Slashdot Mirror


Hong Kong Boy Scouts to Protect IP

phresno writes "Declan McCullagh at C|net's News.com has a short article on the development that the Hong Kong Boy Scouts Association has teamed up with the MPA to create an intellectual property merit badge. Mike Ellis of the MPA hopes this program will 'provide thousands of young people -- future leaders -- with a better understanding of the value of intellectual property.' Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."

617 comments

  1. Hong Kong Piracy by Excen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just me, or is Hong Kong the perfect place for the MPAA to start brainwashing the youngest members of our society?

    --
    "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    1. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Har, har. It's insane what passes for "funny" around here now.

      It's obvious they're doing it because of the rampant piracy in HK. The goal is to have kids that are ordinarily buying warez at small shops turn in the owners instead. Except even if they do, the shops will open up a week later under a different name, two doors down, and run by the same guys. Are all the guys running these places in sham shui po and mong kok going to go out of business? Hardly.

    2. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      START?!?!? For those of us who grew up in the tin foil hat crowd, the Boy Scouts were corrupted long ago- this is just putting that corruption to a new use.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, Hong Kong is the perfect place to earn your "The Ruling Party is Not to be Questioned" merit badge.

      They could issue that one in this country pretty soon.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by bird603568 · · Score: 0

      I dont know what Boy Scouts your talking about but there is no IP merit badge. I just recieved eagle and that wasn't on the list (recieved it with in the last week). As far as being crupted that horse shit. The liberial media likes to blow thing out of propotions. So they do shit like this and the pedifile, the anti gay and anti atheist. They just want to get ride of people with morals. as for IP it sucks

    5. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by over_exposed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Was there a spelling merit badge?

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    6. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      "Corrupted" in this case means being fine, upstanding, law abiding peons and slaves to the corporations.

      IP merit badge or not- the Boy Scouts have been the very model of training young boys to become fine upstanding "citizens" to our corporate oligarchy for 150 years now- no matter which country they are in. An IP Merit Badge fits that stereotype so well that I'm actually suprised that Hong Kong is the first country to think of it.

      It's a point of view (alternate universe) problem in reality- if you're a moral relativist, then shaping young men to be steadfast and moral is indeed corrupting them.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I must have completely missed the corporate oligarchy part. I learned how to tie knots, and do first aid.

      What kind of Boy Scout troop were YOU in?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by say · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      IP merit badge or not- the Boy Scouts have been the very model of training young boys to become fine upstanding "citizens" to our corporate oligarchy for 150 years now

      And let's not forget the racist/fascist training which suddenly stopped in 1945.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    9. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are a number of documented cases of local Boy Scout councils inflating their numbers, sometimes inventing entire fictional troops, so that they can get more money from groups like the United Way. If that's not corruption, I'm not sure what is.

      I also made Eagle (not to mention Vigil Honor, District Award of Merit, etc.), and I worked for my local council for several years. I've seen some of that corruption first hand. The council routinely discriminated in its hiring practices, fired people who spoke up about problems, and covered some things up in an accident where a camper was left paralyzed.

      As a former BSA employee whom I respect immensely put it, Scouting is one of the best programs you can find for young people to be part of, but the organization itself is about as corrupt as they get.

    10. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, I must have completely missed the corporate oligarchy part. I learned how to tie knots, and do first aid.

      What, you missed walking little old ladies across the street, being truthfull and upright, and following the law (the last of which was written by the corporate oligarchy for their own interests)?

      What kind of Boy Scout troop were YOU in?

      Maybe an overly moral one- but I'm talking more about stereotypes than reality anyway.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Its also under a 100 years not over 150.

      Depends on the country you're in- English Scouts were the first I think.

      Alos your word doesnt matter because your a commy.

      Exactly my point- corrupted by the corporate oligarchy to do their bidding. Though I'm begining to think that the corporate oligarchy is more like those in the Kremlin than they want to admit. After all- communism in the Soviet Union was just a few con artists using the dream of Marx to steal money for a small minority- just as Wall Street uses the dream of getting rich to steal money from rubes who think they are "investing" it to provide a lavish lifestyle for a small minority.

      So what if you call me a fascist it still better bering a facsist than a rusky.

      Incorrect- like Marx himself, I'm a moralist.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It stopped at all? My Boy Scout Troop in the 1970s was all lily white, and still had the overpriced copyrighted uniforms...

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by daishin · · Score: 1

      Well, Hong Kong is the perfect place to earn your "The Ruling Party is Not to be Questioned" merit badge.

      Well, if I recall correctly Hong Kong is in China but virtually free of influence from the rest of China. It has its own legal system, and is not like the totalitarian China we hear about. Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong#Legal_Syste m_and_Judiciary

      --
      (\_/)
      (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
      (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
    14. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by cerberus4696 · · Score: 1

      Someone should remember to mention that to the government of the One China.

    15. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by syousef · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or is Hong Kong the perfect place for the MPAA to start brainwashing the youngest members of our society?

      Whaaaat? I thought child abuse was illegal even in Hong Kong!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    16. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by trumpetboy8282 · · Score: 1

      English Scouting is only a few years older than the Boy Scouts of America and is still under 100 years old.

      --
      This sig is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.
    17. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by pbaer · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been in boy scouts? What you stated is the common stereotype of how boy scouts appear to others. Reaslistically boy scouts are some of the most fucked up people you will ever meet. I have not met a single one who was a not a perv (molestor), pyro or a knife phreak myself included. Anything they do that aids the community isn't because they want to improve their community but because they need to do that for a badge, particularly eagle scout. Granted there are probably some altruistic people in it that are sincere but I haven't met any. I quit because the people in boy scouts are too fucked up after changing troops 3 times. It does teach good knot tying and wilderness survival skills but morals? Pfft

      --
      There are 11 types of people, those who know unary and those who don't.
    18. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      You joined the wrong group of Boy Scouts. I remember long games of tackle smear the queer and being body checked into the wall of bushes that surrounded the lawn of our meeting place. Camping trips usually involved someone getting seriously burned, falling into a ice covered stream, or a game of rock wars ending badly. Property damage happened often and our troop was banned from a couple convience stores.

      I learned in my years as a boy scout if you ratted someone out you would pay later and keep your friends close but your enemies closer. So Boy Scouts did pretty much prepare me for life.

    19. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by say · · Score: 1

      FLAMEBAIT my ass. The scouts were definitely racist, and in many countries fascist, in the 1930s. That is heavily documented, and anyone with an interest for the history of fascism would know. Flamebait would be OK if I claimed that they still are...

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    20. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by dual_boot_brain · · Score: 1
      learned in my years as a boy scout if you ratted someone out you would pay later and keep your friends close but your enemies closer. So Boy Scouts did pretty much prepare me for life.
      So which New Jersey troop were you in?
      --
      There is no reset button in life; however, there are bonus levels.
    21. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by dual_boot_brain · · Score: 1

      Stop reading Wiki and start thinking for yourself.

      --
      There is no reset button in life; however, there are bonus levels.
    22. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I was a cub scout for all of two years- then my family hit a poor stretch and we could no longer afford the uniforms.

      All the scout troops in Oregon are sponsored by churches- and have a tendency to teach the morals of those churches. There were plenty of altruistic people around me- if you could call it that. I did notice that the grand majority of what they teach moral wise is not to upset the status quo....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I remember long games of tackle smear the queer and being body checked into the wall of bushes that surrounded the lawn of our meeting place.

      Exactly- standard 1950s morality training. Why do you think they call it "smear the queer" anyway? It's using violence to enforce the heterosexual status quo.

      I learned in my years as a boy scout if you ratted someone out you would pay later and keep your friends close but your enemies closer. So Boy Scouts did pretty much prepare me for life.

      Sounds like standard corporate morality to me....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    24. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      First the game "smear the queer" has been around a bit longer than the usuage of "queer" to represent someone's sexual identity.
      See Queer and educate yourself

      Second I lived in a small town in Idaho and "corporate" lifestyle isn't really big. Think of a bunch of farm boys rough housing and just generally getting in trouble. There is something to be said about loyalty and trust between a group of people. It was always the good of the group before the good of the individual.

    25. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If you haven't figured it out:
      1. Wikipedia is shared ignorance- it's as much about myth as reality because individual users who THINK they know something can edit the entries.
      2. Corporations came from exactly that ideal- putting the good of the group ahead of the good of the individual- just like communism.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    26. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Jormundgandr · · Score: 1

      Wrong! Next please.

      (90% of everything is pirated in big Chinese cities)

      --
      -sig removed for tax purposes-
    27. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Jormundgandr · · Score: 1

      You are the god of trolls. I salute you.

      --
      -sig removed for tax purposes-
    28. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Right next to the usless cooments about spelling one..

      --
    29. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      he scouts were definitely racist, and in many countries fascist, in the 1930s. That is heavily documented

      And so was planned parenthood, your post was flamebait because it was put up there for no other reason than to offend. PP gets a pass on its history but the scouts are always dragged through the mud because they dont get into the post modern humanist game..

      --
    30. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by leecn · · Score: 1

      Watch out!
      The post modern humanists are coming to get you. You broken record.

    31. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      I am a borken record, youre the one who follows me around and offers nothing of substance for your effort.... pathetic...

      --
    32. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by leecn · · Score: 1

      I will admit that I read most of your comments. I really shouldn't, because I just get annoyed at your ignorance and hypocrisy, and then I end up writing some comment about what a wanker you are :-)

  2. Children by fembots · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny how you can still make use of children if you hit the right note.

    1. Re:Children by dfn5 · · Score: 1
      How is this flamebait? This statement is insightful, not inciteful.

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  3. Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by rewinn · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about a GPL Merit Badge?

    1. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      How about a fellatio merit badge? I think that would really teach those young boys a useful lesson about life.

      -Michael Ja^H^H^H^H^H^HJohn Doe

    2. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh...Why is this funny?
      (Yes, I get the joke and yes, funny.)

      Frankly, it's a great suggestion. I'd love to have America's youth thinking good things like the Mantra of GPL, instead of bad things like "...let's keep all the good things to ourselves and make some moolah or shut out the little guy"...

      --
      "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
    3. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by PaxTech · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about a GPL Merit Badge?

      You have to make the badge yourself, but you do get the use of patterns and yarn donated by the community.

      Of course, then there will inevitably be articles written criticizing you for putting people out of work in the seamstress industry..

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    4. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd like to propose the "Cleaning Out Spyware and Installing Firefox" badge :)

    5. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Watch out! Robert Baden-Powell, founder of the Boy Scouts, is alledged to have been a closeted homo and/or paedophile! Now if we can just drag in the Apple fanbois for the flamefest, this could be a slashdot perfect storm!


      Quote:

      Two modern biographers of Baden-Powell consider him to have been a repressed homosexual, Michael Rosenthal of Columbia University and Tim Jeal. Tim Jeal's work, researched over the span of five years, was published by Yale University Press and well reviewed by the New York Times, the Washington Post and other publications of record.

      Along with many other pieces of evidence for his contention, Jeal mentions as illustrative an episode which ocurred in November of 1919. While on a vist to Charterhouse, his old public school, he stayed with an old friend, A. H. Tod, a bachelor teacher and housemaster who had taken large numbers of nude photographs of his pupils as part of a photographic record of public school life. Baden-Powell's diary entry about his stay reads: "Stayed with Tod. Tod's photos of naked boys and trees. Excellent." In a subsequent communication to Tod regarding starting up a Scout troop at the school, Baden-Powell mentions his impending return visit and adds: "Possibly I might get a further look at those wonderful photographs of yours." Tod's pictures of nude boys survived until the 1960's, when they were destroyed in order to "protect Tod's reputation." We are told, however (by R. Jenkyns), that the album contained nude boys in poses which were "contrived and artificial." Though today such a thing may raise suspicions, seen in the light of those days these would not have been at all unusual. We have no reason to suspect that Tod's relations were anything but chaste, and his pictures were rather in keeping with the contemporary tradition of male homoerotic art exemplified by Henry Scott Tuke's paintings, Baron Wilhelm von Gloeden's photography, and others.

      Jeal also mentions that Baden-Powell ". . . consistently praised the male body when naked and denigrated the female. At Gilwell Park, the Scouts' camping ground in Epping Forest, he always enjoyed watching the boys swimming naked, and would sometimes chat with them after they had just 'stripped off.'" (Personal communications between Jeal and old scouts)

      Despite his appreciation for the beauty of young boys, Baden-Powell seems never to have acted on his suspected attraction with any of the boys, and was adamant about the need to restrain the sexual impulse, especially in his communications with boys. He incorporated a graphic prohibition against masturbation in early scouting manuals (so graphic that Cox, his printer, refused to run the presses till the mention was watered down), and into his eighties carried on correspondences with individual scouts exhorting them to control their urge for "self-abuse." He subscribed to the commonly held turn-of-the-century opinon that the practice led to disease, madness and sexual impotence. His views were not shared by all. Dr. F. W. W. Griffin, editor of The Scouter, wrote in 1930 in a book for Rover Scouts that the temptation to masturbate was "a quite natural stage of development" and steered scouts to a text by H. Havelock Ellis that held that "the effort to achieve complete abstinence was a very serious error." (Tim Jeal, Baden-Powell: Founder of the Boy Scouts 1989, pp. 93-94)

    6. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by lowid+(24)+_________ · · Score: 1

      What about a peer to peer merit badge? Or even just a warez merit badge, really. After all, if boy scouts can learn to build a fire without matches, they ought to be able to obtain software and music without money.

      Other good alternatives would be a Home Recording merit badge, Encryption Circumvention merit badge, Leaked-DVD-Screener merit badge, Telesyncing merit badge, Console Modding merit badge, or the ever-popular Hold Down the Shift Key merit badge.

      P.

    7. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Because the Badge may be incompatible with the BSD license badge , not to mention some other Badges from Sun .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    8. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Someone will write a script to do it, so all the user has to do is type make badge.

      (Not so far-fetched, actually; there are computer-controlled sewing machines that can do embroidery out there)

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    9. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by wankledot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that last statement describes America quite well.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    10. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think people would appreciate a badge with a hammer and a sickle on it. :)

    11. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      I think I earned that one a long time ago.

      Of course, that might have been after I turned 18, so it might not count.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    12. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me be the first to say, "We don't need no stinking badges!"

    13. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      And the "I'd love to have America's youth thinking good things like the Mantra" describes Europe quite well. The difference between moralists on the Right and moralists on the Left is which morality they want to compel you to adopt.

    14. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by torokun · · Score: 1

      How about a GPL Merit Badge?

      How about a communist Merit Badge? ;)

    15. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Flendon · · Score: 1

      How about the not typing in 133t merit badge. That would be a good lesson for them to learn.

      --
      chown -R us ./base
    16. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Flendon · · Score: 1

      How about a GPL Merit Badge?

      Great idea! It would of course have the GNU Head as the picture. Maybe more appropriate would be a Copyleft symbol so as to include all open projects.

      --
      chown -R us ./base
    17. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, every time you abuse a boy scout ... God kills a kitten.

      Think of the kittens.

    18. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, then there will inevitably be articles written criticizing you for putting people out of work in the seamstress industry..
      Only after you put it in the magic machine that makes infinite copies without requiring any additional materials
    19. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by abuthemagician · · Score: 1

      make badge I laughed so hard at this everyone is now staring at me...

  4. OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or Hitler Youth, maybe?

    1. Re:OMFG by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

      The American Legion Boys State was formed for the expressed purpose of countering communist youth groups in the (IIRC) 40's. When I went, my friends called it the Corrupt Democratic Regimme. One lecture featured the looser of the NJ Gubernatorial race, Jim McGreedy. He explained to us his stance on flag burning was this: "When I was young, my father told me, 'Jim, flag burning is wrong.' That's how I know flag buring is wrong."

    2. Re:OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when I went to Boys State, a high ranking state government official bragged about how he ratted out and fired homosexuals who were working in state government and encouraged us to do the same. He got quite a standing ovation.

    3. Re:OMFG by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "Jim McGreedy" Did you mean Jim McGreevey? He actually was the governor. Given his recent coming out of the closet, I doubt the BSA would want much to do with him now.

    4. Re:OMFG by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

      Oops, Freudian slip there. I know he was the governor, I've lived in NJ all my life. I used that identifier to give an idea of when this was, the summer after he lost to the re-election campaign of Christie Whitless^H^H^H^Hman

    5. Re:OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That is so ironic because the only time I've ever burned an American flag was in Boy Scouts. Very cerimonial. About 500 scouts at Camp Cherry Valley, Catalina Island.

      Seriously. I was taught that it is disrespectful to allow the flag to touch the ground...even when disposing of it. So when a flag is old and worn you don't simply throw it away, you burn it out of respect.

    6. Re:OMFG by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      As a former member of both, I can tell you that Boy's State is not the same as the Boy Scouts.

      Regardless, you're pretty spot-on. Boy's State is a brainwashing joke of an exprience, complete with marching in formation and "classes" taught by half-wit legal scholars to explain their theories of how a flag burning amendment would fit into the Constitution.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    7. Re:OMFG by KevinKnSC · · Score: 1
      The "Flag Code" says something to the effect that when a flag is no longer fit for display it should be destroyed respectfully, preferably by burning.

      People who are against flag burning aren't against respectful-retiring-burning, they're against "UnAmerican"-protest-burning. That's just harder to say.

      (Disclaimer: I am not in favor of criminalizing flag burning of either kind)

    8. Re:OMFG by brontus3927 · · Score: 1
      Likewise, but the grandparent referenced Hitler Youth, and I was just pointing out that our own Hitler Youth currently exists in the guise of Boys State.

      The really sad part is that most of the attendees bought it as a valid argument and started a petition tosend to the state Senate in support of a flag burning amendment. And then I was chased across the campus by a mob rabid at my refusal to sign said petition.

      Of course, I was also written up during that week for NOT WEARING A BELT. After that, it was recommended to me to study the rules. I did, and checked them off as I systematically broke them in spite (hey, I was 17)

    9. Re:OMFG by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

      The perfect American.... question the rules and leaders. YOU GO!

  5. This is sick by Saven+Marek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me be one of the first to say this is absolutely sickening. Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that. Not about serving commercial interests.

    What next they have a McDonalds Merit Badge given to the kids who can eat a quarter pounder a day all week for supporting a good old american company? Well it means the same thing.

    1. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What next they have a McDonalds Merit Badge given to the kids who can eat a quarter pounder a day all week for supporting a good old american company?

      I hope so. I could sure use the additional "quadruple-bypass-survivor" merit badge.

    2. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just about to abuse you for being a typical american by mentioning McDonalds in reference to hong kong boy scouts. Then I read the article and see it's American influence ("Hollywood creates Boy Scout merit badge on copyright") in the original story. I wonder how the US government would feel if a foreign interest came and supported a US Boy Scout badge.

    3. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:This is sick by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Badges sometimes have sponsors though. My cooking badge is sponsored by Flora, and home safety by Prudential Insurance (Or someone, I can't be bothered fishing out my camp blanket).

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    5. Re:This is sick by ChaosCube · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and you get your merit badge faster for saying "Supersize Me" when ordering your food.

      --
      BDR Gear
      Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
    6. Re:This is sick by stevew · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and ..."

      Think about this for a second. Whether you like it or not, MPAA DOES have some legitimate gripes. How they go about resolving those issues isn't nice, but theft is still theft.

      Getting Boy Scouts (of whatever nation) to honor someone else's property is well within the concept of "doing the right thing" in my book!

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    7. Re:This is sick by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Let me be one of the first to say this is absolutely sickening. Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that. Not about serving commercial interests."
      Frankly I guess I am confused. Is pirating and right? I thought that the main complaint with the RIAA was with there tactics, destruction of the princeable of fair use, and just general nastyness. I mean the FSF uses the very same IP laws to go after people that break the GPL. Are they just as evil since they go after violators of their IP as does the RIAA?
      I really thought it was about keeping your rights to privacy not piracy.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight.

      Not stealing others' creations has nothing to do with being honorable, or doing the right thing? I'm not following.

    9. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      uhm... and piping up when you see someone breaking the law / stealing from someone is not an honorable thing to do?

    10. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that...

      Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?

      There are much, much bigger problems with this pseudo-military youth group than RIAA merit badges. They deserve neither our respect nor our money.

    11. Re:This is sick by Enigma_Man · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right. It's too bad that instead of just keeping to "Please don't copy this music to other folks, thanks" they tack on the "also, pay us more if you want this in other formats, mwahahaha" bit.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    12. Re:This is sick by PaxTech · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather see the *AA spending money trying to convince people that piracy is wrong than to see them spending money trying to convince politicians to put people in jail for it.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    13. Re:This is sick by caino59 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very true.

      Being an assitant scoutmaster (and eagle scout) - I'm very interested in seeing what this merit badge entails.

      Respect for others ideas and creations is good.

      However, the extortion that the RIAA and MPAA are engaging in is terrible.

    14. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can "care" all they want, the Boy Scouts is a private organization.

    15. Re: This is sick by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
      I hope so. I could sure use the additional "quadruple-bypass-survivor" merit badge.

      Hey! How nice to see you visiting Slashdot, Mr. Clinton.

    16. Re:This is sick by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Since it's a social organization and has nothing to do with the government, I'd suppose theyd feel about the same that a pope in Italy is the religious leader of a large segment of the American people. They wouldn't care. It has nothing to do with government. If the Boy Scouts want to have a silly badge, well so what? It won't be the first silly thing they've done. Get over it.

    17. Re:This is sick by brontus3927 · · Score: 4, Informative
      With the exception of maybe 5% (2% who earn the rank of Eagle, and maybe 3% who care but aren't able to make it that far) of Boy Scouts, scouting is about being in a social club. There are over 100 merit badges, maybe 2 dozen relate to the core of scouting. The rest are things that started out as an opportunity to educate young people on technologies (like Computers and atomic energy), become horribly out of date because there isn't enough interest in updating them, and scouts (if they can find a leader certified to sign off on that badge) getting them to have a longer list of badges. When I was a scout in the 90's, my troop (which was an Eagle generating powerhouse, averaging 2/year in a troop with a membership ~30) more than half of the merit badges didn't have anyone qualified to teach them. I went to a jamboree to get my Computers merit badge, and the book had images of an Apple IIG!

      Below are the requirements for the Computers Merit Badge which was "updated" a few years ago:

      1. Give a short history of computers. Describe the major parts of a computer system. Give four different uses of computers.
      2. Do the following:
        1. Tell what a program is and how it is developed.
        2. Give three examples of programming languages and what types of programming they are used for.
        3. Describe a source program and an object program.
      3. Show how the following may be stored in computer memory: text, numbers, pictures, and sound.
      4. Do THREE of the following:
        1. Use a database manager to create a troop roster, providing name, rank, patrol, and telephone number of each Scout. Sort the register by rank, by patrol, and alphabetically by name.
        2. Use a spreadsheet program to develop a weekend campout food budget for your patrol.
        3. Use a word processor to write a letter to parents of your troop's Scouts, inviting them to a court of honor. Use the mail merge feature to make a personalized copy of the letter for each family.
        4. Use a computer graphics program to design and draw a campsite plan for your troop.
      5. Do TWO of the following:
        1. Visit a business or industry that uses computers. Study what the computer accomplishes and be prepared to discuss what you observed.
        2. Use a computer attached to a local area network or equipped with a modem to connect to a computer network or bulletin-board service such as Prodigy, CompuServe, or America Online. Send a message to someone on the network or download a program or file from the network.
        3. Use a general-purpose programming language to write a program application of your choice, subject to approval by your counselor.
      6. Be prepared to discuss several terms used in each of the following categories:
        1. Input/output devices
        2. Storage media
        3. Memory
        4. Processors and coprocessors
        5. Modems
        6. Networks
        7. Electronic mail
        8. Robotics
      7. Be prepared to discuss various jobs in the computer field.
      8. Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?
      9. Describe several ways in which you and your family could use a personal computer other than for games and recreation.
    18. Re:This is sick by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?

      Excluding homosexuals is the new and "acceptable" racism but them excluding atheists isn't surprising...

      The BSA is traditionally quite religion oriented ("do my duty to God..." and all that) and many faiths offer religion awards (which are difficult to obtain I might add). Hell, most BSA troops are sponsored by Churchs!

      In the Troop that I belonged to we had a kid that was an atheist. They kept their mouths shut about it and the son eventually earned Eagle shortly after I did. Big deal.

      In an organization that is based on relgion, hosted in relgious buildings, and says you should believe in some sort of God (doesn't matter which) you can be happy just playing along. If you want to stir the pot they have every right to shun you.

      Don't like it? Don't join up and start your own organization.

    19. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's dangerous to use the *AA or **AA... don't forget, the GNAA would fit in that category.

    20. Re:This is sick by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that.

      Copyright infringement is illegal; upholding the law is both right and honourable.

    21. Re:This is sick by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      download a program or file from the network

      So, to get the Computers Merit Badge, you have to give up all hope of getting the IP Merit Badge?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    22. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't like it? Don't join up and start your own organization.

      Don't like it? Make sure your government isn't donating money or resources to this religious anti-gay organization.

      Many cities did before the Boy Scouts argued in court that discrimination against gays was fundamental to the organization.

    23. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?
      If you're a moral relativist, the concepts of honor and good are meaningless. If you aren't, then you have to be willing to acknowledge that at least from their perspective then what they are doing is precisely honorable and good. Seems to me that you disagree with their view of morality, nothing more.
      There are much, much bigger problems with this pseudo-military youth group than RIAA merit badges. They deserve neither our respect nor our money.
      Fair enough. Feel free to donate to whatever orgs you do feel are honorable and respectable.
    24. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you in spirit. However, there are a lot of people who believe, as their ancestors have for hundreds of years, that you will BURN IN HELL FOREVER if you do not accept Jesus, or if you commit sodomy or whatever. What can you do about this - historical perspective helps me tolerate, at least in theory, the Fundies.

      The sickening part about this, is that it is indoctrination about something which has practically no emotional value at all YET. There is no hundreds of years of religious indoctrination behind the Bono Copyright Extension or the DMCA - it's just come into being, through modern corruption.

      This is like a new kind of ridiculous intolerance being hatched before our eyes - just as a few hundred years ago, when anti-sodomites .. "revised" .. parts of the Bible and other texts to bolster their interpretation, we're seeing some of the first global attempts at pushing a view wherein speech is property.

      I suppose my point is, that I agree that being anti-gay and anti-atheist is ridiculous. However, it's just sad to watch a Big Organization promote yet another Moral Rule while not making ANY reasonable attempts at all to consider the other side. Sad, but perhaps predictable.

    25. Re:This is sick by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      Would you look into a Phillip Morris merit badge? Then why these crooks?

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    26. Re:This is sick by netruner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before I get started, I need to say that I have had a college course that extensively covered IP issues and also was an Eagle Scout.

      The thing that I find problematic about this is that the adult world hasn't figured out how much creedence to give IP rights, yet the group in question appears to be indoctrinating the youth. Understanding that Scouting in other countries can work differently, the core values should remain the same. I seem to remember something in scouting about being an upstanding, law-abiding citizen- so maybe it's not a total sell-out. It's entirely possible that the merit badge covers what is legal/illegal and not ethical/unethcal by corporate standards.

      My final thought: We adults need to get our story straight before we start teaching the next generation what is right and wrong.

      --



      DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    27. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      theft is still theft.

      Right, but copyright violation isn't theft any more that it is piracy. You can try in your Orwellian way to rename it, but the law hasn't changed yet.

    28. Re:This is sick by garcia · · Score: 1

      Don't like it? Make sure your government isn't donating money or resources to this religious anti-gay organization.

      I'd start with the Federal Government before I'd bother w/the BSA.

    29. Re:This is sick by goldspider · · Score: 4, Informative
      May I be the first to say "GET BENT!" With that off my chest, might I refer you to our Bill of Rights.

      Specifically: "...or the right of the people peaceably to assemble"

      The Boy Scouts, or any private group for that matter, may exclude whomever they so choose, for any reason. This particular group does not believe that homosexuality or atheism are acceptable lifestyles.

      Who are YOU to impose your beliefs upon them? Isn't that the very thing you people are fond of accusing 'conservative' groups of doing?

      It is petty of you to deride an organization that first and foremost encourages community volunteerism and service. It is best that people like you don't associate with the Boy Scouts; your involvement would taint their good work.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    30. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't mention the atomic energy badge without linking to this wonderful story.

    31. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?

      You know, there are people who think that anti-religious groups and gay activists using the power of government to demonize and persecute the the Boy Scouts and related groups is just as repugnant. The group was founded with a particular charter and a stated set of values. Blasting them for not accepting those who fail to share those values, and will not even attempt to live according to the standards of the organization, is pretty damn stupid.

      If you don't agree - tell me, do you think an association of atheists dedicated to the idea that religion is a dangerous delusion should (or even could) accept an evangelistic Southern Baptist pastor who wanted to join? Do you think that your local gay rights group would - or should - accept any and all who want to be members, including members of a local gang that are openly and violently anti-homosexual? Or can you admit that private groups, even ones you may disagree with, have the right to set their own standards for membership, and the right to exclude from membership those who fail to meet those standards?

    32. Re:This is sick by NixLuver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, that's only if you buy the propaganda of the corporate weasles that have turned "copyright infringement" into "theft"; not equivalent concepts at all. The reason it was called 'copyright' is because - get this weird concept - it granted you sole right to profit from copying of the work for a limited period of time, which is very clearly different from 'ownership'. Remedies were all civil until our 'copyright' and 'trademark' process got turned into "Intellectual Property" by the lobbyists of the "IP companies" - those who would found an empire on a single concept rather than develop new ones often enough to stay afloat.

    33. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's my right when they use government subsidies, meet at public schools, and use public funds. They can do anything they like as soon as they stop all those things.

    34. Re:This is sick by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Below are the requirements for the Computers Merit Badge which was "updated" a few years ago:
      ...
      connect to a computer network or bulletin-board service such as Prodigy, CompuServe, or America Online.

      Prodigy? CompuServe? I think they may want to consider yet another update.

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    35. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This particular group does not believe that homosexuality or atheism are acceptable lifestyles.

      Atheism isn't a "lifestyle" any more than a-easter-bunnyism is.

    36. Re:This is sick by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 1

      And what exactly should be the requirements? Being able to hack the linux kernel? Design a network infrastructure for a corporation of 5,000 employees including file servers, database servers, e-mail servers, etc.?

      Remeber, we're not talking a degree program in CS here, we're talking about 11 to 13 year olds knowing a few basic facts about computers.

      When I was a Scout and I got my (e.g.) music badge, I was not required to write a symphony that could be mistaken for Bach or Beethoven, nor was I required to qualify for employment with a professional symphony orchestra.

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    37. Re:This is sick by mkro · · Score: 1
      The Boy Scouts, or any private group for that matter, may exclude whomever they so choose, for any reason. This particular group does not believe that homosexuality or atheism are acceptable lifestyles. Who are YOU to impose your beliefs upon them? Isn't that the very thing you people are fond of accusing 'conservative' groups of doing?
      That means you would also defend their right to exclude blacks if they wanted that? Or someone with a physical handicap, like being in a wheelchair? Or is that different? How?
      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    38. Re:This is sick by Tassach · · Score: 3, Informative
      MPAA DOES have some legitimate gripes
      I don't consider "our business model has been made obsolete by technology" to be a legitimate gripe.

      "Intellectual Property" is a legal fiction, created with the explicit purpose of encouraging progress in the arts and sciences. In the days before costless electronic duplication, granting a temporary legal monopoly on a work was a good strategy to achieve this end. However, modern technology has called into question the validity of this definition of "property". It's legitimate to challenge the notion that a particular combination of words, sounds, and images can be owned for all eternity (even if eternity is purchased on an installment plan).

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    39. Re:This is sick by ggvaidya · · Score: 3, Funny

      "quadruple-bypass-survivor" merit badge.

      Pish, the really cool one is the "performed-quadruple-bypass-while-in-the-middle-of -a-jungle-with-a-pocket-knife-two-centimetres-of-r ubber-tubing-and-a-duct-tape" badge!

      (But what do I know, I'm still working on my "stupid-bloody-program-compiles-and-maybe-just-may be-WORKS-dag-nab-it" badge :| ...)

    40. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm sure that's just killing you inside. Run along and find something worthwhile at which to direct your hatred.

    41. Re:This is sick by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By this rationale, the United States wouldn't exist. The Boston Tea Party was blatantly illegal. There is an obvious difference between "real properties" and so-called "Intellectual Properties" - so much so that our Founding fathers debated as to whether they should even be allowed, or must be required. Teach those kids the whole story - like the fact that most bands OWE MONEY to the company that distributes their first three cds, and that they only make MONEY on TOURS, and I think you'll see a completely different perspective from those kids.
      I am really tired of the rampant 'corporatization' of the common perception of 'copyright'. It (copyright) is *not* ownership, and no one was confused about that until Disney and the *AA started spending big cash on lobbying Washington; and now we're exporting our brain-damaged brand of "Intellectual Properties" via economic blackmail.

    42. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen!, on behalf of my troop, troop 15, i am discusted.

    43. Re:This is sick by mpcooke3 · · Score: 1

      sure.

      Although, some kind of merit award in being able to recognise detrimental international monopolies and illegal price fixing groups, would also be useful in my book!

      And some kind of award for recognising commercial interest lobby groups, dodgy legislation and for uncovering widespread IP extortion and blackmail by said groups.

      Oh now, wait, THEY'RE JUST KIDS.

    44. Re:This is sick by goldspider · · Score: 0

      I would personally be less supportive of them if they chose that route (and personally I don't see why they would exclude any civic-minded youth, regardless of race, religion, orientation, etc.), but AFAIK the organization is within their rights to do so.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    45. Re:This is sick by Tassach · · Score: 2, Insightful
      upholding the law is both right and honourable.
      Upholding an unjust law is neither right nor honourable; disobeying such a law is both.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    46. Re:This is sick by da+cog · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that...

      Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?

      Suppose the situation were turned around, and the local Atheism Club turned down a Boy Scout for membership because he was religious. Should the Boy Scout feel "excluded"? Of course not! It's perfectly acceptable for an organization of people to form around a shared value and to only allow in people who share that value. There's nothing dishonorable or mean about this.

      Also, homosexuals are not "excluded" out of bigotry, as your post seems to imply. It's partly a value thing, as with Atheism, and its partly to assure parents that their children are going to be in a situation where no one will have sexual feelings for them and vice versa. The Boy Scouts don't think that homosexuals are bad people at all -- they just disagree with the behavior. Don't confuse these two things.

      Besides, this is generally a nonissue. There's an unofficial policy of "Don't ask, don't tell." Even if you are an atheist or a homosexual, if you don't make a big deal out of it nobody's going to care. If you say, "Hey everyone, I'm an atheist and I insist on being a Boy Scout anyways!" then of course they have no choice but to not allow you in, but I don't think that most troops work particularly hard to enforce that rule unless someone forces the issue.

      There are much, much bigger problems with this pseudo-military youth group than RIAA merit badges. They deserve neither our respect nor our money.

      Boy Scouts is not really pseudo-military -- at least, my troop wasn't at all, but every troop is different. It's much more like an outdoors club that strives to teach leadership skills and the value of accomplishment (e.g. merit badges, etc.), both of which are very respectable things to have.

      --
      Snarkiness is inversely proportional to wisdom because it emphasizes feeling right rather than being right.
    47. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would personally be less supportive of them if they chose that route

      You'd only be less supportive? That's pretty fucked up. Do you support the KKK for their fantastic parades, even though there's all that "other stuff"?

      The BSA is at least partially supported by government money - mines and yours. They should have to live up standards that don't exclude for reasons like race, religion, and sexual preference.

    48. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the boy scouts was about being a bigotted shill for the christian right...

    49. Re:This is sick by replicant108 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting Boy Scouts (of whatever nation) to honor someone else's property etc etc

      "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property."

      http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/ a1_8_8s12.html

    50. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you still get your badge if the file you downloaded was porn?

      "But our scout master has the same picture on HIS laptop!"

    51. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Popular culture expert, huh?

    52. Re:This is sick by yincrash · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed that China is letting them do this. I'm aware Hong Kong gets things it has had since before reaquiring it, but promoting intellectual property rights is like poison for China.

    53. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, I'm sure that's just killing you inside. Run along and find something worthwhile at which to direct your hatred.

      +5 Ironic

    54. Re:This is sick by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      adult world hasn't figured out how much creedence to give IP rights

      What? It's completely unambiguous, and there are very clear-cut laws on the books. You Cannot Rip People Off - what haven't we figured out about that?

      What you probably mean to say is that the part of the population that doesn't like to pay entertainers for their work haven't yet brainwashed enough eventual voters into thinking that they have an entitlement to free movies and music, and thus we haven't yet changed the laws to make it so. Right now it's unambiguously illegal to rip off the artists, and the only variable is the number of people that think it should be OK. The good news (for the artists) is that the people that are too lazy to be able to afford to pay for their entertainment are also, generally, too intellectually lazy to even go through the motions of justifying piracy in terms that the rest of the productive economy will endorse.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    55. Re:This is sick by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Adults have it straight. The law is quite clear (in the US at least) about every act of copying and whether it is infringing or not. You might be ignorant of the law, but that doesn't mean the law doesn't apply.

      What bothers me most is that most of the people who argue about copyright and say things like, "the RIAA's business model has been destroyed by the internet" etc... most of those people don't give a rat's ass about copyright law, they just want free stuff. That's not activism, that's being a greedy asshole... if you want activism, try *giving something up*, and maybe people will give you a little respect.

      "Yes, I'm protesting the lack of SUV pollution controls by stealing, then selling, every Ford Explorer I come across. Sure I've made thousands of dollars for free, but it's a protest!"

    56. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting Boy Scouts (of whatever nation) to honor someone else's property is well within the concept of "doing the right thing" in my book!

      Of course they should respect your property.
      So called "IP" is NOT property, nor is it
      in any way 'intellectual'. If you could
      think of it, so could someone else. Half the
      time, someone else has already thought of it, but you just hope that you have a
      better lawyer.

      All that should matter is who puts it to use
      first
      in a product. Patent the product, fine.
      No product? No protection.

      Patenting or copyrighting ideas is as silly
      as me patenting the use of the letters A, E, I
      and U for the creation of 'words'.

    57. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Suppose the situation were turned around, and the local Atheism Club turned down a Boy Scout for membership because he was religious. Should the Boy Scout feel "excluded"? Of course not! It's perfectly acceptable for an organization of people to form around a shared value and to only allow in people who share that value. There's nothing dishonorable or mean about this.

      I happen to run a local Atheists organization, and we welcome all comers. But if I got money from the US government, or was meeting in publically owned building, I'd have to make damn sure I was open to everyone. I can choose to exclude, but if I'm getting any public help, like the BSA does, my responabilities change.

    58. Re:This is sick by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where did he say they don't have the right to exclude gays?
      Where did he say they had to be forced to include gays? HE DIDN'T.

      All he did is to point out that they are a group of bigoted, homophobic assholes. They have the RIGHT to be bigoted hompophobic assholes, and he has the right to point to them and say "Hey look! A bunch of bigoted homophobic assholes!"

      Why are YOU to impose your beliefs on the parent poster and tell him he has no right to point out that he thinks a group is doing something he considers immoral?

      He is not a hypocrite - the boy scouts are saying homosexuality is bad, the parent poster is saying the boy scouts are bad. You, on the other hand, are implying not just that the parent posters beliefs are bad in your opinion, but that he has no right to express them... the irony and hypocricy of your own statement clearly eludes you.

      --
      This space available.
    59. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Popular culture expert, huh?

      Absolutely. I majored in it in college.

    60. Re:This is sick by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I think it's Just. Who the hell are you, and why should YOU determine what's Just or not in the nation? Especially when we already have a well-established method called "The Law" designed to solve that exact problem?

    61. Re:This is sick by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      Who are YOU to impose your beliefs upon them?
      I am their financer. The boyscouts are partially funded by the feds. Untill they stop accepting federal money, or I stop paying $30K a year in taxes, I am entitled to try to impose just about whatever I want on them.

      BBH

    62. Re:This is sick by bleckywelcky · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, they don't use public resources as much as you may think.

      I was in a scout troop when I was young and had friends in other scout troops. All of our troops used private churches to meet in.

      I recall one scout troop that did use a local elementary school gym for their meetings. However, it is still within their right to exclude gays and atheists from joining their club. If a gay or atheist wanted to walk into the gym, the troop wouldn't force them out (unless of course they were being ridiculous, yelling and screaming or something). If a gay or atheist group wanted to use the gym, they could sign up just like everyone else. Yet, they can exclude straight and religious people from their groups.

      Public resources don't mean that you have to be completely PC when you use those resources. They are just available to the public. If an equestrian club wants to use a public park, but won't allow anyone to join that doesn't have a horse, should they be banned from using that public resource?

      And governmnet subsidies and public funds don't really make their way into the scouts anyhow. Pretty much all of the organization is run by volunteers, scouts pay dues to run their troops. Everyone pays for their own supplies, scout uniforms, scout books, etc. Camping supplies are paid for through fundraisers by the troops. They may take grants for specific projects though, ie: if a grant existed to clean up some wetlands, they might take on that project. But the goal of the grant is to clean up the wetlands, it doesn't care who does it. So the scouts will achieve that goal.

      If you have any facts to back up your claims, I'd like to see them.

    63. Re:This is sick by minvaren · · Score: 1

      "Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?"

      Sounds like they've got the RIAA/MPAA's concerns covered already. Why did they need a new merit badge again?

      --
      Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
    64. Re:This is sick by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      but theft is still theft.

      problem is, we don't all agree that downloading music IS theft.

      we have to agree on that before you can start calling someone a thief.

      the MPAA and RIAA already have gone to the conclusion that IP infringement is 'theft'.

      if you buy into that, you have given away a decision (and right) that you should not have, so quickly.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    65. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I think a private organization should be free to exclude anyone for any reason, even illogical or outright despicable reasons. I can see no compelling interest of the state to regulate such things. However, the courts don't quite see it that way.

      The Supreme Court's decisions regarding "freedom of association" are largely based on freedom of speech. It would violate the organization's rights, as well as those of its members, to force it to admit anyone who disagreed with its principles. That means that a group can exclude whoever it wants as long as the exclusion is based on some principle the group expresses. In the case of the gay Scoutmaster, it came down to the question of whether decrying homosexuality was a central part of the organization.

      To answer your question, yes, it is different. Can the Boy Scouts of America exclude blacks or disabled people? No. Can the (fictional, I hope) People Against Wheelchair Ramps And Desegregation do so? Yes.

    66. Re:This is sick by KI0PX · · Score: 1
      I think you are confused about the difference between legality and morality. The two often do not intersect.

      Yes, as a private organization, the Boy Scouts have (and should have) the legal right to exclude whomever they so choose, for any reason. This was decided in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale in 2000. I agree with the Supreme Court's decision.

      The parent did not say that the Boy Scouts should be legally forced to include homosexuals or athiests. He questioned the morality, not the legality, of the BSA's stance. I agree with the parent; for an organization that claims to stand for our country's values, it is extremely hypocritical to blindly discriminate based upon religion, gender and sexual orientation. In fact it might be those youth who need the program the most.

      I am an Eagle Scout and Assistant Scoutmaster of a Scout troop. I am an atheist (and about 25% agnostic) and so far I haven't been booted. Occasionally I am vocal about my stance. I expect that some day they will kick me out, but until then, I will fight for the moral position of no discrimination in Scouting. I will also fight for the legal position of the Scouts' right to discriminate. See the difference?

      Some would say that I have no right to play any part in the program, or that I should start up my own Boy Scouts (with gambling and hookers, etc). The thing is, I hate to see such a good thing go to waste; Boy Scouts was an integral part of my childhood, and I want to salvage it as much as possible.

    67. Re:This is sick by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Listen to what you're suggesting; you're comparing the Boy Scouts to the KKK. Let's keep things in perspective, please.

      You want me to say that the Boy Scouts aren't perfect? Fine, they're not perfect. But from my point of view, the positives they contribute far outweigh their shortcomings.

      If you actually knew anything about the Boy Scouts, you'd know that they are a bit more than a "psuedo-military youth group". I know it's easy to lash out at something you don't understand, but try to be a little open-minded.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    68. Re:This is sick by caino59 · · Score: 1

      Because pending what is involved with the badge - it may be a good badge.

      If it promotes moral standards and doesn't soley support the **AA initiative.

      For me - that would be not only information regarding the protection of IP, but also information regarding Fair Use.

      Bad/Incomplete analogy.

      If Phillip Morris were to work with the Scouts on a merit badge promoting healthy habits - then I would not have a problem. However, I think you are trying to infer that Philip Morris would somehow try to push smoking on the Scouts.

      That's why I'm interested in the badge - I didn't say I was going to immeadiately adopt it without question. However, it does merit (no pun intended) a look as to the validity of the badge to see which way the MPAA went in the subject.

      If, like I think you were trying to allude to, this badge was clearly biased, I would reject it and attempt to get any and all others to do the same.

    69. Re:This is sick by TerminaMorte · · Score: 1

      As an atheist who was in the Boy Scouts for several years, I think this a bit misleading.

      It's not that This particular group does not believe that homosexuality or atheism are acceptable lifestyles. so much as that they believe religion plays an important part in a persons development.

    70. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a question of is copy right infringement illegal, the question is what is infringement?

      Example, should the person who invented the wheel/disc reap monetary gain from every item created that uses a wheeled/disc structure?

      And when you purchase this wheel/disc what rights do I have to use it as I please. When I buy a car can I let someone else use it, or am I the only one that has purchased right to use it?

      In the case of digital media, can I give my CD away, or the song I purchased, so long as I don't profit from it?

      In short, the clear cut direction the MPAA or RIAA is trying to claim is pretty much B.S. and it's really not about what's right or wrong but a question of who can get the most powerful attorney generally it's a corporation, so by default they generally have more money to make themselves "right and honourable" in the eyes of the law, not that what they are saying actually happens to be more right or honourable.

    71. Re:This is sick by goldspider · · Score: 1

      A good point; perhaps I was less irritated by the GP's argument than by it's hateful delivery.

      I (also an Eagle Scout) too see room for improvement in the organization, but it's far from the 'hate group' that some people here make it out to be.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    72. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep bringing up the federal money thing. Hasn't it occurred to you that your beef should be with the federal government instead of the Scouts? I don't know if the government really supports the BSA financially or not, but it's rather clear that the Supreme Court favors them on the issues you're upset about. Instead of railing against the Scouts, your effort would be better spent lobbying your elected officials. I can't figure out what you hope to accomplish in this series of diatribes, honestly.

    73. Re:This is sick by CharonIDRONES · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      Here on /. it isn't 'theft', its 'copyright infringement'.

      -Brandon

    74. Re:This is sick by plsander · · Score: 1

      When I ran the Computers merit badge for a group of scouts last month, I covered requirement 8 "Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not? " by talking about Copyright and the various licenses that can be used.

      That Copyright is the temporary control that an author has over their work. The author can be out for the money (Closed source, like Microsoft) or out to be helpful (GPL and Open source, like Linux)... does not hurt that one of the points of the Scout Law is "Helpful"...

      I ran the practical parts of the merit badge on Linux - a mix of Debian, Red Hat, and Knoppix.

    75. Re:This is sick by Tezkah · · Score: 1

      Yeah they didn't kick a guy out for being an atheist, not at all.

      You just didn't have the courage to stand up and not swear something you don't believe in, or you would have been kicked out.

      "Any organization could profit from a 10-year-old member with enough strength of character to refuse to swear falsely."

    76. Re:This is sick by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
      ... those who would found an empire on a single concept rather than develop new ones often enough to stay afloat.

      It also says a little something about the average consumer. Consumers could put the kibosh on this rather fast if they stopped paying money for the same regurgitated crap day after day. Perhaps if consumers demanded more new, original material consistently then corporation would actually be motivated to produce it. We get remake after remake, remix after remix, tired concept after tired concept because the vast majority of consumers are stupid enough to keep paying over and over for the same "repackaged" concept.

    77. Re:This is sick by brontus3927 · · Score: 1
      Well, since the purpose here is learning, maybe some things that the scouts could already do (and probably had done) before cracking the book. There's a bit more to computers that kids can learn beyond knowing the names of the components, how to use word proccessing, spreadsheet, and "a local area network"

      Maybe soem more discussion on the principles of networking, more about processors than simply what they are, maybe x86 vs PowerPC, Celeron/Sempron vs Pentium/Athlon, AMD vs Intel, talk about servers vs workstations, demonstrate a knowledge of the major differences between Windows & Linux, Proprietary vs Open Source. A good requirement would be to:

      Do ONE of the following:

      1)Using a catalog or the internet, compare prices on two seperate computers. Compare trade-offs between price and relative performance.
      Or
      2)Build a computer from components. These may be purchased or supplied to the troop.

      While many won't have the financial resources for part 2, part 1 requires as little as a free BestBuy circular.

    78. Re:This is sick by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should look up the definitions of bigot and homophobe. As for being a malcontent, I would think that term applies more to those who ACTIVELY try to suppress those with whom they disagree, like the boy scouts... rather than those who merely express their opinion.

      --
      This space available.
    79. Re:This is sick by serutan · · Score: 1

      Wow, I was never a Scout, but the computer badge requirements doesn't seem too shabby to me. I mean I wouldn't expect that you'd have to write a graphics driver or anything.

    80. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also an Eagle Scout, and I am also Atheist (and have been since I was ~15 years old)

      However, I do not now (nor will I ever) be a scoutmaster while their official policy is that of discrimination, and prejudice.

      What we have is an organization claiming to have a strong moral base that is immortal and is all about spreading hatred and discrimination. They will not recieve a penny of my money or a minute of my time until they change their ways.

      They have the right to be biggoted assholes all they want, and I support that right... but more and more people are starting to see boyscouts as place a spread hatred.

      Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, curtious, kind, obident, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent is the boyscouts of yesterday.

      Today's BSA is more about hatred, homophobia, and religious discrimination. Quite frankly this country would be a better place if we woke up tommorrow and the BSA no longer existed.

    81. Re:This is sick by TyfStar · · Score: 1

      you know, while I do agree that stealing is stealing, I am getting pretty damn tired of the RIAA & MPAA just taking over on their moral high horse. For 20+ years now, the world has blamed them for increased violence and turning society into degeneratees. Now suddenly they say "it isn't right to steal.. don't do it... from us."

      Sorry kiddies, it's really just irony.

      I've stopped being able to watch The Disney Channel ever since "The Proud Family" had an episode where the little girl was downloading music illegally. I couldn't even watch the end of the episode, I was so sickened.

      (Kinda' depressed.. that means no more Kim Possible.)

      (And no, I am not 12. I'm 27 with a 5 year old. )

      --

      "There is a reason Linux is free"

      ~me~

    82. Re:This is sick by toxickiwi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link Uncle Sam, but you can't be serious... here is some information that you might not be aware of, Boy Scouts is an international organization, and that link means sweet FA around the world.

    83. Re:This is sick by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      Fair enough. Although I was attempting to be more derisive than insightful, I am assuming they'll follow the same approach they did with the crap they pushed in the schoolrooms:

      Students Playing the Starving Artist

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    84. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - it granted you sole right to profit from copying of the work for a limited period of time, which is very clearly different from 'ownership'. Remedies were all civil until our 'copyright' and 'trademark' process got turned into "Intellectual Property" by the lobbyists of the "IP companies" - those who would found an empire on a single concept rather than develop new ones often enough to stay afloat.

      YES. And THATS why its THEFT now.

      Dear christ, if I hear one more idiot fanboy yell "its not theft!"

    85. Re:This is sick by grumpyman · · Score: 1
      I'm totally missing what's in the mind-set of like-minded slashdotters. On one hand people are pounding on HK (and other SE Asia countries) saying it's a pirate heaven and the government is doing shit about it. And now people are pounding them for teaching kids to value IP.

      I am endorsing the use of such badge, nor saying commerical business should do things like this. Here you are trying to equate 'valuing IP' and 'serving commercial interests'.

    86. Re:This is sick by natrius · · Score: 1, Insightful

      However, modern technology has called into question the validity of this definition of "property".

      Who are you kidding? Technology didn't call into question the validity of intellectual property, human nature did. What happened is that it's so easy to disregard the laws that protect intellectual property that tons of people do it. This makes sense. Intellectual property has no basis in natural law, and as a result, most people don't feel bad about downloading music off the Internet. The notion of intellectual property conflicts with something inside each of us that sees nothing wrong with making a copy of something we already have and giving it to someone else.

      What you don't seem to realize is that intellectual property was created for the sole purpose of giving content creation a viable business model. If you're the only one who is allowed to make copies of the work you create, you can sell those copies for money. Otherwise, it's infinitely harder to create content as a career. No one wants that. We want all this content to still be created so we can enjoy it.

      If anything, advances in technology have proven that intellectual property is necessary for a vibrant creative industry. Since it's so easy to copy things now, everyone does it. There need to be artificial barriers in place, such as intellectual property law, to make sure people don't do that. It's easy to tell the creative industries to come up with a new business model, but that has two problems. First of all, people are still taking their content without paying for it. This leaves them no incentive to keep on putting out albums. That's bad. Secondly, no one has suggested a viable alternative business model. One model that is frequently suggested is that artists would distribute their albums for free as an advertisement for concerts and merchandise. What this fails to take into account are the artists that already sell out tours with the current model. All you're doing is taking away an avenue for the artist to make money and claiming that it's a better business model. This also ignores other creative works, such as books and visual art. The people who create these works derive most, if not all of thir income from the sale of their works. If their works start being distributed online as widely as music currently is, there won't be an alternative business model to turn to at all.

      If people continue to disregard intellectual property law, the business models that the creative industries use will change. However, the industries as a whole will have to change as well, and this will likely result in far lower production of creative works. That's exactly what intellectual property law is there to prevent. Sure, copyright duration is too long, along with various other problems. The solution is to fix the problems, not get rid of it all together. Intellectual property rights are rights that we give to creators as a society, and we can just as easily take them away. I don't think it's wise to do so.

    87. Re:This is sick by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      The BSA is at least partially supported by government money - mines and yours. They should have to live up standards that don't exclude for reasons like race, religion, and sexual preference.

      Er.. Actually, it isn't. The BSA does not get one red cent of funding from the federal government. Maybe in grants to do something, but not as general funding. The troops are entirely self financed.

      As for excluding people based on race and religion? They do not exclude based on race, and the only troops that are allowed to deny based on religion are the mormon troops. But that is because the churches have all their boys join the troop. They're large enough as is.

      That leaves sexual preference. The only way that the troops do exclude. That comes down to the scouts being a religious organization (of many relgions, not just one). With most of the religions believing that being gay is a sin. Nothing you can do about that.

      But, back to the money, none of yours is paying for the troops to operate. As for mine, well, I'm a scoutmaster. So some of mine is. Don't want to support the scouts? Don't buy anything from their fundraisers and don't donate any money. But the scouts don't get any money from the governments unless it's for a job they do.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    88. Re:This is sick by deanj · · Score: 1

      No offense, but that argument is going no where.

      Under current law, copyright violations are a crime.
      Period.

      Just saying "it's not a crime" won't float if you're in court.

      If you don't like the law, lobby to change it. Don't use lame arguments.

    89. Re:This is sick by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      "8. Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?"

      That one could cause a few problems for me
      I would say it is perfectly permissable to give a copy of a game to a freind. I don't know many people who havn't at one time got a copy of a game from their mates or vice-versa. I think its fairly well coverd by fair use ,under most resonible legal systems that is.

      Other people will have the opinion that its wrong to do so .

      ? Are these question ala university question ,for example .. so long as you can back up your belife it is correct .
      If not then i would fairly say that it could lead to a few qualms.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    90. Re:This is sick by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      The BSA does not get any money from the gov for doing nothing. They may get it for grants for things they do, such as cleaning up an area, but anyone can get those. As for using the public buildings, there are no requirements on who can and can not request to use a building. And generally, you PAY for it.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    91. Re:This is sick by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      fantastic. Blame the consumer. Like my 'Aunt Betty' who is fascinated by the fact that the disc (CD/DVD) goes in, goes out, goes in again...

      Yeah, consumer pc users *surely* should be out there _demanding_ the newest in physics, chemical and biological enhancements to their current raft of toys.

      And they obviously use 100% of the feature set of Quicken Deluxe so are *well positioned* to impress upon Intuit just where their rather laggard engineers have got it wrong.

      sigh.

      surely you must be a mouthpiece for the RIAA...

    92. Re:This is sick by KI0PX · · Score: 1

      Today's BSA is more about hatred, homophobia, and religious discrimination. Quite frankly this country would be a better place if we woke up tommorrow and the BSA no longer existed.



      I would not say that at all. On a local level - at the troop level, it's not about discrimination. It's about camping and having fun and canoeing and leadership. There's just a few crusty old conservatives in Texas who run the organization who made a bad decision for everybody. If people would stand up and disagree, we just might change it. And that would be a Good Thing.

    93. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out Scouting for All's website at http://www.scoutingforall.org/packtroop/index.shtm l - lots of good information on the subject.

    94. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Atheists aren't allowed in scouting - that's excluding people based on their religious beliefs (or lack thereof).

      Maybe you should check out http://www.scoutingforall.org/packtroop/index.shtm l - lots of my money in there too...

    95. Re:This is sick by deanj · · Score: 1

      Well, considering a lot (NOT ALL) gay and lesbian organizations bash the living shit out of Christians, I wouldn't go around bashing like that. There's plenty of bashing to go around.

      Until both sides stop this crap and figure out a way to meet in the middle, this will never end.

    96. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say it's not a crime.

      He said it's not theft.

      Theft may be a crime, but theft is not the only crime.

    97. Re:This is sick by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      so much so that our Founding fathers debated as to whether they should even be allowed, or must be required

      Well, if not for copyright, how would the creators of easily-copyable things make any money from producing them? Bands can tour, sell T-shirts, etc, programmers can create custom modifications, sell support, etc, but authors?

      most bands OWE MONEY to the company that distributes their first three cds

      Seems to me then that most bands are stupid, at least where money and contracts are concerned. It also seems to me that your authorities ought to be investigating the RIAA for anti-competitive and unfair business practices. Neither of those things have anything to do with copyright though.


      I am really tired of the rampant 'corporatization' of the common perception of 'copyright'. It (copyright) is *not* ownership, and no one was confused about that until Disney and the *AA started spending big cash on lobbying Washington; and now we're exporting our brain-damaged brand of "Intellectual Properties" via economic blackmail.


      Now that I can agree with you about. Copyright law is fundamentally a good thing, in my opinion, but your corporations are threatening to ruin it for everyone in their greed.

    98. Re:This is sick by NixLuver · · Score: 1

      'Dear christ, if I hear one more idiot fanboy yell "its not theft!"'... "I'll be completely unable to deny just what a whining corporate fanboy I am, just aquiver to take it up the Intellectual Property from Sony!"

    99. Re:This is sick by Surt · · Score: 1

      I remember earning that merit badge back when i was 14. It was pretty intense the first time I did it, but by the time you've done it 3 or 4 times it starts to feel routine.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    100. Re:This is sick by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Dude, if I stopped watching channels every time something I saw sickened me, I might as well sell my TV (which would not be popular with the rest of my family)

    101. Re:This is sick by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      ...but theft is still theft.

      Too bad this has nothing to do with theft then, eh? This is about government enforced monopolies on printing/publishing. Some people believe that these monopolies are in the best interests of the people and promote the arts and strengthen the economy. Others believe they are unjust and stifle progress and criminalize our rightful artistic heritage. One thing, however, is certain... copyright has nothing to do with stealing.

    102. Re:This is sick by NixLuver · · Score: 1

      Good point. I try and turn people on to the cool free music that's available on the net - legally, I might add - but people look at me blankly when they finally comprehend that I'm suggesting that they might enjoy music that's not played on MTV or the local airwaves.

    103. Re:This is sick by Culture · · Score: 1

      What? It's completely unambiguous, and there are very clear-cut laws on the books. You Cannot Speed - what haven't we figured out about that? What you probably mean to say is that the part of the population that doesn't like to obey the speed limits haven't yet brainwashed enough eventual voters into thinking that they have an entitlement to drive as fast as they like, and thus we haven't yet changed the laws to make it so. Right now it's unambiguously illegal to speed, and the only variable is the number of people that think it should be OK. The good news (for the driver who obey the speed limit) is that the people that speed are also, generally, too intellectually lazy to even go through the motions of justifying speeding in terms that the rest of the productive economy will endorse.

      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    104. Re:This is sick by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      1) Hong Kong still has a great deal of independence, Beijing isn't writing all the laws

      2) IPR is "like poison" for China *now* - specifically, *other countries'* IPR is like poison. I very much doubt that China takes the same view towards its own IPR. Just like any developing country, it'll want to do everything it can to give itself a head start, but once it's caught up, it's going to protect its position just as much as the rest of us

    105. Re:This is sick by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

      The Boy Scouts, or any private group for that matter, may exclude whomever they so choose, for any reason. This particular group does not believe that homosexuality or atheism are acceptable lifestyles.

      And thus allowing (or encouraging) your cub scout or boy scout to wear his uniform to school on meeting days (very common practice when I was young) would be sending a pretty direct message to any gay or atheist classmate of his.

      Kind of like sending your kid to school with a swastika armband, or perhaps a while robe with a pointy hood?

      Sure we all have the right to assemble, but Boy Scouts (of America) in many instances goes beyond assembly and broaches affiliation in their relationships with churches, towns, veterans groups, and public schools.

    106. Re:This is sick by NixLuver · · Score: 1
      "Well, if not for copyright, how would..."
      I'm not suggesting copyright should be abandoned, at all; I'm merely pointing out that in spite of the propaganda of Disney and friends, "Intellectual Property" is not 'obvious'; it's a compromise that was intended to support innovation, not stifle it.
      Seems to me that most bands are stupid...
      Hrm... I don't disagree with the sentiment, but I would note that most bands are kids, with little life experience to help them develop the bullshit detectors necessary to see through the slick shills that the "IP Corporations" send after them. It's institutionalized fraud, IMO.
      Now that I can agree with you about...
      I, too, think copyright is a fundamentally good concept; it's the current bastardization I have problems with.
    107. Re:This is sick by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      That's true, but it still doesn't excuse comiting copyright infringement.

    108. Re:This is sick by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      that's excluding people based on their religious beliefs (or lack thereof).

      Sorry, was using the definition that Aethiesm wasn't a religion. But since you say it is, maybe we should start applying seperation of church and state to it as well?

      As for that link, well lets see. Money for chartering/rechartering is provided from dues the scouts pay and fundraising conducted throughout the year. If any of those places that chartered them are giving money, I'd be very surprised. Lets see them actually give more details and then I'll be interested. I have never run into a troop that wasn't chartered through a religious group.

      As for using a cafeteria or fire hall? Any group can use them. They just need to sign up, and the scouts usually pay for them too.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    109. Re:This is sick by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Under current law, copyright violations are a crime.
      Period.


      I was never talking about current LAWS. laws mean very little, when you think about it. in many states, its illegal to have oral sex. should you simply follow all laws even though you don't agree with some of their flawed ideas? robots always do what they're told. humans should THINK.

      at any rate, I was talking about what is RIGHT and WRONG and how we blur the line by bringing interests of corporations into morality and synthesizing laws to suite their needs. any law that exists solely for one corporation's or industry's needs are not any law that I care to respect.

      civil disobediance. it was once a law that you could own slaves and also there were laws that prevented women from voting.

      simply spouting off "its a law!" gets you no credibility in my book.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    110. Re:This is sick by Tristandh · · Score: 1

      Come on, isn't this obvious? The big issue with this is that the the great institution of scouting is being abused, as a tool for 1 branch of industy, that the tradition of badges is being abused for the profit of the recording industry. Not about the right or wrong about piracy.

    111. Re:This is sick by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      What? It's completely unambiguous, and there are very clear-cut laws on the books. You Cannot Speed - what haven't we figured out about that? What you probably mean to say is that the part of the population that doesn't like to obey the speed limits haven't yet brainwashed enough eventual voters into thinking that they have an entitlement to drive as fast as they like, and thus we haven't yet changed the laws to make it so. Right now it's unambiguously illegal to speed, and the only variable is the number of people that think it should be OK. The good news (for the driver who obey the speed limit) is that the people that speed are also, generally, too intellectually lazy to even go through the motions of justifying speeding in terms that the rest of the productive economy will endorse.

      Such fresh, incredible wit!

      Let's see, I'll try again with DBJML (don't be a jackass markup language):

      What? It's completely unambiguous, and there are very clear-cut laws on the books. You Cannot Rip People Off [without waiving your own rights because you choose to violate someone else's, considering the likely consequences to be cheaper than paying for entertainment, and not being worried at all about the actual ethics of doing so] - what haven't we figured out about that?

      What you probably mean to say is that the part of the population that doesn't like to pay entertainers for their work haven't yet brainwashed enough eventual voters into thinking that they have an entitlement to free movies and music, and thus we haven't yet changed the laws to make it so. Right now it's unambiguously illegal to rip off the artists, and the only variable is the number of people that think it should be OK. The good news (for the artists) is that the people that are too lazy to be able to afford to pay for their entertainment are also, generally, too intellectually lazy to even go through the motions of justifying piracy in terms that the rest of the productive economy will endorse.


      Huh. I didn't have to change that very much at all.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    112. Re:This is sick by zotz · · Score: 1

      "but theft is still theft.

      Getting Boy Scouts (of whatever nation) to honor someone else's property is well within the concept of "doing the right thing" in my book!"

      Hello. It is not theft. And, it is not someone else's property.

      It is violation of copyrights, not theft. It is someone's copyright, not someone's property.

      If, for instance, I violate someone's right to free speech, have I stolen their property?

      I would like to see the materials though. Are they fair and even handed?

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    113. Re:This is sick by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to be going out of your way to be inflammatory. Not everyone who complains about draconian IP laws are simply out to score free stuff, and--despite your comments--you know it.

      The laws are not always clear cut, and where they are clear cut, they do not always represent the best interests of fairness, justice, or society as a whole.

      Do you think it's right that a documentary maker loses the right to use a shot because it happened to catch a few seconds of a TV playing "The Simpsons?" Do you really think our society is served by keeping "The Grapes of Wrath" under copyright until 2038? What about the literally millions of copyrighted works that no longer have value to the copyright holder, or for whom the copyright holder can't even be found? Should we make sure those works can't be copied either, until those copies which do remain have crumbled into dust? Should researchers face criminal prosecution merely for discussing the copyright protection measures of a new gadget?

      If these are the sort of fair laws that you want Boy Scouts to be taught to respect and obey, then your endeavor is doomed. Even a twelve year old can see that "IP law" is just a big, corporate-sponsored power grab, and any attempts to teach them to respect those laws will only result in their losing respect for all laws.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    114. Re:This is sick by enjo13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Keep in mind that the Boy Scouts in America are 'honorable' that they forcibly exclude boys for no other reason than being gay.

      Honorable.. hardly.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    115. Re:This is sick by Cracell · · Score: 1

      you don't fit in here

      anyways orignally boy scouts was about honour and helping out the people, but now it's helping out the big businesses like everything else

      the MPAA is evil, we can spend hours and hours debating whether it is or isn't but it always comes out that it is...and boy scouts is now gay.

      --
      Signatures are so 90s
    116. Re:This is sick by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      The use of government money doesn't (in my opinion) matter one bit. They should live up to those standards because its simply the right thing to do. Instead of being another divisive organization in our society.. why not try being what they claim to be?

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    117. Re:This is sick by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      That's why it's dangerous to have unjust laws -- they put people in the situation where they need to start making these decisions, and then more reasonable laws start getting called into question.

      Nevertheless, there are unjust laws. Segregation was unjust, and slavery was unjust. The former was supported by the law for about a century until it began acting sensibly, and the latter took a long and bloody war to get rid of; the law never did.

      This situation is not as extreme, but the general point remains that it is very shortsighted to believe that all laws are just, and that legal authorities will correct unjust laws. To trust them, to just follow orders, as it were, is not an excuse for one's own unjust behavior.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    118. Re:This is sick by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      One model that is frequently suggested is that artists would distribute their albums for free as an advertisement for concerts and merchandise.

      You admittedly pick ONE new model, pick it apart and use that as justification for disregarding all new models.

      How about considering other models that have wider applicability? Such as group contracting - where consumers band together and pool their small sums to contract for the creation and then the end result is released to the public domain?

      Such a work-for-hire model is as applicable to the limerick writer as it is to the $200M blockbuster movie - the only difference is the scale. But just as the internet destroys the current business model by making frictionless wide-scale copying feasible, it can enable such a new business model by making frictionless wide-scale payment pooling feasible.

    119. Re:This is sick by Culture · · Score: 1

      Does this mean I have to post a serious reply? The point is, IP is a right clearly created by society and is supposed to represent a trade-off between the consumer and producer. Most people feel that the system is seriously out-of-wack in favor of the producer. I mean, get real, a patent on lifer saving drugs only last 20 years, but Micky Mouse gets 90? Unfortuntely, $$$ have trampled good sense, and file sharing is partially a result of this. Of course, it is also a partially a result of people not wanting to pay for IP, which is obviously wrong (i.e. imoral & illegal), but is not theft is the traditional sense of the word.

      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    120. Re:This is sick by serutan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      intellectual property was created for the sole purpose of giving content creation a viable business model

      The key word is a small one: "a". The content industry wants everybody to keep thinking "a" viable business model means "the only possible" viable business model. They also want people to keep thinking "representative government" means company lawyers handing pieces of paper to senators to introduce verbatim as laws. When the big kids play dirty it gives the little kids an incentive to follow suit, and to some degree I think it's a reasonable justification.

    121. Re:This is sick by zotz · · Score: 1

      "It's my right when they use government subsidies, meet at public schools, and use public funds. They can do anything they like as soon as they stop all those things."

      This would be a fine argument except that the people normally thought of as holding such a view are also those who are normally thought of as tax and spend liberals.

      So, tax 95% of everyone's income, provide them with what they need to live with and buy up all remaining private land for the government. Now, you can effectively outlaw religion. I doubt that that is what the establishment boys had in mind. If government wa small and limited and only took a small amount of tax, I doubt you would have so many fights about this issue. Apply in this case.

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    122. Re:This is sick by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      It's completely unambiguous, and there are very clear-cut laws on the books.

      Perhaps that is so, in your country.

      That doesn't mean the rest of world has been bludgeoned into agreement by your country.

    123. Re:This is sick by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you probably mean to say is that the part of the population that doesn't like to pay entertainers for their work haven't yet brainwashed enough eventual voters into thinking that they have an entitlement to free movies and music, and thus we haven't yet changed the laws to make it so.

      You can't "rip-off" a dead person by making a copy of their book. If anything I think most authors would prefer that their work was available forever, instead of deleted from history. In any case the author's wishes do not trump the rights of all mankind. Copyright is supposed to be a two-way deal. Author gets a limited term monopoly on publishing, the world gets as many copies as they want in perpetuity. Unfortunately, limited term has become "forever" and works or art, literature, music, film, and even video games are vanishing daily. Gone and destroyed never to be seen or read again, because it is illegal for anyone but one person/group/company to make new copies and they won't or can't or don't even exist anymore.

      Have you ever heard of the book "Solomon's Crown" written by a notorious but anonymous 1950's pulp author? Niether has anyone else. That is because although the book is wonderful it is impossible to get a copy and illegal to make a copy if someone can find it. That applies to about 70% of all blues music in existence. It also applies to the vast majority of video games more than 10 years old.

      How about "It's a Wonderful Life," have you heard of that movie. Well you wouldn't have if the copyright had not expired. It bombed at the box office and was tossed into storage. When the copyright expired PBS aired it and it was instantly a hit. Then through some legal voodoo it became copyrighted again, and PBS has to pay if they want to play it. Now if you haven't noticed nothing has come out of copyright for the last 29 years. All those great works like "It's a Wonderful Life" are just rotting, or thrown out, or in storage, or abandoned all so they don't compete with whatever media companies are pushing today.

      If anyone is being ripped off it is the populace in general who has been robbed of all those works, all that heritage erased and destroyed by greed and corrupt politicians. I've spent years trying to find particular books. They aren't for sale, most can't be found in any library. It used to be any work that was to copyrighted had to have a copy sent to the Library of Congress. That was repealed too. Now there are no copies. And even if their were, most people could not read them, because it would be illegal to make more.

      It's completely unambiguous

      I agree, but I don't think I agree that copyright is moral or ethical right now. In it's current state it is killing our literary and cultural heritage. It is sickening.

    124. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morality is nothing more than a sequence of chemical reactions in the brain that was evolved to facilitate survival.

      It has no place in this argument.

    125. Re:This is sick by guitaristx · · Score: 1

      I remember back in the day, when there was a boycott on tuna. Now, it was my understanding that boycotts actually do something to indicate that consumers want a change in the moral practices of a business.

      Now, considering what we know of boycotts, it would lead me to believe that saying "fsck you, RIAA!" and downloading music illegally is exactly the wrong thing to do if we want to bring down the RIAA, or get them to change their ways, e.g. price fixing, promoting crap music, etc. If the RIAA promotes crap music, why are you downloading it illegally and listening to it? Quit supporting the RIAA by doing without the music that is backed by the RIAA. Quit going to RIAA-backed concerts, quit buying RIAA-backed CDs, and quit downloading RIAA-backed music! Just like people did without their tuna in the '80s, you can suck it up and do without your Metallica. It is not unreasonable to expect the masses to get pissed and start demonstrating a little activism.

      --
      I pity the foo that isn't metasyntactic
    126. Re:This is sick by DJCF · · Score: 1

      Ah, that might not go down to well with the troop leader. You don't wanna be upsetting the powers that be! What I'd say is this:

      "Yeah, of course it's ok to except a free copy of a game or program from a friend. (pause) For example,
      -If my friend wrote the program!
      -If the program or game is a demo, which is supposed to be freely distributed (describes a demo),
      -... and so is shareware (describes shareware)
      -and of course Open Source!
      So, yeah, it's perfectly ok to accept a free copy of a program or game from someone!"

      Abusing the powers-that-be: It's all in how you phrase it mate ;-)

      Daniel

    127. Re:This is sick by halivar · · Score: 1

      Right now it's unambiguously illegal to rip off the artists

      What are you talking about? The RIAA does it every single day. Did you really think those settlements were going to the artists? Silly goose; you've been drinking the corporate Kool-Aid again.

      You Cannot Rip People Off

      Bullshit. I don't pirate music, and I don't copy CD's, but still pay a tax to the RIAA and MPAA for every CD-R and DVD-R I purchase for legitimate use. I want my freaking money back. Are you going to give it to me?

    128. Re:This is sick by iamnotanumber6 · · Score: 1

      What? It's completely unambiguous, and there are very clear-cut laws on the books. You Cannot Rip People Off - what haven't we figured out about that?

      what *some* people haven't figured out yet, is that U.S. laws like the DMCA don't apply to the rest of the world, and that not all forms of copying equate to "ripping off" artists. there are many indications that personal copying between friends, far from hurting the music industry, actually helps sell more music. the riaa/mpaa's repeated attempts to outlaw anything enabling private copying (eg. the cassette recorder and VCR) seem bizarre in light of the obvious economic growth and profits that they have resulted in.

      fortunately, in many countries outside the U.S., the powerful lobbyists haven't yet brainwashed enough voters or bribed enough legislators into thinking that corporations have an entitlement to unlimited control over what people do with music they buy, and thus we haven't yet changed the laws to make it so. right now it's unambiguously legal to share your music with friends and family, and for the most part people think that's just fine. the good news (for the public) is that the arguments of certain zealots trying to justify the application of the term "piracy" to perfectly legal activities (which include the payment of royalty fees to artists via blank-media levies) are too intellectually vapid to endorse, when it is quite clear that these activities are functioning quite well as part of a productive economy.

      allowing a self-serving organization like the MPA to sponsor a boy scout merit badge that tries to persuade children to protect their (the MPA's) "intellectual property" is even more sick than allowing all sorts of other organizations like Coca-Cola, McDonalds, Mattel, and any other group that has a vested financial interest in influencing the attitudes of children to sponsor similar merit badges. at least those companies are honest in that they're trying to sell something, and not promoting their goods under the banner of "justice".

    129. Re:This is sick by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You seem to be going out of your way to be inflammatory.

      No, not really. There's no way, and you know it, that anyone would bother campaigning to give kids some perspective on copyright infringement if it weren't for the huge issue of "scor[ing] free stuff." The concern, and I think it's a very real and legitimate one, is that by not making a stink about that rampant problem, that we're absolutely cultivating a culture of entitlement, especially among younger kids.

      No one is going to suggest that every facet of copyright law is a perfect fit with our evolving economy and society. But the other side of the equation - the wholesale ripping off of material by people who, because there's a fairly low-risk means by which to rip it off, have simply disabled their internal ethical compass - has got to be addressed. The expectation that a movie that just cost someone $100+M to make will now be wildly ripped off, and that a lot of people who would have offset the investment in the movie will now just rip off a copy instead of paying for the entertainment experience - it's hugely impacting the creative business. That documentary filmaker you're worried about is just as able, though a touch less likely, to get ripped off as Peter Jackson is.

      Should an author's family benefit, for a good long time, from his work? Some artists invest years of their lives in works that turn out to have serious impact. They do that work instead of other work that might benefit their family in the near term. So what if we can't find the copyright holder for an obscure work? That being awkward doesn't make Faulkner's work inconsequential to the family or friends to whom he left it. If an author doesn't want to have his work protected, he's got all sorts of ways to waive his rights. Why not simply try to convince creative people to give up their rights, and let those that see the work as a profession and an investment make the decision as they see fit?

      Should we make sure those works can't be copied either, until those copies which do remain have crumbled into dust?

      I don't think you'll find that archivists, libraries, and preservationists are running into lots of trouble with this. You know exactly what this is about: an entire generation that's being trained to think that a the large part of a life's work should be free for the taking, and that there's nothing wrong with making pet entertainment slaves out the very artists they claim to like and respect.

      Should researchers face criminal prosecution merely for discussing the copyright protection measures of a new gadget?

      When the intent of the discussion is clearly to divulge a closely held trade secret, then the intentional damage does come across just like most other intentional damage, yes. But that's exactly what juries are for - to insert rationality into the picture - and it can cut both ways.

      If a few kids can get a dose of critical thinking out of an hour's discussion about whether or not artists are their pets, as opposed to hard working people, then let's hear it for the Boy Scouts (who normally give me the hives, actually). I'm not a big corporation, but I'm sure as hell interested in being able to enforce the terms under which my work is distributed by other people. The real "power grab" in question is the millions of "grabs," every day, that thoughtless twits make for stuff they don't want to pay for. If you really want to make a rational case for softening IP law in some way, then work your ass off, right now, to stop the wholesale piracy that is completely drowning out any other discussion. If you take away the unalterable fact of massive piracy, you set the stage for a more sensible conversation about the subtleties of documentary fair use, the wisdom of estate rights, and so on. But we're talking there about a few cases of academic interest for every million cases of ripped off just-published (or even not yet published!) material.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    130. Re:This is sick by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Well, if not for copyright, how would the creators of easily-copyable things make any money from producing them?

      Well, obviously no one would compete with them on a commercial basis unless there were money to be made at producing the copies. So the mere fact that it's easily reproducable doesn't matter.

      What you really mean is, without copyright how would a person who has sunk costs in creating a thing recoup his investment? As we can see, recouping marginal costs is something pirates are frequently interested in too.

      Of course, being the first to market helps -- pirates take time to gear up and be able to significantly compete with you. Note that for most copyrighted works, virtually all profits that can be made are made within the first few days to months of releasing a work. Only a fraction of profits will ever be recovered, if at all, after that, no matter how long the term is, with only very very rare exceptions.

      Having very low sunk costs also helps. In fact, copyright by no means guarantees that you'll recoup your sunk costs. It offers you an opportunity to do so, provided you can within the time limit provided. If you haven't by then, even under the current system, you're just SOL. So perhaps making a movie that costs $100 million isn't so wise, and you should instead make a movie that costs $100 thousand. That it's a lower budget production isn't a bad thing; $100 million is low compared to $100 billion, but even with copyright where it is, no one dreams of making a movie that expensive. Some works just cost too much. Gonna have to cope with that.

      Value in the copies is also a factor. Shakespeare is in the public domain now. I can download everything he ever did, for free, totally legally. Nevertheless, I went out and bought an expensive hardback copy for about $80, because I liked that particular copy. Pirates might make cheap copies, but perhaps the author could make a nice one, or rely on intangibles such as the author's reputation v. some generic pirate's, so as to attract customers.

      Plus of course, not all costs have to be recovered later. If a group of readers really wanted a particular author to create something, they might offer to pay him. In this case, he's not being paid for the work, per se, but for his labor (which copyright doesn't protect anyway). Pirates avoid sunk costs of this nature, since after all, they're focusing on reproducing other's works. OF course the author is in competition with other authors, and the authors might have similar subject matter (perhaps there is someone out there who can write better Harry Potter novels than JK Rowling, and who could attract her audience). But that's not atypical competition amongst authors anyway. See, e.g. all the cartoons based on the same fairy tales, but Disney's continuing dominance in this field.

      And lastly, authors might take a loss, to some degree. Lots of authors create works without any expectation of financial reward. They have other motivations. As a member of the reading public, I like this, since it means that they're giving away their work, and I like getting stuff for free. Perhaps a lot of it is bad, but Sturgeon's Law applies to everything. That something is commercial doesn't make it good.

      The fact that there were authors prior to the creation of copyright indicates that it's not necessary. It might provide more fertile grounds for them, and thus help produce more authors, and more creative works. But there's always some creation going on.

      The real questions are: how much creation is going on; how much do we want there to be; how much will that cost; and whether it's worth it?

      Personally, I think that copyright, in moderation, is a good idea and socially beneficial. We just have too much of it now, which is bad, and not very beneficial. Reducing but not eliminating copyright could leave everyone better off in the end. The trick is that a few benefit greatly from things as they are now, and while they'd still do okay in a more reasonable system, they wouldn't be doing as well. Thus, they oppose attempts at reform because they are already on top and want to stay there, without anyone else joining them.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    131. Re:This is sick by natrius · · Score: 1

      You admittedly pick ONE new model, pick it apart and use that as justification for disregarding all new models.

      I never said that all of them should be disregarded, just that all have a major flaw: they're far less lucrative than what we currently have, so less creative works will be produced. It was more of an invitation for people to propose other models, which I'm glad you took up.

      How about considering other models that have wider applicability? Such as group contracting - where consumers band together and pool their small sums to contract for the creation and then the end result is released to the public domain?

      If this is really that lucrative of a business model, why aren't more people doing it? The reason is that it's not as profitable as traditional, intellectual property-backed models. With this model, a creator only makes a fixed amount of money, whereas a creator can sell their work for the duration of their copyright (which should be shorter) otherwise. This also makes it much harder for new creators to make money off their work, as getting enough people to fund an unknown artist is extremely difficult. Currently, record labels are the venture capitalists of the music industry. They'll take chances because they can get a return on investment. The model you're proposing yields no return on investment.

      A common thread between many of these proposals is diverting the focus of interest away from the creative work to the creator. I don't care about the creator, and neither does society. What we care about is the creative work they're producing. Contracting doesn't make sense. I don't want to pay someone to create something for me, I want to buy a creation. The effort it takes to shove things into a creator-centric business model is a sign that something isn't right. These models can still be used by people who it works for, but getting rid of intellectual property on the basis of the success of a few would be foolish.

      As I said before, all the proposed alternative business models have one thing in common: less profit for the creator. This means that being a creator is a less lucrative career, so less people do it. Not good. What we want to find is an ideal balance between the rights we reliquish to creators and the benefits society yields from the resulting increase in creative works. I don't think we're there yet either, but the basic notion of intellectual property is a stable foundation on which to build a vibrant creative society.

    132. Re:This is sick by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2, Informative

      You, dear sir, are a complete idiot.

      It is indeed perfectly reasonable to pay ENTERTAINERS for their work. It is not reasonable to pay some bloody cartel which fights tooth-and-claw against any form of distribution medium which they do not control and profit from. Personally, I don't buy CDs, because I think it is wrong for the ENTERTAINERS to get a few pennies out of the twenty dollars I spend to purchase an item that costs all of about five dollars to make and distribute.

      The ENTERTAINERS, at least the ones that aren't owned or owned by major corporations, are thrilled about MP3s and BitTorrent. Why? Because they can finally make their work available to a wide audience in a way never before possible. The technology that exists now allowes authors, musicians, and producers to bring their work to the public, without the requirement of access to a multibillion-dollar private distribution network, because they've got a multibillion-dollar public distribution network -- the Internet.

      ENTERTAINERS who produce quality in this marketplace are rewarded; look at the Ataris, for example. They put up not only MP3s of all their music, but also make the sheet music and gutair tabs available online FOR FREE, and they still sell CDs and T-shirts like mad. Only rather than the RIAA getting the profits, the band, the people ACTUALLY DOING THE ENTERTAINING, are making money.

      The RIAA and MPAA could play in this ballgame, if they were willing to just let people copy; they could still sell at the same price point, and would still make a boatload of cash off the people who are either serious fans, technically illiterate enough to grab the file off of BitTorrent, and people who just want The Theatre or The Concert experience. There is still tons of money to be made, probably more than they make now, if they just played nice with the community.

      The problem is, they don't, and they won't. They have extended copyright to the force of patent law, and made it possible to OWN ideas as if they were property, at least in the 'States, and all so that they can control distribution. So that the MPAA and RIAA can guarantee that You Have Paid, and that You Aren't Stealing Their Art. Copyright was intended so that the author of a work could profit for a limited amount of time; it was never intended to turn art into a commercial industry, yet with the present limits on copyright, art can be nothing but a commercial industry.

      Art does not come from industry. It comes from taking a pile of ideas, mixing them up, and pulling out something that is somehow new and rehashed at the same time. All of the great novels of the world, all of the great paintings, the great symphonies, every piece of art that has stunned mankind has come about only because people had free access to the ideas. All of art copies other art, and without this process, no new art is produced. The process is, in short, evolutionary, and evolution does not work in a system where the copying of ideas, known as variation in this analogy, does not happen.

      The RIAA and MPAA want to own all of Art. They want it packaged, boxed, and unoffensive enough to sell at Wal-Mart. To do this, they must control all distribution, and prevent Those Who Have Not Paid and Those Who Are Not Authorized from being involved in Art as anything more than a passing pursuit. The cartels' quest for money comes at the expense of the ENTERTAINERS, the people producing the art in its myriad forms that we so enjoy, and to claim that this is somehow morally right is a perversion of logic of the highest order.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    133. Re:This is sick by halber_mensch · · Score: 1
      You Cannot Rip People Off - what haven't we figured out about that?
      Here's what we haven't figured out.. well, some people have figured it out, but what they've figured out is how to corner markets. When someone like, say, Cisco has under IP protection an IETF adopted standard protocol, nobody is allowed to implement said protocol without paying Cisco buku licensing dollars - if Cisco even agrees to license it. This leads to a standard that is effectively owned by a proprietary provider that cannot be freely implemented. This is exactly what happened with VRRP. It's a standard! But Cisco owns it! So the free world has to pay up or not use the standard. This is what prompted CARP http://kerneltrap.org/node/1021 to come into existance.

      IP may have originally been intended to encourage scientific development, but these days it is a farce that is abused by moneyholders to fill their coffers. When you can patent the idea of a process, and no one else can implement it, that process is adopted slowly and poorly. Take networking for example. Who uses IPX on the internet? Appletalk? The reason TCP/IP took off is because TCP and IP were open protocols, not because a computer giant had them secured in their Intellectual Property trophy vaults. But the owners of Appletalk and IPX did manage to secure a number of customers in the trap of interoperability.
      --
      perl -e "eval pack(q{H*},join q{},qw{70 72696e74207061636b28717b482a7d2c717b343 637323635363534323533343430617d293b})"
    134. Re:This is sick by stevew · · Score: 1

      If you are depriving someone of income that they are entitled too legally by copying their IP (protected by copyright in this case), then that is theft of potential income.

      As I said. Theft is still theft. Pretty simple concept really - not Orwellian at all.

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    135. Re:This is sick by plover · · Score: 1
      One of the problems of being a merit badge counselor is that while you can TEACH the boys anything about the subject, the requirements for the merit badge are fixed by the BSA until they're updated. As a counselor, you are not permitted to change those requirements.

      The Computers merit badge requirements are always hopelessly out of date at the time of their introduction. The list you have at least removed some of their previous mentions of technology, such as "using a 14,400 bps modem, connect to an online service", or "copy a diskette".

      Merit badge requirements are, like so many other things in scouting, designed by a mostly well-intentioned committee of volunteers. But some members have their pet ideas, and some have their hidden agendas, and most of them are old and retired. As a matter of fact, most are so old that they have no idea what's current in the industry anyway. In the end they produce a mostly functioning document that the rest of us have to complain about for the next 5-10 years.

      This old process works OK for the static merit badges such as "Bugling", or "Camping". But when you start getting into badges with technological components, (think Electronics, or even Bicycling) then currency becomes an issue. Some badges that hadn't changed for dozens of years have recently become almost obsolete due to technological advances: Photography, Electronics, Astronomy, just to name a few.

      There are other pressures on the merit badges, too. Archery has changed dramatically over the years, mostly due to the lack of need -- in the 1930s, young rural boys were fully expected to bring home wild game such as rabbits for dinner, and bows and arrows were commonly available to them. Your demonstrated skills would actually put food on the table. Today, the Fishing merit badge requires only that you prepare a fish, but NOT eat it, recognizing that fish from certain waters contain high levels of toxins.

      --
      John
    136. Re:This is sick by alexo · · Score: 1


      When I saw "Free MacMini!" in your sig, I thought that you were advocating the liberation of the MacMini.

      Imagine my dismay when I learned that it was just a pyramid scheme advertising free-of-charge Mac Minis.

      Damn you to hell, sir, now I will never feel the same about "Free Willy"...

    137. Re:This is sick by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      The author can be out for the money (Closed source, like Microsoft) or out to be helpful (GPL and Open source, like Linux).

      Never forget that RedHat, Suse, etc are all in it at least partly for the money. They're companies, that's why they exist.

    138. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since it's a social organization and has nothing to do with the government

      Arguments in the Dale case aside, that's not entirely true. The Boy Scouts of America have a charter from the U.S. Congress as a patriotic organization, and the President of the United States serves as Honorary President of the BSA.

    139. Re:This is sick by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      ...and about hating homosexuals.

      Who says respecting IP rights isn't what is right? Be more outraged by teaching the children bigotry.

    140. Re:This is sick by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

    141. Re:This is sick by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      He's not deriding them for that. He criticises them, and rightly so, for bigotry and hatred. Whether they have a legal right to exclude others is beside the point. The KKK has a legal right to exclude blacks and jews as well. Hurrah for them.

    142. Re:This is sick by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Who says he doesn't understand and since when is positive contributions and excuse for bigotry and hatred?

      No one or organization is perfect but that doesn't excuse the BSA's hateful position.

    143. Re:This is sick by ifwm · · Score: 1

      If you think that you can make a reasonable argument that Boy Scouts are not a significant contribution to the community, try. I'll listen. I think you'll look silly deriding an organization that is known for walking little old ladies across the street. You hate that they bar gays. Say it and stop hiding behind that "public building" drivel.

    144. Re:This is sick by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      If you are depriving someone of income that they are entitled too legally ...

      Basically it's the "I made it, I am entitled profits off of it whether or not it sucks" attitude I see... Look, last time I looked they were entitled to try and make profits, but unless a legal transaction is taking place, they are not entitled jack shit. They are entitled to control how it is used, but that does not gaurentee income, nore should it. You have to work hard to, IMO.

      As I said. Theft is still theft. Pretty simple concept really - not Orwellian at all.

      And I will say it again, yes it is true, but copying is copying, a philosophical and legal difference important to the integrity of not only law and common sense but something much bigger, the English language. By calling things theft based on what they could have, but don't despite how bady they might whine or cry, you are making a illogical statement used to perpetuate a false idea, which is in fact orwellian like it or not. Look, I agree that copyright ingringement is wrong, except in a few exceptions, but you go far beyond what my morals will allow.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    145. Re:This is sick by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Prove it, don't just say it. Show me facts. You may be correct, but I think you're spouting stuff you've heard others say.

    146. Re:This is sick by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "for an organization that claims to stand for our country's values, it is extremely hypocritical to blindly discriminate based upon religion, gender and sexual orientation"

      With all due respect, this is an idiotic statement. I'm sure you're a bright person, you just fucked this one up.

      This is the country that passed, by a wide margin in most cases, every anti-gay marriage bill that went up. All of them

      The Boy Scouts are exactly consistent with the values of this country.

    147. Re:This is sick by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "broaches affiliation in their relationships with churches, towns, veterans groups, and public schools"

      And it's the responsibility of these groups to refuse to associate with the Scouts if their values don't match. That is the other part of free assembly, the right to NOT associate.

      I'll never get this victim mentality.

    148. Re:This is sick by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "He criticises them, and rightly so, for bigotry and hatred" Ok. This is easily one of the stupidest rants I've seen in a while. Since when does choosing not to associate with someone equate to "bigotry and hatred"? Quite the leap from a to b. I choose not to associate with irrational morons who think that being an intolerant dick on a forum equates to wisdom. It doesn't mean I hate YOU, just that I choose not to associate with YOU. Have a nice day.

    149. Re:This is sick by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      In analyzing official Boy Scouts of America information on 48,430 current Cub Scout Packs and 45,866 current Boy Scout Troops, at least 5,820 (or about 12%) of the Packs and 2,289 (about 5%) of the Troops appear to be chartered (that is, sponsored) by government agencies such as public schools, Police departments, Fire departments, park & recreation departments, and towns.

      While I did agree that there were some public run troops, this obviously shows that the vast majority of them are not. And apparently (according to that website) all public troops are being rechartered as private troops as we speak. So, in effect, the problem no longer exists. Although there are probably a handful of public charters still leftover.

    150. Re:This is sick by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      because I think it is wrong for the ENTERTAINERS to get a few pennies out of the twenty dollars I spend to purchase an item that costs all of about five dollars to make and distribute.

      Well, I usually pay about $12-13 when I buy a CD, and most artists see about .50 to .85 for the many hours I enjoy that CD. Not bad, if they sell 100k of them, on top of other touring income, airplay, and the rest. But I'm not an idiot for thinking that's an OK deal if the artist does, too. And there's the rub: you say you don't like that arrangement, and you say you don't buy the CDs, and we'll assume you don't find (without paying, anyway) some other means by which to lay hands on music by artists that have chosen that arrangement. Because, that's what they have chosen. If you're right about all the money that artists can make by dealing directly with the public, then we're just going to have to wait a little while for the other people to change gears, right? So, why, in the meantime, is it appropriate for so many people to rip these people off?

      Only rather than the RIAA getting the profits, the band, the people ACTUALLY DOING THE ENTERTAINING, are making money.

      This line of thinking is such a hoot. I spent years working with touring acts and live performances from biker bar bands to big, globally popular acts. Over those years I designed and hung lights, humped and operated rigs with half a million bucks worth of sound gear, oversaw the unloading of 40 trailers a night for arena shows, worked crowd control, dealt with concessions people, the t-shirt people, the utilities, the parking people, the facilities management, the cops, the medics, the talent agents, the lawyers, the union reps, the insurance people, the banks, the bus drivers, the talent, and certainly the fans. Unless you're thinking that all of those people (without whom a decent sized concert performance would not take place) should work for free, then you'll admit that the people "doing the entertaining" are not the only ones that see, or should see, all of the proceeds. There are plenty of times when a 5000-seat venue, at $50 per seat (for a quarter-million dollar gross at the door) turns into about $10-15k for the talent (before taxes and a lot of other expenses)... and that's about the money they'd make off CD sales of the same volume.

      The food chain in the studio music business is different, but musicians who go that route use the industry to deal with all of that crap for them, just like the people who fill larger arenas pay people to deal with all of that stuff.

      The RIAA and MPAA want to own all of Art

      Hyperbolic tinfoilish rants don't help your credibility, here. "Those Who Have Not Paid" for a CD aren't a bit different, ethically, than the people that cheat the rest of the concertgoers when they hop a fence and take in that performance they didn't pay for.

      money comes at the expense of the ENTERTAINERS, the people producing the art in its myriad forms that we so enjoy, and to claim that this is somehow morally right is a perversion of logic of the highest order

      If someone who is part of a musician's ability to get their recordings out to a huge audience, and all of the business support people that are part of that picture, right down to the guy that designs the liner notes and the UPS guy that puts those CDs in the hands of the neighborhood Starbucks manager, is making money at the "expense" of an artist, then so is the electrician at the concert venue and the cop that helps protect the cash at the box office. Grow up.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    151. Re:This is sick by NixLuver · · Score: 1

      I understand what you're trying to get at; I simply disagree that copyright infringement necessarily does that. In the past, it was required that the copyright holder demonstrate real damages, ie, a real loss of income. There is a reason that this was required. If I copy your AutoCAD cd, or your Metallica CD, you *still have your cd*. No one has been deprived of anything.( It is this fact that will always and forever divide the reality of "real" property vs "Intellectual Property") And, in addition, the copyright holders have only experienced a loss *if I would have purchased the items had you not given them to me*. This philosophy informed nearly all copyright legislation up to the time that Disney began throwing their muscle ( well, cash ) around in Washington. I don't consider it unreasonable to say that if there were no damages, no damages should be paid. It's only corporate greed that says that one should pay damages where none occurred, or make criminal the dissemination of information. You see, it's 'copyright'; you can't own "intellect". It's not possible; those who believe it to be are ontologically challenged.

    152. Re:This is sick by westyvw · · Score: 1

      Couldnt disagree more. Intelectual property just needs to go away. We cant move forward as a race until we get over this concpet. Will people stop being creative? Doubtful, money or not. But in the current model creativity must yield monatary results, which is, by definition, ruining the creative aspect.

      This model is old and tired, its time to move on.

    153. Re:This is sick by novakreo · · Score: 1

      Until both sides stop this crap and figure out a way to meet in the middle, this will never end.

      Maybe this is what you're looking for?

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    154. Re:This is sick by strikethree · · Score: 1


      Frankly I guess I am confused. Is pirating and right? I thought that the main complaint with the RIAA was with there tactics, destruction of the princeable of fair use, and just general nastyness. I mean the FSF uses the very same IP laws to go after people that break the GPL. Are they just as evil since they go after violators of their IP as does the RIAA?
      I really thought it was about keeping your rights to privacy not piracy.


      i would be sickened if the FSF tried indoctrinating children too. not as sick, since it is not for financial gain, but sick nevertheless.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    155. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of you are looking past the fact that the Boy Scouts of America is a service organization. You do not often see the KKK or any Nazis also encouraging highway clean-up or forest restoration. Please remeber: Whenever you are debating and criticizing you must view both sides while making your opinion. Yes the Boy Scouts of America goes against much of their equality and brotherhood teaching when they exclude certain groups, but that is not why they are an orginization, and yes, when people see a scout uniform they think about what they have done by excluding athiests and homosexuals, but people also see the park that was in utter despair before a now Eagle Scout took it upon himself to repair and restore it.

    156. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as soon as we get over the "money needed to buy food and pay bills" concept, this model is tired and its time to move on.

    157. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scouts shouldn't be downloading pictures of each other.

    158. Re:This is sick by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Public resources don't mean that you have to be completely PC when you use those resources. They are just available to the public.

      Public resources that are open to all can be used by any group. However, resources that aren't open to all can't be used by discrimentory groups. There's a court case about this and the Boy Scouts that got them kicked out of schools in California. That elementary gym probably wasn't open to all; the list of groups that could use it was probably pretty selective, and most groups wouldn't get accepted.

      If a gay or atheist group wanted to use the gym, they could sign up just like everyone else. Yet, they can exclude straight and religious people from their groups.

      Most gay groups don't exclude straight people from their groups. A religious person in a atheist group might be rarer, but very few atheist groups would formally exclude religious people, any more then most churches throw out atheists or other non-believers. Better for them to come and learn. It's the Boy Scouts, who have their students swear oaths to things orthogonal to primary goals of the group, that tend to have problems.

    159. Re:This is sick by aricusmaximus · · Score: 1

      Why is GoldSpider's post being moderated informative? I don't get it. Oh, wait, this is Slashdot.

      GoldSpider said:

      "With that off my chest, might I refer you to our Bill of Rights. Specifically: "...or the right of the people peaceably to assemble""

      Where did the parent post say that the Boy Scouts couldn't assemble? What the parent post said was: "They deserve neither our respect nor our money." The parent post said nothing about the second amendment or the Boy Scout's right to assemble.

      Yet GoldSpider wants to imply that the poster is against the 2nd amendment. That's pretty sleazy, Mr. Spider.

    160. Re:This is sick by aricusmaximus · · Score: 1

      GoldSpider said:

      "It is petty of you to deride an organization that first and foremost encourages community volunteerism and service. "

      It's hardly petty to condemn visible and respected group discriminates against a significant portion of our population. The Boy Scouts can encourage community, volunteerism and service AND include gay scouts. Treating gays as second-class citizens hardly seems vital to the Boy Scout's mission. In fact, IMHO, punishing a young gay man for his sexual identity seems rather mean and petty. Aren't young gay teenager part of the community that the Boy Scouts are supposed to serve?

      Regarding the right of assembly (which, need I remind people, the parent post *never* mentioned):

      You can certainly be a member of the Boy Scouts. You can also join the Klu Klux Clan. That's your right under the 2nd Amendment.

      The Boy Scouts are exercising their right to assemble and exclude gays. But doesn't mean that their actions are right. Should they be allowed to assemble? Absolutely. Should they recieve our support while discriminating against young gay teenagers who want to join? IMHO, absolutely not.

    161. Re:This is sick by Alsee · · Score: 1

      campaigning to give kids some perspective on copyright infringement

      Which this project MOST CERTAINLY IS NOT.

      I've looked at these sorts of "copyright educational materials" before. The most charitable charicterisation would be to call it "grossly oversimplified". A more accurat characterisation would be deliberate lies and propaganda promoting a legislative agenda to CHANGE copyright law.

      I, and many of the people complaining here today, would welcome legitimate education on copyright law. Something an industry sponsored merit badge is most certainly not going to be.

      >Should researchers face criminal prosecution merely for discussing the copyright protection measures of a new gadget?

      When the intent of the discussion is clearly to divulge a closely held trade secret, then the intentional damage does come across just like most other intentional damage, yes.


      Wrong.

      It would be a violation of trade secret for an obligated insider toexpose the information. However the prior poster said a RESEARCHER, which presumably indicates a researcher studying a system and reverse enginering it. That is most certainly not a violation of trade secret law.

      The issue here is the absurd DMCA. The DMCA which declars that INNOCENT NONINFRINGING PEOPLE can go to prison for up to a decade. The DMCA making it criminal to preform certain math calculations, the DMCA making it criminal to teach people certain math calculations. The DMCA attempting to do an end run around the constitution by indirectly denying constitutionally established Fair Use rights. The DMCA which was literally writen by lawyers employed by the publishing industry. The DMCA which is saddling us with deliberately crippled products because it prohibits any free market competition in such products and criminalizes any attempt to repair such products. The DMCA which institutionalizes and enforces a variety of otherwise illegal trade practices.

      Some people defend the DMCA at all costs as a means of dealing with copyright infringment. Well ok, that is a reasonable motivation.

      Other people attack the DMCA at all costs because they see it criminalizing innocent and noninfringing people. That is a reasonable motivation as well.

      The question is CAN YOU IMPRISON INNOCENT AND NONINFRINGING PEOPLE simply because that is easier than only going after people who actually infringe? Can you take a giant boot and just stomp on the innocent and guilty alike because it's the easiest way to stomp on the guilty?

      I dunno, I kinda thought one of the core American values was that the rights of the innocent come first. That you cannot stomp the innocent to get at the guilty. Even if that means you have to work harder to seperate the innocent from the guilty and only persue and prosecute the guilty.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    162. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That doesn't mean the rest of world has been bludgeoned into agreement by your country.

      Yeah, curse that silly Frenchman Victor Hugo and his Berne Convention.

      Oh, is that not the country you were thinking of? In that case, maybe you're just a moron.

    163. Re:This is sick by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Who are YOU to impose your beliefs upon them? Isn't that the very thing you people are fond of accusing 'conservative' groups of doing?

      The grandparent post said nothing about forcing beliefs on anyone. It just said we should not respect or approve of the Boy Scouts. And why the hell should we respect or approve of them?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    164. Re:This is sick by dangitman · · Score: 1
      is that by not making a stink about that rampant problem,

      How is copyright infringement a "rampant problem"? The copyright holders are still making millions, no-one is being directly hurt. Meanwhile, a significant portion of the world's population is starving. Pollution is everywhere, and we don't have a sustainable energy source. Violence and war is widespread.

      It's pretty fucked up if "piracy" is considered a real problem in the face of all this. Oh my god, how will Metallica afford that walk-in humidor now? Won't somebody think of the mega-stars?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    165. Re:This is sick by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Kindly tell me how the Boy Scouts actively suppress those who disagree with them. As far as I know, all the Boy Scouts say is you can't join our club.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    166. Re:This is sick by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      What is wrong with the requirements you typed in? Yes some of it seems old but they still apply today (prodigy, compuserve replaced with other isp's, AOL is still with us today. The point is you still need an ISP). We still have e-mail for example, programs are still programs today. Looks like a very good introduction to computers to me. We are not making them computer scientists any more than the astronomy merrit badge makes you an astronomer or the carpentry a carpenter. It is detailed without getting too detailed and yet generic, Microsoft not required. They even make them aware of copyright issues. How would you change it?

      The programs to get into are the learning for life in the Boy Scouts. They have entire states that want to use it in schools it is so good (they don't let them for obvious reasons). Ventures and Explorers are great. White Water rafting, skiing, sailing, shooting, whatever you want to do and it is legal with few exceptions. Exceptions like sky diving, paintball (can't have boys shooting other boys!). Things that are very dangerous.

      I have seen the Explorers, Ventures and even standard old Boy Scout's save the life of a number of boys. People that have gone on to very good lives and not necessarily just boys. Explorers and Venture crews allow girls. Some of the most determined women I know have turned out to be former Boy Scouts. We seem to be getting a lot more Girl Scouts as they have turned more politically correct. Recently they eliminated the rank of Cadette because they felt it sounded to military. They also don't do cool things.

      Sorry you didn't have a better experience. It is hard to get great results when the organization is almost entirely run by volunteers. I think they do a very good job considering.

    167. Re:This is sick by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Who are YOU to impose your beliefs upon them?"

      I'm not the original poster, but my opinion is that it's ultimately their problem to deal with (both as a loss of qualified peronnel and as a loss of face for the organization in the eyes of many). However, that still leaves us free to disapprove of BSA's actions.

      I've looked at the original post and all the parent called for was personal action on the part of the readers, not any real imposition on BSA beyond calling for people to stop financially supporting them. We're talking about individual action, not legal sanction. Where's the victim?

      "It is petty of you to deride an organization that first and foremost encourages community volunteerism and service."

      Service to whom, though? The personal interests of the leadership? It's hard for me as an outsider to not see BSA as a political organization, where the soup kitchens serve as PR as well as "community service."

      "your involvement would taint their good work."

      My inner anarchist questions the "good work" of any organization that requires oathes of obedience from its members. Not even the US military goes that far.

    168. Re:This is sick by brontus3927 · · Score: 1
      For my critique see my above post #12424863

      My troop had paintball outings semi-routinely.

      The reason Boy Scouts have saved lives, is because they learn more than just a basic "introduction." That's what I'm asking for, is more than just a survey course that can be gone over in 30 minutes.

    169. Re:This is sick by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "i would be sickened if the FSF tried indoctrinating children too. not as sick, since it is not for financial gain, "

      I guess you did not see the many posts on slashdot for a GPL meritbadge?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    170. Re:This is sick by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?

      Yes.

    171. Re:This is sick by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The copyright holders are still making millions

      Plenty of musicians, for example, only make a modest living. Killing off their sales actually does impact their standard of living.

      Meanwhile, a significant portion of the world's population is starving

      Which is certainly alleviated by being able to use their broadband internet connections to avoid paying artists for their entertainment.

      Pollution is everywhere, and we don't have a sustainable energy source

      I know, and you're suggesting that by using p2p and skipping the whole pay-the-artist part, we'll reduce trips to the retail store in giant SUVs to buy plastic disks that were pumped out of the ground. Oh, wait! We can avoid those things and not rip off the artists, by actually paying for the entertainment we want!

      Violence and war is wide spread

      Certainly what we need, then, is an entire generation of people growing up thinking that the things people produce have no value, and that everyone is entitled to the fruits of everyone else's work for free. We should all just work for the state, pay big taxes, and get everything for free! Then there'd be no war. Certainly that would eliminate the types of people that slaughter whole villages in Darfur. Or the ones that think women should be trapped at home in their Burkhas on pain of death, and be willing to blow up people in line for a job in order to show how right they are. And definately, making sure that Peter Jackson, even as people rave about his craftsmanship, doesn't get a dime out of the cool people who know better than to pay for such things... that will foster a better sense in the world of why it's not helpful for North Korea to have a big fat nuclear tantrum as they starve their people to death in work camps.

      You propose a false dichotomy, and imply that dealing with such things are mutually exclusive. Well hell, while there are hungry people in the world, I don't know how you can consider it appropriate to enjoy any music at all! How can you live with yourself? Or maybe there's no joy in it when it's ripped off, thus making it OK.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    172. Re:This is sick by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1
      "No one is going to suggest that every facet of copyright law is a perfect fit with our evolving economy and society."
      Especially not me. In fact, the whole of copyright law is so embarassingly out of step that it would be downright amusing if the implications weren't so profoundly bad for our society.

      You seem to be under the misguided impression that the only "real issue" here is rampant piracy, and artists being ripped off thereby, and that all these other issues are of merely academic interest. First, I would like you to read Lawrence Lessig's account of Alex Alben's creation of a retrospective on Clint Eastwood's career. One thing Lessig never explicitly points out was that the project started out intending to be the first in a series. But after taking a year to clear rights for using Eastwood's movies, the legal barriers were just too high to scale again.

      Despite your unsubstantiated rejection, archivists are indeed having difficulties due to draconian copyright law. There are literally thousands of films from the 1930's and 1940's which aren't commercially available. Back then, in order to get a copyright, you had to leave a copy with the Library of Congress. But then there was a loophole that said the owners could borrow back the copy for as long as they wanted and at no cost. Over 5000 of those movies were borrowed, and often they were the only known copy. Maybe the owners are taking good care of them. Maybe they're molding away in a leaky basement somewhere. But we have the technology to preserve them forever, for historians, for fans, for filmmakers looking for inspiration from the past. It's the law that keeps this from happening.

      Then there are projects like Project Gutenberg, which goes about digitizing and archiving public domain works. If they don't clear the rights to a work beforehand, they can't even begin. You can't digitize a book without copying it, and copyright law expressly forbids unauthorized copying. Sometimes clearing them is impossible, because the proper records are gone, or because it's impossible to find the person you need to talk to. 95% of the works they are interested in archiving have zero commercial value, but should still be preserved for the future.

      I'm talking about real barriers to real creativity and real preservation of culture here. In fact, I would argue that the protection of what you call "a few cases of academic interest" vastly outweigh the dangers of unlicenced copying. The arguments that "I wouldn't have bought it anyways," or "I'm helping make the band more popular" don't justify piracy ethically, but they should still be given consideration when it comes to evaluating actual financial harm. There is a very real possibility that the overall harm to the bottom line is marginal. Again, that doesn't justify the practice, but it certainly would mean that we shouldn't be taking all these extraordinary measures and upsetting necessary balances in copyright law in order to quash the practice.

      If every P2P app in the world suddenly shut down, and everyone was obtaining all their content from authorized sources, do you think for one minute that the litigation-happy nitwits that brought us the DMCA would suddenly think, "You know, maybe 28 years is plenty of time to recoup our investment in this film?" Or, "Maybe we should weaken the DRM in this application so that people can pull samples from it and exercise their fair use rights." It's not about money, it's about control, and always has been.
      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    173. Re:This is sick by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      My troop had paintball outings semi-routinely.

      Not saying it doesn't happen, just as some troops do laser tag as well. If they applied for a tour permit they would have been denied. If they asked the BSA if they could do it they would have been told no. Whoever was responsible for that activity did it on his own and wouldn't have been elgible for insurance coverage if something went wrong. At least that is what they tell me whenever I ask and I have asked all the way up to the national level.

      I'm surprised you think that you could fulfill the requirements in 30 minutes looking at the list. You think for example that in 30 minutes that you can do #4? What I see there in the requirements are at least a few days worth of work and similiar to the other merrit badge requirements. I have a bunch of MB books at home. Some from the 1930's.

      Looking at your referenced critique I have to wonder if you think they are ... well dumb or imbiciles. #6 covers this concern for the most part I think. If they can discuss the terms in those categories then they should be aware of the components and relative prices to the point they can make an informed decision. In practice my experience shows it isn't a problem. They are very aware of the differences. Sometimes I run into the usual preferences - like GM and Ford (or foreign) for example with cars. They seem to know exactly what they want and how much it would cost to deliver it to their door. Maybe the Boy Scouts I work with are smarter than normal Boy Scouts? Somehow I doubt it. For those that wouldn't know, I sincerely doubt they would be able to get Eagle. They will drop out long before that.

      With the requirement to put one together, that was considered. It was dropped due to practical concerns. It may be revisited in the future.

      Thanks for taking the time to say something about it.

    174. Re:This is sick by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If this is really that lucrative of a business model, why aren't more people doing it? The reason is that it's not as profitable as traditional, intellectual property-backed models.

      Just how profitable are these "traditional ip-backed models" when everyone is copying the "ip" on the net for nothing, despite it being illegal with draconian punishments to do so?

      Maybe the reason more people aren't doing it yet is inertia. Intellectually, most people are still stuck in the payment via distribution system and haven't seriously considered any other option. Technologicly, the internet is still a baby. File copying has been easy to implement because there is no government involvement - money transfers is much more complicated due in part to all of the regulation, just ask paypal.

      Arguing that any other approach is invalid because it is not already in use is just circular reasoning.

      With this model, a creator only makes a fixed amount of money, whereas a creator can sell their work for the duration of their copyright

      You are arguing that it is better to gamble on the popularity of a product after having invested in the effort to create it than it is to take a known return on an essentially risk free production? I know A LOT of investors that would love to be able to earn a guaranteed return of even just 10% a quarter.

      all the proposed alternative business models have one thing in common: less profit for the creator.

      I believe this to be false. The current approach encourages superstars and abject failures - for every michael jackson, there are 100,000 nobodies who gambled and lost.

      I don't care about the creator, and neither does society.

      I believe this to be false. Society cares about the creator immensely, the creator is effectively a brand name. If the creator has a good reputation for producing desirable work, then consumers are willing to trust that the creator's next work will be similarly desirable. To argue otherwise is to deny the obvious - Tom Cruise, Stephen King, Led Zeppelin, Quentin Tarantino - creators in all genres are just as important, if not more so, to the buying public than the most heavily promoted coroprate brands like Nike and Coke.

      A work-for-hire mechanism can be at least as lucrative as the current system. Today, anyone starting out pretty much works for free - musicians either give it away on the net or give it away to the RIAA. Indie film producers are lucky to even be selected for a film festival, much less get distribution. So given that baseline, a work-for-hire model requires that initial creations be sold for little or no money in order to build a reputation for the creator. If the creator is good, he will be able to command increasingly higher fees for each new creation - not because people are necessarily willing to pay more, but because the better his stuff, the larger the pool of people who have experienced it and liked it enough to pay for the next work will be. For example, with roughly a billion people on the net, if only 0.1% think that Joe Cool's next album is worth $1 to them, that's $1,000,000 direct to Joe Cool. That's the kind of money only the super of the super-stars see on any regular basis.

    175. Re:This is sick by natrius · · Score: 1

      I like how I got the moderator smackdown from 5 to 1. If you disagree with what I said, reply to it like others did. Downward moderation is for posts that you don't think are worth people's time. If that was the case, people wouldn't have replied to me.

    176. Re:This is sick by natrius · · Score: 1

      Just how profitable are these "traditional ip-backed models" when everyone is copying the "ip" on the net for nothing, despite it being illegal with draconian punishments to do so?

      People take infringe on copyright precisely because they don't see any repercussions for their actions. Furthermore, if people disregard intellectual property laws, of course those business models won't be profitable. My whole point was that society benefits from IP laws existing and people following them, although the laws aren't perfect and need to be changed.

      Society cares about the creator immensely, the creator is effectively a brand name.

      I think you misunderstand what I was saying here. We made intellectual property laws to ensure that more works would be created, not to ensure the livelihood of creators. That's just a side effect.

      A work-for-hire mechanism can be at least as lucrative as the current system.

      If that was true, then more people would use that system. Intellectual property law doesn't prevent people from using that model. The reason artists don't use that model is because traditional models are more lucrative.

      If the creator is good, he will be able to command increasingly higher fees for each new creation - not because people are necessarily willing to pay more, but because the better his stuff, the larger the pool of people who have experienced it and liked it enough to pay for the next work will be.

      Works take an initial investment to put out. This initial investment allows for the artist to focus on their work instead of working on the side, resulting in better work. Also, the work itself costs money to put together. Record labels act as venture capitalists in the music industry by funding artists.

      Moreover, the model you suggest takes the focus off of the work and onto the creator. This is backwards. Like I said before, I don't care about the creator and neither does society. I want to pay for a creative work, not pay someone to create something. By paying for the work itself after it's created, I can make sure the work is good before I buy it by listening to it in a store, or listening to a preview on iTunes. In the model you suggest, I would have to function as a venture capitalist. I don't want to do that, and neither do most people. We don't get a return on investment other than the work itself, so there is very little incentive for consumers to take that risk.

      Work-for-hire models are less profitable than traditional models in most cases. They will not replace traditional models unless we force them to by taking away intellectual property rights. If we do that, we'll be forcing the industry to use a less profitable model, therefore less creative works will be produced. That's the whole reason IP law exists.

      For example, with roughly a billion people on the net, if only 0.1% think that Joe Cool's next album is worth $1 to them, that's $1,000,000 direct to Joe Cool. That's the kind of money only the super of the super-stars see on any regular basis.

      This occurs very infrequently, if at all. If this model was as profitable as you say, they would choose this model instead. Essentially, this is the model that artists use before they get record deals. They get money for concerts and merchandise they sell to people who want to see them put out another work. However, once they get a record deal, they usually take it. Why? It's more profitable.

      Creative works would still be produced without intellectual property rights, but there would be less of them. Instead, let artists choose to reliquish their intellectual property rights, and support the ones who do with your money. That doesn't mean it's okay to ignore the intellectual property rights we've given creators as a society. The "get a new business model" argument is crap unless you want to see less creative works produced. The typical response to this is "Well, most of the stuff out there is crap!" So... don't download it?

    177. Re:This is sick by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      Check out your FY2004. When the BS of A kicked out two gay members, the federal money thing came up again. Funny thing was, the BSA was using federal funds to pay lawyers fees for their case. This was a big no-no. So DC put an end to that (in FY 2004 District of Columbia Appropriations) In H.R. 2765, you will find the following under restrictions..

      BOY SCOUTS: Prohibits Federal or D.C. Funds from being used to issue, administer, or enforce the D.C. Commission on Human Rights ruling that the Boy Scouts of America must reinstate two homosexual scout leaders and pay them $50,000 each plus legal fees.

      Pretty vauge, I know.
      A new bill was also introduced that would also cut fereral funding for public (read federal) schools that didn't let the BSA do assemblies and recruitment drives.

      Google may turn up more
      BBH

    178. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of musicians, for example, only make a modest living. Killing off their sales actually does impact their standard of living.

      No. It actually INCREASES it, the only "mucisians" that copyrights help financially are the ones who already have a strong monopoly on distribution, (eg madonna who owns a stake in virgin records). Everyone else is far better giving as much of their stuff away as humanly possible to make a name for themselves and get money thru other means like private performance.

      Which is certainly alleviated by being able to use their broadband internet connections to avoid paying artists for their entertainment.

      Yes it is, because there are plenty of real scarcities in the world, we don't need to add additional bullshit ones that artificially make informaion more scarce than it is for the sake of a few cusshies that wanna sit on their ass and collect royalities. And yes it is even moreso because this HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TAKING PAY FROM ARTISTS it has to do with controlling information in the information age, and the poor and oppressed need freedom from that more than anyone else!

      I know, and you're suggesting that by using p2p and skipping the whole pay-the-artist part, we'll reduce trips to the retail store in giant SUVs to buy plastic disks that were pumped out of the ground. Oh, wait! We can avoid those things and not rip off the artists, by actually paying for the entertainment we want!

      What a CROCK! Nobody has a problem here if someone wants to pay $500 to go to a concert. Nobody has a problem here if someone wants to pay $10000 for a private performance, or a portrait. The problem is controll freaks who think that their entitled to controll what people copy even when the cats out of the bag, and the songs, and the movies, and whatever is already dissipated all over the planet. 25 years ago, we could put up with their crap when it was just limited to xerox machines and cassets, but now we just need to tell them to get with the information age or go to hell.

      Certainly what we need, then, is an entire generation of people growing up thinking that the things people produce have no value ... ... ...

      What we need is people who understand that rights arent centered arround feelings, or "what's in it for me" attitude - they are centered arround facts. For example, property is a just way of dealing with the truth that not everybody can use something at the same time, the same is true paying and charging for services is also a just way to negotiate a value for peoples limited resources, but now greedy people try to fangle this into an excuse to controll how people use information at their disposal. Well information itself doesn't have natural limits, so they just need give up being controll freaks or just put up with being the loosers they deserve to be.

    179. Re:This is sick by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      What we need is people who understand that rights arent centered arround feelings, or "what's in it for me" attitude - they are centered arround facts.

      So, if I take something from you (say, an hour of your time, the manuscript for the novel you're working on, or the money from your checking account), the fact is that I now have it. So, presto, despite anyone's "feelings," as you put it, I've just re-defined your rights? That's BS, and you're missing the entire point. If you can talk someone who creates things for a living into not caring whether, or in what way, her work is or is not paid for, then great! You've got a convert. Obviously you have no respect for (in fact, you obviously hate) people who prefer to have some influence over whether or not they've worked for free. Since you're so annoyed by those people, you surely wouldn't want to be entertained by anything they've created, since that would be intellectually dishonest. So, obviously, you choose not see any commercial films, or listen to the radio, or do anything else that would get those people paid for what they invested time and money to produce. So, since you don't care about those artists, why do care what their business arrangements are? You've obviously found a lot of people who are willing to entertain you for free, and you're obviously satisfied with the films, books, and recordings that they produce. Why worry about the "control freaks" you hate so much when you wouldn't want anything they produce anyway? And no one else you care about would want it either, so just leave those dinosaurs to die off, and focus instead on your idyllic alternate universe, where being able to take something makes it right to do so.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    180. Re:This is sick by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2

      People infringe on copyright precisely because they don't see any repercussions for their actions. Furthermore, if people disregard intellectual property laws, of course those business models won't be profitable. My whole point was that society benefits from IP laws existing and people following them, although the laws aren't perfect and need to be changed.

      The laws are both draconian and unenforceable. No matter how you change the laws, the unenforceable part will never change. Relying on unenforceable laws to support an arbitrary business model is pure folly. You can not fight human nature and win. You can try, you can make it a long, bloody battle, but in the end you will lose. You can not cite a single example in all of mankind's history that shows otherwise.

      If that was true, then more people would use that system.

      Again, circular reasoning proves nothing.

      The reason artists don't use that model is because traditional models are more lucrative.

      The reason artists don't use that model is because traditional models HAVE BEEN more lurcrative than traditional options. Times are changing. If they weren't changing, we would not be having this discussion because payment-pooling is a NEW option.

      I can make sure the work is good before I buy it by listening to it in a store, or listening to a preview on iTunes. In the model you suggest

      You can, most people don't. Even the people that do, do not "preview" the ENTIRE product before hand. Many people pre-order books, CDs and DVDs, buy movie tickets on opening night, go to concerts, susbcribe to magazines and premium cable channels. I subscribe to the Economist based on their editorial reputation. Heck, I even subscribe to Film Movement's DVD-of-the-month service based soley on their past ability to select good movies. A large amount, probably a large MAJORITY of entertainment purchasing decisions are based on the REPUTATION of the creators or service providers. Sure, some people read reviews, hear things through word of mouth, etc. But there is no better advertisement than free access to all of an artist's prior creations.

      I would have to function as a venture capitalist. I don't want to do that, and neither do most people. We don't get a return on investment other than the work itself, so there is very little incentive for consumers to take that risk.

      As I just demonstrated, people take equivalent risks all the time. The upside under either the current system or a work-for-hire system is that you get a good product, the downside is that you get a sucky product. That's the entire risk. If you went to the theater during open weekend for Gigli, you didn't get your money back, but you probably are going to think twice about shelling out for the next Ben Affleck movie. Under a work-for-hire system, you would have had EXACTLY the same experience.

      This occurs very infrequently, if at all. If this model was as profitable as you say, they would choose this model instead.

      Around and around you go with the circular reasoning - don't look at anything new because its not already old and well-understood... Mass payment pooling systems are JUST NOW on the verge of becoming possible - therefore few people have even had the chance to experiment with them. Even so, one musician has already won a grammy for an album funded in a somewhat similar fashion - jazz vocalist Maria Schneider.

      The "get a new business model" argument is crap unless you want to see less creative works produced.

      Have you considered that maybe we would see MORE works and MORE creativity if the current system was junked? ALL of your arguments are based on the UNPROVABLE contention that since what we have today has, to some extent, worked in the past, there can be no better way to do things in the future. The converse is also true, I can't prove that any new way would be better. But at least my proposal addresses the FUNDAMENTAL failing of the current system - that information wants to be free because it is human nature to make it so, and digital networks are the enabler for that. Your way tries to fight human nature, my way co-opts it and uses it to promote further creativity.

    181. Re:This is sick by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      You can't just ignore what goes on somewhere and always look the other way. At the very least you can speak up for it, and bear the consequences. If the nazi's are building up their power right next to you, are you just gonna look the other way and donate your money to someone else? That aint gonna do diddly squat. Or, if there is genocide in Africa, where kids are killed just because someone's moral views doesn't include your own moral views, is that fine? They beat up a guy next to you in the street, close to killing him, are you gonna just say hey, it's not my problem, it's their morality, I don't agree with it, so I'm just ignoring it? When God asked Kain about where is your brother Abel, Kain shrugged it off, and said: Am I my brother's keeper? Well, what do YOU think, as a moral relativist, ARE YOU? I think you have a say in what humanity is like, you have a one person vote in it, to shape it and mold "the law of the land", "the rules we live by", and you excersize it by bitching and caring about issues. Sure, the majority may overpower you with their wish, with their view on how humanity should be, but that doesn't mean you don't have the right to at least try to exert an effort to change things, to how you think things should be. At the very least if you and someone who disagrees with you on an issue, yet you share a common ground on something more basic, more axiomatic values, then there is room for constructive discussion. For example, you both want to live happily, you just think there are different ways to go about it, that oppose each other, thinking the opponent's view yields less happiness, then at least there is room for discussion over how one moral rule and it's outcomes affect other values, and then you can do statistics, surveys, experiments, and come to some commong ground by evaluating the measurement results. Not everything has an answer, but there is room for debate if you happen to share some common moral values, even if those values were chosen by moral relativists.

    182. Re:This is sick by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Of course there is the other side of ths story too, in how much tolerance and divergence from your own morality is acceptable, before you start bitching, or even leap into action. In fact, a very nice moral rule is to be as tolerant as possible. So tolerating the existance of a group excluding gays is not quite the same as tolerating someone getting killed right next to you in the street, or tolerating genocide in Africa. As far as bitching goes, the threshhold could be quite low, you could start bitching at the slightest nuance of things out of whack, but leaping into action is quite another thing, because that has a lot more consequences, you better evaluate what you do carefully, but you can run your mouth all over the place a lot easier.

    183. Re:This is sick by garote · · Score: 1
      Sorry, was using the definition that Aethiesm wasn't a religion. But since you say it is, maybe we should start applying seperation of church and state to it as well?

      This statement doesn't make any sense. Church and state? Atheists vs. a private organization? What kind of point are you trying to make?

  6. The Badge by Artax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really at the end of the day its just a badge. Sure it brainwashes kids to keep their intellectual property safe. Maybe if they keep the property then they will begin to think that the government can't interfere with their own intellectual property. This would be a huge step forward in China.

    --
    Don't mod me up.
    1. Re:The Badge by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > > Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."
      >
      >Maybe if they keep the property then they will begin to think that the government can't interfere with their own intellectual property. This would be a huge step forward in China.

      slashdot 54550 reporting: lastpost 877602 doubleplusungood refs unevent "great leap forward". Rewrite fullwise upmod anteposting.

      If shinyvictoryhelmet wearing, plusoldposter unknow crimethink! PWN3D :)

      --
      Long live the Greater Eastasian Co-Prosperity Sphere Junior Anti-Piracy League!

    2. Re:The Badge by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Really at the end of the day its just a badge.

      When I was a scout, the badges focused on practical living and outdoor skills and community-oriented service work. I don't recall "The Free Market" or "Anti Communism" or even "Property Rights". This is a bit overboard, IMO.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:The Badge by jshine · · Score: 1

      brilliant

    4. Re:The Badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great thanks for posting

    5. Re:The Badge by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

      What's really awful is that I'm currently in a stage production of 1984, and can translate that to Old English without a problem:

      "slashdot 54550 reporting: lastpost 877602 doubleplusungood refs unevent "great leap forward". Rewrite fullwise upmod anteposting."

      Slashdot user Tackhead, with ID 54550, repots that a previous post 877602 is extremely unsatesfactory as it references an event which didn't happen, the "great leap forward." Please rewrite the post in full, confirming your changes with a moderator prior to posting.

      -Trillian

  7. This has to be a joke by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because, if you think piracy is bad here in the US...

    In Asia it's all but legal. The problem is so big that mitigating it will take a lot more than a few boyscouts earning merit badges in Intellectual Property.

    That is the most absurd think i've ever heard!!! Where is the world coming to?

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:This has to be a joke by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      Where is the world coming to?

      Seems that you're already there! Not to be a grammar Nazi but.. Perhaps you meant "where is this world GOING to?" Or even "WHAT is this world coming to?"

    2. Re:This has to be a joke by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      It's like kids graduating from the DARE program in the US...

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    3. Re:This has to be a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seems that you're already there! Not to be a grammar Nazi but.. Perhaps you meant "where is this world GOING to?" Or even "WHAT is this world coming to?"

      Not to be a grammar Nazi but... Perhaps you meant "Where is this world going?" The word "to" is unnecessary. :)

    4. Re:This has to be a joke by NixLuver · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight. You think there is a common legal stratum across "Asia", and that it's a "big" problem that the 'Asian' laws are significantly different from ours in regards to "Intellectual Property" (which would, of course, not be so if the laws in question do not support the concept). Even though, if the laws in question do not define it so, it cannot be 'piracy'?

      Would it surprise you to discover that Asia encompasses many different countries, all with discrete legal structures and copyright? Would it surprise you to discover that those laws sometimes differ significantly from American laws?

  8. What? by Omega1045 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny, my calendar shows May 3rd, not April 1st... this is just weird and scary.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're A BIG BALL OF POO!

  9. BSA by ReverendLoki · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, it used to annoy me that these two shared the same initials. Turns out it was just being a bit prophetic...

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  10. l33t skillz merit badge by MooseByte · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hong Kong Boy Scouts Association has teamed up with the MPA to create an intellectual property merit badge."

    I think the "l33t skillz" merit badge is going to trump that one any day of the week...

    1. Re:l33t skillz merit badge by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

      To earn the l33t skilz merit badge one must obtain the IP merit badge off another Socut's uniform without the other Scout's knowledge.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:l33t skillz merit badge by phoenix42 · · Score: 1

      only if you can also get a WTFpwning merit badge.

      --
      forty-two
    3. Re:l33t skillz merit badge by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1

      Why can't the other Scout know? Doesn't social engineering count toward l33tness these days?

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
    4. Re:l33t skillz merit badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " To earn the l33t skilz merit badge one must obtain the IP merit badge off another Socut's uniform without the other Scout's knowledge"

      Yeah, and replace their victim's badge with one that says "PWN3D!!oneoneone!!!11"

  11. sounds a bit ominous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely a better way would be to drop such orwellian idea's and concentrate on providing a lasting business model which renders piracy pointless, like dirt cheap music from fast servers

  12. Yeah, I didn't RTFA.... by fallen1 · · Score: 0

    but even if I did I'm pretty sure this is complete and utter HORSEHIT.

    The BOY SCOUTS are going to do the job that a mega-corp watchdog group is supposed to do itself? WTF is up with that?

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  13. fucking disgusting by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When a large industry has trouble enforcing rules it effectively set (speficially copyright terms and reductions on what constitutes fair use,) and begins to use Boy Scouts to 'spread the gospel'/'indoctrinate', you have to wonder if the law really is in the interest of the people.

    Yet another case of people serving the economy, as opposed to vice versa.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  14. ROFL! by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
    "Intellectual property merit badge." The Hong Kong Boy Scouts Association owes me a new LCD monitor, since my old one has just been sprayed with Pepsi.

    Jokes aside, "protecting" intellectual property isn't just something you can do once, but something that will occur over your entire life. When do they get it? How do leaders know that, once they've got this badge, they won't just go back to torrenting stuff? Honestly, this is the most ridiculous idea I've ever heard. What's next, a Coke merit badge (which you get by promising never to drink any other cola)?

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:ROFL! by PainBot · · Score: 1

      I don't think the details on how they're gonna get the badge are what's the most disgusting here.

    2. Re:ROFL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Jokes aside

      I can't find anything funny in your post to put aside.


  15. Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by lake2112 · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what the Hong Kong boy scouts are like, but here in the US you will not find a strong criminal element (ignoring little boy pictures) that emanates from the Boy Scouts. You don't preach to college students the benefits of higher education.

    1. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You don't preach to college students the benefits of higher education.
      Maybe we should. Most college students I know would rather go out and drink beer than sit in class learning.
    2. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That depends on what you mean by "criminal element". Not that long ago when I was a boyscout we copied songs and movies to tapes and shared them.(sure the MPAA would have loved to curb that) We also shared them electronically via ftp using our 9600 baud modems.(and we liked it, up hill both ways and whatnot) Plus there was the usual 12-16 year old stuff beer, pot smoking and ciggarette smoking. Since not much has probably changed in 10 years I would imagine these are the kids sharing movies and soon to be kids sharing movies that the MPAA would love to indoctrina^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H influence.

    3. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The real problem with P2P filesharing is that many people don't actually realize that it is illegal. I fix a lot of computers and I have lost track of the amount of times that I have mentioned to someone that they were guilty of distributing copyrighted material illegally only to have them look at me like a deer caught in someone's headlights. Some people understand that what they are doing is illegal, but lots of folks have no idea. These people thought that free music was one of the perks of having an Internet connection and were generally horrified once they learned that what they were doing was illegal.

      If it becomes second nature for even honest people to download bootleg music off the Internet then no amount of legislation or litigation is going to help the music industry (and later the television, movie, and publishing industries as well). So someone in the scouting organization is simply pointing out to these kids that disregarding copyrights is illegal and unethical. Personally I am hoping that this sort of thinking becomes more widespread. There is no question that the music industry is evil, but I don't think that throwing out copyrights is the answer.

    4. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If it becomes second nature for even honest people to download bootleg music off the Internet then no amount of legislation or litigation is going to help the music industry (and later the television, movie, and publishing industries as well).

      You say that as if it's a bad thing.

      We already have way too much content, and almost all of it is crap. These industries could use some extensive thinning out. Eliminating windfall financial incentives would be a good start.

      The subpar products made by most of these producers are nowhere near worth the impacts on personal freedoms required to prop them up.

    5. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      So someone in the scouting organization is simply pointing out to these kids that disregarding copyrights is illegal and unethical.

      Illegal, yes. Unethical? Disregarding copyright is not fundamental unethical. Murder is. Theft is. The only way I can see it at all unethical is if one were to pretend that which they pirated was legal bought, which is something like socially cheating. I doubt many people would begin to claim they spent tons of money on all their pirated songs, movies, and games.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    6. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We already have way too much content, and almost all of it is crap.

      I tend to agree that popular music is crap. However, millions of people disagree (which is why the music is "popular"). Either way, disregarding someone else's copyrights is hardly ethical.

      These industries could use some extensive thinning out.

      Which is why I support artists that are outside of the mainstream. There is plenty of quality music where the artists are happy to let you download their work. I support these artists financially because that is the ethical way to change the music industry. Disregarding copyrights doesn't help anyone. It simply makes it more likely that laws will be passed that force DRM down all of our throats. I may disagree with the musicians that turn their copyrighted material over to the music industry, but it's a choice they made of their own free will. I know that I would be upset if someone used my copyrighted material contrary to my wishes. You simply can't claim the moral high ground while going against the wishes of the folks that created the music in the first case.

      Basically, just because I don't like the music industry doesn't give me the right to violate their copyrights.

    7. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Unless you are one of the people that believes that copyright should be abolished entirely, then disregarding someone else's copyright is clearly unethical.

      Personally, I think that copyright works pretty well. I believe that artists, authors, and computer programmers should be able to decide how their creations are used. Copyright might keep someone from being able to freely make a copy of Windows XP, but it also guarantees that [insert evil corporation here] can't create a modified version of a GPLed program without releasing source code. Copyright also keeps big publishers from simply printing and selling their own versions of popular books without paying the original author.

      When you distribute someone else's copyrighted material you are taking their creation and using it contrary to their specific request. As someone who has created some stuff myself, I have a problem with that. In a lot of cases its not about money changing hands, but rather about following the wishes of the copyrighted work's creator.

    8. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1
      it also guarantees that [insert evil corporation here] can't create a modified version of a GPLed program without releasing source code.

      If we had a market in which access to source was an expected, baseline feature, then we would not need to enforce the GPL because the market would do so all on its own. Just like it is an expected baseline feature that you can open the hood on your own car and futz with the mechanicals if you so desire.

      Copyright also keeps big publishers from simply printing and selling their own versions of popular books without paying the original author.

      Your statement assumes that associating compensation with distribution is valid. Because the net makes distribution effectively a zero-cost operation, does it really make sense to add a fee to what is now baseline free? Perhaps the authors, and other creators, would be better off getting paid up front for the work they do in the process of creation - just like 99% of the rest of the working world.

      I believe that artists, authors, and computer programmers should be able to decide how their creations are used.

      Then your belief is in direct contradiction with the basis for American copyright law, the line goes thus,
      "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;"
      Your right to decide how your ideas are used is suppossed to end once it no longer promotes the progress of science and the useful arts. There is nothing in there about a moral right to determine the use. FWIW, moral right is a term of the art here, primarily rooted in european (as not English common-law based) copyright. If you are continental, then obviously the US constitution does not apply.
    9. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the authors, and other creators, would be better off getting paid up front for the work they do in the process of creation - just like 99% of the rest of the working world.

      If you can come up with a good viable way of doing this, 99% of the authors, artists, and musicians will jump on it. The pay-for-publication scheme mostly benefits the publishers (which is not entirely unreasonable, since they do a lot of work to get your ideas on store shelves).

    10. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Either way, disregarding someone else's copyrights is hardly ethical.

      Copyright was introduced as an economic incentive. This is clearly spelled out in the US Constitution. My argument was that the content industries are already overstiumlated. Therefore, right now we need less copyright protection, not more.

      The only unethical thing going on today is passing increasingly repressive, intrusive and draconian laws regarding copyright infringement when the breadth, duration, and enforcement of copyrights are already excessive.

    11. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Musicians have concerts. Artists have art exhibits and the ability to sell original works of art for money; they can also do comics, be funded by the rich (that was an old favorite), or simply do art as a hobby. Authors can write serials in the newspaper or other publications of the sort. They can also be paid to publicize their work by going to book-signing conventions. Maybe they can sell their ideas as movie scripts or the like. Programmers can work in companies doing IT or IS or whatever.

      The fact is, rockstars are a relatively recent aberration (basically since the start of movies). I can't off the top of my head think of a general copyrighted category that there isn't a field available now that relies very little on actual copyright. Most of it is daily works where piracy wouldn't get you very much (since actually pirating whole newspapers, manga, etc is rather klunky at best). Yes, I don't doubt that a lack of copyright would mean less artists; some artist do it purely for the money while others are only able to because of the money.

      So, the truth is 90%+ of creators could right now get a for-hire job (if they don't have one already to pay the bills). I wouldn't venture to guess what the exact percentage is. But clearly it's not nearly remotely a travesty if creators no longer had copyright to rely on. The only ones who have to really fear are all the managers and book publishers and whatever who may be made obsolete. The internet might make that happen anyways.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    12. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1
      We may end up seeing a return to the time when there are two kinds of (non-hobbyist) art: live performance and for-hire business-oriented work. Writers can write technical manuals and ad copy, and artists can design layout and provide illustrations for the manuals. The rest will be live poetry readings and music. It could be like ancient Greece, complete with itinerant (read: homeless) poets, actors, and musicians. At least Britney Spears would be gone.

      I think, though, that the entrepreneurial spirit will take over and somebody will find ways to make money from the arts. Actually, I was kind of hoping that you had some insights I could pirat^H^H^H^H^Hcopy and become the next evil content mogul. :-)

    13. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Yes, and lots of other folks would disagree with your assessment that less copyright protection is needed. Yet somehow you feel it is "ethical" to force your will upon the creators of the copyrighted material despite the fact that the agreed upon laws are clearly against you. If you don't like the current laws you are free to try and change them. Good luck though, as most people are fairly happy with the current system. Heck, I happen to agree with you that copyright has gone to far (especially when it comes to the duration that copyrights last), however, I understand that I am not supreme ruler of the entire universe and that sometimes the rule of law requires me to accept laws that I believe are imperfect. If copying the RIAA's works were somehow intrinsic to my survival then perhaps I could see how pushing my will above the will of the music's creators was ethical. Lacking that necessity, and in the face of the dictates of society, I just don't see how any sane person could make a case that distributing the latest Brittney Spears album illegally is ethical. I could maybe cede you the point that Elvis' work (or other early works) should be public domain by now, but by in large these are not the files that are getting traded.

      U.S. copyright law is only intrusive and draconian if you disregard it, which no one is forcing you to do. You've clearly got a problem with the RIAA, and you feel that their bad actions justify your own anti-social behavior. Well, that's one heck of a slippery slope.

    14. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      U.S. copyright law is only intrusive and draconian if you disregard it, which no one is forcing you to do.

      In the near future, much of the hardware I buy is most likely going to be crippled by government-mandated DRM schemes to appease the content industries. That is going to affect everyone whether they infringe on copyrights or not, and the indiscriminate nature of those schemes is going to prevent me from doing things that I'm legally entitled to do.

      Already, non-mandated DRM schemes are starting to get annoying. My new TV uses HDMI inputs rather than DVI so that they can encrypt it. This has been making it tougher for me interface it to my computer; it's a waste of my time to sort this out and I have to buy more obscure cables. But that's just a drop in the bucket compared to what's probably in store.

      Moreover, using government resources to enforce the ever-expanding copyright regimes for the benefit of a few parties who already get too much out of the current system is a waste of my tax money. Throwing even more of our population into prisons over this artificially manufactured "moral" issue when we already have the highest incarceration rate in the world is simply absurd.

      You've clearly got a problem with the RIAA, and you feel that their bad actions justify your own anti-social behavior. Well, that's one heck of a slippery slope.

      Where did I say that I illegally copy the RIAA's music? Hint: I didn't.

      At any rate, the slippery slope you should be concerned about isn't the risk of a bunch of 8th-graders falling into moral decay by trading a bunch of bubble-gum pop. The important slippery slope involves things like when the government starts delegating its authority to issue search warrants to private IP vigilantes. That's where we're headed because of this completely out-of-whack expansion of copyright.

  16. The Hong Kong Boy Scouts? by nekoniku · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that the name of Buckaroo Banzai's band?

    --
    "It's a wonderful idea. But it doesn't work." -- Tad Danielewski
    1. Re:The Hong Kong Boy Scouts? by MrAsstastic · · Score: 0

      Nah, it was the Hong Kong Cavaliers.

    2. Re:The Hong Kong Boy Scouts? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Actually, that was The Hong Kong Cavaliers.

      I am a veritable storehouse of useless information.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    3. Re:The Hong Kong Boy Scouts? by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      Hong Kong Cavaliers. Their scout-ish auxillary were Blue Blaze Irregulars.

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    4. Re:The Hong Kong Boy Scouts? by MrAsstastic · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, you are incorrect. The complete name was Buckaroo Banzai and the Hong Kong Cavaliers. Thanks for playing though.

    5. Re:The Hong Kong Boy Scouts? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait



      You can't seriously be this stupid.

      Even if your infinitesimal 'correction' had any merit whatsoever, that would mean you're contradicting yourself.

      Log off before you hurt yourself.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    6. Re:The Hong Kong Boy Scouts? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Someone just earned the Pwned merit badge.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  17. Hiel MPA! by thewiz · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'll post the first obligatory Nazi reference.

    Having been a Scout myself, I can't imagine what possessed them to do this (other than $$$). I think I'll go home and burn all of my Scout awards, etc.

    There was nothing in the Scout oath about being a corporate stooge.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Hiel MPA! by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      I think I'll go home and burn all of my Scout awards, etc.

      Will you make the fire by rubbing two sticks together?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  18. No merit badge for American Boy Scouts? by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

    Why is there no Merit Badge for American Boy Scouts? What happened to the Technology in Education Initiative?

    Wouldn't you think that the faster the youth understands something the faster they can circumvent the system?

    My hats off to you MPA! Thank you for creating the defense lawyers of tomorrow!

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  19. Or.. by Sanity · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984
    Or in Hitler's Germany. Co-opting the youth is a common tactic for those that wish to exercise control over society. This is easy because the youth tend to be more gullible (sorry but its true, Pokemon anyone?).

    The key question is why the education systems we all pay for are facilitating this (although perhaps not in this particular case, many schools in the US have also been willing channels for pro-intellectual property propaganda).

    1. Re:Or.. by Sandbox+Conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kids also make the best soldiers since they lack the life perspective of adults (my theory). I was recently reading an article about Ugandan rebels who kidnap children from orphanages to retrain them into miniature killing machines. The truly chilling part was the brutal unquestioning efficiency with which the children carried out executions of prisoners.

      --
      Why am I on Slashdot? I'm bored. Why am I bored? I'm on Slashdot.
    2. Re:Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That question is easily answered. At least in the US, the entire public education system was designed from the ground up to be a big indoctrination machine for big business and government. Go read Gatto's The Underground History of American Education sometime.

    3. Re:Or.. by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      The key question is why the education systems we all pay for are facilitating this (although perhaps not in this particular case, many schools in the US have also been willing channels for pro-intellectual property propaganda).

      If you would have bothered to RTFH you would have - maybe - noticed that this is in Hong Kong, which last I checked is not a United State of America.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    4. Re:Or.. by brontus3927 · · Score: 1
      The key question is why the education systems we all pay for are facilitating this (<b>although perhaps not in this particular case<b>, many schools in the US have also been willing channels for pro-intellectual property propaganda).

      If you would have bothered to RTFH you would have - maybe - noticed that this is in Hong Kong, which last I checked is not a United State of America.

      If you would have bothered to REFPost you would have - maybe - noticed that he said that there were similar cases in the US. And you just might realize that the Boy Scouts are a school, either.

    5. Re:Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Adults are pretty gullible too. "They hate our freedoms".

    6. Re:Or.. by Sanity · · Score: 1
      If you would have bothered to RTFH you would have - maybe - noticed that this is in Hong Kong, which last I checked is not a United State of America.
      Which, if you would have bothered to read my fucking comment you would have - maybe - noticed the following qualifier:
      although perhaps not in this particular case
    7. Re:Or.. by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      I guess I didn't realize that by "perhaps" you meant "obviously."

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    8. Re:Or.. by deanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, Godwin's Law invoked, so you lose the argument by default.

      Second, that's Hong Kong we're talking about, not the US, at least for this story. ...I agree with everything else you said though.

      The "Polticially Correct" speech that's forced in schools these days IS what was warned about in 1984.

      Those not saying the "right words" are accused of "thought crimes", or "hate speech" just because they used words someone else didn't like. So much for free speech.

    9. Re:Or.. by deanj · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right, people are pretty gullible. It's amazing how many people don't believe that "They hate our freedoms" isn't actually true. It's like the "War for Oil" crapola. Riiiiight!

      It's usually the reactionaries that don't read for themselves, and just have knee-jerk reactions to anything that isn't socialist. Sorry, check the facism at the door bub.... Let people think for themselves.

    10. Re:Or.. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Farenheit 451 is more accurate as far as futuristic dystopias go. In any case, this is definately more Farenheit 451 territory than 1984 territory.

    11. Re:Or.. by GROOFY · · Score: 0

      Godwin's law can not be invoked if the poster is drawing an actually relevant comparison. The idea of Godwin's law is useful to combat those who compare the other party to Hitler or the Nazis without a valid point, but harmful when people use it to say they've won against arguments that make sense. It's like saying "Since you've got nothing else left to say but tell me I'm Hitler, you've lost." This is a world away from "Even though there are actual similarities between the (Chinese) Boy Scouts orginization and the Hitler Youth, you've lost because you mentioned Hitler."

    12. Re:Or.. by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 1

      Apparently the key question is rhetorical. Have you ever been to a public school? We got fed propaganda all the way from K through 12.

      --
      "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
    13. Re:Or.. by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      The truly chilling part was the brutal unquestioning efficiency with which the children carried out executions of prisoners.

      It is a developmental thing. Kids go through stages, one big one in the pre-teen years is rigid and unquestioning obeyance of authority (the inverse of which occurs during the teen years, but then there are other methods of manipulation which work just as well, particularly if you don't care about the longevity or well-being of the teenager).

    14. Re:Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is easy because the youth tend to be more gullible (sorry but its true, Pokemon anyone?).

      You take that back about my pokieman! I liked Pikachu!

    15. Re:Or.. by dangitman · · Score: 1
      I guess I didn't realize that by "perhaps" you meant "obviously."

      Well, I guess that must mean you are too stupid to infer the meaning of a slightly-poorly-worded qualifier. Or otherwise, it means you totally misread the post, and are now backpedalling on technicalities. Or you just skimmed the post and didn't read it properly.

      Come to think of it, "perhaps" isn't even technically wrong in this case. It's just a different writing style. Think about it. "Perhaps" does make linguistic sense in this context.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    16. Re:Or.. by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Firtly, Godwin's law does not mean you "lose the argument by default." It simply says that the discussion ends there. In any case, Godwin was meant to protect against irrelevant mention of the Nazis. Forgive me for reposting my previous post:

      ------

      How is this a Godwin's law violation? Godwin applies to irrelevant analogies to Nazis. In this case, the analogy is perfectly apt. Is it wrong to even mention Nazi Germany or Hitler? If so, then how can we possibly learn from history?

      If we were to apply Godwin in the narrow way that you do, then Godwin's law is worse than useless - it is dangerous and should be scrapped. Honestly, this is getting so fucking ridiculous. Why should Nazi germany be such a forbidden topic, especially when the parallels are becoming more and more relevant to the world we live in today? Seems that many people have lost perspective and unlearned the lessons of WWII due to this prohibition.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:Or.. by nobbin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw something on that as well. I had always assumed that the child soilders thing was because they were short on soilders and children are easy to kidnap. Turns out they're actually pretty great killers I guess its all to do with brain development.Kids lack a clear sense of death , so they dont have any problems with fear. Follow orders without question, its like kids that age especially males are programmed to do what the alpha male says without thinking. And if you've ever seen a bunch of ten year olds ganging up on the kid with the glasses (or whatever) you'll know that they can be completely ruthless. The only thing going against them is the lack of physical strength, but I guess as long as your strong enough to aim and fire an ak, it doesnt really matter.

    18. Re:Or.. by Sanity · · Score: 1
      First, Godwin's Law invoked, so you lose the argument by default.
      Christ, people who smugly mis-invoke Godwin's law really piss me off. Please read Godwin's law.
  20. The Golden Arcade by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Visitors to Hong Kong some years ago may remember the Golden Arcade. It was infamous for bootleg software, movies, video games, and anything else that resides on digital media.

    After that got closed down due to U.S. pressure, they started opening up shops in dark alleys. I remember going to one of those places one time. There was a guy who stood in front of the dark alley way (I think I was 12 years old at the time), and I swear there was a 3-carat diamond attached to each of the numbers on his Rolex (and every one of his teeth, it seemed like). Talk about heaven. Through all the cigarette smoke, I was able to make out things like NT5 alpha CDs and PlayStation games. Those were the days. Although it seemed like you needed pretty good English skills to open up one of these outfits, since most buyers were British or Australian.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    1. Re:The Golden Arcade by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      Places like that still exist. They're just harder to find, and not only because of the police, but because of P2P as well.

      The good thing about Hong Kong is that education until 9th grade is compulsory, and English is taught by default. So most people would be able to communicate in basic English, which is enough to work out deals.

    2. Re:The Golden Arcade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was an expat living in HK. My friends and I hopped on the subway to Sham Shui Po just about every weekend to buy up pirated PC games. The Golden aracde was a tech dream, stall after stall of software/books and hardware. I still have shoeboxes filled with pirated DOS games on 5.25 inch floppies. I loved that place.

    3. Re:The Golden Arcade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the "English skills" part, I was sorta shocked by the fluent English speaking skills of the guys selling pirated CD's/DVD's in Wanchai 188 (I'm sure you know where they are).

      Around last year, I was with a schoolmate of mine wandering in 188, and then suddenly we heard a guy shouting "find the lady in the black jacket (blah blah blah)..." which sounded completely un"chinglish". I mean, my friend and I were persons with confidence in our English skills, and we were completely in awe.

      I didn't know those guys had such good English. No wonder they're saying that University students are getting worse and worse in language skills. I've seen much worse around.

      Perhaps I could find some employment there when I graduate...

      -1 OT ;-p

  21. Japanese by 101percent · · Score: 0, Troll

    Who ever heard of Japanese boyscouts? I thought boyscouts were a Soviet Russia only sort of thing.

    1. Re:Japanese by temcat · · Score: 1

      No, only we had a castrated version of Scout movement called "Pioneers". Very little in common, actually...

    2. Re:Japanese by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Hong Kong is part of the People's Republic of China. It is not part of Japan. But I guess fuckwits like yourself have difficulty in distinguishing them; after all, they're all sliteyes, eh?

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    3. Re:Japanese by 28481k · · Score: 1

      And Hong Kong and Macau are the ONLY places of the PRC which have the Scout Movement. The Mainland retrots itself to the "Pioneers"... And the Scout in Taiwan is still called the Scouts of China...

      --
      28481k
  22. This is ++good! by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that.

    Well, it's a para-military brigade that was originally advertised as a good way to keep young boy's hands busy (i.e. to prevent them... going blind).

    So it's a pretty good choice for an organisation who's been attempting through various means to indoctrinate the next generation into their view on copyrights.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:This is ++good! by Your_Mom · · Score: 1

      Obviously spoken like someone who has either never been or never been part of the program.

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    2. Re:This is ++good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so right, my leader!
      We all now the program is good!
      We love the program!
      Hail program!

    3. Re:This is ++good! by Your_Mom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do the submit and preview keys need to be so close?

      "Obviously spoken like someone who has either never been, or never participated in the program. Your blanket statement reminds me of when Microsoft globally condemns the work of OSS, without even know what it actually does."

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    4. Re:This is ++good! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 0, Troll

      I was a part of the program, but my children won't be. I think tolerance and inclusion are far more important lessons than tying a knot or having a circle jerk about how much we love being Christians.

    5. Re:This is ++good! by 3terrabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hell, we just learned to race pine wood derbies, and how to have fun. It helps when your dad volunteers to be a scout master. Like they say... take an active step in raising your kids.

      Sorry yours had an agenda.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    6. Re:This is ++good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you just have to believe in God to be a Boy Scout.

      Being gay is considered morally corrupt, and is not to be tolerated.

      Being atheist is considered morally corrupt, and is not to be tolerated.

      Tolerating people who are gay or atheist is considered morally corrupt.

    7. Re:This is ++good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, that's why not believing in God gets you kicked out of the Boy Scouts. No, serious, it does. If you say "I don't believe in God," you can no longer be considered a Boy Scout and will get kicked out of your troup.

      And pine wood derbies were for Cub Scouts, not Boy Scouts.

    8. Re:This is ++good! by Reignking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heck, some little idiot 12 year old said that I was Satanic because I was playing with candle wax. And I was kicked out for a month.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    9. Re:This is ++good! by Tassach · · Score: 1
      I think tolerance and inclusion are far more important lessons than tying a knot or having a circle jerk about how much we love being Christians
      If you want a Boy/Girl Scout type organization for your kids without the right wing Christian bias, I suggest you check out Spiral Scouts. Tolerance and inclusion are some of the key values that they teach. Knot tying is optional (but still a useful skill for campers to know).
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    10. Re:This is ++good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do the submit and preview keys need to be so close?

      You're right that some people can't help confusing the two buttons. They should maybe put labels on them, so we know which is which.

    11. Re:This is ++good! by tomjen · · Score: 1

      In Denmark, we have several different scouts, some where christians, some where diehard christians, and some (where i was a member) expected people to find there own religion.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    12. Re:This is ++good! by Your_Mom · · Score: 1

      No. You have to believe in a higher power.

      Not 'God'.
      Not 'A God'.

      Just acknowledge that man is not the end-all be-all of the universe. Which, IMHO, isn't that bad of an idea.

      As for the homophobia that seems to be rampant in Texas (Nation HQ), I'll agree to disagree. (Which, btw, is perfectly fine. You can tolerate in Boy Scouts all you want. No questions asked. I tolerated a ton of assholes during my time there.)

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    13. Re:This is ++good! by Your_Mom · · Score: 1

      Lets try this again. You can say "I don't in God.". You can say "I don't believe in one God" All you need to do is acknowledge that a higher power may or may not be at work.

      Of course, if your troop is in the Bible Belt, this may go straight out the window. Politics is everywhere.

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    14. Re:This is ++good! by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      You're full of shit. Regardless of what you can dig up in any official boy scout document, I know better. I've been in the Boy Scouts. I have friends who were part of the Boy Scouts. The handbook mentions God by name. If you don't beleive in God(yes, the Christian one), you will be ostracized and eventually removed if you don't come around. Troops that aren't like this are the exception, not the rule. Oh, and I live in Washington State. That's not exactly the Bible Belt, is it?

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    15. Re:This is ++good! by Tristandh · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I am what I think Americans would refer to as a scout master (I'm from .be). We build rafts, we send our boys & girls on a 3-day hiking trip, ...
      The point of the whole thing: have fun, and in the mean time try to teach them about things such as functioning within a group, self-reliance, responsibility, ... 'Learning about IP law' and scouting otoh go together like RMS and a razor blade ;-)

    16. Re:This is ++good! by Your_Mom · · Score: 1

      I was in Boy Scouts. I have friends who were part of Boy Scouts. I am a !@##$@ Eagle Scout. I know what the @#$@ I am talking about, I acknowledged that I believed there is the possibility of a higher being during my Eagle review, the reviewers accepted it.

      Personally, a lot of kids in my troop didn't believe in God, the subject was hardly talked about.

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    17. Re:This is ++good! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Your blanket statement reminds me of when Microsoft globally condemns the work of OSS, without even know what it actually does.

      Oh really? My stating facts about Robert Baden-Powell's use of the "idle hands" catch phrase in his early publicity for his para-military brigade reminds you of a megacorporation using its vast ressources to spread FUD about it's competition?

      What an odd thing to say.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    18. Re:This is ++good! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between "higher power" and God then?

      And I'm not sure it's a good idea to acknowledge something that we have no knowledge about!

      Here in the UK when I was in the Scouts, the references were definitely to "God" and not "higher power". I believe that this was technically "any" God (and I think the Girl Guides had changed all their stuff to say "my God"), but in practice this doesn't make much difference: firstly this "any" God still has to be a single God that you have to worship - ruling out atheists/agnostics, polytheists, and theists who believe that God has no influence over the Universe or doesn't care about us, etc.

      Secondly, there were plenty of things (such as ceremonies, religious services, prayers) which were clearly entirely Christian - suddenly the whole idea of "any God" (or higher power) didn't really apply.

      Of course, this is the UK where even state schools have Christian prayers and preaching, so things may be better in other countries.

    19. Re:This is ++good! by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      I apologize for the heated reply, but it seems your experiences in Boy Scouts and mine do not coincide. The Boy Scouts is hardly a homogenous organization, and it seems to me that the environment of any specific troop is highly dependant upon the troop leader and the community that the troop services.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
  23. Thanks for the Idea!! by jimbro2k · · Score: 1

    In partnership with the Boy and Girl Scouts of Amerika, we at McDonalds have helped create a business support merit badge that is earned in just the way you have described.
    [Patent Pending on this business method].

    --
    There is not nearly enough love in the world, but there is far too much trust.
  24. Being from Germany... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984"

    I was actually thinking about some other youth group...

    1. Re:Being from Germany... by o'reor · · Score: 1
      I was actually thinking about some other youth group...

      You though about the IPJugend too ? Wow, I'm glad I'm not alone...

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    2. Re:Being from Germany... by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, they need a corresponding girl group: "Bund IP Mädeln"?

      --

      - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

  25. Civics merit badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So do the HK boy scouts disappear without a trace when the topic of democracy is brought up in their work on a civics merit badge?

  26. First Bruce Lee, now this by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    WTF is wrong with these people?!?!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  27. oh man... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 2

    And I already had problems telling the two BSAs apart...

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  28. Their campaign with the Girl Scouts is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Don't bake with that recipe" campaign promises to end the rampant piracy of thin mints.

  29. Hmmm... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know that Scouts learn by doing things, such as tying knots, building camp fires and so on.

    Does this mean they'll learn about IP by using BitTorrent, Exeem and so on? If so, about 70% of Hong Kong deserves that badge.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the MPA believes that the easiest way to learn about IP is to compose cease & desist letters.

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  30. Goes good next to the Goatse badge... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    I mean honestly you deserve a badge for having seen that image, and it would do just as much good for the youth straight. (pun very much intended)

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  31. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. Where's the "Fuck the Entertainment Industry" badge?

  32. What are the requirements? by pr0t0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apparently, you have to be able construct an FBI warning using nothing but your scarf, a pocketknife, and some damned-fine whittling.

    Please post yours below:

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    1. Re:What are the requirements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you must blind your self by puting a pocket knif in
      each of your eyes..

  33. I Wonder by dmarx · · Score: 1

    If the EFF offered its own course in Intellectual Property, would the Boy Scouts accept completion of that course as meeting the requirements for getting this merit badge?

    --
    "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    1. Re:I Wonder by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      If the EFF offered its own course in Intellectual Property

      That'd be sort of like the Fox giving a tutorial in henhouse construction.

    2. Re:I Wonder by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      That'd be sort of like the Fox giving a tutorial in henhouse construction.

      The EFF is more like the fox building his own henhouse, giving away chickens for free, and putting other henhouses out of business.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:I Wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the EFF offered its own course in Intellectual Property

      That'd be sort of like the Fox giving a tutorial in henhouse construction.


      Actually, you may soon find that the EFF is the
      only thing that keeps you from going to jail for
      singing "Happy Birthday" to your kid.

      When greedy people can buy all the laws they
      want, you better watch what you do and say.

  34. In other news, by DJCacophony · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The organization has also announced new available merit badges in the following categories:

    - Fascism
    - Lawsuits
    - Falsifying evidence
    - Misinterpreting technlologies they don't understand

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  35. No Big Deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy Scouts are dorks anyway. This will probably push some fence-sitters over to music piracy just to avoid any association...

  36. Waste of time.. by Sandbox+Conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Kids should be learning useful life skills such as how to start fires in the wilderness using rudimentary materials found in nature. What's next, a /. moderation merit badge?

    --
    Why am I on Slashdot? I'm bored. Why am I bored? I'm on Slashdot.
    1. Re:Waste of time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids should be learning useful life skills such as how to start fires in the wilderness using rudimentary materials found in nature.

      Extra credit for preparing tasty barbeque'd lawyers over those open fires - now that would earn
      you a public-service merit badge.

  37. Little shits by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why in the hell would the scouts take a position on a politicized issue like this?

    This gives a whole new meaning to "Weblows"

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  38. As an Eagle Scout, by jockeys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel compelled to say that this is utterly wrong. A scout is a lot of things. Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent. But not "aware of copyright laws." I don't recall the Scout Oath containing anything about being a corporate shill for the recording industry; merely promising to do your duty to my God, my country, my community, and myself. This is absurd.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my Napster merit badge for downloading 1000 songs and sharing them on myh college network.

    2. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      A scout is a lot of things. Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent.

      Seems to fit the bill to me. Then again, when I was back in the scouts, we really didn't follow anything. And I am proud to say that I almost made it to scout, after 6 years!

      note: not really. I made it 1 badge short of star, and promptly lost interest.

    3. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think that camping is part of the Scout Law either, but the merit badge does exist. And I fail to see how stamp collecting keeps one morally straight, mentally awake or physically fit.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    4. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by brontus3927 · · Score: 0
      As another Eagle Scout, what do you think doing your duty to your country is? Obeying its laws maybe? From scouting.org: OBEDIENT A Scout follows the rules of his family, school, and troop. He obeys the laws of his community and country. If he thinks these rules and laws are unfair, he tries to have them changed in an orderly manner rather than disobey them.

      Instead of breaking the law and pirating music and movies, a scout should be thrifty and support independent media, which tends to be cheaper and higher quality

    5. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by goldspider · · Score: 1

      From yet another Eagle Scout, AMEN!

      Couldn't have put it better myself!

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    6. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Besides, if a Scout were thrifty, he would continue to copy songs for free...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    7. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, for one, it cuts down on your chances of getting laid...

      (I'm sorry, I couldn't resist)

    8. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 1

      As yet another Eagle Scout, I think perhaps the Boy Scouts are just a little too vulnerable to manipulation by politically-motivated organizations. The purpose of the organization is to mold boys into men of good character, by the standards of the local and national community.

      In my opinion, droids cannot be of good character, because they have no character at all. Therefore, I think the following modification is in order: replace obedient with dutiful. Blind obedience to authority is definitely not a virtue, and I always bristled at the implication that it was my solemn duty to carry out the commands of complete idiots.

      And in regard to having them changed in an orderly manner, the scouting office seems to be suffering from a lack of familiarity with reality. The only feasible ways to change an unjust law are with large-scale protests and with large-scale bribes. It is your duty to disobey an unjust law, especially when obeying it can cause harm to another. Not that this principle has any specific application to copyright, of course...

      --
      "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
    9. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an Eagle Scout too and I see nothing wrong with this. Respecting other people's intellectual property is the right thing to do, is it not? It sickens me to see all the posts here blasting it as if intellectual property were inherently evil. It's not. Lots of big name companies abuse it to get more than their fair share, but that doesn't make IP itself wrong. Any creative person or organization is entitled to have ownership of their own work. Simple as that!

      Sheesh. And I keep wondering why I always come back here...

  39. Those with tinfoil hats... by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984.

    Is it OK for those of us without tinfoil hats to think the same thing?

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    1. Re:Those with tinfoil hats... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1

      Sure, you just get a little more static than we do.

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  40. Good Training... by ChaosCube · · Score: 2, Funny

    Personally, I can't think of anything better than training young people to rat out their friends and families, all the while standing up for the rights of IP owners like Disney. We don't want those poor Hollywood bums to go broke do we?

    Definitely Orwellian.

    --
    BDR Gear
    Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
    1. Re:Good Training... by sexybomber · · Score: 1

      And I quote...

      "training young people to rat out their friends and families"

      Doesn't that violate the Scout Oath's (or Law, or whatever in the seven hells it is) tenets of being "trustworthy" and "loyal"?

    2. Re:Good Training... by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 1

      Nope. They will simply be trustworthy and loyal to the media industry.

    3. Re:Good Training... by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 1

      Not if you are being "trustworthy" and "loyal" to the MPAA

  41. Significantly Off Topic... by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does the Hong Kong Boys Scouts Association have a drifting and automobile customization patch?

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
  42. Sieg Heil! by phantomvortex · · Score: 1

    Quoted: "Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984." Or maybe the Hitler Youth.

    1. Re:Sieg Heil! by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Closer in geography, try Mao's Red Guards -- although Scouts are probably a bit younger.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  43. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America, Entertainment Industry fucks YOU!

  44. Mod Parent Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-P

  45. can they get a merit badge... by Cursive23 · · Score: 0

    in DDoSing the networks of enemy nations?

  46. I guess I should be thankful... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    That we don't have a "Young Patriot" merit badge here in the US.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:I guess I should be thankful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, what an idea... now, let's hope nobody in the GOP reads the /.

  47. What about tomorrow? by kamikazejay · · Score: 1

    I think it's sad that my children will grow up in a world where true freedom of speech won't exist.

    Another thing, if people start to let this kind of thing exist in the world, what will be next? Our children being brainwashed by the large corperations, those big enough to no doubt supply the $$$ to 'encourage' this.

    It is bad enough with the TV telling them they 'need' the latest action toy, but that doesnt quite have the same effect as trying to make them earn it, as if it is something to be proud of.

  48. I have an idea for several by FreeUser · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Here are several merit badges foreign powers could "suggest" (strong-arm) the Boy Scouts of America to include...in the interests of fair balance, cultural exchange, and all that:

    1) Suicide Bomber Merit Badge (sponsor: Saddam Hussein Regime in Exile)

    2) Suicide Pilot Merit Badge (sponsor: Al Q'aida)

    3) Cheese and Wine Merit Badge (sponsor: France)

    4) Diplomacy Merit Badge (sponsor: the whole of the Earth outside of the USA, note attached reads "Please America, learn this one well!")

    5) Cooperative and Free Culture Merit Badge (sponsor: the whole of the non-western world that still remembers a time when the people owned their culture, not the copyright cartels of faceless corporations).

    6) P2P Merit Badge (sponsor: every tech-savvy person under the age of 40)

    I'm sure there are others, like remedial courses in the separation of church and state, tolerance for women, tolerance for gays, and so on, but the list grows rather onerous quite quickly.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:I have an idea for several by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      P2P Merit Badge (sponsor: every tech-savvy person under the age of 40)

      Why under the age of 40? What magical thing happens then? Or do you only tolerate gays and women until they wrinkle or sag.....?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    2. Re:I have an idea for several by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      P2P Merit Badge (sponsor: every tech-savvy person under the age of 40)

      Why under the age of 40? What magical thing happens then? Or do you only tolerate gays and women until they wrinkle or sag.....?


      Homor is obviously a difficult concept, and knee jerk enforcement of political correctness a widespread disease.

      HINT: The entire notion of merit badges, be they P2P or "Suicide Bomber" merit badges, was a JOKE. C.f. Humor.

      HINT 2: (though it shouldn't be necessary to qualify it, apparently to some microscopically minded PC-thought police, it is) I am over 40.

      Even innocuous jokes like these can apparently offend the ultra-thin skinned (cue accusation of racism/agism here). Get over it, and grow a sense of humor.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    3. Re:I have an idea for several by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1
      3) Cheese and Wine Merit Badge (sponsor: France)
      Hell, I'll sponsor that one, maybe along with a "Beer that doesn't suck" merit badge (sponsor: Germans, Irish, hell, even the Canadians can come)!

      I might have stayed in scouts longer if we had had those.
      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    4. Re:I have an idea for several by ed__ · · Score: 2, Funny

      how about

      Government Oppression Merit Badge (sponser: US/China/somecountryyoudon'tlike):
      Do all of the following:
      1. Become a party member
      2. Join a mob action intended to silence a group of citizens
      3. Burn books which have been found to be 'subversive'
      4. Find 6 subversive people in your family or community.
      5. Have them sent to work camps.

      other badges:
      Fascism Badge
      Torture Badge (US Army MP's/former South American regimes/school of the americas).
      WMD Search Merit Badge
      Using Fear as a Tool to dominate the citzenry Merit Badge(that one's a little long...think of better name: Better Living through Fear Merit Badge).
      Internet Censorship Badge (China again!)
      Regime Change Badge

      Foreign Intelligence Merit Badge (CIA/Pentagon)
      do two of the following:
      1. make up shit
      2. fact check maybe
      3. invade someone's 3rd world ass

      hopefully everyone has been offended. if not please take the next 5 minutes to offend yourself.

    5. Re:I have an idea for several by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

      "Diplomacy Merit Badge" Or how to lie through your teeth and bluff under extreme duress

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:I have an idea for several by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      No. I got the humor in the whole P2P merit badge thing except for the under 40 part. It was a legit question and since you seemed to be more serious with your comment regarding women and gays I thought I'd tweak you by pointing out the discrepancy. Kind of like when I nailed an "environmentalist" friend of mine who was ticketed for burning the plastic insulation off of old telephone wire to get to the copper.... on Earth Day.

      I'm neither offended, nor thin-skinned and I can't get over it 'cause I never had it.

      And I'm certainly not PC (though I thought you might be).

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    7. Re:I have an idea for several by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      Kind of like when I nailed an "environmentalist" friend of mine who was ticketed for burning the plastic insulation off of old telephone wire to get to the copper.... on Earth Day.

      Heh! There is indeed humor in that. As to the over/under 40 thing, there is a generational discrepency between those using P2P and those pushing for legislation to ban it. That doesn't mean those of us over 40 (or 50, or 60...) can all be lumped into the RIAA/MPAA category, but one look at the leaders of those groups, and the politicians who enact their will, and one does see a very strong generational divide. It isn't politically correct to note the agist aspects of this reality, but it is true nevertheless, and none of us should be intimidated into not speaking of the obvious.

      That of course doesn't excuse any discrimination or other agist behavior against those over [insert arbitrary number here], but it does serve to show a socialogical relationship (and change in attitudes over time) and point out what group(s) may need reaching out to and education if we are to get out from under the architectures of control the patent and copyright cartels have held us under for the last several centuries. Not that we're all that likely to succeed, but it never hurts to try.

      And I'm certainly not PC (though I thought you might be).

      I may be liberal (a dirty word here in the US, which shows just how little we as a people know about anything), but I'm anything but PC. In fact, I oppose any dogma (and "PC" is a form of dogma, whether it's the liberal "PC" of the ninetees or the newer, conservative "PC" of the naughties). Knock down, drawn out arguments over issues are far healthier than PC-enforced silence ... even if the non-PC point of view is despicable and vile (e.g. racist points of view). I guess this is a long winded way of saying "I may despise what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it" which is something a lot of people pay lip service to, but don't really support when they burn a singer's records for speaking out against the president's asinine policies in Iraq, or try to silence some pro-Bush right-winger because they find what s/he says offensive (as I probably would, even while defending their right to say it and be heard).

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  49. could be good or bad by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    I think this could be either a good or a bad thing, depending on implementation. I'm all for people being better educated about copyright/patent/trademark law, so long as they present the issues from all sides. Remember, copyright does serve a useful purpose, and even Lawrence Lessig doesn't advocate abolishing it completely, just limiting its scope to be more reasonable.

    1. Re:could be good or bad by 3terrabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe the scouts also get to learn about barratry, buying politicians, ripping off artists, and price fixing! Boy scouts might finally be able to outsell those Girl Scout Cookies!

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  50. www.goat.cx just got dremel'd by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0, Troll

    Go have a peek, it's hilarious!

  51. So... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
    Do you get extra points for turning in your parents?

    Scouting should be training young minds to do the honorable thing. Unauthorized copying is not honorable, no matter how much we despise the corporations holding the copyright. A more sensible approach would be to organize a boycott of abusive corporations... I wonder if they can get a merit badge for that?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is unauthorized copying "not honorable"?

    2. Re:So... by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      There is nothing "honorable" or "dishonorable" about it. It is illegal.

    3. Re:So... by Chirs · · Score: 1

      How do you define "unauthorized"? Authorized by whom?

      The government has said I have certain "fair use" rights. In essence, they have "authorized" me to copy under certain conditions. The corporations are trying their hardest to prevent me from exercising them. Which takes precendence?

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's perfectly honorable.

      but i guess i don't believe in intellectial property.

    5. Re:So... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      How is violating the GPL (e.g. as SCO has done) not honorable?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:So... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      So it's ok for anybody that wants to to violate the GPL? Laws are laws... they cut both ways. It is only when they don't apply equally to everyone that I get upset.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:So... by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      How is violating the GPL (e.g. as SCO has done) not honorable?
      You do understand that the real world is not a huge playground, where "if you stick out your tongue at me, I will bend your plastic shovel" principles rule supreme. Grow up.
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright violation is copyright violation. Apparently you are too stupid to realize that, and unable to come up with any rational arguments, so you resort to name-calling. Who is being juvenille here?

    9. Re:So... by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      Copyright violation is copyright violation. Apparently you are too stupid to realize that, and unable to come up with any rational arguments, so you resort to name-calling. Who is being juvenille here?
      Fex humanum.
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
  52. Brazil by JustinPrine · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Don't suspect a friend, report them."

  53. 1984? by tktk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."

    Orwell was an optimist.

    1. Re:1984? by khujifig · · Score: 1

      Someone once asked Orwell if there was a moral to Nineteen Eighty-Four, to which he replied "Don't let it happen!"

      Oh well.

    2. Re:1984? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Off-topic, but what the heck...

      Quick copy-paste from this page.

      * Orwell's 1984 was obviously influenced and perhaps inspired by a book called We, a nearly forgotten totalitarian fantasy by Russian Writer Eugene Zamiatin. We was written in 1923. translated into English by Manhattan Psychiatrist Gregory Zilboorg and published in the U.S. in 1924. Orwell read it in a French translation in 1946 and wrote an enthusiastic review of it in London's weekly Tribune, of which be was then literary editor. Orwell's is the better book in every way, but his debt to We is quickly apparent. In the Russian's novel the characters live in glass houses where state agents can watch them; in 1984 they are spied on by "telescreen." Zamiatin's dictator, the Benefactor, is a counterpart of Orwell's Big Brother. In both, a love affair leads to the hero's undoing. In both, he rebels against the state, is trapped, punished and spiritually crushed. Zamiatin died in Paris in 1937.
      The original russian text can be found on lib.ru

      Dead tree translation available from (for example) amazon.

  54. Mod Me Down Troll (-1) by coolGuyZak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's next, a /. moderation merit badge?
    What's the point? Noone would qualify.

  55. already in states by DSLAMngu · · Score: 1, Informative
    A recognition of intellectual property as it applies to software is already a requirement to earn the Computers merit badge in the Boy Scouts of America. However, it's a pretty weak yes or no:

    8. Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?

    The full requirement list can be found here.

    I still stole software before and after earning the badge, and pretty much all of my troop members traded games and stole music like any other typical set of adolescent men.

    However, as an Eagle Scout, I have changed my stance and was disappointed that this merit badge didn't make it to the states.

    1. Re:already in states by Reignking · · Score: 1

      However, as an Eagle Scout, I have changed my stance and was disappointed that this merit badge didn't make it to the states.

      That merit badge is part of BSA...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    2. Re:already in states by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      However, it's a pretty weak yes or no:

      8. Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?

      It's only weak if the sponsor for the badge is lax in his grading. There are equally valid reasons for both sides of the question. The question isn't looking for an answer. It's looking for a justification of the answer.

    3. Re:already in states by DSLAMngu · · Score: 1

      Erm Disappointed that IP didn't make it Sorry

  56. Just following the Jesuits ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1
    Pope Leo XIII's letter 'Rerum Novarum' of 1891

    • aah those Jesuits! Give me a boy to the age of six, and I will give you the man!

    I think that Stalin said something similar and it is why Bill Gates is so keen to get his software into schools .....

    1. Re:Just following the Jesuits ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pope Leo XIII's letter 'Rerum Novarum' of 1891

      * aah those Jesuits! Give me a boy to the age of six, and I will give you the man!


      That was 1891. Recently, it was revised to just:
      "Give me a boy"

  57. Orwell eh? by deangelo · · Score: 1

    Funny I was thinking Hitlers Youth.

  58. Orwell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Orwell isn't enough here. Try Hitlerjugend.

  59. I.P. Freely by mathmatt · · Score: 1

    with a better understanding of the value of intellectual property

    No I have a better understanding.

    Signed
    I.P. Freely

  60. In the US... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    Would you get the badge for making a back-up of your software pursuant to 107 of the Copyright Act or a mix tape for your friends pursuant to the Home Recording Act?

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  61. This is not what you think by some1somewhere · · Score: 3, Informative

    As usual, the media distorts the picture.

    Actually, this "badge" is useless. The number of kids going around buying copy PS2 games, CDs, etc. is amazing in Hong Kong. I'd say over 99% of PS2 games, software, DVDs, etc. in Hong Kong are copies/counterfeit. No doubt, they'll just get the badge and continue on their merry way as usual.

    Counterfeit software and goods is a way of life and culture in Hong Kong, China, and many places in Asia. You have "Woman's Street", which is an ENTIRE long street dedicated to fake goods. You even have police patrolling the area to keep it safe from pickpockets! But they are never shut down. Go there to find your "LV" bags, "Dior" rings, and "Rolex" watches.

    In fact, now that they have made it safer to go to these places, MORE tourists are turning up. There are less seedy types and more goods now.

    So I really think this is a pointless exercise. Now that China and HK are working together more, even MORE copy stuff is going to HK. And with HK's famous low crime rate and focus on making money and business, it is the IDEAL place to get these kind of things: total safe, cheap, available everywhere.

    --
    **FREE** Track and view your phone's via CellID and/or WIFI and/or GPS :- http://tinyurl.com/la6fhd
  62. GPL = IP ? by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shouldn't that be included under the IP merit badge, since it protects the intellectual property of open source developers.

  63. Computers Merit Badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note the current requirement #8 for Computers Merit Badge in the U.S.: http://www.meritbadge.com/mb/036.htm

    1. Re:Computers Merit Badge by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Use a computer attached to a local area network or equipped with a modem to connect to a computer network or bulletin-board service such as Prodigy, CompuServe, or America Online. Send a message to someone on the network or download a program or file from the network.

      More corporate shills! Or, they need to update the requirements :)

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    2. Re:Computers Merit Badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?"

      I have a feeling "Yes, if the game is freely distributable" won't work for that...

    3. Re:Computers Merit Badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note the current requirement #8 for Computers Merit Badge in the U.S.:

      8. Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?


      Yes it is, for the time being.
      My friend writes programs and games.

      I do suspect that it won't be too long before
      he will be risking jail time for daring to write
      software.

  64. DARE by dr7greenthumb · · Score: 1

    I guess they took a lesson from the DARE program for gettings kids to rat out friends/family.

  65. Morals? by mosb1000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought the Boy Scouts were supposed to morals and leadership skills to future generations. I think respecting other peoples IP falls under the morals category. They already teach you not to plagiarize other peoples work, which is really the same thing, so I don't see why you find this so upsetting. I suppose next you were about to complain that they teach kids not to cheat on tests.

    1. Re:Morals? by Interrupt18 · · Score: 2

      Plagiarism, broadly, is passing off someones work as your own. In any context, it is easy to see why this is wrong (immoral).

      'IP' is defined differently depending on the country, organization etc. Learning to respect IP is very context dependant.

      The two are different.

    2. Re:Morals? by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      They already teach you not to plagiarize other peoples work, which is really the same thing

      No, its not. Plagirising is passing off someone else's work as your own. It's lying and stealing the credit from someone else. Then there is the copyright violation.

      This is a tricky issue. Yes it is wrong to pirate (or infringe on copyright or whatever). But then the entertainment industry has done some illegal things as well. There is a lot of grey area here.

      Problem is that kids are very impressionable and they look at things in black ind white, good guys and bad guys. If the pirates are the bad guys then the recording industry must be the good guys, right? Problem is that the recording industy breaks the law all the time (and then buys their way out of it).

      IP issues are very messy. So messy that lawyers and judges have trouble making sense of them. The boy scouts should be above such an ugly issue.

    3. Re:Morals? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      look at things in black ind white, good guys and bad guys

      much like slashdot right?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:Morals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You smell like troll; I'm responding only because your history is spotless.

      I thought the Boy Scouts were supposed to morals and leadership skills to future generations.

      I thought they were designed to prepare kids to join the military aka become killbots.

      I think respecting...

      Respect is earned.

      ...other peoples IP...

      There is no such thing as IP. One cannot own ideas.

      They already teach you not to plagiarize other peoples work, which is really the same thing.

      Falsely claiming authorship and nonprofit copying is the same?

      I suppose next you were about to complain that they teach kids not to cheat on tests

      That's called a strawman. Its bad form.

    5. Re:Morals? by globalar · · Score: 1

      Law and the obedience of said law is not morality. Morality is not coerced and I do not believe it should be.

      Now, I agree, scouts should understand the law and obedience is to be stressed. But things are not that simple.

      This is clearly lobbying at younger minds by feeding them one interpretation of the law. It is analogous to instilling the right to an abortion via a merit badge. Not that abortion is wrong (not opening a debate here), but the political ramifications are that one view is being fed to the relatively young scouts. Because abortion is controversial, education on the issue should include why some people oppose it.

      Leadership and morality require, above all, education on opposing views. IP is a controversial area and should be taught as such. I seriously doubt that is what these scouts are getting. It's possible to look at IP in less biased way, but really can we expect corporations to provide us with this?

    6. Re:Morals? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      "There is no such thing as IP. One cannot own ideas."

      Well, why is plagiarism immoral? Everyone can agree that trying to pass off someone else's idea as your own is wrong, doesn't that imply that you have some control over how your ideas are disseminated? What is property? The ability to control the use of an object. Therefore, since plagiarism is immoral, the existence of intellectual property is implied.

      "Falsely claiming authorship and nonprofit copying is the same?"

      I did not make any statement regarding what intellectual property rights should be reserved. I merely said that it exists, and respecting intellectual property is important.

      "I suppose next you were about to complain that they teach kids not to cheat on tests

      That's called a strawman."

      No it's not, it's called poking fun at the poster.

      "Its bad form."

      I know, it's hard to resist.

    7. Re:Morals? by alexo · · Score: 1


      > Well, why is plagiarism immoral?

      Keep reading...

      > Everyone can agree that trying to pass off someone else's idea as your own is wrong,

      So far, so good...

      > doesn't that imply that you have some control over how your ideas are disseminated?

      Absolutely not.

      Plagiarism is wrong because it is lying, not because some implied ownership.

      Providing the exact name of the logical fallacy used by mosb1000 to "prove" the point is left as an excercise to the reader.

    8. Re:Morals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That analogy falls through. With plagorism, you're passing off someone's work as your own. I don't think anyone's trying to say they're the one singing pop songs or playing the hero in a movie.

    9. Re:Morals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Respect is earned.

      Respect can be taught. As a child you are taught to respect elders, if you continue to use that same behavior as an adult that is your choice. Respect is something that goes hand in hand with morals. Those without morals have no respect for anyone, and those with morals should have respect for everyone.

      There is no such thing as IP. One cannot own ideas

      Of course you can own ideas. I could be very wrong here but don't things happen because of ideas which then become owned by those who had them? (not all cases but some)

      Falsely claiming authorship and nonprofit copying is the same?

      If you are just copying without taking ownership, what seems to be the problem? Had you said this is the recipe for (Brand of soft drink). I first made it in 1967...." that's lying, and that is wrong. That is stealing, immoral and is disrespectful to the company.

    10. Re:Morals? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      "Plagiarism is wrong because it is lying, not because some implied ownership."

      Why is plagiarism lying? I thought you said that I ideas don't belong to anyone, doesn't that mean that I have as valid a claim to a piece of writing as anyone else?

    11. Re:Morals? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Why is plagiarism lying?

      Uh...because it requires claiming something that isn't true. It really isn't that hard to understand, you know.

    12. Re:Morals? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Okay, what does it imply that isn't true?

    13. Re:Morals? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      That the person who did the plagiarism was the one who created the work that ended up being plagiarized.

      Are you normally this dense, or are you deliberately misunderstanding simple word definitions?

    14. Re:Morals? by alexo · · Score: 1


      > Are you normally this dense, or are you deliberately misunderstanding simple word definitions?

      My guess is: both.

    15. Re:Morals? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Right, that's my point, the idea is tied to the person who created it. It is their intellectual property. This isn't fucking rocket science, maybe you're the one who's dense.

  66. So, what are you working on ? by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scout A: I'm working on the whitewater kayaking badge.

    Scount B: I'm working on the wilderness survival badge.

    Scout C: I'm working on the Intellectual Property badge.

    Scouts A & B: Whoa! Cool!

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  67. IP troubles by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    Ofcourse, that would become problematic if they want to use the GPL or a CC licence for their IP. ;-)

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  68. "Doing what is right"? by lxt · · Score: 1

    ...so, when did "doing what is right" not include "honoring the law"??? Much as we all hate it, that's what it is...

  69. Just a question by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But who's this going to effect, the kids who go to Boy Scouts are more likely to be the ones who don't pirate films

    The kids who sit at home on Kazaa and doing stuff other than helpful 'community building' activites will be most of the people who pirate things. Nice targetting MPAA. doh!

    1. Re:Just a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice bit of stereotyping. Good work!

    2. Re:Just a question by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Kids that don't pirate stuff? Where have you been?

  70. similar in the USA by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As an Eagle Scout who earned the "Computers" merit badge, I'm glad the Boy Scouts of America hasn't gotten this bad yet...However, the american computers merit badge isn't much better. It's quite outdated. The book pictures a 5 1/4-inch floppys and dot matrix printers as modern hardware. It also makes no refrence to GPL software including GNU/Linux. It implies software piracy is wrong but does not mention freedom and shareing as important values. Hopefully progress can be made. The free software movement is reaching out to scouting.

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7813/

    The BSA needs to respond.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  71. On my honor... by jkirby · · Score: 1

    Yada yada yada ... and I promis not to steal intellectual property... yada yada yada ... before god and country ... yada yada yada

    --
    Jamey Kirby
    1. Re:On my honor... by belmolis · · Score: 1

      It could go beyond meaningless words. For instance, in the New Boy Scouts (TM), if you start to help an old lady across the street and she mentions that she has been downloading MP3s of hymns, you're supposed to abandon her so that she gets run over. :)

    2. Re:On my honor... by northwind · · Score: 1

      Stasi used to do just that in the old East-block

    3. Re:On my honor... by belmolis · · Score: 1

      They had MP3s in the pre-1990 East-block?

    4. Re:On my honor... by northwind · · Score: 1

      At least 3 MPs......

  72. Could be a good thing... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...since surely the first step in changing unjustly-attained corporate sponsored IP law is educating people why it is such a bad thing in and of itself.

    "Copying a shitty CD will get me fined a billion dollars and raped in prison? That law sucks! Where do I sign up to change it?"

    Also, I don't know if scouts in other countries is much like scouts here in the UK, but we used to make our own music, perhaps they could encourage these kids to create stuff instead of stealing/copying-with-infringement (delete as applicable) the shit the corporate machine is spewing out.

    1. Re:Could be a good thing... by northwind · · Score: 1

      I agree, but actually it goes further than that:
      What about those politicians who have demonstrated their incompetence by enacting a law that penalizes people more for download copying than shoplifting?
      Because that is what it amounts to.
      Of course not to speak about physical violence where a person is being hurt. Sorry - you are not incorporated. You are just a person. This is nowhere as bad as downloading.
      Get your (politicians) priorities straight: First people - then people - then people then animals and then corporations.

    2. Re:Could be a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I don't know if scouts in other countries is much like scouts here in the UK, but we used to make our own music,

      Used to is the operative word.
      If you are wondering why they don't now, it's
      because the R*AA has copyrights on all the good
      notes and all conceivable arrangements of those
      notes. The Scounts don't want to pay a fee every
      time a kid hums a tune.

  73. Want some candy little boy...? by wileynet · · Score: 1

    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984

    Actually it reminds me more of Joe Camel. Recruit them when they are young and easily manipulated. The twisted youth of today will be your army of tomorrow.

  74. badge design released by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

    An early draft of the badge design can be found here:

    http://img226.echo.cx/img226/3209/ipbadge9cz.jpg

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  75. Or maybe you have things backwards by beer_maker · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984.

    Or in Hitler's Germany.

    Ignoring the Goodwin's Law violation, you might ask yourself why Hitler created the Hitler Youth organization, when the Boy Scouts already existed in Germany. Perhaps it was because the Boy Scout organization had different goals, not in keeping with National Socialism? The Scouting Organization was (and is) not the problem

    Co-opting the youth is a common tactic for those that wish to exercise control over society. This is easy because the youth tend to be more gullible (sorry but its true, Pokemon anyone?).
    I would agree with the previous poster's point about lack of life experience rather than yours of gullibility - most kids are more idealistic that adults, not less. BTW, your "co-opting the youth" is another person's "getting the kids involved in the community", which we all think is fine when it's a Linux Installfest, right?
    The key question is why the education systems we all pay for are facilitating this (although perhaps not in this particular case, many schools in the US have also been willing channels for pro-intellectual property propaganda).
    Sorry, I don't get your point - what do Boy Scouts in Hong Kong have to do with "the educational system we all pay for" ... if you are posting from Hong Kong you might want to so indicate. I don't see any signs the US educational system is participating in this event at all. (Yes, I am posting from the US, as are most people reading this - not all, but definitely most.)
    --
    Hmmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    1. Re:Or maybe you have things backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foolish idealism, in most cases simply following others (who can be completely nuts, or true geniuses) with grand beliefs.

    2. Re:Or maybe you have things backwards by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Ignoring the Goodwin's Law violation,

      How is this a Godwin's law violation? Godwin applies to irrelevant analogies to Nazis. In this case, the analogy is perfectly apt. Is it wrong to even mention Nazi Germany or Hitler? If so, then how can we possibly learn from history?

      If we were to apply Godwin in the narrow way that you do, then Godwin's law is worse than useless - it is dangerous and should be scrapped. Honestly, this is getting so fucking ridiculous. Why should Nazi germany be such a forbidden topic, especially when the parallels are becoming more and more relevant to the world we live in today? Seems that many people have lost perspective and unlearned the lessons of WWII due to this prohibition.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Or maybe you have things backwards by beer_maker · · Score: 1
      Damn, I completely missed that - you are absolutely correct, this was NOT a Godwin's (d'oh!) Law violation at all!

      OTOH, I still disagree with the poster's conflation of the Boy Scouts with the Hitler Youth and its fellow Nazi organizations. And I call BS on the doomsaying, too. The one thing history teaches us is that every age thinks theirs is the worst ever, that things are falling apart, etc.

      Tell you what, you list your version of "the lessons of WWII" and I'll be happy to discuss them. Fair enough?

      --
      Hmmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  76. The next merit badge they come up with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next merit badge they come up with should be "Protecting Your Bung Hole from the Scout Master"

  77. Honor someone else's property? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    "doing the right thing"

    In that case they should come up with a badge with Disney on it called "Whining to Congress until you get copyright laws extended for a period close to 100 yrs so you never have to put anything into the public domain even though many of your ideas originated from the public domain."

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  78. Its....... by northwind · · Score: 1

    Bicycle Repair Man....
    Somebody remember "Troop Beverly Hills" ?
    Next up will be badges for:
    "Can count to 10 on one hand" and
    "Have watched all 350 episodes of Simpsons consecutively"

    Geez

  79. Sure the was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There was nothing in the Scout oath about being a corporate stooge.


    The Scout Oath includes "to obey the Scout Law". The Scout Law includes Trustworthy, Friendly, Obiedient, and Thrifty. Can you not be trusted with other peoples Intellectual Property? Are you not obedient to the laws? Thrifty does not mean steal it to save money. If you can't be friendly w/o sharing copyrighted material, do you have friends or leaches?


    Maybe you should turn in your card.


    Not that I really like the idea of a merit badge designed by a corporation.

  80. The thing that has me worried.. by Striikerr · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm just worried about this quote..
    " Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."

    I mean how did they know that I was thinking about the youth in Orwell's 1984 when I had my best tinfoil hat on?!? Obviously they have found a way to bypass the tried and true method to block mind control/reading.. Perhaps it's time to look towards different foil types?

  81. We don't want to be giving them more little boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's already a big enough problem with Catholic preists and little boys.

  82. Re:So - more corporate shills by NixLuver · · Score: 1

    The corporate shill part comes from the connection of 'honor' with a system created by companies who have subverted the entire intent of the copyright systems into some perverse "Intellectual Properties" concept that allows a company to essentially own thoughts that exist in your head, or your own memories. Until Disney and the *AA began lobbying Washington, it was a purely civil matter, because everyone understood that physical property was something completely different. The propaganda campaign of the big IP corporations has been extremely successful; of course, big campaign contributions don't hurt.

  83. No need for fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."

    And those whose grandparents survived the holocaust might be thinking of the non-fictional Hitler Youth.

  84. This is so sad by a3217055 · · Score: 1

    There is no more innocence.

  85. Ask a Catholic about it ... by crimethinker · · Score: 1
    Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?

    I think you should ask the Catholic Church, particularly Cardinals Bernard Law and Roger Mahoney, about the wisdom of putting homosexuals in charge of young boys.

    Think about this: scouts go camping. Would you send your daughter on a campout, miles away from civilization, with a heterosexual man? So why should someone send their son into the same situation with a homosexual? The BSA' policy makes sense. They're just too polite to draw the parallel to the homosexual pedophile priest scandal.

    -paul

    --
    Pistol caliber is like religion: everyone has their favourite, and theirs is the only right choice.
    1. Re:Ask a Catholic about it ... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      The bigger problems with the Catholic Church is that it doesn't allow its priests to get married or have sex. That's biologically irresponsible, and can drive people to do things they wouldn't otherwise. There's also the unspoken/subliminal drive to move gays into the priesthood, because if you don't want to marry a woman, you might as well...

      That said, the amount of child molesters who are gay is proportional to the amount who are straight. This goes for those who abuse both boys and girls. Translated, most people who sexually abuse boys are straight men.

    2. Re:Ask a Catholic about it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, the amount of child molesters who are gay is proportional to the amount who are straight.

      That sentence appears on the surface to communicate a complete thought, but it is missing an important detail. Namely, what is the proportion?

      [M]ost people who sexually abuse boys are straight men.

      That is dictionarily impossible, to coin a phrase. If a man, a male adult, is having a sexual affair with a boy, a male child, he is by definition not straight.

    3. Re:Ask a Catholic about it ... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      He wasn't talking about pedophiles and you know it.

      He was talking about gay men and hormonally active, sexually confused teenage boys.

      You wouldn't put a group of teenage girls in the care of a man over the weekend in the woods unless you were irresponsible and wanted a sexual incident.

      Why are gay men different?

    4. Re:Ask a Catholic about it ... by garote · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, makes sense, if you think like a typical corn-fed homophobe American, and assume tha

      1. Your average gay man is also a sexual predator.

      2. The crusade to keep the male-bonding that occurs in the scouts "non-sexual" is anything but a lost cause and a damaging wild goose-chase.

      What are you going to do, you poor fearful soul, when it's not the scoutmaster who's gay or bi-curious or experimenting, but THE SCOUTS doing it, groping each other in dark tents, sharing the occasional experimental kiss out in a fishing boat, as they slowly learn about sexuality? Where will you hide them then? Seriously, your only good solution in these conflicts is to realize that homosexual behavior is not a big deal. If you make it one, you're bound to alienate and/or destroy a fair percentage of your own offspring.

      P.S.: The Catholic Church's official stance on this is damaging, and indefensible. I'm through talking with them.

  86. Boy scouts scare me by hyfe · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Partly offtopic, but I just have to say it:

    Boy scouts scare the shit out of me.

    Small children required to stand at attention, swearing oats they don't understand. Small children learning obidience to elders, to an organisation out of their parents control. Ever read about that anywhere? (this was a core element in italic/german fascism for the knowledge-impaired)

    Sure, the organisation is benign and all nice and stuff now, but will it stay that way?

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    1. Re:Boy scouts scare me by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Scout Promise

      On my honour,

      I promise that I will do my best,

      To do my Duty to God and the Queen,

      To help other people at all times,

      And to carry out the spirit of the Scout Law.

      The Scout Law

      A Scout is

      Helpful and trustworthy,

      Kind and cheerful,

      Considerate and clean,

      And wise in the use of all resources.

      You're right, that's pretty scary. "Do my best"? I mean that's obviously training them to be corporate pawns. "Kind and Cheerful"? What sort of Commie trick is that?

      The people running scouts ARE parents.

    2. Re:Boy scouts scare me by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Well, that appears to be the UK version, no for the US version.

      On my honor, I will do me best, To do my duty to God and my country, and to obey the Scout Law, to help other people at all times, to keep my self physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight.

      A scout is trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, curtious, kind, obeidient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent.

      Scout Modo: Do a good turn daily.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:Boy scouts scare me by hyfe · · Score: 1
      You don't actually think Hitler Jugend thaught to 'be evil and mean and generally fuck people up' do you? Everybody put in the good stuff, what matters is what else they put in there.

      A line like 'Duty to God and the Queen' may not mean much now, but in the right context it could. I'm not scared of what the scouts are, insofar what they easily could become (is that sentence correct btw? .. not a native speaker)

      Oh, and I'll assume you're either trolling, an idiot or using a gimmick with those commie references. Boy scouts have fascist roots, not commie.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    4. Re:Boy scouts scare me by Edward+Faulkner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Small children required to stand at attention, swearing oats they don't understand. Small children learning obidience to elders, to an organisation out of their parents control.

      Scouting is entirely within their parents control, because nobody can sign up without parental permission, and the vast majority of the people running things are parents.

      You comment does apply to public school however, where parents truly lack control, and children are truly taught to love and obey the State.

      For me, scouting was an excellent antidote to school. I got to accomplish real things. Unlike in school.

      --
      "The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern." - Lord Acton
    5. Re:Boy scouts scare me by cranos · · Score: 1

      Sorry do they actually use the phrase "morally straight?"

    6. Re:Boy scouts scare me by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1
      Small children required to stand at attention, swearing oaths they don't understand. Small children learning obedience to elders, to an organisation out of their parents control.
      Which is exactly what they do every day that they're in school. That's a problem how exactly?

      Sure, the organisation is benign and all nice and stuff now, but will it stay that way?
      They've barely changed in the 90-something years that they've been in existance in the U.S., what makes you think they're going to suddenly turn into the Young Fascist Party of America? Obviously you have no children.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:Boy scouts scare me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, troll, the first advancement requires that you understand the oath. Remove your cranium from your rectum.

    8. Re:Boy scouts scare me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fascism was created by Mussolini and the Boy Scouts predated it by a very long time.

      That being said, your point is not completely off. *Any* group *could* become malicious under the right (or rather, wrong) circumstances. That's just the way humanity is. Fascism itself was a gross corruption of qualities and ideas that, in moderation, are perfectly fine: patriotism, love of history, respect for authority. Many of the Jews who were murdered by the Nazis shared these same qualities. They were good soldiers in WWI, they loved to study history, they obeyed the law.

      This happens in our bodies too, you know. AIDS is merely the "good" autoimmune system turning on itself. Then there is Cancer.

      My suggestion is to stop worrying. If our culture drifts so far that Boy Scouts are blindly following authority and throwing people in ovens, it won't be because they stood up and said the scout oath. It will be because parents stopped teaching children right from wrong. Or that children stopped believing in the authority of their parents. :-)

    9. Re:Boy scouts scare me by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1

      Doh! That was me. Posted anonymously by accident.

    10. Re:Boy scouts scare me by corblix · · Score: 1
      do they actually use the phrase "morally straight?"

      Yup. Although the words didn't have quite the specific connotations when they were written as they typically do today. Probably the writer was thinking of the "straight and narrow" allusion to Jesus's "strait is the gate and narrow is the way" saying (although there, "strait" actually means "narrow", not "straight").

      In any case, "morally straight", then and now, would include refraining from homosexual behavior.

    11. Re:Boy scouts scare me by Lou_Crazy · · Score: 1

      "(this was a core element in italic/german fascism for the knowledge-impaired)"

      A small footnote for the history-impaired.

      The italian and german regimes were very quick to disband scouting.

      Why?

      Because, obviously, they couldn't tolerate an organization proposing a world brotherhood instead of their nationalism.

      Because, obviously, they couldn't tolerate an organization teaching boys to be good citizens, instead of being yes-men who bent to the regime.

      Later on, communist countries did the same; only in the 90s scouting was able to spring to life again in countries beyond the iron curtain.
      Even today, in the People's Republic of China, scouting is banned (even though they allowed the Hong Kong scout organization to continue operating).

      So, if you are scared by Scouts, maybe you have a good reason.
      Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Mao Zedong were scared of Scouts, too :-)

    12. Re:Boy scouts scare me by cranos · · Score: 1

      In any case, "morally straight", then and now, would include refraining from homosexual behavior.

      Then yes, now depends on who you are talking to.

    13. Re:Boy scouts scare me by dangitman · · Score: 1
      You're right, that's pretty scary. "Do my best"? I mean that's obviously training them to be corporate pawns. "Kind and Cheerful"? What sort of Commie trick is that?

      That's all just rhetoric. Look up Mein Kampf or the creeds of the Hitler Youth sometime - they contain similar inspirational language. In actual fact, a significant number of the adults who run Boy Scouts are pedophiles, or at least drunk losers who couldn't succeed in the real world, and want to be "big fish" among a bunch of little kids. When you look at the actual reality of Boy Scouts, it's rather twisted and perverted.

      And why the heck is it restricted just to males? What's up with that? It's very strange that such a homophobic organization is so attached to excluding women and getting as many young boys in the same place as possible.

      The really ironic thing, is that the rapists within the Boy Scouts, almost always accuse their victims of being "gay," even as they they perform the deed. The accusations of gayness are used to shame the victim into not telling anyone about what happened.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    14. Re:Boy scouts scare me by MogX · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for what happens in other countries, but here (UK) all adults involved in Scouting have to have rigorous police checks before being allowed to be left alone with the kids.
      We've also had girls in Scout groups for quite a few years too - the only restriction is for the troop to have a female leader/assistant. Most Cub Scout (8-11yrs) leaders are women anyway.
      I know Scouting has had a bad press with the occasional dodgy character, but this is no different than any other youth-based organisation (Boys Brigade, Cadets or schools).

    15. Re:Boy scouts scare me by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha ha ha.

      That's really funny. So any organisation that encourages youths or members to better themselves is automatically some evil brainwashing cult?

      Most of the of unit leaders are volounteers, usually parents of kids in the troop. As well, in most civilized countries scouting is no longer exclusively male. It wasn't 15 years ago when I was still in it.

      Yes, there has been the occasional sicko scout leaders. There have also been sicko police, teachers, soldiers, doctors. Your point?

    16. Re:Boy scouts scare me by corblix · · Score: 1
      Then yes, now depends on who you are talking to.

      I was assuming you were talking to someone articulating the official position of the Boy Scouts (specifically, the Boy Scouts of America).

  87. Baden Powell would spin in his grave by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny
    The Boy Scouts were formed to make boys of upright character to serve the military and the Empire well.

    The new Political Correctness, Explore Your Feminine Side, Gay Is OK, and now IP merit badges would surely make him choke on his undercooked damper-bread.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by periol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because you think "upright character" doesn't include having a feminine side or homosexuality doesn't make you right.

      There are many paths to the truth. Some are more convoluted than others. Thank goodness the Boy Scouts have finally started to acknowledge that life doesn't come in one flavor. I don't like the IP merit badges anymore than the next geek, but at least my head isn't buried in the sand.

    2. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      I don't think that at all, but I'm sure Baden Powell did (well at least publicly - perhaps he privately liked the wiggle of a young boy's bum, I don't know or care). The founding purpose of the Boy Scouts was to bury kids heads in the sand. Make little British Bulldogs not PC correct types. Baden Powell would not tolerate this at all!

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    3. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by Circlotron · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "The Boy Scouts were formed to make boys of upright character to serve the military and the Empire well." Some people see parallels between these and the Hitler Youth. Note also the picture of the young boy on this page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Youth/

    4. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Isn't that that kid the pope now?

    5. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "The new Political Correctness, Explore Your Feminine Side, Gay Is OK,"

      That's not the Boy Scouts I know, at least not as practiced in the United States. They've successfully gone to court to protect their "No Icky Girls" rule, either as members or leaders, and have similarly defended their anti-gay stance as well.

      Seriously, in a day and age when the US military accepts women and practices plausible deniability with homosexuals, the BSA seems to serve their "moralistic" masters well. If the Hong Kong arm of the Boy Scouts is anything like it is in the US , I don't think this new merit badge program could have happened to a nicer group of people.

    6. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

      gay is not ok in the BSA.

      I'm not sure how Baden Powell would have felt about IP, he was a little late for the "triangle trade" but he didn't seem to have/take issue with colonization of the third world. I guess they didn't refer to any place as part of the third world back then, there was just one world and as the sun went around that world it never set on the empire.

      Much of the British global expansion that was going on during BP's time (1857-1941) was driven by strictly regualted technological advances. The brits had steam engines and guns and the Africans, Indians, and Chineese didn't. Lord Robert Stephenson Smyth Baden-Powell of Gilwell, who was merely Lt. General Robert Baden-Powell at the time he founded the boy scouts, spent most of his career in the service of the crown. I don't know for certain, but I wouldn't suspect that he would have been a open source proponet. I think that he probably would have considered the sharing of the inner workings of the British technology with a World Wide audience to be treasonous. But that's purely speculation on my part.

      He probably would have deployed troops in Hong-Kong to prevent bootlegging of British DVDs, again, purely speculation from someone who is not one of the 3Gs

    7. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      That's not the Boy Scouts I know, at least not as practiced in the United States. They've successfully gone to court to protect their "No Icky Girls" rule, either as members or leaders, and have similarly defended their anti-gay stance as well.

      Yea that whole freedom of association is a real pain sometimes right... Dont these silly people know that only means youre free to associate when youre not offending somebody..

      Seriously, in a day and age when the US military accepts women and practices plausible deniability with homosexuals, the BSA seems to serve their "moralistic" masters well.

      Military Government Agency, Boy Scouts Private agency. I guess we should force the NAACP to accept loud vocal KKK members right?

      --
    8. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      At what point, exactly, did I say they should be required to open membership to more people?

  88. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? YES! by turnierwa · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about My troop is north Carolina has one person who stole a gun. One person who sole a car ( both sentenced to be in boy scouts) and lets not talk about arson! One person was written up on Klan watch for vandalizing a school. He latter was charge with theft and filing a false police report after he lied and said that a black man was going to kill him if he did not steal. Don't forget that Jeffrey Dahmer was an eagle scout. Moral My ass

  89. Not Theft is still Not Theft by serutan · · Score: 1

    Here we go again. The entertainment industry and their lawyers have done a great job convincing the public that they "own" copyright and that copyright infringement is "stealing," but neither one is true. You can't steal what nobody owns. There are no copyright "owners," there are only copyright "holders" who have specific rights for a limited time. The term "intellectual property" is just a euphemism. Copyright infringement is more like driving in the carpool lane by yourself than like stealing actual property. The fact that infringement can cause financial loss doesn't make it "theft" any more than vandalism is "theft." Vandalism may devalue property, and conceptually you could think of it as theft if you want to, but it's a distinctly different act, and so is infringement.

    This isn't just nitpicking. There are good reasons to keep a distinction between theft and rights infringement. The concept of property has been around almost as long as humans have walked the Earth. It's part of the way we think. Exclusive rights to intangibles is a much newer concept, much less clear than the idea of owning and consuming objects. When IP laws originated, the difficulty of making copies provided a certain level of natural protection, without draconian restrictions on the general public. As technology makes it more and more trivial to make and distribute copies, it's not at all clear that maintaining traditional IP protection is acceptable, or even economically possible. It's not at all clear that existing copyright laws must be maintained forever at any cost.

    Equating copyright with property and infringement with theft lets the entertainment industry play the part of the little old lady chasing a purse snatcher down the street. It's an advantage they don't deserve. Right now the entertainment industry has copyright law on its side, and they do an enormous amount of moral posturing behind that fact. But if law itself were our only moral compass, then black people would still be sitting in the back of the bus and using separate drinking fountains. People have to stop sucking up the industry's PR and ask big questions, like how much should the fate of a $7 billion/year industry influence the course of a trillion dollar economy?

    1. Re:Not Theft is still Not Theft by deanj · · Score: 1

      You are completly wrong.

      If you want to change the current law, lobby to change it. None of your arguments would hold up in court. If your arguments were true, we wouldn't even be talking about this.

      Nice try though.

    2. Re:Not Theft is still Not Theft by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      I am starting to get the feeling you are mis-reading. This is NOT about changing anything, this is about the blurring of the line bwteen copyright laws and theft laws, which ARE legally different. This does not change the fact that copyright infringement isi llegal, but blindly spouting the "If you want to change the current law, lobby to change it" when that isn't even being argued is lame, pointless, and downright stupid.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    3. Re:Not Theft is still Not Theft by serutan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. This isn't court, it's a discussion forum.
      2. I wasn't defending copyright infringement, I was explaining how it's not "theft," and why I think it's important not to call it theft.
      3. By posting my opinions here, I am lobbying to change the law.

  90. disgusted by spamchang · · Score: 1

    count me as another eagle scout disgusted by the commercialism of hollywood in violating the focus and spirit of the scouts. who the heck would want to earn this badge anyway (unless the requirements were supremely easy to pass)?

    then again, perhaps the scouts earning the badge wouldn't necessarily become mouthpieces of the industry.

  91. Turn in your friends for a badge! by nate85 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if part of the badge will constitute turning in your friends who are using P2P to curtail intellectual property theft? I can totally see it happening.

  92. wow, how cool by siilarsi · · Score: 1

    I finally found a topic on slashdot that was too nerdy even for me :P

  93. Scouts were guilty of copyright infringement by zr-rifle · · Score: 1



    Why scouts? Read the following for an answer. Remember kids, copyright is valued more than genuine and harmless fun with friends around the campfire.

    ASCAP Reaches Agreement With Guides and Scouts

    A major collector of copyright fees in the United States is ASCAP - the American Society of Composers and Publishers http://ascap.com/ and in Canada SOCAN - the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers http://www.socan.ca/. Regional offices are charged with the responsibility of collecting fees and the following article is taken from the Wall Street Journal, July 15, 1997.

    "Martinsville, IN. - The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers reached an agreement with the American Camping Association allowing camps to use copyrighted music, including music sung around the campfire, for a nominal fee. The camping association, which is based here, said the agreement calls for it to pay $1 per camp per year for permission to use all ASCAP-licensed music. The association represents more than 2,200 summer camps, including some Girl Scout and Boy Scout camps. Last summer, several Girl Scout camps deleted ASCAP songs from their programs, including "God Bless America" and "This Land is Your Land", after ASCAP notified the Association that camps must pay a fee to use copyrighted songs. Following a front page article in this newspaper, ASCAP reimbursed 16 Girl Scout councils that did pay the fees and exempted the Girl Scouts from paying license fees in the future. But ASCAP ad not clarified the license policy for other nonprofit camps. ASCAP said yesterday that camps that don't belong to the camping association may be subject to license fees, but they won't have to pay "if there is no direct or indirect economic gain from the performance of music".

    After reading news like this, please consider the following: stop downloading, stop buying, stop listening to artists that are represented by these organizations. Teach your children that there are free alternatives, and they don't need to listen to Brit or Avril or Dursts new shit to be cool.

    --
    Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
    1. Re:Scouts were guilty of copyright infringement by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      "This Land is Your Land"? What is the spacetime curvature near Woody Guthrie's grave due to his rotation?

  94. Glad we're modernizing Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a good thing we're modernizing Asia and India by outsourcing our manufacturing. Rather than pioneering industrial robotics, we're enabling others to do that. See, "Managing" is a much better thing for the US to be involved in.

  95. As an Eagle Scout Slashdotter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...let me be the first to say, "nooooooo!"

  96. You sparked the debate. by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
    How they go about resolving those issues isn't nice, but theft is still theft.

    Yes theft is theft, but copying is copying, not theft and follows a code of law that is different. A difference which MUST be reconized before any education on this topic begins. Yes copyright infringement isn't right MOST (there ARE excptions, of course) of the times, but statements like yours don't help education, comments that confuse two laws as the same (when comparable as different) to make a point.

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  97. As compared to in the US... by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 0

    I spend time at my son's Boy Scout den teaching them about Open Source and Free Software. If the Boy Scouts teach the kids how to help others, I think having an IP badge is totally against what the boy scouts preach. Wanna bet some company from the pacific northwest is somehow involved in this?

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  98. But it's not a binary world by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a slippery slope you're heading down. Public funds are often used to promote things that are ostensibly in the public interest, but may not hold up to individual scrutiny 100 percent of the time. You might not like it that your local public library keeps copies of "Mein Kampf" and "Huckleberry Finn," but I would argue that a library system that doesn't carry those books on principle is not a library system at all. I might not agree that teaching abstinence is the best way to prevent pregnancy and transmission of STDs among teenagers, but I'm willing to have my tax dollars support groups that teach abstinence to teens, regardless of my opinion of their underlying political slant, because the benefits of teaching abstinence probably outweigh the negatives. (In other words, it's worth a try.) Similarly, you might not agree with everything the Boy Scouts teach, but as an institution it's probably done more good for more boys than it has done harm. It seems a little harsh to suggest pulling public funding on the basis of your personal opinions about the organization's ideology. That way of thinking isn't too far from the idea of withholding public arts funding from art that isn't to your personal taste (something else I disagree with). The world just isn't binary like that. Very few things are "all good" or "all bad," so why insist on trying to impose all-or-nothing solutions on them?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:But it's not a binary world by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      "Public Funds" = "My tax dollars".

      While I may or may not object to my library having a copy or copies of any book written (the authors aren't receiving a vast majority of their income from "Public funding/My tax dollars" purchases), I *certainly* object to "My tax dollars" funding the likes of a Mapplethorpe - artists that rely solely on the government/Public funds/My tax dollars to fund their work are incompetent whores at best - If I want to support their work in public places, I'll pay for it directly and donate it.

      All or nothing is exactly what we are legally required to pay at tax time, why should we not object if our money is used to support groups with social agendae we disagree with?

      If I want to support the good work a group is doing, I shall donate to that group - do not legislate my choices for me based on what a slim majority may wish to support.

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    2. Re:But it's not a binary world by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1
      If I want to support the good work a group is doing, I shall donate to that group - do not legislate my choices for me based on what a slim majority may wish to support.

      Just a little test. I want to give $1000.00 of my meager $14,000.00 / year paycheck to help the poor. The government wants to take $1500.00 of my paycheck, give $1425.00 to welfare adminstrators and $75.00 to people who actually need help. Which one is better? What if I don't think those welfare administrators actually deserve as much help as the poor? What if it's a moral issue for me?

    3. Re:But it's not a binary world by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      The government taking that hypothetical $1500 is avoidable - many people fail to pay their taxes every year. Personally, I'm too likely to get caught, and don't relish the idea of languishing in prison, so I pay every year.

      This does not reduce my voice nor objections to what those elected boneheads choose to spend that money on when it is not where I would wish it spent... taxation without representation is becoming more and more real, but I'm not a violent person (yet).

      I do vote (usually against the incumbents), and keep exhorting others who are eligible to do the same.

      That slim majority *is* legislating our choices, and usually the options chosen are not what we would wish. Does that mean I need to break the laws? The situation has not gotten to that point for me.

      If it's a moral issue for you, you must of course act (or speak, or not) as you see fit.

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    4. Re:But it's not a binary world by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1
      The government taking that hypothetical $1500 is avoidable - many people fail to pay their taxes every year. Personally, I'm too likely to get caught, and don't relish the idea of languishing in prison, so I pay every year.

      Well, it's not hypothetical: that's how much of my $14k they took. :-) But yes, many people don't pay taxes. A lot of them just take advantage of one of the many thousands of pages of tax code we have.

      This does not reduce my voice nor objections to what those elected boneheads choose to spend that money on when it is not where I would wish it spent

      It's not even just that. They're spending our money on things for which they have no legal right. The original idea was that the people were sovereign (quite literally, that means we are the King). Because we're busy and don't have a lot of time, we choose people to do some of the work of government for us. But we carefully decided what the limits of their authority would be. That's in the Constitution, Article I, Section 8 ("Enumerated Powers").

      Almost everything Congress does is outside the bounds of what we've given them permission to do. If a King's delegates did that, how long would their heads stay firmly planted on their shoulders? Like you, I'm not violent, and I don't like the idea of an overthrow of government. Even a bad government is better than none at all. But what resemblence does this government bear to the one we signed up for?

      And what choices do we have? I voted for Bush because Kerry was a self-absorbed 60s radical who thinks America is the cause of all evil in the world. But Bush is not really dedicated to cutting the illegal spending. And our Congress isn't either, largely thanks to the massive will of the Buraeucracy and the pressure from government employee unions. I suppose it will end when enough people realize what's going on and decide that it's wrong.

    5. Re:But it's not a binary world by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Similarly, you might not agree with everything the Boy Scouts teach, but as an institution it's probably done more good for more boys than it has done harm.

      Speaking as a former Boy Scout, I disagree. It seriously screws up kids, even when they aren't being raped by Scout leaders or other Scouts. Even if you don't get raped or abused in other ways, it teaches a seriously fucked-up value system.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:But it's not a binary world by dangitman · · Score: 1
      I *certainly* object to "My tax dollars" funding the likes of a Mapplethorpe - artists that rely solely on the government/Public funds/My tax dollars to fund their work are incompetent whores at best

      That's stupid. Just because Mapplethorpe has had exhibitions funded by taxpayers, that doesn't mean he relies on them. His work wasn't commissioned by the taxpayer, but he made them anyway.

      In actual fact, the taxpayer funding is used to bring world-class artists like Mapplethorpe to a city for the benefit of the city, not the artist. I should also ask: why did you single out Mapplethorpe for condemnation? Why not condemn artists who are directly funded by the taxpayers via grants - not one who has just had some exhibitions funded?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:But it's not a binary world by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      Mapplethorpe was the easiest/most recognizable name I could come up with - I also disagree with My Tax Dollars buying Chihuly's works at what he charges for them, though in that case it's more about amount than about content/subject matter.

      World-class? "De gustibus non disputandem" - you like his work, *you* buy it - don't spend My Tax Dollars supporting it or exhibiting it.

      As a matter of fact, I *did* condemn artists funded by grants: "artists that rely *SOLELY* on the government/Public funds/My tax dollars to fund their work are incompetent whores at best" (new emphasis added)

      Next?

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    8. Re:But it's not a binary world by garote · · Score: 1
      Mapplethorpe was the easiest/most recognizable name I could come up with - I also disagree with My Tax Dollars buying Chihuly's works at what he charges for them, though in that case it's more about amount than about content/subject matter.

      World-class? "De gustibus non disputandem" - you like his work, *you* buy it - don't spend My Tax Dollars supporting it or exhibiting it.

      Oh look at me! I have OPINIONS!

      I suggest you take both of these complaints to a town meeting or senator, instead of whoring them around on this forum in order to toot your own horn.

      Next?

    9. Re:But it's not a binary world by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that either of us have not done both?

      Or, heavens forbid, have we (in *your* opinion) wasted some few seconds of your oh-so-valuable /. reading time?

      Or, is it possible that either of our posts might, (O, the HORROR) inspire some thought beyond the initial habitual knee-jerk response to the issue discussed for someone besides your august self, who obviously already has all the answers?

      Thank you for your input.

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  99. Come on this is slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We deserve far more reactionary headlines .. like may i suggest.

    Group with alleged links to paedophiles announces IP rights project for Young boys.

  100. Licking 30,000 stamps will keep you moral. by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Funny

    You try licking 30,000 stamps. 3 calories apiece, that'll keep you up all night and you're gonna have to be quite an exercise bug to get that weight off.

    And with those impressive tongue muscles, you might as well stay morally straight because the women are gonna LOVE you....

    Then again, maybe stamp collecting should be a girl scout badge...

  101. Let the Slashdot assault on the Boy Scouts begin!! by covertlaw · · Score: 1
    The Hong Kong Boy Scouts organization is a completely different group than the Boy Scouts of America. The oath, law, rank, uniform, insignia, and value system are all different. I don't know if they let homos or atheists into their organization, which is a good bet considering they are a part of an atheist country, but there's no reason for this to degenerate into another Slashdot flame-fest of the Boy Scouts of America.

    The merit badge program is simply designed to teach kids about IP and their responsibility to protect their own IP and that of other groups whose IP they use. It's not about telling kids to buy only Microsoft or SCO products and never touch Linux, it's about teaching kids how to apply the moral values they've been taught to the IP of others.

    Again, regardless of what you think of the Boy Scouts of America, this article is not about that organization. If you want to express your feelings on how bigoted you think the BSA is for not wanting to associate their members with gays and atheists, go ahead, that's your right. But this is the wrong time, wrong place, and wrong subject to do it on. I suspect that this article was submitted merely to start a roast of the BSA for no reason. Congratulations, you've succeeded, although I'm not seeing any members leaving in droves yet.

  102. CompuServe and Prodigy by tepples · · Score: 1

    Prodigy? CompuServe? I think they may want to consider yet another update.

    They're both still around. CompuServe is now part of AOL, and Prodigy is now SBC Internet. But yes, I agree that the wording needs updated for the fact that all commercial ISPs go to the same Internet (and not President Bush's other internets).

  103. As a scout master ... by Tristandh · · Score: 1

    I find this truly appaling. Now over here in .be we don't have the badge system, but the idea of a honour in learning IP low is just wrong. I feel compelled to look up those at the HK scouts who approved this and making my point clear.
    Any suggestions about the contents of that e-mail?

  104. Be Prepared by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Actually, Boy Scouts, like choirboys, might benefit more from the protections of an Orwellian "Anti-Sex League".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  105. Plagiarism vs Copyright Infringement by cquark · · Score: 1

    The copyright industry has tried to tie the unrelated issues of plagiarism and copyright together, in order to attribute the distaste we have for the ancient injustice of plagiarism to the modern practice of perpetual copyright.

    We should not succumb to this deception. Plagiarism is a completely different offense that dates back to Roman times if not earlier. The offence of plagiarism is claiming credit for someone else's work. If you purchase the rights to a term paper from its original author or if you copy from a pre-copyright source like Shakespeare or Aristotle, you've still committed plagiarism if you submitted that paper as your own work, even though you haven't committed copyright infringement.

    Copyright is the comparatively recent idea of governments granting temporary monopolies to publishers. If you've copied the latest top 20 hit, you've committed copyright infringement though you haven't committed plagiarism unless you redistributed the song under your name instead of the original artist's name. Copyright is a less serious offense than plagiarism, as we can see in part because it's a temporary offence: after all, if the item you copied was old enough for the monopoly to lapse, you haven't committed copyright infringement.

  106. Just a thought by jackspenn · · Score: 0

    What makes software better?

    Innovation, right?

    So why not let people or companies that innovate decide if they want to protect their intellectual property. Same for poets and authers. Let them decide if they want to protect their works or give it away.

    Why not instead of blacketly attacking the idea of IP, we respect that people are free to protect their ideas just as you are free to protect your PC from theft?

    If some freely give their innovative ideas away while others charge a fee, no harm is doen. After all they created it.

    The only harm comes when someone invents a great idea and for some reason or another keeps it to themselves. What if someone discovered the cure for aids, but did want the credit taken away from them and so they kept it hidden in their mind? That is the only time harm is truly done. What if MS just took GNU code and used it without following the GNU license? Then harm would be done.

    Property must be respected whether it is an idea or a computer. You need to have some security that others cannot take what is yours.

    Just a thought.

    --
    Respect the Constitution
  107. The Boy Scouts? by eieken · · Score: 1

    Is nothing sacred? Will we be seeing televangelists condemning "downloading" as a sin next or what?

    --
    Meet new people, and kill them.
  108. 1984 reference by Matthew+Kirkwood · · Score: 1
    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984.
    Well, on slashdot the 1984 reference which comes to me most often is of the Junior Anti-Sex League.
  109. Another good quote by InfoVore · · Score: 1
    Don't forget:
    There has grown up in the minds of certain groups in this country the notion that because a man or a corporation has made a profit out of the public for a number of years , the government and the courts are charged with the duty of guaranteeing such profit in the future, even in the face of changing circumstances and contrary public interest. This strange doctrine is not supported by statute nor common law. Neither individuals nor corporations have any right to come into court and ask that the clock of history be stopped ,or turned back, for their private benefit. - Robert Heinlein, 'Life-Line'

    - I.V.
    --
    "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
  110. orwell yes, 1984 no by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

    ummm, there is almost no mention of youth in 1984.

    probably more fitting is animal farm, wherein the young (puppies) are sequestered away by the elite (pigs) to be brainwashed into straight-for-the-jugular law enforcement.

    please, read both books. they are enjoyable in different ways...

    1. Re:orwell yes, 1984 no by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      There's one major mention of them in chapter 2.

      Like a lot of people have pointed out, though, the more appropriate comparision is really with the Hitlerjugend.

    2. Re:orwell yes, 1984 no by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

      that's a significant omission in my memory (maybe it's time to get away from the computer and dive into those (and other) books) -- thanks for the link.

    3. Re:orwell yes, 1984 no by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      ummm, there is almost no mention of youth in 1984.

      So the kids being brainwashed into telling on their parents for thoughtcrime, or the Junior Anti-Sex League don't involve youth?

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  111. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this covered by the Stealing merit badge?

  112. Oh "God", Let's Blast The Boy Scouts by cmholm · · Score: 1
    If you say "I don't believe in God", you can no longer be considered a Boy Scout and will get kicked out of your troop.

    Having recently dealt with this in my troop, I can say that you're absolutely right.... but you really need some context. The BSA (A == USA) position is that they want kids to acknowledge that there's some power greater than themselves, than what they can see and feel. It's a requirement, but it's a very fuzzy one, in that. Hell, if you so much as claimed midoclorians en mass were the driving Force of the universe with a straight face, you're good to go. Granted, the Baptist minister of our chartering organization might lift an eyebrow, but he'd have to live with it.

    Frankly, the higher power requirement itself isn't that big of a deal to me. Our kids get some practice for adult life, such as in teamwork, leadership, and deciding how much fight you want to put into defending a belief system. The kid in my troop decided to take a hike... and joined another troop in more or less of a "don't ask, don't tell" situation. Better he get first exposure to that as an Eagle candidate at 15 than as a naive college grad looking to climb a career ladder.

    I'm not too keen on the gay ban in Scouts, but the Scouts are not a cutting edge social organization, and if it looks like we're still a half generation away from full civil rights for gays, it isn't going to help by crucifying the Scouts for reflecting that. You want to beat on someone, beat on the Mormons for making Scouts their official youth program, with the result that about a quarter of all Scouts are Mormon. Ergo, Mormon mores have a lot of pull.

    That said, if the BSA ever hooked up with the MPAA on something as off the wall and candyass as an "IP protection" merit badge, particularly if they made it a requirement for Eagle, I'd piss and moan to the high heavens.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    1. Re:Oh "God", Let's Blast The Boy Scouts by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Our kids get some practice for adult life, such as in teamwork, leadership, and deciding how much fight you want to put into defending a belief system. The kid in my troop decided to take a hike... and joined another troop in more or less of a "don't ask, don't tell" situation. Better he get first exposure to that as an Eagle candidate at 15 than as a naive college grad looking to climb a career ladder.

      So you're saying that kicking a child out of a group that he obviously cares about for his beliefs is the best way (or even a good way) to teach him about intolerance in the world.

      That is horrible. You should be ashamed. Learning to deal with the harsh realities of the world is one thing. Causing the harsh realities of the world and telling a kid to deal with it is another.

    2. Re:Oh "God", Let's Blast The Boy Scouts by cmholm · · Score: 1
      o you're saying that kicking a child out of a group that he obviously cares about for his beliefs is the best way (or even a good way) to teach him about intolerance in the world.

      It is a good way in that he learns a lesson about the consequences of forcing an issue. I talked with the young man (or child, your call) several times and at length about his beliefs; offered my opinion that as far as the Scout/God issue went, he might be a bit young to set his opinions in stone; finally, offered to advise him on playing the system. I spelled out cause and effect if he wasn't willing to temper his position.

      In the end, he didn't offer any coherent defense of his position, nor give a sign that he'd taken in what I had to say. He was 'way too wrapped up in the esoterica he's been learning about Kerr Black Holes. In essence, he was just exhibiting the fact that he hadn't been exposed to religon of any sort in even a limited way. Even in the US, being that uninformed about the culture that surrounds one can have unpleasant consequences. Hell, my folks didn't drag me to church, either, but at least told me enough about (in my case) Christianity to have a clue what everyone else was fussing about.

      That is horrible. You should be ashamed. Learning to deal with the harsh realities of the world is one thing. Causing the harsh realities of the world and telling a kid to deal with it is another.

      If anyone should be ashamed, it's the young man's parents. One had been scoutmaster until pretty recently, the other a board member of our local scout council. Causing the harsh realities? They should have known better, and either properly prepped him, or not enrolled him in the first place. We let him down easy.

      --
      Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  113. Religious badges by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1
    Out of curiosity, just took a quick look at some of the religious badges they offer. These are similar to merit badges, with different versions available for different religions, and I believe created in cooperation with whatever official institutions exist for that religion. In addition to the numerous Christian badges for the various different sects, I see there are also Buddhist, Hindu, Islamic, Jewish and Zoroastrian badges (as listed here, for anyone's edification).

    Just thought I'd share, for the hell of it.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  114. About that .sig by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1
    People who need govt to enforce their religion must not have much faith in it. Or else they wouldn't need govt to do so.

    I'm a Christian and a Conservative Republican and I completely agree with your .sig. It's absolutely correct and very insightful.

  115. Oh, no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, but, think of the children!

  116. how does one get such a badge? by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    in other words, how do you prove you've protected intectual property? prove you've never downloaded an illegal mp3? snitch on someone you know that is downloading software illegaly? don't hang out with people who pirate movies online? or would they take my word when I say that I've protected intellectual property?

  117. pine derbies by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Oh, I remember those. They actually took some skill back in the old days.

    Now, you just need to go to that goddamn arts & crafts hellhole called "Michaels" to buy a pinewood derby car kit. Just press the parts together and you're done.

    bleah

  118. Brainwashing by Kaorimoch · · Score: 1

    Cool, a "brainwashing" badge. Close the minds of our youth rather than opening them.

    At least these may stop those horrible HK anime DVDs.

  119. Orwell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984.

    I was thinking more of the youth in Hitler's 1936.

  120. Rite of passage? by alexo · · Score: 1


    > If you say "I don't believe in God," you can no longer be considered a Boy Scout

    Ummm... Because once you get over the belief in some amorphous, all-powerful father-figure you are no longer a "boy" but a "man"?

    Yea, that must be it.

  121. Re:This is slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What don't you understand? On slashdot all intellectual property is considered evil.

  122. Can I try? by alexo · · Score: 1


    > The BSA (A == USA) position is that they want kids to acknowledge that
    > there's some power greater than themselves, than what they can see and feel.


    Does the Strong Nuclear Force count?

    It is certainly a power greater than myself (it "holds the universe together"), I cannot see nor feel it and I really do believe in its existence.

    1. Re:Can I try? by cmholm · · Score: 1
      :-) Works for me, although I'd imagine that the intent is to believe in a higher sentience embodied with the force.

      On the other hand, the Jains don't hold truck with creator gods and goddesses of any sort, and they've had a BSA religious service award, modified as of late to give less promenence to the swastika.

      --
      Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  123. Dogbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read once where Dogbert tried to enlist the aid of some Boy Scouts to help him acheive world domination.

    "World domination doesn't come with merit badges," they replied. "We only work for merit badges."

  124. Strange... by 28481k · · Score: 2, Informative

    I couldn't find the details about this badge anywhere in the http://www.scout.org.hk/. Apperantly they have not uploaded the details of this new badge or they're not enthusiastic about it.

    From the Standard [1], this badge is NOT a MERIT BADGE. It's a proficiency badge which you cannot put it on the scout shirt. Besides, what you only need to do is to attend a series of seminars/indoctrinations as you see fit, and vola, you got the badge. The local media did try not to twist the story too much. So it's not really a matter of brainwashing after all, and Slashdotters should not really go crazy about this subject. Besides, some1somewhere was right on his post #12424010 http://politics.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=14823 3&cid=12424010, this does not really matter anyway because no one would really care.

    The HK SAR government seems to be quite enthusiastic about this and issued a press release [2].

    References:
    [1] http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/Metro/GE04A k06.html
    [2] http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200504/30/04290 171.htm

    --
    28481k
  125. FSF badge? by Tim5309 · · Score: 1

    How about having the FSF or EFF come back with a open-source badge?

  126. +5 crazy astroturfing by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    "First of all, people are still taking their content without paying for it. This leaves them no incentive to keep on putting out albums."

    Call me crazy, but if an artist doesnt want to create because they arent getting paid, how much of an "artist" can they possibly be?

    "If people continue to disregard intellectual property law, the business models that the creative industries use will change. However, the industries as a whole will have to change as well, and this will likely result in far lower production of creative works. That's exactly what intellectual property law is there to prevent."

    This isnt about saying "oh we want shit for free" - this about saying, I want to pay the content producers - not the destributors( riaa )..

    You see, the way it works now, there are many many middle men sitting inbetween the artists and the consumers. What this new "business model" will be, is the death of the middlemen which IMHO is NEVER a bad idea.

    I guess the question is, in this world of best buys, astroturfing, paid for studies and ads everywhere, what value do any of these "skimmers off the top" add? Do you go to best buy because the guy knows alot about the computer hes selling? Or do you go where the best price is.
    If you could buy that same computer from the warehouse for hundreds less, wouldnt you?

    The internet is making this possible. Welcome to the internet generation.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    1. Re:+5 crazy astroturfing by natrius · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but if an artist doesnt want to create because they arent getting paid, how much of an "artist" can they possibly be?

      Neither I nor the law care very much about the artist himself. We care about the works they create. It doesn't matter if the person lives up to what your ideals of what an artist should be, it only matters that they're putting good stuff out there. If they are, people will buy it, as long as they can't get it for free.

      This isnt about saying "oh we want shit for free" - this about saying, I want to pay the content producers - not the destributors( riaa )..

      You don't get to decide who to pay. The artists chose to sign contracts with the record labels that state that you pay them. That's the way things work. Record labels invest in artists, and they expect a return on their investment. There have been various developments that bode ill for the record labels, such as distribution over the internet and cheap digital audio editing. That doesn't mean you illegally take music. I'm fairly sure you don't send artists envelopes with money in them anyway. If you want to support the artists, you buy the products they sell: CDs, t-shirts, etc. The larger return on investment the record label gets from the artist, the better deal they get for their next album.

      Read my other posts in this thread if you still don't get why the record labels are important. Even when the record labels meet their eventual demise, intellectual property law will still be important to ensure that artists can make money off of their work.

    2. Re:+5 crazy astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's an important point you bring up about investment...sure there is truth to the cynical stance that the companies represented by the RIAA (and their stockholders) are in it for the money, that the content is a means to an end. We have to acknowledge that.

      But that CD-quality sound you hear...that really is an investment. Production is an art and a science, and there is an up-front cost--from the mastering, engineering, mixing and "polished" production standpoint. People take for production and mastering for granted when they pop in their favorite CD (and well they should!), but there really is a lot more to it than warming up the mics and punching "Record." Obviously I'm not even talking about the overall investment a label puts into R&A, promotion, production, distribution, and marketing...just the actual end-result you get on the CD itself. And this itself is a resource a label offers to many cash-challenged artists just wanting to make their music and get it heard.

      Now I am going to kind of contradict myself and say that with the advent of the PC DAW, new and cheaper technology now does allow musicians more autonomy in how they can "own" their own production. But again, that is only one part of the overall investment required to get from the studio to the manufacturing plant to the store to your car stereo.

      I'm no fan of the RIAA's tactics but their member labels still take on risk everytime they sign the next up-and-coming rock star that, more often than not, ends up on the "guilty pleasure" bargain bin.

  127. Where did you get the "its not a crime" line from? by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

    He did NOT say that it was not a crime, just that the crime is copyright inferingement, no theft. Where did you get the "its not a crime" line from?

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  128. 1984 yes, 10am-bedtime no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reference to 1984 is apt.

    Winston Smith's neighbour Parsons is reported to the though police by his son, a member of the "spies" a children's paramilitary organisation somewhat akin to the Scouts.

  129. That's all well and good, but by fadethepolice · · Score: 0

    When the H*ll am I gonna get my cnet news radio back? Declan Mcmullah or whatever belongs in RADIO. I will never forget the day he broadcast Metallica showing up to bust pirates. They haven't gotten a dime from me since then...

  130. "snitch badge" by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Why not call it what it really is.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  131. Design proposal for badge, by qnxdude · · Score: 0

    How about a big Embroidered Rat?

  132. Scout's Honor by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now might be a good time to review what scouting is about according to this site showing the Eagle Scout ceremony. Sounds a lot like some stuff I've read at gnu.org about being thrifty, loyal to family and friends, helpful, well just about all of them.

    Maybe it would be a good time to make a Knoppix CD for scouts? Help them get the computing merit badge and maybe a few others? I loved scouting until I dropped out because of a shitty group and gave up my hopes for an Eagle, but you could do worse than use free software to help more geeks get merit badges and get Eagle Scout free software evangelists. Actually it would seem to be natural to use free software if you are going to limit copying to that which can be done legally.

    A Scout is TRUSTWORTHY: A Scout tells the truth. He keeps his promises. Honesty is a part of his code of conduct. People can always depend on him.

    LOYAL: A Scout is true to his family, friends, Scout leaders, school, nation, and world community.

    HELPFUL: A Scout is concerned about other people. He willingly volunteers to help others without expecting payment or reward.

    FRIENDLY: A Scout is a friend to all. He is a brother to other Scouts. He seeks to understand others. He respects those with ideas and customs that are different from his own.

    COURTEOUS: A Scout is polite to everyone regardless of age or position. He knows that good manners make it easier for people to get along.

    KIND: A Scout understands there is strength in being gentle. He treats others as he wants to be treated. He does not harm or kill anything without reason.

    OBEDIENT: A Scout follows the rules of his family, school and troop. He obeys the laws of his community and country. If he thinks these rules and laws are unfair, he tries to have them changed in an orderly manner rather than disobey them.

    CHEERFUL: A Scout looks for the bright side of life. He cheerfully does tasks that come his way. He tries to make others happy.

    THRIFTY: A Scout works to pay his way and to help others. He saves for the future. He protects and conserves natural resources. He carefully uses time and property.

    BRAVE: A Scout can face danger even if he is afraid. He has the courage to stand for what he thinks is right even if others laugh at or threaten him.

    CLEAN: A Scout keeps his body and mind fit and clean. He goes around with those who believe in living by these same ideals. He helps keep his home and community clean.

    REVERENT: A Scout is reverent toward God. He is faithful in his religious duties. He respects the beliefs of others.

  133. Maybe this link works instead. by Circlotron · · Score: 1
  134. Flamebait? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1
    Flamebait -- Flamebait refers to comments whose sole purpose is to insult and enrage. If someone is not-so-subtly picking a fight (racial insults are a dead giveaway), it's Flamebait.

    Boy scouts [...] a para-military brigade

    Was that flamebait? Let's ask Robert Baden-Powell:
    Somewhere about 1893 I started teaching Scouting to young soldiers in my regiment. When these young fellows joined the Army they had learned reading, writing, and arithmetic in school but as a rule not much else. They were nice lads and made very good parade soldiers, obeyed orders, kept themselves clean and smart and all that, but they had never been taught to be men, how to look after themselves, how to take responsibility, and so on. They had not had my chances of education outside the classroom.
    They had been brought up in the herd at school, they were trained as a herd in the Army; they simply did as they were told and had no ideas or initiative of their own. In action they carried out orders, but if their officer was shot they were as helpless as a flock of sheep. Tell one of them to ride out alone with a message on a dark night and ten to one he would lose his way.
    I wanted to make them feel that they were a match for any enemy, able to find their way by the stars or map, accustomed to notice all tracks and signs and to read their meaning, and able to fend for themselves away from regimental cooks and barracks.
    * "BE PREPARED" (http://www.pinetreeweb.com/bp-listener.htm), Listener Magazine (1937)

    The part on idle hands then?
    Thirdly, because it has filled up idle moments in which goodness knows what amount of mischief Satan might not have been finding for mine idle hands to do
    R. S. S. B.-P.

    Or the part about the RIAA wanting to indoctrinate young people making a good choice picking an organisation that has access to a lot of young people and who are trusted to teach them usefull skills and solid values?

    Which part of my post, exactly, do you people think was meant to insult and enrage?
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Flamebait? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I think your very existence, and the fact that you are able to continue to communicate, is the part that insults and enrages those who would be our masters.

      But, fuck 'em if they can't take a joke. (Hi EdJ!)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:Flamebait? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I think your very existence, and the fact that you are able to continue to communicate, is the part that insults and enrages those who would be our masters.

      Hehehe, I'll take that as a compliment, thanks : )

      But I think they missed the irony of the ++good part. I thought it was pretty obvious, then again, I thought it was also obvious that this post wasn't baiting for flames. Heck, I didn't even GET flamed!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Flamebait? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Good grief, bitching about moderation yet again. What a moron.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  135. Scouting and free software by Lou_Crazy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It can be argued that the ideals of scouting are much more related to the free software / opensource movement than to the current abuses of intellectual property (which isn't bad in itself).

    This is the point raised by Marco Fioretti in his two articles on LinuxJournal:

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7533

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7813

    Maybe these articles would make a good Slashdot story!

  136. No such thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "that is theft of potential income."

    Right, and when the lottery doesn't send that $100 mil my way, I'll sue them for loss of potential income too.

    Maybe their potential income was 0. Can you steal nothing?

  137. I think you're making this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "However, the industries as a whole will have to change as well, and this will likely result in far lower production of creative works."

    That's a silly thing to say.

    If the money is there...and by jingy, with all that piracy going on, the studios are still raking in billions, then the content producers will produce.

    Let me ask you something Mr. "I'm shilling for Sony This Week"... If Copyright were limited to 17 years, and you didn't have the FBI working as your enforcement arm, what would be the net result? What... Metallica would make records but only give them to their friend?

    Nope, you'd have to sell them cheaper. Maybe Lars doesn't get an endowment for all eternity off "Sandman". Maybe he has to just be a millionaire instead of a zillionaire. Maybe the head of sony has to get by with 18 cars instead of 100.

    And maybe...just maybe this will open the floodgates to thousands of competitors who aren't locked out by stupid rules designed to keep your masters in power.

    Maybe artists will pursue alternate distribution methods.

    Probably nobody will employ you.

    All of these are GREAT things. And you're defending the status quo because it benefits you. NOT because it benefits society.

  138. You're wrong. We do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You don't get to decide who to pay."

    Actually we do. We are not just consumers. We are citizens in a representative democracy.

    That means the laws that create copyright a particular way can and will change to meet the will of the majority. They can and will change. That much is inevitable.

    The record companies don't give a crap about the artists (when they say they do, I find it more offensive than kiddy porn), they care about maximizing profits. So lets get rid of that fiction. If the record companies won't respond to market pressure (i.e. "people won't pay us, we'd better lower prices"), then we will decide *IF* we want to pay.

    The record companies have twisted copyright beyond all comprehension. So the consumer has decided who he will pay. Nobody. People know they're being screwed so they're simply ignoring you and your corporate masters.

    You will fall. You will fall hard and its because of your own greed. You screw the consumer, you get rich, and then won't pay the artist. Poor you. Grandma downloaded something from Napster! Better sue her.

    Its time for you and the record companies to fade into the sunset. Good riddence to bad rubbish.

  139. Its the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I mean the FSF uses the very same IP laws to go after people that break the GPL."

    Huh?

    The FSF has reminded some companies about their obligation to share the source code.

    In your world, that's the same as 10,000 lawsuits aimed primarily at shaking down consumers for $5K a pop?

    What magic world do you live in? Sony/CBS land? Where copying a CD for a friend == terrorism/communism/bad breath all rolled into one?

    1. Re:Its the same? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I said the same laws not the same tactics. I am also pretty sure that some of those companies have gotten letters from the FSF's lawyers reminding them of their obligation.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  140. Don't be silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think it's Just"

    And southern whites thought it was "just" to keep another person as a slave because of their color about 150 years ago right here in the good ole' U.S. of A.

    "Who the hell are you, and why should YOU determine what's Just or not in the nation?"

    Separate but equal...law of the land
    Slavery okay...law of the land
    Okay to exclude people based on skin color...law of the land
    Herding Americans into concentration camps because they or their ancestors were from Japan...law of the land
    Discrimination against a person because they happen to enjoy having sex with the same gender...law of the land

    Dude, you're either ignorant of history or you're just plain dumb. Unjust and immoral laws are always on the books. People should and do speak up when they're wrong.

    And who "he" is, is somebody speaking up against an immoral and unjust law. And who "you" are is open to debate. Mr. Crow. Or should I call you "jimmy"?

  141. Please stop your fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's completely unambiguous"

    No, its completely ambiguous.

    If I buy a CD and copy it so my wife can listen to it...is that okay or not?

    If my CD is cracked and can't be read, can I ask a friend to make a copy for me to keep?

    If I buy a CD and it is stolen, can I ask my friend to make a copy to listen to? Is the thief entitled to listen to my CD?

    I bought a CD, but want to listen to it on my whole-house entertainment system which involves ripping it to the HD and playing it through the network in my house. Okay or not?

    You see clarity? I see bullshit.

  142. There is no entitlement in the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Should an author's family benefit, for a good long time, from his work? Some artists invest years of their lives in works that turn out to have serious impact. They do that work instead of other work that might benefit their family in the near term. "

    The answer is not complicated but you won't like it.

    If you go to the smithsonian museum in washington DC, you will see the U.S. Capitol made out of glass rods. It took the artist years of work. And the whole thing can be held in a 4x6 glass case. Its beautiful. And I suspect the guy made nothing at all from it. Everybody looks at it for free. He gets nothing.

    An author quits his job, forces his family to leave their house to write a book. He spends years writing a magnum opus and in his opinion he creates the greatest literary work in the English language. What is he entitled to?

    Lets say his book is a success and he makes 10 million dollars. And then the poor guy dies. Did he create a literary work or a legacy for his family?

    I work at a 9-9 job, I have 3 beautiful kids, I never get to see them because I work so hard. ANd in the ultimate act of irony, I die at age 40. What are my kids entitled to at that point?

    The guy who made $10M. Seems like a good deal to me. Is his family entitled to make more?

    Why is anybody entitles to make anything?

    What if congress changes copyright so its 17 years long. Did congress just steal from the author? If congress makes copyright 500 years long, did they just steal from the public?

    Isn't the public entitled to works in the public domain?

    Your argument seems to fall apart at the slightest logical test. Perhaps your basic premise is wrong?

  143. ...and thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I have lost track of the amount of times that I have mentioned to someone that they were guilty of distributing copyrighted material illegally only to have them look at me like a deer caught in someone's headlights."

    Because they're thinking.... what the @#$@ is this asshat talking about? Must make mental note...don't take computer to this asshat again.

    I'll bet you're a real joy to work with. Do girls go out with you after about the 2nd date? Or are you a big pain in the ass in real life, too?

  144. That *is* scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "swearing oats"

    Seems unhealthy to me.

  145. Linus Torvalds's badges... by Goonie · · Score: 1
    So when is Linus getting his World Domination Badge?

    Only Genghis Khan, Napoleon and David Frost have one (but Frost pinched his...)

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  146. BSA no longer is true to Scouting.. by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

    I was a scout for many years. But all my scouting was done in England, in British troops (5th Stevenage Air Scouts to be specific). A lot more inclusive there. I then returned to the US (to join the military), and went and checked out the local BSA troop. Did not stay long. Religious prejudice abounded. I am not a Christian...or even a follower of an Abrahamic tradition. And was quickly let known that I was not welcome as a result. So I left. I then looked into the BSA with more detail. And based on my findings, I think the BSA needs to stop associating themselves with the World Scouting Association as the BSA left the ideals of the WSA a long time ago.

    1. Re:BSA no longer is true to Scouting.. by goldspider · · Score: 1

      I would agree that the BSA would be far better off if its leadership (all the way down to individual scoutmasters) focused on community service and character development instead of religious ideology. Let the Church handle that, I say.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  147. BSA FUnding by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

    BSA in NOT funded with public funds.
    I don't know where you think you're getting your information but I assure you that you are mistaken, BSA is not supported with government moneies.

  148. Re:Outdated by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

    \Yeah, that's like sooo outdated, nobody downloades files anymore. And Input/ouput devices have gone the way of the big blue dinosaurs\

    all those requirements seem to be relative to computers... where do you live that you couldn't find a merit badge counselor that was qualified to hold those kind of discussions?

  149. sick is the word alright by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

    but it all depends on what your definition of it is...

    Overnight campouts with the boy scouts are often a fifth graders first experience being away from their parents. Only a person without childern and/or of questionable sexual preferences themselves would advocate the involvement of avowed homosexuals in that environment.

    I mean who in their right mind would let their kid spend the night with whacko jacko anyway? The boy scouts would very quickly become a "gays only" organization were they to endorse homosexuality.

    Homosexuality is bad for a culture/society/sivilization. reproduction comes from hetrosexual contact. And in the long run reproduction is a lot more sustainable than recruitment. the new recruits tend to dilute your doctorine.

  150. Computers Merit Badge debate by brontus3927 · · Score: 1
    Maybe our Coucil was a bit more liberal with its implementation of BSA guidelines, but my troop got a tour permit for everything (short of Eagle projects). If they couldn't get a tour permit for it, the troop committee wouldn't approve it and it wouldn't happen.

    I dare say that, even in 1998, when I earned the merit badge, I could do 4b,c,d in under half an hour, especially if there was an offline document to recreate. Maybe I was a little more saavy with computers than most scouts at that age at that time. What certainly doesn't help is that most merit badge counselors accept "prior art." I would routinely fulfill the requirements for a badge, find a counselor, and have him sign off on a blue card (a generic small blue form for merit badge counselors to list the scout's info, the badge, and the requirements to get signed off on. for those still following this thread who were never boy scouts). Or at the class simply say, "yeah, I've done that" and describe it. Since a scout is trustworthy, most conselors I've met will sign off without any proof.

    While there are some counselors who go "above and beyond" and really go into the subject matter to ensure the scouts actually learn something, most conselors for this badge would be happy to hear a recitation of the dictionary definitions for the terms in #6.

    Maybe the scouts you work with are smarter than normal boy scouts. My brother (who is a Star) knows some basics about hardware and relative pricing, but wouldn't be able to fulfill this requirement without at least reading through a circular. Probably better (for more in-depth-ness) would be instead of comparing prices of a prebuilt HP and a prebuilt Sony in a BestBuy circular, having to do the research to find prices for a motherboard, proc, etc.

    I don't know. Maybe I just had a bad experience with this and several other badges. Maybe in this case, I'm too close to the subject to see it objectively. Maybe I'm going out of my way to find faults in a program that officiially excluded me in 2000.

    1. Re:Computers Merit Badge debate by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      ...a program that officiially excluded me in 2000.

      Sounds like you hit max age. Happened to me long ago too and it claims a lot of people. As you have seen, getting Eagle is tough and a lot of work. I work with an Eagle that got in just under the wire, he had to get things signed before he became an alumni. I hope you are not bitter for not receiving the award. You can succeed without it and if you received the award it doesn't guarantee anything. I think you are better for having done it, however. If your lucky they taught you something very few schools teach you - how to learn. I didn't learn how to learn until I had almost graduated from college.

      Sounds like you have a background in computers. When you read the requirements it is essential that you keep in mind that the MB book has to assume that the person reading it has never seen this material before but may be familiar with it. Swimming for example the requirements don't look that terrible, the table of contents are more interesting and I think completing the requirements would lead you to be a competent swimmer. The ability to perhaps save your life someday if you were in the water and even save someone else. I saved my first drowning victum in 1981 from what I learned in that book. I have here Public Speaking. There are 5 requirements and the book is 44 pages (1992 revision, copyright 1969). I have used that book to work with quite a few people with overcoming public speaking problems. There is also a physical fitness and well you probably know about them all. I don't have a copy of the computer MB book but it sure looks consistent with these other requirements.

      As I said, it is an organization almost entirely filled with volunteers and not professionals. I do know that they try to make things consistent across the country and they do the best that they can I hope. Sometimes I'm amazed at how well they do; how many people are willing to give up weekends, evenings and bust their rump for the BSA and the kids. I personally know about a half dozen men that all have been Boy Scout leaders for over 50 years. Different races even. Sometimes they get very frustrated with the new people. They don't want to do things right at first.

      A lot of things in life are on your honor. Most people know if you are a man of integrity or not. If you cheat on the MB, you are really cheating yourself. I sincerely hope it helped you become a better person and you learned a lot from it. Maybe one day you can help make the program better. Don't be shy, our young people desperately need good leaders and direction. Now more than ever the old timers tell me.

    2. Re:Computers Merit Badge debate by brontus3927 · · Score: 1
      ...a program that officiially excluded me in 2000.

      Sounds like you hit max age. Happened to me long ago too and it claims a lot of people. As you have seen, getting Eagle is tough and a lot of work. I work with an Eagle that got in just under the wire, he had to get things signed before he became an alumni.
      I made Eagle. I completed my Service Project Feb 25, 1999 and I turned 18 on Feb 26, 1999. The reason I came so close is because I held off on choosing a project for over a year before my Scout Master basically informed me what my project would be. I basically rebuilt a church bathroom. New floor, walls, ceiling, everything. In the end, it took over 250 man-hours to complete, and I personally logged over 100 of them. The other 150 were split between 10 scouts. With the deadline looming, I worked 20 hours straight only taking short breaks and worked through the night. The pressure of a deadline has always been something that gets my blood flowing. I tend to procrastinate for that reason.

      I'd love to go back as a leader. But I'm gay. I don't go around trying to convert people. I'm not a threat to children or teenagers. But in 2000, the Supreme Court decided that the Boy Scouts of America have a constitutional right to exclude gay men. So my experience, my enthusiasm for learning and willingness to teach is lost to the next generation.

      Beyond the fact that the ruling excludes me, beyond the fact that the ruling excludes period (whereas I favor inclusion), I disagree with the ruling because it excludes one of the very groups of boys that would best be served by scouting. For generations, the boy scouts has been a haven for troubled boys, a place that taught them values and saved them from going down the wrong path. My former scout master is the perfect example. When he was 15, he was arrested for being in a local street gang. The police officer was also a scout master and offered him the choice of joining scouts or going to jail. That changed his life. The only reason he never made Eagle (in only three years!) was because in the 60's swimming wasn't an optional requirement, and he can't swim.

      Gay teenagers have the highest suicide rate in the country. In the same socio-economic group, they are more likely to get in trouble than their peers. Speaking as a former closeted gay teenager, there is a lot of shame, and a lack of self-purpose. Without scouting, I wouldn't be where I am today.

    3. Re:Computers Merit Badge debate by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      So you came very close to max age out of an Eagle. Glad you made it.

      I certainly cannot talk for the BSA and this is barely on topic, the gay issue you brought up. I also don't want you to think I'm a lawyer, I'm not. I do have some thoughts that may be of interest to you however.

      The gay thing is one of those issues that is like trying to handle a porcupine. Lots of ways to get stuck and once your stuck there is no painless way to get out of it. From a child protection standpoint it is a no win situation because it is extreamly easy to accuse someone of wrongdoing right now and they have courses on how to prevent this from happening. I could see a lawyer saying they "should have known" they were putting boys at risk by allowing gays as leaders (complete with pie charts and other very prejudicial material). The way it is right now is dangrous enough. I have seen men that were proven to be innocent - eventually, loose everything. Wife, job, kids, house defending themselves. Then the girl admits it was all made up when everyone realizes what she is claming couldn't have possibly have happened - sorry. As if 'sorry' will make it all better and everything is as it was. A very good family destroyed and she is 'sorry'. Sort of like the Salem Witch trials where people were hanged and one was pressed to death, she was 'sorry' too. I'm always around other adults as if my life depends on it, because it very well may depend on it. I wouldn't think that you would want to be subjected to that, especially if you happen to be with another gay leader or a number of them. But hey, it's your life. I hope you are never accused of misconduct that way, that is like getting a handfull of those porcupine needles and it will follow you for the rest of your life. If I were gay there is no way I would volunteer for the BSA even if they encouraged it because of the misconduct issue. Seems almost like a sure ticket sooner or later to trouble. Just look at the Catholic Church and this same issue and how it has devistated them to nearly bankruptcy. I can understand why the BSA would be concerned about this as I would hope you would.

      I can think of a number of other thorny issues like this. Clearly it isn't compatible with the BSA. This has also caused the BSA to loose many troops and funds so the decision is not taken lightly. The only ones making out in this whole deal are the lawyers, especially the ACLU that see a pot of gold under every lawsuit. It is a big fund raiser for them (and you probably thought they were doing this out of the goodness of their heart, that is what they want you to think. Most people don't know that win, loose or draw they get paid because it is considered a civil rights case just like with the God and Girl lawsuits).

      Regardless, there is nothing I can do about it one way or the other except maybe get blasted for whatever I say either way (you fool, they cannot be 'cured'. You fool you are caving into them). I do wish you good luck. Maybe it is worth pointing out that there are other youth programs out there that you may be welcome in. Your talents may be meant to help people that need you more. Life sometimes pushes you around like that.

  151. Re:You're wrong. We do. by natrius · · Score: 1

    Actually we do. We are not just consumers. We are citizens in a representative democracy. That means the laws that create copyright a particular way can and will change to meet the will of the majority.

    Right. All my posts in this thread have been about why we shouldn't change these laws (other than shortening the duration of copyright, getting rid of the DMCA, etc). The laws currently state that you don't get to choose who to pay for a copy of a creative work, the copyright holder chooses. In the music industry, many artists choose to sell albums through a record label, so that's who you pay, or you don't get a lawful copy.

    The record companies don't give a crap about the artists (when they say they do, I find it more offensive than kiddy porn), they care about maximizing profits.

    Correct. They're venture capitalists. They're supposed to just care about the profit. It's their job.

    If the record companies won't respond to market pressure (i.e. "people won't pay us, we'd better lower prices"), then we will decide *IF* we want to pay.

    You can decide if you want to pay, but if you don't then you don't get a copy. We've decided as a society to give creators the sole right to make copies of their work. If you disagree with that, then you should try to get the laws changed. Admittedly, that would be pretty difficult, especially since lobbyists bribe legislators. My point is that the notion of intellectual property should exist, because it leads to more works being created.

    The record companies have twisted copyright beyond all comprehension. So the consumer has decided who he will pay. Nobody.

    Good. Protesting against unjust laws is the way to get them changed. What you don't seem to understand is that protesting involves sacrifice. That means you live without the works put out by the record companies and support artists who agree with you.

    You will fall.

    I find it odd that many people in this thread are referring to the record companies in the second person. You should probably check out my posting history or Google my email address.

  152. HK's BSA is not connected to U.S.' BSA ... by WCityMike · · Score: 1

    It would be a big mistake to assume that the Hong Kong Boy Scouts Association and the Boy Scouts of America are related. Yes, they fall within the same blanket organization of Scouts, but the two really don't have any concrete influence over each others' policies or programs. I know it makes good copy, but it should be underscored this isn't the BSA.

    As for the commenter who made the comment about the BSA being gay-friendly, hardly. They fought all the way to the Supreme Court to defend what they felt was their right to exclude gays from leadership positions. (Not that i agree in any way, shape or form with that fight -- in fact, I was aghast.)