Slashdot Mirror


Trauma Pill Might Help Ease Emotional Pain

FrenchyinOntario writes "Canada's Globe & Mail is reporting that scientists are currently testing a 'trauma pill' that might help the victims of rape, the battlefield and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) forget or perhaps simply never store the memories of what happened to them the way they are stored normally immediately after the traumatic event, when the brain overloads itself with stress hormones. It's theorized that the pills could eventually be handed out to victims of Katrina-like disasters as well as returning war veterans. Critics wonder what kind of an effect it would have on a victim not to work through the pain like people have traditionally done."

488 comments

  1. Eternal Sunshine? by montyzooooma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could do with a really big dose of this to blot out the last decade or so.

    1. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually they have already made this. Been around for years, comes in a bottle which I highly recommend to all my friends. Called Jack Daniels.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    2. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny

      A pill that wipes out memories of trauma? If only this had been available after "Episode I: Attack of the Clones."

    3. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like exactly the dosage needed to wipe out my memory of learning about the pill itself.

    4. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by EntropyEngine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This kind of thing really pisses me off.

      I have to wonder where we're going when people just want a pill for every ill instead of just dealing with it.

      So annoyed have I been with this topic over the years, I felt compelled to 'blog about it...

    5. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by robolemon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Episode I: Attack of the Clones?

      You must have watched a different Star Wars than I did.

      --

      I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

    6. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This kind of post really pisses me off.

      I have to wonder where we're going when people just post blog entries instead of just posting usefully afresh.

      So annoyed have I been with this over the months, I felt compelled to comment about it...

    7. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Exactly the idea I presume. I guess alcohol and drugs are not working well enough. After Katrina, those poor people still seem to be complaining.

    8. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anpheus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A pill to cure cancer? Pshaw!
      A pill to end HIV/AIDS? Hah!
      A pill to stop famine? Pfft!

      Parent, don't make me laugh. It would be miraculous if we could have a 'pill for every ill.'

    9. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then you would have just gone back to see it again the next day.

    10. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I bet that's why it did so well in at the Box Office - they probably handed out free test versions of these pills after.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless you have been raped yourself, I dont think you should make comments like that. Some things are incredibly difficult to 'just deal with' - and why should anyone have to deal with even the idea of being raped? It's sickening.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by EntropyEngine · · Score: 0, Troll

      What an excellent point!

      Why don't I just re-write was written right in the first place, yes?. Err, no! Let's not.

      Don't I know you from somewhere?

      No, of course not. You're just like every other idiot with an issue.

      Maybe it's 'coz I got good wi' words, and you're not, eh?

      Move along, son. There's nothing for you here...

    13. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by ppz003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right... Because nothing bad ever happens in the world and everyone should be in complete bliss at all times. Won't someone, PLEASE, think of the damn children.

      Uhg.

    14. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by RackinFrackin · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's what you asked for last week.

    15. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      get a clue - this isn't about not wanting to have bad memories, it's about not having to live with PTSD and constant flashbacks.

      it's about stopping a kind of emotional cancer, not about making you happy.

    16. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by EntropyEngine · · Score: 2

      That's probably not the most accurate generalisation...

    17. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by somersault · · Score: 1

      and when you say 'fantasize' do you mean in a happy way? Maybe some people are weird enough to do that, but for most it would not be a pleasant experience. I didnt say nobody thinks about it. I said they shouldnt have to if the world were a perfect place; but unfortunately it isn't, and never will be.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't get high and mighty about it. This drug is more useful to rapists than it is to victims. Welcome to Roofie mark II.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    19. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Other studies found that 51 percent of women fantasized about being forced to have sex, while a third imagined: "I'm a slave who must obey a man's every wish."

      story

      --
      -gjr
    20. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what do you mean 'high and mighty', I'm just saying what I think. And I didnt say that it's good that there's a pill to stop people suffering, I just found it sickening that the guy thinks it's so easy to 'deal with' everything when clearly some things can really mess you up beyond the point that you can cope with it yourself.

      Anyway this isnt a total memory loss pill, this is more like an anti-depressant. It's not going to help rapists to get away with it - if it simply dulls pain then surely it would be easier to identify the assailant from memory, rather than your brain trying to disassosciate itself and forgetting the details?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    21. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by ehrichweiss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you "just deal with" recurring nightmares, waking up in a cold sweat no less than 5 times a week, flashbacks, feelings of impending doom, or wanting to smash someone's head in if they make loud sudden noises even if they're just children playing, and many other completely uncontrollable events? Even worse, if you're like me and you don't even discover you have PTSD until 12 years after the event and "just dealing with it" isn't an option any more...how do you cope? If you're such an advanced psychologist that you can make one of these seemingly half-witted, oversimplistic Dr. Phil-esque statements, then please tell me how you "just deal with it" cause I'll be happy to let you go through what I went through, which since it wasn't rape or war it is easily reproduced, to prove your point. Skip that, let someone rape you.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    22. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still a douchebag. Get used to it, you traffic whore.

      "I blogged aboit it! Yay!" No one gives a fuck.

    23. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Son? Oh, are we roleplaying? Cool!

      Yeah daddy, suck my cock, ooh yeah... now put it in my ass, oh daddy!

    24. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I doubt it will catch on unless people can take the pill after they start suffering the symptoms. (Unless of course the military mandates its use by soldiers).

      I guess I've just lived a priveliged life, but I've never experienced something so bad I'd rather be kept in the dark about it. But I don't have PTSD, so I won't judge those who do.

    25. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I have a clue. Sometime life can be a royal pain and some people may need help to get through it. But don't try to tell me that a pill like this won't be abused by people with money to fix any little thing that may not go their way.

      For every wonderful thing mankind dreams up to make lives better, three more abuse it.

      and please try to recognize a little sarcasm without the tags.

    26. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That explains the relative success of Episode II and III as well...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    27. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      I read about this a while ago in New Scientist. you should understand that it doesn't affect your memory, just the emotion associated with that memory. if I remember correctly the initial trial was giving it to rape victims. you wouldn't forget the fact that you were raped or stop being unhappy about it, the memory would simply not be so strong that you would be unable to live a normal life.

      the pill is a one off and is best taken straight after the event so I don't see why it couldn't be standard practice to offer it. it can be given later after the event under the right conditions.

    28. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by someguyfromdenmark · · Score: 0
      "Called Jack Daniels."
      Glad to see you've got a nice someone to talk to.. I have someone too, her name is Mary Jane.. I'm meetin' her in the park at twenty past four tomorrow, if you'd like to come along we could all hang out and watch cartoons and share laughs and whatnot to get over the pain of wait, what was I talking about just now?
      --
      I change my sig often.
    29. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by halltk1983 · · Score: 0
      FTFS: "forget or perhaps simply never store the memories of what happened to them the way they are stored normally immediately after the traumatic event"
      Sounds to me like they are MADE for you to forget. Now the rapist can rape you, then force a piull down your throat, and you'd wonder why you were in an alley with your pants down around your ankles.
      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    30. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *rolls eyes*

      "simply never store the memories of what happened to them the way they are stored normally immediately after the traumatic event"

      they'd still know why. They just wouldnt be quite so upset.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    31. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was obvious that this pill was just a dampener even from the main link, but if you want proof FTA: "The important thing to know about this drug is it doesn't put a hole in their memory. It doesn't create amnesia." eg they will still be able to testify in court as to the identity of an attacker, and so forth.

      I'd think there would be much more effective ways of concealing your identity than giving someone a pill after - spiking the drink of a victim beforehand etc.. if this pill effectively blocked complete memory formation then you'd have more of a case.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    32. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      Hrmm... looks like I was wrong. Apologies... Though I wonder if the person would press charges if they weren't upset?

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    33. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a horrible '05. Worse year of my life. My Uncle Jack, whose company others here seem to quite enjoy as well, was a great friend during this troubled time.

      Good ol' Uncle Jack, always so understanding and compassionate!

    34. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are many pills to stop famine. Cyanide works admirably well.

      A pill to keep you from having to deal with bad things in your life? Cyanide works there too...

    35. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      No, he just took a little pill...

    36. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Back in my heavy drinking (i.e. student) days I used to swear by taking the occasional massive bender. Think of it as a brain reset. Works just like rebooting your PC or degaussing your monitor.

    37. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming


      There's probably never been a story where your .sig is more appropriate.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    38. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Though I wonder if the person would press charges if they weren't upset?

      I'll tell you a compulsory market for this - the army. Standard issue for anyone likely to kill someone, conduct an interrogation or anything else where they might sick or ashamed at what they've done.

      I think detaching the readout from the meter is a bad idea.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    39. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      Everything has suddenly become really really dark. Did you just turn the monitor off?

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    40. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by burndive · · Score: 1

      Cyanide.
      Cyanide.
      Cyanide.

      I don't see a downside.

      Seriously though, what's the point of this pill? If we had had it in 1944, should we have given it to the Haulocost survivors? Should we give it to rape victems and tell them to just forget it ever happened? Should we have handed it out in America on Sept 12, 2001? What's the point of being alive if you never have to deal with anything? Should John McCain have taken this pill after he got out of torturous prison camp in Vietnam?

      How will you grow? How will you find out that you are strong? Oh, that's right: you won't.

      Come to think of it, the French might want these.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    41. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man up, Nancy.

    42. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POKE 646,0

    43. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by andreMA · · Score: 1
      I'd hope that - before routine use in such cases - it would become established fact (and settled law) that the administration of this drug to rape victims doesn't "taint" their eyewitness testimony in the way that hypnosis is seen to by the courts. I think that was the concern expressed by the other poster.

      Depending on the timeframe in which the drug needs to be given to be effective, perhaps doing much of the investigative interviewing beforehand would reduce/eliminate the defense argument that the victim testimony is unreliable because of the drug. Especially police sketches of the perpetrator based on victim memories and descriptions of distinctive features, clothing, etc.

    44. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't yet looked into it, I'd suggest EMDR. A friend of mine with chronic PTSD as a result of child sexual abuse swears by it.

    45. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 1

      You've hit the nail on the head with the major problem with this pill. More rapists would be walking around free. Rapists might even come to see it as their right to rape, and the victim just takes a pill to forget all about it.

    46. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by MojoTripper · · Score: 1

      > Welcome to Roofie mark II. "It's not rape if she doesn't care!"

    47. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      I read the article and some related material. The purpose of the pill is not to wipe memories; the purpose of the pill is to lessen the impact of the traumatic memory, which for many reasons seems to be stored more strongly in human memory than ordinary kind. A rape victim would remember being raped or a soldier would remember combat, but the pill would make the memory less traumatic, less crippling, and lessen the effects of PTSD and affective disorders.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    48. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by burndive · · Score: 1

      Yes, that was my understanding of this pills effects when I wrote my comment. This pill enables people to more easily shurg off horrible things. If something horrible happened to me, I would not want a pill to dampen its emotional effects. My point is that painful situations make us realize things. They make us stand up for our rights, demand justice, and shout, "Never again will this happen!"

      Were it not for Haulocost survivors, there would be no Museum of Tolerance, in fact, we might not hate hate the way we do at all. There may never have been a Civil Rights Movement in the United States. John McCain was tortured in Vietnam, and because of that experience he is outraged at the idea that America would torture anyone. September 11th gave the United States the balls to go to Afganistan and take out the Taliban.

      If we could just shrug off things that would otherwise haunt us, we would be much more likely to not want to deal with them. A rape victem might want to repress the memory of her experience, pretend it didn't happen, and go on with her previous conception of a nicer world, but it would be better for her (and humanity in general, not to mention justice) if she got over her denial, accepted the fact that it happened to her, and then live her life and face its decisions accordingly. This pill might help her to not have to repress the memory, but it will be at the cost of being as strong as she needs to be in the real world.

      "Wouldn't it be nice if this never happened" is not a healthy line of thinkning. This pill facilitates that, and for that reason, I don't like it.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    49. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by somersault · · Score: 1

      they dont forget all about it! RTFA! If this is going to cause problems in court then it would be a bad thing; but it should be down to the individual concerned - reduce their own pain and let someone walk free, or suffer for the rest of their life but have the rapist behind bars.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    50. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by andreMA · · Score: 1
      I agree that - even if it reduced the chance of conviction - it's the right of the victim to deal with the trauma as they see fit. Their first responsibility is to themselves.

      While I agree that it doesn't suppress memories so much as alter the impact of them (and possibly the internal encoding in the brain) I do see the potential for it to be used to the advantage of the perpetrator.

      Short personal anectdote:
      I suffered from comparatively mild acute PTSD following a serious traffic accident, where I hit a dark blue vehicle stopped across the road at night with neither lights nor reflectors visible to me. For weeks afterwards, simply seeing a similar shade of blue caused me moderate anxiety and I had intrusive memories/flashbacks (hallucinations, maybe - fleeting images of shattered glass stained with blood overlying my visual field).

      In my case, there wasn't a question of identifying the guilty party, but if there had been - and this drug had been given to me, my recollection of the color might be called into question - even by the police, if they felt the drug made my recollection unreliable.

      Yeah, this doesn't analogize well... and by no means am I equating my mild trauma (cuts, bruises, cracked ribs and a totaled vehicle) with that experienced by a rape victim. But I do have a small first-hand experience in at least some aspects of PTSD - fortunately self-limited in my case; it resolved spontaneously over a month or two.

    51. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by wheany · · Score: 1
      From the Article on sexual fantasies in mens health magazine:

      None of this means, of course, that real-world rape victims "really want it." "Women who find submission fantasies sexually arousing are very clear that they have no wish to be raped in reality," say Leitenberg and Henning. In their fantasies, women control every aspect of what occurs. And their scenarios are far less brutal than real-life attacks. Typically the fantasy involves an attractive man whose restraint is simply overwhelmed by the woman's attractiveness. These fantasies serve the same psychological purpose as scenes of irresistibility. "It's different means to the same end" says Leitenberg. "We want to be desired."
    52. Re:Eternal Sunshine? by somersault · · Score: 1

      exactly - that doesnt seem so much a rape to me since the woman wants it. I thought the definition of rape would be forced sex where it wasnt desired. As it says there the scenarios aren't brutal also. There's a big difference between wanting to be raped, and having a fantasy about sex with some guy you think is hot o_0

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. It'll Turn 'Em by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Into walking timebombs - waiting to go off back at home.

    Wonderful.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by ls+-la · · Score: 1

      The trauma already turns them into walking time bombs. It can't make them much worse.

    2. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Because they let it

      Of all the species on this planet, only man receives more damage by wounds that do not physically impair him.

    3. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I agree. How wonderfull.

      Now we can order the troops to do a My Lai every day and they will have no regrets, will not feel moral repercussions and their conscioiusness will not eat them at night for lining up innocent civilians against the wall.

      Do not understand me wrong, I am all for treating people for actual post-traumatic stress disorder, but somehow I have this gut feeling that is not what this drug will be used for. And I do not want to be anywhere near a person whose "magic pill" has suddenly stopped working.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by permaculture · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's almost as if this could be used for evil, as well as good.

      What's science today coming to?

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    5. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by coolcold · · Score: 1

      I may be abit pessimistic but the more useful a thing is, the more it will be used in the evil.

      Say, what would happen if the rapist fed the pill to the victim? What would it be like if the government "forced" you to forget something with this?

      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
    6. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Now we can order the troops to do a My Lai every day and they will have no regrets

      Reminiscent of the quite excellent movie Jacob's Ladder.

      But I think Lt Calley and his troops were likely suffering from PTSD already. Perhaps such a treatment would make atrocities less likely. In TFA, the army was unenthused by the idea, saying it would "curb survival instincts" (make them less aggressive, I think that means).

    7. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      The troops didn't seem to have any regrets, that was the problem. It was only the outsiders (friends and others who didn't participate) that eventually spread the story. Later many said they felt very bad, but I wonder if it was more because they had to say it because they were being watched by whole country now.

    8. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by JustOK · · Score: 1

      ya got any proof of that?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    9. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      Ya got any proof that he don't?

      --
      Sig
    10. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Of all the species on this planet, only man receives more damage by wounds that do not physically impair him.

      Other "higher" animals experience similar psychological issues. The great apes, dolphins, elephants, etc.

      Mealworms don't get depressed simply because they can't realize that the world sucks.

    11. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. A few respectible institutions have done lots of research into mental difficulties in animals due to trauma.

    12. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by QMO · · Score: 1

      I've seen a traumatized dog.
      It was very weird.
      It was a medium-sized dog, in good health, but obviously terrified of anyone other than its owner. This dog was not just wary or careful, but terrified of strangers.
      It was so obvious and so severe that it kind of freaked me out
      The owner said the the dog had improved a lot from when she first got it.

      (Yes, it is known that the first owner had been very abusive.)

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    13. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more Manchurian Candidate

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    14. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by somersault · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along the same lines. The grandparent was trying to make a deep comment. Most people who are physically healthy suffer a lot more from mental problems - but then again you could have had your legs blown off and still manage to be 'happy'.

      In a way he's right though - unless you're in constant pain with arthritis or something, then I guess it is fair to say that you're far more likely to be suffering mentally.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by acid_zebra · · Score: 1

      ooh, nice snark. (truly no sarcasm intended)

      --
      -- No Sig is a Good Sig
    16. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by conureman · · Score: 1

      As part of the court order for custody of my kid, I have been ordered to undergo psychological evaluation, the suggestion being that I need drugs to control my thought patterns. Quite a megillah leading up to this, but evidently my determination to "just deal with it" is wrong thinking. "I have seen the enemy, and he is us." -Walt Kelly

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    17. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      You can't prove a negative.

    18. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it won't turn people into walking time bombs.

      Soldiers -- for example -- won't be more likely to commit atrocities than they are now, but they will be more likely afterwards to return to society and say "hey, I was there, and we need to change things" instead of just drinking themselves to death, which is our current system. People who suffer terrible experiences are *already* walking time bombs. They *already* DON'T work through the experiences, but just repress them. They can't even process these experiences.

      The inability to process bad experiences leads to further and further negative behaviors for a lifetime. (This is the psychological reality behind the Buddhist idea of "karma", which falls on both the victim of a crime and the person who commits it.) More processing = higher consciousness = more responsibility = a better future.

    19. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by halltk1983 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. My father was in Vietnam. Three members came back from his group. He's the only one who lasted more than 6 months. But he coped. He dealt. He still wakes up at night, drenched in sweat. But if you offered him a pill to make him forget, I doubt very much he'd take it. That'd be a disgrace, and a dishonor to the men who fought beside him. If he can cope with what he went through, I think the other posters can live through having a bad hair day.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    20. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

      "...Okay, if I could have everyone's attention for a moment - If you could just look over here..." [Flashy thing goes off.]

      --Agent J, MIB.

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    21. Re:It'll Turn 'Em by E++99 · · Score: 1
      ...they will have no regrets, will not feel moral repercussions and their conscioiusness will not eat them at night for lining up...
      That may be the most mind-blowing image I've ever considered -- People being actually consumed by their own consciousness at night. The implications... I can't even fathom it. Maybe that's why people rot after they die, because their consciousness breaks free from their body, and then eats it! You probably meant "consciences," but this is much better!
  3. Bah... useless by lordsilence · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I want my mind-enhancing "remember everything you read" pills for studying.
    Exams in a couple of days dammit!

    1. Re:Bah... useless by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Nicotine has been shown to enhance memory recall and other mental stuff like that... but only when you're under the influence of nicotine.

      Since nicotine is a mild(?) stimulant, I'm not surprised at the finding. Same story with caffeine, Ritalin or Adderall (which are not so mild stimulants)

      My recommendation: Go with a Nicotine Patch.

      It's not illegal and it lasts longer than caffeine pills. The cravings are a different story though, since nicotine is by far the most addictive of the possible choices.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Bah... useless by PC-PHIX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I want my mind-enhancing "remember everything you read" pills for studying.

      I used to use a product called Exo Memory. Probably the same as this product which I just found online using Google, except I found mine by asking at my local Pharmacy here in Western Australia, so I never had to buy it online. (If you are from Perth, you might like to know that the Pharmacy up the road from U.W.A. in Nedlands is where I first saw this product).

      In any case, it seemed to do the trick. I could read a page of information and quote you anything I'd just seen. I was remembering phone numbers after reading them ONCE for days afterwards. People's names, lyrics from songs, locations of files. Cramming took on a whole new meaning during the time I was taking it because of the sheer speed with which I was storing new information and recalling it accurately. It was wonderful stuff!!!

      In moderation, I can't see the harm either... I am not responsible if it diagrees with you or vice versa, but I saw no side effects.

      --
      Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
    3. Re:Bah... useless by Vicsun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What you're looking for is adderall. Or any other sort of amphetamine, really - adderall is only preferred because it's legal and thus easier to obtain. Thousands of college students can't be wrong ;-)

    4. Re:Bah... useless by eMago · · Score: 1

      You will have to do this by some form of genetic engineering. Probably it's about the way crucial parts of the brain are organized and how they organise the information for storage. Just changinge the chemistry around the neurons wont be enough for this task.

      My father (a now emeritus physics professor) had the chance to meet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann back in the 50s. My father (having met many of the smartest people of the 20th century), told me von Neumann was by far the smartest person he has ever met. It is said that John von Neumann had the closest of an eidetic memory imaginable. He could have studied for standard college exams in a matter of hours - not to talk about the days you mentioned.

      So it IS possible. Some day we will engineer most of mankind to that level and beyond, however if we really use pills, those will probably reorganise the connections brain in a determined way. This is quite different from the methods mentioned in the article.

      --
      --- censored
    5. Re:Bah... useless by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

      Side effects?
      I wonder what would happen to someone who was taking it and got shown goatse...

    6. Re:Bah... useless by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      You can remember what you read better but you don't need a pill for it, but rather better learning skills.

      One thing that should be taught first in universities and schools is "how to learn", and then the specific topics for each subject. Sadly there is no such class, everyone is expected to figure it out on their own - "just read the damn book" or "here, memorize these formulas" is what most professors/teachers are basically saying. Granted, many will say that methods of learning are something that differ so much and everyone has their own style and so on. But still there are certain techniques that are known to work best and others don't. There is a lot of medical (brain) and psychological research about how the brain learns. So why not make every freshman take a required course where they will be taught some of these learning "tips and tricks".

      Here are a couple of things that helped me. I graduate with 3.9 GPA from a 4 year University, and I do think my learning style made a difference. Hope some of these will be helpful, I wish somenone had told me about them back in the day.:

      Summarize and take notes. This is the most important thing. Always keep the question in mind: "what is the main point or the key idea?". The best way to summarize is to take notes on what you are reading or on what you are listening in class. When you take notes, because it takes longer to write stuff, you are automatically forced to abbreviate words and concepts, so your brain is forced to condense a paragraph in only one sentece and you are forced to extract only the main idea. When you spend more time thinking about the idea, it also helps you memorize it better. A secondary benefit is that learning is re-enforced when you associate a gesture or a hand movement with it, in this case the actual tracing of the letters of the word with your pen are associated with the concept. When you write stuff, dictate to yourself in your head, so you associate an auditory sensation with it. The more stuff you associate with the new concept the easier will be for you to retrieve it. So write notes on what you are reading and then just study off of those notes. If you already wrote notes in class, then write a new set of notes that is even better organized and integrated with all the quizes, homeworks and text from the book.

      Make Mental Maps. Many believe that the mind will associate new stuff with stuff it already knows. So when you learn something new try to fit it in together with concepts that you already know well. So besides associating sensory perceptions with the concept, associate older concepts to it also. To do this I found it very helpful to draw concept maps or trees. So draw a node for each concept and an edge (a line) for a connection between two concepts. That is a much better way to organize some general knowledge than having it in form of pages and pages of text.

      Review-Rest-Review. It is true that you will remember better if you study (review) your materials a week or so before the exam. So take a break a couple of days (study something else) and then review them again. If you don't have a couple of days, then at least allow one full night sleep in between the two session of review. Also the second review should be mostly looking over the notes that you took during the first review. These notes should contains only the most important stuff from all the books, homeworks, class notes, quizes etc. -- all compiled in only one set of notes. Copying that stuff into a new set of notes will take time but it will help greatly to memorize it.

      But can you teach it?. To test how much you learned about the topic, try to teach it to someone else. If there is no-one around, pretend in your head that you are the teacher in front of the class and you have to teach the stuff. Could you do it? In other words, most people after reading over the chapters will just assume they know what is happening, just because they've read it X number of times.

      Formulas When having to memo

    7. Re:Bah... useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What side effects?

      Three minutes to Wapner. Definitely not wearing any underwear. Yeah. About a hundred dollars.

    8. Re:Bah... useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "remember everything you read" pills
      That reminds me of the song I Feel Fantastic (downloadable MP3 here).
      I get up early when the sleeping pill wakes me
      I take a wake up pill and fill with energy
      I power on hard and I check my messages
      But I don't have any messages
      I take a driving pill and head to my car
      I drive around a bit cuz work isn't very far
      I call my phone and I check my messages
      But I don't have any messages
      ...
      And I feel fantastic
      ...
    9. Re:Bah... useless by QMO · · Score: 1

      I know that was tongue-in-cheek, but "Thousands of college students can't be wrong" is kind of silly, as you can find thousands on each mutually exclusive side (meaning both sides can't be true) of many issues, including this one.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    10. Re:Bah... useless by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "In moderation, I can't see the harm either... I am not responsible if it diagrees with you or vice versa, but I saw no side effects."

      There are never any side effects with sugar pills, unless you believe that there should be ;)

    11. Re:Bah... useless by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      According to a lot of my college friends, Ritalin and Adderall (spelling?) will do just that. Conversely, if they wanted to think more creatively they would usually do a couple of bong hits.

      YMMV, Don't Try This At Home, etc., etc...

      Personally, I've found that getting enough sleep generally has the same effects you're describing. Note, I said enough - there's a fine line between not enough and too much. You probably want to walk that line for best results.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    12. Re:Bah... useless by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      Well, at least these will come in handy when you see your grades.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    13. Re:Bah... useless by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I can't help but remember what the Door Mouse said.

    14. Re:Bah... useless by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      It's real simple. If tramatic events more strongly mark themselves on your brain then all you have to do is make your learning ventures be similarly so. Go find some brutish looking woman named Helga, pay her $20 to dress in tight black leather and brandish a whip while quizing you on the material at hand. For each wrong answer provided mistress Helga gets to have her way with you. If you're lucky she might even do it for free!

      --Neth

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    15. Re:Bah... useless by zCyl · · Score: 1

      And you stopped taking it because ________

    16. Re:Bah... useless by PC-PHIX · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was only one reason: cost.

      My memory is pretty bloody good already. My data is fairly well organised too (in my phone, computer, customer database, accounting package, filing cabinet, diary, PDA etc. etc.).

      So normally, I don't need it. When I am working under pressure, studying or learning about something new and complicated and need the extra edge, I do still use it.

      With a new job/contract coming up where I'll be learning several new systems, I will probably go buy a couple of packets to help me memorise things until I have used them enough for them to be stored in my long term memory / become second nature like most of the other work I do.

      Put simply: At around $10 per week to be on the them continuously, $500+ p.a. is too much to pay. Therefore, I only buy them when an extra advantage is necessary. Exam time - as the original parent comment mentioned - for example.

      --
      Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
  4. not really a good idea by morbidi · · Score: 1, Funny

    for rape victims, anyway the pain in life is what makes you grow has a human bean, psicologicly and socialy.

    1. Re:not really a good idea by hazem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you saying rape victims should be forced to endure PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives - just because you think people should have traumatic experience to grow from?

      There's a big difference between struggling through difficult situations and thriving and being emtionally and psychologically damaged.

      Your logic leads me to believe that maybe we should have government-mandated rape in order to make sure everyone has maximum opportunity to grow as a human being. I hope that's not what you're saying.

    2. Re:not really a good idea by Mahou · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if we take away the emotional and psychological damage of rape, does that lighten the charge from rape to assault and battery?

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    3. Re:not really a good idea by PC-PHIX · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about a pill to help 'human beans' spell complicated words like 'psychologically' and 'socially'??

      --
      Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
    4. Re:not really a good idea by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      No, by all means take drugs, pierce yourself, wipe out memories on a whim.

      We're just that little voice of conscience saying: "hey! hey! I don't think is such a good idea!"

    5. Re:not really a good idea by hazem · · Score: 1

      if we take away the emotional and psychological damage of rape, does that lighten the charge from rape
      to assault and battery?


      Probably not. If I stab you with a knife trying to kill you, but only manage to land a minor flesh wound, I'd most likely be charged with attempted murder - not just simple assault.

      Your comment makes me think of the Turner Diaries.

    6. Re:not really a good idea by hazem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guess the way I see it, this pill is kind of like emergency first aid. It helps prevent permanent damage after a traumatic event. The memories are still there - the person is just more able to function after the fact.

      There's a medication that if given shortly after a stroke occurs can mitigat the permanent damage of the stroke. Should we withhold that medicine so people can experience the full effect of a stroke - and "grow as a person" as they try to overcome that damage? Or if I twist my ankle - should I not put ice on it, but rather experience the full possiblity of pain and suffering that can cause? The ice doesn't get rid of the consequences of whatever I did to twist my ankle - it still hurts - but icing it may reduce the swelling that can cause secondary damage that will take longer to heal. That's all we're talking about here.

    7. Re:not really a good idea by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Physical pain versus emotional pain.

      Physical pain hurts. Like, really bad. It also has a tendancy to be forgotten amazingly quickly after the event. By all means, hit up some morphine for that "Advance to GO" card if the experience has no redeeming qualities.

      Emotional pain? Well, if you don't remember what you did that caused it (cheated on your wife with a hooker and she finally dumped you), you're apt to repeat it.

    8. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not the OP, but I have one opinion to add...

      I'm a male survivor of rape when I was a child. There were many years that I wished there was some magic that would make it all go away, but standing where I'm standing now, I'm glad that pill did not exist. It's better to embrace your pain and be real about it, than to try to hide from it through drugs, dissociation, or anything else.

      Now I'm not saying I would actively oppose the administration of this drug, I definetly would not. But this is how I personally feel about it. I would not judge anyone who chose the pill, though I would see it as a choice between the red and blue pills.

    9. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One wonders how humanity managed to survive all those millenia without pills to block out "traumatic" emotions.

    10. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "By all means, hit up some morphine for that "Advance to GO" card if the experience has no redeeming qualities."

      Then the redeeming qualities in this case would be a morphine addiction. Oh yeah, hit me up with some of that stuff.

    11. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's al good, man, rellax

    12. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you just proved the point, if you stab me and give me a fatal wound but i'm saved, you are not charged with murder even if my heart stops beating from blood loss, because modern medicine 'makes me all better'. you're only charged with assualt with intent to kill or attempted murder or whatever. what set's rape apart from other types of physical abuse? is it merely the sexual nature of it; then what if someone gets off while hitting you in the face--is that rape? or is the deep psychological problems it causes the reason it is serarate from normal abuse?

    13. Re:not really a good idea by pookemon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should read the book Chickenhawk for an idea of what PTSD can do to a person. His (Robert Mason's) story is probably a mild case of it's affect - but how would you like your ex Vet airline pilot suddenly blacking out on approach?

      Or your rape victim cab driver, or surgeon.

      I think your stupid statement indicates you think PTSD is simply a case of "bad memories".

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    14. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go live in a straw hut with the natural order of things.

    15. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you Tom Cruise?

    16. Re:not really a good idea by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The majority of the basis of emotional pain is based upon pre concieved expectations about the trauma not only personal but also the interaction with other peoples expectations which can have an even greater influence. Also the contrast between the persons normal life and the actual physical severity of the incedent come into play. This drug seems to be about taking the emotional edge out of a bad memory for people who have difficulty coping with that memory. Although you have to consider how much influence the support of the medical team had upon the effectiveness of the drug, so there could be a range of drugs with similar properties when applied in that manner.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would probably, at one time, have said that a pill such as this was a very bad idea and backed up that thinking with the same type of reasoning as many people here have mentioned. A few years ago, however, I found out that a couple of people near and dear to me had been attacked. It seriously screwed them up for a very long time afterwards (5+ years at least). The problem was purely an emmotional one but it stopped these people from getting on with their lives. If a pill could take the edge off the memories without making the person actually forget what happend I think it's something to be welcomed.

      On a related note: it is often forgotten how much pain is caused to the relatives and friends of the person attacked. Certainly in my case I spent years looking after my partner with hundreds of sleepless nights while she relived events in her sleep. There is also a feeling of complete helplessness when the person who perpetrated the crime is able to walk aroudn scott free because the victim is too tramatized to go to the police.

    18. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Yup. There is no such thing as PTSD. Get used to it.

      2) If you have never struggled through a difficult situation you feel psychologically damaged every time someone passes you on the road.

      3) Govenment-mandated rape is called marriage (or prison!) You could do with growing as a human being. That's what I'm saying.

      Most animals, (including Americans) have a brain which learns. Part of that learning process involves feelings of happiness and revulsion. We all get the same range. How we apply it depends on how we live.

      If you go for a cossetted life, seeing mis-matched wallpaper is a mind-shattering experience. If you have survived in Ethiopia, watching your children die from hunger around you is no big deal. These extremes are perfectly understandable, but our society has people in it who make a living out of treating anyone who thinks they are out of the normal.

      Like everything, you want a happy medium, not a life free from concern.

    19. Re:not really a good idea by bri2000 · · Score: 1

      If you really believe that I suggest you do some research into what an "anger-excitation" rapist is and what they tend to do to their victims. You'll learn a lot of things you'll probably wish you hadn't but I suspect your views on appropriate treatment will change.

    20. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those who can't remember their past are doomed to repeate it."

    21. Re:not really a good idea by bfischer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Emotional pain? Well, if you don't remember what you did that caused it you're apt to repeat it.

      Yes, by all means, you should remember all the details of your rape or you will get raped again. This is not the same as if you are taking the pill because you have a stressful day or someone pissed you off. Being raped or held hostage or watching someone murder your family are things that can turn a person into a basket case for the rest of their life. If a pill can prevent this, then I say this is a good thing.

    22. Re:not really a good idea by ChaosCube · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Nobody forces rape victims to endure this or that. Shit just happens and we have to deal with it. It's well documented throughout all of human history. Denying that some horrible shit did not happen, when it actually did happen, is wholly unhealthy, whether the denial be from drugs, hypnosis, suicide, or whatever.

      And jumping to insane conclusions that someone is implying government-mandated rape programs would be a good idea is also quite unhealthy.

      --
      BDR Gear
      Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
    23. Re:not really a good idea by orasio · · Score: 1


      Emotional pain? Well, if you don't remember what you did that caused it (cheated on your wife with a hooker and she finally dumped you), you're apt to repeat it.


      In her case, it would be like: Note to self: don't marry an asshole again ???

    24. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emotional pain? Well, if you don't remember what you did that caused it (cheated on your wife with a hooker and she finally dumped you), you're apt to repeat it.


      In her case, it would be like: Note to self: don't marry an asshole again ???


      In the case of my wife, it would be "Gee, perhaps I should have had sex with my husband on our wedding night, and then not said a couple of months later ``we're married now, we don't have to do this all the time.''"

      Bitch would deserve it I got the clap from a hooker.

    25. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are examples of failures as human beings. if they can't get over it they should die quietly and save the world from listening to their overblown moaning.

      This is what happens when we let you pinko liberals survive - the Spartans had the right idea!

    26. Re:not really a good idea by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you saying rape victims should be forced to endure PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives -

      I think my experiences are a part of me, the good the bad and the ugly - they are there and even though they may hurt a lot I want them as a part of my life. I grow from these memories - I like my pain it makes me who I am today. If I could forget any bad part of my life - I would be a smaller person for it. Rape is a tragedy, but yet - it may help if the victim remembered what happend. Like for example "maybe i shouldn't walk on 10th and broad at 3 AM"...or more importantly, "the guy who attacked me looked like ....."

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    27. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should do some research on what pinko liberal brain-rot can do to a person. You won't learn anything, cos you're too far gone, but you can't say you haven't been warned.

    28. Re:not really a good idea by hcob$ · · Score: 1
      Are you saying rape victims should be forced to endure PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives - just because you think people should have traumatic experience to grow from?

      Sorry, I know you were trying to make a point... but next time, argue the point... Don't use a CLASSIC straw-man fallacy to sound caring and logical.

      The point is... memory erasure in general is bad. We are our memories. Our memories make us. However, in extreme cases(such as PTSD) there is a valid argument as to the use of such a pill. That being said, monitoring of "the pill"'s use should be strictly enforced so as to minimize abuse.
      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    29. Re:not really a good idea by Hosiah · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Are you saying rape victims should be forced to endure PTSD symptoms for the rest of their lives - just because you think people should have traumatic experience to grow from?

      I was already alarmed at this posting, but your question brought my concern into focus. Fine, let's say we do things your way. "Post-date-rape drugs", as they can be known, work like a morning-after pill so the rape victim suffers no emotional consequence whatsoever. They get accepted into our culture, become available over-the-counter. Some time passes. Pretty soon, some rapist in court gets off with the defense that they did nothing to their attacker that couldn't be fixed by popping a pill. Laws against rape begin to erode. Eventually, rape victims become younger and younger...it becomes a "normal" thing.

      Is this a better world than the one we had before? That's what worries me.

    30. Re:not really a good idea by AngelofDeath-02 · · Score: 1

      I guess the important thing that people are trying to say is Don't let this become an Apathy drug of sorts...

      Although I'm sure in my case I'd have had to take this for many numbers of years to get the effect ("emotional protection,") but I'm definately screwed up.

      Still, I wouldn't want this to be used for less and less severe cases of emotional trauma. Everything has the potential for abuse.

      Let's not forget the breakdown of society caused by people inflicting traumatic experiences for others because they have never experienced anything remotely traumatic, and know that that person will escape relatively unharmed due to the same treatment.

      Then there's the fact mind altering drugs can greatly assist in controlling a population - Think Brave New World.

      --
      No, I am not an English major. My posts are subject to typos and incorrect grammar. Do not expect perfection.
    31. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess... you've never taken an intro to psychology course before?

    32. Re:not really a good idea by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To play devil's advocate, attempted murder is a lesser charge than murder, so in that instance (at least) how bad off the victim is (regardless of your intent) is the deciding factor. Case in point.

    33. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking away others' memories is not necessarily a good thing. Many years later, parts of those memories can resurface, perhaps correctly, perhaps distorted. Either way, it will likely cause a whole new set of unknown/unexpected problems.

      People have a natural way to deal with difficult memories. They (especially if encouraged to) slowly think less and less of the traumatic event, but usually can recall it correctly if needed. If memories have been suppressed, they can come back bits at a time, with the mind attempting to make sense of it, which doesn't work out well.

    34. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, being educated is now considered too much to the left. Strange political trolls don't make any sense.

    35. Re:not really a good idea by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does this seem crazy to anybody else?

      A person who has an asthma attack while driving or suddenly faints for no apparent reason and runs over and kills 5 people is charged with 3rd-degree murder. They could end up in prison.

      A person who carefully plans the assassination of their next door neighbor but botches the job is charged with attempted murder. They could end up in prison, and it would depend to some degree on how successful they were.

      Clearly the second person is a danger to society. The first person might or might not be - and the harshest penalty really called for would be to deny them a driver's license if their condition were expected to recur. However, in our modern justice system the two crimes are not very different in penalty.

      In my mind, the apparent intentions of the criminal should be one of the most important criteria in sentencing. Punishing people whose only crime is being unlucky and giving an easy sentence to somebody whose only virtue is being lucky is completely at odds with the whole notion of justice and the protection of society...

      OK, I admit this was a bit off-topic, but it annoys me to no end to see these kinds of laws on the books...

    36. Re:not really a good idea by NiteShaed · · Score: 0

      The same way we survived without penicillin, air travel and XBOX 360s. Just because it hasn't been around since we first dropped out of the trees doesn't mean it's sinister.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    37. Re:not really a good idea by forgetmenot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you're reading too much into the original post - perhaps poorly stated in one line.

      Quite frankly I'm more afraid of a pill that helps you forget trauma than the trauma itself. We've made a lot of social progress since the days of the casual Viking Sack and rape have probably. Somehow I feel a lot of this was due to the desire of the traumatized to no longer be victimized, themselves or others.

      Painful or not - people being hurt leads to action to prevent it.

      Why spend millions on education and crime prevention and social progress when you can just give anyone who feels victimized a pill.

    38. Re:not really a good idea by ChaosCube · · Score: 1

      Actually, I majored in Psych for a couple of years before getting into an engineering program. But since you mentioned it, one of the basic tenants of psychology is that supressing memory and emotion is bad. Like I said, shit happens, and we have to deal with it. Thank you for your comment.

      --
      BDR Gear
      Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
    39. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a big difference between forcing someone to endure such things, and between simply not providing them a medicine to counteract it. Inaction is not using force, sorry.

    40. Re:not really a good idea by hazem · · Score: 1

      I don't think the idea of this pill is to make anyone forget anything. The idea is to keep the memory from being implanted in such a way so that the person is damaged an unable to function normally.

      The trauma is still there, the initial shock is still there. This is just helping to prevent secondary damage - and that damage may actually be worse than the initial shock.

      Why is it that people believe that damage/illness in the brain is so different than "physical" damage/illness. I think it's crazy to tell someone with severe depression, PTSD, or schizophrenia to just "get over it". We typically don't tell people with cancer and diabetes to "get over it" - we try to give them the best treatments possible so that they can live the best life possible.

      Why should it be any different in the mental-health arena? Why shouldn't we use every means available to minimize the damage that someone receives from a tramatic event?

      I'm sure someone will say that it's easy to fake something like depression so you can be a "victim", get out of work, and get happy-pills. But it's just as easy to fake a bad back, to be a "victim", get out of work, and get happy pills. Is it really so different?

    41. Re:not really a good idea by burndive · · Score: 1

      There are other approaches to avoid living in fear for the rest of your life. Chiefly among them is to rationally acknowledge the event, accept it for what it is (i.e., admit that it is real), and not let wreck havoc on your reality. I admit, many people are not capable of this. Many people have their realities tied up in the stability of their sheltered lives. In those cases, this pill might be advisable, but having said that, it is by far NOT the ideal situation. I think most people can see that there are some people who would be better off with a pill like this than without it. The problem is that it grates us the wrong way, because we believe people should live in the real world.

      Some people would want to take this pill after finding out how their dinner was killed.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    42. Re:not really a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The point is... memory erasure in general is bad. We are our memories. Our memories make us. However, in extreme cases(such as PTSD) there is a valid argument as to the use of such a pill. That being said, monitoring of "the pill"'s use should be strictly enforced so as to minimize abuse.


      Who says memory erasure is bad? You? I could give a damned what you think.

      Who will set the standards?

      I'm tired of judgemental dickheads like you dictating what is right for everybody else. While we "are our memories" self determination comes into play as to what we'd like to remember. If I hate you so badly that there's a way to blot you out, so be it.
    43. Re:not really a good idea by ao_coder · · Score: 1

      I personally wouldn't want to erase my memories of living through a school shooting, although they are pretty awful. Your rape analogy is a false choice between forgetting a traumatic event, and wishing a traumatic event on someone. I wouldn't dream of making that decision for someone else, but my life is mine to remember, the good and the bad.

      My concern is that by endorsing a memory erasure drug, we implicitly reduce the degree of criminality associated with inflicting trauma on one another. I'm concerned that people might start raping people more often, knowing that whatever harm they inflict can be magically erased the next day. Worse, I really that the effects of the drug are as simple as a one-memory wipe. I'd worry that using this drug would be a trauma in its' own right, and that potential criminals out there would hold themselves less accountable for their actions, telling themselves that whatever they were about to do would be forgotten anyway

      --
      The best lack all convictions, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. -Yeats, The Second Coming
    44. Re:not really a good idea by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      obviously you've never had bad neighbors.

    45. Re:not really a good idea by jonniesmokes · · Score: 1

      I think what the poster is saying is that if people forget trauma then the trauma doesn't really exist. If murderers forget their deeds, and their conscience doesn't know about their deeds, then won't they just do it over and over again. Conversly, won't society have less appreciation for the gravity of a crime if the victim can simply erase a crime from his or her memory. Like say I was mugged and suffered a few bruises. The mugging is mostly a trauma. It makes me scared to go out at night. But say this pill exists. Won't others (and law) be likely to think that muggings aren't so bad. After all, you could just forget it. Now apply the same logic to rape and you get the travesty that could ensue.

      I think I'll stick to the old fashioned bottle of booze. That way you only forget for as long as your drinking binze goes on.

  5. Society.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is obsessed with modifying humans to make them mold to the sensual numbness required to function in our society

    1. Re:Society.. by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      So why are all the best drugs for such purposes illegal?

  6. Do you want your memory altered? by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would you really want your memory erased with a pill? The emotional stress of a memory is just as important as the events. I guess it is true that ignorance is bliss, but I think the people in this community have chosen to forgo that bliss for the truth, that is in many cases harsh. This looks to me just like another way to escape reality. I can only speak with limited authority as I have never experienced something that I would consider absolutely horrible. I think however In the long run I would like to be able to remember. Why not just give them some heroin to ease their pain?

    Someone much smarter than me once said that we must remember the past so that we do not repeat it. Do we really want our soldiers to be able to just take a pill after a battle so that they will not remember? Wouldn't it be better if they remembered, suffered, and convinced people not to go to war in the future? There is nothing really in the article that says that the memories would be totally erased but messing with memory formation is pushing the limits what I want done to me.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    1. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by hazem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you really want your memory erased with a pill? The emotional stress of a memory is just as important as the events.

      The article is dumb by starting out with "make your forget" and then refutes itself by saying that's not what they're doing.

      The pill works to help keep the event from causing the kinds of connections that lead to PTSD. You still remember the event and its effects - it's just less likely to lead to PTSD.

      PTSD can be very debilitating and I don't think anyone should have to live through that. Soldiers won't come back with no memory of the terrible things they did. They just won't spend the rest of their lives diving for cover when a car backfires - or attacking their wife when they are startled in their sleep.

      Nobody lives a richer life because of PTSD. But with their memories of terrible things still intact, people will still be able to reflect, and work for change.

      Of course, rape victims will be made victims twice because they will not be able to both use this pill to prevent the psychological damage and be considered a reliable witness. Defense Lawyers will say, just as you have assumed, that her memories were changed and there's no way she could identify her attacker reliably. And gullible people on the jury will go for it. "We can give you this pill that will help you be whole, but you'll have to give up on having a solid prosecution against your attacker." What a choice. Ironically, I would imagine that by reducing the tramatic effect of the attack, the victims memories might actually be more reliable.

    2. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was in a serious car wreck years ago, but I don't remember a single thing about it.

      My memory of that night is this:

      Driving ---> entering hospital on a stretcher ---> being at home

      The doctor said I subconsciously blanked everything else out. The same type of thing happens to people who've undergone serious trauma/abuse.

      You don't have to have the memories intact for an event to leave a lasting impression upon you.

      I guess that for some people, the memory is emotionally charged, to the point that it creates mental health problems. However, I don't remember what happened to me, but the mere fact that I know it did happen is more than enough to have taught me my lesson.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by plate+of+felt · · Score: 1

      It seems like they've overlooked that many people can tell when there is something that they cannot remember.

      There are so many holes in my memory of my childhood that it is extremely disconcerting- and these are very minor things, like learning to read and taking five years of ballet (five years! And I don't remember a bit of it!) I know these things happened, yet I do not remember them. It makes me fearful of whatever else I also might not remember.

      Three weeks ago, I was drugged and raped. I remember every bit of it. Somehow, I was lucky enough to have the strength to deal with in the immediate. Others are not that lucky, and they have to deal with it at a later time, causing them many many problems along the way. My heart goes out to those suffering from PTSD. We do not need a pill to induce that suffering upon those who might have a chance to escape it.

    4. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Do we really want our soldiers to be able to just take a pill after a battle so that they will not remember? Wouldn't it be better if they remembered, suffered, and convinced people not to go to war in the future?

      "No, it wouldn't."
      -- Every Government In The World

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      "Would you really want your memory erased with a pill?"

      Well, ya. But what'd be cooler is if I can imprint random memories on me with a pill.

      - A Casual Technology Whore

    6. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by mincognito · · Score: 1

      This looks to me just like another way to escape reality.
      I appreciate your point, but would you deny a rape victim that option?

    7. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Would you really want your memory erased with a pill?"

      YES! I can think of something from my past I would rather not remember.

      "The emotional stress of a memory is just as important as the events."

      And what does this say of memories that serve little or no purpose other than to torment and haunt the person remembering them? I mean, using the example of someone suffering from PTST from Hurricane Katrina, why is it "important" to wake up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat to make sure the roof is still over your bed?

      "This looks to me just like another way to escape reality."

      Must "escaping reality" always be a bad thing? After all, that's why 99.9% of the people are posting here right now.

      "Why not just give them some heroin to ease their pain?"

      Obviously the high wears off, otherwise there'd be no money in pushing the stuff. Besides, in my case there's pretty much just that one thing I don't want to remember any more, I don't want to forget everything.

      "Do we really want our soldiers to be able to just take a pill after a battle so that they will not remember?"

      Who are you to make such a personal decision for them?

      "There is nothing really in the article that says that the memories would be totally erased but messing with memory formation is pushing the limits what I want done to me."

      Then I envy you for not having something you'd want to forget so badly. I'm not going to pretend I really have PTSD or went through anything like Katrina or war, but it's enough to leave me lying in bed awake at night with a self-induced stress headache, unable to stop clenching my fists, and there is simply no "life lesson" to be learned from what I'm remembering and zero relation to my present life. Some might suggest drinking it away, you filippantly suggested heroin, but I suspect if I were to try something like that I wouldn't stop. I've never touched anything harder than caffein, but I don't exactly relish choosing pain over substance abuse.

      Not everything about the human condition has nice, neat little logical ties between everything, or has some deeper meaning or important lesson to be valued; sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

    8. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      Imagine the amount of great literature and important lessons the world would be missing if we had this pill throughout history.

      There's nothing good about PTSD, but a great many of the most influential statements, art or otherwise, are a result of someones scarred past.

    9. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by flyingsquid · · Score: 1

      Philip K. Dick, "We Can Remember it For You Wholesale". They didn't use pills, but the idea was that you could pay to have positive memories implanted. Don't buy the vacation, buy the memory of the trip.

    10. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Elrond,+Duke+of+URL · · Score: 1

      Would you really want your memory erased with a pill? The emotional stress of a memory is just as important as the events. I guess it is true that ignorance is bliss, but I think the people in this community have chosen to forgo that bliss for the truth, that is in many cases harsh. This looks to me just like another way to escape reality. I can only speak with limited authority as I have never experienced something that I would consider absolutely horrible. I think however In the long run I would like to be able to remember. Why not just give them some heroin to ease their pain?

      Yes, there really are times when it is better to forget than remember. I've had more than enough surgery thus far in my life, and I can tell you that those short-term memory blanking drugs can work wonders. The first time I was given one was after a 9 (nine!) hour surgery. I had to be awake when they removed the breathing tube to make sure I would begin breathing on my own. But this is a very unpleasant experience and not one that needs to be remembered. On that occasion, because the drug did not work 100%, I still remember a few small fragments, but not much. And based on what I *do* remember, I'm glad to be unaware of the rest.

      The second time was for an outpatient upper endoscopy (camera down your throat). I got the drug again for that procedure. Worked like a charm. I remember lying down on the table, then I remember the nurse telling me it was over and I could sit up. Of course, as is the case with short-term memory blanking, those are the parts I remember... for all I know, she could have asked me to sit up five times before I finally remembered long enough to do it. But, again, this was a very appropriate situation to lose one's memory. Having a big camera in a tube down my throat is not something I'd like to play back in my mind later when I'm bored.

      --
      Elrond, Duke of URL
      "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood of my enemies!"-Sam&Max
    11. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      "Philip K. Dick, "We Can Remember it For You Wholesale". They didn't use pills, but the idea was that you could pay to have positive memories implanted. Don't buy the vacation, buy the memory of the trip."

      What they didn't tell you is you'll have to be putting out tracking chips through your nose afterwards.

    12. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by miller17 · · Score: 1

      As someone who has gone through Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and has personal experience with psychiatric pharmacology, I can say that this is a bad idea for multiple reasons.

      The majority of the harm that PTSD causes isn't because it isn't treatable, it's because it's not even diagnosed. I of course was aware of the condition when I went through my own trauma, but I never considered that it would ever apply to me. Instead, because there is such an inherant shame involved in victomhood, I chose to try to suppress my experience. Suppression did not work. Instead, it took a year and failing out of college before others picked up on that something was wrong.

      Now, after a couple years of therapy and some anti-depressants to fight depression that was a side effect of the untreated PTSD, I can say that I have at least some perspective on the condition. And I would not want to have taken a pill to simply lesson the memory. Once I finally recognized that I had a condition, I was able to go through a process to intellectually and emotionally understand the trauma. It took a lot of time, and help from others. But I've been able to use that experience as a point of passion and drive to prevent similiar things from happening to others. And I do not believe that a simple intellectual understanding would be enough to go through the inherant discomfort that comes with talking about trauma.

      Here is what I really fear about a pill though. It's that people will use the excuse of a pill to not really treat sufferers of PTSD. Or even worse, that those victoms will believe that just because they have taken some pill, that they do not need real treatment. There's already enough of a stigma for those who have gone through trauma, that they don't need the associated guilt that a pill should be enough. It's imperative that we talk about trauma, and truly appreciate it for what it is. There should be a drive for more talking about this condition, instead of a drive for a simple pill to "fix it".

      Trauma is part of being human. The last thing we need to be teaching people is that if you've gone through something bad that you should just take a pill and start from scratch. All memories, good and bad, are important for growth. And tramatic ones are arguably even more important, as it allows you to protect yourself for things happening again. This is why the brain reacts the way it does in making these memories stronger in general.

      So in conclusion, I would hope that we would put more effort into finding and diagnosing PTSD, instead looking for a wonder cure. Once people are finally told that they have this condition, they often can make efforts themselves to get better. It takes time, but with help and understanding it's very much possible.

    13. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by krysolid · · Score: 1


      Just as you "blocked out" your automobile accident trauma,
      some people in some situations obsess on their memories,
      which "burns" them in, and makes them pop back up every
      time something sets them off.

      I think this strategy is to suppress the repeated playing
      over and over and avoid the memory becoming so implanted
      and spread out that someone is paralyzed by these memories.

      It would not exactly be erasing one's memory, it is like
      turning down the record volume on a tape so that when you
      play it back it is just not so loud. There are certain
      situations where that might be useful, but I can understand
      it is an aesthetic call, I have certain things that I believe
      and would not take any medication of mess with because I
      just think it is the way I am supposed to be.

    14. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Mathinker · · Score: 1
      Your point about rape prosecution and this pill was what first hit me about the post. However, the pill might still be useful for the (probably small) minority of rape victims where the rapist has been caught almost immediately so the victim could make a statement and a line-up identification before taking the pill.

      Another low-probability situation where it could be useful is when the events of the rape were recorded faithfully enough by surveilance cameras that the personal testimony of the victim would only be to affirm that "it did happpen that way".

    15. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      PTSD can be very debilitating and I don't think anyone should have to live through that.

      I know a guy who used to be a bank teller, who was not robbed once, but *twice*.

      Since these event he is startled much more easily and strongly at loud "bang-like" noises (such as champagne cork popping...) than other people would...

    16. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I was in a less serious wreck a couple of years ago (no bodily harm, fortunately, but the car entirely destroyed). The days after I kept a very vivid and detailed memory of the few seconds before the accident (slippery road in a downhill curve...), and what I did to attempt to do to avoid it, the crash itself, the "am I now dead?" wondering, ... . It must have been mere seconds (or even less than a seconds), but memories made it seem much longer than that.

      Years after, of course, these detailed memories are gone (only a "summary" remains...), but for the days just after it was pretty impressive.

      You don't have to have the memories intact for an event to leave a lasting impression upon you.

      Oh, yes, since then I drive more carefully, especially on snowy/icy conditions...

    17. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Of course, rape victims will be made victims twice because they will not be able to both use this pill to prevent the psychological damage"

      I realize this will be taken wrong but an interesting fact is that a major contribution to the stress of rape victims plays the way rape is accepted in our culture. We're being told daily that rape is horrible, leaves you marked for life, and so on and so on.

      This is the point I don't want taken wrong: it's not as if I'm saying rape is something normal, not at all.

      But how do you explain the research done some time ago about PTSD being several times less prominent in less developed cultures than in modern society?

      On the other hand of course we can't just have someone explain on TV "hey dudes, it's the culture so rape is fine" as it'll result in a disaster.

      So pills it is... Nice to live in a modern society, isn't it.

    18. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      Old soldiers don't fight wars

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    19. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what you said the last time.

    20. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by orasio · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Of course, rape victims will be made victims twice because they will not be able to both use this pill to prevent the psychological damage and be considered a reliable witness. Defense Lawyers will say, just as you have assumed, that her memories were changed and there's no way she could identify her attacker reliably. And gullible people on the jury will go for it. "We can give you this pill that will help you be whole, but you'll have to give up on having a solid prosecution against your attacker." What a choice. Ironically, I would imagine that by reducing the tramatic effect of the attack, the victims memories might actually be more reliable.


      You make your assumptions about lawyers, and then you criticize those products of your imagination. Remember that you are the ne who made them up.

      The problem you are pointing out is real, and happens everytime.
      After something bad happens with you, you always have the choice to deal with it, or just try to forget it.
      This pill would be more on the second part. So a victim that doesn't want to deal with it shouldn't be in the trial about their rape.
      Of course defense lawyers could use any drug with psycological consequences against the witness, and they would be right. In thos disciplines, we don't really understand what happens in the mind. We have trouble understanding people who don't take drugs, it's much worse to make an assumption of reliability on someone that uses drugs to change memories.

    21. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by wirerat1 · · Score: 1

      What difference does it make? All a woman needs to do is accuse a man of rape and his name is ran through the mud and hers is protected by rape shield laws. The ability to not remember the event would play right into the whole inability of the defense to ask about the woman's sexual history too... Rape is bad, but women like to play the victim. As long as statistics show that a good portion of women lie about rape to get revenge on someone they have slept with, this pill fits right into the delusional fantasty land that our "modern society" has crafted...

    22. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I think what we really need is a memory pill that brings back real memories as opposed to made up ones. Too many cases where victims are 100% sure they are identifying their assaulter, and 15 years down the line DNA evidence proves the poor guy innocent.

    23. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by utexaspunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the reason rape is not considered a horrible awful thing in those other cultures is likely that the women are not treated with respect as intellectual equals in the first place, and thus their opinion with regard to whose penis gets to go inside them is not considered valuable. Naturally, if you have a woman who is raised to believe that her opinion is valuable and that she should be equal with men she will be scarred and indignant if another man forces his will upon her. It's as violent of an act as any. Would you be scarred and indignant if another man came and forced himself upon you?

      You can't have a culture that considers women equals with men where any man can do what he wants with a woman regardless of how she feels about it, because equality necessitates that it also be a culture where a man can do what he wants with a man regardless of how he feels about it, and you wouldn't want that.

    24. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I dont think that we actually store 'real memories', as everything is affected by our perception. Also you can affect people's memories of things by asking leading questions etc - people's heads in a way just falsify the details that they cant remember properly.

      I'd say memory works in the same way that a jpg or mp3 is made, chopping out the bits that arent deemed important, so that some information is lost irretrievably or subdued.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    25. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by jefu · · Score: 1
      "a victim that doesn't want to deal with it shouldn't be in the trial about their rape."

      I'm confused by this. Are you saying that if someone is raped and does not remember the rape that the rapist should not be prosecuted? Or just that the victim should not testify? Or what? What if the rapist administered the drug in question as part of the rape?

    26. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow do you sound like a troll.....But you have some decent points, should probably work on how you express them though.

      Now I seriously doubt that a "...good portion of women lie about rape..", but I'd be willing to bet my years salary that it is higher than 0%. It's a sad fact about our current news media and the structuring of laws. Yes victims need to feel secure in going to the police, hence the rape sheild laws. But it's depressing that the media cooralates being charged with a crime with being guilty of a crime in the suspects case. And yes once accused of rape someone is labelled a 'rapist' for the rest of their lives.

      I'm not sure what the solution is here, but I doubt that this new drug will effect the situation very much in either direction.

    27. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Ironically, I would imagine that by reducing the tramatic effect of the attack, the victims memories might actually be more reliable.
      I think you should wait for actual experiments to confirm or refute that hypothesis. Emotion has a huge impact on memory, that's the only reason we remember traumatic events as opposed to all the other 99% of boring life we forget. Deaden the emotion, and maybe you'll degrade the memories. I'm not claiming that, but I think it's just as likely as your guess, so wait for the facts before you slam the hypothetical juries of the future.
    28. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by orasio · · Score: 1

      "a victim that doesn't want to deal with it shouldn't be in the trial about their rape."

      I meant exactly that.
      If "not dealing with it" is the most important thing for the victim, the worst thing they could do is to go to a trial where they will be questioned, and the whole idea is to reconstruct the facts.
      Of course, if justice, or even revenge is what is most important for the victim, they are forced to "deal with it", because that's the only way they can make a case against the rapist.

      I didn't say that the first choice was sane (I don't think it is), but I think that it logically follows the premise of "not dealing with it".

    29. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      To maul an Oscar Wilde quote: you have to be somewhat comfortable before you can be really miserable.
      People who are right at the edge of survival have dulled responses: losing a limb, a child, is only a little worse than the day-to-day struggle to live. Nothing focusses a person's attention like starvation.

      I'm not saying rape, or any other crisis, is less horrible depending on the person's circumstances. I'm saying that *everything* is *more* horrible for many millions of people in the world, so something that people sitting in an office reading words on a computer screen consider incredibly scarring and awful, seems only a little worse than everything else to someone who has lost several children from malaria, typhus, and cholera and is going to have to beg or steal food from the neighbors tonight or not eat.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    30. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I used to be a serious bike racer, and had a lot of encounters with cars. One thing I learned was that when you get hit and you have any headache at all, call someone and tell them everything that happened and get them to write it down because the next day and particularly the day after, you might THINK you remember what happened but you don't really. All the details have changed and you're re-creating the accident based on what you know, a posteriori, happened. One time someone drove across the road and hit me head-on at about 45 mph (our speeds combined) and I went through her windshield. Three days later I was describing the incident to an insurance person, reading my notes, and realized that I incorrectly remembered the car's color, what time the accident had happened, and almost every identifying characteristic of the car's driver, but my notes had it all correct.

      The biggest crash I had, I was in a car and got rear-ended by a semi. I was stopped, the semi was doing about 85mph before he started braking. I don't remember that entire week, literally not a bit of it. But even so, I still don't ever drive in front of a semi truck anymore.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    31. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by chazwurth · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm misunderstanding Stan Vassilev's post, but I think his point was that maybe rape would be less traumatic if we didn't stigmatize it as much as we do. That is to say: maybe rape wouldn't be quite as horrible for the victim if our society didn't have the attitude (at least to some degree) that rape leaves you as 'damaged goods' or other similarly twisted anti-victim, anti-woman nonsense.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    32. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I used to do crisis counseling and quite a few calls would be rape victims who had decided to press charges and were in crisis the day before going in to court, or women who were trying to decide whether or not to come forward.

      Once making the decision to come forward themselves, usually they would be greatly encouraged by someone saying "you're doing something hard but thank you, you're making the world safer for all of us."

    33. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Old soldiers become leaders, vote and/or tell their children and grandchildren and whoever else will listen stories about what it really means to go to war.

    34. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      but I think his point was that maybe rape would be less traumatic if we didn't stigmatize it as much as we do.

      And after ol' Stan gets ass-raped by a half-dozen bikers looking for a little fun with a stupid suburbanite in the wrong part of town, he can get back to us on whether or not being a victim would be any less traumatic if ass-rape weren't such a big deal.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    35. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Forbman · · Score: 1

      The doctor said I subconsciously blanked everything else out. The same type of thing happens to people who've undergone serious trauma/abuse.

      Uh...this tends to happen only for very acute and rapid traumas, like being t-boned by a drunk driver. I would imagine that any cop who has shot and killed some kid, and found out that the kid was wielding just a BB gun, would give anything to just hit the DO OVER button on that one, wish he could blank it out, etc.

      There are also things like survivor guilt, etc. that are components of PTSD, as does knowing SOMETHING bad happened and not being able to remember it. What if in your car crash everyone else in your car or the other car had been killed?

      Yes, people can witness shit that traumatizes them so much their brain blocks it out. Unfortunately, it tends to lock up their brains on it, too.

    36. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      True, but it never seems to work out as they plan. "All Quiet on the Western Front" was one such story. "Saving Private Ryan" in the first 15 minutes showed the carnage and waste of life. Then it turned into a typical war flick. I bet people enlisted after seeing 'Ryan. The point is old vets complain bitterly about war, but young men still go off to fight them.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    37. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it works out. Some of us go to Remembrance Day ceremonies and think about what it means to go to war. Those vets (including the ones who don't come home) have families too... wives missing husbands, children missing fathers and grandfathers. Hollywood doesn't take it seriously, but they don't take anything seriously. People who take Hollywood seriously joining up in peacetime might be a good thing too -- a couple of years of service might convince at least a few of them that it really wouldn't be all that fun to go fight a war for real.

      How much less seriously would be take war if the old vets and the widows didn't have any emotion at all regarding war?

    38. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by jawskat · · Score: 1

      You said "You don't have to have the memories intact for an event to leave a lasting impression upon you". Sorry to disagree, I have found 30 years later I am now being subjected to violent memories as flashbacks, that I couln't remember before this current issue. ie: I was doing O.K. until a trigger brought back distant memories.

    39. Re:Do you want your memory altered? by chazwurth · · Score: 1

      So you don't think that victims have it harder when they have to deal with a blame-the-victim mentality, or when people around them think they're less valuable because they were victimized? What about countries in which women who are raped are sometimes killed because they've 'shamed their families'? Wouldn't those women have it easier if their families thought that rape wasn't 'such a big deal', at least in the sense that they wouldn't be dead?

      Stan sure was right when he said "I realize this will be taken wrong". The point isn't that rape isn't a big deal. The point is that even more damage can done to rape victims by the way their culture deals with rape. This isn't equivalent to saying that rape wouldn't be traumatic if the culture were different -- implying that is nothing but setting up a straw man.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
  7. yep. by User+956 · · Score: 1

    Canada's Globe & Mail is reporting that scientists are currently testing a 'trauma pill' that might help the victims of rape, the battlefield and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) forget or perhaps simply never store the memories of what happened to them the way they are stored normally immediately after the traumatic event, when the brain overloads itself with stress hormones.

    Does it work for roundhouse-kick related injuries?

    (That said, 4 out of 5 doctors fail to recommend Chuck Norris as a solution to most problems. Also, 80% of doctors die unexplained, needlessly brutal deaths.)

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:yep. by paiute · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris does not have to kick anyone anymore. He just shows his opponent a few of his acting chops and they fall down bleeding from the ears and eyes.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    2. Re:yep. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I heard that Justic Roberts voted against Oregon's Physician-assisted suicide law because he wanted them to use Chuck Norris.

      Chuck Norris: No Prescription Necessary

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  8. Scars of the mind by ChozCunningham · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "...Critics wonder what kind of an effect it would have on a victim not to work through the pain like people have traditionally done."

    Hmmm. It might leave them suitably un-traumatized, and ready to boldly march into positions of victimization as if they never had before. I wonder who that will benefit. Scar tissue sucks, specially acquiring it.; but doesn't it grow for a reason?

    1. Re:Scars of the mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree about scar tissue; everyone knows that chicks dig scars.

  9. First major use for them... by marcushnk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will be to put them into pez dispensers and give them out for free to IT support staff around the world.

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:First major use for them... by spacebird · · Score: 1

      My first thought exactly. Can I get one of these whenever I get transferred a call from the Philippines?

      --
      What, me? Never.
  10. Accept and move past... by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...contrary to the popular "deal with" or "confront" psychology of dealing with tragedy the most helpful mindset is actually to accept and move on. It is actually well documented that in dealing with disaster/death/tragedy it is best to acknowledge that it happened and the accept it and move on. This is well detailed in the book The Road To Malpsychia. Perhaps this pill will truly help. If you choose to take it you can save yourself years of trauma. While it sounds sinister, it may prove to be better than years of dysfuntions or worse suicidal depression etc. Who knows? I am willing to see how this pans out, although I am skeptical this will ever be handed out with rescue blankets by the government. Perhaps as an alternative perscription from a liscences psychiatrist, but not as a mass amnesiac.

  11. Wait... by axonal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what happens when the rapists and other evil-doers have this drug? Wouldn't it clear the victim of any knowledge of what happened occuring? Sort of brainwashing... Sounds like something that can easily be misused.

    1. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Wait... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Hmm, they could use the Date Rape drug, followed by the Trauma drug.

      Imagine if Karla Homolka had access to that combo, then she and her boy friend could still have been in business...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    3. Re:Wait... by hazem · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article says that it does not erase memories or prevent the memories. It simply helps keep the memory from becoming a PTSD type memory - where certain stimuli actually cause you to relive the event.

      The victim will still have her memory - and would probably be in a better place to accurately recall that memory.

      Besides, we already have drugs that will cause blackouts so that someone can rape someone else with them having little or no memory. Just look up "date rape drug".

    4. Re:Wait... by heatdeath · · Score: 1

      It bothers me when people don't actually read the article - they just post a comment on it based on the summary.

      No, this doesn't erase memories. It inhibits what your brain releases during trauma that makes the memories more vivid and terrifying years later. In fact, in the study, they had a hard time showing that there was a statistically significant difference in emotional response.

      Also, they already have drugs that make you forget what's happening while you're on it. That's what date-rape drugs do.

      --
      I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
    5. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Date rape drug? Largely a story made up by media looking for a new panic. In the vast majority of cases, the drug causing blackouts that rapists take advantage of is alcohol.

    6. Re:Wait... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      It bothers me when people don't actually read the article - they just post a comment on it based on the summary.

      New here, are you?

      The summary probably should have made it more clear that the pill really doesn't "erase memories"...it just prevents PTSD-like obsessing over them. However had they done that, they would have avoided the low drama that is manufactured controversy.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:Wait... by wirerat1 · · Score: 1

      I like how you automatically assume that a rape victim is a female with the use of "her"... So those recent cases in the news with female teachers raping their male students are irrelevant since it happened to a male. Ohhh, those poor females.. they must be protected at all costs. *sigh* When will they stop being put on a pedestal and be able to function as one of the unwashed masses of males who forged this society to where it is today... (oh, but that's right.. the patriarchy is keeping the women down and encouraging the objectification of women as sex objects leading to rape...) lol

    8. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm.. sorry. Have you never been a 15 year old boy?

      Baggin the hot teacher is the stuff of sweaty nights alone on a squeaky boxspring.

      They may have been APPREHENSIVE, but generally when you're unaccustomed to sexual contact you're apprehensive.

      I very seriously doubt that they, or any straight 15-year old boy, would be UNWILLING.

    9. Re:Wait... by camzmac · · Score: 0

      The article says that it does not erase memories or prevent the memories. It simply helps keep the memory from becoming a PTSD type memory - where certain stimuli actually cause you to relive the event.

      Perhaps having certain stimuli causing you to relive a memory is a mechanism to make sure you've learned from an experience (read: survival). If you saw your friend die from a powerful hand grenade, next time you hear a loud noise you'd most likely run for cover. And it doesn't matter what the cause of the loud noise was. Rather paranoid trait, but in some situations it may be the key to survival.

      So from what I understand is that the drug will supress this mechanism. But would that mean that you will lose certain habits that you have learned from past experiences? What if you were driving during icy conditions, and that habitual process of driving slower and increasing alertness that you learned from that car accident eight years ago during similar road conditions didn't kick in? Things like that might prevent this drug from gaining widespread use.

  12. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A pill to take away part of life and the human condition, some suffering.

    This can be mass-marketed and then we'll all sit around licking our PSPs, or something. If the average person thinks they need this, why not just wash down a bottle of Tylenol with some vodka and get it over with?

  13. Comfortably numb by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with apologies to Pink Floyd:
    "Just a little pin prick."
    " Aaaaaaaaaaaah!!!"

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Comfortably numb by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

      With NO apologies to James T. Kirk "I need my pain"

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
  14. Taken the drug already, have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems you've blotted out your entire educational history there, buddy.

    1. Re:Taken the drug already, have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he was pretty smart for a human bean.

  15. "And if anything should go wrong..." by plate+of+felt · · Score: 1

    i will happily claim my right to be unhappy, thank you very much.

  16. What I'm wondering... by cralewyth · · Score: 1

    Is what are the side-effects going to be like?

    I know that most anti-depressants and things like that often have side-effects that will affect 'patient'/'victim' for up to a year, sometimes more.

    --
    "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
  17. I've wondered about the ethics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... of a pill like this in certain situations.

    Suppose I commit a violent crime, then take a 'forgetfulness' pill. I don't remember committing the crime at that point. So can I argue my way out of punishment for the crime on that basis? What would be the point of punishing me for a crime I neither remember committing, nor remember being motivated to commit? Wouldn't that be morally equivalent to punishing an innocent person?

    Yeah, yeah, I know, put down the bong and go to bed. Still: where does guilt reside, if not in memory?

    1. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Silly rabbit. Prison isn't about rehabilitation or safety of the populace. It's about retribution. Ask any cop.

    2. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      where does guilt reside, if not in memory

      So it's about memory then, a crime? And not about victims? Or law? You don't have to remember having done a criminal act to be convicted. The moment you commit a crime, you have. It were your actions, you are accountable and responsable and not because of your memory thereof; this has nothing to do with memory. Being "guilty" isn't equal at "having the ability to feel guilty about the action" (and thus requiring the memory thereof).

      It doesn't mean you cannot remember something it hasn't occured or it "doesn't exist". I think dino's are awesome, but I don't have a memory of them. To your analogy, they never existed in the first place cause you don't have a memory of them walking around.

      Wouldn't that be morally equivalent to punishing an innocent person

      Lets try this out, I'll run you over and get you disabled for life. But I'll drink first, so I cannot have a recollection of the event, and forget why we're doing the experiment. You'll try to get a compensation for your grief (I'll drive over your cat too while I back up, just for added fun while we're at it) and drag me to court. I'll state I was drunk, cannot remember the event and thus cannot be guilty. On the notion drunk driving is illegal, I state I couldn't remember being motivated to drive while being drunk and being innocent because of that. That doesn't mean I didn't murder your cat, and attacked you.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    3. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by Mahou · · Score: 1

      Being "guilty" isn't equal at "having the ability to feel guilty about the action"

      yes, 'guilt' is equal to 'having the ability to feel guilty about an action performed' aka mens rea.

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    4. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Guilty
      1. Having incurred guilt; criminal; morally delinquent; chargeable with, or responsible for, something censurable; justly exposed to penalty; -- used with of, and usually followed by the crime, sometimes by the punishment. "They answered and said, He is guilty of death." Matt. xxvi. 66. "Nor he, nor you, were guilty of the strife." Dryden.
      2. Evincing or indicating guilt; involving guilt; as, a guilty look; a guilty act; a guilty feeling.
      3. Conscious; cognizant. [Obs.] B. Jonson.
      4. Condemned to payment. [Obs. & R.] Dryden.

        A psychopath may be unable to "feel guilth over his actions", that doesn't mean he isn't guilty (accountable) to his actions.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    5. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A psychopath may be unable to "feel guilth over his actions", that doesn't mean he isn't guilty (accountable) to his actions.

      But we (may) let him off the hook, on the grounds that he didn't know right from wrong when he committed the crime. So clearly, one's mental state is a big part of one's accountability to society.

      The DWI analogy fails because the nature of a post-hoc "amnesia pill" would effectively change the person. If my mind has no recollection of killing Joe Blow, how can I be treated as his murderer? You might as well convict an inanimate object. I'm not the same person as the guy that offed Joe... not anymore.

    6. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      I'm not the same person as the guy that offed Joe
      So, a person in an emotional state comitting a murder hasn't murdered?
      There are gradations, things like that are taken in account in court "first degree murder", "Voluntary Manslaughter" and "Involuntary Manslaughter", "impulsive", "planned", ... which are taken into account and are judge by people who are appointed to do so. (otherwise we'd have computers in courtrooms processing and constructing pure logical justice)

      not the same person as the guy that offed Joe... not anymore That would be a weird statement, you'll have to be able to prove that with psychology reports. But in reality you are *always* the same person. I'm the same wherever I take drugs, am drunk am clean, am Christian, get an amputated limb, ...
      If I get a tattoo I'm as well "not the same person", but my (official) identity is the same.

      My point is just that you cannot "erase" an act or event on the base of memory... Accountability is discussable, motive is as well, not the existence of the act that you have performed.

      Cause, if things are really like that where you are living, then I'm moving there and be free from any guilt, and evade the law accountability by changing a part of me occasionally so all my prior actions are voided. Like cutting my toenails, or a haircut, getting a tattoo, or even have my body generate new cells.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    7. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, if prison were only about retribution, it's more about money. Prison is more like big economic circle that "Big Brother" wants to get bigger. Lots of cheap labour! Don't you feel so much safer that more and more people get sent to jail for just getting high than ever before? My point is that we are taught that we are justified to segregate our society in such a way that we feel good about enslaving someone for their own personal choice. Why bother teaching our society how to use drugs responsibly when you can teach that it's OK to jail someone for being a "distructive" member of society. Have we really tried? My answer is no, not by a long shot. Besides, who do you think is a more compident worker, a rapist or an average drug user? My bet is on the drug user... Exclusive contracts for companys who provide service or goods. This is a no brainer. Anyone can see the benefit of having such a contract, certainly "Big Business" does. I certainly won't profit from a drug user as much as "Big Business". Now "Big Business" can profit off victims too! Now they can get a cut from both sides. Because we all know that rapists are so much safer than drug users, since most rapist repeat offenders serve far less time then first time offending drug users, we can get them back on the street faster than before and replace them with drug users!

      The wheels on the prison bus go round and round...

    8. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      A person with the condition probably knows the difference between right and wrong .. they just don't have any of the normal feeling associated with them.
      They most likely know it is wrong to steal someone's possessions , beat the crap out of them for no reason , or on a rare occasion kill them .. they just don't care.
      So they can easily be convicted of crimes as they are fully in control of their actions and normally would be fully aware of the consequences .
      You can only be found to have a diminished responsibility if it can be proven that you had no control over your actions, or a lessened control over them to a significant extent ..
      For example, if you had your drink spiked with some concoction of drugs then went on to kill someone by running them over accidentally .Only if it can be shown that you had absolutely no idea of your current mental state .
      I believe in California USA they did away with the defence ... so a person with the mental age of a 5 year old could be given the death penalty

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    9. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      I should note in the example above that the consumption of Alcohol or any drugs is not a defence normally accepted as diminished responsibility , if entered into willingly .
      Also , under Scottish Law , Psychopathic personality disorder /Antisocial personality Disorder can not be used as a defence of Diminished responsibility due to the perpetrator having full cognitive capacities as to their actions

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    10. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      A man was recently acquitted of murdering his father because he was sleepwalking when it occurred. Other people have similarly been acquitted because they believed that they were dreaming when they committed certain crimes. Explain how that fits into your logic.

    11. Re:I've wondered about the ethics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a goddamn fucking idiot. i don't know how you just got modded up for that dribble. the part you bolded means nothing. chargeable with, or responsible for? yeah in a court of law in order to be charged with something, in order to be considered guilty and held resposible for something, you need 2 things: actus reus and mens rea. fuck you must be like a sixth grader or something. n00b. a retard like you wouldn't be guilty for his actions because he can't understand doing something wrong.

  18. I know this is slashdot, but..... by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have any of your friends ever told you a horror story about waking up next to a m'fugly woman ???

    This kind of morning after pill might actually sell!

  19. Going Home Alone Tonight Pill by Mancat · · Score: 1

    Can it cheer me up when I get shot down repeatedly at the bar?

    --
    hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
  20. EMTs by ls+-la · · Score: 1

    I'm going through an EMT course, so I wonder if EMTs will eventually carry these pills.

    The question then would be whether they're for the EMT or the patient?

    1. Re:EMTs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? so you can be a newbie everytime there's a gruesome scene and someone's life is hanging in the balance in your hands? i thought experience was one of the most prized possessions in the medical field...

  21. What if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What if a rapist forcefully makes his victim consume this pill before raping her/him? Will they still have a full memory of what happened and be[somehow] without trauma? How the hell can rape just be a memory?

    1. Re:What if? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      She will remember it, just not give a shit...

      Which opens up other problems - if the victim doesn't care about what happens, is it legally rape? Especially as they're unlikely to ever report it.

  22. Oh, wow. This is bad. by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Step 1: Barney Fife and his partner beat a man to death for Driving While Brown in the First Degree
    Step 2: Hospital required to give memory-zapping pills to distraught family.
    Step 3: Profit (or at least no loss of profit from a lawsuit)
    "Ignorance is strength" indeed...

  23. Expect trouble, both from victims and the violent by 99luftballon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let us imagine this pill works and significantly reduces the trauma by helping the victim forget. It's not going to take the smartest defence lawyer to get the attacker off on the basis that the victim's testimony cannot be trusted, since they can't remember the attack. Such a pill would be unlikely to work if taken only after the trial because the synaptic pathways would have been established firmly by that time.

    The article also mentions military use; which is even more worrying. Suppose these had been around in Hitler's day - think how much more deadly the Holocaust would have been if SS guards could just take a pill and get on with the killing the next day. One of the reasons for the industrialisation of death in the gas chambers was that earlier methods of just shooting people caused very high levels of stress related breakdown among the executioners.

  24. Try Buddhism instead... by quokkapox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    i.e. This too shall pass, and all of that. A little suffering is inevitable; a lot of suffering is motivational.


    1. All worldly life is unsatisfactory, disjointed, containing suffering.
    2. There is a cause of suffering, which is attachment or desire, rooted in ignorance.
    3. There is an end of suffering, which is Nirvana.
    4. There is a path that leads out of suffering, known as the Noble Eightfold Path.

    The weird thing is, it actually works...

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by Profound · · Score: 0

      >> The weird thing is, it actually works...

      How do you tell? When you're not reincarnated next time?

    2. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by grolschie · · Score: 0, Troll

      What a load of crap. Ever met anyone who reached "nirvana"? I think not. Then how do you know it exists? None of your 4 so-called points bear any resemblance to fact.

      The whole karma / reincarnation concept is a total crock. Who setup and administers the reincarnation process? Buddhists don't believe in a personal god, but an inpersonal force. However, to orchestrate reincarnation, such a force requires by necessity intelligence and the ability to reason, remember and observe. Said force would need to be omni-present and have a personal interest in justice and human life. Basically what you need for this to actually be real is a personal, ever-present, all-powerful deity..... which buddhists don't believe in. Sheesh!!!

    3. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by spamdog · · Score: 2, Funny

      5. ???? 6. Profit!

    4. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by quokkapox · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What a load of crap. Ever met anyone who reached "nirvana"? I think not. Then how do you know it exists? None of your 4 so-called points bear any resemblance to fact. The whole karma / reincarnation concept is a total crock. Who setup and administers the reincarnation process? Buddhists don't believe in a personal god, but an inpersonal force. However, to orchestrate reincarnation, such a force requires by necessity intelligence and the ability to reason, remember and observe. Said force would need to be omni-present and have a personal interest in justice and human life. Basically what you need for this to actually be real is a personal, ever-present, all-powerful deity..... which buddhists don't believe in. Sheesh!!! </bigotry>

      Who said anything about reincarnation or karma? A load of crap indeed. Instead of deriving your worldview from television and popular culture, calm down and try reading a book or something. Or just sit there for 10 minutes and contemplate your existence. Or are you unable to do that?

      Fuckin' trolls...

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    5. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0. Suffering does not always mean suffering.

    6. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by Steeltoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      The point is to be happy now I believe, not waiting to not be reincarnated.

      Look at the Dalai Lama. He is the lead spiritual figure in Buddhism, and he still incarnates and looks pretty darn happy to me!

    7. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by Profound · · Score: 1

      >> The point is to be happy now

      This is completely wrong. The first noble truth of Buddhism:

        1. All worldly life is unsatisfactory, disjointed, containing suffering.

    8. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Dalai Lama is only a leading figure in a particular branch of Buddhism, the Tibetan part of the Vajrayana school. And, FWIW, he supposedly reincarnates because he's the current incarnation of the bodhisattva Avalokitesvara. Bodhisattvas forgo their own enlightenment so help others acheive their own.

    9. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by jefu · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not all Buddhists believe in the karma/reincarnation bit.

      You might want to check up on such things before you make yourself look quite so ignorant, and quite so, um, prejudiced.

    10. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by Asklepius+M.D. · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Buddhist, but I feel some of your logic may be flawed. First, the existence of an inpersonal force does not preclude the "ability to reason, remember, etc". The argument could be made that since I, incarnated, have these abilities, it is reasonable to extend these abilities into my percieved projection of myself after death. As far as omni-presence, interest in justice, and all that jazz goes: none of these things are "needed" for a "system" of reincarnation to exist. "Inpersonal" indicates that the driving force behind further learning comes from within. The system would function just as well with a self-assessment of one's life-abilities that is balanced by "insurmountable" challenges and difficulties faced if reincarnating as a "too advanced" being. Enlightenment doesn't get easier as one progresses; it gets harder. Buddhism is about seeking personal truth. I feel it is somewhat lacking in "pure altruism", and can be a little heavy on ceremony and symbolism, but that is an entirely different discussion. The point is, your arguement is flawed. First find the box, then try to look outside it.

      --
      He who would be a man, must be a nonconformist. -- Emerson
    11. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by grolschie · · Score: 2, Informative
      Who said anything about reincarnation or karma?
      uhh.... dude, what is Nirvana and how does one achieve it?

      "It is the ultimate goal of Buddhist practice and implies a release from the cycle of deaths and rebirths"
      ref: Parinirvana

      "When a person who has realized nirvana dies, his death is referred as his parinirvana, his fully passing away, as his life was his last link to the cycle of death and rebirth (samsara), and he will not be reborn again"
      ref: Nirvana

      "The aim of Buddhist practice is to end the cycle of rebirth called samsara (Pli, Sanskrit), by awakening the practitioner to the realization of true reality, the achievement of liberation (nirvana). To achieve this, one should purify and train the mind and act according to the laws of karma, of cause and effect: perform positive actions, and positive results will follow."
      ref: Buddhism.

      What part of "cycle of deaths and rebirths" and "laws of Karma" do you not understand? OP mentioned both Nirvana and Buddhism. In the Buddhist world-view, how does one reach Nirvana exactly?
    12. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by grolschie · · Score: 1
      Not all Buddhists believe in the karma/reincarnation bit.

      You might want to check up on such things before you make yourself look quite so ignorant, and quite so, um, prejudiced.
      The OP was proclaiming Nirvana. In Buddhism how exactly is Nirvana reached? Do enlighten me? What exactly is it a release from? Hmmm..... the cycle of death and rebirth perhaps? The scope of my comment wasn't all encompassing, but in reference to the concepts preached by the OP.

      BTW, how in this situation is Nirvana going to help a rape victim? This life is screwed, what until the next one?

      The OP was making assertions, is it prejudiced to even question these simply because they are a religious world-view? Good grief! I am not convinced about Nirvana and the Buddhist world-view. Lets see some evidences. Show us someone who has reached "Nirvana" and lets interview him/her. Does it even exist? How do you know?
    13. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5. There is an end to Nirvana, and that is a shotgun blast to the face.

    14. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by blippy · · Score: 1
      The whole karma / reincarnation concept is a total crock.

      Karma means action. Vipaka means result. So the "karma concept" means that causes have results. Karma is the seed for vipaka. So karma isn't a weird concept, it's a verifiable fact. Good karma creates potential for good results, bad karma creates potential for bad results. Commit a crime, and you could end up in jail.

      Now, you may be thinking that this is obvious - and you'd be right. Much trouble exists in this world because we either don't understand the principles of karma, or don't act in accordance with it.

      All know the way; few actually walk it. -- Bodhidharma

      Who setup and administers the reincarnation process?

      Who sets up and administers gravity?

    15. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by grolschie · · Score: 1
      Who sets up and administers gravity?
      The rotation of the earth perhaps could be the force behind gravity?

      BTW, unlike reincarnation, gravity is observable and testable. The concept of karma where people reap what they sow in their next life is not. Reaping what you sow in this life might be realized i.e. smoking all your life might cause cancer. However the idea that you reap from unrelated events via karma is not observable.
    16. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by blippy · · Score: 1
      Who sets up and administers gravity?

      The rotation of the earth perhaps could be the force behind gravity?

      Sigh. It was a rhetorical question. The point was that noone sets up and administers gravity, it does it by itself. Likewise for karma. *that* was the point I was making.

      The concept of karma where people reap what they sow in their next life is not. Reaping what you sow in this life might be realized i.e. smoking all your life might cause cancer.

      The concept of karma does not state that what you sow in this life you will reap in the next. Karma is more down-to-earth than that. As your example stated, it's perfectly possible for bad karma to ripen in this life.

      However the idea that you reap from unrelated events via karma is not observable.

      Your comment does not contradict the principle of karma. Karma is about causes and effects. If an event has a result, then ipso facto it is related.

      As an examaple, I went into a bookshop once, and picked up a book on buddhism. The book stated that the mere fact that I picked up the book was no accident, but essentially "had" to be. When you think about it, the author was speaking the truth. I was interested in buddhism, I decided to enter the bookshop, I went to the section on religion, etc.. Me picking up the book was the "fruition" of a whole string of previous karmas. All the events were related interdependently - there were no "unrelated" ones.

    17. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by quokkapox · · Score: 1
      What part of "cycle of deaths and rebirths" and "laws of Karma" do you not understand?

      What part of "metaphor" do you not understand?

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    18. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Care to explain this "metaphor" for the less "enlightened"?

    19. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by grolschie · · Score: 1
      Your comment does not contradict the principle of karma. Karma is about causes and effects. If an event has a result, then ipso facto it is related.
      " In religions that incorporate reincarnation, karma extends through one's present life and all past and future lives as well. " ref: karma A little more than simply "cause and effect". How can you cause something to happen in a next life? Can you prove that there is a next life? Nope.
    20. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by blippy · · Score: 1
      Can you prove that there is a next life? Nope.

      And in that, I concede defeat. According to Buddhism, there is no soul, no permanent self. So the age-old question is "if there is no soul, then what gets reincarnated". No clearcut answers are usuallly forthcoming from monks, though.

      Apparently there do exist, or did exist, people who could determine the fate of people after they died. Alas, there does not appear a way to determine the veracity of their claims.

      Still, that's no reason why any of this should prevent one seeking Nirvana in this life. And since vipaka operates in this life, it is definitely worthwhile developing good karma. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

    21. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by grolschie · · Score: 1
      Can you prove that there is a next life? Nope.
      And in that, I concede defeat. According to Buddhism, there is no soul, no permanent self. So the age-old question is "if there is no soul, then what gets reincarnated". No clearcut answers are usuallly forthcoming from monks, though.

      Apparently there do exist, or did exist, people who could determine the fate of people after they died. Alas, there does not appear a way to determine the veracity of their claims.

      Still, that's no reason why any of this should prevent one seeking Nirvana in this life. And since vipaka operates in this life, it is definitely worthwhile developing good karma. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
      That concept actually pre-dates Buddha. I guess that Buddha added the reincarnation to the concept. Although it seems you don't believe in Buddhism in it's purest sense.

      I still don't see how quokkapox's reference to karma and buddhism helps a trauma or rape victim in the now. His comment would be very inflamatory and insensitive to such readers. No hope whatsoever in that message.
    22. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by blippy · · Score: 1
      That concept actually pre-dates (ref to Galatians 6:7 ) Buddha.

      There is much wisdom in the bible. When the bible talks of "ashes to ashes, dust to dust", Buddhists will recognise that as a teaching on impermanence and the unsatisfactory nature of existence.

      Don't flame me if I have my facts wrong here, but I heard somewhere that early Christianity did believe in reincarnation, but that it got suppressed after awhile. And it's the The Church Of The Latterday Saints, or something (again, don't flame me for factual inaccuracy), that believe that Jesus was reborn in North America. Not that I'm trying claim that this "proves" reincarnation, you understand.

      Although it seems you don't believe in Buddhism in it's purest sense.

      The Buddha said that even his words needed to be examined. From the reincarnation angle, it's impossible to verify scientifically, and it's probably safe to say that many Buddhists have great doubts about the whole reincarnation thing. Still, I think it's possible to leave the issue of reincarnation aside, and ask to what extent the religion can still serve a purpose. And I find that Buddhism offers a great deal of insight into the nature of the world, and our purpose in life.

      I still don't see how quokkapox's reference to karma and buddhism helps a trauma or rape victim in the now. His comment would be very inflamatory and insensitive to such readers. No hope whatsoever in that message.

      Buddhism is no quick fix. Rape victims will most likely suffer. The Buddha pointed out that the world does indeed suck. The Buddha looked for a way out of suffering, and claimed to have found it. He did not say that it would be easy, only that it is possible. The rape victim suffers because of a sense of self. When the sense of self diminishes, and the anger is let go if, then the mental anguish will decline.

      Once, a woman went to a monk with a very sick child, and asked what the child did to deserve such a punishment. The monk explained that although one could speculate about whether he liked to choke kittens and puppies in a previous life, the reason he has to suffer is because he was born.

    23. Re:Try Buddhism instead... by grolschie · · Score: 1
      Don't flame me if I have my facts wrong here, but I heard somewhere that early Christianity did believe in reincarnation, but that it got suppressed after awhile. And it's the The Church Of The Latterday Saints, or something (again, don't flame me for factual inaccuracy), that believe that Jesus was reborn in North America. Not that I'm trying claim that this "proves" reincarnation, you understand.
      Don't worry, you are not flaming. Many people of old had various beliefs differing from christianity. The problem with these pseudo-christian religions is that they overlook historical facts. For example it is historically documented that the risen Christ appeared in the flesh to multitudes over a period of about 40 days after his crucifixion. There were 500 eye-witnesses at one time. He ascended in front of witnesses in bodily form into the sky. He did not die a second time, so logically cannot reincarnate. Jesus Himself also claimed that He would return in the exact same bodily form, another fact the refutes the reincarnated Christ idea.

      When you weigh the historical facts between christian religion and pseudo-christian, the evidence is overwhelmingly in support of the biblical view. Here is a good reference if you are interested in the evidence.

      The groups that teach a reincarnated christ deviate from true christianity and are based heavily on occult. Regarding Joseph Smith of the Mormons, many of the claims he made about his religion are easily refused by historic evidence and logic. Many were fraud.

      Even before Christ, some jews strayed from Judaism into the occult (e.g. the kabbalah). The Christian bible is a collection of Jewish and Christian writings. Of course other opposing religions would not be incorporated into the mainstream. Reincarnation was never mainstream in Judaism or Christianity, therefore it would have been outright rejected as opposed to suppressed like a dirty secret. :-)

      Peace, grol
  25. I NEED my pain! It makes me who I am! by permaculture · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I don't want my pain taken away! I NEED my pain!" -- Kirk, TFF

    --
    Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    1. Re:I NEED my pain! It makes me who I am! by spectrumCoder · · Score: 1

      It can be handy. How can you learn from your mistakes if you don't have the painful memory of the consequences?

      This all reminds me of that drug they give people who undergo surgery while conscious. They feel the pain, but they form no memory of it. That way they don't get Post Trauma Stress because they can't remember undergoing anything stressful.

      Personally, it scares the hell out of me. If I can't remember it, then how can I know what I've really experienced and what I haven't?

    2. Re:I NEED my pain! It makes me who I am! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no memory of physical pain. You remember it being bad but the actual amount of pain is not stored in memory. This is a good thing!! The human race would quickly die out if women remember the actual pain of giving birth.

    3. Re:I NEED my pain! It makes me who I am! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That movie never happened! There was no Star Trek V, and Spock does not have a half-brother named Skippy.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  26. Katrina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure GW Bush wish he had this pill during Katrina.

    "George bush likes black people"

  27. It's called the 60 and 70's. by Vskye · · Score: 1

    forget or perhaps simply never store the memories of what happened to them the way they are stored normally immediately after the traumatic event

    Drop a tab of 4-way windowpain, some mushrooms.. ?
      WTF? Since when is introducing a drug actually a good thing for treatment to stress disorder / whatever.

    --
    Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
  28. We must consider the consequences of these drugs by Debian+Troll's+Best · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The study of how memories are actually formed in the human brain, and neurobiology/neurochemistry in general have undergone massive leaps forward in the past 10 - 20 years. Articles like this one not only highlight to the general public how far neuroscience has come recently, but also that it may be creating more questions than it provides answers. Apart from the intriguing neurochemical consequences of using beta-blockers to modulate memory formation, there are no doubt significant ethical and legal issues which arise. Indeed, it is not difficult to imagine some of the complications associated with interfering with a process such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which is not yet fully characterized at a psychological or neurochemical level.

    A recent experience at my workplace accentuated how much more we have to learn about PTSD and what the ramifications of biochemically tampering with it might be. Late one night, a few months back, I got a panicked call on my cell phone from one of the junior system administration staff. He informed me that an electrical fire had broken out in the server room, that the halon fire system wasn't responding, and that the whole server room was on the verge of going up in flames. I tried to calm him (we had a good set up backups offsite), asked him to grab my treasured coffee mug with the vi command set printed on it, and to exit the building in a orderly fashion. As soon as he'd done that, I called the fire department, jumped in my car and drove to the office.

    By the time I had arrived the firemen had the situation under control (the halon system had eventually kicked in), but my junior was sitting out in the carpark staring straight ahead, not really responding to any stimulus or being terribly coherent. I asked one of the firemen to fill my vi mug with some hot coffee they'd brought with them, got my junior sipping from the mug, and started to get some sense from him. After speaking with him for a while, I determined that the best way for him to deal with the trauma of almost being burned alive (and losing his bosses ' vi mug) was to get him back to work as quickly as possible.

    I took him through to another part of the building unaffected by the fire where we kept some backup server systems. I asked him to rebuild and reconfigure our main file server as quickly as possible. Unfortunately it was quite out of date, so he needed to upgrade several of the packages before it was production ready. I left him to it, and went back outside to discuss the events of the evening with the fire department (and to refill my vi mug).

    Around 20 minutes later, I went to check on my junior. Incredibly, he'd already completed the server upgrade and had the system online. I asked him how he had managed the feat so quickly. After all, there would be many dependencies to manage, and several packages would need to be manually configured and cross-checked from a variety of download sites. All he could say was 'apt-get...apt-get took care of it' as he rocked back and forth. It seemed that an entire portion of his memory from the previous 20 minutes had been erased, or more likely, never 'recorded' in his brain. He simply had no memory of having to manage complex dependencies! There was no mental archive of scouring download sites for appropriate libraries! It was like it had all just happened...automatically.

    Needless to say, the incident scared me a little, and was a graphic illustration of not only the awesome power of apt-get, but also how little we understand of post traumatic stress disorder. Are we really in a position to start tampering with brain chemistry as such a fundamental level? Will valuable subconscious information be lost by using these drugs? Is it possible to remember all of the apt-get command switches accurately while under the influence of PTSD suppressing beta blockers? I certainly look forward to the community's response on this one!

  29. has to be administered on the spot by puzzled · · Score: 1


        I can see blocking formation of memories for rape victims and the like, but giving it to veterans? After they get home? That makes no sense - the memories would be imprinted. Giving it when the trauma occurs in battle might or might not work - you wouldn't want to give it after combat missions - you'd have perpetually green troops rather than seasoned veterans and a higher casualty rate to go with it.

        There are already techniques to desensitize those with troublesome memories - try a Google for 'NLP' and 'reframing'. I had this done for some PTSD stuff I had about ten years ago and it worked amazingly well - three treatments over six weeks and a large portion of my symptoms had evaporated by the end of that time. I've had a handful of the falling/chasing type dreams since then, I see what is after me, and I see myself escaping. I still have the memories of the stuff behind the PTSD in case I run into a similar situation but they just don't have any power left in them.

        This story is much more interesting from the perspective of our increased knowledge of brain function than from any immediate therapy value.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:has to be administered on the spot by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Not to make fun of your story, but when I was younger, I used to have those falling-falling-falling dreams.

      I'd usually wake up on the floor, but every now and then, I'd wake up in mid-fall and get a hand out in time to stop my plunge.

      I still have those being-chased dreams though. They suck majorly.

      And since we're on /. here's the obligatory wikipedia link
      NLP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-linguistic_prog ramming

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:has to be administered on the spot by puzzled · · Score: 1


        There are many, many, many flakes who are all into NLP. The foundations are found in things like transformational grammar, which is non-flaky and within easy intellectual reach of your average software engineer. The perceptual stuff is also easily understood and applied to daily life - no voodoo too it, just subtlety and observation skills.

          I used the Curing Phobias stuff to put an end to the dreams and other stuff and it worked double quick ...

      --
      I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
  30. Too little, too late by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "forget or perhaps simply never store the memories of what happened to them"

    Where was this back when I was in high school? Seriously, they should put this into the cafeterian food...

    1. Re:Too little, too late by Ars+Dilbert · · Score: 1

      I came here to post "too little too late". But high school? Huh? You must be in your early 20s. High school is/was the best time of my life.

      I wish this pill was available back in early 90s. I would not have had to live with PTSD for 15 years (war veteran).

  31. MDMA (Ecstasy) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, they don't need to make one. MDMA (Ecstasy) already exists.

    But hey, if everyone is stuck in this mentallity that all drugs, and every drug is bad, people who need it wont be getting it soon enough.

  32. Paging Dr. Pangloss by NSash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Critics wonder what kind of an effect it would have on a victim not to work through the pain like people have traditionally done."

    People said the same thing when anaesthesia was invented. There were those who worried that people would suffer from missing out on the "transformative experience of pain." Guess what? It turns out that biting a stick while a surgeon sawed off your leg wasn't that crucial to enriching the human experience after all.

    These criticisms don't have any rational basis. People who have suffered post-traumatic stress disorder aren't better adjusted than other humans -- quite the opposite. Irrational fear of change runs deep, it seems.

    1. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but when you use anasthesia to deal with the pain of having your leg removed, you'll wake up (painlessly) and have the missing leg to remind you than using a rotary saw while drunk is an experience you would care not to repeat.

      If a young woman goes to bars alone and gets plastered and amorous on a regular basis, (let's not touch the blame arguement with a seven-foot-pol) and sometimes date-raped from these encounters, the magic pills will prevent her from learning why this behavior is not too wise.

    2. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      PTSD and people with extreme anxiety/phobias tend to respond very well to Virtual Reality therapies.

      It's a relatively new field, but they basically introduce the person to whatever is causing their problems, while keeping them in a controlled environment.

      The key is that the doctors can control the amount of sensory stimulation. If big fat hairy spiders sends the patient into the red, they can display a circle with 8 legs and then work up from there. The doctors also use 'crude' physical props to aid in the experience.

      I remember reading an article about them doing this with war vets (the type who hit the floor when they hear a loud bang) and it was very effective in showing them that nobody was shooting at them and that there was nothing to fear. After a bunch of sessions, they went home changed men.

      Wish I could find a link for you.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1
      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    4. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      PTSD and people with extreme anxiety/phobias tend to respond very well to Virtual Reality therapies.

      It's a relatively new field, but..


      If it's a relatively new field, then it's too new to know whether people with extreme anxiety and phobias really respond well to it yet.

      As the parent poster mentions, it may be that extreme psychological disorders brought on my suffering are not actually all that instructional and if you can avoid years spend in therapy (/ however long spent in some prepared VR environment) to simply overcome the problem and get back where you started, why not? Especially with something like rape - it's not like a phobia of spiders that you can overcome and then say, "Great, now I can finally clean out the shed" - outside of the penal system, being better psychologically prepared for the next rape isn't really useful or desirable.
    5. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by eth1 · · Score: 1

      "People said the same thing when anaesthesia was invented. There were those who worried that people would suffer from missing out on the "transformative experience of pain." Guess what? It turns out that biting a stick while a surgeon sawed off your leg wasn't that crucial to enriching the human experience after all."

      The difference is that, in general, anaesthesia is preventing the experience altogether, whereas this pill is trying to make you forget it after the fact. In most cases, if I've already gone through the trouble of having a bad experience, I might as well remember it so I can learn from it. It's not useless, though... rape and severe cases of child abuse come to mind as instances where it could help.

    6. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between erasing the pain and erasing the memory. I can easily imagine this being used for ill. In fact I can't imagine that it would NOT be used for ill. Any number of atrocities can be carried out if you can conveniently make people "forget" it happened. Gestapo killed your uncle? Forget that. Mr. Dictator annihilates your village with nerve gas? Erase those nagging memories of sallow dead corpses! Did you secretly perform ethnic cleansing or hide illegal weapons? Stay care free with no memory! And finally, were you covertly tortured? Quell that anxiety with a pill!

      When you do bad shit or bad shit is done to you, your conscience records it. If we remove conscience we can develop legions of guiltfree zombies or unwitting victims whose clear conscience is just a pill away.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    7. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by mblase · · Score: 1

      The key is that the doctors can control the amount of sensory stimulation. If big fat hairy spiders sends the patient into the red, they can display a circle with 8 legs and then work up from there. The doctors also use 'crude' physical props to aid in the experience.

      Serious question: how would this therapy apply for those who have been suffering post-traumatic stress disorder due to rape?

    8. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      It really depends on you personality. I havent had a chance to try no anaesthesia with a general surgery. But for dental work including tooth pulling I always request no anaesthesia. It hurts like hell, but I believe it helps me reflect on my experience.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    9. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Basically, they can recreate the situation/environment and walk the person through their experiences.

      It works, because they can stop the simulation at any point and talk the person through what they're feeling and why. They use it to calm (rational-to-the-victim) fears of people/places/whatever.

      Google for "exposure therapy" virtual reality and rape.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    10. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by bohemian72 · · Score: 1

      If a circle with eight legs ran across my floor, I'd still be freaked out.

      --
      The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
    11. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The author of the article itself says that we desperately need this pill for all the returning war vets. War is nasty. It's GOOD to be traumatized by it because then you take it seriously when next you're considering whether to go to war or not.

    12. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by toddestan · · Score: 1

      If a circle with eight legs ran across my floor, I'd still be freaked out.

      Okay, for you we'll start with a square with 4 legs and work up from there.

    13. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Except that those pushing the war tend to as a whole to have avoided as much as they could any involvement with being in the military, with a couple of notable exceptions (that prove the stereotype). As it has almost always been. So unless the legislatures and bureaucrats pushing for military actions have anything personally invested (i.e., kids currently in the military or past experiences of their own to temper their actions now), then military action is an easy thing, because someone else is doing the dirty work for you, and you get to take in the relative glory of it all.

      But it's been like that for a long time.

      Yes, we really could use this pill for returning war vets. People who have switched their normal civilized behaviors to the exact opposite, which are required to survive in a combat situation. Traffic stopped for an accident? The rest of us slow down and gawk at it. For many truck drivers returning from Iraq, it has been well-reported that the usual way to deal with a traffic stoppage in Iraq is to hammer the gas and blow through it as quick as possible, for it could be a setup for an ambush, and those who linger in ambush zones die. If The Pill could help turn that off, that would be a good thing.

      President Bush never consulted the VA, DAV, et al before initiating hostilities in Iraq & Afghanistan. But neither did President Roosevelt, President Wilson, President Eisenhower/Kennedy/Johnson/Nixon, etc. either.

    14. Re:Paging Dr. Pangloss by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      True. Which is very unfortunate. I see male royals in England still do their military service -- a long standing a well advised tradition.

      However, supposedly in a democracy the people ultimately get to make the decisions. Yes, the leader can probably ram through a war, depending on the system (I believe in Canada you need Parliament's approval first) but that doesn't mean he can maintain that war.

      We seem to be awfully casual with the word war these days... war on drugs, war on terror... try pitching the war on drugs to an audience that still had fresh memories of WWII. Or any other war for that matter. Remember what the public outcry was like during the Vietnam "police action?" The protests during the Iraq war were pitiful in comparison, and it was a war of aggression as opposed to a mostly defensive war.

      I agree it would be great to have a cure for PTSD. I don't know if it's such a good idea to give all soldiers this you'll-remember-but-it-won't-bother-you pill because a few of you might develop severe PTSD. I suppose you could give it to the wives (husbands) and children too. Or anybody who gets too upset about war, ultimately.

  33. Learning by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    The existence of such a pill would contradict everything we know about our brains.

    Try integrating what you need to learn with your existing knowledge. It might help to have an emotional reason to remember whatever it is you're trying to remember. Rote memorizing of facts is stupid, because you'll forget them sooner or later.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Learning by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Rote memorizing of facts is stupid, because you'll forget them sooner or later.

      Rote memorization of facts can be incredibly useful, if all you want to do is get through an examination or something.

      There's a lot of "education" which doesn't require learning at all, just memorizing stuff. It's obnoxious, and arguably a waste of your time as a student, but it exists. Sometimes if you want to get ahead in the world you have to play that game, and realize people are going to judge you by how well you can play it.

      A pill that gave you near photographic recall for even a few hours, even if it didn't integrate that information with your existing knowledge, and even if it resulted in you forgetting all of it in a few hours or days, could still be extremely useful.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Learning by afabbro · · Score: 1
      Rote memorizing of facts is stupid, because you'll forget them sooner or later.

      For the last 30 years, I've remembered how to spell Mississippi. I have no real reason to remember that, except once I had to learn it. I also know the product of 4x8, pi to five digits, a few hundred words of German, and various factoids about Roman archaeology. Little emotional connection to any of it.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    3. Re:Learning by sjames · · Score: 1

      A pill that gave you near photographic recall for even a few hours, even if it didn't integrate that information with your existing knowledge, and even if it resulted in you forgetting all of it in a few hours or days, could still be extremely useful.

      I would say it would be a lot safer if all the useless trash you packed in DID evaporate in a few days.

      Otherwise, there's a fair chance of cluttering up your memory with so many uselessly associated 'facts' that you don't even understand that you'll have significant problems later. Imagine becoming Rainman without the ability to do quick computations.

      Essentially, that pill would make you an instant expert at the least effective mode of thinking and learning known.

      In other words, it's the thought involved in learning where you associate the new ideas and facts with what you already know that forms useful knowledge.

      The one back handed benefit is that if enough people used it in college (such that the whole 4 years effectively evaporates before your first interview), even HR departments might decide that a degree is a useless metric for suitability.

    4. Re:Learning by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No, if everyone used it eventually everyone would get 100% on bad tests and lazy instructors would have to get less lazy and design real assignments and tests. Then the degree would actually mean something more than "I stuck with it for four years."

  34. they sell it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as a POST trauma drug, but in military useage it will be used more often as a PRE trauma drug. Get rid of those pesky inhibitions of genocide, torture, "free fire zones" "destroy the village to save the village" whatever and etc. Or say send your boys out on a "questionably legal" mission, say something to do with domestic work and civvies, whistleblowers, whatever. A nasty job but it needs to be done, there are careers and billions at stake! Single dose for the team going out,a double dose back on return. Problem solved, no memories from your boys, no leaks!

    Oh no, this won't be used and abused....

  35. Use for slashdotters by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Make a clumsy nerd pass at some hot woman
    2. Receive painful, ego-shattering rejection.
    3. Take pill.
    4. Suddenly 2. doesn't seem so bad...
    5. ???
    6. Profit

    (7. Repeat)

    1. Re:Use for slashdotters by Tethys_was_taken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, the horror! The horror!!

      You had to bring it up didn't you... Just when I was forgetting the whole event, you had to dredge it up again... Bastard. :-)

    2. Re:Use for slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too far from what I had tought...

      I'm so getting a jar of these, and I'll pop one every time my ex calls! *shudder* That's one thing I truly wanna forget.

    3. Re:Use for slashdotters by jspoon · · Score: 1

      1. Make a clumsy nerd pass at some hot woman
      2. Receive painful, ego-shattering rejection.
      3. Take pill.
      4. Suddenly 2. doesn't seem so bad...
      5. ???
      6. Profit
      (7. Repeat)

      Actually, this business plan is not iterative, it's recursive. See, the pill makes you forget so your unknown step 5 is actually step 1 which leads to step 2 and so forth. This leads us to two conclusions-your step 7 is redundant and you never reach step 6. I guess it's back to business school for you.

  36. New Scientist had good coverage of this last year by The+Rev · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This might be a "re-press". I've not read TFA but this was covered in depth in New Scientist on Decemeber 3rd 2005.

    The NS article had some very interesting moral and ethical questions too.

    You want to pass a polygraph after comitting a murder. Could taking these pills before committing the crime help that? If this were the case, could the presence of metabolites of the drug in your system be used to incriminate you?

    Do we really want to raise an army where the soldiers experience no guilt whatsoever no matter who and how many they kill? Soldiers are members of society too. Do we really want that kind of future society?

    The philosophical argument is interesting too. Memories are a fundamentally defining attribute of the human experience. What happens to us as human beings when we choose to modify that?

    There's no doubt that trauma patients in A&E benefitted from receiving these kinds of drugs. Their experiences and states of mind after the fact were demonstrably better than those who didn't get the drug.

    I can totally see scenarios where this could have great value.

    I'm just saying that it could be a very sharp double-edged sword.

    Thoughts?

  37. So did Jim Carry by SlashDread · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The eternal sunshine of a spotless mind" seems very truthfull all of a sudden. Good film too.

    1. Re:So did Jim Carry by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Another Jim Carry reason for the pill ... Is not being traumatised after I had ever seen Bruce Almighty

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:So did Jim Carry by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      How happy is the blameless Vestal's lot!
      The world forgetting, by the world forgot
      Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!
      Each pray'r accepted, and each wish resign'd.

  38. Uses ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's theorized that the pills could eventually be handed out to victims of Katrina-like disasters as well as returning war veterans.

    I bet it works wonders on torture victims, too.

  39. Trauma by Edman · · Score: 1

    I had a very hard trauma to solve; caused a car accident in which my mother died. It was very hard to get through, but I grew mentally and psychologically stronger. It's these phsychic impacts, which make us more and more able to live through a world full of hard tasks - if we don't learn to stand up again after a hard blow, we will break down after a light one!!!

    1. Re:Trauma by conureman · · Score: 1

      I am not a doctor, but I always thought PTSD was related to the special kind of stress caused by the inability to fight/flee the fear/panic inducing stimulis. As like caught in an artillery barrage or such.(I am also am not a veteran, but I once had a dream of being in a minefield that is traumatic to remember after many years!) I don't mean to belittle the many traumas which may have occurred in the course of your mother's passing, but it seems to me that there is a difference here of sorts. It seems like some sorts of stresses don't actually lead to life-affirmment or moral strengthening as well as others. Of course some are probably *cowards and weaklings* too. Chin up!

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  40. Re:New Scientist had good coverage of this last ye by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    A skilled psychiatrists/hypnotist can pretty much implant memories if they get you to lower your guard far enough.

    My guess is that an evil shrink could induce anxiety disorder/phobias in otherwise normal people, just through the power of suggestion.

    Anyways, my point is that memories aren't the real problem, but the emotions we associate with the memory.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  41. Need the pain!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What doesnt kill me.. makes me stronger!!!

  42. There's Evidence That Suggests Forgetting is Good by putko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the sort of thing that suggetss forgetting is good:

    http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsweek/Reliving_tr auma_Pluses_and_minuses.htm

    Traditional psychiatry, with its emphasis on remembering every humiliating or traumatizing moment of your life could easily make you miserable.

    If you look at treatments for PTSD, you'll see that psychotherapy hasn't been proven to be helpful.

    Look at the standard human reaction after a war: don't talk about it. Pretend it didn't happen. Try to get on with life. Otherwise you'll just be a mess, and not get anything done.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  43. Hey! Can I have one? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Hey! Can I have one?

    I'm trying to forget my last Windows crash................

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  44. Finally by JumperCable · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally there is a solution for dups on slashdot!

    1. Re:Finally by edgr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Surely the dupes on slashdot are evidence that the editors have been given early samples.

    2. Re:Finally by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Not only that but there is finally a solution for the dupes on Slashdot!

    3. Re:Finally by Nimloth · · Score: 1

      You're right, but the plan isn't to prevent dupes in the first place. The way it works, when you subscribe to Slashdot you'll be sent a lifetime supply of these. When a dupe is posted, 2-4 caplets until you think it's normal that it keeps happening.

  45. preventive medication, the war against trauma by happyrabit · · Score: 1

    Maybe, authorities should administrate medication BEFORE any potential traumatic experience, as Katrina, at least there will be less complains afterwards, everybody would be sooo much happier, after all, isn't that what we all are looking for?

    Better prevent than cure, ...a preventive approach of trauma? I know some leaders that would love the idea, ;)

    Anyway, I'd love to have a pill before next status meeting,

    --
    I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.
    1. Re:preventive medication, the war against trauma by PrayingWolf · · Score: 1
      Or maybe we should all be placed in nice warm containers and have our brains plugged into a perfect, blissfull world without accidents or trauma.
      Instead of working IRL, our bodies would produce heat and miniscule amounts of electricity to run our robotic overlords... hey, I think I saw this happen somewhere... but can't remember where. Maybe someone's been giving me pills already(?)

      Sig? I only have a hazy recollection of those things.

    2. Re:preventive medication, the war against trauma by jibjibjib · · Score: 0

      I read a star trek book once called "The Joy Machine" It was about a society in which they had a machine to make people happy, and it totally screwed up their society.

  46. Sybok? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else getting Star Trek 5 flashbacks here?

    I've been looking for a text of Kirk's speech on the issue of "forgetting" your pain. Perhaps a lone Slashdotter can recite it from memory. If it was good enough for Bones, then it's good enough for me.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Sybok? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I forgot that movie, you insensitive clod!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  47. Beeeep by Dasch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HAL: "Look Dave, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill and think things over."

  48. Brave New World by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    A gramme is better than a damn.

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  49. Not necessarily by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    This is just capitalism at its worst.
    Their personal spiritual outlet, diet, exercise, and positive social contact are what people require.
    Given the lack of deep understanding of how the brain works, I'm perfectly content to watch other people spend a lot of money experimenting with their body chemistry.
    Not that these daredevils are operating in isolation. The insurance companies, alas, spread the costs around the economy to a painful extent.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  50. Use in conjuction with "Date rape pill" by Argentice · · Score: 1

    For a guilt free night out.

  51. New pill, huh? by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

    "It's a pretty harmless drug," he said. "If you could give them one or two pills that could prevent PTSD, that would be a pretty good thing."

    Now, what are the effects when these pills are taken in larger doses - say 6-10? Hallucinations, hunger - accompanied by greater appreciation for taste and aroma, dry throat, open-eyed visuals?

  52. Medical opinion by Nurseferatu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Already use this a lot for heart patients, not a dramatic new drug, haven't seen many psychological effects. I am a hospice nurse so emotional trauma goes with the territory. We have a different drug that causes loss of memory we use in people undergoing surgery. A significant percentage of people actually come out of anaestheisa during surgery and have to be put back under. This drug is given in case that happens so they don't remember. Also used for "conscious sedation" type surgeries. Stickler is that it does not work for everyone, some people still remember the events. Just an FYI.

    --
    Wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair and all the terrible things that happen to us, come because we actually dese
  53. No more war by kop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Progress
    First we mechanize war, so we dont have to die.
    Then we make it long distance, so we dont have to see who we kill.
    Then we shut up the press, so we dont have to hear about it.
    Now we pop a pil, so we don't know its there.

    1. Re:No more war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucken right!

  54. Welcome to Roboland... by geo_2677 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just doing that; turning humans into machines. How do you value joy without pain.

  55. Obsession with medication by Matterball · · Score: 1

    Right, so we have pills that will "solve" erectile dysfunction, pills that will "cure" depression, and now pills that will "help" people who have undergone trauma. How long before we have pills that will do everything else, or have it become accepted to sprinkle something on your cornflakes that will increase your ability to slog through work, pills that will blot out a bad day at the office, pills you can take to get through arguments with your girlfriend... While I appreciate that some things are harder to get through than others, it is probably better in the long run for people to take responsibility for their own mental functioning without treating the body as a machine - how long before it's considered unnatural to live without supplements?

  56. Soma! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to brave new world!

    Have some soma!

  57. I'll wait for the movie by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Where the guy wakes up, doesn't realise he was part of a consipracy to blow up the whitehouse, turn on the TV to see CNN reporting the whitehouse is on fire.

    Blah blah he finds out he was drugged.

    These drugs are sick man, sick!

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  58. Equilibrium, anyone? by zqad · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of so may things that's just plainly wrong. Take for example the film "equilibrium". I assume noone want to live like that. Furthermore, we have the "psychological treatment" lobotomy.

    This treatment isn't meant permanent, like the ones mentioned, but how do we know for sure that the effect doesn't stay for longer then intended? Or can it cause flashbacks?

    I feel, therefore I am.

    1. Re:Equilibrium, anyone? by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      You are guilty of sense crimes.

  59. Question... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Why is it that My Lai is mentioned all the time but the Tet '68 mass killings by the Communists in and around Hue are never mentioned?

    During the months and years that followed the battle, dozens of mass graves were discovered in and around Hue containing nearly 3000 civilians. In some of the mass graves victims were found bound together; some appeared tortured; others were even reported to have appeared buried alive. Estimates vary on the number executed, with a low of a couple hundred to a high of several thousand. Commonly villiage leaders who had not shown satisfactory Communist leanings during the time the Republic of South Vietnam ruled the area were murdered.

    The NLF set up provisional authorities shortly after capturing Hue, and was charged with removing the existing government administration from power within the city and replacing it with a revolutionary administration. Working from lists of "cruel tyrants and reactionary elements" previously developed by VC intelligence officers, many people were to be rounded up following the initial hours of the attack. These included South Vietnamese soldiers, civil servants, political party members, local religious leaders, American civilians and other foreigners. These individuals, according to VC documents captured during and after the siege, were to be taken out of the city and held and punished for their "crimes against the Vietnamese people".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_at_Hue
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy /cg-66.htm

    At My Lai between 350 and 510 civilians were killed, so the Hue/Tet killings were much bloodier and more orchestrated, so why is My Lai always brought up when the Communists killed more?

    I don't think that a drug like this will be used to facilitate war crimes because a Military needs discipline and rape/murder goes against discipline. An Army is a mob and shows some mob behaviors which are tempered in a military unit by training, routine and dispiline, the US military, NATO, Russian, Israeli and those militaries which closely follow these doctrines will not allow a drug which breaks down the discipline to be dispensed.

    1. Re:Question... by Rakishi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At My Lai between 350 and 510 civilians were killed, so the Hue/Tet killings were much bloodier and more orchestrated, so why is My Lai always brought up when the Communists killed more?

      Because US soldiers didn't kill them and we're not in Vietnam discussing the Vietnamese government? Amazing isn't it, when discussing the potential consequences of something regarding the US military we look at past actions by the US military and not some other group... simply amazing.

      I don't think that a drug like this will be used to facilitate war crimes because a Military needs discipline and rape/murder goes against discipline.

      Why? Soldiers kill all the time, they are ordered to and do so.

      An Army is a mob and shows some mob behaviors which are tempered in a military unit by training, routine and dispiline, the US military, NATO, Russian, Israeli and those militaries which closely follow these doctrines will not allow a drug which breaks down the discipline to be dispensed.

      This will reinforce discipline, your logic is actually proving how useful this would be. Your well trained army can be ordered to kill civilians, assuming it is trained well enough. However, some may feel remorse and this will cause long term problems (for the army as a whole and for the individual soldiers). Now with a magic pill, this problem is solved. They can order as many killings as they want without any of those nasty consequences. Of course, as soon as such usage becomes public knowledge recruitment numbers would probably plummet but that wasn't what you were arguing.

    2. Re:Question... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      Military needs discipline and rape/murder goes against discipline


      Wasn't it exactly military discipline that made not a single one of them object to what others were doing? It seems it was exactly because they were disciplined solders that they could rationalize it as "just following orders" and "helping out my bubby". Discipline means "any training intended to produce a specific character or pattern of behaviour" so the same patterns of behavior ("follow orders","don't be a pussy","don't be a snitch") that help one be a good soldier can also make one into a good cold-blooded killer.

    3. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At My Lai between 350 and 510 civilians were killed, so the Hue/Tet killings were much bloodier and more orchestrated, so why is My Lai always brought up when the Communists killed more?

      Becuase unlike the Communists, the US were supposed to be the good guys? Where did all this moral relativism come from? Of course the VC killed a lot of people; they were bastards.

    4. Re:Question... by silicon_id · · Score: 1
      Military needs discipline and rape/murder goes against discipline.
      Right, which is why I keep reading articles about soldiers raping and murdering civilians in foreign bases all over the world?

      And those are only the ones that have gotten press...

      I think you must never have served in the military as I have. You would know if you had that your statements are just optimistic wishful thinking of a world that isn't. In this world, militaries from ALL nations have been shown throught recorded history to be capable of the most brutal and disgusting behavior imaginable. And you want to give them a pill that makes it easier? Sheesh...
  60. Canada pill to forget trauma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Thats good news. Canadians are pain in th a**.

  61. NOT an "Amnesia Pill" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is NOT a "forget pill" or "amnesia pill" or anything like that. It's a drug that reduces feelings of stress by blocking the action of adrenaline and other stress hormones. It's also used to treat things like stage fright. It does not prevent you from remembering things, it just reduces the feelings of stress often associated with "flashbulb memories" (memories formed under emotional circumstances that seem vivid for years afterward-- "Everyone remembers where they were when they heard Kennedy was shot.").

    The FDA, or any equivalent agency, would never ever ever approve a "forget pill." Such a thing would serve no medical purpose and would fly in the face of modern medical ethics.

    FYI, they're talking about Propanolol. Quoth the Wiki:
    Propranolol, acting as a beta-blocker, has also been shown to have an effect on the formation of memories with strong emotional content. During very emotional or traumatic times, adrenaline and noradrenaline are released from the adrenal medulla which activate beta receptors in the brain. The effect is to give the associated memories more "force" due to the strong emotional content and subsequent beta-receptor activation. Propranolol blocks beta-receptor action, and thereby reduces or eliminates the emotional component of the memory. The effect is to make the memory more mundane.

    Remember, "science news" is just as bad as regular news.

  62. no more bland TV courtroom dramas! by musicismath70 · · Score: 1

    does this mean Law and Order SVU will finally be cancelled? finally.

  63. And don't forget... by Trejkaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    One for the lady too.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:And don't forget... by Gwyn_232 · · Score: 1

      No, she gets GHB.

    2. Re:And don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One for the lady too.

      So you're going to make a crude pass at her and then offer her a pill after she rejects you? That's going to go well...

  64. Easily available already by Mprx · · Score: 1

    Propranolol is very cheap, unscheduled, and available from most online pharmacies. If you want to try it you shouldn't have any difficultly acquiring it. It does not make you forget things, only makes the memories less emotional. If anything it should make victims of crimes *more* reliable witnesses. The only ethical concern is military use, for everything else it is a very good idea.

  65. Wonder if it could suppress the bullch*t by seabreezemm · · Score: 1

    of an exwife! Now that would make it atleast half my stuff!

    --
    Karma: a simple way of silencing those with unpopular views regardless how correct or just that view might be.
  66. A VERY old drug by Shook · · Score: 1
    Something buried deep in the article that is worth mentioning. Propranolol was put on the market in 1964 and has been widely used for high blood pressure and migraine headaches. The history of propranolol is here. My 10-year-old sister-in-law is on it for migraines. Her 8-year-old cousin was on it for several years for a heart arrythmia prior to getting surgery. Newer beta blockers like metoprolol (with lower side effects) are universally reccommended (with a few exceptions) to patients with heart disease. To answer several posters questions: the side effects are well-known. The biggest includes dizziness from low blood pressure (if you had normal BP to start with). It can exacerbate asthma in people with this condition. Although it is associated with exercise intolerance (because of an inability to raise your heart rate), beta blockers' traditional association with depression and fatigue has been more controversial lately.

    But I would agree with the statement in the article that one or two pills would be fairly harmless as far as side effects go. This is a drug that thousands of people have stayed on for decades.

    Someone brought up the issue of attacking a treated victim's testimony in court. I wouldn't be surprised if this new data means lawyers will start attacking the testimony of all witnesses on beta blockers for whatever reason. And I would bet probably 25% of Congress (I'm guessing based on age and sex) is on a beta blocker.

  67. Alcohol by Pizaz · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that alcohol if taken in very large quantities has this effect. Ever go out on the town, make an ass of yourself (as told by your friends) but not rememeber any of it?

    1. Re:Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider when a person receives some very bad news (gets fired, friend or relative dies, etc) and they go out drinking to "forget." I guess the whole "drowning your sorrows" cliche has more merit than we thought.

  68. Or by Shook · · Score: 1
    Or to summarize:

    1. Find a new use for an old drug that costs 22 cents a pill.

    2. Give it out one or two pills at a time.

    3. ???

    4. Profit

  69. This is scary stuff by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A rape victim is also sadly a witness. While it would be nice if we could just get rapist on technical details often to proof that it is rape the jury or judge needs to hear the victims account. Often it is a vital piece of the evidence, even with complete physical evidence a victims account is still needed because it makes clear the terrible nature of the crime.

    So what happens when the victim takes this drug and has artificial manipulation of her memories?

    Some comment that the drug does not erase the memory but only doesn't make it a traumatic memory.

    Well, that is part of the defence by the doctor involved. The other part? That he doesn't care about how well his victims will be able to testify.

    This is not even like he is curing the symptom not the disease, he is merely numbing the symptom. The disease, rapist, is left unharmed and can strike again and again.

    This is nasty stuff. It reminds me of all those Sci-Fi stories where you have a civilisation so perfect and peacefull that they become unable to deal with violence. Cue someone taking advantage of it. If rape is no longer traumatic should it even be a crime? We already got judges around the world judging rape as natural for a healthy human male. Now they can just say, "Oh take a pill you hysteric girl." Far fetched? Check up on the practice of rape victims being the ones punished. No I am not talking about muslim countries. I am talking western countries who did stuff like lock rape victims up in mental wards and or sterelize them.

    We need pain, it is an incentive to stop whatever is causing the pain. The cure is not to make rape memories less traumatic. The cure is to elimanate rape. Yes it is very bad for the victim but we need her trauma to convict the criminals and prevent them from being able to do it over and over again.

    This is wrong. Hopefully smarter people then me will realize this and impose very strict guidelines on the use. Or maybe we should improve our legal system that rape victims do not have to wait years and years and keep their memories fresh before the trials and re-trials are finally over.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  70. Friends and Relatives by Redwin · · Score: 1

    What about close friends and family who know that an event occured and possibly end up knowing more than the original person themselves. Take for example a senario where a person was raped, and the culprit was caught and convicted. Everyone would know what he looks like and who he is. The victim takes the pill to "forget" the event, and therefore doesn't make the association with that persons face and what happened.

    Later that person and a group of friends go out and see a person who looks very simlar to the rapist which stirs emotional responses in everyone else except the victim. If that person enquires as to what everyone else is uneasy about what do they say? "Sorry, it is for your own good we don't explain it to you" "Nothing, you are just imagining it"?

    --
    Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
  71. Except for the Dutch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why? Soldiers kill all the time, they are ordered to and do so.

    Except for Dutch soldiers. They don't want to kill, and especially don't want to get killed. To achieve this, they normally are very friendly and underarmed. The Dutch government is very scared of body bags, so they send them only to areas where there is no real danger.

  72. As a psychiatrist, I prescibe this all the time... by wundabread · · Score: 1

    For HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE! This is a beta blocker, and millions of people take these medications daily, and this is the first I've ever heard about an effect on memory.

    The effect of this medication is to lower heart rate, which may help dull that "adreneline" response to remembering a bad memory, but to say it erases it is just silly.

    I'm highly doubtful about this 20 patient study (which is almost too small to even call a pilot study).

  73. People by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

    The trauma pill is people

  74. Equilibrium anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess most of those BOFH's around would love significant amount of prozium pills to insult those lusers even more.

    Or... Maybe not...

  75. Ineffective by rdmiller3 · · Score: 1
    The article said that this "Propanolol" (normally used to treat high blood pressure) was tested on rape victims. Eight were given the drug while 14 received only a placebo. No difference was seen in the frequency or intensity of flashback episodes.

    So why are they reporting that it works?

    1. Re:Ineffective by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1
      So why are they reporting that it works?

      But they don't report that. From the article, I quote: "Will it work? It is too soon to say."

      No difference was seen in the frequency or intensity of flashback episodes.

      Now, to pick a nit, it is incorrect to say that no difference was seen in the frequency of flashback episodes. The article clearly states there was a difference, but that the difference was not statistically signifcant. Given the very low number of participants in the study, it would be relatively surprising to have seen a statistical difference, those folks need to do a signficantly larger study to make any sense of it. I agree with you that, by itself, this is not cause for optimism, but nor is it a direct cause for pessimism. In light of the authors previous studies, I think it's still an interesting and possibly productive line of research.

  76. I for one welcome our new drug kingpin overlords by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Not a day goes by that I don't thank the stars above for all these pills that help me .... uh... help..to...um.. what was I saying?

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  77. Buddhism by mfh · · Score: 1

    It can't work because it doesn't exist.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Buddhism by Minwee · · Score: 1
      "It can't work because it doesn't exist."

      At least not until someone researches the Meditation technology and founds it.

      After that it will spread like wildfire along your roads and sea trade routes.

    2. Re:Buddhism by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      +5: "We care for our brothers and sisters of the faith."

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:Buddhism by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      The ironic thing about your comment is that you sound like someone who has reached Enlightenment.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
  78. Aldous Huxley on the (then) future by beelers · · Score: 1

    I think Huxley foresaw this in "Brave New World." From the foreword of the First Perennial Classics edition published in 1998. "The love of servitude cannot be established except as the result of a deep, personal revolution in human minds and bodies. To bring about that revolution we require, among others, the following discoveries and inventions. First, a greatly improved technique of suggestion--through infant conditioning and, later, with the aid of drugs, such as scopolamine." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopolamine

  79. Re:There's Evidence That Suggests Forgetting is Go by Mad_Rain · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you look at treatments for PTSD, you'll see that psychotherapy hasn't been proven to be helpful.

    On the contrary - a brief scholar.google.com search has a number of articles by researchers suggesting that psychotherapy helps a number of people with PTSD, whatever the cause may be.

    The National Center for PTSD has information for Veterans Affairs staff on how to treat returning Iraq War Vets, and it includes mental health counseling, including individual counseling, group therapy, and family therapy. (Disclaimer: I am a former VA psych intern)

    --
    "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  80. Re:New Scientist had good coverage of this last ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A polygraph isn't even accurate. It's easy too fool and gives false positives. It's a worthless machine that as far as I know is only used in U.S.A.

  81. Good thing or Bad thing? by thewiz · · Score: 1

    I see there are quite a few people arguing wether or not this pill would be a good thing or a bad thing. While we could argue ad infinitum about this when it comes to soldiers, rape victims, etc; I see the medication as a good thing for people who undergo traumatic medical procedures. Studies during the past decade have shown that people who undergo things like heart surgery, organ transplants, chemotherapy, cancer surgery, etc experience PTSD due to the physical trauma the body goes through. After having several open-heart surgeries to correct a defect I was born with, I spent most of my life depressed and dealing with PTSD, although I didn't know it at the time.
    Now that I'm getting treatment for the depression and PTSD, I'm happier, healthier, and a whole lot nicer to be around. I'd rather have the medication available so others won't have to go through the hell I did.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  82. Gov. Roofies? by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    We already have this; Roofies are banned, and for good reason.
    A tramatic event needs to be remembered and dealt with.

    Why not take rape victims for electro shock therapy, make them forget the last 24-36 hours?
    What a great concept; or we can take the enemy combatants and have them "forget" the trama of torture.
    Next we can grab anyone off the street, apply torture, have them sign a confession, mind wipe them.
    Instant zero unsolved crimes!
    What a great and successful police force.
    I feel safe already!

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  83. Brilliant! by ladyKae · · Score: 0

    So now after the rape victim has been through court and the rapist has been convicted. The victim takes the pill, the rapist appeals (on whatever grounds) and as the victim can now no longer remember anything the rapist gets off...

    How long before 'this' is the new date rape drug

    --

    Smile, it confuses people

  84. A gramme is better than a damn! :D

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
  85. So are all those ravers self medicating for PTSD? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    MDMA (better known as "ecstacy"), is currently being studied for exactly this purpose:

    http://www.maps.org/mdma/
    http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/news/maps_mdmaprot ocol_approved.htm
    http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/mdma_research 4.shtml

    So it looks like the drugs have actually won the "War on Drugs"...:)

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  86. Just take a pill for everything! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are tired don't sleep more, it will be a waste of time, drink a lot of coffee instead.

    If your get stomach pains after drinking too much coffee, don't stop drinking coffee, take a pill instead.

    If your stomach medicine has some side effects, take another pill to alleviate those side effects.

    If your girlfriend left you and you are sad, don't talk to your friends and don't try to find another girlfriend instead. Just take an anti-depressant.

    If your life is very stressfull, don't try things like finding a more comfortable job, just take a lot pills instead.

    By treating symptoms instead of their causes, you will spend tons of money on medicine and your will be in a horrible shape healthwise. But hey, at least pharmaceutical companies will be happy!

  87. Re:Friends and Relatives by vidarh · · Score: 1

    RTFA. The article explicitly mention that this has nothing to do with forgetting an event, but with reducing the physical/emotional response to recall of the event. If anything, reducing the trauma of remembering something could very well make it possible for people to remember more detail.

  88. Manipulation without knowledge is bad by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    Maybe suffering is a way to finally learn not to put yourself in such situation where you will suffer? If you see it in a broader perspective, there is always a reason.

    There are totally safe and natural ways to ease suffering from depression to shock, which is currently being used in most catastrophe-stricken areas. There is no need to use drugs to "fix" your memory, mind or body, through breathing excercises the Art of Living is teaching, you can breathe out all the stress. Millions of people have been helped, among them thousands of people suffering from shock after catastrophes.

    Yes, it may take a bit more time and effort. Valuable things usually do. However, a quick fix, does not cure the root of the problem: war and the mind clinging on negativities and calamites. If ten people give you compliments all day, and one give you a bad compliment, which will you rememember? Yes, we need to change our minds, but through time-tested and safe methods such as yoga, not through drugs. Reducing the intelligent human being into a drug-addicted animal is not going to solve our root problems, only make them worse in the long run.

  89. Can't wait for this drug abuse by smchris · · Score: 1

    What drug do you get for the trauma of being jailed for abusing PTSD drugs?

    What will the mental landscape be of a long-term PTSD drug abuser?

    Presumably, the military super-psycho killer will at least have memories of burning these women and children. So soldiers will be on them for life to kill the middle-of-the-night flashbacks?

    Either that, or they will come up with a drug that _permanently_ lets people learn from the moment that killing people is juusstt ffiiinnnneee. Yeah, I want to work in the cube next to that dude when he gets discharged.

    In civilian use, who hands them out? Night psychiatrist on duty at every precinct station?

    Oh, yeah. Distributing this stuff throughout society will be just great.

    But it does open artistic opportunities like "Mi Lai, the Musical Comedy As I Remember It.", which I suppose a hip crowd of PSTD drug abusers would find hilarious.

  90. Re:There's Evidence That Suggests Forgetting is Go by putko · · Score: 1

    Sorry -- I didn't mean "psychotherapy", but rather "psychiatry".

    Cognitive-behavioral is present-focused, and seems to get much better results than the Freudian stuff.

    I can't comprehend how dwelling on horrific memories (e.g. how you felt when your buddy got burned alive while you watched, pinned down by a sniper) could help at all to get on with one's life. Yet that is the sort of things that psychiatrists encourage.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  91. Numbing the masses by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    How many drugs do people need to take to function 'normally?' I am no Scientologist, but I think that drugs are not the instant solution for every emotional or physical problem we face.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  92. ethical dilemas? what are those by bobamu · · Score: 1
    As ever any technology is ethically neutral, it's what the lunatics choose to do with it that makes the difference.

    I can see that this could be useful to someone in small doses to get them through the day when "too much" has recently happened.

    I can also see the horror potential, already some folks can justify or deny anything or at least pigeonhole contrary experience to an inconsequential or 'unrealistic' perspective, but many who experienced the day would remember it all, with nobody to remember how what happened really felt did it really matter that anything happened at all?

    This will be an authoritarians wet dream in a handy consumable capsule.

    "Drink this citizen, you WILL feel happy."

  93. Maybe.. by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of Freud and repressed memories? Here is my take on it:

    #1 Pretending it never happened doesn't help.
    #2 Going into every detail and clinging to the bad memories making them your own, incorporating them in your very personality, also doesn't help.

    In #1 you are repressing the memory. But it still lingers in your mind-body system, so it will affect you in daily situations until you finally "digest" the event. Sometimes this will happen, and you will have to face the pain, shame or whatever feelings you attach to it, again, and realize it is just.. feelings, it is not really you, it is a passing sensation if you just let it go.

    In #2 you never fully "digest" the event. You relive it again, and again, boring your friends with it again and again, making them take up the subject when they meet you, again and again. You undergo therapy for years and years, never feeling fully healed. It becomes part of your conscious personality, so you are never really free from it, until you let it go.

    Ok, so I made to references to "digesting" the event. Whatever that means, it's just a word I came up with now. I believe only spirituality can really help. Knowing that you are not the event, what has happened is done, time to move on. It's sort of a middle path between #1 and #2, where you take on life from here and now onward, because you know you are much more than just that event, but also accepting it is part of your past.

    "Digesting" the event can even make you realize something good has come out of it! Many times it takes alot of time for people to see good in a bad event, but there always is some good coming out of every event. The more spiritually aware you are, the quicker you will "look back" at the event, and the less disturbed you will be from it.

    Personally, I recomment Art of Living course, which will relieve all levels of stress and give a excellent health/mind benefits for those who continue with doing yoga and breathing excercises.

    1. Re:Maybe.. by putko · · Score: 1

      Just look at the article I linked to. Congnitive therapy seems to work.

      But remembering the horrific stuff and the bad feelings (ala psychiatry) leads to trouble in the present.

      Freud made that stuff up. You can verify his theories. In fact, not believing in them is explained by the theory. There's no proof that doing what Freud would want you to do helps. In this way, Freudianism is a religion.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  94. Obligatory Office Space Quote by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    PETER: But is there any way that you, you could just sock me out so there's no way that I'll know I'm at work? Right here? (points to his head) Can I just come home and think I've been fishing all day or something?

    Let me know when they have a pill for that.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  95. The real question is ... by lucm · · Score: 1

    ... would you take the blue pill or the red pill?

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  96. Treating the root is always better by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    The really scary argument is: If rape isn't traumatic, what's the harm? Why shouldn't we make it legal?

    The real disease is not the rapist, the person, but the mindset which is no doubt having some sort of trauma of its own. By drugging our members of society, we're sort of covering our problems with the proverbial blanket, not really dealing with the root.

    When this is done in the individual, the problems are still there, it's just not showing up too often, and the person is having less of a human experience, living a drugged and cut-off reality.

    Doing this on a society-basis is already on the way, with prozac being given to small kids. This is reverting humanity to animalism, because we are unable to deal with it in an intelligent and compassionate manner, a humane manner. We're treating humans like animals, thus reducing the "humanness" in us all. This is what we're teaching the coming generation.

    But there are solutions that are actually working, and is actually promoting human values instead of taking easy short-cuts which leads to dead-ends. Yoga and breathing excercises are proven to reduce stress and depression, and also giving all-round health-mind benefits. It has been used for thousands of years and are safe and time-tested ways for a better life. Its roots are really the first science on earth, the Vedas, which means knowledge and was the first science to really acknowledge the scientific method. Every emotion has a corresponding rythm of the breath you see, so through the breath and changing the rythm consciously, we can have effect on the mind. While changing the mind with the mind is more difficult. Check out Art of Living courses near you.

    1. Re:Treating the root is always better by Forbman · · Score: 1

      There's "depression", and there's Major Depression. Sorry, but thinking happy thoughts, stretching the body, etc. doesn't do shit for Major Depression. Spend some time with someone diagnosed with Major Depression.

      Those things can work for the people who need some sort of handholding or assurance.

      I'd give just about anything to turn back the clocks before 1998, so that my wife could beg out of going to Guam to work on the KAL 800 crash there.

      As much as I might want to think that it's just "all in her mind", I realize that all I have to go on are my perceptions I get from her descriptions and any of my preconceived notions or assumptions, which just don't amount to jack shit, really.

      So all I can do is just keep saying, "Honey, I love you. Hopefully it'll get better one of these days."

      Been shot at by people actively trying to shoot you? Your perceptions of things will be way different than watching a movie about it thinking that you are so right and correct by saying, "duck, you stupid idiot!" before some guy gets capped with a headshot. So until I've actually gone through that situation, I'll defer more towards those that have been through exactly that rather than any armchair Slashdotter or general.

  97. Soma by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

    "Kiss me till I'm in a coma.
    Hug me honey. Snuggle bunny.
    Love's as good as SOMA"

    Aldous Huxley - A Brave New World

    --
    You say you want a revolution....
  98. Backup by peu · · Score: 1

    1. Insert tape backup
    2. next day
    3. Insert tape backup
    4. Crash
    5. Restore from Tape
    6. Tape fails
    7. Take Pill
    8. Insert tape backup
    9. loop

  99. Memory Pill.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHat the... I think most would agree that while this is possibly a constructive development that encourages further study, what is needed by the masses is just the oposite.
    How about a pill for increasing mental clarity, accuity and recall?!

    ol' whatshisname

  100. This is going to be bigger then penicillin!! by Give+Me+a+T,+Give+me · · Score: 1

    We should call it um...... STUMMIES!

  101. "How to learn" class by QMO · · Score: 1

    One thing that should be taught first in universities and schools is "how to learn"

    There are such classes. At least two of the colleges that I taught at had such a course, along with "how to learn" being a major emphasis in many gen ed classes.

    There are many difficulties, though.

    One is that professors are just as human as students, and nearly as likely not to know how to learn, let alone know how to teach learning.

    Another is that, "how to learn" is (IMO) much more than just a set of techniques such as those that you described, it is a mindset (an attitude, a way of looking at the world). Mindsets are hard to transfer.
    I have known (both as a teacher and as a student) students that outwardly use all of the techniques that you described, and had other good habits, and still don't learn. (Perhaps part of the problem is the myth that grades measure learning, so many peope study for grades, instead of for learning.)

    Our first few years of life vitrually all of us are amazingly good at learning. For some reason (I expect because learning is hard work) nearly all of us slow way down, and many of us stop.

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  102. Like it or not by QMO · · Score: 1

    Rape is considered bad because of religion.

    (Then again, so is murder.)

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:Like it or not by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      bullshit.

      Rape is considered bad because it inflicts immense psychological trauma on the victim.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Like it or not by Descalzo · · Score: 1
      Please explain.

      I imagine that you are saying this because it started out as a religious taboo, but I am not sure why you are saying it. So before I start telling you you're wrong, I would like to know what you're thinking

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    3. Re:Like it or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey wow, a brand new troll!

      "XXX is considered bad because of religion. Then again, so is murder."

      If we use this one more, it could be big like hot grits and old people in Korea jokes.

    4. Re:Like it or not by QMO · · Score: 1

      I thought that it was kind of obvious, but I'll try to explain a little.

      There are (and have been, and probably will be) cultures that don't find rape or murder so horrible.

      IMO our culture does find them horrible because of the religious teachings that are behind the traditional moral ideals in this culture.

      In case you're wondering, I won't feel bad if anyone disagrees. (Though I know that will disappoint some people.)

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    5. Re:Like it or not by Descalzo · · Score: 1
      I see it this way: Rape is a violation of rights and justice. Religions (at least the christianity, the only thing I know) condemns the violation of rights, and commands justice.

      Our society also respects rights and seeks justice. While this may have its roots in the Judeo-Christian ethic, it is not dependent on it anymore.

      So I guess my point is that while it may have started out as religious, it is not so any longer.

      That said, I do believe that one reason we have seen such an increase in crime is because of our general abandoment of the foundation on which our system of justice and right is built.

      So I guess I just agreed and disagreed with you about the same thing. Can I do that? Is that allowed?

      That's one thing I noticed about Star Trek: The Next Generation. There is an 'atheistic morality' about it that kind of bothers me. I find it somehow hard to believe that such a society could exist. I think that in a society where everyone is enlightened past belief in God would be that moral. But then, I have to admit my bias.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
  103. Hope the rapists never get their hands on this by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    Magic pill indeed...if it erases short-term memories of traumatic events, it would be the ultimate date-rape drug. GHB (the date-rape drug du jour) already does this to some extent...a drug whose actual purpose is to do this would be horrible if diverted.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    1. Re:Hope the rapists never get their hands on this by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Drs and dentists already use various antihypnotic drugs to reduce/eliminate your short-term memory when doing certain short-term, but invasive, procedures, in addition to anesthesia.

      The funny thing is, you need to take these drugs before the stressful situation. This is a new drug that could help wipe out things after the fact.

      We all can convince ourselves out of some degree of bad shit after the fact, but the things that tend to induce PTSD are at a whole different level (yes, WAYYY beyond psycho hose monster girlfriends/boyfriends, etc).

      Besides, most good things also can have a negative thing about them, too. They're usually double-edged swords. So, will we let our fear of potential bad uses outweigh the potential good it could do? Probably.

    2. Re:Hope the rapists never get their hands on this by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

      So, will we let our fear of potential bad uses outweigh the potential good it could do? Probably.

      I hope not. I just hope this drug is as restricted as hospital-strength narcotics are...locked in a hospital, requiring supervision for access and administration. If they let people take these pills home, there could be trouble, but you rarely see drugs like Fentanyl (which has similar access controls as what I just described) diverted onto the street, even though many addicts would just love to get some.

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  104. Re:Bah... useless - suggestions by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    Selegiline (aka Deprenyl, Eldepryl) is a selective MAO-B inihibtor used to treat Parkinsons & Alzheimers, but has also been shown to improve memory (and increase longevity and sexual activity ... in rats).
    Combinations of acetyl-L-carnitine, alpha lipoic acid, and CoQ10 have shown similiar effects (link , link)

    Granted, we now have a bunch of very smart, long-lived, god-awful horny-all-the-time rats running around. You got a problem with that?

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  105. I have been taking this for years by lagerbottom · · Score: 1

    But I always called it beer.

    --
    "He was a wise man who invented beer." - Plato
  106. I prefer by QMO · · Score: 1

    "He who controls the past, commands the future. He who commands the future, conquers the past." - Kane

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  107. Hmm, yourself by QMO · · Score: 1

    "Nobody forces rape victims to endure this or that."

    A straigtforward definition of rape really does include the idea that it was forced.
    (e.g. from google: force (someone) to have sex against their will)

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:Hmm, yourself by ChaosCube · · Score: 1

      obviously the rape itself is forced. perhaps you didn't read the parent, or the rest of my post? it was very quaint of you to include a definition/description of rape. very clever, even though I was not referring to that. Remember, the article and parent was about emotions and memory.

      --
      BDR Gear
      Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
    2. Re:Hmm, yourself by QMO · · Score: 1

      OK, but I still think that if your post (ggp) was not meant to imply that rape doesn't force anything on the victim, you should have been more clear.

      Should I have known that you didn't mean that, even though you weren't clear? Maybe on some other forum, or if I actually knew you.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  108. Foot in mouth pill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be great to give to my wife after I've made a particularly stupid statement.

    "Whoops. Did I say that out loud? Here honey, take a pill."

    This should work way better than my recent attempts to use my jedi master voice:
    ME: "You will forget I said anything. You will not remind me of this when we are having an unrelated argument. You will not think less of me or harbor any resentment."

    HER: "What are you some kind of a Jedi waving your hand around like that? I'm a Toydarian. Your mind tricks don't work on me."

  109. Oh, Dude, you could not be more wrong by DG · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the major discoveries of last century was just how pervasive and powerful psychic trauma is to people, especially soldiers, police officers, and emergency rescue personel.

    It is way, way, WAY more common than was ever suspected, has NOTHING to do with one's strength of character or moral fibre, and can be crippling in ways that physical injury can never be.

    There is NO choice in who will wind up with PTSD, and little to no way to predict when a particular individual will come down with it, or how strongly. It is insidious, often nearly invisible, and powerful.

    I have seen many friends struggle with the effects of PTSD, and it is not at all a laughing matter.

    Happily, there are techinques to help people deal with it, and to lessen the impact it has on their lives. Two books I highly recommend are On Killing and On Combat, by Lt Col Dave Grossman. These books are, to the best of my understanding, the first books to really deal with the psychic cost of killing, and how to minimize it if you are forced to deal in violence.

    They aren't perfect - Col Grossman makes much of the desensitizing nature of certain video games (which I think is overblown) and parts of On Combat start to read like advertisements for his consulting agency, but these are required reading for anybody in the military or law enforcement trades - or for anybody who thinks that PTSD victims in any way choose their fate.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  110. Adversity and stress only make us stronger by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

    I have mod points, but I felt that I might be better able to help here by depositing my own $.02.

    I went through a lot of stress last year. Among other things, between being laid off, a girlfriend who was completely off her rocker (but who wouldn't accept any help), evacuating New Orleans, and eventually settling down in a strange new city where I know absolutely nobody, I could probably say that last year was probably the most stressful year I'd ever had. That said, I can't imagine not having those memories of the events and the memories of the ammount of stress I was under. Although I probably wouldn't elect to experience any of those events again, I'm not sorry that they occurred. You see, because of everything that happened, I was able to find out just what kind of person I really am.

    Not to sound too mystical about it, but I was able to find a certain inner strength that has been lacking from my personality for a large part of my life. I'm sure somebody wiser than I has said it before, but through adversity will we find strength. As a certain starship captian once put it: my pain -- that is, my painful memories -- is what makes me who I am. People may not realize it, but those rough experiences will make us stronger than we ever were before.

    I think the idea of a trauma pill is ridiculous. Anti-depressants? Sure, why not? Sometimes people do need some help coping with the stress in their life, but to just ignore it completely - to forget that it is even there? Well, that's just a bad idea.

    --

    If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  111. Hell night by BrockH01 · · Score: 1

    I had the very same thing happen to me my freshman year at The Citadel. The Citadel is a military college in South Carolina known for having the toughest fourth class system. Essentially the four academic years are broken into classes (seniors are first class; juniors are second class, etc.). At any rate, the first day of your freshman year concludes with Hell Night. There's all sorts of physical training, yelling, and various challenges. Well the funny thing is I don't remember Hell Night at all. I recall one of the sergeants kicking in my door and telling us to get down to the quad (the courtyard in the barracks), but I don't remember a thing about that. Some of the upper classmen took pictures and I saw them later on. There was a picture of me doing push ups and I couldn't even recall doing any push ups that night. It was completely blocked out. I don't have any PTSD symptoms, it's just interesting what the human mind decides to store and what it deems does not need to stay.

    --
    To shreds you say...
  112. Here's a Shortcut... by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If people really feel they need a pill (ie. "quick fix") for every problem that life hands them, I've got a solution. One pill that takes care of any problem. Permananently. It's called Cyanide.

    Jesus H. K-RISTE!!! Emotional pain can be quite debilitating and there are many things people shouldn't have to go through. But doesn't anyone find it the least bit frightening that we, as a society, are trying to find ways to remove every negative thing life throws at us? Is that really a "good thing"? I remember a particularly painful breakup I went through and it took me a very long time to get over it. I certainly would have been tempted to take that pill when I was experiencing the pain. However, looking at it a decade and a half on, I'm glad that such a thing was not available. Had I chosen to forget that trauma (yes, it's mild by comparison to PTSD or rape) I would not have developed as a person and would likely have not been able to form healthy relationships later. I suspect that there are aspects of negative experiences that build us up into better people. Whether it's a rape victim who channels his or her rage into working to protect others from the same fate, or a soldier who tells the truth about what really happened on the field in an extended conflagration. Pumping these people with pills would take that away from society as a whole. And that is a BAD THING. We really need to question the use of medication for everything. It's gone completely out of control and mostly due to profit motive of the pharma industry.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Here's a Shortcut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up idiot. The pharma industry as you call it, made me and many other investors a few thousand dollars last year. Do something productive hippie. Get into the market and do something that actually benefits society instead of whining on Slashdot.

    2. Re:Here's a Shortcut... by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Well, a broken heart is one thing. You just have to get over that one on your own.

      Dealing with trauma patients on a daily basis and finally having too much of it, shooting someone to death in the line of duty (and not being able to get the face of the victim out of your head), getting raped (and living the rest of your life not being able to trust men at anything more than a superficial level), etc., and not ever being able to get away from it, well, that is more what PTSD is like. It's like a bad feedback loop that has no dampening features in it, like it's almost at a harmonic frequency being driven by inputs at that harmonic freq.

      Having PTSD kind of stops you at that point, and you can't really get past it. Sure, it's all in one's head. Now, if that ex-girlfriend had seriously mindfucked you for two or three years, and finally left you hanging high and dry, perhaps with some measure of public humiliation involved, that is different.

      PTSD, and dealing with it, is not like a rape victim channeling rage into anti-violence/pro-punishment advocacy. It is not Cindy Sheehan and her anti-Iraq Campaign campain [sic].

      As far as pumping people with these pills... OK, so it's better to have returning soldiers with battle rage that they can't just turn off running around society, eh? Army divorce rates right now are multiples higher than the standard population. Domestic violence in households with returning vets is a couple of multiples higher than the rest of the population. Etc.

      At least things are slightly better now than with post-Vietnam vets. We are aware that many soldiers returning from Iraq have been brainfucked by the situation, and need some help to decompress and leave Iraq behind, much more and longer than we previously thought, and the military branches and VA are trying to help out.

      Post-Vietnam fucked over the US for at least 15 years in many facets. At least this is one area where people are trying to be proactive.

      Besides... there are dentists who will essentially knock you out (liberal use of tranqs and antihypnotics) just to get your teeth cleaned. Is this necessarily a bad thing?

      As far as the Pharma industry... OK, so the pharma industry wants to push pills, and will not research anything that is not patentable, like instead of giving antidepressants for post partum depression, why not try to concoct a hormone treatment protocol to help reduce the kickback that this seems to be? Hormones aren't patentable (and probably too variable, too, but it doesn't stop HRT for estrogen or testosterone loss, either).

      It's not the use of medicines per se, it is the laissez-faire attitude about most doctors w.r.t. patients and drugs, and a certain lack of "pumptitude" in the population as a whole.
      What do you do with someone who comes in, marginally depressed, who just won't leave you alone until you give him a prescription for something? Same thing with the mom with kids who comes in a the slightest inkling of a runny nose. Eventually you cave and give them what they want, even though you know it's not what they need because they're just not listening to you.

      Blah blah blah about doctors knowing more about what their patients need and how arrogant it is blah blah blah.

      It's the American way now. Edge cases drive the rest of the society, instead of being isolated away from the system.

  113. Re:New Scientist had good coverage of this last ye by Unanimous+Cowturd · · Score: 0

    Another question: Do we really want this in the hands of the defense department? There would be even less qualms about sending people into harms' way if something like this were in their medicine cabinet.

    And don't think they wouldn't; they're quite willing to try and force potentially harmful vaccinations and other dubious treatments on their own personnel. Oh, and if something goes wrong, the drug company needn't worry - they probably won't be held accountable.

    This drug definitely has a downside.

  114. Re: Summarize and take notes by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

    Not to dispute any of your other points (which I agree with completely), but in my case I have always found that when a professor forced me to take notes (for example, required them to be turned in periodically for a grade), I was unable to remember most of what I'd written down unless I read them back again afterward, which in most cases I could have done just as easily by reading corresponding portion of the textbook. In other words, the act of taking notes actually prevented me from remembering the important parts of the lesson. I am sure that for some, and perhaps most, students, your method would help, but there are certainly some students who would have more trouble with a strict regime of note-taking than they would have if they simply paid attention in class without writing everything down.

    The reversal I experienced was probably due to my acutely visual memory, combined with the ability to deconstruct and visualize the professor's main points, adapting them to the format my memory was best at. In other words, I was already finding the main points and summarizing the lesson, and writing down the notes merely distracted me from doing so.

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  115. idunno, rape is a hard pill to swallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    idunno, rape is a hard pill to swallow

  116. Yea right by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Oh well rape, it's not that bad just give her a pill to shut her up. Boys will be boys.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  117. A whole new world of spam possibilities... by iBod · · Score: 1

    Can't you just see it?

    "Why bother ENLARGING your PENIS when you can simply STOP feeling INADEQUATE about it?" ...and so on!

  118. Correction by Gigaplex · · Score: 1

    On another list, someone looked into this after reading a similar article about this "magical pill". I haven't done all the research myself but I trust their conclusions: "It looks to me like they do not claim it reduces or erases the memory, more media hype. They say it lessens the hormonal reaction to the event (adrenaline etc) so that later when recalling it you do not get a replay of that same hormonal response. It is presently used for high blood pressure." Plus, this is not a good way to handle that problem anyway. Drugs are usually a bad solution to problems of the mind. Rather than reduce a person's awareness with drugs the person's awareness should be increased and they should be brought to the point where they can confront the memory.

  119. Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beta blockers have been in use for a very long time. Their main effect is to blunt the adrenaline (fight/flee) response. Overall they're very subtle drugs with no discernable effect on one's mental state. Public speakers and concert musicians will take them to control mild stage fright and essential tremor. In no way do they affect the memory of an event, stressful or otherwise.

    When I first started on beta blockers -- to control a minor arrythmia -- the only effect I saw, aside from the desired one, was that I had to start trimming my fingernails. Whatever nervous impulse caused me to worry off every little snag was gone.

    At least one doctor in England has proposed that every male over 40 should be on a statin drug, aspirin, and a beta blocker, since all these are well-tolerated and in most cases beneficial.

  120. Buddhism is not my path but... by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    I'm not well-versed in all of Buddhism, so take what I say with a grain of salt. It is just my uneducated words based from my experience, and an assumption that most schools of life are supposed to lead to 3 ends: end of suffering, acceptance of temporary suffering or lesser suffering.

    This is completely wrong. The first noble truth of Buddhism:
        1. All worldly life is unsatisfactory, disjointed, containing suffering.


    It is the wrong idea to take one point by itself and call it a day. You don't stop there, but start to study the rest of the scriptures and lectures by Buddhism. You don't cut a tiny branch off a giant tree and call it a lifeless, sorrowful, rotting piece of organic material, when the whole living tree is there for you to investigate.

    1. Re:Buddhism is not my path but... by Profound · · Score: 1

      You get happiness, just not now.

      Now = bad, after death = good (this sums up most religions, actually)

  121. Me too. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    At least one doctor in England has proposed that every male over 40 should be on a statin drug, aspirin, and a beta blocker, since all these are well-tolerated and in most cases beneficial.

    At least one doctor should be removed from practice.

    Emotions are yours to learn how to deal with. Stop drinking coffee. Stop working/living under unhealhty stress. Get out of bad relationships. Stop eating foods which are not good for you.

    I've gone through some difficult patches of stress and anxiety which I did not understand at the time. I found that paying attention to my health and my environment and my practices is what saw me through. I had to learn new techniques for living, all of which have given me a wider range of powers and abilities. Pills of this sort can derail the growth process.


    -FL

  122. Not a way suitable for everyone by Al_Maverick · · Score: 1

    Nice. But as you already know, Buddhism is not a road for everyone to take. Just one of the possible roads. I'm a Zen Buddhist, and though I'm very comfortable with it, I wouldn't recommend it to everyone. There is a road for every person and it might not be the same as ours. Just my 2 cents.

  123. Reminds me of a recent episode of Stargate..... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    A race was working with an alien technology that could remove/implant memories (including erase bad memories). This could be a massive breakthrough. If they can somehow force it to target memories (perhaps with some sort of therapy or mental "exercizes" done by the taker), it could probably be great for traumatic memories. I'd be hesitant though to take a drug that probably doesn't target memories too much, unless everything over the past few * I wanted to forget.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    1. Re:Reminds me of a recent episode of Stargate..... by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

      Duuude, you beat me to the punch. I too saw that episode last week, so when I read this story I put 2+2=5. I'm sure my wife could have used this pill a few weeks ago immediately after surgery with the pain and trauma.

  124. Kinda reminds me by John+Frink · · Score: 1

    This pill reminds me of this: http://imdb.com/title/tt0116768/
    great movie.

    --
    Who is this Jimmy character, and why was he cracking corn in the first place?
  125. This hasn't been used yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gosh, I thought that this pill was already being put into our water. The way people act, you'd think that having a lying president who spies on us and sends our citizens to die in a bogus war would be traumatic enough to trigger some repercussions! But every day I'm amazed by how much people just ignore this- as if what he has done isn't worse than watergate both in morality and legality.

  126. Re:We must consider the consequences of these drug by conureman · · Score: 1

    Good point, we have no idea what the long-term consequences of these mind control drugs will be. However, the money is probably there to be made, so we'll be able to enjoy the societal benefits anyway. Like Tylenol for the folks who weren't planning on using their Livers, and Prozac, Xanax &c. for the bystanders who forgot to wear their ballistic protection.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  127. Chill out, guys... by demonlapin · · Score: 1
    It's propranolol. A beta blocker. Prescribed to millions of people worldwide, for high blood pressure and after heart attacks. The proposal is that it might prevent PTSD symptoms from developing, not that people would blot out the whole event.

    It's actually quite common for people to take this drug before experiences that might make them nervous - public speaking, flying, whatever - because it blunts the fight-or-flight reflex.

    (Yes, I am a doctor. No, this is not medical advice. YMMV. Don't take it if you have asthma, it might precipitate an attack.)

    1. Re:Chill out, guys... by fdskjs · · Score: 1

      PTSD isnt fear of flights or public speaking what kind of doctor are you? go read wikipedia

    2. Re:Chill out, guys... by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      What's your point?

      Mine was that it is a common drug, frequently prescribed and taken, not a OMG ME KILL INNOCENT BABIES THEN LAUGH HAHAHAHA ME SLEEP HAPPY IF KILL MORE pill.

  128. Re:Expect trouble, both from victims and the viole by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    I may be wrong about this and am not going to google it from work given the search terms I'd be using, but I'm pretty sure the Nazis invented methamphetamines and gave them in large quantities to their soldiers -- not for overcoming scruples, but for overcoming exhaustion. I'm pretty sure I remember reading that the Goering was a complete meth-head by the end of the war.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  129. Aldous Huxley would be proud by MrNougat · · Score: 1

    Primary rule: keep the soma flowing.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  130. Re:Expect trouble, both from victims and the viole by 99luftballon · · Score: 1

    Both sides used amphetamines in WWII and most branches of the armed forces continue to use them today. The drug itself was invented in the late 1800's, although I thing the chemist was German.

  131. pot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they smoke a pot every few hours for a couple days, the same effect would be accomplished. It reduces the amount of memory retained for the duration of it's effects. It is cheap and readily available. Albeit illegal in foolish countries.

  132. propranolol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Typical newsie cluelessness.

    beta blockers are a very old class of drugs and propranolol is one of the oldest of the class. They have been on the market for more than 25 years and are very widely used for control of high blood pressure and other heart and circulation problems. Millions of people take beta blockers (I do myself).

    If this class of drugs had any magical properties with respect to trauma and memory, they would have been noticed long ago. What we are talking about here is some very minor effect that may not even exist, although one group of researchers think they have some evidence.

    Most "discoveries" like this turn out to be wrong. Sturgeon's Law applies here too.

    Nothing to see here, folks!

  133. Blessed are the forgetful, supposedly by danpsmith · · Score: 1
    but are they really? I think living through tramatic events is a do or die situation. I know that it was rough for many Vietnam veterans experiencing shell shock, but shouldn't that make us look harder at the treatment veterans receive or the way we treat people enrolled in our armed forces?

    Instead of actually fixing problems, it's always easy to reduce the effect of the symptoms. I know that rape victims may not want to deal with all the pain, but there is some reality in it. When your siblings or children or parents die, I believe you should feel that pain. That pain is what makes you who you are.

    Pills can't cure everything, and they aren't a way to address serious social ills. By saying pop a pill to make it better, you are in a way embracing the fact that we can never even come close to solving these problems.

    Imagine if the Megan's mother of the Megan law had only popped a pill. Without her pain, her feeling of the need to get something accomplished in her daughter's name probably wouldn't have occurred. The same goes for anything that victims of violent crime have done to help legislation.

    I know that for some people the pain of a traumatic event can lead to mental instability and possibly even suicide later in life, but to cover up these things with a pill is simply to cure a symptom. The disease still exists. I think people should be pushed towards dealing with traumatic events instead of repressing them. We already do enough of this without the pills.

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  134. This would be terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The possibilities for abuse of this drug are immense. To twist the OP just slightly:

    Post-traumatic stress: "Sergeant, I want you to take this pill, you don't need to remember that I just accidentally wiped out a village".

    Rape: Give the victim the date-rape drug -and- the forget-a-rape drug.

    Yeah, umm, bad as both above are, the cases of abuse are worse.

  135. Happy Pill by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Time for your Happy Pill, Citizen...

    Prise the Computer. The Computer is your friend.

  136. as a semi-professional... by nido · · Score: 1

    EVERYONE has had less than positive experiences in their life.

    What's important is the lesson that we learn from those experiences. Sometimes the lesson contributes to our own personal growth, and sometimes the lesson inhibits it.

    BUT - every less-than-positive experience has some positive learning associated with it.

    Maybe you have a fear of heights, that was installed when your mother pulled you away from the edge of the deck when you were 2 years old. Positive learning: Mom cared about her baby, and was concerned that you might injure yourself. Heights in and of themself aren't 'bad', but you as a 2 year old were unaware of the potential hazard, and Mom needed to protect you.

    This is basic Hypnosis / NLP Timeline work.

    I used to work with a lady who was always pissed off. I told her I knew some hypnotic techniques that were good for anger. Several months later she calls me up... "Remember how you offered to help? Well, I'm worse now, is the offer still open?"

    She had a good idea where her problems came from - self-described "military brat" who moved a lot growing up... Got pregnant when she was 14, divorced from the father of her 2 other kids, financially unstable, maybe some sexual abuse, etc. But having a good idea what created her problem didn't help. I guided her into a trance state and led her through some "timeline" work, taking her back to some of the less than positive experiences in her past.

    Everyone has had times that weren't so great, it's the lessons we take away that count. With the benefit of hindsight, even the worst of experiences have some positive lesson that can benefit you.

    So - I directed the co-worker to a less than positive experience in her past. Find the positive lesson, go back to the start of the event, re-live the event with that lesson in mind, and experience how everything changes from that point in your past all the way down through your personal timeline to the present...

    I'm just an amateur, so "D" is still kind of angry. But after going through 3 or 4 or 5 separate less-than-positive events (I didn't ask what they were, but I do know that she was surprised at what came up) the all-consuming rage is gone.

    It's stupid to expect a drug to fix every problem we might have, because it concentrates power in distant pharmaceutical companies, when local professionals (Hypnotists/NLP Practioners/etc) are better able to help us with our problems.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  137. dont get it wrong by fdskjs · · Score: 1

    PTSD is not when you have to regret something its the symptoms you develop after you have witnessed/exprienced an event that "shook the foundations of our beliefs about safety, and shatter our assumptions of trust." (rape and war do that well) i know that from exprience, i suffer from chronic PTSD myself.

  138. MIB by No2Gates · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a Neuralizer like in Men in Black, just in pill form.

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
  139. This Drug is already used by millions by sjames · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind when considering this drug, it is already used for high blood pressure by millions. (It's a beta blocker)

    Because of that we already have a lot of practical knowledge about it's safety and side effects, including it's effects on memory. Surely, people who take it regularly have already testified in court. Of course that doesn't mean defense lawyers won't try to claim it somehow taints a witnesses memory, some defense lawyers will say or do anything (perhaps to the point that court is more traumatic than the original incident)

    It doesn't somehow erase any memories, or even blunt the ability to recall them. What is DOES do is blunt the traumatic associations that cause their recall to re-create the physiological state you were in at the time. That is, it lets you recall the memory like any other rather than re-live it.

    Off lable use post-trauma is not even that new, though there has been little formal study, probably because the patents are all expired.

  140. dangerous possibilities... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1
    There are some dangerous possibilities here. For one, I'd imagine this would be the 2nd pill used for 'date-rape drugs'... the first to get someone into bed in compliant fashion, and this to 'erase' or haze their memory enough that there'd be little chance of later prosecution.

    Or there could be many uses where it might damage memories that would be used by a victim and the police to find or prosecute someone. (criminals might start carrying a gun and a bottle of pills)

    Seems like it'd be far more dangerous than helpful, in the bigger picture of probably abuses.

  141. MDMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MDMA

  142. Denial has evolved into a pill now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting.

  143. New street drug, wheee by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    It seems like every weird drug has its own market niche of addicts on the street, and a general image of the people using it. It should be interesting to see what the Eraser Heads are like compared to pot-heads, freaks on Angel Dust or ravers on ecstasy.

    See from a distance, of course.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  144. Take pill... comit a crime... pass lie detector... by gonx · · Score: 1

    Seems like this could be seriously abused in our legal system (not that you need this to abuse the legal system but...) Take the pill then commit a serious crime where no one but you has all the details because everyone else is dead. If you don't leave enough evidence and you 'honestly'don't remember anything it would be interesting to see what happened.

  145. Without R'ing the FA... by Panaphonix · · Score: 1

    They rediscovered ecstasy?

  146. How about "trauma cigarette" or "trauma brownie"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been around for years -- It is called marijuana, pot, chronic, ganja, spliff, weed, etc. and it doesn't take a billion dollar drug company to manufacture it either. Anyone who can grow tulips or a tomato plant can create this trauma drug.

    I smoke two joints in the morning
    I smoke two joint at night
    I smoke two joint in the afternoon
    It makes me feel all right

    I smoke two joints in time of peace
    And two in time of war
    I smoke two joints before I smoke two joints,
    And then I smoke two more

    Daddy he once told me,
    "Son, you be hard workin' man"
    And momma she once told me,
    "Son, you do the best you can"
    Then one day I meet a man,
    He came to me and said,
    "Hard work good and hard work fine,
    but first take care of head"

  147. Can be used by criminals on witnesses by mi · · Score: 1

    As well as by the "good guys" -- as shown in "Men in Black".

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  148. Concerned by Faynor · · Score: 1

    Isn't learning to deal with the things life throws at us part of what makes us who we are?

  149. Re:There's Evidence That Suggests Forgetting is Go by conureman · · Score: 1

    Can I quote your sig?

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  150. Keep your pills.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And I'll keep my PTSD. It is part of me, and even though I hated going through things, it makes me who I am today. To try and "HELP" me in that way infuriates me. More people in this world need to deal with things, taking a pill will not change the fact that the world is a dangerous place, and always has been.

    To repeat myself, "DEAL WITH IT".

  151. Not to erase the memories but the obsessions by planckscale · · Score: 1
    I experienced a guy pointing a revolver at my head and pulling the trigger twice. Thankfully it was not loaded, and I was able to beat the shit out of him. Still, in the ensuing months, my mind, seemingly on it's own, would replay the events over and over. I can still remember every little detail now, 5 years later, but it's at my own discretion.

    Perhaps these pills could help to stop the mind from obsessing and going over and over the events that caused the trauma. Yeah, it was good for me to resolve the feelings and thoughts on my own, but it was almost torture to have my mind so pre-occupied with the event. Concentrating on anything other than the event was near impossible. So if this pill could have brought the obsessive thoughts down to only a week as opposed to a month, all the better.

    I can only imagine that the time and pain produced by traumatic events that some people go through would be simply unbearable. A woman who accidently kills her own child; a man who witnesses a catastrophe; a teenager who looses an arm - good riddance to those intrusive memories.

    --
    Namaste
    1. Re:Not to erase the memories but the obsessions by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      I experienced a guy pointing a revolver at my head and pulling the trigger twice. Thankfully it was not loaded, and I was able to beat the shit out of him. Still, in the ensuing months, my mind, seemingly on it's own, would replay the events over and over. I can still remember every little detail now, 5 years later, but it's at my own discretion.

      I feel the same way about Bettis' fumble with 1:20 remaining this past Sunday. I have a feeling I will be seeing that ball popping out and imagining what would have happened had Big Ben not made that arm-tackle.

      It was traumatic enough for this man to cause a heart attack.

      Steeler fans need to get ahold of this pill before Sunday.

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    2. Re:Not to erase the memories but the obsessions by planckscale · · Score: 1
      Haha yeah I read about that incident. The guy was most concerned that play would be Bettis' last after a great career; and not that the Steelers would lose.

      BTW, take that terrible towel and wipe your eyes, because next year the Lions are coming after you!

      --
      Namaste
  152. Am I the only one who immediately thought.... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    ...of the Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind?

    1. Re:Am I the only one who immediately thought.... by fleaboy · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of a warped Groundhog Day but this is fitting as well.

      --
      Life is a gift. And my Karma couldn't possibly be 'Positive'
  153. Re:There's Evidence That Suggests Forgetting is Go by runderwo · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this would help treat victims of bad acid trips. Supposedly PTSD is the root cause of the psychological problems that can persist.

  154. I think the PTSD pill is MDMA by The+Philosophers+Cat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The active ingredient in Ecstasy tablets (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) has trauma reliving properties. The DEA has approved the use of the drug for medical studies. And American servicemen and women coming back from Iraq have been offered MDMA to help relieve post traumatic stress .

    I suspect the controversy over MDMA is potentially the main reason why most researchers would choose not to mention the active ingredient in their PTSD pill.

    1. Re:I think the PTSD pill is MDMA by Coyoteold1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suffered from PTSD. Everything I was ever told led me to believe that the best I could do would be learn to cope with it, but that there was no real "cure."

      I then learned that MDMA showed signs of being able to treat sufferers of PTSD, even years after the fact.

      So, even though it was not legal, I researched it, including what little I could find about dosages, got some, and I used it a couple times. While under the influence of it, I made myself examine and explore the memories of the traumatic events.

      I no longer exhibit any of the symptoms of PTSD. It did not require that I continue to take it for long periods. I don't think it was the chemical by itself, but I do believe that it made my recovery possible.

      It has removed a looming, painful spectre from my life.

      No more nightmares. No more frightening reactions to common stimuli. No more becoming overwhelmed in crowds. No more flashbacks. No more randomly having my body react as if innocent strangers were about to attack me.

      In Post Traumatic Stress, (and, iirc) phobias, neural paths are formed between the hippocampus (which handles long-term memory) and the Amygdala (which, among other things, governs fear or fight/flight responses). Those paths _bypass_ your normal, conscious thought processes. That, supposedly, is why even people who have undergone desensitization therapy for phobias, so that they can handle the object of their phobia without fear, can _still_ be prompted to a phobic reaction if they are suddenly startled by the object of their fear.

      _Supposedly_, the way I understand it, MDMA can help break down, or re-route those paths.

      What it _felt_ like, for me, was being able to re-examine the things that caused me the initial trauma, but without pain or fear. It let me look at the memories and incorporate them in a more healthy way.

      I didn't _lose_ the memory of the events. I didn't have any weird side effects. If anything, my cognitive function is better than it was beforehand, possibly because I'm not _twitchy_ all the time.

      When I heard that people in the military might be given MDMA to help them with shell-shock/PTSD, I was glad. When I heard that they might be refused that assistance (because some twit decided to make MDMA illegal, instead of just limiting it's use to medical purposes), I was very angry.

      My experience is anecdotal. But my take on it is, I used to have PTSD. It impacted my life _horrendously_. I couldn't go out in crowds. If someone touched me or even came near me when I was sleeping, I'd _attack_ them without even being fully conscious. I could end up sweating and flooded with adrenaline just because some stranger, at the edge of my vision, raised their hand over my head.

      And now that's all _gone_. No holes in my brain, no heart attacks, no cognitive difficulties, no destruction of my brain's ability to produce seratonin. I haven't turned into a druggie. I haven't lost the ability to feel pleasure. _None_ of the scary side-effects attributed to MDMA have happened to me (or anyone I've met who has tried it). Of course, I didn't pop handfuls of it for recreation, and do it over and over every week.

      I still remember everything that happened. It didn't take away my memories. But I'm not _harmed_ by them any more. I can look at them with understanding, as an adult human being. I can feel and understand what happened to me, without being torn up by it.

      I had another friend who had a traumatic childhood. If anyone raised their voice to this person - a perfectly rational, brave and intelligent person, it could cause them to have a _severe_ panic attack, leaving them shaking and crying, even if no _aggression_ was being directed at them. They've taken MDMA a handful of times (not at my direction!) and this seems to have been alleviated. Just recently, they had a big strong man cussing them out and yelling in their face, and they were upset - but remained calm, rational, and in control, without the adrenaline, panic, and shaking.

      I'm _very_

  155. emotional memories are the least reliable by geekotourist · · Score: 1
    Studies have already found that certain types of emotional memories- flashbulb memories- are unreliable:
    Perhaps you are thinking that "there are some memories that I have that I will never forget. I remember them as if they just happened. Sure, some of my memories may be become altered or even distorted, but surely these special memories are not subject to such changes." What you are thinking of are called flashblub memories, which are memories formed when some personally significant event occurs, and the whole scene is encoded into memory. Examples of flashbulb memories may include the first time someone asked you, or you asked someone, out on a date, the first time you heard that a special person died, when you first heard you won a prize or contest...

    Neisser and Harsch (1992) had subjects describe what was going on when they first heard about the Challenger shuttle explosion. Two and half years later, Neisser and Harsch found their subjects, and again asked them to describe what they had been doing when they first heard about the Challenger explosion. They compared the descriptions and scored them for similarity. The mean score was 2.95 out of 7. Three subjects of 44 got a perfect 7, and over half were less than 2.[emphasis added]

    Or, anecdotally, ask women who've been through childbirth how long they waited until their next child. I've heard "Soon after I forgot how $#@# painful the last one was" more than a few times. Thats what I remember.
    1. Re:emotional memories are the least reliable by timeOday · · Score: 1

      That certainly doesn't prove emotional memories are the least reliable. First, because they were asking about incidental circumstances instead of the traumatic event itself (along the lines of "what did you have for dinner the night you were raped?"). Second, to prove your argument, they'd have to compare this result with an experiment in which they ask subjects about randomly chosen points in time, i.e. "What were you doing on Sept. 9 1998 at 2:20pm?" which was presumably not an emotional time for most people. In other words, the fact that people remember the Challenger explosion at all proves how memorable emotional events are, compared to the rest.

  156. Some people are going to want to know... by rcamans · · Score: 1

    Are they effective enough to get people over the trauma of Bill and Hillary Clinton, or George W. Bush?
    We are talking serious trauma here, I know.
    Is this the pink pill, as opposed to the blue pill?

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  157. Martini for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and the usual roofie colada for your date?

  158. Drug pushers by catahoula10 · · Score: 1

    The goal of the Drug industry:
    To see evey human on earth chemically modified for profit.

    --
    This has been another valuable and informative opinion from:
    Catahoula!
  159. There already is a pill that helps PTSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually there are drugs that have been around for years that have helped psychiatrists treat PTSD and other emotional problems. Its called 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine or MDMA (and its analogues and derivatives), too bad its illegal.

  160. EMDR by HarryLeBlanc · · Score: 1

    There's already a highly effective treatment for PTSD -- it's called EMDR, short for eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. I'm always suspect of drugs as treatment for psychological problems. On the one hand, they work great for problems that appear to be primarily biochemical in nature (eg, bipolar, some forms of schizophrenia). But there's a tendency to throw drugs at problems that are primarily emotional or behavioral in nature (eg, the ballooning diagnosis of ADHD with the attending behavior-control drugs). Drugs should be a treatment of last resort; if there's an effective non-drug treatment, such as EMDR, that should be tried first.

  161. What? by QMO · · Score: 1

    "I think that in a society where everyone is enlightened past belief in God would be that moral."

    Did you mean for that sentence to read that way?
    It doesn't make sense to me.

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    1. Re:What? by Descalzo · · Score: 1
      I even used "Preview"

      I don't think a society where everyone is enlightened past belief in God would be that moral.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
  162. Sure would be easy to commit crimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think, you can do anything you want, give the victim this drug and they are terrible witnesses in court.

    Or you can make your solders commit horrible attrocities and then give them a pill and they can't testify against you in a court of law later.

    Seems like a really really bad idea to me.

  163. I have been on this drug!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having read what everyone else is saying, I feel I must add my $0.02.

    Y'all have this all wrong.

    I recognize that drug! I've been on Propranolol! It reduces stress. But it does *NOT* block memory formation.

    I've been on other drugs that do block memory formation... I went in for an upper GI biopsy once. The memory effects of that drug were very clearcut. One second the doctors were getting ready to put a coax-cable-on-steroids down my throat. The next was hours later with some nurse was telling me, for the umpteenth time, to stop doing wheelies in the wheelchair.

    Propranolol, in contrast, is about as harmful as aspirin.

    It was prescribed to me to treat test anxiety. (One of the many side effects of my horribly barbaric and tortured childhood.)

    You say "Test Anxiety", how bad can that be? Well, pretty bad. I could do the work. Easily. I was just far too stressed out to think clearly. Which was further exacerbated by the much-higher-than-normal stakes involved. And by my parents, who were concerned that I would surpass them and were doing a damn fine job of sandbagging me. Naturally, behavioral conditioning kicked in with positive feedback, making each test worse than the one before.

    Propranolol, in very low doses, blocked the stress. I was free to think, to work, unencumbered.

    Of course, that's how I was/am outside of testing. So those effects were not readily observable at the time. (It's remarkably hard to be objective about the subjective.)

    The effects of Propranolol were so difficult to discern that, at the time, I thought I might have been given a placebo.

    The worst side effect I ever saw was when I tripped. Normally, reflexes and adrenaline would kick in. I'd stumble, throw my hands out, and catch myself on the ground.

    Under Propranolol, one moment I'd be walking. The next I'd be lying on the ground going "what the hell..." I knew I had tripped. I knew the root I tripped on. But I had no time to react.

    Not exactly a survival trait for troops in combat.

    But outside of dangerous situations... This stuff is a godsend!

    x--Always Anonymous when I talk about my past...Google is not my friend--x

  164. Red of Blue? [nt] by Morosoph · · Score: 1

    -- No Text --

  165. Red _or_ Blue? [nt] by Morosoph · · Score: 1
    Preview!

    Ps. Matrix reference.

  166. I found a great source for "forgetting pills" by PGillingwater · · Score: 1

    I recently found a great source of pills that help you to forget, but I can't remember where I got them. :-(

    --
    Paul Gillingwater
    MBA, CISSP, CISM
  167. Re:There's Evidence That Suggests Forgetting is Go by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

    I don't see why not - I probably stole it from someone else. ;)

    --
    "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  168. Re: Summarize and take notes by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
    But if you are already summarizing in your head, you are half way there, you can just write the summarized information in some abbreviation format and skip filler words. If you have a good memory you also probably don't need to write down and can just remember by the time of the exam. Most people, like me for example, are not as good

    After a while you will develop your own short hand syntax. Not every word said by the professor is important. For example he or she might say: "Most often in plasma etching, radicals will be absorbed on the wafer and then form volatile products." Possible keywords are: {plasma etching, radicals, absorb, volatile products}. Now the whole thing could translated to something like "@ plasm etch. radicals absorbed on wafer => volatile prod.". If you have established for youself that @ means during, at, while, at the same time. And "=>" means causes, forces, results, produces.

    You forced yourself to extract the main idea and then wrote it down. You dictated to youself in your head what you had to write. Your hand traced the sybmols of the words. So you associated tactile, auditory and visual sensory information to the concept.

    Also, you don't have to write notes in a linear, text-only format -- use diagrams. If possible. A picture _is_ worth a thousand words. So in this case draw a very simple digram of a vacuum chamber. Then show radicals with an arrow going into the wafer and then volatile products coming out of the wafer. That will be much easier to recall than a paragraph of words.

  169. Re:There's Evidence That Suggests Forgetting is Go by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

    I can't comprehend how dwelling on horrific memories (e.g. how you felt when your buddy got burned alive while you watched, pinned down by a sniper) could help at all to get on with one's life. Yet that is the sort of things that psychiatrists encourage.

    Since you asked, that is a link to a website that does a fair job of learning about the process of Systematic Desensitization. In your sniper example, a person suffering from PTSD would feel anxious (and probably behave in a way that's not adaptive) in situations that reminded him of the traumatic event. So if he was walking through a park, and triggered some memory of the traumatic event (let's say the trees reminded him of the jungle where this all occurred, whether the memory was conscious or unconsciously recalled), he might suddenly get scared, angry, and nervous. Which is pretty understandable, given his experience. But if he lashes out at his partner, or the only way he can finish the walk in the park is to get drunk, then you've got problems.

    So you talk about your feelings of anxiety, anger, frustration, helplessness, etc. surrounding that experience, to normalize them, and to make them less "charged." And then if they're less powerful, then you can deal with situations in a better manner.

    --
    "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  170. Re: Summarize and take notes by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    The problem is very few people take notes. They try and take transcripts. Do you think the poor sucker who types court transcripts remembers a word of what went on?

    Real notes are extremely personal, usually indecipherable to other people, especially those who weren't in the class, and may be extremely short -- just a few words to trigger memory of important points (important to you).

  171. Re:There's Evidence That Suggests Forgetting is Go by putko · · Score: 1

    Yes -- I've read about that.

    I've also heard that video games, used in systematic desensitization can work wonders.

    Oddly, for some the triggers are different, but the response is the same. E.g. you heara beeper go off, and your pulse quickens and breathing changes. It would be funny to have a game to desensitize people who run critical systems.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  172. Soldier's experiences are very important by microbox · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be better if they remembered, suffered, and convinced people not to go to war in the future?

    It wasn't until soldiers became literate that war all of a sudden became a tragedy (around WWI era). I guess when the guys doing the actual killing actually write about their experiences, the glory of war falls a little flat.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  173. Re:Bah... useless - suggestions by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    now now, we can't have drugs that increase sexual activity! that could lead to immoral activities!

  174. Good for some situations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see good use for a pill like this in situations dealing with horrific crimes with survivors. I've never been rapped or witnessed someone close or even just someone murdered and I am sure very few people on here posting that say this pill is a bad idea have been threw that kind of situation. Who are we to say deal with it or shit happens, when a situation like that has never happened to us. I can't begin to imagine what is going inside minds of the victims after an event like that and I don't think it is right of us to then deny someone a chance that may let them live a normal life again. People behave differently in these kinds of situations and would impact who ever it is uniquely. From some of the statistics I have seen about 1/3 of reported rapes victims experience PTSD. Not everyone may have been in a situation life altering to them so don't think that this pill would be mandatory and as it said only works when the chemicals involved during traumatic experience occurs.

    Reading some of the other posts I see a few people on here have misconception that the women or men who have been rapped was partly at fault for their ordeal, like someone saying to not walk alone on 10th street at 3am. Though I'm not saying that, that doesn't happen but statistically "Nearly 6 out of 10 sexual assaults occur at the victim's home or the home of a friend, relative, or neighbors", there is also the story of a mother with her child who was raped in a parking lot putting groceries into her car in broad daylight and told that her child would die if she screamed... so don't try to point partial blame at a rape victim to deny them use for a solution to leading a normal life.

    Lastly this is graphic and very horrific but what if... A friend of yours comes home from work and finds her husband and children beaten, gagged, and bound. Before she has time to think about the situation she is in, she goes to untie them only thinking of their safety. As quick as it took her to get to her family she is suddenly grabbed from behind and thrown into a wall, hitting her head against it and falling into daze during which she is tied up. She is raped in front of her family only then to be forced into watching the criminal kill all of the people she cares for... Before the criminal is done he rapes her again and shoots her in the head... she survives... Imagine the emotions that would be involved... If the choice were up to allow her the use of the pill if she wanted to take it, what would you do?

  175. There's a better solution awaiting FDA approval by Adam+Wiggins · · Score: 1
  176. Re:New Scientist had good coverage of this last ye by Archon · · Score: 1

    My guess is that an evil shrink could induce anxiety disorder/phobias in otherwise normal people, just through the power of suggestion.

    s/shrink/girlfriend/

  177. Re: Summarize and take notes by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

    True on both counts. I guess I've just always found the questions themselves provided sufficient information to "jog my memory" during the test, and outside the test you have the entire textbook for reference. If the professor says something important that I know isn't in the textbook, I mentally associate it with the feeling of forgetting something on the test, which means that my "memory aid" is most useful exactly when it is most needed.

    However, my system may not work for just any student. My scholastic habits were far from usual, any that may have influenced my decision to avoid notes. For example, I almost never did any significant review prior to a test, or even an exam, because I wanted the test or exam to reflect what I had actually learned during the semester, and not what I could cram into my brain the night before. Thus, if I did take notes, I almost never looked at them afterward. Also, though I cared about my grades, I didn't make them my entire life like some of my classmates seemed to. Despite that, I didn't do all that badly overall, and I had A's in most of the classes I really cared about (CS/CE combination major, in case you were wondering). The one domain I would make an exception for was history, since there are so many facts, figures, dates, and names to remember when dealing with history that the external storage space became essential. In that case, the notes were more of a "cache memory" I used to adapt to the overload. I'm not sure how much it actually helped, though.

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  178. Misunderstood by so many... by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    You get happiness, just not now.

    Now = bad, after death = good (this sums up most religions, actually)


    Unfortunately you are right in this. Many religious people believe something good will come out of their religious actions in the future, that they come to heaven while others, sinners, will be cast in hell and suffering. That somehow, it is not allowed to feel good, own great stuff or have a nice time on earth, because if you're fine then you should feel guilty. Basically, it's a way to control people. In extremity in these times, fanatics believe they will come to heaven by suicide-bombing people they see as the enemy, heretics.

    However, you will not find one religion _based_ on unhappiness, sorrow, misery and guilt. The core of every religion is based on knowledge about life, about how to raise human consciousness, enrichen life, healing, make the impossible happen and all the great stuff and stories! This core, which is all positive, is what is called spirituality, and is in the original core and intent of every religion.

    Unfortunately, human mind has had a tendency to twart things for its own ends, thus making trouble both for itself and others. This is called ignorance, because it does lead to misery, even though it might seem like a material gain in the short-term. It is all based on misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the original scriptures and lectures.

    Happiness is easy. Nobody can make you happy. Nothing can make you happy. If it does, it is only for a short term, while the external event or item is present. This type of happiness, just like a drug, will make you desire more and more things and attach more and more things on your happiness. So when they leave you, so will your happiness. It is a short-lived happiness not worth anything, because when they leave you, sorrow comes. It also makes you unattractive: Who thinks a nagging 5-year old child wanting MORE presents under a heavy loaded tree is something to admire? This is the current state of affairs in the West, compared to 99% of the rest of the world..

    Not being attached to happiness and sorrow, will also make you non-attached to things and external events. If something happen to come your way, you graciously accept or reject it, unattached. It doesn't mean you reject everything, because it may disturb your peace, or you should be so very pious and ascetic. That may become an attachment in itself!

    This is a tiny bit of what Buddhism and other paths are about I believe. Happiness sprouting from ones self naturally, without clinging to that happiness, and using the correct knowledge to eradicate sorrow, which is just an after-effect of happiness with attachment.

    Blablabla. Hope I make myself understood: That there is much more to this than meets the eye just after a few lines of reading.. That the core of at least Buddhism and other paths based on the ancient Vedas, are indeed rational and logical, when you start to sincerely study them.

  179. Re: Summarize and take notes by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Me too. Any time I've ever been forced to take notes I never, ever looked at them again. I once had this teacher who liked to give us pre- and post- tests. You'd write a test at the beginning of a unit to see how much you knew, then wrote a test at the end and compared to see how much you learned. The only time I ever studied (my mother made me) I had gotten 100% on the pre-test and only 95% on the post. ;)

    Like I tell people, I prefer to learn things while they're being taught, or better yet, before, rather than just before an exam. I got 100% on the essay portion and 99% (I suspect the answer was wrong) on the multiple choice part of my grade 12 (last year of high school) provincial Social Studies (history and geography combined) exam. Fortunately I was never required to memorize a date for Social or History. Enlightened teachers I guess. My university History teacher used to send me to the library to write exams.

  180. Coulda use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could have used this back in 2002 when I realized 9/11 was an inside job. What a shock that was. Since I'm expecting lots more weather warfare, how do I get a prescription?

  181. Re:How about "trauma cigarette" or "trauma brownie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I do.

  182. Re:New Scientist had good coverage of this last ye by Forbman · · Score: 1

    The philosophical argument is interesting too. Memories are a fundamentally defining attribute of the human experience. What happens to us as human beings when we choose to modify that?

    But we already try to. Gotten drunk after you got dumped by a SO, fired from a job, realized your wife has been cheating on you for the last 10 years, etc?

    Gotten stoned at the end of the day to blow off a little steam?

    So your point is kind of moot.

  183. Re:Expect trouble, both from victims and the viole by Forbman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem is, the SS didn't need these pills to do what they did. Did the citizens of Dachau do much of anything resembling numbing grief once the purpose of the "factory" in the town was revealed to them?

    I think the main motivation for the gas chambers was just sheer numbers required. The Germans didn't dig the graves, the condemed did. The Germans didn't cart out the dead, the prisoners did. With the gas chambers and mausoleums (I won't call them ovens), they could be renditioned quickly without having to stop for the crude step of putting bullets in them first.

    There was an NPR interview with an Iraqi man who professed to have been a torturer for Saddam Hussein. How could someone bring themselves to doing this shit, basically? The man said it's a process, an indoctrination. Unless you're already a sociopath, you have to be made into a torturer. One of the most powerful tools used was the torturing and execution of fellow indoctrinates, often times at the hand of the indoctrinates. When someone says, "torture him or you will suffer the same fate", well... human nature dictates that 999999/1000000 will do the dirty deed.

    So, if you have a society that so buys into the koolaid that the Jews are responsible for all the bad that has happened to them, and it makes sense, then bad shit starts to happen. How did the Tutsis and Hutus blow up into their stark ravin' mad slashfest? It didn't just happen over nite. How does all the Hindu-v-Muslim shit in India happen? It's been developing there for over 500 years. If you grow up in an environment of bullshit, it seems like the truth. So tieing up your neighbor in barbed wire and throwing a car tire full of gasoline around his neck, and lighting it up on fire, starts to sound like a reasonable way to resolve differences in your favor.

  184. Enlightenment by mfh · · Score: 1

    Yeah, many folks wouldn't get the cosmic joke, but you seem to have a pretty good handle on it yourself. I've been enlightened and overburdened, on and off now for the past decade. Enlightenment is not at all something you can hold onto though -- and I think that's the whole point. We challenge ourselves to learn more about what we aren't, thinking it will somehow have an impact on anything tangible. We're aching to please! It's like suggesting the politics of societies within the tiny grain of sand stuck to the roof of your mouth will have any bearing on anything whatsoever -- it's impossible. But we're no different from that society. We have rules, too. We have pain, too.

    So then, we wonder; what's possible?

    Heart!

    Only heart is possible, anywhere. Everything else is just meaningless, on each plane.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  185. Who could dispense trauma pills? by FishinDave · · Score: 1

    Divorce lawyers, definitely. Tattoo artists. Little League, PeeWee Football, and Youth Hockey coaches (for the parents).

  186. I guess the last thing you'd like is advice, but.. by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry for your wife. I don't know if it will cure her, but it will definately help. Art of Living courses have been successfully given to terrorists, quake victims, flood-victims and many other types of victims. Trauma-relief is a very big priority for International Association for Human Values and Art of Living Foundation. Especially since traditional medicine is not really all that successful about it.

    Instead of just me talking about it, you can read more about it, and here also.

    I recommend it fully. With an open mind and a genuine wish for healing and relief, I can almost guarantee that there will be much of that. A center should be close by, since it is a world-wide organisation.

    There are people in this world that care, and there are ways to relieve any stress and trauma. I'm a volunteer for this organisation, and have seen much that have risen my faith in humanity despite everything else we see in the media.

    I recommend you try it. You might just find out like me that there still are wonders in this world. Good luck, and best wishes to you and your wife!