Slashdot Mirror


Secure Hard Drive Deletion Appliance?

An anonymous reader asks "I am searching for a box into which I can plug a hard drive (IDE or SCSI of various flavors) and automatically begin a secure deletion process (DoD 2250 compliant or the like would be good). This is normally for dead drives which need to be RMA-ed. Because of various regulations (HIPAA for starters), we need to at least attempt to do a good job clearing the disk. I've heard from a number of places, including this Slashdot story, that degaussing isn't great. There are software solutions out there, but in general, I want to toss a replacement hard drive in and not have to hunt around for hardware to put the bad drive in in order to run the software. Given the right case, a solid state drive, some SCSI cards and one of various pieces of software, I can imagine such a beast. Has anyone seen someone selling something like this?" No case-opening is necessary to use a USB/IDE converter, which might be a good middle ground. Any other ideas?

573 comments

  1. Still Risky by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have something so important, it might be best to destroy/keep the dead drives and pay for new ones, which aren't that expensive compared to the risk of someone finding out a way to recover your data even after it's been processed by the state-of-the-art secure deletion processor.

    I believe the information is secured only if it's still in your hand.

    1. Re:Still Risky by Cutriss · · Score: 0

      I believe the information is secured only if it's still in your hand.

      What if it's in your hand, and my hand too? Is it still secure then?

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:Still Risky by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      No, because you might have an atomic level reading device that can store every peice of information that those atoms store, and decode it later at your own convenience, without the HD in your hand.

    3. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good point. Personally, I have an atomic level reading device implanted in my thumb for just such scenarios, but I have to admit that it taxes even my home beowulf cluster to do the decodes later. If you have the drive in one hand, it seems you could use your free hand to simply kill the other guy and steal the drive, which takes us back to the submitter's original problem, non?

    4. Re:Still Risky by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Informative

      It may be easier to pay extra for a warranty that lets you keep the failed hard drive. Dell has one. Others probably do too. Or considering how cheap hard drives are, just buy a few spare drives for the whole office and don't RMA the failed drives. The risk there is if you get a batch of bum drives. It happened at my office. Every single Maxtor drive from one order of Dells failed in less than a year. It was just bad sectors so we could still wipe them.

    5. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for DoD and we have an agreement with Dell that if a hard drive goes bad, they will replace it and we keep the original.

    6. Re:Still Risky by forkazoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uhhh... I disagree. I work at an organisation which falls under HIPAA. All the money we would spend on new hard drives for no apparent reason would mean that developmentally delayed persons in the community would be unable to get access to the resources we exist to provide.

      Whenever somebody moves from one department to another, they need either a new PC, new HD, or a fresh setup on their old PC after a secure wipe. Every time somebody leaves the organisation, or a new person arrives. Every time a drive dies and the PC needs to get a new one under warranty.

      Right now, I am probably doing a minimum of ten secure wipes every month. A new hard drive would cost roughly a hundred bucks. That's 12,000 dollars annually, minimum, just on hard drives, which would be wasted. That's a certain number of hours we would need to cut back the day program, leaving mentally retarded people roaming the streets without any help. Including the mentally retarded people who aren't allowed near children because they have sexually assaulted them in the past. That's a certain number of winter coats that can't be bought for people who can't work a steady job.

      So, we use a utility called DBAN, Darik's Boot And Nuke. It's part of a free x86 rescue CD I downloaded. It comes with a bootable linux live CD, which includes an ntfs resizer, and memtest86. I usually just run it in teh machine where the HD is, rather than pulling the HDD out. In particular, this is much handier for laptops than a special device would be. OTOH, it would be easy enough to get an external hot swap caddy, and use it as your appliance, just plug it into any machine.

      Also, you can always just dd /dev/random onto your disk a few times. Anybody know any good reason why that would be insuffiecient?

    7. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Having bought a Dell computer at Wal-Mart, I know everything about DoD hard drive disposal, and I advise you to keep the original.

    8. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was just bad sectors so we could still wipe them.

      Actually, if it was a bad sector problem, then by the time the drive "failed", the drive firmware already remapped a significant number of sectors into places where you can't write, and therefore didn't overwrite.

    9. Re:Still Risky by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Whenever somebody moves from one department to another, they need either a new PC, new HD, or a fresh setup on their old PC after a secure wipe. Every time somebody leaves the organisation, or a new person arrives.

      Are you just making more work for yourself than is required? If you have someone moving from one department to another, would the PC necessarily follow? If not, would the new person taking that person's place not need substantially the same setup as the old person?

      I work at a bank and we are not (necessarily) covered by HIPAA. We are, however, covered by GLB. We don't throw away any magnetic media, but I don't replace hard drives when moving workstations around either.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    10. Re:Still Risky by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      you may be better off with srm, I'm not sure. It does a single pass, 7 pass (US DoD compliant) or a 35 pass delete. These last two are a mix of random and ordered writes. The basic idea then would be to fillup the HD and then secure delete it only once. But only your lawyer can tell you what is 'enough' according to the law.

    11. Re:Still Risky by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      You could also follow The DOD protocol. Just a thought. I always thought they baked the platters, but i guess other methods are preffered.

    12. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was for bad drives, though.

    13. Re:Still Risky by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      It's the data hombre, always the data. He can go through My Docs and C:\ to a fare thee well, but end users can find all sorts of places to save confidential documents on their drive, and I wouldn't wanna spend all day looking through every document file on there to see if it is safe to leave on there or not. Sometimes I think people swear a HIPAA oath at gunpoint. Medical offices seem to get panicky when that topic comes up, like they wouldn't dare step out of line. Fine by me, but a curious reaction I have noticed in the last couple of years.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    14. Re:Still Risky by fireloins · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I always figured that the safest way to wipe a hard drive would be to heat it up above the Curie temperature. Once all of those domains are randomized, there ain't no information left. Anyone have any idea what T_C is for a hard drive platter? I would guess its in the 700K range, which unfortunately is too hot for your standard oven. But if you have a friend who works at a brick oven pizza parlor, that would probably do the trick.

    15. Re:Still Risky by Marty200 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whenever somebody moves from one department to another, they need either a new PC, new HD, or a fresh setup on their old PC after a secure wipe. Every time somebody leaves the organisation, or a new person arrives. Every time a drive dies and the PC needs to get a new one under warranty.

      Right now, I am probably doing a minimum of ten secure wipes every month. A new hard drive would cost roughly a hundred bucks. That's 12,000 dollars annually, minimum, just on hard drives, which would be wasted.


      You are missing the point. You can wipe a fully function drive that is staying inside your organisation and be fairly sure no one will get to the deleted info. But if the drive is broken, you can't besure the drive has been fully erased. And then you are sending it off to someone outside your organisation who may decided to see what you left on it.

      Also, you can always just dd /dev/random onto your disk a few times. Anybody know any good reason why that would be insuffiecient?

      Because the drive is broken. Chances are you can't write to it.

      Best bet is to keep the drives and destroy them yourselves. If you buy enough stuff you can probably get something worked out with your vendor so you get a deal on warranty replacements.

      MG

      --

      Randomly distributing Karma whenever possible.

    16. Re:Still Risky by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      I got that, but if Bob the Accounts Receivable guy goes to some other department, and you hire Jim the New Accounts Receivable guy - wouldn't they be entitled to the same information?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    17. Re:Still Risky by boodaman · · Score: 1

      Huh??? Why not just move the PC with the person? Then it wouldn't make any difference at all where the user stored their files, they'd have the same PC and the same drive.

      Where I work, that's how it is done. We don't wipe anything...the PC you have when you start is your PC until it gets renewed (every 3 years).

    18. Re:Still Risky by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Read the DBAN FAQ page:
      Q: Is the Gutmann method the best method?

      A: No.

      Most of the passes in the Gutmann wipe are designed to flip the bits in MFM/RLL encoded disks, which is an encoding that modern hard disks do not use.

      In a followup to his paper, Gutmann said that it is unnecessary to run those passes because you cannot be reasonably certain about how a modern hard disk stores data on the platter. If the encoding is unknown, then writing random patterns is your best strategy.

      In particular, Gutmann says that "in the time since this paper was published, some people have treated the 35-pass overwrite technique described in it more as a kind of voodoo incantation to banish evil spirits than the result of a technical analysis of drive encoding techniques. As a result, they advocate applying the voodoo to PRML and EPRML drives even though it will have no more effect than a simple scrubbing with random data... For any modern PRML/EPRML drive, a few passes of random scrubbing is the best you can do".

      Read these papers by Peter Gutmann:
    19. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the field. According to Chapter 8 of the NISPOM, sanitizing disks cannot be performed on disks that are bad. The platter(s) must be removed and then ground to a powder.
      If a disk is good, sanitizing can be done with a three time overwrite using authorized software. If the disk will remain in a classified environment, data clearing can be performed with a one time overwrite. DSS and DISA follow NSA's recommendation on using Ontrack's DataEraser (it has been validated). If you want, you can test other software or methods (ie.: dd and other products mentioned in the threads) and keep your test results handy for proving the results for the next inspection. Keep in mind that the SSP and cognizant security authority must allow for sanitization / clearing in the first place.
      As for a all in one box, I keep an old caseless pc around with ide, sata, and various scsi adapters in it just for the purpose of scrubbing drives...
      MAN IN BLACK

    20. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      you can always just dd /dev/random onto your disk

      Don't do that. Use /dev/urandom. /dev/random blocks waiting for entropy and will take almost forever. /dev/urandom is less secure in a certain highly technical sense that isn't relevant to this application; for drive wiping, it is nonetheless the correct one to use.

    21. Re:Still Risky by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Yep, keeping the drive is even risky, it might be stolen.

      To destroy:

      Grind the entire drive using a grinder.

      Collect the particles as they are removed ( hopefully, intermingle this with other grinding "results" ).

      Send the particles to a reputable recycler of metals, 1/3 right away, 1/3 in a few months, the remainer sometime later.

      Oh, yeah, if you want to be extra paranoid, magnetize the particles.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    22. Re:Still Risky by Nikker · · Score: 1

      wouldn't you just be able to get a strong magnet, or is that just an old wives tale?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    23. Re:Still Risky by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Yup, on a recentish contract, we had 7000 drives to clear down. We looked at all the options, and chucking the drives in a waste skip with a load of thermite wasn't THAT much more expensive that the time to wipe the machines down with some LinuxBootdisk that had the option to write 7 times with 00 FF and then random amounts. If you think about the amount of time/energy/manpower to get the machines running the software (took around 80 mins to clear the drives), you can see how the thermite solution isn't as bad as it initially sounds. Assured data destruction.
      Alas, that plan wasn't finalised (getting hold of enough thermite and the time of taking 7000 drives out meant that there was a slight chance one of the drives wouldn't of made it, so we took the other route, much to my dismay.

      Thermite, only way to be sure.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    24. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when was the last time you cooked your pizza at 700K? ready in 15 seconds or its free?

      Although an oven for bricks (ie a Kiln) probably would do the trick...

    25. Re:Still Risky by dhandler · · Score: 1

      Correct - older, dead drives are not even worth trying to repair - just replace them. If they are non-functional, or flakey to begin with, you cannot be guaranteed as to the extent of whatever erase functionality they have performed.

      Most of our systems are diskless clients anyway, so we do not have too many worries about local data, but not everybody has that luxury.

      As a medical provider who also needs to maintain HIPAA compliance, we have decided the cost savings of RMA'ing a drive is nothing compared to the potential exposure, time the machine is down waiting for the part to come back and labor to reinstall and reimage the drive. Large capacity IDE drives are so cheap now we just put a new one in and reimage the machine.

      The old drives get their platters removed, the HDA gets its motor control and data cable cut and a slight "tap" to the controller board with a hammer to damage it and its done.

    26. Re:Still Risky by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      There are a number of commercial enterprises
      out there (OnSight Data Recovery, for one) that
      can recover much data from a failed drive, for a
      price. The methods they use work equally well
      in cases of failed electronics (controllers) or
      failed media (delaminated platters).

      AFAIK, the use of "dd /dev/random" does no more
      damage to the data on a drive than a malicious
      virus, which data recovery companies can work
      around. Symmantic (Norton Utilities) has a
      program that will overwrite all data on the drive
      a number of times. This procedure presumes that
      there is no physical or electrical damage to the
      drive that would prevent software access. It is
      my understanding that any software method used to
      delete or obscure data on a disk drive is not
      100% secure -- it merely makes such data recovery
      more time (and money) consuming.

      OTOH, if your organization uses good quality
      encryption (AES-256, RSA, or DDES as examples)
      on the "live" data, software designed to delete
      or obscure such data can be more effective. Any
      disk drive that has had a physical or electrical
      failure that prevents such software from working
      is a candidate for physical abuse (sledgehammer
      or belt sander applied to the media).

      One of the methods used by data recovery companies
      is to disassemble the failed drive and move the
      platters to a known-good host controller/head(s).
      With some care, this does not even require the use
      of a clean room, since the data only needs to be
      recovered once. Any competent hacker would have
      little difficulty in duplicating such efforts, if
      the data were worth the time. Sensitive medical,
      financial, or personal data could be compromised.

      Just my $00.02 worth.

    27. Re:Still Risky by meatspray · · Score: 1

      If you're going that far, just melt it down ;)

    28. Re:Still Risky by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      You could make some thermite (very easy) and incendary the little bugger yourself. Termite ought to burn through it very easily, and it involves fire which is fun! :-)

    29. Re:Still Risky by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... I disagree. I work at an organisation which falls under HIPAA. All the money we would spend on new hard drives for no apparent reason would mean that developmentally delayed persons in the community would be unable to get access to the resources we exist to provide.

      I know this is somewhat un-PC and off topic... but you know the words "developmentally delayed" mean exactly the same thing as the word "retarded"

      Why don't you pick a different word or just use "retarded" rather than fishing around to find a new PC word every six months.

    30. Re:Still Risky by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I know dell has one. My work has it. Dell will take us on our word that the HD is bad, and will send us a new one, without requesting the old one, which we destroy rather than give back.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    31. Re:Still Risky by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      But they don't necessarily need access to that data anymore, so you have to make sure it's not on their computer.

      HIPAA standards are a PITA, especially when you combine it with some of the military Rules of War.

      IE By geneva convention, you have to transmit medical information in the clear (no encryption equipment allowed in medical centers). But by HIPAA, you have to transmit personal medical information securely...

      And yes, I know that computers can be used as encryption systems, but realize just how old lots of the rules of warfare are...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    32. Re:Still Risky by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      I work in healthcare too. I believe HIPAA doesn't specify that you completely erase drives, just that you take "reasonable measures to ensure patient privacy" (HIPAA is wonderfully free of technical specifications in its 2400 pages of documentation). If you're doing any basic wipe of drives that prevent someone just installing a drive and seeing the data you're probably OK.

      But, you might consider why there is _any_ patient data on hard drives. If "Microsoft Office" is a primary application for patient stuff, you're going to have to deal with this forever. You might want to start migrating to server centric applications and thin client approaches to make sure the data stays someplace where it can be audited.

      In the end, there's lots more HIPAA exposure through CD-ROM burners, USB ports, print outs, and elevator gossip than an IT department that's bothering to wipe drives.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    33. Re:Still Risky by dorsey · · Score: 1

      I would assume though that they would still require *some* proof of destruction, such as returning a single specific piece of the drive, to curb people reporting problems whenever they want more drive space.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    34. Re:Still Risky by Chris+Hodges · · Score: 1
      Termite ought to burn through it very easily

      I haven't got access to termites - would ants be an acceptable substitute?

    35. Re:Still Risky by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      It occurs to me that we actually do something right in my shop. All user folers are on a server, be it NT, 2K, or Linux SMB type. We map their My Documents folder to it and then restrict where they can write on the local machine.

      Works like a charm - and when HD's break or people move they just log in and everything should be there.

    36. Re:Still Risky by zoombat · · Score: 1

      That's definately a good policy. Not only does it help with this particular problem, but it also makes backup easier. But people who are REALLY paranoid about security, might still be concerned about pagefiles and temporary files that get written to the hard drive that might still contain confidential information.

      And then you still have the original issue when server drives need replacing.. especially if you use RAID1!

    37. Re:Still Risky by yamla · · Score: 1

      Well, it used to be true but not so much any more. You'd need a super powerful electromagnet to have any chance of erasing the data securely. I mean, an order of magnitude or more powerful than anything your local radio shack will sell you.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    38. Re:Still Risky by prizog · · Score: 1

      In _It Must Have Been Something I Ate_, food writer Jeffrey Steingarten measured temperatures higher than that in pizza ovens in New York City. Here's an online source referencing Steingarten's book.

    39. Re:Still Risky by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Yes, but only if you can get fire ants.

    40. Re:Still Risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ??? How does that work then ???
      Those two seem to conflict with each other...
      It seems like one or the other would have to be violated or ignored.

    41. Re:Still Risky by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Pretty much, I've heard that you end up with some pretty interesting forms of 'non-encryption'.

      It's not the first time that the military has conflicting rules/laws.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  2. Question Mark ... by foobsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. (Score:5, Informative)
    by QuaZar666 (164830) Alter Relationship on Thu 16 Jan 04:03AM (#5091822)
    Now days the dod drills a hole through the platter on drives that are bad that have to be RMA'd and have contracts so all they have to return is the top of the drive with the label. as for drives they no longer need i do not know. im guessing they write 0 and 1 patterns on the drive 7+ times. (even then data recovery services could recover it)

    Silly, but I have this association:
    Ground control to major tom
    Your circuit's dead, there's something wrong
    Can you hear me, major tom?

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:Question Mark ... by winkydink · · Score: 1

      The data density per square inch on modern drives is such that drilling a whole through the platter leaves a LOT of data behind that can be recovered by a determined person. I suspect that classified drives are still destroyed much more thoroughly than this.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:Question Mark ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there buddy, lay off the caffeine.

    3. Re:Question Mark ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your post is like an Oreo cookie, the stuff in the middle is good, but what is with the crap at the top and the bottom? ;)

    4. Re:Question Mark ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that classified drives are still destroyed much more thoroughly than this.

      Call me a cynic but, I suspect that classified drives are either tossed in a dust bin or sold on eBay i fthey aren't too old.

    5. Re:Question Mark ... by rgmoore · · Score: 1
      I suspect that classified drives are still destroyed much more thoroughly than this.

      I'll bet that a little bit of thermite would do the job nicely. Or is that reserved for destroying everything in a hurry while your position is being overrun?

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    6. Re:Question Mark ... by winkydink · · Score: 1

      That's front page news, New York Time, top of the fold, if it happens and a long jail sentence for whoever let's it occur.

      I recall articles about drives with people's personal stuff on them, but not DOD classified information.

      In fact, I recall being in a facility with two networks some years ago. I was politely informed to plug my laptop into network connection A, not network connection B, because if I plugged into network connection B, my laptop was no longer allowed to leave the facility. OK, A it was. :)

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    7. Re:Question Mark ... by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of my jobs in the Air Force was destroying classified drives. This was almost ten years ago and we were much more thorough even back then. Think things that go "boom". I *really* miss that part of the job.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    8. Re:Question Mark ... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      1 word (or is it two?) Wood-chipper.

    9. Re:Question Mark ... by silentbozo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Overwriting only works if the drive is still capable of writing. I've dealt with drives so hosed after we got the data off, that we could barely wipe the partition map. There was still a lot of data left behind on the platter that we could no longer touch because the writing heads/drive electronics were in such bad shape, the drive refused to either be recognized, or to accept commands.

      In these cases, you have to decide: is it more important that you RMA the drive (in which case, you really can't do any truely destructive to the drive physically - I think degaussing falls under that, as it wipes out the underlying sector info), or do you smash up the drive and forego the drive replacement?

      BTW, if it turns out that degaussing is an accepted method of clearing the drive prior to RMA, please let me know...

    10. Re:Question Mark ... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      NSA sends their drives (and plenty of other equipment) through something like this, munching stuff to tiny fragments for recycling. Not sure how much of the recycling process happens on-site, but IIRC the final processing is done off-site.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    11. Re:Question Mark ... by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      A decade or so ago, somebody on sci.military talked about how they destroy disks that had classified data on them. It involved software deletion, and then melting it down to slag with a thermite grenade, and then taking the slag under guard to a secure landfill.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    12. Re:Question Mark ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having bought a Dell computer at Wal-Mart, I'm now programming XML in a secret DOD facility, the only way to leave that place was to change my name and I no longer exists.

    13. Re:Question Mark ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use thermite to warm my coffee in the morning.

    14. Re:Question Mark ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having bought a Dell computer at Wal-Mart, I'm programming XML missiles to destroy old classified drives for the Air Force.

    15. Re:Question Mark ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having bought a Dell computer at Wal-Mart, I was visiting the NSA secret drive munching facility and they told me where the drives are delivered for disposal, then I came here to write about it on slashdot.

    16. Re:Question Mark ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir,
      I would to quote you on this.
      Regards
      AC

  3. Data destruction. by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It really depends upon what level of security you are talking about. Degaussing certainly does not do the job adequately enough for some purposes, but the issue of maintaining a box that has all the hardware to be backwards compatible can be cumbersome and expensive. I suspect you are not in a sensitive/classifed government position as they have protocols for this sort of thing, but if you truly have seriously data sensitive needs for hard drives you are going to retire, I would suggest first formatting the drive with multiple writes and reads of serial 1's and 0's which should prevent 99.9% of data recovery attempts. An older G4 tower running OS X, should allow you to recognize and mount drives formatted with a variety of operating systems. Stick a couple of SCSI cards in it and an ATA and SATA card (Sonnet makes a combined card) which should give you multiple SCSI formats, ATA, Firewire and USB depending upon your needs. If you are really paranoid, actually disassembling the drives, degaussing and physically destroying the platters will finish the job. Believe it or not, data can even be reconstructed at the microscopic level through the use of electron microscopy, so the more damage done to the physical media, the harder it is to extract information.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Data destruction. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      HAHA a G4? Running OSX? AFAIK there is no OS on the planet that can handle reading more partition table formats and handle more actual filesystems than Linux. Also, bad hard drives sometimes kill computers, I have had it happen to me personally. It would be best to use the oldest PCI-bus system you have for this particular task, so if you kill it, you aren't sad when you throw it in the bin.

      If you TRULY are worried about the sanctity of your data, it should be written to disk only in encrypted form, the key should be stored on a removable device ONLY, and any unencrypted data means you take the platters out of the drives and melt them down to render them utterly unreadable. (Turning it into metal shavings would probably also do.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Data destruction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >I would suggest first formatting the drive with
      >multiple writes and reads of serial 1's and 0's
      >which should prevent 99.9% of data recovery
      >attempts.

      from the manpage of badblocks(8) I saw that:

      # badblocks -w /dev/hda

      does just this and better :-)

      But it's not an hardware solution and in the case of bad hardware could take a lot of time.

    3. Re:Data destruction. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      It would be best to use the oldest PCI-bus system you have for this particular task, so if you kill it, you aren't sad when you throw it in the bin.

      Since this is a labor intensive process, you also want a fast computer. Losing a G4 shouldn't be bank-breaking for any business.

    4. Re:Data destruction. by BWJones · · Score: 2, Informative

      OS X does not support Linux's ext2/3 and Reiser right now to my knolwedge, but there is an open source implementation of ext2 available for OS X. That said, OS X can at least boot ext2 filesystems. proc is also not supported, but the following are supported natively in OS X: volfs, union, synthfs, specfs, ramfs, nullfs, loop*, fdesc, devfs, deadfs, cddafs, WebDAV, SMB/CIFS, NFS, FTP, AFP, UFS, UDF, NTFS, MSDOS, ISO9660, HFS+ and HFS. Pretty impressive for an out of the box OS that is also easy to use and implement.

      Also, I am not sure what you mean by having a hard drive "kill" a computer. Unless you are talking weird power flux issues, running a HD off of a PCI card should protect you from just about anything.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    5. Re:Data destruction. by andreyw · · Score: 2, Funny

      And given that this will be done by a business, I suppose they won't choke on the ridiculous idea of buying an expen$ive, shiny Unix workstation just to trash it's OS and put an OSS alternative on it?

      Sorry folks... I love Linux, I love Macs - but the last thing I will do is by an Apple TO RUN LINUX ON IT. Damn.

      Here is a clue - $500 gets you an up-to-date Sempron Socket-A computer or an okay Socket 764 AMD-64 computer you can run Linux on. Fo' real, yo.

    6. Re:Data destruction. by Dancing+Primate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're wiping the disk, you don't have to worry about what filesystem(s) it contains.

    7. Re:Data destruction. by ximenes · · Score: 1

      That's very good for OS X (although I have never heard of the majority of those file systems, and a lot of them are network or not particularly useful). The real question is why do you need support for the filesystem when all that's needed is to low level format the disk and that sort of thing?

    8. Re:Data destruction. by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      I've had hard drives that if they were connected (at all), the computer wouldn't boot.

      Not exactly killing, since removing it resolved the issue, but strange things do happen.

    9. Re:Data destruction. by cft_128 · · Score: 1
      HAHA a G4? Running OSX? AFAIK there is no OS on the planet that can handle reading more partition table formats and handle more actual filesystems than Linux. Also, bad hard drives sometimes kill computers, I have had it happen to me personally. It would be best to use the oldest PCI-bus system you have for this particular task, so if you kill it, you aren't sad when you throw it in the bin.

      Did you read your parent? As they are only using this to reformat with multiple writes it doesn't need to read or write any particular filesystem, it only needs to be able to write over the entire disk, and the disk utility in OSX makes it very easy.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    10. Re:Data destruction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An acetylene torch does a good job, and fast. Perhaps not as much fun as a sledgehammer, though.

    11. Re:Data destruction. by claudius0425 · · Score: 5, Informative

      While this may seem at first to be just a one off joke, there is really alot to be said for torching a drive. In addition to the massive physical damage, you will heat the magnetic layers past their Curie point, so their magnetic orientation won't matter: they won't be magnetic anymore.

      Happy torching!

      --
      Phus. Sysiphus.
    12. Re:Data destruction. by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Here is a clue - $500 gets you an up-to-date Sempron Socket-A computer or an okay Socket 764 AMD-64 computer you can run Linux on. Fo' real, yo.

      Careful! For posting similar truths, I was downmodded to oblivion a few days ago...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    13. Re:Data destruction. by Rand310 · · Score: 1

      The point of running on a G4 is ease of physical use, not really software.

      The G4 can be opened and closed in under a second - a small latch on the side. Drives can be plugged in in as long a time it takes you to align the cable. And you "could" do this while its running (not advisable). It also can have a few PCI cards in it for any kinda drive you got.

      The G4 idea is a great one. I used it a lot this summer working for a school for checking for bad/good HDs we had in storage because it was just so easy to access.

      Apple not only makes OSX, but also a wonderfully engineered computer, its internals can be accessed so quickly and easily.

    14. Re:Data destruction. by silver_splatter · · Score: 1

      I don't really see the big deal of being able to read the partitions that you're about to destroy. All hard disk sanitation software I've used wipe the drive entirely without the need of being able to read the partitions.

    15. Re:Data destruction. by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Uh buddy... if I had been designing a similar system (to wipe disks), I would *not* use a computer case, not matter how well designed (yay G5 tower). A case means I need to spend time mounting the disks nside, and be possibly restricted by inside space to the amount of disks I can wipe at the same time.

      I would instead go with a custom solution... with the hd connector being a huge backplane containing tens of crevices similar to the ones on an ipod dock. Theory of operation - plop interface-specific adapter onto each disk (combines the power connector and I/O - sort of like SCA on Sun machines), plop disks into docks, turn off, go get coffee.

    16. Re:Data destruction. by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Crap... I mean turn *ON* and go get coffee :-))))

    17. Re:Data destruction. by pimpin+apollo · · Score: 1
      Not to be blunt, but I think you're missing the point. He's trying to wipe drives that are damaged and need to be RMAed - this would almost certainly preclude mounting them. Even if they would mount there may be sectors of the drive that are inaccessible and can't be overwritten.

      Let's say some simple spring jams and a drive head won't go past a certain sector (this may not be plausible, but bear with me). There's data still there, and once the factory fixes that little spring the drive works fine again, and the data on that part of the platter, that you couldn't wipe before, is now accessible to whoever gets the drive next. Odds are that won't be you but somebody who buys a refurbished drive. This is the scenario he's trying to avoid.

      Also, I don't think that electron microscopy's the problem. That's so far beyond the capacity of most that no one'd even be asking this question if that was an issue.

      I don't know if there's a real solution, but I think the best bet here might be trying to figure out what the common source of failure on a HD is - maybe 90% of failures have one feature in common - and figure out how to work around that.

    18. Re:Data destruction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know the majority of those filesystems simply because they're irrelevant -- they're internal filesystems to OS X, much like linus has the sorts of sysfs, rootfs, bdevfs, procfs, sockfs, pipefs, futexfs, tmpfs, eventpollfs, devpts, ramfs, usbfs, etc. Just check a /proc/filesystems on a Linux machine, it'll tell you about all the filesystems the kernel knows at that particular point (i.e., the fs's built into the kernel, or the fs's built as modules, and loaded).

    19. Re:Data destruction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A stick welder easily blasts through the case into the platters. Crank it up to a couple hundred amps and blast away with little effort. :)

    20. Re:Data destruction. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Labor intensive? We're talking about writing patterns to a drive. It's easy to plug in, and it requires practically no CPU time, just the fastest interface you can come up with. Even an old P133 should be able to keep up with the read capabilities of any hard drive, if it is not running Windows.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Data destruction. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In that case, there is even less reason to use OSX, because if you don't need that capacity, any old Free software will work. You could probably use the hurd if you wanted to, or NeXTStep x86. Or AmigaDOS, if you had a machine to run it. Why choose the most expensive option?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Data destruction. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Unless you are talking weird power flux issues, running a HD off of a PCI card should protect you from just about anything.

      A good short onboard a drive can kill the controller. I've had hard drives develop shorts that caused traces on the drive to burn right off the PCB. A dead controller can kill a machine; if you've never had a PCI card render a system permanently useless, you haven't plugged in very many PCI cards.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Data destruction. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's the sort of task where you end up waiting 5-15 minutes for the computer to clean the drive, but 5-15 minutes isn't always enough time for you to finish up on other big tasks.

      So you end up doing dumb, simple stuff like organizing small parts of the serverroom or something.

      It's exactly the type of task that I hate doing...

    24. Re:Data destruction. by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Man, that's exactly the type of task that I love.
      Get yourself a GBA!

    25. Re:Data destruction. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      We're talking about hard disk filesystems here. Linux has some level of support for each of ext2/3, reiserfs, xfs, jfs, minix's filesystem, UDF, FAT16/VFAT, FAT32, Amiga FFS, and a bunch I can't remember.

      How complete is the NTFS support in OSX anyway? The stuff that comes with the linux kernel is limited, but captive-ntfs works nicely...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Data destruction. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      I'll pay you $6.95 an hour to erase my data!

      But due to HIPPA regulations I'll need to shoot you when you finish...

  4. Uh, if the hard drive is dead by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Then you're not going to be writing anything to it anyway.

    The best you can do is use a degausser, since you can't open the drive without voiding your warranty.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by 2bitcomputers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are various levels of 'dead' For example a drive that is 'clicking' should be backed up and replaced asap, but you could still get usefull data from it. Likewise for a drive that is giving access errors.

      --
      -- Please insert another quarter
    2. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dead is boolean. You are either dead, or you are not dead. There is no "mostly dead" like in The Princess Bride. The closest you get is "almost dead", which we call dying. Attempts to call a hard drive which still works "dead" will be met with contempt by more reasonable people.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT but I had a DeathStar that started making clicking noises over a year ago. I kept using it and creating an automated back-up nightly, this went on for a year with the clicking getting louder and louder. Finially I got so fed up with it not dying I just threw it out.

      Frikkin' IBM.

    4. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Rei · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my old Cheetah. I had a sentimental attachment to the old 4.5 gig drive (because it was a 10k rpm scsi, which at the time in the mid 90s was incredibly impressive for me to acquire on my broke-college-student budget; I had a lot of fond memories with that drive :) ). However, it started making noise - not clicks, but a really loud whine. Eventually it became insufferable, and I had to replace it; it now adorns my wall, right next to the dual-P-pro board that it served most of its life under ;)

      Drives making noise aren't necessarily about to drop dead. They can have a lot of life left, if you're willing to bear with them. You just need to be ubercautious.

      --
      sed "s/SJW.*$/... never mind. I was about to say something stupid, and also, I'm a troglodyte./Ig"
    5. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by (H)olyGeekboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you may have been intending humor, but there are cases where the drive's mechanisms (spindle motor, controller board) may be dead but the platters intact and full of data.

      I agree with my grandparent post. If the drive isn't spinning up or recognized by BIOS (technically "dead"), how are you going to wipe the data besides destroying the platters or at least degaussing.

    6. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by budgenator · · Score: 1
      how about
      su -c"shread -f /dev/hdb"
      wipes the disk about a clean as is possible, this commands writes a series of hex values to the block device i.e. the whole disk drive, that even with the various encodeing schemes ensures that every byte is flipped on the disk surface at least once and repeats the process 25 times. If anybody wants the data bad enough to read through all of that, it would be easier for them to have you picked up by the black helicopters and tortured untill you gave them everything anyways!
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    7. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most "dead" drives are at a point where you will not be able to write to all of the sectors of the drive. For example, bad sectors that have been spared out and copied to good ones by the drive's internal firmware may still be at least partially readable by someone with the right setup. So, even if you can put them into a system to write an approved erase pattern onto them, you don't have a guarantee that all of the data is really gone, just 99% of it.

    8. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      So BSD is _____, Jim? (Fill in your own damn blank, I don't have karma to burn)

    9. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead is boolean. You are either dead, or you are not dead.

      Obviously you didn't follow the Terri Schiavo case.

    10. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they do make a device designed for exactly this purpose!

      IDE drive "cleaner"

    11. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I remember getting a really bad whine on a drive on an old XT. At the time, (mid 1980's) the company had an internal equivalent to newsgroups, and others had had this problem, and a solution.

      It was the grounding strap for the spindle - since the contact was made on soft metal, eventually the spindle wore a little divot into it, and it started chattering. The fix was simple, just loosen the screw and move the strap a little. After a while, it wore a new divot in the new location, so you'd have to move it, again. A few moves and the PC was obsolete, and got replaced.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    12. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by karmatic · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've always been fond of "for device in urandom zero; do dd if=/dev/$device of=/dev/hdaX bs=512; done"

    13. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Well, according to Schrödinger, it's {not dead|dying|dead}. (You go ahead and observe it. I don't have karma to burn)

    14. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he followed it better than you did.
      Terri was not dead until her heart stopped beating. Before then, she was simply wounded to the point where it was painful to talk or eat.

      Someone dead (or "mostly" dead) wouldn't have been able to attempt saying "I want to live": http://www.rense.com/general63/dlive.htm

      --
      Luke-Jr
    15. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would only be painful, you dumb fuck, if Terri Schiavo had enough cerebral cortex left to interpret the impulses from her neurons.

      Since her EEG was totally flat, that isn't true.

      Patients with decerebral dementia commonly groan, and even laugh. What they don't do is think, feel pain, or try to speak.

      However, the relatives of such patients are often so desparate and in denial that they honestly believe such random physiological events are an attempt to communicate.

    16. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by thogard · · Score: 1

      More to the point, if you RMA a sick drive, then any attempts to write will simply write to the spare sectors and if the drive is messed up enough it may reallocate some of the 1st bad sectors (which have data that hasn't been overwritten) back to new blocks.

      So you can't wipe dead drives and you can't wipe sick drives which only leaves drives that don't need to be RMAed. That means that if you are in an industry where the stuff on the disk can not ever get into someone elses hands, then you can't RMA any dead or sick disks. Then you can destory them in a fun way.

    17. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Then you're not going to be writing anything to it anyway.

      The best you can do is use a degausser, since you can't open the drive without voiding your warranty.


      I used to work with a guy that worked at NASA with some classified stuff. He was the hard drive data destroyer. What he did was he went outside took the drives apart and smashed the platters with a hammer until they were small enough pieces to do nothing with and threw the pieces into a dumpster. Yeah, I guess its possible to get at least some info from a piece of a platter if one was properly motivated, but one would have to be very motivated, and I doubt that much info would be obtained. I also believe he degaussed the drives first.

      He also said that he had to negotiate an interesting contract with their hd vendor because he could not return a faulty drive.

    18. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Sometimes putting a "dead" drive in the freezer revives it for an hour or so.

      --
      sig?
    19. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Degaussing isn't always effective either. A degausser is designed to nuke tape in nonmagnetic, nonconductive casings. Hard disks are not only encased in conductive metal, the media layer sits on top of conductive aluminum disks. Eddy currents formed in both (most degaussers use an AC field) could serve to eat up much of the energy that, in the eraser's intended use, would be dissipated entirely in the media.

      Instead, why not insure total magnetic and mechanical destruction with a thermite sammich? In addition to royally gibbering up the innards, thermite should readily heat the platters above the Curie point of the media.

    20. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't painful, why was she unable to complete saying her sentence?

      Terri obviously was capable of thought. Her attempt at saying "I want to live" is only one example proving that.

      --
      Luke-Jr
    21. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Dead is boolean. You are either dead, or you are not dead. There is no "mostly dead" like in The Princess Bride. The closest you get is "almost dead", which we call dying. Attempts to call a hard drive which still works "dead" will be met with contempt by more reasonable people.

      I have resurected disk images from hard drives which would not spin long enough to complete the task. You know when a drive starts that click - spin down - spin up - click - spin down, etc syndrome? As far as I am concerned, a drive such as that is dead. However, I have found that Ghost will happily wait for blocks to become available while I unplug the power from such a drive and plug it back in. I get non-corrupt Ghost images doing this multiple times until the process completes and I can restore the image to a good drive.

      Would you call a drive that will run for no more than 2 minutes dead? I would. Yet I can image such a drive (before it decides to never spin up again).

      As far as destroying a really busted drive goes, a caustic soda / water mixture poured into the hole under one of the "void if removed" stickers does wonders. ; )

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    22. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Patients with decerebral dementia commonly groan, and even laugh. What they don't do is think, feel pain, or try to speak.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    23. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I agree that thermite is an excellent way to ensure that no one will read your disks, but it is A> toxic B> dangerous and C> will certainly void your warranty. If you have to send the drives back for RMA, this is not a working solution.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Uh, if the hard drive is dead by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      So then I guess she didn't have "decerebral dementia". Do you have a point?

      --
      Luke-Jr
  5. Home Depot by Sebastopol · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...44 Oz. Framing Hammer.

    Just explain to the RMA operator how you work for a "major construction contracting firm"...

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:Home Depot by kerskine · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Someone mod this informative - breaking the platters is the only sure-fire way to 'erase' a disk

      --
      ****

      "I'd never want to join a club that would have me as a member" - G. Marx
    2. Re:Home Depot by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      I agree. If the information is that sensitive, I would think it's worth the safety to just screw the warranty and physically destroy the drive. Every other solution I've heard of carries the risk of the data being recoverable, or just ends up taking time (rewriting the entire drive repeatedly, for example). Open the housing and smash the platter. You can even throw away the fragments spread over several collection days if you want to make it especially hard to recover data, but I doubt it matters at that point.

    3. Re:Home Depot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you can drop it in a vat of acid. absolutely no possibility of data reconstruction.

    4. Re:Home Depot by gent00 · · Score: 1

      Framing hammer= 22 Oz. + or - 2 Oz.

    5. Re:Home Depot by Shalda · · Score: 1

      At my last job, standard secure disposal proceedure for defective drives was to walk over to the machine shop and use a drill press to make 1/4 inch holes through the platters in at least 3 locations (in varying distances from the center). Anyone capable of recovering that data I'm sure could easily hack our system. You could use a handheld drill, but the press had a vice attached to the table and was just plain easier to operate. We'd just eat the cost of defective drives. For operable drives, we'd use either DBAN (Darik's Boot and Nuke). I just had a regular PC with a bootable CD in the drive for running this.

    6. Re:Home Depot by PB_TPU_40 · · Score: 1

      Personally I would have opted for the .44 Magnum revolver. Its amazing the ping sound that comes from those platers. Besides after, they're so warped they wont spin anymore. And lets not foget about the holes. And if the RMA operator asks, "Dude what the hell happened?" Just say Dirty Harry got pissed at your computer. Framing hammer, that requires multiple hits, 44 mag, one 4 pound trigger pull. I'm just lazy, but I also like shooting things. :D

      --
      -PB_TPU_40 The trick to flying is to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
  6. You could have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    provided some links, like what the heck is HIPAA? Wikipedia says Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, but that doesn't really make much sense to me.

    I realize this was a question and those people who don't know what HIPAA is probably shouldn't be answering, but still...

    1. Re:You could have... by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      It basically means that everyone who works in the medical industry has to jump through hoops to make sure that anything that could compromise your privacy doesn't get out without your permission. This goes to the extent that when working with MRI images for cross-site study, we have to use custom face-removing software so that someone can't reconstruct what your face looks like from the 3d data. And even then, there are debates about how much skull needs to be removed...

      --
      sed "s/SJW.*$/... never mind. I was about to say something stupid, and also, I'm a troglodyte./Ig"
    2. Re:You could have... by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Informative

      what the heck is HIPAA?

      Try the Health & Human Services - Office for Civil Right - HIPAA for some information. HIPAA is relevant to the article because it strengthened medical privacy laws.

    3. Re:You could have... by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

      It's the "accountability" part. Strict regulations on release of private patient information, securing of data, etc.

      --

      ~~~~~~~
      "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    4. Re:You could have... by moloney · · Score: 0

      It's for privacy reasons. Ever since HIPAA was passed, there are a lot of extra adminitrative steps that health care providers have to do to ensure patient privacy.

    5. Re:You could have... by farmkid · · Score: 1

      > Wikipedia says Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996

      Bingo. The key work here is "accountability". There are _major_ penalties for leaking client health info. I've worked with clients who would not, under any circumstances, email me test data (even though it was supposedly 'clean') unless it was PGP/GPG'd. Or others, who wouldn't email it at all.

      If you're talking HIPAA, you're talking paranoia

    6. Re:You could have... by gkuz · · Score: 1

      And you could have Googled the term before asking. I mean the first fucking link when you Google HIPAA is the US Gov's HHS site sub-titled "Medical Privacy - National Standards to Protect the Privacy of Personal Health Information".

    7. Re:You could have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you could have seen that 5 people already answered his question before replying like an ass.

    8. Re:You could have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of removing the face, why not add noise to it? With the right algorithms, it might be harder to reconstruct a face that way if, say, you make all the cheeks puffier by some arbitrary value. Or you could turn them into a block head. :)

    9. Re:You could have... by switcha · · Score: 2, Funny
      use custom face-removing software so that someone can't reconstruct what your face looks like from the 3d data

      Too late, man. They already did it.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    10. Re:You could have... by Rei · · Score: 1

      You still have to know where the face is, so it's easier just to zero it out.

      --
      sed "s/SJW.*$/... never mind. I was about to say something stupid, and also, I'm a troglodyte./Ig"
    11. Re:You could have... by sheepab · · Score: 1

      HIPAA is what makes my job as an IT drone at a major hospital SUCH A PITA.

      3.5 hours for their quizzes and such, ugh. HIPAA compliance this, HIPAA compliance that.

    12. Re:You could have... by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      I recently helped my boss do a powerpoint presentation on HIPAA.

      Basically, HIPAA itself doesn't directly mandate data security specifics, but the security rule which was created to accompany it does. This is the animation I inserted into my boss's powerpoint presentation to liven it up a bit. You may find it interesting...

      http://216.87.95.173/~will/starwars2.mpg

      That should be a link to the clip. It is themed as the opening crawl for star wars, but it says HIPAA WARS. A bit silly, but it made the all-staff rather amusing. It's hosted on my laptop, so if it gets popular, it may get slow. My apologies.

    13. Re:You could have... by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      Just a few peices of information about HIPAA:

      Every licensed health-care facility in the US is required to conform to this security act that keeps patient information confidential. It seems to have been written by paranoid schizophrenics for paranoid schizophrenics and is pretty stringent in its requirements--and pretty tough to follow every detail.

      The paranoia in this act is good, though. It is the kind of privacy that I think that we should be allowed to have. It actually makes the gov'ts job harder when they want to find information about someone's healthcare history. I like it overall, but for most folks, it is also a PITA.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    14. Re:You could have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This HIPAA WARS video intrigues me, but I get "You don't have permission to access /~will/starwars2.mpg on this server." :(

    15. Re:You could have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in the medical industry, you could send the disks in for a MRI scan...

    16. Re:You could have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is debatable. It does provide more protection
      against some people. But it made it easier for
      other people (and I care more about the people who
      have easier access) to get access to my medical
      records.
      You would be foolish to admit to any use of
      illegal drugs when questioned. This data is
      readily available to law enforcement and could be
      used against you if someone took an interest in
      you.
      Admitting to using legal drugs isn't so great
      either, as your insurance rates could be higher
      in the future.

    17. Re:You could have... by innosent · · Score: 1

      It actually makes the gov'ts job harder when they want to find information about someone's healthcare history

      Umm, no... If they want to know, they just ask. Often when a Medicare/Medicaid claim is filed, they will ask the provider for more information, not to mention the fact that the state will come in to inspect you, and look at several patient's information, every year. Refusal of either of these means that you either won't get paid, or you lose your license.

      Also, be aware that for many infectious diseases, both the laboratory and the physician are REQUIRED by law to report positive results to the local health department, which means that if you got a "confidential" HIV test, it's really only confidential if it's negative. In fact, the state asked us last year for a list of all HIV positive test results for the year (just screens, not viral loads for people who already knew they had it), because they expected us to have more than what we had reported. Same goes for Hepatitis, Chlamydia, HPV, Herpes, etc. Uncle Sam may not know what your triglyceride level is, but that's only because they don't care....yet. To practice medicine in the US means you have to play by their rules, whether that screws the patient or not (and the rules are always a moving target, but rarely move towards privacy).

      --
      --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    18. Re:You could have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cause the laptop is HIPAA-compliant...

    19. Re:You could have... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      That's hardly fair. He did. And clearly got the link you got. But since it isn't immediately apparent what medicine and hard drives have to do with each other, he assumed it wasn't that right link.

      He was mistaken. He asked. He was corrected.

    20. Re:You could have... by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. It is fixed now. If you had posted a UID or something, I'd try to send you a message. Oh well.

  7. dban.sourceforge.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    dban.sourceforge.net

    1. Re:dban.sourceforge.net by weighn · · Score: 1

      dban was my 1st thought, and its a very simple and useful tool.
      But it needs to be integrated into an appliance type device, which is what the gp is asking for.
      If you have a pile of HDDs for deletion (using differing interafaces) you're gonna want a quick way to plug /unplug those suckers.

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  8. DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by slashjames · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://dban.sourceforge.net/
    Good hardware detection, GPL.

    1. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by davidesh · · Score: 1

      agreed DBAN is really good and you can customize it to auto-nuke drives... I have used it several times.

    2. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by bozojoe · · Score: 1

      This is really an awesome utility, and its nearly simple enough to give to computer illiterate friends.

      cant say enough good things about DBAN

      --
      lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
    3. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by Cipster · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.tolvanen.com/eraser/

      Add eraser to the list of programs that might do the job.

    4. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Make SURE this disk is properly labeled, or you know EXACTLY which one it is.

      Bad things can happen otherwise if you think you're reaching for your network boot floppy...

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by davidesh · · Score: 1

      lol ya...
      joe schmoe "hey what is this john?"
      john doe "oh I don't know just boot it up and see"

    6. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, DBAN is set up to work on IDE drives only (no SCSI). Perhaps it's easy to modify for SCSI (recompile with the relevant SCSI modules?) but I haven't looked into it.

    7. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Sounds like something which might be fun to run at, say, net cafes. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    8. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by ErnieD · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll second that, I've used DBAN a few times just in the last few days on old drives we're preparing to toss (finally retiring very old hardware).

      I run it from the Ultimate Boot CD, http://www.ultimatebootcd.com, which has a ton of other diagnostic utilities on it, including the drive diag tools from all the major manufacturers. Extremely handy little CD to have around.

    9. Re:DBAN - Darik's Boot and Nuke by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Nope, site says it works for SCSI

  9. Norton Diskreet by wiredlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use good old Norton Diskreet (DOS version) and automate it with a batch file running on a tired old PC set out to pasture. All supplies are available on Ebay.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Norton Diskreet by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 1
      Use good old Norton Diskreet (DOS version) and automate it with a batch file running on a tired old PC set out to pasture. All supplies are available on Ebay.


      In addition, use external USB / Firewire enclosures for the drives. This will not only allow you to easily swap the drives you are cleaning w/o opening the case and rebooting, but will also allow you to run modern large drives easily on the old hardware.

      The more I think about it, Norton Diskreet, might very well have issues with USB mounted drives, but plenty of other drive cleaning software has been mentioned in this thread.

      --
      I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
  10. Two Ways by BrynM · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The first is the standard degausser. This may render the drive inoperable, but will erase data securely with just a run through the machine. An example I found was this. There are many more out there.

    The second method is to set up a *nix box with some hot swap drive bays and use that (I actually prefer this method). You can find removable bays all over the place and use *nix to format the drive writing all 0s to it.

    I don't think anyone makes a machine exactly like you describe, but both of these methods will do the trick. Good luck!

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Two Ways by theclam159 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be better to have a script constantly write and rewrite 1s and 0s randomly for as long as you have it running, than to just write 0s to it?

    2. Re:Two Ways by techfury90 · · Score: 1

      Or you could maybe dd /dev/random to the drive.

      --
      I'm friends with the youngest daughter of the former head of the PowerPC division of IBM you insensitive clod!
    3. Re:Two Ways by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Informative
      You can find removable bays all over the place and use *nix to format the drive writing all 0s to it.

      As I recall, you're better off using a string of alternating 1s and 0s, followed by a string of 0s and 1s, like so: 10101010 followed by 01010101. This maximises the ``change'' you're making on each pass, and so it messes up the traces of the old information the fastest.

      Back when we were still using Western Digital RLL boards, we used to write (and then read, of course) those patterns to a HD to stress-test it. If it could do that all night, always reading back what it had just written, it would probably save your data fro a while.

    4. Re:Two Ways by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      As I recall, you're better off using a string of alternating 1s and 0s, followed by a string of 0s and 1s, like so: 10101010 followed by 01010101. This maximises the ``change'' you're making on each pass, and so it messes up the traces of the old information the fastest.

      Actually, it doesn't. At least one reason is that RLL you mentioned, modern drives use RLL (run-length limited) encoding internally. One effect of using RLL is that the bits actually written to the disk are different from the bits being stored, because they are encoded. Thus a 10101010... pattern and a 01010101... pattern aren't necessarily exact inversions of each other.

      There are certain patterns that are more stressfull for a disk to record (i.e. more error prone) I do not know the physics behind them so I can't give a real example, but here's a made up one that sounds good - if the data you write out results in all 1's and the neighboring track has all 0's then the 1's might bleed over into the 0's and vice-versa.

      FWIW, there are somewhat similar issues with on-the-wire encoding for networking, look up 8b10 encoding for an example of an encoding method designed to reduce them.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  11. BCWipe by jascat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have used BCWipe to declassify Secret hard drives. They have a DOS version you can throw on a MS-DOS boot disk and a linux version you can put on a livecd. Either works equally well.

    1. Re:BCWipe by bani · · Score: 1

      Is BCWipe legally authorized for that use though?

    2. Re:BCWipe by jascat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From everyone I talked to at various levels, it is actually recommended. The important part is that it supports the DoD prescribed method.

    3. Re:BCWipe by ken-reno · · Score: 1

      What about the grown defect list? What if a large number of sectors with data are thought to be bad and marked as such by the drive? There could be lots of sensitive data in unacessable areas of the drive. I doubt this information could be erased from DOS or Linux.

    4. Re:BCWipe by bani · · Score: 1

      to me, "recommended" is quite different from "legally authorized". for example i'd want to make sure the product was the latter if i knew the penalty for failure would be having to face a congressional inquiry or grand jury.

      i'd certainly want to make sure the vendor's claims were certified for the intended use.

    5. Re:BCWipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, congress just had a hearing on BASEBALL... they could give two shits about what you do with data. This guy is on the right side of things, nobody's going to bug him for doing his job well.

    6. Re:BCWipe by HBI · · Score: 1

      There are several approved shredders for various different uses on the Army list. Some are full disk wipe varieties, others are single file shredders. Some are for Win32, some for Unix/Linux. The govt generally can't single source things, and this isn't an exception.

      That said, they all do the same thing: they overwrite the disk 7 times with a pseudorandom data set. The Mersenne Twister appears to be a current method of generating pseudorandom data nowadays.

      So, if you find some software that will do that, you are good. The ones on the list just got themselves certified, inherently that doesn't make any other tool invalid. The thing is, the other tools are generally from small software houses without a proven track record.

      I believe Symantec has an unapproved wipe utility, which I expect does the trick.

      Classified drives are physically destroyed, however. So, take that under advisement.

      For more details, google AR 25-2 (Information Assurance), which should tell you almost anything you'd want to know about how data is securely handled in the Army, and is unclassified.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    7. Re:BCWipe by TFloore · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is BCWipe legally authorized for that use though?

      That's easy...

      NO.

      BCWipe and other such applications will allow you to use a classified (up to SECRET only, nothing more sensitive) harddrive in an unclassified computer/network, but you must STILL track that harddrive, and physically destroy it when you excess the computer. The utility is approved for re-purposing the drive, but it must still be disposed of as any other classified storage, i.e., physically destroyed.

      TS and higher drives may NOT be re-purposed like this, they must be physically destroyed.

      Generally, "physically destroyed" means the drive must be disassembled, and the individual platters wiped with a magnet of a gauranteed minimum field strength. (Sorry, I'd tell you the required field strength, but I don't remember off hand.) After this, the platters can be disposed of just like shredded classified documents would be.

      10 years ago using BCWipe-style software was approved in DOD for declassifying harddrives. This is not the case any more. Pay attention to how harddrives work. They've gotten too smart for this to be guaranteed to wipe data now. They ship with "excess" sectors, and can internally remap any bad sectors to these excess sectors, reading data from them and copying it when the sector is internally detected as "going bad but still accessible". Data in these "bad" remapped sectors can be accessed when the drive is connected in diagnostic mode. If you have a classified storage device, within certain boundaries, you won't know if the drive has performed such a remapping and hidden classified data that could be recovered by an intelligent operator. Therefor, BCWipe-style software is only approved for re-purposing where you maintain physical control of the harddrive. To dispose of the harddrive, you must physically destroy it, basically because the drives have gotten too smart.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
    8. Re:BCWipe by Shanep · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To dispose of the harddrive, you must physically destroy it, basically because the drives have gotten too smart.

      Drives have been doing this for at least the past 10 years that I know of. My old WD Caviar and Maxtor 340MB drives did that around '94-'95.

      This is the reason that hard drives suddenly started appearing on the market with seemingly no bad sectors to be marked by the file system to avoid. The days of seeing "B" blocks in Norton Disk Doctor and trying to "recover" them were mostly over. The truth was that there were bad sectors, but they were remapped to spares to make drives look good and help to guarantee minimum storage. Due to this, if you had a drive that did exhibit bad sectors, because the spares were all used up, then you had a really bad drive. I always took such drives back.

      This is not new though.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    9. Re:BCWipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      After this, the platters can be disposed of just like shredded classified documents would be.

      A good quality paper shredder (like the one in my office) will shred CDs and disk platters.

      Although a poster above claimed that some recent drives use glass platters, so shredding them might not be such a good idea.

  12. A smashed drive tells no tales by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Precisely. Why RMA a drive if you're so worried? Smash it and bin the fragments.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by SYFer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Might I suggest the Wilton 20003 12 lb. Unbreakable Double Faced Sledge Hammer? At 12 pounds and with a shock absorbing handle, you'll find this fully OSHA-compliant device will serve your needs admirably.

      And yes, this most certainly IS an Amazon affiliate link. I believe that if the submitter or other government officials purchase this mission-critical security appliance, I am entitled to my consulting fee. As for the parent poster, well... Uh, I'll buy him a beer when the windfall from this new sledge hammer gig comes rolling in.

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    2. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is RMA?

    3. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Return Merchandise Authorization - basically you speak to the manufacturer of the dead component and if both parties deduce it is the company's problem and will fix or (ideally) replace said fuxxored doohickey.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    4. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Stopher2475 · · Score: 0

      That is friggin funny!

    5. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      just to be pedantic... its usually "return materials authorization"

      but, whatever.

    6. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why it's Ribomucleic Acid of course.

    7. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 4, Funny
      Allow me to embrace and extended.

      The sledge hammer is the linux style solution. More work than is needed, what you need is user convience. Sledgehammers will tire you out, you don't want to do that all day long. What you need is the Remington 870 pump action shotgun. Available in assorted sizes and gauges, the 870 can erase as many as 5 hard drives in a single loading. The 870 comes in 12 gauge, 28 inch barrel for those SCSI drives, down to a .410 shotgun for those hard to wipe flash drives.

      For maximum assurance of data erasure, the 870 cannot be beaten. Be sure to use number 3 shot or larger. Also available in left handed.

      The Remington Gauge system follows the approved national standard, to avoid vendor lock-in. Shells from all competitors will function, though Remington shells are recommended for best preformance. Never doubt if your data was securely erased or not ever again! Come to Remington Country.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    8. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by storm916 · · Score: 1

      This is not totally correct. While smashing your hard drive might work, it is possible to put the fragments back together in a clean room. This method is practiced by the FBI. I would presonally fragment the platters, then heat them up and scatter them into various places.

    9. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by gormanly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nice OS analogy: allow me to embrace and extend.

      The sledgehammer is a simple, solid and effective tool, yet requires a modest degree of effort. It is available everywhere there is human settlement, is cheap, and has no running costs. A sledgehammer never requires any form of licence or permit to use. It also just works.

      A pump-action shotgun may be easier for the lazy or weak to use; it may even be more fun. It certainly makes it easier to harm your neighbours, or shoot yourself in the foot. Remind you of anything?

    10. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 1

      Nah, nah, nah... you have to drive a steak through it, sever its head, burn both bits and then scatter the ashes in two different locations... remember to wear garlic whilst doing this to avoid ESD...

    11. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Kaydet81 · · Score: 1

      I found that a .444 magnum slug does the trick. Some older drives acutally stop the thing. I did this once & called the company help desk, saying that my drive was shot. That went over pretty good. Then I put it on display in the server room as an example. You know, shoot one, scare the rest...

      What I have yet to try, though, is to hook one up to a power supply & shoot it while (the drive is) spinning. I think that would be interesting.

    12. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by kintarowins · · Score: 1

      I think a much easier solution, and more effective would be to use a blow torch on this disk surface.

    13. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So by that analogy, a mac equivalent would be some kind of death ray made with always-working, intuitive alien tech?

    14. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      With only one button.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    15. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mac version is a little box with a firewire connection to the mac. You put the dead drive into the top like a slice of toast. When you do that a skull icon automatically appears on your desktop,clicking on it destroys everything on the drive. To get the nuked drive out you need to drag the icon to the trashcan.

      It costs $2399.95, but hey, it looks cool and it just works!

    16. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is still too much work, simply hook the hard drive up to a power supply and throw it in a bathtub full of water.

    17. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It certainly makes it easier to harm your neighbours, or shoot yourself in the foot. Remind you of anything?

      Indeed it does; allow my to modestly propose you install Microsoft Windows. It is almost guaranteed to corrupt whatever data you have on your disk. Plus it comes with Solitaire!

    18. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, not all hammers require lots of work to destroy a drive.

      http://www.littlegianthammer.com/

      Not only does the little gian make short work of any such task, but the design is so solid that it's remained virtually the same for 110 years.

    19. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      It certainly makes it easier to harm your neighbours, or shoot yourself in the foot. Remind you of anything?

      Yes. My marraige.

      Thank you for reminding me.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    20. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Heh that must be marriage. You can tell how damaged I am.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    21. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The chance that you will miss is too great for this to be a secure method. I recommend the Wile. E. Coyote method:
      Suspend an anvil over the edge of a cliff. Do not fall off of the cliff. Make sure the edge of the cliff won't break off. Make sure the suspension method is simple and secure. Do not let the anvil fall while it is above you. Do not test the suspension method by jumping on the anvil.
      Attach a string to the hard drive, and drag the hard drive under the anvil. Do not walk under the anvil. Make sure a large red X is placed in the right location. Drag the hard drive onto the big red X, and let it stay there. Do not walk under the anvil. Cut the rope suspending the anvil. Do not stand on the anvil or near the edge of the cliff. Do not let the ground you're standing on fall while the anvil stays in place. Make sure the anvil falls on the hard drive.
      Once the anvil misses the hard drive, find some dynomite...
      Something having to do with a cannon...
      Do not let the hard drive say "Meep Meep" and run away...

    22. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Allow me to embrace and extend some more.

      The sledgehammer, once you have it, is yours, and you can upgrade or customize it as you please. There are no licenses, and you can share it with everyone in your office.

      The pump-action shotgun will have recurring costs and will require periodic cleaning of the system and maintainance. In many areas, you will need a license to own and operate it.

      --LWM

    23. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good process--we implemented something like that where I work and, although I do not work for them or in any way mean to sound like a shill, the ACME corporation was our vendor of choice for the hardware involved. Check 'em out.

    24. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1

      Watch out for the botnets. They are killers.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    25. Re:A smashed drive tells no tales by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Then I put it on display in the server room as an example. You know, shoot one, scare the rest...

      I get medieval and mount the bad drive's heads on a pike.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  13. The Etherkiller by noidentity · · Score: 1

    Easy, just use the Etherkiller.

    (actually, not really; it'd just fry the controller, not the data on the disk)

    1. Re:The Etherkiller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're uh, lucky, it might catch on fire. I imagine that would provide a bit of data corruption.

  14. Sledgehammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always been a fan of the sledgehammer technique. It's fast, it's cheap, it's easy to maintain. Unfortunately, it pretty much nukes the RMA options.

  15. Drill Press by LighthouseJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hard drives are so cheap that you can just destroy the hard drive with a drill press. Afterall, they say construction workers that demolish buildings have the highest job satisfaction, you can get your own taste of that.

    1. Re:Drill Press by Ingolfke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you every tried to use a drill press on a hard drive that is being used? Man... neither have I, but when you do send me the pictures, ok.

    2. Re:Drill Press by gregeth · · Score: 1

      Haven't ever tried a drill press when running, but I have used a soldering iron. :)

      It's always fun to solder the head to the platter while spinning. Screwdrivers also do a nice job of making pretty cool designs into the drive. We've got a few hanging on the wall at my campus computer shop.

    3. Re:Drill Press by hobbesmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      WARNING: Following through on the screwdriver suggestion may shatter your hard drive platters while spinning at high speed causing little glass shards to go everywhere, including into your face. A friend of mine made this mistake once...

    4. Re:Drill Press by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The last hard drive I opened up had steel platters, not glass. Dunno how brittle the steel was, though,

  16. Degaussing is the way to go by ben_fucking_franklin · · Score: 2, Informative

    These guys will have a solution for you. They know how to recover the data. They know how to erase it past any hope of recovery.

    Disclaimer: Affiliations from past work experience.

    1. Re:Degaussing is the way to go by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Degaussing to NSA standards is very hard with modern high-coercivity media. See the NSA Media Destruction Guidance web page. Physical destruction (furnace) is usually simpler.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  17. Protein Stains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is your keyboard full of semen from pr0n? Do you wish you could get rid of those stubborn protein stains?

    NOW YOU CAN!

    Dishwasing your keyboard may not be enough to remove all the evidence. Get the HT-67 Protein Stain [topoftheline.com] remover for a introductory price of $8.95! That's right, for only $8.95 you will be able to fully remove semen that gets trapped.. deep... down... in the crevices of your keyboard.

    Just think, no more embarrassing conversations when company vsists and sees leftover residue on your keyboard. No more cover stories for your boss when he inquires about the state of your keyboard. This truly revolutionary cleaner is exactly what a slashdotter like you needs.

    Amazingly, the HT-67 protein stain remover can also remove blood, urine, food and icky dirt from your keyboard as well. Don't get caught another time with a dirty keyboard. Buy the HT-67 Protein Stain [topoftheline.com] remover today!


  18. Choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Automatic
    DoD 2250
    RMA

    Choose any two. You can't achieve three.

  19. Use a freaking hammer by tomRakewell · · Score: 2

    Smash the thing to bits! What's wrong with that?

    1. Re:Use a freaking hammer by four2five · · Score: 1

      Pun intended ?

      --
      -or so you'd think
    2. Re:Use a freaking hammer by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just smash it.

  20. Two Words by nebaz · · Score: 1

    Plastique Explosives.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats one word youdouche bag

  21. Unscrewed segment covered topic by wherley · · Score: 4, Informative

    See http://www.g4tv.com/unscrewed/features/45707/Dark_ Tip_Destroy_All_Data.html
    have a few pieces of s/w and h/w mentioned there. use the floppy method on a standalone machine to plug your disk into and wipe it. try Darik's Boot and Nuke method: http://dban.sourceforge.net/

  22. sandblaster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    open the drive, thoroughly sandblast all the platters on both sides, and you're done.

  23. Complete destruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, whenever I need to completely destroy a hard drive, I just have Reza Lockwood sit on it, when she gets that fat ass off of it there's basically nothing left but quarks

  24. Drive Duplicator... by hated · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.driveduplicators.com/124.html

    Its primarily a hard drive duplicator but it also has DoD 5220.22-M level wipe. Sorry to plug a specific product :)

    1. Re:Drive Duplicator... by bani · · Score: 1

      Looks hella expensive though. Something you'd expect to see MiB toting around, not civilians.

    2. Re:Drive Duplicator... by hated · · Score: 2, Informative

      The portable appears to be $379...not too bad. If they're looking for HIPAA complaince they should have at least that much to spend. I guess its up to their management though. If they don't want to spend the money then they will have to accept the risk and explain to any auditors why they don't wipe drives.

    3. Re:Drive Duplicator... by Ssolstice · · Score: 1

      Looks like a nice piece of hardware. But, is there one that supports SATA, too?

    4. Re:Drive Duplicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The compay that makes these are working on a version 2, that has SATA support.. but still no fiber channel.. oh well..
      I have one of these myself. just remember the DoD format takes a long time to do..
      Also these units can repair a lot of problems with drives, and then print out a report for you..
      That is all..

      End of Line...

  25. Some ideas for start by b374 · · Score: 0
  26. I have.. by Heem · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have such a machine. I call it "Sledge Hammer"

    also a great stress relief tool, ala "Office Space"

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
  27. Slag it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No way anyone is getting data off this sucker: slag it!

  28. The Only way to be sure... by hubang · · Score: 1

    Fire.

    With all the advances in data recovery, and the cheap cost of EIDE drives, it's the most effective solution.

    1. Re:The Only way to be sure... by nguyenhm · · Score: 1

      Take off and nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure

  29. Gnu coreutils provides `shred' by wild_berry · · Score: 2, Informative

    You must have seen Shred mentioned in the previous discussion. It's GNU coreutils so comes as standard with most Linux (ahem: GNU/Linux) distributions, and deals with file references in your filesystem.

    Shred is not complicated enough to waste files that has been stored on a journaled filesystem, which includes NTFS, ext3, ReiserFS and friends. This doesn't stand in the way of you plugging in a device, for example by USB/Firewire enoclosure), having it automount, according to your distribution's setup, before running "shred -z /dev/blah" to the device. The man pages say that this will write random data 25 times across the device before zeroing it, making a mess of the filesystem and the files too, whether or not they're stored with journaling data.

  30. Easiest solutions by nxtr · · Score: 1

    Do a couple of formats/reformats with various filesystems. Write lots of data to the disk and then delete it. When you send the disk back, make sure it has a filesystem different from what it had before. And make sure it's an encrypted file system.

    If all else fails, just overclock your PCI bus enough so that your system boots but your hard drive controller writes crap to its hard drives.

  31. hardware solution, no computer required by v1 · · Score: 1

    Go to http://www.granitedigital.com/catalog/pg28_firewir eidesmartlcdbridge.htm and pick up one of their FireView firewire bridge boards, with display. This is a conventional IDE-to-firewire board, but has a diagnostic system on board, with a two line alphanumeric display and two menu buttons. With this, you can tell the hard drive to do a low level reformat, without even hooking it up to a PC. All you need is a regular USB or firewire external hard drive case and replace its regular bridge board with a FireView.

    The FireView also does a lot of other nice things, like checking SMART status, displaying SMART error logs, enabling or disabling SMART, telling you thruput, status of both firewire ports and the computers you've plugged them into, etc. It can also invoke the short and thorough self-tests in the hard drive's firmware to check for problems.

    It's also got a short reformat that just blasts the partition map, useful for those HDs that have a hopelessly confused partition table that hangs any machine you boot them up in.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  32. The ONLY current method proven to be secure by hellomynameisclinton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These guys have even done the demonstration for you:
    http://driveslag.eecue.com

    1. Re:The ONLY current method proven to be secure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not have to be quite that extreme.. heat it up enough to change the hysteresis curve significantly and then degauss. allow it to cool in the presence of magnetic field.. either way though you're probably not using the drive again.

  33. Is the drive dead or not? by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

    Is the drive dead or not?

    Seems to me the drive is either working or it isn't.

    If it's not working, software erasure isn't going to work. If it is working, it's not broken.

    Just my $0.02

    Michael

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  34. Autoclave by s0abas · · Score: 1

    I use Autoclave. Although people don't support it anymore, I've never had a problem with it.

  35. Announcing.... by nilbog · · Score: 1

    The Slashdot search engine! Just type in your search query with as much detail as possible and have a thousand slashdot monkies find the answer!

    --
    or else!
  36. This is what you're after... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plug it in.
    Insert drive.
    Done!

    http://www.experteraser.com/degausser

  37. just smash the platters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only method that I am comfortable with is to smash the platters after using a military grade format (there are a bunch of linux utilities out there for this).

    format the hds, then you pop the lid, take a screwdriver, and lever the screwdriver such that the platter smashes

    there is no such thing as truly deleted information off of hd's unless melted, smashing them to a fine dust gets the same result as the platers are brittle and shatter into incredibly tiny fragments.

    note: it helps to have a cloth material to cover your hands/plate and make sure the shards don't fly all over the place.

    for me the primary motivator is being able to sleep at night knowing just how much effort someone would haveto go through to actually reassemble the data of a military grade format and a shattered platter to actually get anything usefull out of them.

    conversely, just as a heads up, there are tools out there that let investigators retrieve data out of the spaces 'between' the actual bits. because of certain magnetic properties, some data actually gets stored inbetween the bits and can be read and used to 'reconstruct' data if someone has access to that really expensive tool. on the other hand, with a shattered platter, good luck.

  38. If it's that important, destroy the drive by davidwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think HIPPA requirements are met by the electronic equivalent of a cross-cut shredder, destruction beyond all possible recovery is not required. A multi-pass overwrite is probably enough. Almost all bootable Linux CDs have the basic tools to do this, but you may find it handy to write a shell script to automate the process. Some may even have e-z shredders right there in the KDE or Gnome menus. Get a distro that reads USB drives and an external USB/IDE box and you are in business.

    Another possiblity is to use Bart's PE Builder and one of many MS-Windows-based shredders to make a bootable MS-Windows XP CD that does the same thing.

    If overwriting the data one or more times does NOT meet legal requirements, then you should overwrite the data once as a precaution in case someone steals the drive before you can permanently erase it, disassemble the drive, drill holes in the platters, then heat the platters, including the drilled-out parts, long enough to completely degauss them. A fireplace should do the trick, but an autoclave or better yet a pottery or cement kiln would do a better job. A kiln might actually melt the platters, which is pretty much the ultimate in data destruction.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:If it's that important, destroy the drive by innosent · · Score: 1

      First of all, it's HIPAA.

      Second, HIPAA requirements are never met. Ever.

      Third, if you ever really tried to meet HIPAA requirements, you would either:
      a) need DNA samples of every person in the world, and physically meet with, swab, DNA compare, have a judge verify the DNA results with a court order, and perform all interactions with the patient in a sound-proof chamber. Also, don't even write the patient's name down, that could be considered insecure. Any results you receive must not identify the patient (and ideally would not identify the results, either; in fact, you're better off just handing the patient a blank piece of paper and collecting for the office visit), just in case they fall into the wrong hands. You should bill the insurance company, using the same meet, swap, test, sound-proof method as with the patient, only you shouldn't tell them what you did, or how much you charge. Note that no law requires them to pay you for your trouble. You shouldn't use a computer to document any of this, or document this in any way; in fact, you probably shouldn't even know that you're doing this. If the computer (or paper, or you) were to fall into the wrong hands, the patient's privacy could be compromised.

      Alternatively, you could: b) let the patient die, walk it off, take 2 aspirin and leave you alone. But don't let the patient identify themselves, or identify what is wrong with them, since that would be PHI (Personal Health Information), which is protected by HIPAA, and it's just to dangerous for the patient if you know about it.

      Basically, the key part for us is the security rule, which pretty much says "if you know it, make sure nobody else could possibly find out about it from you, or you're #@!*ed". They then go on to suggest proper PHI security methods, such as "unplug your computers, cut the microphone wires from your telephones, remove all ink/toner from printers, and mind-wipe all employees at 15-minute intervals" (no, not really, but eerily close, you really are screwed if even the most trivial thing COULD be disclosed, they do in-fact specify that all transmissions between computers must be encrypted, even within networks which are not accessible from the outside, though without specification as to what encryption must be used, just that it better not be broken).

      --
      --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
  39. Have you tried... by Valiss · · Score: 1
    --

    -Valiss
  40. An embedded PC-driven entropy rewriter/degausser by ikewillis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...is my recommended approach. I actually built one of these myself, powered by an embedded Linux PC that boots from CD-ROM. It uses modular exponentation to generate a cryptographically random sector distribution list, to which it writes entropy data generated from an onboard Random Event Generator. It repeats this process 10 times consecutively, then cuts power to the drive and degausses the entire disk. This process is extensive enough to ensure that even the world's most sophisticated data recovery experts will recovery nary a bit from such a drive, and I've automated it to a plug and play process. Simply insert the drive into the degaussing chamber and attach data and power cables, then throw the switch. Wait about an hour or so, and the drive comes out irrevocably blank.

  41. Already Covered the Best Method by JungleBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Slashdot already covered the best method of data destruction.

    Drive Slagging!

    --
    "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
    -Calvin
  42. One word: Thermite by jamesshuang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Drop a nice little mixture of aluminum and iron oxide on the drive, ignite it. Nothing will retrieve that data, not even electron microscopy.

    1. Re:One word: Thermite by greysky · · Score: 1

      Just be careful. You might also say goodbye to your house.

  43. If you care that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry about the warranty. Just shred the drive. If your data is that valuable, the price of the drive doesn't matter by comparison.

  44. Two words by adolfojp · · Score: 1

    Two words

    Shotgun

    It also does wonders on zombies :-)

    Cheers,
    Adolfo

  45. Don't worry about erasing it... by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1
  46. curie point by dfuller · · Score: 2, Informative


    There is no substitute for heat.

    Cook the drive past the Curie Point with a
    blowtorch. You'd be amazed what folks can recover
    from drives even if they've been "destroyed."

  47. use the shotgun method. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 2, Funny

    load it into a skeet shoot device, launch it, and shoot it with a shotgun. repeat until its blown up good.

  48. This will not work... by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I am fairly certain that the only way to get this done is by causing the IDE hard drive to fall from a metal catwalk into liquid metal. I tried using liquid nitrogen and a hammer once but when I woke up in the morning the hard drive was reconstituted back inside my box and all the data was intact.

    I am pretty sure that SATA drives need a priest, holy water, a crucifix, and a copy of the Roman rituals.

    And I just use a shotgun (or chainsaw) on my CD-RW's because the only way to stop them is by "removing the head, or destroying the brain."

  49. I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I say we take off and EMP nuke them from space. It's the only way to be sure.

    1. Re:I say... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 1

      With some of the hysteria surrounding security, HIPAA and the like, that isn't far off. I have dealt with a pharmacy, and their security regulations were absolutely insane. They never stand back and look at what they're trying to guard...NOBODY CARES that Granny Smith got her prescription for anti-phlegm medication filled on the 3rd of April. The records in particular that they were guarding in a bomb-proof safe had no personal information on them (beyond name and prescription)...but yet they INSISTED that three backups be made per day, one of which was taken to an off-site location. I would wholeheartedly agree that the best solution would be evaporation in an electron-beam furnace, deposition of the vapor on some copper plates, and their jettisoning into a black hole.

    2. Re:I say... by boodaman · · Score: 1

      It's not about someone stealing Granny Smith's data. It's about Granny Smith suing the pharmacy because someone stole her data. Imagine a pharmacy that fills 10,000 prescriptions. Now imagine half of that data gets compromised. That's 5,000 potential lawsuits. Even if the lawsuits are bogus, the pharmacy is still going to incur costs dealing with them, not to mention any insurance premiums that might go up and any loss in business if word gets around on the street that dealing with that pharmacy is a good way to get your identity stolen. My Dad's retired...fear of identity theft is HUGE in the senior population...I'd say people are more afraid of that now than they are of getting terminally ill. Insurance covers getting sick, nothing covers someone cleaning out your life savings and leaving you to eat cat food.

    3. Re:I say... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My point is not that there are people out to "get" other people...my point is that, if there is a security hole, it was not in what they were expending most of their effort in combating. Did they shred, burn, atomize, and scatter every last recepit from the operation? Probably not. Did they make sure nobody was secretly recording Ms. Smith while she read off her personal information to the pharmacist? Probably not, too. It seems so much "security" these days is devoted to expending vast resources on things that make very little difference. As an example, a small airport near me recently built a $500,000 "security fence" to keep out "terrorists." Complete with flashy card readers for the gate and computer accounting. Of course, if you walk 50 feet to the south, you can walk right through a corn field onto the main runway, but hey, it looks good! If people were more intelligent in apportioning their security resources, rather than worrying about ABSOLUTELY atomizing somebody's hard drive, then we'd be money ahead. There's always going to be that .03% on either end of a 6-sigma bell curve...don't worry about it.

  50. Have you THOUGHT that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe in his case the expected risk is nonzero, but still less than the cost of the harddrive?

    I mean, obviously he must have considered (and dismissed) the obvious DeSTroY DA DrIvE before asking his question.

  51. Safest Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best method for securely erasing data from Hard Disks is to configure the jumpers correctly; the jumpers that normally choose master/slave, if you jumper *all eight* connecters and then power up your PC, the drive will be securely erased. Then remove the jumpers and reformat.

  52. Detail please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RMA is,

    Return Material Authorization
    or
    Return Merchandise on Account
    or
    Return to Manufacturer Authorization
    or
    Returned Merchandise Authorization

    What did you sign and what are the exact terms?

    Then it's a question of getting a HDM (Home Depot Method) that fits those terms.

    A serious secure deletion process is to hold the platter with vice grips and dress the surface down on a stationary sander. The drive is junk, but the cost of the drive is very small compared to your data risk if you're serious about this. Anything but destruction can be compromised.

  53. But if it's a dead drive.. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    How would you use anything to destroy the data through the bus on a dead drive - the reason you're replacing it in the first place?

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:But if it's a dead drive.. by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1

      Touche, the poster is missing a few platters in the drive.

  54. Boot and Nuke by UnseenEnigma · · Score: 1

    Its a cd based linux distribution that will 0 fill a drive very easily. Great tool. First thing I had to do at my job was clear 25 old drives for recycling (aka donating to employees). Using 3 computers I cleared all the drives in less than a day

  55. Wiping Drives..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Killdisk for single PC's, it has several different wiping methods, and also lets you make a bootable floppy which has SCSI drivers on it. For server drives(Ultra 2,3,Ultra 160 and 320) I find it worth the time to setup a server to an array( 4214, PowerVault,etc..)and set up one logical drive and wipe that. Sdelete also makes an excellent program, but it does not boot the machine, so an OS is required, which makes it less usefull. I resell all of my drives( well, the ones that are working) and using a degausser is not possible.

  56. Try This by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

    Check out http://blackbagtech.com/hardware.html The FBI will soon be carrying them at all times when they wanna copy your stuff (seriously). This will do shredding too but no SCSI http://diskology.com/

  57. You have been trolled. by AJWM · · Score: 1

    Seriously. If you're RMAing a drive because it's dead, there ain't no magic appliance that's going to bring it back to life long enough to erase (read "overwrite", because that's what really happens) the data.

    And no external magnet is going to erase it either. Well, not short of the kind of magnets they use for MRI scans.

    If you just want to make sure the drive is unreadable before disposing of it, use a drill press.

    --
    -- Alastair
  58. bad blocks are remapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that the drive controller may have remapped some bad blocks, which could be read back out. You might find just overwriting the 'whole drive' doesn't overwrite these.

    Also, if you are RMA'ing it, its probably bad, so nothng will properly write to it.

    I would suggest that you need to destroy the media.

    if they are scsi drives, you may find you can write a command to them directly with e.g. freebsd's cam to cause them to do a selftest which writes all the media including the bad blocks.

  59. ObKarmaWhoring by bani · · Score: 1

    I use an external firewire enclosure and wipe to nuke drives that I ebay.

    There's a self-booting CD diskzapper that looks like it ought to do the trick, though I have not used it.

    Other posters mentioned Darik's Boot and Nuke as a floppy-boot solution.

    The ultimate boot cd has a number of different disk wipers on it -- and a ton of other useful utilities on it. No self respecting geek should be without a copy.

    The Recovery Is Possible bootable CD has a copy of wipe on it.

    I wouldn't be suprised if Knoppix-STD had some erasing tool on it too, though I haven't checked.

    Anyone know of a bootable image suitable for USB flash sticks?

  60. Solution for dead drives to be RMA'd by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If you are a "big" shop, have an agreement with your vendor that says "some percentage of our drives are used with sensitive data, and when we return dead ones they will be returned in pieces, without the platters. If they are under warranty you will replace them no questions asked." Expect to pay a premium for this privilage.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  61. Degaussing alternative by Jerf · · Score: 1

    Attacking the magnetic media is surprisingly hard. Doable, as other posters have said, but hard.

    Let's stipulate that my solution to the literal question is let the pros do it (which also addresses the liability issues).

    So I have another question. Heat is hard on magnetism. What if we hit the drive with an oxy-acetylene torch? Would you have to melt it (expensive), or would the hard drive stop being recoverably with an electron microscope long before then?

    I'd prefer this be answered by someone with experience in the relevant materials science; I can pull an answer out of my ass, too.

    1. Re:Degaussing alternative by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      All you need to do is heat it above the Curie point. Basic physics.

    2. Re:Degaussing alternative by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Any thoughts on what that would be for magnetic media?

      I'm think it might be both easier and more reliable than a degausser.

  62. If it's that important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then have your client add the cost of new drives to their IT budget and destroy the bad ones really good with a sledge hammer.
    It's the way I do it. So much easier, yet somehow fulfilling, and you still make money.

  63. CSC repair device does it by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    Here: http://www.softwareandstuff.com/TOL10248.html

    Anyways, it can repair as well as delete.

  64. Try a Microwave by Aurelfell · · Score: 1

    A minute or two on high will delete any magnetic media quite effectively. Works fairly well on CD's too.

    May not be the best thing for the microwave though.

  65. Uhh by AtOMiCNebula · · Score: 1

    You can't RMA the bits. The summary says he wants to wipe all data off drives so he can RMA them and not worry the manufacturer will be able to see anything.

    1. Re:Uhh by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      If you have a harddrive that has data on it that needs to be scrubbed at this level, you don't RMA the drive afterwards. You distroy it. I would recommnd the hammer approach, a 16 pounder would be nice. But you could always do what I've done before. Take them out to the target range. Trust me, nothing is more satisfying than putting a slug in to a piece of computer hardware.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:Uhh by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can't RMA the bits.

      Why not? Just say it fell down some stairs.

    3. Re:Uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The HDD slipped on a cake of soap in the shower...

  66. Cover the real data w/ other data by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    Just cover up the medical data with a bunch of illegal porn.

  67. Magnet and shiny bits collection! by peter1 · · Score: 0

    I did a contract at a local hospital a while back, during the upgrade of most of their desktops. Since the old systems were PII/350's, they were just disposed of, but because of HIPAA we had to pull the drives out. In order to safely destroy them, we would take the drives apart and pull all the magnets out, bend the platters and then dispose of them. Got a great collection of some really strong magnets out of it!

  68. pee on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a top secret agent for the CIA. when we need to destroy a drive, I just pee on it. The amonia in the urine destroys all of the data.

    1. Re:pee on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is amonia in your urine? i'm not sure that's healthy... you might want to get that checked out.

  69. What kind of drives are you using. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    smashing them to a fine dust gets the same result as the platers are brittle and shatter into incredibly tiny fragments.

    note: it helps to have a cloth material to cover your hands/plate and make sure the shards don't fly all over the place.


    What kind of drives are you using? All the drives that I have destroyed, in the past 5 years or so, had platters made out of steel or aluminium. The platters would bend, scrape and even tear after a while but, none of them ever shattered. You must be using liquid nitrogen or something.

  70. Depends on the data, (final post) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two levels of wiping drives. And it all depends on the data.

    0. Some SCSI utilities can do a basic wipe of data. Good for cookie recipes.

    1. Software wiping
    See the following paper
    Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory

    Peter Gutmann
    Department of Computer Science
    University of Auckland
    pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
    A very good paper on the software wiping techniques is at
    http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/sec ure_ del.html

    Then run a very good wipe program.
    See Eraser, BCWipe, McAfee Shredder, etc.
    I know Eraser is very good, not sure about the others.

    2. Destroy the data and medium
    Pick your favorite method.
    a. Take the drive apart and degauss
    b. or Grind the platters
    c. or Throw the platters in a smelting furnace, aka Terminator.

    WhatMeWorry!

    FINAL post. What other info is needed.

  71. Old PC + DBAN or Eraser by peacefinder · · Score: 1

    An old PC and a copy of DBAN works just fine for me. But while I do decommission drives with HIPAA in mind, I don't do more than a few every year.

    But I like that USB-IDE idea... in combination with the GPL'd Eraser it should make wiping old drives a lot easier for me, and let me get rid of that dusty dinosaur I keep around for wiping drives.

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  72. securing drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put your old drives in a couple black suitcases and abandon them in front of any federal office building. There may be some personal risk involved and it may be 10-15 years before you get to install the new drives.

  73. Destroy them by agoliveira · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you prize so much the confidentiality of the date to go to very extreme measures like high level gear just for that, as cheap as the HDs are now, I would just throw them inside a furnace.

    --
    Scientia est Potentia
  74. a big heavy magnet? by Kopretinka · · Score: 1

    Not all in jest, may I suggest just using a big magnet in the form of a hammer with which a 5 year old kid will smash the drive to dust? Combining the physical damage/destruction with the repeated strong magnetic influence, this should be enough for anyone. 8-)

    --
    Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
  75. Data Destruction with Patrick Norton by ghobbsus · · Score: 1

    There was a two-part segment on the Screen Savers with Patrick Norton and Kevin Rose covering methods of data destruction, including software, grinding, acid, thermite...

    Watch it here

  76. am I missing something here? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I can't tell if you are joking or being serious.

    If you are being serious, I doubt this technique works the same way brand-to-brand. In any case, if you aren't joking, a real example like "with model X hard disk, jumper these pins together and restart and the data will be rendered inaccessible and the data [will|will not] be overwritten [with 0's, 1's, pattern, random data]" would be helpful.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:am I missing something here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means that the electronics will get fried. The drive itself would still have the data on it though.

  77. torch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I torch mine at work with an oxy-acetylene cutter. A quick trip to the facilities shop and I return with a pile of molten aluminum.

  78. Re:Two Ways Did you look at the cost & specs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It rents for $1400/mo. You could buy 10-20 hard disks/month for what this costs.

    320 pounds

    18 amps @ 220V

  79. these are my hard drive wiping utilities by Indy1 · · Score: 1
    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  80. DBAN by EchoMirage · · Score: 0, Redundant

    As about 50 other people have said, DBAN, Darik's Boot and Nuke. It far exceeds HIPAA Security Rule guidelines for secure deletion of media containing ePHI. It's about as close to a truly secure disk wiping system as you can get.

  81. How about Pointsec? by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

    Why not use software that encrypts everything written to the HDD? I'm no security expert, but you could probably rest easier when retiring/returning HDDs if you're using Pointsec. All of the laptops where I work have Pointsec on them so that if they are lost or stolen, the data on them is probably safe.

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
  82. What about wipe and set an ATA password? by thule · · Score: 1

    From the comments of this slashdot.org story it seems setting an ATA password after wiping the disk would help head off a person trying to read the data. It would raise the bar pretty high. A person would need fancy equipment to get back into the drive.

    According to the article, resetting the password wipes the drive automatically via the drive's firmware.

  83. dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/?d? by cvdwl · · Score: 1
    Hook it up to an external USB plug or internal ide bus; then, in Linux or from a KNOPPIX disk, figure out where it's located in /dev and:

    dd if=/dev/urandom bs=XXX of=/dev/yourdisk count=YYY
    Repeat seven times, which seems to be some sort of DOD magic number.

    You can play around with block size "bs=" and number of blocks "count=", but my experience was that just choosing something big but smaller than the cache size of the disk is good. Checking "man dd" might be a good.

    It takes a while. An old Dell laptop with a 40GB drive took several days. /dev/random is slow, use /dev/urandom, unless the drive contains the secrets of the Illuminati and you're afraid the NSA is after you. In which case speed might be of the essence.

    --
    ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
  84. csc duplicator by krismon · · Score: 1

    we have a csc duplicator that we use to erase and copy drives.. VERY slow.. but it does the job. CSC Portable Pro Drive Service/Test/Duplication Workstation

  85. The only sure way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a simple three-step process to nuke failed drives beyond any hope of recovery by anyone, including the NSA.

    1. Open the drive case. (I use a .44 Magnum)

    2. Pile a couple pounds of thermite in and around the drive, enough to cover all drive components.

    3. Ignite thermite. (Did an earlier poster mention the Curie point?)

    The result is a molten mass of metal. When it cools, you can toss the mass into any insecure dumpster.

  86. There's only one way... by Delphix · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows the only way to truly destroy the precious data on your old hard drive is to throw it in to the fires of Mount Doom where it was forged and watch that sucker melt.

  87. Just a little magnet will do.... by StimpyPimp · · Score: 1

    You know, those ones used to pick up cars.

    --
    This signature is part of a balanced post.
    1. Re:Just a little magnet will do.... by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1

      Not even that, one of those rare-earth neodymium magnets will do. I fail to see how giving the HDD once over with these will still yield recoverable data. Those who doubt this obviously hadn't had their fingers bruised by them before. Still fun to play with, just keep them then hell away from your PC.

    2. Re:Just a little magnet will do.... by enosys · · Score: 1

      That would definitely work if you actually rubbed it on the platters. However, you might not be able to get it close enough to the platters of a fully assembled drive.

  88. Leaf shredder by klubar · · Score: 1

    I start out thinking it would be easy to to a google search for a electric disk grater... something at would shred the disk so you could just end up with bits of metal. I'm sure they exist... but then I thought, you could probably just rent one of those truck-mounted tree chippers and chuck your disk drives into it. (There is probably a pun here about b-trees and leaf nodes.) A bit of overkill, but a lot of fun. Actually, the chances of collecting on an RMA, and it being worth the time and effort to file one are so small, you should just buy a dedicated disk shredder if you have a lot of them. Alternatively, store them until you've accumulated enough and have one of the mobile data grating services come and shred them along with the paper that needs to be destroyed. See http://www.shred-tech.com/mds/html/ among others.

  89. Bad block management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your drive does bad block management, I don't think there is a way to destroy all the data. Any blocks marked as bad still have data, but are unreadable, since any attempt to read or write them will get a spare block instead.

  90. No RMAs are the cost of doing business by metoc · · Score: 4, Informative

    The general rule of thumb for data security sensitive industries is to never return the platters.

    Most governments have arrangements to either get a discount up front, or to get the manufacturer to accept the top cover as proof the drive is destroyed, and then provide a warranty replacement.

    For everyone else it is the cost of doing business. Depending on your business the risk is measured in years in court, 7+ digit claims and real impacts on stock price. Replacing failed harddrives out of pocket is cheap.

    Best thing to do is remove the platters and store them as they take up less space, and once you have enough pay a degauss service to blast the entire box. Even then, get an artist to turn them into a piece of art for your front lobby.

    1. Re:No RMAs are the cost of doing business by djtack · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work for a university, and I have been able to get warranty replacements from Western Digital by faxing them a letter on company letterhead, explaining the reasons why we can't return the drive, and attaching a picture of the drive's top plate.

      We then let the geeks have fun destroying the disks. ;) But the parent is absolutely right. If you can't get replacements this way, you'll just have to deal with the cost of replacing them yourself.

  91. mod parent informative "5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the most succinct answer to this person's question, assuming hardware destruction has already been rejected.

  92. Oh puh-lease... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

    If it's dead, it is DEAD. No plugging it into a box to write zeros and ones.

    Your BEST bet is to eat the cost of the drives, and then degauss and then melt/feed to industrial grinder the remains.

    Maybe you can cut some kind of deal with the bendor to just return the PCB top part, or maybe part of the drive case, but most likely they will laugh at you for trying to waste their time.

  93. forget the usb-ide thing by tota · · Score: 1
    they work, generally, but I wouldn't trust them for this kind of job.

    they need external power source and in my experience they tend to be a lot more picky when handling deffective drives (which is what your RMAed drives are, right?).


    Just a plain old ide card/mb with a removable caddy tray will do just fine.

    --
    TODO: 753) write sig.
  94. secure wipes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont know bout you people but to be honest with you 1-0-1-0 wipes are not the best way to do it
    there is nothing stopping you use any other chars you want the best way to obsfucate your data is to use random chars from where ever that way if they do decide to try recover your hard disk they dont know what to disregard(this is due to residual paritcles of magnetics on the hard disk they can still retrive little bits and just filter the 1-0's out and woo they get chunks of ur data).

  95. Still Risky Indeed by Nik13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the drive is faulty, you just might not be able to overwrite the info (not reliably anyways).

    I'm surprised he's even looking for this. I work in a place where for similar regulations we have to wipe HDs securely before disposal, but that's only for working ones. Damaged HDs cannot be sent back because of the info on them, they have to be destroyed locally. We take the platters out, but I'm not 100% sure how they get destroyed (probably degaussed then physically damaged). The companies we buy PCs from are aware of this too. If a drive dies in one of the PCs that's still under warranty, they replace it and we keep the old drive for proper disposal.

    Such a device would only be useful for disposing of old PCs with functionnal HDs in them. I can't see the regulations let them do this.

    --
    ///<sig />
    1. Re:Still Risky Indeed by da007 · · Score: 3, Informative


      Army spec is 5 holes equadistant holes drilled through the platters.

    2. Re:Still Risky Indeed by binarybum · · Score: 1

      what diameter? this sounds like it would still leave much of the data intact.

      --
      ôó
    3. Re:Still Risky Indeed by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Drilled? Couldn't we just paint them black and use them as targets on the 100yd range until enough data is removed?

    4. Re:Still Risky Indeed by da007 · · Score: 1

      I can't seem find the whitepaper on the web. I'll look when I get to work tomorrow. I may just be losing my mind.

    5. Re:Still Risky Indeed by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      a blow torch is acceptable, too...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    6. Re:Still Risky Indeed by binarybum · · Score: 2, Funny

      I may just be losing my mind.

      uh-oh Were you in the military? If so, get cranial CT-scan, check for five equidistant holes. =)

      --
      ôó
    7. Re:Still Risky Indeed by hazem · · Score: 1

      Way back when we were decomissioning a system that had the big 8" drives, we had to dissassemble the drives and apply a belt sander to the platters.

      The cool part was that we got to keep the magnesium cases - which we took to a local metal recycler for a couple hundred $$. Great fun-money!

      Who knows if it was "to-spec"... but it was thorough enough for the old Top Secret data that was on them.

    8. Re:Still Risky Indeed by adamh · · Score: 1

      Yeah - that "old" top secret data is much easier to wipe than the new stuff.

    9. Re:Still Risky Indeed by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      They just don't make top secret data the way they used to...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    10. Re:Still Risky Indeed by pizero · · Score: 1

      Many years ago we had to pull out the platters, degauss them and cut them up with an acetylene torch. That was when the platters were metal. Now the platters are glass and you can just crush them to powder.

    11. Re:Still Risky Indeed by Chazman · · Score: 1
      Damaged HDs cannot be sent back because of the info on them, they have to be destroyed locally. We take the platters out, but I'm not 100% sure how they get destroyed (probably degaussed then physically damaged).

      Bingo (except don't bother with the degaussing). That's the ONLY solution I would advocate. As for destroying the platters, I recommend a high-speed belt sander, and some really rough coarse-grit sanding belts. Hold the platter with a bench vise and apply belt sander liberally. Flip the platter over; repeat. Stop when there's not a square micrometer of platter surface left that's either smooth or shiny.

      --
      -----Chaz
  96. I've had good luck with... by theAtomicFireball · · Score: 1

    ... a sledgehammer.

    I've yet to hear of anyone recovering data after a good 5 whack "scrubbing".

  97. Mandatory Aliens Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say we dust off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    Aliens was the best of the series, despite Winona.

    1. Re:Mandatory Aliens Reference by pwnage · · Score: 0, Troll

      Uh, Aliens didn't have Winona, Aliens Resurrection had Winona. ...and anyway, she's hot.

      --
      Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
    2. Re:Mandatory Aliens Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the GP meant that even though the "hot" WR enhnaced the viewability of AR, As was still better.

  98. True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I worked as a consultant at the local police headquarters and it was policy to shred the entire drive case and all. That was until the shredding company said they would only shred the platters as it was too hard on their equipment - so the technicians had to take apart the drives before shredding the platters.

    Actually they also shreded all PDA's and anything else that could hold information. I almost cried when they shredded a 3 month old Palm Tungsten that was flakey even though it could have been RMA'ed but it was against security policy to send it out. Clearing the flash was not considered secure enough.

  99. Secure Deletion of Data. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Put between two 12" Rockford Fosgate Punch subs, hook up subs to 1600 watt Phoenix Gold amp, crank the rap/techno/rock/country music for about twenty minutes Make sure magnets on subs touch hard drive surface. No way to retrieve data.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  100. Re:An embedded PC-driven entropy rewriter/degausse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That actually sounds like a very neat idea. Pictures? Tips from an expert?

  101. DOD regs at a USFHP facility by Mumpsman · · Score: 1

    I worked at a US Family Health Plan facility (like an HMO for veterans - one step below a VA hospital), and our contract with the DOD specifically listed the approved methods of data destruction. There was a software solution which we were able to use to recycle the hardware to poor rural school districs, mostly though we took those machines home or trashed them.

    I would check with the DOD before you spend too much time messing around with drills or less-than-rigorous software solutions. They most likely have something in mind for the kind of information your facility handles.

    --
    No battles to the death are recalled. Mumpsman can hit to attack and cause brainsmashing.
  102. If it's really, REALLY secret by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
    If it's really, REALLY secret, you have two options: destroy the drive, or trust the manufacturer. Are hard drives really so expensive that you can't eat the occasional dud?

    Also, what do you propose to do when the electronics die? The info is still on the platters, but no software solution can touch it. You're back to those two choices again ...

  103. Big @$$ magnet? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if this would damage anything in the harddrive, but what if you bought a super strong electromagnet (~.5-1 tesla) and gave it several passes over the harddrive, wouldn't that be enough to erase the data?

  104. Re:Two Ways... WRONG! by GodBlessTexas · · Score: 1

    Writing zeros doesn't work. The way modern hard drives operate, it is never possible for the sectors on a hard disk platter to be put back into a truly neutral state by the write heads, especially if all you do is write zeros over it. The current DOD standard for sanitizing confidential and secret data, 5220.22-M, requires for a sector to overwritten seven times with an alternating pattern to hopefully render the recovery of data from the sector impossible. However the DOD, as of 2003, suspended the use of this practice because a GAO audit determined that the inability to control the flow of top secret data combined with problems with the accepted algorithm caused top secret data to be recovered from hard drives removed from non-classified systems. The ruling came down that all hard drives from deprecated systems had to be physically destroyed in the interim until another solution was discovered.

    --
    Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
  105. Ways to do this by Dravik · · Score: 1

    Assuming the drives function a good way to do this is to add a removable drive carrier for each device type SCSI IDE etc.. that you need to erase into a computer with wiping software installed. Just drop the drive into the carrier, insert into computer, Scan for hardware changes, wipe drive. Data Express make some really good ones. I currenly use this type of setup in a disaster recovery server to backup drives that are not connected to the network for various reasons.

    --
    The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  106. Use a mangle ... by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    It's what we do with dead drives, it's not quite a mangle really .. more an industrial strength shredder.

  107. Disk Jockey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ars Technica reviewed the Disk Jockey a while ago. You can plug in drives to copy, wipe, or compare them. Use alone or connect to your computer via USB or Firewire.

    http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/diskjockey .ars
    http://www.diskology.com/products.html

  108. Too Late on RMA... by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

    If the drive needs service, it's probably too late.

    The data has to be written to the drive encrypted, look into AES-256 on Linux (possibly with tweak).

    Some hardware assist may help to get you going: my company makes a data assurance solution (plug).

    In any case, with an encrypted solution: The data keys are revoked, and Bob's your Uncle - the data is gone. You need to secure your key repository.

    If the drive needs service, writes may fail, so any "pre-service" solution won't be secure.

    So, bring out the sledge, and whack that thing!

    Ratboy

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  109. Darik and enclosure by DRobson · · Score: 1

    How about using a vanilla PC with a removable HDD bay. Grab a copy of Darik's boot and nuke from here. Set a few options on the boot disk and get it to run automatically when booted, set floppy as boot device. Now you can just whack in any HDD through the enclosure, power on, and it'll nuke itself automatically. Advantage of using lesser and more common hardware.

  110. A missile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew a guy who worked for the Hubble Space Telescope Institute. He had a Silicon Graphics Onyx computer on his desk that he got from the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland.

    Turns out one day the soldiers at the base were ordered to destroy a number of these machines because they were told they had classified information on them.

    So they dragged them out to the firing range and fired missiles at them - except for the one the graphic artist got - he convinced the soldier in charge to just remove the hard drive and destroy that with the other computers. He also recommended that they might want to destroy just the hard drives - they didn't go for that - and they blew away some expensive computers.

  111. Other Two Word Answers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Milling machine.

    Active volcano.

    Blow torch.

    Hydrolic press.

    Acid bath.

  112. Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fire. It'll be pretty, too.

  113. One word. by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

    Thermite.

  114. Industrial Schredder would work by c170 · · Score: 1

    This industrial shredder can shred couches, refridgerators, or computers. It could probably erase your hard drive!

  115. Re:Mod Parent Down... Plagarising (Karma Whore) by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

    It's not *plagiarizing if you cite where it came from, arse.

    --
    -gjr
  116. Uh, no by Erwos · · Score: 1

    "No case-opening is necessary to use a USB/IDE converter, which might be a good middle ground. Any other ideas?"

    Nearly all USB (and Firewire) mass storage devices won't allow you to do a number of things, including check your SMART info on the drive. It is probably not the tool I would use for this kind of operation, which could involve some very low-level IDE operations.

    Slightly OT, but I recently had a hard drive go bad in a USB enclosure - it was maddening to not have any way to know of this beforehand, and actually somewhat of a pain to diagnose (is it the hard drive, the enclosure, or some cable?). I've sworn off ideas of serious USB or Firewire RAID because of this very problem.

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  117. A shredder by borwells · · Score: 1

    I'm not joking. One of my company's large clients refuses to send their drives off because of litigation they have been through before. They require us to totally destroy the drives before recycling any computers. We use a large shredder which turns the hard drive to dust within a few seconds.

    We went through the routine of trying to get them to use an NSA approved wipe utility, or multiple formats and 1 byte garbage writes, but they weren't convinenced. Considering how many problems they've had in court before because old documents past their retention age have shown up I can't say I blame them.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
    1. Re:A shredder by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

      Considering how many problems they've had in court before because old documents past their retention age have shown up I can't say I blame them.

      Were they Microsoft?

      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
  118. I'll build you one by arete · · Score: 1

    I'll build you one. Seriously.
    You make a list of all the drive interfaces you want, and I'll put together a system or systems (depending on how many) that automatically overwrite all data on them to match DoD 2250 on any boot.

    Obviously this won't be able to overwrite data where the heads have failed, but it'll make a good attempt to blow away whatever is possible without hardware intervention.

    As noted in another reply, the real answer is to change your RMA contract so you only have to return the covers.

    Email me if you're actually interested in this.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  119. Hidden sectors by jmv · · Score: 1

    I think if the data is really sensitive, then there no way any deletion program would work. The reason is that sometimes the drive can detect bad sectors before they fail completely and copy it to a previously "hidden" sector. At this point, there no way you can access data on the "bad sector" to delete it.

    1. Re:Hidden sectors by kybred · · Score: 1
      I'd mod you up if I had points. The only way to make drive totally unrecoverable is to 'slag' it (turn it into molten slag).

      pk

  120. This guy is correct... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 2, Informative

    I deal with this all the time. There are a few methods that have been approved. You can format with a writting a complete random 0's, 1's across the entire disk 3 times (this includes the protected area where the MBR sits and is hidden from normal usage). Or you can destroy the disk completely. Typically destruction of the disk entails dismantaling the enclosure, removing the platters and then emmersion in a acid or burning in furnace to melt the platters. Hammers are not recommended as the broken pieces can still contain data which given enough resources can be extracted.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:This guy is correct... by cjmnews · · Score: 1

      The 3 pass algorithm is ok for some applications. If I remember correctly it is approved for information below Secret level in the DoD.
      A co-worker of mine sent me a link to a white paper that details a 35 pass algorithm http://wipe.sourceforge.net/secure_del.html that mathematically ensures erasure all information on (1,7) RLL, MFM, and (2,7) RLL formats.
      Since you stated in your original query that the disk is dead, I am not sure that you will be able to apply any algorithm.
      Since you mention that this would be done for RMA material, I would suggest changing the terms of your contract with your supplier. Your contract should be modified such that you get a new drive and return the case of the defective drive (no platters) to the supplier of the hard drives. If your information is sensitive enough to warrant wiping, the supplier shouldn't even get the chance to get at your information. If the white paper is to be believed, you should probably remove the cache memory from the hard drive before returning it for RMA as well.
      For actual software that does this, search http://sourceforge.net/ there was at least one hit there (Erasure?) but it may not meet your needs.
      I hope this answers all of your questions.

      --
      You can lose something that is loose, so tighten the loose item so you don't lose it.
  121. a minute or two on high will delete your house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FIRE!

  122. My approach to HDD death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, after my new laptop's HDD "died" due to a firmware issue and I had installed the cross-ship replacement, I took care of the old HDD by opening the case and pouring in a mixture of the following on the platters and spindle:
    • olive oil
    • fine sand
    • cigarette ash
    The HDD mechanism was still functional, and since there was no physical defect I decided to ensure they I got my warranty's worth on the RMA.

    Not a secure delete by any stretch of the imagination, but I feel fairly confident that the drive ended up in a discard pile instead of in another laptop as a "reconditioned" part.

    Vindictive? Probably, but I also felt that their QA team was to blame for the failure in the first place. They inconvenienced me, so I (in some small way) tried to return the favor.

  123. A small forge and a propane tank by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Just like the said in Aliens "Nuke the site from orbit, it is the only way to be sure". Buy/Build a forge and then take the old platters our and burn em up (don't put a whole sealed harddrive in, it might asplode).

  124. Long time ago... by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    Any other ideas?

    Disassembly the drive with proper tool. Use the acetylene cutter on magnetic plates to burn surface. I have witnessed this procedure on damaged (heads drop) mainframe disks with secret data several decades ago. You even need no electricity, for which may come handy if your shop is currently... under siege.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  125. Summary of the above. by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

    1) Locate a bitch box (faster is better for randomizing writes).
    2) Locate enough HBAs, adapters cables et cetera do be able to do a good batch of drives at a time.
    3) Get a DBAN cd, floppy or USB drive.
    4) Wipe it.
    5) If you have any reason to think the drive is bad (slow erasure, clicking noises et cetera), DEGAUSS it.
    6) LABEL ALL DRIVES PROPERLY. Note who wiped it, with what setting, how many passes et cetera.

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  126. What I use... by apharov · · Score: 1

    I would recommend trying Eraser, which is free, easy to use and seems quite credible.

    With it you can erase everything on a disk or just unused space or selected files with selectable number of patterned overwrites (not just 1 or 0). Supports the elsewhere-mentioned "Darik's boot and Nuke method". Integrates very nicely and non-obtrusively into MS operating systems.

    With the risk of sounding like a fanboy: Recommended :)

  127. Data destruction != RMA by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    Here's the blunt facts. If you need to destroy the data completely, you can't give reasonably intact platters back to a company for RMA. Period.

    However, let's look into this. If your disk is one in a RAID5 or stripeset, then collecting the data off of it intact is only going to be moderately useful at best. How much can someone do with every seventh (or so) block of data?

    If you're doing truly sensitive stuff (healthcare, military, etc.) then I don't see any alternative but destruction. If you're dealing with 'typical' corporate security, a narrow-stripe RAID5 (or 0) and a decent wipe utility should be sufficient.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  128. Degausser by ka9dgx · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you want the data gone, but can't physically destroy the patters, you'll need more than the tape demagnetizer from Radio Shack to degauss it. You need a DC magnetic field, a damned strong one. The field at the surface of the disk platters must be at least 3000 Oersted (0.3 Tesla).

    The drive housing may, in fact, shunt the field around the drive if it is ferromagnetic. (See if a magnet sticks to it)

    If it were me, I'd make a nonmagnetic aluminum housing to screw the drive onto, pad the hell out of it (just incase I slipped), and head on over to Radiology, and use a 10 Tesla (or stronger) MRI to erase that bad boy. I'd rotate it in all 3 dimensions, more than once, just to make sure.

    If the field you use demagnetizes to the servo and drive magnets, it'll probably be safe to return for replacement.

    I agree that it's probably better to eat the cost of the drives than to risk the getting made the poster child for HIPAA. (You just know they'll looking for someone pull a Martha Stewart on.)

    --Mike--

    1. Re:Degausser by Bad_Feeling · · Score: 1

      DC isn't as affective at degaussing as AC. For example, all monitor degaussers work at AC. So does the erase head on tape decks, it is typically connected to a 400khz oscillater. The reason is, for something to be magnetized, it has to be exposed to a changing magnetic field.

      --
      Disclaimer: On the other hand, I am kind of a psycho...
  129. Blancco DriveWipe Custom Solution by michaelaiello · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have done a few of these setups. Essentially we set up a rack at your location that has several slots for ide or scsi drives, you plug the disk in and it wipes it and reports the serial number of the disk as wiped. You can also have a barcode sticker on the hard drives and scan it with a barcode reader(optional) during erasure. Check out our site. And tell em Mike sent ya ;) http://www.blancco.us

  130. Safest method to prevent access to the drive... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    is to destroy it with something VERY VERY heavy, oh, I suppose, a multi-tonne press of some kind. And if you have access to a multi-tonne press, I personally would sandwich it along the plane of the platter. That way you have a better chance of physically distorting the platter, let's say, into a "V", "S", or "W" shape. After that, toss the remains into a chemical bath capable of solvating Iron, Aluminum, and Copper. Your choice of strong acids might include 12.1 Normal hydrochloric acid, 36 Normal sulfuric acid, and possibly chromic acid. Another technique used for solvating iron, and this method is very dangerous, so kids, don't try this at home, I mean it, is to take concentrated nitric acid and 30 percent hydrogen peroxide and slowly, I mean slowly, pour the 30 percent hydrogen peroxide into the concentrated nitric acid. WARNING: The fumes from this concoction will cause severe damage to the respiratory track, skin, eyes, and any part of your body left exposed. THIS CAN BE EXPLOSIVE WHEN MIXED TOO QUICKLY: IT BOILS AND SPATTERS AND ENTERS THE GASEOUS PHASE RATHER QUICKLY. Common laboratory gloves (latex and blue nitrile), even triple gloving, will not protect your skin. This chemical concoction literally breaks down all organic material and dissolves iron, iron oxides, and many other metals etc... To safely work with this chemical you need commercial industrial strength black rubber gloves, appropriate goggles, face shield, and environment suite.

    This is serious stuff and is not appropriate for practical jokes, and will cause serious injury when used inappropriately. In short, we all saw what water did to the Wicked Witch of the West in The Wizard of Oz, well this stuff will do exactly that to human and animal flesh.

    Given my experience using concentrated nitric acid and 30 percent hydrogen peroxide for cleaning glasware in graduate school, this should be sufficient for destroying just about anything.

    Cheers!

    1. Re:Safest method to prevent access to the drive... by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

      they let you RMA the drive after that?

      --
      Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    2. Re:Safest method to prevent access to the drive... by tres3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I took Organic chemistry too. The average person cannot get Nitric acid (HNO3) as it is the primary component in explosives like trinitrotoluene (TNT) and the strongest hydrogenperoxide (H2O2) that you can get is 3% from the pharmacy because it too can be used for nefarious things at concentrations over 30% like mixing it with rubber to make a hypergolic rocket fuel. If you read the poster's question and you are really trying to provide a solution then I have to ask how you intend to RMA a jar of liquid that is so nasty that it cannot be mailed through USPS, UPS or FedEx. Although I would like to see the look on the faces of the techs that receive it! :-)

  131. For old time's sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever happened to "pistols at twenty paces"?

  132. Secure Hard Drive Deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If a drive is dead, there is no way you're going to be able to reliably delete / erase / overwrite data on the platter.

    If standards require that confidential data be protected, then you won't be able to return such a drive for RMA. The only option to protecting the data is to destroy the drive. You might be able to work out a deal with an understanding vendor such that you return an identifiable piece of the drive, and they will provide a replacement drive. However, drives are cheap, and finding such a vendor may not be easy. An alternative would be to insure the drives against failure for a limited time.

    Destroying the drive: Consider removing the platter(s) and applying them to a grinder (most grinders have wire brush wheels). Follow with an acid bath.

  133. Encrypt your disks to start with. by cgenman · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of ways to encrypt a disk, either using disk virtualization or on an OS level. This ensures that your data is useless to pretty much anyone short of the NSA. If someone swipes a disk from the lab and wants to take a "peek," or finds a laptop your contractor accidentally left in the park, you're safe. The performance hit these days on desktops is negligable and on servers seems acceptable. And good luck decrypting a disk that's been degaussed or otherwise had data overwrites / losses.

    Encrypting disks these days is pretty painless and automatic, and ensures one more way that your private data is going to stay private. Highly recommended.

  134. Can someone explain to me.. by HungSoLow · · Score: 1

    Why can't you simply write nothing but 1's (or 0's) to every bit of the hard drive? If anyone could give an explanation, that'd be great!

    1. Re:Can someone explain to me.. by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

      Without getting technical, think of it as writing 'HELLO WORLD' on a piece of paper, then scribbling all over it (with equal pressure on the pen). If you really, really try, you can see the original message. The same thing happens with the magnetics inside the hard drive platter, some are more receptive than others, noting was was recently written to them in the past. Some agencies/people/organizations have claimed that hard drives can be recovered 8 or 10 times back.

      It gets costly though.

      --
      Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    2. Re:Can someone explain to me.. by Detritus · · Score: 1
      The best analogy that I can think of is a pencil and paper. The pencil is the recording head and the paper is the platter. The pencil has a mediocre eraser. Every time you record new information on the sheet of paper, you erase any previous writing, but you do a half-assed job of it. If you look closely, you can see previous characters that were written on the page and then erased.

      With the right equipment, you can do something similar with magnetic media.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Can someone explain to me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lots of people say they can recover it after a several passes, but no one has ever been able to actually do it. Ever.

      "one overwrite pass is enough to stop anyone recovering your data. If anyone tells you otherwise, tell them to put up or shut up"

      Here's what that's from...

      From these descriptions you should be able to see that if only a high-level format has been performed (either quick or full) then your data has remained untouched.
      Now, there are some people out there who claim that data can be recovered even from a mid-level format.
      A popular paper on this topic is written by Gutmann, and can be found here:
      http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/ secure_ del.html

      This document has been examined and a rather good rebuttal on it can be found here:
      http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/overwritten-d ata-gut tman.html
      I am of the opinion that the arguments put forward by the gentleman in the rebuttal document are accurate. I have yet to locate anyone on the planet who is capable of recovering useful data that has been overwritten. Having said that, there are a number of people in the field who have successfully recovered overwritten data under certain limiting conditions.
      Firstly, the person has to know the nature of the data to begin with. I must admit that I'm not certain as to what extent this familiarity must be, but it sounds to me like you must know what the data is in order to make a determination on what it should be when recovered.
      Secondly, the process is very slow - of the order of around 1 kilobyte per hour. Work out how long that would take for you to recover all your mp3 files off a 120GB drive.
      Finally, this process is only capable of being performed on low-density drives, such as the MFM encoded drives mentioned earlier.
      These issues mean that the recovery of overwritten data is impossible in the real world.

      Now some of you are asking "if you can't recover data that has been overwritten just once, why do companies sell software that does multiple overwrites?"
      I have an opinion on this, but I can't back it up with any facts. Here it is anyway:
      Company A brings out DataDeathstar, a program that will eradicate your rebel files by overwriting them once. This is all you need.
      Company B makes a similar product, perhaps without such a copyright-infringing name, but in order to sound better than Company A, they claim they can do multi-pass overwrites. Perhaps they back this decision up with the Gutmann article mentioned earlier.
      Now if the cost is the same, Joe User will choose the program with more features - the version that does multi-pass overwrites.
      This then precipitates an escalation in the number of wipes any package will perform, to make them sound better than their competitors. Eventually we end up with the Department of Defense 35-pass "standard", or the Bilbo-level Eleventy-billion Insano-wipe.

      So why does the Department of Defense specify that huge multi-pass overwrite if one is enough? Once again I can only theorise, as I don't know anyone in that industry who could speak about this topic. Here goes:
      Decisions are made by people far above the technical guys on the ground. That is, management types with no techie knowhow. I'm not berating this issue, as it is the same the world over.
      At the weekly meeting, one of the subordinate guys points out he read a report from Gutmann about recovering data. It may have mentioned the MFM-issue but that's all techie-speak. The boss decides that he'd rather not risk his career on an issue he can't understand and doesn't have the resources to examine in any depth.
      To be safe, he makes sure the standard is some huge amount of overkill, so he can never be determined to be a traitor by allowing data to get into the wrong hands.
      This all seems fairly reasonable to me - everyone errs on the side of caution in a field they don't understand.
      Also, the military has had loads of data on old MFM tech

  135. The obvious answer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EMP the sucker.
    For how to build one, just look for instructions on how to build a coil gun and dry-fire it. Although, do this away from other electronics that you don't want securely deleted.

  136. I know just the machine for this job. by sakusha · · Score: 1

    There is a machine that is purpose-built for this job: the SSI Quad.

  137. Horror story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once purchased a 'brand new' drive from a local supplier, and upon installing it found the complete patient records of a local psychiatric clinic.

    I called the supplier's MD immediately demanding answers before 'dd'ing the disk. This could have instantly destroyed not only the patients reputations but the suppliers business. Seeing how serious the supplier took the matter, knowing how ethical and honest they'd been in all my other dealings and knowing that neither myself (or likely anyone else) had seen the data, I choose not to pursue it.

    Apparently, someone had mixed up drives during a machine service/upgrade.

    Be VERY VERY careful - an accident like this could destroy people's lives.

  138. don't think so, he said 'remove and reformat' by davidwr · · Score: 1

    He said remove the jumpers and reformat.

    If the electronics were fried, you couldn't do that.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  139. ICS by lythander · · Score: 1

    ICS DiskMASSter devices are for imaging drives for forensic capture, and they have DOD-compliant wipe routines. They're quite configurable. I have used the IDE one (1 master and 8 target devices, can wipe all nine at once, IDE plus SATA adapters), and the SCSI one (worked with everything SCSI (50 pin, 68 pin, SCA) except a few disks from a Sun Enterprise 1000, but the little bird inside may have died of old age in them.

    http://www.ics-iq.com/

  140. Old HDD with weird little symbol ... by zulunappy · · Score: 1

    I have an old scsi drive with a little A-10 symbol on the board and a mil spec type number on it and rubber shock mounts on the corners. I always wondered how the heck it ended up at the bottom of the world down here. Maybe it fell from a passing plane....

  141. Hardware Tool by pat_trick · · Score: 1

    We used one of these at the last place I worked. Plug the drive into the unit using an external swappable bay, and you're set. Does 7 pass DoD standard wipes, and is hella fast in doing them.

    Also great for doing direct data copies of an exsisting drive for backup.

  142. obligatory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the right case, a solid state drive,
    some SCSI cards and one of various pieces of software, I can imagine such a beast.


    But can you imagine a beowulf cluster of... ahh nevermind.

  143. given your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we to understand that you saw some *really* bad porn, and wanted to be sure it was gone?

  144. 20 grit sandpaper works wonders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, if you're planning on reusing the drive it's not really a great option.

  145. Depends on how much disclose will cost you.. by drfreak · · Score: 1

    Especially under HIPAA, we are talking thousands of dollars *per* violation. To simply write zeroes or random bits to each sector is not good enough. Melt that thing into slag or destroy it in acid, then pick randomly from the leftover bits and dispose of them in separate physical locations.

  146. external hard drive case by Stibidor · · Score: 1

    Run a Google search for "external hard drive case" and buy MediaWiper. Piece of cake.

  147. I saw just the thing at the RSA conference... by DangerTenor · · Score: 1

    There was a company advertising information destruction services. They had degaussing devices, and an even better option. Tom's Hardware did a story on the RSA conference and took some pictures, which you can see here: http://www.tomshardware.com/business/20050219/rsa_ conference-06.html#sem_destruction_guaranteed. If anything can do what you want, I'm guessing the hard drive shredder that they offer is just the thing.

    --
    Check out our infosecurity industry blog: http://securitymusings.com/
  148. Premptive Obfuscation by CyberSp00k · · Score: 1

    What you need to do is to never store plaintext data on the hard drive in the first place. I believe Asus makes a system case with built-in encryption and a company in Norway, High Density Devices ( http://www.hdd.no/ ), builds an after-market device that sits between the mainboard IDE controller and the drive. Keying material is physically and logically NEVER part of the CPU or main memory. The advantage to both of these is that the encryption is spindle-to-rim; even the MBR is encrypted. 256-bit AES is good enough for the U.S. military right now - the CNO has even allowed it for classified data.

    With these solutions, when the drive crashes, just send it to the recycler - no keying material means that the drive contents are digital kibble.

    --
    Spiritus ex Machina
    "The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it's stranger than we CAN imagine."
    1. Re:Premptive Obfuscation by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Question: how does it do the IV?

      I've looked at their cert, it doesn't say much. All that shows is their module is doing AES.

      But, if it always encrypts each block with the same key and the same IV you're kinda screwed.

      --
  149. Fire Bomb (aka exploding drives) by burning_plastic · · Score: 1

    I'm going to try something out when I get home.

    Open up the air hole on an old drive, and use a can of butane lighter fluid to fill the inside with a nice gas/air mix.

    A bit of tape over the hole should seal it up so that I can get far enough away to light it. I think I might even try the trail of gasoline method of lighting as it only has to be hot enough to melt the tape.

    We used to do this with old monitors (drill the face and pour gas in) but this sounds like fun...

    Should wreck the platters and make a nice bang in the process. A brick wall to hide behind is always nice.

    I'll post the pics when I get back to my supply of old drives ;->

    ------

    All Your Fish Are Belong To Us

  150. Multiple options. by bryanp · · Score: 1

    You could take them to a company that has an industrial shredder. The kind that shreds metal, not just paper.

    Or you could do what I did for the longest time - stack old drives up in a cardboard box in the corner of the vault.

    Failing space for that, disassemble the drive down to just the bare platters. You can toss everything except the platters. A box in the vault (or wherever) will hold an awful lot of those platters. The magnets you'll recover are fun, too.

    Finally, take the platters to the firing range. Mount them on targets. Have a relaxing afternoon. I know I did.

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    1. Re:Multiple options. by Megane · · Score: 1
      Failing space for that, disassemble the drive down to just the bare platters.

      If you have the time, and you like taking things apart, this can be really fun. Just get yourself a set of T-5 thru T-10 Torx bits and have at it.

      The real fun part is getting the magnets off of the metal mounts that they're glued to. I like to repeatedly drop them onto concrete from six feet up until the magnet cracks off. They make great fridge magnets. The platters and spacer rings make nice shiny toys, too.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  151. Re:An embedded PC-driven entropy rewriter/degausse by CyberSp00k · · Score: 2

    "...entropy data generated from an onboard Random Event Generator. "

    Like a cup of really hot tea?

    --
    Spiritus ex Machina
    "The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it's stranger than we CAN imagine."
  152. secure hard drive destruction by cahiha · · Score: 1

    Use one of these. No, you don't have to open the case, although you may need to work a little harder if you don't.

    More seriously, you can use one of these.

  153. Encryption by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    A more elegant solution is to encrypt your data to begin with.
    After the upfront cost/time of putting in the encryption solution, replacing and discarding drives incurs zero overhead. An encrypted drive is useless to anyone who does not have the encryption key.
    Encryption also provides ongoing protection for the drives during use and for backups.
    You can start your look here.

  154. DoD 2250? by dfelznic · · Score: 1

    Where can I find info on DoD 2250?

    1. Re:DoD 2250? by CyberSp00k · · Score: 1

      Have you checked Standards.gov ( http://standards.gov/standards_gov/index.cfm )?

      BTW: DoD 2250 isn't enough info. There are standards, regulations, publications, et cetera ad nauseum. There are also MIL, Army, AF, Navy, JCS, and TLA (three-letter agency) documents in heaps. The GPO goes through several deciduous forests every year, just printing indexes to the govt pubs.

      Good luck in your search.

      --
      Spiritus ex Machina
      "The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it's stranger than we CAN imagine."
  155. feasible and %100 effective solution by mathmathrevolution · · Score: 1

    Put the harddrives in a kilm. Boil off the magnetic media. Once the media has evaporated nobody will ever be able to recover the data. Watch out for toxic fumes.

  156. VIDEO - Destroying Drives with Acid and Thermite by ghobbsus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a two-part segment on the Screen Savers with Patrick Norton and Kevin Rose covering methods of data destruction, including software, grinding, acid, thermite...

    Watch it here

  157. Hard Drive meet by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    Mr. Hammer.

    Just give em to my two year old

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  158. Don't Destroy - Encrypt by dsginter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    SafeGuard Easy

    Plenty of businesses use it to encrypt a hard drive (boot time password) prior to production. This way, if the drive fails mechanically and the data can't be destroyed (without physically destroying the drive), the data is still encrypted. As a plus, there is no need to wipe a drive since you only need erase the SafeGuard Kernel which renders it just about as useless. There was a case a while back where one of the European countries tried to brute force this software for a criminal trial and could not do so.

    For HIPAA, you'll need to physically destroy a drive if it has failed mechanically and you can't otherwise wipe it.

    Don't get me wrong - this software is a pain in the ass since you have to decrypt a drive using the admin software if the underlying OS becomes unbootable. But it is a relatively simple solution, otherwise.

    --
    More
    1. Re:Don't Destroy - Encrypt by commrade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless it's a one time pad or something similar, this only secures the drive for a limited time. Many modern ciphers will not be much of a challenge 10-20 years in the future. This is true not only because of increases in computing power. Advances in cryptography will almost certainly turn up weaknesses in contemporary ciphers.

    2. Re:Don't Destroy - Encrypt by pyropunk51 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. Get something like ABIT SecureIDE and install it in every machine. Then you kill 2 birds with one stone. 1) you can be sure that only authorised personel can use the machine and 2) if the drive dies, you unplug it and you can be sure that no one can read the data on it.

      --
      double penetration; //ouch
    3. Re:Don't Destroy - Encrypt by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Given you trust ABIT to not build some kind of master key into the thing or use a weak/broken implementation of the crypto-magic.

      I, personally, would trust the linux loopback crypto more than a piece of hardware that I don't know what it really does (or doesn't).

      There are software tools similar to linux loopback-crypto for windows (I've used one called "scramdisk" long ago) but again, unless you get the src and know it's audited by someone you trust (i.e. yourself) you'll never know whether it really does what it claims.

      It ofcourse all depends on whether you just want to protect your data from the opportunity thief who lifts a box or two from your office or if you want/need to apply the maximum level of paranoia.

      Again - I, personally, would always aim for the latter because I see no reason why to go for less. Loopback crypto is free and reasonably peer-reviewed after all.

  159. Would these work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about one of the commercial devices for just such a purpose such as this
    http://www.pctestpro.com/disktest/disktest.h tm
    or this
    http://www.softwareandstuff.com/TOL10248.htm l

    AS we use the Pro Drive system at my shop I know it will do Government approved wipes.

    Hope these fit the bill.

  160. Better Support Contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some vendors offer a secure disk contract, for which you pay extra but, in return, never have to return a hard drive. It gets diagnosed bad, you get a replacement disk and you do whatever your heart desires with the defective drive.

    I suggest a large, hot fire.

    On another note, other posters are right: if your data is really that sensitive and you don't have a support contract like the one I mentioned, it's likely cheaper just to buy a new drive rather than risk millions of dollars in financial losses or the leakage of classified information.

  161. Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    With dd, the drive need not be mounted, just plugged in. So boot Knopix then:

    # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdb

    or sdb, or whatever.

    However, this is NOT secure enough for some purposes, in which case a 25lb sledge hammer will do - more fun anyway.

    When all you have is a hard disk, everything begins to look like a sledge hammer.

  162. The thermite solution by dnaboy · · Score: 1
    Best thing from that page is the video where they place 4 lbs of thermite on top of a disk drive and ignite it. 3000 degrees does wonders to a hard drive.

    The link is mid page on the right. I think it's video part 2

  163. Re:An embedded PC-driven entropy rewriter/degausse by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    This process is extensive enough to ensure that even the world's most sophisticated data recovery experts will recovery nary a bit from such a drive,
    And this has been certified by who?
  164. Where do you work? by MonsoonDawn · · Score: 1

    I'd really like to know where you work so I can make sure your employer get's their ass sued off for exposing people's private information. If you and your employer are such ignorant cheapskates that your would RMA a drive with people's personal information then neither of you should be roaming free.

  165. Drives should not have cleartext on them by ikeleib · · Score: 1

    If the security of the content on the drives is that important, they should be encrypted. Encrypting the drive almost eliminates the risk of data disclosure from theft. It's tempting to think that the organization is secure and that nobody could pull an inside job, but it's deluding yourself. Each drive should be encrypted with a DIFFERENT key. When a drive fails/is stolen, it is not a worry.

  166. maybe... by 4_Minor_Drawbacks · · Score: 0

    ...a hammer?

  167. two methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two well-known, accepted methods for doing this.

    The first is the non-destrucive method, which works well if the security of the data is merely important and not absolutely critical, and if the drive is functioning correctly. I think the easiest thing to do is keep a PC around with a Solaris x86 install, hook up the drive(s), run fdisk, and then run format and choose analyze from the menu. The analyze menu has several sub-commands which are destructive and write a series of bit patterns all over the disk. If you run format in multiple terminals (with xterm or screen or whatever), you can do as many disks at once as you desire, and you get a progress update in the form of cylinder numbers as well.

    The other method is the destructive method, which is appropriate when the data is very sensitive, or when the drive has failed and you cannot use the software method. The method is very simple. You get a mask to make sure you don't inhale tiny particles, a pair of safety glasses to protect your eyes, a pair of vise grips to hold the disk platter firmly, and a bench grinder to ensure the bits are scrambled. You probably also want a canister vacuum cleaner, and work gloves will keep stuff off your hands but probably will not protect them much at all if you get flesh near the bench grinder. In some cases, it may be best to postpone the destructive method until you have some stress to blow off (provided this doesn't make you act sloppy and careless around the bench grinder). Whether you merely remove the surface or grind the whole platter down to dust is your choice.

  168. An actual answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if this is secure enough, but....

    http://fwdepot.com/thestore/product_info.php/pro du cts_id/574

  169. Bad Sectors are Your Enemy by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you say "secure" I have to ask "how secure?"

    For example, in any situation that deals with classified data, once classified the disks can never, ever be unclassified without physical destruction. Part of the reason is that data recovery technology is VERY good, a few years ago, state of the art was the ability to recover data that had been overwritten up to 20 times.

    In a nutshell, it worked by looking at the "edges" of the data tracks, because of the minute variations in head positioning, each time the drive wrote out data, the write head was not perfectly centered so there would be enough "splash" on the sides of the track to be able to recover the information. And that was a few years ago, who knows how good the tools are today.

    Another thing to watch out for with all of these software solutions - you can only over-write what you can access. If the disk has acquired new bad sectors during its use, the controller automagically copies the data to a spare sector and then puts the bad sector on the "grown defect list." Generally, through software, you can't get to the sectors on the grown defect list - the controller has them remapped to the new sectors But, someone with the right tools can usually read those sectors well enough to extract the data from them.

    Do you care about that level of security? I don't know, but you should at least be aware of fragility of most solutions proposed here so far.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Bad Sectors are Your Enemy by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always hear this "overwritten 20 times can be recovered" claim, but it really sounds like a bunch of tinfoil myth to me.

      It may have been true in the 80s, but modern drives arent like those old stepper things where thermal expansion would lead to misaligned tracks that arent totaly overwriten, and modern drives dont have any real space between the tracks that can have any information. Today, a bit is saved in little more that is needed to be termally stable. Any remains of an old bit (even if it was the last state) would have to be at least an order of magnitude smaller (or it would cause errors). Something that small would flip simply because of kT.

      At least civilian recovery firms werent able to recover data even ONCE overwritten with zeros 2 years back in a C'T test (not even worth mentioning thats the hardest task, and they also send drives that were overwritten with random bits and some which were overwritten 5 times, no need to tell the results there).
      Just think about it: even if they pull out the platter and put it under an atomic force microscopy with a magnetic sensing tip, and really can identify a bit with 90% probability even after overwriting... if you need a byte, you are down to 50%, if you need a word, 18%.
      And 90% may be doable if its overwriten once, but if its overwritten 5 times, it isnt.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Bad Sectors are Your Enemy by hankwang · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Just think about it: even if they pull out the platter and put it under an atomic force microscopy with a magnetic sensing tip, and really can identify a bit with 90% probability even after overwriting... if you need a byte, you are down to 50%,

      Finally someone in this discussion who gets it. Apart from that, the speed of an AFM/MFM microscope would be a couple of bytes per second. Good luck recovering a 40 GB harddisk with that. Nobody has ever demonstrated a successful recovery of overwritten data.

      AFAIK, data recovery normally deals with restoring data from drives with mechanical or electronic defects. Or with recovering deleted (but not overwritten) data, like the undelete tools in the DOS era.

    3. Re:Bad Sectors are Your Enemy by CyberSp00k · · Score: 1

      I'm taking a course in computer forensics. I picked up "Forensic Discovery" by Farmer & Venema (ISBN 0-201-63497-X) for a bit more rigorous look at the subject than the course textbook was providing. On page 147, there's a wonderful picture of "Residuals of overwritten information on the sides of magnetic disk tracks" (supporting a discussion on p.146 of the characteristics of analog recording of digital information). The image, and others like it, can be found on the Veeco website at:

      ( http://www.veeco.com/nanotheatre/nano_view.asp?Cat ID=3&page=2&recs=20&CP=# )

      This not only presents the image of the residual data dramatically, it also makes the point that the technology to recover residual data is real and commercial, not just theoretical or restricted to three-letter agencies.

      --
      Spiritus ex Machina
      "The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it's stranger than we CAN imagine."
    4. Re:Bad Sectors are Your Enemy by hankwang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was an interesting link. However, I quote:

      OVERWRITTEN TRACK ON A HARD DISK
      (...) Acquisition time was about five minutes. Track width and skew, transition irregularities, and the difference between erased and virgin areas are visible. 25 micrometer scan.
      That is five minutes of acquisition time for around one byte of information. I actually thought it would be a few bytes per second, but it's even worse than that: five minutes per byte! That'd only be useful if you know where to look within many GBs of data. Before you've found c:/Users and Settings/Cyberspook/projects/classified/secret.doc you probably have to recover (optimistically) 10 kB of directory data (i.e. 5 weeks of scanning), after which a 100 kB word document will take another year. Based on this I don't see a reason to worry very much.
    5. Re:Bad Sectors are Your Enemy by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      even if they pull out the platter and put it under an atomic force microscopy with a magnetic sensing tip, and really can identify a bit with 90% probability even after overwriting... if you need a byte, you are down to 50%, if you need a word, 18%.
      And 90% may be doable if its overwriten once, but if its overwritten 5 times, it isnt.


      Except that the more bits you know, the easier it is to figure out the other bits. The raw data on the platters contain tons of ECC, and if you have an idea of what you are looking for, you may be able to "help out" with smarter than normal, domain-spcific ECC algorithms.

      It may not be easy, but if it is simply possible, then its just a matter of money and how much.

  170. Re:An embedded PC-driven entropy rewriter/degausse by Jay+Carlson · · Score: 1

    It uses modular exponentation to generate a cryptographically random sector distribution list, ... then cuts power to the drive and degausses the entire disk.

    50% Informative and 50% Interesting? For such a pile of random buzzwords shoved into sentences like five year old stacking their toys into a big heap, I was expecting 20% Funny, 40% Overrated, and 60% Troll.

    Oh come on, slashdot math DOES work like that.

  171. An all natural data destruction solution by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    LAVA!

    If your hard drive or the data survives the lava, let 'em have it, because whoever goes diving into lava to get a hard drive obviously *really* wants to get the data. :)

  172. shotgun by chihowa · · Score: 1
    What a funny coincidence, I just "securely wiped" a few old hard drives this weekend with a couple of 12 ga slugs. I suppose that slagging the leftover shards would be a good idea after that...

    My method has the benefit of being a bit more fum than a degausser or wipe utility. (Actually I wiped them first...)

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  173. A stick welder and cutting rod does it for me by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    A hundred amps, intense heat and sputter. Ten seconds a drive. Hard to go past that for making data unrecoverable. (-:

    Good luck RMAing the drive - "Uh, it jus' come apart in me 'and, surr" - but OTOH anything you do to erase the data on a dead drive is likely to void the warranty anyway."

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:A stick welder and cutting rod does it for me by SYFer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well then, my good man, may I interest you in the U.S. Forge G9123 Leather Welding Apron w/ 42" Bib?

      SYFer Data Security Associates
      Proudly Serving the Public Sector Since 2005

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    2. Re:A stick welder and cutting rod does it for me by MSZ · · Score: 1
      anything you do to erase the data on a dead drive is likely to void the warranty anyway

      I don't understand something here... If the drive is dead, you can't really do anything except smashing, burning etc. You can't format/erase it 'coz it's dead and not responding!

      If it's still responding then it's not dead and can be cleaned with some software.

      Or is this the issue of having the device to "cover your ass" in case of inspection rather than actually functioning?
      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
    3. Re:A stick welder and cutting rod does it for me by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Actually... If you really want to get the data off the drive, you can get around that.

      There are companies that can take your drive into a clean room, open it and take the individual platters off of them and then read the bits off the undamaged parts of the platters.

      So, just because your disk is making the dreaded "clunk-o-death" the data is probably salvagable.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  174. Wood Chipper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think something like this would do the trick: 2.5hp Chipper Shredder.

  175. When you've got the bucks, shred it. by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

    Certain TLA's simply shred their hard drives, but then money's no object for them. Here's a company that'll do it for you. Boy could I have fun with one of those.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  176. i dont get this... by serialhex · · Score: 1

    ok... let me get this streight...

    your going to delete information on a drive your about to RMA because it's dead...

    so you want a peice of hardware/software that will magically bring this DEAD drive back to life, and write to the whole platter 7+ times?

    sir, if you can write to the WHOLE PLATTER enough to erase data on a DEAD DRIVE then your drive probably isnt dead.

    and if it isnt dead, and just flaky... i've noticed that linux via ide and isb-ide devices allow you to read/write to flaky drives usually. and there is some software out there that can do that. alturnatively you can probably just write a script that will write 1's, then 0's to the whole drive multiple times and at the end will write random characters to the drive.

    in fact, i think i'ma go learn how to do just that.

    --
    ---- The first point-and-click interface was a Smith & Wesson
  177. So who's the criminal here? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    My wife is a Ph.D. Psychologist (tm)

    So, she tests a lot of kids for ADHD and High IQ.

    If I toss a computer that might have old data on it, even if I "Just" reformat it, who is the HIPPA criminal?

    The person (my Wife) who trashes the hardware, or the malcontent who goes thru to read some obscure file format, to determine some kid's IQ?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:So who's the criminal here? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      ---The person (my Wife) who trashes the hardware, or the malcontent who goes thru to read some obscure file format, to determine some kid's IQ?

      WHen trash is on the corner, anybody has the right to rummage. The Police have fought for that one, for due reason.

      And since your wife didnt go through proper disposal methods of destroying information (at least a 7-pass DoD reccomended), I'd say a judge would find your wife negligent. If, though, a Computer Expert reccomended a "format", I'd exonerate her and go after the "expert".

      --
  178. Sure to work by JeffTL · · Score: 1

    The best way is to not worry about returning the drives under warranty, just buy a new one.

    And as for the old one, a sledgehammer and a horseshoe magnet should do the trick. Beat the HE-double-hockeysticks out of the drive (or maybe just the removed platters, if you want to save some energy by unscrewing the case), and then pass a magnet over the fragments a few times in the hope that anything still left might be scrambled.

    A solar death ray should be able to handle a hard disk too. 600 degrees Celsius should cut it, eh? Of course, it's cheaper just to shatter the platter with a sledgehammer.

    (Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, engineer, physicist, chemist, biologist, or healthcare professional, nor do I play any of the above on TV. By acting upon any suggestions contained herein, which do not constitute expert advice, you agree implicitly to this contract. I am not responsible for injury, death, destruction, dismemberment, liability, or prosecution such as may ensue from your actions. Use at your own risk, contains no CFCs, Barbie(R) dolls do not talk or move by themselves. Do not eat iPod shuffle)

  179. Drill press by szquirrel · · Score: 1

    Until this week I worked at a place where we had to deal with literally hundreds of bad drives and a company hyper-paranoid about data security. Old drives were sent to a scrap yard to be shredded but the data had to be well and truly trashed first. DoD wipe works great but only for good drives, not bad ones.

    Our solution for bad drives: A drill press. Drilling is fast and reasonably secure. It keeps the platters together with the serial number for easy record keeping. Drilling completely through the drive makes spot-checking a breeze. Just be sure you use 3/8" cobalt-tipped bits (that thick top plate will eat plain bits like candy) and stab them into a can of Crisco every so often to keep them lubricated.

    Note: This may void your warranty.

    --
    Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
  180. SLAGG IT' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data slagging would make it impossible without a doubt to recover data. All you need is a friend that does metal casting and your in business.

    Note: This is a great way to pick up th' ladies.
    http://driveslag.eecue.com/

  181. OMG!!! DOUBLE PLUS FUNNY!!!! by Viceice · · Score: 0, Redundant

    OMG!!! DOUBLE PLUS FUNNY!!!!

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  182. Secure Hard Drive Deletion Appliance by Elote · · Score: 1

    One word...MAGNETRON! juss nuke it

    1. re: Secure Hard Drive Deletion Appliance by mpmorris · · Score: 1

      I've found a product that is DoD certified and HIPAA compliant. www.tabernus.com/products/diskpurge.html and www.diskpurge.com It looks like a consumer (less expensive) version of the product is coming out soon (at the end of the month) and would be perfect for your needs. Good luck! Morris

  183. Re:DBAN at net cafes by weighn · · Score: 1
    Sounds like something which might be fun to run at, say, net cafes. :-)

    perhaps if you're 15 and found that the auto re-imaging process on those machines has made all your scripts useless?

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  184. Stupid question by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    If an agency is working with sensitive information, why is ANY information stored on individual PCs? Information like that should be stored centrally, so access to the information can be audited easily. And if it is so important, do you really want to be in the game of keeping it where it can be lost if a PC goes down?

    I work in the banking industry. We do not allow any information to reside on the individual PC level. I maintain the PCs... I don't bother to ask if you have personal info when it is time to replace the PC... if you do, you are violating company policy and would be written up.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Stupid question by Arimus · · Score: 1

      Hm, not a stupid question.

      What about the local cache(swap space)/temporary files/browser history etc...

      My PC at work while everything is stored on the server has more than a few tmp files (I know, one day I will get around to removing them) from bombed out windows sessions etc...

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    2. Re:Stupid question by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Good point. I admit I had not thought of that. however, wouldn't this be easy enough to kill on shut down each night? There are several free programs that will intercept the shut-down event, run a series of commands, and then shut-down the PC.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Stupid question by Arimus · · Score: 1

      Trouble is you would need to run a program to clear all the temp files then shred them, then do the same to the swap space - which is the tricky bit... :(

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  185. Ask them by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Before you return the drive ask them how they would like you to destroy the data. The might be entitled to their drive back, but they need to tell you what to do. If you are trustworthy they are likely to say something like "Send us the circuit board and destroy the rest". Normally they want proof that you are using the RMA to get a second free drive. Sometimes (rarely) they want the broken drive so engineering can figure out why it died, in which case they might have other instructions. You need to ask though.

  186. Solo Master Image Masster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something like that we use at work to wipe drives to the DoD standard...kinda expensive, but can be used for other things too. Sorry I couldn't find a link

  187. This might do it... by dickens · · Score: 1

    If the sledgehammer treatment seems too uncivilized:

    Try this.

  188. I use the MRI by nicotinix · · Score: 1

    Our 1.5-tesla phased-array coil MRI does the trick for me.

  189. remove the cover plate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For drives that need to be RMA'd from "black hole" environments, you can usually just send the cover plate back. They may want the drive w/o the platters, and they may want you to sign a letter indicating the drive has been destroyed, but most drive manufacturers have to deal with the reality of users (esp. government) not allowing the drive to be returned.

  190. Run a Magnet around it while it's Running by Firaga01 · · Score: 1

    How about simply running a high-powered magnet around the HD while it's running? WOuldn not such a crude method be effective?

  191. Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are you going to get a "Dead Drive" to spin up and work in the deletion process? There's a real simple fix for this one, friend - take the drive outside and beat the living hell out of it, shatter every plate, and throw it away. Take the money you saved by not implementing this crazy deletion box, and buy ten new disks.

    If you're looking to invest in something that will make deletion of data on dead drives easier, you can find it at your local hardware store - it's called a compressor and air tools.

  192. Works great! by radar_uk · · Score: 1

    Very customizable and tasks (as the individual wiping profiles are called) can be customized to be fast or extremely thorough.

    And he's right. It's cleared for use in wiping classified disks, so I'm pretty sure it'll cover HIPAA too.

  193. A big magnet by hpygocrazy · · Score: 1

    All you should need to destroy the data on a hard drive is an electro magnet. At my work we had one, that was a little smaller than an iron, that we used to rapidly destroy round reel, and cartridge tapes.

  194. Are these the kinds of devices you're looking for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but it seems like it might fit the bill. They're made for the IT pro or a forensic analyst --- or so it seems:

    http://www.diskology.com/
    http://forensics.wiebetech.com/products/adapters.p hp

    I hope this helps, there are probably others, these are just some I know about.

  195. Secure HD Deletion Appliance: by youknowmewell · · Score: 1
  196. Two Words: Metal Shredder by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as a perfectly secure wipe, especially not of a drive you can't write to. Crack the case, pull the platters, run them through an industrial metal shredder. I defy anyone to retrieve useful data from a mixed box of shreddings from multiple platters from multiple drives.

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
    1. Re:Two Words: Metal Shredder by Crash+Gordon · · Score: 1

      This movie makes me cry like a girl...

  197. Linksys Network attached storage for USB drives. by Embedded · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like a good job could be done automatically by changing the application code for the Linksys NSLU2 which as we know has complete Linux source available and also has a substantial following.

    http://www.nslu2-linux.org/

    1) Format to EXT3 deleting all partions.
    2) DOD wipe. Format to Desired End state.

    Mail if you are interested. Cheers!

    --
    Vista, the single biggest argument for Desktop Linux! It doesn't "Just Work"(TM).
  198. Re:An embedded PC-driven entropy rewriter/degausse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you expect more out of the moderators than the chatterers themselves are capable of?

  199. Degaussing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deguassing works great, except the drive is unusable afterwards (everything inside gets messed up, motor, magnets, etcs). It is the one universally accepted method for destroying classified hard drives. Just make sure you are really far away from the machine with any credit cards when it gets turned on.

  200. Use an MRI machine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like you work in a healthcare facility.

    Is it a hospital, perchance?

    Why not shoot the HDD's through your MRI at night, when the machine is idle? It should be fun to use that big ol' magnet as a mass driver! Just reinforce/protect the wall it will fly into!

    Seriously, though. A *really* strong magnet ought to do it, even if the MRI approach (OK, dangerous projectile run through expensive gear) might not be the one.

  201. Quality family time by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to believe that you find a sledge more fun than a torch, a better workout yes, more fun no. But I may be biased, my grandfather is a retired master welder (or something like that, whatever you call the guys rated to assemble submarines). Time to spend some quality time with grandpa. ;-)

  202. Going to Hawaii to implement ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Active volcano

    Good idea, time to visit volcano national park on the big island of Hawaii. Honest Mr. IRS Auditor, it was a business trip. ;-)

  203. Forget hi tech, Platter meet Mr. Belt Sander. by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    As much as I enjoy hi tech it is not the answer for everything. C-clamp the platter to a bench, put a second c-clamp in the hole as a safety, apply the belt sander.

  204. Skeet launchers don't work so well ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Been there, done that. At least with AOL CDs. They launch just fine but they are much faster than a clay and present a very slim profile. Nearly impossible to hit. I don't expect platters would be much better.

  205. Just defraggle it! by Megane · · Score: 1
    Defraggle your motherdisc!

    (You can substitute a Brillo pad if Svinto isn't handy.)

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  206. If you're tossing out a hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your best bet is to take a large hammer and hit the damn thing a few times until it sounds like confectionary sugar inside. simple fix.
    I've done that before. :P works like a charm.

  207. Hands down the best standalone device i've used. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it can be finicky about drives, depending on how much you want to spend you can duplicate or wipe (to DoD) virtually every disk you can get your hands on.

    http://www.ics-iq.com/

  208. A clarification for those new to manual labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0-5 lbs. is a hammer.
    5-8 lbs. is a maul.
    Over 8 lbs. is a sledge.

    Now, back to your keyboards, I've work to do.

  209. Government's good enough for me by djinn2020 · · Score: 1
    any disk wiper that is US Department of Defense 5220.22 M compliant is generally good enough

    a good free utility is SDelete, developed by Sysinternals Freeware. 5220.22 M compliant. What's good about this is you can choose the number of passes on a drive -- in case you didn't feel safe with one pass.

    That and it's free

    --
    Mens et Manus
  210. hdd deletion by satmech · · Score: 1

    One Word... kiln.

    (but keep the magnets!)

  211. Oxygen Acetylene torch by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    I've always been told that Aluminum will burn like magnesium if you get it hot enough. I wonder if a cutting torch could ignite it?

  212. Ready My Axe by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    well in this context anyway

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  213. Torx Driver by ExRex · · Score: 1

    The platters make nice hand mirrors.

    --
    The closer you are to the code, the happier you are. - Ancient Geek Proverb
  214. Why not just use an improbability drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then the hard drive will be in some random time and place, with a very very slim chance to be found by anybody who could read them?

    There'd be less of a chance than a stored broken drive getting stolen.

  215. i have a novel approach by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1

    I use a Craftsman drill and a small carbide bit. Goes through all drive platters like butter. Don't even need to remove the drive from the machine (assuming the whole PC is being decomissioned, of course). I suppose it would be possible for someone with incredibly vast resources to recover some bits and pieces of data, but man, I doubt it. Think of all the shrapnel grinding around in there! You'd have to have some pretty sensitive and valueable data on that drive to need better than this technique, I think.

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
  216. System O' Drives by Chaos1 · · Score: 1

    At out office we have a machine that has different rail sets for our drives (which are already in carriers - some LianLi others StorCase), so we just lock them in and boot off of a floppy (mini-linux distro homebrew). We then 'dd /dev/hdx' a couple of times before we take a radio shack magnet to them. Afterwards we dismantle the drives and either smach the glass platters or make frisbee/wall decorations with the metal platters.

    Not sure if this is something you can use, but it has come in handy for us. I imagine with SCSI you could have an external tower with rails in them for sliding the drives in and out without having to crack the case each time.

    --
    I only need the Preview button when I haven't used the Preview button.
  217. One Word ....... Knoppix by Allnighterking · · Score: 2, Informative

    To wipe the drive insert a knoppix disk, once booted mount your partitions. Cd to a partition and type

    # shred [options] *

    man shred for specifics but shred does NSA style wipes of HDD with as many overwrites as you want (25 is stock) then follow it up with rm -Rf * (since shred destroys the data not the "name") then once all files on all partitions are "wiped" fdisk it, one big partition and put a new file system on it.

    This can be done to NSA standards with a little bit of effort.

    shred is beyond any doubt the most overlooked utility in Linux/Unix.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  218. Try this for managing hard drives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.fwb.com/html/diskjockey.html

    Security Erase - Disk Jockey offers you two levels of disk erasure: the first is the quick, one-pass hard disk data erase which erases all data on the drive. The second is the NSA standard three-pass erase for ultimate security. Perfect for government and forensic applications when security is critical.

  219. Logicube makes the devices you want by crusher2k · · Score: 1

    http://www.logicube.com/ The sonix one has a 7 pass DoD standard wipe option.

  220. there is only one way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to thoroughly and fully delete all the data on a hard drive is to cast said hard drive into the fiery cauldron of Mt Doom.

  221. Wipemaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just Purchase one of these... http://www.ics-iq.com/index.cfm/action/catalog.bro wse/category/WipeMasster/id_category/24e3fd9e-e45d -489e-a15b-6fcd2f807f0d It won't work with some of the physically damaged drives, but it is the best solution I have seen.

  222. The best hard-drive deletion device money can buy by psykocrime · · Score: 2, Insightful
    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  223. Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For God's sake people, could we be realistic? I realize that Slashdot is full of Type A geeks, but civil commitment-level paranoid Type A geeks?

    If you work with a government security classification, then to be safe, this does not apply, but for the REST OF YOU:

    Completely overwrite the drive in one pass, or completely write off the drive and take a sledgehammer to it.

    Other than a few articles that suggest that you could retrieve data from a hard drive platter using magnetic force scanning tunneling microscopy, can anyone document any instance of somebody actually recovering data from a fully overwritten or fragmented platter?

    Have you considered how many people actually have access to a scanning tunneling microscope?

    Have you considered that this technique was described at a time when hard drive areal densities were less than 1 Gb/in^2? (that is less than 1 GB per platter)

    Have you noticed that nobody has described the SPEED at which a scanning tunneling microscope can read data off of your not-obsolete-but-not-so-'leet 120 GB Maxtor hard drive? Will you and your family be dead before a significant fraction of the surface has been examined for the purpose of recovering your oh-so generic porn collection?

    And finally, but perhaps most importantly, have you, like most teenagers, figured out that only a remarkably small fraction of humanity cares for you as anything more than an economic statistic?

    If you want to brag about how unrecoverable your information is, then that's great. But intimidating normal people into going to paranoid lengths to "secure" obsolete data is just going to make it more of a problem than it's worth.

    If I want to get your private data so badly, I'm going to save myself the trouble of buying/renting a scanning tunneling microscope. I'm going to watch you go to work, school or the grocery store, and I'm going to smash and grab your computer and/or hard drive. It's cheaper, easier, and by God faster than any technique besides "embarass the formerly anonymous idiot seller on eBay".

  224. HIPA Should be Spelled PITA by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 1
    Pain In The A.......

    I have to clean 5 drives a month, every month, and reuse if possible. I have turned to running Norton Ghost of a Fresh windows install overnight (all of our workstation drives are 80 GB drives) and physically "Deleting" (1500lb press brake) those that fail. Cheap, easy, and secure. I do wish a piece of hardware existed out there, off the shelf, to do what you suggest though.

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
  225. dd? by codergeek42 · · Score: 0

    #!/bin/bash
    PASSES=50;
    for LCV in $(seq 1 ${PASSES} );
    do
    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdX bs=1
    dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hdX bs=1;
    done
    echo -ne "Now go dump your disk in acid! ^_^"

  226. A good grinder never hurts either by dschnur · · Score: 1

    Watch the videos on http://www.goldcircuit.com/
    It's a really neat place where old computers go to get ground up. Looks like they could handle a few tons of hard drives per hour too...

    If worse comes to worse, makes for some good internet tv watching...

  227. DoD policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently at my location the policy is "The bomb" gets dropped on all old outgoing hard drives. Essentially a very powerful electro magnet is fired at the drive equivalent to the EMP of a 20KT blast. Destroying any data on the drive and some of the IC's on it as well rendering it permanently useless and unrecoverable. Along with throwing it accross the containment chamber making a really neat sound.

  228. Hard Drive Cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am ignorant in this regard, but what about a good old fashioned magnet?

    Since the hard drives are magnetic, I would think that swiping the drives with a big magnet would wipe them entirely.. would it not?

  229. Software + Thermite by photon317 · · Score: 1


    There's tons of available software. Just dedicate a PC to the task and shove drives in it and wipe them with any of the many secure erase utilities out there that at minimum do the DoD standard patterns. Some of the utilities do a great deal more than the standard DoD patterns for better security, but they take longer.

    If the drive is malfunctioning at all, don't trust the delete. And don't trust deguassers unless you've really done your homework on the theory (how much does it take to destroy your drive? it varies by drive. What distance does the device need to be from the platters to be effective? Can you leave the case on?). Even if you can answer those questions, I would feel better using physical destruction than degaussing.

    Don't trust simplistic physical destruction either, like drilling holes, or whacking the whole drive with a hammer. People can and will extract data off of fragments of platter. Best bet would be to open up the drive, remove the platters, and melt them with thermite. Don't do it in your office though, do it outside on thick pavement or something - the stuff is very hot and very dangerous. Google for how to make the thermite yourself. Basic ingredients are essentially rust and finely powdered aluminum, and a magnesium strip to ignite it with. It'll melt/burn the platters.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  230. Metal Shredders by DreamerFi · · Score: 1

    Like this one

  231. Re:Old HDD with weird little symbol ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im pretty sure I know what that is.

    Just my guess, but I believe thats one of those drives from 'not classified but sensitive' kind of data. We got a bunch of pallets like that with mil-spec drives and such.

    The sorta-classified is usually ranked as such if too much of that sorta-classified data comes together, it could create a classified source.

    Mainly, the reason for sorta-classified is to make it easy on us to not have to keep track of those. We have to tally every week (or day, if we use paper) whenever we use classified or top secret. It sucks.

  232. Discussed to death by experts by Decker-Mage · · Score: 4, Informative
    We've discussed this issue to death over in the Computer Forensics list (http://www.securityfocus.com). The conclusion is that the only mechanism that is absolutely compliant is physical destruction of the platter(s). There is a deguasser that may meet current compliancy requrements (note: current!), however it runs about $40,000 per unit and as coercivity increases with new designs, will quickly become obsolete.

    Sorry folks, I'd rather rely on my community there than a bunch of fellow /.'s (grin). Elitist? Yar!

    --
    "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
  233. Shatter the drive by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    As I know, most drives now days are built using glass substrait platters. For example, one day I took apart a dead laptop IBM drive once. As I was playing around with it, I dropped the drive. What really sucked however, was that the all the platters shattered into tiny glass slivers/shard which made cleanup a major PITA.

    But now that I think about it, this really is good for security. Should the FBI ever come knocking on my door (not they would have a reason mind you), I would yank the drive and hit the damn think really hard with a hammer. What do you know eh? An instant maraca!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  234. 1st: keep data encrypted by mennucc1 · · Score: 1

    As a first step, you should keep the data encrypted on all your hard drives while you are using them (both Linux and Windows/NTFS will enable you). Then, when you want to reuse them, you erase them with the best tool around. If someone will try to recover data from that HD, they will get, at most, fragments of encrypted data: not very informational.

    1. Re:1st: keep data encrypted by cpghost · · Score: 1

      both Linux and Windows/NTFS will enable you

      On FreeBSD, you can encrypt partitions with GBDE. on NetBSD with cgd.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  235. Three-step solution... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    1. Encrypt
    Miracles can happen in hard disk recovery, much more rarely in encryption. Even if it auto-boots, all you really need to destroy is the key block, other fragments are useless.

    2a. Wipe
    If it is working, use something like dban to work it over. The only potential danger left is that the key block has been remapped (less than one in a million chance of that, on top of everything else).

    2b. Degauss
    If it is not working, degauss it. IBAS and whatnot sell them. See if you can get it RMA'd (If you're a company with legitimate security concerns, they will... otherwise you might switch HDD supplier). If not, I guess you have to eat the cost.

    3. Total annihilation
    If the first two didn't cover it, open the drive, degauss the platters directly, shred them to shrapnel and then melt them to a piece of slag. You can still try to get a RMA based on the casing, depending on who you are.

    The truth is that RMAs, with shipping, diagnostic, refurbishing, repackaging and reshipping costs quite a bit due to low and sporadic volume. A large steady volume of purchases is worth far more than a few missing RMAs, don't forget that when negotiating.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  236. A Job for Knoppix by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    You don't have to read the drive partition to properly kill it. listening to the drive partition can actually cause you to miss critical data, if a partition has been removed ("it was the really critical data, so I removed the partition before I gave it to you"). In fact, you should be trashing the entire drive including the partition data.

    In Linux, the command would be 'shred /dev/hda' The shred program will do multiple passes of random data (default 25) /proc/partitions should give you a list of the drives available and their sub-partitions. If you're shredding the entire drive (/dev/hda) you can safely ignore the partitons (/dev/hda[0-9]+).

    Knoppix boots off of a CD-ROM, so you don't have to worry about accidently erasing the OS -- and, as long as the machine you're wiping can boot off of a CD, you can even shred the drive in place before you take it out to ship it (just make sure you shred the right drive).

    If you want an 'appliance' then you can build it with

    • A boot CD-ROM
    • an external USB drive enclosure which does IDE->USB.
      (to 'load', you just unplug the enclosure, load a new drive, plugi it in. The system should recognize it. Syslog output should give you all the info you need).
    • a SCSI controller with adaptors for the various drive plugs. If you start with an ultra-wide drive, you should be able to get adapters that will allow you to go all the way back to old SCSI-1.
    • an SATA controller/plug
    • I don't know if there are any native-firewire drive. Chances are you should be able to take the raw (ide/scsi) drive out of the enclosure and use one of the other connectors to munch it.
    • Spare cables... If you do this often enough, the cables will start to wear out. As they do replace the cable in the system (avoid plugging/unplugging the end that connects to the board as much as possible to avoid permanent impairment).
    • You may have to build your own kernel to recognize RLL drives and controllers, or older, but Linux should recognize it. You will probably need a mobo that accepts ISA cards (P3 or earlier CPUs, generally).
    For something that even a custom-build Linux kernel can't write to, I think you'd probably have to go to early '80s technology (or really esoteric hardware that's more recent).
    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:A Job for Knoppix by cowbutt · · Score: 1

      Using shred isn't necessary for any modern hard disc. Something like 'dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda obs=512' is sufficient, as good as you're going to get if you're working from behind the drive's on-board electronics and is faster than shred. This is paraphrased from the epilogue of Peter Gutmann's classic paper http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_ del.html. PRML has been widely used since at least 1998 (a 6GB IBM drive I bought then was PRML).

    2. Re:A Job for Knoppix by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      I originally thought that that was what shred did. I guess you could write your own:
      #!/bin/bash for i in {1,2,3,4,5}{1,2,3,4,5} ; do
      dd if=/dev/urandom of="$1" bs=100k
      done
      I like larger block sizes. It seems to work better for most drive caches -- in fact, I usually go to around 1M.
      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    3. Re:A Job for Knoppix by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      No, shred uses specially-chosen patterns in order to maximise the chances of making data unrecoverable from media recorded using older techniques (e.g. MFM and RLL), even using electron microscopy (i.e. techniques one might expect a hostile foreign intelligence agency to use). Shred was originally really intended for use when wishing to securely erase a single file. However, with modern journalling filesystems, this is no longer guaranteeable, so shred is deprecated for this purpose as it gives a false sense of security.

      Shred also does a total of nine random passes, and, to be fair, it actually has its own RNG rather than just relying on /dev/[u]random. For this alone, it might be worth using (though Gutmann's paper suggests only "a few" random passes are necessary for modern discs; I interpret "a few" as two or three).

      Your point about larger block sizes is well made, but I'm not sure what dd will do if it encounters a write error on a 512 byte block if its block size is greater than 512 bytes. In fact, IIRC, dd will terminate on a write error, so you probably need something that'll just skip over write errors.

    4. Re:A Job for Knoppix by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      I would expect that urandom is probably better than gutmann's RNG, since it depends on the entropy pool that feeds /dev/random. As for I/O errors, I think that you can tell DD to skip over read errors (probably at the block level as you worry about), but the man page doesn't make reference to write errors. You might have to skip manually.
      I remember having to so something like trying to determine the extent of errors on a drive that had a bad patch. The best I can think to do would be to write a PERL script to read the errors (if any) from dd, and respond accordingly with reruns of dd

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    5. Re:A Job for Knoppix by cowbutt · · Score: 1

      dd_rescue skips read errors, so maybe it skips write errors too (though maybe not, given its intended use). If it doesn't, it should at least provide a good start for a tool that does.

  237. How about using a microcontroller? by dioxide · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have no doubt that you could use an AVR or PIC microcontroller to do this, and it wouldn't even be hard to design. IDE interface, microcontroller, maybe some kind of random number generator, and you'd be set.

    This is kinda interesting, I think I'll look into it. Add a few buttons on the front of the dongle to chose your paranoia level..

  238. I used a drill and a tank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took a drill and drilled a crapload of holes in them. Then I carted them down to the motorpool and had an M1A1 tank run over them.
    You'd be surprised what we used tanks for back in the day...crushing tank air filters, crushing empty cans, crushing looters' cars, etc.

  239. Fire by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 0

    Provider of warm, scurge of Prometheus. Eradicator of dead files. I can not think of a single problem that fire (and lots of it) can not fix.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  240. old netware. by ecalkin · · Score: 1

    old netware 2.x required a process called compsurf. it was part of the setup. netware 3.x and 4 had the tool also (i think).

    compsurf ran a write and read test pattern on *every* byte of the hard drive. there were multiple bit patterns run.

    in the early 1990s, when a large hard drive was 300MB (M not G), a compsurf took several days.

    i would look into that.

    eric

  241. Destruct-O-Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of various regulations (HIPAA for starters), we need to at least attempt to do a good job clearing the disk. I've heard from a number of places, including this Slashdot story, that degaussing isn't great.

    I recommend you the Destruct-O-Tron

    Also works for motherboards, etc...

  242. DBAN by Geniusagar · · Score: 1

    dban.sf.net

  243. Nope... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
    Writing random data over a drive *twice* will destroy all the data on it. Well, not *quite* all because there are a couple of tracks reserved by the drive firmware. However, nothing that goes over the IDE bus can ever touch those, so they're not worth worrying about.


    The whole idea of reading stuff that has "spread" from the side of the tracks doesn't really work. In any case, the head will always write with roughly the same amount of spread. The way it works is this - read off what you can of the spread at the side of the track. Work out the difference in flux density between the spread and and actual track. This will allow you to recover the last lot of data written. If you write two sets of random data, your original data may still be vaguely readable in the spread area but you won't know what the last lot of random data was, so you cannot extract it.


    For a good source of random noise, plug a good white noise source into your sound card.

  244. easy by calyptos · · Score: 1

    insert drive and just do this a good 8 or 9 times as root:

    cat /dev/urandom > /dev/hdb

    --
    http://illhostit.com/ - Webhosting
  245. Electromagnets? by David+Horn · · Score: 1

    Just create an enclosure that holds the drive and wrap 200 turns of wire around it. Connect that to an oscillating electric source. Probably doesn't need to be more than about 12V.

    Even if it doesn't work, it'll give the drive one hell of a headache.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  246. recycle safely by Eatmorecake · · Score: 0

    If you're talking about MANY MANY hard drives, you could still recycle them after shredding them back, nearly to sand, with something like this. Nevermind degaussing, the rds, and all the techno-jargon. This is something that even grandpa can enjoy!!!

    http://www.securitymagazine.com/CDA/ArticleInforma tion/features/BNP__Features__Item/0,5411,133140,00 .html

    --
    Don't you mean.. BIZZARO! ..Signature?
  247. My solution Re:Unscrewed segment covered topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. open up you HD thus voiding your warranty
    2. buy a grinder to "erase" your disk
    3. grind your HD
    4. All securely erased

  248. Re:USE Symantec GDisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Symantec Ghost (not Norton Ghost) includes a DOS utility called Gdisk which is current to the latest DoD specs for disk wiping !

  249. doesn't add up by huded · · Score: 0, Troll

    you said: "Right now, I am probably doing a minimum of ten secure wipes every month. A new hard drive would cost roughly a hundred bucks. That's 12,000 dollars annually, minimum, just on hard drives, which would be wasted."

    I'm willing to bet that the portion of your salary that covers the time spent wiping drives is more than the $12,000 cost of replacing them. So -- if you're truly serious about maximizing revenue, then recommend the company fire you and use the cost savings to treat more indigent people.

    1. Re:doesn't add up by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      uhhh... Using DBAN takes about 5 minutes of my time, and then I leave the PC sitting in an empty cubicle for a few hours. I'm sure I'm cheaper than the HD's would be. Especially because I work at a non-profit, so my salary probably isn't as high as it would be at a more corporate gig.

  250. No Other Suggestions, Except... by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

    If you give up, and time is short, don't forget the other military edict regarding the disposal of 'sensitive' electronics: "Heat sufficient to melt steel, or a hastily dug hole and the use of explosives."

    A Gutmann scenario might work very well, but personally, lacking the sort of kiln required in the event of failure, I lean towards the foxhole/grenades idea.

  251. The Issues: & a (possible) Solution by amcdiarmid · · Score: 0

    1) Need to distroy data
    2) It takes about seven formats to adquately remove the data. (I mean so that the FBI can't read it)
    3) Now how about dead drives?

    Problem 1) If the security regulations state that you need to destroy your data, you need to do it. (HIPAA privacy sections, Defense related crap, ...)

    Problem 2) I remember seeing a quote that formatting does not do the job, as you also need to remove the resonance of the old bits: You can zero the drive, but real intelligence agencies can tell the difference between what was always a zero, and what has just been changed to a zero.

    Think about it, if your magno-meter (TM) reads from 0-9 and you have been using 5 as binary "1". If a particular bit was always 0, its magnometer rating is going to be closer to 0 than 4. Similarly, if you just changed your 1 to a 0, it magnometer rating is going to be more of a 4 than a 0. Hence, assume all values towards 0 or 9 were 0/1; assume all values near 4.5 have just been changed: now you can see a bunch of data.

    Problem 3) If the platter is good, but the circuit board is bad - you can't format the drive anyhow.

    Solution: magnatize it. OK you can take good drives and format them repeatedly under Linux (in a usb or firewire drive sled), but this won't work for dead drives & takes some time. If you put the drives in a strong enough field to magnitize the drive, you won't have any problems.

    Just take an industrial strength demagnitizer, and leave in "on" on the drive over night. When you can use the drive to pick up screws and paperclips from the carpet - you are set;)

  252. Did you mean "US Department of Defense 5220.22 M"? by CyberSp00k · · Score: 1

    If you meant "US Department of Defense 5220.22 M", try ( http://www.dss.mil/isec/nispom_0195.htm ). That's the home page for the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM).

    --
    Spiritus ex Machina
    "The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it's stranger than we CAN imagine."
  253. Sledge Hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We use a sledge hammer.
    I am not joking. Don't RMA the drive.

  254. Secure Harddisk Eraser by infolib · · Score: 1
    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  255. Too much child porn huh? by m00dawg · · Score: 0

    A simple way:
    Use Linux.
    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda
    Be happy.

    Need to delete all that child porn before the cops find out, huh?

  256. You fools! by essreenim · · Score: 1
    A high temperature furnace is the only way to go. Why have to explain the loud noises from your Mom's basement as a result of pump action reciol when a furnace is quiet, effective and leaves no evidence....

  257. erasure of drive contents by ajs318 · · Score: 1
    There is much misunderstanding of this.

    What it takes to securely delete data, so that it can never be recovered, is .....

    Exactly two overwrite cycles.

    Almost every computer ever built has used magnetic memory of one description or another to some greater or lesser extent. If magnetic memory really had a fourth dimension, there would be evidence for two phenomena. Firstly, accidental reads of "past" data would be be cited as a cause of misreads. Secondly, the phenomenon would have been commercially exploited. Although we think disk drives are cheap today, there have been times in the past when it would have been economically prudent to cram in a bit of extra storage, almost whatever it took.

    Human memory is not overwritten in the same way as machine memory: it's four-dimensional, meaning that events are stored with a timestamp and can be recalled at any time in future. Machine memory is three-dimensional -- unless you deliberately try to make it act four-dimensionally, by storing all updates in their own right.

    The nearest thing to four-dimensionality in magnetic memory is that you can sometimes discern a vague difference between a "1" written over a "1" and a "1" written over a "0", and you can sometimes discern a vague difference between a "0" written over a "1" and a "0". written over a "0". That's a natural phenomenon due to the hysteresis of magnetic media. The difference is hard to see because in digital recording, you are only concerned about two states; once the material has been magnetised to saturation, you are by definition outside of the hysteresis loop. Even near saturation, you are working away from the broadest part of the loop, and so the result you get will be subject to tolerance.

    Note also that the reading head of a disk drive is connected to an amplifier which is designed to saturate. The drive really doesn't know the difference. To be able to discern this information in practice, you would have to perform some serious mods on the drive.

    Don't pay any attention to the Guttmann report -- it's long out of date and has since been discredited, though it keeps popping up again and again. There are very few people in the world who could actually carry out the procedures talked about there for recovering overwritten data, and there are easier techniques anyway {find someone who knows that information and threaten them, their family and/or pets with torture .....}

    Think of data being stored using pennies on a revolving, felt-topped table, with heads for ones and tails for zeros. Maybe the pennies will leave a weak impression in the felt, but it's not certain. If you turn them all tails-up, then all the data that was stored by the pattern of heads and tails is lost, and all the impressions on the table felt will become impressions of heads; if you then turn all the pennies heads-up, then all the impressions will be tails.


    It ought to be almost trivially simple for motherboard manufacturers to build in a BIOS option to erase a hard drive. However, I've not found one on any machine newer that the Amstrad MegaPC; that had a Quadtel BIOS which incorporated a "drive test" function, which just happened to leave the drive in a known state, i.e. it erased it. I'm guessing that there are some political reasons for not doing so.
    1. People might think "what does this do?", use it, lose data and blame the motherboard manufacturer. Also, it might -- if it were supremely poorly implemented -- be used by a particularly nasty breed of malware.
    2. People who have data that The Authorities want, and that they don't want The Authorities to have, might find it too easy to put that data out of reach of The Authorities.
    3. Hard drive manufacturers sell more new drives if people are needlessly destroying new ones.
    4. Data Recovery firms don't want there being something out there that they re
    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:erasure of drive contents by tazanator · · Score: 1

      well you have some good points but I know in the mid 90's D.O.D. policy was to overwrite the hard drives in 1 than 0 a total of 10 passes. Rumor mill is the CIA and NSA shred their drives.

      --
      I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
    2. Re:erasure of drive contents by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of military policy, the laws of physics are quite clear on the matter: two overwrites make it impossible to recover data and one makes it supremely difficult.

      It's a weapons-versus-armour situation: either there is some weapon that no piece of armour can protect you against, or there isn't. It's impossible to have a weapon that can pierce absolutely any armour and armour that can withstand any weapon: the two are mutually exclusive.

      Either there is a way to make a disk drive really unreadable, or there isn't. Now, The Authorities like to be able to keep secrets; but they don't want anybody else to be able to keep secrets from them.

      What I'm alluding to is that at some level, The Authorities are almost certainly using a variety of unpleasant techniques -- torture, Extremely Strong Drugs and Mysterious Disappearance, for instance -- to recover information; but they also need to be able to deny that they are using such techniques. If someone is threatening to cook your dog and eat it in front of you, you'll probably tell them everything they want to know. And then they'll tell everyone else that they recovered the information from an old hard disk drive in a computer you sold to a friend a year or so ago. And Fido lives happily ever after.

      Of course, for that to fly, you would first have to cultivate the impression in the mind of the General Public {who are typically ignorant about science} that data saved on a hard disk is there forever, and can be recovered at any time. Hence, overkill in disposal of used drives. Hell, by their logic, you would have to demolish any building in which a conversation about classified matters had taken place!

      Then, of course, there's the situation where someone has 200GB of "Interesting Material" on a hard disk, gets a tip-off that someone is interested; and, using a few keystrokes on the BIOS setup screen, wipes it factory-fresh before The Authorities come around. A brand-new-looking hard drive is somewhat less useful as circumstantial evidence than the mangled remains of a hard drive and a neighbour reporting angle-grinder sounds. I somehow can't imagine the News of the World-reading General Public accepting this sort of thing, either.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  258. You want to erase a harddrive you say? by Daath · · Score: 1

    My old sysadmin, where I worked back in '92, had a LARGE electro magnet in a seperate room. Whenever a harddrive was to be discarded, he went in there, turned the magnet on, and passed it through the hole a few times. There was n-o-t-h-i-n-g on it afterwards. You can acquire one such magnet cheap. He took it out of some other equipment ;P

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  259. Disk Jockey can do it by appletag · · Score: 0

    The Disk Jockey from Diskology can do a 1-pass or 3-pass DOD erase. It can also dupe disks or just mout them on the computer. IT can also RAID two disks together. Must see the web site. I own one and LOVE it.

    --
    "Creation is messy. You want genius, you get madness, two sides of the same coin." --Steve Jobs
    1. Re:Disk Jockey can do it by appletag · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry. The web site stated NSA level of erasure. I'm unsure if it's DOD. I work with a Federal Prison that recycles actual DOD computers and they use a 3-pass erasure. This does a 3-pass.

      --
      "Creation is messy. You want genius, you get madness, two sides of the same coin." --Steve Jobs
  260. HD-1 Professional Degausser (thanks google!) by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    This should work well:

    http://www.datadev.com/v94.html

    -ted

  261. Why deal with sellers who require returned drives? by mikefocke · · Score: 1

    I'm an OEM and I buy drives from suppliers (IBM/Hitachi) who accept my companies written word who accepts my customer's written word that a drive has been destroyed or who accept a Xerox of the drive case and a written stastement (Seagate). Since my drives go into 3 letter agencies, I anticipate the possible repair need in selecting a supplier.

    Doesn't help you in your "transfer a working drive to another person" scenerio but does solve the RMA need (I never did figure out why I'd trust a overwrite performed by a drive that was known to be failing).

    And since the "transfer" case affects working systems, what you want there is a software product loaded from a floppy that deals with the drive on a physical level. Takes a long time given today's size drives.

  262. What's the level of demand? by Bozovision · · Score: 1

    How many people want this? And how much would you be prepared to pay? And how many disks do you want to clean each day?

    I'm imagining, you pull the disk from the box, slip it into a caddy. Slide the caddy into the cleaner, press a button. When a light goes green, that disk has been cleaned to a particular standard.

    If there's enough indication of demand, we'll build them. Send me an email - cleaner at tanasity dottt com, letting me know the answers to the questions above. Any mail I receive will be used for this purpose alone.

    Jeff Veit

  263. We have to deal with that as well. by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    What we do is use Autoclave for the IDE drives (max setting, or at the very least setting #3.) Although we'll be switching to DBAN since Autoclave is no longer around. For the SCSI Also there's nothing better than a circular saw. ;)

    I suppose a really good industrial wood-chipper would work as well, provided it could shred steel.

  264. Box? Microwave! by whitelabrat · · Score: 1

    For old or dead hard drives the only way to go is to destroy the platters. Open the drive. Scratch the platters. Bend the platters. Stomp on them. Yell at them. I'm not sure if microwaving would work, but that would be great if it does. Use a gauss device too.

    But that's not foolproof because there is still some data there. That's where starting with encryption on the whole drive is a plus as a precaution.

  265. I prefer Industrial Strength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here we use a 200-ton hydraulic press to destroy our drives. I'm paranoid, so I tend to take the drive apart and then just crush the plattens. The effects are wild. The smaller drives for laptops appear to have a platten made of glass. They shatter into a zillion pieces in the press, or turn into powder. The bigger tower drives must have a metal platten. They tend to grow significantly under the pressure. Pressing two of these plattens together results in a squishy mess.

  266. Hard Drive Workstation by dennis_k85 · · Score: 1

    www.corpsys.com sells exactly what you are looking for, call the pro hard drive workstation. It works on both IDE and SCSI hard drives. It duplicates , tests and DOD erases hard drives.

    --
    cd pub
    more beer
  267. Re:USE Symantec GDisk by G-Spot · · Score: 1

    This is correct, just use the /DOD switch and it will make 7 passes over the disk, overwriting with random data.

  268. Why do we even have "Ask Slashdot" by FinalCut · · Score: 1

    Over 480 responses and maybe only 2 actually answer his question.

    Instead everyone has to be a smartass and tell him that if the drive is damaged he can't write to it.

    He didn't ask that - he asked if there was a good device for securely wiping a harddrive. Is it really that freaking hard to stay on topic and just answer the guy?

    Ever time anyone has an ask slashdot it creates the "know-it-all" effect around here. Nobody actually knows the answer, but they feel inspired to spout off about everything they think they do know about.

    Just answer the question. sheesh.

    1. Re:Why do we even have "Ask Slashdot" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody actually knows the answer, but they feel inspired to spout off about everything they think they do know about.

      You must be new around here ;)

    2. Re:Why do we even have "Ask Slashdot" by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      not just suffered a moment of frustration at the complete waste of time that is /. reader comments :O)

  269. Absolute Data Deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to have a read through the article on Whitedust titled 'Absolute Data Deletion'. The article basically covers every possible angle to erasing sensitive data. Well worth a read.

  270. Paper About This... by Paris+The+Pirate · · Score: 1

    I recently wrote a paper on this topic http://www.whitedust.net/article/7/ and during the course of the research it became clear to me that the only sure way to absolutely and unrecoverably delete data from a HDD is to slag it in acid. Anything else has a relatively high margin of error. Think about all those old HDD's you chucked out after a PGP diskwipe... and what is most likly still recoverable off them. Be afraid.

  271. Sandpaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just sand the oxide off the platters. It's not that thick.

  272. Isn't that by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    what a microwave is for?

  273. magnet by logik3x · · Score: 1

    About using a big magnet wouldn't it kill the data on the HD ? just an idea...

  274. Interestingly enough.... by Hasai · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That's how we had to do it when dealing with hard drives that ever held classified information, as per NSA directives:


    Step 1: Put drive on anvil and pound on it w/8-pound sledgehammer until no piece of the media is bigger than a quarter.


    Step 2: Collect pieces, and slag in gas-fired incinerator.

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  275. Here you go: by bmalnad · · Score: 0

    Don't try this indoors: 1. Get steel bucket (trash can will work) 2. fill half way with diesel fuel 3. drop disk in bucket 4. cover eyebrows 5. light match

    --
    Free Scotland!
  276. Secure Deletion Device by Sproggit · · Score: 1

    I am busy designing a standalone deletion device as we speak (IDE & Ultra - SCSI .. cos thats what I got)

    Watch this space.

    Sproggg

  277. Ashes to Ashes, Dust to Dust by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do what governments do. Grind the HDs to dust (metalic and otherwise). Then store the dust. My recomendation is to melt the grindings down and turn them into paperweights for the office. No chance of a lawsuit if, for some reason, an HD doesn't get wiped.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  278. This is MUCH better than any shotgun by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    What you really need is something that can reduce a washing machine to thumb sized chunks in little more than a minute. Check out these hungry machines. SSI

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:This is MUCH better than any shotgun by hesiod · · Score: 1

      That is SOOOO cool. I want one just after seeing it eat up a dozen whole computers with no problem.

  279. Grinding by Billygoatz · · Score: 1


    The British Secert Service grinds their Hard drives into dust,

    puts it into a bin with other hard drive victims.

    And is kept in a locked room, never to see the sweet light of day.

  280. Seems excessive by Aumaden · · Score: 1
    Unless you expect your end users to be pulling out forensic analysis tools, a simple reformat should suffice.

    Now, if you're actually disposing of the disks that's a different story. Wiping will be fine for that, unless the drive is already unusable. Then you'll need to go the physical destruction route.

    If you were dealing with extremely sensitive data (missile launch codes, biowarfare research, etc) then physical destruction would be your only choice.

  281. Curie Temperature Toaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just heat the drive above the Curie temperature. No special software or external electronics are required. I use an old toaster oven and it works great.

  282. Wouldn't work on journaled FS by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

    That wouldn't work on journaled filesystems (like Ext3, ReiserFS and NTFS). Shred works on individual files. Those filesystems will first write data to a new block which then replaces the one previously pointed to by the file. Only the pointer is overwritten. The original data block is still on disk (untill this, now free, block is overwritten again).

    1. Re:Wouldn't work on journaled FS by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      Understood. However shred is not a file management tool, it works at a much lower level in that it's designed to change the state of blocks occupied by the file, not modify a file and rewrite. (If this worked then opening a file deleting the data contained therein and rewriting to the HDD would be sufficient.)

      What you are talking about is the same as hoping that new data written over a file will obscure the old file. Doesn't work. Hence shred and what it does. It works irrespective of the data and works on the blocks assigned to a file called X. We aren't modifying a file so much as we are modifying the magnetic traces that define the file.

      Some links .....

      http://aplawrence.com/Words2005/2005_04_15.html
      http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure _ del.html

      Remember though in the end the only viable way to destroy the data on a drive is either to melt it or to use an industrial grade shredder on the platten. So although you can do a NSA level wipe of the drive (though not NSA approved, there is a difference.) The real experts can still get viable data off of the drive.

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  283. Absolute Deletion by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    I use a two pound sledge hammer. No shit, that is my deletion process 5 good whacks and the platters are exposed another 6 and all thats left are the broken pieces of the platters, if someone can recover data from that they are more than welcome to it.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  284. What about magnetic destruction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in the old days if I wanted to destroy a floppy disk, I'd run a large magnet over it several times and it would be dead.

    A harddrive works by setting the magnetic data on the platters to 0 or 1 using a very small head and magnetic charge.

    How hard would it be to build a box that produces a very large magnetic field that destroys all the magnetic data?

    Oh wait, already done:

    http://www.spectrumwest.com/Attach2.htm

    And yes, they do recommend the sledgehammer mentioned above.

  285. Better Living Through Chemistry by rjune · · Score: 1

    I propose a more elegant solution. Purchase some hydrochloric acid. You can find this with the pool chemicals (37% aqueous HCl) or try some muriatic acid in the home improvement section. Pour the acid into a bowl (wearing safety goggles and gloves, of course) and drop the platter(s) into the acid. Safe and proper disposal is left as an exercise for the reader. On the other hand, using a big hammer and smashing the !@#$%^&* out the platter is a lot more fun.

  286. donating to future archaeologists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After a short and simple wipe, I pry up the corners of the cover and drop it off edge of the continental shelf.


    Two million years from now my porn stash will be viewed as a religious icon. Too cool.

  287. Preferred destruction methods by raider_red · · Score: 1

    I usually stick with using either an AR-15 or a M1911 for disposing of hard drives. YMMV depending on your aim.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  288. That's what we do... by Omega · · Score: 1

    At the company I work for (a large-ish company you've probably heard of), we don't return any dead drives. If a drive is non-functioning, the platters get incinerated and the rest is recycled.

  289. Sounds like a job... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    ...for a microcontroller. Seriously, get a Microchip PIC, wire up the ATA connector, and write some simple C code to handle reading the disk geometry and then blasting the data (over and over and over)...

    The hardware costs could be as little as $10 or so per device, and it would be not much larger than the ATA connector!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  290. shameful self-promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a company that makes a storage security system that's designed to meet precisely this need (and encrypting tape backups, and other stuff). Encrypt everything before it touches the disk, and if there comes a time when you want/need all of the data on the disk destroyed, just wipe the key. (That's a pretty simplified description, but close enough.) We even already have a medial data storage facility as one of our customers.

    I'm going to try to save some face and not say exactly who we are, but we're one of these:
    http://nwc.compliancepipeline.com/shared/a rticle/p rintablePipelineArticle.jhtml?articleId=160502579
    (I think there's going to be an extraneous space in that URL that will have to be removed for it to work.)

  291. Build a machine! by JThundley · · Score: 1

    Build a regular machine yourself to do it! Make it boot a very minimal Linux to a script that automatically wipes any other drives it can find. Use this.

    Or just make that floppy and stick it in the computer with the faulty drive. It's no-nonsense.

  292. Re:Old HDD with weird little symbol ... by zulunappy · · Score: 1

    It was where it is in the world that I always found weird. It is not like we have an American Air base around. Maybe they get sold second hand on the used semi sensitive device market :)

  293. An On Topic Answer..... OMG!!! by lifespan · · Score: 0
    I don't think this fellow is looking for a critique on software methods. He's just asking about people's preferred software and how they implement a wiping box.
    • buy a cheap P3 microatx
    • get pci cards for firewire, USB2, ATA, SATA and a multi-format SCSCI card
    • run data & power cables for each type to outside of box
    • label cables as it might not always be you using the box
    • Install OS + wiping software
    • batch a job with your software to wipe E on boot then shutdown after playing an alert


    Now you can just sit the victim on top of the computer, hook up the appropriate data/power cables and turn it on. When the music plays you can step away from the job you're on and you've saved a pittance of time for your boss YAY! grumble grumble....

    If the drive doesn't work, burn it with all the plastic and styrofoam the storeman couldn't fit in the bin.... ;)

    --
    -- Howto: Get +5 (1) Whine about M$ (2) Namedrop Gentoo (3) Casually Abuse Mods (4) Namedrop Early Computer Model
  294. Encryption from the start would help by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    Hardware encryption which runs transparently between the controller and the hard drive has been availible for a while now. Nothing on the drive is in plaintext, not even the boot sector, and without the key it won't work.

    Put the disk on a machine without the encryption system and key and you get gibberish which you will take from now until the end of the sun's expected lifespan to figure out.

    Add software encryption loaders at boot and then OS loading encryption on top of that and finally file level encryption with PGP and what was what is never going to be figured out. If this is on Windows and it crashes, you'll never recover anything. I'm not sure if you can get an image off the drive in its encrypted form and have to do backups from the running decrypting state and encrypt back-ups separately as far as back-ups are concerned.

    Do a simple random overwrite once booted and no one will ever recover enough of anything to decrypt through the layers even if they have some Star Trek-ish futuristic technology.

    Problem solved. If the data is that sensitive in the first place, it should have transparent hardware encryption in the first place at the very least. I don't understand why so much data is kept in plaintext from the start and no thought given to this portion of the problem from the start.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)