Slashdot Mirror


Cameras Online? How The Shysters Work

earlylate writes "How do certain photo and electronics dealers thrive despite widely-circulated warnings by unhappy customers? According to a new investigative website "many apparently separate and competing dealers are actually jointly owned and run" and "go to great lengths to conceal their locations and management." Further, some comparison-shopping sites "are in effect marketing partners with their affiliates," the very dealers they rate. There's a contest based on the suspicious "flood of similar, glowing reviews some dealers receive," as well as links to several sources of information and advice for the careful online shopper."

429 comments

  1. Lots of scams out there... by FyRE666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of people don't realise the the big "price deal search engines" such as Kelkoo and Dealtime also return results based on the amount the retailers they link to have paid for a higher position. You'll often find you can dig up better deals just using Google. However, I know that at least one of the biggest UK online electronics retailers derives the highest percentage of paying click-throughs from Dealtime (that is, people referred by Dealtime, who then go on to actually buy a product). The Dealtime referrals actually result in more sales than people browsing their site to find stuff. So the idea/scam works well...

    1. Re:Lots of scams out there... by op12 · · Score: 1

      And a related problem is these search engines will not remove the listings even if several users complain, because they're getting paid enough not to care about pissing off a few people. Or they will remove the listing for a few weeks to quiet people, and then it's back up again.

    2. Re:Lots of scams out there... by ATeamMrT · · Score: 1
      return results based on the amount the retailers they link to have paid for a higher position.

      We should know IF a review website is giving a review based on compensation. Congress should pass a law requiring these websites to disclose how much they were paid for giving search results.

      One website I use is Eopinions dot com. They are a place where anyone can write a review of a product. When I want advice on how good a product is, I don't want to hear from the manufacturer. I don't want to be lied to, I don't want them puffing their product up.

      This reminds me of something that happened at the local university. The Gap gave FREE clothing to some better looking people, and PAID these people money to wear the clothing and talk it up. They wanted to create buzz for their product, and get people shopping in their stores. So what happens? You get 4 very attractive people to wear your product and tell everyone how much they like the product. Then the store gets flooded with 100 sheep all wanting the same product. One month later, when the contract between the attractive people and the store has expired, the attractive people stop wearing the product. The attractive people NEVER liked the product. They did it for money, it was dishonest.

      If politicians have to disclose where they get money from, I think stores should disclose where they spend advertising. I want to know if I'm getting honest advice from a third party, or if someone is selling me because of a relationship with the company.

    3. Re:Lots of scams out there... by sammy+baby · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      This reminds me of something that happened at the local university. The Gap gave FREE clothing to some better looking people, and PAID these people money to wear the clothing and talk it up...

      There's even a term for this practice. It's called "modeling."

      Seriously, other than the fact that you weren't offered money/clothes, what's your real beef here? That people wear clothes because they think it will confer some level of coolness to them? Surely you can't just be noticing this now?
    4. Re:Lots of scams out there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I recently tried to buy a digital camera (Canon Digital Rebel XT) using Google's Froogle. You can do the search yourself here: http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=canon+digital+ rebel+xt&hl=en&btnG=Search+Froogle&lmode=unknown

      Specifically, I wanted the camera body without the lens. The best prices listed were roughly $460 or so. I actually placed my order at a couple of the sites - the order was accepted and everything looks normal. Then I invariably got an email from the sites asking me to confirm the order by calling them.

      Then the crap begings.

      Apparently this item is just a camera body without anything else in the box. No batteries, no manual, etc. Canon does not even sell the camera this way, so I am not sure what they are claiming to sell.

      Fundamentally they refused to sell me the camera listed at the price advertised. "Surely you want the kit with lens?", "The kit without the lens?", "The extended warranty?", and a "How about the warranty in the US?" (even though the web site claimed it had the US warranty).

      I felt like this was a scene from Monty Python's "Cheese Shop".

      I replied "no" to all of these and asked them to just sell me the camera body as advertised. They basically refused - saying they don't have it on hand - and that it would take 8 to 10 weeks to get one (well after the holidays). Then they essentially cancelled my order and hung up without providing me an opportunity to actually order the camera at the price advertised.

      I believe we have laws in our state (New York) about offering rain checks for advertised items that our out of stock. How come so many of these sleeze bag camera shops - which are also based in New York - are exempt from such rules and regulations? Do Interstate commerce rules trump NY rules?

      Anyway - the whole experience was incredibly annoying. I wound up using http://www.techbargains.com/ to find electronic discount coupons from Dell - which was actually a better final price than any of the other camera shops I tried.

    5. Re:Lots of scams out there... by keraneuology · · Score: 1

      A single law holding the engines financially liable for any losses incurred by a customer steered by their sites after fraud has been reported will cure the problem if not overnight as soon as the first lawsuit is successful.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    6. Re:Lots of scams out there... by keraneuology · · Score: 1

      Some booze company was/is doing that at the clubs and bars: hire some totally hot babe to whisper sweet nothings into the ear of some half-drunk schlunk and get him to buy her a martini with wombat brand vodka or anteater margaritias or whatever it was they were doing.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    7. Re:Lots of scams out there... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      i just bought rebel xt, and i need to say, buy from a reputable dealer.

      i used costco. They have the best refund policy, anywhere, and the best price that i could find.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    8. Re:Lots of scams out there... by dekemoose · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, every time any individual has a slightly ulterior motive they should tattoo it on their forehead so that the sheep know better, is that what you are saying?

      Good luck with that.

    9. Re:Lots of scams out there... by dekemoose · · Score: 1

      Hey, surprise, something sounded too good to be true and was! That's incredible.

      ...searches for more flamebait to spew

    10. Re:Lots of scams out there... by ATeamMrT · · Score: 0
      This reminds me of something that happened at the local university. The Gap gave FREE clothing to some better looking people, and PAID these people money to wear the clothing and talk it up...

      There's even a term for this practice. It's called "modeling."

      Seriously, other than the fact that you weren't offered money/clothes, what's your real beef here? That people wear clothes because they think it will confer some level of coolness to them? Surely you can't just be noticing this now?

      No, it's not modeling. Everyone knows a model was paid to promote a product.

      This was deceitful. It would be no different than if Microsoft gave the smartest guy in the computer science program on campus a laptop with Windows, and paid him to tell everyone how GREAT Microsoft is. Meanwhile, the guy is running linux at home and keeping it a secret. So what happens here? 5 or 10 people who don't know much about computers trust the smart guy as an honest person, and buy Windows based on bad information. 1 month later, when their system is crashing from all the spyware, they ask the smart guy why his system doesn't have any problems. The smart guy shrugs, and walks away, leaving everyone who trusted him screwed.

      I'm not against people being paid to promote a product. But the consumer should know when they are getting information form someone who was paid to promote a product.

      Take the example above. But this time, the smart computer guy tells people "I have a laptop with windows which I like. Microsoft gave me Windows for free so I can tell others about how good their product is". That would be fair and honest. I would know the smart computer guy isn't going to tell me "get linux" because he has an obligation to sell MS.

      The problem I have with companies is when they hide how they are advertising to me. I want to know when I am hearing a selling pitch. I don't want to be tricked.

    11. Re:Lots of scams out there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, well, yes... and such a law will also create a whole new opportunity to abuse legitimate vendors by forcing search engines to blacklist them for fear of punishment under said law.

      You could try to avoid that problem by putting investigative burden on the search engine's operator... which will drive small, legitimate search engine sites under (including, say, university research projects).

      Alternatively, rather than trying to create a new law to quick-fix a problem, we could try intelligent enforcement of fraud laws we already have, combined wiht a campaign of consumer education. Knee-jerk law creation has caused far more problems than it has ever solved.

    12. Re:Lots of scams out there... by DenDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      /* A single law holding the engines financially liable for any losses incurred by a customer steered by their sites after fraud has been reported will cure the problem if not overnight as soon as the first lawsuit is successful. */

      That's an awful idea. Akin IMO to holding the beer companies liable for a drunk driver, or a firearm manufacturer liable for the mis-use of it's product. If, however, you can show that the search engines are in league financially with the offending companies, (as in owned by the same company) then they share some of the blame. But if I own a search engine, and it gets spammed with 5 zillion messages raving about a thief, it's not my responsibilty to ensure the reviews are objective.

      If you want to hold the engines accountable, then after you sue that beer company because of the drunk driver, you should go after ABC for advertising it while knowing that drinking beer and driving can be dangerous. Then let's sue the NFL for having an "official beer of the Super Bowl". Then let's sue the stores that sell the beer. then let's sue everyone who's purchased beer, because they helped to prop up the beer company, thereby allowing the company to sell to the one retard that drives drunk.[/reductio ad absurdum]

      OR... we can just drive the crap companies out of business by educating online consumers. We [the geeks] should be helping people out with this stuff, not trying to shut down search engines that are trying to make a buck.

      --
      A Haiku: my language choices/assembler pascal lisp c/old school programmer
    13. Re:Lots of scams out there... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 1

      This happened to me at WISETRONICS.COM.

      Wanted the kit, camera with the body.

      Next day and called to confirm the order, and lo and behold, it doesn't come with a battery, that's another $80. Oh, and you want the battery CHARGER too? That's about $75. So now his 'deal' is just as expensive as anywhere else for the Rebel XT.

      So--

      I went to Circuit City, to the actual store, made them price match their online price ($899) and walked out of the store with camera, lens, battery, etc, in hand.

      Much better.

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    14. Re:Lots of scams out there... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      This was deceitful. It would be no different than if Microsoft gave the smartest guy in the computer science program on campus a laptop with Windows, and paid him to tell everyone how GREAT Microsoft is. Meanwhile, the guy is running linux at home and keeping it a secret. So what happens here? 5 or 10 people who don't know much about computers trust the smart guy as an honest person, and buy Windows based on bad information. 1 month later, when their system is crashing from all the spyware, they ask the smart guy why his system doesn't have any problems. The smart guy shrugs, and walks away, leaving everyone who trusted him screwed.

      I think this is exactly how marketing works. Get someone people recognize or trust, and have them spread the news about the product. You think supermodels have any idea how the face cream they are marketing works, or even what it is made of? How is that deceitful? If you fall for advertising without looking beyond the glamour and fluff, the only fool is yourself.

      And why does every negative example ALWAYS have to refer to MS? Must be some sort of oath you have to take to be respected on /.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    15. Re:Lots of scams out there... by keraneuology · · Score: 1
      Akin IMO to holding the beer companies liable for a drunk driver, or a firearm manufacturer liable for the mis-use of it's product.

      Incorrect analogy. A better comparison would be a company that continues to sell tickets to a theme park with rides known to be dangerous or a tollbooth that continues to collect tolls for a washed out bridge and waving cars through.

      Want a better example? Let's say you are running an online web phone directory and include a listing for a sex hotline with the instructions "call 415-555-1212 and the second we answer start talking dirty. The most obscene call of the day wins a free session". Let's say the phone number is typo'ed in the book and people are being directed to call 451-555-1212 which is a christian daycare center who is innundated with obscene call after obscene call. Accidents happen. If you are told of the error and you correct it, all is well. If you are told of the error and refuse to address the issue then you should be held responsible.

      Trustingly accept a fraudulently listing on your price comparison site, accidents happen. Knowingly retain a fraudulent listing and you should forfeit all protections and accept full liability.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    16. Re:Lots of scams out there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Trustingly accept a fraudulently listing on your price comparison site, accidents happen. Knowingly retain a fraudulent listing and you should forfeit all protections and accept full liability."

      If you could show that they did knowingly retain a fraudulent listing, I would think that you wouldn't need more laws than we already have to prosecute/sue.

    17. Re:Lots of scams out there... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      If I want advice about something, I ask friends or people I trust. The type of people I have as friends are trustworthy. No problem. Also, they aren't the type to advertise for others, and we're also pretty individualistic about our tastes. No worries here about being a sheep and following popular/pretty people around

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    18. Re:Lots of scams out there... by deep44 · · Score: 1
      The Gap gave FREE clothing to some better looking people, and PAID these people money to wear the clothing and talk it up. [...] The attractive people NEVER liked the product. They did it for money, it was dishonest.
      You've just described an "endorsement". Do you think Michael Jordan just *really* liked wearing Nike shoes all those years? Better yet, do you think he chose Nike based on the quality of their products, or the amount of money they were willing to pay him?

      It happens; as a consumer, if you choose products based only on who else is using them (as opposed to quality & personal opinion), you deserve what you get.
    19. Re:Lots of scams out there... by deep44 · · Score: 1
      .. Microsoft gave the smartest guy ..
      .. how GREAT Microsoft is ..
      .. laptop with Windows ..
      .. buy Windows ..
      .. Microsoft gave me Windows for free ..

      The problem I have with companies is when they hide how they are advertising to me.
      You don't happen to work for Microsoft, do you?
    20. Re:Lots of scams out there... by MstrFool · · Score: 1

      Ya know, in a way that /is/ what they are doing. Oh, they don't give you a free computer, but they do talk your bosses into requiring windows. Then they make all the windows certs look real impressive when they really mean next to nothing. When I worked for Gateway we had a person with an MCSE that had to be shown how to drag and drop a file. She was totally incompetent on computers, yet she moved up to a higher paying job because of that cert. I my self got an MCP because Microsoft told Gateway that we had to have a certain number of people on staff with an MCP. I looked over the intro of the book, ran through the Transcender tests a few times then passes the test with no problem. I am not saying this to brag about my skills, I am saying this to point out that you hardly need to know anything about the product to pass the tests, and then they went and dropped the passing score to 55. Any one out there ever found a non-Microsoft test where a passing score is just over half right? The net result is a lot of poorly trained Microsoft-centric people in the controlling positions of IT. The people that know better are required to spout the company line of Microsoft or they get replaced with some one else that will. Few of the people that hire for IT departments realize that a computer is supposed to run for years with out a crash or reboot, and all they know is that Microsoft tells them they have to have people with certain certs that they have to pay Microsoft to get. And if you wonder why we on /. tend to MS bash a lot, it's because they are such a simple target and put in so much effort in bashing us. They are not a software company, they are a marketing company that happens to sell software. In that light they excel at what they do, but they keep claiming to be an honest software company, and in that they are sadly lacking.

      --
      Question reality.
    21. Re:Lots of scams out there... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Heh, I often give places a hard time about buying store-branded stuff. "Wait -- you want me to *pay* to advertise *your store*? How about you just give me the sweatshirt/hat/whatever, and I promise to wear it once a month?"

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    22. Re:Lots of scams out there... by harrkev · · Score: 1

      OK. Let's assume that you are 100% correct. I wish to report a faudulent site: www.amazon.com. Or, how about www.newegg.com, www.bhphotovideo.com, www.buy.com. The point is that all of these web sites that I have listed are 100% legitimate. But how are YOU supposed to know that. Let's assume that 10 people report problems with a vendor. Are they annoyed customers, or shills for the competition? How do you know? What criteria is needed in order to make this determination.

      Also, no company can achieve 100% satisfaction. Things happen, people get pissed off. B&H Photo is at the upper end of satisfaction, and the Brooklyn camera & electronics stores are at the other end. Where is the dividing line? The point is that the Brooklyn store WILL sell you a camera (if you also buy the $50 tripod, $20 battery, and the $100 extended warranty). Even Best Buy sells a warranty (which some people would argue is a scam). So this is not a black & white issue. Some stores (like Amazon) are white. Nigerian scammers are black. Brooklyn camera stores are more of a dark grey. So, what is the cut-off line, and how much homework should a search engine do before de-listing a company?

      In principle, your ideas are sound, but are quite difficult in a "rubber meets the road" kind of way.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    23. Re:Lots of scams out there... by romka1 · · Score: 1

      Had a simular problem was looking for Konika Minolta A1 or A2 and there were lots of shops based in the state of New York, some had stores hosted by yahoo.com, anyways they offered the cameras at a very good price but when you placed an order they would go through the same bs about ordering a kit to go with the camera and so on...
      Evantually I gave up on the online sites and just bought a camera from a local camera shop.

      --
      Visit my site @ http://www.madtorrent.com
    24. Re:Lots of scams out there... by sammy+baby · · Score: 1
      This was deceitful. It would be no different than if Microsoft gave the smartest guy in the computer science program on campus a laptop with Windows, and paid him to tell everyone how GREAT Microsoft is. Meanwhile, the guy is running linux at home and keeping it a secret. So what happens here? 5 or 10 people who don't know much about computers trust the smart guy as an honest person, and buy Windows based on bad information. 1 month later, when their system is crashing from all the spyware, they ask the smart guy why his system doesn't have any problems. The smart guy shrugs, and walks away, leaving everyone who trusted him screwed.

      Let's just examine what actually happened, compared to your hypothetical situation: Gap Inc. pays good-looking people to wear their clothes and talk them up. They do so. Other people raise eyebrows. "Hey, nice duds," they say. "You like? I got them at the Gap! Hip fashions! I love it!" The walking mannequins are lying through their teeth: they actually hate these clothes, but the people asking them don't know any better, and go to the Gap, spending exorbitant amounts of money for mediocre clothes.

      My question: other than the fact that the people they asked don't like clothes from the Gap, in what manner were the dupes deceived? These people were perfectly capable of going to the Gap, looking at what was on the rack, and saying, "You know, upon reflection, I believe that these garments aren't really 'hip' and 'happening,' as the youth culture of today is wont to say. In fact, I'm afraid that they look like they were stitched together out of remnants from a carpet sale. I believe I'll go purchase my clothes at Old Navy, whose fashions are better representative of my upbeat, individualistic lifestyle!"

      Which is all to say, it's a lot easier for a tech to deceive a non-tech about the relative quality of a technical product than it is for one college kid to deceive another college kid as to what constitutes acceptable clothing. Additionally, people shouldn't get their panties an a twist about clothes.

      (Except for Old Navy. The last time I bought a shirt there, a whole swath of fabric surrounding one of the buttons ripped off within a week. F 'em.)
    25. Re:Lots of scams out there... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Sounds like this may be of interest to you, in case you haven't seen it.

      Check out some of Thomas' later blog entries, especially this one if you want to feel like you got a good experience :-)

    26. Re:Lots of scams out there... by sterlingsteele · · Score: 1

      I think you ought to check your information. I don't think you know what you are talking about. DealTime UK hasn't existed for several months. It's now Shopping.com, which is a very reputable site. It is the number one comparison shopping site in the USA, and it was just purchased by EBAY which is one of the most trusted brands online. I have been shopping on DealTime and Shopping.com for several years and have never had a problem with either service.

    27. Re:Lots of scams out there... by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      These people were perfectly capable of going to the Gap, looking at what was on the rack, and saying, "You know, upon reflection, I believe that these garments aren't really 'hip' and 'happening,' as the youth culture of today is wont to say. In fact, I'm afraid that they look like they were stitched together out of remnants from a carpet sale. I believe I'll go purchase my clothes at Old Navy, whose fashions are better representative of my upbeat, individualistic lifestyle!"

      The Gap and Old Navy are owned by the same company. Not that it really matters--your example could have just as easily gone from The Gap to Limited or something--but it's amusing that the "better representative" store is actually part of the same group.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    28. Re:Lots of scams out there... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      If we want to hold ANYONE accountable, let's first examine "shilling" in general-basically, a corporation paying a person to pretend to be a disinterested consumer of their product, while in reality they are a paid advertisement.

      There is a name for offering money to someone in exchange for lying on your behalf, or accepting the money and telling the lie. It is "fraud".

      Paid advertisements WHICH ARE CLEARLY MARKED AS SUCH are one thing-in that case, we know that the company has paid for that space/person to promote their product, and that the person may have never really used it at all. But paying people to lie and deceive, and accepting money/merchandise in exchange for doing it, is fraudulent. As is pretending to be a regular consumer when in reality you are an interested party (owner/employee of a company writing a good review for that company, owner/employee of another company writing a bad review for a competitor). Let's enforce disclosure, conflict-of-interest, and fraud laws-we don't NEED new laws, the ones that exist will work fine.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  2. It's all the mob! by ahsile · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't mess with them... I tried once, it wasn't pretty. I still have to move every couple months so they don't find my location...

    This post alone will give me away, I need to move again... but I needed to warn you all!

    1. Re:It's all the mob! by llamalicious · · Score: 2, Funny

      There you are you little shit.

      *Hey Dom!! Grab the bat and some tie-wraps, we got that little rat-bastard now!*

    2. Re:It's all the mob! by Sesticulus · · Score: 1

      Now we have you!

    3. Re:It's all the mob! by algodon · · Score: 3, Funny

      and SAX, get a battery and some clamps!

    4. Re:It's all the mob! by llamalicious · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can't believe I laughed at your post.
      I'm such a nerd.

    5. Re:It's all the mob! by ahsile · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm the nerd who felt compelled to make a mob joke... but let's face reality, we all read slashdot. We're all nerds.

    6. Re:It's all the mob! by systemic+chaos · · Score: 1

      Somebody's going to get the CLAMPS!

    7. Re:It's all the mob! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      You are an amateur. You don't even own a comfy chair I bet.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:It's all the mob! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I'm not. I'm a geek.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:It's all the mob! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only nerds are snobbish enough to try and call themselves geeks. QED ;)

      I kid. I kid.

  3. Happens in real life, too. by darkmeridian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once bought a VCR some years ago. I went into one store and asked for a specific model of a VCR. I was quoted a price, then I went to another store. The clerk for the second store, after receiving my request, spoke into a walkie-talkie in his native language and then quoted me the same price. Now, perhaps it was coincidental, but both clerks appeared to be Indian. I didn't buy the VCR from either store.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That sure is some conclusive evidence you have. You couldn't by any chance tell us where Jimmy Hoffa is, as well, could you?

    2. Re:Happens in real life, too. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Learn to haggle. "Oh, that's a shame, I only have $X-reasonable discount". A lot of these places do work together, but they also have absolute authority to offer a discount.

    3. Re:Happens in real life, too. by mekkab · · Score: 1

      As long as you know what you are doing, you can get some awesome deals from the "south asian underground."

      /I assume you're in the NY tri-state area? perhaps near Westchester?
      //just checked your JE, you ARE in NY

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    4. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went into one store and asked for a specific model of a VCR. I was quoted a price, then I went to another store.

      What was wrong with the first price? Or did you just want to jerk people around?

    5. Re:Happens in real life, too. by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      The clerk for the second store, after receiving my request, spoke into a walkie-talkie in his native language and then quoted me the same price. Now, perhaps it was coincidental, but both clerks appeared to be Indian. I didn't buy the VCR from either store.

      Just a little bit racist, no? Just because someone speaks a foreign language, they're immeidately suspect? Isn't it possible that both dealers quoted you MSRP minux 10% or something to that effect? It's not extremely likely, but definitely not out of the realm of probability either.

      Oh, and go use that new VCR to watch Crash while you're at it.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    6. Re:Happens in real life, too. by mekkab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just a little bit racist, no?

      No, really. South asian's got cheap electronics LOCKED DOWN in NY. Perhaps refurbs, perhaps liquidations, but still madd cheap.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    7. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Under one of the end zones in Giants Stadium.

      HTH

    8. Re:Happens in real life, too. by bri2000 · · Score: 1
      That used to happen to me all the time in many of the shops in Tottenham Court Road in London. It also became clear to me that many of the shops must either be owned by the same people or, at least, be affiliated as, on several occassions, I'd spend the morning comparison shopping for a bit of kit in the independant stores, find the cheapest store, ask them for it and have to wait 10 minutes while the salesman sent someone to pick it up from one of the other stores I'd been in. Had to be on your toes as well, there were plenty of times they brought back the model down from the one you were trying to get (and attempting to exchange a water damaged (it appeared) VCR was all sorts of fun... should've wondered why it was half price I guess... )

      Note: A lot of those type of shops have gone now with the redevelopment of TCR in the last 10 years, with their leases being bought out by the chains and big computer seller's. A pity really, while you had to be very careful dealing with them these old electronic shops had everything you could want.

    9. Re:Happens in real life, too. by nacturation · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just a little bit racist, no? Just because someone speaks a foreign language, they're immeidately suspect?

      Why don't you try to comprehend his point rather than knee-jerking off in a racist accusation? The action that is suspect is the fact that the staff, after being requested the price, first spoke on a walkie-talkie in an unintelligable language before delivering the price. This leads one to suspect that perhaps the unintelligable conversation was regarding the price. Even more so when you take into account that the staff members at both stores appeared to be of identical nationality which makes it likely that the unintelligable conversation was between them.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    10. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      What was wrong with the first price?

      It's called "Comparison Shopping". You shop around and compare prices. Sometimes you wind up paying less for the product. Amazing, huh?

      I know, I was surprised with the concept, too. Whoda thunk it?

    11. Re:Happens in real life, too. by MrNougat · · Score: 1, Troll

      Mod me down if you must, but the inference that two 'foreigners' at different stores were in cahoots against the shopper - only evidenced by one's use of a walkie-talkie and a language the shopper didn't understand - smacks of racism. I could be wrong, but that's certainly what it seems like based on what was posted.

      While it's possible that both stores were owned and operated by the same person, there's nothing wrong with this. And there's nothing wrong with a store clerk using a walkie-talkie to get a price check on an item, even if the person he's getting a price check from is at a different store location.

      I do agree that it was much easier in years past for stores that sell high-priced items to fudge pricing. Now that people are able to do their own research online instead of having to trust colleagues, drive around, or make innumerable phone calls, stores are less able to play games like that.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    12. Re:Happens in real life, too. by benzapp · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Its not racist at all. Many cultures of eastern origin consider lying and deception a normal part of dealing with strangers, particularly in business transactions. It is one of the many reasons their cultures are total failures, with recent population growth allowed purely due to technology invented in Europe. It is also one of the reasons such primitive cultures value family connections above all else, those are the only relationships they trust.

      There are specific cultural reasons for this behavior, and anyone who ignores them in furthering the grand egalitarian myth will be taken as a fool.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    13. Re:Happens in real life, too. by bobwoodard · · Score: 1

      This is _very_ true, the closest I can come to explaining it is like this: it is only a lie if they get caught lying (and even then, good luck getting them to admit to a falsehood, it was all just a "misunderstanding"). If you believe the lie, there was no lie told.

    14. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it looks like a duck...and I am not talking about his "racist" comment, either. Your sensitivity button is set a little high. I bet your blinker fluid is low, as well.

    15. Re:Happens in real life, too. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      "racism" to be distinguished from "predjudice".

      They aren't necessarily the same thing.

      Some people will be more than willing to encourage you to draw negative conclusions about their entire ethnic group.

      The one about petty theft not being considered wrong in the old country is my personal favorite.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:Happens in real life, too. by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod me down if you must, but the inference that two 'foreigners' at different stores were in cahoots against the shopper - only evidenced by one's use of a walkie-talkie and a language the shopper didn't understand - smacks of racism. I could be wrong, but that's certainly what it seems like based on what was posted.

      Paranoid, possibly, but not necessarily racist. The question is whether he would have jumped to the same conclusion that he was not dealing with two independent retailers if the clerk at the first store was the same race as himself, and the clerk at the second store was as well, but bore what might have been a family resemblance to the first clerk, and spoke quietly into the walkie-talkie so that he couldn't hear. I suspect that he would have reacted exactly the same way. Not everything has to be about race.

    17. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      References, please. (No, seriously, I'm interested.)

    18. Re:Happens in real life, too. by radish · · Score: 1

      is one of the many reasons their cultures are total failures

      Depends how you define "total failure". Personally I rate art and culture over the Big Mac and SUVs. YMMV.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    19. Re:Happens in real life, too. by radish · · Score: 1

      The action that is suspect is the fact that the staff, after being requested the price, first spoke on a walkie-talkie in an unintelligable language before delivering the price

      You mean like how the droid at BestBuy goes to his little computer to look up a price when I ask about an untagged item? And I think you'll find that the language spoken is perfectly intelligable, if you speak it. It may have been unintelligable to _you_, but there's only one person to blame for that.

      This leads one to suspect that perhaps the unintelligable conversation was regarding the price

      Wow. We're dealing with Sherlock Holmes here. No shit. Someone didn't know the price for something so he asked. Maybe he also asked if it was in stock? You know, trying to be helpful?

      Even more so when you take into account that the staff members at both stores appeared to be of identical nationality which makes it likely that the unintelligable conversation was between them.


      Now that's a jump. Really. Two people speaking the same language, so they must be talking to each other? But so what if they were? Lets go back to BestBuy. I get a price from the droid, but they're out of stock. What does he do? Well if I ask nicely maybe he'll get in touch with other local stores to see if they have any stock. So maybe these two stores were owned by the same company, maybe they were both talking back to a warehouse to get pricing & inventory. Why is that a problem?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    20. Re:Happens in real life, too. by TomRitchford · · Score: 1

      And how exactly do you propose that they tracked you from the time you left one store to the time you entered the next? How exactly did the second salesman know to call the first one?

      Sounds like paranoia or racism to me, too.

    21. Re:Happens in real life, too. by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      how did this racist dribble get modded "insightful"? so who is shining beacon of truth in business? the oil industry? maybe tobacco? perhaps music. jeez, the same item is the same price at different stores that probably bought it for the same price and have to pay similar rent? must be those damn lying asians. nice.

    22. Re:Happens in real life, too. by JML64 · · Score: 1

      My job takes me to several different motel/hotels in the area. The same middle-eastern people run 3 of them. These people come to our country and use monopolistic tactics to run their businesses. On top of that, they get 7 years of virtually no taxes, and when the 7 years are up, they simply transfer ownership of the business into another family members name. I'd bet the farm that those two VCR salesmen were related.

    23. Re:Happens in real life, too. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Their culture is exceedingly ancient,insi rigid in form, more ritual than personal expression. But culture is by definition the collective hopes, dreams, social customs, and ethical codes which a people share in their pursuit of survival.

      Given the immense human suffering that takes place in most of this region of the world, I think it is safe to say that their culture is not merely a failure, but a direct cause of their misery.

      The fact the predecessors that founded their countries once had unique artistic tastes is irrelevant. Most of these people are living in mud huts or shacks made of garbage. Their level of civility is far inferior to that achieved in Rome 2000 years ago, and the average citizen is more akin to a workhorse than an artisan.

      Your false dichotomy demonstrates the lack of depth of your own aesthetic tastes.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    24. Re:Happens in real life, too. by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      you don't really live on a farm, do you? I mean, come-on betting the farm? How do we know your not related to the first guy who was vcr shopping? Maybe your in cahoots with him to give his post a modicrum of credibility; which consquently was lost with the "bet the farm" comment.

    25. Re:Happens in real life, too. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      how did this racist dribble get modded "insightful"?

      I think that primitive ad hominem attacks such as your own are unproductive. Clearly, Eastern countries, with the exception of China and Japan, and to a lessor extent Korea, are dismal failures. I am offering you a much more rational explanation. WHat is yours? Or do you consider a billion people living like animals a success? Or wait, you think they are genetically inferior and thus there is nothing we can do about it?

      so who is shining beacon of truth in business? the oil industry? maybe tobacco?

      I didn't say people in business don't lie. The difference is in many Eastern countries, it is considered normal and is to be expected. It is part of the bargaining process. In western countries, it is considered ethically wrong.

      Since Antiquity, we have in the West upheld truth as the most noble of virtues. We have an entire study dedicated to it (epistemology). It is what allowed the west to transcend a clan based culture, and was one of the major advancements in human history.

      I have offered a philosophical explanation for the collective failure of a people. You falsely believe I offered a biological one. So, if its not philosophical, and its not genetic... What then is the reason these people can't even build roads on par with those built by Rome 2,000 years ago? Why can't they provide simple food and shelter for their people, let alone the opportunity for greater pursuits? Enlighten me, please.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    26. Re:Happens in real life, too. by SmellTheCoffee · · Score: 0, Troll

      It is one of the many reasons their cultures are total failures, with recent population growth allowed purely due to technology invented in Europe.
      Care of explain how exactly is your culture any better??? I believe you are from US and you have the biggest liar at the topmost position and that too mostly because of family connections. How is that for a reality check?

    27. Re:Happens in real life, too. by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      what are you basing your premise on? as far as i know, buddism and hinduism don't promote lying. and about their "failure"; perhaps they just haven't mastered the skills of conquering, abuse, slavery, and genocide that we seem to do so well. just ask any native american, if you can find one. btw, is this also your explanation for africa?

    28. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > References, please. (No, seriously, I'm interested.)

      Try news. Even 2000 year old news. War, murder, genocides, exoduces, more wars and so on. This has been the norm for literally several millennia.

      I am not sure how serious you are if you have not heard any news for the last few thousand years. And yeah, I know this is Slashdot but even so...

    29. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Mr. Sherlock Holmes,

      Please don't post unverified opinions as fact - that's one of the indications of a racist or some other "ist." And also don't use such phrases as primitive cultures and family connections without understanding them - you may have your narrow minded definition that doesn't apply to the world. Greed transcends culture and religion and I got a few western words for you: Enron, Worldcom, Tyco, ...

    30. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Westerners who travel into South Asia and the Middle East are frequently bewildered by the sheer amount of dishonest merchants. This happens despite the warnings from tour guides. And family is no barrier to fraud

      http://www.time.com/time/asia/asia/magazine/1999/9 90719/souls1.html

    31. Re:Happens in real life, too. by tengwar · · Score: 1

      It's still a fun place to shop. I find the staff there far less pushy than most places, and a couple of weeks back I actually had someone knock off five pounds after I'd agreed to buy something.

    32. Re:Happens in real life, too. by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is a teeny little example, but I find it compelling.

      There was a little convenience shop operated in the lobby of a building I worked in a few years ago, operated by a nice older woman who appeared to be from India. The first time I went in, it was with someone who shopped there regularly, and she gave me a certain candy bar for a certain price (none of the merchandise was marked.) Every so often I came in and picked up a few trinkets, and she always gave me that candy bar for that price.

      Then, one morning, I went in and a nice older man (I assumed her husband) was at the register. I grabbed my usual candy bar, and when he rung it up, he did so at an approximately 30% premium. It ticked me off; I said so, and walked out. As I walked out, he shouted after me that he'd give it to me cheaper.

      The thing is, if you're from India, this is how retail is done; regular and known customers get better deals, all prices are negotiable, and in some circles it's considered insulting if you offer a fair price the first time (as it is similarly insulting to request the product at a reasonable price the first time.) Unfortunately, if you're from the US, you except to receive the same price as everyone else in the interest of fairness, and you get insulted if someone jacks with the price (upwards, at least) -- which clashes with the eastern viewpoint on such things.

      I took this lesson to heart, and now when I go to any retail shop run by someone who appears to be from India, I always make a lowball offer on something I want. I never get it for that price, but they always seem surprised that an American is opening the negotiation in that fashion, and it's fun. Once and a while we get to a price that makes me happy, too, and actually buy the thing. Learning to do this was quite liberating.

    33. Re:Happens in real life, too. by damsa · · Score: 1

      Please cite where they don't have to pay taxes for 7 years. Thanks.

    34. Re:Happens in real life, too. by wickedken · · Score: 1

      If they were smart, wouldn't one of them - if they were in fact in cahoots - offer a slightler lower price than the other to induce the customer to perhaps purchase the VCR from one of the retailers?

    35. Re:Happens in real life, too. by CasmirRadon · · Score: 1
      Its not racist at all.

      Good thing too, because without this preface I might have been confused when you said:

      ...It is one of the many reasons their cultures are total failures...

      The arrogance of labelling a culture (any culture) as a failure astounds me. What do you mean "failure"? It is an interesting philisophical stance for you to take, labelling failure and success as absolute concepts. As if failure and success actually existed as empirical fact.

      Aside from that, you cannot back up your claims. You claim that family connections are valued because they are the only relationships that can be trusted. This is a bold claim. Thank God we have arm-chair anthropologists and sociologists like you to make logical leaps like this, without research. I imagine the research to demonstrate this would take a really long time, so this is a great time-saver.

    36. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I didn't say people in business don't lie. The difference is in many Eastern countries, it is considered normal and is to be expected. It is part of the bargaining process. In western countries, it is considered ethically wrong.

      Since Antiquity, we have in the West upheld truth as the most noble of virtues."

      yeah right.

      in the east, a liar is a liar - he might have more money, but still a liar. not someone whom you would marry your daughter to if you had a choice or knows.

      in the west, there are no liars - only people with business justifications. if his business suceeds thanks to the lies, even if everyone knows he is a liar, he will be accepted (or she). He will be married to your daughter, no problems. He will sit at dinners at your table, in a nice suit and tie, and say grace like everyone else. He can become anything in the country, anything.

      that, is the difference. I have enough knowledge of western cultures to say this about them. how many years have you lived in the east?

    37. Re:Happens in real life, too. by keshto · · Score: 1

      Its not racist at all. Many cultures of eastern origin consider lying and deception a normal part of dealing with strangers, particularly in business transactions. It is one of the many reasons their cultures are total failures, with recent population growth allowed purely due to technology invented in Europe. It is also one of the reasons such primitive cultures value family connections above all else, those are the only relationships they trust.

      There are specific cultural reasons for this behavior, and anyone who ignores them in furthering the grand egalitarian myth will be taken as a fool.


      Since the mods rated the parent's drivel as insightful, my reply is certainly going to be modded down as troll. But still, here goes:

      The grandparent made a xenophobic point about VCRs, the parent expanded that to a discourse on lying, primitive cultures. A little-too-ambitious exercise in generalization, but hey- whatever example works for buttressing your point, you use it. Right?

      As far as VCR incident is considered, many of these mom-and-pop stores don't have bar-coded price-tags, they have small stickers with price on them. If the sticker comes off, you've to do a price-check by looking up your records. Isn't it possible- indeed, likely- that the clerk just called somebody inside the store to look up the price? That the two stores colluded on price fixing of the VCR is quite unlikely, for the simple reason that electronic items like VCRs have a lot of sellers with a lot of competition (Best Buy, anyone ?). Price-collusion happens when there are only a few sellers who control the market. And, even if that were the case, do you seriously think the shop-owners would be so dumb as to blatantly discuss prices- won't they just quietly meet once a week and fix the prices?

      As for the parent's tirade over lying, primitive cultures- sir, exactly what is your fucking point? Population growth due to Western Thought? That doesn't even make sense. Still, look here: you'll see that the asian countries (primarily, China and India) have always had a lot higher population than other places. It's not because of Western thought- it's the large tracts of fertile land, stupid! As far as lying and deceit in Eastern cultures, I am not sure if you realize that all the major philosophies/religions of the East (Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism etc.) depict themselves as a "Search for the Truth". Do you seriously think they even approve of lying?!!

      And before the parent returns to make more silly arguments, here's an example how I ould turn the claim around. I could make silly arguments like this: "Western Thought revels in the use of treachery and falsehood as acceptable acts". One of Western's civilization's most cherished stories is the story of Helen of Troy. And in this story, the lying side wins by doing that most unhonorable of war behaviours: stop war to propose friendship, gain the other side's trust, use that trust to gain entrance, and then destroy everything/everybody in sight. Clearly, if this story is so popular, it must indicate that Western Thought is a philosophy of evil, backstabbing bastards, right? As you can see, arguments about the quality of some culture, motivated by your prejudices and based on well-selected examples are rather silly. Please avoid them.

      As to lying and deceit in business, has the parent been living inside a hole for the last few years? Of late, Western business hasn't exactly been a beacon of Truth, Justice, and All That. And no, it is not the fault of "Western Thought". Nor of any influence from lying, primitive "Eastern Cultures". It's just that wads of cash and moral rectitude seem not to go together very well.

    38. Re:Happens in real life, too. by speculatrix · · Score: 1
      It is one of the many reasons their cultures are total failures

      So, corporate greed in the west which is destroying the planet (i.e. not just the local environment) is a mark of success?

      25% (?) of the worlds population using far more of the planets resources than their fare share, is a sign of success?

    39. Re:Happens in real life, too. by ClamIAm · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Many cultures of eastern origin consider lying and deception a normal part of dealing with strangers, particularly in business transactions.

      It's great that those honorable, upstanding Europeans were so great with the Native Americans, then.

    40. Re:Happens in real life, too. by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      If they were smart, wouldn't one of them - if they were in fact in cahoots - offer a slightler lower price than the other to induce the customer to perhaps purchase the VCR from one of the retailers?

      That would encourage the customer to try to start a bidding war by going back to the first retailer, and saying, "So-and-so down the street offered me a lower price, can you beat it?" (this is New York, remember) This way, the customer is more likely to figure, "I guess that's just the best price I'm going to get," and buy it.

    41. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: "if you're from the US, you except to receive the same price as everyone else in the interest of fairness"

      well except for the fact, that in the US you don't expect to receive the same price as everyone else in the interest of fairness. you want the best possible price. for example the airline industry, nobody complains that a counterpart on the same flight got a cheaper price because they did research before buying their ticket.

    42. Re:Happens in real life, too. by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      One and a half billion Americans can't be wrong!

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    43. Re:Happens in real life, too. by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      This is true in many cases. If you find it liberating to do it at Indian retail shops, you should try it other shops. You can haggle at many privately owned small businesses where the person behind the counter is often the owner. At the very least, it seldom hurts to ask.

    44. Re:Happens in real life, too. by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately yes. Don't think for an instant, that many Eastern countries aren't trying to do the same thing.

      Like it or not, the west by in large is seen as successful...corrupt perhaps, but definitely successful.

    45. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may have been unintelligable to _you_, but there's only one person to blame for that.

      Exactly. The person to blame is the person who won't speak fucking ENGLISH in America! What the fuck?! Speak foreign on your own time.

      God damn!

    46. Re:Happens in real life, too. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      The arrogance of labelling a culture (any culture) as a failure astounds me. What do you mean "failure"? It is an interesting philisophical stance for you to take, labelling failure and success as absolute concepts. As if failure and success actually existed as empirical fact

      I really don't see what culture has to do with race. Why don't you enlighten me on that one first.

      As for culture, your pathetic mind which has been manipulated by years of propaganda doesn't know what culture is. You think of language, you think of chinese food, you think of funny outfits and rigid social customs. The most superficial aspects of culture are what you think of. None of that matters, and in a place like India it is highly variable anyhow.

      Culture is a weapon, it is the very fabric of a people united in survival and the pursuit of prosperity. There are of course two measures here. Survival, the most basic, has very clear standards. You either live, or you die. In Eastern countries, survival is hardly guaranteed and most tend to live a shorter lifespan than the average citizen of the Roman Empire 2,000 years ago. In terms of survival, they are failures. I don't need to post evidence for this. Only a fool would claim otherwise and a casual stroll through any major city in India or anywhere in Southeast Asia would prove me right.

      As for prosperity, that is a bit different. And that I don't have time to prove. But since you clearly have no knowledge of the philosophical writings of which I speak, what would it matter anyhow? The notion of the platonic ideal forms which formed the basis of Western Culture still does not yet exist in the east. It is for this reason their people can merely absorb western culture and not create their own.

      I'm not going to educate a fool like you in aesthetics, but suffice it to say it is a cornerstone of any healthy civilization. To understand that further will take much more reading than the last 10,000 posts on slashdot.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    47. Re:Happens in real life, too. by patio11 · · Score: 1

      It was probably about the price... TO HIS OWN MANAGER. Come on, this is a tech site, think this through. He just happened to have a walkie talkie tuned on to a special Indians only frequency? When they have an effective range of, what, a couple hundred *feet* for the consumer models? And The Vast Indian Conspiracy uses a network of walkie talkies to maintain market control over a city? No, he used walkie talkies like every other minimum wage know-nothing in the retail industry uses them: to talk to his boss for a price check. And why bother using English if his boss speaks his language better? I work in a Japanese office and you can be for darned sure that I don't take calls from America and then say "Oh, pardon me, people might get suspicious. My side of the conversation is going to be in Japanese from this point out. Try to keep up."

    48. Re:Happens in real life, too. by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Definitely did not mean to start a whole debate. There was some more background info I omitted. The stores were basically across the street from each other. The area was heavily Southern-Asian (high concentration in the neighborhood), and the stores were both tiny places stuffed to the gills with inventory. If there was anyone else in the store, you could have simply turned and asked. It was that small.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    49. Re:Happens in real life, too. by CasmirRadon · · Score: 1
      First of all, thank you for treating me like a fool, and calling me one too. I'm trying to believe that you are not just a troll, but it gets a little hard when someone who speaks so much of philosophy is so insulting. I may be a Slashdot user, but I am not a computer technician, I am a Sociologist.

      As for culture, your pathetic mind which has been manipulated by years of propaganda doesn't know what culture is.

      Do you see? Do you see why people might think you are a troll?

      Culture is a weapon, it is the very fabric of a people united in survival and the pursuit of prosperity.

      Your use of "prosperity" here is loaded and inaccurate. Culture is not so specific a determinate. Plenty of cultures have no interest in prosperity. Unless you care to define a specialized definition.

      In terms of survival, they are failures. I don't need to post evidence for this. Only a fool would claim otherwise and a casual stroll through any major city in India or anywhere in Southeast Asia would prove me right.

      Once again, calling your opposition fools. But also you are suggesting that the burden of proof should be shifted, even though you are the one making the claim (and the claim that a particular culture is a failure, is a very large claim). Furthermore you are suggesting that we not only use anecdotal evidence to reach very complicated conclusions, but that we must reach the same conclusions that you have.

      But since you clearly have no knowledge of the philosophical writings of which I speak, what would it matter anyhow?

      Because I'm a fool right? Of course in my last post I mostly just suggested that such an absolute approach to complicated concepts such as "failure" and "success" might not be sound. Obviously I know nothing of philosophy.

      It is for this reason their people can merely absorb western culture and not create their own.

      Another huge claim. You claim that others merely absorb western culture, but more importantly you claim to know exactly why this happens. Do you see how this is a lot for you to state without anything to back it up. I am sorry if I don't think "it's obvious!" counts as a citation.

      I'm not going to educate a fool like you in aesthetics, but suffice it to say it is a cornerstone of any healthy civilization.

      Once again I ask, are aesthetics absolute? If they are, are they really the cornerstone? I may not be ignorant of philosophy as you hope. Maybe our teachers had vastly different teaching styles, mine taught me that there are few absolutes, and to always question.

      Oh, and you asked what culture had to do with race. I'll admit here that maybe I misjudged you, what you've written comes off pretty insulting and dismissive. But maybe you are not prejudiced against race at all, in which case I will drop my implied accusation.

    50. Re:Happens in real life, too. by keshto · · Score: 1

      The action that is suspect is the fact that the staff, after being requested the price, first spoke on a walkie-talkie in an unintelligable language before delivering the price. This leads one to suspect that perhaps the unintelligable conversation was regarding the price. Even more so when you take into account that the staff members at both stores appeared to be of identical nationality which makes it likely that the unintelligable conversation was between them.

      Okay, here are two scenarios:

      1. Apu calls Manjula (who's in backroom, catching up on paperwork and mail). The conversation goes like this: [in Hindi] "wifey, what's the price on this Samsung K-6DV VCR- the sticker is missing. And dinner is still at 7pm, right ? Very good". To the listener it sounds like "oo iii K-SeeexDeeeVeee ooo eee verrry goood"

      2. Apu calls Sanjay (who's in the other store). The conversation goes like this: [in Hindi] "Yo dude, what price on the K-6DV should I charge this sucker? And we still on for getting the hooker over tonight, right? Very good". To the listener it sounds like "oo iii K-SeeexDeeeVeee ooo eee verrry goood"

      Which do you think is more likely ?

    51. Re:Happens in real life, too. by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      Excellent observation!

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    52. Re:Happens in real life, too. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      And I think you'll find that the language spoken is perfectly intelligable, if you speak it.

      Well, duh. That was my point, though in reverse.

      As to your other comments, the main point of my reply was to address the racist bit. We agree that there are several explanations possible for the conversation.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    53. Re:Happens in real life, too. by Celeron1point2ghz · · Score: 1

      Very nice! I enjoyed that analogy.

  4. Who You Buy From by mysqlrocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd rather pay a little more and know that I'm buying from someone I can trust. So what if I can save a few bucks if I'm not sure I'm going to get exactly what I paid for? Sure I look for deals but it's a matter of balancing that against buying from someone reputable.

    1. Re:Who You Buy From by BushCheney08 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure I look for deals but it's a matter of balancing that against buying from someone reputable.

      That's why I only shop at Best Buy.

      <trying hard not to burst out laughing>

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    2. Re:Who You Buy From by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      I'd rather pay a little more and know that I'm buying from someone I can trust.

      Agreed. If it isn't a reputable chain (Best Buy, Circuit City, etc.) or well-known online eTailer (Amazon, Overstock, etc.), why buy? I want somebody I can complain to if the thing is broken/wrong/not what I ordered, who isn't going to show up at my house and break my arms for complaining.

      To save a few bucks you're willing to throw caution to the wind? Then buddy, I've got this bridge in New York, see... priced to move... [wink, wink]

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:Who You Buy From by spacefight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the big question remains: How to trust someone online? How to tell if someone is a scumbag or not? The featured website tries to accomplish part of it: They rate only the bad ones. Like a blacklist. After I read some of the practices used, I hope some of those merchants stay on them for a long long time. But: Do you trust the raters? :)

    4. Re:Who You Buy From by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      I do now. But when I was younger I wanted the same things but had much less money. So I took chances. But I also had more time and energy to give a hard time to the unfortunate soul that tried to take advantage of me.

      (Like one time I bought a used equalizer for my car at a bazaar and installed it outside right away to find it didnt work and returned it and had to pitch a bitch to get my doe back)

      I noticed years ago that many websites/stores were part of the same company. When building a computer you need several parts. When searching for them and you see the exact same prices listed on several websites for several different parts, plus shipping is the same it just becomes obvious. Then you look at how the URLs are formed and the style of the sites and you begin to see the common theme. Usually their hunger for profits drives them to even more similarities too. If the price/policy is good so what.

    5. Re:Who You Buy From by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in.

      Speak for yourself there, sport. Some of us believe in all of them.

    6. Re:Who You Buy From by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but the big question remains: How to trust someone online?

      Simple. If you're buying a commodity item like a camera, buy it from an established, well-known online retailer like Amazon, Best Buy, Future Shop (here in Canada). If an item is $50 less at website B than it is at some large well-known retailer there's probably a reason. Caveat emptor.

    7. Re:Who You Buy From by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry to hear about your female deer. i'm surprised that they took it as payment in the first place.

    8. Re:Who You Buy From by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Throwing dogs to get a deer back? I'm sure he also meant 'bizarre' instead of 'bazaar'.

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    9. Re:Who You Buy From by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't risk a whole lot of money on a company that I knew nothing about. If I was spending £500+ on a camera, I'd want someone that a friend had recommended and had some reasonable feedback.

      I've spent small money on unknown retailers online, where spending £20-30 is an acceptable risk (even then, I've made sure that there's a few reasonable links around).

    10. Re:Who You Buy From by InsaneLampshade · · Score: 1

      "I'm sure he also meant 'bizarre' instead of 'bazaar'"


      Bazaar -
      1. A market consisting of a street lined with shops and stalls, especially one in the Middle East.
      2. A shop or a part of a store in which miscellaneous articles are sold.
      3. A fair or sale at which miscellaneous articles are sold, often for charitable purposes.

      Bizarre -
      adj : conspicuously or grossly unconventional or unusual; "restaurants of bizarre design--one like a hat, another like a rabbit"; "famed for his eccentric spelling"; "a freakish combination of styles"; "his off-the-wall antics"; "the outlandish clothes of teenagers"; "outre and affected stage antics" [syn: eccentric, freakish, freaky, flaky, off-the-wall, outlandish, outre]


      Hmm...

    11. Re:Who You Buy From by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooosh!

    12. Re:Who You Buy From by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the big question remains: How to trust someone online? How to tell if someone is a scumbag or not? The featured website tries to accomplish part of it: They rate only the bad ones. Like a blacklist. After I read some of the practices used, I hope some of those merchants stay on them for a long long time. But: Do you trust the raters? :)

      What about retailers who also have a brick and mortar store? So if you had a problem, at least you have an address in which they work out of?

      If you're North American, I would trust Henry's for camera equipment. They offer great service both on their retail site as well as their ebay site.

      However, since they have multiple locations near me, I just usually walk in to their store.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    13. Re:Who You Buy From by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Maybe it depends on the region or varies by store, Best Buy hasn't been that bad for me. The customer service didn't give me crap the few times I've returned things or had an issue. Sometimes their prices aren't that great, which is unfortunate.

    14. Re:Who You Buy From by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I fucking hate one of the stores after my last experience. Remember that iPod battery issue? Well, mine was covered under the four year BestBuy warranty plan. The refused to exchange it saying it was not covered when it explicitly says so on my BB warranty slip. After the manager argued with me, he said it is not a policy that it's void because it's now and Apple issue. Obviously, he was full of shit and KNEW that the returns hurt his regional sales status (according to a friend that works in his store). Fuck him, too bad. No my prob.

      I was one step away from a soon-to-be assult charge. But at last, I managed to keep my cool.

      I found another store in Houston, without question it was returned...and I didn't even need to explain myself. When I need a BB store in Houston, I go to this one now.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    15. Re:Who You Buy From by rc5-ray · · Score: 1

      I was in the market for a Digital Rebel XT and read a few of the magazine ads. They all seem somewhat questionable, and most of them say "call for prices", thereby allowing them to bump up the price whenever possible. I ended up using a couple of coupons from Dell and bought the Rebel XT with lens kit ($999 retail) for $790 shipped. Dell may get some black eyes from time to time, but I had the camera on my front door in 5 days and I didn't have to worry that it was a grey market model.

    16. Re:Who You Buy From by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      "Buddha, Zeus, God! One of you guys do something! Help! Satan! You owe me!"

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    17. Re:Who You Buy From by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      You might want to downgrade Overstock from you Trusted eTailers list.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    18. Re:Who You Buy From by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      I was trying to use familiar companies for illustration, but I can see I hit some nerves. I haven't actually used Overstock in a while; their service has become pretty bad and their selection is now choked with things no one wants.

      My wife ordered me a flat-panel monitor for Christmas. That I'm relating this story indicates that I know about it, because she was suspicious of the package it came it. Sure enough it was not a flat-panel but a flatscreen CRT, which is definitely not what she ordered. She just heard back from their customer support people saying they need more information about the item. What do they need to know? They sent the wrong thing!

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    19. Re:Who You Buy From by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you just call the number on the warranty slip? In most cases, that's what you're encouraged to do anyway. Then you don't have to deal with the store at all.

  5. Fear by GweeDo · · Score: 4, Funny

    They made it so I couldn't order online anymore! Don't make them mad!!!

    1. Re:Fear by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Hell, because of "Them", I'm not even allowed to post on...AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!

  6. Vigilante justice by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Someone should go around and take pictures of all the proprietors and store-fronts of these scammy camera salesman and post them on a website somewhere so the rest of us can be informed....

    If you'd like to volunteer, let me know, I have a great camera I can give you for a low-low price, that would be perfect for the job.

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean something like this?

    2. Re:Vigilante justice by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone should go around and take pictures of all the proprietors and store-fronts of these scammy camera salesman and post them on a website somewhere so the rest of us can be informed....

      I believe they're talking about websites. Maybe people could take screenshots and post those, and we can be informed!

      Seriously, though, there's a practical reason why vigilante justice is discouraged: Every a-hole who's mad that he couldn't get an otherwise reputable and service oriented business to cater to his every whim imagines himself in the same category as the guy who thought he was buying a Digital Rebel XT, but got an old, scratched Billy Idol CD in the mail. Thus you end up with the noise of a lot of ridiculous complaints alongside the real ones, and the last thing you want is to encourage these people to "take action". Just as there are dirty, scumbag shopkeeps, there are dirty, scumbag, sociopath customers.

      Anyways this whole story is a lame spam for some lame website. So they're telling us that there are shady businesses, and that anonymous reviews aren't trustworthy? Egads, what a revelation! Thank you for informing me, 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable website!

    3. Re:Vigilante justice by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 1
      my apologies Senor Serious.

      But the joke didn't really work with websites, because then all you'd need is your Alt+PrintScreen button.. and I hear the scams for getting cheap keyboard buttons haven't quite taken off yet...

      --
      Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    4. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Some fellow slashdotter mentioned this already in another similar story. Anyway, you were looking for this:

      http://donwiss.com/pictures/ManhattanStores/

      http://donwiss.com/pictures/BrooklynStores/

      I suppose you could still add to this since you are so enthusiastic about this.

    5. Re:Vigilante justice by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      If you get taken, report 'em to the Better Business Bureau, regardless of whatever feedback you give somewhere else. BBB may or may not be able to convince a vendor to give you your money back, but it will help someone else along the line.

      As always, skepticism is healthy. If a deal seems impossibly good, that's when the alarms should go off in your head.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    6. Re:Vigilante justice by raider_red · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to do this, but the bastards have had my camera order tied up for three months.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    7. Re:Vigilante justice by se7en11 · · Score: 0
      I think I've seen that site before....hmmm....wait...nevermind it was just myspace.com.

      My bad.

    8. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean something like this?

      And you see pictures of the proprietors where on that web site?

    9. Re:Vigilante justice by robogun · · Score: 1

      That's a great site. I almost bought from one of those "merchants" until I saw the laundromat he was selling his $3,000 hi-def videocams from. I went with B&H instead.

  7. Nooooo, say it ain't so by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Insightful


    You mean to say that I shouldn't spend $100s based on the opinions of anonymous and untrusted (to me) sources.

    I tell you, I'm shocked.

    You'll be telling me next that the editorial in trade newspapers is somehow related to the advertising.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Nooooo, say it ain't so by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know, it's incredible! Next, they'll be telling us that book publishers pay bookstores to prominently feature their books on "recommended" tables! Or that manufacturers pay grocery stores to display their wares at eye level! Shocking, I tell you, shocking!

      Eric
      (I wish my publisher would do that to my own book)

    2. Re:Nooooo, say it ain't so by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but most trade mags or booksellers don't collect money to advertise stuff which is outright fraud. Imagine if Barnes and Noble had a reputation for publishing books which were missing every 3rd page to save on printing costs! In general when doing business with somebody it isn't acceptable to merely take the cash and promote them - especially when you know that fraud is a problem.

      Imagine if the New York Times published classified ads for cocaine dealers - after collecting cash and an assurance that the dealers had a special exemtion from the DEA which they didn't actually provide evidence of. Do you think that the attourney general wouldn't fine them?

      Sure, maybe bookstores promote books that aren't all that good - but that is different than promoting a book that is known to be missing pages, or double-charging customers, etc. There is marketing, and there is fraud. Sometimes the line isn't clear, but these photo outfits are nowhere near the line.

  8. Such scams work... by cytoman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    only because of the fact that there is a sucker born every minute.

    I don't think that the number of scams has really increased or anything...the information deluge from the internet makes it seem like there are more scammers now than before. The fact appears to be that in place of one sucker being swindled, now you have 10 suckers being swindled simultaneously.

    A fool and his money...yada yada yada.

    1. Re:Such scams work... by maxume · · Score: 1
      only because of the fact that there is a sucker born every minute.

      It happens more often than that.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Such scams work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that you are labeling the victims of scam artists as suckers?

      wouldn't it be more logical and fitting that you label the fraudsters as suckers?

      after all, their karma will come back to bite them in the ass.

    3. Re: Such scams work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. ...there is a sucker born every minute.
      2. A fool and his money...

      Alternatively,
      3. "you can't con an honest man."

  9. Some interesting pictures of the storefronts by line-bundle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are some interesting pictures of the storefronts

    Front doors

    1. Re:Some interesting pictures of the storefronts by DrStrange66 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Here are some interesting pictures of the storefronts

      I bought a tv from store 114 (DrPlasma, aka eStore of NY) They have multiple aliases. Biggest mistake of my life. They sent me a very expensive plasma tv by mistake and tried to strong arm me into paying for it. They also made an illegal charge to my credit card. Good thing my credit card was pretty full because it limited what they were able to steal when they maxed it out. I dealt with them for nearly 2 months until they finally gave up when they realized I wasn't going to just roll over on this one. Had I researched them out before I would never have bought anything from them. They have conflicting reviews though. Some say A++++++ some say scam artists. I wonder if they write their own reviews.
    2. Re:Some interesting pictures of the storefronts by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Hats off to the website owner - there's a lot of work there.

    3. Re:Some interesting pictures of the storefronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't you send the product back ? ?

    4. Re:Some interesting pictures of the storefronts by DrStrange66 · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you send the product back ? ?

      Ahh but I did send it back and they claimed the screen was cracked in half when they received it and that they were going to sue me for the cost of the tv. I had photos of it before it left my house though. I made sure that they weren't going to try to pull off something like this.

    5. Re:Some interesting pictures of the storefronts by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      I generally disregard any review that says "A+" or any variation thereof, or that simply strike an alarm instinct in me. There's unfortunately quite a few fake reviews out there =/

    6. Re:Some interesting pictures of the storefronts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is you got a free Plasma TV?

      You do know that in the US if you are sent an item via Mail that you did not request. You can keep it. You don't have to pay for it. It is a federal law.

  10. Always buy local by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When it comes to expensive, and frequently fragile electronics, always buy local. This should be a no brainer. The on-line prices are too good to be true simply because the on-line retailers know they won't have to deal with the customer service part.

    --
    Just because you can, does not mean you should.
    1. Re:Always buy local by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      When it comes to expensive, and frequently fragile electronics, always buy local. This should be a no brainer. The on-line prices are too good to be true simply because the on-line retailers know they won't have to deal with the customer service part.

      I purchased a Digital Rebel XT online (from a guy who sold new goods through Ebay auctions no less), saving about $350 over what it was going for (and is still going for) in the store. I did all of my own research (I've found most local shops to be disinterested, uninformed space fillers personally. Obviously there are exceptions, but it seems the norm goes quite contrary to the "informed, personal touch" that is paraded about as the reason for patronizing the small local shops), and if I do have a problem with the camera my only recourse is mailing it to Canon, so again the local shop is irrelevant. Seems like a win win to me.

    2. Re:Always buy local by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 1
      The small corner store has always been better than the big box stores when it comes to the small electronics in my area. The Twin Cities is home to big box specialty electronics stores and discount departmental stores, neither rival the service I have had from the small specialized service. Even for computer parts and service the local store has alway been my final destination.

      Admittedly I look at the big stores for some information before hand, mainly price comparison and just what the publicity/hype is like, then I just waltz over to the small shop (which unfotunately is a bit of drive for me these days so actually more of a line dance than a waltz) and ask what they think of a model or two, compile data, and purchase.

      I've had a few problems, but I've always been able to have them solved by bringing the merchandise back, and talking with the sales associate, without the hassle of packaging it back up.

      Even after advice has been given not to, I've known be that still go for the cheaper deal and find it really wasn't worth the money they saved after all the hassle.

      --
      Just because you can, does not mean you should.
    3. Re:Always buy local by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

      "Always" is a little to solid of a statement. I think it is perfectly safe to buy from major online retailers such as Amazon or newegg. At least from the point of view that you will not be scammed out of a bunch of money.

      There is a case to be made for local customer service instead of shipping something back if it doesn't work though. It would suck to have to ship back your new plasma TV if you buy from a place that expects you to cover the cost of shipping. This particular topic is cameras though. I think cameras are pretty safe to buy from a major retailer online. If your other option is Circuit City or Best Buy then even from them you can order online and pick up at a store, sometimes they even give a discount if you do that.

    4. Re:Always buy local by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I was shopping for my EOS 20D, I purposely visited a couple of local camera stores before ordering from B&H. I was shocked by the performance of the local stores! One basically refused to show me a 20D, and tried to insist that I'd be happier with a Rebel XT. The people in the other store were quite insulting, and also tried to discourage me from getting a 20D, purely on the basis of my not being a professional photographer -- there was enough of the little sneer in the guy's voice, worthy of a cartoon character. I tried to stick around for a while, but even though there were no other customers, I had an extremely hard time getting anyone to talk to me. These weren't high-school kids in a storefront, mind you.

      So I decided I was on a wild goose chase, ordered my camera and other gear from B&H and never looked back. I had about $3000 to spend on camera gear, and all I needed from the local store was basic respect. Anyway, B&H filled my order faster than either of the local stores would have done. And I'm quite happy with the camera, no regrets at all. And I haven't been to any locally owned camera stores since (!!)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:Always buy local by lgbarker · · Score: 1

      In small towns several hundred miles from urban centers it's often difficult to find stores that stock what you want and, when you do, the prices are often high because of the lack of competition. Online shopping can be very useful. That said, if you do find the small shop with the guy that knowns his stuff and is into customer service, by all means pay the extra (which he deserves) and go local.

    6. Re:Always buy local by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      The people in the other store were quite insulting, and also tried to discourage me from getting a 20D, purely on the basis of my not being a professional photographer

      It's those salespeople that I would trust. Why? Because they are discouraging you from buying something that would net them the most profit, which means they are looking out for you. They want to ensure that you get the camera that most benefits you in terms of utilization. Having too many features can be a negative as well.

      It would be similar to an 80 year old grandma wanting to buy a Ferrari Enzo for weekend grocery shopping. She could, but the salesperson would serious question why.

      However, that said, if they politely told you the disadvantages, and couldn't convince you otherwise, they should promptly switch modes to explaining all the pros about your choice and ring you up without further questions.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    7. Re:Always buy local by Boogaroo · · Score: 1
      The people in the other store were quite insulting, and also tried to discourage me from getting a 20D, purely on the basis of my not being a professional photographer -- there was enough of the little sneer in the guy's voice, worthy of a cartoon character. I tried to stick around for a while, but even though there were no other customers, I had an extremely hard time getting anyone to talk to me. These weren't high-school kids in a storefront, mind you.

      Wow, this is EXACTLY the same treatment I got when I went into our local camera shop a few years ago. Only two guys in the store, obviously one was a managing partner or owner of the place and the other wasn't a customer. Couldn't be bothered to talk to me even about buying a high speed CF card.

      Even though I was looking to spend about a grand, I left. Went to Best Buy down the street and spent my money. I felt like the place was a front for the mob or something where they don't need sales because the store's not really there for that.

      Small stores are only as good as the people running them. It's just that it's harder for them to run a dozen storefronts IRL than it is online(not that it doesn't happen as others here have mentioned.)

    8. Re:Always buy local by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Because they are discouraging you from buying something that would net them the most profit, which means they are looking out for you."

      One of them was trying to sell me a prior-year product rather than deal with having to order something new. I'm sure they would have made much more profit on a clearance item with some accessories, than having to special order something else, which of course, took away their one big benefit over mail order -- the ability to put the product in my hand as I walk in the door...

      If you've ever operated a Canon "D" model side-by-side with a "Rebel" you'd probably quickly see why you'd want the "D".

      "Having too many features can be a negative as well."

      There's not a feature that I haven't put to use. I'm not sure where this idea is coming from, but it's a dangerous assumption.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    9. Re:Always buy local by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "It would be similar to an 80 year old grandma wanting to buy a Ferrari Enzo for weekend grocery shopping."

      I think I should be insulted by what you're trying to imply here.

      I don't come across as feeble minded or as unable to appreciate or exploit the benefits of a better-engineered tool, do I?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:Always buy local by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      I deal with B&H too, and I like them, but I very seldom get anything other than accessories there. Why? Because if I'm about to drop $1500 or more on a camera body or lens I really want someone that is able to answer questions.

      Before you get your hackles raised, understand that I had pretty much the same experience as you did. I went to a local camera shop to buy a specific camera body and wasn't terribly interested to hear anything other than 'cash or credit?'. I had spent a couple of months researching different models and was absolutely clear on my needs. When I got there, tho, the salesman wouldn't sell me the $3500 camera until I tried other body/lens combinations. I was annoyed 'cause I was absolutely sure that I knew what I wanted and didn't want to spend any more time on it. But he was persistent and asked reasonable questions, so I went along with it. The short of it is I ended buying something at about half the price that was much closer to my actual needs. Yes, I probably paid more than I would have from one of the box stores, but the extra service was worth it - that's why I keep going back.

      Now, I'm not questioning that you have knowledge of what your needs are and have a similar knowledge of whats available. I'm not questioning anything, really. I had a completely different experience than you did.

      You may want to consider giving your local dealer another shot. You may find that they had a good reason to ask the questions that they asked...

    11. Re:Always buy local by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      It's not that. The salesperson likely had no idea that you not being a professional meant that you couldn't be a serious amateur as opposed to just a point and shooter photographer.

      The chances of a regular point and shoot person using the 20D to its fullest is rare compared to a professional, which is why the salesperson wasn't trying to upsell you. The fact that the salesperson tried to sell you an older model wasn't apparent till after.

      My reasoning is, as long as they justify their side of the sales pitch without being pushy, I'm ok with that.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    12. Re:Always buy local by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      If you've ever operated a Canon "D" model side-by-side with a "Rebel" you'd probably quickly see why you'd want the "D".

      "Having too many features can be a negative as well."

      There's not a feature that I haven't put to use. I'm not sure where this idea is coming from, but it's a dangerous assumption.


      I wasn't necessarily referring that you may not be able to use all those features, but given the generalized context of either being a pro or not being a pro does leave a person to assume that those who are not pro are statistically not as likely to be able to use all the features available, and would likely be confused by them.

      It's a bit extreme but, a person who knows only point and shoots given a 20D. They are not going to take better photos, and likely would take worse ones.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    13. Re:Always buy local by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I like to support local retailers as much as possible. And you can always reach out and touch someone - literally - if you think you're getting screwed. And always pay with a credit card, as they can actually take your money back from the retailer.

      For example, I buy all electronics and appliances at Abt, a "local superstore" in the Chicago area. Great customer service, and prices are at most 5% higer than the big discount chains. Best Buy, Circuit City, and the rest can go pound sand.

      P.S.: I do not work for Abt, or have any financial or emotional interest in Abt's success.

  11. The unfortunate side effect is by Saint37 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The unfortunate side effect is that shoppers will be less likely to go to mom and pop online retailers and will stick to the conglomerates. This makes is clear that it is in the best interest of honest online retailers and all those who sell services to them that they need to make a concerted effort to combat online fraud.

    http://stockmarketgarden.com/

    1. Re:The unfortunate side effect is by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      The stores could do more to combat online fraud, but the manufacturers, particularly their marketing organizations, could do *much* more. For the resellers that get so many reports of the fraudulent unbundling of lenses, batteries, power supplies, manuals, and so on, Canon and Nikon could order them to stop using their trademarks. Why don't the manufacturers get involved where they should?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:The unfortunate side effect is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do people hjave this heartfelt love for mom and pop stores...

      i swear, if my parents owned a store i wouldnt shop there.

  12. The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Never buy your electronics from front stores in the New York City area.

    I have heard nothing but bad news about these New York City stores using bait and switch tactics and selling refurbished goods as new. You are better off using Froogle.com or cnet.com and then doing a little reading of the reviews about the sites that came back with the least expensive results.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  13. What are you, by 2names · · Score: 5, Funny
    the British Mob?

    Henchman, "I say, that scoundrel has surfaced in the United States. Shall we whack him?"

    Don Worcestershire, "Quite."

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:What are you, by Pope · · Score: 0

      "Do you want me to whack somebody? Or off somebody? Or whack off somebody? Cuz I'm married, you know." - Peter Griffin.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:What are you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, it was:

      What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married.

  14. Rule of thumb... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I tend to pick a reputable retailer I've already done trade with, and if the price is more than say 10% different I just assume it's a scam and ignore it unless I know someone else personally who's traded with them. Even if the difference is less than 10% I still prefer to buy from companies I or my friends have dealt with. I may miss some good bargains that way, but I've never been scammed...

    1. Re:Rule of thumb... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I still prefer to buy from companies I or my friends have
      > dealt with.

      Of course, if you had followed that strictly 100% of the time, you'd never have bought from anyone. For any given company that you do business with, there had to be a first time.

      My preferred practice is to only buy inexpensive items the first times I do business with any particular outfit. Once I've developed a feel for the quality of their service, I'm more likely to use them as a source for more significant purchases. For instance, the first time I bought from newegg it was just some little thing, an ethernet cable I think; I'd read good things about them on slashdot enough times to take the risk on a small (and easy-to-get-right) order like that. Eventually I got to the point where I trusted them enough to order a number of components for my current computer system (motherboard, CPU, RAM, graphics card, fans, ...) all at one go. I wouldn't have had the confidence to place that kind of order if I hadn't ordered smaller amounts of stuff from them a number of times previously, with good results.

      Before newegg I used to buy from TCWO, before they went out of business. They were recommended to me by someone local, whom I had spoken with in person on several occasions. Even then, the first thing I bought from them was a $10 network card IIRC.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:Rule of thumb... by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      > I still prefer to buy from companies I or my friends have
      > dealt with.

      Of course, if you had followed that strictly 100% of the time, you'd never have bought from anyone. For any given company that you do business with, there had to be a first time.


      (a) He said "I prefer to by from" not "I only buy from".
      (b) He never said that his friends won't buy from a company without similar prior knowledge.

  15. Amusing Project by VaticDart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Photos of the addresses of various online camera retailers. Funny stuff: http://donwiss.com/pictures/BrooklynStores/

    Not so funny, I'm sure, if you fall for one of their tricks. Just buy for the good ones, seriously, B&H, Adorama, etc... (although I know tons of people have horror stories about both of those, and any other reputable camera dealer).

  16. It's true by fak3r · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had this about 2 years ago, ordered a camera from a place in NYC for a great price, they called to 'confirm the order' and tried to sell me extra batteries, and other stuff...telling me that the stock battery won't last long enough. I said no, they said OK, they never shipped, when I called I got the same runaround, also, not to be racist but I could tell they were arab, but they'd tell me their names were 'Steve' or 'Brad'. I ended up getting yelled at after I called again, and cancelled my order. I contacted my CC card and made sure they didn't/couldn't chage me...but it gave me a bad feeling for ordering online from smaller places. It reminds me of the 419 scams since all the websites look professional - but share similar graphics, you can tell it's a front. Wish I remembered the name of the company, but I'm sure they've swapped names by now. I just went and paid 50$ more thru amazon, and had the new cam in two days.

    1. Re:It's true by op12 · · Score: 1

      A similar story which ended up becoming digg.com's highest dugg story of the year: http://digg.com/deals/Abusive_New_York_Camera_Stor e_Threatens_Blogger

    2. Re:It's true by Oink · · Score: 1

      Not racist, huh? I'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between any middle eastern accents, yet you seem to be an expert.

      --
      ----------------- Oink. Moo. rarr! -----------------
    3. Re:It's true by fak3r · · Score: 1

      Nice, thanks for that, here are some reviews of the site in question, sounds EXACTLY what I experienced:

      http://www.resellerratings.com/seller8613.html

    4. Re:It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not racist, huh? I'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between any middle eastern accents, yet you seem to be an expert.

      Lesson of the day: do not imagine that everyone
      shares your shortcomings.

  17. Wow... by Schezar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I heard the voicemail one of these scumbags left for someone not too long ago. I don't know about others, but I would have had the police online to file charges... These people are scary.

    Luckily, they're not the most intelligent people, as the voicemail seems to show. Calling someone a "bitch" repeatedly and threatening to kill them via an easily traced means is just asking for legal trouble. They don't know how to deal with the actual bad publicity they're starting to get. (Ratings sites are not actual bad publicity, since hardly anyone uses them, and there are many different ones).

    I have a feeling this sort of scam will disappear in due time. It's getting harder and harder to hide from geeks with net connections and blogs, and bad word of mouth, unlike bad "reviews," is killer for a business. Just think of how many techies you know who refuse to buy a particular brand of hard drive simply for hearing about a friend's bad experience once.

    Oh, the rest is a total shameless plug, but we did a bit about this on GeekNights last Thursday.

    --
    GeekNights!
    Late Night Radio for Geeks!
    1. Re:Wow... by Malc · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      1) Don't over estimate the influence of geeks. They're really an insignificant proportion of the population, even with their supposed influence of others around them.

      2) If we listened to every geek's complaint about certain brands of hard drive, we wouldn't buy any. Every brand has had a problem at some point in time. Which just goes to reinforce what I said for 1).

    2. Re:Wow... by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a feeling this sort of scam will disappear in due time.

      You're new to this life, aren't you? The birth rate in the sucker demographics category is way too high for these scams to disappear anywhere within the forseable future.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a feeling this sort of scam will disappear in due time.

      First rule of finding a mark is something along the lines of "find someone who doesn't believe they can be fooled".

      IOW, don't think you can outwit the scammers. They're just as smart and crafty as you are.

  18. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by AnyLoveIsGoodLove · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Use common sense. here's what I tell everyone that asks.

    1) only buy from reputable sites. this has been going on since computer shopper days. its even more true today.

    2) I only use my American Express (AMEX). I can't tell you how many times AMEX has helped with fraudulent charges, merchants that don't deliver etc. AMEX is expensive and a pain in the ass for mechants to sign up. If they are not willing to do that, than I won't buy. I will pay a slight premium for sights that take AMEX. It's worth it.

    If I'd done both these when I first got online in the 90s I would have saved myself a lot of grief.

    --
    "It's technical in a psychometric kind a way" -- C. Parish
  19. PriceWatch and ResellerRatings by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:PriceWatch and ResellerRatings by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

      They're not what they used to be, it's not their fault though. Pricewatch has gotten to be a bit of a pain to sift through their search results. There are just too many misleading listings on there now. I mean there are listings that are actually for some crappy product, but in their description they list the product you actually want as items they also sell. You know, I don't care if they also sell the item I want if it's not the lowest price and especially if I've never heard of them.

      With any site like resellerratings how do you know that these people are actually customers? It is quite helpful though as there are obvious ones that are bad. If you're buying it can't hurt to look there but it's still not a solid guarantee.

    2. Re:PriceWatch and ResellerRatings by pigwiggle · · Score: 1

      "With any site like resellerratings how do you know that these people are actually customers?"

      Simple; look for consistency. If a site has some very glowing reviews and some very shitty reviews the scamming site is stacking it. It's fairly obvious if you sit down and read through the reviews.

      --
      46 & 2
    3. Re:PriceWatch and ResellerRatings by kindbud · · Score: 1

      I unwittingly bought a grey-market Viewsonic VX900 LCD a few years ago from a supposedly reputable dealer I found on Pricewatch. It needed repairs after the warranty expired, which I had no problem paying for. Problem is, Viewsonic has the serial number on their list of stolen merchandise, and promised me they would keep the monitor if I sent it in for repairs, unless I could produce a purchase invoice. I couldn't. It was two years old and out of warranty and I no longer had the invoice, and can't even remember the fly-by-night reseller's name. Now I have a repairable monitor which I can't get repaired. Fortunately I found a online source for the inverter card part it needed, and was able to repair it myself.

      I don't buy from the cheapest dealer on Pricewatch anymore. I don't buy from any dealer on Pricewatch any more. I just go to Newegg. Now I have no problem remembering where I bought something or producing invoices for past purchases. Newegg keeps it all there for me on my online account.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  20. Nothing New by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of those have been around for a long time. and the places with the glowing reviews always feel a bit suspicious when you dig deeper on them.

    The fun part is that it highlights something that most people ignore. They will not think twice buying from someon on ebay with a 1000+ rating yet it is really simple to BUY rating points. (hint: search ebay for cupons) If you spend lots of money on something online and the price is too good to be true, be ready to lose your cash.

    BTW: if it's less than $1000.00 you are pretty much hosed. I lost $500.00 to a scammer auto parts dealer on the east coast (read my blog for the name and location) and after getting my lawyer poised and finding out how much to bring the small claims suit against them It was much cheaper to simply drop it as it would have cost me $1500.00 to sue him... These scammers know this and that is why they rarely venture over that $1000.00 line.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Nothing New by Zak3056 · · Score: 2, Informative

      BTW: if it's less than $1000.00 you are pretty much hosed. I lost $500.00 to a scammer auto parts dealer on the east coast (read my blog for the name and location) and after getting my lawyer poised and finding out how much to bring the small claims suit against them It was much cheaper to simply drop it as it would have cost me $1500.00 to sue him... These scammers know this and that is why they rarely venture over that $1000.00 line.

      Most state filing fees are under $100, and in some states you can even recover the fee if you win the case. One doesn't normally bring a lawyer to small claims court--that is why it would have cost you $1500 to recover $1000.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    2. Re:Nothing New by rhakka · · Score: 1

      In what state can you not recover lawyer's fees for suing someone against wrongful misconduct?

      I'm suing an ex-landlord right now for a withheld security deposit and rest assured, she's paying for my lawyer. My lawyer is charging me, but the understanding is I am not paying until it's settled.

      IA most definitely NAL, but it seems quite unreasonable that if someone screws you and you sue them that they should not pay your court costs and lawyers fees. what am I missing?

    3. Re:Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The high probability that the scammer store will evaporate as soon as the court summons arrives, then start doing business somewhere else under a different name the next day.

    4. Re:Nothing New by larien · · Score: 1
      In the UK we have small claims court; you can file a claim against a company or individual for "small" amounts (£5,000 in England and Wales, £750 in Scotland. Yes, Scotland sucks *sigh*).

      The claimant fills in a form, submits it to the court, both sides present evidence in a hearing, the court makes a ruling, job closed. There's a relatively small fee (certainly less than a Solicitor would cost) and it's relatively simple.

    5. Re:Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet it is really simple to BUY rating points. (hint: search ebay for cupons)

      I tried, no luck. What's the cup supposed be placed on?

    6. Re:Nothing New by Atario · · Score: 1

      In some (most?) US states, you are actually not allowed to have a lawyer in small claims -- that's kind of the whole point.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    7. Re:Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup $100.00 filing fees. $600.00 hotel fees for 3 rooms to house me and witnesses that I would have to bring, Oh and airfaire for all those people as well, lawyer was the cheap part.

      when it's in your state or within 200 miles it's easy to do it cheaply, when it's much farther it's damn expensive and these onlone scammers bank on that added expense for you to try and get to them.

      at an absolute minimum, I would have to bring myself only, hotel room, 3 days off from work and drive the nearly 1000 miles. it still wound have been more than the $500.00 I lost to the thief, this would have eliminated me bringing witnesses that saw what was shipped and how things were handled and packaged.

      It is very different in state. and if it's outside the country, good luck on any amount.

    8. Re:Nothing New by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      page of my blog with the incident details

      It costs money to get multiple people way across the country to the court. I cant spand that kind of cash to try and recover less.

      Transporting people, hotel rooms, Lawyer costs $29.00 as I have legal insurance and only have to cover a co-pay.

      most of the costs are incidentals that the court will not give you in a settlement.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  21. Just use Amazon or NewEgg by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Digital cameras currently have a very competitive market. Every site has the same models for within a few bucks of each other, pretty close to at-cost, and make it up on supplies (batteries, chargers, SD/XD/sticks/whatever storage medium, docks, printers, straps, cases, and of course the holy grail of ripoffs, the "extended warranty").

    When you see a site advertising a given model for $100 to $250 less than everyone else, well, do you really think they plan to take a loss on the camera itself? And even if they did take a small loss (such as at-cost with free shipping), they sure as hell won't sell for less than they can ever dream of making back even if you bought every overpriced accessory they offer.


    Just save yourself the trouble and use a reputable dealer like Amazon or NewEgg for any electronics. They usually have close to the lowest price, and factoring in the BS as part of the cost, they almost always win without even a second thought.

    1. Re:Just use Amazon or NewEgg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also a tip, when you buy from amazon, you'll have better luck getting your stuff on time and good condition if the item ships directly from amazon.com and not one of their storefronts.

    2. Re:Just use Amazon or NewEgg by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I agree. I've been looking at buying a digital video camera here in Norway, and going to my favorite hardware price comparison site, the big shops are all lined up within a 1% band. You have some outliers that are maybe a 2-3% cheaper which I know skimp on stock (basicly order directly from distributor on demand), no unserious ones (they get delisted). You also have the speciality shops which overcharge you (maybe a whooping 10%), but that's beyond the point. The point is, there are no "great deals". There's not even any blatant rip-offs. If you want accessories though, check the total. How much mark-up they put on these varies a lot from site to site. This is nothing like the US though. I've looked at that and compared prices and gone "WTF? How can they sell so cheap?" Then I check out serious shops and the prices are normal. I can only conclude that you fall a lot easier for scams :p

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Just use Amazon or NewEgg by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1
      use a reputable dealer like Amazon or NewEgg for any electronics.

      Also, since this article is about cameras: B&H Photo http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ is well respected. Not the bottom barrel cheapest, but reputable and I've never had a problem with them.

      NewEgg http://www.newegg.com/ is great, although they've recently defaulted to UPS (oops) shipping, and FedEx now costs extra.
      Amazon http://www.amazon.com/ is okay, but make sure you're actually buying from Amazon directly, and not one of the scammy "partner stores" which link off of the Amazon page.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    4. Re:Just use Amazon or NewEgg by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      I'll second the B&H recommendation. The problem with Newegg (for cameras) is that their selection of cameras, lenses, and accessories pales in comparison to real camera stores. Not only that, but the cameras that I did check were more expensive at Newegg than B&H.

  22. A good place to check by davidmcw · · Score: 1

    I always check http://resellerratings.com/ for some kind of backup. I did buy a camera from 'bait & switch' mob a few years ago, I got it, but it wasn't pleasant. My last online camera purchase was from 'Beach Camera', no problems at all.

    --
    Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
  23. PriceRitePhoto = Bad / BestBuy = Nice ? by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 3, Funny

    To think that in light of this, BestBuy stores seem like a nice place to shop!

      I'd never trust a store who couldn't spell "right" correctly anyway. All you Grammar Nazis were right.

    1. Re:PriceRitePhoto = Bad / BestBuy = Nice ? by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      You have something against Rite-Aid?

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    2. Re:PriceRitePhoto = Bad / BestBuy = Nice ? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      " I'd never trust a store who couldn't spell "right" correctly anyway. All you Grammar Nazis were right. "

      In this case, that would be the Spelling Nazis, not the Grammar Nazis.

      /Vocabulary Nazi at work

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:PriceRitePhoto = Bad / BestBuy = Nice ? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      PriceRitePhoto

      You're thinking of "right" as in "correct". Instead, think of "rite" as in "ritual ceremony", as in the formal act of contacting your Attorney General and humbly filing a Writ Of Smiting. It makes a lot more sense that way.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  24. Not Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider that some of the anit-virus look the other way when considering various key loggers.

  25. If it's too good to be true... by pryonic · · Score: 1

    ...it always is. It's a good rule to live by and the same applies offline as much as it does online. I'd rather buy from a trustworthy online store or shop such as Amazon than save a few pounds. The cheapeast is rarely the best, hence why I will never shop with Ebuyer in the UK again. I'd rather pay for customer service I know I can trust than just be fobbed off all the time and ultimately end up out of pocket.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  26. Slashdotted... heres some info from the site by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Several friends of ours have recently had unsatisfactory buying experiences.

    They all researched the cameras they wanted, and they thought they had adequately investigated the dealers. They saw the full-page ads in major photo magazines, the professionally-designed websites, the high dealer ratings on prominent search-sites. They saw all the trappings of the modern online secure shopping site. They trusted that their credit card companies, the respected magazines, and even the states which are home to the merchants, would help ensure a good transaction. And, of course, the prices were hard to resist. Why were our friends ultimately disappointed?

    We took a look at some of the factors and some of the businesses involved, and we offer the information we've found to all who are considering purchasing cameras, video equipment and electronics from the comfort of their living rooms and offices.

    This website is a partial scorecard. We hope it will help readers understand who some of the better-known dealers are, what's behind the ads and websites, and how to find further information.

    We believe that open information benefits both consumers and dealers. We think the whole photographic industry -- hobbyists, professionals, dealers and manufacturers -- is healthier when consumers have clear idea of how to research a transaction and whom they will be dealing with.

    We've tried to make these pages accurate. All the information included is from public sources. If you know of any errors, please inform us and we will correct them at once. If you have further information you think we should be aware of, contact us. (Please -- no rumors or speculation; only confirmable facts.)

    Our contact details are here.

    WELL KNOWN DEALERS

    We have examined some of the online dealers who specialize in cameras and electronics, looking behind the ads and websites to find out who they are and how they do business. We chose some of the most visible companies -- the ones with heavy national advertising and prominent ranking on internet search engines. Many of them have sprung up in the last few years, while some have been around online and in traditional stores for decades.

    Judging from customer surveys, newsgroup discussions and published articles, some of them are held in high regard while others are despised.

    There were some surprises. The biggest one is that many apparently separate and competing dealers are actually jointly owned and run. This is no secret to followers of the many online photography and video forums, but we believe the intertwining is unsuspected by most consumers. On this site we've grouped many of the dealers into "families" to clarify their identities. They form a truly tangled web, with many overlapping corporate connections, addresses and telephones.

    Another surprise was that some dealers act mainly as brokers, with little or no inventory of their own and no "real stores." In our opinion this should not disqualify a business from consideration, but it does contribute to frequent misunderstandings about what is "in stock".

    The biggest obstacle to any research is that some dealers go to great lengths to conceal their locations and management. Sadly, this disguising seems to be the norm for many newer, web-only merchants.

    We believe that open information benefits both consumers and dealers.

    We have included the names of individuals where we could find them, so that consumers know whom to contact with compliments or questions or complaints about a specific transaction.

    We believe that a businessperson who is proud of the way his or her business is conducted will be proud to be publicly associated with it.

    Some of our information may be out of date, as some companies may change location, telephone numbers or personnel. We welcome updates or corrections via email here.

    Sources Cited Much of the information on these pages is attributed to these sources:

    • DNS: the Internet's domain name registry
    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
    1. Re:Slashdotted... heres some info from the site by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2, Informative

      A couple of points on numbers 3 and 4:

      3. Check your state laws. Several states have laws on the books that say that, for returns of defective products, the vendor cannot charge a restocking fee even on return for refund. Some may require the vendor to cover return shipping as well. Returns because of mere dissatisfaction with the item (that is, the item isn't defective, merely not what you wanted) aren't covered by this. Find out what the law is, then pay with a major credit card so you can do a charge-back if neccesary.

      4. Again, check the law. Federal mail-order laws should apply here, and on those the price quoted at check-out is the final price. If the vendor wants to increase the price, he's got to contact you and get your approval first and must cancel the order if you don't pay the increase. If he's already charged you, he has to refund 100% of the charge, no deductions. Using a major credit card is again recommended, so you can do a charge-back in the event the merchant balks.

      In short, know what the law requires of both you and the vendor and what parts of the law trump or are trumped by the vendor's claims, and use a form of payment where you can if neccesary charge the vendor back and make him fight your credit-card company to get the money instead of you fighting him to get a refund.

      Of course, the above's no substitute for checking out the vendor before-hand. Look at reviews skeptically, and remember that if it looks too good a deal to be true it likely is.

  27. "Shyster"? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

    A shyster is an unscrupulous lawyer. How did shyster get to mean shady digital camera salesman?

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
    1. Re:"Shyster"? by Soko · · Score: 0, Troll

      A shyster is an unscrupulous lawyer. How did shyster get to mean shady digital camera salesman?

      Well, since there dosn't seem to be any lawyers left that have scruples, and we couldn't lose usage of such a cool word as shyster, we've just added one more definition.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:"Shyster"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from one of my favorite films, Blake Edwards' S.O.B.:

                Polly Reed: You're gonna let that SHYSTER on?

                Dr. Irving Finegarten: I could sue you for calling me that, Polly! A shyster is a disreputable lawyer. I'M a QUACK!

    3. Re:"Shyster"? by aug24 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you pair talking about? A shyster can be any cheat:

      http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=shyster
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=shyster

      Where did the Judaism ref com into things?

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    4. Re:"Shyster"? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      A shyster is someone who uses unscrupulous or unethical methods -- regardless of career/profession. Yes, it's mostly used to describe lawyers and politicians, but it can be used for any profession.

      ahref=http://www.wordreference.com/definition/shys terrel=url2html-31655http://www.wordreference.com/ definition/shyster>

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    5. Re:"Shyster"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He's confused shyster with shylock. For the benefit of the very young or completely uneducated, let me explain. Shylock was the Jewish usurer in Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice who lent money to Antonio. Their contract stipulated that Shylock could take compensation in the form of a pound of Antonio's flesh if Antonio failed to repay the loan. When Antonio is unable to pay off the loan, Shylock attempts to take his pound of flesh. Over the past 400 years, the term shylock has become a pejorative to mean any greedy or money-grubbing Jew.

    6. Re:"Shyster"? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 5, Informative
      You're thinking of "Shylock", which is indeed a slur against Jews. "Shyster" gets confused with shylock, but its etymology is fairly well understood to be from the German "Scheisser", lit. "shitter" but more figuratively "bullshitter" or "son-of-a-bitch."

      In all likelihood it got dragged into the U.S. via Yiddish, hence the Semitic connection. Calling a Jewish lawyer a shyster is probably rather tasteless.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    7. Re:"Shyster"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a Shyster is an unscrupulous Jewish lawyer.

      No, it's not.

      And I'm quite pissed /. would print something like this. Do they even have editors anymore?

      No, they don't. And who says you have any right not to be
      insulted - especially when it's your own ignorance which
      is causing the imagined insult?

  28. Not Limited to High-Tech by repetty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Two years ago I had to replace the headlight in my sedan. I eventually bought it from an Internet-based vendor but not before I realized that most of the sites I investigated were being run by a much smaller number of actual businesses.

    I have no idea how many companies are doing business selling car parts on the Internet but I'm sure that it's a small fraction of the "front-ends" that appear to be doing business.

    --Richard

    I paid $100 for a headlight for
    which the dealer quoted me $240.

    1. Re:Not Limited to High-Tech by eepok · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this with a lot of the Yahoo-based storefronts in the enthusiast PC-user's tech market. They will often have slightly differing prices for the same item. The concept of profit here is that most people would rather buy a quantity of their required parts from a single front and thus are willing to swallow the opportunity cost of higher prices for certain items. Furthermore, any single storefront (of many operated by a single entity) could better influence the market prices (in certain markets) through price fixing.

      To add to that, I see dial-up providers (no "s"?) doing the same thing in LA. I was just fixing a colleague's cousin's desktop when I noticed that they are not using broadband. I checked the dial-up number saved in their connections (to see if they can afford a DSL flavor with what they're paying for dial-up), did a quick google search and found at least 10 different "fronts" with the same content, but different wording and languages, for the dial up service. They all had the same price for service using the same phone numbers, but they artificially control a stronger market share for it.

      I would like to know if there's a website to archive/collect a listing of all such businesses. Can anyone help here?

    2. Re:Not Limited to High-Tech by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how many companies are doing business selling car parts on the Internet but I'm sure that it's a small fraction of the "front-ends" that appear to be doing business. A friend of mine who worked for a bingo supplies company said that their company operated many different website under different names selling slightly differentiated products in order to boost sales.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    3. Re:Not Limited to High-Tech by slacktide · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all of them are WorldPac distributors. They license the catalog software from WorldPac, set the pricing, and handle billing and customer service. WorldPac then handles order fulfillment and shipping. The website owner never has to handle inventory, and the distributor never has to handle customers. WorldPac, BTW, is a reputable company, been in business for decades as a parts distributor for independant service shops. As far as ordering websites, they vary, but I've had good service from Taylor Automotive in the past. Unlike some other front-ends, you can actually get a person on the phone if you need help.

    4. Re:Not Limited to High-Tech by ArtStone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why, yes there is - a similar "aha!" moment of my own was why I created it 8 years ago.

      http://www.findanisp.com/

      After going to your city using the (NPX) NXX-xxxx search, click on the Complete POP list by access number. It will nicely show you all of the ISPs grouped by the shared access numbers.

      Just because two ISPs share the same access numbers does not mean the companies have any connection other than they use the same wholesalers (ikano, Globalpops, YNP, CISP.CC, Qwest, Megapop being the main players). The wholesaler is noted in the listing where I believe I have determined the information.

      Note that recently "nationwide" ISPs for which I had no contact information were cut back to only show them in the state where they reside. The bloat for the redundant "virtual ISP" listings was not adding any value to the searches.

      But if they share the same customer support phone numbers, or are very vague about where the business is located, they may just be a template web site - being paid a referral commission and not even the legal entity you are entering into a contract with.

      These days - primarily due to the Telecom Reform Act of 1996 and the introduction of CLECs (Level3 being the most important player) - very few ISPs actually run their own dialup equipment. It just makes no economic sense for most ISPs. They can migrate their existing customers to one of those wholesalers, and cut the access cost from maybe $15/month to $4/month, plus give up the headaches of running their own 24x7 operations.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  29. Feedback System by decipher_saint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, so this site is trying to provide an impartial "scoreboard" system for determining if online retailers are trustworthy, but why should anyone trust these guys any more than any other merchant ranking site?

    The site is up and down like a yoyo right now so I can't find out how they are gathering their information, I mean if it's all anecdotal how do they discern between legitimate issues, PO'ed customers or just plain ol' bad luck?

    Personally, I only buy big ticket electronics and camera gear from local vendors because there is a bit less risk (i.e. no shipping) and I can put a human face on the store I'm buying from. I guess the other thing that makes me dubious about some online deals is when a vendor is claiming to sell something way below MSRP, that little "it's too good to be true" voice pipes up in my head.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  30. the internet is the great equalizer by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    never before could you reach out to all of humanity

    you guys realize there are some negatives to this idea? such as da wiseguys in crooklyn reaching out too?

    "yeah, it just fell off da back of a truck, yeah da receipt is for a refiderator, so what's it to you mr. palookaville? you gonna come to brooklyn and make something of it, huh?"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  31. Free market solution? by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Being pro-market, I see the scammers as the worst aspect of any market. In the past, it can be argued that regulations and restrictions through government was needed -- scammers were able to swindle thousands to millions of dollars before people were able to get the word out and warn each other.

    As the percentage of technically-savvy individuals grows, information about a dealer or retailer can be distributed in seconds. Thousands of individuals can moderate (or rate) a seller, and sellers can moderate (or rate) buyers instantly. eBay handles these transactions with very little government involvement or force.

    Scammers (such as the photo retailers) have been suckering people for DECADES. This is WITH government "protection" that many citizens believe they can rely on, yet we still see thousands of people getting swindled.

    As the old generation moves out of the buying phase and the new generation becomes the big power in buying, we will see less swindling and scamming. It is already very hard to scam someone in my age range (low 30s) as most of us check online before buying a large item. Google is adapting much of their search ability to cellphones (WAP, SMS and other means). I already check items out through my wireless PDA phone when I am on the go. I've saved myself a few hundred dollars by not purchasing items with bad reviews. I found these reviews through my phone in mere moments.

    The old ways of the retail industry are dying. As a retailer myself (who lost one of our stores because of a scamming employee and manager base), I know that the customer has more power than I do. When all you had was a local shop to buy from, you weren't able to negotiate for better quality, service or pricing. With next day service from thousands of online shops, the retailers are put on notice that they better offer more than just a product, or they'll go out of business.

    These photo scams will end without much government involvement. If they broke a contract or agreement, I can understand calling a lawyer. Hopefully in the short run enough people will comment about their bad experiences that the companies will be punished before more people are scammed -- and I see the strength of scammers quickly weakening as information is globally available, instantly.

    1. Re:Free market solution? by Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being pro-market, I see the scammers as the worst aspect of any market.

      Being pro-market, you support a dreamworld that doesn't and will never exist. The problem is that you (and way too many people in way too important positions) don't realize that free market theory is based on a number of highly unrealistic assumptions and will thus never work the way it is advertised.

      In an ideal free market, this problem would not even exist. One of the assumptions is that all participants have complete, truthful information. Obviously, that would be the end of any and all scammers.

      What you're seeing is just one of the many corners where the whole free market thing is failing. And yes, maybe government's job is to make sure the whole thing doesn't fall apart because of the trouble near the edges.
      Throwing a few people in jail certainly isn't a part of free market theory, but it does a fairly good job at replacing perfect information with honest, which while not perfect is a reasonably close substitute.

      The problem is, of course, that our governments, pretty much no matter which one you choose, are not exactly breeding pools or good examples of honesty and integrity.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Free market solution? by dada21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the assumptions is that all participants have complete, truthful information. Obviously, that would be the end of any and all scammers.

      That is NEVER an assumption -- in fact I believe the counter-fact to be true. In a free market, every transaction is based on the assumption that both parties feel they are profiting from the transaction. This case is based on the risk versus reward idea. The bigger the reward is, the bigger one assumes the risk is. If Camera W123 sells locally for $499, at Amazon for $449, and John's Photo Shop sells it for $379, you're gaining a huge reward. If you jump on that price, you're accepting a risk. It is personal greed that leads people to buy from deep discounters, and they have to acknowledge that there is always a risk in making a purchase. The reason many people buy locally for more money is to lower their risk.

      The problem is, of course, that our governments, pretty much no matter which one you choose, are not exactly breeding pools or good examples of honesty and integrity

      This is true -- government tends to be run by scammers and shysters, in my experience.

      What you're advocating is putting government in charge of markets -- the same government that is never transparent, hides information "legally" and has zero oversight except for a vote once every 4 years or so. I advocate dumping the government provisions and letting the new Internet information sharing structure take over. Now, we have instant voting based on consumer demand. If a lot of consumers get duped by a company, we'll soon have the ability to broadcast that information over many different sources.

      I'd like to see an SMS server where you can message a number "JohnPhotoShop.com" and have it return "50 positives, 300 negatives, 15 neutrals" I believe this will happen, very soon, as Google and many other companies are trying to gain brand share by providing free SMS services. I use FBOWEB.COM to track all my flights and used the free PDA version of the site for a few months. Now I purchased a subscription as the site is really worth the information I've received -- and it is always more accurate than what the airlines provide.

      I don't think government has protected us from scammers, ever. If anything, the platforms made by government are only used by scammers to find new loopholes (as is seen in the New York Photo scam that has been going on for 20 years). Now that information is available to EVERYONE, there is no excuse to getting scammed. Even some posts on slashdot today show that people didn't research the too-good-to-be-true pricing, and got scammed. Greed: you get what you deserve.

    3. Re:Free market solution? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Scammers (such as the photo retailers) have been suckering people for DECADES. This is WITH government "protection" that many citizens believe they can rely on, yet we still see thousands of people getting swindled.

      But how many of those "thousands" of people actually bother to complain about their experiences to the relevant authorities?

      I know that the customer has more power than I do

      No. The Customer (en masse) has more power, but each individual customer has next to none. I'd like to pay less for my fuel, for example, and I'm by no means alone. A few years ago there were protests about the price of petrol - depots being picketted, motorways blockaded. The result? Nothing, but a lot of hot air in Parliament and in the press. Prices are even higher now.

      I'm not saying that "the customer" can't make things better for themselves, but I really don't think they/we have half as much power as you think we do. Sure, if an isolated shop or part of a small chain starts ripping people off, people can drive it out of business by stopping going. If a multinational does it, tough.

    4. Re:Free market solution? by dada21 · · Score: 1

      But how many of those "thousands" of people actually bother to complain about their experiences to the relevant authorities?

      You're right, it isn't easy. For most bad experiences it may not be fraudulent or a scam -- maybe the customer paid too much, or the retailer doesn't offer warranty service on the product, or the customer ended up breaking the item and didn't want to admit it. I'm a retailer, and about 50% of our customer complaints that we fix aren't our fault.

      As it gets easier to rate a transaction (for both parties), people will start doing it. On eBay, they practically beg you to leave feedback, and I bet 90%+ of transaction always get feedback. As information is more readily available everywhere, you'll have more ways to moderate a transaction. This is good for both the buyer and the seller.

      I'd like to pay less for my fuel, for example, and I'm by no means alone. A few years ago there were protests about the price of petrol - depots being picketted, motorways blockaded. The result? Nothing, but a lot of hot air in Parliament and in the press. Prices are even higher now.

      Fuel prices are a collusion of the State and the fuel providers. In America, we have hundreds of different boutique blends of gasoline that are mandated by state and local legislatures. These custom blends are, of course, only provided by licensed gas blenders, and new licenses aren't available to provide added competition. Gas prices are high directly because of State intervention, not because gas stations are looking to gouge consumers. This is an issue to be debated in another forum, though.

      Sure, if an isolated shop or part of a small chain starts ripping people off, people can drive it out of business by stopping going. If a multinational does it, tough.

      That isn't true. In the U.S., Silo Electronics was forced out of business for selling too cheap and not backing up their products. For a few years, they were #1 in the electronics business. Before that, we saw other megaretailers go under because of bad service, bad selection and high prices. The reason Wal*Mart stays on top is because the consumers, as a whole, like what they get. The same is true for any megacorp.

      Do the megacorps use government's force against competitors? Absolutely. But this is legal force that is accepted by the voting public. If people have a problem with oil prices or Wal*Mart tactics, they should blame their elected officials, not the corporation taking advantage of laws that are in place because the public never said no, in fact, they continue to say yes.

    5. Re:Free market solution? by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd like to see an SMS server where you can message a number "JohnPhotoShop.com" and have it return "50 positives, 300 negatives, 15 neutrals"

      And soon, there will be 50 competing services of that kind, half of which receive kickbacks from the companies they rate well. How do you choose which service to trust? Maybe a meta-service that rates the info-services? Soon, there will be 50 competing meta-services...

      I don't think government has protected us from scammers, ever.

      I actually think it has. Not 100%, not ever perfectly and completely. However when I travel on the train and I'm not afraid of robbers, then to be quite honest it's not because I think any of my fellow travellers would stand up and stop them - it's because government has been successful in keeping crime rates at such a level that being robbed is an unlikely event.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:Free market solution? by dada21 · · Score: 1

      And soon, there will be 50 competing services of that kind, half of which receive kickbacks from the companies they rate well. How do you choose which service to trust? Maybe a meta-service that rates the info-services? Soon, there will be 50 competing meta-services...

      I think that is a ridiculous argument. Does eBay receive kickbacks from their top sellers? Recently a huge paintball discounter on eBay (with 10,000+ positive feedback) went out of business because they started to scam their customers. I believe from the first set of bad feedback to their bankruptcy, it was about 2 weeks. If a moderation system starts to get manipulated feedback, you'll know as it will start showing a bad company in a positive light, where other feedback providers don't. No megacorp can manipulate every review site, and you WILL see other websites providing an average review of a company. Information can be manipulated in short hops, but the overall picture is too big for any one company or cartel to shake down.

      However when I travel on the train and I'm not afraid of robbers, then to be quite honest it's not because I think any of my fellow travellers would stand up and stop them - it's because government has been successful in keeping crime rates at such a level that being robbed is an unlikely event.

      Really? John Lott has written two books on the subject of government protection of the people, and he found that more people are mugged and raped in areas where the police protection was high but personal protection was illegal (no gun permits). I feel safe in public because of the piece I conceal, and I have shown it twice to fend off attacks. Do I want the Wild West mentality? No, but I know I feel safer in Vegas and Texas than I do in Illinois or New York. I know someone near me is carrying and the burglars know the same thing.

      Government creates laws that criminals will break. The laws, in the long run, don't work as crime continues unabated, in my opinion. When it comes to criminal transactions, it is more and more likely that we'll be able to moderate criminals out of existance, rather than try to catch them in the act and put them in jail.

    7. Re:Free market solution? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Does eBay receive kickbacks from their top sellers?

      Ah! Now we're in the "see, monopolies are good" area. That was fast. :)
      Quite frankly, we are at the start of the "information age", and the Sun Tsu of info manipulation hasn't been written yet, and neither the Machiavelli nor the Clausewitz of the field has written his book, yet.
      I'm quite certain that in maybe 20 years, your average megacorporation will have an arsenal of standard info manipulation tools and techniques that make Goebbels propaganda look almost truthful.

      John Lott has written two books on the subject of government protection of the people, and he found that more people are mugged and raped in areas where the police protection was high but personal protection was illegal (no gun permits).

      Was that a US-only study or did he look at other countries, too? Because you know, if I'm a burglar and I know that here people have guns at home but 50 miles away they don't, then of course I'll travel that distance.

      Government creates laws that criminals will break.

      Yes, for about 80% of the laws, that is true. Because a huge volume of law deals with tax evasion, speed limits and other victimless crime. But the area we were talking about is where society pretty much agreed that killing or robbing people is a bad thing long before someone wrote that down. Government just puts into words what is the consensus.

      it is more and more likely that we'll be able to moderate criminals out of existance, rather than try to catch them in the act and put them in jail.

      You're forgetting the vital fact of online business: Transaction and installation costs. As the cost for setting up yet another scam business goes towards zero, the damage you do to the scammers by taking them down also goes towards nil.

      The only "market solution" to this problem is that all but a few very well known and highly respected companies go out of business. If everyone only trusts A, B and C then each of them has way too much of a market share and too much to lose to the other two to pull a fast one.
      The problem is, of course, that one day A will merge with B, put C out of business and become the only game in town. And suddenly the incentive for staying honest goes poof.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:Free market solution? by ben4242 · · Score: 1
      "I don't think government has protected us from scammers, ever."

      You are kidding, right?

      I figured I'd give one of the more obvious examples in the U.S. ... The Pure Food and Drug Act: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_Food_and_Drug_Ac t

      At some point, once it's understood better how to combat against Internet scams, maybe new laws will be written ...

    9. Re:Free market solution? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      EBay makes all its money from its top sellers.

      They pay the commissions to use the service afterall.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    10. Re:Free market solution? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see an SMS server where you can message a number "JohnPhotoShop.com" and have it return "50 positives, 300 negatives, 15 neutrals"

      Having ratings servers like this are a start, but ultimately they're prone to abuse as scammers sign up for accounts and add in false reviews. A better solution is probably using something like TrustRank, where one specifies networks of people whose opinions you trust, and trust/reputation ratings propagate through the network.

    11. Re:Free market solution? by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      That is NEVER an assumption -- in fact I believe the counter-fact to be true. In a free market, every transaction is based on the assumption that both parties feel they are profiting from the transaction.

      Wrong. Perfect and complete information is one of the assumptions of a perfectly competitive market.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_competition

  32. As they say...... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Once you know, you newegg". And Amazon for anything non-electronic....

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    1. Re:As they say...... by friedmud · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is _exactly_ my mentality lately.

      Those are the only two stores I have ordered off of in the past year... and I've ordered thousands of dollars worth of things for my house (just got married)...

      Trying to get the extra $5 off of something by using some shady site just isn't worth it anymore. Newegg and Amazon are always within 1% of the bottom of the barrel sites and I don't even have to think twice about ordering from them (actually... my credit card is just saved at both.... so I can order at will).

      A little piece of mind is worth a lot!

      Friedmud

    2. Re:As they say...... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      Well, newegg for a large variety of computer parts. And I can't forget about thinkgeek for the odd geek necessities...

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    3. Re:As they say...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once you know that newegg "editorializes" (read: changes) negative reviews... you know never to give newegg your money.

    4. Re:As they say...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinkgeek seems to charge A LOT for S&H.

  33. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by vingilot · · Score: 2, Informative

    unless it is adorama or B&H photo. They don't do sucker deals and have good reps in Photography circles.

    Jonathan

  34. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are some reputable stores like B&H Photo but I generally agree, all of the bad experiences I've had shopping online came from new york based stores.

  35. Global karma/integrity/reputation/rating system... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Rate each site you go to as either good or bad. Believe other people who vote similarly.

    --
    Deleted
  36. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Okay, except for maybe B&H Photo :)

    http://www.resellerratings.com/seller1914.html

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  37. A beowulf cluster of suckers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All caught on camera

  38. Other tricks by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It was interesting to see Butterflyphoto in that album - I bought a camera from them over the summer. The price was fine, but I found out that their deal is high-pressure phone sales. Right after I placed the order, they called me to let me know that they were holding it to make sure that's what I really wanted. See, I'd ordered a regular SD card and not a high speed SD card, and that couldn't possibly be what I wanted. (Of course, I'd just selected the 'premium' package with the case and SD card that THEY suggested...) I had to tell them several times that no, I REALLY didn't want to upgrade, especially not when I knew I could get the faster SD card from Costco cheaper.

    Anyway, I did get my camera, and you know what? It came with a high speed SD card. I wouldn't be surprised if they all ship like that, and they just do the high pressure sales thing to jack their profit margin up when they can.

    1. Re:Other tricks by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

      Heh, funny. My wife tried to buy a camera from one of those places once. They sent her an email telling HER to call THEM (I guess they don't like paying long-distance), so they could advertise, sorry, 'verify' her order. After being pressured to get the extended warranty, memory card, etc, she cancelled her order, and bought it for something like $2 cheaper somewhere else.

      We still had to pay to call them to get advertised to. What a crime.

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
  39. Racist Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why post about "Shysters", which is just phonetic "sheisters" (a derogatory term for Jews.) You wouldn't post an article about "Nigars" (black cigars)...

    1. Re:Racist Language by planetoid · · Score: 1

      shyster Audio pronunciation of "shyster" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (shstr)
      n. Slang

      An unethical, unscrupulous practitioner, especially of law.


      Looks like it has less to do with "Jewish racial slurs" than it has to do with parasitic individuals like Jack Thompson.

      --
      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  40. It's pretty easy to identify the unscrupulous... by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1
    ...traders. My rules of thumb are simple. (1) Don't order from companies whose brand names are so poor that they have to use domain names intended to capture random searches like www.wirelesshotspot4u.com or www.lesbianteenelectronics.com, especially if multiple such domains lead to one web site, (2) don't order from companies who can't afford to hire someone competent to design their web site and (3) don't order from New York.

    I've stuck to these rules and I've never experienced any trouble.

  41. Bust Buy is NOT a reputable Chain Store by meadandale · · Score: 1

    *grin*

    He mentioned "reputable chain" and "Best Buy" in the same sentence...Perchance you haven't seen This Website

    1. Re:Bust Buy is NOT a reputable Chain Store by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      "Reputable" as in having a reputation; no comment on what type of reputation. I have my fair share of Best Buy horror stories, but I learned to only expect so much from them and to not listen to one word their salespeople say. I go in, look for what I want, take that which they have (inventory is a major problem!), and leave, hopefully interacting as little as possible. They do have some good deals but you need to be smart. Personally, they're one of the reasons I shop Amazon a lot.

      And at least Best Buy is the beast you know, as opposed to Joe's Camera Shop and Off-Track Betting.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  42. Clue Please? by faust13 · · Score: 1

    Years ago I bought a Minolta Dig Camera from a Brooklyn dealer via CNet. I was curious how/why they were able to price the camera a good $100 less than Fry's Electronics. Low, the camera shows up, it's the genuine article. New and US region bound.

    Can someone explain how these guys operate? And whether they're as shady as many seem.

    1. Re:Clue Please? by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Stolen maybe?

    2. Re:Clue Please? by damsa · · Score: 1

      Fry's prices are actually pretty expensive for certain items. My friend bought his Kodak cam at Dell for 100 bucks cheaper than at Frys. These guys sell more cameras than a typical Frys so they may be able to negotiate a cheaper discount from the wholesalers. They mark up flashes, lenses, batteries higher but do not pressure you to buy them. These cameras are grey market, destined for a different market like Asia which sells cameras cheaper, a third party buys these cameras and then resells them in America. You by coincidence got the same camera as they sell in Vietnam. I bought a Canon S100 online at some store for 100 bucks cheaper than anywhere else and didnt have any problems and even got warranty service on it.

  43. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

    actually, you can get some pretty good prices from some of the electronics stores in NYC... and they're reputable as well. so don't go knocking all the NYC area electronics dealers...

    --
    please me, have no regrets.
  44. Credit card overcharge protection by efedora · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using Citibank/ATT Universal Card for online purchase. You can download an application that will let you generate a unique card number for each purchase. You can also limit the amount and set the expiration date.
    After the purchase you can modify the amount or date and even cancel the number.
    It won't stop you from making a dumb purchase but it will prevent excessive charges and unauthorized addtional charges to your credit card.

    1. Re:Credit card overcharge protection by Ancil · · Score: 1
      If your card is issued by MBNA, you can do this as well. Their name for it is "ShopSafe".

      Go to their website and you can sign up online in a few minutes. They also have a downloadable app you can run on your PDA to generate single-use CC numbers.

      I do this for all online purchases now. Even if a website isn't an outright scam, who's to say if they'll get hacked and my credit card number stolen? Using ShopSafe you can set charge limits, and close out a number after the expected charge has cleared.

  45. Basically by faqmaster · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Basically, never buy a digital camera online.

    --
    Are you...Are you some kind of genius?
    No, ma'am, I'm just a regular Slashdot reader.
  46. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I, and my company, buy plenty from B&H and Adorama. Also had good experiences with K&M.

    It's like any other major purchase... do your homework. Look for stores with established brick & mortar business and reputation. Don't be lured by too-good-to-be-true deals (they really are). Ask around with people who are in the know (there are plenty of photography enthusiast websites out there).

    Yes, there are a lot of shady people running shady ops in shady neighborhoods in the NY area. But that doesn't mean there aren't reputable shops as well.

    Caveat emptor.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  47. Did anybody RTFA??? by massysett · · Score: 1

    ...because I visited the link, and I can't find anything at all about "how the shysters work." All I can find are some spotty listings about a few online camera dealers, along with an "about" page which says that the site's administrators are possibly interested in link exchanges or ads (which would take away any credibility the site would otherwise have.) Overall not a remarkable site at all, and the posted link does not lead to the content mentioned on Slashdot. Either the site content changed or this was not Slashdot worthy at all.

    1. Re:Did anybody RTFA??? by earlylate · · Score: 1

      The submitted subject line was "How the Foolers Fool You"; the word shyster was not in my submission. How they fool you is: in part by rigging the ratings, in part by seeming to offer competition when they are in fact the same company. If you think A&M and Broadway, running separate and visually different ads in Popular Photography, are giving you a choice, you are being hoodwinked. Read the pages on search-sites.

  48. Look for B&H, Adorama, J&R by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are a few fine NY stores: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ http://www.adorama.com/ http://www.jandr.com/ In particular, B&H tends to carry everything photo related. Adorama carries almost as much as B&H. I've seen people happy with J&R, and I think 17th Street Photo (but I'm not sure of the last one), but they don't tend to have the depth B&H and Adorama has. So if you need say an Olympus 35-100mm f/2 lens, they will carry it, but you will get the glazed eye look if you ask for it at Best Buy. My one beef with B&H is they don't want to ship to maildrop places like The UPS store (I've had problems with delivery to the house, and prefer to get things delivered to the UPS store where somebody will sign for it, and I can pick it up at my leisure). So I tend to order from Adorama more often. Note that the price on these stores tends to be a fair price, but it isn't a 'deal' that the scam sites pretend to have.

    1. Re:Look for B&H, Adorama, J&R by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah I'll defintely second you on B&H. When I was looking to buy a digital camera, there were always a few places that had better prices than them, but all of them seemed to be one kind of sketchy or another. There is an outfit called "Broadway Photo" in particular that if it's still around, I'd advise everyone to avoid like the plague. (They've probably changed names three times now -- but they were a classic bait/switch/upcharge scam.)

      But B&H and Adorama are both great. I've never bought anything from J&R but I've visited their store and if I was ever going to get some computer-audio equipment I'd probably look at them (well, them and Sweetwater, who I can say have the best customer service of any company I've ever dealt with, for anything).

      The thing I like about B&H is that they offer you a choice generally of the U.S. or "Imported"/Graymarket/Made-for-export equipment. If you buy U.S. stuff, you get a warranty; if you get the Imported version (which is a misnomer, it's probably manufactured in the same factory) then it's slightly cheaper but the warranty is through B&H instead of the mfr. To me it's worth it to get the U.S. version on cameras and equipment, but I routinely buy Made-for-export film at the savings of a few dollars a roll on the more exotic Kodak stuff.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Look for B&H, Adorama, J&R by owlnation · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can thoroughly recommend B&H. European customers should check these guys out too, even though they are in NY.

      I bought a high end HD DV cam from them a few months ago and even after paying the customs costs it was half the price of any similar available in the EU (Germany especially).

      The camera was securely packed, and delivered within a week. Easy and painless.

  49. Dell does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Canon digital camera from Dell last year. I researched it and Dell actually had the lowest price, plus I found a working promo code somewhere. When I went to place the order I was swarmed with checkboxes and prompts for additional accesories that would easily have doubled the price of my order. It seemed like I had to clear checkboxes or click "No" dozens of times before I could buy the damn camera. But to Dell's credit, they did ship me the camera at the advertised price (and no death threats!).

  50. Cheesy reviews by garylian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Review sites for electronics and the like are chock full of super-cheesy, almost non-sensical reviews. If you look at reviews, and most of them consist of one or two lines of things that don't really matter, then it's a bogus review. There are so many of them, it becomes what I call "Surround and drown" fake reviews. Firefighters know that if you surround a fire with enough hoses, you can drown it sooner or later. These review sites have the same process, where all negative real reviews are drowned out by the fake ones.

    "Timely shipping!" That one is my favorite fake review. Um, you ship via UPS or FedEx Ground. It's 3 days, no matter how you slice it. How can it not be timely?

    "Great Customer Service!" Another of my favorites. The person hasn't done anything but buy something, in all likely hood. There hasn't been any customer service up to that point.

    "Easy to use website ordering!" Um, yeah, that's the first thing I look for when buying electronics over the web.

    If the review doesn't bring up any points, or doesn't provoke any honest thoughts, it is probably fake. Read the actual negative reviews.

    Besides, why does this surprise anyone? The same thing can be said for almost every PC/XBox, PS/PS2 magazine or website. They all get such pats on the back from the companies they review, that they don't have an honest review in them. It's the equivelent of letting a lifelong, die-hard Rolling Stones fan review one of their concerts. The review is going to read "Dude, they Rawked!", even if Keith Richards was so stoned he forgot to play his guitar.

  51. Mail Order, then Online... by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...the same rules apply now that applied 35 years ago when I started buying photo equipment. Most are places that will screw you one way or another. Some are downright crooks. And there are a few gems that stay in business year after year, garnering more and more loyal customers even though their prices aren't rock bottom.

    Personally, I use BHPhotoVideo.com for darn near everything photographic. Some things, like flash brackets, are personal taste problems. You just gotta touch and feel before buying. But for everything else, B&H is either the best or so close I can't tell the difference. They're businesslike (even brusque, sometimes) on the phone but they're also professional and reliable. The number of similarly high-quality online dealers in this market segment can be counted on the fingers of one hand. Actually, you only need two - B&H and Adorama. There are a few specialty dealers who are good for other things and if you need what they sell, they're wonderful. But for the full line of general photo gear available online, it's B&H and Adorama.

    The best guidance I know of for buying a camera or related equipment in the U.S. is at photo.net.

    1. Re:Mail Order, then Online... by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I recently did a lot of research before dropping a lot of money on a new digital SLR and ended up going with 17th Street Photo who had a very high rating and they too were very professional and shipped my order quickly. It's always good to check http://www.resellerratings.com before you buy. Another place someone at work recommended had a very bad rating and must have been one of the only positive ratings they ever had.

      Another place to check is the Better Business Bureau.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    2. Re:Mail Order, then Online... by radish · · Score: 1

      If you go to the B&H store you can play with anything you like. I usually check prices online, find that B&H are pretty much the cheapest of places I actually trust, then go in and pick it up in person. Paying sales tax is a pain, but I save on delivery.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Mail Order, then Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had good experiences with 17th Street as well. If you go to their brick-and-mortar store, you'll understand why they can be cheaper than B&H and Adorama: it's a much smaller outfit, with most of the business done online or over the phone. They don't have a ground floor store front, so they save on the rent and on the sales personnel. Can't be more than half a dozen people working out of a small office, compared with the dozens at B&H, which takes up the better part of an entire midtown city block. But if you go to 17th Street in person, you can look at and play with everything, just like at B&H and Adorama, only better: you'll probably be the only guy in the store and will have their full attention.

  52. Finding good reviews by sterno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the biggest challenge is actually finding reputable reviews on-line. The problem with this large inbred group of scam vendors and review sites is that it floods google such that any search for:

    "review " comes up with hundreds of bogus google bombs that have no valuable information in them. If you go to epinions.com, etc, unless an item has a fair number of reviews you can't trust that the reviewer isn't just astroturfing for the company's product.

    For the areas I have some expertise like computer hardware or cameras, I know exactly where to look. But if I'm stepping slightly outside the bounds of my knowledge it becomes difficult. I was subscribed to Consumer Reports for a while but the flaw with them is that their information is always a year out of date it seems.

    I'd definitely pay for a review site I could trust. Heck, I already do, having subscribed to Angie's List. Is there any equivalent for general consumer purchases?

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Finding good reviews by cetan · · Score: 5, Informative

      resellerratings.com is generally quite good and the results can be trusted. Of course, one should browse to be certain a particular store wasn't recently flooded with fake positive reviews.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    2. Re:Finding good reviews by AnyLoveIsGoodLove · · Score: 1

      Agreed.. That is why I use Consumer Reports where applicable. It does not cover technology in depth, but will give you a good idea for things such as digital cameras etc. Nothing replaces good old fashion research. One of the best skills I learned in college. Who said I'd never use my history degree.

      --
      "It's technical in a psychometric kind a way" -- C. Parish
    3. Re:Finding good reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't worry I modded him up for you... of course you both could be the same person and are just trying to scam the /. crowd ;)

    4. Re:Finding good reviews by feijai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But we were talking about electronics here, something Consumer Reports is astonishingly bad at. Their Mac coverage borders on the daftly ignorant. They famously reviewed the PowerPCs as "slow" but accidentally only ran interpreted 68000 programs on them, not the new ones. And they published a survey of virus trends which was so flawed that 17% of OS X users "reported" having a virus on their machines. They reported this as cause for concern, rather than realizing it was a signal that their methodology is flawed. And don't get me started on how little they know about PDAs. I trust CR's car data. But for electronics I look elsewhere. They're incompetent.

    5. Re:Finding good reviews by slaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with Consumer reports is that the reports and reviews are not written by experts. They are written by consumers, who have no idea what the hell they're dealing with.

      Consumer Reports "best buy" computer every year ends up being a Compaq or a Dell or an HP machine. Anyone who knows anything about computers will get a good chuckle out of their rationale for that rating.

      I know a guy who has said much the same thing about their ratings of HVAC equipment.

      I'd rather have the opinion of an expert than a purposefully ignorant "consumer".

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    6. Re:Finding good reviews by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      It's been years since I read an issue of CR, so maybe it's gotten better, but what stopped me from trusting it as a source on anything was a review of home theater receivers. They took a look at a whole bunch of receivers, some stereo, some Surround, some ProLogic (No AC-3, this was a long time ago), of widely different capabilities and prices, and ended up rating them based on their FM tuner performance.

    7. Re:Finding good reviews by Moofie · · Score: 3, Informative

      I stopped trusting Consumer Reports when they dinged some really nice mountain bikes for having front brakes that are "too powerful".

      If you can't lock up both wheels on dry pavement, your brakes are set up wrong. It's wise to not do that, but on a bicycle you are the ABS.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Finding good reviews by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      They're talking about best buys that will work out of the box. Sure you can save some dough by building it yourself, and MAYBE you could save some dough by buying from a local vendor, but I challenge you to find a national brand selling consumer level computers for less than HP/compaq, or Dell.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:Finding good reviews by bryan986 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually Consumer Reports is written by experts, NOT consumers. It is written for consumers. Their magazines contain no advertisements whatsoever and they do not accept money from any companies, so they have unbiased reviews.

      --
      There is no sig
    10. Re:Finding good reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true. Consumer Reports has a professional staff that evaluates items they rate. That's clear if you read their reviews. There is user feedback as well, but that tends to be how things have held up and how a manufacturer/vendor deals with complaints, etc.

    11. Re:Finding good reviews by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Now how do we know that you yourself don't have an interest in the people you are recommending here? (No offense - this is an exercise in theory).

      It seems we need some sort of web of trust for business reputations. Something like how Bittorrent handles bad peers. Hmmmmm... could we do the same for politicians?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    12. Re:Finding good reviews by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Consumer Reports is written FOR consumers. It is not written for servicers, repairers, experts, or resellers. Readers who have such skills should be reading an industry-specific magazine, or better yet, a trade journal or a techinical specification.

      In addition, CR almost always 'rates' a product on multiple aspects and explains how those aspects are combined to arrive at any overall ranking. They make it quite easy for a reader to focus on whichever criterion is most important to him.

      CR is best used to gain a quick, current look at a market segment you don't follow well enough to know the manufacturers, the current models, or even the publications. If the purchase you're making merits more info that CR provides, then by all means go get it.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    13. Re:Finding good reviews by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Yep, back when I was in the consumer electronics business, Consumer Reports rated the reliability of VCRs by brand and not by actual manufacturer. They would end up with identical machines (with different brands and facades) at opposite ends of their reliability scale. The information to determine actual manufacturer was readily available, but I guess their evaluation was just too shallow to use it.

      If they were worth the money, they could have done some real investigation and testing, and supplied detailed, meaningful results to their readers. Maybe they were too busy making videos of themselves wearing lab coats and pounding on mattresses...

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    14. Re:Finding good reviews by Riddlefox · · Score: 1

      Amusingly, while they seem to have decent data for reliability, many car enthusiasts scoff at Consumer Report's car tests.

      For instance, many of their acceleration reports are much, much slower than what other magazines report. For my Subaru Impreza WRX STi, they achieved a 0-60 time nearly half a second slower than what Road and Track, Car and Driver, etc, report (half a second is quite a long time for 0-60 times). For the 2002 WRX, their 0-60 time is eight tenths of a second slower than what C&D reports (that's huge!) They tested the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo and came up with a 0-60 time of 5.3 seconds; Car and Driver hit 5.4 for the WRX (and the EVO has 50+ more HP than the WRX!). CR similarily lags behind in measurements of other performance stats (braking, handling, etc).

      Another thing I find funny about the Impreza ratings is how much the data varies. For instance, in 2004, "Body Integrity" was rated as "Better than Average." In 2005, the same category was rated "Unsatisfactory." There was no change in the body between the 2004/2005 Imprezas. I can't see what would change their rating so drastically.

      I realize that CR is hardly a car enthusiast magazine, though, so it's forgivable that they aren't the world's best drivers. But unless you view your car as an appliance, it's generally better to look elsewhere for car reviews, in my humble opinion.

      I guess my point is that to pick a review site, you have to take into consideration the reviewer's point of view. For someone who doesn't have a clue about electronics, CR is probably great. For those of us who love computers, it's hopeless.

    15. Re:Finding good reviews by macdaddy · · Score: 1
      With politicians it's actually quite easy and foolproof.

      1) Simply bind the hands and feet of the politician in question.

      2) Chain a few cement blocks to the person's legs.

      3) Toss the politician into the Potomac River.

      4) Wait 5 minutes. If they float, they're bad news. If they sink, they're bad news. Either way, proceed to step 5.

      5) Profit!

      This method has been serving Sicily's finest for years

    16. Re:Finding good reviews by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll
      The problem with Consumer reports is that the reports and reviews are not written by experts.

      The other problem is their bizarre scoring criteria. Let's face it: their evaluations tend to have a left-of-center leaning. Now, that's not necessarily a bad thing when they're advocating mandatory safety requirements for cars, or lobbying for more consumer-friendly laws. However, it is a bad thing when they score down an otherwise ideal home theater because it draws more power at low volume than another, or when they rank one coffee over another because they disapprove of the way our government treats the farmers in the country of origin.

      Sure, I just invented those examples. However, if you've closely read their reviews for a long time, you'll start noticing a lot of similar subjective grading. I want a magazine that's like Consumer Reports, but which leaves political and economic concerns (beyond the price of the product) out of the equation.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    17. Re:Finding good reviews by Croaker · · Score: 1

      My big beef with Comsumer Reports (aside from the fact that they sold my name and address to 3rd party companies when I signed up for their web site, in direct violation of their privacy statement) is that for the fast moving consumer electronics field, their test results come out way too late. I remember when I was shopping for a small all-in-one stereo system. It just so happened that Consumer Reports had reviews of all-in-one stereos in that month's issue. And every single damned one of them were no longer available, as the manufacturers had come out with new models. I suppose I could sort of assume if the XYZ20 model was no longer available, that a favorable review of it probably meant that the XYZ21 was a good bet... but I'm sure we've all seen cases where a new revision to a product line has sucked.

      I also find it odd that the select so few options. Tae, for example, laptops. They reviewed just the Dells, HPs, Apples and IBMs. What about Fujitsu? Acer? All of the others?

    18. Re:Finding good reviews by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I don't know specifically what CR was doing at the time, I can tell you that frequently different standards of quality control are applied rebadged merchandise. For example, when Sears puts their name ('Kenmore') on appliacnes, they want a certain level of quality -- which may be more or less than the manufacturer would normally turn out, depending on the amount of money they want to spend.

      Also, reliability reports in CR are and always have been based on quality surveys sent out to (all) subscribers of the magazine.

      I think CR gets a bad rap just because they're relatively incompetent at rating computers and electronics.Their automotive coverage has vastly improved in recent years, and they nail the reliability of cars and trucks. And they are the standard benchmark for home appliance reviews. Ultimately, though, CR is just one tool, and can cover only so many products even within one class of appliances. If you're making a major purchase, you should use many tools to find information about it. And you definitely shouldn't discount CR as one of those tools (unless you're buying electronics...).

    19. Re:Finding good reviews by bani · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are written by consumers, who have no idea what the hell they're dealing with.

      You have a beef with CR, fine. That's no reason to go making shit up.

      CR has experts do the testing, which is plainly and comprehensively explained along with their testing methodology.

    20. Re:Finding good reviews by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      With politicians it's actually quite easy and foolproof.

      My approach to politicians: throw 'em in jail. If you don't know why, they do.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    21. Re:Finding good reviews by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      I trust CR's car data. But for electronics I look elsewhere. They're incompetent.

      CU's car data is misinformed as well (I'm still baffled at how they have consistently called the Mazda Miata overpowered...this is a good indicator of the value of their ratings). The problem is that they're generalists, and are not geared towards any specialty items. Because of this, publications geared reviews of speciality items (cars, electronics, computers, etc) tend to deliver more credible results.

      --

      -Turkey

    22. Re:Finding good reviews by Tower · · Score: 1

      For the home theater example... TCO is a valid concern for appliances (and that's really all that a home theater is)... if one system draws 70W at idle / low volume, and the other draws 200W at idle/low volume then that is certainly something to take into consideration. If all else is equal, than yes, the more power-hungry one should be rated slightly lower, but it is is true, this shouldn't be a heavily weighted category for an overall ranking, mostly just informational for those who care. (Along the lines of "Bonus points awarded since the faceplate can be either silver or brushed aluminum!".

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    23. Re:Finding good reviews by uncqual · · Score: 1
      It also annoys me when CR takes political stances on things. Indeed, for this reason I'm probably not going to renew our subscription (after many years of continuous subscribing) -- they've pushed me past the breaking point millimeter by millimeter.

      A classic example is their regular editorials calling for nationalized health care in the USA - it may be good, it may be bad, but it's a political issue of how society allocates and redistributes resources, not something a supposedly objective publication should be dealing with. If I want politics, I'll subscribe to Mother Jones or National Review - at least these publications are pretty clear on their biases.

      In CU's defense though, 25 years ago they had an "anti-feature" bias -- they seemed to think any neat feature was "unnecessary" - even many that WERE useful to the consumer. Fortunately they have substantially toned down that part of their Luddite and Birkenstock bias in the intervening period.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    24. Re:Finding good reviews by Jaster+Mareel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir Bedevere: There are ways of telling whether she is a witch.
      Peasant 1: Are there? Oh well, tell us.
      Sir Bedevere: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
      Peasant 1: Burn them.
      Sir Bedevere: And what do you burn, apart from witches?
      Peasant 1: More witches.
      Peasant 2: Wood.
      Sir Bedevere: Good. Now, why do witches burn?
      Peasant 3: ...because they're made of... wood?
      Sir Bedevere: Good. So how do you tell whether she is made of wood?
      Peasant 1: Build a bridge out of her.
      Sir Bedevere: But can you not also build bridges out of stone?
      Peasant 1: Oh yeah.
      Sir Bedevere: Does wood sink in water?
      Peasant 1: No, no, it floats!... It floats! Throw her into the pond!
      Sir Bedevere: No, no. What else floats in water?
      Peasant 1: Bread.
      Peasant 2: Apples.
      Peasant 3: Very small rocks.
      Peasant 1: Cider.
      Peasant 2: Gravy.
      Peasant 3: Cherries.
      Peasant 1: Mud.
      Peasant 2: Churches.
      Peasant 3: Lead! Lead!
      King Arthur: A Duck.
      Sir Bedevere: ...Exactly. So, logically...
      Peasant 1: If she weighed the same as a duck... she's made of wood.
      Sir Bedevere: And therefore...
      Peasant 2: ...A witch!

    25. Re:Finding good reviews by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      TCO is a valid concern for appliances (and that's really all that a home theater is)

      Oh, I understand that point, and it's legitimate. But if you're looking at $1,500 stereos, then TCO probably isn't high on your priority list, especially when the difference probably amount to a few cents per month.

      Put another way, I would be completely unsurprised to find that they'd ranked a Kia coupe over a BMW sedan because it got 30MPG instead of the Beemer's 28. People in the market for the latter have no interest in the former, and vice versa.

      The reviews I read really did place that much emphasis on what I considered trivial details, and once I noticed it, I couldn't not see it - the darn little fnords were everywhere.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    26. Re:Finding good reviews by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to my folks and most major appliances (washer dryer/dishwasher/fridge&freezer). They'd find one they liked go in to ask and find the company had discontinued it months ago with a new product. CR needs to move into the modern era of 6 mo product launch cycles.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    27. Re:Finding good reviews by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I decided after reading the research of the major financial houses and the independant smaller shops that most of the time, I'd rather have the advice of a known crooked expert than a straight forward idiot.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    28. Re:Finding good reviews by Eccles · · Score: 1

      For instance, many of their acceleration reports are much, much slower than what other magazines report.

      Perhaps they assume a less experienced driver?

      From reading things like 0-100-0 tests in auto mags, there was a fair bit of expertise involved in getting optimal acceleration depending on which are the driven wheels, tires, etc. Perhaps CU is just giving values for flooring it from a standing start.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    29. Re:Finding good reviews by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      It has been a long time since there were few enough models that CR could evaluate reliability by model. There are too many models that come out too often for an annual survey (which looks back over the past year) to provide information on specific models.

    30. Re:Finding good reviews by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      I don't think CR assumes anything. I think they do not have racers as drivers when they _measure_ the cars 0-60 time. I.e. it's more like how you drive on the street; tires from the factory left on for the break-in period, and the engine at idle when the light turns green and the clock starts. VS. engine at full power and the clutch and tranny taking the shock of the launch, and the slicks fully warmed up.

      Which could fully account for the half-second difference between CR's measured times and the car guys measurements.

    31. Re:Finding good reviews by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Body Integrity is not part of the normal new car review; it shows up in the used car statistics. CR generates those statistics from what readers send in on the annual survey. Real-world data.

    32. Re:Finding good reviews by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      CR buys their products at retail, does the review and writeup, and then prints the results in the magazine. That can takes months. The manufacturers have their reasons for changing the products so frequently that this kind of information gets stale quickly. Is that CR's fault or the manufacturer?

      To help alleviate this, for the last several years, they indicate when models are replaced by substantially similar models.

    33. Re:Finding good reviews by el+americano · · Score: 1

      I used to value the reviews found on a previous favorite electronics site: newegg.com - but now that they are known to delete negative reviews (beyond just bad language to describe the product in question) the review feature is actually a reason not to recommend it to friends and acquiantances.

      I think they just missed the concept of providing something useful to the customer in order to make them a regular visitor, and they're enjoying the increased sales to people who don't realize that they are being duped. Oh sure, there's a disclaimer that says no one should rely on their reviews when making a product purchase (but here they are, so please do just that)

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    34. Re:Finding good reviews by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Right = Big Business
      Left = Consumer.

      Guess where a magazine titled "Consumer Reports" is going to find their allegiance?

    35. Re:Finding good reviews by TheDugong · · Score: 1

      yabut... with whitegoods I am not interested in a 6 month cycle. I want to know if it is still going to be working in 5, 10, 15 years time. Refregerators, washing machines, driers and the like are not going to be obsolete in 6 months like PCs and perhaps entertainment electronics may be (although even that is arguable).

      With consumer reports you can get this sort of info and look at brands trends. Realistically, this is the only way it can be done.

    36. Re:Finding good reviews by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Right = Big Business
      Left = Consumer.

      That is correct - from the perspective of the left. In the point of view of the right:

      Left = Big Government
      Right = Individual

      So, from a conservative viewpoint, Consumer Reports takes the side of Big Government instead of individuals.

      Which way you see it, then, largely depends on your political position. It's definitely not universally agreed.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    37. Re:Finding good reviews by rifter · · Score: 1

      "Right = Big Business

      Left = Consumer."

      That is correct - from the perspective of the left. In the point of view of the right:

      Left = Big Government

      Right = Individual

      So, from a conservative viewpoint, Consumer Reports takes the side of Big Government instead of individuals.

      Which way you see it, then, largely depends on your political position. It's definitely not universally agreed.

      So to bring synthesis to the two,

      Left=Government/"Society" should take care of the population

      Right=You're on your own. Take care of yourself (As O'Reilly advised the victims of hurricanes recently).

      I'd say there's room for both. For instance the self-reliance frequently ascribed to right-wingers is, I think, a good idea as an individual philosophy. The more self-reliant you are, the more you will be able to cope with problems created by sorry leaders. Why depend on politicians to solve problems when they are usually only good at creating them? (Interestingly this self-reliant attitude seems not to be shared by right-wing business owners, who claim to need as many subsidies, breaks, and government breaks as they possibly can get [ like help getting cheaper labour, breaking strikes, and allowing them to break financial and environmental laws with impunity ] .) But it's a horrible philosophy for society and government, because basically means abdicating responsibility. Government is only there to take care of citizens. We agree to pay taxes and obey laws in return for the services the government provides in helping society along (by enforcing laws, providing for the general welfare, etc etc as per the Constitution).

      It's crass to expect everyone to be able to afford a retirement plan and an SUV so they can escape hurricanes and have savings to pay for the replacement of their loss. Is it a good idea to have those things? Is it stupid not to if you can? Sure! But it is wrong to assume everyone is going to have that. I tend to have most of teh emergency equipment a person would need and extra food and water in my house. But if you can't afford that, you can't. And it's wrong to shift the blame from government officials who hoarded relief supplies for themselves and failed to stock shelters at all, who did not use vehicles they controlled to help with evacuations, to the poor homeless guy and say "Well you should have used your credit card to rent an SUV like I did, chump. Sucks to be you."

      And as for retirement. Why is the blame for lack of retirement savings in America solely on the shoulders of the individuals who need to retire? Yes, we are notoriously bad at saving. Yes, it is everyone's responsibility to try to save for their retirement. But why do the executives who overtly stole from 401k plans (to say nothing of the ones that just regularly tank because they are a thinly veiled attempt to recapture agwes rather than a real retirement plan) get off scott free? Why aren't they responsible? Even government entities are frequently guilty of mismanaging the retirement funds of their employees. But if the retirement fund is ruined/spent/whatever the company that does it never has to return the loss. Why is it that conservatives want to paint the employees who dutifuly saved from every paycheck into this retirement fund as irresponsible and the companies that screw up the fund are never held responsible? Why are they so keen to turn the current Social Security system into a 401k plan when so many of those are doing so badly? If the problem is really too many on the rolls, why don't they want to change the system so that it only pays out based on need (so that "wealthy" people, by some agreed-pon definition, who had the wherewithal, presumably, to save for a decent retirement, don't get social security so that more of the "poor" can)? Republican millionaires have no problem recieving tax breaks for businesses,

    38. Re:Finding good reviews by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      During the period of my experience, 8+ years ago, there were as many brands and models of VCRs as ever. At that time certain very popular brands were selling lines with models from 2 or more manufacturers within the same year.

      CR could have at least provided some basic information with respect to this, i.e. - "RCA's line for this year is comprised of Samsung-manufactured units on the low end, Hitachi machines in the mid-range, and Matsushita (Panasonic) units on the high-end. Zenith's line, which in previous years was built by JVC, is now being supplied by GoldStar." And with slightly more work, they could have broken down models by manufacturer -- the codes are on the back, they could have just gone to the stores and looked.

      If they can't rate something meaningfully, they shouldn't do it. Rating by brand is just not useful. Brands are traded all the time, with little or no guarantee of consistency in the products they represent.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    39. Re:Finding good reviews by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

      Just my $.02 here, but I have to agree it is their bizare rating system that is the problem. A number of years ago (10-15) they did a review of 35 mm SLR cameras. The camera they rated the highest was the Canon EOS Rebel, the camera they rated the lowest was the Canon EOS 1. The rebel was the cheapest camera Canon built at the time and the EOS 1 the most expensive. Why did the rebel win, the answer is in their scoring, weight and number of buttons (lighter weight, fewer buttons were considered best) the Rebel had ab all plastic body, the EOS 1 all metal.

      Ike

    40. Re:Finding good reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did something like this with their recent DSLR mini-reviews, where they rated the Canon Digital Rebel XT higher than the Canon EOS 20D.

    41. Re:Finding good reviews by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not CR that's incompetent with computers and cameras, but consumers themselves? Might be an indicator to the designers. Feature creep is not always good. Sometimes it's better to do like *shudder* Apple and just make the parts that work work really well. Not for everyone, but I think it'd make a lot of consumers happier and more able to deal with a lot of their technology.

    42. Re:Finding good reviews by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Consumer Reports is written FOR consumers. It is not written for servicers, repairers, experts, or resellers. Readers who have such skills should be reading an industry-specific magazine, or better yet, a trade journal or a techinical specification.

      So, in the given example, what the hell good are they? Generally, consumers are interested in more than the FM tuner on a $500 receiver. I never use mine, so it's useless to me. Seriously, if a stereo review isn't supposed to address the concerns of experts (in stereo usage, I suppose) and it doesn't do much in the way of quantifying performance, then who exactly is this consumer? Are they the one who says "CR gave brand X a gold star, so I'll take that one?", because that's sort of circular.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    43. Re:Finding good reviews by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      But if you're looking at $1,500 stereos, then TCO probably isn't high on your priority list,

      Betcha it is - if you're spending $1500 on a stereo, you want to minimize headaches and maximize your return. Just because it costs more than $1000 doesn't make value decisions go away.

      Put another way, I would be completely unsurprised to find that they'd ranked a Kia coupe over a BMW sedan because it got 30MPG instead of the Beemer's 28. People in the market for the latter have no interest in the former, and vice versa.

      I would be shocked - Kias cost under $10k new, and have an iffy reliability history. Beemers aren't tops in reliability, but they do well, and they've got a fair bit more in the road feel department (useful if you want to know when to slow down). Kias, from all reports, feel dead. I dunno why you'd even compare them, though, as they're completely different categories.

      /belaboring a tangential point, sorry.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    44. Re:Finding good reviews by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Yeah but what good is a review if you cannot find the model that was expected to last 10-15 years, and the model's within the brand have considerable volatilty of reliability?

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    45. Re:Finding good reviews by Riddlefox · · Score: 1

      For the electronics reviews, perhaps they assume a less experienced user? For reading things like data transfer times in computer mags, there's a fair bit of expertise involved in getting optimal transfer rates depending on the CPU's used, the hard drives used, network type, etc. Perhaps CR is just giving values for running the machines right out of the box.

      You illustrated my point!

      CR isn't a magazine that uses specialists to review products. The car guy covered in motor oil is interested in wringing out every last tenth in the 1/4 mile. The computer guy covered in Cheetos dust is interested in wringing out every last frame per second in the latest game. CR doesn't cater to them in their interests. CR caters to the car guy when he needs a PDA to do some fine tuning on his ECU, and to the computer guy when he needs a new car to carry his carcass to the 7/11 to get more Cheetos - in other words, they know something about everything, and not everything about something.

      Their user reports are sort of silly too.

      As the OS X example illustrates and my Impreza body integrity rating illustrates, what users experience don't always make sense. Why would the 05 Impreza rust more than the 04 Impreza, when there was no change to the bodies of the cars? Why would so many OS X users report having a virus when there aren't any (are there? I'm not a Mac guy; I need to right click ;)).

  53. You may want to rent this movie by plopez · · Score: 1

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0208092/

    great british gangster film. be sure to use the pikie subtitles.

    In general, a movie by Guy RItchie is worth the watching.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:You may want to rent this movie by lrucker · · Score: 1
      In general, a movie by Guy RItchie is worth the watching.

      Unless it stars Madonna.

  54. Why not Amazon? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    "Once you know, you newegg". And Amazon for anything non-electronic....

    What's wrong with Amazon for electronics?

    1. Re:Why not Amazon? by LazyBoy · · Score: 1

      Prices.

      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  55. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by nbvb · · Score: 1

    +50 points for mentioning Adorama!

    The folks there are absolutely fantastic. Very helpful, knowledgable, and offer a fair price. You can probably find stuff for a few dollars less elsewhere, but you don't know who you're dealing with.

    Ask for Peter in the telescope department; he's sharp!

  56. No, it just means unscrupuolus lawyer. Or shitter by karlandtanya · · Score: 5, Informative
    Probably alteration of German Scheisser, son of a bitch, bastard, from scheissen, to defecate, from Middle High German schzen, from Old High German skzzan.


    unscrupulous lawyer 1843, U.S. slang, probably altered from Ger. Scheisser "incompetent worthless person," from Scheisse "shit," from O.H.G. skizzan "to defecate" (see shit).


    shyster--'shIs-t Etymology: probably from German Scheisser, literally, defecator
    : one who is professionally unscrupulous especially in the practice of law or politics : PETTIFOGGER


    You're not helping anyone. You make people with a legitimate beef look petty and you present people with no bad intentions at all as anti-semitic (or specifically anti-Jewish, as there are a lot more semitic people than just Jews).
    Now, go into a closet and say "niggardly" a hundred times.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  57. So...who do I trust? by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    I don't know **** about buying cameras/consumer electronics. WTF am I supposed to trust? I want to buy a digital camera, but all the sites look about the same to me...

    Sure, it's easy to say "I'd rather pay a little more for a place I trust", but that doesn't really help all that much. If I just go to a place that charges a bit more, it's probably just more money in their pocket, not more value for me.

    I hear enough about various places manipulating their reputations (either by threatening/suing websites with bad press, or by manipulating ratings on other sites, etc) that I can't really say who is "reputable" any more. Sure, I can say, "My brother bought one thing from them and it was ok", but that only goes so far...

    --LWM

    1. Re:So...who do I trust? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      The best way is to look for forums devoted to the type of product that you are looking for. Read the posts from other people. The more active the forum is, the better. Most forums should have some sort of "hot deals" section. If you read those, often a person will say "XXX is on sale at $yyy over at ZZZ.com." If several people reply "I would never buy from ZZZ.com", then you know. On the other hand, if people reply "I like ZZZ.com", then buy with confidence.

      Of course, this takes a little time, but it really is the best way.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  58. Re:PriceWatch by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    Pricewatch is better for getting the feeling of what something should cost, rather than a good pointer. Many of the shops on Pricewatch are shady, and may substitute something "equilivent" but less good. (Say higher-spec pc-chips motherboard for lower-spec, but stable, abit motherboard.)

    Remember, most of the sites like pricewatch simply spider member sites for prices. If the member has some other system on the page, with hidden text of what you want - you may find what you were not looking for.

    (Yes I still use Pricewatch exclusively, but there are some merchants that will give you exactly what you ask for (and won't fit), and some merchants who will help you (more), and some who are ....)

  59. Not always by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is one at least that is a reputable dealer, B&H Photo. They are a massive store and sell still and video cameras from consumer up to extremely high end pro. They do audio gear, consumer and pro too. Of course because their are reputable their prices are good, but nothing special. However they are worth checking. I got my Yamaha reciever from them. Yamaha requires their recievers be purchased from a license dealer to honour warantee. All the local ones wanted full MSRP, however Yamaha lists B&H as a licensed dealer. Checked with them and it was much cheaper, even with $50 shipping.

    So there ARE reputable dealers in New York, you just need to be careful. One thing to check is to see if they are authorized dealers. You can't fake something like that (Yamaha does the listing on their own site) and that's not something that a scammy, fly-by-night is going to do since the company wouldn't license them anyhow. If they are an authorized dealer for the companies that do that kind of thing, they are probably on the up and up.

    1. Re:Not always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yamaha does NOT require you to purchase products from a licensed/approved dealer. Like most decent companies, they'll honor it regardless.

  60. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by Avohir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I once worked for a nefarious underground organization called Krispy Kreme. We didn't accept AMEX because it would have greatly cut into our clandestine plans of total world domination. But now you seem to have uncovered the secret! So many years of work down the drain!

    --
    To err is human, to really foul up requires a computer
  61. How about "price matching" in stores? by dmatos · · Score: 1

    If I found a deal that looked too good to be true, I'd be inclined to take the website to one of my local stores that touts a price matching policy. That way, if they accept the price, you get a good deal, you see what you're buying before you pay for it, and there's a human face you can go and talk to if anything goes wrong.

    The trick is in getting the local retailer to accept the website-listed "good deal". I do know of a couple that have well-defined posted rules for their price matching policies, and I'm sure some accept website listings as valid prices as well. Try checking it out in your area.

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. Brick & Mortar Beach Camera by pkiesel · · Score: 1

    I've bought four cameras from Beach Camera - one from their Green Brook store and the rest online. Their site is a good place to shop, but if you're a connoisseur of high-pressure sales technique, go to the brick & mortar store on Rt 22. It's the next best thing to NYC.

  64. Other recommended online shopping sites by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll add my $0.02 based on my personal shopping experiences. I've had good results with:

    Newegg (low prices, responsive customer service, prompt, very wide selection)
    ZipZoomFly (lots of free 2nd day shipping, low prices, responsive customer service)
    TechForLess (Bought an open-box UPS from them. Prompt, good prices)
    AtomicPark (Software mainly but good prices and free shipping for holidays)
    Amazon (books, cds, dvds)

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by rco3 · · Score: 1

    But were you avoiding AMEX to prevent their uncovering your Krispy Krimes? "... And I've have gotten away with it, too, if it hadn't been for you darned meddling KIDS!"

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  67. Quite upsetting! At least I still have the radio.. by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    Book stores and Groceries both are corrupt?

    I am quite distressed to learn of this! In order to relax I shall go escape to the democratic safety of Top 40 hit music on the radio.

  68. Yes, Brooklyn is packed with honest folks by jasongetsdown · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, since I live in Brooklyn I guess I'll just trot over to my friendly neighborhood Priceritephoto...

    --
    useless sig advice - Read Nabokov.
  69. Why buy new at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.fredmiranda.com/ has a great Buy & Sell forum. Hundreds of items are sold on there every week, and the items are usually in excellent condition and a great bargain. I posted a message indicating I was looking for a specific lens and had it paid for through PayPal a few hours later. I received the lens and it was in immaculate condition, with the original box, warranty card--even receipt. I was not surprised to find I was the third owner. Photography people tend to take care of their equipment.

  70. You think this is new? by Wicked187 · · Score: 1

    This happens all the time, in all industries. For technology, look at ISPs and web hosts. Reselling is the cause here. For other industries, look at automotive. Are you doing to try and tell me a GMC Envoy is different than a Chevy Trailblazer? Or that a Chevy Cavalier is different than a Pontiac Sunfire? GM owns Chevy, GMC, Pontiac, Buick, Cadillac, Oldsmobile, Saturn, Hummer, and Saab. Ford does it with Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Jaguar, Mazda, Volvo, Land Rover, and Aston Martin. Daimler Chrysler does it with Dodge, Chrysler, and Jeep (Not to mention the German cars). Then you have the same thing with Japanese vehicles... Toyota owns Lexus. Did you know that the snazzy Lexus RX300 SUV is actually a Toyota Camry with a different body? Mitsubishi and Infiniti...

    The all do it. You are being suckered every day, if that is what you wanna think of it as. These companies are just marketing to different niches. If you ran a business, wouldn't you try to get your products to the right channels? I don't think that there is anything ethical here... Although, the idea of the VCR and the walkie-talkies is in the unethical arena.

    Just know what you are buying. Plain and simple. If you cannot put enough time and effort into figuring out what it actually is that you are buying, then it is either not worth buying, or you should expect the potential for being ripped off.

    --
    Politics, Life, and More on my Aspiring for the Future
    1. Re:You think this is new? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      You are exactly right. I can think of many other examples. Nike now owns Converse (and my beloved Chuck Taylors), Harmann Kardon owns JBL, Maytag is selling out to the highest bidder and the list goes on. Difference probably is it's much easier to put up a website claiming to be an independent reviewer of services that's completely biased and make it difficult for anyone to find out. That's when it becomes unethical and even fraudulent.

    2. Re:You think this is new? by nuggz · · Score: 1

      There can be some similarities between vehicles, but also significant differences.

      Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe
      very similar

      Nissan Altima/Murano
      Not as similar.

      Cows have 3 main products I'm aware of
      Steak, S**t, Milk
      I wouldn't argue they're the same

  71. Just buy from B&H Photo or Adorama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just buy from B&H Photo or Adorama. They've been around for years and their prices are as low as you'll usually find. I've never had any problems ordering or returning merchandise and they don't pressure you.

    http://www.bhphoto.com/
    http://www.adorama.com/

    The markups on electronics are very slim. If someone is selling you an electronic product for hundreds below everyone else you're being ripped off.

    1. Re:Just buy from B&H Photo or Adorama by Vreejack · · Score: 1

      I recently discovered that B&H has a wonderful brick & mortar shop in Manattan. If you are not from NY it's worth a visit just to see the automated merchandise transferral system (interesting shoplifting prevention) and the stereotypical Hasidic clerks.

      It's a lot cheaper than visiting another planet but just as fascinating for the photographer.

      --
      "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
  72. arabs, etc by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 1

    Actually, the ethnic breakdown of the bottom-feeder camera stores in NYC is an intersting mix: lots of Arabs, yes, but probably a slim majority are either Israeli or other middle-eastern Jewish ("Crazy" Eddie Antar being the most famous of the lot -- the Antars were all Syrian Jews), but also a good chunk of Russian, Polish, Turkish and other assorted Eastern/Central European and "near east" ethnicities.

    Not all of them are criminal -- a lot of the completely legitimate places like J&R and B&H are run by people from the same places -- but you'd have to be off your rocker to order anything from a camera store in the 11xxx area code without having a face-to-face/handshake relationship with the staff.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  73. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, AMEX hasn't been as bad as I thought from the merchant side. The discount rate's not great, but I can live with it. Getting set up wasn't hard, and I pay like $5/month for service. Granted, I have very little AMEX volume, and larger merchants pay more. But no complaints so far...

  74. Computer Shopper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure we all remember the phone-book-thick Computer Shopper magazines. Tons of RAM, CPU, and disk vendors advertising in there did the same trick. This certainly isn't exclusive to the Internet, nor to camera vendors.

    The best example I can think of off the top of my head is Dirt Cheap Drives aka Megahaus.

  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Politically incorrect, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With few exceptions, these companies are owned and operated by one particular ethnic group. If you study the pictures above or know anything about the NY areas depicted, you'll know what I mean. These types of scam operations only serve to reinforce certain ethnic stereotypes that other honest businessmen/women in this group have striven so hard to fight.

  77. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    AMEX takes about twice as much of a cut though, something like 6% or so of every sale goes to AMEX, which is a lot of money.

  78. Common ownership does not always equal deception by ldholtsclaw · · Score: 1

    Although I've seen the store-front photos of some of the vendors referenced in TFA and would not consider purchasing anything from them due to reputation alone, I want to point out that doing business under several names is not necessarily the "smoking gun" being intimated in this discussion.

    I have a several clients (Pest Control companies) which operate under more than one name. Most times everything is run from the same office using the same personnel but, in at least one case, there are two separate offices and, with the exception of occasional "borrowing" of service technicians, distinct personnel. It's humorous to hear a technician relate comments by customers "I don't like those XXX guys -- you do such a better job!" when, in fact, he normally works for "XXX" and is just filling in that day. Although it sounds fishy on the surface, I have personally been in each of the offices with complete access to their databases and never have I seen anything to indicate any dishonest or disreputable business practices.

    This is not to say I don't have any clients which seem a little shady, but the ones I have had access to with multiple names are not among them. So, just because two sites might be traced back to the same operator, this does not, in and of itself, automatically make them dishonest (though I'd certainly be digging a little deeper).

  79. Is "foreigner" a race? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People shout "racism" without understanding what it means.

    Look up "racism" and then look up "xenophobic". Understand the difference.

    Can you be "racist" against canandians? What "race" are Canadians?

    Seriously, it strikes me that you really have no clue what a "race" is, and if you don't have a clue what a "race" is, then you certainly have no clue what "racism" is.

  80. minor nitpick: anti-semitic IS anti-Jewish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While you are correct that there are plenty of non-Jewish Semitic people, the adjective "anti-Semitic" has always been used to refer specifically to the hatred of Jews. It entered English via the German word "antisemitismus", which was created to replace the word "Judenhasse" -- Jew-hate.

    I have been unable to find any instance of "antisemitism" being used to refer to all Semitic people. I welcome counterexamples.

  81. Another B&H recommendation by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    I have purchased (from B&H) a Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L IS a Canon 100mm f2.8 A remote control various filters never had any problems, reasonable prices.

  82. Another horror story! by st0ner1 · · Score: 1

    Here's My account of a recent still ongoing experience with Eracks
    I ordered two 1U servers servers from Eracks on 9/6/05 and paid with a
    credit card. I received a order confirmation within a few minutes.

    Seven Days later on the 13th I had still had not heard from Eracks or received the equipment. I made email
    and inquiries and then went to the website to look for the phone number for Eracks. The phone number
    was not on the website only the Fax number and support email addresses. A couple of whois queries later
    I had a phone number and placed the first of Many calls to Eracks. This time I only got to leave voicemail
    as there was no response.

    On the 14th there was still no response to my emails of voicemail messages so I got on the phone and got
    a person this time. This person "Fred" was farmiliar with my order and confirmed that the servers would
    ship at the end of the week or early the following week on or around the 16th or 19th and that I could
    expect tracking numbers via email when they shipped.

    Sept 19th no tracking numbers so I called again to see what was going on. Fred was now telling me that
    there was a problem with the motherboards on the systems I ordered and that they needed to be replaced.
    I could expect the servers to ship on the 21st.

    Sept 21st Hooray tracking numbers! Shipper says that I should expect shipment around the 23rd.

    Sept 23rd thru Sept 26th No shipment

    Sept 26th No shipment On this day I call DHL to figure out where the shipment is. DHL tells me that the
    shipment was never received on the sender end and that I will not be receiving shipment on those tracking
    numbers.

    Calls into Eracks that morning were met with confusion and requests to call back later when the
    "shipping guys were in" Fred was also unavailable.

    Later that day I did receive a call from Fred and he explained that there was a mixup on their end and
    that the servers did not ship as scheduled on the 21st. There were some vague references to lengthy
    burn in testing and other factors that delayed shipment. My inquiries as to why these details took a week
    uncover and communicate with me were met with silence. Fred promises to ship the servers next day on the
    28th.

    Sept 28th servers ship according to UPS tracking information.

    Sept 29th Both servers arrived, after unboxing the servers servers I proceeded to attach the rackmount
    brackets to the case on the first server. They did not fit! I took some digital picures of the
    cases and the brackets and emailed these to Eracks hoping for some new rackmount brackets with a hole
    pattern that matched the cases they sent me. I was issued a case number by the support system.

    Sept 29th I started a destructive read write test on the disks on the first system. This was in response
    to the shipping schock sensors being tripped.
    Sept 30th thru Oct 3rd no response on rackmount bracket problem. In fact I never heard from Eracks
    support on this issue.


    Oct 3rd System 1 built for customer and deployed. I had to eat the cost of some rack mount shelves for the
    customer because of useless rack mount brackets shipped with the servers.

    Oct 4th thru Oct 10th no response on rackmount bracket problem.

    Oct 11th System fails midmorning. Subsequent investigation shows a probable disk controller or disk failure.

    Oct 11th 8:45 am Email to support@eracks.com and Fred outlining problem and requesting callback

    Oct 12th 9:30 am voicemail live personnel not available left at Eracks same information as above.
    Oct 12th 10:30 am call attempt voicemail system again.
    Oct 12th 4:00pm call reaches Fred. I explain the situation, my unhappiness with the systems and
    the complete lack of support . I explain that I will be returning both systems as I have already
    secured and installed replacements

    1. Re:Another horror story! by Ooblek · · Score: 1
      Rack mount hardware is hell. There are probably many different rack mounting standards, and it is almost never the case that the people you are buying from happen to sell rack kits that fit your rack. I used to see this problem all the time with pro audio/video rack mounting. Normally, all the rack mount hardware was bought separately. This allowed us to know what racks and rack hardware to buy, and rack mounting was not a problem. On the odd occasion we got some equipment in a rack made in the UK, we would need a whole different set of rack mount hardware.

      Of course, you not knowing about racks is not the company's fault. I also wouldn't have bothered to plug them in if I'd seen the shock sensors, they'd be heading right back to the manufacturer.

      This is no excuse for bad customer service though. I'd call my card company and just dispute the whole amount. Tell them to take their 15% restocking fee and stuff it.

    2. Re:Another horror story! by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      I had a bit of a problem when I ordered a server from them years ago (back in 2001 I think).

      I got double charged for the server (but a quick call to discover took care of that). The hardware passed my burnin tests, but went flaky about 6-8 months after I set it up. I ended up just replacing the motherboard with one I had lying around, and things worked much better.

      Still, the case was nice, and I didn't have any problems with the brackets.

  83. Re:No, it just means unscrupuolus lawyer. Or shitt by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
    Perhaps the reference should refer to Shylock, the Jewish lawyer from Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. The first three letters are the same, which is the entire first syllable. That should be more than enough for Slashdot.

    The issue is of Shylock and antisemitism is dicussed at more length than I am willing to read right now at this site. A more concise summary of Shylock is over yonder.

    --
    Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  84. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by Mordantos · · Score: 1
    I only use my American Express (AMEX). I can't tell you how many times AMEX has helped with fraudulent charges, merchants that don't deliver etc.
    Thanks for the tip. Seems like the way to go. Now, if I can just have you American Express card # ....
  85. Best Lie can be useful by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

    I would never buy electronics or anything expensive there, but Best Lie is a pretty good store for music and movies. At least around here they have the best selection and decent prices. Only Circuit City is lower, but their selection is rather poor.

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
  86. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by secolactico · · Score: 1

    2) I only use my American Express (AMEX). I can't tell you how many times AMEX has helped with fraudulent charges, merchants that don't deliver etc. AMEX is expensive and a pain in the ass for mechants to sign up. If they are not willing to do that, than I won't buy. I will pay a slight premium for sights that take AMEX. It's worth it.

    Somehow I was under the impression that the opposite was true. I think it's because I believed that Visa and MC have to go thru a bank and Amex you deal with the institution itself (I know next to nothing of the "behind the scenes" of financial institutions so feel free to correct me). So if a company was in financial trouble, the first sign would be that their bank would cut them off credit cards transactions.

    Myself, I'm paranoid when it comes to buying online. I won't buy anything over $50 (incl shipping) from someplace I don't know. And even then, I use an "e-card" (one-shot credit card number issued by my bank on demand).

    My policy is, if it's too good to be true, it isn't. And if I'm buying a $2000 camera, and the savings I'm getting from a potentialy sady vendor (compared to, say, Amazon) is only $300, I'd rather pay extra or go to a "brick and mortar" store.

    --
    No sig
  87. Not limited to the internet by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    One of my teachers in high school did some moonlighting as a limo driver -- he said that most of the places do business as a few different names, to give them better odds when someone's going through the phone book and randomly picking one. (this was probably ~15 years ago)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  88. Call the manufacturer!! by tsmithnj · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently purchased a Canon digital camera. I called the tech support line and asked for a recommendation. They sent me to a reputable reseller.

  89. Consumer Reports, not Enthusiast Reports by cryptor3 · · Score: 1

    Consumer Reports gives these reports for those who don't have time to mess around with their computer. Dell, and Compaq/HP have service plans for their computers. They also have a known reliability record (unlike some of the smaller Taiwanese retailers). Sure, their service departments might not always be that great and they might be in India, but it's better than nothing.

    "Best Buy" in consumer reports does not mean "Best Deal". It means lowest-risk-of-hassle deal, that gets the job done, at a reasonable price point.

    Sure, I could go and build your own car and get a great deal and a lot of horsepower out of it, but I'm sure as hell not going to do that, because I don't have time to mess with that. I need to get from point A to point B reasonably fast, and in under a couple grand. And I want someone to be there if my car craps out.

  90. Do you want to know why? by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    The reason he was discouraging you from buying the 20D is because he didn't stock them. He probably had XT's in stock.

    The other thing to note is a 20D isn't a "professional" camera because of its 24mm sensor. Its a fantastic camera, but the new 5D is geared at the professional because of its sensor size.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  91. reply to sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a funny sig.
    If only there weren't people dumb enough to think that it actually means something.

  92. Crazy Eddies "language" by mekkab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's a real world example of electronic store employees speaking in code.

    The setup up paints it as racism, but its good ol' NY paranoia. Who do we trust? NOBODY.

    /and for the record, his prices were insane

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  93. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 1
    Never buy your electronics from front stores in the New York City area.

    I'm afraid this is a bit like Sturgeon's law for camera stores -- of course 90% of the bad dealers in in NYC -- 90% of all the dealers are in NYC. Unfortunately, buying from dealers elsewhere doesn't really seem to raise your percentages much (if at all). Just for an obvious example, one particularly notorious scammer operated (still operates?) out of Washington or Oregon, if memory serves. At the same time, two thirds of the reputable dealers are New York.

    In the end, it's all pretty simple: KEH, B&H and Adorama are about the only online camera stores worth considering. Of course, most online electronics/computer stores have at least some camera equipment, and if they're good otherwise, they'll probably do a perfectly fine job of shipping cameras as well. Just keep in mind that to them it's basically just a box -- as long as you're shopping the web page and don't expect them to supply you with any advice, they're fine. If you want to talk to a salesperson and get decent advice about what you should buy, you just about need to talk to a dedicated photography store (though dpreview.com, photo.net, etc. might be more useful, especially if you've narrowed things down so you want real detail on a few candidates, not just general guidance based on the kinds of pictures you usually take). If you drop by Photo.net after reading this, you're morally obliged to look at My Portofolio there. :-)

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
  94. Re:PriceWatch by friedmud · · Score: 2

    "Remember, most of the sites like pricewatch simply spider member sites for prices."

    No... not true at all... the reason I have always used Pricewatch is that they _don't_ spider sites... each item listed on pricewatch is entered _by the the company providing the product_.

    This makes pricewatch stand apart because the price that is on the website is actually the advertised price from the companies selling things.... so if they try to give you a different price when you actually order, you have some ground to stand on.

    I have personally had a lot of good luck with pricewatch... but I haven't bought anything directly off there in over a year now... why? Well... mostly because I found Newegg. Sure newegg doesn't always have the _absolute_ lowest price (by a couple of bucks usually)... but their service (holy turnaround and shipping time!) and reputation more than makes up for it. I would rather pay $10 and get good shipping and know that my credit card wasn't stolen.... but maybe that's just me ;-)

    Friedmud

  95. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  96. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally someone reads TFA...

  97. RTFA (or even the summary) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad you had good experiences, but if you bothered to check out the article summary for the story instead of just blindly clicking and commenting (a rather unfortunate plague here on /.) you would see that many of these fraudulent/shady companies are able to garner high ratings.

    As in one famous case, PriceRitePhoto basically used extortion, holding people's refunds hostage if they left bad reviews and other various tricks to get good reviews.

  98. Re:It's pretty easy to identify the unscrupulous.. by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, don't knock lesbianteenelectronics.com They may sometimes sell products as new that are in fact slightly used, but I've found that pictures already on the memory card more than make up for it.

  99. Economist's thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sorry but lack of full information constitutes a market failure. [In non economophonics that means that free market assumptions are not given to hold, err, it means the g-parent was right about this.]

    If you are really interested there is plenty of informational economic theory out there.

    It is actually one of the central excuses for why stores don't actually sell things at "P=MC" [price = marginal cost].

    Imagine that there are 15 stores selling the same thing (old school, no internet) and they are spaced an average of 5 miles apart. The cost of driving from store to store (gas, your time, etc.) all contribute to 'search costs.' In fact the order in which you go from store to store effects how much it will costs you at any given store to buy the thing. This all breaks down to the fact that we make a decision at some point (and you know it is true) to stop looking and just buy the damn thing... Search costs are not needed when perfect information is already available, and hence stores can charge that much more than marginal cost for a product. There are actual mathmatical models of such things, but I would imagine most can catch the drift. [Consequently someone offering you a list of what those 3 stores charged for the item would have a value to you also...]

    This whole Internet 'thing' really is a war over search costs ;)

    BTW Tinfoil/Think to make you go "Hmm..." - Maybe having effective ranking/rating/pricing sites is not exactly a top-priority for the smart businessman... Mis-information raises those search costs...

    1. Re:Economist's thoughts by dada21 · · Score: 1

      If you are really interested there is plenty of informational economic theory out there.

      I'm not. I've been in business for 18 years: retail, communications, IT, ISP, writing/publishing and public speaking.

      There are two laws for businesses to follow to succeed in the long run: 1. provide what the customer wants at a reasonable price, in a reasonable time frame and with reasonable service, and 2. watch you cash flow so you can outlive anyone offering only "best price" with "best product" and "best service."

      5 out of 7 of my businesses succeeded because I followed these rules. 2 of 7 failed because I broke these rules. I've interviewed hundreds of businessowners who succeeded and failed and they all fit within these rules.

      Megacorps differ slightly as they have the laws on their sides. For every 1 law you think you can use in your favor, they have 100 laws to protect them. Going to court is not going to fix the situation (it will make lawyers wealthy though!). The only thing that fixes the situation is to let people know you are unhappy -- even if it is just 10 or 20 people close to you. No company that screws the little man stays in business long, unless they are propped up with government funding or are able to be a monopoly due to licensing or restrictive entry to business through excessive government bureaucracy.

      Wal*Mart could not decide to just raise prices one day, or sell boxes of loose parts, or perform any true negative business practices. If they did, they'd go the way of Zayre, Venture, Silo, the old K-Mart, or any of the thousands of medium sized businesses that go under once they start screwing their customers.

  100. buyer beware by birarai · · Score: 1

    I've noticed this trend also in recent months. I stick to the larger e-tailers like buy.com, amazon, etc... Most of the customer reviews are real. birarai

  101. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by alnjmshntr · · Score: 1

    1) only buy from reputable sites. this has been going on since computer shopper days. its even more true today.

    That's sortof the crux of the matter. How do you know who is reputable on the net (besides say amazon). You look at reviews...

    --
    If I had created the world I wouldn't have messed about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers
  102. Have you ever read Consumer Reports? by Maxmin · · Score: 1

    If you've ever read Consumer Reports you'd know that it's not "consumers" who are doing the testing. Please re-mod the parent as 'Funny'.

    --
    O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
    1. Re:Have you ever read Consumer Reports? by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      It's not consumers. But it's also not experts. Which can be good or bad depending on your perspective. For example, the car magazines rate cars based on things like handling, drivability, etc. But Consumer Reports is the one that will tell you how the car acts in day to day life. For example, aspects such as grocery handling capability, ease of using the features aren't covered by the car magazines. And CR is the only magazine that ever told me how possible it is to but a car seat in the front seat of certain 2-seater cars. Car and Driver will review the top 2-seaters and tell you which is the best car from their perspective. But only CR told me that it is impossible to put a car seat in certain cars--an aspect of extreme importance to those with children.

  103. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with Consumer reports is that the reports and reviews are not written by experts. They are written by consumers, who have no idea what the hell they're dealing with.

    Admit you just made that up and have no idea what you are talking about.

  104. B&H Photo or Adorama ! by acomj · · Score: 1

    This is actually very informative. I've ordered from both of these retailer multiple times. No problems, no high pressure phone calls. Prices are very good (although not as quite as good as the "too good to be true" stores.)

    As the other reply says, you can go to B&H and watch the show. The store has conveyor belts and boxes moving purchased goods around.

  105. I had to correct my Jewish boss about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for a Jewish lawyer. In a memo or message I used the word "shyster" (not accusing anyone; IIRC it was something like "How do we find out if Mr. ________ is onto something or is just a shyster?"). My boss told me (politely, he's a nice guy) that he was uncomfortable with the term and indicated he thought the term drived from Shylock. That didn't seem right to me, so I looked it up and discovered what the parent post points out. I reported that to my boss. He was ok with the situation, and was glad he'd learned something.

    1. Re:I had to correct my Jewish boss about this by dfjunior · · Score: 1

      Good thing you didn't call him a niggardly shyster...

  106. British Drive By argument al la Family Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh Reginald...

    I DISAGREE!

    _Squealing tires_

  107. Best Buy by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    You really should have called or written to their corporate HQ about that.

    That's the second thing I've heard recently about Best Buy managers being totally out of line. I think that their district or regional managers are definitely cutting the store managers too much slack, or not giving them enough oversight. The thing I heard more recently was some very shift practices regarding xBox360 "bundles" -- they were advertising the straight-up price for the console in the flyers, but if you went into the store, the employees had been instructed not to sell them except as part of bundles with many expensive, high-profit add-ons. Eventually people got annoyed enough that they called corporate, which said that the 'bundles only' thing was BS (as they should, since it amounts to false advertising and creation of a clear bait-and-switch). However some people still ran into problems when they tried to return all the bundled add-ons; some stores were refusing the returns.

    Here's an Inquirer article about it, I think I originally heard about it from my local (dead tree) paper:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28056

    The thing smacks to me of some store managers basically going rogue and violating company policy in order to get their numbers up by the end of the year. I've talked to some people at BB and they have sales goals for high-margin stuff (especially service plans / extended warranties) and add-ons, and they thought this would be a great way to stick people for them. However the corporate side is guilty also, for creating the incentive structure that's so warped in the first place. How about some oversight?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  108. Best way to get a good deal by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best way I have found to get a good deal on a digital camera is to go out to a camera shop with a bundle of crisp pound notes. Speak to a sales assistant. Handle a few cameras. Ask if the assistant has tried them {why are they working in a camera shop if they don't love taking photographs?} What do they feel like in your hand? Note the layout of the controls, and check that your fingers are not going to get in the way of the lens -- or any of the other sensors like the auto-focus or the light meter. Does your shutter finger keep finding the on-off switch by mistake? *cough*FujiFilm*cough* How long does it take to store the picture and recharge the flash? Look at some test shots, or even better take some yourself. See if you can get a discount for cash, or something chucked in {another memory card, a multi-slot reader, free prints .....} And if the store staff don't treat you like you pay their wages, then don't pay their wages.

    There's still no substitute for real, live shops with real, live people in them. If you don't believe me, I have some very inexpensive 8 megapixel cameras you may want to buy ..... NB no penguin-shaggers please, these ones only do 2MPx without the special closed-source Windows driver.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Best way to get a good deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone who uses ^ when they mean ** is obviously a BASIC programmer.

      What if someone uses {} when they mean ()? What are they obviously in that case?
    2. Re:Best way to get a good deal by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      A romantic.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  109. Welcome to yesterday by itdood · · Score: 1

    This has been going on a for a few years now. Most of the shops work out of New York/Northen New Jersey.

  110. I'll disaggree by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    No, I think you'll find that there actually are more scams.

    I don't know if there are more scammers, though I wouldn't be surprised. See Penny Arcade's "Greater Fuckwad Theory". IIRC it went like, Normal Person + Anonymity + Captive Audience = Fuckwad. I'm guessing even psychopaths, which is what most of these scammers and spammers are, would be a lot more discrete in dealing with their RL neighbours than when they're hidden behind the Internet identity of "Mrs Ouije Ngbendu, the widdow of the former Nigerian minister of finances" or in this case "John Doe, world-class photography expert, reviewer of digital cameras." Or they'd find themselves ostracized very very quickly.

    This anonymity lends itself to all sorts of scams, including web-fronts pretending to be a different company, when in fact they aren't, or reviewing your own products under a different name. Having a different disposable identity has become very very cheap for a change. While before you _could_ buy the local newspaper to ensure they always recommend your stuff and publish your own reviews under a pseudonym, or even start your own newspaper, now you only need a colocated server and a domain name.

    Being able to have 1000 different identities also adds even more possibilities there, and I don't just mean being the widdow of 1000 different former Nigerian ministers. It creates opportunities like being a one-man astroturf operation (see the JBoss fuckwits back in that astro-turfing affair, where seemingly 100 different persons from all over the world rose to denigrate or shout down anyone who dared mention any problem) or write 1000 different glowing reviews of your own products on 100 "independent" sites, all owned by yourself. I remember at least one case where the fuckwit didn't even bother changing the theme or anything: it was literally the same site under at least 20 different names, all linking to each other, to drive the Google rank way up. (At least back then, it worked.)

    It's not just a problem of quantity as such, as in being able to do the same scam 1000 times over, it becomes a problem of quality: one person can create enough noise to drown all useful signal. Think about it. IRL you could try nagging someone to buy model X instead of model Y, but in their mind it will still register as 1 person's opinion. If 10 other people tell them otherwise, it's 10 opinions against 1. Here it's possible to appear like 1000 independent consumers like you recommending product X, shifting the opinion ration to 1000 to 10. While technically it's not a new scam, as companies have been known before to hire a lot of people to spread glowing testimonials, now it's cheaper and more efficient than ever.

    So I'd be really surprised if these opportunities haven't attracted more scammers than before.

    But, yes, the second half of the equation is that now it's possible to scam thousands of people at the same time. While a stereotypical wild-west snakeoil peddler could sell that crap to maybe half a dozen, or let's say a dozen, people before cautiously skipping town, now you can peddle H3RB4L V14GR4 to 100,000,000 people in one spam run. If only 1 in 1000 fall for it, you've scammed more people in one night than a wild-west snake-oil peddler could have in a _lifetime_. And if you manage to get a fake review site to be popular enough, you may even strike gold in a bigger way than with spam.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  111. Good for BH by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    You know, I can't help but notice that whenever some big negative story comes up, there's always a few companies who come out the better from it due to the good press they receive. When everybody is griping about scammers, and people praise your company (BH in this case) it can really do wonders for your image.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  112. Possible explanation for #7 by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    7. "Order confirmation doesn't constitute a final offer or contract. All orders are subject to management review and approval and if found to be invalid due to any reason, are subject to cancellation by management." -- Royal Camera website (similar on some others)

    I remember when it was fairly common for online stores to trust the clients. They'd send you an order form showing "item X" for "price Y", and when you submitted it, it'd take the price from the value in the web form. A lot of people would edit the HTML to reflect "price Z", and get a $500.00 product for $0.75.

    At least one court ruled that this was legal. In effect, the client was making an offer to buy item X for price Z, and the vendor's automated purchasing system was accepting their offer. It wasn't the client's fault that the purchasing system was phenomenally naive and would accept any offer thrown at it.

    So, that clause may well have been in self-defense. Their intent might be along the lines of "we have the right to manually confirm that your order is for the amount that we legitimately offered it for". I might be completely off-base, but that seems fairly likely.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  113. OT Re:PriceRitePhoto = Bad / BestBuy = Nice ? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    So, does that make you a Nazi Nazi?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:OT Re:PriceRitePhoto = Bad / BestBuy = Nice ? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Or possibly a meta-Nazi.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:OT Re:PriceRitePhoto = Bad / BestBuy = Nice ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely that should be über-Nazi then?

  114. it's so true by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    i ordered a macro lens from this place online and got one of these:

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/ 12/1725209&tid=222&tid=126

  115. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can an adult get far enough in life to get an Amex but still can't spell THEN or SITE? I mean, WEB SIGHT?!?!??? WWWAAAAAAAARRGGRGRHHH!!

  116. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by achacha · · Score: 1

    Out of my 3 major credit cards I use AMEX about 90% of the time and 100% online. They are best at handling fraud charges or merchants that do not deliver and as you mentioned it costs more for a merchant to process AMEX and more difficult to get it set up. If a merchant goes through that little trouble then it is a merchant that cares a little about the customer. I have noticed that lots of run-by-night places only use Visa/MC because Visa/MC have turned the blind eye on 3rd party clearing houses that provide checkout services to retailers.

    Amex also has least hidden charges, I have been enrolled into some dining plan by my Visa card when I just hung up on a telemarketer pushing the package and Mastercard signed me up for a "protection" racket (I mean plan) when I told a telemarketer to stop bothering me. Ultimately I called both Visa and MC provider and asked them to reduce my cradit limit to 1k each so that even if they do screw up it won't be for anything too major. I wish I could just cancel them both but there are places that don't take Amex (mostly small retailers).

    And don't get me started on American Airlines Visa I used to have... I gathered 130,000 miles on it and I can't find any viable tickets, every flight I try to get is either 3 connections or last row that doesn't recline next to the toilets. When I pay cash suddenly I get direct flights with seating in the middle to front and even window seats.

    At least Amex miles let me use it to buy concert tickets from Ticketmaster... a tangible reward without hassles :)

  117. Too late... by anandamide · · Score: 1

    The Mob saw your posting and put a hit on their server!

  118. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

    I just set up an amex merchant account - of course the paperwork isn't here with me right now. I believe the rate was 3.5% compared to appx 2% for mc/visa. On $1k purchases that starts to add up. However its a competitive advantage for me since most of my competitors don't take it.

    The other big difference is how payment is handled. With visa/mc, the money goes into your account quickly - within a couple of days. With amex, the money doesn't go into your account until the customer pays his bill. So if there is a dispute, amex doesn't have to do a chargeback as they have never handed out any cash, whereas visa/mc have to do a chargeback and do more work to do so.

    --
    The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  119. Re:No, it just means unscrupuolus lawyer. Or shitt by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

    ...Shylock, the Jewish lawyer from Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice.

    Shylock was a money lender, not a lawyer. A shylock usually means a userer, someone who lends money at an excessive rate interest rate.

  120. Same with some dialup ISPs by __aaijsn7246 · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I spent 2 weeks in the Outer Banks, NC. Naturally there was to be lots of lovely sun, ocean, beach, canoing.. But that could not deter me from logging into the Internet to check Slashdot! So I had to find a dialup ISP to take for a month so I could have access. I shopped around and found about a dozen, which all seemed very close as far as pricing and services. But, strangely, when I clicked (yes clicked.. no more lynx anymore) the subscribe links, I was always brought to a page which looked like the other pages! The domains weren't the same, and the layout of the page wasn't exact - but it was much more similar than any of the home pages had been. What gave the trick away completely though, was that the terms of service was exactly the same! And when I looked deeper, I found that they were all owned by the same company. Very strange yes. Amazing the lengths people will go to in order to let customers think they are getting a choice. But then again, it is just good business I suppose.

    Oh, in the end I subscribed to AOL for a month. I would be ashamed to admit this but I promptly canceled them upon returning and paid $0. :) I hate to say it, but: THANKS AOL!

  121. BUT by thepotoo · · Score: 1
    Look, I know what you're saying. And no, if you know something about what you want, then consumer reports isn't the place to go. As you pointed out, a good example is computers.
    But, if you don't know anything about something, consumer reports is great. A month ago, I needed a new refrigerator. I did a couple google searches, came up with nothing, and looked in consumer reports. Bang. I got a great machine that I'm quite happy with (now, how long it will last?).

    Many people don't know jack about cars, and CS is a great place to start looking. For the most part the reviews are unbiased.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    1. Re:BUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is going to be a mostly useless comment because my details are shaky, but here goes anyhow... I was trying to use CR about 10 yrs ago when I got my first car. I ditched it after I realized they were dinging the American cars for things like window switch placement and glossing over things like barely or non-functioning features on the Japanese vehicles. The shaky part is that I can't give you any real details. But the realization was enough to make an impression that I've kept with me.

      Part II is that my mother was a faithful subscriber to CR for years. When I was looking for the afore-mentioned car, I asked her if she still got it. She said no and then proceeded to list off 8 or 10 things she bought based on CR recommendation that turned out to be junk (although I don't think any of them were cars).

      So, no, I'm going to have to disagree. CR is good for parrot cages and that's about it.

  122. New York Based Online Retailers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mostly thieves. New York is the melting pot of Trailer Trash. What more can you expect from them?

  123. Racist posters by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    There are no references to "the N word" in the first page of Google results for "nigar" (but there is a sometimes photogenic Pakistani actress). I'm sick of PC radicals who leap at the chance to point out fictional offenses. Is "jewelry" verboten? What about "dike"? Spic And Span?

    It must be miserable living in a world where every thought and deed has a covert double-meaning. Why do you want to live there?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  124. Not just cameras and auto parts. by doublem · · Score: 1

    I used to work in "Distance Learning" for the Securities and Insurance industries. The company sold continuing education and licensing study courseware that you took online.

    I knew of a number of different URLS and web sites the company used to sell the exact same product. Prices varied wildly between sites. One of the sites had a name chosen to confuse people into thinking they were dealing with the people who administered the SAT.

    At a lot of firms, the company would pay for their reps' courseware, while at others the reps were required to pay for it themselves. What astounded me was how many insurance and securities firms would turn this into a profit center. All the reps would be required to get their C. E. through the company branded site. The kicker, was that the prices they paid were 10% to 50% higher than what an individual would pay using one of the other web sites.

    Why would Monolith Insurance (Not a real customer name) have their reps pay so much more? Simple, Monolith Insurance would be pocketing the extra fees.

    In house, the sales reps referred to it as the "Profit center financial university."

    One day, one of the sales reps showed me a competitor's online exams. I noticed that the competitor was conducting exams illegally. They were selling to New York Insurance reps, but breaking New York's rules for Insurance Continuing Education exams.

    When I told the sales rep that I was going to report the competitor to appropriate authorities, I got chewed a new one. Seems the sales rep worked for both companies.

    So, I dutifully listened to the lecture, and waited a full three days before filing an anonymous complaint. I'm a loyal employee, until some asshat asks me to break the law or "forget" to report a violation of the law.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  125. So you *didn't* know what you wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I was annoyed 'cause I was absolutely sure that I knew what I wanted "

    You were more annoyed because you hadn't researched correctly and were swayed by a clerk in a camera store. That's okay, but you really *didn't* do your research.

    For example, when talking about the Rebel XT versus the 20D, the salient points are:

    1) The XT is smaller than the 20D, making it better for people with small hands, but worse for people with big hands or for people who need to balance bigger lenses.

    2) Both are not full-frame sensors (but despite common belief, the two use different sensors). However, both can use EF-S mount.

    3) The 20D has a magnesium body, making it significantly more rugged.

    4) The 20D has more available options

    5) The 20D is a faster camera in the sense that it turns on faster and it has a higher frame rate. The 20D has slightly better extreme low-light capabilities, but not enough to make it a decision point.

    6) The 20D's controls are significantly better and more intuitive primarily because of the increased size of the camera body. It allows better controls.

    The 20D is a somewhat better camera than, the problem is, Canon has priced it significantly more expensive than the XT making the decision a tough one. I tell most people who just want an SLR to get the XT because for their purposes the two are essentially the same.

    There.

    I got all of that info from the internet in 4 days of research without having set foot in a camera store. In fact, if you go into a camera store, they will get important facts about each camera wrong, because they typically aren't well versed in a single model.

    If you're spending $1500 on a camera, presumably *you* knew all of that before you set foot in the camera store. I bought the 20D, because I'm tired of plastic bodied cameras. And that alone made the difference.

    I bought it at Amazon BTW.

  126. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either Adorama is that good or this site is full of astroturfers.

  127. For the record... by earlylate · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. I submitted this site because thousands of camera buyers are victimized every year. Slashdot members, being more web-savvy than average, may be more aware and thus less susceptible. And less surprised at the site's information.
    2. The word "shyster" was nowhere in my submission.
    3. Many members send in links to promote commercial sites. The site I submitted is more or less a public service.
    4. DANGEROUS GROUND alert! Perhaps slashdot should examine whether the shopping comparison site it is allied with is one of those that allows itself to be used by the villains we've been discussing. (Look up your favorite digital camera, and see what dealers show up near the top of the list with clusters of rave reviews.)

  128. Real culture? by Loundry · · Score: 1

    Depends how you define "total failure". Personally I rate art and culture over the Big Mac and SUVs. YMMV.

    What a poorly-conceived dig against the USA! Perhaps reflexive America-bashing is a "cool" thing to do in the culture you live in, but there are several aspects of it that deserve attention.

    1. The Big Mac is part of American culture. Sure, I don't eat them, but millions of non-Americans do. If they were such crap, and the cultures you think are superior are so superior, then why do those cultures not reject Big Macs as the crap that you perceive them as? Are those cultures incapable of understanding your refined tastes?

    2. Are you trying to claim that the United States has "no culture"? This is a common and retarded canard. Of course the United States has a culture! In fact, it has many, many cultures as you might expect a country of 300 million people and millions of square miles of land to contain. Do you think the cultures of Seattle, New Orleans, New York City, Lubbock, San Franciso, San Diego are all equal(ly crap)?

    3. The USA isn't the only country that drives or makes SUVs.

    4. The USA has artists too. In fact, they're so good that the government forces individuals to pay them!

    5. Do you admire the cultures of Saudi Arabia and Iran? Many Euro-elitists can endlessly bash the machiavellian evil of Biggie Fries, but they can't seem to generate the energy to criticize the *hideously* anti-woman, anti-gay, and anti-democracy record of more than one middle eastern country.

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  129. You misunderstand racism by Loundry · · Score: 1

    Mod me down if you must, but the inference that two 'foreigners' at different stores were in cahoots against the shopper - only evidenced by one's use of a walkie-talkie and a language the shopper didn't understand - smacks of racism.

    Racism is the belief that one's own race is inherently superior to another's race. (Or that another's race is inherently inferior to one's on race.)

    I don't believe in races. I believe in one race: the human race. The belief in "separate races" is a cultural belief, not a scientific belief, and is the core of all racist beliefs. If you read my words as saying, "If you believe in separate races, then you are a racist", then you read me correctly.

    That said, I see nothing racist in the parent poster's words or actions. Perhaps it was bigoted, but not racist. Perhaps the actions of the shopkeepers were also bigoted. Hard to tell from the average /. troll post. ;)

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
    1. Re:You misunderstand racism by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      All apologies that I used one word instead of another. Racism, bigotry, prejudice - they're all very similar. Please pick whatever word you like and substitute it.

      I certainly did not intend to troll, then or now, but I am fairly certain I know what racism is. I do understand a bit of curiosity when one store clerk talks to an unknown person through a walkie-talkie while the customer is unable to hear or understand. However, the poster's careful specification that both of the store clerks he spoke to appeared to be Indian, and the immediate presumption that the second was talking to the first, and the further presumption that the talking was sneaky and to the detriment of the customer, is racist.

      Had the poster eliminated mention of race or nationality from the post entirely, I would argue that the post wouldn't carry any weight whatsoever. So a store clerk talked into a walkie-talkie to get a price check? So what? But that post got modded up as Interesting; maybe it was interesting because it speaks of how easy it is to presuppose a stranger's intention using race or nationality as evidence.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  130. Once you know... by Kylere · · Score: 2, Informative

    Once you know, you Newegg. If you must use online places other than Newegg, I agree entirely with earlier posters who mentioned resellerratings. Oh and BTW never trust the ratings on Pricewatch, they are always stacked, even Target PC Inc is rated well there, and they are so far from reliable that they almost made me stop shopping online.

  131. A horrible quote by Loundry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    only because of the fact that there is a sucker born every minute.

    This is a horrible quote.

    It's a quote that was born from the realization that someone could take advantage of a trusting public on a mass scale. In other words, someone could easily make money through fraud using the trust of an inexperienced public as the lube, so to speak.

    This means that the public likely hasn't encountered an asshole as big as the person saying, "There's a sucker born every minute." The notion of calling them "suckers" is a way of making it seem like they *deserve* to be defrauded. Have you had "friends" who thought it was smart/funny/cool to take advantage of your trust? Do you have a high opinion of a human who wants to make a *career* of that skill?

    To me, the fact that the quote exists and isn't derided in the same way that we deride "Let them eat cake" is a sign of degeneracy in our culture. Yes, that's a value-judgement-charged statement, and I make no apology for it. We all have to stand somewhere, and I think fraud (and especially the notion that some people deserve to be defrauded) sucks to high hell.

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  132. No Humidity! by wsanders · · Score: 1

    And no mosquitoes either (I live in the SF Bay Area.)

    I'll gladly suffer through a certain amount of PC bulls*** to avoid those. Although my patience does wear thin from time to time.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  133. Re:PriceWatch by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    Not exactly so:

    For many items, everything works out fine, but for things like barebones computers: They may return something for a search like "Socket 939, windows" that has a different configuration when you click on it... Something like, the price goes up when you use the drop-down configuration box to choose that motherboard in the box.

    Also, I have had some experience (albiet not recent) when going to the store (Sometimes you need it NOW) and having the end store play games.

    Some places are great, others not so much. But the site gives you a good starting point. And they do show NewEgg in the results: so you know what the good service price is...

  134. timely shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The shipping companies are fairly consistent in their delivery, but asking for overnight mail doesn't really help you if the merchant doesn't get the item to the shipping company the same day.

  135. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Calumet Photo.

  136. Another positive review for beachcamera.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was looking on the web for some Sony equipment (the black projector screen) and found many places selling it at list of $1999, but some discounted down to as much as $1314. I searched on those sites with "scam" in the search and quickly learned to avoid them. But I saw no such issue for beachcamera.com and the price was $1399 plus $200 shipping (truck) so I bit the bullet and risked it. When my screen arrived damaged I was very worried, but when I called the guy he said he'd have it picked up and another one shipped out, and it arrived a few days later without issue.

    So there are a few NY area places that aren't run by crooks, but from the sounds of things they are few and far between!

  137. Qualifying for AmEx by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    *blink* You have to get far in life? Dude, they were practically handing them out on the street while I was in college. Admittedly, it was a "student version" of the credit card, but it was easily obtained. I had one for a while, but preferred the performance of Discover. *shrug* Then again, I'm probably an atypical credit card user. I buy almost everything on my credit card, but I pay off my full balance every month. Therefore, the percentage rates don't matter to me; what matters is a lack of fees. Getting (admittedly miniscule) cash back is just icing on the cake.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  138. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

    Indeed you have gotten a competitive advantage. As a general rule I prefer online sites that take American Express. While I still have my MasterCard for the absolute something that can be only done on Mastercard (for example, my favorite grocery store Trader Joe's does not take Amex and is probably my only complaint about Trader Joe's). A store with Amex on their list of cards taken A) Is more likely to get purchases and B) Is more likely to get bigger purchases from me. Think about that retailers...

    --
    ...in bed
  139. Amazon by JasonY1982 · · Score: 1

    Amazon might not be the cheapest in relation to other online retailers, but it is significantly less expensive than stores like Best Buy. Not to mention Amazon is very reputable. I complained to them once on Dec 23rd that my order had not arrived yet (electronics) and they said they would overnight it to me....sure enough I had it the next day. Sometimes the peace in mind that you know you won't be hassled and will get your merchandise is worth the extra dollars it costs on Amazon.

    Most sites that gotapex.com provides are good places to buy from and have good deals. However, always do your research before you buy from a retailer for the first time.

  140. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by James+Renken · · Score: 1

    I used to accept AmEx, and had some very bad experiences with them. They would regularly send me incorrect letters, including sensitive data intended for other merchants, and outright refused on at least three occasions to warn cardholders whose data had been compromised and used for fraudulent orders.

    They do not necessarily always withhold funds from the merchant until the cardholder has paid. Disputed charges were taken back out of my bank account, just like Visa/MasterCard's process.

    This was all back in 1999, so YMMV, but I still refuse to use or accept AmEx.

  141. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Speaking of AMEX, techbargains.com mentioned their Starwood pricematching program, and that it explicitly would not pricematch "Abes of Maine, A&M Photo World, Adorama, Beach Camera, Broadway Photo, Calumet, CCI Camera City Inc, Digital Liquidators, J&K Cameras, Newtonville Camera, Royal Camera, The cameras source, Tri-state camera, Unique Photo." AMEX's list is probably a good one to keep tabs on...

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  142. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the fuck was that a troll? CR does lean to the left. Good, bad, or otherwise, that's pretty much generally accepted. Is it too much to ask that they keep their politics out of their product reviews?

  143. Epinions and the like by nuntius · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I haven't bought enough online to know whether what I do "works" or is "just lucky".

    That said, here's my system:
    - Look for reviews about the product and the store separately
    - For each type of review, read (a) glowing reviews, (b) average reviews, and (c) negative reviews
    - For glowing reviews, ignore "me too"s and look for actual substance which might distinguish between vendors. Why were people happy?
    - Give average reviews a little more weight; look for general trends of what people expect
    - Give negative reviews the most weight; they seem to be the most honest. Why were people unhappy? Do they have valid points, or do they seem unreasonable?

    In the end, reading online reviews is an exercise in human nature. Some people will cheat for or against; others have no perspective on reality and distort average to being awesome or horrible. Your job is to identify the reviews that are trustable; these usually contain details not found in glossy ads; they are usually plentiful, if a bit hard to find.

  144. I think you still misunderstand racism by Loundry · · Score: 1

    However, the poster's careful specification that both of the store clerks he spoke to appeared to be Indian, and the immediate presumption that the second was talking to the first, and the further presumption that the talking was sneaky and to the detriment of the customer, is racist.

    How did the parent poster's action indicate that he

    A. believed in separate races

    B. believed that his own race was superior to another race

    ?

    Please explain. You claim to know what "racism" is, but I don't believe you yet.

    And, no, racism, is NOT equivalent to bigotry. Bigotry does not imply a belief in separate races -- much less a belief that one's own race is inherently superior to another.

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
    1. Re:I think you still misunderstand racism by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      Racism
      "2 : racial prejudice or discrimination"
      Includes the words "prejudice" and "discrimination" to define the word.

      Bigot
      "a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices"
      Includes the word "prejudices" to define the word. You are correct that, by definition that "bigotry" does not necessarily include race as a prerequisite. Neither is race excluded. Bigot is defined elsewhere as "One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ."

      Prejudice
      "c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics"
      Includes the word "race" to define the word. Prejudice is also described as "Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular group, race, or religion."

      Discrimination
      "b : prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action, or treatment [racial discrimination]"
      Includes the words "prejudiced" and "prejudicial," and the phrase "racial discrimination" to define the word. Discrimination is described elsewhere as "Treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit; partiality or prejudice: racial discrimination; discrimination against foreigners."

      Based on the above, my statement that those words are fairly similar (in this context) stands.

      If the original poster did not have any racial prejudice, racial bias, whatever you want to call it, then why specify that both store clerks apppeared to be Indian? If race was not a concern, that piece of information would have no value. I contend that race is not a concern, therefore that piece of information does not have any value.

      I'm not saying that it's impossible or even necessarily (I know I used that word before) improbable that the two store clerks in question were trying to pull a fast one. What I am saying is that implying that their race or nationality is evidence that they were trying to pull a fast one is wrong, no matter what word you want to use to describe that. That the post was modded up Interesting is interesting in itself. Ignoring the information about the apparent race of the store clerks', the post seems written by someone who's a bit paranoid. That's not intersting; that's just tinfoil hat.

      I know myself, and I know that when I was younger I was a Common Middle-Class Racist(tm). Somewhere along the way, I became aware that that is wrong, and since then I have made efforts to notice prejudices in myself and correct them. I know that I am from from being finished with that, and I fear that at my age, I may never be.

      When I read the original post, the phrase "appeared to be Indian" jumped out at me. It's mild, off-the-cuff, minor, and still wrong. Everyone wants to split hairs about whether it's racist or bigoted or prejudiced, but that's completely tangential to what I intended to say.

      What I intended to say is that it's wrong. There, I've said it. Split that hair.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  145. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just purchased a Nikon 18-70mm and a Tokina 12-24mm lens. These were through Amazon and fulfilled very very quickly by OneCall.com. I'm fairly trusting of Amazon, and the people they use. I'd never heard of OnceCall, but literally, the lenses arrived within 16 hours, admittedly via expensive FedEx overnight.

    Just a data point. Usual disclaimers.

  146. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

    Duh. And how exactly is one to know if a sight [sic] is reputable, or even if a SITE is?

  147. Re:Lots of scams out there...yes but... by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Having worked in various levels of the retail industry, I can tell you that one day not so far in the future, that Amex might be near-useless except for airfare and high-markup items such as furniture and appliances.

    It's not just that Amex is expensive and a PITA for the retailer, they're also grossly uncompetitive and irresponsible. You just can't win against Amex when you're the retailer. Walk into my store, buy 2,000$ of techno-crap, I'll make a copy of your drivers' license. 30 days later you call Amex and make up a story, they refund the money and you keep the goods. I send Amex my copy of your ID, proof that you were physically in my store, along with a complete listing of what you bought including serial numbers. 75% of the time Amex will still reverse the charge and you essentially stole my goods. Retailer stops accepting Amex and lives happily ever after. Their thinking is that it is far more profitable for them to keep you as an interest-paying customer than to respect my business and the painful lengths I take to cover my ass.

    Even better, I had a friend who worked in a gas station back in our college days. He had people doing chargebacks on gas, saying it wasn't their vehicle! I forget the numbers but it was something like 20 Amex to 1 Visa because Visa is obviously smart enough to know gasoline is non-refundable. You pump it, you drive off and you use it, it's gone! I mean seriously, If I had a stolen CC, the first thing I'd do is fill up my tank instead of ordering a pallet of laptops :P Amex is retarded and eventually they will run out of retailers to screw.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  148. Re:The lesson? Don't buy in New York City, period. by nbvb · · Score: 1

    No, they're "that good".

    I have no affiliation with them, just some very happy camera & telescope purchases. Myself, friends and family.

  149. Small Claims by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1
    Dude, if it wasn't too long ago, you can still sue.

    As I would guess that the party you have a problem with is in another state/commonwealth, you need to decide where to sue. Stores often have terms of agreements which attempt to limit disputes to the courts of their choosing, or often, to arbitration. On the Internet, these are usually not binding unless you were forced to click through them in agreement. If the pages you interacted with only had reference to a terms of agreement, with link perhaps, it is likely not binding on you. Just research one or two cases which agree with this point in case you need them when in court.

    Small claims courts cost less than $100 to sue. D.C., iirc, costs $30 to file. There will likely be other costs, especially if you use the court to mail the process (see below), but all of it should be recoverable if you win.

    One thing that may be important, research the company you dealt with on your state/commonwealth's secretary of state site to determine if they registered as doing business - if so, there should be at least one individual listed as a contact. Check also for the state/commonwealth in which they are located. Include these individuals, if any, in your suit. The idea being, if the person dissolves the company after your suit, you can follow him/her individually without resuing.

    Filing is the easy part. Next comes the service of process (giving a copy of the complaint to the party you're suing) which can be difficult. There are generally different ways to do this - (1) by hand to the person sued, (2) by hand to someone at the residence of the person sued, (3) by attaching it to the door of the residence of the person sued, (4) by mail. The rules of the court in which you sued will tell you which ways are possible. You can't generally do it yourself in person, since you're a party. Courts also generally have restrictions on who else can deliver the process, such as they have to live or work in the court's jurisdiction.

    Further, the court may require that you attempt service according to a certain heirarchy (first in person, then to residence, then by mail, etc.), but there may be a 'curing statute' such as in VA where service of process, even if not done by following the heirarchy, is ok if the person sued actually got notice. If it turns out that you are suing somebody out of state/commonwealth and require hand service, there are people who do this for a living (and will take pictures of their doing it for proof).

    Once you have good service, you can go to trial. If the party you sued is a scammer, he/she won't likely show up, especially if you're in another state/commonwealth. In this case, so long as you have some evidence (e.g. copy of your purchase confirmation and your testimony that the item didn't come), you will win. U.S. courts are very tough on enforcing contracts and a sales agreement is a contract even if there is no writing involved.

    When you have a judgement in your state/commonwealth, you then need to get it enforced. If the other person lives elsewhere, you have to sue again there to get the judgement transferred. The good thing is that they can usually no longer dispute anything that occurred in the first suit since they had notice and thus, opportunity to dispute it earlier. You will get a judgement, and can get an order to the sheriff to enforce it.

    This would likely be a pain, if your location and the party sued is far apart. One option might be to sell the judgement, such as to a collection firm. You won't get even close to full value, but should be better off than if you hadn't sued.

    It would be cool if /.ers would form a network and help each other out in such cases for a cut of the judgement. Really, these scammers operate on the principle that most people will drop the issue as too time-consuming and expensive, and most do. The more people who don't, the more likelihood that read damage is done to the scammers and they may go away.

    I am not a