Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars DVD Set Previews/Reviews

Reducer2001 writes "USA Today has an article up that has a couple more details about the upcoming Star Wars DVD release. The cantina shootout between Han Solo and the green-snouted bounty hunter Greedo is virtually identical, but now it seems their guns fire almost simultaneously." Reader Jutebox150 writes "Time magazine has an early preview of the Star Wars DVDs and gives some justification for Lucas issuing the updated versions of the trilogy and talking about his many mental and physical battles to finish filming. The article also describes a 2.5 hour documentary by Kevin Burns that traces the origins of the saga. 'The first cut of Star Wars,' Burns' narrator says, 'was an unmitigated disaster.'" Reader spoco2 writes "The Star Wars Original Trilogy is due for worldwide release on the 21st on DVD, but the first reviews are appearing already in Australia (obviously of the PAL version). Yes, they are the SEs with even more differences (Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!). I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals."

465 comments

  1. Uh-oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh shit. Time for a thread triage. Everyone complaining about how Star Wars is terrible and your childhood is ruined, reply here. People discussing Lucas and his never-ending quest to rape the franchise for more money, over on the left. If your contribution to the discussion is "HAN SOLO SHOT FIRST!", over on the right. GNAA... well, you know what to do.

    1. Re:Uh-oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shit. Time for a thread triage. Everyone complaining about how Star Wars is terrible and your childhood is ruined, reply here. People discussing Lucas and his never-ending quest to rape the franchise for more money, over on the left. If your contribution to the discussion is "HAN SOLO SHOT FIRST!", over on the right. GNAA... well, you know what to do.

      This should be modded up --- it needs to be said. It is only a fucking movie people. Get over it.

    2. Re:Uh-oh! by bonkedproducer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It is only a fucking movie people. Get over it."

      Exactly - it's only a movie that redefined special effects, and by lucas choosing to bar the future generations of artisans who do this sort of thing from seeing their roots would be like the Charlie Chaplin being able to prevent future film makers from being able to learn anything from his work.

      It's a slap in the face of everyone who worked on a movie that was revolutionary for it's time to have Lucas, who was only one of hundreds of people involved in the creation of the film(s) legacy to claim "They're work was shit so I will do all in my power to make sure future generations cannot lay eyes upon it" - release both you swollen headed egomaniac.

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    3. Re:Uh-oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " They're work was shit so I will do all in my power to make sure future generations cannot lay eyes upon it"
      Uh, "They are work was shit"?
    4. Re:Uh-oh! by bonkedproducer · · Score: 1

      It's called a typo cocktard!

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    5. Re:Uh-oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, I know how many times I've reached for "i" and hit "y'"...

      It's not a typo unless you missed a key - otherwise, it's what we nitpickers like to call a spelling error.

  2. Holding your breath... by jeffy210 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals."

    Riiight, you do that... can you also let me know when Duke Nukem Forever comes out?

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
    1. Re:Holding your breath... by mzkhadir · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Duke Nukem will come out when Hell Freezes Over or close when Arnold becomes President.

    2. Re:Holding your breath... by hpulley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dust off your VCR! I still have my original tapes, complete with grey bounding boxes on the models, etc. They still work. No need to wait for DVD really if you want to see the 'originals'. Sure, it isn't widescreen but at least the story is the same (one can argue that changing the shooting order is fairly significant for Han's character) and no new actors have been added!!!

      --
      $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
    3. Re:Holding your breath... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny
      can you also let me know when Duke Nukem Forever comes out

      Duke Nukem Forever is set to be released in a box set with the original unfscked with Star Wars trilogy, along with Rick Berman's three hour apology speech for what he has done to Star Trek. Unfortunately its release will happen on the exact same day that the Pentagon announces that it now considers the world "safe" and will be disbanding itself accordingly. Due to the lack of press over the release, all three features will tank. Luckily for the studios, however, no one will notice due to the overwhelming victory of the combined Bigoot and Antlantis forces over a disbelieving US. Or something like that...

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:Holding your breath... by psmurf · · Score: 1

      I think we've all missed the point. I think Lucas is playing a little game .. it's called withhold what people REALLY want, so that you can keep selling them what they ALMOST want. This is the reason that star wars was not even out on dvd until now. This is the reason that episodes 1-3 are spaced so far apart... Get the fans really antsy for the next offering. It's a game of carrots and sticks ... and the only real point is to fatten lucasfilms wallet. Lucas seemed to substitute artistic ambitions for financial ones long ago.

    5. Re:Holding your breath... by Asprin · · Score: 1


      I'm not holding my breath, but it's possible. When Spielberg released "CE3K - The Collector's Edition" on DVD a few years back, he kept a few scenes from the special edition, but restored the original ending and a number of shortened and eliminated scenes to bring the movie real close to the original theatrical release -- something he swore he'd never do.

      What sucks is even though it's *my* childhood, *he* owns it so he can do whatever he wants. I'm pretty sure there's a lesson about consumerism in there somewhere - I'll look for it when I'm done catching up on my "Charles In Charge" and "Three's Company" box sets. ;)

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    6. Re:Holding your breath... by MikeMacK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I still have the originals on laserdisc (widescreen) and my laserdisc player still works - so some of us can keep the dream alive.

    7. Re:Holding your breath... by Nishal · · Score: 0

      The updated editions are luca's vision.Bitch all we want about it, he will still release what he wants..Guy already has enough money...he is not worried about what we think re: jar jar binks

    8. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good point since he seems to be doing that with the new Indiana Jones film, too. I am more scared of what that will turn out like then what these DVD's or Episode 3 will be. I was a much bigger fan of the Indy films.

    9. Re:Holding your breath... by j_sp_r · · Score: 1

      They are on supernova, the LD rips, in DVD format for your pleasure!!

    10. Re:Holding your breath... by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative
      and my laserdisc player still works
      Before it stops working, consider getting a high quality video capture card, and mastering them onto a DVD-R.

      Then, under no circumstances, flog copies on ebay under an everchanging pseudonym :)

      OK. The first paragraph is good advice.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    11. Re:Holding your breath... by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      I still have the originals on laserdisc (widescreen) and my laserdisc player still works - so some of us can keep the dream alive.

      Take a look on suprnova.org. There are actual torrents of Laserdisc to DVD conversions on there for fans of the original.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    12. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disbanding the Pentagon in such a way is probably a catch 22. The world will never be safe while the Pentagon exists, thus they will never disband themselves.

    13. Re:Holding your breath... by minotaurcomputing · · Score: 1

      " I think we've all missed the point. I think Lucas is playing a little game .."

      It's called making money. Jebus it's not like the guy is keeping food from starving people; it's just Star Wars. He is selling a commodity that for whatever whacky reason people have decided is worth shelling out absurd amounts of money for, given seemingly minor changes from one iteration to the next. If you're pissed off about it, then stop buying the different versions and perhaps he will finally sell something worthwhile when he discovers that his tricks no longer work. I realize that it's difficult to live knowing that there is a new special effect added that might add a slightly different angle to the Star Wars lore, so go ahead and spend your money on it. Maybe the next version will have a scene where Chewbacca says "RRRRAAAALLLLWWWW" instead of "RRRAAALLLLLGGG".

      I've had my say. (as I sit back and wait for the flames about how Chewbacca would never say "RRRAAALLLLLGGG" because his dialect of Wookiese doesn't have such a term)

      -m

    14. Re:Holding your breath... by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      I have thought about doing this for most of my laserdisc collection - it is quite large, but haven't gotten around to it. I know my wife would be very happy to have my boxes of "albums" in a smaller format.

    15. Re:Holding your breath... by abischof · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      For better or for worse, only natural-born citizens of the US may become president (which would preclude Arnold).

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    16. Re:Holding your breath... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But in Demolition Man, there's a presidential library or something named after him with the explanation that due to popular demand the repealed that part of the constitution.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    17. Re:Holding your breath... by tuffy · · Score: 1

      Spielberg has been good about releasing the original versions of his movies. He might digitally erase a snake reflection or tweak some background goofs nobody cares about, but he won't do wholesale changes to the films people remember. Lucas has a long history of not only changing the movies he's directed, but never going back and releasing the originals. Star Wars isn't the first, but it'll only be the last once he stops directing altogether.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    18. Re:Holding your breath... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently you haven't seen "Demolition Man," where it's predicted that the law will get changed to let Arnold run for president...because he had done such a good job with being governor of California.

    19. Re:Holding your breath... by cmpalmer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, the problem with this whole discussion is that if Lucas *did* decide to release the "original" versions, we would still expect him to cleanup the matte lines, fix the light sabre glows, digitally clean-up the prints, tweak the soundtracks, etc., so they wouldn't really be the "original" versions.

      Of course, replacing actors with their prequel equivalents, making Han shoot first, changing bad songs to even worse ones (ROTJ), and adding more burping and farting creatures goes a bit beyond cleanup and director's cut land.

      To some extent, the only reason to release the really original release (which would still need a great deal of digital restoration as the film stock has aged) would be as an illustration of film history. All of those ground-breaking, breathtaking special effects that look a bit cheesy now will be lost. In 20 years, it will be nearly impossible to go back and see what state of the art effects were in 1977, or what Tatooine looked like when the cinematography was based on what cameras, filters, and lenses were used instead of what digital post-processing can do.

      These are the reasons I want *both* versions. I don't really want to watch the originals for entertainment and be distracted by David Prowse's eyes in the Vader mask, the bounding boxes and matte lines, or Vader's sometime's white lightsabre. I would like to have them to show my kids what I watched in 1977 and as nostalgia.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    20. Re:Holding your breath... by mzkhadir · · Score: 1

      I was hearing rumor they might be changing that for Arnold and Obama.

    21. Re:Holding your breath... by andyt · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've had my say. (as I sit back and wait for the flames about how Chewbacca would never say "RRRAAALLLLLGGG" because his dialect of Wookiese doesn't have such a term)

      Wookiese? Chewbacca, as a native Kashyyykian, speaks Shyriiwook you insensitive clod!

    22. Re:Holding your breath... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Funny

      along with Rick Berman's three hour apology speech for what he has done to Star Trek

      Only 3 hours? He must talk really, really fast if he's going to fit it all into 3 hours...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    23. Re:Holding your breath... by Schnapple · · Score: 4, Informative
      There are actual torrents of Laserdisc to DVD conversions on there for fans of the original
      At the risk of the storm troopers kicking in my door, I have these. They're real, and they're fantastic. They're ~4.7GB images, so the video quality for 2+ hour movies is not as good as it could be (the bit budget on a 2-layer DVD-R would provide for more) but they're really pretty good, all things considered. They even have Dolby Digial 2.0 surround and - get this - the audio commentaries from the definitive collection, complete with on-screen text. The menus even have easter eggs and production notes, along with the definitive collection logos. Make no mistake - whoever made these did it as a labor of love.

      There's also a fourth disc of extras (not sure if it's on suprnova) that comprises most of the extras from the definitive collection, such as documentaries, old trailers, etc. It's geek ecstasy and it's an interesting look back at Lucas when he was seemingly quite content with his creations.

      A website I won't link to out of courtesy (slashdotting) has images you can download and print out that look like and work like DVD covers. They have covers that look like the style of the currently released DVD's and covers that have the original movie posters. I opted gor the movie poster ones. Printed out on a color laser printer, the untrained eye can't tell a difference between them and the episode 1 and 2 DVD cover spines on a shelf (save for the reflective gold ink on the official ones).

      Now I must say, after getting these, watching them, etc., I'm content with the DVD's coming out later this month. Sure, I would still like official releases of the theatrical cuts, but these work for me. Heck, since for some reason they've decided to make the spines of the official widescreen releases silver I won't even have "duplicates" on my shelf.

      So to recap, get these laserdisc --> DVD-R rips. They're worth however many days it takes to download them. Find a DVD burner somewhere, somehow. Buy the officials (like I am). Be happy that you have both.

    24. Re:Holding your breath... by Hellburner · · Score: 1

      Obama was born in Kansas.
      Technically...part of the U.S.

    25. Re:Holding your breath... by Hellburner · · Score: 1

      Sorry... Hawaii.
      But again...still native-born.

    26. Re:Holding your breath... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      Well... i went out and bought a laserdisc player and a SW:ANH laserdisc off ebay, once I heard that the DVD's were going to be Special Edition vintatge...

      We had a showing and then popped in a VHS of the special edition and cued it up to the "greedo shooting first" scene. It is horrid, but I had to admit that the colors of the special edition were much more vibrant and modern (which I liked).

      The laser disc looked very pale and 70's style. (yes I know it's a 70's film, but in comparison to the cleaned up version it looked "clear" but "bad")

      There were several different versions of ANH on laserdisc of varying qualities (including a laserdisc of the garbage special edition, yuck!). I wonder if the "definitive collection" laserdisc or the other late 80's early 90's reprint was done cleaner than the early 80's one I have. (any LD geeks know which edition is the best print? please advise)

      There's always the Phantom Edit approach =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    27. Re:Holding your breath... by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      You know, the problem with this whole discussion is that if Lucas *did* decide to release the "original" versions, we would still expect him to cleanup the matte lines, fix the light sabre glows, digitally clean-up the prints, tweak the soundtracks, etc., so they wouldn't really be the "original" versions.

      I'm not to sure that would be the case. People with access to the widescreen Lasderdisc version of the trilogy seem pretty happy with it.

    28. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! Get some people to download the torrents and start them up, and speed up my downloads!

    29. Re:Holding your breath... by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I still have the originals on laserdisc (widescreen) and my laserdisc player still works - so some of us can keep the dream alive.

      An elegant format for a more civilized time.

    30. Re:Holding your breath... by TheGatekeeper · · Score: 1

      And me without mod points...

      --
      'The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than a prop for age,' -Hamá, the doorward
    31. Re:Holding your breath... by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      It's funny though - when we have people over and we all decide to watch a movie and we decide on one that I have on laserdisc, the looks on some people's faces when they see how large they are is hilarious. "What is that, a big DVD?" Sorta. And I have to agree on the more elegant format - granted they're big, but I've never had any trouble watching one - I even have one with a large crack running through it and it still plays fine. If I rent a DVD and it has even the slightest, tiniest, smallest, infintesimal scratch on it, it will skip and freeze. I've given up renting them since they almost never work unless I get it when it first comes out. I rent more VCR tapes now - not exactly a step forward. Too bad no one rents laserdiscs anymore. :-)

    32. Re:Holding your breath... by jasonmicron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You don't repeal anything on the Constitution. You make another amendment that supercedes the original amendment.

      Now someone hurry up and rate this Offtopic!

    33. Re:Holding your breath... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Holy SHIT! These things actually have menus, alternate sound channels, etc.? I was reluctant on getting these because they were unofficial and was only expecting a single linear movie with no menus and extras, but I see it's not the case. Hopefully they're widescreen- I don't need to ask. A partial download with a quick view of the VOB segment ought to clear that up.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    34. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have both the orginal laserdisc and the definitive collection. The picture quailty on the definitive collection is much better. Get it if you can find it. I got it on sale for $200 back in 1994 I think.

    35. Re:Holding your breath... by Schnapple · · Score: 4, Informative
      They're widescreen, but non-anamorphic. Or at least mine were. Word is there's a set floating around that is anamorphic but but the video quality is actually worse. The video quality on these is pretty damn good - you'll definitely know you're watching an unofficial DVD, but it's scores better than VHS, more durable, and has the extras of the laserdiscs.

      Note that the commentary track is not screen-specific (i.e., it's not Lucas & crew sitting around watching the movie). I believe this hails from back when Laserdisc commentaries were rare and so few people did that. What it is is a bunch of audio clips from interviews, documentaries, etc. It's done such that the thing you're hearing has to do with what you're seeing but it's not like the people were sitting there and commenting in real time. The upcoming DVD's, I believe, will have a commentary like this.

      Also note that there's an obsessive 67-page thread on the OT.com forums on it dissecting all the various versions (many will sell you DVD's with the OT on them) and people discussing making their own DVD's from laserdisc. Apparently there's some short scenes that go missing now and again from all the various reissues. And now that dual-layer DVD burners are coming into vogue there's people discussing making higher quality anamorphic discs.

    36. Re:Holding your breath... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the laserdisc .torrents include the cover art.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    37. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If I rent a DVD and it has even the slightest, tiniest, smallest, infintesimal scratch on it, it will skip and freeze

      Sounds like you need a new DVD player. I'm serious. I had an old DVD player that I bought for like $300.00 years ago and it was the same way as yours, small scratches would screw it up, etc. I recently spent about $100.00 on a new DVD player and it plays all of my old unplayable scratched DVD's just fine.

    38. Re:Holding your breath... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. He's lost me permanently as a fan: I haven't seen Ep. 2 and won't see Ep. 3, and the only copies of the movies I've got are the laserdisc rips and the Phantom Edit.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    39. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but a "cleaned-up" version of the old one would be better than the politically correct (Han SHOT FIRST!!!), dance-track, dj-hosted ewok celebration, BAAADDDD CGI-Jabba version we had to suffer through last time *vomits*.

      I understand wanting to get rid of the boundary boxes, sometimes-white lightsabre, and David Prowess' eyes behind the not-so-dark lenses of the Vader helmet, but to me, that's not destroying the basic, fundamental art that is the original movies. That's just using the technoogy we have today to make it "look" more real, more "believeable", thus making the viewing experience more enjoyable.

      But to change the story line, add (as opposed to simply re-mastering) new soundtracks (GOD I hate that stupid new celebration song at the end of ROTJ hell, why didn't they just get Brittany Spears to come out and lead the ewoks in a dance routine while they were at it!), and new scenes with characters that we all KNOW looked better as huge latex puppets than they do as POORLY done CGI characters. I think it sucks, and I think Lucas sucks for being such a jerk.

    40. Re:Holding your breath... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I would bet that the anamorphic version is a third generation of reencoding derived from the LD rip that you on suprnova.org. Bad encoder, bad [swats nose with newspaper]. It shouldn't bother me too much for now that these are of 4:3-with-black-bar variety. The DVDs of older Jackie Chan movies seem to be mostly non-anamorphic as well, and look great on a standard definition set, despite the lower res image and crappier Chinese film stock it was derived from.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    41. Re:Holding your breath... by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm thinking too. So, is the cheapest the way to go, or any suggestions on make/model that works well at playing scratched DVDs?

    42. Re:Holding your breath... by UserGoogol · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Po-tay-to, Po-tah-to.

      Now someone hurry up and rate this Insightful!

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    43. Re:Holding your breath... by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
      I have only seen the first disk, which looked good, but someone I know who has watched all three Star Wars disks from the bittorrent says they've been modified - two people apparently inserted text of their names into a number of scenes in episodes 5 and 6. There were other discrepencies, too.

      The person in question has original original Betamax tapes of all three movies, given to him by an uncle who worked on the production. So he has some basis for comparison...

    44. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong Democrate. They are thinking about changing the law for the current Gov. of Michigan who was born in Canada.

    45. Re:Holding your breath... by kill+-9+$$ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got the originals for the VCR in widescreen format. Na-ne-na-ne-na-na.

      That being said, I really wanted to get them on DVD, but sadly I won't get my wish this time around it seems. So I implore slashdot reader's and geeks everywhere to do the only thing you can do if you are truely passionate about this... Vote with your dollar. You don't need to purchase the new movies, you don't need to watch them, you don't need to see episode 3, etc. If enough people don't buy (which isn't going to happen) it would make a noticeable impact.

      Personally, I do feel strongly enough to not buy the DVD trilogy, and will plead with family not to buy it for me. Extreme? Perhaps, but since the whole damn thing is pretty much f'd at this point I don't really care any more.

      Maybe once the 3rd, 7th, 8th, and 9th movies come out he'll put out a 100-disc box set containing DVD's for every possible configuration/version of the series you'd ever want to see, and extra gazillion hours of extra footage of how hard it was to make this shot, or that shot, and a special 4 hour disc which just pays homage to how great Lucas is....

      --

      -- A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard
    46. Re:Holding your breath... by neurojab · · Score: 1

      >To some extent, the only reason to release the really original release (which would still need a great deal of digital restoration as the film stock has aged) would be as an illustration of film history.

      The reason I want the originals is not because of history. The originals were better films, period. They were less redundant, had better character development and better pacing. The effects, though cheesy by today's standards, were at least consistent.

    47. Re:Holding your breath... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      The laser disk version was good in this respect.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    48. Re:Holding your breath... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You forgot to work in the heat death of the universe and RMS shaving/bathing.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    49. Re:Holding your breath... by Wayfare · · Score: 1

      APEX DVD players are (according to my movie-buff friends) supposedly the best DVD player out there as far as playing anything you put in it. It may not be the best quality player, but it won't spit much back out at you.

    50. Re:Holding your breath... by Quikah · · Score: 1

      The definitive collection looks very good. You should be cautious however if you decide to purchase this set as it has some flaws in early pressing (several seconds of missing footage) and has a tendency to rot.

      A good alternative are the THX "faces" disks. it uses the exact same print that the definitive collection uses. I haven't heard of any widespread rot problems with these. These are CLV discs so in theory the picture will be slightly worse than the definitive collection discs. Also not many extras, just an interview at the end of each film.

      --
      Q.
    51. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the +5 funny for this? Come on people!

    52. Re:Holding your breath... by taernim · · Score: 1

      All that work describing how great they are, yet you don't provide a link to the torrent? ...

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    53. Re:Holding your breath... by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      That is left as an exercise for the reader...

    54. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that work describing how great they are, yet you don't provide a link to the torrent? ...

      The parent poster did, you just missed it. Geez, some people...

    55. Re:Holding your breath... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      They are fantastic, but I've noticed that the quality drops during some of the movies. Seems that laserdisc has two methods of encoding, and the longer movies of the trilogy use the 'low-quality longer-time' method on the second side of the disc.

      I believe Empire Strikes Back suffers from this pretty badly, but to be fair its not too easy to notice as LD quality isn't that high to begin with. Its definitely "good enough" to make me not want to buy the "new and improved" DVDs.

      Honestly, I wouldnt have bought them anyway. Its hard enjoying what are essentially kid movies from when I was a kid. I would be much more interested in catching one of these movies at a midnight showing in a theater with a rowdy crowd than owning them on DVD. And Lucas makes it hard for me to get interested in his work again. Man, imagine an aging Picasso re-doing his classic realistic work into cubism because fame and fortune would let him.

      Somewhere there's a Hollywood exec saying, "See what happens when we let artists own their own work?"

    56. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure... voting with your dollar is a smart move...

      Fox Home Video Exec: "Well, we didn't move many copies of that 'Star Wars' thing. Guess there isn't any market interest in that title."

      And then the originals will never be released...

    57. Re:Holding your breath... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I just noticed that you added me as a friend; can I ask why? :) Just curious.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    58. Re:Holding your breath... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Maybe we all want to be editors, but I have some suggestions for George. Release the originals with some cleaned up effects and sound.

      Now, I know it's his gig and he can do what he likes, but these are about the worst example of a "special edition/directors cut" I've ever seen.

      Is Lucas both director of these changes and in charge of overall product delivery? Often, having someone acting as a control device (like a producer working out getting rid of chaff), improves the work. I imagine that the studio are just happy for Lucas to release them. As long as he doesn't do something like have the dialogue changed to be spoken in Latin, the studio don't really care - they know enough people will buy it.

      The extra bits are to me, just chaff. The pointless vistas, the han meets jabba. They don't enhance the story or the characters or even make it a more beautiful or spectacular film.

    59. Re:Holding your breath... by davidbix · · Score: 2, Informative

      VideoHelp.com has a Star Wars Laserdisc capping thread at http://www.videohelp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=102 812&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

    60. Re:Holding your breath... by Bushcat · · Score: 1
      ...and my laserdisc player still works

      Well, getting here too late as usual, but laserdisc players are still being made. Check out the Pioneer Elite DVL-91 (which ain't cheap, but at least it exists).

    61. Re:Holding your breath... by abischof · · Score: 1

      Matt, I was amused by your "no cookie" comment about George Lucas :). I have my prefs set to automatically add +1 to friends and this way I'll be able to more easily notice your posts in the future.

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    62. Re:Holding your breath... by cfuse · · Score: 1
      ... along with Rick Berman's three hour apology speech for what he has done to Star Trek.

      I would be happy with 30 minutes of him raping himself with a pinecone.

    63. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a fantastic visual to start a off an otherwise cloudy Friday morn. *SIGH*

    64. Re:Holding your breath... by mink · · Score: 1

      I have the THX discs, but it would appear that in these while I enjoy the clean up of the boxes around ship models, Lucas started adding CGI I think.
      I say this because I dont remember some droids that are badly added to the start of the Mos Eisley scene (in the THX LD they are bright orange and stick out).
      I could also be mis remembering the original but I dont think so.
      Can anyone who has the original version and the THX one compare and let me know if I'm just insane?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    65. Re:Holding your breath... by mink · · Score: 1

      To bad they stopped making the HLD-X9 the only player worth investing $$ into.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    66. Re:Holding your breath... by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this seem a little too much like the Records Dep't in 1984 who actively change the past records to alter things right out of existence? Kinda creepy trying to change past events to deny they ever existed! :(

    67. Re:Holding your breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone most MD5 or SHA1 hashes for all of the VOBs? I've downloaded all of the torrents, but there are numerous scenes where scenes break up and cause my DVD player to skip.

      I've tried playing the VOB files directly off my HDD, and the same scenes have the same problems, so I know it's not my burning process.

      I know BitTorrent is supposed to do verify the integrity of the chunks it downloads... but, well, I'd like to be able to verify it with other tools too.

    68. Re:Holding your breath... by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      What in the world is Dolby 2.0 and how does it differ from PCM stereo?

  3. its obvious by Bhull · · Score: 3, Interesting

    he's embarrased by the original trilogy. he should just get it over with and release the damn thing.

    1. Re:its obvious by Krandor3 · · Score: 1

      He is never going to release the original version of the original trilogy. Even after he dies, I bet he has a provision in his will that they can never be released.

    2. Re:its obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering all the Star Wars movies, there are a lot of things he should be embarrased by, however the original trilogy should not be his first concern.

    3. Re:its obvious by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      It'll happen eventually. Maybe not until the copyright expires, but it'll happen. George may immolate himself along with the original film stock, but there's enough digital information floating around that the original can be pieced together.

      I wonder if my VHS tapes will last that long.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    4. Re:its obvious by chromaphobic · · Score: 1

      That's assuming that the copyright EVER expires. If Disney has their way copyrights will continue to be lengthened and nothing will ever become public domain again.

      As it stands, I doubt anybody reading this right now will still be alive by the time Star Wars enters the public domain. 2097, I think?

  4. Thus far by Ossadagowah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't seen anything that makes me want to buy his updated releases. I think I'll buy the original movies on DVD at a science fiction convention.

    --
    anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
    1. Re:Thus far by eingram · · Score: 1

      I'll buy it!

      I already own 5 different copies* of the trilogy, what is one more? :(


      *Original Pre-THX Widescreen, THX Pan and Scan (this one gets watched the most), THX Widescreen, 1997 Special Edition Widescreen, Re-release of 1997 SE Widescreen :( :( :( :( :(

  5. Re:Oh shit.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I care.

  6. Virgins, Get your opinions started! by ajservo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Begun, this flame war has...

    1. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh please. The only advantage Star Wars geeks have over Star Trek geeks is that they (okay, we) can get laid. Chicks dig Star Wars too. Maybe not as much or on as visceral a level, but come on -- every girl has swooned over Han, Luke or Lando. Play your cards right, don't mention the names and species of each alien in Mos Eisley cantina, and you're in.

      May the force be with you.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by minotaurcomputing · · Score: 1

      "Maybe not as much or on as visceral a level"

      I don't think that Star Wars and visceral belong in the same breath. Isn't this the movie with the quote:

      The Force is what gives a Jedi his power. It's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds us and penetrates us. It binds the galaxy together.

      -m

    3. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 2, Funny
      That reminds me of a white elephant gift I got while I was still in the fraternity. It was, in all the Slanted Text glory, a "The Force is in My Pants" shirt.

      I wore it once... needless to say, that's one of those things you only tend to wear around the (frat) house. Or, I suppose, trying to hit on girls at a Star Wars convention.

    4. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1
      I agree, I know many 'older' women who saw Star Wars when it was first released and there all for it. They love Star Wars...

      And these are 'hip' women too... I find they like the LoTR trilogy also. Sure they'd never read the books but they love the cute characters. Aragorn, Legolas...

      That is what Star Trek lacks: hunks.

    5. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey, hold! Don't mod it Informative until you get laid as a result of the advice!

    6. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by dswensen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not true. Both my ex-girlfriend and my current girlfriend both loved Trek, Star Wars, LotR, even Babylon 5. My ex was a huge anime freak, too. And my new girlfriend introduced me to Firefly.

      No, they're not imaginary, but some days I wonder if they ought to be.

    7. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by getnate · · Score: 1

      You're deluding yourself.

    8. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by circusboy · · Score: 1

      now, now let's not be exclusionary,

      some of them probably swooned over leia as well...

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    9. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      The Force is what gives a Jedi his power. It's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds us and penetrates us. It binds the galaxy together.

      Try imagining a porn reading of the above line. Interesting.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    10. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1
      Play your cards right, don't mention the names and species of each alien in Mos Eisley cantina, and you're in.

      Damnit! That's the part I never realized. Aaaugh!!! It would have been good to get this advice TEN YEARS AGO!

    11. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by spare.dave · · Score: 1

      Which leads to the obvious question, how much do these women weigh?

    12. Re:Virgins, Get your opinions started! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, burn. So when do you graduate eighth grade?

  7. dupe?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this a dupe?

    nothign to see here.. move along

    (and one last most-common slashdot post)

    can you imagine the trilogy transcoded on a beowulf clus...

  8. Hans and Greedo will post at the same time! by ARRRLovin · · Score: 1

    OMG!

    That would be awesome if they figured out a way to put the widescreen version on normal DVD's and the "Full Frame" verison on black DVD's.

    *starts looking at new TV's* :)

    --
    -Randy
    1. Re:Hans and Greedo will post at the same time! by SkankhodBeeblebrox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hans, eh? Is that the special Danish Edition of Star Wars??

    2. Re:Hans and Greedo will post at the same time! by ARRRLovin · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL!

      "Chewy, bring her down right next to yonder windmill."

      Damn my typo!

      --
      -Randy
  9. Special special editions by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm afraid I'm going to wait a couple of years until George ends up releasing all six with even more changes. I hope they took the wussy scream that Luke lets out as he falls from Vader at Cloud City though.

    1. Re:Special special editions by menor · · Score: 1

      According to the review at http://www.thedigitalbits.com/, the scream is gone. Shame they could edit out Luke's general whininess, though.

    2. Re:Special special editions by menor · · Score: 1

      Gah! Make that *couldn't*!

    3. Re:Special special editions by remin8 · · Score: 1

      Luke must get it from his dad. Teen Anakin is probably worse though. I think its time to switch to the dark side... no whining there... just a**-kickin'!

      --

      "Initial success, or total failure!"
      remin8.com
    4. Re:Special special editions by iainl · · Score: 1

      Yep, the girly scream is gone. It only got there in the first place by accident - its always been there on the sound mix for the 70mm prints, which they used as the basis of the '97 release.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:Special special editions by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Love that sig:

      I sense much NT in you.
      NT leads to bluescreen,
      bluescreen leads to downtime,
      downtime leads to suffering. ... and suffering leads the Dark Side.

      sig.replace("Dark Side", "GPL")

      hehe

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  10. Formats by tuxter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is it available on blu ray, because DVD will be dead in ten years, and I don't want lose my 29 DVD starwars collection.

    1. Re:Formats by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Uh, both Blu-Ray and HD DVD devices will be backward compatible to original DVD.

      They might still need a separate laser, but like the separate laser that was required at one time to read CD-Rs, the difference will likely be unnoticed by the user.

    2. Re:Formats by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

      Which laser shoots first?

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  11. Re:Oh shit.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha, no you dont.

  12. same time! by shutyourface · · Score: 1

    (Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!) What are Star Wars nerds gonna bitch about now?!

    1. Re:same time! by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Han shot first.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:same time! by knowles420 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      What are Star Wars nerds gonna bitch about now?!

      let me just cover all the bases and say, "a striking array of irrelevant and minute details"

      --
      -knowles
    3. Re:same time! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      (Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!) What are Star Wars nerds gonna bitch about now?!

      Greedo shot first!?

      Screw this, I'm not giving him money for the Speical Dinosaur Editio of these films. He's gone crazy but his marketing department is as agressive as ever...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:same time! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course he did, unless you believe that "Magic Blaster" theory Oliver Stone was touting...

      (Han shooting first was what made his character. Having him shoot at the same time reduces the effectiveness of his story and makes his change from self righteous smuggler to selfless statesman less impressive)

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:same time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you can still bitch about Greedo missing by about 2 feet. I think 3PO could have hit Han from where Greedo was sitting and Greedo works as a bounty hunter for the biggest gangster in the galaxy?

  13. .torrents of the Pre SE LD Editions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're very nicely done with good video quality. But expect for your ISP to receive an MPAA robolawyer DMCA takedown notice if you're using a US IP address. Now where did I put that open SOCKS proxy list... (Ask me how I know...)

    1. Re:.torrents of the Pre SE LD Editions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're not as l33t as you think, skript kiddie

  14. X-mas Special by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Holiday Special is said to have been altered too. In the new edition, Jefferson Starship shoots first.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:X-mas Special by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Isn't Dorf in the new version of the holiday special? I think the sketch is called "Dorf on Vader". Harvey Korman sure looks funny with those black boots on his knees.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:X-mas Special by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean Tim Conway. Geez, my age is showing isn't it?

    3. Re:X-mas Special by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean Tim Conway.

      He doesn't, and don't call him Shirley.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  15. Shooting by Mateito · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!

    How tantric.. err..

    So now we have Star Wars, Episode IV, designed by a committee edition. I may yet end up with the box set (we have a house full of furniture and need smaller things to put on our wedding "wannas" list.. yeah.. I hate the concept too, but practicality is winning on this one).

    1. Re:Shooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am NOT a committee!

      - George Lucas

    2. Re:Shooting by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      So now we have Star Wars, Episode IV, designed by a committee edition.

      All in favor of hot grits, say aye.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Shooting by Decaff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!

      Gredo must have been a very, very, very bad shot.

    4. Re:Shooting by Snowdog668 · · Score: 1

      Ouch, coffee through the nose. That's the funniest thing I've read all day.

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    5. Re:Shooting by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      The Expanded Universe has given the explanation that Greedo is a stupid loser who has no fucking idea how to be a bounty hunter.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    6. Re:Shooting by MouseR · · Score: 1

      The Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!) thing HAS GOT to be a bad joke.

    7. Re:Shooting by Decaff · · Score: 1

      The Expanded Universe has given the explanation that Greedo is a stupid loser who has no fucking idea how to be a bounty hunter.

      Which raises an interesting possibility - maybe Greedo accidentally shot himself.

    8. Re:Shooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, pray tell, is this "wedding" thing you speak of?

  16. Hans and Greedo now say "over" at the same time... by j1bb3rj4bb3r · · Score: 5, Funny

    as all guns are now replaced with walkie talkies.

    --
    *yawn*
  17. han/greedo by pyros · · Score: 4, Insightful

    well at least he seems to have made a partial concession on such a controversial edit. Show's he has at least one tiny spec of respect.

    1. Re:han/greedo by LnxRocks · · Score: 1
      Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!

      Han is known for his fast draw so this edit might actually (to the horror of all I know) be *more* in character than either of the previous attempts.

    2. Re:han/greedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course, lets not be so crazy as to put it back the way it was originally.

      -- gid

    3. Re:han/greedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fast draw? His gun was already drawn. That's why he starts playing with the wall with his left hand, to distract Greedo from his right hand getting the pistol.

      Han shot first, and that's perfectly in character for him.

    4. Re:han/greedo by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are confusing respect with pragmatism. Lucas is firmly convinced that his way is the right way. However, since a rerelease is about making money, he's trying to "preserve his vision" (how about preserving the fucking movie? is that not his vision?) while still making it more palatable to SW fans so he can sell it to them. It's not because he cares what you think on a personal level. He cares only on a financial level.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:han/greedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      frame by frame still show greenie shooting first. Han doesn't get his shot off until Greedo's splashes on the wall behind Han's head.

      Greedo's shot splashing near Han's head as Han shoots off...Tantric indeed

    6. Re:han/greedo by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Partial consession == lack of conviction. The fact that he edited this scene again, and into a third form, is the proof: Lucas is trolling. Have a nice day.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:han/greedo by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would have more respect for him if he didn't make that change. At least then is would show that he cares about the product, not the sales. Even if his prefered vision is different from everyone else on the planet, you've gotta stick to your ray guns).

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    8. Re:han/greedo by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Nonono. you see, han is noted for premature ejaculation, hence he shoots first. Greedo, on the other hand, being an alien, well, you see, um, er.

      Do you understand now?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    9. Re:han/greedo by Xcruciate · · Score: 1

      See the movie "Naked Lunch".

      --
      It's like "looking busy" at your employment - it's actually easier to do real work than to fake it. - bmo
  18. Orginal on VHS was a "one time offer"... by Mortimer82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought VHS cassettes of the original trilogy, and I remember a compaign to the effect of, this is the only time you will be able to get "The Original Star Wars" trilogy. (Altough I would have bought it anyway.)

    Then a while later we had big creen Special Editions, but of course this didn't contradict the previous offer, becuase it wasn't the "Original Star Wars Trilogy" even if it was only slightly different.

  19. Maybe a bit unwanted.... by Aceto3for5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Call me a purist, but I think the akward "Kiss Goodbye" between Jar Jar Binks and Chewbacca in the cantina is unappreciated at best.

    Also, I heard thanks to product placement, the death star now has the AT&T Logo slightly superimposed.

    1. Re:Maybe a bit unwanted.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the bottles of Michelob Ultra on the table.

    2. Re:Maybe a bit unwanted.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can you hear me now?"

      "IT'S A TRAP!"

    3. Re:Maybe a bit unwanted.... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      I came home the other day and there was a message on my answering machine from James Earl Jones. It was eerie -- he talked for like three minutes about how my DSL was now activated and who I should call if I had any trouble, but the poor digital quality of the answering machine meant he sounded just like Vader. I expected him to say some shit about "You don't know the power of the Broadband" or "Obi Wan never told you what happened to your cablemodem."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Maybe a bit unwanted.... by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

      Dude, same thing happened to me. It was pretty funny. Then I canceled my DSL, cause Verizon are a bunch of assholes.

      --
      That's right. All your base.
    5. Re:Maybe a bit unwanted.... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Apparantly, Dave Prowse (who was in the suit) was surprised they didn't ask him do the voice.

      Dave Prowse is from the west country of England and his voice isn't exactly powerful and dominating (try and find some sound samples of cornish speakers and you'll see what I mean ;) ).

      He was also known in the UK as the "Green Cross Code Man" helping children cross the road safely.

  20. and in the next version... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lucas, tired of people still complaining that Han shoots first, and not at the same time as Greedo, will tweak the scene so that, even though the shots look simultaneous, it will be possible to demonstrate that Han's shot fired milliseconds before Greedo's.

    However, I predict this will fail to silence the critics that still complain about Han stepping over Jabba's tail.

    1. Re:and in the next version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is basically what it was originally. . .

    2. Re:and in the next version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though I don't like the stepping on the tail thing. If you watch the special edition documentary you'll see that they had no choice in that scene

    3. Re:and in the next version... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      No choice?

      Sure there was a choice, they could have not added it at all. It's poorly acted (was just a dress rehersal), doesn't add to the movie, and in fact makes it stupid, just as bad as the Greedo thing.

      Why would a professional bounty hunter like Greedo miss from point blank range?

      Why would Jabba hire Greedo at all if he and his entourage are already there?

      Why would Jabba not kill Han the second he steps on his tail? I mean, he's supposed to be the most ruthless mob boss in the galaxy, you think he'd put up with an insult like that? (Go find a mob boss, and step on his toes, see what happens)

      Plus, the new scenes with the CG effects look out of place, and make the rest of the movie look stupid.

      Not that I get too worked up about it, it's just an overrated movie in the end.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:and in the next version... by julesh · · Score: 1

      Its been a while since I saw the scene in question, but if memory serves it annoyed me -- purely because I had assumed all along that Jabba was actually incapable of independent movement, and therefore the scene just didn't fit with his character for me.

    5. Re:and in the next version... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Asshole. You are never to mention that again. I've spent the last FIVE YEARS of my life in treatment and on medication over that scene.

      The doctors tell me I'm just remembering it wrong. I swear that when I was a kid, I saw a special on TV about star wars where they showed a big, fat, hairy man playing the role of Jabba the Hutt, and he spoke the dialog. None of this weird text stuff.

      But the doctors say it didn't really happen, that the scene really was "shot with a placeholder until we had the technology to make a big fat lizard like we'd intended to from the beginning."

      My advice? Don't see a doctor that's under 25 years old and practicing psychiatry.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    6. Re:and in the next version... by daeley · · Score: 1

      That's all right. I am still convinced I saw a scene in which Luke shows up in a bar in Anchorhead and talks to Biggs. A scene in the novelization, interestingly, but vehemently denied to have been able to happen. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    7. Re:and in the next version... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. The scene was really shot, and it really did appear on tv. It was just never in any edited release of the movie. (I remember seeing that scene and the original scene with jabba in a special about scenes that got cut)

      I have a vague memory of Chewbacca kicking the controls of the falcon away from him, and HBO running that scene in a lot of their commercials in the mid-80s about how cool they were for showing movies you want to watch.

      I have many ghosts of memories around scenes in the first two movies that may or may not be products of my imagination. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    8. Re:and in the next version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stills from that scene are on the bonus disc of the DVD set...

    9. Re:and in the next version... by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      Maybe he'll finally snap and make it so Greedo shoots first, and doesn't miss. Some rather heavy editing of the stuff that follows will be necessary but maybe he'll feel that will be worth it to show the complainers he's not one to be messed with.

    10. Re:and in the next version... by Xcruciate · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was actually shot and I have it on CD-ROM. It was some Star Wars game or Behind the Scenes thing, but, yes, it was filmed.

      --
      It's like "looking busy" at your employment - it's actually easier to do real work than to fake it. - bmo
    11. Re:and in the next version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i saw the new version 5 minutes ago

      they dont shoot at the same time.
      greedo sits right in front of han.
      then u hear a shot.
      then u see some laserlight right from han.
      then u hear another shot.
      now greedo gets grilled.

      the new version sucks.
      and lies like ur post are not funny.
      they DONT shoot at the same time.

  21. Shoot at the same time? by hode · · Score: 1

    Can some explain to me what all the commotion is about regarding the cantina shootout scene?

    1. Re:Shoot at the same time? by scoser · · Score: 1

      Han shooting first (in the original) makes him look like a total badass instead of some whiny bitch that is stupid enough to the chance that Greedo's aim sucks before he'll shoot back.

    2. Re:Shoot at the same time? by d41d8cd98f00b204e980 · · Score: 0
      Can some explain to me what all the commotion is about regarding the cantina shootout scene?

      Explanation.

    3. Re:Shoot at the same time? by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Can some explain to me what all the commotion is about regarding the cantina shootout scene?

      In the original that everyone around here grew up with, Han Solo guns down Greedo the bounty hunter because he's sneaky and cold-blooded when we first meet him. In the new versions, Han Solo shoots Greedo in self-defense and survives by sheer luck. In effect, Lucas changes the character to be more "warm and fuzzy".

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    4. Re:Shoot at the same time? by remin8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Basically, everyone grew up and had kids and decided that the shoot-first-and-ask-questions-later Han was too violent to show their kids. So now we have to endure a kinder-gentler space smuggler.

      --

      "Initial success, or total failure!"
      remin8.com
    5. Re:Shoot at the same time? by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Han Solo unsportingly blasted Greedo under the table. It makes Solo look like a cold-blooded killer.

      Lucas wanted it changed in the special edition to make it look like Han shot in self-defense only after being shot at first. The scene looks like crap. Fans universally hate it.

      Top 10 Other Things that Han Shot that Didn't Shoot at Him First

      http://www.fecundity.com/pmagnus/greedo.html

      George Lucas thought the scene between Han Solo and Greedo in the cantina made Han cold blooded. Let's think about the original scene, shall we? Greedo the bounty hunter is holding Han at gunpoint and says in his gurgly argot that he is going to kill him. Han shoots Greedo through the table before Greedo can blow Han a new smuggling hatch. That's makes Han cool-- not cold.

      Now let's look at the new scene. Greedo is sitting with Han at gunpoint again, only this time Greedo states his intent to kill Han and then shoots the wall. Han quickly avenges the stucco and blows away Greedo. Boy does the new scene stink! Even a stormtrooper could have hit Han at that distance! Perhaps Greedo turned to a life of crime after flunking out of Stormtrooper Academy.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    6. Re:Shoot at the same time? by pyros · · Score: 2, Informative

      Han is viewed as a rogue outlaw. Kill or be killed. He was talking to an assassin who pretty much said "i'm about to kill you, han." So Han shot Greedo before Greedo could shoot Han. The edit having Greedo shout first (and miss from two feet) makes Han look more like Aragorn than a rogue outlaw.

    7. Re:Shoot at the same time? by JWW · · Score: 1

      Of course when I watch Star Wars with my son, he finds out anyway as his father shouts "Han shot first!!!" at the screen.

    8. Re:Shoot at the same time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Can some explain to me what all the commotion is about regarding the cantina shootout scene?

      After seeing the final cut, Gredo accused Han of camping.

    9. Re:Shoot at the same time? by cmpalmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, someone has to do it...

      In the original release, Han is presented as a tough, ruthless mercenary. When confronted by Greedo in the cantina, he acts cool and unconcerned by the blaster Greedo has pointed at him, while, under the table, he is pulling his blaster out. After a pointed threat from Greedo, Han blows him away in cold blood. While Greedo is clearly threatening him, it seemed apparent at the time that Greedo wasn't going to kill him on the spot.

      In the new release, Lucas evidently decided, in his confused sense of morality (see David Brin and Orson Scott Card's analyses of the Star Wars series for more details), that Han shouldn't be a ruthless, cold-blooded killer, so he changed the scene slightly so that, after the pointed threat, Han ducks to the side, Greedo shoots wide, and Han shoots him in self-defense.

      In itself, it isn't that big of a deal, but many people (myself included) thought that part of Han's coolness was his handling of the situation and that changing it to self-defense was a major wimp-out that was symptomatic of Lucas' weird attempt at making the series more kid-friendly (or something -- the more you think about the ethics of the entire trilogy, the creepier it gets. See below). Similar to Spielberg's digital removal of guns in his ET re-release.

      The reason this is weird in contrast is that Lucas attempted to write the series as a textbook myth, literally following Campbell's Hero With a Thousand Faces pattern. What he ended up with was a series about a genocidal pyschopath who we should feel sympathy with because he was a cute kid; a supposedly revered mystical sect of warrier priests who believe that taking children from their parents and forbidding them to love or marry makes them better people; an incestuous love triangle; and a convoluted way of telling the story so that the climactic presentation of the series (Episode III) will have to resolve unbelievably divergent plot holes and involve the rise of an evil empire, the physical and psychological maiming of the main character, and the deaths and exile of most of the other main characters.

      Despite this, I'm not bitter :-)

      Actually, I am a bit bitter, but, like the obediant Star Wars fan and mindless consumer I am, I have already pre-order by DVD set...

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    10. Re:Shoot at the same time? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      In the original that everyone around here grew up with, Han Solo guns down Greedo the bounty hunter because he's sneaky and cold-blooded when we first meet him. In the new versions, Han Solo shoots Greedo in self-defense and survives by sheer luck. In effect, Lucas changes the character to be more "warm and fuzzy".

      This further reduces the impact of Han Solo not leaving Luke to fight the Death Star on his own later. You see, when han was a cold-blooded prick that shot first and didn't ask questions because he killed everyone he would've asked, his conversion to the rebel cause was a big deal. Now it's just...not...anymore.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    11. Re:Shoot at the same time? by shane_rimmer · · Score: 1

      The question is, what does he find out? The rolling eyes may be a clue.

  22. Other Changes... by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Han cries "Nice one kid, that was one in a million" BEFORE luke fires
    2. The wookie DOESNT win and C3P0 gets an unexpected "backdoor suprise"
    3. Han is now Luke's father (See change 1)
    4. The final scene in ROTJ has yoda wearing a ninja headband

    1. Re:Other Changes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      5. ???
      6. Lucas profits again.

    2. Re:Other Changes... by dave420 · · Score: 2, Funny

      5. The Death Star blows itself up before the rebels leave Yavin 4
      6. Princess Leia gives birth to Senator Amidala
      7. The stormtroopers are a nice shade of orange
      8. Darth Vader commits suicide in the first scene

    3. Re:Other Changes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      4. The final scene in ROTJ has yoda wearing a ninja headband

      ...and wearing Nikes.

    4. Re:Other Changes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      9. Princess Leia admits she has bi-polar disorder.
      10. Darth Vader informs Luke "I am your mother."
      11. Yoda takes off his mask and reveals he is the blue Muppet, "Grover".
      12. C-3PO and R2D2 marry each other.
      13. After finding out they are related, Leia and Luke "get it on".
      14. The prequels are edited to "not suck".

    5. Re:Other Changes... by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Funny

      9.Ben Konobi parties with Sand People, drinks too much and passes out in desert.
      10.R2-D2 enrages C-3P0's by bringing another robot into their "relationship"
      11.The part of Yoda will be played by Gary Coleman. "What you talkin' bout, Luke!"
      12.At the battle of Hoth, all the guns are removed and replaced with snow balls.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  23. More changes by JayBlalock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm not even going to bother bitching about the Anakin thing. There's no point. But, I have found this page, which purports to show most of the changes in the DVD. (although, oddly, it DOESN'T show the new Anakin)

    http://perso.club-internet.fr/willow/Index.html

    I wasn't sure how seriously to take it, but it seems to be corroborated by the article. (talking about having a better CG Jabba in ANH)

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
  24. That's it. by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny
    The cantina shootout between Han Solo and the green-snouted bounty hunter Greedo is virtually identical, but now it seems their guns fire almost simultaneously."
    Okay, that's it, I've had it.

    *rolls up a newspaper and goes to Skywalker Ranch, finds George Lucas, and smacks him over the head four times*

    NO! BAD GEORGE! GREEDO DOESN'T GET TO SHOOT *AT ALL*! BAD DIRECTOR! NO COOKIE!

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:That's it. by TaintedPastry · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      If only I had mod-points

  25. How many are there? by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

    I loved the original trilogy, and really have no major gripes abou the new ones, but how many re-releases are there? Seems like every other month slashdot has an article about a new release, what gives?

    1. Re:How many are there? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

      people complain because Lucas seems to have the Michael Jackson syndrome with the original SW trilogy.

      He can't stop altering it, to the point where it will soon all start falling apart.

      And both men live on so-called "ranches", so it gives one pause to wonder...

    2. Re:How many are there? by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the obvious similarity reference of "shooting first"...

      (Ewwwww)

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    3. Re:How many are there? by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need to start giving movies version numbers and include a change log?

    4. Re:How many are there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda like another rancher I know who seems to have a similar problem "re-touching" this particular story about a country far, far away, and whether or not it was directly involved in a certain attack on a major metropolis ("shooting first", if you will), whether or not it had weapons of mass destruction ("Death Star").

    5. Re:How many are there? by LardBrattish · · Score: 1

      Fortunately for George, goats don't hire attorneys & sue.

      Allegedly :)

      --
      What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
  26. Stream splitting by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing that was done on the Terminator 2 DVD was provide the original, plus the extended version with the deleted scenes. Both can be played all the way through as a movie even though the extended version is merely the original with deleted scenes spliced in, thanks to the wonders of random access media. My question is why Lucas hasn't taken advantage of that to allow certain scenes to be added/remove/changed to look like the original or enhanced version?

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:Stream splitting by menor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a couple of problems with using branching technology with the Star Wars Trilogy to have the original and the enhanced versions available on one disc.

      The biggest problem is that Uncle George considers his latest version to be the "definitive" edition of the Trilogy; he doesn't want to bring back the original at all. Hopefully, he'll eventually buckle (or, at least, realize he'd make a killing selling the originals as well as the current editions) and release them.

      The second problem is that there is so much enhancement to the movies, you'd basically have to include both versions (original and enhanced) on the DVD. There simply isn't room for all of that.

    2. Re:Stream splitting by gkelman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I've been asking the exact same thing. There's no excuse for it, that's like the _whole_ _point_ of DVDs, and the whole "other camera angles" thing. You could easily switch between original and broken versions.

    3. Re:Stream splitting by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Other than restoring the quality of the picture, I'm trying to think of what enhancements were made. Let's see, there's the Greedo shoots first scene, plastic Jabba the Hutt scene, Death Star w/shockwave scene, changed music in ending of RotJ..there's got to be more. Post a link if you got it. It's gotta all fit on one disc.

      Even if branching wouldn't work, there's always DVD-18 (Don't worry, DVD writer users, it's only double sided dual layer). I believe T2 used that kind, and Terminator 1 used DVD-14.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    4. Re:Stream splitting by Mateito · · Score: 1

      I really like the T2 extended version. It changes the mood of the movie from a pure chase/action flick, to a top sci-fi flick with a lot more character depth. There are a couple of unecessary scenes... like in the dog pen, and I still can't resolve Sarah's gloating over stabbing Dickwad in the knee with a pen with her claim, 2 scenes later, that "she's shown improvement".

      Even though Edward Furlong is unbelievable as some great "future leader", the gradual thawing of Sarah's... well.. bitchy personality, works a lot better in the long version.

    5. Re:Stream splitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly all the space scenes were redone, using CG instead of models; then there are things like all the extra aliens in Mos Eisely, etc. etc. etc...

      The special editions were much more thorough revisions than you seem to realise.

    6. Re:Stream splitting by greed · · Score: 1
      Uncle George considers his latest version to be the "definitive" edition of the Trilogy;

      That's it, I'm going to transfer my laserdiscs to DVD instead of buying the new editions.

      The THX LDs are the from the original theatrical release. If only I had a laserdisc machine with Dolby AC-3.... Ah well, ProLogic is better than nothing.

    7. Re:Stream splitting by bonkedproducer · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that remembers that the music the ewoks are playing at the end of ROTJ (original) was the theme song to "Sesame Street"? I'd love to know if that was credited by the way. Sure there are no english lyrics, but I can remember watching the film in the theater and singing along in my head with the tune.

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    8. Re:Stream splitting by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I'll have to check on that, but I really doubt it is the same song. Seseme Street's song had a bit more shuffle to it for one thing.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    9. Re:Stream splitting by Politburo · · Score: 1

      IIRC the T2 dvd was originally pressed as one DVD-18, but that was later changed to 2 DVD-9s because some players couldn't handle the DVD-18 (I'm not exactly sure why they couldn't since it's spec..)

    10. Re:Stream splitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - All or most all of the sceen to sceen wipes were digitally redone.
      - More critters in Mos Aisley (sp??) and other places like Cloud City
      - various special efffects cleanups like the snow fighter scenes and the land speeder

      Thats all I can remember from watching the special edidtion VHS 5 or so years ago.

    11. Re:Stream splitting by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who's Ark in Space was released in this way too. It keeps everyone happy IMHO.

    12. Re:Stream splitting by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Same thing (I think) with the Platinum Edition of Beauty and the Beast (an excellent extended edition). Three versions on 1 disc - the original, the extended and the "work in progress" edition shown at the new york film festival.

      And the extended bit in that makes sense and is enjoyable (it's an animation of a song that was added into the stage show).

    13. Re:Stream splitting by cfuse · · Score: 1
      My question is why Lucas hasn't taken advantage of that to allow certain scenes to be added/remove/changed to look like the original or enhanced version?

      Because that would be giving you a *choice*. To Lucas' mind, only his *vision* is important. The changes he has made are for his benefit, not yours. That's why it's called megalomania.

    14. Re:Stream splitting by mink · · Score: 1

      Because most DVD players up to generation 3 were nover made to conform to all of the DVD spec. Usually the more expensive players worked with everything, but everyone bought the cheapest player they could from some no name (at the time APEX was unknown cheapo player).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    15. Re:Stream splitting by zenwaves · · Score: 1

      I agree. The scenes which GL chose to delete from Attack of the Clones, like Anakin having dinner with Amidala's family, would give the film a bit more depth. It would be nice to be able to play the DVD with these scenes "spliced" back in.

  27. erratum by chegosaurus · · Score: 4, Funny

    > The first cut of Star Wars,' Burns' narrator says, 'was an unmitigated disaster.'"

    Surely he means "the first episode"?

    1. Re:erratum by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he means "Episode One". :)

  28. Greedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most annoying part about the Greedo change: the original version was a justifiable shooting in any state in the Union! Somebody's holding a gun on you and threatens your life - that's clear-cut case of self-defense, and you're entirely within your rights to shoot the bastard.

    1. Re:Greedo by Slurpee · · Score: 1

      Most annoying part about the Greedo change: the original version was a justifiable shooting in any state in the Union! Somebody's holding a gun on you and threatens your life - that's clear-cut case of self-defense, and you're entirely within your rights to shoot the bastard.

      How could George have forgotton to apply USA legal and ethical considerations when editing this scene. stupid man. Should have been the first thing he had thought off.

  29. To buy or not to buy... by TeaQuaffer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My first thought was "Buy this? In a pig's eye Jim!" But then I saw:

    The article also describes a 2.5 hour documentary by Kevin Burns that traces the origins of the saga.

    Which might make it worth it. I know I'll buy it anyway.

    This, however:

    'The first cut of Star Wars,' Burns' narrator says, 'was an unmitigated disaster.'

    Would be very, very cool to see.

    --
    Sola Deo Gloria!
  30. Review at Digital Bits by spagiola · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's an in-depth review at Digital Bits, including some screen shots of the major changes.

    1. Re:Review at Digital Bits by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
      If those are some of the changes they are HORRIBLE!

      The last scene, where Han is pointing at Jabba, is completely pathetic. It looks like Han was put in via PhotoShop. It just doesn't look correct.

      Also, the movement of whomever it is in the background so that they are partially obscured by Jabba has the same problem.

      In fact, if you look at all the new images it looks like the things were just pasted in rather than being part of the actual scene.

      One final point. In the new version Jabbas skin is too shiny. For a planet which has that much dust floating about Jabba would not be that shiny unless he just took a shower before talking to Han.

      I'm glad I've never bought any of these new and improved tapes/dvds.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Review at Digital Bits by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least the new CGI Jabba doesn't look like he's about to join forces with Pikachu.

      As for the Jabba scene, Jabba was pasted in... both in the old one and the new one. The scene was shot with a human actor, they kept the footage before Jabba was made into a giant slug, and then superimposed CGI years later when it became technically possible. The original edit is horribly animated, although in this new one, like you say, the shininess and dust does seem like an oversight... although he is a good slimy slug-creature.

      The CGI slug thing was certainly an afterthought, else Han wouldn't have walked full circle around the actor playing Jabba... that causes a lot of problems for the edit.

      Lucas apparently wanted really badly to show Jabba moving in the original edit, but it would have been too costly to devise a huge slug-puppet for such a brief scene.

  31. WTF is Greedo? by Placido · · Score: 4, Informative

    For all of you who, like me, didn't get the Greedo reference, (probably less than 1% of /.) here's a link which explains the whole Greedo and Han thingamy bob.

    Who is Greedo and what did he and Han shoot and WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ALL ABOUT?!

    --

    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
    Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
    1. Re:WTF is Greedo? by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1
      For all of you who, like me, didn't get the Greedo reference, (probably less than 1% of /.) here's a link which explains the whole Greedo and Han thingamy bob.

      And I'm going to carelessly flaunt my nerdy lame side by disagreeing with that link you provided. Or at least, here is an additional reason (my reason) that Greedo shooting first is hugely bad: redemption. I remember being a kid in a crowded theater on the opening weekend, and having a clear understanding that Han was NOT the good guy. Not evil either, but clearly in it for himself. Later in the movie, when Han swooped in to help the fight, I actually hooted and hollered, and the audience applauded and cheered. It wasn't just a simple "yay! explosions!" kind of cheering -- it was like, "holy crap, the badass is going to help!" People understood this. But if you make Han the good guy from the start, you completely undermine his turnaround. Lucas has traded character development (however rough) for political correctness. That's a crappy tradeoff, and a worse movie.

  32. Star Wars Milking by a3217055 · · Score: 1

    Star Wars has gone from a good movie with good morals to a cow which can be milked. But since I am a firm believer that if I buy the Star Wars DVD that George Lucas will get rich and A> Make enough money to STOP making StarWars sequels and retire to Vanuatu ( or some other offshore banking island ) and vanish from human existence. B> Understand what he made was so cool that he will again try to make a better set of movies. Anyway will wait for 2nd had sales on Amazon or some other online place. Also another thing interstingly I bet Joss Whedon's Serenity will definately Kick StarWars, guns with bullets vs. laser guns. People don't die instantly they go through painful Hindi movie like ... slipping into a deeper sleep kind of thing... Definately Cooler, But the lack of Light Sabre's will definately kill the emotional momments. Seriously I am looking forward to Serenity. I gave up hope on StarWars.

    1. Re:Star Wars Milking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars is about a bunch of terrorists... who wins! Is that what you call "good morals"?

    2. Re:Star Wars Milking by Portigui · · Score: 1
      Star Wars has gone from a good movie with good morals to a cow which can be milked.
      The milking of this genre has netted the man quite chunk of change. George is the 56th richest man in America worth 3 billion dollars (George Lucas).
  33. Seriously, dude by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals.
    As others have noted, it's more likely that Duke Nukem Forever will come out first. Personally, this is my position: I will not buy any version of the original Star Wars trilogy unless Lucas releases the original theatrical cut. I've already got four VHS copies of the entire trilogy (the *true* original in pan-n-scan and widescreen, and SE on pan-n-scan and widescreen), from way back before Lucas started really fucking things up with the prequels. (I'm also not going to get around it by getting someone to buy it for my birthday or for Christmas. I will not *own* these DVDs for any reason.)

    I don't care if Lucas thinks this is the way the movies were intended; as a customer, I'm not buying it from him unless he gives me what I want. Yeah, I know millions of people will buy the DVDs anyway, but that doesn't change my position.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Seriously, dude by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I thought that perhaps it had something to do with copyrighted works falling into the public domain after a period of time.

      If you restore/alter the original and change the copyright year (note these new DVDs are copyrighted 1997, the year of the SE's), then George has just bought himself (or probaly more accurately, his estate) an extra 20 years on his copyright.

      That is probably the chief motivation behind destroying the original works.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Seriously, dude by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that the original movies' copyright is not extended by this action. Otherwise it would be trivial to modify a copyrighted work slightly and re-release it every few years, and extend your copyright into perpetuity (without having to buy new laws from Congress!).

      As far as I know, the original theatrical releases of Star Wars and the Special Edition are considered separate works with separate copyright dates. When 75 years (or 90 years or whatever) have passed since 1977, Star Wars will enter the public domain (assuming copyright durations are not once again extended). The Special Edition will not enter the PD for 20 years after that, but (if it's 90 years), then in 2067, Star Wars (the original theatrical version) will enter the public domain and anyone can make infinite copies and distribute them at will, and Lucasfilm wouldn't be able to do anything about it.

      Derived works are trickier, since there are parts of the OE (Original Edition) and the SE that are identical, so a derived work based solely on one of those parts would probably qualify as copyright infringement; but a derived work based on something in the OE that is not in the SE, or based on the entire OE of one of the movies, would not be infringement.

      Of course, I'm not a copyright lawyer, all this is just based on my understanding of copyright law, blah blah.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  34. I'd like to thank George Lucas and his Minitrue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For being the first, even in spite of the RIAA and MPAA's foolishness, to establish a clear, rational reason for the average person to want to engage in data piracy.

  35. Also reported by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back, in an attempt to show the kinder, gentler, Annakin side of Darth Vader. Vader is quoted as saying to Luke "Please, please, please dont make me destroy you, this is your last warning, can I just give you a flesh wound? please..."

  36. Holding out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm still holding out for the version where Han and Greedo hug eachother.

    1. Re:Holding out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I, for a version of ROTJ in which Jabba is digitally edited into the original fat guy in a fur coat.

  37. mental...why yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Lucas] talking about his many mental and physical battles...

    He definitely has gone mental.

  38. Excellent review at The Digital Bits... by pspmikek · · Score: 2, Informative
    including shots of what was changed...

    http://www.thedigitalbits.com/reviews3/starwarstri logy.html

    1. Re:Excellent review at The Digital Bits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly one thought came to mind when I saw the second of the pictures of the "new" Emporer.

      Holy cheap prosthetic mask, Batman.

  39. its stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to be a dork to give a shit.

    Waste of time. Go find something called a female to consume your time, unlike these losers.

  40. Make it a DVD option? by daveewart · · Score: 5, Funny
    Perhaps it should be an option in the DVD menus:
    1. Greedo shoots first
    2. Han shoots first
    3. They shoot simultaneously
    4. They don't shoot each other, they have a nice chat instead
    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
    1. Re:Make it a DVD option? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      4. They don't shoot each other, they have a nice chat instead

      The French version is only available on the international DVD release.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    2. Re:Make it a DVD option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the French version also prohibits any discussion that it happened any other way.

    3. Re:Make it a DVD option? by casuist99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You jest, but why is this such a bad idea. I have no plans of buying this adulterated version of the trilogy. I could reconsider, however: DVD is a versatile enough medium that Lucas could really make it an option to view the original theatrical release (cleaned-up and digitized, of course) or the re-release with ridiculous aliens and dumb slapstick CGI which also includes Han and Greedo both shooting.

      It's only a small number of scenes that were changed by Lucas for the re-release, and now he's just changed one more. Give me the option to turn his retrospect off and watch the movies like I've always watched them. Don't make me dust off my VHS copies!

    4. Re:Make it a DVD option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      5. Han and Greedo do shots.

    5. Re:Make it a DVD option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting the trilogy should be released as a Star Wars "choose your own adventure?" It's just crazy enough to work.

    6. Re:Make it a DVD option? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You mean where Greedo surrenders preemptively to Han, then years later tells his children that he didn't surrender, he was in Le Rebellion, and fought back valiantly against the Emperor's evil grip on the galaxy?

    7. Re:Make it a DVD option? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      The option I'm waiting for? ..."Han shoots Luke"

    8. Re:Make it a DVD option? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      *movie pauses, announcer comes on*
      If you want Han to shoot first, press ONE!
      If you want Greedo to shoot first, press TWO!
      If you don't want them to shoot each other and have a nice chat instead, press THREE! /me presses ONE

      *announcer* You have pressed TWO.

      me: umm... no I didn't.

      *announcer* I'm pretty sure you did!

      sorry to Futurama.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    9. Re:Make it a DVD option? by anaesthetica · · Score: 1
      4. They don't shoot each other, they have a nice chat instead

      You forgot to add... "with the walkie talkies that have somehow replaced their guns."

    10. Re:Make it a DVD option? by Tyndmyr · · Score: 1

      Courtesy of LucasArts, Inc. Episode 4: Choose Your Own Adventure!!!!

      --
      Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
    11. Re:Make it a DVD option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta love when the pro-French moderators come in any smack around anybody who makes a joke at their expense as Flamebait, but when somebody takes a crack at the US, it's Insightful or Informative.

  41. Not that guy!!! by Meostro · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article also describes a 2.5 hour documentary by Kevin Burns that traces the origins of the saga.

    Did anyone else mis-read that as Ken Burns and think Only 2.5 hours? That must be one of his short films!

    1. Re:Not that guy!!! by cei · · Score: 1

      Of course, the documentary in question, Empire of Dreams is showing on A&E this Sunday night. Don't know if they've edited it from the DVD version or not.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
  42. Dear Mr. Lucas by thelenm · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dear Mr. Lucas,

    Please stop screwing around with these nearly 30-year old movies. All you're doing is pissing off what few fans you have left, and making yourself look like an indecisive jerk having a mid-life crisis. Thank you.

    Sincerely,
    Me

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  43. originals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have my original 35mm film projection films, so some of US can keep the dream alive, too. If only I'd gotten the REAL stuff, the 70mm film.

  44. Re:Hans and Greedo now say "over" at the same time by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    At least Greedo and Han shooting at the same time is slightly more preferable to Greedo shooting first.

    Although, you have to wonder how a killer like Greedo could miss at three feet away. Having Greedo shoot at all totally ruins the scene.

  45. Money money money by alexborges · · Score: 0, Troll

    Its his (wads of) money, his idea, his movies, his studios and his story.

    So fuck off.

    If the guy wants to turn it into the porn version of pokemon its his problem.

    --
    NO SIG
  46. CE3K - TCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CE3000?

    1. Re:CE3K - TCE by Asprin · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
  47. Has it been played out? by drsmack1 · · Score: 0

    I think that like Star Trek that Star Wars may need to be retired for a decade or two. Let a demand build and use that time to write a quality script or two. I love the idea of the series but perhaps it could be executed better.

    1. Re:Has it been played out? by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1
      I think that like Star Trek that Star Wars may need to be retired for a decade or two.


      It was (1983-1999). The result was The Phantom Menace. 'nuff said.
      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  48. Interesting Fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In an interesting correlation, that same 1% makes up the subset of slashdotters who can get themselves some pussy.

    1. Re:Interesting Fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry - I didn't get it and I can't get myself any pussy either :(.

    2. Re:Interesting Fact! by Mateito · · Score: 1

      I'm engaged, I get laid, and Greedo shoots first!

    3. Re:Interesting Fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, most of us who saw the original star wars movies in the theaters and would almost certainly get the greedo reference are married now (or have been married).

    4. Re:Interesting Fact! by julesh · · Score: 1

      actually, most of us who saw the original star wars movies in the theaters and would almost certainly get the greedo reference are married now (or have been married).

      A number of my married friends have told me that it's the same thing.

    5. Re:Interesting Fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In that case, my friend, you may want to look into Homosexuality.

      Homosexuality -- Is it for you?

    6. Re:Interesting Fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SOmething tells me that the guy with the "Pinky and the Brain" sig is in neither group....

  49. Han and Greedo... could've been worse... by Mr.+BS · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Lucas could've done a Spielberg and replace all the guns with cell phones!!!

  50. MOD ALL POSTS DOWN! by ajservo · · Score: 5, Funny

    You people aren't being hateful enough...

  51. The controvers is... by Iowaguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the original movie, Han Solo and Greedo are in the Cantina sitting at a table together. Greedo informs Han there is a bounty on his head, and threatens his life. Han in a casual sort of way shoots Greedo before he can get a shot off. In the re-release, Lucas changed this so that mean, evil Greedo shots first, but misses, and the more honorable Solo takes him down after that.

    The reason this upsets so many people is that this scene established Han Solo as an anti-hero in the movie. He was a rogue and a pragmatist. The core appeal of this character was that he was not so damn foolish as to take his chances and let someone get the first hit in, if he knew a fight was coming. Han was street smart. He would strike first to survive.

    Although many on slashdot are loathe to admitt it, this was part of the charm and good writing in the first movie that created its appeal. You had classic heroes,like skywalker. Who were good, but naive and ultimately had super powers to help them do the right thing. You also had heroes like Han who would do the right thing, but get dirty doing it. Characters like Leia were somewhere in between. She was "good" but willing to lie and sacrafice others for her cause. Reality tends to reflect this, which is why the movie spoke to so many so strongly. The changing of the Greedo scene cheapened the movie and its core complexities. Hence, the hatred on these fair forums.

    my two cents,
    -Iowa

    --
    "He who laughs last, didn't get the joke."-Cap
    1. Re:The controvers is... by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You also had heroes like Han who would do the right thing, but get dirty doing it.

      I wouldn't even go that far. Originally, Han was just about the bucks. He wanted nothing to do with saving Leia, until Luke tells him she's a rich princess who will give him a wad of dough.

      Then there's the Leia-Han "If money is all you want then thats what you'll get" (paraphrasing) scene.

      I remember having a slightly uneasy feeling about Han - like he could betray Luke and Obi-Wan at any moment. Someone would just have to offer him some more dough.

      He doesn't become a "good guy" until the closing moments of the movie, when he swoops down from nowhere to pick Darth off of Luke's tail. I remember that scene being a bit of a surprise to me, I thought Han was long gone. Sure I was a kid, and more easily misled, but that's how I remember his character.

      Lucas turned him into another white knight goody goody, and the movie already has it's share of those with Luke and Ben.

      It's been said Lucas was inspired by old samurai movies and westerns. Han was kind of like a ninja mercenary, who learns at the last minute how to "walk the true path".

      That said, it's just a movie.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:The controvers is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well spoken.

    3. Re:The controvers is... by sootman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also, if possible, imagine you're seeing the movie for the first time. You haven't seen the trilogy. You didn't dress up like Han four Halloweens in a row. Hell, you haven't even seen an Indiana Jones movie yet, and as a 10-year-old, you surely didn't watch American Graffiti a few years earlier. You don't know Harrison Ford from a hole in the wall and you don't know Han is a great guy. He ices some ugly green dude minutes before he agrees to take Ben & Luke on a ride. We know something they don't. We worry for their safety in this lunatics hand's. Etc etc etc.

      Jesus, I'm posting to SW:EP4 threads. Anything to take my mind off Ivan, I guess.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    4. Re:The controvers is... by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1
      and as a 10-year-old

      *What would really happen*

      Dad: You should watch this star wars movie. It was the best when I was a kid.

      10 year old kid: No way! I saw both those stupid Star Wars movies. Jar-Jar suxs. I'm going to play Halo next door with Jon instead. bye dad

      Dad:bye son

      *Dad opens browser, go to /. rants about "Han shoots first.")

    5. Re:The controvers is... by thegnu · · Score: 0

      Anything to take my mind off Ivan, I guess.

      It's coming right for us!!!!

      *BLAM!* *BLAM!*

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    6. Re:The controvers is... by Groovus · · Score: 1

      "It's been said Lucas was inspired by old samurai movies and westerns. Han was kind of like a ninja mercenary, who learns at the last minute how to "walk the true path"."

      To be more specific - as a rip off of Akira Kurosawa (in general), Han closely relates to the characters Toshiro Mifune usually played.

    7. Re:The controvers is... by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      I don't see that as a rip off of Kurosawa so much as an imitation of the entire genre. After all, isn't the character Scott Glenn played in "The Challenge" doing the same thing as Han about half way through the film, with Toshiro Mifune himself playing the guy who has always stuck to a code of honor (so far as we know).

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re:The controvers is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The core appeal of this character was that he was not so damn foolish as to take his chances

      Which makes it a bigger change of heart, when Han swoops in and saves the day in the finale...

    9. Re:The controvers is... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Exactly. When I watched it, I wasn't sure what was next with Han. Was he a bad guy or a good guy?

  52. They talked about this at Dragon*Con by JLSigman · · Score: 1

    It'll be a 4-disc set, with the 4th disc having a 2 1/2 hour making of the trilogy special, as well as other stuff. The making of looks interesting, because it'll have clips of the original casting calls and try-outs.

    LucasFilms also will be released the old cartoons and Ewoks specials on DVD this month.

    --
    -jls
    Techno-pagan
  53. Get the original LD versions with Bittorrent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can find the originals at http://suprnova.org/ (see the Movies section) and get them with Bittorrent. It's also available at gazillion other places. Illegal in some countries, legal in others, but personally I think it's only right (in moral sense) that since I have the original THX release from -97 in VHS I can download this.

    I would buy the DVD if it were available, but too bad for Lucasfilm. I'll never touch these new versions that have gone through socialist revisionism (the term that JMS, creator of B5 likes to use).

    The release you can get is the "Definitive collection". Made from CAV-Laserdiscs and mastered with *good* comb filter, it also includes commentary track, menus, and there's also the supplemental disc with bonus materials. Anamorphic (altough the LD's are not), and the soundtracks are the original sorround mix, probably taken directly from LD-players digital out.

    You can get the original LD's from eBay altough they are getting rare these days...and players even more so.

    And on a related note, you can also find the Star Wars holiday special..George didn't get rid of it after all. I'm wondering if we could make a deal to George: Release the original versions on DVD and HD-DVD or Bluray(whenever it comes) and all the Geeks will in exchange destroy Holiday Special from the Internet...

  54. A lesson from David Lean... by eamacnaghten · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I remember once David Lean saying in an interview that once a picture of his was finished, then it was finished! It was a work of creation and no-one should change it retrospectively, not even him.

    There is a scene in Lawrence of Arabia where you see a camel riding slowly towards O'Toole taking time to do it. This was the entrance of Omar Sherif. Afterwards David Lean said he got it wrong, and that that particular buildup ended too quickly, however, he did NOT change it for the reasons given.

    Although George Lucas's modifications to the original Star Wars Trilogy may be making it more cinematically pleasing, and maybe even more to how he would have liked it to originally turn out, what he is doing could be interpreted as defacing. The original Star Wars Trilogy are works of art in themselves.

    Everyone would have thought it ridiculous if Picasso took some of his earlier work back, and touched it up to make it more realistic, or in fashion. I think the same way about the Star Wars Films.

    --

    Web Sig: Eddy Currents

    1. Re:A lesson from David Lean... by mbbac · · Score: 1

      You're giving Lucas way too much credit.

      --

      mbbac

    2. Re:A lesson from David Lean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but there IS a new version of Lawrence, created in the 1980s with about a reel or so of extra footage. That's the one that's widely available on home video. The previous version can be found on old pan&scan laserdiscs, but I haven't seen it. They added footage, but didn't change anything in the footage that existed, unlike Lucas...

    3. Re:A lesson from David Lean... by multimed · · Score: 1

      While I agree that it is wrong for "others" to change a work, I can't say that I agree about the creator. Ignoring for the moment the difficulty of ownership of a creative work especially with something as collaborative as a movie...if Picasso had wanted to change one of his paintings, why shouldn't he have been able to whatever he damn well pleased? All the more so with books, music and movies where the artist can change their creating without taking away the original. If you don't like Lucas's changes you don't have to watch or even acknowledge them, stick with the originals. I'm not saying that it's a wise decision for Lucas, only that an artist should be able to do what they want with their creation. Of course personally I find the "derivative works" additions to the copyright clause to be harmful to art, creativity and society in general, so I partially see the right of an artist to change their work as a good thing because they're the only one's that can even if in a specific case, I may believe they've ruined it.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    4. Re:A lesson from David Lean... by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

      Good argument, but there were a hell of alot of different edits of Lawrence. Mostly for time issues, but Lean was involved with some of them.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    5. Re:A lesson from David Lean... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Was he? I thought the later restorations had Scorsese involved. Also, there can be a difference between a restoration, a "directors cut" and a re-edit.

      I'd classify them such:-
      restoration. cleaned up, any footage missing from original edit added back in.
      directors cut. re-edited by the director in his original vision. that's a one-off. You declare your version, you can't do it again without calling it...
      reedit. director changes his original vision (sometimes also called a special edition).

      The problem I have with Star Wars is that he's not doing a Spartacus and putting something back in that should have always been there or showing it how he wanted it. AFAICT What he's really doing is adding something that he couldn't have done at the time because of the technology.

    6. Re:A lesson from David Lean... by Val314 · · Score: 1

      there is one difference between Picasso changing hist Pictures and Lucas changing the movie:

      Picasso's original Pictures would be lost, but the original Movie could still be out there.

    7. Re:A lesson from David Lean... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Everyone would have thought it ridiculous if Picasso took some of his earlier work back, and touched it up to make it more realistic, or in fashion.

      This actually happened in Australia... Jeffrey Smart, a relatively well-known painter here, was having an exhibition at one of the big state/national galleries (AGNSW?), and noticed that a work he'd done 30-odd years ago was looking a bit drab -- so he touched it up. It was on loan to the gallery from a private owner at the time, and the owner wasn't too happy about this.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  55. Branching... by antdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's called branching. Didn't T2:Ultimate Edition have a lot of problems with many DVD players even software players until updates came out? I know WinDVD did when T2:UE first came out.

    Not sure if this still happens now.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Branching... by cei · · Score: 1

      T2: Ultimate Edition was one of the first really large-scale DVD-18 releases (double-sided, dual layer = 15GB capacity). If I remember correctly, WAMO had a pretty strong commitment from Artisan before actually buying the manufacturing equipment necessary to press these discs, and there were a large number of bad burns (coasters) in the manufacturing process. At some point later (not sure when) the aluminum Ultimate Edition case contained 2 DVD-9s instead, and I haven't heard much about DVD-18 as a format since then.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    2. Re:Branching... by antdude · · Score: 1

      cei: Wow, that's interesting. I wonder if these T2:UE (hard metallic/titanium cases which I have) are very rare now? :D

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  56. Stop it. by juuri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously people stop supporting this nonsense. Even if you don't plan on buying all these hacks, this constant deluge of information about changes, edits and new editions of this crap is still supporting this garbage by keeping up the visible mindshare capital of this franchise.

    I don't believe any of these pictures are classics or sacred treasures but these films are not like Director's Cuts where the original vision was changed to get the movie to market, no matter what Georgie says. He is 'Robin Williamsing' these things because of his change in character after become a parent. That is, some famous actors, directors, etc... at some point feel everything they've done should some how be compatible with things their kids could watch.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:Stop it. by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they're making the changes to restart the copyright clock... ie. get some 20 odd years back from us. It allows them to whop a big "copyright 2004" notice all over it.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:Stop it. by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      It's like Tolstoi. At one point he had this big change of heart, said all the work he had done in the past was crap, and said he would destroy it all if he could. What if he had? No War and Peace, no Anna Karenina.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    3. Re:Stop it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's like Tolstoi. At one point he had this big change of heart, said all the work he had done in the past was crap, and said he would destroy it all if he could. What if he had? No War and Peace, no Anna Karenina.

      No Anna Kurnikova? Oh man, it would SUCK!

  57. Give me 12, er, 18 films by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Give me the original 6 or hopefully 9 movies AND the same movies re-done to Lucas's liking.

    If there's enough room - think Blue-Ray or other HD formats - put BOTH versions of a movie on the same disc and make it easy to switch between the two on a per-scene basis, or even watch both versions side-by-side.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  58. Physical battles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talking about his many mental and physical battles to finish filming

    Uh...physical battles? I suppose it would be hard to slither off the dais in order to play the role of the new Jabba...

  59. untouched originals? by SSR · · Score: 1

    "I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals."

    Give me a break!!! You KNOW compromises galore exists in the movie making process, and yes the 'Cut" from that ie, movie release gets it's day, but to be fortunate enough to be able to go back and 'touch up' the story and the scenes has it's place too!

    Star Wars clearly is worthy of refinement, indeed requires refinement because it is used extensively in many mediums, the CCG (Collectable Card Game, and yes ppl still play them), the online game Galaxies (Ontinarri, Eclipse =) and ongoing books and comics...

    May the Force be with you, always.

  60. Biggest irony... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lucas on colorizing the three stooges.

    "Star Wars" creator George Lucas, who testified with Steven Spielberg before Congress in the 1980s against colorization and other forms of alteration, said the process yanks such slapstick performers as the Stooges out of the black-and-white universe they belong in.

    "Would color distract from their comedy and make it not as funny anymore?" Lucas said. "Maybe just the fact that they're in black and white makes it funny, because their humor is dated. But by putting it in black and white, it puts it in a context where you can appreciate it for what it was.

    "But you try to make it in full living color and try to compare it to a Jim Carrey movie, then it's hard for young people to understand. Because you're then thinking you're comparing apples to apples, when you're not. You're comparing apples to oranges. I'm saying it's not fair to the artist."


    Part of Star Wars' charm was that while the special effects were advanced for the time, they were NOT excessive to any degree beyond being how they directly supported the plot. The extra things running around Mos Eisley, windows in Bespin... it just started being more distractive than immersive. The only two I absolutely agreed with were putting in the Jabba scene (yeah, it wasn't done well, but it did actually help establish Han a little more) and fixing the Hoth shots so you couldn't see AT-ATs through the actual instrument panel. (I'd never noticed before on small TV's, but almost a must for a high-quality DVD on large TVs.)

    Don't get me started on Guido shooting first, that completely changed Han's daring go-for-it attitude as a lawless smuggler out only for himself. Having them shoot at the same time I can accept logically. Han decides to shoot, Guido sees it in his eyes and shoots as well. Of course, Guido missing makes little sense at 3 feet, but if he had hit him it would have been a pretty short movie. What really bugs me about this change was that it was never "I wanted to do this, but I couldn't", it was "I've changed my mind about how much of a lawless guy Han was at the beginning, thus weakening his story arc as he progressed to a caring person."

    Huh, guess I got myself going. Anyway, I guess I'll go hit the local antique and pawn shops to see if anyone's ignorant mothers have turned in the laserdiscs of the originals...

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    1. Re:Biggest irony... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Don't get me started on Guido shooting first [...]

      Oh, great...Lucas has gone and turned the cantina scene into something from The Godfather.

      "That's a nice Wookiee you've got there, Mr. Solo...it'd be a real shame if something happened to him..."

    2. Re:Biggest irony... by BigJimSlade · · Score: 1

      > Don't get me started on Guido shooting first [...]

      Oh, great...Lucas has gone and turned the cantina scene into something from The Godfather.


      Worse yet...

      The Godfather Part III!

    3. Re:Biggest irony... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I HATE the Jaba scene in Star Wars. It was the WORST change in all the movies. I really wish I could get the unadulterated theatrical releases on DVD. Also, am I the only person who still calls it Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi? "A New Hope" just doesn't work for me. Lucas should watch the LOTR extended editions. Now that's the way to make an extended edition.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Biggest irony... by shades6666 · · Score: 1

      I HATE the Jaba scene in Star Wars. It was the WORST change in all the movies

      I would contend that the "Singer" bouncing around the cantina was the worst scene change. Aside from being incredibly annoying it destroyed the mood. The new Jabba scene is a close second though.

      Also, am I the only person who still calls it Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi? "A New Hope" just doesn't work for me.

      You're certainly not the only one. It took me a while to figure out what this ANH acronymn eveyone is throwing around was.

  61. Never give up hope by Sith+Lord+Dormammu · · Score: 1

    this comment might have been already been made Lucas will never release the version of Star Wars that came out in the 70's, that version does not exist to him. I would suggest those who want the un-funked version to either look into the Laser Disk version or VHS.

  62. The Solo Rodian trials by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Forget Snopes & monkeys. This is where the real action is.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    1. Re:The Solo Rodian trials by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Favourite bit: 'Midichlorians vs. the Divine Force: What should be taught in schools?'

      That has to be the geekiest comic I've ever read ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  63. *sigh* by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I'm old enough to have seen them all in their original theatrical releases. I think this was a great series of movies, and even enjoy the 'prequels' so far. I enjoy these films. I put Phantom Menace in the DVD player last month to torture test my reassembled home theater system, and we all couldn't resist - just had to plunk down on the couch and watch the whole thing. I own a select library of DVDs - but I have everything Star Wars (and everything Coen Bros - when you're good, you're good.).

    I think his only terrible mistake so far is Hayden Christensen - he's so amateur he must be rubbing off on Natalie Portman (given her otherwise amazing performances in Professional, Anywhere, etc.) because she's way under her game for too long in these films.

    Having said that, it's an artist's right to modify his work. Some famously - Michaleangelo later chiseled his name across the Pieta (pissed because viewers atrributed it to other artists), Van Gogh reworked the moon in Starry Night (it was nearly full, he made it a crescent) and Sargent must have ticked off Isabella Gardner - either she just finished eating or he reworked her smile... Alan Bean re-highlights aspects of his paintings when they are shot for prints...

    This is not a big deal - and remember, Lucas was trying to pull off one of the biggest leapfrogs in cinema history, given that he didn't have the technology to do it all at the time. I don't begrudge him making these changes. Can he fix everything? Not in time to get this thing out the door realistically, and plain old goofs can stand. They are hardly noticed if you're watching the film as a film. Which is what this is all about - rousing stories of amazing things we don't see every day. This is escapism, not documentary, and what really counts is the action and drama.

    I don't mind sounds in space, and I'm a scientist. If I heard them on NASA TV I'd take notice.
    Things that can be done to knit the series together are fine.
    Dramatic enhancements - great.
    Better effects - bring them on.

    It'd be nice if the originals were around too, and sooner or later I'd bet they do release them, but you have to pick the low hanging fruit first, and today's audiences (and technology) demand great quality of great films.

    Imagine a DVD of the remaining print of Lawrence of Arabia before they jumped thru hoops to make it work with current technology and look on the cinema as it did at its release.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:*sigh* by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      The problem is Lucas has already sworn that he will never release the orginals on DVD. Ever.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  64. no, no no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we need to marklar their marklar, for Marklar!

  65. Come on... by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given the angle of the blast, we can deduce that Han did not, in fact, shoot guedo. There must have been a second gunner!

    On the grassy knoll, of course.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Come on... by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 4, Funny

      However, Six Seconds in Tattooine provides testimonies from witnesses that were never called before the Palpatine Commission, and these indicate that there were no less than three separate shots fired. Also, don't you find it suspicious that Han Solo, a known Wookie sympathizer, would be fingered as the lone gunman? Why do we never hear mention of his Hutt gang connections, going back several years? His checkered history with Lando Calrissian, the very man who would one day encase him in carbonite? And who, as we well know, was the second Death Star shooter?

      But of course the most valuable piece of evidence is the original, unedited Lucas film. If we play the scene repeatedly in excruciatingly slow motion, you can clearly see Greedo's head moves back... and to the left. Back... and to the left. Back... and to the left. Back... and to the left.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  66. you're lucky you don't taste so good. by drew · · Score: 1

    Did he at least put this line back in? what reason could he possibly have had for taking that out?

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    1. Re:you're lucky you don't taste so good. by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      There were several audio tracks recorded for ESB when it was originally filmed. IIRC, the audio track with the line "...you don't taste very good" that appeared on the original VHS transfers had been damaged to the point where it couldn't be lifted. For that scene, the production team had to use one of the alternate tracks for the remastering.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  67. Unmitigated disaster by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    'The first cut of Star Wars,' Burns' narrator says, 'was an unmitigated disaster.'

    When I first read that, I thought he was talking about TPM... sadly, we get no admission that TPM was dreck :(

    1. Re:Unmitigated disaster by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, if you watch the documentary on the TPM DVD, they show Lucas and posse sitting down in a screening room and watching the first 'final' cut of TPM, and when it's over, they're all just stting there, with 'oh FUCK' looks on their faces. The voice over of one of them confirms it, as well, as I recall.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  68. OMG by Geek+Boy · · Score: 0

    I'm going to pee my pants! My life is now complete!!! I worship you George Lucas.

  69. Disappointed in you geeks by gmletzkojr · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am so disappointed in you geeks - with a picture like Leia and her stunt double sunbathing in *the* outfit (at the Time magazine link), you guys are worried about who shot who first. Shouldn't we all be talking about whether or not that footage is included in the special edition?

    *I hang my head in shame.*

    --
    I for one welcome our new [insert main topic] overlords.
    1. Re:Disappointed in you geeks by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I am so disappointed in you geeks - with a picture like Leia and her stunt double sunbathing in *the* outfit (at the Time magazine link),

      You tryin' to tell us that after all this time, Jabba shot first?

  70. Re:Hans and Greedo now say "over" at the same time by Mateito · · Score: 4, Funny
    All guns are now replaced with walkie talkies.

    Han shouts first!

  71. Kevin Burns? Any relation to Ken Burns? by jeblucas · · Score: 1
    Kevin Burns?
    The article also describes a 2.5 hour documentary by Kevin Burns that traces the origins of the saga.
    Is there some sort of analogy here?

    George Lucas:Good Director::Kevin Burns:Ken Burns

    --
    blarg.
    1. Re:Kevin Burns? Any relation to Ken Burns? by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      According to the article: no relation, he's just an true fanatic, apparently.

  72. Star Wars 3 Trailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we're on the topic of Star Wars, anyone willing to venture a guess as to when the Episode 3 trailer will be coming out? (i.e., approx, how early did the episode 1, 2 trailers come out -- I'm sure there's a geek out there who would know that)

  73. Why does everyone ignore... by ImaLamer · · Score: 5, Funny


    Why is everyone trying to act like it's not a big deal that R2-D2 and C-3P0 are being replaced with Crow and Tom Servo?

    1. Re:Why does everyone ignore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it sound like that's a bad thing!
      -Wonderduck

  74. Get Yours! by mishmash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Amazon have the DVD [US] | DVD UK both with delivery on the day of release.
    Amazon often dispatch items a day or so before the release date, meaning you could get the edge over the masses by following this route!!

    1. Re:Get Yours! by pdangel · · Score: 4, Funny

      I cant believe after 4 years of lurking i registered on /. just so I could post this. WALMART PRE ORDER
      Dont feed the monkeys. and yes I could have posted AC.

    2. Re:Get Yours! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but which one's best... amazon's got free shipping, but I guess paying for shipping to get it ASAP is what I'll want --- UK offers Priority shipping... yet walmat is 11 cents cheaper....

    3. Re:Get Yours! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Yes! Wal-mart and Amazon.com! There are two great upstanding companys that we should all be supporting! Why don't slashdotters put their money where their mouth is and spend a buck or two extra to purchase your crap from a company that is not infested with IP lawyers and/or reducing the quality of life of thousands of working class americans.

      Why don't slashdotters put their money where their mouth is... I just realized, does that phrase mean that you are supposed to eat your money or just shove a wad of bills in your mouth and stand there?

  75. Finally a good reason to RTFA by freqres · · Score: 1

    For those who don't RTFA, I have the reason to do it. Check out the Time article. On the first page is a picture of Carrie Fischer and her stunt double dressed in the Jabba whore outfit suntanning. May the Schwartz(tm) be with you.

    --
    Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
  76. These films were being changed from Day One by PonyHome · · Score: 1

    I don't know how anybody can see the "original" version. Lucas was editing and re-releasing them from the very start, shifting scenes, cutting scenes, changing dialogue. When I first went to see the film, it had been out about two days. There is a scene on the Death Star where a bunch of Storm Troopers are chasing Han and Luke, and they yell "Close the Blast Doors, Close the Blast Doors!" And as the pair escape through the closing doors, they yell "Open the Blast Doors!" which I found very funny, and still would, if it existed. When I went back to see it a couple of weeks later, that line was gone, and has never come back. I guess having a sense of humor was not something Mr. Lucas wished to be known for. There were probably other, less conspicuous changes that didn't really catch my attention because I'd only seen the film once.

    Mr. Lucas is a fiddler, a perfectionist, and he can't leave anything alone, even if his changes are widely viewed by his fans as being for the worse. Some creative types are like that. Picasso, for example, never considered one of his most famous paintings "La Damselles d'Avignon" as finished, and kept mucking around with it, making small changes, for over forty years, which must have driven fans of the painting absolutely spare.

    1. Re:These films were being changed from Day One by drxenos · · Score: 1

      That can't be right. That scene is on *all* the VHS versions I own.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    2. Re:These films were being changed from Day One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is a scene on the Death Star where a bunch of Storm Troopers are chasing Han and Luke, and they yell "Close the Blast Doors, Close the Blast Doors!" And as the pair escape through the closing doors, they yell "Open the Blast Doors!" which I found very funny, and still would, if it existed."

      It exsists on the laserdisc and first vhs version.

    3. Re:These films were being changed from Day One by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      Actually, I *think* that line is on the surround sound tracks and got dropped on the first VHS releases. I know the "I think we took a wrong turn" "...a wrong turn" echo had the same thing happen to it.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  77. I hope they fix..... by Nascar_Geek · · Score: 0

    the part where Han swaps that small bag of sand for the gold idol. Everybody knows that he would have needed a MUCH bigger bag of sand to match the weight of that thing. Sheesh, pay attention people.

  78. You forgot... by d41d8cd98f00b204e980 · · Score: 0
    1. Greedo shoots first
    2. Han shoots first
    3. They shoot simultaneously
    4. They don't shoot each other, they have a nice chat instead

    5. Who cares?

  79. Referral ID in link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Way to go, Reducer2001, by slipping that referral ID into the link for the box set. On a Star Wars thread, too boot; it's sure to generate a lot of cash.

  80. Static/Dynamic Art by Lemming+Mutiny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to be a musician, and one of the frequent ideological debates I would engage in with other musicians was based around the concept of static or dynamic art. Many of them felt that once a song was done, it was done! No more revisions, this is the song in its final form. Why? If I happen to think of a better way for the rythymn to groove behind a riff, who cares if it was one year after the song was originally written. Ultimately we all fall into one of two camps: those who believe art is static, and those who believe it is (or can be) dynamic. I think the reason most people are so upset with Lucas' revisionism is because they feel that he is messing with the mythology of their childhoods. But I have news for those people: the release of Episodes I & II has already done that. Sadly, STAR WARS now belong in a category with Highlander and the Matrix: the first movies (first 3 in the case of star wars) exist on their own (as the masterpieces that they are), with the subsequent sequels existing in an alternate reality.

  81. FUCK OFF AND DIE BITCH! STAR WARS SUCKS ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better?

  82. Greedo shot first god damn it... by Rebel_Princess · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm quite pissed that Han and Greedo shoot simultaneously. Seriously, what kinda bullshit is that? I want Lucas to release it as it was originally intended in 1997, with Greedo shooting first.

    Stop raping my 20's Lucas!! *shakes fist*

    1. Re:Greedo shot first god damn it... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Well Greedo being a bounty hunter, if he did in fact shoot first and missed, thus allowing Han to shoot and kill him, he wasn't very good at his job and probably would have wound up dead far earlier in his career.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    2. Re:Greedo shot first god damn it... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Fuck that. I want him to release it as he originally wrote it, with Han getting bitchy and whiny and greedo just slunking off. Then Obi-wan just kills both of them. he was an evil dude as it was originally written.

      Stop raping my pre-birth, lucas!!

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Greedo shot first god damn it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit raping my afterbirth . . .

      oh nevermind.

      --AC

  83. The Originals by syntap · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals."

    Well, if you really want them you can get them from overseas. Didn't say they are official releases but hey, George is only losing out if you are preventing a sale of an identical item, and an identical item doesn't exist on DVD.

    1. Re:The Originals by syntap · · Score: 1

      And yes, overseas from everywhere :)

  84. OMG....Go outside! by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

    Bitch bitch bitch, whine whine whine, greedo shoots first.

    Dear lord, get over it....you should be HAPPY, hes meeting you in the middle.

    Ugh.

    --

    "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
  85. No Surprise by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0

    George Lucas is the guy who claims there should be a law that says if you buy a sculpture from the sculptor and put it on your lawn and paint it blue, the sculptor should have the right to repossess it or sue you or something.

    He's a nut.

    Besides, somebody tell me how Qeedo could be pointing his piece directly at Han from three feet AND fire at the same time and NOT hit Han.

    That's one piss-poor piece of blaster proficiency for a bounty hunter. Boba Fett would turn over in his grave (or the stomach of that thing that ate him.)

    I saw the "enhanced" version where they added Jabba to the original - these idiots took the EXACT SAME DIALOGUE uttered by Han elsewhere and shoehorned it into the scene.

    It couldn't have stood out more if you'd painted Jabba blue.

    But if somebody did that, Lucas would have sued him.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:No Surprise by Hassman · · Score: 1

      I saw the "enhanced" version where they added Jabba to the original - these idiots took the EXACT SAME DIALOGUE uttered by Han elsewhere and shoehorned it into the scene

      Actually that scene was shot originally but cut. Jabba was played by a fat Irish man. All they did was cut him out and put in a Jabba.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    2. Re:No Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is the original audio Harrison Ford recorded back in '76 for that scene with Jabba you dumbass. stop assuming things

    3. Re:No Surprise by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      So they cut that scene and moved the audio into another scene, and now they've put it back in BOTH places?

      Still stupid.

      Dumbass.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  86. OMG!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They shoot at the SAME TIME!!! Holy $h1t!!

  87. THX version by Hassman · · Score: 1

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Give me the THX remasted version.

    Better sound, better picture quality, original movies...that is all I want.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  88. Full List of DVD Changes by diver8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    From theforce.net (http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002 /16704309/?596)

    ---LIST OF DVD CHANGES---

    A NEW HOPE

    Confirmed :

    - The opening crawl has been re-done to match the colour/quality of the PT opening crawl.
    - Lightsaber effects have been fixed. The colours now appear more vibrant and the blades better defined.
    - The lettering on various Death Star panels will be written in Aurebesh rather than English.
    - An improved version of Jabba inserted into his scenes.
    - Greedo still shoots first...however, Han's reaction is 'much more realistic'.
    - R2's panels will be consistantly blue in all of the space shots, instead of just a few of them.
    - The Dianoga now appears more lifelike and not so obviously Stop-Motion.
    - The matte-painted hall in the detention block has been fixed rather than just having a bright white light at one end.

    Rumoured :

    - Stormtrooper voices redubbed by Temura Morrison (Jango Fett).
    - The Emperor may possibly make an appearence to address the Senate in a new scene.
    - The Imperial March may be inserted into the score in certain parts to maintain continuity with the other films.
    - The 'Binary Sunset' shot outside the Homestead could have clouds to match Luke's later POV shot.
    - Rumours of work on Obi-Wan's death scene with CGI.
    - Door closings/openings could be smoothed out without the frame jumps.
    - Rumour that the aliens and other creatures blink now to make them look non-mask like.
    - Vader and Obi-Wan's fight scene may be upgraded with CGI work.
    - Battle of Yavin shots cleaned up and recomped.

    Denied rumours:

    - Bail Organa will not be in ANH, for when Alderaan blows up.

    THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK

    Confirmed :

    - The opening crawl has been re-done to match the colour/quality of the PT opening crawl.
    - Lightsaber effects have been fixed. The colours now appear more vibrant and the blades better defined.
    - Ian McDiarmid is now in place for Emperor Palpatine's scene, rather than the monkey-eyed old woman. There are also a couple of new lines in this scene.

    Rumoured :

    - The Tauntauns could be re-done with CGI.
    - Rumour that the missing Wampa Attack sequence may be back into the beginning of the film .
    - 'Grander escape sequence' between Lando, Leia, Chewie, C3PO and R2 in Cloud City.
    - Possible additional deleted scene(s) with Yoda on Dagobah.
    - Boba Fett's voice redubbed by Temura Morrison (Jango Fett).

    RETURN OF THE JEDI

    Confirmed :

    - The opening crawl has been re-done to match the colour/quality of the PT opening crawl.
    - Lightsaber effects have been fixed. The colours now appear more vibrant and the blades better defined.
    - Hayden Christensen appears at the end of the film in place of Sebastian Shaw as 'Ghost Anakin'.
    - The Rancor's matte-lines have been removed.
    - Naboo now appears in the end celebration sequence.
    - In Vader's death scene, Shaw's eyes have been recoloured (to match Hayden's) and his eyebrows removed (as they would never have survived).

    Rumoured :

    - Palpatine's Force Lightning may have been re-done.
    - Rumour that the Jedi Temple now appears in the background of Coruscant during the end celebration sequence.
    - Work done on background matte-paintings.
    - Rumour that the Ewoks have had CGI work done to animate their facial features.
    - Rumour that Watto appears during the Tatooine celebration sequence at the end.

    Denied rumours:

    - Padme does not appear at the end alongside the ghosts of Anakin, Ben, and Yoda.

    MISC INFO

    Audio Quality

    - "I spoke with Ben Burtt recently. He mentioned the upcoming Star Wars DVDs. It seems that they were able

    --
    Check my journal for gmail invites!
    1. Re:Full List of DVD Changes by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Bail Organa will not be in ANH, for when Alderaan blows up.

      I don't know, these re-releases are such low comedy anyway, that I think they should put this in. I might pay good money to see Jimmy Smits looking up and going "What the? Oh no! AIEEE!!!"

    2. Re:Full List of DVD Changes by diver8 · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, all spoilers seem to indicate that Jar Jar Binks will end up on Alderaan at the end of episode 3... so, at least a small bit of solace.

      Oh mesa! dat's no moon! dat's a space station!

      --
      Check my journal for gmail invites!
    3. Re:Full List of DVD Changes by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing the info on the clean up of the negatives and the color timing adjustments. More than anything else (or rather in spite of everything else), that little tidbit of information has convinced me to get this box set. I can tolerate the digital mucking around, the lack of deleted scenes, and the fact that this set is just a stepping stone to a more fully featured six-disc set in a year or two, because the movies will look better than any other edition currently at my disposal.

    4. Re:Full List of DVD Changes by dghcasp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      - Hayden Christensen appears at the end of the film in place of Sebastian Shaw as 'Ghost Anakin'.

      I wonder how this affects actor's residuals... I see several possibilities:

      (1) Shaw stops getting residuals because he's effectively no longer in the picture

      (2) Shaw still gets residuals because he was in the picture, just you can't see him anymore

      (3) Christensen sues Shaw for all the back residuals, since Lucas is effectively ret-conning the movie, and Christensen now always played ghost Anikin.

      (4) Everyone dies. No, wait, that was Hamlet.

    5. Re:Full List of DVD Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well Shaw is dead now, so either his family gets the money or George gets to keep the money

    6. Re:Full List of DVD Changes by nedder · · Score: 1

      Rumoured : - The Tauntauns could be re-done with CGI - Nope
      - Rumour that the missing Wampa Attack sequence may be back into the beginning of the film - Nope
      - 'Grander escape sequence' between Lando, Leia, Chewie, C3PO and R2 in Cloud City - Nope
      - Possible additional deleted scene(s) with Yoda on Dagobah - Nope
      - Boba Fett's voice redubbed by Temura Morrison (Jango Fett) - Yep (badly too)

      Who at theforce.net compiled this bunch of nonsense?

      Other confirmed details (off the top of my head):

      -no shockwave when the AT-AT destroys the power generator, shockwaves were all the rage in '97 with stupid games like Incoming

      -Vader still says "inform the command ship that my shuttle bla bla bla" instead of "bring my shuttle" as in OTR

      -Luke still says "you were lucky to get out of there" rather than the original and much funnier, "you're lucky you don't taste very good" (Dagoba)

      -Snowmonster still shown, and he still looks like a guy in a fur suit

      -Luke doesn't scream like a little bitch when jumping off (as he did in the SE's)

    7. Re:Full List of DVD Changes by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

      now if only they could something about the haircuts.

      --
      Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
  89. Re:Hans and Greedo now say "over" at the same time by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Although, you have to wonder how a killer like Greedo could miss at three feet away.

    Maybe he's had Stormtrooper training.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  90. Kid Movie by nemski · · Score: 0, Troll

    Correct me if I am wrong (and I'm sure you will), but isn't Star Wars meant for a 6-year-old rather than a 37-year-old programmer who is bilingual in Klingon?

    --
    Some people have a way with words, others not have way.
  91. Spaceballs by Go+Aptran · · Score: 1

    So now Mel Brooks needs to come out with a Special Edition with souped up graphics that clash with the rest of the film, CGI John Candy, and Rick Moranis replaced by Hayden Christiansen's older less successful brother, Tove Christiansen.

    --

    "Under the spreading chestnut tree, I sold you and you sold me."

  92. Obiwan dies in this one for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What about the lightsaber that never hits Obiwan? Vader goes to kill him, Obiwan sayes "If you strike me down I will become more powerful than you could ever imagine" (or something like that). Vader swings, Obiwan "dies" before it ever touches him. I guess Lucas did not care to correct that

  93. Call to all Lucas-haters by rd_syringe · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It is imperative that we use the word "rape" as many times as we can in describing the changes made to a science fiction film from the 70s. Most importantly, try to fit in the phrase "Lucas raped my childhood," but really, any sort of bizarre hyperbolic use of the word "rape" is mandatory.

  94. Respect not likely by ebuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see.

    I could respect a director who makes a controversial film decision (Han shoots first) provided that the film is made well, and it doesn't look like a mistake (see my film because it's controversial trash)

    I could respect a director who admits to making a mistake in a film (or believes that his greater vision was compromised at first release) and rereleases the film with corrections (Greedo shoots first) provided that the film is remade well, and it doesn't look like he's just caving into a compromised version of his vision.

    But I can't respect this. Either Lucas is stating that his vision was for Han to be a chior boy in bad boy clothing, or that his vision wasn't important enough to stand by, or that he has no vision, he's just doing whatever the polls say.

    After watching Kirosawa's "The Hidden Fortress", I am fully convinced that the success of Star Wars was part plagarisim and part mistake. Lucas's disneyland inspired lightening up of the film in it's theatrical re-relase was touted as being closer to his true "vision". Every improvement detracted from the story and lightened the tone of the film. I mean, Luke's family was just killed, and we're supposed to be laughing at visual gags when it's time to go find Han. "Empire Strikes Back" probably was saved due to the extra help he brought aboard. Help which he now eschews in the episode 1-3 films.

    Let's face it. We'll never have a good Star Wars until the Master stops driving his Empire into the ground in the name of Profit.

    1. Re:Respect not likely by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Han shooting first is absolutely vital. It sets him up as a guy not to be trifled with, and someone who won't give someone the chance to wipe him out. In an old swashbuckler, he wouldn't have thrown the other fella his sword to carry on.

      It also helps set up one of the most important moments in the film.

  95. Please sign the petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There is a petition on the internet requesting that George Lucas releases the originals untouched. Please sign it.

  96. Why is this opinion so common... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid I'll be waiting for the day when George reconsiders and releases the untouched originals.

    I don't really get was this is all about... Sometimes, geeks motivate this by saying that the Special Edition incorrectly makes Han Solo look less like who he is, but come on, the entire TRILOGY shows pretty well who he is. Lucas just changed some tiny bits here and there; how can those changes be so important? So you can re-live your geek childhood by watching the original??

    I just don't get it... How can a few scenes totalling in just minutes turn one movie from "woo, I must have!" into "meh, unbuyable"? They might affect the plot somewhat, but when looking at the big picture, they definitely don't.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Why is this opinion so common... by Howler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, for me personally, the only scene that I don't like is the same one everyone else agrees upon, where Greedo shoots first.

      I think it was much better character development showing the "scoundrel" side of Han prior to his involvement with Obi-Wan, Luke and the rebellion. It shows the change in the character from a that of an almost thug to the "good guy".

      While I agree that the trilogy as a whole does a pretty good job of this, I think that having Han shoot first shows that the character journeyed a longer road.

  97. Eureka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so he can sell it to them. It's not because he cares what you think on a personal level. He cares only on a financial level.

    And that my friends is how economies work. I sell you a hot dog, and I don't ask if your a furry. yea!

    1. Re:Eureka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't confound economy with libertarianism. They are still different things (although we are being brainwashed into thinking they're the same).

  98. Re:I think it's obvious what we need to do by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

    That episode of South Park really nailed the issue of modifing old movies, especially with the fake commerical for the "new and improved South Park" episodes.

  99. one good thing by glsunder · · Score: 1

    One good thing about lucus "fixing" ep4-6 is that he might fix ep1-3 in the future. Fix number one: Anikan poops first (before going on set).

  100. First cut is not the released cut. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article the first cut was never released, it was re-edited in a completely different form. From my recollection the original theatrical release actually won an Oscar for Best Film Editing in 1977.

    1. Re:First cut is not the released cut. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 1

      How is this troll, *both* statements are 100% true, Lucas fired the original editor as mentioned in the film and Star Wars *DID* win an oscar for Best Film Editing in 1997, who the heck is moderating this?

    2. Re:First cut is not the released cut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Star Wars *DID* win an oscar for Best Film Editing in 1997


      1997? Are you sure?
  101. Stop the Second Guessing by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please don't turn this release into an E.T. Anniversary Edition where, among other things, the guns are replaced by flashlights. Mr. Lucas, stop the second guessing of yourself and minimize the political correctness. Just give us the film we remember!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  102. The Emperor's Court by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a online comicthat pokes a little fun at the "Han/Greedo shoots first" argument.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  103. Has to be said... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    "This is not the cut of Star Wars you are looking for."

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  104. 2 things stand out in the article.. by gosand · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. "Universal and United Artists passed on it, but Ladd said yes, famously giving Lucas the merchandising rights that made the filmmaker's fortune."

    And so began down the path to the Dark side.

    2. The shot of Carrie Fisher and her stunt double? Whoa.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:2 things stand out in the article.. by canoe_head · · Score: 1

      2. The shot of Carrie Fisher and her stunt double? Whoa.

      Make that Whoa^2

      I nearly fell of my chair...

    2. Re:2 things stand out in the article.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I sense a great disturbance in the force... in my pants.

  105. What do you call the smartest Star Trek fan? by pentium69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A Star Wars fan.

    --
    Mystika
  106. In the new edition, by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Leia isn't stoned out of her mind...

  107. The Greedo Conspiracy by OSeXy · · Score: 1


    "The cantina shootout between Han Solo and the green-snouted bounty hunter Greedo is virtually identical, but now it seems their guns fire almost simultaneously."

    Yes, but is there any new proof as to the second gunman on the sandy knoll?

  108. Whiny Ani in RoTJ? by dafz1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do we see whiny bitch Ani(Christensen) in the final scene of RoTJ? Wouldn't it make sense to see Ewan as well, for continuity? I would like to say that wouldn't happen, as leaving out Sir Alec would piss off too many fans, but George doesn't seem to care about that with all of his other changes.

    Then again, seeing Sebastian Shaw standing(rumor is Ani loses legs in/after the "great" battle) doesn't make a lot of sense either. Then again, I wouldn't want to see a stumpy Anakin. Maybe he has "magic legs" like Lt. Dan?

  109. George==his own worst critic by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    he's embarrased by the original trilogy. he should just get it over with and release the damn thing.

    If I was a typical moviegoer for the original trilogy, then he's banging his head on the wall for nothing, or actually self destructively.

    I was just mentioning my reaction to Star Wars (EP:IV ANH) yesterday.

    There were these inexplicable commercials on TV about some movie, but I couldn't make heads or tails of them and ignored them along with spots for Palmolive Dishwashing Liquid, Fleismann's Margarine and anything about the upcoming 6 O'clock news. Then a friend calls, with an almost frantic voice, and asks have I seen the new movie something something. No... Go see it! Drop whatever you are doing and go see it!

    Well, you don't get a phone call like that every day (though it may give the MPAA some ideas) I ask and it so happens my Dad, brothers and sister are already planning to go see it, because they've been told this is something really different. Gosh, what can this bee?

    So I'm sitting in the theater with my bucket of popcorn and soda and watch the titles, ready for another thrilling cinematic experience, or at the worst, ninety minutes of nursing my snacks and then immediatley forgetting about what I've seen. It wouldn't be like that. Above the broad curvature of a planet a little spacecraft is coasting along with something like short bursts of phasers hitting it. Then the star destroyer seemingly passes overhead while the sense-surround in the theater rumbles and popcorn I just put in my mouth falls back out into my lap. Wooowwww....

    The rest of the movie passes with chills of excitement and oohs and ahhs, I probably would have won a staring constest as I don't think I blinked once the whole time. I'd be back a few times, others would be back every day or a few showings every day for months.

    When I got home, still late afternoon, I stood in the sun on the driveway with my jaw still slack at what I had seen. Looking up, as if expecting to see a star destroyer cruise over my house. It seemed space fantasy had taken a big step forward and it clearly had a significant impact on millions of others as Star Wars was a massive merchandising success (my sister still has piles and boxes of original stuff, clearly it impacted her more than myself.)

    Video games would suddenly take on certain similarities to Tie Fighters, X-Wings, R2D2 and Darth Vader was the epitome of cool.

    Star Wars rocked the world and gave George Lucas the finances and clout, which have carried him these 27 years, to do a great many things other producer/directors could only dream of.

    It really is pretty awful that he can't be happy with this original artifact and, like some old silver coin with a patina, feels he has to polish it with some course cloth until it's bright, shiny and utterly unattractive to those who appreciate it for what it was.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:George==his own worst critic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > (my sister still has piles and boxes of original stuff, clearly it impacted her more than myself.)

      Name and phone number, please? :-)

    2. Re:George==his own worst critic by StrongBow67 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      From the USA Today article:
      "In the beginning ... it appeared the story was about Luke, but if you see all six films, then you realize the story is really about Darth Vader," Lucas says...

      Funny, seems to me it's all about George Lucas now...
    3. Re:George==his own worst critic by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      then you realize the story is really about Darth Vader," Lucas says...

      Funny, seems to me it's all about George Lucas now...

      If George does go into episodes post VI, it'll be rather hard to be about Darth Vader, unless he comes back as a ghost to council characters...

      I think George makes this stuff up as he goes along.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:George==his own worst critic by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      The rest of the movie passes with chills of excitement and oohs and ahhs, I probably would have won a staring constest as I don't think I blinked once the whole time. I'd be back a few times, others would be back every day or a few showings every day for months.

      I know exactly what you mean, though my memory is fogged somewhat by having only been a half-dozen years old at the time it came out.

      Interestingly, my youngest son seems to have had the same experience with The Fellowship of the Ring. He was only five, but never turned away from the screen, never begged to use the bathroom (over three hours after having consumed a good fraction of a 32oz soda!), even when he got scared by the Nazgul--he was riveted to the screen. That's the kind of film experience you always remember.

      Considering the way EpI affected me and so many others, I really hope Lucas doesn't have Anakin jump over a lava shark.

    5. Re:George==his own worst critic by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Likewise. I went to the cinema and queued up with friends and we had to use "the front seats" down the bottom which were never used since.

      I can still remember that imperial star destroyer on the screen. I spent something like 3 months talking and playing nothing but Star Wars.

      I don't imagine many kids out there are going to have the same feelings about EP1-3. Most of us are only going to see EP3 out of curiousity, not because we loved EP1-2.

    6. Re:George==his own worst critic by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I don't imagine many kids out there are going to have the same feelings about EP1-3. Most of us are only going to see EP3 out of curiousity, not because we loved EP1-2.

      The reality is, once you've been really really impressed, it takes something of a greater magnitude to achieve the same level of awe. That's probably why it was so easy for Lucas to do it in the first place as not much in the genre of Space Fantasy/Sci Fi had that attention given to doing special effects right. (Meanwhile, how many times have you seen a giant orange fireball in movies or TV? Hundreds? Thousands?)

      Lament EP1-3 all you like, but if any one of those films had appeared on the screen back in 1977 and you didn't really know much about what you were going in to see, you'd hold the same admiration and fascination for them that you do EP IV, possibly even more, because the special effects and artistry are still top notch (even if Jar Jar and the gungans kinda spoil it for you)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:George==his own worst critic by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Considering the way EpI affected me and so many others, I really hope Lucas doesn't have Anakin jump over a lava shark.

      If you paid attention to Anakin's whining you'd realize he's expressing fascist ideals -- making people do something or be a certain way. I'm sure young Adolf Hitler expressed a few similar sentiments while serving in WWI.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:George==his own worst critic by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      If you paid attention to Anakin's whining you'd realize he's expressing fascist ideals -- making people do something or be a certain way. I'm sure young Adolf Hitler expressed a few similar sentiments while serving in WWI.

      Apparently Godwin's Law applies equally to Slashdot.

  110. French Version... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Funny

    GREEDO: Is it not a melancholy today, Captain Solo? I morn the fleeting tentrils of night.
    HAN: Well met, Monsuir Greedo. I was just going to eat a fine Brie and drink a bottle of wine with you employer. He wanted to confide his angsts to me.
    GREEDO: Give me your purse of Francs, for lo! I have consumption and the cold hands of the reaper chill me even now. Life is but a cheap wench!
    HAN: Does a man's life ammount to but a purse of gold? Are we ever fated to wander the maze that is life blindly seeking nothing more but piles of shiny metal? I think not!
    GREEDO: Love is capricious and stern. She has taught me to be stoic. I will slay you without remorse, but with a light heart, as in doing so, I will save you all future woe.
    (Han throws his drink on Greedo.)
    HAN: Alas, the laughing mime has failed! I will go now, for, life is but a river traveling forever to the fate we are all blind to. A pox on your taylor!
    (Han exits)

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  111. c) None of the Above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So there are all sorts of stock replies to this sort of event represented here. I'd like to take this chance to present MY first reaction, which I have not seen represented:

    Who Cares? GL with YET ANOTHER set of versions of these movies? How long will people pay attention to this? Because you know he'll keep coming out with new ones. He's already demonstrated that he can't avoid monkeying with it. Lucas is obviously living in the past back when everyone agreed that he was a genius and nobody questioned the quality of Star Wars. Now that he's fucked it all up he won't be able to rest until everyone returns to thinking he's cool.

    Just Stop. It's over. It's over and you've cocked it up. It's time for you to go home now.

  112. This might be old news... by OSeXy · · Score: 1

    But here it is anyway, it details most the changes between original star wars, special edition, and the new 2004 dvd.

    Updates StarWars scene image comparison

    And... ...an interesting trivial tid-bit on the enhancement process to the trilogy.

  113. wesley crusher got Robin Lefler by putch · · Score: 2, Funny
    That is what Star Trek lacks: hunks.
    hey, wesley crusher got Robin Lefler (Ashley Judd).

    i love it when she says "your neutrinos are drifting"

    wow, i can't believe i just admitted being such a loser.
    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  114. What the hell is wrong with people today? by endus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why does everyone feel the need to go and revisit everything and tweak it and make it different? Anyone ever watched the Redux version of apocalypse now? It's not as good....it was one of the greatest movies of all time AS IS so leave it ALONE. The reasons for cutting scenes or doing things a certain way DO NOT MATTER. Are we going to start painting over Picassos because he ran out of green that day and he WOULD have made that part green if he only had the right paint? Who cares??? Art is a culmination of all the factors which go into making it. You made it, you put it out there. It's done. Leave it ALONE.

    I am a Star Wars fan, but not hardcore in any sense of the word. I have never seen the 1997 redone versions, mostly because redoing that movie sounded like the most retarded thing I had ever heard of.

    I didn't even know about the Cantina shootout thing until this post, but it might be one of the gayest moves a filmmaker has ever made. The thing is, it is NOT a "Star Wars Nerd" thing....it's a film thing. If what I have read here is true, that is a MAJOR change to a subtle but important incident in the movie. If people don't understand why that change makes a difference, then they don't understand the movie or the character of Han Solo. It's not about whether the movie agrees with all the times you've reenacted the scene with action figures in your bedroom, it's about a movie that was good because of the story it told and the characters it developed being hacked by a director who used to know what he was doing but has now fallen off into a pit of mediocrity.

    I can't believe the other changes he made either. Fuck continuity...who CARES for chrissakes? Who would complain about the lack of coninuity? No one. Who would complain about fucking up a masterpiece? Apparently quite a few people. Isn't this movie being made for the audience to enjoy? Apparently not because now the artist is rehashing his work, to the displeasure of the fans, on some kind of ego trip that's supposed to make up for the fact that he will NEVER make a movie that good again.

    What is it with people? You go out and make one of the better scifi movies ever made and then shit all over it when it's released to DVD to support continuity with movies that NO ONE thinks are as good as the originals. Dumb Dumb Dumb.

    Sorry, this turned into something closely approximating nerd-rage, but it's about ART...and if it's one thing I hate to see it's artists who sell out and forget what they used to be about.

    1. Re:What the hell is wrong with people today? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      There's 2 revisionist things that I think are cool...

      1. Director's Cut. How the director wanted it to look before some studio guy put it through test screenings and got it ruined.

      2. Restorations (whether physical like cleaning up My Fair Lady or putting in removed scenes like Spartacus.

      I have seen a few special editions which were OK too. The Star Wars ones are not. There's not a single frame added that added anything to the film.

    2. Re:What the hell is wrong with people today? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1
      You go out and make one of the better scifi movies ever made and then shit all over it when it's released to DVD to support continuity with movies that NO ONE thinks are as good as the originals.


      I think that really hits the nail on the head for me. I think no matter what, I would have certain discomfort with making subtle changes to the movie for something like continuity with the old one. But I bet I wouldn't mind nearly as much, if not for the fact that the prequel trilogy is such a piece of shit that it has no right being patched into movies that are actually good. Thanks to his acting in Episode II, I cringe every time I see any shots from Star Wars that involve Hayden Christiensen, and the last thing I want is to think about his whiny ass standing next to ghost Yoda and ghost Obi-Wan. Also, doesn't the new ghost Annikin look like an Old Navy model? He seems really out of place.
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  115. Lucas' dedication to realism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I don't understand why there is any controversy at all. Lucas is merely reflecting the reality of a little thing we like to call revisionist history!

  116. Star Wars : Still Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edit it again and again, Star Wars is still bad...

    Can Lucas come up with some new ideas instead of beating this dead horse?

  117. Alternative.... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Don't get me started on Guido shooting first, that completely changed Han's daring go-for-it attitude as a lawless smuggler out only for himself. Having them shoot at the same time I can accept logically. Han decides to shoot, Guido sees it in his eyes and shoots as well. Of course, Guido missing makes little sense at 3 feet, but if he had hit him it would have been a pretty short movie.

    Well, what George could have done was have Greedo fire first, and then have "Captian Binks" waiting in the wing to inherit the ship and continue the journey - so I guess it could have been worse!

    Really though I'm in agreement with you, I dislike Greedo shooting at all but I find it a lot better that they would at least shoot at the same time (though like you say having Greedo miss makes little sense).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  118. Lowry Digital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might be surprized to know that the restoration was done with a renderfarm of 600 Apple G5's.

    http://www.apple.com/pro/film/lowry/index2.html

  119. Better Jabba in ANH by Merle+Corey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looking at the screenshots at Digital Bits, at least Jabba doesn't look like the Golgothan any more.

    Ok, ok, in all fairness, the Golgothan looks better than Jabba '97.

  120. Yahh!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I was OK with most of the changes (especially the new Jabba looks about 1000x better).

    But I found the changes to Jedi, at the end, very very disturbing!! That just feels wrong, to reinsert anakin there.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  121. Hey, it almost works this time by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    I'm having a little trouble figuring out how to respond to the "left" of your post, but...

    and gives some justification for Lucas issuing the updated versions of the trilogy

    Let me guess...

    1. To bring the films more in line with his "original" artistic vision.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  122. Star Wars movies actually suck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... well, they do... overrated kiddie holywood, pretending to be serious and "deep".

    I wonder how many years or generations will take to get beyond the original hype and see them for what they are: pretty childish, weak, black-and-white Evil-Good story, with fast aging, soon rendered to be ridiculous visual effects.

    If the stars could laugh...

  123. I'M NOT GONNA BUY REVISIONIST HISTORY!!!! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Speaking as a die-hard Star Wars fan from Episode III (1977), there is no way in hell I'm going to buy this travesty! The message needs to be sent loud and clear that NO ONE wants to see these epic masterpieces in altered form! The most obvious problem with these is that they just show how unplanned Lucas was when he conceived of the entire franchise in the 70s. Now he has to go back in and make changes to try and make all the films seem cohesive. What a lamer!!!!

    Then there is all that bullshit with Yoda flying around like a greased up pig. For one thing Yoda was OLD!!! So there is no way he could fight that fast because when you're old you move slow! And that little old prune is WICKED old!!!! I mean like 900+ years old!! So there isn't any way that the known laws of physics would allow for a being that old to fly around and fight like that It's just not within the realm of possibility.

    Now we also have the whole Backdoor Boys issue in the Phantom Menace. Why they picked one of them to play the teen-aged Anakin is beyond me. For one thing, he can't act (like he couldn't even sing when he had that beard in the Backstreet Boys). The other thing is that they stuck him in the altered version of Return of the Jedi. This completely flies in the face of the known law that has-been vocalists from teeny-bopper bands can't make more than one flop movie. And again, they used CGI to try and get around this. If there is one thing that I personally can't stand, it's when people use CGI to try and change history! Lucas should be hung for that crime.

    Now, I don't know this for a fact, but I have it on good authority that the wrist watch in Episode III has been removed also using CGI. To this I have to ask W H Y ????! Is it really that intrinsic to the plot? Oh sure, I know a bunch of you are going to jump down my throat and say that the very fact that the watch is in there disrupts the suspension of disbelief and therefore ruins the movie. To that I say... It's ONLY a movie, don't take it so seriously!!! Besides, I prefer my reality to be unedited with warts and all. Lucas is screwing with reality and history. Someone needs to tell that guy that he isn't god or something!!! So in conclusion I'm saying that I won't be buying this box set and that you shouldn't either. In fact no one should. Make sure to tell all of your neighbors, friends, co-workers and trysting partners not to buy these discs. After all, when the market speaks, Lucas will surely reconsider and release the original versions of the movies. WORST MOVIE BOX SET RELEASE EVAR!!!!

    1. Re:I'M NOT GONNA BUY REVISIONIST HISTORY!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A die hard fan, and you can't even tell the difference between Episode IV and III?

  124. Re:Holding your breath... tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your geek use of unfscked is not only unfunny and is reflective of your fat, sexless loser ass philandering child molester self, but also incorrect. Fuck you and your fucking fsck, Fucker. In this case the use of fsck is WRONG, because the Original Star Wars from Geroge Fuck-face Lucas the child molester (Graffiti, Star Wars and ESB are the only good films of his, the rest sucks and I want to get a pony to bite his penis off), the original is the uncorrupted file-system and therefore FSCK would do NOTHING to fix is, since it was unmounted cleanly. The new versions need the FSCK. FUCK YOU you fat Nuevo hippy geek sexless faggot fucker. Geek means no sex. Fuck you fag.

  125. plain and simple reason why Lucas is doing this: by CheechBG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Richard Marquand and Irvin Kirshner. They directed VI and V, respectively. I honestly think that Lucas is trying to make the entire trilogy patently his and by doing so is forced to "rewrite" history. Granted, yes, the first was directed by him, but I firmly believe that the first installment was the roughest out of the 3.

    Richard Marquand must be spinning in his grave.

  126. Time -1, Flamebait by dswensen · · Score: 1
    So, did anyone else notice that the Time article is mostly just flamebait taking cheap shots at Star Wars fans?

    Be warned: this is not your dweeby uncle's or your inner child's Star Wars.

    "Your inner child can suck it!"

    Not the trilogy that opened in 1977, 1980 and 1983, but the newer improved special editions of 1997, the ones with some new footage and updated computer effects.

    They didn't do their homework; hell, it's not even the editions that opened in 1997!

    Says Jim Ward, president of LucasArts: "Those are the versions of the film [George] had always envisioned. It's really an artist's prerogative."

    ...says Jim Ward, Lucasfilm's official middle finger.

    In the documentary Lucas speaks of perfecting "things that I had to give up on because I just didn't have the time or money or the power."

    So George always intended to have Greedo shoot first, but just couldn't get it together because of budgetary limitations. Sure, I'll buy that. I guess he also made Ewoks because he could only afford half-size Wookiee suits.

    This kind of coherence begets controversy among the caretakers of movie tradition.

    Wait, I thought we were just everybody's dweeby uncle a paragraph or two ago.

    For them, New is never Improved, and Lucas' decision to release the updated films without the cherished originals is sacrilege.

    Please. New can be Improved, if it's done for the sake of improvement, not PC cowardice and revisionism. And why are these Capitalized? Why did Time Hire this Guy?

    That's some poorly written material.

    1. Re:Time -1, Flamebait by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      That's some poorly written material.

      The photo of Carrie Fisher + stunt double sunbathing in matching metal bikinis more than makes up for that though, wouldn't you say?

  127. Why DVD Burners were invented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man... can't believe that these are "extra special" editions of the original movies... can't Lucas stop tinkering... I think that I might just rip the whole thing chapter-by-chapter to my computer and then burn a proper version with the original scenes restored (from my best quality VHS tape) and the extra scenes that suck removed. Oh well... Mine's on pre-order so it's not like Lucas will notice my displeasure in his wallet.

  128. Wonder what? by TuringTest · · Score: 1

    The lightsabers will be replaced with pogo sticks!

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  129. remake mix mistakes by circusboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I for one will be happy with the new version of the shootout if george will only go back and fix the mix in "empire strikes back"

    for those of you who might not have noticed, in the re-release on VHS, all of Han Solo's sarcastic one off remarks in the asteroid field have been mixed out. these few quick remarks were some of the biggest things that humanized that character.

    among all the changes made in the original trilogy, this was the biggest mistake. as far as the others go I was thrilled to see the alteration of the ending of Jedi, which I generally considered the weakest of the three. (not actually for the ewoks mind you, but the overdoing of the "sensitive moments.")

    side note, has anyone else ever noticed that the cinematographer from empire also has the rocky horror on his resume?http://imdb.com/name/nm0005893/

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  130. Well, I'll be damned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with faint praise.

  131. The SPECIAL Special Edition! by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, they are the SEs with even more differences (Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!).

    ...using walkie-talkies!

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:The SPECIAL Special Edition! by dcam · · Score: 1

      I favour semaphore.

      --
      meh
  132. Gredo and Han switcheroo by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!)

    Also, Lucas digitally changed the scene so that Han misses and Gredo kills Han instead. Later, Gredo assasinates Jabba the Hutt and takes over his crime ring, and falls in love with Princess Leia and tehy get married and have a child who turns out to be Tiger Woods.

  133. So, George, is FOUR enough? by feloneous+cat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Initial release.
    2. Videotape (dropped a scene - which I can't freakin' remember NOW)
    3. Added some scenes (with some really BADLY done CG at times)
    4. YET another Edit...

    Hell, Thomas Dolby is about the only artist I can think of who has re-worked the same material only to come up with essentially the same thing.

    And the first one STILL is better...

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
  134. and not only that... by Savatte · · Score: 2, Funny

    George Lucas announced that C3PO is a replicant!

  135. AND SO THIS IS WHAT P2P IS FOR by neuraloverload · · Score: 1

    artistic integrity of original work. i suggest bit torrent for the pre-se laser disc versions floating around out there. after all the movie i fell in love with is not the middle aged horror we all got in the end.

  136. No thanks. by no_such_user · · Score: 1

    Support the little guy and get free shipping to boot.

    http://www.deepdiscountdvd.com/dvd.cfm?itemID=FX D0 22341

    (No, I get nothing for referring these guys, except hopefully continued low prices on all other DVDs I buy from them).

  137. Hmm.. by ilumits · · Score: 1


    I wonder if they left in the scene where a Storm Trooper bumps his head while going through a door...

    1. Re:Hmm.. by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I hope they did. I couldn't believe it when that scene survived into the Special Edition. God, I love that part...

  138. So what? by sharkey · · Score: 1
    Now Gredo and Han shoot at the SAME time!

    Who the hell is Gredo?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:So what? by mink · · Score: 1

      Well, Greedo, he's just this guy, you know?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  139. After reading that article I just have one request by d_jedi · · Score: 1

    MORE photos of Leia in the metal bikini!!

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  140. Did he fix Darth Vader's Hand-waving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all this time has he fixed the bad dubbing with Darth Vader's ANH hand waving in the one-on-one scene on the Death Star with Tarkin? This seemed to be fixed briefly for the TV release years ago but not since.

  141. Don't worry about it... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    It all got sorted out in court

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  142. Mostly cosmetic changes by inkswamp · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As if anything could stop all the whining at this point, the article states that most of the changes are minor and cosmetic in nature. And this:

    Overall, the expected changes on the DVDs aren't as dramatic as those for the Special Editions in 1997, says Scott Chitwood, one of the co-founders of TheForce.Net, a Star Wars fan/news site. "I think a few of the changes will only make sense after Episode III," he says.

    Hopefully this is true, but not because I'm one of those purist Star Wars fans, but rather I'd love to hear an end to the incessant whining sound coming from some of you.

    BTW, I think Hayden Christensen at the end of Jedi makes a ton of sense and is an excellent decision on the part of Lucas. It will really wrap up the continuity of the entire series of films in a simple and effective way.

    Disagree with me? Probably. Do I care? Probably not.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  143. Shooting at the same time by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always been in favor of Han shooting first, but I can live with simultaneous shooting. It always bothered me that Greedo was like a James-Bond-movie-villain: too much talking before killing the guy he was after ended up in his own demise. Simultaneous shots makes Greedo seem more like a serious bounty hunter who just gets beat because Han is better.

    1. Re:Shooting at the same time by ElChinoRecoba · · Score: 1

      There's still the disturbing contradiction that the only bounty hunter that is good enough to find Han on some desert rock in the middle of nowhere is also the guy that can't hit a person sitting down two feet away from him. He must have had one of those stormtrooper blasters.

  144. Meanwhile, some of the changes are GOOD! by inkswamp · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Instead of complaining about the few things that Lucas changes that apparently ruined your childhood, why not check out some of the subtle things Lucas cleaned up or altered that will be a massive improvement over the original releases?

    Bear in mind, people, that directors (even Lucas) get pressure to alter their films, change things, remove things, cut corners, etc. At least give Lucas's new versions a chance before denouncing them outright. It appears to me that lots of things have been changed just to improve what he originally intended and only a few changes to tweak the films to make them line up with the prequels. I see lots worth being excited about, little worth whining about.

    I'm especially thrilled that they took the time to color correct the damn Rancor scene in Jedi. It never looked right that Luke's shading was a noticeable lighter value than the Rancor's. It looked like an actor moving around in front of a movie screen. Judging from the stills on the site above, it looks perfect.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Meanwhile, some of the changes are GOOD! by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I don't think most people here would have a problem with some restoration work or enhancing colour or sound a little.

      There's no rules, except - whatever you do, try and improve it. I haven't met anyone who thought the extra SE bits were worthwhile (although many thought the sound was a big improvement.

  145. Man I am SO ragingly pissed right about now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Episode IV: A New Hope. Only subtle changes here. The cantina shootout between Han Solo and the green-snouted bounty hunter Greedo is virtually identical, but now it seems their guns fire almost simultaneously. Lucas had changed the original for the 1997 rerelease because it seemed that Han had fired first. Seemed? SEEMED?!? Seemed my ass!!! Han shot first, period.

    FUCK YOU LUCAS, FUCK YOU!!! You son of a bitch...why can't you just give us the original unmodified version along with the "director's (in this case moron's) cut" with all the SE crap and nonsense. Most of the SE stuff is fine...but GOD DAMN IT HAN SHOT FIRST!!! QUIT TWEAKING WITH THAT; IT'S PART OF HIS CHARACTER!!! Damn you to hell, Lucas, you bastard...

  146. Why Spend Money on an Edit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I really don't understand is why LucasFilms bothered to spend money on edits and new content. I might be way off-base, but I think the re-released movies would have sold as well (better?) if they had just released the originals.

    Surely no one bought the movies for the changes?

  147. Oh nooooooo! by teknurd · · Score: 1

    All I have to say is

    GET A LIFE PEOPLE!

    It's just a movie.

    --

    The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!
  148. Lucas killed it. Now you losers hump the corpse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a life, people. Really. Star Wars in its day was something. Empire was very something. But from there it was all down hill, and Lucas killed the franchise decisively with his prequels. It's dead, and know what, the original Star Wars is pretty lame by today's standards. NO amount of re-editing will change that. If you've got Empire on VHS, you have all you'll ever need. But really you losers, it is time to get on with your lives.

  149. Re:Holding your breath... tsarkon reports by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    I usually don't respond to AC's, but I really had to thank you for the best laugh I had all day! That was a pretty funny raving troll; indeed probably one of the best I've ever had the honor of receiving.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  150. Do yourself a favor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to amazon.com and buy the babylon 5 series instead...thank me later

  151. DVD Screen Captures by diver8 · · Score: 1

    Here are a ton of screen caps from the DVDs, including the bonus disc.

    http://www.munk.nildram.co.uk/jimstarwars/
    --
    Check my journal for gmail invites!
  152. PLEASE MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sort of offtopic, but lots of Star Wars fans will probably want to watch Lucas on Charlie Rose tonight on PBS.

    http://charlierose.com/index.shtm

    Just trying to give a heads up without KWing.

    1. Re:PLEASE MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what does PBS have to do with an EU fighter/bomber for the New Republic?

  153. Leonardo Da Vinci and George Lucas by ansible · · Score: 1

    Everyone would have thought it ridiculous if Picasso took some of his earlier work back, and touched it up to make it more realistic, or in fashion. I think the same way about the Star Wars Films.

    Leonardo Da Vinci was known for going back to his previous works, studying them for a while, and sometimes making changes. I guess he just wasn't satisfied either.

    I still don't see the need for Greedo shooting first, however...

    I would prefer that Lucas use modern tech to clean up visuals, and leave it at that. There is some argument to allowing back in deleted scenes which were cut because the studio thought the run time was too long. But that should be about it. Just leave it as it was, warts and all.

    Lucas needs to realize that making mistakes is a part of life. And trying to re-write history doesn't mean those mistakes were never made.

    Most directors aren't worried about fixing their previous movies. They are usually worried about making their next one better.

    So what's going to happen with the Indiana Jones series in a few years?

  154. yes they are widescreen by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    I have all three at home, and love them, they are indeed widescreen... a little soft in sharpness I suppose, but still fantastic to watch and listen to. They will indeed tide me over until I'm sure George decides he can make lots of money releasing the originals as some 'archive edition' or similar.

  155. No, you've got it all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the Canteen Veterans for Truth, Han really only shot a teenaged Ewok in the back.

  156. Stop George by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lucas keeps rereleasing this crap because you losers keep buying it. So stop! Stop buying it. Stop seeing his movies. How did a class-act like "Starship Troopers" bomb in the US yet that crap "Phantom Menace" made zillions. So stop. Please stop. And stop calling him 'George'. You think he's your buddy? He doesn't know your name. All he wants is that green shit in your wallet.


    A planet full where the guys are still jerking off over Star Wars and the women wear those fat ass Hipster jeans. (Which explains a lot about the guys actually)


    Sigh. Where's the (Original) Death Star when you need it?

    1. Re:Stop George by mink · · Score: 1

      Starship troopers a "classs act"? Shit. If I had mod points I'd set you to funny.

      Please enlighten me as to how it qualifies.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  157. Carrie and the ewoks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the new ending rocks, I NEVER tolerated the ending with the ewoks chanting that sissy song!
    The rest I would leave as it was in the originals, although I wouldnt reject the hans solo-jabba the hut chat either.
    I will buy it anyway, but If George ever digitally covers up Carrie for decency's sake...then I'd really consider suing Lucasfilms! ;)

  158. year 2010 ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucasfilm.com announces hourly updates to its on line 3-D HDTV nine movies that comprise the Star Wars Saga. Avatars that look and act like the viewer (using standard Avatar cookies) now incorporate data from the users context-links cookie sites every hour so your character interacts in the drama according to the most recent data relevent to you.

    "In the beginning ... it appeared the story was about Luke, but if you see all nine films, then you realize the story is really about you - in whichever role you have chosen for your avatar to play," Lucas says.

    There's also a collection of trailers, toys, commercials, posters and rare production photos. "It is a way of having a piece of the Lucasfilm archive," says the executive producer of the on line collection. "But it's also a way for fans who think they know everything to become inspired, surprised and amazed on a continual basis."

  159. The biggest cut.... by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    .. is one of the doorways. They enlarged it so that the stormtrooper no longer bangs his head on it....

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  160. If George Lucas want to fix SWT, do it right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, there are at least 187 errors in the movie. That means we're going to see yet another Star Wars Trilogy update by GL in near future, if he is still alive by then.

  161. Re:Holding your breath... tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen, you smashed body of a wretched animal. I suspect it wasn't meant as a compliment.

    Furthermore, your grandstanding assertion that this is "one of the best [you]'ve ever had the honor of receiving" indicates to anyone with the barest grasp of Collaborative Discussion Theory that you've never uttered a word of substance. To anyone. I submit to you that any well-worded assertion predicated upon original and rational thought will raise howls of protest from the Mothers Against Drug Driving (rehash of the failed and immoral "temperance movement" (i.e., the recurring meme that encourages the insulting and unbiblical (cf. Genesis 1:29: "God said, 'Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed, which is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree, which bears fruit yielding seed. It will be your food. To every animal of the earth, and to every bird of the sky, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food;' and it was so.") suppression of the consumption of plants given to us by God for our sustenance and pleasure)), Million Mom March (attempt to subvert the respect for motherhood by associating the delusional wailings of those who cannot mentally separate a tool from its wielder with an unconstitutional effort to destroy our inalienable, individual ("A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves ... and include all men capable of bearing arms." --Richard Henry Lee, Senator, First Congress, Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer (1788)) right to defend ourselves against both foreign invaders and corrupt tyrants and usurpers (note that Diane Feinstein has a concealed carry permit but she doesn't want the hoi polloi, the proles, WE THE PEOPLE OF THESE UNITED STATES to be on an equal footing with her; why's she afraid of the well-regulated militia if she truly preserves and protects the Constitution?)), military-industrial-pharmaceutical-complex worshipping toadies.

    We're a generation of men raised by women. I'm wondering if another woman is really the answer we need.

    Note the blatant censorship by Skull & Bones, Bush & Kerry, Kang & Kodos, yin & yang, there is no hope, your vote is a joke, the republic is dead, of "Chapter 5: The Right to Bear Arms" (compare Chapter 4 and Chapter 6)!

    I weep for the future if you think a random blast of vulgarity is a "raving troll". Patriots question the "Patriot" act and Ashcroft says they aid terrorists, Maddox opens his mouth and censorship is attempted. We live in the age of feelies and soma and a lack of Quality (Pirsig) and you are amused by self-referential parody of the hopelessness of the age? You appendage of Cthulhu. Go back to your lair; we are not ready for you yet!

    Your inner thoughts as you posted your ill-advised diatribe:

    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  162. Re:Holding your breath... tsarkon reports by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 0, Troll

    Indeed it was meant as a compliment. I laughed out loud reading it the first time around and still chuckled while reading it to reply. With this one though, and this is just meant to be honest critiziscm, you seem to have overreached a bit. The biblical reference is good, but you have to remember that amongst those "every herb yielding seed, which is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree, which bears fruit yielding seed[,]" are herbs and such that are poisonous. Therefore it was not God's intention that we consume all of them. The Constitutional arguments could also use further refienment. Argument by anecdote can be emotionally grasping, but it really fails as a means of logical persuasion. Finally, as for Chulhu, I haven't yet read any Lovecraft, but would be interested in any recommendations you may have.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?