Slashdot Mirror


How Hot Would a Light Saber Really Be?

Datagod asks: "Has anyone ever calculated the temperature you would need to be able to slice through steel like it was thin air? How hot would a light saber really need to be? Also, I am assuming that at least some of the metal would be vaporized and the expanding gas would fling bits of molten metal at the saber wielder. Wouldn't your average Jedi be horribly scarred from all this."

410 comments

  1. 2nd post by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 5, Funny

    april fools! it's first.

    --
    -gjr
    1. Re:2nd post by cekerr · · Score: 5, Informative

      When I clicked on the link:
      "The House Subcommittee on Modern Intergalactic Weapons Development and Regulation"
      My Firefox browser was hijacked, endless screens opened up and somebody's voice came over the speaker saying I know not what. One of the screens was an unpleasant image.
      OK, I've been April Fooled. But I doubt it was the sort of thing slash.dot approves of and if it does, I'm disapointed.
      Yes, I know all sorts of clever people can hijack my computer via malicious links. But I had hoped for better standards around here.
      I'm now on the 4 hour virus scan/spyware checking cycle on my laptop. Just as well it's Saturday.

    2. Re:2nd post by buswolley · · Score: 1, Funny

      Suddenly, my wife approved of Slashdot!

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    3. Re:2nd post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got linux? virus scan wha?

    4. Re:2nd post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DON'T CLICK ON PARENT'S LINK! Really messes up your Firefox and screams gay pr0n.

    5. Re:2nd post by bigjohna · · Score: 1

      What the hell??? That was totally disgusting. I expect better of slashdot. : (

      --
      Big John---"Little Lucy's in the lab dead upon the floor, for what she thought was H2O was H2SO4."
    6. Re:2nd post by RobbieGee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wife?!?! AHaha! Good one, you almost had me!

      --
      If you get this, we're 10 of a kind.
    7. Re:2nd post by boingo82 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Huh? Are there people here who actually RTFA?

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    8. Re:2nd post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Note the link: http://www.house.gov/htbin/leave_site?ln_url=http: //hagaren.be/&ln_desc=http://slashdot.org/ In essence, you are not going to see what you think you are going to see.

    9. Re:2nd post by dickens · · Score: 1

      What FA?

    10. Re:2nd post by buswolley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      and a son.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    11. Re:2nd post by Technician · · Score: 1

      Browse /. with a live CD distro. The links and nasties don't have a chance to write anything anyplace. A reboot takes care of any drive by attack.

      I use ebuntu. It even finds the wireless NIC and sound in my laptop just fine.

      The hard drive is reserved for the other OS that won't run off a live CD and the banking and other tied in things that keep me from dumping the other OS.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    12. Re:2nd post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      TFA.

    13. Re:2nd post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that supposed to be funny or something? Boot an entirely different operating system just to use the web browser?

      You do realize that it's possible to lock down XP enough that what you're doing is entirely unnecessary, right?

  2. Very hot. by blues_shuffle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Very hot.

    1. Re:Very hot. by dnoyeb · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Somewhat hot.

    2. Re:Very hot. by kryten_nl · · Score: 5, Informative

      Very, very cold.

      As the anti-protons move at uniform speed and the temperature is defined by the relative speed of particles wrt the flow.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    3. Re:Very hot. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny
      Luke warm

      Luke warm maybe, but Leia in slave-dress is hot.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:Very hot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luke warm maybe, but Leia in slave-dress is hot.

      Indeed.

    5. Re:Very hot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      About as hot as me on a Saturday night when I've got my disco suit on and I'm all ready for a hot time with the chicks on the dance floor with the Bee Gees in the background as I show her my John Travolta moves and take her back to make out on my watebed with soft light from the lava lamp afterwards.

    6. Re:Very hot. by RazorX90 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A friend of mine is plagued by the following question:

      What happens when light sabers try to cut adamantium?

      I'll spare the details / speculation and leave it open ended...

      ...This of course makes me wonder what a fight between Wolverine and a Jedi would be like.

    7. Re:Very hot. by wipis · · Score: 1

      yeah but adamantium is extreamly hard. I didnt think it was etreamly tough to hot or cold. Dont be like no it cant be melted with enough energy anything can melt freeze burn whatever.

      But assuming the sword wouldnt just tear right through the metal the fight would be amazing. Still think a jedi would win. Force powers trump almost anything.

    8. Re:Very hot. by flogic42 · · Score: 0

      Leia is still not hot enough to melt steel blast doors, sadly. Her mother, on the other hand...

      --
      Check out my women's designer clothing store.
    9. Re:Very hot. by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Undecided

    10. Re:Very hot. by MartinB · · Score: 1
      What happens when light sabers try to cut adamantium?

      Dunno, but I expect you'd have to Stand and Deliver to the Kings of the Wild Frontier...

      ...I'll get me coat.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

    11. Re:Very hot. by Vlad2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cowyboy Neal

    12. Re:Very hot. by BakaHoushi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about adamatium, but I do know in the SW Universe there exist metals that can withstand a Jedi's lightsaber. Cortosis, I believe it's called. Most metallic weapons in Knights of the Old Republic used them so you couldn't just mow down enemies, and Jedi Knight II had villains who made armor out of it. I don't know how, exactly, it resists a lightsaber, but it seems pretty good at it.

    13. Re:Very hot. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > Leia is still not hot enough to melt steel blast doors,
      > sadly. Her mother, on the other hand...

      Debbie Reynolds?!?!? You sick mofo!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:Very hot. by Morky · · Score: 1

      Think laconic. Just "Luke warm." would have scored +5 funny.

    15. Re:Very hot. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Leia is still not hot enough to melt steel blast doors, sadly. Her mother, on the other hand...

      ... is also not hot. She's naked and petrified. But the grits with which she is covered are hot.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    16. Re:Very hot. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I'd hit it, and then spend the rest of my life singin' soprano!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    17. Re:Very hot. by Pusene · · Score: 1

      Please everyone: Vote for two new categories of moderation: outdated and disgusting

      --
      Error #13: No coffee. Operator halted. Please place boot device at bottom.
  3. teh h0t by grendel03 · · Score: 1

    I think the heat from a light saber is like, local.

  4. here's hoping by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    Hey maybe even I can get an article posted today! My article submissions obviously aren't prime-time material but from what I'm seeing on this special day .... off to do some submissions.

  5. Duh by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A real Jedi would jusst use the force to repel any bits away from him!

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Duh by coso · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mace Wendu: I don't want no muthafrakking metal bita coming at my muthafrakking eyes! I will not be some blind-ass
      Stevie Wonder jedi. ...and this the JEDI adopted OSHA standards.

      It is a time of great eye protection in the republic.

      Eyeprotection worn by leading scientists without the force powers to deflect metal bits from their eyes.

      They found the lightsaber:
      Was developed from an ancient bread-slicer / toaster.
      Contains 1.21 gigawats of power between recharge of it's flux capacitors.
      Ranges from 350F to 50000F (battery life may suffer from extended operation, and overheating may occur at high temperatures.
      Still makes a tasty grilled cheese sandwich in a pinch.
      It was a dark time in the Republic.
      Mainly because light sabers are really, really bright at high temperatures.
      So bright as to be blinding.
      Hence the recall. ........
      *sigh* and so the 100th episode of the Star Wars series aired... in gravity distorting 3-D.
      1138 left to go.

    2. Re:Duh by emilv · · Score: 1

      But then he would have to repell many megabits/s :|

    3. Re:Duh by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Hah ... nice THX reference there. That number appears in the old Duke Nukem 3D game on a screen in a hidden room. Sort of an homage to George Lucas, or something like that.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  6. spoiler warning!! by oedneil · · Score: 1, Funny

    Isn't this why Vader wore that mask? Sorry, I missed episode 3 so I'm not sure.

    1. Re:spoiler warning!! by nartz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Vader, that fawking guy, only wore the mask to hide his identity as an anarchist, wanting to overthrow the king...err...queen...

    2. Re:spoiler warning!! by ashridah · · Score: 1

      I thought he wore the mask because deep down, he wanted to be a black guy?
      Maybe I've just watched chasing amy too many times

      ash

  7. Not just heat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Power.

  8. Wickedlasers by cyber_rigger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Buy one and point it at a thermometer.

    http://wickedlasers.com/

    O.K. so these aren't really lightsabers.

    1. Re:Wickedlasers by kaan · · Score: 4, Informative

      omg for a second there i thought you posted a url to http://wickedweasel.com.

      *phew* that was close!

    2. Re:Wickedlasers by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Shit, are those things legal?

      In their description: You've tried every method imaginable to see that red laser beam. [...]Wicked Lasers grants you the ability to shoot a red laser beam, green laser beam, or even blue laser beam from your laser pointer. [...]Wavelengths or colors of laser beams vary in visual brightness even when the actual output power is the same.

      Yeah, it could be because of that. Or it could be because they're using Lasers 200 friggin times as powerful as stamdard pointers.

    3. Re:Wickedlasers by soren42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, god - what kind of an idiot are you?

      How could you unleash the terror that is these lasers into the hands of the Slashdot community??? There's a laser on that site that is visible 120 miles away, without assistance... Dangerous in the hands of the average reader!

      And I'm sure there's some wacko on here with the $2000 of disposable income that'll run out an buy to aim at planes... (as is *EXPLICTLY* prohibited on the website - and in US law.)

      --

      "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
    4. Re:Wickedlasers by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      Yeah like a link to wickedweasel.....com...would ...be....so bad....um..I gotta go to the bathroom.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    5. Re:Wickedlasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O.K. so these aren't really lightsabers.

      No, but with a 5-second exposure you can make them look like one. :)

    6. Re:Wickedlasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any geek knows, the proper expression is:

      "...I'll be in my bunk."

    7. Re:Wickedlasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see http://www.alsbikinis.com/ .

    8. Re:Wickedlasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first one is better, sorry. They look fake in the second.

    9. Re:Wickedlasers by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, just paddle three miles away from the coast and start lasering. Arrrrrrr!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    10. Re:Wickedlasers by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 1

      My 80mw laser made my thermometer jump from 70F to 163F in about 2 seconds before displaying LLLF. I don't know what temperature LLL really represents, but I bet it's hot.

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    11. Re:Wickedlasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200 miles from the coast, aherm.

      At least, if my public schooling has taught me anything.

  9. Your question ties into another question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could god create a burrito so hot, that he himself could not eat it?

    1. Re:Your question ties into another question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Emacs can create a core dump that it cannot edit.

      Heard that somewhere in response to a statement like this. I thought it deserved repeating :)

  10. It'd be cold, actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freezing cold, actually. It'd make your bladder freeze. That means... PISS FROST!

  11. Nanotechnology by Travoltus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A nanotech style light saber would be the best way to go. Nanites could burn through their target and work on a whitelist principle: a friend's DNA would be ignored.

    Quite literally you could ram your nanotech light saber through a hostage taker and the nanites would decline to harm the whitelisted hostage.

    I can't believe no one else thought of this. PATENT!!!!!! OMFG I am teh pwnz0r take that George Lucas!!!!!!

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Nanotechnology by Asmor · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm totally stealing that for D20 Future if I ever run a game.

      If your lawyers ask, my address, here's my email address:

      Theresa Bombinthisletter (the name's Ukranian, I get asked all the time)
      1600 Pennsylvania Ave
      Washington, DC 20500

    2. Re:Nanotechnology by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a dart with nanos suspended in a neutral fluid would work better. that way you can do it from a distance.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Nanotechnology by GeoffP · · Score: 1

      Odd, that looks like a mailing address, not an e-mail address. Are you using Hotmail?

    4. Re:Nanotechnology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theresa? The pink is working!

    5. Re:Nanotechnology by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      actually they did. that dragon tooth sword from deus ex was nanotech

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    6. Re:Nanotechnology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrongo, in Episode 13 it is revealed that the midichlorians are actually the nanites in the light saber.... George Lucas wrote it in his notebook 35 years ago.

        IN THE FACE... OF YUO

    7. Re:Nanotechnology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh wow, someone else actually played Deus Ex. Actually I always wondered how that thing worked... I thought them nannites were whetting the blade all the time? Oh, and does anyone know where the damn nanotech assets actually are that were lost during the tunnel collapse? I searched all over the canal, but nothing at the bottom

    8. Re:Nanotechnology by LuminaireX · · Score: 1

      How does one dual with another lightsaber bearer then? Using nanites as you describe, the sabers would cut through each other.

    9. Re:Nanotechnology by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      hey, it is my second favourite game

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    10. Re:Nanotechnology by doxology · · Score: 1

      You have to access it from the freezer room at Old China Hand. There's a vent somewhere or something...

      --
      sigfault. core dumped.
    11. Re:Nanotechnology by Tyrion+Moath · · Score: 1

      I think you might have had to go through the upper part of the freezer in that one guy's bar... Maybe? it's been a while since I played that game.

    12. Re:Nanotechnology by fbjon · · Score: 1

      What's the first one?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    13. Re:Nanotechnology by fbjon · · Score: 1
      Yep, the bar close to the water level, in the back freezer, on top of the stacked boxes and through those tunnels. But you need some kind of swimming aid, I usually have a trained level, and pick up the rebreathers in the box when you drop in the water. There's a dead scientist lying about in one end of the big tunnels who has it. IIRC you can get a nano canister with the same upgrades at another place too, so you don't have to get it there.

      Yes, I've played Deus Ex far too many times already, and now I got inspired to play it yet another time with a different tactic, dammit. It's too good for my own good!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    14. Re:Nanotechnology by Asmor · · Score: 1

      It was late and I was tired. :p

    15. Re:Nanotechnology by cgenman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Be careful! The nanites might only attack foes, but even inert they would still be enough to (for example) knock a friend off of a sail barge.

      My personal theory about light sabers is that they're really just extendable swords, with lights added to let people know where the bad parts are. You know, like how smell gets added to gasoline, or the title "prequal" gets added to some of Lucas's movies.

    16. Re:Nanotechnology by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      hand of fate (kyrandia 2)

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    17. Re:Nanotechnology by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      Twilight Zone future medical doctor bag. Already been done... NO PATENT FOR YOU!!!

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    18. Re:Nanotechnology by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      How does one dual with another lightsaber bearer then? Using nanites as you describe, the sabers would cut through each other.

      Na, the nanites sense danger in letting the other saber get to (and cut) their master, so the two nanite blades block each other....

      Of course, why all the nanites don't just swarm the other guy is beyond me... Maybe they get their power from that bright beam and can't operate outside of it's cone of effect. (Of course, that should mean the light-sabers blades look more like a yagi antenna's emmission pattern, but I digress)

    19. Re:Nanotechnology by jeffy210 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I just finished playing that game again right before I pulled up this article. 6 years later and it's still a great game (scary with the parallels though).

      --
      ------
      "And may your days be long upon the earth."
    20. Re:Nanotechnology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks

      I think I still have the savefiles, perhaps I should crank it up and see how it looks on my new computer!

    21. Re:Nanotechnology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently discovered that you can take out the cameras and turrets with a sniper rifle... Damn I was pissed I did not figure that out the first time I played it!!!

  12. Light sabers are not hot by tuxlove · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Light sabers work at the subatomic level, disintegrating matter. However, heat is generated within resistant materials, giving the impression that the sabers themselves are actually hot. Don't the slashdot guys know this?

    1. Re:Light sabers are not hot by neoform · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, it's just a sci-fi movie right? These things don't exists, so why are you explaining how they actually work?

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    2. Re:Light sabers are not hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because the story is asking how hot they would have to be.

    3. Re:Light sabers are not hot by jakethejuggalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      agreed. one of the tests to see if you built a lightsaber properly is to hold the blade near your hand and see if it emits heat. if it does not, you've built it properly. (i believe that was in one of the jedi academy books)

    4. Re:Light sabers are not hot by dslauson · · Score: 1

      Seriously, though, if you could give Jordy his sight back or give Data a soul, which would you do? Hooray for Friday night on Slashdot!!!!

    5. Re:Light sabers are not hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    6. Re:Light sabers are not hot by droopycom · · Score: 1

      You know this is Slashdot right ? These people are geeks, so why do you expect them to be grounded to reality ?

    7. Re:Light sabers are not hot by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      "Don't the slashdot guys know this?"

      Not the Slashdot guys who go "OMG!!! PONIES!!!"

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    8. Re:Light sabers are not hot by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

      Another FYI, disintergrating matter doesn't make it go away it refers to it breaking the strong bond which releases a huge amount of energy, atomic bombs anyone? Driving a broomstick sized matter ripper through a foot of steel would easily release enough energy to kill everything in the room, probably everything within a 1000'. Physics 101, energy can't be created or destroyed. You destroy matter you release energy and it's got to go somewhere. It'll express itself as heat, radiation and expanding gases any of which can kill you. Star Wars isn't normally considered Science Fiction but is closer to fantasy so normal physics need not apply.

    9. Re:Light sabers are not hot by chaoticgeek · · Score: 0

      one would assume that they are hot because in Episode 1 they jam it into the steel door and it glows red and has the melted look where the had put the lightsaber.

      --
      hello
    10. Re:Light sabers are not hot by zqad · · Score: 1

      Well, they got to be hot at some extent. If you look at when Luke got his had cut off whitin the scene that darth vader (SPOILER!) told him that he is his father, you can se that blood doesnt come flooding. It rather looks as if the wound was shut with the help of heat. This was used in the earlier days to stop bloodflow on that type of open wounds.

    11. Re:Light sabers are not hot by maximthemagnificent · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of one of my mother's friends, who asked me in all seriousness why a child gate couldn't be made from force fields "you know, like on Star Trek". Ugh.

      Maxim

      The opinions are mine, but my company's pockets are deeper.

    12. Re:Light sabers are not hot by loki1978 · · Score: 0

      You must be new here, it seems

      --
      According to prophecy
    13. Re:Light sabers are not hot by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Geordi had better eyesight than humans. Data had a soul towards the end of the series; it was a tiny chip they found and started using full-time in the movies.

      What? You think your soul just floats there with no spiritual mechanical-physics behind it?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:Light sabers are not hot by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      That's true. Cauterization of the wound has been a feature of Lightsabers(TM) since before Han shot first.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    15. Re:Light sabers are not hot by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Additionally, if you manage to chop your own hand off, you've failed a test, but a different one.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    16. Re:Light sabers are not hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither, at one time, did Star trek Phasers or Communicators...

    17. Re:Light sabers are not hot by rossdee · · Score: 1

      The Sci part of SciFi means science. Good science fiction has some basis in science. If you have to say "its magic, you don't have to know how it works" then its Fantasy not SciFi.

      (However Lucas himself has refered to Star Wars being fantasy)

    18. Re:Light sabers are not hot by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Data does have a soul, you insensitive clod!

    19. Re:Light sabers are not hot by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. A light saber is just a limited directional force field modulated with a visible light frequency (helps to be able to see what you're slicing.) The field is only a few molecules thick, and simply slices right through most forms of matter. That's why light sabers work fine underwater.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    20. Re:Light sabers are not hot by neoform · · Score: 1

      Umm, so when i went to see Aeon Flux and Ultraviolet, I'm to understand that.. these movies were based on science?

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    21. Re:Light sabers are not hot by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Another FYI, disintergrating matter doesn't make it go away it refers to it breaking the strong bond which releases a huge amount of energy, atomic bombs anyone? Driving a broomstick sized matter ripper through a foot of steel would easily release enough energy to kill everything in the room, probably everything within a 1000'.

      Actually it doesn't release any energy. Steel is made primarily from iron, which is the stablest element (has the greatest binding energy per proton/neutron). Ripping apart iron atomic nucleus, or forcing them to fuse and form heavier elements, will take more energy than it gives. Much more.

      Steel also contains carbon atoms, and those could be fused for energy; however, if the process would also force iron to fuse, that would absorb all the energy released from carbon and propably more too. And you were talking about disintegration - fission - which would take energy, even for carbon nucleus.

      So sorry, but your broomstick nuke won't work. Now, if you were to drive that broomstick through uranium or plutonium...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    22. Re:Light sabers are not hot by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 1
      You missed part of his point...


      Good science fiction has some basis in science.

      --
      Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
    23. Re:Light sabers are not hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to know how they glow so brightly without casting light on their surroundings.

      Note in all of the duals in EpIII, despite all flashes and swings, the lighting on the actors does not change one bit.

      This seems to be some strange non-reflecting light, whatever will they think of next?

    24. Re:Light sabers are not hot by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      You could use that to refill the weapon's energy cells... After all, breaking the strong bonds takes a shitload of energy and there's a limit to what can feasibly fit into such a small device.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    25. Re:Light sabers are not hot by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Duh. I'd bring back Tasha Yar from the dead! And have sex with her!

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    26. Re:Light sabers are not hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I don't think most Slashdot users qualify as "fully functional."

    27. Re:Light sabers are not hot by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Duh. I'd bring back Tasha Yar from the dead! And have sex with her!

      And then kill her in Las Vegas so she could do a crime investigation crossover, right?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  13. Hot enough to bring down WTC7 by revscat · · Score: 1
    It wasn't structural weakness that brought it down, it was a Sith Lord.

    In your heart, you know it's true.

  14. As hot as... by killerface · · Score: 5, Funny

    not as hot as the pink on the site

    1. Re:As hot as... by Romancer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Seriousy, mod this up.

      I'm not kidding.

      That was funny shit.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    2. Re:As hot as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn, I don't get this... What is he talking about, and why is it funny? If it's about that double-tail-headed girl from ep3 with the pink saber, she was not funny, she was a freak, a weak freak that died when shot in the back by the clones. How is that funny?

    3. Re:As hot as... by killerface · · Score: 1

      Schadenfreude

    4. Re:As hot as... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      The pink has made me long for the IT brown.

    5. Re:As hot as... by hao2lian · · Score: 1

      I like how Slashdot went from "Oh gosh, girls and ponies and kitties!" to "Dude, wouldn't a light saber be cool? No wait, is that possible? Let's discuss the physics of it in the next 20 posts."

      --
      Pelé!
  15. Use the Force... by aktzin · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Wouldn't your average Jedi be horribly scarred from all this."

    Not necessarily, Padawan. If a Jedi cuts through a door/bulkhead/vehicle with a light saber s/he could avoid getting splashed with melted metal by applying a subtle Force push along with the slicing motion of the saber. To Saber 101 class you should return, youngling. ;)

    --
    Quantum mechanics: the dreams that stuff is made of.
    1. Re:Use the Force... by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

      There are nearly 400,000 Jedi Knights in the United Kingdom http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/c ommentaries/ethnicity.asp... So if you know enough people from the UK, chances are, you may already know a Jedi Knight who knows the answer.

      --
      No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
    2. Re:Use the Force... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      Well yeah. Look at the more mundane task of cutting metal with your bog-standard gas axe. If you're using oxy-acetylene you have a flame at around 3500C (slashdot won't let me put the degree symbol in - why not?), with an extra oxygen nozzle. This extra oxygen is controlled by a lever on the torch, and blows the molten metal away from you. Laser cutting does the same, but with compressed air (or occasionally nitrogen).


      Presumably it would be a trivial matter to generate a certain amount of Jedi force centred around the cutting point to push the metal away.

    3. Re:Use the Force... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Meh, Jedi 'followers' at best. They should know, particularly in the UK, that you don't become a "Knight" simply by claiming the title. ;)

  16. The real question is really... by TeacherOfHeroes · · Score: 4, Funny

    More importantly, could a Jedi make a light sabre so hot that he himself could not wield it?

    1. Re:The real question is really... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Sure. No one said Jedis were omnipotent.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:The real question is really... by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      BLASPHEMY !!!!111!!!~!11

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    3. Re:The real question is really... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1
      More importantly, could a Jedi make a light sabre so hot that he himself could not wield it?


      Kind of. Although, once that point is reached, they're technically no longer called lightsabres. I think you must be referring to a dildo ;)
    4. Re:The real question is really... by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Sure. No one said Jedis were omnipotent


      I'm going off topic, but I think today's as good a day as any to do so... is it possible that at some point God renounced his omnipotence? As an omnipotent being, he would certainly have the power to do so... but of course he might not be able to undo it afterward, being no longer omnipotent. Perhaps he painted himself into a corner that way.


      It would certainly explain the steep decline in the quality of miracles these days...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:The real question is really... by noblethrasher · · Score: 1

      I think that God constructed the universe in such a way that the future is unknowable. So the set of all things that are knowable are known to Him but the future is one of those things that can't be known. Hence the universe, such as it is, allows for an omniscient/omnipotent God and human freewill. I'll explain such things as prophecies by saying that God does have knowledge of all possible futures (probably an uncountable set). Also, assuming He is all powerful, He can pretty much say guarantee something is going to happen if he says/wants it to happen.

    6. Re:The real question is really... by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also going off-topic, God can't renounce his omnipotence. It is part of his nature. That is, even for God there are limits and omnipotence is one of those things that just "is". So in a way, he's not completely omnipotent. Right now it's really late and it's been a while since freshman philosophy class so that's the best I can come up with.

    7. Re:The real question is really... by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'm going off topic, but I think today's as good a day as any to do so... is it possible that at some point God renounced his omnipotence?



      Yeah. Nowaday, God logs in as a user instead of as root. It's so much more secure.

    8. Re:The real question is really... by regular_gonzalez · · Score: 0

      I think thats kinda what the Beyonder was going for at the end of Secret Wars II.

      --
      Due to circumstances beyond my control, I am master of my fate and captain of my soul.
    9. Re:The real question is really... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      If you paint yourself into a corner...walk on the painted floor...It can be fixed.

    10. Re:The real question is really... by sigzero · · Score: 0

      No, God is completely omnipotent. You have to combine that with His other attributes as well though (omniscience and omnipresence). When we start talking about the omnis we come up with stupid things like "can God make a rock so heavy even he can't lift it?".

    11. Re:The real question is really... by rgoldste · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Scott Adams wrote a book, God's Debris, that explores your question of what happens if God gives up his omnipotence. I'll let you read the free ebook yourself, but the basic idea is that God, as a perfect being, gets bored of his own existance and tries to spice things up by committing suicide. In doing so, God created the universe.

      Wikipedia notes the parallels of this to Hinduism. When I read God's Debris, I was reminded of GWF Hegel's Philosophy of Religion, where God also empties himself of divinity in order to start time and create the universe because he realized that his pure existence is meaningless. Time is the progress of God, the spirit of whom is now extended in all matter, coming to 'realize' himself as God. So, in a sense, God is evolving.

      These theological moves (God is extended in the world and God is realized in the future) allow for dodging some thorny questions. For example, Can God create a rock that he can't lift? The answer is, for *now*, yes. But he might be stronger tomorrow.

    12. Re:The real question is really... by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      That's not the Virgin Mary, that's Bette Davis.

      p.s. there are no gods

    13. Re:The real question is really... by Kynde · · Score: 1

      Also going off-topic, God can't renounce his omnipotence. It is part of his nature. That is, even for God there are limits and omnipotence ... [snip]

      You just know it's april fools day when someone has modded that "Interesting".

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    14. Re:The real question is really... by Jekler · · Score: 1

      It's always been my theory that as mortals we're actually Gods pretending to be mortals. When we were omnipotent, we had the power to instantly do everything in the entirety of existence that entertained us, so we instantly got bored, and the only thing left to do was to render ourselves virtually powerless and erase all memory of our omnipotence. My current research indicates the epoch of this event was roughly 14 hours ago (when I woke up). All memory of prior existence was simply implanted by us with our omnipotent power. I was brilliant enough in my omnipotent state to foresee me figuring this out, and thus have created the threat of people who will lock me in a padded room should I announce my findings any more publicly than on a nerd message board.

    15. Re:The real question is really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm decidedly agnostic (or soft atheist, if you prefer), and I always have a good chuckle when people start discussing the nature of God.

      In my view, if God exists, he is unknowable by humans. I've always enjoyed the ant analogy. Expecting humans to understand God is like expecting an ant, crawling around his little yard, to understand a human. It's not a matter of thinking hard enough or studying long enough; human brains are not wired to truly understand the concept of infinite anything.

      Furthermore, I have always found the idea of God to be specious and ultimately dangerous. If I could remake the world, I would keep religions, but I would remove the idea of a sentient God from all of them. To me, religions would be better if they revolved around the teachings of an enlightened elder. The teachings of Christ or the teachings of Buddha, the only two with which I'm familiar enough to make this statement, have tremendous beauty and value in them. People should study them and take lessons for their lives. Instead of inventing a God in the image of man, let's just revere those truly enlightened individuals who walked this earth before us.

      If people could realize that every other person on this planet is just as special and self-important as he or she, we could accomplish some amazing things. Perhaps there is a God or many gods or whatever, but none of that should affect how I live my life and how I treat other people. You should be honest with and respectful to other people, because it's clearly the right thing to do not because you're afraid of God sending you to hell. One can live a pretty good life by simply behaving toward others as one would have others behave toward oneself.

    16. Re:The real question is really... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Alan Watts very effectively articulated many of these ideas and did an absolutely wonderful job of translating Eastern religions into Western thought concepts.

      I suggest reading one of his books or, more ideally, listening to one of his lectures. The CDs are a little pricey but you can try before you buy at just about any torrent site.

    17. Re:The real question is really... by caffeination · · Score: 1

      Actually, I made God mortal when I destroyed Akulakhan's Chamber. I can remember doing it quite clearly. He was pretty pissed off, but that's the price you pay for using exploits to become a deity.

    18. Re:The real question is really... by Kevor · · Score: 1

      thats actually two questions,
      Can a jedi make a light saber of a certain/minimum/any temperature? and
      Can a jedi weild a light saber with a/any given temperature?

      it is easy to understand what it means to answer yes to both of these questions.

    19. Re:The real question is really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually your fate is preordained by the Norns at birth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norns).

      And this, dear sir, is why I ride my motorcycle at 100mph on twisty roads at night while coked up and drunk. Cause you see, if it's my fate to die that way, so be it!

    20. Re:The real question is really... by Potor · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I am saying this on /., but my PhD work was on an aspect of Hegel's philosophy of religion. Hegel's concept of time was wack, however, since it only accounts for an objective progression. Clearly, that's only one way to understand time. Nevertheless, I grasp your point.

  17. My calculations say ... by RubberDuckie · · Score: 4, Funny

    The light saber would need to be 6241 F to cut through metal. At that temperature, the metal would be separated into sub-atomic particles called 'fooltrons'. As I'm sure you are aware, fooltrons are far to small to cause damage to the human body.

    1. Re:My calculations say ... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Incorrect. Nothing is fooltron proof.

    2. Re:My calculations say ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The light saber would need to be 6241 F to cut through metal.


      In that case, it would be easier to make the light saber use metric system, 3450 C would suffice.

    3. Re:My calculations say ... by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      Apparantly he underestimated the ingenuity of a complete fooltron.

    4. Re:My calculations say ... by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      This all seems rather foolish...

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    5. Re:My calculations say ... by makeyourself · · Score: 0

      Anyhow, you'd have to refer back to the fooltron principle:
      Make something fooltron proof and someone will make a better fooltron

    6. Re:My calculations say ... by buswolley · · Score: 4, Funny

      FoolTron --The adventures of Bush after getting transported into his computer.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    7. Re:My calculations say ... by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Uusers, salesdroids and manglement. (In the same tone as lies, damn lies, and statistics).

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    8. Re:My calculations say ... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      FoolTron --The adventures of Bush after getting transported into his computer.

      Is that in anyway related to Voltron?

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    9. Re:My calculations say ... by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

      I say to at least double or triple that. If you can cut through steel like air, you can probably cut through tungsten like butter.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    10. Re:My calculations say ... by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Tron. The movie.Google it

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    11. Re:My calculations say ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FoolTron --The adventures of Bush after getting transported into his computer.

      What, you mean his etch-a-sketch?

    12. Re:My calculations say ... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
      Tron. The movie.Google it
      Fooltron... Voltron. I'm going to assume the GP knows about Tron, but a Voltron reference would've been a less of a walk...
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  18. Mod me please? by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, since today the weirdest stuff happens out here, can I get this comment modded up? Looks like there just has to ask. Thanks alot.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Mod me please? by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only I had mod points. I wasted them all just before the pink crap showed up.

    2. Re:Mod me please? by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's all good, today is not a good day to have mod points anyways, I guess.

      Seeing how the grand-parent got modded, I conclude that I hardly understand any logic in the modders mind anyways. Instead of considering using quasars for encryption, they should rather consider using /. mods.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    3. Re:Mod me please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a lot" is two words.

    4. Re:Mod me please? by jibjibjib · · Score: 0, Troll

      If star wars sucks, this post will get modded up.

    5. Re:Mod me please? by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      mod parent up

    6. Re:Mod me please? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      OK, welcome to the land of the non-sense and consistance, when I posted the parent, the original post was at 0 (and there was at least 3 mods), now it's at +5, GO FIGURE!

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    7. Re:Mod me please? by BrianPan · · Score: 1

      Ok. Done. Your welcome.

  19. Afraid by Soulfader · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I don't know what the most frightening aspect of this topic is.
    • The extraordinarily detailed answers from people who spend a lot of time thinking about this sort of thing.
    • The retarded answers from people who don't spend a lot of time thinking about this sort of thing.
    • The retarded jokes forthcoming about people's pulsing hot lightsabers
    • The prospect of spending all day sifting through stuff like this looking for real news
    • The fact that I'm rather curious about this myself.
    I know very little of physics, Star Wars or other. So I shall link to the disturbing Star Wars-related musings of my friend instead.
    1. Re:Afraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats more frightening is that you created a bullet point list and took the time to plan out your post.

    2. Re:Afraid by Quaoar · · Score: 1

      I think the most frightening part is that half of your list hasn't even appeared in the thread yet...

      --
      I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    3. Re:Afraid by crayz · · Score: 1

      Yep. This guy had like post #4 in the thread. It was a nice troll though

    4. Re:Afraid by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "I don't know what the most frightening aspect of this topic is.
      -The extraordinarily detailed answers from people who spend a lot of time thinking about this sort of thing.
      -The retarded answers from people who don't spend a lot of time thinking about this sort of thing.
      -The retarded jokes forthcoming about people's pulsing hot lightsabers
      -The prospect of spending all day sifting through stuff like this looking for real news
      -The fact that I'm rather curious about this myself."


      The retarded "Here's an almost comprehensive list of what's wrong with this topic..." posts.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Afraid by nartz · · Score: 1

      Yo, I'm pretty sure chicks don't dig you because you don't have:
        * The extraordinarily detailed answers from people who spend a lot of time thinking about this sort of thing skills
              * The retarded answers from people who don't spend a lot of time thinking about this sort of thing skills
              * The retarded jokes forthcoming about people's pulsing hot lightsabers skills
              * The prospect of spending all day sifting through stuff like this looking for real news skills
              * The fact that I'm rather curious about this myself skills
      IDIOT!

        Who wants a lightsaber when you can wield a bowstaff?
        Why cut through steel when you can use dynamite?
      IDIOT!

  20. How hot? enough to burn the user? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looking at this comment I found, the author makes a good arguement: If the light sabre were hot enough to easily melt stuff, wouldn't it radiate so much heat that it would burn the user?

    1. Re:How hot? enough to burn the user? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      It probably doesn't have that much surface area...

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    2. Re:How hot? enough to burn the user? by matt21811 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work for BHP (now Billiton) at the Slab and Plate product division. I worked in PC support and so didnt actually know much about the steel making. One day I had to visit the BOS (I stil dont know what it stands for), it was the area where they stored the slabs after they were poored. I got out of my car and was hit by a stifulling heat but I couldnt tell where it was comming from. I looked around and 40 meters away was a large slab, cooling in a neaby fenced yard. It was barely glowing red.

      If a light sabre is say, twice as hot as that then I dont care how small the sureface area is you are going to notice it if its less than 1 meter from you.

    3. Re:How hot? enough to burn the user? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      "If a light sabre is say, twice as hot as that then I dont care how small the sureface area is you are going to notice it if its less than 1 meter from you."

      To glow red, the slab would have to be about 700 K, but I think it's fair to say it has a large surface area.

      In comparison, the filament in an incandescant light bulb is about 2800 K, 4 times as hot. You do indeed notice it, but it doesn't burn you. And they have to coil the filament very tightly to increase the surface area enough to emit useful amounts of light. I don't know how thick a light saber is, but it could potentially be pretty hot without burning the person weilding it.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    4. Re:How hot? enough to burn the user? by NereusRen · · Score: 1

      Looking at this comment I found, the author makes a good counter-arguement: no.

  21. Hot? What about cold? by Paulo's+News · · Score: 0, Troll
    How do we know the light saber is hot? What if it is just really really cold?

    Paulo's News: Apple CEO Steve Jobs, conservative pundit Tucker Carlson are Father and Son

    1. Re:Hot? What about cold? by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      Well, it melted a door in Episode 1 when Qui-Gon jammed it through to make a hole.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    2. Re:Hot? What about cold? by aktzin · · Score: 1

      We know a light saber is hot because Qui-Gon Jinn used his to melt through a thick blast door on board a Trade Federation ship. This was at the beginning of Episode I. Remember, the door was glowing orange and liquefied metal was sliding from it. I don't think that would have happened with a cold or room-temperature blade.

      --
      Quantum mechanics: the dreams that stuff is made of.
    3. Re:Hot? What about cold? by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      That, and Luke's wrist (and subsequently Anakin's elbow) were cauterized. I suppose there could be such a thing as "cryo-cauterization", but what little of the wound one could see looked more like the flesh had been cooked, rather than frozen.

    4. Re:Hot? What about cold? by Nitewing98 · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that the heat you are seeing is a by-product of the lightsaber converting the matter of the metal to energy. Remember, conservation of mass and energy requires that it all balance out to the tune of E=MC^2. So the amount of mass being disintegrated times the speed of light squared should equal the energy being produced.

      In other words, the moment the lightsaber touched the metal, you'd see a huge mushroom cloud.

      --

      Nitewing '98

      Everything works...in theory.

    5. Re:Hot? What about cold? by Paulo's+News · · Score: 0

      You guyyyyyys. It's april fool's day. Only here does one get called a troll for suggesting something as absurdly nerdy as lightsabers being cold. Today we're here to talk about ponies and ask for mod points. Case closed.

    6. Re:Hot? What about cold? by Valdoran · · Score: 1
      ... and ask for mod points.
      You need mod points, I need mod points, everyone needs mod points!

      But mostly I, clearly.
    7. Re:Hot? What about cold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is possible to use a laser scalpel to achieve cauterization (not sure of details, think it has a normal blade with a laser passed down one edge, to a reciever kinda thing). That is currently available technology, and used in operations where blood loss needs to be minimized. Presumably this does not create excessive heat or the surgeon would be burnt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_scalpel

  22. What I want to know is by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Funny

    could you toast marshmallows with a light sabre. On the one hand, there's plenty of energy, on the other hand the energy doesn't seem to go very far from the blade. I'm sure if you just touch the blade to the marshmallow it'll just vaporize though. Perhaps a wise Jedi, skilled in the force, could do this. Or maybe force lightnight. I guess you could heat a rock with a sabre and then toast with that, but it's just not the same.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:What I want to know is by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      a real Jedi would toast it with his mind

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  23. Shadows by Bombula · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember getting scolded by some fanboys for suggesting that lightsabers should cast no shadows (apparently they must cast shadows since shadows were present in Episode 4...) because the cutting edge - whether plasma or whatever else - would need to be hairline-thin regardless of temperature in order to slice through things without causing unmanageable explosions of melted and vaporized target material.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Shadows by Ruie · · Score: 4, Informative
      I remember getting scolded by some fanboys for suggesting that lightsabers should cast no shadows (apparently they must cast shadows since shadows were present in Episode 4...) because the cutting edge - whether plasma or whatever else - would need to be hairline-thin regardless of temperature in order to slice through things without causing unmanageable explosions of melted and vaporized target material.

      Well, assume for a moment that it works. To melt metal one needs a lot of energy - so it likely comes from a nuclear source.

      1kg of steel has specific heat of 448 joules per degree Kelvin.

      Energy from fusion of hydrogen atoms is at most 8 Mev, the energy stored in Hafnium atom is 3 Mev - let's assume that the agent used has weight of Hafnium but produces 1 Mev per atom.

      Thus 1kg of energy agent stores 9e10 Joules - plenty enough to heat 20e3 tonnes of steel to 10000 degrees - cool !

      So, as long as I am having fun, here is a "complete" light saber design - just so that no one tries to patent something that obvious:

      • Handle - let's separate in two compartments - one contains energy agent and the other initiator that bombards that agent with nuclear particles.
      • In response to bombardment energy agent produces new particles in much greater proportion - this is a sticky point as single pass stimulated emission amplification is likely not that efficient - but then we have power to spare ! In fact this might be a feature as the handle will last very long time - the amplification medium will deplete slowly and from one end.
      • the particles are passed through moderator which limits their mean path in air to desired length.
      • put peltier element around the energy agent and moderator and feed the energy into the initiator.
      • initiator could be made as short pulse laser striking metal foil - these have been tested as tabletop devices already and should be capable to produce 3Mev gamma rays.
      • move the initiator around as energy agent is used up.
      The particle fountain would be very narrow - but it will heat up the air and that would produce the glow. Oh - and plasmas are opaque to light so there will be a shadow.

    2. Re:Shadows by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Jesus, watch the friggin movies!! You forgot the midichlorians -- ASS!


      Or should I say, m'lady?

      Bemopolis

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    3. Re:Shadows by Ruie · · Score: 1
      Jesus, watch the friggin movies!! You forgot the midichlorians -- ASS!

      I did - and found it very enlightening that neither the democratic republic nor the Jedi counsel were concerned in the slightest about ethical issues of using an army of brainwashed human clones. Enlightening - both from the point of view of the story and the society it was made for.

      Or should I say, m'lady?

      Fellow hacker would suffice.. Also RTF link.

    4. Re:Shadows by Lalo+Martins · · Score: 1

      Nifty. Let's get venture capital and start a lightsaber factory.

  24. All your answers ... by psergiu · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... are HERE .

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  25. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...hotter than you'd like it.

  26. Hmm... by dtrmp4 · · Score: 1

    This post isn't girly enough! What will the girl users thing?!

    1. Re:Hmm... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      This post isn't girly enough!

      Exactly what I thought. I thought today all posts would be like "LMLAO OMFG ROFL KAWAII CHECK THIS SITE OUT!!!! G2G TTYL WUN!!!"

      I am disappointed.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Hmm... by cthellis · · Score: 1

      Girl users think?

      Heyoooooooooooooooo!

  27. OMG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG HOT!!! LOL!!!

  28. It's not an issue of just temperature by xiphoris · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's an issue of temperature AND power.

    Consider this: how hot does something have to be to melt an ice sculpture? Well, a match would do it, except a match can't provide the power necessary to melt a significant amount of ice.

    You need the temperature necessary to turn steel into a vapor (look that up on a periodic table of elements); you also need the power necessary to turn some mass (per second) of steel into vapor. Anyone with a background in chemistry should be able to look up the required information on a standard periodic table.

    The equation will look like this:

    (Steel's specific heat) * (volume of steel to vaporize per second) * (temperature difference) = power necessary.

    1. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by heiders · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dunno about you, but I've never seen "steel" on my periodic table. Maybe I have the unpatched version...

    2. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a welder. I work with steel every day. Both Galvanized and Stainless.

      You would be surprised by the number of people that don't seem to know that steel isn't an element. *sigh*

    3. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by gladmac · · Score: 1

      Melting an ice sculpture would be more about energy. A power requirement comes into play when you compete with your heat being conducted away.

    4. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      The power required is low because the volume of material destroyed is very small. When a lightsaber slices something, it's as if a very fine blade passed through it. So maybe the glow is energy leakage being absorbed by the air, and the actual blade is just a filament.

    5. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Aelran · · Score: 1

      Heat of fusion and vaporisation must also be taken into account. Power is also a time-dependent value.

      Thus:
      Energy required = (mass * specific heat capacity * deltaT) + (mass * heat of fusion) + (mass * heat of vaporisation)
      Power = Energy/Time, and is measured in watts.

      With one kilogram of iron, initially at 20 degrees celsius (given that steel is a compound)
      difference = 2841 degrees celcius. time to vaporise one kilogram = 10 seconds

      E=(1 * 449 * 2841) + (1 * 247000) + (1 * 6090000) E= 1275609 + 247000 + 6090000 E= 7612609 J

      Power = 7612609/10 = 761 megawatts

      This is not dissimilar power to a lightning strike or a small nuclear power plant. Unlike either, the lightsaber is very small, and unlike the nuclear power station, has no obvious cooling systems. Furthermore, if one reduces the time to vaporise to one second, the power output reaches 7.6 gigawatts, compared with a large nuclear power station's peak output of about 2 gigawatts.

      Note that no energy losses are taken into account here - all of the power is transferred directly to the kilogram of iron, and the decrease of transfer rate as the kinetic energy of the iron increases.

      These sums may or may not be accurate. I suspect they're in the appropriate regions, but my source disagrees with itself in several locations.

    6. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Steel is an element under FE. Steel the common name for the pure form of Iron. When Iron is mined it has a lot of carbon and other impurities in it. The process of putting iron through a blast furnace or folded, if your into swords, gets the impurities out of the metal and makes "steel". The refining process can be adjusted to remove varying amounts of carbon or arrange the carbon into a lattice. That is why carbon steel is less flexable. The Samurai sword is high carbon at the blade (hard holds and edge) and very low carbon along the back side (flexable hard to break, like those combs). Anyway that is why when steel rusts it turns into Iron Oxide. The other commentor is right about galvanized steel though that is an Iron Zinc Alloy.

    7. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Troed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Steel the common name for the pure form of Iron

      Uh no. Steel is the name given to various Iron alloys. Iron is the name for the pure form of ... Iron. You got it exactly backwards.

      Yes, I'm a Mechanical Engineer.

    8. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by shayster · · Score: 1

      The equation will look like this:

      (Steel's specific heat) * (volume of steel to vaporize per second) * (temperature difference) = power necessary.

      That only works if you don't lose any heat into the surronding metal. You'll need to know the thermal conductivity and boundary conditions of the steel you are cutting along with how long it takes to cut through the door. It's probably easier to use the force to prevent thermal conduction.
    9. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by void24601 · · Score: 1

      I figured it out, it's 1.21 jigawatts.

      *ducks*

    10. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by njh · · Score: 1

      The answer is a little surprising:

      specific heat of steel = 620 J/kg K
      latent heat of fusion of steel = 267 kJ/kg
      latent heat of vaporisation of steel = 349.6 kJ/kg
      melting point of steel 1515 C
      boiling point of steel 2750C

      energy to bring steel to melting point (1515 - 20)*620 J/kg = 926.9 kJ/kg
      energy to bring liquid steel to vapour point (2750 - 1515)*310J/kg (this is wild guess, as I can't find the specific heat of liquid steel) = 383 kJ/kg

      total energy to bring steel from room temp to gas: 926.9 + 267 + 383 + 349.6 = 1926 kJ / kg

      compare with energy require to boil 1 kg of water = (100-20)*4.2+2200 = 2535 kJ/kg

    11. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by d_strand · · Score: 2, Informative
      E=(1 * 449 * 2841) + (1 * 247000) + (1 * 6090000) E= 1275609 + 247000 + 6090000 E= 7612609 J
      Power = 7612609/10 = 761 megawatts

      Assuming your numbers are correct, your last conclusion is wrong.
      7612609 J produced over 10 seconds means 761260.9 Watts == 761 KILOwatts, not megawatts. Quite a difference.
    12. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Why isn't there a -1 Ignorant mod?

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    13. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Wow... what a n00b. It would be separate equations for each element comprising the steel, with heat (Joules)=specific heat*mass*change in temp. Not volume. People who are failing my high school chemistry 1 class could tell you that.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    14. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by munch117 · · Score: 1

      Dunno about you, but I've never seen "steel" on my periodic table.

      Then replace it with a more robust model. Any sturdily built periodic table should be able to carry a good amount of steel.

    15. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. It's partial specific heat times mass integrated with respect to temperature. Anyone with half a week of thermodynamics under his belt could tell you that. (Bonus question: what are partial specific heats the result of? That's right, overall composition. So separating the equations doesn't really help you at all.)

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    16. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Aelran · · Score: 1

      Eek! Hadn't noted that one. My apologies to all...

    17. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only problem is that steel is a good conductor, it would dissipate heat very very quickly away from where you want it to stay to vaporize the material.

    18. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by njh · · Score: 1

      Laser steel cutters seem to work well. I think that hot steel might be a rather poor conductor of heat.

  29. Start your calculators! by Crizp · · Score: 1

    With some geeks having actually having calculated the force needed to tip an AT-ST walker (or the weight of a walker or something - I've seen the site years ago and tried googling but found nawt) using a suspended log, I guess someone would be glad to help you out.

    More importantly, how hot would a lightsaber need to be to cut a pony into sausages? Pink hot?

    1. Re:Start your calculators! by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      Isn't it funny that you nitpick incorrect spelling in your sig, then turn around and spell "naught" wrong in your post.

    2. Re:Start your calculators! by Crizp · · Score: 1

      OMG PONIES!!! I knew I should've checked that. I appreciate the correction and will forever remember how it is written.

    3. Re:Start your calculators! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Happen he's from Yorkshire, in which case he spelled "nowt" wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  30. Could Jesus microwave a burrito by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    Worst. Quote. Ever.

    The correct quote is:
    "Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot that he himself could not eat it?"

    pshh

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Could Jesus microwave a burrito by mrpeebles · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot that he himself could not eat it?"
      No, he could always eat the burrito, no matter how hot. He would just suffer while eating it. Horribly. For all our sakes. (And of course, since a Jewish man prepared the burrito, we Christians would hold the Jewish people guilty of this for the rest of time, or at least for a millenium or two...)

    2. Re:Could Jesus microwave a burrito by compro01 · · Score: 1

      that would depend on whats in the burrito. at some point, the temperature would be hot enough to catch fire and burn.

      whether his tolerance for heat would be below that point is the question...

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:Could Jesus microwave a burrito by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Your logic is flawed. Jesus would be capable of defying burrito thermodynamics and could prevent a burrito from burning.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    4. Re:Could Jesus microwave a burrito by redalien · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Initial assumption: A being called "Jesus" exists that can do anything. Can he microwave a burrito (whatever that is) so hot that he can't eat it? In order to be able to do this, he needs to create a situation where he can't do something. Contradiction. If this isn't possible, he can't microwave it to that temperature. Contradiction. There is a logical problem with the initial assumption, no being could exhibit those properties.

    5. Re:Could Jesus microwave a burrito by ThosLives · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's more concise to answer:

      "I cannot answer your question because it contains inconsistent assumptions."

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    6. Re:Could Jesus microwave a burrito by redalien · · Score: 1

      True, but if I did that there would be a good number of people who replied in sheer confusion.

  31. Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by GnoWay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always though it was funny that people did not buy into the success of the Ewoks in the last skirmish. They'll buy into death stars, light sabers, but then balk at the Ewoks.

    1. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by isny · · Score: 1

      OMG!!! EWOKS!!!

    2. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by RsG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh, suspension of disbelief only goes so far.

      It's been awhile since I watched the movies. I do remember that it wasn't just the ewoks that bothered me, in terms of suspension of disbelief. Most of what I found hard to swallow about the series was either science/engineering stuff ("laser" weapons that shoot bolts, a planet sized spacecraft with an unprotected vent leading down into the reactor), or plot holes. However, those can be excused if you take a step back and look at star wars as fantasy, rather than sci-fi. It may be unrealistic, but it's mostly internally consistant.

      What bothers people about ewoks is that they break from that internal consistancy. Here we have a mighty empire, ruling thousands of systems, with energy weapons, walking tanks and armoured soldiers - and they get their asses kicked by teddy bears with spears. How the hell are we supposed to see the empire as being this massive military superpower, when pointy sticks are all it takes to kick their asses?

      I think most people would have been fine with ewoks if they'd at least been carrying stolen imperial guns or something. It still would have been silly, but suspending disbelief would have been simpler.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    3. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      um.. the vent WAS protected. It was ray-shielded. However, since it was a thermal exhaust vent, it can't be both ray-shielded AND particle shielded: you gotta let something through to bleed off the heat. They chose ray, aparantly prefering the efficiency of evaporative cooling or perhaps they simply considered the risk of energy weapons to be greater than the risk of some crack pilot who'd been shooting wamp rats his whole life.

      and.. I thought the whole point of the ewoks was that they happened to be in the right place at the right time for such an insignificant race to affect the course of galactic history. there's a whole allegory thing goin' on there that apparantly you missed.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by RsG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you'd figure they'd at least put a grill on the business end to cover the thing. Or failing that, put a U shaped kink in the line akin to a sink trap. Hell, any configuration other than a linear hole going from surface to core would have been safer - and if a bunch of underfunded rebels can find that weakness just by looking at the blueprints, you'd figure that a big military with a budget would have found out about them during beta testing :-)

      Design by comitee at it's finest. That or ole' George couldn't be bothered to think up a more realistic excuse for making a planet sized ship go boom in one shot.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    5. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by LouisZepher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could be wrong here, but I immediately see a statement being made that says "technology bad, nature good" that one would often find in some fantasy-based video games. (Many say that Final Fantasy 6 is a prime example of this.) I can't say for certain whether Lucas meant this, however...

    6. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by Dmala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think most people would have been fine with ewoks if they'd at least been carrying stolen imperial guns or something. It still would have been silly, but suspending disbelief would have been simpler.

      Funny, I seem to recall hearing that in an early draft, the Ewoks were supposed to be a space-faring, semi-technologically advanced race. I think it might have even been that they were supposed to be Wookies. Then when the toy sales blew up after the first movie, Lucas re-wrote them into an excuse to sell plush dolls.

    7. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a gaping hole all the way to the core. The hit caused a chain reaction resulting in reactor overload. Probably all the rebels did was collapse the hole, causing the heat to build up instead of being dissapated, resulting in the destruction of the death star when they fired the superlaser.

      Of course, then you have to believe that the superlaser didn't have any kind of sensor on the port to disallow operation when the port is closed off, but that's not that hard of an oversight to imagine, especially if it was purposely put there to sabotage the plans a la DaVinci's notebooks.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      there's a whole allegory thing goin' on there that apparantly you missed
      Allegory. Right.

      There's a whole merchandizing thing goin' on there that you apparently missed.

    9. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by RsG · · Score: 1

      Hehe, can't beleive I got into this conversation... never knew the cannonical explanation. Ya learn something new every day.

      Anyway, chain reaction or gaping hole, you would kinda expect safety systems. RL reactors typically won't fail or meltdown without signifigant compromise to their backups, and their backup's backups. If star wars were done as literary sci-fi, the author would probably have made the battle more complex in some way to make the idea of a fighter killing something planet sized beleivable.

      See Larry Niven's Ringworld books as an example of a planet sized (larger, actually) construct that was almost destroyed - pages and pages are dedicated to explaining how things went wrong and why. Things like what systems failed, and why, where greed was involved, what things were sabotaged, why the people that should have been maintaining/protecting it died off, etc. It makes the idea of a massive construct being felled by something as simple as a solar flare seem plausible.

      But like I said, its much easier to view star wars as fantasy. If you accept the idea that it's a standard fantasy epic, supported with sci-fi backdrops and themes, then realism doesn't matter so much. Fantasy stories aren't expected to be realistic (they'd be terribly boring if they were), they're merely expected to be internally consistant, thus making suspension of disbelief possible.

      Which is where the whole ewok thing falls down. They aren't internally consistant with the other stuff in the movies. They're a great merchandising ploy, but they pretty much kill the whole idea that the empire is even remotely threatening. Both previous movies made it clear that the empire can't be defeated by brute force - ANH has them defeated by subtlety and sabotage, amd ESB has the rebels running away when attacked openly. But apparently the secret to killing stormtroopers, and their mechanized walking tanks, is using rocks and pointy sticks....

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    10. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by k_187 · · Score: 1

      yeah, Lucas himself has said they were originally wookies, but for reasons unexplained he "cut them in half and made the ewoks"

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    11. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1
      Here we have a mighty empire, ruling thousands of systems, with energy weapons, walking tanks and armoured soldiers - and they get their asses kicked by teddy bears with spears.

      Come on, I'm sure if you met an Iraqi insurgent in person under normal circumstances, they'd be nice... but calling them a teddy bear?

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    12. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      Anyway, chain reaction or gaping hole, you would kinda expect safety systems. RL reactors typically won't fail or meltdown without signifigant compromise to their backups, and their backup's backups. If star wars were done as literary sci-fi, the author would probably have made the battle more complex in some way to make the idea of a fighter killing something planet sized beleivable.

      Well yeah. Being that Star Wars is cast in the Saturday afternoon serial mold, there was a need to hurry things along and keep the tension high. Subsequently, long, visually unexciting subplots about infiltrators secretly sabotaging failsafe systems, hackers quietly silencing alarms and monkeying safety interlocks, etc. remained unexplored.

      Which is where the whole ewok thing falls down. They aren't internally consistant with the other stuff in the movies. They're a great merchandising ploy, but they pretty much kill the whole idea that the empire is even remotely threatening. Both previous movies made it clear that the empire can't be defeated by brute force - ANH has them defeated by subtlety and sabotage, amd ESB has the rebels running away when attacked openly. But apparently the secret to killing stormtroopers, and their mechanized walking tanks, is using rocks and pointy sticks....

      The point which the RotJ movie failed to get across (probably due to a shortage of dwarfs to wear teddy bear costumes) was that the ewoks outnumbered the stormtroopers by something like 30 to 1. It was unfortunate that it ended up looking like an even matchup, as the original intent was to show that one person can mount no effective defense against a horde of 30 vicious, furry little monsters, particularly in a non-linear guerilla warfare situation. The little buggers were supposed to be fast, vicious, and numerous; but instead what we got was fifty guys in stormtrooper outfits standing around while ten midgets hobbled by padded bear costumes wobbled around uncertainly throwing styrofoam rocks at them or prodding them ineffectually with sticks.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    13. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      Eh, suspension of disbelief only goes so far.
      Is this a bad time to mention Parsecs?
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    14. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by RsG · · Score: 1

      Hehe, well I did mention bad movie science as one of the things that bugged me :-)

      Anyway, "parsecs" is the least of the movies problems in terms of science fiction accuracy. Having the ships make "jumps to lightspeed", and not take years to cross even short interestellar distances, or having "laser" tech that fires oval bolts moving at a few hundred meters/sec max would be the top of the list for me.

      Misuse of the word parsec would be somewhere down aroundthe same level as having a giant, non-humanoid slug attracted to humanoid females.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  32. but... by bmecoli · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does this have to do with ponies? :( I want my ponies! DX

  33. The Holy Grail of lightsabers by Centurix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are of course running at room temperature. You think it's heat that cuts through this mental abstraction you call 'matter'?

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:The Holy Grail of lightsabers by ethan_clark · · Score: 1

      That was a well-worded response. +1 Awesome

  34. no, no you are all wrong by __aampey1734 · · Score: 1, Troll

    the correct answer is "who gives a shit?"

    1. Re:no, no you are all wrong by moochfish · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen anybody modded as a troll in any of these joke threads... until you. Congratulations troll boy. The joke's on you. =)

  35. Lightsabers work because... by Dracos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Light sabers (and all other Star Wars pseudo-science) work because Lucas has no idea how physics works in reality, and he doesn't understand that there is a point where suspension of disbelief can no longer support the premise,especially in an adult audience.

    1. Re:Lightsabers work because... by localman · · Score: 1

      Actually, I tend to find it works the other way for me. Most attempts at explanation in sci-fi seem to break my suspension of disbelief unless they're very good (like Ice 9 in Cat's Cradle). So I often prefer when they don't try. Lightsabers (as depicted) make no sense for a pile of reasons, but because he never tries to explain them I don't question it.

      Cheers.

    2. Re:Lightsabers work because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you gotta blame his Waldorf education. Those lot have some strange ideas about science.

      http://www.openwaldorf.com/atlantis.pdf

  36. I was actually asking a serious question... by Datagod · · Score: 5, Funny

    I submitted this as a serious question 24 hours ago (or so). Just my luck, the only time my question gets accepted its april fools, and the whole site is pink! LOL

    1. Re:I was actually asking a serious question... by bloodstar · · Score: 1

      But the real questions:

      Is the light sabre hotter than the pink of this site?

      Could you get it hot enough to melt the OMG Ponies!!
      And last but not least...

      Does Sailor Moon wield light sabres? if so... *Swoon*!!

      (As a total aside, my room mate stuck a mottled My Little pony on my computer and told me it was my pony because it was all mottled n stuff. So I have my very own Zombie pony.I pointed out the 'OMG ponies!' and she just stared blankly at the screen for a moment, then wandered off to go to work at a strip club.

      It's really sad that no one's going to believe this story. It's even more sad that it's actually true. :)

      --
      "The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble. I like my coffee black, just like my metal" - Mindless Self Indulgence
    2. Re:I was actually asking a serious question... by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well for a serious answer, take a look at model number six over yonder http://www.geocities.com/deathcommando.geo/ls.htm it's my favorite possible lightsabre operational model. To sum up, according to this model, a lightsabre is a rapidly spinning charged superconducting field. Given this model, the cutting is caused not by heat, but by the shearing off of the electrons that bind atoms together, thus, heat is not a problem for the operator.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    3. Re:I was actually asking a serious question... by maquah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To melt it, somewhere in the ballpart of 1515 C if it's 'mild' steel, the temperature depends on the mixture (alloy) of iron, carbon, chromium, the blood of sacrificial mice ... whatever else.
      .
      Can you melt steel with a laser? Yes ...
      .
      but melting it or vaporizing it [lots hotter - above the boiling point of iron], would, as a number of other people have noted here, involve huge amounts of energy, raise the temperature of the surrounding area and perhaps cook the laser-wielder, etc.
      .
      Probably the 'light' of a light-saber is something like ionic traces from the passage-through-air of some as-yet-unknown in the here-and-now power, as it vectors (y'know how things are in Hollywood) toward the steel ... and then the power released from dematerializing the steel flows BACK to the light-saber (it would need to be a self-recharging subatomic-powered weapon: running a gaget like that on a battery pack would be unwieldy)
      .
      Some people have considered the 'telekinesis' question, including why a person would need a light saber at all, if a master of telekinesis.
      .
      Using telekinesis as a weapon against living beings draws a the user into dreadful depths of the dark side ... it's not worth it.

  37. Pretty Damn Hot. by UnixRevolution · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A Lightsaber cuts pretty fast through materials like that. As for the metal bits we'll asume it propels them away from the user, somehow. As for the heat...a portable (55 amp) plasma cutter can cut 1/4" material at roughly 70 inches per minute. The plasma coming out is roughly 24,000 degrees, and is a stream traveling at 20,000 fpm. An industrial cutter can do roughly 1000 inches per minute. I wouldn't imagine its flame is any hotter than 30K degrees. a lightsaber, it seems, cuts WAY faster than that. I wouldn' t know how to estimate its temperature using the given info, but maybe someone else can.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  38. could it be... by torrents · · Score: 1

    is april 1st the one day a year slashdot is just a complete write off...

    --
    Get your torrents...
    1. Re:could it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue that it's the one day a year it isn't.

    2. Re:could it be... by torrents · · Score: 1

      if you don't get modded up there's something seriously wrong today.

      --
      Get your torrents...
    3. Re:could it be... by Tetris+Ling · · Score: 1

      You just have to look at the bright side. At least there won't be any dupes!

  39. so it depends by ridgecritter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    on how thick the light sabre active region is. If it's only a few molecules thick, the amount of material vaporized will be relatively low, given that most stuff it's slicing doesn't have very high thermal conductivity (limits heat spread away from the blade). It's too late at night to push the specific heat & volume numbers, but as a guess, if the active region could dump, say, 100KW minimum into a 10nm x 2" x 60" volume, there would be plenty of energy to immediately vaporize any material in that small volume. Since there's not much material being vaporized, there won't be much damage to surrounding entities (like the Jedi sword wielder) or fixtures. As for temperature, I think that will depend on the specific heat of the material being sliced, if we assume that the energy integrated over time being dumped into the material is constant. Something with a low specific heat (air, wood) will get to a higher temperature than something like water or flesh. Once you get over around 5000K, everything's a gas. Another way to determine the temperature would be to look at the emission spectrum of the air when the blade is energized. That would tell you how hot the air is within the blade active region. However, there seem to be big differences between the emission spectra of the Good Guys vs. the Bad Guys. That could complicate the determination of temperature. Just like the 4/1 Slashdot color scheme.....

  40. One hot muthertrucker by suso · · Score: 1

    Appearently, it would be just hot enough to cut through the support structure of the World Trade Center towers.

    1. Re:One hot muthertrucker by suso · · Score: 1

      Why do you say that? Are you saying I'm stupid?

  41. Not hot at all, until.... by MagicDude · · Score: 1

    Part of the canon regarding lightsabers is that they don't use any energy unless they're in contact with something else, something about perfect energy conservation. Thus, lightsabers don't emit heat unless you're using them for something.

    1. Re:Not hot at all, until.... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      how can they not use energy? they glow brightly in a color appropriate to some aspect of the character weilding them.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Not hot at all, until.... by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      Ummm, the force?

    3. Re:Not hot at all, until.... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      they glow brightly

      Safety feature.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  42. No by wrfelts · · Score: 1
    Most of the energy from the molten metal and expanding gas is absorbed into the light saber via the same force that forms the beam in the first place.

    geeez! don't youy know anything?!

  43. It's a plasma, contained by magnetic fields. by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    However, it's not a simple plasma. It would have to be a high energy density plasma, in order to look solid and act solid.


    The example I found of a Tocamac plasma is only red, but is 20-30 million degrees C. However, the lightsabers in the original (and therefore One True) Star Wars were white. This means they must be considerably hotter. The page I found on near-solid high energy density plasmas also talks about tens of millions of degrees - my gut feeling would be that to produce totally solid white plasma would require 40-50 million degrees C.


    Now, plasmas at that kind of temperature could quite reasonably be expected to slice through almost anything - steel included. Furthermore, anything that was vaporised would be repelled by the magnetic field and thus travel AWAY from the wielder. This does mean that if you are fighting someone with a lightsaber, you will get sprayed with high-energy plasma every time they hit something.


    There is one minor problem, though. Energy. If you want to maintain something at 50 million degrees, AND a containment field, a couple of duracel batteries won't cut it. Even lithium batteries will go flat very quickly. My guess is that the handle of the lightsaber, therefore, contains a wormhole linked to a gigantic anti-matter reactor.


    All you REALLY need to do, then, is find out where your opponent's reactor is hidden and turn it off. Their lightsaber will then be useless.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:It's a plasma, contained by magnetic fields. by Quaoar · · Score: 2, Informative

      A plasma doesn't behave like a black body, so the blade would not become "whiter" as the plasma got hotter. The plasma of choice would have a couple of visible spectral lines (depending on the gas you ionize), and making the plasma "hotter" would just make those specific colors brighter. You can doubly ionize and even triply ionize the gas, but these transitions typically fall out of the visible range.

      Also, the magnetic field by itself would just constrain the particles to the axis of the saber. There's no guarantee that the stuff you vaporize will fly away from the handle, it could just as easy fly towards the handle. I would guess that there's also an electric potential keeping the plasma from melting your hands.

      --
      I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    2. Re:It's a plasma, contained by magnetic fields. by Detritus · · Score: 1

      At those temperatures, wouldn't it emit massive amounts of x-rays? It's beginning to sound like nuclear fireball physics, in which energy is transported out of the fireball by a cycle of emission and absorption of EM radiation. It would behave like a small nuclear weapon.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:It's a plasma, contained by magnetic fields. by z4r4thu5tr4 · · Score: 1

      I was actually wondering why, if it were just a matter of being a plasma torch, why lightsabers wouldn't interpenetrate instead of clashing with cool sound effects. Does this mean that we should rename them magnetoplasma sabers?

  44. As a source familier with the source... by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 1
    'Wouldn't your average Jedi be horribly scarred by all of this"

    Why Yes!! as a spokesperson for Jedi Inc.. (LLC) I can safely state that all Jedi completing our online (tm) courses since 5/12/97 have an exemplary track record. Most scars from lightsabers now result in the loss of limbs and/or other LEBOoETO (Life Enabling Biological Organs of ExtraTerrestrial Origin). We have strived hard to maintain safe Jedi Training Environment, and can now report that most Jedi are not only scarred, but scared as well!

  45. When using one, don't forget safety! by sirwired · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember boys and girls, a lightsaber can be a dangerous weapon, and improperly used, it can hurt! Here are a few simple tips for Lightsaber Safety...

    http://www.atomfilms.com/af/content/your_lightsabe r

    SirWired

  46. delightful... by c0dedude · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've always found that reading slashdot on april fools is a good reminder that there are better things to do than read slashdot on april fools.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
  47. Technical Information Regarding This.... by morganix · · Score: 1, Funny

    There is a good webpage that has detailed information on this subject...

    http://www.exn.ca/starwars/plasmasaber.cfm

    1. Re:Technical Information Regarding This.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A plasma field contained in a magnetic field could be constructed to create a lightsaber. The plasma could be contained in the handle, when the switch is flipped the electromagnetic field is energized and the plasma is ejected within it. Although creating the high temperature of the plasma would require a large energy supply, the lightsaber would perform just as in the movies and is not a technical impossibility." -- Michael Ernst, Student, Miami

      The newbie does not realize the "blade" of such plasma saber could only be shaped as a torrus (a bagel). Google TOKAMAK for more info of theoretical calculations

  48. Paris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paris Hilton says:

    Thats Hot!

  49. Does a lightsaber cut with heat? by answerer · · Score: 1

    Most of the people seem to be assuming that you'd need heat to cut. Heat will melt something but you need pressure to cut. If a lightsaber was really just a forcefield a few molecules thick, you could generate a huge amount of pressure on the edge and potentially actually slide between the metal molecules and break the bonds. The breaking bonds would generate some heat but it shouldn't splatter everywhere. Naturally, the denser the metal, the harder it would be for the saber to slide between.

    1. Re:Does a lightsaber cut with heat? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there are contradictory observable facts about lightsabers.

      1: They cauterize wounds as they pass through; little or no bleeding. Ergo, hot.

      2: They are cool enough to be held an inch away from somebody's skin without causing any problems whatsoever - not hot.

      3: They, when stuck point-first into a heavy blast door, will cause the door to start to melt. Damn hot.

      4: They are not, however, hot enough to throw off heat for heating.

      And so on. Of course, this is a fictional universe; these are not the physics you are looking for.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  50. I don't think it's the heat that does the cutting by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always pictured the light saber to be something like tamed lightning. As it cuts metal, it doesn't melt it from heat but from the actual cutting action of really fast elecrons (or whatever) colliding with and knocking loose whatever the light saber touches. Except it couldn't be electrons because they'd be grounded out by the metal they're cutting, so it's some other sort of particle.

  51. Plasma cutter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A plasma cutter makes short work of steel, copper, anything conductive and you can hold it your hand without gloves. A decent sized one chews through 3/4 inch steel plate like butter. Couple of inches a second. So it's not insane from that standpoint. Really the problem isn't heat, it's energy. Couple of thousand degrees and just about everything melts/vaporises. If you had a plasma knife that could cut a 1mm wide swath, then yes if it had enough energy behind it, it would cut through steel, flesh, bone, kevlar armor, etc without any trouble at all. Such a thing would pretty much be exactly like a light saber.

  52. Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once grabbed my light saber at the wrong end.....

  53. You've got it all wrong by Robotech_Master · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not the heat...it's the humidity.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:You've got it all wrong by ahpaway · · Score: 0

      So you're claiming all the saunas in Finland run on lightsabers?

    2. Re:You've got it all wrong by heliocentric · · Score: 1

      So, a light saber is simply a mobile flowjet?

      (Or flojet, I'm not sure of the spelling, I see 'em on those biker shows on cable)

      --
      Wheeeee
  54. how hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So hot.

  55. Adamantium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of an old Fark thread. Could a Light Saber cut through Adamantium? Discuss.

  56. I was of the opinion ... by constantnormal · · Score: 1
    ... that the light saber worked by creating a localized field that suppressed the electromagnetic interaction, with the glow being a result of leakage of released photons as the protons and electrons combine with a ginormous release of energy.

    It isn't so much the steel/wood/flesh/whatever being "vaporized" as whatever matter is within the localized field.

    The resulting release of energy would blow the wielder of the light saber into nothingness, except for a second localized field that collects the energy and feeds it back into the mechanism to power the interior suppression field. It is leakage through the outer field that provides the visible "glow".

    But I suppose I could be wrong.

  57. Sheilding by bm17 · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, the steel will only spark and smoke when it conbines with O2. I think we need to assume that the saber's containment field would protect the moten metal from oxidizing.

    So, where are all these ponies I keep hearing about?

  58. Dr. Brown says... by cojsl · · Score: 1

    1.21 Jigga-Kelvins!

  59. Light Sabres do not generate heat by manowarthegreat · · Score: 0

    As any true Star Wars fan would know, Light Sabers work by rapidly vibrating molecules to achieved the spectacular cutting effect and "wwrroggg" sounds.

  60. It may come down to the physics by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
    if the cutting is done by heat then you may also consider the effect a cutting torch is having on steel where the majority of the residue is actually falling out away from the user.

    On the other hand - a lightsaber may involve a different kind of physics where the material is actually displaced by other force and the light is actually only a visual representation caused by the displacement field.

    Whatever - you have to study the physics of the StarWars universe first to come out with a solution to the problem.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:It may come down to the physics by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think the light is part of the process at all. It's a red, green, or blue (or sometimes purple) herring. The light is probably added by whatever OSHA dealy they had a long time ago to show where the dangerous part is...

      But the real question is: where did lucas get a telescope powerful enough to record all of this?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:It may come down to the physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's a sabre that's not heavy, i.e. a "light" saber.

    3. Re:It may come down to the physics by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I made the same mistake with the poem "The Charge of the Light Brigade"

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  61. Bueller....Bueller.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Africa hot.

    1. Re:Bueller....Bueller.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He's gonna be a fry cook at Venus!"

  62. Not a matter of heat by admerwill · · Score: 1

    Heat has nothing to do with it. The Monofiliment effect of a ray segment of light waves splitting apart atomic bonds does.

  63. Not quite by Soulfader · · Score: 1
    The retarded "Here's an almost comprehensive list of what's wrong with this topic..." posts.
    Clearly it's not "comprehensive" if I left this one out. Chill out; it ain't that serious.
  64. Tagging by Swaffs · · Score: 1

    Someone forgot to tag this story "aprilfools" with the rest of them.

    --

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

  65. Temperature and Power by twitter · · Score: 1
    It's an issue of temperature AND power.

    If it's just a heat transfer, don't forget that the rate of energy dissipation is dependent on temperature difference. All the power in the world won't do a thing unless it can be transfered.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  66. LOL by eh2o · · Score: 1

    OMG SOOOOOOOO HOT!!!

  67. They aren't hot by archgoon · · Score: 1

    Lightsabers aren't hot. The proof of this is in Empire Strikes Back. If they were hot, Han would have used it as a heating device. (Cmon! you know you want to mod this insightful!) :)

  68. Ok, fine, I'll do it by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    The specific heat of steel is 452 joules per kilogram per degree C.

    The melting temperature of steel is 1370 degrees C (room temperature is 20 degrees), so the the lightsaber has to raise the temperature 1370-20=1350 degrees C).

    Now (to pull some numbers out of my ass) let's say our hypothetical jedi swings a 1-meter-long-and-.02-meter-wide lightsaber through a bulkhead in a circular fashion, sweeping out a 120 degree arc. The volume of steel he has to melt is (120/360) * (pi*r^2) *width, where r = 1 meter and width = .02 meters -- 0.0209 cubic meters of steel.

    The average density of steel" is 7.85 grams/cubic centimeter. According to google calculator, 1 gram per cubic centimeter equals 1000 kilograms per cubic meter; therefore, 7.85 grams/cubic centimeter = 7850 kilograms/cubic meter.

    Thus: the lightsaber must melt (7850 kilograms/cubic meter) * (0.0209 cubic meters) = 164.065 kilograms of steel. This will require (164.065 kilograms) * (452 joules per kilogram per degree C. ) * (1350) = 100112463 joules of energy. QED.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  69. Modern Marvels ---Sci-fi Weapons tech. by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

    On related topics ... :

    1) anyone knows what propels bullets in the BSG universe? It seems that it is not ur usual gunpowder. Is it somekind of force field, or a combination of both?

    2) Also what is the actual yield of the latest type of photon torpidoes in the TNG universe?

    3) Can enterprises shields withstand a 40 megatone nuclear explosion? can they withstand a 40 kiloton one?

  70. Remember kids by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't use your light saber to open beer bottles
    Don't use your light saber to pick your teeth.
    Don't use your light saber to gut fish

    If you do any of these things, you might be a jedi redneck.

    Bubba-Boe-Bob-Bader: "Shoot, son come on over t' the dark side... it'll be a hoot"

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Remember kids by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      And of course...

      Do NOT taunt happy fun light saber!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  71. You Think That's Air You're Breathing? Hmnnz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The proper effect once one integrates with the force is one of negotiating the identity of the particles in such a way as to allow it's cooperation to joot paradigms. This is not technically *heat* at all.

  72. History of the Lightsaber by Nitewing98 · · Score: 1

    I believe that the lightsaber is like the 1000th decendant of the ColdHeat soldering iron. So the minute you put it down, the tip gets cool.

    As you know, the soldering iron reaches 800 degrees!!! So to find out the actual temperature of the lightsaber, you multiply the generation of the saber from the soldering iron (1000) times the temp of the original soldering iron (800 degrees), yielding the result 800,000 degrees.

    Elementary.

    --

    Nitewing '98

    Everything works...in theory.

  73. Assuming you have the right units, by praetis · · Score: 1

    Less than twelve parsecs.

  74. Obi-Wan's official answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You don't need to know the answer.
    "These are not the Slashdot articles you're looking for.
    "You can go about your business.
    "Move along."

  75. Tough Decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmmm...scars from molten metal bits flung from a light saber versus the scars from viewing /. 04.01.2006...yeah, that's a no brainer

  76. Very hot by Dylan+Knight+Rogers · · Score: 0

    Probably very hot, considering it had to cut through steel. I hate this stupid April Fool's idiocy. Give me real news!

  77. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by wipis · · Score: 1

    But wouldnt the particles flying off be extreamly hot or come off in some sort of radiation? Im not to good at particle physics. I need a refresher. Im just saying even then it would be dangerous. A saber is not necassarily that hot. It could just be very well focused. That and it can cut easily because it has no solid pressance so theres little or no drag. Not to mention a jedi is very stong so they can put a lot of force behind the blade. Think of it this way. blades work on surface tension. when the blade is a few particles wide it doesnt need to be hot or need much force to cut.

  78. How They Work... by ryanisflyboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Light sabers are pretty advanced pieces of technology. Let me try to explain how they work in basic terms.

    First off, you need to imagine a sort of 'shield' around the blade. It is this shield that actually forms the blade in to a specific shape and length. It uses micro-miniature deflector technology. It's all deflector technology these days. If you can picture a sort of transparent hollow tube you are on the right track. In fact, if a Jedi needs a non-lethal billy club he/she can simply switch off the fusion generators and start whacking you with the deflector shield. It won't cut your arms off, but it'll smart a bit. Now, last time I checked, if you've gone to the trouble to piss off a Jedi chances are he ain't gonna take the time to just beat you over the head with a deflector shield. He's just gonna slice you in two. So keep that in mind.

    Also, it's these deflectors that Jedi use to do that cool hand trick maneuver. They want you to think it's their hand throwing stuff across the room. Ever wonder what 'the force' is. It's just a case of misdirection: "HEY! LOOK AT MY HAND!" (As the Jedi switches his deflector on his saber to maximum using his left hand, down by his side.)

    Now that you have this sort of hollow tube shield deflector thing, fusion materials are inserted in to the tube. Then 'blaster' technology is used to ignite the materials and sustain a reaction. Blaster technology is pretty deep, and I don't have time to go in to it. Now, as you can imagine, it takes quite a bit of energy to keep such a reaction going. That's why you hear that cool 'whummm' sound as you move it around. You're holding a few megawatts of energy in your hands. It's also why you hear that crackle when you whack two of them together. Same tech behind the frekin' lightning bolt shooting out of the hands trick.

    The question was raised, why doesn't the superheated component of the saber just burn the crap out of the user? Well - deflectors of course. The deflectors contain the radiated heat energy to within a few inches of the blade. In fact, most sabers have a feature to adjust how much energy is radiated. This is handy if you ever find yourself stranded on an ice world. You just pop the thing in the snow, turn up the radiated heat, and you have a nice bonfire.

    You might be wondering, but Luke almost froze to death and he had a saber - what gives? Well - let's just say his saber was more of a 'hack.' You see, Jedi in the past have been burnt badly when Sith lords have used the 'dark side' to tweak the controls on their sabers turning up the radiated heat. You think Yoda was born looking that way?? No, saber radiated heat accident. Anikin really liked screwing with young Jedi by turning up the radiated heat when they weren't looking. Well, anyhow, one of Luke's "improvements" to his saber was to remove this feature. Oops. ;)

    So there you have it. Be sure to keep your eyes open for my O'Reilly book coming out soon: Light Sabers in a Nutshell.

  79. Knuckle Guards? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1
    Also, I am assuming that at least some of the metal would be vaporized and the expanding gas would fling bits of molten metal at the saber wielder. Wouldn't your average Jedi be horribly scarred from all this.
    Vaguely reminds me of a discussion a friend and I once had about how lightsabers don't seem to have knuckle guards. Theoretically, the best way to win in a lightsaber battle would be, once your saber clashes with another, just follow the saber back towards the user, where you can either slice off your opponant's fingers, or dice up the lightsaber. Obviously lightsabers are not saber-proof (we've seen 'em get chopped up).

    Of course, the obvious answer to this is the Vibrablade, as noted in Knights of the Old Republic. Made of a special metal that is able to withstand contact with a lightsaber. So, make a vibrablade-inspired knuckleguard. But, if that's the case, then why aren't ships made of the same material as vibrablades? Surely if it can stop a lightsaber, it can stop (or at least reduce the damage from) blasters and other weapons. Or why not make vibrablade based armor? Doors? Vehicles? Or even lightsabers? Oh, sorry. I better stop. I think I'm making Lucas cry.

    --
    Rawr
    1. Re:Knuckle Guards? by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      "But, if that's the case, then why aren't ships made of the same material as vibrablades?"

      Weight. The ships have to be light enough to acheive escape velocity off of a planet. Also who knows what requirements entering and leaving hyperspace has on a vehicle.

    2. Re:Knuckle Guards? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1
      Well, if vibrablade material was THAT heavy, then they probably wouldn't make vibrablades out of it (I doubt an ultra heavy blade would be a worthwhile compeditor for a LIGHTSABER!)

      Achieving escape velocity isn't something to worry about. Just build the ship in orbit. Not a problem. Seriously, when it comes to vehicles as large as Star Destroyers, I doubt it would be efficient to land the ship EVERY time! Seems like it would make more sense to do what they do in Star Trek: build a ship for travel in space, so build it in space.

      --
      Rawr
  80. Not just power... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    [Darth Sidious mode]

    Power!!! Unlimited power!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!!!!

    [/Darth Sidious mode]

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  81. It's directly subsumed by the FORCE. by kawabago · · Score: 0

    May it be with you.

  82. As hot as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the grits I just poured down my pants.

  83. More thought by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    Also, just taking the above analysis one step further -- let's say our hypothetical jedi cuts through that steel bulkhead in 1 second. That would make the power output of that lightsaber is 100.11 megawatts. For comparison purposes, my city of 28,000+ people drawns about 58 megawatts [on a nice fall day - no heavy load from AC].

    Sidenote: How do I know this value off the top of my head? A couple years back, in my parallel architecture class, we were discussing the power requirements of a world-class supercomputer. The rule of thumb is that one requires about as much power as a small city. I was asked to look into this and get real data. Luckily, getting the number wasn't difficult because I happen to know the head sysadmin of the local power company -- his stories always end with something on fire.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  84. HAHAHAHA by pyro+jackelope · · Score: 1

    what

    --
    28:06:42:12 - That is when the world will end...
  85. Sad by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

    Many Bothans died to bring us this article.

  86. Will only work with movie quality sabers by starrfighter · · Score: 1

    Out here in the "extended universe" (aka, Lucas's Outsourced Gameverse) my lightsaber can't break through organic matter in one swing...EVER and those aluminum grade shipping crates show no adverse markings after hacking at it for an hour. Some jedi i'm turning out to be.

  87. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by ultranova · · Score: 1

    As it cuts metal, it doesn't melt it from heat but from the actual cutting action of really fast elecrons (or whatever) colliding with and knocking loose whatever the light saber touches.

    Um, that's what "melting" means :).

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  88. How do you know it's not real? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    My wife's high school boyfriend had a theory about things like Star Wars. It went like this.

    All that exists is in the mind of God. To be in the mind of God is to exist. God is omniscient, therefore everything that's in a human mind is in the mind of God. Therefore Narnia, Barsoom, and Middle-Earth exist, and George Lucas committed genocide when he blew up Alderaan.

    Oh, and it's not just the temperature, it's the heat capacity and conductivity. If a light saber beam is a superconductor and has some mechanical push to it, then white heat should be adequate for ruining most materials. All you have to do is weaken steel and let its service loads tear it to shreds: if it weren't under stress nobody would have spent the money to put it there.

    Leaving open the question, why does a telekinetic Jedi who can lift a spaceship need a lightsaber? Why not just use the power of the Force to make unwanted objects fall apart?

    1. Re:How do you know it's not real? by BJH · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with introducing telekinesis into a story - you have to ignore all the deadlier uses of it to avoid making the possesor of the power invincible.

      For examples of such uses of telekinesis: blender blade inside a person's head, hole driven through their heart, needles in their eyes, twisting their head off, crushing their skull, collapsing their lungs...

      However, nobody with telekinesis ever seems to think of these methods. Kind of messes with my suspension of disbelief.

    2. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My wife's high school boyfriend had a theory about things like Star Wars.

      So your wife is a high school teacher in Florida?

    3. Re:How do you know it's not real? by ted.hansson · · Score: 1

      > For examples of such uses of telekinesis: blender blade inside a person's head, > hole driven through their heart, needles in their eyes, twisting their head off, > crushing their skull, collapsing their lungs... Wouldn't this be the traditional 'Vader-choke'?

    4. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Funny

      > All that exists is in the mind of God. To be in the
      > mind of God is to exist. God is omniscient, therefore
      > everything that's in a human mind is in the mind of God.
      > Therefore Narnia, Barsoom, and Middle-Earth exist, and
      > George Lucas committed genocide when he blew up Alderaan.


      If that's true then holy god there are a bunch of Angelina Jolie, Sandra Bullock, Rose McGowan, and Alicia Witt clones floating around Yahweh-space with extremely sore pussies.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:How do you know it's not real? by kwark · · Score: 1

      So that makes Scanners (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081455/) "realistic" :)

    6. Re:How do you know it's not real? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      My wife's high school boyfriend...

      I had to read that line over a few times...

    7. Re:How do you know it's not real? by BJH · · Score: 1

      No, it wouldn't. You're telling me someone who can pick up spaceships and throw around multi-tonne debris can't crush someone's head in a fraction of a second?

    8. Re:How do you know it's not real? by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      No, because everyone has a certain affinity for the force. Obviously what occurs is person A's affinity cancels out Vader's ability to act on them directly. Only by harnessing the vast and extreme power of the Dark Side is he able to strangle them from a distance, and that's still only from maybe 10 feet.

    9. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      All that exists is in the mind of God. To be in the mind of God is to exist. God is omniscient, therefore everything that's in a human mind is in the mind of God. Therefore Narnia, Barsoom, and Middle-Earth exist, and George Lucas committed genocide when he blew up Alderaan.

      You know, I always thought God was a kick-ass premise for a really far out work of science fiction. Someone should write a book with that premise... oh, wait...

    10. Re:How do you know it's not real? by TikkiGod · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing he was a fan of Robert A. Heinlein's The Cat Who Walks Through Walls

    11. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Leaving open the question, why does a telekinetic Jedi who can lift a spaceship need a lightsaber? Why not just use the power of the Force to make unwanted objects fall apart?

      At the risk of coming off like a nerd, albeit one who likes tactics and strategy questions like this, I think the answer is: Against a non-Jedi, they don't. A Jedi can probably face down a lot of non-Jedis even without their lightsaber. As long as they carry one around they tend to use it against non-Jedis (no point denying yourself a resource, especially one that confers a psycological advantage even before you start doing mind tricks), but they don't need it.

      However, facing a Jedi at least partially negates that. Let us assume that it is easier for a Jedi to disrupt another Jedi's telekinesis than to actually do the telekinesis (since otherwise even the slightest difference in skill would be reflected by telekinesis coming up in every battle, which doesn't happen; this also means that when Darth is pummelling Luke in (IIRC) TESB that that demonstrates a huge power/skill disparity, and every other example I can think of of telekinesis during battle has a similar disparity, though I stopped reading after the Thrawn books). One exception may be telekinetic control of your own body, allowing for the leaps we see.

      Thus, for most matchups of two skilled Force users, telekinesis is not an issue, and they need some physical weapon that they physically possess to stand a chance. Light sabers are as good as any, within reason.

      It is, however, vitally important that the Force user not neglect to divert a small amount of attention to nullifying their opponent's telekinetic abilities w.r.t. their own lightsaber's power switch, lest the battle go shortly and very, very badly.

      (Oh, and this neglects talking about making things "fall apart", because I assume you mean simply by pulling them apart. There's no evidence for any sort of "disintegration" power.)

    12. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > (Oh, and this neglects talking about making things "fall apart", because I assume you mean simply by pulling them apart. There's no evidence for any sort of "disintegration" power.)

      Did Yoda not say, 'Size matters not'? I suppose that the question is how many molecules one is able to move at once so as to achieve timely disintegration.

    13. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Did Yoda not say, 'Size matters not'?

      Yeah, but I'm betting that's more platitude than literal truth. The evidence is that Jedi basically deal with normal "object" size, and even Yoda seemed to need to concentrate to move the X-Wing, frankly belying his own point. (That is, if "size didn't matter" than it should have required no more and no less concentration that a rock; clearly, there was a difference.)

    14. Re:How do you know it's not real? by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      No, because everyone has a certain affinity for the force. Obviously what occurs is person A's affinity cancels out Vader's ability to act on them directly. Only by harnessing the vast and extreme power of the Dark Side is he able to strangle them from a distance, and that's still only from maybe 10 feet.

      IIRC, Darth choked a man on a different ship while merely speaking with him on the videophone. That's a lot more than ten feet.

      Also it's clear that the schwartz is more powerful, for Lonestar was able to make the Robomaid switch from Suck to Blow!!!!

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    15. Re:How do you know it's not real? by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Babylon 5 handles this well.

      First, you have a large pool of identified telepaths, living openly in society. Those with psychic ability are registered with the Psi-Corps, which is supposed to function as a police force regarding telepath law. You have a much smaller pool of psychokineticists. If one of these psychokineticists were to commit one of those unique acts of violence, the authorities would know exactly who to look for, simply because there's probably only a handful of people actually capable of the crime in the system, and all but one will likely have excellent alibies. That's why, the psychokineticist does not go for those dramatic kills. Instead, the goal is to make it look like a stroke or a heart attack. You simply psychicly pinch a blood vessel shut.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    16. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      You know, I always thought God was a kick-ass premise for a really far out work of science fiction. Someone should write a book with that premise... oh, wait...

      Yeah, somebody already did. I think his name was Bob...

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Darth choked a man on a different ship while merely speaking with him on the videophone. That's a lot more than ten feet.

      Since we're all connected by the Force, all you have to do is locate the other guy. Seeing the guy makes it easy, but with enough skill you can do the the vader trick.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  89. Site unusable for silly crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remind me to not visit /. until monday.

  90. what heat? its a vacuum! by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    sabers are like vacuums. they suck!

    so, the matter involved simply moves out of the way. :)

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  91. I'm actually a jedi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm actually a jedi myself, and I haven't had any problems with my stock Light Saber (TM) product. At one point it was overheating a bit (1025 kelvin), so I called in customer service and they fixed it up in no time. I highly recommend them.

  92. They don't Generate heat by xenoterracide · · Score: 0

    Lightsabers do not generate heat. I forget which encyclopedia or other starwars resource that's from. But they do not use heat to cut. This does not mean that the things they cut do not get hot. I assume it's through some atomization process.

  93. Hone, Hone on the Range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised. All this talk about plasma temperature, antiprotons, electromagnetic bottles and all that high-techy stuff... Too complicated.

    The real secret is how sharp an edge you can get on your photons.

  94. Consider oxy cutters and plasma cutters instead by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting
    These things don't exists
    True, and the headline shows an ignorance of basic chemistry. Any oxy-acetylene cutter doesn't have to be hot enough to melt steel - the steel oxidises and burns away - so some sort of device that ionises air would be hitting steel with a lot of hot oxygen and burning it away. An oxy torch that cuts through steel like butter has trouble getting through aluminium alloy despite it having a melting point around 1000k less.

    Plasma cutters are something else again, real and possibly far more like a light saber would be if such a thing was real. Heating up a gas and making it behave a lot like a liquid to burn things away leaving nothing but a clean cut and hot dust is the way the things work - all you need is high voltage electricity, appropriate electodes and a good supply of pressurised gas.

    1. Re:Consider oxy cutters and plasma cutters instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any oxy-acetylene cutter doesn't have to be hot enough to melt steel - the steel oxidises and burns away


      umm, dude... don't know where you get your info from, but it is not from a metal shop. that is NOT how a oxy-fuel torch works. you have to first get the metal MELTED then use a stonger pressurized stream of oxygen to BLOW AWAY the melted steel.

      An oxy torch that cuts through steel like butter has trouble getting through aluminium alloy despite it having a melting point around 1000k less.

      oxyfuel torches have no problem cutting through aluminum wich i might add melts at around 1,500 F NOT 1000K ;-P

    2. Re:Consider oxy cutters and plasma cutters instead by dbIII · · Score: 1
      don't know where you get your info from, but it is not from a metal shop ... .BLOW AWAY the melted steel
      It is from a University and a metal shop - and demonstrating it to second year engineering students in a metal shop. The oxygen reacts with the hot iron and burns it away even when it is only red hot - which is why when you don't have a cutting nozzle or if you put nitrogen through the cutting nozzle instead it takes a long time for anything to happen.
      despite it having a melting point around 1000K less

      melts at around 1,500 F NOT 1000K

      You missed something - I was comparing the melting points of Aluminium and a typical steel and pointing out that a typical steel melts at a temperature 1000K more than aluminium. When you cut aluminium with an oxy torch you get a sloppy melted mess on the edge of the cut and it takes a long while to cut since aluminium ozidises in a shallow layer that sticks. It takes less time to cut through mild steel plate of the same thickness due to the oxide being weak and falling off as it is produced. I have seen this exact demonstration dozens of times - we used to show it to the second year engineering students as part of a manufacturing subject.
    3. Re:Consider oxy cutters and plasma cutters instead by JDevers · · Score: 1

      You should add that aluminum oxide is both non-porous and very tough stuff.

  95. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.starwars.com/databank/technology/lights aber/?id=eu
    br> Once unleashed, the power channels through a positively charged continuous energy lens at the center of the handle. The beam then arcs circumferentially back to a negatively charged high energy flux aperture. A superconductor transfers the power from the flux aperture to the power cell. As a result, a lightsaber only expends power when its blade cuts through something. So efficient is the blade, that it does not radiate heat unless it comes into contact with something.

    --
    "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
  96. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by BJH · · Score: 1

    Now explain how two lightsabers hitting each other act like solid broomsticks...

  97. APRIL FOOLS! by Eideteker · · Score: 1

    APRIL FOOLS!

    --
    sic
  98. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In order to make a semi-solid beam of energy which could interact with both matter and energy would require containing a quasar and quantum singularity inside the hilt. The gravitational field would pull all the quasar's expelled plasma back moments after the quasar releases them. The speed of the returning plasma would form a chainsaw effect allowing it to cut through the matter with ease, while when being stopped by an opposing beam. A modulated gravity field would bounce allow for the reflection of energy beams.

    HA! try another one

    --
    "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
  99. It's a Dry Heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because light sabers use dry heat technologies a Jedi doesn't notice the heat as much.

  100. Slashdot killed my inner nerd by SigmaEcho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Normally, my interest in applying practicle science to the star wars universe would be astronomical, but reading the question in pink GUI made me realize what a nerd loser I was. Thanks a lot slashdot. :-(

  101. About 3 fitty by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

    I'd say about 3 fitty give or take a tad

  102. Not so powerful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ever actually watched a scene where they cut through a door? It's not like it's going through thin air at all. If you believe the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, a katana slices through metal much more easily and so a ninja would beat a jedi.

  103. how hot... by robgue · · Score: 1

    so that'd be one, maybe two pentiums. OWNED! OMG!!1111 LOLLOLOLOLOLOLO

  104. Use the Force! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Of course, melting steel with your light saber WOULD create sparks and WOULD burn you. If you're not a Jedi. A light saber is more dangerous to yourself than your enemy if you're weak in the Force.

    The Force protects the Jedi, it guides his weapon to deflect the dangerous sparks and other things that would harm him. If he is strong in the Force, if he has faith in it, nothing can harm him.

    This is one of the reasons why you see Light Sabers only in the hands of Jedis and not of the ordinary man. They're cool, so why do you think only Jedis wield them, hmmmm? It is so easy, Padawan. So easy, and so difficult at the same time. Like many things in the Force.

    (Besides, metaphysical crap has worked as an excuse for other religions why some things work that make no sense in their li'l universe. Why shouldn't we use it as an excuse, eh?)

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  105. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone ever calculated the temperature you would need to be able to slice through steel like it was thin air?

    No, I'm sorry. I'm heterosexual and that has to the gayest question I've ever heard. Fucking Star Wars faggot.

  106. That's silly by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everybody>/b> knows that the real reason for lack of miracles is the decline of pirates... I mean, SHEESH.

  107. Not temperature, but power counts. by henkvanderlaak · · Score: 1

    It's not the temperature that. The melting temp of any material can be looked up. It's how long you can *sustain* that temperature in your saver. The evaporation energy of the metal is drawn out of the saber and needs to be resupplied in enormous rates to be able to 'cut' fast. I do this for my work, metal sheet processing with lasers. We are very happy to be able to cut a centimeter thick metal sheet at several millimeters per second. We need a 1 kW laser for that, and the cut is only a hair thick. The laser light density is > 1 Giga Watt per square millimieter. If you want to cut wider and/or faster, no need more power. So with the light saver you'd need a small 1MW nuclear reactor strapped on your back for day-to-day use!

  108. I seem to remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it has something to do with Hot Grits :-)

  109. The real question is... by CagedBear · · Score: 1

    Can I get the particle beam in pink? With an I-heart-Ponies inscription on the handle?

    My daughter is only 2 months old, but they say it's never too soon to start introducing them to Jedi weapons.

  110. 20,000 fpm?? by dougTheRug · · Score: 1

    WTF is fpm? Furlongs per minute?

    1. Re:20,000 fpm?? by UnixRevolution · · Score: 1

      feet per minute. Furlongs would have been Fpm.

      --
      You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
    2. Re:20,000 fpm?? by dougTheRug · · Score: 1

      cool...

  111. Mod me up now! by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Yea, you show your lack of chemistry knowledge. I wonder if the high school you went to taught chemistry or at least, in this area, metalshop?

    Well, for your information, steel isn't an element, it's an alloy of Iron (Fe) and Nickel (Ni) with some carbon (C) tossed in (like good knives, high-carbon, non-stainless steel, keep excellent edges) for extra strength.

    Mod me up +5 Informative

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  112. Turn Off Tagging by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    It's really no fun when it says "AprilFools" on the front page!

    We kinda need meta tagging on the tags, so we can filter out things like that.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:Turn Off Tagging by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > It's really no fun when it says "AprilFools" on the front page!

      What's April Fools about it? This is an important question for nerds!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  113. Re: "Particle" physics by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Funny
    But wouldnt the particles flying off [...] Im [sic] not to [sic] good at particle physics.
    I don't think the "particle" in "particle physics" means what you think it means.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  114. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by Whiteox · · Score: 2

    That's simple!
    One's red and the other one is a whitey blue!
    Everyone knows that when a red light sabre and a blue light sabre connect, it sounds like 2 broomsticks hitting each other.

    You must've missed a few days at school....

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  115. Misconceptions about Lightsabers by SloWave · · Score: 1

    Jedi Knights were good about keeping their military secrets. They want everyone to believe that light sabers use some sort of super hot laser beam. However insiders know that light sabers are nothing more than a mono-molecular fiber in a stasis field. Try thinking variable knife. These were described long before Lucas came up with the term light saber.

  116. it can't cut through itself by themysteryman73 · · Score: 1

    remember, when you strike to lightsabers together, they don't slice through each other. So that probably adds to the argument that they're not actually hot, like someone said. Either that or their melting points are 7000+ degrees F. Or they could be using special develocitator couplings or some such, I don't know :P

  117. As hot as t thermal lance? by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    I believe a thermal lance burns up to 2500C.

  118. Answer from a welder - steel melts at approx. 2500 by koelpien · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work in a shipyard as a welder. I can tell you that steel "melts" at approx. 2500 F. However, other metals such as aluminum and copper are welded at much higher temperatures, Of course, something like ceramic is much more "unmeltable" than metal, and we wouldn't want to think that you could fend off a lightsaber attack with a ceramic coffee cup. It's not just a matter of heat. Of course, lightsabering could be said to be more closely related to plasma cutting than welding. In simplest terms, plasma cutting is a process that uses a high velocity jet of ionized gas that is delivered from a constricting orifice. The high velocity ionized gas, that is, the plasma, conducts electricity from the torch of the plasma cutter to the work piece. The plasma heats the workpiece, melting the material. The high velocity stream of ionized gas mechanically blows the molten metal away, severing the material. Then again, welding and plasma cutting only works with conductive materials, like metal. You can't plasma-cut an arm off. The another issue is that both welding and plasma cutting require your material to be grounded, plasma cutting requires a source of compressed air, and an incredible source of electricity/ amps in a power source the same size, or smaller, than several of our "D" sized batteries. We do know, however, from watching "Empire" that they have portable welders, which they use (uselessly) to defend Hoth.

  119. Its the thought stupid by ashwinds · · Score: 1

    Huh - must be a april fool prank. Everyone knows Jedis cut through steel by thought. The saber is to just light things up a bit and make it brighter -to make sure power of the dark side does not work against the jedi.

  120. Expanding gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still trying to figure out what gas you are talking about. I *think* you meant that the vaporized metal would turn into a gas??? I don't think there are any metals in the periodic table that have a gaseous state, but perhaps I'm mistaken.

    --
    Those that think they know everything are annoying those of us who do.

  121. Fun things to do with a Lightsaber by Whoozit · · Score: 1

    This may be a little OT, but the lightsaber talk reminded me of a parliamentary debate I was at once... debating is a time-honoured tradition and very serious matter, but usually the university leagues have some 'fun' summer debates that are just silly. This one happened right around the time Episode I had come out...

    One debate they decided to run backwards, so essentially the opposition got to build up the case for the government and proceed to destroy it, and they chose the resolution that Anakin skywalker should be anally raped by Princess Amidala with a lightsaber.

    The arguments for it centered around how it was a typical hazing ritual for new Jedi Knights, it would bring him and the princess closer together, and would bring Anakin closer to the force. Arguments against were, well, it would probably kill him (or at least scar him horribly, requiring some weird life support -- oh wait...)

    I just thought it was about the funniest thing ever. (yes, that may be quite sad...)

    (Until the following year, when a team ran a case that a conservative and inexperienced young woman on said team should have sex with the notorious womanizer on the other team, forcing said womanizer to argue that she should not sleep with him... that was awesome...)

  122. Exploding Bodies by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Considering that the human body is mostly water, wouldn't it flash to steam and blow up when struck by a light saber?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  123. I just used a thermometer on mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it said "98.6".

  124. NO HEAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No heat!

    Straight from the book!
    I remember reading this as a kid, too.

    http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=68

  125. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe antimatter, if such stuff actually exists.

  126. Lightsabers are spacewarps. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    Lightsabers are in reality linear spacewarps.

    Or portable singularities, to be more precise. What the lightsaber handle does is trigger a foldspace from an alternate universe, foldspace which is a "line" extending a definite length from the handle.

    Any matter approaching the singularity is accelerated until it forms a plasma which brightly glows (in vacuum, the glow is from virtual particles being caught in the singularity field). However, the high temperature around the plasma surrounding the singularity will also produce a positive pressure which will repel any rushing matter, thus balancing the "blade" and insuring that it does not suck outright anything like a black-hole; the constant pulsing of the plasma field interaction with the surrounding atmosphere is responsible for the "wvfooom-wvfooom" sound one hears near an active lightsaber.

    As the linear singularity itself is not in this space, when it interacts with another like linear singularity, it will form an immovable object in respect to the other singularity, thus insuring that one lightsaber can mechanicaly block another lightsaber, giving it a solid appearance.

    The high energy needed for the singularity sustenance is harnessed through the use of the Force, hence restricting lightsaber use to properly-trained jedis.

    1. Re:Lightsabers are spacewarps. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Han Solo used Luke's lightsaber to slice open the Tauntaun on Hoth.

      Please hand over your nerd license :-P

      --
      Eat the rich.
  127. I'm atheist, but there is an answer to that riddle by Eric+Coleman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can God create a rock that he can't lift? To give background information on this riddle, it is of the form where you have a card or piece of paper. On one side it says "The statement on the other side of this paper is true." On the other side it says "The statement on the other side of this paper is false." I'm not sure what the logical term for this type of paradox is called, but the God/Rock idea is very similar. The circular reference in the quoted riddle should be obvious. The solution to this riddle is not a question of God's power. As with most riddles the answer is found by using a vague or misleading definition of a word. The key term in this riddle is "lift." If God created a rock that consumes(replaces) all of spacetime then there is no concept of "up", therefore the rock can not be "lifted" in the normal sense of the term since "lifting" is relative to some other object. With this solution you have achieve a dual state instead of a nonsense state. If an entity can create this hypthetical "omnirock" then the free will of God comes into play. He can create a state where he can not lift the rock and can also create a state where he can by creating a smaller object in space move/lift the first rock; ultimately allowing relative movemnent. The final solution is that both states are possible and exist simultaneously. Look up 'Schrodinger cat' on google. QED

  128. So, Is This Like When Dr. Who.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    accidentally leaves his Tardis in reverse and steps outside?

    I always wondered how he would get it back.

  129. How hot isn't a light saber? by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    That's what I'd like to know

  130. IS NOTHING SACRED!?! by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1


    Today, even my Journal is Pink!!

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  131. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    It glows, wouldn't that glow feel like heat?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  132. How hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just slightly hotter than Angelina Jolie.

  133. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    The light sabers aren't really made of light.

    This is all a film, not reality. They're probably made of aluminium or something so the actors feel the right weight for their coreographed sword fight scene. In post production, ILM effects wizards sample the image into a computer and add the light effects. Light sabers won't cut anything, it's all done by trick photgraphy and CGI. The whole light saber thing is just done as a way to have sword fights in a sci fi movie, because George Lucas thought it would be cool. It doesn't stand up to any adult scrutiny.

    People that argue about how the technology works in science fiction films are on the way to serious mental illness at worst, an unhappy and lonely adulthood at best. If you ever spoke to George, he'd tell you to get a life and then apply for a restraining order on you. He wants cute kids to see his films, creepy single thirty something guys are too small a market to worry about.

    Ha ha, not really. April Fool. This post is just a reference to Emperor Palpatine's "where are your friends now" speech in Episode VI. Just testing your Jedi faith, padawan.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  134. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the plasma is held in place by a tightly controlled magnetic field (The exact formation method doesn't need to be known). Since the only way to do this without causing the plasma to stream one way is to have the field rapidly oscillate polarity. The chances of two lightsabers being in exactly the same polarity alignment for long enough to intersect are so infintesimally small the scriptwriters couldn't be bothered with it.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  135. Re: "Particle" physics by wipis · · Score: 1

    I dont mean like little bits of metal. Im thinking of atoms and sub atomic particles. But like I said I do need to brush up

  136. Your average Jedi is ALREADY horribly scarred! by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    Especially after seeing This Web Site

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  137. SWK by xamomike · · Score: 1

    Just pose the question to world renowned Jedi expert SWK http://www.jedimaster.net/ As you may already know, he knows everything Jedi, including the delicate art of saber handling, design and manipulation.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world; those who can read binary, and those who can't.
  138. A Jedi's Eyebrows by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 1

    If a light saber was, in fact, hot enough to slice through a steel bar like the proverbial hot knife through butter, Jedi would have no eyebrows.

    --
    - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
  139. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Really, you guys need to spend more time on weldingweb.com. They all know that to cut steel you only need to heat it to about 2200F, then you simply spray it with oxygen and it oxidizes which releases more heat and.... continues the cutting process. You don't even need heat after the initial heating to its melting point, just a steady flow of O2.

  140. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by CrowScape · · Score: 1

    Come into contact with something such as, oh, let's say, the air?

    --
    common sense: noun
    What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  141. RT Sound Convolver by woolio · · Score: 1

    I wanted to email you about your sound convolver project but couldn't find an email....

    1) Does this run in real-time without the convolution (i.e. just combining the streams together)
    2) How do you handle different streams having different sample rates?
    3) Are you summing all streamd and then applying the convolution? Or are you convolving a kernel with each stream and then adding the results?
    4) How large are your buffers? Have you considered cache effects?

    [For #3, both methods are equivalent, but one much more efficient than the other]

    1. Re:RT Sound Convolver by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      Oh crap, maybe I should add an address to my page... lol

      1) Does this run in real-time without the convolution (i.e. just combining the streams together)

      I'm not sure about what you mean. It will be able to run in real-time without the convolution, like forwarding the streams, provided that the convolution function gets commented out. That's basically what has to be done now.

      2) How do you handle different streams having different sample rates?

      You see, I don't know. that's what I'm looking for a device driver developper for, to taking care of that part. I didn't even know there could be such a problem, I thought that everything would be captured as one stream, mainly since it's supposed to "intercept" the stream that is about to go to the audio output, it should be a single stereo stream

      3) Are you summing all streamd and then applying the convolution? Or are you convolving a kernel with each stream and then adding the results?

      haha, well like I said I didn't know about that whole streams thing, but if there has to be such a problem, then the streams will have to get added together before convolution. The other way around would be incredibly stupid.

      4) How large are your buffers? Have you considered cache effects?

      I don't know, since I'm not gonna really work on the capturing part, I'd have to ask a device driver programmer what I can use. One thing is for sure, depending on the kernel length, but assuming that the kernel can contain frequencies around 20-30 Hz, the buffer sizes should better be at least 1024 samples long. Cache effects? i'm not sure to remember what it is, but i think it has to do with the data being moved from the memory to the CPU, whatever it is, it had to be included in my non-real-time prototype and thus be included in the performance I claim.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  142. How Hot would a light Saber have to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gosh!!
    Light Sabers are built by Jedi.
    They need to have a Jedi activate them - to complete the circuit - so to speak.
    They glow a certain colour depending upon the Jedi activating them - maybe?
    The glow may be a result of fields of the force disrupting the molecules of
    air as they randomly pass throough the force field.
    Accordingly the force field must somehow break up bonds bewteen atoms in
    a molecule without much input or traditional energy being consumed. This may
    be because they operate at a quark quantum energy level ? a bit like having
    the so called zero point energy field said to create and destroy particles
    but so fast its hard to see the needle move from zero on the particle count.

    SO the material's bonds are destroyed by a force field and only the density
    and bond strengths involved release energy as they are breaking down would
    effectively heat up the material as a side issue really.

    So the heat evolved is immaterial - it is the use of the force that counts
    and that is why so few true Jedi exist.

    Kind Regards
    CJT

  143. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The blades don't actually touch.
    The handle just vibrates as if you hit something.

  144. Re:I'm atheist, but there is an answer to that rid by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

    Put another way: You can't place God in a box called 'gravity' when God created such a thing as 'gravity' in the first place. If he is omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient, then the question simply becomes NULL for lack of a describable or definable context that could actually limit such an all-encompassing God.

  145. Antimatter by presapm · · Score: 1

    Light sabers do not rely on heat but the elimation of matter by an antimatter light saber "blade". That's why there is no splashing residue to scar the Jedi and why 2 antimatter light saber blades can clang against each other without damage. The humming sound the saber makes is a result of the atmospheric matter (air molecules) being destroyed as they come in contact with the antimatter blade.