Slashdot Mirror


Tax Time Again: Any Linux Solutions?

vettemph writes "As a Linux user, I've used Intuit's Turbo Tax On The Web in the past, but I don't like paying someone $20 to $30 to submit my forms. For the last few years I've been filling out the forms by hand and mailing them for $0.37 instead. Call me cheap. The IRS has a target of 80% of all taxpayers using e-file in the near future. Does anyone know where the 'free and open' solution is? Do we need to petition the IRS? Currently the IRS seems to be protecting their 'approved e-file partners'' profit margins in the name of a security layer. (I call shenanigans!)" So how will you be doing this year's taxes? I'd settle for a good PDF editor to neatly complete the IRS's PDF forms.

751 comments

  1. If you're not paying the Microsoft Tax anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why stop there?

  2. Re:I posit a dichotomy by djsmiley · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just answer the damn question?

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  3. www.taxfreedom.com by WatcherXP · · Score: 0

    www.taxfreedom.com Free filing baby! (unless you are rich, then don't bitch)

    --
    09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
    1. Re:www.taxfreedom.com by yasth · · Score: 1

      Or the official IRS (not just intuit) http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=118986,00.h tml

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    2. Re:www.taxfreedom.com by WatcherXP · · Score: 0

      Yerp, that's correct, but that wasn't the question. Question was asking how will I be filing my taxes.

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
  4. Turbo Tax, AGAIN by ScottyKUtah · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just bought the Turbo Tax Deluxe from the local Sam's Club. Decent price, and I'll have my taxes done by the end of the weekend. The only thing that burns me is the "electronic filing fees". Just call them what they are (profit) and be done with it.

    --
    He who laughs last is at 300 baud.
    1. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I think I am the only person who likes to pay $100 for the H&R block service. I used to do Turbo tax too, but my returns were never remotely close to the H&R block service. They make recommendations that I would never dig up in a million years.

    2. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by bryanthompson · · Score: 1

      I agree completely... I've used H&R for the last 4 years. They always find things I wouldn't have, and if you consistantly go to the same person, it builds up a decent relationship. Definitely makes tax time less sucky.

      I don't even know what it costs to go there... I just take my stuff, and if there's a refund I have their charge come out of it.

    3. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by matth · · Score: 1

      Same here.. I payed $75 last year.. it's nice to have them to go back on too.

    4. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by mslinux · · Score: 1

      You mean you have to pay over and above the price of the software to file electronically? Is it better to just buy the basic edition (19.99) or the deluxe edition (49.99)?

      Thanks!!!

    5. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by tftp · · Score: 1

      You are not the only one. For me it is much more comfortable to just bring all the papers to them and have them do all the work. It is not worth my time to learn a trade of tax preparer for mere $75 or whatever they charge for a simple return. Besides, if I make a mistake I may end up paying more in late fees than I saved.

    6. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by kotj.mf · · Score: 1

      YADitto.

      I've had a few Sierra Nevadas in me, so I can't remember the name of the other place that's not H&RB, but I took my taxes to them last year. I was a part time student, working full time, taking out about $5k in student loans, and grossing ~$25k.

      When I ran it myself, I ended up with about $2k in federal refunds. When they did it, it came out to about $2500. Well worth the $125 I paid them.

      I got married in March, and my wife has significant medical expenses, so you can bet your sweet ass I'm gonna pay them to do it. Though $250 is the difference between having a ne iRiver and not having a new iRiver, it's also the difference between getting audited and not getting audited.

      --
      hang brain.
    7. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Buy the Deluxe edition. It includes one free* state version and one free* e-filing. You can also get $30* off a version of Quicken if you buy it along with TurboTax. I've also seen special deals for everything from free music CDs, firewalls*, anti-virus programs*, etc., when you buy them along with TurboTax.

      * after rebates

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by the-banker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Keep in mind that although H&R Block may say they will accompany you to an audit, they are in no way responsible if they screw up. Tax law specifically states that liability for filing errors are the filer's responsibility unless the return is prepared by a Certified Pubilc Acct. You will notice that H&RB (and Hewitt, et al.) will call themselves "Certified Tax Preparers" or some such nonsense.

      Bottom line is that if they screw up, it is YOUR ass, not theirs. If you use a CPA, then you still have to pay the tax on any mistakes, but penalties, criminal charges, etc. are on the CPA, not you.

      Not saying that they don't provide a valuable service, but make sure the person you are dealing with is knowledgeable and understands how much risk you are willing to take.

    9. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Equinox11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are getting money back then you should adjust your deductions so that doesn't happen.. Money should sit in your account rather than theirs.

      With that in place since it's often extra to E-File just send the dead trees.. It's more of a pain for them to process it, and that gives them less time to find anything wrong with it.

    10. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      Two years ago I had bought a home and wasn't sure how to handle m y taxes so I stopped into H&R Block. The guy I talked to spent 5 minutes explaining what I needed to do and advised me to file them myself and save the money.
      Ever since then, I have religiously purchased TaxCut from H&R Block to do my taxes and I always will. Even if it means keeping a Windows partition to use once per year.
      I will never touch TurboTax given Quicken's attitude that my computer is their's to do with as they please.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    11. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by boisepunk · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that the cost of Turbotax is it self tax deductable (tax preperation expenses).

      --
      main(0)
    12. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by sasami · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My tax preparer also does a great job on my yearly return. But he provided a much more important service one year: when the IRS made a mistake, there was nearly nothing I could do about it on my own. The government came close to freezing my assets, and they stalled for 8 months before admitting the error.

      (It's said that stalling is an unstated IRS policy; the hope is that you'll give up and let them have the money.)

      Find a local tax accountant and develop a relationship. That one incident would've cost me two lifetimes' worth of professional tax preparation.

      --
      Dum de dum.

      --
      Freedom is not the license to do what we like, it is the power to do what we ought.
    13. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I'm still amazed how greedy the government is sometimes... Threatening to freeze your assets and causing all that headache? For what, maybe at most a few $thousand? Which is like a drop in the ocean compared to the amount of money the government deals with on a daily basis?

      Sometimes I think the government spends more than $50 trying to get you to pay that extra $50 they think you owe them. It just doesn't make sense...

      -Z

    14. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by koreaman · · Score: 1

      You may be right, but I think H&R Block are less likely to screw up than you are, so you actually decrease your liability.

    15. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by hazem · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it's true, because I can't find a source, but I heard once that it costs the IRS nearly 50% of the revenue they collect to do their job. That seems like a pretty crappy margin to me.

    16. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that depends upon how complex your taxes are and how much you know about "finding things". H&R block will probably know lots of deductions and ways to get you more money - and you can only hope that they don't mess up there. If your taxes are simple I'd say you have just as good of a chance of doing your taxes as they do. Probably more since you actually care about YOUR taxes.

    17. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by jnhtx · · Score: 5, Informative
      make sure the person you are dealing with is knowledgeable and understands how much risk you are willing to take. Excellent advice.

      Four years ago I bought a Jackson Hewitt tax franchise as a hedge against the day when I'm too old to program. I'm 52, work full time as a C++ programmer, and haven't been laid off yet!

      I'm not sure about H&R, but as part of our basic price we promise to pay any interest and penalities that occur if we make a mistake. In addition, for a small charge the client can extend that coverage to include up to $5000 in additional taxes that might be levied.

      Tax filings are the taxpayers responsiblity even if God himself prepared the return. I'm sure a CPA prepared Al Capone's return, but Big Al is the one who went to jail.

      You will notice that H&RB (and Hewitt, et al.) will call themselves "Certified Tax Preparers" or some such nonsense.

      I pass a difficult exam (based on the tax portion of the CPA exam)in order to qualify as an Enrolled Agent which gives me the right to represent clients in audits and in tax court on identical basis as attorneys and CPAs. Of course EA have identical responsibilities with our attorney and CPA friends. See IRS circular 230.

      Most Jackson Hewitts have an EA or CPA available to represent client in audits.

      All you folks doing the free returns, when you get the letter from the IRS this summer let me help you get amend your return to get you out of trouble.

    18. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Some years ago, David Brinkley for ABC News Sunday show said he had to write a check for $0.18 for a tax bill he got from the IRS and used a $0.32 stamp to mail it.

      While it's good to see the government going after every penny owed, that's crazy.

    19. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sasami:
      You do realize that the IRS cannot take anything without a court order, right?
      They get away with it because people don't fight it... (sigh).

    20. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Wow! So you did something useful with all that dotCom money, eh? Kudos to you. I bet a lot of the other Slashies that spent all their money on Jags and BMWs wish that they had invested in their futures, like you did.

    21. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Eccles · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you use a CPA, then you still have to pay the tax on any mistakes

      Ok, so if they overclaim, you actually have to pay the right amount after all. Doesn't sound too horrible to me.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    22. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just some clarification - from a CPA with a masters degree in taxation - the tax return is ALWAYS the responsibility of the taxpayer regardless of who prepares it. However there are cases (not too uncommon) where a taxpayer is relieved of criminal wrong-doing by relying of "compentent" professional advice. But if you lie to your tax preparer you pay the tax and go to jail if the lie is big enough. But on the more practical side most undivorced reasonably compensated taxpayers have only 4 deductions left as a practical matter - mortgage interest, state and local income OR sales taxes (sales tax new this year (kinda)), property taxes and charitable deductions. You may qualify for medical deductions but not unless you feel like you're going broke paying them. If you're destitute and have kids you may qualify for the earened income credit and alimony is deductible if you're paying it. Otherwise if you are an outside salesman (person) or drive alot for your employer without being paid mileage you may have some other deductions available. Is this quick description all encompassing - not by any means. But most folks can do their own taxes if they just would.

    23. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A number of people have mentioned H&R block finding additional deductions they wouldn't have thought of on their own. Anyone care to be specific?

      The reason I ask is that I've always done my own taxes, either by hand (way back when) or with TurboTax or TaxAct. My tax situtation isn't overly complicated but isn't overly simple either (mortgage, small business, investments, etc).

      I've never felt like the tax code was too complicated for me to find deductions I was entitled to. All the tax programs ask you specific questions related to all areas where you might find deductions. I'm just wondering what are these elusive deductions that H&R block is able to find that couldn't be found with a little bit of homework.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    24. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1

      When I used H&R Block Premium a couple of years ago, they made a slight mistake. However, they paid the penalty, they paid the outstanding tax owed to NY State, *and* they gave me some cash as compensation (on the basis I wouldn't sue, of course).

    25. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if it exceeds the threshold of 2% of my income then I get a portion of the cost (based on my tax bracket) back?

      Sounds like a deal! Now I just need to have my income cut to below $2500. Wait a minute, then my tax bracket will be zero. D'oh!

    26. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Marvelicious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're going to pay someone to do your taxes, I'd avise checking local papers, etc. to find someone other than H&R Shaft er Block. I get mine done by the same person every year, the difference is she is motivated by the fact that the money I pay her is HERS, rather than H&R Block's. Trust me, I've done the Pepsi challenge with this and it is worth it. "If there's a refund..." HA HA HA sucker! 'Course working on the road does make for a lot of write-offs...

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
    27. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Squareball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is what I'll be doing this year but I hope to god that next year we can start something new and not have to worry about this any more.

    28. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by WesG · · Score: 1

      JUst curious - does H&R round to the nearest dollar.

      I didn't realize it, but I heard you can round to the nearest dollar and ignore the cents.

      Anyone else do this?

    29. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      That was good of him. Most people have the wherewithal to do their own taxes - but it doesn't take too many "extras" to make the returns much, much more complicated.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    30. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by iocat · · Score: 1
      The nice thing about H&R Block or a local preparer, is that they'll typically indemnify you against mistakes (assuming you don't lie to them), and represent you if you're audited. They can also save you *much* more money than an automated program. Even though they basically use an automated program themselves, if they are competant, they have a great knowledge of tax laws.

      Beware of H&R seasonal employees though, you want someone who is there 12 months a year. Before I found a great independent, I would drive 1+ hour to go to a permanent H&R location to ensure I got a permanent employee.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    31. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      That might be 50% of what they collect in audits. The US federal government is inefficient - but not that inefficient :)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    32. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by wplittle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am all for replacing the current taxation setup with something better - however, I don't think that the "FairTax" is the right approach.

      One of the things I remember from economics courses I took in college a few years back was that taxation tied to sales of goods and/or services is a regressive tax - that is, if the sales tax on a $12 item is $1 (which is approximately what it would be here in Los Angeles), the $1 is a bigger percentage of a poor person's income than it would be of a rich persons. This makes the tax burden higher for the poor than it is for the rich. That doesn't seem like a sound policy to me - even though the proponents of such a tax suggest a rebate to those at the poverty line or lower, what happens to those who are only slightly above the poverty line? The poverty line's accuracy is also determined by geography - $10k a year goes a lot farther in the midwest than it does in Southern California.

      That's not to say that the other way around - which is in theory how we are currently operating, but not in actuality - isn't fair either. Having taxation tied to how much you make is a disincentive to making more (theoretically). Why should someone be penalized (through higher taxes) for making a good living? Isn't the idea of a capitalist system to make as much as you can?

      Flat tax makes the most sense of income taxes - even though I still don't like it (I don't think income tax should exist at all). Oh yeah, and encourage reduction in spending at the federal level (ok...you can mod this as "Funny"). Governor Schwartzenegger's State of the State address had a lot of good points - let's hope he can take it beyond mere words.

    33. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      It's in the instructions that come with the tax forms. I'm not sure if you can round every line in your calculation, but you can round the final result.
      Go to irs.gov and grab the 1040 instructions pdf, search for rounding.

    34. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Jackson Hewitt?

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    35. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Beyond the standard mortgage, property & state taxes, and charitable contributions, you can deduct:
      * Gambling losses (add up all those state lottery tickets)
      * Losses on investments (you can only deduct actual "realized" losses, i.e., after you sold stock. But don't forget to account for realized gains also.)
      * Some medical expenses -- this is somewhat limited
      * Casualty losses -- theft, fire
      * Union dues.
      * Out of pocket work expenses -- be careful on this, for example if you bought a new computer & dsl connection and use it for work only part time, you won't be able to deduct the full amount. But if the job requires you to have it and they don't pay for it, then you may be able to deduct it (check the tax instruction booklet). More common is things like company uniforms, business lunches, etc.
      Note that you get a "standard" deduction of a few thousand dollars. You can either take that deduction of the total from items such as in the above list, but not both. So if you add up everything and it comes up to be less than your standard decution, then the standard is all you get.
      Download the pdf instructions for form 1040 from irs.gov (not 1040a), and look for the instructions for Schedules A & B. Also do a google search for "common tax deductions" and see what applies.

    36. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      In high school, I had an economics teacher tell me this. She claimed it is better for you to get it, and let it draw intrest in your bank, than to give it to the IRS as an intrest free loan.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    37. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by mbrother · · Score: 1

      I had the same attitude as you did a couple of years ago, and bought TaxCut. It sucked. I moved from one state to another, and it just plain couldn't handle it correctly (and boy did I try to make it but my fixes invalidated efiling). I went back to TurboTax, but switched to their on-line system. They did drop the snooping software after they lost business over it.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
    38. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      A number of people have mentioned H&R block finding additional deductions they wouldn't have thought of on their own. Anyone care to be specific?

      The first year we started using an accountant, we had prepared our own taxes. On the emphatic recommendation of a business associate, we went to a very conservative tax accountant.

      His charge was $750, and for that, he cut our taxes by a a few thousand. I've never looked back, and I'm well aware of the fact that our accuntant tends to be rather conservative. I know a guy who spends more on repairs for his several Mercedes cars than he legally makes in income!

      Really, and truly - especially if you run your own business - a good accountant and a good attorney are some of your very best friends! If they are any good, they'll save you thousands - (or, if you read my earlier post, qualify you for things you otherwise would completely miss!)

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    39. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by jdbear · · Score: 1

      the FairTax would be regressive, and would hurt poor people, if it was simply a tax on everything you buy. The truth is a little more complex (just as our system isn't simply a tax on income.)
      The lower income people will not have to pay any tax, or very little, in the current proposal because the Government will advance them the equivalent of the taxes they would have to pay for taxes up to the poverty line.

      In other words, at the beginning of the month, Joe Paycheck will receieve all of the money he would be expected to pay for taxes all month for the basic neccessities of living. For a single person, no kids, this would be based on about $8000, or around $153.00. For a family of four, that's $460.00 per month.

      That makes a family of four with an income of $35000 per year actually pay only about $2500 in taxes, or have about a 7% tax rate. That 7% is LESS than the money that's taken out of their paycheck for FICA today, so in reality, all other things being equal, they pay MUCH LESS in taxes compared to today's system.

      Because only new retail items are taxed, those who are not spending a large percentage of their income at retail don't pay a large percentage of their income in taxes, see?

      It works because lower income folks (those making less than $50,000 - $70,000 per year) most of their tax burden forgiven, while higher wage earners do not benefit so much from the breaks. This is the way our current system is supposed to work, but often fails.

      The hidden benefits of the system are that it encourages savings, removes the complexities of the system that allow for corruption and waste, and collects large amounts of money from the underground markets, where no taxes are currently being collected.

      No one need ever be fined or go to jail again for hiring a day laborer or maid and paying that person "under the table." We can hire people at will, negotiate a wage that is agreeable to both parties and pay cash without the government ever needing to be involved. The taxes get paid when that worker buys lunch at McDonalds or gets clothes at Walmart.

      If a drug dealer sells cocaine for $2000, then uses the money to buy a nice new watch, the taxes get paid (as long as he buys it from a store. Stolen goods will still be outside the tax revenue stream, but that's no surprise.)

      High rollers, like movie stars and business tycoons who spend money like water will still buy whatever they want, and they will still end up paying lots of money in taxes. They will buy EVERYTHING at retail, with the taxes accepted as part of the bill. Truly poor folks might buy a used car instead of a new one, saving the tax money. They might even shop in Thrift Stores (like they do now) which will be essentially tax free zones (because they are not new retail.)

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
    40. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but their screwups can bite you in the ass big time. A buddy of mine in Montreal paid H&R Block 2 years ago to prepare his return.
      They filed it with the Province of Quebec and never gave him back any documents. The Revenue office audits him, he asks H&R Block for his documents and gets bupkes.
      Why? They closed the office he originally dealt with and no-one knows or can find where the documents from that office are.
      Since he nothing to contest the auditor's disallowing employment related expenses ( former employer went bankrupt ), he's now $3000 out of pocket.

      I'll stick to doing my own, as I have since the age of 16, thank you very much.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    41. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by japhmi · · Score: 1

      What? You actually are willing to pay for TurboTax.

      Every year, I get it for $0 after rebate (basic edition). It helps that my state taxes are so simple, that it takes about 5 min after I print out my 1040.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    42. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Misch · · Score: 1

      IANA-Financial Advisor... but if you're going to have large medical expenses, consider getting a Flexible Healthcare Account or one of the new Health Care Savings accounts. Although you'll only be able to pay medical bills with the money, you'll be paying with money pre-tax rather than post-tax. (Flex Spending Accounts are use-it-or-lose-it, and have a limit.)

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    43. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      isn't fair either. Having taxation tied to how much you make is a disincentive to making more (theoretically).

      I realize you are just playing devils advocate, but jesus h christ. The fact that you even have to play lip service to such a retarded idea just boggles my mind.

    44. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      Except the borders play havoc with this. Suppose I'm rich. I can buy a car in Canada, or I can buy it in New York. One place I pay a big FairTax, the other I don't. Congratulations. You've killed big-ticket retail near the border. Also, for the rich, a tax on spending would cripple the economy, as prices would take a large jump due to this. Finally, the paycheck from the government seems like a nice idea, but it still hurts. A progressive tax on income works, but our definition of income is now riddled with incentives for certain actions (i.e. home-buying, holding stock [why IS the CG tax less than the income tax, anyway?], and even more for businesses).

    45. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Don't know if you've been watching TV lately, but Intuit has been guaranteeing their results for 3 or 4 years now. Since I've never had issues with my taxes, I've never had occasion to use the feature. Anyone out there get burned by Turbotax?

    46. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Your friend should have had all the documents, and never have given up originals. With original documents, you don't need the original tax returns, so I'd say your buddy screwed himself.

      Common sense, people.

      3 years of using Turbotax web, and 8 years of Turbotax before that. 1 year of H&R Block, and I wasn't impressed.

    47. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Which are only useful if your medical expenses are under the magic 18% of gross income you need in order to deduct them. Otherwise, it doesn't matter.
      pre-tax, post-tax, it's still money in your pocket, just money that you didn't have to loan the government interest free.

    48. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Or how much money they'll spend in labor and paperwork just to freeze and collect those assets? And how much they'll end up paying once your bankrupt and/or on the public dole because you no longer have a house and cannot get a job?

      Remember: government is nothing but legions of people on their own individual power trips who think they know what's best for you.

      Which is why I so love anarchy. At least then you know the universe truly is chaos and everyone's out for themselves.

    49. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by wannasleep · · Score: 1

      I agree with that. I do my tax returns by hand, and then fill in the PDF forms. I used a CPA for two years and figured out that (in my case) I don't need one.I went through all the instructions and learnt a lot of stuff that way.
      However, if you have stock options, very diversified investments, etc. you may want to consider the advice of a CPA, well before you do your taxes, as it will allow you to save a lot by simply doing the right thing.

    50. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by jcenters · · Score: 1

      Well, it's quite simple, and it's the same reason why some drug dealers go after clients who try to go clean, or mobsters who breaks a storeowner's legs if he doesn't pay his "protection money."

      If the IRS let a SINGLE CASE slip, then others might stop being afraid and the slippery slope arguement comes into play.

      Let's face it, the IRS is feared by most Americans, and it's no accident. The government HAS to have that money, and they will do whatever it takes to get it.

      Heh, and a large chunk of the money goes to fight a "War on Terrorism." Sorry, but you have to love the irony.

      Also, you have to consider that the Feds use the income tax as far more than just income. The income tax is instrumental in running down organized crime, as well as a convenient social tool (Drive a hybrid car, get $x more refund). The income tax gives the federal octupus extra tentacles to control the American people.

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    51. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bottom third of income range in the US is responsible for 0.5% of the total tax revenue. I've always wondered why we bother collecting it.

      My favorite idea is to set some arbritrary line, relative to local cost of living and dependent status, that measures the minimum required monies to live a basic, no-frills lifestyle... food, shelter, clothing, transportation, and health care only. I'm not sure what defines the official "poverty line", so call this something else if necessary. Income up to the line is tax free. Any additional income above the line is taxed at a flat rate.

      There are some reasonable complaints regarding a local cost-of-living tax break on a nation level, as $25K in Arkansas would pay more than $30K in Harlem, so an alternative would be to set the COLA factor to the 95th percentile. This would allow someone earning a minimum living wage to live tax-free in Queens, but not Bel-Air.

    52. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens. I got a small raise once and it was just enough to kick me into a higher tax bracket. I made *less* money the next year because of that raise.

    53. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be very unlikely. The price of goods that you purchase have an embedded tax in them of about 20%. Prices would be expected to go down by that 20% so what you spent a dollar on before is now 80 cents. Adding a 20% sales tax on to that would bring the total to 96 cents. the price you pay will be the same or lower. Why would you go to Canada a pay more for the car?

    54. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      What about the time taken to read comments on this Slashdot article? That should be deductible too, as people are researching the best ways to file their return. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    55. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "I got a small raise once and it was just enough to kick me into a higher tax bracket. I made *less* money the next year because of that raise."

      BS. You only pay a higher % on the new money above the threshold, not on everything. Say the new bracket kicks in at $25,001, where it switches between 15% and 20%. If one year you make $25,000, you pay $3750 (net income = $21,250). If you then make $27,000 the next year, you pay ($25,000)*0.15 + ($2,000)*0.20 = $4,150 (net income = $22,850). Your net income still went up by $1,600 when you increased your gross by $2,000.

      If you're going to lie, lie convincingly. Or get a decent tax accountant, whichever your case may be.

    56. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1
      Truly poor folks might buy a used car instead of a new one, saving the tax money.


      This must vary state by state; here in PA you pay the regular 6% sales tax when you buy a used car, even from a private party. You basically tell the notary/auto tag place what the sale price was (so you can fudge it a bit) and they collect the tax amount and send it into the state.

    57. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

      If you want to be 'in the loop', a good way to do that is through community tax preparation volunteering. I don't know how other countries do it, but in Canada, i just said I was interested, they gave me a free intensive course on tax preparation, and I learned all the nifty loopholes. The only string was I spent a few Saturday afternoons doing tax returns for disadvantaged/low-income people (who generally have very easy returns, often taking under 10 minutes to fully complete and netfile). The advantage of this approach is, you get the free tax training, straight from the horses mouth, and you get to help in your community a bit. I only did it the one year, mostly for the training to use on my own taxes, but it was an invaluable experience.

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    58. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by legojenn · · Score: 1
      Bottom line is that if they screw up, it is YOUR ass, not theirs. If you use a CPA, then you still have to pay the tax on any mistakes, but penalties, criminal charges, etc. are on the CPA, not you.

      What you are describing sounds like the tort of negligent misrepresentation, though not being a lawyer, you would be crazy to follow my advice and not being a psychiatrist, you would be foolish to trust my diagnosis. From what I understand, if the advice of an individual or organisation as can be reasonably trusted ie through someone's title, certification or position within an organisation, then you can seek redress for what happens to you based on their advice or instruction.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    59. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prices go down by 20%? Dream on, brother. Prices would only go down if they were tied to costs. You have to be living in another world to belive that! All you'd do with your fairtax is increase corporation's profit margins, that'll be end up being distributed to shareholders and executives. More money to the rich, the poor get shafted... I'm sorry, that's not the America I want to live in

    60. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by keyslammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would love to see something like fairtax or a flat tax replace our current tax system, but I don't hold out much hope for it. From a political perspective, producing "tweaks" in the tax code is a great way for our representatives to pander to special interest groups. Plus, there are a lot of people for whom the current tax code is their bread & butter - the IRS, H&R Block and many independent accountants. Such a bill would face some serious opposition.

      Even if such a broad, sweeping reform were made, I fully expect that by the next year, our politicians would introduce special exception cases to benefit politically powerful groups. :-(

    61. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      Think about this (up-front warning, this is off-topic):

      Fair Tax is partly about simplification, which I'm all for, but it's mainly about redistribution of the tax burden.

      The fact is that no one wants to pay taxes, but as long as our government spends money, SOMEONE has to. Under Fair Tax, some people are going to pay less taxes than they are now, and necessarily, some people are going to pay more. Yes, I know that the Fair Tax advocates want you to believe that EVERYONE will pay less taxes, but this is mathematically impossible, and I'm assuming that anyone reading this will realize what a facetious claim this is.

      So which group will you fall in under Fair Tax, the pay-mores or the pay-lesses?

      Well, if you're rich, you'll pay less because of a multitude of reasons: 1) the new Fair Tax rate will be less than your former marginal income tax rate, 2) the alternative minimum tax, the capital gains tax, the dividends tax, the estate tax--all of which almost solely benefit rich people, will be abolished, 3) rich people tend to not have to spend all of their money, and money that you invest (except in tangible goods, of course) will not be taxed at all, etc., etc., etc. If a rich person dies with a few million in the bank, that's a few million that they NEVER paid tax on.

      If you're dirt poor, you might pay a LITTLE less because you'll be getting a tax refund that basically zeroes out the Fair Tax that you pay on the food, clothing, and shelter that you buy, but since most poor people don't pay any taxes now, most poor people will pay no more and no less than they currently do.

      So who ends up paying more taxes? The only people left, the huge middle class that's already the massive bulk of taxpaying citizens in this country. More likely than not, this includes you. Still think the Fair Tax is really "fair" when you're going to end up paying a lot more of the tax burden?

      Add to that several problems with the Fair Tax that advocates never really tell people about.

      As one simple example, one of the other posters is right about one of the consequences. People who live near a border or travel would be foolish to buy big ticket items like cars in the United States. Forget having a dealership in Detroit!

      With E-Bay, you don't even have to live near the border. If you buy a new $1,000 television from your local Circuit City, you'll pay around $1,350. If you order a new $1,000 telelvision from a Canadian retailer and have them ship it to you, you'll pay around $1,050. I can easily imagine large black market organizations that buy new products from other places, charge a small mark-up, and resell them here as "slightly used" without the tax on them (since selling used merchandise doesn't incur the Fair Tax).

      Also, the havoc that passing such a law would have on our economy would create a roller coaster of price changes for several years to come. Just before the new law becomes effective, everyone will go out and buy LOTS of stuff, especially expensive stuff they want eventually, to get it at the lower tax rate. I myself would probably spend a couple of grand on soup, toilet paper, and the like. That would be nice for the economy because retailers and manufacturers would make a fortune. But then after the new law takes effect, the spending would suddenly stop and there would be a bust that probably hasn't been seen since the days of the Great Depression.

      In fact, if you want to make a LOT of money if this law is passed, then do this. Beg, borrow, and steal as much money as you can and put the whole wad into the stocks of companies that supply things necessary for the housing market. A few days before the new law actually takes effect, sell EVERYTHING you've bought! In fact, if you can, short sell even more stocks after that on margin if you have to! If you're lucky and can pour enough money into it, you'll come out as one of the REALLY rich people that this law would highly benefit when the housing market goes bust because no one in

    62. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      The price of goods that you purchase have an embedded tax in them of about 20%

      Hmmm... what tax are you alluding to? Corporate income tax? hah! Excise taxes? If you get rid of those you'll need a bit more than 20%.. Anyway what I'm referring to is the same idea that corporations are using. They are now based in the Caribbean, so they don't pay much US Income Tax. Now those with the means will be able to purchase stuff in low-tax areas, and then bring it back to the US.

    63. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All of the components that make up what you purchase at the retail level are taxed before they are passed up the supply chain. The cost of that tax is passed along with them. The reason that companies are moving overseas is because our current tax system punishes companies for making money overseas and bringing them back to the US. If a US company makes money from their European division, it is taxed in Europe and then it is taxed again in the US. Almost every other country does not double tax corporate profits that way. We need a better tax system that does not punish companies and individuals for being successful. The fair tax replaces our current level of spending without hiding your taxes in the price of goods or through your withholding taxes from your paycheck. You will be able to determine how much tax you want to pay by limiting what you purchase.

      As far as purchasing things overseas and bringing them back, they will still be taxed at the border. If you have ever lived overseas and moved back you are required to fill out custom forms from which you will be taxed.

    64. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fair Tax is designed to replace federal taxes. State taxes would still need to be paid. It replaces the federalincome tax and all withholding taxes. If you make $4000 per month, you will get all of that instead of $2900 or so.

    65. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Just some clarification - from a CPA with a masters degree in taxation . . .

      Is that anything like a Dominatrix with a master's degree in pain? :)

    66. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You paid for TurboTax too.

      "Free after rebate" is the greatest scam ever.

    67. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      You people are nuts. Flat taxation is a horrible idea, but sales-based taxes really take it to the next level.

      How much is someone with a hundred million dollars annual income likely to spend in a year? Maybe a million, maybe 5? Say 5 million, and the tax is 10%. This guy paid half a percent of his income ($500k) in taxes.

      Meanwhile, someone who made $25,000, who is safely above the poverty line, probably spends at least 20k of it. He pays 8% of his income ($2000) in taxes.

      Obviously, the tax rate in this case (assuming revenue parity) would be much higher. That guy who made $25,000 actually probably wouldn't be able to spend 20 of it, because the tax would be more than $5000. But you get the idea.

      Make no mistake about it, flat taxes, sales taxes, value-added taxes, consumption taxes, and any tax that has "simple" or "fair" in the name (think 1984 and the "ministry of truth") are designed with the intention of shifting the tax burden farther to the middle and lower class. These schemes were brought to us as Trojan Horses by the crazy rich, who have successfully been steadily reducing their own share of the tax burden since the early '80s. The unbelievable part is how well it's working.

      There was a time in this country when we didn't have to argue about whether we should have progressive taxation. It's scary to see how far we've gone.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    68. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by will3477 · · Score: 1

      What the parent said isn't completely true. CPA's have a lot of protection, even if you do get in trouble. The reason CPA's demand protection is becuase they can't be sure that what you are giving them is truely everything. At least that's how my mom, a CPA, explained it to me.

    69. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't allow social engineering via child/marriage/charity deductions so it will never pass.

    70. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very passionate response, but there are a number of factual errors in it. You do not fully understand what the Fair Taxis. I would recommend actually reading what the bill entails and then making up your mind. Where are you getting the 35% tax on the tv in your example? The tax rate would be 23% or less since it is currently being reviewed to get the actual amount. The tax would be included in the price of your tv so your $1000 tv costs $1000.

      Prices will come down by the amount of tax currently hidden in the price of goods. So if Sony decides they are going to keep their prices high to pad their profits, there will be other manufacturers who will lower their prices and take business from them. You will have control over how much you pay in taxes by what you spend your money on.

      I have thought carefully about the fair tax and it is much less of a tax burden redistribution than the current system. I understand that you hate businesses and rich people because they are evil so they must be punished, but let's try and stick to facts, not fear mongering. FYI, there are even Democrats who think it is a good idea.

    71. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope just irrefutable proof that I'm nuggin futs. But let me tell ya about the chick that sat in front of my -oops not the right forum.

    72. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by japhmi · · Score: 1

      You paid for TurboTax too.

      "Free after rebate" is the greatest scam ever.


      No, the greatest scam ever is taking a portion of your paycheck every month, and then requiring you to fill out paperwork to get it back.

      At least buying TurboTax is a choice (and a risk).

      I've always gotten me TurboTax rebate.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    73. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by GimliGloin · · Score: 1

      * Gambling losses (add up all those state lottery tickets) ONLY against gambling gains. Not a net loss. In other words, if you win a million bux in the lotto but lost ten thousand at Vegas, your taxable would shrink to 990,000. * Losses on investments I think its still limited to $3000 of passive (meaning you write if off of your normal income) loss. If you risk big and win, you gotta pay the governments share of winnings, if you lose... You only write off 3000. * Some medical expenses I think its subject to a floor of some sort. Does anyone know of a good pdf util for Linux that will let me use the fed (and california) tax forms? GSG

    74. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by CountBrass · · Score: 1
      Interestingly in the UK we have such laws; however all lawyers have a specific exemption: if they're incompetent you pay the price.

      You'll be surprised to learn that many of our politicians are lawyers, including our PM Tony Bliar.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    75. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      The sales tax idea also opens up a whole can of worms when considering money that people have already saved away when the switch is made. Money saved in taxable accounts has already been taxed as income and now if they withdraw and spend it, it will get taxed again. Traditional IRAs could be taxed upon spending since income tax was never paid on those, but what about Roth IRAs? The contributions were taxed as income, but any interest or capital appreciation was not. I am sure there are other issues that would come up during the transition as well.

    76. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by holzp · · Score: 0

      How unfair, one guy pays $.50 tax on a loaf of bread, the next guy pays $.50 tax on a loaf of bread. The very definition of unfair.

    77. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      You can only deduct $3000 in capital losses in a year, but you can carry over additional losses to the next year.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    78. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by jdbear · · Score: 1

      The comment about borders makes sense. I'm not sure what the laws are today, are you? Can you buy a car in Canada or Mexico today to avoid taxes? I doubt it.

      What hurts about a check from the Government? We already give the poor a discount on their taxes. We give really poor people an Earned Income Credit, which is sometimes greater than their entire contributions for the year. We also discount their tax rate until nearly half of the population pays almost no taxes at all.

      How do you mean that the progressive tax works. Do you mean that it works by slowing down growth? That's certainly true. Do you mean that it works by punishing the "evil rich."

      The progressive nature of the taxes sets in place a situation where we have a built in "diminishing rate of return for growth. The more money we make, the bigger bite they take. It does not encourage savings, it does not encourage investing, it does not encourage taking on extra work.

      On the idea of holding stock, the Fairtax is absolutely better. What would be better, a 15% tax on capitol returns, or a 0% tax. Or are you one of those people who don't hold stock, and wish to punish those of us who do?

      I read a great explaination of this the other day. It was based on the question of whether we should be taxing the "seed" or the "harvest." If a king went to his subjects to tax the grain, would it make more sense for him to tax it just before the planting, or just after the harvest?

      We "plant" the seed of money in our economy by spending it. The harvest would be much higher if we allow the money to used go grow the economy before it's harvested.

      David

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
    79. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by jdbear · · Score: 1

      The idea that the Fairtax is great for the rich and the dirt poor but hurts the middle income people (you and me) is well thought out, but wrong. In fact, taxes will go down for just about everybody. The reason is that a good bit of our economy is in "underground" markets that never sees the light of day. In the Fairtax model, the money that would currently never be reported on a 1099 or by an employer will end up being used in the retain market somewhere. It will then be taxed.

      The other reason is that it takes a huge amount of money for most people and corporations to comply with the current tax code. When this burden is removed, those dollars will go right into the pockets of the stockholders (earned by the corps, which are owned by Americans) and can then be used to grow the economy.

      One thing that many people miss is that our economy is not static. There is not a fininte amount of money in the US. Our system is dynamic, and grows or shrinks in response to how much money is being spent. Spend a lot, it grows. A rising tide lifts all boats. If there's more money in your pocket, there's more to spend. With a 20% increase in corporate profits, a 15% decrease in payroll taxes (FICA, etc) and no tax on capitol gains, I'd say that Americans in general will have a lot more money to spend.

      Again, more money to spend, more money gets spent. The more money that gets spent, the larger the economy grows. You do the math.

      If you want, I can help you do the math for any income level, and show you just how your taxes will go down. It works for everyone. The only people who would be paying higher taxes are those who have and spend lot of money, but don't report any income at all. They are cheating the system now, and can't cheat after the Fairtax.

      jdbear

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
    80. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by jdbear · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse state and federal taxes. You currently don't pay federal sales tax. After the change, you still won't pay federal sales tax on used cars. No difference.

      Also, remember that the money you buy your car with now is post tax. You've (and/or your employer) have already paid 15% FICA and depending on your tax bracket, perhaps 10% to 15% Federal income tax.

      Let's assume that you end up paying 10% of your income in Federal Taxes. Add that to the FICA that you and your employer pay. That's 25% tax on the money that you are going to use to buy that new car. If you decide to go to Canada to get it, you've already paid those taxes, so add import duties to that.

      Now think about buying one that has a 23% tax added to it. That's, um, 2% less in taxes, even assuming that the cost of the car didn't drop AT ALL.

      Yes is is possible that your employer won't be generous enough to give you a raise for the 7% or so that they have to pay in federal wage taxes for you, and you've not been able to get a better paying job from someone who decided to use that 7% to gain a better employee at the same cost they were paying before. In that case, you will have a 5% higer cost for the car, assuming market forces don't force the prices down at all.

      I'm betting they will go down somewhat, and your employer will be inspired enough to pass along some of the savings to you in the form of a raise. Some combination of those things, and the additional investment capitol the general public will have will conspire to erase that 5%. Voila, the car is as cheap as it's always been.

      The difference is that you get to control when and how you pay taxes. If you absolutely don't want to pay taxes, buy a used car. Hell, buy a used Mercades! Buy a nice, shiny red used BMW. Used cars don't have to be 1973 Impala Station Wagons.

      The only time when you will be forced to spend taxable dollars will be things like food, motel rooms, and entertainment. I'd love to see food and medicine exempted. That would make the most sense from a social standpoint.

      Yes, some things would be taxed to the point where we would not be able to buy them. It would hurt some large ticket sales. But I believe that the difference in real dollars would not be as large as it seems. After the transition, when we stop worrying about the "before" costs versus the "after" costs, buy habits will return to normal.

      Turbo Tax and the tax professionals will have to go find something else to do, and the money we spend on them (complience) can be instead spent on taking the wife out to dinner, or buying toys for the kids. It would be a better world.

      jdbear

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
    81. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Well, there are probably lots of injustices in the transition, but in my opinion that takes a seriously back-seat role when compared with the absolute idiocy of the tax burden distribution under this system. The working poor and middle class get totally crushed here. Of course, we've been steadily working toward that in this country for around 25 years, so I guess I shouldn't be as surprised as I am.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  5. hire an accountant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spend $100 and use the free time that you know you
    don't have for taxes to enjoy life

    1. Re:hire an accountant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True a good accountant should be able to find a
      deduction that you missed that is worth more than
      their salary anyways.

    2. Re:hire an accountant by yasth · · Score: 1

      Actually some massive(>75% IIRC) ammount of people take the standard deduction, which limits the ability to save. Of course complicated tax situation are a different kettle of fish, but most people have very simple sitatuions.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    3. Re:hire an accountant by matth · · Score: 1

      For those of us not up on things.. what do you mean standard deductions? Instead of itemizing?

    4. Re:hire an accountant by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      For those of us not up on things.. what do you mean standard deductions? Instead of itemizing?

      Preface, IANAAAM (ian an accountant any more, and I never was a hardcore tax guy).

      Exactly, you may either take the standard deduction, or itemize your deductions (this year somewhere around $3-4k for single people. For most people, a mortage (in the first 1/2 -> 2/3 of repayment period) is the only way to get enough deductions to overcome the standard deduction, though self employed consultants could probably pull it off...

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    5. Re:hire an accountant by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      though self employed consultants could probably pull it off..

      Most self employed consultants should be taking as much as they can off of their business income instead of from their total income - it will save on self employment taxes.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    6. Re:hire an accountant by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      One thing to note which I've seen a lot of people get confused about. There is a line on the 1040 form for the amount you were refunded from the state last year. Many people fill out this line. However, if you took the standard deduction last year (i.e., you didn't itemize & include state income taxes as a deduction), you are not required to fill in this line. Check page 20 of the 1040 instructions (pdf on irs.gov), section titled "Line 10"

  6. Re:I posit a dichotomy by mr_RR · · Score: 1

    Taxes are a necessary part of life, to which OSS can provide a solution, and give consumers a choice in their software. Protesting taxes by withholding a free alternative does nothing but limit the choices of end users and perpetuate the government-endorsed monopoly on submission partners.

  7. PDFs are there... by Lord+Jester · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just use the fillable PDFs that are available on the web site.

    1. Re:PDFs are there... by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      But when using Acrobat Reader, you can't save the filled out forms.. Do you know how to do this to get around the crap?

      thanks!

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    2. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need Acrobat Professional to save the forms.

    3. Re:PDFs are there... by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      I don't save it. I print 2 copies. One to mail, the other for my records.

      Now it would be nice if I could save it, and then I could avoid hard copies. I can technically do this on the on Win box I have as I have 6 Pro, but there is nothing on my desktop to do that.

      It can be done, but it is not worth thier time to do it. We use a product at work for eForms that uses fillable PDFs to submit and can be repopulated.

    4. Re:PDFs are there... by Tragek · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm tempted to say 'It's called a printer', but I know that's not what you want.

    5. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Adobe Acrobat Reader 7 was just released which allows you to save the completed forms.

    6. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Download CutePDF maker and print them to a PDF printer. Then it'll save it as a PDF... if that's not irony, I don't know what is! :)

      I'm too lazy to login...

    7. Re:PDFs are there... by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      Really? I'll have to check that out for the Win boxes I have. Too bad the GNU/Linux version is still 5.x.

    8. Re:PDFs are there... by generic-man · · Score: 5, Informative

      Acrobat 7 Linux Beta

      Adobe cares, albeit just a tiny bit, about platforms other than Windows.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    9. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But when using Acrobat Reader, you can't save the filled out forms.. Do you know how to do this to get around the crap?

      Hop on Gnutella and search for "Adobe Acrobat". It's a program that lets you edit PDF files. It's really cool, albeit expensive if you buy it.

    10. Re:PDFs are there... by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      Cool. At least they care a little. :)

    11. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before I up(?)graded to 7 from 6.02, new IRS forms allowed me to save the completed pdfs; I think it was an Acrobat (vs Acrobat Reader) update that made it possible. One that was fillable but not savable was created with 4.01; one that I could save completed was made with 6.?.

    12. Re:PDFs are there... by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      The full version is likely what allowed you to save it. I can save with 6.x at work, but it is not the reader, I have to full version.

    13. Re:PDFs are there... by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked CUPS Has a PDF Writer....try printing the filled version of your PDF to that, and saving it somewhere. I know you can't go back and edit it, but hey....you didn't ask for that.

    14. Re:PDFs are there... by pla · · Score: 1

      But when using Acrobat Reader, you can't save the filled out forms.. Do you know how to do this to get around the crap?

      I agree we need a truly "open" solution to this, but in the meantime...

      "alt-Printscreen", open Paint, paste, save.

      I've used that method for the last four years, and, while not exactly optimal, it does let me edit or re-print copies of my filing at will.


      I don't really know why I bother, though... At this point in my life, the standard deduction still comes out higher than itemizing, so I don't know that the IRS could actually audit... "Okay, my W2 (of which you, I, my employer, my employer's payroll company, and probably half a dozen banks have copies on file), says this number; follow steps 1 through 666, of which I entered a zero for 664 of them as instructed, and I get this number back. Any questions?". ;-)

    15. Re:PDFs are there... by hazem · · Score: 1

      If you can't acquire, legally or otherwise, Adobe Acrobat, you can use PDF Writer on your windows box.

      It installs itself as a printer, much like Adobe Acrobat, and you can print your completed forms to a PDF file for posterity.

    16. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird as this might sound, if you can print it, can't you print to pdf? (maybe even using a 3rd party tool)

    17. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On linux, print to file. then ps2pdf. That's what I did last year.

    18. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and last year I used pdf995 for the same purpose (again, under Windows). The finished tax forms were all written to a CD with scanned images of my w-2's and such for a perannt record.

    19. Re:PDFs are there... by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      You'd have to use a 3rd party tool. You need the full version of Adobe to get the print functionality. You might get it as an add-on with another program, but that is generally an older release of distiller.

    20. Re:PDFs are there... by SunFan · · Score: 1


      I guess they don't care enough to release better than Acrobat 5 for Solaris/SPARC. It would be neat if Acrobat 7 worked under Solaris/x86's Linux compatibility layer.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    21. Re:PDFs are there... by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Simple.. if you don't need to save it in an editable version, use "Print to File" option. This'll save you a nice postscript copy on your hard drive. Then print out one for the IRS and one for any hard copy files you keep around. Problem solved.

    22. Re:PDFs are there... by wed128 · · Score: 3, Informative

      and a good suggestion of that third party tool would be PDFcreator. Google it, you'll be satisfied, it's free and open.

    23. Re:PDFs are there... by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Don't promote software piracy. Many people make a good living and feed their families with sold software.

      Plus, how can we possibly enforce open liscenses when we can't follow closed ones?

    24. Re:PDFs are there... by shroudedmoon · · Score: 1
      Easy way to "save" PDFs on a windows box.

      1.> Install a new local printer on your system that prints to a file. Select any of the Apple or HP PostScript printers from the printer wizard... If you pick a color printer driver (ie: HP Color Laserjet 8500 PS), it will do color as well as B&W. When you print to this printer, it will prompt you for a location to save the output, which will be a normal postscript file.

      2.> Download and install ghostscript and gsview (same site) that are both free and will allow you to convert your ps files to pdf.

      3.> Edit your document (PDFs in this case) or whatever you want to save as a PDF.

      4.> Print to the printer you just installed...

    25. Re:PDFs are there... by polymath69 · · Score: 1

      And why should anyone trust this? The site looks like phishing to me.

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    26. Re:PDFs are there... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Because I got the link from Adobe's download site.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    27. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That or just use a mac...

    28. Re:PDFs are there... by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      Yeah, then I wouldn't be able to do anything else. :P

    29. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could also try flpsed. There is a nice description at .

    30. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At http://applications.linux.com ....

    31. Re:PDFs are there... by rokka · · Score: 1

      Yeah, PDFCreator, the Win32 application written i Visual Basic, will clearly do the job on his Linux desktop.

      --
      I could be wrong. I'm always wrong...
    32. Re:PDFs are there... by ringer+george · · Score: 1
      <self promo> There's a 1040EZ with some calculations at
      http://www.ringllc.com/pdf.shtml .

      (beer.)free but NOT guaranteed.
    33. Re:PDFs are there... by updog · · Score: 1

      Has anyone actually received the beta after filling out the forms? I filled them out the day the beta was released (last Wednesday I believe) and haven't heard anything back from Adobe.

    34. Re:PDFs are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my acceptance email about 2 days ago. Installed on NLD 9, works great. Starts faster than 5 and looks almost exactly the same as Reader 7 on Windows

    35. Re:PDFs are there... by modicr · · Score: 1

      More info and useful links in this thread:

      http://lwn.net/Articles/118023/

    36. Re:PDFs are there... by wed128 · · Score: 1

      ok fine. Print to file in cups, then use ps2pdf.

    37. Re:PDFs are there... by PhotonCowboy · · Score: 1

      Haven't checked lately, but last year the acrobat plugin for Mozilla allowed editing forms and had a save button. I filled out the forms in Galeon with numbers from a Gnumeric spreadsheet.

    38. Re:PDFs are there... by PhotonCowboy · · Score: 1

      Re: Gnumeric. This provoked me to wonder whether the basic arithmetic could be incorporated into the PDF form itself. Is that an inexploited feature of any existing PDF spec?

  8. Free File by captnitro · · Score: 5, Informative

    The IRS has a Free File program that a number of companies provide assuming you don't have any "special cases", that is to say, can use the basic 1040 -- don't own a business, take standard deduction, etc. I've found (whodathunkit) H&R Block's Free File program to be quite good. I did my taxes in my lunchbreak and got my refund the next week.

    1. Re:Free File by returnoftheyeti · · Score: 1

      you can file for free on H&R blocks website.
      I used Opera last year, so its not IE dependant.
      Firefox on Linux should work.
      http://www.hrblock.com/taxes/partner/product.jsp?p roductId=54&otpPartnerId=180

    2. Re:Free File by beaststwo · · Score: 1
      I live in Maryland and the state has offered free online filing of state tax returns for several years. It's quick, easy, free, and returns submitted from the e-file web site require no signature. I usually see a refund in my bank account within 4 days of submitting the return.

      It's a shame that the federal system can't do anything that makes this much sense. Between the stupid-assed tax code and all the corporations that make boatloads of bucks handling taxes, we're screwed!

    3. Re:Free File by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      I've used H&R Tax Cut software before.
      I used Tax Act Online last year. It was very similar, and I'll probably use it again. Just printed off paper copies for my records when I was done. I'd never trust a computer to keep records like that. Corruption, hardware failure, etc.

    4. Re:Free File by davebarz · · Score: 1

      I used Firefox last year (may have been called Firebird at the time), and it worked great on HR Block. It's only free if you don't make much money, but if you do make a lot of money, then you should probably be paying a professional to prepare your taxes and advise you on how to hide your money from the IRS.

    5. Re:Free File by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      can use the basic 1040 -- don't own a business, take standard deduction

      You should be very careful about using the 1040-EZ form. Unless you are young and don't make much money (which on ./ is a sizable number of people), you can usually save a ton of money by doing itemized deductions. Of course, it takes time to figure out the itemized deductions.

      Myself, I use a tax accountant to do my taxes (Local shop with a good reputation). We pay her $300, and she typically finds a more then a thousand dollars worth of deductions that we missed when we practiced on our own (even with TurboTax). Student loans, home loan, children, business expenses, professional education, healthcare expenses, donations to the Goodwill, etc. can really add up. Every year the tax rules change, and can't keep up on all the best loopholes.

      Plus, she's gives us financial advice. I was employeed for a year, and we ran up too much debt. Last year we consolidated our Credit Card loans & some professional education loans into a Home Equity Line of Credit. Not only are the rates lower (4% vs 15% for the Credit Cards), but our payments are now tax deductable.

      Taxes are such a fucking game.

    6. Re:Free File by vettemph · · Score: 1
      >if you don't make much money, but if you do make a lot of money,

      I feel like eighty percent of us are in between. It's just crazy to me that we have to PAY to pay taxes.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    7. Re:Free File by explorer · · Score: 1

      > Last year we consolidated our Credit Card loans

      No offense, but anyone who has credit card debt is either a certifiable lunatic or has had some sort of personal crisis that necessitated the debt. And with proper health insurance the latter is unlikely to be a valid excuse for most people.

    8. Re:Free File by SunFan · · Score: 1

      We pay her $300, and she typically finds a more then a thousand dollars worth of deductions that we missed when we practiced on our own (even with TurboTax).

      There are so many things like savers' credits and adoption credits and education credits and on and on and on, just one mistake can mean losing hundreds of dollars on the return. It's really amazing, and it penalizes people who are not smart enough to do it on their own or who cannot afford to pay a professional preparer. Income tax preparation is almost a tax on its own (pretty much everyone has to pay to get their taxes prepared).

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    9. Re:Free File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I print to PDF, encrypt and either mail them to my Yahoo storage area and/or place them up in my home directory at my hosted shell account. Not the ideal solution but does provide some type of semi-secure off location backup. Of course I don't name the files 2004_1040A.pdf.pgp either. I encrpyt all the PDF documents and then zip into one archive and upload that. All of this might seem like a PITA, but I do this with quite a few of documents so it really is not that tough of a process.

    10. Re:Free File by reidbold · · Score: 1

      Or they made some mistakes. Shit happens man.

      --
      -Reid
    11. Re:Free File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TaxSlayer.com has a free option also, for an additional $10, you can electronically file your Federal and State returns with them.

    12. Re:Free File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big gap between
      young and don't make much money
      and
      Student loans, home loan, children, business expenses, professional education, healthcare expenses, donations to the Goodwill, etc.
      I think you are grossly over estimating the amount of people that would benefit from itemizing.
      I would guess the major issue to itemize and not is your mortgage interest. You would have to have some serious deductions (more then you mentioned above) to benefit from itemizing without it. An example being the healthcare expenses you referenced. You can only start to deduct them when they exceed 7.5% of your adjusted gross income. That means for $60K ADI, you would need $4500 of out of pocket expenses just to start that benefit. If your health insurance is paid by your employer pre-tax (you are not taxed for the monthly premium amount that you pay - which most are), you can forget your monthly premium payment costs as being added in there (see IRS pub502 page 7 left column). Considering the standard deduction for married filing jointly is $9700 this year, you'd have to beat that with itemized deductions to benefit. Don't get me wrong, figure it out both ways and do hope for miracles.

    13. Re:Free File by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Umm.. you didn't check that link before posting like the preview warning says, didja? ;-)

    14. Re:Free File by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      some sort of personal crisis that necessitated the debt

      Yes, we had to cover part of my wife's schooling on credit cards. And later I was unemployeed for a year. Hard to pay the bills without a steady income.

      What I'm suggesting is that people with high credit card debt (The vast majority of households in this country have a credit card debt) who own a house look into a HELOC to get a lower rate, so they can pay off the debt faster.

    15. Re:Free File by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      And anyone who is condesending like you has been incredibly lucky and not needed to acrue a bit of credit card debt.

      BTW, not all personal crisis involve "health." A furnace breaking, hot water tank bursting, minor flood damage, etc. can all force somebody to acrue some debt. But that's just the tip of the iceburg. Auto damage not covered by insurance (tires, damage up to deductable), rise in heating prices, and a number of things I'm not even thinking of.

      How *dare* you judge people so quickly?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    16. Re:Free File by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      > it penalizes people who are not smart enough to do it on their own or who cannot afford to pay a professional preparer.

      The rich get richer, that is the law of the land.
      Isn't the same with investing, education and pretty much everything else?

    17. Re:Free File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but you're a condescending, arrogant, judgmental asshole.

    18. Re:Free File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you got a refund, you're an IDIOT who gave the GOVERNMENT a FREE LOAN. Not somthing to brag about.

    19. Re:Free File by sadr · · Score: 1

      However, if you can't make the HELOC payments in the future (due to unemployment, for example), they can easily forclose on your house.

      If you have excessive credit card debt and don't make payments, they can ruin your credit, but you keep the house.

      And if you have good credit, you may be able to get "transfer your balance for 0%" or at least to a lower rate card without putting your house on the line.

      It may be the answer in your case, but it is a bad idea for some people. (Especially those who will run up a new credit card balance...)

    20. Re:Free File by The_Xnuiem · · Score: 1

      9700 Doesnt even cover my mortgage interest, much less property tax, business expenses, donations, education expenses, student loan interest, and so on.

      I realize the vast majority around here, based on posts in this thread, dont make enough money to itemize, but those of us that do, the gap is huge.

    21. Re:Free File by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight.. You paid $300 to find $1000 worth of deductions. So you saved yourself from paying taxes on ~$1000, which would have come out to roughly $300. Unless that $300 included the other financial advice/services she provided, that seems like 6 of one, half dozen of the other to me. Not that I have any illusions that our tax dollars are used in the best possible way, but they're more likely to benefit you than your accountant's new Mercedes that you're helping to pay off.

    22. Re:Free File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that many believe you can 'hide your money from the IRS'. There is no way to do this legally. It IS perfectly legal to use investment instruments to pay taxes at a later date(401k, etc) or legitement deductions(charity,losses) but the IRS knows about the income is both these cases.

    23. Re:Free File by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Your 6 months expenses emergency savings can easily cover most of the emergencies you listed. You should have insurance for the rest. If you don't have 6 months expenses in the bank (not income, expenses) you need to cut back until you do. Not to mention if you credit is good you can finance any of the above.

      That is emergency money, so you can use it in an emergency. People are just too interested in having every toy now that they forget to think about how to pay for it.

      Only a very small number of poor people can use the excuse that they can't cut back. (In countries with a standard of living similar to the US)

    24. Re:Free File by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I see you have the average slashdot idea that "everybody must be just like you, so anybody who isn't must be nuts."

      Sounds like you make good money, and live spartanly to live within your means. Good for you. Not everyone makes as much as you.

      And cutting back a 'little bit' doesn't help that much. It can take a *long* time to build up that much savings. Do you have a mortgage? Car loan? Student loan? Heating bill? Hot water bill? etc.? Ever had those go up without getting a raise for a couple years?

      Myself, I just had my mortgage go up nearly $300/mo because of taxes. That's not an "emergency" charge either. That'll be with me for at least a year...

      I'm betting you've been very lucky so far to be so cocky.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    25. Re:Free File by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware that most people do not live like me. (I fit the slashdot stereotype - unmarried, no kids, good job...) However that doesn't mean much. I've seen many people successfully save money while in worse situations from me.

      Yes it can take a while to build up savings, that is not an excuse to not do so. I didn't mean that you should be able to gather 6 months savings in a week. It may take a while to save up, but you need to do it. I've seen people lose a high paying job, and not find something close. They learn suddenly how to live on much less income.

      BTW, I myself fell into that situation. No raise for a couple years (cost cutting), before they finally closed down. I ended up working for 1/3rd my previous wage to make ends meet. This can happen to everyone, so you need to prepare. Excuses don't cut it, most people will lose their job sometime in their life.

      My parents were never rich, but they knew how to save. Sometimes supper was little more than bread and water (it was always healthy and balanced, but sometimes it was really cheap), but they still put money in the bank. I never pretended saving money was easy, I only said you need to do it.

    26. Re:Free File by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I only said you need to do it.

      You not only said this, but you said that anybody who had credit card debt was insane.

      One area you are a typical slashdotter though. Arrogance. Don't assume there are "no excuses." There are plenty.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    27. Re:Free File by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      I've never understood the 6 months savings thing. If you make, say, $80k per year. It would take a long time to save up $40k. Then, when you get to $40k, it's sitting in an account making negligible interest instead of being invested?

      And what is the 6 months savings for? As you said, many expenses are covered by insurance. Practically the only thing that it would really seem to cover is unemployment.

    28. Re:Free File by bluGill · · Score: 1

      That is six months expenses, not six months of income! Unemployment insurance only covers you, if it is no fault of your own. Everyone makes mistakes, a large number of people will be fired at sometime in their life. (The smart will not admit it if they can help it, it looks bad) You don't need $40k, you need 6x your house payment, macaroni&cheese, plus heat. (and whatever else it takes to find a job, phone and internet today)

      That savings is for any emergency. Insurance often takes while to pay, so you may end up using your emergency savings as the downpayment after the emergency, and then have insurance pay you back.

      Many people would also count getting a good deal on a rare antique (of the type they collect) an emergency. So long as there is no other situation likely to happen soon, and you don't use the entire savings up, I'd count that. Just make sure you keep some savings, in case you need it.

      It is often recommended that you split the savings into 6, 6 month CDs at the bank, one every month. This does conflict with the "antique" emergency but it is a good idea otherwise.

      Note that if you expect to die soon, and have no dependants, this does not apply. You should always live life so that your last dollar is spent just minutes before you die. However I know more than one person who several years ago was down to 1 month to live, and they are still alive. Therefore this a goal, that cannot be achieved.

    29. Re:Free File by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      (I fit the slashdot stereotype - unmarried, no kids, good job...)

      So your life is pretty simple-- it shouldn't be that hard to save money when you're single and have a good job.

      But let me tell you, things tend to get much more complicated when you get married, have kids and loose your job. But don't let that stop you from having a life...

    30. Re:Free File by bluGill · · Score: 1

      You don't have to tell me. I have friends who are doing it. Well some are doing it, and others on more income are not. It is a matter of putting your priorities in order.

    31. Re:Free File by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You have a weird circle of friends. I don't talk about my personal finances with anyone but my bank ro wife, and I don't know anyone who behaves differently. Somehow, though, you know "several people" whose savings accounts, yearly income level, and past financial history are appearently public knowledge. That's just weird.

    32. Re:Free File by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I do not know my friends finances in detail. However I can make educated guesses because I know what they do, and about how much that job pays. (Some have left paystubs in my car when I gave them a ride) I know about howmuch their house way worth when they bought it. I have a pretty good idea what they paid for their cars, particularly if it is brand new. Do some simple math and I have a good idea of their ability to save money. I can see other things they It isn't hard to see who is living beyond their means, and who is not.

      Those living beyond their means have designer clothes of the latest style. They have new cars. There is no way they can be saving money because the car payment and house payment is most of their income. Somehow they are also eating out often. Somehow they are buying clothing. Somehow they find money for other toys.

      Those who are saving money are easy to tell: they do not drive new cars. They have no problem with Wal*mart clothes (or other discount retailer).

    33. Re:Free File by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I know several poor people who don't drive new cars, and who wear Wal-Mart clothes. They're not saving money. I wear designer clothes, get a replacement car roughly yearly (not new, but cookie-cutter cars don't appeal to me), eat out often, and buy new toys for both the wife and myself. We're well within our means, despite the guess one might make about my pay as "computer guy" at a company that appears quite small, located in a small town.

      Don't know their finances in deatil == don't know if they're saving money or not. Ass, you, me. :)

      Oh - this is light-hearted. Don't take me too seriously. I'd be smiling and clearly just ribbing you if we were face to face - I get your point...

    34. Re:Free File by TeleoMan · · Score: 1
      (not new, but cookie-cutter cars don't appeal to me)

      I hear you loud and clear, buddy. Personally I have two Chrysler Cordobas, one is in fairly decent body shape, the other has no straight body panels, discolored paint, and looks like a heap. It's amazing how people will stay away from you when it's obvious that one more dent won't mean a damn thing. People don't cut me off, don't tailgate me, and don't play road-rage-roulette with me, because 4400lbs of steel and iron awaits them. (It's obvious that I won't be dodging out of the way.)

      --
      $6.21 is the number of the beast before sales tax. Meh.
  9. Check back on Jan 14th by alen · · Score: 5, Informative

    I forgot where I read it, but on the 14th on the http://www.irs.gov/ they will post a full list of where you can file an electronic return for free.

    1. Re:Check back on Jan 14th by vettemph · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, The IRS mentions the FOR FREE* option.

      *After you scroll to the bottom of a long, long page about qualifications you come to the part that could have been at the top of a very short page. You could qualify if your adjusted gross income is less than about 11,000. Obfuscation in true government form.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    2. Re:Check back on Jan 14th by Spunk · · Score: 0

      You're certainly correct in spirit :)

      But just to clarify for those taking this literally: there are many different sets of criteria for free electronic filing, and they change yearly. I didn't qualify in 2002 but I did for 2003 (and it was because my income was above a certain range), so it's worthwile to check.

      Of course, any decent government wouldn't charge ANYONE to pay their taxes. Grr.

    3. Re:Check back on Jan 14th by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you weren't refering to the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) income limits? I've filed in the past, and filed for free for making less than 30-35k a year for my federal. Now, being married, my wife and I made nearly 70k last year, so I'll be filing with paper forms to save my $20. Performing a civic duty shouldn't cost a darn penny.

  10. Re:I posit a dichotomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody without a sense of humor should have to pay double.

  11. dual boot by mslinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll take a break from Linux and boot into WinXP Home (which I bought a $89 OEM license for). I'll buy a copy of Turbo Tax from Walmart for $30 bucks and submit my return online.

    It's not all or nothing. Windows is great for stuff like this. Don't let your ideology get in the way of cheap, efficient, widely avaiable software that'll make your life easier.

    1. Re:dual boot by grazzy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thats why hes asking for a free solutiton. Do you reboot to use notepad because its more convenient than emacs?

    2. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      notepas isn't more convenient than emacs. TurboTax for Windows is mroe convenient than no tax software or inferior tax software.

    3. Re:dual boot by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Some of us are ourselves cheap, you insensitive clod! $120 may not be much anymore, but it's still not petty cash! And I'll let whatever ideology I want to get in the way, you doubly-insensitive clod!

    4. Re:dual boot by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then while I am in windows I have no routing for my neighborhood wireless I source... my wife gets pissed because she can't get to the ogg share drive for her music... and my Mythtv can't record any programs...

      Yes I could get more computers... but then again a computer + a copy of windows + a tax program... you might as well have a CPA do it for you so you at least have the time free to do something else... the cost sure isn't gonna be different.

      Remember... dual boot is only an option on a machine that is 100% a workstation... and when you have linux not many people treat their "workstations" like 100% workstations.

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    5. Re:dual boot by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Why would he install another OS just for taxes? That means at least one additional partition, a couple gigs of wasted hard drive space, and maybe some mucking with boot loaders until it works properly. Plus, your "solution" is certainly no less expensive than doing it on the web.

      Personally, I do mine online. It is quick, fairly cheap (I get to do the EZ form), and everything is done for me. Some of those sites out there think they don't support your browser, so I just set Konquerer to identify itself as IE to those sites. Problem solved and page works fine.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    6. Re:dual boot by dougmc · · Score: 1
      I'll take a break from Linux and boot into WinXP Home
      ...
      It's not all or nothing. Windows is great for stuff like this.
      Eh? I'm sure Windows runs Turbo Tax just fine -- that's what it's designed to run under, after all.

      I don't understand your `all or nothing' comment at all. What's all or nothing?

      In the past, Tax Cut and Turbo Tax have run fine on Wine. As long as they aren't trying to do some really stupid low-level DRM stuff (like Turbo Tax did last year) I'd expect it to still work fine under Wine.

    7. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Not everybody is as willing to sell their freedom for $120 as you appear to be.

    8. Re:dual boot by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "It's not all or nothing. Windows is great for stuff like this. Don't let your ideology get in the way of cheap, efficient, widely avaiable software that'll make your life easier."

      What's even cooler about that approach is you suddenly have a huge library of games available to you. If you ever get bored with Tux Racer...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:dual boot by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Why would he install another OS just for taxes?"

      Actually he said to install Windows to broaden the availability of software to you. For some strange reason, most of Slashdot doesn't understand the idea that having both Linux and Windows around means you can do more stuff than just having either one of them up and running.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:dual boot by grazzy · · Score: 1

      Who decides whats convenient and not? You? Me?

      No, its individual.

    11. Re:dual boot by kerskine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't forget that the cost of WinXP and Turbotax is it self tax deductable (tax preperation expenses).

      --
      ****

      "I'd never want to join a club that would have me as a member" - G. Marx
    12. Re:dual boot by sloanster · · Score: 1

      For some strange reason, most of Slashdot doesn't understand the idea that having both Linux and Windows around

      LOL. nice troll, but try again:

      "most of slashdot" are just like you: a microsoft windows user, who may have heard about linux...

    13. Re:dual boot by clovis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      vmware?

    14. Re:dual boot by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Don't forget that the cost of WinXP and Turbotax is it self tax deductable (tax preperation expenses).

      Not that deductability matters in small increments like that. A hundred and thirty bucks in software is meaningless for anyone who deducts enough to get over the "standard deduction". It is, after all, just a deduction in income; you save maybe twenty, maybe thirty bucks off your tax bill.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:dual boot by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Crap, I could deduct a whole computer with that line of thinking!

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    16. Re:dual boot by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you have any kind of home-based business, it's perfectly safe to deduct the cost of a computer through Section 179 of the tax code. (In English, that simply means that you deduct the money you pay for the computer instead of spreading the deduction over your years of ownership, as larger businesses have to do).

      If you're doing any form of computer consulting and can book even fairly minimal revenue, the deduction is not generally questioned. Of course if you're working for an employer only you generally can't do it.

      Hope that helps. I am not a lawyer or tax advisor; check your tax advisor or book for details, etc.

      D

    17. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's like having dual citizenship in both the USA and Cuba!

      Don't let your democratic ideals get in the way of your desire to get a good meal or watch a good baseball game! God bless the USA! And Viva Fidel!

      PS: Apparently some on slashdot don't realize that many of us have dumped Windows for non-ideological reasons.

    18. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't let your ideology get in the way of cheap, efficient, widely avaiable software that'll make your life easier.

      Yeah, I'm sure everybody here runs Linux because of ideology.

      Frankly, I'm terrified of Windows at this point. I just assume that any windows machine is under control of at least 2-3 different hackers.

      And you want me to file my taxes with this thing?

      I'll boot Windows only with 1) all non-Windows storage devices removed from the machine and 2) all network devices removed.

    19. Re:dual boot by boodaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't need to have a business. If you use the computer in any way for work, you can deduct it.

      That includes being on-call and having to log in from home, authoring a book, computer training, computer certifications, and so on.

      You can also deduct web hosting fees (you test code there to make sure you've learned what you've been studying), ISP fees (you have to have an internet account to log in to work with the computer you're deducting) and more.

      Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney or tax preparer, I just have a damn good financial planner and tax preparer. I've been deducting everything related to my computer for years. I've also been deducting my vacations because wherever I go, I drop off a couple resumes and get some business cards and call it "job hunting".

      Magazine subscriptions and book costs related to computers (or your work period if your work isn't
      I.T.) can also be deducted.

    20. Re:dual boot by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, it's like having dual citizenship in both the USA and Cuba!"

      Actually, it's more like having a pick-up truck and a small inexpensive sports car.

      "PS: Apparently some on slashdot don't realize that many of us have dumped Windows for non-ideological reasons."

      Yet many of you still whine about things like game availability or software incompatibility on Linux. I hope for your sake the benefit outweighs the negative. If it doesn't, then I'd strongly recommend you pay more attention to the suggestion the other dude made. You would think I was a total retard if I bitched about Linux only software but had some excuse not to dual boot with Linux. "I saw Linus eating non-dolphin-safe tuna!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:dual boot by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      It's not all or nothing. Windows is great for stuff like this. Don't let your ideology get in the way of cheap, efficient, widely avaiable software that'll make your life easier.

      I'd rather not pay $89+$30 to do my taxes, but thanks anyway :) Windows isn't great for stuff like this, it just has the software available on the commercial market.

      Hell, I'd rather not PAY. My taxes are straight forward, you'd think they'd have an interface for that. I make more than the "free filing" places allow, and I only use Linux. <sarcasm>OH yes, I keep forgetting, I guess I need to give up some of my hordes of cash to file. </sarcasm> I've done my own taxes easily, where can I e-file it for free?

      If the IRS wants us to e-file, make it free if we fill our own forms out. EOF.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    22. Re:dual boot by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Wait wait wait, this guy asked for a Linux solution for tax software and your suggestion was to buy windows and install turbotax? Ah, very insightful.

    23. Re:dual boot by mattbee · · Score: 1

      Or for those who have an objection to using non-free software to do their accounts, draw all your income & expenses up on Openoffice, print it out, then pay an accountant to fill in your forms! It's a once a year expense and they should be able to save you *at least* their own fee on your taxes (£100 or so over here). Even if your taxes are so simple that they can't, it's much cheaper than making a mistake (given that our Inland Revenue will fine you pretty heavily for those).

      --
      Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
    24. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, you are so leet. Grow up and get a second machine as a server.

    25. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good Grief crossover by codeweavers, www.codeweavers.com runs turbotax flawlessly. There is no need to boot into windows for taxes or your checkbook (quicken runs very well too). Just some food for thought.

    26. Re:dual boot by Zphbeeblbrox · · Score: 1
      "What's even cooler about that approach is you suddenly have a huge library of games available to you. If you ever get bored with Tux Racer..."

      You can get bored of tuxracer? surely not. I still haven't made it all the way down the mountain on Desperation. That has to be one of the most addictive games out there. Too bad windows only users miss out on it :-)
      --
      If you see spelling or grammatical errors don't blame me. I tried to preview but IE here at work borked the CSS
    27. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your in any sort of consulting/computer tech business you can also buy all your software (games, etc...) at Wal-Mart and deduct them. They are listed as 'software' on the receipt... could be anything. That copy of Half-Life 2 turns into software you needed for business use.

    28. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're VM stuff rocks! -A happy long time user

    29. Re:dual boot by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it means agreeing to a draconian EULA. (I take it you've never read the thing.)

      More software isn't worth the liability.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    30. Re:dual boot by Ranger96 · · Score: 1

      I (and my 5 year old son) play Tux Racer all the time my Windows XP box. It's on the GNUWin II CD.

      Might want to check out those statements of fact before you make them :-)

      --
      What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.-Ecclesiastes 1:9
    31. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone thinks using Windows takes away their freedom.

    32. Re:dual boot by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 1

      Obviously you havn't tried running vmware and a PCHDTV card at the same time for mythtv....

      While vmware is valid it also severely berates the CPU scheduling... which makes near realtime processes have serious hickups.

      Plus it is again $$$$$...

      We have already heard quite a few users on here say their countries taxes are done in a Java app and it works just fine under almost any OS... why can't we have the same thing in the good old US?

      Ohh yeah... politicians... :}

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    33. Re:dual boot by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, but it means agreeing to a draconian EULA. (I take it you've never read the thing.)"

      I have read it and it's not the 'sell your soul to the devil' document that Slashdot has made it out to be. Most of the 'violations' had to do with Automatic Update.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    34. Re:dual boot by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Only if you itemize, which most people don't.

      If you don't itemize, you can only take the standard deduction, which is fairly large. In order to take most "deductions" (including a deduction for tax preparation expenses, or charitable donations), the total of all such deductions must exceed the standard deduction. This only rarely happens.

      So before you try to deduct the cost of said software, check with your tax professional. You probably can't.

      IANATPBMMI. (IANA tax pro, but my mother is.)

      p

    35. Re:dual boot by Zphbeeblbrox · · Score: 1

      cool thanks for the info. I didn't know it was available there. Now I can show some friends what my kids keep begging me to play. :-)

      --
      If you see spelling or grammatical errors don't blame me. I tried to preview but IE here at work borked the CSS
    36. Re:dual boot by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Not everyone thinks the earth is round either.
      Food for thought.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    37. Re:dual boot by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      "I've also been deducting my vacations because wherever I go, I drop off a couple resumes and get some business cards and call it "job hunting"."

      I'm happy you're saving money by cheating the IRS, but don't you realize that you are indirectly costing everyone else more money? It must be nice to have lax ethics...

    38. Re:dual boot by servanya · · Score: 1

      There is a windows version of Tux Racer, but people who don't have their heads up their rears (*nix users who like windows too) are too busy playing HL2 to care.

    39. Re:dual boot by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Do you reboot to use notepad because its more convenient than emacs?
      Of course not. I just use the Windows emulator lisp script that comes with emacs, and run notepad within that. You should never have to reboot^H^H^H^H^H^H switch focus away from Emacs to do something.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    40. Re:dual boot by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but don't you realize that you are indirectly costing everyone else more money?

      I agree with your point - but do you really think that taxes would be lower if everyone reported every cent of income and paid the proper taxes on it?

      He's balanced out by those who don't know about the existing (or new!) credits and fail to take advantage of them and those who do a bunch of small (individually insignificant, but things can add up!) things that they could take advantage of but don't.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    41. Re:dual boot by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Even if you do itemize it's a miscellaneous deduction subject to a 2% floor. So just your miscellaneous deductions have to exceed 2% of your AGI (adjusted gross income, basically your income). Here's a list of other miscellaneous deductions.

      In order to take most "deductions" (including a deduction for tax preparation expenses, or charitable donations), the total of all such deductions must exceed the standard deduction. This only rarely happens.

      It's not really that rare to itemize. If you've got a mortgage, most of the time you can itemize (mortgage interest and property taxes are generally big itemized deductions). And this year you can take sales taxes, which is a big boon for people in states like Florida with no income taxes (and for tax preparers in Florida like me who make more money when people itemize).

    42. Re:dual boot by jrockway · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, most people who don't have their heads up their rears (*nix users) are doing something more useful with their lives than playing HL2.

      Nice way to justify your $600 graphics card, though.

      --
      My other car is first.
    43. Re:dual boot by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      Do you reboot to use notepad because its more convenient than emacs?

      No, I use vi.

    44. Re:dual boot by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      I'm far more annoyed with rich folks who avoid paying taxes(other than through charitable donation and other beneficial systems) than I am about some computer consultant schmuck who if he's really lucky these days might be making $60,000 a year, again that's if he's really lucky. Whatever he saves spread over everyone else is bugger all.

    45. Re:dual boot by gumbi+west · · Score: 2
      Well, you can deduct your grocery bill if you want, but that doesn't mean that you won't end up in court if you get audited.

      I wouldn't deduct most of what you listed (look at pub 529). It is not a business expense because it is otherwise useful (the books and most magazines are useful). As an example, you can't deduct the cost of any dress cloathing that you have to wear to work so long as you could wear it not to work. i.e. coveralls and hard hat are deductable, 3-piece suit, not.

      You have to remember though that the people who give you advide (including your tax preparer) are not on the liable for the advice they gave when you get audited. It is you who gets nailed when you get audited, so there is an incentive among preparers to fudge around the edges so that their clients like them and give them word of mouth advertising--afterall, it is their client's asses, not theirs. And since most won't be audited, this works.

      If you look in pub 529 you will see that your home computer can only be deducted in certain cases--they say that taking work home does not count and have a 50% use test... but good luck with the roll of the dice.

    46. Re:dual boot by qw(name) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why anyone thinks cheating on your taxes is right is beyond me. These same kind of loopholes are what people in Congress use to get away with things that make us (the public) angry at them. Maybe they really are reflecting the will of the people...

    47. Re:dual boot by vettemph · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's like getting 30% off of something you didn't need in the first place. This trick usually only works with shoes. (and the gender that buys to many of them) :) If deducting the cost of tax software was a win I would find a $5000 package.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    48. Re:dual boot by taylortbb · · Score: 1

      I have dumped windows becuase I don't like it for practical reasons, that is why I've got my nVidia driver, JRE, Flash Plugin, Adobe Reader, and all the other proprietary software. I will choose whatever is more convienent (and source code is in certain circumstances a factor in practicality), I may hate windows but I keep it around. Every now and then there is this thing you have to do from windows.

      While for 99% of applications Linux is supirior, but it has its failings (and no I'm not trolling, there is no such thing as a perfect OS), I think anyone who completely dumps windows on every computer is being silly, having one copy, on one computer, is always a good idea, just incase.

      You find Linux supirior and thats what you use, but that doesn't make it illegal to think that other OSes have their occasional use. A compromise is an answer.

    49. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is not great now and hasn't been great ever. There is nothing that inovative or great about the crappy bloated system. What is great in regards to windows is the 3rd party software build for windows. And all that has to do with windows is that M$ released an sdk that most companies partially use. However just because there are applications running on Windows that still doesn't make the OS any better or worst. And that is something that about 99% of the computer users out there seem to not want to understand. You can put leather seats and all the rest of the goodies in a crappy old Geo and it might even look great but it'll never run like a Lexus or heck even like a Mitsubishi (which is relatevely inexpensive).

    50. Re:dual boot by POLAX · · Score: 1

      "Windows is great for stuff like this." I don't see how a version of QuickTax or the like is so great on Windows and would not be great on Linux if companies like Intuit could get their shit together...of course something cool like a KTax applet or a tax module for GNUCash would be ideal, but I could settle for a Linux version of QuickTax ;- )

    51. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha ha! or evim!

    52. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell... jealousy. Dumbass. Keep thinking you have it better while you deny yourself the majority of software. lol.

    53. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Nice Flamebait, but think again (if at all).

      He said for some strange reason, most of Slashdot doesn't understand the idea that having BOTH Linux and Windows around...

      Then you said "Most of SLashdot are just like you: A microsoft Windows user".

      For starters, you don't know for sure he is just a Windows user. Secondly, he's absolutely correct. Most of Slashdot DOESN'T realize that having BOTH Windows and an OSS (I personally use FreeBSD, but...) makes it possible to do more than just having one or the other. If one happens to be just Windows, then that person still qualifies for the type of user he described.

    54. Re:dual boot by strider44 · · Score: 1

      heh, considering *nix can run almost all Windows software, yet it doesn't work the other way around, I don't think running *nix is a disadvantage.

      However UT2004 is by far my favourite (and the only one played) game at the moment so *shrug*

    55. Re:dual boot by japhmi · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't deduct most of what you listed (look at pub 529)

      Which you can do here

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    56. Re:dual boot by hyperlinx · · Score: 1

      One solution would be to use the windows-only tax software using WINE...I've found it very compatible with quite a few applications, especially any not requiring DirectX and such. I don't own anything like Quicken or M$Money so I can't test it. But for M$ Windows only applications only available either for a good price or (free as in beer) WINE is often a solution.

      --
      In /.space, no one can hear you SCREAM!
    57. Re:dual boot by hamsterspeed · · Score: 1

      I'll take a break from Linux and boot into WinXP Home (which I bought a $89 OEM license for). I'll buy a copy of Turbo Tax from Walmart for $30 bucks and submit my return online.

      For me it's not about the OS, it's about the $30. Like many (maybe?) on Slashdot, my finances are very simple... I can fill out the 1040EZ in about eight minutes flat, and would not benefit from the longer forms. My income is over the cutoff for the free e-file programs I'm aware of. Call me cheap, I won't argue, I just wanna get the speedy refund benefit of e-file and not pay privilege.

      It cannot cost $30 to process? 30 cents, even?

      --
      pants
    58. Re:dual boot by m50d · · Score: 1

      The way your windows license becomes worthless if you ever connect to your computer over vnc from a non-windows machine is pretty awful though.

      --
      I am trolling
    59. Re:dual boot by gronofer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't trust Windows with a live Internet connection. In the time that you are connected to submit the tax, the machine would have been infected with 12 different keyloggers and the tax details sent to Nigeria, Bulgaria and Kazakhstan.

    60. Re:dual boot by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      I havent come across something that wont run in Cygwin, but I have come across lots of things Wine wont run either at all or fully featured. Your point is what exactly?

    61. Re:dual boot by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      The cost will indeed be different... the tax agent is less than half the cost of Windows.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    62. Re:dual boot by davecb · · Score: 1
      Dual boot tempts people to use MS software like IE, resulting in virii and spyware.

      Instead, use Win4Lin or VMware to run just the Windows app you need. Which is, topically, my tax program (:-)) --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    63. Re:dual boot by Etobian · · Score: 1
      Don't forget that the cost of WinXP and Turbotax is it self tax deductable (tax preperation expenses).

      Only after you've reached the 2% floor (expenses amounting to the first 2% of your income are NOT deductible). And if you add up all of these piddling expenses (Turbo Tax, resumes, etc.) you will most likely still fall short of the floor.

    64. Re:dual boot by Stop+Error · · Score: 1

      You did buy some hardware with that OEM didn't you? You pirate! ;o)

      --
      No keyboard detected. Press any key to continue.
    65. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. I have a free beer ideology, but when that fails it's nice to have $120 to buy booze with.

    66. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is great as long as you remember that the new IE6 sp2 exploit can screw things up big time. It seems more appropriate for the government to prohibit the use of Windows on the internet, than to encourage users to file tax with a spaghetti code hack. What would make more sense is if small software companies were alowed to create live CD tax software that can ignore the Windows os completely. I would guess that a Mepis or Knoppix based solution could easily be created by any compitent group of programmers. Strip the OS down to essentials and make it work without a harddrive. The software could still print, or even save encripted text to some other media. It could also be much more secure, than any other solution. So in essence it would not leave traces anywhere except where the user saves the encripted text output.

    67. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even more are sitting waiting for steam to authenticate them so they can play.. I got bored waiting and returned the POS. Vive la Doom3/UT2k4/NWN etc etc

    68. Re:dual boot by lousyd · · Score: 1
      PS: Apparently some on slashdot don't realize that many of us have dumped Windows for non-ideological reasons.

      Just wanted to give that statement more air time...

      --
      If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
    69. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it can't be run in Wine, it's not worth running. (Score: 5, Informative)

      If it can't be run in Wine, then it's not free enough anyway. (Score: 5, Insightful)

      If it can't be run in Wine, then download an open source equivalent. If none exists, write one. (Score: 5, Correct)

    70. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score: 5, Fearmongering)

      You're good. You should run for President some day.

    71. Re:dual boot by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I'll take a break from Linux and boot into WinXP Home (which I bought a $89 OEM license for). I'll buy a copy of Turbo Tax from Walmart for $30 bucks and submit my return online.

      I'll dust off the Windows partition to do taxes, but I sure won't be buying Turbo Tax. Three years ago, Turbo Tax installed a version of IE that I didn't want without asking. Two years ago, Turbo Tax installed spyware without asking and required activation. Remember? Last year, I bought Tax Cut, and I will again this year. Intuit lost me as a customer forever. And Tax Cut is cheaper - twenty bucks.

    72. Re:dual boot by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      We have already heard quite a few users on here say their countries taxes are done in a Java app and it works just fine under almost any OS... why can't we have the same thing in the good old US?

      And would you like to be trying to connect on April 14th? There is already a standard format for submitting returns. The IRS just needs to allow anyone to connect for submissions instead of protecting the income of companies like Intuit through limited access.

    73. Re:dual boot by JoeNotCharles · · Score: 1

      Not only did you not read the article, you didn't read the *blurb*. The submitter specifically said he used to us Turbo Tax on the Web for $30 - which costs less than what you just suggested, and is more convenient - but is too cheap to pay the $30. I think he's crazy - to me, the $30 is well worth it to make my taxes easier and faster - but that's not the point here. There's already a way better solution for Linux users than you just gave in your attempt to score points.

    74. Re:dual boot by HiThere · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but to me it looked just as bad as /. has reported. To be precise, the version I saw for MSWind 2000 looked as bad as /. was at that time reporting that it was. I haven't checked since, and don't feel likely to. Too much up front investment cost for too little expected gain.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    75. Re:dual boot by strider44 · · Score: 1

      You can only run FOSS software on Cygwin. You can't run anything closed-source. Nothing at all.

      *shrug* it doesn't work quite the same the other way.

    76. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some strange reason, most of Slashdot doesn't understand the idea that having both Linux and Windows around means you can do more stuff than just having either one of them up and running.

      Not necessarily. In the example given before, he's sharing his music on Linux; when he boots into Windows, everybody else is SOL.

      So yeah, I could install Windows XP for one program, but it kills 3 services I'm running under Linux for other people to use. This is not "more stuff".

      It's only "more" if your computer does only one thing at a time. (Me, I kind of like the fact that Linux can multitask.)

    77. Re:dual boot by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

      I'm a computer consultant and I deduct ALL of my computer expenses every year (on the advice of my tax accountant). Even my WIRED subscription, my ISP charges, and every piece of hardware and software I buy. Two of my clients are CPA firms, so I also get my taxes prepared by the experts as a "perk." Who the hell needs TurboTax when you have these kinds of resources?

      Also, I have several systems that dual-boot between Windows and Linux (SuSE, Mandrake, Debian) so I can get the best of both worlds, as other posters have pointed out. All of my clients have Windows or NetWare environments, so I have to be able to work with multiple platforms.

      If there were a Linux app that could prepare tax returns like Intuit's LaCerte, or ProTax (two of the packages used by the CPA firms I support), then they would jump to Open Source in a heartbeat, since they are so sick of the "overhead" aches caused by Windows (constant updating, virus attacks, spyware, etc.).

    78. Re:dual boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxact online was free to taxpayers with more than $28000 last year through irs.gov FreeFile.

      I saw an estimate several years ago that each tax return costs the software company about $1. Depends on their volume and level of support of course.

      Also if you can use 1040EZ, you could telefile. I think telefile beats all the computer programs for security, ease of use, and user loyality. And it is the only free irs electronic filing solution. The joker is that the irs is trying to phase it out. (Probably to please the tax software companies.) To telefile, the irs must send you a telefile package and not very many people get them. Only 4million some taxpayers telefiled last year. Try calling the irs (800 829 1040) and asking for a telefile package. Probably won't get you anything, but worth the call.

      Catherine
      VITA E-filer

    79. Re:dual boot by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      Dual boot tempts people to use MS software like IE, resulting in virii and spyware.

      Or, you know, just download firefox. I'm in Windows maybe 5% of the time now, and will run Ad-aware months apart, and only find maybe a few tracking cookies. I think the last time was because I had to use IE to download a NoCD crack from somewhere.

    80. Re:dual boot by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      don't you realize that you are indirectly costing everyone else more money?

      As long as he didn't vote for Mr. Shock and Awe, I'd say he did his part.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    81. Re:dual boot by boodaman · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely nothing unethical about tax avoidance, only tax evasion.

      The rules are there for everybody to use...I'm being absolutely ethical by 1) hiring someone (an Enrolled Agent with the IRS, BTW) to prepare my taxes and minimize my tax as much as possible, and 2) complete #1 while avoiding an audit using rules that are public information.

    82. Re:dual boot by boodaman · · Score: 1

      I run into people like you all the time.

      First, the books and magazines are not useful outside my chosen field. If I purchase a book like "Diving into Python" because my work has started using Python and I need to learn it, that book is only useful to me at work. What, I'm going to use Python to go grocery shopping?

      Likewise, if I subscribe to "Cold Fusion Journal" where is that magazine generally useful outside of my work? Do I use it to improve my workouts at the gym? No.

      My financial planner (who also prepares my taxes) is an IRS Enrolled Agent. In other words, if I get audited, I never see someone from the IRS, and never talk to them. My planner does it for me.

      You didn't read my original post, or if you did, you didn't comprehend what I was saying. If my employer REQUIRES THAT I BE ABLE TO WORK FROM HOME (ie be on call, be able to log in at 4 am, etc) then my computer is for their benefit. Thus, deductible if they do not provide such equipment to me or reimburse me for its expense.

      This is not the same as trying to get something deducted under the home office scenario that everyone tries. If I incur expenses because my employer requires them for my job, I can deduct them. Likewise, I can deduct any expenses I incur that are educational in nature if the education improves my work skills.

      My list was fairly specific. I don't deduct software costs if the software is for my own pleasure or my own benefit, for example. I don't deduct something like a digital camera, or a scanner, because my work doesn't require me to have them.

      I don't see anything unreasonable (and apparently neither does the IRS) with deducting the expenses I incur to keep myself marketable and employed. After all, the more marketable I am, the more salary I make, and the more taxes I pay.

    83. Re:dual boot by gumbi+west · · Score: 1
      you write, " If you use the computer in any way for work, you can deduct it."

      I write, "If you look in pub 529 you will see that your home computer can only be deducted in certain cases--they say that taking work home does not count and have a 50% use test..."

      You write, "You didn't read my original post... My list was fairly specific."

      I'm going to suggest you take your own medicine.

    84. Re:dual boot by boodaman · · Score: 1

      "Taking work home" is a voluntary action. Not deductible.

      Being told by your employer to work from home, or being told by your employer that you must be prepared to work from home as a condition of your employment (such as being on call 24/7 with the ability to log in) is not voluntary. Deductible.

      As I said in my post(s), I'm not speaking out of my ass. I use a reputable and very experienced financial planner, who also prepares my taxes. Every planner in the office is an IRS Enrolled Agent.

      My medicine is the good medicine. I have no worries.

    85. Re:dual boot by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      All I was saying is that you claim, "If you use the computer in any way for work, you can deduct it." Was dubious. It's exactly that kind of thinking that can puts you outside the law. i.e. people who claim, "I took a 'business trip' because I thought about work while on sipping margaritas--so I can write off the whole trip as a business expense." Are sometimes surprised that that isn't the intent of the law. Your claim that using a computer, " in any way for work" is similarly misleading.

  12. web-based tax software by geg81 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Several companies have web-based tax software: there is no software to install, they have all the forms, you get a PDF, and they can also submit it for you. I used one of them last year with Linux and Firefox and it worked like a charm. The refunds arrived very quickly, too.

    Installable tax software is so 20th century :-)

  13. free file by brienc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lots of folks are eligilbe for free filing using web based tools. It was quick and easy for me last year.

    http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=118986,00.h tml

  14. Tele File by xWastedMindx · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use TeleFile to do my taxes. I call a 1-800 number and it's free.

    1. Re:Tele File by djward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some states (VA for example) have phased out telefile, citing increased interest in e-filing. Of course, VA allows you to file for free straight on the state revenue service's website; too much to ask from the IRS. Protecting their partners, indeed.

  15. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How about not paying any taxes 'cause you didn't make any money this year?

    Hey, what a great benefit! I'm beginning to love this cardboard house and cardboard computer too....Whoops, looks like something is smelling funny in h

    1. Re:How about... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      You will laugh but this year I mostly lived off my income tax return from last year, some deductions from my 401k (early, had penalties withheld), and some meaker profits from my business. In general, I expect to owe no income taxes and only slight self-employment taxes. Even if I don't include business expenses, my business revenues (for first year in business) only were about 10k or so, and after expenses, it is about 5k. In general, I have made a better living working in a restaurant, but this is normal for the first year in business, and all indicators point to a much more successful next year....

      OTOH, I have not bought any new computing equipment this year....

      So I am tempted not to even try to file my income taxes through an accountant, and simply do it all myself.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck does this have to do with the question posted?

    3. Re:How about... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      More importantly ... what does anything on Slashdot have to do with anything else?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  16. Being Danish, the government knows everything by sunbeam60 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All my earnings are reported, all my tax breaks pre-calculculated, interest reported by the banks. Only thing I have to add are tax deductible donations like Red Cross stuff.

    Takes me about 15 seconds to do my taxes.

    I have NO privacy in my life, but it sure is easy.

    1. Re:Being Danish, the government knows everything by SunFan · · Score: 2, Funny


      In your country, what do you call cream-cheese-filled breakfast cakes? I'm really curious.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    2. Re:Being Danish, the government knows everything by mors · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you are talking about a "danish". We don't normally use cream cheese, but other sorts of cream or jelly.

      And its calles: Wienerbrød, which literally translates as Vienese (sp?) bread, Vienna (Wien in austrian) being the capital of Austria.

    3. Re:Being Danish, the government knows everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting.

      Wonder what they call them in Austria.

    4. Re:Being Danish, the government knows everything by Spunk · · Score: 0

      Americans.

      No, not really.

    5. Re:Being Danish, the government knows everything by russint · · Score: 1

      At some point in the early 20th century there was a strike among the Danish bakers. Seeing possibilities for a career many foreign bakers immigrated to Denmark. In one small bakery in Copenhagen worked an apprentice baker recently immigrated from Vienna. One day, it is said, he had forgotten to add butter to the dough of the tea cakes he was making.

      A popular cake in the Turkish area of the old Ottoman Empire was the Baklava, square and made from layers of dough and butter and served in syrup. Since the whole of the Balkans was part of the Ottoman Empire for almost halv a millennia much of the Turkish culture spread all the way up to Vienna.

      The bakerboy, having seen this Turkish cake solved the butter-in-the-dough problem by applying the butter on top of the flat dough, and then fold the whole thing. The new creation proved to be a success and quickly got the name Wienerbrød, Vienna-bread, after the bakerboy.

      In Scandinavia it is still called Wienerbrød, but in the German-speaking world it got the name Kopenhagener Gebäck. After all; it was baked in Copenhagen! The English-speaking world followed this idea and started calling it Danish (Copenhagen is the capital of Denmark, as you probably know). Hence the name issue.

      The ideal Danish is made up of 24 layers of dough with 23 layers of butter in between. It doesn't require as much counting as one may think: you simply make three layers of dough and butter and fold it three times. Voila: 24!

      The first one being intended to become a tea cake, the typical danish is round and flat. But of course there are variations. It is normally filled with some sort of sweets; chocolate, vanilla créme, icing of varying colours and flavours, fruits or berries et cetera.

      Over time the Danish has become something of a national flavour of Denmark, alongside the Smørrebrød and the beer. Should you visit Copenhagen at some point in your life I advice you to take a walk down to Nyhavn, enter a small café, buy a Danish and a cup of coffee and savour the moment in the sunny harbour.

      --
      ^^
  17. Just this once... by r_cerq · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... I can say "yay, we've got something better!"

    My little corner of Europe (Portugal) actually has a good e-tax delivery system: since last year, they have a Java application (which works beautifully in Linux, FreeBSD, and OSX) freely available for download on their site. It's as easy as:

    1) Download and run the app
    2) Fill the nice, easy-to-understand forms
    3) Hit the "Check" button, and if all goes well, "Calculate", and "Save".
    4) Get the resulting file, submit it through their website
    5) Profit!

    Zero cost, and very low margin for error. And the cherry on top is: e-submissions have a larger deadline than dead-tree submissions. After they validate everything on their end, you get an official-looking confirmation note in regular mail, and you're done.

    1. Re:Just this once... by Ikester8 · · Score: 1

      Zero cost? PROFIT?!? You people are bananas. Apparently, your government's withholding scam works!

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
    2. Re:Just this once... by happyemoticon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's really cool. Something like that would definitely be implementable over here for state tax returns. Maybe (especially in a state such as California, which is in a huge budgetary crisis) actually collecting the taxes they have at the current rate would mean, for instance, less cuts in services. I can't see it happening very soon on the federal level though. For one, the scale is just too vast, which is why there are so many 3rd parties involved. Second, when you buy Turbotax you're basically buying their expertise, and I don't think a community OSS project will have that kind of committment to detail. The last thing I need is an audit because I used -O3 during compile time.

    3. Re:Just this once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I've *always* wondered -- I mean, for a decade and a half, ever since I started using TurboTax -- why the IRS didn't write tax prep software and provide it for free. Don't they want citizens to submit correct returns? Wouldn't it save the billions if we did? And now that there's various platform-agnostic development environments (I'm thinking Java, maybe you're thinking C++/Qt), there's really no reason that the IRS shouldn't write the code, other than the fact that Intuit and H&R Block would lobby like hell to keep their market alive.

      Tax prep software seems like a case where leaving it up to the market produces a considerably worse solution than letting gov't handle it.

    4. Re:Just this once... by POLAX · · Score: 1

      Wow! Maybe I should fill out my tax return to the Portugese government instead :- ) (It would be nice to see the Government of Canada "get it" like this when it comes to technology)

    5. Re:Just this once... by r_cerq · · Score: 1

      Ahem... I meant "free as in beer", not "free as in speech". The app was written by the portuguese Finance Ministry (or, much more likely, by some specialized company at their request).
      It is NOT open-source.

    6. Re:Just this once... by r_cerq · · Score: 1

      I really meant "just this once"... The .pt govt is usually terrible when it comes to technology adoption.

    7. Re:Just this once... by Rivabem · · Score: 1

      In Brazil since 2000 more than 90% of the submissions are via web or diskette. In 2004 web alone was responsible for about 95%. Paper forms accounted for less than 3%.

      For those who are getting a refund, they have preference in the payments if submitted via web. That explains a lot :)

      There is a gov's official software. You insert all the data you receive from banks and the like... your costs with education, health etc, and it calculates your taxes to pay or refund. Then you save as a simple txt. When it's over, it generates an encripted file to be sent via diskette ou by the submitting software.

      2003 introduced a Java version (only windows before) but just with the "simple mode". In 2004 the complete version went out.

      There is also an official transmitting program that works with more than one hundred different forms, for taxes or submitting of documents, requests etc. This is Windows only, but may change soon.

    8. Re:Just this once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colorado has a similar web-based tax system. You enter the figures from your federal tax forms, submit electronically, and the excess is refunded by direct deposit. Don't waste your money on the Turd-o-Tax state package if you live here, you don't need it, and you don't have to pay a fee to file electronically. Are you listening, IRS?

    9. Re:Just this once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost the same here in Canada: http://www.impotexpert.ca/

      The only difference is that you have to pay a 15$ fee only if you declare revenus over a certain amount. Since I'm poor, it's always free for me :P.

    10. Re:Just this once... by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      I'm pointing out that what the Portuguese Finance Ministry is doing is great for an economy of that size, approximately equivalent to one of our states, for which we have to file separate tax forms. Our federal government is too big and ponderous to ever organize something like this, so I prefer Turbotax to help me get my deductions and exemptions right. A community project is possible, but not really concievably useful.

  18. Tax Guy in Atlanta, GA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you live in Atlanta and are in IT, do yourself a favor and email Paul Wiser to do your taxes...I get nothing for this plug, he does mine and there is no better tax guy period: wfs1paul (at) earthlink (dot) net

  19. If the IRS is anything like the UK Inland Revenue by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Then it's probably a very cosy relationship between the tax accounting software companies and the Inland Revenue Service. They pay ahem ... "subscription charges" for the documentation and specifications, the tax accounting software companies get to call their software "fully IR/IRS compliant".

    Is it time to blow the whistle on the scam by asking for specs without the fees? Damn right it is. Will they listen? Not unless you can get some mainstream media behind you.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  20. Accountants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've worked 2.5 years at a large tax-accounting software company. I have worked in other areas of programming for another ten years.

    Your post assumes that there can be some rational sense to US taxes. The IRS doesn't work that way. US taxes are an ever-changing morass of semi-sensible, irrational IRS rules, constantly attempting to beat back tax abuses. It took a large army of accountants to keep up with each year's changes.

    There is very little residual value in one year's tax software into the next year. Give it up, pay someone a measly few bucks for canning their expertise on a CD so that you can save hours and dollars yourself.

  21. ReactOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe by then ReactOS will support enough of the Win32 API's that you can run closed-source tax preparation software under a free OS.


    I'm not sure but there may be OS X support for some tax preparation software.

  22. Feel sorry for you. by Sholmas · · Score: 1

    Times like this, i'm glad our (the norwegian) 'IRS' made an easy web-based iterface for 'e-filing' the tax forms. We can use SMS :P (yes, the cellphone thing)

  23. Not exactly linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but pen and pencil have always been my "open" solution to doing my taxes

  24. IRS should public in Rules, not english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Shouldn't the IRS really put it's enormous numnber of rules into a machine format for us? Then, use the same tax software each each, with the new IRS rules. Separate the constantly changing rules from the application itself With rules in a common format, a rule engine can get all the info it needs to complete the task in most cases. It's the Internal Revenue SERVICE. They least they can do is make following the rules easy for us.

    1. Re:IRS should public in Rules, not english by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "Shouldn't the IRS really put it's enormous numnber of rules into a machine format for us?"

      IRS rules, like all Federal Agency law, is available in machine formats. You can get the Code of Federal Regulations and the Federal Register online or in a number of formats. Last time I worked with the stuff they still even had 9-track tape.

      http://www.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/cfrassemble.cg i? title=200426

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:IRS should public in Rules, not english by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I realized too late you meant that you'd like the mess that is Tax Code to be presented as a state machine. We live in a very different world from the people on the supply side of tax laws, I'm afraid.

      Perhaps if more logical minded people would pursue careers in politics and finance, the world would be a better place.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:IRS should public in Rules, not english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps if more logical minded people would pursue careers in politics and finance, the world would be a better place.

      Why would the world be a better place if logical people suddenly decided to act illogically? To mangle a well-known quote: "Those who can, do; those who can't, run for office so they can tell others what to do."

      The last thing any competent individual would want to do is join a massive, incompetent, brainless bureaucracy. Just imagine if Bill Gates had this thought one day: "I think I have a really good idea here, so I should petition my congressman to create a National Bureau of Computing, appoint me as director, and then mandate that everyone run my software on their computers!" If you think Windows is bad, just imagine MS-DOS, Government Edition, 2004.

    4. Re:IRS should public in Rules, not english by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "The last thing any competent individual would want to do is join a massive, incompetent, brainless bureaucracy."

      You're missing the big picture. Not "Join" the bureacracy! Infiltrate it, and fix it by eliminating the problems. Whether that means, mere firings, or literally dismembering politicians, burning them at the stake, etc., depends on whether you advocate violence and rebellion as a means to political ends.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:IRS should public in Rules, not english by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      The specs are easy enough to follow. The hard part is figuring out where to put the numbers. Once you've got all the numbers, the calculations are straightforward (for a computer).

  25. H&R Block Free File by wersh · · Score: 3, Informative

    H&R Block IRS Free File - Online Tax Programs - "FREE online federal tax prep and e-file for filers with AGI of $34,000 or less." They also have a few relatively inexpensive options if you don't quite qualify for that. I've used the free option for the past few years and it works great. (Even handles some of the non-standard stuff.)

    1. Re:H&R Block Free File by Indras · · Score: 1

      I almost did my taxes last year with H&R Block's free online form. It wasn't until the very end, after spending nearly an hour filling out forms, that they revealed that it is only free online filing for Federal taxes. They charge $19.95 (and up, depending on options) for filing state, even through their "free" program.

      It really ticked me off, since I remembered filing my taxes for free in 2003 online. I dug around and finally remembered it wasn't through H&R Block, but Intuit. If you make less than a certain amount ($30-35k is the max, can't remember exactly), then you can file both Federal and State online for free. The catch: you'll have to dig forever to find the link to it on Intuit's page, you'll have better luck going straight to this url: http://www.taxfreedom.com.

      Keep in mind they haven't updated this page yet for tax year 2004, it probably won't be updated until the end of this month.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
  26. ...gah by Pyrophin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Quit being a rebel, install win98 on something (you dont even have to pay for it!) and run TurboTax. Its not a conspiracy, its just Inuit not completly retooling something to run on an OS used by 3% of the population.

    and, if that is too much, there is always WINE
    ~Phin

    --
    http://www.pyroweb.us
    1. Re:...gah by uberfruk · · Score: 1

      so the taxmen live up in their lil igloos, freezin their asses of and havein to deal with bright red candians who go "eh" all the time? no wonder they're so cold and crabby.

    2. Re:...gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, way to be helpful there. Do you always answer simple questions by trying to cram your particular brand of (non)morals down people's throats, or it's just an online thing?

    3. Re:...gah by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      You mean like how they completely retooled to make a Mac version?

      More like Intuit does whatever they want, customers be damned. (We Mac users can't get a usable version of Quicken to save our lives, despite the fact that their CEO is on Apple's board of directors.)

      p

    4. Re:...gah by Pyrophin · · Score: 0

      is alot more people who use mac than use *nix

      --
      http://www.pyroweb.us
    5. Re:...gah by Pyrophin · · Score: 1

      no, i answer blatant stupidity with common sense.

      Oh noes!!!!1 I use a operating system that a big 3% of the population use, why wont all the giant software makers bow down for me?? I know if I ever run the evil M$ Windoze ill burst into flames and jesus will send me to hell, please.. for the love of jesus retool your entire package to run on linux!

      get a grip
      ~Phin

      --
      http://www.pyroweb.us
    6. Re:...gah by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      So you're admitting that the three percent figure was pulled completely out of your ass? Or are you claiming that Mac OS market share is "alot [sic]" more than three percent?

      p

    7. Re:...gah by Pyrophin · · Score: 0

      im claiming that more people use mac than *nix

      Dont read too much into this, you might hurt yourself

      --
      http://www.pyroweb.us
  27. One word - VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use VMware when I need a Windows solution. And to be honest, I'm surprised how well it works under Fedora Core 3.

    I use this for bookkeeping and doing all the payroll and HR and tax stuff too. It just works.

    I don't use it for electron filing. I'll remain with dead-tree technology for that, thank you very much. I place absolutely no trust in the IRS's ability to secure their computers, or some other 3rd party. Especially if all they know about is Windows. That kind of says it all.

    1. Re:One word - VMware by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      For the price of VMWare you can pick up another computer....
      Especially considering even after buying VMWare you need to buy that software that runs on it.. windows I think it's called....

      If you already *have* VMWare, that's great.. but for this purpose it's a total waste. It's essentially using Windows without rebooting.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:One word - VMware by SamDrake · · Score: 1

      You can buy a new computer for $189? Wow, that's great! (It's also what VMWare Workstation costs....)

    3. Re:One word - VMware by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      You can buy a new computer for $189? Wow, that's great! (It's also what VMWare Workstation costs....)


      No, but for ~$300 you can. Include the Microsoft tax.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  28. TaxAct? by AGTiny · · Score: 1

    I think TaxAct has a free online version. Probably only for those of you without any complex forms to fill out, but it's something at least.

    1. Re:TaxAct? by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      I also must endorse the Taxact solution. I still wish there was a Linux download edition available. It appears to be a Java based app so it should be easy? IANAP. I have used their product for several years now starting back with the download editions on winbloze. I kept a dual-boot setup just for this until the online version became available. It makes me as nervous as a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs to hang all my stuff outside my walls like that but I haven't managed to kill myself yet... 15.95 gets you the full Fed & state with e-filing as available,last years info auto-filled in for you,tax tips,forms,library of docs,etc.,etc. 9.95 for Fed only + e-file. 7.95 for state or e-file alone. FREE printable tax calculation with ALL commonly used forms and schedules except 1040x(amended return). Everyone go tell 2nd Story Software to give us another cool Linux solution!

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  29. Tax Freedom by Garrard · · Score: 1
  30. Freedom of Information Act by Bloater · · Score: 1

    Surely these specs are releaseable under the ne Freedom of Information Act

    1. Re:Freedom of Information Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about the UK; I don't know if they have the Freedom of Information Act there.

    2. Re:Freedom of Information Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, they do as of Jan 1, 2005. Why do you think the UK gov't was shredding all of it's docs last December?

    3. Re:Freedom of Information Act by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if you can wade through the tonne (US:ton) of exemptions under the Act and persuade the Information Commissioner that there's a case for releasing them.

      Actually they're nothing to do with the 2005 FIA, neither the DPA 1998 as they affect a financial interest. Yep, if a company can claim to stake a financial interest in not releasing the informaiton it's exempt from the FIA and the DPA. Shocking isn't it?

      --
      "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    4. Re:Freedom of Information Act by Bloater · · Score: 1

      Yes, we do have it here ;)

      It came into force on the 1st Jan

    5. Re:Freedom of Information Act by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yes the parent is absolutely correct.

      As of Jan 1 2005, the FIA comes into force. But its very watered down. So much so that the European Commissioner has strongly criticised it for being one of the weakest implementations in the EU.

      Oh well.

      --
      "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    6. Re:Freedom of Information Act by Spad · · Score: 1

      As they probably spent New Years Eve shredding all the relevant documents anyway, it's most likely a moot point.

    7. Re:Freedom of Information Act by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know if it's related but...

      Some years ago Glen Roberts got hold of the IRS' manual for auditors under the FOIA and published it. (At the time he was running a newspaper and selling books, essentially all based on info he got via the FOIA or his experiences in getting it. It included a "how to" manual for using the FOIA.)

      The IRS got him enjoined from distributing the auditor's handbook. (And some agency also got him enjoined from distributing the FOIA "how to".)

      I think fallout from that episode ended up limiting how much stuff you could get from the IRS under the FOIA.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    8. Re:Freedom of Information Act by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Only if you can wade through the tonne (US:ton) of exemptions under the Act and persuade the Information Commissioner that there's a case for releasing them.

      That or do a google search.

    9. Re:Freedom of Information Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Doing a google search WILL NOT get you the specs for the UK Inland Revenue specs.

    10. Re:Freedom of Information Act by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      The Freedom of Information Act doesn't apply to the UK.

    11. Re:Freedom of Information Act by listen · · Score: 1
    12. Re:Freedom of Information Act by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Heh. Sorry.

    13. Re:Freedom of Information Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a google search might not but

      www.inlandrevenue.gov.uk/comp and www.inlandrevenue.gov.uk/ebu/softw_index will

  31. Get a Lower-Paying Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm going to be e-filing for free again this year thanks to the generous forethought of my bankrupt ex-employer. Who knew that by withholding my scheduled pay increases they'd help me save a whole $25 come tax season? Thank you, you stingy corporate bastards!

  32. turbo tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you do not Itemize your statement, you can complete a full 1040 online at TurboTax.com for FREE. It walks you thru all the steps, and you can save the information if you need to complete it later. Worked very well last year.

    You can also submit state taxes as well (again, free if you don't itemized).

    If you itemize, then you can still use their service, but it will cost a few bucks.

  33. Re:I posit a dichotomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There used to be no income tax in the United States. Now we have endless welfare programs, social insecurity, and other useless forms of government interference.

  34. privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd give all your vital tax, income, and personal information to some company offering to file it for "free"?

    Not I. This is one case where I don't mind taking 30 minutes to fill out a form and physically snail mail it (certified, of course).

    Cheers,

    1. Re:privacy by geg81 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'd give all your vital tax, income, and personal information to some company offering to file it for "free"?

      It's not "for free", it costs money. And, yes, I trust hrblock.com (after checking the certificate) as much as I trust any tax preparation software. In fact, I trust using a web-based tax system from a Linux machine more than I trust an application-based tax system from a Windows machine (where spyware is rampant).

      Besides, you're a fool if you assume that "the bad guys" can't get your tax, income, and personal information by lots of other means. You need to protect your assets so that they are safe even if people get that kind of information about you.

      Not I. This is one case where I don't mind taking 30 minutes to fill out a form and physically snail mail it (certified, of course).

      Consider yourself lucky if your taxes are simple enough that you can fill out a paper form in 30 minutes and do it correctly. I haven't been able to do that in years.

  35. hmm by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    dont pay tax?

  36. Telefile or TaxAct by MCZapf · · Score: 4, Informative
    If your taxes are simple enough, just use Telefile (phone filing). They charge nothing for it. Forget Linux. Forget computers entirely!

    If your taxes are more complex maybe TaxAct will fit the bill. I've used TaxAct a few times, and they were OK. You can do everything on the web and download a finished PDF of the forms. The downside is that it's slow to do it that way. You can also download some software from them to save your data locally, but it's windows only.

    1. Re:Telefile or TaxAct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break it to you, but Telefile *is* a computer.

      It's a computer with the incredibly slow and painful interface of "listen to what the robot says, and press the buttons labeled '0' through '9'".

      (Does anybody here think their workstation would be improved by having such an interface?)

      That said, it may be better than Linux for this task, which is kind of sad.

  37. Fiduciary Responsibility? by lydic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've used Turbo Tax for years for a rather complex set of tax forms (A, C, F, and others). What I'm paying for is time savings, keeping the forms and calculations up to date (they are slightly different every year), and a guarantee. If TT screws up my calculations and I pay the wrong amount, Intuit has some responsibility. An OSS solution fir a once a year thing that changes significantly every year, and the failure (even minor calculation bugs) could cost you lots of money or in the worst case, jail time. Think I'll drop the $20.00. OTOH, if this is important to you, you could always start a new project on SourceForge.

    1. Re:Fiduciary Responsibility? by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      You're a brave individual to file a Schedule F using only tax software.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  38. PTBarnum.com will file your tax info for free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pay no heed to the .ru address you get redirected to....

  39. It depends on the country you live... by keeboo · · Score: 1

    For IRS, in Brazil there's just one software provider: the government.
    The software is free and has a Java version, thus you may run in any OS you like.

    1. Re:It depends on the country you live... by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      While this sounds like a good idea, I don't think it is. I have seen how efficient the government is at making things. If the government made the software, it would probably add $100 to each taxpayers taxes, rather then the $30 for the tax software

    2. Re:It depends on the country you live... by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      Not everything the government does is inefficient. Most likely the software in question was put on tender to the "best" provider, similar to civil works projects.

  40. Have your taxes done professionally! by guibaby · · Score: 1

    Do not use the people in the strip malls. They do not know any more about preparing taxes than you do. Last year I did them with Turbo Tax and then took them to my accountant. My tax accountant charged me $150 and got me an additional $1400! Find someone reputable. Ask your friends who they use. If you live in the DFW area I will be happy to recommend someone.

    --
    Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels.
  41. Windows Req'd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is going to be free as in beer, but is it going to require MS Windows & IE 6.?
    BG might mandate that, otherwise he wont pay his taxes. No wait! he doesn't pay any, does he?

  42. "Submission partners" by FatAssBastard · · Score: 1

    Please let me know where I sign up for one of those...

    --
    /.: why the hell am I here?
    1. Re:"Submission partners" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Submission partners"

      Please let me know where I sign up for one of those...


      You can find some of those submission partners right here.

  43. Even the French managed this! by pp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Living in France for a year in 2000-2001 I had to file for taxes there. They had this Java-based software (with instructions on using it on Linux) that did the trick. Well, I still had to use the paper output it generated, I think if you had Minitel or whatnot you could file online too. I was impressed :-)

    Here in Finland they know how much you earn anyway since your employer tells them, so they send you a "tax proposal", which is correct for "normal" people and they don't have to do anything other than possibly pay more/get a refund if the deductions their employer made weren't accurate. Anything special (like profits made from sales of stocks and investment funds, assets etc.) you can, depending on your bank, print out the correct forms online which takes a few minutes, return those and that's it. Of course it can get complicated here too, but I manage in less then an hour :-)

  44. I spent $10 by labradore · · Score: 1
    First of all, who cares about filing online? If you're chronically late or obessive about filing right away, I suppose online filing is something you can't do without. However, I don't mind mailing my forms.

    H&R Block TaxCut Standard cost me $15 at the store and has a $5 rebate. I chose it because it isn't TurboTax (I hate Intuit because of previous Quickbooks and TurboTax fiascos). TaxCut Standard doesn't do free e-filing, but it does take a lot of reading and analysis out of taxes. Yes, I have the long form and a schedule C and other stuff. It does them and I was happy with the deductions it figured out for me. That's worth $15 and not something I'd trust to an open source project. I don't care if I never e-file a tax return. If you want to pay more you can e-file with the Deluxe or Premium version. I wouldn't expect Free tax filing software to be compatable with either TaxCut or TurboTax, so I see no use in it, unless you are the kind of masochist who wants to calculate and analyize your taxes without assistance, and then fill in forms manually, subject to all the errors and annoyance that this entails.

    Incidentally, the infernal revenue service can suck on my paper forms until one or the other of us croaks, for all I care. I think I remember reading that about half of the revenue that the IRS takes in is used in IRS overhead. The ridiculitude of this is beyond expression. In the immortal words of N.W.A., "Fuck tha IRS."

    1. Re:I spent $10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evil Walmart. $10 for Tax Cut. In the store, aisle display rack, as of an hour ago.

      Half the price, and no nasty you-can't-boot-linux-because-of-our-DRM bullshit like those turbo-tax guys tried to pull!

    2. Re:I spent $10 by Leebert · · Score: 1

      I think I remember reading that about half of the revenue that the IRS takes in is used in IRS overhead.

      That's the most ridiculous assertion I've ever heard. You mean that half of corporate and personal tax funds the IRS? Hogwash. The IRS's annual budget is roughly $10 Billion.

      The IRS does a fairly good job of what they are supposed to do: Collect the taxes that *CONGRESS* levies, and the *PRESIDENT* signs into law. It's not THEIR fault.

      Did you know that the IRS is prohibited from offering online filing services themselves for free? That's right, H&R Block and friends lobbied your government to tie the hands of the IRS so that they can't give you good, free service which would mess with their bottom line.

      The IRS is no angel, but blaming them for taxes and the complicated nature of tax law is shooting the messenger.

    3. Re:I spent $10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your numbers are completely bogus. The IRS annual budget is about $10 billion. The whole government spends trillions each year, and falls short hundreds of billions each year. Really, the IRS is tiny in comparison, and is the only branch of government all of us deal with every year. What innumerate right-wing publications do you get your propaganda from?

    4. Re:I spent $10 by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      First of all, who cares about filing online? If you're chronically late or obessive about filing right away, I suppose online filing is something you can't do without. However, I don't mind mailing my forms.

      I'm the opposite of what you suggest--I do my taxes as early as possible. Usually the first week of February. I also have efiled for the last four years. Why? Speed. I get whatever money the government owes me back well before you do with your paper return. Last year it was 13 days from the time I filed the return until the money was sitting, cleared, in my checking account.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    5. Re:I spent $10 by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Did you know that the IRS is prohibited from offering online filing services themselves for free?

      The IRS does so well with internal IT project (http://www.cio.com/archive/040104/irs.html), I'm sure you'd have no problems trusting them to safely and securely accept an online return.

      And given how well the IRS knows the taxes that they're to collect (URL: http://www.freep.com/money/business/taxhel12_20040 412.htm>) you'd have no problem believing that what they calculate is correct.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    6. Re:I spent $10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon taxcut deluxe plus state plus deduction pro
      less rebates less amazon $10 special "promotional certificate offer " i.e. "Buy Select Tax Titles in Our Software Store, Get $10 Off a Future Purchase at Amazon.com" equals $10 net.

    7. Re:I spent $10 by derkaas · · Score: 1
      First of all, who cares about filing online?

      It saves everyone money when you e-file. You think that envelope you're sending to the IRS just opens itself and the forms inside find their own way to a scanner and are read by some custom text-recognition software which writes itself and requires no support nor introduces any complications to an already elaborate IT setup? In short, I care, and so should you.

    8. Re:I spent $10 by msim · · Score: 1

      UGH, that is crap!!! Lobbying taken to the extreme.

      Here in Australia you can go to the tax office's online website and just download their program which can be used to calculate your tax, it's just like the dead tree edition except thats online, you can save notes, go back and revise as much as you like and then authenticate with the tax office and submit it for free!!

      last year it took me just on a hour or so to do including downloading & installing as well as figuring out what i could pull off and what i couldn't deduction-wise.

      I feel sorry for you guys, really i do.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  45. Liability by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    One of the benefits of TurboTax is that if there's a mistake that doesn't involve inputing the wrong numbers, TT will be liable and will pay the difference. So if there's an addition error somewhere, they pay not you.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Liability by Burdell · · Score: 1

      They are only liable if you owe _more_. If they screw up and you pay more than you should have, you are SOL (been there, spent time with their "support" to explain exactly what their error was, they still didn't fix it).

    2. Re:Liability by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

      True, though then you just file an addendum and get the money back. That probably means you have to do it by hand though since they probably won't fix the problem once the season is over.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  46. They have fillable/fill-in PDF's that you can save by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    You'd settle for the ability to edit your PDF's? Well, how about edit AND save them? You can use fillable/fill-in PDF's and print those out... Starting this year, they've also implemented the ability to SAVE the PDF's that you're filling in, making it super-handy.

    From IRS Forms
    For users of Adobe Reader: beginning October 25, 2004 new fill-in forms will be enabled with "document rights" which will allow you to save what you have filled in on your PC. Version 5.1 or later of Adobe Reader is required. When the form is opened, a "document rights" message box will be displayed if this feature is available.

    For example, the popular 1040 in PDF.
  47. Intuit "Tax Freedom Project" by SeaDour · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.taxfreedom.com/

    Select taxpayers under a certain income, or with a student or military status, can use the TurboTax Web edition for free, with a free e-file for their federal return and (if their state participates in the program) one free state tax return.

    1. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project" by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Select taxpayers under a certain income, or with a student or military status, can use the TurboTax Web edition for free, with a free e-file for their federal return and (if their state participates in the program) one free state tax return.

      For the rest of us we're stuck either buying software or trudging along manually (or paying someone else to do it). If the IRS insists on making the tax code so complicated they should provide FREE software and free electronic filing to *all* taxpayers. I know Intuit and others will have a hissy-fit about their profits taking a hit, but too fucking bad. I shouldn't have to spend around $50 a year to buy a piece of software just to file my taxes.

    2. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project" by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Does that work with Linux? Wine? I'm sure not going to install MSWind!

      Actually, I'll have a tax preparer do mine, because my wife has a business, but even so, if they were serious about getting 80% electronic filing, they wouldn't limit themselves to MSWind programs.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project" by japhmi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the IRS insists on making the tax code so complicated

      Remember: it's not the IRS that makes the tax code, it's congress. The complications are so that little congresspeople can get some loophole that they want in there.

      Yeah, the IRS can be a pain to deal with, but they have to deal with the convoluted laws passed down by our elected representatives.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    4. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project" by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      yeah, THAT makes sense...

      Wanna take a guess at what percentage of home desktops are windows boxes?

      I'll give you a clue: it beats 80% by double digits. Anyone else who needs to efile that doesn't have a computer, can do it at a library or one of the booths IRS will be setting up. They can get their 80% without ever worrying about anyone who uses a non-MS OS.

    5. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project" by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I think the IRS is crazy with their current policies. They claim they want to reduce their costs via e-filing, but they don't make it easy to e-file for free, and when they do it is only for a few forms and low incomes.

      The IRS claims that it shouldn't be in the tax preparation business. Well, fine - just put a web-version of every tax form and let people fill them out manually and hit submit.

      Right now I spend money on tax preparation software, but half the time I print out my tax forms and just mail them. It costs the IRS FAR more to process these forms than if I submitted them electronically, but it costs me about $10 less to just print and mail.

      Sure, many vendors have a free e-file offer (which I sometimes take advantage of), but often it depends on rebates. I'm not a big believer in rebates since it has been hit-and-miss on my ever receiving them. When I see "Free after rebate!" my brain reads "$8.95 and the feeling of having gotten ripped off!"

      If it really is so much cheaper on the IRS to have electronic filing of returns, then they should do more to encourge the use of electronic forms. It certainly shouldn't cost taxpayers more to use the preferred method than the non-preferred method!

    6. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project" by smchris · · Score: 1


      IE installs pretty easily in Wine. I've done it several times before giving up. It's just never RUN for me. I guess your performance may vary.

  48. Re:dual boot - crossover by markybob · · Score: 1, Informative

    i use turbotax on crossover 4.1 with no problems. no need for windows

  49. Get Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use Linux you are a communist/terrorist. You don't pay taxes. You spend all of your time conspiring against our country and building WMD

  50. To hell with the IRS by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are not constitutionally legal anyway..

    Just send them a packet of ice tea this April... See if they figure it out.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:To hell with the IRS by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't like the IRS either, but the 16th amendment kind of disagrees with you.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    2. Re:To hell with the IRS by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Yeah I like the original article put that "How will you be paying your taxes this year?"

      My solution is free and I'll give you the source.

      Tell the IRS to kiss your ass. /hears a noise at the door.

      Shit, I knew I should have posted AC.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:To hell with the IRS by DarthWiggle · · Score: 2, Informative
      "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration." (emphasis added) How is an agency tasked with collecting revenue under a clear and broad constitutional mandate not constitutional?

      If you don't like it, get your Congressman or Senator to introduce a bill to repeal the 16th Amendment.

    4. Re:To hell with the IRS by Phleg · · Score: 1

      With the sixteenth amendment, they are most certainly constitutional. Don't get me wrong--I'm a Libertarian--but there's no sense in stretching the truth. The IRS is already bad enough that it doesn't warrant exaggeration.

      --
      No comment.
    5. Re:To hell with the IRS by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just send them a packet of ice tea this April... See if they figure it out.

      Considering that the Boston Tea Party likely fits the FBI definition of a terrorist act, that may not be such a good idea.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:To hell with the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a federal republic. If the system operated lawfully, the taxes measured by incomes would be paid by the states, and by individuals and corporations based in DC, Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands, etc. The 16th Amendment did not grant the power to reach past the states into the wallets of their respective citizens, it merely removed the prior restriction of apportionment by population. Any interpretation to the contrary would mean that the USGov also had a mandate to collect taxes from anyone, anywhere, regardless of nationality or even the currency used.

      Washington, D.C., was supposed to coordinate a federation of sovereign and individual states. Instead, it treats them as provinces of the empire. If you pay state taxes, and you are not a federal employee, and you do not sleep in a military base or federal building, you have no obligations to the federal government whatsoever. As long as you firmly establish that you are not a resident agent (resident) of any state, but simply a citizen or national of one of them (and not the federal United States--a distinction made possible by the 14th Amendment), in any contact with a federal agent, and politely inform them that they are not in an area of exclusive federal jurisdiction, they will get angry and frustrated, as they are all completely ignorant about the fundamentals of federalism.

      Although you will be 100% correct, you will also be beaten senseless and dragged off to prison. The judges will not even allow you to bring the argument up, and convict you without allowing you to present a defense. The wonders of modern government allow its officers to do as they please without fear of public retribution.

      To keep it simple, don't worry about Constitutionality, because the people in the government that will be electrocuting your gonads simply do not care. They have more guns than you, and that is all they need to know.

    7. Re:To hell with the IRS by Will_Malverson · · Score: 1
      If you don't like it, get your Congressman or Senator to introduce a bill to repeal the 16th Amendment.

      FWIW, it wouldn't be necessary to repeal the 16th ammendment. The entire tax code could be scrapped tomorrow with a simple majority-vote in Congress and a presidential signature.
    8. Re:To hell with the IRS by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      There is some controversy over whether or not the 16th was properly ratified, I believe it mostly has to do with minor changes in wording and states violating their existing state Constitutions during the ratification, along with some procedural violations.

      Of course there is also some controversy over whether or not aliens landed in Roswell, that doesn't mean that happened.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    9. Re:To hell with the IRS by dacarr · · Score: 1

      So why do you run from the IRS if they're illegal? Certainly you can sue to exonerate yourself from your taxes, yesno?

      --
      This sig no verb.
    10. Re:To hell with the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greetings "Darth Wiggle",

      Neither a Bill or Amendment will remove what was written, because it doesn't apply to Citizens of a state and neither is it effectful in any wise because its verry uncurable obligation. None of the people allowed Amendment 16; the people don't forfeit money to unapportioned taxation; that which is not justified is repgunant to the people. A Slashdot Tax proposed by a special assembly of non-Slashdotters within Slashdot would receive equal bias against that Slashdot Tax.

      That instrumentality; "The Congress" is a special assembly of people in where? What bounds "The Congres" to any region set apart from whom? How many miles of land separate the effectiveness of "The Congress" to compel such obligation?

      Every event compeling the special congress to peacably assemble for redress of grievances was under a colorable title by their delegation. When did "The Congress" convene and despite the minority it appears to quash, is it any obligation to accept its uncured benefits?

      What "The Congress" are you exhibiting?; those congress within the several states or; "The Continental Congress" composed of the united States of America or; "The United States Congress" composed by re-organization and entry of "The United States of America" in Columbia or; WHAT? It was re-organized many times, three to be exact, with differing creditors and delegations.

      Some states were created directly by the people, while states were created by "The Congress" that you exhibit; different venues! "The Congress" is limited to collecting taxes on entities it charters, by its creation or treaty, not foreigners. Also, you are exhibiting a Article effected by Amendment 16, without exhibiting the original article before it was masked. With such context, it is proper to absolve that the article replaced by Amendment 16 can't effect a Contract principal to obligations and benefits that were not presented by "The Congress."
      And according to the various constitutions that precede "The Congress", it appears "The Congress" can't modify any already-existing contracts; according to Section 10.
      No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."

      Did you get that? "No State shall...pass any...Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts..." The only income taxes that "The Congress" can collect are those on entities it charters, not the principles of the entities it charters.

    11. Re:To hell with the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you use the Google translator? Because you make no sense.

      States, however created, gave up a portion of their sovereignty to unite under the Constitution of the United States, a document that contained within itself the mechanism for its own modification. One modification, approved by the states, whose governments were elected by the people, significantly increased the federal taxation power by instituting an income tax (which, by the way, was a tax first levied in our territory in the _Confederate_ states, which were attempting a return to the mythical, broken, and utopian "community of sovereign states" that anti-tax people are so eager to quote.

      Now, I'd ask: did you vote in 2004?

      Yes, but your fringe candidate didn't get enough votes to win? Well, that's why we have a democracy.

      No, because you couldn't find anyone to vote for? Vote for yourself, because otherwise you have no basis for argument with the status quo.

  51. We need an open source solution by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Seriously. The IRS really needs to fund a cross-platform open source solution. One that doesn't require you give business to any particular company.

    Could be done in Java.

    Or perhaps (soon) using XULRunner.... XUL frontend, JS coded... take advantage of mozilla's cross platform capabilities and webservices functionality. Could even in theory be a Firefox extension!

    At a minimum, the IRS should be providing kiosk's for taxes. Diskless monitors/motherboards/keyboards.. Stripped down linux with Firefox... go to your library, use a kiosk, file... leave.

    http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=118575,00 .h tml

    1. Re:We need an open source solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something already exists for 90% of the computer users and there's always pencil/paper or CPA's, we don't need to add yet another complexity to it, much less some useless Linsux application.

    2. Re:We need an open source solution by FooGoo · · Score: 1

      Here is an oppurtunity for you. Write one and liscense it to the IRS.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    3. Re:We need an open source solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. The IRS really needs to fund a cross-platform open source solution. One that doesn't require you give business to any particular company.

      they do. it's called paper. try it sometime. actually, the irs does not want you to use a service . they want you to make mistakes and forget deductions you deserve.

      of course, we could have a open source solution. it would be as accurate as wikipedia and unaccountable as well! truly the worst of all worlds.

    4. Re:We need an open source solution by Heraclius · · Score: 1

      There should be a check box on the tax form that says "I want to donate five dollars to development of open source federal tax software".

    5. Re:We need an open source solution by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Everybody knows it *could* be done. I live in just about the most backwards state in the US, and we file state taxes via a straightforward HTML form.

      The reason the IRS doesn't make such a website is because everytime the issue comes up, the commercial tax filing companies lobby. Having an official irs.gov tax site would increase e-filing and save the IRS millions. In other words, there is no rationale per se, it's just intentional government waste to create a business niche for TurboTax et al.

      That's why I paper file.

    6. Re:We need an open source solution by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1
      CPA's aren't free.

      Pencil/paper isn't free either... since time=money. Time I spend filling out paperwork for the IRS is time I could (and would) be making money.

      So no... it doesn't exist.

      Your current options:

      • Do it with pencil/paper, spend lots of time, and most likely miss deductions, since most people who do it on their own... don't do it well
      • pay a company who is in bed with Uncle Sam for software
      • Pay someone to help you save money... and hope your savings are more than their cost


      Now why is it that my taxes aren't being used to help make tax season easier?
  52. Re:I posit a dichotomy by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Ignore him ... he's not responsible for his glands.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  53. Turbo Tax Web and privacy issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Last year I did my taxes using Turbo Tax Web. Because I no longer live in the US (and I am not a resident/citizen either), I will not have to file US taxes in the future.

    Therefore, I requested to Turbo Tax to remove my user account, which contains a big deal of personal and financial information about me. They simply refuse to do that, as they say they need to keep my information on file.

    This is something I do not like, so I just thought I would warn potential Turbo Tax Web users about this privacy issue.

    And if someone has any piece of advice on how to face these people so that they agree to remove my account, it will be very much welcome!

    1. Re:Turbo Tax Web and privacy issues by Malizar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I prepare taxes for a living, and part of this may be the reuirement by the IRS to keep records for a number of years, we are required to keep copies of returns we prepare or e-file for 3 years from the date it is due or prepared whichever is later.

  54. Government knows everything in the US also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of our earnings get reported also. The only difference is that our tax code has mind numbing complexity worthy that of Rube Goldberg. There are a bewildering amount of cuts and credits that you can get for this and that.

    And it isn't like we get any more privacy in exchange.

    1. Re:Government knows everything in the US also... by Zanthrox · · Score: 1

      You do have to wonder why we need to fill out the forms. You'd think the IRS could offer an online form pre-filled out with bank/investment information and the info from the W2. I'd think that would be enough for a good chunk of people. You'd think it could be totally automated for folks who would otherwise fill out a 1040EZ..

    2. Re:Government knows everything in the US also... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing is that there's a checkbox already for "I want the IRS to calculate my taxes". From there, its a tiny step from mailing out a copy of my forms blank (received my 1040A yesterday, I guess they send you whatever you used the previous year) to mailing out a copy of my forms already filled in and waiting for a signature, along with a bill for however much I owe. (Or if I'm getting a refund, the IRS could just deposit it in my account. The IRS probably knows it without me having to fill in the direct deposit form.)

      Of course, this doesn't take deductions into account, but if there was a process in place to report donations, expenses, losses, etc. through the year, that wouldn't be such a problem.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Government knows everything in the US also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be nice. Frankly I'd like to see a bipartisan effort to simplify the tax code. For example, I've heard that more money is spent on tax compliance and collection for people that make $35k annually. If this is the case, they shouldn't be paying anything. Not going to happen though; they say that altering the tax code is like ordering a pizza for 280 million people.

    4. Re:Government knows everything in the US also... by Late · · Score: 1

      "From there, its a tiny step from mailing out a copy of my forms blank (received my 1040A yesterday, I guess they send you whatever you used the previous year) to mailing out a copy of my forms already filled in and waiting for a signature, along with a bill for however much I owe."

      Which is approximately what we get here in Finland. If you are not a complicated case, you get a "tax suggestion" in the mail. There is no need to do anything. Just leave it and it will be accepted. Or if you need to make simple corrections, you fill them in to the suggestion form and mail it in. You still need to fill in the full set of forms if you need to make compicated changes though.

      As we have well advertised national deadlines for getting your tax suggestion, nobody can really miss it. I assume you also have national deadlines for receiving the federal tax forms.

  55. Value-Added vs Profit taking by doormat · · Score: 1

    There is a big difference between what these companies are doing. Some have advanced services that analyze your return and ask you questions to get you a bigger return, and others just provide a field-for-field copy of the 1040 form that they charge for you to send to the IRS. I'm sure the IRS operates cheaper if its done electronically, so they should take the savings and offer their own free-file service (instead of having to wade through a sea of "upgrade to xxxxxx for $29.95" offers when you try to fill it out for free).

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  56. That would be.. by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    the cardboard toilet.

  57. meh by DMJC-L · · Score: 0

    I ju8st use the aussie tax program from the ATO and run it in wine...

  58. Re:If the IRS is anything like the UK Inland Reven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's extremely expensive to provide the services that the software companies pay for. Making it available to everoyne with no fee = higher taxes for everyone, not the minority Linux, etc, users. In the perfect world everything would be free, but this isn't a perfect world. (plus there would be no taxes in the perfect world, anyways...)

  59. Taxes on line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done my taxes on line thru H&R Block for years and it's less money than loading more software.
    Doesn't depend on any operating system.
    For my time and money, the best way to go.
    Electronic filing is free thru them and you get a pdf copy for archive. If you think that it is too much money, try doing California taxes on your own and see how much time is spent. It's no fun.

  60. UK Tax Return by adders · · Score: 1

    In the UK there for free you can use the Inland Revenues online web pagesto complete their forms electronically.

    It takes you through the whole process and at the end the file is submitted and you can generate a PDF version that you can always send to the tax office if you get any problems.

    I've used it the past few years, first year it failed to submit, but as I had the PDF file it was no problem.

    Same EDS wrote it, they haven't got the best record with UK Government contracts...

  61. a crappy of options by reflector · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    i don't file taxes, you insensitive clod!

    the things i really like about running a cash-only business out of my house is that i can't get laid off, i make my own hours, and i don't pay taxes to a government that goes abroad and murders citizens of other nations to steal their oil under the facade of "fighting terrorism".

    1. Re:a crappy of options by rlsnyder · · Score: 1

      And you take no advantage of this same government's services, right? Be sure to thank your neighbors for making up your share of the burden. I'm sure they have willingly decided to to that for you...

    2. Re:a crappy of options by FooGoo · · Score: 1

      So you're the guy running the whorehouse down the block. I must say you provide an excellent service.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    3. Re:a crappy of options by wwahammy · · Score: 1

      legally you still have to pay income taxes whether its a cash only business or not... in fact drug dealers have been charged with tax evasion for not paying income taxes on their drug profits.

    4. Re:a crappy of options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but does collecting allowance from your parents really count as a cash-only business? Oh, and take the trash out. It fucking stinks.

    5. Re:a crappy of options by reflector · · Score: 1

      i have paid quite a bit more in taxes than i've used in government services in the course of my life so far, thank you very much!

      and what is this bullshit about my "share of the burden"? when the government misappropriates public funds to line the pockets of corrupt corporations, it is not anyone's share of any burden, it is theft. i, for one, would prefer not to be stolen from. i give to legitimate non-profits, but not to the feds.

    6. Re:a crappy of options by reflector · · Score: 1

      legally, the government shouldn't hold people prisoner without charging them with a crime.

      legally, the president doesn't have the power to initiate a war against another sovereign nation without the approval of congress.

      legally, our elected officials should represent the interests of the people who elected them rather than the corporations that are financing their re-election campaign.

    7. Re:a crappy of options by wwahammy · · Score: 1

      I agree with all of those (except for the last one, that's not a legal issue, its a moral one), I'm as progressive as it comes. But cash-only businesses should pay taxes like everyone else because you get the same services (even if they're not that great) that everyone else does. If you don't like the way the government is run, you've got a lo to different ways to change it (i.e.: vote, protest, run for office, give money to campaigns). Either way, its unfair to everyone else if you don't pay taxes even if you don't like some of the policies of our government.

    8. Re:a crappy of options by reflector · · Score: 1

      i must disagree with your viewpoint, here.

      in my lifetime i've paid more in taxes than the services i've received, but that's a minor point, and there are more pressing issues to consider.

      when our government is engaged in mass murder, slaughtering tens of thousands of iraqis for no good reason, it is absolutely wrong to give money to the government at such a time, and anyone who continues to fund the government at this time should be regarded as murderers themselves.

      further, it is not i that am being unfair to others by not paying taxes.
      it is those who DO pay taxes to the us government at such a time that are being unfair to me, and unfair to the other people living on this planet.

    9. Re:a crappy of options by wwahammy · · Score: 1

      I think there are two different things here. I'm trying to look at this (perhaps unsuccessfully) in a legal way. You're looking at it in a moral way. My descriptions so far have been bad though so I apologize. I still think there are moral reasons why you should pay your taxes but I can understand why you'd want to make a stand on this. If you're caught, you're going to prison which may or may not be good depending on your views of civil disobedience.

      On the moral note, I do think there are very important services that need to be supported for others, not necessarily you, and would recommend you at the very least pay Social Security and Medicare taxes. How you'd go about doing that without being caught is beyond me but if the punishment is part of what you're going for ala civil disobedience, that's not a problem.

  62. TurboTax for the web sucks by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Try getting your returns after the tax season. You can't. So if you print out copies but they are lost/destroyed, you're basically fucked. Happened to me this last year.. now I'm going to get to re-file Federal. Fortunately I don't owe anything.

    1. Re:TurboTax for the web sucks by ICA · · Score: 1

      Okay, I tried...and I was successful. Go to turbotaxonline.com right now, click on the link at the bottom that says view last years return (in fact you can see the past several years) and login.

      You will now have the ability to save them as PDF's again.

      FUD helps nobody.

    2. Re:TurboTax for the web sucks by Frankie70 · · Score: 1


      Try getting your returns after the tax season. You can't. So if you print out copies but they are lost/destroyed, you're basically fucked. Happened to me this last year.. now I'm going to get to re-file Federal. Fortunately I don't owe anything.


      I use this to get a copy every year.

    3. Re:TurboTax for the web sucks by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      Re:TurboTax for the web sucks (Score:1)
      by ICA (237194) Alter Relationship on Saturday January 08, @09:45PM (#11301295)

      Okay, I tried...and I was successful. Go to turbotaxonline.com right now, click on the link at the bottom that says view last years return (in fact you can see the past several years) and login.


      And if I remember correctly, paying for the Turbo Tax web service automatically enrolls you in myturbotax.com for free, which keeps PDF copies of all your forms and worksheets.

    4. Re:TurboTax for the web sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, along with all the pointy objects, perhaps they should take your computer away from you. People as stupid as you could hurt themselves.

      I just logged on and pulled up my old return. You take incompetence to a whole new level.

      asshat.

    5. Re:TurboTax for the web sucks by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      "There are no past tax returns currently associated with this user ID."

      Mine aren't there. It offers to help me start a 2004 return, though.

      Forget that - I'm just going to go to a human accountant. :|

  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. Re:If the IRS is anything like the UK Inland Reven by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    Oh please tell me you don't work for the government.

    Why do I think you work for the government?

    a) You posted as AC.
    b) You (almost) sincerely believe that lack of revenue is a valid excuse for not doing your job properly.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  65. non free is trouble, mbr drm by twitter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Don't let your ideology get in the way of cheap, efficient, widely avaiable software that'll make your life easier.

    It may be cheap and easy but it might not make my life easier. Most non free companies have a way of making things miserable for their users and I refuse to fund them.

    It was turbo tax's mistaken use of the master boot record for copy protection that put a freeze on any new non free software installation. I don't want tax time to wipe out grub for me. This also rules out using something like crossover office. While it might be easy to repair the damage, I refuse to pay money to be screwed that way or others.

    The bottom line is that if I don't trust the bastards with my hardware, why should I trust them with tax records? My bank already sold me out so that my snail mailbox is flooded with Mortage applications. They sent me a form that I have to snail mail back with a signature to opt out of their spam program. What turds. A company that writes out to my MBR is liable to be as fast and lose with my tax information.

    My ideology is firmly based in the practical. It does not hurt me to do my taxes by hand and by doing so I avoid many other problems. My avoidance of Windoze has saved me countless hours of upkeep that I used to spend due to bugs, worms and all of it was compounded by stupid shit like the registry. It's problems like this that free software is made to avoid. Non free software is designed to exert control over you and that control almost always spells more hassle than it's worth.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:non free is trouble, mbr drm by major.morgan · · Score: 1

      VMware has worked quite well for me. I keep VM's for a number of OS's around for various purposes, including using tools that only work on a certain OS or ones that don't play well with other software, different kernel versions, etc.

      It's great, don't actually have to reboot, just fire up what's needed in a window. No worries about MBR, product activation being tied to hardware, etc.

      Like my shop teach used to say: "The right tool, for the right job."

  66. Just remember to itemise and deduct by secmentat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IANAAccountant, but I used to be, and to the best of my knowledge, it is still the case that expenses you incur in the preparation of your tax return are deductable. So if you have to shell out $35 for a tax package (and $89 for an o/s to run it, and $150 for a harddrive upon which to install that o/s) then as long as you itemise, and keep your receipts, what's the problem?

    1. Re:Just remember to itemise and deduct by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      I never was an accountant, but I do file taxes for myself. Tax return expenses are deductable, not free. That means you don't have to pay taxes on the money you spend. You still have to pay the accountant, and the government won't reimburse you for that cost. That's my problem with them.

      Additonally, people who see software as some sort of Right to Freedom moral problem in today's society, take issue with having to pay for tax software that isn't Free. I'll be arsed as to how they expect software developers to lighten themselves of responsibility in the case of widespread software failure, or even a single significant one.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:Just remember to itemise and deduct by bnenning · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So if you have to shell out $35 for a tax package (and $89 for an o/s to run it, and $150 for a harddrive upon which to install that o/s) then as long as you itemise, and keep your receipts, what's the problem?

      Couple of problems:
      1. If you deduct an expense, it doesn't become free, you just effectively get a discount equal to your marginal tax rate. That $250 in purchases might reduce my taxes by $75 if I deduct them, but that still leaves me with a net cost of $175.
      2. If you don't have enough qualifying deductions (mortgages and kids being the major ones) you're better off taking the standard deduction and itemizing doesn't help at all. Probably many /. readers fall into this category.

      (IANAA and never have been, so please correct me if any of this is wrong).

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  67. Set up a lobby group by Malc · · Score: 1

    Look, if you want to make a difference, set up a successful business. Once you have enough money you can take the people in Washington out to dinner and cocktails and explain to them about the the laws they need to make. As an account and tax lawyer, the laws that you'll request will beyond the average person and you will be ensured a job for the rest of your life. Furthermore, as a reader of /. you'll have an understanding of technology and you will be able to bribe^Wlobbby for special terms for e-filing. If you don't like this, move to a more socialist country that puts their citizens before busineses. Unfortunately your former friends and neighbours will label you a bleeding heart liberal and commie bastard - what can you do?

    Disclaimer: there has been no sarcasm or piss taking in this posting. What you read is what you get.

    1. Re:Set up a lobby group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democrats are the ones that abuse the tax code.

      What party has advocated moving towards a national sales tax, value added tax, or a flat tax? Republicans

      Do you really think accountants and tax lawyers want any tax reform? No because tax lawyers and other tax specialists will have little room to game the system

      Hell, if we had a flat tax you could fill out your taxes on a post card.

    2. Re:Set up a lobby group by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Can I write off the bribe as a business expense?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Set up a lobby group by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Yes - call it "Professional Services"

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  68. Use an accountant instead of computer by fermion · · Score: 1
    Well, no one is answering the question, so i guess i won't either.

    I have used quicken, and quickbooks, and the like. They are good to keep up with moderately complex finances. For a year or two, I actualy bought tax programs and paid for submission. Rebates made it cost very little. This is what I found.

    The last time I could file a 1040ez, I did it by phone.

    More recnetly, when my taxes got real complex, I had an accountant do it. Not a chain like HR Block. I established a relationship with a reputable accountant.

    Currently my taxes are not simple, but only require a few sheets of paper. I don't itemize. I just fill out the forms. I am a geek, so numbers don't scare me.

    If my taxes did get more complex, like marriage or a house, i would really be tempted to establish a relationship with an accountant to handle those things. It is nothing I could not do, but the proffesionals have easier access to the forms and infomation. The apps will cost you $50, and your time. The accountant might only be a couple hundred.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  69. Make April 15th a normal day by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

    Support Fair Tax, a National Retail Sales tax (30% on new purchases). It replaces your fed income, social security, medi*, and estate taxes. It even has a rebate for your taxes up to the poverty line folks, it makes sense, put H&R block and the IRS out of business forever.

    --
    09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    1. Re:Make April 15th a normal day by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is... it makes too much sense, and puts the IRS out of business.

      I mean, we already collect city, state and federal sales tax, and then we tax income, businesses pay tax, etc....
      The infrastructure already exists, it is just a matter of changing the percentages, and eliminating the IRS.
      I am completely in favor of this, but the chance of it happening?

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:Make April 15th a normal day by edanshekar · · Score: 0

      Fuck that. Some of us already pay 30% in income tax .

    3. Re:Make April 15th a normal day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You jackass. It is meant to replace a sales tax.

      I prefer the Hall-Rabushka flat tax proposal.

    4. Re:Make April 15th a normal day by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      True but if the tax rates become obvious to some who don't pay fed income tax, they might start pressuring their congresscritters to scale back the size of government, pay back the national debt and finally cut taxes.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    5. Re:Make April 15th a normal day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say Black Market? There is already smuggling in high tax items like cigarettes, and people use the net to avoid sales tax all the time. If all items carried a hefty tax then the black market would increase to encompass more items.

      One solution is to remove payroll tax payments and force everyone to pay taxes quarterly or annually. If people actually had to give the money back they would be enraged. April 15 would be a day of mass demonstrations. The way it works now, the money is gone and people are too stupid to miss it.

    6. Re:Make April 15th a normal day by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      No, I don't think it would - it would just force them to deal with people who aren't as afraid of them as your individual W-2 filers.

      Sales tax is simple for the vast majority of consumers, but it can be a headache for businesses.

      For example, in Iowa we have a 5% sales tax rate (+1 % local + 1% school in most communities). But "heating fuel" is taxed at a 3% rate. A couple of years ago when ATM surcharging was first allowed in the state, the department of revenue tried to dictate that surcharges from ATM's based in Iowa and from a checking account should incur a "use tax" (the money was meant to be spent - and apparently in Iowa!) - and the bank who holds the checking account (and not the ATM owner) would be required to collect the use tax. Bank service charges are taxable - if they are on a checking account (any service charges - even the exact same ones! - on savings accounts are not taxable).

      Going to a national sales tax would not put the IRS out of business - they would just start enforcing the sales tax on businesses. It would, however, get them off of the back of most consumers.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    7. Re:Make April 15th a normal day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of one very important addition!!! Force retailers to pre calculate the tax and add that to the price on the shelf. None of this $69.99 crap when they know the price will be $99.99. Just like car dealers. I consider the process of not adding additional costs that EVERYONE MUST PAY for something to be a blatent scam. $299 Processing fee, $700 for delivery. That is on every freaking car, add it to the advertised price. Tax, tag, and title may not always be the same so maybe let that slide.

  70. Amendments. by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, i dont acknowledge anything above #10.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Amendments. by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, i dont acknowledge anything above #10.

      So, you still practice slavery? (#13) How about not allowing women to vote (#19), or having your Governor appoint your Senators (#17), or lowering the voting age to 18 (#26)?

      Hell, you HAVE to support #27 -- not allowing Congress to raise their own pay during a session!

      Are you really sure you want G.W. Bush running for a third term? (#22)

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Amendments. by Blain · · Score: 1

      Then you're disregarding the terms of the unamended Constitution itself -- those other amendments satisfy its requirements.

      Look, I'm not thrilled with everything there either, including #16, but don't be silly.

    3. Re:Amendments. by dacarr · · Score: 1

      I've tried talking to their type. They're too stupid to figure out that contrary to that, they can run, but they can't hide.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    4. Re:Amendments. by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      or having your Governor appoint your Senators (#17)

      Actually, under the original Constitutional system, the Senators were appointed by the state legislatures. Art. I, Sect. 3, Clause 1.

      This was also an extremely good idea. Congress was originally supposed to have two houses: one to represent the general populace of the United States, through directly elected representatives, and one to be a council of all the member states, through senators chosen by those states' governments.

      The idea of the Senate was supposed to be that the various state governments could communicate their concerns and desires to the general council of states at the national capital. Their delegates would discuss these matters with the delegates of the other state governments. If the peoples' own representatives and the President concurred, a law could be passed.

      Instead, with the Seventeenth Amendment, we now have the same House as before, but also a redundant second House where every state gets two more super-Representatives. The member states of the federal union have been cut completely out of that union's deliberations!

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    5. Re:Amendments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, your "states" are just ceremonial things now? It's no longer the "United States of America", it's just "The American Empire"

    6. Re:Amendments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really sure you want G.W. Bush running for a third term? (#22)

      Heh, if it were not for Amendment 22, Bill Clinton would likely be entering a fourth term, and despite my conservative bent, I don't think that would be such a bad thing.

    7. Re:Amendments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > despite my conservative bent, I don't think that would be such a bad thing

      s/despite/because of/

    8. Re:Amendments. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      No, i don't support anything beyond the original 10, the ones that were created by the founders.

      Anything else dilutes the original document, and yes i do realize what I'm saying.

      Those other so called 'rights' that have been haphazardly glued on to the end, should have been enacted in normal law. ( if they are valid, some are not ). They should not have been made amendments to the very structure of this country. I'm not going to debate the validity of the actual rules, only where they are being placed.

      I wont even comment on the questions you raise. Ill let you decide where i stand, as I'm not going to start a flamewar.

      Personally, i feel that it was one of the few mistakes they made, allowing for more amendments beyond the bill of rights.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    9. Re:Amendments. by chill · · Score: 1

      But the very beauty of the U.S. Constitution is that it is flexible and adaptable, yet not so easy to change it looks like one of those things the States call "Constitutions".

      You can't enact something in normal law that is contrary to the Constitution, thus the Constitution itself has to be changed to allow said laws.

      How would you propose something like making sure blacks were a full 3/3 of a person and citizens, as opposed to the 2/3 in the main document? Are you talking about revising the original text?

      I'm curious.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    10. Re:Amendments. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      The orginal text should stand unchanged. Beyond the bill of rights that is. I do realize that was 'after' the fact, but in context, it really is part.

      It should not be modified to 'fit' new laws, or due to the 'whim' of a changing people/times. To do so is dangerous.

      If a new law isnt constitutional, then it should be struck down. ( or never passed in the first place - a better idea )

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    11. Re:Amendments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, if it were not for Amendment 22, Bill Clinton would likely be entering a fourth term, and despite my conservative bent, I don't think that would be such a bad thing.
      .

      Let "We, the People" decide if they desire Bill Clinton to minister the President of the United States. Meanwhile, any of the people who is not described in the "We, the People" plank should be left out of obligation of the decisions brought from the United States or its President.

    12. Re:Amendments. by bjomo · · Score: 1

      The Bill of Rights is part of the foundation of the US, but its not as if it was brought down from Mt. Sinai on stone tablets.

    13. Re:Amendments. by chill · · Score: 1

      The how do you proposed dealing with slavery? It is codified in the original text. The document isn't perfect.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    14. Re:Amendments. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Thats true, as then it would be a bunch of useless ramblings from a lunatic(s)..

      Instead its something historic, and meaningful.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    15. Re:Amendments. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Like i said before, if a law is struck down due to the original document, then so be it.

      Its the foundation. It shouldn't be malleable or the entire thing crumbles.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    16. Re:Amendments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people do want George W Bush to run for a third term, like me. He's in the list of the top 5 presidents to me.

      1) Abraham Lincoln (ended slavery and brought the country back together)
      2) FDR (got us through most WWII)
      3) George W Bush (battling the war on terror, and not backing down)
      4) Ronald Reagan (showed us what a great president is in not so drastic times, ended the cold war, saved the economy)
      5) George Washington (got us off on the right foot)

    17. Re:Amendments. by bjomo · · Score: 1

      While I won't bite on your insults to my faith, I will be a little more obvious in stating my position this time. The documents written by the founding fathers are not infallible. Do you believe we should elevate the position of our forefathers to the status of flawless deities?

      I am in favor of upholding the principles our nation was founded on, but there are times to recognize that there are better ways to carry out those principles. Historical and meaningful? Absolutely. Infallible? I should think not.

    18. Re:Amendments. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the concept of a 'deity' is applicable here, regardless of ones belief structure.

      The constitutional documents should be taken at 100% face value. Any mistakes that are in it, well thats just the way the system was designed..

      Personally i don't see any *significant* flaws ( except the allowance for more amendments ), but regardless of that view, 'fixing' should not take place. Its all or nothing, no modification ions to suit people's whims over time.

      I see it as black and white absolutes. No gray areas.

      And as an aside, i wasn't trying to bait you on your belief, only stating how i feel the relation between the 2 documents are. ( there isnt any as far as im concerned ) Remember you brought up the religious angle, not I.

      But we are WAY OT here.. Perhaps i should just start a blog of my own so people cant vent at me directly... Hmmmmmm

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    19. Re:Amendments. by justins · · Score: 1
      No, i don't support anything beyond the original 10, the ones that were created by the founders.

      Anything else dilutes the original document, and yes i do realize what I'm saying.

      So on the one hand you believe the founding fathers' ideas were so good that the constitution shouldn't be altered. On the other hand, the founding fathers included a straightforward way of altering the constitution, and according to your values they must have had a reason for doing so.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    20. Re:Amendments. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I also have stated that I feel that was the *one* mistake they made, offering a mechanism that allows the document to be effectively negated on a whim. No one is perfect. But I'm sure they could have never imagined the change in people over time, and their rabid desire to destroy what they created. To them, what they created would stand forever, and everyone would respect their wishes and not try to tear it down at some point in the future

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    21. Re:Amendments. by justins · · Score: 1
      I also have stated that I feel that was the *one* mistake they made, offering a mechanism that allows the document to be effectively negated on a whim.

      You obviously don't know anything about the ratification process, which prevents us from changing it on a whim.

      But I'm sure they could have never imagined the change in people over time, and their rabid desire to destroy what they created. To them, what they created would stand forever, and everyone would respect their wishes and not try to tear it down at some point in the future

      Right. They never would have conceived of anyone "tearing it down." It's not like they were revolutionaries.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    22. Re:Amendments. by chill · · Score: 1

      Lincoln did not end slavery. The 13th Amendment did, and that was passed after Lincoln died.

      Keep in mind, his "Emancipation Proclamantion" didn't apply to Union Slave States, like West Virginia. Nor did it apply to Union-controlled areas of the Confederacy.

      A Presidential decree does NOT trump the Constitution, which stated that any runaway slave captured in a non-slave state MUST be returned.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    23. Re:Amendments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're arguing that slavery should be reinstated, since it was instituted in the original document, and you think no amendments to that original document are valid, and you think all laws that contradict the original document should be struck down.

      Why didn't you just come out and say you think some people should be enslaved?

    24. Re:Amendments. by Damek · · Score: 1

      So you're happy with a flawed system, and don't want any attempts to fix it to be allowed. Why would that be? The only reason I can think of is fear that a fix might be worse than the flaw it's trying to fix. But if we never tried to fix flawed systems, there would be no engineers, and we'd still be bart of the British Commonwealth...

  71. Of course not... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    You know Linux isn't for business, silly.

    --mpm--

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  72. Mac OS X by mbaudis · · Score: 1

    both turbo tax (in various incarnations) and the H&R Block software is available for Mac.

  73. Canadian and international solutions? by westendgirl · · Score: 1

    Is anyone aware of free/inexpensive tax apps for Canada? Or other countries, although that won't help *me*. :)

    --

    -- SYS 64738 --

    1. Re:Canadian and international solutions? by Intricated · · Score: 1

      I'm a student in Canada and being the broke block I am, I've been using QuickTaxWeb for the past 2 years. It's free (assuming you make less than 20,000 CAD), and even with all the tax forms and carryovers, QuickTaxWeb walks you through it all step-by-step.

      Although I don't qualify for the Freedom program for the 2004 tax year, I still feel that QuickTaxWeb is worth the 19.95 CAD fee since I can just upload last year's figures and don't have to worry about things like my tuition amount carryovers and RRSP contribution limits.

  74. OS Zealotry and Platform-specific Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be nice if these software companies would write their code to be platform neutral. Then they could compile a binary for any number of platforms but only support one code base.

    If Mac OS and GNU/Linux gain more market share, those companiees might have to re-think their business plans, or maybe we'll get is a "98Lite"-style version of the current MS operating system if Microsoft re-thinks theirs; _that_ might just run well in emulation or translation environments.

    Oh well, I can dream . . .

  75. that doesn't add up by mattdm · · Score: 1

    I'll take a break from Linux and boot into WinXP Home (which I bought a $89 OEM license for). I'll buy a copy of Turbo Tax from Walmart for $30 bucks and submit my return online.

    So, that's the $119 work-around.... How is that better than using TurboTax online under Linux and paying $20?

    1. Re:that doesn't add up by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
      Because with the use of the web - the tax company has copies of my tax records. If I install the application on my hard drive my tax records stay on my hard drive until I submit them to the IRS - so it is only me and the IRS that has them (with the postal service in the middle).

      PS if you file online - you have an electronic company in the middle that is not controled by myself - or the government... I always use the .37 stamp.

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    2. Re:that doesn't add up by mattdm · · Score: 1

      So, basically, paranoia. I can respect that, but it's not one of the original poster's complaints.

  76. Germany by mbaudis · · Score: 1

    as much as i appreciate the german way to organize things (and somehow less bureaucratic than in the u.s., where i now live), the standard electronic filing is done with a windows-only software. i had to use vnc on a windows machine at work, logging in from home; funny effect, if somebody else was working late in the office ...

    1. Re:Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They provide a SDK for free (after "checking your intention to develop tax software"). The license explicitly allows the creation of OSS. Apart from the DLL package, there exists a Java implementation which is not as easy to use as the C API and only supports a subset of the forms. They link to some websites which offer their tax-filing-service using the Java module.

      For details (in german): https://www.elster.de/elster_linmac.php

  77. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Yartrebo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What pisses me off more is buying an item that is labelled as .99 dollars, and ending up with almost a dollar in little coins. If prices had to be with taxes included, I'm sure a lot of the .99 cents would become .92 dollar or whatever would arrive at .99 dollars after tax.

  78. No big deal in Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to keep you informed about the outer world, Brazillian equivalent of USA IRS maintains since many years ago a free downloadable Windows program to do all the stuff, including sending the final data to the gov agency via Internet. Works nicely, has a comprehensive online help and even stores your data to be retrieved when needed. Last year they made available a java version, to cope with MAC and the growing Linux base.

    1. Re:No big deal in Brazil by protomala · · Score: 1

      That's true. I've used the JAVA version for IRS and it worked great, just had some minor glitches when printing the receipt, but very good indeed.

  79. Just Downgrade to Windows by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    Already written both the online companies to find out if they have solutions for Linux - neither do.

    Guess I'll be downgrading to Windows.

  80. me too. by SinaSa · · Score: 1

    In the same boat down here in .au land.

    The government releases a software package called e-tax every year which you can use to file your tax thingy.

    Unfortunately, it's Windows only, which I reckon is a pretty slack effort by the Tax Office. I mean the program isn't all that complex and could easily be ported.

    If anyone from .au is using a free electronic solution that's as good as e-tax, or at least adequate, hit me up with the info!

    --
    --
    The last digit of pi is four.
  81. Intuit "Tax Freedom Project"-Write Off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I know Intuit and others will have a hissy-fit about their profits taking a hit, but too fucking bad. I shouldn't have to spend around $50 a year to buy a piece of software just to file my taxes."

    Write it off on next years taxes.

    1. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project"-Write Off. by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 1

      "Write [the price of this year's tax prep program] off on next years taxes."

      Great. Considering he likely pays around 25% in income tax, a $50 tax program really costs $63 ... but with your generous advice to write it off, he actually gets to not pay the extra $12 in taxes, only the $50 actual price.

      Real smart response to someone observing that, due to the insane complexity of tax code, the gov't should provide tax software for $0.

      --
      Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    2. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project"-Write Off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but with your generous advice to write it off, he actually gets to not pay the extra $12 in taxes, only the $50 actual price."

      Would you prefer he not get the money back, smart guy?

      "Real smart response to someone observing that, due to the insane complexity of tax code, the gov't should provide tax software for $0."

      Well you do that, freedom force. In the mean time all of us are going to be more practical, and get what we're suppose to back.

    3. Re:Intuit "Tax Freedom Project"-Write Off. by strobert · · Score: 1

      In addition you can only write it off if the dollar amount is at least a certain percentage of your income (I think that category is 2%).

  82. Alabama has it right by Burdell · · Score: 1

    The Alabama standard form and schedules are done in fillable PDFs that have the proper fields linked together and calculating. You enter the numbers from your various statements into the correct fields and then Acrobat does the calculations. They even set up the form to print a 2-D barcode of all the filled-in data so that entering your form into their computer takes one quick scan.

    However, it doesn't seem to work in Acrobat 5.x under Linux, so I'll still have to fire up Windows on something. Then I can use Acrobat Reader 7 so I can save the filled in form (since v7 isn't available for Linux quite yet).

    1. Re:Alabama has it right by msbsod · · Score: 1

      Now, is the IRS going to accept that you cannot complete the PDF junk because of the Adobe update games? I would be happy with the Wintel crap à la Adobe if the IRS would send me a blank check in return for a blank PDF file.

  83. Call me cheap also... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    In the past I....

    1. Did forms by hand
    2. Download PDF... Print to TIFF [pre PDF years I just scanned in the form]
    3. Copy and pasted the numbers from their "write their numbers like this" to the boxes
    4. Submit

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  84. not software, semantic markup by geg81 · · Score: 1

    What we need first of all is for the IRS to create an XML language and semantic model of the tax forms. That markup should specify what gets added up how, define what goes into individual fields, etc. That way, we can create open source tools that work year after year, even if the taxcode changes, not only for filing taxes, but also for analyzing and verifying tax returns, as well as analyzing the tax code and the tax forms themselves.

    1. Re:not software, semantic markup by wwahammy · · Score: 1

      my understanding is that the IRS does have some type of XML language to describe tax form preparation and filing. There's a very complex set of procedures you need to go through to allow an organization/company to actually do the filing of the taxes which is where things get complex.

    2. Re:not software, semantic markup by concordeonetwo · · Score: 1

      The United States Postal Service has a XML API you can use to intergrate into any software or website you write so you can calcuate shipping costs and print labels. If the USPS can do that, I imagine its possible for the IRS to create some sort of XML Tax API.

  85. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sales tax thing is annoying, but something you get used to. It's not difficult to add a few percent mentally. Or, you can move to Oregon where there is no sales tax at all...

    With respect to state-controlled tax returns, this probably wouldn't be possible without significantly simplifying the admittedly byzantine tax codes. As it is, there are so many obscure deductions and rules it simply wouldn't be efficient for the government to handle it all. Consider this an example of distributed computation.

  86. Five simple words: by scottv67 · · Score: 2, Informative


    Turbo Tax For the Web.

    http://www.turbotax.com/

    Why are people talking about buying and *installing* software? Just use the freakin web version.

    I've filed electronically using TTFTW for the past couple of years (both state and fed). Return goes directly into my checking account via EFT.

    Cost is under $50 to file both fed and state. Can't beat it with a stick.

    -Scott

    1. Re:Five simple words: by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1
      Something about sharing my tax information with the people at Intuit doesn't sit well with me. If they want my data for marketing, the least they could do is make it free. But it'd still be too expensive in terms of privacy for me. I'll electronically file as soon as the feds start taking them directly, or at least through a contractor an officer of which will go to federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison if data are sold.

      My state (MO) offers free electronic filing directly. This is what the feds should be doing, but they're more worried about protecting their "partners" than providing service to the taxpayer.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    2. Re:Five simple words: by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      > But it'd still be too expensive in terms of privacy for me.

      Mr. Goat, I agree with your privacy concerns. Filing through a non-governmental agency does come with a certain amount of risk.

      However, in the recent past, have you:

      1) Purchased a new car by financing part of the cost (i.e. not paying cash for the whole thing)?
      2) Built/purchased a new home?
      3) Refinanced your mortgage?

      The list is not comprehensive, just a few of the most intrusive transactions I can think of. When you finance a car, build/buy a new house, or refinance your mortage, it seems like you have to provide almost too much financial data about yourself.

      It's an odd feeling to hand over a stack of papers that basically represent the entire financial side of your life to a person you just met so you can get another 0.5% off that 30-year mortgage.

      My point is that while I agree with your concerns about privacy, there are other transactions that we encounter which ask for a lot more information about our personal life and we are at the mercy of the companys we deal with to keep that information confidential.

      -Scott

    3. Re:Five simple words: by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1
      Mr. Scott (Star Trek reference :)?),

      You make an excellent point--and I've participated in two the transactions you described. But I don't see the point in adding one more. Also, with respect to a good number of those transactions, banking privacy laws like GLB provide at least nominal protection.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  87. Re:I posit a dichotomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody without a sense of humor should have to pay double.

    So that would ba all the repulicans. Hum I think that idea even better now :-P

  88. The system goes up on the 18th. by edanshekar · · Score: 2, Informative

    The IRS.gov site mentions sytem upgrades being completed by the 18th, that will allow for the e-filing of your 2004 taxes. As per the free, H&R Block and a number of other companies will allow you to e-file for free if you make under a certain amount of money, et al. I'm not sure about state taxes as FL has no state income tax.

  89. Re:Taxes? Huh! by demaria · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are some places, mostly fast or quick service food, that include taxes in the price. Businesses won't go for it because then the product looks more expensive. Deception in numbers.

    Taxes are automatically taken out of the paychecks of all but self employed people in the US. The problem is that an employer can't take out the exact amount from your paycheck because we don't have flat tax brackets, and have tax deductions. A part time job in addition to your main one may bump you up to a higher tax bracket. Your employer won't know how many dollars you deducted in mortgage interest, student loan interest, medical expenses and so forth. Most middle class and poor people either get a refund or end up paying a small amount at tax time.

    If we had a flat tax or got rid of deductions, then the need to file would be almost nonexistent.

  90. Excel ? by bmajik · · Score: 1

    I've done my taxes by hand using excel for the last few years. All you need is a spreadsheet with basic IF(..), MIN, SUM, +, and multiple-sheet referencing capabilities (i.e. im sure wahtever spreadsheet people want to go through the pain of using on linux will work fine..)

    All of the boxes you fill out on a 1040 have a number, just make column A row N hold the value for line N of the 1040. If it's a multi-box line (i.e. 5a, 5b, 5c) then use A5, B5, C5 on the spreadsheet to hold those values. If it's a computed column (write the value of blah + blah here) then embed the formula into the column.

    My tax return involves 1040, Sch A, Sch B, and Sch D most years. I put each schedule on its own worksheet in excel, and then reference them between sheets.

    Interestingly enough i have a book on software testing that talks about testing the 1040 form, as written in english language. In the authors opinion the 1040 form has LOTS of bugs in it.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  91. Cost of the IRS by rcw-home · · Score: 1
    I think I remember reading that about half of the revenue that the IRS takes in is used in IRS overhead.

    If that were true, the IRS's overhead would be almost one trillion dollars for 2004.

    Searching google for "united states budget" pulls up the Office of Management and Budget page. Clicking on the budget for 2005 and then "Department of the Treasury" reveals the Internal Revenue Service's overhead was more like $10 billion, or about $45 per tax return.

    Compare that to the Department of Defense's $433 billion outlay for 2004 or Social Security's $492 billion.

  92. govworks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where's govworks gone?

  93. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    = snip =
    Here in Ireland (and in the rest of the EU) your tax is automatically taken out of your paycheck and you don't need to worry about filling in tax returns every year unless you run a business. It seems bizarre to me (and the 350 million other Europeans) that all you American folk still have to fill in your own tax returns; surely our way is better?
    = snip =

    Well here in the US taxes are also automatically taken out of your paycheck. But then you get to declare thousands of dollars of your income as being exempt and deduct it. Now the IRS knows you'll do this but they don't know exactly how many thousands you personally can exempt. It depends on your house payments, how much you gave to charities, and so on. So they try to come close and then you fix the difference at tax time. I'll take the US system and pocket the thousands of dollars saved in taxes, thanks.

    = snip =
    Here in the EU it's law that shops have to advertise a VAT-inclusive tax so that when you get to the counter you pay the advertised price, not the price plus 10-20% sales tax. How do you guys put up with that?
    = snip =

    It's the price plus around 4% sales tax, varies by state. What would you put up with in exchange for 15% lower taxes on goods?

  94. IRS should public in Rules, not english-Interpret. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "IRS rules, like all Federal Agency law, is available in machine formats. "

    Now try interpreting them. That's were the money goes when one buys tax software. That's also why an OSS solution will not work.

  95. I do it by hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first time I did my taxes it was one page, I did it by hand.

    After a while I became self-employed. It ended up 3-4 pages. I figured out the new forms, did it by hand. Even the estimated tax penalty stuff.

    Started itemizing deductions..add a page.

    After a while had some stock investments. 2 more pages. Still doing it by hand.

    Invested in some real estate investment trusts. Those bad boys throw off about a zillion kinds of income (but lots of it!). Non-qualified dividends, return of capital, unrecaptured sec.1250 gains, long term gains, short term gains, 5-year gains, blah blah. Taxes are getting more complicated.. still doing it by hand.

    Started some foreign investments (if you were invested in european companies the past few years, congratulations).. gotta fill out another form for foreign tax paid. By hand of course.

    At this point I'm such a tax-form-filling-out badass I be like Herbert Kornfeld an' his teecha CPA-ONE.

    Of course I'm kinda of unique. I *like* filling out forms. Tax time is fun. I won't admit it in public though.

    But you wanted to know how folks do it....

    1. Re:I do it by hand by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1
      At this point I'm such a tax-form-filling-out badass I be like Herbert Kornfeld an' his teecha CPA-ONE.

      The mo-fo's at Payables be 'bout to punk yo' Accounts Re-ceevin' ass.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  96. Re:Taxes? Huh! by jaxdahl · · Score: 1

    If it were a flat tax, it'd be simple to take out the correct amount -- but that doesn't happen. If you overpay your taxes, you get a refund -- usually happens. But if you miscalculate your exemptions or amount that'll you earn that year and your employer doesn't take out the proper amount, causing you to underpay your taxes - you'll get hit with interest and possibily penalties.

  97. Re:Taxes? Huh! by ksheff · · Score: 2, Informative

    People that work for a company usually have their taxes withheld from their paycheck too. However, not everyone is paid that way, may have their own business, a part time job, working spouse, etc. All of those can throw off what taxes you have to pay. Also, the Feds and the individual states do have their own specific tax forms. They've existed for decades. What the original poster is complaining about it is for electronic filing. In that case the IRS has not come up with their own Java or cross platform app to do any of this. Instead, it lets software companies come up with their own tax software that I assume has to follow some guidelines the IRS has set.

    Now concerning sales taxes, there is a good reason to not include the tax in the price: not everyone pays it. There are some oarganizations/people that have a tax exempt status, so their purchases are not taxable. Also, the amount of tax may be different depending on the product (ie food may be taxed at different rates in different localities than other goods, alcohol at a higher rate, etc). It's also a good in-your-face reminder of how much govt is taking from you. If it's included in the price, the amount of tax is hidden. Fuel is taxed like that and I would guess that the average Joe on the street doesn't have any idea how much he is paying in taxes everytime he fills up his car, but he probably has an idea of what the tax rate is when he goes to the store. Including the tax in the price is a nice way to keep hiking up taxes and mask them as normal price increases.

    I've been to Ireland and didn't really find it's way of handling taxes any easier or 'consumer friendly' than what I've experienced in the states. I was pleased at the VAT refund station at the airport, though. Nice little bonus, but you guys are getting raped.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  98. A SOLUTION: Open Tax Solver! by foobar01 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some googling found me a program called Open Tax Solver. I haven't yet tried it, so I can't really say how good it is.

    A version for this years US Form 1040 has apparently just been uploaded.

  99. Who cares? by alw53 · · Score: 1



    Normally I worry a lot more about how efficient government is at spending money. They could be a lot less efficient at taking it as far as I'm concerned.

  100. Re:Taxes? Huh! by arodland · · Score: 1

    Also, if you overpay your taxes and get a refund, you're lending the government your money for free for all those months -- which might explain why it happens so often :)

  101. Re:Taxes? Huh! by bnenning · · Score: 1

    It seems bizarre to me (and the 350 million other Europeans) that all you American folk still have to fill in your own tax returns; surely our way is better?

    Well, I prefer that taxes are visible so people have some idea of what they're paying to the government, and can better decide whether the benefits are worth it. (On the other hand that doesn't really work in practice here because there are still so many hidden taxes).

    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  102. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally concur!

  103. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    Alright, well most people do get their taxes taken out. The reason people file a tax return is to get the taxes they overpaid back. Yes, it's a dumb system that essentially gives the government an interest free loan. It also gives people the chance to claim any deductions. For people with no dependents making under 50k a year, they can use the 1040EZ which is one page and it's simple to use.

    I download the PDFs and fill out the form my self because I think it's easier than filling 20 forms online when the servers are running slowly.

    As for sales taxes, they are state taxes, not federal. They vary between each of the 50 states. If I buy an item from another state, I don't pay sales tax on it. It's complicated and so I guess to make it easier on all those signs that say $99.99 plus tax. But we get used to it. I know that on everything other than groceries and clothing, I'll pay an extra 6%. If the price is 99 cents, I know it's going to be $1.05. You just get used to it I guess.

    And I think the complexity from the tax system is to benefit the government. They keep a LOT of money each year from people who are too lazy to file a return.

  104. Re:Taxes? Huh! by akratic · · Score: 1

    Most Americans' taxes are taken out of their paychecks. But the amount that's withheld is only an estimate. The exact amounts people owe depend on things that an employer couldn't be expected to know, such as how much they earn on investments and how much they donate to charity. (If you donate money to certain charitable organizations, you can deduct the donations from your income when you calculate your tax.) Americans file income tax returns in order to tell the government about non-wage income and to take deductions. If the amount withheld from wages wasn't exactly right (it rarely is), we pay the difference or receive refunds

    So, now I'm curious--does Ireland have no taxes on interest and other investment income? If investment income is taxed, who has to figure the tax? I don't see how the bank could figure the tax, unless you have a flat income tax rate. Banks don't necessarily know how much their customers earn from work, so they couldn't apply the right tax rate to the interest they pay their customers.

  105. A great Java tax app with very unfortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faggotty Tax Pro, Ka Ka Edition.

  106. Re:Taxes? Huh! by cookiepus · · Score: 1

    Here in Ireland (and in the rest of the EU) your tax is automatically taken out of your paycheck and you don't need to worry about filling in tax returns every year unless you run a business. It seems bizarre to me (and the 350 million other Europeans) that all you American folk still have to fill in your own tax returns; surely our way is better?

    Others have begun to explain this, but it goes a bit further than having secondary income. For example, in the US higher education is not free, but people recieve tax credits for paying their own or a child's tuition. The employer cannot provide that exemption since he has no idea how many kids I have in college and whether they're enrolled in a 4 year accredited university or not. Also, the employer does not know about any charitable donations I have done - which I can write off of my taxes. Also, the government encourages us to save for retirement through tax-exept contributions to IRA (don't get excited my Irish pal, it stands for Individual Retirement Account) accounts. Since whether a person funds an IRA or not, and how much, is not known to an employer, but the person later on can go back and have that amount of money subtracted from the amount that he is being taxed on.

    Additionally there are lots of little wrinkles like this in the tax code, and everyone is affected by at least one or two. Certainly there's been a lot of effort to simplify this, but I am not sure if that's a 100% good thing. Certainly the government should encourage us to behave in certain ways (getting an education, saving for retirement, donating clothes to the needy, etc) so it's complex by necessity. Though of course it can use improvement.

  107. Re:Taxes? Huh! by hey! · · Score: 1

    Well, in some ways it is silly that people have to file, since taxes are withheld from wages. If you're a little guy, you have nothing to hide (or at least nothing you can hide).

    But we have a complicated tax code. The upside is, it is possible to cut the amount of taxes you pay a little bit if you're willing to work a bit, which wouldn't be possible if it were just a matter of letting the government take the money out of your paycheck.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  108. H&R Block by rscrawford · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When my wife and I started acquiring investments and stock, we realized that things had just gotten too complicated for us; at one point, we did our taxes three times, and got three different results.

    So, we've had them done by H&R Block for the past three years, and we'll be using them this year as well.

    --
    -- The reason it's called the right wing? Irony.
  109. Tax programs are like IDEs for programming by hey! · · Score: 1

    They help because the system is crufty and hard to understand, but they aren't strictly necessary.

    Actually, WRT to doing your own taxes, spreadsheets work fine; you just set up the formulas as you go along the same as if you were doing it by hand. It's easier and a bit more interesting than doing it by hand. You can even usually use almost of last year's spreadsheets, since the forms don't really change that much.

    You don't get the magic pixie dust that supposedly figures out how to reduce your taxes, but I don't believe in that stuff. It's better in my opinion to read the instructions, or if you don't understand part of them, consult a real expert.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  110. Use a CPA, they are nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had good experiences with joe blow CPA. Two fellows in particular (one for the biz and one for me)

  111. Re:Taxes? Huh! by maryjanecapri · · Score: 0

    it's very simple - our country (the US) is run by greed. if the government actually did something that made sense they would be putting a lot of people out of work. and heaven forefend they do that. i wish we could move to a much simpler system. for a number of reasons - such as the rich wouldn't be able to buy themselves a ton of loopholes with the help of high-powered tax attorneys and consultants. the US is so totally corrupted by greed that there's probably little to no hope for us ever becoming enlightened enough to realize that maybe less is more.

    --
    nature loves variety::society hates it get your variety at http://www.monkeypantz.net
  112. I don't expect one by cookiepus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't expect there to be a free Turbo Tax / Tax Cut equivalent. The idea of free software, as I understand it, anyway, is you make a program that you use, and you just give it to others because you think they may find it helpful.

    This cannot happen with tax software. If you understand the tax code thoroughly, you're going to easily know exactly which forms to fill out in a specific year. And you would be an accountant, not a programmer.

    Basically a programmer isn't going to sit down and write a program to do their taxes because by the time they know how to do their taxes, why would they write a program to do it?

    This is why it takes a commercial entity to say "Ok, we have the know-how and the programmers to put this thing together, and we know people will buy it" -- god bless them because I've been using either Turbo Tax or Tax Cut for many of the past few years, and every time it has saved me money.

    Certainly these companies can probably increase their sales a bit by making Linux binaries of their software, but don't expect them to give away the source to something they've invested so much $ in and depend on sales of to make money.

    Coincidentally, I don't mean this post to be deragotary towards Open Source people, but am I wrong that no one is going to start a project for code that he himself isn't going to use?

    1. Re:I don't expect one by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you understand the tax code thoroughly, you're going to easily know exactly which forms to fill out in a specific year. And you would be an accountant, not a programmer.

      I know the tax codes thoroughly, and I'm a professional tax preparer and programmer.

      Coincidentally, I don't mean this post to be deragotary towards Open Source people, but am I wrong that no one is going to start a project for code that he himself isn't going to use?

      I started one a few years ago, when I had a lot more time on my hands (of course my intention was to be able to use it, but as it turns out I just buy my e-file software for now, it's cheaper than writing the software myself). I abandoned it, largely because I suck at writing GUIs (it was basically my first attempt at using GTK). If a few people want to help me try again, I'm sure we could get something done in time for 2005s taxes (even if it's just the 1040-EZ, it'll generate enough interest to move forward). The specs are out there, but the work is tedious. If you're in, contact me at taxman@inbox.org.

    2. Re:I don't expect one by zcat_NZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if there's a bug? If even a minor fraction of your end users are, because of a mistake you made, systematically undercalculating their tax the IRS is likely to be upset at the potential loss of revenue and/or the extra work required to find and correct these returns. I wouldn't want to be in that position.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    3. Re:I don't expect one by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Informative

      What if there's a bug?

      Then you have the source, and can fix it. You think there aren't bugs in professional tax preparation software? As a tax preparer, I can tell you with certainty there are. In fact, what originally sent me to creating this software was the fact that there were so many bugs in the original e-file software my father and I used that he went back to filing the stuff by hand for his clients (pencil, paper, and calculator).

      The initial target market would have to be the tax professional, anyway.

      If even a minor fraction of your end users are, because of a mistake you made, systematically undercalculating their tax the IRS is likely to be upset at the potential loss of revenue and/or the extra work required to find and correct these returns.

      Systematic errors will easily be caught. In fact, the IRS makes you run a bunch of test cases before they'll even let you submit, and surely the most common errors would show up then. Furthermore, all the calculations are checked by the computer after you submit, and you find out within 3 days if your return was accepted or reject. Yes, it's going to piss the hell out of your customers when your submission fails and their refund gets delayed, especially since those filing electronically are those who care most about getting a fast refund, but this is exactly what happened the first time around with a high priced e-filing software that we bought. A rather large number of customers were permanently lost as a result before my dad went back to pencil and paper and I resorted to printing out the returns that year. We got a refund for the software, but most of those customers involved never came back.

      I wouldn't want to be in that position.

      Well, then don't be an ERO, software developer, or transmitter. These people make money because they're willing to do this. It should be noted that the transmission is completely separate from the creation of the electronic return. At first it would be smartest to only focus on the creation of the electronic return, and then submit it to a transmitter who would check the data and resubmit.

      It's unlikely e-filing will ever be completely free of cost because of this. You can't transmit directly to the IRS. You send the return to a licensed transmitter who then transmits to the IRS in a batch job. You're going to probably have to pay at least a dollar or two to the transmitter.

    4. Re:I don't expect one by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Good reply, very informative! And good luck with your project. There are relatively few areas left where there's no viable OSS alternative to commercial software, and it's always good to see people attending to these!

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    5. Re:I don't expect one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someone could make tax software that they give away for personal use, but charge for professional use. So, the accountants pay something for it, but the home user does not. And you could make more $$ by offering support contracts. Imagine H&R Block buying this...you'd have it made.
      But, another idea I had is to simply (!) create a spreadsheet that has all of the possible types of income, and all of the possible deductions (with annotations for forms and line numbers) that does all the calculations for you. So you fill in the spreadsheet, copy the data to the right places in the different forms and have the calculations all done for you. Sure, not the level of TurboTax or TaxCut, but probably good enough for most people.

  113. TaxAct Online is free, $10 e-file, $16 with state by Botos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.taxactonline.com/

    Entirely web-based; I've been using it to e-file under Linux for two years. If you just want hardcopy, it's actually free.

  114. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  115. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our tax system sucks but it will be better than the evil hidden VAT tax when Bush gets it reformed.

  116. Re:If the IRS is anything like the UK Inland Reven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the mid-90's, online (web-based, even) tax completion software was developed by a group at NTIS for the IRS.

    All was good until the tax prep'ers got wind of it. Then, following millions of dollars of investment (and a pretty much completed project) the whole thing was scrapped.

    Welcome to the United States of Corporate America.

  117. Write your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why is it that every year slashdot has this type of post about what type of open source/linux-compatible tax software? What happened to the idea of the FSS/OSS movement that if a piece of software doesn't exist, then someone can write it? Why hasn't anyone written this software?

    Guess they're too busy bashing M$.

  118. ob: write your own by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    though, haveing not actually read all of the documentation, the IRS want's this to be easy...
    take a look at http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=118575,00.h tml apropriately titled "e-file for Software Developers/Transmitters"

    maybe someone with some more time, and experiance than I should take a crack at it

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    1. Re:ob: write your own by davmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have read all the documentation.

      One could create open software to calculate taxes and spit out the forms with the appropriate blocks filled in. You would then sign the forms and mail them in the usual 'dead tree' fashion.

      But there are so many hoops you have to jump through for your software to be allowed to offer electronic filing that a true open source alternative is simply not realistic. You can't just slap a program together using a certain data structure, throw it up on the net, and announce "Here it is, folks!"

      For starters, if Joe Schmuck downloaded the source and recompiled it (whether he made any changes or not), the binaries would then have to be resubmitted and Joe Schmuck would have to then also jump through all those hoops.

      The best one could do, given IRS regulations, is created a closed-source binaries only (just like Windows) Linux soloution for electronic filing. And I doubt seriously anyone is going to want to do the aforementioned federal hoop jumping (which includes background checks for some software authoring company employees and/or the company itself) and then give the program away for free.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    2. Re:ob: write your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The best one could do, given IRS regulations, is created a closed-source binaries only (just like Windows) Linux soloution for electronic filing. And I doubt seriously anyone is going to want to do the aforementioned federal hoop jumping (which includes background checks for some software authoring company employees and/or the company itself) and then give the program away for free.

      Or, the IRS could provide an open source client to do everything for you and could distribute binaries. (The easiest way to do this would be to write it in Java and then distribute a JAR file, but there are other ways.)

      If the IRS is going to try to force everyone to file electronically, they owe it to the nation to provide free software to make it happen. It's not like the US government is too poor to make this happen; even if it took a team of 100 programmers working full-time year round, that's still a tiny fraction of the number of people the IRS employs just to do data entry from paper forms.

  119. Re:Taxes? Huh! by vocaro · · Score: 1
    Here in Ireland (and in the rest of the EU) your tax is automatically taken out of your paycheck

    That's how it works over here, too. But over here we have tax deductions, which is basically an attempt by the government to promote certain activities that would benefit the social good. (I would have thought that the EU has something similar?)

    For instance, if you pay your tuition for higher education, you can deduct the expense and don't have to pay tax on it (in most circumstances). You also don't have to pay tax on charitable contributions, excessive medical expenses, mortgage interest on a new home, etc. Many states also use tax deductions to encourage certain activities that help to protect the environment, for example. Filing a return makes sure that you get the tax deductions you are owed.

    Also, not everyone gets a paycheck. Millions of Americans are self-employed, so they need to file a return in order to pay their fair share of tax. How does the EU handle this situation?

    Furthermore, there are many situations in which filing a return will benefit the taxpayer. I'm not sure how it works in the the EU, but over here if you earn below a certain amount of income, you don't pay any income taxes at all. For instance, your employer might be deducting tax from your paycheck, but after six months you quit in order to go back to school full-time. You would then be able to file a return and get back all that tax you had paid, since for the year overall you are in a lower tax bracket.

    I have heard that the IRS owes taxpayers billions of dollars because of situations like this, but they are unable to do anything about it because the people who would receive this money do not file returns.

  120. Not if you use MSWind for games by HiThere · · Score: 1

    If you use MSWind for games, or other not tax preparation uses, you can only deduct the percentage of the time that you use it for tax preparation.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    1. Re:Not if you use MSWind for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on how "honest" you are with your CPA and the IRS.

    2. Re:Not if you use MSWind for games by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      A script which deletes all traces of everything other than tax stuff is relatively easy to construct. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Not if you use MSWind for games by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      Someone's getting an audit this year...

      Your Pal,
      The IRS

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    4. Re:Not if you use MSWind for games by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Someone's out of your jurisdiction...

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  121. Re:Taxes? Huh! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    Couple things: 'enlightened' is how you percieve yourself, it's now how you actually are.
    Secondly, your signature is correct, to a point. If your bicycle is slowing down traffic, it has no place on that road. I see too many imbeciles riding bikes trying to cause wrecks by riding down highways with no adequate shoulder or area for them to ride. And there are tons of bike paths that you can use that cars aren't permitted on. Other than that, have fun on your bike.

  122. Incredible amount of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I happen to work for a company that makes tax software. It's a ton of work. A tax analyst (typically a CPA) and programmer team will typically have between 2 and 4 states, plus there is a team of a dozen or so that spend full time all getting approved forms (the forms must be very, very precise since they are usually optically scanned). There is a team of a dozen or so doing underlying programming for the system in general. The federal system has a half dozen people dealing with it specifically. All these people are doing this full time.
    This is not even mentioning the fact that we have a lot of integrated accounting systems that interface with it, because those don't interest you.

    If you're implying that some community should do this, I just don't see how it can happen. The knowledge is quite specialized and a ton of work is needed on a recurring basis. A LOT of testing must be done. People probably will not be willing to use a system unless there's some liability on the part of the authors.

    If you're saying that the government should provide the software, good luck. The states are all WOEFULLY understaffed; with the budget cuts in the last few years, many states have had their taxing agencies practically decimated. Most lost a lot of staff, some lost most of theirs. The remaining staff is hideously overworked, and there's practically zero programmer time available.

    What's the incentive for the government to push for something like this? There are already good products on the market, and they don't have to lift a finger to do it. If they did go thorough all that work, they'd be taking business away from companies, and they'd be taking on liability themselves for incorrect programming.

    1. Re:Incredible amount of work by ckedge · · Score: 1

      > I happen to work for a company that makes tax software. It's a ton of work.

      Right, and why is this work being done 10 times over by 10 different companies, and then we are all being charged $30 to pay for it!!!!

      Are you claiming that the government couldn't produce a Java or Web tax system for less than $200,000,000 per year!??!??

      Here in Canada the provincial and federal governments co-operate in producing the forms/calculations, which means the provinces send their numbers/rates/paperwork/etc to the Feds who write up combined tax forms for each province. The feds collect *all* the tax, then transfer the provincial tax to the provinces.

      However we've got the same idiotic situation in that 3-6 private companies are duplicating each other's effort in creating software, and then charging us $20-$40 a pop for the shit. All this when the federal government could simply do the job itself and save us $50,000,000 plus per year (minus their costs).

      (Here in Canada the tax software you buy creates a government format regulated ".tax" file that you upload over ssl to the federal tax website. Even web-tax-software creates and .tax download for you that you then upload by yourself to the federal government.)

    2. Re:Incredible amount of work by ckedge · · Score: 1

      Forgot to answer this simple question

      > What's the incentive for the government to push for something like this?

      To serve the public's common interest - which is to save us all a bunch of fucking money!!!

      Seriously, the power of software is that you only need to produce 1 working copy and then you can give it to an infinite number of people for near zero cost.

      But nooooo, we've gotta pay for sales and marketing and pretty boxcovers and wholesale and retail markup at the local store and 10 different companies to implement the same damn thing.

      I really am sorry, but society should be employing you to do something *ELSE* productive, instead of doing what you are now.

    3. Re:Incredible amount of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody seriously expects this for state taxes, just federal.

      I don't think anybody wants the gov't to provide the software.

      If this were done once, it could be adjusted with less effort for year to year changes.

    4. Re:Incredible amount of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You're saying that there should only be one entity performing each function in society, and that should be regulated by government? How socialist of you.

      So the government should write a new operating system, office suite, etc, and give them away for free. They should also take over all wholesale and retail distribution and standardize everything. Also all technology, etc should be standardized by the government. No more individual innovation for you, buddy! (Yes, there IS innovation in the tax software industry. The basic calculations are set by regulations, but there's a lot of competition for ease-of-use functions).

      By the way, I've worked a lot with the IRS and state DOR's over the years, and I do NOT want them writing the software that calculates my taxes. I'll do it by hand first.

    5. Re:Incredible amount of work by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      Good luck convincing right wing Americans the the federal government should be allowed to collect money owed to the states.

      It would take about 10 minutes for one of them to accuse you of plotting to let the UN collect their property taxes to fund local schools, which would immediately be forced to teach all of the kids that Islam is the One True Religion and that everyone should participate in homosexual orgies (and don't even think about trying to convince them that those 2 ideas would contradict one another--it's an article of faith that fundamentalist Muslims are secretly liberal secular humanists.)

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  123. Being US, the government knows everything by twitter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As a US citizen, I can say the same things.

    All my earnings are reported, all my tax breaks pre-calculculated, interest reported by the banks. Only thing I have to add are tax deductible donations like Red Cross stuff.

    It could Take me about 15 seconds to do my taxes.

    I have NO privacy in my life, but it is not easy.

    Really, Uncle Sam gets reports from everyone and "voluntary compliance" is a fiction. Even charities have forms to fill out.

    My wife thinks they should have a web site that has the forms filled out and a little button, "I agree" or "make changes". The I agree button would take all of no seconds to push and Uncle Sam knows where my money is, so the next screen should present payment options. Make changes should let you enter things they might not know about, which would be rare, or let you file a complaint that a human being actually has to look at.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by QuessFan · · Score: 1

      The decentralized system in U.S. works against this.

      For example, marriage status has major implication on tax. And how does IRS find that out under U.S. system?

      In many country, there are centralized people registration system, so it's not that hard for tax authorities to use the same information.

      In U.S., most marriages are registered at county level. Some state mandate county register to report those to state, some do not. Even if counties and states share those information with IRS, you still have to deal with the issue of common law marriage. I.e. if two people says they are married, lives together for a certain period, etc. they are recognized as married with any notification to any government agency.

      There are some other similiar small differences. Not a big issues in their own. But they do add up.

    2. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you are a employee I guess what you say applies quite well here in the U.S. But, for me, as a self-employed businessman with my fingers in numerous pies, my taxes are anything but.

      Being in business for myself means there's a qualitative judgement for every expense: is it a "business expense"? I have numerous computers, one of which I spent 4 hours in the past year checking my email. Is the purchase of that computer a business expense?

      I travelled to the Bay this year, with my kids, to visit the Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum. During this trip, I met with a potential client. Is this a business trip?

      I have many, many times in the past not deducted legitimate business expenses, and purposely paid additional taxes, to "raise" my income in order to qualify for loans when buying property. It's often advantageous to pay a few hundred or thousand to get a property, or qualify for funding for XYZ business loan.

      It's a routine - my accountant calls me as soon as he receives our tax stuff for the year and asks me: "More income, or lower taxes?".

      Heck, when times were hard, I've even counted borrowed money as income!

      I usually have about 100% flexibility - I usually have a 100% range (EG: $75,000 - $150,000 per year) in income I can claim depending on what I decide to call a "business expense".

      This year, I'm going for low taxes - my actual income has raised nicely this last year, and I have no particular ambitions to buy real estate. Thus, I want to deduct everything I can think of. I'd write off my kids' allowance this year if my accountant can cook up a justifiable way to do so. Given a simple, written agreement that they sign to "clean Dad's office weekly", I can do so.

      If preparing your taxes takes less than a week (by yourself or your book-keeper) you are a wage-slave, and I genuinely feel for you. There's a clear sense of purpose and control when you run your own business - it'd be damn hard to convince me I want a "boss"....

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    3. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you still have to deal with the issue of common law marriage. I.e. if two people says they are married, lives together for a certain period, etc. they are recognized as married with any notification to any government agency.

      Bullshit, there is nothing about a commonlaw marriage that says you have to live together for a certian period. The idea of commonlaw marriage is that you have to present yourself as a married couple.

    4. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      In many states, if you live with someone of the opposite sex for a certain amount of time (usually 7 years I think), then you're automatically "married" in the eyes of the State. Depending again on where you live, that can suddenly mean that that woman you've been living with owns half your property.

      Gotta love those backwards US laws...

    5. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife thinks they should have a web site that has the forms filled out and a little button, "I agree" or "make changes". The I agree button would take all of no seconds to push and Uncle Sam knows where my money is, so the next screen should present payment options. Make changes should let you enter things they might not know about, which would be rare, or let you file a complaint that a human being actually has to look at.

      Well, I have to say I like the system in finland these days: you get a pre-filled form with everything the government got from banks etc., with a suggestion for your taxation based on this information. If you don't have anything to add you can just forget it, and if there are errors or missing information you can fill it in and return it for normal examination. Most don't have to do any changes: you can always try to save a little and add all your professional costs like books, computers and such as deductible items, that's it for most of us.

    6. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by apanap · · Score: 1

      My wife thinks they should have a web site that has the forms filled out and a little button, "I agree" or "make changes". The I agree button would take all of no seconds to push and Uncle Sam knows where my money is, so the next screen should present payment options. Make changes should let you enter things they might not know about, which would be rare, or let you file a complaint that a human being actually has to look at.

      That's more or less exactly the way we have it in Sweden, using an electronic ID that you can get from online-banks to identify yourself. Works like a charm! You can of course still use the old pen and paper, but you get pre-filled in forms for that too. Only the hardcore use blank forms.

      --
      Give me a job. Please?
    7. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by infolib · · Score: 3, Insightful
      My wife thinks they should have a web site that has the forms filled out and a little button, "I agree" or "make changes".

      It works like that in Denmark. When you get your tax form it has an account of taxes paid/due and a password for the tax department web site. If it's complete you won't have to lift a finger, if you have unreported income/deductions you can fill out the form through www, the phone (voice response) or simple snail mail. The privacy implications are staggering, but I try to keep the concerns confined to the back of my mind. Heh.

      Anyways, the NO PRIVACY is not completely true, there's privacy enough for lots of untaxed "black work". Ask any dane.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    8. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by pthisis · · Score: 1

      In many states, if you live with someone of the opposite sex for a certain amount of time (usually 7 years I think), then you're automatically "married" in the eyes of the State.

      I call BS. Name one such state.

      AFAIK, there are currently 11 states (and the District of Columbia--also, New Hampshire recognizes it only for inheritance purposes) that recognize common-law marriage, but it requires a whole lot more than just living together.

      The exact requirements vary, but typically you have to:

      1. Live together for a significant amount of time.
      2. Intend to be (currently) married
      3. Represent to the community that you are married--e.g. use the words husband and wife publically to the community, actually tell people you're married, file taxes jointly, etc.

      The amount of time to satisfy (1) is undefined in most places and often 3 years if specified--I have no idea where the 7 years myth started.

      Some states actually require a signed statement of intent to satisfy (2). Some states don't require proof of (2) (considering (1) and (3) to be sufficient proof of (2) unless there is evidence disproving (2)).

      Typical proof of (3) is the female taking the male's last name, or using "Mr and Mrs Smith" as a mailing address (even if the name hasn't been legally changed), etc.

      Interestingly, being engaged is normally acceptable proof that you do NOT intend to be currently married (you wouldn't ask someone to marry you in the future if you were already married) and hence proof that you are not married under common law.

      Also note that there is no such thing as a common-law divorce but in some jurisdictions there is a statute of limitations to establish the common law marriage--in such a state, a couple might satisfy (1), (2), and (3) but if they moved apart for over a year (or whatever the local jurisdiction was) and neither party brought the suit within that time period then no common-law marriage would be established.

      The common-law marriage statutes are intended to help out couples who don't have access to legal marriage--they write up a letter stating their intent, change their name, and live together and they're married. They're not intended to entrap people "living in sin" into an unwanted marriage.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    9. Re:Being US, the government knows everything by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      After doing a little googling, it seems you're right. One site did say there's a persistent myth that people cohabiting for 7 years are automatically married though. My question now is: where did this myth come from, and why does it persist? I certainly believed it.

  124. www.taxact.com by Dr.+Blue · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out TaxACT. The basic "fill in the forms" version is free -- you print the resulting forms and mail them in, and it doesn't cost you anything. You can e-file for $7.95. No, it's not free, but come on -- under $8? You can barely see a movie for that these days.

    The deluxe edition is only $9.95, and it is more thorough if you have things that can give you tax breaks. I'm doing the deluxe version this year, but did the standard one last year -- I started out thinking I'd print and just do it for free, but then realized that the convenience of e-file for $8 really can't be beat...

    Since it's web-based, it works fine from Linux. One problem I had (and I've had with another web site as well): for some bizarre reason, the first screen, with the user agreement, looked entirely blank -- it was really just white text rendered on a white background. Strange. It came up fine in konqueror and firefox though, and once you get past that first screen everything seems to work fine in Mozilla (it did force me to install Firefox though, which is actually a good thing).

    Anyway, sorry to sound like an ad, but I like it, and I like that I can use it under Linux. It gives my sense of privacy a bit of the willies, but I think you're pretty well protected by law as far as that goes...

  125. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Techiegeeks · · Score: 1
    Here in Ireland (and in the rest of the EU) your tax is automatically taken out of your paycheck and you don't need to worry about filling in tax returns every year unless you run a business. It seems bizarre to me (and the 350 million other Europeans) that all you American folk still have to fill in your own tax returns; surely our way is better?

    Because I am able to get back anywhere from 4 to 5 grand in deductions.

  126. Re:Taxes? Huh! by SagSaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in Ireland (and in the rest of the EU) your tax is automatically taken out of your paycheck

    It works the same way here in the US. Income and other taxes are automatically deducted from my paycheck. However, since income tax is not a flat percent of gross pay, what they deduct from the check will seldom match exactly with what you actually owe in taxes.

    and you don't need to worry about filling in tax returns every year unless you run a business.

    If you don't plan to take a number of itemized deductions, you can fill out the simple tax form, which basically requires you to add up how much money you made, look up in a table how much you owe in taxes on that amount, and then subtract the total amount taken in income taxes from your pay. It took me all of about 10 minutes to do my taxes last year, which included the time to add up the income from four sources.

    Of course, owing to the special-interest and loop-hole filled mess which is the US tax code, you can often pay a bit less in taxes if you take the time to figure out all the deductions you're allowed to take and fill out the longer version of the tax form which lets you itemize your deductions. This can take quite a bit longer.

    --
    Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
  127. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  128. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, why in the name of all that's Holy don't you US folks have state-controlled tax returns yet?

    We don't like state-controlled anything.

    However, most people's taxes require information that the government simply doesn't have. So you fill out your taxes to claim deductions, etc. This is where the taxes get really complicated. The government just doesn't know if you use your SUV (big car) for business, or if your employer made you buy it, or if it's electric or not. They don't know how many square feet you use for business in your home, or how much income you got as cash for a side business, etc. This is all information you can report on your tax returns to lower your tax (or to raise it and avoid penalties if you happen to be audited).

    It is possible to have the government do your taxes if you don't fall into that category, however. You just basically fill out your name and a couple other things and mail it in. Very few people do this however. Even the people that could do it probably don't trust the government enough anyway.

    Here in Ireland (and in the rest of the EU) your tax is automatically taken out of your paycheck and you don't need to worry about filling in tax returns every year unless you run a business.

    Yes, that happens here too. (Actually I'm self-employed so I pay quarterly tax payments instead, but it's similar in spirit). Then at the end of the year you figure out if the government owes you or if you owe them by fiddling all these little details.

    not the price plus 10-20% sales tax. How do you guys put up with that?

    Different states have different sales tax. So probably companies prefer to have their products advertised at the "base" price before taxes.

    What do you Americans think?

    The US tax system is okay, but very complicated. That's because 1) there are lots of special interests tinkering with it and 2) every special interest that wants to add a bonus or penalty for certain behavior has to be sure that it doesn't add any loopholes.

    Example that gave me some headaches last year (yes I do my own taxes by hand):

    The president says "corporate dividends shouldn't be taxed". Okay cool. Fine with me. Companies pay tax on their income, and then WE pay tax on our dividends, so they are "taxed twice". (Unless they are received in a retirement account.)

    The logical thing to do is to eliminate the tax AT THE CORPORATION. However this isn't "politically correct" because it seems to favor corporations (economically it doesn't matter). So they lower them at the taxpayer end. Lower taxes on dividends! Yay!

    No, not really. Because some corporations don't pay taxes on dividends to begin with!!! For example, REITs (a type of real estate operating company). In exchange for paying out most of their cash flow as dividends, REITs pay no taxes (this was done in the sixties or so to encourage real estate investment).

    So the IRS still taxes REIT dividends. They created two classes: qualified (lower tax) and non-qualified (old tax). And they came up with some crazy date-based rules to make sure you held the instrument for the right amount of time. here's a link. They actually screwed up the holding period rules because they are so complicated and had to quickly amend them.

    So what's my point? That every change you make to the taxes requires detailed rules to make sure that there are no loopholes. And then new changes have to take all the other changes into account...etc.. And whenever somebody says something that sounds like it makes things simpler, it really ends up making things more complicated.

    I'm not sure how you could 1) eliminate the complexity of filling out forms and 2) still have a system of rewards and penalties. For instance to give people a tax break on tsunami disaster relief, next year our tax forms will have a special space for tsunami relief donat

  129. Re:Taxes? Huh! by slapout · · Score: 1

    ed to advertise a basic tax-exclusive price on goods.

    The problem is that local sales taxes vary so much here. It would be impossible for a business to advertise a price that included tax. If they put an ad in the paper, people in dozens of tax areas would actually pay a different price.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  130. Re:If the IRS is anything like the UK Inland Reven by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

    In the UK you can file your return online directly with Inland Revenue. The only problem is it sucks to sign up and the forms are not very friendly but it does work. In the US I used one of the free online services to fill out the form and then paid the $10 for submission. The US online forms were way simplier as it asked you plain english questions about your inclome and expenses and had a bunch of online help.

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  131. Use Scribus for linux pdfs by Jack+Action · · Score: 4, Informative

    Scribus is a robust open source desktop publishing app. Editing pdfs is one of its most killer tools.

    1. Re:Use Scribus for linux pdfs by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      Very cool indeed.

      When I build up my new desktop system, I will definitely have to install this.

  132. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you pay out your ass for that "basic *right*" to avoid a blue collar job.

  133. Re:A SOLUTION: Open Tax Solver! by nuxx · · Score: 1

    That's interesting, but it looks like it would take more effort to write the "commented text file" it uses for input than it would be just to fill out the form by hand.

    It's interesting, though.

  134. Re:Taxes? Huh! by bokmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My employer does take out the appropriate amount of taxes, based on a 'witholding' form I fill out, but:

    my employer does not know how much interest I paid on tax deductible loans.

    My employer does not know how much money I gave to charities this year.

    My employer does not know how much I spent on medical expenses (which are deductible)

    MY employer does not know how much money I made or lost in investments this year.

    And I prefer to keep it that way.

    Sales taxes in the U.S. are incredibly complicated. They vary by small region. Most States have a sales tax (in Virginia it is 4.5%), some cities take another 2-3% on top of that, some counties add a percent or two. In some jurisdictions food is not taxable, and in others, 'convenience food' is taxable, but not 'other' food - meaning I can walk into dunkin' donuts and get 1 donut and pay tax, or I can buy a dozen and pay no tax at all. Two identical stores with identical products just a few miles apart will pay different tax rates. It is ugly and complicated, but I like not having the tax as part of the advertised price - it makes it easier to comparison shop, and certainly makes the advertising literature easier to produce.

  135. Re:I posit a dichotomy by The+Bullroarer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Objection! Assumes organs not in evidence!

    --
    Frodo Lives!!
  136. Re:I posit a dichotomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok. i'm pretty stupid, so explain this to me. can you tell me what communism is in a single sentence? can you tell me what scale it applies to? i.e. a group of 10 people, a family, a state, a country, a church, a club, a sports team? can you work that into a frame of reference for me? i thought communism was a form of government chosen by a state?

  137. a Free solution could be somewhat simple... by Micah · · Score: 1

    I've thought about this a good deal but haven't started anything yet.

    Most of my taxes are simple except for a Schedule D for stock/option trades, which can be a pain in the arse by pen and paper. I keep my trades in Gnumeric, and think there should be a program to import Gnumeric (or, better, an OASIS format spreadsheet) and spit out a Schedule D and any D-1s.

    I've been wanting to write a program to do exactly that, but the biggest holdup is the lack of a Free library that can write arbitrary strings to arbitrary locations on PDF pages (the downloadable IRS forms) and generate a PDF containing the D and any needed D1s. Anyone have an easy solution to this? It's not something I want to spend a great deal of time on right now, but if it's there, I'll do it. Perhaps convert the PDFs to PostScript and modify the PostScript, but I don't know PS...

    Anyway, once something like this was accomplished, it should be relatively easy to expand it to other tax forms for other purposes, and eventually fill in the complete 1040. We don't need to do it all in one year ... just get a usable base that helps some people, and add to it every year so that it's more and more complete.

  138. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Duncan3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well you see, over here we have loopholes. Deductions and things.

    It means anyone with any real money, brains, or just a compitent accountant, doesn't have to pay any taxes at all. It's a great system, and it works.

    Your system is all "fair" and we don't take kindly to that over here in the USA.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  139. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people gave perfectly good answers to your tax questions. I just wanted to note how silly it is when people speak on a greater groups behalf (probably to make their point seem stronger). You spoke as if the tax systems across the EU was similar to a point, when I happen to know you're flat out wrong. I lived in the Netherlands for the last 3 years and I filled out a simple electronic form each year and got money back. Just like I did in the US. You had good questions and points, but don't be naive about what you profer as fact.

  140. Taxes? Huh!-Avoiding the question . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm not trolling about the US tax system, but having experienced both US and EU tax practices, I can definitely say that the EU's approach to taxes are far more consumer-friendly. What do you Americans think?"

    What "I" think is that the majority are avoiding the OP's question. Turning it into their own personal rantfest against the IRS. And worse some don't like their personal rants interrupted with information that actually might be useful. That's what I think.

  141. It's starting to change by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    In some transactions, when you can expect the taxes and hidden charges to take your breath away, like a car rental, they have to disclose the tax rate. I'm not 100% sure but I think hotels are either doing it in their advertising or when you make the reservation. Certainly they show you at the desk before you initial the rate. Taxes also vary widely within a particular state. Some cities have local sales taxes they tack on top of state rates.

    It may seem odd to outsiders, but it allows national companies to advertise the same price for an item across advertising mediums and state lines. Otherwise they'd have to make 50 different commercials, and modify them for some cities with different rates. It would be insane trying to keep track of it.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  142. Re:Taxes? Huh! by velo_mike · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Here in Ireland (and in the rest of the EU) your tax is automatically taken out of your paycheck and you don't need to worry about filling in tax returns every year unless you run a business It seems bizarre to me (and the 350 million other Europeans) that all you American folk still have to fill in your own tax returns; surely our way is better?

    Huh? Last time I checked France was a huge part of the EU and while it may seem bizarre to you and your 4 million countryment, I filed just as cryptic tax returns for them over the last 3 years. Guess what, they withhold for Social Security but not Income tax, meaning I wrote a bloody huge check four times every year to pay the tax man.

    As far as "your way being better", I'd much rather have everyone write a check to the government every year, maybe that would finally spur the revolution we need. When you don't see it, except as a digit on a check, the tax seems reasonable. Let people write a check for 20% of their earnings and see how fast fiscal conservatives get elected.

    While I'm at it, every time I'm in the US something I get really pissed off at is that shops are allowed to advertise a basic tax-exclusive price on goods. Here in the EU it's law that shops have to advertise a VAT-inclusive tax so that when you get to the counter you pay the advertised price, not the price plus 10-20% sales tax. How do you guys put up with that?

    How do you put up with paying a 20% tax, in addition to confiscatory rates for social security, income, and property tax? Again, if it were buried in the price, I'm sure we'd gladly pay but since it's obvious, it helps keep government spending down.

    --

    At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
    Alan Greenspan

  143. Free and open e-file by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    The IRS has a target of 80% of all taxpayers using e-file in the near future. Does anyone know where the 'free and open' solution is?

    Right here. It's not done and probably never will be.

  144. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

    The variation in the US is roughly 0-10% (Chicago has an 8.75% sales tax, which is the worst I can think of off the top of my head, but there may be other locations with a bit more.)

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  145. E-filing is collaboration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why the hell should we make the job of the IRS easier? Deluge them with good old fashion paper returns by snail mail. Helping them improve their efficiency only frees up their resoures to harass taxpayers. No thanks.

    Fight the powers that be.

  146. This is an open Opportunity... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    for a company that wishes to compete against the established companies.

    History has shown that the companies that do not make the switch into new technologies rarely survive. Best example was that most business software was on the mainframe/sys 36's for years and years. Then this little company came along in the 80's doing residential and even small business accounting on PCs and Macs. Intuit was considered a joke for doing all that work on systems that was not in vogue. Yet, it was where the future growth was. Likewise, there was no real competition for them. So the place to be is where growth is and little to no competition.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  147. Re:If the IRS is anything like the UK Inland Reven by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    They pay ahem ... "subscription charges" for the documentation and specifications, the tax accounting software companies get to call their software "fully IR/IRS compliant".

    Wrong. You can download all the specs for free, and then if you submit your fingerprints and pass their tests, you yourself can become an official e-services provider. I even signed up as a software provider and got approved for testing, but I never finished the product. You want a free/open source tax program? Write one.

  148. modded down by the bourgeois moderator! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    either that or he's from india and don't like to admit that oursourcing affect american tech sector big time.

  149. Mod Parent UP by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 1

    Free online tax prep.

    Print it and send it your darn self.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  150. Re:Taxes? Huh! by kherrick · · Score: 1

    10-20% sales tax? I am an American in Canada and I can say for sure I have never seen a sales tax that high anywhere in the US. Though in Canada it is like that. There is a GST and PST, provincial and federal sales taxes on almost everything except unprepared food. That makes almost 15%. In Michigan it is only 6%, and used to be 4% only a few years back.

  151. Maryland has it for free by JPMRaptor · · Score: 1
    well for state taxes at least. I've been using it for the last 2 years. It's as easy as TurboTax/TaxCut, plus it saves you $30 for the add-on software and $10 for the additional filing fee that the others charge. Unfortunately it's only good for the Maryland state taxes.

    You can find it at https://ifile.marylandtaxes.com/

  152. Re:Taxes? Huh! by SunFan · · Score: 1

    It's a great system, and it works.

    It's perverse, though. I've been thinking about whether I can call managing my IRA a small business, because the income would be tax free but I get to deduct all my "business expenses" from my other ordinary income... The thought of it makes me giddy, but I have no idea if it's legal, yet.

    --
    -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  153. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

    Chicago has an 8.75% sales tax, which is the worst I can think of off the top of my head, but there may be other locations with a bit more.

    Tennessee has a 7% state sales tax, with counties and localities allowed to tack on up to 2.75% more. In most localities, they tack on the fullest amount allowed for by law, so most places in the state you're looking at 9.75%

    Still, we have no state income tax, so it does balance out a bit.

    --
    What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  154. May be free for you... by MattHaffner · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last year, the on-line TaxACT was one of the few IRS Free filing options that my family qualified for. I did federal there for free (including the filing) and paid some very small fee ~$10? for the state version and filing (with all the info automatically transfered from the federal form). I plan to try it again this year and hope they still have my info on file making it even easier.

  155. Forget "online", forget software... by hacker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hire a CPA. Seriously . They're going to find a LOT more than a little "questionairre" is going to find by asking you questions.

    A highly-skilled CPA (i.e. one who works with technology people) will be able to find places where you can deduct expenditures that your own Intuit and other software can't possibly take into account.

    Use your DSL line for sending business emails? That's deductable as a business expense. Power to keep the cable modem and WAP running? Also deductable.

    Accept PayPal payments for your Free Software work? That's not income, its a Gift, and deductable. There's a lot more where these come from. Most of them aren't going to be asked on any sort of tax software.

    We just finished a website for a local CPA here in Norwich, CT. and he's really skilled in these and other areas.

    Definately check out your local CPA, before you head into H&R Block or online for some question-and-answer forms and software.

    It'll pay for itself in the first year's return. TRUST ME.

    1. Re:Forget "online", forget software... by fisgreen · · Score: 1
      Hire a CPA.

      Good advice for many. However, is it really cost effective for someone who is a non-homeowner, non-self employed, single, and childless? If you've got very straightforward, single-source income and simple investments, web filing makes a lot of sense.

    2. Re:Forget "online", forget software... by ragnar · · Score: 1

      Excellent advice. Of course, if you don't have any consulting income it doesn't make a lot of sense, but a person would be a fool to not consult a CPA if he or she does consulting. The power of pre-tax spending is a fantastic thing. Once I got a clue, I never looked at the world the same again.

      In general, you have to get out of (or supplement) the w-2 income route to get a leg up on taxes. A business person simply considered taxes to be the largest expense and does whatever is ethical and expedient to reduce that expense. A CPA is your friend and pays for itself.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
  156. Re:Taxes? Huh! by JoeF · · Score: 1

    Apparently, you know about as much about the US tax system as about the European one.
    In Germany, France, and most other countries in the EU you have to file yearly tax returns.
    And they actually check every one of them (unlike in the US.)

  157. IRS doesnt supply one? by POds · · Score: 1

    Here in OZ the ATO (Australia Taxation Office) supplies an application to complete your taxation and send it via the net for free. You have to pay for something your only going to use once a year? Is that right?

    Only in America :)

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  158. Build it yourself by socialpariah · · Score: 1

    Check out http://gnutaxes.sf.net. I will be helping out with the project. You should too.

  159. Ah yes, the "screw the poor" tax system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would support your regressive tax that takes a greater percentage of income from the poor and middle-class (before you start spouting BS about how taxes up to the poverty level are covered, please try living at that level for a month or two...) if you will support my "more than fair" tax that takes the form of a 1% yearly tax on weath and assets. You have your money because the citizens and infrastructure of this country made it possible, so we will take our "cut" and we will do it every year to provide an incentive to you to continue earning more money.

    1. Re:Ah yes, the "screw the poor" tax system... by Ed+Bugg · · Score: 1

      I would support your regressive tax that takes a greater percentage of income from the poor and middle-class (before you start spouting BS about how taxes up to the poverty level are covered, please try living at that level for a month or two...)

      Yes and no, it's not that it would take a greater percentage of income from poor and middle-class, because they would get it back in the form of a tax refund, but it does put an undo burden on these people. Since these people are already having problems making ends meet as it is already, forcing them to pay more now would be determintal. Also the thought that it would wipe out the IRS department is a complete falicy, since someone will need to be in charge of making sure the poor and middle-class get that refund. Not to mention, you make enough and won't get a refundm, guess you don't need to spend the time and money needed to do the paperwork needed to get that refund, so again unfair burden on the people that need it the most.

      I was at one point all for a national sales tax to replace the income tax til it hit me what would people who check for change in the sofa just to make sure that the kids have milk this week do in this type of situation (Yes I've been there before). Now I'm leaning towards just a basic flat income tax. It still doesn't ring out a sound of best solution, but it's at least better than what we have now. I think that another addition to that would be the states need to collect the money and pay the federal government, based on the amount of money collected. This would stop the need of having to file twice or, and in some cases, three times (Think of living near the border of two states, living in one while working in another). Think about it for a second, you first compute the federal tax, then usually based on that amount you do your state, wouldn't that be taxed twice (my income has already been taxed by the federal now it's being taxed by the state). Let the state just take the single tax and give the federal what they are owned.

      --
      -- Ed Bugg --You have freedom of choice, but not of consequences.--
    2. Re:Ah yes, the "screw the poor" tax system... by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      The size of the IRS will be drastically reduced under fairtax, instead of having to review 100-200 million personal tax returns a year plus business returns, they have to review receipts of however many retail business exist, a drastically smaller number. Considering the fact that 45 states already have retail sales taxes (and the enforcements arms collecting RST's entail) it is a solveable problem.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
  160. Netherlands by bbc · · Score: 1

    In the Netherlands, business have to file e-tax forms starting this month.

    I tried to get some people to work on FOSS tax reporting software, but no-one was interested. "We'll use Windows," some said. "We'll use the online forms," others said. Ah, well.

    (I did manage to get registered as a developer, though, but haven't done anything with it. So far, the online forms for VAT seem accessible enough.)

  161. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    No one said the EU system was worse.
    No one said the US system was better.
    The simple matter of the fact is that we here in the US are too wrapped up in beurocratic nonsense to be able to figure out anything that simple. If it doesn't require us to fill out 42 forms, all in triplicate, then it must not work!

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  162. The Way Things Actually Are by Grech · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Disclaimer: I work for the IRS, in BMF Adjustments. I am not employed by you as a tax professional. This is not tax advice.

    That out of the way, there have been two big assertions made about the way e-file works, with varying degrees of veracity. I will address them each in turn.

    Assertion 1.The IRS is prohibited by law from offering a free efile package (either web-based or PC based)

    Sort of: This is a decision that is more or less up to Messers Bush and Snow, not Everson. In general, the US goverment doesn't like to compete against private industry based on two predictions about the goverment product:

    • It would suck at first.
    • Everyone would use it anyway, and so it would suck forever.

    Assertion 2.Lobbyists have kept a Free and Open solution from being offered by keeping the specifications secret and only allowing evil corporations to know how to submit returns.

    False: The steps and specs are carefully hidden away in the brightly colored Pub 3112(pdf) and others, such as the equally shiny Pub 1345 (pdf)(The actual specs for the 1040 are in the dead-tree-only Pub 1346)

    Exercise for the reader:

    1. Get some friends together and write a tax preparation package in whatever language and whatever license you want (No extra credit given for ironically titled packages written in Malbolge or Brainf--- and distributed under the new X11 License). Found an LLC under the laws of your state. File Forms 8832 and 2553 with the IRS to be recognized as a Subchapter S Corporation (as a measure to avoid the hassles and shared liabilities of being a partnership).
    2. Figure out the mysterious Step 2 (Hint: Getting recognized as an ERO, and coming up with a business model are likely involved)
    3. Profit!
    ----

    Note: If you have an unwavering faith in the idea that the IRS is evil, then you misunderstand. The IRS is a bureau. As a whole, the Service has absolutely no emotional investment in being either kind or unkind to the taxpayer. Everything the IRS does is prescribed in 26 USC by the Congress. If the law says charge a penalty, we charge it. If the law says grant credit interest on late refunds, we grant it. If the law required that each US Citizen send us a chicken in lieu of a 1040 (it doesn't), then we'd collect 'em. All the same to us.

    --
    It may not be just, but it is fair, and that is more important.
    1. Re:The Way Things Actually Are by legirons · · Score: 1

      In general, the US goverment doesn't like to compete against private industry based on two predictions about the goverment product:
      * It would suck at first.
      * Everyone would use it anyway, and so it would suck forever.
      "

      So the government can write a library (doesn't even matter if it's Open-Source) -- they must have such a thing anyway, to check the forms, and then nobody has to worry about a government-inspired GUI.

      Even a library which just validated forms and returned "correct" or "incorrect" would make it possible for certain types of program to optimise against it (and such a program would still optimise when the next years' validation-library came out)

    2. Re:The Way Things Actually Are by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Its unfair that the author of the program would have to becomme an LLC or a corp, and would have to be recognized as an ERO.

      An *INDIVIDUAL* should be able to utilize any method they find suitable, to be able to produce the electronic data, and then be able to transmit it directly to the IRS.

      I dont want to profit, and I dont want anyone else to profit off me, I just want to be able to transmit my tax return information myself but electronically, rather than in paper form. If I am allowed to prepare and transmit it on paper (using what is essntially a 'common carrier', the USPS), why should I not be able to prepare and transmit it myself in electronic form, using an electronic 'common carrier', why should I be *required* to use a third-party, anymore than I am required to have a third party prepare my paper forms?

      I also dont want the IRS to write or offer any software. In prohibiting the IRS from accepting electronic tax data from individuals directly, the law also prohibits individuals from competing against 'companies', and pretty much prevents anyone from providing that service (even to themsselves) except 'companies'.

    3. Re:The Way Things Actually Are by Grech · · Score: 1
      You are being deliberately obtuse. If you read the referenced publication, individuals are not barred from being EROs. It's just not good business sense to operate a tax business as a sole-proprietor.

      Transmitting a return to the IRS is going to require some kind of software, which has to be written by someone, no matter how fine you split the hairs.

      --
      It may not be just, but it is fair, and that is more important.
    4. Re:The Way Things Actually Are by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Why should an individual have to become an ERO to transmit their *OWN* return? Why does someone have to be a 'business' to transmit their own data electronically rather than on paper?

      And transmitting data does not require *specialized* software. If the IRS created a specification for the format of the data, one could use a text editor to create that format (assuming it was a text format, which there is no reason for it not to be), and an ftp program or a terminal emulator to transmit it. And this is *NO* less accurate or reliable than printing that data onto paper forms (by hand or machine), and then sending the forms by post, and in fact is likely to be more accurate, avoiding both bad handwriting and data entry errors. (And the validity of the data, eg the computations and acceptablity of deductions and whatnot, would be the same as that for paper)

      The only sticky spot would be authentication - but since a scrawled signature on a peice of paper is 'good enough', I'm sure a suitable solution could be found, something involving public key signatures (the mechanism for generating should of course not be tied to any specific software, but rather should be openly specified such that anyone could produce the appropriate signatures, given a valid key). Probably you'd generate a key, print it out in some suitable format, get it signed and notarized, and mail it to the IRS, who would then place it on file to use to verify electronic submissions from you. Various 'end user' companies could produce windows pointy-clicky software for 'the massed', others could use OSS or other software (to be honest, rather than come up with a new key mechanism, I think PGP/GPG would work fine, and saves lots of development time, since those already exist, both in the open and closed worlds)

      Current electronic filing concepts conflate 'preparation', and 'transmission'. I can understand the IRS not producing preparation software. They dont need to produce transmission software, only produce a specification for the format/syntax of data and method of transmission by which they would accept tax data electronically from individuals who wish to transmit only their own tax data, without them wanting or needing to go into the business of preparing or transmitting tax data for anyone else.

  163. UK solutions by pjc50 · · Score: 1

    You can move the deductions around as well. When the UK had morgage interest relief it was called MIRAS and handled through the bank. Student loans aren't tax-deductible but you only have to repay them if you earn over a certain amount.

    And of course we don't have to pay any medical expenses unless we want to go private, in which case it's not tax-deductible.

    1. Re:UK solutions by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      How is the deduction for charitable donations and children handled? (Or non-existant?) Those two I would think could present more problems than the previously mentioned ones.

    2. Re:UK solutions by FireBook · · Score: 1

      usually when you do this its the charity that gets the money from the tax, as in the government gives the charity an extra percentage on top of your donation. This is not done automatically, you have to fill in a form.

      --
      My other OS is also FreeBSD
    3. Re:UK solutions by pjc50 · · Score: 1

      Charitable donations are handled by the charity: you sign a small form saying "I am a UK taxpayer" and hand it in with your donation, and the charity gets an extra 22% from the Inland Revenue. This appears to be economical even for small donations: I've seen it done for museum entry fees of L10 (~= $20).

      Similarly, Working Families Tax Credit (a negative rate of income tax you get if you have children and a low family income) is paid by the employer who reclaims it from the Inland Revenue.

      Bank interest is taxed at the basic rate unless you fill in a form declaring yourself to be a non-taxpayer (e.g. student).

      It's all quite practical and means that non-specialists don't have to waste their time and money faffing around with income tax returns. It's more hassle for the self-employed, but so are most things, and self-employed people usually have accountants anyway.

  164. UK: Use the FOIA, Luke! by pjc50 · · Score: 1

    As of 1 Jan 2005 we should be able to get this out of the IR for free under the Freedom of Information Act.

    See http://www.spy.org.uk/foia/ for more.

  165. IRS should pay ME to e-file! by Cosmo+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    Why the hell should I pay to e-file when it's saving the IRS money? They don't have to pay someone to key in my data so they're saving money. They should pay me the savings or at least make e-filing free.

    1. Re:IRS should pay ME to e-file! by mph · · Score: 1
      Why the hell should I pay to e-file when it's saving the IRS money? They don't have to pay someone to key in my data so they're saving money. They should pay me the savings or at least make e-filing free.
      Yeah, I thought the same thing when the California DMV introduced online payment of vehicle registration fees... they charged a couple of bucks extra to do it online. (You can't even explain it as a premium for last-minute registrants, because the registration deadline is a postmark deadline.)
    2. Re:IRS should pay ME to e-file! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about saving a trip to the DMV? That should be worth something. In VA, I believe there is no extra cost with online renewal and it gives you the option to print out a legally valid temporary registration to use until your real one arrives in the mail.

    3. Re:IRS should pay ME to e-file! by mph · · Score: 1
      How about saving a trip to the DMV? That should be worth something.
      I use a new technology called "mail" to remit my registration fees (my reference to a "postmark" may have provided a hint). Saving this step is, in fact, worth something: $0.37. Since the CA DMV was asking $3 for online payment (as I recall), I wasn't impressed.
    4. Re:IRS should pay ME to e-file! by Dr.+Blue · · Score: 1

      You're not paying the IRS anything, as far as I know. You're paying the TaxACT people, who developed the web app and maintain and support the web site.

    5. Re:IRS should pay ME to e-file! by GhengisKron · · Score: 1

      They'd be happy to pay you. You realize where their money comes from right?

    6. Re:IRS should pay ME to e-file! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credit card companies charge a small percentage in their own fees for each purchase. Normally this charge is hidden in the price a store charges, as required by law. The DMV, instead of charging everyone DMVfee+n% or collecting DMVfee-n%, charged credit card users the extra fee directly.

  166. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It seems bizarre to me (and the 350 million other Europeans) that all you American folk still have to fill in your own tax returns; surely our way is better?

    Your way is simpler and easier, but that doesn't necessarily make it better. For instance, here in the US, we have a deduction (basically a reduction in the amount of income you're taxed on) for interest paid on a loan for your primary residence. This helps encourage people to buy homes instead of rent, which is good for the economy. If the employer deducted everything and computed everything for you, how would you have a deduction that has nothing at all to do with the employer? It seems like the only choices are to either eliminate the deduction or to involve the employer in something that's none of his business. Also, what if you have two jobs?

    While I'm at it, every time I'm in the US something I get really pissed off at is that shops are allowed to advertise a basic tax-exclusive price on goods. Here in the EU it's law that shops have to advertise a VAT-inclusive tax so that when you get to the counter you pay the advertised price, not the price plus 10-20% sales tax. How do you guys put up with that?

    Well, first of all, it's not 10-20%. VAT may be that high in Europe, but in the US it's typically about 8%. For example, in the State of Texas, it can vary in different local areas, but it's capped at 8.25% by law. So that's not nearly as much of a burden as if it were 10-20%. Second of all, it's not an inconvenience because we expect it. Coming from a country that doesn't have it, you're not in the habit of considering that tax will have to be added, and I'm sure when you get to the counter you're confused and surprised that you're being asked to pay more than the sum of the prices you saw. But to us, it's normal, so there is no such surprise.

    Also, it's not that hard to compute the tax. Where I live, it's 8.25%, which is really close to (and, importantly, smaller than) 8.33%, so I know that the tax will never exceed $1 for every $12 I spend. Since most purchases I make aren't more than about $50, I can estimate the tax in my head easily. If dividing by 12 is too complicated, just take one tenth and you over estimate it a bit, but you still get a good guesstimate.

    Finally, some organizations (such as churches) don't pay sales tax. So it's much easier for them if the tax isn't added, because they'd just have to subtract it again.

  167. there's always a linux based solution by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Doesn't KDE come with a calculator?

  168. what a surreal answer by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    The federal system has a half dozen people dealing with it specifically. All these people are doing this full time.

    ONLY 6 people in the entire federal government are working on electronic filing? Are you fucking kidding me? No wonder it's a disaster and has gone absolutely nowhere in almost a decade. Can we hire another dozen or two, and crank out a java-based program by next year please? I mean shit, we spend a billion every few days in Iraq, what's a million to make life easier for half the country with PCs and an internet connection?

    The knowledge is quite specialized

    Would you mind telling me why "how to do" something 240 million people are required to do, is "quite specialized" knowledge?

    What's the incentive for the government to push for something like this?

    Surveys show people on average can end up spending 40 hours or more on preparing their taxes over a course of weeks. That's a pathetic waste of time.

    How about the loss of revenue by mistakes from taxpayers? Cost of sending them "you fucked up your calculations" letters in the mail, etc? I know I wouldn't resent the whole process nearly as much if it was just simpler.

    they'd be taking business away from companies

    Aha- there we are...the truth of the matter comes out...an entire industry is threatened, and not just tax software companies- tax accountants and attorneys too...even though they represent an insignificant number of jobs, we need to complicate an entire nation's tax code and processes to keep them employed?

    Did it occur to you that the federal government could directly employ these experts and programmers to produce a free program? There's no need for TurboTax, Quicken, etc to even exist.

    1. Re:what a surreal answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ONLY 6 people in the entire federal government are working on electronic filing?

      There are 6 people in our company that do absolutely nothing except work on the federal tax product, and that's only in directly analyzing tax law and programming, and that's in maintenance mode (just doing year-to-year changes). When we wrote the 1040 system initially, there were dozens of people working on it for a couple of years. There are well over 100 people doing tax analysis and programming, and hundreds of others in documentation, support, sales, etc, but there are 6 that do not do any states or anything else.

      If the "average" individual is spending 40 hours doing their taxes, then the average is higher than I thought complication wise or lower than I thought, intelligence-wise. Our product is complex because it deals with potentially very complex returns, involving data flow back and forth between businesses, partnerships, and individuals, and automatically optimizes each for the lowest taxes.

      Even though we can use this software for free, my wife just does ours by hand because it's so simple. Probably 3 hours total.

      Did it occur to you that the federal government could directly employ these experts and programmers to produce a free program?

      Did it ever occur to you that the federal government may not be interested in running all companies out of business? They could nationalize everything and make everything as cheap as possible, too.

      Let's nationalize the ENTIRE software industry. It actually makes a LOT of sense for the federal government to produce their own OS, office suite, etc, and give them away for free. THAT would make a LOT of sense. Almost everyone needs word processors and spreadsheets. Tax software, not so much. Most people do NOT need software to do their taxes, they just need to be able to add up a few numbers. But I think most people have gotten to the point where they can't count past 10 without taking off their shoes. I can't think of any other reason to spend 40 hours on their taxes, unless they do ZERO record keeping throughout the year (guess what; software won't organize that shoebox of crap FOR you), or if they have a complex return with partnerships or active shareholdings in corporations, or lots of real estate holdings or something.

  169. Re:Taxes? Huh! by ksheff · · Score: 1

    I was there in 2000 and at the time didn't think the grocery prices were too bad (well, it wasn't Dublin either, so that may explain it). The prices seemed to be about the same as what they were at home after taking the currency conversion rate into account. I wouldn't mind living there if I could.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  170. TurboTax on Win4Lin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No dual-boot. Works great (including e-file for Feds and CA FTB). Requires an extra $90 for Win4Lin plus you need to find a copy of Win98SE. Runs faster than real Win98SE, at least on my 2200 XP.

    Gives RMS a rash, though.

  171. So how will I be doing this year's taxes? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So how will you be doing this year's taxes?

    I won't. Instead, I'll pay x hundred $ for a kick-ass CPA, like I always do, who already forgot more about the tax laws than I'd ever want to know, who can handle my stock options and separate sole proprietorship and charitable contributions and new house interest and the fact that I just got married but didn't change my withholding . . .

    I've come out in the black since I started using to my CPA, and I'll trade money for time any day.

    1. Re:So how will I be doing this year's taxes? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1

      and separate sole proprietorship

      Sole proprietorship? Pay out a few more $$$ to an attorney and set up an LLC instead! Running a sole proprietorship in this day and age is crazy.

      Note: I am not a lawyer. This does not constitute legal advice, and is not the solicitation of legal representation.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    2. Re:So how will I be doing this year's taxes? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      I meant LLC. See, that's why I need a CPA. :-D

  172. Re:Taxes? Huh! by jsight · · Score: 1

    In the US sales tax is disclosed separately from the product cose. Sales tax is generally less than 10%.

    In the US, Sales tax on GAS specifically is always included in the price quoted by the station. The Gas tax is a federal ~18%, plus state tax that is usually at least 12%, for a total of >%30.

    Do you think that's a coincidence?

    Personally, I'd rather keep the fact that people have to be aware of how much taxes they are paying while buying products.

  173. Re:not software, semantic markup THAT'S IT!!!!! by vettemph · · Score: 1
    We should force the government to write the tax code itself in C or BASIC instead of double ...oops, I mean legal speak.

    The book that used to read:
    "If you have medical deductions, fill out form S and enter your result on line 34a"

    would become:
    "Type your medical deduction amount and press [ENTER]."

    Tax code is just an algorithm.

    IF $MONTH = FEBUARY THEN GOTO 1040.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  174. 30%, are you nuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IANAmerican Seriously a 30% tax on new purchases? That's a ridiculous amount.

    1. Re:30%, are you nuts? by derkaas · · Score: 1
      Seriously a 30% tax on new purchases? That's a ridiculous amount.

      No, it isn't. The FairTax would eliminate all federal payroll taxes and personal and corporate income taxes. Further, it is likely that over the first couple of years (market forces take time) after its introduction, prices on most goods would fall by as much as 20% as the embedded taxes paid by corporations and passed on to the consumer would be lifted.

    2. Re:30%, are you nuts? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. The FairTax would eliminate all federal payroll taxes and personal and corporate income taxes. Further, it is likely that over the first couple of years (market forces take time) after its introduction, prices on most goods would fall by as much as 20% as the embedded taxes paid by corporations and passed on to the consumer would be lifted.

      A couple years after the FairTax would be imposed, a new income tax would be levied on the highest income bracket, on grounds that "the rich" are loaded and wouldn't miss the money. Every few years, this tax rate would increase, or a new lower bracket would be created, or both, until the income tax as we presently know it would mysteriously re-emerge. We would then be stuck paying both. That is why we cannot abolish the income tax in favor of something else - because it is an absolute political certainty that we would end up with both.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    3. Re:30%, are you nuts? by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      That's why repealing the 16th ammendment is priority 1 of the Fairtax bill.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    4. Re:30%, are you nuts? by Thng · · Score: 1
      Funny thing is they've kind of already done this.
      The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) was originally designed to fairly tax high income people, basically by disallowing many deductions and exemptions.

      Problem is, the income level where it kicked in was not indexed for inflation. So every year as individual incomes rise, more and more people fall into the group who are eligible to be charged AMT.

      My tax prof said this was terrible, and he was quite worked up about it. It's really a back door way of increasing taxes.

      thng

  175. Excel tax spreadsheet by polyiguana · · Score: 1

    I can't believe no one has mentioned the Tax Calculator. It uses Excel spreadsheets (which work in OpenOffice) for all schedules and most of the major supplemental forms to produce IRS forms with all the math done correctly. Don't download it now, but wait a month or so while the spreadsheet is being refined. It's probably the best tax software that works on all platforms, and it's completely free. As long as you can read IRS instructions, this works great.

  176. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's not difficult to add a few percent mentally

    That's true most of the time, but there's the occasional situation where you're wanting to buy a $4.59 item with a $5 bill in your pocket and an 8.25% sales tax. (Without a calculator, can you tell whether you can afford it?)

  177. Deduct cost of computer for tax preparation? by carlcmc · · Score: 1

    If you can deduct the cost of TurboTax to prepare your taxes, why not deduct the cost of a new computer to run the program to deduct your taxes?

    I just spent 2600 on a new dell with windows xp, quicken 5 and turbo tax. I should deduct all of that right?

  178. I do it by hand, then use TaxActOnline by beachdog · · Score: 1

    My compromise for fastest, cheapest and best tax filing, given the absence of open source software is: First I get the paperwork together. All year long I ensure each deduction is written on a sheet of paper and put in a tax box. That is 90% of the work. Next I fill out the federal and state returns in pencil by hand. Finally type in the numbers from the paper forms to TaxActOnline.com. The really important check point is: Ensure that the online tax bill agrees to the penny with the paper form. Then resume seeking a better and more peaceful truth beyond these morally vacant warmakers.

  179. Re:If the IRS is anything like the UK Inland Reven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you're wrong. He wasn't talking about the US, he wasn't talking about the IRS, he was talking about the UK and the Inland Revenue.

    Get a clue.

  180. Gives RMS a rash, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Gives RMS a rash, though.

    And this would be a bad thing because . . . ?

  181. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fuel is taxed like that and I would guess that the average Joe on the street doesn't have any idea how much he is paying in taxes everytime he fills up his car,

    Here in Texas, the pumps all have a sign that reminds you that the combined federal and state taxes on the gas are 38.4 per gallon. I suppose there are people who never look at the sign, but they're probably the same people who never look at the "tax" line on their receipts when they go to the store, either.

    And it would be a very unpopular move to price gas the way everything else is. A lot of people always buy a fixed dollar amount of gas, and it would be hard to pump $15 worth if you had to look for the display to show "$12.23".

  182. Universal OS tax solution by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    Calculator executable + receipts + time.

    If you have lots of investments and anything beyond a standard 1040, you should seek an accountant.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:Universal OS tax solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I refuse to use an accountant on principle. I get my taxes wrong every year, sometimes one way, sometimes another. It works out; I pay less in fees than I would to an accountant.

      I got some accountanting for dummies books but they are all small business oriented, not individual oriented.

  183. FairTax rebates ALL taxpayers by derkaas · · Score: 2, Informative
    That doesn't seem like a sound policy to me - even though the proponents of such a tax suggest a rebate to those at the poverty line or lower, what happens to those who are only slightly above the poverty line?

    You're right; such a policy wouldn't make any sense, which is probably the reason it is not the policy proposed by the FairTax. Rather, it proposes a rebate to all households equal to the amount of tax on spending up to the poverty line for said households' given situations (i.e. marital status, number of children, geographical location). This rebate could, in one implementation, take place easily via the employer, much like current payroll taxes only in reverse. So, when you get your paycheck, not only is it actually for the full amount of your wages (at least sans state income tax), it includes extra money for you to pay the taxes on your groceries and rent.

    This provision of the FairTax is indeed what makes it "fair," but it's also its most complicated aspect, ensuring that the FairTax will probably never come to bear.

    1. Re:FairTax rebates ALL taxpayers by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually the number one reason that a flat or fair tax will never come to be is that WAY too many people have a vested interest in the mortage deduction. I know tons of people who bought more house than they can reasonably afford because they figured the deduction makes up enough of the difference that it's worth it to them to be a little extended for the things they like about their bigger, more expensive house. Personally I'm fiscally conservative so I have a house with only an 1,100sq ft footprint on an acre of land (don't like neighbors) that cost well, well below both the national and regional averages for a home.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:FairTax rebates ALL taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a valid point, but I don't think that it is a good enough reason to maintain a fundamentally broken tax system. Politicians are weasels, but they want to stay in office. If enough people tell them to change the tax system or they will be voted out of office, I think they will decide to do the right thing. The problem is not enough people will make the effort to write their congressman to force them to change it. People are too busy with American Idol and Survivor to take an active voice in something that improve their lives.

  184. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN (OFF TOPIC) by haledon · · Score: 1

    I know that I am off topic, but your email isn't listed publicly, and I wanted to ask you a few questions about your franchise. Would you be so kind as to email me at jyamisha@h o t m a i l-dot.com?

    --
    i want to live life, not just go through the motions
  185. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Illinois hits me for 3% income on top of the 8.75% sales tax.

    I would gladly pay an extra 1% sales tax, if I could have Tennessee style housing prices.

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  186. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Gas tax is a federal ~18%, plus state tax that is usually at least 12%, for a total of >%30.

    In most states, gas taxes aren't a percentage of the selling price. The federal gas tax is 18.4 cents/gal, and here in Texas the state gas tax is 20 cents/gal.

    This is a terrible system, because it means that gas tax revenue does not keep up with inflation.

  187. Re:Taxes? Huh! by derkaas · · Score: 1
    why in the name of all that's Holy don't you US folks have state-controlled tax returns yet?

    It's called freedom. We're trying to hold on to some modicum of it as long as we can.

  188. Tax innovations: VAT tax, XML, Python modules by beachdog · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Staffers in the Bush administration have "floated" the idea of a Value Added Tax for the United States.

    A VAT tax is the kind of simplification that would allow a radical simplification of the income tax.

    Richard Nixon floated the idea of a VAT tax for the United States.

    VAT is used in Europe. VAT is where each seller collects the VAT tax on her sales and deducts the VAT paid buying stuff for sale. Governments like it because it tends to be "self collecting". It gets revenue from the formerly "underground" economy. It can get revenue from trans national corporations that manipulate "transfer payments" to shift profits offshore.

    As a previous poster has noted, the tax system needs an XML data structure and an XML description of the algorithms for the computation of tax.

    I've daydreamed like this: Divide the task into an algorithm part and a sample data part. A python root module would emulate the "1040" form. All the child forms would be separate Python Modules corresponding to each schedule or tax form. The XML tagged test data would be included with each package of modules. The package of algorithms plus data would be GPG signed.

    This scheme allows free and professional tax applications to co-exist. It enables modular development. It creates credible test data that can be used to cross validate alternate tax packages. It enables trusted open source.

    1. Re:Tax innovations: VAT tax, XML, Python modules by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      The US system already accomplishes most of what you've explained. The specs aren't XML, but they could easily be converted into XML. Just sprinkle in a few < and > (not that I think this will simplify things, but some people are dead set against anything other than XML). Seriously, if XML was the magic bullet, it'd be done by now. I could convert the specs into XML in a matter of days.

      The problem is, if all you implement is the raw spec, you're left with hundreds of forms and thousands of fields. It wouldn't be very useful to anyone not intimately familiar with what information goes where.

      The even have a PDF where they label the PDF with the field numbers used on it. Now that's pretty useful, but you've still gotta worry about all the "fill in the blank" options. As one example of many, "prisoner earned income" isn't listed on the standard 1040 form, because there aren't all that many people who have it. On standard tax forms you write it in (I think it goes under other income, but really I don't remember).

      It's tedious little things like that which make writing the software so difficult. An automatic script could do a lot of the work, but the 1040 alone has 275 fields in it.

      It's out there, and the only open source software I know of that tried to do it is the software I've written, and I gave up. I think eventually there will be free software to do it, and I'm surprised there isn't already, but AFAIK there's not any work currently being done on it.

      See http://www.irs.gov/taxpros/providers/article/0,,id =97982,00.html for the specs.

  189. Different Ideas and Concepts by prdallan · · Score: 1

    In Brazil, the Brazilian Federal Inland Revenue distributes, free of charge, a Windows "tax return" application (version for individuals, though the version for corporations is also available for download, too - it just happens to use other forms and it has a different timetable).

    In 2003 they started a new branch of such application, in Java, which can be used in Windows, Linux, Mac, Solaris, OS2 etc. They even make it available in different download formats. It is quite a good solution.

    Brazilian citizens are required to download it, fill it in and transmit it via web. If one needs to pay more taxes than he/she has paid during a certain year, a certain form is printed and used for a payment through the banking system (on-line or not); If one is entitled to getting back some cash (paid more than he/she should have), the Inland Revenue makes a deposit in your bank account in few months.

    There is no fee for using the software. Actually, this would be a strange concept for Brazilians: the concept is to make it easier for people to use the electronic forms (there is still the paper ones, but less and less people use it), among other reasons, for making the tax collector's lives easier (i.e., processing the information faster, the data comes already 'formatted', easier to detect 'frauds' etc). After all, tax returns are meant for tax collecting purposes...

    People can also use web forms available in the website (haven't tried those though), or the 'telephone declarations' (yep, through call centers, though these ones seem almost always busy close to the deadlines).

    For the curious ones, the link is http://www.receita.fazenda.gov.br/PessoaFisica/IRP F/2004/progIRPF2004multiplataforma.htm . DISCLAIMER: BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE!
    PS: Sorry for the English!

  190. Good Linux Solutions? You've got to be kidding... by John+Sully+(I+hate+a · · Score: 1

    I use TurboTax, and have for many years. Instead of paying the extortion for online filing, I just print out the forms and mail them in. Sure it takes a little longer to get your refund, but you get $30 or so more back.

    --
    Isn't theory a great place? Everything works in theory.
  191. Re:Taxes? Huh! by velo_mike · · Score: 1
    For example, in the US higher education is not free,

    Nowhere in the world is higher education free. While there are countries where students do not get a tuition bill in the mail, they are paying for it in the form of taxation, whether they benefit from it or not...

    --

    At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
    Alan Greenspan

  192. Turbo Tax, AGAIN-Social Taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The hidden benefits of the system are that it encourages savings, removes the complexities of the system that allow for corruption and waste, and collects large amounts of money from the underground markets, where no taxes are currently being collected."

    Well that settles the federal part. Now you only have a couple more levels to deal with. Also (weither you believe in it or not). Revenue isn't the only reason for taxation. It's also a social tool. Say for example the tax rebates you'd get if you weatherized your house. Or put in a backyard nuclear reactor. Or just ate healthier.

    1. Re:Turbo Tax, AGAIN-Social Taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Revenue isn't the only reason for taxation. It's also a social tool."

      That's not what government is for. Let people keep the money that they'd get if they started doing these things; in other words, let the natural incentives be the only incentives. If there is no natural incentive to do something, then why should anyone go and create one? And if people are interested in doing something which doesn't benefit them directly (e.g. switching to fuel cells or something), then let those people do it. We need to allow people to vote with their feet instead of taking their money away and then giving it back only if they conform to what "we" think is the most meritorious position.

  193. Re:not software, semantic markup THAT'S IT!!!!! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    "IF $MONTH = FEBUARY THEN GOTO 1040."

    *scoffs* That's just like the IRS...always writing spaghetti code!

  194. Linux solutions... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > Tax Time Again: Any Linux Solutions

    Of course! Any home computer with Linux on it may immediately be written off as a home business expense.

    ...wait for it...

    It sure isn't being used for games.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Linux solutions... by fedorafreak · · Score: 0

      NIce

      --
      RUN linux its just so much better
  195. Re:Taxes? Huh! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    As a little factoid, in Japan, most of the time tax is included up front on the product's price tag.

  196. Wrong question by slam+smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're asking the wrong question. Better questions are: Why do you have to file tax returns at all? Why is our tax system so complicated? Why does it cost so much to comply tax code and regulations?

    Last year I spent hours crunching through my taxes using turbo tax. I tried really hard to get it all right, but in the end, I'm not honestly 100% sure that I did. Well I think the answer is here at fairtax.org. Basically it all comes down to 3 words "National Sales Tax". Then the linux software problem goes away

    1. Re:Wrong question by NockPoint · · Score: 1
      Wrong answer. A National Sales Tax is not a "fair tax".

      Of course, adding rebates for the lowest income and an income tax for the upper and middle income, it could be part of a "fair tax system". I'm not sure that is any simpler. The problem is that a sales tax is regressive, and regressive taxes are not fair.

      A sales tax is regressive because the lower the income, the more of that income is spend on taxable items. As an example: Lunch at a McD is fully taxable, lunch at a nice place isn't fully taxed (no sales tax on tip), and lunch served by the butler and cooked by a staff of cooks is almost not taxed at all (no sales tax on wages).

      Sales and excise taxes are not "bad", unless these are the only kind of taxes. Taxes on goods with bad side effects (tobacco and alcohol are classic examples) are a way to more fully include all the costs of the good in the price of the good.

    2. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only "fair tax" is no tax. Every system of taxation ultimately reduces to taking money from people against their will--otherwise known as theft. Everything worthwhile that can be paid for with taxes can also be paid for with voluntary payments, as in the business world. Everything repugnant that can be paid for with taxes can only be paid for with taxes, such as wars.

      It is also worth noting that even when something good is paid for with taxes, such as a fire station and their trucks, people will also purchase additional homeowners' insurance. You don't see anyone going out to buy extra 5000-lb. bombs or flesh-shredding land mines, just in case Uncle Sam didn't get enough to protect everyone from the Commies^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Terrorists.

    3. Re:Wrong question by slam+smith · · Score: 1

      Fair is unfortunately a rather hard to determine. It's outright imposible on a macroscopic level. It starts to be more what makes sense and it most efficient. (I kinda talk about this on another issue here.) A national sales tax is VERY efficient and simple. The rebate portion of the proposal gives it a lot of progressivity while robbing it of some of it's simplicity. If it is implemented correctly (And I admit it is a big old IF) it will really do great things for the US economy

  197. The myth of tax deductions... by raehl · · Score: 1

    Lots of people tell you that lots of things are deductable - but you must keep in mind that things that must be itemized to be deducted (like tax preparation software) really are not deductable AT ALL unless the TOTAL amount of all your itemized deductions exceeds your standard deduction. And even then, you're really only getting to "deduct" the amount in excess of the standard deduction.

    For example, my standard deduction is around $4,250. If I don't spend ANY money on tax-deductible items, I can still deduct $4,250.

    If I spend $5,000 instead, how much of that do I get to deduct?

    $750.

    For most people, "tax-deductable" items are NOT really tax deductable, because most people can't afford to spend enough money on tax deductable things to actually exceed their standard deduction.

  198. WRONG! by emc · · Score: 1

    but our payments are now tax deductable.
    WRONG. The /interest/ on your payments is now tax deductable.

    Be very carefull on this one. You'll end up getting audited, and fscked with your pants on.

  199. $0.37 by macdaddy · · Score: 1
    $0.37?! vettemph, are you insane? First of all the average US Federal Tax Return will be at least 4 pages long. Once you include a check you're pushing if not exceeding 2 ounces. $0.37 only covers 1oz. Secondly if you use the pre-addressed envelope the IRS includes in your tax mailing (if you get one) it counted as either a "large envelope" or an "odd shaped" envelope by the USPS. That's $0.49 for the first ounce. A 2oz mailing for First-Class mail will cost you $0.60. You would be a complete idiot to not send it Certified, which costs and additional $2.30. Any CPA will tell you to ask for a Return Receipt as well, which will cost you an additional $1.75. What does all this add up to?

    First-Class Mail $0.60

    Certified $2.30

    Return Receipt $1.75

    Total Cost: $4.65

    That's $4.65 IF your mailing weighs 2oz or less. It's $0.83 for 3oz of First-Class mail, bringing the total to $4.88.

    Let's assume that for whatever reason you want to get your package to the IRS faster than standard First-Class mail provides (maybe you want your return ASAP). Priority mail costs $3.85 up to 16oz. 17oz is jumps to $3.95.

    What does all this mean? It means that only a fool would attempt to send their US Federal Tax Returns with $0.37. The good news is that your mailing expenses for processing your return (including paying a CPA to do it and the costs to mail it in) are tax deductable. What? You didn't keep those receipts? Shame on you.

    1. Re:$0.37 by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Anytime I might be close to the limit I take my envelope to the post office. I've never had my federal forms go over the normal first class limit. Once my state forms did. (the state gets a copy of all federal forms, plus their own forms)

      I trust the post office enough not to bother with certified mail. Most people do the same. Odds are in my favor.

    2. Re:$0.37 by macdaddy · · Score: 1
      My CPA told me the first year I had him do my returns that they insist all their customers send their returns certified at a minimum, return receipt preferred. He said they were always instructed to insist on that. A few friends of mine in college were taught a similar thing while getting business degrees (accounting classes). Think about it like this. You could pay the extra $2.30 and never need it, OR your return could get lost (it could get lost in any of a dozen hops or handling points between you and your nearest IRS office, OR it could get lost or accidentally destroyed during processing). If you can't prove you sent the letter before the deadline and you haven't filed an extension then you are truely SOL. The fines could easily be in the hundreds. Makes $2.30 seem rather trivial, doesn't it? I play the markets all the time. I try not to make a gamble I can't afford to lose when investing my money. I would gladly pay an extra bit of money if it would guarantee me I wouldn't lose hundreds later. That's just me of course.

      I just remembered something my sister's account does to her. He guarantees his work. To do that he doesn't let his clients send in the returns themselves (I recall that my sister asked). He sends it in for them to ensure that it actually gets sent on time. He told her that it was the only way he could offer his guarantee.

  200. Sorted in the UK by FitizenCish · · Score: 1

    http://www.freefile.co.uk

  201. Free e-file direct with the IRS as of Jan. 18 by shaitand · · Score: 1

    You might actually look at the front page of irs.gov before posting about them protecting profit margins.

    1. Re:Free e-file direct with the IRS as of Jan. 18 by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Take your own advice:

      "Members of the tax software industry (i.e., Free File Alliance, LLC) provide these free tax preparation and electronic filing services - not the IRS.Once you choose a particular company, you will be sent directly to the company's commercial web site. Any questions about a particular service or company should be directed to the company providing the free service and not the IRS. Please contact the company to resolve your particular income tax issue. To find out how to contact the company, please refer to the company's web site for more information about their customer service options.

      The government believes that private industry, given its established expertise and experience in the field of electronic tax preparation, has a proven track record in providing the best technology and services available. In addition, the government believes a partnership with private industry will: provide taxpayers with higher quality services by using the existing expertise of the private sector; maximize consumer choice; promote competition within the marketplace; and meet objectives in the least costly manner to taxpayers."

      Oh and you have to qualify, ie, make hardly nothing and only use the 1040ez form. Anything else (like the majority of the population) forget about filing for free electronically.

      I use the turbotax online as a double check to my doing it by hand. Then I just mail it in. If you are actually PAYING taxes in April then you are doing something wrong. The goal is to technically break even but I kinda like getting a rebate.

  202. Bush sets up panel for tax code changes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush sets up panel for tax code changes Ideas for `essential task' due in summer

    Now's your chance to save up the two cents you dropped here, and spend it were it'll do some good.

  203. why even pay us taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    straight fomr the us consititution
    Article 1 section 2

    Clause 3: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers (census)

    the income tax is vountary
    i dont pay it

    1. Re:why even pay us taxes by Squegie · · Score: 0

      In early times, tax collectors were brutes that went around... collecting taxes from people. This hasn't changed too much over time.

      The US (and several other countries) adopted a voluntary tax filing system where people would voluntarily file and pay their taxes, thus eliminating the need to send out tax collectors to the entire population. However, they still will send out tax collectors to the percentage of the population that don't voluntarily file and pay taxes.

      Of course, there is a huge number of people that just don't appear on their list, and the irs can wait 3 years (or more) of non-filing before they start thinking about sending someone out.

      BTW, this kind of scheme has been around for a long time and if you're getting away with not paying for now, good on you. Maybe they'll catch up with you, maybe they won't. I won't even argue about if you're completely right or wrong. However, unless you've got the money to fend off court action from the IRS, I think you're a sitting duck. Sure, some people have won cases in the past, but the IRS hasn't stopped taking people to court over past due taxes, and they've won quite a few cases themselves. I can imagine that the court costs alone are more than enough to offset my tax savings.

      Actually, I haven't "paid" taxes in several years... my business deductions have always put my tax owed in the negative. That will probably change in the next year or so as business is picking up, but I consider that a Good Thing(tm).

      That's my personal opinion on the requirement to pay taxes (I had researched this a few years ago when I came across the idea of not paying taxes), but here's what the IRS has compiled on the matter.

  204. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    If we had a flat tax or got rid of deductions, then the need to file would be almost nonexistent.

    The same would be true if we replaced our horrible income tax scheme with a federal sales tax.

  205. Re:Taxes? Huh! by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1

    It is useful to note that if Ireland were to join the United States, it would become the twenty-seventh largest state (just behind Kentucky, or behind Puerto Rico if it were a state). The parent poster has perhaps not fully considered that a tax record-keeping scheme which could be efficiently operated in one small state might not scale up to a nation one hundred times the size of Ireland.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  206. PDF printable? by msbsod · · Score: 1
    What makes people use PDF? Is there
    • any
    PDF printer on the market? I mean a printer that understands PDF directly, not to be confused with proprietary PC converter software ("reader"), or a more or less working open source replica. Personally I am sick and tired of mixed results, not to mention that the converters blow up the data size easily by a factor of 20 (e.g. PDF to PS). And that keeps a printer busy for several minutes per page. It's not the fault of the printer's format, it's this stupid conversion from PDF. Years ago people were quite happy when PostScript showed up. But apparently did not like the idea that other parties would implement the PostScript language, too. The PC market gave them the perfect opportunity to monopolize the market with constant updates. Problem is that printer manufacturers cannot play this game. Too bad for Adobe. But why does the IRS play favors for Adobe? Is everybody happy with Adobe's update games and endless security problems (see security focus, bugtraq)? Is the IRS just following a stupid idea? Stupid ideas, especially PC ideas, do spread like the plague.
  207. Re:Taxes? Huh! by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

    I don't know where these other "350 million Europeans" are living, but here in Germany it's pretty much the same as the US.

    Money is withheld from your pay, and then once a year you file your taxes to see if you overpaid or underpaid during the year, and throw in any other deductions or credits that you're eligible for.

    --

    One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  208. PDF editor? by pluggo · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't need a PDF editor to fill in the forms electronically. Adobe's reader (I've only tried the Windows version; not sure about the Linux version) will let you type in the fields and save and print the results.

    You can get the forms at http://www.irs.gov/formspubs/lists/0,,id=97817,00. html.

    --
    Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny. Free men pull in all kinds of directions. It's the only way to mak
    1. Re:PDF editor? by msbsod · · Score: 1

      Adobe focuses their efforts on Wintel. If you use different software or hardware, then there is no solution from Adobe. And forget about the open source stuff, it only works 90%, thanks to Adobe's update games. So much about "portable". That is fine for Adobe. But why should that be good enough for the IRS? I doubt that the IRS would seriously argue only 95% people of all tax payers have to file their tax return.

    2. Re:PDF editor? by ApproachingLinux · · Score: 1
      Acrobat Reader 5.1 is all that you need to fill-in the PDF IRS forms (starting this year).

      http://www.irs.gov/formspubs/article/0,,id=98121,0 0.html
      "To view, complete and print IRS fill-in PDF forms you'll need the freely available Adobe Reader software installed on your computer. Beginning October 25, 2004, new fill-in forms will be enabled with "document rights" which will allow you to save what you have filled in on your PC. Version 5.1 or later of Adobe Reader is required."

      Windows users can get Reader 6.0.1 from Adobe for Windows 98SE, ME, NT, 2000, 2000 SP1 (or Reader 7.0 for Win 2000 SP2 or XP). Mac users can get Reader 5.1 for Mac OS 9.1 to 10.2.7 (or Reader 7 for OS 10.2.8 and up). Unfortunately, the Linux Acrobat Reader is stuck at 5.0.10 (as is Solaris, AIX & HP-UX) - there are copies of the next version (7.0 beta) around though ... if you can find someone who got a copy before Adobe discontinued the beta early-release program (sorry, i'm not one of the lucky few, so don't ask) ...

      http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.ht ml
      "Linux Beta: Thank you for your interest in the pre-release program for Adobe Reader 7.0 for Linux. Due to the overwhelming response received from customers, we have closed the pre-release program."

  209. Paper doesn't crash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've used TurboTax in the past, but switched back to pen & paper. The last time we used TurboTax was probably three years ago, but turned into a huge waste of time.

    It blue-screened no less than three times on me, each time when being nearly done entering all relevant info, so I could start from scratch again... On a normally rock-solid computer that I don't recall every blue-screening on me otherwise. Never got it to finish the job, so had to resort to the pen & paper version in the end anyway.

    Anyway, big waste of time & the money for TurboTax, so the next year we didn't even bother with the electronic versions, and just stuck with the paper.

    Now add to that the bad press due to the unasked MBR modifications.

    I don't forsee using the electronic filing again any time soon.

  210. Woah, what? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    You actually have to work out your own taxes?

    1. Re:Woah, what? by muckdog · · Score: 1

      yes what a concept, taxes should be simple enough for a layman to file them on his own.

    2. Re:Woah, what? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't your employer do them, like in every other civilised country in the world?

    3. Re:Woah, what? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, my employer, though they withhold taxes from my paycheck, has no idea how much I pay in deductible mortgage taxes, or whether I have any icome from outside sources, and I for one don't think they have a right to that information.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  211. Tax? by kid+nickng · · Score: 1

    You see, I don't have these worries.. I am still a kid

  212. RAD Roll Your Own -- Gnumeric & Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A while back, I was interested in calculating my taxes under a variety of scenarios (e.g., buying a house with the largest mortgage and investing the freed cash versus using cash to make a larger downpayment).

    I also had been fiddling with Python scripting under Gnumeric. I found it very educational (both from a tax and a Gnumeric/Python perspective) to get out Form 1040, its schedules and their instructions (as well as analogs for my state) and put together a Gnumeric spreadsheet and Python scripts necessary to run to calculations. (I ended up with something useful for my purposes, but not suitable for further publication.)

    The use of Gnumeric, of course, prevents one from getting bogged down in the GUI aspect of it, yet provides a very understandable and dynamic interface (certainly snappier than anything http/html based).

    For people who do not have home businesses or other unusual deductions, tax calculation is not too difficult. I find that gathering the raw data (a step which a tax program or a tax adviser can't really help one with) is the biggest hassle. For most people (even those with a house and some investments), the necessary data is limited to:

    1. Form W-2 from employer.
    2. Form 1099's from banks and brokers regarding investment income.
    3. Mortgage interest statement from mortgage bank (if you have a house and mortgage).
    4. State Real eststs tax assessment (if you have a house).
    5. State tax refund amount from prior year (Form 1099-G) (if you got a refund -- otherwise, the amount of additional state tax paid in the prior year).
    6. Receipts from charitable donations.
    If one has deductible business or medical expenses (and, as others point out, these expenses do not become deductible until they surpass a percentage-of-income test) or is self-employed, things could become much more complicated. Otherwise, one's entire federal tax is generally dependent upon only a dozen or so "arguments".

    A couple problems with IRS forms:

    1. In order to make the forms simple for non-mathematically inclined and to produce intermediate results that have tax law significance, things are often done in a very ass-backwards fashion that would be annoying to a typical Slashdotter (e.g., "use A to calculate X, B to calculate Y, then subtract Y from X to get Z", rather than "use A and B to calculate Z").
    2. Results from Federal tax "worksheets", prior year results or state tax returns are necessary for certain calculations, thus the surface area of the problem is a little greater than one would think. There are also a few somewhat circular dependencies (e.g., the amount of your itemized deduction is cut back based on your adjusted gross income).
    3. Every year the rules change a bit (not too much, but someone would need to check) and the data tables would need to be updated. I do not know how far in advance these are typically finalized and published -- updating could become quite a race.
    4. Because of the interdependency on state and federal tax returns, one needs also to put together a program for your state of choice.
    If I pursued the project further, it probably would not have been too difficult to transition over to PyGtk. One other thing that could be considered is having the program pull up the applicable IRS forms, and perhaps a panel that would contain, for each Item, some explanatory text and an area for the user's notes. One would also want have the program make the electronic filing.

    Bottom line: I would encourage inspired /.'ers to give Gnumeric/Python a try as a RAD enviroment for tax calculation.

  213. Re:Taxes? Huh! by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Again, if it were buried in the price, I'm sure we'd gladly pay but since it's obvious, it helps keep government spending down.

    That's a good point! However, it would still be much more consumer-friendly to advertize BOTH pre-tax and final prices so that it becomes clear even before you buy something.

    In some EU countries a while ago, some gasoline stations protested against horrendous taxe rates (80% is common there) by displaying both the final price (as they always do) AND (that was new) the pre-tax price. The uproar among customers was very noticeable. Unfortunately, they didn't generate enough pressure on their governments to cut back gasoline prices, so it's not always working.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  214. Re:If the IRS is anything like the UK Inland Reven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how come the documentation and XML Schemas are published (for free) on the IR's website? Developer registration and use of the developer test service is free - where are these "subscription charges" you allude to?

  215. Germany... Re:Taxes? Huh! by Tadu · · Score: 1
    Here in Ireland (and in the rest of the EU) your tax is automatically taken out of your paycheck and you don't need to worry about filling in tax returns every year unless you run a business.
    Yeah, if you don't bother about the 2k€ tax refund you might get. In Germany the situation is especially pathetic as there are so many possibilities for deductions that good tax programs will point out to you. Like e.g. the "SteuerSparErklärung 2005" by the "Akademische Arbeitsgemeinschaft". Which is Windows only, but requires only W95 and thus runs happily in WINE with a bit massaging. No surprise, as it seems to be using Qt 3.3.3. I'm just wondering why they don't do a native port to Linux anyway as it should be fairly easy.
  216. Well by Dasch · · Score: 1

    I'll use the free online service provided by my country's department of treasury. All I need to get started is the certificate that was also provided for free.

  217. Re: Fairtax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the bill. HR25 is the bill in the house. It has answers to all of these complaints. It would eliminate the IRS. Businesses spend almost $500 billion just complying with the current tax code. You would no longer have 15% of your paycheck lost in the black hole of social security. For all you anti outsourcing people, the US would become the largest tax haven in the world. Companies would be setting up factories in the US. Job would be created in large numbers in the US. Read the bill and get informed before you say how bad it is. The only people against will be lobbyists who help companies get preferential treatment by manipulating the tax code.

  218. I used GIMP last year by libre+lover · · Score: 1


    I loaded the pdf files into GIMP, specifying a 600dpi resolution, and "filled in the blanks" as if I was editing an image file. You'll need at least 256MB of RAM to do this - a 600dpi image file is huge - and you'll still use some swap, but it works. When you load the pdf into GIMP make sure you only load/edit/save one page at a time or you'll run out of RAM!

    Although you can save the edited file as a pdf there really isn't much point to it because once GIMP converts the pdf to a bitmap format for editing that's the only way it can save it. Anyhow, once you're done editing, save the file in a format that your printer can handle (I use png with compression 9), then lpr it to your printer.

    The only drawback to this technique is that you'll have one edited image file for each page of your 1040 and the total disk space required for all of the image files will be huge compared to that of the original pdf. For example, last year's entire 1040 pdf was 176K, whereas one page of that pdf, edited and saved as a png file, was 632K.

    --
    Error: .sig undefined
  219. A reason NOT to e-file: IRS' dirty little secret by duh_lime · · Score: 1

    I used to have an employee who had previously worked on the IRS' e-file program. He said the IRS collects and saves A LOT more information in the e-file process than they do in the paper process. And of course it saves the IRS a lot of scanning/processing expense. My feeling is that if the IRS wants me to do something to save them money and help them collect/save more information on me, I'll only do it for a discount on my taxes. That won't happen, so I'll forever send in paper. (I can wait a few extra weeks for a refund.)

  220. Re:dual boot (Flamebait) by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    Spoken like a true AC trolling Slashdot 20 minutes after finishing playing Counterstrike:Source while jerking off to pictures of his little sister...

  221. Re:TaxAct Online is free, $10 e-file, $16 with sta by i621148 · · Score: 1

    i went and tried out this site on os x and it told me that safari wouldn't fit the bill

  222. Do it with VITA by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    The Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program the IRS runs is pretty nice. Most of the time you do simple 1040's with a standard deduction, but the best part is by helping out here you also learn by do other peoples taxes and their unique situations. Depending on where you are you can get an IRS employee who trains a group pf people on the Pub 17 and some other issues like Earned Income Credit, Child Tax credit, and my favorite-the life time learning credit. Besides all this if you get in a group, you are provide access to computer with their software-and that is the jewel, all the calculations are done for you and any form needed pops up. Any how this whole experience has encouraged me to learn about taxes and learn how to pay them. I mean essentially you learn how the law applies to you and what you can do within the laws.

    This is my "hobby" to help people with their taxes and also help them get more money back too. If most people would only read the pub 17 once and then keep up with the updates every year you would learn so much, and you could also help so much! If possible help as many people as you can, it's one type of community service that helps you and the people too.

    Once you read into taxes you will understand why the rich get richer and how many of the tax laws are written to help...the congressmen and women in Washington D.C.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  223. Re:Five simple words:Taxact is better than Turbo by dbreeze · · Score: 1

    Do all you need for under $20.

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  224. Pay a guy by krygny · · Score: 1

    While I still do many home improvement projects, When a major repair is needed, I call in a guy who knows what he's doing and pay him. And my DIY days are over forever for two things in particular: cars and tax prep. No more crawling under the car to change the oil when I can just pay $22 to have it done in about 30 minutes. And no more killing a Saturday preparing taxes when I can just pay my accountant about $125. I'm in and out of his office in about 20 minutes, the cost is deductable, he e-files for me, and I always get a refund. It's almost a pleasure. There's also the added bonus of being able to call him year-round with tax implication questions, usually for no charge.

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  225. Re:Taxes? Huh! by raynet · · Score: 1

    In Finland this works and we even have progressive income tax. Every year the government mails us tax cards that shows how much the employer should take out from the paycheck so that we don't have to pay any extra taxes. You then give this paper to your employer (if you havent done that then he will have to take 40+% tax from the paycheck). If you get a raise, extra deductions etc, you can always call the tax office and they'll calculate you a new card. Very simple and efficient.

    --
    - Raynet --> .
  226. Re:I posit a dichotomy by geekboy642 · · Score: 0

    ...which keep my sister-in-law from dying of her medical conditions. I can't afford them, and neither can her mother. Government money, medicare and welfare, is the only way she gets the care that she needs.
    Yeah, there used to be no income tax, but there also used to be slavery, too.

    --
    Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  227. Call me old fashioned by defile · · Score: 1

    ...but filing taxes on my own was a novelty that I've already experienced. Now I pay an accountant to do it. And if you really want me to blow your mind, other than contacting him via email to request an appointment, no general purpose computers are used in the process (by me).

    Yes, I also pay bills with hand-written checks and mail them back by USPS mail.

  228. Re:Taxes? Huh! by theCoder · · Score: 1

    As an American, I actually think it's better that people are forced to see the sales tax as something that's added onto the cost of goods. If the tax was made a part of the base price of the item, then the government would be free to raise it with little reprocussion because most people wouldn't realize that the price went up because of a change in taxes. But in the U.S., everyone sees the cost of sales tax on their purchases. Maybe that's why the VAT is 10-20% and most (if not all) sales tax rates in the U.S. are less than 10% (mine is 6%).

    The same could be said of income tax withholding (where your employer takes part of your paycheck and sends it to the government every pay period). If every April, everyone in the U.S. had to write multi-thousand (or more likely, multi-ten-thousand) dollar check, taxes would be much lower. It would be even better if that bill was somehow able to be due right in the middle of tax season. But that will never happen, since the Federal government is much too addicted to our money to ever change.

    So, from my point of view, the least amount of taxes (without sacrificing essential government services) is the most fair and consumer-friendly. And hiding taxes from people only leads to higher taxes (and government bloat), so I much prefer the American system.

    --
    "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
  229. Re:I posit a dichotomy by geekboy642 · · Score: 0

    One for all, and all for one!

    Communism is basically, everyone works for the common good, and none are considered arbitrarily better than any other. Unfortunately, every government(so far) which espouses communism betrays these two principles almost as soon as it forms.
    For a true communist society to work, you can't have any crooks. Everyone must be mindlessly moral, to the point where(for instance) they could have a common bank account, and nobody would even think of taking out $60k to get a nicer car for themselves. Theoretically, your communist society can be of any size. However, the larger it grows, the more crooks will sneak in, who will exploit the honest people and function as leeches, disrupting the system.

    --
    Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  230. You would think that the Linux folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think that the Linux people, who believe it's Evil to pay for anything, wouldn't bother to pay their taxes!

    on an unrelated note:

    If you don't pay AMT, you are a "lucky ducky" and have NO RIGHT to COMPLAIN about taxes.

    1. Re:You would think that the Linux folks... by msbsod · · Score: 1

      The Linux people do not have to pay their taxes, because they do not earn a buck with Linux.

  231. The reason for tax returns in the USA by lildogie · · Score: 1

    > all you American folk still have to fill in your own tax returns; surely our way is better?

    The IRS tax return is the mechanism we use to allow rich people to escape paying income tax.

  232. How Free File came to be (re: "protectionism") by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1
    The IRS wanted electronic filing in their own interest -- it's easier for them to deal with and according to a tax preparer I know, all returns have been electronic at IRS for years. Your paper return doesn't survive past the electronic entry system there.

    Initially the IRS wanted to just develop its own tax-prep software in-house. The tax-prep industry (H&R Block, Intuit, Jackson Hewitt, etc.) got wind of this and screamed bloody murder about it -- what would free filing available directly through the IRS do their business?

    A deal was eventually struck whereby the tax-prep companies agreed to offer free filing to lower-income filers (and I believe the income ceiling rises each year until the 80% target's met). In return, the IRS agreed not to develop competing tax-prep software and to allow the tax-prep folks to bombard you with ads for additional services which you would pay for.

    Essentially what the story submitter complains about as the IRS "protecting its partners" was the IRS' bid to get us free electronic filing at all in the face of what would have been concerted legal and political resistance from a very wealthy industry.

    Personally I'd rather see the IRS say "blow it out your asses, tax industry. We require Americans to do this, it's only fair that we allow them to do it electronically for free since that saves us time, money and manpower anyway." But for now this is a good first step.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
    1. Re:How Free File came to be (re: "protectionism") by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Good to know. I figured something like this was the case after I saw this: "NOTE: IRS cannot compete with private enterprise and does not offer free e-file software or direct" from this page: filing.http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=9829 4,00.html It's too bad that we can't fulfill our civic duty without paying for efile (it should be free, just like voting!!!), or sending the forms in by mail. The postal method is cheaper, so I'll go that route. It might cost the IRS $.50 or a dollar to enter the form in, but that's a whole lot cheaper than paying to file both state and federal, which would total $15 at the cheapest website. No thanks, I'll do them myself.

  233. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would gladly pay an extra 1% sales tax, if I could have Tennessee style housing prices.

    The reason Tennessee has Tennessee-style housing prices is because, well, it's Tennessee. You can't have those prices without all the other crap -- black church burning, and governors having to veto attempts by the state legislature to make teaching science illegal, and so on -- as well. Are you still interested in the deal?

  234. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

    Like I said - I would trade the sales tax for not having to pay $300,000 for a 2 bedroom condo. If anything else has to be lumped in, deal is off - except, well, if you wanted to trade your governor for ours (soulless machine bastard that he is) I might consider it. And I don't even know anything *about* your governor, except that he isn't Blagojevich.

    (In other words, I recognize that the reason I have to pay that much money for real estate is because I live somewhere worth living, but you can't blame me for occasionally wishing I could afford to buy a house.)

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  235. Of course USA has automatic withholding. by mbkennel · · Score: 1

    Yes, if you work in the US for a company or government and get paid a salary, your taxes---approximated---are taken out of your paycheck and paid to the Federal and State tax authorities.

    If your situation is as simple as you describe in the EU (no business, no substantial other income, no substantial deductions), the US tax forms are extremely simple.

    Of course, many people gain significant income via their own businesses, for example consulting or other activities. And there you have to be honest and say what you made and calculate what you owe. In fact you are obligated to pay "estimated" taxes every quarter based on that quarter's income.

    In either case (working for company or yourself), if at the end of the year, your detailed tax return shows you owe substantially more than what you already paid---either by estimated tax payments or by automatic withholding---you will pay an additional penalty.

    At the end of the year when you submit your tax form, you will reconcile all the possible deductions and extra taxes you might owe.

    For example, if you make money during the year on your stock market investments and sell during that year, you will incur tax on that. Your brokerage does not usually submit witheld money from this for US residents, but it does tell the tax authorities how much you sold, when, and what the proceeds were.

    When you fill out your tax forms you have to reconcile this too.

    Tax-inclusive prices in the EU are more consumer-friendly on the calculation. The argument used against this here is that (1) taxes vary by locality (2) by building the tax rate into the price it makes tax increases easier politically.

  236. More Deductions = More Complex = Less Tax by Enthrash · · Score: 1

    Considering you are perhaps the least taxed industrialized nation in the world, I would count my blessings, suck it up and buy turbo tax, and then go buy my honking SUV with my nice big refund :D.

    The Europeans simply won't be able to gather how things can get so complicated because they most likely don't have nearly as many deductions as those in the USA (mortgage/car interest, depreciation for various assets etc).

    In any event....I only wish here in Canada we had the tax system you guys in the USA have. I'll take the extra $$$ along with some extra complexity any day :).

    Rich...

  237. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans hate a hidden tax, thus the reason for tax preparation and advertising the price not including tax. It is purely psychological

  238. Brazillian system by Tellarin · · Score: 1

    In Brazil the goverment also provides a way for people to fill their tax forms eletronically and most people (more than 70%) do it this way.
    There is a MS-Windows only app and a Java-based applications that runs nicely on Linux.

  239. Re:Taxes? Huh! by JoeNotCharles · · Score: 1

    I don't understand how this could work. Your tax bracket depends on the *total* amount you make. If you have two jobs, how can each job take the appropriate amount out of your paycheck? What about deductions and loopholes and all that crazy stuff? It seems to me like you'd have to do just as much paperwork, but spread out in little chunks throughout the year instead of once at tax time. (Who wants to have to file a "my mother is sick; she is now a dependant" form and then a year later file to say "my mother just died; she's no longer a dependant", while still having to deal with the emotionals? Much better to just either put her on you yearly tax form or leave her off.) The way it works here in Canada is that they do some half-assed calculations when you start a job to decide how much to take off (by giving them employee a form to fill in where you estimate how much you'll make from other sources and things). I've never in my life bothered to fill the form in correctly, so they always take off the base amount and then at tax time I discover whether I owe a chunk or get a chunk refunded. (It's usually been a refund since I was in school and had massive tuition to claim until recently. If I were smart I'd arrange it so I always owe at tax time so at least I can earn interest on the money in the meantime, but I'm lazy.)

  240. Re:Taxes? Huh! by JoeNotCharles · · Score: 1

    Canada in the 80's introduced the GST, the most hated tax ever. It was a large factor in completely destroying the Conservative party - which is a shame because, although it's a pretty bad tax, it's better than the horrible hidden tax that it replaced. The weird thing is, the government mandated by law that you couldn't hide the tax in the price - meaning any time a consumer bought anything, they'd see the hated words GST at the bottom of their sales slip and remember how badly the government "screwed them over". I can't figure out why they'd do that, considering how much it cost them.

  241. A great online tax service by Al+Truisme · · Score: 1

    You should try this online tax service: it's free, it's in Java, it's secure. Oh yeah, BTW, it's French! The service isn't open just at the moment, but I wrote about it least year: http://bubbalogic.blogspot.com/2004/03/irs-before- getting-started.html

  242. OpenTaxSolver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An OS Independent Tax Program that works well with Offical IRS PDF files
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentaxsolv er/

  243. Free File Home - Your Link to Free Online Filing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you may want to mod this up as it goes directly to the users orig question.

    The IRS does have a free e-file option. Link here http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=118986,00.h tml

  244. Has anyone even TRIED Wine + tax package? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I asked the "Linux tax prep software" question on Slashdot back in '99, and the answers haven't changed much: http://slashdot.org/askslashdot/99/12/16/1921248.s html

    Then as now, the only "real" software tax prep game in town is of the TaxCut / TurboTax variety, under Windows. I don't want my data to go anywhere but my PC and the IRS, so web solutions aren't for me.

    I intend to (once again) see if my favorite package (TaxCut) will work under Wine+Linux. I don't have much hope: While Wine continues to improve, the tax packages seem to bloat to use ever more APIs, making success unlikely.

    Has anyone tried this already?

    - Bob Cunningham

  245. Citizenship and instruments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compare the vast possibilities:

    Citizen of District of Columbia (stomped and disbanded)
    federal (Congress) Citizen
    citizen of the United States (14th Amendment)
    Citizen of the United States of America (Admiralty)

    state Citizen (by right)
    Citizen of a state (on duty)

    American inhabitant (nobility)
    American Citizen (original, communis lex)

    According to organization, states were all for-profit corporations of Britain. The people are nobility and the states can't create people under obvious reasons. "America" is hebrew word meaning "people" and you don't see anything called "America of the United States", but you see the perdition beknownst "The People of the United States" or "The People of the State of California" California is of America, "Congress" created "State of California" and joined it to the United States while the people (America) joined California to the United States of America.

    Then there are instruments...CALIFORNIA instrumentalized by California. UNITED STATES instrumentalized by the bastard childs in District of Columbia.

  246. Taxing Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  247. How soon they forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    500 Comments on here, and I can't believe not a single person has mentioned Turbo Tax and product activation. I dropped Turbo Tax when they pulled that bogus stunt, and never looked back.

    Now I use Tax Cut for federal, and do my state by hand. Wishing there was a Linux solution, too, though. The only things which cause me to keep a windows partition around at all are games, and tax software - that's it. Everything else I need, Linux has been supplying for years.

  248. Malaysia by SpikyTux · · Score: 1

    In Malaysia, the government has setup a webtool to help the tax payers to calcute income tax payable.

  249. just recompile by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    All Sun really needs to do is dust off their old SPARC 5 and recompile the Linux version for Solaris. I doubt it has many Linux-specific calls.

  250. Ughh... can we eliminate this problem yet? by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    http://www.fairtax.org

  251. IRS in Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Brazil, where we've being doing e-forms since 1999; the sofware provided by the IRS itself.

    The official software ('programa') is found at the IRS' download page:

    http://www.receita.fazenda.gov.br/Download/Progr am asPF.htm

    under
    "DIRPF - Declaração do Imposto de Renda de Pessoa Física".

    Note last year we had a Java (multi-platafform) version.

    The software calculates your taxes and, when complete, it uses its own applet to encrypt and upload the form to the IRS server, once you're connected. Sending back the printable receipt (with day and upload hour).

    Quite convenient. :)

  252. Re:Taxes? Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20% we pay 22, or 23 not sure which in the UK. How do we put up with it? Because you aren't all selfish fucking arseholes like you lot in the US.

  253. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is pretty impressive. Better than I would have expected. Check it out!!!

  254. Ugh, virtual machines, anyone? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    Be that as it may, there are still solutions like VMware that eliminate this problem. And VMware is not all that expensive these days.

  255. beware middlemen by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    In other words, some (but not all) taxpayers can file electronicly for free provided they send their personal financial data to some third party they have no reason to trust that has no rational reason to be involved in the first place. (I wonder, what do these free file companies do with all that data?)

    Sorry, I'd rather maintain my privacy and use the dead tree snail mail version.

  256. Re:Turbo Tax & other filings by hel+shwarts · · Score: 1

    I am one of the P's of an LLC, which does some filing (other then taxes) for people. I'd say experience is the main factor here. If you are able spend some time learning about specific filing , you might have a good chance of getting it done by yourself & saving some money. The solution is very often much easier then it looks like. But be ready to make quite a few phone calls & to read a bunch of articles on the subject. How ever the professional filers often know the "shortcuts" & using this knowledge they often can save you considerable amounts of your money or/end time. This is how the economy works, we turn our specific knowledge into our profit. Same as pizza guy charges me for a good pizza. I personally believe that it feels better to pay somebody for a good service & then to be realizing what the tax-paid-wellfare is used for, then looking at it's consumers doing drugs & generating a kid each year, hahhaha while you "cann't afford another kid".

  257. A whim by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    One example.. 18th. If that wasn't on a whim, due to a small group of fanatics then I don't know what is.

    And it serves my example perfectly of the power that idiots have to change the fabric of this country on a whim. Another easy example will be when the 'anti gay marriage' amendment comes back into debate..

    Tearing it down? . tearing down a creation they felt was 'right' and would stand the test of time? No, they would have never conceived of anyone tearing down their creation.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:A whim by justins · · Score: 1
      One example.. 18th. If that wasn't on a whim, due to a small group of fanatics then I don't know what is.

      They were neither a small group (it takes overwhelming popular support to get an amendment passed) or acting on a whim (their movement had been around a really long time). The "fanatics" part is awfully subjective.

      Tearing it down? . tearing down a creation they felt was 'right' and would stand the test of time? No, they would have never conceived of anyone tearing down their creation.

      First, it would be awfully easy for them to conceive of someone destroying the government they just created. They were revolutionaries. Pull your head out of your ass and understand the implications of that.

      Second, they made the constitution flexible through the amendment process because they knew the design of the government had to bend, rather than break. Come on kid, this is basic stuff. They wrote about it all the time. The first thing they did was tweak the design, in the form of the bill of rights.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  258. stick with pencil and paper by juan2074 · · Score: 1
    Who cares what the IRS wants?

    If everyone in the country filled in the forms with a pencil, what could they do about it?

    And what is your reason for not wanting to use a pencil to fill out the form?

  259. False economies by one-egg · · Score: 1
    Don't make the mistake of thinking you're saving money by paying $29 for Turbotax--or worse, paying $0.37 for a stamp.

    I pay about $1K to my tax guy every year (my wife and I have fairly complex taxes). It's money well spent. Turbotax can save me from reading 500 pages of IRS publications every year (as I used to do), but it can't tell me that my perfectly legal deduction in category A would draw unwanted attention but that it could also fit into category B, which never would have occurred to me. On average, I'd say that my tax guy has paid for himself by finding 20% more in stuff I would have missed than what he charges me.

    BTW, I do use Linux. In true Unix fashion, my financial records are flat ASCII files. A few awk scripts and Makefiles put them together into summaries categorized by type of expense. I print the summaries using enscript and hand the result to the tax guy, who has gotten used to my oddness. He highlights income in one color, deductions in another, takes the sheet, and sends me a return to sign a week later. It's as smooth as can be.

  260. Duh. by lorcha · · Score: 1

    And he didn't have to do his fucking taxes. Maybe your time is worthless, but mine is not.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  261. Dude! by lorcha · · Score: 1
    Don't rule out credit cards! They are awesome! Granted I have really high limits and spotless credit, but I bought a house on a credit card once.

    Try this. Call your best credit card issuer and ask for their best rate on access to your available cash. Ask them again if that is their best rate. Keep asking until they go no lower. I got a $30k loan at 3.9%+$50 in "closing costs" for 10 minutes of haggling. Good luck getting that kind of a deal on a mortgage, and this loan isn't even secured against the property!

    And before you bitch that my interest isn't tax-deductible, it was an investment property, so you're damned right the interest is tax-deductible as an ordinary and customary business expense.

    Still think I need my head examined? I love credit cards!

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  262. Brazilian example... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We pay tons of taxes down here in Brasil too, but at least our government gives the software for free, it is Win32 based (heard there is a Java version). Actually the software is available for quite a long time (remember even the DOS versions of it). We are giving our money away, why shouldn't we at least have an easy way to do it??

    Besides this there is an special online version of it aimed at low income people that only need to do that to keep their IRS id number active (so they can make loans, etc.). During the tax season these folks go to open offices and spent less than 10 minutes...usually there are attendants that help for doing task.

  263. www.goodwill.org by agent · · Score: 1

    www.goodwill.org
    Give them a call, I think some people there will do them for free.
    Insider time from my father.
    Peace.