Slashdot Mirror


Google to Release Firefox Toolbar

daria42 writes "Google is about to release a Firefox version of its toolbar, according to an e-mail sent to developers of the open source GoogleBar project. The e-mail claims to have been sent by Google engineer Fritz Schneider and is dated 1 July. "It has pretty much the same features as the latest IE toolbar except of course for things like the popup blocker," the e-mail said (Pop-up blocking is an in-built feature of Firefox)."

348 comments

  1. FirefoogleBar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I surprised they didn't name it "GooBar."

    1. Re:FirefoogleBar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or the firebar
      or the firebard
      or.. ha, better get to bed.

    2. Re:FirefoogleBar by flatface · · Score: 3, Funny

      Firebargle.

    3. Re:FirefoogleBar by njko · · Score: 4, Funny

      Foobar?

      --
      \n.\n
    4. Re:FirefoogleBar by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Already taken by an audio player.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    5. Re:FirefoogleBar by biggy97 · · Score: 1

      Why didn't google create the toolbar earlier. Wait, i know! Firefox wasn't soo importnat then...

    6. Re:FirefoogleBar by Leeesher · · Score: 1

      GooFirglear!

  2. feeling lucky by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 1, Funny

    arent we all feeling lucky?

    1. Re:feeling lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this offtopic? It's a direct reference to google's 'I'm feeling lucky' button ... sheesh

    2. Re:feeling lucky by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 2

      a) It doesn't really seem that direct. b) hardly anyone uses the "i'm feeling lucky button anymore"

    3. Re:feeling lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Is this based on your years of statistical research on the subject? Or are you just pulling that out of your arse?

    4. Re:feeling lucky by Goronmon · · Score: 1

      Where do you think most people get their numbers on slashdot? ;)

    5. Re:feeling lucky by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      Funny that, every time I type something other than a URL in the FireFox address bar I use the 'I'm feeling Lucky' feature. In fact, I use it probably upwards to 20 times a day, easy. That's like saying no-one reads /. anymore... (Well, we all know the editors don't, hence the dupes, but....)

    6. Re:feeling lucky by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's like saying no one reads /. anymore. I think it's more like saying no one uses ask.com
      Sure there are people that use it, and it's fairly likely that they'll come out of the woodwork over this, but it's similarly true

    7. Re:feeling lucky by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Every time I want to go to yahoo, wikipedia, or other easily recognizable site that I dont happen to have on my bookmarks, I use the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

      So I end up using it daily, once or twice.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    8. Re:feeling lucky by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      So why would I want to use google's toolbar (that is closed source and does who knows what) as opposed to the FOSS Googlebar that I've been using for months?

      This was a big stumbling point for me in switching to firefox, that I wouldn't have my google toolbar. Once I found out aboot the Googlebar, I've never looked back.

      I think I'll stick w/FOSS for now. I can't see any advantage to using the "official" one really... unless I want to have my browsing recorded for pagerank or whatever...

      --

      Place sig here.
  3. Linux 8.0?!? by nokilli · · Score: 5, Funny

    As per the email Google sent the GoogleBar guys.

    I knew being a Gentoo user would subject me to some delays while waiting for everything to compile, but this is ridiculous! 8.0!?! I'm still running 2.6.10!

    1. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, there goes the theory that you need to be a genius to work at Google. They seem to hire idiots (by old-boy network) just like all other companies.

      Seriously, WTF is Linux 8.0? I bet even MS employees know that there is no such thing.

    2. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by X0563511 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Maybe they meant 2.8.X?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by h2d2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It might be a reference to Red Hat 8.0...

      (may be!)
      --
      Mozilla stole tabs from NetCaptor. So what? Right?
    4. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Obviously he meant RedHat.

      I don't see what your problem is. RedHat employs most of the top kernel contributors anyway so they effectively own & steer Linux's development.

    5. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by mark_hill97 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We all know that means Red Hat 8.0+. Quit complaining, not everyone knows that much about linux.

    6. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some guy names Linus disagrees, but what does he know.

    7. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't he some foreigner? Probably a terrorist too...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    8. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We got it, Gentoo ricer. Can you STFU now?

    9. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

      or SuSE...

      One of my pet peeves:

      "I have a problem with my Linux"
      "Yes? What's up?"
      "I'm running Linux 9.3 ... yadda yadda yadda"

    10. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps he unders"tood that when he said "effectively". Not "officially", "effectively".

    11. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by mark_hill97 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The AC is an idiot. Gentoo is for people who like thier system up to date, not just ricers. however Red Hat is aimed at buisnesses and is the most well established name in linux distros, especially for businesses.

    12. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by pembo13 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gentoo or not, you should be embarrased to not know this.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    13. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe people don't know what this Linux thingie is. You should have added detailed description what Linux really is.

      Quick example how it should be done:
      the e-mail said (Pop-up blocking is an in-built feature of Firefox)."

    14. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by nokilli · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In my way of thinking, you should be embarrassed to be running Red Hat.

      Use rpm? I'd rather run Windows.

    15. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pathetic.

    16. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by strabo · · Score: 3, Funny
      We all know that means Red Hat 8.0+. Quit complaining, not everyone knows that much about linux.

      Well, crap! I guess we have a long wait then, since the current version of Red Hat's operating system ... you know, "The corporate Linux standard" ... is only version 4.

      </sarcasm>
    17. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We all know that means Red Hat 8.0+. Quit complaining, not everyone knows that much about linux.

      Exactly, you really can't start harassing new people due to the spaghetti versioning system that Linux and it's associated distros all have. Redhat 9, Redhat Fedora Core 4, Debian 3, Linux 2.4, Linux 2.6, Gnome 2, KDE 3. And to guaruntee any sort of compatibility or help, you need to know exactly what you're running.

      I would have expected more from a Google employee to be honest, but maybe he worded it that way for all the laymen.

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    18. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by iabervon · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's just the kernel. You have to add the version numbers for the kernel, glibc, gcc, and firefox to get the Linux version. I'm at 8.12.16.1, for example, which seems to be sufficient.

    19. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "From my point of view, the Jedi are evil!"
      Stop Whining, Emo Boy.

    20. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Mehtuus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously he meant RedHat.

      Then he should have said RedHat...

      --
      http://mehtuus.googlepages.com
    21. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by BuhSnarf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whilst I agree that seems like a stupid mistake to make. Why not just put "Linux with Firefox 1.0.4" as that would surely have all the right software? But I think this shows one of the underlying problems of why it's hard to release anything to the Linux community. I use Linux (both Ubuntu and SuSE) which again have completely different version numbers ubuntu's 5.04 is much better than SuSE's v5 (if they had one!) So how are people supposed to release system requirements? Should they list each distro and it's version numbers, should they list each dependency and it's version number? Do many people actually know what version of glibc they have without looking? Or in fact which kernel? I don't. I think until people can release software that just works for Linux. i.e. you can get it from download.com or from the authors page and you just run an installer and it's all setup icons and all. Whilst I like repos the problem is is that you have to wait for people to build a package for your distro and upload it before you can install it. This can be weeks later than when the actual product was released and sometimes they contain bugfixes that we want now. For example Kopete's MSN connectivity problems. Before you say, well compile it and it'll be for your machine. I hate compiling, it's complicated and seems a awkard way of doing something. And many people are like that, especially my girlfriend who uses SuSE, she just wants to click in Yast and have the program ready.

    22. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      1 t0t411y 4gr33!!!!11!1!1 0mg rpmz r 4 t3h l00z3rz!1!1!

    23. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot fucking on. Red Hat is the worst Linux distro I have used. It has no strengths whatsoever, and there's always a better distro for the job. Most of us here started Linux on Red Hat because we didn't know any better, and moved on to a better distro soon after.

      I see you've upset a few Red Hat users too. Don't worry, eventually they'll start using a decent distro.

    24. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by frp001 · · Score: 1

      Parent comment is ridiculous.
      Especially, Firefox/Mozilla extension work on xpi basis, which is closer to rpms that the Gentoo-recompile approach.

      --
      May I use your sig please?
    25. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quit complaining, not everyone knows that much about linux.

      Not everyone, no, but I would have hoped one of the GOOGLE DEVELOPERS WORKING ON THE PROJECT knows at least a little about Linux.

      My experience is that developers that know that little about Linux write software that expects to be run as root, writes user configuration data to stupid places like /etc/google/users instead of $HOME, and similar stupidity carried over from Windows.

    26. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by HamOpMW · · Score: 1

      What do you want to bet this is a Redhat8.0 thing? That's what their servers run (they must think Redhat is the only Linux distro?)

    27. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Randseed · · Score: 1
      That's nice. Well, I guess that gives Google plenty of time to release their toolbar like, say, a couple of decades.

      Idiots.

    28. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Esine · · Score: 1

      That's Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
      Red Hat 8.0 exists.

      -- dbg

    29. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Splab · · Score: 2, Informative

      Odd I like to think of myself as being part of the set "everyone" but I have no clue about what versions DeadRat is running these days, I threw that away many years ago in favor for Debian and Gentoo and never looked back.

      Just because you think something is obvious it doesn't mean that "everyone" does!

    30. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Azzhole · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quit whining. By the time the package makes it to DebIan stable we're looking at 2011...........

    31. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by coolcold · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      thanks, I am one step closer towards a better OS, windows

      You might want to tell that to all the bosses running RH as well. Hope that helps

      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
    32. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by m50d · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But this doesn't help them at all. Will they think Ubuntu is a lot older because it's only on version 5? It's stupid.

      --
      I am trolling
    33. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >Red Hat 8.0 exists.

      Exist-ed before it was end-of-lifed years ago.

    34. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it's great that Redhat puts resources into Linux development, and they have some influence on it, they certainly do not own Linux or its development.

    35. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish you knew how much i hate you.

      As a Gentoo user,

      Whatever, just fuck off.

    36. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by plott · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's a commie

    37. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously he meant RedHat.

      Then he should have said RedHat...


      It's a fucking typo.

    38. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --usepkg

      If you don't WANT to compile, you don't have to, and you can treat emerge just like apt-get.

    39. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by cshark · · Score: 1

      I bet he's got sphinkter monkeys too. Damn monkeys.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    40. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      If you are a casaual linux user, and don't bother knowing kernel versions and the like, then you should use a distro that allows you to look to them for help. I wouldn't expect a software vendor to list which version of each distro the software would work on. With most applications, you have to download, make, and install applications manually when it comes from the developer. If you use package management systems for your distro, look to them for packaged versions of the software that you want. It really works out quite well regardless of your experience with the underlying linux technology. I use slackeware packages when I can, and when they work for my purposes. The packages can easily be found for each Slackware release. I know that the dependancies are going to be met by the distro that I have. If I choose to download and install myself, I make sure I have the dependancies covered. And Slackware is in the stone ages when it comes to package management (well, swaret may be pretty good, haven't tried it yet.) Debian and the like have no problems with dependancies. So I don't see this as a problem at all, merely an attribute of a computing solution designed to give its users the maximum of both freedom and flexibility. In this case, I agree that listing the version of Firefox would most likely be all that was needed.

    41. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then their servers are old as fuck.

    42. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by lpcustom · · Score: 1

      You know unless I'm just totally clueless he should have just left the "this works with windows blah blah and linux 8.0+" out of the whole message. It's a firefox extension right? So wouldn't firefox version requirement have been sufficient?

      --
      Beer! It's what's for breakfast!
    43. Re:Linux 8.0?!? by Mehtuus · · Score: 1

      It's a fucking typo.

      Honestly, with the level of exactitude that I have seen from a number of the the original posters (not just here on /. but elsewhere too) this is not too hard to fathom. Are they in a hurry? Lazy? Or are they just ignorant of the language they are using?

      Regardless of the reason, if they are posting an editorial article of any sort they should always check, check, and recheck again for correctness before they post the article.

      But alas, the scope of the Internet is vast. That allows for people that have English as a non-primary language. A language that they are still learning. And that goes for some of the younger English speaking people too. All of the rest fall in line with ether being lazy, in a hurry, or just don't care.

      And last, but not least: English is a living language. But the general rules still apply.

      --
      http://mehtuus.googlepages.com
  4. That's great.... by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but really, I'm doing just fine setting Firefox's search box to use Google.

    1. Re:That's great.... by eln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't it set to Google by default?

      Honestly, what does the Google toolbar offer that Firefox doesn't already have, or that isn't already adequately covered by another extension?

    2. Re:That's great.... by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The highlighter. And it looks a ton better.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    3. Re:That's great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm sure Google would enjoy Firefox users not being left out of the PageRank system.

      Personally, I would enjoy a Google search bar that's not on the order of 16 characters wide.

    4. Re:That's great.... by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My thought was actually "How is this different than the googlebar I've been using in Firefox/Linux for months, now?"

      Looking at the screenshots, I don't see any difference in functionality. Only slight layout differences.

    5. Re:That's great.... by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 2, Informative
      searchbox resizing extension:

      https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?application=firefox&id=349

      why this wasnt just built into the GUI in the first place, i have no idea.

    6. Re:That's great.... by FLEB · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Is there a way to get the old Mozilla "Search xxxxx for xxxxx" in the URL bar in FF? That's about the only thing holding me back from jumping to FF.

      Well, that and the anemic Preferences dialog.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    7. Re:That's great.... by justMichael · · Score: 1
      Honestly, what does the Google toolbar offer that Firefox doesn't already have, or that isn't already adequately covered by another extension?
      Maybe an easy way to check PageRank? Or did someone else already make an extension for that and I missed it?
    8. Re:That's great.... by Chowderbags · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a highlighter built into the find. Press control+f, type your word, and click the highlight.

    9. Re:That's great.... by NerdConspiracy · · Score: 1
    10. Re:That's great.... by WARM3CH · · Score: 5, Informative
      Honestly, what does the Google toolbar offer that Firefox doesn't already have, or that isn't already adequately covered by another extension?
      Highlighting the search terms (no, it is not the same as / or control+F), Showing the page ranks, One click translation of the page, Backward links, Showing the google cache for the page. The other feature I really missed in Firefox was google bar's excellent AutoFill feature to fill the forms with a relatively very high accuracy and the option to fill specific fields only by typing a password (like credit card info...)
    11. Re:That's great.... by MrFlannel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except that find button isn't linked with what I just searched for, which really is nice.
      Often I find myself searcing for a technical spec, or whatnot, and I want to get to the part that I JUST saw in the little google preview blurb, since I know that's what I need. This just saves me from having to do anything but click the word on the tollbar.

      --
      Clones are people two.
    12. Re:That's great.... by antiknijn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then learn how to use smart bookmarks. Make a bookmark, set it to:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=%s

      and put "g" in the keyword field. Searches are a simple as "g searchterm" in the address bar, and you gain all the space of the search box.

      I've got similar smart bookmarks for google groups, images, babelfish, several dictionaries, mathworld, acronyms, ... Possibilities are not very limited.

    13. Re:That's great.... by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      I never use these nice search boxes. Setting your homepage (or one of multiple homepages) to google is good enough for me. Alt+H , search string, Enter, Done.

    14. Re:That's great.... by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      yeah that was supposed to be Alt+Home ...

    15. Re:That's great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or so you dont need type g searchname.
      just type searchname and presss enter

      goto about:config change keyword.URL to
      http://www.google.com/search?q=

    16. Re:That's great.... by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      The googlebar firefox extension does exactly what you describe.

      I am interested to know what additional features this new firefox toolbar offers that googlebar can't already do.

    17. Re:That's great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Track all your searching?

    18. Re:That's great.... by mikkom · · Score: 1

      That's not a new feature, googles search already does that even if you use it from firefox search box.

    19. Re:That's great.... by tod_miller · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having read the ctrl-f comment below: You cannot ctrl-f highlight multiple words.

      Having highlighting on a page from a search is nice, plus the PAGERANK is a useful tool in itself for web designers. I would be interested in this, although I loath to loose screen space.

      How about have the Menu bar hideable?

      I only ever use tools / extensions (page info being available on right click to get to media tab)

      --
      #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    20. Re:That's great.... by Momoru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well that Googlebar probably doesn't track your web surfing habits like the Google brand one.

    21. Re:That's great.... by Cow+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative


      Even better: hit Ctrl-F, type your word, hit Ctrl-Return.

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    22. Re:That's great.... by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am interested to know what additional features this new firefox toolbar offers that googlebar can't already do.

      Well, hopefully it can share another toolbar with other buttons already on it, because the last version of googlebar I tried insisted on having an entire bar to itself, thus wasting more screen space.

    23. Re:That's great.... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Not sure if this is what you mean, but firefox has a search bar to the right hand corner of the window. You can click and choose which search engine and type what you want in the box.

    24. Re:That's great.... by TophP · · Score: 1

      Better yet, you can search within a page by using the "/" character. Any browser that incorporates vi commands is fine by me.

    25. Re:That's great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if I want to highlight two words?

    26. Re:That's great.... by nickos · · Score: 1

      Place the two words in quotes.

    27. Re:That's great.... by cshark · · Score: 1

      There's pagerank, which is incredibly handy, if you maintain web sites or do any SEO

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    28. Re:That's great.... by nickos · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but I don't think Firefox extensions are compiled. If this is the case it would be easy enough to strip out the offending code if necessary. It won't be needed though because Google will offer the option to disable this sort of behaviour just like they do in the IE version.

    29. Re:That's great.... by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Right, but on Mozilla, you can just type into the URL bar and hit a button to search. it eliminates the step of tabbing to the "Search" bar. It's minor, but actually is much more convenient, especially if you're used to it.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    30. Re:That's great.... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      why bother with the search box at all? you can just type google "search terms" in the address bar. you can even change it to be g "search terms" if you want. check out the quick searches menu.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    31. Re:That's great.... by jubei · · Score: 1

      The thing in firefox are Quick Search bookmarks. For each bookmark, you can set a shortcut that will invoke that bookmark with some string replacement. Then you can just type 'gg search term' in the location bar. It is actually faster than mozilla's search function once you get it set up.

      I think that google is already set up by default, but the shortcut is 'google'. It is probably better to set this to something shorter, like 'g'.

    32. Re:That's great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've clearly never used the Google toolbar highlighting.

      It automatically highlights each of the search terms on the resulting page. Separately. With different colors for each one.

      Firefox's find feature, while excellent, cannot do that.

    33. Re:That's great.... by an_mo · · Score: 1

      There's got to be a way to quickly make a greasemonkey script that does just that

    34. Re:That's great.... by TheKnightWhoSaysNi · · Score: 1

      Google's Form Fill is much better than any of the the available Firefox plug-ins. That's the feature I miss the most.

    35. Re:That's great.... by TimeSpeak · · Score: 1

      errr... sphell chek, autow link, highlites, [page wrank] auto fill, and G news
      yo
      As for FF plugins, they do adequately cover many aspects. But it's nice to leave FF search bar open for dictionary imo.

      --
      Am no fek Buddhist, but this is enlightenment.
    36. Re:That's great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Honestly, what does the Google toolbar offer that Firefox doesn't already have, or that isn't already adequately covered by another extension? "

      It offers Google the ability to know what sites you're browsing.

    37. Re:That's great.... by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      Highlighting the search terms (no, it is not the same as / or control+F)

      Can you say how it's different? There's a "highlight" button to the right on the search bar in Firefox. Hitting that causes all matching words on the page to turn yellow. How is google's different?

    38. Re:That's great.... by 0ptimus · · Score: 1

      You can actually save yourself a lot of trouble by learning the shortcut keys. Ctrl-L will give you the address bar for a URL. Ctrl-K will give you the search box.

      Hope this helps.

    39. Re:That's great.... by quick9vb · · Score: 1

      Honestly, what does the Google toolbar offer that Firefox doesn't already have, or that isn't already adequately covered by another extension?

      Google's toolbar isn't just for searching. This also allows Google the future oppurtunity of including some sort of advertising component (see: AdWords https://adwords.google.com/select/) into their toolbar.

    40. Re:That's great.... by piper-noiter · · Score: 1

      Mainly the Higlighter (Which others have mentioned.) What they really should do is just make an extention where you can add in google tool bar features.

      --
      Shick's Law: There is no problem a good miracle can't solve.
    41. Re:That's great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops, I thought we were taling about the Google toolbar on IE/the Googlebar extension for Firefox. Quoting a phrase joins words into one term as far as the highlighting's concerned with those...

  5. Yahoo's firefox toolbar by DarkHelmet433 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case anybody's interested, yahoo's firefox toolbar has been around for a while. It worked out of the box for me on Linux and FreeBSD machines, including a 64-bit build of firefox for FreeBSD/amd64.
    http://toolbar.yahoo.com/firefox?fr=firefoxtoolbar

    1. Re:Yahoo's firefox toolbar by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yahoo does not get much respect here on slashdot but I can't figure out why. They give you two gigs of free email, they have a very nice messenger. They let you create a very nice portal of your own choosing. They give you a calender and other productivity apps. They let you publish your resume on line. They let you make your own home page. They have the firefox toolbar (and ie). They have IP telephony (costs too much but it's integrated with messenger). The list goes on and on.

      Google gets all the hype, yahoo gets no respect. I wonder why.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Yahoo's firefox toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no banner ads + feel-good brand image = media darling

    3. Re:Yahoo's firefox toolbar by freeplatypus · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatelly, Yahoo! also attaches adds to Your outgoing e-mail's :(

    4. Re:Yahoo's firefox toolbar by alienw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only reason they have 2GB of email is because of Google. All of their services are ad-infested and crappy. The search engine sucks. I can't think of a single reason one would use Yahoo other than inertia.

    5. Re:Yahoo's firefox toolbar by Kinetix303 · · Score: 1

      Yes, he is. I am too. Yahoo has banner ads, flash ads, and popups, and makes me log back in every ten minutes. Google has inobtrusive text ads, and they don't attch themselves to the bottom of every email that I send.

      As far as search results goes.... you can't be serious?

    6. Re:Yahoo's firefox toolbar by bmalia · · Score: 1

      Yahoo has some cool services (The fantasy football is one of my personal favorites), but not all of yahoo's offerings work in firefox. Just try to watch a music video on launch.yahoo.com. And wasn't yahoo's search powered by google for the longest time? Whats most annoying to me is that if you goto one of Yahoo's chat rooms, you'll get pounded with instant messages from bots telling you to go sign up to see a webcam show. And there's no OPS to ban them. I don't know why Yahoo chat got more popular than IRC. Felt good to kick-ban bots. Maybe Yahoo created/distributed those kiddie scripts that wannabe's used to bring the IRC servers to a halt. "Hey, our chat rooms suck, but at least you can log in!"-Yahoo Chat

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    7. Re:Yahoo's firefox toolbar by snorklewacker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Google gets all the hype, yahoo gets no respect. I wonder why.

      They attach ads to all your outbound emails. This alone drives me away. I've taken to blocking all of yahoo's ads because they're so damn huge and intrusive, but since it bugs me ethically to frequently use their service with ads blocked, I just don't use their service.

      Yahoo's search is fine now, but they were leading the charge in "pay for placement" not two years ago. There's some interesting options like "save" and "block" in searches, but they appear to be no-ops. Seems to provide no value over google, really.

      Their toolbar is bundled with completely inappropriate things like acrobat, and shoveled onto my machine like so much spyware.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    8. Re:Yahoo's firefox toolbar by Evro · · Score: 1

      Google tends to get all the hype (and all the love) because they innovate, while Yahoo has become largely stagnant in terms of features.

      --
      rooooar
  6. Huh? by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Pop-up blocking is an in-built feature of Firefox..."
    Uh, yeah, so is google. Isnt the entire point of the google toolbar to add an in bar google search and popup blocking to IE, which both Firefox and Opera already have? Whats the point of this?
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Huh? by malarkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      The highlighting of the search terms in pages linked to by the results is not part of the "in-built" google search in Opera.

    2. Re:Huh? by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's also some page info stuff (possible to emulate with Bookmarklets, but not easy), the PageRank (only the One True Googlebar can do that), and text highlighting (a royal pain with bookmarklets, but the open source toolbar could do that. Besides, Firefox and Opera have inline search, making it unnecessary).

    3. Re:Huh? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 5, Informative

      There exists a google pagerank extension for firefox.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    4. Re:Huh? by jannesha · · Score: 1

      ...well, the Google Toolbar also gives the Page Rank of the currently viewed page, for starters.

    5. Re:Huh? by radish · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have googlebar installed on firefox - the number one reason is the way it creates a button for each search term to let you jump straight to that word on the page. No other search tool I'm aware of does that as nicely (though I'm happy to be proven wrong).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Huh? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Unless the download page uses your useragent this could be a powerful tool for recruiting new people to firefox. Someone here's the googlebar is great and blocks pop-ups, they go to Google's site to get it and they see two versions, one for IE, one for firefox. What's firefox? *clicks the little download firefox icon which google has placed next to their toolbar download*

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    7. Re:Huh? by discogravy · · Score: 1

      well, if it includes the blogspot stuff, I'd use it.

    8. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The google toolbar also has the Autolink feature: Turn street addresses into links to online maps.

      It's pretty goddamn handy! No more cut and pasting addresses into maps.google.com, because a link is created for you!

    9. Re:Huh? by saundersr · · Score: 1

      right on.... I'm already using the 'useful' features of the Google toolbar in Firefox... No popups + a google search box... I'd just be taking up more space by installing the toolbar...

    10. Re:Huh? by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      "the PageRank (only the One True Googlebar can do that)" You mean: doesn't violate Google's TOS

    11. Re:Huh? by akhomerun · · Score: 0, Troll

      plus opera costs freaking money

    12. Re:Huh? by JCY2K · · Score: 1

      Of course they have a button for it, well two actually; ctrl+f. This toolbar is redundant. The googlebar and firefox itself offere everything that a google toolbar would hope to give us.

    13. Re:Huh? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Not entirely unnecessary. Inline search often has trouble finding search terms that are in plain sight.. maybe it doesn't look inside iframes or something.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    14. Re:Huh? by badmammajamma · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      cheap fuck

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    15. Re:Huh? by trekstar25 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read his post. When you type words into the Google Toolbar, they automatically become individual buttons (i.e. one per word) that you can click on to surf through the page. The Ctrl-F feature in Firefox only lets you use one term at a time.

    16. Re:Huh? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Not exactly the same, but the Find-function (Ctrl+F) in Firefox, also highlights the words on-the-fly while you type it.

    17. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the web-surfing tracking features.

      See: http://www.google.com/support/toolbar/?quick=priva cy&v=3.0

      Google may collect information about web pages that you are viewing when the advanced functionality is enabled.

    18. Re:Huh? by dcam · · Score: 1

      Doesn't cut it.

      You can't have multiple terms in search, that are all independantly highlighted.

      --
      meh
    19. Re:Huh? by Council · · Score: 1

      In fact, I've found that I like it best when I have only a single toolbar. Here's how I configure it:

      If I type a URL and hit 'enter' it loads the URL.
      If I type a non-URL and hit 'enter' it does an 'I'm feeling lucky' search.
      If I type anything and hit shift-enter it does a Google search on the text
      If I type anything and hit ctrl-enter it surrounds the text with www.[text].com and tries to load the URL.

      I'm frugal with my screen space. I have a single wide strip on top with the current URL and no other text box. It doesn't really need to be that wide, but I have really grown to like this added simplicity to my interface. I only ever go one place to type things.

      (Not to evangalize, but I use Maxthon. Though I first started using this setup when I had Firefox.)

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    20. Re:Huh? by sehryan · · Score: 1

      And you know, my IE blocks popups. Has for a while now. I am pretty sure it was an update that was included with the XP SP2 update.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    21. Re:Huh? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      With highlighting you still have to scroll.

      With CTRL+F, you just hit the enter key and it does the scrolling for you.

      When (rarely) I prefer to see all search terms highlighted, I just use Google cache.

    22. Re:Huh? by dlbornke · · Score: 1

      Firefox's NeedleSearch plugin does provide this functionality ... plus you can add every other search engines (actually everything that gets posted by a form).

      Nicest thing is that by typing the word

      NeedleSearch

      into a search field on whatever side and press the correspondend search button, you allready have the new search engine added.

      Furthermore, you can add all those engines to the context menu ... so if you mark a word and press the right mouse button, you can use every search engine that you added to NeedleSearch (handy for translations of single words).

    23. Re:Huh? by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
      Dude/Dudette, you need NeedleSearch; highlighting of search terms, context menu accessible, and you can very easily configure it to search ANY search engine, as many as you want.

      I especially like its integration into the context menu: simply highlight an interesting term or phrase, right click and select the search engine you want to use to find a match (results will open in a new tab). Right now I have mine set up for searching IMDB, Amazon, Wikipedia, Merriam Websters as well as to Google search just wikipedia.

    24. Re:Huh? by akhomerun · · Score: 0

      cheap fuck

      $30 for a browser is like paying money for a notepad upgrade.

      where i work, i have to work 5 hours just to browse the internet. that's BS, i'm not wastingi 5 hours just to get something that my computer already comes with. I'm not being cheap, I have common sense.

  7. WHAT?!? by piecewise · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Who the fuck says "in-built"?????????

    Last straw, Slashdot. I'm outta here!

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:WHAT?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

    2. Re:WHAT?!? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who the fuck says "in-built"?

      Do I.

    3. Re:WHAT?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite common in New Zealand.

      In fact, it took me half a minute to wonder what you were getting at :)

      I'm assuming it must be one of those small vocabulary quirks that happen when you have a large number of English-speaking countries. It might even be one of those British (Colony) vs. American things.

      I can almost guarantee you'll find both words in your dictionary. Go on, look. I dare you :)

    4. Re:WHAT?!? by Stauf · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck says "in-built"?????????

      The dictionary writers?

    5. Re:WHAT?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Merriam-Webster agrees - inbuilt is the chiefly British (and associated former colonies) variant of the American-styled built-in.

      It saves a hyphen (though one is provided in the story submission) and just plain runs off the tongue easier :)

      I find it is almost always the Americans who criticise spelling and words that are British rather than the other way around. It is always amusing to have someone fly off the handle, suggesting that some word usage is sub-literate at best, only to inform them that the word is perfectly acceptable Queen's English and is usually the original form :)

      (Note: in this case, built-in is definitely in major use, but I would personally use inbuilt before built-in, just from exposure. Just as I would use indoors, inroads, instep :)

    6. Re:WHAT?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Note: in this case, built-in is definitely in major use, but I would personally use inbuilt before built-in, just from exposure. Just as I would use indoors, inroads, instep :)
      I'm not sure if your comparisons are apt. "Built-in" is a quasi-contraction of, for example, "It is built into the browser." I can't think of any corresponding phrases for your three examples, reversed word order or no.

      Now it is possible that I've got it backwards (that would be a fun coincidence), and that the phrase "built into something" actually derives from "built-in." But the phrase seems to make sense on its own, like "designed in," so I don't think that's likely.

      Note that I'm not saying "inbuilt" is wrong. My sole point is that your choice of examples did not effectively illustrate your point, at least not without further explanation.

    7. Re:WHAT?!? by DinX · · Score: 0
      Who the fuck says "in-built"?????????

      Yoda ?

    8. Re:WHAT?!? by BlackSabbath · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Who the fuck says "in-built"?????????

      Yoda.

    9. Re:WHAT?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, the examples have absolutely nothing in common in terms of meaning, but I was just trying to suggest that the reason "inbuilt" exists as a word is because there are a number of words starting with "in-" as well.

      Pure supposition, but it seemed possible to me that from common use of many words starting with "in" that people would at some point reverse "built-in" to "inbuilt" and not see anything wrong with it. (In sort of the same way that flammable came about because some people assumed "inflammable" meant "not flammable" due to the otherwise common use of "in-" as a negation). Again though, just a guess.

      All-in-all, I confess to having grabbed somewhat irrelevant examples for the sole point of bolstering my use of "inbuilt" :)

      Mea culpa :)

    10. Re:WHAT?!? by ceeam · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Off fuck, Yoda.

    11. Re:WHAT?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Last straw, Slashdot. I'm outta here!

      Sweet!

    12. Re:WHAT?!? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck says "in-built"?????????

      http://www.bash.org/?162468

      Apparently, these two are related.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  8. Wait a second: by commo1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    We do NOT need a Google toolbar. We have pop-up blocking and we have a definable Google search window built into Firefox. They should know better and not release the damned thing. Besides, when people open up Firefox for the first time, they go to "Firefox Start".

    1. Re:Wait a second: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's slashdot: complain that Google never releases anything for linux/firefox, then complain when it does that it isn't necessary.

    2. Re:Wait a second: by br0ck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Enabling pagerank allows Google to track every page you go to instead of just tracking searches and pages reached via searches. Collecting this information alone could easily make it worth their effort to create their own toolbar. /tinfoil

    3. Re:Wait a second: by ehiris · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ever since I stopped using IE because of the adware and spyware I can't completely get rid of, the one feature I miss from the Google toolbar is the in page form spell checker.

    4. Re:Wait a second: by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why release Firefox, we already have IE? Seriously, why shouldn't they release it, it's all about choice.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:Wait a second: by radish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, because choice is a bad thing. Sheesh.

      The lack of google toolbar was one of the things which kept me using IE for the longest time, until googlebar came along. If you think that search is all the google toolbar does, you really haven't used it.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Wait a second: by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative
      We do NOT need a Google toolbar

      Spellcheck your posts
      Autolink addresses to maps
      Blog This!

    7. Re:Wait a second: by costa9 · · Score: 1

      Maybe because of the PageRank(TM) which is missing in firefox. Personally I don't care about the rank, but apparently a lot of companies do.

    8. Re:Wait a second: by cujo_1111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tosspot...

      Why release Linux when we already have Windows?

      Why release MSN Messenger when we already have ICQ?

      Why release an iRiver when we already have an iPod?

      Why release a Mustang when we have a Corvette?

      It is all about choice. The automotive world is not the only place where this is a good thing...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    9. Re:Wait a second: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the google toolbar site:

      http://toolbar.google.com/googlebar.html


      Thanks for your interest in the Google Toolbar.
      It's currently available for Internet Explorer for Windows.

      Googlebar: We encourage Firefox, Mozilla, and Netscape® 7.x users to install the open-source Googlebar, developed and supported by Google fans. Learn more.

      Note that Firefox also has a built-in search box in the top right corner that uses Google as the default search engine.

      To learn about the Google Toolbar for Internet Explorer, click here.


      Seems like they spell all of this out.

    10. Re:Wait a second: by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its like .. different people have differing opinions here! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    11. Re:Wait a second: by penix1 · · Score: 0

      Part of the reason a lot of people went with Firefox to begin with was it was "light-weight" compared to Mozilla. Adding dufingletrons to it only serves to defeat that one goal. Sure, it's optional and all that but why even use Firefox if it is going to be slowed down by add-on bloat?

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    12. Re:Wait a second: by anti11es · · Score: 3, Informative

      For an in form spell checker take a look at spellbound It works on mozilla/firefox. I use it all the time, it's awesome.

    13. Re:Wait a second: by radish · · Score: 1

      It is lightweight. No one is forcing you to install the toolbar - if you don't want it, don't install it. Why do you care that I have the choice to install software I want?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    14. Re:Wait a second: by lazarus+corporation · · Score: 1

      There's also a Google PageRank Status extension for Firefox which shows the Google PR of a page discreetly in the bottom statusbar.

      Not that the toolbar PR is accurate, being about 4-6 months out of date...

    15. Re:Wait a second: by duliano · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. this is just another attempt by Google to gain more ownership of our desktop. In my opinion they are on the same quest for domination that M$ has achieved.

      No Firefox Google Toolbar for me

    16. Re:Wait a second: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Why release an iRiver when we already have an iPod?

      Why release a Mustang when we have a Corvette?


      Aah, so Google's trying to sell Google Toolbars for Firefox, and get in on some of that money that Apple and Chevrolet are earning! /me is enlightened

    17. Re:Wait a second: by penix1 · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you install. It just seems to defeat the stated purpose of Firefox. You want it, go for it.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  9. Why leave out the Pop-Up blocker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's at least one well-known extension for FireFox that's along these lines, and it's reasonably popular (AdBlock).

    Doesn't that indicate that a significant number of people would appreciate Google's crack it as well?

    1. Re:Why leave out the Pop-Up blocker? by eklitzke · · Score: 2, Informative

      Adblock is used to block banners, something that the adblock feature of the google toolbar does not do.

      --
      #include ".signature"
    2. Re:Why leave out the Pop-Up blocker? by Mant · · Score: 1

      Adblock blocks elements of a page, pop-up blocker block pop-ups are are built into firefox. Hence Google leaves out the pop-up blocker in the Google bar for Firefox.

      Googlebar never did what adblock does.

    3. Re:Why leave out the Pop-Up blocker? by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      And they probably never will since it could be used to block Gooooogle ads

  10. Not Entirely As Advertised by NBarnes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pop-up blocking is an in-built feature of Firefox

    If only that were still true.... Sadly, the advertisers appear to be way ahead of the Mozilla devs on this one.

    1. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by XMyth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you tried Flashblock? I haven't seen anything get around standard firefox popup blocking and flashblock. Most sites that get around firefox's popup blocking are using flash to open the window.

    2. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1
      I have this problem a lot as well. This looks like it's probably the appropriate bugzilla entry for this bug.
      Sorry, links to Bugzilla from Slashdot are disabled.
      Looks like you'll have to copy and paste the url. Interesting.
    3. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by vanza · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now that you mentioned it I found out why I get popups at work and not at home. There's an option in firefox to disable popups from plugins. Just go to about:config and change "privacy.popups.disable_from_plugins" to "2" (create the option if necessary, type "integer").

      Done, no more popups.

      --
      Marcelo Vanzin
    4. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by Saeger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, those damn DHTML overlay "popups" are becoming much more common, and they're not trivial to filter out either. Firefox & Privoxy can't block them (yet).

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    5. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 1

      Disable javascript. Yeah, it's that simple.

      Oh, right, there are actually some legit uses of javascript. There's a plugin that lets you whitelist/blacklist sites to use JS on... can't find it now, as it refuses to install as a normal user under linuz moz, but I know it's out there...

    6. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by Given+M.+Sur · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. Why on earth isn't this enabled by default (or even an option in about:config by default)?

      --
      nil
    7. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by h4ter · · Score: 1

      Using this in my userContent.css has stopped all pop-ups, even the ones that Firefox can't take care of naturally.

    8. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also get the Script Block extension that disables javascript totally on a site by site basis. Rates up there with adblock IMHO.

    9. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by MrEnigma · · Score: 1

      Dang, that's awesome.

      I've personally never even been in there...and that it was that easy..but not documented. Shout this from the roof tops, it appears to work for me!

      Thanks!

      --
      GeekWares - Buy and Download Today!
    10. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox Popup Fix:

      Type the URL of the config pane into the address bar, it's URL is about:config

      Create a new integer value called privacy.popups.disable_from_plugins and give it the value of 2

      No more popups through Java or Flash, either! :-)

      The last step is to scan your system for adware that's generating popups from outside Firefox.

      Incedentally, this feature was there all along... the only reason MozDev left it off by default was because they were afraid this feature would break too many legitimate sites.

      I have no trouble with it, myself, but if you do, just set the value back to 1 or 0 and things should be okay.

    11. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by ampathee · · Score: 1

      Except for filthy CSS floating windows - although they aren't that common.

    12. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by tgd · · Score: 1

      Install AdBlock with some good filters.

      Its possible I just don't hit sites that have them (altough it seems unlikely) but I've never seen a pop-up in Firefox.

    13. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by coolcold · · Score: 1

      tried this?
      https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?id=79

      not a permanent fix yet though

      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
    14. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by digidave · · Score: 1

      It's called NoScript and it installed fine for me as a normal user on Ubuntu (both FF 1.04 and Deer Park A1).

      I highly recommend the script. Even Slashdot tries to run a non-slashdot.org script (falkag.net) that gets blocked.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    15. Re:Not Entirely As Advertised by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      It's infact damn near impossible to filter them, as they use legit methods (e.g. simply a div with a higher z-index).

      You couldn't really block high z-index without hurting a lot of normal websites too - especially in the future (when css3 will be fully supported).

  11. Re:Wait just a dog gone second by truckaxle · · Score: 5, Informative

    google toolbar has other features like Google Maps, Google Mail checker, Google Video, Google Desktop searching, Google Suggest, and website thumbnails(preview images) on the Google search results.

  12. Google Compute by rayde · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I didn't RTFA but I wonder if this will enable me to participate in Google Compute...

    1. Re:Google Compute by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You don't have to run Google Compute to fold, even if you want to fold for Google...

      If you want to fold for team Google, install the Folding@home client from http://folding.stanford.edu/, and set your team to 446.

      Why you'd want to do that, though, is beyond me. Fold for team 2630, instead - that way, you actually get to fold for a real team (The Tech Report). While you're at it, fold for the subteam (basically, a shared username) "dont_ya_mean_type" (without the quotes).

    2. Re:Google Compute by rayde · · Score: 1
      lol... how about i just send you my laptop while i'm at it? ;-)

      I think what sets Google Compute apart is the possibility of it running similarly to BOINC (in theory), in that it could participate in a series of challenges down the road, all through a simple interface. Sure you can go and install the individual clients, but the Google Compute feature is more likely something an average joe will use.

      sorta like the old SETI@home... when it was just a simple screensaver, it was easy to convince everybody to use it. now the BOINC client requires you to keep track of complicated project IDs and URLs and really has made the whole project less accessible.

      If Google Compute worked easily through the Firefox toolbar, it would add a nice pool of users.

  13. don't need it... by purpleplatyduck · · Score: 0

    Beyond the basic search capability, the popup blocker was the only useful thing about the toolbar (pre-SP2, and then that became unneeded as well). Since Firefox already has both features, I doubt many users will find this even worth the 2 second download or the miniscule screen space it takes.

  14. Redundant? by saskboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Shouldn't google get a Redundant -1 mod for this toolbar since you have the Google multifuntion search bar in the corner of every Firefox window anyway?

    I smell spyware...

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The toolbar also shows all of the query words with a unique highlight color and highlights the same in the document itself. Very useful. Additionally, you can just click one of those words in the toolbar and it will navigate to the first instance in the document. Another useful function. It really does much more then simply providing a form to Google.

    2. Re:Redundant? by Phil06 · · Score: 1

      Why do you need a Google toolbar for IE when it already has a search function built-in. I'll answer that; The search participants slowly abandoned it and MS let it languish. Google started saw an opportunity to capitalize on this weakness and is now eating their lunch with the Google search bar. MSN has belatedly innovated a copy of the Google bar, too late.

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    3. Re:Redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a shower.

    4. Re:Redundant? by nandhp · · Score: 1
      > I smell spyware...

      Then you should inspect the source code before you install it. unzip(1) the XPI and the JAR inside the XPI and then use less(1) on the files within.

      P.S. I found the URL of the toolbar: http://toolbar.google.com/firefox/

  15. Why so late ? by karvind · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I am not trying to be troll here, but why Google waited so long to provide the toolbar for a non-IE browser ?

    How about other neat google goodies like Google Desktop Search and Picasa photo organizer ? Any guess if they would provide these utilities for *nix too.

    1. Re:Why so late ? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      You call Picasa a utility?

      Methinks some Google developers might be a little pissed at that one...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    2. Re:Why so late ? by peterpi · · Score: 1
      Because the number of people using a non-IE browser is negigible
      (or it has been, up to now).

      Blah blah netcraft confirms it blah blah 10% install base, blah blah blah, blah. I know IE is teh SuXXor and firefox is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but google are doing mozilla a favour by porting their app to a niche browser

    3. Re:Why so late ? by peterpi · · Score: 1

      whoops, a typo in the word and the link! If only I had the google toolbar to correct my speeling ;)

  16. It's not Firefox launching the popups. by spiritraveller · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is plugins like Flash and Java that launch the popups now. If you disable Java and Flash, you will find that you no longer get popups.

    You can use the Flashblock extension to run only the flash animations that you want to run.

    1. Re:It's not Firefox launching the popups. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java can't make your browser open a new window (at most it can open a Frame/JFrame). What is more common these days is adding an onclick to an anchor that opens the popup as well as takes you to where you wanted to go. This is something that probably should be made blockable in Firefox as executing javascript is somewhat irrelevant when you are leaving the current URL anyway.

  17. Googlebar has several other merits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Beyond the obvious search bar, Googlebar has a few other useful functions that the default Firefox one does not have, such as the ability to search within one site. Something I use a lot is the ability to quickly jump to and highlight the keywords you've just searched for by clicking them in the bar. It makes finding relevant info. on a long page much easier.

    1. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

      Clicking "edit", "find" has worked wonders for me....

    2. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by Beolach · · Score: 1

      Hit the / key. You have just started Find As You Type - type what you you want to find, and it will jump you right to it.

      --
      Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
    3. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by the_weasel · · Score: 1

      Do you know this is already in Firefox?

      At least it is for me. I click '/' and type, and it finds what I am looking for. Thanks for reminding me about the feature though - it is one of those I know exists but keep forgetting when I want to use it.

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    4. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by the_weasel · · Score: 1

      Ooops. I was browsing unthreaded and missed your parent, sorry. Obviously you are referring to the feature in Firefox, as a reply to the original post.

      Sorry about that.

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    5. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the advanced options under preferences:

      Begin finding when you begin typing

      Googlebar?

      No thanks.

      dustin

    6. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by prostoalex · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're talking about the ability to search within one page, the original poster was asking for the ability to search within one site. Such as within the domain.

      Could be accomplished by adding site:slashdot.org to the query, or alternatively, Yahoo! toolbar for Firefox (has been there all along) has a search within the site button.

    7. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by Beolach · · Score: 1

      I wasn't replying to that. If I need to do that, then I'll stick the site: keyword into my query in the google search. What I was replying to was the OP saying "Something I use a lot is the ability to quickly jump to and highlight the keywords you've just searched for by clicking them in the bar." For that, Find As You Type (and ctrl-g to find again) works great.

      --
      Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
    8. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Next time you use Firefox, press / and type what you want to find in the page.

    9. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by prostoalex · · Score: 1

      Ah. I stand corrected.

    10. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      I use this feature too. However, I also use the GoogleBar ability to highlight search terms (different colored highlights - just like a Google cache version of a page) on occasion. Sometimes it helps scan through a page and picking out groups of search terms that are significant versus the occasional hits that aren't significant. And I also use the clicky-clicky buttons to search within the page for terms... why retype?

      It seems to me that if type-ahead (or / search) was sufficient, I wouldn't be using these features of Googlebar. But that's my personal preference. Your milage may vary. I invite you to try it out yourself if you haven't already.

    11. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Searching within one site in the default bar:

      site:slashdot.org "Score:5, Troll"

      Quickly jumping to and highlighting the words you searched for: try searching and using the buttons "next", "previous" and "highlight".

      Again, what is there so great about the google toolbar that isn't already very handy?

    12. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      "At least it is for me. I click '/' and type, and it finds what I am looking for. Thanks for reminding me about the feature though - it is one of those I know exists but keep forgetting when I want to use it."

      CTRL-F opens up the same thing as hitting / for me. How can you forget a feature as simple as CTRL-F (Control Find, get it?)

      This even works in IE, although the search isn't "while you type"

    13. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by MustardSauce · · Score: 1

      Beyond the obvious search bar, Googlebar has a few other useful functions that the default Firefox one does not have, such as the ability to search within one site. Something I use a lot is the ability to quickly jump to and highlight the keywords you've just searched for by clicking them in the bar. It makes finding relevant info. on a long page much easier.

      Both of these are present in the Firefox Googlebar. Search within the site, I'm feeling lucky, highlighting of search terms, buttons to jump to the search terms.

      You must be confusing the Googlebar with the default search box.

    14. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by Bake · · Score: 1

      For that, Find As You Type (and ctrl-g to find again) works great.

      And what if I'm searching for a gazillion keywords? I have to type each and everyone of them in, won't I?

      Why should I waste my time typing in the keywords I just typed in when there is a button in the toolbar that takes me to the exact keyword I want?

    15. Re:Googlebar has several other merits. by the_weasel · · Score: 1

      I forgot about the / shortcut, not the Find functionality. Get a life.

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
  18. And this changes things how??? by Rooked_One · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm using firefox

    I see the google search bar

    I don't think anyone goes to google for anything besides searching....

    My .000002 cents

    1. Re:And this changes things how??? by tanthalas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      GMail, Google weather, Google Maps, Google Groups... if you haven't tried these out yet, the only question you've to ask yourself is, "Why?"

    2. Re:And this changes things how??? by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

      no gmail account, I use weather.com, and i've memorized every map known to map... and I don't have friends. ;)

    3. Re:And this changes things how??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... and I don't have friends. ;)

      Er... Google Groups is nothing like Yahoo! Groups. Google Groups is simply a web-based non-binary Usenet reader, you know, those newsgroups that have names like alt.math.recreational? Of all places, I don't think newsgroups are where you find friends---more like forums where you exchange info, opinions, and flames.

    4. Re:And this changes things how??? by bugbeak · · Score: 1

      And mail.

  19. Haven't you noticed? by neurokaotix · · Score: 0, Troll

    Google is trying to be a friend to the world of OSS. They're just trying to give you something for that browser you seem to feel is so superior.

    --
    "...if people respected copyright more, like you guys do with the GPL so religiously, [the DMCA] wouldn't be necessary."
  20. Google Bars by HillaryWBush · · Score: 1

    I am using Safari which as some know does have a built in Google toolbar. Although minimally featured, it does the job. The code behind this bar can be summed up as: Do exactly what the URL field does but add "www.google.com/search/" to what the user typed. So why is this news? WHY??

    1. Re:Google Bars by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      So why is this news? WHY??

      Because the slashdot editors had a feeling it would annoy you.

    2. Re:Google Bars by MarsBar · · Score: 1

      So you're saying "I've no idea what this software does but I know it's of no use"?

  21. Search site anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless I am mistaken (could be, I am on a PDA, so I don't have firefox to confirm), you need the toolbar to make search site easy. I use that feature all the time (plus up a level is useful on the googlebar in firefox)

  22. Two questions. by MHleads · · Score: 1

    * With so many cool extensions available do I need Google toolbar? * Will be available on Linux?

    1. Re:Two questions. by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Read the article.

  23. pagerank by degraeve · · Score: 1

    You can't see the pagerank of the page unless you use the google toolbar. As far as I know.

    1. Re:pagerank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So google would know every single site you visited? Sorry, I don't consider myself totally paranoid, but that freaks me out.

    2. Re:pagerank by hazzey · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There is the Google Page Rank Status extension that does the page rank. I don't have the link at the moment, but of course a google search will find it

  24. the power of google... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bill Gates: "Damn Google for stealing the last rational argument to stay with IE! Steve, get me my litigation hat!"
    Steve: *deep sigh* "I'm suing, I'm suing..."

    1. Re:the power of google... by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

      apart from a lot of websites not working with FF, the toolbar is really the only reason for using IE still, as FireFox renders so much faster. Oh, and active-x controls.

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
  25. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How pointless is making a toolbar that repeats whats already available? Im not wasting my precious screenspace on a second google search...

  26. Highlighter... by wvitXpert · · Score: 2, Informative

    Exactly, that is the one thing I have to have. I'm always searching for something that I can't find on the page and it's so nice to be able to just hit the highlight button and boom, there it is. Other than that I really have no use for a search field at all, I almost always just go to google.com for searches in safari for example (though I don't know why).

  27. One word. by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

    Highlighter.

  28. The only reason... by stupidcomputers · · Score: 1

    I use the Google tool bar is for the word search buttons that are created when I enter a search string in. I find a high value in this by quickly locating the keyword I was searching for in the document with just a click of a mouse. I wish firefox would enable this as a feature in their status bar or some other unused area of the screen. Anyways, I look forward to the release.

    1. Re:The only reason... by Beolach · · Score: 1

      FireFox has a feature called "Find as you type", which will do this. Hit the / key, type what you want to find, and it will jump you right to it. Want to find it again? Ctrl-g will find the next instance.

      --
      Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
  29. Got an A for effort anyways by Bootard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    While I think it's really cool that Google is giving a wink and a nod to alternative browsers, OSS, and the whole shebang, I have to wonder how useful this will be. I admit that it has been a long time since I had google toolbar for IE, but I only ever used it for two things: popup blocking and easy access to a google search. Firefox does those things already. So while I like their probable motivation, I don't know how useful the extra % or two of functionality is going to be.

    I think instead of porting the IE stuff to FF, google should use the easy extensibility of FF as a way for easy experimentation and come up with some wild stuff that hasn't been seen yet. Firefox is all early adopters; I think google would have great success on all fronts testing out all their really forward thinking ideas on FF and then porting the stuff that works well to IE. As it is, they are being a little inefficient here.

    (Cause providing the best search engine, the best free email, and google maps is nowhere near good enough, dammitl. Those lazy bastards aren't taking over the world quickly enough)

    --
    exceptio probat regulam in casibus non exceptis
    1. Re:Got an A for effort anyways by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      Google is giving a wink and a nod to ... OSS

      Erm, they run their multi-bilion dollar business on Linux.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  30. I use the prGooglebar extension by alonsoac · · Score: 1

    http://www.prgooglebar.org/

    it has everything I need, I don't see why google would even bother when things like that exist.

    prGooglebar is based on another one:
    http://googlebar.mozdev.org/

  31. nice, but what's the point? by xedicate · · Score: 1

    Most of the more attractive functions (search box, pop up blocking, word find) are already included in Firefox, and there are extensions avaliable for everything else. Why get a toolbar that would take up 20 some pixel (height) of my screen space?

  32. But this way, Google controls it. by cbreaker · · Score: 0

    They get a bit of their software running on your system, and they control how that software interacts with their systems.

    We might not need it, and I probably won't install it, but that's probably why they are doing it. That, and because every acknowledgement of OSS as a viable alternative to Microsoft is good for everyone except Microsoft.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  33. This is good news - Really by nihilistcanada · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know some of you are going to run around with your hair on fire about the "man" using this toolbar to spy on us, etc... But really this is great news for FireFox. Firstly anyone who has used the IE Google Toolbar and tried the various FireFox extensions that mimic it know they are a good, but ulitmately a pale comparison to the original. The ease of use, and the fact that it simply works make the IE Google Toolbar a great, well, tool. I can't wait for the Firefox version. By Google releasing this it proves that FireFox is a big deal to the corporate world. Not IE big deal, but at least its a start. Plus with FireFox's ability to use extensions you have the best of both worlds, you can roll your own so to speak, or if you want a simple all in one, use the Google Firefox Toolbar. You have now one less reason to use IE and one more great one for using FireFox.

    1. Re:This is good news - Really by MustardSauce · · Score: 1

      "they are a good, but ultimately a pale comparison to the original. The ease of use, and the fact that it simply works make the IE Google Toolbar a great, well, tool."

      I use the googlebar extension on Firebox and the Google Search bar on IE. I'd be interested in how you think that googlebar is a pale comparison of the the IE version. It seems pretty much like an exact copy for the UI and functionality points of view. Plus for me, it has always worked without any problems.

    2. Re:This is good news - Really by MustardSauce · · Score: 1

      Correcting myself, googlebar doesn't have page rank. I don't use page rank on IE.

    3. Re:This is good news - Really by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested in how you think that googlebar is a pale comparison of the the IE version

      As I mentioned to someone else, the last version of firefox googlebar I tried could not share another toolbar with other buttons already on it. Instead, it required an entire bar for itself, thus wasting more screen space.

      The IE google toolbar allows me to put it on another toolbar...I used to put mine on the bar next to all the forward/back/reload buttons.

    4. Re:This is good news - Really by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      it simply works "It simply works" == code words for why closed-source proprietary solutions are better than free software solutions. I.E.: Mac OS X -- it simply works. Google Toolbar -- It simply works. Windows XP -- it simply works (on crack.)

    5. Re:This is good news - Really by fermion · · Score: 1
      Google toolbar is useful as it compensates for certain deficiencies in IE. Otherwise it is like realplayer. Useful, but one is never sure exactly what information google is collecting or will collect, and what might be done with it. In both product you can turn off the spyware features, but one never knows.

      So it is a choice. For IE the choice is often clear because IE is nearly useless on it's own. For other browser that provide a more customer centric approach, I have found nothing in Google, or Yahoo, or the number of other value added products to deal with the uncertainty. I know that everyone has been harking on the highlighting features, but most one is looking for a phrase or single word. The find function not only highlights one instance at a time, but also take the user to the location.

      So, while google might be a big thing for some people, for those that just wants a browser that works, it is a bit of overkill. If for no other reason that the valuable screen real estate. Besides that, it is good that google is paying attention to all browsers. It means that IE is losing market share, and they must expand to other browsers to acquire thier consumer data.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:This is good news - Really by TheKnightWhoSaysNi · · Score: 1

      The Google Toolbar has a reliable form fill. The FireFox plugins basically suck at this.

  34. Yeah, I have this already by zig973 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's called 'google '

    1. Re:Yeah, I have this already by SilentSheep · · Score: 1

      Who modded parent insightful?? waste of mod points if you ask me!

      --
      .
  35. WRONG by rebug · · Score: 1

    It's not like that at all.

    --

    there's more than one way to do me.
  36. what's new by LinuxRulz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see the interest to install this. Firefox has almost (if not) all the features of that google bar:
    - Search and highlight within a page
    - Easy google,ebay,etc. search (using mycroft and its extensions)
    - Popup blocker (which works even better in combination with adblock)
    - Auto filling form fields
    - Browsing by names, instead of URLs
    Really, what's left? oh yeah, screen space lost for a useless bar full of existent features and colored O. Well, maybe I'll install it for the colorfull logo, since it fits well with my current theme but that's all! :)

    1. Re:what's new by BoogerBob · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is for people who haven't figured out that there is a google search bar at the top...my ex-girlfriend didn't know it existed until i pointed it out to her even though it was staring her back the whole time

    2. Re:what's new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this thing you call a girlfriend?

    3. Re:what's new by xutopia · · Score: 1

      I think having googlerank would be nice.

    4. Re:what's new by LinuxRulz · · Score: 1

      then use the pagerank extension!
      http://www.tapouillo.com/firefox_extension/

  37. Useless-osaurus rex by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    No doubt, it has more features then then the standard Firefox, Mozilla, Safari, etc google bar, but I find it fairly useless. All I see is features I don't need and browser clutter I don't want.

    At the very least, this thing should access all of Google's weird searches. Movies, Maps, etc.

    Also, it should be in Klingon.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Useless-osaurus rex by 3nd32 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the first part, but they're way ahead of you on the Klingon part. They also have "hacker", "Bork, bork, bork!", and many real languages.

  38. Not redundant by the_womble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All those posts on the lines of "we have this already" are missing several points.

    Firstly, this is about choice. You can have the official Google toolbar or the alternatives. Google have even said they will continue to link to Googlebar so users know they have the choice

    Secondly, it is more likely to be used by non-geek users, simply becuase it comes from Google.

    Thirdly, it is very good publicity for Firefox - it will be mentioned in Google press releases, and on pages about the Google Toolbar.

    Fourthly, it will pressure others who have IE only extensions to produce Firefox versions - as Yahoo and Clusty already have.

  39. popup blocking by Tekoneiric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone notice that Firefox has been getting more popups lately?

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    1. Re:popup blocking by dustinbarbour · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah.. advertisers are smarter than you think. Try getting the FLashBlock extension and then disable Java. Watch those popups go straight to zero.

    2. Re:popup blocking by Caledai · · Score: 1

      Download the adblock xpi.
      Download NoScript xpi - and only allow javascript to run on trusted sites.

      If a popup occurs - track it down via the source - and block it - almost guarantee its from another server than the website.

      Using NoScript xpi makes it even easier. You can allow scripts for slashdot.org but not falkg.net for a single page - thats my settings for this site.

      --
      Although it can be funny, tell them to plug the power in.
    3. Re:popup blocking by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      adblock by itself is nearly useless. You need to block all the banner websites yourself, and I mean ALL of them (ze whole internets). More work than closing popups. But if you share the effort with other people by using and extending Filterset.G for adblock, that's a completely different matter. You get most of banners filtered off.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  40. No PRGoogleBar! by ihtagik · · Score: 1

    How's the proposed bar any different from the PRGoogleBar?

    http://www.prgooglebar.org/

    Firefox/Mozilla extension with all the features of the IE GoogleBar. C'mon Google give us something really new for FFox...

    1. Re:No PRGoogleBar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The prgooglebar can't be moved in the toolbars. For some, that's the difference between staying with IE and switching to Firefox. I know, because I've had people not switch because of this very thing.

    2. Re:No PRGoogleBar! by compro01 · · Score: 1

      well, that's the reason for me. this is all i've been waiting for to make the switch.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  41. can't beat ctrl+k by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Informative

    google toolbar may be nice and dandy, but if i recall correctly, they didnt have any hotkey features (maybe they'll have it in the firefox version). but i've gotta say, you just can't beat ctrl+k.

    if for every search, i had to take my right hand off the keyboard, move it to the mouse, click on the google toolbar, move my hand back to the keyboard, and enter my search phrase, then hit enter, i'd be so inefficient compared to how i am now.

    someone mentioned searching highlighted words. that may be nice a nice feature, but i'd prefer type ahead find. just type the word i want, and keep on hitting ctrl+g. no need to use the mouse at all. it's not as pretty nor as simple to use as google's, but it gets the job done.

    recently i changed my default search engine to A9. that was because i had recently made a purchase from amazon and my pi/2 discount disappeared. though 1.57% off isn't much, as a bargain hunter, it hurts me to not be able to save every penny i can, and it can take from 24hrs to 3 weeks after you start to use A9 again before the pi/2 discount returns. so as a precaution i switched over to A9 so it won't happen next time.

    to my surprise, A9 results were very close to google's on the things i searched for and i actually got what i need from A9 just as i would have in google. so now A9 has officially become my default CTRL+K.

    but i didn't get rid of google. it just takes 2 more key strokes. i made google a keyword and now all i have to do is:

    CTRL+L
    g keywords
    ENTER

    and google will work as if i did:

    CTRL+K
    keywords
    ENTER

    1. Re:can't beat ctrl+k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do understand that A9.com uses Google for its search results?

    2. Re:can't beat ctrl+k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its ctrl-j on my platform, you insensitive clod! :)

  42. Hardly newsworthy by MicroPat · · Score: 1

    This isn't a big deal at all. I just wasted 1.23 minutes of precious time! Let me know July 7th if there are any NEW features for Google Toolbar worth mentioning.

  43. Greasemonkey! by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's also some page info stuff (possible to emulate with Bookmarklets, but not easy), the PageRank (only the One True Googlebar can do that), and text highlighting (a royal pain with bookmarklets, but the open source toolbar could do that. Besides, Firefox and Opera have inline search, making it unnecessary).

    Meh. All of that and more can be done with Greasemonkey (scripts directory) (Internet Explorer implementation), without the added clutter of Yet Another Toolbar, and without the potential paranoia of a corporation behind it (referring to the crap storm when Google shipped Autolink in the IE toolbar). Greasemonkey is open source, developed by individuals, and each script is just javascript which you can easily inspect before choosing to install in case you're worried about a script "phoning home" to track your browsing. It's also better than bookmarklets because it runs the scripts automatically (you can tell it what urls to include or exclude, if you don't want a script running on every page).

    Finally, once you've installed Greasemonkey or Turnabout (What? You don't already have them installed? For shame!), check out my sig for a script to remove Roland Piquepaille stories from Slashdot.

    1. Re:Greasemonkey! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ah, didn't think about Greasemonkey...

      FWIW, User JavaScripts is the Opera version of it, and it has a Greasemonkey compatibility mode.

    2. Re:Greasemonkey! by Osty · · Score: 1

      FWIW, User JavaScripts is the Opera version of it, and it has a Greasemonkey compatibility mode.

      Yes, I should've mentioned Opera. It's not 100% GM compatible but many GM scripts will work. Here's a page with some Opera-specific scripts (that page also links to the main Opera script repository), including a GM emulation library (implements various GM_* functions, and adds a few hacks for compatibility), but I ran into some implementation issues I documented here, about 2/3rds of the way down the post.

  44. Spyware/Adware by DavidLeeRoth · · Score: 1

    Considering the bar is Open Source, do you all think that malicious people can use this for bad and create adware bars based on this one?

    1. Re:Spyware/Adware by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      Of course they could ! but the same can be said for many open source projects. That said, I havent seen a spyware infested version of firefox yet. Open Source is supposed to protect against this kind of thing from happening - having the ability to evaluate the source code kinda makes it difficult to hide things!

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:Spyware/Adware by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Well, there are quite a few spyware versions of eMule, DC++, Azureus, gaim, and few others. Sure it's easy to detect they contain spyware. But if you manage to get your fake webpage above the genuine sourceforge link in Google (happened to eMule several times, DC++ too), lots of morons will grab your version. And open-source programs are very easy to include such stuff, and make it legal too (just release sources to your spyware :)

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  45. About time we got the REST of the functionality. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been waiting for this for a while. While I appreciate the utility of Firefox's built-in dedicated searchbar (I have wikipedia, dictionary.com, google, and imdb on mine), I miss the 'open cached version' right-click options you get with the IE google bar.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  46. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    already done

  47. nice feature but.. by John_Renne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like the idea of the google toolbar, it brings some features that extend the functionality of the little google search-box that's default in firefox. On the other had, we got 83 search extentions for firefox at the moment. Will the google-bar just be another one in the list or will it actually bring something extra the others don't have..

    --
    /(bb|[^b]{2})/
  48. We already have this by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can already do this in Firefox my friend, just download the GCache extension and give it a whirl. Works like a charm.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:We already have this by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks. I'll give it a try.

      --

      Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  49. Bars slow things down by Kris_J · · Score: 0

    The features are nice, I really like everything about the A9 toolbar, except that these bars appear to really bog down the web browser. I get freezes and slow response when I'm flicking between tabs or working on https sites. And not just from A9. Pretty much every toolbar or plug-in that makes parallel requests slows the web browser down noticably.

  50. Ahhh yeas. by NanotechLobster · · Score: 1

    Redundancy at it's finest.

    1. Re:Ahhh yeas. by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

      except of course for things like the popup blocker," the e-mail said (Pop-up blocking is an in-built feature of Firefox)

      I was thinking the same thing ...
      Isn't a google toolbar pretty much a built in feature of Firefox.

  51. Simpsons did it! by tehlinux · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uh, I mean Yahoo, Yahoo did it. :P

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  52. Firefox does not block all popups by master_p · · Score: 1

    except of course for things like the popup blocker," the e-mail said (Pop-up blocking is an in-built feature of Firefox)

    Firefox does not catch all pop ups. I have the latest version, but there are sites that can display popups even in Firefox. The popups appear when Firefox gets the focus. That's on XP.

    1. Re:Firefox does not block all popups by Packet+Pusher · · Score: 1

      you need to install flashblock, that or uninstall flash. That will remove 99.9% of all of the popups on the internet.

    2. Re:Firefox does not block all popups by master_p · · Score: 1

      I installed Flashblock, but I saw no change: some sites' popups are still there.

  53. SearchWP by ctstone · · Score: 1

    I use the awesome searchWP to fill this need.

    After downloading it, you'll need to activate it by going to view->toolbars->customize and locating the terms-toolbar. Drag this onto the toolbar (I prefer the wide open space right next to the help button). You can also drag the Highlight icon onto the toolbar for more functionality.

    Download the searchbox auto updater (updates the FF searchbox with terms you enter on the actual google site) and the search box extender (lets you expand the width of the FF searchbar) and you have a fully functional google toolbar with none of the mess. It's all very simple and blends quite well into the Firefox GUI.

  54. Jeeves has had this for a year... by mikek2 · · Score: 1
  55. Why do I want this for firefox when..... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Firefox alrerady comes with google search in the upper-right hand corner, blocks pop-ups, and generally keeps me safer without the need to waste up even more of my hard disk space with useless, RAM-consuming resource-hogging extraneous crap? What's the problem, Google? Just being made the default serch engine for Firefox's built-in search, not to mention being the search engine by default on the firefox startup page, isn't enough for you? You've gotta add even more crap to my browser?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Why do I want this for firefox when..... by narkotic · · Score: 1

      You've gotta add even more crap to my browser?

      Noone is making you use it.

      (the bar, or the browser for that matter)

    2. Re:Why do I want this for firefox when..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read here, you fucking zealot monkey. Do you even bother educating yourself before you puke your zealotry all over the Internet? Damn, you zealots are fucking RETARDED!

  56. Insightful? by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    This is ignorant at best!

    My suspicion is that this guy hasn't used an RPM distribution in ages, and that's if he runs Linux at all, which is a big if.

    urpmi, yum, Smart, and Apt4RPM have made RPMs as easy as debs from the user standpoint.

    1. Re:Insightful? by digidave · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. I use RHEL AS 3 and I can't wait until I change it to a Debian system. Yum and the like are just poor replicas of apt-get.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    2. Re:Insightful? by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1
      In my start of Linux a little over a year ago, I tried Mandrake, SUSE, Slackware, and a few others. I stuck with Mandrake the longest, because it made things work for my system easier than the others, and it was pretty straight forward. (YMMV) But, I, even then, hated RPM. YAST was ok, but it wasn't what I thought of for an easy install. I've started using Kubuntu (cause I like KDE) and apt-get is a wonderful thing. It takes all the frustration out of the dependancy hell with RPM and no worries on incompatible RPM packages. It just seems to work better.

      I've yet to try Gentoo, so I can't speak for emerge, but apt-get has made me enjoy the Linux experience so much more than I did with RPM based distros.

    3. Re:Insightful? by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

      http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/

      Your problem is with dependencies, NOT with RPM! So many people make this mistake - RPM is the format in which the updates are delivered, it doesn't do dependency checking. And as far as I know, neither do .deb files (I'm not 100% sure on that, but I think so). The trick is that RPM CAN be used with a wrapper than checks dependencies. Red Hat has stuck with RPM because they think it's a smart way to distribute packages. Since then, they have seen several methods of delivery, RHN, yum, apt4rpm...

      If your problem is dependencies, that's fine. But don't blame RPM for not doing what it's not supposed to.

    4. Re:Insightful? by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1
      I'm still new at all this, so perhaps I was just doing something wrong. But I do know this: apt-get install [package name] is a lot easier than: finding the package, downloading, either rpmi or using the gui thing, and finding dependancy packages, later, rinse, repeat.

      Perhaps RPM wasn't doing what it wasn't meant to do, but it seems the problem is that it wasn't meant to do it.

      All I'm saying is this: as a new (relatively) convert to Linux, apt-get has been much more friendly than RPM was. But I suppose that's why there are so many different ways of handling things across the distros. Everyone likes something different.

    5. Re:Insightful? by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

      Are these commands any more of a hassle? They both use RPM.

      #yum install gaim

      or maybe you like

      #urpmi vim

    6. Re:Insightful? by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1
      never did the yum thing; urpmi never seemed to work for me. Again, I'm new so it's entirely possible I was doing something wrong.

      apt-get just made my life easier.

      just sharing my 2 cents on the situation being discussed. lol didn't mean to offend.

    7. Re:Insightful? by say · · Score: 1

      Uhm. RPM is an acronym for RedHat Package Manager. The RedHat Package Manager does dependency checking, but the last version I tried did it in a much poorer fashion than comparable package managers like apt and yum. The .rpm files do not do dependency checking. They don't do anything at all, because they are not programs.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    8. Re:Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Then why don't you use apt-get? It works fine on redhat.

    9. Re:Insightful? by Vizzie · · Score: 1

      Dependency information is built directly into the .deb files at creation time, including version information, and any hand-crafted dependencies. Dpkg dependencies have been there since the start and Just Work.

    10. Re:Insightful? by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      On my fedora system I can run apt-get install [package name] and works for me. No try downloading a .deb file and run dpkg -i ???.deb and see if it looks allot like rpm -i. The fact is I haven't had a reason to download an rpm outside of the repo's I use in sometime the same with my debian systems.

  57. page rank, page info, voting buttons by dlefavor · · Score: 1
    ...all are important to ecommerce sites that rely on google placement for traffic.

    not particularly important for casual surfer, though.

  58. To free or not to free? by krasmussen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know if it will be licensed with a free (as in freedom) license?

  59. Googlebar Lite by jgbishop · · Score: 1

    Try my extension, Googlebar Lite. I've improved on Googlebar's search word buttons by playing a sound (like the IE toolbar) when the search word is not found on the page. http://www.borngeek.com/firefox/googlebarlite/

    --
    Go, and never darken my towels again! -- Rufus
  60. Google to Release Firefox Toolbar by chrisnewbie · · Score: 2

    What bothers me about google tools like pop-up blocker and the famous google desktop are that people dont realize or dont talk about the legitimate pop-up windows it blocks.
    I see people wondering why they cant access some secure website, bank account or do task because that pop-up blocker has just prevented the "click yes" button that was in the pop-up windows.
    As for the google desktop search, i installed it and then tried to search files in this manner *.*exe and it didnt understand what i was searching for, i then reverted to windows own search engine and, to my surprise, Google search had overrun the utility and i couldn search my computer the way i wanted.
    Maybe there was a setting in the google desktop search that i didnt setup but these are things that people should take in account before installing everything about google.
    Dont get me wrong i use firefox and the google toolbar, but i have to revert to IE because it's not supported everywhere (mainly ms-win update).

    I know i'm offtopic, but People should adress the good and the bad about google.

  61. EarthLink Firefox Toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    EarthLink launched a FireFox Toolbar "beta". It includes their Scamblocker anti-phishing tool. It's only Windows (says XP only but seems to work fine on my 2000 box).

  62. PageRank in FireFox by DVega · · Score: 1
    "the PageRank (only the One True Googlebar can do that)"

    You are wrong

    God save Reverse Engineering

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. HERE is what is different! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The google toolbar (for IE at least) has new features like "Look For Map" -- which creates a google map for any street address found on a webpage -- and a language dictionary which translates a word from English to another language if you hover your mouse over it.

  66. PageRank Extension by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    Catch is, as I understand it, all of the pagerank extensions rely on methods that essentially violate Google's usage strictures. They're turning a blink eye for now, but widespread adoption could lead to it being shut down.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. There's still more... by bovilexics · · Score: 1
    <bias_notification>posted by member of googlebar dev team</bias_notification>

    There are a lot of other additional features of the Googlebar which aren't supported by the default Firefox search (including mycroft) and some are also not going to all be incorporated into the official Google toolbar either.
    • Google Account and GMail integration (new mail notification, etc.)
    • Add web page thumbnails to search results
    • Search result navigation buttons to easily navigate between result pages
    • Google Suggest, find as you type search criteria (work in progress)
    • Google Maps integration (maps or satellite image options)
    • Lots of international support for searches AND news feeds
    • Specialty searches, including Google betas (video, print, scholar, mylocal, nocalc, etc.)
    • Desktop Search integration
    • Complete customization of toolbar (button locations, show/hide/reorder all toolbar search buttons)
    • Freedom, open source - speculation that Google will be a compiled object extension and/or obfuscated into oblivion

    It would just be nice if naysayers would do their research before just stating that everything should just already be built into Firefox. This is far from true. However, if all you want is to just simply search Google (or Images or whatever) then JUST use the built in Firefox search box, mycroft, or bookmarklets - that will suffice. However, there is MUCH more to the Googlebar than just those simple search features.

    On another note, Google will have the ability to support things we cannot. Notice that Googlebar does NOT support proprietary or protected technologies (PageRank, Compute) though there are other extensions to the project which attempt to fill those gaps as well. They will also have better support since they have a dedicated team for this task whereas the Googlebar is a rag-tag group of volunteers who do what they can when they can, which goes in spurts.

    Bottom line is that you should just find which tools work for your searching needs and just use those. There are pros/cons/niches that are addressed by basically any of of these solutions (Firefox search box alone, Googlebar, soon to be Google Toolbar, Yahoo Toolbar, etc.) so just use the one that works best for you and don't try to convince everyone of what they don't need, espcially if you don't know what the potential options are that exist out there.
    --
    Are you bovilexic? Moo!
  69. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone's bitching about redundancy, but I think it's great that Google is coming out with their own bar. The user interface on the open-source one is pretty lame.

    For example: if you click in the search box slighly below the text, but still in the textbox area it drops down and you can't type anything. You have to hit escape to collapse the drop down before you can type your search term. This is not standard UI in windows. I click off by a few pixels and it delays my search--very annoying.

  70. Googlebar by accessdeniednsp · · Score: 1

    But doesn't the Googlebar work just fine?

  71. Re:Wait just a dog gone second by fupeg · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I like being able to highlight an address, hit a button, and have a Google Map of that address in a seperate tab. I also like being able to do Google Local search and Desktop search from the toolbar on my browser. Of course you can define all the searches and make them part of the Firefox search box, but you have to come up with your own nifty icons.

  72. Yahoo's Disk Quota by dakirw · · Score: 1

    They give you two gigs of free email...

    Actually, Yahoo only gives out one gig of free email. I'm looking at my (free) Yahoo mailbox, and I only have a gig. The two gigs is for people who upgrade to Yahoo Mail Plus.

    The point that another poster makes about Yahoo leading the charge for fee email service is true. Before gmail arrived, Yahoo initially offered 6 megs for free accounts, then later cut the quota down to only 4 megs for newer accounts.

  73. GNU/Linux, you insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's GNU/Linux, you insensitive clod!

    http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html

  74. url vs search by b100dian · · Score: 1

    I may understand you but seeing that many users fire up IE and type in MSN search box the URL I wouldn't one more confusion than this.

    --
    gtkaml.org
  75. Google is better.... no question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't believe the hype a while back but did my own tests to see for myself which was better. 99% of the time Google return not only more but more relevant results over Yahoo. Google does a better job of filtering out multiple page results from the same website/forum unlike yahoo.

    All the random samples I tried yielded better results with Google. "Hackmaster Flash" G-19, Y-1, "Freezeone" G-100, Y-19, "faygle" G-842, Y-117, etc. Also, google doesn't have the annoying paid placement that yahoo does to trick noob users.

    1. Re:Google is better.... no question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like i said, they were completely random, but many people have tried more scientific approaches than my "off-the-top-of-my-head" approach, including myself. I don't have the list I used a while back but the examples I gave were just to show that google usually* does a better job at filtering results and has a larger index.

      (* I understand that no search engine is/can be perfect but I, along with many, many others have found that google _generally_ is more larger, more efficient, and better, no question.)

      I'm sorry I just threw together a quick un-scientific test, but i had to go to class. for FUn, write a quiCK script that generates random words and see for YOUrself how many results come back from the same page/forum. ;p

  76. It's out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along with a couple of other FF only extensions:
    http://toolbar.google.com/firefox/extensions/index .html

  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. Traffic to Competitors and Option for No Ads by search_guru · · Score: 1

    Interesting to see that Google has built-in a feature that sends traffic to competitors, and removes ads. Though No ads feature doesn't seem to be working for me.

    --
    Search Marketing Journal http://www.se
  79. Never mind by search_guru · · Score: 1

    I was more interested in looking at another toolbar provided by customizegoogle.com. You may want to check it ou.

    --
    Search Marketing Journal http://www.se
  80. It is out by JoeF · · Score: 1

    in Beta here. They also clarified the "Linux 8" stuff, by putting Redhat in front of it...

  81. it's already out by roror · · Score: 1

    Get it from http://toolbar.google.com. Autolink and spell check are there along with others. Useful tip is Alt+s takes you to the search box in the bar.

  82. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion