Slashdot Mirror


Dear Microsoft Windows ...

SpaceCanary writes "I recently read this open letter to Windows and I think it's pretty funny. The guy writes a letter to his OS as if he was breaking up with it. It's a bit strange, but finally more people are starting to see the light and moving away from Windows. The writer chronicles his relationship with the versions of Windows and finally is able to move on in the end."

617 comments

  1. Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear Internet,

    I wish you weren't filled with self-righteous idiots who can only express themselves in manifestos, open letters, and rants. I wish people knew how to write meaningful criticism instead of half-hearted sarcasm.

    Sincerely,
    John Q. Irony

    1. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm TrackBacking my blog to this post. Anyone have a Permalink?

    2. Re:Dear Internet, by das_katz_socrates · · Score: 0

      I agree with all the self rightous out of the way the pornographers would have it all to themselves.

      --
      This sig has no nutritional value...
    3. Re:Dear Internet, by mabu · · Score: 4, Funny


      Dear John Q. Irony

      We understand how important it is for people to feel someone listens when they offer comments and suggestions. As a result, we've developed this automated attendant to help process your inquiry.

      Thank you very much for your letter. Your letter is important to us. But first please check our knowledge base, F.A.Q., and unofficial message forums. If this fails, fill out the 3-page customer service ticket at http://internet.com/cust/level1/sectionA/form1a.cf m

      If this fails, you can speak to a customer service representative but please make sure to do so during standard business hours in the country of Pakistan, and have Java, ActiveX, Flash, Quicktime and the latest version of IE before you visit the user support area.

      Thank you. We do care.

      - Internet Inc.

    4. Re:Dear Internet, by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1, Troll

      uhoh....we have a Microsoft saint.

      ive never really understood how anyone could honestly support the biggest monopoly in existence. at least I assume he does, thats what was implied.

      (sigh) some people are so blinded...i bet hes even still using Internet Explorer...pardon my French.

      --
      "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
    5. Re:Dear Internet, by Txiasaeia · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'm using Windows XP by choice. Monopoly or not, Microsoft knows how to build a solid OS. I've used various distros of Linux and it's okay, but I keep on coming back to Microsoft because it's simply easy to use, looks good, and doesn't take too long to load up. That and games ;) Just thought you'd like to know that some of us use Windows XP by choice and not by default.

      Now internet explorer, on the other hand, I wouldn't touch with a 10 pica pole. I switched to Opera a few years ago and have been *much* happier.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    6. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you're great, you almost got me for a moment! I thought you were serious about using XP on purpose...

    7. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original poster was griping about the quality of criticism on the Internet. You, naturally, take that to mean he is a "Microsoft saint."

      Perhaps you'd like to read some self-righteous whining on other topics, like Linux and the unusable software written for it.

    8. Re:Dear Internet, by Txiasaeia · · Score: 5, Informative

      Huh? Of course I'm serious about using XP on purpose. I'm not quite sure why I was modded flamebait, but I don't need a lot of intensive programs, and I prefer microsoft alternatives (MS office vs openoffice, windows vs linux, etc.) I'm not interested in building my OS from scratch, and I just feel like Windows XP is a more finished product than Linux (specifically, Mandrake & Red Hat). My computer isn't my hobby, it's my entertainment, and seriously, I've had zero to no problems with Windows XP.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    9. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "'m not quite sure why I was modded flamebait"...

      This IS Slashdot, you know ;)

    10. Re:Dear Internet, by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Funny

      I understand that our dear community here is linux-centric, but I would think that people would be more interested in quality than the economics surrounding a specific software package. You're all Marxists, Marxists I say! ;)

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    11. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nah.... they just want to make sure you have choice... just as long as you choose what they want you to choose. Otherwise, you get bad points.

      The /. community as a whole is the biggest hypocritical bunch of folks that I've ever seen.

    12. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. take a group of people
      2. watch the loudest
      3. stir
      4. take the loudests' words and attach them to the result.
      5. bon appetit

    13. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Q. Irony

      I love you, I do.

    14. Re:Dear Internet, by IAR80 · · Score: 1

      If I had moderator points (whitch I don't) I would have moderate this as funny.

      --
      http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    15. Re:Dear Internet, by IAR80 · · Score: 2, Funny

      God damn comunist bastards! Bolshevics! In Soviet Russia Linux watches you!

      --
      http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    16. Re:Dear Internet, by kriebz · · Score: 0, Troll

      I almost modded you troll, actually, but reading down, you seem honest. I personally don't see how you call windows XP easy to use, and XP just looks ugly, not polished.

    17. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft users, your software is not stable, use our open source idealistware it is far,far,far more stable and YOU will live happily ever after .......

      Warning: Unknown(/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in Unknown on line 0

      Warning: (null)(): Failed opening '/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in Unknown on line 0

      ps I think you need get the latest PHP.NET service pack

    18. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like he would understand. He has a sig. of one of his own quotes for godsakes!

    19. Re:Dear Internet, by AJWM · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Monopoly or not, Microsoft knows how to build a solid OS.

      Dang, and me without points to mod this up (+1, Funny).

      --
      -- Alastair
    20. Re:Dear Internet, by airConditionedGypsy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My computer isn't my hobby, it's my entertainment, and seriously, I've had zero to no problems with Windows XP.

      Really? Hmmm. I've got a JPEG you'd probably like to see.

      On the serious side, if it works for you, that's cool. There is a bit of a curve to switching, but it is no greater than the curve that someone has to climb when encountering a Windows-based OS for the first time.

      FOSS is all about choice. If you choose to use what many in this crowd (including me) believe to be an inferior operating system, then you should be free to do so. But time will tell which is more "polished."

      --
      I bootleg Fizzy Lifting Drinks.
    21. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. ???
      7. PROFIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

    22. Re:Dear Internet, by drjzzz · · Score: 1
      Windows XP is a more finished product than Linux (specifically, Mandrake & Red Hat)

      You should try Fedora. At work, I use with a recent Dell with XP pro maintained by a IT staff. At home, I use a $400 eMachines with Fedora Core 2, Open Office etc installed and maintained by me, no sweat. This linux distro opens CDs, DVDs, and USB memory sticks without fiddling. The XPP at work crashes with the same memory stick (I have to reboot to copy files). Linux is snappier on the Celeron than XPP is on the P4. I had no complaints with RedHat but switched to Fedora to keep updated.

      Obligatory: YMMV-BIWAS (but it's worth a shot)

      --
      to err is human, to forgive is divine, to forget is... umm...
    23. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Solid" is a relative term.

      Linux looks better, takes less time to install and boot (depending upon your definition of "load up"... spoken like a true user btw) and sure, when 90% of the world is using it that's what game manufacturers are going to target as their platform.

      To sum up, your favorite OS is idiot proof... I suggest you stick with it for that very reason.

    24. Re:Dear Internet, by vsprintf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Monopoly or not, Microsoft knows how to build a solid OS.

      You mean solid as in very big and thick as a brick? Or do you mean solid as in being an immovable, easy target for malware? As a former user, Windows doesn't fit my definition of a "solid OS". A solid OS isn't swiss cheese that requires virus scanners, anti-spyware tools, and anti-adware tools that suck up system resources while watching for bad things that the OS allows. Microsoft definitely knows how to market their software, which is a very different thing from building a solid product.

    25. Re:Dear Internet, by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I have modded it a tiny bit - I'm using YzDock, a now-defunct Apple-clone application bar, a tool that gets rid of the bar at the bottom, rainlendar, and style xp. When I'm not running anything all that's on the desktop is my wallpaper, the app bar, and rainlendar. It's extremely minimal and quite aesthetically beautiful, IMHO. The start menu is slimmed down to the bare necessitites, the colours are muted (I'm using a greyscale background right now - a b&w photo of a bunch of pumpkins, fitting in with the fall season), and msot of the default icons have been squashed. It's definitely not stock (but still extremely easy to do) ;)

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    26. Re:Dear Internet, by ecko3437 · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's about it too, eh?

      Though ASP.NET errors aren't better, but at least they dont display the path to whatever's wrong.

      I'd also like to state I use Windows by choice. I OWN a linux box and I have apache and an IRCd set up on there, yet I still prefer my Windows machine.

      I hate hearing about how unsecure Windows is. I ran my computer in an experiment for two months with no AV or Firewall protection. I installed an AV software and scanned. Guess what? No viruses, none of those dreaded worms you apparently get after signing on to the 'net for more than fifteen minutes. Maybe it was a fluke, but I still love my Windows machine.

      It's my (possibly uneducated) opinion that Linux lacks one major thing that prevents it from gaining more of a user base: Installers. Yes, I realize that a lot of you like your stuff open source, but would a regular user want to compile everything they download? Of course not. I'm waiting for a trend of sepereate source releases along with decent installers (I know RPMs exist, but a lot of software I've downloaded and used on my linux box is just source) and configuration utilities. One of the things that makes me mad is when I have to manually edit the .conf files for my IRCd. A UI to a config util would certainly edge me closer to the switch.

      My two cents

      --
      -Eric Smith
    27. Re:Dear Internet, by kjamez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i use xp by choice as well ... behind a solid [linux] firewall, an xp box is just as safe an secure as any other. use ssh [putty?]. use pine [thunderbird?], whatever: just not outlook. i use it for the applications (flash, 3d studio max, vegas, etc, etc) ... that all have working linux alternatives, mind you, but i still like having the macromedia vesion of flash mx, yano?
      the linux box dhcp's the modem on eth0 and routes to eth1 : i have a linksys router which forwards port 21 and 22 only for me, to a linux box. the box does samba shares, ftp, etc, etc ... for my local network. nothing really get's past it. i use windows for work primarily but i do so knowing that it is safely behind the my firewall, and never ever reads email (locally) ... but i would never ever ever do what comcast/adelphia/etc says is the only way they will offer you any tech support: with the modem directly connected to the computer [xp].

      i'm sure a lot of you do the same ...

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    28. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory: YMMV-BIWAS (but it's worth a shot)

      He's already using WinXP, he probably doesn't need another activation code. Besides, I think you forgot to include part of the code.

    29. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word has a killer spell checker, too!

    30. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

      Be enlightened:

      http://www.apple.com

    31. Re:Dear Internet, by QuantumG · · Score: 1, Insightful
      FOSS is all about choice.

      I wish people would stop saying this. Free Software is about freedom. Open Source Software is about a better method of software production (or something). FOSS = Free and Open Source Source, so there's absolutely nothing sensible you can say about it. It's like saying something sensible about "Intellectual Property", you can't. If we only had one piece of Free Software to choose from we'd still have the freedom to do what we want with it.. that's what Free Software is about. If you want "choice", go use shareware, they've got all the choice you'll ever want.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    32. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, you should consider starting a series called "Queer Eye for the Desktop".

    33. Re:Dear Internet, by Demanche · · Score: 1

      You have a good point here, something most people don't quite catch on to is that open source inside of windows is almost stronger then open source in linux

      FireFox has had 2 million downloads.. how many of those do you think are running on linux? ;)

      Im not bashing linux - but open source is all over - windows haters need to open up - some of those firefox users might learn about open source through closed source :>

      --
      Mod me down im a newf (wiki)
    34. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FOSS is also about choice of what programs to use.

    35. Re:Dear Internet, by Don+Negro · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree with you about IE, but if you're dislike of it is so weak that you only maintain a one-and-two-thirds inch distance from it, I'm surprised you bothered to post about it at all.

      --

      Don Negro
      Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

    36. Re:Dear Internet, by C0rinthian · · Score: 1
      I hate hearing about how unsecure Windows is. I ran my computer in an experiment for two months with no AV or Firewall protection. I installed an AV software and scanned. Guess what? No viruses, none of those dreaded worms you apparently get after signing on to the 'net for more than fifteen minutes. Maybe it was a fluke, but I still love my Windows machine.
      What kind of connection was it? Many DSL modems have built in firewalls. There are more variables here besides installed software that you didn't mention. More than likely, you were not getting an external IP, and therefore not succeptible to a majority of the blaster/sasser/etc type worms.

      Had you been on dial-up, I assure you your experience would have been far less pleasant.
    37. Re:Dear Internet, by omicronish · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat, although I do think that it takes an above-average level of computer competency to run Windows XP without spyware problems. Then again, I've always had hardware problems under Linux, so it seems like you need to excel at computers regardless of the OS you're using if you want it to be stable. Or maybe run Mac OS X (I don't know, I haven't tried it).

      But yeah, I play games, do .NET coding, surf the Internet, and do school stuff all on Windows. What's nice is that a lot of what seems like Unix-exclusive software also runs on Windows. There's ActivePython, MiKTeX, a large collection of command-line Unix utilities, including wget, and even games such as FreeCiv. Other people might have different needs that necessitate Linux, but Windows runs fine for me.

      With that said, Txiasaeia, you might want to try Gentoo for something different in the Linux world. Installation takes a while since it's a very manual process, but the entire distribution makes me feel "cleaner" when I use it (yes, I still take showers). Mandrake feels like absolute bloat to me, but I fell in love with Gentoo once I tried it.

    38. Re:Dear Internet, by platipusrc · · Score: 1

      He didn't say that it was turned on during the two month period!

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
    39. Re:Dear Internet, by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Dang, and me without points to mod this up (+1, Funny)."

      For you Windows users out there who don't understand why this is funny, to us it's sort of like saying "Linux is ready for the desktop!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    40. Re:Dear Internet, by Rallion · · Score: 1

      FOSS is all about choice.

      Some people don't want choice. I don't mean they have no preference between choice and no choice, I mean that they prefer no choice. For me and many others (though I personally use XP) there is actually some enjoyment to be found comparing alternatives, weighing pros and cons, reading articles to, to pick the obvious example, decide which Linux distro is best for a situation. Most people HATE that. If there has to be a bunch of options, then there had damn well better be a default option, or they're going to give up on it immediately.

      Just wanted to point out that the choice is sometimes just one more way to destroy usability from the average person's perspective.

    41. Re:Dear Internet, by ecko3437 · · Score: 0

      1) It was turned on. Was almost always on. 2) Cable - 3Mbps off of Charter Pipeline. Also, here's my IP if you care to take your shot at remote formatting it: 127.0.0.1 Good luck. -Eric

      --
      -Eric Smith
    42. Re:Dear Internet, by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 3, Funny
      Y'know, with a few edits, your sentence could sound like it came from Zippy the Pinhead:

      YOW! I'm TrackBacking my blog to this post from my Barcalounger. Anyone have a Permalink?

    43. Re:Dear Internet, by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      127.0.0.1 is the loopback ip to your NIC. That is absolutely meaningless to anything outside your computer, including your cablemodem. Thats not even a valid internal network IP.

    44. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually thier not marxists at all, its about FREEDOM not FREE stuff. Dont think of linux and GPL as a marxist revolution, think of it as the American revolution. The shot heard round the world for technology. It took me a while to "get it" but freedom software isnt anti-capitalist. Its about the users right to modify the code and make it better. Dont sell me a black box thats locked. I want a clear box and a bucket of parts and a schematic. Open source is democratic, everyone gets access. Compare closed governments to open governments and you can see how open source is really democratic not communist (closed).

    45. Re:Dear Internet, by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      Someone deleted the index file!

      Warning: Unknown(/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in Unknown on line 0

      Warning: (null)(): Failed opening '/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in Unknown on line 0

    46. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      FireFox has had 2 million downloads.. how many of those do you think are running on linux? ;)
      I would think most Linux users use the version of Firefox already included in their distribution, instead of downloading it from the Mozilla site.
    47. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people don't want choice. I don't mean they have no preference between choice and no choice, I mean that they prefer no choice.



      They're going to have a problem once they need a car. "Oh no, I can't chose between the Lada and the Ferrari".
    48. Re:Dear Internet, by mentat1978 · · Score: 1

      I use Windows XP on the desktop and Debian GNU/Linux on my router and server. I know that Windows XP is insecure, and surfing with IE is a very quick way to install malware on your computer. Thats why I run Firefox. And by the way, I have no problems with XP. It's an easy and uncomplicated system that runs all of the software I need. Some people may think it's funny to dig into the techincal stuff to do things thats easy and just works in Windows. I love techincal stuff, but thats just when i choose to myself. If you run Linux on the desktop it's mandatory. So whats the problem when you have the techincal knowhow to avoid the security problems of Windows, and you get all the advantages of running a stable and easy to use OS?

    49. Re:Dear Internet, by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      I must seriously disagree. I don't understand how you can miss the connection between choice and freedom. Choice IS freedom! When one exists, so does the other. Is a country which gives you only one choice for President a free country? What is freedom if not the ability to make different choices for living your life than the others around you?

      What you are advocating is RMS's idea of freedom, because implicit in your argument is that non-free software (shareware) isn't a choice and isn't free. Your argument is the 'F' in 'FOSS', however the parent explicitly used 'FOSS' to indicate he was using the wider definition of 'freedom', including Open Source which argues that FOS and proprietary can coexist. In this case, the choice, and therefore the freedom, is *between* FOSS and shareware and even MS's monopoly. Just because you and I don't see the latter 2 as either "free" or good choices doesn't mean that others (like the grandparent) won't see them as choices. Since they are choices for some, that makes it a freedom (even if we disagree with their reasoning).

      Even though I probably agree with you on many things, and have used and will always prefer the GPL, for me FOSS is all about *choice*. Freedom is implicit in that, but choice is the most practical and beneficial element involved. With FOSS, I don't have to worry about one company telling me how to use my computer. I have numerous choices that I don't have with Windows: Linux over BSD, CLI over X11 (or CLI within X11), KDE over GNOME, Debian over Red Hat, Python over Perl, Gimp over KPaint, etc, etc. For some this is construed as a disadvantage (they have different goals than we do), but to me this is FOSS's true strength.

    50. Re:Dear Internet, by lachlan76 · · Score: 1
    51. Re:Dear Internet, by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Monopoly or not, Microsoft knows how to build a solid OS.

      I agree. Windows XP is exactly what we needed ... in 1997.

      That's why I run Linux at home while my company runs XP at work. A day late, but not a dollar short ... actually many dollars over budget.

      I switched to Opera a few years ago and have been *much* happier.

      Here we can agree. I paid for an Opera license and have never regretted it.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    52. Re:Dear Internet, by ecko3437 · · Score: 0

      You miss my point.

      localhost == 127.0.0.1, or am I mistaken?

      Remote formating, or attempting to, from that computer would, well... you get the idea.

      --
      -Eric Smith
    53. Re:Dear Internet, by blengino · · Score: 1

      Communism and capitalism are ways to manage the economic life. Democracie and totalitarism are ways to manage the politic life. So for real you have four ways to implement them. The only extended cuasi-implementation of communism was totalitarian; the capitalism implementations are totalitarian and some have implemented a limited democratic way. A real democratic way hasn't been implemented yet. But i would like to see on a real democracie wich economic system starts to rise

      --
      Sorry about my bad english, isn't my natural language
      America starts in Tierra del Fuego and ends in Alaska
    54. Re:Dear Internet, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now internet explorer, on the other hand, I wouldn't touch with a 10 pica pole. I switched to Opera a few years ago and have been *much* happier

      Yes but Opera is only a shell around the ie engine, now Firefox is different altogether, not even the same engine at all. In fact, I don't think its even an egine, could just be a waterwheel for all I know.

      Anonymous Coward indeed! I'm not Anonymous!

    55. Re:Dear Internet, by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Hardly cuts to the bone though does it? As I said, you have a great choice of software if all you use is Shareware. Doesn't mean you're very free. If you want to make the case that FOSS is all about choice then talk about the choice to fix your software yourself, or the choice to hire someone else to fix your software, or the choice to modify your software to your personal liking and share that software with others. These are the choices that have given you the choice over which window manager you use. If it were not for these choices (call them developer choices) we wouldn't have the other choices (call them user choices). Choice is about freedom, but you can trade your freedom for choice.. if that's a good deal to you then fine, do it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    56. Re:Dear Internet, by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Doh! Get it now... heh.

    57. Re:Dear Internet, by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      LOL! Thanks, I bookmarked the page.

  2. /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Something tells me his server still uses Windows though...

    1. Re:/.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean you actually tried to RTFA?

    2. Re:/.ed by southpolesammy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it looks like Linux....

      Netcraft output
      ---------------
      Linux Apache 29-Feb-2004 69.5.25.92 FUTUREQUEST INC

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    3. Re:/.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.xyzc omputing.com

      aww...well...maybe the next /.ed server will be a Windows machine.

    4. Re:/.ed by Kethinov · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    5. Re:/.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impossible! How dare you blaspheme my God Linux and his most holy saint Linus! /em scuttles off to resume prayers to his God.

    6. Re:/.ed by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      Impossible! How dare you blaspheme my God Linux and his most holy saint Linus! /em scuttles off to resume prayers to his God. Running Linux isn't going to stop you from being /.'d, only your connection and optimization of webcode can help that. So don't worry, Linux is not to blame.

    7. Re:/.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if it was running IIS people would be blaming IIS. Even though it wouldn't be IIS's fault any more than it is Apaches fault. And even though IIS does suck.

    8. Re:/.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why does this become a Linux thing, then? There are always going to be idiots who think Windows is a mature, secure operating system that doesn't crash, just like there will always be idiots who think Linux is a mature, perfect operating system that will never crash.

  3. Dear Windows... by bobbis.u · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, I bet he doesn't have a real girlfriend to write the letter to! If he does, he probably spends more time with his OS (or should that be SO?!)

    1. Re: Dear Windows... by MooseByte · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Well, I bet he doesn't have a real girlfriend to write the letter to!"

      And future dating prospects are equally bleak when women find out he ended the affair to pursue his newfound love and infatuation with a slightly oily flightless bird that smells of herring.

      (They sure are cuddly at night though...)

    2. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? What accountability? Have you read one of Microsoft's EULAs recently?

    3. Re:Dear Windows... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Funny

      You dont need a girlfriend to write/get letters to/from one!

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=20118&item=3750545897&rd=1

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    4. Re:Dear Windows... by yamla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You allow Microsoft to disclaim almost all accountability when you accept the EULA.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    5. Re:Dear Windows... by IANAAC · · Score: 5, Funny

      Read the prenuptual agreement. You won't be so happy.

    6. Re:Dear Windows... by Norgus · · Score: 1
      You have a point about games I suppose, industry-standard word processing? I believe open office is on linux too, no? I mean its certain your not talking about microsoft office, seeing as it isnt a standard in any sense of the word.

      And not having crashed in months is almost a matter of luck.

    7. Re:Dear Windows... by agentkhaki · · Score: 1

      Dear OS X,

      You let me run the games I want to play...

      Ahem... Let's try that again...

      Dear OS X,

      You let me run the ... industry-standard word processing ... software I need to use in my job, and you haven't crashed on me in months. ... I know that there is ... accountability in your design.

      --
      Ack!
    8. Re:Dear Windows... by scowling · · Score: 1

      Whether or not EULAs are binding is up in the air. They haven't yet been tested in my jurisdiction (BC), but they would probably fail. IANAL, but I work in a legislative setting.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    9. Re:Dear Windows... by maximilln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      at least I know that there is some accountability in your design

      What delusion negates the EULA? Windows has no accountability.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    10. Re:Dear Windows... by scowling · · Score: 1

      OS X doesn't run the publishing or word processing software I need in my job. That is, it doesn't run that software under Windows.

      It boils down like this: when everyone I exchange files with uses Windows, I need to use Windows, too.

      (And now at work we're looking to buy a publishing system that runs only under Windows. What, am I supposed to make it work with forty copies of Star Office or something and train a bunch of people to use a new OS and word processing system?)

      And it definitely doesn't run the games I want to play.

      I understand that people think that OS X or Linux or Be or whatever can work for any solution, but they can't. People know Windows. People know MS Word. Someone wants to start a foundation and send us a bunch of free money to train these people to use fringe software under fringe OSes, we might consider it.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    11. Re:Dear Windows... by rco3 · · Score: 1

      You know... it's not because Windows is somehow better that you can use the "industry-standard" word-processing and publishing software. What about OSX? It runs those same packages... No, the reason that (e.g.) Linux doesn't run Word, PowerPoint, Photoshop, etc., is because those vendors have CHOSEN not to release those packages on any platform other than Windows and (grudgingly) OSX. That's a marketing decision, especially in the case of MS Office, not a technical decision.

      It is nice that XP doesn't crash as much as Me did. I believe that you can place the credit for that improvement squarely on the competition; until something else came along and pointed up how crash-prone earlier Windows versions were (and let's be honest, MacOS10 weren't much better, if any), Microsoft had no reason to improve.

      Now, the thing that really puzzles me is this: How does "accountability in ... design" make up for the security issues? It's pretty clear that when Ballmer and Gates, et al., have to specifically tell both their own company and the world, publically, that MS will now stop new development to concentrate on improving security in Windows, there's an overall flaw in the security strategy. Apparently, "accountability in ... design" doesn't solve that problem. What does that even mean? Accountability? To whom? Who is accountable? Do *you* get to call WHGates and say, "Hey! I got a virus, and I want you to fix it! I want my money back, too!"? No. Unless your name is Michael Dell, and even then you ask VERY politely. No sir, you run multiple spyware, spybot, and virus scanners. You have a hardened firewall between your PC and the rest of the web. You post armed guards in front of your floppy drive. I'm still amazed at having to get someone from IT to come type in the administrator password so that we could install the patch for Sasser, even though the worm itself had NO trouble getting in...

      What you're seeing, vis-a-vis your desired software not being available under Linux, is 3 parts inertia and 1 part ease-of use. There are many people who find differently; they find that all of the software that they need to use in their daily jobs is available on several platforms, including Linux and OSX - especially in the scientific and educational fields.

      You could make a valid criticism about the difficulty of installing and administrating Linux, and you'd be at least partially correct. Some of that difficulty is due to unfamiliarity, some is due to ongoing development, and some is by design. :-) Clearly, for you, Windows is the best choice. But let's be honest about why that is, OK?

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    12. Re:Dear Windows... by scowling · · Score: 1

      MS Office is the most-used office suite in the world and MS Word the most-used word processing package. They are therefore a de facto industry standard, in *every* sense of the word.

      My work and home PCs run 24 hours a day under WinXP. It's stable as a concrete foundation with earthquake springs. It's not luck.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    13. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Troll,

      My PS2 lets me run the games I want to play. Openoffice lets me do my word processing. Quanta and GIMP take care of my web development needs. My machine hasn't crashed in months either.

      I suggest you spend more money on your wife than you do on your operating system, industry standard software, and computer security.

      By the way, she says she'll be home by 5:30 or 6ish.

    14. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Industry standard and open standards are not the same thing. I assure you that Word and Excel are industry standards.

      As for stability. I just checked the logs on my Windows 2000 laptop and it was last restarted on August 30. That is almost a full month of uptime. Luck had nothing to do with it unless you consider chosing 2000 over 9X or XP lucky.

    15. Re:Dear Windows... by scowling · · Score: 1

      [You know... it's not because Windows is somehow better that you can use the "industry-standard" word-processing and publishing software]

      Correct. You've got it backwards. It's not better because of that; it's because of that, that it's better. I explained in another post how OS X wouldn't cut it.

      I'd say five parts ease-of-use, three parts cost-effectiveness and two parts inertia (and inertia is always a valid argument; if something ain't broke, why fix it?)

      [But let's be honest about why that is, OK?]

      You're implying that I'm not being honest. Care to explain where and why?

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    16. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am ok with most of your post except for the stability part. You have it backwards there. Mac needed very desperately to develop a stable OS to survive. Up until OS X their OS was a disaster while Windows NT 4 was nearly as stable as Unix. Microsofts big issue wasn't making things stable but making their consumer OS stable while keeping the legacy DOS people happy.

    17. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. You post anonymously. He doesn't, and gets +5 with no troll modifier.

      Who's the troll? Or am I new here?

    18. Re:Dear Windows... by rco3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "when everyone I exchange files with uses Windows, I need to use Windows, too"

      This is demonstrably untrue. Several Windows computers in my office print through my Samba shares. I exchange Word and OpenOffice files with people running Windows, OSX, and Linux daily.

      Were you using Office on OSX, those files would interchange easily between OSX and Windows. Similarly, were you using OpenOffice, you could exchange files between Windows, OSX, Linux, xBSD, Solaris, etc. Photoshop files created on a Mac open just fine on a Windows PC. Jpegs are jpegs, ditto pngs, GIFs, etc. PDF works great in the rest of the computing world.

      If the boss says "Use Windows," you use Windows. Reason goes out the [ahem] window. But you, personally, present reasons which simply aren't correct.

      Am I saying you should use Linux? No. What I'm saying is that all the reasons you keep reciting why you CAN'T are wrong.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    19. Re:Dear Windows... by yamla · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you that MS Office (and especially MS Word) are the industry standard, you may be aware that MS Office does not have great MS Office-compatibility. Yes, you read that correctly. Just changing a printer that your document is set to print with may break your carefully laid out paginations. This is much more likely to happen if you transfer your document to a different version of Office or especially from the Windows to the Mac version.

      And of course, you cannot expect that many of your plugin objects will work on the Mac version of MS Office if you created the document in the Windows version, or vice versa.

      Perhaps my definition of compatibility is a little strict, but it certainly seems reasonable to me to expect I'd be able to open a document created in MS Office on a different computer and it would look and print exactly the same. This simply is not the case.

      I cannot speak for Openoffice. It may be no better.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    20. Re:Dear Windows... by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Yes. MacOS10 was a stability disaster. NT4 was clearly more stable than 9x series, and certainly less so than (say) Solaris.

      I wasn't considering NT4 to be a desktop OS, but that could just be me. It's certainly not a gaming OS as the grandparent poster desires. I'd like to think that my original point about MS needing to improve stability as a result of competition is still valid.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    21. Re:Dear Windows... by scowling · · Score: 1

      This is demonstrably untrue.

      My experience is that you are incorrect. That reason alone would be enough to not switch.

      What I'm saying is that all the reasons you keep reciting why you CAN'T are wrong.

      That it would be more expensive to train several dozen non-technical staff to use software that they will never use elsewhere is 'wrong'?

      Then I don't want to be right.

      (Though I am.)

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    22. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bad. I almost looked at that Funny modifier and saw Troll...but the moderators obviously have a better sense of humor than I do.

    23. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see - stolid as a rock? Ummm not quite. Im running both XP SP1 and SP2 on several computers. Rock isn't quite the word I would use. For the one with SP2 on it - sponge would be much more appropriate. For the SP1s I will admit that perhaps cold butter would describe their stability - they crash at least once a week - an improvement over windows 95, but not a huge one.

      And as for linux stability - Ive had linux only crash once on me, that was while trying to compile the kernel on a computer with 64mbs of RAM, and without and swap space (gentoo install, forgot to type swapon).

    24. Re:Dear Windows... by dema · · Score: 1

      Dear OS X...

      You let me run the games I want to play, the industry-standard word processing and publishing software I need to use in my job, and haven't crashed on me in months. You security is solid, enough said.

      I'll be home by 6.

      News flash, we don't all "want" the same thing, and your "industry-standard" runs just fine on OS X. What exactly do the mods find "Interesting" about this dribble?

    25. Re:Dear Windows... by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > I assure you that Word and Excel are industry standards.

      So pray tell me what is your definition of industry standards. No, tell me your definition of industry. Does a file format that is not documented and isn't even fully implemented by more than a monopolist company make a industry?

      The day MS fully documents their file formats, then they will have a chance at having some standards compliance. Until them, OpenOffice.org's file formats is being considered for a real, honest-to-God ISO standard.

      > I just checked the logs on my Windows 2000 laptop and it was last restarted on August 30

      That's what's so funny about MS advocates, their low level of expectations. Un*x can run for years, even when you update software and reconfigure stuff.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    26. Re:Dear Windows... by Peaker · · Score: 1

      Gee, too bad I have to use software that works, I can fix with someone actually listening to my bug reports, instead of having to use a closed program that is an industry standard. Tell me, how do you handle all the joy you get from using industry standards with bugs you are stuck with, cannot fix, and no direct contact with any of the developers?

      Hey, you also mentioned Accountability.

      That's a good one :)

    27. Re: Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just stick their feet in your pockets and...

    28. Re:Dear Windows... by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Well, lessee. I don't want to imply that you are a liar; I do, however, believe that several of your statements/implications are false-to-fact.

      Your explanation about OSX centers around incompatibility between files created on one OS but transferred to another; this is only true, occasionally, with MSOffice. It is possible that Office has some particular little feature that makes it the only possible package that you can use in your specific application; however, for nearly all WP tasks, OpenOffice can perform all needed functions just as easily. It reads and writes Word files, too. As another poster pointed out, Word often has incompatibilities between machines running the same version of Windows; Open Office has no such trouble, even between differing OS's.

      You said, and I understand more exactly now what you meant, that Windows is better because industry-standard software (I'm assuming you mean MSOffice and Photoshop) runs on it. I take exception to your non-specific use of the word "better", and feel that "a better choice for me" is a more accurate and honest phrasing. It certainly isn't better for me. Nor are you specifying what it is better than; I repeat that OSX satisfies all of your requirements in that regard, including interoperability of generated files. It may be that there are some other "industry-standard" programs you use which I'm not accounting for; that might change my assertion.

      The accountability part is still the part I have the most trouble with. You said elsewhere that the EULA hasn't been tested and probably wouldn't hold up; that's a pretty dishonest argument, sir. The fact is that you DID agree to that EULA, that Microsoft fully intend for you to abide by it, and that they have ridiculously deep legal pockets with which to enforce it. It further avoids the fact that even were you correct that it wouldn't hold up if tested, that accountability still has gotten you nothing. You got that accountability in trade for security, which is a bad deal IMHO.

      Now, cost-effectiveness is a particularly thorny issue, and that see-saw tips variously depending on what factors you choose to account for. If it's just purchase price, Linux wins hands-down. If you include training of existing Windows-oriented personnel, Windows gains a distinct advantage over OSX and *nix. This advantage is drastically reduced if you are training new hires or inexperienced personnel - I'd assert that OSX has the advantage here. If you count maintenance, then you have to determine exactly what maintenance, who does it, etc. It's certainly possible to maintain a *nix system with less down-time, simply because you can implement patches without rebooting - not mention that there are fewer patches needed. If you add in lost employee hours due to virii, etc, you can get almost any result you want. There are four kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, statistics, and benchmarks.

      Again, sir, I point out that in your situation, Windows may in fact be the best choice. I am certainly not telling you it isn't. It may be worth the additional security risks, software costs, etc., in order to achieve compatibility with specific software and reduce training costs. What I'm pointing out is that many of the reasons you cite are based on a very narrow view of compatibility, etc. I believe, but cannot definitively state due to incomplete knowledge of your specific situation, that inertia plays a greater role in your beliefs than actual experience with the issues involved.

      Thanks for the reasoned debate. It's refreshing.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    29. Re:Dear Windows... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful


      You're implying that I'm not being honest. Care to explain where and why?

      I'm not the original poster, but I'd say it's where you claimed that Foo is better when its the events surrounding Foo that are better. It's like claiming that one railroad gauge is "better" than another just because it happens to be the one most of the railroad tracks were built for, when there is nothing inherently better about it. It's just the choice that causes the least hassle. It's like you've never heard of the idea of an "arbitrary decision". Sometimes everyone benefits by everyone picking the same arbitrary decision, even when there is nothing whatsoever that is better about that decision other than the fact that it's the same decision other people are making.

      If we are making up a new secret code to use with telegraphs, and there are two other people in our club who have already started saying that "1 beep = yes, 2 beeps = no", then it would be advantageous for us to also pick the same rule instead of going the other way around. But even so it would still be incredibly dishonest to say that "1 beep for yes is a better system than 2 beeps for yes". It's not better. It's just a consistent arbitrary choice - just like the way the industry has standardized on Windows.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    30. Re:Dear Windows... by rco3 · · Score: 1

      1) I never told you to switch. Furthermore, my experience is that *you* are incorrect. I have switched; I've seen both sides. We are at an impasse.

      2) You didn't say you couldn't switch because it would cost too much, and no-one would ever use the software elsewhere; you said you have to use Windows because inter-platform compatibility is impossible. This IS untrue, and therefore you ARE wrong.

      3) If you don't want to be right, I certainly won't force you. :-)

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    31. Re:Dear Windows... by wtrmute · · Score: 1
      I'd say five parts ease-of-use, three parts cost-effectiveness and two parts inertia (and inertia is always a valid argument; if something ain't broke, why fix it?)

      Unfortunately, it's not that Windows "ain't broke", because it is; it's that it's just not broken enough for people to get off their asses and learn alternatives.

      Very much unfortunately, an OS is in many ways like a language. One has to learn it, and it's not a single day affair. Oftentimes one will want to use structures from the languages one does know, especially if one only knows a single language; simply because one does not see these features as being intrinsic to the language so much as to human communication itself! Now substitute "OS" for "language" above, and "computing" for "human communication". See what I mean?

      Quite a bit has been said about the need for Linux to become more "user-friendly" (read: like Windows), but truth is that teaching Windows to a lay user is every bit as difficult as teaching Linux to one, or to a Windows user. And the Windows user is especially obnoxious because he'll think, "why can't this be like I've already learned? Why must I learn things over again?", and will rather just default back to what they already know -- Windows. Therefore, the "Year of the Linux Desktop" is a myth: instead only if we teach the people who learn "computer science" (that is, Windows, Word and Excel) in schools and specialized courses to learn Linux, OpenOffice.org Writer and Calc instead. Only then we will see the market share of Windows really fall on the desktop.

      In short, your five parts ease-of-use are actually five parts inertia...

    32. Re:Dear Windows... by scowling · · Score: 1

      In short, your five parts ease-of-use are actually five parts inertia...

      No, it's ease of use. Turn on the workstation, it boots. Double-click MS Word. Type. I can explain that to a traditional editor who has never used a computer before.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    33. Re:Dear Windows... by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      You mean MacOS 9? :)

      NT4 made a pretty reasonable workstation; your productivity apps and such certainly ran on it (well, depends what you do). Games? Well, these would be machines at work; you'd probably appreciate it not crashing every five minutes more than being able to run Quake III (well.. ;)

      I'll just snigger quietly at the server aspects.

    34. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems you probably have crappy (generic, cheap) hardware. I haven't had Windows XP crash on me in over a year from any reason that wouldn't also have crashed Linux (hardware failure caused a crash once). However, I've had Linux lock up on me so tight 5 times in one day that I had to power cycle it, but that one wasn't my machine. My home Linux box locked up on me a couple times but it was because of nVidia video drivers.

      Anybody these days that has a machine as unstable as you describe is doing something seriously wrong.

    35. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really funny. Except you're wrong. MS Office is a de-facto standard and while you may not like it, I gather somewhere deep inside you know it, too.

      And by the way, OO crashes, also.

    36. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So pray tell me what is your definition of industry standards. No, tell me your definition of industry. Does a file format that is not documented and isn't even fully implemented by more than a monopolist company make a industry?

      Easy, even I can answer this. In this case an industry standard is a software package that a vast majority of businesses use and require their partners to use. Please stop nitpicking, you're not impressing anyone.

      That's what's so funny about MS advocates, their low level of expectations. Un*x can run for years, even when you update software and reconfigure stuff.

      That's so funny about you, you expect that an average business user is interested if his laptop can run for more than a week uninterrupted. Who cares? Not all computers are servers, you know. And an average user doesn't reconfigure stuff, they just use the damn computers for work.
    37. Re:Dear Windows... by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. No, it's ease of use. Turn on the workstation, it boots. Double-click MS Word. Type. I can explain that to a traditional editor who has never used a computer before.

      Then, how does that differ from Linux (KDE or Gnome + OpenOffice.org / Crossover Office + MS Word) or Mac OS/OS X (OOo or MS Word)?

      If the person has never used a computer before (?), they will find the task you outlined as easy or befuddling on any of these systems. (An argument could be made for other tasks being easier/harder on specific systems -- though that's not your claim as I understand it.)

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    38. Re:Dear Windows... by kai.chan · · Score: 1

      >> "counter 1"

      I can already tell that millions of Slashdot users are refreshing that auction page every minute eagerly awaiting the final seconds to place their bids. The counter is so borked, it doesn't just overflow, it just stopped working altogether.

    39. Re:Dear Windows... by rogabean · · Score: 1

      all I keep seeing in that post is "pagina"tions

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    40. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay! Low digit trolls are the best. Somebody already defined industry standard for you so I don't need to address that but I can't believe how stupid your comment about low expectations is. The last time I restarted wasn't because I crashed or had to restart but because I was off the whole last week of August because of the RNC. No matter what I think 30 days can be considered reliable for a desktop.

      If you're curious my linux server has been up only for 20 days but that was because of a hardware upgrade.

    41. Re:Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Blizzard games worked awesome on NT 4 and most other games worked on Windows 2000 which predated OS X by just over a year (2/2000 vs 3/2001). OS X really wasn't considered production worthy until 10.1 which came out in September 2001 around the same time that XP went Gold. Seems to me that Microsoft wasn't the one playing catch up.

      Sorry.

    42. Re:Dear Windows... by rco3 · · Score: 1

      that was intended to say OS [less than] 10 - however, I forgot that the less-than symbol would be interpreted/rendered. Ooops. I am particularly fond of OSX. Apologies to all.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    43. Re:Dear Windows... by westlake · · Score: 1

      within a half hour drive on any given night there will be at least three schools, community colleges and urban outreach centers offering courses in Office. local employers want these skills and they are marketable at any age.

    44. Re: Dear Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "slightly oily flightless bird that smells of herring"

      It's better than a paperclip.

    45. Re:Dear Windows... by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      They say you can judge the progress of a society by the state of its online auction services.

    46. Re:Dear Windows... by wtrmute · · Score: 1

      Sorry, on my vanilla Linux system (a Knoppix HD install, actually), it's turn computer on, it boots, log in, click on the Writer icon, it loads. The only extra step is the login, which isn't very hard to explain to the average user. Of course, one can set the display manager to do auto-login, though I certainly wouldn't recommend it...

  4. SC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SC == SpaceCanary? I think so.

    You found your own letter pretty funny? Thanks for sharing.

    1. Re:SC? by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for just about everybody when I say I think he's the only one.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    2. Re:SC? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was my first thought. Shameless.

      In other news... ...my mom thinks I'm handsome. ...I think I'm hilarious. ...when I drink, I become a better singer.

    3. Re:SC? by No+Tears+In+The+End · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news... ...my mom thinks I'm handsome.

      If she thinks YOU'RE handsome, she'll definately let me hit it. What's her number?

      NTITE

      --

      -You can cry, but you'll still die. There'll be no tears in the end.
    4. Re:SC? by mreed911 · · Score: 1

      In other news... my mom thinks I'm handsome when I drink.

      LMFAO!!!

    5. Re:SC? by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      Space Canary Operations??
      DONT read that FA, they will hunt you with IP lawsuits :\

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  5. Well by sulli · · Score: 1, Interesting

    More people are moving away from Linux, too. Will we see their Dear Tux letters?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Well by yagu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More people are moving away? More people are moving away than towards Linux? More people are moving away from Linux than are moving away from Windows? More people are moving away from Linux than moving towards Windows? Sheesh. Your "thesis" needs work. You've basically stated nothing.

      That said, should I see a Dear Tux letter somewhere I'll post it on /..

    2. Re:Well by yagu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny.

      I studied over the weekend, so I'm ready for my test.

      Yes, a statement of fact does not and never will consist of a thesis. But the OP IMO isn't stating any fact. It seems to be a non sequitur since it doesn't qualify (let alone quantify). More people are moving away from linux doesn't sound like a fact to me -- it's too indefinite.

      Gotta go, gotta get ready for my PSAT.

    3. Re:Well by SimianOverlord · · Score: 1

      That unusual blue writing that comprised the sentence is what is know colloquially as a "link". Perhaps if you click on it, it will explain the sentence itself. ...()...What do you know, it does? Well, I think we've all learnt an important lesson today. Perhaps sentences on the Internet which are also hyperlinks have meaning beyond just what is immediately obvious.

      By the way, if you're still having trouble, they're moving to Windows. Thanks! Come Again!

      --
      Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    4. Re:Well by yagu · · Score: 1

      Been there, read that. The article did NOT answer the question. Thanks for the mini-lesson. (I do read the articles...)

      Also, for the record, the "link" of which you speak is a meta-link on which site you must infer and find the link leading to the alleged "real" info to support the statement. Of course, once you find that link, you'll find it gets re-referenced to the home page of eweek, which gives you nothing regards what article you meant to see.

      Fortunately, I had read that /. thread, and I had read the article, but it does little to illuminate the original poster's statement.

      So, in addition to learning a little about hyperlinks and the Internet today perhaps we learned a little about hubris and humility.

    5. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, you're a junior in high school?

    6. Re:Well by PKPerson · · Score: 1

      I think sulli ment thet more people have been moving away from linux than before, but of course, more people are still moving twards from linux than away. I use windows, but I like linux. Even though I am writing this on XP doesent mean I love windows, nor does it mean I dislike linux. I really only use Windows for 2 reasions: I am 14, I have a brother, he is athletic and theres no way i could get him to learn linux, plus i have to admit, there are more/better games for Windows, which I dont want go give up yet. I still use linux on my other two boxes, and eventuially when we get a new box, i will install linux on the older one and it will preform just as well as the new XP one.

    7. Re:Well by SimianOverlord · · Score: 1
      So, just to clarify...

      You read "More people are moving away from Linux"

      You followed the link to a Slashdot story which, in its write up stated "several companies [...] have migrated from Linux to Windows"

      What could Sulli have meant?

      That, while one person (quoted in this story summary itself) is moving away from Microsoft, more (i.e a greater number) have been known to move away from Linux, as reported on Slashdot?

      I'm just as confused as you are. I'm wading in a sea of confusion here. The mud of confusion is seeping into my wellies.

      --
      Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    8. Re:Well by yagu · · Score: 1

      Also, for the record, while you refer to the link as a colloquial expression, it is probably more properly an idiomatic expression. Sorry to be pedantic.

    9. Re:Well by SimianOverlord · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't want to start a flamewar here but I think it could be regarded as a colloquial AND idiomatic expression. So everyone's a winner.

      Jinx! No comebacks!

      --
      Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    10. Re:Well by yagu · · Score: 1

      I'll buy that. Jolly good.

  6. first +1 post? by bmalnad · · Score: 0

    If I had visual studio and the .Net framework on Mao OS X, I'd throw away all of my other computers.

    --
    Free Scotland!
    1. Re:first +1 post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mao OS X?

      Dear bmalnad,

      I noticed you misspelled "Mac." You replaced the "c" with an "o." I formally request you stop drinking.

      Sincerely,
      Some anonymous coward

    2. Re:first +1 post? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      It may not be Visual Studio, OR .Net but you could always try Mono.

      When I got my Mac I said the same thing... that I couldn't get rid of my PC completely because I had just gotten a fresh copy of Visual Studio .NET and I still wanted to tinker with it.

      Haven't booted the PC since... (of course thats not saying Visual Studio sucks, its certainly more mature than Xcode... but not booting Windows is worth it.)

    3. Re:first +1 post? by das_katz_socrates · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I had visual studio and the .Net framework on Mao OS X, I'd throw away all of my other computers.

      Mao OS was that the one the chinese were developing?

      --
      This sig has no nutritional value...
    4. Re:first +1 post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... but 1/10th the develepment studio is just not really going to cut it...

      And if you are really serious about development, then it is well worth booting windows to use. I develop for Windows, Man and Linux and I do about 95% of my development of all cross platform code on Windows. The tools are head and shoulders above anything else.

      Then I boot Linux and turn on the mac when it comes to doing final test and debugging only.

    5. Re:first +1 post? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      I'd probably feel different about working in Windows if I didn't primarily use Access 2003 at work. After 8 hours of working in that POS, coming home to Windows is the last thing you'd wanna do. :)

      We're switching more and more to .NET, so we'll see how my outlook is once we drop that ungodly program.

    6. Re:first +1 post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mao OS X is a variant of CommUnix with a modified BASH shell that features a more powerful version of wall, kill, and an uber non-verbose rm -rf

      It pretends to efficiently use shared memory but doesn't really do too well with it. It likes to limit forking and control the number of child processes spawned. It has superior compression technology putting a lot of data into a smaller space.

      The OS will chown anything you put into the system. It offers Mao's Guardian which blocks unwanted western propaganda from being accessed over the Internet. Oh, and they really don't think the concept of BZFlag is funny at all.

    7. Re:first +1 post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Mao OS is from Shining Path.

    8. Re:first +1 post? by fitten · · Score: 1

      Heck, if Linux or MacOS X had VS.NET and my games and a couple other utilities, I'd not need Windows anymore either and I'd go with them. Unfortunately, I still have to keep my Windows boxes around because they are still too useful.

    9. Re:first +1 post? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I've found SharpDevelop to be a very palatable alternative to Visual Studio.Net, and expect to see it go cross platform within the next year or two. A mono port exists, called MonoDevelop, but without the all important form designer. As Windows Forms support in mono or dotgnu improves we may eventually see a full crossplatform port. Another possibility is that support for window toolkits like Gtk or SWT may eventually be added to SharpDevelop if it appears that Windows Forms support won't improve soon or Microsoft fights it (they patented the Windows Forms API).

    10. Re:first +1 post? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I hear you there. At least the games... everything else I've managed to get working under either Wine or Crossover Office. Heck, even IE works under Wine...

      I haven't tried VS.net, though I'm going to try VC++ 6.0 soon.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  7. Paperclip response by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey (*dink* *dink*), it looks like you're trying to write a letter.......

    1. Re:Paperclip response by AdolChristin · · Score: 1

      OH, ARGH! Not a Microsoft Office assistant joke. That's like, the worst kind of humor!

      --
      #include "forums.h"
      int main() {while (bollox) postcount++;}
    2. Re:Paperclip response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the f**k did you call me clippy? Dink dink?!? That's it, we're through!

    3. Re:Paperclip response by suso · · Score: 1

      No no no. The (*dink* *dink*) is the sound the paperclip makes when it taps on the glass of your monitor. Words enclosed in ** implies an action or sound.

    4. Re:Paperclip response by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clippy: "It looks like you're trying to write a hate letter. Please select from one or more of the following hate styles:"
      [X] Nazi
      [_] Bagdad Bob
      [X] SCO Lawyer
      [_] Lisp geek forced to use Java at work
      [_] Satan

    5. Re:Paperclip response by donbrock · · Score: 0

      One more equally hateful letter style: [_] Linux geek forced to use Windows at work

    6. Re:Paperclip response by Compholio · · Score: 1

      Hey (*dink* *dink*), it looks like you're trying to write a letter.......

      Does anyone have an english version of the clippy commercials saved? I found a taiwan copy (http://www.microsoft.com/taiwan/office/clippy/) but I miss the good old english one that microsoft mysteriously removed.

    7. Re:Paperclip response by torpor · · Score: 1

      [x] Java Programmer.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    8. Re:Paperclip response by Bastian · · Score: 1

      [X] Nazi
      [_] Bagdad Bob
      [X] SCO Lawyer
      [_] Lisp geek forced to use Java at work
      [_] Satan


      As a Lisp geek who has to use Java at work, let me suggest the following improvement to your list:
      [_] Nazi
      [_] Bagdad Bob
      [_] SCO Lawyer
      [_] Satan
      [X] All of the above
    9. Re:Paperclip response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Jimmy Swaggart.

    10. Re:Paperclip response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Errrrr, why did you bother posting that comment at all?

      To try to discourage the moron, obviously.

    11. Re:Paperclip response by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
      [X] Remote user whose link is repeatedly trashed by massive Office Assistant animation updates
      [_] MS-Word operator who's corrupted the one extant copy of a large and vital document
      --
      Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  8. Re:funny ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    you must be new here... anything that is M$ bashing is funny here!

  9. So what's new? by Skiron · · Score: 1, Troll

    Anybody could have wrote that letter (AOL users excempt).

    1. Re:So what's new? by j1bb3rj4bb3r · · Score: 0

      I'm not even going to touch this one...

      --
      *yawn*
    2. Re:So what's new? by cliveholloway · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyone could have used a spell checker (Skiron exempt).

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    3. Re:So what's new? by Allaran · · Score: 1

      How 'bout grammar glitches? Are they funny?

      'Anybody could have written that letter (Skiron exempt).'

      No offense Skiron. Just pickin' on ya.

    4. Re:So what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " That went out in 1996"

      The same year your library card expired , right ?

    5. Re:So what's new? by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      They're only funny when they're in a post by someone complaining about the inferior quality of somebody else's writing.

      I guess you missed that meeting.

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    6. Re:So what's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you'll write in to tell us that you won't touch it? Thanks for the update, I'll make sure the annals of history take note. Jackass.

  10. Dear Borg by nycheetah · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dear borg...I mean Micro$oft....
    No, wait, dear Borg$oft...

    1. Re:Dear Borg by Don+Tobin · · Score: 1

      Actually if you want to get this write you would refer to the coining of the term Borg (some Polish economist as I recall). It means bureaucratic organization, no it wasn't created in Star Trek.

      The term dysborgian came from the further analysis that beyond some point all bureaucracy becomes dysfunctional. Similar to a critical mass; it will continue to worsen exponentially the longer it's left in place.

      My question: is Microsoft already a dysborg, or are they still operating on the "functional and effective" side of bureauocracy?

  11. goodbye server by wattersa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Inaccessible, oh well. Is it on IIS? ;-)

    The idea reminds of Microsoft Wife, a joke that made the rounds years ago.

    1. Re:goodbye server by DogDude · · Score: 1
      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:goodbye server by rpbailey1642 · · Score: 4, Funny
      [...]Microsoft Wife[...]

      Well, at least you know that you won't have to wait until your birthday for her to go down on you.

    3. Re:goodbye server by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Hell, your birthday is the only day she won't go down on you...more than once.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:goodbye server by xtort17 · · Score: 1

      And her backdoor's probably open too.

    5. Re:goodbye server by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Heh... I bet Bill uses that on Melinda all the time...

      "Yeah baby... go down on me... go down like Windows"...

      I suppose, as long as I don't bring in to your mind any pictures of him using her backoffice... uhh...

      [PS: You're welcome]
      [PSS: Yes I know...]
      [PPSS: I'm a sick bastard], and

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  12. Slahdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 3-2-1

  13. Dear Server, by wikdwarlock · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sorry to have left files on you that were posted to /. We had some great times, you and I... sharing files w/ people all around the globe. I noticed that you started to glow red and smoke, but thought this was just a signal of your burning passion for me. Alas, I can now see that the pressure of servicing so many other people has taken its toll on you and you've succumbed. I'm sorry to see you go. Sincerely, Joe User P.S. You will receive a bill for the burnt hole in my carpet.

    --

    "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
  14. Someone needs to by AbbyNormal · · Score: 5, Funny

    write an Obituary for this guy's webserver.

    "IT was a spunky server, full of life and function, however the Good Lord deemed it necessary to remove this server from this world with an act of Slashdot".

    --
    Sig it.
    1. Re:Someone needs to by scupper · · Score: 1

      I vote for paperclip to do it. I wonder if he would attend the viewing of the body, er..case?

  15. Dear webserver by putch · · Score: 5, Funny

    see you in hell.

    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  16. Wow... by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    A dear John letter to an OS. Reminds me of when I had my last Pascal class on a VMS/VAX system:

    Dear VMS:
    You have tortured my life for the last time. I hate you with a pure and perfect hatred. Your renaming of my files is maddening. Your syntax is arcane and pointless. I would prefer attempting to cluster 500 Windows ME systems.

    It's not me, it's definitely you.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has moved from Linux to VMS for some server operations, I wonder what exactly you dislike so much about VMS? If by arcane you mean directory syntax: logicals, especially appropriately partitioned to groups/system/user/process/etc., are a lot less unwieldy than environment variables and the one-hierarchy-to-rule-them-all(except-when-we-igno re-one-of-the-n-standards) system. *What* renaming are you referring to? Have you even *tried* VMS clustering? I'm not a VMS zealot - I've barely used it for more than a few months - but it has to be the most unappreciated non-academic OS still under development.

    2. Re:Wow... by Procrastin8er · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you give your ex my number? We went steady for quite a while many years back, until I was lead astray by a sexy girl named Windows. Since then I have discovered that, despite her good looks, Windows is unstable and unreliable and pretty much a bitch. I long for the steady, reliable VMS I took to the prom. my number is 1-800-VAX-/VMS

      --
      Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
    3. Re:Wow... by bourne_id · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quote: I would prefer attempting to cluster 500 Windows ME systems.

      I tried to visualize attempting such a feat. My brain rejected the idea totally, much like a coredump. I now have a headache for my heresy...

      JMD

      --
      When all else fails, feel free to panic.
    4. Re:Wow... by j3110 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only thing I miss from VMS was the versioning filesystem that wasn't case sensitive. I use Linux now, and get angry every time I have to hit the shift key. Anyone storing xxx.jpg in the same directory with XXX.jpg needs to be shot. No one uses case sensitivity, because it's stupid. I also miss the versioning. I could just open xxx.jpg;2 for an older version. Now you pretty much need CVS and a decent CVS browser to get anything close to that kind of functionality.

      Why is there not one single case-insensitive filesystem for Linux? (FAT doesn't count, it's not a filesystem so much as a waste bin.)

      --
      Karma Clown
    5. Re:Wow... by julesh · · Score: 1

      To use an analogy I found in my 'fortunes' file... that's a task very much like herding cats.

    6. Re:Wow... by Greenisus · · Score: 1

      Sorry Windows . . . it isn't you, it's me. I don't like you.

    7. Re:Wow... by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      You bastard! You just brought back some 12 year old memories that I wanted to forget. So please no more mentioning VAX/VMS.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    8. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be writing one of those letters when I get done with my C++ class. It'll just be to Turbo C++, not C++ in General. A brief summary:

      Dear Turbo C++,
      Thank you for bringing me to the dawn of computer history with your extremely archaic software. I love the random crashing at compiling time and oh how I love that my files are randomly deleted, you bring shine to my life. Oh and I love your GUI.. oh wait... do you have one? oh nevermind, I must be confused. Thanks anyway.

    9. Re:Wow... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One wonders if by the use of an initrd you could get linux to use ntfs.sys... Not that I'd want to use NTFS as my root. Case sensitivity is pretty annoying but it's really not hurting anyone using a GUI. Anyone capable of using a CLI should be able to handle case sensitivity. I do admit that I would prefer case-preservation alone.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Wow... by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      Can you mount WebDav interfaces as filesystems yet? SubVersion + Apache 2 + mod_dav_svn + mount_webdav :)

      UFS snapshots on some other systems can be helpful in this regard too.. maybe I should make rm create one every time it's run ;)

      Think case insensitivity is a mount option to at least some fs's, btw. Should be fairly safe mouting /home with it at least.

    11. Re:Wow... by AJWM · · Score: 2, Funny
      Anyone storing xxx.jpg in the same directory with XXX.jpg needs to be shot. No one uses case sensitivity, because it's stupid.


      Oh, hey, no. It's great for disguising my pr0n collection:

      bar:~/pr0n $ ls
      XXX.JPG XXx.JPG XxX.JPG Xxx.JPG xXX.JPG xXx.JPG xxX.JPG xxx.JPG
      XXX.JPg XXx.JPg XxX.JPg Xxx.JPg xXX.JPg xXx.JPg xxX.JPg xxx.JPg
      XXX.JpG XXx.JpG XxX.JpG Xxx.JpG xXX.JpG xXx.JpG xxX.JpG xxx.JpG
      XXX.Jpg XXx.Jpg XxX.Jpg Xxx.Jpg xXX.Jpg xXx.Jpg xxX.Jpg xxx.Jpg
      XXX.jPG XXx.jPG XxX.jPG Xxx.jPG xXX.jPG xXx.jPG xxX.jPG xxx.jPG
      XXX.jPg XXx.jPg XxX.jPg Xxx.jPg xXX.jPg xXx.jPg xxX.jPg xxx.jPg
      XXX.jpG XXx.jpG XxX.jpG Xxx.jpG xXX.jpG xXx.jpG xxX.jpG xxx.jpG
      XXX.jpg XXx.jpg XxX.jpg Xxx.jpg xXX.jpg xXx.jpg xxX.jpg xxx.jpg
      bar:~/pr0n $
      --
      -- Alastair
    12. Re:Wow... by lorien420 · · Score: 1

      "Why is there not one single case-insensitive filesystem for Linux?"

      Because everybody that codes in C knows how to type in a case-sensitive manner.

      --
      "[We'll be] really getting inside your head and making it an unpleasant place to be" -- Trent Reznor
    13. Re:Wow... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      You actually sat and typed that in? You really need to get a life :)

    14. Re:Wow... by kgbspy · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, he just cut and pasted the ls of his pr0n dir ;)

      --
      ~
      ~
      ~
      -- INSERT --
    15. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say that's the first time I've laughed out loud from a slashdot comment in over a month.

    16. Re:Wow... by j3110 · · Score: 1

      HAHAHHA

      That could very well be so slow that I would need to put a Squid proxy in there to cache the requests! :)

      I'll definately look up the mount arguements. I think /tmp would be the only problem.

      --
      Karma Clown
    17. Re:Wow... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I actually prefer case sensitivity, but the whitespace thing gets on me nerves. Granted I don't exactly have a solution so I'm willing to live with the problem, but ti still gets on my nerves.

      At least the escape method is consistent. And * works for 99% of the situations you have to deal with spaces in filenames in bash.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    18. Re:Wow... by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      Anyone storing xxx.jpg in the same directory with XXX.jpg needs to be shot.

      Or, instead of having to go to the lengths of the death penalty, how about having a file system that's case insensitive except in the rare cases of ambiguity.
    19. Re:Wow... by j3110 · · Score: 1

      You could do that... me, I' would rather shoot them. :) Have you ever seen a program refence a file Config.ini, go edit the file, nothing changes, then you realize that there are two files! ... Yeah, perhaps death is too good for them. :)

      --
      Karma Clown
  17. quickest slashdotting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the record? Them darn paid subscribers nuked the thing before us plebes had a chance to laugh at it.

  18. Dear Slashdot... by kkovach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ahhhhhh! I'm on fire! Ahhhhhhh!

    - Web Server

    --
    The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    1. Re:Dear Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think that deserves a 5.

    2. Re:Dear Slashdot... by bhsx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your mod should go up to eleven. I almost ruined another monitor with Coke(TM).

      --
      put the what in the where?
    3. Re:Dear Slashdot... by shish · · Score: 1
      I am a nerd and don't undertand you no more

      I blame the bad grammar, ironically enough...

      (Also, the politics section. Screw the american election, I want a linux-driven lego-built robot monkey that makes me coffee whenever my eyelids get too close together!)

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    4. Re:Dear Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Good thing he moved away from MS. His new server is working out real well.

  19. Article Text by LanMan04 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dear Microsoft Windows,

    In retrospect, this letter should be of no surprise to you. For years now I have stood by you despite the terrible things people have said. We have always managed to work through our serious problems but too many things have been swept under the table. I do not think I can stand (idly) by you any longer.

    What's that? No, another service pack will not help, not this time. I remember when we met, a warm April day, in 1992. For years I had been hearing about you, about your graphical user interface, innovations, and problems in the courtroom... I had seen you here and there, but it was not until that fateful day, April 6, that our relationship became serious. Though you had changed with the times, never like this. I was almost knocked off my feet when I first saw you. Right then I knew it, you had to be mine. Who else could offer me what you could? I wanted, no, I needed, your TrueType font support, your video playback capability, your color screen savers...

    As time progressed so did my needs. Our affair took its next serious step on August 24, 1995. At the time I thought our happiness would never end. You brought me places I never thought possible. How could I refuse your Plug-and-Play cabability or your TCP/IP stack? I mean, you gave up your best friend, DOS, so our relationship could progress unhindered. It hurts me to look back at us, two starry-eyed lovers wanting nothing more than each other's company.

    Then it almost all came tumbling down. June 25, 1998. What were you thinking? Were you thinking at all? You changed, like in 1995, but not like I thought you would. Still clinging to your DOS kernel, like a small, lost child clutching its teddy bear. Where was the OS I had learned to love? You feebly proffered USB support, DVD playback, and a Quick Launch toolbar, but you were beginning to mix with a bad crowd. With that invasive Internet Explorer. I knew about what happened... You let him access your Explorer. I thought that was something special between us.

    Though we had a bit of a falling out afterwards, my love was rekindled after February 17th, 2000. You were once again new- Professional- just like I thought you could one day be. I knew you were once again stable, not like back in 1998, and that you were the only OS for me. I remembered what had drawn me you you in the first place- ease of use, speed, your stunning looks, your compatibility. I remember saying, "I hope things never change because I love you the way you are."

    I thought that what we had meant something- your transformation in 2000 seemed to cement that. I know now that I was wrong. By Sept 17 you tried to change for the Millennium. I saw right through you- trying to settle down and fit in better with the 'home-user'. Did you think I would love you more because of a few cosmetic changes? I was not impressed with the full-color icons, fancy skins, or your new media player. I thought what we had was deeper than that. Luckily you gave me a choicer, I did not have to choose the new you, the old version would be fine. I know you meant well but you just shouldn't have done that, especially with the '1998' episode so fresh in my mind.

    By October 25, 2001 more changes had come. Everyone told be how great the new you would be. I got so tired of hearing about how up to date, easy to work with, and slick looking you had become. That was all I could take. You changed so much that I didn't even know you any more. I really dug some of your new features but the old you, the you from 2000, could have done all this. So why did you have to change at all? I didn't want to upgrade you or make you into something you were not.

    Well, like I wrote, I have reached my limit. Its going to take more than an automatic update to fix our relationship. I just don't feel like I know you anymore. For example, do you know what I found on the computer a few days ago? Spyware! I wonder who let that in...

    Windows, I know you will try to

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1992?!

      Damn. Am I the only person in the world who stuck with DOS until 1998? I only moved to Windows when it was a necessity and then moved to linux almost the same year.

    2. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm .. because you are a whiney little bitch that counts mod points ...

    3. Re:Article Text by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think he's wasting his time.

      Windows attention span isn't that long.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're a karma whore.

    5. Re:Article Text by mreed911 · · Score: 5, Funny

      PS - Please don't be blue. And I'll be screening your calls...

      PPS - Yes, SP2 *does* make you look fat.

    6. Re:Article Text by bluFox · · Score: 5, Funny
      author:[q]You let him access your Explorer. I thought that was something special between us.[/q]

      m$w:hey but then by that time you were forcing me into two somes with that naughty grub & linux !! That was bad, really really bad,..
      how could i ever forgive u ??

      --
      ~561
    7. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a lot of the mods here are pissy little jealous whiners who can't stand seeing someone get modded up. /wait, was that a rhetorical question?

    8. Re:Article Text by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 4, Funny

      As time progressed so did my needs. Our affair took its next serious step on August 24, 1995.

      I think I need a shower...

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    9. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody explain to me what his complaints actually are? He seems pretty happy with Windows 2000 and I don't see anybody forcing him to upgrade at this time. Was it because he inadvertently installed spyware? Maybe he should stay away from Kazaa.

      And, I am sorry but I would never call Linux "fun" and "easy going". Stable, secure, reliable - yes. But I don't remember ever saying to myself - Linux is fun.

      The whole letter just seems like some mental masturbation. How about actually giving comparisons and listing out grievances.

    10. Re:Article Text by Deusy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Linux,

      In retrospect, this letter will be of complete surprise to you. For years I have stood by you, no matter how needy you have been. The time required has destroyed my once happy, fun filled life. I used to have friends, but you took them all away. You're just too high maintainence.

      We tried many different fashions to see if you'd change... from hats to french laungerie. But you were always the same, time consuming woman who wouldn't let me live my life. And boy are you fucking ugly. I've had to learn the magical mysterious of Hollywood make-up to make you look good in the past, although recently you've gotten a bit better at looking sexy without days of my undivided attention.

      There were good times. You were reliable, always around, always available. You were open and honest, and I could see into the very depths of your soul. But you were antisocial, getting anything to work with you was a chore and I've just about had enough of fighting with configuration files to get the most basic peripherals to work with you.

      Perhaps, when you've become more friendly, and you work just as well in your various styles, we can be one again.

      For now I'm off to that flashy babe Windows. She might be an expensive, unreliable whore, but she looks stunning and good in bed. (Can you go to bed with a computer?) Though I'll be back when she breaks my heart.

      (I would go with that super model MacOS X but she's out of my league - my wallet is only 'so' fat.)

      Fuck it. All the effort has to be worth something. I'll stick it out to see if, as they say year on year, this will be the year of the Linux desktop... the year it becomes easy. They have been saying it since 1997 but they can't be eternally wrong... can they?

      Yours probably forever due to cash shortage,
      C.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    11. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not click on the link in the parents sig, it is a porn site.

    12. Re:Article Text by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah Windows,
      How can I forget the first time that I saw you, in 1988, immature and overdressed like a 16 year old street-walker. The sparkle was eye-catching, but I knew that there was not enought maturity to keep me interested.

      It was years later before I had you thrust apon me again. An old friend of mine needed to use my 386sx to edit a Word document on, so he loaded up a mountain of diskettes and left you behind.
      Sure, it was fun at first with Solataire and, uh, solataire... But you got in the way and I was soon tired of running around between you, AutoCAD and my video games support.

      Next thing I knew, there you were in my workplace, pushing my old favorites like wordperfect and lotus around like the cheap little strumpet you are. Fortunately, I was able to take solace in my Motif desktop and RISC processors, intoxicated by their maturity and power.

      Of course, I started passing you off on other, less knowledgable computer users. I must have pimped you out thousands of times, "Oh sure, just USE windows" for this or that. There was even that "Coming of age" thing for my son when I let him have his way with you. What was it, a month, before you had overun his data with viruses...

      So now you try and pass yourself off as mature and worldly, no better game around huh? I hate to let you know it, but there's a pretty hot kid on the block, willing to do most anything (for free too), so why don't you just take a walk, windows.

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    13. Re:Article Text by Le+Marteau · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even though it is cool that you provided the article after it got slashdotted, there is no reason why your karma (as unimportant as it is) should be upped for doing so.

      Your post is a great example of what is wrong with the moderation system. People treat mod points as PERSONAL rewards and punishments. Mod points should more properly be viewed as rewards and punishments FOR THE POST.

      The post WAS informative. The site was dotted, and I wanted to read it. Thankfully, someone did.

      True, it would have been more elegant if the poster had gone AC for it, but the fact that the guy may have been a whore in no way makes the post any less 'informative'.

      But you, and others, will go ahead and use points to 'punish' people for being dicks. Go ahead, and be my guest. I, on the other hand, will use mod points as I belive they are intended: to allow users to separate the wheat from the chaff, should they so choose.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    14. Re:Article Text by anubi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, you are not.

      I still use it. Daily. For schematic capture, PCB layout, and cross-assembler/DSP C/C++ stuff.

      You see, I understand the file formats on these old files. And I know exactly how the programs work. And these programs were coded in a day where the programs would run on just about any machine you dropped them in. ( Mine require 386-16SX or higher, and are plenty fast on the minimal machine, albeit they now all are running in Pentiums for so much overkill it ain't funny.)

      The big draw for me is that I still have access to any drawing I have ever done, or anyone else in my group does. The formats don't change every couple of years and require me to constantly upgrade to something that works differently, along with the probability I screw up because I didn't catch some new "feature" properly.

      I chose the old programs wisely almost 20 years ago. They all have user definable libraries and do not have any "permission codes" or dongles required. They will fit on a floppy, and run on just about anything I can boot up in DOS.

      The only objection some may have is that the companies who generated these tools have been out of business now for ten years. So support is moot. But from my point of view, this software was coded solid as a hammer. I don't need support for the hammer. This software was coded solid enough it doesn't need support. It just does what its supposed to.. nothing more, nothing less.

      Actually, I see my using abandonware as a benefit, as there is no-one riding my back to enforce DRM or threaten me with lawyers if I take it on myself to open up the code if needed to customize it more to my liking.

      Yes, I know the later systems have all sorts of features, but I don't really think those new features save me as much effort. I see them like "insurance policies" sold for its "peace-of-mind" value, but said value vanishes when the claim is denied for the exclusions in small print.

      Yes, they tell me I can simulate in SPICE. And I do. But you know, I don't trust it yet. Spice models ideal components. Spice will often tell me something will work and lead me into false "peace of mind", when in reality small component variations lead me to a disaster when the product hits the consumer. Nah, I want a proto for me to run my hands all over when its running so I can introduce so many stray leakage paths and variances that just about anything that can fail will. (I exempt most SMPS power converters from this procedure).

      I had to leave a previous employer over this issue. But then I have seen them spend my salary dozens of times over trying to keep their legacy filebases accessible. I know my computational infrastructures are sound and will run the rest of my biological lifetime easily.

      Do I have a place for Windows? Yes. But its not for things I think I may need years from now. It to me is a pretty gizmo, quite easy to use, but its nothing I want to build a foundation on. But its damm nice for things where its very important to look good, but not important that it last. Like those "cardboard belts" that often come with a suit. Yes, they may look really good when dressing up for a job interview, but don't count on it holding your britches up for a year. Two or three days is about par for the course, but if it looks pretty enough to impress the suit guy, good enough. (My favorite belt is well used, not all that attractive, but quite functional).

      When I really have important stuff, its very important to me to know how to single-handedly recover from anything without losing damn near a quarter-century of work.

      I really hate to sign binding legal documents without understanding what I am agreeing to... likewise I really hate to use software I don't know exactly what its doing... especially if that software in question already has a history of being, as the article related to, a "cheating" lover who carries on trysts on the side. Rich men can afford that kind of thing, but frankly money is just too hard for me to come by to keep paying over and over again for me to just hold position.

      Long Live DOS!

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    15. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Windows ..... good in bed.

      Comment is unnecessary.

    16. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, 8% of the readers had to reboot in the middle..

    17. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People treat mod points as PERSONAL rewards and punishments. Mod points should more properly be viewed as rewards and punishments FOR THE POST.

      It would be PERSONAL if someone modded someone up or down based on their relationship (Friend/Foe) status . What I was talking about in the parent post has nothing to do with personal vendettas, and indeed it has EVERYTHING to do with the POST ITSELF.

      The only difference between someone posting the article text AC and posting under their UID is karma points. Just because the person posts AC does not make it any less informative, therefore, to avoid confusion it is "polite" to post AC.

      Anyway, grandparent had a few people respond to him in a rude manner without explaining *why* they had a problem with his post beyond them calling him a "karma-whore". Judging from his/her UID, I realized that the person was relatively new, and I thought I would take a second out of my day and clarify what they were experiencing in a more civilized manner. Unfortunately, no good deed goes unpunished on /., so I will just accept my current "Flamebait/Offtopic" and shut up now.

      Furthermore, in the interest of not blowing any more karma than necessary on this discussion which has already proven to be way more trouble than it's worth, I will tick the "Post Anonymously" box (just like grandparent should have in the first place).

    18. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're defending a guy who's got a sweepstakes link in his signature and posted under his UID to provide Slashdotted article text. While bitching about karma whores can get old, in this case it was deserved.

    19. Re:Article Text by shades66 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear C,
      I am sorry to hear of the difficulties understanding my ways. I only offered you so many options so that I could try and work the way you wanted me to. Not everyone understands my flexibility.

      I wish you success with your new babe called Windows. I understand that she is very strict and will only let you perform the functions that she wants you to perform. I also hear that she is very possesive and will try and stop you talking to others not like her and if you do she will show you her nasty blue side. Not wanting to slag her off I should warn you that she has a habbit of letting others use her, command her to do things you may not like, like giving out your credit card details, using the CPU cycle you paid for to send hundreds of emails to strangers and to allow others to perform criminal acts.

      So this is the end. Maybe one day you will come back and enjoy my freedoms.

      Love,
      Linux

      --
      ---- There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't
    20. Re:Article Text by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Note the "=)". That means I was kidding...since when did ./ become such a serious place? Karma shmarma. =)=)=)

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    21. Re:Article Text by maxpublic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Although not nearly so old as people posting criticism as anonymous cowards, because they don't even have the balls to use a bloody pseudonym!

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    22. Re:Article Text by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      Dear Linux, I just wanted to let you know that when you are ready to come back to me, it's just as easy as

      eject /dev/cupholder

      and putting in my install CD.

      Yours Truely,

      Windows LowerHorn

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    23. Re:Article Text by rawg · · Score: 1

      MS Windows... I took one look at it and ran for my life! I knew it was trash in 1992, and it's still trash today.

      OS/2 was good, but had no software.
      Linux was good, but hard to keep running.
      Mac OS X is just perfect.

      (PS, no I'm not rich)

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    24. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's wasting his time.

      Unlike us who has written 500 comments to his article so far.

      Sincerely yours,
      A.C.

    25. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think, I wasted time, reading this.

    26. Re:Article Text by miu · · Score: 1

      Creepy. It reads sort of like Gomer Pyle talking to his rifle in "Full Metal Jacket".

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    27. Re:Article Text by Nunar · · Score: 0

      In the immortal words of Chris Rock....

      "If a girl says she's 20 and she looks 16, she's 12. If she says she's 20 and looks 20, she's damn near 40."

      So I have to wonder about XP... Looks like the Fisher Price computer that my daughter uses to learn her ABCs.

      ---------
      If I didn't want you reading this, it would be encrypted

  20. Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by neuro.slug · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all, using Windows is like being with someone who:

    - Only lets you do things with her approval
    - Requires money once in a while to 'upgrade' her features
    - Doesn't allow you to even think about seeing anyone else besides her

    And to top it all off, you end up contracting a dozen or so STDs even though she says that she always uses protection.

    1. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Also, "whenever the littlest thing goes wrong, the whole world comes crashing down around her..."

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    2. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by mlylecarlin · · Score: 2, Funny

      But hey... at least she's easy. mlylecarlin

    3. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was one of the worst analogies I've ever heard.

      EVER.

      What kind of a sexless gomer would mod that funny?

    4. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Only lets you do things with her approval
      You mean like "su" to install anything?

      - Requires money once in a while to 'upgrade' her features
      Like the free service packs and power toys?

      - Doesn't allow you to even think about seeing anyone else besides her
      You've never seen a dual boot Linux and Windows machine?

    5. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by mefus · · Score: 1

      - Only lets you do things with her approval
      You mean like "su" to install anything?


      su is an order, an override.

      - Requires money once in a while to 'upgrade' her features
      Like the free service packs and power toys?


      No, shelling out dough as the only access to important security updates, or having to pay for upgrades was implied.

      - Doesn't allow you to even think about seeing anyone else besides her
      You've never seen a dual boot Linux and Windows machine?


      Not where windows was installed after Linux.

      --
      mefus
      In Open Society, GPL Software frees YOU!
    6. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by megarich · · Score: 1

      When you think about it windows is like a real woman, always trying to suck you dry of your time/money and always causing you grief anyway she can.

      I'm starting to believe too my machine gets moody about once a month....

    7. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Only lets you do things with her approval
      You mean like "su" to install anything?

      su is an order, an override.


      And you assume you always have access to root?

      - Requires money once in a while to 'upgrade' her features
      Like the free service packs and power toys?

      No, shelling out dough as the only access to important security updates, or having to pay for upgrades was implied.


      Dunno what world you live in but I haven't had to pay for any Windows "important security updates".

      - Doesn't allow you to even think about seeing anyone else besides her
      You've never seen a dual boot Linux and Windows machine?

      Not where windows was installed after Linux.


      Haven't been around much, have you?

    8. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by Hanji · · Score: 1
      Not where windows was installed after Linux.


      Well ... I'm currently running one.
      Of course, in order to get grub back on there after Windows trashed the MBR with its bootloader, I had to boot into Knoppix live-CD, mount my Debian partition (with -o dev), chroot in and install grub, and then manually set up menu.lst ...

      But it can be done :)
      --
      A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    9. Re:Why shouldn't it sound like a breakup letter? by mefus · · Score: 1

      Ok I understand that but, nevertheless, windows trashed your boot record. That's not nice.

      --
      mefus
      In Open Society, GPL Software frees YOU!
  21. Wait, lemme guess... by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Slashdotted before the first comment again?

    Here's a crazy idea. Maybe Slashdot itself needs a caching system. If linking to an article, the default could be to make a cache and link to that.

    I know everyone is proud of the Slashdot effect, but shouldn't it be more of an embarrassment than a point of pride?

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    1. Re:Wait, lemme guess... by wikdwarlock · · Score: 0

      This must be your first day here, right?

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
    2. Re:Wait, lemme guess... by Talian · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:Wait, lemme guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you always come up with these brand new fresh ideas? You're quite an innovator!

  22. Re:Dear Microsoft Windows by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Funny

    You spoofing bastard!

    Will the real CmdrTaco please that up?

    Mr. Torvalds

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  23. Right on! by tgd · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's a bit strange, but finally more people are starting to see the light and moving away from Windows.

    Yeah, because everything you see written on the Internet can be extrapolated into assumptions about the general population.

    And you thought goatse was just one freaky guy...

  24. voted for deletion by clarkie.mg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    we should have a "voting for deletion" feature in /.

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
    1. Re:voted for deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to burn your karma, clarkie.

  25. Jonesing on XP by erick99 · · Score: 1

    Dear Windows, I suspect we are in a co-dependent relationship. I feel obliged to continue. I have enabled M$ with my money and Windows has me addicted to the lazy way of computing. So, I am Jonesing on XP. It's not so bad - as long as I use a clean syringe for each reboot.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  26. So... by tunabomber · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was Windows cheating on him and allowing some script kiddie to access its private parts or something?

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:So... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, you can summarize as follows:

      "It's not you.. It's me... I'm gay, and I've been hiding it too long. Time to buy a Mac."

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:So... by AxB_teeth · · Score: 1

      > ... allowing some script kiddie to access its private parts ...

      Private "ports" maybe.

      JOCULARITY!

      --

      However,
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats only the tip of the iceberg. She even allowed some guys to probe on her 'backdoor', and even worse, she allowed them in. What would you like if your woman had tens or hundreds of geekish guys going into her 'backdoor' daily?

    4. Re:So... by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      Yes, it allowed acces to his bank account, social security number and credit cards....

      They called it ease of use... I call it ease of abuse!

      --
      Your Average Joe
  27. Dear Windows by jstrain · · Score: 0

    Please don't succomb to a slashdotting. Never mind...

    1. Re:Dear Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shit, no wonder it couldn't handle the traffic, the web server is running Apache on Linux... Damn, there goes my uninformed zealot rant.

      Ya know, you could have checked before making an ass out of yourself.

    2. Re:Dear Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does everyone asume that because this article was slashdotted that it must be running on a windows server? Am I to assume that every time I click on a link on slashdot and the server times out that it is always windows? Has a linux server never been slashdotted?

    3. Re:Dear Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did notice that xyzcomputing.com has no record of any uptime. Maybe if they plugged in the Ethernet cable....

  28. Dear Windows... by scowling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You let me run the games I want to play, the industry-standard word processing and publishing software I need to use in my job, and haven't crashed on me in months. While your security is questionable, at least I know that there is some accountability in your design.

    I'll be home by 5.

    --
    www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
  29. Reminds me... by SimianOverlord · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of a readers letter I really enjoyed from The Register UK IT mag. It was an answer to an article about Microsoft saying basically they get too much stick. Managed to track it down via Google: Enjoy, if it's your thing.

    ..

    "Microsoft simply makes some fairly mediocre software and charges a lot for it."

    No.

    Microsoft deliberately designs software that is inherently insecure and refuses to fix the fundamental design flaws no matter how bad the outcome is.

    When Microsoft merged IE and the desktop, almost ten years ago now, I immediately acted to get IE and Outlook banned at work. Why? Because using the same APIs to operate on trusted (local) and untrusted (email, internet) objects makes every program that uses those APIs responsible for determining, independently, whether an object is trusted or not.

    I and every security administrator I knew wrote Microsoft telling them this was a horrible idea. Nothing. They ignored the security community and went on to actually build IE in to the next release of Windows so you couldn't leave it out, as part of their game-plan to try and outflank the DoJ.

    I didn't know what the result would be, but I knew it would be bad. I did what I could to discourage our users from running IE and Outlook, and waited.

    We didn't have long to wait.

    When the Melissa virus showed up, I thought, "OK, this should let them know they've got a problem. They'll pull out IE and settle, and we'll be able to secure Windows again". Boy, was I naive.

    Here we are, it's 2004 instead of 1996, and there are still weekly exploits found in IE, Outlook, Windows Media Player, programs that use the MSHTML control. Get rid of that and you'd cut the virus problem by a factor of 10 or 100. 90-99% of the time spent fighting and cleaning up after viruses should be billed directly to Redmond, and because they did it to illegally avoid complying with the agreement they had with the DoJ, there should be criminal charges on top of that.

    Microsoft doesn't merely charge a lot for mediocre software, they deliberately and knowingly force people to chew up lifetimes fighting a problem that should not exist, and they do it to win a little extra market share for a secondary product that they don't even charge money for.

    --
    Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    1. Re:Reminds me... by oGMo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Microsoft deliberately designs software that is inherently insecure and refuses to fix the fundamental design flaws no matter how bad the outcome is.
      Hanlon's Razor:
      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained
      by stupidity.

      Personally I think Microsoft as a whole is just so incompetant they simply can't pull it off. Business policies, marketting, etc. all come together to make certain things more important than others, and a mindset of "just getting things done" versus "doing things right from the start" roll into the mediocre Microsoft mess we see today.

      Unfortunately for them, to fix this, they can't just change a few lines of code. It requires a complete overhaul of the entire corporate culture in all respects. Doing that with a company the size of Microsoft would be pretty tough, especially with a mindset that tells them such things are unneccessary!

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    2. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I certainly agree and I think in some ways there is another side which is an attempt to ensure that the Net is the source of all trouble so people will willingly give up what is already there and working for some other crap that is controlled by Redmond. MS has lagged on the Internet from day one because that's unix land and they don't want to go there till they control it.

    3. Re:Reminds me... by mkro · · Score: 4, Interesting
      When Microsoft merged IE and the desktop, almost ten years ago now, I immediately acted to get IE and Outlook banned at work. Why? Because using the same APIs to operate on trusted (local) and untrusted (email, internet) objects makes every program that uses those APIs responsible for determining, independently, whether an object is trusted or not.
      Isn't this the exact same thing KDE is going through now? Konqueror is a file- and webbrowser, and functions within each KDE program can be accessed using DCOP. E.g. Kopete reports an IM contact's online presence to KAdressbook, right-click a file in Konqueror and you can send it to everyone present in Kopete, etc, etc. Do anyone know if the KDE developers has taken special considerations to avoid doing the same mistakes MS did?
      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    4. Re:Reminds me... by zerojoker · · Score: 3, Funny

      of a nice joke about this issue in a PC Mag at that time:

      McD Guy: A Big Mac and a Coke. That's 6,99
      Bill G: I have just ordered a Big Mac
      McD Guy: The Coke belongs to this. It's part of the whole package
      Bill G: What? I won't pay the Coke!
      McD Guy: You don't need to. The Coke is free!
      Bill G: But the Big Mac alone was 3,99 before this?
      McD Guy: Thats right, but the Big Mac has new features now. It has a Coke included!
      Bill G: I have just drunk a Coke. I don't need another!
      McD Guy: Then you won't have a Big Mac!
      Bill G: Ok, I'll pay 3,99 and won't take the Coke!
      McD Guy: You can't separate parts of the whole package! Big Mac and Coke are integrated seamlessly!
      Bill G: That's bullshit! Big Mac and Coke are two independent things!
      McD Guy: Let me show you something! (dips the Big Mac in the Coke)
      Bill G: What's that suppose to mean?
      McD Guy: That's in the interest of our customers! That's how we can guarantee the same taste in all of our products!

    5. Re:Reminds me... by HoaryCripple · · Score: 1

      It is not in the best interest of Microsoft to fix anything. By leaving things insecure, and broken they can charge for incremental upgrades. Their business plan has worked for years, and there's no real sign of it failing now. This is not approval of the Win OS or Microsoft business practices. I'm just saying it's designed to make Microsoft as much money as possible. And by no means is the company stupid. You don't get a 299.87 billion dollar market cap by being stupid. You do it by being ruthless.

    6. Re:Reminds me... by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is *potential* for great security risks when you do something like this, but there are different ways to do it, some more secure than others (sandboxing, for example).

      The KDE developers have chosen a much better security model for integration. Microsoft did, in fact, implement some basic security measures, but they just left holes a mile wide, that's all.

    7. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not sure that making mistakes is neccesarily the problem. Granted that MS has done such fundamentally stupid things, that it almost boggles the mind how they got as far as they did. The thing about KDE is that if there is a mistake it will be fixed. If 50% of the linux community said they wanted the ability to rip Konqeror out of the system the KDE team would probably do it. Most problems are fixed quite quickly, within days to weeks, not months.

    8. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the way I see it is that:

      MS does not excell at doing OSes, they are super good for marketing/business. So yes, they are good but not for OSes. Not for GUIs (that's Apple).

    9. Re:Reminds me... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • When Microsoft merged IE and the desktop, almost ten years ago now, I immediately acted to get IE and Outlook banned at work. Why? Because using the same APIs to operate on trusted (local) and untrusted (email, internet) objects makes every program that uses those APIs responsible for determining, independently, whether an object is trusted or not.


      • I and every security administrator I knew wrote Microsoft telling them this was a horrible idea. Nothing. They ignored the security community and went on to actually build IE in to the next release of Windows so you couldn't leave it out, as part of their game-plan to try and outflank the DoJ.

        I didn't know what the result would be, but I knew it would be bad. I did what I could to discourage our users from running IE and Outlook, and waited.

        We didn't have long to wait.

        When the Melissa virus showed up, I thought, "OK, this should let them know they've got a problem. They'll pull out IE and settle, and we'll be able to secure Windows again". Boy, was I naive.

        Here we are, it's 2004 instead of 1996, and there are still weekly exploits found in IE, Outlook, Windows Media Player, programs that use the MSHTML control. Get rid of that and you'd cut the virus problem by a factor of 10 or 100. 90-99% of the time spent fighting and cleaning up after viruses should be billed directly to Redmond, and because they did it to illegally avoid complying with the agreement they had with the DoJ, there should be criminal charges on top of that.

        Microsoft doesn't merely charge a lot for mediocre software, they deliberately and knowingly force people to chew up lifetimes fighting a problem that should not exist, and they do it to win a little extra market share for a secondary product that they don't even charge money for.


      You don't get it, users (myself included!) LIKE having IE integrated, it is incredibly convienent. Windowkey-E, Shift-Tab, Space, Shift-Tab, enter URL, hit enter.

      Starting up a browser seems so incredibly lame, especially with always on broadband internet. Once the browser is integrated into the OS, if I need to look something up, it takes a matter of seconds, NONE of which are spent waiting for the browser to load.

      Firefox is honestly a superior browser, and I'd use it, if it integrated with my OS.
    10. Re:Reminds me... by leperkuhn · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is not a company out to make a great os, or change the world. they are out to make a shitload of money. and they seem to be doing a great job of it. if Bill could take a crap on your computer and you'd pay him for it, he would do that too.

      --
      http://www.rustyrazorblade.com
    11. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you don't have to start Firefox more than once, right? Just leave the thing running!

      Also, binding WIn-E to Firefox might be more complicated, but I'm sure it can be done.

    12. Re:Reminds me... by jayratch · · Score: 1
      Firefox is honestly a superior browser, and I'd use it, if it integrated with my OS.

      Isn't that right there the whole crux of the old bundling argument?

      I switched to Firefox when I realized it's actually faster than IE.. on a Celeron that makes a big difference... and I haven't had to look back since. I keep a windows open all the time, and with the use of Tabs I no longer have the taskbar clutter IE used to give me. I can't think of any better features than losing support for popups and ActiveX, though... I always thought feature-delete was the killer program for open source, and it's only in a strange sense here.

      I did notice one benefit to IE: It seems fond of mangled HTML, and switching to FF forced me to fix a few old errors on a few of my web pages. Bother.

    13. Re:Reminds me... by uvatbc · · Score: 1

      So to paraphrase :
      "The superficial design flaws completely hide the fundamental design flaws"

      ... with apologies to Dogbert

    14. Re:Reminds me... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      The thing about KDE is that if there is a mistake it will be fixed.


      Few years ago a security-hole was discovered in Konqueror. In fact, the same hole was discovered in Windows as well, by the same people. They announced both holes in the same time. How fast were patches available from KDE-folks and Microsoft after the announcement of the hole?

      KDE: 2 hours
      Microsoft: about 30 days
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    15. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Testing done by both sides?

      KDE: None, beyond "It compiles and works on my system".
      Microsoft: Extensive testing on a wide variety of systems and configurations to ensure nothing, or at most very little, breaks.

      There're two ways to look at everything.

  30. Dear Windows by multiplexo · · Score: 1
    ...I also couldn't take the way that you couldn't handle the traffic from /. readers when I posted one of my rants on the web. The whole point of posting these rants was to get noticed, but I couldn't do that since you were so easily slashdotted.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  31. Co-dependency... by the_rajah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm trying hard to break the relatioship off, but here at work there are those pesky old DOS programs that I still need to cross-assemble 8085 code for legacy hardware that still has useable life in it and old DOS based schematic programs that generated the drawings for that hardware back in the 80's. Oh and then there's the in-circuit emulators from the 80's that run with DOS interfaces. {{sigh}} At least I can go home at night to my own computer that runs SeSE 9.1, my new true-love. Shhh, don't say anything to my office Windows machine, though. It hasn't yet figured out that it's been dual booted.

    The author is a lucky guy that he was able to get out of that abusive relationship.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Co-dependency... by aero6dof · · Score: 1

      ... I still need to cross-assemble 8085 code for legacy hardware that still has useable life in it and old DOS based schematic programs that generated the drawings for that hardware back in the 80's.

      Hav you tried dosbox or dosemu?

    2. Re:Co-dependency... by yamla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you looked at dosbox or dosemu under Linux? I've had better luck with them than trying to run DOS programs in more recent versions of Windows. YMMV, of course.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    3. Re:Co-dependency... by Benanov · · Score: 1

      You could also try FreeDOS. If you have a spare machine you can set aside you can run FreeDOS as the only OS (or you could buy a new Dell :) My dumpster-diving friends and I have a few 'compatibility machines' set aside for such tasks that we've pulled out of the trash.

    4. Re:Co-dependency... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because windows xp/2000/NT can run DOS programs with 0 problems.

    5. Re:Co-dependency... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why aren't you running those dos programs in an emulator on linux? Or, god forbid, in a virtual machine. The PC is pretty well-emulated in terms of running DOS programs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  32. You know .... by dep01 · · Score: 1

    You know you've written something GOLD when someone else finds it and submits it to slashdot... Ahh, to be among the web gods...

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  33. Can't get to site by UrgleHoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems to be /.ed

    But I'm making the change at home. I have a family, so I have to consider non-geek computer needs. I've ordered the imac G5.

    Now, for the mac users out there, what would you use in place of virtualpc?

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    1. Re:Can't get to site by kylector · · Score: 1

      I believe there is a port of Wine for MacOS X. What do you need virtual pc for, anyway? Replace all that old software if you're taking the plunge. Are you just trying to run office? Much better alternatives than VPC (such as office mac or AbiWord, OO.org, etc). Are you trying to run some obscure app only for Windows? You'd be surprised--there's probably a port or clone of it for MacOS X or at least in linux land somewhere, and you can probably run it using Apple's X11. Get Fink Commander, it will help you with many X11 related pieces of software.

    2. Re:Can't get to site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, for the mac users out there, what would you use in place of virtualpc?

      Virtual PC.

    3. Re:Can't get to site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd use VirtualPC of course, why not use VPC?

    4. Re:Can't get to site by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      I don't need MS Office, already use OO at home and when I need to document on linux, and I'm looking forward to perusing AppleWorks. Last time I used appleworks was on my IIe near couple of decades ago.

      What would be incredibly useful would be to run visio and run the old dos game (Which I guess should be adequate with emulation) when I have the time (which is rarely). To digress, I hate visio, but it has become a staple for design. I'd like to see more effort put into projects like argouml, and I'm reading up on the project to see if there is something I can do to help, but I need something now.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    5. Re:Can't get to site by mreed911 · · Score: 1

      Nothing. I have my mac, and I use OpenOffice. I've not found *anything* productivity related on the PC that I can't get on the Mac.

      I'd love to write this letter to Windows, but unfortunately the people who make the decision to *buy* my software are so infatuated with her than they'd never consider leaving...

    6. Re:Can't get to site by Darktan · · Score: 1

      I actually use VirtualPC, or at least i did for a while. I find now that I rarely start it up, except for Microstation.

    7. Re:Can't get to site by kylector · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out OmniGraffle from the OmniGroup. If you're looking for good Visio compatibility you'll probably want the pro version. I have the "regular" version (came with my PowerMac G5) and I think it's a great program.

    8. Re:Can't get to site by justMichael · · Score: 2, Informative

      If all you want is a Visio like app and you don't need to share it with Visio, have a look at OmniGraffle.

      If you must use Visio I would suggest putting your Windows box in a closet someplace, only fire it up when you need it and use Remote Desktop to connect.

      I use both methods only because VPC is easier with multiple OS installs and when I'm on the road I can still test. VPC is a dog, Remote Desktop is actually not bad if you don't mind having the extra box around.

    9. Re:Can't get to site by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link! Prices look very reasonable too.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    10. Re:Can't get to site by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I bought my Dad an entry level Mac (an eMac) for his birthday, as his old machine was desperately slow.

      I'm very impressed with the eMac. It not only offers ease of use and an interface that makes Windows XP look amateurish, but a powerful *BSD OS underneath (when I recently stayed at my Dad's I could continue my development project as if I was using my home Linux system).

      For home office use, you'll probably find AppleWorks (supplied with a new Mac) is sufficient. It can read (and write) MS Office files just fine. I've not had the urge to run a PC emulator on the Mac - it's just not proven necessary. A new Mac comes with virtually everything a home user would need pre-installed. The only thing I found a bit lacking was QuickTime - it doesn't play all the video formats that I needed, but that was easily fixed by downloading VLC for OS X. There's a lot of good open source software available for OS X.

    11. Re:Can't get to site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Now, for the mac users out there, what would you use in place of virtualpc?

      Your macintosh.

    12. Re:Can't get to site by Fancia · · Score: 1

      DOSBox runs many DOS games very well, in my experience, and it's both free and has a nice Mac port. You can give the Windows port a try, first, if you want to see if the games you want to play run properly, or look it up in their reasonably exhaustive compatility list.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    13. Re:Can't get to site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta go Anonymous because my account, ZackSchil, was wrongfully nailed for bad posting. But the admins here don't care. I just get a cut and pasted response when I email them. THERE ARE NO BAD POSTS!!!

      Anyway... back on topic, there is a new PC emulator called QEMU. Download it here. It's pretty tough to setup and use but this thread should help. Also read the documentation. I managed to get it to boot XP and even get on the internet. It's slow so I'd use Win 95 or Win 98 in real world situations. To transfer files, you can simply mount the images QEMU uses in the Mac OS X Finder and toss files in.

    14. Re:Can't get to site by iroll · · Score: 1

      ...and AppleWorks hasn't changed much since then.

      Seriously, I bought a G4 iBook about 6 months ago, and I was same as you in this respect (figured Appleworks would be sufficient); it's ok for writing letters, but it's definitely NOT a feature-rich suite... it doesn't even do widow/orphan control in documents.

      I love my iBook, but Apple could probably let AppleWorks die without a major cry from the population... maybe they could just help OO.org open AppleWorks files easily, and be done with it.

      P.S. If you didn't do it in your order, bump the memory up in that iMac when you get it--it is money very, very well spent. I wish Apple would include more memory in their base models; they really fly with 512+ and could lure a lot more customers in... how disappointing is it to demo Tony Hawk at the computer store, and have the framerate suck? (maybe this was more of an issue for the G4s, but hey...) Anyways... CompUSA will do it for half (or less) than the price at the Apple Store, and I have been extremely pleased with the performance of my iBook since I bumped the paltry 256 up to 640MB.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    15. Re:Can't get to site by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      I totally agree about memory. I ordered it with the discount on final cut express, which requires 512Mb, so I'm going to order a 1Gb DIMM when the system ships (looking at a 4 week wait) to replace the 256MB module. One of my coworkers is a hardware geek, he strongly recommends crucial for their quality and service.

      I've read that memory throughput is better when paired with identical memory, so I'm curious if the performance would be better with just the one 1Gb DIMM over the 1Gb and 256Mb DIMMs filling both slots.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  34. Wrong moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be -1 redundant.

    1. Re:Wrong moderation by julesh · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Redundant? I don't see any other posts saying the same thing. While I don't agree with 'troll', it's clearly not 'reduntant' or 'offtopic'. 'Overrated', if you must mod it down, although I'd be inclined to just leave it, if I ever got mod points these days.

    2. Re:Wrong moderation by julesh · · Score: 1

      Is moderating my post about the misapplication of "redundant" as "redundant" supposed to be some kind of irony. It is _clearly_ offtopic.

      (Goodbye, karma.)

  35. Drivers are why I stay with Windows by tepples · · Score: 1

    If a fellow doesn't know how to drive, and he depends on his GF as a driver, then how could he continue to get around after breaking up with his GF?

    1. Re:Drivers are why I stay with Windows by Spetiam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...then how could he continue to get around after breaking up with his GF?

      Good point. I have yet to use a telephone modem while operating Linux. Other than the telephone modem, though, all my other hardware works great...except my scanner, but the Windows drivers and software are just as crappy.

      I'd have to say, though, the single most important feature that influenced me to make the switch to Linux is that I can obtain and use everything for free (while also avoiding unethical/criminal activity).

      If I had money to burn, I'd probably still be with Windows. Now that I've made the switch, though, I'm happy with Linux (SuSE 9.1 and trying out Ubuntu).

    2. Re:Drivers are why I stay with Windows by julesh · · Score: 1

      If a fellow doesn't know how to drive, and he depends on his GF as a driver, then how could he continue to get around after breaking up with his GF?

      To be fair, you'll have to acknowledge that the problem could be fixed by him getting a car that was easier to drive, although maybe not quite as fast, and possibly a tiny amount more expensive.

    3. Re:Drivers are why I stay with Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um . . . what?

    4. Re:Drivers are why I stay with Windows by drivers · · Score: 1

      I'm flattered but you don't need to stay with Windows just because of me.

    5. Re:Drivers are why I stay with Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually a good point. He can't figure out how to avoid spyware but finds Linux easy to use? I find that very difficult to believe. I use both Windows and Linux and I don't get spyware or viruses on either machine. A little knowledge goes a long way.

    6. Re:Drivers are why I stay with Windows by tepples · · Score: 1

      Hardware needs drivers or it's worthless. Linux lacks drivers; many of the devices I own are listed as "unsupported" in red letters on a site tracking drivers for that type of device. Find me the Linux driver for a Microtek Scanmaker 4850 scanner and I'll think seriously about switching.

  36. hmmm... by 5m477m4n · · Score: 0

    My only hope is he was trying to be +5 funny. Otherwise it sounds -5 loser... He's either got a good sense of humor, or needs to get out more.

    --

    ---
    Those who can, do
    Those who can't, teach
    Those who don't know how, supervise
  37. Dear Slashdot by NoInfo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In retrospect, this letter should be of no surprise to you. For years now I have stood by you despite the terrible things you have said about Microsoft. We have always managed to work through our serious problems but too many things have been swept under the table. I do not think I can stand (idly) by you any longer.

    What's that? No, another DOOM3 review will not help, not this time.

    I remember when we met, a warm April day, in 1999. For years I had been hearing about you, about your terrible green HTML of death, Open Source advocation, poor social skills, web server obliteration, and problems raising money... I had seen you here and there, but it was not until that fateful day, April 6, that our relationship became serious. I was almost knocked off my feet when I first saw you. Right then I knew it, you had to be mine. Who else could offer me what you could? I wanted, no, I needed, your Cowboy Neal polls, your Insightful comments, your great techno music...

    As time progressed so did my needs. Our affair took its next serious step on August 24, 2001. At the time I thought our happiness would never end. You brought me places I never thought possible. How could I refuse your IOCCC results or your Napster articles? I mean, you gave up your best friend, financial independence, so our relationship could progress unhindered with OSDN. It hurts me to look back at us, two starry-eyed lovers wanting nothing more than each other's first posts.

    Well, like I wrote, I have reached my limit. Its going to take more than mod points to fix our relationship. I just don't feel like I know you anymore. For example, do you know what I found on the site a few days ago? A dupe! I wonder who let that in...

    Slashdot, I know you will try to change, but I have been hurt too many times. You should know that I have been seeing someone else for a few months now. She is fun, easy going, and will do something for me that you never even considered, oust the president.

    I don't know what else to say- we had a good run, but now its over. Pack up your Beowulf cluster, your SCO stories, hell, take slashcode if you have to. I am sure we'll see each other from time to time but I know one thing, I'll never again have to depend on you.

    Yours no longer,
    N I

    1. Re:Dear Slashdot by bteeter · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points, but damn it, that is funny. Therefore:

      +1 Funny

      Take care,

      Brian
      --
      Linux Web Hosting

    2. Re:Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is fun [moveon.org]

      fucking brilliant!

      good job (and spot on)!

  38. I'm sorry by numbware · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows, I'm sorry about my affair with Linux. If it will make you happy... I wasn't root. You know I'm your only admin. What? Everyone you know is your admin? By default? What are you, some kind of whore?! This is over! (Stomps out of room crying).

    --
    I'm going to go create my own technology news site, with blackjack and hookers. You know what? Forget the news site.
  39. Damn, that was my first wife to a "T"... by the_rajah · · Score: 3, Funny

    except it only took one STD from her to call it quits.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  40. Spyware... by Ogrez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For example, do you know what I found on the computer a few days ago? Spyware! I wonder who let that in...

    You did... surfing porn sites and clicking YES on every popup asking you if you wanted to install gain/gator/cometcursor/mysearch...

    You can blame IE, you can blame Microsoft... but in the end... the real admins know... BLAME THE USERS!!!

    --


    Fire in the hands of the village idiot is no tool, but a weapon of mass destruction
    1. Re:Spyware... by Soko · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. I do not blame the luser.

      Any competent Systems Administrator knows that lusers lack any real clue what-so-ever, and therefore cannot be trusted with dangerous system level tools. If there is no Sysadmin that will be present, there should be no such tools within a 5 mile radius of any given luser.

      I blame Microsoft for providing a toolkit that makes my lusers able to mess up my systems before I can LART them dead in thier tracks.

      Oh, fsck, another one looking to see what this JPEG exploit code looks like. *Clickety-Click*

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Spyware... by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      Insightful instead of funny? Moderators on crack, again..

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    3. Re:Spyware... by i_r_sensitive · · Score: 1
      Or maybe he just looked at a jpeg...

      Your premise is true, so long as we aren't talking about Windows...

      Take my SO, for example. I recently nuked her Windows and put her on Debian. Got everything nicely set-up and locked down and turned it over to her.

      Since that time, no problems, no issues, joy and bliss. The only time Windows runs in the house now is when I'm playing games, and thanks to Transgaming, not even as much any more.

      We *can* blame Microsoft, and IE. Linus and gang built in to Linux the ability for real admins to control their users within the OS, without having only education as the sole recourse...

      So, real admins know... ...don't blame your users for what your vendor forgot in the first place.

      --
      "Talk minus action equals nothing" - Joey Shithead, D.O.A.
      "Talk minus action equals /." -
    4. Re:Spyware... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because nobody would ever use any of the well known IE exploits to make a website do something without telling the user about it. That would never happen. People dumb enough to browse the net using IE should expect that looking at a JPEG image file will result in a compramised system. Yeah, that's perfectly reasonable.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    5. Re:Spyware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is called blaming the victim. being ignorant is not a crime!

    6. Re:Spyware... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Not all spyware has to be initiated by the user.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    7. Re:Spyware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that you don't have to click "Yes" to get infected by many exploits in IE. Shit, now you can just browse to a site with an infected JPEG!

  41. People *are* moving away from Windows. . . by Sialagogue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just last week I read an article where Microsoft's consumer OS market share has been continually dropping -- down from from a 6 year high of 108 percent to 105 percent just last quarter.

    The Microsoft rep that lives under the sink in my kitchen was quick to strike back, however, telling me that the drop came only as a result of survey companies no longer screening for "dirtbag hippies and Communists."

    I'm hopeful.

    --
    The only acceptable defense of scientific results is to say that they were the product of the Scientific Method.
    1. Re:People *are* moving away from Windows. . . by Skiron · · Score: 1

      But, as said, re Microsoft Studies, an independent consultant is somebody you pay a lot of money to, to agree with your views.

    2. Re:People *are* moving away from Windows. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      108 percent? 105 percent? You mean that when some people move away from Windows, there are 8% more computers lurking around somewhere that will jump out of the shadows and attack?

  42. linuxxx by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 2, Funny

    She is fun, easy going, and will do something for me that you never even considered, share her source code.

    hmm so afterall linux is a she :p

  43. Paperclip response XP by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey (*dink* *dink*), it looks like you're trying to write a letter....... [Help me] [No thanks]

    (click "No thanks")

    Okay, you don't want my help! Should I close?

    (click "yes")

    Okay, I'll close. Bye! Shall I do a little dance as I go?

    (click "Hell, no")

    Come on, I love dancing! Pleeease?

    (click "Do you want to find out how many times you can bend a paper clip out of shape before it snaps?")

    Hmm, you make a persuasive argument. I think I'll just close now.

    1. Re:Paperclip response XP by outanowhere · · Score: 1

      Wish there was a chaingun cursor to deal with that buttinsky paperclip and it's friends.

  44. Did anyone else cry when reading that? by soybean · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm a little emotional, but seriously, that was sad. :(

  45. Dear Windows by Eudial · · Score: 0

    I can't take it any more, you've ruined my life,
    therefore i've decided to ... ?

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  46. sigh by dioscaido · · Score: 1

    How to write an anti-MS manifesto a) critique features long since fixed/patched (blue screens, constant reboots, security vulnerabilities) b) attribute your inability to set up windows correctly to a fundamental flaw in Windows (i.e. - You can't bother to remove your user account from the Administrator group, but still whine when you get spyware) There are great reasons to use Linux over Windows. The anti-M$ crowd really needs to lay off the innacuracies or misrepresentations.

    1. Re:sigh by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

      You can still BSOD an XP computer. Seen it done myself. (I think it was due to a bad video driver and an ooooolllllllddddd card).

      --
      Stop signs are only Suggestions
  47. Moving to Apple ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check out the amazon computer top sellers - 8 out of the top 10 are Macs. I was pretty surprised to see this a few days ago, and it's been like this since then. The new iMac is a hit, and that's no surprise - look at what the x86 competition is offering - an iMac look alike, priced about the same. Seems nice from this angle, but then look at it from the side. Bulk.

    1. Re:Moving to Apple ! by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Who buys a computer from Amazon??? Probably the same people that buy computers from best buy. Yuck.

    2. Re:Moving to Apple ! by MBCook · · Score: 1
      My laptop is getting long in the tooth (it's about 3.5 yrs now). I'm going to replace it with a PowerBook as soon as I get out of school (which seems to go out of their way to require Windows). I know I could use VirtualPC, but this is just easier (and cheaper for now). But I'll be going back to Mac (after 10 years of Wintel). Better OS, nice hardware designs. A real shell (BASH). It's perfect.

      On a side note, I agree that that iMac wannabe is ugly. But yesterday I saw a new iMac in person for the first time. I think it was the smallest model. While it's thin (and amazing in that way), the size of the bezel at the bottom of the screen is HUGE at first. I'm sure I'd get used to it, but it just seemed so much smaller in the pictures. I'd imagine it wouldn't seem so bad with a large model. But I thought I'd post that observation. I'd still take it over that monstrosity you linked to. I've seen some nice all-in-ones, but whoever designed that needs to be stoned and sent back to design school.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Moving to Apple ! by 787style · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the bulkiness is the price you pay to get a real computer.

    4. Re:Moving to Apple ! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Because their prices for Apple are reasonable their prices for pc's are questionable.

    5. Re:Moving to Apple ! by tickticktickfast · · Score: 0

      so why doesn't it work out that way in this case ?

  48. Ugh by mlylecarlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dear Linus, Bob Young, Michael Cowpland, Patrick Volkerding (god it's like kissinger said about europe, I don't know who else to add)... *et all*,

    DVD ripping is too hard under linux. Make me some useable software and I will **** you instead of ****ing Bill Gates.

    Thank you,
    mlylecarlin

    1. Re:Ugh by iantri · · Score: 2, Informative
      Voila.

      dvd::rip

    2. Re:Ugh by shish · · Score: 1

      mencoder dvd://1 -o file.avi

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    3. Re:Ugh by Cytlid · · Score: 1

      Unless of course, you run gtk2 which isn't supported.

      --
      FLR
    4. Re:Ugh by iantri · · Score: 1

      The GTK 1 libraries are always included with Linux distributions (hell, the GIMP was GTK 1 until version 2).

  49. It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets face it. Most people stick with Windows because it's there and it takes effort to get something better. Get a major PC manufacturer to start shipping some dual boot systems and see how well it fares...

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  50. Loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, what a loser.... *continues reading /.*

  51. This is stupid... by phaetonic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work with UNIX full-time at work, specifically Solaris and HP-UX. I have been "driven up the wall" by the various errors Solaris and HP-UX have caused me, which includes not sleeping all night to fix a problem that I felt was a UNIX-only issue. I've also had problems with Windows, but I usually delegate the task of fixing Windows boxes to someone else. My poiint is every OS when used extensively can and will give you some pain. Sometimes I feel like the whole Windows vs. Linux thing is like the republicans versus the democrats.

    Just a rant with karma to burn..

    1. Re:This is stupid... by Ogun · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      I found a fast warez site: http://warez.it.kth.se
    2. Re:This is stupid... by Skiron · · Score: 1

      Totally disgree. We all get hassle, yes as Sysadmin, but that doesn't == home user should get them too with all the problems and holes that never seem to get fixed, or even more frightening open up more security issues.

    3. Re:This is stupid... by clamatius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Sometimes I feel like the whole Windows vs. Linux thing is like the republicans versus the democrats.

      I agree completely. One of them is obviously more evil than the other, but for some reason a whole lot of people don't seem to notice. :)

    4. Re:This is stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But home users should figure out how to deal with rc scripts? RPMs and tarballs? Compiling kernels and drivers? Yeah, I know you didn't say any of that. But Linux has a whole new set of problems (at least at the moment; It'd be nice if the Linux community addresses the problems) when used as a desktop.

    5. Re:This is stupid... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, I wouldn't really consider the Democrates "Obviously more evial" than the republicans, I mean they are very close and both cross the line back and forth on pretty much equal evilness.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:This is stupid... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Wow, compare Solaris and HP-UX - two proprietary operating systems - to Windows - another proprietary operating system and then draw conclusions about Linux. When you are "driven up the wall" about something on a Linux box, YOU CAN FIX IT. You can't do that with proprietary operating systems, STOP USING THEM.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:This is stupid... by fermion · · Score: 1
      You are absolutely correct. I have used many an OS and find that all them require much housekeeping, which necessarily reduces the amount of time that real work can get done. They all have subtle errors that make life more difficult that it has to be.

      I use macs. I spend much time maintaining them. These are not perfect machines, but i know how to keep them running, the updates tend to small and not too frequent. Most important the things I want to do are easily done.

      In most of my jobs I use MS Windows machines. In the spirit that free beer is the best beer, I have no issue with this. The computer is given to me. Someone else has the headache of maintaining it. Someone else has the headache of making sure all the software I need for work is installed. Frankly my job could set me up with a connection to a PDP and it would be the same difference.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:This is stupid... by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      > When you are "driven up the wall" about something on a Linux box, YOU CAN FIX IT.

      Point 1: Riiiight. Because as well as being a sys-admin, I'm adept in C, C++, Java, Objective C, perl, PHP, python, ruby, Glade, bash, and whatever the hell else OSS people use. I also have infinite time and perfect debugging tools. 140,000 lines of uncommented code written by an insane genius hell-bent on showing off how clever he is does not faze me at all.

      Point 2: The majority of problems we have as admins aren't really to do with the OS - we understand that fairly well, and all modern OSes are pretty stable and predictable. We tend to spend more time on problems caused by the way people want to use the applications we run - things like sendmail and Apache - tools we have the source for. We lose even more time tracking down problems caused by complex interactions between machines and the network, waiting for downtime windows, or for hardware vendors to replace components.

      The fact is that when a production system is acting funny under certain, hard to reproduce, conditions, having the source (usually) doesn't mean shit.

      In my whole life I have *once* fixed a problem by having access to the source. It was a bug in Apache 1.2, and about a day after I fixed it myself, a new release came out which didn't have the bug.

      On rare occasions having the source can be a godsend. In the real world it's better to get on with another task while someone else fixes their own code.

  52. Breaking up with the hot chick to date the nerd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like a /. reader...

    Breaking up with the full featured OS to hang out with guys trying to figure out your new love...

  53. my next computer will be a mac by m_dob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yup, after 10 years of puppy-like devotion to Microsoft, I've decided that Macs live up to their promises so much better than Windows PCs do. They have a modern, powerful operating system. I just don't get the same feeling using PCs.

    I have always looked out for quality - using Firefox at the moment, and it's come to the point where the Mac is the only quality package out there. I don't want to have to wait 3 years for another buggy OS.

    Sorry Microsoft. We had some good times.

    1. Re:my next computer will be a mac by GottaGettaLife · · Score: 1

      I finally had enough and I converted to Mac. I bought a 14" iBook and it's a slick piece of hardware. And Mac OSX is a pure joy to use. I'd never even used a Mac until this machine arrived at my doorstep. Hey Windows, buh-bye!

    2. Re:my next computer will be a mac by shish · · Score: 1
      We had some good times.

      Really?

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  54. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I *like* windows. I like the applications that are available for it, I like the snappiness of it, I like that everything works with it, and I like all the free software available for it ;). Sure, security is a problem, but for a home user if you just don't do stupid things (attachments) and take necessary precautions (AVG, Ad aware), then all is well.

    I'm not against Linux. I've played with it. But it's just too hard, too incompatible. I'm not against the Mac either, but it's too limited when it comes to some industry/profession specific software. I've also tried using Firefox, and just got frustrated when I would go to some sites that wouldn't work right. I know there's a plug-in to "open in IE" but come on. I tried OpenOffice, but it's slow and what's the point when Office is free anyway? I'm supposed to whip up a quick and simple database in MySQL or PostgresSQL? Yeah, right. Plus, I exchange documents with a lot of people, and I don't want them thinking I'm some crackpot by sending them stuff that just doesn't work right. (They have reason enough as it is.)

    Mind you, I'm just saying for me and my needs Windows works fine. Obviously, where security or reliability are more important, Linux or Mac would be the way to go.

  55. got mirror? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Server,

    Stop buckling under slashdot's load, you vacuum-tubed dented cow-boxed surplus wimp! I cannot read the damned link.

    Sincerely,
    Pissed slashdot user

  56. Dear slashdot... by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    I wish wish you wouldn't slashdot the articles.
    Thanks for your time slashdot.

  57. Dear Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I installed Mandrakelinux and my computer runs much faster and more secure than ever.

    Thanks for the constant patches/updates, crashes, spyware, malware, incompatibilities, viruses, trojans, worms, etc. I realise that I won't have to put up with them much anymore, but thanks anyway.

    Regards, greatscot

  58. My girlfriends are like Linux.... by DogDude · · Score: 3, Funny
    • Very high maintenance
    • Compicated
    • Very pretty, very cool
    • Expensive
    • You need a non-existent user manual just to get basic things done
    • Ultimately, not worth the trouble.
    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't even spell complicated.

      What's that say about you and your girlfriends

    2. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      It says that I have too much shit to do, and I shouldn't be posting to Slashdot if I don't even have time to check spelling.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by misleb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is Linux very pretty? Not unless you limit yourself to a small subset of applications that comply with your desktop environment.

      Windows is what I would call high maintainance... gotta keep the virus scanner, firewall, and spyware detection tools up to date. Gotta do periodic manual scans to make sure everything is clean. Reinstall periodically when things get clogged up. That is high maintainance.

      How is Linux expensive?

      The only way Linux is like the girlfriend I think you are describing is that it is complicated, needs manual to get basic things done, and perhaps not worth the trouble. I'm not sure your analogy works.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    4. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say your girlfriends are more like OS/2 Warp version 5 : Imaginary.

    5. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by J3r3miah · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these to make the ultimate girlfriend !

      --
      God is real unless declared as int
    6. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by fitten · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, my Windows boxes take about the same amount of maintenance as my Linux boxes. I run a firewall to protect them all and I keep them all up-to-date on patches. I've been connected via broadband now for 5 years and have had ZERO virii or worms on any of my machines. However, I *did* have my Linux box rooted once when I was using it as the firewall. I now have a dedicated firewall device.

    7. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by secolactico · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My girlfriends are like Linux...

      What, all of them?

      Here's an idea, try monogamy, then if you feel like multitasking, upgrade back to full blown polygamy.

      Now, I'll be the first to admin that I'm no Casanova, but in my experience, women want pretty much the same things men do. The only difference, is they are more subtle.

      --
      No sig
    8. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by misleb · · Score: 1
      I've been connected via broadband now for 5 years and have had ZERO virii or worms on any of my machines.

      This is probably because you employ and extra level of maintenance in the form of a virus scanner. What about spyware? Don't you have to take steps to maintain a spyware free system? Every Windows user I know does (or should). And if they don't, it isn't long before they become choked with the crap.

      However, I *did* have my Linux box rooted once when I was using it as the firewall. I now have a dedicated firewall device.

      I've had an OS X box and a Linux box on broadband for years turn on nearly 24/7/365 without a firewall, no virus scanner, and no spyware protection, lazy patch frequency, and no problems. Sure, I might be asking to be rooted eventually, but it hasn't happened yet. You simply can't do that with Windows. Without proper maintenance, a Windows box will be infected with SOMETHING in a matter of minutes... and rendered barely usable in a matter of months.

      Anyway, I'm not sure the analogy between a high maintenance girlfriend and Linux is accurate. By most accounts, Linux is more like that geeky, somewhat homely looking girlfriend, who is only compatable with a very small percent of the population. Complicated, mysterious, but very fun if you are into that kind of thing.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    9. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by Foolhardy · · Score: 1

      I've been running my Windows computers without a firewall (other than a NAT router), virus scanner, spyware protection, only patching at service packs without any problems. I've never had a worm, virus, trojan or other infection. I've never reinstalled Windows, and no, it doesn't get slow.

      How do I do it?
      1. I log on as a normal user (not admin). This is the single best defense against crapware. For installation and those whiney apps that require admin access, I use the Windows equivalent of sudo transparently to launch them. I also run IE and OE as a seperate limited user that doesn't have access to anything important (like documents).
      2. The NAT router protects me from all incoming worms/unsolicited traffic.
      3. I use Mozilla instead of IE.
      4. I know what I am doing: I don't run crapware/virus infected stuff.

      The first two items are sufficent to protect you from mostly everything. My brother got some crap installed; after cleaning it up, I instituted the first one and he has been clear ever since (more than a year).

    10. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, not worth the trouble.

      Hmm. Very odd. We seem to have a real do-it-yourselfer complaining about Linux.

    11. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've been connected via broadband now for 5 years and have had ZERO virii or worms on any of my machines."

      This is probably because you employ and extra level of maintenance in the form of a virus scanner. What about spyware? Don't you have to take steps to maintain a spyware free system? Every Windows user I know does (or should). And if they don't, it isn't long before they become choked with the crap.


      Not the OP, but I can make a similar claim. I do not run any antivirus software, nor do I have problems with spyware. My system has been up for more than 80 days now, so I'm obviously not up to date with patches.

      My precautions consist of:
      - a firewall (w/ NAT)
      - not using IE or Outlook
      - a deep understanding of the problem

      For others without the last, I've set up another machine that boots into a restricted user account and periodically (~2/3 months) log in as admin to visit windowsupdate. That took some time to set up, but the maintanence effort is low.

    12. Re:My girlfriends are like Linux.... by fitten · · Score: 1

      I've been connected via broadband now for 5 years and have had ZERO virii or worms on any of my machines.
      This is probably because you employ and extra level of maintenance in the form of a virus scanner. What about spyware? Don't you have to take steps to maintain a spyware free system? Every Windows user I know does (or should). And if they don't, it isn't long before they become choked with the crap.


      Nope, no virus scanners, spyware scanners, or anything like that.

      One of my Windows boxes runs 24/7/365 except for patches that require reboot or hardware installs/removals. One of my Linux boxes has the same policy as this.

      I don't use Outlook to read mail, I do use IE quite a bit on the Windows box but I don't click on every link I see. I'm careful about what I run and such. I don't open attachments sent to me via email unless I *know* (usually meaning that I expected the attachment and/or use the virus scanning that my email provider uses) that it is safe. The quickest way to get email to me from you deleted without being even read or downloaded is to send me an attachment of any kind that I didn't expect to receive.

      Basically, I just avoid doing stupid things.

  59. Taking credit? by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    Er. You taking credit for this?

    Um. Thank you for it. Sorry* we melted your webserver. I enjoyed it, but wouldn't read it twice. A clever idea, pulled off okay. Mostly harmless. ;-)

    *: in a kind-and-polite way. Not in a accepts-liability kinda way.

    take care.
    love ken.

    1. Re:Taking credit? by dep01 · · Score: 1

      Oh no, I'm not taking credit for this (I WISH I had that kind of free-time). Just an observation :)

      dep

      --
      "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  60. so predictable by farble1670 · · Score: 1
    gee let's post another predictable anti-ms article, and get lots of feedback that our anti-ms stance is valid and that we are right-thinking.

    folks who are truly interested in being informed do more than tune into things that validate their positions. i've been reading /. for about 2 months ... there is some good stuff, but the theme is always:
    • if it can be construed to be anti-linux, bash it
    • if it's in any way anti-oss, bash it
    • java? bash it
    • sunw? bash it
    • ibm? we love you.

    i compare this to right-wing AM radio. the topics are never focused around two-way discussion on issues. it's about getting confirmation of what you already believe.

    guess what? oss isn't the answer for everything. there are lots of good things about java. linux isn't for everyone. sunw isn't the devil. ibm is just trying to make $ like everyone else.
    1. Re:so predictable by Eloquence · · Score: 1
      oss isn't the answer for everything.

      It isn't the answer to getting laid, or to becoming a carpenter, or to learning to cook. But when it comes to software development, the OSS model is superior to any other, because it is a model of continued sharing, of accumulation of knowledge, that over time will produce products that are superior to anything else. That doesn't mean that it can't be optimized, i.e. the way money is put into open source projects by users, the way developers with shared interests find each other, the OSS development model itself all can be improved. But copyrighting programs and not sharing the source is simply a primitive, outdated development model, and it limits your personal freedoms.

      You can spend all day thinking about how horse-drawn carriages might be superior to cars after all, how your beliefs about cars might be arrogant, and so forth. But that would be a waste of time. It is useful to develop degrees of certainty about issues and prioritize your thinking time based on that. For example, thinking about how the Linux kernel development model can be improved is more useful than considering that copyright might not be such a bad idea after all, because the evidence that it is, is quite overwhelming.

  61. finally more people are starting to see the light? by Spydr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i don't think it's really a matter of people finally getting enough of windows... it's more like people finally have other viable options.

    i wouldn't have touched a mac even 2 years ago, but these days they are pretty damn slick.

    linux is also just getting to the point where 'normal' users can use it withough being complete overwhelmed (or even underwhelmed in some cases).

    good riddance, windows.

  62. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is a blond-haired blue eyed 9 year old kid, at least according to the superbowl commercial.

    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or "she" according to the catholic church.

    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really want to mod this funny, but I fear the metamod.

  63. Cache solution by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    I agree, slashdot's usefulness is limited by the slashdot effect.
    They could cache the page and leave the banner ads html in place- then send a notice to the site informing them they are in Slashdot's cache and if you wish to update your article at all here is a user ID and password to alter your cache- this admin account could also feature viewing statistics so that the website author could incorporate into his or her own and not have to worry about losing revenue.
    In reality, chances are Slashdot neither has the resources or the money to create this cache or hire people to maintain it.

    1. Re:Cache solution by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Right, if only there was already a premade solution. But, if there was, slashdot would certainly have already covered it.

  64. I'd like to make a Special Dedication.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Would you please play "You Keep Me Hanging On" (prferably the Kim Wilde version):

    Set me free, why don't you babe?
    get out my life, why don't you babe?
    'cause you don't really love me
    you just keep me hanging on
    Set me free, why don't you babe?
    get out my life, why don't you babe?
    'cause you don't really need me
    but you keep me hanging on
    Why do you keep a-comin' around
    playing with my heart
    why don't you get out of my life
    and let me make a brand new start
    let me get over you
    the way you've gotten over me, yeah
    Set me free, why don't you babe?
    get out my life, why don't you babe?
    'cause you don't really love me
    you just keep me hanging on
    now you don't really need me
    you just keep me hanging on
    You say although we broke
    you still just wanna be friends
    but how can we still be friends
    when seeing you only breaks my heart again
    and there ain't nothing I can do about it...
    Get out, get out of my life
    and let me sleep at night
    'cause you don't really love me
    you just keep me hanging on
    You say you still care for me
    but your heart and soul needs to be free
    now that you've got your freedom
    you wanna still hold on to me
    you don't want me for yourself
    so let me find somebody else
    Why don't you be a man about it and set me free
    now you don't care a thing about me
    you're just using me
    get out, get out of my life
    and let me sleep at night
    'cause you don't really love me
    you just keep me hanging on
    'Cause you don't really need me
    you just keep me hanging on

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  65. Reply to SC by dspasovski · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yours no longer,
    S C


    Dear S C,

    I didn't give a fuck about you anyway -- already took all your money AND made you look like an idiot - what woman can possibly want more?

    Sincerely,
    Ms. Windows

    1. Re:Reply to SC by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I know that strap-ons exist and their use is alive and well but anyone fucking you that much has got to be male.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Reply to SC by witte · · Score: 3, Funny



      "Oh, by the way... I faked all my blue screens !"

    3. Re:Reply to SC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the last time I drink blackcurrant squash in front of a monitor...

  66. You're smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish there were more smart people on the 'net.

  67. Dear John... by dfj225 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think his webserver just broke up with him :(

    --
    SIGFAULT
  68. No.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a whole shit-load of freaky fucknuts who keep posting that damn link again and again and again ... that and the "HEY EVERYBODY, I'M LOOKING AT GAY PORN!" link. Gotta love those fucknuts out there helping /.ers get fired the world over...

    1. Re:No.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should teach you for wasting company time browsing /.

  69. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by PriceIke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Lets face it. Most people stick with Windows because it's there and it takes effort to get something better

    Sounds eerily like the reason most people stay in the relationship they're in.

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  70. Dear Slashdot... by sebby1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You say you are the news for nerds, yet consantly post old news about the useless Windows vs Linux debate. I am a nerd and don't undertand you no more. How about changing the topic and talking about interesting news for once?

  71. Dear /. by arose · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please stop poking me, the effect is irritating.

    Anonymous Webserver.

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  72. Re:Dear Linux... by ewhac · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't that just like a man? Inattentive, unappreciative, selfish. Gawd, what was I thinking when I went home with you?

    Do you have even the slightest idea what I do for you, tirelessly, flawlessly, every day? No. You spend more time doting on your car than me. You've never even looked in /etc, have you? Oh, that's right, "I shouldn't have to think about that."

    And to think you'd begrudge me ten measly hours. Do you have any idea what those ten hours will pay you back down the road? Don't you understand that we're trying to build a relationship here? And that relationships require time and commitment? But no, your eyes keep drifting over to that cheap, heavily-made-up harlot from Washington, and thinking to yourself, "Things would be so much easier and more fun with her." Yeah, for a little while. But then the problems would start, and multiply quickly after that. And you know something? The problems you'd have with her would turn out, fundamentally, to be the same problems you say you're having with me. I proved this to you; did you think I was lying? At least I'm being honest with you, and making you aware up-front of what you're getting into, and the work you'll need to do.

    I may be cheap, but I'm not easy, buster. If you want something meaningful, something lasting, I'll always be willing to give that to you. Hell, I'll even dress up like that floozy Washington chick if you want. But you'd better be ready to get off your kiester and put in some effort. You may think I'm trying to emasculate you or humiliate you, but what I'm really asking you to do is become an adult. Otherwise, you're just going to go from disappointment to disappointment, and never understand why things keep falling apart.

    I'll always be there for you,
    Linnie

  73. BUT IT STILL BEATS SUCKING COCK FOR TUX by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    If your wife's a bitch, faggotry isn't the answer. You just beat her until she behaves.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  74. dear microsoft corp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You and your products totally suck.

    Linux is much better.

  75. No worry by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    I had thought I'd need to apologise for being rude about someone's creative works (or for voicing my opinion).

    Take care.
    ken.

    1. Re:No worry by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      No problem. If opinion's are like asses, /. is a nudist colony.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  76. SpaceCanary's server needs an obit by... by scupper · · Score: 1

    Paperclip

  77. Relationship between employment and MS Software by Zed2K · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I wonder how many of the MS whiners here would be unemployed if Microsoft wasn't around. I bet a huge chunk of you.

    1. Re:Relationship between employment and MS Software by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Why would you want a huge chunk of me? Do I get to pick the chunk?

  78. Bestseller? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Check out the amazon computer top sellers - 8 out of the top 10 are Macs.

    The PC market is fragmented amongst countless sellers and models; the Mac is sold by *one* manufacturer, comes in a decent, but not massive, range of models. So I'd say a given Mac stands a far better chance of being a bestseller than any given PC model.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  79. I don't get it... by Skim123 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Forbidden

    You don't have permission to access /index.php on this server.
    This guy's not very eloquent.
    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  80. Re:MOD PARENT UP! EXEMPLARY POST! HOLY FUCKING SHI by bairy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    actually, I think it was just a joke

    --


    Get paid to search..It's geniune and
  81. My complaint about Microsoft by jandamandotcom · · Score: 0, Troll

    While no statement I'm about to make should be construed as suggesting or recommending that any person commit an illegal act of any kind, you should realize that a true enemy is better than a false friend. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape Microsoft's deceitful, crass indoctrination and is consequently believable. Unless Microsoft should promote a culture of dependency and failure because "it's the right thing to do", it is simply wrong to conclude that disgusting, anal-retentive ruffians are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. It strikes me as amusing that Microsoft complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain. "Tolerance" means tolerance of all, not only of a select few. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that it spews out so many falsehoods, distortions, and half-truths, that rebuttal requires some lengthy documentation?

    Microsoft possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, it can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. Contrast, for example, Microsoft's inveracities with those of meddlesome hippies, and observe that there is no contrast. I, by (genuine) contrast, take the view that Microsoft wonders why everyone hates it. Apparently, it never stopped to think that maybe it's because I indisputably wouldn't want to scupper my initiative to reinforce notions of positive self esteem. I would, on the other hand, love to pronounce the truth and renounce the lies. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter.

    If I didn't think Microsoft would undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education, I wouldn't say that time cannot change its behavior. Time merely enlarges the field in which Microsoft can, with ever-increasing intensity and thoroughness, violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains. Microsoft keeps saying that it is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. For some reason, Microsoft's trained seals actually believe this nonsense. Microsoft dreams of a time when they'll be free to control, manipulate, and harm other people. That's the way it's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen -- not may happen, but will happen -- if we don't interfere, if we don't tell you things that it doesn't want you to know. To be blunt, many people respond to Microsoft's grotesque campaigns in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Microsoft-induced disaster.

    At the risk of repeating myself, I must reiterate that it's Microsoft's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to restructure the social, political, and economic relationships throughout the entire society. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such an illaudable idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that Microsoft can't fool me. I've met superstitious, pompous maggots before, so I know that while we do nothing, those who spit on sacred icons are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate. Yes, I realize that even the most rigorous theoretical framework Microsoft could put forward would not leave it in the position of generalizing with the certainty to which it is prone in its politics, but for the sake of brevity I've had to express myself in simplified terms. No one likes being attacked by the worst classes of neurotic, cranky urban guerrillas there are. Even worse, Microsoft exploits our fear of those attacks -- which it claims will evolve sooner or later into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks -- as a pretext to create a world without history, without philosophy, wit

    1. Re:My complaint about Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, aren't you just a self-righteous fuck! BTW, use of fancy words doesn't make you any more correct, just more elitist!!

    2. Re:My complaint about Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, MS loving fag. He does have a point (a first for a troll) that MS doesn't follow the law and can buy off anyone who can challenge them in court. Why should bug-ridden software cost hundreds of dollars? Gates said so. If they'd let people work on projects without Bill's cock up thier asses, things will get better. Look at Xbox.

    3. Re:My complaint about Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, yeah, I'm a MS loving fag. Wow, your cognitive abilities are amazing. BTW, I was most likely using Unix and FreeBSD/Linux before you were done learning how not to crap in your pants.

      The bottom line is if it wasn't MS, then Sun, IBM, Redhat or just about anyone else would be doing the same thing. It's called a power vacuum, and it will be filled. Making self-righteous comments is about as constructive a way to deal with the problem as jamming your joystick up your ass (which, since you know fags so well is probably something you're very familiar with)

  82. "Keep on truck'n" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Old School reference.

  83. Re:MOD PARENT UP! EXEMPLARY POST! HOLY FUCKING SHI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whew. Thanks. My reply was completely serious. Boy is my face red!

  84. Re: XP by choice by jdray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ever use OS X? It seems to fit all your requirements.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
  85. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm reading this on windows, but slackware is downloading. Right now it is at 13%.

  86. My letter.... by hopemafia · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear Win XP Pro,

    I know I haven't been faithful when it comes to computing. I've done it with your mother Win 2k at school, your great aunt Win 98 at my sister's, two of the Linux sisters, Redhat and Mandrake in our own apartment, and even your sister Win XP Home on my lap(top) right in front of you. I know your father M$ is mad since I've never paid him (a visit). But you've always been my main OS, ever since I first met you. I've always taken good care of you, patched all your flaws, protected you from viruses, and kept you secure when we go out in the world (wide web). Please don't leave me. None of the other OS's have everything I need and want.

    -hopemafia

    --
    If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  87. "Funny" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I recently read this open letter to Windows and I think it's pretty funny.


    Sorry, you're wrong.
  88. Forbidden Error? by greymond · · Score: 1

    Anyone have another link to the letter? When I click on the link it takes me to a "You don't have access to this blah blah blah" error.

  89. Re: XP by choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ever use OS X? It seems to fit all your requirements.

    He mentioned "games."

  90. Bob Dole doesn't know what your problem is by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bob Dole thinks you're a big internet meanie. I, Bob Dole, was talking to Bob Dole the other day, and Bob Dole agrees. Bob Dole sees nothing wrong with speaking of Bob Dole in the 3rd person, so why can't this SpaceCanary person do that too? Just IBDHO, of course.

    Love,
    Bob Dole :)

  91. OT: et al by bstadil · · Score: 1
    *et all*

    FYI it is not all as in the English word but al.

    Et alii (et al.)

    "And others" -- used to abbreviate a list of names (Alii is actually masculine, so it can be used for men, or groups of men and women; the feminine et aliae is appropriate when the "others" are all female.)

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:OT: et al by cranos · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but I had a major flash of the Latin Lecture scene from the Life Of Brian - "Right now write it out a hundred times or I'll cut your balls off".

  92. Permalink by ricotest · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Permalink by ricotest · · Score: 1

      Really!? I'm removing it from my blogroll right away!

    2. Re:Permalink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahahaha

      you guys are killing me!

  93. Convenient excuse, but false by jcoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft was consumed by a rush to market. They did not 'deliberately' design software that is insecure. What they did do, is design software with very little thought about security (or stability). Getting their product to market, addicting the public on their products, and increasing their stock was the number one priority. Unlike other companies (like Apple), they chose the path of getting as many copies of their software into the consumer market as fast as possible, instead of making really good and stable products. While many of us don't like what they did, they did 'succeed'. They have an incredibly dominant market and the corporate and consumer world is basically addicted to them.

    The bottom line is that they achieved their goals. They got rich. They have convinced the corporate and consumer world (in general) that there simply in no viable alternative to MS Office or the MS OS's.

    It's a dilemma... what would you do given the chance? Take the high road and only produce quality software that takes a lot of time and effort (and possible fail as a company)-- or grab the opportunity when you can to make a ton of cash and get huge?

    I don't like what MS did, but I understand it.

  94. Re: XP by choice by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ever use OS X? It seems to fit all your requirements.

    You're missing the stated "runs on my computer" requirement.

  95. a friend wrote this the other week... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    You think you're a bad ass because you've been beating up on 5th graders, but then you call out Mike Tyson; you break 4 ribs, lose an ear and realize you aren't all that - and some dog ate your bag of chips. But at least you can say you upgraded from a bully to a bitch for the pure joy of knowing you know nothing about being a 5th grader or a world heavy weight champion. And now you can move on with your life, wearing a body cast around your pride, knowing that any time someone picks a fight with you just ask your buddy to get your back because that fucker's been taking kung fu since he was 3. Or just go back to kicking around 5th graders and risk the diseases they carry that made you call out a healthy adult in the first place. So its your choice, risk losing a piece of yourself by taking the easy way out or stand tall, get the shit kicked out of you, work out and come back stronger than ever. But always remember once you kick Mike Tyson's ass, Godzilla and Galacticus are always waiting to slap you down.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  96. Re:Dear Anonymous Bastard, by Foofoobar · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish you didn't work for Microsoft.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  97. Windows reply by skywalker107 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear User,

    I came to you with the intention of helping you do your job better and make life at home a little less boring.

    I gave you everything you wanted. I am trying to be everything to everyone with all of my features. There are people out there that use windows and are a little more sane when they install software and hardware.

    Remeber the scanner incedent. You bought that cheap 29 dollar model and it wouldn't work. You blamed me for that. But you didn't think about maybe it was the scanner.

    And the software you choose. Where should I begin. I gave you limited dos access for EMERGENCY use. You abused that until I finally said enough and took it away. I open up my DLL's so your precious software could get in and help with tasks i wasn't suited for but it was just ignored, and custom controls were written and guess who you blamed when it didn't work.

    I gave you plug and play and you wanted USB i gave you USB and you wanted Firewire. I brought the internet to your doorstep and you just couldn't get enough.

    I had patches available and you didn't install them. (Mental note: Self patch once moron leaves) and almost all of the time i didn't get sick until after the patch was avlaible.

    And then the event that broke this windows pain. Spyware!!!! You just couldn't stop looking at porn could you. You had to buy those viagra pills.

    Thanks for Nothing

    Windows XP PRO SP2

    --
    My new title at the office is "Vice-President of Everything Else"
  98. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by DogDude · · Score: 1

    et a major PC manufacturer to start shipping some dual boot systems and see how well it fares...

    It's been tried time and time again. E-Machines, Dell, etc. It's been a failure every time, and the company pulls the product. It's not gonna stick until Linux does some serious improvements for the desktop.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  99. will produce products that are superior to ... by tickticktickfast · · Score: 0

    And when can we expect this mircale ?

  100. shameless plug for his own site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear SpaceCanary,

    It was _really_ lame to write a letter, and then post it to Slashdot saying that you came across "some guy's" letter.

    I hope that the medication is soon able to rectify your third-person issues. Next week, our therapy session will work on the "making friends" theme, so that you won't have to shamelessly plug your own work to gain recognition.

    Sincerely,
    I P Nightly

  101. Re:Dear Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this modded as flamebait? Sadly, this is the truth. Instead of dismissing his post as trolling, we should work to fix these and other problems. It's the only way Linux will ever become mainstream.

  102. Actually the box in question is running 98SE. by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    due to just that consideration. My apologies for not clarifying.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Actually the box in question is running 98SE. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      God speed good sir, you are a brave man.

  103. blahblahblah horse-drawn carriages blahblah blah by tickticktickfast · · Score: 0

    OSS is the horsedrawn carriage of software. It is the most retro, non-inovative software I've ever used. In all the excitement about the idea that it is free and the fact that it works at all most people seem to miss the fact that its usually junk compared to software that you pay for.

  104. Re:Dear Anonymous Bastard, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Actually, I work for American Virtual Relations, a public relations firm contracted by Microsoft. I get paid a considerable salary plus bonuses for every post I make on a discussion board attacking so-called "critics" of Microsoft.

    We're an organization that isn't listed on any major search engine. Rather, we're a unit of a well-known public relations firm (hint: think "R").

    Thanks for inquiring!

  105. Re: XP by choice by rikkards · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tried to install it but it wouldn't run on an Athlon :(

    Anyways I think people aren't "just" waking up to Windows being insecure, unstable etc. It's just that they are willing to live with it rather than investigate alternate OS

  106. Disclaimer: Slightly Offtopic... by samsmithnz · · Score: 1

    Sadly, when you drink you don't become a better singer, you only THINK you're better, otherwise I'd be awesome...

    1. Re:Disclaimer: Slightly Offtopic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for getting the joke.

  107. This deserves an... by Gldm · · Score: 1
    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  108. Dear Slashdot by corsair2112 · · Score: 0

    After years of enjoying your mainpage news, I have come to realize that your editors are morons and your mod system is run by down syndrome monkeys.

    When everyday is filled with "news articles" about a guy who farted and blamed it on Windows so now he's installing Linux, it's time to start spending my internet time elsewhere.

    I'm deleting my bookmark to Slashdot, "giving you back your key" if you will. I'd like to say it was fun while it lasted, but it wasn't.

    Good bye and good riddance!

  109. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people stick with Linux because it's free and it takes money to get something better.

    I corrected it for you.

  110. Re: XP by choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Tried to install it but it wouldn't run on an Athlon"

    It crawled, right?

  111. agreed: microsoft's idea of integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know when you see an AGP card plugged into PCI slot, or an audio jack plugged into the wall outlet?

    That's Microsoft's idea of integration.

  112. Re:Lynching niggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And explain why NOT lynching your type would be good for America too?

  113. Re:Dear Anonymous Bastard, by Foofoobar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Heh. I guess we can discuss this over lunch on the MS then, huh? Yeah, I have close ties with them as well but I wouldn't use Windows for anything except playing games; basically it's one pricey X-box.

    Aside from that, there is not one thing it can do better than open source. And don't give me this 'they have a larger market and thus are more of a target' crap. Sendmail and Apache have far larger markets than comparitive Microsoft products and they continually out perform and are more secure.

    Use that in your next FUD piece. It'd be nice if it's actually based on facts for a change. :)

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  114. Windows Responds. by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear SC:

    If you think you're going to just dump me and leave after you've used me for all these years, you have something else coming, bub.

    I was a tramp when you met me, and you should have known this. I was brash, got around, was completely unstable. You weren't particularily good to me either -- you'd just disappear for hours every time you wanted to play Doom with your buddies.

    And it wasn't as if you didn't have other options. There was that nice, stable, amd smart OS/2 next door who had eyes for you. OS/2 was smart, sophisticated, let you do more at once, and could handle twice the bits I could. But you wanted someone who got around, who had been with all your friends, and who didn't require you to think or learn anything, who let you leave me and covort around with your old DOS buddies whenever you wanted.

    I did everything I could to try to hide the good life from you. I gave you some flash once in a while, but no substance. For some reason, you stuck around. I was always afraid you and your friends who used me would notice, so I had to take drastic measures.

    First off, I had to routinely sneak into your house in every new PC you bought, even if you or your friends didn't want me around. In fact, even if you couold go to sufficient lengths to make sure I didn't sneak back into your home, you still had to pay for my services. You paid, and got nothing in return. And yet you still kept coming back.

    I didn't like some of your friends. That DR-DOS guy bugged me, so I went somewhat haywire everytime you invited him around. I didn't want you to see that there were ways to improve me -- I never had any intention of improving.

    Eventually you started noticing that my bits were only half of what the others were offering, so I promised I'd change. That I too would have 32 bits like the others.

    And you believed me like a sucker. At first I claimed to support 32 bits through Win32s, but it was really just some more 16 bit stuff in a 32 bit disguise. I kept changing at random, not for your benifit, but to make sure you couldn't leave me by breaking OS/2's ability to run my software every month or so. Poor OS/2 was running around in circles trying to attract you by keeping up with my useless changes.

    Then suddenly in 1995 I decided to get some cosmetic surgery. You were stunned when you saw me, but really I just showed the cosmetic surgeon some pictures of OS/2 and MacOS and had him take bits and pieces from them and re-shape me to look like their bastard child. I was still ugly underneath, with serious problems. I still couldn't do more than one thing at a time very well, was still unstable, and still got around with all your friends.

    Worse yet, now even if you had wanted to get rid of me, I was going to show up. When you decided to upgrade your old 486 to a shiney new Pentium, I showed up uninvited. When you upgraded that Pentium to a faster model, I once again showed up, even though you already had paid for my services and held a valid license. I kept sucking your wallet dry, and was still mentally unstable.

    Then I became schitzophrenic, and started offering myself in a real 32 bit version without the cosmetic surgury. But you avoided me because I wouldn't play with your old DOS games, and had serious issues that were new and strange to you.

    In 1998, you started to sour. I'd been abusing you for years, but you like the sucker you are continued to stick around. I offered you a way to get onto the Information Superhighway, but ensured you could only do so in my way, when I felt like letting you. Sure OS/2 had been letting people do this for a few years -- I kept you away from the game as long as possible, but in the end, in order to keep you, I finally relented and gave you access to the new highway.

    By 2000, I was able to become cocky, and my schitzophrenia grew worse. You had every right and option to leave me, but I had put blue screens over all your windows so you could

    1. Re:Windows Responds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow one less person that will be using Windows. Chauk up a point .. or .. not. Most people that use Windows don't even know what an OS is, and if they do, do you think they care? Only geeks like us care about such things

  115. Vampires I presume by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "finally more people are starting to see the light and moving away from Windows"

  116. Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Slashdot,

    Just this afternoon, I stubbed my toe on a Windows box. If it had been a Linux box, I highly suspect I would not be experiencing the pain I'm feeling right now. This is a perfect example of how Windows abuses the average computer user.

    I have submitted my story to you, dear Slashdot editors, with every confidence that it will soon be posted on your front page.

    Kindest regards,
    AC

  117. Dear Slashdot by Letter · · Score: 1
    Dear Slashdot,

    I love all this attention. Keep it coming!

    Letter

  118. Re:Dear Anonymous Bastard, by Foofoobar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh and for the record, there are alot of us in Microsoft and around the campus in Redmond and Bellevue. We work from within. We're also working on Microsofts vendors... their IT departments seem to be tired of products that have crappy security. Gee, I wonder why? :)

    By the way, I have a JPG you would enjoy :)

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  119. Move Away?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    re: "...but finally more people are starting to see the light and moving away from Windows" -- What? Haha? Regrettably for the linux naysayers, Windows continues to dominate the OS market. As linux becomes more user-friendly, more people will use it, but you seem to think that increasing Linux market share = decreasing MS market share. The truth is, MS continues to spend big $$ on hiring the best and brightest to deliver exactly what they want to deliver - not the most stable OS, but the most popular. If you think people are 'seeing the light' and moving from MS to L, you're fooling yourself -- *noone* moves to L unless they're a hardware geek (like myself - I run RH and BeOS at home), a (probably wannabe) hacker, or are just curious. There has *never* been an average user who actually looked at both OS's, and said 'Wow, L is just better'.

    Wake up - you're bashing what you can't understand.

    1. Re:Move Away?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...There has *never* been an average user who actually looked at both OS's, and said 'Wow, L is just better'...."

      I'm a Joe Sixpack and I have to say I like my L better. I mean, I use a Windows box 2088 hrs/year at work and come home to my L and like it. Yeah, I had to invest some time learning but that is behind me now. So never say never.

  120. Dear MacOS X, by HedonismBot · · Score: 1

    I am deeply concerned about the state of our relationship. Don't get me wrong, you're as cute as it gets and I hold no doubt that you're the most appealing partner anyone can have. You also seem to understand my needs; we have great fun together. Besides, I have taken great advantage of your ability to use your burly sister's stuff (what was her name, uNIXon?) and I remember fondly how you didn't mind if I met your more popular friend, the one with the house made of glass (that's pretty insecure and dangerous, if you ask me).

    But I fear it's over. Since you dyed your hair to black (wish you made up your mind - you've had blonde with black spots, dark blonde, back to blonde&black and I've heard you're planning to use it again next year - you're worse than the 'Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind' chick), I've noticed you've become too much of a show-off. Anyone can just walk up to you and, just with his simple gesture, you're willing to take off your clothes and let him see your bare skin, choose whatever part of you they fancy and access to it without further hassle. I mean, it's bad enough seeing you flirt with that pale musician guy all the time, always sharing everything, but I would have expected you to keep your decency. I'm dumping you.

    Oh, who am I kidding? Come here and kiss me!

    --
    Sailors. Oh man!
  121. Funniest Post Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but finally more people are starting to see the light and moving away from Windows

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

    *wipes away tear*

    How precious!

  122. Re:Dear Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for pointing out why 90% of the population of the world will never use Linux.

  123. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by toetagger1 · · Score: 1

    So are you suggesting that I should find a women that can dual-boot?

    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  124. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by heffrey · · Score: 1

    Maybe they stick with it because it's better than the competition in their eyes. After all freedom of choice is a good thing. Isn't it?

  125. Why are Linux users so bitter? by heffrey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Linux is so great then why do such acidic stories get posted? I mean, use Linux if that makes you happy. It doesn't bother me. It just makes the Linux community look pathetic when they make such snide comments about users of other systems.

    Grow up folks!

    1. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...Why are Linux users so bitter?..."

      One reason, I guess, is because Microsoft is pouring lots of energy into destroying it in order to protect its cash cow.

    2. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another reason I see could be that Microsoft keeps trying to get its "standards" established on the internet so Linux won't be compatible and thereby making Microsoft the only choice you get to pick.

      You experience these things when you use something other than MS. And then you wonder why it has to be like this. Some people probably get a little angry over this.

    3. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Take it up with Redmond not the people who use (by choice or otherwise) the systems.

      Vegans don't eat animal products but they don't run around bagging you and I out do they?

      Yes, some Linux users are bitter, and in the same way MS wishes to protect it's cash cow, you wish to destroy it and promote the cause of your OS in a morally similar manner. Except of course, you are under the false belief that you have the right to do so. No better than them.

      Leave them to be and further your cause by providing the better alternative and you WILL certainly take the lion's share and have a cause worth championing. Furthering yourself by pulling others back is NOT moving forward and only serves to ultimately damage your cause, not theirs

    4. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I experienced the same from Windows users. Tell them you use Linux and you're automagicly: anti-Microsoft, anti-capitalist, a commie, non-conformist, and, most damning, free thinker.

    5. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

      Linux users are naturally bitter due to years of struggling with their OS, trying to make it do one damn useful thing without having to track down some obscure software that has to be compiled and installed at just the right time during the installation of some other application.

      I'm not talking about writting grandma a letter, I mean useful work.

      Try installing PostGIS with full GEOS and PROJ4 support. Come back to me a week later and claim you had fun doing it. ... and NO, you can not setup PostGIS with GEOS and PROJ4 support for use with MapServer using RPMs!

      After you are done trying to make that work, tell me all your glorious stories of the other Linux users on all those great open source 'help' forums who treated you like crap, gave you instructions that left out critical and obscure steps, and pretty much refused to help because they themselves had to struggle with it and feel that you too must experience the pain.

      It almost makes the alternative of the $50k price of Oracle with ArcSDE worth it.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    6. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot hippie

    7. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... you wish to destroy it and promote the cause of your OS in a morally similar manner...."

      I do? News to me.

      "...Except of course, you are under the false belief that you have the right to do so..."

      I do? Maybe you are refering to some other Linux users.

      "...Leave them to be and further your cause..."

      My cause? I'm just user of the OS.

      "...you WILL certainly take the lion's share and have a cause worth championing...."

      I don't want the lion's share. In fact if Linux was the most common desktop, I'd switch. I like having an OS that is not mainstream to avoid viruses and commercializm.

      "...ultimately damage your cause..."

      My cause, again? You must be thinking of a group of people not me. I don't have too much of a cause except that I want the internet to remain free and open; that is, no proprietary protocols in a open public arena. Oh, and W3C complient web pages... no ActiveX stuff that is for only for one group of people. Humm, sounds like I'm asking too much, huh.

    8. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by cheros · · Score: 1

      You would too if you had +2 decades worth of fighting with the dreadful engineering that hides behind the glossy brochures you PHB buys from.

      I've used DOS from version 3 in all guises (including DoubleDOS), I used GEM, I used Windows from Worries for Workgroups till XP and I'm ab-so-lu-te-ly staggered that in those two decades it has gotten prettier in looks, but worse in quality and waste of computing resources.

      I mean, why do I need to give a user a machine running at over 1GHz with at least 512MB of RAM to run a simple word processor? So that it chime "ding" if it has auto-corrected the capitalisation of a TLA? Why do I need an expensive hardware cluster to get uptimes that a home user with a cheapo PC using Linux or BSD would consider normal? Why do I have to force designers to use anything Windows to make their nice Macs interact with my corporate engines?

      However, in that time I have also used Solaris, HP-UX, AIX and I've been using Linux since Slackware came on floppies. And yes, I've used OS/2 too, as well as pre-OSX Macs.

      Let's just say that on the basis of raw experience quite a few of us have reasons to resent having to fight to simply keep things working instead of focusing on making things work *better*.

      Try incorporating downtime, patching, license management and security risk management and insurance in your TCO and see what Facts You REALLY Need To Get. Here's a hint - it won't look good for Microsoft.

      Damn, too much coffee again ;-).

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    9. Re:Why are Linux users so bitter? by heffrey · · Score: 1

      Well that's just fine. Use whatever system you feel suits your needs the best. My question is why do so many people here feel the need to whine and complain about Windows?

      It's a free world. If you don't like it use something else!

  126. Office Standards by daddymac · · Score: 1
    AFAIK, there isn't an official "standard" Office format. I have played around with Star Office, Open Office, Abiword, etc. without too many problems, but translating from one office app to another and back always messes something up. So now I use my licensed (through work, of course) copy of Office 2000 on my Fedora Linux system running Crossover Office. Crossover Office runs all my "Office" apps, including IE6 (if I need it to run some Flash Communication Server streaming video or whatever that won't run under Linux/Mozilla) and Lotus Notes without a hitch.

    If I need to read/write word docs (which I do, unfortunately most people aren't down with the "text" format) or excel spreadsheets, I use Word or Excel. Not a problem. If someone gives me something in OpenOffice format, then I use Open Office.

    If I am the originator of a document, then I will send it as plain text, so anything can read it. If I need to send out a spreadsheet, I'll send it as comma-delimitted, if they can't figure it out then I'll export it to Excel for them or build an html file with tables.

    --
    If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
  127. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by xSauronx · · Score: 1
    whats better?

    not trying to troll, but seriously...whats better? Ive played with linux a dozen times, differnt distros over the years. As a basic desktop, its getting there, but the hardware support is stil iffy.

    As a gaming machine, a serious gaming machine, its useless. Theres a *few* mainstream great games that are made to run on linux natively, for a serious gamer like me, thats not good enough.

    For day to day use its good, quite passable; but better overall? Probably not quite, and "better" is a matter of opinion. And yours and mine will differ still from a regular desktop user in a cubicle or a small office. For some people, windows is better, no matter what you like about linux. And for some, mac is better than either.

    --
    By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  128. Re:Securing Windows by tengu1sd · · Score: 1
    We use Windows based PCs (2000) to capture graphicss for web servers. So far, I've been lucky, but have a few tips for securing Windows.

    Disable the TCP/IP stack. This simple step elimantes many virus/worm IE and Outlook problems.

    Images are either scanned or burned to CD-Rom. We do not allow TCP-IP networking on a PC that connects to a server.

  129. Re:Dear Linux... by rayh911 · · Score: 1

    Damn... That is enough to make me want to leave both you bitches. And I don't want to hear another "RTFM!"

  130. He thought so....when he wrote it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SpaceCanary writes "I recently wrote this open letter to Windows and I think it's pretty funny. I wrote a letter to my OS as if I was breaking up with it. It's a bit strange, but finally more people are starting to see the light and moving away from Windows - in fact 100% of the people living in my mom's basement have switched. I chronicled my relationship with the versions of Windows and finally I am able to move on in the end."

    Registered through: GoDaddy.com
    Domain Name: XYZCOMPUTING.COM
    Created on: 21-Oct-03
    Expires on: 21-Oct-05
    Last Updated on: 06-Aug-04

    Administrative Contact:
    Cangeloso, Salvatore admin@xyzcomputing.com


    salcan@gmail.com? Letter is signed S.C.? Hmmm....

    1. Re:He thought so....when he wrote it. by chawly · · Score: 1

      Yes, well perhaps he thought to be funny. Perhaps. I think that he really was "exorcising" what was a beautiful little dream a lot of us had - if we're honest. I started with Microsoft just before Windows 95 became available. I still remeber how much difficulty I had to get it stable and usable. But I remember how beautiful it was. How much I liked it. How much I thought it would improve - no, how sure I was that it would improve. I too have been seeing somebody else lately - in fact for quite some time. She is improving as I hoped - being not commercially orientated. There is no way I'd return to the Windows fold. But I regret .... I regret the "image", the "dream" of progress. Can't see a gate now without wanting to kick it. No joke, Bill, old chum. No joke, I do assure you. And I don't think our friend "SC" was even trying to be funny

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  131. Windows whoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For now I'm off to that flashy babe Windows. She might be an expensive, unreliable whore, but she looks stunning and good in bed. (...) Though I'll be back when she breaks my heart.
    You probably won't be back anywhere, ever.
    She's known to have had some 500 million guys, who've given her every virus or worm there is, and by the time you realize what a contagious beast she was, you'll have contracted so much more than both of you wished to share.
    Sure, there are rumors about that new miracle drug, SP3, that's supposed to save a lucky few of the people who were in bed with her, some day, but everyone says it won't be around in a while (quite possibly too late for you), and nothing ever brought relief for more than a few weeks anyway...
  132. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by emm-tee · · Score: 1

    Most people stick with Windows because it's there and it takes effort to get something better.

    For the vast majority of the population, for whom computers are not a hobby, less effort is better.

  133. Re:Dear Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been with that harlot from Washington before. It was fun for a short while, she was more sociable and got along with everybody, but one night she turned blue and I knew something was wrong. Turns out I got over two dozen viruses from that bitch.

    Our relationship was immediately over.

  134. Windows ME systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But imagine a cluster of those!!!!!!

  135. Re:Dear Internet, IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You say you wouldn't touch IE. How do you have any choice?

    Why, the first thing I notice about my Income Tax program from Intuit Canada (Quick Tax), is that it clearly uses IE dll's for all connections to the net. It is impossible to avoid IE in doing the most security critical things such as accessing absolute mandatory program updates (without with which it could not be compliant with all last minute changes to tax laws).

    Ditto, with Norton AntiVirus. When you keep up with the latest virus signatures, it uses IE modules for you to download them.

    The list goes on and on, but the worst of all is Microsoft Windows Update itself which is carefully designed to force you to use IE and ActiveX.

    By the way, I find that with respect to gdiplus.dll, the one that may be vulnerable to the bug that allows exploits via jpeg images, both HP and Norton software may be using doubtful versions.

    Yep, you sure can trust good old Microsoft! NOT!

    Microsoft is the good old "ease of use" company that changes to the "most difficult possible to use" when the slightest need for security arises!

  136. Dear Microsoft Windows by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always hated you. There, I said it. I mean, sure, there was that childlike wonder in the 3.0 days when I was all "ooo... icons", but even then, you were fat, clumsy, and held me back from truly enjoying what I was really after.

    The computer - that sweet hotness that took my breath away from the very beginning when I first saw my friend's TI99-4A. O how I pine for the days of the bliss of programming in basic! And then came DOS, and GAMES! We had some wild nights back in the day.

    But you were always there, the computer's ugly friend who I had to accomodate and pretend to like. The only time I really ever began to think of you as anything more than an obstacle to my happiness is when I stopped using BBS services and discovered the Internet. But for that, I needed winsock and Netscape 1.0. You did the job poorly, but what choice did I have? You became not only my seetheart's ugly sister, but the ugly sister who had a car. If I wanted to see Dupree's Iguana cam, I had to hitch a ride from you. And so it went.

    Then came Windows95. You went from fat, annoying, and in the way to outright mean. You deliberately made my life difficult with your constant registry needs and inexplicable crashes. You harassed my customers and friends, and sucked away years of my life toiling in utter futility to find some way to get along with you without the situation becoming abusive. I knew there were places I could go to escape what was clearly an unhealthy relationship, like Linux, but I felt trapped. I had become so numb to the constant cycle of learning and relearning what would ultimately be useless information about how you went about your business and how best to work with you, wading through so much heartache and lies, that I let myself think that everyone was like you. I thought that getting to know someone like Linux would be just as futile as it was to live with you, and so I never sought escape. I thought it would be so hard to start new with someone else, and so I never did.

    98 came and went, as did 99, the year we all focused on WindowsME (selfish bitch). By 2000, I had forgotten why I started doing any of this in the first place. The wonder at the freedom to sit down in front of my C64 and create my own world was lost in a cacophony of blue screens, conflicting dlls, and product license key dialog boxes. I thought of ending it all. I thought of choosing another career, maybe working on cars for a living, because I just couldn't take it anymore.

    Then, off in the distance, I saw Linux again. She had changed since I'd seen her last. She was so much more open and welcoming. She didn't have your sophistication and clout, at least in those days, but there was a certain spark about her. There was something that seemed like being in front of that TI all over again - something wonderful, inspiring, and exciting. It started as a tryst on my home machine. A friend introduced us and I took her for a spin. She was intelligent, sleek, and seemed to do everything right. She never manipulated me for some other purpose; never lied to me. I forgot what it was like to deal with someone who was more concerned about my needs than the next big deal.

    I felt young again. She rekindled my early love and I faced the day anew, energized by the freedom and power of our new relationship. I didn't realize it at the time, but we were definately going places together. She would see me through some troubled times in the years to come. With her support, I've been able to do things I'd never dreamed of when I was slumming around with you.

    I just want you to know that I regret every moment of our time together, and I will never go back.

  137. A better (IMO) example of OS personification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  138. Guess who this reminds me of? by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    After having read this, and looking back on my own experiences with Windows, I think the operating system has just found a new mascot.

    Linux's mascot is Tux...After today, I suspect Windows' could be Britney Spears.

    1. Re:Guess who this reminds me of? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Linux's mascot is Tux...After today, I suspect Windows' could be Britney Spears.

      Britney? I don't think so. She may be a tramp but she's way too young; still very innocent and naturally good-looking.

      No, Windows has been a selfish, domineering whore for decades now, and she's undergone round after round of plastic surgery, the latest making her look cheaper than ever.

      That's not Britney... that's Cher. Dressed in black leather, holding a whip and with her skin stretched so tight over her face that it'd probably vibrate like a drum if you tapped it. That's a better mascot for Windows.

      But that might be an unfair comparison. Sorry to do that to you, Cher.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  139. Re: XP by choice by Smurf · · Score: 1

    You're missing the stated "runs on my computer" requirement.
    Uh..., no, actually that requirement wasn't stated.

  140. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear reader,

    Forbidden
    You don't have permission to access /index.php on this server.

  141. Constructive criticism... by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suppose most of your opinions could be a matter of personal taste (I personally wouldn't mod you flamebait--maybe troll if I was in a bad mood), but I think it is because some of your criticisms of Linux appear to me and others as somewhat baseless. It gives the impression that you are either ill-informed or just looking to stir up crap:

    * MS is "easy to use" vs. Linux. This may be becasue you are most familiar with it. You'd probably think Macs were harder to use if you think Mandrake or Lycoris or Linspire were hard to use.

    * MS "looks good" - again a matter of personal taste--I personally think XP looks like garbage and it is the one of the main reason I refuse to upgrade my Win2k system at home to XP. At work--well--I just have to deal with it (customer is always right you know--besides there is always "classic mode"). If you DO like the XP look there are themes to make Linux look more like it, and Lycoris and Linspire were designed with that in mind.

    * MS doesn't take too long to load up. That is crap--on todays hardware everything starts up pretty quickly. On slower hardware like my notebook (dual boots Win2k and Mandrake 9.1) I find Mandrake boots significantly faster. Perhaps you did a huge/full install of Mandrake and started all services if you found it slow. In the application space, you should try AbiWord and Gnumeric--they are lightweight and speedy and have enough features to be useful for everyday work (actually Gnumeric kicks all other spreadsheets butts!)

    * Games - probably your only truly valid point. However video card drivers and game selection are slowly getting better

    * You don't have to build Linux from scratch yo your statement comes across as a thinly veiled insult. In fact in my experience and many others that are documented on the web, most popular distributions of linux are in fact EASIER to install than Windows. Plus, if you are reinstalling windows 2k or XP be prepared to spend extra time finding offline copies of the most important updates and installing them, along with firewall and antivirus software before you get anywhere NEAR a network connection, or you could literally pick up a virus within minutes. The only reason XP seems "easy" is because PC makers do the work for you before you even buy the PC.

    * you've acknowledged you use Opera over IE--but aren't you aware that IE is so pervasive and integrated now that it could rear its hideous head even when you are not surfing the 'net? Plus, to use windows update you MUST use it.

    It's a free country and you are entitled to your choice (and if your PC is indeed your entertainment then XP is probably the best choice). It's also fortunate that you've had zero problems with XP, because (along with win2k)it has been the cause of countless problems in my life. Personally, computer games are only a very small part of my "entertainment", and should I decide I want the best, latest games I'll pick up an XBox or a PS2. For productivity, web surfing and so on (my needs are not demanding either) I feel safer and more at home with Linux.

    1. Re:Constructive criticism... by suckmysav · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I personally think XP looks like garbage and it is the one of the main reason I refuse to upgrade my Win2k system at home to XP"

      Mebbe you already know this, but you do know that you can turn off the brain-rotting "eye candy" and make XP look pretty much just like Win2000 don't you?

      Having said that, there is still not a whole lot of reason as far as I can tell to make the upgrade anyway. XP doesn't do anything better than 2000 (unless you want to run the latest and greatest Adobe bloatware, which demands XP for no good reason at all.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  142. I think i want a girl like OS X by terranman2 · · Score: 1

    I need a girl like OS X, sure she's expensive, but she's easy to use, and always ready to multitask to make sure you have the best user experience possible

  143. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a major PC manufacturer to start shipping some dual boot systems and see how well it fares...

    They will lose the special price for Windows. These PCs will cost more and will be less able to compete with the Windows-only PC.

    If you don't insist to have Windows and PCs, you can get dual-boot PowerPC systems (with Mac OS X and YellowDog Linux) from Terrasoft.

    But most people that want a Linux OS usually just buy a computer and install it themselves.

  144. Wow. Some letter. by trudyscousin · · Score: 1

    "Warning: Unknown(/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in Unknown on line 0
    Warning: (null)(): Failed opening '/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in Unknown on line 0
    "

    It's somehow fitting that a letter meant for an operating system should be barely human-perceivable.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
  145. Telescope motors are *that* heavy? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    a single comparable HST motor (36.5 MW) will weigh 75 tons!
    75 tons? And they fit how many of those into the HST? (-:
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  146. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some people, windows is better, no matter what you like about linux. And for some, mac is better than either.

    100% Agree. You cannot force an OS on someone. It depends of their needs etc. If someone likes Windows, then who cares if they use it. If they don't like Windows and they still want to use it anyway, who cares.

    BTW, Mac is hardware, so I guess you meant Mac OS X. In any case I prefer to run Gentoo Linux on my Mac laptop. Some people prefer Debian or Mac OS X. I respect their choice.

  147. Penguins don't smell of herring by mangu · · Score: 1

    Of course, they do smell of fish. I don't know exactly which species of fish, but I'm pretty sure there are no herring species in Antarctica, where penguins live.

    1. Re:Penguins don't smell of herring by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Tux racer, dude.

      Besides, even if Tux smells like fish, that makes him different from a real woman in what way?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  148. How fucking Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How fucking lame. I must be a lamer too for I keep returning to this site.

  149. apt-get remove konqueror by mangu · · Score: 1
    If 50% of the linux community said they wanted the ability to rip Konqeror out of the system the KDE team would probably do it.


    Hey, that isn't hard to do, not at all...

  150. Thick as a brick? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm. I have a customer whose machine lasts about 43 minutes at a time under MS-Windows XP but runs flawlessly under Mandrake Linux 10.0 (he dual-boots, Mdk-Linux for real work and MS-Windows for MS-centric stuff). Does that count towards your theory? (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Thick as a brick? by Zonnald · · Score: 1

      Is it possible that having Mandrake Linux 10.0 with MS-Windows XP my be the problem.

      Why does my Crap Dell laptop run XP (SP2) for several days on end (i.e. I shut the lid at night, and only turn it off to save on electricity).

      I have noticed that, like Cats, Windows problems seem to be attracted to people who hate windows.

    2. Re:Thick as a brick? by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      DUH, people who hate windows hate it because they had the problems..

    3. Re:Thick as a brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is it possible that having Mandrake Linux 10.0 with MS-Windows XP my be the problem.

      So Windows can't co-exist with another OS? That'd make the problem Windows...

      > Why does my Crap Dell laptop run XP (SP2) for several days on end (i.e. I shut the lid at night, and only turn it off
      > to save on electricity).

      Oh! Well, that solves it then! He must have made it up, because one guy saying that his system works fine means another person who claims otherwise is lying. It would be as logical to say that "You've been in a plane crash? How have I been on board many planes while they're in flight, and I've never been in a crash." See how that's wrong? Pretty much the same thing you've said. GET A CLUE.

      > I have noticed that, like Cats, Windows problems seem to be attracted to people who hate windows.

      I have noticed that, like halfwits, Windows zealots tend to comment without thinking. For instance, a person who put some thought into it would notice that
      a) people who hate Windows usually hate it for some quantifiable reason (dislike of Microsoft's monopolistic business practises, insecurities).
      b) people who like it also have things go wrong with it.
      and
      c) after implying that Windows problems don't exist ("Why does my [sic]Crap Dell laptop...") you then state that Windows problems do exist, but are only attracted to people who hate Windows.

    4. Re:Thick as a brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why does my Crap Dell laptop run XP (SP2) for several days on end
      >(i.e. I shut the lid at night, and only turn it off to save on electricity).

      Wow, several *days* ?? Spoken like a true MS brainwashed serf.

      An OS shouldn't need periodic rebooting, period. That's just an MS invention that
      you've taken to be the norm.

      People who were brought up with proper computers just laugh at you.

      And, people hate windows BECAUSE of the windows problems, not the other way around.
      Nice call though!

    5. Re:Thick as a brick? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that, like Cats, Windows problems seem to be attracted to people who hate windows.

      Wrong. I have a cat, and the only windows problem it produces is little nose marks on the window panes. Windows problems that cause pain are attracted by people who use Windows.

    6. Re:Thick as a brick? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that, like Cats, Windows problems seem to be attracted to people who hate windows.

      I don't know if this occured to you, but perhaps these people (including myself) hate Windows BECAUSE of these problems?

  151. WOW! A dead php box. That'll show Windows! Pfffff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    WOW!


    "Warning: Unknown(/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in Unknown on line 0

    Warning: (null)(): Failed opening '/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in Unknown on line 0"


    That has got to be the best "break up letter to Windows" I have ever seen. A f#cked up p.o.s. php box that doesnt do shiat hehehehehehehe.
  152. But they're right by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    FOSS is all about choice.
    I wish people would stop saying this.
    They're righ, but. FOSS is about not having a company which can be bought, railroaded or driven off a cliff. FOSS is about being able to take it as-is or re-work it to suit. FOSS is about being able to play mix-n-match with your software components (e.g. I can still use them same email client, browser and office suite under NetBSD on my PowerPC as I did under XP on my x86).

    Yes, I realise that these choices are based on freedom, but most (to pick an example out of a hat) FireFox users couldn't care less whether the $0 browser they're leeching was free-as-in-speech or not. They only care that they can choose an alternative browser without any red tape or "meter money".

    They're not even aware that the one follows the other, let alone worried about it, and "Open Source" is one of those black-box words like "nucular physics" that get used for mentally tagging certain items without a shred of understanding (comma, pronounciation or spelling). However, this congonsentic elite represent a wedge that FOSS is driving into a closed market, which will make a bit more room in related markets for other FOSS, and ultimately other competitors, closed or not.
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  153. Re:Dear ecko3437, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your boast is much intriguing. I can use your expertise for my web farm.

    Would you pretty please post your Windows Server's IP address(es) so that I may verify your much touted security and uptime?

    Thank you,
    ---
    A truly anonymous coward.

  154. Dear John by isomeme · · Score: 1
    Warning: Unknown(/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in Unknown on line 0
    Warning: (null)(): Failed opening '/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in Unknown on line 0
    I foresee a stormy breakup with PHP coming next.
    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  155. Your .sig by rjamestaylor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    • I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought...Albert Einstien

    AE expected the weapons to change, but not the way of warfare. In fact we are in the midst of World War III right now. And the weapons have actually become more crude than they were during World War II and the extension called the Cold War. The weapons of World War III are:

    • Passenger planes
    • Human bombs -- young men and women
    • Grainy videos of beheadings of innocents
    • Bomb-ladden school gyms
    • Box cutters and shoe bombs
    • etc.

    I hadn't considered this until reading your .sig. Now that the super-weapons have made state-to-state warefare unwinnable by any rouge state the way of warring has changed.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:Your .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dumbass? He was completely right!

    2. Re:Your .sig by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      That's why he called me a dumbass. See, if I did something stupid someone would point that out. When all someone can do is disagree, then the person himself is the problem. I wonder if the AC thought I was making a political statement.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    3. Re:Your .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty good, except the Cold War was an extension of WWII in the same way that WWII was an extension of WWI. The Cold War was World War III, and World War IV is being fought right now.

    4. Re:Your .sig by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're only half right at best. Some of the players are using the weapons you mention, the crude ones, but other players are using very sophisticated weapons. State of the art weapons haven't made war unwinable, they've just made it unwinable if you happen to posses them and use them (thought I forgot the don't? Didn't.).

      It's the classic story of the haves and the have nots. The haves (the ones with the state of the art weapons) sqeeze everything they can get away with from the have nots. Then they hang the have nots for daring to look at their women. It can go on like this for centuries until the have nots decide that they've had enough.

      The English in India. The American South early last century. South Africa 30 years ago. The peasants in France pre-revolution. The workers in Russia pre-revolution. Linux giving away software as it's only weapon against Microsoft.

      Today looks very similar. The trodden can only take so much before it doesn't matter how crude their weapons are... they fight anyway. And that war, as it turns out, is rarely winnable by the people with the state of the art weapons. Because you can't kill off _all_ of the people that do your laundry, buy your software, work in your mines and grow your food. When enough of them rise up, they find that even the crudest of weapons will do.

      The only way to win against the crudest weapons is to assimilate the ways of the oppressed. China is winning because they're embracing many parts of capitalism. The Soviet Union won when their countries started holding elections. The only way the current overlords can hope to win is if they start showing respect to the lives of the people they're fighting against. As long as we consider them to be "evil" their crude weapons will carry the day.

      TW

    5. Re:Your .sig by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      AE expected the weapons to change, but not the way of warfare.

      The way of warfare you described is directly related to the disparity of weaponry. Consider however that anything even remotely resembling WWIII has not occured yet, merely an insignificant (on military scale) bombing followed by minor (in terms of WWII battlefields) operations by a few countries. WWIII will come, as you accurately sense, in form of globe-spanning bacteriological or nanotech warfare. Consider this: in not so remote future it will be possible with low cost and a modicum of knowledge to produce custom genetically engineered material in a basement. I am afraid human race will have some serious questions to ask itself when the time of widely and cheaply available weapons of global mass destruction comes. All the pigheaded, religious, greedy, power-hungry shit people are doing to each other now will have a rather serious bill attached to it. Some measures will of course be taken to prevent it, like a total ban on science and total control of information people have, combined with 24/7 continuous surveilance of all individuals. But although these measures will be implemented, they will inevietably fail in stopping the attacks.

      A chinese curse apparently says "May you live in Interesting Times". I am afraid that truly "Interesting Times" are just around the corner.

    6. Re:Your .sig by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Trodden? I'm not talking about the trodden. The only trodden fighting World War III are the religious fascists trying to fight a global war using their most vulnerable people (the trodden) as the weapons.

      Then you go off and talk about social and economic changes. Sure, these changes are important, but they are not warfare. In fact, I'd prefer not to refer to these changes in martial terms but in terms fitting their domain: social, political and economic changes.

      There is a war on between Jihadists and Secularists (many of whom are religious people of faith, but know that the State cannot be entrusted with such important matters). And in this war there are those who HAVE modern weapons and those who don't. It is imparative that we (the West, the Secularists) maintain this critical imbalance.

      I am glad my country has weapons and willpower to hunt down the Jihadists and destroy them.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    7. Re:Your .sig by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There is a war on between Jihadists and Secularists (many of whom are religious people of faith, but know that the State cannot be entrusted with such important matters).

      I am afraid that you have become a victim of a Western desease known as "sound-bite mania" or gross oversimplification of issues to make them appear black/white. This is a desirable effect of indoctrination by the "media", by like minded peers but most importantly by people who benefit from such abuse of your worldview.

      To look at things in more detail: your "secularists" are not. The Western camp is divided in many groups, some of them equally vicious, bloodthirsty and dangerous as the Jihadists (Israel springs to mind). Some others are willing to sacrifice tens of thousands of lives to play global power games or prove their pet socio-economic theories (the Neocons). Some others are willing to resort to brutal repression to keep their state (for better or worse) from fracturing into thousand pieces, a process of fragmentation which is actively encouraged by the Neocons for their purposes (Russia). That last one is particularly insideous because the Neocons (and other power hungry jackals) are actually aiding and funding the same very Jihadists they are supposedly fighting desperately elsewhere. But as they say, lust for power knows no shame. I could go on. In the other camp you have a mix of religious maniacs, desperados and people who consider themselves freedom fighters. You have nationalists who blow themselves up under a US tank in a bid to free their country and you have psychos who send teenage girls to blow themselves up in a cafe while they jostle for political power.

      This of course is just but a tiny sample of the actual complexity of the issue. But you are certainly doing a disservice to everyone by over-simplyfing it and at the same time you are also furthering the agenda of various Western-borne equivalents of "Jihadists" who wish to use this as a vehicle which they will ride to ultimate global power. Be wary because the fuel for that vehicle is ignorance and blood.

    8. Re:Your .sig by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a religious war. These people live in desperate conditions. From their perspective, the only real resource they have to help them out of these conditions (oil) is virtually given to the west while the occupants of the land see very little tangible bennefit. We stay rich and they stay poor.

      Look at the people of palistine: poor
      Look at people of Iraq: poor
      Look at the people of Afganistan: poor

      The only rich countries in the region are the ones we're not fighting.

      Saudi Arabia: allies
      Kuwait: allies

      Look, the "haves" like to think that they're clean and good. Part of the way they do this is by misinterpretting the problem. Instead of seeing that they have a position of privelege and that they've set up the system so they'll always win, they see that the "have nots" are lawbreakers. It's easy to keep oppressing a lawbreaker. A murderer. A Zelot. Why should someone like that have rights? It's much harder to acknowledge that you've set up a system to where you pick which brand of HDTV you like while they're deciding between food and lights.

      So you've decided that they're "Jihadists" and "murderers". Wrong choice. That will get you exactly the same place as Israel, decade after painful decade of war. If you would have decided that these are needy people lashing out in desperation and maybe backed Iraqi oil going to Iraqi labor unions instead of Haliberton you might have had a fighting chance.

      TW

    9. Re:Your .sig by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      • To look at things in more detail: your "secularists" are not. The Western camp is divided in many groups, some of them equally vicious, bloodthirsty and dangerous as the Jihadists (Israel springs to mind).
      Israel is a secular democratic state as is every Western country, save the Vatican, and as such it poses no threat except to those wishing to destroy it (I won't argue this point tonight). I stopped reading your "long-winded fanaticism" when I got to this point (except I did skim).

      Try saying simple things with less words.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    10. Re:Your .sig by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Then you go off and talk about social and economic changes. Sure, these changes are important, but they are not warfare.

      From what I understand of history, the social and economic changes are both the primary causes and the primary consequences of warfare. Been that way for at least the last several thousand years.

    11. Re:Your .sig by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I stopped reading your "long-winded fanaticism" when I got to this point

      Let me see. One of us reads the other's comments and the other one stops reading two lines in because its "fanaticsm". I dont think "fanaticsm" means what you think it means...

      Israel is a secular democratic state as is every Western country

      Goodness gratious, you are living in some alternate universe. Israel is defined to be a "Jewish" state. Not by me but by its founding fathers. It is in "The Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel" of 1948. Unless there is a "Jewish" race (to my knowledge original Jews were Semites, just like the Palestinians and many other Arabs are) or some other clear-cut definition of a nation (all other "nations" are defined by unquestionable race/population/territory context which Isreal lacks utterly) we are talking a state whose defining element is religious. Democracy does not preclude wanton aggression as history teaches repeatedly, starting at war-mongering ancient Athens city-state and going from there all the way to adventures in Iraq. A cursory look at any independent (i.e. not written in Israel or by Isreali citizens in the USA or by opposing Arabic writers) history of events in Middle East of the last 50 years would certainly speak of what is today euphemistically called "ethnic clensing", apartheid, land grabs, annexations and destruction of property, summary punishments, etc. etc. all motivated by religious messianic fever with a healthy dose of greed and supremacist attitudes. The fact that Israel is surrounded by less then pleasant company of dictatorships and wobbly kingdoms is not an excuse to attempt to run (and annex choice chunks of) the neighourhood. I cant believe any person with even a modicum of integrity can defend blatant abuses Isreal has commited for all of these decades, on the basis that its political system is "democratic". Oh and example of how truly democratic that system is, one can find in the attempts to eliminate the voting rights of the Arab minority in Israel, in fear that its birth rate will lead to eventual majority of citizens of Israel being non-Jewish. But on the other hand one could expect that from a state that defines itself as being of one religion.

    12. Re:Your .sig by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      But they are not warfare. Obviously warfare has a precursor cause and post conflict result.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    13. Re:Your .sig by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      "long-winded fanaticism" was counter to "sound-bite mania". You need to stop and think before starting to respond.

      The reason I stopped actively reading (I did still skim for anything worthwhile) is that your comment was so ridiculously off base as to discredit you. The *only* non-secularist revolutionary-political movement today are the Jihadists. Europe gave it up, oh, 600 years ago, give or take a Pope. Non-muslim Asia disavowed theocratic governance at least by the end of World War II. Only Jihadists seeking to force Sharia (sp?) are seeking to distroy civilized society.

      By the way. I am not a Marxist; I am a believer in Christ. But I don't want a "Christian Government" any more than I want an Islam government. I do, however, hope that many in governmental positions would be people of sincere faith. For example: I would hope my teacher in school would pray but I would resist a public school dictated prayer.

      Now I am too long winded, thanks to the hour, and this won;'t be edited down.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    14. Re:Your .sig by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      the *only* non-secularist revolutionary-political movement today are the Jihadists.

      The other one being the religious-nationalist appartheid called Israel. But thats splitting hair. I was not objecting to the fact that Jihadists are indeed religious maniacs but to the lumping of all of the different groups that do fight using guerrilla/terrorist tactics under the banner of "Jihad" on one side and "peace-loving, nice, ever-minding their own business only, secular democracies" on the other. Neither is true.

    15. Re:Your .sig by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1
      Look at the people of palistine: poor Look at people of Iraq: poor Look at the people of Afganistan: poor The only rich countries in the region are the ones we're not fighting. Saudi Arabia: allies Kuwait: allies
      Wait.

      Let me get this straight. You claim the people of Iraq to be poor, and the people of Saudi Arabia to be rich, despite the fact that they're in the SAME DAMN CONDITION? Or did you simply forget that the Saudi Royal family is rich, while the rest of the country is fairly poor, much like Saddam was rich and the rest of the country fairly poor?

      Either way, your arguement holds no water.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    16. Re:Your .sig by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      What holds no water? Are my demographics wrong or my conclusions wrong? Do you really think this is about religion and not money/power/desperation?

      If you want to argue my facts then go for it, I might be wrong about a few of them. But what about my conclusions? Do you really think if these people were rich they'd be blowing themselves up to the same extent they are now?

      You might see a very small amount of religious terrorism if these people had economically decent lives (economically advantaged Christians have shot abortion doctors after all), but you wouldn't see anything like you see in the Middle East today. Osama, Hamas and other groups find huge numbers of people who'll pick strapping on a bomb over living in despair. They wouldn't find nearly as much support if the choice was strapping on bomb or driving an SUV to the Sizzler.

      TW

    17. Re:Your .sig by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1
      Do you really think if these people were rich they'd be blowing themselves up to the same extent they are now?
      THAT'S MY POINT.

      You claimed Saudi Arabia was rich, and thus our allies. Saudi Arabia is the primary source of terrorists in the world, and despite conspiracy theorists claims to the contrary, it's not because the government needs to be overthrown (They hate the terrorists a good amount too... it's costing them money, diplomacy, and to keep on the good side of the world they have to keep oil cheap) but because the Saudi Royal family is keeping the Saudi people poor.

      In that sense, because the base of your arguement it wholely flawed, your conclusions are worthless, as they're based on an incorrect premise.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    18. Re:Your .sig by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      In that sense, because the base of your arguement it wholely flawed, your conclusions are worthless, as they're based on an incorrect premise.

      I know this is an old thread that should be dead, but I couldn't just let this go: Finding a chink in someone's armor does not make their armor useless. Realizing they don't have enough ammo doesn't make their guns non-deadly. A person can make a bunch of wrong turns and still end up in the right place.

      My point about Saudi Arabia may have been mis-stated, but that doesn't make my conclusions worthless because there are plenty of other valid points to be made in my argument's support. Understanding that a person can make a mistake and still be fundementally right may not win you any arguments, but it will help to bring understanding between the parties of a discussion. You'll have to figure out for yourself whether winning arguments or bringing understanding is more important to you.

      TW

    19. Re:Your .sig by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      Building a house on a big clump of clay gets you a worthless house.

      Founding a theory on an incorrect premise gets you less than nothing, because not only were you wrong, you wasted my time as well.

      Sorry.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  156. Depends... why do you need VPC? by MacDork · · Score: 1
    Are you trying to run Windows only software, old software, games?

    Windows only sw: Assuming a Mac equivalent won't do or can't be found, you're probably gonna have to go VPC here. Continue waiting for MS to deliver a G5 compatible version. :-/ Or try Bochs if it can't wait. Likely to be slower than VPC, but better than nothing.

    If old sw: I presume this is to access old files in proprietary formats? If that is the case, get GraphicConverter, Stuffit, MacLinkPlus, and possibly SoundApp on Classic. Those four apps should cover practically every old file format in existence. Some video files will require the use of classic: Indeo 3.2, 4.4, 5.0 and i263 codecs are only available on classic. Most everything else will work fine with QuickTime Player, Video Lan Client (VLC player)/mPlayer, and Real Player on OS X. WMV3 is about the only spot missing. Use Microsoft's WMP for that if you must.

    If games: buy mac games. VPC is a poor gaming platform anyway.

  157. It's a rehash of GetTheCrap anyway by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    they're moving to Windows
    Actually, if you read the articles two links down, you'll find that they're moving from incompetent consultants to competent consultants. One or the other could be using either of Linux or MS-Windows. IRL, most of the incompetents are MCSE (Moron Consultant, Sues Everyone / Must Consult Search Engine / Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert) and so are a large but dwindling number of the competents.

    Interestingly enough, one of the case studies says that the new consultant fixed the customer's reliability woes instantly by moving to a different Linux-based hosting service, then went on to up-sell them an expensive Microsoft solution, about which the PHB "feels better" because it's backed by a giant convicted monopolist - although I'm sure those weren't his exact words.

    If that's the best Microsoft can do in their naked propaganda, they really must be clutching at straws.
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  158. Frustrated people typing with balled fists... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...have trouble distinguishing between menu and modifier keys. That's why MS-Windows is case-blind.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  159. You are not the problem... by dpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's great that you like to use XP on purpose. I'm glad you're happy.

    I simply want the freedom to choose to run Linux. The way Microsoft works, I feel that freedom is threatened.

    It's Microsoft's policies I HATE!!!!!!!

    I used to be an OS/2 user. Microsoft didn't out-compete OS/2 in any technical sort of way. They arm-twisted, cheated, and lied, and there's not much of any other way to put it. OS/2 Warp was competing and winning some amount of market share. One 'opportunity' for OS/2 software was music/midi. A company had a product called "Easy Keys for OS/2" all set to go. Microsoft bought the company before Easy Keys could get to market. Did the product get re-directed to Windows? NO! Microsoft bought the company pure and simple to prevent it from bringing out an OS/2 product. That's only one thing. There were others.

    Consider that per-CPU licensing was struck down in courts, but somehow Microsoft still has some sort of equivalent contract in-place preventing non-Windows preloads. Yes, there are a few non-Windows preloads, few and far between, and if the major brands have one, you have to look alongside the Vogan Interstellar Bypass plans at Alpha Centauri to find them.

    It has become more fashionable on Slashdot to bash people for bashing Microsoft or Microsoft products. I'm going to leave products out of this one, I'm bashing the company. I have seen NOTHING in their conduct, especially as the Linux community starts fearing the DRM and IP attacks, that makes me think there is any improvement whatsoever in Microsoft's Corporate conduct.

    IMHO, Microsoft deserved bashing 10 years ago with the AARD code, they deserve bashing NOW, and for nearly all of that time in-between.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:You are not the problem... by westlake · · Score: 1
      I used to be an OS/2 user. Microsoft didn't out-compete OS/2 in any technical sort of way. They arm-twisted, cheated, and lied, and there's not much of any other way to put it.

      IBM has played corporate hardball since 1914. So why wasn't it out there fighting for OS/2?

    2. Re:You are not the problem... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      IBM makes great products. IBM sucks at marketing, and always has. The only smart thing they have done in marketing is to embrace Linux.

      Microchannel, PS/2, OS/2, etc. All superior products that they could not get enough people to try or were closed and too expensive because they didn't see the marketing advantage to bringing it to the masses.

      I love their products IN SPITE of their ability to market them properly.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:You are not the problem... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Dunno, I'm not IBM.

      But I do know that IBM is like any other big company, including Microsoft. There are many factions, and they don't all work together, all the time. The split between the PC hardware people and the OS/2 people was well-known in the industry, at the time.

      Plus even though IBM "won" its antitrust suit, in another way it lost, because its conduct was changed. Even though Microsoft "lost" its antitrust suit, it really won, at least partly because of the administration change. But at the end of the day, it's conduct didn't really change. IMHO the only thing holding Microsoft's conduct in any sort of check is the EU.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  160. How you say...? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    DosBox: DOS sans CtrlAltDel, plus multiple instances and remote access.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:How you say...? by anubi · · Score: 1
      Exactly! That is why I was so comfortable using DOS tools.

      I have known for a long time that I was going to have to leave the Microsoft operating environments because I had work to do... I could not spend a helluva lot of time farting around with my tools. I feel if I stay with a Microsoft system, I will become like a gardener who spends all day trying to get his fancy power saw to cut a branch off a tree, and having to compete with the neighbor kid with a simple bow saw which would go through the branch in three minutes. Sure the power saw could do it in three milliseconds, but it may take three hours to get the saw to work! Yes, great if you do the same thing day after day and can use the economies of scale of mass production, but I do all sorts of different stuff. Anything. Mechanical, electrical, analog, digital, embedded processors/code, power/power conversion, optics, RF, even some chemistry. Its all physics and to me, all fun. Playing around in God's playground of physics law is rewarding to me cause God doesn't change the rules all the time. Bill Gates does. A sound knowledge of the way Bill Gates does things is rendered moot on the next release of code, but a good sound knowledge on how things work is nearly perfectly integral - that is you can safely build on your foundations of skill without having it systematically rendered moot by a new release of physical laws.

      Incidentally, I intend to finally give up my DOS tools and migrate to Eagle, which runs on Linux.

      From what I have perceived, Eagle has been the first company out there I can consider as having a product robust enough to last. The rest, albeit expensive, I consider "fly-by-night" as the companies who preceded them. Endless acquisitions and mergers, but who knows what will be compatible with what in a couple of years. If you are trying to build a computational infrastructure that will be functional for conceivably centuries, you can't use components whose lifetime is designed to expire in years.

      I never said the systems will deliver state-of-the-art performance in ten years, but they should still work at the same performance they were designed to. My half-century old air compressor still does.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  161. Dear Unix... by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1


    Warning: Unknown(/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in Unknown on line 0

    Warning: (null)(): Failed opening '/usr/www/users/salcan/index.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in Unknown on line 0

    The grass is always greener on the other side..

  162. Re: XP by choice by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Anyways I think people aren't "just" waking up to Windows being insecure, unstable etc. It's just that they are willing to live with it rather than investigate alternate OS"

    That and both points are heavily sensationalized over here. I run XP and 2K across several different computers. The general assumption here is that I spend hours a week dealing with viruses. I don't. I haven't been exploited in months. And, the one time I did, it was because I had a fresh install of XP out on the net sans firewall or a service pack. Doh.

    The other assumption is that I spend lots of time rebooting. Nope. My machines get rebooted once every two weeks or so. This is laughable compared to Linux, but virtually nothing in terms of practical time used. Back in the Windows 95/98 days, this was a legit complaint. (3 or 4 reboots a DAY) Today, though, it's just not enough time to notice. I'm 'living with it' about as disturbingly as living with wrong number phonecalls.

    So, by relieving myself of those problems with Linux, I'm not gaining a whole hell of a lot. I would, however, rack up a bunch of Google time trying to figure out how to make everything work. Linux is just going to have to do better than that to get people to switch. This has nothing to do with people having mixed up priorities.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  163. Three Linux installs this week by NullProg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, I haven't read the article. Sounds like a rant though. I've done three Linux installs this week. Two SuSE 9.1, and one Gentoo.

    One USB scanner problem (SuSE 9.1). All Dual-Boot except for the Gentoo one (He has so many trojans/viri XP is useless on his six month old Dell Laptop). All are using KDE 3x.

    So far, everyone is happy/content. Linux not ready for the desktop my ass.

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  164. Still, MS-Office is not a standard by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    OpenOffice, on the other hand, is a real standard being adhered to by an ever-increasing number of tools.

    As a bonus, the suite also deals with the MS-Office non-standards pretty well (lots of people are using it today simply because it was able to recover corrupted MS-Office documents for them), and writes files in several other standard formats (PDF, HTML without the crap, PNG, yadda yadda).

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  165. Dear server, by acariquara · · Score: 1
    Goodbye and die a horrible death.

    (rejoices and watches the 'puter burst into flames)

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  166. Spot the desperado? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Have a warm, relaxing bath and see if he twitching stops.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  167. Never use elsewhere? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    So hand them a CD.

    It costs about AUD$0.40 in eaches something less than 30 US cents), you can be pretty sure it'll run on whatever they've got at home, there are no macro viruses and no signing away of your firstborn in blood before you start, nor mortgaging of the house if you miscount users, machines or CPUs.

    Try that with MS-Office.

    The other question is: what training?

    I have one customer who uses MS-Office extensively (he calls his operating system "Word"), and he didn't notice any difference in OpenOffice except that the templates weren't there. In fact, since the machine had an empty document open full-screen when he walked up to it, he didn't even realise it wasn't MS-Word on MS-Windows.

    There are fundamental differences between the packages, but 90% of your users will never stumble over them.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Never use elsewhere? by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      According to MS, if you are licensed Office at work, you are licensed office at home... It's per user and not per machine.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
  168. No, Solid as in. . . by WinterpegCanuck · · Score: 1
    . . . a finished product. I too have both *nix and windows boxes for different tasks and as much as I love linux for servers, for end users and day to day things, windows just has that polished edge. All security and bug issues aside, they have the formula that a lot of distros miss out on: One text editor, One paint program, One media player and One browser (as evil as the last two are). As much as the proponents of linux proclaim it is all about choice, the average user doesn't really need five different text editors, three browsers or two GUI's. People always compain about Windows and it's size, but last time I did a default install of RH, two CD's and over a gig later, it dawned on me that win 2k can be installed in under 500 MB.

    Now despite playing the devils advocate above, I am a lover of linux, and yes, there are some distros that are getting a much more refined finish to them, but I personally still see linux as more of a specialized tech OS or a server room product. It's the difference between playing an european, unfinished game ported to english by a valuesoft company or a complete game where years after the release, say early 90's, you can still find people modding and using it. There are people that still use Win 9x and Mac OS < 10 because they were finished products for their time. How many people still use RH 5.2 (slackware users aside ;-) instead of upgrading to the newest hoping it would do and support the things they wanted.

    I like linux and would really like to see it become more predominant, but with sooooo many flavours, choices and ways to skin a cat, the average user gets lost in the shuffle. Lindows is doing a great job in trying to produce a finished product, but still offers a few too many choices and just recently took this approach (plus costs money, which turns off a lot of the cheap skates that came to linux only because it was free, not because they thought it could do more). Make the initial install include one text editor, a simple RTF editor (and just the basics, like MS Paint as opposed to an adobe photoshop clone) and provide on a second disk the catalogue of all sorts to customize for those that want, and the option to not make a choice for those that really do not like making choices. MS Might be evil, but they realized this formula a long time ago.

    Welcome to market research, not just marketing.

    1. Re:No, Solid as in. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they picked the biggest market sector on the planet to market to. . . . idiots and their friends. (and pointy haired bosses)

    2. Re:No, Solid as in. . . by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I like linux and would really like to see it become more predominant, but with sooooo many flavours, choices and ways to skin a cat, the average user gets lost in the shuffle.

      So you're suggesting that users now are far more stupid than users in the 80's, when Microsoft was just another choice?

      Lindows is doing a great job in trying to produce a finished product

      No, it isn't; it's a piece of junk, and it isn't called "Lindows" anymore and hasn't been for some time. Are you astroturfing?

      Make the initial install include one text editor, a simple RTF editor . . .

      The Windows way is not necessarily the right way. Choice is a Good Thing (TM).

      MS Might be evil, but they realized this formula a long time ago.

      What MS realized a long time ago was that using proprietary formats locks in customers.

      Welcome to market research, not just marketing.

      Welcome back to MS marketing, which is all buzzwords. Enjoy your "rich" experience with the "rich" features of Windows, and of course for Windows programmers, there is a "rich" API. One has to wonder why the main selling point for MS these days always includes the word "rich".

  169. Linux can make it simpler than that. by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Set OpenOffice to be your window manager, and set your display manager to auto login.

    The sequence of events is: turn on computer, it boots, logs you in and there you are facing an empty word-processor document, full screen. Nothing to minimise, close, or otherwise stuff around with, all you can do is word-process or exit.

    Try that with MS-Windows.

    If you want your customer to multi-process, rip everything but task-switching and a menu dock out of one of the simpler WMs. No chrome, no bells and whistles, one simple floating menu of applications and running tasks. How much can you rip out of the MS-Windows interface?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  170. Re: XP by choice by modernbob · · Score: 1

    I have to admit that I pretty much agree with your view. I run a small ISP. Servers I use Openna (a specialized version of redhat). It's simply the best server OS I have ever used but again it's totally customized and very secure. Windows was never an option for the server environment. I run it non-GUI and the last time I rebooted Was when the power went due to some serious work on the substation in town. However, as a desktop OS Linux needs some serious help. A good for instance is I dual boot this machine I am typing on. I have redhat EL and loaded up firefox and thunderbird. One day I discovered that firefox doesn't properly handle mailto references. After 3 hours on google and IRC I got it to sort of work properly. What I am getting at is that until the general public can make linux usable (for totally clueless) it will NEVER gain traction on the desktop. Most general users are going to give up trying to fix anything in 30 minutes. Most windows users wouldn't even try! I'm not so sure that trying to make Linux as easy to use as windows is a great idea. Making a windows like file system and using windows like networking will ruin a good deal of Linux strengths. I don't believe that Linux needs to destroy windows. In fact it would be a good idea for MS to do things like port Office to Linux. I am still more productive using word and excel than I am using OO. However, the reason I dual boot is there are a lot of free programming tools and compilers available for linux. I like having both OS's around. Windows I can run Quickbooks for the business and play 1942 and Linux can do all the real computing stuff! Whats the problem?

  171. this is how i see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i look at it this way. microsoft uses games to warp the minds of people so they dont relise the OS sucks, the same way the US government uses football to distract people from that fact that they destroyed the WTC not terrorists

  172. Re: XP by choice by Squozen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe you've had your head in the sand (or elsewhere) during the last couple of years, but the majority of the best PC games come out for the Mac these days. I stopped using my PC completely about 6 months ago when I quit EverQuest and switched across to my PowerBook which is coping just fine, thanks for asking.

    I finally got around to buying Warcraft 3 the other day, so I could get more of a feel for the WC world before World of Warcraft goes into open beta. To tide me over I'll be buying KotOR and Homeworld 2 this month, don't tell the missus... oh, and the Call of Duty expansion is due in November.

    To repeat: Plenty of games for the Mac, please return to your spyware scanning.

  173. Re: XP by choice by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    The problem is the zealots. I have Slackware Linux and Windows XP both installed on this computer. I've spent too much time trying to iron out the problems I've had with things like upgrading XOrg6.7.0 to 6.8.1 (only to go back to 6.7.0) and trying to get Wine (and later WineX CVS) to work, only to find out that I still can't get some of my favorite games (like You Don't know Jack: The Ride) installed. But hey, for everything other than gaming, what I have is a solid system. Is OpenOffice as good as MS office? Not by any means. Granted, I'd much rather have Office XP or Office 2000 ported to Linux than the latest release (I'm against having everything built into the sidebar, I like having the popup dictionary/thesaurus, little things like that.) My 2 main complaints about OpenOffice: you'll never be able to get the first-line indentation tab perfectly at any length (You'll get close, but it doesn't snap, which would be very helpful) and the thesaurus just lumps anything that's similar in the same category, it doesn't break up by different subjects. But other than that, what I have is a computer where if it's booted into Linux, my mom can use KDE and have it run just like it would if she were in Windows, except she just can't install programs like Ikea planners &c. But I concur, Linux is not ready for prime-time yet, and I currently think it will always be a niche group composed of different reasons. There's some that are purly anti-Microsoft. I'm not one of those, I acknowledge what they've managed to do well (previous versions of Office), but I don't feel any dedication to stay with them. The main reason why I use Linux is because I like its potential. I like being able to have a webserver up and running as soon as I install the OS. I like being able to upgrade a component like the webserver or the FTP server, and not having it break the whole system because they're not built into the system. I also like how the market's small enough that we're not being exploited like Microsoft's market is by crackers. Most of all, if a program doens't work, I can troubleshoot it much more easily than I can in Windows.

  174. Re:WOW! A dead php box. That'll show Windows! Pfff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Linux, Windows, Apache, IIS. Without an admin with skill, that is typical.

  175. Re:Breaking up with the hot chick to date the nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Figures, the analogy holds, anyways...The interface is sexy, has no brains, and she goes down on you quite regularly.....

  176. Re: XP by choice by TeraCo · · Score: 1
    Sure, you get all the big generic stuff. But the big generic stuff is crap these days, as they make it for XBOX, PS2 and whatever else they can put it on.

    I really do hope that the mac gets good games like Dawn of War ported over, because I have mac using friends who I want to play more games, but I'm not sure how likely that is.

    --
    Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  177. Look harder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for some real hypocrisy

    DU

    Freeps

    dare to compare with /.

    I think we do pretty good here really

  178. Re: XP by choice by cybersaga · · Score: 0

    I second this. Last month I formatted (finally) and decided to install both Linux (SuSE 9.1) and Windows XP. I am no Microsoft loyalist, but... Most of my time in Linux was trying to figure out how to make things work (screen resolution, mouse wheel, installing programs).
    Linux has a great potential, I will never argue that. I'm not going to nuke my Linux half. In fact I'll probably explore a few other distros. But Linux has a long way to go before it's on most desktops.

  179. Re:Dear Internet, IE by cybersaga · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't touch Norton with a 10-foot pole either.

  180. Re:Dear Anonymous Bastard, by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    Shhh!!! Not so loud, or they'll all want me!

  181. Not for the Home User by suresk · · Score: 1

    Whether or not this is a good thing, security and reliability will not be the #1 deciding factor for most average people. Even if reliability were extremely important to the home user, XP is quite reliable for the average home user. I'm sitting here, imagining my mother - who probably doesn't know the difference between Internet Explorer and Google - figure out how to 'compile' the program she wants to install. I'm trying to figure out what my dad would do if he couldn't use any of his geneology programs, or what my sisters would do if they couldn't play 'The Sims'. Putting Linux on a home desktop PC sets things back 10 years or more to the average user - the PC is just a geeky, complicated device that nobody except nerds would know how to use. I use Linux on a daily basis and like it, but people like my parents would find a PC equipped with it to be rather useless.

  182. Re:Dear Internet, fuck me by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

    You will be fucked, resistance is futile. You are a troll and will have a virus, malware or buffer overflow before the years end. You are such a moron that you will just think it is time to re-install windows...

    Fuck You Moron!

    --
    Your Average Joe
  183. Re: XP by choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You quit EverQuest?!

    I thought I was the only one.

  184. Ah, so if I install a shared machine... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...I need to buy two or more licences for MS-Office? Nice.

    How about at home? Since if I'm licenced to use it at work, I'm licenced to use it at home, no? So I can legitimately install it at home for free.

    Now my teenage daughter sits down and uses my home copy, once, to make a price-list for her lemonade stand (ie a commercial venture) - am I liable for an extra licence?

    How about if I install a copy at home for my use on "her" machine, is that OK?

    And if I'm licenced to use it at home, does that cover work as well?

    How about if a computer at work has twenty people use it for five minutes each, every day, to update a log. Do I now need to buy 20 licences for that copy of Office?

    These rules aren't very clear, people generally just double-licence things anyway, and they cease to be a problem if I just use OpenOffice instead.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  185. Re:It's a Marriage of convenience anyways... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    I don't want a computer that dual boots for the same reason I don't want a wife with two personalities.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  186. Nice Gesture from MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our affair took its next serious step on August 24, 1995"

    (Yes i RTFA)

    In Australia the first 500(?) babies born got a free copy of 95 and a about 500 bucks? Pretty good, IMHO. We got a new PC and stuck with Windows 3.1 and eventually ventured to Windows 95 ;)

  187. Re: XP by choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other assumption is that I spend lots of time rebooting. Nope. My machines get rebooted once every two weeks or so. This is laughable compared to Linux, but virtually nothing in terms of practical time used. Back in the Windows 95/98 days, this was a legit complaint. (3 or 4 reboots a DAY) Today, though, it's just not enough time to notice.

    I'll agree with you (or anyone else saying it's virtually nothing), the day you (or the other guys) agree to let me send you an invoice every time my work XP machine needs a reboot.

    Btw, I'm aware that there may be other ways of fixing it than just rebooting, but until it gets userfriendly enough that I can actually figure out how, any such suggestions will be met with an invoice for hiring an MCSE to fix it.

  188. Re: XP by choice by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "I'll agree with you (or anyone else saying it's virtually nothing), the day you (or the other guys) agree to let me send you an invoice every time my work XP machine needs a reboot."

    A friend of mine used to have a crappy machine that needed rebooting all the time. Stupid thing crashed if you just looked at it wrong. A motheroard replacement fixed that.

    Sounds like Linux is more fault tolerant. Kudos to them for making it so and all, but my initial reaction is "fix your computer".

    I'll give you partial credit, though, if you've been running Windows for a while. After a few months, it starts to 'rot' and needs to be reinstalled. Though I enjoy the occasional spring cleaning on my machine, I still grit my teeth that this is really necessary. Stupid registry.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  189. Re: XP by choice by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    d'oh. Silly lack of two letters.

    UNstated. UNstated. As in "implied." As in "even a screwball can catch this."

    Does he have to specify that it display a language he can read?

  190. Re:No, I'm New Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHH touche.

    nice job :-)

    (i laugh loudly and the lameness filter doesn't like it very much)

  191. Re: XP by choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "To repeat: Plenty of games for the Mac"

    Do you live in an alternate universe? Where I come from (any of the local electronics / software stores) the entire Mac section fits into the PC Games section. OK, well, not including hardeware. Yeah, some games get ported eventually. But seriously. Software available on PC >> Software available on Mac.

  192. Re: XP by choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Linux is just going to have to do better than that to get people to switch."

    I run WinXP by choice. I will switch when Windows' security gets too good and the most recent Windows version I can pirate gets out of date. I think this is when most people will go. I think Microsoft probably knows it, and so won't make Windows completely un-pirateable in the near future.

  193. I think you missed the point by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    There is nothing ( nothing ) about what you said were benefits that could not have been done without IE being integrated. By integrated, the original post was talking about the intermingling of OS land with a user application.

    Time to display window on my machine, firefox was a touch faster than IE. ( Firefox 0.9, IE 6.0 )

    Unscientific as the day is long, so I did it multiple times ( data is the plural of anecdote, right :-)

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  194. Try reading more carefully... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    ....because in the very next sentence after the one you quote I state:

    At work--well--I just have to deal with it (customer is always right you know--besides there is always "classic mode")

    So yes, I am quite aware that you can turn off the gummy-bear mode. It still infuriates me, however that although most stuff reverts back to a sane state, there are still just enough differences when you get down into the system menus, etc to drive one insane. The fact that classic isn't the default mode is annoying enough. It was a big mistake on MSes part to focus on the visual and completely ignore real usability (the new start menu for example, was a collosal failure in UI design). It's as if they used WMP and winamp people to do the UI.

    The most insidious thing, of course, it that "designed for XP" type software (from both MS and third parties) has taken to imitating the GUI-by-Mattel and in most cases it is difficult or impossible to avoid it. Even on older OSes for example, we are inflicted with Windows Media Player 9's crap by default, and scanner and digital camera software packages are some of the worst offenders (there is no way to avoid the eye candy on that crap so I've taken to installing the minimum possible software to make them work--some cameras are great--they work like jumpdrives and need no software at all and just appear as another drive).

    Anyways...with all this and increasingly confusing license agreements and anti-piracy activation schemes, as well as an ever worsening virus problem has led me to never buy another Microsoft product again for my own machines--unless perhaps I purchase an XBox and/or games. Win2k and Office2k are the least broken and I'll stick with them until they are useless, at which time I'll be a full time Linux user.

  195. Re:Dear Linux... by lothie · · Score: 1

    *giggle* You're so cute.

  196. Re:I still use [DOS]. Daily. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For schematic capture, PCB layout, and cross-assembler/DSP C/C++ stuff. ...They all have user definable libraries

    Please specify.

    gewg_

  197. Re:I still use [DOS]. Daily. by anubi · · Score: 1
    Schematic Capture = Futurenet Dash-2

    PCB Layout = PADS 7 for DOS ( Last DOS release )

    ( Yes, it once had a dongle, but being the dongle was incompatible with the newer high-speed parallel ports, I had to fix it because they wouldn't - I had *bought* the software, so by golly I had to protect my investment. It was the frustration of removing that damned thing that taught me the value of the sales term "customer support", as I felt I, like the software I had purchased, had been abandoned. They were just using it as a hook to reel me in once I took the bait, so they could make me pay again and again and again for the same thing. I am an older guy and used to the idea that once a trade is made, they have my money, and I have the product, and both lose subsequent control over it. I feel they have no rights to tell me how to use their product anymore than I have any right to tell them how they can spend the money I paid for it. However I will respect their copyright. Its their product to sell, not mine. My product is what I do using their product. )

    But going around behind my back devising ways to render my investment in their product moot to force me to buy again to me smacked of me going around behind their back to cancel my check, rendering it moot, and then trying to force them into negotiations again for more business. I wouldn't expect them to stand for it, but apparently they expected *me* to stand for it. But in my case, I just got madder than hell, and vowed to really watch those sweet-talking suit guys.

    And C/C++/DSP = Borland TurboC++ for DOS. I love that old compiler. Fast little bugger. And so simple I don't fart around all day trying to set things up... just a quickie definition of how to set up my variable types and away I go. Kinda lousy for presentations, but really great for quickie algorithm testing as I can easily hook anything in my machine. Really nice for my wirewrap test cards when I just use the address/data bus in my machine just to talk to it.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  198. Re: XP by choice by Smurf · · Score: 1

    Well, not stating those two letters certainly threw me off... ;)
    But now I see your point.

    On the other hand, as a very poor international student who decided to make a huge investment in a PowerBook after using mainly PCs for more than five years (and some Unix Workstations but no Macs at all), I must say that yes, he should specify that he needs an OS that runs on his current computer.

    By the way, the PB was the best buying decision I have made in my life.

  199. Re:I just got madder than hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm with you.

    On an ironic note, as I respond, the QotD at the bottom of the /. page is
    "Any program which runs right is obsolete."

    gewg_

  200. Re:and migrate to EAGLE, which runs on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used Cadsoft's Easily Applicable Graphical Layout Editor and I agree it is powerful and very affordable.

    Since you are not averse to Linux, you may want to investigate the gratis and libre apps gEDA and PCB.
    I haven't used them but I saw a page that Terry Porter put up that was impressive.
    (His server is down now.)

    Posts by the authors of each app:
    Ales Hvezda, gEDA
    DJ Delorie, PCB

    gewg_

  201. Not everyone has a choice.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    That's OK for end users (well, OK, clued up ones), and indeed I do not use anything Microsoft at all other than for some games for the children (and only then if they dont run under Wine or Win4Lin).

    However, if you read my post it should be obvious that I meant the irritation to reside especially with those who run systems for a living. The amazing thing is that, during recruitment, great store is made of experience and qualifications and training, but after they have joined the organisation that knowledgebase is never allowed to offer an opinion that doesn't fit in with the 'corporate norm'.

    Instead, the PHB attends some vendor sponsored golfing event and comes back all glossy eyed because he 'got the facts' but with some rather important omissions like cost of downtime, patches, enfin, see previous post.

    And guess who takes the hit if it doesn't work as the brochure said? Yup - it's you who will be babysitting those boxes and eventually forcibly decide to make a restart a daily feature instead of something you do annually (when you feel like it) just to clear out some potential dead wood.

    Choice is not what proprietary vendors want you to have, and they are intelligent enough to go up to a level that is devoid of the requisite knowledge to actually take an informed decision. And naturally, the salesman gets listened to because he is less biased than the internal staff who will be outsourced shortly (after all, it's cheaper to have some call centre on the other end of the planet read you a script starting with "did you reboot" than it is to have someone with a brain doing preventitive maintenance and prevent problems rather than fixing them after it has costed the company money in lost productivity).

    The more I think about it, the more I think that teaching board levels at least some basic IT understanding could add serious money to the bottom line. But I fear this will not happen as it would upset the proprietary apple cart too much.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  202. Dear Microsoft Windows,(revamped) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Microsoft Windows,

    I honestly can't live without you, you entertain me like no other. Though it takes extensive relationship counselling, removal of all your "friends", and a lot of acceptance on my part. You are the only one who plays all those coy little games with me. I don't mind your lack of security as without it I would probably be forced to wait tables for a living. Behind closed doors you know how to please me, yet when I want to go out, you have only limited resistance to my flirtations with my freaky girl on the side linux. I will never leave you(for more than a couple hours) unless linux learns to do more than just surf on our dates. Don't ever change, even if I leave you there will always be a job for you with my employer and therefore we can always be friends.
    Sincerely,
    Your system administrator

  203. Sucker, with no self esteem. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Most people stick with Windows because it's there and it takes effort to get something better.

    That's what Windows says, sucker. It's just another lie. Try Mepis, Knoppix, Debian Sarge or Fedora when she's not looking or when she has the inevitable nervous breakdown on you again. Mepis and Knoppix are discreet and that whore will never know.

    Get a major PC manufacturer to start shipping some dual boot systems and see how well it fares...

    You don't even want to know what a bitch she is to manufacturers. Let's just say that it's heroic of them to even talk about another OS.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  204. Twitter: Life and times of a petulant cock-gobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter, you're a petulant cock-gobbling sycophant to Linux Torvaldyos! Quit taking DP from ESR and RMS's feculent cocks and why don't you try to stop sucking quite so much? Get out of your parents' basement and see the real world - maybe then you'll see how pathetic you sound, with your neverending stream of bullshit about how Microsoft is stalking you. Wasn't it you who said that Microsoft believes your insane ranting is actually a threat to them, so they PAY PEOPLE to reply to you on Slashdot? No sir, I don't get any money. I do it for the love. Someone has to go up against your paranoid whining. So get back in your cage and shut the fuck up already.