Slashdot Mirror


Neopets Gambling Controversy

Neopoet writes "Players of the online virtual pet game Neopets (claims 70 million pet owners worldwide) have gone nuts against an Australian current affairs show called Today Tonight after the show ran segments railing against the Neopets for introducing children to gambling. Click below to read on. It started when McDonalds Australia included a Neopets plush toy with every kids' Happy Meal in Australia, directing kids to the Neopets website.

To "feed" their pets, Neopets players have to win points in a variety of mini-games, including versions of poker and blackjack. Australia has a high rate of gambling problems with poker machines ("pokies"), so when a mother discovered her nine-year-old playing online poker to feed his virtual pet, she approached Today Tonight claiming McDonalds was setting her son up for a life of gambling addiction.

TT aired the story Parents not McHappy over pokie toy and the Neopets message boards went nuts. Meanwhile McDonalds heavied Neopets into banning Australians from the gambling games. Today Tonight must have received a lot of hate mail because the next night came Neopet players fight McDonalds ban, featuring interviews with adult Neopets addicts. But this only increased the outrage on the Neopets boards - they're now trying to squash rumors of McDonalds withdrawing sponsorship altogether, and Neopets shutting down."

354 comments

  1. Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... featuring interviews with adult Neopets addicts...

    Umm... if ADULTS are getting addicted to Neopets, I think, most likely, that's the least of their problems....

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by ideatrack · · Score: 5, Funny

      Umm... if ADULTS are getting addicted to Neopets, I think, most likely, that's the least of their problems....

      Yeah exactly, I wish I had the time to play this, but what with shooting up heroin, performing drive by shootings and paying prostitutes for sex, I just don't have the time.

    2. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, why can't people just get addicted to something normal, like sex or gambling?

    3. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      "Umm... if ADULTS are getting addicted to Neopets, I think, most likely, that's the least of their problems...."

      That's not funny, it's insightful!
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you RTFA? it IS gambling!
      besides, studies show that addiction is general and once you get addicted to one thing you are likely to get addicted to other things.

    5. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      "...featuring interviews with adult Neopets addicts..."

      I believe that's "adult Neopets."

      As in, Neopet pr0n. Reminds me of the Furbisexual craze a few years back.

    6. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Reminds me of the Furbisexual craze a few years back.

      You mean that was just a fad?

    7. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      No, it's playing poker for imaginary petfood.

    8. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't pay the prostitutes. Problem solved.

    9. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by secolactico · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't pay the prostitutes. Problem solved.

      Why not? According to my behavior guidance system (also known as Grand Theft Auto), you can always shoot them afterwards and get your money back.

      --
      No sig
    10. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Main Entry: gamble

      1 a : to play a game for money or property b : to bet on an uncertain outcome
      2 : to stake something on a contingency : take a chance

    11. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by davesplace1 · · Score: 1

      Let's blame all of our problems on cute Neopets, then we don't have to take the blame for our problems. I'm off to play online poker, the most boring game ever invented.

    12. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm addicted to GTA: Vice City too... :-(

    13. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by eam · · Score: 1

      Must be nice to live in a place where people have the time and strength to worry about "Neopet addiction"

    14. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by hazem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's where Mr. Pimp comes in. He might look all flashy and pretty, but he's a businessman. He doesn't take kindly to you cutting off a source of his cash-flow, and probably wouldn't have a problem cutting off stuff from you as well.

      You don't think these girls hook up with Pimps because they like doing what they do for money and then give it to someone else. They get protection of sorts, so it's usually a bad idea to double-cross or harm a hooker you haven't paid to harm.

    15. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I think the obvious answer for a well balanced life is do the pimping and dealing yourself, make some money into the bargain.

    16. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by jpetts · · Score: 4, Funny

      "There's many, many different species and they're all based on real things, like a Lupe is a dog, a Scorchio is a dragon," Jacqui said.

      And if they think dragons are real, they've got problems as well...

      Oh, wait: this is /.

      Yeah, dragons'n'orcs'n'hobbits, all real, yeah, real!

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    17. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      If that's your behaviour guidance system, your sex only lasts about a minute anyway, so it's not like you're spending too much time with prostitutes in the first place.

    18. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by hazem · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can alsmost see a "be your own boss" infomercial coming on!

    19. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Maul · · Score: 1

      So you're playing GTA: San Andreas rather than Neopets?

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    20. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      you can always shoot them afterwards and get your money back.

      Ah, but this is what takes time away from the Neopet addiction you could start working on. Just Findum, Fuckum, and Flee, so you can feed your pet.

    21. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by julesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Findum, Fuckum, and Flee

      That sounds like a good name for a firm of lawyers.

    22. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah, but it ain't easy.

    23. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Reminds me of the Furbisexual craze a few years back

      There are some things I am so glad to be ignorant of. In my little world, "Furby" is a stuffed animal-thing that makes noises. I don't even want to think about what is implied by a word like "furbisexual".

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    24. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by jonnystiph · · Score: 1

      Why not? According to my behavior guidance system (also known as Grand Theft Auto), you can always shoot them afterwards and get your money back.

      Shooting? Nahhh, your guidance system is skewed, the only real way to get your money back is with a melee weapon, preferably something with an edge, this helps in not attracting police attention as well.

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

    25. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      The only time I've ever heard that word was from The Onion. It's funny when it's in The Onion; it's disturbing when you discover websites about it. *shudder*

    26. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, if you define "sex" as "sitting next to a woman in a car while it's rocking".

    27. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      Because we all know that ADULTS should be getting addicted to more 'grown up' games such as GTA.

    28. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by ronaldb64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do I get the feeling the SCO group already has them hired....?

      --
      There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    29. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Sort of remeniscent of the power hierarchy in the US:

      Bush, Dick and Colin

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    30. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by FredaReilly · · Score: 1

      Beleive me, Neopets *is* the least of my problems - and I have a few. Neopets is a great site. It is free, it is fun, and a bit of escapism that hurts no one.

    31. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by SlartibartfastJunior · · Score: 1

      the article conveniently ignores the Neopian Stock Exchange, where you can learn about investing, among other quality games . . . I've been playing this for years (I'm 23) and it's a great time-waster. How is playing with a pink alien animal pet addictive?

    32. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by Lesrahpem · · Score: 2

      I have to say, I actually live with one of said addicts, my girlfriend's mother. She plays the game at least 12 hours a day, and talks about nothing but Neopets. She is 64 years old.

      At one point her account was frozen because they thought she was using an automated program to buy things in the games. She was so upset over it she actually cried.

      In my opinion, there are a lot more things wrong with Neopets than the obvious. I think the games actually have a serious potential to traumatize young children. It takes a long time (so I hear) to accumulate enough points in the game to actually do much. The games become more of a chore than something fun. So you work for months, literally, to get the points you want, and then it suddenly dissapears due to some monster or another randomly stealing your stuff.

      That happens frequently enough that I'd be willing to bet it causes some sort of complex in children over a long period of time, making them think that working for anything is pointless because it'll just randomly dissappear.

    33. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by servognome · · Score: 1

      Simpsons quote:
      "Yeah boy, haven't I told you that vampires are make-believe just like elves, gremlins and Eskimos"

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    34. Re:Adult Neopet Addicts?!?! by hookedup · · Score: 1

      yeah, they could at least steam the windows up or something so they could not be seen..

  2. Alternatives.. by D-Cypell · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least an 8-hour poker and blackjack session is a good way to keep the kids from viewing hardcore pornography or reading slashdot.

    1. Re:Alternatives.. by mgoss · · Score: 1

      ... or reading slashdot.

      But that's a good thing!

      Let's make /. toys, include them in every happy meal, give the kids a url to slahsdot and what'll we have?

      More geeks of course!

      (in the same way there are more gambling addicts because of McDonalds neopet toys...)

    2. Re:Alternatives.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least an 8-hour poker and blackjack session is a good way to keep the kids from viewing hardcore pornography

      damn, you mean they don't have hentia versions of the games where you get a girl naked as you win hands and then get the whole shebang at the end?

      what a rip.

    3. Re:Alternatives.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one wish that my parents had introduced me to gambling and hardcore pornography, instead of letting me lead myself to a wasted life reading slashdot.

    4. Re:Alternatives.. by druhol · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure I want a plush Cowboy Neal, thankyou.

      --
      WWD4D?
    5. Re:Alternatives.. by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I want a plush Cowboy Neal, thankyou.

      Wouldn't that be a Cowboy Neal furry?

    6. Re:Alternatives.. by accelleron · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      Does McDonalds really need a generation of people that can sue it for obscure reasons AND make valid arguments?

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    7. Re:Alternatives.. by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      No girlfriend, huh? It will come...

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
  3. Dreidel by 2.7182 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess we should take dreidels and dice away from all kids. So much for monopoly....

    1. Re:Dreidel by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Monopoly teaches good money management otherwise you go bankrupt. Neopets is just teaching kids to "PLAY OUR GAMES NOW OR YOUR PET WILL DIE" to help along the addiction.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Dreidel by Feminist-Mom · · Score: 0

      Actually, you may be joking, but I don't think Mormon or Muslim children can play games with dice.

    3. Re:Dreidel by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually we should point them to first person shooter games.

      My two kids and my wife play NeoPets, although my wife and son play it more than my daughter. My son has actually become pretty good at buying/finding items and selling them for profit. He's figured out the economics of the game. They all enjoy the game challenges, but if gambling is really that much of a concern, we'd have to ban quite a few sites that offer gambling style games. Guess the kid orientation of the site is causing the problem, but in my opinion, responsible parents should be checking what their kids are doing online. Parents should make the decision on their own to allow/disallow access rather than trying to take the site down. Parents should allow/disallow their children from accessing certain sites based on their own values and the maturity of their kids.

    4. Re:Dreidel by jrmann1999 · · Score: 1
      I wholeheartedly agree with the parent poster. To quote the summary

      so when a mother discovered her nine-year-old playing online poker to feed his virtual pet


      The key word here is "online." This is yet another example of a Mother too busy with her own personal social life to actually involve herself in the rearing of her children. Since when did it become a mandate that her child had to have the neopet from McDonalds? Last time I looked the Internet was a pretty menacing place for children that are using it UNSUPERVISED. Get a grip and tell your kid NO! for once.
    5. Re:Dreidel by Kaa · · Score: 1

      Monopoly teaches good money management otherwise you go bankrupt. Neopets is just teaching kids to "PLAY OUR GAMES NOW OR YOUR PET WILL DIE" to help along the addiction.

      LOL. If anything, poker teaches much better money management than Monopoly.

      Not to mention that the point of games is to entertain, not teach complicated real-life skills...

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    6. Re:Dreidel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your pets NEVER die; they stay hungry.

      They are NEVER taken from you.

      If you don't log in for a year or so, the account and your pets are removed from the system. Neopets is a free-standing society and economy. You, sir, have never played.

    7. Re:Dreidel by KeeperS · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that your pets never die. Ever. Even if you don't feed them for a year or more, they'll be starving to death, but not dead, when you come back.

      In a way, that's almost worse. Somebody convinced me to play Neopets, and I did for about two days. But I found most of the games boring, so I stopped. Now I have some Neopet out there who will be suffering starvation for all eternity because I don't remember my username or password.

      I do have to say, though... anybody seriously worrying about gambling problems and Neopets probably hasn't played Neopets.

    8. Re:Dreidel by arodland · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right, because in the real world we get $200 every time we pass "GO."

    9. Re:Dreidel by eln · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, that may be the most ludicrous thing I've ever read.

      I grew up Mormon, and we had plenty of games with dice. The Mormon church even says that board games (most of which use dice) are a good way to spend time with your family. The church does forbid gambling for money, but there is nothing against playing games that employ dice.

      As for Muslims, the Kuran forbids games of chance, or games in which you can gain money or some other benefit purely by chance (getting things too easily). It mentions dice specifically as an example, but whether that means gambling with dice (like craps) or all games involving dice is open to interpretation.

      In the most extreme sects of either religion, you may find people that forbid playing with dice for any reason, but certainly not in the mainstream doctrine.

    10. Re:Dreidel by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      the point of games is to entertain, not teach complicated real-life skills...

      Count on the Great Unwashed to do their dead level best to learn "complicated real-life skills" from entertainment media.

      [Me: Looks around at the random sample of humanity that just happens to be within eyesight right this minute]

      Yep. No doubt about it. None whatsoever.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    11. Re:Dreidel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because in the real world we get $200 every time we pass "GO."

      you don't get a paycheck?

    12. Re:Dreidel by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 1
      I guess we should take dreidels and dice away from all kids. So much for monopoly....

      People can gamble on practically everything, including the toss of a coin. Does it come down heads? Tails?

      I'm 70% certain that we can eliminate this gambling problem once and for all by banning currency in any and all forms. Anyone want to take me up on that bet?

      --
      You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
    13. Re:Dreidel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is must be how rich people get rich. They sure don't seem to be much smarter than the rest of us. They must know the secret stop that gives you $200 every time you pass it!

    14. Re:Dreidel by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. In no way, shape, or form does Monopoly teach kids "good money management".

      Monopoly teaches kids that "he who has the most 'toys', wins" - ie, consume, consume, consume. It teaches kids that if you buy more stuff, people give you more money.

      Either it's teaching gross consumerism, or setting kids up for behavior that, in the business world, results in anti-competitive monopolistic corporations

      that, or it's just a game. Though, you can't argue that at least -some- sort of pro-consumerist tendancies aren't picked up.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    15. Re:Dreidel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. If you win, I give you my TV. If I win, I get your car!

    16. Re:Dreidel by werfele · · Score: 2, Informative
      Monopoly teaches kids that "he who has the most 'toys', wins"
      That's almost it, but I think Monopoly teaches kids that those who accumulate great amounts of property will inevitably charge monopoly rents, unfairly driving up prices and sending others to the poorhouse. Driving home this point was the original intent of the game, and it's still pretty clear. The message is muddled because this casts the winner as the bad guy, which is counter-intuitive.

      But the contradiction might inspire thoughtful reflection, while gambling to provide sustenance for your pet would hopefully have no useful real world analogues.

    17. Re:Dreidel by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      You're right, although it should be noted that a lot of mormons will not play games with standard playing cards. (Hence the popularity of the "Rook" cards within mormon families.) However, there is no official church policy forbidding it, as far as I'm aware.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    18. Re:Dreidel by woofiegrrl · · Score: 1

      Actually, Neopets was originally designed for college students. It's oriented to young children NOW, but it used to be for big kids.

      --

      personal site: journal.amanita.net
      lesbian se
    19. Re:Dreidel by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      I'm 70% certain that we can eliminate this gambling problem once and for all by banning currency in any and all forms. Anyone want to take me up on that bet?

      Sure, but if you're wrong, you have to walk my dogs for a week.

      Oops, I guess you're wrong. :)

      Currency is only a concept for virtualizing barter of goods/services. It's value is purely supported by the belief of the parties exchanging it. Without it, things become more cumbersome, but nothing fundamental really changes.

    20. Re:Dreidel by GarryOwen · · Score: 1

      The not playing with face cards is actually a carry over from other religions back in 1800s, when the families converted they would carry with them alot of their minor beliefs and traditions such as the not playing with face cards. Since Mormon families tend to be close-knit, the traditions have carried down with alot of the younger generations just assuming its LDS doctrine.
      I did a lil bit of research on this to prove to my mother-in-law that face cards are ok.

    21. Re:Dreidel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is interesting. i don't think i have ever heard of that, can you enlighten me as to why they don't like face cards?

      i am not trying to ridicule anyone, i am just curious.

    22. Re:Dreidel by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      For the record, they don't die. They do complain on occasion, and other activities (Battledome dueling) require keeping them fed. That's about it, though.

    23. Re:Dreidel by justechn · · Score: 1

      I am Mormon and I have been all my life. My family favored "rook cards" but we also liked to play solitaire and other games that are better with face cards. I think the face cards controversy came from a book that was published along time ago by Bruce R. McKonkie called "Mormon Doctrine". Keep in mind that even though this man attained high position in the church this book was never accepted as official doctrine.

      ************

      CARD PLAYING

      See Apostasy, Gambling, Recreation. President Joseph F. Smith has stated the position of the Church with reference to card playing in these words: "Card playing is an excessive pleasure; it is intoxicating and, therefore, in the nature of a vice. It is generally the companion of the cigarette and the wine glass, and the latter lead to the poolroom and the gambling hall... Few indulge frequently in card playing in whose lives it does not become a ruling passion... A deck of cards in the hands of a faithful servant of God is a satire upon religion... Those who thus indulge are not fit to administer in sacred ordinances... The bishops are charged with the responsibility for the evil, and it is their duty to see that it is abolished... No man who is addicted to card playing shall be called to act as a ward teacher; such men cannot be consistent advocates of that which they do not themselves practice.

      "The card table has been the scene of too many quarrels, the birthplace of too many hatreds, the occasion of too many murders to admit one word of justification for the lying, cheating spirit which it too often engenders in the hearts of its devotees...

      "Card playing is a game of chance, and because it is a game of chance it has its tricks. It encourages tricks; its devotees measure their success at the table by their ability through devious and dark ways to win. It creates a spirit of cunning and devises hidden and secret means, and cheating at cards is almost synonymous with playing at cards." (Gospel Doctrine, 5th ed., pp. 328-332.)

      Members of the Church should not belong to bridge or other type of card clubs, and they should neither play cards nor have them in their homes. By cards is meant, of course, the spotted face cards used by gamblers. To the extent that church members play cards they are out of harmony with their inspired leaders. Innocent non-gambling games played with other types of cards, except for the waste of time in many instances, are not objectionable.

      ************

      So the key to this is not the cards themselves but the feelings, actions and attitudes that sometimes accompany the cards.

    24. Re:Dreidel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says? Monopoly only ever tought me the only way to get ahead is to own one of everything no matter the cost and trade till you win. =P

    25. Re:Dreidel by borovan · · Score: 1

      You serious? Damn Ive been playing it wrong all this time...

    26. Re:Dreidel by FredaReilly · · Score: 1

      Neopets is NOT aimed at kids - most of it is far too hard for them.

    27. Re:Dreidel by woofiegrrl · · Score: 1

      That implies that they think adults are going to be suckered by the McDonald's and 99dogs and Clickits and 13 Going On 30 and all the other advertising. Kids below the age of 8 or so don't have the sophistication to distinguish between an ad and content, but adults do.

      --

      personal site: journal.amanita.net
      lesbian se
    28. Re:Dreidel by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Monopoly (aka The Tenet (sp?) Game) was produced originally to show the amorality of renting tenets. Monopoly shows how to exploit others by buying lots of property and building houses/hotels on them. It shows how the real world works much more than it teaches good money management. Or have you not seen how people will go out of their way to buy up property then turn around and mortgage it for more property? It's things like this that made me realize that owning land is amoral. Making land non-transferable until death and after death auctioned to non-family with money going to the government and partially to the victim's family if murdered (excluding the murderer if they're part of the family, which seems probable) seems to be steps in the right direction.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    29. Re:Dreidel by mikefe · · Score: 1

      "Either it's teaching gross consumerism, or setting kids up for behavior that, in the business world, results in anti-competitive monopolistic corporations"

      Well, look at what it did for Billy Gates -- he was a master at monopoly.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    30. Re:Dreidel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christmas bonus?

  4. Historical precedents by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The idea is that you play punting games to keep your Neopet fed and healthy. If you don't gamble, or worse, lose on the punt, your Neopet starves or is sent off to an orphanage."

    Karl Marx and Charles Dickens wrote about that before MacDonalds worked it out.

  5. Similar by StevenHenderson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Parents not McHappy over pokie toy

    Funny...whenever I show children my "pokie" toy, the parents aren't too thrilled either...

    1. Re:Similar by Minwee · · Score: 1

      And just imagine how upset they were to discover that it came in their child's Happy Meal.

    2. Re:Similar by StevenHenderson · · Score: 2, Funny
      it came in their child's Happy Meal

      If they give me enough time, I can come in anything... :)

    3. Re:Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although, with "Women", it is just a theoretical possiblity.

    4. Re:Similar by julesh · · Score: 1

      Yeuch! I don't think I'm ever going to eat fast-food mayonnaise again.

    5. Re:Similar by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      Women? Who? Oh you mean, those ladies that pose for me on the internet...ahhh....

    6. Re:Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone call the paramedics for me .. I can't breathe, laughing at work ... must ... keep .... quiet .......

  6. elementary school teacher agrees by bcreane · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Neopets is insidious because it provides "challenges" that appear to require students' problem-solving abilities. Its more like video-game crack since it combines elements that fascinate both girls and boys, youngters and adults: community-building chats, personal vendettas (you can slam an opponent by name) as well as the usual eye-candy. My students (grades 4/5, "inner-city" youth) will go to neopets given the smallest opportunity. Fortunately I've just gotten our squid-server going ... say "bye-bye! Neopets!"

    1. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, lets get them off that dangerous internet, and into the extracurricular programs... oh wait, those got cancelled for budget reasons... ok, then, out into the gang filled "inner-city" streets where they belong!

    2. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Kaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Neopets is insidious because it provides "challenges" that appear to require students' problem-solving abilities. Its more like video-game crack since it combines elements that fascinate both girls and boys, youngters and adults: community-building chats, personal vendettas (you can slam an opponent by name) as well as the usual eye-candy.

      Seems to me that you are complaining that Neopets is a well-designed, attactive game with cross-gender and cross-age appeal. That is bad?

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    3. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neopets is insidious because it provides "challenges" that appear to require students' problem-solving abilities. Its more like video-game crack since it combines elements that fascinate both girls and boys, youngters and adults: community-building chats, personal vendettas (you can slam an opponent by name) as well as the usual eye-candy.

      And this is bad because...?

    4. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by bcreane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      your're right, I am complaining about a well-designed game. i forgot to mention that we're preparing (high-horse alert!) students for life through a process of "education" ... math, literacy, science, etc. Neopets has a different mission: profit. The students' interest is sadly neglected by the makers of neopets. Okay, off the high horse.

    5. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Kaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i forgot to mention that we're preparing (high-horse alert!) students for life through a process of "education" ... math, literacy, science, etc. Neopets has a different mission: profit. The students' interest is sadly neglected by the makers of neopets.

      High horses aside, I am not sure what is the point that you are making. Are you trying to say that all non-educational games are bad? Are you saying that companies with a profit motive should not exist? Or should not be allowed to make good games, only bad ones?

      Obviously, Neopets (the company) is not a school. So? A great many things in life are not schools either.

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    6. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Tassach · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I forgot to mention that we're preparing (high-horse alert!) students for life through a process of "education"
      So the problem isn't the game itself, but rather the fact that your students lack the self-discipline to do what they have to do instead of what the want to do.

      I can see how it's all the game's fault that the parents and teachers have failed to develop the kids self-discipline and time management skills. News flash: learning how to deal with distractions and prioritize activities is an essential part of the educational process.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    7. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by bcreane · · Score: 1

      You have an excellent point. The fact is that many 8, 9 and 10 years in my school (poverty-driven families of color) seem to have a fondness for video games. Another fact is that companies are creating games that are meant to be so enjoyable that they verge on addictive for many of these students. And finally it seems to me that companies such as neopets care little for the well-being of their "customers" since their real customers are the ones paying for the games. So I've arrived at the viewpoint that companies are like non-lethal viruses ... they disable their hosts without killing them.

    8. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO...the poster it seems to me is saying that NeoPets compete for time during the school day. That is a bad thing, fortunately it sounds like it will be remedied soon ;-)

    9. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Good luck conversing with the Slashdot crowd about this. "Everything is the fault of the individual, so there's no need for us to get involved at any level other than telling the individual to shape up." is the way things go here in Libertarianville. Those who think that minors might not have the decision-making abilities of adults and may need guidance, or that school systems should make any effort at all to compensate for deficiencies in parenting, are generally not well regarded.

      Not to worry, Slashdotters have about as small of an effect on the real world as the real world has on them.

    10. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah it's really a shame that they're all about profits.

      Can you imagine the potential learning experience Neopets could offer if they had logic and math games or taught simple economics with in-game stores and a stock market or encouraged reading and pattern-matching skills by offering challenges that emphasized them?
      </sarcasm>

      Teachers who combine material with topics that interest their students are usually more successful than those who don't. The problem is finding something that has broad appeal and, IMHO, Neopets fits that criteria nicely.

      Of course, Neopets is probably not going to produce any scholastic material or teachers' aids so it'll only ever be used by teachers that care.

    11. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by realdpk · · Score: 1

      "Those who think that minors might not have the decision-making abilities of adults and may need guidance, or that school systems should make any effort at all to compensate for deficiencies in parenting, are generally not well regarded."

      I thought that was why kids have parents, to help guide their decisions? Everything is the fault of the individual is correct. For kids and adults. But in kids sake, the adults (or guardians) are the ones who should "fix" (or help fix) what goes wrong. If these parents aren't doing the job, perhaps they shouldn't have had kids in the first place, and perhaps they should give them to someone who can do the job. Sadly, however, these parents are probably the same ones who had the kids just to feel needed/important.

    12. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's go into the "ethics" that Neopets teaches shall we? (Asside: I was a volunteer monitor a couple years ago because my then-11 daughter was crazy for the site.) The lessons they taught were it's ok to spam (they had a "local" definition of spam that none of us would recognize.), to try and cheat people out of their accounts (account scamming was rampant) and "earnings" (fraud was rampant - at least within the limited context of their game), and a host of other dubious lessons. Let's add the fact that the whole concept is a blatant rip off of Pokemon (gag) and their marketing tie ins make it patently obvious that this is a money making site for the staff first, and a fun site for kids about fifth.

      I could go on, but you get the drift. They had a chance to do something really cool for kids. Instead they chose to go for the money, and forget the ethics.

      It's good to see a teacher doing something to help the kids focus on lessons that are valuable, rather than those that will lead to another generation of "Ethically challenged" netizens.

    13. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by kLaNk · · Score: 1

      Wow, bitter person decries slashdot via anonymous post.

      Seriously, what balls!

      I believe the response to your assertions would be that yes, immature people (notice I don't mention the age) need guidance, with children and minors this should come from the parents the majority of the time. And yes, the school system shouldn't compensate for deficiencies in parenting. There are other ways to tackle the bad parenting problem and I personally don't feel the school system is the way to do it. Of course this is an entirely different thread, one which we probably won't have due to your spineless posting tactics.

      And yes, if you want to distill this argument down into simple game of party association, I consider myself more of a moderate libertarian (my own words) than anything else. Maybe that is enough to dismiss my opinions in your mind?

    14. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Its more like video-game crack since it combines elements that fascinate both girls and boys, youngters and adults: community-building chats, personal vendettas (you can slam an opponent by name) as well as the usual eye-candy.

      Sounds a lot like a high school football match. Plenty of chatting, lots of cheerleader eye-candy, and personal vendettas galore, with more than just words being used to slam opponents. Lots of "challenges" against their problem-solving abilities, too, as they develop new plays, etc.

      Do you plan to ban the kids from that, too?

      Just because these kids enjoy it a lot right now doesn't mean they'll be at it forever. However, if there's one surefire way to prolong how long they'll play this game (and, subsequently, annoy you trying to subvert your rules), it's to ban it from them without banning them from going outside your eyesight.

      Remember that thing "X" that you really wanted as a child, but weren't given, and now are buying/playing/doing since your parents aren't able to tell you what to do anymore?

      Yeah.

      Nothing teaches someone to learn to abstain than just making sure they can't have it in the first place. Yeah, that was me being sarcastic.

      I suppose what I'm saying is, you might want to talk this idea over with the school's counsellor and ask him how effective your ban will be at acheiving your anti-neopets' goal, and whether it is going to improve or worsen your student's abilities. There's a lot to be said for lettting problems sort themselves out.

      All that aside, I had a hell of a lot more learning experience in high school trying to network together the old junk PCs with arcnet cards and attempting to get them to play network Doom and run an intranet based BBS than I had in the Physics class we took 15 pages of notes in per day (failed that one TWICE -- got it right in summer school -- we didn't do notes there, just book study). Thank God that first teacher realized how valuable it was to mix fun with learning -- oddly enough, it wasn't even his business to let us do that (he taught electrical class). That teacher took time out of his day for extracurricular activities that those of us not into sports would enjoy learning from.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    15. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how expressing an opinion on Slashdot could possibly be ballsy, anonymous or not. Slashdot is where you gripe about stuff, occasionally become deluded with the idea someone is listening, but ultimately are ignored. Doing it anonymously is really just redundant, that's all. I've been posting for years to Slashdot and have never created an account. You know what? I'm not missing anything.

      Yay for you, for comprehending that children need guidance. Boo for you for thinking that if children don't receive this guidance from their parents, they're just not going to get guidance, and we'll just toss 'em in jail when they become the inevitable sociopath.

      Yes, being libertarian is enough reason for most people to ignore your opinion, including me. Not that having your opinions disregarded on Slashdot is anything new. Being libertarian, like posting anonymously, is redundant on Slashdot.

    16. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by kLaNk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, bitter person decries slashdot via anonymous post.

      Seriously, what balls!

      I don't see how expressing an opinion on Slashdot could possibly be ballsy, anonymous or not. Slashdot is where you gripe about stuff, occasionally become deluded with the idea someone is listening, but ultimately are ignored. Doing it anonymously is really just redundant, that's all. I've been posting for years to Slashdot and have never created an account. You know what? I'm not missing anything.

      You have obviously missed my sarcastic humour (FYI, I used it again at the beginning of this post since it fit so well). I apologize. I normally dislike tags and thus avoid using them. I shall take your misunderstanding as a data point and change my personal views to better interact with other slashdot members.

      But, you have admitted to never having a slashdot account. How would you know if you aren't missing anything? I'm not saying that posting AC isn't your thing (cool if it is), but please make informed statements.

      Personally, the main reason that I frequent slashdot, is for the humor. If you look at my posts you will realize that makes up the majority of my participation. I never was a huge advocate pushing the importance of slashdot and the conversations which take place here. You came up with that one on your own buddy.

      Yay for you, for comprehending that children need guidance. Boo for you for thinking that if children don't receive this guidance from their parents, they're just not going to get guidance, and we'll just toss 'em in jail when they become the inevitable sociopath.

      Wow, allow me to quote myself (and how I love to do that):

      There are other ways to tackle the bad parenting problem and I personally don't feel the school system is the way to do it.

      How in the world did you take that statement to mean we should ignore the children until they all become sociopaths and then put them in jail? Once again, you came up with that one all on your own buddy, I had nothing to do with it (although I am really curious how you made the jump).

    17. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by FredaReilly · · Score: 1

      So teaching children science is good, but teaching them about profit, ie making a living is bad? What planet are you on? Ah yes, planet "school" rather than the real world that the rest of us inhabit. :-)

    18. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, you sarcastically claimed posting anonymously was ballsy (meaning that it was not, har har). I responded by stating that ALL Slashdot postings are cowardly, anonymous ones no moreso than others. It seems I understood your humour, but you failed to understand my serious point. I'll take that as a data point and try to be less direct when communicating with you in the future. Clearly while you are a master at sarcasm, direct statements of fact befuddle you.

      Some Slashdot users have accounts. Some Slashdot users have friends with accounts. I won't explain to you exactly how this works, what with overlapping groups and Venn diagrams and all, but it suffices to say that there IS a way to assess the value of a Slashdot account without actually having one. I'll leave the detective work to you.

      And, lastly, the "last refuge of the Libertarian" response. It's pretty common, when a Libertarian criticizes the government doing some sort of activity, for them to say "there's plenty of other ways to handle this" or "if the government just stepped back, some original thinkers would step up and solve the problem". The Libertarian rarely actually offers a solution, just a "Step 2. A private sector miracle happens" leap of faith. It never occurs to him that original thinkers may have solved the problem long ago, by coming up with government. Please forgive me for lumping you in with those other Libertarians for whom "doing nothing" is truly the only alternative they can offer. Actually, I was giving those "do nothing" Libertarians the benefit of the doubt by assuming they'd put sociopaths in jail. Perhaps that's too "big government" for them and we should let the market sort the sociopath issue out. I'm sure you had good reasons to conceal the better options.

    19. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by kLaNk · · Score: 1

      Allow me to again quote your original statement:

      I don't see how expressing an opinion on Slashdot could possibly be ballsy, anonymous or not. Slashdot is where you gripe about stuff, occasionally become deluded with the idea someone is listening, but ultimately are ignored. Doing it anonymously is really just redundant, that's all. I've been posting for years to Slashdot and have never created an account. You know what? I'm not missing anything.

      That was your original statement. In it you mention posting anonymously as being "redundant." dictionary.com gives a definition as: "Exceeding what is necessary or natural; superfluous". I assume that you were talking about the cowardly nature of the posts when you made this comment. Thus, you yourself admitted that posting anonymously was more cowardly than posting non-AC (otherwise it wouldn't be redundant). Well, that is what you said in your original statement anyway. Now this is what you are saying:

      I responded by stating that ALL Slashdot postings are cowardly, anonymous ones no moreso than others.

      But you said anonymous ones were redundant? I won't argue with the ALL Slashdot postings are cowardly statement. I agree with you. But you appear to have changed your tune with the "anonymous ones no moreso than others" part. If this is indeed your true feelings I will suggest you are close, but not quite right. With Karma, while busted surely, there is the potential for a slight ramification if you were to post flames all day long. One could argue that it isn't strong enough (I would) but it is method of accountability and that is more than posting AC has.

      You in fact are missing out on things by not having a slashdot membership. You personally might not value them or desire to use them (which is fine) but to make a statement that you are missing out on nothing is patently wrong. Can you have a journal? Can you moderate? No, those are things that you are missing out on. Whether you care about such things is up to you of course, I don't really care whether you value them or not (obviously you don't).

      And finally about the school thing, never did I say government shouldn't do something. I think government should do something and I also feel that that something shouldn't happen via the school systems (at least not our current systems). I believe that the problem of bad parenting should be fixed rather than covered up by the schools performing the job for the parents. Personally I would like to see government offered "seed" money in order to grow local grassroots social organizations to facilitate parental learning so as to work to eliminate the problem as much as possible. With the ultimate goal being to reduce the dependency of these groups on the government (here is where the libertarian part of me comes through).

    20. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by bcreane · · Score: 1

      you must be skimming the conversation and not following the actual gist. Teaching about profit is great -- we have local business leaders come into our elementary school each year and do age-appropriate lessons set up the better business bureau. Making profit off of children at their expense is not good. The difference seems clear to me.

    21. Re:elementary school teacher agrees by DarkZero · · Score: 1

      Those who think that minors might not have the decision-making abilities of adults and may need guidance, or that school systems should make any effort at all to compensate for deficiencies in parenting, are generally not well regarded.

      I think the real point that most /.ers are trying to make is that automatic systems should not be used to keep children from misbehaving. When most of us were growing up (and for many of us, this was not long ago at all), there wasn't an automatic system that physically kept us from screwing around during class. We had a teacher who was there to teach us that we shouldn't (rather than can't) screw around, and eventually most of us realized that even though we wanted to play with our Gameboys or trading cards or whatever else in class, we would get in trouble for it, and our homework would take a Hell of a lot longer without instruction.

      Nowadays, when all kids want to do is visit gaming websites and that action can just be stopped with a proxy, that lesson isn't taught. The kids don't learn the lesson of "I want to, but I shouldn't", they're just taught "I want to, but I physically can't", which is not a lesson which will serve them in adulthood. In the real world, you almost always CAN do the wrong thing, and it's very rare that anything physically stops you.

  7. Adver-gaming by Paladin144 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've heard about this site before (I work in PR), but in the context of how advertisers are trying to hook kids on their brands at a very young age. The logic goes that kids develop life-long brand associations, so the advertisers exploit that with these "free" games. Of course, you have to register, and the advertisers get a chance to get their hooks in you. I don't really consider online registration ever to be "free." It costs you something in terms of time, effort and privacy. That's fine for me - and most of us here - we know this stuff. But what about the kids who think they're getting something for nothing?

    1. Re:Adver-gaming by erick99 · · Score: 1

      That is why my kids are not allowed to register for anything online without my permission. They don't generally treat registration as innocuous and they trust the sites implicitly. Dad doesn't.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    2. Re:Adver-gaming by erick99 · · Score: 1

      Correction: They DO generally treat registration as innocuous....

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    3. Re:Adver-gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These are free games. Register using the name Karl Marx and you're set to go. You don't get email, phone calls, snail mail, anything, ever. There is more advertising on slashdot than there is on Neopets. I'd rather play a McDonald's game that gives me Neopoints (karma?) than stare at a HOT JOBS YAHOO banner.

      What is it you suggest they're getting hooked on? There is no ad saturation. all but a few of the hundreds of games and activities are sponsored by McDonald's or a new music single. Almost all of the embedded ads (about 100x45 pixels) are for games. It's not an ad if it says, 'Play Meerca Chase now!' There is no commercial hook whatsoever. I don't understand.

      I have gotten LOTS for nothing, and so has my daughter and a couple of her friends and a couple of mine. We've gotten 3 years of fantastic spare time entertainment.

      I have no urge to go to McDonald's. I haven't been in one in years, except to use the restroom.

    4. Re:Adver-gaming by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      As someone in advertising/marketing I looked at this game from a similar perspective. Then I remembered that there were free branded games out there that I enjoyed playing in highschool such as the ones at Candystand. These don't require any registration, and they still get the branded message across.

      But the question really is about where you draw the line. As an industry professional, I can recognize the value of this, but at the same time would never want to subject children to it. Of course, I'm a personal believer that the branding through these games really has a minimal effect. And while I'm not entirely sure how many ad dollars they get for it, I know I would never consider suggesting this to a client because I don't think it would be effective at all.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:Adver-gaming by thatnerdguy · · Score: 0

      the advertising comes not necessarily from ads, of which there isn't many, but from branded games and entire sections of the site. Yet they do not attempt to hide these: at the bottom of this page, it clearly states "THIS PAGE CONTAINS PAID ADVERTISEMENTS". My girlfriend, who's been playing for years spends a lot of time there, but I don't think it's a bad thing. It's something to do, she's working towards a goal in the game and she's meeting new people.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    6. Re:Adver-gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neopets is affiliated with - surprise - the Church of Scientology. They are the kings of advertising B.S.

  8. Today Tonight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why be the last to know?

  9. Why not make it educational? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Video poker systems that take real live money to play will clean you out. These fake ones that they have to feed your virtua-pet obviously are set up with easier payouts.
    Simply make the neoPets gambling area obey the odds of real gambling!
    Little Sally won't end up with a gambling addiction -- her neoPet will simply die of starvation because she lost all her cash at the poker table. Now THAT's the kind of lesson that sticks with ya!

    --
    free gmail invites! join the club.

    1. Re:Why not make it educational? by bcreane · · Score: 1

      Its a great idea to make neopets gambling as risky as real gambling, that way we'll control children's neopet gambling as well as our society handles adult money gambling. Oh wait, never mind.

    2. Re:Why not make it educational? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neopets do not die. While your pet will become hungry quickly, even if it is listed as 'dying', it can remain in that state forever. I haven't fed my Neopets in several weeks. :)

      While you can play games which are usually found in Casinos, (Slots, 21, Poker, Craps, and several other card games) the odds of winning these games are very low, I'd say they're even lower than in the real life versions of the games. I've played both and I've had more luck in real casinos than on Neopets. - Besides most of the currency on Neopets is made by "restocking" items. You see, the land of Neopia is populated with many stores, run by players and the sysops themselves. If you buy from the sysop stores before anyone else can and sell those items for a markup, you'll make mucho moolah.

      Also, if you lose or spend all your money, you can get food free from several locations on the site and also from the, Soup Faerie.

      My girlfriend and I have been playing Neopets for about two years. We only play when we're bored at work, so we don't have much wealth. I think Neopets is a great casual game, but they really gear the site toward hardcore players and newbies, there's no middle ground. So most children will pick this up and think it's great before they realize how much time and work they have to invest to have any of the cool or rare things in the game. Like Everquest, this game is mainly work, not fun. So my girlfriend and I tossed all the not fun stuff and stick to what we enjoy. She plays Solitare on Neopets, I play Scorchy Slots, that's about all we do aside from get the free daily items and such. :)

      As far as sponsored games go. Most of them are horrid and aren't played that often. So when a kid looks at a sponsored game on this site that won't reward them with much money, they'll turn their nose up at it and most likely not have a positive image of the product in the future, perhaps thinking their cheapskates?

  10. Gambling alternatives by Mikail · · Score: 3, Funny

    Geez, if parents are that pissed off about gambling, it's a good thing Neopets didn't go with players being able to pimp out their pets to make some extra cash...

    --
    If life is a waste of time and time is a waste of life, let's all get wasted and have the time of our lives.
    1. Re:Gambling alternatives by chill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Geez, if parents are that pissed off about gambling, it's a good thing Neopets didn't go with players being able to pimp out their pets to make some extra cash...

      Sounds like Neopets meets Sims Online.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  11. Parenting and online games by beavis88 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...so when a mother discovered her nine-year-old playing online poker...

    Perhaps said parent should have been supervising their child's internet usage? You know, there are only about five hundred million worse things an unsupervised child could be doing on the internet. This mother should be happy it was just neopets. Perhaps she'll learn a lesson here, but my [cynical] guess is that she'll just continue to blame other people/companies for her lack of parenting skills.

    1. Re:Parenting and online games by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps she'll learn a lesson here, but my [cynical] guess is that she'll just continue to blame other people/companies for her lack of parenting skills.

      Ever think she did find her child "gambling" online because she was doing her job as a parent?

      I don't agree with regulations due to bad parenting but this one might actually seem like an active parent discovering what their child did because they were paying attenion not because they heard a Dateline (or similiar program down under) story about it and decided to be vocal.

    2. Re:Parenting and online games by drlake · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm guessing you have no children? Neither do I, but I'm quite aware that it is impossible to monitor a 9 year old all the time. This wouldn't be a problem in the first place if they weren't targeting kids in this way.

    3. Re:Parenting and online games by cttforsale · · Score: 1

      Let the molitovs fly and cunnilingus perpetuate in plain view in the streets. As long as the parents are with their kids, they'll be safe. The pendulum contiunes to swing...

    4. Re:Parenting and online games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was supervising her child's usage you nitwit. How do you think she found out about it??

      Whoever moderated the parent as "insightful" should be shot.

    5. Re:Parenting and online games by DanteBlack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed!

      Parents used to take an active role in their childrens lives. I know for me that my mother and father palyed with me, read to me, and involved me in adult conversation on a regular basis, as young a four years old. There was constant involvment in my life and how it would evolve. I learned morals, how to make decisions, right and wrong, and deal with the consiqueces.

      Society today, IMO, has sissified our children and parents are at the root of the problem. Children don't particulary have worries. That's not nessecarily a bad thing, they're children. The problem is that parents have started pawning them off on gaming and tv and then complain, or sue, when it's not a good enough babysitter. Get involved!

      Moreover, societaly we've gone to great lengths to 'protect' our children. From everything. Children don't experience things. Adversity, injury, pain, loss, disiplin, mistakes, and other such unpleasentries build character and teach us things. They teach us things that are just as important as what we get from love, victory, accomplishment, a pretty sunset, and what have you. Together these make up things that we 'need to khow' later in life. If children aren't allowed to 'learn' these lessons how are they to deal with the sittuations that require the expeirence and wisdom they would have developed.

      Get back in touch with your children and if you can't do that... suck it up and accept that your child is becoming and illinformed, underdeveloped, nassy.

      Blah...

      --
      I am invisble, and you can't see me.
    6. Re:Parenting and online games by ductormalef · · Score: 1

      ...so when a mother discovered her nine-year-old playing online poker...

      It sounds like she was supervising. I don't know if you have any kids, but it is impossible (and counter-productive to their development) to monitor their every move. I would guess that the parent probably relies on some sort of content filtering software to help (note I didn't say guarantee) her kids from being exposed to the nastier parts of the internet, and I'm guessing that ACME Parental Controls doesn't have the neopets site on its blacklist...yet.

      At least she was paying attention enough to catch it, and (since it is a behavior she obviously disagrees with) take corrective action. You don't have to see and control everything your kid does to be a good parent. The occasional skinned knee teaches a lesson better than a parent ever could. Of course, we could probably start a whole new topic about over/under-parenting pros and cons :)

      --
      The Fat Man Walks Alone
    7. Re:Parenting and online games by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      You should stop spouting cliched homilies and engage your brain for a couple of seconds. The parent probably was monitoring their child. One minute she looks over and little Timmie is playing tic-tac-toe. The next minute she looks over and little Timmie is drawing to an inside straight...

      While I think it is stupid for this mom to be complaining about the evils of gambling, it's going a bit beyond silly to suggest that she wasn't supervising her child properly. Do you want her to put a leash on the kid? Sit in his lap? Lock him in a closet until he's eighteen?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:Parenting and online games by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Because she discovered her child playing neopets, it seems to me like she was monitoring the child's internet usage.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    9. Re:Parenting and online games by toby · · Score: 1
      this one might actually seem like an active parent discovering what their child did because they were paying attenion not because they heard a Dateline (or similiar program down under) story
      Yes. And best of all, she actually did something about it: approached the current affairs journalists and got the story aired. That might help thousands of less observant parents.

      --
      you had me at #!
    10. Re:Parenting and online games by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Well, but you can keep your computers password (if you are always online) or the internet providers password away from them without ANY problem. And until they have reached at least 2 digit ages, this would be very advisabe (because the internet is NO childrens playground)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    11. Re:Parenting and online games by drlake · · Score: 1

      That's unnecessarily restrictive parenting. It should be possible for parents to allow their children to use the home computer and even be online without watching them every second by that age. The fundamental point is that these pets are marketed to kids, and then promote gambling. Not a good combo, and it should not be up to the parents to control such ridiculous marketing.

    12. Re:Parenting and online games by ronaldb64 · · Score: 1
      The next minute she looks over and little Timmie is drawing to an inside straight...
      And she rightly took corrective action! What was Timmie thinking, drawing on an inside straight??
      --
      There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    13. Re:Parenting and online games by ErinTippin · · Score: 1

      Reread the last line of that article. "You think you're doing the best you can and supervising everything, but some things still slip through and my son has been playing this for months." Months!!! She sure was "surpervising everything" wasn't she? If she doesn't want her kid exposed to Neopets, fine. That's her decision. But she doesn't have the right to make that decision for MY kid or yours. I suppose every kid who ever played with a toy gun went out and shot up the neighborhood when he grew up? No. And I sincerely doubt that every kid who plays games on Neopets is going to grow up to be a gambling addict either. Sheesh! Her kid is probably going to have more problems being named after a motorcycle than he's going to have being exposed to Neopets!

    14. Re:Parenting and online games by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, it's like she would be a good parent to find her kid after he had shot the homeless guy? And the answer isn't to blame the kid or herself for not being active *sooner*. It's to pat herself on the back and blame the gun owner or the government for leaving homeless people in the streets. No, no parent can be everywhere all the time. But, a good parent will teach a child what is good/bad so they can leave the child alone for short bursts.

      It's why children should learn about sex as early as possible, so they can protect themselves. It's why they need to learn about gambling as early as possible, so they can protect themselves. Waiting until a kid is 13 or 18 to start teaching them the birds and bees or that you should never call if you think your opponent has a flush (unless you have a royal flush, obviously), is waiting way too late. Parents trying to keep their children naive/innocent or being unable to talk about things because of their own emotional problems *hurts* the child. Not only that, but the side effect of keeping an ever-present eye on their children because their children are too ignorant to know better just makes the child resentful especially in teenage years.

      So, good for the parent for final catching on to what their child was doing. It's about fucking time.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    15. Re:Parenting and online games by Tyreth · · Score: 1
      So, it's like she would be a good parent to find her kid after he had shot the homeless guy? And the answer isn't to blame the kid or herself for not being active *sooner*. It's to pat herself on the back and blame the gun owner or the government for leaving homeless people in the streets.

      It's nothing like this. It's more like the parent finding the child talking to people encouraging the murder of homeless people, or reading a document on the needs to eliminate homeless people violently.

      The parent was worried that the child might develop a real, genuine gambling habit - not that the child was actually gambling.

    16. Re:Parenting and online games by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      A closer analogy would be finding the child after killing a puppy but before killing a homeless person. The kid was still gambling. They just weren't gambling with money. The worry is this quasi-gambling will turn into real gambling, like killing animals might lead to being a serial killer. The point is, in either case the parent should have already told the kid about gambling (as well as not killing puppies).

      You can't ban the world of people encouraging the murder of homeless people or documents on why such is a good idea. Why? Because you can't destroy ideas. You can only suppress them (any idea "destroyed" will be recreated eventually). It's the job of parents to teach their kids why going along with such ideas is bad for them and others. There's no quick fixes. There's no one to blame but the parents.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    17. Re:Parenting and online games by Tyreth · · Score: 1
      I don't believe that is a closer example. In this case the child hasn't risked anything real, and is only simulating the experience of gambling. Dare I say, similar to murdering in a computer game.

      Killing an animal for the fun of it may be an indicator of future trends, since it involves doing something real and permanent. Doing it in a computer game is entirely different.

      There are many things in life which involve 'gambling' - taking risks with a chance of loss. Sometimes simulated. Ever board game, including monopoly, includes a gamble whenever you roll the dice. Playing a simulation of gambling is more of an introduction to a topic than a beginning of future trends. I simply don't believe the parent acted too late in this case - that is completely unreasonable and unfair. They DID find out what their child was doing BEFORE it was too late. It's not like it had done the gambling equivalent of killing an animal (equivalent being gambling lunches at school or something).

  12. At least by Locdonan · · Score: 1

    They will stop selling their Pikachu to lonely old men and getting high on Card dust from M:TG booster packs.

    --
    If I wrote something witty, you would say I stole it from somewhere.
  13. There is nothing wrong with Neopets. by PotatoHead · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got hooked on this for a while, playing with my daughters. We had a neopoint contest and it was good fun.

    That site is pretty educational as far as I am concerned. Sure there is gambling, but there are plenty of other things too.

    You can play games of skill to get your points and avoid the gambling ones.

    The educational part for my family came after I won the Neopoint contest. (It was first to get 250,000) My kids lost because they did not understand how the whole Neopia thing worked.

    Things we talked about:

    Investments: How the bank was different from the stock market. What is compound interest and how does it benefit you. Keeping your money liquid vs tied up in investments and how that affects your ability to build wealth.

    Marketing, buying and selling: Setting up a shop. How to make your shop stand out, what are people buying, how to take advantage of trends in the marketplace. Ripping people off and getting ripped off.

    Gambling: Scratch cards, games of chance, how investments are similar to gambling and how they are different.

    As far as I am concerned, Neopets is one of the very best sites on the net for parents to talk to their kids about money matters.

    Highly Recommended, IMHO.

    1. Re:There is nothing wrong with Neopets. by VE3ECM · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The real issue here is that you're (from the sounds of it) one of those 1 in 5 parents that actually takes an active roll in educating their children.

      Sadly, too many parents are too busy with their own lives to spend the appropriate amount of time necessary to teach their children. They expect the schools to do it all for them.

      Sadly, because things have come to parents using TV, video games or the internet to babysit their children, this is going to come up more and more.

      Your children are very lucky. Most will never receive the kind of parenting you purport to provide.

    2. Re:There is nothing wrong with Neopets. by VE3ECM · · Score: 1

      Dammit. I meant 'role', not 'roll'. What's bread got ta do, got ta do with it?

    3. Re:There is nothing wrong with Neopets. by OverlordQ · · Score: 0

      First EverCrack, what's next NeoCrack?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:There is nothing wrong with Neopets. by jangobongo · · Score: 1

      I also played Neopets with my kids. We have two computers side-by-side, both hooked up to the internet, and the kids can only "surf" and play Neopets on one computer while I am supervising them while sitting at the other computer. Then I can keep an eye on what they are doing, answer their questions, help them if they need it, and guide them.

      I have to say that I ended up being the biggest Neo-addict. To be able to anything on their site, you need to earn thousands of neopoints and the most desirable items for psuedo-purchase cost 200,000 neopoints or more usually. My kids lost interest quickly because games give out paltry points and the "games of chance" (read: gambling) aren't very rewarding.

      I think that this would be a perfect way to let kids learn that "games of chance" don't pay off. It's better for them to learn it now, with non-existent money (the neopoints) than later with real money.

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    5. Re:There is nothing wrong with Neopets. by IronChef · · Score: 2, Funny

      The educational part for my family came after I won the Neopoint contest. (It was first to get 250,000) My kids lost because they did not understand how the whole Neopia thing worked.

      YES! HAHA! How do you like them apples, babies? Faced!

      Hmm, I guess this is why I don't have kids. :)

  14. Dragons? by james_orr · · Score: 3, Funny

    "There's many, many different species and they're all based on real things, like a Lupe is a dog, a Scorchio is a dragon," Jacqui said.

    .... dragons are real????
    1. Re:Dragons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they are, but probably not the ones you're imagining. Google for "bearded dragon" or "komodo dragon".

    2. Re:Dragons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ' "There's many, many different species and they're all based on real things, like a Lupe is a dog, a Scorchio is a dragon," Jacqui said. .... dragons are real????'

      Dude, haven't you heard?

      A Nony Mouse

    3. Re:Dragons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they are, you never read McCafferey?

      Dunbal

    4. Re:Dragons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you're Ann O'Nymous.

    5. Re:Dragons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insert obligatory mother-in-law references here

  15. Wow... by wschalle · · Score: 1

    Dumbest protest ever...

  16. I bet you by kevinx · · Score: 1

    5 bucks says pokee dies within the week.

    1. Re:I bet you by tasinet · · Score: 1

      5 mil says it dont.

  17. OMG I'm turning my kids into gambling adicts! by 'nother+poster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, they don't play the Neopets games, but I do play poker, blackjack, gin (and other rummy games), pinnochle, and eucher with my kids. I guess I should expect DFS to show up and haul me away. ;)

    Playing games, even games of chance, does not lead to gambling addiction. Being dumb as a rock, and thinking that you can win when the games are legally stacked aginst you, that can lead to gambling addiction.

    1. Re:OMG I'm turning my kids into gambling adicts! by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      I'm an only child, but I would visit my extended family fairly often. All my cousins from about 7 on up are able to play poker, 45's, 31 (we call it Scat), Blackjack, Golf, Royal Solitaire, Egyptian, and of course things like Go Fish.

      I remember hearing a story about when my uncles were playing with their job money once (back in the 60's) and one of them lost everything in a poker game. The kid (my uncle) was pretty upset, and grammy wanted to refund the money, but grandpa wouldn't hear it. He let it be a lesson to him, and you know what? Right now that uncle is one of the best money managers and card players that I know. He learned a hard lesson in losing a week's paycheck, but he LEARNED.

      Similar things have happened from time to time with the rest of the family, but it's a life lesson. And while there's been other kinds of problems with various family members, I've never heard of ANY them having a gambling problem because they've all been there and/or seen it.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    2. Re:OMG I'm turning my kids into gambling adicts! by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

      I think your attitude is admirable in that you are educating your children and guiding their exposure to games.

      It's your second paragraph that I have problems with:

      - Odds aren't stacked against you when you play poker, even many video poker machines offer odds in the customer's favor if they are played perfectly.

      - Addiction, gambling or otherwise, doesn't only happen to the stupid. Very intelligent people (who know the odds!) can be vulnerable to gambling addiction - and your kids will be less vulnerable to it if an awareness of this fact is part of the education about games of chance that you are providing.

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
    3. Re:OMG I'm turning my kids into gambling adicts! by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      OK. Odds aren't stacked aginst you when you play table poker, but the house does take a cut of the table, so that when the winners and losers walk away, the total funds are less than when they sat down. The other games do have a legally recognized house advantage.

      As to the second point, being intelligent in one area does not make you intelligent in all areas. I was specificaly addressing people who, knowing that the odds are aginst them, still believe that they are somehow special, and can beat the odds. That type of reality disconnect is what I was trying to convey.

    4. Re:OMG I'm turning my kids into gambling adicts! by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but do you play them for their pocket money? I think there is a slight difference. The problem with this form of gambling, is that there is some reward given, so people begin to associate playing these games with being rewarded. A simple pavlovian response. If you can't see this as being dangerous, then you are being a little naive.

    5. Re:OMG I'm turning my kids into gambling adicts! by wolf1541 · · Score: 1

      I bet you I don't have a gambling problem.

  18. Freaking hilarious by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 0

    It's a freaking plastic toy that beeps when it's "hungry". Holy COW! Talk about an overreaction. When little johnny's shooting craps for real money, that's gambling. If it's not real money, it's just a video game like the countless zillions of other ones that contain "fake" money (should we ban Need for Speed Underground too? It sets kids up for a lifetime of spending money frivolously on cars and street racing! waaah!)

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Freaking hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what is the state of pinball machines in AUS, or do they have the "free game" features and "credit match" turned off?

    2. Re:Freaking hilarious by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You obviously didn't RTFA. Neopets is a vast online gaming / chat / community area. The toys are just marketing crap to attract them to that online area. The problem is the games and such involve gambling. No, it's not real money, but it's the same argument over violence on TV and Videogames. The intelligent amongst us can deal with it of course, but when the average child is allowed to view violent material from a very young age, it can affect them. Get it? The worry is the same about the gambling.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    3. Re:Freaking hilarious by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 0

      Sure, I get it. Just point me to a study, just a link is fine, that shows that "when the average child is allowed to view violent material from a very young age, it can affect them" and I'll be happy.

      --
      stuff |
    4. Re:Freaking hilarious by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google "I'm Feeling Lucky" for "children exposed to violence at a young age". There are a good number of references at the bottom of that page to start you off. You might also want to try the "non-lucky" Google search for even more information!

      It's almost common knowledge now that children exposed to violence at a very young age, whether it be on TV, Games, Music, or in real life get pretty messed up by it. Friends of mine who were abused at a young age often have to go to psychologists and take medication. I've been lucky enough to have a trouble and violence free life, and I'm just fine and medication-free.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    5. Re:Freaking hilarious by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      It sets kids up for a lifetime of spending money frivolously on cars and street racing...

      Or worse, spray painting their Kia hideous flourescent colors, with fake carbon fiber and mis-matched Shucks plastic rim covers. ::shrudders::

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    6. Re:Freaking hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to completely miss the point and fuck up the issues by mindelessly confusing REAL violence with MTV.

    7. Re:Freaking hilarious by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      The anonymous coward responding before me is right, that study is about ACTUAL violence. Against the child and also against their parent(s) and relatives. Grandparent asked: "Just point me to a study, just a link is fine, that shows that "when the average child is allowed to view violent material from a very young age, it can affect them" and I'll be happy.

      Even your examples of your messed up friends are examples of ACTUAL violence against them, having NOTHING to do with violent media. The only portion of the article you linked to that had anything to do with violent media is this:

      Direct experience has more of an impact on children than indirect experience. Although watching TV violence influences values about violence and perceptions of how often it occurs, it is an indirect experience and "less meaningful in promoting violence than witnessing real life violence." (1)

      In other words, it would seem stopping people from beating their kids and each other in front of their kids would seem a whole lot more important than preventing them from playing GTA, unless you want to imply that GTA makes the adults initiate the violence.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
  19. They are REAL! by fantomas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Favourite quote from the response article

    "There's many, many different species and they're all based on real things, [...] a Scorchio is a dragon," Jacqui said."


    Hmm, I think they better pull this promotion, some people are having big reality problems here. Or maybe I'm not as familiar with Australian fauna as I thought I was....

    1. Re:They are REAL! by Ignignot · · Score: 1

      Scorchio is a dragon

      Clearly you have not recently visited the land of hanna-lee, where a dragon resides by the sea. Dragons can also be found on other planets. Some of them sound a lot like Sean Connery! You should really do some research before posting on slashdot!

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    2. Re:They are REAL! by SamSim · · Score: 1
    3. Re:They are REAL! by Briareos · · Score: 1
      Or maybe I'm not as familiar with Australian fauna as I thought I was....

      You bet you ain't... ;)

      Exhibit A

      np: AFX - Remix By AFX (26 Mixes For Cash (Disc 2))

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    4. Re:They are REAL! by anonymous+moderator · · Score: 1

      My parents keep having two of http://www.reptilia.org/care_sheets/Lizards/csheet s_liz_austwater.htm turning up in their backyard (Sydney, Australia). They are about a meter long.

    5. Re:They are REAL! by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Hmm, I think they better pull this promotion, some people are having big reality problems here. Or maybe I'm not as familiar with Australian fauna as I thought I was....

      Great, we've already got stupid Americans thinking that kangaroos are jumping down every street here, now we're going to have to break the news to them that there aren't dragons flapping about either.

    6. Re:They are REAL! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Don't fret too much, we're just as stupid about our own country too. I used to work around New York City in construction and just before I decided to move back to Oklahoma, I was talking to the electricians on break, mentioning I was going back to Oklahoma. One of the elctricians ( a NY City born & bred one) looked at me like I was crazy and said:" Man, you must be NUTS, Don't they still have Cowboys & Indians out there? F*** That!"

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  20. Great... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 3, Interesting
    , so when a mother discovered her nine-year-old playing online poker to feed his virtual pet, she approached Today Tonight claiming McDonalds was setting her son up for a life of gambling addiction.

    Great, another parent who can't take responsibility to raise their own kid. How about you don't let the kid play the neopet? How about you watch the kid for signs of gambling addiction? How about you take responsibiliy for raising your own kid instead of blaming someone else

  21. Problem with parents. by bludstone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so when a mother discovered her nine-year-old playing online poker to feed his virtual pet, she approached Today Tonight claiming McDonalds was setting her son up for a life of gambling addiction.

    Those are the wrong steps. If she, as a parent, feels that neopets is not good for her child, then you make this rule known to the child, and then enforce it. I fail to see what McDs or neopets has done wrong. I dont really understand the moral crusade, conceptually. Why do other people care, as long as its not hurting them?

    So you think neopets is bad for your kid, then dont let your kid play neopets. Who are you to parent the rest of the world.

    Meh.

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:Problem with parents. by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      I dont really understand the moral crusade, conceptually. Why do other people care, as long as its not hurting them?

      It's a control issue.

      It's also why people run for office. There's personality types out there that just love to fuck with the lives of other people and, sadly, our legal system often allows it.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    2. Re:Problem with parents. by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know they are out there, but I fundamentally do not understand why they love to fuck with the lives of other people.

      Wouldnt they be better off trying to improve their own life?

      Ah well, I suppose these people dont actually apply critical thought to the matter.

      --

      no .sig
    3. Re:Problem with parents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they want to raise awareness?

    4. Re:Problem with parents. by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Of what? The website? This is massive free advertising for neopets.

      --

      no .sig
  22. NeoPets is weird... by davidu · · Score: 4, Informative


    They sent my site, EveryDNS a bunch of threatening letters to take down a site that discussed techniques for winning these point games.

    The weirdest part is that these points have no real monetary value and yet I was being threatened with a lawsuit for providing DNS to another site that had information about their games.

    It's always upsetting when someone tries to pick on the little guys like me but it's even more annoying when they have NO CLAIM!

    I'm not even going to get into the fact that I wasn't the sites ISP or network provider. I was so far removed and acting only as a part of the infrastructure and yet because I wasn't a big company, they picked on me. Can't blame them for being smart I guess...

    -davidu

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
    1. Re:NeoPets is weird... by slashjames · · Score: 1

      So what did you do in response to their claim? Tell them to shove off or cave in?

    2. Re:NeoPets is weird... by davidu · · Score: 3, Informative

      We get these all the time. We treat each case differently. Often times I am able to tell the legal firm who contacts us that we aren't the ISP and that we have no control over the website. Surprisingly, that's often enough.

      In this case, after talking with their lawyer on the phone and knowing him to be serious about making my life suck we contacted the site owner and gave them enough time to move their site without having downtime.

      In other cases we've talked with the EFF, this however, was not the sort of case that would be worth the EFFs efforts. When we got the Diebold Cease and Desist, it was a matter the EFF decided to pursue (and recently 'won').

      -david

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    3. Re:NeoPets is weird... by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No surprise there. Neopets is a member of WISE, the World Institute of Scientology Enterprises. Naturally they're going to follow L. Ron Hubbard's game plan which is to be obnoxious fsckheads making baseless threats using lawyers. (They're also marketing survey spammers as the Dohring group.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:NeoPets is weird... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My gmail account is very generic, and is already attracting lots of attention, but the biggest shock to date has been emails from the neopets lawyer bloke mixing me up with some hacker.

      Nothing really odd about that you might say, apart from the fact, the lawyer in question happens to be one of the biggest Internet law specialists.

      Was strange to see him make the same mistake not just once, but twice (both times I mailed back informing him of his error).

      You would think that somebody who handles such matters would be a little more careful about their email practices, and not send confidential material to free unencrypted accounts.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:NeoPets is weird... by davidu · · Score: 1



      same lawyer...a google search on the lawyer who talked to us was also "an internet expert"...

      -david

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    6. Re:NeoPets is weird... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Certain cases involving porn and actresses?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:NeoPets is weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a person who uses the moniker liquids and he messes around with neopets, exploits it. he owns neotwist, they make bots for neopets.

  23. Re:The Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't you can tie terrorists into everything that goes on in our society.

  24. Don't they have something REAL to worry about ? by SirGeek · · Score: 1
    I mean with Neopets, its neopoints not money.

    It is set so that you can only "win" so many points per per day per game. Granted, you could lose a ton ( perhaps they should implement a Max Loss per day that matches the Win so that if you can't win more than 5K Neopoints a day, you can't lose more than that either.)

    But I mean, Neopets has a bunch of great games to kill time with and unwind ( for adults ) and some actually help kids with memory ( a concentration type game ).

  25. 70 million pets? by MinusBlindfold · · Score: 1

    how many of those pets have died, and people have had to start over again.. thus creating a new account?

    1. Re:70 million pets? by kittyanya · · Score: 1

      There used to be a graveyard when I first started playing 4 + years ago. They then took it out, changed many of the pets, and leaned towards a child's aspect of the game. There are tens of thousands of adults who play the game as well. There are at least 3 guilds alone dedicated to people who are over 21, including the .. Over 21 Guild. I started when I was 19. My mom then got into it, and my older brother. I'm 23 now, have 3 accounts, and I still play everyday.

    2. Re:70 million pets? by Halthar · · Score: 1

      Very very few I would imagine. I spent a small ammount of time on the site about a year ago. I never found it to be all that much fun. I have gone and "fed" my pets twice in the past year due to the daughter of a female friend of mine complaining that my pet was starving. None of them have died, and to the best of my knowledge the pets are unable to die, at least not of starvation.

    3. Re:70 million pets? by tasinet · · Score: 1

      84,937,195 pet owners
      and
      121,787,427 pets.

    4. Re:70 million pets? by T'hain+Esh+Kelch · · Score: 0

      None of the pets can die! They have a very good approach to this.. The pet can have a hunger of dying, but they can never die. A small child would be very sad if their favorite pet died, and therefore they have made it so it cant happen.

    5. Re:70 million pets? by dexterpexter · · Score: 1

      Pets cannot die. However, each account is allowed up to four pets. You may also abandon pets at an adoption agency (which is rather full) and create another one if you are unhappy with the ones you have. There is no limit to the number of times you can leave a pet at the adoption agency. This accounts for the larger amount of pets than there are owners.

      --

      *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
      "We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms."
  26. I play poker with my kids with real money by notthepainter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    5th and 7th grade. We use real money.

    I figure it is the best way for them to learn the dangers of gambling. When you lose your allowance, well it hurts, but not as bad (I'm guessing here...) as when you lose your rent money.

    We play Texas Hold 'Em, 2 cent / 4 cent, 3 limit raise per betting round.

    You can easily loose a $0.50 or a $1 at the table, which is a good chuck of their allowance.

    I figure it teaches them responsibility.

    1. Re:I play poker with my kids with real money by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I wonder if at that age you can already see personality traits coming out. For example a buddy who I play hold 'em with regulary loves the action. He makes crazy calls and when he wins a tourney it's a huge deal(big calls, pretty loose). I, on the other, tend to play tight. I don't win in a big hand of glory, but more so of the slow methodical play.

    2. Re:I play poker with my kids with real money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Except I send my kids off for the summer to the local crack house so that they can learn the dangers of a druggie lifestyle. I figure a few days in jail, a gunshot wound, maybe even getting the clap from the crack whore down the street should teach em to stay away from that kind of stuff.

    3. Re:I play poker with my kids with real money by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1

      I taught one of my daughters blackjack in the 1st grade to help her with her addition drills. It's a whole lot more entertaining than flash cards. We only played for chips, though.

    4. Re:I play poker with my kids with real money by ChrisPee · · Score: 2, Funny
      I figure it is the best way for them to learn the dangers of gambling...You can easily loose a $0.50 or a $1 at the table, which is a good chuck of their allowance.
      And what if they win? Or do you fix the games, just for the good of the children? :)
    5. Re:I play poker with my kids with real money by hai.uchida · · Score: 1

      The parent should actually be modded up because he makes a good point. What if they have a winning streak and get the taste of "free money?" Teaching them the pain of losing at gambling is one thing... But if they happen to have a lucky streak you could be sending the wrong message.

      Dilemnas like this are why I really don't think I want to have kids...

      --
      my password is private, but unchanged.
    6. Re:I play poker with my kids with real money by Aetrix · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah... My dad used to holler "Tax collector" and take a big bite out of all of my candy bars. That was also a life lesson.

      --

      "One touch of Darwin makes the whole world kin." George Bernard Shaw
  27. "Adults" by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    Jacqui Adams, 22, and Anita Esposito, 19, are just two of the thousands of adults hooked on the Neopet games.

    That's a good stretch to call those two 'Adults', even though yes they're over 18 and considered adults in the legal sense in most places.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:"Adults" by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      My wife was addicted to neopets in College. She's also the "owner" of what is probably the last intact Golden Scarab in existence and has over 1.7 million Neopoints. She still uses it from time to time, but for the most part doesn't have time for it.

      So, yeah, they're not real adults quite yet. When they don't have time to play computer games because they have too much other stuff to do (mow the lawn, clean the kitchen, empty cat box, trim the hedges, work), then they're adults.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    2. Re:"Adults" by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      so.. neopets is the limit of being adult then?

      you never known anyone who was an adult and 'hooked' on something? most smokers are adults for example, so are most people who "just have to see the match every week".

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  28. Sounds right. wouldn't want my kids learning that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry, but having an addictive game for kids to play poker and blackjack for more chips doesn't seem very educational to me. It's not like the 1970s where things were less stimulating but you actually learned stuff. Everything today especially dealing is so heavily stimulating and exploitive, it will just lead to problems in the future.

    For example, when I learned math, I had exercises that I had to do with a textbook, pencil and pad of paper. It was boring, but I learned, and eventually learned how to study on my own. Nowadays, you need to have an educational game to make kids "learn". Tell me how this doesn't lead to kids getting bored from learning from an instruction book or during class? How will they possibly be able to learn to sit through a lecture without getting bored and not being constantly stimulated?

    I'm now back in grad school after being out of school for 15 years, and I was astonished to see a 20-something kid playing his pocket Nintendo in the middle of a lecture. He's paying $2500 for this course, and he's so bored that he has to play a video game in the middle of a lecture? Incredible.

    Kids need to learn without having all those flashing lights, adrenaline rush, etc, otherwise they'll grow up to be true ADD adults.

  29. is it just me or... by greymond · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is there some kind of super insane overly conservative group of people breeding rapidly? It seems everwhere I look there is someone or some group complaining about things that are so trivial in comparison to things like guns and drugs in schools...

    It's like "they" want to find evil in everything.

    1. Re:is it just me or... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      The media intentionally creates fear because it gets them ratings, which in turn generates more profit.

    2. Re:is it just me or... by Pragmatix · · Score: 1

      I think George Carlin hit the nail on the head when he ranted about the cult of the child here in the US (applies elsewhere). Many of the conservative reactions to todays issues are wrapped up in the whole 'think of the children' rhetoric. What makes it worse is at the same time it seems parent's willingess to expend their personal energy in protecting their children is waning in favor of a government that will do it all for them.

    3. Re:is it just me or... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I've said this before...

      Conservatism in the US is on the rise because it is fashionable. It's the cool thing to do. It's the pendulum swinging back (come on, we knew it had to happen). In another 20 years, people will get bored with it, and we'll swing back toward liberalism again.

      There are a small number of real whack-jobs for whom this conservative boom will be a great advantage. They'll be able to get their insane, extremist messages out because they aren't as relatively "extreme" anymore. But the same goes for the left as well as the right. We used to have nutjobs from Greenpeace on the evening news. Now we have religious nutjobs.

      I don't fret about it, because it's all hollow anyway. Nobody on either side really believes anything they say, they are simply following the herd.

  30. Typical of Today Tonight by ttys00 · · Score: 5, Informative

    That "current affairs" show is utter crap. They sensationalise all sorts of mundane things just to get viewers to watch. Anything for ratings. There are better alternatives on SBS (another channel), but hey, no one watches anything other than channels 7,9, and 10.

    Disclaimer: I'm an Aussie and disgusted with the crappy tv we have to put up with.

    1. Re:Typical of Today Tonight by Locky · · Score: 1

      Please mod this up, as an Australian living in Canada, I remember good laughs from watching A Current Affair and Today Tonight.

      It is a sensationalist, reactionary, show that appeals to the conservative masses. They frequently run stories scapegoating immigrants (Lebanese is a popular one), dole bludgers (what the show calls people on welfare), video games (absolute zealots on this issue, you can be guaranteed an anti-videogame story at least once or twice a month) and in general, promoting ignorance and bias.

      There is no journalistic integrity with these people, they don't report news, they make it.

    2. Re:Typical of Today Tonight by lendude · · Score: 1
      I concur (I'm also an ozzie).

      The thing about TT is it's one of a bunch of 'hysterics masquerading as reporting' programs competing for the Lowest Common Denominator demographic. You know the type of shit stories - 'please think of the children', 'evil-in-our-midst internet porn', 'welfare ripoffs (funnily enough having a bet each way with both welfare cheats and the welfare system ripping off deserving familes', 'my neighbour's noisy parrot is driving me crazy' etc etc.

      Sad thing is they are proliferating - which speaks volumes about the intellectual state of middle Australia.

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
    3. Re:Typical of Today Tonight by KontinMonet · · Score: 1

      Is it Murdoch owned by any chance?

      --
      Did he inhale?
    4. Re:Typical of Today Tonight by euxneks · · Score: 1

      News Flash: The rest of the World's TV isn't any better.. (Speaking from experience with most N.A. T.V. channels...)

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    5. Re:Typical of Today Tonight by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0
      which speaks volumes about the intellectual state of middle Australia.

      Not to mention last weeks election result.

      The bit which I find so hard to take is that Howard has been rewarded for the mistakes he has made: Iraq, Children Overboard, WMD's

      If he had a reduced majority he would at least have been told to change direction

    6. Re:Typical of Today Tonight by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0
      Is it Murdoch owned by any chance?

      I don't think so but it is certainly Murdoch inspired

    7. Re:Typical of Today Tonight by lendude · · Score: 1

      So true - and it really shits me that the balance of power in the senate has been given up. It'll come home to roost...

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
  31. Don't make me laugh so loud at work! by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the Today Tonight article:

    Jacqui Adams, 22, and Anita Esposito, 19, are just two of the thousands of adults hooked on the Neopet games. They're now fearful the site could be shut down altogether.

    "There's many, many different species and they're all based on real things, like a Lupe is a dog, a Scorchio is a dragon," Jacqui said.

    AAAAAHAHAAHHA! What kind of a response is that? Sounds like a 5 year old describing their Duplo construction.

    Lupe is a dog, and Scorchio is a dragon! They're based on real things! We have a winner for today's "You're Not Helping Yourself Any" Award.

    1. Re:Don't make me laugh so loud at work! by julesh · · Score: 1

      Lupe is a dog

      I would have thought, based on the name, that it is a wolf.

  32. Neopets is evil... by eurleif · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But that's not why. Their stated mission isn't to provide a fun game for kids to play, it's to maximize advertising revenue. They have marketing studies talking about children as though they're consumers waiting to be advertised to and nothing else. Their "immersive advertising" technique is horrible; most children can't even tell the difference between the ads and the game. In a nutshell, they're a marketing company with a game attached.

    1. Re:Neopets is evil... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Eurleif, I understand why you might feel this way, but you need to put yourself in their shoes for a second.

      You have a client, and the client wants more customers. You don't go pitching that client on how you have a nice and fluffy site for kids, because you're not pitching the site to kids. You want to put it in terms the clients marketers can understand, so you refer to the children as potential consumers. Its business language because those studies are for business use.

      I'm in advertising/marketing, and while I personally feel that the concept of building brand recognition at a young age is not nearly as valuable as people in the industry currently think (just another fad), allow me to explain how it works. They hope that by letting kids play the games, the kid will take the company images that they constantly see (logo, characters, items, etc) and associate it with the good feelings they get when they play the game and achieve things. They are in essence playing off the psychology of it.

      But you are right, they are a marketing company who's product is the eyeballs of the gamers, and their method of getting those eyeballs is through the games. But on the flipside, they do provide a cool interactive world that has a lot of socialization and some interesting challenging games. Even if they are just marketing material. I don't recall anybody getting up in arms over Candystand and the like.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Neopets is evil... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Consumers have been pimping toys to children since Barbie, a doll based on another doll, which is in turn based on a cartoon prostitute. Welcome to America!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Neopets is evil... by Ironica · · Score: 1
      Their stated mission isn't to provide a fun game for kids to play, it's to maximize advertising revenue.

      And this is different from every other business on earth... how? Oh, yeah, some businesses didn't follow the revenue-maximizing model. But they went under.

      If they provide games which are not fun, they cannot maximize advertising revenue, so they pretty much have as a mission to do both.
      They have marketing studies talking about children as though they're consumers waiting to be advertised to and nothing else.

      That's because the company that bought half of Neopets when the original founders were running out of bandwidth and server space *is* a market research firm, after all. They figured that they could collect some interesting data as a side thing.

      Now, Neopets is the main business, and the other market research stuff is the people in the corner of the office. Funny, that.
      Their "immersive advertising" technique is horrible; most children can't even tell the difference between the ads and the game.

      Don't you mean to say, "Their 'immersive advertising' technique is *fantastic*; most children can't even tell the difference..." because, after all, that sounds incredibly successful.

      However, the only kids who can't tell the difference between the sponsored games and the non-sponsored games are the ones who can't read the phrase "THIS IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT" across the bottom of the game's splash screen.
      In a nutshell, they're a marketing company with a game attached.

      They used to be, as mentioned above. But a large majority of the content on the site is sponsor-independent, and *none* of the sponsored games are in the main games listing (i.e. if you go there to play a game, and start looking through the selections, you won't find the sponsored games... you'll only find them from the ads in the little tiny box at the bottom left of your screen, which advertises *all* the games on a rotation, whether sponsored or not).

      Sounds like you have a tiny bit of information about the company, which you've blown up into some kind of evil Neopian conspiracy. Did a chia kill your father or something?
      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    4. Re:Neopets is evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And that's not all--they were founded and are run by Scientologists. How do I know? I applied for a programmer's job there about a year ago.

      It seemed normal enough when I went in and the interview with the screener seemed to go OK, but then they wanted me to take some '"intelligence tests".

      As I was taking the tests I couldn't help but feel that there was something strange about them, but I put these feelings aside for the most part since I wanted to make a good impression. And get the damn job. ;-) After I finished the first test (and they told me that I passed) they gave me a second one. Now *this* test teetered on the edge of bizarre, but I figured "What the hell, might as well get it over with".

      It wasn't until I finished the second test that I saw the copyright. And the copyright said:

      (C) 199X L. Ron Hubbard

      Needless to say, I wasn't too disappointed to learn that I didn't get the job. It was one of the most bizarre interviews I have ever gone through.

      Poster anonymously so that the Co$ doesn't sic their attack dogs on me...

    5. Re:Neopets is evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, wait... you're telling me they want to sell toys to children and have thought up an effective advertising method to do so? THEY MUST BE STOPPED!

    6. Re:Neopets is evil... by kisielk · · Score: 1
      And this is different from every other business on earth... how? Oh, yeah, some businesses didn't follow the revenue-maximizing model. But they went under.


      Actually, I think most businesses seek to maximize profit. ie: It doesn't do you any good to have $10 billion revenue and $20 billion expenditures...
    7. Re:Neopets is evil... by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      They actually foisted Co$ garbage upon you during the interviewing process as some form of "employment test"? Wow. I knew about their ties to CoS before (and they *do* run deep), but I had no clue it drizzled down all the way to their hiring practices.

      Not only is that scummy, it may very well violate US labor laws. Congrats on not getting the job! :-P

    8. Re:Neopets is evil... by borovan · · Score: 1

      Heh, rubbish...

      The focus of Neopets is primarily games and exciting content. It was not started to make money at all, but with 8 billion pageviews a month we have to or the site would not exist.

      Marketing, Immersive Advertising, all these things were not even considered when the site was founded, they are simply a necessity, and we approach it in a much better way than most sites (no popups, no horrible flash ads floating in the middle of the screen)

      We do specifically state that pages with advertisements on are actually paid for by sponsors, in caps no less at the bottom of each page.

      How do I know this? I founded the company, so there.

      Adam

    9. Re:Neopets is evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And BTW, Adam is not a scientologist.

    10. Re:Neopets is evil... by eurleif · · Score: 1

      I understand your point of view, and I respect it, but I disagree.

      The CEO of Neopets Inc., Doug Dohring, owns a market research company called The Dohring Company. How can you claim that a company led by a market researcher isn't about marketing?

      You're right about the games having notices, but really, how many children do you think are going to notice miniscule text at the bottom of the page -- especially when it's below the "fold" (that is, where the bottom of the browser window is when scrolled to the top) at most resolutions? There's not even a notice within the games themselves.

      Adam, if that's really you, I don't think you're evil. I think you made a mistake by letting Doug Dohring buy Neopets, but everyone's made mistakes. If I were you, I would at least consider quitting Neopets if it continues to use subversive techniques like immersive advertising; please give it some thought.

    11. Re:Neopets is evil... by psychomagic · · Score: 1
      Hey Adam,

      If its actually you, I invite you to respond on my blog at http://www.ghsouthern.org.au/gurublog/

      About 10 days before this blew up here in Australia, I emailed your legal department warning them that this could happen. Unfortunately I got no response. I am not the source (and don't know exactly who they are) of the media stories both in a major newspaper here and the Today Tonight story, but I am close enough (move in the same channels) that if something had been done it may have been able to be stopped or at least have been painted in a more acceptable light.

      However I would like to give you a right of reply straight from the top rather than second hand.

      Keith AKA Gambling Guru
      Check out my blog at http://www.ghsouthern.org.au/gurublog/

  33. Moderation is the key by scruffy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Some fat is good, but fat is bad if you eat too much of it.

    Some alcohol is good, but alcohol is bad if you drink too much of it.

    Some gambling is good (I fondly remember many nights of penny ante poker with college friends), but gambling is bad if you do too much of it (e.g., interfering with studies or making you poor).

    Drugs are good, but drugs are bad if you do too much of them.

    Pretty much any behavior (excluding criminal acts, libel, etc.) is good or ok in moderation, but bad if you do too much of it. If you simply prohibit potentially bad behaviors, then how do you learn to act with moderation? Too many people have a "don't do it" attitude to most everything, which I think in the end is counterproductive.

    1. Re:Moderation is the key by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      Then again, in Singapore, selling chewing gum used to be a criminal act.

      I say, let the parent's decide.

    2. Re:Moderation is the key by Pragmatix · · Score: 1

      To play devil's advocate, children do not usually have the capability or judgement required to handle things in moderation. Also certain experiences are probably best left to adulthood--ideally when a person has the intellectual and emotional maturity to best handle it. Of course the parent's job is to screen out such experiences .. But hey, why bother when the government will do it for you!

    3. Re:Moderation is the key by Jtheletter · · Score: 1

      As I always say: moderation in all things, moderation doubly so.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    4. Re:Moderation is the key by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      The only way for a person to know their limits is to test those limits. The best time in life to do that is when you have someone to protect you while you do it. The biggest risk to children is when a parent or a friend's parent does something but hides it from the child, and the child gets into it and hurts themselves. Adulthood is when you have the intellectual and emotional maturity to say no and moderate yourself. It's not a magical switch time; it's something you develop, hopefully with the help of your parents.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  34. if only they had used number munchers... by fat-latvian · · Score: 2

    ...instead of blackjack. Then maybe the kids could've improved their math skills while getting to feed their virtual pet.

    Besides, math skills will them in their future career as a compulsive gambler.

    1. Re:if only they had used number munchers... by tasinet · · Score: 1

      There's games that help with maths skills as well.
      Try this
      There's just a LOT of games there.
      There's a stockmarket, arcade games, action games, card games, luck/chance games etc.
      And there are items such as needles and shots to cure your pet when it's sick.

      So, this site had the target of making kids workaholics, nerds, gambling addicts, and drug addicts. Burn it.

      I mean, for all the porn and REAL gambling you can find online, a kids' site bothered that mom? whatever.

  35. Neopets by demon_2k · · Score: 0

    I agree with people who say that Neopets is bad for kids. It teaches kids how to play and bet, with virtual maney. Start young...and halp the kids develop into gamblers...

  36. As a parent... by neomac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... of a child who has a "neopet," it's like anything else on the Internet that's aimed at kids: you, the responsible parent, have to know what your child visits on the Internet, make rules, set boundaries and impose limitations.

    Any game of "chance" is gambling. The difference is the stakes. In Monopoly, it's fake money. Neopets is a point system. In Vegas, it's cash. With Microsoft, it's your data. At least with neopets, they're not telling the kids to take the "little green pieces of paper" out of mommy's purse. It's more like those damn tamaguchis...

    BTW, I ROCK at Bilge Dice.

    1. Re:As a parent... by borovan · · Score: 1

      Do you have the Bilge Dice Avatar though? :)

    2. Re:As a parent... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0
      have to know what your child visits on the Internet, make rules, set boundaries and impose limitations.

      My nephew was over here recently with his parents for a party. He wanted to use my PC so I showed him how to get to www.nasa.gov (he is 9 years old) and suggested he have a look at stuff on the mars rovers, etc

      I went back to check on him 10 minutes later and he (and his younger sister) had gravitated to some child-oriented online game provided by the same site. It kept them amused for the next hour.

      Yes, you have to set boundaries, but if given a choice, kids will just do kids stuff

      Note that I didn't just show them google and say "search for anything". I picked a large site with guaranteed safe content.

  37. You have to love double standards... by FozzieCDN · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These parents and their BS groups crack me up. Really they do. They are so rife with double standards and hipocracy that I am certain if you ever put a mirror in front of them they would attack it for morally corrupting society and the groups demands to have a say in how they raise your children. Its never the individual parents fault for not paying attention to what their kids are doing, its always societies fault.

    It's apparently okay with them to give out Barbie toys to little girls and enforce the stereo type that you should be a little prissy California princess with size DDD breasts and a 6 inch waist to be beautiful, but its wrong to give out some nice plush Neopet toys (they are really nice quality) as a part of the McDonals Happy Meal cross-promotion gimmick? Or better yet, its okay with these groups to allow kids to see and play voilent video games... just as long as it's cartoon voilence?

    So I guess the solution for NeoPets is to sell this off as cartoon gambling? That way its okay because it works for voilence doesn't it?

    1. Re:You have to love double standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no. With these groups, any sort of video game violence, from GTA:VC to Mario jumping on a goomba, is absolutely abhorrent and destructive to the moral fibre of society. Meanwhile, violent movies emphasising sadistic behavior are A-OK.

    2. Re:You have to love double standards... by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

      "...it's wrong to give out some nice plush Neopet toys ... as a part of the McDonalds Happy Meal cross-promotion gimmick?"

      I think the real crime is that parents are taking their children to McDonalds. There's plenty of food out there that's much higher quality.

    3. Re:You have to love double standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, they make a mean spicy chicken. Only 99 cents.

      No, I was not paid, I was just hungry, damn. Now I want one...

  38. Heh by Ikn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Think what you will, but despite the very, very kiddy-ish graphics, the game has some very interesting and entertaining systems, most notably the Battledome combat system. I played it for about a solid year, and it can be very fun, getting different weapons and battling. Some of the expensive paint themes you can get for different pets are very cool, even to adults. So unless you've played it, don't knock it as just for kids. I guaruntee the majority of people playing are over 14-15.

    --
    I know nothing
    1. Re:Heh by TwistedTR · · Score: 1

      Have to back you up on this. The BD is pretty darn fun and is the only part of the site I play with. As for age group, I would say the average NP user (who didn't lie about their age as that is a MAJOR issue) is 14-25. Yes, 25. Also, when you sign up for an account, if you don't lie about your age and you are 16 years old, you need to fill out a parental consent form and mail it to NeoPets if you want to unlock large segments of the site.

    2. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I guaruntee the majority of people playing are over 14-15.
      You'd be wrong. I work for Neopets and the mean user age is 13.
  39. It happened to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I know it sounds weird... I was addicted to neopets at one time, and I'm 26. I neglected my job, my girlfriend, and even my cat. When I got bored of the neopets games, I wrote perl LWP scripts to cheat.

    Here's my old pet... I finally forced myself to adopt my pet, and closed the account permenantly.

    posting anon because of the shame of it all...

    1. Re:It happened to me. by OwlofCreamCheese · · Score: 1

      dude... I just download the .swf files and use a decompiler... you can find all sorts of things. like peanut toss is the same game as 'air bud' and they never took the air bud questions out of the source, just don't call the function anymore.

      --
      -You're wasting your time. Alfador only likes me.
  40. Um ... by Heisenbug · · Score: 1

    This is offtopic, but I hope no one is gambling real money on Neopets. The thing is, my little brother hacked it a couple of years ago, back when he was 13 years old and had that kind of free time. He set up a little web form that would let him submit any score he wanted for any of their games.

    Of course, not wanting to spoil anyone's fun, he only used it once to get #11 on some ranking or other, and they may have switched to a non-laughably trivial encryption scheme since then. Still, the best use of Neopets may be to teach you what happens when you compete on a website you don't control with people you don't know ...

  41. SimSlots by pyr0 · · Score: 1

    Just wait until their kids find this website. It is completely pointless to anyone that knows anything. However the fact that the virtual slots pay out at a much higher rate than real ones may fool some naive folks.

    1. Re:SimSlots by Animats · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not pointless. Put in your E-mail address and you'll receive lots of interesting messages about how you can enhance your sex life and obtain home mortgages.

    2. Re:SimSlots by tasinet · · Score: 2, Funny

      WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
      Do you want slashdot shut down because WE ARE ADVERTISING SLOTS TO OUR 14 YEAR-OLD AUDIENCE?

  42. Yep. It takes lots of time by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    and a bit too much sacrifice at times. (Right now happens to be one of those times dammit!)

    So, the bigger question is what to do with Neopets?

    Just because parents are lazy and their kids might get into gambling on Neopets, does that mean Neopets should have to do something about it?

    Worried parents could just add the site to their censorware and call it good I suppose.

  43. Very Uninformed Story by TwistedTR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So my girlfriend is addicted to neopets and over the last 3 years I've had a pretty good view of the site. This story is pretty much uninformed. The gambling games make up about 4% of the total games on the site. Your pet only goes to the adoption agency if you do not play with it and it gets unhappy with you, actually sitting there ignoring your pet playing gambling games will hasten this, but not cause it. NeoPoints (the in-game currency) are very easy to come by, and 15-20 minutes of playing any of the other 96% of the games the player has between 5-10k worth, which is enough to pretty do whatever you want for over a month or two.

    So whats to stop the kid from going to yahoo games and playing blackjack there?

  44. Further proof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of how irrelevant Australia is. They seem to raise a stink over EVERYTHING. Stop posting Australian news to /.

  45. education is strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Gambling is a vice that many people cannot resist - it destroys lives. It's also an essential habit, risk taking, for anyone hoping for success. Gambling is everywhere for everyone. So shielding children from it is sure only to deprive them of the chance to learn how to gamble wisely, and recognize its seductive allure as a risk in itself. Educating children in the ways of gambling makes them better people, and better able to exercise self control. Of course, that might require parents to play with their kids and their Neopets. Which isn't as much fun for many parents as ranting about "bad influences", though a lot more risky.

    "IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH" - Oceania motto, George Orwell's _1984_

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  46. Re:Yep. It takes lots of time by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
    Well, honestly, if Neopets were more concerned about being a decent corporate citizen instead of making sucking kids into their toys, I'd bet they would have come up with other "games" that weren't so overt.

    The problem with censorware is that most parents don't use that, either.
    The parents that you need to worry about are the ones that allow totally unfettered access to everything.

  47. Well, you can always let them work it off! by PotatoHead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's not so bad really.

    After they are feeling the joy of being broke, a little extra work just might reinforce the responsibility issues while giving them some hope of that next trip to the movies with their friends...

  48. Re:Yep. It takes lots of time by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
    "...making sucking kids into..."???

    I need to take lunch. My brain just isn't functioning. :/

  49. Teach self-control! by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Pretty much amazing how to mother turns against McDo (court gambling?) rather than take her responsabilities and teach her values to her kid rather than trying to cut him out from the reality. Is it to say this kid when no longer surprotected will start gambling because it's not completely forbidden?

    How do you teach self-control if there is nothing attractive?

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  50. What's the big deal? by E5Qk6XRwBm · · Score: 0

    There's a soup faerie in Vegas, right? If I ever lose all my money to gambling, I'll just go there til I get back on my feet. Vegetable soup is my fav! (Sammycheekles)

  51. Re:Neopets is evil... - advertising information by ccevans · · Score: 1

    For more information on this, see http://info.neopets.com/aboutus/pressreleases.phtm l and http://info.neopets.com/aboutus/page06.phtml.

    The market research is particularly interesting. 52% of respondents to a survey liked having "Featured Products" on the web site? The written responses to that survey are also rather frightening.

  52. Been to Chuck E. Cheese before? by 93,000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (Slightly off topic but related)

    Those places are probably subsidized by the Vegas Tourisim Comission.

    If you are not familiar with them, kids play games to win tickets, which they use to buy stuff (read: crap -- spend 5 bucks in quarters to win enough tickets to buy a friggin Sponge Bob pencil). This has been going on for years with skee ball, whak-a-mole type games. A rip off, yes. But harmless fun.

    But in the last several years roulette wheel type games have shown up, which actually have progressive jackpots to win x number of tickets. Not to be a prude, but I think we're letting kids get hooked on the excitement of the 'big win' (which is the allure of gambling more so than the actual money [or prize, tickets, etc.] won).

    1. Re:Been to Chuck E. Cheese before? by vhold · · Score: 1

      The roulette type games, are you talking about the 'Stop the blinking light' type things? They are mostly skilled based, but I guess I have to agree that they do evoke images of gambling and in some sense, while it's easy to constantly get the lights right -next- to jackpot, actually getting the jackpot itself seems to be totally luck.

      Maybe thats even more insidious then a pure luck game, although it wouldn't be as insidious as carnival games. But in my mind, being exposed to carnival games was an intensely good experience as that's where I learned that people will setup traps to take your money.

      The funny trap with ticket games it's relatively too complex overall for a kid to understand. Most kids aren't able to keep track of the fact that the money they spent getting tickets could have bought them way more stuff then they could ever possibly hope to get on spending tickets. Even if they win the 200 ticket jackpot on one lucky press, they'll probably get something that cost a buck. Eventually though they do figure it out for the most part I think and that's a good lesson too, and the games are relatively fun.

  53. Christ this is so uninformed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Obviously nobody speaking out against Neopets has ever played the damn game!

    So you have to "gamble" to win money to buy food to feed your pets or they'll be sent to orphanage? That's news to me:

    a) Gambling is a loaded term. The selection of games are no different than what you'd see on any other gaming website.
    b) Playing games earns you points, trophies, and in-game currency--if that were the only way to earn money then I'd say it might be a problem but it isn't. You can trade items, sell items in your shop, challenge other people to Pokemon-style battles, solve puzzles/riddles, collect interest from the bank, engage in their in-game stock market, hold auctions, or simply get it for free at the donation room(Money Tree).
    c) Buying food is one way to get food. There are also a half-dozen rooms to find free food that can be used to feed all your pets and the room resets every day.
    d) Feeding your pets is entirely optional. I've gone months without feeding them and the only thing that changes is the text indicating how hungry they are--don't feed them for long enough and the text will show they are 'dying' but that's it because pets don't die...ever. - period
    e) You never lose your pets to the orphanage. You have a four pet limit and if you want to get a new pet you have to make room which is where the orphanage comes in.

    These people need to get a clue!

  54. Creative Financing by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Monopoly teaches good money management otherwise you go bankrupt.

    My kids are into this in a major way. One of my daughters got creative with the system. She has a derelict account she uses as a holding entity for her neopoints. This allows her to amass huge amounts of points while her real account can be "on welfare". Great! My daughter is learning how to become a welfare queen and milk the system. :-D

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    1. Re:Creative Financing by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it sounds like your daughter is growing up to be a fine accountant. Give her 15 years and you'll be going to her for financial advice.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    2. Re:Creative Financing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like she's going to be a fucking feminist pig bitch whore. GREAT parenting.

  55. I don't agree. by PotatoHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For all their marketing, I just don't see that many Neopets laying around. In fact, around here they are hard to find.

    I actually had to look in a few different Clairs stores to find a decent selection of them. They are not as common as the action toys tied to the cartoons and the kids get more education from the site than they would from the toons.

    Seems to be a decent tradeoff to me. My kids could be finding far worse things to do. And yes, there are better things to do outside.

    Guess I am one of those parents you had better be worrying about. My kids get the same connection I do. The catch: I must remain involved and I log their traffic.

    Just knowing the log is there does more to reinforce good behaviour than any lame, easily cracked censorware does.

    THE PARENTS THAT DO USE CENSORWARE ARE THE PROBLEM.

    You have to surf with your kids plain 'n simple; otherwise, they are going to be adopting some one elses value system, not yours. This makes me believe parents who use censorware have a weak value system composed mostly of fear and ignorance. Baah....

    Funny too, when they know there is a log, they will be happy to come and talk about what happened. This is always better than not.

    I'm probably going to get flamed for this, but what the hell....

    All of my kids are getting near straight A grades in school. No crime, no drugs, well respected in their peer groups.

    Our family has no taboo becuase ignorance is weakness and places those that subscribe to it at a clear disadvantage to those that don't. Tough subjects are important to young people. They *will* get the information. Who better to set the primary expectations than you?

    The real world is not always a nice place. Thugs, porn, disease, scammers, you name it, it's all there right? Who do these people pray on? The naive, ignorant, and fearful, and sometimes the unlucky. The net is the exact same way.

    Being a good citizen means knowing your rights and responsibilities and setting the right expectations for those you interact with. Depending on other entities, to exhibit good behaviour is so totally passive aggressive as to make me sick frankly.

    How to cope and make a difference in the world? Vote with your feet. Don't like the value proposition Neopets brings to the table? Don't visit and let others know why. That is your right and responsibility to do so.

    However, don't ask Neopets to give up their rights too.

    Everybody knows Neopets wants you to buy their toys. Instead of blaring their message in a passive mind-numbing cartoon, they choose to put up a fun, educational and interactive community almost anyone can enjoy.

    What's wrong with that? Seems to me they are honoring their obligations as a citizen as well as they can be frankly.

    You need to take a more active role in things along with just about everyone else that says what you just did. My family knows their rights and how to set expectations. When those are not met, we move on to where they are and let others know why, just as I did here. Making clear choices is one of the most important skills young people can learn. Empowering them to actually make those choices is the difference between future leaders and everybody else.

    Sadly, the only real check on corporations today is your dollars. Vote with your feet early and often and talk about why to your family and friends. It works. More people should be doing it.

    I don't mean to flame you with the above. Don't take it personal. This is important stuff. Consider my view and contrast it with your own and get something good from it. Might do you some good, might not...

    1. Re:I don't agree. by VE3ECM · · Score: 1
      I'm not a parent, yet. Soon enough, I imagine.

      I don't take anything personally on here... in fact, while we don't see eye to eye on some things, on the important things we seem to mesh.
      I hope your children thank you everyday for having such a good parent.

    2. Re:I don't agree. by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Your words are inspiration. I dont have any kids yet, I'm in my early 20's, and I believe what you just said is exactly how my parents, may they rest in peace, felt about these subjects. More parents need to learn to actually play an active role in their kids lives and at the same time give them the freedom to learn, make mistakes, and learn from those mistakes while they have parents there with them. and your right about the parents who rely on censorware, thats like using the v-chip in your tv, or security through obscurity, its just not going to work. from a kid thats grown up and thanks his lucky stars for having the parents that cared, take this to heart.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  56. If this is gambling... by Deathlizard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...Then the 1up machine in Super Mario Bros 2 was too, and a blatent one at that. I played that game constantly in the day and I dont have any urge whatsover to play a slot machine.

  57. Reserved Neopets domains by AndroidCat · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Neopets has bought hundreds of domains, including quite a few negative ones. So you'll have to be a bit creative if you want to put up a spoof or blah-sucks type site (and they will hassle you for it):

    acara.biz, aisha.biz, blumaroo.biz, blumaroo.com, blumaroo.info, blumaroo.net, brightvale.com, chia.biz, chia.info, chiapop.com, chiapops.com, chomby.biz, chomby.com, chomby.info, chomby.net, cybunny.biz, cybunny.com, cybunny.info, cybunny.net, doglefox.com, elephante.biz, elephante.info, elephante.net, eyrie.biz, eyrie.info, flotsam.biz, flotsam.info, fuckneopets.biz, fuckneopets.com, fuckneopets.info, fuckneopets.net, fuckneopets.org, gelert.biz, gelert.info, getneopoints.com, grarrl.biz, grarrl.com, grarrl.info, grarrl.net, grundo.biz, grundo.info, ihateneopets.com, jetsam.biz, jetsam.info, jubjub.biz, jubjub.info, kacheek.biz, kacheek.com, kacheek.info, kacheek.net, kadoatie.com, kau.biz, kau.info, kiko.biz, kiko.info, korbat.biz, korbat.com, korbat.info, korbat.net, kougra.biz, kougra.com, kougra.info, kougra.net, kreludor.com, kyrii.biz, kyrii.com, kyrii.info, kyrii.net, legendoftalador.com, legendsoftalador.com, lenny.biz, lenny.info, lupe.biz, lupe.info, meerca.biz, meerca.com, meerca.info, meerca.net, mobileneo.biz, mobileneo.com, mobileneo.info, mobileneo.net, mobileneo.org, mobileneopets.biz, mobileneopets.com, mobileneopets.info, moehog.biz, moehog.com, moehog.info, moehog.net, mynci.biz, mynci.info, mynci.net, myneopet.biz, myneopet.com, myneopet.info, myneopets.biz, myneopets.com, myneopets.info, myneopia.com, ne0pets.biz, ne0pets.info, neoauctions.com, neocircles.com, neocoins.com, neocollege.com, neoencyclopedia.com, neogreeting.com, neogreetings.biz, neogreetings.com, neogreetings.info, neogreetings.net, neogreetings.org, neokids.com, neomapping.com, neomaps.com, neomessages.com, neomessaging.biz, neomessaging.com, neomessaging.info, neomessaging.net, neomessaging.org, neopals.biz, neopals.info, neopals.net, neopals.org, neopedia.biz, neopedia.info, neopedia.org, neopest.com, neopests.com, neopet.biz, neopet.info, neopet.net, neopetasia.com, neopetasia.info, neopetasia.net, neopetasia.org, neopets.biz, neo-pets.com, neopets.info, neopets.org, neopetsasia.biz, neopetsasia.com, neopetsasia.info, neopetsasia.net, neopetsasia.org, neopetsauctions.com, neopetsboycott.com, neopetscardgame.com, neopetsgame.com, neopetsinc.com, neopetsjapan.biz, neopetsjapan.com, neopetsjapan.info, neopetsjapan.net, neopetsjapan.org, neopetslogin.com, neopetslogin.info, neopetslogin.net, neopetslogin.org, neopetsmagazine.com, neopetssuck.com, neopetstcg.com, neopetstcg.info, neopetstcg.net, neopetsthemovie.com, neopetstradingcardgame.com, neopetstradingcardgame.info, neopetstradingcardgame.net, neopetstradingcards.com, neopetsuck.com, neopetswinner.com, neopettcg.com, neopetting.com, neopettradingcardgame.com, neopetz.com, neopetz.net, neopia.biz, neopia.info, neopia.net, neopiabroadcasting.com, neopiaentertainment.com, neopian.biz, neopian.info, neopian.net, neopian.org, neopiantales.com, neopiantimes.biz, neopiantimes.com, neopiantimes.info, neopiantimes.net, neopiantimes.org, neopiaproductions.com, neopiastudios.biz, neopiastudios.com, neopiastudios.info, neopiastudios.net, neopiastudios.org, neopinions.com, neopoints.biz, neopoints.com, neopoints.info, neopoints.net, neopoints.org, neopte.com, neopts.com, neoptz.com, neoputz.com, neoquests.com, neosurveys.com, neoswap.com, neowear.info, neowear.net, newpets.net, nimmo.biz, nimmo.info, noepet.com, noepets.com, noepets.net, npdomains.com, officialneowear.biz, officialneowear.com, officialneowear.info, officialneowear.net, officialneowear.org, peophin.biz, peophin.com, peophin.info, petpet.biz, petpet.info, petpetadventures.com, pocketneopet.biz, pocketneopet.com, pocketneopet.info, pocketneopet.net, pocketneopet.org, poogle.biz, poogle.info, poogle.net, pteri.biz, pteri.com, pteri.info, pteri.net, quiggle.biz, quiggle.info, rareitemcode.biz, rareitemcode.com, rareitemcode.info, rareitemcode.net, rareitemcode.org, scorchio.biz, scorchio.info, shoyru.biz, shoyru.c

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Reserved Neopets domains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just put the word 'super' in front of any of these names and you're set. For instance: www.superneopetting.com

  58. logical flaw here... by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

    ...the Neopets message boards went nuts...

    This statement implies that the Neopets message boards were not *already* nuts. As a good friend of several Neopets players, I can assure you that this is not the case. While a slight majority of Neopets players are mostly sane, the whole endeavor represents an act of collective insanity, sort of like the Salem Witchcraft Trials, the popular belief that the 9/11 Hijackers were Iraqi, and Britney Spears's fan base, though far less destructive than all 3 of these.

    Anyway, poker teaches valuable skills, like quickly estimating probabilities and expectations, economic principles like sunk costs, and discipline. Anything that's fun can be addictive. Given that children don't have much of a concept of their time being worth anything, their valuation of virtual credits on Neopets is likely to be substantially less than adults who do things like purchase Everquest items on eBay. I'm really much more worried about the adults here, but if we as a society don't let people play poker with fake money to feed fake pets; alcohol, premarital sex, and bungie jumping will be the next to go, and that's not a world I want to live in.

  59. Re:Yep. It takes lots of time by russellh · · Score: 1

    Yes.. but eventually society has to come to grips with the role of advertisers and children in general. will children always be prey to predatory corporations? Children have much more exposure to society at large than ever before, and yet play a smaller role it in (eg the separation of work / family). Children are bigger targets and have less responsibility. Less parental interaction with children. Less adult interaction with children in general. More government power over children (eg education and health standards) and families. Not good trends.

    --
    must... stay... awake...
  60. Quite tired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of parents blaming society and multimedia for something they can regulate themselves. Perhaps instead of blasting an organization for creating something that they think is "taboo", perhaps they should take the time to educate their own offspring. Parents should take the time to see what their child is doing from day to day. If it doesn't fit within their "beliefs" then revoke the ability of the child to participate in such activities. We should not as a society allow our children to be raised by a corporation...

    1. Re:Quite tired... by bcreane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An excellent point, it is the responsibility of parents to educate kids about societal dangers. I wonder if all parents have the same resources - education, time, money, community - to draw from in the process of regulating their children. And if not, what role does the various institutions that intersect children's lives have to make up any institutional barriers to protecting those children? Neopets is a tempest in a teapot, I don't really mind it that much, though it is extremely addictive. What's more troublesome is the darwinian / libertarian perspective of "let them sink or swim" with respect to things that threaten the well-being of children.

  61. This is Totally Weird... by poena.dare · · Score: 1

    Last week my 9-year-old son gave away all his Neopets points. He said he did it because he wasn't going to play with it anymore.

    Egads! Could it be that my son knew about something before /. did?

  62. slashdot is my "pet" addiction by bcreane · · Score: 1

    god, so many addictions, so little time.

  63. Forgot about Pokemon already? by Maul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, it was the Pokemon trading card game.

    This game supposedly damaged our children in the following ways.

    1. It taught them gambling.
    2. It taught the theory of evolution.
    3. It introduced kids to evil occultism and Eastern Religions.
    4. It was a gateway game used by WOTC to lure kids into playing MTG and D&D.
    5. It opened our kids up to be mind controlled by the Japanese, who would use our kids as drones to bomb Pearl Harbor again.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    1. Re:Forgot about Pokemon already? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Pokemon "evolution" is a mistranslation. Caterpie becomes Metapod becomes Butterfree. It's metamorphosis.

    2. Re:Forgot about Pokemon already? by vhold · · Score: 1

      Yea I always liked to think that the far religious right should support Pokemon simply because it abused the term 'evolution' in such a way to make kids more likely to associate it with something fictional and ridiculous.

      Establishing that as a platform would've driven their opposition totally nuts, aaahh.. if only extremists actually thought outside the box..

  64. Drivel by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    The show is utter drivel. What frightens me is that everything else is moving down to its level (not that most TV content had far to fall). TV "news" is worse every year, we get "reality" TV now, etc.

    Given how bad even the sections of the media that at least pretend to have some form of integrity are, such as the papers, are, I decided several years back that I had better things to do than watch that drek. (Of course, this argument is somewhat undermined by being in the process of reading SlashDot, but anyway...).

    Even the ABC (different to USA; ABC is the gov't funded TV channel) news is pretty terrible these days.

    It seems that any form of depth, coverage of both sides of an issue, or even *gasp* admitting that there's no "right" answer is just forbidden by the TV media. Yay.

    One small point: If you're "disgusted with the crappy tv we have to put up with" it may be worth recognising that you do not, in fact, have to put up with it. You're perfectly free not to watch it.

    1. Re:Drivel by imroy · · Score: 1

      I tend to focus on ABC news and SBS news. Ten is barely acceptable, I mostly watch it because it's first at five. I tend to watch out for both technical and foreign issues to judge the different news services. SBS news is of course the best at the latter. Seven and especially Nine (nein!) are the worst in this catagory, at least from the little I've seen. Those stations both also have a lot of the cheap clip-style programs like America's/The worlds most dangerous/fastest/deadliest drivers/police-chases/snakes/sharks/animals. Nine especially seems to like the xenophobic angle with locally-made clip shows which seem to boil down to look at these whacky foreign television shows!.

      Back to the news, ABC and SBS seem to do about the same on technical issues. For example, I remember a few years back one of the shuttles in orbit was having trouble with a fuel cell. Both ABC and SBS straight-out called it a fuel cell, adding a quick explaination like "...which generates onboard power and drinkable water". When I caught the bulletins on the other stations (7, 9, 10) they all dumbed it down into a generator or some equally incorrect term (from a technical perspective). SBS has also been pretty good recently with the reporting of the various windows worm/virus outbreaks. They will often explicitly say that only windows machines are affected. This is probably mainly due to the resurgence of popularity in Apple Macs, but it also helps the image of other non-windows OS's.

      For me, my preference for news goes something like this:

      1. SBS (best all-round, esp. world events)
      2. ABC (a close second)
      3. Ten (barely acceptable, I usually only watch the first 20 minutes)
      4. Seven (rarely watch it)
      5. Nine (just say nein!)
  65. Obligatory Family Guy quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Peter: I should give ya some beer, it'll go right through you.
    Stewie: Oh good, then later we can roll a dubie and watch porn.
    Peter: Yeah?

  66. Re: Not yet a parent by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    Man, you have no idea...

    Live freely while you can. Get experiences to talk about because you are going to need every last one of them!

  67. Re:Very Unlikely Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sure have the site down pat. So it's your girl friend who's playing and not you right?

  68. Several types of real dragons by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
  69. There's a komodo in your commode-o by tepples · · Score: 1

    You were beaten to this question by about a minute. Anyway, if you think komodo dragons aren't real, it appears you need to sit on the commode-o and think about it for a while.

  70. Neopets is EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are connected to and run by Scientologists. A quick Google turned up this link and there's much more where that came from.

    I'm shocked that this connection isn't being shouted from the rooftops around here instead of the current crop of "What's the big deal?" comments that make up the bulk of the high rated comments.

  71. Re:Yep. It takes lots of time by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    What we *should* do is voice our concerns to Neopets. Or, I should say, parents should voice their concerns. If enough people object to the gambling aspect Neopets may remove it. Content providers who do not listen to the concerns of parents run the risk of going out of business.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  72. Hmmm, Better Gamblers! by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been reading Paul Graham's book, "Hackers and Painters", so let's take a different take on this. Here's an unthinkable thought, if indeed Neopets is introducing kids to gambling at an early age, then maybe they'll be better gamblers when they grow up! Afterall, the practical problem with gambling is being bad at it! My daughter loves Neopets, but since her computer is in my office, it's pretty easy to keep things under control. That's what parents are supposed to do, right? Still, if Neopets is making her a gambling genius, that could be pretty useful... ;-)

    Of more concern for our Aussie friends are the extremely paternalistic proposals and legislation coming from down under lately. It seems that every other story here on /. lately is about something being banned in Australia. What's going on down there?

    1. Re:Hmmm, Better Gamblers! by vhold · · Score: 1

      Unless of course the game is not a realistic representation of gambling, in which case it's potentially quite dangerous, if it gives the false security of actually being good when you are in fact a total sucker.

      I'd have to say overall for myself though, playing video game versions of house dominated games like slots, blackjack, and roulette is what taught me they are not a smart thing to play with real money. I don't know if weird abstractions and associations with junk like Neopets would have affected me differently.

      More generally though, being good at -skill- based games is what drives me away from -luck- based games. So video games that revolve around luck kind of disturb me.

  73. Neopets Scientology connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Do a Google search on "neopets scientology". Read some of the search results and decide for yourself.

  74. that's me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another anonymous neopettin' nerd. Funny thing is, I keep playing because it's not life-consuming like EverCrack. I can actually get somewhere in Neopets by playing only a few minutes a day, and get on with real life. Therefore, I haven't lost interest in it like I do most games.

    I recall a ./ article months ago about how there needs to be more games suitable for busy adults who don't have much time to spend on them. Ironic that a kid's site works for me. Maybe makers of MMORPGs can learn something, I'd pay for a game like this without the kiddy stuff and advertising.

  75. Not the first time they've been mentioned here by boysimple · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Way back when they tried to sue Neomail for the rights to the name Neomail, which they were using to brand their webmail service. The basis of their claim was that since they had 'thousands and thousands' of users, they had rights to the name.

    --
    My life is dedicated hosting
  76. Required gambling? No, not really by zaren · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "To "feed" their pets, Neopets players have to win points in a variety of mini-games, including versions of poker and blackjack."

    My 7 year old introduced me to neopets, and I quickly learned two things:

    1) Food that you have to pay for is really scarce, no matter how much money you have, and
    2) You don't need to BUY food.

    There's a section of the site where you can find "donations", and maybe someone dropped some food there. There's also a spot where you can get a free omelette once a day. After I discovered that, I don't have to spend an hour a day just trying to find food. I play a few games (btw, they have some really entertaining and addictive games there), make sure my critter's not dying of starvation, and I'm done.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:Required gambling? No, not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just found this discussion on a search (I'm not really an AC, I'm just lazy) and I've noticed one important point that seems to be missing from the entire discussion (at least from the base topic posts):

      YOU DON'T HAVE TO FEED THE NEOPETS. THEY DON'T DIE.

      I quit playing NeoPets in the middle of this year, after playing for almost a year intensively. Now and again I go back and see if my pets are ok, and they're fine. I never used to feed them when I was playing, unless I wanted to battle, which is the only situation you need a 'healthy' pet for.

      And then as pointed out, you can feed them up on free omelettes and jellies. There's no reason to buy food.

      Jessi

  77. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anybody ask to see this? Karma whore

  78. TodayTonight = Trash Journalism by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

    From my post in alt.games.neopets:

    "Whoever is doing the reporting/interviewing/editing for that lameass website should be fired for gross incompetence. How the heck does one make a bunch of BS assertions about Neopets and follow it up with snippets from adults supposedly countering the points made above with out-of-context comments that are as significant to the story as "I like yams" would be?"

    Shame on McDonald's for bowing to pressure generated by the ignorant and shoved upon the masses by those who should know better.

  79. The actual show TT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing to note is that the show is Today Tonight.

    Every night they show absolutely stupid stories which dont matter to anyone such as neighbours squabbling over a fence which they both claim to have lost 1 millimeter sq is yard space.

    Or whole neighbourhoods arguing over someones dog who smells.

  80. Gambling not all bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Parents fail to see that this gambling on Neopets might actually be beneficial to children. By exposing them to a tiny bit of gambling, they'll see there's nothing special to it, and won't become addicted to it later in life.

    Besides, if churches can hold "bingo" games (and other gambling games approved by God), why shouldn't Neopets?

  81. ugh by celeritas_2 · · Score: 1

    lets enact MORE laws to protect idiots from themselves. I personally, am fine with large groups of imbicilles with no money going to casinos and paying the 'stupid tax' so I don't have to. Evolution will eventually take over

    --
    -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
  82. Boring is as boring does... by MrBlackBand · · Score: 0
    I had exercises that I had to do with a textbook, pencil and pad of paper. It was boring...

    *snip*

    Nowadays, you need to have an educational game to make kids "learn". Tell me how this doesn't lead to kids getting bored from learning from an instruction book or during class?

    In "the good old days" (whenever you were young), learning bored you, but it was good. Nowadays these young whipper snappers get bored with learning and it's because of the Evil Games of Learning?

    I remember that the best teachers that I had actually taught me things, not had me just regurgitate what he or she was saying. They had fun and creative ways to challenge the class. The worst teachers I had just read out of a textbook. What exactly is wrong with making learning fun?

    --
    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
  83. Thanks. by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    I have my view today because my parents, well my father anyway, didn't have them. My introduction to the world was pretty ugly. Got through it ok, but almost didn't.

    Figured my kids ought to have better.

    Looks all blue sky right now. The older ones are now teenagers. I think they have it pretty rough these days. The next 10 years is going to be very interesting...

    Best of luck with your own.

  84. Parents need to make choices by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    These are bad trends because people are not making the right choices.

    New car, or sports fees? Fast food or cook at home. Premium television or broadband? Time off to do what you want or meet with the school people to discuss things. (This one is a biggie and will make a world of difference to your kids education.)

    I am having to make one of those choices right now in fact. Riding the IT wave of the 90's was a lot of fun. Now I need to figure out how to live cheaper, or give up some ability to keep the kids involved along with myself. Already did the used car and modest house thing. Maybe it't time for a move or career change.

    We could have nicer things, but we don't. I am not sure I would give up a winning sports season for any car.

    Will children always be prey to corps? Absolutely, unless parents do their part. Today it's pretty easy to just spend your money making life easy. The cost of doing so is high however.

    Those trends you speak of simply mean more folks are making poor choices.

    Companies are a problem however. Today they have the same rights as one of us, but don't have the disadvantages. That does need to change in order to put people on more solid ground.

    Waiting for this to happen because it's the right thing to do is a bad choice though. Kids only grow up once.

    1. Re:Parents need to make choices by russellh · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100% about choices. You say

      Those trends you speak of simply mean more folks are making poor choices.

      I have two kids, four and 17 months. In working with them we talk about setting them up for success. That means putting them in an enviroment or giving them the ability to make the right choices. Everyone needs it. The world we live in makes it increasingly difficult for people to make the right choices. It's still a choice, no doubt. But society isn't structured in a way that encourages responsible behavior.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
  85. Agreed. by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    If enough parents actually did provide Neopets with some feedback, things might change. I am not sure they need to however because enough parental involvement really diminishes the problem.

    Go ahead and mail them. Tell your friends to as well.

    Be sure and check the site out and decide for yourself before doing so however.

  86. Re:Sounds right. wouldn't want my kids learning th by BiggsTheCat · · Score: 1

    > /Sorry, but having an addictive game for kids to play poker and blackjack for more chips doesn't seem very educational to me./

    Actually, Neopets is far more than a casino. It's also a fully functioning economic simlation with commerce and stores, a bank with variable interest rates, and a stock market with mutual funds and corporations to invest in. It's a safe way to learn about and get a feel for real-world commerce without losing real money. No textbook can approximate that.

    > /I was astonished to see a 20-something kid playing his pocket Nintendo in the middle of a lecture/

    I hate that too! It'd be far better if he'd skip the lecture, as I and many of my friends did in school. Y'see, not everyone can learn from lectures (some do better from textbooks) and some profs just regurgitate the textbook, making the content of their lectures close to useless. Many students will skip these forms of lectures, but some profs will make a point of dropping one or two valuable sentences that are required knowledge for the test. It's these profs that end up with classes full of students playing Nintendo, or playing Solitare on their laptops or card games in the back of the class. I've been there.

    > /How will they possibly be able to learn to sit through a lecture/

    I have faith that if the lecture is useful, then they will sit through it. Really, no lecture should be "sat through", it should be "listened to". There is a difference.

    --

    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect

  87. What about you? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    You have more than 2000 more posts on /. then I do, and I have a 4 digit UID!

    FortKnox's Latest 24 of 6448 Comments
    DAldredge's Latest 24 of 4048 Comments

  88. Aaah.. not quite.. skill was involved by vhold · · Score: 1

    Unlike real slot machines, you could actually skillfully win that slot machine in Super Mario Bros 2 if you timed the presses right, in fact, and I sware to god on this, there was a certain setting on the Nes advantage turbo knob that could guarantee you 1ups -every- time if you just turned on turbo and held the button down.

    1. Re:Aaah.. not quite.. skill was involved by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      Ill second that. If you turned on turbo on an NES advantage and set it to it's lowest turbo setting and held the button in you got a 1up just about every time.

  89. I still kick their ass at most by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    video games too, though they are getting damn good. (It's not a shutout anymore.)

    It helps an awful lot to have been born right near the start of the whole video/computer thing.

    My favorites happens to be Tekken and SSX. One can get out a lot of frustration playing the former, nothing but pure fun, plenty of trash talk and attitude on the latter.

    The worst, for me, are the puzzlers. My days are numbered on those.

    The sick part is that a good win against the kids still feels damn good and I suppose it shouldn't. Their time will come though. We all get old, they will have younger fish to fry in due time.

  90. Re:Very Unlikely Story by TwistedTR · · Score: 1

    Cute, but after 3 years of watching someone waste time and wonder why, you pick things up along the way. I've been treated to far too many 'Today on neopets...' stories than I need to.

  91. Oh please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You weren't monitoring as closely as you think you were because all of your examples were obvious user exploits.

    Oh...and they've all since been corrected which shoots your ignorant, anti-corporate rant to hell.

  92. Maybe a moot point, but .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To "feed" their pets, Neopets players have to win points in a variety of mini-games, including versions of poker and blackjack.

    There's a soup kitchen where the poor can get free food. Also, neopets can't die of starvation (God knows I've tried!)

  93. Australia's fox news show by DMJC-L · · Score: 1

    Today tonight is utter crap, there's about as much journalism in today tonight as there is in the fox news network aka fuck all.

    1. Re:Australia's fox news show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, according to my cable TV bill, Fox News is Australia's Fox News.

      Channel 7's current affairs is designed for those who find Fox too intellectually demanding.

  94. Scary to think people actually take them seriously by Ravadill · · Score: 1

    Anyone who watches Today Tonight or A Current Afair, with the least bit of intelligence knows they are nothing more than trouble makers who almost always take the most controversial side of arguments just to generate viewing numbers and get people angry. The fact that major corporations (McDonalds) actually listen to them is really scary if you consider the amount of unprofessional journalism and general lack of any real understanding of the stories subjects they use every week.

  95. cutting edge journalism by mex666 · · Score: 1

    For those of you not lucky enough to get today tonight, get your cutting edge current affairs (and latest ufo sightings) from an equivalent US service here: www.nationalenquirer.com

  96. Neopets addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 2 friends were into Neopets...They spent at least 2 or 3 years into it. They had "hacks" for it, and scammed a bunch of people out of their fake online money. They now have a warning for people that do that, but they didnt get caught (they became friends with the creator of neopets. Yes-THAT addicted)

    They since stopped, but one of them now is obbsessed with Final Fantasy Online...From one addiction to another....sad.

  97. Lifetime fat ass instead by Magickcat · · Score: 1

    "she approached Today Tonight claiming McDonalds was setting her son up for a life of gambling addiction." Yeah, what a great parent - it's okay the give them a lifetime fat ass, but a big no to lifetime gambling. It might be worth mentioning to all those not from the great southern land, that Today Tonight is a pretty low brow show, that mainly revolves around inciting public outrage, however reasonable it may actually be to keep gambling from children.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

  98. In case... by T'hain+Esh+Kelch · · Score: 0

    ...Anyone wants to know: http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=thaine shkelch (I get free neopoints for you getting an account - Yay!) The easiest way to get neopoints without doing anything, is to use their stockmarket. You buy at 15 np/share, and sell at 20+ np/share. Easy, you dont do anything, earn a lot... :) Their stockmarket works like s***.... Totally random.

  99. Hang on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... don't all these US websites have protections already in place for children under 13?

  100. australian maccas worker by whatsup_will · · Score: 1

    we sell the toys, the toys are alright, but when the site that created them starts to be pulled down from 'gambleing games' that have been there for 4+ years, its strange how mcdonalds reacted to the 'today tonight' show, 1) the show is utter bull shit, all it is, is to make the flames bigger. 2) theres more than just 7 9 10 to watch, but as 'today tonight' is right after the news, most people think its real for some reason...

  101. OMG!!!1 The Monsters! by hayden · · Score: 1
    Marketing, buying and selling: Setting up a shop. How to make your shop stand out, what are people buying, how to take advantage of trends in the marketplace. Ripping people off and getting ripped off.

    How can they be allowed to teach young children to become marketing people?

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  102. don't you mean Barcelona Tonight? by roesti · · Score: 1
    Australians disillusioned by the mass media - which, really, should be all of us - still get the occasional bit of decent journalism. Seemingly, this always comes from ABC and SBS, our two government-owned broadcasters, who work much harder and are notably more neutral than the three commercial networks. For their hard work, they get regularly rewarded with budget cuts and investigations into anti-government bias.

    Fortunately, we still get Media Watch every Monday. It's arguably not quite the same since Stuart Littlemore QC stopped presenting the show, but it's still essential viewing. Their web site also has a streaming feed of each episode.

    What does this have to do with Today Tonight? A few years ago, Today Tonight reported that they attempted to interview Christopher Skase, a businessman who fled Australia for Mallorca in Spain, but could not even approach his house by car because of constant police barricades. A keen viewer, having recognised that they were actually driving around Barcelone, wrote to Media Watch, who then blew the story open. Those of us who had previously doubted Today Tonight's credibility, and found this irrefutable and rather hilarious proof, still refer to them as Barcelona Tonight.

  103. What!!! by Sam+Jackson · · Score: 1

    Well you got to teach them somehow??? A world full of gambling junkies is fine with me.

    --
    --- hows it taste mother f$#@er!!!
  104. Today Tonight Current Affairs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today Tonight is nothing but a half hour of paid advertising obfusicated as scientific reports, "what will kill you today" stories, and of course the always popular, "conmen dupe dumb people, lets fell sorry for them" stories.

  105. ok and..? by pyro17 · · Score: 1

    Not to be rude here but...
    Your child was caught playing an online moneyless simplified version of a game that you can gamble at. Hey i bet you could gamble at those games of "life" or even racing those fisher Price racecars. Im totaly going freak out and try to shut down some site or company(or at least try to hurt it). I used to have a neopet account and such. I played for maybee a week, grew board, and stopped. Just like that. If a child is going to get a gambling problem this way, he/she probally was going to have it anyway; why not find out about it now?

  106. Re:Sounds right. wouldn't want my kids learning th by The+FooMiester · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit younger than you, but I remember learning to do addition when I was 3.

    My grandfather taught me.

    He taught me by teaching me how to play blackjack.

    --
    The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
  107. Dragon is an official term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word "dragon" refers to species of lizards that walk with their bodies raised from the ground (repites that drag their bodies, like crocodiles, are classified as skinks).

    Australia has numerous species of dragon icluding the water dragon, the bearded dragon, the frill-neck, the thorny devil, and the goanna (as are all of the monitor family). Many other countries have dragons, possibly the most famous being the Komodo dragon of Indonesia, not Japan as other posts have claimed, a creature with such poor dental hygene that its bite is lethal due to secondary infection rather than poison (the only species worse is the British).

    Disclaimer: I am not in any way affiliated with that idiot Steve Irwin (I like all my limbs right where they are).

  108. Mod parent up by mbstone · · Score: 1

    The ticket arcade games at Chuck E. Cheese, Boomers, etc., yes, they are gambling. They have Wheel of Fortune stop-the-blinking light machines, just as they have Wheel of Fortune slot machines in casinos. And the kiddie casinos have Flip-It, identical to the casino game (a big pile of quarters/tokens looks like it is about to fall over the edge into the win slot, but adding your quarter/token to the pile won't cause the avalanche you expected) -- except in the kiddie version wins are paid in tickets.

  109. Dying Pets by dexterpexter · · Score: 1

    Pets in the game cannot die. If you do not feed them, they will reach a level called "Dying," but they do not ever actually die.

    You may have up to four pets per account.

    --

    *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
    "We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms."
    1. Re:Dying Pets by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause gods forbid we expose the little ankle-biters to anything UNPLEASANT, like death[0].

      Won't someone think of the Children? "FUCK the Children" - G. Carlin.

      [0]Only unpleasant when its NOT one of those "fuck with other peoples' lives" types mentioned above. In those cases, it's happy fun time!

  110. Re:Sounds right. wouldn't want my kids learning th by cortez · · Score: 1

    You were in my marketing class?

    Seriously, I used to play Tony Hawk on GBA every friggin class. Me and my bud would switch off to see who got the high score.

    Still got an A. I realized by the first exam that I wasn't going to need to pay attention to class since I couldn't read what was on the projector and could barely hear him in the back of the auditorium and STILL got a 100%. Only reason I went to class was for the hot future marketroidettes and the pop quizzes :P

    --
    Paizurishitetai desu ka?
  111. Neopets is a comprehensive money management sim by AscendantOat · · Score: 2

    Neopets teaches far better money management than Monopoly, Life, and similar games.

    Neopets has an extensive market simulation, with over 10,000 discrete items available. There are many shops with virtual vendors, each specializing in a particular category of item. They have limited inventory, sales for special days, and you can even haggle with the vendors to try and get a lower price.
    In addition, players can set up their own shop and resell their items at a profit. Realistically, larger inventories require purchasing larger shops. There's also a trading post, which allows for more complex exchanges between players.

    Neopets has a job system, where you can employ your pets. Successfully completing jobs adds work experience to that pet's resume, and allows your pet to take on more difficult and financially rewarding jobs.

    Neopets has a business management mini-game. Different materials are available to manufacture products out of, each of a different quality and price level. The cost of workers and managers varies according to their experience and college degrees. After production, there's store quality, making sure supply meets demand , and advertising to manage.

    Neopets has a bank with savings plans. Like real banks, you get higher interest rates if you have more money in the account. Also like real banks, it can take a very long time to get your return to nontrivial levels. Keeping your money in the bank protects it from robbery and inflation.

    Neopets has a miniature stock market, with 41 virtual companies trading as of the time of this writing. The stock market has quite a few features of the real stock market: companies have ticker symbols, there's a "Neodaq" index, companies can and do go bankrupt. It even has broker fees.

    In short, Neopets is one of the most brilliant and comprehensive money management simulations available to the general public.