Slashdot Mirror


Hard Drive Window

Xx Shinwa xX writes "This guy has done what was thought to be impossible: he has opened his hard drive and installed a clear acrylic window. And it still works. I would love to try this, if I had the guts."

380 comments

  1. Usefool by biocute · · Score: 5, Funny

    This guy deserves a usefool entry.

    One day I'll get around to making a window for my CDROM, so that I can see what's going on when there's no CD inside.

    1. Re:Usefool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "WARNING: Do not look into laser with remaining eye."

    2. Re:Usefool by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a hint: it's bright and red.

      I swear that I opened up my Liteon the other day before the laser shut off. Maybe it's class I, but you'd think that there wouldn't be a reason to have the laser on when the drive is spinning down and the door's actually in the process of opening.

    3. Re:Usefool by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny

      "One day I'll get around to making a window for my CDROM, so that I can see what's going on when there's no CD inside."

      Excellent. Maybe this same technology can be applied to a refrigerator so we can see what happens when the door is closed.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:Usefool by Sketch · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Excellent. Maybe this same technology can be applied to a refrigerator so we can see what happens when the door is closed.

      Just wait until you can see all of the bodies in the trunk of my car through the trunk window!

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    5. Re:Usefool by Tongo · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Finally I'll know whether the light turns out or not!

    6. Re:Usefool by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Excellent. Maybe this same technology can be applied to a refrigerator so we can see what happens when the door is closed.

      Elephants. Elephants marching around in the butter.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    7. Re:Usefool by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      i dismantled a discman once, the laser seemed to barely be visible on my fingertip.

      Im not sure how much of a hazard cd drives truly pose.

    8. Re:Usefool by Sketch · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Finally I'll know whether the light turns out or not!

      Just think of what this technology means for Schrodinger's Cat! We'll finally know whether or not it's alive at all times when it's inside the box!

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    9. Re:Usefool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent. Maybe this same technology can be applied to a refrigerator so we can see what happens when the door is closed.

      Elephants. Elephants marching around in the butter.


      wearing yellow shoes!

    10. Re:Usefool by cyberchondriac · · Score: 5, Funny

      The light is in a state of superposition:
      It is both on and off !

      Oh, it's a Quasar refrigerator ? I thought you said quantum !
      ;-)

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    11. Re:Usefool by ReallyNiceGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The size does not matter. Actually, a laser chip is really small. But the fact that it is infrared and tightly focused creates a hazard if you stare at it. I believe that lasers used in CD players are class IIIC, meaning safe for handling, but not for staring. At around 1mW, it is quite powerfull to actually burn your retina.

    12. Re:Usefool by halleluja · · Score: 1
      Excellent. Maybe this same technology can be applied to a refrigerator so we can see what happens when the door is closed.
      Better install a mirror to scare off unwanted nightly visitors.
    13. Re:Usefool by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Eh, so someone installs Windows on his hard disk and it's news? Why no, I didn't RTFA

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    14. Re:Usefool by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      It puts the 'brrr' back in Heisenberg.

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    15. Re:Usefool by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      i was under the impression CD readers used a red laser. I guess infrared makes more sense. Thanks for the clarification.

    16. Re:Usefool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we could figure out if schrodingers cat is dead or alive with this simple hack turninng quantum mechanics on its head.

    17. Re:Usefool by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      The reason for the warning is that an infrared ray will not be visible so your pupil will not even shrink to shield the retina. Also you won't feel anything but your retina could still end up with a hole in it. But with the CD ROM lasers you would probably be safe.

    18. Re:Usefool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah -- the surprising part is that it reportedly still works.

    19. Re:Usefool by Blind_Io_42 · · Score: 1

      It is both on and off ! This message brought to you by Schrodinger Windows Inc.

      --
      No one of consequence
    20. Re:Usefool by Cobra_666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, there ARE refrigerators with glass doors :P

    21. Re:Usefool by doxology · · Score: 2, Funny
      The size does not matter

      For Slashdotters...no it really doesn't =P

      --
      sigfault. core dumped.
    22. Re:Usefool by dodo_dodo · · Score: 1

      Ah no! I do not want to see my long-forgotten food stand up and walk around the fridge. Its pupulish color give me enough chills.

    23. Re:Usefool by PC-PHIX · · Score: 1

      Done!

      Btw, if you are into clear case mods and can see all the other moving/glowing parts of your PC, then this is a cool mod... but it's definitely not worth the risk!

      Sure, a lot of people (myself included) have run old drives with the cover off when ready to chuck them anyway or in an emergency have opened a drive, repaired it and had it survive long enough to get the data off safely.

      However, who would really want to do this to a new drive / void the warranty / shorten the drive's life expectancy, blah, blah, blah... ?

      Instead, I wonder when major hard disk manufacturers will start releasing drives with a clear top cover option? It didn't take long when it came to case modding for clear panels (and fish tanks) to start appearing from the factory...

      --
      Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
    24. Re:Usefool by catmistake · · Score: 1

      The trunk? Oh... you don't want to look in there.

    25. Re:Usefool by ryusen · · Score: 1

      depends on who you ask... i remember a girl i know once exclaiming in a coffee shop, "I'm sorry, i don't care what anybody else says... size does matter!"

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    26. Re:Usefool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will never say the word
      "Procrastinate" again; I'll never
      See myself in the mirror with my eyes closed

      - They Might Be Giants, "Dead"

      YES! EYELID WINDOWS!

    27. Re:Usefool by renrutal · · Score: 0

      Now put a glass window in the box so we can finally find out Schrodinger's Cat is dead or not.

    28. Re:Usefool by bariumLanthanide · · Score: 1
      Instead, I wonder when major hard disk manufacturers will start releasing drives with a clear top cover option?

      I'd guess that HD manufacturers haven't produced any window-modded drives yet because:
      1. There aren't any easy ways (yet) to show off your modded drive aside from leaving it sit outside the case hanging by cables, and
      2. even if people wanted to leave them dangling outside of their case or make their own enclosures for them - the drives would be more likely to fail due to their likelihood of being knocked around, etc. thus increasing returns/RMAs

      It would be cool though to see a 'gaming-' or 'extreme-' series of drives from a manufacturer, containing windows on the top and black-light reactive drive arms/heads; assuming that someone comes up with a practical way of displaying the drives outside of the case.
    29. Re:Usefool by PC-PHIX · · Score: 1
      There aren't any easy ways (yet) to show off your modded drive aside from leaving it sit outside the case hanging by cables... It would be cool though to see..... a series of drives..... containing windows..... assuming that someone comes up with a practical way of displaying the drives outside of the case
      How about a completely transparent acrylic case? Such as this one?

      I assure you, they exist, look half-way decent, if you're into that kind of thing, and some of the most boring components on display are the floppy drive and... the non-windowed hard drive!!

      --
      Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
    30. Re:Usefool by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Sure, a lot of people (myself included) have run old drives with the cover off when ready to chuck them anyway or in an emergency have opened a drive, repaired it and had it survive long enough to get the data off safely.

      Many years ago I did this with a Brand Technologies 200MB IDE drive which had growing defects. Once I opened it, it still worked as baddly as before, but SECONDS later the whole drive was full of defects. No sector would return data. I used to work in a military clean room and not even there would I open a HDD which was working fine. The distance between the heads and the platters when moving are WAY to small for even the clean room I worked in.

      This is not to say that there are not clean rooms good enough, but certainly nobodys home or office type workplace is good enough. Cigarette SMOKE particles will damage a drive. Seriously small.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    31. Re:Usefool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, laser beam width is usualy much smaller then diameter of shrinked pupil.

    32. Re:Usefool by arootbeer · · Score: 1

      Or how about the front of a dryer, so we can finally see what the King of Underwear Gnomes looks like? I want my socks back...

    33. Re:Usefool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did she then throw her chai on you and storm out of the building?

    34. Re:Usefool by PC-PHIX · · Score: 1
      This is not to say that there are not clean rooms good enough, but certainly nobodys home or office type workplace is good enough.
      That may be your experience, and I certainly wasn't recommending that people try it or saying that a drive should be expected to survive, I simply said that I have done it and successfully read back the data on the drive and I can imagine that others have got away with it too (and I have heard from some who have).

      Your statement that "certainly nobodys home or office type workplace is good enough" is a little bit presumptious. That may have been your experience, but that doesn't mean it is true 100% of the time. Under some circumstances, some drives do survive for some amount of time. Certainly it depends on the drive and a lot of luck, but it can be done.

      You could show over and over again by killing drives this way that "many homes or office type workplaces aren't good enough", but it only takes one successful, non-clean-room operation where the drive survives to disprove the theory that "nobody's home or workplace is good enough" and I have done so on more than one occasion.

      I'll say again though, it isn't a good idea and you should only work on hard drives in a clean room environment, therefore DIY window-mods for hard drives in general are going to be a bad idea. That still doesn't mean it's not possible, just a very bad idea!!

      --
      Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
  2. Not the FIRST time... by MikeSty · · Score: 0

    ... but still a fun mod. I'd like to see one that's clear on ALL sides.

    1. Re:Not the FIRST time... by grub · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I did something on the top side about 5ish years ago, seethis pic of what I called "cleardisk"

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Not the FIRST time... by luvirini · · Score: 1

      And really... used to open drives to unjam writeheads and such.. so nothing really strange about that, but drives are really getting more and more finicky, thus the part about the drive being old.. new drives wold have a WAY low probability of success.

    3. Re:Not the FIRST time... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Parent is not a troll unless you'r the kind of moron who likes to go browsing in people's web dirs... Mods please fix.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  3. Yippy-Skippy. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was impressed with this, until I read the following:
    This is the unmodified hard drive, a Western Digital 3 GB drive (Caviar 33100) made in 1997.
    I hate to be a buzzkill, but BFD. I regularly disassembled these drives for data recovery purposes back in the salad days, when I was a carefree computer repair technician. We had an excellent level of success with any drive smaller than 4 GB, and one 2 GB drive, on which I replaced the head assembly for data recovery purposes, happily ran for over two years after the surgery.

    I thought this mod was going to be performed on a contemporary drive, which would have been duly impressive. Heck...perform this mod successfully on a drive as big as 30 GB, and I'll tip my hat. But 3 GB? Sorry, but no.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by imboboage0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just for reference, I am 15 years old. Over the summer, I was bored. So I took a WD 10 gig and did this. works great to this day.

      In an odd coincidence, My friend just asked me yesterday to mod his 7200RPM 80 gig barracuda. This drive is BRAND NEW (still in the static wrap) sitting right next to me as I type this. Personally, I think the hardest part of this whole mod was gluing (Did I spell that right? lol.) the plexi back onto the drive cover. If you have a little spare time and wanna do something crazy with those drives, try this. It was rather fun.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    2. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by GatorMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Newer drives with increased capacity won't make this mod any more difficult. They still use the same physical size platters, same physical size casing, still has a spindle, motor, read/write assembly, and circuit board on back. If anything, just the abnormal case design on that series of WD Caviar is more difficult because of how the top cover extends down around the sides of the drive casing.

    3. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by atta1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate to burst that bubble, but newer drives have a few major differences that make this mod more hazardous. Specifically, aerial density (more tpi), smaller head size and a lower fly height. All these things make particulates in the drive much more hazardous to the drive and will cause it to fail sooner.

      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote" -- Kosh
    4. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my college hardware labs is a 4GB drive with a clear plastic window, which also works perfectly. Beat that.

      (Of course now this thread's in motion, what's the chances of drive manufacturers getting in on the act?)

    5. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by grolschie · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The hardest part is making sure that not a spec of dust gets in there.

    6. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by IAmTheDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently it did. Picture links are dead.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    7. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to be a buzzkill

      Maybe, but you still killed our buzz. I think you need to smoke us out to make up for it.

    8. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      " This drive is BRAND NEW (still in the static wrap) sitting right next to me as I type this. Personally, I think the hardest part of this whole mod was gluing (Did I spell that right? lol.) the plexi back onto the drive cover."

      For you maybe, but I suspect the hardest part for most anyone else would be finding a friend stupid enough to ruin a brand new hard drive.

    9. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      And of course you and I posted the same thing at roughly the same time. :) Oh, well.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    10. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I can't help but thinking...

      - 12 Steel Rods
      - Transparent Plastic Tarp
      - Rubber Kitchen Gloves
      - Lots'o'Duct Tape (Or strong packing tape if you want to keep things visible from all angles)
      - Vacuum cleaner with hose

      Step 1: Take the steel rods and weld them into a cube shape.
      Step 2: Tape pieces of plastic tarp to each side of the cube. Add tape to the edges to ensure that it's air tight.
      Step 3: Cut small, circular holes in the sides of the cube, and one small circular hole in the front.
      Step 4: Tape the kitchen gloves to the side holes. Take the vacuum hose to the front hole. Make sure these are air tight and can withstand pressure.
      Step 5: Turn on vacuum cleaner.

      Voila! Your very own clean room, with operating gloves and everything! Just make sure you put the parts and tools you want to work with inside the cube before you finish it. The hole for the vacuum cleaner would be a good place to consistently tape, untape, and retape. :-)

    11. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suspect the hardest part for most anyone else would be finding a friend stupid enough to ruin a brand new hard drive.

      Nah. They run in packs.....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    12. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just find a friend at a hospital pharmacy and borrow the clean room - 797 compliance is kicking pharmacy butt, but the upside is there's a lot of clean rooms going to be constructed, so if you need to crack open a camera lens or a hard drive...

    13. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      umm a cleanroom is not a vacum your system would either break or just give you slightly lower pressure inside nothing usefull!

      a cleanbox with a vacum cleaner and an intake filter might work though.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      Your design leaves nowhere for air to enter, so not all air will be removed. Plus, as the device struggles to achieve 0psi, the 14psi pushing in on it will be a major problem to contend with. Good luck keeping that plastic tarp in place and sturdy.

      The simple fix would be to stitch a hepa filter somewhere in the tarp, preferably where it can be attached to 2 crossbeams, because there will still be pressure on it.

      Otherwise, good idea.

    15. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      umm a cleanroom is not a vacum your system would either break or just give you slightly lower pressure inside nothing usefull!

      Sure it would. Most of the floating dust would be carried out with the air, and the rest would have no air to float around in. (Which isn't to say that you couldn't still get dust in the drive, but the danger isn't as high.)

      a cleanbox with a vacum cleaner and an intake filter might work though.

      That's an even better idea. A good HEPA filter would remove just about everything that could possibly hurt the harddrive, plus you'd have a constant flow of air that would sweep any remaining particles out of the box.

    16. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00t ? i'm 15 too and my friend wouldn't even let me dismantle his broken cdrom drive... and my dad won't let go any of his hardware...
      but then, europeans are boring...

    17. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the rest would have no air to float around in"

      You aren't creating a vacuum. Vacuum cleaners are not that strong. This isn't a bell jar we're talking about here.

      "you'd have a constant flow of air that would sweep any remaining particles out of the box."

      Dust is sticky, it tends to cling to surfaces. Look at the blades of a fan, they get get pretty filthy. Even surfaces directly in front of a fan get dusty and are a constant source of particles. Unless you purged all of the surfaces in your box also, even one microscopic particle could kill the drive.

    18. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by petermgreen · · Score: 1


      Sure it would. Most of the floating dust would be carried out with the air, and the rest would have no air to float around in. (Which isn't to say that you couldn't still get dust in the drive, but the danger isn't as high.)

      it would if you could achive vacum but i don't thing your design would be strong enough to do that. and even if the box was solid and well sealed i don't think you'd get gloves that would handle atnospheric persure on the outside and vacum on the inside without resorting to hard materials and complex mechanical joints.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    19. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by seweso · · Score: 0

      Would that really be so special? If that is the case, then this story is special also:

      I dropped a 120 Gigabyte (IBM/Hitachi) drive on a very hard wooden floor and it didn't survive the crash. Just for fun I opened it and saw that the head wasn't in the resting position and put it back. When I tried the disk once more it worked again...

    20. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Chaoticmass · · Score: 1

      Once while working in a service department at a computer store I had a dead 10 gig laptop drive. It was the kind of dead laptop drive that sounded like it was alternating between playing atari music and doing a car alarm sound. I took it apart to see if I could figure out how it was possible for it to make musical sounds. The platters were not spinning. I bumped middle of the platter motor with my finger and it started spinning, and the music stopped. I put the drive back together, formatted it, and used it in a test bench computer for a year before it started flaking out.

      Amazed me that such delicate and precise equipment could be dicked around so much and still work at all.

    21. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by BTM1001 · · Score: 1

      Turn the switch from SUCK to BLOW. You want positive pressure inside the cleanroom. That way no random things can get in. This is assuming that you can filter the air coming in from the blower in some effective (HEPAish) way. Note that if you are working with an aerosolized biological agent then you do want the chamber to have negative pressure (vacuum on suck), that way no bugs will escape as you put the white powder in the envelope. Just make sure that the suction area has some kind of disinfectant method. Still no guarantees on longevity of the drive though, there are a lot of factors such as outgassing from the window material interfering with the heads, the nifty pressure/humidity vent/regulator that is normally in the lid, vibration differences.......

    22. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      I think you'd have better luck blowing filtered air into the chamber. You leave the chamber not perfectly air tight, so you stay at about 1atm, but the air inside the chamber will be free of dust, and dust attempting to enter will be blown back out.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    23. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by birge · · Score: 1

      I think you got it backwards! You want the exaust of the vacuum (if you have access to it) to be directed in the room. The cleanroom needs to be at high pressure, not low, so that shit stays out. But I like your idea. Just add a HEPA filter to the exaust of a shopvac and you're in business.

    24. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by alienw · · Score: 1

      You don't need vaccuum. You just need to not have any dust. A vaccuum cleaner + filter combination would probably be ideal, assuming the box is airtight and doesn't shed particles.

    25. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      agreed i was responding to the first part of the parent post not the second as my quoting clearly indicated.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    26. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by esobofh · · Score: 1

      Neither of this options will do anything for you - adding a vaccum or filters is not going to help. If you truly want to clean-room a small box at home your best bet is to make said small plastic cube, firmly sealed, with an exhaust port on the top that is sealable (small flap over a hole you can tape) and an intake on the bottom.

      Put your hard drive in the box first, seal the box up. Through the small hole in the bottom, insert the straw of a computer/electronics type "compressed air" product and spray it in. The "air" inside these products is a heavier-than-air combination of nitrogen, aerosol and some other goodies. This will effectively 'push-out' the air and it's suspended dust and particles. Once you feel you've sprayed enough to fill the box seal up both holes and proceed with the work.

      --

      ----------------------------
      Esobofh - Currently drinking fresh mango juice.
    27. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that if you are working with an aerosolized biological agent

      Could somebody please mod this guy +1 CREEPY !!?!

    28. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by kimvette · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The coil driving the heads is called a voice coil for a reason; it is very similar to the windings of a loudspeaker. If the heads jam then the resulting vibration against whatever obstruction exists can resonate the platters or the drive case itself, amplifying the sound.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    29. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

      I don't need no stinkin' clean room. Back in the old days I had an Amiga with one of those Seagate drives with the "stiction" problem that would refuse to spin up.

      A rap on the side with a screwdriver got it going for a few months then even that wouldn't work. Then I popped the cover off and would get it started with a flick of a finger along the edge of the platter. I set the cover back on and set something heavy on it to hold it in place. Worked fine until I shut it off then I had to spin it up again. It worked like that for several more months until I got bored and tried to lube the spindle with drop of WD-40. It didn't like that at all and started getting read errors all over the place. Oh well.

      Disclaimer: I did close my office window and put out my cigarette when the drive was open.

    30. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Even a speck of dust isn't really a huge problem assuming it doesn't get between the head and the platter - all modern HDs have a small air filter inside them that will catch tiny bits of grime and oxide and prevent them from blowing around inside the casing.

      So long as you're relatively careful, it shouldn't be a major problem.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    31. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by nekura · · Score: 1

      We did this with a 40 GB hard drive back in high school for a project. In fact, if there was anything we could add a window to, we did it.

      --

      "Programming is like sex - one mistake and you'll have to support it for the rest of your life."
    32. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "i don't think you'd get gloves that would handle atnospheric persure on the outside and vacum on the inside without resorting to hard materials and complex mechanical joints."

      A pair of metal gloves from a suit of armor, with plastic gloves on the inside and outside should work.

    33. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by mnmn · · Score: 1

      I used to have a 5.25" 8GB Quantum HDD.... with a CLEAR PLASTIC WINDOW on it. You could see the head initialize, and see it park. You could see if its working in the Linux partition or the Windows partition. With some programming you could make it dance.

      Heck I put Linux on a USB key last weekend. Maybe if I put it up as news, the moderators will post it. "Linux on USB Keys finally!!".

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    34. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      I once disasembled a 100MB drive I had lying around. NO amount of dust would make it headcrash. I was so disappointed.

    35. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to my 40GB notebook drive. It decides to die one day and crashed the OS. But no, it was not completely dead, I was able to boot it one last time, until in subsequent reboots it stop sooner and sooner until it won't spin up at all. I tried swapping an identical controller card but didn't help. In desperation to retrieve personal financial data (last backup was a month ago), I resolved to open up the drive. Turns out to be a stuck spindle. It was REALLY stuck too. Had to exert some force with the torx wrench to get it loose. But after that it runs fine and I was able to backup all my data. This was done in my office, which was pretty dust-free. I made the mistake of unscrewing the actuator arm, and it made quite a racket as it thrashed back and forth across the platter. But I screwed it back, put the cover back on, and it seemed to work fine. Still, I don't trust that drive anymore. I now designate it for mailing pr0n to friends.

    36. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Knightlymuse · · Score: 0

      I agree, despite what you have been told Hard Drives are surprisingly resilient. Once, for the fun of it I took the cover off an unused 18 GB Seagate drive. At the time I figured it would run for a few minutes before a spec of dust hit the platter and crashed. I turned on the computer everything worked great. I let it run overnight and it was still working in the morning. It was pretty boring watching the drive do nothing so I set it up so that three very large QuickTime movies were playing all at the same time. The drive heads were constantly ripping back and forth across the surface. I let this run for three days and it continued to work without any problems. I was determined to cause the drive to fail so I sprinkled some dust on the drive platter. Again, it kept running with no errors. I also tried dirt, water, a small drop of cola but the movies kept playing faithfully. As a last resort I took a screwdriver and started running the tip back and forth across the top platter making cool looking circular patterns in it and it finally failed. (Big surprise there.) I have no doubt that if a spec of dust hits the wrong spot at the wrong time your hard drive could fail however I think the myth is a bit over rated. I would be interested to hear others experiences with this kind of experiment.

    37. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      I read a hard drive mod like this probably over a year ago... His preferred method was to use the bathroom...

      err, use A bathroom. Close the door (dont turn the fan on), turn on the shower with hot water and let the room steam up. turn off the shower and let the steam dissipate. Supposably the steam will form little droplets and pull any dust out of the air.

      I guess your plastic box and a kettle/steam cleaner would do the trick also...

    38. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Shanep · · Score: 1

      It worked like that for several more months until I got bored and tried to lube the spindle with drop of WD-40.

      Stiction in HDD's was usually between the heads and platters, not the spindle.

      Putting WD40 on the spindle may have allowed some to flick out over the platters thanks to centrifugal force, when the heads hit this much denser than air liquid. BANG! Buggered heads and possibly some platter surface area.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    39. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I now designate it for mailing pr0n to friends.

      Who mails (I assume you mean snail mail) pr0n to friends? Why not just email them links, etc? What kind of pr0n is this anyway?

    40. Re:Yippy-Skippy. by GatorMan · · Score: 1

      Assuming you do the mod properly, there's no reason to leave dust particles behind in the case. So if we rule that out there's really no reason why capacity would affect difficulty. I replace head assemblies, solder PCBs, and work with drive firmware for a living. Dust and other particulates are always a big concern, and there are methods we use to keep the risk as low as possible. And it doesn't require working inside an air-tight bubble - though we do have that option for certain situations and it can come in handy.

  4. People have done this for years!! by karlandtanya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is news??

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    1. Re:People have done this for years!! by Janitha · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have to agree, this has been done over and over and over again. I saw a windowed hard disk in TXGF Austin 2004 and many tutorials online (just google now)

    2. Re:People have done this for years!! by tgd · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, its not news, its one of four Slashdot front page stories copied from Digg.

      And like the last one (which I pointed out and got moderated as a troll), it wasn't one of the good ones.

      There are definitely better ones that could've gotten onto here for the sake of those who don't read both sites, there's some great scuba photography linked on there and a very funny 720p vs 1080i thing.

    3. Re:People have done this for years!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW I can't beleive slashdot doesn't remeber the segment Yoshi did on The Screensavers, before it was run into the group. He put a window in a harddive like 3 years ago. Very ashamed of you all for not remebering =(

    4. Re:People have done this for years!! by doorbot.com · · Score: 1
      People have done this for years!!


      Actually the mod by Linear (TFA) was done years ago. There isn't a date on the article as far as I can tell, so I can see how someone might assume that if it's new to them, it's new to everyone.
    5. Re:People have done this for years!! by dbialac · · Score: 1

      Not really. Hell, I did it 8 years ago back in college for a computer science day demonstration. Air cans come in very handy for this.

    6. Re:People have done this for years!! by MjrWoody · · Score: 1

      Hell no, wasn't news on Digg either. People have been doing this mod for years.

    7. Re:People have done this for years!! by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      Nobody asked for it, but here's my opinion:

      Slashdot submissions are hand selected - Digg's are accumulated. It's not a "lifted" story. I'm sorry to say, but there isn't an infinite supply of interesting new tech stories. Digg gets there first. It's desigend to do that.

    8. Re:People have done this for years!! by FPhlyer · · Score: 1

      Actually, when a story is submitted to slashdot, the editors can select a specific day and time for the story to be released where as digg releases them as they are submitted. The same story could be submitted at the same time on a Friday afternoon to both digg and slashdot. The story will appear on digg almost immediately, whereas the editor on slashdot may schedule the story to run the next Sunday morning to give the appearance that the slashdot editor is working 'round the clock when he is actually taking the weekend off.

      I expect that as digg continues to publish stories 8 to 12 hours before they appear on slashdot, the slashdot editors will begin revaluating their methods of releasing stories. Elsewise, slashdot will find itself becoming increasingly irrelevant.

      --
      Brought to you by Frobozz Magic Penguin Fodder.
    9. Re:People have done this for years!! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      No, its not news, its one of four Slashdot front page stories copied from Digg.

      *sigh*

      Just because a story was linked to from both Slashdot and Digg (or kuro5hin, or Fark, or WHEREVER) does not mean that one site "copied" from the other. No wonder you're getting Troll moderations.

    10. Re:People have done this for years!! by Crizp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Elsewise, slashdot will find itself becoming increasingly irrelevant
      However, the "discussion" on digg sucks. On Slashdot, you always get some good comments with replies. Digg doesn't even _have_ a "reply to this" function.
    11. Re:People have done this for years!! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Calling analogies lazy and imprecise is like french kissing your sister; it might feel good to you, but the rest of us know better.

    12. Re:People have done this for years!! by anethema · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant if you come here for the latest breaking news in tech, which I doubt 99% of the people do. They come here to discuss tech and hear from the funny, insightful, and informative among slashdots masses.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    13. Re:People have done this for years!! by chamblah · · Score: 1
      Thing is, I like both sites.

      Digg is great for seeing cool links while /. is great for reading the commentary on the linked information.

      I could care less if either site copies each other.

  5. H/D Window by greyrax · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hmm, I seem to remember someone doing that a couple of years ago.

    1. Re:H/D Window by ShrikeDOA · · Score: 2, Funny

      I definitely remember the same. Article with lots of pictures.

      --

      You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.
    2. Re:H/D Window by Temkin · · Score: 1


      I seem to remember hard drives that came with factory windows. CDC's, and IBM's mostly.... Dam... I'm getting old.

      Anyhow... I saw a FH 5 1/4" drive with a plexiglass cover back in the mid-1980's. Doing this is old news. I was thinking about building a "visable" webserver out of an old Sun IPC back 1996. I was going to silicone the whole thing to the window in my office door, and then rig it up to the net.

    3. Re:H/D Window by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      The IBM 3480 and 3490 HDAs had small windows over the RW heads. They were pretty cool to watch if you could take the noise in the cabinet.

      We had a head crash on a 3480 once. At first we thought the noise was from some construction outside. Then we get nasty red messages on the console, CICS crashes (of course it wasn't a work pack) and all that related hoo ha.
      After the CE got it out he opened it up for us. The head had dug into the platter at full speed and gouged out a spiral of aluminum out of the platter. It was a pain to recover from but it did look cool.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  6. uh huh by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Funny

    And it still works

    For now...

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:uh huh by SandSpider · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. The problem is not getting it to work at all. The problem is not seriously shortening the life span of the hard drive by opening it up in an unclean environment.

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    2. Re:uh huh by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      Seriously. what are the odds that he managed to do this without getting any dust in there? Eventually things are going to collide in a very bad way.

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    3. Re:uh huh by legirons · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The problem is not seriously shortening the life span of the hard drive by opening it up in an unclean environment."

      That doesn't even begin to describe my house...

  7. this is news? by davez0r · · Score: 4, Informative

    i thought this had been done before...and indeed it has

    http://www.overclockers.com/tips821/

    from 2002

    and that was just the first result on google for "hard drive window"

    1. Re:this is news? by Otter · · Score: 1

      I like his innovation of using a bathroom as a cleanroom. Maybe it could be combined with the RSS toilet from three stories ago? Look out, Intel!

    2. Re:this is news? by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Even as far back as 2002, the only place I have heard mentioned to do this in, is in the bathroom.

    3. Re:this is news? by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      I like the innovation of slashdot running this story again.

      I read the exact same story on slashdot years ago. And that time the links actually worked.

    4. Re:this is news? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Jeez, used to see these on trade show stands in the 80's. No Digg..oh wait!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    5. Re:this is news? by lordvdr · · Score: 1

      This will sound stupid but I'll say it anyway.
      1. Author of parent story was my old roommate.
      2. That's my dremel and tools.
      3. That's the table I took with me when I left the rental house.
      4. He copied my half-assed attempt and did a good job (so subtract 2 weeks to the posting date of that one). To quote: "Finally, I would also like to say thanks to my roommates Mark and Ben, because with them they made this mod a whole lot easier. Originally this was Mark's idea, and he got some ideas from someplace online that isn't there anymore [NOTE: BP6.com did this awhile ago], so I would like to give credit to my roommate and whoever has done this before. If you have any other questions, feel free to Email me."

      There, I feel special.
      -lv

      --
      If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor - Albert Einstein
  8. Video by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    A long time ago, a friend of mine and I took the lid off the top of a 10g full-height MFM hard disk. We used some disk-testing software to get the heads to flip back and forth in some sort of testing pattern. While it was doing this, we managed to pour lighter-fluid into the unit, and set it on fire. I still have the video somewhere, I should dig it up -- I recorded it using a parallel-port B/W Quickcam. Ah, good times, good times.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Video by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      "10g full-height MFM hard disk."

      10g?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Video by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2, Funny

      While it was doing this, we managed to pour lighter-fluid into the unit, and set it on fire.

      And after a good slashdotting, he'll get the same effect sans lighter fluid.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    3. Re:Video by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, it's been a while! I did mean to say m, not g, as in megabyte. Here's the vid. It is in a format of which I have no idea: http://www.zhrodague.net/~drew/images/fire2.avi

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    4. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ mplayer fire2.avi
      MPlayer dev-CVS--4.0.3 (C) 2000-2005 MPlayer Team

      Playing fire2.avi.

      AVI file format detected.
      AVI_NI: No audio stream found -> no sound.
      AVI: No audio stream found -> no sound.
      VIDEO: [M263] 128x96 24bpp 20.000 fps 134.6 kbps (16.4 kbyte/s)

      Exiting... (End of file)

      ~$ vlc fire2.avi
      VLC media player 0.8.4 Janus
      [00000271] main decoder error: no suitable decoder module for fourcc `M263'.
      VLC probably does not support this sound or video format.
      [00000261] main playlist: nothing to play
      [00000261] main playlist: stopping playback

      ~$ rm fire2.avi

      Thanks for trying.

    5. Re:Video by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Search for a utility called -- no joke -- "gspot" (for windows). It will tell you the codecs required for most .avi files.

    6. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you record it onto the hard drive you were burning???

    7. Re:Video by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i downloaded it but it doesn't seem to play in either windows media player or vlc

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To play this video with mplayer, use:
      $ mplayer fire2.avi -vc +ffh263

      Make sure you have an up-to-date version of mplayer (preferably a build of recent CVS).

      I'm going to submit a patch to make autodetection work.

    9. Re:Video by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      The software you refer to is available from here.

      This should prevent lots of people from making the same mistake as me, and clicking the wrong site in their google search for "gspot" while at work :|. It's a mine-field out there!

    10. Re:Video by flatface · · Score: 2, Informative
      WOW, that's bad video quality. Yes, I know it's old. Takes a bit of a hack to get it working, though:

      For mplayer, edit codecs.conf. On my system (Ubuntu), it's in /etc/mplayer/. Search for ffh263 and add the following line:

      format 0x3336324D

      HTH

    11. Re:Video by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      " '10g full-height MFM hard disk.'
      10g?"


      Yes, you haven't heard of this new spec for hard drives?

      It means that at 10 Gs of force, it's still full height... that is, it's got stable sidewalls that don't compress -- I know I'm not full height at 10 Gs, are you?

      And don't ask about the MFM, though I think Googling it would be useful, though perhaps not as useful as "MMF."*

      * Don't try either of these at work.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's h263 encoded, anything will read it. Just edit the file, and replace the string vidsm263 with vidsh263.

    13. Re:Video by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Dude, you rock! Thanks for the tips, I haven't seen this video play, prolly since I made it!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    14. Re:Video by Replicant7 · · Score: 1

      MPlayer CVS from 5 minutes ago now plays the video :)

    15. Re:Video by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Rock-on. The file actually may be munged, though, so I wouldn't put any faith in the type of format that it is in. That file has survived so many crashes, disk failures, mediums, and operating systems. I keep meaning to transcode it...

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  9. OMG by mrtroy · · Score: 1

    This is amazing!!!

    Oh wait, it gets dust/grime into your hard drive, reducing the life span drastically

    And this was first done in 1995?

    Did he put a plexiglass window in the side of his case with a neon light too?!?!?!?!

    --
    [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  10. It would be better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    If it was a glass window

  11. Cool... but by swilde23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where's the blue LEDs???

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    1. Re:Cool... but by danieljpost · · Score: 5, Funny

      Blue LED's hadn't been invented yet when this story was news.

      --
      We must drive a sword through any hypothesis that is not strictly necessary.
  12. This is news? by DaHat · · Score: 4, Informative

    People have been doing it for years, just do a Google search for "hard drive window" or better yet an images search for the same string.

  13. This is only the first step by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Funny

    Next comes painting a swirl pattern on the platter with magnetic ink so it looks pretty when it spins.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:This is only the first step by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 1

      Haha...um...I actually did that once. The drive spins too fast of course for it to look cool. Doh.

      (not on a working hard drive...but as part of my "hard drive freak show"...I had a bunch of garbage drives with no covers hooked up to a power supply and a toggle switch, so that people could come in to my office and hit the button to watch the drives spin up. Unfortunately, I was the only person who thought it was neat.)

    2. Re:This is only the first step by hurfy · · Score: 1

      hehe, i took the cover off our mini computer drive once to watch it run. Quite incredible to watch in action, the magnetic head is the size of my fist bouncing back and forth!

      Dust smust, that thing would take pebbles on the disk to bring it down.

    3. Re:This is only the first step by OlsonSchmolson · · Score: 1

      That looks kinda cool, but better once you glue your 2" mirror ball to the spindle.

  14. Vacuum? by RedACE7500 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought the inside of a hard drive was a vacuum.. am I wrong?

    1. Re:Vacuum? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      IIRC hard drives won't work in a vacuum since the read heads 'float' on the air. Any that I've seen have a ventilation hole somewhere in the case anyway, usually with a 'Do not cover' sticker by it.

    2. Re:Vacuum? by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      It isn't a vacuum, it's just nearly dust free.

    3. Re:Vacuum? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, you are wrong.

      The inside of a hard drive is at atmospheric pressure, but must be kept extremely clean. The tiniest particle of dusr/smoke/whatever can cause a head crash.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    4. Re:Vacuum? by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

      You mis-understood: They meant that Brand-X really sucks.

      (No, I don't want to be sued out of my last $.02)

    5. Re:Vacuum? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      They have air in them. It is just free of dust. Dust really big compared to air particles. Putting a harddrive in a vacuume would make it a lot more expensive, Because they will need to be reinforced to take the pressure of the earths atmosphere, difficult for humans to view and perhaps manuplate the process in a vacuume. It will add time where the drive batches will be in a room and wait for all the air to evacuate. It is much easier and cheaper to keep it dust free then build a minitature vaccume. Plus there is a safety aspect where a person punctures the drive and cause it to implode.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Vacuum? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      yes. somewhere on the drivecase, there's a teeny-tiny little hole for the purpose of allowing interior pressure to stay equal to the outside atmospheric pressure. (Look for a label saying 'do not cover this hole' or something to that extent. most older drives have one)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    7. Re:Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. In fact it's aerodynamics that keeps the head above the platter.

    8. Re:Vacuum? by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought the inside of a hard drive was a vacuum.. am I wrong?

      Only if it is by a brand that really sucks.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    9. Re:Vacuum? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny
      I thought the inside of a hard drive was a vacuum.. am I wrong?

      Inside your hard drive, no one can hear you scream. (Um, how'd you get inside your hard drive?)

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    10. Re:Vacuum? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Very punny.

    11. Re:Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAS nearly dust free.

    12. Re:Vacuum? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      actually amcdiarmid beat me to the pun a few minutes earlier, hats off to him...I wonder if he is related to the Emperor (Ian McDiarmid?)

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    13. Re:Vacuum? by scherbi · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are wrong. Open up an old one sometime an see what's inside. There's usually a channel off to the side where the air that's whirling around get's to go through a filter to weed out nasty things that might have been left behind during manufacture.

    14. Re:Vacuum? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      And the hidden vent hole is actually connected to the drive interior space through a HEPA filter of some type.

      Most drives have an additional HEPA filter inside, which traps any particles that might be shed internally, to prevent them from crashing the heads.

      An old hard drive is a pretty fascinating device to disassemble. Lots of precision manufacturing to ogle, and a pair of NdFeB magnets to play around with when you're done...:)

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    15. Re:Vacuum? by ReallyNiceGuy · · Score: 1

      A hard drive will not work on low pressure, because it uses the air and the spinning disk to create a cushion below the head. The head should never touch the plate.

      At low pressure (a montain high enough) the cushion will not be strong enough and the plate and head are destroyed when they touch. AFAIK.

    16. Re:Vacuum? by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      I thought the inside of a hard drive was a vacuum.. am I wrong?
      Yes. In fact, there is a hole to let the pressure equalize, since otherwise the case distorts enough to affect the drive.

      Also, the heads require air to fly.

    17. Re:Vacuum? by vettemph · · Score: 1

      >>> I thought the inside of a hard drive was a vacuum..
      only if you're running windows (it sucks)

        am I wrong?
      only if you're running windows :)

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    18. Re:Vacuum? by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1
      Only if it is by a brand that really sucks
      Conner (sp?), now Seagate I believe, made some drives that were pressurized and sealed... Does that mean they blew?
      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    19. Re:Vacuum? by k31bang · · Score: 1

      (Um, how'd you get inside your hard drive?)

      I've been inside his hard drive, and i've got to say his pr0n collection sucks.

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    20. Re:Vacuum? by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Most the hard drives I see say that you only void the warrenty on them if they're impacted at 700-900Gs. If CRT glass can maintain a vacuum, and the release of that vacuum, I think an aluminium shell that you could fire from a rail gun without voiding the warrenty would do ok.

  15. Looks like someone wiped his drive by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    cos when I go to the page its blank

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  16. Slashdotted by daddyrief · · Score: 0

    Slashdotted after 10 posts. Ouch.

    --
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Slashdotted by joeytmann · · Score: 1

      Must have been using the drive for the webserver and the slashdot effect caused the acrylic to melt.

      --
      Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
  17. Defraggle your motherdisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy does even better in his classic article describing how to Defraggle your motherdisc!.

  18. Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wouldn't do it in a dusty basement but if you are in a relatively clean area, and don't leave the drive out facing the elements (The guy who did it put his drive in a zip lock bag.) A clean room would be preferred but just a "clean" room with little dust should work for most cases. Companies that do this a lot (Opening Harddrives/creating harddrives) will use a clean room because have say 10% failure due to dust but for a modder who is using an old drive, it would a 10% chance of dust is pretty good. You could probably make your own clean room with some clear plastic, DuctTape, Rubber Gloves, and coat hangers, Some felt and a vacuum cleaner. Hmm I may have a new SlashDot article for the future.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by hazzey · · Score: 2, Informative

      One article I read with regards to modding a harddrive said to do it in the bathroom. The idea was that turning on the shower to make the room steamy, also worked to remove floating dust. You have to wait until the steam is mostly gone though to do the work.

      Does anyone know if this would actually work?

    2. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by ahpx · · Score: 1

      Do it in a bathroom. No dust there.

    3. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by infochuck · · Score: 1

      This certainly will work. PDA geeks have been doing this to apply screen protectors for years.

    4. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by parasonic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I heard from one friend that one of the best ways to get dust out of the air to perform this procedure is to be in a low-dust bathroom with circulation restricted. Get a hot shower going and let the steam rise and occupy the room. Turn off the shower and wait for several minutes. Then, once the vapor has settled, much of the dust has been knocked out of the air, and it is now a lot safer to open the drive and do the quick "surgery" ... longer MBTF I suppose. This process has been done in photography for years.

    5. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "make your own clean room with some clear plastic, DuctTape, Rubber Gloves, and coat hangers, Some felt and a vacuum cleaner"

      Clear plastic, duct tape, rubber gloves, coat hangers?

      What kind of clinic are you running? And what do you use the felt and vacuum cleaner for?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by asuffield · · Score: 1

      A little more precisely... people who create hard drives use a clean room because dust that gets in the drive can be harmless initially, but after the trauma of transporting the drive, the dust particles could have moved to a position where they cause damage. So that's a drive failure which can't be caught by QA, which means it'll be failures of *shipped* drives, which gives you a reputation for drive failures. Given the fairly low rate of failures, they wouldn't bother going to the trouble if they could catch them at QA time - a 95% yield is quite good enough to justify the reduced operating costs. But in the storage industry, nothing justifies a reputation for drives that fail.

      People who open other people's hard drives to work on them use a clean room because they'd get sued if anybody found out they weren't. "Adequete precautions" and all that.

      People who are opening their own hard drives can get by without, if they don't mind a little risk. And there's techniques to mitigate the risk (in this thread).

    7. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by jafac · · Score: 1

      easier to make a glove-box than a clean-room.

      Take a glass fishtank, tape a peice of stiff clear plastic with four holes cut into it (two big enough for your wrists, two big enough for fingers), duct-tape or glue a pair of rubber gloves into the big holes, the small holes would be for an air supply, maybe a vacuum-cleaner hose, and a jury-rigged air filter from a car "cabin" filter (designed to remove dust and pollen), and maybe a static mat on the wall (which becomes the "bottom" since the front-wall is the top of the fishtank), and ground the static mat through the metal-frame of the tank, in the corner (assuming it's the kind of fishtank with a metal frame).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      the article i read in 2003 or so said soemthing bout a hot shower to incraese humidity which somehow helped the dust problem, then put it in a bag when you put it back together though u'd wanna make sure theres no condensation

      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
    9. Re:Cool Yes, Difficult Yes, Impossible No. by parasonic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This just in. The drive may have died. I suspect that a piece of dust contaminated the drive. RIP drive. $null to $null

  19. The real question is. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

    will the acrylic melt if he uses the drive in his server and posts the link to Slashdot?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  20. Definately nothing new. by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

    Hard drive windowing was done in a homebrew fashion back in the late '90s/early '00s when casemodding was just making it big.

    Hell, there's a 20GB Western Digital with an acrylic window sitting on my floor right now, as a result of my roommate getting bored last year after he upgraded the drive in his Xbox. It still worked until he stepped on it.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  21. News that never mattered, even in 2001. by jpetts · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  22. Old news by XCorvis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    People have been doing this for literally years. This article dates from 2002, and it was the first one I found.

  23. I did this with my refrigerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had my doubts as to whether the light really did go out when the door was shut.

    Up next, purple neon refrigerator undercarriage.

  24. Not really new.. by mikael_j · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Except for cases of "hey look, I'm running my old harddrive without the lid on!" sort of things the first time I saw a guide to doing this was around '00-'01 on a website dedicated to the Abit BP6 Dual celeron motherboards, it was a lot more impressive five years ago, now it's really just old news..

    /Mikael

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  25. /.'ed by mrhandstand · · Score: 0, Offtopic



    Done. Finis, toast ,cooked....

    And best of all..the message in Firefox...

    "The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments." Um...OK...sure :-D

    --
    Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
  26. I can't imagine you would see anything by Nf1nk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This seems cool and all, but I can't imagine that there would be much to see. First the discs, in any of the hard drives I have cracked open and destroyed, never had any markings on them that might look cool when they spin. and second the only part you might be able to tell if it was moving is the read head this would be cool to watch, but the odds of screwing up your hard drive seem far too high to justify watching a read head move back and forth.
    but I have never seen the need to add neon lights and clear view windows to my case either.

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  27. Kudos. by CronicBurn · · Score: 1

    Well even though it has been done before, and we've all read about it before... how many of them have made it into slashdot infamy? :) Not so many.

    So for that, I say: Great job kid. You did something I haven't done... but then again. there's a lot I haven't done. So... um... yeah.

    All in all, it's a neat little thing to do, for cool-points. However, with a newer, larger harddrive it would be MUCH cooler, and worth way more points. ;)

    --
    if I were able to see further, it was because I stood on the shoulders of Giants -Newton
  28. Cool! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    My time machine WORKS! I travelled all the way back to February 6th, 2002!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  29. MTBF by Massacrifice · · Score: 2, Informative

    He must have seriously reduced the reliability of the drive doing so. It still works, for now. Give it a few months, though and it'll start to wither.

    A friend had once removed the entire sealing rubber strip around his HDD (circa 1995) because it was coming off by bits anyway and we were all very impressed that it was still working! But after a few weeks, he started to lose more and more data.

    With hard drives, errors are not as black and white as with CPU or other "live" components of the computer. Most of what you need (and what can be damaged) on a HD is dormant and thus, hard to know the exact moment of failure.

    --
    -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
    1. Re:MTBF by dhollist · · Score: 1

      He claims that his modification was trouble free, but if it was, what happened to the photos he took on his first attempt? Could it be that he transferred the photos from his digital camera to the newly windowed drive for safekeeping? :-O

      From the article:
      "The second question I took my best stab at answering with several paragraphs of text describing how the mod was done. But my pictures from the first drive were lost. So I'm pleased to share with you my newly completed walkthrough with pictures."

    2. Re:MTBF by rew · · Score: 1

      If you seal the drive with plexiglass, you have a window of a couple of hours that is tricky. During those hours, the dust that got in will have been caught in the filter, and from then on, chances are the drive will continue to work.

      The problem is if you leave an open connection to the environment: If you allow air to go in and out unfiltered, you continue to risk crashing the head. e.g. your friend who removed the rubber.

  30. I've done this with NO LID by maxrate · · Score: 1

    I've opened my drives lid, ran windows etc with it opened for a couple of days. The drive was 120g maxtor. Works fine, low dust environment. It's just about the dust level, that's all.

    1. Re:I've done this with NO LID by burwaco · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, a pc is like a vacuum cleaner, it sucks up any dust around it, that drive wouldn't last an hour.

    2. Re:I've done this with NO LID by maxrate · · Score: 1
      Drive wasn't in the PC you fuck. Who the fuck said it was in a pc case?

      Go suck a dick - Why the fuck would I lie about this?

  31. Eh? by gmerideth · · Score: 1

    I have to agree, whats the big deal? Hell I ran a 20MB WD drive one afternoon with *no* cover on it what so ever and the damm thing worked just fine for about 4 1/2 hours then started developing a nasty little 'tick tick tick' that I can't say wasn't just the fact the drive was ancient and was dying anyways.

    --
    Why do overlook and oversee mean opposite things?
  32. Now I can see my hard drive crash by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...IN REAL TIME!

    Microsoft will be suing for patent infringement for putting windows on hard drives.

    Just for fun, a hard drive undone: http://common.ziffdavisinternet.com/util_get_image /9/0,1425,sz=1&i=93587,00.jpg

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  33. I did this a while ago... by impactdni · · Score: 3, Informative

    I did this a while ago... Worked nicely... Quite nice for a PVR box (watch the needle go to town on the platters) - http://www.absoluteinsight.net/68

  34. Bzzzzt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing new... Several guides exist in the modding community.

    I just heard about a poor little girl dying of cancer and wanted to receive a postcard from every state. It's such a good cause. If you can spare a minute, please send her a postcard...

  35. Re:sh17 by CronicBurn · · Score: 1

    What are you on dude? I want some.

    Seriously.

    --
    if I were able to see further, it was because I stood on the shoulders of Giants -Newton
  36. Cleanroom? by itomato · · Score: 1

    What's the lintiest room per square (cubic, even!) foot in your house?

    The bathroom.

    Toilet paper fuzz, towel lint, bellybutton lint, hair, bah.

    (#3800? I didn't think you guys bothered anymore!)

    1. Re:Cleanroom? by bad+jerkface · · Score: 0

      Toilet paper fuzz, towel lint, bellybutton lint, hair, bah.

      You forgot about all the microscopic poo particles floating around.

      --
      It's a hand twinkler, you dumbass! And I got a bag of whoopass for you!
    2. Re:Cleanroom? by Tongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing about a bathroom is you can turn on the shower very hot, causing a lot of steam. This will cause all of the lint, fuzz, and bellybuttong gunk to stick to something, leaving the air a little more dust free.

      Or something like that.

    3. Re:Cleanroom? by itomato · · Score: 1

      Now your "cleanroom" has 80% humidity?

      I can see your point if you let the steam dissipate.

      BTW, it works with *rank stank* as well, though not as good a match..

  37. HDD would never work in a vacuum.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Informative

    The heads actually "float" above the platters on a tiny layer of air. Remove the air, and the heads would never lift off the surface, and would be destroyed in seconds.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:HDD would never work in a vacuum.... by d-rock · · Score: 1

      Actually, I came back from vacation one time to a Linux box that was hung and making weird noises. When I finally pulled out the hard drive and shook it, it rattled:

      The heads crashed and machined through the platter!

      Derek

      --
      Don't Panic...
  38. Do the same thing with your brain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remove the top of your skull, a dremel tool with a 1 inch circular saw blade will work nicely, cover it with a lettuce keeper turned upside down, and you too can look like a martian from a bad B movie (as opposed to a martian from a bad A movie starring Tom Cruise). Plus you will be eligible for a Darwin award (all geeks being eligible on the first qualification, no children).

  39. It was first on Digg, but.... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    I know that by my ID number I'm not a "seasoned veteran", but just thought I'd add my two cents. I'll still be at Slashdot because I don't have to search through n00b postings to see the decent ones. Theres nothing better than browsing at 4.

    As far as this article goes, it would be even cooler to paint glowinthedark-glue on the heads. Then disable the top platter (if this is even possible) and install a row of LED's perpendicular to the circle. You could display the time, the latest slashdot heading, etc...

  40. Huzzah! by itomato · · Score: 1

    Now *THAT* is newsworthy!

    - but - it won't play for some reason. (WMP/Quicktime)

    1. Re:Huzzah! by Malc · · Score: 1

      This is a valid AVI file.

        The filesize is 964 KB (or 987,136 bytes). This file has 458 bytes of extra "garbage" at the end that is not part of the data yet is not marked as "junk" either. This is not usually a serious problem, however, and is unlikely to cause a problem.

      Codec: H.263
      Runtime 57s - 128x96 @ 20fps (136 Kb/s)

  41. Air by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the others have said, the head needs air to float. In fact, last time I checked, hard drives actually list a maximum operating altitude, I think only 15,000 feet usually, not all that high. But I could be wrong about the actual altitude.

    1. Re:Air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typically it's between 9,000 and 10,000 feet (density altitude). I just learned this recently: a friend of mine is a private pilot, and he destroyed 3 iPod minis before he realized they were always failing when he'd fly his (unpressurized) aircraft to 10,000 feet on a long trip. I'm also a pilot and aircraft owner, and luckily heard this story before buying my iPod, so got a Nano instead (no hard drive).

      On commercial aircraft they typically keep the cabin altitude at 8,000 feet so it's not an issue. (Though I was once on a huge 767 flying over the pacific that was pressurized to 4,000 feet, according to my altimeter.)

    2. Re:Air by das_cookie · · Score: 1

      Absolute bunk. I regularly use my laptop on major commercial flights flying at 30,000 ft or more, never yet had a problem!

      --

      You! Yes, YOU! Out of the gene pool!

    3. Re:Air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I refer the honourable gentleman to his sig.

  42. From TFA... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    "Finally, I would also like to say thanks to my roommates Mark and Ben, because with them they made this mod a whole lot easier. Originally this was Mark's idea, and he got some ideas from someplace online that isn't there anymore [NOTE: BP6.com did this awhile ago], so I would like to give credit to my roommate and whoever has done this before. If you have any other questions, feel free to Email me."

        News? C'mon guys... i even recall seeing a story about a HD window right here on Slashdot not that long ago!

  43. What are the odds... by digid · · Score: 3, Informative

    What are the odds that an old story be posted on the front page of digg and slashdot on the same day. The only difference between Digg and Slashdot mirroring each other now is that the so called "digg effect"(I wonder where they got that name) didn't even put a scratch in their server. 5 minutes after it hit the front page of slashdot grand daddy "slashdot effect" finished the job.

  44. WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nasty reflectoporn troll!

    Go back to selling your teapots on ebay!

    1. Re:WARNING! by grub · · Score: 1

      Reflectoporn?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:WARNING! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Huh? At first I thought he said "Reflectopopcorn" and I said, "PARTY!!!!". ;P I didn't know you sold tea pots... ;O

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    3. Re:WARNING! by grub · · Score: 1


      I do have a nice pic for people that try to view the directory contents, I thought that's what the poster meant. ;)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:WARNING! by Petrol · · Score: 1

      Before calling 'troll' how about you actually try the link? It's a photo of a hard drive with plexi on top... That's not porn by any definition.

      --
      ...and that's the end of our show. Donk!
    5. Re:WARNING! by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      AIIIEEEEEEE!!!!! MY EYES!!!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:WARNING! by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      I tried the link.

      Got "403 Forbidden" with a very nice favicon graphic.

      Oh, "Very nice" if you were into repeated viewings of goatse.cx, that is.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
  45. They need the air by mary_will_grow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Disk drive heads ride on a blanket of air over the media. With a vacuum, they wouldn't have this air and they'd ruin the media. Thats why they have filtered vent holes.

    Some drives even control the ability of the heads to move with a wind-driven interlock mechanism (sort of like the governor on a lawnmower engine), forcing the drives to stay in the proper area when the drive isn't spinning.

    --
    Why stick up for big business?
    1. Re:They need the air by rew · · Score: 1

      Some drives even control the ability of the heads to move with a wind-driven interlock mechanism

      Most drives do this. Quantums have the wind-driven interlock. Most others do this by having a magnet hold the head-arm in the "parked" position. IBM/Hitachi park the heads OFF the platters.

      This last solution allows the heads to sometimes get parked ON the platter, and that results in the motor sometimes not being strong enough to get the drive to spin at all after that.

      Some older drives have a solenoid that releases the head assembly.

    2. Re:They need the air by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Most drives since 2000 do not have vent holes. They in fact dont have any oxygen in them at all.

      Open a drive, the platters are a shiny silvery color. Wait a few hours and theyre brown. They oxidize when they see oxygen, a filter couldnt filter oxygen and moisture.

      Most drives have a thin flexible barrier that compensates in the atmosphere pressure difference between the factory and place of use. Its usually a thin aluminum sticker that says DO NOT REMOVE with enough play to bulge or dip a little. I'll bet its just argon or helium inside.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  46. Mirrors! by demon411 · · Score: 2, Informative
    well mirrordot only has a mirror of the first page so here is a mirror of the 4 pages, skip to the last one for the finished product ;)

    1 2 3 4

  47. He obviously works for ..... by epicstruggle · · Score: 1

    the patent office.

    --
    "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
  48. Big Brother by Belseth · · Score: 1

    Yeah but the drive is paranoid and confused now. It keeps asking for privacy software.

  49. "dupe" from slashdot by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Incredible Invisible Case

    Another hit from'02.

    1. Re:"dupe" from slashdot by macmastery · · Score: 1

      Is that a "SlashDupe"? :-)

    2. Re:"dupe" from slashdot by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I remember reading the original article too. The part I find especially amusing is that Taco posted today's article and the one in '02 as well. My guess is that he is trying to duplicate himself for a sort of multiplicity thing.

  50. Even better by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Or a stained glass window. Depicting that flying noodle whatsis. And a light to make it all spooky and glowy.

  51. Memories of the Old Days by Egonis · · Score: 1

    When I would have been about 14, a friend and I disassembled an ST-225 MFM Hard Drive, which we had running on an RLL controller to get however extra MBytes out of it. (not many)

    Anyhow, we pulled the top off, since it had so many bad sectors, it was amazing... and did a low-level format while it was open, worked for awhile...

    Until I sneezed on it. :)

    Thought I'd share that one as a playful warning to not be an idiot with a drive open.

  52. Does not higher density mean higher risk? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    My guess is that because there's more density to newer drives, that makes it that much more important to be cautious about dust and particulate matter. A 3 GB disk has a lower density and can tolerate dust better. I guess a comparison woiuld be that (and this is just an example) a particle of dust might cover 10 sectors on a 3 GB drive, but the same particle might cover 100 sectors on a 30 GB drive, making the 30 GB drive much more susceptible to problems caused by dusst. So, that wouldn't make higher capacity drives more difficult to mod but you would have to have a much cleaner environment for it to work than you would with a 3 GB drive. Again, I'm not a hard drive engineer, but that would be my guess.

    Of course, there's also the whole "risk" issue. This guy was only willing to risk this with an arguably obsolete drive. Would he be willing to do the same thing with a much newer drive that is more susceptible to dust? I think that's also where the whole "big whoop" attitiude is coming in.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Does not higher density mean higher risk? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i think the article submitter was misinformed. iirc it is widely belive to be virtually impossible (read not feasible without a good cleanroom) to do it to modern drives.

      i'm guessing from the submission that the submitter did not realise this was NOT a modern drive.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Does not higher density mean higher risk? by javamann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Higher density means the heads fly closer to the platter and small dust particles would 'crash' the head. This means the head will hit the particle and either drag it, or bump over it. Kinda like hitting a body with your car. I wouldn't worry too much, both the heads and platters are covered with a diamond like coating. Also, any 'floating' particle would be spun off when the disk started to spin up. I once took apart a working 6G WD drive and the inside looked like my car's brake pads with all of the dust in the drive.

    3. Re:Does not higher density mean higher risk? by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Higher density means the heads fly closer to the platter and small dust particles would 'crash' the head. This means the head will hit the particle and either drag it, or bump over it. Kinda like hitting a body with your car. I wouldn't worry too much, both the heads and platters are covered with a diamond like coating. Also, any 'floating' particle would be spun off when the disk started to spin up. I once took apart a working 6G WD drive and the inside looked like my car's brake pads with all of the dust in the drive.

      I have taken apart lots of drives and only ever saw one with obvious circular scuffing all around the drive. Every other drive had to my eye perfect mirror finishes.

      As I have stated elsewhere, I took apart a drive with growing bad sectors and within SECONDS of being opened, the drive was DESTROYED. It initially worked and while open and spinning it died completely, returning no data at all (forever trying to read).

      I would not be telling people to not worry. Every drive I have ever seen has had warning stickers which stated that opening or removal of any sticker (some cover holes in the casing) will void the warrantee. Those warnings are there for a reason! Cigarette smoke particles can kill a drive (I'm not talking about cigarette ash, I'm talking about the particles which make up the smoke!), imagine what household dust can do. And this was true for drives of 15 years ago. Modern drives have much lower flight heights, making the situation worse. If I ever accidentally scratched through or punctured a drive hole sticker, I would frantically image the drive, then zero it out and then turf it (or maybe pull it apart and keep the nice looking platters).

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    4. Re:Does not higher density mean higher risk? by GatorMan · · Score: 1

      As I have stated elsewhere, I took apart a drive with growing bad sectors and within SECONDS of being opened, the drive was DESTROYED. It initially worked and while open and spinning it died completely, returning no data at all (forever trying to read).

      In order to take that top cover off you had to remove one or two screws (depends on model) that keep the spindle and head assembly perfectly aligned. There are perimeter screws and then there are one or two toward the centerline of the drive, one should be offset (this would be the head assembly) and the other is perfectly centered (for the spindle screw). Removing those allows some movement which would cause the instant destruction you described. Congrats, you learned the hard way.

    5. Re:Does not higher density mean higher risk? by runderwo · · Score: 1

      I have opened many hard drives and never had to remove a cover screw that affected anything besides the cover itself. Can you cite a particular model please?

    6. Re:Does not higher density mean higher risk? by GatorMan · · Score: 1

      Anything from the Maxtor DiamondMax series, almost every IBM/Hitachi, almost all WD Caviar Arch. V and newer series, Seagate 7200.x series, Samsung SpinPoint series...and thats just some of the 3.5" lineup.

      http://www.harddriveupgrade.com/hard_drive_120gxp. jpg

      Take a loot there. The T8 screw right above the label (to the left in this pic) goes directly into the top of the platter spindle, affecting alignment. Between the capacity spec and the model number under the label is another T8 screw that goes directly into the pivot of the head assembly.

    7. Re:Does not higher density mean higher risk? by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Congrats, you learned the hard way.

      The "hard way" being the loss of a dying drive which I knew was about to die and which I was comitting to quicker death in the interest of seeing a drive working while open? Oh-kay. Doesn't seem like such a "hard way" to learn to me.

      Good point by the way. Even more reason not to open a good drive and put a silly window on it.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  53. Geez guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know you people are really anti-Microsoft but come on guys, installing Windows successfully on a hard drive can't be that newsworthy.

  54. Agreed this is old school by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find the old link, can anyone else find the slashdot post on this from several years ago?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  55. Only a 3 GB drive? by cogito+ergo+blog · · Score: 1

    I've taken apart several hard drives, usually to visually inspect them as a post mordem after they crash. Given the amount of work involved it seems pretty lame to bother putting a 3GB drive back together again. The resonably strong permanent magnets inside the drive are probably more usefull than another tiny drive lying around gathering dust. /still working on my RAUD (redundant array of USD disks)

    --
    "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
  56. Actually... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    you've got roughly the same amount of guts as the other guy. We all have about 7 meters of small intestines, on average...

  57. Heck I Just Did This by fdiskne1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Our intern was messing around with old hard drives and decided to take off the cover of one, plug it in and let it run. It worked fine, so I touched my finger to it. It still ran, so I licked my finger and touched it. Oops. Blue Screen. I didn't think the heads were close enough to the disk to get a good read so I put some pressure behind it. Let me tell you, the noise that makes isn't nearly so annoying to the person doing it as it is to everyone else in the room. The hard drive platter now looks quite similar to an LP record's grooves. Cool. Okay, I didn't put a window on the drive. So what? This was more fun.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
    1. Re:Heck I Just Did This by mucktoad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I once super-glued rabbit ears to my penis...can I be in the hardware section of slashdot....heeeeyaaaaa

    2. Re:Heck I Just Did This by RobinH · · Score: 1

      That depends... were they the TV antenna type of rabbit ears, or the real thing? If the latter, you really belong on a goatse page, not slashdot. ;)

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    3. Re:Heck I Just Did This by superbam · · Score: 1

      Hahaha!! Are they still there? Did they help your reception?

      --
      We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas. - Ned's Mom
    4. Re:Heck I Just Did This by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

      Ha ha, I did the same thing once, but rather than licking my finger, I like the platter. Don't do this, the plater will steal the sliva and your tonge will get burnt.

  58. Hard drive resurrection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something similar was featured on hack a day a few days ago, someone brought a 20GB laptop hard drive back from the dead, after first practicing on a pair of 160GB drives.

    1. Re:Hard drive resurrection by TheTwoBest · · Score: 1

      I think you meant 160MB drives. Claims they were purchaced for 2 dollars each.

  59. Too risky for the price by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think I would do that with my HD It just is too expensive to corrupt.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  60. yawnnn by ipn1nj4 · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has even dipped into the modding community knows that this has been done before

  61. Near miss on a dup? by WareW01f · · Score: 1

    Though this was familiar...

    Then quotethed said same Taco: Besides inspiration, the site features practical advice, like why not to window mod hard drives.

    Course, pointing these things out only serves to help one reflect on exactly how much time one has wasted reading /. in the first place...

  62. So does that mean no ^______^ ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on TripMaster, have a heart!

  63. Too much free time and money. by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really to be safe doing this you would need a clean room. One speck of dust could ruin the drive. When you install the window you better be sure you seal it will so no dust can sneak in. Kiss any warranty on the drive goodbye.
    I really don't get these case mods at all. All I want to see of my computer is the monitor and all I want to here is what comes out the speakers.
    When a few people did them it was kind of cool. Now that you can BUY a case with a window big deal.
    Want to impress people. Show me an AMD X2 system with SLI and four really fast big drives in a RAID 0+1 that is totally silent and does need to have it's coolant tank filled. Oh and it has to fit under my desk.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Too much free time and money. by imboboage0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You DON'T have a case with a window? you must have a small e-penis.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    2. Re:Too much free time and money. by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I limit case mods to improving airflow on machines with 5 or more hard drives, especially since I can't get any more SuperMicro SC-750A cases. Before the days of really huge drives I once had 12 hard drives (6 IDE, 6 SCSI) crammed into one of those cases - I had to fabricate additional brackets to fit all the drives and that system need a LOT of airflow to keep cool (11 or 12 fans).What did I do with the storage? ATI TV Tuner card - yes, the old one with the proprietary ATI Media Channel connector. I had many, many Simpsons, South Park, and Seinfeld episodes recorded in ATI's glorious ATI VCR codec. What a waste of time, but it was fun. I still have many of the episodes archived on CD-R somewhere. Interestingly, most of the drives are still running to this day in other machines; only a couple of the Western Digital drives died. I still use that case today for my single Pentium 4, and right now I have "only" six drives installed, and "only" 4 fans. Case mods: fabricated 3.5" drive bays plus I used a die grinder to cut out the inset/flat part of the louvers over one of the fans to get more air in AND quiet the thing down.

      (Tivo? **** Tivo! Now it's MythTV! I'll never buy a PVR that randomly decides what I can or can't record, or when something should be deleted)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Too much free time and money. by rew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even with a cleanroom it's not trivial: I've ruined two drives trying to do this, using the cleanroom. Twice I managed to get the window too close to a running drive, so that the hub would scrape off some acrylic. From then on, it's game over.

      I should take the time to create a sufficient spacer, so that this doesn't happen again.

    4. Re:Too much free time and money. by vettemph · · Score: 1

      >>>> you would need a clean room.

        This kid is 15 years old, Probably hasn't cleaned his room in 3 years!

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    5. Re:Too much free time and money. by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      Window? Who needs a window when I can just leave the side off? ;)

    6. Re:Too much free time and money. by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      psht. if you leave the side off, it's noobish. you don't wanna be a n00b do you?

      Just as a side note, I actually DO have a case with a window. and a neon light. and chrome RAM. and a chrome power supply. basically, I have a huge e-penis. But I do it for fun. Like a hobby, ya know?

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    7. Re:Too much free time and money. by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      Want to impress people. Show me an AMD X2 system with SLI and four really fast big drives in a RAID 0+1 that is totally silent and does need to have it's coolant tank filled. Oh and it has to fit under my desk.
      Personally, I think SLI is among the top of the most pointless ideas that have been hatched in recent years. It costs twice as much, takes up twice as many PCIE slots, draws twice as much power, makes twice as much noise (well, not by the dB measure), and what do you get? Maybe twice the performance, but many applications don't even show that much. Your expensive SLI setup will also most likely be obsoleted by the next GPU core nVidia releases. And for what? Running Doom 3 at 1600x1200 and 80 FPS instead of 1280x1024 and 60 FPS? Sorry, but I just don't see whatever could justify the choice of buying a SLI setup. It scales less than linearily in performance, while the performance of a single GPU core increases exponentially over time. Why not just wait half a year and buy the newest nVidia card instead?

      Sure, I'm no gamer (the only thing my 3D acceleration ever gets used for is the fancy glxhacks in xscreensaver), so maybe I just don't understand it, but does someone have a SLI setup and really feels it was worth it? If so, did it feel worth it for any other reason than getting a higher 3DMark score than anyone else?

    8. Re:Too much free time and money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as you don't mind the copper piping going through your floor and several feet into the ground to cool everything in the case, then it might be plausible.

      Either that, or do you mind moving to the arctic?

    9. Re:Too much free time and money. by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      I understand why people with too much money do this, and I appreciate it as it makes gfx cards cheaper for all of us in the end...

      what I don't understand is why they don't make single cards with 2 gpus on them... they'd probably end up being cheaper then SLI, and you wouldn't have needed special mobos to run them. I realize heat/size may be an issue, but I do believe this is possible... I think I remember reading about a card with two radeons on it.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    10. Re:Too much free time and money. by hardburn · · Score: 1

      When 3dfx did SLI way back with the VooDoo 2, the first cards only had a single chipset ("GPU" had not been invented yet). A year or two later, when single-chipset VooDoo 2's were starting to show their age, SLI on a single card started to come out.

      VooDoo 2 was a great chipset for its time. Held up with newer games well past its prime.

      Of course, the real reason is that SLI makes spoiled rich kids spend twice as much on their video cards, a reason which goes away if you put two GPUs on one card . . .

      --
      Not a typewriter
    11. Re:Too much free time and money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1. Get a really really BIG desk.
      Step 2. Nope. Bigger than that.

    12. Re:Too much free time and money. by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      what I don't understand is why they don't make single cards with 2 gpus on them...

      Old news

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    13. Re:Too much free time and money. by Shanep · · Score: 1

      VooDoo 2 was a great chipset for its time. Held up with newer games well past its prime.

      Actually, it didn't hold up well at all. It was severely hampered by the PCI bus and the "AGP" Voodoo cards were not being used in AGP mode, rather some PCI compatibility mode.

      The fact is, that GPU focused games of the time were being made to at least run well on the older Voodoo2 cards, because there were so many out there. The game houses were targetting thier market and thus slowing development due to the Voodoo2. 3Dfx accelerated 3D game technologies and then severely slowed it down by choosing to stick with PCI.

      Here, take a look at a Matrox G200 (!) kicking the shit out of a Voodoo2 SLI setup! This situation, where a MUCH slower 3D card is killing the "awesome" Voodoo2 SLI because the Voodoo2's are: 1/ PCI and 2/ storing the SAME texture data in each of the cards memory because 12MB+12MB does not give you 24MB in an SLI setup (the data MUST be mirrored, except for the frame buffer).

      "S3's own `mon2.dm2' demo, using their own `newS3' map is using a whole lot of really large textures, making the scenery look very detailed and pretty. It would have been a shame if Savage3D would not score well in it, but this would almost have happened. In the latest driver I received, the `AA" setting needs to be enabled to run mon2.dm2 at a decent speed. Anyway, in mon2.dm2 the Savage3D scores higher and higher the more test runs you do. I decided to put down the result of the second run. Matrox' G200 looks very good at mon2.dm2 as well, obviously due to its AGP 2x interface. It reaches about 66% of the Savage3D scores and this without texture compression. The coolest thing are the TNT results however. TNT scores better than Savage3D although TNT does not use texture compression!!! Only with a Celeron 266 TNT looks a little slower than Savage3D, which is another proof for the CPU dependency of TNT in Quake 2. 3Dfx products have yet to learn what AGP means, so the mon2.dm2 is a serious threat to them. 22 fps scored by a $500 Voodoo2 SLI combo looks a bit sad, doesn't it? Banshee looks even worse, its `AGP-interface' only consists of the mechanical connector for the AGP slot."

      I find it completely shocking that 3Dfx had the talent to design such a great video card and then completely fail to see the value of AGP over PCI. That failure ultimately killed them. It gave their competitors a window of oportunity to make lots of money to put into more R&D while 3Dfx played catch-up. 3Dfx couldn't, it was too late, they died.

      Games never looked that great in 16 bit colour anyway.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    14. Re:Too much free time and money. by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Probably a stupid question, but why didn't you just put the window on the outside of the casing?

    15. Re:Too much free time and money. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Because it would look as good. I mean the ONLY reason to do it is for looks.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    16. Re:Too much free time and money. by LeeMeador · · Score: 1

      >Oh and it has to fit under my desk

      I want it to double as a mouse pad and be about that size.

      As long as we are wishing ...

    17. Re:Too much free time and money. by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      No doubt if you could get the thickness of the plastic to match the shape of the hard drive you could make the whole top of the drive completely flat....which wouldn't look too bad IMO. Not as good for cooling however.

  64. Why isnt somthing like this commercialy avaliable? by blakehew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why has no HD manufacture made windowed w LEDs Hard drives? Is it the shielding? I have seen clear materials that provide EMI shielding! That would be sweet. Then all the case manufacutres would start rearanging their drive bays so you could take advantage of them. I think something like a comercial windowed HD would sell like crazy.

    --
    -What if the Hokey Pokey is what its all about?-
  65. You're not fooling me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't feign ignorance!

    re flect o porn

  66. Digg vs Dot by dark-br · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Digg vs Dot is a simple website that was put together to highlight the act of crossposting articles among two very popular sites, digg.com and Slashdot.org.

    Points are scored in the following manner:

    +3 for first post
    +1 for ties (within 50 min)
    -1 ripping off the title & url.

    Have a look at the scores :)

    1. Re:Digg vs Dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better! I'm one of the many "you worthless shit digg story farming shits" type moaners. Learning of the existence of this site has absolutely made my day.
      Personally I think eventually this practice will drive me to stop visiting both sites, not that anyone cares.
      And a big FUCK YOU to the worthless farmers doing this, who are clearly so used to sitting in their bedrooms playing MMORPGs that they are ruining a useful real world resource with their pathetic 12 year old farming b.s.

    2. Re:Digg vs Dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you aren't ruining a useful real world resource with your patheric 12 year old whining b.s?

    3. Re:Digg vs Dot by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Slashdot has about 1/2 the score, except in the "list everything" digg actually outnumbers in coping article with title and all, but still wins by posting more stories. Not that that is any surprise considering how digg works.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re:Digg vs Dot by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Way to include the URL in your post.

  67. Old'D by cosmotron · · Score: 0

    A graduate student did this already at my University while doing reasearch for his thesis.

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
  68. laminar flow hood by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    A nice laminar flow hood with better than 3 micron filtration should do the job nicely. Wash an clean then dry the drive. Make sure everything is fresh and there is no linty things around - then work in the clean air stream.

    Laminar flow hoods are not that expensive. You can buy one for about $500 or less and make one for a little over $100. Any good biology/mycology lab should be able to provide leads. Or just take a class in biology and mod the drive in the lab. It'll give new meaning to the idea of keeping your code bug free.

  69. Shameless Plug by winkydink · · Score: 1

    Network Mirror has all of the pages of this and (almost) every other multipage article that hits Slashdot.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Shameless Plug by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      It's good to know there are numerous versions of the oldest "New" advice on doing this.

  70. Big Whoop by GmAz · · Score: 1

    Many people have done it over at www.overclockersclub.com. I almost did it to mine until I started cutting the acrylic and realized my dremmel skills were horrible. The key is making a dust free or as close to possible dust free environment. Everyone I have heard doing it used the bathroom trick. Get the shower running real hot and steam up the bathroom. turn off the water and let the steam go away. It will trap the dust in the air in the steam and drop it to the floor. Make sure you work fast and have everything cut and ready to do the work. Make the switch and you are done. People also do the work in plastic ziploc bags.

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  71. What "Guts"? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    You buy a hard drive for 50 bucks, try it, if it doesn't work you're out 50 bucks.

    This is what is considered "guts" now, putting down 50 bucks on a whim? Man you need to get out a little.

    This is "Guts", not some nonsense with a hard drive window.

    1. Re:What "Guts"? by pianomahnn · · Score: 1

      No, that's survival instincts.

    2. Re:What "Guts"? by gtt · · Score: 1

      No, it's just stupid. He went climbing alone and left a note at home that said "Utah".

    3. Re:What "Guts"? by pianomahnn · · Score: 1

      Hiking alone with no location information was stupid. Removing his arm to save his body was not.

  72. Re:Video - WTF? by infochuck · · Score: 1

    Eh - hate to rain on your parade, but a 10g (I assume you mean gigs) MFM drive, uh, doesn't exist, I'm pretty sure. It's been a LONG time, but I think MFM went by the wayside at around 100-200 MEGABYTES.

  73. unclean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I'm sure he did all the necessary ritual purifications. Otherwise the Cybergods would have struck him dead.

  74. Nothing New At All... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    For christs sake, I had installed a window in a Western Digital Caviar drive about 3 YEARS ago... AND I got the instructions from the internet so people had already been doing this FOR YEARS. Some breaking news. This guy is hardly the first.

    If you google for installing a window in a hard drive you will get thousands of howto/tutorials. Man, I'd expect this "quality" from Zonk but not Taco.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  75. Re:Why isnt somthing like this commercialy avaliab by HairyCanary · · Score: 1

    I was just about to post this exact comment, and then saw yours ;-). So I'll just second your thought -- why has no manufacturer done this on a production drive? Then we could long lasting drives and bling too.

  76. Doing this for years. by ebuck · · Score: 1

    Yes, people have been doing this for years.

    And Slashdot has been reporting people doing this, for years.

    It's just that Slashdot keeps reporting it as a "never-been-done-before" event, when it should be reporting this as "another-person-has-just-performed" event.

    1. Re:Doing this for years. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      They've even had follow up stories from when the people who have done this on their > 120GB drives have had them die a few weeks (which *always* happens on the bigger drives) later write about it on their modding site.

      When somebody gets this to work on a modern drive and it lasts longer than a month, it'll be news. When the latest drives were 1-2GB, the hard drive companies would have clear-topped drives in their trade show booths to show off the internals... Not anymore. Vibrations are such an issue in high capacity drives that if the rigidity of the case is reduced the drive eats itself in hours.

  77. I've run a naked drive for a week by yeremein · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was writing a disk imaging utility for my company and I had to deal with bad sectors properly. Couldn't find a drive with bad sectors so I decided to make one. I pulled the cover off an old hard drive and hooked it up to my machine, figuring the dust would cause bad sectors soon enough.

    The blasted thing ran just fine for a week.

    Eventually I tried writing on the platter with a dry-erase marker while it was spinning. That didn't even kill it. But a little scratch with a screwdriver killed it dead.

    1. Re:I've run a naked drive for a week by alienw · · Score: 1

      Actually, modern hard drives never have bad sectors. Unlike the 80s drives, modern ones have ECC. Either they will read perfectly, or they will get stuck trying to read a bad sector. If the sector really is bad, it might return a failed read, but I don't think you can detect bad sectors on them the same way you used to be able to (write one value, get another). If you are trying to write to the drive, it will just remap any bad sectors to a reserved one and pretend like nothing happened.

    2. Re:I've run a naked drive for a week by runderwo · · Score: 1

      Yes, and then what happens when the spare sector pool runs out? IOW, you're full of shit. Sorry. I have handled MANY drives with so many bad sectors that the spare pool was exhausted and they spilled over to be host-visible.

    3. Re:I've run a naked drive for a week by xperiment229 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they got that idea by studying the spaceships that laned in Roswell; the discovery just took a while because they had to put all that thought into the weather ballon story then pay off all of the witnesses.

      --
      "Your past is simply a collection of moments stored in memory and encoded into the person that you are today.
  78. Not impressed by Psychedelic_Bard · · Score: 0

    While this is very cool, it's not impressive at all. My friends and I did the same thing while in 11th grade. The drive is still at my old highschool, works perfectly.

  79. One time at band camp . . . by dweebzilla · · Score: 1

    One time at band camp - my roommate ran a 500MB drive without its case in his butt crack for three or four hours . . .

    OK, this really leaves the following question. Is modding your hard disk in this way a precursor to moving out of your parent's basement? Or is posting something as lame as this, and for that matter replying to it . . .

    ~ Either way it still beats actually working. (messing w/ the drive that is, not living in ones parents basement, )

    --
    Get your tagline off my lawn.
  80. A Working WD From 1997??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a WD Caviar 22500, which broke down like 15 minutes after the warranty had expired. That's the only time I've lost data due to a hdd failure. My friend bought a larger Caviar at the same time, and it only lasted for about three years.

    A working WD drive from 1997 is worth a mention, this mod, however, is not.

  81. Quite possible with modern hard drives too by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Really... A modern hard drive isn't any more complicated than an old one. You just have the issue that more data is crammed into the same space, meaning that physical damage affects more data.

    The trick is to create a totally dust-free environment. If you have a clean room, there is no reason why you couldn't do this with a 250 GB hard drive. This means if you are a HDD manufacturer, NASA, or the like, this is trivial. DOing it yourself though might be possible but it would be a much bigger project :-)

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Quite possible with modern hard drives too by fourtyfive · · Score: 1

      Actually, I found it quite interesting to learn that needing a "clean room" in HD repair is really a misnomer. Its not a ROOM persay, its more of a "work bench" with a HEPA filtration system attached to the top. This way, it just "cleans" the air and sucks all the dust up, instead of it settling on teh drive. From what I've seen, they cost between 3-10 thousand dollars. (So relatively cheap).

    2. Re:Quite possible with modern hard drives too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, so I could put a window in my Hard Drive for the measly price of $3000? What a bargain!

    3. Re:Quite possible with modern hard drives too by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      You could probably build your own for far less. Hepa filters, air pumps, etc, plexiglass, etc. If you are only working on your hdd for the coolness factor and don't care if there is a small but significant chance of damaging the hard drive platters, then I say go for it :-)

      If you need more help, I would suggest talking with an engineer, etc.

      BTW, if I were to do this here are a few suggestions I would have:

      Depending on how thorough you want to be you could probably build one for under $1k.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  82. Slashdot by squoozer · · Score: 1

    News for nerds. Stuff that's really really old!

    Has this story been stuck in a moderation queue for 5 years or something?

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  83. Apparently NOT by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    8')

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  84. Already Hackaday'd by winphreak · · Score: 1

    Yeah, not news here. Cutting open a harddrive to install an acrylic window is a good concept. Knowing that it ruins it should be reason enough not to.

    And, proof that it is at least one year old, November 8th of 2004 begs to disagree. I even have proof!

    --
    "I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm."
  85. Doing this for years.-Window into "/." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's just that Slashdot keeps reporting it as a "never-been-done-before" event, when it should be reporting this as "another-person-has-just-performed" event."

    Here's something to try. Put a plexiglass window into the side of Slashdot, so we can see Taco, Neal, and others sit around and do nothing.

  86. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows are the most useless thing ever.

  87. PC Bling Bling by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    This finally answers the question, how far will modders go in their hardware and lighting fetishes? I'm waiting for people to start chroming and putting windows into the chips in their systems.

    I've decided to go the anti-modder route, an all black case with NO windows or lights (except for indicator lights). I just use it for, *gasp*, computing.

    Ok, I admit Lian-Li's case aquarium is pretty cute.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:PC Bling Bling by blaterza · · Score: 1

      You also have to remeber if it was not for modders then your black PC would be white and turn yellow in a few years. You have to give some of credit. It may seem lame at first but better things come along sooner or later.

  88. ??!! [OT] by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Can anyone explain to me what's up with Disney and (dancing) elephants?

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:??!! [OT] by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Elephants are big, ponderous, heavy, and slow.

      Thus, they provide a certain visual humor when depicted dancing, that is not matched by, say people dancing, or meerkats dancing.

      Disney also has dancing hippos, by the way.

      And dancing crocodiles.

      And dancing bears.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:??!! [OT] by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      Can anyone explain to me what's up with Disney and (dancing) elephants?

      Walt had too many bong hits in his formative years?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:??!! [OT] by hummassa · · Score: 1

      Oh, you are right, but dancing elephants are more of a recurrent thing on Disney's movies, that's why I asked.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  89. Hard Drive Window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol no that's not a window.

  90. OLLLDDDDDD!!!!!...... by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    One of the first thing modded "back in the day".

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  91. So smoking is right out, uh? by crovira · · Score: 1

    Neat freaks... I suppose that I'm not allowed to eat my tunafish sandwich.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:So smoking is right out, uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife was taking an IC fabrication and packaging course at Rutgers. For the clean Room phase, they were not allowed to eat garlic 2 days prior to going in due to the fact that garlic molecules were so BIG that it would effect the clean room.

      Funny that the end of semester party was at a pizza place.

  92. Re:I did this a while ago... Question by watermodem · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why didn't you do your mod the following way.

    1) find the same type of drive in a junk box.

    2) take off the cover and use it as a mold over some mold material like clay

    3) drill air holes through the mold material

    4) put plexiglass into a warming oven

    5) clamp warm plexiglass over mold on a vaccum table and suck out air. This molds the hot plastic to the exact same internal shape as your old drive lid

    6) after cooling. Machine and fit it to same flatness and holes as original lid.

    7) test fit on junk box drive

    8) when a perfect and clean fit... do your lid swap in a clean environment

    9) Seal

  93. Re:Yippy-Skippy. - alignment by drdoc · · Score: 1

    The problem with doing this with a new drive is the alignment. Once you loosen the screws you have changed the alignment - it may never come ready again. The dust is not such a big deal, the drive has an insternal filter to catch the loose particles. The first time it spins up it will likely knock off any dust or particles. I wouldnt store my digital photo collection there...

  94. Pssh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did this with a 50MB SCSI drive from an Amiga about 10 years ago, except I never put the lid back on and it still ran fine for about a month (it housed 12 MP3s, and I knew EXACTLY when it failed...)

  95. I hear it! "No matter how thin you slice it..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Way to miss the joke.

    Both of them.

  96. But, what we all want to know is... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Does this modification void the harddrive warranty?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  97. Something new! by jimmytango829 · · Score: 1

    One might think with all the talk of this being old news, that the frequency of posts bringing this fact to light would subside. But they are going just as strong as the old news, dupes and reposts. We got it. Someone has already done this. Stop telling me.

  98. why by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1
    ??

    and was it worth to be in /.?

  99. Re:Why isnt somthing like this commercialy avaliab by timfy62 · · Score: 1

    Actually...I worked for both Digital Equipment Corporation and Conner Peripherals building HDDs and both had clear drive lids that we'd use in R&D and Failure Analysis. Maybe if you sweet-talk the manufacturer they could sell you one?

  100. You don't have permission to access hard drive. by qualico · · Score: 1

    I'm getting 403, You don't have permission to access /hard-drive-window-2/ on this server.

    Anyone else have another link?

    1. Re:You don't have permission to access hard drive. by glowworm · · Score: 1

      And even sillier is that the error documents to display that error are also illegal.

      It looks like his little home brew server melted under the SlashHoardes and he decided to take the easy way out and just chown the whole web directory to another user instead of serving a thank-you come back later or implementing a throttle.

      But then again he is running Apache 1 so he obviously doesn't really know very much at all.

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
  101. Why is this a problem? by electronerdz · · Score: 1

    Why is this a problem? If you just make sure you do it in a clean environment, and that you carefully check your seals (maybe have a dead one to test on first), there shouldn't be a problem. At least I would assume. I'd be will to try it on a hard drive, I just need a piece of plexiglass, and a few tools to cut it out with.

    --
    Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
  102. it works by ryanelm · · Score: 1

    i did it once with a cheap drive. i was able to replace the entire cover plate with a pice of acrylic. it worked just fine, the trick is not to let any dust in. have everything sanded and cleaned before you void the warranty.

  103. Bluetack by glowworm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Meh, back in the heady days of $5,000 5MB hard disks (Circa 1982) when I was a lowly PC technician we had a doctor come in with his drive that had crashed and that he hadn't backed up.

    He just had to have his data back. Being the game sort of guy I was I opened the drive case, cracked the drive and powered up to see what was happening. When the power was applied the heads would stutter and not load properly. The obvious fix was to use a little bit of bluetack to hold the counterbalance mechanism a little more firmly. The drive span up, the heads loaded and I was able to copy all his data off. Not one lost bit. Got me a nice little bonus for that. As the drive was useless to him he let me have it. I kept it running on my desk (because the business only allocated me a floppy drive computer) storing all my WordStar files and StarTrek hand copied from a magazine in GWBasic. It ran for about a year after opening - still with the bluetack inside, still with the cover just sitting on top (Not screwed down) so I could get to the mechanism easily.

    A few years later the Seagate ST225 came out. (The drive with the 120% failure rate) After working out the perfect solution for sticktion (A large hammer) we got a couple where the guard band had been overwritten. The solution for these was pretty much the same. Take off the lid. Power up. Manually load the heads. Put the lid back on. Grab all the data.

    I really can't see how this teenage n00b who has the "guts" to disassemble his drive is newsworthy when any tech worth his salt has been doing it since the HDD was invented, AND with live and valuable data!

    After all, Mainframe disk packs from the 70's and before (Which I used to load & unload on the nightshift) are open to the air devices and they ran for years.

    --
    Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
    1. Re:Bluetack by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Its courageous partly because it isnt a 1982 winchester.

      Open any new drive and the static, moisture and oxygen will kill the sensitive surface permanently. It turns brown in a few hours. I agree its still not so newsworthy.

      Now if I saw someone as much as open and close a new 1/2TB drive for 5 minutes, and still get all the data, I'd say WOW. That would be newsworthy.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    2. Re:Bluetack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, newer drives are more secure then older drives? Because you can simply drill a hole (or pop the top) and let oxygen in to kill the platters?

      (Prove it, and I smell a /. article...)

  104. leave it to the slashdot, to post 2+ yr old stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is older than dirt. why post it now? oh thats right, slashdot doesnt know how to post up to date material, or something hasnt already been posted.

  105. please tell us by Scootesti · · Score: 1

    The problem is not getting it to work at all. The problem is not seriously shortening the life span of the hard drive by opening it up in an unclean environment.

    Ok, so if the problem is not getting it to work, and is not the unclean environment, then what is it?

    yeah, I know, I'm a jerk :D

    --
    "So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet
  106. No, see... by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny

    He installed Windows and it still worked.

  107. Price per gigabyte by TheTranceFan · · Score: 1
    Admittedly OT, but yesterday I was pricing hard drives on Pricewatch and I made a graph of $/GB vs GB to see where the best value was (which, by the way, is at 320 GB).

    The raw data were:

    GB Price $/GB
    500 $354.00 $0.71
    400 $205.00 $0.51
    320 $123.00 $0.38
    300 $111.00 $0.37
    250 $90.00 $0.36
    200 $75.00 $0.38
    180 $89.00 $0.49
    160 $67.00 $0.42
    120 $59.00 $0.49
    100 $58.00 $0.58

    So today we pay as little as $0.36 per GB. The drive in the Parent's Break.com advertisement represents $166,333 per GB.

    How times have changed :-)

  108. What is there to see? by krysolid · · Score: 1


    The disks spin so fast you cannot see it,
    and the head armature moves back and forth
    so fast that would look like a blur too.

    Seems a bit silly, but I do not know if it
    would be much of a risk if you did it in a
    dust free environment and did not touch
    anything sensitive.

    1. Re:What is there to see? by Dont_Call_Me! · · Score: 1

      That's the longest haiku I've ever heard.

    2. Re:What is there to see? by TwoScoopsOfPig · · Score: 1

      Except for the lack
      Of standard syllabaric
      distribution, yes!

      --
      #include <disclaimer.h>
      #include <beer.h>
    3. Re:What is there to see? by krysolid · · Score: 1

      Yeah,
      that,
      and the fact,
      that it is,
      not,
      a haiku,
      at all. ;-)

    4. Re:What is there to see? by TwoScoopsOfPig · · Score: 1

      That would be shown by
      The bit about syllables
      In the reply, yes?

      --
      #include <disclaimer.h>
      #include <beer.h>
  109. Pressurized cabin? by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Absolute bunk. I regularly use my laptop on major commercial flights flying at 30,000 ft or more, never yet had a problem!

    Unless you're flying on a really, really low budget airline (I kid!), the cabin is pressurized to the equivalent to less than 8,000 feet altutude. This is actually an FAA regulation and a major safety issue. The atmosphere is quite thin at 30,000 feet and you'd have a hard time getting enough oxygen to stay alive.

    1. Re:Pressurized cabin? by das_cookie · · Score: 1

      It was a joke (and yes, it was pretty lame.... sorry!)

      --

      You! Yes, YOU! Out of the gene pool!

  110. That's nothing by kiddailey · · Score: 1

    You should see the acrylic window I put on my old Tandy1000 EX's external 3 1/2 drive!

  111. Re:glass doors by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

    Yes, the ones at the grocery stores. The lights are always on in there. :)

  112. Slashdot does it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot does it again..... this story is about 3 or 4 years old.
    News? um no

    1. Re:Slashdot does it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's it. /. isn't a news site, it's a nostalgia and opinion site.

      "Slow down, cowboy! It's been 43 minutes since you posted a comment!"

      God. Damn. It's off to Digg for me... Good riddance!

  113. A DELICIOUS PUN. by i_finally_got_an_acc · · Score: 1
    This guy should go into business installing windows on hard drives!

    +5 FUNNY!

    --
    "I'm not religious, but at the same time I don't get why science always has to have something to prove."
  114. poop lock by Danzigism · · Score: 0

    that bitch got DOTTED yo :-\

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  115. Many (Idiots) Thought Was Impossible by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only idiots think that opening a hard drive will somehow destroy it. Hard drives can be opened, left that way, and run for quite a long time. It's not recommended, but having a running hard drive in the open air is nothing special. It's even less special if you cover it back up again.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  116. Log Cabin Window by Dont_Call_Me! · · Score: 1

    A colonial pilgrim has done what was thought to be impossible: he cut a hole in the wall of his house and added a window. Great ... now we're all going to want windows in our homes.

    This may be old news, so my appologies if it's already been blogged somewhere.

  117. Re:Yippy-Skippy. - alignment by marcansoft · · Score: 1

    You don't have to remove the platters, just the case. That won't change the alignment.

  118. Oooh, do they have that on computers now? by Myself · · Score: 1

    The only drive I ever put a clear cover on was a 10-meg RLL unit. Worked like a charm for months afterward. Of course, it always claimed to be 20-meg anyway, so I guess it was just a little weird. (Attempts to access past the middle cylinder failed.)

    After the never-been-done-before "linux on USB mass storage" article, look for one entitled "Finnish hacker writes his own kernel!", coming soon!

  119. I am not surprised by kgroombr · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing and reading about the tight spacing between the head and the platter. It was said that a speckle of pollen would destroy the hard drive.

    About two years ago, I pulled a computer out of the trash. Powered it up, and the system indicated it had a hard drive problem. While the system was running, I attempted to reseat the cables on the hard drive and found the hard drive was too hot to touch. Figuring the hard drive was toast, I opened it up, and it physically appeared OK. So I left the hard drive open, and reattached it to the system. Powered it up and it started to boot fine. Let it boot up, ran it, watched the heads moving around the platters. Turned it off, put the case back together, and after two years that 20GB hard drive is still solid.

    An extra bonus, the person that threw the computer out left some hot (nude) pictures of his girlfriend (I know 'cause she lives really close to me) in some wild poses. It makes porn on the Internet look tame. Thought about giving the pics a date with the Internet. Think twice before thinking your hard drive can't be read.

  120. Voice coils.. by Myself · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the time in high school that my friend and I had his computer torn apart, I don't remember the reason. After a few boots, we both realized that it was beeping a few seconds after power was applied, despite the PC speaker being unplugged. Turns out, his hard drive did a rapid seek before coming ready, and it made a pretty loud noise in doing so. Had us really puzzled for a minute there!

    I'm told there was also software that would drive the head stepper motor in the Commodore 1541 with varying-width pulses, to play music. I've never tracked down a copy though. (Given the fact that the drive had its own 6502 processor, it could probably be unplugged from the C64 and continue playing.)

    1. Re:Voice coils.. by Shanep · · Score: 1

      I'm told there was also software that would drive the head stepper motor in the Commodore 1541 with varying-width pulses, to play music.

      I remember programs which would play music through old dot matrix pin printers. Alternating the striking and non-striking of paper in a PCM fashion could even render very noisy sampled sound. This type of technique was also used for the PC speakers of the time (which were designed to only play tones of square wave), to play digitized sounds. This technique eventually ended up in games.

      I remember first running a program written by a guy who wanted to prove the technique. It played him singing "Daisy Bell (A Bicycle Built for Two)". A song which was played by HAL in 2001 A Space Odyssey.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  121. Old hack! by Urza9814 · · Score: 0

    That's news? I saw the same thing on hackaday about a year ago, but that guy put a picture of a penquin on it too :-P

  122. Cray 2 flashback.... by epiphyte(3) · · Score: 1

    Seymour was fond of transparent gizmos too. He also used to say that disks were for people that couldn't afford enough memory - maybe this would have changed his mind....

  123. I think that Taco has alzheimer's by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

    This would explain the dupes. I remember reading the original windowed hard drive posting on /. too. Either that, or he smokes crack.

  124. HD window boring... HD speakers are cooler by Mordak_Foo · · Score: 1

    I remember a while back there was a post about this guy who "explored" the sonic capabilities of some old, discarded HDs. They claimed the sound wasn't all that bad. Case windows are soooo yesterday anyway.
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/02/16/143921 1&tid=133
    http://www.afrotechmods.com/cheap/hdspeakers/hdspe akers.htm

  125. You still can't see it working If it's in your PC by Lerc · · Score: 1

    What you need is a portible one. like this

    --
    -- That which does not kill us has made its last mistake.
  126. CD-Rom and Other Lasers by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    The laser on my LG CED8120B is Class I--says so right on the laser safety note. I think that class is "too little power per area to cause eye damage even on direct exposure." IR diode lasers close to the visible might put out enough red to be seen--I swear the inside of my Liteon was bright red with obvious laser speckle when I had this happen, but I'm not going to pull out my DVD drive just to check the laser diode out. Then again, it's probably different from a CD drive, being a DVD writer and all.

    Now my "Aurora" laser pointer here is Class IIIa, which is pretty bad for your eyes on direct or specular reflection. Of course, it also says that is output ranges between 400-800 nm. Getting out my handy dandy diffraction grating (read: compact disc), I don't see much blue or green in that spot. Maybe the output's too low to be seen by the eye, and it's just one of those dumb engineering numbers copied from the spec sheet and pasted onto the tag.

  127. Slashdot: Yesterday's Digg, Today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, don't you people even care that your just ripping stories off of Digg now? It looks pretty pathetic when four or five of your top stories happen to have been on the front page of digg for 24 hours already.

  128. LiteOn by kosibar · · Score: 1

    Maybe we've found out where they got their name from?

  129. Schrodinger's cat by ff1324 · · Score: 1

    I guess installing a window would have solve the dilemma of Schrodinger's cat for us. Did Schrodinger have a hard drive or CD drive? What about his cat? Could you install a window on the cat?

  130. 5 1/2 years late by thetaco82 · · Score: 1

    Yoshi did this on the July 19th, 2000 episode of The Screen Savers. I didn't google it very hard, but I came up with this link.

  131. Hate to be a stickler... by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    (and a buzzkill and shoot down your little attempt at humor) but with a window, it would not be a closed-system (photons being able to enter and leave the container) and would therefore invalidate the whole experiment.

    --
    Karma: NaN
  132. Coral Cache link, for your convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Site looks like it's been slashdotted (giving me a 403), so here's a coralized link to the site that works: Hard Drive Window

  133. Very old news by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    People (OK, mad people) have been doing this for years. I remember someone even fitted little red LEDs inside their HDD.

    Obviously cutting open your hard drive is not a very sensible idea, but you'd think that one of the manufacturers would have started making HDDs with a window by now.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  134. Better put the other pages in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Coral isn't rewriting the links to the other pages, so better post them here:
  135. I would agree for the most part, by blaterza · · Score: 1
    I agree with most of you, what is the big deal. I made a window on my HD back in '02. I thought I was the first to do this, it ran for a long time. Until I broke the Lexan cover. You can check the pics out here: http://groups.msn.com/pcmods/wackedoutmoddonottryt his.msnw/

    I would not recommend any doing this unless you just want to have some fun. I think this was a 20 or 30 GB drive. The only problems I had was the Lexan would crack once the drive got hot. I made my swap file drive for Windows and Adobe (don't do this, it makes for really cool movements but also when it crashes and it will it really messes up the OS). The pics were a little later in the drives life; the drive crashed a few weeks after they were posted, but ran for a few months before that. I waited until I had though it would "work forever". You can try to build a clean room all you want, it hardly ever works out. I used giant plastic bags and a whole lot of water on the floor and around the work area. I also used RTV sealant to make the gasket for the Lexan to seal to the drive. As far as why would anyone want to make a clear window on a drive? Why would anyone want to make a tub float on the water? Why would anyone want to make combustible fluid drive a buggy? Why would any sane person want to fly? It is a part of the humans evolution, small steps do equal miles in the long run. It might not seem important right now, but who knows maybe at some point it is the foundation of a new architecture.

  136. BTW: You're a fucking loser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-)

    HTH

  137. i guess HDD those days were rock solid by archish_007 · · Score: 1

    my new hdd makes funny noise when i carry it arounf and he managed to open it cool@

  138. I hate to be a stickler too... by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    ...but the window isn't going to make a bit of difference.

    In actuality, the idea of of "observation" from a quantum physics perspective is generally misunderstood. Rather than "observe", perhaps "interact" would be a more colloquially accurate term.

    For the waveform to collapse to a single state does not require a conscious entity to literally observe the closed system. Anything which interacts with the system would be considered an observer, whether it be a single x-ray passing through the box or even any kind of gravitational effects from the mass inside (since in theory, given sufficiently sensitive equipment the center of gravitational mass of a cat that's standing up and a cat that's lying dead on the floor are measurably different from outside the box).

    In reality, the box would almost have to exist in a different dimension to be a truly closed system, and even then there remains the possibility of interaction on a quantum level.

    I swear to you, I'm not posting this to be a dick. It's only because you brought it up first, and I think this stuff is fascinating. :-)

    Cheers!

    -Cybrex

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  139. This mod is 6 years old! by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    From overclockers.com in 2002 which links to older article from 1999.

    not to flamebait but maybe they should call it SLASHDOT Where Old news is New news

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  140. I had windows and DOORS on my disks 30 years ago! by aqk · · Score: 1

    As a systems programmer, I used to spend HOURS watching the platters spin, the arm/head assemblies move in and out, and feel that sexy big drive vibrate as the computer slowly generated an operating system from a tape.
        Bonius: The TAPE drives even had windows!

        The IBM 3330 disk drives (and their OEMs) had all of 100 Meg as I recall, and we could even open the window, (while the heads were retracted of course), take out the platters and swap the whole disk assemblies back and forth.

        Now why can't we do this with our current WD, Seagate and Maxtor drives?