Slashdot Mirror


Communications Infrastructure No Match for Katrina

jfourier writes "In this age of cheap commoditized consumer electronics and advanced mobile technology, why can't all the people of a city make contact during an emergency? Cell phone circuits filled up during 9/11 attacks and in the wake of hurricane Katrina very few victims can make contact with their families, despite the fact that they have all those mobile phones. The Red Cross is looking to deploy satellite equipment to restore communications in affected areas." From the article: "Katrina made landfall in Louisiana early this morning with sustained winds of 145 mph, but veered just enough to the east to spare New Orleans a direct blow. Even so, flooding, power outages and heavy damage to structures were reported throughout the region. The Red Cross tomorrow expects to begin deploying a host of systems it will need, including satellite telephones, portable satellite dishes, specially equipped communications trucks, high- and low-band radio systems, and generator-powered wireless computer networks, said Jason Wiltrout, a Red Cross network engineer. "

483 comments

  1. Windy by fembots · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wouldn't satellite signals be affected by rain and wind?

    1. Re:Windy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not on the moon.

    2. Re:Windy by Neil+Blender · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wouldn't satellite signals be affected by rain and wind?

      Yeah, they don't work if they get wet and the wind can really screw with their frequencies.

    3. Re:Windy by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Not once it's passed?

      I think that they are talking about temporary stuff to help replace the damaged infrastructure to provide service until repairs are made.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:Windy by AlexisMachine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wind no, rain yes.

      Ku Band singals are in the microwave range of EM frequencies, so are vulnerable to rain fade (which is ironic since many Meteorologists get their data this way).

      C-Band isn't as bad.

    5. Re:Windy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rain: If frequency >8-10 GHz: Possible with heavy rain. However, I think most satellite phones operate in the 2-5 GHz range.

      Wind: Not likely unless using dishes and those were physically move out of alignment by the wind.

    6. Re:Windy by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is why I am very frustrated at the FCC's limitations on UWB broadcast signal strengths. UWB devices are resistant to interference, and can have enormous ranges at very low power outputs. Not to mention enormous bandwidth and the potential for an enormous number of users. We're talking multiple gigabits at insane ranges with very little power. That is a lot more simultaneous voice than HAM radio or cellular service (or even wimax) can provide. Wimax is a joke next to UWB's potential, but with current limitations on UWB, it looks like UWB is limited to wires (UWB over cable TV coax), ultra-short range uses (Wireless USB), and wifi-type ranges (100 to 300 feet).

      300 feet at a thousandth the power of a cellphone. Now imagine if you had the broadcast power of a cellphone in a UWB device.

    7. Re:Windy by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      I don't know about satellite service elsewhere, but in South Florida, adverse weather frequently affects satellite reception.

    8. Re:Windy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you elaborate on why no one else has clued into your genius plan?

      Not to knock you, but come on, a man selling a million dollar pie better be able to show why that pie isn't just a pie-in-the-sky.

    9. Re:Windy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Has the unfortunate side affect of rendering geeks impotent..........

      Oh, wait, err.....

    10. Re:Windy by negative3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      While theoretically UWB can support an incredible data rate, in practice it's not possible. In my graduate research group (mprg.org) a whole group of people are studying UWB propagation, receiver structures, etc. To actually get the theoretical throughput, you need an incredible amount of power - because W/Hz is part of Shannon's capacity theorem. Even though the signal power spectral density is low and can hopefully blend in with the noise floor of any other receiver, the transmitter has to have a very powerful amplifier because it's power is going to be spread over a huge bandwidth. I'm not trying to be argumentative, I just wanted to bring up something a few of us discussed on a boring night at the lab this summer. People who have actually built transceivers so far can't get anywhere near the rates originally predicted (at least not without a shitload of errors). One very cool application of UWB is for radar/ranging/mapping. A friend of mine set up a UWB system that can determine the breathing rate & heart beat of a motionless person - even through a wall. I've also seen through the wall radar boxes for police applications (to scan inside a room before the cops break in to figure out where everybody is). Oh and for that whole noise floor thing, you don't want to be near one of those transmitters if you have equipment running. Their damn pulser would overwhelm my software radio's RF front end every time they turned it on - and I was transmitting across a room from a directional antenna (log-periodic) to my antenna array! ---- Now onto the whole cell phone systems being overwhelmed - the systems were not designed to handle thousands of people all using their phones at the same time. It's never going to happen.

      --
      "Physics is to math what sex is to masturbation." - Richard Feynman
    11. Re:Windy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the Red Cross uses DirecTV.

    12. Re:Windy by brainy · · Score: 0

      Coming from someone who works at a TV station, rain fade really sucks. We had rain fade yesterday, and our signal from our reporter in the panhandle was a bit weak at first. Then, CNN had some rain fade coming out of Atlanta, so there were problems with the signal we had from them. IIRC, Ku analog signals hold up a bit better in the rain than the Ku digital ones.

    13. Re:Windy by DenDave · · Score: 1

      Not if they use the Cellular Squirrel!!!

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    14. Re:Windy by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      "the transmitter has to have a very powerful amplifier because it's power is going to be spread over a huge bandwidth"

      I don't understand - what are the pratical limiting specs of UWB amplifiers? While I can see peak power might have to be high for an impulse waveform, the average power should still be quite low compared to most kinds of radio.

      Also, it sounds like your SDR might likely have problems with a lot of other kinds of interference, too. How does it react to cheap AC motors running nearby?

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  2. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to the article about 50% of science articles being wrong and whatnot.

    1. Re:Huh? by geomon · · Score: 1

      Gotcha!

      So much for subscriptions.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    2. Re:Huh? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

      What happened to the article about 50% of science articles being wrong and whatnot.

      Turned out, it was wrong.

  3. Ham Radio by Spetiam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do I even need to say it?

    Ever since the midwest blackout I've been meaning to get an operator's license... for 2m if nothing else.

    1. Re:Ham Radio by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Do I even need to say it? Ever since the midwest blackout I've been meaning to get an operator's license... for 2m if nothing else.

      My dad, 85, still participates in local Field Day, in Michigan. The ARRL seems to be easily forgotten in this age of designer cell phones.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Ham Radio by No2Gates · · Score: 0

      I've got my Tech class ham license for 2m and have HF equip. in case of emergencies. In case of emergency, you do NOT have to have a license, it is acceptable to transmit without a license in an emergency for emergency purposes.

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    3. Re:Ham Radio by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, then do it - the test for No Code Tech is not very hard, and then you can start getting practice operating, and start studying for the Extra when the FCC removes the 5 words per minute Morse requirement (any day now).

      Go to http://www.arrl.org/ - download the question pools (they are about to change - so get the correct ones), go by a shi^H^H^HRadio Shack and get the Tech, General, and Extra study guides, and spend a few minutes a night studying.

      The ARRL should have a list of testing sessions and locations - failing that, let me know where you are and I'll see what I can find out.

    4. Re:Ham Radio by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

      So do it, then! It is very easy with all the no code requirements now.

    5. Re:Ham Radio by DrEldarion · · Score: 0, Troll

      The thought of a bunch of clove-laden hams picking up debris is quite amusing.

    6. Re:Ham Radio by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I just heard a short piece on NPR about this:

      An 85 yr old woman was trapped on a rooftop. She somehow managed to get a cellphone call out to someone in Tulsa, OK. From there, the Red Cross took it, and asked for HAM assistance. From there, the message was relayed by ham ops to Idaho, then to Utah, then to [somewhere else], then down to the Coast Guard in Mobile, AL.

      She was rescued.

    7. Re:Ham Radio by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Let me point out that this is one of those times when battery operated amateur radio provides one of the best ways to get messages in and out of an affected area. In fact, this story at the ARRL has some information on how hams are helping in the recovery effort.

      It's too bad that so many will be willing to sacrifice HAM so that some miserable little power company can fill the skies with RF noise just so they can get an Internet feed. Hopefully the odd disaster will remind people that there are better ways to get the Internet, and that HAM operators serve in an invaluable service in times of crisis, and that BPL is nothing more than a shameless money grab.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Ham Radio by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Yea, that's whaat I don't understand. Is there really that much of a lack of amateur radio operators these days? A lot of hams LIVE for doing the RACES and ARES drills that deal with exactly these kinds of disaster scenarios.

      I imagine the problem was that most hams probably fled the area when the general evacuation was called for, now they can't get anywhere near the place to help. The Red Cross should be asking for amateur radio volunteers to help coordinate emergency communications... that's one of the entire reasons amateur radio exists!!!

    9. Re:Ham Radio by BenFranske · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Before someone points out that the power is out so the point is moot let me say that the power is out in this area but these RF communications are going out to receiveing stations where the power is NOT out and where interference would be a problem. Hams are generally supportive of new technologies such as BPL and would no doubt enjoy seeing it work out but the providers need to show a way to do it without creating interference on existing communications channels.

    10. Re:Ham Radio by xee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. In the aftermath of hurricane andrew my father and I (both hams) went into the areas with heavy devistation to take messages from people with no communication and pass them on to thier friends and relatives across the country. We also sat by the radio at home and made phone calls on behalf of other hams who were in the field taking messages. I'm sure this is happening in LA as well. Why doesn't ham radio get more press in times like this? Because Big Media doesn't want to encourage encroachment on THEIR airwaves!

      --
      Oh shit! I forgot to click "Post Anonymously"...
    11. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe everyone should have access to the airwaves and associated equipment? Might get inconveniently crowded for regular use but in an emergency it may save lives.

    12. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Salvation Army has an emergency network of Amateur Radio operators that support such emergency operations called "Salvation Army Team Emergency Radio Network" or SATERN. They take message traffic via the Internet.

      Health and welfare Information Request Form

      73 de WD5HHH
    13. Re:Ham Radio by ces · · Score: 1

      ARRL is mobilized and ready to move in with the Red Cross however they aren't being allowed into the area yet.

      The Red Cross works very closely with the ARRL and many Red Cross chapters have ham radio stations and volunteers with licences.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    14. Re:Ham Radio by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      I've been listening to the hurricane net on 14.325Mhz and the SATERN net on 14.265 and could hear first-hand reports of wind and other conditions from hams in the affected area.

    15. Re:Ham Radio by ces · · Score: 1

      Code is still worth knowing particularly for a disaster situation where signals may be marginal.

      Besides 5wpm isn't really that hard to do with a little practice.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    16. Re:Ham Radio by Snodgrass · · Score: 1

      We were streaming some helicopter news footage at work and the reporter said (paraphrasing) "Earlier there was a guy down there with a flashlight trying to say something or other in Morse code."

      I can't really blame the reporter for not knowing Code, but it was still frustrating to me that there's somebody down there who is sending a distress call and nobody can understand him.

    17. Re:Ham Radio by Frogbert · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Can someone tell me what is wrong with CB radio? If anything? It seems to me CB is the perfect fallback system.

    18. Re:Ham Radio by No2Gates · · Score: 0

      CB distance is VERY limited. Ham radio is capable of much greater distances. Plus with ham radio, you can connect to a repeater with a handheld radio with very little power. A handheld CB trying to communicate over 2 miles would drain the battery in no time. But a CB is still better than nothing....

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    19. Re:Ham Radio by yaroze32 · · Score: 0

      yeah, same thing with cell phones, you get LIMITED frequencies, (40 of em) and they will be Jammed with everyone and their dog on them, an example, turn on a CB to channel 17 or 19 (Especially in a Big City) and turn off the squelch, and listen to everyone climbing on top of each others signals, now have "Everyone" in the city doing that.

      or better yet,

      CB is locked down to 40 frequencies (channels)
      HAM 2Meter anything from 144.000mhz to to 148.000mhz

    20. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! you certainly have given me insparation to go ahead and apply for my ham radio license!

      thanks alot.

      I just wanted to return the favor to you. You see, i believe your sig to be in error. efax.com are actually NOT spammers. let me explain. Efax gives you a number that you can use to have people fax to you. they own this number and it forwards to their computer systems and highly redundant data networks. when a fax is recieved, they send it off to the email account of your choice! pretty amazing eh.

      as the CEO of a large fortune 500 company, i would definately say that efax has saved my business. Before i implimented the efax system, i was swimming in paper, getting covered in toner *daily* and not able to even aford my rent for all the power my army of fax machines was using! efax saved my business, and it can save yours too.

      so in conclusion, efax is NOT a spammer.

    21. Re:Ham Radio by Anonym1ty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When all else fails...


      ...Amateur Radio!

    22. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once looked at an eFax.com link, and now I get around fifteen mails per day from them.

      But you just keep going on with that freaky little toner-covered-office-bitch you seem to enjoy so much.

    23. Re:Ham Radio by ddeboer · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. If I remember correctly, CB transmitters are limited (FCC rules) to a maximum of 4W transmitted power. My cell phone, I think, transmits at no more than 0.3W. On the other hand, even with the lowest Technician class Amateur Radio license you can operate transmitters that emit up to several hundreds of watts. For example, my Ham transceiver in my truck will transmit at up to 50W. It's easy to see the benefit of strong communication signals - especially when repeater towers (cell phone towers, public safety repeaters, or even Ham radio repeaters) are taken down in a disaster.

    24. Re:Ham Radio by machinegunben · · Score: 1

      Yes, there really is that big of a need for HAM Radio Operators. Many of the people in the hobby are getting up in age, and there aren't nearly as many young, able bodied HAM radio operators nowadays to do disaster communications.

      Most younger people feel that they can just pick up a cell phone and call, and thats fine with them. Unfortunately, as we can see, they don't always work. HAM radios do.

      The hobby can always use more operators.

      --
      I'm going to create my own nerd website, with blackjack.. and hookers.. In fact, forget the site
    25. Re:Ham Radio by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      CB is better than nothing, but I wouldn't rely on it. A Ham operator can be heard around the world , and usually they're reliable as to broadcast times, frquency, etc.

      --
      C|N>K
    26. Re:Ham Radio by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Umm... That's not quite true. It is a commonly held misconception that in an emergency anything goes. However, in the real world it doesn't quite work that way... In case of emegency, you can transmit anywhere you wish, but you had better be prepared to answer for and justify your actions.

      You CAN still be held liable for the consequences of your actions after the fact. There were a couple of similar cases I read about where a guy out hiking got lost in the mountains and there was no cell service or any ham station reachable, and he used his modified radio to call into the local police repeater to report his emergency. Clearly he would have died if he had not been rescued, yet he was still fined and had his equipment confiscated because of his actions.

      In short, if you are faced with the decision of losing your Ham license or dying, you'll take the former, but as I said you will most likely have to pay the piper later.

      BTW - Yes, IAAH (I Am a Ham) and I'm the statewide repeater frequency coordinator for one of the largest metro areas in the USA, so I speak with some authority here.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    27. Re:Ham Radio by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      If you mean let everyone pick up licensed 2-way radios and let them all yak at once, absolutely not!

      There's a reason Hams and other public saftey radio users are licensed. We had to learn and now know what frequencies to use and which to avoid, and we know how to coordinate large groups of users on a single frequency without collision or a total free-for all.

      A good example of this is what happened to the cellular systems during the emergency, everyone went nuts and the uncoordinated onslaught rendered that communication system utterly useless. Doing the same to the other radio services as well would be a BAD thing.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    28. Re:Ham Radio by JPriest · · Score: 1

      You can get a copy of Now You're Talking! for about $20 and the exam itself will cost $14. NYT! is a very good book for the exam if you also want to understand the concepts. If you think Ham is too low tech, check out some of the DSP stuff and homebrew DSP equipment

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    29. Re:Ham Radio by bdowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being a Ham radio operator is like being in the US military. You get absolutely no respect from most people... until they can't do without you. "What an antiquated hobby", they say, condescendingly. Sure. It's the only communications modality which works without an infrastructure ... which is exactly the situation in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast right now. -W1DOC

    30. Re:Ham Radio by demachina · · Score: 1

      Japan's solution to disaster comm that I submitted on Slashdot a few weeks ago is a Geosync satellite with a 66 foot dish that will be able to communicate with essentially ordinary cell phones from space.

      Satellites have issues like latency and bandwidth but one of the beauties of them is they are completely above most earthly disasters and this one can communicate to people on the ground without a satellite dish.

      --
      @de_machina
    31. Re:Ham Radio by dagr8tim · · Score: 1

      Have any news articles pointed out anything worthwhile that Ham's have done during this whole disaster. I RTFA, and nowhere does it mention Ham's. Trying to take credit for something you had nothing to do with?

      --
      "Does your computer have IP on it?"
    32. Re:Ham Radio by ki4iib · · Score: 1

      Easy. Legally, CB talks across town. Amateur radio talks around the world.

    33. Re:Ham Radio by ki4iib · · Score: 1

      You should listen to NPR more. Or wander down and talk to your local Emergency Manager, who will tell you exactly how much they love their ARES ops.

    34. Re:Ham Radio by Cyberherbalist · · Score: 1

      This is something that gets into the news only slowly, and after the main event dies down. Hams are certainly out there doing what they can. See the ARRL press release on the situation.

      --
      "The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance."
    35. Re:Ham Radio by dagr8tim · · Score: 1
      Re:Ham Radio (Score:1) by ki4iib (902605) Alter Relationship on Tuesday August 30, @08:14PM (#13440922) You should listen to NPR more. Or wander down and talk to your local Emergency Manager, who will tell you exactly how much they love their ARES ops.

      Sadly, the last few charaters of my post came up missing, it was "" all put together. I'm friends with quite afew Ham's. While most are brilliant on in regards to their electronics knowledge, most of them take a very dim view of it's usefullness in this day and age. My question is last year when my grandmother's house was filling with water (twice) thanks to Francis & Ivan. Where were the ham's? The hams (along with nobody elese) provided no assistance in getting the several hundred pound oxygen tank/assembly out of the house ahead of (or back in after) the flood waters. So, I'm not impressed by the smoke & mirror's claim of the Ham mafia about thier own usefullness, or justifying their existance.

      --
      "Does your computer have IP on it?"
    36. Re:Ham Radio by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      If you have a Series 60 mobile phone, you can get a Morse Code text entry program that will help you practice Morse. I was into the amateur radio thing back in high school, but the Morse requirements (and cost of equipment) meant I never got my own license. A program like this probably would have made quite a difference.

    37. Re:Ham Radio by jdhutchins · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that so much is destroyed, and for their own personal safety, I hope all of the hams in the area were able to get out. Sure, you could still do UHF/VHF simplex with a mobile radio, but my guess is that most towers were destroyed- so most HF antennas and repeaters are probably gone. Power probably isn't an issue as many hams have batteries and a generator, but a flooded ham shack doesn't do anyone much good. That being said, hams may be able to help coordinate relief efforts once the storm has

      I'd also like to second (or third or fourth) everyone who has said you should go get your license. No-code tech is not that hard, and there may be classes in your area.

      Joshua, KC9IAF

    38. Re:Ham Radio by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute. Are you saying the code requirement for the General class license is already gone? I let my no-code tech license lapse because I wasn't interested in doing the Morse code thing (yes, the old hands are right, including the fact that with morse you can send a signal even if all the audio stage of your rig is dead and all you can do is cycle the carrier, but c'mon!)

      See, I know enough electrical engineering and RF to pass the theory test (although I'd have to bone up on the regs, freqs, and other esoterica), but I've always let the morse requirement stop me. I wonder if my call sign is still available? (I used to be N0ZES) and I wonder if my Dad's (silent key, he was W0VDI) is atill available.

      Maybe its time to get back into it...

      BTW, ham 3rd party communications in emergencies is the main reason to keep the hobby around, keep the bands around, and, yes, to keep it closed to the unlicensed. We (well, they now) are allowed to radiate a lot of power (200W on VHF and UHF, and 1500W on HF -- That's about 200 to 155 times more power than your cell phones) (Actually, that's a guess, I don't know what the power limit on cell phone signals is, but I'd be surprised if it over 1 watt. I'd be shocked if it was as much as 5 watts -- my guess is they are 50-750mW, anyone here know?)

    39. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry there were difficulties in getting help to a loved one. That said, Hams are primarily there to relay messages. If they see a problem, they can report it. Otherwise, someone's gotta tell them about it, and they can pass that information on to someone else (like the Red Cross, hospitals, law enforcement and the like). The Hams I know, if they can help with more than just passing messages, they usually will. If I don't tell them I've got a problem, how can they know to help? If I do tell them they still don't help (but were in a position to), then I find a new set of friends.

      They're people, they're "mail servers", but neither omniscient nor front-end loaders. That's my experience at least. Your milage may vary.

    40. Re:Ham Radio by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      It's rather like the laws that apply to justifiable use of deadly force - there's what the law strictly says, and then there's what you'll deal with in reality, and at best they bear only a passing resemblance to each other.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    41. Re:Ham Radio by ki4iib · · Score: 1

      Well, the FCC has made a NPRM saying that "Yes, Code is Going Away." Odds are, it'll be fact in about 3-6 months, tops. I've already passed my General exam, but I'm not sure whether I just want to be lazy, or go ahead and get my code out of the way...

      Anyways, you're basically looking at 300 milliwatts for cell phones.

      N0ZES is still reserved for you, assuming you're Michael Schwarz =) The FCC seems to be unaware that your father is now a silent key; apologies.

      Looks like $8 to renew your old call sign. Check out the link: http://www.qrz.com/detail/W0VDI

      Do it! and, if you do, welcome back =)

      73 de KI4IIB (a 19 year old, no-code tech, with a CSCE for General...just waitin' for code to go away... =) )

    42. Re:Ham Radio by ces · · Score: 1

      I don't have an amateur licence either but I learned Morse while in the Boy Scouts.

      I'm thinking of getting my license though. If nothing else than to help with the ARRL disaster and event communications groups. A decent handheld isn't that expensive and is enough to be a help.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    43. Re:Ham Radio by amper · · Score: 1

      KC2OOS, concurring. I just got my ticket in the mail the other day. Officially, I was licensed as of 2005-08-24.

      The Element 2 exam should be a breeze for anyone with a modicum of math, science, and technical skills. I passed a practice test online the first time without ever having studied anything specific to amateur radio.

      I'm learning the Code now. I want to pass Element 1 before it gets the axe.

      If I were more experienced and affiliated with a proper emcomm group, I'd be on my way to LA or MS right now. Last week, at my first club meeting (SJRA, oldest cont. operating club in the US), I hooked up with my township's emcomm coordinator. I'll definitely be getting involved--this won't be the last emergency the world ever sees...

    44. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we have a long list of the assholes who "dis" ham radio, and we remember to help them last in times of emergency.

      Now stop talking shit about us, your karma will improve, and maybe someone will help you next time a hurricane or tornado threatens you.

      Also, by the way, hams only communcicate, we don't fill sandbags or haul equipment for your ass. Look at your contract.

      Signed,

      The Ham Mafia

    45. Re:Ham Radio by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      But if it is anything like here in the northeast, tune anywhere on 2m or 70cm and it's a ghost town. 2m has pretty much become loaded with APRS trackers.

      And one thing to consider is that even if you had a 2m radio, range on those is generally limited to about 5 miles or so. What makes them work is a network of repeaters all over the place. But if they don't have power you're pretty much stuck.

    46. Re:Ham Radio by finkployd · · Score: 1

      And one thing to consider is that even if you had a 2m radio, range on those is generally limited to about 5 miles or so.

      You are off by about a factor of 10.

      Finkployd

    47. Re:Ham Radio by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I have a similar story. I know someone who was once robbed, and there police where not there to help him. Therefor, the entire law enforcement community is just a bunch of smoke and mirrors. Armed with my dataset of exactly one sample I can safely assert that none of them do anything ever, and so the whole concept of police must be a scam.

      You yutz

    48. Re:Ham Radio by pyser · · Score: 1

      Go to qrz.com and take the practice tests. They're fun to do, you probably remember more than you realize, and with some study of current rules & regs you'll be ready to show up at your nearest club's VE session.

    49. Re:Ham Radio by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      My question is last year when my grandmother's house was filling with water (twice) thanks to Francis & Ivan. Where were the ham's? The hams (along with nobody elese) provided no assistance in getting the several hundred pound oxygen tank/assembly out of the house

      SO you are upset about what? That communications people who volunteer their time and equipment - put their lives at risk to help others and spend their own money doing this were very busy doing what they do that they couldn't be grunts to help your mother move her oxygen?

      Why didn't you get her oxygen out of there?

    50. Re:Ham Radio by dagr8tim · · Score: 1
      SO you are upset about what? That communications people who volunteer their time and equipment - put their lives at risk to help others and spend their own money doing this were very busy doing what they do that they couldn't be grunts to help your mother move her oxygen?

      Why didn't you get her oxygen out of there?


      I happen to live 2+ hours away.


      And I didn't expect them to help move it. However my point was why didn't they call some form of services on their handy dandy, high tech radio network to help? You know like the red cross, the local authorities, somebody.

      --
      "Does your computer have IP on it?"
    51. Re:Ham Radio by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      I doubt this is true. I live in Tulsa and if something like this had happened, it would have been all over the news. Not one peep.

    52. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      as the CEO of a large fortune 500 company, i would definately say that efax has saved my business.


      I guess CEO's definitely don't need to spell correctly.
    53. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whadid I tell youse about "dis"n ham radio?

      You don't ever fuckin wanna be rescued, do youse?

      Waddya thinks we are, psychic or somethin?

      Ferget aboudit.

      Signed,

      The Ham Mafia

    54. Re:Ham Radio by vhf · · Score: 1

      5 Miles? Do you live in an electromagnetic vortex or something? Under normal conditions I routinely work stations on VHF that are 50 to 60 miles away from me with as little as 5 watts of power without the aid of the local repeater system. With very good conditions hundreds of miles are possiable without using repeaters. I think you must have made a typo or you need to do more research...........

    55. Re:Ham Radio by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Ok, so I had the exact details wrong, but here it is.

      "A call for help that involved a combination of cell telephone calls and Amateur Radio was instrumental in saving 15 people stranded by floodwaters on the roof of a house in New Orleans. Unable to get through an overloaded 911 system, one of those stranded called a relative in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. That individual, in turn, called another relative, Sybil Hayes in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, whose 81-year-old aunt Helen Elzy was among those clinging to the roof along with other family members.
      Hayes called the American Red Cross chapter, which contacted the Tulsa Repeater Organization. Using the Red Cross chapter's well-equipped amateur station, TRO member Ben Joplin, WB5VST, was able to relay a request for help on the 20-meter SATERN net via stations in Oregon and Utah to Louisiana, where the ARES net contacted emergency personnel who rescued the 15 people.
      "When all else fails, Amateur Radio works is more than a catchy tag line," says TRO's Mark Conklin, N7XYO. "It's a lifeline." He said as of late Monday evening, Elzy and the others on the roof were safe at a Red Cross shelter. "

    56. Re:Ham Radio by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      My experience has been that with an HT you don't generally get more than 2 or 3 miles.

      Serious mileage takes 5W and up. And of course there's the gain depending on they type of antenna you use, usually in the 3db and up range.

      But in my area of 1 land, 2m is dead.

    57. Re:Ham Radio by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. I have no doubts that what you've reported is true, but something like this should just be a slap on the wrist ($20 fine maybe) to discourage people from hiking without the proper radio / satphone / whatever.

      I'm sure the FCC/FBI/whatever has better things to be investigating than people making desperate calls for help in the least intrusive manner possible. I'm sure the guy wasn't just sitting there all day long jamming the police frequencies - he probably just radioed his location and got off the air...

    58. Re:Ham Radio by vhf · · Score: 1

      2m has pretty much become loaded with APRS trackers. This is not so. APRS in North America is restricted 144.390MHz. One frequency is hardly loaded..... (Forgot to include this in my orginal post)

    59. Re:Ham Radio by finkployd · · Score: 1

      HT's yes, but you didn't say that :)

      It is a shame 2m is dead there, it is pretty huge in Pittsburgh.

      Finkployd

    60. Re:Ham Radio by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      And I didn't expect them to help move it. However my point was why didn't they call some form of services on their handy dandy, high tech radio network to help? You know like the red cross, the local authorities, somebody.

      Did they know about it? As great as we Ham Radio Ops are, we are not psychic.

      Is it also possible that things reported by hams to the appropriate agencies are not acted upon. Sometimes they appropriate agencies do not have the manpower to respond.

  4. Red Cross Donations by learn+fast · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Red Cross Donations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I went in they called me a mad cow and told me to go away :(

    2. Re:Red Cross Donations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the american Red Cross is anything like the Canadian Red Cross, those donations will go straight to lawyer funds in cases such as the contaminated blood instead of helping people.

      In other news, the CAPTCHA I had to type in was unionize. Funny, thanks to union strikes, students will miss school. Ah well, it's not like the classes they miss are any good anyways.

    3. Re:Red Cross Donations by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but how much of your donation to the Red Cross will actually reach the people they say it will? The Red Cross has had a number of scandals recently showing either slow money transfer or money going to a different cause.

      You're probably better off finding a family in your extended social network that is in need of either supplies or shelter and helping them directly.

    4. Re:Red Cross Donations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't afford to pay now:

      1-800-HELP-LATER

    5. Re:Red Cross Donations by Savantissimo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My dad is a pathologist with over 25 years experience running a hospital laboratory. He says the Red Cross is just this side of organized crime. They take blood donations and RENT the blood to hospitals for something like $100/unit for about 3 weeks. Then, instead of freezing it, they either destroy it or sell it for components. This policy, along with their effective monopoly creates severe blood shortages, extorts money from gravely injured people and the continual artificial crises give them propaganda opportunities to look like heroes. In many other ways the American Red Cross is bureaucratic, inept, wasteful, callous and self-serving. They have huge reserves, palatial offices and they do not deserve your support. Don't give them anything without making sure they will use your gift as you direct, and get it in writing.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    6. Re:Red Cross Donations by afeeney · · Score: 1
      America's Second Harvest http://www.secondharvest.org/is also responding to the disaster. Please think about giving regularly to them or another food bank, as nearly all local food banks will be experiencing real difficulties probably for the next year. Or if regular gifts are out of your budget range, perhaps give once again after six months or so.

      Many of the nearby food banks that aren't themselves in affected areas are sending their own supplies to the affected areas, so they're going to be going low for a while. Additionally, the food banks in the affected areas will experience increased demand over the next year, at least, as people try to recover economically, and many of their local donors will probably be unable to give to them because of their own changed financial circumstances.

      I'm not affiliated with Second Harvest or anything like that, but I respect their work. Less than two percent goes to overhead and all the rest goes to actual services. http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/sear ch.summary/orgid/5271.htm

  5. Communications Failed! by geomon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Beat out messages on drums!

    Of course the system failed. The cities have flooded, there is no power in much of the area, and a good number of towers and other infrastructure has been damaged.

    The winds reached 140+ miles per hour. The uplands received 5+ inches of rain in 24 hours.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Communications Failed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cities have flooded, there is no power in much of the area, and a good number of towers and other infrastructure has been damaged.

      The winds reached 140+ miles per hour. The uplands received 5+ inches of rain in 24 hours.


      But what about my online pr0n? I can't get my online pr0n! THIS IS A CRISIS!!!!

    2. Re:Communications Failed! by Seft · · Score: 1

      Beat out messages on drums!

      Not necessary. SMS (Text) messaging should work fine even in the most congested networks due to the way it works (something like usenet, I believe).

      Problem comes when you can't get a signal.

    3. Re:Communications Failed! by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

      SMS messages will typically not get through in extreme congestion because delivery is best effort. They'll just get dropped. SMS uses the network's signalling mechanism, which as you can imagine is necessary for calls.

      Now, if you dedicated the network to SMS exclusively in an emergency, that'd be smart!

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    4. Re:Communications Failed! by neoweb · · Score: 1

      You mean cell towers need power? Go figure. Oh and to the morons who are looting New Orleans, YOU'RE WALKING IN TOXIC WATER!

  6. Ham Radio by BenFranske · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let me point out that this is one of those times when battery operated amateur radio provides one of the best ways to get messages in and out of an affected area. In fact, this story at the ARRL has some information on how hams are helping in the recovery effort.

  7. Dumbass question by Le+Marteau · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In this age of cheap commoditized consumer electronics and advanced mobile technology, why can't all the people of a city make contact during an emergency?

    That is the dumbest question I have ever seen on Slashdot.

    Sure, cell PHONES are cheap, but have you priced the towers and the infrastructure that SUPPORTS the phone? Plus, even though your cell phone has a battery, the batteries at the cellular provider won't last long when the entire frickin' CITY is without power.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    1. Re:Dumbass question by Deitheres · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly... mobile phones are not like walkie talkies... they don't connect directly to one another. While these systems are scalable, there is still a limit to the traffic capacity they can handle.

      It's like asking why your computer can't run a billion processes simultaneously-- the infrastructure just doesn't support it.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    2. Re:Dumbass question by Xygon · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! This is business, not emergency planning. To put in the infrastructure to support 100% of people making calls would be a bankrupcy waiting to happen. Batteries only last so long, especially when supporting real equipment...

    3. Re:Dumbass question by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Plus, even though your cell phone has a battery, the batteries at the cellular provider won't last long when the entire frickin' CITY is without power.

      Add in the fact that cell phones aren't reliable in perfect weather standing next to a tower, and people expect what?

    4. Re:Dumbass question by Lost+Found · · Score: 2, Informative

      Eh... all true, but the battery part. At least, I'm making an educated guess. Here in Telecom Corridor in Richardson, TX, Nortel's facility has (or at least, at one time, had) battery capacity to run Dallas for a week, and they don't even switch calls... just make switches.

      Of course, that is the PSTN, and I suppose cell providers aren't held to nearly the same standard.

    5. Re:Dumbass question by nairnr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here Here! Infrastructure systems are designed for common to peak expected usage. No City or company in there right mind will build roads, or phone systems to handle maximum similtanous usage. Think of it has your morning commute. How come everyone in the city can't just hop on the road and not expect delays? You want to build a 50 lane highway on the off chance everyone has to use it at once?

      The scale of the disaster is immense. When you have a city which is 80% under water up to 20' of water, I would think you would lose some critical systems!

      We had on time in one of our smaller cities - Lethbridge during Canadian Idol, you couldn't place a phone call cause everyone was trying to phone in and vote for there local boy.(he ended up winning). Now put that on the scale of a wide spread natural disaster. Good luck!

    6. Re:Dumbass question by hendridm · · Score: 1
      Add in the fact that cell phones aren't reliable in perfect weather standing next to a tower, and people expect what?

      I recommend switching your cell phone provider. Pronto.

    7. Re:Dumbass question by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Not sure how the battery comment ties in with the rest of your comment, but it's probably a good idea to run real equipment on a generator instead of batteries... It'd be very nice to have a number of cell phone towers be somewhat disaster resistant, if they aren't already. Especially since this might mean having a somewhat working cell phone network when the normal phone network is down.
      Also I wonder how well the current generation of cell phone protocols deal with a surge in people trying to make calls. I mean, obviously lots and lots of people get service busy errors, but are the resources that exist put to good use, ie are some people actually getting through? Or is everyone just sort of DOS-ing each other. Also: is it possible to decline service by default unless an emergency number is called? Another interesting idea would be to just disallow all phone calls, limiting usage to the resource efficient text messaging.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    8. Re:Dumbass question by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Nortel's facility has (or at least, at one time, had) battery capacity to run Dallas for a week

      Even when the entire city is under 6' of water? Doubtful.

    9. Re:Dumbass question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the answer to the storys question is: Because mobile phones aren't peer-to-peer. Next question: Why are mobile phones not peer-to-peer enabled.

    10. Re:Dumbass question by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Because there's no money in it (for the phone companies, that is). They make their money on service provided through their networks, not on the phones themselves.

    11. Re:Dumbass question by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      In the UK at least (Can't speak for the US, sorry) in a major disaster all mobile companies have a plan which effectively shuts down the network for non-emergency calls. There are some pre-selected users (normally emergency coordinators etc) who recieve service, but for the average Joe all they can make is 999 or 112 (Standard UK emergency number) calls. It can also have other numbers (such as disaster helplines) added to the 'allow all calls' list, meaning people aren't isolated.

      Whilst this doesn't deal with hardware damage, it does mean that what is left isn't overwhelmed by non-essential calls.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    12. Re:Dumbass question by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      First, the technical reasons:
      They're horrible radios. They transmit with very little power and do not have a great receiver. Even if they were peer-to-peer enabled, you'd only be able to talk to people who are close enough to receive your signal. That might be good enough for trying to find someone in a store, but it's little more than line of sight communications. To fix these problems, you'd need a bigger battery and a better antenna. If you're willing to carry that with you, a handheld ham radio is still going to be a better choice.

      Of course, the real problem is the business reasons:
      Phones, like many services, depend on forcing all traffic through the providers system for billing purposes. If customers were not forced to have their calls go through cell towers, they might start wondering why they're even paying for the service.

    13. Re:Dumbass question by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Even diesel generators don't run well under 10 feet of water...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    14. Re:Dumbass question by statusbar · · Score: 1

      Cost-benefit analysis shows that in that area, human life worth only during gestation, and therefore emergency infrastructure is not cost effective.

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    15. Re:Dumbass question by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That is the dumbest question I have ever seen on Slashdot.

      I think it should be noted that this isn't an easy feat to perform.

      BTW: I think cell towers run on emergency generators when without power, but those don't work if there's water in the intake. Lots of electronics don't like working when submerged in water, hence a lot of telecomm devices are down.

    16. Re:Dumbass question by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      The problem with being disaster resistant is that it costs more. Batteries are nice because most power interruptions are supply(as in electricity off), not delivery(as in power lines physically removed) issues. Batteries can be monitored automatically and replaced every few years. A generator has moving parts and needs fuel. This means it has to be maintained more often to remain functional. Generators can be rented for infrequent needs, but when a large number of people need the same resources at the same time, I wouldn't expect them to be available.

      I like the idea of limiting usage to text messaging. Falling back to text and emergency communications only when operating in a diminished capacity would be a useful failure mode.

    17. Re:Dumbass question by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      No City or company in there right mind will build roads, or phone systems to handle maximum similtanous usage.

      Actually there are roads built larger than they need to be for evacuation purposes. I know that's one of the big reasons for building some freeways in Florida since hurricanes are fairly common. They don't make 50 lanes of course, but evacuating the populace of a large area in a few days is one of the design constraints.

      I do agree with the grandparent post though, the underlying assumption of this article is idiotic. People expecting to contact friends to tell them they're allright in an emergency is ridiculous. But I can easily see the need for an emergency communication system for emergency workers/vehicles and 911 calls. That may mean a priority cell phone service with a smaller backup capacity (only emergency workers phones, or 911 calls would be functional until capacity is restored). Whatever the solution, It does sound like a problem worth solving.

      We had on time in one of our smaller cities - Lethbridge during Canadian Idol, you couldn't place a phone call cause everyone was trying to phone in and vote for there local boy.(he ended up winning).

      Sounds like a problem with the phone system, not of capacity. Any call in show like that should have a phone number with a special prefix so the phone system isn't overwhelmed by people calling the same number. Choke all calls to that number off at each central office and I'd bet you can solve that problem. I know radio stations do that kind of thing all the time. I don't know why a similar nationwide solution to that problem couldn't happen as well.

      --
      AccountKiller
    18. Re:Dumbass question by E8086 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing people are so used to having everything work they don't think about how it works, electricity and batteries. The wind and the rain and whatever the wind is blowing may or may not have that much effect on the signal sent by the cell phone safely tucked away in your pocket, but it will have an effect on the cell tower as it's being whipped around by the wind and random flying objects, I don't think cell towers can correct for doppler shift of the TOWER. I don't know if cell phone towers have backup power, but it can't last that long when the power lines connecting to it are blown away like a house of cards.
      Fortunately the only loss of power I've had to deal with was the blackout in Aug 2003 and then only for a few hours. For some reason I was home at the time and since I had nothing else to do I moved my fan and bigger UPS over to the tv and watched to news coverage of the blackout, interestingly being broadcast to an audience who could not watch.

      "and the infrastructure that SUPPORTS the phone"

      of course no service provider is going to build for 100% usage, they only install enough lines for average use on an average day, I'll guess 35%, so when close to 100% of the customers need to make calls, usually when something bad happens only 35% can get an open line or it creates a buffer tower's OS crashes and no one can make a call.

      I hope this doesn't sound like I'l trolling, but I heard many times of the mandatory evacualtion of New Orleans and the surrounding areas. When the governor orders the evacuation of an area when taking about a class 5 hurricare that would be a good time to listen and cover your home with enough plywood as possible and head for the hills or a designated shelter. If you don't listen you're going to be sitting on top of your house waiting for a coast guard helicopter to find you or clinging to a utility pole getting bitten by hundreds of fire ants also looking for shelter there and biting you until they win and you fall off. Yes, the LA gov said that on tv.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    19. Re:Dumbass question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure! The almighty dollar. Of course we should let people die if it will cost money to save them. You slash dotters are so predictable.

    20. Re:Dumbass question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense(hence AC), but I'm afraid I'd be a little less worried about my cell phone, internet access, even electricity, than I would be worried about food, potable water and a fricken place to stay! Sometimes ya just gotta make do before you can tell somebody about it.

    21. Re:Dumbass question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That is the dumbest question I have ever seen on Slashdot."

      No, it's not. I think it's a rather valid question with clear intent (which you probably took at raw face value and didn't think much about wrt context and purpose; instead you and others simply chose to badmouth the submitter).

      After 9/11 (mentioned in the question), cell phone capacity and emergency services were called into question; there was quite a bit of an outcry of how badly such services just crapped out. Of course, losing the antennas on top of the towers and the sheer number of people calling out was not really a forseen situation at that time.

      But that time has passed.

      With the emphasis on the possiblity of terrorist attacks, as well as the regular prevalence every few years for a hurricane to rip through huge swaths of land, these situations are not uncommon. I would even say they should be expected.

      Now, I'm not saying that the lack of capacity or the destruction of towers is incomprehensible; I'm not saying they should have withstood the hurricane and flooding. I'm saying such a situation of cell tower service being knocked out in an emergency situation has arisen before, we've been bitten once by it, and the same damn problem arises once again. Why the hell are the people down there getting screwed by a problem that is likely solvable and solvable at a reasonable cost?

      The deployment of repair or alternative services should have been met, if simply by the bare expenditures homeland security has sucked up (homeland security equipment and developments should transfer easily to all disaster and recover efforts), not to mention the handouts the telecommunications industry gets from the federal government (that tax you pay on your landline bill, circles back to the phone companies).

      Such change, however, in making available rapidly deployable telecomm equipment to disaster areas has not occurred despite all the talk and the 4 years which have pasts since 9/11. In fact, I would guess they'd largely been forgotten by most /.ers (but not by the pros) had not the submitter brought it up.

      Further, the simple fact that something is cheap does not mean that services should suck or be lost, but instead the prevalence of such equipment makes it more likely cell phones and the like could be used effectively in rescue efforts. It is quite likely people trapped in their attics who cannot punch out are trying to make calls to be rescued.

      The solutions could vary: Mini towers, deployed mobile towers, weather balloons with equipment, mini blimps deployed on site, having national guardsmen and rescue operators carry towers-in-a-backpack that can intercept nearby, local calls.

      To someone like me, people not having cell phone service with alternatives in these situations being available is horrible. In fact, to me, it would be far more understandable and excusable if we had such systems but couldn't deploy them due to lack of manpower than not seeming to even having them as an option at all.

      But then again, you probably think I'm being dumb.

    22. Re:Dumbass question by cheezus_es_lard · · Score: 1

      Actually, building a 5+ story CO/MTSO with generators on the top floor, sealed fuel tanks in the basement, batteries and equipment on the top -1 floor... eat the cost, make it ugly and windowless, and voila... with a few generators you could have a fully flood-proof and virtually hurricane-proof setup. Now, the land lines to the towers, or to the customers, they're another story, but if the majority of service could be maintained, and perhaps a RF design sufficient to cause 2+ tower reachability 90-95% of the time, I don't see why it'd be an issue. Make the fuel tanks big enough and it can run forever.

      Then when a tornado hits, tears down the building and blows up the fuel reserves, we can go 'why didn't they make the building tornado-proof?!?!

    23. Re:Dumbass question by Mike1024 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is the dumbest question I have ever seen on Slashdot.

      I disagree.

      We have the power to hold equipment to arbratry standards, and we use that power to ensure safety. For example, power plugs are required to have fuses - not for every day use, but for emergencies. Likewise, we design our medical equipment not to kill patients in the event of an emergency, we put earth bonding straps on cranes to keep people safe if someone accidentally hits the boom into a power line, and so on.

      Why don't we expand our arbratry safety standards into the realm of radio telecommunications?

      I'm no expert, but in discussions about cell tower cancer risks, one often hears that cell towers don't pump out a gigantic wattage - they just have good design, such as very high gain antennas. Compaines like APC will sell you rack-mounted datacenter UPS systems offering many hundreds of watt-hours of backup power. Backup generators are also commonplace.

      If it's possible, why don't we simply say to cell providers "You are required to provide the capacity for 99% of your customers to make one ten-minute call within 3 hours of any major emergency" as a precondition for selling them radio licenses?

      Just my $0.02,

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    24. Re:Dumbass question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because the majority of this 99% doesn't actually NEED to make a call. It's just a natural reaction in a panic situation.

    25. Re:Dumbass question by shibashaba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Grounds and fuses are put on things because that kind of stuff happens on the regular basis and is very cheap protection. You know of any structures that strech out high into the sky that are hurrican, tornado, earthquake and fire proof? Just how do you expect that to be possible? Theres a far cry from forcing cell phone companies to do something almost impossible and going bankrupt vs a fuse costing a few cents or a ground costing a few dollars.

      Before we make cell phone companies make bullet proof towers why don't we make hurrican proof houses? That would save a hell of a lot more lives. Disaster strikes and the first thing you people think about is cell phones?

      --
      ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
    26. Re:Dumbass question by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, cell towers tend to be on sides of tall hills and tops of buildings. A submerged cell tower is pretty rare, though occasionally in the boonies, you'll hear stories of telecom equipment shorting out if a drain gets clogged during heavy rain or something....

      The problem is probably not the cell towers. The problem is probably that they're trying to relay stuff via land lines, which, in turn, utilize periodic repeaters and/or go through the local central offices, which are, in turn, submerged.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    27. Re:Dumbass question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a free market solution: Let the cell providers say, "Hey, if you want us to guarantee you that you get one ten-minute call within 3 hours of any major emergency, then just pay an extra $X and we'll guarantee it."

      But, perhaps the customers will decide they don't want to pay an extra $X. In that case, the market has spoken. Customers are sovereign. There are a lot of things we'd like to have in an emergency, but all resources are finite, so consumers must make choices.

    28. Re:Dumbass question by invisigoth · · Score: 1

      The expense to house, maintain an UPS system for the many many hundreds of cell phone towers in any given city would be cost-prohibitive. Not to mention the fact that the city is under 20 feet of water. That water will of course short out any equipment no matter how fault-tolerant.

      There's just no way you could offer affordable cellular service with this level of infrastructure required to build out.

    29. Re:Dumbass question by Goody · · Score: 1

      If it's possible, why don't we simply say to cell providers "You are required to provide the capacity for 99% of your customers to make one ten-minute call within 3 hours of any major emergency" as a precondition for selling them radio licenses?

      Sure it's possible, but it's not just a capacity issue, it's also the fact that they use telco facilities more than licensed microwave these days for cellular backhaul. And many companies are skimping on emergency power systems. Cell sites used to be equipped to run for a week or two without power. Some today just have battery backup for a couple hours.

      This can be fixed, everyone just needs to be willing to pay $500 a month for their cellphone service :-)

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    30. Re:Dumbass question by Goody · · Score: 1

      That is the dumbest question I have ever seen on Slashdot.

      Ditto!

      Suprise, folks! Your $20 a month plastic device with a camera and MIDI chip isn't a high-powered worldwide NATO-certified communications system. It's a friggin cordless phone that depends on local infrastructure that needs electricity and is just as fragile as telephone lines on poles, and a system that has just enough capacity to handle calls during normal peak hours and be profitable.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    31. Re:Dumbass question by ckedge · · Score: 1

      .
      Why don't we expand our arbratry safety standards into the realm of radio telecommunications?

      Where the fuck did you get the idea that things are arbitrary? Do you even know what the fucking word means?

      Just my $0.02,

      No, it'll be $20 dumbass.

      HELLO!! MCFLY!?!? SHIT COSTS MONEY!!!!!

      dumbasses. No I'm not apologizing, where the fuck do these morons come from?
      .

    32. Re:Dumbass question by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      WW2 Submarines did... there's not a lot to a diesel generator. If you vent the exhaust and snorkel the air intake, a diesel running underwater would just run cooler. If the electricals are sealed and the cable points well-insulated (slap some sort of nonconductive goo on the bare metal bits) you could run a welder from underwater.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    33. Re:Dumbass question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the backup generators at hospitals and cell phone towers are now under water. The water is inside the engine, inside the electrics, inside the fuel tanks - I'd love to see you dive in and start one of those machines...

      BTW, a welder is a low voltage device, that is why you can weld under water.

    34. Re:Dumbass question by memojuez · · Score: 1

      True ... not to mention that their back-up generators probably wouldn't run under all that water.

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
    35. Re:Dumbass question by rkrabath · · Score: 1

      It's Interesting that something we've had the technology to do for less than 100 years has already become a "natural reaction"

      --
      Who do I have to blackmail to get some representation around here!?!?!?!?
    36. Re:Dumbass question by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Doesn't help when you need to power each tower individually. And then there is the spectrum issue.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    37. Re:Dumbass question by jrockway · · Score: 1

      That's why they have you sign 2 year contracts. I would switch, but I don't want to terminate the contract or take the credit hit of just not paying. Actually I am very close to not paying. Fuck them.

      US Cellular in Chicago. Worst network, worst service, worst phones, worst plans, worst customer service. Ever.

      --
      My other car is first.
    38. Re:Dumbass question by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      For example, cell-phone providers in Russia are required to provide backup capacity for 24 hours of service in case of blackout.

      And it doesn't really cost that much: just about $4000 per tower (battery and diesel-generator).

    39. Re:Dumbass question by finkployd · · Score: 1

      You want the real answer? Because the RF output necessary to make that happen would (1) saturate the spectrum to the point where only a few people can make calls at the same time and (2) that level of power would fry the person using the phone.

      Think 802.11b, you only have a few channels. Imagine how unrealistic it would be if you were allowed to use enough power to cover a city block. You would have room for about 3 good access points (or 11 access points that interfere with each other)

      Finkployd

    40. Re:Dumbass question by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

      "... but have you priced the towers and the infrastructure that SUPPORTS the phone?"

      I worked at an ISP that deployed wireless internet access to the town I'm in. Because of cost, we could only lease tower space. What we discovered is that many cell companies lease tower space as well, and because you pay per square-foot on the ground, many of them do not have on-site generators. They bring their generators on-site and chain them outside the fence during an outage because the tower owners do not charge any extra that way. Then, they have to drive site-to-site during an extended outage to keep the generators fuled up. This was difficult during last winter's ice storm, and pretty much impossible during a hurricane.

  8. Cellular blimps by gothzilla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember a story some time ago about a plan to deploy blimps for cell and wi-fi service. I wonder if that plan might be viable now? They could fly away for the storm then fly back shortly afterwards.

    1. Re:Cellular blimps by TGK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While it might be somewhat impracticable to put blimps up over major cities for cell coverage all the time, the use of this technology for emergancies isn't such a bad idea.

      Unfortunately, there are really two issues here. First, the ability to communicate during the disater. I'm not sure if we really need to invest too much in the problem of how to make a cell phone call during a hurricane. Evacuation is done for a reason. If you can't be bothered to leave I'm not all to sympathetic if you can't call out either.

      That said, when rescue crews start operating in the city following a catastrophe like this, we need to have a working telecommunications infrastructure. Blimps or some other form of airborn system can aid immeasurably in this.

      Of course, cell phones are only good as long as their batteries hold out. Still, solar power and a decent sat uplink can temporarily solve the infrastructure problem.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    2. Re:Cellular blimps by BluedemonX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, when the winds hit 145mph they could fly away REAL quick.

      Of course, retrieving them back from Ottawa's airspace might be tricky, what with international border disputes over softwood lumber and all.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    3. Re:Cellular blimps by jcr · · Score: 1

      They could fly away for the storm then fly back shortly afterwards.

      If they're operating at a high enough altitude, they wouldn't even need to move during the storm. 60,000 feet should do it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Cellular blimps by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that the comms blimps you're remembering are flying somewhat higher than the cloud base (ie: the stratosphere) so their flight wouldn't be affected by the storm.

      Comms, on the other hand, would likely be disrupted by all the static electricity and lightning until a storm passed by. No worse than terrestrial cellular towers, though.

    5. Re:Cellular blimps by samj · · Score: 1

      That's getting pretty close to the point where tdma stops working isn't it? Then again, don't most of you use cdma in the US?

    6. Re:Cellular blimps by lilmouse · · Score: 1
      If you can't be bothered to leave I'm not all to sympathetic if you can't call out either.
      What if you can't afford to leave (no car), and there are no services helping you evacuate? You think those 9000 people in the SuperDome were there becaue it was fun? Anyone with an SUV left town - you can be sure of that! Even at 15mph, it's hard to out-walk a hurricane.

      Also, my .02$: I don't know how fast blimps can fly, but I suspect cell-phone blimps wouldn't be outfitted with the latest in engines. Cheapest maybe, if they aren't just towed somewhere, anchored and left... Gonna make moving them in/out of affected areas slow. Useful for cleanup after the fact, but not going to be there as soon as the rescue boats can actually start moving.

      --LWM
    7. Re:Cellular blimps by ces · · Score: 1

      Of the national carriers in the US Verizon and Sprint are CDMA, Cingular and T-Mobile are GSM (Cingular has some older TDMA stuff too).

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    8. Re:Cellular blimps by jdc180 · · Score: 1

      Only in America would someone be too poor to evacuate, but be worried about their cell phone coverage.

    9. Re:Cellular blimps by Baricom · · Score: 1

      What if you can't afford to leave (no car), and there are no services helping you evacuate?

      Blame your government. Our local bus system has an evacuation plan. In the event of a disaster, the buses will pick up anyone, free of charge, along with necessary supplies like food and water, anywhere along the route (not only at stops). Here, at least, there is no excuse for not evacuating when told.

    10. Re:Cellular blimps by nxtw · · Score: 1
      60,000ft (approx 12 mi) is within range (approx 20mi max except on specially configured networks) for GSM operation, and CDMA would work fine. However,

      I'm not sure about AMPS, but I don't think TDMA would work. Since most American wireless users are on GSM or CDMA, this isn't a problem. Assuming there are no other factors, and that the earth is flat, such a system would work for a radius of approx. 16 miles on the ground, an area of approx. 800 sq mi. I would expect it to be unlikely that an area that large would be covered, however. Such a system could cause interference with networks outside of the affected area, and depending on the population & attempted usage of the area, may get crowded fairly quickly.

    11. Re:Cellular blimps by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

      Verizon and Sprint have mobil Cell Towers on trucks. However even that is limited when the entire area is flooded.

    12. Re:Cellular blimps by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Cingular's TDMA stuff is the stuff they inherited from AT&T Wireless.

      (begin rant):

      Things have gone downhill.

      I have trouble hearing people.
      People have trouble hearing me.
      Calls get dropped often.
      In some places they get dropped all the time!
      In other places it is so hard for me or the other party to hear that it is completely worthless.
      A (likely reconditioned) phone they gave me has a bad # key. Often does nothing or gives you a 9 instead.
      "No service" error is common.
      Fast busy signals are common.
      "Your call cannot be completed" messages are common.
      511 calls (traffic info) very often don't get through - fast busys and error messages.
      Lost text messages are common.
      Occasionally text messages are duplicated, sometimes multiple times.
      Sometimes the phone says "Text message not sent" - no idea why - I am in the service area
      Directory assistance (411 and 555-1212) is redirected to them - they often drop the call, don't know the number for a business which definitely is listed, and often give you the number for some other business instead!
      611 would often drop calls
      Billing is a nightmare - if you got a credit, e.g. for a bad 411 call (see above) the billing computer deducted that from the bill, but not from what it thinks you need to pay. Your next bill says you are deliquent (happened to me twice, also happened to someone else I know) and sometimes they won't believe you until you explain it to the point it gets through their thick skull.
      One whole city I went to would have constant dropped calls and very hard to hear people at best.
      People get my voicemail even when my phone is on and it never rings even though the ring is turned on - no missed calls show on the phone. Often they'll get voicemail immediately without even more than one ring - and I am in the service area.
      To get a GSM phone I'll need to pay money up front and not have it one the bill. Also a 2 year agreement (see above for why that doesn't exactly appeal to me) to get a price which isn't outragious. A 1 year agreement would be less hard to swallow.

      Should I switch and to who?

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    13. Re:Cellular blimps by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      I heard about an installation of balloon equipment. They were able to winch down the balloons and get the equipment off them, but the balloons were just too big to be taken anywhere (couldn't fly away either, they were just tethered). But it's not a terrible idea.

    14. Re:Cellular blimps by ces · · Score: 1

      Much of that is probably due to more and more channels and towers being turned over to GSM service. The same thing was likely to happen even if ATTWS didn't get bought out.

      Should I switch and to who?

      Yes, I'd go with T-Mobile if you only need service in urban areas. If you need service way out in the boonies, check the coverage maps to make sure the areas you need to go to have coverage.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    15. Re:Cellular blimps by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Here's what I don't get. Amtrak runs trains up and down from Chicago to New Orleans on a daily basis, and also to someplace in New York. Do you really mean to tell me that they couldn't have gotten every one of those tourists out of New Orleans and surrounding areas? Even if they only have two trains to do it, you fill them, go an hour inland, dump everybody, run back, repeat.

      No, what we have here is a bunch of companies that could have helped but chose to sit on their asses. Two choice quotes from comments at http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2005/08/kat rina_a_terri.html:

      Amtrak crapped out on us - closing up shop and shooing all their paying passengers out of the building - telling all passengers who were/are in New Orleans to transfer to other trains that we have to fend for ourselves. No emergency assistance - no emergency transportation to catch other trains or (at least) get us out of town - no emergency assistance to get us a place to stay.
      ...but the thing that really ticks me off is that amtrak closed up shop and activated a law loophole that would prevent the louisiana [sic] goverment from useing [sic] there trains to evacuate innocent people from louisiana [sic] especially new orleans [sic]. and just when you thought amtrak [sic] couldn't sink any lower.
      Personally, I'd like to see the heads of Amtrak and other companies that could have helped but didn't brought up on charges of aiding and abetting involuntary manslaughter.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re:Cellular blimps by geekoid · · Score: 1

      haha, you trying to be funny right? as oppossed to showing how incredibly ignorant of what altitude these blimps would operate at, right?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Cellular blimps by malakai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, while Amtrak is not a government agency, it is wholly owned ( 100% of it's stock is owned by the Federal government ) so I'm going to call BS on this story. It would have taken two phone calls MAX from a Lousianna Senator to allow Amtrak trains to be commendeered for evacutation.

      My guess is, they didn't feel the need for it. As they knew the capactity of the Superdome + the nine orther emergency locations would not be exceeded. In fact, in the end, only about 10k went to the Superdome. It can hold 80k for an event.

      That may turn out to be a bad decision, but not because people couldn't get Amtrak to play ball. The board is federally controlled, and they require the US Federal Governemnt to approve their budget each year. The US Govt has Amtrak by the balls, for better or worse.

    18. Re:Cellular blimps by ShaggyBOFH · · Score: 1
      You whiny liberal little f**k. Why don't you jump your arse in your soybean burning VW hippie mobile and drive as many out as you can. Because that would cost YOU money?

      I look forward to seeing your face on Americas most wanted prick for not saving as many as you could.

      _______

      --
      --- Just say no to negativity.
    19. Re:Cellular blimps by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      Why not just go for the whole geostationary satellite and be done with it?

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    20. Re:Cellular blimps by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      You whiny liberal little f**k. Why don't you jump your arse in your soybean burning VW hippie mobile and drive as many out as you can. Because that would cost YOU money?

      Wow. I'm flattered. Around here, I'm considered conservative.

      Here's a few reasons to start with:

      1. It would take three days to get there from here by car. There was not a three day warning between when they knew which way the storm would go and when it hit.
      2. Even if there had been, it would be completely financially unreasonable for me to go such a long distance when there were plenty of able-bodied people on the scene locally.
      3. I would also be one extra person and vehicle taking up space and slowing down evacuation efforts. Adding people into a crisis situation is, by far, the dumbest thing you can possibly do during an emergency. If you knew anything about emergency management, you would know that.
      4. I don't make money hauling people. I don't have a responsibility to avoid stranding who already paid me for a ride. Amtrak does. If I drove a bus, I would be trying to get as many as possible of my paying customers the heck out. It's the right thing to do.
      5. My Ford minivan holds 6 people. An Amtrak train holds several hundred. They have infrastructure to handle a mass evacuation.
      6. The roads were already so overcrowded that additional motor vehicle traffic would never be able to get to safety. In effect, I would be putting myself unnecessarily into harm's way with absolutely no possibility of helping ANYONE. Trains, by contrast, were easily able to get into and out of the area.
      In the unlikely event a hurricane comes to my part of Northern California, I'll be one of the first people out there helping get people out of the affected area as best I can. That said, unless I am -in- the critical zone, I probably won't be able to enter that area. Even then, I won't be able to do a heck of a lot because I don't have infrastructure designed to handle that and will likely not be able to reenter the area after taking the first load out. I will, however, do my part to the best of my ability, and will expect the local bus/train services to do likewise.

      They who are in the best position financially and physically to help are morally and ethically (and in some cases, legally) obligated to do so. Sorry you don't like that, but it's generally the law here in the U.S. If I see someone dying on the street and I know CPR and don't try to help, I can be held legally liable for that person's death. If I attempt to help, even unsuccessfully, I am in no way liable. In so doing, if Amtrak had run even one single extra run of their trains to help people evacuate, they would be legally in the clear, albeit perhaps not morally or ethically. But they didn't even do that, so far as anyone has heard.

      Welcome to the real world, you selfish little weasel.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  9. One for the "This is an outrage!" crowd... by jav1231 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WTF do people expect? Millions of people displaced and each having at least one relative and likely several in other parts of the world trying to reach them. This is to be expected. Why should a network outage and phone difficulties be news in such a catastrophy?

    1. Re:One for the "This is an outrage!" crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can do the math to calculate what is to be expected, then the question is "why can't the infrastructure planners do the same?".

      Else, if the telecommunication companies don't care if their system doesn't work during a crisis, then "WTF?"

    2. Re:One for the "This is an outrage!" crowd... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Telecommunication companies do not expect their systems to work under such an extreme load. The infrastructure planners were doing their jobs by figuring out how to provide service to the most likely volumes of traffic at the lowest cost. Do you think these companies exist to help people? They exist to make money. They do this by charging people as much as they can for services and paying as little as possible for the resources to provide the services.

    3. Re:One for the "This is an outrage!" crowd... by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      During the cold war, radio antennae were designed to be retracted underground in antipication of a nuclear strike, and to have a motor strong enough to push their way through several foot of rubble after the blast

      If you could combine this concept with a wind power generator, you could have more a resilient network - Suppose cell phone towers could have a wind speed monitor and shutdown if the wind speed exceeded a certain limit, rather than wait to be knocked down in a blizzard or a storm?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:One for the "This is an outrage!" crowd... by fourtyfive · · Score: 1

      "They exist to make money. They do this by charging people as much as they can for services and paying as little as possible for the resources to provide the services." You say this like its an awful thing... Last time I checked, this is how almost all businesses worked... Keep your margin high and sell a lot of it. How is that so "evil"?

    5. Re:One for the "This is an outrage!" crowd... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      No, I say that as if it were a common trait. I was responding to 'Else, if the telecommunication companies don't care if their system doesn't work during a crisis, then "WTF?"
      ', which seems to presume companies should care about providing services in an extreme case.

    6. Re:One for the "This is an outrage!" crowd... by ckedge · · Score: 1

      And the company that implements this and charges TRIPLE the competitors rate is going to get business from your friends HOW? By saying "if a hurricane strikes"... what? They'll more easily be able to tell grandma smith that they're one of the 99.999% of people who are still alive?

    7. Re:One for the "This is an outrage!" crowd... by Ian+Peon · · Score: 1

      I was amazed this morning when my wife was able to reach her father via landline (he lives down the end of Church Street, and stocked up on ammo instead of evacuating - sigh). Power was out, so none of his wireless phones worked, so he plugged in an old rotery phone, and it worked!

      He lost his roof and chimney, but has no flooding.

  10. That's not surprising... by artemis67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I live in Charlotte, NC, and it's often difficult to place a cell phone call during rush hour traffic here. If we had a major disaster, no doubt the same thing would happen to us. The cell phone networks obviously were only designed to support a small fraction of the total number of cell phone users in the area at any given time.

    1. Re:That's not surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The cell phone networks obviously were only designed to support a small fraction of the total number of cell phone users in the area at any given time.

      I manage call center systems for an insurance company. We do not have sufficient capacity or staff to handle simultaneous calls from all 800,000 of our customers at once. Duh.

    2. Re:That's not surprising... by Cromac · · Score: 1
      The cell phone networks obviously were only designed to support a small fraction of the total number of cell phone users in the area at any given time.

      Just like every dialup ISP. They don't have enough modems/phone lines or IP address for every one of their customers to call in at the same time. As I recall they only generally have enough capacity for around 20% at any given time. It isn't surprising that cell companies do the same thing.

  11. Round up of New Orleans News Sources by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 4, Informative

    -Crow T. Trollbot

    1. Re:Round up of New Orleans News Sources by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot. Thats my home town....those are some good links.

    2. Re:Round up of New Orleans News Sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, check out www.wdsu.com, as far as I can tell they are the only new station streaming live coverage with live shots and continually updated information.

    3. Re:Round up of New Orleans News Sources by Kremit · · Score: 1

      I posted a torrent of that helicopter flyover here:

      http://wrpn.net/~kremit/files/wgno26flyover.wmv.to rrent

  12. ET: Electric Terrestrial by kyouteki · · Score: 1

    What do you expect if the entire infrastructure is land-based copper, and most of everything else is heavily damaged as well?

    RF isn't a great answer, either, not as a viable backup for the entire tellecommunications infrastructure, because you only have so much bandwidth in the air before you start frying people with microwave, and the FCC isn't likely to open up frequencies, even in times of emergency like this. That's not to mention electricity distrobution.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:ET: Electric Terrestrial by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      This is why you decide to give emergecy RF service to people who need it to do their jobs (eg. law enforcement and search and rescue) and leave everyone else to wait until regualr service is restored. As mentioned elsewhere this is where the Red Cross and amateur radio volunteers come into play. There is really no need for everyone in the effected area to have telecommunications service immediately following a disaster and their is plenty of RF bandwidth for those who do need it to get it.

  13. I've got a friend by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    who's evacuated out of state and has a cell phone with long distance service, but people are having problems calling TO him. Presumably because the call is still trying to get to New Orleans to figure out where to forward his phone call.

    1. Re:I've got a friend by greythax · · Score: 1

      Ha, that's nothing, I live in NE Louisiana and have a family member who lives in Texas. Every time I try to call her using my land line, I get an "all circuits are busy" message. Hopefully it will slack off by this evening.

    2. Re:I've got a friend by VoiceOfSanity · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is unfortunately true. The reason for this is simple: The network tries to route the call first to the area code where the cell phone was registered. Seeing it listed as 504 (for New Orleans) causes the system to try and go to New Orleans first to see if it can connect. With the existing network in tatters the response back is a failure, which instead of making the call do a search to see where the phone is, gets routed to either a message saying 'all circuits are busy' or 'due to the hurricane in the area, your call cannot be completed.'

      I talked with a Cingular tech, and he says that the situation is that they are trying to set up the network to find the phone anywhere, but it may be some time before they have it up and running. I'm sure that other cell phone companies are rushing to do the same, so that they can provide connectivity to those who have fled the area and need to call folks to let them know they're alive and safe.

    3. Re:I've got a friend by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Not quite no. There are database systems that are used to figure out where a phone is. It is called RADIUS. If the phone is switched on, the system will know its position.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    4. Re:I've got a friend by Gobelet · · Score: 1

      Well that's the case for GSM communications. Every call gets rerouted from your base emitting station. For example the first time my phone was powered on and my SIM card activated, I was near Monaco (next to Nice, France). Since then I can call Monaco without the international code, thus saving money if I call there. And I pay the normal fee while calling French landlines or mobiles. From anywhere (in France, at least)

    5. Re:I've got a friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Hancock county, MS (possibly the area hardest hit)- or at least I did, we'll see if my apartment is still standing.

      Anyway, everyone I work with has cell phones out of Gulfport. None of our phones can get calls no matter what state we're in (well away from the disaster), but we can call out on them.

    6. Re:I've got a friend by gleffler · · Score: 1

      I'm still *in* the state, but people are having problems calling me, and I'm in a rather weird scenario right now too. My phone (area code 502) is currently located in area code 318 (north/east LA.) If one of my friends from 502 tries to call my phone (again, a 502 number) they get some sort of T-Mobile recorded message that the call could not be completed due to the hurricane. However, if I try to call my cell phone from another 318 number, it works fine. I'm puzzled.

      I do have to give kudos to T-Mo for their infrastructure only being down for about 12 hours after the hurricane hit, despite it wreaking havoc over half the state. I was impressed, I was expecting Louisiana to be without phone service for weeks.

  14. A communications disruption... by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...could mean only one thing - invasion.

    1. Re: A communications disruption... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      wow! the mods certainly are on crack... how could they miss the Episode 1 reference? It was funny people. Laugh. :)

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  15. Obvious Answer: Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In this age dominated by eggheads from Stanford and elsewhere, we have been suckered into believing that only high tech can provide the answers. Unfortunately, in the face of a hurricane with flash flooding and solar storms (blinding the satellites), high-tech routers simply do not work under 6 feet of water.

    The answer is a very low-tech solution: ham radio powered by batteries. A ham radio at the Artic Circle or in the jungles of the Amazon rain forest works consistently and reliably. The only way that a ham radio could fail is the total disappearance of the ionosphere, which allows ham radios to bounce their signals across the globe.

  16. Re:Yet another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to live in either place, in northern Chicago, we've never even had a tornado, much less strong earthquake or hurricane.

  17. so that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That thanks to the red cross i can download porn in hurricane stricken areas?

  18. amateur radio is alive and well in New Orleans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.arrl.org/
    Amateur Radio Volunteers Involved in Katrina Recovery (Aug 30, 2005) -- Amateur Radio Emergency Service (ARES) volunteers in Louisiana are engaged in the Hurricane Katrina recovery effort, and more are waiting in the wings to help as soon as they can enter storm-ravaged zones. Winds and flooding from the huge storm wreaked havoc in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama after Katrina came ashore early Monday, August 29. Louisiana ARES Section Emergency Coordinator Gary Stratton, K5GLS, told ARRL that some 250 ARES members have been working with the Red Cross and the state's Office of Homeland Security Emergency Preparedness. Much of the affected areas remain flooded and dangerous, however. As a result, state officials have not allowed emergency or other units to enter the flooded zones, and there is still no communication with many coastal areas.

  19. Why? by FlameTroll · · Score: 0

    Because maybe, just maybe, things like medical care, water, food, shelter, and clothing take priority? Just a guess...

    --
    A simple Troll, born of Rock and Fire, leaving in the basement of my parents volcano and typing on an asbestos keyboard.
  20. from the blatantly obvious department ... by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

    why can't all the people of a city make contact during an emergency?

    Phone networks are engineered for predicted average demand. This level is occasionally exceeded during regular use. The demand for communications during an event such as hurricane Katrina skyrockets. To build a network capable of satisfying these peak demands would multiply the average user's bill, and few people would sign up.

    Quite simple, really.

    1. Re:from the blatantly obvious department ... by rcamera · · Score: 1

      but if fewer people signed up, it would be easier to handle the absolute maximum...

      --
      Wave upon wave of demented avengers March cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream
    2. Re:from the blatantly obvious department ... by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      Precisely. This same sort of thing happened to everybody at a rock concert recently. It was out in a rural area of Massachusetts where it's mostly college kids (thus, not everybody even has a cellphone) and when it came time to leave, only a limited number of people could get a call through, because the tower(s?) were unable to handle it all.

    3. Re:from the blatantly obvious department ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, did they all get out? who rescued them?

  21. No! Technology has saved lives.... by geddes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Technology can certainly help us in times of need. The Mayor of New Orleans was able to order an evacuation, through the great telecommunication and media infrastructures that we have, people were able to be warned, which probably saved thousands of lives. I say this, because when natural disasters like this hit third world countries, there are many, many, many more deaths. So our communications infrastructure and other technologies DO HELP. Of course, we have had television and radio and the like for a while, an evacuation and warning like this would have been possible probably even 40 years ago. This catagory of technology would also include things like interstate highways, helicopters, boats, and the like, which help rescue operations get where they are needed. Another development we have that helps is a highly organized and functional government. George Bush can immediately grant disaster funding to these states and the rescue operations get moving. Without government direction and organization, it would take whatever volunteer goodwill organizations that go down there a lot longer to coordinate their efforts, and would be much less effective. It is true that the cell phones stop working when the power is cut to the tower, but the same is true for regular phones. But, the amazing thing is, to restore phone service we can fly a couple satellites, which is a lot easier than waiting for the water to recede and rebuild all the phone lines. So technology is helping in this case as well. A disaster like this does show us how powerful nature is, and that sometimes there is nothing we can do to stop a disaster, but we can do our best to minimize the tragedy.

    1. Re:No! Technology has saved lives.... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      So our communications infrastructure and other technologies DO HELP. Of course, we have had television and radio and the like for a while, an evacuation and warning like this would have been possible probably even 40 years ago.

      40 years ago propagating the warning would have been possible. But the accurate prediction of the size and path of the hurricaine would not.

      Over that period satellites and supercomputers have produced a ramp-up in the accuracy of weather forcasting and a significant extension of the time into the future that it retains some accuracy - along with a good measure of HOW far into the future it will hold in any given situation.

      Forty years back it was really fuzzy. We're bumping up against the chaos limit now, where the accuracy and length of predictions is limited mainly by the density and accuracy of the measurements and the stability of the underlying weather systems in the face of small perturbations. With the current sensors that's good for maybe three to seven days depending on the situation - and it was nearly right on several days in advance on this one.

      That means people can have several days of RELIABLE warnings via that 40-year-old communication infrastructure. B-) No more concern that wolf is being cried, or that a threat is being underplayed because authorities fear creating more damage by overblowing the warning than the actual threat would cause.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:No! Technology has saved lives.... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Would you want to evacuate know that everything you own will be flattened or washed away by the storm?

      You leave, but there is nothing to ever go back to.

      It is hard to leave knowing that you'll never be able to go back or that there will be nothing there but the slab your house was built on (which is the case for many).

      At least if you are there you know what is happening.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    3. Re:No! Technology has saved lives.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without government direction and organization, it would take whatever volunteer goodwill organizations that go down there a lot longer to coordinate their efforts, and would be much less effective.

      Please read the following:

      In a Crisis, Markets More than Ever

    4. Re:No! Technology has saved lives.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you want to evacuate know that everything you own will be flattened or washed away by the storm?

      Is that a trick question? Of course I would evacuate! There will always be time to collect more material things, and even if there wasn't, why would I want to die with the material things I have? Is life worthless without them?

      And why is the GP marked flamebait for speaking the truth? There are few things sadder than children dying because their parents are stuck on stupid. People, who could have left, but ignored warnings and died, should win Darwin Awards. Usually, I wouldn't be so heartless, but these people wasted the time of rescue workers.

    5. Re:No! Technology has saved lives.... by ka9cql · · Score: 1
      It is true that the cell phones stop working when the power is cut to the tower, but the same is true for regular phones.

      Regular phones do not stop working when the power is cut. The telephone network has been running on 48 volts of power forever, because that is the voltage produced by 4 12-volt batteries wired in series.

      All telephone central offices (CO's) are backed up by a huge rack of 12-volt batteries, wired up in groups of four, to provide the DC voltages necessary for the telephone system to survive the loss of commercial power. Many CO's even have an 18-wheeler trailer parked on their grounds that contains one (if not two) diesel electric generators for longer term backup power. Many of these trailers are swapped out every 6 or 12 months with a newly-refurbished unit while the existing one goes off for routine maintenance.

      Those of us in the telecommunications industry (pre-deregulation) took our jobs seriously, had established disaster plans, recovery procedures, and loss-of-life prevention measures in place 24x7x365. You could count on the phone company's equipment to withstand the worst that mother nature could throw at it, (including being fully submerged in water!). Our equipment could survive almost everything short of a direct nuclear blast. Post-deregulation, it's becoming less common, but it's still the rule rather than the exception.

      Cell phones are not meant to be a prime-time communications device. They were intended to be nothing more than a convenience and a luxury. Unfortunately, risking your life on the ability of such a "convenience" to get your 911 call through is playing russian roulette with your life.

    6. Re:No! Technology has saved lives.... by geddes · · Score: 1

      Point well taken. When I said that I had the phone lines themselves in mind, if they get blown down, then phone service goes out. I didn't know they worked submerged in water though, that is way cool!

  22. Money to be made here by MooseTick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems like Verizon, Sprint or someone could make a boatload of money from opportunities like this. They could have a few mobile cell towers that run from generators. When a tornado, hurricane, wind storms, or whatever hit, they truck those towers in as temporary replacements. The local government will appreciate it. The local cell phone users will appreciate it. The people not on their plan will make them a bundle in roaming fees!

    They could store them centrally inthe country. Since they usually have a large warning, they could get them nearby the pending storm. Right after the storm clears, instant tower.

    3. Profit

    1. Re:Money to be made here by nekonoko · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Money to be made here by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      As has already been pointed out cell sites on wheels do exist. The problem is cell sites still need landlines hooked up to them to provide service.

    3. Re:Money to be made here by pg110404 · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is probably in bad taste, but why did I have an image of that "can you hear me now?" guy in a rowboat going down the streets of new orleans?

    4. Re:Money to be made here by Incadenza · · Score: 2, Informative
      It seems like Verizon, Sprint or someone could make a boatload of money from opportunities like this. They could have a few mobile cell towers that run from generators. When a tornado, hurricane, wind storms, or whatever hit, they truck those towers in as temporary replacements.

      You mean like COLTs (Cell on Light Trucks)? This seems like prior art to me:

      Rapid Disaster Response - COLTs
      Verizon Wireless "Cell on Light Trucks" (COLTs) can process thousands of calls every hour in the event cell sites or other key communications equipment are damaged or disabled by a community disaster. The 25,000 pound vehicle features two retractable masts, a microwave antenna to link network components, an emergency power generator and a small office. The COLT is also fully equipped with resources needed during emergencies including equipment, fuel, electrical generators, food, water and cots.

    5. Re:Money to be made here by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Not in this case. The water is still rising. People are still being evacuated.
      If conditions are such that you can't run the regular towers, you probably can't get in to set up mobile ones. Unless you drop floating ones in by chopper.

      If the water had already receded, they could run the regular towers off generators, and not need the mobiles.

      Some sort of non-ground based comm is necessary.

    6. Re:Money to be made here by dougmc · · Score: 2, Informative
      It seems like Verizon, Sprint or someone could make a boatload of money from opportunities like this.
      Ok, let's assume that Verizon has a fleet of mobile cell towers with generators, solar powered blimp repeaters, etc. all ready to go to New Orleans on a moment's notice.

      In order to make a boatload of money, somebody would have to pay for it. Who would pay?

      Sure, the service would be worth paying for, but Verizon would immediately be accused of price gouging if they tried to actually get somebody to pay for it. Everybody would expect the `enhanced' service to be provided for free.

      How would you react if you were a Verizon customer and your phone, which hadn't worked before, rang, and it was Verizon offering to make your phone work again for the next three days for only $29.95? Just give your credit card! It might be a bargain, it might even save your life and many other lives, but the outcry against it would be enormous.

      I do see how this would be useful, but unless the governments have already made some sort of deal to fund this sort of thing in advance, I don't see where a boatload of money could be made. In fact, all I see is an opportunity to provide service for free -- which gets them a lot of good karma and brownie points, but it's often hard to take that to the bank.

    7. Re:Money to be made here by Joe+Random · · Score: 1

      But couldn't you have a string of portable towers acting as repeaters to move the signal out to a location that does have functioning landlines?

    8. Re:Money to be made here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those have been around at least since September 2001. I also recall Verizon made all pay phone calls free for that day.

    9. Re:Money to be made here by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      You could do that but it would add quite a bit of latency and decrease call volume quite a bit. Bottom line is that it's not needed nor is it profitable so it's unlikely you'll see cell companies doing this.

    10. Re:Money to be made here by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      They already have these (called COWs for Cell On Wheels) and the units are probably en-route.

    11. Re:Money to be made here by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      As has already been pointed out cell sites on wheels do exist. The problem is cell sites still need landlines hooked up to them to provide service.

      Actually they are already set up to use microwave T carriers. A T1 can carry 24 calls (or 23 plus control info) and several can go over one antenna. A T3 can carry 28 T1s, about 45 Mbps of data, or any mix, and you can pipe that over a microwave dish, too.

      Cell towers in remote locations already hook into the rest of the net via microwave links rather than landlines. Of course the existing cell-sites-on-wheels have the antennas too.

      Any bets on whether they also carry a kit for installing the other end of the link at a suitable live landline office location when there isn't already an antenna pointed at a dead site that can be re-aimed?

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    12. Re:Money to be made here by photon317 · · Score: 1


      I would assume most major telcos already operate mobile emergency telecomms operations. I know when I worked at MCI/Worldcom, they owned similar equipment, which I saw some presentation about, but never got to see in person.

      Eighteen-wheelers full of temporary land-line and cellular switching equipment with satellite linkup capability and generators that they would roll out to disaster areas. I'm not sure whether they made any money off of it.

      I can only speculate about the money side of it, however I would imagine they don't charge anything at the time when they roll it out, it's more about saving lives at that point. But they may get to charge back some of the operating costs to FEMA or something afterwards, or perhaps state/federal emergency management funds pay them up front to maintain the capability or something.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    13. Re:Money to be made here by metallic · · Score: 1

      Most of the major cellphone companies already have cell towers that they can tow by truck and quickly deploy. The problem with the situation in New Orleans is that all roads in and out of the city are currently closed and most of the city is currently underwater.

      You also have to roll out additional towers throughout the state. I live in Shreveport, LA and I am currently having a hard time getting through on my cellphone. I'm also getting an automated message that it will cost me $2.99 a minute to check my voicemail.

      --
      Karma: Positive. Mostly effected by cowbell.
    14. Re:Money to be made here by jeaton · · Score: 1

      Verizon does have exactly such things. They're called COWs (cell-on-wheels) and COLTs (cell-on-light-trucks).

      After 9/11, Verizon rolled out COWs around ground zero to support cell use by rescue workers. For details, read http://files.ctia.org/pdf/CTIA_NRIC_0911.pdf
      .

    15. Re:Money to be made here by adolf · · Score: 1

      These exist. Their sole reason for being is to help out during natural disasters, and provide temporary capacity when people are gathering in rural areas (large festivals, for example).

      The problems, as it seems:

      Where do you park it?
      How do you get it there?
      Once there, who are you going to talk to? (Clearly a cell tower, electromagnetically in the middle of nowhere, does not provide effective communications unless it, itself, can reach the outside world.)

      If it isn't alive yet, it's either because there aren't enough to go around, or it is otherwise impossible. And if it's impossible, it's, well, impossible. So there.

      As far as making money: Nope. If you're a Verizon/Spring/Cingular/blah customer, and in your home area, they're not going to get an extra cent out of you, expensive temporary cellsite or not, unless you're into overtime on your plan. Hurricane or not, contracts still apply.

    16. Re:Money to be made here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No that was actually funny because you made fun of the telco's rather than the tragedy of the people affected.

    17. Re:Money to be made here by MullerMn · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, the phone companies here in the UK use these to provide increased coverage for events attracting large numbers of people.

      I have just returned from this year's Reading Rock Festival, and they always have a mobile cell tower set up just outside and angled to cover the festival site.

    18. Re:Money to be made here by hywel_ap_ieuan · · Score: 1
      Eighteen-wheelers full of temporary land-line and cellular switching equipment with satellite linkup capability and generators that they would roll out to disaster areas. I'm not sure whether they made any money off of it.

      I used to work for AT&T's Network Disaster Recovery organization. As you can see at http://www.att.com/ndr they've got about 100 of those trailers. The catch, with respect to the current disaster, is that they're mostly for recovering long distance, not local service. And without the local infrastructure, there's not much traffic to get in or out of the area.

      Some of my former co-workers are trying to recover one metro New Orleans location even now, but there's not much they can do for the city proper. They're probably operating the Emergency Communications Vans at some shelters (see picture at http://www.att.com/ndr/humanitarian_relief.html/) to allow people to call out, but the need is so great that even at max capacity, they aren't going to have a huge impact.

      (Personal boast: I led the design and installation for the Frame Relay, ATM, and IP trailers.)

  23. A Rather Prescient Article by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually it is worse than that. They didn't predict the breach of two levees, which are still allowing water to fill the city.

      They need to take some lessons from the Dutch.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    2. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm gonna be blunt, and people can mod it flamebait if they like, but the fact that people live on a flood plain that has sunk because groundwater has been pumped out on a coastline that gets hammered with multiple hurricanes a year, with REALLY BIG F**KING ONES every century or so ought to be a hint that maybe this isn't the best place to have a city. Now maybe before the next near-hit happens, we'll have the technology to build uber-levees and dams, but one has to ask oneself, isn't it cheaper to relocate the city and say "Wow, those bloody Frenchmen were pretty goddamn stupid."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. Why do people live where there are hurricanes or earthquakes and fires.
      Then I thought that most people live somewhere where disasters can happen. Of course I'm still not sure why people keep moving there.
      I looked in an almanac and saw that N.O. had a pop drop in the last few years.
      Luckely I live in the best place in the world(tm). Only ice storms occur here.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    4. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by xlv · · Score: 4, Funny
      but one has to ask oneself, isn't it cheaper to relocate the city and say "Wow, those bloody Frenchmen were pretty goddamn stupid."

      Well maybe the French weren't that stupid after all: they did manage to relocate while unloading Louisiana onto the US...

    5. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 1

      Do you propose that they move to mountainous areas (prone to landslides in torrential rains) or flatlands (prone to cat 5 tornados that appear with little to no notice)?

      Anywhere you go, you're going to find natural disasters.

    6. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by ces · · Score: 1

      Um, I take it you haven't been to New Orleans ...

      Having been there I can say that I'm sure the city will be rebuilt one way or another.

      Now some of the outlying communities will likely be abandoned, mostly because the hurricane washed everything, including the land, away.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    7. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Of course not. They should move to the San Andreas Fault like everybody else.

      rj

    8. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by jafac · · Score: 1

      Well, the end of a major waterway that cuts across the heart of the North American Continent, a waterway that connects most of America's major industry and agriculture, seems to be a pretty good place for a seaport if you ask me.

      Not having contingencies in place for the flooding? Sure. Bad idea. Can't disagree with any of that.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    9. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by westlake · · Score: 1
      the fact that people live on a flood plain that has sunk because groundwater has been pumped out on a coastline that gets hammered with multiple hurricanes a year, with REALLY BIG F**KING ONES every century or so ought to be a hint that maybe this isn't the best place to have a city

      You build a deep water port where you can land an ocean-going vessel, ideally, at the mouth of a navigable river with deep penetration inland. Geography defines what is possible, not what is safe.

      The natural flow of trade through the central United States is defined by the Ohio, Missouri, and Mississippi rivers, with the terminus at New Orleans.

    10. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A big part of the New Orleans problem is that the levees have been abused. There is a plan on the table where they would have started intentionally flooding the wetlands around New Orleans from the Mississippi and start depositing mud there and building them up so they are a better buffer from storms. Not sure about pumping the ground water but the soil in the region is alluvial and its natural for it to sink. It was OK when the Mississippi flooded it routinely and deposited fresh silt on it to keep building it back up. Unfortunately the Army Corps of Engineers undid this natural restoration on a large scale with levees and flood control. Something about the hubris of man seems appropriate in this case. Of course this solution doesn't work for the city of New Orleans. It is probably a doomed city unless you spend billions constantly building up the levees, and the levees are very vulnerable to the increasingly intense Hurricanes in the region. Its going to continue sinking due to the nature of the soil under it, you can't flood it to naturally replenish it with silt, the sea level is going to continue rising due to global warming. You have to wonder if maybe this event isn't an indicator that it should be abandoned and relocated to a site with a more viable long term future.

      There is also some karma in play here that an intense hurricane which was probably intensified by CO2 induced global warming, thanks to abnormally warm temperatures in the Atlantic and Gulf, would lead to devastation in Louisiana which is at the heart of the oil and gas part of the fossil fuel industry in the U.S. and is responsible for much of America's CO2 pollution capacity.

      --
      @de_machina
    11. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually those French did pretty well for themselves. The French quarters is one of the few areas above sea level and one of the few areas that did not get destroyed. It's everyone else who was damn stupid to build a city below sea level.

      I took a geology class last semester just for fun and the prof spent no less than 45 minutes discussing what a death trap New Orleans would be in the event it was ever hit by a huricane. Looks like he was right, not that I ever doubted him.

    12. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by KoshClassic · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that I'd join you in ridiculing the poor folks in New Orleans, only I'm sure that a few moments afterwards the ground here in California would start shaking beneath me and swallow me whole.

      Seriously, I grant you that large hurricanes tend to be much worse than other natural disasters, and I think that it would be great to simply not inhabbit these areas, but where would you build that is not prone to natural disasters of one sort or another? Its really a matter of choosing your poison.

      Almost every location in this country is prone to earthquakes (California), tornadoes (great plains areas especially), flooding from periodic large storms (the west coast frequently), blizzards, wildfires etc. Where would you go that doesn't have some predisposition to one sort of natural disaster or another?

      To truely deal with the hurricane threat by not living in danger prone areas, no habitation could occur probably within 20 miles of the entire Gulf coast or the entire Atlantic coast at least as far north as the Carolinas (I only say this because - I think - farther north the colder water tends to prevent the truely monster sized hurricanes - not that I'd want to deal even with a large tropical storm). Maybe if the country were just being started today, it might be pratical to avoid building in these areas. But how could such a situation pratically come to pass now that these areas are in fact so built up? (as an asside, i note that the scary thing is that with melting glaciers and rising ocean waters, we might have to do this anyway, and for the west coast too.)

      --
      Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
    13. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by fyoder · · Score: 1
      Now maybe before the next near-hit happens, we'll have the technology to build uber-levees and dams...

      Actually, a lot could have been done with existing technology. But it wasn't. It's not that the people of New Orleans are stupid. But it takes money.

      From thesimon.com.

      What I find most troubling about the devastation, however, is that some of it was preventable. In February of this year, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers announced it had "identified millions of dollars in flood and hurricane protection projects in the New Orleans district." Projects that would strengthen infrastructure for storms such as the one bearing down on the United States right now. Projects that would bolster New Orleans from hurricanes and flooding.

      Projects that were never enacted because of President Bush's budget cuts.

      I suppose the city could be relocated, but that wouldn't exactly be cheap. Probably cheaper to develop a real commitment to investing in infrastructure and protecting that infrastructure.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    14. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by glitchvern · · Score: 0
      There is also some karma in play here that an intense hurricane which was probably intensified by CO2 induced global warming, thanks to abnormally warm temperatures in the Atlantic and Gulf, would lead to devastation in Louisiana which is at the heart of the oil and gas part of the fossil fuel industry in the U.S. and is responsible for much of America's CO2 pollution capacity.

      Hurricanes are powered by the differential in temperature between the water and the atmosphere. Since global warming increases the temperature of both the water and air the affects on hurricanes are small compared to the natural variablity of hurricanes according to NOAA's faq. Here is NOAA's page listing the number of tropical storms, hurricanes, and major hurricanes going back to 1850. The data from 1944 onwards is considered accurate with data on storms that actually strike the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts considered to be accurate back to 1899. They have graphs of 1944 to near present of the number of named storms, hurricanes, and major hurricanes. Note that these graphs do not resemble monotonically increasing functions, but instead are closer to periodic funcions. Here is the NOAA faq page stating the increase in number and strength of Atlantic hurricanes since 1995 is due to the hurricane cycle. Note that 1991-94 are the quietest four years in the post-1944 record.
    15. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by demachina · · Score: 1

      Wow that was a lot of links. The key point I got out of it is they really don't have data over a long enough period to really identify a cyclic pattern. There is sort of one but the history isn't long enough to prove it. It is clear, and they admit, that there has been a large spike in Hurricanes since 1995 up to now which is 10 years, and the last two years have been exceptionally bad in the Atlantic and gulf.

      Taking the same data I think I could just as easily conclude that there has in fact been a big spike in Hurricane activity in the last ten years and I could depending on whim or prejudice either say its cyclic or its indicative of a new and dangerous trend which might get even worse than it already is.

      One school of global warming theorists contend the oceans have been sinking both heat and carbon dioxide, they may be approaching their limit, and when they reach their limit climate change might accelerate.

      Let me be clear I'm the first to admit there isn't enough evidence to declare human induced global warming to be a fact, or that recent weather extremes may be a by product, but there certainly isn't enough evidence to dismiss it either. Maybe it is due to increases in solar output or something natural.

      Its hard to deny though that our climate is changing rapidly. We could stick our heads in the sand and hope its not man caused and keep doing what we are doing.

      The other option is a simple recognition that use of fossil fuels is almost universally bad. Burning coal slowly poisons everything down wind. Burning gasoline poisons the air in cities. Oil is getting scarce and that scarcity is going to start doing major damage to our economy and lead to vicious global competition for control of the remaining reserves.

      All in all it seems to me like maybe starting to rapidly pursue alternatives would be a really good idea. I'd sure like to hear someone make a case that just sticking our head in the sand continuing the status quo is a good idea, someone other than Exxon Mobile and the Bush administration because their case is based on their own wealth creation not on objective consideration of the issues.

      --
      @de_machina
    16. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by wasted+time · · Score: 1
      I can't believe the NG article below hasn't been posted yet. This story came back to haunt me as I watched the news Sunday evening. Particularly eerie are the two paragraphs quoted below. National Geographic Published Oct. 2004.

      Thousands drowned in the murky brew that was soon contaminated by sewage and industrial waste. Thousands more who survived the flood later perished from dehydration and disease as they waited to be rescued. It took two months to pump the city dry, and by then the Big Easy was buried under a blanket of putrid sediment, a million people were homeless, and 50,000 were dead. It was the worst natural disaster in the history of the United States.

      When did this calamity happen? It hasn't--yet. But the doomsday scenario is not far-fetched. The Federal Emergency Management Agency lists a hurricane strike on New Orleans as one of the most dire threats to the nation, up there with a large earthquake in California or a terrorist attack on New York City. Even the Red Cross no longer opens hurricane shelters in the city, claiming the risk to its workers is too great.
      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    17. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is sort of one but the history isn't long enough to prove it."

      If this is true then there is not enough history to determin if the globe has warmmed up much less whether it is abnormal or caused by CO2.

      "The other option is a simple recognition that use of fossil fuels is almost universally bad."

      As soon as you stop demanding all of the products you use, like the Internet, then everyone in New Orleans will stop makeing energy out of oil.

    18. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      Well maybe the French weren't that stupid after all: they did manage to relocate while unloading Louisiana onto the US...

      Only because they had already reached a point where it was clear French control of anything in the New World was pretty laughable, and they had to pull out anyway. So Napolean offered the land to the US at a price that was far, far lower than the US expected or was willing to pay. It was so low that even though the negotiators didn't have the authority to make the purchase, they went ahead anyway because it was too ridiculously cheap to pass up. This gave Napolean some extra cash which allowed him to finance some wars which ultimately failed.

      By the way, the reason the US made the Louisiana Purchase is the same reason that they won't decide not to rebuild New Orleans: having control of the port at the mouth of the Mississippi River is extremely valuable.

    19. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by demachina · · Score: 0

      "If this is true then there is not enough history to determin if the globe has warmmed up much less whether it is abnormal or caused by CO2."

      Uhhh. I think I said this in my post if you read it. I'm not saying the link between CO2 and global warming is proved, but it is certainly very much a possibility.

      "As soon as you stop demanding all of the products you use, like the Internet, then everyone in New Orleans will stop makeing energy out of oil."

      Oooo, your smart. The Internet runs on electricity. Oil isn't used to generate electricity. Electrity is produced from coal, natural gas, nuclear and hydroelectric. Louisiana's contribution to generating electricity is natural gas, not oil.

      And you might note we could get electricity from hydroelectric, nuclear, solar or wind just as easily as coal or natural gas, then we could still have our Internet and not keep dumping CO2, Mercury, Sulfur and other assorted pollutants in to the air.

      Now wasn't that easy.

      It never ceases to amaze me how many people can't imagine a world where we aren't poisoning it by burning fossil fuels.

      --
      @de_machina
    20. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by ashot · · Score: 1

      you sir are a fool.

      --
      -ashot
    21. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by demachina · · Score: 1

      Why don't you, sir, try to make a coherent argument next time as to why I'm a fool.

      Ad hominem attacks like this are usually the tool of last resort of people who are incapable of engaging in intelligent debate or defending their point of view. You are the one who comes across as a fool because you aren't capable of stating why I'm a fool.

      Its impossible to weigh or dispute the validity of your assertion when you make no case for why you made it in the first place.

      I hope it made you feel good though.

      --
      @de_machina
    22. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by ashot · · Score: 1

      ok, here you go:

      Oooo, your smart. The Internet runs on electricity. Oil isn't used to generate electricity. Electrity is produced from coal, natural gas, nuclear and hydroelectric. Louisiana's contribution to generating electricity is natural gas, not oil.


      The global economy is utterly dependent on a constant supply of oil. everything we do requires tons of oil: transportaion, food production, manufactoring, pesticides, the production of plastics, and computers and other high tech devices. The production of the average desktop computer consumes 10 times its weight in fossil fuels.


      And you might note we could get electricity from hydroelectric, nuclear, solar or wind just as easily as coal or natural gas, then we could still have our Internet and not keep dumping CO2, Mercury, Sulfur and other assorted pollutants in to the air.


      As you might note, this is also complete absurdity, we can't get our electricity "as easily" from other sources, not even close. Barring a major technological breakthrough, these are currently not viable alternatives to oil. In fact our best chance is producing better technology for mining more out of known oil fields and minding non-standard oil reserves out of new locations.

      from http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj09/youngqu1.html:

      "Oil is a unique energy source that has no complete replacement in all its varied end uses. The British scientist Sir Crispin Tickell concludes, "...we have done remarkably little to reduce our dependence on a fuel [oil] which is a limited resource, and for which there is no comprehensive substitute in prospect." [Emphasis mine]

      Coming to realize that oil is finite, any and all suggestions of means to replace oil are welcomed. Cheerful myths are enthusiastically embraced. These include: that there are two trillion barrels of economically recoverable oil in the Colorado Plateau oil shales; that dams and their reservoirs are a source of indefinitely renewable energy and that they are environmentally benign; that solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro-electric power can supply the electrical needs, from the Arctic to the tropics, of the Earth's nearly six billion people (likely to become at least 10 billion in the next fifty years); that coal, oil from oil sands, and biofuels can replace the 72 million barrels of oil the world now uses daily; and that somehow electricity produced from various alternative energy sources can readily provide the great mobility which oil now gives to the more than 600 million vehicles worldwide. Regrettably, none of these cheerful myths appear to be valid.


      better?

      --
      -ashot
    23. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by glitchvern · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry I guess I wasn't entirely clear. I wasn't trying to deny the existence of global warming. I was denying global warming is now or ever would be responsible for an increase in number or intensity of hurricanes. Several of those studies started with the assumption that global warming was real and were trying to determine the affect it would have on hurricanes.

    24. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by demachina · · Score: 1


      "we can't get our electricity "as easily" from other sources, not even close."

      Nuclear is a completely viable option for electricity. It isn't perfect but the risk of an accident in many respects is better than the slow poisoning of the planet with coal fired power plants. Bite the bullet and open the permanent waste disposal site in Nevada and start building pebble beds. Long term actually get serious about fusion research.

      If you are going to do in-situ extraction of tar sands which is about the only way to extend oil reserves you are going to pretty much have to put a nuclear power plant in those fields anyway to provide the electricity for the heater.

      Solar and wind are in fact pretty viable on a certain scale compared to the soaring prices of natural gas.

      The whole problem with your whole approach is you aren't solving anything you are just procrastinating until the inevitable day when fossil fuels run out. Chances are you will be dead so its just your descendants that will have to deal with it, though I imagine you will see and already are seeing some serious wars over control of the oil fields.

      --
      @de_machina
    25. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by ashot · · Score: 1

      We can debate the exact extent to which a combination of alternative sources of energy can replace oil, which in fact is relatively limited (read the article I linked), but I was ultimately I was responding to things you said that ranged from blantantly wrong ("Oil isn't used to generate electricity.") to meaningless ( "The other option is a simple recognition that use of fossil fuels is almost universally bad." ).

      If you want to actually seriously address or understand the energy situation you have to take a look at the economics and logistical issues involved, not fall back on, if I may, foolish, knee-jerk reactions.

      The last paragraph doesn't make sense either, I'm pointing out that there is no viable alterantive to oil, period. The fact that its not renewable and is running out has no bearing whatsoever on this fact.

      --
      -ashot
    26. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by demachina · · Score: 1

      "Oil isn't used to generate electricity."

      Oil is used to produce 2% of the electricity in the U.S. Its statistically meaningless. Gas, Coal, Hydro and Nuclear is where the lion's share comes from.

      "( "The other option is a simple recognition that use of fossil fuels is almost universally bad." )"

      It is universally bad for to be using it as an energy source in particular electricity generation and ground transportation. We could certainly do better and are eventually going to have to if:

      A. CO2 is in fact contributing to global warming

      B. Oil reserves are insufficient to satisfy demand especially for gasoline.

      C. Oil is going to be practically gone in a few decades without resorting to tar sands which take vast amounts of energy just to tap.

      We certainly need fossil fuels for organic chemistry (plastics) for the forseeable future but with abundant cheap electricity from fission/fusion its likely chemical alternatives could be developed. We also have as an option renewable biofuels if someone develops more efficient means for production. If gas hits $4-6 dollars a gallon, and oil $100 dollars a barrel lots of alternatives suddenly become cheaper and better.

      I dearly wish we had a colony on Mars simply because it would compell people to learn to live without fossil fuels.

      "The last paragraph doesn't make sense either, I'm pointing out that there is no viable alterantive to oil, period."

      Well obvious there is we lived without it before and we will have to live without it again when it runs out. Will there be pain yes. There will be a lot less pain if we start working to eliminate the dependence now, instead of waiting until we run out and then saying OOPS! which seems to be your strategy.

      At this point you are just highlighting the fact you must work for an oil company or least you sure think and talk like one. "We are indispensible, we can charge you through the nose for out products from now on, and we will suck all the money out of the rest of the economy to line our pockets." We are the worlds biggest and most successful, legalized, crack dealers.

      --
      @de_machina
    27. Re:A Rather Prescient Article by ashot · · Score: 1

      Its relatively low in the US, but much more prevalent abroad. You also are not factoring in the massive amounts of oil required to build and maintain these energy sources. Also, you're original sentiment was that, well the Internet doesn't need oil because it runs on electricity, which is stupid.

      I never advocated a strategy, nor did I say that we should not invest in research and alternative sources (of course we should). All I am trying to get across is the simple fact that oil is a one of a kind resource that _cannot_ be replaced by any alternative to drive the world economy at current speeds. An alternative that costs 4 times as much is NOT an alternative. A prohibitably expensive alternative, isn't. Because of the massive and self-multiplying trickle effects the world economy would grind to a halt. Which is exactly why saying that using oil is "univerally bad" is completely MEANINGLESS.

      Is true that oil is a limited resource and cannot continue to serve our energy needs at current levels forever (most likely very much longer) true and important? Yes. Should we invest in alternative sources of energy? Yes. Should we stop pumping oil out of New Orleans? NO. Oil running out != oil is "universally bad"

      Perhaps lets try an analogy: You are stuck in a desert and you have only a few days of water left. You should certainly be actively looking for alternative sources of water. Should you stop drinking the water you have with you? Is the water that you are drinking "universally bad"?

      --
      -ashot
  24. Simple by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Informative

    The networks are not designed for theoretical maximum capacity, they are designed for average peak observed capacity. If there are 1 million cell phones in use and only 10-20% of them are actively transmitting at a time during normal use, why shell out for 5 times as much infrastructure as is needed to support that level of use? A catastrophe like Katrina or 9/11 only happens once every few years; the rest of the time the excess capacity would only be draining resources - not just from the corporate bottom line, but from maintaining the 10-20% of the equipment that's actually used by subscribers.

    1. Re:Simple by VoiceOfSanity · · Score: 1

      The problem is that in areas such as New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, networks should be designed to handle a maximum number of connections, if simply for handling emergency information. That, or be able to throw a switch (flip a bit) and limit connectivity to only emergency personnel who have specially registered cell phones. In this way, police, fire and rescue personnel would have the ability to communicate and be able to use the phone networks as a backup to their regular networks.

      As you've said, a disaster such as Katrina happens every few years. Would you rather have the capacity available so that when the next Katrina (or Camille, Betsy, Ivan, Andrew, $HURRICANE NAME) strikes, you're able to provide what's needed instead of having to try and figure out how to bring in extra equipment into areas where you can't drive/boat/truck into.

      I've been through a number of these storms, and one of the most important things that has to be provided is information. People need to know what's going on, and cell phone companies can help out much more than they're doing now. Things like sending out text messages to subscribers in an area informing them of updates, where they can go for shelter, evacuation routes would be a good start. As the capabilities of the phones increase, the celluar companies need to start providing this information as a public service. Certainly Cingular, T-Mobile, Nextel and Alltel could be doing this right now in the affected areas. It certainly wouldn't hurt, and if it saves a person's life, then that's benefit enough in my mind.

    2. Re:Simple by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And maybe if the networks had the infrastructure in place to handle more than 10% of their subscribers, the service wouldn't suck so badly. Seriously. I've had far too many dropped calls lately, and my guess is they wouldn't happen so often (in some cases I have to call the person I'm talking to back every 3-5 minutes, and no 10+ minute conversation is possible) if they had enough infrastructure in the area to handle all their users.

      This is in Chicago, by the way, where there are probably a shitload of people on cellphones.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    3. Re:Simple by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      I already in another post mentioned the NCS GETS system:

      http://gets.ncs.gov/

      (the 710 area code system used for disasters).

      As for cell phones there is something called "Overload Class". Emergency personnel have theirs set to 15, which means their calls get priority.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  25. Re:Yet another reason by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and why I prefer the northeast. 0 serious earthquakes, 0 landslides, 0 hurricanes, 0 tornados (mostly anyway)

    There just aren't much of any natural phenomenon that you can't adequately prepare for in advance up there.

    Sadly I'm in DC these days...the home of some the most obscene unnatural disasters, our very own House and Senate...ugh


    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  26. No power for cell towers = no coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you take away the antenna your cell phone talks to, it's about as usefull as a paperweight for communication

    1. Re:No power for cell towers = no coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most cell phone towers (at least from the major carriers) have diesel powered backup generators that automatically switch on when main power goes down. Usually, this is sufficient to keep the site running for 48-72 hours.

      Still, if the antennas/towers suffered wind damage it'd be a moot point.

  27. Re:Yet another reason by greythax · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, just those annoying blackouts and riots, eh? :)

  28. Tough One... by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

    Gee, this is a tough one...

    Well, lets start with the obvious: Mobile phones have to connect to a network via a series of towers. Now, with the power out, some towers will be down, diminishing the available coverage. Some towers, however, have their own generators. permitting them to run despite power interruptions. Few of those, I imagine, come equipped with snorkel kits in the event 25 feet of water come rushing over them, and so have likely stopped working.

    Next up is communication lines. In case it wasn't made clear to you elsewhere, cell towers aggregate the individual calls together and send them out over a cable - "hard line" for fans of The Matrix. When 120 mile-per-hour winds come whipping through your town, some of these cables will inevitably be torn down. Some run underground - not sure how common this is in New Orleans, where underground is just that much more moist. In any case, most of these technologies rely on power running along the lines, power at the endpoints, or both. When the central office loses power, it doesn't matter how many cell towers sitting atop hills still have functioning generators and great coverage... the calls won't leave the area.

    Finally, welcome to the concept of oversold bandwidth. Simply put, there are more phones out there than there are available lines to connect half of them (each call has two phones, so...). This is based on the time-honored knowledge that it is extremely rare for everyone to want to use the phone at once. It would be far too costly to make it possible for everyone in New York to be on the phone at once, especially since most (>80%, is my uneducated guess) of the bandwidth would sit, un-used, for most (>95) of the time.

    In order to prevent disasters from causing communication problems, we would have to throw money at the problem. We'd need cell towers with self-contained air supplies that could last x days, as well as over-blown fiber connections meshed around between different towers to share load and act as fault tolerance. Cell service has the same problem as the Last Mile in broadband... like it or not, the last mile is a single point of failure, that can only be protected by extraordinary - and expensive - measures.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Tough One... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We'd need cell towers with self-contained air supplies that could last x days,

      Why? Does cellular equipment need to breath? Or would it not suffice to make the buildings water-proof?
    2. Re:Tough One... by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      The equipment doesn't need to breathe, but the generators do.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  29. Red Cross runs IT now? by CycleMan · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    To hear that the Red Cross is bringing in telecom equipment surprises me. Are there not enough sick and homeless people that need care? Cell phone usage is not going to be limited to "Hi, Mom, I'm okay but I've gotta go so a thousand other folks can say hello." The cell phone is a luxury right now; a dry place to sleep is the real need.

    Maybe now that the power is down, all that broadband-over-power-lines will be down so the ham radio operators can help with the truly urgent info.

    1. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by greythax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a dry place to sleep is the real need. Which is why bringing in communications equipment is a good idea. The sooner that victims can arange to be somewhere other than a shelter (by calling family, finding out of town shelters, etc.), the sooner you will have an extra bed for someone who doesn't have that option. Maybe now that the power is down, all that broadband-over-power-lines will be down so the ham radio operators can help with the truly urgent info. Well, not to flame, but if you had a child that had just moved into the dorm at UNO, and you didn't know if they were alive or not, your definition of "urgent info" might change a bit. This is not an either/or circumstance, bringing in a satalite phone or 2 is not going to cause the survivors to start keeling over. I am sure if it were the choice between a life and a phone, the red cross would choose the life.

    2. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how would the red cross communicate and coordinate with the infrastructure in ruins?

    3. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      Someone correct me if you know otherwise but the Red Cross puts in satellite (and other RF) communication for use by law enforcement and search and rescue, they do not provide general cell service in any way shape or form.

    4. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct. The grandparnet is Trolling.

    5. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Right now, cell phone is also usable in the instance of "HELP! We're on the roof, and the water is still rising!"

    6. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe now that the power is down, all that broadband-over-power-lines will be down so the ham radio operators can help with the truly urgent info.
      Great. Now all the ham operators in New Orleans can talk to each other. But all the other cities in the US, they still have their BPL (because the power is still on), so there's nobody else to talk to, just each other. Local BPL doesn't really affect transmission of HF signals, only the reception.

      And of course if you have BPL active in your city 99.9% of the time, making the HF bands useless, how many hams would go to the trouble of obtaining and maintaining HF equipment for that 0.1% of the time it actually works? A rig may work after being in storage for a few years, but the batteries probably won't, and the antenna may or may not.

      Fortunately, BPL has not been rolled out universally, so the HF bands are still useful for most. For now.

      DE AD5RH

    7. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Jeezus H Kryst - The Red Cross has to be able to talk to their own people to co-ordinate things. Everything on the ground is fucked up, broken and under water. All cables are wet, diesel generators are drowned and the Red Cross has to somehow get their people in and figure out WTF is going on. So, obviously they need radio equipment, computers, satellite equipment, generators and the like...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    8. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by Fubar · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cell phone is a luxury right now; a dry place to sleep is the real need.

      The Red Cross is bringing in telcom equipment to not only provide an outside link to those affected by the disaster, but to also coordinate the RC's response to this disaster.

      Each service center and shelter needs comms back to their assigned HQ which also needs comms to other HQ's and to the National HQ in Washington D.C. How do you do that in areas which have had their infrastructure wiped out? You bring it with you.

      That is why the Red Cross is deploying their ECRVs (mentioned in the article) and "Fly Away Kits" which provide stationary sat comms.

      This is not about giving people cell service (something the Red Cross isn't equipped for), this is about creating a lifeline to the rest of the world using satellite links and VoIP.

    9. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by Lovejoy · · Score: 1

      Any time Slashdot reports on a story about tech being provided to a third world area or a disaster site, someone chimes in and says "Hey! They need Food/Water/Medicine, not Cell Phones!"

      The Red Cross and other agencies aren't making a choice between providing communications and providing relief supplies. Every relief channel they've got is completely filled up, probably all the way back to Memphis/Houston/Atlanta (or other cities - I don't know which ones they're using), with more coming in to those staging centers every day.

      Communication is vital to people there - and far from frivolous. I have a friend who still hasn't heard from her family in Southern Mississippi.

    10. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Are there not enough sick and homeless people that need care?

      Poverty is a problem that has a diminishing return with money spent. You will never get rid of it. So whie that money might have made 1-3 families squalid life somewhat less squalid, it might atcually save lives in this instance. Plus, telecoms will donate the equipment as PR moves.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    11. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by ces · · Score: 1

      The Red Cross needs communications gear to co-ordinate it's own relief efforts as well as to help out Federal, State, and Local governments (FEMA and the Military is bringing in gear too).

      By all reports local police and fire are having problems due to poor communications as well. In many cases all of the base stations and repeaters are probably offline.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    12. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      To hear that the Red Cross is bringing in telecom equipment surprises me.

      Me also - I'm sorry, but if a hurricane just blew my house over, that last thing I'd be worried about is getting my network up. What the heck is the Red Cross doing with someone who has a "Network Services" title? I always thought that the Red Cross meant "Help for the needy in disasters" but now I don't think im ever going to give a dime to them, if this is how they justify spending my DONATION. Why spend a ton of cash on satellite equipment when the HAMs can do it (and WANT to do it) for free? Seems like we got some interest groups meddling in there somewhere, or some director looking for some quick perks.

      Just my opinion...

    13. Re:Red Cross runs IT now? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Me also - I'm sorry, but if a hurricane just blew my house over, that last thing I'd be worried about is getting my network up.

      Who said anything about getting *your* network up?

      What the heck is the Red Cross doing with someone who has a "Network Services" title?

      Becuase they have a database of available resources, and they need to find a way of distributing those resources most efficiently.

      I always thought that the Red Cross meant "Help for the needy in disasters" but now I don't think im ever going to give a dime to them, if this is how they justify spending my DONATION.

      Because you think that their ability to coordinate distribution of assistance is not in their purvew? They should just drop all the supplies off at the Superdome and, well, anyone at the convention center (not an official refugee site, though there are thousands there) are just fucked. Hey, it's their own fault for not going where they are supposed to. Oh, wait, there was no one to call and no phone lines to call over, but it is still their own fault for not being in the grossly overcrowded Superdome to start with.

      Why spend a ton of cash on satellite equipment when the HAMs can do it (and WANT to do it) for free?

      Yeah, and I'd like to see that. How do you get HAMs to scale to let 100,000 people call their relatives and try to secure alternate housing, since their home is still underwater and may not be recoverable? How do you get instant and constant communication from an on-site command center to 30-50 off-site resouce centers, with roaming access for those that are checking out places like the convention center and other places people may have gathered unofficially?

      Seems like we got some interest groups meddling in there somewhere, or some director looking for some quick perks.

      Seems like some fucknut has worked a tiny level problem and thinks what he does if his basement under Mom floods scales up to a huge regional program.

      Just my opinion...

      Mine too.

  30. Its working for me! by ZosX · · Score: 1

    Hey! I'm in New Orleans and my cell is just working fi

    NO CARRIER

  31. Flooding by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
    Of course the system failed. The cities have flooded, there is no power in much of the area, and a good number of towers and other infrastructure has been damaged.

    One of the city levees has been leaking and without power they estimate the homes of hundreds of thousands will be flooded. Without power there's also the lack of pumps running. Much of the city is 6 ft below the level of the Misssissippi River.

    This is pretty much your worst case scenario in the Gulf Coast happening. Nice weather now, but people won't even be allowed back to some neighborhoods for at least one week. Others are still being evacuated, by boat, as flood waters rise.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Flooding by geomon · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much your worst case scenario in the Gulf Coast happening. Nice weather now, but people won't even be allowed back to some neighborhoods for at least one week. Others are still being evacuated, by boat, as flood waters rise.

      A guy in my office has family in New Orleans. They left for Memphis on Saturday. They have kept contact with people who have gone in to assess the damage to their property. His mother's house is under water - to the roofline.

      My colleage's entire family is taking the month off to give the city time to get the water out. With Lake Pontchartrain draining into the city, it will take a couple of weeks just to get the water back out - there is literally no where to pump it out to.

      If anyone from New Orleans is reading this, the word is that only the northern side of town has been spared major flood damage.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    2. Re:Flooding by e1618978 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bet after this the houses that are above the flood line will sell at a premium price...

  32. cell phones are like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cell phones are like gym memberships and broadband... completly oversold.

    It's too bad they don't advertise this limitation -- but why would they?

    They would rather have thier customers draw thier own realistic expectations as it's clearly better than reality.

  33. /. has been watching too much mass media by thesandbender · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wind does not affect satellite signals. It effects the dishes. Rain does attenuate the signal however. Regardless, the storm will have blown over by the time the Red Cross gets the equipment setup. All and all this was not a well thought out post: 1. Capacity : Yes, the cell companies could build out the capacity to support everyone calling at once but you don't want to foot the bill. Every once in a while you need to speed to pass some one, you don't buy a porsche do you? Why? Because most of us justify it, much less afford it. 2. Robustness : Lets see if you house stands up to 20 feet of water and 145 mph winds. I'm certain it won't... why not... because you don't want to pay for it. Cell phones are not a public service, they are a commodity and are priced and scaled accordingly. I'm sure the cell phone companies would be more than happy to accomodate you if you'll sign the 10 year $250/month service contract.

    1. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      2. Robustness : Lets see if you house stands up to 20 feet of water and 145 mph winds. I'm certain it won't... why not... because you don't want to pay for it.
      Either that, or you think concrete is ugly.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rain affects the small space between the reflector and the LNB. So if rain travels between the dish itself and the "stalk" pointing at the dish, then your signal will degrade since the relatively weak signal is concentrated into a small spot. As long as the rain is diverting the weak signal coming from the satellite. So think of it like shining a flashlight at someone and the put their hand up to interfere, the light still manages to mostly get to the destination. If someone shoots a laser pointer at you and you block it with your hand, then that is it, no more signal.
       
      This is why you'll see "dish socks" stretchy covers that go over the dish. It keeps rain from passing through the dish and the LNB.

    3. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm not debating any of your other points, because they're all valid and well thought out in my opinion, but...
      if you'll sign the 10 year $250/month service contract
      Contracts are a method not to ensure income for the service but to force customers to pay more for the service than the service is worth. Wireless companies already have a captive audience, to the tune of hundreds of millions of customers. They already make obscene amounts of money and were they not so driven by personal greed and profit there's the chance their infrastructure would be able to withstand these problems. The networks have the capacity problems that they have not because it's not possible but because it would affect the personal profits of the persons that run these companies, either by hitting the company (and thus shareholders') bottom line or because the pay of executives is tied to the corporation's profits. Whatever the twist, wireless companies care about profit, not about reliability or functionality or anything else. Coincidentally they may care about those things, but it's profit profit profit first.

      I guess my question is, whatever happened to good citizenship and being a beneficial, constructive part of society instead of a leech of money?

      Wireless phones have become commoditized and I'm surprised people don't tend to expect them to work the same way land-line phones, electricity and water work. They're utilities, everyone has them, they're dirt cheap and the people got together to use our collective power and legislative influence to require the costs to be low and to recognize them as basic services that 100% of people should receive (though we accept lower percentages as a way of being reasonable).

      People can point and shout and call me a communist until they're red in the face, but as long as we let companies divide and milk us we'll never move beyond this paradigm. What have phone companies promised that they deliver? Digital services? Great, so now instead of my phone fading out but having clear voice services it cuts o t at r ndom t mes com lete y and sounds like it was compressed with lossy compression and decompressed ten times along the way. 3G? I'm still waiting for 3G services from my provider. When they do manage to do something right, like move their phone services onto their Internet networks, it never results in tangible benefits for customers. I don't know about you, but since I've had a wireless phone the cost per month has only gone up and the quality of customer service and wireless service has gone down.

      I don't know about the rest of you, but if it comes down to Sprint making another twenty million dollars next month and fixing the problems with their networks and capacity, I'm all for the part that benefits people and not corporations.
    4. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by tzanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it's all the rain that's in the distance between the satellite and the dish reflector itself that kills the signal. The small space between the reflector and the LNB is where the signal's strongest. And the "socks" are there to keep snow, squirrels, birds, etc. from collecting in that small space and absorbing the faint signals.

    5. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it does not effect the dishes, it affects the dishes...

    6. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see the above post as being mod'd up. Its not only the cell phone industry, its also the ILEC (Incumbant Local Exchange Carriers).

      Capacity has to be considered on few sides:
      1) Switch (telco switch, matrix)
      2) Transport to and from the switch.
      3) The actual signaling links that control the set up and tear down of calls.

      The following link illustrates utilization / traffic analysis; its also a brief primer on a telco network.

      http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/its v/cmgpbx.html

      Keep in mind that the tables only show how many trunks are needed to support a flow of traffic. The actual switches have their own limitations (IE: 500,000 calls per hour). For a quick reference: a decked out 5ess goes for about 10 Million (fully equip'd).

      Disclaimer: Fully equip'd references that there is no more capacity within that switch to grow beyond that point. Now the actual cards that populate the switch vary in cost. The 10 million mark is reference to a local EO switch (end office).

    7. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by mshawatmit · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the cell phone companies would be more than happy to accomodate you if you'll sign the 10 year $250/month service contract.

      Actually, I know a number of people who would pay that kind of money for a cell phone that is guaranteed to work. Members of Congress can't even get reliable cell phone service in our country. If cell phone companies offered an ultra-expensive plan that gave crystal clear reception all the time, they would get customers.

    8. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if the cell companies were to have the capacity for everyone to make a call it would be pointless. With the local telecom's buried outside plant completely submerged or its aerial plant blown over, the cell network can't function. Cell towers require wireline feeds to the phone network.

    9. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by Ravadill · · Score: 1

      Maybe call it a satellite phone! Amazing!

    10. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Even then you would have issues. The weather would have caused the cell phones to be scratchy at best.

      Also, when I supported satellite customers for internet access, there where specific days of the year that there would be no service what so ever - nothing anyone could do about it. I don't know if voice communication has this (doubt it, but I'm not a rocket scientist yet). But after my support time with Internet Satellite access, I wouldn't touch that stuff if you gave me free service, equipment and paid me to use it.

      Add in the effects of weather, lag times, etc - I honestly wouldn't consider satellite reliable for an always on, crystal clear, phone.

    11. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      No, satellite phone is not a 100% reliable channel. Weather affects it too much, and on high lattitudes (e.g. Russia) it needs a large antenna.

      Besides, satellites don't work sometimes if there is no active satellite in sight - this often happens during equinox when satellites are obscured by the the Earth's shadow.

    12. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by pyser · · Score: 2, Informative

      if rain travels between the dish itself and the "stalk" pointing at the dish, then your signal will degrade

      The "stalk" is called the feed assembly. Old timers like me still call it the "feed horn". In most satellite receive systems, it contains the actual receive antenna (usually a horn-coupled waveguide) and a preamplifier and frequency converter commonly called a "LNB" (low-noise block converter).

      Heavy rain affects Ku-band satellite signals by attenuating them as they make their way through the area of rain near the surface. The signal can also be scattered somewhat by the rain but it is not as significant a phenomenon as rain attenuation. Here is a good explanation of rain fade.

      I've seen rain fade affect terrestrial microwave links as well. I once lost a 13-GHz link for about 10 minutes when a heavy rain storm moved into the path between the transmitter and receiver. The fade margin on that link was around 30 dB, so the rain cut the signal to less than one-thousandth of what it was. I've also seen C-band rain fade, but this was on a very-small-aperture (1-meter) dish which has just enough gain to get the signal it's supposed to get.

      "dish socks" stretchy covers that go over the dish. It keeps rain from passing through the dish and the LNB.

      These are actually covers that primarily prevent snow from accumulating in the dish and spoiling the parabola, greatly reducing the antenna gain and consequently the recovered signal strength. Other methods of accomplishing this are a non-stick coating applied to the dish so that the snow slides off, and heating systems, either heat tapes applied to the surface or hot-air systems, which blow heated air into cavities behind the dish panels. The latter is most often used on uplinks, where a change in gain and directivity could mistakenly illuminate other satellites.

    13. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by nwf · · Score: 1

      Satellite phones also don't work when too many people have them and try to use them in an emergency. This was learned in LA during the fire storms. They aren't designed for a massive influx of calls. Sample applies to cell phones, but more so. (Around where I live, they can't handle rush hour!)

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    14. Re:/. has been watching too much mass media by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know it is called a feed horn, but since I'm on Slashdot, I dumbed it down a bit. Speaking of non-stick coatings, why doesn't someone make a teflon coated dish? I had an old teflon coated Wok that would probably make a nice Ku dish.

  34. Re:VoIP by Xygon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's assuming that you're IP provider still has active data connections, the wind hasn't knocked over the cables you're relying on, and any number of things. I swear, a lot of you need to go to one RACES meeting and realize what emergency communications is really like. You can't rely on the base infrastructure to be in place below you in an emergency.

  35. with all the rain and wind... by zenneth · · Score: 1

    I guess smoke signals are out of the question.

    --
    The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
  36. What about tsunamis and mudslides by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    Give me 100 earthquakes, and 0 hurricanes. CA>FL.
    Mother nature has a tendancy to screw around with the people who think they are safe.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:What about tsunamis and mudslides by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the raging forest fires. And Hollywood.

    2. Re:What about tsunamis and mudslides by jcr · · Score: 1

      Also, if you live on a dead-flat prarie, at an elevation of 1500 feet above sea level, you can still get hit by a twister.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  37. How abou the Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to be a whiny bitch, but...

    What about the fucking power? I live in South Florida and my lights and air were out till fucking 7:45pm last night. This storm was a pussy when it here in Broward County, yet the lights were out for 4 days.

    Sorry...back to people with real problems...

    BTW: My Cingular phone worked perfectly the whole time, Nextel/Sprint's were having trouble.

    1. Re:How abou the Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      boohoo, maybe you now know how those Iraqis feel youve been busy killin for 2 years they havent had electricity in years !!

      iam sure they are laughing right now though

  38. don't be such a fool by llZENll · · Score: 1

    Hm, lets see you build a telecom infrastructure that can handle 100% of its customers usage at the same time, oh wait, subscription plans will cost $1000/month, do you see the problem?

    Internet, phone, etc all carry WAY more subscribers than they can handle at one time for a good reason, ECONOMICS and they all don't use their services 100% of the time. If they did then you would be complaining about $1000/month cell phone bills, so I guess no matter what we would still get hear you whine... arg.

    1. Re:don't be such a fool by Halvy · · Score: 0

      .. do you see the problem?..

      Uh, yes Sir, we do see the problem..

      What we neeeed to do, is take your thoughtful advice!

      Why without your valuable input, we would never have realized, that it is nothing but OUR fault, that the system is failing, .. but for a very good reason!!

      Which is, kind Sir, that the money that we pay for service, is going to line the pockets of a handful of Ceo's and investors, so they can continue on with their nighlty joints with 'Crack-Whores'.

      --
      I will gladly loose all of life's battles.. in order to win the war..
  39. Reason why we cant connect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that one of the reasons why we cant connect, isnt the fact of cell phone towers being down, or equipment being down. Its more along the lines of the way the system is built. If you are a cell phone company, and have 100,000 subscribers(these numbers are estimates btw), you should build your network to hold 200,000 subscribers. Im sure alot of these networks arent built to handle more than they have. In essence what the companies support are much less because if they have 100,000 subscribers, chances are not all of them will be using the phones are the same time. So they only have the network supporting 40% of the subscribers. If there happens to be a disaster, everyone is trying to call in, and everyone is trying to call out, so it fills up the network and you get the dreaded, all our lines are busy atm please try again later.
    This situation happened with 9/11 as well and im sure there were many towers that went down, it was only 2 buildings.

  40. Katrina and the Waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed I haven't seen any bad Katrina jokes yet.

  41. HAMS: Help Needed! by SonicSpike · · Score: 2, Informative

    ATTN HAM RADIO OPERATORS:
    After watching all of the major news outlets they are all mentioning that communications in and out of the city of New Orleans is practically nullified.

    Tens of thousands (if not a hundred thousand) or more are trapped in the city following hurricane Katrina. This problem is worsened by the fact that after this cyclone, the city is flooded and the waters are RISING, not receding! This is an urgent situation and needs immediate attention!

    Because of the need of hundreds of search and rescue missions, and the lack of ability of communications infrastructure to operate, assuming it is still existent at all, I would call FOR EVERY AVAILABLE HAM RADIO OPERATOR TO ATTEMPT TO GIVE THEIR ASSISTANCE TO THIS AREA!

    Well-prepared self-sufficient mobile ham radio operators would make a difference in saving lives and passing 'life and limb' traffic in and out of the disaster area. I would like to propose hams descend on the city and surrounding areas to provide a temporary communications infrastructure until such time that officials are able to provide this on their own.

    KG4JYD
    Matt Collins
    Nashville, TN

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:HAMS: Help Needed! by dougmc · · Score: 1
      I would like to propose hams descend on the city and surrounding areas to provide a temporary communications infrastructure until such time that officials are able to provide this on their own.
      I would instead propose that hams contact the authorities in/near New Orleans or the Red Cross and ask what sort of assistance they can offer, rather than just loading up their car or boat and going.

      A flood of well intentioned amateurs (ham radio and others) could very well make things worse rather than better. Even well prepared hams may -- or may not -- be of much assistance. And poorly prepared hams could very well end up requiring rescuing of their own.

      Fortunately, organizations like ARES do have protocols in place for things like this. If you want to help, contacting your local ARES group might be a good place to start. But certainly, don't just load your car up with bottled water and radio gear and go.

      AD5RH

    2. Re:HAMS: Help Needed! by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      1) Can anyone even contact these agencies around this area? Assuming they actually have com, wouldn't they be swamped with traffic?

      2) Showing up on their door step and ready to help submitting themselves to authorities that would best know how to allocate their resources would be a good idea? It is obvious they need help, why wait?

      I am not suggesting everyone go in there half-cocked but if you notice I said "well-prepared, self-sufficient" hams should make themselves useful. That does NOT include every single individual that has passed their ham exam.

      I am also not suggesting that these people are absent of leadership structure and organization. ARES/FEMA/RC/NG/etc would obviously be in charge and coordinate positioning and allocation of radio communication resources.

      According to the news outlets all communications infrastructure is non-functional in most of that part of the state. There are even reports that they have not heard ANYTHING from several of the most southern parishes (counties). So unless you have a satellite transceiver, or a ham radio, there is no information flow in and out. I am not talking about "health and welfare" information either; I am talking about emergency communications for search and rescue missions, location of those stranded, and critical life-saving information which is crucial for the preservation of life.

      Personally I am an Eagle Scout, have 2 meritorious life saving awards, I am CPR certified by the Red Cross, and of course I am a ham. I also have extensive experience in boating and maritime activities.

      If I had the time/resources I would head down there myself and be the first to assist with communications however possible. Since I am physically unable to go, I urge everyone who is able, willing, and prepared to do so make an effort to help out.

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    3. Re:HAMS: Help Needed! by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Can anyone even contact these agencies around this area?
      I said in/near. If you can't contact the police in New Orleans, contact them in a nearby city. They're probably helping out and can help get you in contact with somebody. And I'm sure the Red Cross could help get you aimed in the right direction as well. Your local ARES group, especially if you live close to New Orleans, is probably already working on plans to help. They might be your best bet if you're a ham.
      Personally I am an Eagle Scout, have 2 meritorious life saving awards, I am CPR certified by the Red Cross, and of course I am a ham. I also have extensive experience in boating and maritime activities.
      That's nice. It still has no bearings on whether other people, prepared or not, should pack up and go to New Orleans without knowing what they're getting into or what sort of help is needed.

      This is not the first time a disaster has happened, and hams (and others) have tried to help. There are procedures in place for helping, and it would be most effective to use them.

      You're not the first person to suggest that people flock to New Orleans. For example, there's this bozo, a known troll on the austin.general group. He may be seriously trying to help, but knowing his history I have my doubts. And if the mayor really did call out for this, I'd expect to read it on cnn.com, not just on austin.general.

    4. Re:HAMS: Help Needed! by uforgotten · · Score: 1

      Amateur radio support is being mobilized.
      In my area they are assembling a group to go, but are asking only for those who can bring enough supplies, radios and battery power to be self-sufficent for at least 72 hours so they can be deployed in areas that are the most devastated.

      http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/08/30/1/?nc= 1

    5. Re:HAMS: Help Needed! by PiratePTG · · Score: 1
      I would instead propose that hams contact the authorities in/near New Orleans or the Red Cross and ask what sort of assistance they can offer, rather than just loading up their car or boat and going.

      Agreed! While any assistance in an emergency is generally appreciated, you would not believe the logistical nighmare that occurs when hundreds of well-meaning people show up to "help". I've seen it during hurricane Andrew, where tons of donated supplies rotted in the rain and sun, and last year during Charlie, where groups just wandered around looking for "someone to help".

      Relief efforts must be coordinated, otherwise the efforts just become part of the problem. Additional people in the area loads down an already overloaded support system. Food, water, clothing, shelter, sanitary needs... All of these have to be met, first for the survivors in the area, then for the first responders, then for the relief responders, and so on. If you aren't capable of being 100% self-sufficient for your intended stay in the disaster area, you are adding to the burden of the other rescue agencies.

      Now, that all said, I have assembled all of my general rescue gear, radios, antennas, extra food, water, clothing, etc, and am ready to pack my truck and head that way. A co-worker has offered me his airboat, and I have contacted 3 different agencies and am awaiting a call back and a destination to deploy to.

      I do urge everyone to call their local Salvation Army and drop them a few bucks... The money WILL get to the disaster area, and will do more good than general donations of food, clothing, etc. The Sal knows what it needs, give it the funds to purchase it!

      73 de Paul, KC4YDY

      --
      The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
  42. Poor planing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't the Red Cross has mobile base station ready to deploy in containers? Complete with fuel, generators and atennas. Ericsson has developed microcells for this use.

    FCC should force phone companies to have at least 48h of backup power in case of power failuers.

  43. Re:Yet another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and didn't chicago have a great fire that wasn't really so great?

  44. Too busy looting by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Some of the residents of NO are too busy looting non emergency related items to even begin to think about alternative communication methods.

  45. This is a tricky bootstrap problem. by jcr · · Score: 1

    They need to drain the city to get the power back on, they need power to drive the pumps to drain the city...

    I've heard some officials speculating that New Orleans could be under water for weeks or even months. My heart goes out to everyone affected by this tragedy.

    I always thought that the biggest hazard to New Orleans was the Mississippi overflowing, since they had two 100-year flood seasons back to back in the last decade.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:This is a tricky bootstrap problem. by ross.w · · Score: 1

      1. Leave the water there
      2. Hire gondolas
      3. Invite tourists
      .
      .
      .
      Profit!

      Well it worked for Venice.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  46. But we get to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To rebuild stuff *under sea level*. Idiots.

    1. Re:But we get to pay by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. If you live in a danger prone area such as coastal towns, earthquakes, tornados, etc... you get to pay for your own rebuilding. Just make sure you have the appropriate insurance! Or just move to Las Vegas where natural disasters are when a few roads flood and then it subsides the next day.

  47. OT: IT web site disaster plans by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Most universities in New Orleans are down without power, as are most small businesses.

    Does your company or institution have a web-site-redirect plan if your web host goes dark for more than a few hours, or in this case, weeks?

    It doesn't have to be a full mirror, a page that simply says "We are temporarily closed for business due to a disaster" along with contact information is usually enough for small businesses.

    Just be sure the contact information is valid for the duration of the outage.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  48. Re:ET: Electric Terrestrial vs Ham Radio by kb1cvh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RF isn't a great answer for EVERYONE to chat up with their friends and family.

    However, RF - as implimented by Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES) and the National Traffic System (NTS) can provide health and welfare traffic ie. I'm alive in 'selter location' with ..... That traffic is secondary to priority and emergency traffic for the served agencies (FEMA, Red Cross, Salvation Army, etc), until the land line and other services are restored.

    73 (best regards).

    --
    Peter AI6PG
  49. This is why BPL is a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    During this disaster Amateur radio operators (almost always the first communications up and running) have been of significant assistence.

    BPL will make amateur radio effectivly unusable if it is implemented widely.

    But but but... I hear you saying... BPL won't be creating interference when the power is down!

    What people forget is that amateur radio operators use thier radios between disasters, including practice disaster scenarios.

    If BPL becomes widespread then they (we) will be significantly disadvantaged and it will start driving amateurs away from this hobby (this hobby which has so many community benifits).

    This can already be seen with the restrictions on antennas (covenants etc) that are becomming more and more common.

    If this trend continues we might not be there next time we are needed :-/

    1. Re:This is why BPL is a bad idea. by Da_Biz · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not necessarily. There was a post on this topic earlier in the comments chain, regarding ARRL and Motorola testing BPL equipment that appears to _not_ cause interference.

      http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=160601&cid= 13440126

    2. Re:This is why BPL is a bad idea. by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry--who the heck modded this Troll? I was making a reference to another Slashdot article.

  50. That is a good question by HairyCanary · · Score: 1
    Aside from all the folks saying you can only have so many circuits, and the towers will blow down, and the wires will tear in the wind, etc. This is still a good question to ask. We are a high tech society, so presumably we could figure solutions to some of this?

    Like ...

    1. Run hard wires underground to protect them from wind. Obviously some places already does this, and it has the side benefit of eliminating unsightly overhead wires.

    2. Protect the underground wiring from water. We obviously know how to do this, otherwise we couldn't be running cables along the ocean floor.

    3. Make cell towers more resistant to damage. A 175 mph wind sounds like a lot, but it is by no means something we cannot defend against. And put the generators for the towers up off the ground at least 25 feet. Also not difficult.

    4. Come up with something better than fixed size circuits. Sure, I'd like my 64K voice channel when all is normal, but I'd get by with a lot less if all I needed to do was basic communication. Cell phone companies already do this with the wireless end of things. Now the phone companies have to finish implementing it on the hard lines.

    Those are just thoughts off the top of my head. Perhaps I'm way off base, but I just don't see that there is any insurmountable difficulty in building a communications network capable of handling spikes in demand that far exceed its average usage. Is this what we get for letting capitalism alone decide what technology we use?

    1. Re:That is a good question by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Well, the best I think that can be guaranteed is HAM and other like systems. I don't know if you can reasonably build any infrastructure that is going to be guaranteed to survive a class 4 or 5 hurricane. Even underground wiring can, and very likely will become inundated when you have 6 to 20 feet of water on top of it. It's gonna have to be a communications system based on batteries and portable generators, whether its HAM or satellite or whatever.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:That is a good question by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Most of your ideas sound good, but I have a few reservations about underground power+data. Running power and data lines underground sounds good, but maintainence is a PITA compared to overhead wires because of the problem getting to buried, sealed pipes vs climbing a tower (for example, if you wanted to upgrade the data line). Bizzarely, there have also been cases where morons have tried to dig up copper and sell it... However, I certainly think we should have some data lines buried to allow communication in an emergency.

      While hardening cell phone towers against damage and power loss is certainly possible, the question is "at what cost." The added expense of hardening the structure of a cell tower to withstand a category 5 hurricane. The generator and fuel to run it through a power outage that may last weeks would be rather expensive (anyone know exactly how much power a cell mast uses?). You would also have to harden all the landlines it connects to that run out of the probable disaster area. This all costs money, and for a problem that takes down service for 2 weeks in several years, cell phones companies just aren't willing to pay. I'm not saying it's right, but that's the problem: Money.

    3. Re:That is a good question by Jacked · · Score: 1

      I actually agree with your post, but, there is something else to consider regarding point 3: it's not the 175mph wind you have to defend against... it's the 150mph steel drums, 2x4s, etc. being carried by the wind :)

  51. We need a geek relief agency by danharan · · Score: 1

    Dropping solar-powered wireless mesh nodes where needed.

    Hey, imagine all those nerds stuck in emergency shelters that can't read /. right now! Don't you think they'd appreciate this?

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  52. More to the point... by sterno · · Score: 1

    Of course the systems failed because there's no money to be made in building the kind of redundancy into the system that's necessary to keep running. It would be possible to build a hurricane resistent communications network but you'd have to pay a lot of money to do that. When you are competing for subscribers, they aren't going to pay significant more for "works during a hurricane" promotions.

    For these providers it's easier to build a fair weather network and then handle the repair of those networks through insurance. In fact, it's probably a benefit to them because they'll be able replace aging equipment with new gear paid for by their insurance policy.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:More to the point... by Drakino · · Score: 1

      Of course the systems failed because there's no money to be made in building the kind of redundancy into the system that's necessary to keep running.

      If a single standard was used though, it would be a whole lot easier. Imagine if every US cell phone provider used only GSM. The companies could still build their own networks if they didn't want to sign agreements. In a time of disaster, just flip the towers from accepting only Company X to a mode that they accept anyone. Sure, damage will occur to the equipment still, but theres a much higher chance of things continuing to work with multiple towers running the same standard.

      Right now I'm sure area x has perfect Sprint coverage, while another area still has working Cingular service. But the phones between the two are incompatible.

      The other advantage of such a standard would be that providers could pitch in a small bit of money towards a disaster resilant network and everyone would benefit.

    2. Re:More to the point... by TGK · · Score: 1

      I don't know enough about cell phones to comment on this post technically, but the concept sounds reasonable.

      The only question I'd have is this -- if my phone can't pick up a native signal, doesn't that mean it's roaming? It's not as if it doesn't work.

      I guess I need more background on how cell service works in this country. Any advice on places to start?

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    3. Re:More to the point... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Is there any technical reason why any cellphone company couldn't fit a trailer with a generator, a tower, and a cellphone repeater?? Tow/fly it to a disaster area, find some stable high ground and crank up the tower. It wouldn't be very big investment (per truck or trailer), and the return would be enormous in terms of lives saved. It might even be possible to get a tax write-off.

      There's usually plenty of warning about hurricanes, even if the exact track isn't totally predictable. Repeater trailers could be stationed outside the ground zero area and airlifted in, or driven if the roads are OK.

    4. Re:More to the point... by mibus · · Score: 1

      Is there any technical reason why any cellphone company couldn't fit a trailer with a generator, a tower, and a cellphone repeater?? Tow/fly it to a disaster area, find some stable high ground and crank up the tower. It wouldn't be very big investment (per truck or trailer), and the return would be enormous in terms of lives saved. It might even be possible to get a tax write-off.

      Just cost. I'm fairly certain it wouldn't be as cheap as you think though, and you'd need quite a few for any real coverage (portable bases have much lower range than conventional ones, and they aren't great to start with).

    5. Re:More to the point... by rkrabath · · Score: 1

      They do do this.

      They had one setup here in Milwaukee for Summerfest.

      While that's not an emergency, I'm sure something of that nature is on the way to the Gulf as I type this.

      --
      Who do I have to blackmail to get some representation around here!?!?!?!?
    6. Re:More to the point... by llefler · · Score: 1

      Is there any technical reason why any cellphone company couldn't fit a trailer with a generator, a tower, and a cellphone repeater??

      COWs and COLTs.

      http://www.wins-news.com/top_stories/2005/jun/0606 05-c.php

      Sprint made the local news in KC recently when they tested their systems. I'm kind of surprised the media hasn't mentioned them being used now.

      Part of the problem is logistics. You have to keep your trucks safe, but you need to get them in the area as quickly as possible afterward. I'm sure the roads in an out of the area are packed. Then some places just aren't going to be accessible. I suppose you could bring some in by helicopter, but that would compete with rescue operations.

      I did see an article that said Sprint's towers were running on batteries. And cingular had brought in around 500 generators.

      But then, CNN is reporting that the 911 systens are overloaded too. So who ya gonna call?

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    7. Re:More to the point... by kv9 · · Score: 1
      But then, CNN is reporting that the 911 systens are overloaded too. So who ya gonna call?

      GHOST-BUSTERS!!!

    8. Re:More to the point... by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Or it cold be because the cel equipment is under a flood that is concisered the worst-case scenario for that area.
      Verizon wireless has a habit of sending out internal newsletters. During the hurricanes in Florida and such they always had a big commentary on "Our communications are still up", etc. This time the letter went out with "Services are down because the equipment is under water. We can't supply a tentative date because we can't get to the equipment to check it's status, because it's under water."
      (btw, not direct quotes, I don't work for VerizonWireless, my sig other does)

      In any case, my guess is they do have something better than "fair-weather" equipment. However, no matter how far up the tower you put your dish, you still have equipment down below under the tower...so apparently they didn't buy the "hurricane proof, waterproof to 2 meters underwater, with attached generator" equipment. They should be ashamed of themselves...

      --
      Whee signature.
    9. Re:More to the point... by Drakino · · Score: 1

      This Wikipedia entry should get you started. It shows what each cell phone provider around the world uses. Under the technology section, it will have links to each of the protocols.

      In general, a phone only supports one major protocol. So a GSM phone can only see GSM signals (and to further confuse things, there are 4 major GSM frequencies that can be used, while most GSM phones only support 2 to 3 of these). A CDMA phone only works on a CDMA network, etc.

      Roaming means your phone sees a compatible network to what it supports, but cannot find your exact provider. If Cingular and T-Mobile didn't have a roaming agreement, my T-Mobile phone could still use Cingulars GSM network, but would be "roaming" and I would be charged for it.

      Analog roaming is another common term, and some phones contain support for a newer digital standard, and an older analog standard. Whenever it can't find a digital network, it then seeks out an older analog network tower. Remember the suitcase portable phones of the 80's? Those were all analog, and the networks actually still exist. They are however still very expensive, and analog roaming usually hits your wallet hard.

    10. Re:More to the point... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      I would think that rescue services would benefit enough from the extra communications with victims that there'd be no argument about airlifting in the trucks. Plus, the helicopters would be used both directions, carrying victims out of the area.

      As for calling people, I think I read that someone hit by Katrina was able to get a call through to Tulsa, and thereby get a rescue team in to dig them out. Personally, if I knew *anyone* outside the disaster area, I'd call them if I couldn't get 911. Notifying *somebody* will always increase your chances of getting rescued.

    11. Re:More to the point... by llefler · · Score: 1

      Plus, the helicopters would be used both directions, carrying victims out of the area.

      Nice idea, but two different types of helicopters. The ones that can do the rescues don't have the lift capacity. And the ones that could lift, rarely have passenger space. The light trucks are 1 tons (~6500 lbs), plus tower, cell, and generator. The larger ones are semi trailers.

      Then of course, you have the wonderful looters to contend with. It would suck to lift a truck in, put the tower into operation, then have it go dark the following night because some moron stole the generator or gasoline.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  53. ZONK, this borders on trolling!!.. ;) by Halvy · · Score: 0

    why can't all the people of a city make contact during an emergency?

    Uhhhh, for the same reason us 6.5 billions citizens of mother earth let a hand full of scumbags ruin everything else in our lives?

    --
    I will gladly loose all of life's battles.. in order to win the war..
  54. Capitolism by xmorg · · Score: 1

    AS a capitolist, i would have to say that one of our downsides is that we dont "do it right the first time", because its not financially expediant.

    Cell Towers: Built not for emergancies but to "cover" as many people as possible to make as much money as possible.

    Communication wires: IT would cost way to much money, to dig, and plant wiring deep underground. Since nobody would profit from it, and since the government will probably bail out the communication companies so they can put up the same wires above ground, if wires do not become obsolete in the next hundred years, the same problem will occour.

    Power Grid: Ancient power grid, and would cut into power companies profits to upgrade to a failsafe system, (much like the above communications) or underground nukes, and wires.

  55. Really? by doormat · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine has been able to get text messages out of Biloxi, MS (he is OK, thank God!). Now they're struggling to find the closest operational airport to get them back home (they were contract workers - were because what they were working on is now decimated).

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  56. 212 Calling 504 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Informative

    In NYC after the 9/11/2001 planebombs blew up the World Trade Center, including the vast telecom infrastructure centered in 7 World Trade, phone service was crippled. But for the city government, that lasted only a couple of days. The City's IT department ("DoITT") took an in-house VoIP experiment, and prematurely deployed it to over 50,000 of the City government's 75,000 desk phones. They actually worked a few blocks from the smoke-choked Ground Zero to install telecom servers over existing TCP/IP LANs. Which gave not only dialtone, but the conferencing, connectivity and security demanded by that unprecedented crisis. The next several weeks saw the high performance of that emergency replacement, coping with the vast weight of the telecom organizing the city's recovery from the catastrophe.

    New Orleans ain't New York City. I lived there, too, and I know it's hardly "Silicon Alley": It's Carbon Swamp. The telecom services there aren't really comparable to NYC's, even on leisurely good days. But the Big Easy could take a lesson from the Big Apple, just as all cities can. We proved that disaster recovery can be highly effective, and those results are available to the world. These scale disasters are becoming more frequent. People should become familiar with techniques for coping with them now, before the crisis, when planning and preparation can be done on one's own schedules, and not merely the best one can do when disaster strikes.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:212 Calling 504 by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      The big problem there is that everything is submerged, including the pumps that are supposed to pump the water out. It is freakin hard to bootstrap such a mess. You cannot just turn the power back on either, cause you'll electrocute the emergency workers. Even the downtown areas that are presently dry could still flood, due to a lack of pumping ability. Only once the water is out, can people start to fix the communications.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:212 Calling 504 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Basically true. Of course, New Orleans and the Red Cross can prepare for the aftermath of the inevitable next hurricane by investing in wireless equipment for the emergency response teams. Which also include buildings full of workers, who can operate out of trailers, and even in generator-powered buildings in the city. WiFi might not cut it for VoIP (latency, bandwidth), but there are several other wireless techs that can, including dedicated bandwidth for first responders. NYC is leading development of those techs, too, including WiMax deployments for the Fire Department off the Empire State Building (and elsewhere, for redundancy). New Orleans can pick which model is most appropriate for its local disaster planning.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:212 Calling 504 by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      But for the city government, that lasted only a couple of days. The City's IT department ("DoITT") took an in-house VoIP experiment, and prematurely deployed it to over 50,000 of the City government's 75,000 desk phones.

      I was up in CT in college on 9/11/2001 when the planes hit. Around the time second plane hit the WTC I gave my parents a call (who live about 20 miles south of the Pentagon) telling them to turn on the news and that it diddn't matter which one. That was the last time I was able to call them for the next day or so as all longdistance circuits into the DC area were either full (likely) or retasked under emergency measures to the federall government (also likely). The only way to I got in contact with the was over AIM.

      The internet is turning/has turned into a backup communications system for the US. Unfortunately, it probably wouldn't help as much here. With lack of power, the equipment wont run and battery backups/generators would cut out to prevent shortcircuits due to flodding. Power over Ethernet has a distance limitation with it.

      About the best thing to do here might be to bury all the powerlines in the area so they won't cut out with high winds and rain. Also, a fibre buildout of the phone lines (which is being worked on anyway) and the cities own communication system would help. Main problem is keeping power to the routers and the equipment dry. All possible, but all fairly expensive.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    4. Re:212 Calling 504 by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Do you have details and/or can you point me to someone who does?

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    5. Re:212 Calling 504 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You can contact (and search) DoITT starting at their Website. The Tech Committee that oversees them mentioned the VoIP replacement job to which I referred in their 2003 hearing report (footnote on page 8). It's also mentioned in page 6 of Vermont's 2005 Telecommunications Plan, which quotes an article in the _Homeland Defense Journal_ July 2003 p. 37). Believe it or not, you might be able to get a followup call from a knowledgeable DoITT person by calling 311 inside NYC (DoITT's "nonemergency 911"), or +1(212)NEW-YORK anywhere. If you can't get DoITT to prioritize responding to you, you could try contacting the Technology in Government committee, which oversees DoITT and sometimes has info like this prepackaged - especially if you're an NYC resident/worker or another municipal government.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  57. A Huge Aerial Shot of Hurricane Katrina... by antdude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Big shot. It is 6200x8000 pixels and 8.4 MB big. Amazing how clear and big we can get with today's satellites.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:A Huge Aerial Shot of Hurricane Katrina... by Hays · · Score: 1

      The entire right side of that picture seems to be "out of focus". Clearly that's not what actually happened since it's all more or less infinite focus, but I wonder why the resolution is so different.

    2. Re:A Huge Aerial Shot of Hurricane Katrina... by Dausha · · Score: 1

      No disrespect, but that's only 30m/pixel. Digital globe has ~3m/pixel in color. That would be something to see . . .

      Ben

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  58. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    a storm blows away peoples wooden houses and they complain that they cant get a fricking cell service
    and the world is falling ? LOL you can see why this story is now just a footnote on the daily news in the rest of the world with attitudes like that, America used up its sympathy card a long time ago, now nobody really gives a shit and certainly are not donating cash, see Dick&George for an advance this time

    in the mean time thousands, not hundreds but thousands of people died in Africa today through lack of food and disease (they dont know what houses even are) yet none carries that story at all, yeah we are civilized countries LOL.

    perhaps this storm was just payback from the folks who have been praying hard in Iraq/Iran/Syria/Sudan/Cambodia/Palestine/Cuba/Vene zuala/Afganistan /NKorea etc etc etc

    sleep tight

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Halvy · · Score: 0

      ..America used up its sympathy card a long time ago, now nobody really gives a..

      I agree alot with what you say..

      But you have to admit, it is really not 'americans' fault.

      I mean unless we go after these scumbags in power-- and I don't mean by voting or writing letters, nothing is going to change.

      And even tho I probably have one of the biggest mouths around, even I'll admit that it is asking alot of people to take those first steps that will be required to remove them from power (not without much, much tragedy)..

      :(

      --
      I will gladly loose all of life's battles.. in order to win the war..
  59. Only in emergencies? by burtdub · · Score: 0

    With my cell phone, I can hardly make contact under normal circumstances. %&#* T-Mobile.

  60. Re:Yet another reason by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

    0? im in RI and we had gloria in the early 80s and bob in 92 or 91. And other smaller ones

    I've never seen a tornado though

    Anyway, whenever theres hurricanes i always hope they come and hit RI. I like worrying about my life/property. Life is boring without the fear of losing it all.

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  61. In a word, greed. by vik · · Score: 1

    If cellphones were designed for the benefit of the user, they would be able to communicate with each other directly, bypassing the towers. Sure, the range would not be fantastic, but relays etc. would fix that.

    Of course, cellphones are designed for the benefit of the consumer - in this case the telcos, not the end user - you. If our phones called each other direct, telcos don't get to clip the ticket and make their bucks. So we get a service that only works when they do.

    Oh the joys of the "free market", where the feedback from market forces encourages the creation of dumb, pliable consumers, churned out to order by the state. Come the revolution...

    Vik :v)

    1. Re:In a word, greed. by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Of course, cellphones are designed for the benefit of the consumer - in this case the telcos, not the end user - you. If our phones called each other direct, telcos don't get to clip the ticket and make their bucks. So we get a service that only works when they do.

      I have unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile minutes. Cingular offers it for all nationwide plans, starting at $40/month.

    2. Re:In a word, greed. by Lovejoy · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on! That's just silly. Bad things happen in the world that aren't caused by greed. And just because any given theoretical problem could be solved with unlimited resources doesn't mean that we should spend unlimited resources solving that problem.

      Telcos don't do what you suggest because:
      1.) It would be expensive to consumers
      2.) It would be VERY confusing for consumers, most of whom don't even know that their cell phones are actually radios
      3.) The benefit to consumers would be very slight. Relays would do nothing for situations like NOLA or southern Mississippi because of chokepoints. Relaying would only work if ONE tower went down, not if ALL of them go down, or if EVERYONE wants to use the phone.
      Thus:
      4.) Consumers don't want it

      There are lots of radios designed for point-to-point contact. You can go to Target or Tesco or whatever store you've got where you live and pick up a couple.

      We have a couple at my house just for such situations, and all of the offices at my work have one for the same reason. I'll bet you have some too, dontcha, vik?

      Cell service is a different model, and the cost to consumers of implementing a peer to peer system would be quite high, I imagine. I don't want this service (I've got my radio, remember) and I don't want to pay for my cell phone to function like a traditional radio. I certainly don't want to talk my mom through a peer to peer cell phone call either. Phew!

      Not EVERYTHING is the fault of the EEEVIL corporations. But cell phone companies do suck. I'll give you that.

    3. Re:In a word, greed. by vik · · Score: 1

      Uh, they don't connect directly to the other guy's phone. There's this tower in the middle...

      Vik :v))

    4. Re:In a word, greed. by vik · · Score: 1

      No, it darn well is not silly. You said it, I can pick up little handhelds dead cheap - they come in handy on family outings and firegrounds.

      Now, you need to explain to me why giving a cellphone this functionality would cost so damn much when I can actually buy it for the cost of a 6-pack (and half of that is the cost of the battery and charger).

      Consumers will be confused, undoubtedly. The average one seems to stare at boxes of orange juice that says ""concentrate".

      Chokepoints? That's what mesh is for. I can see that relaying would not be generally used, but having it available is desirable for civil emergencies when the cell sites are down.

      I completely disagree with you that consumers don't want this service. Not paying for calls to the immediate area is a great bonus, particularly for EMS workers, tradespeople (think of builders on a building site) and mall-rats to name just a few. The desire for this is even stronger in areas where coverage just sucks.

      Vik :v)

    5. Re:In a word, greed. by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Uh, they don't connect directly to the other guy's phone. There's this tower in the middle...

      Yes, but your reasoning was that the cell phone company does this so they can get the revenue.

      There is no additional revenue from mobile-to-mobile, even for mobile-to-mobile across the US.

    6. Re:In a word, greed. by vik · · Score: 1

      The rest of the world is a little different.

      Vik :v)

  62. Link to looting Article by Loether · · Score: 1
    --
    TODO create witty sig.
  63. This just in... by merreborn · · Score: 1

    ...the Plain Old Telephone System frequently fails in disasters as well!

  64. The ECRV by Fubar · · Score: 1

    The article mentions the Emergency Communications Response Vehicles (ECRV) and as someone who has been trained how to operate the systems and vehicle, lemme tell ya, it rocks.

    The Excursions were donated by Ford and the labor unions and all the equipment was donated by the manufactures, which means no money donated to the Red Cross via the website or phone bank was used.

    The operation is really simple. Pull up to any location that needs external communications, point the dish (all 9 ECRV's and stand alone sat systems share 1 T1's worth a bandwidth - although I'm sure more has been allocated during this disaster). Each ECRV has 10 VoIP phones and 10 laptops with 2 WAPs available to deploy (one is permanently mounted in the truck, the other can be run into a building).

    There is also a JPS ACU-1000 cross-connect machine installed that ties all the amateur, FEMA and Red Cross radios together (HF, low band, VHF and UHF are all covered).

    Here's some more info on the truck (be kind, they have no idea you're coming).

  65. Registrar vs. Katrina by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    New Orleanes Registrar vs. Katrina.

    DirectNIC.com, a registrar and host which is based in New Orleans, evacuated the majority of their personnel. The skeleton staff that remained spent a great deal of effort battling broken windows, incoming water, and flying debris, from their high-rise office and data center. Their hosting and registration services remained online and worked flawlessly however they are currently running on a back-up diesel generator. From their website "Please understand that with the aforementioned power outage, and the fact that travelling to and from our offices (on the 11th floor) is somewhat restricted, responses
    to customer support issues might take a little longer than normal to be addressed
    ...You've
    heard of 'bullet-proof hosting'? directNIC.com is now proudly able to prove that their services are literally 'hurricane-proof'."

    Their blog
    and photos of this event were featured on CNN.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:Registrar vs. Katrina by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Until they run out of diesel fuel. The odds are good they will run out before additional fuel can be trucked in.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  66. I can see your house from here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    oh wait, no i can't

    anymore !!

  67. Satellite 9-1-1 by batmanuel · · Score: 1

    Does the FCC require satellite phone services route 9-1-1 dialed calls to the nearest emergency dispatch, a la VoIP and POTS?

  68. Motorola BPL equipment by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

    The W1AW ham station at ARRL headquarters is testing new BPL equpiment that offers practically no inteference on ham HF bands. See how great things can work when groups learn to work together instead of just pointing their fingers at each other and yelling?

    As a HAM with nothing but dialup access easily available, this is greatly encouraging. I just hope that the hams in the gulf states can mobilize quickly to start emergency communications. Fast internet connectivity dosen't seem very important when many people cannot find clean water, food or even dry land.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  69. /. has been watching too much concrete media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why Edison's concrete houses didn't sell well.

    --
    The "are you a script" word for today is dinosaur.

  70. Re:Yet another reason by wooley-one · · Score: 1

    *cough* blizzards *cough*

  71. Re:Yet another reason by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    I live in the south, and any hurricane that reaches where I am is just a heavy thunderstorm. Repeat after me: the entire South is not Florida!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  72. How telephone networks are powered ----- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's obvious most of the poster's don't know much about LAND line networks -----
    First of all they're DC powered -- The power from the network comes from an AC powered DC rectifier Plant which is backed up by batteries and in certain cases gas powered generators. This ofcourse depends on the type of telecom site it is: opamp, switch, etc....Most switch sites or Central Offices will have generators and batteries.....
    Typically, a network is engineered to operate on standby power a total 8-12hrs via battery back-up - this will vary by telecom company, but that would be typical telecom standard...The land-line communications have historically been the most reliable technical network out there - more than power, cable, etc...
    Then you have the issue of how the transmission/switch networks are engineered for avg. demand - which leads to busy signals...They'll typically engineer a Digital Line Carrier(DLC) to have one available line for 1 in every 8 households with service. When there is more than 1 in 8 people trying to use the phone you receive a busy signal...
    Cell sites work in the same fashion in terms of avg. demand...Their stand-by power design however is less robust, because the sites are typically smaller, they have less battery back-up - 6hrs or less and usually no dedicated back-up generator - -they will use roll-up generators if any at all...Therefore, they are more likely to lose power and less relible...
    Also- if you have a land line phone and use a wireless phone - no power, no phone. The answer is get an analog phone - because it will work in the event of a power outage....unless ofcourse the telephone networks standby has run out of battery power.....
    Bottomline - people can't call because the central offices/cell sites are flooded, lost power, ran out of power or lines have been damaged by high winds....

    Can't communicate without power - unless it's smoke signals....Chief.

  73. Re:Yet another reason by Xenious · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the frickin' cold! hehe brrrrrrr

    --
    -Xen
  74. Geeks 4TW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quickly, divert the money for better levees and pumps to more cell phone towers! That will save us!

    *pushes up glasses*

  75. Cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In this age of cheap commoditized consumer electronics and advanced mobile technology"

    I think "cheap" may be the operative word...

    Steve

  76. Carriers do this on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obvious to anyone who gives it 2 seconds of thought is the fact that cell phone carriers do their switching on computer systems which recognize the calling phone. In a disaster condition, when available circuits are overwhelmed, the switching computers are programmed to ignore citizen attempts to complete calls in favor of providing service to designated emergency service provider phones.

  77. Re:Yet another reason by wooley-one · · Score: 1

    Florida: Hurricanes, Fires (rarely) California: Fires, Mudslides, Pacific Cyclones, Earthquakes, etc. Plus, Florida has fewer Californians. FL>CA

  78. from the blatantly economics department ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Phone networks are engineered for predicted average demand. This level is occasionally exceeded during regular use. The demand for communications during an event such as hurricane Katrina skyrockets. To build a network capable of satisfying these peak demands would multiply the average user's bill, and few people would sign up."

    Gosh darn it. How dare you expose one of slashdot's weak points? Next thing you know, you'll be poking holes in our legal knowledge.

  79. That's my experience... by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what my friend has, but I've got Sprint PCS (proprietary US service) which got all out of whack because I activated the phone from one area code, but immediately took a vacation and setup the voicemail from another. So the voicemail notification messages kept being sent to the vacation area code for routing by the home address but "home" wasn't there so I never got notified.

    The sound of the customer service rep's head bashing against the wall gave me the impression I wasn't the only one who had done this.

  80. Re:VoIP by ces · · Score: 1

    Amazingly the internet is one of the few communications links working in the area.

    There have been some people posting online from SE Louisiana, and a few web sites located in the area are still up and handling the traffic.

    --
    Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  81. Lousiana has some of the worst infrastructure... by stox · · Score: 1

    in the country. You may remember the recent headlines where they finally wired a Lousiana town for POTS service, for the first time. Maybe this will be a wakeup call for some of the officials down there.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  82. New Orleans and water mix too well by CajunLuke · · Score: 1

    They need to drain the city to get the power back on, they need power to drive the pumps to drain the city...

    Actually, many of the pumps are diesel/electric and can use either. They also have tanks of diesel fuel to keep the pumps running for about a week.

    I always thought that the biggest hazard to New Orleans was the Mississippi overflowing, since they had two 100-year flood seasons back to back in the last decade.

    Actually, that isn't anywhere near the problem it used to be. If the Mississippi gets too high (and we get two weeks notice, as they start to measure water height at Cairo, where the Missouri and Mississppi meet. If the water gets too high, they can route more water into the Atchafalaya (normally 30% of the Mississippi goes into the Atchafalya; they can put up to 60% of the Mississippi into the Atchafalaya before Morgan City has problems), and if they still have too mush water, they open the Bonnet Carré Spillway, which can let up to 40% of the water straight into Lake Pontchartrain.

    1. Re:New Orleans and water mix too well by jcr · · Score: 1

      if they still have too mush water, they open the Bonnet Carré Spillway, which can let up to 40% of the water straight into Lake Pontchartrain.

      Hmm.. I wonder how much higher and wider the levees around Lake Ponchartrain will be after this?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:New Orleans and water mix too well by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      The Ohio river meets the Mississipi at Cairo, Illinois. The Missouri meets the Mississipi at St. Louis, Missouri, which is upstream from Cairo.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:New Orleans and water mix too well by CajunLuke · · Score: 1

      Thanks - I got them mixed up.

  83. SMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instead of trying to retain full voice, wouldn't it be better to just limit none essential mobiles to text? Then the system could survive on far fewer base stations, but retain some communications for all. You can surely get many more text messages through the network than voice.

  84. No f'ing way dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ham Radio
     
      Do I even need to say it?


    No way dude!

    I need my cheap broadband Internet over power lines much more importantly than anyone's disaster communications.

    PS: This is brutal sarcasm... for the humor impaired

    I am a Ham and just wanted to bluntly get this message accross, since so many Slashdotters always like to dis the Hams every time a new broadband-over-powerlines related story comes out.

    1. Re:No f'ing way dude... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Your post just inspired this new quote from me:

      "With BPL, no one can hear you scream!"

      You're welcome,

      Miater Transistor

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  85. A Rather Prescient Article-Stupid Humans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Be as blunt as you want, and grab a map while you're at it. Holland is below sea level. Bad place for a country. Some cities in Italy are below sea level. Stupid Italians. How many times have we heard about parts of India getting flooded (usually the poorest parts). Stupid citizens. The fact is that a lot of cities and towns are either below sea level, or in flood plains (Mississippi). While were doing "stupid". How about those places were people live next to a volcano? Or right over a fault line? Stupid humans. Anyone remember "Love Canal"? Stupid humans living on top of that.

    --
    The "are you a script" word for today is floods.

  86. The solution is peer to peer. by elucido · · Score: 1

    A peer to peer wireless network would solve everything. If the entire city were connected to wifi, and the city installed an emergy network in which the city could communiate with every single cellphone or wifi device, and every wifi device could communicate with the city, msgs could be transfered in and out. Even if they just upload the msgs to the cities server and then they get forwarded online somewhere, the msgs would get out. People would be able to communicate.

    1. Re:The solution is peer to peer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL Best "Stupid Tech Person" Troll EVER!

  87. Negative Publicity Could Elminate Profit by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    I know, I know, any publicity is good publicity, but what will happen is that the news will report on this company making profit off of others peoples misery and a majority of people will have a negative opinion of said company and possibly take their business elsewhere.

    1. Re:Negative Publicity Could Elminate Profit by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      They don't have to charge extra for it. They would possibly get extra customers by the impession giving them teh impressions they're in a position to provide more reliable service, even in adverse conditions.

      In addition, they have the people roaming to their towers. Let's assume, conservatively, that they charge a rate of 5/minute to the other carriers for supporting roaming customers. Let's also assume, conservatively, that a truck can support 50 simultaneous calls, and half those will be roaming calls. In a twelve-hour day, that's $900 per truck.

      Sure, it's not anwhere near enough to pay for the truck, but the numbers are most likely much bigger. Then, start considering that this tecnology would be worthwhile for certain special events that involve large masses of people. What about festivals that are held in remote areas? What about periodic fill-in service when a permanent tower fails? By the time you factor in happier customers, incoming roaming, and reduced outgoing roaming, it may make a lot of fiscal sense to do it with no additional, explicit charges.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    2. Re:Negative Publicity Could Elminate Profit by dunc78 · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that citizens would want this service provided for free, they would see charging roaming to people that had just lost everything pretty insensitive. What I see eventually happening would be that they would have to cave to public opinion and they would have these trucks that wouldn't generate revenue, but would be seen as more of a charity. Now, they would be useful for festivals in remote areas, but I think it would be seen as bad taste to have them used for profit in areas that were just decimated.

    3. Re:Negative Publicity Could Elminate Profit by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      The roaming customers would not be paying for it, at least not directly. With my provider, if I'm inside my "home" area, and regardless of whether my phone says it's roaming or not, I don't get billed for roaming minutes. I'm sure the phone company does, though.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  88. Re:Yet another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many slack-jawed niggers in the south. At least here on the west coast, they're slowly eliminating themselves through shooting eachother, and just generally being stupid niggers.

  89. Re:Yet another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, every place has it's problems, but for the record, the blackout didn't reach chicago.

  90. Breaker, breaker good buddy by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    What about Citizen's Band?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  91. Link to looting Article-Non-essentials. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing communications are down, or they'd grab some eDonkey links while they're at it.

  92. This is a silly question that requires a profound by williamyf · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...Answer...

    Lets see:

    The Thelephone Systemm is designed with statistical multiplexing in mind (extremely simplified explanation: the capacity is that of what is expected in the peak hour as an average) but the system is not able to fullfill EVERY SINGLE REQUEST from EVERY SINGLE USER at the same time. For those interested, the capasity is derived from Earlang tables (link for the Danish Matematician: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agner_Krarup_Erlang/ Link for the unit and calculations in telecoms: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erlang_unit/)

    Mobile systems, being telecom systems, are designed along the same lines, but allowing for mobility. That is why, when there is rush hour, or when there is a concert, or when there are demonstartions (in my country, Venezuela, at least) it was hard to get throug. With Mobile systems, you have two choke points. The antena itself (Called BTS in GSM terms, I will use GSM terminology because I worked for 6 years in various positions and capacities the field), and the switch itself (MSC, again in GSM Terms). Normaly you engineer the system so that the blocking rate due to the MSC is many times lower that the blocking rate due to the BTSs (RF)

    If everybody tries to call 911 at the same time, or call their relatives, or receive a call from relatives, the system will not be able to cope. Add to that the fact that many BTSs (and other infrastructure) will be out of service due to the following reasons:
    - The Towers/Antenae themselves are damaged
    - The tower/antenae are ok, but the Microwave links between them and the MSC (BSCs and transcoders taken into account) are missaligned due to the wind.
    - ADSL Links to the BTSs not working.
    - Lack of power
    - Equipment destroyed (A tree falls on the shellter damaging the electronics, but the antena is ok. It happens. Once One of our BTSs was out because some moron fired at the shelter, and the bullet perforated a Satellite modem).
    - et cetera

    Now you begin to see the challenge here.

    Is not that there is nothing to be done. In GSM you have a copuple of tricks down your Sleeve. First, you can activate a mode known as Half-Rate. This will decrease the datarate of a voicecall, from aprox 13.3Kbps to aprox 6.7Kbps. The voicequality will suffer, but the (remaining) Capacity of the radiofrequency system will be doubled, just like that!.

    The second thing that can be done is to put the system in Emergency mode. In this mode, Some calls get priority over the others. That is to say, police, firefigthers, goverment oficials, the phones of the people that work for the operator, and calls alerady stablished to the emergency number (911 in USA, 121 in europe, 127 here in venezuela) get priority over all other calls, allowing the relief personnel to better coordinate their efforts.

    I do not know what can be done in the CDMA200 1xRTT world, but I am sure there are some tricks for them as well.

    Here in Venezuela (and in Colombia, where I also worked), we have very bad Electrical systems, so many of our BTSs (and all of our BSCs and MSCs) have battery backup power AND motogenerators, giving them an autonomy of Two or more days (until the Diesel fuel dries out). In a situation like that of Katrina, it may not be possible to replenish the fuel. But to make it worse, in america the electric system is so good, that is dificult to justify the use of motogenerators in the BTSs themselves, but just in critical pieces of equipment. So, after some hours, is goodbye to the cell system. The MSC may Still work, and the BSCs. The SMSs that your family sends you from the other side of the globe will be received, and will be stored in the SMSC server, but will not get to you because there will be no towers on. GAME OVER.

    So, is not the ubiquity of the equipment, but a design focused on availability and disaster handling that will allow you to be able to stay comunicated during time

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  93. Emergency call system for disasters, etc by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    http://gets.ncs.gov/

    This is what the infamous 710 area code is for.

    I don't know how well it actually works or if it is being used for this disaster.

    Anyone know if it was used on 9/11?

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  94. Silicon Valley and the 1989 Earthquake by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Silicon Valley did OK in the 1989 M6.9 Loma Prieta Earthquake. There were power outages and work holidays the first couple of days. However the InterNet and computers were mostly up the day after. I was sending emails and get earthquake data across the InterNet the following day. The graphical world wide web was not yet operational in the 1980s, so mostly was ftps, usenet and email.
    The 1989 was considered a medium-large quake. The Maximum quake could be as much as 1.3 magnitudes high and about fifty times more energetic.
    A hurricane is different. Its harder for electrical networks to stay operation during large scale flooding. Likewise, the storm that hit New Orleans is by no means the largest possible.

  95. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame I don't have moderator points; you're spot-on.

  96. Free iPods! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And other geek goodies at electronics stores throughout the greater New Orleans area!

    Put your waders on and hurry!

    This is a LIMITED TIME OFFER!

    Tomorrow the police and National Guard start shooting!

  97. What about all those AT&T Microwave towers? by John+Whorfin · · Score: 1

    Remember the /. story a while back where AT & T was dumping those squat microwave towers? They were designed to withstand a near atomic blast, weren't they?

    Seems kinda silly to not have continued to use those, especially in areas where Mother Nature tends to be a bit vindictive.

  98. Jericho Iteration by guinsu · · Score: 1

    Did anyone read Allen Steele's Jericho Iteration? I just got his weird feeling that NO could turn out like St Louis in the book. Refugees stuck for months on end, a wide division between haves and have nots, heavy-handed government and police tactics.

  99. Technology is secondary by mr.warmth · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the TV show said, we have the technology. It's a business decision how to deploy it. Can you run your business by having enough capacity for rare peak demand? Probably not. In the 2003 blackout, cellphones failed not because of the electricity outage but because people saturated the network. Such events happen rarely. Presumably those who really need to communicate (ie emergency services) in those situations have the means to do so outside of commercial channels. For private companies, it may not be reasonable or possible to accomodate the event when EVERYONE is dialing at the same time.

    This is not limited to natural disasters and other such situations. I have a beach house. When the weather is not so nice, my cellphone works fine there. When it's beautiful, it doesn't work so well because a large amount of people have flooded to the beach and there isn't enough local capacity for them. Why people are yammering away on the beach instead of enjoying themselves is beyond me. Or maybe they just have a boss like me.

  100. Hacked by CHINESE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try GOOGLE JABBER. It is proactively ENHANCED with the exciting new technology ADWORDS. You can use it with your APPLE aqua blue dildo shaped ICOCK music player/cell phone. Don't get slack, get COCKED while sipping your LATTE while your PREGNANT wife holds a KNIFE to your THROAT. OMG, the BLOGOSPHERE just had a COREDUMP all over my PODCAST.

  101. Hurricane Watch Net was very active by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on 20 Meters. See http://www.hwn.org/

  102. i wouldn't have guessed by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

    when did the red cross become hightech?

  103. Hurricane-Proof House by serutan · · Score: 1

    A couple months ago on Slashdot there was a story about a concrete and steel house in Florida whose owner claimed it was hurricane-proof. I wonder if he had a chance to find out?

    1. Re:Hurricane-Proof House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Thank you for pointing this out:

      Here is a link to an excellent firm that builds these houses: Lets see if anyone of them surivived!

      http://www.scrapbookscrapbook.com/DAC-ART/index.ht ml

      Yours,
      Killmofasta

  104. On the local news radio station by joeflies · · Score: 1
    On the local radio station here in the bay area (KGO 810) this morning, they were reporting the exact opposite - that the communications systems performed remarkably well considering the conditions.

    Because of the coverage in cell towers, many people were able to continue to communicate during the storm. In fact, many people were using the SMS system to communicate.

    THey also mentioned that the Internet functioned remarkably well, as it has the capabilities to route communications around trouble areas. Not sure what they were referring to, but it was brought up.

  105. communication infrastructure and manpower in iraq by rumen21 · · Score: 1
    I surprised I have not seen anything mentioned about how the Iraq war is affecting our ability to respond to this disaster.

    The military has easily deployable satellite communication equipment. Effective communication is critical in terms of responding to this type of disaster.

    Because the domestic communication infrastructure is not designed to handle this type of disaster we are forced to rely on Helicopters, Watercrafts and National Guard to gain access to the affected areas.

    I am sure that there are deployable Cell Towers with Satellite uplinks. Where is this equipment? Where is the expertise to quickly deploy it?

    I am tired of the sugar coating I hear on CNN, Fox News etc. Having the military commanders on the major news channels discussing how they have all the manpower and equipment they need to respond to the disaster is bullshit.

    With so many National Guard and emergency equipment over seas, was the United States prepared for this disaster?

  106. Actually they're designed for "five nines". by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    The networks are not designed for theoretical maximum capacity, they are designed for average peak observed capacity.

    Actually they're designed for "five nines" - a .00001 percent or lower probability of certain types of failures. (I don't recall if that includes the probability of a particular call failing to go thorugh, but they try to keep that low, too. A bigger concern is to keep calls that went through from dropping off...)

    They do plan to have enough extra capacity to handle peaks - like MINOR disasters, traffic jams, and various events that both knock out some of their equipment and get lots of people calling at the same time.

    But trying to put in enough stuff to handle the sinking of a city the size of New Orleans by a hurricaine, which also knocks down towers, floods equipment rooms, curbside boxes, and other infrastructure, breaks cables and fibers in many places simultaneously, smashes buildings - including switching centers, drops ALL power so ALL equipment is running on backup for weeks, etc., while simultaneously putting EVERYBODY on the phone, is beyond the pale.

    As with California earthquakes, the surviving equipment tries to meter the remaining capacity by such measures as "slow dialtone". But some people are going to get cut off completely, and some may be delayed fatally. Can't be helped.

    But it has always been this way, or even more so: Kennedy assassination took out the phone service country-wide as EVERYBODY tried to call someone to talk about it. (Main thing I remember about the assasination was the phone failure.) Storms - even a small tornado - would short enough wires to make enough phones look "off-hook" to tie up all the line-finders, and with the calls handled by relays rather than computers the line-finders would STAY on the shorted lines until a human arrived to intervene, hours later. So nobody real got a dialtone. And so on.

    And imagine what it was like when calls were placed by operators - with several parties on most linse and a limited number of cables in the switchboard to connect lines - when everybody wanted to call at once.

    Or before phones...

    Trust me, it's a LOT better now than ever before.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Actually they're designed for "five nines". by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Actually they're designed for "five nines" - a .00001 percent or lower probability ...

      Oops. Meant: A .00001 or lower probability..." or "A 0.001 percent or lower probabilitiy..."

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  107. Re:Yet another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    amen

  108. Blogging from a New Orleans datacenter by zsazsa · · Score: 1

    This guy is blogging from the DirectNIC datacenter in downtown New Orleans. Amazingly, they're still up. He seems to be having a hard time looking for diesel fuel. And then he starts talking about "survivalist hygiene"... He seems serious (to the point of being crazy) about staying there for the long haul.

  109. The key word is "Cheap" by 0-9a-f · · Score: 1

    This is the downside of price-based competition.

    When access devices are cheap, they break easily - but that's okay, because they're easy to replace. 1,000 people each replacing a $100 item is an easy decision.

    When infrastructure is (relatively) cheap, it breaks easily - and that's bad. To service those same 1,000 people, you need one company to justify spending $100,000. Much less likely to happen in a hurry, especially if the company was just scraping by... errr... highly competitive... to begin with.

    Of course, if they'd done it right the first time, and paid a 10% premium up front, there wouldn't have been such a big problem - but from a cashflow perspective it's better to upset 0.01% of your customers for a month every year than it is to have 10% less market coverage.

    --
    With each breath in, a flower somewhere opens; with each breath out, a flower withers away. In between lies beauty.
  110. Communications will never work after disaster by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Communications networks are designed to handle the average traffic load. Shortly after any natural disaster, almost everybody in the country calls into the affected region, ensuring several times the maximum design load, so very few people actually get through. Hopefully, they've gotten a little bit smarter; after Loma Prieta nobody could call out on a cell phone because the phone network delay to get a dial tone increased to the point where the cell sites would simply give up and fail the call every time. (Hopefully they're using an adjustable timeout now). Also, after any disaster, a good portion of the working lines are reserved for emergency services, making it that much harder for anybody else to get through. If you really want to be able to communicate after a disaster, I'd suggest getting a HAM license.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  111. Red Cross IT related relief by mpthompson · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to some good information on the IT related aspects of relief being provided by the Red Cross to the New Orleans area.

  112. Yep, Ham Radio is working... by msauve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and will continue to, at least until BPL destroys all HF communications. http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/08/30/1/?nc= 1

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Yep, Ham Radio is working... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the interference in on the receiving end. The people you want to talk to are the ones who still have power, right?

  113. Peak Demand by drouse · · Score: 1

    The infrastructure isn't geared to anywhere near 100% usage -- even with all of the equipment intact and the power running. I don't even think land line telephone service would be able to take care of nearly everyone wanting to call 911 or a relative.

    I'd doubt any company executive would want to explain to the shareholders why they have enough towers and switches and computers to handle every subscriber using their phones when the percentage 99% of the time is a lot less than 100%.

    Plus more capacity equals more towers equals more resistance to the towers (NIMBY).

    Can anyone find statistics that say what kind of usage the cell companies expect?

    --
    -- I browse at +5 with stripped sigs ... Ha! Ha!
  114. Text Messaging by nigelthellama · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine has family in New Orleans, and while the phones were down, they were able to keep contact by text messaging eachother from their cell phones. Not sure why this worked, but it did...

  115. Communications sys. themselves are not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem lies in things like not having a proper power backup like a generator to keep services functioning when power goes out. Buried leased lines don't usually get taken out during hurricanes so if you have a power supply you can still communicate.

    Our business was taken out for 24 hours during Katrina because we have no generator. If we had we could have gone back to work on Friday morning and not missed a beat. The T1 lines had link and the battery on the alarm kept functioning but without even floodlights or our main servers powered there's nothing much we can do here.

  116. what about P2P-style cell phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that this idea will never be prevailant (because the cell phone companies are the ones that drive the mobile comm market and they want you to bill time on their network), but I think that technology will soon be at a point where P2P cell phones would be more effective and robust. Think of GNU The Onion Router or Freenet style networking with on-the-fly anonymous peering.. only in hardware with blazingly fast spread spectrum transmission.

  117. Zonk Edited my Post!!! by jfourier · · Score: 1

    My original post called for unit to unit text messaging services to be built. Text services! Not for the cell companies to connect millions of phone calls at a time.

  118. P2P Telephony by UbuWu · · Score: 1

    How about p2p telephony like I believe the US army uses in Iraq? The more callers, the better...

  119. Logistics are essential. by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

    To be truthful, things like cell phones, wireless data networks, and satellite links are luxuries in any time or circumstance. All a human needs is food, water, and shelter, right? So why does anyone have a cell phone or computer?

    Speed and accuracy.

    Moving rescue personnel, evacuees, water, food, medicine, and other supplies around is a logistics nightmare. Especially when the roads and airports are covered in debris. Coordinating everything, and getting it out there before the victims die of exposure, is exactly the sort of things communications and computers are built for. Only here, it's lives on the line instead of money.

    Ham radio is great, but just try keeping up-to-date supply inventories using pencil and paper. Or keeping a conversation confidential, so that a hungry mob doesn't swarm the relief trucks before they get to the distribution point.

  120. Grain of salt by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it may have happened, OTOH, in any great disaster strike, many 'fantastic' tales get circulated that turn out to not be true.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Grain of salt by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. But this was a firsthand report, live on the telephone, from the initial ham operator in Tulsa. I'm sure NPR has the transcript. It was today, Aug 30, around 5:30 PM EDT, if you care to look it up.

    2. Re:Grain of salt by stevew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'll find the story up on www.ARRL.org. Is that authentic enough for you?

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
  121. How is this modded insightful? by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is such an asshole comment. New Orleans was created because 200+ years ago we didn't have roads to get everywhere and the best way to transport goods was to float it down rivers. New Orleans, at the mouth of the Mississippi River, manages the traffic that want to go from the Mississippi River to Ocean- for over 300 years!. There are some of the oldest European landmarks in North American there, and thousands of people in the region help on offshore oil rigs that keeps the U.S.A. afloat. There is a good reason there is a city there.

    But not to you, Mr. Asshole. To you, its THEIR fault this happened. Its my grandmothers fault that her house is under water right now (which is why I am so mad at your heartless comment). I mean 40 years ago she COULD have bought it somewhere else, except for the fact that my grandfather's job was in New Orleans and they didn't have the means to live else where. But no, you are right, its her fault.

    This shit makes me sooo mad. And to see such cold tripe modded up....sad day...

    1. Re:How is this modded insightful? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The fact remains that human activity can be implicated to some extent in this disaster. The hurricane is beyond anyone's control, but the fact that most of New Orleans sits below sea level is directly attributable to the short-sighted actions of human beings, and now the toll may very well be an entire city. People tend to have this notion that nature can be permanently tamed, but in a day, a century of engineering was crushed and now the very existence of large parts of one of North America's most colorful cities is in question.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  122. Geeky antennae stuff by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My old departed friend Bob Long (W6QBN) when he wasn't telling me how these newfangled digital computers work, loved to talk about his amateur radio habit. An ex USN carrier radio officer, his interests covered morse skills, happily conveyng enormous detail about why you need an IF stage (think "applications middleware" but in an analogue sense) but more than anything he loved to rattle on about the subject of antennae.

    It seems that you can get one or two watts of transmitter to go amazing distances if you know a little antennae theory and know how to lay your hands on a reel of coax cable.

    Long-wires, capacity hats, incredible things like directional-discontinuity ring radiators, very high tech that can be built with a few iron fence stakes and a bit of wire and a good head for geometry.

    Astoundingly powerful communications technology for an extremely accessible cost. If you want to know more get an old ARRL handbook. Sort of like the older Boy Scout Handbooks from back in the days when they were useful, but cover all the basics of home-brew transmitters. Get one.

    One of the problems ham radio faces in times of cataclysmic storm is the shape of the ionosphere at the time and place. It's used as a signal reflector. On good days you can whisper from Maine to Tokyo on a watt. On bad days, you can't punch through with 50MW unless you have line of sight.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Geeky antennae stuff by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of a time in school - we had some old WW2 ex-army backpack HF radios with, I think, about 5W output. We took one on an Adventure Training week in North Wales and were able to contact the school, south of London, using an inverted L antenna. That's a couple of hundred miles.

      Interestingly, the chump that calculated the antenna length made NASA's mistake - calculated in metres, cut to length in feet. Still managed to get through, which might have had something to do with having a flat granite rockface behind the antenna. Or maybe not - I'm not any kind of expert in these thing.

    2. Re:Geeky antennae stuff by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Also might have had something to do with the local water table, which I have been told has something to do with signal propagation too.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  123. The Internet is still working in NO... by Mr.Radar · · Score: 1

    http://www.wwltv.com/ (a New Orleans TV station) is webcasting live streaming video of their newsfeed, and http://www.somethingawful.com/ (a very large humor website & forum), which is hosted in downtown NO, is still operational. I guess that in this case the Internet is working as designed, and routing around damaged nodes (however I've heard the bandwidth in and out of NO is much lower than normal due to damaged/destroyed/inoperable routers, switches, cables, etc.).

    --
    What if this signature were clever?
  124. Cell phone system was a mistake. by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back in the late seventies and early eighties, Gerard K. O'Neill, famous for the development of the idea of orbital space habitats, made the rounds of the government and corporate powers to strongly propose the idea of the satellite phone. He wanted to have a profit-making reason to go into space to realize his dreams.

    The prototype phone he showed around was about the size of a cellular handset you could buy today.

    O'Neill's project never made it out of the gate. Too expensive for a private company to make, and we are all about private companies.

    Bill Gates famously put some of his cash into a six billion dollar venture called Iridium which actually still functions. At least, unless they've deorbitted due to budget woes. They went bankrupt, and the US government picked it up for pennies on the dollar. That's one way of getting a cheap satphone system.

    America and the rest of the planet went a different route, for purely business reasons. It was more profitable to roll out cellular coverage in stages, as customers could be found to pay the bills. They make fabulous amounts of money.

    But as we see today in New Orleans, although cell phones passed the money test, they've utterly failed to support their users. People are dying out there because the cheap, easy-to-build cell towers are powerless and flooded.

    Sometimes, and I can't see how much more forcefully a point can be made than an entire region falling out of communication, engineering for critical infrastructure should NOT BE LEFT SOLEY TO THE FREE MARKET.

    The military is flying in satphones so that rescuers and cops can finally talk to each other.

    Iridium, or a successor should be government subsidized, expanded, and maintained as a national security asset. Screw the cell phone companies. Screw the billionaires. Make a national phone company, like the post office. Let it operate independently, for profit, but chartered to provide service for all, from the satellites in the sky, at subidized prices. Priority for disasters. We need this. It is not an optional extra for civilization.

    I know someone who can't rest because a relative was driving north on I-10 and hasn't been heard from in over two days. He should be able to phone. A prison has rioted, and no one can get through to find out what's going on.

    If we can spend a trillion- yes, after it is over, a trillion will be spent-- on this war in Iraq, we can spend a few measly billion dollars a year in perpetuity to make sure this infrastructure failure never happpens again.

    Libertarians, this one's for you. A lesson in humility and sanity. Government is sometimes the only solution.

    1. Re:Cell phone system was a mistake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that radio communications is one of the most highly regulated aspects of the economy, I don't see how this is much of a challenge to libertarians.

      You can't have a decent transmitter without getting licensed by the government. Most licenses are expensive. The least-regulated bands with decent range are the ham radio bands, and looky that, ham radio is the fallback in emergencies when everything else fails.

      Another poster expressed frustration that the FCC puts such a tight rein on ultrawideband, because UWB does a lot better with interference from rain and so on. It also gets great range for a given amount of power. So of course they limit it to miniscule power with a range of 30 feet. That's government for ya. If it weren't for the FCC and government copyright enforcement,
      MP3 players by now would have UWB transceivers hooked into a mesh network covering the city, with microphones included for podcasts, and communications would be fine as long as the AA supply held out.

      The FCC was necessary when it started, but technology now makes all these restrictions just get in the way of progress. For more on the technical details, check out David Reed's OpenSpectrum site.

  125. Re:VoIP by metallic · · Score: 1

    A large chunk of the broadband infrastructure has been destroyed. The company I work for has been offline for two days. About the only company in our area (Northwest Louisiana) that can give us service close to equal of that to a T1 is Time Warner, but it will take 30-45 days for them to get us back online. We were supposed to be back online with Bell South on Thursday, but their data center in New Orleans got taken out this morning when another levy broke.

    Right now, the only connection I have is dialup.

    --
    Karma: Positive. Mostly effected by cowbell.
  126. Communication Solution by klept · · Score: 1

    Dont worry. NateTech and all the other 60+ year old Ham radio men will be out there doing Morse Code. The only problem is, no one will be able to understand them. Well, Nate, this is the best opportunity you cw hypers have to prove you're right and show the nefarious FCC they're wrong. 88

  127. UWB by Sepodati · · Score: 1

    UWB uses a large range of frequencies, frequencies that companies have paid a large amount of money for. UWB claims that it's such a low power that it won't interfere with these frequencies or it'll use other ones, though. If you're Sprint and you shell out a ton of cash for a freq range, you don't want other system using it (even if you're not, at the moment).

    So it's probably a big politics game right now, although I think UWB has a lot of potential.

    ---John Holmes...

  128. Quote from the Founder of New Orleans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Listen, lad. I built this city up from nothing. When I started here, all there was was swamp. Other mayors said I was daft to build a city on a swamp, but I built it all the same, just to show 'em. It sank into the swamp. So, I built a second one. That sank into the swamp. So, I built a third one. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp, but the fourth one... stayed up! And that's what you're gonna get, lad: the strongest city in the land."

  129. 800Mhz failed, hams save the day again by KB3JUV · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just recieved reports that New Oreleans trunked 800 MHz trunked system failed. Ham radio operators are pretty much standing by waiting to get into the city. People are being evacuated from the city and the last thing they would do is let hams go in. I have been listening to the Hurricane Net and am really amazed by all the work they and the SATERN guys are doing. Good luck to all of them.

    --
    www.kb3juv.com
  130. Systems not designed for everyone to use at once by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    Phone systems, for example, are designed to handle a particular load. That load is "a small percentage of all customers simultaneously." So if you have an area with 100,000 people, maybe you can handle 10,000 simultaneous phone calls in an exchange. It's generally not worth the 10x increase in cost just to be able to handle worst-case scenarios. And really, it's not like emergency services will be able to deal with even 10,000 calls at once.

  131. Cell companies cheaping out (was Ive got a friend) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I've got a friend who's evacuated out of state and has a cell phone with long distance service, but people are having problems calling TO him. Presumably because the call is still trying to get to New Orleans to figure out where to forward his phone call.


    This is a good reason that the cellular companies need to re-instate the Local Access Numbers (or Roamer Access Numbers depending who you ask)

    It's the system that was used when all the local cellular systems were independant. If you were roaming, people had to know where you were and call a phone number there. They would then enter your phone number (MIN) and your cellular phone would ring.

    I continued using the system for quite some time after roaming call delivery was implemented. It was a handy way for people from the area you were in to call you without you or them having to pay long distance fees. (After the so called follow-me roaming was implemented, I would get calls from people where I was, paying long distance to my home area, while I was paying long distance from my home area. This was before everyone had free long distance)
  132. Curious thought.. by lionchild · · Score: 1

    In the post-weather calm, when people can get back in to search for survivors and review the damage, why not deploy mobile trucks that have generators. These units could deploy tethered weather balloons that hold aloft temporary cell sites.

    Cell sites get knocked down and/or damaged in a weather event like this. Emergency Services deploys weather balloon toting trucks afterwards to provide extended cell/radio coverage, thus temporarily restoring communications for survivors.

    Or has this already been done?

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  133. New Network by rkrabath · · Score: 1

    We are still using a client-server model for communications.

    We need a new p2p based mobile voice technology. We have all these low power devices (cell phones) that can both send and recieve data, why not use this capability to devise a self healing mesh network? Are there technological hurdles to this method?

    --
    Who do I have to blackmail to get some representation around here!?!?!?!?
  134. Re:Yet another reason by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    Blizzards you say?

    A roof steeply sloped to prevent snow build-up
    an adequate supply of firewood/food/water
    no trees withing falling distance of the house.

    Anything else I need be worried about? Not to say bad things can't happen, but the vast bulk of things are able to be prepared for in advance.


    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  135. Re:Yet another reason by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    well I didn't want to be cocky and just say NY ;-) I'm originally from Rochester and to my knowledge no significant hurricane effects have ever really been felt there.

    We had a massive ice storm back in '89 I think...but with proper planning you can 'weather' that just fine.


    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  136. Store and forward over Bluetooth? by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    Why doesn't some enterprising programmer produce a store and forward email/SMS messaging system for, say, Series 60 mobiles phones using Bluetooth. A bit of public key crypto would keep the messages private. As soon as the message is on a device with a working cellular service or an Internet connection, it gets sent.

    This is just a brief thought, and I'm sure there are dozens of holes you can poke in the idea, but there must be some way to get something like this working to create an ad-hoc network with such powerful little devices.

  137. Another Idea by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    After you donate to any charity you choose why not make your next vacation to a spot hit hard by the storm?

    Take your business meeting there, family trip or day trip to a place who has had to rebuild and spend a few dollars there. The people need outside economic stimulation - for years. If you can't make up your mind on where to visit next summer, pick a town who is just starting to rebuild and show your support.

    and spare us the comments on the obvious reasons why a few obvious places aren't going to be a choice

  138. Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Other ways of rephrasing the question might be:
    1. Why can't the system not fail in an event that releases around 200 times as much energy as the human species produces electricity?
    2. Why can't the system not fail in the face of an event with an energy release roughly equivalent to a 10 megaton bomb every 10 minutes?
    And those seem to be estimates for "typical" hurricanes, so they might undershoot the power of a category 4 storm...
  139. Evacuating the Superdome and Amtrak Comments by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    First of all, the governer(s) should've declared marshall law in these areas.

    Then they could've commendered these trains BY FORCE if needed. That would've been a very simple solution to that problem.

    Here is a bad joke.
    What do you call Amtrak getting lifted off the tracks into the air by a hurricane? Valujet ;-)

    More seriously now...
    About the current situation - how are they going to evac 30,000 people from the Superdome?

    - There are no roads in.
    - You cannot get a boat much larger than '15 person' capacity in the vicinity
    - Helicopters only hold 5-7 people

    Any ideas?

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:Evacuating the Superdome and Amtrak Comments by ElectroBot · · Score: 1

      Use rafts and small private boats/yahts.

    2. Re:Evacuating the Superdome and Amtrak Comments by Deideldorfer · · Score: 0

      I thought everyone in Louisiana owned their own swamp boat!

      --

      Power off before disconnecting connecting connector. Seen on a cash register
    3. Re:Evacuating the Superdome and Amtrak Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Military and and Commercial Hovercraft would be Ideal in this situation.

  140. SCUM! by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    New Orleans is a cesspool of scum, filth, disease, and rotting corpses....then the hurricane blew in. ;-)

    (sorry, I couldn't resist..Lord I apologize, please forgive me and be with the starving pygmies down in New Guniea)

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  141. New policy perhaps? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Given that there is NOTHING our current technology can do to stop this from happening again, I would be VERY suprised if ANYONE could get insurance inside this city ever again.

    I would love to read a risk-based analysis of this situation and what the predictions of the future are.

    Also the government would not be wise to allow people to rebuild in the same areas inside the city. If the city doesn't go bankerupt after this I'll be suprised. Therefore, the most logical policy for the government would be to not authorize any new development or zoning inside the "flood bowl".

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  142. Why not use communication balloons? by Saggi · · Score: 1

    I have always wondered why no one uses balloons for communication. The concept of using zeppelins to provide high ground antenna arrays for mobile communication has already been established.

    In cases of catastrophes this could be useful. It might take to long to fly a zeppelin in there (like the tsunami in Asia) but you might fly a balloon there and send it up. It might even be tied to the ground with a mile long cable that would provide it with a range of several miles, enough to cover a large city in the case of a terror attack like 9/11 or an earth quake. The cable could also provide power from a ground based generator.

    It should provide antennas for mobile phones, simply because this is a well known technology. We should not start to invent new radios etc. but might simply equipped every rescue member with a mobile (they probably already have one). There might be an issue in regards to charging the batteries, but that might be fixed.

    At the same time, using mobile phones, would allow those trapped in the zone to communicate. You might choose to limit the communication to SMS or something similar in order to save bandwidth (unless you were a rescue worker).

    Simple and effective. I just wonder why it is not allready done...

    --
    -:) Oh no - not again.
    www.rednebula.com
    1. Re:Why not use communication balloons? by Cujo · · Score: 1

      There has been some discussion of doing this, but you need two things:

      1. A balloon at high altitude, above nearly all the clouds and with a view of a large area of the Earth.
      2. A tethered ballon that doesn't float away with the jet stream

      The problem has always been the weight of the tether. New materials are likely to make that problem go away. Then communications balloons are a great idea.

      --

      Helium balloons want to be free.

  143. Why the phones don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose when they are under water they don't work very well.

    What a stupid thread!

  144. Mod parrent as flamebait by 2bitcomputers · · Score: 1

    This is just utter ignorance on your part. I work for the only company in Canada licenced to operate residential BBPL service. I also happen to have a no-code tech. licence. I can tell you with 100% certanty that our equipment does not interfear with ham radio services. We use BBPL repeaters to provide high speed service to the utility poles and use standard 801.11b for the last mile service into homes. We had to go through hell and back to get the CRTC to licence us because of concerns about cross talk on ham bands but this issue is now a dead one as its been shown that it does not interfeer with ham and aproval has alreay been given. The proof is in the pudding, all my repeaters are showing as up and working, and your still able to use your radio. Where is this RF polution you speak of? I would like to hear about it.

    --
    -- Please insert another quarter
    1. Re:Mod parrent as flamebait by finkployd · · Score: 1

      This is just utter ignorance on your part. I work for the only company in Canada licenced to operate residential BBPL service. I also happen to have a no-code tech. licence. I can tell you with 100% certanty that our equipment does not interfear with ham radio services.

      So with credentials you must know that the BPL causes problems on the HF spectrum, not VHF and UHF which as a no code tech, you are limited to. Do you have any experience with the actual bands that are at issue? You justification for your arguement sounds rather like someone saying "I live in Pittsburgh and it is dry here, so obviously flooding is not really a problem anywhere".

      Finkployd

  145. Meanwhile... by Peregr1n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Red Cross say they are launching their "biggest-ever natural disaster effort". So... how much effort exactly did they put into the tsunami relief, where hundreds of thousands died, as opposed to a hundred or so. Oh wait, they're Americans, of course. But seriously, where was all this high tech communications equipment when communications were knocked out across most of South Asia (and barely restored now)? Mississippi isn't all that big, when you think about it.

  146. homeland security = con con 1000x over. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    So billions being spent on HLS, just in case one nutcase nukes a city... (only govt agents do those things) While $$ spent on real mobile networks that wont die in hurricanes... $0

    PRICELESS.... well the price is our lives and taxes for those morons in charge.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  147. Blimp being tested right now actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a blimp constructed to be able to increase GSM-coverage in disaster areas tested today(!) above the ESRANGE rocket launch site in northern Sweden.

    I've got a link in, but only in Swedish though ;)
    http://svt.se/svt/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=22620&a=4413 60

  148. Lurid film at 11: Physical laws being violated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! You violated the laws of physics, and prevented a system that was never designed to carry communications signals from radiating interferance into the air.

  149. SHOW US YOUR TITS, KATRINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah!

  150. problem: hurricanes do not file flight paths by johnpaul191 · · Score: 2, Informative

    that story aside, there is no absolutes when plotting the path of a hurricane. remember if you evacuate people, you have to move them somewhere... and you may be moving them right into the path of the storm. Amtrak trains would be a very slow way to do mass evacuations of a whole region.... and the trains have limited directions they can go. didn't you ever see a Godzilla movie? the people on the trains ALWAYS get it.

    there is also the case of many people not wanting to leave. in a way i could see their thinking. people did not expect this kind of devastation. people have a habit of recalling the worst storm they remember and figure "i survived that". they also fear leaving all their possessions to looters or whatever.

  151. blimps and drones by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    not just blimps but there have been those tests of drone aircraft that can relay communications (phone and internet) to the ground. the planes they are working on could stay aloft for weeks at a time, they are almost gliders and have solar panels on their wings. if i remember right one of them was called Helios and used a Mac Tibook (because of its weight).

    this seems to be a perfect case for drones or blimps. they are saying it may take a month to fully drain the city, THEN they start cleaning up THEN they start rebuilding the power, communications, water etc services. it is going to take a long time to rebuild and having some form of communication up would be a boost... even if it is a drone that can be a repeater for proprietary walkie-talkies.

    those had multiple purposes including being able to fly over an area like this and bring up some degree of cell service (or military use to fly over a battlefield kind of area possibly). while you may not think that matters, it would be a big help to rescue workers. they could also work as radio towers for walkie talkies. right now they have to use satellite phones.

    the military use has limitations, but there are a slew of ideas on how to set up a communications grid for soldiers (including them dropping little repeaters and using a network of them back to base). Wired has had stories about the ideas. i guess the thinking is that if the military likes your idea and throws you cash it is very lucrative, and you will have tons of R&D funding.... with the trickle down technology making it to the public in some form.

  152. Telephone Companies Preparedness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't speak for the cell phone companiies but I used to work for Nortel. They kept tractor trailers full of equipment ready to roll. Last disaster I heard about the telephone company that serviced the area couldn't get their regular supplier to commit to anything less than 6 weeks, we had an emergency CO up and running in three days.

    I don't know if they still do that or not but at the time it made me proud. It prbably also made the marketing department's year.

  153. Is everyone fucktarded??? by acoustix · · Score: 1
    "In this age of cheap commoditized consumer electronics and advanced mobile technology, why can't all the people of a city make contact during an emergency? Cell phone circuits filled up during 9/11 attacks and in the wake of hurricane Katrina very few victims can make contact with their families, despite the fact that they have all those mobile phones."

    Holy crap, think about what you're saying.

    - Cell phones NEED cell towers to operate. They are not walkie talkies.
    - Cell towers need equipment to process and route calls. This equipment is under 20 feet of water.
    - This equipment also needs power to run. The power cables and stations are under 20 feet of water.
    - Mobile devices also fall prey to wind. Not many poles and towers can stand sustand winds of 140+ MPH.

    The number one misunderstanding that people have about communications (mobile or land based) is that it will be available in an emergency. You would think that after 100 years of the opposite that they would learn. There is no guarantee that your cell phone will work in perfect weather, let alone in a hurricane. Have you ever tried to make a cell phone call at a sporting event with over 50,000 people in the same place? Good luck getting through.

    Even using portable cell towers won't work if the rest of the infrastructure is severely damaged.

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  154. Tactical Wireless IP Communications by f4wjoemack · · Score: 1

    My company is currently deploying a series of meshed IP networks in order to interconnect several emergency operation centers and mobile command centers in the field. This network will be used by response personel for Voice, Video and, Data. We are linking several VSAT base stations together (providing internet and local applications along the wireless network) to create VPN access points and Exported IP Video broadcasting of several areas to be made available on the web to response agencies. Here is press release: For Immediate Release F4W provides Tactical Wireless Emergency Phone and Internet services for areas devastated by Hurricane Katrina Rapid Deploy Tactical Network provides mission critical law enforcement application support and Internet connectivity to support the relief efforts of the Hillsborough County (Florida) Sheriffs' Mobile Command Center. Lake Mary, FL - August 30, 2005--F4W, a leading developer of Tactical Wireless Solutions for public safety, emergency response and Homeland Security announced the deployment of the Tactical Wireless Emergency Broadband Network (TWEB(TM)) to assist disaster relief efforts in the hardest hit areas of Mississippi. Fire, rescue and law enforcement agencies from all over the country have responded with equipment and personnel to assist the areas devastated by Hurricane Katrina. F4W will deploy a TWEB network that provides secure wireless internet and phone service to multiple Mobile Command Centers and patrol vehicles from the various responding agencies. Additionally, F4W will deploy a Wireless Emergency Broadband Video (WEBVTM) network to provide wireless surveillance video of key intersections, staging areas and food distribution centers. "The tactical nature of this technology allows us to offer services not possible with other wireless or wired networks. We are able to deploy a network that covers several miles in a matter of hours, as was demonstrated by our deployment last year after hurricane Charley" said Harry Timmons, President of F4W. F4W's TWEB VoIP networks are a rapidly deployable wireless communication system designed to provide secure phone services. TWEB's feature Motorola, Tachyon and Panasonic equipment and F4W control software and network devices to provide phone and data service at key locations, in moving patrol vehicles and even watercraft securely at high speeds. TWEB networks are much less expensive than traditional voice and Internet solutions, and can be easily reconfigured as a users needs change. Allan Edwards CEO of F4W said,"In an area of vast devastation with no traditional phone lines, cell phone or public safety radio services, the F4W TWEB network will provide critical communications for relief agencies and a lifeline from the disaster area to the outside world. F4W will do everything possible to extend these services wherever they are needed." About Freedom 4 Wireless Based in Lake Mary, Florida, F4W is a developer of proprietary 4th Generation Mobile Broadband Wireless Services applications and products. F4W's unique tactical network products for Public Safety and Vertical Industries create mobile ad hoc networks designed for specific use and function. These self-forming networks and unique collaboration software provide secure, simple to use networks that provide real-time video, VoIP, and data services to users wherever they are, whenever they need it. 2 F4W is providing Tactical Wireless Emergency Broadband(TM) solutions for Homeland Security, First Responders and Law Enforcement Agencies. TWEB provide instant broadband data communications for tactical emergency response teams who need self forming, self healing networks. The users literally become the network; F4W tactical solutions can provide instant broadband communications without the need for a fixed infrastructure. Freedom 4 Wireless' solutions revolutionize the way Homeland Security, Law Enforcement and Emergency Responders access critical information and communicate, real-time, even while traveling a high speeds. Tactical Wireless Emergency Broadband, Video Wireless E

  155. Katrina by redeyeowl · · Score: 1

    What happened in New Orleans is a tragedy and the people there do need help. But let's not forget the people of Florida who have not yet recovered from last years 4 hurricanes. They need as much help today as they did before Katrina. Don't send all the funds to New Orleans Peter Kuhn Lakeland Florida doublewidetrailer@gmail.com