Slashdot Mirror


The Traveling Salesman Problem Meets Starbucks

Call Me Black Cloud writes "John 'Winter' Smith, a contract computer programmer, is living the traveling salesman problem. His personal quest is to visit every company-owned Starbucks and he's not doing too badly. After 7 years he's hit over 4,000 locations in the United States and 167 in Britain and Japan. What motivates him? That's one for the professionals to answer, but since Starbucks opens an average of 10 stores per week it doesn't look like Winter will be stopping any time soon. His website offers insight into why he does this ('to be different') and has pictures of the 4000+ Starbucks he's visited."

499 comments

  1. Statistics.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This should be interesting...

    Before Slashdot = 60,293 visitors since December 2003.

    After Slashdot today = 90,000+ (estimated)? Any takers?

    1. Re:Statistics.... by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      Ah yes... Using the /. effect to inflate web statistics. Ego stroking? Never!

    2. Re:Statistics.... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's amazing how many people are interested in substandard quality products ala Starbucks.

      Do you believe you have tasted coffe after visitng a Starbucks? A better description of their products would be dishwasher-water!

      Long Live Jamaican Blue Mountain!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    3. Re:Statistics.... by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      FYI FWIW: Almost exactly 12 hours later, the hit counter says 93,474 ... so the estimate of 90,000 from the patent/first post AC was pretty darn close. BTW, when my christmas lights got slashdotted, I recorded 20,864 referrals from 16,907 unique IP addresses, so given that he had 60,293 before today, this is also in the ballpark with what I observed - read more about the Slashdot Effect on Christmas Lights for those interested.

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  2. How does one make a living... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    when constantly assaulted by coffee craps?

    One of the great unanswered questions.

    1. Re:How does one make a living... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's a computer programmer. Therefore, he's powered by caffeine. Without it he does not function.

    2. Re:How does one make a living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What I can't understand is how can he sleep in his car every night? If I was drinking coffee like he was, I'd be having the LiquiShits (TM) for sure!

    3. Re:How does one make a living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      coffee craps

      If this is some new game I can find in Vegas, I'm all in!

    4. Re:How does one make a living... by krough · · Score: 1

      "That's one for the professionals to answer, but since Starbucks opens an average of 10 stores per week it doesn't look like Winter will be stopping any time soon." ...he probably also has sudden urges to play Whack-A-Mole.

    5. Re:How does one make a living... by david.given · · Score: 4, Funny
      He's a computer programmer. Therefore, he's powered by caffeine. Without it he does not function.

      It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that the mind acquires speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking is a warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion...

    6. Re:How does one make a living... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      easy - many people do their best thinking in the John.

    7. Re:How does one make a living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is this a story for slashdot? News for nerds? How is this relevant to ANYTHING, WHO THE HELL CARES. So why not next post a story about him visitign all the pep boys in the world, whats the relevance?

    8. Re:How does one make a living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frank Herbert? Is that you?

    9. Re:How does one make a living... by Eq+7-2521 · · Score: 1

      The quote from which that was paraphrased actually originated with the 1984 film version of _Dune_ by David Lynch. http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sf/dune-faq/part1/ - "4.10 What is the Mentat Mantra". AFAIK, Frank Herbert had nothing to do with it.

      --
      At my age I find coming up with a witty signature too exhausting.
    10. Re:How does one make a living... by Phleg · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that the mind acquires speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking is a warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion...

      I saw the words "Java" and "speed" in your post, and almost modded you as a troll. That is, until I noticed you were talking about coffee.

      --
      No comment.
    11. Re:How does one make a living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I saw the words "Java" and "speed" in your post, and almost modded you as a troll"

      You "saw" the words? Have you ever tried reading? Christ, it's not as if you have thousands of mod points to use up; you do have time to read, comprehend and reflect upon whether a post is worth modding.

      No wonder the moderation system is shot to hell. Evidently, there are certain moderators who simply screen-scrape for certain words.

    12. Re:How does one make a living... by Cili · · Score: 1

      Most people actually *see* the (small)words. You don't read the word "read", you simply recognize it visually. It's no longer a stream of letters, it's just a litle image. But it's obvious you were trolling...

    13. Re:How does one make a living... by Phleg · · Score: 1

      It's called a joke.

      No, really.

      --
      No comment.
  3. Coffe Connection by khrtt · · Score: 1

    Starbuks travels way to fast for my taste already. I want my Coffee Connection corner shop back!!

    1. Re:Coffe Connection by ipxodi · · Score: 1

      Oh thank god, someone else that remembers the fantastic Coffee Connection shops.
      East Coast roasted coffee beans rock -- not those burned, nasty-tasting cinders they use at Charbucks.

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
  4. 10 stores a week by strictnein · · Score: 2, Funny

    10 * 52 * 100

    in 2104 we'll have over, what, 58-60,000 starbucks?

    YES!

    1. Re:10 stores a week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all of which will be in Seattle.

    2. Re:10 stores a week by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      and some shut down... its a franchise, not all of them make sufficient money... and wheres the 100 from? 520 a year, has it been growing at that rate for 100 years?

    3. Re:10 stores a week by strictnein · · Score: 1

      and wheres the 100 from?

      Notice how I mention 2104. That's a 100 years from now.

      So, 10 new stores/week * 52 weeks/year * 100 years = 52,000 stores (my units cancel out nicely)

    4. Re:10 stores a week by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually from what I've seen and read most are not franchises. Starbucks owns the majority of the stores, unless they are a kiosk inside another retailer (Safeway or Barnes & Noble for example.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    5. Re:10 stores a week by EvanED · · Score: 4, Funny
      since Starbucks opens an average of 10 stores per week it doesn't look like Winter will be stopping any time soon.

      This reminds me of Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged:

      This was the point at which he conceived his purpose, the thing that would drive him on, and which, as far as he could see, would drive him on forever. It was this.
      He would insult the universe.
      That is, he would insulct everybody in it. Individually, personally, one by one, and (this was the thing he really decidid to grit his teeth over) in alphabetical order.
      When people protested to him, as they sometimes had, thta the plan was not merely misguided but actually impossible because of the number of people being born and dying all the time, he would merely fix them with a steely look and say, 'A man can dream, can't he?'"


      (Life, the Universe and Ev8hing)
    6. Re:10 stores a week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're a jerk, EvanED. A real kneebiter.

    7. Re:10 stores a week by larkost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was more reminded of the shoe stores from the radio scripts.

    8. Re:10 stores a week by stilwebm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      unless they are a kiosk inside another retailer (Safeway or Barnes & Noble for example.

      Those are also not franchises. They just sell Starbucks coffee products exclusively, but are owned by the parent store. Starbucks only gets the profits from volume sales of coffee to these resellers, just like selling to a grocery story.

    9. Re:10 stores a week by donutz · · Score: 1

      Actually, that brings an interesting thought to my mind. How many Starbucks locations have failed, shut their doors? Not counting situations where a Starbucks moves from one spot to a nearby one, of course.

      Have any Starbucks locations gone out of business? Or will the overcaffeination of America continue its march into the future unhindered?

    10. Re:10 stores a week by slim-t · · Score: 1
      Have any Starbucks locations gone out of business? Or will the overcaffeination of America continue its march into the future unhindered?

      His site says he has been to 39 stores which have since closed.

      In searching his site I discovered that the Starbucks I took a picture of in Seattle on the wild guess that it was the first Starbucks ever... was indeed the first Starbucks.

    11. Re:10 stores a week by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1
      I am still kicking myself. Starbucks had a handful of stores in Seattle and some snobs out there liked them over the other local chains. I thought...what's the big deal? They overroast their beans, the choco treats weren't as good as my favorite shop...

      I guess that was one IPO I should have jumped onto!

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    12. Re:10 stores a week by DreamerFi · · Score: 1

      In 1977 there were 150 Elvis impersonators. By 1999 there were 35,000. If this rate of growth continues, by the year 2019, more than one third of the world's population will be Elvis impersonators

    13. Re:10 stores a week by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      im sorry, i didnt realise, i try not to pay too much attention to starbucks, i cant stand their coffee though i can respect them as a business... they seem to be doing more than well enough

    14. Re:10 stores a week by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      my bad... need to learn to read... come to think of it a hundred thousand stores by then doesnt seem unlikely dont you think? lets say the worlds population roughly stabalises at 10 billion, 10,000,000,000/100,000 = 10,000 people per store, which i think is viable for a coffee shop, world domination assumed obviously

  5. I wonder what other folks have done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Visit every McDonalds? Install every Linux distribution? So many possibilities.

    1. Re:I wonder what other folks have done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to pee in every urinal on Earth. I better start drinking more ...

    2. Re:I wonder what other folks have done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Install every Linux distribution?

      That's impossible. The Slackware install would take up most of your life.

    3. Re:I wonder what other folks have done this? by Malnathor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Store every piece of their navel lint.

      http://www.feargod.net/fluff.html

      Really.

    4. Re:I wonder what other folks have done this? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I've clipped every fingernail on my body. Not many other people have had such a grand oppertunity. In fact, I think the only other person would have been my mother, but that would have been when I was a little tike.

    5. Re:I wonder what other folks have done this? by HFXPro · · Score: 1

      I think you have confused Slackware with Gentoo. Oh wait Gentoo takes more then a lifetime. Never mind. Carry on.

      --
      Reserved Word.
    6. Re:I wonder what other folks have done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what this guy is doing.

  6. I hope he's left a pheromone trail... by tcopeland · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...then we can follow his lead a la ant algorithms.

    1. Re:I hope he's left a pheromone trail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps you haven't been in public lately, but human pheromone trails don't tend to be pleasent, nor do they encurage people to follow them.

      -Joe 2-Keg
      try the 70 bean-onion soup, just please, don't stay for dessert if you do.

  7. Venti me? by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just wondering if he's been keeping track of the health effects of going to Starbuck's so offten...

    1. Re:Venti me? by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Just wondering if he's been keeping track of the health effects of going to Starbuck's so offten...

      Maybe he read about the benefits...

      Coffee is good!

      Though the virtues of coffee drinking may have been debated in the past, now there appear to be new reasons to rejoice over java. More and more studies have linked coffee consumption to a number of health benefits, including a reduced risk of diabetes, Parkinson's disease, gallstones, colon cancer and potentially heart disease.

      "Coffee has much more in it than caffeine," said Dr. PeMartin, director of the Vanderbilt University's Institute for Coffee Studies, which conducts medical research on coffee and is funded by a grant from a consortium of coffee-producing countries. "It's a very complex beverage that contains hundreds of compounds, including many with antioxidant effects."

      Though the tea industry has been touting its antioxidants, turns out coffee may contain even more--specifically polyphenols. One of the most potent antioxidants in coffee is called chlorogenic acid, which is partially responsible for the coffee flavor. Some reports estimate that more than 850 compounds are packed inside the humble bean.
      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:Venti me? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Coffee may be good, but that's not necessarily all you get at Starbucks. For example:

      The sweet, summery frozen drinks can be even more tempting - and sinful. The largest Java Chip Frappuccino weighs in at 650 calories - 50 calories more than a Big Mac - and contains 25 grams of fat, compared with 33 grams for the Big Mac.
    3. Re:Venti me? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, he could log all his washroom stops as well. (No thanks, the pictures are not necessary!)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Venti me? by bandy · · Score: 1

      Glad to see that I'm not the only one who thought of that. I suppose if he watched his diet carefully, he'd do alright.

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    5. Re:Venti me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they use heavy cream. Who would'a guessed?

    6. Re:Venti me? by Aerog · · Score: 1

      There are no adverse effects from coffee.

      However, a friend of mine was once refused service at Starbucks because apparently she had had "more than the legal limit of caffeine" that day. Seems they are at least concerned about our health!

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
    7. Re:Venti me? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      I don't know of any legal limit on caffeine consumption, but it is known that there is a point where you can fatally overdose on caffeine.

    8. Re:Venti me? by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1

      Judging by evidence such as this, I think the health effects speak for themselves...

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  8. Four bucks a cup! by niko9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Among the paramedics at work they are known as Fourbucks, on acount of their prices. ;P

    1. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. Why some people pay that kind of money for coffee is beyond me. This guy must have a wealthy benefactor or something.

      The only coffee product I drink is 'plain black coffee', so needless to say I don't stop in their establishments very often, but occasionally when in an airport, or walking around Manhattan. What really irks me about Starbucks though is how irritated they seem when I order a small (or whatever size that equates to in starbucks land), black, coffee.

      Starbucks runs all of the small coffee shops out of town, and then gets irritated when I want to order something that these small shops easily provided. What kind of business model is that. Doesn't anyone in this world drink regular coffee anymore!

    2. Re:Four bucks a cup! by bluekanoodle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think it takes a wealthy benefactor to drink a cup of starbucks coffee. After all, that's cheaper then a pack of cigarettes, and that has never stopped people (predominantly lower income) from smoking.

    3. Re:Four bucks a cup! by ehiris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Starbucks doesn't sell coffee. They sell you a short escape from your regular life. Coffee included.

    4. Re:Four bucks a cup! by AnonymousKev · · Score: 1
      Doesn't anyone in this world drink regular coffee anymore

      I wonder the same thing! On a couple of occasions, I've bought Starbucks' house coffee and it tasted hyper-burnt. I'll put up with that from a 75-cent/cup diner, but not from a $2.50/cup Trendy Retail Chain.

      All of their other hot-candy-bar-in-a-cup offerings taste pretty good -- for a dessert! But in the morning, I want caffine, not sugar.

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    5. Re:Four bucks a cup! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A cup of coffee lasts you about fifteen minutes (then it gets cold, or it gets consumed.) Even a serious smoker rarely smokes more than a pack a day. Personally, I smoke about a pack a week... And I make coffee at home my damn self. Hint to the coffee addicts: a stainless steel vacuum thermos will keep your coffee hot for two days. You can reasonably expect it to stay hot for eight hours even if you're opening the thermos occasionally.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Four bucks a cup! by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      he asks for the coffee for free - half-fill his old cup. The coffee isn't what costs him, its the opportunity cost of wasting all that time, and the cost of the gas, that are the real expenses.

    7. Re:Four bucks a cup! by GoofyBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >What really irks me about Starbucks though is how irritated they seem when I order a small

      How do they display this "irritation"?

      You know that the guy serving you doesn't give a care what you buy since he gets paid by the hour regardless of what you order? In fact, he might be happy that you have such a simple order since it doesn't involve alot of work or thinking.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    8. Re:Four bucks a cup! by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why some people pay that kind of money for coffee is beyond me.

      Especially when you consider that all Starcruds "coffee" is over-roasted, burnt and bitter. The one thing they've ever done right is the snow job they've done in persuading people that badly-made coffee is the best thing they've ever tasted. If the average Starbucks customer ever tasted Gevalia, they'd never go back again, but Starbucks is trading on their ignorance. I guess it just goes to show how easy it is to fool people and how little most people know about how coffee's supposed to taste. Of course, most of those people probably still think percolators make good coffee.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Glog · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is the lamest statement from a corporate lapdog I heard in a while.

    10. Re:Four bucks a cup! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1
      I can't believe I'm defending "The Man", but here goes:

      I order a small (tall, ok the naming is stupid) black coffee about 3 times a week from starbucks. For the last 10 years. And I have never once been given any attitude. In fact, a couple times my coffee was free because there was a delay while they made a fresh pot. Oh, and the coffee is not $4.00, it's like $1.35. Four bucks gets you a venti mocha frappa whatsits with whip cream, which I never order. And as others have pointed out, if people didn't go the stores they wouldnt be opening them.

    11. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Corbets · · Score: 1

      Either that, or you've been fooled by how Gevalia is supposed to taste. I know people that got used to Hills Bros or McDonalds coffee and don't like Starbucks because it's different from what they're used to.

      I for one HAVE drank Gevalia (along with many many others) and I prefer Starbucks. It's a matter of taste, not a matter of fact. :)

    12. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wealthy benefactor... He simply doesn't pay for his coffee at all -- per the article (http://www.fortune.com/fortune/thisjustin/0,15704 ,657936,00.html?cnn=yes, just like it is in the summary) he goes into a store, tells them his deal, and says that he has to drink something there for it to count. He then asks for a half cup of complimentary coffee, and they oblige.

      That's all...

    13. Re:Four bucks a cup! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I hated Starbucks long before I first encountered Gevalia. I've also used a number of different Gevalia blends over the years. Last week I was part of a hotel walkthrough for a local convention, and at the end, we were in a conference room with coffee and tea service. I took a cup of coffee, put my normal ammount of sugar in it and it was still quite bitter. Checking later, the hotel serves only Starbucks. I couldn't have been predjudiced by knowing what the coffee was because I didn't find out until later. All I knew was it was bitter. Almost everybody I know that knows good coffee agrees with me that Starbucks isn't good. You may like it, YMMV, but just looking at the beans should tell you they're over-roasted.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    14. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can buy a machine like this Automatic Espresso Machine. It has upfront costs but you can make your own espresso (with as many shots are you want) for MUCH less than Starbucks or your local coffee house.

      Here are some rough calculations:
      espresso machine $550.00
      lb coffee beans $4.00
      shots per lbs 84
      milk per gallon $3.60
      latte's per gallon 24 (1.5 deciliters per shot)
      starbucks venti latte $2.50

      home latte cost per day (venti w/ one shot) $0.20

      espresso machine cost per day for a year (incl ingredients) $1.70
      Starbucks latte cost first year $912.50
      home latte cost first year incl. machine $622.13

      home latte cost second year $912.50
      home latte cost second year $72.13

      home latte total after 2 years $1,825.00
      home latte total after 2 years $694.26
      A beer a day for a year: $3,832.50

      And it means you can make delicious things like Irish Coffee

    15. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhhuh... Gevalia?
      It landed here in Finland few years back. The TV commercial catch-phrase was something like: "Coffee you could offer to your guests" -- Often with a storyline where someone crashed into your home in an unexpected situation.
      Which was much joked as meaning "You wouldn't offer your GOOD coffee to uninvited guests now would you? So keep a pack of this horrible shit in the cupboard just incase."

      And personally. I hate it...
      These are my choises of coffee:
      Presidentti and Juhlamokka (Sorry, I couldn't fina a link for the latter)

      And yes, I feel qualified to comment on quality coffee ;)

    16. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      I think you've underestimated the addictive capacities of most smokers. A pack a day ?
      I knew one woman who would buy two packs of 50 (yes, in Australia, you can get 50 cigarettes in one pack) at one time. That was at seven in the morning. By late afternoon some days, she'd be back there buying more.

      Admittedly that was extreme, but to say "a serious smoker rarely smokes more than a pack a day" isn't exactly representative.

    17. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Yewbert · · Score: 1
      I wonder the same thing! On a couple of occasions, I've bought Starbucks' house coffee and it tasted hyper-burnt.

      I usually notice that about Starbucks -- not that I drink their coffee more than once or twice a year. I just don't like it that much, for exactly that reason, as well as that it's overpriced.

      For my money, Douwe-Egbert's red-bag blend ( www.bestcoffeebymail.com ) is the best coffee in existence - it's smooth and mellow while still being full-bodied and man-enough to stand up to serious additives (turbinado sugar, dairy products, Bailey's, carpet fuzz, paper clips, shards of glass).

      Back to the article - this guy's a tool. There've got to be more interesting chainstores to visit worldwide.

    18. Re:Four bucks a cup! by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry you didn't like Gevalia, but not everybody's going to like the same thing. I'm sure you're qualified, and I see that you have interesting tastes. I note that you don't list Starbucks as a favorite, and wonder what you think of it. BTW, do you know why Scandinavians are such big coffee drinkers? I've often wondered but never knew the right person to ask. I doubt that the weather's the only reason, as Russians, among others with hard winters don't drink that much.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    19. Re:Four bucks a cup! by defile · · Score: 1

      And somehow Starbucks always manages to hire the cutest girls. I think part of their job description is to be flirty.

      I've probably ordered complicated drinks just so I have an excuse to stay there longer and hope that they'll pay more attention to me.

      Guys are so stupid. :(

    20. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Yewbert · · Score: 1

      To everyone in this sub-thread, I humbly suggest you seek out and try Douwe-Egbert's brand. I have the same distaste for Starbuck's, like Gevalia just fine in general, and to my taste-buds, D-E is significantly better than any Gevalia blend I've tried. The red-bag "full-aroma" blend is smooth, smooth, SMOOTH even at high strengths, without any bitterness or burnt taste at all. I'm not affiliated with www.bestcoffeebymail.com in any way, other than being happy with their service, and knowing that they're the first online place I could find to buy Douwe-Egbert's.

    21. Re:Four bucks a cup! by birder · · Score: 1

      Same goes for beer. The swill most people drink and call good beer really makes you wonder. I drink big brewery beer from time to time but I know a good beer when I taste one where sadly a lot of others can't accept the taste.

    22. Re:Four bucks a cup! by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      This is the lamest statement from a cynical /.-er I heard in a while.

    23. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Jorj+X.+McKie · · Score: 1

      Where do you buy your beer? At $10.50 apiece, I think that you're being cheated.

      The Preview button is your friend.

      --
      I remember your eyes, on the twelfth of July...
    24. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I find most of the Gevalia offerings to be good but not excellent, with the exception of the new Peruvian Organic beans. It is the best coffee I have had, bar none.

      I like Starbucks for a change. I can't drink it every day, but it has a unique taste that I like every now and then. Probably the best thing they have going for them is that they actually serve HOT coffee, which is something you can't get anywhere else right now.

      Oh, as a word of advice, avoid the Starbucks french roast. "French roast" is a euphimisim for "burned". As others have noted, Starbucks roasts their beans to the limit on even their "light" roasts. Their french roast tastes like a pile of ashes.

    25. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 1, Troll

      Typically by looking very surprised and displaying facial expressions like I'm wasting their time. Or they might ask 'what' like they didn't hear me or thought I made a mistake in my incredibly simple order. Occasionally, I've also been pressed to order a bigger size, although they don't usually do this if they are busy (I assume because they know there is a bigger sale standing right behind me in line).

      Looking back over what I typed, that doesn't seem as bad as I made it out to be. I guess that the employees display a sense of haughtiness towards my order that disturbs me ('We're too good for just coffee...')

    26. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 1
      And I have never once been given any attitude. In fact, a couple times my coffee was free because there was a delay while they made a fresh pot. Oh, and the coffee is not $4.00, it's like $1.35.

      Well, my coffee has never been free. But the fact that they had to make a fresh pot for you shows how little regular coffee they sell. And yes, you're right, the coffee is not $4.00, but in NY I pay close to $2, which is a bit extreme.

      Another grip that I didn't mention earlier is that they claim to be a coffee shop, yet only have one type of coffee brewed (and in your case, it sounds like none at all...). I would like to be able make a selection at a coffee shop. Even if it is only 4 or 5 different roasts or varietals. There used to be a coffee shop in my home town that had a good dozen different brews ready to go at any given time.

    27. Re:Four bucks a cup! by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Ok, the upsell is a training technique... drilled into minimum wage foodservice types.

      The shocked look is because it is so rare that someone orders a small black coffee. and if that was what I wanted, I wouldn't get it from starbucks.. for 2.50, I'd get it at McRonalds for .75.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    28. Re:Four bucks a cup! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Agreed, although Starbucks usually does have both a "dark" and "light" brew available. One of the local shops will grind you whatever you want and give you a french press, which is definately superior. I would go there more often, but its too darn smokey. Which is another thing in Starbucks favor - they are all non-smoking. (Not an issue, I guess, for folks in no smoking states like CA and NY)

    29. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      I have not been impressed with Gevalia. My girlfriend used to get that, and I never really liked it that much (but of course drank it and didn't say a word). Actually, my preferred coffee is 100% pure Kona. But that's a little expensive for everyday drinking, so I'm usually quite happy with a pure Costa Rican or Guatemalan. In general I think I'll drink anything without complaining as long as it's not a blend or been flavored.

    30. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree. I recently quit smoking and my consumption rate with one 20-count pack a day. I was not unusual. I was the average. The size of the pack is based on the average consumption, because of convenience. You grab one pack in the morning and it lasts you all day (or at least until you get home for the evening). Hmmm, do Australians might smoke more on average?

      There is a big difference between what the real average is, and what the non-smoker thinks it is. When people asked how much I smoked they were usually surprised by my answer. They expected me, as an average smoker, to consume a lot more. The non-smoker wants the average to be higher. They want to make smokers more nasty, evil, addicted and out of control than they really are. This isn't hard to understand, non-marijuana users do the same to pot smokers, calling them "potheads" and imagining them continually stoned throughout the day, when in fact they smoke only a couple joints a day.

      It's also easier to recognize heavier smokers as being smokers. They smoke more so you are more likely to recognize them as smokers. They are also more likely to annoy you, so they stick in your mind. So when you run across someone chain smoking five packs a day, you subconsciously bookmark that person as the average.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    31. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 1
      (Not an issue, I guess, for folks in no smoking states like CA and NY)

      Ahh, it's a beautiful thing to no longer have to consider air quality when entering a resturant.

    32. Re:Four bucks a cup! by ghost_world · · Score: 1

      Roasting is just a part of the process of making coffee, and I prefer the rich/bitter taste of "over-roasted" coffee (French/Viennese roast). Unfortunately, I still do not like Starbucks regular coffee... And I don't really like Gevalia either. For anyone like me, I'd suggest ordering an Americano (espresso with hot water). The espresso tastes much better than the regular coffee, and adding water makes it last longer.

      I used to hate Starbucks not just for the coffee, but also because I thought they were putting independant coffee houses out of business, but that's just an urban legend. Their real effect is quite the opposite. Here is an interesting article on the subject.

    33. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 1
      if that was what I wanted, I wouldn't get it from starbucks

      And I usually don't. I only venture in the place a few times a year, and usually not by choice (ie. drug in by friends).

      I wouldn't complain at all if Starbucks hadn't run so many small coffee shops out of business. But it is so very rare that I find a place where I can satisfy my fix without requiring a bank loan...

      And if you're drinking a lot of McD's coffee, I hope you have good health insurance.

    34. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's understandable that you don't got to Starbucks if all you want is plain black coffee. When I just want plain coffee I don't go to Starbucks either. But I do get the craving for a cappucinno once in awhile (I love foamed milk), so when I do I go to Starbucks.

    35. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the same experience. Cream and sugar ruin coffee, you can't tast it once you've added all that garbage. So I go to order a tall cup of regular coffee and sure enough, the sales person looks at me like I just crawled out from under a particularly loathsum rock.

      I like the coffee, not the lifestyle.

    36. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what's with it. But it is somehow mandatory to offer coffee whenever someone comes to visit.
      And to have after lunch... And dinner... And with morning paper... And whenever having a cigarette... And when reading some manual or what have you... I guess you get the idea ;P

      I actually have never tried starbucks. There isn't one here in Tampere. I couldn't find one in Helsinki either with quick googling. I'm not sure if we actually have a single starbucks in Finland :P Locator didn't list Finland either. Might be that they have hard time selling here because coffee is offered in practically every store which sells anything food related. 1 euro for your bog standard cup of coffee.

      Yup, different tastes. My father used to buy his coffee from a small shop which hand ground and mixed to your specification or preferred 'style'. He then chucked a spanish one-cup espresso cooker full of that strong roast and out came some hideous stuff that resembled used motor oil. Didn't need to drink more than a spoonfull of that to keep awake thou :P

    37. Re:Four bucks a cup! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      A cup of coffee lasts you about fifteen minutes (then it gets cold, or it gets consumed.)

      That's why you use a coffee warmer (something like this, or maybe even this, but I'm not sure if that last one is a real product or a joke) to keep it from going cold. I brew four cups in the morning and take a couple or three hours to go through it instead of trying to chug it.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    38. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Last time I ordered a coffee from Starbucks, actually it was the first time as well, I paid two dollars for an espresso. They give me the espresso in an 16 ounce paper cup. Huh? While I wasn't expecting a porcelain demitasse, I as expecting a much much smaller cup.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    39. Re:Four bucks a cup! by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Actually I brew my own, Millstone is the brand my Grocery store carries, But in a pinch, fast food coffee is serviceable.

      Why would I need health insurance?? because they serve coffee at the recommended temperature?

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    40. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      Well, one sentence in the article you point to really irritates me... Of course, Starbucks' homogeneity is the secret to its success; whereas local coffee shops can be inconsistent with their products, automation and training ensure that at Starbucks, you'll get the exact same latte every time, anywhere in the world.

      Who wants the same thing all the time? Thats nuts! Its no different than not always drinking the same beer, or trying a different bottle of wine. Variety is good. Coffee-shop coffee should not be like a fast food chain where you get the same thing everytime. It's supposed to be a learning experience. If I wanted the same thing everytime, I'd just get my coffee at the grocery store or the local diner.

    41. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you? Some kind of communist? How do you get "corporate lapdog" out of what was said? Moron.

    42. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more like 'because it's so acid filled it will give you an ulcer'. But the hot thing is a good point too. I prefer my coffee cooled down so it is just slightly warm. I think that way you can best experience the flavor. Granted, that's probably not something you want to do with McDonald's coffee.

    43. Re:Four bucks a cup! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Kona is, of course, wonderful! I used to drink it all the time when my ship was home-ported at Pearl Harbour. At one point, I had a reseller's permit, and found a place where I could buy it wholesale. I've heard that Jamaica Blue Mountain is even better, but I've never run across it. I won't say Gevalia is the best in the world, but it's what I drink at home, and I offered it as an example of what I think is good, so that people could judge my tastes.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    44. Re:Four bucks a cup! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I don't find French style over-roasted, just roasted longer than American blends. Done right it can be quite good. Gevalia makes a good espresso blend, and even the regular blends make a good espresso. Again, the best coffee is the one you like best, and for me, Starbucks Just Isn't It.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    45. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      Blue Mountain is indeed supposed to be the best coffee in the world. But it is even more expensive than Kona (I've seen it online for ~$40-50/lb). I travel to the big island a couple of times a year for work (astronomer), and pick up a few pounds worth for cheap (~$15-20/lb). That may not seem cheap, but buying it on the mainland will cost you at least 50% more.

    46. Re:Four bucks a cup! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Didn't need to drink more than a spoonfull of that to keep awake thou :P

      That reminds me of one of my Dad's stories about coffee in the Army. He knew somebody that would make boiled coffee by putting the grounds, a dash of salt and an egg shell in the pot and boiling it. When the pot was empty, he'd add more of each on top of the old grounds and make more. The last pot before he was forced to empty it was small, and tasted horrid, but it was great when you were trying to wake up for sentry duty late at night.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    47. Re:Four bucks a cup! by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

      Gevalia isn't that great. It's a coffee-of-the-month club, and 1/2 of the coffees were crap. The rest were average.

      Have you ever looked at Starbuck's beans? There's all kinds of rubbish in there. Funny looking beans, beans that are drastically different colors. It's bizarre. I've tried a lot of coffe, and most of the time, I stop into several locally owned shops with their own roasters. I buy beans from them, but occasionally, someone will give me a pound of Starbucks beans, or I'll be at someone's house and they have starbucks' beans, and, after looking at them, I wonder just what they do to get that bag of beans together. I don't know what kind of "blend" they've got going on, but it doesn't seem consistent to me. Maybe they do the "sprayed-on" flavor, and just use the lowest grade beans available?

      --
      -- No sig for you!
    48. Re:Four bucks a cup! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Thats unusual - usually they use small paper cups (about 5oz or so, I'm guessing). Still way too big, but I guess that's to accomodate folks that order doubles and triples.

    49. Re:Four bucks a cup! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      If you buy Gevalia that way, you're never sure what you'll get. However, if you find a blend you like, like Royal Stockholm or Breakfast Blend and tell them to send you only that, you've got the consistancy you expect.

      I suspect that Starbucks is mixing Robusto with the Aribica beans to get the effect you describe. As far as I can tell, they're two different species, and I'm told that unroasted Robusto beans smell more like peanuts than like coffee, but I've never encountered them. You'll note that most quality blends specify that they're all Aribica with no Robusto. BTW, for a good store-blend, try Chock Full 'O Nuts. Quite good!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    50. Re:Four bucks a cup! by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      And somehow Starbucks always manages to hire the cutest girls. I think part of their job description is to be flirty. I've probably ordered complicated drinks just so I have an excuse to stay there longer and hope that they'll pay more attention to me.
      This is a widely-used practice... and is certainly the case at the one near my work.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    51. Re:Four bucks a cup! by ipxodi · · Score: 1

      Eeek! Gevalia????
      Their coffee is horribly overpriced. Green Mountain, Black Bear and even some supermarket brands taste better for similar or less money. They only good use I've found for Gevalia is getting a new coffee maker every couple of years. (3 so far -- why they keep sending me offers, I don't know.)
      And I honestly try the coffee I get with my coffee maker each time, but I'm always disappointed.

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
    52. Re:Four bucks a cup! by cymen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 1 cup of coffee lasts about as long as 1 pack of cigs. Umm... ?

    53. Re:Four bucks a cup! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of taste. I like it, others I know like it, you don't. I first heard of it from somebody who gave me some because they couldn't stand it. I mentiioned it first to show that I have some idea what good coffee is like and second to let others try it and (maybe) enjoy it. I notice you're not defending Starcrud.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    54. Re:Four bucks a cup! by sydsavage · · Score: 1
      If you are in the Twin Cities of Minnneapolis/St. Paul, Dunn Brothers is one of the best coffees I have ever tasted. They started out as a supplier to local restaurants, and then opened a couple of shops around town. One of the owners roasts the coffee himself every morning (or at least that's how it was when I lived there, many moons ago.)

      Well, i just looked up their website, to post a link here, and I see they are going the franchise route. I hope this doesn't ruin it...

      (I'm also dismayed to see the use of IIS.)

    55. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Artifex · · Score: 1
      He knew somebody that would make boiled coffee by putting the grounds, a dash of salt and an egg shell in the pot and boiling it.


      What's the eggshell for?
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    56. Re:Four bucks a cup! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      The thing is, while some of us don't mind variety in flavor, we mind a variety in QUALITY.

      No, Starbucks isn't the best coffee around.... far from it even. Just off the top of my head, I can come up with a number of local coffee shops (which are doing quite well, Starbucks conspiracy theorists' theories aside) that offer a better cup of coffee. OTOH, I can also think of more than that which serve undrinkable swill that's worse than the worst Starbucks on its worst day.

      Having lived in The City for about half a decade, I know where the superior coffee shops are (Though my favorite is actually across The Bay, in Berkeley.). I also know which ones to avoid. This knowledge comes partly from recommendations, partly from trial and error.

      In a strange city/town, I don't know where the superior coffee shops are. And there are nine places that serve swill for every one that IS better than Starbucks. So, if I don't know my way around, and I don't plan on being there often/long enough to GET to know my way around.... guess where I go?

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    57. Re:Four bucks a cup! by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      hey

      is there irony in 'your' sig?
      i mean -- is the irony that 'your' is the wrong one, and hence everyone is an idiot, including the sig writer? i don't get it...

      your, as in your house, your car --- a possession thing.
      'you are', or 'you're'.....
      so is it 'you are all idiots', or do the idiots belong to someone?

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    58. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, around here they hire... interesting... people, but there's always 1 shift with a cute girl. Some restaurant chains (notably Joey Tomatoes and Earls) hires some of the hottest (and by hot I mean non-plastic, ie. beautiful) girls around. It's always a pleasure to visit for lunch.

    59. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where they find them, but the joke is they grow them on secret farms.

    60. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Nachtfalke · · Score: 1

      According to the Coffee FAQ:

      Why do some people put egg shell in coffee grounds?

      Adding eggshell to the grounds of coffee is said to take away some of the bitter taste that can be associated with cheap or over extracted coffee. People also use eggshell to settle the grounds of the coffee. I believe this to be a fairly rare practice now.

    61. Re:Four bucks a cup! by nr · · Score: 1

      Nice, I'm from the small town (~80.000 ppl) Gavle in Sweden (which is Northen Europe for you that dont know) where Gevalia was founded and have its roots, it's only roastery is located here at one side of the river that runs thru the town. It's as you know well known all over the world for its excellent high-quality coffe.

      Gävle / Sweden

    62. Re:Four bucks a cup! by jschrod · · Score: 1
      I would never ever drink coffee that has been in a thermos for more than half an hour.

      In fact, I'm reluctant to drink that bitter stuff at all. This is no Real Coffee(tm). I have an Espresso machine here, of course; as all serious coffee aficionados will have.

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    63. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      As a former smoker, I too only smoked a pack a day, or less. But I felt that I was on the under-side of average, rather than dead on.
      I would occaisionally binge, such as at parties or at stressful events, when I would smoke a lot more than my average.

      I don't think I've got an unrealistic view of smoking, but it's several years out of date, since I have fewer smoker friends now. Perhaps the average number of smokes/day has decreased in the last four years ?

      And perhaps Australian smokers do smoke more than elsewhere. I know Californian smokers have been marginalized by the non-smoking laws here. (I'm an ex-pat Aussie living in CA). This probably decreases their opportunities to go through many packs per day.

      I know when I visited Paris once, many more people smoked and it seemed, more constantly, since you could light up in a bar without fear. It wouldn't surprise me if they had a higher average intake there.

    64. Re:Four bucks a cup! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I was certainly talking about Americans. A pack a day seems to be about average for a smoker who self-identifies as such. I know a few people (in two states, CA and TX) who smoke more than a pack a day, and many who smoke less. That could just be an artifact of the people that I actually know, however. The few Frenchpeople I know who smoke do so like a coal plant, nonstop and heavily. This is particularly amazing when you consider the sheer toxicity of the french cigarette. French cigarettes are to american ones as german beer is to the american stuff - not necessarily better, but nearly always stronger.

      There are places in California where you can still smoke in bars. It's not because it's legal, it's because they're cool towns. Santa Cruz is one of those places; About 50% of the bars will let you smoke, and if the cops do come in they generally give you a chance to put out your cig before they write you a ticket. Then they leave, and you light up another one.

      The only reasonable means of segregating smokers from nonsmokers in bars is to have a separate smoking section under negative pressure (at least, comparatively to the non-smoking room) so when you open the door the smoke doesn't spill out into the other room. There is of course the option to outlaw smoking, but I don't think it's one the state legislature should have made for us. They did it in the name of safety for employees, but I think there is a simpler way to ensure that - stop coddling people. If you don't want to breathe smoke at work, don't work in a smoking establishment. I don't think that's unreasonable at all. There have always been nonsmoking restaurants, though not very many bars. Still, smoking and drinking go together like chocolate and peanut butter.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    65. Re:Four bucks a cup! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Until I can afford an espresso machine that can brew a quad shot without pausing, I don't see the point. A house I lived in had a little krups one-shot but it was a real PITA. Someday I hope to buy a substantial machine from a coffeehouse going under.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    66. Re:Four bucks a cup! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Where I used to work, the went through a number of cute receptionists. They found that the programmers wasted a lot of time by flirting with them during the day, hanging out by the entrance, etc. So they instutitued a new (unofficial) policy - no more good looking, young receptionists. After that, we went thru a slew of 60-somethings, all pleasent, hardworking people, and the productivity of the coders soared! Reverse discrimination?

    67. Re:Four bucks a cup! by maximilln · · Score: 1

      I'm glad the mods gave you funny. I usually get "flamebait" for similar thoughts.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    68. Re:Four bucks a cup! by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1
      That's cause every Australian I know can smoke an entire cigarette in 2 minutes flat. Us normal humans can only do it in 5-10.

      I for one welcome our speed-smoking Australian Overlords!

    69. Re:Four bucks a cup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an moran

  9. Company-owned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't think that Starbucks had any franchises, I thought they were all company-owned (at least in the US and Canada)

    1. Re:Company-owned? by Xandu · · Score: 1

      Almost every location is company owned, but there are some franchises, usually in grocery stores and the like.

      --


      --Xandu
    2. Re:Company-owned? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I didn't think that Starbucks had any franchises, I thought they were all company-owned (at least in the US and Canada)

      Nope. At least as far as I understand, many of the new ones are being opened by private owners. Talking with a few of the employees, it seems that it's really great for the StarBucks owners, because Corp will never shut them down due to low profits. Even if they only make $500 a week they'll leave them open. Apparently, StarBucks corp has decided that leaving small stores open is worth the hassle for the PR it generates.

    3. Re:Company-owned? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Technically they aren't franchise stores, but licensees. I believe that they sign short term (around 5 year) contracts with licensees, who can then be dropped later on.

      Usually if you see a starbucks in an airport, bookstore, arena, convention center, etc it is a licensed shop.

      The main reason for this is that big venues tend to have exclusive contracts for all vending. In sports arenas, for example, everything from condom vending machines in the bathroom to the clubhouse restaurant is all owned by the same people.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    4. Re:Company-owned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tommy Lee had a Starbucks installed in his house. Wonder if he's going there too?

  10. now if he was CLEVER... by acroyear · · Score: 4, Funny

    he would have written a computer program to keep track of all the starbucks, and visit them in the chronological order that they were opened, and have that program keep track of all the messy details of any that closed or moved, etc.

    (yes, a douglas adams reference to the infinitely prolongued guy who insulted the universe in alphabetical order)

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
    1. Re:now if he was CLEVER... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, a better idea would be to get a list of all the current Starbuckses (sp Starbuxs?) and visit them. After the trip, get a list of all new Starbucci (sp?) and do the same. Repeat, rinse, and wash.

    2. Re:now if he was CLEVER... by Wally+Fenderson · · Score: 0

      any that closed or moved

      I Didn't think starbucks stores closed.....

      --
      It must be Thursday. I could never get the hang of Thursdays.
    3. Re:now if he was CLEVER... by Finuvir · · Score: 4, Informative

      That was Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged, made immortal by an accident involving an irrational particle accelerator, a liquid lunch and two elastic stripes. Arthur Dent? Arthur Phillip Dent? You're a jerk... A complete asshole.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    4. Re:now if he was CLEVER... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was clever, he wouldn't have changed his name to "Winter"...

    5. Re:now if he was CLEVER... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plural of Starbucks would be Starbuckses according to proper grammar rules but I believe that typically its plural is just Starbucks as in - "There are many Starbucks in Manhattan."

    6. Re:now if he was CLEVER... by Wow8agger · · Score: 1

      Damn you UID 69688 - he always beats me to the proper spelling:
      Wowbaggers profile page

    7. Re:now if he was CLEVER... by thinksnow · · Score: 1

      I thought the line finished with "kneebiter"?

    8. Re:now if he was CLEVER... by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      He did in the American version. There's no real canonical version in H2G2 though since the whole thing is different in radio, books, tv and now presumably movie versions.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
  11. To be different? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Visiting every starbucks to be different is like visiting every taxidermist's shop because it's the cool thing to do and all the kids are doing it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:To be different? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Right, because posting comments on Slashdot about what the cool kids are doing is the popular thing to do.

  12. Why? by genixia · · Score: 1

    Does this guy have some strange desire to get ulcers?

    1. Re:Why? by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      What, are Starbucks drinks high in H. pylori or something?

  13. Starbucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, another Starbucks story on the front page? Man, these guys are getting more exposure than SCO on Slashdot lately.

  14. He's on TV! by strictnein · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wouldn't want to mention this:

    I'm scheduled for a short interview on CNN Headline News Thusday, July 8, at approximately 7:45 PM EDT.

    Gotta love that Headline News. Ever since the merger they avoid any type of real news like the plague. And the average age of the news presenters is, what, 13?

    1. Re:He's on TV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ever since the merger they avoid any type of real news like the plague.

      As opposed to the other network which never presents any news, merely commentary and insight on how the White House is so great, right?

      And the average age of the news presenters is, what, 13?

      So you prefer looking at 90 year-old bags and curmudgeons?

      Whatever your opinion CNN has the best looking female news personnel of any network. To name just a few:

      Veronica de la Cruz
      Betty Nguyen
      Robin Meade
      Susan Hendricks
      Rudi Bakhtiar
      Heidi Collins

    2. Re:He's on TV! by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1

      Only one reason to watch CNN-HN: Robin Meade.

    3. Re:He's on TV! by strictnein · · Score: 1

      Man... anytime you knock headline news on slashdot people take it so personally.

      As opposed to the other network which never presents any news...

      You, like most people, confuse they're fairly unbiased news reporting (with a slight right slant), to their many very-biased commentator shows. It's unfortunate. Fox News Channel is not equivalent to CNN Headline News.

      Listen, I woke up every morning for about 15 years watching CNN headline news. Every damn morning I watched at least 30 minutes. Then the merger and now it's absolute shit. The last straw was when some no count, piece of shit band "just happened" to stop by and PLAY SOME LIVE MUSIC. Would it be tough to get guess who owned the record label that the band was signed to? That's not news. I love

      And the average age of the news presenters is, what, 13?

      So you prefer looking at 90 year-old bags and curmudgeons?


      Yes, because when they actually went off script and offered some brief perspective on the news, they would actually have experienced life.

    4. Re:He's on TV! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      Gotta love that Headline News.

      Especially when they go to the cheerleading blonde on the floor of the stock exchange, reporting chipper and cheerfully as if a sporting event had just transpired.

      Of course, Headline News can't compete on the same playing field of pretty vacuous blondes that appear with crossed legs on the set of Fox.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    5. Re:He's on TV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm the original AC poster (can't you tell) and while yes, it was unfair of me to compare CNN Headline News with Fox, I still stand by my assertion that Fox does not give news stories, it comments on news stories. The only time Fox actually gives news is at the top and bottom of the hour for about 2 minutes (usually much less) or the "Around the world in 60 seconds" segment (forget the guys name).

      I make it a point to watch Fox so that when I make a comment I am speaking from personal experience, not some regurgitated story I read somewhere.

      Tune in any time to Fox when it does not have one of their commentary shows on and tell me how often they are reporting news stories. Essentially none. Now compare that to CNN (regular) and Headline News. Headline News, while its quality may have declined, still gives news stories. CNN is the same. From time to time they may have an 'expert' on a subject give their opinion on a story but when that segment is over the news continues.

      As far as newscasters going off script and giving their perspective, who cares! That's not their job. Their job is to read the paper/teleprompter in front of them.

      That reminds me of the scene in Broadcast News where William Hurts character was covering a breaking news story about the pilot of an F-14 who was shot down near Libya. At the end of story he makes the comment, "I think we'll be all right."

      The head of the station had been in the control room watching this and when he heard this remarked, "Who the hell cares what you think!"

    6. Re:He's on TV! by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >And the average age of the news presenters is, what, 13?

      Age, possibly; IQ, certainly. You lose brain cells just watching them. Mind you, the occasional plunging neckline has eye candy value.
      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    7. Re:He's on TV! by Opie812 · · Score: 0

      Ever since the merger they avoid any type of real news like the plague

      Oh please, the plague hasn't been real news for hundreds of years.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    8. Re:He's on TV! by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gotta love that Headline News. Ever since the merger they avoid any type of real news like the plague.

      Oh shit - the plague is back?!?

  15. Watch the web counter spin by Jabes · · Score: 1

    Well, the site is holding up quite well for now. The web counter says 60664 hits, and it's 16.55 (GMT+1). The time on this posting should tell you in your time zone.

    How high can it go?

    1. Re:Watch the web counter spin by iwhittle · · Score: 1

      Get on Slashdot... Talk about a good way to get your resume out there. No wonder this guy has no problem finding a contract gig.

    2. Re:Watch the web counter spin by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

      The web counter says 60664 hits ... blah....
      How high can it go?


      Am I the only person who quite honestly does not care? and how the hell is this guy getting on CNN HN, when I'm willing to bet that this probably never even made it on the fscking ticker tape.

      An interesting tidbit of UFI; yes.... News for nerds. Stuff that matters; .. ... . not so much

      just my $0.02

  16. How many public toilets has he visited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what we really want to know.

  17. Traveling Salesman Problem? by bje2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was under the impression that the traveling salesman problem had to do with finding the most efficient (i.e. shortest) route to traverse a *finite* amount of points...how is this the same?

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Ag3nt · · Score: 1

      No the travelling salesmans' problem is that people want to blow your head off. Wait, no. Thats door to door salesmen.

    2. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by stevemm81 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think they just put that to appeal to our Slashdot nerdiness :).

      He's just visiting a lot of points in an ever-expanding graph without much regard for the optimal route, so yeah, it's not the TSP.

    3. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      You're just lucky they spelled 'traveling salesman problem' right this time. Expecting them to know what it means is just too much to ask. This is Slashdot - we know about sci-fi TV shows and movies, CowboyNeal and his promiscuous mother, and leetspeak. Nothing else!

    4. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't spell it right - they wrote "traveling" when of course it should be "travelling". It may not look much to you, but it's one L of a difference to me.

    5. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by N3Z · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought it had something to do with the farmers daughter.

      --
      .signature not found
    6. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by kris_lang · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm... If I wanted to be like Len Adelman, I could encode each Starbuck's location into a short oligonucleotide sequence, create matched-pair of DNA oligos each representing a travel-step from starbu_x to starbu_y, create a DNA soup (watch your filthy mind!) of these oligo-pairs, do the appropriate restrictions and selections by weight and publish an article in Science or Nature, have the journalists and flacks mis-represent it as being a DNA computer capable of solving the "Travelling Salesman" problem when every mathematician and theorist knows it to be the Directed Hamiltonian Graph problem, not worry about it, and move on.

      Oh, and please insert "profit" and the appropriate "/item" tags around the list above, and let LaTeX number it for me. Thanx.

    7. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One "bloo'y L" of a difference, from the sounds of it. Slashdot is, to my knowledge, hosted in the US. The Japanese users post in American English - why can't you?

    8. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Offtopic slightly but I had a question about the traveling salesman problem. Back in a computer science course we made a genetic algorithm to solve it. Then optionally for extra credit we could solve another problem very similiar to the traveling salesman. The name was almost the same with maybe a one word difference. Instead of there being a cost for each transit and having to traverse them all, there was a cost for each node (I think) and a start and a finish. Does anyone know the name of this problem or more details about it? I checked the top TSP google results but none mentioned it.

      Thanks

    9. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      \begin{enumerate}
      \item encode each Starbuck's location into a short oligonucleotide sequence
      \item create matched-pair of DNA oligos each representing a travel-step from starbu_x to starbu_y
      \item create a DNA soup (watch your filthy mind!) of these oligo-pairs
      \item do the appropriate restrictions and selections by weight
      \item publish an article in Science or Nature
      \item ... \footnote{get grant from NIH}
      \item Profit!
      \item have the journalists and flacks mis-represent it as being a DNA computer capable of solving the "Travelling Salesman" problem when every mathematician and theorist knows it to be the Directed Hamiltonian Graph problem, not worry about it, and move on
      \end{enumerate}

    10. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real Travelling Salesman problem is about making a living.
      In theory, this dude might ramp up his efficiency if he applied a best mean path finder type deal.

    11. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by winterene · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey, Winter here. The traveling salesman problem (as I remember if from my comp. sci courses) comes into play when I reach a city where I've numerous Starbucks to visit as quickly as possible before leaving. For example, today, Around Atlanta--Hiram, Austell, Suwanee, Kennsaw, and Conyers. Or anywhere in California.

    12. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like the Chinese postman or Königsberg bridge problem:

      http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/chinesePostman.htm l
      http://people.bath.ac.uk/ma3mb/route.htm

    13. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason, traveling salesman with one l is the standard spelling.

    14. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by dAzED1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      how nice of someone to create an account post in this crap, and claim (don't care if rightly) that they are the infamously stupid "winter." If its you, thanks for contributing to the gas shortage, to the brown air, and to the stereotype of programmers being geeks with no common sense or social skills.

    15. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by scrod98 · · Score: 1
      Dude, cut back on the caffeine.

      --
      LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
    16. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 1

      Probably because between travels from one Starbucks to another he is forced to map out the shortest path to the each public bathroom.

    17. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Not "nothing". Depends on his strategy.

      Of course, there's no way to solve the TSP in a sane amount of time even for a relatively small graph. The problem is NP-complete. In this case, with points being added regularly and a messy definition of "distance"*, it's pretty much guaranteed that the answer is going to change faster than it can be computed.

      On the other hand, if you don't actually care about getting *the* optimal answer, there are a lot of good algorithms that will get you a reasonably efficient path without a lot of computational expense.

      * For example, do you measure the distance between two Starbuck's outlets by linear distance? By distance taking major roads? By travel time? By some combination of travel time and cost? For example, you could cut travel time greatly by renting a helicopter, but it wouldn't be worth it.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    18. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Yewbert · · Score: 1
      map out the shortest path to the each public bathroom.

      Ah, a relief map!

      Or an IP search?

      Shuttin' up.

    19. Re:Traveling Salesman Problem? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      He may be contributing to the gas shortage and pollution, but the prime source of global warming has been traced to you flapping your yap. Do the planet a favor and stop emitting greenhouse gases, even if only for a single day.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  18. This must be by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    an absolute, nailed on "please let me bear your children" hit with the ladies.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:This must be by foidulus · · Score: 1

      an absolute, nailed on "please let me bear your children" hit with the ladies.
      I don't know where you learned biology, but in human beings usually it is the female who does the actual c hild bearing...

    2. Re:This must be by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Shh! I was having fun watching him try! ;)

    3. Re:This must be by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you got your sense of humor, but I'm fairly sure the part in quote marks is supposed to represent what the ladies say when they find out about this guy. Or were you trying to make some kind of "I don't get the joke" joke?

    4. Re:This must be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably does better than your tales of glory and sorrow in counter-strike.

  19. Cost by bobthemuse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's see... 4000 stores, multiplied by an average of $8 per cup of coffee, comes to what?

    1. Re:Cost by sfire · · Score: 2, Informative

      Use Google darn it

    2. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More money than you make in 1 year.

    3. Re:Cost by WhiteBandit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's see... 4000 stores, multiplied by an average of $8 per cup of coffee, comes to what?

      Hmm, the units don't work out, but I thought I'd offer you my help anyway.

      It comes to 32000 dollar stores per cup of coffe. ;)

      The thing is, *everyone* seems to complain about them, but the damn shops are always crowded! I think there is some double standard shinanigans going on... :-P

    4. Re:Cost by sartin · · Score: 1

      From reading the article, it sounds like he doesn't often pay. In the course of the day they profile, they mention two half-cups of coffee, both complimentary. Travel cost is still a problem. He reduces that by sleeping in his car at Wal-Mart.

  20. End of the Universe by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's really important, though, is how many Starbucks he has seen across the street from another Starbucks.

    1. Re:End of the Universe by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully he isn't going senile or he'd have trouble keeping track of such occurances.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    2. Re:End of the Universe by spoonyfork · · Score: 2

      What's really important, though, is how many Starbucks he has seen across the street from another Starbucks.

      This happened to me in Columbus, Ohio a few years back. It sufficiently freaked me out that I was numb for the rest of the day.

      I think it is akin to the dream of seeing yourself of the street and your brain becomes overloaded, "how can I be here if I'm there". A primal urge crept into my skull suggesting that I had to destroy the other in order to assert my existence. It was all very Solaris (the movie, not the OS).

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    3. Re:End of the Universe by marnargulus · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a few of those. The most well known is the (Twin?) River Oaks in Houston. I couldn't find the video of it again, but it is the one Lewis Black is famous for complaining about. Here is a link to some of the double starbucks phenom.
      (http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/i/d/idg101/st arbucks/)

    4. Re:End of the Universe by ttldkns · · Score: 1

      if you look at his UK pictures, they're all in london and if you put them on a map most of them are within 2 or 3 square miles of each other. I havent been to london much but i spotted a few he missed too like the one practically on the LSE campus and another round the back streets of the southbank near the tate modern.
      i hope his job pays well!!

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    5. Re:End of the Universe by ari_j · · Score: 1

      There's a pair in Goodyear, AZ - but it's really a Target across the street from a Barnes & Noble, so it's not so special - kind of like having a public restroom across the street from another public restroom, more or less.

    6. Re:End of the Universe by thedillybar · · Score: 1

      And for all the nay-sayers, I have proof!

    7. Re:End of the Universe by magarity · · Score: 3, Informative

      how many Starbucks he has seen across the street from another Starbucks

      While this is quite funny on the surface there is sound business reasoning behind it. Most traffic intersections are laid out in such a way that a shop on one corner is a major pain to get to from driving along the opposite side of the street. And then getting back the way you were headed requires a major detour. So in a high density area with a lot of traffic it is perfectly worthwhile to open two shops, each on opposite corners to catch customers headed in both directions. Keep in mind when opening your own shop, whether a franchise of a major chain or a private brand.

    8. Re:End of the Universe by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Sure, you'll see plenty of intersections with a gas station on each corner. Why not a starbucks?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:End of the Universe by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      While you have a very valid point about traffic flow and convenience, I have to ask why, if this is such a good business model, don't we hear about all the big chains doing it? Is there a McDonalds across from a McDonalds somewhere? Is it just that the Starbucks in this configuration get more attention because of their percieved ubiquity?

    10. Re:End of the Universe by parc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was an interview on NPR uite some time ago with someone from starbucks, and the interviewer asked him about starbucks so close to each other. He had a story about it that goes something like this:

      It was actually accidental. When the new store opened (across the street from the old store), the old store's sales increased 20%, and the new store nearly matched it. So we did some reasearch and found that if we can put locations within 2-3 miles of eachother, the revenue of both stores will be higher.

      The story was on maybe a year or more ago, so obviously I'm strongly paraphrasing.

      At any rate, remember: being able to spit on one starbucks from another starbucks isn't really their idea. They just went with observed phenomina.

    11. Re:End of the Universe by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      yes, and him and his wife were so fortunate to have been raised among catalogs.

    12. Re:End of the Universe by Big+Yak · · Score: 1

      Anyone catch the Shrek 2 scene where the city is being assaulted and the wave of citizens runs screaming from one StarBucks across the street to another?

      --
      -Hell hath no fury like that of a woman scorned for /.
    13. Re:End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were they both working on Macs at the time?

    14. Re:End of the Universe by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      here in minneapolis, there was a spot in uptown where there were two starbucks separated by a parking lot. a small parking lot.

      vast prosperity...

    15. Re:End of the Universe by parkrrrr · · Score: 2, Funny
      kind of like having a public restroom across the street from another public restroom
      Except one has worse-tasting beverages.

      Which one that is is left as an exercise for the reader.

    16. Re:End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought all public restrooms had horrible beverages.

    17. Re:End of the Universe by magarity · · Score: 1

      Is there a McDonalds across from a McDonalds somewhere?

      Because there's already a Burger King on the other corner...
      I actually did once see a McDonald's with a conveyor that brought food to a drive-through kiosk on the other side of the street. The kiosk's occupant took your order and cash and then people in the main building cooked the food. The conveyor was glassed over so you could watch your bag of food trundling across.

    18. Re:End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a couple stores like that on the main drag in Vancouver, BC. We drove up from Seattle thinking that a trip to BC would be "leaving the country." Then we saw the diagonally-opposed Starbucks stores...

    19. Re:End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You eat pieces of shit for breakfast? H.G.

    20. Re:End of the Universe by planetBX · · Score: 1

      I have seen the end of the universe (nearly) in NYC, near Grand Central Terminal. I could see two starbucks in one field of view. *shock*

    21. Re:End of the Universe by Herg · · Score: 1

      A shopping center about a mile from my house has two in one building!

      One is inside a grocery store. The other is in the corner of the building, about three doors down from the grocery store.

    22. Re:End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. That was Farbucks not Starbucks.

    23. Re:End of the Universe by GuyinVA · · Score: 1

      I've actually seen 3 Shell gas stations on the same block. None of them where hard to get to from the main street. it seems that when Shell bought out Texaco, there were several Texacos next to Shells...

    24. Re:End of the Universe by init-five · · Score: 1
      The End of the World Lemma: "If you see a Starbuks Store from another Starbucks Store, you are at the end of the Universe"

      There is a little known but helpful corollary:
      A line connecting any two pyramids will also cross at least one WalMart

      --
      Hallowed are the Ori
    25. Re:End of the Universe by Yewbert · · Score: 1
      Is there a McDonalds across from a McDonalds somewhere?

      Because there's already a Burger King on the other corner...

      I don't think it's at all apocryphal that this is exactly how some chain fast food restaurants pick their locations:

      McDonald's: Study traffic patterns, population demographics, civic boundaries and zoning, rental prices, conduct surveys and marketing studies, etc., and optimize all those factors before choosing a location for a new store.

      Wendy's: Find a McDonald's, then plop down a new store in the nearest available lot.

    26. Re:End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen the end... Outside the Yokohama train station in Japan you can see three at once.

    27. Re:End of the Universe by clintp · · Score: 1

      Maybe not McDonalds, how about gas stations instead? All over here in Detroit there are same-brand stations across the street from each other.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
    28. Re:End of the Universe by NaDrew · · Score: 1

      At the Sequoia Station shopping center in Redwood City, CA, there is a Starbucks twenty feet away from a Safeway (grocery store) which has a Starbucks just inside the front door. The total distance between the two must be less than thirty or forty feet.
      I went to the in-store location a few times because my club card would get me a free drink after I bought eight, but the employees were generally rude and the product was substandard. So I'm back to the outside location, where the baristas are cute and the grande sugar-free vanilla (or hazelnut) latte is good.
      And yes, it brings Lewis Black to mind every time.

      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    29. Re:End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's all relative.

      Compared to Starbucks, perhaps they're not so horrible.

    30. Re:End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't people just get out of their car and cross the street. Surely they don't drink coffee in their car? That would be unsafe and ruin the semi-religious coffee experience.

      I've never been to (or even seen) a Starbucks, so I don't know if they have drive-through, but I would be appalled if they do.

    31. Re:End of the Universe by polyiguana · · Score: 1

      While you have a very valid point about traffic flow and convenience, I have to ask why, if this is such a good business model, don't we hear about all the big chains doing it?

      There actually is a legitimate reason for this. Most Starbucks in the country are company owned. So they can take the short term hit of having two locations next to each other for the long term improvement in business. On the other hand, most fast food joints are franchise operations, and each one has its own exclusive territory which they want to preserve. So the franchisee doesn't want to open another store of the same kind across the street because the franchisor isn't giving them money to do it (and it would be a large short term financial hit), while if any other franchisee moves in close proximity, the existing franchisee will scream bloody murder.

  21. Traveling Salesman Problem? by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Am I correct that this has nothing to do with the traditional traveling salesman problem?

    You know, finding the shortest route to hit all nodes by traveling along weighted edges in a finite graph?

  22. Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What motivates him?

    Caffeine, obviously.

    1. Re:Well duh by TheMeddler · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but wait till he crashes...

      --
      90% Professional Slacker
  23. you know... by dAzED1 · · Score: 0, Troll
    what an absolutely great way to aide to the destruction of the environment. Do we REALLY need to go over, again, the damage caused by jet airliners?

    One could "be different" is ways far less absolutely stupid. Take the money being spent on airfare, and open a homeless kitchen - that would be different, right?

    Hopefully, eventually, we'll (as a group) stop thinking crap like this is cool. Its a blatant waste of natural and economic resources, and there are far better things to entertain ones self with than freaking coffee. Make a name by contributing to some breakthrough OSS project...volunteer with Habitat for Humanity...something. I have to breathe this damn dirty air too, you know - your rediculous quest does affect me.

    1. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously he's fucking driving everywere

      idiot

    2. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what an absolutely great way to aide to the destruction of the environment. Do we REALLY need to go over, again, the damage caused by jet airliners?

      <sarcasm>You are so right about this-- we all know those planes he's using to transport him around the country on his fool's errand would not be flying if he wasn't aboard.</sarcasm>

      Your point about doing something more worthwhile with the money he's shitting away on this adventure would have been much better received, except you came off like a bloody fucking twit thanks to the first two sentences of your post.

    3. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > what an absolutely great way to aide to the destruction of the environment. Do
      > we REALLY need to go over, again, the damage caused by jet airliners?

      I didn't read anything in the piece which suggested he'd hired his own jet plane to travel between locations with. He's probably just buying a ticket like you or I might.

      > Take the money being spent on airfare, and open a homeless kitchen - that would
      > be different, right?

      This sounds like the sort of thing wasters suggest other people do, but with no intention of doing themselves.

      > Hopefully, eventually, we'll (as a group) stop thinking crap like this is cool.

      It's not cool, but neither is the way you're going about trying to change things. He's doing something - you're posting to Slashdot whining about it.

      > there are far better things to entertain ones self with than freaking coffee

      In your opinion. He probably prefers drinking coffee at starbucks to sitting around typing messages to people he'll never actually meet.

    4. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop wasting precious electricity by responding to superfluous articles on slashdot!!

    5. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life Libery and the persuid of happiness.

      He has a RIGHT to do this thanks to his liberty and if this makes him happy then its a good thing for him to do. You sound like on of those socialist hippy assholes, crying about the enviornment and expecting him to spread his wealth. Honestly listen to yourself you sound like you belong in Soviate Russia before the collaps.

      Also your a big hipocrit, I looked at you little little web journal and you seem to be spending time in night clubs and the like, why don't you spend YOUR disposeable time and money solely for others?

    6. Re:you know... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      I didn't suggest he had his own plane, dolt. When you book a flight though, you create demand that increases the supply. Even if he's just driving thousands upon thousands of miles, that's still an oil waste and major pollution source. There's no way he could keep up exclusively through driving, though...esp if he actually does work occassionally.

      If, as an AC, you'd care to mention what in my post suggests to you that I don't do anything myself, that would be fabulous. Additionally, when I see something STUPID that harms me, YES, I will say its stupid. What would you think is better - hunting the guy down, and hitting him on the head with a rubber ducky? No, I think the resources under my control are better spent on other things, since not only would hunting him down be a waste of time and money, it wouldn't be in the least bit entertaining.

      Did you note in the article that he admits that after a couple cups it tastes terrible, and that he daily gets to the point where he has to follow every sip of coffee with a gulp of water to get the foul taste out? Doesn't sound like entertainment to me, unless perhaps he's just masochistic.

    7. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always drive from America to Japan.

    8. Re:you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do we REALLY need to go over, again, the damage caused by jet airliners?

      Do we REALLY need to go over, again, what a dumb-ass you are?

      RTFA.

      He drives (and sleeps in) a $4,000 Honda.

    9. Re:you know... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      do you understand supply/demand? Fewer planes will fly if fewer people are in them.

    10. Re:you know... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      how did he drive to europe, and asia? There must be some really freaking long bridges and/or tunnels I don't know about

      who's the idiot? Why don't you read the article.

    11. Re:you know... by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      You are just so totally right about that - we all know they'd fly those aircraft whether people wanted to travel on them or not. Supply and demand? Duh? Twit.

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

  24. What motivates him? by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    Probably his "dynamic" personality.

    /lame_joke

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:What motivates him? by chgros · · Score: 1

      Jose Bove ? Tu postes sur /. ?

  25. Re:let me be the first to say.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "What's the point?!?!?!"

    Said the guy registerring his disgust throughout the internet.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  26. Sounds familiar by Mirk · · Score: 1

    This guy may think he's purpose in life is unattainable, but he's got nothing on Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged.

    --

    --
    What short sigs we have -
    One hundred and twenty chars!
    Too short for haiku.
  27. Expensive by Zorilla · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Assuming he bought a frappucino one during each visit, let's see:
    4,000 visits x $23.50 for one Starbucks brand frappucino = $58,000 spent

    Some people have expensive hobbies...

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops, changed the price for humorous effect without changing the total. Should equal $94,000

    2. Re:Expensive by rsturbonutter · · Score: 1

      In the article it says that at each Starbucks for it to count they have to give him a free half cup of coffee ... so just gas and time expense

    3. Re:Expensive by thedillybar · · Score: 1
      >Assuming he bought a frappucino one during each visit, let's see:

      That's a bad assumption. He appears to be hitting towns with the most Starbucks in them. I doubt he's buying 5 frappucinos in an hour or two.

      The cost of the hobby obviously lies in the outrageous traveling expenses.

    4. Re:Expensive by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1


      Actually, according to the article, he shows the manager some newspaper clippings of his exploits, then asks for a free 1/2 cup of coffee.

      On a side note, the Plano, TX Starbucks location (the one across from Collin Creek Mall) which he says he got his start is also the very first Starbucks I ever visited. Fortuntately, it didn't affect me nearly as much, as I've probably only been to Starbucks less than a dozen times in the 4 years since.

  28. I'm personally more interested in ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:I'm personally more interested in ... by jea6 · · Score: 1

      A three iron? I remember when I did this with my 7 iron. What a wimp.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    2. Re:I'm personally more interested in ... by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Man, is he ever gonna be embarassed when he gets to the green, and realizes he left his putter in Choybalsan.

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    3. Re:I'm personally more interested in ... by thedillybar · · Score: 1
      >A three iron? I remember when I did this with my 7 iron. What a wimp.

      I'd like to see him carry his entire bag this far. Without a cart.

    4. Re:I'm personally more interested in ... by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      The Klondike Open might be a little more managable for the average golfer. I tried finding a website with info on it, but failed. Basically, it's a single hole, par 72 golf tourney in Alaska. You tee off in the middle of town and they set a 5 gallon bucket into the snow on top of the local mountain. You can use an orange ball, tee up the ball on every swing, and take along a spotter and caddy. You can clear branches and vegetation that's in your way. Otherwise all normal golf rules apply.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  29. This is a poor man's Hooters-opoly by grunt107 · · Score: 1

    Although not as unique, going to ALL Hooters locations (and getting pics w/the Hooties) is far more fun - IMO.

  30. slashdot in action by joshds · · Score: 1

    His website seems to be holding up rather well, but his pictures are no longer displaying.. seems like he hosts them at http://home.flash.net/~ral1/starbucks/bigimages/ with file names looking like DSCNxxxx.jpg -- which begs the question, he knows which location is what when he gets around to updating the webpage (unless that's 20 seconds after he gets in the car). And on cost, if he must by caffinated coffee in each, let's just say that's $2.50 per cup * 4200 stores / 7 years: $1500 year. Isn't too outrageous.

  31. Visiting each restaurant once by Animats · · Score: 1
    There was somebody who set out to eat once in each restaurant in New York City. That, at least, could be fun. Different food every day.

    Visiting every Starbucks is like visiting every Burger King.

    1. Re:Visiting each restaurant once by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Yeah - neither Starbucks and Burger King is worth actually eating at. Yuck.

      More fun would be visiting, say, every county courthouse in the country. There are a finite and stable number of them, and how you make your visit can vary greatly from one to the next!

    2. Re:Visiting each restaurant once by Animats · · Score: 1
      More fun would be visiting, say, every county courthouse in the country.

      There's a project to do this, leaving behind a memorial to Ronald Reagan at each stop.

    3. Re:Visiting each restaurant once by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should do the same thing with every school in the country, and leave a statue of a child in a dunce cap at each one. They could title the statue "The Reagan Legacy".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Visiting each restaurant once by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      leaving behind a memorial to Ronald Reagan at each stop.

      Let me guess, it's a bottle of Ketchup. Since it was Reagan's administration that declared Ketchup to be a vegetable.

    5. Re:Visiting each restaurant once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a project to do this, leaving behind a memorial to Ronald Reagan at each stop.

      Be serious. Who shits that much?

  32. The question by rokka · · Score: 1

    The question is: Does this guy REALLY need more coffee??

    --
    I could be wrong. I'm always wrong...
  33. Wow, this sounds awfully familiar... by shawnmchorse · · Score: 1

    PROJECT: DENNY'S

    THE MISSION: To visit every Denny's restaurant in the world (or at least as many as possible), getting lots of free stuff along the way.

    THE VEHICLE: Das Büs, the Infamous Love Den of Steel. Tho', as it is currently "on sabbatical", Der Satürn will take its place.

  34. Haha. Starbucks. by pclminion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What shitty coffee.

    Here in Portland, we firebomb new Starbucks facilities. Fuck you and your corporate coffee. Quit Walmarting the good old coffee shops out of existence.

    They've just opened another one across the street from the tiny espresso shack I love to frequent in the mornings. If she ends up going under because of it, I think I might get in the mood for a little firebombing myself...

    1. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Same thing here in the SF Bay Area.

      However. In most of the US, Starbucks created a desire and a market for decent little coffee shops. It's increased the demand for coffee shops so much that it also increased the demand for non-Starbucks coffee shops.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here in Portland, we firebomb new Starbucks facilities. Fuck you and your corporate coffee. Quit Walmarting the good old coffee shops out of existence. They've just opened another one across the street from the tiny espresso shack I love to frequent in the mornings. If she ends up going under because of it, I think I might get in the mood for a little firebombing myself...

      If that coffee shop goes under, it's not the fault of Starbucks, but the cheap customers. We have plenty of indy coffee shops in NYC that survive because there's enough people willing to put their money where their mouths are. If the shop goes under, then go rant to the PATRONS who decided the fate of the small shop; SB and WM only gives them the choice, they don't make it.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    3. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Corporations make the gasoline you use in your molotov cocktails you corporate whore cocksucking sellouts!

    4. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I don't really mind Starbucks coffee. Yes it is a little burnt, but their cold drinks are really nice on a hot day (although they make you sweat profusely). That being said I probably would rather go to a smaller joint just for regular coffee, but I've only seen one before. In Shrewsbury, MA there's one called Lala Java (or something like that). Doing a quick search I see there's one in California. It didn't look like it but is there some sort of a chain going on?

      How do people generally feel about Dunkin' Donut's coffee? It seems to me that they are trying to compete on par with Starbucks. At least in Mass, they're kicking Starbucks' asses.

    5. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by strictnein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right! Firebombing companies we disagree with is the wave of the future! Screw laws!

      F'en idiots couldn't even firebomb the place right. THEY DIDN"T EVEN START THE PLACE ON FIRE. YOU BREAK THE WINDOWS FIRST, THEN THROUGH THE FIREBOMB IN.

      I'm definitely not a Starbucks fan (I prefer Caribou (the #2 chain)), but maybe some people like to get coffee at a place where they're not treated like they're interupting the employees by wanting to order. Or, they can get service even though they happen to be in a good mood and aren't wearing a completely black outfit to show that they're deep, dark people. IT'S FUCKING COFFEE PEOPLE! COFFEE! THEY SELL COFFEE!!

      Fuckin nitwit.

      Best quote from your article:

      "if neighbors don't want the Starbucks, they should stay away from the store"

    6. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      They're evil, but I think the best thing they did was to give people a reason to hang out downtown and just talk to one another.

      They've revitalized some areas... and being price snobs, only the top quality whores can afford to drink coffee there.

    7. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by thefirelane · · Score: 1

      Yes, The world applauds freedom fighters like yourself. Without people like you to make up our minds about what we should and should not do, I don't know what we'd do. The ignorant masses are grateful for those anointed ones like yourself who are wise enough to make these decisions for us. God forbid we be allowed to choose where we want to shop, we can not handle such power.

    8. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by pubjames · · Score: 1

      If that coffee shop goes under, it's not the fault of Starbucks, but the cheap customers.

      This is a common argument, often heard with regards to Walmart - "hey, if the mom and pop can't compete with Walmart, it's there fault!" Or alternatively, "it's the customers choice, and customers prefer Walmart!" That kind of stuff.

      It's not true of course. A highstreet coffee shop that has been going for years might not be able to survive if it loses all its tourist trade, even if it has lots of locals that love it. So the locals suffer, and the character of the locality suffers.

    9. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      To all the responders...

      My comments were grossly sarcastic. I don't advocate firebombing of anything.

      I'm just flaming on Slashdot, as we all do. Chill.

    10. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by swb · · Score: 1

      In most of the US, Starbucks created a desire and a market for decent little coffee shops. It's increased the demand for coffee shops so much that it also increased the demand for non-Starbucks coffee shops.

      It'd be interesting to read a history of coffee, particularly the "good coffee/espresso" trend that I noticed here in Minneapolis in the late 80s.

      Outside of a few ethnic neighborhoods and New York, could you even *get* an espresso prior to 1985 or so? Hell, in Minneapolis you could only get that weak, commercial "all day" coffee that midwestern women made and drank. Espresso, latte and "gourmet" coffee were unheard of then. Some organic coops may have sold whole beans because they were unprocessed, but not necessarily because they made gourmet coffee.

    11. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's great for you and the people in NYC, but some areas aren't so lucky. Where I live the best coffee you can get is the sewage they have at gas station chains. I actually look forward to visiting Canada every now and then so I can enjoy "decent" coffee at Tim Hortons (I'm sure many Canidians reading this are laughing their ass off right now). Recently a Starbucks did open near by, which would be good except for the fact that it's always packed to capacity and cars orbit the place like the rings of Saturn. I'd love to have a good small local coffee shop around here, but it looks like our only salvation will be Starbucks =P

    12. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Of course, once the non-Starbucks coffee shops get spun up, Starbucks sees that there's a demand for a coffee shop, and opens one next door, or across the street.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I advocate the firebombing of starbucks. Just please wait until there's no one inside. And, don't blame it on me when they catch you and try you for arson. You know it's illegal.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1
      What's not true? You don't actually refute the quoted statement. You seem to be refuting something to do with locals and tourists, but nobody (including you) made a statement to that effect.

      See, you have to set up your paper tigers before you knock them down so triumphantly.

    15. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I think it was the beatniks & hippies (queers), but we've had cafes and good coffee here in the SF Bay Area for a long, long time. I wouldn't know about any time before my parents moved here, but they had favorite cafes here in the 60s. That includes neighboring suburban counties.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    16. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      I work in downtown Portland and have tried, in addition to Starbucks, six other little shops within walking distance of my work. For hot espresso drinks (double tall mocha, [Homer] hmmmmm, mocha, *drool* *drool* *drool* [/Homer]) all but two are better than Starbucks. For blended drinks though, (think Frappucino types) Starbucks is better by far. So I will continue to get them from Starbucks because I just can't rationalize giving money to someone, for something that I don't particularly like, solely because they are small. That being said I will also continue to try the little guys from time to time and if they get into the same ballpark as Starbucks, then they will certainly have my business.

      In case you are interested, the best blended drink I have ever found, Portland or elswhere, is at Primo Espresso in Tigard. (At the corner of Hall and Durham, if you happen to be familiar with the area;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    17. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by jhagler · · Score: 1

      "In most of the US, Starbucks created a desire and a market for decent little coffee shops"

      I think that this has to be one of the most intelligent statements I've heard in all the Starbucks arguements lately. Prior to Starbucks entering our area, there were a very few locally owned coffee shops, most people just drank whatever coffee was available at the office/restaurant/convenience store. Now it's hard to find a bookstore that doesn't offer at least something, and there are small coffee shops all over the place doing a great business. Good coffee is no longer limited to the bohemian crowd.

      Before people bitch about Starbucks taking up 90% of the gourmet coffee market, they need to realize that the market basically wouldn't exist if it weren't for them.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
    18. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >A highstreet coffee shop that has been going for years might not be able to survive if it loses all its tourist trade,

      So its the tourists fault for supporting the small coffee store in the first place and then moving over to StarBucks?

      Any coffee store can be supported by the locals, it just depends how much the locals want to pay. Are you willing to pay $10 for a cup of coffee?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    19. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by six11 · · Score: 1

      My post here is -5 Offtopic, read accordingly:

      I'm a big fan of coffee shops. I don't really mind 'corporate chain' shops like Starbucks, Caribou, or (here in Colorado) Peaberry's. In the abstract, of course I prefer the independent shop. In my experience, indy coffee shops are generally staffed by punks, who give the vibe that you should be lucky that they will sell you coffee, and in the process possibly transfer some of their tatooed hipness. Indy shops apparently think that if they cleaned their floor, bathroom, or windows once in a while, that's an indication of selling out. Again, this is all in my experience. I suspect the reason that chain coffee shops do so well has to do with not only economies of scale but also the consistent level of quality and cleanliness. And location. Location is key. There's a Starbucks right outside the main bus station in downtown Denver. When I get to work in the morning I could either get a coffee there or go to the indy shop right next to my building.

      This is what happened the last time I went in the indy shop next to my building. I walked in and stood up at the counter. Nobody else was in the place. The dude behind the counter was preparing sandwiches or something, jamming out to Phish. He saw me come in--we had eye contact. I stood there for half a minute (which is a while, if you play it out) and he said, "I'll be with you in a sec". He continued to do the sandwich thing until he was done--took roughly four minutes. He then took the big platter of sandwiches into the back, wrapped it in saran wrap or something, then came out to me. "What?" he said. Really. Not "Sorry for making you wait for like six minutes." Not "What can I get for you". It was just a half-stoned stare and a throaty "What", as if I were annoying him.

      Needless to say, I haven't been back to that particular place, even though it's location is much more convenient than the starbucks' location. This is representative of my impression of indy coffee shops.

      A good indy shop (unfortunately, a bit far from home at the moment) is Troubador's in Earl's Court.

      gabe

    20. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that due to the increased demand for coffee, a better cafe can do quite well sandwiched between two Starbucks.

      We've got a Starbucks in my office building, and a Starbucks at the corner, and people still walk to Madeline's or Peet's a block away. They're chains too, but Peet's only took off after Starbucks.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    21. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by cascadefx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, I'll bite.

      The mom and pop's can't compete due to VOLUME. Walmart can buy at higher volumes. They can also hire more people (at low wages... who in turn can't afford to shop anywhere but Walmart). They also have more corporate backing to push them into places where they aren't wanted. To say that the consumers decide is a bit of a joke. It takes heavy sustained resistance to keep one out (as just happened in California), but Walmart can keep coming back again and again, plus they can advertise the shit out of their image and try to sway public opinion in the meantime.

      Mom and Pops have a hard (if not impossible) time competing with that.

    22. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by swb · · Score: 1

      Did they feature "gourmet" coffee, espresso, or was it just better-than-average coffee?

      We had a number of hippie cafes prior to the "good coffee" phenom, but they served food and just plain coffee, instead of just baked goods and coffee products like your now-common "coffee shop".

    23. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >The mom and pop's can't compete due to VOLUME. Walmart can buy at higher volumes. They can also hire more people (at low wages... who in turn can't afford to shop anywhere but Walmart). They also have more corporate backing to push them into places where they aren't wanted. To say that the consumers decide is a bit of a joke.

      Walmart/Starbucks buy at higher volumes of things.
      Walmart/Starbucks has more employees.
      Walmart/Starbucks have "corporate backing" (whatever this means, "mom and pops" stores are corporations)

      Then because of these things, the consumer is "forced" to go into Walmart/Starbucks against their will. They, because of the way Walmart/Starbucks is set up, lose their ability to decide if they want to purchase there or not.

      Could you please explain this logic? I can't see how any of the 3 points lead to your conclusion.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    24. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by unperson · · Score: 1

      Parent, you nailed it!

      ...but maybe some people like to get coffee at a place where they're not treated like they're interupting the employees by wanting to order. Or, they can get service even though they happen to be in a good mood and aren't wearing a completely black outfit to show that they're deep, dark people. IT'S FUCKING COFFEE PEOPLE! COFFEE! THEY SELL COFFEE!!

      This is exactly why I don't cry anyone a river when "trendy coffee shop X" gets stomped out of business with a place that provides a better overall experience (no smoking, a generally clean appearance, friendly staff, drive through service,...etc).

      Show me a locally run coffee shop that runs an operation which pleases a large group of customers, and I'll show you a coffee shop which isn't at risk of being "muscled" out of business by Starbucks.

    25. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Iduno what gourmet coffee is, but they certainly served espresso & cappuccino.

      Dunno where I read it recently, but I'm pretty sure the current style espresso maker with steam piston thingy was only perfected (in Italy) around 1950.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    26. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by danharan · · Score: 2, Funny
      I actually look forward to visiting Canada every now and then so I can enjoy "decent" coffee at Tim Hortons (I'm sure many Canidians reading this are laughing their ass off right now).
      Yup, LMAO. Not only does our beer kick ass, you look forward to drinking the worst coffee we brew.
      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    27. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      more likely both. eventually the two starbucks will begin competing against each other, and one will close.

    28. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by welloy · · Score: 1
      While you do have a point, i've been stared down quite a few times in coffee shops because of my lack of piercing or whatnot, they are not all that way. Just like anything else (shock!) there are good ones and bad ones. There are jerks in every profession.

      Two friendly local coffee shops:

      One

      Two

    29. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Corbets · · Score: 1

      Aside from his obvious temper problem, I gotta agree with this guy. Too many people are against "the corporation" just because it is a corporation. And while I frequent all sorts of coffee shops, the chains are the only ones where I can count on getting a fairly quick cup of coffee without waiting on the barista to finish his homework...

    30. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Doogie5526 · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah! I love Dunkin' Donuts coffee so much more than Starbucks. (I believe their coffee predates Starbucks, at least in my area)

    31. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Why don't you guys just not buy their coffee? I mean its not like Starbucks employees storm the mom & pop places and force everyone into the starbuck's at gunpoint. People stand voluntarily in line at the place waiting to give starbuck's their money. Starbucks doesn't put the mom and shop places out of buisness - the customers did. They stopped spending their money at the mom & pop place and decided to give it to starbuck's instead by their own free will.

      I hate corporate scumbags as much as the next guy. But even more, I hate the sheep-people who voluntarily decide to spend their money at the corporate chain and then blame the corporates for the results of their own (the sheep-people's) decisions...

    32. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by cruelworld · · Score: 1

      In this messed up world we call north america "gourmet coffee" is described as coffee made from arabica beans. "Regular" coffee is from robusta.

      Gourmet coffee should mean good, high-quality coffee from a single-tree estate grown at a high altitude with good soil, processed with care and high standards and above all freshly roasted.
      Blending coffee is averaging down - it averages good coffee with poor coffee to create medicore coffee. Starbucks and any large coffee chain does it to maintain a standard taste to their coffee (the "brand" experience) and so as to not be dependant on any single vendor.

      A good Costa Rica La Minita Tarrazu is a good gourmet coffee. Hawaiian Kona is very trendy but not worth the hype. I'm a big fan of Guatemala Antigua and Ethiopian Harar is pretty good too. Had excellent luck with Mexican Oaxaca Pluma - and it's cheap.

    33. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by TheMeddler · · Score: 1

      Dead On. When I was in college {huge -over 40,000- state university, small town -under 100,000-} we wound drinking coffee and studying at *Denny's* before finals - there was no late-night alternative (other than drinking at the apartment, which we did too). They have four Starbucks' there now and 11 independent shops that didn't exist a decade ago.

      Just because a big city (e.g. San Francisco) has a boatload of coffee houses doesn't do the rest of the backasswards country any good. I can get decent coffee, air conditioning, and a comfortable seat in a Starbucks almost anywhere now. I go to local places too, but I'm damned glad Starbucks is around. Kind of like the old Holiday Inn commercials - you know what you are going to get, even if it isn't perfect.

      --
      90% Professional Slacker
    34. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Exocet · · Score: 1

      As a fellow Portlander, don't group me in your "we". I don't firebomb anything - that's just stupid, especially when you do a crappy job of it.

      Either people will walk the talk and continue going to their favorite local place (Stumptown!) or they will go to Starbucks like the corporate-lovin', bad-coffee-swillin' ignorant masses that they are.

      Question/comment: Because some people really seem to prefer corporate-style coffee, what makes you think they'd go to the local places anyway? Of course, there are a lot of people that are on the fence (myself included) who don't really give a shit - their preference is the local place, perhaps, but when you need a cup and you're in a hurry or whatever, Starbucks will do.

      PS: Despite the fact that Stumptown makes the best coffee, fuck it - give me a cup of Irish Breakfast or Prince of Wales if I can find it.

      --
      Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
    35. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Laroue · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. I am not sure what starbucks sells
      but I do know that it is not coffee. They call it coffee but its not....

      --
      #### ## Laroue ####
    36. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that coffee shop goes under, it's not the fault of Starbucks, but the cheap customers

      Negative. If a coffee shop goes under, it's the coffee shop's fault. If you don't have a robust enough business model to handle some competition across the street, your business won't last and that is your own fault.

    37. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I do hate chain stores as a matter of principle. The way I see it, any local business is going to keep more money within a community than a chain store that sends a certain amount of its profits back to headquarters. It eventually makes its way to the shareholders. Shareholders could be literally anybody, but on the average, they're way better off than all but a few of the people the money would have gone to if it had stayed in the community.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    38. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's incredibly scary that that's modded "+5 Insightful"

    39. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by nat5an · · Score: 1
      One difference at least is that Wal-mart in fact has much lower prices than its competition, whereas Starbucks tends to have equivalent or higher prices than its competition. With Starbucks, you pay a premium for the whole "experience," i.e. the store, the staff, the little Java jackets, the menu, etc. I can't think of anyone in their right mind who would go to a Wal-mart for the experience. Whenever I go there, I go for the cheap prices and try not to make eye contact with the other patrons. :-)

      Starbucks created the market for franchise coffee shops in America, and dominates that market. However, there is a significant amount of room for other firms to compete (with respect to price, menu, service, etc.) Wal-mart took on an existing market and is capable of competing so well with respect to price that people shop there instead. Hence, small businesses go under. It's simple economics.

      In my mind, that's the main difference between the two.

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
    40. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I was shooting for "Funny," but I can hardly help what the moderators decide to do...

    41. Re:Haha. Starbucks. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Starbucks don't really compete with one another so much, because they're all more or less the same inside, and they all serve the same stuff. They have redundancy for load balancing :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. The is NOT the Traveling Salesman problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the Over-Caffienated Idiot Problem.

    Something we may never have a formal proof of unless will develop an entirely new branch of mathematics.

  36. The original Starbucks... by scoot241 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is actually somewhat interesting. The original logo is (in my opinion) better than the one they use for the rest of the country. It's basically a naked mermaid. Now all you see in their logo is her face. The original logo is also brown, not green. I visited Seattle a few months, and personally I think they should have stuck with the old stuff (then again, it kinda makes them look like UPS).

    1. Re:The original Starbucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brown and naked? Janet? *ducks*

    2. Re:The original Starbucks... by OneBigWord · · Score: 1

      You can't mention a naked mermaid without a link.

  37. L'état humain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "('to be different')"

    If this is truly all he can muster the human race is indeed to be pitied.

    Perhaps it would be better if he wore a Tommy Hilfiger t-shirt while traveling...

  38. publicity by smashin234 · · Score: 1
    Some people will do anything for publicity.

    This guy reminds me of Fry from Futurama in the episode where he kept drinking coffee. I wonder if this guy shakes when he is flying over the ocean because the soda doesn't have enough caffeine?

    Either way, its not good when you can be compared to a character on a tv show who is an idiot.

  39. Loser? ... by auburnate · · Score: 5, Insightful
    mod this down if you must, but let me be the one to say what a friggin' complete waste of time. He says he wants to be unique ... freak guy ... hop on one leg, pull out your hair with left hand and slap yourself across the face with right hand and repeat the mantra "no one has done this before, i am unique" ad nausem ...

    Oh wait ... a handful of /.ers are now doing this!!!

    1. Re:Loser? ... by mqx · · Score: 1

      "but let me be the one to say what a friggin' complete waste of time."

      I don't think so: what he's doing actually raises social and cultural awareness: coffee stores may not be the grandest thing in the scheme of the planet, but it gives some real insight into life as it is today - rather than through the eyes of a glossy travel magazine or some other trumped up "we only photograph the monuments" book. At the end of the day, it's all of these little things that tell us a lot about how the world is moving along around us.

    2. Re:Loser? ... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Man, I did this for seventeen minutes. Now I'll never know the love of a woman.

      Bastard!

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    3. Re:Loser? ... by auburnate · · Score: 1

      LOL. Thanks, needed a good laff.

  40. Inspiring by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    This man has inspired me. I shall now visit every H&R Block in the country!

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  41. Interesting by secondsun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While the traditionl travelling salesman problem is NPC and anyone who has taken a proper CS track will have heard of it and studied it to death, are there any proofs, algorithims for it when the graph is adding new nodes?

    The biggest thing wrong right now is that when you add a new Vertex to the graph it could change the shortest path between two other verticies.

    Damn I knew I shouldn't have picked up the coffee of the day on my lunch break.(Right now my job is testing the wireless network in several areas so I am wandering around with a laptop surfing /. and gett 12.50 an hour)

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  42. Two in one trip by suso · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Actually, getting two in one day shouldn't be too hard since most of them are across the street from each other.

    1. Re:Two in one trip by suso · · Score: 1

      Uh, that was suposed to be funny, not insightful.

    2. Re:Two in one trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pass _four_ Starbucks on my 2 mile commute. (Redmond, WA)

      Also, not far away is an intersection with Starbucks on three of the four corners. One standalone, one inside grocery store, one inside bookstore. (Woodinville, WA)

  43. Free Coffee! by FedToTheDogs · · Score: 0

    Deal! This One Time Only, Mention SCO, Get +1

  44. If only he knew about Tim Horton's... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    Then he wouldn't be making the dumb trip for bad coffee.

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  45. Mr. Caffeine by general_re · · Score: 4, Funny
    His website...has pictures of the 4000+ Starbucks he's visited.

    Presumably his camera has some serious jitter correction built in...

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    1. Re:Mr. Caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably his camera has some serious jitter correction built in...

      Votes "general re" for making a boring bashing fest about Starbucks worth reading.

  46. What's he selling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a Starbucks withing a block of me, maybe I'll buy whatever he's peddling.

  47. Fortune article, pseudo last names by ebh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    He's getting more press these days. There's an article in Fortune about him.

    Also, the name he goes by is simply "Winter". The only reason he has the "John Smith" in his name is because too many things (like the DMV) break when presented with a single name.

    He is also a fairly good tournament Scrabble player. Because the National Scrabble Association's database can't handle single names either, he's registered as "Winter ZXQKJ".

    1. Re:Fortune article, pseudo last names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fortune article is already linked in the original submission.

    2. Re:Fortune article, pseudo last names by ebh · · Score: 1

      Whoops, my bad.

    3. Re:Fortune article, pseudo last names by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The DMV breaks? At the very least, California's does not. I have a friend whose driver's license clearly states that his name is "Rodent" - and yes, it was issued that way from the CA DMV.

      He gets a lot of mail addressed to "rodent rodent" because of the problem with a lack of support for single-name persons, however.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  48. Re:let me be the first to say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahaha 0wn3d.

    Kind of like the old argument: "Your bitchin is driving me up the friggin wall!" "Well, what are you doin right now?"

  49. Not to be different -- to be famous by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a sad indictment of society that people have some desperate need to be different and decide that the best way to satisfy that urge is to do something completely pointless like purchase products at every store of a multinational conglomerate. How exactly is becoming a complete and utter corporate slave a demonstration of how unique you are? I'd be much more impressed if this guy was attempting to visit every NON-Starbucks coffee shop. But that wouldn't garner him headlines, would it?

    Let's face it: this guy doesn't want to be different, he wants to be famous, in his own pathetic way. You want to be different? How about volunteering for your local chapter of the non-profit organization of your choice? Not too many people do that. If that's not different enough for you, how about starting your own non-profit organization? Even fewer people do that. Hell, as long as you have this need to show everyone how different you are, might as well make it something that can benefit someone other than Starbuck's shareholders. Of course, none of these causes would get him a mention on slashdot, or the evening news, or anything else.

    Call me a party-poorer but when I see stories about people following such pathetic attempts at gaining recognition, it makes me want to retch.

    GMD

    1. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by pubjames · · Score: 1


      I agree. It is sad when you think he is visiting other countries to go to Starbuck, because it is pretty much the same verywhere in the world.

      Starbucks in Tokyo is pretty much the same as Starbucks in London. But Tokyo and London are fascinating.

      A very sad hobby this man has.

    2. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by argmanah · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Let's face it: this guy doesn't want to be different, he wants to be famous, in his own pathetic way. You want to be different? How about volunteering for your local chapter of the non-profit organization of your choice? Not too many people do that. If that's not different enough for you, how about starting your own non-profit organization? Even fewer people do that. Hell, as long as you have this need to show everyone how different you are, might as well make it something that can benefit someone other than Starbuck's shareholders. Of course, none of these causes would get him a mention on slashdot, or the evening news, or anything else.


      Why is it that every time someone gets recognition for doing something that's not particularly useful, someone like you has to come along and insult his hobby and talk down to him about doing something more productive with his time.

      Do you ever watch TV? Maybe you spend that time volunteering. Do you ever read Slashdot? Maybe you should spend that time volunteering. It's a ridiculous double standard you are setting when you and everyone else does pointless things to entertain themselves in their spare time, but when he chooses an activity that garners him some attention he is immediately admonished for not spending that time being productive instead.

      Don't be a hater.

      --
      Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
    3. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      better watch out; I got mod'd to 4, then down to 0 (troll!) for saying the same thing. I added the enviromental damage he's causing in his STUPID quest too though - that might have been where I lsot people. Eh, who wants clean air.

    4. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by whorfin · · Score: 1

      There is one difference between Starbucks in Japan and the US.

      You see, Japanese Coffee Cup so small.
      You Americans have such humungous burbous Coffee Cup

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    5. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by LookSharp · · Score: 1

      I see stories about people following such pathetic attempts at gaining recognition, it makes me want to retch.

      I agree. This guy makes almost elicits pity from me, until I realize he's 32, been doing this for 7 years, and should know better by now.

      I hope his "Internet girlfriend" gets some self-confidence, finds a real boyfriend, and this guy ends up fading out of any semblence of public notoriety.

      This is SAD. This is nothing to report on, be heartened by, or even mildly entertained by. Well, maybe it could be entertaining, if you're into human misery. :)

    6. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by ebh · · Score: 1

      Jeez, it's the guy's HOBBY. There doesn't HAVE to be a point to it. He's been doing it for a long time, and until very recently, it drew almost no attention.

      For any hobby you can think of, there will people who think it's pathetic, or that they're doing it for some ulterior motive other than "because it's there". No matter. He doesn't need anyone's permission to do this, and it's not hurting anything, so why get your panties in a twist?

    7. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      party poorer!

    8. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by (trb001) · · Score: 1

      Perhaps "different" was the wrong word to use. I'm guessing he meant "shocking". People often misuse different, explaining that they want to do something different when, in fact, all they want to do is something that registers a reaction.

      --trb

    9. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by operagost · · Score: 1

      Yes, but only the Philly Main Line has a ROUND Starbucks!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Mastadonic!

    11. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isnt that because your post WAS a troll? and a pretty sad one at that.

    12. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why is it that every time someone gets recognition for doing something that's not particularly useful"

      not particularly useful eh? how about not f***** useful at all you asshat?

      you are just as lame as the Starbuck's whore!

    13. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by Corbets · · Score: 1

      For the record, I don't think he's paying. He seems to be asking for free cups of coffee. Not that I disagree that it's pathetic....

      And volunteering for a non-profit organization, while noble, is hardly different - it's all the rage among college organizations and many many others.

      Finally, I see volunteers on the news all the time, although not very often on CNN. Don't be so quick to dis!

    14. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by teromajusa · · Score: 1

      "Why is it that every time someone gets recognition for doing something that's not particularly useful, someone like you has to come along and insult his hobby and talk down to him about doing something more productive with his time. "

      If he was doing something like building a model of the Louvre out of toothpaste I'd agree with you. But when someone picks something as utterly pointless and dull as visiting every Starbucks, the impulse to yell at them is understandable.

    15. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You honestly think he's doing this for the fame? I'm sure at a certain point in his life, he simply realized he had been to quite a few Starbucks and just decided to make that his thing. Is it the most admirable choice as a life goal in the larger scheme of things? Of course not, but he's definitely not alone. We all do ultimately pointless things to make our lives more interesting/enjoyable. If anyone should understand this, it's nerds. Do you collect anything? Are you a fanboy of some variety? From your previous posts I'd say you're a serious Trekkie. You should probably STFU and take a serious look at your own life and your own vain pursuits. Don't shit on this guy's parade.

    16. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by ky11x · · Score: 1

      yes, you are a party pooper. why do people do anything? 'cause it's fun. you are not a slave to corporations unless you think you are. if this guy finds doing what he does fun and a good way to use his energy, then good for him. that's what hobbies and geeky interests are all about. your criticism of his efforts to enjoy himself is more "pathetic" by far.

    17. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Yes. For someone interested in coffee, he could have visited these. Although the Bedford coffee pot house is in sad shape these days, it is being repaired.

    18. Re:Not to be different -- to be famous by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Interesting. If you want to be truly unique, you've got six billion ways to do it wrong.

      The world would be a much better place if we would get beyond the idea that famous == important. When we make that mistake, we start believing that grabbing headlines means we're doing something right.

      I think it was Ronald Reagan who said, "It's amazing what you can accomplish when you don't care who gets the credit."

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  50. End of the Universe by tbmaddux · · Score: 1

    Arch-ranter Lewis Black has a funny bit about finding a "Starbucks across from a Starbucks" and he declares that to be the end of the universe. They're in Houston, Texas. Also shown in a composite photograph on another website.

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  51. $8 a cup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. This chap is a freak by [000000] · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This chap is a freak, nuff said.

    NEXT >

  53. What a retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't think of a more retarded way to waste your precious time.

    1. Re:What a retard by nysus · · Score: 1

      I can: read his website.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    2. Re:What a retard by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1
      Posting on /.?

      Oh, wait a minute...

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

  54. Hobby by thePMG · · Score: 1

    Everyone needs a hobby...I guess.

  55. A benefactor,hmm.. who could that be? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    You mean a benefactor like... STARBUCKS??? I am certain that they have at least considered sponsoring this guy under the table, just because of the publicity he's getting for them.

    --
    stuff |
  56. Yay for Starbucks... by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    ....the freaking McDonald's of the Coffee world.

    I can say this because i grew up in the PacNW, dammit!!

    There are FAR better places to get coffees than Starbucks, without the pretentious attitude and self-illuministic trumpeting (Go Dutch Bros.!!), but unfortunately it is Starbucks that seems to spread all over, along with the attitude. What is in the syrup that makes people suddenly an Espresso Afficianado after their 3rd visit to Starbucks?

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  57. Human Psychology by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I'm no psychologist, but I do wonder why people are driven to collect things, and, very often, they are driven to the point of mental illness. For example, people went nuts over those McDonalds Beanie Babies a while ago. Trash cans were filled with Happy Meals discarded uneaten, because people wanted only that 15-cent imported toy. Visiting every Starbucks is no different, where a person spends personal resources just playing catch-up to someone else's marketing scheme. I wish people were more resistent to this "collector's disease."

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  58. What are you getting? by iamacat · · Score: 1

    I am paying $1.62 for a grande.

  59. Re:let me be the first to say.... by internic · · Score: 5, Funny
    What's the point?!?!?!

    Is this a test sir?

    Anything you order is free sir. Don't worry, it's clean sir.

    Your sure this isn't a test, sir? You were in here last Tuesday, standing right where you are now. You asked, "how good is security?" It's excellent sir, tight as a drum.

    You said if anyone came asking, we'd have to mod him down, even you. This is a powerful gesture, sir.

    --
    "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
  60. finite improbability by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    If he could generate enough finite improbability, he could simultaneously appear in every Starbucks in the universe, and accomplish his goal.

    He just needs a cup of really hot tea for his atomic vector plotter. Does Starbucks serve tea?

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:finite improbability by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1
      They do in the UK.

      Unbelievably it's actually worse than their coffee.

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

  61. Say... by devphaeton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anyone read what his hit counter said when the article was first posted?

    I saw it at 64105 at 11:21 CST.

    I hit reload and it's up over 65K now.

    Watching the /. effect in RealTime!

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  62. Anyone do the math? by Caballero · · Score: 1


    Did anyone else do the math?

    He's visited over 4000 locations in 7 years. That works out to about 11 locations a week.

    Starbucks is opening an average of 10 stores a week.

    The guy is doomed if he doesn't really pick up the pace.

  63. Interesting Problem, though. by treehouse · · Score: 1

    True, it's not the Travelling Salesman problem, but it is interesting. In the beginning, the challenge is to drink at every Starbucks in town and then move to the next town. But as you begin to succeed, the appearance of new stores insures that the average Starbucks density, worldwide, grows smaller. So small that, at some point, it may be impossible to traverse in one week all the new Starbucks that are being built in that week. Unless, of course, they are all built in the same town. And then you can declare a victory and go back to more meaningful pursuits such as sky diving or trainspotting.

  64. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We thank you for your confession of intent to firebomb. We will send a representative shortly to your residence to collect you.

    Department of Homeland Security

  65. Das Bus by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    Considering I dislike Starbucks coffee intensely (I vastly prefer Dunkin Donuts, alas unavailable on the west coast), and I have nocturnal habits, I feel more of a kinship with Project Dennys.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  66. I used to work at Starbucks... by justkarl · · Score: 1

    ...Back in the day. We had this guy who worked there, crazy about starbucks. He invited Winter to our store(after we opened), and told him that there would be a big party for him when he came. About a year later, when the crazy guy(Jacob) had been separated from the company, Winter came to the store, and said, "Where's the balloons? Jacob said there'd be balloons." So he checked out our place, did his thing...

    Lately, starbucks released a statement saying that they're flattered by this, but other than that, they don't give him much...

    1. Re:I used to work at Starbucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can top that... I used to work with "Winter" himself (before AND after he changed his name) at a software company in Plano, TX.

      And yes, he's just as much of a freakazoid as you'd think.

      I am, of course, personally devastated that he has managed a Slashdot mention before me, and for such a silly project, no less.

  67. in Roget's, it would be called by nusratt · · Score: 1

    'sisyphean'.
    ("an average of 10 new stores are opened per week")

  68. Dunkin' Donuts yum by erf · · Score: 1

    Much better coffee than starbucks, at least the regular stuff, I don't care for flavored coffee.

  69. What motivates him? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can understand this.

    I, myself, have a desire to visit every McDonalds on the face fo the planet.

    But first I have to buy a bulldozer, and a cargo plane to carry it between continents...

  70. Go piss up a rope by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    Zen is everywhere. It's in a commune, it's in a boardroom, it's in what you flush down the toilet.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  71. Oblig. by fizban · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Starbucks of Topeka, Kansas? Starbucks #2046 of Topeka, Kansas?

    "Err... Yes"

    "You're a jerk, Starbucks. A real kneebiter."

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  72. If you're going to do this.... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    and by this I mean "Visit every location of store X," why not make it more meaningful, like visit all of the Brothels in Las Vegas?

    This guy should have set up some kind of pay-per-impression advertising before making slashdot, in any case..

  73. Resume is a doc !!! by iMaple · · Score: 1

    He is a a contract computer programmer and I guess looking out for jobs and he posts his resume on his (very stable .. no /.ing yet !!)site as a DOC file ??? Common this isnt a medical convention where people appreciate docs. The last ver of Word I used (maybe 2000) had a save as html option. Atleast a 10 mb html ( u know with all the extra MS tags and crap) file would be better than a doc if u really want people to read your stuff.

    1. Re:Resume is a doc !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is wierd , someone out there actually uses MS crap .... Wait I see the relation Starbucks ..... Seattle .... MS .... crap

  74. Geez, lighten up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know the secret to happiness and I'll bet you don't either. Maybe this guy's found his own. I'm happy for him, anyway. :)

  75. Mod Parent Up by mad.frog · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh, to have mod points today...

  76. WTH? by cjpez · · Score: 1
    "I think what he's doing is great--very admirable," says Jodi Morgan...
    admirable?
    "I can't foresee myself stopping." Winter stares into the bright Phoenix sun. "It's too rewarding an experience."
    rewarding?

    These people are obviously using some strange meanings of these words that I've been completely unaware of until now.

  77. Ugh. by blair1q · · Score: 1


    Has America run out of INTERESTING things to do?

    1. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's right. Because one freak decides to do something strange and useless, that OBVIOUSLY means that every other American citizen has all of a sudden got sweet fuckall to do.

      Where are you from? I bet we could find a whole pack of boring rejects to generalise you and your family. If it's even necessary to look beyond you, that is.

  78. Higher prices, more buyers... by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it was Whirlpool who made a middle of the road washer and dryer set. They didn't sell very well, so they upped the price over 1 grand each and they sold like crazy.

    I think this is the same phenomenon we are seeing with Starbucks coffee, and the proliferation of legion's of coffee related drinks ending with chino or latte.

  79. Isn't it a Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So technically StarBucks does not own them. I wonder if he went to the Starbucks across from the StarBucks that Lewis Black talked about in his show.

  80. Just Another Addict by ravingsanity · · Score: 1

    "After about four stores, the coffee loses all taste," says Winter, who's unconcerned about any long-term effects of so much coffee. "It doesn't taste good at all--I'm not enjoying drinking it. After an extreme number of stores, I have to wash out the taste with water after every sip because it's starting to make me sick."

    He's acting just like a drug addict but in his case his drug of choice just happens to be legal. He sleeps in his car in parking lots, he zips from dealer to dealer all day long in order to get his next fix which he doesn't even enjoy and he works just enough to support his habit. Yup, sounds like druggie behavior to me (i.e. "gotta go work more so I can make more money to buy more drugs so I can work more and make more money to buy drugs so I can work more", etc, etc, ad infinitum, ad nauseum).

    The thing that stuns me is that he has a girlfriend that's dated him online for six months! What the hell must be her damage and what the hell is wrong with him that he'd rather keep visiting these sterile shops peddling their mediocre coffee than spend time with her?! This man needs an intervention to help him get his priorities in order.

    --
    I tried to dial REALITY once and I was informed that it had been disconnected.
    1. Re:Just Another Addict by Schmoopie · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why do you find the "online girlfriend" situation so stunning? And why the assumption that she is somehow "damaged?"

    2. Re:Just Another Addict by ravingsanity · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that relationships that are purely online are destined to fail (same as long-distance relationships) over time. "Damaged" may be a harsh term, but I have to wonder about the sanity of anyone that would date someone who is obsessed as this man obviously is. He clearly has no concern for his own health and if he has so little concern for himself, how can he properly care for another person? Obsession in any form is not a healthy thing which leads me to question his sanity and, by proxy, hers.

      But take all this with a bag of salt because it is just my view and it takes all kinds to make the world go around.

      --
      I tried to dial REALITY once and I was informed that it had been disconnected.
  81. The really sad thing is... by mark2003 · · Score: 1

    ...that the Starbucks on Englands Lane, Belsize Park, London featuring in his photos used to be a nice pub.

    Now that would a much more sensible and understandable challenge, have a drink in every pub...

    1. Re:The really sad thing is... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      The one on hampstead high st used to be a pizza-hut maybe that balances it out? But even worse - drinking in every pub would have actually been cheaper!

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  82. Math?? by Spackler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, he has had 7 years
    2555 days
    Thats an average of 1.5655577299412915851272015655577 starbucks per day.
    Opening 10 per week, and he is hitting 10.958904109589041095890410958899 per week.
    They have 8000 stores now.
    I calculate about 13 more years, and he should be able to enter maintenance.

    Therefore, he is ahead of the curve.

  83. Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all...

  84. programmer malfunction by Nuttles · · Score: 1

    While most programmers handle their addiction by finding the closest coffee shop to fuel their addiction, this programmer has a bug and seems to think that once a coffee shop(starbucks) is visited it cannot be visited again. Aside from the traveling salesman issue here, this guy has broken an important rule of any good programmer...TO GET STUFF DONE IN THE SIMPLIEST, EASIEST WAY POSSIBLE (Translation, LAZINESS)

    To each his own

    Nut

  85. D00d, he's like the embodiment of it! by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Here you have a travelling salesman who is trying to execute the algorithm manually! Like by actually walking it! He's one who won't put up with dumb comments like "well, when I was your age, we had to run our algorithms on punchcards; did you ever see a punchcard, kid?" or "Real men program in assembler". No, as this brave man proves it, real men program the real world! The real world rulez! Feet are the ultimate CPU: they MOV, they MULL, they ADD(uct), they DIVe, and can actually perform several of those instructions in parallel. Feet are a standard and every man, woman, and child come equipped with a dual-proc rig that delivers exceptional real-world performance. Not only that, but a multitude of software packages, created by the F/OSS (Foot Operating System Software) project, distributed under the GPL (Going Places License). Many games can be played on it, like Soccer, Foot(c)ball, Twister, and the ever popular Naked Twister. More mundane applications, like the travelling salesman problem, can be solved in finite time, as demonstrated by our Starbucks traveller, and many annoying Avon representatives.

    1. Re:D00d, he's like the embodiment of it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, this is the best post I've read in a while :)

  86. Impressive, important and cool project! by redwoodtree · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I spent a while surfing his site which suprisingly wasn't /.'d into oblivion. After about 5 minutes I was convinced the guy is brilliant.

    This is an amazing and important piece of work. The sheer volume of pictures, the sheer enormity of this effort is so impressive that I think this has to go down as one of those pieces of art/documentary/social commentary/lark that if it's preserved, people will look back on in 50 or 100 years (maybe less , maybe more) and just find terribly facinating.

    First of all, just the pictures of all the architecture of locations in all 50 states alone is amazing. It's absolutely insane once you realize how much revenue and commerce Starbucks generates (all politics and love and hate of the company aside, it's just amazing when you see them all in one web site). Thes buildings had to be constructure, outfitted, opened, etc. The record of all these buildings, all these locations is like a mini snapshot of the whole U.S. from coast to coast and then world wide as well. It's an amazing piece of compare and contrast, and an amazing document.

    Coming at it from the other side, I think the guy is a great artist also. This definitely qualifies as art in my mind, bordering on journalism, bordering on madness which is where a lot of great art comes from. Think of how many stories each state/city/area of a city/district tell about this experience, picture him going from store to store documenting this, etc. It's an endless story, he could write a book about it. Others have mentioned on here how comedians like Lewis Black have also seized on the sheer crazyness of the Starbucks phenomenon. Artists bring these issues into focus for people and the number of people critizing him here make me feel even stronger about the fact that he's doing something cool.

    Winter is alright in my book. I don't think he's ruining the environment by travelling , I don't think he's a nut and don't think it's a waste of time. It's actually quite an important piece of work. Congratulations man.

    1. Re:Impressive, important and cool project! by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for most of /. when I say:

      What, are you insane?

    2. Re:Impressive, important and cool project! by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

      I'm not the one who built 13 starbucks locations within one mile of each other, so I would say, no I'm not insane. I think at some point in the future someone is going to need to look back at this and realize that our entire society was insane.

  87. Speaking of being "Unique" by warriorpostman · · Score: 1

    This might be offtopic but ... A friend of mine said that the "baristas" at Starbucks create the "unique" taste of coffee, by roasting the beans longer than average. I recently bought a regular non-flavored coffee there, and was able to confirm that they do, in fact, burn their coffee. Maybe this is something true connoisseurs appreciate, but as far as I'm concerned it's "burning". Call it "dark roasting" call it a "feature enhancement".

    Then again, what do I know...I put cream and sugar in my coffee.

  88. Obligatory 'Best in Show' Quote by Psymunn · · Score: 1

    "We met at Starbucks. Not at the same Starbucks. We saw each other at different Starbucks across the street from each other."

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  89. Similar to certain English people... by FromWithin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He sounds like he'd get on very well with Dave Gorman, who, after a drunken bet, made it his goal to find 52 other people named Dave Gorman, and also got a bit obsessed with Googlewhacking.

    Also Danny Wallace who after having bet Dave Gorman to find 52 Dave Gorman's got it into his head that he needed 1000 people to join him , without actually knowing what they were joining (there are now over 8000 joinees).

    And then of course there is the inimitable Tony Hawks (not Tony Hawk) who needed to win a bet that he could hitch-hike around the entire coast of Ireland with a refridgerator.

    All of their books are highly recommended (especially Join Me, which is the funniest book I've ever read.

  90. What is Winter's slashdot #...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has to be in the teens, this guy is an uber geek.

  91. Repeat? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

    Okay ...

    Is this supposed to be some kind of update?
    'Cause I swear I've seen this here before.

    If not here ...
    This is certainly not a "new" story.

    Are /. standards slipping? :)

    Cheers,
    --The Dude

  92. Chapters Bookstores in Canada by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1
    Has he been to Canada? There are starbucks in three Chapters bookstores that I know of, in Dartmouth and Halifax, Nova Scotia, and St. John's Newfoundland.

    It's tough for most cafes in Canada, because Canadians seem to prefer Tim Hortons. For comparison, I live in Truro, which is a medium sized town, and there are seven Tim Hortons here.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  93. The best quote from the article by Pragmatix · · Score: 1

    This line is especially precious: "I think what he's doing is great--very admirable," says Jodi Morgan, a 27-year-old who has been in an online relationship with Winter since January. " Nothing says winner like admiration from your "online relationship"

    1. Re:The best quote from the article by Schmoopie · · Score: 1

      The project is great and very admirable. Imagine all of the endurance, motivation, patience one would have to have and sacrifices one would have to make to embark on a journey such as the one Winter is taking. I applaud his hobby/obsession/way of life/whatever else you want to call it and am planning on supporting him throughout his adventure.

  94. Real news by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    Gotta love that Headline News. Ever since the merger they avoid any type of real news like the plague. And the average age of the news presenters is, what, 13?

    I grew up in the United States. What is this "real news" you speak of?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Real news by untaken_name · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I grew up in the United States.

      It's apparent.

      What is this "real news" you speak of?

      Corrected:

      "What is this 'real news' of which you speak?"

      Perhaps your primary statement excuses your poor grammar. (no, I'm not referring to an indigent ancestor)

    2. Re:Real news by PurpleBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      In English, you can end sentences with prepositions. The rule saying you can't was made up by scholars in previous centuries who thought English was derived from Latin (it isn't at all), and also thought that any deviation from Latin grammar was an error (and even if English came from Latin, why the hell would that be true?) Linguistics was not well understood then, so scholars thought that it ought to be possible to translate word-for-word from Latin to English.

      Specifically, in English, you ask many questions by moving the object (often "what") to the front of the sentence, and leaving nothing in its place. (Examples: "You are doing what?" goes to "What are you doing?", and "You are talking about what?" goes to "What are you talking about?")

      This can indeed leave a preposition at the end of the sentence. Moving the preposition as well is also allowed, but is much less common. (Any English speaker would find "About what are you talking?" to sound stilted.) The preposition at the end of the sentence still has a referent, it's just in another place, and this kind of movement occurs in many languages, as any linguistics course will tell you.

      The only reason you couldn't do this in Latin is because the preposition was PART OF THE WORD, so of course you had to move it with the word. It's a lot like split infinitives, another classic grammatical non-error: Caesar couldn't have split an infinitive if he had tried.

      And so your post had no point except to be elitist about a point whose only basis is in discredited 19th-century linguistics. Don't you feel special?

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    3. Re:Real news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pwned!

    4. Re:Real news by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      ehehehe. and you, of course, decided to correct my purportedly incorrect pedantry with your purportedly correct pedantry...then call me elitist and ask if *I* feel special... do you not know the meaning of hypocrisy or do you just like being a hypocrite?
      To answer your question, yes. I do, in fact, feel special. I am sure you would like know how it feels, and I hope that one day you will manage it.

      I also like how you assert that "(Any English speaker would find "About what are you talking?" to sound stilted.)" I do not. Please remember, the post to which you replied was written in English. I label myself an "English speaker." I am perfectly comfortable with many modes of diction and do not find proper English stilted if it is uttered in a natural tone and rhythm. Proper English (and here I am using the term in a way to which you undoubtedly object; please do not bother telling me so) can, of course, be *made* to sound stilted, which many lazy comedians have proved over the years. (The scene(s) in Beavis and Butt-head do America are classic, and are excepted from the previous statement.)

    5. Re:Real news by pangloss · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of impertinence up with which I shall not put.

    6. Re:Real news by Infonaut · · Score: 1
      You make an excellent point, but were grammatically correct, I wouldn't be a good representative of the average ill-informed and uneducated American. Thus the staggering humor of my post would have been lessened, and we would all be worse off.

      The above comment contains attempted humor, and I apologize in advance for any errors in spelling, grammor, or thinking.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    7. Re:Real news by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Right-o! Pray tell me, up with which types of impertinence do you put?

  95. Nah, rather on top! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would rather see him visting places where they have placed starbucks on top of other starbucks.

    1. Re:Nah, rather on top! by TheMeddler · · Score: 1

      Simpson's Did It. (the episode where Bart gets a tattoo).

      --
      90% Professional Slacker
  96. What does this have to do with Slashdot? by decep · · Score: 1

    I am still trying to figure out why this was posted to Slashdot. I guess we can expect a story in the near future about how some guy is trying to masturbate in every store of some huge adult novelty chain.

    I do not want to hear or read about this crap!

  97. Let's see... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    ...include the words "programmer" and "coffee" in an article and it MUST tech-related. C'mon, it must be a slow news day.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  98. He'll be finished... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    He'll be finished when he stops in the Starbucks that happens to be Dr. Evil's lair.

    Then he'll be finished. *pinky to corner of mouth* MUAHAHAHA! MUAHAHAHAHA! MUAHAHAHAHAHA! MUAHAHAHA! (*keep laughing until scene fade out*)

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  99. Having Worked with Winter... by ElliotNess · · Score: 1

    he is not a genious, he once flooded an entire floor of an apartment complex by hanging his shirt on a sprinkler head and then breaking it some how.

    ... he once had to be told to remove the hundreds of Starbucks cups from his cubicle.

    ... he only owns 3 shirts (at least as much as I can tell) Look at the pictures.

    ... he sometimes went by the name John, at least when some code was checked into the repository. Maybe this was before he legally changed his name.

    ... he was a strange individual, who worked at odd hours in the night and who eventually came under suspicion by management that "he was up to something."

    ... he worked at a company in Austin, TX that is no longer in business and that is where I met him.

    ... he is definitely not boring and I appreciate that.

    Go Winter Go.

    --
    I only care what two people think, me and God....and I only pretend to care what one of them thinks.
    1. Re:Having Worked with Winter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "he is not a genious"

      neither are you as you can not f**king spell, genius

    2. Re:Having Worked with Winter... by ElliotNess · · Score: 1

      No way I can be, I post to Slashdot. ;)

      Get over the typo, you retarded cow.

      --
      I only care what two people think, me and God....and I only pretend to care what one of them thinks.
  100. Why post your resume on your website like that? by Metal+Remains · · Score: 0

    But it is an impressive 7 PAGES. After two, he'd go in the trash if I was the HR person reading it.

  101. It's not about coffee, it's monopoly and money. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Fairly straightforward. A vist to any Starbucks should pretty much convince you it isn't about coffee at all.

    Last year, *all* of the coffee shops within walking distance became Starbucks and when all the coffee shops are Starbucks then it can become difficult to get a decent cup of coffee without buying your own machine.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  102. standard pedantic reply by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

    no question is begged. it raises the question, but begging the question involves circular logic and other philosophical crap

    1. Re:standard pedantic reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      begging the question involves circular logic and other philosophical crap

      er, philosophical?

      I don't think that word means what you think it means. Either that or you don't actually know what begging the question is, because it has nothing to do with philosophy.

    2. Re:standard pedantic reply by joshds · · Score: 1

      Bartley's English Usage Guide, the technical meaning of "to beg the question" in logic use it in one of two looser senses. The first of these, "to evade the question, to duck the issue", is attested since 1860 (WDEU). The second, "to invite the obvious question, (with an inanimate subject) to raise the question", is now the most commonly heard use of the phrase, although we have found no mention of it prior to The Oxford Guide to English Usage, 1st edition (1983), and it is not yet in most dictionaries. The meaning of the adjective "question-begging" does not seem to have suffered a similar broadening.

      I was going for the latter, which yes does also include 'raise the question.' The mention of his file names calls attention to the fact that he spends too much time on this project (since he doesnt need any kind of naming scheme), and therefore my comment on it is already leading you to my presupposed conclusion, that he spends too much time on this project. Circular anyone?

  103. Starbucks competes on quality by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

    I used to go to neighborhood coffee shops. But I got tired of the wide variation in quality.
    I like strong brewed coffee. But so often, I would pay my US$ 1.50 or so and get
    something that tasted bad.

    When I go to Starbucks, anywhere I happen to be, the brewed coffee is uniformly good.
    Now, if I find my self somewhere other than Starbucks, I order a double espresso, since
    it is harder for someone to do that badly.

    So in my opinion, Starbucks is resorting to providing uniform quality.
    Sounds like unfair competition to me. :)

    Disclaimer: After noticing that there was always a line at Starbucks, I decided to buy stock in them too.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
  104. Twin Farbucks by apankrat · · Score: 2, Informative

    FarFarAway in Shrek-2 has twin Farbucks :)

    Closer to the end of the movie, when that baked
    thing walks to the castle, patrons of one of the
    shops escape in horror across the street .. to
    another Farbucks. Kinda takes a couple of seconds
    to realize that and it makes it twice as funny :)

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
    1. Re:Twin Farbucks by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      "He who laughs last is the slowest thinker"
      - Unknown (especially to me)

  105. Lewis Black by verbatim_verbose · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...and if you walk to the end of the block, there sits a Starbucks. And directly across the street -- in the exact same building as that Starbucks -- there is... another Starbucks. There is a Starbucks across the street from a Starbucks! And ladies and gentlemen, THAT is the end of the universe."

  106. Not Unusual by WebGangsta · · Score: 1
    Back in the early 90's, I ran into a nut^h^h^h guy who was visiting every individual Disney Store in the country.

    At the time, Disney had individualized the stores as much as possible (within a given template), so each store would have unique front window displays and different character figures scattered throughout the stores. He had a large photo album with photos of all the different stores he had been in, documenting the differences.

    Of course, this was before The Disney Stores started to...

    • suck, by changing their merchandise mix from adults/kids clothing/housewares/art to strictly kids merch with the occasional adult sweatshirt thrown in
    • suck, by being implanted in every single mall across the country, instead of isolating to a single storefront in the larger, more touristy-oriented cities making a trip to a Disney Store less of a special thrill and something routine
    • suck, by diluting the brand that The Disney Store had achieved by failing to stock merchandise that folks couldn't also get at their local J.C.Sears-Mart.
    ... prompting Disney to negotiate to sell the stores to a different company. It will be interesting to see, if this deal goes through, if The Disney Stores can reclaim the magic that they had when they first opened.
  107. Traveling Salesman [with] Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, as noted in other posts above, it's not the Travelling Salesman Problem. At all. However, he is travelling, and he clearly has some kind of problem. So, on a purely literalized level... /if only he was actually a salesman

  108. Reread the article -- and my post by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    Why is it that every time someone gets recognition for doing something that's not particularly useful, someone like you has to come along and insult his hobby and talk down to him about doing something more productive with his time.

    argmanah, I don't know if you RTFA or not so let me point out a few choice quotes:

    But I'm not obsessed with Starbucks, mind you. I'm an "enthusiast". My name is Winter, and this site is dedicated to my project to visit every Starbucks in the world, simply to be different.

    It's not even clear that this guy loves Starbucks' coffee. In fact, he takes pains to distance himself from obsession with it. He is very open that his primary motivation for this idiotic escapade is to be different. That's it.

    Strange though my goal might be, it is not nearly as painful as this guy's effort at being different.

    Here he derides some other individual's pathetic attempt at fame, not even realizing that the guy is probably very similiar to him on a psychological level.

    VCR ALERT!
    I'm scheduled for a short interview on CNN Headline News Thusday, July 8, at approximately 7:45 PM EDT.

    As though his pitiful pleas for attention were too subtle for the reader, here he is practially begging people to tune in and watch him.

    Do you ever watch TV? Maybe you spend that time volunteering. Do you ever read Slashdot? Maybe you should spend that time volunteering. It's a ridiculous double standard you are setting when you and everyone else does pointless things to entertain themselves in their spare time, but when he chooses an activity that garners him some attention he is immediately admonished for not spending that time being productive instead.

    I'm not sure you understood the point of my original post. I am not claiming that anyone who doesn't volunteer is a lesser person (and by the way, what makes you think that I *don't* volunteer?). I'm simply stating how sickened I am by this guy's desperate plea for attention and the laughable way he is trying so hard to convince himself that he's not an ordinary person. He reminds me of Meni Savari's character in American Beauty.

    You ask a lot of questions about me. Fine. One of my hobbies is tae kwon do. I've been doing it for years and I'm really into it. I don't do it to be 'different'; I do it because I enjoy doing it. I don't have a website listing what time and place I practice at so that interested parties can come and watch me. I do this for myself. There's no need for me to trumpt my participation in my hobby or my accomplishments.

    Don't be a hater.

    I'm sorry, argmanah, but I guess part of me is a hater. I hate people like this Starbucks' guy as much as I hated all those people who stood up at my high school graduation and, one after the other, each proudly procliamed that "they had walked the road less travelled." Being different should come naturally. If you feel the need to shove your "differentness" down everyone's throat, that's a good indication that you really are just a frightened, ordinary little man at heart.

    GMD

    1. Re:Reread the article -- and my post by argmanah · · Score: 1

      It's not even clear that this guy loves Starbucks' coffee. In fact, he takes pains to distance himself from obsession with it. He is very open that his primary motivation for this idiotic escapade is to be different. That's it.

      Sure, some people have a desire to be different. That desire in itself is what sets them apart from the masses. Sure, his method may not "come naturally", but his desire did.

      At the very least, I have more respect for this guy than the goths you see who are trying to be different by dressing in black and wearing makeup like all the other goths. He, at the very least, is truly non-conformist.

      "Strange though my goal might be, it is not nearly as painful as this guy's effort at being different."

      Here he derides some other individual's pathetic attempt at fame, not even realizing that the guy is probably very similiar to him on a sychological level.


      No, you missed his point entirely. He pokes fun at the other person because he knows they are psychologically similar in their drive, but the other person chose a much more physically painful route, which he feels is clearly a less wise choice than his pointless task.

      I'm not sure you understood the point of my original post. I am not claiming that anyone who doesn't volunteer is a lesser person (and by the way, what makes you think that I *don't* volunteer?). I'm simply stating how sickened I am by this guy's desperate plea for attention and the laughable way he is trying so hard to convince himself that he's not an ordinary person. He reminds me of Meni Savari's character in American Beauty.

      A person who's willing to spend that much time going to every Starbucks is not ordinary by definition.

      You seem to be equating "true differentness" with humility. You implied that a person who's truly different shouldn't have to proclaim it to the world, it should "come naturally". Differentness coming naturally however, does not preclude you from shoving it down people's throats. They are not mutually exclusive qualities. Besides, how humble or in-your-face about your differentness is a difference in and of itself.

      Basically, you're asking someone who is different to conform to your view of what differentness should be and how a "truly different" person should act. That kinda defeats the purpose if you ask me.

      --
      Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
    2. Re:Reread the article -- and my post by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you are truly different, then you won't feel the need to talk about how different you are, because everyone seems to want to do that so much, that it is the status quo. Hence it is not necessary to invoke humility.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Reread the article -- and my post by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      VCR ALERT!

      I'm scheduled for a short interview on CNN Headline News Thusday, July 8, at approximately 7:45 PM EDT.

      As though his pitiful pleas for attention were too subtle for the reader, here he is practially begging people to tune in and watch him.

      And I'm sure when you get your 15 minutes of fame, you won't tell anyone about it.

    4. Re:Reread the article -- and my post by argmanah · · Score: 1

      If you are truly different, then you won't feel the need to talk about how different you are, because everyone seems to want to do that so much, that it is the status quo. Hence it is not necessary to invoke humility.

      You are so full of shit.

      If they were truly different, they wouldn't have to conform to your standard of not talking about how different they are. You can define wanting to talk about how different you are as being the status quo, making not talking about it being different, but if everyone being truly is not talking about it, then it becomes the status quo.

      The bottom line is, any attempt to define talking or not talking about it as the status quo is asinine. He wanted to talk about it, he did. He didn't talk about it because other people expected it of him, he did it because he wanted to. That is enough.

      --
      Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
    5. Re:Reread the article -- and my post by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that saying you're different doesn't make you so. There are a kajillion people out there all claiming to be different, but doing something specifically because it's different isn't different. He can use any excuse to do whatever he likes, but it's still bullshit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Reread the article -- and my post by argmanah · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that saying you're different doesn't make you so. There are a kajillion people out there all claiming to be different, but doing something specifically because it's different isn't different. He can use any excuse to do whatever he likes, but it's still bullshit.

      By your definition then, no one is different. There's a bunch of people doing things different because it's different. They're similar to each other, so they're not different. There's a bunch of people who doing things different by chance or that's just the way they are. Well, they're similar to each other too, so they're not different.

      The very fact that you're setting any standard whatsoever for being different is bullshit, since the whole idea if being different, on purpose or not, is to not conform to a standard.

      --
      Overrated Moderation: This posts sucks... because.
  109. No less than 3 starbucks at Somerset mall by santos_douglas · · Score: 1

    in upscale Troy, Michigan (my home state). I've been there dozens of times and never really even noticed that one fairly normal sized shopping mall needed 3 of these things, amazing. Reminds me of this Simpsons quote:

    "You better hurry up tho, kid, in a few moments this place is becoming a StarBucks."

  110. Wowbagger by MacGod · · Score: 1

    This guy kind of reminds me of Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged, whose goal was to travel the universe and insult everyone in it, in alphabetical order.

    Of course, he had a fantastically complicated on-board spaceship computer to help him figure out how.

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  111. Actually, it's milk by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    IT'S FUCKING COFFEE PEOPLE! COFFEE! THEY SELL COFFEE!!
    Not really! They more sell milk. Think about it. What's a cup of coffee cost? Buck fifty? But now, reduce that cup of coffee to a single tiny shot of espresso and then fill the rest of the cup with milk. Foamy milk, too -- it's mostly air. But now you can charge maybe $3.25. Whenever you hear about outbreaks of hoof and mouth disease and how hundreds of cows need to be put down, don't think about McDonald's ... think about Starbucks.
    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  112. Not that hard actually... by bender647 · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, he can visit 4-5 stores in one shopping plaza alone.

  113. Future locations by bmf033069 · · Score: 1

    Now if he could catch up with all of the existing locations, then he could start taking pictures of the future locations before they are Stackbuckized. That would probably be of more historical and societal importance.

    He could also take a few pictures of the local coffee shops before they go out of business when the Starbucks moves in.

  114. Nescafé by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    Person1: u dont have starbucks there!~?
    Person0: nope
    Person1: u dont!~?
    Person0: and don't bring it here either!
    Person1: i'm sorry thats kinda mind blowin.. haha
    Person1: u dont want 'em either huh
    Person0: we already have Nescaf&#233; and Java stands

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  115. West Coast perspective by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    It's true! Yes, I too was once a left-coast California snob about my coffee, until I went back east with a girlfriend from New Jersey. Couldn't find an acceptable-looking "coffee shop" anywhere. I was "reduced" to grabbing a quick cuppa at a Dunkin Donuts ... and what do you know, they really do have pretty good coffee there. Fellow West Coasters, when you're back East next time, try it out.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  116. The End of the Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The End of the Universe exists in Houston, TX.

    Ever hear of this Lewis Black skit concerning the Starbucks across the street from a Starbucks.

    Check it out here:
    http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/i/d/idg101/starb ucks/

  117. Expensive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more shocked about how much money he must have spent at those $tarbuck$. Think about it. 4000 venues x $25 for a cup of coffee... $100000.00!

  118. oh god, make it stop by SubtleNuance · · Score: 0

    In order 'to be different' he goes to centrally controlled, brand-imaged coffee shops!?

    Does he not realize he is a tool? There is nothing different about starbucks -- its purpose is HOMOGENY !

    has marketroid propaganda finally trumped reality? If he wanted different maybe he should have enjoyed a coffee at any one of the locally owned and operated shops that are being destroyed by the market-power of starsucks.

    oh the irony.

  119. Enjoying That Pointy Stick You're Sitting On? by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Don't be such a Puritanical prig. It's not a reflection of society, much less a "sad indictment". Not everyone agrees that corporations are evil or that the legislated preservation of uneconomic but quaint shops and neighborhoods for the entertainment of the upper classes is useful.

    Give this guy and the rest of us a break, OK? Now, go back to working on your dream of making us all faceless and rule-obeying drones. You know, like we see in bad science fiction movies: The whole world looks like Marin County; everyone has blonde hair and blue eyes and rides a bike; everyone wears white robes and does what they're told and is oh-so happy.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  120. Starbucks? How boring. Try Denny's by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1
  121. Denny's by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the guy trying to visit every Denny's and find Weird Al.

  122. Close to home... by aaamr · · Score: 1

    At first I brushed this story off as just another publicity stunt.... then I actually looked at the webpage and found the starbucks closest to my house (less than a block away).

    Somehow, that made the whole thing a lot more interesting. Here's a guy that's likely been a the majority of people's neighborhoods -- at least in North America.

    Kind of neat.

    1. Re:Close to home... by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      Here's a guy that's likely been a the majority of people's neighborhoods -- at least in North America.


      Make that just the United States. Starbucks is nothing in Canada.

    2. Re:Close to home... by aaamr · · Score: 1

      Not so... I live in Toronto, and the Starbucks I frequent is the one that's half a block from my house.

      Oh sure, there's Timothy's and Second Cup as well, but SB is just too convenient!

    3. Re:Close to home... by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      Sure, we have a couple of Starbucks in London, but the business they do is nothing compared to Timmies. Personally I don't give Starbucks a second look.

  123. Check out his Seattle page by drivers · · Score: 1

    I'd link to it, but since it loads 167 pictures (one for each location) it wouldn't be nice to his server. That doesn't count the 21 he lists as not having visited. (Now imagine adding Seattle's Best Coffee and Tully's which are also prevalent around here...) And I'm sure that he doesn't have a complete list because he has 130th & Aurora but there is also one inside the Albertson's across the street, unless that doesn't count for some reason.

  124. Credit where credit is due by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

    This "end of the universe" joke comes from comedian Lewis Black's stand up routine.

  125. Why? by Muttonhead · · Score: 1

    Who the fuck even cares about this guy's hobby? Slashdot is becoming another NBC Dateline babysitting service. Pathetic!

  126. licensed stores vs corporate owned stores by drivers · · Score: 1

    To answer my own question, he doesn't count licensed stores and that is a licensed store.

  127. A comparison of Canadian and American coffee by talexb · · Score: 1

    I just did a road trip to Louisville, Kentucky for a convention and on the way had some of the worst coffee I've had in my life. Drinking that sludge made me thankful for Starbucks, Timothy's, Tim Horton's and Country Style here in T.O.

    I went into one shopping mall and found nothing on the map that showed any coffee shops. I asked information and the only place they knew about was Chicken-Fil-A (geddit? Filet?). Their coffee (if I can call it that) was brewed a wheelbarrow at a time and tasted like it. Horrible.

    However, it is possible to get good coffee on the road -- the Pilot chain has decent coffee. Not great, but at least drinkable. And when I got to Louisville, The Galt House (where I stayed) had fantastic coffee in their restaurant. Not Starbucks good, but definitely good stuff.

    Oh, the local Starbucks? Nice place, but closed July 3, 4 and 5 for the Fourth of July. I guess it's an American thing to close for three days.

    Maybe Starbucks coffee is burnt -- I dunno -- but I do know that after I pack in my first taste of Breakfast Blend with some Half/Half and Whole Milk, the world is a better place. Yeah, it's close to double the cost of the cheapie coffee places, but the flavour's worth it.

  128. Unemployment Status by Czmyt · · Score: 1

    Maybe if he spent a little more time looking for work and less time driving around drinking coffee, he'd have a job!

  129. He could make his life easier.... by CommandoB · · Score: 1

    You know, as the number of _non_ Starbucks coffee shops dwindles monotonically to zero, maybe he could make his quest feasible by just visiting those shops instead.

    --
    Not that I post on slashdot or anything.
  130. Human pheromones are an urban myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh... People, there is no such this as human pheromones. All the scientific research to this point has proved that fact. I know it's comforting for some to believe otherwise, but the idea of human pheromones are merely an urban myth. Can we get over it now?

    Just in case it didn't get though: no human pheromones. BTW, pheromones in animals don't smell like anything, they're odourless. What you're talking about is BO (body odour). Oooh, now that's sexy. Pathetic. rolleyes

  131. Coffeeresearch.org by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    Those numbers are ancient! 1985 to 1988? Let's see some numbers from the late '90s.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  132. 4000+ so far by conan+the+librarian · · Score: 2, Funny

    So he just got out of Seattle?

  133. NYC by bluethundr · · Score: 1

    His personal quest is to visit every company-owned Starbucks and he's not doing too badly. After 7 years he's hit over 4,000 locations in the United States and 167 in Britain and Japan.

    Taking on Manhattan alone in this challenge is simply too mind numbing for me to conceptualize. It seems like all the dope dens that open in NYC on a weekly basis can't even REMOTELY compete with Starbucks.

    Why, at Astor Place alone one can almost LITERALLY stand in front of one starbucks, and shout across the square and above the din of the traffic to your friend at the OTHER STARBUCKS can will you!

    Slightly hyperbolous. But ONLY by a might!

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
  134. Kona and Jamaica Blue Mountain! by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    Kona is great stuff. I can't afford the pure stuff most of the time, but I found a nice blend.

    My all-time favorite coffee is Jamaican Blue Mountain. Wow! I've paid $25 for a 1/2 lb of beans a few times in the past, and it's worth it. That is the stuff that I will not serve for guests, I horde it for me on Sunday mornings. A local shop near me used to carry a Blue Mountain Blend that was almost as good for $18.95 a pound, but they didn't sell very much and quit bringing it in.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
    1. Re:Kona and Jamaica Blue Mountain! by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've occasionally seen the blends. But the amount of pure Blue Mountain in there is usually quite low. I've seen some Kona blends (in Hilo & Kona) that list the percentage of pure Kona, and it is usually something like 5-10%. Who knows what the other 90% is.

    2. Re:Kona and Jamaica Blue Mountain! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      If you want pure Kona, get Royal Kona. It's one of the few varietals that is good unblended; rich, smooth with a "winey" subtlty. Alas, it's expensive, so most of what you get is blended to keep the cost reasonable.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:Kona and Jamaica Blue Mountain! by sydsavage · · Score: 1
      Yep, Kona and Jamaican Blue Mountain are fine, expensive coffees, good for a special treat. But for day to day drinking, I find Sumatran to be my favorite. Since moving to Phoenix, I've settled for the Sumatran/Columbian that is Trader Joe's house blend. Good stuff, and it won't put you in the poor house. (Gotta love Trader Joe's!)

      The rare occasions when I have coffee outside of my house, I'll usually go for a latte or cappucino, with ice in the blast furnace the locals call summer.

    4. Re:Kona and Jamaica Blue Mountain! by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Sumatra Blue Lintong? That's what I was drinking before I subscribed to Gevalia. Good, rich, well-balanced and reasonably priced. If I couldn't get Gevalia, I'd go right back to it in a heart-beat.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Kona and Jamaica Blue Mountain! by sydsavage · · Score: 1

      The most specific labeling I've seen has been Sumatran Mandheling, of which (I believe) Blue Lintong is a subvariety. I don't know if I've been exposed to this particular subvariety, but from the description I ran across on The Coffee Review, it sounds exactly like the Sumatran blends I've had: earthy, mellow, full-bodied...

  135. Trust me. by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of people that crave consistent (dull) offerings. They're too scared to risk anything by trying something new.
    I see it all the time. They can't live without the familiarity of a Starbucks. They'll find problems with anything else. If you drag these people into a locally-owned shop, they're afraid. I find it quite funny.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
    1. Re:Trust me. by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      They probably also drink Miller and/or California White Zinfandel. People in this country need to relax a bit more and try new things...

  136. I thought about doing something similar.... by chuckgrosvenor · · Score: 1

    but with the local music store chain in Massachusetts called "Newbury Comics". They only have 25 stores scattered around southern New England. I've probably visited half of them without even trying. I buy a lot of CDs (yeah, I know the RIAA, boo-freakin-hoo) and they're all quite unique in their own way. I also thought about doing it with all the pizza places in the city next to the town I live in, but there's literally over 100 of them, and I don't think my colon needs that much cheese.

    This guy is pyscho though, and certainly has my respect. 4000+ stores is just incredible, and his collection of pictures might actually be useful someday for research of the corporate giant.

    Some people genuinely love large corporations products, I know it's hard for the Slashdot commies to appreciate. Ever notice the people who collect Coca-Cola products (perhaps the most overmarketed fructose laded garbarge ever)?

  137. Does he insult them all as well? by ross.w · · Score: 1

    Hey Starbucks Downtown New York!

    Your coffee sucks!

    (ticks entry in notepad, vanishes)

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  138. Different? by sulaco252 · · Score: 0

    How exactly is visiting Starbucks considered being different?

    --

    (There used to be something clever here.)

  139. Conspiracy? by Byzandula · · Score: 1

    I think bigbucks may be feeding this lads coffers a bit. Think about the marketing value that this guy brings. It is all a setup! I'm not a crook! My penis made me do it!

    "Think for yourself. Question authority"
    -tool

  140. Senseo + Douwe Egberts by harmonica · · Score: 1

    I like Philips Senseo in combination with Douwe Egberts coffee pads. A bit pricey, but I drink less of it and it tastes a lot better.

    The water is pumped through the pads at a high speed, therefore there are less bitter constituents in the resulting coffee. At least that's what someone told when I wondered why I have less stomach problems with that coffee. Nice side effect.

  141. Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy shit, are you some kind of fucking homo? Wait, I'll answer: "Yes."

  142. and in other news... by aqui10 · · Score: 1

    slashdot is part of the OSDN network which has recently aquired starbucks. Cowboy Neal feels its a perfect addup to the new hacker feel of the visiting community !

  143. Addiction by Randym · · Score: 1
    SB and WM only gives them the choice, they don't make it.

    Unless you note the fact that Starbuck's coffee has twice as much caffeine as other coffee shops. Then the question arises: are these customers actually making a free choice or are they being driven by their caffeine addiction to choose Starbucks so that they can get their daily maintenance dose?

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  144. Re:let me be the first to say.... by onepoint · · Score: 1

    >> what's the point

    Well, interestingly enough I went researching more about this problem :

    found this site
    http://www.tsp.gatech.edu/

    then I came up with an interesting idea that might turn into something usefull for someone out there.

    using some of the code for solving the problem, why not apply it for routers ( as another solution along with bgp ). Make the cost ping times. This might be interesting back up solution for a networks.

    this might be very interesting for office networks and small switch networks within communities.

    Onepoint

    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
  145. Worth the effort? by shrewtamer · · Score: 1

    Has he had a decent coffee yet?
    I can think of at least 3 cafes who roast better coffee than Starbucks in my area.
    Bloody uniformity....why would you want the same bloody cafe all over the world. Ugh. Lets just level the whole bloody place with a bulldozer so we don't get any surprises. All I want is a Big Mac, KFC to go and a Frapaccino. I'd rather have shit on a stick.
    Now maybe he is plotting the path of a really cool smart missile...yes that's a better way of thinking of it...Starbucks days are numbered! How long before he completes the trajectory.

  146. Re:How does one make a living? Two words... by sydsavage · · Score: 1
    Stealth. Marketing.

    That's my suspicion, anyhow. Now, if he were visiting and taking pictures of independent coffee houses across the land, his site would deserve a visit. But the McDonalds of coffee does not.

    Has anybody researched this for a connection back to HQ? It just reminds me a little too much of the Mini robot website, that slashdotters quickly debunked by tracing the website ownership back to a ad agency used by BMW/Mini.

  147. Boss? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    "I have to take a coffee break now.
    To Phoenix."

  148. What's a Starbucks? by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that something like a Tim Horton's?

    ??!?! :)

  149. Let's take that to its extreme then. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    If putting stores within 2-3 miles of each other always results in higher revenue, then it makes perfect sense to tile the entire planet with Starbucks stores 2 miles apart.

    It would also have the benefit that even in the middle of the Sahara desert you could walk on over to Starbucks and get a bad-tasting, but still coffee, coffee.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  150. As opposed to the losers.... by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

    ...who post 809 comments on some groupthink-ridden online forum like this guy .

  151. What a complete loser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a complete loser would do something like this.

  152. What a retard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject.

  153. Hahaha. Clueless. by lorcha · · Score: 1
    The non-smoker wants the average to be higher. They want to make smokers more nasty, evil, addicted and out of control than they really are.
    That is the most rediculous thing I've heard all day. Granted, it's only 11am, but seriously. As a non-smoker, the only thing I wish I could make smokers do is stop smelling like ass. You seriously fucking reek. Your breath reeks, your clothes reek, your ashtray reeks, and I'd rather not be around you because you stink. You stink up bars and make my clothes stink, too. You make my contacts itch. You make everything around you stink and everyone around you suffer. I'm just happy you can't smoke indoors so I don't have to smell that, too.

    Your attempt to portray non-smokers as being unreasonable because we object to your addiction is just silly. Seriously, your addiction? Not my problem. Your health-risks? Not my problem. I don't care if you get lung cancer and die. I don't care if you get throat cancer and die. I don't care if you get heart disease and die. If you smelled ok, I wouldn't care if you smoked. But you reek, so I find you offensive.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  154. Heh by lorcha · · Score: 1

    Making a small or large is no extra work. Starbucks employees prolly just look irritated because.. well.. they're working at Starbucks. Can you blame them?

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  155. Re:Hahaha. Clueless. by jred · · Score: 1

    Strangely enough, some people don't even need to smoke or reek to be offensive.

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  156. Re:Hahaha. Clueless. by lorcha · · Score: 1
    Cute. But is it really so bad of me to dislike having to smell nasty smells? I mean, I don't fart in public because people around me don't like the smell. So why should smoking in public be socially acceptable?

    So when someone comes along and accuses nonsmokers of thinking him a pariah for being addicted to tobacco, I responded that I, a nonsmoker, couldn't care less about his stupid addiction. It's the smell that bothers me. Is a little fresh air so much to ask for?

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  157. Re:Hahaha. Clueless. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    You demonstrate my point. You dislike smokers. They annoy you. Right or wrong, you think of them as filthy nasty people.

    p.s. I quit smoking. I no longer smoke. But I hope I still offend you.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!