Slashdot Mirror


The Unemployed Working on OSS Projects

Roger_Explosion writes "In Australia the unemployed have to fulfill a 'mutual obligation' requirement in order to receive welfare payments. What this means is that recipients of welfare payments have to be involved in some sort of activity that improves their chances of finding employment. Until now this has included various types of community service and training and education programs. Recently an organisation called CommunityCode has been established to allow recipients to fulfill this requirement by contributing to OSS projects."

524 comments

  1. Sounds like a great idea by Thornkin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It sure beats community service. I've long maintained that the way to learn to code is by coding. As someone who does hiring into programming positions, I know I would look highly at someone who spent his downtime working on OSS projects.

    1. Re:Sounds like a great idea by d.valued · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm going to take the contrarian view on this one.

      Yes, it'll help the job skills of the unemployed. But, who's going to keep those highways clean? Who's going to bring meals to the elderly?

      (Take it as Funny or Sarcastic. I'm too damned tired to know which hemisphere's in charge.)

      --
      I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
      Real life is underrated.
    2. Re:Sounds like a great idea by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

      The unemployment rate is high enough in Australia that all of these can be satisfied at the same time.

    3. Re:Sounds like a great idea by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      Haha, you sound a bit bitter! Although what you are saying is sort of true. The fact is, there will be a lot of unemployed people who dont even know what OSS is so they are the ones who have to do all the other work-for-the-dole stuff.

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    4. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Iron+Sun · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm too damned tired to know which hemisphere's in charge

      The story's about Australia, so the Southern Hemisphere, obviously.

    5. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the opnly way to keep highways clean and bring meals to the elderly is to use volunteers or people forced to work for the dole? Our society says those things aren't important enough to spend money on?

    6. Re:Sounds like a great idea by mboverload · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, because we all know how well pale, 120 pound geeks clean streets in 100+ degree weather!

    7. Re:Sounds like a great idea by turgid · · Score: 1
      As someone who does hiring into programming positions, I know I would look highly at someone who spent his downtime working on OSS projects.

      Can I have a job please?

    8. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because we all know how well pale, 120 pound geeks clean streets in 100+ degree weather!

      120 pounds isn't awfully heavy you know.. in fact many of those mythical creatures (girls) come close to 54kg...

    9. Re:Sounds like a great idea by stephenbooth · · Score: 2

      Wierd things is on the news this morning they had an item about how the Aussie government is so worried about the low level of skilled/semi-skilled workers they they're offering easy immigration and assisted passage to immigrants from the UK (probably other places as well). Apparently they need plumbers desparately and are very short on hair dressers. In the item they interviewed a guy who owns a car crash repair business in Wollongong, he said that he's so behind due to a shortage of staff that pretty much anyone who walks through the door will be given a job.

      From that I guess that either there aren't that many unemployed, the unemployed are in different parts of the country than the jobs (although then wouldn't the government just offer them the money to move?) or the unemployed don't want to work in or train for the jobs that are available.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    10. Re:Sounds like a great idea by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      The unemployment rate is high enough in Australia that all of these can be satisfied at the same time.

      I'm not sure which Australia you're living in, but my Australia has a 28 year record low unemployment level.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    11. Re:Sounds like a great idea by robbieduncan · · Score: 2, Informative

      But we are short on plumbers in the UK too. It seems to be down to a long term decline in people training in the "trades" due to these skills being looked down on by the growing middle class. They would rather push their children to go to Uni to study for a worthless degree in Media Studies or the like than learn a skill that would actually provide them with a good income (have you seem how much plumbers charge?)

    12. Re:Sounds like a great idea by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      Yeah I have seen how much plumbers charge. A few years ago I had a broken pipe (well, technically the tap connecting two pieces of pipe had cracked) and had to call one out at about 17:30. The bill for coming out and capping off the pipe (probably an hour and a half including travel) was more than I earned that day, actually it was closer to what I made in 2 days (and I'm paid well above average for the UK, but below average for my job). Fortunately I am in a private rented house so the landlord had to foot the bill.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    13. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, and everyone who does one hour of work or more a week no longer qualifies as unemployed. Easy to win when you change the rules...

    14. Re:Sounds like a great idea by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Yes, and everyone who does one hour of work or more a week no longer qualifies as unemployed. Easy to win when you change the rules...

      Well, there's no doubt the figures are fudged, but the reality is that in some areas, Australia is in the middle of a labour shortage.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    15. Re:Sounds like a great idea by mforbes · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you on all points. After the .com crash (and no, I never worked for any of the .coms myself, although I did work for a telecom analysis-tool company that took a hit with them), I spent nearly 18 months with almost no paid work at all. What did I do? I spent a good chunk of my time writing a faily complicated website in PHP & MySQL, for no money at all, just because I wanted to learn the language.

      It ended up working out strongly in my favor, as one bit to put on my resume.

      --

      Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
      Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

    16. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory serious response: Problems in understanding irony and sarcasm are usually related to right hemisphere damage. But fMRI studies show that hemispheric bias in joke comprehension might depend on the type of joke. Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). The functional anatomy of humor: Segregating cognitive and affective components. Nature Neuroscience, Segregating cognitive and affective components. Nature Neuroscience,

    17. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      We're short of telephone sanitisers too ...

      Heaps of unemployed programmers, though. We're fucking drowning in them.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    18. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      The unemployment figures are fraudulent, and have been at least since Keating's time as PM. They are measured in such a way as to totally mislead anyone who's not unemployed as to the real situation.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    19. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Christ, I wish I still weighed 140 lbs (120 is a bit light for my height).

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    20. Re:Sounds like a great idea by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      I think that was his point, they are skinny little sticks with no muscles with which to clean streets. His point seems to be of the variety that there are "two" kinds of OSS geek: skinny and fat. Neither would have a particularly good record in physical labour.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    21. Re:Sounds like a great idea by lcsjk · · Score: 0

      120 pounds! He's been out of work quite a while!

    22. Re:Sounds like a great idea by dtfinch · · Score: 0

      The 280 pound ones don't fair too well either.

    23. Re:Sounds like a great idea by IncarnadineConor · · Score: 2, Funny

      God damnit you guys, shut up! This is my backup plan if I can't get a decent job as a coder and you guys go and blab about it on SLASHDOT of all places.

    24. Re:Sounds like a great idea by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a pretty typical definition. The US isn't much better. I suppose you can always lie and say you didn't work that hour.

    25. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Keating was probably inspired by Thatcher's adoption of the idea -- or vice versa.

    26. Re:Sounds like a great idea by stephenbooth · · Score: 1
      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    27. Re:Sounds like a great idea by operagost · · Score: 1
      Actually, the U.S. is quite different in this regard. You receive an unemployment benefit proportional to your earnings over the last two years (with a cap that varies from state to state). You can earn up to 40% of this weekly benefit without reducing it. Over 40%, your benefit is reduced until you're working enough to "get off the dole," as it were. Naturally, the exact hours of work you'll need to be considered employed will vary, but it's going to be at least 25 hours unless your last few years' weekly earnings were grossly inferior to your current earnings; in which case, why are you complaining?

      25 hours a week is very underemployed, but it's better than one hour for sure.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    28. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which Australia you're living in, but my Australia has a 28 year record low unemployment level.

      You are correct. The current situation here in Australia is one of short supply, especially with respect to skilled workers. Many businesses are taking on anyone they can get regardless of skill levels. The resource sector especially (mining etc ...) has boomed here, and the money on offer has drawn people away from many trades.

      It's been openly stated by many employers (who can't get enough people) that anyone who genuinely wants to work will find a job if they look. The only people who can't find a job at the moment are those who don't want one (and there's plenty of those).

      It's a great time to be living here down in Oz. :-)

    29. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      120 pound geeks

      I assume you meant 120 pounds overweight...

      Anyway, here's how:
      1. turn bright red
      2. peel (while moaning about the sun burn)
      3. work out a decent tan and many pounds off
      4. repeat as needed
      5. ...
      6. realise that there's outside life
      7. get a job
      8. get a girlfriend
      9. bring up the geeky past only at night, as dreams, then call them nightmares
    30. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How ironic.

    31. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's probably heaps of them out of work too.

      Shit. I need to get a (shudder) MBA.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    32. Re:Sounds like a great idea by carlos_benj · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apparently they need plumbers desparately...

      In the US we tried a covert plan to lure young people into the plumbing trade. The whole rap/hip-hop movement was to condition them to wear their pants at half-staff thinking that this would make for an easy transition and causing them to identify with those they dressed like.

      The plan has utterly failed though. Now the plumbers' rates are sky-high so that they might be able to purchase plenty of BLING to wear after hours. We think the key factor in subverting our effort was the introduction of boxers to the youngsters from other factions. If the trend continues, plumbers will be wearing them soon as well.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    33. Re:Sounds like a great idea by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Gee, and I thought I was lucky that I put on a pound this week -- six foot two, and one fourty five and a half!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    34. Re:Sounds like a great idea by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      That is largely why I code OSS and write howto-articles when I'm between jobs because it keeps me sharp and fluffs out my resume.

      It's great that doing this in Australia can get you a benefits check. I wish contributing to society could get you some sort of benefits here in the US.

      Personally, I'd code OSS stuff all the time if I could make at least a living wage from it. I'm surprised that RedHat or some other big OSS company hasn't started an organization to fund such development. Pay experienced OSS developers US$1000/month to crank out code and documentation. Probably a lot of the expert (kernel hackers, etc) developers can do better than that but for a lot of us that work on smaller projects and tools that'd be a good offer. It might not pay as well as our current jobs but we could do what we love and still pay our rent. I think my personal interest in edutainment and tools for making Linux easier to manage/use would probably be worth $1000/month easily.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    35. Re:Sounds like a great idea by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      It sure beats community service.

      Good or bad, that is probably what a lot of people will say. You'll end up with people going into OS not because they love the idea or the software, but to avoid worse alternatives. People without the correct motivation will go in and submit junk just to say they are doing something to get their "service" credit. Even if their code does not make it in, you've wasted the time of the reviewers to look at it and reject it.

      When you change the motivation for entering Open Source, you change the people, the work routine and the quality of what is produced in Open source.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    36. Re:Sounds like a great idea by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      Bah! Whats all this talk about pounds etc? This is a story about Australia, you should be using the system we use! :)

      FWIW I'm 200cm and 95kg.

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    37. Re:Sounds like a great idea by scott_evil · · Score: 1

      Most people with a trade make big bucks nowadays the people who don't are the ones doing the really unskilled work, essentially gruntwork that doesn't require a trades certificate.
      The big earners are the ones smart enough to go into business for themselves usually have a license to print money. I used to know a plumber who was getting close to 6 figures in the 80's and god knows what he earns now.

    38. Re:Sounds like a great idea by lifebouy · · Score: 1
      Yep, that's pretty epidemic. It's like that here in the U.S. as well. For instance, here in my state, I think the claim is 5.5%, but in large cities and small towns alike, nearly half the people you meet are unemployed, and barely scraping through by taking a welfare check and any odd job that comes their way, or underemployed, making far, far less than a person can reasonably live on here.

      Basically they don't want to admit to the world that they are failing, so they fudge the numbers. Here it's done by only counting those people actively looking for jobs, who are not on welfare. Well, that pretty much cuts out 90% of the unemployed. So if you see 5.5% you should probably move the decimal place to the right one: 55%.

      The problem here is with our education system, among other things. Our education system, at all levels (especially college), teaches people how to successfully work for "The Man," instead of teaching people how to successfully work for themselves. As a result, everyone is afraid to try to start up small businesses. Small businesses are the backbone of any healthy economy. When you start seeing less of them, when you see them failing all around you, that's a sure sign of trouble. High unemployment follows closely on it's heels.

      And while I'm at it, stop f*ing shopping at Walmart! You are killing small business, and you are cutting your own throat. It may be a few bucks cheaper at the register, but its long term effects are MUCH more expensive. Don't f*ing shop there anymore! [/soapbox]

      --
      Drop me a line at:
      Key ID: 0x54D1D809
    39. Re:Sounds like a great idea by scott_evil · · Score: 1

      You forgot the portion of us that's fit and plays sport...
      Although to be honest, the most coding I do is simple scripts, so maybe I'm not an "OSS geek".

    40. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      Personally, I'd code OSS stuff all the time if I could make at least a living wage from it. I'm surprised that RedHat or some other big OSS company hasn't started an organization to fund such development. Pay experienced OSS developers US$1000/month to crank out code and documentation. Probably a lot of the expert (kernel hackers, etc) developers can do better than that but for a lot of us that work on smaller projects and tools that'd be a good offer. It might not pay as well as our current jobs but we could do what we love and still pay our rent. I think my personal interest in edutainment and tools for making Linux easier to manage/use would probably be worth $1000/month easily.

      I don't know where you live, but $1,000 per month is not a living wage anywhere in the United states. Assuming a 40 hour work week, that is only a little over $1 per hour, and you can make $6 per hour cooking burgers at McDonald's.

    41. Re:Sounds like a great idea by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1
      Yes, it'll help the job skills of the unemployed. But, who's going to keep those highways clean? Who's going to bring meals to the elderly?

      Sounds like you've spent too much time on Slashdot already. ;-)

      You do realize that only an extremely small portion of the unemployed is able to do programming tasks, don't you?

    42. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Knara · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he's just using Linux administration to supplement his crack-selling business.

    43. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Peldor · · Score: 1
      As someone who does hiring into programming positions, I know I would look highly at someone who spent his downtime working on OSS projects.

      'Downtime', what a wonderful euphamism for unemployed. I think you have a great career in consulting.

      "Bob! Good news! We're undergoing a right-sizing exercise here and you've been allocated unlimited downtime from the office!"

    44. Re:Sounds like a great idea by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      It said the intention of the community service was "... recipients of welfare payments have to be involved in some sort of activity that improves their chances of finding employment."

      So this would be more relevant if they're trying to get back to work in something having to do with software development.

    45. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you live, but $1,000 per month is not a living wage anywhere in the United states. Assuming a 40 hour work week, that is only a little over $1 per hour, and you can make $6 per hour cooking burgers at McDonald's.

      40hrs x 4 = 160hrs a month.
      $1000 / 160hrs = $6.25 an hour.

    46. Re:Sounds like a great idea by houdini_cs · · Score: 1

      Learn to do some rudimentary plumbing. You'll save a bundle on simple repairs and be able to better judge repairs that someone else has to do.

      --
      ^]:wq
    47. Re:Sounds like a great idea by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Umm. If you work 1000 hours a month then you have bigger problems. :)

      You can live off $1000 but it wouldn't make you wealthy. I was living off $250/month for a while and yes it did really suck. It's more than minimum wage in most places though. Once you proved yourself as a developer that was profitable for the sponsors then they could bump you up to a higher wage.

      Getting to do what I want for a living is more important to me than getting paid well. I'd consider quitting my current job for it.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    48. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      actually $12,000 a year is almost exactly $6 an hour (easy shorthand is to take your salary and divide by 2000 due to ~50 weeks of 40 hours). most graduate students can testify that it's possible to live on this, but it's not glamorous and you're not going to be building any sort of savings for future retirement or future misfortune.

    49. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      You live in a strange little world, where months have much more than 4 weeks.

      40*4=160, not 1000.

    50. Re:Sounds like a great idea by bnenning · · Score: 1

      So if you see 5.5% you should probably move the decimal place to the right one: 55%.

      Wow. And you guys are supposed to be the "reality based community"?

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    51. Re:Sounds like a great idea by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Yes, it'll help the job skills of the unemployed. But, who's going to keep those highways clean? Who's going to bring meals to the elderly?

      The other 99% of the population that doesn't know how to progam?

      If the requirement is to improve job skills how is doing anything in your list going to help an out of work programmer?

    52. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      My bad, I accidentally calculated based upon a 40-hour work DAY instead of a 40-hour work week. $1,000 per month still sucks though, and that would be about minimum wage.

    53. Re:Sounds like a great idea by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      > But we are short on plumbers in the UK too.
      > It seems to be down to a long term decline in
      > people training in the "trades" due to these
      > skills being looked down on by the growing
      > middle class.

      that's part of the reason, but the main reason (which none of those responsible will ever admit to or acknowledge) is the privatisation of railways, gas & fuel services, water supplies and all the other public utilities which employed and trained huge armies of apprentices.

      the public service utilities trained apprentices for future needs. the privatised utilities don't because they only plan for the short term - anyway, it's up to "the market" to magically supply them with trained tradespeople when they need them.

      no apprentices == no qualified tradespeople.

      yet another reason why privatisation was (and still is) a bad idea.

    54. Re:Sounds like a great idea by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      Thats exactly it! Slack dole bludgers! :)

      The last person that cut my hair was a scottish woman. She said that she was put at the front of the immigration queue because she is a hairdresser.

      I think part of the problem is that people dont want to be an apprentice because you get paid hardly anything for the hours you do before you become qualified....the thing I dont get is that you have to pay to go to uni!? Having said that, I would rather have a uni degree (and I do) but having a trade is going to mean a gauranteed job!

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    55. Re:Sounds like a great idea by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      I see some dots and maybe we can connect them.

      * shortage of trades workers
      * unemployed programmers

      The picture I'm getting is development of general purpose robots. It's not an easy goal but programmers have a pretty soft life pushing a mouse and tapping on a keyboard all day

      I could speak of the propensity for people to enter relaxed programming jobs far from smelly toilets, loud jackhammers, freeway drivers, etc. and then additionally to work with a marked lack of vigor, but I'd rather say that it is only the natural order for endeavors of the mind to finally triumph over mere brute force. Work that we detest will ultimately be done by machines.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    56. Re:Sounds like a great idea by mazarin5 · · Score: 1
      Apparently they need plumbers desparately and are very short on hair dressers.

      Does that mean we are on the "B" ship?

      --
      Fnord.
    57. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in some areas, Australia is in the middle of a labour shortage

      Could have something to do with the unwillingness of employers to train employees properly, and take on enough apprentices. Of course, the government has been pumping money into that for a few years, but the people in charge were asleep at the wheel throughout the 1990s on this one (so both Labor and the Libs are to blame).

    58. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only people who can't find a job at the moment are those who don't want one (and there's plenty of those).

      High tax rates at the lower end are a pretty strong disincentive as well. For a lot of people, they're actually better off not working or working very little.

    59. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a lot more stupid than you might think. (Being an unemployed IT person, I'll tell you what it's been like). This is just so people know what it's really like in the trenches, and isn't a whinge, so please don't read it that way.

      During the last election the 'training' money that the unemployed are supposed to have access to was unavailable. We were told regardless of what we wanted to spend it on, we couldn't. {John Howard needed the money to make his budget look better}.

      In fact, I've been unable to spend any of this 'training' money at any time (even before and after the election). I wanted to use mine to do an exam to get my CCNA, and then to follow it with the four exams for the CCNP. I was not allowed, as exams do not count as 'courses' or 'training'. If I was able to spend it, it would certainly have increased my job prospects. In fact, I was rejected for several jobs on the basis of not having a CCNA or CCNP.

      I have, however, been offered a 'forklift' course, which will result in me receiving a Forklift Ticket. I'm not sure how this will help my prospects for work in the IT field.

      For two years, I've been getting told I need to work in factories as unskilled labour. In fact, in the last month, I've been recieving threats that if I don't take a factory job, they'll cancel my unemployment benefits and make me wait six weeks before I am elegible to recieve them again. I have placed an official complaint concerning this with Centrelink. (Aussie Governemnt Department in charge of Unemployment benefits).

      I did take a factory job for a short while. Unfortunately, it sliced my hands up pretty good, and I've needed to see Doctor's about it. I was then phoned by the job agency and threatened again . They told me I was not allowed to leave the job (even though it was a casual job, and through Labour Hire company). Meanwhile, the Labour Hire company who placed me in the factory has told me they have no work for me (so I couldn't even return to the factory if I wanted to).

      The question I ask, is why is it these job agencies can NEVER find me IT work. I spend my time applying for IT jobs off the internet etc, while the job agency the Government has lumped me with keeps trying to force me into factory work.

      Did I spend all those years at University in order to get stuck in a factory as an "Unskilled" worker for the rest of my life?

      In the meantime, I've been looking for IT work for the last two years. I apply for approximately thrity or more jobs each week, and have about two interviews each week. This is far in excess of the four jobs per fortnight that Centrelink require.

      It's not that the jobs aren't out there. For some reason I am getting to the final interview, where it is usually between me and either one or more other people, and I just don't quite get the job. (Though a CCNA would certainly be useful here - and the latest excuse is my lack of IT experience in the last two years).

      I did once get offered a job in Japan, and once a Job in China, which I was willing to relocate for. Being perpetually broke though (having a large loan which eats my benefits away), I needed someone to supply the $140 for a passport. I was turned down on both occassions as it was "not in the interest of the country" [Australia] for my training money etc to be used on it. (I couldn't even borrow the money in order to get the passport!)

      As for these jobs like "plumbers" and stuff that the Government is complaining they can't find workers for. I can't even get into those as I am over qualified. The training money set aside for the unemployed won't even get you into the TAFE (Technical college) courses either (unless you have a large amount due to being unemployed for numerous years).

      Beleive me, I've tried for almost anything I can get, and keep getting rejected. I'm also not alone in this, because I am required to meet once a week with other unemployed people at the Job Agency, where t

    60. Re:Sounds like a great idea by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      I do know some basic plumbing. Thing is, as I said before, this is a rented house. I would be in breach of my tennancy if I carried out any repairs and the landlord pays for any repairs.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    61. Re:Sounds like a great idea by hicksw · · Score: 1

      Have you seen what plumbers have to crawl through? Hint: when the sewer pipe bursts.

    62. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Crikey! I'm about 5'10" tall, and at 10 stone (140 lb) I was pretty scrawny. A lot of beer and 35 years later, I'm fat.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    63. Re:Sounds like a great idea by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I'm an (aging) Australian. Mostly I'm comfortable with the metric system, but for height and weight, its Imperial all the way.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  2. Bloody OSS Bludgers by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bludgers is such a great word

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Pyr05x · · Score: 5, Informative
      Don't mod this flamebait, because its not.

      "Bloody dole bludgers" is an Aussie slang phrase describing people on welfare ('the dole' here down under... not sure why we call it that) with no intention of trying to find a job.

      And I agree... Bludgers is one of the coolest words ever :)

    2. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by wookyhoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      dole
      n.
      1. Charitable dispensation of goods, especially money, food, or clothing.
      2. A share of money, food, or clothing that has been charitably given.
      P Pronunciation Key (dl) 3. Chiefly British. The distribution by the government of relief payments to the unemployed; welfare.

    3. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by !the!bad!fish! · · Score: 5, Informative
      ... not sure why we call it that
      Because that is what the word means.
      --
      Kids today are tyrants. They contradict their parent, gobble their food, and tyrannize their teachers. - Socrates 400 BC
    4. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine how the grandparent could be considered a "flamebait" post. Whoever modded it flamebait should have their scrotum ripped off. And if they don't have a scrotum, one should be forcibly attached.

    5. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bludgers? Quidditch matches and Harry Potter have nothing to do with Aussies or OSS! Somebody mod -1(off topic) these people!

    6. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by marcelmouse · · Score: 1

      My fellow USians might be more familiar with it as a verb, as in: "He doled out the last of the rations." Parent post is right, but USian usage of dole is more like "distribute sparingly" and less "distribute charitably," the second of which is what the dictionary seems to say on both sides of the pond.

      And, um, uncle poster that control+c, control+v'ed the dictionary definition left off the best bit:

      4. Archaic. One's fate.

      uh, gotta work on my resume.

    7. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Atrax · · Score: 1

      'the dole' here down under... not sure why we call it that

      dole1 n.

      1. Charitable dispensation of goods, especially money, food, or clothing.
      2. A share of money, food, or clothing that has been charitably given.
      3. Chiefly British. The distribution by the government of relief payments to the unemployed; welfare.
      4. Archaic. One's fate.

      tr.v. doled, doling, doles

      1. To dispense as charity.
      2. To give out in small portions; distribute sparingly. See Synonyms at distribute.

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    8. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Trent05 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dear Sir or Madam,

      I realize the English might not be your first language and I'm kind of embarrassed that I have to point this out but USian is not a real word. Although at first it may sound correct, the preferred term of referring to a United States citizen is generally American. Please don't think of me as a grammar Nazi, I'm only pointing this out because /. is admittedly US centric.

      While calling someone from Brazil, Panama, or Paraguay "American" would indeed be technically correct, citizens of those and other nations on the North & South American continents (in my personal experience) don't readily refer to themselves as "Americans", and you'd probably get strange looks naming them such.

      I ask of you not to mistake the average United States citizen calling them self "American" (in the context of being from the US) as arrogance. It is a term that has been used by generations of people from all around the world. I often catch the BBC World News (A British Telecast) on a local channel here in the US. They regularly identify people from my country as "Americans". Another good example is the English language telecast of a Chinese news report that is occasionally on our C-SPAN (a US government public affairs cable channel) network. I guarantee you'll hear the term "American" being used here when titling US citizens. Please accept my apologies for the lack of a hyper-link, I've only caught the broadcast several times and I am unsure what the correct webpage to forward you to would be.

      I hope this helps explain things. Using the correct term "American" should make your future posts on Slashdot more clear and meaningful to the other readers. This will ensure the information you are sharing....

      ...Oh, you're just being a dick.

      --


      --
      The Marines: The few, the proud, the not very bright. - Slashdot tagline 04/21/05
    9. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Aussie · · Score: 1

      I have to point this out but USian is not a real word.

      Well, most of us down here just call them "Bloody Americans".
      Would that help :)

    10. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Skrybe · · Score: 1

      Bludgers is also often used to refer to anyone who is "being lazy" not just dole bludgers. So you could be bludging at school or bludging in a sporting team or whatever :)

      On topic again... How cool would that be though. "Yeah I've been coding an OSS project... eMule. Now can I have my payment?"

    11. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Scav's" is better.

    12. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Helish · · Score: 0

      Correction, we call them "Bloody Yanks!"

    13. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Trent05 · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's much better. :D

      --


      --
      The Marines: The few, the proud, the not very bright. - Slashdot tagline 04/21/05
    14. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by bcmm · · Score: 1

      I don't know about North Americans, but here in the UK we use the word dole too. During the Thatcher years of high unemployment, the "dole queue" was a phrase often used to describe both the long queues that formed in places where people could collect their benefit, and by extension the entire unemployed population, waiting for jobs to be available. I assume it is a colloquial word.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    15. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Xoro · · Score: 1

      I'm perfectly happy with being called "bloody Yank". Like "jap" or "kraut", it's a perfectly reasonable expression of nationalist dick-swinging.

      It's the faux moralism implied by "USian" that grates.

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    16. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      In .au they are monikered "septic tanks", or just plain "septics"

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    17. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, well thanks to the US-Oz FTA and the imposision of certain elements of US Law on to Oz...that answer could result in legal troubles.

      Then again Centerlink can be such a pain in the arse that their troubles can lead to such a situation, with the debt collector.....

    18. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Aussie · · Score: 1

      Helish, just for my curiosity, where abouts in oz are you ? Western Sydney here. I haven't really heard the phrase "Bloody Yanks" much in the last few years. Hearing "Fucking Seppos" in the local pub isn't unusual, I must admit.

    19. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, in most of the Western Hemisphere, Americano refers to someone from any of the countries in the Americas, and someone from the USA is normally referred to as estadounidense (from Estados Unidos). To them, residents of the US calling themselves "Americans" does sound arrogant.

      So "USian" isn't intended as disparaging at all, and shouldn't be taken that way.

      (BTW, "bludge" is used here in Oz to mean "borrow", "bum", e.g. "Bludge a taylor, mate?" = "Bum me a smoke, buddy?")

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    20. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To them, residents of the US calling themselves "Americans" does sound arrogant.

      Then it is a misconception on their part. Like GP said, it is an accepted terminology used globally.

      So "USian" isn't intended as disparaging at all, and shouldn't be taken that way.

      "USian" is still not a word. If it is not meant to be taken diparagingly, there is a hell of a coincidence between the non-word being used and the usual accompanying flamebait context.

    21. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Bludgers is also often used to refer to anyone who is "being lazy" not just dole bludgers.

      Great! Now we add "impatience" and "hubris" ...

    22. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize the English might not be your first language and I'm kind of embarrassed that I have to point this out but USian is not a real word.

      It is now! Expect to see it in the next copies of Oxford and Webster's Dictionaries, along with such other great terms like "ain't", "doh", and "supercalafragilisticexpialadotious".

      Amazing how living languages keep changing, isn't it? :-)

    23. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a living language to change, a large portion of the population should be using the term in question. USian is normally bandied about by people online whose sole purpose in doing so is to broadcast the fact that they dislike Americans and must find any way possible to do things counter to how most Americans like it. Therefore, giving Americans the USian monniker that the user knows they will likely not like since they've been called Americans for a few hundred years.

    24. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      "Dole bludgers" dates back to Malcolm Fraser's government (you know, when Howard was Treasurer). I think the current term is "shirkers".

      In fact a bludger used to be a bloke who lived off the immoral earnings of a prostitute.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    25. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I can assure you that the dole here in Australia is not particularly fucking charitable - the bastards who hand it out have all the warmth of a week-old corpse, and slightly less charm.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    26. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Nah - "seppos".

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    27. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Tim+C · · Score: 0

      Then it is a misconception on their part. Like GP said, it is an accepted terminology used globally.

      Things change; once upon a time, "nigger" was an accepted word used globally. Now I'm not saying that this use of the word "American" is in any way similar to use of the word "nigger", just pointing out that words can and do change. It's been a long, long time since the word "Limey" was in common usage, for instance.

      If it is not meant to be taken diparagingly, there is a hell of a coincidence between the non-word being used and the usual accompanying flamebait context.

      No, it is *not* meant to be taken disparagingly. As others have said, given that the continent of "The Americas" encompasses many nations other than the US, it is felt in some circles that "American" is far too general a term for citizens of The United States of America, hence "USian" was born. Some of us also use "EUian" for European, "UKian" for us Brits, etc.

    28. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by swv3752 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am an American. You don't like that, then you can use "U.S. Citizen" or some variant.

      You are on an American board primarily frequented by Americans. You use that other term or even dignify the use, you get a big ol FU.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    29. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by operagost · · Score: 1
      ('the dole' here down under... not sure why we call it that)
      I'm certain it has something to do with fruit. Mmm... pineapple.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    30. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      > it is an accepted terminology used globally.

      Used in countries where English is the primary language.

      > "USian" is still not a word.

      Like I already pointed out, it's basically a loan-translation from estadounidense which has been used in Latin America for at least a hundred years to indicate someone or something originating from the USA, as opposed to someone from anywhere in the Americas.

      > If it is not meant to be taken diparagingly,
      > there is a hell of a coincidence between the
      > non-word being used and the usual accompanying
      > flamebait context.

      It can be a not-necessarily-unfriendly jab at the Anglo-centric mindset, yes.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    31. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Then it is a misconception on their part. Like GP said, it is an accepted terminology used globally."

      Like Zontar said, "american" is NOT a globally accepted terminology, and it IS felt as selfish (which certainly is) and arrogant (which probably isn't).

      The question comes when you try to find a better word: in Spanish is quite easy: "estadounidenses"; in English there's not such a good word (it would be something like unitedstatians which sounds awful).

    32. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by operagost · · Score: 1

      Fine -- but last time I checked both Canadians and French called us "Américain," and you can't argue with the French (unless you have a tank or two).

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    33. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by operagost · · Score: 1

      Well, I think "UKian" is stupid. I use "Brit", unless of course the subject is clearly Irish or Scottish in which case I will use the appropriate term to avoid an ugly situation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    34. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're definitely an American. ;-)

    35. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      How helpful. Now, can you find out an etymology of the word?

      I wonder if it came from Dole Banana/Pineapple Plantations during the Depression ...

    36. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Fine, as long as you stop calling someone from the United States of Mexico a "Mexican". You can use either USian, with a pro-English bias, or EUian (for Estados Unidos). Either one is likely to get confused with your other terms, but hey, that's life.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    37. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      You use that other term or even dignify the use, you get a big ol FU

      Can someone explain to me why some Americans/USians/whatever are getting so steamed up about this? I've seen the word used from time to time, and as used it seemed perfectly legitimate. But here on /. there seems to be some boiling resentment about it and veiled references to the reason being mental associations with some kind of derogatory... something?

      What is alledgedly derogatory about it? What is the bad thing that it's being associated with? Is it most noticed by these objectors when used by people that the objectors disagree with? Why do some people think it's objectionable?

    38. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      besides which, since when were the United States of America considered the arbiters of what constitutes good English?

      bloody cheek, you lot aren't even in the Commonwealth..

      Then again, there's a lot of english people who speak dreadful English.. West Africans and Indians often speak the clearest English, in my opinion.

    39. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Darby · · Score: 1

      In fact a bludger used to be a bloke who lived off the immoral earnings of a prostitute.

      "Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?"

    40. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      I made the faux-pas of using USian on Slashdot.

      Naturally, it was met with Nationalist chest-beating and outrage, and the assumption that I 'disliked Americans'.

      Personally, I just thought it was a playful shorthand for Citizen of the United States of America. Like UK'er, Brit, Limey, or whatever.

      I didn't realise you were quite so sensitive. Bless yer cotton pickin' socks. :-)

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    41. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I've no idea. I first saw the term used on kuro5hin, and a few people objected there too. I never got much more out of them than that it's derogatory - never *why* it is, just a blank assertion that it is.

    42. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      In eastern Canada it is called "Pogey". I have no idea why. Poe-gi... Usage would be "so you goin' on pogie bye?" No I don't know its spelling either apparently ...

    43. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by robogymnast · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "bling bling"! My English teacher nearly had a heartattack when I showed him this :)

      --
      unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; find ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; fsck ; umount ; sleep
    44. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Dole was in common use in the USA up through the Depression. I think it fell out of favour entirely during Johnson's Great Society a generation later.

      Probably because someone decided it was demeaning, and would scar their psyches.

      Note that during the Depression, it was considered a great embarrassment by most Americans to be on the dole.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    45. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Legitimate to make up a name and use instead of the already accepted names to to force some pc bs on the rest of us? Do you like me to start calling you Axelin? And my reasoning is that it is not right for you to use harlequin because it is arrogant for you to use the name at the expensence of all the other jesters in the world.

      I am well aware of 1984 and newspeak, and I will resist any attempt to marginalize Americans, or if you prefer, United States of America Citizens.

      It is not the term itself that is so objectionable but the recognition of the ideas behind the creation of the term. Enemies, to the United States and for which it stands ( and I don't mean what Bush and all are trying to turn this country into), are behind this term. It is an insidious attack against us. Take away our cultural name and you weaken us if we allow it.

      Many others are not maybe as consiously aware of the problem but still recognize it instinctively. Maybe some one else can better articulate my thoughts, but that is it in a nutshell.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    46. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      There is a reason why there is so much anti USA feeling around the globe... Can YOU guess why? Let me enlighten you. It has to do with a perceived arrogance. Sometimes it is perceived, sometiomes, in this particular case, it may even be real. Either way, with US debt rising rapidly, I'd reccomend learning manners in a hurry before you are invaded by the debt collectors.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    47. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      Maybe some one else can better articulate my thoughts, but that is it in a nutshell.

      I can better clarify your thoughts in a single sentence:

      You're an arrogant and egocentric clod.

      It's not an attempt to marginalize "Americans", it's attempt to inject a little humility into an extremely hubristic society. Yeah, we may still be the world's only superpower and yeah we may still be the world's most consumptive society, but the world's getting smaller and the U.S. isn't the center of the universe. Get used to it. I'm convince that the biggest reason that no other term has managed to overtake American to describe a U.S. citizen is because the alternatives either (a) sound stupid (USian? come on...) or (b) are unwieldy (United States of America Citizen, or even U.S. Citizen).

      It's much like the lack of a proper gender neutral pronoun in English has lead to oh so many problems (rampant use of he/she, or substituting she for he in a way to counter the overwhelming use of he (for example, most law school textbooks use she for third person pronouns. At first it's a rather noticeable phenomenon but one quickly becomes accustomed to it)). And yes, I know that "it" is technically gender neutral, but nobody like's to be referred to as "it".

      --
      fuck you.
    48. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Then why are you on an American board?

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    49. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And I -- a native US citizen who actually speaks a language or two other than English and has spent some time abroad -- made the faux-pas of explaining a possible derivation of the term... resulting in Somebody coming back a whole day later and modding me Off-Topic. Methinks some thin-skinnedness was in operation here.

      Too bad they ran out of mod points before they were able to do likewise to all those who seemed inclined to agree with me...

      Maybe I should change my sig to read, "USian who doesn't necessarily object to the term 'USian'." ;)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    50. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by Helish · · Score: 1

      I know about the seppos, at the moment I live right in the Sydney's CBD, but soon I'll be moving out, either west, north or south. I've no idea. By the way, it looks like Yanks is overrated, I'm glad I wasn't the one to bring up seppos first.

    51. Re:Bloody OSS Bludgers by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Look, I don't support Bush or many of America's policies. I do support the country though and will not let foreign enemies and internal traitors sap our national identity.

      Perhaps you are ashamed to be an American, but I am not ashamed. So go on and leave America for you are despised.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  3. This is heaps good by log2.0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I were to be unemployed, this is exactly what I would do! Imagine having all this spare time (since you have no job) to work on any OSS project you want.

    Having said that, the dole (what we call welfare here) is pretty low. I think its about 100USD a week? (for all those US people ou there)

    --
    Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    1. Re:This is heaps good by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As opposed to job hunting?

      That's only half-serious. I know folks that don't spend enough time looking for a job, and that's why they're still unemployed. Sometimes they enjoy being unemployed more than the paycheck that a job would bring in.

      On the other hand, the obvious benefit to this kind of work is that you can build your resume and skillset by working in the field, even without having that job.

    2. Re:This is heaps good by inflex · · Score: 1

      I can definately say that a lot of people on the "dole" are getting more per week in than I am (after tax). The way the system is geared here in Australia there's very little incentive to go out there and "have a go" because all that happens is that you end up with less money in your pocket and you have less time in your life to do the things you like.

      Paul.

    3. Re:This is heaps good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're earning less per week than someone on the dole then you are not only working in a very shitty job, you're also a mug.

    4. Re:This is heaps good by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      WHAT? I thought the dole was bugger all? How much do you get if you dont mind me asking? :)

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    5. Re:This is heaps good by inflex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The business pulls in a lot per year --- but I get nothing, I don't even have a wage (yet) :-\

      The trouble is this annoying thing called "expenditure" (oh and tax... damned tax... 47%... it's INSANE!!!). Profits will rise from the ashes in the next few months - until then it's been 5 years of hard work.

      Paul.

    6. Re:This is heaps good by inflex · · Score: 1

      I forgot to point out, the TAX side of things is one reason I'd LOVE to get my hands on a few of these work-for-the-dole people; that way I'd feel at least that I've gotten some of my extort^Wtax payment back.

    7. Re:This is heaps good by strider44 · · Score: 1

      it is only a hundred or couple of hundred USD a week but one thing to realise is the cost of living here is a *lot* lower.

    8. Re:This is heaps good by kubrick · · Score: 1

      One of the problems with work-for-the-dole is that it drives all wages down to have government-mandated sub-minimum-wage workers out there. All those people who claim that OSS puts proprietary programmers out of work would have a fit over it.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    9. Re:This is heaps good by inflex · · Score: 1

      Hey AC,

      It's pretty simple ---- in gross income I exceed the dole-handouts by a few factors... in net income they win. However, soon when all the equipment purchases are paid for, tax bills paid for and everything else finally the hard work will pay off...finally.

    10. Re:This is heaps good by sstrick · · Score: 1

      OK... I am not too sure about this. I run my own company as well.

      If you are running into the 47% top tax bracket then you are earning at least $50K per year personally, company tax is a flat 30% (in Aus).

      Any business related expenses should be paid for by the company and will be 100% tax deductable.

      If you are earning more then $1K per week (pre-tax) or $50K per year then you are much better off then someone on the dole.

      I don't like the idea of dole bludgers either, however it is interesting to look at how much of our social security goes to the unemployed as compared to the amount that goes to pensioners. However superannuation should start to address this in 20+ years.

      To be honest with the record low unemployment rate at the moment and the booming resources market everyone in Australia should be able to find work.

      --

      "Do you think we could wipe out world hunger forever if scientists figured out how to make AOL's Free CD's edible?"-
    11. Re:This is heaps good by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

      The ammount you get is directly related to how many dependant kids you have. More kids = more money. If you have enough kids then you win a free car.

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    12. Re:This is heaps good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble is this annoying thing called "expenditure" (oh and tax... damned tax... 47%... it's INSANE!!!). Profits will rise from the ashes in the next few months - until then it's been 5 years of hard work.

      What's the tax rate in Australia like? It can't possibly be 47% across the board.. can it?

    13. Re:This is heaps good by inflex · · Score: 1

      Hey, this is slashdot - I can say what ever I like without backing it up with truth ;-)

      Just kidding - currently I'm living worse off only because of two things 1) paying out existing large tax debt (accounting stuff up), 2) slide in trading relative to last year, meaning I'm paying a high PAYG rate relative to what I should be (though admittingly I am going to get that back at the end of the financial year... right? right!?)

      Incidently, yes, I now hire an accountant - since while I can balance bits and bytes, my money sense is hopeless).

      Paul.

    14. Re:This is heaps good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
      The unfortunate truth: An unemployed single parent in Australia gets (IIRC):
      • The dole, which I believe goes up the more kids you have.
      • Childcare rebates (> 80%)
      • Rent assistance
      • Concession rates on just about everything.
      • And if the other parent of the child(ren) is still alive and obeying the rules: (assuming full time care by the one parent) 18% of their GROSS income per child AFTER tax is taken out (I think it might be capped somewhere over 50%).
      Meanwhile, the other parent has typically over 25% of their pay (including the tax free threshold) disappear in tax, and then of course paying 18% of their gross income per child to the one with custody...

      On a more unemployment oriented tack, while rental assistance is on offer to anyone going through a period of unemployment, there is absolutely no assistance to help pay off a mortgage, which can easily cost around the same on a weekly basis. The government really does try to support the destitute, while IMHO discriminating against would-be home owners...

      Anyway, in the IT field, the opportunity for this sort of community service has got to be a blessing.

      I'm not going to give any details on handouts to minority groups... other than that, have I missed anything?

    15. Re:This is heaps good by danielrose · · Score: 1

      It can be whatever the fuck the government thinks it should be! They have the senate majority which means we get nailed in the ass!

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    16. Re:This is heaps good by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Every loan I've had (mostly through defence credit unions) has had a little checkbox - something along the lines of 'no consequences in the event of loss of income' - is this not common with housing loans from 'normal' banking institutions? Same deal with a car loan I once had from FordCredit (or something like that)

    17. Re:This is heaps good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Having said that, the dole (what we call welfare here) is pretty low. I think its about 100USD a week? (for all those US people ou there)

      Er, more like USD$70 a week for one rate level...say students

    18. Re:This is heaps good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a sliding rate depending on income. Our income tax system is quite frankly a mess, as most times it seems biased against the >40k to benefit the top end of the scales & those with tax dodges.

      www.ato.gov.au would be the place to go and find out more.

    19. Re:This is heaps good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been unemployed and though I did get welfare there was not one moment when I thought it was a good life. It's not. The money you get to help pay for rent and food is exactly just that. Barely. I've never heard of anyone who would rather get almost nothing, instead of having a job and get so much more. Having a job is not only good for your economy, it's great for your health and wellbeing in general.

    20. Re:This is heaps good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine I would use the Windows CE-equipped shopping cart as my laptop-on-a-stand rig? I probably already have the requisite gloves-with-fingers-exposed as part of my fashion-forward geek gear. ANd ThinkGeek hoodie.

      Don't flame me, I'd run Linux on it!

    21. Re:This is heaps good by nomadicGeek · · Score: 0
      I think its about 100USD a week?

      Sounds like you guys should outsource your unemployment to China. It should be much cheaper. You could probably afford 4 unemployed for what you are now paying for one.

    22. Re:This is heaps good by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Yes but your forgetting that we only get to spend 90% of the dole we get, the rest is taxed.

    23. Re:This is heaps good by L0k11 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can definately say that a lot of people on the "dole" are getting more per week in than I am (after tax). The way the system is geared here in Australia there's very little incentive to go out there and "have a go" because all that happens is that you end up with less money in your pocket and you have less time in your life to do the things you like.

      thats rediculous, last year I unfortunately ended up on the dole (moved cities and didn't find a job as quick as I hoped to)

      My payment, as a 21 year old living with a partner and no other dependants (ie children) was $360 a fortnight. That included rent assistance. I also had to attend job search sessions at 8:30am every morning under threat of having my payment cut. (thus preventing bludging and sleeping in all day) I got job the very week my payments started (thank god) but I still had to attend that dreaded place for a week until I actually started working. According to the ACTU http://www.actu.asn.au/public/about/minimumwage.ht ml The minimum wage payable in Australia is $467.40 per week or $12.30 per hour. thats over twice what you get while taking part in mutual obligation (ie jobsearch activities). It sure encouraged me to start working as soon as I could.

      Interestingly the Howard government is hinting at "reforming" (conservative for "taking away")the minimum wage so who knows maybe dole bludging will start to become more attractive...

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
    24. Re:This is heaps good by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this is just bullshit. I've recently come off the dole, and, at $A436 per fortnight it wasn't even enough to pay my mortgage. I have used up all my savings and acquired a serious overdraft. The reason I was unemployed for long enough for this to happen is that THERE AREN'T ANY FUCKING JOBS. Believe me, I was looking very hard.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    25. Re:This is heaps good by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      > To be honest with the record low unemployment rate at the moment and the booming resources market everyone in Australia should be able to find work.

      You don't get out much, do you? The unemployemnt figures are fraudulent. There aren't any jobs out there. I've only just started working again after 5 months, and I've been looking for work very, very hard.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    26. Re:This is heaps good by inflex · · Score: 1

      I agree, $436/ftnt isn't enough, utterly agree.

      For a long time I was scraping by on $138.00 AUD/wk (varied a little depending on the USD:AUD exchange rate) - I moved in with my IN-LAWS. I've been lucky that I had two credit-cards which I basically maxed out and used to pay each other off. I was lucky that the inlaws offered to help out.

      I went to Centerlink to see what I could do - they looked at my /previous/ years financials and said there was just no way that I could qualify for assistance. Being a self-employed person can really be troubling at times when everyone bases everything on your previous financial year results.

    27. Re:This is heaps good by a1englishman · · Score: 1
      about 100USD a week
      In the US, the amount you get for unemployment depends on a couple of things: Which state you live in, and how much you earned. Different states have a maximum allowance. You receive a percentage of that maximum, depending on how much you paid in while you were working.

      Here, in California, the maximum weekly is US$130, if I recall correctly. Not much better really, and it ain't cheap to live here.

    28. Re:This is heaps good by Keely · · Score: 1
      Every loan I've had (mostly through defence credit unions) has had a little checkbox - something along the lines of 'no consequences in the event of loss of income' - is this not common with housing loans from 'normal' banking institutions? Same deal with a car loan I once had from FordCredit (or something like that)
      That checkbox is generally (if you read the fine print) an offer of insurance which will make your loan payments if you lose your job, or become disabled, or whatever other circumstances they state - the ones I've seen have varied somewhat. You can choose to pay a little more for this insurance, or to take the chance that you won't need it. Presumably the previous poster either wasn't offered this insurance or chose to decline it.
    29. Re:This is heaps good by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      Being un/under employed sucks. It kills your morale, you devote tons of time to unproductive hunts for work. It makes you desperate for any offer. Your depression at the hopelessness of it all makes you aimless and unproductive.

      Being in the cycle to get a decent position takes at least a month. So if you can handle it all, before your unemployed (which can happen at any time, no matter how wonderful you are), network like mad, donate time and effort to projects to get your name out, be kind to people who you may have to call up later.

      Then when the time comes that your job is no more, you strut into offices like a rock star and wait for the cardboard boxes overflowing with filthy cash to drop at your feet.

    30. Re:This is heaps good by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      It usually seems to happen when the unemployed has a working spouse that can pay the bills. It's easy for some people to fall into the "extended summer vacation" mode that feels like high school/college again. That can take a heavy toll on a marriage, social life, etc.

      Then again, I know people (my wife and I included) that can't stand to be away from work so long. Extended unemployment would drive us nuts.

    31. Re:This is heaps good by terrywc · · Score: 1

      People in Australia in receipt of Newstart (latest jargon for dole) are REQUIRED to continually seek work. Their efforts have to be documented each fortnight when they submitt their form.

      The CC project does not relieve them of the work requirement. It is designed to help them meet their mutual obligation (MO) activity, which they have to do as well.

      The problem with MO is that people can end up being forced into totally useless activities that do not/will not ever improve their chances of getting work.

      Note, after 6 months on Newstart, your previous employment counts for nothing and you are required to take any work you can get.

  4. fine code by hool5400 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stoners and dole bludgers, what wonderful code they will create!

    --

    Remember, it takes 42 muscles to frown and only 4 to pull the trigger of a sniper rifle.
    1. Re:fine code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet they'll just write a bunch of slack ware.

    2. Re:fine code by plaxion · · Score: 1

      What? Bob Dole is going to do a cameo as a hippie in the next Harry Potter movie?!

    3. Re:fine code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering what marginally employed stoners in the OSS/FS circles here have created, it's bound to be pretty good. They don't call us "Dirty GNU Hippies" for nothin', ya know!

    4. Re:fine code by mboverload · · Score: 0
      Biggest. Nerd. Joke. Ever.

      Mod parent UP!

    5. Re:fine code by hugzz · · Score: 3, Insightful
      From what I can gather, there are far too many skilled programmers around with no jobs because they lack a little peice of paper which costs them many thousands of dollars saying that they've been to uni

      This comunity code thing could let them use their real skills (rather than having to do mowing for their dole), and also will probably add something nice to their resume to maybe get them moving in the job market.

    6. Re:fine code by Goat(---o---)See · · Score: 1, Funny

      We mostly sit around and talk about cool software, but never write it. I've though about using two mouse cursors myself, probably using a MIDI keyboard as input for the second cursor's keyboard focus. I'm gonna do another bong hit and download the X.org source, man. How many muscles to remove a 1541 from a brown eye?

      --
      How'd that Commodore 5 1/4" floppy disk drive get in there? I guess anything can happen after two eight balls.
    7. Re:fine code by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      I agree! I'm in that boat. I live in a small city (~100k pop) where there's not a lot of IT around, and I've applied at virtually all the places that do the kind of work I'm interested in, there's been a few bites but no takers yet. I'm almost completed my degree (Bachelor of IT with Networking major), but talking to others slightly ahead of me theres not much prospect here anyway. Having this would help future positions, when I finally finish and move away.

      Too bad their mailman archives don't work!

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    8. Re:fine code by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Having a degree doesn't actually make a lot of difference, believe me.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    9. Re:fine code by paulpach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A person who does not have a degree can be very good on one area, but usually lacks on others. There are things that you normally don't learn by just experience that can be very usefull:

      Software Engineering, analisis and design are not done very frequently in small companies, I have seen many untrained people just jump into coding after they get handed the requirements. A person with a degree will have some training in analisis and design.

      Several technical areas such as linear optimization and language theories. This things you simply don't learn on the working field, yet for many project are required.

      Cryptograpy, It often requires deep knowledge of math. Way above what a high schooler can do.

      Calculus and Algebra, For some applications, you really need to dig deeper than high school.

      Algorithms performance orders. It is difficult to learn how to calculate the performance of an algorithm without formal training.

      For what I have seen, programmers without degrees can be really good programmers, but usually lack a broader and more technical knowledge. After all, the person with the degree has spent years of training in very different subjects, and the person without one has most likelly spent years learning one or two things. In the university you are expected to learn how to program in the first trimester, the rest is the really difficult and valuable part.

      Also, for the person itself, it is clear it makes a big difference: How much do you think is the average salary for someone with a degree vs someone without one? (Haven't actually looked it up, but it is a no brainer)

    10. Re:fine code by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      you are expected to learn how to program in the first trimester

      Gosh, I didn't program until after I was born, and here we have people programming in the first trimester. How, do they hook an acoustic modem to the ultrasound or something? :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    11. Re:fine code by tritonic · · Score: 1

      How much do you think is the average salary for someone with a degree vs someone without one?

      I've heard this one several times. People with degrees earn more than people without. But is it actually the degree that helps you earn more money, or is it just because most of the smart people go to university anyway? As my statistics teacher used to say, corellation does not imply causation.

    12. Re:fine code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This attitude is typical among many Australians. I would attribute this country's declining quality of education to people's notion that formal education isn't worth much. I've never seen so many people put down higher education as much as Australia does. While the world moves forward guided by knowledge, Australia moves backward (downward =P).

    13. Re:fine code by pebs · · Score: 1

      And then there are those who have a degree and still don't have a clue.

      There are the super-nerd types who can learn all of that without going to school for it simply because they are interested.

      I have a degree myself, but I can see the cases where it doesn't matter.

      What a degree really does is give a potential employer concrete evidence that you have been able to function in a structured environment. Someone with only work experience may have a disadvantage because the potential employer has no way of knowing whether they really sucked at their last job (unless they contact the person past employers, but even then you still can't tell). Sample code and open source projects may help, but that's a lot of work for a potential employer to go through and then will more than likely just move on to the next resume.

      --
      #!/
    14. Re:fine code by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point. I have a degree. At the moment, given the glut of programmers etc in the job market, I don't think it's helped me get a job. I _do_ believe it enables me to do the job better, however.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  5. REDS! by Jukashi · · Score: 4, Funny

    What happens when the aussie economy does better with a legion of state sponsored oss programmers? Awesome!

    1. Re:REDS! by MIcroswipe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe the Aussie companies will keep more programmers employed since everyone you lay off will go out and code for your oss competitor.

    2. Re:REDS! by syousef · · Score: 1

      Do you know any economics? If you increase the supply, prices go DOWN. More people coding OSS means more competition and everyone paid peanuts for what is a stressful job. (Most coding isn't as stressful as being a pilot or a doctor, but in general it's more stressful than being a bricky or a plummer though much less physical).

      Let me guess. This gets modded -1 troll.

      *sigh*

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:REDS! by shimmin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Coding isn't inherently stressful, but working under fear of unemployment is. Now, if you're already unemployed ...

    4. Re:REDS! by Marthisdil · · Score: 0

      Maybe the Aussie companies will keep more programmers employed since everyone you lay off will go out and code for your oss competitor.

      But what if your company makes OSS software, and being OSS, they don't generate the money anyways to afford to keep you, thus you lose your job. Since you're now unemployed and getting state money, technically, you could continue to work on the previous employers projects, since they're OSS, and not get into trouble. Yeah. I can see some companies that are using OSS programmers doing this. GG.

      I think the state should go ahead and just force you to do something directly useful to the state...like, clean up litter, help the homeless, instead of letting you do what you wanna do while taking state money.

    5. Re:REDS! by syousef · · Score: 1

      Coding isn't inherently stressful

      You've either:

      a) Never worked on anything complex
      b) Don't care about the result of your work
      c) Care but are so full of yourself you've never come back to a piece of code and in hindsight thought "woah, what was I thinking when I wrote that"
      d) Are made of stone

      I'm feeling generous so I'm guessing (a) and possibly a hint of (c)

      I've personally worked on complex systems but thankfully nothing that would result in someone dieing if I got it wrong, but there's plenty of that kind of code out there, helping make the world go round.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:REDS! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Throughout history, people have worked 18 hour days, 7 days a week in fields and mills. People have worked under threat of death, they've worked in the freezing cold whilst half-starving. They're worked knowing that if they make a single mistake their family would become homeless. They've worked with dangerous chemicals, whilst being shot at, whilst being bombed, they've worked in situations where the average life expectancy is measured in weeks.

      And all you have to do is sit in a comfortable, heated, safe office 40 hours a week, on a nice comfortable chair, typing at a computer, doing something stimulating and intellectually challenging. And you're complaining about STRESS? Fucking grow up. You don't know what the word means.

    7. Re:REDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.

      Piss on progress, why don't you.

    8. Re:REDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point isn't to make you earn your dole. Otherwise, it would be called a government labor program that you right-wingers hate so much.
      The point is to enhance the employability of people on the dole, so they will get off the dole sooner.

  6. I think that it's great as an option by mph_az · · Score: 5, Insightful

    however, I think that if you make it mandatory (no idea if tfa says either way) then I think this could create some very serious damage to any open source unlucky enough to get coerced 'help'.

    also, bear in mind that before you drool over the prospect of conscripts to do the grunt work in X.org or kde that any program worthwhile would probably allow them to choose which projects to help out in; and if they all decide that the best way to spend their time is to develop and perfect a tcl front end to cdrecord, that's their choice.

    Frankly, I'd prefer that OSS help remain completely voluntary. Getting half-hearted help is worse than getting no help at all.

    1. Re:I think that it's great as an option by qewl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of times code has to go through a lot of strict review by the app's board before it can be implemented into the OSS. But, even if most of the learning coders' code wasn't implemented, they would still learn something which would be beneficial to their overall knowledge and ability to find a job. And there is always a need for people to write hardware drivers.

      --

      (\_/)
      (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    2. Re:I think that it's great as an option by awful · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It wouldn't be mandatory - the way "mutual obligation" is supposed to work is that Centrelink is supposed to try and find you a position that matches your interests and skills. Of course if you have no skills or interests you run the risk of being put to work picking up litter by the side of the road.

      In my brother's case, he was interested in audio-engineering. Centrelink placed him as a volunteer producer in a community radio station, and from there he got a job at a mastering studio.

      So in the case of coding for OSS projects - it would be voluntary. And even if someone did provide half-hearted help (i.e. bad code) there's no obligation on the part of the project to accept the code.

    3. Re:I think that it's great as an option by boron+boy · · Score: 1

      It is an option. You can still meet your obligation by applying for so many jobs a week. The catch is if you get offered a job, you HAVE to take it, else you lose your benefits.

    4. Re:I think that it's great as an option by MoralHazard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I missed it--where does it say that people are compelled to participate in open-source projects, or participate in volunteer programming at all?

      From TFA:

      Why? Recipients of Centrelink's Newstart allowance can fufil part or all of their 'mutual obligation' requirements by doing volunteer work for a community organisation; second is that it might be useful for students or other people starting out to get some "real live" development experience.

      It says over and over again that this is "volunteer" work, right? An OSS project can't exactly demand a certain number of programmer hours, can it? If people want to contribute, they do--and they get a check from the Aussie gov't, to boot. If they don't want to participate, they don't. They can make Access databases for their local church or boy scout troop, instead.

      And besides--every OSS project gets to pick what code actually gets committed, and what gets ignored. If the quality of the dole-programmers' stuff is shit, X.org and KDE won't include it.

      Maybe I'm missing something, though--why do you think that people getting a welfare bonus for this counts as coercion?

    5. Re:I think that it's great as an option by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      and if they all decide that the best way to spend their time is to develop and perfect a tcl front end to cdrecord, that's their choice.

      It probably wouldn't count - I would assume they would expect a project to be "established" or large enough (e.g. more than 2 developers).

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    6. Re:I think that it's great as an option by inflex · · Score: 1

      I agree - I would like to give people the opportunity to get involved in my business via coding, however it usually carries a high risk factor for me (The amount of useless code generated is incredible even with full specs and requirements laid out). The way this agreement is setup I can take the risk, get some code and possibly afford to take the time to guide the coder to rework it over and over until it comes out /right/.

      Incidently, I'm not saying my code is perfect either, usually takes me a couple of iterations to get it working right -and- structured to be usable in the future).

    7. Re:I think that it's great as an option by bamb8s · · Score: 2, Informative

      It says over and over again that this is "volunteer" work, right? An OSS project can't exactly demand a certain number of programmer hours, can it? If people want to contribute, they do--and they get a check from the Aussie gov't, to boot. If they don't want to participate, they don't. They can make Access databases for their local church or boy scout troop, instead. It's essentially "volunteer" for an approved activity or get breached and have your benefits cut off. The requirements under mutual obligation are 15 hours a week. Not completing the required hours also would leave the participant open to be breeched.

    8. Re:I think that it's great as an option by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      Right... So are you saying I'm correct, or that the OP is correct? I honestly can't tell.

    9. Re:I think that it's great as an option by mister_tim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Centrelink is supposed to try and find you a position that matches your interests and skills

      Common misperception here - all Centrelink really does is administer welfare payments. Services like putting you in an interesting Work for the Dole program or helping you find a job are done by other service providers, mainly Community Work Coordinators or Job Network members respectively.

    10. Re:I think that it's great as an option by bamb8s · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right... So are you saying I'm correct, or that the OP is correct? I honestly can't tell.

      You are correct in that it isn't the OSS Project that sets the requirements on how many hours are required to fulfil mutual obligation requirements.

    11. Re:I think that it's great as an option by lilo_booter · · Score: 1

      As someone who spent some time unemployed after the contract market contracted (if you'll pardon the pun), I can vouch that Open Source is a great way to obtain additional skills and, in my case, has lead to many contracts directly built on the Open Source work I did during the period.

      I chose the projects I worked on based on what I felt I would use - this was audio streaming and video editing.

      Result? Well, on the back of the video editing, I picked up some paid for contracts from broadcasters and software vendors (and am continuing to get more work each year).

      So, yes, if they want to do something like tcl front ends for cdrecord or whatever, great - go for it. Programming skills are gained by simply taking an idea and implementing it - it doesn't matter if the idea is original or even needed, but it does matter that you enjoy doing it and that you learn from the experience. If it leads on to better things directly, well, that's superb :-).

    12. Re:I think that it's great as an option by tpv · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I would assume they would expect a project to be "established" or large enough

      Depend which "they" you mean.

      Mutual Obligation can be fulfiled in a few ways. There are 2 that are primarily relevant to this program

      1. Training (i.e. Gain skills so you can get off welfare)
      2. Community Service (give something back in return for your welfare

      The government will require that 1 of those two are met. If CC.org can demonstrate that your front end to CDRecord was "training" then they'll be happy with that.

      Whether the "mentors" at CC.org will want to devote their time to helping you with that is another matter.

      Also, at this point I'm not sure whether CC.org will be approved to provide training for #1. It is being promoted as #2.
      But in spite of that, I doubt the government will know enough to care. If CC.org says "these people helped our community organisation", then CentreLink will sign off on it.

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    13. Re:I think that it's great as an option by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      If the quality of the dole-programmers' stuff is shit, X.org and KDE won't include it.

      If they want their code to be included, I'd suggest going to GNOME in that case :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    14. Re:I think that it's great as an option by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Well it's not like the projects are required to accept the patches created by these people. What are you thinking?

      --
      +++OK ATH
  7. Maybe I can help by mister_tim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in the Government Department that manages that Mutual Obligation policy and the main programmes around it. But I'm just an average public servant with an interest in IT - not a programmer or IT professional.

    Since they're ask for help from people who are experienced in dealing with our Department, maybe this is a way I can properly contribute to an OSS project for the first time.

    1. Re:Maybe I can help by femto · · Score: 2, Informative

      In that case please contact SLUG or turn up to one of their meetings. The next meeting is on Friday, May 27 from 6:00pm to 9:30pm at the University of Technology, Broadway, Sydney. Once you are there, have a word to whoever seems to be running the show and they will point you to the relevant person to talk to.

    2. Re:Maybe I can help by mister_tim · · Score: 1

      The next meeting is on Friday, May 27 from 6:00pm to 9:30pm at the University of Technology, Broadway, Sydney.

      Hmmm, a three hour drive for one meeting? I think I'll email instead - if I still lived in Sydney then I may have considered it.

    3. Re:Maybe I can help by jasontheking · · Score: 1

      well , where do you live then?

      the list of LUGs in australia can be found at the linux australia LUG page .

    4. Re:Maybe I can help by mister_tim · · Score: 1

      My issue is not so much that I can't make it to a LUG - I could, except that I don't run Linux. But the way I can best help is not by going to a LUG where nobody from this project is involved, but by getting in touch directly with the instigators and offering advice and help. In fact, I'm already emailing back and forth with the guy behind this, so God is in His Heaven, all's right with the world.

    5. Re:Maybe I can help by mattrumpus · · Score: 1

      Mate, do it! People other than coders are as important in oss projects. Anything to keep the wheel turning...

      Cheers

      --
      Who's with me?! I SAID... WHO'S WITH ME!!??
    6. Re:Maybe I can help by rbgemini · · Score: 1

      *cough* I work in that same department... Get back to work!

  8. Unemployed coders in Australia??? by crusty_architect · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would be surprised to see many takers for this scheme here. The IT job market is on the way up in Australia, we actually have a coding skills shortage. If you are thinking of getting involved, please look for a job instead.

    1. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by kieronb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, this could be a great way to get people other than coders involved in OSS.

      For example, all those projects where ther's little to no documentation because everyone involved is coding, not documenting? I'm sure there are lots of unemployed writers around.

      Or projects that need to market themselves better, maybe need a sleeker looking interface or website or logo or whatever? Tap into the starving artist workforce...

    2. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Tannii · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Where is this shortage?! I don't see it and I've looked.

      As a single mum who may end up having to full fill some of this mutual obligation stuff if Little Johnny has his way, this sounds like a dream come true. Upping my coding skills, contributing to the community and actually having hope that this will help you get a job .... Wait a minute! This can't be right, since when has any of these things been involved in mutual obligation for people on government payments? Mutual obligation tasks are menial, pointless and soul destroying. I expect that this program will be barred from being classed as such very soon.

    3. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by fiddlesticks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > If you are thinking of getting involved, please
      > look for a job instead.

      why? why do you care? do you think people *don't* look for jobs?

      oh, now they will, you asked them to....

    4. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by TeraCo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Where is this shortage?! I don't see it and I've looked

      Sydney for starters. If you can't get a technical job in Sydney, either you think you're more qualified than you are, or you are the worst interviwee of all time.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    5. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's on the way up from dismal.

      I don't know where the shortage came from. Last I looked there was a glut of coders out there. But I don't have any figures either way - if you could back it up I'd be mighty happy because it's something I like to keep an eye on.

    6. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Tannii · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right and the pulling down fencing as some people I know have had to do as part of "Work for the dole" gives you experience, installs a work ethic and allows you to make meaningful contacts?

      And no I haven't had any experience within the mutual obligation system as yet, but in a couple of months I may well, it's either that or allow my child to be raised by child care after school if I am forced to work.

      I take offence that the suggestion that my anti-Liberal party sentiment is both mindless and rhetoric. I have built my view of the world as I perceive it and I have the courage to voice it without ticking "Post anonymously." Regardless of what I think of your opinions, I would not suggest you are a troll, I would however suggest that in to future that you not assume that anyone who holds a different opinion to yours to be one.

    7. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Homology · · Score: 1
      Right and the pulling down fencing as some people I know have had to do as part of "Work for the dole" gives you experience, installs a work ethic and allows you to make meaningful contacts?

      The grandparent got this right : "Mutual obligation tasks are menial, pointless and soul destroying."

      You see, I know unemployed people with a PhD looking for work, and you can be sure that they are not lacking in "work ethics". But they do have to endure the type of drivel you uttering.

    8. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by KillerCow · · Score: 2, Informative

      we actually have a coding skills shortage. If you are thinking of getting involved, please look for a job instead.

      Those who are unemployed and looking for work may have a different view of things.

    9. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we actually have a coding skills shortage

      What average wages can I expect in which cities?

    10. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by mboverload · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Man, I didn't even think of that! Pretty much all programs are lacking in documentation written from a perspective of a real person. With "real people" documentation OSS will look even more appealing.

    11. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by cduffy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I post as AC because I don't have a slashdot account. Does this somehow diminish the value of my opinion?

      Yes. An opinion is more worthwhile if it has an individual willing to stand behind it and defend it -- ideally not just in the forum it's posted, but out of it as well. Note my email address above? It's given because any statement I make in slashdot is a statement I'm willing to be personally identified with. If you can't say that about the positions you take -- or are too lazy to take the effort to make said statement -- then is it really so unreasonable for your opinions to be given less consideration?

    12. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shortage - hell no.
      Many programmers are now doing Analyst and Testing positions, because employers advertise wish lists, not positions. Any programming position attracts 50+ responses.

      Many Taxi drivers are talented Indian programmers, who are heading back, because they can do better back home. Telstra just laid off how many?

      Attitude is poor - Many computer training courses are cancelled, because employers are not spending money on retraining or keeping existing employees on 3 month contracts. Zero Loyalty + Odds of being Bangalored, mean good programmers only go for leading edge stuff.

      The good news is that slash and burn of maintenance roles is a changing, with discoveries of corrupt data and other dirty linen, and unavailability of 5 year .Net bodies needed for the next uber project that promises silver bullets, bells, and whistles.

      Web advertisements are for just 8 IT graduates for a pop of 20 million at the moment. Any recruitment agency will tell you they have a surplus, and most ads are just put there to justify bringing in an import. The only interesting fact is a security clearance ADD's $30 hour, to those that have em.

    13. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by quinkin · · Score: 1
      "Having worked with welfare case managers, I can tell you that it is the minority of people who are relegated to menial tasks." - I call shenanigans. Your statement is meaningless puffery and opinion substantiated with nothing. A close friends mother has been a case manager for decades (remember DSS and CES?) and disagrees - which of them is right? Who can say, but make sure you insult the honest opinions put forward by others, you rude git.

      "I post as AC because I don't have a slashdot account. Does this somehow diminish the value of my opinion?" - Gee, posting on slashdot... what do you think Einstein?

      "I also have a general idea of what a troll is..." - Well you are doing just fine so far Mr Troll.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
    14. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Well, seven months after I got my current job and so quit sending out my résumé, I'm still getting a couple of calls/emails a week with interview offers. While I've several years' experience coding and as a DBA (PHP/MySQL, mostly), I've no degree, so you'd think I'd be the last person to get a call. (Of course, I'm still surprised I got hired by one of the "name" OSS firms, even if it was as a tech writer and not as a coder.)

      I'm in Brisbane, the situation might be different elsewhere.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    15. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by dooleys · · Score: 1

      http://www.salaryzone.com.au/salzone/candle/it/sea rch.jsp#top
      The fact that you could not find out for yourself says more about your prospects than I ever could.

    16. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Tell me, where was this supposed coding skills shortage for the five months I was looking for work?

      I'm working now, thank christ, but there hasn't been a lot of work around lately.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    17. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      who the fuck in their right mind would want to live in Sydney? Never mind the ridiculous cost of living, it's just too hard to get around.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    18. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I actually had a security clearance, to Top Secret, which has only recently expired. It didn't help me get a job, let alone add $30 to my hourly rate.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    19. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For example, all those projects where ther's little to no documentation because everyone involved is coding, not documenting?

      You mean, like Gnome2 programming?

      Try to find consistant documentation of that mess. The documentation available, i.e. shipped with Gnome2, is a random mix of Gnome2 and obsolete Gnome1 function descriptions, with no examples. You have to guess which ones nore not obsolete.

      Go to the Gnome web page, and the "documentation" there is either puff pieces (rah! rah! its soo wunderful!), Gnome1 (obsoleted), or Gtk+ (a related , but different library). Sorry, nothing on actually using Gnome2.

      They do offer to sell you a Gnome2 book, which is probably why they are hiding the real documentation.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    20. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a LIAR, Mr. cduffy+slashdot@NOspam.spamcop.net. I tried to contact you to debat this hotly contested issue but the email bounced back. Put your money where your mouth is, you cowardly pseudo-anonymous fiend!

    21. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you folks are naively assuming that you averaged unemployed bloke is going to learn to read code well enough to document it, which would essentially require them learning to program. You might get a few folks who learn to code this way, and then go on to be programmers, and probably cease writing documentation in favor of writing more code, but chances are your average blodger on the dole isn't going to plow through the linux kernal and annotate it at the 4th grade level... :)

    22. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait--

      Is that one of those fake shortages like we have here in the States, where employers fake job openings and then don't fill them? Employers do it because they use those statistics to argue to the government that more indentured hires are needed from overseas.

      Those indentured hires they then use to drive down the pay rates just so they can pay white-collar employees sub-blue-collar wages. This leads to societies like ours, where technical jobs are looked down on and kids shun training for them.

      Is that the kind of job market you have in Oz too? Fake shortages?

    23. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      Be that as it may, there is a pretty serious IT skills shortage at the moment. (At least that's what a recruiting friend tells me).

      Every time she puts an ad out, she gets 50 responses, however it is very rare that any of these have the requirements listed in the job description. Occasionally she will get lucky and get one or two genuinely qualified applicants, and they almost get the job by default.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    24. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by terrywc · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you would care to list all those programming /ITskills where there is a shortage.

      I haven't been able to find anyone else who can.

    25. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I can assure you that there is _not_ an IT skills shortage - ther's an IT _jobs_ shortage (at least in Adelaide). I've just got a job after 5 months between contracts. I think your pimp^Wrecruiter friend is lying to you.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    26. Re:Unemployed coders in Australia??? by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      I think your pimp^Wrecruiter friend is lying to you.

      Hey, I've had a full time IT job for the last 6 years, she has no reason to lie to me :)

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  9. Well.. by BrianGa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they can hire some of our unemployed (pre-India) tech workers.

  10. Good idea but... by DeathAndTaxes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it's brilliant, but I don't think it'd be too long before some software consortium/lobby group/group of "concerned citizens" pulls out the whole "don't use government resources to promote the anti-competitive forces of OSS" argument. I'd bet you can expect to see legislation drafted within a year.

    1. Re:Good idea but... by jesterzog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it's brilliant, but I don't think it'd be too long before some software consortium/lobby group/group of "concerned citizens" pulls out the whole "don't use government resources to promote the anti-competitive forces of OSS" argument.

      I don't see that happening, myself. If it did, though, perhaps anyone who has a problem with it could put their money where their mouth is and volunteer to employ some of these people to work on closed source commercialised code instead.

    2. Re:Good idea but... by dalutong · · Score: 1

      I don't know how the welfare benefits are in Australia, but my concern here isn't that there would be litigation, but that people would actually just happily stay on the welfare rolls because they can then work on whatever project they'd like. I personally would love to see that happen, but it would be bad for the welfare program.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    3. Re:Good idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be political suicide for the Australian government, who has put so much effort into promoting the benefits of 'mutual obligation'.

    4. Re:Good idea but... by _undan · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is Australia we're talking about. I can only think of ONE shrink-wrapped product that's developed here that has made any impact. (MYOB)

      Whereas I know for a fact that the developer of Webmin is an Aussie, as well as one of the key contributors to OpenSSL. Plus, a few others I've heard about.

      Microsoft Australia is nothing but a marketing and publishing arm... no actual development is done here, AFAIK.

      Plus, what with the Govt publishing guidelines on using OSS, I can't see it being a bad thing.

    5. Re:Good idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      you left out samba...

    6. Re:Good idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that bad? The dole is a lot less expensive than paying a coder, and the AU government gets better OSS tools.

      So cheap coding labour in response for not being able to tell what to code on seems like a fair trade.

    7. Re:Good idea but... by Yakman · · Score: 1

      This is Australia we're talking about. I can only think of ONE shrink-wrapped product that's developed here that has made any impact. (MYOB)

      It may not technically be shrinkwrapped but I remember reading somewhere that a lot of development on Websphere is done in some R&D centre on the Gold Coast. Then again, there's another story on /. today that IBM is laying of 13,000 people.. :)

    8. Re:Good idea but... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Oh, is MS down under as well?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    9. Re:Good idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about commercial software - very little commercial software is developed here, so the "anti-competitive OSS" is really irrelevant. There's nothing much really for it to compete against.

  11. I don't think John Howard will approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mutual Obligation has always been about punishment, not improving work prospects - unless the government knows there will soon be a massive demand for fence painters and tree planters.

    1. Re:I don't think John Howard will approve by andy+jenkins · · Score: 1

      Besides which, the Howard government will kill dead anything that doesn't directly benefit Australia financially, removing the risk it may cost.

    2. Re:I don't think John Howard will approve by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      Your comments are so wrong about "punishment, not improving work prospects " - The whole idea is that people work.

      I am a Recruiter - I have real experince with the difference between what people say they can do and what they really can. Sames goes for "what" they want to do. I've done factory work, I've cleaned toilets, I've done programming. Now tell me again how you have been punished?

      Face facts: If you come in for an interview and you have a willingness and experience to do work then you are more favourably considered than those who don't.

      Work is work. Your "fun" is fun but work is work even if you love/hate it it is still work.

      Good luck on getting a job you enjoy. Sincerly. (It is out there)

    3. Re:I don't think John Howard will approve by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

      Mutual Obligation has always been about punishment, not improving work prospects

      -1, Ignorant.

      The idea in Australia, as well in the rest of the world, is to make it sufficiently unattractive to recieve welfare. If it was about punishment, welfare itself should be taken away altogether and replaced with jailtime.

      It's about making the jump from "Doing nothing, getting welfare" to "Doing a job, getting a salary" as smooth as possible when a proper job turns up.

      Skilled labor will always have a higher entry salary than unskilled, and thus this groups incentive is obviously economic. Unskilled labor will have an entry salary, typically closer to the poverty line, which is obviously also where the welfare check would be. This group will need another incentive, such as getting a noncrappy job, to leave(*) welfare. The more pleasant being on welfare is, the more noncrappy the job would have to be.

      I don't hate poor people and I recognize that wellfunctioning welfare is paramount to keep societies running smooth. Niether do I mind paying taxes to run it. But getting ''free'' government money is a very dangerous situation for almost anybody.

      (*) No, it's not explicitly the choice of the enemployed person wether to leave welfare, though there are various tools for a person to get back into the program, such as getting fired.

    4. Re:I don't think John Howard will approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.
      What a pathetic life you lead.

      I feel sorry for you.

      I like my work.

    5. Re:I don't think John Howard will approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If it was about punishment, welfare itself should be taken away altogether and replaced with jailtime.

      No, that would just be very STRONG punishment. I get paid a decent wage to work on other peoples problems 40 hours a week, but If I could get paid a subsistance wage to spend 60 hours a week writing the free software that I chose to, I would take it in a second. The trouble is, because that work would be fun, not punishingly boring like scrubbing toilets, there would be no incentive for me to stop that life and move to real paid employment.

      Would it help my work skills? Yes. Is it punishing? No, and hence it is unsuitable for Mutual obligation.

    6. Re:I don't think John Howard will approve by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      ROFL!

      Like your job do you? Hmmmm

      I LOVE mine!

      As I tell my fellow workers on Friday "Good News only 3 sleeps until Monday!!!!!!!"

      If only we all felt the same way then .... what would be possible!

      Glad you are happy Mr AC

      Regards

      GG.

  12. centrelink workers by boron+boy · · Score: 4, Funny
    Great, I can imagine trying to explain this to the centrelink workers (the people to whom you have to prove your mutual obligation).

    Centrelink: so what jobs have you applied for in the last two weeks?

    You: None, but i've been working on CommunityCode.org doing OSS development.

    Centrelink: what?

    You: I've been doing free software work to get experience and stay a productive member of society.

    Centrelink: That's all well and good but I've got a job available at a chicken slaughterhouse I think you should apply for.

    Groan.

    1. Re:centrelink workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      That's all well and good but I've got a job available at a chicken slaughterhouse I think you should apply for.
      Well that beats the pants off working for EA.
    2. Re:centrelink workers by mister_tim · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know that you're being funny, but in all seriousness the way to do it would probably be get it set up as a Work for the Dole project, by becoming a WftD sponsor. For it to satisfy requirements for Mutual Obligation in its own right - that would be more complex and it would pretty much need to be an official Government programme.

      The other way to get ahead would be to apply for the project to apply for resources (i.e. money) through the Employment Innovation Fund. If it was accepted there, it would be a quick way of getting some official Government recognition and money behind it. Overall, it would go a long way if it could show that it had a training component as well as just extra experience for people who already know how to code.

    3. Re:centrelink workers by snowdropper · · Score: 2, Informative

      It may have been modded up funny, but that is the unfortunate truth on how utterly painful it is to deal with Centrelink.

      Lucky they give me money in return.

    4. Re:centrelink workers by _undan · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not that bad. I lasted 5 months on Newstart applying for jobs I had no qualifications for in order to make my quota. They didn't blink.

      A guy I knew who had been on it for three years was placed in a voluntary position developing websites for a community organisation. He'd never done HTML in his life, but he was interested in computers.

      Another friend who had dropped out of Uni also receieved funds to pay for textbooks and non-HECS fees to go back and finish her degree.

      Centerlink does actually work, if you're willing to work too.

      If they get qualified / talented people, they will try to find them jobs in their industry. It's only after being terminally unemployed and not doing anything about it that they start turning into job facists.

    5. Re:centrelink workers by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 1

      The point of Newstart etc is to provide you with an income until you can find work. Not until you find your dream job. If you want to code OSS go for it - all power to you. However it's not up to the taxpayer to fund your unemployment benifits while you do it.

    6. Re:centrelink workers by boron+boy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If they get qualified / talented people, they will try to find them jobs in their industry.

      In my experience they(centrelink) don't do anything but hand you over to a private company who is the one supposed to be finding you an appropriate job. These companies then get commisions if they get you off the dole. The commision for short term unemployed people is small. They spend most of their resources trying to get the long term unemployed (1 year+) a job, because then they get big bonuses.

    7. Re:centrelink workers by _undan · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. They don't do any of the job-finding work themselves. But I'm abstracting to make a point.

      There are parts of it that suck, but it's not as bad as a lot of people make it out to be.

    8. Re:centrelink workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a typical capitalist.

      To people like you, the grass is greener on the other side and someone must be held accountable for making it so.

      Get a clue.

    9. Re:centrelink workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...I just woke up one day and walked into a good job that just had my name written on it, right? Forget all the manual late night jobs Ive had in the past to make a buck...hey...I dont have a clue about what its like not to have money do I? I dont go around bleating about how the world owes me a living which obviously means that everything was handed to me on a silver platter doesnt it?

      Im not sure how the grass is greener on the other side comes into it? Most people I know in IT started with burger flipping type jobs or worse, totally unrelated to IT, to save the money to study and do uni or get certs or the such. They swallowed their pride, not this "I wont work in anything outside IT" bullshit that you seem to think is a perfectly acceptable attitude because the tasks might be too degrading.

      If you dont have a job the world does not owe you a living. Nobody owes you a good IT job. I think you are the one who needs a clue.

    10. Re:centrelink workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you dont have a job the world does not owe you a living."

      Whats important is that everyone does their best to make net contribution to society.

      Writing/maintaining OSS code is a valuable long term contributing to society.

      I think there are a lot more high paid "workers" who dont pull their weight and are a net drain on society (takers), than there are underemployed people who try to avoid contriuting to society.

    11. Re:centrelink workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think were talking about slightly different people here. Writing OSS is most definitely contributing to society, no disagreements. I just got the impression that the original poster thought Centrelink was there to receive payments from until they found a good IT job. I humbly apologise if this was not the case. Totally agree that many top people certainly dont deserve the money they receive and there are many underemployed people who contribute an enormous amount to society.

  13. The problem with this... by wcitech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with this idea is that you will get the lower possible quality workmanship from the majority of people who contribute. Anybody who's ever done mandatory community services (and didn't get paid) can vouch that their heart wasn't in it. This might sound "fun" to an unemployed geek, but the quality of work is going to be signficantly lower than, say, somebody who WANTS to write OSS.

    1. Re:The problem with this... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      why would people that don't want to write OSS contribute?

      I'm not sure you understand the system.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:The problem with this... by kanweg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given people's lacking ability to properly predict what is going to happen in the future, I think the proof of the pudding is in the eating (or whatever this english expression goes).

      Wait and see. The world has been shaped by people who try new things, not by people who stop things before that.

      Bert

  14. Out of work? by eastshores · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So these people are out of work and can possibly implement OSS as a benefit to their community and therefore collect unemployment? Are you kidding me?

    Perhaps if they were employees of a gov program that got cut that would make sense, but why would we start paying those that jumped on the high risk bandwagon 80% of their salary. I know a lot of slashdotters are going to be upset at that, but give me a break! Be compoetetive.

    IT work means a lot of different things to diff people. I'm interested to see how it goes. If I can influence further changes I will.

    1. Re:Out of work? by _undan · · Score: 1

      Dude, Newstart pays sweet fuck all, and the hoops you have to jump through to keep getting it are a good incentive to get off it.

      I'm making THREE TIMES as much as a Junior web grunt as I was when I was on the dole.

      Get your facts together.

  15. Disturbing. by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This might seem like an odd perspective, but if people are put out of work by the availability of open source competition and are contributing to the problem simply to remain 'on the dole', doesn't this system effectively screw professional programmers?

    It's like all the negative of outsourcing without the positive of improving someone else's economy.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Disturbing. by martinX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that Aussie programmers would be more likely to be out of work because of (a) PHB buying off-the-shelf software (usually made in US) or (b) having their job outsourced to another country, I'd say that the number put out of work by OSS would be less than one. At a guess.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    2. Re:Disturbing. by berj · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know where you get the idea that out of work developers were put there because of the availability of OSS. Any facts to back that up?

      It seems to me that the availability of OSS would be, at worst, neutral to the number of jobs available to programmers. Even if my company used nothing but OSS software for our work we would still need developers for plug-ins and fixes.

    3. Re:Disturbing. by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This might seem like an odd perspective, but if people are put out of work by the availability of open source competition and are contributing to the problem simply to remain 'on the dole', doesn't this system effectively screw professional programmers?

      That's a pretty big "if"... Statements like this betray a basic concept that there's a total of NN software that needs to be developed, and that any amount satisfied by OSS is that much less bread to eat by developers

      However, demand for software neither fixed nor predetermined. How many jobs have been lost as a result of the free availability of communications by the Internet? See, the cost of international, interpersonal communication dropped through the floor with the Internet - what about all those lost jobs in telecommunications?

      I'm sure the Internet has cost SOME people their jobs, but how many new jobs popped up out of nowhere, doing web design, Intranet sites, database work, RPC and "middleware" based on this "free" Internet technology?

      OSS works much the same way. Rather than create a condition of scarcity, it instead creates an environment of plenty - plenty of ideas to explore that otherwise wouldn't due to prohibitive cost, many of which will turn out to be very profitable.

      Commonly addressed needs get commoditized by OSS software - Mail servers, databases, web servers, operating systems are all or are becoming commodities. The value, then, moves up the food chain a bit to providing services on top of these commodities.

      You don't make much money selling tomatoes, but you might do very well selling food cooked with tomatoes at a restaurant. Same ideas with OSS software.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:Disturbing. by dedazo · · Score: 1
      PHB buying off-the-shelf software (usually made in US)

      And PHB using off-the-sourceforge software to eliminate programmer jobs is an impossibility, I assume? For example, picking up phpBB or Plone or some other FOSS CMS to run their website?

      BTW, how is the software being made in the US relevant here?

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    5. Re:Disturbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example: The University of Newcastle (Australia) bought a US software system to manage their student records instead of a local system developed by Monash University. The Monash system was suited to Australian conditions as it was developed in Australia, whereas the US system required modification and extensive changes to University procedure.

    6. Re:Disturbing. by kanweg · · Score: 1

      Given the fact that I, as an employer, try to avoid proprietary software and want to customize the software that I use to provide better services to my clients, I disagree with you. More OSS programming by unemployed people will in the end get more people with OSS skills inside companies once they get a job (or start their own company based on OSS).

      I think that, while the whole world may benefit from Australia's unemployed programmers, in the end it is Australia that will benefit the most, because it is their businesses who will benefit from the OSS expertise these people will have.

      And finally, your conclusion that there would be no positive on someone ele's economy is wrong. If money is saved on software by comapnies, they will spend it on something else. BTW, I'm spending MORE on software because of this customization. I don't mind that, as long as it results in increased revenues due to better services. OSS allows me to provide the services "now", or very soon, instead of having to wait until some proprietary software vendor deems it ok to include a particular feature I need. I still get mad over Word's bugs virtually every day.

      Bert

    7. Re:Disturbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and RMIT almost went broke due to a botched Peoplesoft installation. Hah!

    8. Re:Disturbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant to write "OS" (meaning "overseas") but had a brain spasm. Being made OS is relevant because that means the PHB is buying software that's not made here anyway so there'd be nothing for the programmer to do regardless.

      I understand where you're coming from and will say that there may be a case where a PHB has taken something open source and used it rather than hiring someone, but given that a lot of that open source stuff needs to be customised and looked after, then there's still a job in it somewhere.

      Having said that, there are some city councils that refuse to apply for "work-for-the-dole" workers here because they see it as "forced" labour and don't want to displace paid workers. It's not as bad as the councils make out, though. Their objections are more ideological than anything.

      Having OSS projects to work on while unemployed might at least rescue programmers from the ignominy of digging ditches or painting fences :-) Mind you, anyone unemployed long enough to be required to participate in this scheme might call into question their skills...

    9. Re:Disturbing. by Sproggit · · Score: 1

      Precisely why so many dumbass executives are willing to believe Commercial s/w FUD.

      If an open source product is competition then you are simply not a capable product value adder.

      Comercial coders should make money customising products for individual customers, not by trying to out-produce the creative commons.

      I do performance testing, and one of my clients' business is implimenting Peoplesoft solutions. Do they write Peoplesoft code? No. Do they sell Peoplesoft packages? No.
      Yet they make a good living implimenting and customising a shrink wrapped product.

      This is the same future for OSS implimentations.

      Contributing to a common knowledge base should NEVER hurt individual creativity.

      The only professional programmers that can get screwed are those that become outclassed by developers trained by this initiative.

      Good god man, are you that desperate to hang on to mediocrity that you are willing to dig and dig until you find a minute possibility of any negative affects of advancement of the common good?

      No its not an odd perspective, its a bloody stupid one.

      BTW:
      As far as your sig' goes.
      Quoting Yoda and then attributing the quote to Spock with a false stardate should be an offence punishable by inverse crucifiction and evisceration while exposed to endless viewing of Yentl

    10. Re:Disturbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if people are put out of work by the availability of open source competition...

      Complete and utter misinformation! Do you have any concrete proof to back this up?

  16. Re: chicken slaughterhouse jobs by Col+Bat+Guano · · Score: 1, Funny
    Are they that different?

    I want you to get to the guts of this algorithm.
    I want you to get to the guts of this...

    Can you run that server headless?
    Can you run that ... headless?

    I've just found the shell!

  17. Microsoft Beware! by D_Lehman(at)ISPAN.or · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bill Gates is pushing for more H1-B's, even with the US computer engineer unemployment rate higher than the national average (which is the real reason colleges are seeing fewer apply for CS degrees). Beware Bill and every other software company out there, if the US ever followed suit. They might just get paid by the state to code your competition.

    I wish I could fill out an application to be an (oxymoron) paid/unemployed OSS worker. :D

    --
    Cleaning the net one sed at a time! s/sex/sermons/; s/hot/holy/; s/goats/thebible/; www.holysermonswiththebible.com
    1. Re:Microsoft Beware! by Froggy · · Score: 1

      Ah, but all Microsoft has to do in order to take advantage of this new, cheap labour supply is... open-source Windows. :)

      --
      It is a woman's prerogative to change other people's minds.
  18. OSS Chain Gang. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Recently an organisation called CommunityCode has been established to allow recipients to fulfill this requirement by contributing to OSS projects."

    Well hey! Why not have prisoners work on OSS? They have plenty of time on their hands.

    1. Re:OSS Chain Gang. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free food with "room" service, Internet access, lots of free time, sounds great...

      *beats up an old lady*

    2. Re:OSS Chain Gang. by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Well if they know how to code and choose to do that instead of whatever other community service they would otherwise be doing then why not?

  19. What a great idea! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Let's get all the homeless coding software that benefits society. That would give a new definition to "hidden workforce" and "underground economy". Of course, Bill Gates would have a problem with this if they're not programming for Windows and the Almighty Dollar. There is a difference between communism and capitalism.

  20. Good Idea by katana · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because what's better than a nation of exiled convicts? A nation of unemployed construction workers writing libfetchporn 0.9, that's what.

    1. Re:Good Idea by Bad+to+the+Ben · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wrong on both counts. Australians were never "exiled", we were and still are proud members of the British Commonwealth. And Australia was not originally discovered with the intent of making a penal colony, the convicts were sent a little later to perform labour and farm work, because England had no more room for them.


      And as for us being a pack of halfwits, check out some famous Australian inventions. Not bad for a nation of 25 million people.

    2. Re:Good Idea by katana · · Score: 1

      And all this time I thought you became proud members of the Commonwealth with the federation of the colonies (and subsequent change to Dominion status) in 1901. Populated, as you say, with convicts who could not remain in England. *cough* exile *cough*.

      And seriously, that page counts "refrigerator" and "refrigeration" as two separate inventions. Until I saw that page I didn't think you had a sense of humo(u)r.

    3. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1950s Lagerphone- The lagerphone is a musical instrument made by nailing beer caps onto a stick. It is not known who invented it, but in the 50s it was popularised by the Heathcote Bushwackers as an alternative to the American wobbleboard." rofl... some of those are pathetic excuses for inventions

    4. Re:Good Idea by MasterB(G)ates · · Score: 1

      We only have just over 20 million people http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/94713ad445 ff1425ca25682000192af2/1647509ef7e25faaca2568a9001 54b63?OpenDocument.

      Thus I have upgraded your compliment from "not bad" to "a bit of alright"

      --
      In the Slashdot moderating system, humourless based offenses are considered especially heinous.
    5. Re:Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize you're the only one who's hinting that Aussies are "halfwits", right?

  21. Misery loves company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let's put some more people out of work, huh?

  22. I for one like this idea by inflex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a small business developer, I would love this sort of thing.

    Quite often it's very hard to get people to do some work without forking out large amounts of money and you're not always sure about the end results (I've had some really terrible code handed in by contractors - worse than even mine).

    I have quite a handful of projects, all openSource which would definately gain from this sort of interaction.

    Paul.

    1. Re:I for one like this idea by mister_tim · · Score: 1

      As a small business developer, I would love this sort of thing.

      Except that they're talking about doing it as a Work for the Dole project, which carries the requirement that it must be with a not for profit/community organisation, for the very reason that it's meant to not put someone else out of a job.

    2. Re:I for one like this idea by inflex · · Score: 1

      That's fine - we've got over a dozen OpenSource projects that could all do some some work. While the projects are originally copyright by us they are still OpenSource (under the BSD revised licence).

      Just because we originally created the projects and periodicaly fund their development should not preclude us from being able to be involved in this Work-for-dole thing... should it?

    3. Re:I for one like this idea by mister_tim · · Score: 1

      Could work - maybe you could email the guy running this and check with him?

    4. Re:I for one like this idea by syousef · · Score: 1

      Quite often it's very hard to get people to do some work without forking out large amounts of money and you're not always sure about the end results (I've had some really terrible code handed in by contractors - worse than even mine).

      I'm a successful developer who makes a decent salary and I would HATE to work for you. You're a user and your attitude is what's wrong with employers today. You leave burnt out shells in your wake so you can prosper.

      So you like it because you get stuff for free, at the expense of hard work from other people...and hey because it cost you nothing who cares what happens to the code or the person that made the attempt for you. So why spend money looking for someone good? Let 50 people who'll each get nothing but their meagre doll cheque FROM THE GOVERNMENT slave away for you, and let them pick each other off in competition. If it works out you may hire 1 of them...then again why not hire another 50 free labourers so you don't have to pay anyone, and meanwhile you can claim to be supporting the community and helping workers get back on their feet.

      Guess what! WRONG! It won't work. Bottom line: If you pay peanuts you get monkeys!

      Get off your backside and do the leg work to find decent workers. You'll be surprised what continuity and a stable development team with a low attrician rate will do for your company. Learn to tie the end result to renumeration so that they have an incentive not to just do the minimum for you.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:I for one like this idea by inflex · · Score: 1

      *hands over an iceblock* here, hold this - you need to cool down.

      I actually do 99% of my own work, over a dozen Opensource projects and one commercial project, which incidently funds donations to other Opensource projects (not just my own).

      I am not interested in slave-labour, I much rather have one good worker/contractor I can rely on. Slave labour as such gains nothing for anyone.

      My original point was (which seems to have been misconstrued) that it's difficult to find people who have good coding standards, who aren't trying to use all sorts of crazy code tricks to show-off, who actually -can- work within set specifications.

      There's a lot of people out there who read a "Learn C in 24 hours" book and suddenly decide that they can put that on their CV "C programmer" or who have done some perusing of HTML and all of a sudden are "WWW developers". The problem at hand isn't that these people are starting out, well all have to start somewhere, it's the disparity between their skills and their perceived value (per hour), think back to the dot.com era.

      So, back to the original concept of community-code, I think it's a great idea still. If there are skilled coders out there, then they get to code "for the dole" without having to be pushed into a road-side clean up. For those less-skilled coders, this gives them an opportunity to get some experience and feedback. For people like myself, it gives us a chance to interact with more local coders (we don't all live in the big cities) and possibly strike up some future collaborations.

    6. Re:I for one like this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if your small business can benefit from "unpaid" labour (they're not getting paid like "real" coders, are they?), why shouldn't it? In fact, if you're lucky, maybe the government can find you some slaves somewhere too.

      Am I the only one who sees this scheme as exploitation?

    7. Re:I for one like this idea by syousef · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of people out there who read a "Learn C in 24 hours" book and suddenly decide that they can put that on their CV "C programmer" or who have done some perusing of HTML and all of a sudden are "WWW developers".

      Then that's your fault. You need to ask for and verify their credentials. Check that they have done real development work and have references. Ask for a degree. If they can't produce these you either don't hire or you hire at a reduced pay rate until they proove themselves.

      I'm not asking that you allow yourself to be burnt, but I think you're actually taking advantage of down and out developers with your current approach, whether that's your intention or not.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:I for one like this idea by inflex · · Score: 1

      "I'm not asking that you allow yourself to be burnt, but I think you're actually taking advantage of down and out developers with your current approach, whether that's your intention or not."

      A few points you should be aware of:

      - They choose if they want to be involved

      - They only code on OpenSource software (I suppose then the whole community is taking advantage of them)

      - It allows them to avoid having to do other work that they might not have been wanting to (cleaning up roadside litter vs programming?)

      - They get credited for doing the work and subsequently don't get harassed by the departments

    9. Re:I for one like this idea by syousef · · Score: 1

      - They choose if they want to be involved

      Wrong. You're a qualified techy and refuse tech work, good luck collecting your cheque. That's not what I call choice. This work like a dog (work for the dole) thing is simply a sweatshop cheap labour s cam.

      - It allows them to avoid having to do other work that they might not have been wanting to (cleaning up roadside litter vs programming?)

      These people should be looking for a full time paid job, not picking up litter and not programming for free. They have families to feed and lives to live.

      - They get credited for doing the work and subsequently don't get harassed by the departments

      I love how people justify forced labour. If they're doing the work, why are they collecting about a fifth of the pay????

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    10. Re:I for one like this idea by inflex · · Score: 1

      All I can say then is why don't you come and join the cc-talk mailing list and see how the actual people who are being offered this feel. Would be good to have some constructive counter-opinons and dialog.

  23. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by martinX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because they (the bosses) can see the quality of the work you've done for another project, so then they can pay you to do their project.

    It's not like every possible piece of software in the world is an OSS project. Someone may want something different.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  24. excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wouldn't mind being payed to live a VERY simple life and work on OSS projects that would benefit many. Many countries already have programs where they pay individuals to keep traditional arts alive (Chine/Japan) or keep ancient religion traditions alive (Isreal), so why not keep code alive?

  25. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're willing to give it away for free why would anyone bother hiring you to do it for money?

    Uh... because then you'd work on the projects they want you to work on and they could make money off of the result.

  26. Not necessarily by jesterzog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This might seem like an odd perspective, but if people are put out of work by the availability of open source competition and are contributing to the problem simply to remain 'on the dole', doesn't this system effectively screw professional programmers?

    It's an interesting perspective to take. At the very least, though, I think that any argument along those lines would have to be weighed out against arguments that:

    • The improvement of improved open source products, which are available for free, boosts the potential productivity of other businesses that rely on them. The main exception to this might be the specific businesses who might produce competitive products, and many of these aren't based in Australia, anyway. Companies who merely re-sell and support competitive products may still be able to move their business to open source equivalents.
    • By encouraging people to work on open source products, the same people are improving their skills, and their qualifications for deploying open source products effectively... particularly the ones in which they've been involved.

    Without more information I don't know how much credibility these arguments have, but I think they'd need to be considered.

  27. More productive than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..some people I know on the dole (welfare) who fulfill their obligation by fragging each other (in whatever LAN game is popular currently) for a day a week. I mean, come on, are they practicing to be game testers or what?

    1. Re:More productive than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the army is a good career choice these days! On the other hand, it's a better "use" for all those people who like to gamble than filling the pockets of casino owners.

      But back on topic, I'm pretty sure that my years of doing OSS development were instrumental in getting me a job so easily when I decided to try. If the government had of paid me when I was doing it then I sure as hell wouldn't have complained!

      Ironically I'm now doing VB.NET and have an MSCD.NET certification, and haven't used Linux in the two years I've been employed. I was running Linux, often exclusively, for 7 years before that while doing OSS.

  28. OSS programmed by rejects? by Balial · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's the programmers that Microsoft rejects that will make OSS the best.

  29. Seems like a plan by jonno317 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems that the comments thus far have been centered around the idea that the unemployed are being forced to work on OSS. I think it is more the idea that working on OSS is an acceptable form of community service and the like. I don't think that the arguments against the idea because of the lack of volunteering hold much water because of this. Those who choose to work on OSS to fulfill their community service responsibilities would be just as much volunteers as the rest of the OSS community. It's no different from an OSS person putting their development onto their resume. It's just using the volunteer work on the software for dual purpose.

  30. Does it have to be code? by Noviota · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Could the volunteers write documentation, design web sites, graphics etc. There is a lot more to an OSS Project than just the pure code!

    --


    Noviota.
    De Novo. Iota.
    Starting Afresh. Very Small.
    1. Re:Does it have to be code? by tuxR0x · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, ASAIK it can be anything related to an OSS project ie artwork, docs etc. Also the quality of the work is monitored by a 'mentor' who is responsible for signing off on the work contributed by the volunteer and any "bludgers" can be booted from the scheme.

  31. State sponsored OSS by jesterzog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What happens when the aussie economy does better with a legion of state sponsored oss programmers?

    I think it's worth considering that for any company that produces closed source commercial software, there will probably be many others that could benefit from and improve their productivity with good open source software, but can't necessarily afford to pay for the developers themselves, nor the commercial counterparts.

    Before jumpling to conclusions that it's state-sponsored competition, I think that this angle should be considered. The economy is made of more than just the commercial software production industry, just as the IT industry encompasses more than simply commercial software development.

    Is this worth state sponsorship? Perhaps, or perhaps not, or maybe it's at the very least a good place for interested people to be while they're between paid work, as the article suggests.

    Keep in mind that contributing to OSS while on a benefit doesn't release someone from their obligations of getting off the benefit, nor should it. It does give the appropriate people an activity in which they can maintain their skills whilst they're looking for other work. I think this organisation is mostly trying to formalise it, to make it a credible and understood activity for government agencies.

    1. Re:State sponsored OSS by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's worth considering that for any company that produces and charges for motor vehicles, there will probably be many others that could benefit from and improve their productivity with free motor vehicles, but can't necessarily afford to pay for the motor vehicles themselves.

      And for every farmer that charges for produce, there will be thousands who would be better off if they got the produce for free.

      There appears to be a tiny flaw in this point somewhere, just cant put my finger on it.

    2. Re:State sponsored OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you copy information, the original is still there.
      You can't take the motor from the company and still
      expect it to be there.

      There is more, but it follows from the above.

    3. Re:State sponsored OSS by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 1

      Oh I see - so if a commercial software vendor receives no income from sales they are still in a perfectly good financial position as they still have their information. I get it now!

    4. Re:State sponsored OSS by magicmartinsmuffinma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, there is a flaw, in that the marginal costs of motor cars and food are non-zero, whereas the marginal cost of distributing software is approaching zero.

    5. Re:State sponsored OSS by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 1

      Yes, the marginal cost of distrubuting software is approaching zero, mind you that conveniently leaves out all the other aspects. Employees dont work for free. Business premises cost money. Advertising / marketing / legal cost money. Suppliers certainly dont come free. Along with IT infrastructure, any purchsed software, customer support channels, telephony infrastructure, miscellaneous expenses etc and you definitely have non zero costs to recover plus profit still to make. It is very interesting that you ignore these costs and only discuss the distribution. I suppose a doctor / lawyer / accountant / tradesman should work for free as well as it does not cost them any money to distribute their service?

    6. Re:State sponsored OSS by fforw · · Score: 1
      Oh I see - so if a commercial software vendor receives no income from sales they are still in a perfectly good financial position as they still have their information. I get it now!
      Of course all people should be required to demand a minimum price for their work and not to use open or free software licenses to secure the profit of commercial software vendors. Otherwise they deserve to be disowned so that the poor software companies can take their work without following those pesky licenses.
      --
      while (!asleep()) sheep++
    7. Re:State sponsored OSS by magicmartinsmuffinma · · Score: 1
      I agree with all that, I was merely pointing out the (most obvious) difference between the OP and your counter-examples.

      People don't work for free in any profession, naturally. Including IT, and even in this case they are having to do some work in order to get their dole payments. So I suppose I'm completely failing to get your point.

    8. Re:State sponsored OSS by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      [--snip--] And for every farmer that charges for produce, there will be thousands who would be better off if they got the produce for free.

      If someone were prepared to produce food and give it away, I'd be fine with that. It's what people do with their own vegetable gardens all the time, after all. The fact that it doesn't happen everywhere means that there's a viable business in producing and selling food. But just because someone's producing and selling food shouldn't be a reason to complain about someone else giving it away.

      If the government was paying the person a benefit, then of course I'd want the person to be aiming to get off the benefit. But if developing and/or maintaining one's gardening skills through self-initiative happens to be a good way to do that, then good on 'em.

      The benefit's not there to "pay" people to do stuff. If you're on it, then it should be your primary job to get off it. It's there to support someone while they work to find another source of income, as I tried to say before.

      OSS development is something that people will do anyway in their free time, just like gardening. If an OSS product that's developed and provided for free happens to undermine a commercial product, then it's too bad for that product.

      It's also credible to say that people with good OSS development skills may have a better chance of employment than people without them. I think the point of this whole exercise is to give some credibility to the development of OSS as the maintenance or development of one's skills with the aim of future employment. Otherwise someone could quite validly be developing their employment prospects for a good job, but have their efforts ignored by a naive employment official because they're not doing anything for recognised organisations.

      I have no problem with this, as long as people who develop OSS are still working to get a job that doesn't require the benefit. If the same could be said about gardening, or somehow magically producing and giving away vehicles for free whilst receiving a benefit, then fine.

    9. Re:State sponsored OSS by Ithika · · Score: 1

      Employees don't work for free... but never have anyway. To bring this up as being particularly relevant to the software industry is disingenuous. Car designers, mechanics and the people in Honda's PR department don't work for free either!

      Remove the cost of employees from both sides of the equation - assuming equal outlay on each - and you're still left with car engines etc a non-zero marginal-cost good and software a (within certain tolerances) a zero marginal-cost good.

    10. Re:State sponsored OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There appears to be a tiny flaw in this point somewhere, just cant put my finger on it.

      You mean that all of you examples consume finite resources and hence have an inherent cost, while software is can effectively be reproduced without additional costs?

    11. Re:State sponsored OSS by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      Or conversely, for every road built with tax dollars, there is a toll-road operator that is losing business, forced to compete with state sponsored infrastructure. Where the line between public and private responsibility is drawn is a political and social decision, not a moral imperative.

      Besides the state isn't sponsoring software, the state is sponsoring a back to work program. The group that is applying the back to work program to software is a private organization.

      TANSTAAFM (There ain't no such thing as a free market.) There's always some level of government involvement, whether it's to level the playing field and make the market behave more freely or to help avoid the tragedy of the commons.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    12. Re:State sponsored OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obvious flaw:

      can a motor vehicle or a cow be copied without error as many times as desired at no further cost bar storage space?

      Software is not a physical good. Free/open-source software is a valid competitor in the IT industry, it's just a competitor with a radically different business plan that doesn't revolve around maximising profits. If your software is no better than available free options, then you have no right complaining when it doesn't make you rich...

      Software companies always claim to be bringing us the Future.. they'd better get a bloody move on, because the Present is beginning to get ahead of them...

    13. Re:State sponsored OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like this "state sponsored X" stuff. It's not a question of the state sponsoring projects, it's a question of the state supporting people who are down on their luck getting the skills that will improve their chances.

      The question should be whether OSS contributions are as good a for a person's resume as their worst existing option (seems like collecting litter is a good bet). If the answer is yes, and anyone wants to take on OSS rather than collect litter, the argument should stop there.

    14. Re:State sponsored OSS by teknomage1 · · Score: 1

      I think it's worth considering that for anyone that tries to make a point on Slashdot and uses a metaphor, there will probably be many others who disagree with this and will rewrite their post to make them look logically absurd, without necessarily thinking about the real issue themselves.

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
  32. Can't see it working by aybiss · · Score: 1

    If this goes anything like other 'innovative' work for the dole schemes I've seen, I given them about 3-4 weeks before they realise they are actually losing cash and that it's not nearly as easy as it sounds. For example, you can't fire someone at all. This won't really work if you give this person access to hack at the code every day even after the relationship has long since gone sour. Aaron

    --
    It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  33. DUPE! by marafa · · Score: 1

    DUPE! not even gonna bother to look for the link

    --
    _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    1. Re:DUPE! by omahajim · · Score: 1
      with apologies to this writer,

      It's not a dupe, it's an update! OK, it's a Dupe.

  34. Bloody great idea! by phanta · · Score: 1

    I know that I would have jumped at the chance to have work on OSS code count towards my Mutual Obligation. Instead I got sent to bloody JobClub and learned how to use MS Word and write a resume...

  35. Sysadmin and systems for the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I used to do something like this, in Australia. I did my "mutual obligation" (slave labour for dole payments) at Computer Bank Victoria.

    The goal of the project was to provide cheap (free) hardware and software to underprivledged people in Australia. We used Debian for single installs, and the KDE wm.

    It was a fantastic experience - I learnt all about the insides of computers and how to put them together, com ports, (seemingly) thousands of types of cards (video, audio, nics) and how to configure them, etc etc - all common knowledge ot people here, but you need to start somewhere...

    We started a project to give thin clients away to poorer groups (libraries/community groups/refugee action collectives or whatever) which we built from the ground up using common knowledge and the wonderful xserver. I think they have since expanded the project, but now use Mandrake/driva.

    A lot of the forced vollies didn't want to be there, but for those of us that did, it was great - I spent my first month testing printers, mice, speakers and doing the last check on systems going out the door...

    There are plenty of these things around, and it sure beat weeding public gardens....

    1. Re:Sysadmin and systems for the poor by Kylie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      :)

      We still use Debian and run 'work for the dole' projects. We can also help people looking to do community work.

      See http://vic.computerbank.org.au/

  36. Almost like legal blackmail by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You see sir, if you fire me, I'll still get paid to work on a FREE product that will compete with yours."

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by flibberdi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ahhh... a touchy subject....

      I have worked on a "commercial" project that had to be closed down due to OSS "competition", so now I could/should start working for the other OSS project that "killed" us, to receive welfare payments.. right?

      Who is paying??

      My cats breath smells like catfood... :)

    2. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      If the commercial product was killed off by the competition, then something was wrong with that product.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by flibberdi · · Score: 1

      Yeah...it wasn't free (as in beer)!

    4. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it was no good.

      I mean, if spare-time coders working with unregulated methods producing an unsupported product with explicit "no warranty" clauses and no company backing to point at STILL beats your "product", how good could it have been?

    5. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by firelord2377 · · Score: 1

      That's one of the reasons why business is not in software per se. It's in services around it (docs, tech. support, training, etc.)

    6. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      please. Any job you get as a programmer will have a clause in the contract that states that you can't work on a competing product (open source or not) for a given number of months/years after leaving the company. In fact, if you tried to submit stuff to most open source projects that was related to your previous place of employment and the maintainers didn't outright reject it when they found this out, you'd get your ass sued not just by your former employer but by the free software zealots you just tried to fuck over.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by magefile · · Score: 1

      I don't know anything about Aussie law, but in Illinois (and most US states), we have what's called "Employment at Will". Among other things, it means that companies aren't allowed to keep you from working anywhere you want when you leave (well, they are in some cases, but they're extremely limited in what they can do). It also means that you don't ever *have* to work for them - you can leave any time you want (i.e., two week's notice is just a courtesy).

    8. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by shimmin · · Score: 1
      Open-source code can't kill the commercial software industry, because much of the software that needs to be written would be useful to only a small number of firms, and the OSS model doesn't work well for software that has slim-to-nil utility for the general community.

      There will be no open-source project to write the code for the XYZ-2912a widget interface, unless the 2912a becomes a popular widget, at which point the commercial coders already got paid.

      Software for sale to the general public might be in danger eventually. Software consulting has job security.

    9. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Yeah...it wasn't free (as in beer)!

      Photoshop hasn't been destroyed by The GIMP, despite the HUGE difference in price. Perhaps price was A concern, but definately not the only one.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yep, and the ENTIRE WORLD has this concept known as breach of contract which states that if you sign a contract stating you will not do X and then you go off and do X then you are required to pay damages to the party to which you entered into the contract. You're absolutely right that companies can't stop you from doing X but if you've entered into a contract that says you can't do it then you're gunna pay if they find out about it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    11. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Any job you get as a programmer will have a clause in the contract that states that you can't work on a competing product (open source or not) for a given number of months/years after leaving the company.

      You may not be able to disclose any propriatary information that you have, but how can a non-compete agreement apply to volunteer work?

      Technically, you are not working for anyone.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    12. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      The clauses say you may not be involved or otherwise interested. You should know this if you've ever signed one of these contracts as surely you've read it. If you've never signed one of these contracts then FFS just take my word for it ok? What's with you people?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    13. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I have been presented with a non-compete before. I did not sign it however. My first name begins with a "W", so does the word "Won't" so I write "Won't Agree" on any document that I feel I have been coerced into signing. If it ever comes back upon me, I can keep a straight face before a judge and say "I did not sign that document. I clearly wrote 'Won't Agree' on the signature line."

      To be fair, I don't know anything about aussie employment law, but here in the US, a non-compete agreement must be "reasonable" to be enforced. You can't make an employee agree to not work in the field at all for a period of time after their employment with you ends. That would be tantamount to slavery. Either keep working for me or starve for a year.

      You can however get an employee to agree to not work for a client for 12 months after they leave your company. You can get an employee to agree not to go to the outfit across the street when they leave.

      Again, operating under the law with which I'm familiar, no such agreement is likely to be upheld.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    14. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by magefile · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except that they're not allowed to do it. Meaning, (IIRC) under contract law in the US, the rest of the contract is still valid, but the noncompete isn't. Dumbass.

    15. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Boy oh boy, where to begin with this post. Let's start with your act of fraud. If you "sign" something with "Wont Agree" and then give that to your employer it is just as valid as signing it with your name, a big X or a smiley face. A signature is merely a record that you agree to the contract. So if you go to court and say what you suggest you say the judge will ask you "did you tell your employer that you agreed to the contract" to which you may reply that you clearly wrote "Wont Agree" on the signature line and the judge would tell you that unless you actually said you won't sign it then you did just sign it. Of course, you could then lie to the judge and get your ass thrown in prison on a completely different charge.

      With that all said, let's move onto your other disturbing statements. You can't "make" an employee sign anything. You can require someone who wants to be your employee to sign a document stating just about anything (short of forefiting their life or other such) and if they agree to it then they are bound by it. If they decide to violate that agreement they will have to pay any damages that are incurred to their previous employer. That's all. So even if you sign a document that says you can't work in the same industry for 6 months after your termination you're still free to do so, you'll just have to pay any damages that are incurred to your previous employer as a result of violating your contract. Oh, and court fees, and hiring a lawyer, etc.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    16. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Wow, so every contract I've ever signed in the IT industry includes an unenforcable clause for which I have seeked legal council and been told is valid. Perhaps you don't RC.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    17. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1
      So if you go to court and say what you suggest you say the judge will ask you "did you tell your employer that you agreed to the contract" to which you may reply that you clearly wrote "Wont Agree" on the signature line and the judge would tell you that unless you actually said you won't sign it then you did just sign it.

      Actually what I said was "Here you go." when I handed the piece of paper that I wrote "Won't Agree" on. I rejected the terms of that agreement. They chose to hire me anyway.

      Of course, you could then lie to the judge and get your ass thrown in prison on a completely different charge.

      No need to lie. I never claimed to have agreed. They may have assumed or inferred that I did, but their misunderstanding is not my fault.

      You can require someone who wants to be your employee to sign a document stating just about anything (short of forefiting their life or other such) and if they agree to it then they are bound by it.

      Depends on where you live. Where I live, employers are limited in what restrictions they can impose on former employees.

      If they decide to violate that agreement they will have to pay any damages that are incurred to their previous employer.

      In most cases the damage incurred would be $0.00. One does not financially injur a former employer by finding new employment.

      So even if you sign a document that says you can't work in the same industry for 6 months after your termination you're still free to do so, you'll just have to pay any damages that are incurred to your previous employer as a result of violating your contract.

      Once again, unless the person is disclosing trade secrets or taking clients, there is no damage to the previous employer.

      IANAL, but these guys are.
      • Non-competes have to be reasonable to be enforceable. Reasonableness is determined by the courts based on the specific facts in each case. Primary attention is given by the courts to:

      • the geographic scope of the non-compete,
        the duration of the non-compete, and
        the type of activity the ex-employee is precluded from engaging in.

      Here's another example.

      • In determining whether a non-competition agreement is valid, courts assess the following questions:


      • 1. Does the agreement protect a legitimate interest of the employer?

        2. Is the agreement too restrictive in terms of its duration? Is the agreement limited to the amount of time necessary to reasonably protect the employer?

        3. Is the agreement too restrictive in terms of the geographic boundaries specified? Is the agreement limited to the geographic areas necessary to reasonably protect the employer?

        4. Is the agreement supported by good consideration? In other words, was the agreement entered into upon the initial employment of the employee or upon advancement of the employee with the employer?

      Catch the term "Reasonably"? It's there on purpose.

      Instead of the opinions of third parties, let's see what the courts have said about it.

      Earthweb Inc. v. Schlack

      The courts held that...

      • [T]he one-year duration of EarthWeb's restrictive covenant is too long given the dynamic nature of this industry, its lack of geographic borders, and Schlack's former cutting-edge position with EarthWeb where his success depended on keeping abreast of daily changes in content on the Internet.

      In Keener v. Convergys(Google for it, I'm tired of linking pages that you probably won't read anyway)
      the court threw out a non-compete for being too restrictive.

      A non-compete must be REASONABLE for a court to enforce it. The definition of that word may be subject to the interpretatio

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    18. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Well fair enough, you clearly have had moron employers who didn't even look at your contract let alone care about it. Personally I've never worked for anyone that stupid. Even the most stupid employers I've had have looked at my signature before filing it. As for just agreeing to something and then doing the opposite (contract or not) you better hope that your future employers don't hear about your actions or you might find yourself unemployable. Of course, next you'll probably tell me that employers can't refuse to hire you based on your behaviour with previous employers.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    19. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Fortunately my employment with this particular company didn't work out for other reasons. (namely that they wanted hourly employees who would work 50 hours per week while only being paid for 40 of them.

      That was the only employer who ever presented me with a non-compete.

      Of course, next you'll probably tell me that employers can't refuse to hire you based on your behaviour with previous employers.

      Sort of. A new employer can refuse to hire someone for any (legal) reason or no reason at all. But, if a previous employer discloses too much information about you, and you don't get the job as a result. You are free to sue them.

      In my state, a previous employer is very restricted in what they are able to tell new prospective employees about you.

      Shall I bury you in sites again to prove my point?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    20. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I'm sure. But as you said, they can just give no reason. So those laws wouldn't protect you, they'd just make it hard for you to figure out why your career has been poisoned. My sole point is that if you don't like anything in your contract, even if you don't think it is enforcable, then you should have it addressed before you sign it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    21. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Basically as many silly clauses are included in the contract because you are not a lawyer and not likely to be well versed in contract law. This is done to intimidate you into complying. Any illegal clause in a contract can tend to render the whole contract null and void when put to a legal challenge. The most important things to remember about contracts are, until they are tested in court they are of questionable value and he who writes the contract is always behind the eight when it comes to any interpretation of the contract.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    22. Re:Almost like legal blackmail by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Wow, so every contract I've ever signed in the IT industry includes an unenforcable clause for which I have seeked legal council and been told is valid.

      NB, this law varies from state to state. I believe California and Virginia, for example, do not disallow such non-compete clauses. So it may well be that your lawyer gave you advice correct for your current state of residence, but if you signed the contract in Kentucky (from the poster's example), that clause might not be enforcable.

      Feel free to ask your legal counsel some more questions.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  37. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by symbolic · · Score: 1


    That's the key..."do their project". As an OSS programmer, you do what interests you. If someone want's to divert that interest to a project of their own, so be it...at which point the expectation of payment is not unreasonable.

  38. Potential problem... by Infinityis · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can see it now...

    1. OSS developers write custom management/accounting software for Welfare Program.
    2. Welfare department welcomes cutomized management/accounting software with open arms (after all, they *sponsored* software).
    3. OSS developers exploit a secret, built-in backdoor system
    4. PROFIT!!!

    No ???? needed

  39. Mod parent up by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Informative

    This OSS idea is the first time I've heard of people who have to "work for the dole" actually receiving beneficial tasks to getting a new job. The government likes to choose degrading jobs such as "paint this toilet until the paint bucket is empty." Not untily you've finished. If you finish and the buckets only half empty, guess what you're doing. You're repainting the wall.

    You don't need to degrade dole workers. Sheeesh. Because those who make a career out of it, just won't care. Whereas those who honestly can't find a job, will hate the system even more.

  40. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuff said?

    Let me tell you something and any out of work IT guys out there. I wanted a change, had been doing administration and engineering for about a decade. Was burnt. Because truth be told, while I am a die hard geek, my geekiness was never tottally on the administration side of things or on the engineering side of things. I've never been laid off or fired from a job, so I am definetly competent, I'm just not a guru when it comes to administration or engineering.

    Writing had always been something I'd enjoyed and was good at(No, I don't do my best work on slashdot, so if you judge me by this post, you're an embicile). Anyways, I jumped on several different Open Source projects to do documentation. Not going to say which ones, I'm a proud anon cow, but it paid off.

    Now I work at home, charge 90 bucks an hour, and have 3 of the top ten biotechs in this country(US) as clients. I don't have a college degree either. If you're good, this route will payoff. It will showcase how good you are. If you're some guy whose only motivation is to make good money, good luck chump.

    I was never outstanding as an administrator or an engineer, but I'm a literary gangsta when it comes to technical writing. I'm in demand, India is not a threat to me(heh, good luck competing with my english skills India!). I found what I loved, what I excelled at, a way to exploit my innate nerd nature and technical understanding and I have never been happier.

    My advice to many IT guys out there, including American IT guys who have not really found that niche they really shine in, is to try various hats in an open source project. They need more than coders, always remember that. Start at sourceforge, look through the jobs, and look for something that matches your interests. Don't look for software projects that you want to use, that isn't the way. Look at the positions available, and think deeply about what you enjoy doing most. A lot of help is needed.

    It paid of for me and I think a lot of good geeks out there who have been trying to go a route that doesn't quite let their natural inherent skills shine, might be able to find where their niche is, like I did.

    God bless Open Source. Communism/Socialism my ass. It's work baby and if you're a born capitalist like me, you can make it pay.

  41. Needs to be open to any project by wrmrxxx · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm glad to see on their web site that the program is open for 'any Free Software'. If it ever turned into an arrangement where you had to work on the projects they suggested, I'd have a real problem with it. If you were an Aussie company and wanted some software developed on the cheap, you'd just fire all of your developers. They'd be forced by Centrelink onto the work for the dole scheme, and end up doing your software development for you at $4/hour or whatever the effective rate is for the 'mutual obligation' scheme.

    The work for the dole system has lots of potential to be misused. It's a good thing we can trust our government to only ever do good things...

    1. Re:Needs to be open to any project by siveys · · Score: 1

      "The work for the dole system has lots of potential to be misused."

      I think anyone trying to misuse the system with coding labour would face the cruel reality of the quality of code developed half-heartedly.

      It would seem very unlikely that a bunch of dole workers could build a large sufficiently functional system since they would have to communicate effectively, write code that others can understand and have a general picture of the project to be able to do really beneficial work.

      Doing all this is something that really needs dedication to your work - unlike picking garbage on the side of the road. It is really hard to force dedication.

      I personally think that, like a previous poster already wrote, OSS coding should be supported by the government as for example arts are supported. Here in Finland we pour heaps of money to all kinds of artists who have devoted their life to their art because it is seen beneficial to the society. I would really like to see similiar funding and prizes for succesful OSS coders - which we do have surprisingly many for such a small coutry: linux, ssh, irc, irssi and ion have to my knowledge originated from Finland and there are heaps of other not so well known projects like FLE3, Mimerdesk, Dicole, umix and all the projects i'm not familiar with. Also Perl has been maintained by a finn a couple of year back and many many translations and greatly helping hands on larger projects have come from Finland.

      I think our coutry should aknowledge the good their citizens are doing globally which is also making our small country known around the world and support these people for their work. And I think every other country should do the same also.

    2. Re:Needs to be open to any project by terrywc · · Score: 1

      CommunityCode is NOT a Work for The Dole scheme. People have to voluntarily join CC and be motivated to do stuff. There is not one allocating them to projects.

      Further CC does not work FOR commercial entities or even NFP as there will always be the question of whether they are taking paind employment from people.

  42. Code by Phidoux · · Score: 4, Funny

    if (unemployed) {
    dole = dole * 2;
    }
    printPayslip();

    1. Re:Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while(unemployed)
      {
      dole = dole * 2;
      printPayslip();
      }

  43. it's really no different in the US by cahiha · · Score: 1

    If you're out of work, volunteering is one of the options for keeping your resume and skills up to date and staying involved in the workforce. Nobody is forcing you to do it, but it's the sensible thing to do.

  44. time to quit my job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'd be making more money off the dole to do more of what i enjoy than i do now...

  45. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (heh, good luck competing with my english skills India!)

    They were a part of the British Empire as well, you know.

  46. wow i wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn i wish i could get a job programming.. i've got a degree (not in arts either in math/physics) and cant even get a job a woolies night stacking... I think you're thinking of the situation about 5 years ago when you could get a job "admining" a "windows server" with no qualifications

  47. Cool, i'm about to be fired by mediumcool · · Score: 1

    i'll be doing more doing this than i am at my current job!!!

  48. not really soul destroying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually i would probably rather pickup needels in the cross than the crappy work-for-the-dole that is foisted on you in hurstville.... you wouldnt believe.... your choice of
    1) walking tours of the local district
    2) "design" some crappy "web page" in a group
    i think i'd learn more pulling bongs and watching tv

  49. rsync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    what about rsync

  50. Isn't government work automatically Public Domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And thus not able to be licensed/protected under GNU? Or is Gov=PD just a USA phenomenon?

  51. When they say 'coding' by Trogre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope they also include options for writing documentation and proof-reading.

    That is an area that is often lacking in OSS projects.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:When they say 'coding' by michaeldot · · Score: 1
      I hope they also include options for writing documentation and proof-reading. That is an area that is often lacking in OSS projects.

      This is so true, you should be modded +10 Knows What He's Talking About.

      Too often it seems that OSS contributers only code for other coders and have the attitude:
      "I know how to use the software, I wrote it. If you don't know how to use it, here's the source code, now spend 10 hours deciphering it."

      I'm hoping that one day there will be an RMS who preaches the great benefits to mankind to be derived from the transfer of knowledge in a speedy and effective manner...

    2. Re:When they say 'coding' by alumshubby · · Score: 1

      It's almost enough to make an unhappy US technical writer move to Australia, go on welfare, and begin a second career writing and editing for the Linux Documentation Project.

      Almost.

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    3. Re:When they say 'coding' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS has actually preached about the need for readily available documentation.

  52. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by lilo_booter · · Score: 1

    Like others, I would question your logic here...

    I developed open source for free, got my name known, prove my skills and I'm now getting paid to develop Open Source for money...

    Am I making as much as I did when I was contracting before? Well, I'm not far off... Am I working on stuff that I actually like and would want to use (and more importantly, be able to)? You bet.

    Free distribution does not imply that there's no money involved...

  53. Unemployed and NOT sucking on the gov's teets by OSXexpert · · Score: 0

    Wondering how many techs that are out of work are also self employed as well as having dignity to not collect unemployment even if they have the ability or are self employed.

    --
    --- Old Time NeXThead
    1. Re:Unemployed and NOT sucking on the gov's teets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Where I live (Seattle), unemployment is insurance against the risk of becoming unemployed through no fault of my own. I've already paid for the policy; not making a claim when I'm eligible to isn't "dignified", merely spendthrift.
      • If your self-employment is providing substantial income or taking time away from your search for regular employment, you aren't eligible to make unemployment insurance claims.
  54. Re:American? by Ulven · · Score: 1
    To quote from the GP:

    "While calling someone from Brazil, Panama, or Paraguay "American" would indeed be technically correct, citizens of those and other nations on the North & South American continents (in my personal experience) don't readily refer to themselves as "Americans", and you'd probably get strange looks naming them such."

  55. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>if you judge me by this post, you're an embicile

    An 'embicile'?

    Yes. I see.

  56. you're kidding... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...if you can't get a very well paying job as a programmer in australia at the moment then you must be a technical moron who shouldn't be let anywhere near a computer or open source software. Companies are experiencing a massive skills shortage over here at the moment...the only people this is going to attract are morons that think they can get out of doing manual labour...and that means crap code.

    What a wank

    1. Re:you're kidding... by trawg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I dunno, I think that's a worst case scenario.

      I could see myself between jobs and taking a couple of months in relative relaxation, doing nothing but writing open source software to meet my dole requirement, and then spending the rest of my time doing whatever else it is people on the dole do (drink? relax? whatever).

      Its quite possible that it might lead to great code, because people are coding for run, with no deadlines, no boss looking over their shoulder, no (serious) responsibilities, no fear of your job getting outsourced - maybe if all those pressures are gone, people can chill out and code like never before!

    2. Re:you're kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I'm glad our company isn't in your part of austrlia. We recently advertised for 2 programming positions. We got over 200 applicants in 4 days.

      Were all 200 suitable? No way. But there were more suitable than there were placements, so its definitely not a shortage over here.

    3. Re:you're kidding... by azyuroth · · Score: 1

      Or is it possible you might be unqualified and young, but want to get into the industry?

    4. Re:you're kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Companies are experiencing a massive skills shortage over here at the moment...

      Import American workers. There's certainly a surplus of skilled folks over here already, our corporate overlords keep bringing in even more, and many Americans would accept lower-than-average pay just to get out of the cesspool our country is becoming.

    5. Re:you're kidding... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      He's lying. There aren't any jobs over here.

      Although, if there were, you'd be pleasantly surprised how cheap it is to live in Australia (except for Sydney).

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    6. Re:you're kidding... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      first, if you want to take a couple of months off to work on OSS, fantastic...but do what most people do if they want to take a couple of months off...save up...don't take taxes away from other initiatives (hospitals etc) to support your holiday. And second...do you really think you can survive on the $100/week you would get on the dole after coming from a job that I'm guessing pays anywhere between $1500-$3000 a week (pretax)?

    7. Re:you're kidding... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      piffle...sydney isn't that expensive...I moved down here from Brisbane and the cost of living increase is way less than the pay increase....the only difference is that there's more things to do so you end up spending more.

    8. Re:you're kidding... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      You'd have to offer me about $A100K to move to Sydney. Partly because it's so expensive to live there, but mostly because the only place that sucks more than Sydney is Canberra.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    9. Re:you're kidding... by trawg · · Score: 1

      That's a valid point - but if these people are going to leech off the government anyway, then its better that they're doing _something_, than nothing (interestingly there was an article on one of our (ie, Australia's) low-brow current affairs-type TV shows the other night doing an expose on what some of the dole bludgers are doing - basically just beach bumming and surfing and stuff. There was a great quote from one of them that they showed in the ad, which is all I saw - a guy saying something like "if they think what we do isn't work, they should try and come out surfing with us!")

  57. Mutual Obligation != Community service. by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mutual Obligation (aka work for the dole) is a system where after a certain time on unemployment payments, (note: disability and old age pensions are also "welfare"), the recipient must either, volenteer for a govt approved position or enrol in govt approved education (the govt then counts you as a student so thier unemployment figures look better). If a recipient does not comply then payments are curtailed or cut off. The idea is to give you some basic skills to make you more employable, it is not intended as punishment for being out of work. As far as I know picking up rubbish is NOT an approved activity.

    Community service is a system where a court orders a petty criminal to do something unpleasant, like picking up rubbish from the roadside. The idea is that work is more equitable than fines. If you screw it up the court can inflict further punishment (eg: jail time).

    "Dole bludger" is a derogatory term for someone who recieves unemployment payments, commonly used by self-rightous morons, right-wing politicians and current affairs reporters. All of whom have never had the soul destroying experience of dealing with a Centerlink office.

    Centerlink does not run the work-for-the-dole program it is simply there to fuck up your payments and conduct endless "interviews" where they ask the same questions over and over again (eg: Are you having sex with your flatmate?). The irony of Centerlink is that it keeps thousands of unemployable busy bodies off the dole by giving them the job of handing it out.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Mutual Obligation != Community service. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      As far as the Australian government is concerned, people who are getting out of bed at 6am and going to pick up rubbish are "getting into a job mindset" more than someone who sleeps in till noon before wandering down to Centrelink to use the touch screens. Personally, I think that is true. What I really hated when I was on the dole was that they forced me to do supervised job search in a room with 10 other people and only 2 computers. So rather than being able to sit on seek.com for a couple of hours I only got 10 minutes before the next person wanted a go (and would immediately start looking at the jobs that were advertised identically in the newpaper sitting next to them).

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Mutual Obligation != Community service. by Skt+Haldi · · Score: 1

      So it's not exactly unemployment payments. It's more like an extended period after unemployment is over where they pay you to improve your skills or get involved in a work type environment so that you are more likely to get a job again. I'm trying to think about how as US citizens we'd go about convincing .gov to set up something like this. And shaking my head... it'd never fly. More likely, they'd want to replace unemployment entirely. Although, at least here they don't ask questions about your sex life. Hehe, imagine the lawsuits.

    3. Re:Mutual Obligation != Community service. by Caged · · Score: 1

      True, I've not seen a Mutual Obligation activity where one picks up rubbish from the side of the road, however most activities are of the gardening, weeding and painting gravestones variety. Unless one lives in a capital city of course, where you might get more variety.

      I've only had to do one stint of 'work for the dole' Mutual Obligation, helping with gardening, mowing etc. I can tell you that the participants are pretty much regarded as free labour and are revenue-positive for many setups. The govt gives WftD projects around $1300 to take on attendees for 6 months, each participant being expected to work 15-30 hours a week depending on personal circumstances.

      Incidentally, I volunteered for it alright, I had to pick a work for the dole activity or lose my payments.

    4. Re:Mutual Obligation != Community service. by Homburg · · Score: 1

      "I'm trying to think about how as US citizens we'd go about convincing .gov to set up something like this."

      You have workfare in the US, don't you? It's the same thing.

    5. Re:Mutual Obligation != Community service. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd forgotton about the endless interviews! (I was unemployed ten years ago.)

      I was asked constantly by the department about my relations with my (same gender) flatmate. (We weren't going out.)

      The department even sent out a rep to look around our flat for signs of close cohabitation!

  58. Re:Isn't government work automatically Public Doma by Gantoris · · Score: 1

    no it's not PD, not in AU anyway. For example, the Autralian Taxation Office has TONS of custom software (ie. the cobol stuff that runs the countrys tax system) that is all regarded as "secret" by the organisation.

  59. This wont last long by WildCode · · Score: 1

    This is more a get rich quick sceme by its "mentors". Work for the dole scemes are ment to have positive outcomes which include a % of the participants gaining employment and they are funded by the federal government. I don't see this helping anyone but the people running it. You require the skills and the equipement to be involved, and you do it from home. The mentors only guide you and check the code before they submit it to the appropriate places.

    1. Re:This wont last long by growthfetishist · · Score: 1

      If you take the helicopter up a bit further, even if the mentors are getting some benefit from the government, the overall outcome is the government funding OSS development, and more people being exposed the the OSS community and its approaches. Is this *bad*?

    2. Re:This wont last long by argent · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that you're arguing that there's some kind of magic shield of protection around open source software that prevents you from learning and expanding your skills when you work on it.

  60. Re:the dumbest idea since open sores itself by shitpiles · · Score: 0

    Why not combine their shit together and make cheap software. The only problem with shareware and closed-source is that all these big companys are using jewish accountants and they are being greed jacking up the price 800% over value. Switch them out and you will have cost-effective software worth the money you throw at it.

  61. WTF? by ultrabot · · Score: 1

    So these people are out of work and can possibly implement OSS as a benefit to their community and therefore collect unemployment? Are you kidding me?

    Perhaps if they were employees of a gov program that got cut that would make sense, but why would we start paying those that jumped on the high risk bandwagon 80% of their salary. I know a lot of slashdotters are going to be upset at that, but give me a break! Be compoetetive.

    IT work means a lot of different things to diff people. I'm interested to see how it goes. If I can influence further changes I will.


    You know, you clearly talk english but I don't have an idea what the hell you are talking about. There has to be some meaning, some logic but I just can't find it. Was the text created by ELIZA or other kind of bot? Is this a Turing test?

    --
    Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    1. Re:WTF? by eastshores · · Score: 1

      In a post evening review. I can agree with you. I had some logic and thoughts, but the alcohol last night somehow held them all back and only this came out! =D

    2. Re:WTF? by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      Hah, it happens to everyone of us every now and then :-).

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  62. Re:the dumbest idea since open sores itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell yeah, and if the australian government is already going this far they may as well step in that tiny bit further and control the coding-related jobs, ensuring that no judaism fucks with the process of bringing decent software to those who need it at a cost they can manage.

  63. Unemployed of sound mind and body in AU by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

    have or are willing to learn the skills to work in software development?

  64. opensource by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    opensource and australia .. way to go !!

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  65. Newbie to productive submitter, how to Signpost?. by totierne · · Score: 1

    I am offering http://www.geocities.com/totierne/FreeTuition.html . Aside from the code for dole aspects, how do novice programmers become productive OSS coders. I have 10 years commercial experience, I intend to get newbies started on mini projects and familier with tools (CVS, wiki, mailing lists, python/java/c++) and then get them connected to more established projects, what is the route/jump from newbie to productive submitter, and does the way need to be signposted?

  66. This is bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is bad!

    It degrades the value of programming work AND it degrades the value given on OSS.

    Imagine this....
    Programmers will be analogous to dole bludgers.
    Programming OSS will be analogous to community service work.

    1. Re:This is bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "will be"? Stop living in a dream world, OSS is embarrassing as it is.

      Any self-respecting coder would have already gotten a job at a decent firm like Microsoft or Oracle or something like that.

  67. The Man Behind It by alpha713 · · Score: 0

    I have to say that I know one of the guys (Matt Palmer) behind this project, haven't seen him for ages but he has the know how and passion to see this project through.

    I can't wait to see it in action, a change from the norm thats for sure.

  68. I thought that's just what programmers did.... by Myddrin · · Score: 1, Funny

    Seriously, I've been laid off since Nov. 29th. (I start a new job on Monday...YAY!). But, I've been putting in 40-60 hour days everyday (with the exception of a few days when it was REALLY nice out).

    Not only have a really made progress on GnosisLIMS (which I've been working on for years), but I was also able to create a useful tool for managing my email when I'm way from my desk (Flex-mn).

    It was very useful for answering the standard "so what have you been doing during your time off other than watching TV" interview question.
    --
    Myddrin
    1. Re:I thought that's just what programmers did.... by SComps · · Score: 2, Funny
      But, I've been putting in 40-60 hour days everyday (with the exception of a few days when it was REALLY nice out).
      Wow.. those are some SERIOUSLY long days. -.-
    2. Re:I thought that's just what programmers did.... by Myddrin · · Score: 1

      D'oh...that's what you get for talking the dog for a walk in the middle of posting a comment!

      --
      Myddrin
  69. In OZ, even single young men can get welfare by Cryofan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I do not see why any young American would want to stay in America....Why not invest your future in a country where the wealth is shared more equally? Anyone with a tech or science degree and who is younger than 45 can move there.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:In OZ, even single young men can get welfare by Zapdos · · Score: 1

      This could be just the info we need to make prison reform work. Give the criminals a tech degree and send them to Australia.

    2. Re:In OZ, even single young men can get welfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, shitferbrains, if you had any common sense you would know that they check you for a criminal record.

    3. Re:In OZ, even single young men can get welfare by Zapdos · · Score: 1

      Like that would present a problem. With the one way ticket, we clear the record.

    4. Re:In OZ, even single young men can get welfare by Zapdos · · Score: 1

      You mean they still require one?

    5. Re:In OZ, even single young men can get welfare by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      Is it a difficult or expensive process to become eligible to work in Australia? I'm a Canadian / American / European citizen right now, and my partner and I are currently living in Canada but would like to move a little further away from the US as we don't feel particularly safe living this close to it or in a country where it's very much trying to exert it's influence. Australia would probably be my first choice of country to move to.

      Incidentally, I have a BSc in comp sci, an MSc in comp sci, and soon a PhD in mathematics. My partner has a BSc in biological anthropology, and will likely be getting either an MSc and PhD in the same or a degree in radiology.

      As well, what's the prospects looking like for gay marriage out there? What are the general feelings right now?

      Thanks tons!

    6. Re:In OZ, even single young men can get welfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst Aus is always on the lookout for skilled migrants, because of the principled stand (sarcasm) that the US is taking on issues like human rights and gay marriage, Aus is following suit like a typical brown-nosing sycophant.

  70. Um, except THEY get paid for it by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    You don't see any difference between doing something and getting paid for it, and doing something and NOT getting paid for it.

    You must be living with your parents....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Um, except THEY get paid for it by cahiha · · Score: 1

      You don't see any difference between doing something and getting paid for it, and doing something and NOT getting paid for it.

      They don't get "paid for it", they are getting unemployment benefits, same as in the US.

    2. Re:Um, except THEY get paid for it by Cryofan · · Score: 1

      They DO get paid for doing the work. Part of the deal is that they do some work. RTFA.

      And what this article is talking about is AFTER unemployment benefits run out. THis is longterm. We don't get that here in America. But most countries in W. Europe and in Australia, they do that for their citizens. See the difference between a country run for the benefit of investors and countries run for the benefit of citizens?

      --
      eat shiat and bark at the moon
    3. Re:Um, except THEY get paid for it by kz45 · · Score: 1

      W. Europe and in Australia, they do that for their citizens. See the difference between a country run for the benefit of investors and countries run for the benefit of citizens?

      also look at the taxes in those countries. People that are working regular jobs pay for those OSS progrmamers to continue coding.

  71. good by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    That's pretty damn good. Here in BC (Canada), "income assistance" (as it is called here) is only $510 CDN / month. Plus, you have to be apply for something like 25 jobs each week (and the ministry checks up with the people you applied with to make sure). Etcetera etcetera. Not that these are necessarily bad things -- Canada certainly has its share of welfare slackers. Welfare for the unemployed is SUPPOSED to suck; that's why it's a seperate program from disability assistance and other programs for those unable to work.

    Anyway, people on income assistance usually don't have a lot of free time for hobbies like OSS projects. Between applying for jobs, doing employment programs, and doing whatever casual labour the ministry manages to throw your way, the jobless in BC are actually kept pretty busy.

    1. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get hooked on herion and let the gov support you ;)

  72. I like the thought of this... by behindspace · · Score: 1

    but why can't we have something like this here in the United States? Oh, wait, that's right, Bush is in office...

  73. It is about mentoring - we need you to mentor! by oo_waratah · · Score: 1

    The Mutual obligation component is only a minor requirement and I AM NOT GOING AWAY!

    I am looking towards assisting motivated people working on FOSS. If you think we we tolerate time wasters you are wrong, we are volunteers and we can simply stop providing the Mutual Obligation sign off for the slackers. It is mainly for FOSS developers who would like their time on FOSS acknowledged as mutual obligation under the AU goverment rules.

    If you are fully employed and want help starting. We will help you.

    If you would like more people involved in your project. Offer to be a mentor. We are actively canvassing not worker bees but the queen bees who will help all the worker bees. We need your help!

    What I gain out of this is a better system. If I activate 10 programmers 1/2 as good as me that is 5 me's working on my favourite systems. This is FOSS at it's finest, enable the masses to work on it.

    If there are people who are hardware challenged who need help with hardware we can suggest how to gain access to hardware. You do not need the latest and greatest hardware to contribute. A P100 may be slow but it will work. Programmers with time limits and a pay check may not bother but if you are motivated then you can do amazing things. Who is better to optimise a system someone with a dual 3gig machine or a single P100 at home? Who is more motivated to fix that performance problem.

    Don't think just because you would not work that way that 100's of other do not. I used to take 3 days to compile OpenOffice.org because it was the hardware that I had P350 minum ram. Did I give up?

    Get involved.

    Activate 100s of new programmers.

    Bring new people to FOSS that would not normally consider it.

    Get that port of application X to Windows because you have activated a different sort of hackker. Even port applications to new compilers because they have them.

    I am not going away and this is supported by Linux all over Australia. We have had and encourage world wide participation. We need mentors.

    I SAY AGAIN! We need mentors.

  74. Not really. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    You have to admit that for the last 100 years, ppl who are referred to as "Americans" are known to be from the USA. And it is one of the more common name for us. I do know a number of ppl from Canada, Mexico, Panama, and Brazil who would take it as an insult if you called them an American as they view it as the USA.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Not really. by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      I do know a number of ppl from Canada, Mexico, Panama, and Brazil who would take it as an insult if you called them an American as they view it as the USA

      I've accidentally offended Canadians by using "Americans" to refer to USians exclusively.

      You can say that some Canadians would be offended to be called Americans, and you'd be right, but by the same token, some Canadians are similarly offended if you reserve the continental name for the USA alone.

      I don't think it's cut and dried. Or at least, there is a sufficient sliver of gray to cause the occaisional problem :)

  75. Unemployed + OSS project = Startup by HighOrbit · · Score: 0, Troll

    Or instead of collecting public money and otherwise coding for free, they could take their code and start a business to support it (and themselves).

    I can see the write up in Wired magazine now... "Yeah.. I was on the dole and trying to decide between chicken or beef ramen noodles, but then the IPO came and now I'm trying to decide on which color my yacht will be."

    1. Re:Unemployed + OSS project = Startup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...

      A startup where you work all day on software and you... give it away.

      Sounds like a great buisness plan. There must be millions of startups making billions of dollars by now with that plan!

      Oh wait...

  76. Use it to start a company. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    a small group of coders could develop GPL code and then offer support. Some ideas would be tax calculation software or a core library for educational software (handling testing, AI, etc).

    This is very similar to what I was trying to get my state to do (the response from the state gov. was most interesting)

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Use it to start a company. by BumbaCLot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, nice response, did they sign it
      Yours truly,
      The State?

    2. Re:Use it to start a company. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Did they sign what? The state was Colorado.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  77. Sure this is good? by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure this is the best thing. I mean its good to have people working on OSS projects, but I think part of what made OSS projects so good was that the people who wrote them really wanted to write them, and make sure they were good. If we have a whole country full of unemployed programmers writing OSS code because they have to (to receive welfare) then that motivation has changed considerably.

    I tend to do something much better when I want to rather than when I have to. Math is a perfect example. I hated calculus, not because it was hard, but because it was tedious. I loved vector math because I used that to do OpenGL programming and made some really cool interactive scenes. Result: a better grade in graphics (vector math) than in calculus.

    Motivation is a powerful thing, and hopefully the quality of the work they do isn't undermined by their desire (or need) for money.

    1. Re:Sure this is good? by terrywc · · Score: 1

      Yes. The people who participate in this project do so because they want to. They are not forced to do so.

      In fact, anyone who attempts to use it as an easy bludge off would find their mentor pissed off and lose them, thus losing their formal reporting structure, which could result in them being "breached" and losing income for 18 weeks.

  78. better than the soviet america program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In soviet america, it seems that anyone who meets the barest of requirements qualifies for social programs aimed at giving them money for no work. How often are these recipients given an ultimatum, "work or you won't get a check"; or "You will receive this for six months. If you don't have a job by then, tough," ????

    Really, having requirements is a good thing, and proving this type of option is great, I think, for programmer types that wouldn't survive working at McDonalds.

  79. Yes, All for the Unemployed by bigbinc · · Score: 0

    I am unemployed, I am working/testing different projects. Give me money. Hehe. That is awesome. Will program for food.

    --
    ---- Berlin Brown http://www.newspiritcompany.
  80. CC is NOT work for dole by oo_waratah · · Score: 1

    This is a mutual obligation where you volunteer to help the community.

    We are also mentors to get others started on FOSS development.

    Work for the dole is complicated to set up and requires to much paperwork to be effective. We would also be assign all sorts of people. We only work with people who volunteer to work with us.

  81. Won't work for married men by HomerJayS · · Score: 1
    I for one know that if a married man was developing software for "free" almost all day, the Nag-O-Meter would be off the scale.

    The chorus of "How come you can't get off your lazy butt and get a paying job to do that!" would be deafening.

  82. New starters getting the first job by oo_waratah · · Score: 1

    There are a number of reasons that people are not employed. It took me 7 years to get my first serious computer job. I had the skills but no business application. FOSS now gives you this, want a reference from an experienced programmer, work with me and I can give you one.

    If you are over 40 and out of work then there is a 'young industry' problem. People who are that old are obviously not useful, let's hire a young grad they are cheaper. You will take the same? Why you are more qualified than that, must be something wrong with you.

    Employment is not always as balck and white as people paint it.

    Note I am fully employed and have been for 20 years. I am just fully aware of the situation for other people. I am also aware that I am 40 and this is a glass ceiling for our industry.

    1. Re:New starters getting the first job by DrCode · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I've done extensive OSS work (Exult), and have been a software developer for a looong time - unfortunately, too long, since I'm way over 40. A few years ago when I was unemployed, I only received 2 interviews over a 5-month period when I was applying for about 20 jobs/week. And those interviews were for the company that hired me (and where I'm still working).

      Working on open-source is fun, and I still do it; but I'm no longer under any illusions that it will help much with my career. But, your networking suggestion can't be emphasized enough. It is the way to get a job (and the only reason I got the chance for my current position).

  83. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by syousef · · Score: 1

    If you're some guy whose only motivation is to make good money, good luck chump.

    Obviously you're payed for your social skills.

    Never said I was in it JUST for the money. I said if you give something away for free you tend to devalue it.

    I'm as sick of all this socialist BS as I am of captialist IP law crud. Why oh why is there no happy medium? Either you have to give everything away for free and make sure anyone could take over the work and put you out of a job, or you have to make money your only goal. BS. Utter BS.

    A model where people out of work do work for nothing is not sustainable. Do you think you're going to get to pick what you do when your social security cheque is tied to it? All of a sudden, people are willing to do hard work for peanuts and you're not making much more than the poor bastard in India that has to call himself Russel so that he can take your freaking support calls for your piece of shit laptop.

    Do you honestly think that because you're good enough and fortunate enough to have the opportunity to move to something you actually enjoy that every person out there can do similar. Watch office space and listen to the line about what you'd do if you had a million dollars. "If everyone did what they wanted no body would be out there to pick up shit".

    Why does this opinion make me a troll? Why on earth are you attacking me you saddistic narrow minded fool? How do you know why I'm in IT? How dare you get so personal as to claim to know my mind. If I insist on being paid for my hard work, why does that mean it's my only motivation for doing the work? No. It's a strong motiviation and an important one. Last time I checked you need money to live and more money to prosper. You wouldn't be writing crap like this if you couldn't afford net access and a machine. No one's going to pay for your kid's education or that life saving operation one of them needs just because you're some sort of philanthropist.

    Slashdot has gotten so that every narrow minded loser teenage sheep and burnt out has-been jaded social misfit shouts down an idea without even considering it. If you don't tow the slashdot party line be prepared to be called a troll. This place disgusts me sometimes.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  84. Looks good on your resume by wackysootroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're involved in a couple of high profile Open source projects it looks good on your resume.

    The person responsible for hiring you can see exactly how well you code, which along with making a good impression in your interview will convince that person that you know what you are doing.

    Think about this also, if you need to hire someone good, what sets them apart from the crowd? Certs? No. H1B? No. This person worked on the linux kerenel? Wow, call him in for an interview, now.

  85. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by syousef · · Score: 1

    Because they (the bosses) can see the quality of the work you've done for another project, so then they can pay you to do their project.

    A small number of well known people perhaps get these opportunities. No one I've worked with got their job through doing open source work. I've worked at large and small consultancies, banks and building societies. A large number of the opportunities in this country (Australia) are in these areas.

    For the record I've released small snippets of stuff myself. I will not go about coding a whole project for no pay. Most people who do this either burn out in a handful of years or find someone to sponsor and pay for their work. Otherwise, unless you're well off to begin with, you're insane.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  86. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by syousef · · Score: 0

    Please read my reply to parent, and other replies.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  87. Re:after the big flash, many will be 'unemployed' by dooleys · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Have you been forgetting to take your medication again?

  88. How many IBM Programmers are in Australia? by lcsjk · · Score: 2, Funny

    You could soon have an abundance of programmers to work on OSS.

  89. Get more ideas here by vivekg · · Score: 1
    --
    The important thing is not to stop questioning --Albert Einstein.
  90. Not everybody's a programmer by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    Not everyone is a programmer, those roles will be filled, in case you were nervous about it.

  91. It helps to keep your sanity by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was unemployed, working on OSS projects gave me a purpose. After spending hours a day for nine months and slipping into depression, OSS gave me a new purpose, and a hope. I was keeping my skills sharp. I was contributing to the community. I had a reason to get up in the morning. OSS kept me sane when I thought I was going to go nuts.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
  92. Communist Saturdays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia we used to call that Communist Saturdays. You basically worked on Saturday for no compensation. Of course you had the cozy feeling that you are "building" the country.

  93. Impressed with the law by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    I'm probably naive, not living there to see the problems, but I am impressed with the welfare law. As a conservative, I prefer private charity, but the Mutual Obligation feature of AU state charity sounds like it captures the true spirit of constructive charity (as opposed to tying dole payments to the number of illegitimate children like we did here in the states until recently). When providing private charity to an individual, that is exactly the expectation I have. It also reflects the successful stories of private charity passed down from the Great Depression.

  94. Slow News Day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Unemployed working on OSS projects"??? Come on... If they were employed, they'd be working on Windows.

  95. I think that it's about the same now, with by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1
    exchange rates being what they are.

    Unless you live in Manhattan. Everything you buy in either country is made by the same Chinese guy. You notice petrol though - it's much cheaper in the Sates, but then the call it 'Gas'.

    I guess they probably call gas 'plasma'.

    1. Re:I think that it's about the same now, with by strider44 · · Score: 1

      not stuff like food and shelter, which is what would take up the majority of the money.

  96. must apply fro a job each day in my state by peter303 · · Score: 1

    In Colorado to collect unemployment you have to show that you applied for ten jobs in a two week period. Usually you just hand in a list of email addresses you mailed a resume to

    1. Re:must apply fro a job each day in my state by terrywc · · Score: 1

      In Australia, it can be from 4 (minimum) to 10 (normal maximum. If you are on the 10/fortnight level, you generally have a detailed booklet to fill in. What is really funny, on the fortnightly form, and all the example doco, it asks for Name, Contact telephone number and Job type. Seems the government is still to come to grips with the Internet age.

  97. Good Grief!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only on slashdot with OSS supporters would we think anything a wellfare state does is good!

    Evil Man

  98. RTP, NC has a private version of this, sorta by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Certain once-large organizations have shed a lot of (and will soon shed all ) folks around here, and others are threatening to do the same. Not surprising, since RTP has been so telecom-centric, and unlike Silicon Valley, concentrates its employment base in a handful of large companies (vs. gajillions of startups).

    The upshot is that there are a lot of unemployed techies around here who need re-training. Enter TechEngage. The proposition is simple: if you're unemployed, you get to attend a certain number of classes for free (or close to it), and in return, you donate 40 hours of your time to the cause.

    I really wish the public sector would wake up to this effort. Oh, sorry, that would be socialist. Can't have that. Unless of course you're an unemployed textile worker in the western part of NC, without even a high-school diploma. Then our state legislature bends over for you, even though you could never contribute as much to the tax base once employed (grumble)..

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
  99. State sponsored OSS? by d_jedi · · Score: 1

    Remember, kids.. when you're programming OSS.. you're programming COMMUNISM.

    Just imagine how many of these coders would have real, paying jobs if markets where OSS has taken over were open to proprietary products..
    (before the trolls come in.. what I mean is markets are essentially closed to proprietary software - IE those markets would be unprofitable - because of free alternatives.. unless you're Microsoft, you can't really compete with free.. )

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  100. How long does Australian unemployment last? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    In the US it varies by state, and in Minnesota it was for six months.

    There used to be a 3-month federal extension, but to my knowledge it hasn't been renewed.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    1. Re:How long does Australian unemployment last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no time limit as long as one fulfills certain obligations. Generally from what I know, as long as you keep looking for work and/or doing training/work-for-the-dole/education the dole payments continue. There are the "long term unemployed", some who have been collecting dole payments continually for over a decade by fulfilling the obligations.

  101. I'll hire you by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Hiring at US$7.50/hr to do helpdesk support for Windows for old ladies with their dialup Internet. Must have 10 years of experience with Windows XP, IIS, Dell servers, and know how to fix our fucked-up Exchange server. Must be able to communicate the most absolutely complex and detailed computing concepts to people who don't care, and just want their email to work. Must have prior IT and management experience, even though you'll be the only one in the building that does any work at all. Must be familiar with different sized pieces of paper, and not get freaked out by them, printed or not. Please reply with a cover letter, resume in WORD format, salary requirements, and how soon you'll move to some ass place that nobody's ever heard of.

    Fuck That Job Dotcom
    recruiter-rater

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:I'll hire you by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      For fixing the Exchange server, would I have to provide my own chainsaw? Exchange is a brilliant idea, very poorly executed.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  102. It's getting to the interview part that's hard. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Most job hunters (at least in the US) are finding themselves excluded well before being contacted by an actual human.

    Companies seem to be looking for exact matches, and explicit experience in both a specific tech and a specific line of business is often a hard requirement before they'll even consider talking to you.

    (This is based on my recent 32-month-long unemployment stint in the Minneapolis area as well as lengthy conversations with many others who were [or still are] in the same situation).

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    1. Re:It's getting to the interview part that's hard. by DrCode · · Score: 1

      No kidding. This sort of thing really ticks me off, too, as I know that anyone who's a decent software writer can pick up anything in a matter of weeks, if not days. A few years ago, I recall seeing requirements that were not just for Java, but for specific versions of Java and Swing.

  103. For most OSS, any developer is an asset by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    Most open source projects are being damaged from lack of development. Most of sourceforge is dead projects.

    Most open source projects would benefit from any development, even bad development would attract attention - which would mean QA-ing and fixing the bad code and attracting good coders to the project. People ignore projects (on sourceforge and elsewhere) where nothing is happening. No one wants to be the only coder or one of a very few on a project apparently no one cares enough about to support or to recruit programmers for.

    If an open source project is viable enough where new code could actually do more harm than good (i.e. it is viable enough to be harm-able) then it has enough safeguards against bad code harming the project that it isn't too big a concern. Bad code doesn't get into Linux (unless it is from one of the big names on the project - but that is the subject of another post - and I don't want a Flamebait mod on this one. ;)

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  104. How about university papers publish via wikipedia? by gwait · · Score: 1

    Open collaboration so obviously wins!

    --
    Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
  105. This proves that OSS isn't Communist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because the political leaders have assured us there is no one more patriotic than the mega corporations who are laying of local citizens in droves. Why? Because they are the true embodiment of the capitalist dream!

    So all the reams of skilled people who are no longer employed should feel *proud* that they are part of that dream! You are the wind beneath our wings! And if this results in OSS then only a communist would fight OSS.

    Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Mr. Gates!

  106. QA by kidphoton · · Score: 1

    In a related story: Perth Zoo has announced the grand opening of it's new OSS Development Center. Based in the Primate House, the Center will...

  107. I've done it by beware1000 · · Score: 1

    I personally am unemployed. I'm 21 and was picked up as a programmer as soon as I left school. I worked in the same job for afew years and the company ended up going down the plug. So now I am left without qualifications (admittedly I should have studied a course while working but hindsight is 20-20) and am now waiting for uni enrolments to start again. However for 6 months I worked on F/OSS software for non profit organisations and loved it, I am going back to volunteer. It was 3 days a week 7-8 hours a day and lead a project working on a small scalable linux distribution (trinix based) and a set of low level tools to make things run that bit better on lower end machines. This is what I would have done whilst sitting at home, except recognised on a wider scale whilst giving me some stuff for my resume. It's a good arrangement IMO.

  108. Will code for food by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    Looks like OZ is taking this old joke literally.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  109. The Ultimate Resume by virtigex · · Score: 1

    This is a fantastic idea for software engineers. Employers want to know what your work is like. Usually people work proprietary code which is not available to prospective employers and they just have to take your word for it. Working on an open source project means that your prospective employer can download the code, compile it, run it and see how you did it. They can get a 100% accurate idea of what you are capable of. I've looked for work two times in previous years and both times I've pointed my prospective employer at open source code that I've written. Both times I have done this with clued-in employers (the ones that you would like to work for) I've had a job offer within a week. Open Source code rocks!

  110. OSS just got a little MORE communist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's now welfare supported!

    Man that is a funny :)

  111. Are you high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This actually MAKES OSS communist!

    It is now paid for by welfare!!!!!

  112. Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have "In Korea, old men...", "in Soviet Rusia the * * you", now we're going to begin hearing "In Australia" jokes.

  113. I'm just coming down now but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought bending over for the soul-less mega corporations was our public duty. If they decide to can our jobs it only follows that being unemployed is an act of patriotism.

  114. Contamination? by Jon_Hanson · · Score: 1

    What about contamination? Some employers may not look favoribly on your open-source work becaus they will be worried about GPL code showing up in their products (either intentionally or unintentionally).

    I know that when I was going to get source access to some Microsoft code I had to agree to not even look at any open-source code whether it was related to the Microsoft code or not.

  115. OSS is Socialist, NOT communist. by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    not that it really matters. --- "you can hang from the right or the left, I don't care, justs top swingin' from my nuts"

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  116. Good idea on top of a bad idea (welfare)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just get rid of the welfare part.

  117. This Is Not Going To Help by $criptah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In corporate America it is not going to help.

    So, you are unemployed looking for a job. That is bad. Now you want to do something with OSS. You polish your skills, come up with something new while hoping that you'll get a job. What you don't understand that you're still nobody in a corporate world. You have better skills, but, guess what, the rest of the world will acquire those skills as well. If you're not willing to work for less, then you'll be replaced again. Go start working on another OSS project. Software engineers are quite common these days. Corporations will outsource and find workers willing to work for the lowest possible wage. As one CEO said, "...The problem with Asia is not the price, it's the fact that they [Indians, Chinese] can't work for free."

    You can study and do whatever you want; however, as soon as there is somebody else who is willing to do the same for less money, you're out. Nobody gives a flying fuck if you are an OSS contributor or a genius if you don't fit the price tag. One of my friends is desperately looking for development gigs online. He found himself competing with Indians who are willing to work for less than $10/hr. Unless he lowers his price, he can't really work.

    The sooner you realize your pathetic state, the better off you'll be. Instead of doing something that the rest of the world can do, try something new. Whatever you do, make sure that you have skills that are not related to IT. That will increase your chance of survival.

    1. Re:This Is Not Going To Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phoey,

      That's really something: calling all those in the western world currently unemployed "pathetic".

      Out-sourcing and off-shoring are all the rage right now. Do you remember what the rage was 5 (five) years ago? I believe it had something to do with e-commerce. When was the last time you read something about that?

      Do you know how hard it is to write consicive documents in a language that is not your own? Forget that, do you know how hard it is to get decicive documents? (So, if we build what you ask now, you promise to be happy about it after we have build it?)

      It's all the rage now, to go to the east.
      But wait: all production already went east about 10 years ago, didn't it? And what do I hear now: production costs in the Netherlands are only 4% higher then in China. Is that enough to counter the cost of moving?

      Smart companies nowadays find that it is not.
      Outsourcing and off-shoring is only the current hype.
      No more, no less.

      David

    2. Re:This Is Not Going To Help by $criptah · · Score: 1

      I remember the rage five years ago. I know what it is like when it comes to reading foreign documentation. Let me put it this way, everything I have been doing in the past two years was related to foreign development. Translating technical documentation, getting in touch with remote R&D and banging my head against the wall is still a part of my daily routine.

      Please note, I did not mean to offend anybody by sayig "pathetic." I pity the people who are still trying to hang on onto their old skills and who do not want to explore future possibilities. I know plenty of folks who try to compete with third world workers on coding project and, guess what, they're losing big time.

      The point of my post was that doing OSS stuff is not going to help you out in a long run. At least not everybody who does it will benefit directly from it. Do development because you like it, not because you want to look good in the eyes of your employer. Do you get it now? Outsourcing is never going to go away. Get used to it. Don't believe me? Take a look at what cars Americans are driving today. If you still think that creating yet another stupid fucking application that never works is going to benefit you, you're on a wrong track. The only way to stay in business is to contribute to the business cycle directly. Add value to a product and service and you'll be able to survive. Take it from somebody who works for a software shop where 80% of all development is done outside the U.S. My office employs business folks who customize the imported software to customer's business requirements. Knowing technology definitely helps, but we tend to like people who can put a money making spin on every deal, not nerds who make cool things because they can.

    3. Re:This Is Not Going To Help by Sandlin · · Score: 1

      He's right, it's not going to help. Outsourcing is not going to stop, and the tech jobs are NOT coming back to either the US or Australia. They're gone.
      The cars now driven in America are foreign, and the once "Capital of the Car World", Michigan, is bleeding car manufacturing jobs. Most of us realize that these jobs are not coming back. Amazingly, Michigan, is trying to retrain the unemployed car manufacturing workers for high-tech jobs!! Those jobs have been and will continue to be outsourced! What are they thinking about? $scriptah is right when he says to contribute to the business cycle directly.
      There is an alternative: Move to India or China. The way we in the US are giving away our industrial base to China, we're soon be speaking Chinese anyways.

  118. Better than our system which punishes by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

    Go to school while unemployed here (USA) is viewed as not looking for a job.
    So much for improving your chances of being productive...

  119. Sometimes jobs appear by accident. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Yes, some people can pick things up quite quickly.

    A case in point: The only work I was able to get (in roughly the middle of my unemployment) was on a platform I'd never even seen before (Unisys A-series mainframe box), but the site was 50-60 miles from the Twin Cities, and the fact that I knew COBOL relatively well on another platform was enough for them to hire me.

    That whole situation was an accident, though. I was told by the contracting firm that the client wanted a Unisys 2200 programmer, and as far as I could tell (after the fact) the client was told that I was an A-series programmer.

    It was only during the interview that it became apparent that the hiring manager and I were talking completely two different languages when it came to the mainframe environment (A-series boxes use Burroughs MCP, which is VERY different from the OS2200 environment that 2200 boxes use), but on a whim he let me talk to the lead programmer, and it became apparent from looking at the actual code (COBOL 74) that the learning curve wouldn't be very steep.

    I was writing code within 3-4 hours of being on site for the first time. COBOL is COBOL even if I dislike the language, and while DMSII was different from SQL or DMS1100, it was similar enough that it didn't take much time to learn enough to be useful.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  120. Not a new idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a new idea, this company has run a program called LinuXceed since 2002. They sponsored working on open source projects, provided me with a reference and six months later I was working in the datacenter of a major ISP.

    These folks will talk with you, see what your career goals are, and suggest open source projects, or new ones that will help you get there. Its all free. Its company sponsored so it carries more weight with potential employers etc.

    http://www.splicednetworks.com/company/linuxceed.h tml

  121. That's economics for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is economics an exact science?

    People manage to do nifty mathematical things in economics research, and that may give the impression that the discipline does involve concrete facts. But economics is more of a soft science--famous for the way any two economists will tend to hold at least three incompatible opinions about any given problem.

    That's what is going on here. Every dollar not spent on licenses by a firm is a dollar they can use to hire somebody directly. On the other hand, it is also a dollar not given to a software firm, who then *cannot* pay that dollar to a coder. Is this progress or regress for an economy? And is it progress or regress for a society [which is what we call it, when we are talking about quality of life and not just dollar-flows]?

    It's hard to clearly resolve that question one way or the other. The Intellectual Property debate involves exactly the same quandary: The laws that are being pushed do compel people to spend more, increasing the "velocity of money" that makes national GNP statistics look so good. On the other hand, the processes involved are clearly working to concentrate wealth in the hands of a few "winners" who hoard it and do precious nothing to benefit society as a whole.

    Those who are disenfranchised by these dollar games are left with precious little access to knowledge or materials to better themselves--and that is precisely why public-access things like libraries and public schooling and this unemployed programmers' guild are good ideas. They let people get around some of the societal distortions caused by government and big-business policy's overemphasis on dollar-denominated measures of value.

    I for one welcome any new non-econocentric movements in public policy.

  122. You've got a point! by flibberdi · · Score: 1

    Ok, now I should say something about Gimps/GTKs stability on windows, and it not really being an alternative (on that platform, on Linux/UNIX PS is nop), HOWEVER I don't use Windows (only use that for "special" development) so I can't really say that (besides, I don't wear an asbestos suit), I could only give you hersay about the stability/usabilty....but You probably know more about that than I do.

    I could give you another example though!!

    BIBBLE!!

    It really kicks a**!!

    It's expensive ($69 for Linux), but I *think* they are selling licenses enough to cover their expenses. The alternative (on Linux) should be UFRaw.

    On windows there are free as in beer alternatives but bibblelabs seem to survive anyhow...

  123. Is it really? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Sure it is good that people can spend their time doing OSS work, but is this really good for OSS?

    I don't know what the Oz job market is like, but if you can't get a job, then why? Surely the best programmers have no problems finding a job. Does this mean that the average quality of OSS programming will decline?

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  124. Why don't goverments just treat us like farmers? by wflynn · · Score: 1

    They should treat software engineers like farmers. Which in the EU, have for years been paid to produce products no one wanted..... so come on intervention software.... And if we start to produce to much of the code.... they could always pay us to set-a-side our old machines and get paid if we promise not to plug them in......... So lets campaing for grants, which we can farm....

  125. In regards Oz welfare by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    If one has been on the dole so long that one has developed a mental disorder &/or become a drug addict, one can then get about AU$600 (I s'pose about US$470) a fortnight on the Oz disability pension, including rental assistence, the pharmacuetical benefit & the pensioner education supplement.

    The dole is a little less than a straight pension without the added rental assistence, the pharmacuetical pension or the PES ontop.

  126. well... by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    They might live in bloody Cambelltown, Maquarie Fields or Bidwell & have a phobia about trains.

  127. I just had this visual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of a pickup truck pulling up onto this dirt field populated by raggedy clothed blodgers. Guy gets out of the pickup truck, and hollers: I need some coders! Some Linux guys!

    A bunch of hands come up!

    "Ok! You! You! You! You!" (until he leaves about five) "5 bucks an hour and some soup! Get in the back!" (They board the pickup.)

    "I need some WIndows guys too!"

    Other fewer hands reluctantly come up.

    To the ones that didn't raise their hands, he says, "Here's two bux apiece for each of you if you beat those guys up!" At which point they commence pummeling those guys.

  128. Better yet by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    blow your dole payments using those fits for long enough & you'll be able to claim the disability pension.

  129. Actually just a soundbite by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    To attract votes from those that listen to Allan Jones, John Laws & Stan what-his-name.

  130. Sydney!=Australia by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Maybe you're assuming the coding vacancies:available coders ratio in the rest of Oz is the same as it is in Sydney?

    1. Re:Sydney!=Australia by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      or assuming that if a programmer can't get a job in brisbane and can walk into a $80k/year job in sydney he/she'd move!

  131. Code not good enough to get a real job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Code not good enough to get a real job - so let's put that code into open source projects. Great idea!

  132. It's a defacto thing by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    If one's not working but one's defacto partner is working, then the official line is that one then becomes a dependent/tax deduction for the working half.

    Here in Oz welfare is only officially for singles or for both partners combined in a relationship. Meaning those in relationships are excluded from welfare automatically unless their partner also qualifies for welfare too.

    Thus Centrelink's always on the hunt to trackdown clients that it suspects are a bit to lubbydubby with their 'flat mates'

    1. Re:It's a defacto thing by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I'm no admin guru but names, adresses, "dependent/tax deductions", and "welfare payments" are all electronically recorded on tax assesments.

      Thus I suspect Centerlink are asking questions for thier own entertainment.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  133. Re:OSS work like you work for IBM but without the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never said I was in it JUST for the money

    That portion of the reply was meant in general, not personally. Had you took it in the entire context, provided your reading comprehension skills afford you that ability, you'd have seen it.

    As for the rest of your reply, oh well. The point was, OSS projects have paid off for me and helped me change careers. I didn't mod you down, but I suspect you got modded down because what you said doesn't match reality of what others have experienced. GOOD work on OSS projects are as valid to a potential employer as any other good work.

  134. Great minds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...think alike. At least, that's what I heard.

    For some months now, I and some others have been busy trying to set up a local organisation where (temporarily) unemployed IT-personel can keep up to date by contributing to OS-projects.
    Situated in the the north of the Netherlands, just about the longest distance you can get from .au!

    We go one step further though: we want to create a work-like enviorment where volunteers can participate in projects (as in: the staff decides the project, you and max. 9 others do the project at agreed times and at a provided work-location, just like paid work). These projects are Open Source, and can vary from translating help-files to creating a tracking-system for field-mice. (Why field-mice? Because if you can track those, you can track anything: from trucks to railroad-cars. And companies who need tracking will know where to go. As will those who want to implement Open Office in dutch.)

    We're just building up. The first, cautious official support is just about coming (We were invited to present ourselves at the isb2005)
    Long way to go yet, but by the end of this summer, we'll either be running or burning

    David

    P.S.
    To CommunityCode, I'll try to contact you after next week.

  135. Thanks /. -- you made my day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an Australian, I can't see the government allowing this sort of thing to take off, but I give the project an A+ for creativity and originality. Coding for OSS for work for the dole.

    That made my day.

  136. Isn't that the Slashdot tagline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is, isn't it -- there are more out of work armchair generals on this site than anywhere else. Guaranteed.

  137. phpPgAdmin by grikdog · · Score: 1

    Australia? United States? Cyberspace is the size of a pinhead, and as long as the angels dancing on it finish bringing phpPgAdmin to the same state of perfection as phpMyAdmin SOMETIME SOON, I'll be happy.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  138. Documentation and bug triage welcome by oo_waratah · · Score: 1

    All volunteers that want to learn are welcome. If you would like to review the latest OOo documentation on OOo authors then that would meet the criteria without a problem.

    I would actually like to cativate more documentors than programmers. This is where we can really excel.

  139. The Metric System by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    The metric system is taught in schools, but it is not used. Ever.

    Silly wacky arbitrary English measurements are just wrong, and impossible to remember. I'd rather be empowered by ease-of-use, than hindered by needless obfuscation.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.