Slashdot Mirror


India Debating Manned Space Flight

alphakappa writes "India's moon mission and other space programs have been covered before on Slashdot. India is now debating sending a manned space mission and has acknowledged it's technological preparedness to do so in the next 6-7 years if given the go-ahead. The issues being debated before starting work on the mission include cost-benefit and other space priorities. (These missions also play host to international experiments) What does the general slashdot crowd think of these space plans?"

406 comments

  1. Does Anyone else have this image. by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    With Hundreds of Indians attached to the spacecraft in anyways they can fit in hanging off the edges blasing into space?

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take it easy. If you saw the above joke visualized on the Simpsons or Family Guy you know you'd laugh. Funniest FP I've seen.

    2. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by 320mb · · Score: 0

      I'll wager if/when India tries to send any spacecraft up that Pakistan will shoot it down..........this will start a big War........

      --
      === 'Kernel Panic' no sig found:
    3. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow it looks like I crossed the line in this post and I apologize. Yes I know that India can and will have formal Space Program, with nothing funny about it. But to most Americans the way that some areas of highly populated sections India and how the people deal with public transportation. Seems very crazy to us. But I am sure for other people the fact that every person has a Gas Guzzling SUV that can cross the Rocky Mountants off road is just as if not more exsessive and seems crazy.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's already a Pakistani Star Wars program to shoot down Indian missiles. But it seems to rely heavily on Western technology.

    5. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by skink1100 · · Score: 1

      Oh, c'mon! That WAS funny. Don't let the PC police get you down.

      S

    6. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      ...unless they invite them over... THAT would give "one day international" a wholly new meaning!!

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    7. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by Object · · Score: 2, Informative

      he he dont worry mate..I am indian and found the thought absolutely funny :)

    8. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by sandeep_babel · · Score: 1

      dont know why you americans think u have all the intelligence in the world.. agreed u are a superpower.. but u r a nation of fucking immigrants relying on the technological geniuses offered to you by countries like India and China... take the number of indians and chinese out of america today and see whats left of the once all might silicon valley.. and to get the statistics straight... 30 % of employees in intel, and microsoft are indians.. and what else.. the head of the rover and spirit mission to mars was an indian too... i think everyone should be given a fair chance to progress.. and i dont understand why americans have to mock the indians or feel jealous about it... since they have already acheived it...

    9. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by Orthogonal+Jones · · Score: 1


      Apology accepted, if not successfully parsed. And by the way, I doubt this is an American. But I'm just judging the "Engrish"...

    10. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      AOL user or just too damn lazy to type correctly?

      Must be an American...

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    11. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Finally something that made me post my views to ./ For starters, I am an Indian living in the US.

      First, I should salute the original poster for having the heart to come back & apologize for his/her condescending remark. I have seen many dish out belittling comments like that in the past about India & have abosoultely no remorse whatsoever.

      This captures the gist of one of biggest lessons I have learnt after coming to this country. Humans, operate on stereotypes a lot more than they think they do. Where else will I learn this other than from living in the melting pot of world cultures, United States.

      The problem with the stereotypes is that they don't justify reality. For example, before I came here, I thought of America as Utopia. Everyone is happy, educated, smart & has decent living conditions. I was shocked to learn that double digits percentage of the population was illiterate & lived below poverty line. I was also shocked to see how religiously conservative this country is.

      Similarly, India is not full of cows & half-naked people & diseases. Overpopulation is India's biggest problem & it infact amazes me how much we have accomplished 'in spite of' the problems it faces. I am not going to go in to the boastful mode. I am sure you have heard or will hear about it.

      In terms of the humor, lets face it, everyone deserves to have their personal opinion on things. But, the context in which you share it with others is important. A world renowned place like Slashdot is definitely not the context. Take Brit golfer Paul Casey's comments on America for that matter. He said, "Americans are stupid" to some British press two days ago. His sponsor Titelist pulled out of the contract right away & many American golfers condemned his remark. Could we expect Americans to say, "Oh, cummon, that is his personal opinion. Lets move on". No, of course they will be aggravated. Because, they know not ALL americans are stupid. The same way, not ALL Indians are grazing cows.

      For those who brought up Pakistan, glad you did. I will not be surprised if India offered a seat for Pakistan in its mission. We are brothers and sisters after all & you will be surprised how many friendship gestures are shared by the us.

      To summarize,

      "Let noble come to us from all sides"
      -Rig Veda (3000+ years old Indian scripture)

    12. Re:Does Anyone else have this image. by rsidd · · Score: 1

      Actually I found your post genuinely funny (and I'm from India). What I don't find funny is the incessant "why have a space program when you've got all those poor people" twerps.

  2. not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why does it interest us? Because it is India? What about China, Canadian and other groups wanting to go to space?

    Iraq wanting to go to space? That would be interesting.

    1. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because the government can outsouce it launches to save money.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by shishu · · Score: 1

      It is of interest because it involves developing space vehicles on a limited budget.
      China's space programme is also of interest for the same reason.
      If Iraq had a space programme that would be interesting too ... but that would let Bush proclaim that he's finally found that elusive WMD program.

    3. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by davesplace1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The more the merrier, there is plenty of room in space for everyone.

    4. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by metlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      why does it interest us? Because it is India? What about China, Canadian and other groups wanting to go to space?

      Because developing and third-world nations are making huge strides in progress. The US accomplished this over 35 years ago, but that really does not mean much because they've competition from what were unlikely competitors, until a few years ago.

      It shows that as a civilization we are progressing and moving forward - technology is not as much of a niche as it once was. What one country could achieve after putting in so much of time and effort has now been made a little easier and a little common place.

      That is why this is important. That said, I'm quite certain that if NASA was to launch a manned mission, Slashdot would cover that too.

    5. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the countries you mentioned do get play on slashdot .. do a search yourself

      look up canadian Arrow or the recent China space stuff.

      I'm not going to do the search for you

    6. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Iraqi space efforts would be NASA via Halliburton for 150% of what NASA would charge.

      The country that would get some real attention would be an Iranian Space Program. The ability to put a nuke into New York City from Terhan by air delivery would certainly wake up the U.S. government. That is precisely why Sputnik was taken so seriously back in the 1950's.

    7. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by b-baggins · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      We have found Iraq's WMD program. It was extensive. It was idled pending lifting of the sanctions. What we did not find were large quantities of WMD. According to liberals, Sarin gas is not a WMD find unless it can kill more than 40,000 people, so the Sarin we have found doesn't qualify.

      Also, according to liberals, Iraq's massive stockpiling of chemical warfare suits was just the popular Iraqi army fashion at the time of the invasion.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    8. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by supabeast! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because India going to space would start a space race in Asia. China would speed up its own space program to try and prove that they can beat the Indians. Pakistan would start a space program out of contempt for India. All three nations will gain advanced rocket engine technology that will be used by their militaries to enhance nuclear weapon delivery.

      Doing all of this will provide these nations with plenty of cool technology and a lot of capable engineers. At that point the US Government would have no choice but to join in the space race or risk losing what little edge it has left over Asia in that area. This will spur EU nations to start pushing their space programs so that they can at least stay in the game.

      At this point the worlds economic powerhouses would all be engaged in cool space missions. With people of very different cultures approaching the problems related in getting people to space and back alive, there will be all sorts of different solutions produced.But without a cold war in the way this time, many of the technologies and personnel produced can be shared, allowing everyone involved to do it better and faster. And with everyone working together, maybe nations would be less likely to drop out.

      A new space race would be a huge step forward in the scientific evolution of mankind and I can't wait!

    9. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by kryonD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The parent's post may have been moderated to Funny, but there is a bit of truth there.

      India certainly has the developing economy and technical know how to get there, but I seriously doubt they would spend a lot of money reinventing the wheel. They will indeed outsource consulting at the very least and most likely will add some custom component manufacturing to that as well. This is great news for us because as more money flows into established companies on these programs, we will actually see innovation in the field that results in a lower cost to Joe Citizen.

      Now if they decide to hold some kind of misplaced national pride (Anyone else notice the "Made in the USA" rhetoric died down after the economy tanked in 2000?) and develop Appolo era technology in country, then there's nothing really interresting there.

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    10. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by vk2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Read this and come back and tell me where did US find the WMD. Program is just an intent and not actual weapons.

      If weapons were the central issue - why the Bush gov is not invading North Korea - where its believed they have the weapons material and means to parcel it near the US.

      Accept it - this WAR was just for oil and nothing else.

      --
      No Sig for you.!
    11. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Or Pakistan (who surprisingly are our allies!)

    12. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by chris+mazuc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We have found Iraq's WMD program. It was extensive. It was idled...

      It was, as you say, "idling", NOT AN IMMINENT THREAT!

      I find it interesting that lots of people forget about this:
      From Wikipedia (this article)... "In particular, the United States, along with its allies (among them Britain, France and Italy), provided Iraq with biological and chemical weapons and the precursors to nuclear capabilities." (emphasis mine)

      Saddam makes pond scum seem worthy of the papal robes, but we cannot forget the history that created this situation in the first place. Maybe you should forget about this "liberal" and "conservative" bullshit and learn to think for yourself.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    13. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Anyone ever note that space shots are only really pressing in nations that want to prove they have ICBM capability?

    14. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Problem is we didn't find anything specifically outlined by the Conservative hardline and in particular outlined by Powell at his UN speach. And yes, that includes quantities of Sarin. Finding a few dozen canisters isn't the hundreds of tons outlined by Powell and the Bush administration.

    15. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prolly a little bird told him he was going to be occupied for their natural resources.

      if he had WMDs, its pretty obvious he would have used it in the first place.

      why do you think we cant enforce our ideologies onto China and North Korea, Oh thats right, they have nukes.

    16. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by b-baggins · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      ===
      It was, as you say, "idling", NOT AN IMMINENT THREAT!
      ===

      Exactly. Are you trying to make a point? Bush made it very clear he wanted to take Iraq out BEFORE they became an imminent threat. Which part of his State of the Union speech where he explicitly said that did you not understand?

      Wikipedia is probably the most unreliable source for information you can find. Try looking something up in a reputable source, instead.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    17. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to spot a conservative? When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

    18. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is already way ahead of India in the space race you delusional fool. They have put a man in space. Indians are only full of hot air.

      Why dont you idiots put your mediocre engineers to work designing a sewage system first? Dont you get disgusted seeing all those people crapping in the streets?

    19. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Want to spot a liberal? The problem is a nail, and they still want to try using a screwdriver.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    20. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      The Cold War was a lot of the driving force behind our dedication to the space race. The country that could get things into space fastest and develop the best rockets would be in a place to best fight a nuclear war. If we hadn't eventually planned to put spy cameras and nuclear weapons on them, a lot of our space tech wouldn't have been developed. 'Keeping up with the Joneses' isn't a reason inof itself.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    21. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by joeyGibson · · Score: 1

      Accept it - this WAR was just for oil and nothing else.

      Oh! Stop! Please! You're killing me! That's the funniest thing I've heard in quite a while. Are you really so amazingly stupid to believe that? Or are you just a Democrat myrmidon repeating the talking points you've been fed? If this war was "just for oil" then why the hell am I still paying $1.71 for a bloody gallon of gas? Our gas prices should be down around 0.65 per gallon by now if you're correct.

    22. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by banzai51 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Please outline again how IRAQ had anything to do with 9/11? Oh wait, you can't. But yet another incompetent conservative that won't let the actual facts of a situation guide his actions. The cognitive dissonance of the right is nothing short of sad.

    23. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you call millions of people starving, while a government funds a program to do something that has been done and wont offer any particular scientific advancements [another among many such squanderings] part of a beautiful global civilization.

      perhaps we should try to read this with our minds out of the clouds?

    24. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to spot an idiot? He dismisses his opponents with an insulting analogy. ('Cause that's so very useful)

    25. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      "'Keeping up with the Joneses' isn't a reason inof itself."

      It is when those who do not keep up risk economic obscurity. At the time of the original space race, very few people realized what an economic boon it would be for the USA -- and would have been to the Soviets, had they not been socialists working toward communism -- however now people realize the value of competing in a space race. With China, the EU, and India fighting to become economic superpowers and the USA fighting to remain an economic superpower, any nation not joining in risks falling too far behind to ever catch up. That's a damned compelling reason to get to work in space.

    26. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Atryn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sigh...
      Bush is incompetent for not preventing 9/11.
      Both Bush and Clinton could have and perhaps should have done more to combat and intercept AQ operatives and plans.
      Bush is a warmonger for trying to prevent another 9/11 from Iraq.
      9/11 did not occur at the hands of a sovereign nation and no invading of a sovereing nation and overthrowing of its government likely would have prevented it. We needed better field intelligence and operatives within the AQ network which was known to exist for several presidencies. If you notice, even the invasion and overthrow in Afghanistan has not "stopped" AQ.
      Bush is incompetent for not dealing unilaterally with North Korea.
      True, he is incompetent for not dealing unilaterally with NK. That is not to say INSTEAD OF multilaterally, but in addition to. Bush is famous for NOT pursuing all avenues available to him.
      Bush is incompetent for dealing unilaterally with Iraq.
      No, Bush is incompetent because he dealt unilateraly with Iraq militarily. Dealing with them unilaterally (as in sanctions) is a valid foreign policy at times. Military action (sanctioned by the UN) is also a valid policy at times. Unilateral Military action is NOT a valid policy.
      Bush is incompetent for not invading Iran to stop their nuclear program.
      Ack! No liberal I know wants Bush to unilaterally invade Iran either! I think the closest statement to this has been that if one were to pick the "more likely to be pursuing WMD (esp. nuclear weapons)" then Iran would have made more sense than Iraq by about 100x. That's a citation of inconsistency, not a policy suggestion.
      Bush is incompetent for invading Iraq to stop their nuclear program.
      See above. Also, Bush is incompetent for setting a precedent that violation of another nation's sovereignty without the support of the international community on the grounds of poorly verified intelligence is a "good thing"(tm).
      Want to spot a liberal? Look for the guy pressing his hands against his temples trying to keep his head from exploding from all the contradictions he's shoving into his brain.
      Want to spot a conservative? Look for the guy who cannot (and really doesn't have an interest in) understanding other people's views.
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    27. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by tomjennings · · Score: 1

      Well duh, because *humans* going to space is interesting. Though likely their food will be better.

    28. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, didn't Iraq plan to use one of its superguns to shoot an object into Earth orbit?

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    29. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Want to spot a bigger idiot? He posts AC.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    30. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by susano_otter · · Score: 1
      Interesting points, all, but this one struck me most forcefully:

      True, he is incompetent for not dealing unilaterally with NK. That is not to say INSTEAD OF multilaterally, but in addition to.

      How would that work? Would Bush say one thing to Kim Jong Il in the private unilateral meetings, and another thing in the multilateral meetings? Which talks--the unilateral or the multilateral--would take precedence? How would China react, if it was pressured to participate in multilateral talks, while at the same time it knew that the U.S. was making a seperate deal with North Korea on the side?

      And keep in mind that in North Korea, China has a neighbor with nuclear weapons, a failed economy, a madman for a ruler, and a starving, brainwashed, and desperate populace. What are the chances of China continuing to ignore this problem and blame the U.S. for every setback, so long as the U.S. is engaged in unilateral negotiations?

      Indeed, under what possible scenario would we even want to cut off North Korea's neighbors from the peace process? It's to China's everlasting shame, and the shame of South Korea, Japan, and others in the region, that the U.S. has to take the lead on this at all.

      Finally, let's not forget what happened the last time the U.S. tried unilateral negotiations with North Korea. After explaining just how incompetent Bush really is, how are you going to convince me that he's also a better negotiator than Bill Clinton? I should think you'd prefer China handled this one, really.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    31. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      And in fact, the whole and entire point of a space program imo. It's *space*, and plenty of it -- complete with all the resources in the universe and all the elbow room you need to fulfil anyone's perception of Manifest Destiny.

      Bugger this fighting your brother stuff for a lark.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    32. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by citog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That doesn't prove your point or accurately rebut the grandparent post. You assume that a war for oil would be fought in the interest of the American people; the average citizen like you. I suppose you think that the 'war on terrorism' is for your safety and not a messy cleanup from bygone days coupled with 'defending' the national interests abroad?

    33. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      Why is this modded funny, are americans in denial about this subject ? The government already DOES outsource it's manned launches, and it's going to continue to do so for a considerable timeframe.

      The beaurocrats at nasa love this setup. They keep thier multi billion dollar budget on the guise of 'return to flight' for the shuttle,a nd in the meantime, they have zero risk of vehicle failures. You can bet your last dollar, every manager at nasa will be kicking and screaming to keep the shuttle grounded till they cant kick and scream anymore. It's the bearocrats dream come true, a billion dollar budget to manage, thousands of underlings, and the whole organization doesn't have to actually do anything except produce reports on why they cant actually do anything. The Nasa shuttle program is the most fertile ground for grooming PHB types in the world.

    34. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by rsidd · · Score: 1
      The parent's post may have been moderated to Funny, but there is a bit of truth there.

      There's a lot of truth but not in the way you say. India is already making money from satellite launches, undercutting the Europeans and Americans in cost. There could be a lot of money in manned space flight in the future.

    35. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever considered that maybe its supposed to make the rich richer and naive people like you a bit poorer than before.

      Btw did u vote for Bush for his moral values!!!

    36. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by joeyGibson · · Score: 1

      The war on terror is, in effect, a "cleanup from bygone days" in that for 8 years Bill Clinton spent his time getting blowjobs from chubby interns in the Oval Office instead of protecting the country. So yes, you are correct, in that respect, though I would bet you didn't realize it.

    37. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Atryn · · Score: 1
      Indeed, under what possible scenario would we even want to cut off North Korea's neighbors from the peace process?
      Read my post again I guess... I said in addition to. I would not suggest the US hold unilateral talks without multilateral talks as well. Yes, multilateral talks should take precedence. But anytime you wait to get 4-5 parties together before discussion can begin the process is greatly slowed. And in a race against nuclear weapons development, we cannot afford that slowdown.

      The US should not be afraid to talk with NK directly, on the side, and to bring the results of such unilateral discussions to the multilateral meetings as appropriate.
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    38. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Yes, but why? Why the U.S.? South Korea shares a language, a culture, and an extensive network of family ties with North Korea, why shouldn't they take the lead in brokering an agreement? China is the most powerful nation in the region, and North Korea is a much more immediate problem to China than to the U.S., no matter how you figure it. Why shouldn't China take the lead? And--again--given America's past failures to broker a sincere agreement with North Korea, why should China, South Korea, or any of the other powers in the region trust the U.S. as North Korea's proxy? Why would the U.S. want the responsibility? And why, again, do you think that Bush is the man best qualified to negotiate with North Korea, when you've already explained in detail how incompetent he is, and when Bill Clinton has already demonstrated that even allegedly skilled American negotiators are incompetent where North Korea is concerned? Finally, on another note, what makes you think there's even something to negotiate here?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    39. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by Atryn · · Score: 1
      Again you are taking my comments out of context and making assumptions. I have never stated that the US should "take the lead", only that we should not rule out unilateral discussions as a potential avenue toward progress. There is no reason whay China, Japan, South Korea, etc. could not ALSO have unilateral discussions with NK if they saw fit (and you insist it is of the utmost concern to them).
      Why would the U.S. want the responsibility?
      Presumably we have aims at nuclear non-proliferation, maintaining our military superiority, maintaining a status-quo stability in the region, etc. Certainly if NK launched a nuke at Japan it would be a major upset to one of our largest trading partners (who, BTW, has little military and recent military experience to retaliate, so we would most likely be directly involved).
      Finally, on another note, what makes you think there's even something to negotiate here?
      Blind optimism? ;) Yes, there is still a part of me that refuses to believe NK's leadership has only ill-intentions.
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    40. Re:not trying to be flamebait but by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      These are good reasons why the U.S. would want to be involved--and it is involved, very much so--but not necessarily responsible. In fact, given what happened the last time the U.S. took responsibility for negotations with North Korea, we ended up in the mess we're in now. And that mess was only exacerbated by the willingness of the regional powers to let the U.S. do all the work, and take all the blame when North Korea didn't play fair. Indeed, there seems to be a tendency amongst the regional powers to pass the buck early and often, when it comes to North Korea. It seems clear to me that the current U.S. policy is based on the assumption that unilateral talks with NK don't work. This assumption is borne out by recent history. Thus, the preferable course of action would be to establish a negotiating framework that forced the regional powers to accept some responsibility, for the stability of the region, and hold them jointly accountable for the outcome of the negotiations. This probably would not happen so long as there were unilateral negotiations in progress. And you still haven't explained the contradiction implied at the beginning of this thread, between Bush the Incompetent and Bush The Only Man Who Can Negotiate Peace With North Korea.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  3. In other news... NASA outsourced by scorp1us · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sure our own government will decide that we should outsource NASA to india because it's cheaper. Forget american jobs and pride, this is the all mighty dollar.

    I vote that we outsource the government to India.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:In other news... NASA outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Go to a Nasa facility sometime-this is already _happening_-there are _lots_ of Indians that work at Nasa.


      I see lots of Americans that want to see space happen-however, I don't see many that see what Nasa is doing as getting humanity or America into space. That is the problem.

    2. Re:In other news... NASA outsourced by JeffTL · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not outsourcing; that's the hiring of immigrants. Outsourcing would be if the NASA facilities themselves were located in India, and the staff were paid in rubles.

    3. Re:In other news... NASA outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's rupees, not rubles.

    4. Re:In other news... NASA outsourced by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      " Go to a Nasa facility sometime-this is already _happening_-there are _lots_ of Indians that work at Nasa."

      Such as one of the crew of the Columbia.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
  4. Outsourcing dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Excellent. Now Nasa will have someone they can outsource to who will lose less spacecraft and personnel.

  5. Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 0

    I would almost expect a similar competitive announcement from Pakistan in the next few days and a debate over a launch site in Kashmir. In other news NASA has planned to outsource its scientists from India due to cheaper labor costs!

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    1. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Comparing India and Pakistan is inappropriate. India is the world's largest secular democracy, with a healthy mix of various ethnicities and the like, with over a billion people. Pakistan is relatively smaller, and is an Islamic fundamentalist dictatorship with a military general.

      While India's technological developments are said to be largely inhouse (they had a little help from Russia in the 1980s, but Russia had to stop helping them after pressure from the US), Pakistan's technologies are largely borrowed from China.

      There is a big difference. India is a progressive economy with a very liberal-minded population, you can be fairly certain that they won't blow up anyone first. Pakistan is a conservative Islamic nation with a military ruler, you never know how they would react.

      I've interacted with several Indians - but for the cultural "oddities" they are excellent people.

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
    2. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I agree with the overarching point that I believe politically Pakistan has the potential to be a bit more of a powder-keg than India, but both countries have both inherently good and bad practices. India for example (if I remember correctly, which is often not the case) was spotlighted for numerous accepted Acid-burn attacks on women from Indian men because of marriage issues (basically very young girls not wanting to marry older men so the older men would throw acid on them scarring them for life.)

      --
      News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    3. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by mean+pun · · Score: 1
      I've interacted with several Indians - but for the cultural "oddities" they are excellent people.

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush! Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.

      Whereas, americans have no cultural oddities at all! No sirree. None. And as rational as a Vulcan.

    4. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 1

      The sig is sarcastic and designed to shock. See this thread.

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
    5. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geosynchronous orbit can be only over equator you dumbass.

    6. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by william_w_bush · · Score: 1, Informative

      I would almost agree with you, but not quite.

      Southern India, coastal regions, urban areas, you'll find well-educated, secular people who share most of the same values we do. North India, more rural and remote areas are in fact far more religious and conservative. Those lovely scenes on CNN where Indians were rioting and butchering Muslims and celebrating? Thats the general kind of mentality I'm talking about. Honor killings, forced marriages, old-fashioned intolerance. This is changing, but religious and tribal authority still overrides national authority in much of the North.

      There have been 3 wars with Pakistan for a reason, everyone there isn't as peace-loving as you seem to think.

      My family is South Indian, and overall while they are prejudiced against northerners I try not to share that, but I have noticed differences between the Indians I grew up with here and others I've met. Just like there are red and blue states but one US, there are different levels of education and beliefs in India.

      Just trying to give you a better picture of what the country is like.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
    7. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by nmk · · Score: 0

      >>There is a big difference. India is a progressive economy with a very liberal-minded population, you can be fairly certain that they won't blow up anyone first. Pakistan is a conservative Islamic nation with a military ruler, you never know how they would react.

      Really. Please tell me how this is any different from the United States. The United States has now become a conservative (extremist perhaps) Christian nation with a Christian fundamentalist ruler. Believe me when I tell you, the world does NOT know, or feel very comfortable about, how your government will react next.

    8. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

      Yes you are right. Geosynchronous/Geostationary can only be over/near the Equator, but I was referring to the footprint and not the vehicle itself. Should have made it clearer so the flamelords wouldn't have an opportunity to vent.

      --
      News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    9. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by AnnaSaru · · Score: 1


      Axiom 1: Urban communities will be liberal and rural ones will be conservative, comparatively.
      Axiom 2: Communities that send more people into the armed forces/war (per capita) will be more conservative, comparatively.
      I think the above 2 axioms can be applied to almost any country in the world.

    10. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2

      I tend to agree with you ... the current controversy over H1Bs, outsourcing and all that aside, I've worked with a number of Indian engineers and found them, to a man, to be competent, hardworking and ethical. And, alas ... relatively inexpensive. But that will change for India and China as it did with Japan. People (particularly cultured, educated, talented people with families) will work for peanuts for only so long.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

      Comparing India and Pakistan is inappropriate.

      I agree. They are different people with different traditions and values, although they hail from the same backgrounds.

      India is the world's largest secular democracy, with a healthy mix of various ethnicities and the like, with over a billion people.

      Well depends on your definition of democracy. Just saying it isnt enough. I agree they have a various mix of of ethnicities but have problems in each one of those. Whether its Hindu-Muslim riots in Gujrat, or Tamil guerrilas in the South and others.

      Pakistan is relatively smaller, and is an Islamic fundamentalist dictatorship with a military general.

      I feel the current rule in Pakistan is the most democratic and modern government for some time. The freedom of press and media is at a level almost at par with any of that in the world and definitely better than here. Fundamentalists? Well is that why they have captured more fundamentalist AQ/Taliban operatives than the US forces there?

      I've interacted with several Indians - but for the cultural "oddities" they are excellent people.

      I dont think there is any real difference between Indians and Pakistanis who are in US. I am sure you will find proportionately equal representation of both in all accomplishments here. But its true that Indians have a head-start as far as technology is concerned but thats not surprising.

    12. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Precisely. It's already happening. Wish I had mod points left :)

      "Those who don't understand history...

      Cheers,
      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    13. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You're joking, of course. America is not an extremist Christian nation with a fundamentalist ruler. Our "elected President" is about as fundamentalist as a doorknob, and given the number of Americans that basically disagree with him your comment is just completely way off base. He got re-elected, yes, but only because the opposition proved incapable of supplying us an even equally-tolerable option. Had Kerry actually been a better choice Bush would have been out: this may come as a surprise to you but we're not any happier about Iraq than you are. You may not live in a Republic, where you have a choice of leaders, but for us it came down to the (barely) lesser of two evils. And in four years he's out, for good.

      I'm not a religious person myself, but I can honestly say that a lot of America's problems with moral decay, high crime rates, high divorce rates, and so forth have more to do with a lack of organized religion than an excess. Hell, there are more religions in the U.S. than you can count on all twenty-one extremities and none of them get along with each other. Portraying us as some monolithic, intolerant, Fundamentalist/military regime such as the Taliban or Pakistan is just, well, ignorant. Sorry.

      I don't know what country you hail from (don't much care either) but I will tell you this: I look at the world today, and there are many, many nations that I, as an American, don't feel comfortable with because they have a proven track record of unpredictable, dangerous behavior. Laying all the crap this so-called "civilization" dishes out at the feet of the United States is an abdication of responsibility ... clean up your own messes.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    14. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by biophysics · · Score: 1
      Well depends on your definition of democracy. Just saying it isnt enough. I agree they have a various mix of of ethnicities but have problems in each one of those. Whether its Hindu-Muslim riots in Gujrat, or Tamil guerrilas in the South and others.

      With a population of 1 billion how many you think took part in the violence. Had India not been secular, democratic and tolerant the whole of the country must be in chaos. Just because the numbers are huge (in any riot) does not effectively mean the intensity of the problem. The per cent of people who did the violence is fractional. Even less % than the % of misbehaved soldiers of Abu Gharib.

      And by the way the Tamil guerrilas are in a different country called Sri Lanka.

      I feel the current rule in Pakistan is the most democratic and modern government for some time.

      Yes, as you said above "it depends on the definition of democracy". But it is not the democracy "by,for, to the people".

      Fundamentalists? Well is that why they have captured more fundamentalist AQ/Taliban operatives than the US forces there?

      This is because 'the current regime' was the creator sponsor of Taliban and they know the territory and the AQ members. One must remember Pakistan was the last country to maintain ties with the Taliban.

    15. Re:Geosynchronous Orbit Over Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, How many years have you spent in north India. zilch I guess, tambee.

  6. Go for it by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There a few imbalances in the world that need to be sorted out and space is one of them. The more the merrier.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Go for it by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Investment in technologies that will create more opportunities and bring progress is never a bad thing.

      If we were to wait until everyone in the world had their basic needs covered, progress in other areas would never happen.

      Progress happens in many ways, you cannot see that it is at the "expense" of anything else. And as a species, we've always sought to do things that motivates us.

      Space, Computers and the like are motivating India now, and they are taking great strides in these areas. Which is as it should be.

      A few years from now, these will create jobs (see, the IT industry has already created jobs there) and will raise the standard of living. This will bring in more revenue and help the people lead better lives.

      It's always a circle, and the solution is not stagnation in progress.

    2. Re:Go for it by centauri · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Insightful? More like redundant. This argument comes up everytime there's an article about space exploration. It might carry some weight except for the fact that it's just too convenient. There can ALWAYS be some problem that a segment of the population considers to be more worthwhile than human spaceflight, and there probably always will be, even as we're looking the next earth-bound comet or asteroid in the eye. Get over it already.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    3. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why go over the hill to look at the next valley? It seems like such a waste, after all, the people in this cave need help now.

    4. Re:Go for it by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Maybe technological progress is a way to decrease poverty? Maybe there will be more jobs created if some of the work is outsorced to small firms?

    5. Re:Go for it by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      well in the case of china and india it has little to do with science and more to do with antionla pride. dont assume otherwise. both of these nations feel they have something to prove.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    6. Re:Go for it by BigTom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's why they are having a debate about it. The Indian space program has always been less about national prestige than some others and more focused on raising money and benefiting the population, that's why they do so many earth monitoring satellites (and they recently launched their edusat (?) for improving education facilities in remote populations).

      Hopefully if they do decide to put someone up they'll have done a good cost benefit on it.

    7. Re:Go for it by LWATCDR · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There was a great joke once on Johnny Carson. "A cure for dysintary, literacy, and indoor plumbing. Name three things India needs more than nuclear weapons." India is buying SU-27s fighters, renting an Oscar Class SSGN, and working on building it's own aircraft carrier. All of which are more of a waste of money than space travel. I love the old we should spend the money on the problems on earth first line. What a load. As to the US not being an example. Also a crock that could only come from someone that has never been two a third world nation. Just for the record the US's Space program is under 1% of the budget. Maybe just maybe if India puts more effort into space they will put a little less effort into nukes, aircraft carriers, and subs. Come on India I dare you, you backward 3rd world nation try and put a person in to orbit, try to go to the moon, I bet you can't match what the US did over 40 years ago. What the EU still has not done on it's own yet. I bite my thumb at thee.
      And I hope all your crews come back safe, and that you reach a little farther.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Go for it by kaalamaadan · · Score: 5, Informative
      Indians have looked down. One of the most impressive scientific achievements of India (not much spoken of generally) is that there has not been any famine in Independent India.

      The efficient British administration bungled on this as late as Bengal Famine, 1943. In fact, 3 million are supposed to have died in this famine, and caused , among other things, caused Amartya Sen to take up economics, in particular, famine studies.

      On the other hand, basic science (like space research) deserves to be encouraged by all (civilized) nations. Imagine medieval Italians or 18th century Britons waiting till all poverty was eradicated. Science and civilization do not progress in such a manner.

    9. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's going to make the fries when everyone has been "helped"?

      If you're volunteering, I'd also like a Big Mac and a regular Coke.

      Thanks.

    10. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS. Until we solve all our problems down here, we have no business being up there. We have done such a stellar job with Planet Earth... let's bring our current crappy civilization to the whole galaxy. Great plan! NOT.

    11. Re:Go for it by rainer_d · · Score: 1

      > Look down and see the squalor that so much of
      > their people live in.

      We're luck they are so poor.
      Same for the Chinese.
      If every Chinese wanted to eat just one chicken per week more, world-supplies of corn/crop would not be sufficient to raise these chickens.

      And what do you think would happen if China and India had a car-density like Germany or the US (and fuel-consumption like US-cars) ?
      Currently, there's no way another 2 billion people can live an "American Way of Life", at least not very long.
      The only problem is that politicians haven't openly acknowledged it yet, but they are very close ;-)

      Rainer

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    12. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why yes, equal distribution of wealth should be a priority. When everyone has an equal share of nothing, I'm sure you'll feel better.

    13. Re:Go for it by banzai51 · · Score: 1
      Maybe if you spawned entire new industries with well paying jobs they wouldn't have to worry about the living conditions of the people on the ground.

      Kind of like the space program. And I'm sure the vast majority would see the living conditions of America as a vast improvement. I guess the highest GNP per capita in the world is to ignoble a goal for them Indians, eh?

    14. Re:Go for it by JW+Troll · · Score: 1

      mass starvation, rampant disease and the highest AIDS rate in the world are valid counters to your argument.

      Unless you are about to propose that we simply blast all the diseased, homeless & hungry Indians into orbit.

      --
      just like the humble blood clot... turboporsche@telus.net
    15. Re:Go for it by Fyoozen · · Score: 1

      My only concern is nuclear powers using the space program as an experimental platform for creating ICBM's. There are too many in the world already. If it is truly for research, experimentation, and to place feet on another celestial body, I wish them God's speed and blessing. If not, a pox on them all!

      --
      Semper BS-us! He has a wife you know...
    16. Re:Go for it by centauri · · Score: 1

      It might be comforting to think that ending all "nonessential" programs would go a long way toward solving all those problems, but it's highly likely they'd still be around after such exploration was dead and cold. It's fine to work on those problems concurrently, but to stop space travel until their fixed is pointless, as there will be another set of problems to deal with after that.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    17. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with the heuristic you use is that you only consider the importance of the entire task, i.e. solving world hunger is more important than going to space.

      While that might be true, you neglect to see that going to space is vastly easier than solving world hunger. So its simply a better investment to go to space than spend time vainly trying to solve a nearly impossible problem.

    18. Re:Go for it by TheWizardOfCheese · · Score: 2

      This argument comes up everytime there's an article about space exploration.

      Yes, well it's bound to come up if you insist on raising it, isn't it? Here's what the OP actually said:

      There [are] a few imbalances in the world that need to be sorted out and space is one of them. The more the merrier.

      Clearly, the imbalance meant is the domination of space by first-world powers, and the more the merrier is simple approbation. The post simply doesn't stand up as sarcasm.

      Not that I agree with you illiterate wackos - I'm just standing up for truth and beauty. Never has my sig seemed more apposite.

      --

      "The good reader is a rarer swan than the good writer."
    19. Re:Go for it by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Its not the government's problem if the people over-reproduce themselves into impovershment; socialism will work, provided you're ok with equalizing to the stone age (and then having capitalism rise again, as someone figures out that they can bang rocks together better than other people)

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    20. Re:Go for it by Uncle+Barnard's+Star · · Score: 1
      If we were to wait until everyone in the world had their basic needs covered, progress in other areas would never happen.
      Wrong. Progress would never happen, period.
    21. Re:Go for it by AnnaSaru · · Score: 1

      perhaps you got a bit carried away there.

    22. Re:Go for it by JW+Troll · · Score: 1

      after a bit of thought, I don't see why they can't solve both problems at once ;)
      Why not pack all the criminals/cripples/hungry/AIDS-wracked into a giant rocket and press the trigger? Make it one-way for the moon. Saves the expense of ensuring return-trip safety, and gets India into the space race all in one glorious shot! Maybe pack a lion or three on board, that'll sell the TV rights in a microsecond.
      Sounds good, eh? Win-win-win all 'round.

      --
      just like the humble blood clot... turboporsche@telus.net
    23. Re:Go for it by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for that point of view, it suffers from a lack of historical support. In the past, it was those who pushed beyond the known limits and explored the frontier that brought about the greatest improvement to the human condition. The explorers themselves often paid a high price for their efforts, but more was gained than lost.

      We don't have as many frontiers as we used to have, perhaps. But space is no different in that context and all the more important for that reason. Realistically, the human race has only two ways to go at this point: either we move forward, or we die. Or end up living in caves again. So you're right ... we do have a lot of problems down here. But we need to keep exploring all the frontiers we have, examine all our options, in the hope that we'll be able to find those answers.

      I mean ... why is space exploration so much of a problem for you? Should we pull back from exploring our oceans because he haven't solved all the problems on land? Should we stop medical research because some people don't have enough to eat? Once you go down that road all is lost. There is too much hope and promise in exploring the unknown for us to just stop. My belief is that we cannot, if we hope to survive as a civilization.

      Columbus discovered the New World. He wasn't trying to do that, of course, but he managed to do it just the same. Well, this is the twenty-first century my friend, and space is our New World. Odds are, once we get out there with a real self-sustaining manned presence and begin to populate our solar system, we will find things of equal or greater value. Sure, you can't point to a given line of inquiry and say "this is going to pay off", but we've learned from thousands of years of experience that if we keep trying we will get results. We just have to have the vision and persistence of a Christopher Columbus (and all those who followed in his footsteps) and the human race will be a lot better off and a lot harder to kill.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    24. Re:Go for it by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Two hundred years ago, there was no way that Americans could live the "American way of life"--at least, not for very long. Between now and the time China "catches up" with America, the "American way of life" will most likely have moved on to something vastly more expensive and yet vastly more efficient. I suspect that the "Chinese way of life" will do something similar, and similarly sustainable. Human history has a lot of stories of civilizations adapting and advancing as conventional resource exploitation methods result in "unsustainable" population growth. On the other hand, the number of stories about civilizations that advance themselves into extinction for lack of resources is quite small.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    25. Re:Go for it by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Read it and the parent (at -1) :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  7. Easy solution by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 4, Funny
    The issues being debated before starting work on the mission include cost-benefit and other space priorities.
    The obvious solution is to cut costs by outsourcing to India. I would estimate that project costs can be cut by 30% by outsourcing to India. The real benefit is that because they are already in India, this can be done recursively. So they will save 30% by outsourcing to India the first time, then another 30% by outsourcing a second time, and so on and so forth until the actual cost approaches zero.
    1. Re:Easy solution by zx75 · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that a blind man and his dog in India are pondering a manned launch into space?

      Thats pretty damn good...

      --
      This is not a sig.
    2. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they have a guy named Sam in their hydroponics section...

      Gold star if you guess this reference.

  8. They should do it!! by sameerdesai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course being an Indian and having worked with ISRO I feel strongly about it. The space is definitely the next frontier. So far India has done incredible projects related to weather, remote sensing, etc. It's definitely time to venture into this. And this is not just showing technological superiority (and I definitely will see more posts on NASA outsorcing) but that's the proud thing that India can launch vehicles in space at much much lower costs. Putting this in perspective helps in going through further projects like star wars (when US is already thinking about making it a reality). Besides India also faces competition from its neighbor China in space frontiers.

    1. Re:They should do it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goody!, a US space station the size of a small moon.

      Condaliza Rice is Moff Tarkin, right? Who's Darth Vadar? Cheney or Rummsfield?

    2. Re:They should do it!! by Monokeros · · Score: 1

      Who does that make W?

      --
      The Statue of Liberty is America's lawn jockey.
    3. Re:They should do it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but that's the proud thing that India can launch vehicles in space at much much lower costs.

      Thanks. Rub it in, Buddy. And, when you are done with it, can I have my job back?

  9. Offsite expansion welcome by Neil+Watson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any offsite expainsion of the human race is welcome. We can't continue to depend of the Earth for everything.

    1. Re:Offsite expansion welcome by usernotfound · · Score: 1

      see: "the moon is a harsh mistress"

      --
      You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
    2. Re:Offsite expansion welcome by mctanis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually in the short term it'll be worse. At least while we're using the resources planet side, there is hope that it'll be recycled.

      Any offsite expansion in the near future (couple of decades at least) would require nearly all supplies be provided from Earth. Now those resources will likely leave and never return, reducing the total amount of resources planet side for the rest of us.

      But I agree with other posters, we need someone other then NASA working with manned space missions -- even private space ventures in the U.S. are showing that development can be done on the cheap.

      The U.S. public/politicians need to remember, that 99.9999% safety factors are not required - this is a frontier, one of the last, and people will die. Keep as safe as we can, within reasonable limits and you'll never have a shortage of volunteers. And once we've got equipment working, and private space flight happening -- the safety margins will improve. But as long as it's a one man (or two counting Rusia) show, the technologies involved will stagnate and costs will just continue to rise.

    3. Re:Offsite expansion welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I think the human race is like a bunch of crack-head junkies squatting in a mansion.

      It used to be a nice place, but now they've pissed and shit all over it, never took care of it, the roof leaks and the walls are crumbling.

      Now, some of these junkies want to go and find another place to wreck.

      Why can't we just take care of what we have?

    4. Re:Offsite expansion welcome by ostrich2 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, we have relied on the earth for everything for the last 150M years or so...is it going somewhere now?

    5. Re:Offsite expansion welcome by JugglingPilot · · Score: 1

      Well its worked for the last several millenia so i dont see the problem in continuing.

    6. Re:Offsite expansion welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Offsite expansion welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a frontier, one of the last,

      Indeed, one might say that space is "the final frontier"...

      Sorry.

  10. Re:Here's a q by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    They manage to fit the American ego in there, so I don't see why not.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  11. to the contrary by non · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a recent guardian weekly article states that it is not considered worth the estimated US$ 2 billion it would cost to put a man on the moon.

    --
    ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
    1. Re:to the contrary by Joe+Decker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, because we have to spend five times that much to give payola to tobacco farmers. Not that I'm bitter.

    2. Re:to the contrary by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1

      (And yes, yes, different countries, unfair comparison.)

    3. Re:to the contrary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes, the guardian, bastion of progress.

    4. Re:to the contrary by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      reference plzkthx

      --
      [o]_O
    5. Re:to the contrary by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1

      Sure. The snark was in reference to the ten billion dollar payout to tobacco farmers, in "compensation" for them giving up other subsidies we'd given them in the past. As a US thing, it's not (and I mentioned this in a ccomment to my own comment) a fair alap against what would be a non-US $2B expenditure.

    6. Re:to the contrary by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      Goddamned tax-and-spend liberals wasting 10 billion dollars when our boys in Iraq don't have body armor. >_<

      --
      [o]_O
    7. Re:to the contrary by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1
      Tax-and-spend politicians of every stripe, in fact. Just checked who signed that legislation into law, and which party passed that bill in the House. (I'm a whacko mix of strange poltiics, myself.)

      But I agree with you about the body armor, big time.

    8. Re:to the contrary by jthayden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, offense, but look at who has contributed the most to the National Debt in their presidential terms. While I don't agree with the terminalogy, I'll take a "tax and spend liberal" over a "spend conservative." What we really need for awhile is some "tax and don't spend moderates" for four terms or so. Good luck with that though.

  12. I can see the future .... by dustpuppy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    and it is a future of hordes of Indian 'cab-drivers' piloting the equivalent of SpaceShip One back and forth between earth and orbit .... not to mention they will be the first to open a 'Kwik-e-mart' aboard the ISS. Thank you, please come again!

    1. Re:I can see the future .... by sahirh · · Score: 1

      Wow.. talk about someone with narrow vision. Get a life, read up about Indian culture -- and maybe you'll understand that you live in a *very* small fishbowl my friend.

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:I can see the future .... by dustpuppy · · Score: 1

      wow ... talk about someone who can't see when someone is playing up to stereotype.

    3. Re:I can see the future .... by qray · · Score: 1

      Yes, saddly, [s]he must actually believes that you believe all Indians are like that and/or everyone reading your post would believe that as well. I think most people are intelligent and versed enough to recognize your post as hyperbole. Isn't there some saying about "protesting too much"?

    4. Re:I can see the future .... by steve.m · · Score: 1

      You mean being racist?

    5. Re:I can see the future .... by dustpuppy · · Score: 1

      No, being racist is the belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.

      I imply neither of those in my comment. I merely played to the stereotype and common observation that there are a lot of Indian cab drivers and those that own convenience stores.

      A stereotype that is recognised the world over and reflected in shows like the Simpsons. Would you say the Simpsons are racist? I think not.

      Geez man, lighten up - it's people like you who breed intolerance.

  13. More Access by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In view of the problems we've had with the shuttle, I think the more countries that can send people into orbit and retrieve them, the better. We should make available to India and China our docking adapter plans and technical assistance, so all spacecraft can dock to a common interface.

    1. Re:More Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know a whole lot about our docking adapters, but what I've seen looks awfully clumsy, maybe if they develop their own we'll get something better.

    2. Re:More Access by pranay · · Score: 1

      Thinking USB?

  14. Role Reversal by clinko · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet they do it about 25% of the price.

    Although they'll have to outsource to Americans that used to work at NASA

    NASA: "Hello? This is Gutmar."

    INDIA: "Yeah, 'Gutmar', your real name is something like 'David' or 'Paul' isn't it? Damned Americans taking our jobs."

    NASA: "My Friend, I cannot tell you where I am. It is not our policy My Friend."

    1. Re:Role Reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Damned Americans taking our jobs"

      I know you mean it as a joke. But ironically, I have heard it here (India) 10 years ago. It was the time when all small local business were being outrun by large international brands. One small shop owner who sells a local cola (and yes it does taste terrible! no wonder people were buying pepsi or coke) made this comment. I am surprised now its the other way round.

      I wont be surprised if your comment becomes true again in another 10 years.

    2. Re:Role Reversal by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I know you mean it as a joke. But ironically, I have heard it here (India) 10 years ago. It was the time when all small local business were being outrun by large international brands. One small shop owner who sells a local cola (and yes it does taste terrible! no wonder people were buying pepsi or coke) made this comment. I am surprised now its the other way round.

      The problem is not so much "countries", but large international corporations. They have too much influence over trade policy. The majority of Americans are probably more relunctant about "free-trade" than it would appear from laws actually passed because big biz has too much influence over politicians. America is half plutocracy and half democracy.

      Even in the small towns in the mid-west, the "Bush voters", the people there have no great fondness for large conglomerates like Wal-Mart, Microsoft, etc.

    3. Re:Role Reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The majority of Americans are probably more relunctant about "free-trade" than it would appear from laws actually passed because big biz has too much influence over politicians."

      That makes no sense. You guys are a democracy and if you dont like your leaders, change them. Ultimatly corporations dont elect. People do.

    4. Re:Role Reversal by autophile · · Score: 1
      NASA: "Hello? This is Gutmar."
      INDIA: "Yeah, 'Gutmar', your real name is something like 'David' or 'Paul' isn't it? Damned Americans taking our jobs."
      Indian Accent Training?

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    5. Re:Role Reversal by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense. You guys are a democracy and if you dont like your leaders, change them. Ultimatly corporations dont elect. People do.

      But for the most part we vote for people, not individual laws. Thus, corporations can push individual laws by rewarding politicians that support their agendas.

  15. Competition Good by Bruha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With Brazil, Several Private groups, China, and India all now shooting for space it would hopefully put some pressure on our space spending which has dropped off considerably since the end of the cold war.

    Perhaps if we convinced there was oil on the moon there would be more intrest but I belive the current compeition will help. It's bad enough our engineers are being squeezed out by cheap alternatives in other countries but losing out on our space program could have profound results elsewhere in our economy. We'll go from being a tech leader to a tech backwater. Were already there with our network infrastructure, were getting there with our engineering based workforces and high tech jobs going overseas.

    Worse if you look at things you may notice that our society and economic structure may eventually destroy our country. With inflation on nearly everything it's becoming nearly impossible to compete with other countries. sure you can compare their living conditions vs ours but does everything here have to be so damned expensive? When I was born the average house sold for 55,000 dollars. Today you're lucky to see them in the 80's and the average is 250,000 where I live worse in some other areas. What justifies all that price jumping?

    Worse is we have a president that went from a 5 trillion dollar surplus to hitting a 8 trillion dollar deficit. Where the hell did we spend all that money. IIRC those iraq spending bills were in the billions per year but looking at the deficit it's obvious that the money is going somewhere else unknown to the american public. Who are we paying and for what?

    1. Re:Competition Good by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can blame Carter for causing the 15% inflation rates during the 70's for driving up costs. That 5 trillion dollar surplus was an estimate of what would come in at the current rates. That estimate was based on prediction before the tech buble burst. After the buble burst those predictions went right out the window. Current inflation rates are around 1%.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Competition Good by S3D · · Score: 1


      Perhaps if we convinced there was oil on the moon there would be more intrest
      While there is no oil on the Moon there is some Helium-3 in the Moon regolith, which can make Moon a stepping stone for other, more helium-3 reach sources (gas giants)

    3. Re:Competition Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spewing figures without context doesn't make you smart. It makes you a retard.

      Do you even know what the fuck inflation is? Do you think it only affects the US?

      You're such a moron.

  16. Re:its not it's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't they call the possessive of it "zwyx" so that more people can make the difference?

  17. Manned Space Flight is beneficial to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For India, this actually has a lot of benefits.
    Ironically the USA at this point doesnt have the same benefit return on manned spaceflight that India has.

    1) Commercial satellite contracts will be easier to get for a variety of reasons and insurance of those launches cost less as well

    2) it will encourage indian kids to get into science

    3) Reduce dependency on imported foreign technology by developing local talent in engineering and also the extensive IT etc. other support systems needed. Depending on imports is fine, but you need to have knowledge in case there is a loss for some reason.

    4) Having a missile program is good for defense (sorry but its true given the way the world is, with all the whacko rogue states running around)

    5) Be able to hook up with the ISS and carry out experiments in semiconductors (crystal growth) .. and pharmaceuticals in zero G environment without having to pay for expensive robotic equipment ..and yes lives on the ground will be saved by the economic and social benefits of being able to do this kind of research.

    1. Re:Manned Space Flight is beneficial to India by johnjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      4) Having a missile program is good for defense (sorry but its true given the way the world is, with all the whacko rogue states running around)

      Remember how, before 9/11, one of the biggest international worries was that the newly nuclear Pakistan and India would start nuclear war with each other?

      I don't know who gets the credit for it, because I wasn't paying attention, but isn't it nice that the worry about India using ICBMs on Pakistan (or anyone else) has become much less pronounced in the last few years? I agree that your point is valid, but I'm glad that when I hear this type of news I don't automatically think that India's interest in manned spaceflight is a thinly veiled threat to Pakistan.

      (I know that India doesn't need ICBMs to attack Pakistan, but I associate the US's space program with the cold war and research on ICBMs. I don't immediately associate India's program with the Kashmir dispute.)

    2. Re:Manned Space Flight is beneficial to India by bgalehouse · · Score: 1
      Regarding point 4, this is a big deal for any nuclear power. A very big deal. It is perhaps the standard method by which a country demonstrates their ability to build ICBMs. Shorter ranged weapons are great deal smaller, and do not require heat shielding, etc.

      So what beligerant states does India need near orbital devices to reach?

    3. Re:Manned Space Flight is beneficial to India by Jameth · · Score: 2, Funny
      So what beligerant states does India need near orbital devices to reach?
      The USA?
    4. Re:Manned Space Flight is beneficial to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) Having a missile program is good for defense (sorry but its true given the way the world is, with all the whacko rogue states running around)

      Not sure if you meant it in this way, but the only "rogue state" missile programs defend against is the USA. There's a reason only countries without WMD (Iraq, Afganistan) get attacked by the USA and countries that with WMD (North Korea) don't.

    5. Re:Manned Space Flight is beneficial to India by pranay · · Score: 1
      2) it will encourage indian kids to get into science
      Duh..around 80% indian kids are already into engineering and sciences. And talking about numbers, India has the largest pool of scientists and engineers in the world.
  18. Let's do it together by elh_inny · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Too bad all the nations can't get into an agreement, if there was a single space program for the whole world, it'd be both easier to swallow from the economical point of view and would be good from a scientific point of view, instead of reinventing the wheel scientists could focus on the real problems.

    As long as India is concerned, it's a bit harsh to spend bilions of dollars to send ppl into space, when so many in India are starving etc. However the problem is well beyond my comprehension, I bet that if they actually did spend the money just to buy some food, next ppl would be starving again, if however they spend on research, with some luck they will develop technological means to overcome poverty.

    What bothers me most with developing countries is the fact that despite spreading diseases, high mortality, poverty, bad living conditions, the law (as in China) there is still growth in population. I won't have a child unless I can secure his future up until University at least, they just don't care...

    1. Re:Let's do it together by akintayo · · Score: 1

      You do realise that in some societies, the more children you have the better it will be for the family. While population growth is a problem, it is generally in the best interest of most rural couples to have large families.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    2. Re:Let's do it together by Jimmy+The+Tulip · · Score: 1

      I'll just comment on the point about starving people in India. Do you know that people starve in India, not because that govt. don't have money and can't buy them food, but because of corruption and other issues.

      An indian author "amartya sen" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amartya_Sen also won nobel prize for a book which analzed poverty and famine http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Soci ology/Economic/?ci=0198284632&view=usain india. It clearly showed that having/saving billons will not help anybody, because if was the reason it could have been solved years ago. sane people in india, have child and earn their lives to secure his future. thats how things work. becuase they dont have social security. keeping same pace in technology upgrades the status of a nation.

    3. Re:Let's do it together by bheer · · Score: 1

      Too bad all the nations can't get into an agreement, if there was a single space program for the whole world

      One day, humans will finally stop being suspicous backbiters and untrustworthy assholes in general and the resulting peace and prosperity will give us a Star Trek-ish future.

      Until then, competition's the ticket for getting anything done. You think the space race in the 60s was all about brotherhood of man?

      What bothers me most with developing countries is the fact that despite spreading diseases, high mortality, poverty, bad living conditions, the law (as in China) there is still growth in population.

      There is strong correlation between superior living conditions and lower numbers of children per family unit. Google. Unsurprisingly, most of India's 300 million+ middle class has 1-2 kids.

    4. Re:Let's do it together by totipotentsoul · · Score: 1

      Their choice isn't really University or not, it's having a child who can do work around the house, farm, etc. Plus it takes time for a country to change their outlook on procreation when the benefits of modern technology are given to them - before the death rate probably matched the birth rate. The same thing happened in England at the start of the industrial revolution. Not that it's still not a bad thing for us. I like China's policy, and I don't believe they're growing. In any case, you could say it's stupid for the United States to breed so slowly - who will take care of you when you're old?

      --
      The best posts are both flamebait and informative.
    5. Re:Let's do it together by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      As long as India is concerned, it's a bit harsh to spend bilions of dollars to send ppl into space, when so many in India are starving etc.....there is still growth in population. I won't have a child unless I can secure his future up until University at least, they just don't care...

      That's it! Launch a giant capsule over India that splits apart, spreading condums to rain down on the poor. See, the space program *can* help.

    6. Re:Let's do it together by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look at what Apollo and Mir accomplished during the era of competition. Look at what the International Space Station has accomplished (pretty much zilch) for more money than either of those two programs. "Let's do it together" is a nice sentiment, but it doesn't appear to get anything done.

      If you want these developing countries to stop having so many babies, the only proven way to do so is to get them developed, and that can only come through technology.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    7. Re:Let's do it together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who do you blame for this cruel and heartless corruption? The British left decades ago.

    8. Re:Let's do it together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as how stupid the indians are, they will probably use them as balloons for their weddings.

    9. Re:Let's do it together by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

      Sadly, that doesn't even seem to work out in the wilds of science/technology like ITER. That project, (to build a next generation fusion reactor prototype) has been mired in the mud for a very very long time simply because of all the countries/political agendas involved.

      I'd love what you suggest too, but do you really see
      everybody holding hands (under a UN mandate) and doing this. Hmm. Didn't think so.

      Mavericks (and I sort of think he wouldn't mind me calling him that) like Burt Rutan, and the others doing the X-prize things *will* make this happen. I know it looks as if it's just Burt, but we hope and pray for competition. I hope to see the pre-cambrian explosion in full flow real soon now...

      India, despite all of its problems, *is* the worlds largest democracy, and even if its viewpoint is not to the liking of the worlds most greedy and self-centred one, that is something that as an Englishman I admire.

      I wish them good luck, and look forward to seeing them able to bargain at the table with the big guys for what exactly we should all do in manned space flights. It will happen. Perhaps soon.

      Already in 2004 we have seen the dream of manned space flight change back to one we thought was totally lost. Perhaps tomorrow, we will be debating how to deal with treaties for mining the moon. I sure hope so...

      As an aside, I don't think that spending in this area is totally devoid of military implications, and everybody should be aware of the potential that the first use of nukes in space may come about because of clashes with Indias neighbour Pakistan.

      Bad things, good things. Just interesting things really. Business as usual.

  19. Arms Race opens second great age by crypTeX · · Score: 1

    What with the US government abandoning any real pretense of not militarizing space, I doubt there will be any real outsourcing, but we might get to see an honest to god space battle in our lifetimes (if you're young) and India and China really get into this.

  20. India going to space. by yoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The more countries we have going to space the less chance there is of our own space program stagnating. Competition will keep our Congress people's attention. Even if they would rather put the resources into another payraise for themselves or Halliburton, they will have to think about the stigma of the US losing its place as the world leader in space on their watch.

    --
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act!" -- George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair)
    1. Re:India going to space. by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

      And why exactly, do we need to be the "leader" in the space race? I see hundreds of billions of dollars being dumped into NASA, yet I can name about 10 school districts in my area that have terrible facilities, old, outdated books, high crime, underperforming students and crappy teachers.
      But I guess that's not so important anymore.

    2. Re:India going to space. by yoder · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying the money should not go to education, health care, or any number of things. What I'm saying is that I'd rather it go to a space program than to Corporate Welfare or pork to help a Congress critter get re-elected.

      My priorities (off the top of my head)
      Health care
      Education
      Programs to help elderly and children
      Science
      Everything else.

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act!" -- George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair)
    3. Re:India going to space. by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      India, China & Russia: Congratulations to our taikonauts/cosmonauts/zergs on Mars! It was hard work, but we believed in you! We are very proud of you! Come home safely!

      Congress: The United States of America is the greatest nation in the world, and our space program is the absolute best in the world. In fact, no other country even comes close.

      Who do you think the people are going to believe?

      --
      [o]_O
    4. Re:India going to space. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      National defense?

      Doesn't matter?

      That only works in Europe because Uncle Sam foots the security bill. /Canadian thankful the Americans have done all the heavy lifting in the past 50 years while the disgraceful politicians in my country let the military shrivel and wither. Da Canadian values.

  21. I had a solution to that by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "As long as India is concerned, it's a bit harsh to spend bilions of dollars to send ppl into space, when so many in India are starving etc. However the problem is well beyond my comprehension, I bet that if they actually did spend the money just to buy some food, next ppl would be starving again, if however they spend on research, with some luck they will develop technological means to overcome poverty."

    What I was thinking the other day was to have a governmental construction force, similar to the army, to build cities. Anyone who wants to volunteer for work will be given work to build a city. Houses/schools/places of buisness would be made that otherwise would not have been made, and not with a plan.

    Make a governmental food program too, but it doesn't have to be tasty, just really cheap food thats nutritional. Most people wouldn't want to eat it except those who are starving.

    With food and shelter taken care of, people wouldn't be in trouble and can spend their time on an education and bettering society themself.

  22. Wrong Priorities by Ed+Almos · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I would be more impressed if they could feed the millions of poor in the Indian sub-continent. Sure, a manned space shot by India would be impressive, but it matters very little to the man on the streets of Bombay who has to beg in order to feed his family.

    Ed Almos
    Budapest, Hungary

    --
    The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus, 56-120 A.D.
    1. Re:Wrong Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Eliminating the space program won't help him!!

      The space program will help by providing jobs and encouragement to learn science .. that goes a long way compared to the additional 50cents that could be given to each individual in India by not having a space program.

      India's space budget is only 550 million .. that's just 50 cents per person in india (India has over 1 billion people).

      Please find less wasteful program to bitch about instead of one that encourages science and will improve the agricultural, health, and economic condition of people.

    2. Re:Wrong Priorities by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I find things like this very upsetting. For instance, in order to save money (read: free up funds for $15.8 Billion in pork), the current budget proposed in the U.S. Congress had cuts for science funding, low-income education, environmental concerns, and other things.

      NASA did get a boost; however, I wonder if that boost will go towards Star Wars II more than anything?

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Wrong Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people here in Finland (and no doubt in the rest of the "old" western Europe) still treat Hungary and neighbouring central European countries as "poor, eastern European countries" which should either be thankful that they can be in the EU and not complain, or do this and that, just because the living standard is lower. In the process they manage to behave like they don't have any problems themselves, the biggest not-problem often being poverty, of course.

      I'm not one of those people. My views on India are quite similar to my views about central Europe* - I think both are the same as my country, just with some differences in the numbers.

      I in no way think you have any extra responsibility to understand India's problems because someone else thinks similar thoughts about Hungary or some other place; I just use the fact as an "eye-opener".

      (*"eastern Europe" kind of lost it's point as a term for me after I realized that the Czech Republic in its entirety is further west than Finland)

  23. Space VS Marine Development for 1B souls? by spartan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    India of course has a segment of their population that is tech-savvy, but that does not mean the rest of the country is doing well. They have about one billion mouths to feed over there and exploitation of space ought to be one of their last concerns.

    That being said, they have an ocean on their border and it seems a much more worthy opportunity that would lead to being able to adequately take care of their population by exploiting that, and developing science that is marine-based, as opposed to space based.

  24. Wonderful stats.... by RazorJ_2000 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    With statistics like this, it really makes sense to be trying to build spacecraft.

    http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/india_statisti cs.html

    --
    pi=sigma{n:0-infinity}[(1/16)^n][(4/(8n+1))-(2/(8n +4))-(1/ (8n+5))-(1/(8n+6))]
  25. Can India beat Burt Rutan to the moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a market for cheap space flight. Some of the X-Prize competitors said that they would continue development because there are tourists willing to pay big bucks to get into space. The trick is to be able to do it cheaply enough.

    I absolutely think India should go for it. Their focus should be on doing it cheaply not just on doing it for the sake of doing it.

  26. I know what i'm talking about by IdentityChicken · · Score: 0, Troll

    if india did that nothing would work. I have my resources. if you go to http://www.freewebs.com/identitychicken/ (which is a very reliable site btw), it gives DETAILED information on why this is bull. go check it out. you'll be impressed. Im a brain surgan, so I know a lot about this stuff. They people who are doing this, have no idea what their doing. Why would they do that? They dont even have adaquite technology and brains to get the job done depending on how you look at the situation (btw when I look at it thats what I think). Again, heres the site, and feel free to comment on any untrue information posted there. http://www.freewebs.com/identitychicken/

  27. how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    india fixes the horrendous problems with poverty, sanitation and education they have before shooting people in space.

    on the other hand, a curry powered rocket could be cool

  28. Enthusiastic, but I have questions . . . by Badgerman · · Score: 1

    On a pure geek/technical and humanitarian level, I'm all for manned space flight. More the better. More chance to explore, more chance to get off of the earth, more chance for humanity to survive, and more chance for us to turn our attention to something worthwhile. Plus, of course, cool technical benefits.

    However, it seems to me a lot of countries are jumping into the space race, and I'm concerned about conflicts, territoriality, and inappropriate militarization. It seems it's getting awful crowded up there pretty quick.

    This is an area I'm not as informed as I'd like to be, and I wonder if people know:
    1) How many countries have made successful space flight and what they've done.
    2) What plans they have for the future.
    3) What treaties exist concerning space flight.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
  29. Is there still a point to MANNED space flight? by mckwant · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Other than the "neato" factor? I'd think, after Hubble, and the (still going) mars rovers, that we'd be able to do neater things with unmanned space flights, and we would have to worry less about things like food, water, and air.

    Not trying to be a killjoy, I'm just curious.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
    1. Re:Is there still a point to MANNED space flight? by Omkar · · Score: 1

      Redundant Array of Inexpensive Planets.

    2. Re:Is there still a point to MANNED space flight? by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      Oh, sure, we've ruined our planet, now we're gonna RAIP space??

      (Is there a -1 bad pun mod? I hope not...)

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    3. Re:Is there still a point to MANNED space flight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EARTH FIRST (we'll stripmine the other planets later)

    4. Re:Is there still a point to MANNED space flight? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Many. Man is adaptable. AI is not (yet?). Robots are great for somethings, but not for others. Use them together and more can be done.

      My favorite is that it is there and I want to go. I want to walk on Mars myself, and be back in time for thanksgiving dinner. (As I write this thanksgiving is 3 days away) I want to see the far side of the moon with my own eyes. Sure it is all useless, but by that argument I shouldn't have gone to Hawaii. For that matter we should bulldoze the arctic wilderness, because that is the easiest way to get the useful oil under there.

  30. Hmmm by detritus. · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they'll outsource some jobs to America.

  31. I say, Bravo India by Aggrazel · · Score: 1

    Its just my opinion that the more countries we have on a quest for knowledge, the better.

    After all, the more countries who can build spacecraft the better when the aliens come invading... ... just saying.

  32. out sorcerer ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm tired of all this talk I here about out-sorcerer-ing this and out-sorcerer-ing that. Are our own witches, warlocks and wizards not good enough? Do the incantations of home-grown covens no longer work? Is even "Charmed" to be produced in another country? I can't take it anymore !

  33. Whereas... by lxt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I'm frankly sick of all the damned jingoism and nationalist fever in the red states" ...whereas there's none of that in the red state of China? No self delusion and jingoism in China? None at all?

    1. Re:Whereas... by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Funny

      The United States of America is the Shining City on the Hill, a candle in the dark and an example for the rest of the world. If we want to eliminate self-delusion and jingoism in China, we're going to have to start by eliminating it in our own backyard.

      --
      [o]_O
    2. Re:Whereas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is not any jingoismisticnism in the red states. That intellectual smuttery is as dramastical as it is rascally. Dont compare red state with evil red vile China!!!

      Only Jingles exist in the red states.
      Like a good neighbor, Red states are there! er ....

      Just call us and we take care of you, accident or tickets too, 524-1541.

      As for China, I dont know shit about shinola concerning those paphappy sappies. And I dont want ta know!!!!!

      Well, I thought it was funny :)

    3. Re:Whereas... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      Carlin? Hey George, is that you? :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:Whereas... by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      The worst part is that I was trying to be serious ;_;

      You know, something like, "If you want to make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and then make the change..."

      --
      [o]_O
    5. Re:Whereas... by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

      Of course China has some rabid nationalists - any country does; the current leadership is also obviously self-delusional at points. Neither one of these two points, however, is relevant.

      The US has always criticized China for being oppressive and overtly nationalistic; China has rarely done the same without provocation.

      I fail to see how Americans waving US flags and watching Fox News spew back propaganda at them is different from China. Perhaps China is even less nationalistic; I've never seen anyone in China driving with the Red Flag on their car or hanging off of their balcony. Current US policy regarding Guntanomo Bay detentions and unlawful combatants as well as military action in Falluja aren't as bad as Chinese practices of course, but they're now at the level where they're within a degree of comparsion. The application of the death penalty in America has also been always criticized by Amnesty International - the same group that the US State Dept. often quotes to criticize China. (As a sidenote, it's odd that Human Rights condemnations of China get lots of press in America, but those same groups condemning America don't seem to make it into Fox News or CNN).

      So I guess my main point is this: to all the Americans who have a flag hanging off their house and car, who proudly sing their national anthem, who consider the cost of regieme-change acceptable , and gladly accept the stuff Fox News spews out: you're not that different from the Chinese People who you've always said were a benighted group needing to be led into the light of democracy. If anything, you're even more nationalistic now.

    6. Re:Whereas... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Such was my point.

      If you haven't listened to Carlin, you should. If he offends you without making you think, listen again :)

      But really my point was that the truth is often taken for humor... ... and such is life :)

      But then I'm semi-drunk, and my inpolitically uncorrect opinion is flying in fine skies today..lol

      Cheers,
      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  34. I hear... by vraxoin · · Score: 0

    ...that the Aloo Gobi food pouch tastes excellent!

  35. Agreeable... by lxt · · Score: 1

    ...given some of the poverty in India, one cannot help but agree. Why a manned mission? It's been proved over and over again that robotic missions can produce similar data to a manned mission, but with far lower cost. If India truly wanted to do this for science, why not a robotic mission? ...but presumably, there is some nationalist pride here as well. However, I do applaud their efforts to develop technology...

  36. Ewwey! by dbretton · · Score: 1, Funny


    Confined Space + Vindaloo Farts = Unpleasant Voyage.

  37. slight math error by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Sorry, this is a government project. Every attempt to decrease costs results in their doubling. You'll have to adjust your figures somewhat, but in the end it shouldn't be significant (as governments caluculate things).

    Since it's a government project, only the highest quality will be acceptable. These jobs must be outsourced to the People's Rebublic of China, where quality is ... more easily controlled.

    In response, the Germany will attack Poland and the French will surrender to Belgium.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  38. Re:Here's a q by krisp · · Score: 1

    hahaha mod parent up

  39. What's the point of this ? by Potatomasher · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Manned spaceflight has already been done 30+ years ago. The technology is there to do it. What China and India are doing is simply re-inventing the wheel.

    Ok its good for a country to have their own facilities from which they can launch satellites etc, but shouldn't we have a broader planet-wide space program ? Countries around the world should be collaborating in order to achieve the next big thing. Not just go at it by themselves in order to boost national pride.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    A million monkeys and this is the best sig they could come up with...
    1. Re:What's the point of this ? by king-manic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget, this particular wheel is a precursor to ICBM's. The US isn't going to share all the technology related to space flight, so China and india have to use a public program to get these technologies themselves.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:What's the point of this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright, then tell U.S. to make feely avilable all the technology behind it so that other countries don't have to reinvent the wheel.

    3. Re:What's the point of this ? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      So, then, you're saying that SpaceShipOne is 30+ years behind the times? Sometimes reinventing the wheel gives you a hovercraft.

  40. Re:I for one by xott · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I think this is a great development also.
    Making sure that the vastness of space does not end up W.A.S.P. is very important.
    Very little of the Earth's population is white, even fewer of any religon at all, yet nearly all astronauts have come from this group. (Tokenism notwithstanding).

    The greater variety of people to enter space, the greater amount to survive any threatening situation. I say, Go India

  41. Canadians in Space by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Imagine, Canadians in space. What a crazy idea.

    Imagine if they put Canadian made parts on the shuttle or ISS.

    1. Re:Canadians in Space by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      india is planning on PUTTING someone in space. Canada hasn't done this and isn't planning on it. Canada has contributed parts and we (US) send up an occassional Canadian astronaut, but outside of that India is making strides where Canada isn't.

    2. Re:Canadians in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Canada has contributed parts and we (US) send up an occassional Canadian astronaut, but outside of that India is making strides where Canada isn't.

      If India is advanced enough to be considering manned space missions, they're advanced enough to have Kyoto protocol CO2 limits apply to them. Same for China.

    3. Re:Canadians in Space by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      True. India is ready to sign the Kyoto protocol along with USA and rest of the world.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    4. Re:Canadians in Space by El · · Score: 4, Funny

      Canada is obviously delaying putting people into space until after they develop a reliable method for brewing beer in zero gravity...

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    5. Re:Canadians in Space by cluckshot · · Score: 1, Insightful

      franky the parent post should be modded off topic but since it came up... Why not ratify Kyoto for India? They are exept from its limits!

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    6. Re:Canadians in Space by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Canada is obviously delaying putting people into space until after they develop a reliable method for brewing beer in zero gravity...

      Right now there's only one country with any real manned capability, and they're not going to bother with beer. Distilling vodka in zero gravity, now, that's another matter.

      In time we can probably expect the US to get back into orbit, but seriously, would you want to drink their space beer? Bloody American beer, tastes like recycled piss...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  42. One way trip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not even entered as a consideration in our culture, but I'm just waiting for someone to escalate the space race by sending people out on one-way, yes, suicide missions. Sooner or later, it's bound to happen. We could make Mars no problem, if only we didn't have to deal with a return trip.

  43. turn this ship around!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Venugopal:OH DAMMIT, you don' bring chicken tikka with you Apu???
    Apu:OH very sorry, Venu! I no bring with me!
    Venugopal:OH my goodness!! what will we ever do??? turn this damn ship around and go get some!!!
    Apu:But it cost too much money for fuel! No can go back Venu!
    Venugopal:DAMMIT DAMMIT!! I am Venugopal!! i want chicken tikka dammit!! You shouldnt be astronaught Apu! You go back to driving CAB!!
    Apu:At least I don' work at Kwik-e-Mart!!

  44. Redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you mean redundant. He only told the joke once.

  45. point by usernotfound · · Score: 1

    Is the point to say "we've been to do moon", or do they plan on doing something worthwhile while they are there?
    We know quite a bit about the moon alrady, do we know enough to begin to be able to colonize it? I would like to say yes. We know about the moon. We may not know about our technology's ability to sustain us there, so they better be going with that in mind.
    We know we can get there, and they've got near 45 years technology on NASA. I would consider just getting there a waste of India's resources.

    --
    You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
  46. Do you have a future? by iyliki · · Score: 1

    Do you USA:ians have a mcdonalds "restaurant" and coke-machines aboard the ISS?

    1. Re:Do you have a future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tut-tut. According to the Bushiban the correct term for us is now Jesus-loving Freedom-spreaders.

  47. Re:Oh, great by Control+Group · · Score: 1
    Oh, come on. It might not have been funny, but it wasn't redundant when I started writing it.

    Sheesh

    Some people.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  48. Must we outsource EVERYTHING? by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 1

    I for one don't quite welcome our new space-overlords. I mean, great for India, I have nothing against them. But I can just see it now, corporations outsourcing space exploration to India because it is cheaper.

    Some things just should be done by those interested in them, even if it is more expensive. Exploration is one of them. But only time will tell I suppose.

  49. Yeah, but they don't have a Visa by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only hitch is that they dont' have a visa to enter space. :) If they do, odds are that is that the Gujus(Gujaratis) will have populated most of space with space motels in 7-8 years!

    (speaking as one has to do visa submission for wife for every fucking country we have to go to) If India is so advanced why is indian citizenship worth shite? Gah.

    sri

  50. Re:How about they work on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of that kind of reasoning. I'm pretty sure there are poor people in the US. Why don't you feed these people instead of paying $20M to hollywood stars, other astronomical sums to NBA/NFL players, and so on?

    Do you honestly believe the US makes better use of its money?

  51. Re:its not it's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But how would you handle this if you were writing a script for the New New Addams Family and had to refer to the hat belonging to Cousin It?

  52. Rocket technology applicable to ICBMs? by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will developing things like solid rocket booster technology be somewhat applicable to development of long-range missiles?

    I know that some of the hubbub surrounding Loral's technology used in Chinese satellite launches was because of the supposition that it would enhance PRC's ability to lob nukes over longer distances.

    Of course, since Pakistan is so close, I don't know how much of an impetus there is towards long-range missiles in India.

  53. Great by chas.capwell · · Score: 1

    Great! Another industry lost to outsourcing!

  54. Words of wisdom from the Grand Master by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum."

    - Sir Arthur C. Clarke

  55. But I spend all my money on squishies!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DAMNIT!! I Can'd buy visa!!! I spent all my DAMN money on squishies!!! Can I still go to space??

  56. Mission Control by gregarican · · Score: 1

    They give the maiden voyage a good thumbs up!

  57. If Your Not Going to Like the Answer, by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Then Don't Ask the Question.

    If the leaders of India have any respect for their people, then how could anything else but going into space matter?

  58. Er Priorities? by Tetsugaku-San · · Score: 0

    I would think they should sort out their damn poverty problems before they go and do something as expensive as putting people in space

    How many Indians lives is it worth for the prestige of getting into space.

  59. Re:Feed your people first... by MHleads · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... then worry about sending them to space.

    I am sick of such messages which regularly appear on the topic of some technological development in the developing nations. And these messages get moderated as +5 Insightful.

    If I were to use the same argument, then US should spend a little less on defence and bring the number of people below povery line to zero.

  60. Clear and obvious win for India's leaders by randall_burns · · Score: 1
    Space development is something that will pay handsomely for any country that does it correctly. Right now, India is focused on projects with clear, immediate payoffs-and there are quite a few such potential projects.


    It is sad the uber-rich and media/academic/financial elites running the US have shut down the US economy to the point the US hasn't been able to take advantage of technologies that were developed here.
    I suspect it will take something like another sputnik to turn that around. These plans on the part of India isn't really another Sputnik-but eventually we'll see something like that.


    Right now, there is the image that only large countries can do space. However, when I can easily imagine some highly profitable industries get developed in space-and then major commercial powers like Taiwan and Singapore get into the act.

    1. Re:Clear and obvious win for India's leaders by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Everybody always forgets canada. We can do space travel, but we choose to let our big brother do it and just help out. We have all the infrastructure to do anythign we want but we settle for just healthcare. We could have made the A-bomb ourselves, but we thought we wouldn't really have a use for it. The US Jet Airplane research in the 60's was partially derived from our designs and contained many Aero technicians. We're small, at 30 million soem cities have a larger population, but we have all the expertise and the resources to do anythign. Unfortunatly we lack the will to do these large projects.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:Clear and obvious win for India's leaders by randall_burns · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can easily imagine canada becoming a major technological power if the US continues its race to the bottom. I don't think it is just an issue of national will. The US and USSR both diplomatically pressured other nations(i.e. Germany) not to develop orbital capability. Part of it is the notion that _only_ large countries can do anything to do with space development-though the X-Prize went a long ways towards dispelling that. If the US implodes, I can easily imagine Canada, New Zealand and Australia developing space capability. For that matter, despite deindustrialization, a lot of the US industrial capacity is in "Blue States" that are immediately adjacent to Canada-and many of the residents of those states might prefer association with canada to association with a fascist, fundamentalist United States(if that develops).

  61. Re:Feed your people first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? America didn't.

  62. The more people in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the better, as far as I'm concerned. I'd love to be able to see my children (don't have any yet) or grandchildren take off-world vacations (or permanent residences) like people now-a-days take a jaunt down to the Carribean and such. And then thing that will push that is a completely global interest in space and it's exploration. Unfortunately though, I'm not a One World Government supporter, so it may be a bit difficult to have both.

  63. Re:Feed your people first... by Sebastian+Jansson · · Score: 1

    No. You can send them to the planet Marklar if you have spaceships!

    :-)

  64. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the US is the first to Mars, I'm frankly sick of all the damned "USA sucks" mentality that comes out of the blue states. Please USA, stick it to the liberals and be #1 once again.

  65. No they shouldn't!! by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are over 1 billion reasons not to go.
    The money should be spent on agricultural research and improved infrastructure.
    The average annual income in India is $450.

    Being an Indian, I feel strongly about it as well.

    1. Re:No they shouldn't!! by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >The average annual income in India is $450.

      Yeah, and the buying power of each $1 is significantly higher.

      You're an idiot if you compare USD to Rupee one for one.

      $1 USD is ~ Rs. 48

      That's a lot of money and significantly higher buying power.

    2. Re:No they shouldn't!! by sameerdesai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course you have a very limited view. It is said "you need to spend money to make money". You are totally unaware of how much space missions from ISRO has helping Indian Villages, etc. By making something that is very cost effective India can bag contracts from other countries to launch their vehicles, etc providing them revenue. You should not just see expenditure but "net gain".

    3. Re:No they shouldn't!! by swb · · Score: 1

      If launching space vehicles is so profitable, why are the only competitors involved government entities? Why doesn't Lockheed Martin or Boeing or British Aerospace or _______ have a commercial space launch business?

      The only thing profitable about space launch is being a contractor to the government entity doing the launches.

    4. Re:No they shouldn't!! by gunnk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Boeing DOES do commercial launches for whoever wants to hire them and does it with their own facility launching from the middle of the ocean. Is this something like that what you had in mind?

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    5. Re:No they shouldn't!! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      Why doesn't Lockheed Martin or Boeing or British Aerospace or _______ have a commercial space launch business?


      They do. Next complaint?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    6. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Sein · · Score: 2, Informative
      Obviously, you've never heard of SeaLaunch.

      http://www.sea-launch.com/organization.htm/

      Sea Launch is a limited liability corporation with Headquarters and Home Port facilities in Long Beach, Calif. The company is owned by Boeing of Seattle, Wash. (40%); RSC-Energia of Moscow, Russia (25%); Kvaerner ASA of Oslo, Norway (20%); and SDO Yuzhnoye/PO Yuzhmash of Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine (15%). Financing for the venture is provided by these companies and through debt financing arranged by Chase Manhattan Bank in New York.


      You were saying about Boeing and commercial space launch?
    7. Re:No they shouldn't!! by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      And who the hell do you think actually BUILDs the Space Shuttle and all the other equipment that NASA uses?

    8. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

      "You're an idiot if you compare USD to Rupee one for one."

      When did I ever compare USD and Rs. in my post?

      The point is much of India is in poverty and not just run-of-the-mill poverty but the most ass backward kind. India should be putting the money into projects that will have the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

    9. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

      "Of course you have a very limited view."

      And I'm sure your viewpoint is completely objective considering you work for ISRO and would stand to gain financially if this project goes forward.

      I'm not opposed to "spending money to make money" but the problem in this case is who is going to be making money?
      A very narrow segment of the population would benefit.

      If you spend the money on agricultural research and improving infrastructure a much larger segment of the population would benefit.

      Indians need:
      - clean drinking water
      - better roads
      - reliable electricity
      - jobs
      - homes

      Building roads, power stations, water wells and homes will create millions of jobs.

    10. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The average annual income in India is $450.

      When did I ever compare USD and Rs. in my post?

      Right there for one.

      India should be putting the money into projects that will have the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

      Look, I'd love to end world hunger. I'd also love it if the world didn't have to grind to a halt so that 100% of the population can spend 100% of its resources on the task. Face it, the problem doesn't interest 100% of the population and the people who are interested typically aren't interested to the tune of 100% of their money.
    11. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are asking Brahmins to have a heart? Get real pal.

    12. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, you are wrong. The brahmin babus have all the clean drinking water they need. Why should they worry about the lower castes? Its their karma to suffer after all.

    13. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're a stupid idiot and have no idea that ISRO http://www.isro.org/ is probably the only goverment space agency in the world making profit!!!

      and $450 is aprroximately Rs. 20,000 and you can live a decent life in a metro for that kind of money.

    14. Re:No they shouldn't!! by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

      I don't work there now. And besides the average pay of Scientist B is 15000 rupees and you get much higher wages in the private sector there. You should read what remote sensing satellites can do to find clean water, telemedicine. I agree politics is there but tell me where it isn't there. I agree we need to advance and I say this is one of those right steps.

    15. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

      "You should read what remote sensing satellites can do to find clean water"

      I'm very familiar with the technology. The problem is there are plenty of satellites to find clean water but no money to dig the wells.

      There is a big difference between sending up remote sensing satellites and sending up manned missions. I'm all for spending Billions of dollars or Rs. on scientific research but it should be focused on finding solutions to existing problems, not creating solutions to problems that don't exist. India doesn't need to put men in space. It needs to put it's people first.

    16. Re:No they shouldn't!! by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      RE: Indians need - jobs

      Dude, our CEOs are sending all the high paying jobs to you as fast as they physically can. If they were to spend any more hours a day doing it they'd have to cut out spending time on the links or in court defending themselves against insider trading, and they do not want to do the former and are compelled to do the latter.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    17. Re:No they shouldn't!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1 USD is ~ Rs. 48

      That's a lot of money and significantly higher buying power.


      Well, significantly higher buying power in significantly skewed areas. Food, for example is quite affordable. At 30Rs. for a decent-ish lunch in a city, that's significantly higher food buying power. However, anything coming from outside, especially tech, we're strapped in pretty hard. Which explains the state of Software piracy, for one, because the prices are the same worldwide, and it is a lot less fair for us than it is for the average American. Anything tech, in general, is a lot more tough for us to afford.

      And then again, there is hardware. While there has been significant improvements of late, it's not all that uncommon to see prices like this on the crazy end. (That's 8000$+ for a sub 2000$ laptop)

  66. Payload are 100 ton... 90 ton are grape squishies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need squishy for long journey! we give thanks for Apu for donation! Since squishies take up so much room we no have enough fuel to reach orbit.

  67. All the money in the world will not save the poor by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your comment is ignorant.

    You can can toss all the money you want and it will not fix the situation and possibly make it worse. The issue isn't the squalor they live in, for some of those people they don't see it as squalor. Many live as those who lived before them and it is by OUR standards that their living standards are not acceptable. You cannot buy them a new lifestyle. You cannot pay them to think and act differently.

    Sure spend some money, but also realize that the national pride will go a lot further for many Indians with a successful space program. It allows them to dismiss people who constantly call India "3rd world". Too many people see that country as "3rd world" while ignoring all they accomplished.

    Why do people mostly complain about DEMOCRATIC countries that do this but give a pass to China who not only throws a ton of money into their space race, their military, and such and at the same time likes to whack 5000+ of thier own people?

    India is progressing nicely, I don't think they need our Western standards to intefer with a job they are doing.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  68. How is it... by m.h.2 · · Score: 1

    That interesting stories like this are degraded to anti-American propaganda and the hateful jackasses who post garbage like the parent are modded Insightful?

    Attention mods! Put down the crack pipe before picking up the mouse.

  69. So .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where do they call for tech support, and will they be able to understand them?

  70. U.S. Has Been there, Done That!-)) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sour grapes!-))

    When India and China are on the moon, the U.S. and Japan will have robotized space and have humans on Mars. When India or China is on Mars, the U.S. will have spacecraft travelling to Alpha Centauri.

    So here's a big Bronx cheer to you!8~(!)

  71. Soon the west will be the developing nations... by nosr3t3p · · Score: 1

    Hopefully things like the Chinese and Indians planning manned missions will give the western world the kick in the ass it needs to start spending decent amounts of money on space. Otherwise, these 'developing' nations will have prime permanent bases, reaping the resources of the solar system, and having populations spread throughout the system. Meanwhile, western civilization stagnates back here on little old Earth because they were too worried about having a few astronauts die despite the fact they volunteered knowing the risks.

  72. here's how they can do it by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    They should outsource their space program to Boeing.

    "What labor deficit?"

  73. Re:Here's a q by parcifal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am actually quite sick of people branding people about whom they hardly know anything even in jest. Just as there are blues and reds in the US, there are a variety of people in India and equating India = turban is just advertising one's ignorance to the world.
    How would it be if one would say America = "duh"?

  74. Don't they have more important things to do? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I find it slightly disturbing that India is considering manned spaceflight at this point. I think there are other areas in that country that the money would be better spent on. India is developing at race pace, but there's still a lot of poverty.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Don't they have more important things to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will ALWAYS be poverty. If you eliminate all the poverty, someone just points to the new lowest point and declares that poverty.

    2. Re:Don't they have more important things to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should at the very least FEED your people first you heartless bastard.

  75. Re:its not it's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then there are gonna be people writing it as "zw'yx", "zwy'x", or "zwax".

  76. That's a great idea... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    The more Indian engineers in space, the less there will be back home stealing our jobs!!!

    (Because some are too think headed to have a sense of humor, I AM KIDDING!)

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  77. Re:All the money in the world will not save the po by venicebeach · · Score: 1, Informative

    The issue isn't the squalor they live in, for some of those people they don't see it as squalor. Many live as those who lived before them and it is by OUR standards that their living standards are not acceptable

    Your comment may apply to many rural villages where a simple yet poor life has continued for generations. However, there is also real squalor as well. Overpopulation combined with poor sanitation and rampant disease plague the sprawling slums of bombay, calcutta, etc. About 150 million people live in slums in India, and it hasn't always been like this. Bombay alone has over 4 million,/a>. That's why organizations like this one exist.

  78. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the next astronauts that get there will be in need of a corner shop and a good chicken tikka masala!

  79. Considering.... by Electric+Eye · · Score: 0, Troll

    ....that India has about a billion poor, illiterate and starving people -- not to mention an ancient infrastructure and horrible pollution -- I think the Indians can think of a few million BETTER ideas to waste money on. This is asinine.
    I've been there and seen the country, so I know what I am talking about.

    1. Re:Considering.... by subzero_ice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      on the same note considering US is a super power why does it need to put weapons in space?

      And you don't agree with Indian because a third world country is rising beyond its stereotypical image? There are a lot of problems in this world be it a third or a first world country, putting an end to the development of science is not an answer to that.
      And to your counter argrument that they are reinventing the wheel. well not everybody is cooperative enough to share their technology with the rest of the world. so countries like india have to restort to reinvention of the wheel.

    2. Re:Considering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's just so NICE of you to tell those poor ignorant Indians what they should do with their money.

    3. Re:Considering.... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From your post I can tell two things:

      1. You're ignorant. Sorry for being so blunt, but it's true.

      India might have a population of a billion, but they're not all "poor, illiterate and starving", far from it. As for things like "an ancient infrastructure and horrible pollution", well I have two words for you: Union Carbide.

      Seriously, put down Half-Life 2 for five minutes and read a book. Perhaps then you'll have a better understanding of the world beyond your own nation's borders. And perhaps you'd also appreciate that you don't even have to get a passport, or even get into a car, to see real abject poverty: I'm sure there are plenty of people living hand to mouth existences only a few miles from your doorstep.

      2. You have no appreciation for the benefits that technology can have for even the simplest people, or the role of technology in elevating people from poverty.

      Farmers benefiting from better weather forecasts is just one example of what I'm talking about. Solar panels providing electricity to even the remotest regions is another. Water filtration and recycling techniques are yet more.

      Sorry, but the only thing that's asinine here is your attitude. I've been there and seen the country too, so I know that you're talking out of your backside.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    4. Re:Considering.... by El · · Score: 1

      Seriously, put down Half-Life 2 for five minutes and read a book.

      You're new around here, aren't you? ;-)

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    5. Re:Considering.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a crock of cow dung. India's abject poverty is in no way comparable to anything found in America or anywhere else for that matter. Feed your people first you cruel jerk, before dreaming of fancy expensive adventures just so you can thump your puny chest.

    6. Re:Considering.... by Electric+Eye · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, as I said you idiot, I HAVE BEEN THERE. And, no, maybe not all of the people there are poor, but a majority of them are. You want to know how hard it was to even get a phone call out of there to the US? How about how long it took my lungs to recover from an 11-day trip? How about my plane being delayed for hours because of poor visibility...due to dense pollution in Mumbai?

      You try to pin me as this teeny-bopper cyber dork, but you're the ignorant one. I've seen a good portion of the country FIRST HAND, as I'm sure you certainly have not. Much of it was beautiful, but what had been touched by human hands had been virtually destroyed.

    7. Re:Considering.... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First of all, I did read that you'd been there: if you bothered to read my reply as well as I read your original comment you'd notice that I said that "I've been there and seen the country too", a clear acknowledgement of your claim.

      Poor is a relative term. Of course there are poor people in India, just as there are poor people in the US, in the UK, and everywhere else in the world. India certainly doesn't have a monopoly on poor, and it certainly doesn't have "about a billion poor, illiterate and starving people" as you claim. If nothing else, the number of technology jobs being moved their from the US and elsewhere should blow your argument out of the water.

      According to the CIA World Factbook, India has posted an average annual economic growth of 6 percent since 1990: see if you can find any other comparable nation that's making those sorts of strides. And the distribution of wealth isn't as bad as in, say, the US, with the bottom 10 percent of the population having 3.5 percent of the wealth (compared to 1.8 percent in the US). Life expectancy is rising just as it is in the West. Etc, etc. The idea that India is still a poor backward nation is just that, an idea, whereas the reality is very different.

      As I've said twice now, once in my original post, once again in the previous paragraphs, I've been to India too. The reality is that I've never had a problem phoning the West (maybe 20 years ago, but not now) and the infrastructure is visibly improving year on year. Pollution, the other issue that you mention, is hardly something that's specific to India either: I've experienced smog-filled days in the developed as well as the developing world.

      I've been to India several times. My last trip to India covered everywhere from the northernmost states down to Mumbai and then onto Bangalore, and lasted 13 weeks. My next one, scheduled for early next year, will cover New Delhi, Agra, Rajasthan, Gujurat, Mumbai, Goa and Kerala over six weeks. My hindi is a bit poor in places, but my gujurati is spot on, and I can converse with the average man in the street anywhere in the country without a problem. So, please, don't presume to tell me I'm the one who's ignorant about the Indian subcontinent. Because what you know about India that I don't probably isn't worth one fucking rupee.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  80. Not to be an ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but shouldn't taming outerspace be a project somewhere beloew taming one's own country on the old priority list? Starvation? Crime? Hello?

  81. India is on it's way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooner or later India will probably be a world power. I'd rather them be known for spending money on science and space exploration than other things like war...

  82. it's, its by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn it, can't you screen for it's/its usage on the main posts at least? it's no good to mis-educate millions of people a day.

  83. Pakistani ICBM versus Indian ICBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A Pakistani ICBM and here usually has an open cab (or at least an open window) so the driver can stay cool on those hot days. It also makes repairing tires easier.

    In contrast, on an Indian ICBM and here the open cab is difficult to maintain, and changing tires is simply impossible.

  84. bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad pointing this out is modded down as a troll here on slashdot.

    Must ... not ... upset ... slashdot groupthink.

  85. Re:Here's a q by king-manic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How would it be if one would say America = "duh"?

    To the rest fo the world, that statement seems very correct. You re-elected the same leader that brought economic decay and needless war.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  86. stay off my land!! by dougnaka · · Score: 1
    Just stay away from plot 535456, it's MINE! I have a deed!

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  87. I love competition by Dammital · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Doing it together" has brought us little more than diplomatic hassle, policy wars and engineering delays.

    The Race for Space was an expensive bugger, but it was also a time of great innovation.

    I welcome the Chinese, and the Indians, and the Japanese. Go Arianespace! Whose idea was it to replace two lumbering bureaucracies with a single humongous multinational lumbering bureaucracy?

  88. Uh-oh by nekoniku · · Score: 1

    Next we'll be outsourcing jobs to SPACE!

    --
    "It's a wonderful idea. But it doesn't work." -- Tad Danielewski
  89. What can they learn from it? by Madwand · · Score: 1

    What can they learn from it that we haven't already learned? They should concentrate on getting rich so they can buy the fruits of that research from us, rather than recapitulating what we've already done. This is a classic "build or buy" decision, and for them, their money is best spent reinvested in their own markets.

    1. Re:What can they learn from it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that WE haven't learned anything about spaceflight in the last 40 years, they still have lots they can learn.

  90. Bit of a racist debate this by mark2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nice to see so many techies falling back to racist sterotypes of Indians or worse (the person who made the comments about it being a shame that there were no visa restrictions to prevent Indians in space - I'm talking to you).

    How would people react if instead we were talking about Africans swinging from tree branches into space?

    I know I will get the typical idiot responses banging on about freedom of speech, but you know what? I don't care.... racism is racism is racism....

    1. Re:Bit of a racist debate this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How would people react if instead we were talking about Africans swinging from tree branches into space?

      Hmmm. Now are you talking about code monkeys here or just regular monkeys swinging from tree branches?
    2. Re:Bit of a racist debate this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree!

      But just who will the Indians outsource this to? Themselves!?

    3. Re:Bit of a racist debate this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Africans swinging from tree branches into space
      Heh. Now there's an image.

  91. Yeah I know!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only that but how in the HELL can those people pilot a spacecraft when they can't even drive a cab without crashing!!

  92. Not yet... by cloudless.net · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it really necessary for a developing country to spend the huge amount of money into the space program? And is it the right time to do it? Poverty is still a problem, and many children don't have the chance to go to school. Shouldn't the money be spent on improving education and helping the poor first?

    The money could also be spent on developing better infrastructures such as transportation, power and water supply. There are places with frequent power outage, and there are places without tap water. There are heavy pollution problems in major cities as well.

    The researches from the space program could be beneficial, however there are many other types of researches with more direct impacts. How about research for agricultural advances, to feed more hungry people? How about research for prevention and care for SARS? We might be able to find the answers in space, but with the same amount of money and effort, I believe we can make better progress researching on Earth now.

    With recent advances in computers and robotics, we don't have to send people into space. We can remotely control robots to do the dirty and risky tasks. Except for specific research of biological effect on the human body, there is no benefit of putting a real person into the spacecraft. It is much cheaper and more effective to have unmanned space mission, I suspect manned missions are just for the sake of national pride.

    The world can be a better place if we leave nationalism behind, and think collectively in terms on the whole mankind.

    1. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but your post makes just a bit too much sense. India wants to be just like the chest-thumping, soon to be totally fascist United States - let's waste the public dollar on bullshit "research" to help line the pockets of the wealthy and powerful. Meanwhile you pathetic poor fucks need to concentrate a bit more on "free-enterprise". All you little techno boot licking lemmings feel free to chime in...

    2. Re:Not yet... by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The world can be a better place if we leave nationalism behind, and think collectively in terms on the whole mankind.

      The world would also be a better place if we were all transformed into magical fairies with wings so that we could fly wherever we wanted to go. What's your point?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    3. Re:Not yet... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      His point was that he was proposing something at least potentially possible and sensible.

    4. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't.

  93. my completely insensitive idea by Raspberry · · Score: 1

    if I were india and China I would focus on getting people sent up into some rotating space station and then just blast people off in hundreds of thousands of cheap two to four man capsules...

    they could all be shot at a location on the moon or mars or where with parts to build some sustainable structures -- or perhaps even the capsules/pods/transports are made to be reusable as housing...

    I would figure if you can get the basics down and just make tons of transports the statistical odds are in your favor to have some limited BUT STILL successful attempts.

    It's not like China and India don't have people that would volunteer to get shot into space to the hope of getting out of the slums / starvation they currently face and will continue to face for generations.

    --
    ------------------------------
    Ray Raspberry
    raspberry@b3l33t.org
  94. firing people outta their country is a solution by Raspberry · · Score: 1

    maybe firing people into space is their solution to Starvation... Crime... although I'm not so sure about the solution to "Hello"

    --
    ------------------------------
    Ray Raspberry
    raspberry@b3l33t.org
  95. Maybe they should call Burt Rutan. by chopper749 · · Score: 1

    Governments in space. Humpf.

  96. Please do not offer my god a peanut by Cyburbia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rumor has it the first Indian space shuttle will be equipped with six robotic arms.

    1. Re:Please do not offer my god a peanut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG! You just made my friends list for that one. ROTFLMFAO!

  97. A long time ago when the Earth was green... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was more kinds of animals then you've ever seen! They'd run around free when the Earth was bein' born, but the lovliest of all was the Unicorn!

  98. Open source space rockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This being Slashdot, I wish to propose the invention of an open-source space rocket. I am an avid fan of space exploration so I welcome China's and India's attempts to send men into orbit - but it distresses me that they are all reinventing the same wheels in order to do so.


    Wouldn't it be better if they could all share rocket boosters and other designs making improvements where necessary, rather than inventing everything from scratch each time.

  99. Re:Faith, Family, and Values Will: +1, Patritoic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude you lost get over it
    That is how life works sometimes.

  100. Re:All the money in the world will not save the po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think these objections are raised partly because India still receives a great deal of foreign aid.

    "If they are landing on the moon," the argument runs, "why are we feeding their poor?".

  101. Re:Faith, Family, and Values Will: +1, Patritoic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Come on you liberal trolls. Had this been attacking Kerry it would have been moderated troll by now. Moderate parent appropriately.

  102. Actually.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost to launch the weight of an Indian into space is more than it would cost to feed him for a lifetime! So I guess a better way would be to dig a huge trench and just start droppin' them in and then bury them.

    1. Re:Actually.... by Raspberry · · Score: 1

      where did we need a land bridge?

      --
      ------------------------------
      Ray Raspberry
      raspberry@b3l33t.org
  103. OMG LOL africans swinging from branches! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    That is SOOO funny!! You're actually bein racist too but you pretend not to be by acting like you disagree with it! But I guess if you told n*ggers there was watermelon or BBQ chicken in space, I suppose they would manage to swing from trees into space....a n*gger will do anything for watermelon!! :-)

  104. Late night talks shows called harmful by Nexus7 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I mean, c'mon, you have a Slashdot OD, would it be too much to get your opinions from someplace other than a late night talk show?

    What effing good would eradicating illiteracy do to India if they're ruled by the Chinese, as in Tibet? It's strawman to begin with, because the Indians are debating whether or not to put a man on the moon, unlike Kennedy, who declared we would (to one up the CCCP, among other things).

    Besides, to address your silly lil' list:
    dysentery : India's already got the largest first class drug industry in the world; they're not the ones who are out of anthrax and flu vaccines

    literacy : They're not the ones teaching creationism (intelligent design) in school

    1. Re:Late night talks shows called harmful by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      China has not threatened India and is not going too anytime soon. Also the SUs, SSGN, and aircraft carriers are not for defending the country from an attack from china.
      What you did not seem to understand is I really do want India and anyone else to try and build manned spacecraft. I am just saying that before you worry about India waisting money on space flight over people that there are bigger things that you can complain about.

      I will have to say that your statments about the largest first class drug industry in the world is a statment that you can not prove. It may have one of the largest drug industries in the world but how many drugs do they develop, not just manufacture?

      Creationism not being taught in Indian schools? Want to bet? There are some extreme Hindu schools I believe private schools that are teaching raced base murder in the northern areas of India. I would bet they are teaching the Hindu creation story as well. India has it's fair share of sicko nut cases as does the US.
      Do not get me started on teaching evolution in the US. Frankly creationism has no place in a science class. I have looked at the science and it was all.... well no other way to put it but lies. I was invited by some friends to a creationism lecture and tried to go with an open mind but when he tried to tell me that there is no proof that c is a universal constant it was too much. I had to say in front of a few hundred people that was flat out wrong. Not to mention that they also said that Dinosauars where just lizards that got really big because before the flood everyting lived longer! I am a Christian and I know in my heart that you can never lie for Christ, kill for Christ, or hate for Christ. I know I will get flamed by the left for that statment but who cares.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Late night talks shows called harmful by stanmann · · Score: 1

      The evidence as it stands is that c is
      a) Not universal.
      b)decreasing, this may be due to increased accuracy in our measuring instruments or due to an actual decrease in c.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    3. Re:Late night talks shows called harmful by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      all evidence is that c is a constant in a vacuum allowing for gravitational distortions. It is more than constant enough to rule out stars several billion light years away being only 10,000 years old.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Late night talks shows called harmful by immerrath · · Score: 1

      Actually, as a Hindu and an Indian, I can say with some confidence that creationism is not taught in Indian schools. Its true that there are Hindu extremists just as there are Moslem and Christian extremists; and there are Hindu religious schools; but Hinduism, maybe because of how old it is, does not usually try to explain creation or to dispute science in this. There is a Hindu creationist theory and it has its own date, but Hindus are suprisingly able to separate their religion from their science. They will still tell you that the world was created by Brahma, but that doesnt affect the scientific view of things.

    5. Re:Late night talks shows called harmful by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      No insult was meant. Frankly if you go to BYU or Notre Dame they teach evolution as well. Actually I that thought the Hindu creation story was that it was the Dream of Brahma while he slept on a lotus. It has been a while. Just trying to point out that there are nuts everywhere and good and bad people everywhere. My comment was meant mainly to support the idea that India should build manned space craft it if wants to and that to damm them for not spending that tiny amount of money on the poor was miss directed. Complain about the military spending first. One of the big problems with India's military spending is that most of it is leaving the country instead of improving it's own technology base.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  105. Indian Space Program? by baadfood · · Score: 1
    Ah well, America will be able to outsource their space program now too.

    How do you spell "NASA" in hindi?

    1. Re:Indian Space Program? by svrider · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Na - Sa"

    2. Re:Indian Space Program? by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Informative

      ISRO.

  106. Outer space call centers? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    "Hello, this is [some corp]. How may I help you?"
    "Where are you located, India?"
    "No sir, we are at L5"

  107. Dang by kc8tad · · Score: 1

    Dang.. First they learn english and get names like ours. Second they steal half of our business.. now they want to have a manned space flight like us? Geez :P

  108. How quaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad to see that you're taking the initiative to tell those poor ignorant Indians what they should do with their money.

  109. What does the general slashdot crowd think ? by auburnate · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does the general slashdot crowd think of these space plans?"
    Out of this world!

  110. Re:Faith, Family, and Values Will: +1, Patritoic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't be American.. I mean, who in the States names their kid Kilgore?

  111. Costs Correction by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    My mistake: the cost of Apollo is about the same as the projected lifetime cost of the ISS ($100 billion "modern" dollars each). Mir is quoted at costing a bit more than $4 billion for its entire operating life.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    1. Re:Costs Correction by jthayden · · Score: 1

      Mir may have been reported to cost $4 billion, but how accurate is that? Under what sort of artificial pricing was this accomplished? I'd take that figure with a grain of salt, if not a whole salt mine.

  112. I know why they are going to the moon... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Its because the earth has already reached saturation point for qwik-e-marts.

  113. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just got an honorary MBA. Use it for the benefit of mankind. Or at atleast 1/6000000000th thereof.

  114. To sum it all up... by xot · · Score: 1

    What most of the posts essentially say is :
    1. India is re-inventing the wheel with manned space flights.
    2. India should put in money into infrastructure,starving people,poverty..
    3. India is stealing american jobs.
    Not 1 post(maybe 1) tries state reasons as to WHY India must be investing in Space programs at all?? Do you guys actually think that no one in the current Indian Govt or opposition must have thought that they'd rather invest in reducing poverty etc instead of Space programs?!.I am not jusifying their expenditure but just saying that there will be a good reason behind it.Besides there are specific norms as to what a developing nation needs to be.
    Also there are certain things that need to be re-invented.If there was 1 mission to Mars, do you think no one else would attempt to send a probe into MARS?
    And when it comes to stealing jobs, India is not stealing jobs but America is offering them jobs.If you call that stealing, ok. :-)
    Just my 2(3) cents.

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
    1. Re:To sum it all up... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      My guess is that India is spending large amounts of money to improve the perceived image of the country and get one-up on another country.

      This was exactly the same reason for JFK's space program in the 60's.

      It's my guess Pakistan will proably announce the same thing soon, too. ...except the big difference between the original US space program and the Indian one is that India aren't breaking new ground. I can't imagine that any really new science or technology will come from this, so it just becomes an ludicrously expensive PR exercise/publicity stunt.

      Unfortunately even that will backfire when the western newspapers carry a human-interest photo of some cute but dirty/starving Indian kids siting on a refuse pile while India's rocket takes off in the background.

    2. Re:To sum it all up... by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      2. India should put in money into infrastructure,starving people,poverty..

      India has enough starving people as it is. They don't need to be spending money on more.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
  115. Outsource by militiaMan · · Score: 0

    Maybe we should outsource the USA to India to save cost. That way Walmart prices will go down 90%. Although, income for the US citizens would go down 95%. Well at least the IT industry and manufacturing would not be unemployed by themselves. I think the Indian and Chinese moon missions will cost just as much the Apollo moon missions after adjusting for false exchange rates and reduced technology cost. When will US citizens with engineering, science, and manufacturing skills have increasing incomes? I have a feeling the USA will not occupy Mars until then, and will it be too late? I.E. will China, EU, and/or India claim Mars before we can? Or will it be like the Antartica under a multi country treaty? Will it have its own government?

  116. Re:Feed your people first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. I'm an Indian, and
      everytime I see a "technology is good" post from
      people who watch "60 minutes" or some report on
      CNN, I say "IGNORANT optimistic FOOL". I say
      the spending by any government should be aimed at
      helping the largest number of people at lowest
      cost. Better roads, better water supply systems,
      better schools, and a better food distribution
      system will help more people than will a space
      program.

    2. Someone on here said that a successful space
      program would enhance Indian national pride.
      I see no pride in having to import technology,
      know-how and knowledge.

    3. Most kids in India do aim to get into science.
      And most of them that do end up in science, end
      up in the US or other countries. Those that ARE
      left behind are insipid, uncreative people that'd
      rather plagiarize stuff off of google than come
      up with innovative solutions to problems.

    4. Corruption is still a big problem in India.
      And big money government projects like these are
      perfect targets for the beaurecrats and ministers
      to make amoral money.

    GRRR. BLAH!
  117. Misperceptions by enlight99 · · Score: 1

    There has lot beeb said about India being poor. That is, I think, the biggest reason they should try to develop affodable technology at home. They need high technology to improve the lives of their people. As far as Pakistan being a fundamentalist Islamic military dictatorship is concerned. At times there have been Generals ruling. They were far from being Islamic. Currently the General is very well educated and Westranized. There is and elected parliament and the Prime Minister lived in US for decades and was a VP at CitiBank. The elected parliament is very moderate. There is hardly any evidence of anything else. Some people have wrong perception and it only there perception and a man's perception is his reality.

  118. follow your own advice - shut NASA first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you scumerican fucks can't protect 2 buildings properly in NY and you wanna talk about space ? scumerica needs to stop funding nasa and start giving its firemen better training, and invest more in skyscraper architecture. what kind of a crappy design was that WTC, one fucking plane brought down each building!!! pathetic.

    what about democracy ? you screw up elections with excuses like pregnant chads (2000) and the DieBold CEO promising to deliver Ohio to Bush (2004)!! shut down nasa and invest in the election mechanism.

    or columbine - shut down nasa and invest in your own children.

    now it all makes sense to me .... the country has any problems, shut down the space program first - yeah that's so fucking brilliant. no wonder you fucks are bleeding jobs left, right and center.

    Q: Why did WTC happen in Sep ?
    A: Cos it was "fall" season.

  119. Indian ???nauts by BACbKA · · Score: 1

    Great idea, the more folks in space, the better. Mod all the stupid anti-indian-outsourcing jokers as flamebait and redundant, BTW. I wonder what will the Indian space mission participants be called? Cosmonauts, astronauts, taikonauts, now what?

    --

    VKh

  120. Everybody's doing it!!! by karrot · · Score: 1

    For the sake of nationalism, U.S. did it first and Russia never went for it, but now China and India want to fake going to the moon. Does every country with a camcorder have to have a manned space program?

  121. I guess the Auxilliary Power Unit... by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    really will be called Apu...

  122. You are asking too much from hindu brahmins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good compassionate and pragmatic thinking. But compassion and pragmatism are alien concepts to India's brahmins.

  123. Re:All the money in the world will not save the po by bani · · Score: 1

    of course with a population over 1 billion in a land area just over 1/3 the size of the US, they have quite different issues than the US does.

    india has roughly 25% of the population below the poverty line (compared to the US' 12%), but this is pretty good for a developing country. of course as you pointed out, much of that 25% may be subsistence farmers and/or simple villagers -- quite different from the US where such things dont really exist.

  124. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude you lost GET OVER IT!!!

    BTW being depressed is a big part of loseing..

  125. Re:Feed your people first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are one of the rare indians I have seen here. Almost all of them seem to care not at all for the starving masses of their pitiful nation. What is it about hinduism that makes you people such heartless bastards?

  126. Anybody... by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    Besides yours truly a raving Spider Robinson fan? Stardance, Starseed, Starmind... In space, nationality ceases to matter, and there's a *lot* more room out there than there is down here. I want to be a space colonist, and don't care what flag (if any) is painted on the ride that gets me there.

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  127. Mmmmm... freeze dried curry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Astronaut Space Food Curry and Nan... MMMMMMmmmmm

  128. Go Go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space will become increasingly important from a strategical view over the next decade. The more genuine republics that become space powers the better.

    Down with totalitarianism!
    (You know who I'm talking about....)

  129. Re:More Indian High Tech While the Masses Starve by stanmann · · Score: 1

    Note, that the SRB historically ranges from 1.2-1.5M to F. Males tend to have fatal accidents during their youth more frequently than females.

    So either by design or evolution more males are born than females.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  130. You are Wrong. Normal SRB = 1.05 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The normal sex ratio at birth is 1.05. You know not of what you bitch. The Indians, the Chinese, and the Koreans all share the same disgusting trait: SRB = 1.20. Japan, the USA, and Thailand all have an SRB of 1.05.

  131. Re:All the money in the world will not save the po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From whom? India has one of the largest foriegn currency reserves after Japan and China. It is self sufficient in food production and even exports a lot of it. What it does receive is loans from organizations such as World Bank or IMF for projects that pertain to infrastruture development. These are not handouts mind you. India has never defaulted on its loan obligations.

  132. Thank God.... by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Now I'll be able to get a big gulp as soon as I finish building this rocketship.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  133. Kwik E Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want to be the first country to orbit a convenience store.

    Thank you come again.

  134. Re:More Indian High Tech While the Masses Starve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>India is a failure because its culture is a failure

    India as a civilization has been around for more than 4000 years. It should have decayed and disappeared way back if its culture was a failure. Think about it.
    The country got its freedom only about 50 years back. Give it couple of decades and you will see the next big super power.

  135. India Will Move Teeming Masses to The Moon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to solve their population problem.

  136. oh my goodness! mr. simpson!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OHHH dammiittt!! I lose another customer!! He go out doors into vacuum of space before putting space suit back on!!

  137. This might be racist but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might be racist but as soon as I read this headline I pictured a 5 man space vessel with 32 Indians crammed into it....

    ha ha ha ha....

  138. Re:More Indian High Tech While the Masses Starve by AnnaSaru · · Score: 1

    India is a failure..
    because its culture is a failure

    Not sure what your point is here - how can anyone label *any* culture (or country ) in this world to be a failure.? !! But you do have a point in saying that it could be a waste of money.

  139. The more the merrier by payndz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The more countries who can get into space, the more chance there is that the people who get up there will look down and say, "Wow... That planet down there is really something special. We should take more care of it - and the race that got us up here to appreciate it."

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  140. India's Population - can't touch it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Union Carbide's Bhopal disaster reduced the population in India only slightly. Even if a potential Einstein was lost at Bhopal, the current birthrates guarantees that another one will be born to replace him in the next 15 minutes. So no, Bhopal wouldn't counter the effect of millions of Indian women pumping out 100's of future coders each hour.

    Perhaps Pakistan will have a stronger effect if they deliver their nukes, but somehow I doubt even that, since throwing both bombs would total to little effect!-))

    India and China have large populations and plentiful nuclear weapons. Since a war would improve their standards of living, perhaps something mutual could be arranged.

  141. human space exploration or not? by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    We all heard the reasoning for abolishing space-exploration (particulary human-based) before, and I think the major flaw in all these 'arguments' why we shouldn't go into space is that they always set economic factors as a premise.

    But, although economic viability is important to create a mass-usuage of space(travel), I fail to see why it should be the only possible motive to start exploring space. It's a pretty narrowminded, materialistic and typical capitalistic view on things. It's the same view that makes progress on medication for very rare diseases, or for diseases that are prevalent in continents that are poor, so slow: corporations can't see how they are ever going to get profit out of it, so they all turn their backs on it.

    If ppl (including states) are only going to do something when they are sure of an immediate profitable return, the world has become a sad place. (And we should leave it the sooner ;-)

    Arguments based on such a viewpoint fail to recognise other incentives apart from economical ones.

    The reason why we shouldn't (only) rely on robots? You can explore, but you can not colonise with robots. The will to explore is deeply entrenched in the human race, but with a reason: it has survival advantages.

    A species that doesn't colonise new territory and adapt, will perish. I think it's paramount that humans always keep their adventurage spirit and keep exploring and expanding, because the moment we will go "ah, let's sit back in our sofa's and let our robots/droids do it", we're basically finished, even when not being aware of it at that moment.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  142. Re:More Indian High Tech While the Masses Starve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India can stop spending money on defence, on once america stops funding arms to countries like pakistan.

    Btw, did you know that India is #1 in remote sensing ? this is as per Indian President Kalam.

    Culture ? nice bait.

  143. Fine by me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    so long as their misfires don't land in my back yard.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  144. First thing they'll do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing they'll do is look for a square planet so they can build a corner shop.

  145. Slurpees in Space..... by kernel+panic+attack · · Score: 1

    If this works out, it'll be great. Then the ISS crew won't have to land to stock up at a 7-11.

  146. Re:All the money in the world will not save the po by mre5565 · · Score: 1

    > India is progressing nicely, I don't think they need our Western standards to intefer with a job they are doing.

    Excellent. Then India can stop needing foreign aid
    too.

    If they can afford to subsidize space flight, they
    don't need aid from the treasuries of other
    countries.

    Indeed, they don't need aid from the charities
    I contribute too.

  147. Re:More Indian High Tech While the Masses Starve by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    Some cultures don't succeed as well as others. I wouldn't count India amongst the failures, though.

    Consider the Aztecs, on the other hand. Human sacrifice, institutionalized slavery... in the end, not even their cool calendars carved in stone made the Aztec culture truly viable. In the end, the Aztecs failed miserably.

    I note with sadness that the Arab culture has also passed quite a few hundred years without any notable successes.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  148. Re:I for one by xott · · Score: 1

    Flamebait??


    Racist Mods.

  149. Re:All the money in the world will not save the po by necrognome · · Score: 1
    Why do people mostly complain about DEMOCRATIC countries that do this but give a pass to China who not only throws a ton of money into their space race, their military, and such and at the same time likes to whack 5000+ of thier own people?


    Because China, unlike India, is more than hype. There's a lot of talk coming from India, but few accomplishments vs. China.
    --


    Let's get drunk and delete production data!
  150. U.S. does not need foreign labor - but it is cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    take the number of indians and chinese out of america today and see whats left of the once all might silicon valley..
    Studies have been done - Silicon Valley would be the same and the U.S. would be the same, but wages would be slightly higher. Fact is, the U.S. doesn't need foreign labor, it merely chooses to allow it. The U.S. would be fine, just as Europe is fine, if immigration stopped tomorrow (or 20 years ago, for that matter). In fact, the U.S. would be better off, because it is the U.S. that has educated the Chinese and Indians who now teach, work and compete with U.S. firms from their own countries.
    and to get the statistics straight... 30 % of employees in intel, and microsoft are indians..
    Because they are cheap labor, of course! U.S. firms can't resist!
  151. great... by CyberdogOSX · · Score: 1

    ...now they're sending my job into space

  152. Re:U.S. does not need foreign labor - but it is ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well in my opinion it wont be the same, as the indians and the chinese make the bulk of the workforce in the IT sector here in the US of A. If all the indians and chinese were to leave the silicon valley and head back home, almost all the companies would be in a dire situation as they combined make up almost 50-60% of the workforce. It will be fun to watch theem scrambling for inefficient US workers and on top of that pay them higher wages too. Secondly if these guys were to head home, it will lead to more outsourcing as they will go back and set up shops to compete with the US firms. thirdly, US will loose it tech supremacy as these guys are the ones fuelling it. Fourthly, the the amount of money these guys contribute to the US economy will be lost. hmmm.. why will anyone choose to allow something when it doesnt need that, for ex: why will US go to war against IRAQ over Afganistan, when the former didnt have any hand in 911. I guess it didnt need the war but still it chose it, because it was gaining something from it. Maybe the US people didnt gain much, but I am sure big corporations and those in the senate did. People allow things when they have a need for it.

  153. iBook back light! by stanley_odd · · Score: 1

    Hi there, I'm a technician for Napier University and have just read your post from January regarding the repair to an iBook back-light. I have a student's G3 iBook with the same problem - definitely the video chip. Could you possibly give me some more info as to where you permanently pulled up the control signal of the backlight? Any help much appreciated, thanks Stanley

    1. Re:iBook back light! by mean+pun · · Score: 1
      Sorry everyone for the off-topic posting, but this is a mission of mercy: saving an iBook! :-)

      All this is from memory. I opened the LCD compartment (not the main unit), and soldered a pullup resistor directly on the surface-mount wires of a connector on a PCB in there. That connector receives the wireloom that passes through the hinge. One side of the resistor goes to the +, which is on one extreme end of the connector, and the other side of the resistor goes to the pin that carries the PWM signal for the backlight intensity. As far as I remember it is the second pin counting from the other side of the connector. A standard miniature axial resistor, with one of its wires bent back, fits the required pitch quite naturally.

      Again, all this is from memory, so you'd better check. And the repair is a pretty desparate one. I remember that for a few days I could still dim the backlight if the iBook was in the right mood, but then it got stuck on maximal forever, so I've probably blown the output of the video chip with this repair. (But it's better than stuck on minimal, which was what happened without the repair.)

      Oh, and the resistor was something like 33K, but that's probably not very critical.

      Anyway, good luck.

    2. Re:iBook back light! by stanley_odd · · Score: 1

      Hey there, Thanks very much for the information, I'll let you know how it pans out! Aplologies to all for interrupting the thread, I'm new to this and didn't know how else to get in touch re the iBook. Thanks again, peace.

    3. Re:iBook back light! by stanley_odd · · Score: 1

      Hi again, We have total success! The fix worked just as you said, the pins were different and we had to use a 2k2 resistor as 33k was too dim - hasn't caught fire yet. Thanks again for your assistance - we would never have known where to begin with this. Superb! Cheers Stan

  154. huh? by edittard · · Score: 0
    has acknowledged it's technological preparedness
    Acknowledged it is technological preparedness? What is?
    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  155. Re:More Indian High Tech While the Masses Starve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the aztecs culture didn't fail buddy... they were royally fucked by the spanish

  156. Re:Here's a q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Focus on your own country dipshit.