. I've had some other spiritual experiences that went along with all that.

      I suspect that LSD does put your mind basically in a waking dream state. I suspect that, on a chemical level, it flips whatever switch that normally keeps your dream hallucinations off while you're awake. I haven't tried LSD, though, so I can't compare the actual experience to lucid dreaming.

      Like you, I feel like taking drugs for that kind of experience is cheating. (No offense to anyone who feels differently--that's a decision I make for myself and I don't judge others who decide differently.) Of course, I also very rarely drink caffeine (I figure something is seriously wrong with me if I have to _depend_ on a stimulant to function normally), likewise I don't drink alcohol and certainly wouldn't do it just to make socializing easier (if I'm being overly shy, then maybe that's something I need to work on instead of covering it up with chemicals), and when I need to drop a few pounds, I do it through eating healthy and exercising rather than popping stimulant-laced diet pills. Achieving goals through intelligent, persistant effort gives me a sense of accomplishment that would be seriously lacking if I had the goal handed to me by a drug.

      So, while I can't compare the actual experience of tripping on LSD with lucid dreaming (I suspect the primary difference is the "you're trapped in the altered state for a while" quality another responder mentioned), I _can_ compare the lasting effects on my personality and happiness that I've gained from my non-drug-induced altered states of consciousness, with what others have said here about what they've gained from having used LSD.

      And I find those lasting effects to be quite similar. People are talking about having gained new insights into themselves and the world, and overcoming significant personality flaws as a result of LSD experiences. I feel like I have had the same benefit from meditation (and other spiritual experiences) and a strong desire to improve myself and overcome my flaws. I went from very shy, anxious, unmotivated, and depressive to being very confident, motivated, and happy, in a relatively short period of time. My outlook on life and my place in it changed rather drastically. Most of that change happened in a relatively short period of time (a few months, perhaps).

    13. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by localman · · Score: 1

      Achieving goals through intelligent, persistant effort gives me a sense of accomplishment that would be seriously lacking if I had the goal handed to me by a drug.

      Yeah -- your comment pretty much sums up how I feel. I don't intend to put anyone else's experimentation choices down, but I know that I'd feel less proud of myself if I went the other root. I imagine that could change in the future, but overall I think there's an experience to be had by getting through everything without chemical help -- and that's a trip in itself :)

      Cheers.

  38. High on life by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's people with no actual LSD knowledge who hallucinate such side effects as memory loss, significant "flashbacks", and brainfry. There are tiny percentages of actual users who have experienced some of these effects, but they're traceable to repressed psychotic drives of people who foolishly take the drug, often out of a selfdestructive urge. Drugs aren't for everybody, but fearmongering is apparently less exclusive.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:High on life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drugs aren't for everybody, but fearmongering is apparently less exclusive.

      Please see this post.

    2. Re:High on life by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      Fearmongering has surrounded the culture of drugs for quite some time and it's not going to go away any time soon. Unfortunately, all drugs tend to get lumped into one category by the vast majority of people. Then there are those who go way overboard on drug use that also help to increase the stigma, fear and ignorance.

      Not sure what my point was... and I'm not high. Actually I haven't had my coffee yet.

  39. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. TRY MUSHROOMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Mushrooms are great. Almost same as LSD, but no brain fry.

    I have a friend who has done them weekly for last 25 years w/no known side effects. in fact he credits the 'enlightnment' the shrooms gave him in becoming an internet multi-millionaire.

    Easy to grow

  40. MUSHROOMS are COOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mushrooms are great. Almost same as LSD, but no brain fry.

    I have a friend who has done them weekly for last 25 years w/no known side effects. In fact he credits the 'enlightnment' the shrooms gave him in becoming an internet multi-millionaire.

    Easy to grow

    1. Re:MUSHROOMS are COOL by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      Actually, LSD isn't very neuro-toxic at all. Which is partly exhibited by it's relatively high LD50 compared to 'recreational dose'.

      -psy

    2. Re:MUSHROOMS are COOL by zedpol · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but LD50 says nothing about neurotoxicity. LD50 = the dose that kills 50% of the subjects taking it. Notice i said kills, not kills brain cells, nor causes adverse effects. Besides the LD50 is a pretty useless measurement in pharmacology anyways, you want to use the LD50/ED50 ratio or the LD1/ED99. ED= dose that is effective in X % of people. Those ratios give you the safety factor of a drug. For example, the LD1/ED99 is 9. That means a lethal dose for 1% of the population is 9 times as large as the dose that is effective for 99% of the population. A LD1/ED99 is quite good, lots of perscription drugs have a safety factor that is much lower than that. Anyways there are lots of other ways to use those #s but your use of LD50 is way off.

      --
      --I swear, it was a case of isolated idiopathic hemibalissmus
    3. Re:MUSHROOMS are COOL by Gyan · · Score: 1

      Can you cite some human/animal studies that LSD is neurotoxic within recreational dose ranges?

      (All substances are neurotoxic at *some* dose, so let's not go there.)

    4. Re:MUSHROOMS are COOL by TolkiEinstein · · Score: 1

      I agree, mushrooms are much nicer than acid. Though I haven't taken either in over 10 years, were I to indulge again I'd opt for the 'shrooms. The key difference between them: mushrooms let you down easy whereas the burnout on acid is exhaustive and drawn-out. Another difference: mushrooms have lots of little ups & downs whereas acid has one big up & one big down. Simply put, 'shrooms are more natural whereas acid is more chemical. I'm surprised to see a thread like this on SD. To think, I check out tech forums to distance myself from acid-heads.

  41. Re:News for Nerds? by genner · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fonzi jumped a shark and all the other tv show are doing it.

  42. these are southpark quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the humour/sp impaired mods

  43. It's entirely possible to change without drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just "get high on life." I overcame my shyness problem with a similar sort of one-time experience, but it had nothing to do with drugs, but rather a group of friends who were all "tripping" on the same wavelength in an evening.

    Drugs have nothing to do with it. They're just crutches for people who don't have powerful enough imaginations.

    1. Re:It's entirely possible to change without drugs by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You just "get high on life." I overcame my shyness problem with a similar sort of one-time experience, but it had nothing to do with drugs, but rather a group of friends who were all "tripping" on the same wavelength in an evening.

      Drugs have nothing to do with it. They're just crutches for people who don't have powerful enough imaginations.


      Since you posted as an AC, I probably shouldn't even respond, but others may feel the same, so maybe it deserves a response.

      I agree a drug for the purpose of overcoming shyness is certainly a crutch. That doesn't invalidate it. Taking Paxil to treat anxiety disorder is a crutch as well, but doctors prescribe it every day for precisely that purpose. In fact, taking almost any sort of drug for almost any sort of condition, is a crutch. Taking an aspirin for a headache is a crutch. Taking a multivitamin instead of eating a balanced diet with all the nutrients you need, is a crutch. So what?

      But let's get away from the analogy and go right to the source. People with broken legs use crutches. They don't have to. They could walk on their broken legs, endure the pain and live with the consequence which might be lifelong problems with their legs. Or they could stay laid up in bed until the leg heals.

      The point is, a crutch serves the primary purpose of expediting recovery/cure. So your point that it is a crutch is kind of meaningless.

      You had your particular experience and that's great that it worked for you, but can you tell me exactly how to reproduce that experience FOR ME! If you can, you should write a book, because shyness is a problem that affects millions of people and I'm sure it will make you rich.

      But I doubt you can, which is why your argument doesn't hold much water. Now, that said, I'm not advocating that shy people should go out and do LSD. In fact, in most cases, I'd counsel against it, but I think it's a personal choice each person should make based on their own needs, desires, and beliefs. Just as it should be their choice to take any other drug, prescribed or otherwise.

  44. My first trip... by Superfreaker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My first week at college in undergrad. All decked out in my preppy kahkis and docksiders, trying to fit in, some of the other frosh invited me to a Grateful Dead concert in Boston MA (Fall 1993).

    When I got there I was overwhelmed with sensory overload and I had not taken anything yet. My previous experience up to that point had been some high school binge drinking (think Mad Dog 20/20) and smoking pot a few times.

    One of my new friends scored some paper and he offered to me what looked like a corner of some construction paper, no bigger than what a hole punch would spit out. I didn't think anything like that could do much so I ate it.

    An hour later I'm running around like a mad man, still decked out in a polo shirt and kahkis. It was an awesome experience and from that moment on I felt everyone should do acid at least once in their lives.

    I haven't done it in a few years, but I hope to change that. A lot of stuff builds up in your brain, locked away that needs to be cleansed every once in a while. You may have to fight some deamons along teh way, but once its over, the next day the world is a beautiful new place.
    Happy travels!

    1. Re:My first trip... by simetra · · Score: 1

      Yes... other people have posted the same sentiment, using the exact same wording that I used to use to describe why I took it; to clean out the cobwebs of my mind. It's a shame that our society has demonized something that can be used as a great tool of the human experience.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    2. Re:My first trip... by Anarcho-Goth · · Score: 1

      My first week at college in undergrad. All decked out in my preppy kahkis and docksiders, trying to fit in

      There's more to life than looking like an ad for the Gap.

      Too bad your first experience was with The Greatful Dead. Sorry, I just don't care for it. My first experience I was at my apartment and I decided what I really wanted to listen to was Miles Davis Kind of Blue. I did own some Pink Floyd records (I think it is legally required when going to college) but I had no desire to listen to them.

      That night I came to the conclusion that Miles Davis is God. I might have been mistaken. At the time I couldn't tell the difference between a muted trumpet and a tenor saxophone (I just knew that it was good music) and I hadn't started listening to John Coltrane's solo records yet.

      --
      I hate Liberals and Conservatives.
      If you are a Liberal or a Conservative, then HAVE A NICE DAY!
      Courage.
  45. Ego death... by k31bang · · Score: 2, Funny

    You used to use LSD to experice Ego Death. But these days you get your job outsourced to india for the same effect.

    --
    -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
  46. WTF? by tail.man · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I give up.

    You put up stories like this and legos and all kinds of crap.

    Meanwhile you refuse real stories.

    Gigantic, idiotic story, what did it do give a flashback?

    What is your demographic, teenagers?

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/globalwarmingisascam
    1. Re:WTF? by WebBORG · · Score: 0

      If you want real stories, how bout heading over to fox5.com. Im sure they'll have enough BS and propaganda to fill your head for days.

  47. Here's my lucid dreaming url by simetra · · Score: 1
    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Here's my lucid dreaming url by localman · · Score: 1

      Interesting -- yes, some of those dreams remind me of things I've experienced, i.e. analyzing something that I know is just a creation of my mind and marvelling at the detail and vividness of it, astonished at my mind's ability to create a rich reality.

      If LSD is way different then any of the things I've described (in my other comment) then maybe I will have to give it a try before I check out of here.

      Thanks for the comments. Cheers.

    2. Re:Here's my lucid dreaming url by simetra · · Score: 1

      Mail me some!

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    3. Re:Here's my lucid dreaming url by localman · · Score: 1

      Mail you some dream journal entries? If that's what you'd like I'll collect a few :)

  48. No Tin Foil Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The excerpt is very similar to something that happened to me after doing a cube of LSD (circa 70's).
    A friend (also dosed) and I stood at either side of a door watching the party within the room and we both glanced up at each other and a conversation ensued between us, both of us, immediately realizing we weren't speaking, (our hands gesturing wildly to each other that same premise) refused to blink for fear of breaking this spell.
    This went on for well over 50 seconds, our eyes ever widening, when finally, it just dissipated. We both simultaneously gushed each others aforementioned conversation to each other.
    It was almost broadcast like, a twin thing, I suppose.
    He later was best man at my wedding.
    True story.

  49. Opium for the Masses by ElectricPoppy · · Score: 1

    by Jim Hogshire is a good one, if you are into poppy-derived drugs. And I don't know how you couldn't be. Unless you're allergic. What a horrible life that would be.

    1. Re:Opium for the Masses by 5meodmt · · Score: 1

      This has no place in a psychedelic discussion. The two are almost complete opposites.

  50. Psychedelics by caryw · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hah! I'd expect to find this article on Smokedot but not here. But oh well, while there's an intelligent audience:
    LSD was huge in the 60's and 70's but has greatly diminished in recent years. This decline is due primarily to incredibly reduced availability on the black market. LSD is not easily produced, and the punishment for possession of even small amounts resulted in ridiculous amounts of jail time. Because of these factors youth these days hardly have the opportunity to influence their mind with LSD. This doesn't mean that kids these days don't trip, they've just found other ways. Some of the modern popular psychedelics are:

    5-MeO-DiPT (Foxy) - Similar to LSD with some of the "rolling" effects of MDMA (ecstacy)

    2C-I - A trippy phenethylamine

    5-MeO-AMT - Very potent tryptamine

    2C-T-2 - Very powerful hallucinogen
    What makes these "new" drugs so interesting is that many have not yet been scheduled by the DEA. Although a few on the list above were recently added to Schedule 1 by an emergency scheduling process. Unscheduled drugs are simply chemicals that can be legally possessed and sold and therefore are done so over the internet. A lot of modern "drug dealers" buy these chemicals cheap on the internet and sell them in their locality. A couple popular distributors are:

    Rac:Research

    LTK Research Products

    Omega Fine Chemicals
    Just to give you guys an idea of what kids are up to these days

    - Cary
    FAIRFAX UNDERGROUND where fairfax county comes out to play

    1. Re:Psychedelics by AmishSlayer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You forgot 5MEO-DMT and 2C-T-7

      5MEOwid.org/chemicals/5meo_dmt is a 15 minute mind blowing trip trip (great for lunch hours ;)... honestly though, I never did the lunch hour thing.

      2C-T-7, well it's just great.

      Also you can get LSA (an LSD derivitive) from Hawiian Baby Woodrose seeds or from morning glory seeds.

      And let us not forget good old san pedro cactus which is another mescaline source

    2. Re:Psychedelics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Let me guess: you're trying to get the DEA to schedule the rest.

      Mods, hide the parent.

    3. Re:Psychedelics by caryw · · Score: 1

      Chances are the DEA is already trying to schedule the rest. I actually considered not posting the distributors but i'm not going to censor myself. If this audience isn't mature enough for the topic at hand than i'm not sure what audience would be

    4. Re:Psychedelics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this audience isn't mature enough for the topic at hand than i'm not sure what audience would be

      Have you ever browsed at -1?

    5. Re:Psychedelics by caryw · · Score: 1

      yes, it's terrifying. but even our gnaa trolls, etc are 100x better than most public forums

    6. Re:Psychedelics by Qwaniton · · Score: 1

      Ever since I first browsed at -1, that day I got mod points and went out to "look for abuses", I've found it consistently more entertaining.

    7. Re:Psychedelics by 5meodmt · · Score: 1

      dont forget 5meo-dmt!

    8. Re:Psychedelics by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, delicious :)

  51. so where can i get some? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any acid suppliers in the uk?

  52. Reality is NOT absolute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    according to quantum physics there is no objective view of the universe.

    1. Re:Reality is NOT absolute by genner · · Score: 1

      Hence, I subscribe to string theory. Quantum physic theories all break down with large objects.

  53. disregarding conciousness by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    One of the most valuable psychedelic experiences is the metaexperience: that "experience" itself is a mental construct, not inherent to the experienced reality. The hallucinations typically don't survive reentry to the unmedicated state. But the happy "disillusionment" frees the user from the misconception that reality is as simple as it looks. Which is almost as rewarding as realistic astral projection.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  54. done both. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Even while lucid dreaming I have not had full freedom, instead lucid dreams for me have been random situations or encounters that I could feel myself making choices on. Rarely was I able to do anything completely crazy like fly in a lucid dream because my conscious mind would take over and realize that wasn't possible.

    LSD is like a waking dream where you have very little control. The control isn't just what you see or hear... but often what you fell and most importantly the walls you have with your normal interactions are completely invalidated. While on LSD I have seen the depths of my soul, the limits of my rationalizing and typically after a session where I tried to think have come out of it with a different understanding and vantage on issues about my own personal ego. I've also experienced a bad trip that had me believing for about 24 hours after the initial dose that I had damaged myself to the point of being unable to operate within society any more. LSD is like stepping back into 3rd person mode and looking at your life, your world, your interactions as though someone from Disney was pulling the reigns except occasionally they go pee and Tim Burton takes over for a bit.

    Mushrooms tend to be a much more mellow and social experience. Doing shrooms with a group of good friends can be a really amazing experience and help you build trust and understanding with those friends that most people would be envious of.

    Personally I believe everyone should do Shrooms or LSD at least once in their life... however I believe this should be with someone who is trained to help you have a good time, help you understand or someone who simply understands your goals going in. While the occasional diversion from everyone else's reality can be great, doing these drugs too often is stupid. Remember it only takes a few weeks to train new neuropathways in your brain... if you are habitually tripping you risk making some of these off-kilter synapse paths long lasting. Also, if you are already taking an SSRI or such... just don't.

  55. What is reality really? by AsATh0Th · · Score: 1

    Well maybe it isnt what you think it is. Is not reality an agreement of what exist/is possible? We didnt chose it but our mind did probably in its evolution. We cant fly because our mind know that its not possible and therefore will react by crashing to the ground.
    Science proved that it is gravity acting and because our body weight something we cant do anything but go crashing to the floor. Well thats what science say and i believe that our reality is acting accordingly to the laws science have found but im not sure if these laws are really absolute or if in fact they are just made up by our brain and the way it evoluted from its beginning to now. You know when the first life on earth whatever it was that found the way to fly did he first had wings or did it just tryed to do it and his brain reacted the way it wanted? You see i think reality act the way it do because we think/want it to act that way. Our brains probably work by doing what it is supposed to do in reality. Like a computer program that react to its input change he react to reality. In fact i think reality is in fact like a big virtual reality world and were the program, we play reality. Now if we could find the way to see/do non-normal things like by using psychedelics maybe we could find more truth about this game.

    I have some experience with psychedelics and most of them have been very profound and life changing. I remember my first trip: it was pretty good. I dont remember much i forgot about everything but fragment the minute i came down but i remember telling myself this was ... really powerfull and that it would change my life. Music was so wonderfull on it. I would kill someone to feel this trip again. Pretty much all trips unless the latter one was very profound and really keeewwwwl.You see its like if life opened to you and you felt really changed by it on psychedelics. I definitely recommend doing it but you have to know what u do. Keep respect for the drug it can show you awesome stuff and everything will go fine. I recommend doing it just with a close friend or alone listening to music if its your first time.
    Beeing with people you dont know/trust can be freaky on drug. Just enjoy the trip dont be scared nothing can happen or well everything can happen ;P

  56. life on high by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Some drugs, especially those that directly affect not only sensual perception, but also self-perception (in varying degrees of selfreference), can demonstrate in a learning scenario that the experienced environment is more complex than is normally experienced. This is true of many intense learning scenarios, some of which are chemically induced, others geographically (like travel, mountain climbing, SCUBA), or through human-scale prosthetics (videogames, guns, telepresence) that extend our senses or motor action.

    Aberration depends on your overly strict definition of "normal". Along the lines you use, hunger is normal, and satiety from food is aberrant, dependent as it is on consuming external chemicals. While mind-altering chemical use (beyond even the legally accepted alcohol, caffeine, sucrose and nicotine) is also integral to all known societies, past and present.

    Your statements admit your inability to process descriptions of experiencing the limits of perception. But taking the drugs you dismiss (and probably fear) is not necessary to understand them. Opening your mind, using your imagination, and accepting the possiblity that drugs could offer you some benefit, is necessary. Try it - you'll like it.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:life on high by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      Aberration depends on your overly strict definition of "normal". Along the lines you use, hunger is normal, and satiety from food is aberrant, dependent as it is on consuming external chemicals.
      What are you ... high? (That was a joke.)

      Obviously neither hunger or being satiated is an aberrant state, since most of us experience both daily as part of the process of life. But hunger is the closer of the two, as it is a reaction stemming from the lack of food (which produces the energy your cells need to continue).

      Even you understand the difference between "external chemicals" that get broken down by your digestive system for their chemical energy and "external chemicals" that cause malfunctions in the your nervous system (for instance, anaesthetics). One we call "food." The other we call "drugs." That's a part of the commonly-accepted definition of "reality" that even you have to accept.

      Similarly, it would be pretty severe to describe holding your breath until you go dizzy as an "aberrant state," but it is obviously the result of producing a state in your brain that isn't "normal," namely the lack of oxygen (which your brain needs to function properly).

      You don't really have as hard a time understaning this concept as you pretend to. You just have an agenda to push, which is why you try so hard to use big words.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:life on high by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm not pretending to have a hard time understanding anything. I understand your projection of your ignorance, the source of your fear, onto me. Especially when you try to cover up your spin with a joke.

      People have, since time immemorial, used drugs to alter our minds temporarily, obtaining more permanent insight into our minds and the reality we experience. Your logic is circular: you assert that drugs are "aberrant" because they cause "malfunctions" - while I back up my claims that drug use is normal, with history and benefits. You invoke the empty argument of the "commonly-accepted definition of 'reality'". Reality is independent of human apperception, perception, apprehension, comprehension, and all the rest of our described experience of it. We're talking about human experience, the independent nature of which must remain merely dependent on, not identical to, that which we experience, regardless of what we've eaten lately.

      BTW, my agenda is mental freedom. If you can't keep up with the language, maybe you're just not ready for it yet. I defy you to be proud of your own hidden agenda to supress that freedom, to keep others as ignorant and constrained.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:life on high by PCM2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Honestly, I don't really give a rat's ass how you spend your weekends, Doc. By the same token, if you can't get used to life when you're not on drugs, maybe you're just not ready for it yet.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:life on high by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Occasional drug use does not of course equate to chronic drug use, any more than attending lectures equates to a career as grad student. If you ever get your courage together to try some helpful drug, you'll look back on your current black/white binary worldview as the chains which held you too long. Or maybe you'll just keep trying to "get used to life", without living it to the hilt. Your choice - just keep your distance from the rest of us dancing away whenever we please.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:life on high by aminorex · · Score: 1

      One of Doc's points is that you, sir, are on
      drugs. "Drugs" is a word. A phonetic construct used to symbolize a meaning which has a extensional and an intensional structure. Part of the way you are using that word is as a tool to exert political power over others, and it is reasonable for Doc to infer that you fear them, since there is no rational expectation of personal benefit to be derived from that exercise of power. But in fact, you are under the influence of the chemicals which are present in your brain. Many of these are the same chemicals that play important roles in the metabolism, for example, of LSD. Until and unless your brain is analyzed and assayed, there is no particular reason to think that your present brain function is closer to my basal metabolic brain function than it is to my brain function under some undetermined acute stress.

      If you will review the text of your exchange with Doc from a neutral perspective, I think you will have to agree that you are just failing to apprehend important aspects of your own nature, behaviour, and operation, and that, willfully.

      If you can't get used to life when you're on drugs, maybe you're just not ready for it yet.

      That sentence is no more or less meaninful that the inverse which you expressed.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    6. Re:life on high by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      So you're too stupid to understand how your mind works, even when you get the behind-the-scenes tour. You're so stuck in your own preconceptions that you guess that NYC, where I live, is a suburb. In your Soviet Russian mental gulag, psychedelic drugs are wasted on *you*. But having used the insights gained through psychedelic exploration for fun and profit, I can look at your infantile prison with both pity and smug superiority. Just admit you're one of the people who even drugs can't help, and keep your foolish judgements to yourself.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:life on high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In your Soviet Russian mental gulag, psychedelic drugs are wasted on *you*.
      love it
    8. Re:life on high by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      Doc I just felt I should tell you that I am watching Discovery Channel right now and there is a macaque on.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  57. LSD for programmers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Informative

    The best book I've read about LSD was one of the first published: John C. Lilly's Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer. Lilly invented the isolation tank (known from the amusing, but fictional, Frankenstein movie _Altered States_), and wrote Meta/Programming while one of the USA's foremost clinical psychoanalysts, a study for the NIMH just prior to the political outlawing of legitimate LSD research. In it, Lilly totally nails LSD's role as noise in the neurotransmission system, incidentally offering seminal insight into the nascent field of cybernetics (when the most advanced computers were dumber than your watch). And it's a really short book, without all the fancy indulgence in sensory hallucinations and utopian speculation so common in the field.

    Try reading it - you might learn more not only about your self, but about your computer, and how similar you might one day become.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:LSD for programmers by IBX · · Score: 1

      John C. Lilly was one of the first victims of ketamine abuse. (He called it "my vitamine K") Lilly made quite a downhill route - from a brilliant iconoclastic scientist/physician all the way to a new-age incoherent shaman.

      There was very telling, sad interview with Lilly in OMNIMAG archives (I believe it was taken offline recently). He ended up believing in a "world control center" staffed by aliens which was sending him messages by telephaty.

      Also, the comments like "I took acid 20 times and feel no ill effects" sounds lot like "I played russian rullete and it did nothing to me". The stats are off because acid burnouts usualy do not post on Slashdot.

    2. Re:LSD for programmers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lilly's addiction to the completely different drug, ketamine, is no reflection on LSD's effects. Claiming it is sounds a lot like "reading Slashdot is bad because of the kiddy porn on the Internet". While many of the Slashdot posts *I* read seem written by some kind of burnout, claims of LSD's imagined danger require actual valid stats and unconflicted citations. The pervasive history of maligning LSD users with lies, from ignorance or vested opposing interests, makes this a case of outrageous claims requiring substantial evidence.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:LSD for programmers by linzeal · · Score: 1

      They do not print it anymore but it should be on Edonkey.

    4. Re:LSD for programmers by k4rm4_p0l7c3 · · Score: 1

      Everybody needs some time away
      Just stuck in the k-hole again
      An 18 hour holiday
      Just stuck in the k-hole again, just once again

      Mrs. Kitty Ketamine your perseverance may
      Outlast my ambition to go home
      Infatuation with your dark side I obey
      Forbidden pleasures, I have grown to love

  58. Roky Erickson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once had the pleasure of meeting Roky Erickson about 20 years ago, a man with a deep history of drug abuse (including lots and lots and lots of LSD), institutional commitment and electroshock therapy. He and his mother brought his small guitar practice amp into the music store in south Austin where I worked as a teenager and kept complaining that it was shocking him thru his guitar. The amp had the ground lug cut off the power plug, and his mother explained that he always played it while standing barefoot on a damp concrete floor. I tried repeatedly to explain to him that the amp must be properly grounded and that he needed to stand on something to insulate his bare feet from the damp concrete, but his mind was so permanently fogged up that it was impossible for him to even come close to understanding why he was getting electrocuted. He was living in a state of perpetual unreality and complete absence of an attention span. His mother assured me that he was completely sober at that time and that in fact he was having one of his 'good days'. We took pity on him and sold him a battery-powered "Pignose" practice amp cheap so he could play his guitar at home without getting shocked.

  59. Many are showing their ignorance on the subject by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    They think drugs are something that bad people do in back alleys somewhere. They probably killed someone to get their fix. They've been told that rational, reasonable, responsible people could never use recreational substances on occasion without turning into homocidal maniacs.

    It's pretty sad, really.

  60. Umm... by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. oh .. ermm ... VST?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  61. Yup, you're an idiot by b00m3rang · · Score: 1
    It's as if I tried to create "beer culture" or "vodka culture" or maybe "swiss cheese culture" and pass it off as a valid lifestyle choice.

    Yeah, like "music culture" or "computer culture" or how about "surfer culture". Utterly invalid.

    How dare you get people with a common interest together and call it a culture?
  62. What are you smoking? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "It is much more than just a drug book though, and what's better, it has been released under a Creative Commons license."

    No, the *release* of a crap book under a CC license would, in that poster's opinion, be *much* better than the crap book itself. If you can't parse their fairly simple sentence through your apparent haze of antipathy to the CC license, you probably won't get much out of a book about LSD.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:What are you smoking? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      If you can't parse their fairly simple sentence through your apparent haze of antipathy to the CC license, you probably won't get much out of a book about LSD

      Wow. Wow... Wow.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:What are you smoking? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Blew your mind with a quip about LSD... that'll be $1 ;).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:What are you smoking? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, is suspect no one here really *knows* what window pain is...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:What are you smoking? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Ironically, they're too "square" for such ideas to "gel".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  63. re: book. 5/10 by Rage+Maxis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Okay, I read the book (it only took an hour or less). I lived in the neighborhood the story describes for several years and am dating a korean girl. This made it a bit more interesting at first.

    This should have been 3 times as long. The plot is barely coherent at times, although the critical events are covered it is not as verbose as one might have liked. The characters are barely developed -- they are introduced and disappear.

    I found it to be more like a side-story xfiles episode, only with about 30 minutes of content. When I read a book I expect at least a 3 hour movie of development and content.

    5/10.

    ragemaxis

    --
    --- ask me about nihilism, I will have nothing to tell you.
  64. "narcotic", too by timothy · · Score: 1

    The word "narcotic" is also stretched to mean much more than it used to / ought to. In particular, government agents talking about drugs will use the term as if it were equivalent to any currently illegal psychoactive. Cocaine, for instance, is frequently labeled a narcotic, which it isn't.

    Codeine, on the other hand, qualifies.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  65. shrooms last less time than LSD? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1

    Golly, that's news to me. My experience with mushrooms was that they were fun for a while (after it started to kick in, which took more than an hour) but after about eight hours I'd start to hope that the magical light show would end and I'd be able to get some sleep before having to face the next day of classes or work! If LSD lasts longer than that, no thank you. Even during college I couldn't afford to lose a whole day tripping.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:shrooms last less time than LSD? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Nah, from what I hear that was near limit for mushrooms. About average for lsd.
      Figure 7-9 hours for lsd (outside odd cases or massive under/over dose) and about 6-8 for mushrooms. Note I only have second hand info for mushrooms.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  66. DXM!!! by extra+the+woos · · Score: 1

    Certainly lsd or mushrooms (and other tryptamines) can be great drugs, I would recommend trying something else first. It's called DXM, which is short for dextromethorphan. It's an ingredient in over the counter cough syrups. Before you laugh, read on.

    I have seen others in this thread talking about ketamine, dxm is *very* similar to ketamine. It is recognizably similar to nitrous oxide as well. (They are all in the same family of drugs, disassociative analgesics).

    Here's what you do: Go down to safeway or fred meyers, and buy a bottle of "robitussion cough gels" or "dexalone" or "robitussion maximum strength cough". READ THE INGREDIENTS LIST. Make SURE SURE SURE the only active ingredient is dextromethorphan hydrobromide. Make absolutely sure :). It doesn't matter if you get pills or syrup though. Just get one bottle to start with, this will be 300mg (pills) or 354mg (syrup) total. On your way to the checkout, grab a frappucino. Pay, go to your car, drive home. Play some music, open the bottle, open the frap. PLUG YOUR NOSE, CHUG THE SYRUP (or just take the pills 4-5 at a time) then rinse your mouth with the frapp and swallow :). Then eat a small peice of bread and chill for a while. ABSOLUTELY DO NOT SMOKE WEED WITH DXM if its your first (or 10th for that matter) time doing dxm... Absolutely do NOT DO STIMULANTS (except caffiene). This includes ephedrine, ritalin, any form of speed, extacy, etc. Have a couple drinks of alcohol (drink 'em if you've got them!) This makes it alot smoother.

    If you've got percocet, vicodin, or codeine pills, or syrup, laying around (any opiate, any opiate even tramadol!) TAKE THEM. It will be the most wonderful feeling you've had your entire life, BAR NONE-better than if you've ever done extacy, by far, no comparison.

    Its hard to explain what DXM is like, but if you like this low/moderate dose, then move up to two or three bottles to try (just once or twice to experience it).

    DXM is the greatest gateway to psychedelics ever (even though yes, I know it's not technically a psychedelic)... When your ready to try shrooms, etc, take your shrooms with a small dose of dxm, take your lsd with a small dose of dxm, (but avoid marijuana).. also great to mix, like i said, with alcohol, great with nitrous, and omgwonderful with opiates...

    I can't stress enough how much better almost every single drug is with dxm!!! It will increase the visuals from shrooms without decreasing the insight or screwing up motor functions. Decreases any anger you might get from alcohol. Removes tolerance you get from opiates. Makes weed about 5 times stronger (not for the faint of heart, I don't like weed and i hate this mix even more, it's far far too strong, even die hard weed people dont like it...it has a verrry strange effect when mixed with weed, literally makin it 5 times stronger at least)...

    Anyway, enjoy and gl! (you can get dxm powder off the net too, never attempt without a good scale if your a dxm n00b)

    --
    replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
    1. Re:DXM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Anyone hoping to try this out, please, please, please first read William White's DXM FAQ.

      I'm pretty liberal and I trip on some far-out things, but I heartily recommended that a friend kick his DXM habit.

      One really ought to know more about any drug before doing it. Read the "Major Risks" section in the FAQ.

    2. Re:DXM!!! by k4rm4_p0l7c3 · · Score: 1

      If you abuse DXM your liver will pay the consequences. Don't taunt death.. If you insist on being a tryptonaut then pick something that doesn't throw your body for such a loop.

      be smart- choose your drugs wisely. or else you will pay the consequences later in life.

    3. Re:DXM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please people, do not listen to what he says about DXM. I myself was a pretty heavy DXM junky for almost two years and I paid a price for it that I never could have imagined. Disassoctiative anesthetics can be, and are incredibly destructive to the human brain. Fairly recent research suggest that even moderate usage of below-anesthetic levels (i.e. recreational use) can cause signifigant brain damage.

      Some of the permanent effects I live with every day from my use are temporal lability (imagine still having all of your memories, but having no clue when they happened. This is extremely confusing and disorienting.), and severe cognitive repurcussions (My post-DXM adult IQ test was nearly 30 points lower. This is the hardest part to cope with).

      Extra absolutely does not have a clue what he is talking about. The other ingredient he is trying to warn you about is Chlorpheniramine Maleate, an acetylcholine inhibitor. It can cause you to bleed from mucous membranes, and causes your heart to race, and sometimes beat erratically. The dextromethorphan is no less dangerous though, it is just subtle.

      DO NOT MAKE MY MISTAKE! What started out as a seemingly harmless experiment has turned into the greatest regret of my life. Yes, I was stupid and paid the price. Please let me have paid it for you as well.

    4. Re:DXM!!! by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Bah, ketamine is better and far less dangerous than DXM. If you can get hold of it, it's a much better option.

  67. netcraft confirms: *SD is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in soviet russia, halucinogenics trip on YOU

  68. Read Stanislaw Grof's related works by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He was doing psychotheraputic research with LSD before the Feds decided the research was too dangerous to be continued: Seems there was a considerable loss to the world when this research was shutdown.

    Interesting fella, this Dr. Grof. He has a fine mind and doesn't mind sharing his thinking, whether purely speculative or simply scientific and so his other works are often worth reading as well.

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  69. DEAD ON THE MONEY by grendelkhan · · Score: 1

    DEAD ON THE MONEY

    I went in the bathroom to take a leak, stopped and looked into the mirror, and said "Why am I carrying around all the anger? Why do I hate myself so much? I really am a decent person." I flushed and walked out of the bathroom and I have felt better ever since.

    10 years of therapy for $10.
    --
    Wu-Tang Name: Half-Cut Skeleton Get your own Wu-Na
  70. its 6 not 12 for acid by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Acid gives the peek about 2-3hours after taking it, then its strong for a few more hours, but by the 6th hour you can feel it disapearing and your frame of mind is more coherent rather than loopy after 6hours, sure the physical effects are still quite strong, but your mind is back to 90% of its normal self or so (not like it was 3hrs earlier). So all up 12 hrs till theres barely 5% left of it, but 6-8hrs till your finishing your peak, then its tapering off.

    You could take 2 trips at once, mmmm :) though not wise to take 2hrs apart as it is not as strong as both at the same time.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:its 6 not 12 for acid by Suidae · · Score: 1

      You can always take more acid. It won't make the trip stronger, but it will make it longer (as a general rule).

      I once took 4 good blotter hits, tripped for about 5ish hours, then took 5 more and held that level for several more hours before falling asleep. The next day we went tubing on the river, and everything had a trippy look to it for the next 6 or 8 hours, for a total effective time of about 16 hours.

      I hate trying to sleep after acid.

  71. HPPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As a warning to anyone here who might be considering trying any psychedelic drugs, I'd like to mention HPPD, or Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder. It's a disorder with unknown causes, but is generally linked to the use of psychedelic drugs, LSD most strongly. Without describing it in too great detail, victims of the disease basically live out their lives without their "trip" ever ending; in the worst cases, the psychedelic effects one experienced while using the drug never cease.

    1. Re:HPPD by WebBORG · · Score: 0

      I got a more common name for this. Its called schizophrenia, and those who are prone, should NOT take psyhcadellics

    2. Re:HPPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had actually bothered to check out anything regarding the disorder (which you obviously haven't, seeing as how you couldn't even spell psychedelics properly to begin with), you would already know that it IS NOT schizophrenia. The people who have HPPD are fully coherent and functional, and recognize that their symptoms are not real -- a huge difference from a schizophrenic.

      Nothing wrong with a contrary point of view, but try to at least inform yourself about the subject before arguing about it.

    3. Re:HPPD by 5meodmt · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is related to schizophrenia. It's pretty well documented that hallucinogens can bring genetic tendencys to psychosis to the surface. But, yeah, I think most who have tripped a few times have experienced sober visuals.

  72. Forget the fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    See my earlier comment which got pushed down becuase I'm too stupid to know how to post to an early thread:
    Try Albert Hofmann's own book, LSD - My Problem Child [flashback.se], which has been available on the Web -- for free -- for about a decade already. It's also available here [cmu.edu] as a single text file.

    Much more interesting, exciting and enlightening.

    Posted anon because I'm no karma whore -- I'm a karma pimp. Check out my home page if you don't believe me.
  73. please don't proselytize LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God, man, don't say things like that. You shouldn't advocate universal LSD use. It is not a drug for everyone and even one bad trip can be seriously traumatic. I speak from experience when I say that after 5 years I still wish I had never tried the drug. I won't deny that this is because of my psychological make-up. In fact, that is exactly why it infuriates me whenever I see people like you recommending the drug. Some people have minds which should not and do not need to be opened. They're a small percentage, but its exactly this kind of hipster attitude that encourages the wrong people to try it, thinking it's going to be a wonderful experience.

    Tripping is not a necessary part of life. The only worthwhile conclusions and discoveries made are the ones which are arrived at through a coherent chain of events. It's fine if you find it an enjoyable form of recreation, but please allow people to form their own opinion on whether or not it's a good thing to do. Don't try to persuade into doing it those people who have a gut feeling that it's bad for them. It may bring people like you insight, but for some it can be shattering hours of agony that no one deserves to have to live through.

  74. Lick the window? by dekashizl · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't advocate licking things while tripping on LSD. It might seem like a good idea at the time, but the next day you might wake up with the realization that fire doesn't taste as good as you thought it would.

  75. psyche deli's by MichaelPublic · · Score: 1

    years ago, I took a great deal of LSD, shrooms, etc after 12 years of meditation I've found most of those states of mind are available without the drugs It was fun back then, though I don't miss the 10,000 inch long ants doing the congo line in vertigo inducing patterns on all available surfaces.....I wonder if they miss me?

  76. LSD's Legal Status? by Zen+Punk · · Score: 0

    I know that Lsyergic Acid Diathylamide is Schedule I(Illegal, in the same token as heroin and crack) in the United States, and I would venture to guess that it is illegal to posess except for research purposes in the U.K. as well, but does anyone know if LSD is legal in any nation? The Netherlands, perhaps? I know psilocybe mushrooms are legal there, and I can't imagine that LSD is signifiacantly more dangerous than those, albeit certainly more potent.

    --
    Sleep is futile.
  77. Weed is hardly a brain enhancer by damm0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sorry to crash your party, dude, but smoking marijuana is not going to improve your brain in any way. Just because people have been consuming it for a millenia doesn't mean it gets the "safe as water" stamp.

    Also, a rave is not where you will find unbiased information on the safety of the popular drugs. I for one would be curious for you to describe how the drugs you take improve your life and mind.

    1. Re:Weed is hardly a brain enhancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I write complex computer code at a very generous hourly rate. It all comes together so much more succinctly after a couple of bong hits! I've been doing it almost every day for 20 years and I still continue to see the benfits that marijuana smoking has for abstract thought.

    2. Re:Weed is hardly a brain enhancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get high almost every day then eventually you will start to think less clearly when you are not high. That doesn't mean that the bong hits are actually helping you think clearer than you would if you quit getting high every day.

    3. Re:Weed is hardly a brain enhancer by damm0 · · Score: 1

      You've been writing computer code stoned for 20 years?

    4. Re:Weed is hardly a brain enhancer by CentrX · · Score: 1

      You do agree that new experiences are beneficial to the human mind, right? And the altered consciousness from taking a drug can be one of the most novel and enlightening experiences that informs your perspective on the world even when not under the influence of the drug. As for the direct and temporary effects, I would not go so far as to say blankly that it "improves your brain" but rather that it opens doorways to different modes of thought that can make one more capable at doing certain things.

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
  78. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. TRY MUSHROOMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mushrooms are dirty. The high isn't nearly as clean as acid and I don't know what you mean by brain fry.

    I know a guy who OD'd on mushrooms one night. He went home, shit in his bed and tryed to fuck his mother. That's brain fry!

  79. UNIX and LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There are two major developments that have come out of Berkeley: BSD UNIX and LSD. This is not a coincidence." - Anon.

  80. Woah!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hang on there, pardner.

    I'm all in favor of giving the kids options to explore their horizons, but any suggestion that guzzling cough syrup will result in transcendental awareness . . . .

    I did an awful lot of hallucinogens in my day and I'd like to think I came out of it all with a greater awareness of myself and the world around me.

    But at the same time, I know more than a few people who were seeking transcendence in high school, and who may or may not have been able to understand your average /. post when they were 16 but certainly can't now.

    In short, I developed the feeling that naturally occuring substances are OK, particularly when they have a deep tradition of meditative and/or recreational use. Examples would be the rightous herb cannabis sativa/indica, the psilocybin mushroom, a truly amazing amazonian concoction called hiauaska, and good ol' C2H6O.

    If you really want a transcendental experience, brew your own beer, or better yet, grow your own dope.

    I will admit LSD opened some doors for me. I did it maybe a dozen times, but not for the last 10 years. Especially on the last few trips, it left me feeling dirty.

    Chemical drugs are bad, man, and that's it. Find a guy around 28-30 years old who did 'loads of E' back in the day, and you will have found an individual with greatly reduced cognitave abilites.

    We're all geeks here, right? I mean every second person here is boasting about how they got their digital toaster to run Gentoo.

    Then I don't see why you should be comparing different cough drop brands for their hallucinatory effects.

    You can compile (or write) your own damn OS, so brew your own, grow your own, or, if that's what you really get off on, synthesize your own. I'll be happy to drink and/or smoke with you, but I'll leave the pill-popping to those who really don't care what tomorrow brings.

    Besides, I'm pretty sure that DXM is proprietary. Alcohol and marijuana are most definitely GPL.

    Jah Love

  81. Re:Ah, LSD - Keep *your best friends* around by crem_d_genes · · Score: 1

    Like these (windows media player download)

  82. interesting book... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that I've dosed about 105 times while in college, I thought it was right on the money... And I'm proof positive that acid doesn't cause any permanent damage - I own my own business, and have three masters degrees..... I get up every day and work.

    Do I want to do acid again? No. But that's my choice. I have learned from it, but I just don't have the time anymore to spend 12 hrs trippin my balls off, and then 12 hours sleeping...

    I've seen walls breathe, heard colors, seen sound. I studied for a calc final while trippin (my roommate put some in my beer) and actually UNDERSTOOD where Newton was coming from. I had struggled with Calc all year long, and walked into that final (still trippin) took a 2 hour exam in about 20 minutes and aced the fucking thing...

    I made some incredible friends during that time - and we're still friends to this day 15 years later... All of us are successful in business and life... None of us have or will buy into that governmental bullshit about the stuff being bad for you...

    It opened my mind to new possibilities... Some still make me chuckle to this day:

    1) Every car has a "trip reset" button... It might work on that number thingy, but there's no way in hell it's going to stop your trip... I know. I've done the research, conducted about 500 trials, and it just has no effect :-)

    2) "Tie your shoes bobbie, or you'll trip...". (overheard in a grocery store)... Shit, and to think I paid $6... all I had to do was untie my shoelaces...

    3) Refrigerator lightbulbs are what actually make the refrigerator cold. Winter is caused by extraordinarily large refrigerator lightbulbs that were put into the street lights all over town... Walking underneath them could freeze you out...

    4) You *can* climb the walls if the hallway is narrow enough. Just don't shift your weight off the stud when you're 6' in the air...

    5) Playing frisbee in a cemetary while tripping tends to piss off mother nature... The ghosts didn't mind too much though...

    6) If you can't deal with the ghost of your dead grandmother crawling up your leg with a knife in her teeth (whether she's actually dead or not), then DON'T DO ACID....

    7) Bats can be knocked out of the air with Everclear fireballs...

    8) It doesn't matter how much alcohol you drink while trippin' - it's not going to affect you in the least...

    9) Giant crayola crayons make great swords at bars... They can even stop traffic!

    10) Everyone trips at The Pace...

    11) Thanks Lindy, for the 50 hits...

  83. Re: Flashbacks by Commander+Trollco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So these flashbacks are mostly visual? Perhaps they might not be caused by the LSD use at all. I have never done any true hallucinogen, yet visual artifacts are quite common for me, and I would expect that everyone gets them. They are usually just an "under the radar" thing, mentally. It might be that the user now associates the mind-generated visuals with the LSD experience, and is more likely to notice the otherwise-ignored noise. Disclaimer: Pot/Caffeine user, has also used alcohol, nicotine, lack of sleep

    --
    http://persianews.on.nimp.org/?u=Tar_Baby
  84. Well said, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After several years of experimentation with psychedelic substances, here is what I came to: these substances can help you discover who you really are.

    The problem: you must be quite strong and psychologically mature to be able to integrate this new knowledge about yourself into your everyday existence. If you are not, then at best, these memories about your (and the world's) deeper aspects will fade away and you can continue your everyday life as before.

    But if you are unlucky, you might get trapped here. You have glimpsed eternity, but the trip is over and you find yourself in this sad, closed state again... then you try to get back there, with drugs or any other way... but THAT never comes back, only the pseudo-realities which can be easily created by your imagination to filfull your wishes... you delude yourself without end...

    You may spend your entire life haunting that vision of beauty and perfection that you've experienced in the LSD state. If you don't find those who know what you are talking about, if you don't find somebody who can help you on the road to self-knowledge, then this single experience may bring you decades of despair and suffering.

    However difficult it becomes, you cannot just easily forget it because when you get to experience your true self in a psychedelic state, then your whole body/soul/mind is absolutely sure that this is TRUE. You feel it in each of your cells. This experience gets imprinted so deeply into your soul that you cannot possibly say later that it was not real. Even if you come to the conclusion that the drug may have only activated those areas of your brain which made you feel/think that this thing, that you've experienced is somehow deeply relevant (when in fact it may be not), this does not rewire the imprinting, if it is too deeply ingrained (which is definitely a possibility with psychedelics - you can reprogram your entire self).

    Here is my advice: think before you choose the red pill.

  85. Re:More information...(The "lowers IQ" part) by Commander+Trollco · · Score: 1

    Here's a little bit as it relates to music.
    Some of my jam buddies like pot alot, one of them enough to be considered a pothead. They can play pretty well while high. They also say they don't play as well, but I haven't noticed.
    I simply suck at playing music of any kind while high, buthave observed an interesting effect. The night after getting high (especially if it was a jam night), jazz improvisation comes easily, and is of a more coherent, flowing nature.
    This is just one person's experience, hardly a decent sample size, but it seems that marijuana can indeed have a positive effect on the mind.

    --
    http://persianews.on.nimp.org/?u=Tar_Baby
  86. Re: Flashbacks by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    No not always. And trust me tracers are NOT an under the radar thing. ever see a picture with a dozen or more 'echos' following it, like a strobe effect? kinda like that.
    Another thing that happens with flashbacks is shift in mental state, like what happens when tripping.
    Now not everyone in my experience has them. How many (indeed if) and how strong seems linked to usage, 1 hit once and I doubt you'll have any. but 2-4 hits 3-4 times a week for a year and your gonna see things melt in a flashback unless you have some natural resistance. They also tend to fade with time. I know of no counter-examples to them fading out, closest is a guy who used massively, used other drugs with, and got electroshock therapy during re-hab, so his case is a-typical and to complex to attribute effects clearly. It really seems to be very minor unless you use lsd fairly heavily, and personal chemistry has an effect.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  87. Re:More information...(The "lowers IQ" part) by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    Well when I say 'lowers IQ', it's more of a lose catch all phrase for what I see in my smoking friends and others.
    They clearly cannot think or reason as fast, and somtime not as clearly, as when sober. They also tend to lose track of what they're thinking.
    Now I've worked with people who swear they 'work harder' or 'work better' when high. I've found without exception this is self delusion. Usually they screw up more, go slower, and lose track of what thier doing. Best results I've seen is from people who've built up significant tolerance on 'just a ligh buzz' are only a little slower is all.
    That said it is great for improving apetite, reducing nausea, and relaxing someone. It's known to be mildly helpfull with glaucoma patients. It also has anti-siezure benifits that sometimes works for epileptics when nothing else will to prevent or reduce grand maul type siezures.
    And may have other benifits. At the very least it's benifit for chemo patients is worth the minor negatives.
    It's just that anytime someone tell me they do X better high I know thier full of it unless X is eat lots of nachos.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  88. Acid randomizes settings - which can be useful by igodard · · Score: 1

    Few of the deep insights bear close inspection, and it's *really* hard to bring deep-trip things back anyway. But the experience can still be useful anyway. An analogy: in the old days, loggers cut trees during winter and sledged them to stream banks with horses. Come the spring thaw the streams would flood, the logs would float, and downstream they'd go to the mill. However, the streams and rivers often had random rocks, and a log wold fetch up. Then the log behind that would fetch up on the first, and pretty soon you have a solid mass of intertwined logs running five miles upriver. These jams had to be unjammed to get the logs down, and it had to be done before falling water levels made it impossible until next year. The bigger mills had a set of jam experts on hire. The expert would travel to river and climb out on the jam with a peavey (a pole with a spike and hook for shifting logs around). He'd poke a little here, poke a little there, and find the one key log that was holding everything. Poke, shift, tie a rope around it and pull, and whoosh! - out goes the whole mess. The experts were paid *very* well. Smaller logging companies could not afford the experts. If they got a jam, their best logger would try to locate the key log and play expert. But if he couldn't, the fix was to bundle a couple of sticks of dynamite into a likely looking place in the pile. Kaboom! - and if lucky, whoosh!. If not, try a few more sticks somewhere else. The dynamite always blew a few logs to smithereens, and so the companies that could afford it used the experts instead of dynamite. But even the experts used explosives sometimes. The combination of skill and bang would unstick things, and that was what mattered. It's the same with acid in manny ways. We all get stuck inside on occasion - sometimes small jams, sometimes so big that the clear flow of our river of mind is completely blocked. Those that can afford an expert (a shrink, or guru, or whatever) or who have developed the skill themselves (meditation, revelation, or whatever) can do just fine without dynamite. For the rest of us, acid makes pretty good mental dynamite. Yes, it will smash a few logs, but the benefit of unblocking the mental and spiritual river is great. Of course, it doesn't offer much benefit when the river is flowing well anyway, so most people who go tripping seem to gradually cease after a while, except for an occasional "old time's sake". And it make lousy recreation - acid makes you look at what you've been working for years to not look at. Takes your person and life and reality itself and rubs your nose in it. But sooner or later you will meet your greatest fear, and your heart's desire. For most people, the heart's desire is the scarier. And always beautiful. Sometimes horribly beautiful, but always beautiful. Ivan

  89. wrt Erowid... by slashdaughter · · Score: 1

    In addition to hosting PIHKAL and TIHKAL, Erowid is the largest and broadest resource online for information relating to psychoactive plants and chemicals. I'm sure alot of folks reading this thread use erowid alot... I strongly encourage people to donate to keeping it alive and healthy.
    They put out an amazing newsletter for members - membership starts at $25 and donations of $200 or higher are currently being matched under a summer matching grant. Signed copies of the Shulgins' books are available at the $150 level.
    ---

    --
    "The U.S. Constitution - not perfect, but its better than what we have now"
  90. Ah, of course by pyth · · Score: 1

    Every druggie's dream: their drug accomplishing something besides a waste of time.

    1. Re:Ah, of course by 5meodmt · · Score: 1

      No. I think most 'druggies', or users of harder, anesthetic drugs do them TO waste their painful time on earth. Do you believe one can learn from near-death experiences? Read a little on the pineal gland and DMT. Guess what, at some time in your life before you die you will be a 'druggie'.

    2. Re:Ah, of course by Canar · · Score: 1

      You sure you don't know anybody for whom that statement may not be true?

  91. Oh please, spare us the Matrix bullshit. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I wish I could slap you at this very moment.

    No, I am not a violent person, but I believe you would come to realize there is somthing as reality once you feel the pain, see your blood driping on the floor and concentrate all your might on how to take revenge.

    All this preposterous pseudo pilosohpy is all great as an exercise for the imagination, but in practical terms is all bullshit. AT the end you have to eat, evacuate, reproduce if you possibly can, and perhaps think a bit, to eventually be a goner forever.

    All the rest is fluff, amuzing, but eventually completely useless.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Oh please, spare us the Matrix bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you and the rest of the 'philosophy is a tool for living life successfully' crowd go hang out on an Ayn Rand messageboard instead?

  92. Not me. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I find tremendously stupid to "enhance" reality by consistently trying to evade it.

    People that regularly take drugs just do not realize the damage and grief they cause around them and the danger on which they put themseves, like if life itself, on its unadultared rawness, did not offer enough highs (and lows) to keep good naked monkeys like us entertained.

    Having said this, I defend the right of any person to stone himself to death if that is his wish and if that does not put third parties at danger.

    War on drugs is the dumbest idea ever invented, and the sooner their implementors and promoters are unmasked and made jobeless, the better for all.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Not me. by misleb · · Score: 1
      I find tremendously stupid to "enhance" reality by consistently trying to evade it.

      What are you talking about? Have you ever used LSD? I live a "normal" life with a wife and a job. If my wife and I take LSD every once in a while, we are hardly evading reality.. certainly not "consistently." It is a very spriritual thing and I am somewhat insulted by your uneducated judgement.

      eople that regularly take drugs just do not realize the damage and grief they cause around them and the danger on which they put themseves

      Please make a distinction between those who actually abuse drugs and those who use them. Not everyone who uses drugs is causing damage and grief.

      Having said this, I defend the right of any person to stone himself to death if that is his wish and if that does not put third parties at danger.

      While I appreciate your respect for my rights, I don't respect your uneducated judgement about drugs and people who use them from time to time.

      War on drugs is the dumbest idea ever invented, and the sooner their implementors and promoters are unmasked and made jobeless, the better for all.

      Unfortunately, the war on drugs is not going end until people like you realize that not everyone who uses drugs recreationally and/or spiritually is "stoning themselves to death."

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  93. Which cultures? Cultures are myths. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Ther is not such thing as drug culture, or geek culture.

    The individuals that are pigeonholed on either are so diverse that to pretend they are an homogenous bunch of people is completely ridiculous.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  94. a Saying by dirt_puppy · · Score: 1

    A passage - I think its from "the Psychedelic Experience" - which I think fits the situation Choose someone willing to listen to you sing the same song over and over again, offkey with broken lyrics. Someone you won't mind seeing you, and who won't themselves mind seeing you, drool, or laugh, or cry, or piss your pants with fear, or talk to God. Someone who will hold your hand while you take a shit to keep you from falling in and getting flushed down the drain. Someone, perhaps, a little stronger than you physically. Definitely, someone who has tripped before, more than once. Someone who has stories to tell -- and things they won't say. Someone who seems to take it all seriously, but still has a sense of fun. Definitely, someone with some degree of compassion and, gosh darn it, Wisdom. Definitely, someone who won't leave you by yourself, even for a second. If you choose someone you might get sexual with, be sure they will accept a clumsy, giggling fool as a lover, and that they won't be offended if you can't perform or forget to. Someone that can keep cool and keep you cool if you get pushy. If you find anyone who meets all these criteria, consider marriage. Try to be worthy.

  95. LSD, Community, and Philosophy... by sgage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you are interested in how these inter-relate, you might be amused by Art Kleps' account of the Millbrook experiment in the 60's. It is quite informative, and hilarious at times. He can be a bit self-serving (and down right catty) in his take on the various personalities of the time, especially Leary, but even that is hilarious. Warning: Kleps was a nihilistic solipsist. Check it out!

    http://okneoac.com/table.html

    - Steve

  96. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. TRY MUSHROOMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Psilocybin and LSD work almost in almost identical ways on your brain, in fact they are cross tolerant. LSD lasts longer, and causes much more intense visuals. They're both tryptamines, if you want brain-fry, try disassociatives.

  97. MDMA.. by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    actually, MDMA was originally discovered and used as a Diet drug...

    They had to stop it because of the "problematic side effects"...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    1. Re:MDMA.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS on this.

      You do NOT know what you're talking about, kthx.

    2. Re:MDMA.. by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1
      --
      It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    3. Re:MDMA.. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Where it lay dormant for many years, until the early 70s when a friend sent Shulgin a copy of that patent, and Shulgin, noting its similarity to MDA, which was being used at the time by psychotherepists (and was all the rage with them), decided to make some MDMA.

      Soon it was MDMA that was all the rage in the psychothereputic community, and had replaced MDA pretty effectivly.

      (Of course right around that time LSD had been used in some practices since the 1950s, before it got associated with anti-government hippies and demonized, back when Carey grant could be shown on the cover of a major magazine proclaiming to have used LSD over 100 times)

      So yah, he didn't invent MDMA (though he did invent quite a few), but he did
      help in the rediscovery of it.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  98. Re:More information...(The "lowers IQ" part) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I completely agree that weed ruins your ability to concentrate (stay on 1 task) and work quickly.

    However, I do find that for some lateral/creative tasks my mind wanders over many possibilities and if I can keep them in my head long enough to remember to write them down, I find they are often from angles I wouldn't have thought of if not high. For instance pot interferes when writing low level code, but can sometimes help me break conceptual roadblocks when figuring out class relationships or other high level designs.

  99. God versus governments --- the supreme issue - by pensivemusic · · Score: 1

    now this is my kind of software. stupid governments.

  100. Storming Heaven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if i remember correctly the author is Jay Stevens. it is the most informative book on the post-hoffman history of lsd, and for that matter, psychedelic drugs.

    if you wish to pursue the research in another direction, there is a book that was co-authored by hoffman and richard schultjes, the ethno-botanist from harvard. it lists most of the psycho-active substances to be found in plants, as well as detailed chemical information.

    lastly, as many posters have commented on therapeutic uses, i suggest that you check out the work of stanislov grov (grof?), a hungarian psychologist who did much research in this area. i don't think his work received that much attention in the west.

  101. _mod parent up_ by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

    I've already posted in this discussion, so I'm moot for the job...even though I have points.

    DXM is an insidious drug. I've done it a handful of times, and while it's hallucinogneic abilities should not be diminished, taking it safely is far more complex than "make sure you get just DXM in your syrup."

    Beyond that, dosage titration is incredibly difficult. The mg/Kg ratio depends on a variety of factors...and the drug has contraindications with just about every type of chemical out there.

    Add in to that the fact that it routinely comes in formulas containing itself, acetominophen (tylenol--drink a 4oz bottle with that acetominophen inn it and there's a good chance you're dying 18 hours later...of a miserable type of toxicity....your organs will shut down one at a time, and you'll be there for the whole shebang), psuedoephedrine hCl (the synthetic--though more predictable, and arguably safer--form of ephedra. This will crank your heart up, and while even in very high doses (such as found in 1 4oz bottle) probably won't cause you much beyond a pounding heart, by it's nature makes you more prone for anxiety attacks...leading to panic attacks, etc...a bad time, at the least).....and then that still leaves the various maleates they put in there (depending on brand, locality, and popularity).....but let's not also forget Gueifennison.....an expectorant, which is put in there to help you cough stuff up. Well, if you drink alot of it, your able to cough shit up straight from your stomach. A horrible time, to say the least...

    DXM (dextromethorphanhydrobromide hcl) is seratonergically active....so it contraindicates with any SSRI or MAOI type antidepressant. (if you're on antidepressants, 90% chance it's one of these two types, or a closely related derivitive). Google for "seratonin syndrome" if you wanna see how you'll die (or live miserably) after that.

    It's also an Opoid...a synthetic opiate. I've heard that it was being tested for addiction therapy...

    It is also a disassociative anesthetic...most popular of which (ketamine, and dxm) have both been shown to cause vacuoles (micro perforations) in your brain. debate the merits of these findings all you wish--I care not to risk it

    Granted, the effects on the brain when administered in appropriate (and low) doses (usually by accident) are very interesting. It is not a fun drug. It isn't a bad experience, but, it's more intellectual than it is entertaining. That may equate to entertaining to you. YMMV The music enhancing effects it seemed to have around threshold doses were very nice, just as the FAQ told me it would be. But, at higher doses it became a terribly bizzare experience. Which, for that sake alone, was very entertaining...I'm wierd.

    But then we come to the negetive side effects. the racing heart....or the perception of it.....(I haven't hammered down what is is, but i'm sure its one of the two)....very bad. Cigarettes (as I'm a dedicated smoker) tasted like crap, and made me feel strange. I've theorized that it's the presence of small amounts of MAOI in cigarette smoke....but, I digress.

    It turned 3 hours into 3 days....it would take a though and endlessly reproduce it, as if an an infinite feedback loop. Just as the FAQ described. I would ordinarily credit the FAQ with colouring my experience...but if you've tried this drug you know that it isn't very likely. the FAQ documented it, and I reccomend it to anyone with any questions AT ALL about this drug. It's very matter of fact, and the interpretation of the data is--for the most part--left up to you.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm all for thorougly researching and then performing very stupid things in the name of personal psychological, chemical, and "psychonotical" experimentation and exploration...but, do some reading...

    Always be as safe and informed as you can in any situation, but in a situation as obviously precarious as this, at least be informed of the risks and reasons.

  102. Hardly by spiralx · · Score: 1
    As someone that's been taking acid and other hallucinogens and chemicals for almost 10 years now I completely disagree with what you've said. Taking acid will change your perception of reality, but that's it. Everything you've described can be attributed to the fact that hallucinogens give you an enhanced ability to notice patterns and connections - even between things that aren't there normally.

    You're noticing an increase in unlikely events occuring because your brain is capable of fitting a pattern to something that would normally be discarded, not because anything has actually changed.

  103. LSD & Reality by myke113 · · Score: 1

    Reality is a hallucination caused by the hallucinogenic, serotonin.

    --

    -Myke
    myke@compassionatecoalition.org
    http://www.compassionatecoalition.org
  104. Vacuoles by spiralx · · Score: 1

    Actually ketamine doesn't cause Olney's lesions most likely. While it has been observed to do so in rats it doesn't cause them in primates at all. Not sure about DXM but I know it's a lot more dangerous than ketamine is.

  105. Re: book. 5/10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a similar impression. Major questions in the book were left unanswered and unexplored, and characters were left undeveloped. The book ends at a point where it would seem to be about to get really interesting. The writing itself was certainly competent though, the prose felt like it flowed well, the dialogue was believable. I'd give it a 5/10 as well. It wasn't bad, but it was really that good either.

  106. Re: Flashbacks by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1
    I actually do get trails occasionally when I'm tired (and I know what the real thing looks like, so they are trails). It is possible to get them when not doing drugs.

    Also, I'm not an expert (or even knowledgable) on the subject. But I've heard it said that LSD flashback aren't chemical reactions, they're in the same vien as the flashbacks that war veterans have. Obviously LSD flashbacks aren't allways debilitating and emotionally destructive like war flashbacks are (although I suppose with a signifigantly bad trip they can be), but they are the same mental mechanism of your mind reliving an emotionally charged memory.

    But again, I'm not an expert, that's what I've been told. It seems plausable to me and came from a reliable source, but I'm not sure if it's 100% true or not.

    --
    The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
  107. LSD vs. 'Shrooms == Digital vs. Analog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm being a coward, and posting anonymously, as well. I seek the input of others who've dosed.

    I logged up about 30 acid trips in college, and am not too much worse for the wear. I'd say the odd occult near-disasters were a lot psychologically worse :0

    I only did 'shrooms twice, and didn't eat enough either time to get the full effect. I had to, a have a little further ... enhancement from certain other substances ;-)

    But one thing I noticed, was that there were a number of people who preferred 'shrooms to LSD, because they felt 'shrooming was a gentler drug, and felt more "analog" - more free-flowing, peaceful.

    LSD does have a digital feel: the feeling of perceptual clarity, of reality being That Much More, the way some songs or moods hit you is pristine, perfect and monadic. You feel that you are perceiving things and people Absolutely and Completely, feeling/analyzing/grokking them far faster and more completely than possible in a sober state. Little things happen so deeply that there is no way you could ever explain they way they effect you.

    LSD, I can say from experience, can be pretty rough. Strong doses make you sweat, make you shake, wire you like extremely strong coffee. And then there's the occasionally gas problem and the Shivers From Hell to deal with, the wave of cold that goes up or down your back. Then the visual hallucinations start. Many of mine, curiously, were pre-Columbian patterns. Hint: stucco ceilings are your friend ;-) Strangely, there is a deep silence to LSD. Except for my gang's music (the Pixies' _Doolittle_ (for getting started and peaking) and the _Last Temptation of Christ_ (around the quiet down and thinking and talking time) and Koyannisqatsi (anytime!) soundtracks were essential listening to my gang's trips) the visual s happened in a rather stately, peaceful silence.

    I believe it this kind of relentlessness that LSD has, which makes some people prefer 'shrooms. I found it takes about three to five trips for people to get control of themselves - the first few trips, they're floundering in the new ways their senses are operating. After that, they're pretty much fine for most minor social interactions. I've also found that people generally stop "learning" after 10 trips.

    Any 'shroom eaters have input?

    P.S.: Did anyone see the shadow-dudes while tripping? I'm being serious.

  108. Re:More information...(The "lowers IQ" part) by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    That's still alot better than I did. I already have add/adhd. I was lucky to be able to say three words in a row right.
    At best I was a drooler who had trouble looking at the wall.
    You can see why I gave up on it pretty quick.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  109. Re: Flashbacks by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    It's quite possible that explains the occurance of flashbacks, I honestly don't have a good explanation as to how they occur, only certain knowledge that they do.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  110. Ownzored by nickinho · · Score: 1

    Not only is the licence Similary to Cory Doctorow but the story itself bears a real resemblence to Ownzored

  111. I'd be honoured by fantomas · · Score: 1

    sir (I assume)

    I'd be honoured. Glad to make you smile. Good luck with your publication and good for you taking the risk and using the creative commons licence. I hope it works out well for you.

    -- sir fantomas the digitally meandering

  112. LSD is a healer and a teacher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've taken LSD perhaps a dozen times, and each time the drug has tought me a valuable lesson. I can honestly say that I don't believe I could even take LSD and have a purely recreational experience. Nor have I had any bad trips or discomforting moments during the experience that didn't directly serve to teach me something valuable about myself.

    LSD has enabled me to understand my depression, restructure my priorities, improve my relationship with my parents, have more empathy for other people, and tought me how to have fun in life.

    These are all lasting effects.

    LSD will desocialize you and allow you to see beyond the contructs of modern culture. When all this is stripped away it is much easier to see what it really means to be a human being.

    When I see people on this board use words like "druggies" and condescending language to refer to people who have tried LSD, I am saddened by the ignorance. If you have no interest in trying it / If you are satisfied with your knowledge of yourself and the greater workings of the universe / If you are reluctant to try it for whatever reason: Fine.

    Personally I believe being able to act as a human being is a blessing. Besides, even if LSD had no value besides getting high and having a good time, what's the harm in that?

    It just so happens that the value is immeasureable for many people.