Slashdot Mirror


Apple Pulls Out of India

tanveer1979 writes "Barely 3 months after it commenced India operations, Apple has decided to pull out its software operations from Bangalore. The employees will be given a severance package which is equal to two months' pay. The sales and marketing operations will remain on (these consist of around 30 people) but the software and support will be completely pulled out." From the article: "Apple had set itself a hiring target of 600 by the year-end. After a gala induction ceremony on April 17, the operations team went to Transworks for training. Some of the managers were about to leave for the US for further training when they were asked to stay put."

696 comments

  1. we were wondering too by yagu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last paragraph of the article, from an India employee losing his (or her) job:

    "On May 15, Apple officials addressed us and were highly appreciative of the workforce and the task it would execute in India. I wonder why they never said anything even then," said another fired employee.

    Yeah, there are a lot of U.S. employees familiar with that feeling. Welcome to the global market.

    Personally, I find it just as offensive companies whimsically shift work forces, often at high personal and financial cost to employees caught unawares, whether it be in the U.S. or India. I'd like to say, "see how it feels?", but I find no satisfaction in that. I guess the global economy does apply globally. It really does become about money on ledger sheets, and little about the workforce and impact on people just trying to make a living. Meanwhile CEOs and other execs reap massive rewards, usually with little relationship to how well their company does because of these decisions.

    (That said, the article is far too short on detail to understand exactly what prompted and triggered the change in plans for Apple.)

    1. Re:we were wondering too by Clay+Mitchell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      heh, if you want to feel small, insignificant and just like a number, there's no place better to go than a Fortune 500 company. I work for a very large bank, and I have absolutely no illusions about what I am to them.

    2. Re:we were wondering too by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But to change course like that after a mere three months? Sounds expensive. There must be a story behind that, and plenty of disgruntled amployees. Who wants to spill the beans? (and get sued by Apple :)

    3. Re:we were wondering too by Eric+Coleman · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd like to say, "see how it feels?",

      I'll say it for you then. See how it feels?

    4. Re:we were wondering too by bpd1069 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Globalization has one real goal, to commoditize the work force. We are just part of a balance sheet.

      --
      --
    5. Re:we were wondering too by cheaphomemadeacid · · Score: 0

      I'm probably one of those who should get a tinfoil hat but this smells government pressure all over...

    6. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. One
      2. Two
      3. Question mark (?)
      4. Profit (Exclamation mark (!))

    7. Re:we were wondering too by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      But that will lead to problems for the commoditizers as well. What happens if wage rates (adjusted for productivity) converge across the globe?

    8. Re:we were wondering too by Reaperducer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Holy pop-ups, Batman! The article link spawns THREE full-screen pops that even Firefox couldn't stop.

      Back on topic: There was an article in Crain's Chicago Business a couple of weeks ago saying it's hard times for the Indian outsourcing industry because wages in India are on the rise.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    9. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the popups... IE7 beta blocks them all.

    10. Re:we were wondering too by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If it's any consolation, the current CEO of Apple was once pushed aside from the company in pursuit of the balance sheet. ;)
      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    11. Re:we were wondering too by ygbsm · · Score: 1
      It really does become about money on ledger sheets, and little about the workforce and impact on people just trying to make a living. Meanwhile CEOs and other execs reap massive rewards, usually with little relationship to how well their company does because of these decisions.

      Do you really beleive that - executive compensation is based on what the Board of Directors believes the executive will do for them - the share holders; and boards have sacked more than one CEO for under performing. Their rewards are directly related to the value they bring the shareholder (and hence the company). I love technologists as much as anyone else - but if you are a commodity worker - whether highly skilled or not - than you are a commodity worker, and you add incremental value to organization.

      I get tired of hearing about "high" executive compensation, or high athlete / actor compensation . . . compensation is almost always about the value (in the case of a new hire - the expected value) brought to organization. People with rare, but high demand skills / talents will always be worth significantly more . . .

    12. Re:we were wondering too by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They don't give a fuck- they'll make their money in the short term, and damn the long term.

      Of course wage convergence isn't a bad thing- so long as it converges up, increasing the standard of living in the third world while not hitting the first too badly. It doesn't seem to be going that way though.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    13. Re:we were wondering too by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      All blocked by Safari. Maybe your settings are off?

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    14. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you on Windows?

      I'm using firefox 1.5.0.3 on OpenSuse10, with no extentions and I saw no popups.

    15. Re:we were wondering too by mellon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mass outbreaks of prosperity. Why is this so scary? If wages were pretty much the same in all countries, you would never again have to worry about your job being outsourced, and you wouldn't have to listen to lectures about children starving in China either. Granted, you'd probably be able to afford fewer toys, but I am pretty sure you would not starve to death.

    16. Re:we were wondering too by darkmeridian · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I'd like to say, "see how it feels?",


      I'll say it for you then. See how it feels?

      I'll say it for you, then: "See how it feels?"
      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    17. Re:we were wondering too by jcidiotashram · · Score: 1

      there is this article that i read about mergers and splitting of the big corporations. How they spend some 100 million dollars just to merge and within a couple of years they split the same business citing some other reason and again they spend same amount of money. the point is we don't hear the Wall Street guys complaining about this splits and mergers because they are the consultants who do the work of splitting or merging. finally they don't care about the shareholders.

    18. Re:we were wondering too by dfjghsk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Granted, you'd probably be able to afford fewer toys, but I am pretty sure you would not starve to death. Ah.. well as long as I don't starve.. what else do I need? sounds like a paradise.

      --
      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    19. Re:we were wondering too by mellon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can you call a thing paradise if, in order for it to exist, someone else has to suffer? And in fact can you call the life the average U.S. geek lives paradise anyway? I mean, if you're one house payment away from the street and pulling down $120k/year, is that really a desirable situation? It's just crazy.

    20. Re:we were wondering too by crazyjeremy · · Score: 2, Funny
      heh, if you want to feel small, insignificant and just like a number, there's no place better to go than a Fortune 500 company
      That reminds me of theonion.com article where a "kid" joins a "fortune 500" company... "McDonalds" :)
    21. Re:we were wondering too by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      Using Firefox 1.5.0.4 on WinXp, with the NoScript JS-blocker extension. I saw no popups.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    22. Re:we were wondering too by Joey7F · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows XP FireFox 1.5.0.3

      No problems.

      Back on topic, it should be no surprise that Indian wages are on the rise. While there are a billion people not all of them are qualified to take every job.

      Take tech support. If you are answering phones, you can't be merely functional in English you must be completely fluent and familiar with the culture, the idiomatic expressions, and, now, even adopt the American accent. The low hanging fruit has been picked. If you want talented people in India, the word is out, you got to pay more...or you have to in turn outsource to poorer countries.

      --Joey

    23. Re:we were wondering too by Somnus · · Score: 1

      The game in capitalism is not to make money, but to build equity. A job is nothing.

      You don't have to be a CEO or born with a silver spoon in your mouth to understand this, and gain from it.

    24. Re:we were wondering too by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean scary for the workers, but for the corporations. How can they get you to buy those toys?

    25. Re:we were wondering too by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I'd like to say, "see how it feels?", but I find no satisfaction in that.

      I, on the other hand do find satisfaction in this.

      India has been courting big business for a few years now. Their huge population creates a great supply of labor and when demand is low that translates into dirt cheap prices. Now, in spite of these low prices Apple has decided to pull out.

      I'd find a lot of satisfaction in it if the service and customer service jobs that have been flowing to India started flowing elsewhere.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    26. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean, if you're one house payment away from the street and pulling down $120k/year, is that really a desirable situation? It's just crazy.

      With very few exceptions, if you're pulling down $120k/year and one house payment away from the street, you've made some really, really stupid choices. That's plenty of cash to build a solid financial foundation. What's crazy is the fools who piss it away on piles and piles of crap they don't need, instead of being reasonable.

    27. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Well, here on Slashdot you're 43630!

      That's like Associate VP. I mean, A 16-bit slashdot id... looks like you're doing great work :)

    28. Re:we were wondering too by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you leap too quickly to the conclusion that moving jobs overseas is moral ambiguous. If companies want to sell in the US - I believe that the people whose lives are on the line to defend the US are entitled to a high priority in the job market. If a company wants to sell in india - that's great - they _should_ give the jobs to locals, but there is a moral right of people to have a place at the table in their own country when their economy is creating the jobs in the first place. If the rest of the World wants a first-rate country - they can follow our lead - create a rule of law - not a theocracy - for example, hold corruption accountable - etc etc, but to move jobs out of the economy which pays for them, while saddling that economy with the other related costs of your business is wrong, and should be discouraged in the strongest sense.

      AIK

    29. Re:we were wondering too by ByronicADisruptor · · Score: 1

      You couldnt be more right!

      --
      Embody Yourself In A Concept It Will Become Reality... Byron Smart
    30. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Life is inherently predatorial. Which is to say that for any particular life to flourish it must do so at the expense of other lives. This can be looked at from the perspective of organisms or more generally seen in thermodynamics where the lifecycle in general can be considered as increasing entropy. That is what is so ineloquently meant in introductory economics when one is told that there does not exist a free lunch. For any particular value of 'suffer,' suffering is inescapable because there exists a finite quantity of resources and a decreasing supply of usable energy for manipulating them. 'Wage' in the sense of 'fiat currency' is essentially meaningless for determining the distribution of resources. Every man, woman, and child could have in its possession an equal number of U.S. dollars which would remain constant regardless of any transaction. This of course would mean very little as to the welfare of those in possession of such dollars or any abstract currency for that matter. Such a situation would do essentially nothing to provide for the needs of the world population, and would simply push the currency out of use.

    31. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. I recently started working for a very large company (top 20 on the Fortune 500), and the one thing that continues to amaze me is just how insignificant any one person is.

    32. Re:we were wondering too by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's like Associate VP. I mean, A 16-bit slashdot id... looks like you're doing great work :)

      Either that, or he's exceptionally good at trawling eBay.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    33. Re:we were wondering too by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      Firefox 1.5.0.4 with Adblock and Filterset.G on WinXP/SP2. No popups.

    34. Re:we were wondering too by Reaperducer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Thanks. I have most of the buildings you mention already. Unfortunately, I also have a backlog of about 6,000 photos from 20 cities. They'll all end up there... eventually.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    35. Re:we were wondering too by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1

      Low Slashdot IDs are worth money? Dude!

    36. Re:we were wondering too by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      Damn, I should put mine up on ebay. How about a Freshmeat id in the low 300's? quad digit ICQ?

      --
      oogly boogly!
    37. Re:we were wondering too by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      Low Slashdot IDs are worth money? Dude!

      Yeah, seriously! I should've just registered when I started, instead of spending all those years trolling as an AC...
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    38. Re:we were wondering too by kz45 · · Score: 1

      Why is this so scary? If wages were pretty much the same in all countries, you would never again have to worry about your job being outsourced, and you wouldn't have to listen to lectures about children starving in China either. Granted, you'd probably be able to afford fewer toys, but I am pretty sure you would not starve to death.

      This will never happen..unless governments change. The main reason there are people in China startving is because the opressive government. Prosperity will only go so far.

    39. Re:we were wondering too by bigpicture · · Score: 1

      Corporations are run by people, and greed, selfishness and callousness, surprise you? How do you think that people get into positions of power? Because they are kind, caring, and considerate?

      There should not be any surprises here.

    40. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minor correction: "CEOs and other execs reap massive rewards" should read "CEOs and other execs in the United States reap massive rewards". In the majority of other countries, average CEO salaries are far more in line with the actual worth of CEOs (though of course some will disagree with that amount whatever it is). :)

    41. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life is inherently predatorial. Which is to say that for any particular life to flourish it must do so at the expense of other lives.

      Someone hasn't yet read any Kropotkin. (In other words, sometimes species survival or ecosystem survival trumps individual survival -- it's an evolutionary end-result.)

    42. Re:we were wondering too by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I should have too. ;)

    43. Re:we were wondering too by mellon · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see. Well, in fact, they seem to be able to sell toys even in countries where people make a lot less money per capita than we make here. Sometimes people pool resources. Sometimes they opt for cheaper versions of the toys. It all works out. But if you had a level playing field, I think that a lot of toys would get bought. Artificially keeping some workers at low wages and others at high wages isn't the cause of having lots of people who can buy toys. A prosperous middle class floats all boats.

    44. Re:we were wondering too by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      This is the oldest argument against global poverty ever...

      If everyone in the USA/world/wherever had to quarter (or more) their income, give up their toys, move into a smaller house, and change their entire lifestyle in order to bring everyone to the same level, that would not be paradise by your definition for anyone.

      If the grandparent were to feel that giving 50% of his yearly income to the poor and struggling with his house payment is his paradise, then he can see it that way.

      There will always be someone suffering that you can help, but at some point you have to draw a line and enjoy your life despite that.

    45. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean one house payment away from having to rent? That's different than being on the street. Try living like 60% of Southern Californians ... unable to afford a home at all. Try spending over $50,000 in the mistaken belief that a degree will help you earn more money. Try paying off this debt while working for $37,000 per year and being glad because you make almost double what any other person you know in your age group makes. In summary: you are over 30, paying off a college degree, making less than 1/5 of what you would need to make in order to afford a home (and you make almost double what everyone else you know makes). Now tell me, how does pulling in your measly $120,000 suck? I wish you people would get a grip. Just because you think your life sucks doesn't mean it does, it just means you like to complain.

    46. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be someone suffering that you can help, but at some point you have to draw a line and enjoy your life despite that.

      I hope you do see the circular reasoning inherent in your logic here. You're saying it's useless to try and help others because there will always be others that need help until your resources are exhausted. If you tackle global poverty with your solitary income, this is very true. The problem isn't that there isn't enough wealth, the problem is that a lot of people cannot stop thinking of the world in terms of only themselves.

    47. Re:we were wondering too by kirk__243 · · Score: 1

      Well said. Those who think that CEOs are overpaid are either ignorant or jealous.

    48. Re:we were wondering too by anaesthetica · · Score: 1
      Globalization has one real goal...

      Actually it has two, and the second is to be anthropomorphized in sensationalized terms by clueless posters on internet forums.

    49. Re:we were wondering too by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      It would be great for everyone to give what they can to help those in need, but in the end it comes down to solitary individuals making the decision. It cant be helped that people will think of themselves.

      But I am not saying it is useless to help others, I'm just saying that you can only do so much. When you are doing what you think you are able, then you need to be able to find gratification in that and not linger unhappily on the fact that you are limited in your means.

    50. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for me it didn't. AdBlock and NoScript mean I haven't seen a popup in a very very long time indeed.

    51. Re:we were wondering too by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The main reason there are people in China startving ...

      The conditions in China are not near to "people are starving"

      ...is because the opressive government

      Learn some history

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    52. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE/XPSP2 blocked all the popups.

    53. Re:we were wondering too by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      (That said, the article is far too short on detail to understand exactly what prompted and triggered the change in plans for Apple.)

      This may sound utopian, but I like to think it was feedback from customers.

      News Apple was outsourcing support to India promted a lot of compaisions to Dell and expectations of similar lousy tech support to come from Apple. This caused even more cries of "And what am I getting for the Apple markeup now compared to buying a regular PC?" that have increased with since Macs began using more common components and Intel processors.

    54. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect this is because the Anglo-Saxon model tends to ignore stakeholders other than the shareholders, and places an excessive focus on the short run. A CEO who produces higher short-run earnings for the shareholders will thus be highly valued, even if the other stakeholders (eg employees, and customers in the long run) are hurt by his policies. Consideration of all stakeholders (which is commoner here in continental Europe, and also I believe in Japan) would naturally then show the value of such a CEO to be far lower.

    55. Re:we were wondering too by Cicero382 · · Score: 1

      "Globalization has one real goal, to commoditize the work force. We are just part of a balance sheet."

      You only just noticed? You think this is new?

      Read your history and look up "workhouses". Since the very start of the Industrial Revolution workers have been regarded as assets - nothing more. Even today it's "human resources".

      Still, if anything it's improved over the last 200 years.

    56. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the rest of the World wants a first-rate country - they can follow our lead - create a rule of law - not a theocracy - for example, hold corruption accountable - etc etc,

      Just to be clear: You are being sarcastic, yes?

    57. Re:we were wondering too by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps unimpressed by these overpaid clowns telling the rest of us we're too expensive.

    58. Re:we were wondering too by Tim+Browse · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't understand, Marge. Those people looked deep into my heart and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined their website.

    59. Re:we were wondering too by maxume · · Score: 1

      Is it moral to make the US economy bigger and make everybody in the country better off(on average anyway)? That's what moving jobs overseas does. Buying "American" makes the workers and companies that make those goods better off, but it can make the consumer of the good worse off(they potentially get less for their money). Moving jobs out of the country frees up those people do other more productive jobs.

      What it comes down to is that trade is essentially always beneficial for both parties. Trading labor is no different.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    60. Re:we were wondering too by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      I've been pondering a lot about this, the costumer costs don't seem to depend on wether something is outsourced or not, so in the end it'll go to stock holders/CEO, etc. I'm much in favor for spreading wealth neatly over the whole world, and it will go this way at least a bit, but the biggest effect of this world-market-economy will be widening the gap between rich and poor and eroding the middle income group. We need some sort of an 'enrichment protection' to make sure this won't happen. Impossible in the US, but also the EU is more and more going away from this unfortunately.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    61. Re:we were wondering too by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      Apu: Hello. I am not interested in buying your house, but I would like to use your rest room, flip through your magazines, rearrange your carefully shelved items and handle your food products in an unsanitary manner. Ha! Now you know how it feels! (runs off])

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    62. Re:we were wondering too by ap7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmmm.... so when MGM makes movies in Hollywood and shows them in India, am I to insist that all the actors are to be replaced with Indian ones? Should be interesting to see Aamir Khan in that tripe Da Vinci Code instead of Tom Hanks. Maybe Indian actors in all the US and UK TV shows we get here? CNN and BBC also should replace its newsreaders and other staff with Indian ones, eh?

      Or perhaps we should insist that the CKD or SKD kits of cars that are imported should be made by Indians in the US? Boeing passenger and fighter planes ought to be manufactured by them in India by Indian workers only?

      You can see how far things can be pushed with the same rationale. Besides, businesses create costs in the US - but they pay taxes there too and not in India. With the costs they save on labour, they pay out increased dividends. Did you happen to forget that?

    63. Re:we were wondering too by jbellis · · Score: 1

      "Learn some history"

      I find it odd that someone would write this in response to a comment on China's oppressive government, especially wrt starvation. Aren't you aware that Mao caused the most deaths from starvation in history during the misguided "great leap forward?"

      20 to 30 million in 3 years.

      No, sir. You need to learn some history.

      --
      Carnage Blender : Meet interesting people. Kill them.

    64. Re:we were wondering too by Rasmus · · Score: 1

      How much?

    65. Re:we were wondering too by D3m3rz3l · · Score: 0

      Good points man. Unfortunately, you will probably never be modded up on slashdot for having a rational attitude about globalization.

    66. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really.. secgeek

    67. Re:we were wondering too by deesine · · Score: 1
      FF with AdBlock.

      Use these regular expression filters: '/\(ad)\W/', and '/\(ads)\W/'

      --
      damaged by dogma
    68. Re:we were wondering too by Duryo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most of us in the "1st" world are grossly overpaid as it is, for what your lives really require. Take away the 3000 sq ft home, an SUV in the garage, the 40" LCD TV, PS2, etc, etc and you don't really need the $80K/year job. $50K will do just fine, and you can live comfortably and simply in the 1500ft home, with a compact car,etc

      A little downward convergence would be a great thing for the world, if it was accompanied by an upward movement wrt our spirituality.

    69. Re:we were wondering too by DirtBag99 · · Score: 1

      My Firefox didn't open any popups but it alerted me that it blocked *7 popups* in total!

    70. Re:we were wondering too by moro_666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      oh man, i feel so depressed now ...

      anyway, i think apple got affraid of that alien bacteria stuff that we had an article around a few days back, even the in soviet russia they haven't found a cure against it ... maybe it started to affect apples ? :p

      ok, reality just shows out that it wasn't worth the money, they were not saving, they were spending and that's against the whole idea of going in there...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    71. Re:we were wondering too by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      often at high personal and financial cost to employees caught unawares, whether it be in the U.S. or India.

      Maybe people should stop living beyond their means and be prepared for labour disruptions at any time.

    72. Re:we were wondering too by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear: You are being sarcastic, yes?

      Just to be clear: You are being sarcastic, yes?

      (People who regard a first-world democracy as being morally equivalent to a third-world theocracy need to ask themselves exactly when they lost their marbles. (Or if they had any to begin with.))

    73. Re:we were wondering too by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      They don't give a fuck- they'll make their money in the short term, and damn the long term.

      This degree of 'churn' sounds like a money-loser. You should be pleased that Apple has learned a lesson.

    74. Re:we were wondering too by eweu · · Score: 1

      With very few exceptions, if you're pulling down $120k/year and one house payment away from the street, you've made some really, really stupid choices.

      Either that or you live in California. It's hard to find a house for under $800,000 here.

    75. Re:we were wondering too by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Can you call a thing paradise if, in order for it to exist, someone else has to suffer?

      If I mow a neighbours' lawn and he pays me $10 which I use to buy lunch, which one of us has screwed the other?

      (Hint: Economics is not a zero-sum game (unlike dating).)

    76. Re:we were wondering too by ccmay · · Score: 1

      You first.

      --
      Too much Law; not enough Order.
    77. Re:we were wondering too by binarybum · · Score: 1

      "Take tech support. If you are answering phones, you can't be merely functional in English you must be completely fluent and familiar with the culture, the idiomatic expressions, and, now, even adopt the American accent."

          Whoa! What kind of tech support are you calling? The platinum tech-support package that came with your new Rolls-Royce?
          Many of my tech-support conversations go about as smoothly as my conversations with cab drivers.

      --
      ôó
    78. Re:we were wondering too by Darby · · Score: 1

      But that will lead to problems for the commoditizers as well. What happens if wage rates (adjusted for productivity) converge across the globe?

      Then they will work to commoditize human rights at the lowest common denominator. i.e. they will basically revert us back to feudalism and/or slave labor.
      Murder a few democratically elected leaders and install some jackbooted thugs and it's done.
      Heck, this is the specialty of the CIA.

    79. Re:we were wondering too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for california and new york.

      But in the midwest/south you can retire on $80k after about 10 years if you are not being stupid.

      Or you can live like you are rich *after* about 10 years when the house and car are paid off.

      Personally, I'm going to also get about $10k to $16k of solar too so I do not have to worry about rising electricity bills.

      The nasty kicker in the states is medical insurance. You can have a million dollars and not be able to retire because you have to keep insurance going or you may be wiped out financially at any time.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    80. Re:we were wondering too by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      The Great Leap Forward occurred when? Late fifties / early sixties? Are people starving in China today?

    81. Re:we were wondering too by klez23 · · Score: 1

      Kinda spiteful there, bub. Are you implying that the Indian workers somehow did something wrong by accepting their job offers?

    82. Re:we were wondering too by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of us in the "1st" world are grossly overpaid as it is, for what your lives really require. Take away the 3000 sq ft home, an SUV in the garage, the 40" LCD TV, PS2, etc, etc and you don't really need the $80K/year job.

      As far as I can tell, it isn't $80K/year jobs, it's credit. There are all sorts of funky mortgages out there, for example. Balloon payments that can be re-mortgaged when they are due, interest-only mortgages that don't reduce principle, mortgages whose payments start low as a "hook" but go up after a few years, someone even mentioned that there are 50-year mortgages, etc. I was also baffled at seeing six and seven year car loans. It used to be that people would try to pay off their cars early and ride the no-payment gravy train for a while. There's also "no payments until past next year" financing for smaller items (furniture, electronics). The CC company keeps increasing my limit, even when I've never had a large balance, ever. There's also car title loan shops and check advance shops popping up everywhere--they must do a good business.

      Children need to learn about cash flow and how loans make banks money. This should be required learning in junior high/high school--before the first credit cards are issued. People are literally pissing away whole years of work for "interest" on small things like cars, beds, and big screen TVs. It's pretty sad.

    83. Re:we were wondering too by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Point taken, but the more substandard the service the greater the complaints which will ultimately hurt the company outsourcing the work. It is just one more factor for others thinking of doing the same.

      --Joey

    84. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, there are. lots.

      Go visit some of the smaller towns away from the cities. There aren't any bugs in many of those towns.

      They've all been eaten.

    85. Re:we were wondering too by FurryFeet · · Score: 3, Funny

      And based on your number, you should be quoting Abe, not Homer, gramps...

    86. Re:we were wondering too by faxafloi · · Score: 1

      You're being naive, my friend. Boards of Directors aren't objective guardians of shareholders' interest. They are more often friends of the CEO, or his kids' piano teacher, or other CEOs who have no intention of messing with the compensation gravy train. So they heap on the options to make it look like the CEO has a "stake" in the company's success, when in fact he has nothing at risk and can reward himself handsomely for mediocre performance. Between 1990 and 2003, Michael Eisner took in $800 million as CEO of Disney, while the shareholders did no better than they would have in Treasurys.

      This is well explained in Roger Lowenstein's Origins of the Crash. Read it, if you haven't completely closed your mind.

      --
      Exit, pursued by a bear.
    87. Re:we were wondering too by demachina · · Score: 1

      This was a troll right?

      Well if not.....

      "I believe that the people whose lives are on the line to defend the US are entitled to a high priority in the job market"

      Not sure what you just said. You are saying that companies should hire American veterans, like those serving in Iraq, ahead of everyone else? I'm assuming you are proposing Apple do this even if those people aren't even remotely qualified, though it sounds like the people they hired in India weren't qualified either. I think companies should hire people who have experience in the field and proved ability first, as in they should hire the most qualified applicants. The BIG problem with many companies outsourcing to India is they are getting a bunch of warm bodies that work cheap, but have no experience, knowledge or aptitude for the job and that often leads to a disaster. Hiring vets the same way would be just as bad.

      By the way the soldiers fighting in Iraq aren't "defending America" in any way shape or form. The war in Iraq had nothing to do with "defending America". At this point its probably increased the danger to America, and made America less safe, because its made most of the world really hate America, incidents like Abu Graib and Haditha in particular. In Iraq we took a country that in fact had nothing to do with Al Qaeda or 9/11 and turned it in to an Al Qaeda recruiting poster.

      "there is a moral right"

      There is no such right, never has been, never will be. Hiring is economics. If you make stupid hiring decisions based on "moral" grounds and you tank your company your board should fire you because you are an idiot. Hiring decisions should be based on the ability of the workers to do the work that needs to be done, and yes how much it will cost to hire them. Despite the recent corprate delusion to the country, there are many instances where hiring more expensive workers is the right choice, especially when they have more experience or ability in the field so you get better work, versus hiring a bunch of cheap offshore workers who have no clue what they are doing and it will take them a long time and a lot of training to learn. If the off shore workers are as qualified, can do the work, the company can handle the logisitcs and are cheaper they should get the job.

      "If the rest of the World wants a first-rate country - they can follow our lead - create a rule of law - not a theocracy - for example, hold corruption accountable"

      OK now you are either trolling or you are scary or naive. There are certainly countries worse than the U.S. in these areas but the U.S., especially lately, isn't so great you should be bragging about it like this.

      The Bush administration in particular has been decimating the rule of law in the country. The sterling example on Slashdot this weekend was state secrets privilege. This is a magic wand the Bush administration waves to make the rule of law disappear, for example it allows them to arrest and torture innocent people without being held to account, as they did to Khalid El-Masri. In the case of Jose Padilla George W. sought to prove that he can arrest and detain any U.S. citizen he feels like without charges, without access to a lawyer or the courts. The Supreme Court finally just said maybe he can't but they've taken their sweet time about it and he is still in jail without a day in court, and George W. packed the court with Alito since then. This is not the kind of thing you do in countries which have a "rule of law".

      "not a theocracy"

      The U.S. is most definitely closer to a theocracy now than it has been any time in my lifetime. Is it the Taliban, Iran or the theocracy we are helping build in Iraq, no, but the Bush administration has shredded the separation of church and state which used to make us a model of religious freedom and

      --
      @de_machina
    88. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My, that *is* a hilarious recollection.

    89. Re:we were wondering too by gigahawk · · Score: 1

      If only the standard of living was affected by wages. It's not.

      E co no mics

    90. Re:we were wondering too by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Standard of living is effected by your purchasing power- how much you can buy. Thats means its proportional to your wages.

      Like you said- economics.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    91. Re:we were wondering too by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      You mean this article?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    92. Re:we were wondering too by Knara · · Score: 1

      Wait wait, people sell their IDs on Ebay? What's the point?

    93. Re:we were wondering too by jaseparlo · · Score: 2, Funny
      How about a Freshmeat id in the low 300's? quad digit ICQ?

      A quad digit IQ would be worth more!

      Hmm but that might disqualify you from posting on Slashdot

      --
      All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
    94. Re:we were wondering too by Knara · · Score: 1
      Besides, businesses create costs in the US - but they pay taxes there too and not in India.

      Probably not as much as you think they do. What do you think accounting departments and finance wizzes are for? Not to mention oodles of business-friendly ways to write off things and reduce tax burden.

      With the costs they save on labour, they pay out increased dividends.

      This presumes that the stocks you're owning pay dividends. This is not the case for a very large percentage of companies.

      While its is true that the money they save on labour _may_ show up on the balance sheet as net profit, that assumes the rest of the company is well managed and not wasteful.

    95. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, a little over a month ago, Apple ended relations with their support site on the east coast who were a driving force behind Apple's support growing as much as it did. Presumably, they had ended relationships with them in order to begin outsourcing more support to India. This is pretty friggin' ironic because many of those people were under the impression that all of the support was going over there at one point or another. I guess they realized it wasn't a smart move seeing as you couldn't understand half the technicians over there.

      A little bit of trivia; they had the folks over in Bangalore watch "Friends" in order to get an idea of what American culture was like to better interact with them on the phone. Just a tidbit I found interesting.

    96. Re:we were wondering too by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I've been pondering a lot about this, the costumer costs don't seem to depend on wether something is outsourced or not, so in the end it'll go to stock holders/CEO, etc.

      It depends on what the rest of the market is doing.

      If Company A is the only widget manufacturer to outsource offshore, and is saving 20% on production costs, there is no reason for them to drop their prices by more than a few percent. All they have to do is undercut the competition by enough to get noticed, and they can capture the rest of the savings as profit.

      However, once everyone starts doing it, prices go down. Many consumer goods in the USA are much cheaper than they have ever been before, especially clothes.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    97. Re:we were wondering too by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      "Is it moral to make the US economy bigger and make everybody in the country better off(on average anyway)? That's what moving jobs overseas does."

      No, that is not what it does. It has contributed to a SHRINKING middle class, and a situation where fewer people are considering things like science education, because they know that's the first thing to go overseas. We have a ballooning national and consumer debt, to boot.

      The facts soundly refute you.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    98. Re:we were wondering too by Travoltus · · Score: 1
      There is no such right, never has been, never will be. Hiring is economics. If you make stupid hiring decisions based on "moral" grounds and you tank your company your board should fire you because you are an idiot.

      This is where you are completely out of your mind. Hiring is not just economics. That's the problem with you greed-is-god people; you don't see the moral side to it, therefore it doesn't exist in your mind.

      Corporations' lack of morality inflicts a major cost on society - some corporations create depressed opportunities for women and minorities, others gain profit from selling personal information to foreigners who come back and use it to steal your identity. Both are cases of immoral behavior which is profitable to corporations and highly damaging to society.

      Corporations' refusal to consider the morality of their behavior is part of why they are so hated now. Corporations forget that the economy is about people first and money second.
      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    99. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Corporations' refusal to consider the morality of their behavior is part of why they are so hated now. Corporations forget that the economy is about people first and money second.

      The problem is it only takes one bad egg to spoil the rest, so there must be legal constraints. For example, if I run my firm in a moral fashion, and you run yours in an amoral cost-minimisation fashion, you will probably have a lower cost structure, which means you'll be able to drive me out of business unless I abandon my principles and follow your example.

      The only way to prevent off-shoring to countries where workers are treated in ways we do not consider moral (speaking from a European perspective, I question morality of the 'voluntarily'the long working hours of American workers) is to have laws imposing penalties (eg tariffs) on countries with lower standards in such areas as labour and human rights. These must be high enough to make it unprofitable to outsource to countries with low standards of labour/human rights.

      The other thing that must be addressed is exchange rates, where certain countries are known to artificially push down their exchange rates in order to gain a competitive advantage. There should be a unified response to such countries, in the form of universal tariffs high enough to offset their currency games. However, where there are no exchange rate games being played, and human/labour rights are at acceptable levels, there should be no tariffs or other barriers to trade, except for taxes on externalities such as pollution (which will tend to favour domestic goods over foreign, since this cost will no longer be shifted to the population in general).

    100. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it moral to make the US economy bigger and make everybody in the country better off(on average anyway)? That's what moving jobs overseas does. Buying "American" makes the workers and companies that make those goods better off, but it can make the consumer of the good worse off(they potentially get less for their money). Moving jobs out of the country frees up those people do other more productive jobs.

      What it comes down to is that trade is essentially always beneficial for both parties. Trading labor is no different.


      Paul Krugman, a rather well respected economist, has demonstrated that increased trade is not always beneficial. Moreover, the advantages of trade are theoretical, and do not include the costs of friction associated with the adjustments necessary to produce optimal levels of output. This means that, whilst trade will eventually lead to higher output and greater wealth (assuming relations amongst the countries involved remain good, ie there are no wars or other disruptions), there is no guarantee there will not be suffering in some of the countries in the short run, owing to the friction of these adjustments (ie workers who lose their jobs, because the industries in which they are working decline, do not immediately and perfectly move to new jobs where they are more productive).

      The empirical evidence suggests that the long run in which the optimal situation is arrived at may be very very long indeed, even exceeding the lifespan of workers in some industries (eg the coal mining communities in the UK have still not recovered from the pit closures of the 1980s, and the evidence is that it will take generations for this to happen). Those who ignore such costly friction, owing to their limited and simplistic understanding of economic theory, can be very dangerous, if allowed to set economic policy.

    101. Re:we were wondering too by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

      The CC company keeps increasing my limit, even when I've never had a large balance, ever.
      Actually, that should be 'The CC company keeps increasing my limit, because I've never had a large balance, ever'. (Which I'm sure you already know).

      They don't make money if you pay off each month in full (well, they get the transaction fee, but that's it). The 18.8% APR interest is where the real money is made - and if you're living within your means, you'll never pay it.

      So they up the limit, to try and tempt you to over spend... "Wow, I can buy a new car on my credit card!"

      Don't forget, you can ask them not to increase the limit, or even reduce it. They shouldn't argue, since they're treading a thin line between enabling you to spend responsibly and luring you into debt!

      I agree entirely with this sentiment: Children need to learn about cash flow and how loans make banks money but I wouldn't limit it to children. The number of ads I see, offering to 'get you out of debt' by spreading your existing high-interest payments over 20 years... 'Reduce your monthly payments' should come with a warning 'by paying three times as much over the next two decades!'...

      Mark

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
    102. Re:we were wondering too by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      That's like Associate VP. I mean, A 16-bit slashdot id... looks like you're doing great work :)

      Eh? What? Someone actually cares about those IDs? Wow, someone is easily impressed. If you were of an appropriate gender, what would you do for a Fistful of Peanuts? Or a 2N2004?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    103. Re:we were wondering too by gigahawk · · Score: 1

      Inflation of wages decreases purchasing power. Have you actually studied any economics?:)

    104. Re:we were wondering too by maxume · · Score: 1

      I should have been more specific. Trade always benefits both parties of a transaction. If both parties don't think they will be better off after the trade, *they don't trade*. Hopefully anyway; they shouldn't. I am living in the midst of the friction by the way, it is rather interesting to watch the auto industry in Michigan die. But industries that are broken should be allowed to die.

      I find the attitude that complete strangers in the country I was born in should be more important to me than complete strangers in a country I have never been in stranger and stranger.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    105. Re:we were wondering too by mkopparam · · Score: 1

      Here's a bit more than the tid... Friends has been playing on television in India for well over five years. Apple breezes in now and recommend it to people who're accustomed to watching its reruns many times over. A pity, they seem to waking up late to their own culture. I'm not surprised they change their minds about moving back in two months - they must've just realised they're a Silicon Valley company!

    106. Re:we were wondering too by bobcote · · Score: 1

      With all the stockholders of companies screaming about executive pay, why has no one suggested outsourcing jobs of the CEO, CFO and yes, the CIO to a place with smart educated people who don't think it's moral to accept 8 figure bonuses even though the stock price dropped? That would be Oz.

    107. Re:we were wondering too by demachina · · Score: 1

      "some corporations create depressed opportunities for women and minorities"

      Actually in America its as common if not more so for women and minorities to get preferential treatment to the detriment of both the corporation and other workers. Many companies will hire women and minorities over more qualified applicants. Incompetent or rogue employees routinely level discrimination charges to prevent being held to account for unacceptable performance, seen it with my own eyes numerous times. One lady I used to work for was promoted not for ability but merely because the company wanted to fire a rogue woman employee who would level discrimination accusations everytime they attempted it. They promoted a women to be her boss simply because she could fire her and get away with it.

      When it comes to winning government contracts it is common practice to fabricate women or minority ownership because it gives the company a massive inside track on winning contracts.

      "Corporations' refusal to consider the morality of their behavior is part of why they are so hated now."

      And that hatred counts for next to nothing since people still buy their products because they are all operating at pretty much the same level. Most people still shop at Walmart, though everyone says they hate them, because their prices are better and only idealists with money to burn will pay more for the same product on "moral" grounds.

      You can run an extremely "moral" company but if you have amoral competitors chances are high they will bury you because they will underprice you. Being moral is a good thing for a corpration since it helps their brand and makes consumers feel good about them, but if its taken to the point it makes the company uncompetitive, consumers will still abandon them.

      Whether you like it or not you are for the most part living under Capitalism and free markets and morals aren't at the top of the priority scheme. Not saying its right, I'm just being a realist and you aren't. If you want to try Socialism and have the government regulate corprate morality, go for it, as in move a place like France, and you will discover its bad too. France has gone to great lengths to protect their workers from malignant corporations. The end result is they now have a workers who are impossible to fire even when they deserve it, In such a system workers have no motivation to work because nothing can be done about it if they don't. They are completely uncompetitive in a global market and their economy is tanking as a result, and they have very high unemployment because businesses don't want to risk locating there and if they do they have a good chance of failing.

      A key reason that the U.S. has such a staggering trade deficit is due to the "morale" constraints businesses in the U.S. have so they are no longer competitive on a global stage. Environmental regulation, work place safety rules, relatively high wages and very expensive health insurance make American products completely uncompetitive against foreign rivals. Companies are offshoring at such a furious pace precisely to escape all the "moral" constraints on doing business in the U.S. The only way to prevent it is massive protectionism which probably will fail or you compell the rest of the world to adopt your morality which is nearly impossible to do.

      --
      @de_machina
    108. Re:we were wondering too by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have. Apparently you haven't. If wages go up certis paribus, purchasing power goes up. Now if you claim that raising wages will increase prices, then you're right if price inflation>wage inflation. But thats not necessarily the case. When you have a subset of the overall economy like the 3rd world thats hugely depressed in relationship to the first world, there's lots of room to grow before price inflation occurs. Its similar to the end of serfdom in the middle ages- a group of people who previously had low wealth were given access to more. Then end result was more total wealth in the world- both the rich and the poor got richer (although the rate of increase was manyfold higher among the poor, which isn't a bad thing).

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    109. Re:we were wondering too by MonkeyPaw · · Score: 1

      Crazy youngin's.

      Now get off my lawn!

      --
      My studio - www.graylands.ca
    110. Re:we were wondering too by sharkman67 · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Here in Connecticut a sub 2000 sq ft ranch will run you about $350K. And that's down about 50K from the past 12 months. Throw in daycare at 20K per year for a couple of kids, another 7K in property taxes and you have to clear 6K per month just to break even. We are not talking a car payment, food, heat in the winter or any toys. To live in southern Connecticut you DO need to make 80K just to survive. I'd hardly call 120K wealthy, barely middle class is a better term.

      Hey AC, let me guess, your 20-25 years old, single (probably no gf) and spend all your non work time on your computer. Makes it even better if you live in the midwest

      It's going to be a big shock when you grow up and start a family.

    111. Re:we were wondering too by gigahawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suppose that it can be true that wages rise faster than inflation in one particular area, in the short term. Inflation does not always imply a decrease in purchasing power. However, in the long term increases in standard of living and purchasing power are realized by increases in production efficiency. By being able to increase the quantity produced by utilizing the same amount of capital or labor real prices will decrease and more goods will be available to the market.

      More generally when employment and/or wages increase so does the price inflation in that market. India is a country that is already beginning to experience this, even if it's just in certain sectors it will eventually spread to all parts of that economy.

      The fact is that your comment a few posts ago about "they'll make their money in the short term" is in fact fine. Because who defines how long terms are? Any company making any money in any period is fine. It means more wealth, more products, more emploment, etc. The companies don't just take it and stuff it under a pillow, it gets spent somewhere else. Who cares if they move to 50 countries with 50 new industries. It just means cheaper products for you and I and a growing economy for you and I, and the rest of the world. This isn't a zero sum game, wealth is being created throughout the world by teaching other countries to use their resources to educate their people, create technologies, and use their comparative advantage in certain industries to make everyone happier.

      This is for everyone else not you: Someone would innevitably bust in here about how I wouldn't say that if I had lost my job to an Indian or something. Guess what, I have lost jobs to people. Big deal. There is no magic doctrine that says I get to do what I want when I want because I'm better than someone else and am more deserving. You get another job. You work at McDonalds if you have to. You do whatever it takes. If it hurts your pride and it's hard to feed your kids and yourself and they foreclose on your house and you have to live in public housing, then you do it until you can make it better. It's competition and everyone can't be on top. But throughout time more people will be better off because of it than are worse off.

    112. Re:we were wondering too by JacobO · · Score: 1

      Low Slashdot IDs are worth money

      I thought you said "Low Slashdot IQs"!

    113. Re:we were wondering too by JohnBeaulieu · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree with you more. I'm not sure how this global economy situation will pan out for employees in the long term, but when companies get bigger they tend treat employees more like disposable assets then people. Alot of people don't realize that negative affects are felt in other nations then their own as well.

    114. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually in America its as common if not more so for women and minorities to get preferential treatment to the detriment of both the corporation and other workers.

      That is because of the 1964 Civil Rights Act - a Government act of "interference" - not because of corporate morals.

      And that hatred counts for next to nothing since people still buy their products because they are all operating at pretty much the same level. Most people still shop at Walmart, though everyone says they hate them, because their prices are better and only idealists with money to burn will pay more for the same product on "moral" grounds.

      Wal Mart is getting a huge amount of opposition now. They're not even allowed in many cities.


      Whether you like it or not you are for the most part living under Capitalism and free markets and morals aren't at the top of the priority scheme. Not saying its right, I'm just being a realist and you aren't. If you want to try Socialism and have the government regulate corprate morality, go for it, as in move a place like France, and you will discover its bad too. France has gone to great lengths to protect their workers from malignant corporations. The end result is they now have a workers who are impossible to fire even when they deserve it, In such a system workers have no motivation to work because nothing can be done about it if they don't. They are completely uncompetitive in a global market and their economy is tanking as a result, and they have very high unemployment because businesses don't want to risk locating there and if they do they have a good chance of failing.

      The problem with France is that those people don't know how to go into business for themselves and develop more home grown solutions. Screw the multi nationals. If multi nationals are so much greater for you than societies ruled by and for the people, then go form Wally World and go live there.

      For that matter, Somalia is calling. I'll even buy your plane tickets.

      A key reason that the U.S. has such a staggering trade deficit is due to the "morale" constraints businesses in the U.S. have so they are no longer competitive on a global stage. Environmental regulation, work place safety rules, relatively high wages and very expensive health insurance make American products completely uncompetitive against foreign rivals. Companies are offshoring at such a furious pace precisely to escape all the "moral" constraints on doing business in the U.S. The only way to prevent it is massive protectionism which probably will fail or you compell the rest of the world to adopt your morality which is nearly impossible to do.

      Environmental regulation is moral, ergo evil and anticapitalist? Error #1. A lack of environmental and workplace safety policy is why Union Carbide had that accident that killed so many people. Work place safety is more important than profits, because human lives are more important than profits. You don't have profits without people. That's a fact you can't explain away with simple-minded laissez-faire ignorance.

      It's necessary for the US to shut down all imports and businesses using child/prison / sweatshop labor and cut them out of the US market completely. The US market is far too ungodly huge; they'll get the message and shape up.

      America does not need to be held hostage by multinationals.

      I'm all in favor of taking up arms to go to war to defend human life as a higher moral imperative than the relentless pursuit of profits. Because in the end, it'll be people like you who poison my rivers and kill my family so you can make a buck, and I ain't down with that.

      But war is really unnecessary. Eventually your make believe world will choke to death and you will die off with all your pollution and deadly work places. Then when you're dead, we'll come in and take over :)
    115. Re:we were wondering too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A key reason that the U.S. has such a staggering trade deficit is due to the "morale" constraints businesses in the U.S. have so they are no longer competitive on a global stage. Environmental regulation, work place safety rules, relatively high wages and very expensive health insurance make American products completely uncompetitive against foreign rivals. Companies are offshoring at such a furious pace precisely to escape all the "moral" constraints on doing business in the U.S. The only way to prevent it is massive protectionism which probably will fail or you compell the rest of the world to adopt your morality which is nearly impossible to do.


      That sounds logical, but we have similar restrictions here in Scandinavia (arguably even stronger in many areas, such as labour rights), and yet we (Sweden, Norway and Denmark) have trade surplusses. The same is true of Germany, and most other countries in Europe, so your explanation is clearly ignoring other important factors.
    116. Re:we were wondering too by jrjarrett · · Score: 1

      Please. Tell me where there is a place where I can get a $50K a year job and afford at least a 1500ft^2 house. Where houses that size are affordable, one can't find a job. Where there are jobs, it takes $80K, $90K to afford it. We own a 1300 ft^2 house (albeit with 3/4 acre), but it takes two of us making $75K+ to comfortably afford it. And this isn't Silicon Valley.

  2. They were out sourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess a cheaper country was found

    1. Re:They were out sourced by vought · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess a cheaper country was found

      Given Apple's history with outsourced phone groups (burned by SEI's horrible quality and retention in the mid-90s), I sincerely doubt it.

      Apple probably saw that this approach wouldn't meet their quality goals. That's not a slam on Indians or outsourcing, but AppleCare and Apple in general is extremely sensitive to quality and customer satisfaction. 1995-1997 is still very fresh in their minds.

    2. Re:They were out sourced by harrkev · · Score: 4, Funny
      I guess a cheaper country was found
      Yup. Here.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:They were out sourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work for a company that outsourced its data mining to Russia because it was cheaper for us. But then later, we found out that the Russian team outsourced some of the workload to China because it was cheaper for them.

    4. Re:They were out sourced by Firehed · · Score: 1
      Apparently so. Of the three times I've had to call AppleCare, they were all answered by someone who spoke perfect English. Actually solving the problem and doing so politely was a nice bonus. And you know what? That'll play a *large* part in my decisions in future of whether to stay with Apple products (it's more important too, as it's much easier to find Windows troubleshooting online). Dell was like that once; thankfully, I started building my own machines around the same time they started outsourcing. I could swear I spoke to an Australian once at MS during the god-awful process of product activation, every other time an Indian and never particularly easy to decipher, and that's just another reason I use a Corporate version of XP rather than my legal copy - no calling, wading through phone menus, then being harassed, having to talk them into giving me an activation key and THEN actually understanding what they say.

      This is why the general premium of Apple products doesn't bother me much. They almost always "just work", and on the rare occasion that they don't, getting support is fairly painless and actually helpful. I've dealt with horrible tech support so long that it being decent is now a bonus, not an expectation. Apple's changing that for me, and I'm quite happy about it. And it *will* affect future purchases - I've got a 5G iPod and a 15" MBP, and I'm now considering a Mac Mini that without these good experiences I wouldn't have had a whole lot of interest in.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    5. Re:They were out sourced by johansalk · · Score: 1

      You're right. Best customer service I had was from Apple. I remember when AppleWorks messed up some coursework a girlfriend was doing one of the AppleCare people phoned her professor to tell him she'll have to hand it in late due to a computer problem. I thought that was excellent.

    6. Re:They were out sourced by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
      I guess a cheaper country was found

      Or Apple realised that outsourcing is good for normal companies, not for a company that tries to keep their stuff close to their chest/breast!!

  3. Payback's a bitch by LordNimon · · Score: 0, Troll
    "It started off with building dreams. We were not given any warning. They just told us the operations would now head back to the US," said a sacked employee.

    Looks like they got a taste of their own medicine.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Stick your manifest destiny up your ass. There is absolutely nothing that entitles you to get a tech job. The Indians can do the same job you do at a much lower cost. I know if I was your boss, I would probably say something like... "Thank god the racist prick is out on the street where he belongs."

      Now that being said, I think it's more than a little shitty of apple to stay 3 months and then move shop elsewhere. And I also think it's shitty that a lot of places are suddenly firing americans as well. Not everyone is a prick like the parent poster. I just think it's entirely unreasonable to be cheering on companies who are screwing their employees, because you didn't like it when they screwed you and hired someone else.

    2. Re:Payback's a bitch by mukund · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm surprised the parent post got marked insightful.

      It's not the Indian programmers' fault that US programmers' jobs get outsourced to them. So it's not exactly medicine they're delivering. US jobs get moved to India because US capitalists want to increase their profits by getting the same job done for less money in India.

      --
      Banu
    3. Re:Payback's a bitch by Senior+Frac · · Score: 0

      I disagree. I do not think they can do the job I can do, an opinion I believe is supported by the termination of this particular outsourcing attempt. My IT skills, cultural knowledge, communication ability, and physical presence give me the advantage.

      I just wish I would be paid what I'm truly worth. The H1B visa program needs to be eliminated. $250,000 salaries for awhile goes a long way toward improving our domestic IT training, importing labor just artifically limits those salaries. Let the immigrant IT workers jump through the same hoops the immigrant physical laborers do.

    4. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well i guess we still don't understand that we get what we paid for...

    5. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the immigrant IT workers jump through the same hoops the immigrant physical laborers do.

      I fail to see how forcing immigrant IT workers to jump through barbed-wire hoops would help anything. Maybe the exercise would decrease employers' health insurance costs?

    6. Re:Payback's a bitch by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Has nothing to do with racism, especially since Indian people are not a "race" (which, according to modern biologists, does not really exist anyway).

      The average quality of an Indian IT worker is lower than an America. Source? Practice. I've been in several different companies in the past years and I've seen what outsourcing does. Maybe in 10-20 years when things get more modernized and other factors improve it may be different but this is the true story. Outsourcing is being done to simply shave the bottom line at the cost of quality.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    7. Re:Payback's a bitch by dvNull · · Score: 1

      And I disagree with you. You may think you are hot shit worth $250,000 per year but the market does not think so. Just because you were educated in the US does not mean your skills,work ethic etc are in any way superior to anyone else.

      If anything, you seem to have a highly inflated sense of your capabilities just from the comment you made. When you stop walking with your nose up in the air you will understand what I mean.

      If you want to blame anyone for losing your job to outsourcing, blame your employer. Employers want to make a profit and they will always go with what is cheaper. But on the flip side, as India's economy gets stronger, it will not be so cheap anymore. And then the outsourcing will go to a different place.

    8. Re:Payback's a bitch by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      What I never understand is why they don't outsource the higher paid employees? You know, management.

    9. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the parent's comment is true - it isn't the Indian programmer's fault - most of the interviews and such I've heard from that part of the world on this phenomenon have been laced with some particular arrogance about the subject; for instance, stating "the only constant is change."

      Now the employees are on the business end of that change. It's ironic in an unfortunate way, but considering previous statements and publicity, it seems as though they aren't particularly thrilled when their saying comes true in its fullest form.

    10. Re:Payback's a bitch by fangr · · Score: 1

      I think that the grandparent post was trying to imply that in the same way that US programmers complain about jobs going to India (to save money), that those Indian programmers are complaining about the same thing happening to them as their jobs are being "re-outsourced" to even less expensive areas of the world. Unfortunately, the bitter/vengeful tone of the post obscured that meaning somewhat.

    11. Re:Payback's a bitch by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      If anything, you seem to have a highly inflated sense of your capabilities just from the comment you made.

      I think you have a highly inflated sense of your own capabilities if you think you have any way to know what the GPs capabilities are.

    12. Re:Payback's a bitch by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is absolutely nothing that entitles you to get a tech job. The Indians can do the same job you do at a much lower cost. I know if I was your boss, I would probably say something like... "Thank god the racist prick is out on the street where he belongs."

      So now objecting to my job moving overseas is racist? I don't care what race the guy who's doing my job is. I'm opposed to sending the job where I can't follow.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    13. Re:Payback's a bitch by tknn · · Score: 1, Troll

      So it is only okay if your job goes to someone in Wyoming or Georgia or somewhere where Americans are or are you saying you would follow your job anywhere?

    14. Re:Payback's a bitch by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what my qualifications are so have no factual basis for your assumption that I am not qualified. I believe I am worth quite a bit more than companies are currently paying. You also have no idea what the market really thinks I'm worth. The market has rigged it so that I must compete with an artificially inflated workforce. Is there an H1B visa equivalent for lawyers? I don't know. I might feel better about it if the lawyers and politicians had a special visa program for their fields too.

      If you truly believe the free market should determine my worth then so be it! I propose we leave it to the companies to discover, just as Apple has on this occasion, the hidden costs of outsourcing.

      I merely ask for no exceptions to our general immigration policy. My skills are not special per se, just in very high demand (note that industry says so every year once the H1B visas run out). Under a free market this means inflated costs for those services. If my demands get too high, let my peers compete to give me a reality check. I don't mind... really!

      The key point is that I am not asking for special treatment. Quite the opposite, in fact, as I am asking for equal treatment with other professions. Eliminate the H1B program.

    15. Re:Payback's a bitch by Vengie · · Score: 1
      Just because you were educated in the US does not mean your skills,work ethic etc are in any way superior to anyone else.
      I'm not quite sure that's true. There are a number of employers (world wide) that salivate over certain US degrees. A JD/LLM from the United States is considered a hot property. Ditto a degree from any of the "name brand" US schools. Save schools like INSEAD, Tsinghua, etc, a degree from Harvard, Yale or Stanford will carry you quite far. Also, I don't like your reasoning: Just because the market thinks someone is hot shit doesn't mean they are. Someone might be worth 250k and the market might not be willing to pay it -- and someone might be worth far less and the market might be willing to pay far more. Right now, the "market" is paying me almost 3 grand a week, and I really don't think I'm worth it. But I'm going to work hard, and we'll see how it goes.
      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    16. Re:Payback's a bitch by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone in California or Texas could follow their job to Wyoming or Georgia. I did it moving to Cincinnati. Following that same job to Bangalore is nigh impossible, for a number of reasons.

    17. Re:Payback's a bitch by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      The average quality of an Indian IT worker is lower than an America. Source? Practice. I've been in several different companies in the past years and I've seen what outsourcing does.

      Source? Anecdotal evidence. Which doesn't count for anything in a serious conversation. Try finding some published material to back up your claims.

    18. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Let's terminate the H1B program and simply have an open immigration policy. This whole artificially-deflated workforce through immigration policy is simply driving up prices and causing the exportation of jobs. When some Slashdrone suggests a salary of $250k for his labor, the cost of labor is clearly too high!

    19. Re:Payback's a bitch by Greslin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      There is absolutely nothing that entitles you to get a tech job. The Indians can do the same job you do at a much lower cost.

      Well, AC, you know what? In today's global marketplace, nothing entitles you to keep your tech job for longer than three months if your corporate benefactors have a mood swing. Welcome to the party, glad you're here, let me take your coat.

      Last number of years, Americans working in tech have had the blade of Indian outsourcing dangled over their heads, customarily as blackmail to force longer hours on fixed salaries. When there's just no more blood to be squeezed from the stone, boom, time to pack up, lay off and ship.

      Meanwhile - and I'm saying this from experience working for a large American telecom that fired damned near everybody a few years ago to restock with cheap Indian labor - the Indians coming in would take all this as a show of cultural and intellectual superiority over us pampered, lazy Americans. Not all Indians, but certainly more than enough to carry the stereotype. We Americans have spent the last five years being barely tolerated by Indian coworkers touting the "get used to it, global economy, cheaper and better" dogma.

      Now suddenly you're starting to sound like union men! Think it's shitty that Apple changed their minds? I've read other comments in this story pointing out that folks in India have extended families to care for, that they probably had to quit jobs they couldn't get back, etc etc etc. Well, the knife cuts both ways.

      You guys weren't being aggressively competitive. You guys were simply used. We know how you feel.

      Thing is, as we had to explain to our families why our jobs were being sent overseas, we knew the cold truth that you guys are learning now. It was never about better, or even about as good. It was about being okay while being cheaper. A lot cheaper. Period. Corporations did it because it's easier to look competent short term by cutting costs than by increasing income, and the unfortunate truth is that the American economy right now is still pretty much driven by cost cutting. It was also inevitable that, sooner or later, the incentive would begin to evaporate as those outsourced employees started asking for more money.

      A few years ago Dilbert did a strip where our boy tells PHB, "I have some disturbing news. We outsourced our customer service function to India a few years ago. Apparently, they subcontracted the job to Mexico. Then Mexico subcontracted to Vietnam, who subcontracted to the Philippines. . .. who subcontracted it to us. It turns out that we're the lowest-cost provider, because we lie about our hold times. In summary, we pay ourselves to hose ourselves. Are you thinking what I'm thinking?"

      PHB: "We should raise prices?"

      That's it in a nutshell. Again, welcome to the party - chips and dip are in the corner.

      For the record, I agree that doing a three-month cocktease in India was a shitty thing for Apple to do. But then, so was bottom-dollar outsourcing it to begin with. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

    20. Re:Payback's a bitch by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      While I agree that anecdotal evidence is really no evidence at all, keep in mind that most companies don't require signification citations before making the decision to outsource. They look at the bottom line, see smaller numbers, and have their own anecdotal evidence (i.e. rumors, etc.) and go ahead and try to outsource. So anecdotal evidence really is enough in a discussion like that.

      I don't know if American IT workers are really any better than Indian IT workers. I just know that every instance I've had first or second-hand knowledge of regarding American (and Mexican!) IT companies outsourcing to India has failed. It's come in over budget, lacking quality, and put everyone in a bad mood. In most of the cases, the outsourcing was abandoned; in on case, the company felt they had already sunk so much money in the investment that they had no choice to try to keep going and hope for the best--don't know how that one ultimately played out.

      Anywy, like I said, I don't know if this means that American and Mexican IT workers are better than Indian IT workers; perhaps its an issue of communication, time zones, and culture. I just know that every case I have had first/second-hand knowledge of outsourcing to India, it's been a disaster.

      I've been predicting for years that the outsourcing movement was nothing for American IT workers to be afraid of. I've been saying that companies were going to try it, get burned and/or see it just wasn't practical, and pull back. That's exactly what's happening. You can outsource manufacturing and low-skill/low-interaction jobs. But any job that requires communication and significant interaction with the customer (yes, including call centers) is not something that's going to work in an outsourced environment over the long-term. And we're starting to see the pullback I was predicting long ago.

    21. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Indians can do the same job you do at a much lower cost.

      No, they cannot. Not from India. That is pure fiction. It has little to do with them being Indians and almost everything to do with them being half a world away in India. The fat cats who run corporate American know this, too. That's why they are pushing so hard for H1-B visas. If outsourcing work to India really worked, and if H1-Bs really made the prevaling wage in the US, why would anybody want to pay more for H1-Bs? Simple, because outsourcing software development to India does not work. It's nothing but a ploy to convince weak-minded fools in the US to accept a flood of H1-Bs as "the lesser of two evils."

    22. Re:Payback's a bitch by raehl · · Score: 1

      ...like?

      Hell, you could probably move to India and NOT work. With a few month's savings you could live like a king and maybe even buy yourself a nice wife.

    23. Re:Payback's a bitch by deltacephei · · Score: 1

      Let the immigrant IT workers jump through the same hoops the immigrant physical laborers do.

      And also ensure that they get equally exploited, treated like shit and used as political pawns?

      The H1B Visa program is not worth attacking here. $250K sounds like a well paid lawyer or doctor salary, engineers in the US have never earned this kind of money on average, even before H1B became a hot button topic.

    24. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with "IT" skills are a dime a dozen and you're no different.

    25. Re:Payback's a bitch by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      ...like?

      How's the schools for your kids? Hows the job opportunities for the wife?
      What's the work visa situation like?

      Not everyone is a 23 year old fresh outta school with zero ties.

      A 'few months savings' might last a year or two? Then what?

    26. Re:Payback's a bitch by dvNull · · Score: 1

      Someone might be worth 250k and the market might not be willing to pay it

      Who determines these rates? Hell I think I should be paid $100 per hour to do data entry because my time is worth that much to me. That doesn't make me worth that money. The market usually determines what the going salaries are in that region. And it can be for better or worse.

    27. Re:Payback's a bitch by dvNull · · Score: 1

      You are right. I have no idea what your qualifications are. Just as you have no idea about the qualifications of people working in India or China or wherever else in the world they may be. Yet you did make the statement that your skills give you an advantage over people elsewhere.

      I don't know about H1B visas for lawyers, but similar visas do exist for doctors, nurses, auto mechanics (though its easier to get a green card as a specialized mechanic than a visa). I assume that its probably not as practical for lawyers as laws differ from country to country. But a human body is a human body regardless to a doctor, and a mercedes sold here can be worked on by a mechanic just as easily as a mercedes sold in Russia and a programming language in India will be the same as the same programming language in the US.

      You said your skills are in high demand, so this means inflated costs. Such as the inflated $250k salary you think you deserve. Like I said, I don't know what your skills are and what kind of work you do. But from what I have seen of IT people,most like to stroke their ego and inflate their worth.

    28. Re:Payback's a bitch by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      So now objecting to my job moving overseas is racist? I don't care what race the guy who's doing my job is. I'm opposed to sending the job where I can't follow.

      Of course you are. But, you're just stupid if you think that matters.

      See, companies exist to make money. There's no more or less to it than that. If you aren't the best, easiest way to make more money, than your job security is on the line. You get a certain amount of grace simply because you're local, you speak the same language, you're in the same time zone, and you're already hired.

      But, if you let some foreign programmer best you in a cost/benefits analysis, your job is toast. So become the very best at what you do. Produce lots of value with your time. Make sure that XYZ megacorp is making out by keeping you on board.

      And if XYZ megacorp can't see that, join the startup that will derail XYZ megacorp. Then get rich.

      See? Now matter how you look at it, becoming one of the very best pays. Well. Consistently. And perhaps fantastically! So invest in yourself. Take courses, read books, challenge yourself to become the very best that you can be at... something.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    29. Re:Payback's a bitch by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      And attached to every story about the MPAA/RIAA, piracy, etc are comments along the lines of "we reject your outdated business model - adapt or die!".

      I fail to see how it's really all that different.

    30. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is saying race doesn't exist. But race isn't purely identified by a simple congruence of genetic markers. Race is mostly a social construct based on identification of characteristics allowing an "us" vs. "them" classification. These characteristics can be a grouping of obvious (though meaningless) phenotypes such as skin colour, hair colour etc. or a grouping of other similarities, eg. belief systems, regional heridity etc.

      Race exists. But what many biologists like to point out is that there is no inherent heirarchy of racial genetics, and beyond a few superficial physical characteristics that races are more similar than dissimilar and that inter-race allelic variation tends to be less than intra-racial variation.

    31. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you. Seriously.

    32. Re:Payback's a bitch by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

      As a data entry employee, you have the ability to go out and test to see if you're worth $100 per hour to a potential employer. That right has been taken from me. I ask for it back.

    33. Re:Payback's a bitch by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

      The H1B Visa program is not worth attacking here. $250K sounds like a well paid lawyer or doctor salary, engineers in the US have never earned this kind of money on average, even before H1B became a hot button topic.

      Maybe engineers would be a lot closer to lawyers and doctors if the market had been allowed to run it's course during the dot-com boom? We will never know what engineers are truly worth until the different professions are on an even playing field again.

    34. Re:Payback's a bitch by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

      As I told another respondent, you have no way of knowing what my skills are. I happen to think my particular skills set me above many of my peers. I ask, however, to compete against the same potential field of employees that other professions do. Instead, my profession has been singled out and laws passed that artificially lower my potential salary.

      Heck if I know what I'm really worth, there are many factors, but I sure would have liked the opportunity to find out.

    35. Re:Payback's a bitch by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

      You're right. Let's terminate the H1B program and simply have an open immigration policy.

      I see some practical problems with this approach, but if it was applied evenly I could accept it.
      I believe other professions might not see it this way.

      It would be intriguing to see the backlash from the general public once they discovered that most blue-collar jobs were going to disappear overnight. I doubt they would sit still for it. Why should I? It is happening to my profession now, albeit on a smaller, more-limited scale.

    36. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So now objecting to my job moving overseas is racist?
      I thought the CEOs of all these big companies would have taught you about capitalism by now.

      You have no right to object to losing your job. It's just the market forces at work. And if the market forces say you lose your job, your house, and you starve to death, you have no choice but to accept it happily.
    37. Re:Payback's a bitch by Bruce+Allen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Senior Frac

      There are "H-1Bs for lawyers". H-1Bs are for any "speciality occupation" - the US Government site (the first response you get if you Google "h-1b") has the official government definition:

      A specialty occupation requires theoretical and practical application of a body of specialized knowledge along with at least a bachelor's degree or its equivalent. For example, architecture, engineering, mathematics, physical sciences, social sciences, medicine and health, education, business specialties, accounting, law, theology, and the arts are specialty occupations.

      So, if you kill the H-1B, you are basically preventing educated foreigners in all of these fields from entering the country to work. Of course, American lawyers, doctors, architects, etc are somewhat protected by the idiosyncrasies of American law, medical practice and building codes. Programming languages and software design methodologies are a worldwide standard. Bear in mind that it goes both ways, though - American programmers can work in europe tomorrow if they wanted to, but American lawyers would have to learn the legal system first.

      At home, compared to an H-1B worker, you have immense advantages - the ability to freelance without an agency (H-1Bs cannot take on freelance gigs at will, they have to do it through a contracting company or else pay a visa transfer fee for each company they want to work at), plus the ability to start your own company. What are you waiting for? Outcompete!

      In reference to your parent post, if the immigrant IT workers had to "jump through the same hoops the immigrant physical laborers do", then they wouldn't come to America. They would either stay in their own countries and start companies, or move to another competing country with a less Draconian immigration policy. If America shuts its doors to talented, hard-working immigrants, the top immigrants will just go to European countries instead. I know a very bright, hard-working programmer who can't take his US job until October (due to H-1B quota being reached), so he took a job in England until then. His American company still wants him so much that they are prepared to wait until October for him. So, what happens in the meanwhile? Uncle Sam loses out on a couple months' taxes on his $80,000+ income and my friend helps the English company expand, outperform American companies and create more jobs in England.

      Of course, I hold an H-1B, so I am biased. I do know, though, that I have helped my company expand and hire more American workers. I don't think we are directly competing though - I am a music video director.

      Bruce Allen

    38. Re:Payback's a bitch by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...like?

      Like India won't give you a work visa. Several Americans have tried and been denied.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    39. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto - extremely well said. I remember the early days of my layoff on the HotJobs discussion boards - Indians would come on and inform us that we Americans deserved to lose our jobs because we were lazy, wanted too much money, lived too high-flying as to lifestyle, and were incompetent. Moreover, our English was bad, and they were simply taking over the jobs that were rightfully theirs. I saw us refered to as 'the genetic vomit of Europe' on a moderated Indian discussion board, and claims were constantly made that us Americans knew nothing about technology, that the US owed our technological preeminence solely to Indian talent and that we would 'go to the dogs' without India (this said as the H-1b quota was about to sunset back to a lower level). "We're cheaper and we're better." one of their leaders said. The passage of time has tested that equation.

    40. Re:Payback's a bitch by deltacephei · · Score: 1

      I don't think we want to tie tech career salaries so closely to something like the stock market which hinges on perception of value and investor emotion. Rather, how did lawyers and doctors build up their overpaid status? Have you or any of us ever worked with a lawyer or doctor and come away saying, "Wow, I sure received good value for my $6000"? I can possibly make the argument for specialists where only a few suppliers are available and the stakes are higher - say a brain or heart surgeon - I can't make the argument for any form of law interpreters though. There are many examples of professions earning salaries that don't seem commiserate with training, ability or value to society, for instance, how is it housing developers make millions producing cheap junk while holding hands with city politicians? You probably have four times the IQ of an average house developer, yet Joe Sunland Estates is driving the Lexus.

    41. Re:Payback's a bitch by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "You can outsource manufacturing and low-skill/low-interaction jobs. But any job that requires communication and significant interaction with the customer (yes, including call centers) is not something that's going to work in an outsourced environment over the long-term. And we're starting to see the pullback I was predicting long ago."

      I mainly agree with this, due to experience myself.

      The software life-cycle is a constantly evolving, cyclic process that require design, implementation, testing, etc over and over. Requirements constantly change in the subtlest ways but every little detail is important.

      In manufacturing, a monolithic design is put into a machine and someone operates it, pumping out the same thing over and over.

      In software every piece is unique and usually interacts within a larger system.

      My company tried a little outsourcing and it was very late and of very poor quality. It was just not worth the time to try and convey every detail of what was needed, how current fun functionality works, etc because this is what developers are paid to figure out and document.

      Outsourcing works in a software engineering course where everything is perfect. In the real world, it doesn't.

      Business people don't understand that software is not anything like manufacturing. They thought it was and could be easily moved but it really cannot. It's a difficult process with so many hurdles in the simplest project and since there is no official or real method of software development (mainly ad hoc) there is no common language to design things and implements them.

      I don't think there ever will because every project I've ever worked on is so unique.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    42. Re:Payback's a bitch by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      " Employers want to make a profit and they will always go with what is cheaper. But on the flip side, as India's economy gets stronger, it will not be so cheap anymore. And then the outsourcing will go to a different place."

      You're subtly wrong here. A business will not always go for what's *cheaper*, but what's more *profitable*.

      Many businesses are finding outsourcing may be cheaper but it isn't more profitable because of many factors, including:

      Costs usually balloon far past what was estimated due to communication complications, poor quality and the resultant bug fixing which is very expensive.

      It was thought that software development was like manufacturing which it is not. Software development works better when people work together with the business people. It works better when the developers handle many facets of the companies product beyond just software as it creates an understanding of the entire complex system. Manufacturing is pumping out the same thing over and over. It's simple.

      One thing that bothers me, especially with Indian programmers, is you don't see much of their work in the open source community. This implies to me it is made up of a lot of people who don't care much for technology and are doing it for the money right now. I know I work with people like this and their poor quality work shows.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    43. Re:Payback's a bitch by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

      Rather, how did lawyers and doctors build up their overpaid status?

      They created a monopoly by requiring [justifiably] strict licensure to practice their craft in the U.S. The AMA and the bar, I would suppose? The would probably be a good technique for engineers. I can't imagine it would be easy to do until tech worker unionize and require licensure for entry.

    44. Re:Payback's a bitch by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      See, companies exist to make money. There's no more or less to it than that.

      See, companies operate in a country, and it's in the interest of that country to protect its workforce. That means that when a significant portion of jobs are exported abroad, it should be examined for its impact on the national level and possibly discouraged.

      But, if you let some foreign programmer best you in a cost/benefits analysis, your job is toast.

      Simple short term profit motive will result in bankruptcy, as the foreign programmer gains experience that he uses in his market, not ours. After a while, it becomes difficult to hire anyone locally and the wages of that foreign programmer have risen dramatically. Some cost savings, right?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    45. Re:Payback's a bitch by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Great comment, well written.

      Outsourcing is not a hose that funnels jobs to India - it points to the cheapest or best source of labour. Today, that means India. Tomorrow it'll mean Vietnam, Russia or China. The day after it might be Nigeria.

      Anyone working in an outsourced role is living on borrowed time. The company has already shown at least once that it didn't mind dumping the old workers for new, cheaper workers. As soon as they find cheaper ones in a relatively stable country, they'll dump the current workers.

      This is the IT workforce today - no security, no loyalty and no promises.

    46. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thank god the racist prick is out on the street where he belongs."

      YOU are the moron and the bigot. I would block your IP if I could. You're the first to cry racism and yet you're racist against Americans.

    47. Re:Payback's a bitch by jax9999 · · Score: 1

      I hear that a lot whenever anyone complains about Indian quality they are labelled racist. Usually by the Indians trying to explain any objections.

    48. Re:Payback's a bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's deal with the Indian labor problem the way India deals with its competition problems: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/15 25535.cms

      So, we impose a penalty on India for labor dumping.

  4. Damn conservative society... by one-eye-johnson · · Score: 5, Funny

    India and Apple obviously haven't been properly educated about the dangers of pulling out.

    1. Re:Damn conservative society... by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, at least their severance packages were nicer than John Wayne Bobbitt's.

      --
      The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
    2. Re:Damn conservative society... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck the damn indians, they can't program for shit - just a bunch of over rated idiots

  5. Oblig. Blues Brothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India: What do you want for nothing? A rubber biscuit?
    Apple: Bow, bow, ooo-oo-ooo-ooommm...

  6. $40 by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Two months severance pay in India = about $42 and 7 cents

    1. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Two months severance pay in India = about $42 and 7 cents


      No.

      I am a developer in India. All my college buddies are too. Not one of us gets less than $800 per month. And that's the 'entry level' for our number of years(3) in the industry.
    2. Re:$40 by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      More like $1166.00. (source: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/printable/india2 _info_print.html). Still not that much when you think about it. Hopefully companies will stop trying to take advantage of people and pay them what they are worth (I know this is unrealistic). A job is worth $x, then they shouldn't think of how to take advantage of someone to save a little extra. I just wish everyone was a little less focused on maximizing profit.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    3. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, the crack-addicted welfare leaches around here make more than that just sitting on their ass and cashing my tax checks.

    4. Re:$40 by jrockway · · Score: 1

      This was modded insightful, so I have to ask -- is that true? If so, why is everything so expensive over here? If someone can live for two months on $40, why not have Wal-Mart buy what someone lives on for two months, ship it over here, and sell it for $80? That's a lot less than what people are paying now.

      --
      My other car is first.
    5. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just about enough to pay for your mother for a night, I hear.

    6. Re:$40 by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Four score and 7 cents ago, our fore-Apple pulled out...

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    7. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If someone can live for two months on $40, why not have Wal-Mart buy what someone lives on for two months, ship it over here, and sell it for $80?"

      Because they can ship it over here and sell it for $800 . Thats why.

    8. Re:$40 by samkass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was meant as humor, and you kind of proved his point. $800/mo would be considered poverty here in the United States-- low enough that if you were a citizen you'd be paying "negative" income taxes on it and getting a couple hundred dollars back from the government each year. And my guess is the folks who answer phones for tech support lines get paid a lot less than that.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    9. Re:$40 by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Not one of us gets less than $800 per month.

      So you get $800/month (or a bit more). What does that buy?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:$40 by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1
      No.

      I am a developer in India. All my college buddies are too. Not one of us gets less than $800 per month. And that's the 'entry level' for our number of years(3) in the industry.

      Really? Wow. As a co-op (that is, not yet graduated from University, but working full time for a block of 4 months in place of school, I do a year's worth before graduating) in Canada, I'm making $732... per week.

    11. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hopefully companies will stop trying to take advantage of people and pay them what they are worth


      If the point you are trying to make is that people in India are somehow being short changed, you are well off the mark. They are compensated quite well for their jobs. Yes, they get paid fewer dollars than their American or British couterparts. But those fewer dollars buys more things in India than it does in the US. It's not like they're paying $800 a month and these people are living on the streets starving. That $800/month buys a decent lifestyle. To the point where some recent US grads are moving to India to take up tech jobs.


      On another note, anyone want to start an outsourcing company in Mongolia with me? We can get in on the ground floor and be much cheaper than the current outsource call centers. Just a thought.

    12. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Wow. As a co-op (that is, not yet graduated from University, but working full time for a block of 4 months in place of school, I do a year's worth before graduating) in Canada, I'm making $732... per week.

      So you've got rent and gas covered. How do you eat?
      (JKOS)

    13. Re:$40 by hazem · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that your $732/week, particularly after taxes, buys a lot less than the Indian fellow's $800/month.

    14. Re:$40 by Photar · · Score: 1

      Bus drivers in the US make $3200 a month.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    15. Re:$40 by grolschie · · Score: 1
      So you get $800/month (or a bit more). What does that buy?
      A mountain of beef vindaloo, rice, rotis, naans & poppadoms! And lashings of Kingfisher beer! Mmmm.... beer.
    16. Re:$40 by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Okay, good on the kingfisher, but I'm looking for some equivalence between $800 in india and something like $3000 in seattle, wa.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:$40 by jlarocco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, before you brag too much, you might want to check this out.

      $800 a month in India is more than 3 times more than the income of an average person in India.

      $732 a week is only 20% higher than the average Canadian. So imagine making 3 times more than you do right now, and you'll have some idea of how well that guy's doing in India.

      That's why outsourcing is so popular. In theory, companies can hire 4 people in India for the cost of one co-op student here. And to top it off, all 4 of the Indians will be living like kings.

    18. Re:$40 by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      Just for comparison's sake. Minimum wage in the Philippines is a shade over US$6.15 a day, about US$135 a month. For fresh college graduates, entry-level IT jobs will pay between US$227 and US$379. US$800 is considered high -- junior- to mid- management-level.

      All these figues are based on the current exchange rate, which according to Google is: US$ 1 = 52.8130892 Philippine pesos.

    19. Re:$40 by foo12 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And even "American-standard" cost-of-living is drug down by the lower wage base. I remember seeing luxury condos in the Greenbelt being priced in the low-$30s. In any US market, the same unit would have gone for 10x that.

    20. Re:$40 by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Ever considered academia? :-)

    21. Re:$40 by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


      But in India, at $800/month you can probably afford a full time servant who will take care of your laundry and ironing, your cooking, your shopping, your errands, etc.

      (This isn't because $800/month is big money in India, it's because there is a vast supply of cheap labor available for such service jobs.)

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    22. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit until you use a username.

    23. Re:$40 by sitruc37diesel · · Score: 1

      I'm an American. I took an internship in India because I thought it would be interesting, which it was.

      I was paid 6000 rupees per month, or about $140. Some of my coworkers made 5000/month, one of my roommates made 5000/month as a programmer, a guy selling shirts outside a grocery store also made 5000/month. My graphic designer roommate made 30000/month.

      And no, I had a hard time living on that money even there. One time I got my 6000 rupees to last me 3 weeks, but that was a stretch.

    24. Re:$40 by kirk__243 · · Score: 1

      The job is only 'worth' what the employer sees fit to pay. I might be the best bricklayer in the world, but if no one wants any bricks laid then I'm not worth an awful lot.

    25. Re:$40 by Alioth · · Score: 1

      But the US bus driver's cost of living (housing, fuel, food etc.) probably eats most of that, particularly if he lives somewhere like San Fransisco (in which case, he probably can't support himself on that wage and needs to be a DINKY).

      The Indian's $800/month on the other hand is enough to live like a king - because the basic cost of living is a tiny fraction of what it is in the United States.

    26. Re:$40 by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1
      I would imagine that your $732/week, particularly after taxes, buys a lot less than the Indian fellow's $800/month.

      Maybe, what's the cost of living like in India?

      I looked up the cost of a new Honda Accord here and there, here it's about 18,225 USD*, which is about $20,000, there it's about 15,42,000 Rs, which apparently translates to $37,143.

      I also looked at housing costs in Ottawa vs Goa. The average cost of a house in Ottawa is $219,713, while the average cost of a house in Goa appears to be around 55,000 pounds, which is around $113,853.

      Finally, I looked at food costs. Various fine dining restaurants here would cost about $50 on average for two people, there it's about 1200 Rs, which is about $29.

      Overall, it doesn't appear that $800 in India buys more than $2900 in Canada. If anything, it buys quite a bit less, even if that's 10x the minimum wage compared to only ~2.5x.

      * honda.ca uses Flash, and nobody in their right mind would ever install Flash.

    27. Re:$40 by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Foreigner living in the Philippines, splitting hairs I know, the average wage is a little lower than that - between 7 and 9 thousand peso per month, around US $150 - entry level IT jobs pay basic, mid-level management pays a couple of thousand peso more. Most management positions of any type earn between (Php) 15 and 25 thousand. There is huge wealth in this country, hanging around places like ortigas you'll have to dodge the BMW's and Mercs when crossing the street.

      There is much poverty here as well, though most people have live-in house maids (domestic slaves basically) regardless of income range.

      Kind of back on topic - there are massive numbers of call centers here for US based industry - Americans mostly never know since the filipino english accent = US. I'd say it's not that companies are pulling out of India and going home, just moving their operations to countries where you can't tell the difference.

    28. Re:$40 by vasanth · · Score: 1

      looks like you were taken for a ride.... talk abt cheap labour from Ammerica

    29. Re:$40 by luisdom · · Score: 1

      After taxes?
      I got the same in Spain! -in a small city, but...-
      I thought India was cheap...

    30. Re:$40 by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, except that you can buy a smaller car for ~ 8000 USD. Smaller cars are bett suited to crowded roads. And there is some public transport available, so you can do fine without a car.

      Goa is a beach resort state. Not a city. Not exactly comparable. Compare per square foot rates, and then see.

      Anyway, in Bangalore (which is far more expensive), for 800 USD, you can afford to buy a house in a year (with ~ 80% as a loan, of course). You can also afford a maid to do your cleaning.

      Fine dining is ~ 4 USD for two, or if you go really expensive 15 USD. A movie is 4 USD + snacks for two (20 USD is 3 - 4 star hotels).

      Travelling in Bangalore is expensive, about 4 USD/day if you go by car, about 0.50 USD by bus.

      On my last trip to Goa, we spent ~ 300 INR (6 USD)/person on food over two days. Fresh sea food each time.

      If you are in Mumbai, land is slightly more expensive, but the actual cost of living is far, far lower if you live in the suburbs). A years worth of travel is ~ 300 USD, and you don't need a car at all. Fine dining is about the same cost as Bangalore, unless you go to a hotel aimed at serving tourists.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    31. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $800 a month in India is more than 3 times more than the income of an average person in India.

      And why exactly would a skilled software engineer want to get paid an average wage, which is probably pulled down significantly by a large number of unskilled workers and farmers?

    32. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I am a developer in India. All my college buddies are too. Not one of us gets less than $800 per month. And that's the 'entry level' for our number of years(3) in the industry.

      So, enjoy it while it lasts, because the "industry" will collapse.

      Beeing dirt cheap was the only advantage India outsourcing had. As it was dirt cheap, it looked good on excel spreadsheet, so it looked good for analysts, so the market value of companies doing it was going up, so everyone was doing it, EVEN WHEN THEY KNEW IT WASN'T WORTH IT.

      Yep. Read last sentence again. Most of us knew that it wasn't worth it. I personally managed 3 outsourcing projects (each of two dozen heads). The consensus among me and my two upper levels of management was that it wasn't worth it. We had to keep heads onshore to:
      * Train people form BLR
      * Micro-manage them to an amazing level of details
      * Fix the problem they made
      * Make the most crucial parts of the work
      Each time, those heads would have been able to do the job themselves. But it wouldn't have looked as good for Wall Street.

      Those projects were 'sucessfull', ie: the whole team delivered. Truth is that the onsite team did all the hard work.

      Other business units of the same company made bigger BLR operations (200 heads). Those business units fired their local workforce, failed to deliver, don't exist anymore.

      I'm just waiting for the upcoming kind of posts on the tech lists:

      "Hi my name is Amulya, and I am a very experienced software engineer. I have worked in two dozen of western companies in India over the last 4 years, on several products that never saw the light of day, but it is not a problem, because I left for a better job each time, but now it looks that I can't do that anymore because the companies now want people that can actually deliver(sp?) something.

      Please advice."

      I am not saying that all Indian workers were all hacks, but the tech level was much much much lower than anything we had here.

      So, yeah, enjoy it while the "indian software industry" scam lasts...

    33. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      skilled software engineer? they go by a freakin training manual.b esides, they call everyone there engineers.
      hell, every time i get gas i see an indian petroleum transfer engineer.

    34. Re:$40 by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      The point is, that they *used* to pay a whole lot more for the job, and were still profitable. I haven't noticed a decrease in the price of software have you? If they are only paying 1/10th the amount to actually get the job done, then why are software prices still increasing? Greed.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    35. Re:$40 by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you've got it backwards. Have you been to India? Lower-class Indians live in filth and poverty. The $800/mo. Indian programmer's lifestyle is still not very good. They can't afford a decent car, but everyone else is riding about in a moped or on foot. This programmer's housing is what we would consider middle-class; the lower classes live in shacks, or worse, tents or even huts.

      --
      Not Found
      The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
    36. Re:$40 by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Well, if you really decide to save money, you could make by on 120 USD/mth. I know, I used to live on that (and half that money went to pay for my postgraduate diploma course).

      What kind of savings do you have in Spain?

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    37. Re:$40 by samkass · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe this was the "$40" replier's point.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    38. Re:$40 by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      the lower classes live in shacks, or worse, tents or even huts.

      Cool! I cant wait until outsourcing helps us catch up!

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    39. Re:$40 by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

      Why do you seem to think a "decent car" is a sign of wealth? Where I live, the only people who need cars are the ones who can't afford to live in the city center.

    40. Re:$40 by hazem · · Score: 1

      My coworker from India always gives the rest of us grief in the office whenever the cost of education comes up (we all have MBAs).

      His bachelors degree cost him a total of $400 in India. And while you might say that it wasn't a good education, or comparable to a BS in the US, he got his MBA from Wharton - where he was accepted with his degree from India and graduated in the top 5% of his class.

    41. Re:$40 by dem3tre · · Score: 1

      Working for a company that operates a unit in Manila, and having been involved in some of the hiring aspects there, I can say that for us $800/month was on the low end for new hires coming to us with previous work-related experience.

    42. Re:$40 by luisdom · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by savings?
      Here, in my small -80k- town, you could live on ~450 (sharing a cheap apartment, no car, etc.)
      I earned 800 working as a junior programmer in a nearby city, but senior programmers, db managers, etc., with 6 years experience, earn as low as 1000, lately; things are not very well in IT, in our region...

    43. Re:$40 by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I looked up the cost of a new Honda Accord here and there, here it's about 18,225 USD*, which is about $20,000, there it's about 15,42,000 Rs, which apparently translates to $37,143.

      A car is not something you buy every day. Amortize the cost over the lifespan of the car and it will not end up being such a significant contributor to your cost of living. Or buy a Maruti!

      I also looked at housing costs in Ottawa vs Goa. The average cost of a house in Ottawa is $219,713, while the average cost of a house in Goa appears to be around 55,000 pounds, which is around $113,853.

      I don't know how you came up with the "average" cost of a house in Goa, but it is nowhere near that high. And Goa has a lot of foreigners bidding up prices; it's not typical.

      Finally, I looked at food costs. Various fine dining restaurants here would cost about $50 on average for two people, there it's about 1200 Rs, which is about $29.

      Rs1200 is a LOT for a meal. More interesting is the cost of meals you are likely to eat on a regular basis. You can easily eat out for US$0.50 at a basic place.

      Overall, it doesn't appear that $800 in India buys more than $2900 in Canada. If anything, it buys quite a bit less

      You are making the mistake of comparing identical goods based on what is commonplace and cost-effective where you come from. This is not a way of estimating cost of living, it's a way of estimating the cost of replicating Canada in India.

      An Indian who did the same thing in Canada would be doubly shocked by the price. How much would Canadians spend for a live-in maid and cook? For authentic Indian food? For weekend road trips to tropical beaches? To have fresh coconuts delivered to your door each morning?To see elephants in the wild?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    44. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a coder living in the USA. I guess I'm ashamed of the string of replies to this post. It's amazing how glibly my peers can read this and respond "You piece of shit, you only make $800/mo... you're an idiot to think that's anything -- I make x more than you and that means I'm worth x times as much as you are as a human being."

      Think about this? Yes, I make more in a couple days than this guy gets paid in a month, but does that mean I'm x times better than he is? Does that mean I'm smarter? No, it means that I was born in a different part of the world (I'm actually from Eastern Europe but moved to the USA as a kid) where there is more money and people are paid more. And people from the part of the world where I live have been exploiting people from your part of the world for centuries.

      That alone is sad, but the fact that some assholes on /. just instinctively read this
      post and jumped all over it to say "$800/month is worthless. I can piss and shit on $800/month" -- that is disgraceful. You should be ashamed.

    45. Re:$40 by dodobh · · Score: 1

      In an 80K town, you could live comfortably on ~ 60 USD/mth. My 120 USD was in a 3 million pop. city. Bangalore is about 8 million pop. and you can live comfortably here on 300 USD/mth. You certainly don't need to share an apartment, though if you want a car, a couple of hundred USD more per month will get you one (I could afford a car, but I have no desire to lower my standard of living -- IMO, in a civilised city, public mass transit is always better than a car).

      Savings == percentage of income saved.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    46. Re:$40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My reaction was the opposite of "wow, I make a lot more than that, you must be a schlob".

      My reaction was "holy shit", there's NO way I can compete with that. And also, "I hope my boss doesn't find out".

    47. Re:$40 by sitruc37diesel · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say I got taken for a ride... I just got paid a local salary, in which there is a lot of variation. Internships in India, I'm told, are often unpaid, so the fact that I made more than some of my coworkers who were permanent employees tells me it was fair.

      The company did tell me it would be quite impractical for me, but it was the only internhip offer I got so I took it. It was definitely a great cultural experience to live in Pune for 6 months.

    48. Re:$40 by Photar · · Score: 1

      He may live like a king when compared to other Indians. But I don't care how cheap stuff in India is you're not driving a Bently on $800 a year.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    49. Re:$40 by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I just read an interesting book about life in Mumbai, called "Maximum City". One of the things the guy who wrote it mentioned is that when he moved (back) to Mumbai after having been gone for ten years, he rented an apartment for $5000/month, with a $200,000 deposit. It took him three months after getting the apartment before he had water, power, and gas, and even then, neither the water nor the power were anywhere like 24/7. Now, he got a reasonably good apartment for that money, compared to the hundreds of people who were living in tents and illegal buildings (that were regularly knocked down by the government) that were all around his apartment building, but still: you'd have to make quite a bit of money to live like a king in the most populated city in India.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  7. 30 people by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The company had commenced operations in April and hired about 30 people for its subsidiary

    In Silicon Valley, a one cough by a hiring manager can cause 30 people to disappear overnight. Thirty people in India represented less than a million dollars worth of pocket change to Apple. The story in really, "What were they attempting to do in the first place?"

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:30 people by harrkev · · Score: 2, Funny
      In Silicon Valley, a one cough by a hiring manager can cause 30 people to disappear overnight.
      Is the hiring manager's name "Big Tony?"
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:30 people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Silicon Valley, a one cough by a hiring manager can cause 30 people to disappear overnight.

      What happens when he flaps his wings?

    3. Re:30 people by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Apple didn't know that to do business in India, it is necessary to grease palms to get anything done.

      Take that fact and consider the paranoia over compliance with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley regarding white color corruption and it is pretty easy to see why Apple would have second thoughts.

      The only things certain in life are death, taxes and the unintended consequences of government regulation.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  8. we were wondering too-Were's the beef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Meanwhile CEOs and other execs reap massive rewards, usually with little relationship to how well their company does because of these decisions."

    So in keeping with slash-groupthink, Jobs and company just got a massive reward from this manouver. Right?

  9. Irony by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I first viewed the comments on this article, the quote at the bottom of the page was this:

    The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. -- Churchill

    Do you figure that since socialism has gone bust, capitalism has had to take over the sharing of the misery?

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Do you figure that since socialism has gone bust, capitalism has had to take over the sharing of the misery?"

      WTF? You mean communism not socialism. The US is not a pure capitalist economy. It has socialist leanings which is why there are public schools, Social Security, Welfare and Medicare. I hear that europe is more heavily tilted towards socialism - especially France.

    2. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      socialism's gone bust? when did that happen? *looks around* oooh, you mean socialism has gone bust in countries that never had it to begin with... Iiii get it....

    3. Re:Irony by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      I don't quite know if socialism has ever really been given a chance on a macro scale. Although nations like China, Cuba, the former USSR, etc get labeled as "socialist" and or "communist," they've been totalitarian dictatorships and have not really adhered to Marx's model.

      One could argue that many socialist and communist societies have existed over the course of history, yet they have tended to center around small community structures (ie certain tribal societies). But, of course, those are usually plowed over by expanding capitalist nations.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    4. Re:Irony by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1
      Cuba's a unique place too in that the hugely powerful country right next to it is embargoing the entire island, and effectively dragging other countries into the fray by not letting trading vessels that have stopped at Cuba also stop at the US. When considering your trading partners, most countries opt for the US trade in terms of maximizing profits.

      In spite of all this, Cuba has done remarkably well, and is in much better shape than most third-world countries. It also greatly exceeds the US in terms of infant mortality, has the highest literacy rate in Latin America, has twice as many doctors per capita as the US, etc.

      Yeah, I know off-topic, but I take any chance I can get to shed some light on this unique nation that most Americans don't know anything about.

    5. Re:Irony by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 0

      Sigh... I'm not the one who doesn't get it here. First of all, I was just trying to point out the irony of having that particular quote at the bottom of the page of that particular article and maybe let someone have a little chuckle over it. Second, when Churchill said "socialism", he was talking about what Americans would call "communism." Yeah, you could argue for days about whether they're the same thing but it would be a waste of time. Come on, you guys--lighten up a bit!

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    6. Re:Irony by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      You snuck one rather BAD thing in your list of things that are good about Cuba - Infant mortality is a Bad Thing.

      That said, after seeing Yank Tanks - I am amazed at the resourcefulness of some of Cuba's citizens. If the US had auto mechanics as competent as the Cubans, our auto industry would go out of business because cars would last so damn long. :)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    7. Re:Irony by harmanjd · · Score: 1

      And hey, if we really wanted to get rid of Castro we would have lifted the embargo a LONG time ago and let American "culture" do them in.

      Don't listen to me - I am just another idiot posting on /.

    8. Re:Irony by kirk__243 · · Score: 1
      You might've missed the point here. India has the misery - and whoever will be getting those jobs won't be sharing that misery. The guys who are getting paid a lot of money to make such decisions aren't sharing in the misery, either.

      Churchill meant that socialism does allow for sharing everything, but you'll have much more misery than blessings when things are shared. Capitalism gives much more net benefit, and definitely doesn't share the misery.

    9. Re:Irony by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      You snuck one rather BAD thing in your list of things that are good about Cuba - Infant mortality is a Bad Thing.

      GP meant it the other way round.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/12/opinion/12kris.h tml?ex=1263272400&en=c7ea472ff9651976&ei=5090

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  10. Sounds pretty harsh to me by coupland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "On May 15, Apple officials addressed us and were highly appreciative of the workforce and the task it would execute in India. I wonder why they never said anything even then," said another fired employee.

    Seems pretty cold to me. In a lot of developing countries like this a job at a major multinational serves to support not just the family but the entire extended family. No doubt some of these people even had to quit other jobs to join Apple, and can't return. I worked many years for the international division of a large multinational and saw first-hand the culture of abusing foreign workers because management knew they could work them 14 hours a day and the people couldn't say or do anything about it. And since these people are all classified as "professionals" no one can swoop into the factory to blow the whistle, you have to work whatever overtime is demanded of you, for free. Pretty crummy if you ask me.

    1. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's called labour laws.

      If India had any sort of self-respect they'd invest in them.

      In Canada and the states we had to fight hard for decent working conditions. If they're just pussies and don't want to rock the boat they'll never get any better.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by coupland · · Score: 1

      No, it's not just labour laws, it's also corporate citizenship. Apple as a company should show more respect for their employees, be they in North America, India, or anywhere else. If this was a company making calendars for sale at the Dollar Store I would understand it, but it's Apple.

    3. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 1
      It's called labour laws.

      If India had any sort of self-respect they'd invest in them.

      In Canada and the states we had to fight hard for decent working conditions. If they're just pussies and don't want to rock the boat they'll never get any better.


      *cough* are you a software engineer in the US or Canada? *ahem*
      --
      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    4. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      You seem out of touch... Bangalore is one of the main outsourcing centers, and the environemt there is like Silicon valley to the extent of the frequency people switch jobs. Hire someone and then two weeks later they quit with a better offer. This is one of the problems many company's experimenting with outsourcing are having - the super high turnover.

      If you want to feel sorry for anyone, feel sorry for the American developer trying to pay for an American cost living while competing for his job at Indian salaries.

    5. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now, in Canada, we can't do anything at all if the labour unions don't want us to. Progress eh?

    6. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as the cost of doing business goes beyond a certain level, companies are going to outsource to China or someplace else instead. What needs to happen is for all the countries with a sizeable skilled labour force to agree to the same set of protections. And I don't think China would be willing to partake in that.

    7. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by wkcole · · Score: 1

      It is clear that you're speaking of Canada, maybe. Not the US. Aside from the tiny minority of US workers represented by unions, most of us could only dream to have the sort of generous treatment Apple provided to its Indian workers. 2 months severence? Sweet. When I was part of a "reduction in force" in 2001 there was absolutely nothing illegal about the fact that we had no notice and no severence. Most US workers are "at will" and our tenure of employment is not covered by any law at all.

    8. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by dsanfte · · Score: 0

      So buy some cheap land and go farm it. Be self-sufficient. Nobody is forcing you to buy-in to the American capitalist dream, only yourself. "It's not realistic"? Yeah right. Only because you discount it as a possibility from the get-go.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    9. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not really. I'm a software guy in Bangalore, and given the current scene I'm sure any of the fired employees will find a job at another top MNC in less than a week.

      Intel, HP, MS, Google, Oracle, AMD, Philips, Samsung, Nokia, Rambus, Toshiba, IBM, Accenture and many others are all here within a radius of 10 kilometers. And that's without even counting the home-grown services majors like Infosys, TCS and Wipro. Any half decent software guy can find a good job in Bangalore in less than a week. It's not uncommon for people to have five or more offers to choose from when making a switch. And salaries have pretty much doubled in the last one year.

      Overall, I'd say it's not a bad time to be here...

    10. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by coupland · · Score: 1

      So buy some cheap land and go farm it. Be self-sufficient. Nobody is forcing you to buy-in to the American capitalist dream, only yourself. "It's not realistic"? Yeah right. Only because you discount it as a possibility from the get-go.

      Hunh? Did you just have a two-way argument all alone???

    11. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you must never have had to pay property taxes. When the feds and states take all the income money and share only a small amount of the sales tax, property taxes are the only source of income for unimportant things like education. Even if you could "live off the land", you still need some flow to pay for those taxes. Death and taxes.

    12. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Apple as a company should show more respect for their employees, be they in North America, India, or anywhere else.

      3 months is often within the probationary period for a new hire, especially new hires who need training. These are not people who have made great sacrifices for the company. They may have taken a risk in leaving the prior job, but that was taking a risk in their own interest, not out of charity for Apple.

      They worked 3 months, they get 2 months' severance which will basically be free money for most of them because they should be able to find jobs quickly. That's even better than most Americans would get, and most Americans in that situation probably wouldn't be eligible for unemployment benefits after such a short employment period.

      Frankly, that's about as good as it gets.

      Giving them more notice would be rather pointless, considering the 2 months of severance and the fact that they were probably still coming up to speed on things. These are not people who have built up a body of work at Apple, they aren't key people in the middle of big development projects requiring a lot of knowledge transfer before they leave Apple.

      Apple clearly wouldn't have any work for them to do, and there'd be little point spending more time learning the details of their jobs at Apple, so it'd be wasting everyone's time if they kept coming to work at Apple. Far better that they use their two months' pay to network and job-hunt full-time, or get a job ASAP and invest the two months' pay. (This may be even more pronounced as Apple employees than it would be if it were another tech company, because the things they've been learning for their jobs at Apple are less likely to be transferable to other jobs at other companies.)

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    13. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by DrWho520 · · Score: 1

      In a lot of developing countries like this a job at a major multinational serves to support not just the family but the entire extended family.

      The stereotypical tech geek notwithstanding, I hope you are putting an Indian's extended family at higher importance than an American's family who has been outsourced because of sheer numbers. Of course, you probably do not consider what a son/daughter pays for a nursing home for his parents and in-laws. To hell with the sarcasm, I think it is disgusting to think Indians loosing their jobs and not being able to support their family is any more tragic than Americans in the same situation. (FYI, I am using American in place of United States Citizen because I enjoy the way it rolls off the tongue.)

      No doubt some of these people even had to quit other jobs to join Apple, and can't return.

      As opposed to having a job taken away because of cost of living difference? And then trying to find a job in a market glutted with workers whose jobs were similarly taken away? Something tells me the non-American (Indian in this case) worker will have a much better time of it.

      ...abusing foreign workers because management knew they could work them 14 hours a day and the people couldn't say or do anything about it. ...you have to work whatever overtime is demanded of you, for free.

      It is called unpaid overtime and it happens when a program plan underestimates the labor reqired, the time required or the difficulty of the problem. It also happens when the spectre of outsourcing is floating over a workers head.

      You say you have worked for the "international division of a large multinational," yet you have a very naive view of American management. You think they take advantage of a worker because they are not American? You think only American management does such things?

      I have worked for an engineering firm for 3 years. A program can be thriving one day, employing 30-40 engineers, and be canceled the next. If an engineer can be placed, wonderful. If an engineer sits on overhead for too long, it is layoff time. We have approved overtime that we can be payed for, but to meet a milestone, keep your job and improve your employment future, you work whatever hours are required. I am lucky. My job has requirements that make it impossible to outsource, but if I were to loose it, I would have to take one that could be outsourced. The spectre is still there.

      The world economy has many pitfalls. They are not all going to occur in the US. The world economy giveth and the world economy taketh away.

      --
      The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
    14. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by fpillet · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that workers in Silicon Valley aren't being slaved to working 14 hours a day? Last time I checked with my friends there, they did that AND work on week-ends.

    15. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Pretty crummy if you ask me.

      Yeah, it's pretty crummy that these people voluntarily work 14 hours a day and support their extended family doing so. Most liberal-minded types would be much happier if they were picking through garbage dumps for edible food.

    16. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      If India had any sort of self-respect they'd invest in them.

      Bootstrapping an economy is a process that takes generations. India will have more stringent labour laws when it can afford them. Presently, India is doing very well and labour conditions are improving.

      If Canada or the states had imposed 21st-century first-world labour conditions during the Industrial revolution, we would now be a lot like eastern Europe.

    17. Re:Sounds pretty harsh to me by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      *cough* are you a software engineer in the US or Canada? *ahem*

      He must be in Canada since Americans don't realize that Canada has software engineers (just lumberjacks and hockey players).

  11. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. When you can't outsource menial jobs, then there is no point in oursourcing. Apple just realized the new workforce was less productive than adding a few new employees to their current operation. Wow!

    Apple (and others), do not outsource if you can't spend a year or two getting the new group "up to speed"! It is called the "learning curve".

    1. Re:Wow by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      As someone who has worked in various levels of management, I've seen the dregs of outsourcing. It always results in some level of reduction of quality, a decrease in customer satisfaction, and only a moderate savings.

      Everything is subject to change over time but right now, the quality of the average American IT worker is far better than those from India.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    2. Re:Wow by pstudent12 · · Score: 0

      So you happily buy foriegn made computers assembled in foreign factories by foreigners ? How's the iPod and powerbooks coming along ? Now why don't you go stab another american worker in the back and go buy another outsourced foreign product ?

    3. Re:Wow by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      I'd rather computers be made here at home. If it were my choice, I'd have it that way. I'm just telling you how it is. (I do tend to buy the more expensive higher quality electronics and computers that have more American made parts and assembly).

      Just because I can't buy an "All American Computer" doesn't mean I am going to turn myself into a big fan of outsourcing.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    4. Re:Wow by softweyr · · Score: 1
      ...the quality of the average American IT worker is far better than those from India.

      I've been involved in a few outsourcing projects now, which have ranged from "disappointing" to "disaster." While I can agree that the quality of the code we received back was universally "not very good," the bigger problems were on our own management side.

      Like most American product companies, where our products are software or have significant software in them, our processes range from bad to nonexistant. Product managers, engineering managers, even the VP of Sales feels free to walk right into engineering cubes and ask for features willy-nilly, and they usually get them. While you can rail this isn't the right way to do software development, it has managed to create a multi-trillion dollar industry and everyone does it.

      Moving to a cheaper offshoring location, or even to one with "better" programmers won't change the failure rate significantly because the failures are built into the process.

  12. Were they in time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope India's not pregnant!

    1. Re:Were they in time? by vistic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What's wrong with Indian Apple babies?

  13. It's harder than you might think by winkydink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only way 30 people could disappear overnight is if that hiring manager is a corporate officer. Speaking as one who has been in the "hiring manager" role in Silicon Valley for quite some time, it's pretty hard to get rid of people, even poor performers. Yes, California is an at-will state. California's courts, however, have proven to be very pro-employee. So, firing somebody in California usually requires lots of documentation.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:It's harder than you might think by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Documentation that can be typed by an HR-assistant co-op summer student?

      The skills requirement for ctrl-x ctrl-z are low

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    2. Re:It's harder than you might think by Briareos · · Score: 1
      Documentation that can be typed by an HR-assistant co-op summer student?

      The skills requirement for ctrl-x ctrl-z are low

      Well, the usefulness of "cut" followed by "undo" might be just about as low...

      np: Radiohead - Bones (The Bends)
      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    3. Re:It's harder than you might think by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      The skills requirement for ctrl-x ctrl-z are low

      Too high for me it seems. What does this operation accomplish?

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    4. Re:It's harder than you might think by novus+ordo · · Score: 1
      It's about the usefulness of ctrl-c. However, he might be a Unix guru in which case it is highly appropriate. Let me demonstrate:

      There are two commands for exiting an Emacs editing session:
      CTRL z Suspend Emacs (suspend-Emacs)
      CTRL x, CTRL c Kill Emacs (save-buffers-kill-Emacs)

      :wq
      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    5. Re:It's harder than you might think by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Hmm...that scruffy beard... those suspenders..
      that smug expression... the low Slashdot ID number... You're one of those condescending UNIX users, aren't you!! (No need to give me that nickel - I do have a real computer.)

      But in case you aren't a smug UNIX user, or are and happen to care, CTRL-x cuts highlighted text in any MSFT window and CTRL-z is "undo".

      CTRL-c is cut, CTRL-v is paste (mnemonic: v is upside-down caret). CTRL-a is "select-all", CTRL-s is save. They are all in the lower left of the keyboard and quickly become reflex actions. These work in all windows, with rare exceptions. Notably, they almost always work in Windows file dialog boxes.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    6. Re:It's harder than you might think by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood. Although I am 36 (the horror!), I know perfectly well what those shortcuts do by themselves. My question was what the operation accomplishes. I mean, (1) cut, (2) undo. Now we are back where we started.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    7. Re:It's harder than you might think by bogado · · Score: 1

      Not exactly, the text has been copyed int o the clipboard, witch is out of bound of the 'undo' operation. So this sequence ("ctrl-x ctrl-z") does the same of a simple 'copy' (ctrl-c). :-D

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    8. Re:It's harder than you might think by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I figured as much, but wtf? Am I missing something?

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  14. Comes with selling a lifestyle by teslatug · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's what happens when you sell a lifestyle as opposed to a product. Yuppies don't want to talk to an Indian when they call support about their iPod.

    1. Re:Comes with selling a lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by the low marks Dell's consumer-level support gets, I think it's safe to say nobody wants to talk to an Indian (or anyone who speaks horribly-accented English) when they call support.

  15. Buzzword by Joebert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Indian Giver comes to mind, it's funny, I just haven't figured out how yet. :P

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Buzzword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indian Giver is a racial slur, not funny in any context.

    2. Re:Buzzword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MiiGwetch, Neeji.
      -The Ojibawa Nation

    3. Re:Buzzword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually in this context it is funnier than a motherfucker.
      Not funnier than snakes on a plane, but still pretty damn funny (and there's not a god damn think you can do about it.)

  16. Maybe they realized they made a mistake. by elgee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't throw good money after bad when you get a losing poker hand. Perhaps they realized that their India operation was a mistake. I suspect that the beans will get spilled eventually.

  17. Afraid? by Clazzy · · Score: 3, Funny

    With all this evil alien bacteria invading, perhaps it's a good move for the company?

    --
    If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
    1. Re:Afraid? by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      I bet it will be a new call center near tex/mex border to catch all the ILLEGAL Aliens

      (From the water... See the connection... I guess it was funnier in my head...)

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  18. Pop-ups by Otter · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Those popup ads that the Times of India link is spraying, that aren't blocked by Javascript window suppression in Firefox or Mozilla -- is there a way to get rid of them?

    I've seen them elsewhere (interestingly, always on foreign newspaper sites) but web searches only turn up people complaining about them, only to have jackasses insist that they must be spyware-infected because Firefox is infallible. (As I type this I'm realizing what answer I'm likely to receive, but nonetheless...)

    1. Re:Pop-ups by liangzai · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Two methods:

      1) Safari

      2) www.privoxy.org

    2. Re:Pop-ups by RidiculousPie · · Score: 1

      (presuming you already use adblock plus and filterset.g -- if not then try this)

      try using the noscript extension and whitelisting javascript only for sites that aren't frustrating, or check out userscripts.org to see if the websites in question have greasemonkey scripts to remove the adds. if developing your own script then the firebug extension is invaluable.

      good luck. to an ad-free web.

      RP

      --
      ah, mod points ... now where is my crack?
    3. Re:Pop-ups by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

      Those popup ads that the Times of India link is spraying, that aren't blocked by Javascript window suppression in Firefox or Mozilla -- is there a way to get rid of them?
      I've seen them elsewhere (interestingly, always on foreign newspaper sites) but web searches only turn up people complaining about them, only to have jackasses insist that they must be spyware-infected because Firefox is infallible. (As I type this I'm realizing what answer I'm likely to receive, but nonetheless...)


      The details of negating Firefox's popup blocker are well known, some advertisers use/abuse this some do not yet. But there are definately a growing number of advertisers that are doing just that.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    4. Re:Pop-ups by gozar · · Score: 1

      No pop-ups with Camino under OS X... :-)

      --
      What, me worry?
    5. Re:Pop-ups by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Firefox on OS X. No pop-ups on that site.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    6. Re:Pop-ups by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anything here. I'm currently running Firefox under Windows.

      I do have NoScript installed. That tends to kill a lot of the bother. I have no idea why NoScript isn't part of the standard install. I just won't browse the web without it anymore.

    7. Re:Pop-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have no idea why NoScript isn't part of the standard install."

      Firefox's policy seems, to me (used to be an Opera user) to not put features in the main release. I don't know why.

    8. Re:Pop-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No pop-ups under Opera (ver. 9 Beta)

    9. Re:Pop-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No pop-ups here. Firefix 1.07. Yeah, yeah, I know. Time to upgrade.

    10. Re:Pop-ups by NosTROLLdamus · · Score: 1

      Firefox 1.5.0.2/Linux. No pop-ups.

    11. Re:Pop-ups by Bander · · Score: 1

      Firefox "Bon Echo" 2.0a3, with AdBlock and auto-updated Filterset.G... No pop-ups.

    12. Re:Pop-ups by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Well, since nobody else has said it: Opera. I didn't get a single advertisement or pop-up on that page. No plugins necessary.

    13. Re:Pop-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So to sum it up, you're using the same browser as everyone else, and are therefore a target. Go grab flock or something, the popups will vanish.

    14. Re:Pop-ups by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Marketing mentality, which in wild attempts to get more people to view an ad fails to recognise one simple truth : Someone who has gone out of their way to avoid your advert almost certainly has no intention of buying anything in response to an advert and no amount of advertising will change that.

    15. Re:Pop-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox 1.5.0.4, and no ads. I use AdBlock with Filterset G and Flashblock.

  19. The real reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We have re-evaluated our plans and have decided to put our planned support centre growth in other countries."

    In other words, the US was too expensive and now India is as well. Time to move to an even cheaper place to develop our overpriced products.

    1. Re:The real reason... by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      . . .the US was too expensive and now India is as well. Time to move to an even cheaper place . . .

      Thank God for Mississippi.

      KFG

    2. Re:The real reason... by WrenchPilot · · Score: 1

      the BEST reply!! i don't have to read the rest.

    3. Re:The real reason... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      Thank God for Mississippi.

      I'm not sure God is the one you should be thanking.

  20. Re:if quality count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based upon your grammer, I am assuming English is not your first language.

  21. It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by theolein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Despite the HR blurb at the bottom of TFA claiming the Apple India crowd were doing well and all that, I imagine that it was questions of quality that led to the firing of the workforce. Apple's recent Aperture debacle, where it was discovered that Aperture was majorly inferior to Adobe's Lightbox in performance, features and quality probably resulted in a major shakeup in Apple's software development divisions. There have been a number of stories about companies having problems with outsourced software development, and I presume this is another one. My guess is that Apple will probably either increase the size of its Ireland operations or move the development to eastern Europe where the quality is generally known to be good.

    1. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by Deorus · · Score: 1

      Personally I think it has more to do with the possibility of information leakage than product quality. The case they lost against the Does has probably contributed a lot to this sudden decision.

    2. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by wkcole · · Score: 1

      There's no way Apple could have had any real quality determination yet. They had hired 5% of their 1-year headcount and had not fully trained managers yet.

    3. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by ak3ldama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The company I work for did a test to see if they could outsource a small project and it also failed miserably. They smartly tried something small but the communication was very lacking. The project floundered for a while, and was in a phase of trying to be finished but they just couldn't get the quality to the point of saying the product was ready. The sad part is that one full timer and a couple student interns could have easily finished the project in two to four months, but the group we out-sourced to couldn't finish up in 9+ months so the axe fell and the contract wasn't fullfilled. We/They decided that oursourcing won't be attempted again. The costs of not being able to hit market with a product are just too high.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    4. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I guess the management wasn't smart enough, otherwise they would have let a parallel project with one full-timer and a couple of students and then they could have compared the results.

    5. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by melatonin · · Score: 1

      Apple's recent Aperture debacle, where it was discovered that Aperture was majorly inferior to Adobe's Lightbox in performance, features and quality probably resulted in a major shakeup in Apple's software development divisions.

      What's this bullshit? Lightbox is shit slow and relatively bare bones. It's basically a competitor to iPhoto. Aperture is perfectly useable on a PowerBook G4, where Lightbox crawls like a snail. You obviously haven't used either software.

      Aperture isn't a debacle, Ars Technica's useless performance-oriented review of Aperture is.

      --
      Moderators should have to take a reading comprehension test.
    6. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww, poor baby apologist.

    7. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by ap7 · · Score: 1

      I know it is really fashionable on Slashdot to say that quality of software from India is poor but that wasn't the reason according to a friend who got laid off. I also get the feeling that a lot of Slashdotters must be experiencing orgasms finding out about this. However, many many other companies are still coming in. The outsourcing revenue growth this year is to be around 30%. Total revenue last year was about 25 billion.

      In any case, if you are naive enough to think that those who got laid off from Apple are now going to be destitute, think again. I am betting they got hired the day Apple laid them off. My brother gets 10 calls a day from HR managers offering him jobs.

      Now, I understand that it causes pain when a job moved to India causes pain in the US or elsewhere. But we understand it is a global phenomena. We've experienced it too. There is a huge debate in India about opening up the retail merchandising sector to foreign investment (read Walmart) or buying hundreds of planes from Boeing. We will end up exporting Billions of dollars to the US that way. So it isn't actually an 'You give, I take' situation that Slashdot is so fond of thinking. Remember that corporations, no matter how evil, have shareholders and those shareholders get dividends from profits and they spend money. It ultimately trickles down to the lowest rungs.

      It is amazing than a crowd of people (definitely with above average intelligence) like Slashdot can delude themselves into thinking in ways that keep them in their comfort zones. It isn't a cakewalk here in India, you know. We jump through 10 times as many hoops as you people do, only to end up getting 10 times lesser money than you people do.

      Sorry for the blabbering guys. Now I will go plot the eventual takeover of the US of A ;-).

    8. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Takeover the USA - big order, somebody already did it. You have to take over Mexico.........

    9. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Sigged the parent:

      when did slashdot become an unofficial apple forum? i had to block the apple section!

      When Apple released a Unix variant. Obvi.

    10. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      What place have you worked at where management actually did that? You're expending money for a typical project, and then increasing the cost by running a parallel Indian effort. Its presuming the goal is to derive an opinion from an empirical test (which would be anecdotal anyway), and not the goal to maximize ROI. Its almost a sure money loser, even if the project meets delivery targets.

      Its more gaming efficient to hire a team for a task which you can live with a failure. If they suceed, you profit. If they do fail, you learn what you needed to learn. At least this way, you minimize your financial loss to one team (not two), and give yourself a chance to make money.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    11. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I know it is really fashionable on Slashdot to say that quality of software from India is poor but that wasn't the reason according to a friend who got laid off.

      Perhaps it's fashionable to say so on Slashdot because that's the (admittedly anecdotal) evidence Slashdotters have seen. I'll relate my experience: I worked in an office with 6-7 Indians. When business began to boom they opened a satellite office in Chennai. The company hired 10 programmers. The head of operations (again, Indian) personally interviewed all the candidates and proclaimed them as "top notch". The reality was completely different. Only two of them were worth a damn. We had to filter their progress reports ("80% complete" meant "Not started", "Almost complete" meant "Just started", "Down to fixing bugs" meant "Rewriting to the spec that we ignored in the first place"). Lest you think that's just an ignorant racist American speaking -- that was from the Indian project manager. (As an aside, the company only had two non-Indian employees. I was one and the other guy was a "token" VP used to whitewash their appearance to corporate clients). Sure we could have only hired 2 guys here for the cost of the 10 guys over there. But we would have done a lot better on schedule.

    12. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Apple did this not only with software, but with hardware.

    13. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      btw, i like your sig too. insightful as a mod sucks. /. really needs to contemplate some more mod options.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    14. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by cygnus · · Score: 1

      i think Ars' review was spot on, but the problem wasn't that the whole Aperture project was poor quality as the OP claims, but just that it was released too early in its dev cycle.

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    15. Re:It wasn't cost, so was it quality? by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Yeah. "Redundant" is nearly useless as well. Maybe we can bug Taco to update the mods after the skin-change is rolled out.

  22. Sadly I bet Apple found... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That the technology transfer was not happening as smoothly as they thought it would, and the costs became an issue too. Having worked for Apple, then NeXT, then Apple/NeXT and finally Apple again, I have seen this problem long before it became fashionable to outsource oversees. It was true stateside between regions of this country, and even more so with language/cultural barriers in this global market. The axe swings many ways, this time back to another country, possibly back to the US.

  23. Re:Every single Apple product is foreign made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. It also helps corporate/industrial espionage.

  24. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How much? $67,922.23 ?

    Because that's how much i earn in India @ 43.5 to a dollar.

  25. Why is it offensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Personally, I find it just as offensive companies whimsically shift work forces,

    Why?

    Employees whimsically shift employers too, when they get a better offer.

    And when a company does this, it'll often hire an equal or larger number of just as deserving and at least as needy people elsewhere.

    If this team is as hot as they think they are, why don't they start up a competing product to whatever it is Apple hired them to do -- and if they do prove worthy, Apple'll have to pay a premium to get them back. Oh. They weren't really that great. Then IMHO Apple did nothing wrong.

    1. Re:Why is it offensive? by slick_rick · · Score: 1

      Non-competes are pretty much standard fair in the software biz AFAICT, or at least every job I've ever been offered required one.. The "non-compete" agreement usually indicates that you can't go to work for a competitor or steal a bunch of company talent and start your own competitor. From what I can tell this was just Apple starting up a support center in India, so it wasn't software dev.. So your "they should just leave and make something better" comment doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

          It was a pretty stupid move anyway IMHO as Apple charges an arm and a leg for their stuff and people pay the premium to have a premium experience. If I want to talk to tech support in India, I'll just buy a Dell for half the cost.

      --
      apt-get install redhat please god - Me (take it easy, I love Debian)
    2. Re:Why is it offensive? by uncqual · · Score: 1
      The "non-compete" agreement usually indicates that you can't go to work for a competitor or steal a bunch of company talent and start your own competitor.

      FWIW, in California, most non-compete clauses are difficult to enforce. Generally, a clause that prevents you from working for a competitor is invalid. Clauses that prevent you from stealing employees seem to be more enforceable (as they don't interfere with your ability to earn a living).

      Nevertheless, it's cheapest just to get the unenforceable clauses excised BEFORE you sign (when you have more leverage). This process can add a couple weeks to the negotiation process but it's the company lawyers that are getting paid - you don't need one. I've never had a problem getting these clauses excised. After you leave, these clauses can cost you a little money in attorney fees to get them declared unenforceable.

      (Getting these excised also makes it clear to the CEO very early on that you're not willing to put up with crap - as the ad says, this is "priceless")

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    3. Re:Why is it offensive? by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1
      If this team is as hot as they think they are, why don't they start up a competing product to whatever it is Apple hired them to do -- and if they do prove worthy, Apple'll have to pay a premium to get them back. Oh. They weren't really that great. Then IMHO Apple did nothing wrong.

      Let me guess... You're a libertarian? There are lots of situations your overly simplistic explanation doesn't account for... For starters a bunch of programmers in the developing world cannot compete with a company like Apple at anything, period, without being bought out by a competitor or a miracle. Apple just has too much advertising, branding, infrastructure, experience, size, ability to dump produts at a loss, etc. Not to mention the case of Apple having hired them to, say, build a new trackwheel for ipods, or one of a thousand other internal projects that require coordination with the rest of Apple, in which case your suggestion doesn't make sense.

      In short, take your invisible hand and shove it up the orifice of your choice :-)

  26. Apple Pulls Out of India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's weird, I was under the impression it is usually companies like Microsoft that fuck countries.

    1. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      A bunch of people have been paid 5 month's salary for 3 months work. How is that 'fucking'?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    2. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha! You little M$ fanboi troll! How much is Billy-boy paying you? I so sick of all these pro-M$ astroturfers.

    3. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I forgot this is Slashdot. After a man and woman have had sex, the man typically "pulls out", or withdraws his sexual organ.

    4. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by Larthallor · · Score: 1

      How about "betrayed"?

      This wasn't a case of a company going belly up or a single developer having the misfortune of getting hired on at an existing branch just in time for it to get whacked. Apple came in to India, went through all of the paper work and planning to set up operations, hired a bunch of people, etc. The expectation for anyone considering this job is that all of this implies an intention to stay for longer than 5 months. That and the fact I'm sure that the jobs were posted as permanent positions. Geez, even most contract work is for periods of time longer than those people were employed! Imagine you left your company for this great opportunity or had been unemployed for some time and finally found salvation. Just when you were getting used to things BAM, "it's not you, it's me." And not just for you,but for the whole operation!

      Whether you want to believe it or not, there is a minimum level of commitment inherent in creating and recruiting for open positions. Apple had gone way past the point of no return and should have stuck it out for at least a couple of years before reevaluating.

      If you still don't agree, imagine your wife deciding to leave you after 5 days for some better looking or richer guy. Not that this would be fun after any length of time, but this would show the same kind of complete disrespect for others that Apple has just demonstrated.

      (btw, I'm writing this on my Mac Mini, so don't assume I'm generally anti-Apple)

    5. RE: Apple Pulls Out of India by kimanaw · · Score: 3, Funny
      (Obligatory - and very old - SNL reference)

      "A frustrated India was unavailable for comment."
      --
      007: "Who are you?"
      Pussy: "My name is Pussy Galore."
      007: "I must be dreaming..."
    6. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Three months on the job != three months work. Think of the opportunity cost if you're not expecting the contract to last that long: these people could have, e.g, bought houses, moved cities, made long term plans (bump up your marriage date with your sweetheart, etc) with the expectation they were being employed for the long term. My last job required me to relocate to another continent, and I sold literally everything I could not fit in a suitcase to do so. I would not have been so pleased to hear after three months "Oops, sorry about that -- we'll be generous and pay you double for your time here, though".

    7. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


      "Whether you want to believe it or not, there is a minimum level of commitment inherent in creating and recruiting for open positions. "

      The same minimum level of commitment required of the employee who takes the position. How much notice do people in India have to give their employer before they quit?

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    8. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      "My last job required me to relocate to another continent,"

      Well, we can be pretty sure that everyone involved was Indian. And there are plenty of jobs in Bangalore, and people job-hop all the time, apparently.

      So I seriously doubt there will be any significant hardships. They basically got two months' free pay.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    9. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by Larthallor · · Score: 1

      There is a minimum level of commitment an employee makes when employed. There are social norms about workplace behavior, 2 weeks notice, etc. More closely parallel, I personally feel a commitment to a new employer strongly enough to prevent me from taking late offers from other potential employers I was interviewing even if the 2nd offer was a little better. If I accept a $50,000 job offer from one employer and the next day get a second offer for $55,000 I'm going to stay with the first employer because I made an agreement by accepting their offer.

      That being said, there is a definite asymmetry between employer and employee in companies of any size, especially ones as large as Apple Computers. If one of Apple's employees quits, Apple's India operation would have lost about 3% (1/30th) of it's capacity. Contrast that to the 100% earning capacity lost by the employees Apple just stabbed in the back.

    10. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      "Contrast that to the 100% earning capacity lost by the employees Apple just stabbed in the back."

      Oh, bollocks. We're talking about people in Bangalore, here, not some small town where Apple is the only employer for miles. They didn't lose "100% earning capacity". In fact, if they get new jobs quickly, as is likely (some already have), they'll be at 200% earning capacity.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    11. Re:Apple Pulls Out of India by Larthallor · · Score: 1

      In fact, if they get new jobs quickly, as is likely (some already have), they'll be at 200% earning capacity.

      Well, now that you put it that way, I'm sure those employees are all jumping for joy at their new "raises". Look, Apple screwed them over. They didn't kill them or chop off their arms and prevent them from ever being employed again, that's true. But Apple's move was shitty and low class and they should know better. Who do they think they are, EA?

      On top of this, it really makes one wonder what the hell is going on with the management there to have to reverse course so abruptly.

  27. Apple - for the win. by Glonoinha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Holy fuck - that does it ... I'm going downtown and buying an Apple tomorrow.
    I don't know which, maybe an Intel Mini, maybe an iPod - but something.

    Good job Apple.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Apple - for the win. by mkopparam · · Score: 1

      Chances are that thing is likely to have been made in some poor third world country that needed the jobs. Now, were you gloating?

  28. Stuck on .NET and Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most Indian CS majors (not talking about IIT grads here) come out just knowing C#/VB .NET. Its hard to train them to learn Objective-C or any other language they are used to since all of their CS skills are bound to a single language. Go to any job posting in India for .NET and you will get millions of programmers who know everythinhg about .NET. Ask for people who know Objective-C or anything non-Microsoft base, then you will get almost nobody. Its hard to find programmers in India with Mac OS x experiance, or even *nix experiance.

    1. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Indian CS majors (not talking about IIT grads here) come out just knowing C#/VB .NET. Its hard to train them to learn Objective-C or any other language they are used to since all of their CS skills are bound to a single language. Go to any job posting in India for .NET and you will get millions of programmers who know everythinhg about .NET. Ask for people who know Objective-C or anything non-Microsoft base, then you will get almost nobody. Its hard to find programmers in India with Mac OS x experiance, or even *nix experiance.

      That is a problem in more places than just India although in Europe at least it isn't as quite bad as you describe the situation in India. C# and Java developers are becoming available in sixpacks with a dozen PHP/MYSQL monkeys thrown in for free but it is getting harder to find developers, especially younger ones, who can do major projects in C or C++ never mind Objective C.

    2. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be quite an authority,.. closed in on Indian Techies ..
      Appreciate that ... but some times its good to have an open mind ..
      http://www.linux-india.org/

    3. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by ebasconp · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe there is no a lot of people with strong skills on Objective-C or another platform/architecture, but,

      do you think they cannot learn as fast (or maybe faster) as an american or european can? If the person is a good C# programmer, (s)he knows to program on any object oriented programming language, and going "back" to another older language is not really hard.

      --
      ------ hand fits giving
    4. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you think they cannot learn as fast (or maybe faster) as an american or european can? If the person is a good C# programmer, (s)he knows to program on any object oriented programming language, and going "back" to another older language is not really hard.

      I've programmed a lot in many languages and OS's. I would definitely agree that once you have a few language under your belt, it is not hard to pick more up quickly. One issue (I have not programmed in C# or NET) that would concern me is the historically narrow utility and short shelf life of Window's skill sets. I would also be concerned about the science of information being neglected for the trade of programming--an unsurprisingly common problem for Windows tradespeople. All this naturally depends on what I am hiring for. If I have a closely specified design for Windows with a strong quality team to validate their work, then a bunch of undergrad coders might be just the ticket (tip: that's a recipe for successful offshoring regardless). At the other extreme, designing a server from a prototype would not be appropriate for a tech school grad regardless of their nationality or expected wage.

      I believe this is the main reason that offshore projects fail.

    5. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the problem with many developers whose skills are completely based on .NET is their extreme dependence on drag and drop solutions. Despite substandard coding skills, they can produce working output using the tools. The minute they need to actually code anything beyond the capability of the toolset, or to learn another (non- .NET) programming language, they're dead in the water.

      Also, Microsoft certification isn't a good way to judge a person's skills. I've seen "reviewers" floating around on the Internet that are nothing more than verbatim copies of the exam questions with answers. All one has to do is memorize these reviewers. They impart no real understanding.

    6. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by debiansid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most Indian CS majors (not talking about IIT grads here) come out just knowing C#/VB .NET

      Actually, No. Most Indian CS majors come out knowing nothing more than basic C/C++ and probably a bit of Java. Their projects are almost always in VB6 as development is very quick n easy on it. C/C++ knowledge is more or less theoretical as our education system gives more importance to theory than practice.

      Most CS guys in India go by hype and industry requirement and that means it's either .Net or J2EE. .Net, like VB, is preferred again because it's easier to learn (drag and drop controls, etc.). In fact, many devs here tout C#/VB.Net as difficult platforms to learn as they're not as braindead as VB6.

      Also, there is very less genuine interest in software development and CS on the whole. S/W Development is a means to earn money, nothing more.

      Its hard to find programmers in India with Mac OS x experiance, or even *nix experiance.

      You might still get many with *nix experience but Mac OSX, not a chance. There's hardly anyone in India who *uses* Macs in the first place; PCs are way cheaper, especially with a pirated copy of Windows and all its apps.

    7. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by slamb · · Score: 1
      Its hard to train them to learn Objective-C or any other language they are used to since all of their CS skills are bound to a single language.

      Then they have no CS skills. In fundamental areas like the design and analysis of data structures and algorithms, language is almost[*] totally irrelevant. I'm not sure what CS you could possibly know that is bound to a single language.

      I'm told there are actual good people in India, but the few I've dealt with (Java and C programmers) are like this. They sort of know a language or two, but there's nothing else there. There are also plenty of people like this in the United States, unfortunately.

      [*] - There are some differences, like that you can't mutate stuff in a pure functional language, at least without a crazy optimizer. But certainly not between, say, C# and Java - both imperative, same GC system, VM model, object model. Same language, slightly different syntax.

    8. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by jma05 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am an Indian. I agree with the observation but disagree with the generalization. I lot of people I knew in India were indeed strongly oriented to the MS tool chain (not even Borland). I, on the other hand have tried just about every major programming language and most programming paradigms. To put in context, I do NOT have a CS major. I am a physician who programs/sys-admins as a GRA around 20hrs/week to pay for a PhD in the US. But I would have still programmed as a hobby (and have for about 14 years now) even if I did not have this need.

      My reasons for this behavior are ...

      1.) Most Indian developers see programming as a lucrative career. So it is strictly business for most of them. Most devs of this kind don't go home and continue to program for "fun". It's work. If you can't sell your Haskell skills, no point in acquiring them.
      2.) The educational institutions have evolved this way too. Most devs learn programming, not from college (even if they have a CS major) but from independent training centers that train you in job focused skills but not the whole "Computer Science" theory. The training is strictly main stream IT (to emphasize again - not CS). I on the other hand, am a geek, self-taught, learned programming for the sake of programming and even lectured a few Masters classes on Software Engineering and HCI.
      3.) Finally the disagreement. Why generalize on Indians?. Now that I am in US, every non-geek programmer I have seen here is not much different either and is just as hopelessly married to his language. However, US citizens tend to follow their hearts when it comes to profession. The economy allows it. So geek / non-geek programmer ratio is more favorable. In India, you don't have that luxury. People follow the money (for good reasons). They do work hard at the skills but you can only get so much into it if you are not inherently passionate about it.

      If you want good Indian programmers, scope them out and do your own interviews and select them just like you would locally (perhaps only possible if you have an Indian branch for your company). That outsourcing corporation will not cater your non-generic needs.

    9. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by XchristX · · Score: 1

      It has been pointed out (several times on slashdot threads themselves) that learning programming logic and concepts is more important that a specific language.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    10. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Actually it's worse than that. One of my Indian colleagues at work (here in the US) told me that the typcical Indian CS grad doesn't have much hands-on programming experience AT ALL (let alone any Unix, or embedded experience). Because of lack of money, most (obviously there are exceptions such as IIT) Indian universites have very few computers, so the amount of computer time is very limited - a CS degree over there is much more theoretical than hand-on programming.

    11. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by vinay.ys · · Score: 1

      What nonsense.

      I'm a CS graduate from the University in Karnataka State. We don't study C# or VB.NET as part of our curriculum. Infact, CS isn't about language at all. We study core subjects like Data Structures, Design and Analysis of Algorithms, Computer Organizations, compiler design, Object Oriented Analysis and Design, Software Engineering, Databases, Distributed Computing, Network and Systems programming and many more. In the process, we learn C, C++, Cobol and all our labs are on Linux. We have mini projects and full term projects for which we can use any appropriate technology/language.

      But, yes, neither I or nobody I know of knows Objective C. It's not all that popular here. People learn C# and .NET outside the university on their own, or they are introduced to it when they do internship at companies who use such technologies.

      --
      Vinay Y S http://vinay-ys.blogspot.com
    12. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My answer: they probably can't learn as fast. This has nothing to do with race, or intelligence, or culture, or what-have-you (well, academic culture matters)--it's the same problem that the US had in the late 90s, where schools would churn out "programmers" who didn't know what they were doing, they just knew one language. People who learn that way simply cannot adapt effectively until they go back and either repeat the process with the new language/style or just plain do it over again the right way. There needs to be a shift to teaching the science/craft and away from teaching the languages before they'll be able to adapt as fast as the areas that have already gone through that.

    13. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      I believe you're making two points here: first, that the job market in India is fairly mono-cultural, and secondly, that most Indian developers' skillsets are tied in to a single technology.

      As far as the first point is concerned, I'd disagree. A close friend of mine is a project leader in a certain company that develops its core product for Symbian phones. He says he had to search for three-odd months in the region (South East Asia, btw), before finally falling back on the mother-ship, and "importing" some developer there. Bottomline: the job market is still fairly diverse; if anything, I think it's more J2EE-heavy, than .net-focussed. But you're right about Objective-C/Mac OS X in particular; I doubt that there's any Apple penetration in Indian universites. MS, otoh, is heavily into their student .net groups and that Imagine Cup thing.

      I would, however, totally agree when you say that most folks' CS skills are tied into a single technology. To be fair though, that's exactly what the market wants; Indian IT is all about meeting client requirements ('code-monkeying' as some of you folks so endearingly call it), and less about innovating products, mostly for the fact that there's no local market for IT at all. Consider, for instance, the Indian flavour of Google News; this might not be immediately obvious to a non-Indian, but consider this:- we have the world's largest number of languages and the world's largest number of newspapers published. There are close to 2,500 newspapers published every day in my hometown. And yet, consider the number of news sources featured there; China, for all its allegedly reprehensive Great Firewall, has more news-sources in Google News (zh-CN).

      This, as usual, can be explained by India's Great Big Divide; we might have the world's largest IT workforce or whatever, but there is simply no local market for IT! Most Indian geeks in urban India don't really realise this, surrounded as they are in Wi-Fi enabled malls, and mobile-phone-carrying teenagers, but our technology penetration levels are waaay off, even compared to other Asian countries. You begin to think: for a country that wants to be a knowledge society, this is a great place to start.

    14. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand have tried just about every major programming language and most programming paradigms. To put in context, I do NOT have a CS major.

      I would argue that programming languages were some of the least valuable things I picked up from my education. The most valuable were mathematics, design, and how to think like an engineer.

      Don't get me wrong, languages and paradigms are valuable, but I've determined that if you are a good software engineer then the language (/os/api/whatever) doesn't matter, and if you are a bad one then the language also doesn't seem to matter.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    15. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by jma05 · · Score: 1

      True. What matters is the art of "complexity management". Programming languages and paradigms are simply one aspect of it. But you must understand that I am answering a very specific observation with regard to languages.

    16. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by ebasconp · · Score: 1

      Of course, I have several "click-drag'n'drop-double click-develop" (C-DND-2C-D) friends; but you cannot generalize: "The Indian people is C-DND-2C-D", "The American not", "The European not"...

      I have some european friends that are not able to program without form designers and wizards and I have some chinese (and latin) colleagues that are able to develop a lot of interesting and superior things in the bare metal!

      --
      ------ hand fits giving
    17. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by aamitan · · Score: 1

      Yup, Everybody who is a guy genuinely interested in computers here will either run Windows 'cuz he loves Games or immerse himself in Linux. There are few and far between who work in other myriad OSs like Apple ( Yes, it is used RRRRRRARELY), *BSD. I would in general support your statement about non-IIT grads but there are a few exceptions to the rule like BITS-Pilani http://www.bits-pilani.ac.in/, NSIThttp://www.nsit.ac.in/, IIIT-Hyderabad http://www.iiit.net/ and a few others also.

    18. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Indian CS majors (not talking about IIT grads here) come out just knowing C#/VB .NET.

      IMO, most Indian CS majors graduate knowing less about their art than a first year CS student in the US. The reason: There is significant pressure in India to be either a Doctor or a Software Engineer, and so anyone, even those without any interest, innate ability, or skill, will be be a Software Engineer.

      In the US, generally only those with interest and ability are able ot make it through a CS program, weeding out everyone that's only in it for the money, whereas in india all the would-be "business majors" and "liberal arts majors" take CS instead.

      This is why outsourcing to India will ultimately fail. There are good engineers over there, but the average quality is so low that companies would be better off hiring a college intern in the US instead of a CS graduate in India.

      This is an unpopular opinion, so I'm sure it will get modded down, but it really is true.

    19. Re:Stuck on .NET and Windows by udhay · · Score: 1

      If what you say is true, then yahoo! (a BSD shop) or Novell (most of Evolution is done out of Bangalore) wouldn't be here.

      --
      -- God is silent. Now if we can only get Man to shut up.
  29. Re:if quality count by glebd · · Score: 1

    Um, it's "grammar" actually, and no, English is not my first language either.

  30. Re:if quality count by InsurgentGeek · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, I might buy the Russian part of this comment - but China? Are you nuts? You've clearly had no experience with the state of outsourcing in China. The current lack of skills of the average Chinese IT worker looks like India in 1981. 1,000's of bodies at extraordinarily low wages with essentially no skills.

    The biggest scam going right now is onshore U.S. companies fronting for these masses of "programmers" through mergers with Chinese companies. If you think organizations have been disappointed by outsourcing to India - you haven't seen anything yet.

    This will be the next big scam - unfortunately the workers and the investors will take the shaft while the dealmakers take the money. Not one of these deals goes down with a few $'s making their way to a Hong Kong "subsidiary" of the company.

    Just my opinions of course.

  31. Payback's a bitch-Flipside. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "US jobs get moved to India because US capitalists want to increase their profits by getting the same job done for less money in India."

    And US workers want the jobs to come back so they can make more money (salary). Everyone's looking out for their own interest. It's just that you only hear one side (mean old business, woe is me worker).

  32. corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    My guess would be that Apple was having the squeeze put on them by
    corrupt government officials and just decided to say "screw it".

    1. Re:corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that is the only thing I've heard that explains this story. Kinda annoyed at myself for not thinking of it sooner.

  33. Pressure from customers? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    As I remember, there was considerable shock when it was announced that Apple was moving some technical support operations to India.

    I think this might have been in response to that backlash, which at least means Apple listens to its customers.

    As you may remember this is even a mini-trend. Dell also moved much of their support operation back from India when customers complained.

    I notice others feel sorry for the Indians, and I have some sympathy, but I could never understand those thick accents. So I think Apple's decision was a wise one. I was baffled as to why they would have gone in in the first place. I could have told them there would be customer hostility concerning the move.

    D

    1. Re:Pressure from customers? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I was baffled as to why they would have gone in in the first place. I could have told them there would be customer hostility concerning the move.

      Just the typical herd mentality. Everyone and their dog is being outsourced, so every company has to do it. Some middle manager at Apple probably got the brilliant idea of outsourcing with the expectation of getting a senior position as an award and started pushing for it. What a lot of companies are starting to realize is that outsourcing is not the magic bullet for savings, productivity or customer satisifaction that many expected. It's not surprising that companies are pulling out.

    2. Re:Pressure from customers? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Kiss my F.A.Q. :P

  34. when did socialism go bust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and why are people so unable to understand this?

    china = communist country, you know, where all your 'capitalist' corporations buy their raw materials and computers

    europe = socialist countries

    canada = socialist country

    india = socialist country

    USA = going to become socialist very soon because the health care system is horrifically broken

    1. Re:when did socialism go bust? by ByteGuerrilla · · Score: 1

      I agree, except for the bit about China being communist... they're fascists, or state capitalists, call it what you will.

      --

      A block of code, sufficiently well-written, is indistinguishable from magick.

  35. say what? by BigBir3d · · Score: 5, Funny

    Considering the low-cost, high-quality talent pool that Bangalore offers, it is unclear why Apple decided to shut shop just over a month after it commenced operations.

    The person that wrote this has never dealt with Indian tech support I take it.

    1. Re:say what? by EddydaSquige · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your joke has a lot of insight to it. About 3 months ago I called apple care, which used to be the best damed tech support around, and the guy on the other end gave me so much obviously wrong information that I have doubt that knew anything at all about the Mac. On a brand new Quad (I was having monitor problems) he suggested that I didn't have the right video card to run a 23" screen, and suggested I install an older video card that wouldn't even fit in the PCI Express slots. I was flabbergasted at his handling of the problem, he paid no attention when I informed him that his solution would never work. Not only did I file complaint through the normal channels, but my reseller filed a complaint through their Apple rep. Worse tech support experience ever. I've had better service with ISP support.

    2. Re:say what? by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1
      Someone just has to point to it here: callcentermovie.com

      12 minutes or so. Funny.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    3. Re:say what? by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's bizarre... You can't even order a quad G5 with a graphics card that won't handle Apple's entire range of monitors.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've had better service with ISP support.

      The last time I called my ISP for support, "Josh" suggested that since I couldn't connect through any of the local access numbers, that I try a certain "500" number instead. He added that "you have to work out the billing arrangements with your phone company first." I had to tell him twice that my ISP (and his employer, supposedly) WAS the phone company - and one of the biggest in the United States! Hmm...

      Bottom line was I knocked it off for the evening, and service was restored the next day.

    5. Re:say what? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


      Maybe he thought you had a Quadra.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  36. grammE(?)r lol GRAMMER!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh heh

  37. Socialism is all around! Open Source IS socialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  38. Why the world buys Indian planes, train,cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    That's why the world buys Indian planes, train, cars... Oh, wait, no one does! Have you seen there trains? When they say, "Get on the train", they get ON the train, in the train, under the train. Weird, man, weird! And there cars all have three wheels, and look like a rikshaw with a motor and wheel up front. Weird, man, weird! I don't think they have any planes since they don't have even paved roads. Weird, man, weird. Did you notice the cattle in the streets? Time to cook up some steaks if you ask me. Weird, man, weird!

  39. Mixed metaphors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hope they don't cry over those spilled beans. But that's what you get when you count your chickens before they cross the road.

  40. Socialism??? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hear that europe is more heavily tilted towards socialism - especially France.

    Actually most of the European policital forces usually mislabeled as 'Socialists' or even 'Communists' by US right wingers are actually modern Social Democrats who have become moderate to the point where they generally do not see a conflict between a democratic society with a capitalist market economy and their own goals which in turn means they have very little in common with Marxism, Communism or classical Socialism. To call political parties like the British labor party or even the German PDS/Linkspartei Socialists would actually be considered an insult by a true die-hard Socialist.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Socialism??? by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually most of the European policital forces usually mislabeled as 'Socialists' or even 'Communists' by US right wingers are actually modern Social Democrats who have become moderate to the point where they generally do not see a conflict between a democratic society with a capitalist market economy and their own goals which in turn means they have very little in common with Marxism, Communism or classical Socialism.

      Maybe, it could be that, for example, the UK's labor party describes themselves as socialist on their website: http://www.labour.org.uk/aboutlabour

      The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party....The Labour Party was set up in 1900 to fight for representation for the Labour movement - trade unions and socialist societies

      Now you might not think they are "hardcore" socialists or "true" socialists, but you can't blame crazy right-wingers for labelling them socialists when they use that term themselves.

    2. Re:Socialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you might not think they are "hardcore" socialists or "true" socialists, but you can't blame crazy right-wingers for labelling them socialists when they use that term themselves.

      Sure you can. The problem with right-wing nuts is that they are functionally illiterate. If they see the word "socialist" they cannot take it in context (because they don't know how to read). They only can understand that the "S" word has appeared to tarnish everything around which it appears. I doubt this paragraph is any more comprehensible to a right-wing windbag, and only literate folks are chuckling at this point, so let me explain it another way.

      In the Republican Party platform the following statement appears (pp 21), "Building a Better World Based on Democratic Governments..." Does this mean that Republicans are actually Democrats? If you are a right-wing nut, and want to remain logically consistent, yes it does. Do I expect that a right-wing nut is capable of logic at all, let alone consistency? Hah!

    3. Re:Socialism??? by kirk__243 · · Score: 1
      Maybe the British Labour Party think that they're socialist, but they're pretty conservative in all reality - especially under Tory Blair.

      The real socialist countries in Europe can be found in Scandinavia. Everyone is supported, tax is ridiculously high but no one minds because the government actually looks after people, and many big businesses are just another branch of the government. It's still a democracy, but it's socialist.

    4. Re:Socialism??? by Varitek · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a democratic republic?

      Labour used to be Socialist. The dropped that ideal when they abandoned a committment to the common ownership of the means of production (aka Clause 4). Under Tony Blair, they've become common-or-garden Thatcherites, committed to privatising everything, whether it produces better social services or not. To call them socialists is pure ignorance, of what socialism is and of what the Labour party has become.

    5. Re:Socialism??? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      +1 Finally

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    6. Re:Socialism??? by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      Actually most of the European policital forces usually mislabeled as 'Socialists' or even 'Communists' by US right wingers are actually modern Social Democrats who have become moderate to the point where they generally do not see a conflict between a democratic society with a capitalist market economy and their own goals which in turn means they have very little in common with Marxism, Communism or classical Socialism. To call political parties like the British labor party or even the German PDS/Linkspartei Socialists would actually be considered an insult by a true die-hard Socialist.

      Their economic policies are definitely socialist. Which is why so many European countries are in an economic death spiral.

      Not purely socialist, this is true. That's why France and Germany haven't collapsed financially - yet - the way Russia did. But their government spending is simply not supportable by their economies, and that's entirely due to socialist policy.

      (The US is presently running a huge budget deficit, but in contrast to the other countries I mentioned, economic growth is more than sufficient to make up for it. US government debt as a proportion of GDP is trending downwards.)

    7. Re:Socialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The real socialist countries in Europe can be found in Scandinavia.

      This is only half true. The welfare states here in Scandinavia are very extensive, but the economies are not socialist in the classical sense, because industry tends to be privately owned, and is not planned by the state. In other words, the Scandinavian economics consist largely of privately owned industries driven by market forces, together with extensive public services. What distinguishes our economies from others is the high level of public services, and the resulting high levels of taxation.

      In contrast to Scandinavian welfare statism, British and French socialism in the second half of the 20th century entailed nationalisation of vast swathes of industry, resulting in state ownership and control of much of the means of production (eg the nationalisation of British Leyland brought most of the British car industry into state ownership). I don't believe large scale nationalisation of industry ever occurred in West Germany.

    8. Re:Socialism??? by ByteGuerrilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Labour Party describe themselves as socialists to try and keep the socialists on their side. They are far from socialist now.

      They used to sing the Red Flag before their party conferences and believed in state ownership of economy. When Tony Blair became Labour leader, he removed Clause IV from Labour doctrine (the most sacrosanct clause the party had, it was about public ownership of the highest levels of the economy) and stopped them singing the Red Flag. To try and convince socialists that they are still socialist, they have this apparent 'middle way', where arrangements called Public-Private Partnerships are arranged. This is basically privatisation by another means. Example of a PPP: hiring private company Borlis to maintain public highways.

      The Labour Party is as conservative as the Conservatives used to be, and in moving this way they've forced the Conservatives even further out to the Right.

      --

      A block of code, sufficiently well-written, is indistinguishable from magick.

    9. Re:Socialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, sir! This annoys me to no end on Slashdot, me being a "die-hard socialist"(with regards to economy, not with regards to the tragic lack of respect for democracy which has plagued most - or all - socialist movements until this point).

      I have no problem with people disagreeing with my ideology(libertarianism and other free-market-centered ideologies seem to be very dominant on Slashdot), but I do have a problem with people calling every European politician that is not on the extreme right(by European standards) a "socialist".

      That said, right-wing(by their standards) Americans seem to label "Social Security" a socialist scheme. By those standards, most European politicians probably are "socialists".

    10. Re:Socialism??? by ccmay · · Score: 1
      They only can understand that the "S" word has appeared to tarnish everything around which it appears.

      I agree, but you said it, not me.

      -ccm

      --
      Too much Law; not enough Order.
    11. Re:Socialism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Their economic policies are definitely socialist. Which is why so many European countries are in an economic death spiral.

      Not purely socialist, this is true. That's why France and Germany haven't collapsed financially - yet - the way Russia did. But their government spending is simply not supportable by their economies, and that's entirely due to socialist policy.

      (The US is presently running a huge budget deficit, but in contrast to the other countries I mentioned, economic growth is more than sufficient to make up for it. US government debt as a proportion of GDP is trending downwards.)


      Rubbish. The European countries with the largest state sectors, the Scandinavian countries, have the strongest economies in Europe, hence the notion that it is the size of the state sectors leading to problems in France and Germany is clearly not tenable. The reality is that very rigid labour markets are responsible for their high unemployment rates: owing to the labour laws, it is virtually impossible to get rid of unnecessary workers when times are bad, so firms are very reluctant to take on new workers when times are good, and the result is high levels of unemployment. This labour market rigidity is entirely unrelated to the size of the welfare state, eg the Scandinavian labour markets are amongst the most flexible in Europe (and this is acceptable to workers because the high level of state support to the unemployed means that losing a job will not destroy an individual's way of life during the time that the individual is retraining or looking for a new job), so unemployment rates are low.

      As to growth, the higher growth of the American economy versus the European economies is almost entirely down to demographics. The high level of immigration to the USA leads to a constantly growing labour supply, and hence higher total output. When looked at in per capita terms, which is what matters for the standard of living, American growth rates are much less impressive. Moreover, any advantage that does exist evaporates when working hours are taken into consideration (American workers 'choose' to work much longer hours than most European workers would tolerate).

      In other words, if you constantly add more workers to the economy, and demand that they work longer and longer hours, with virtually no annual holidays (in Scandinavia, we get much longer holidays than you do in the USA, in addition to much shorter working hours when we're not on holiday), you're obviously going to see an increase in output, but the value of this is unclear. If I can already afford a quality of life I like, working longer hours, or giving up some of my holiday, to produce an even higher income does not raise my standard of living, but lowers it! On the other hand, if the accumulation of more and more possessions has greater value to you than your free time, spending ever more time working will allow you to buy more things (though I can't see the point of owning more and more things, if you have no time to enjoy them).

      The problem of sustainability of the welfare state is common to all industrial countries, because our societies are ageing. The average lifespan is increasing, and with a fixed retirement age, this means a smaller portion of life is being spent working. In order to offset this, the retirement age must obviously be increased, to restore the proportion of work years to pension years.

      The American 'solution' of bringing in more and more immigrants only delays the inevitable, since the immigrants will one day grow old too. Hence it is no solution at all, but more akin to a ticking time bomb. If you keep delaying the inevitable by bringing in more and more immigrants, you'll eventually become as overpopulated as places like India, and yet this giant population will still age, and so you'll still have to face the situation eventually (only it will be much worse).

      Incidentally, with unemployment levels similar to the USA overall, all of the Scandinavian governments are running budget surplusses, wit

  41. severing one's package by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 4, Funny

    This would be less disturbing if your screen name weren't what it is.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    1. Re:severing one's package by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, what else would you expect from a "crimson scythe" replying to a "one-eye-johnson"? It's bound to get ugly.

      --
      The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
  42. What? by teslatug · · Score: 3, Funny

    Time to move back to the US.

  43. simply cost and quality related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many companies are coming back to the US for Software Engineering. Especially mid size companies. The company I work for also recently canceled its dealings with its Indian outsourcing firm. They had two reasons:
    1) In 2001 with benefits, a decent Software Eng:
    $60/hour in USA versus $5/hour in India
    In 2006 with benefits, a decent Software Eng:
    $60/hour in USA versus $25/hour in India
    No longer worth the hassle of communication problems and slow response time to fixing defects.
    2) Quality of their work was awful. This seemed to be due to major attrition problems. The attrition rates at the firm we were using were like 50% a year. Even their manager's were job hoping. So nobody really cared about quality since they knew they would be long gone to better pastures before it caught up with them.

    1. Re:simply cost and quality related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company just was forced to do the same with our development branch in Rumania. They had asked a raise which placed the cost of doing business with them at or near what it would be when we do it all in-house. We refused, and they decided to end the agreement with us.

    2. Re:simply cost and quality related by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Same story all across Asia. :-) I've been shown an internal document that I shouldn't have read, but my company, a prominent IT consulting firm in Singapore, expects that up to 75% of its staff will leave the company in two years or less.

    3. Re:simply cost and quality related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is ABSOLUTELY true. In fact, 50% attrition is lower than I've experienced. We've gone through 47 DBAs in the past two years. We make an offer, they accept, then they never show up, or they show but quit after a week. Sometimes they quit after 3-4 months, but very very few last longer than that.

      They will also flat-out lie about why they quit. Usually they say that their relative is sick. Their wife is ill, or their mother has "viral fever". I had one guy say that his brother had a brain tumor... we verified that he was LYING about that! Can you imagine, lying about your brother having a brain tumor just to take a few days off to interview for a better position?

      Every indian I interview wants a 50% (FIFTY percent) increase over their previous job. In 2000 we hired at 6 lakhs (1 lakh = roughly US$2200). Today we hire at 18 lakhs... and the higher-level guys I speak to these days are starting to ask for 24. $53k for an outsourced worker? I don't think so.

      This house of cards is falling apart, bigtime.

    4. Re:simply cost and quality related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an Indian in the US. I maintain close contacts with friends in Bombay. Noone there is talking about 24 lakhs as a developer. They're all still talking about 3-4 lakhs.

      I'm not saying I don't believe you. However, it would be informative if you could list companies and their salaries.

    5. Re:simply cost and quality related by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      We had a very similar experience. We hired a group in India and their code was HORRENDOUS--we have had to replace most of it. A few came over here, two or three were decent one was EXCELLENT, but any time you hire from the very bottom of the barrel, don't expect to get cream.

      I sent their code back a few times, but a lot of it got missed.

      One thing I noticed with the guys that were here: If your group says "We expect more out of you. We want you to think, to NEVER copy & paste, to always write your code with reuse in mind", it kinda works.

      I think that the people in India (and many here) are so focused on speed that they don't feel they are allowed to code correctly. I think if you continually say "Doing it right will get it done faster, trust me" and check their code for a while, you can improve any body's game.

  44. Perhaps they found out... by guruevi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that the cost of outsourcing is higher than the hype tells it to be. A lot of businesses try to outsource to India, and while it might work better for some companies, I guess the cost of a = inferior customer satisfaction and b = more people needed for the same work equals c = higher costs in the long run. And since a is more important for Apple they've seen outsourcing is not a good idea.

    Don't get me wrong over b, I guess there are great people out there, but first of all: they don't speak English very well (ever called an outsourced helpdesk and you know), second of all: they are not educated as we in the westerner countries, so they need to be educated more and longer on the job while we are supposed to get that education through our schools. It's not the inhabitants fault, but India is pretty close to a 3rd world country.

    Next to that they also have a higher constant cost. TFA mentions shipping over some people for education in the states. They can do it 2 ways: ship someone from west -> east and pay big $$$ (250k/year) for someone willing to do that and ship over his family and belongings back and forth every 3-6 months for 30k/year and cover the costs over there for 50k/year. Or ship 20 people every month from east -> west for 2 weeks and cover their costs for 400k/year.

    If you don't do it yourself and outsource your outsourcing to a "specialized" company, you'll see that the costs equal the costs you have here but without the hassle of outsourcing, keeping your customers happy only thing is that you have to keep in account the unions.

    I don't know, while outsourcing could be helping keeping costs down, I think the only thing that should be outsourced is labour by hand without customer contact. This is not because the people over there don't have brains, but simply because of the differences in language and culture. They are trying to fix that too, but what do you think when you call the D-Link helpdesk and "Bob" speaks with an Indian accent and ask how the weather is down there in Ohio? Yes, they have cue sheets with different lines that people in the US would use, but it just sounds wrong, try it.

    And just so I wouldn't break Godwin's law: why didn't hitler outsource his stuff to India?

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Perhaps they found out... by quanticle · · Score: 1

      /*And just so I wouldn't break Godwin's law: why didn't hitler outsource his stuff to India?*/

      Because concentration camp laborers are even cheaper.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    2. Re:Perhaps they found out... by sog_abq · · Score: 1

      I have to dissagree with your comment about education. I've worked school projects with grad students from india and their education background (at least from an engineering aspect) was stronger than any of us american students, yet our code typically was readable and less buggy than our indian counterparts. I present this purely as anecdotal evidence without an explination. If anyone has a good explination, I'm all ears.

    3. Re:Perhaps they found out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several show-stopper issues with outsourcing to India.

      - All the good people are already here making good money. The ones that went back are making even more money. So you get people who were never exposed to the Western world. Some of them are good; they leave for the US/Europe as soon as. You deal with the ones who stay behind.
      - Culture works against you. An average Indian guy you are likely to get will lie and pretend to know things he doesn't. When caught, he will try to bs his way out. By the time you find out the guy doesn't know sh*t, you got steaming mounds of code your boss insists must be "refactored". Interestingly, Chinese culture works the other way round. I deal with a few people in our Chinese office, and they are very impressive. Sure, I've seen plenty of Chinese speedbumps, too, but there's still plenty of good people to choose from.

      I expect a lot of mid-size companies to return from India the way British returned from Afganistan in mid-19th century. The ones likely to stay will be the large corporations that used to hire speedbumps in the US and found the ones in India to be cheaper. Most large corporations run on speedbumps anyway.

    4. Re:Perhaps they found out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The grand-parent doesn't know what he's talking about. When it comes to sciences/engineering/mathematics, the average student from India is better off than the average student in the US. The problem you see with the quality of code however, is indicative of something bigger. While most American kids in grad school are there because they want to, Indian kids are there primarily because they have to.

      More importantly, field selection, be it CS or anything else, is only based on "what is hot" at the moment; not whether the kid cares for it, or whether they have an aptitude for it. So while you have bright kids, they needn't necessarily have the best work ethic or even care about what is going on in the innards of the code---hence the sloppier code.

    5. Re:Perhaps they found out... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      And just so I wouldn't break Godwin's law: why didn't hitler outsource his stuff to India?
      Offtopic I know, but actually, he did. :-)

      Although, it must be mentioned, we were more heavily on the Allied side; the (British) Indian National Army, with its East India Company heritage, was pretty much a mercenary force at large. Most of the war in the Asian theater was fought by Indian soldiers; the World War 2 memorial at Kranji, Singapore, lists more Indian names than that of any other nationality.

      So yup, we've been in this outsourcing business for quite some time now, and in "industries" you wouldn't have imagined of. :-)

    6. Re:Perhaps they found out... by sog_abq · · Score: 1

      unbelievable, a coherent thought on Slashdot of all places. I'd have to agree with your reasoning

  45. Re:if quality count by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1
    No offense, but if quality count, probably me not hire you...

    The written word has an amazing effect at conveying a person's perceived intelligence. When used well, it is to your advantage. When poorly used, it is to your detriment.

    --
    Stop! Dremel time!
  46. Re:if quality count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not trust Chinese engineering at all. If you have bought a cheap gas powered scooter, you would understand what I am talking about. I assume the design and engineering that goes into some of this stuff was only to make a working final product and no consideration was given for actually using the product as it is intended. The battery compartment is under the frame under thin sheet metal and any slight hit under the scooter breaks the battery, the key to start the device only worked for about a week until the whole key and tumbler would spin around together, the pull string broke off after less then two weeks, the mirrors fell of the mirror housing when the temperature went above 80F, the rear brake light lens fell off within minutes without even being touched, the speedometer quit working and the plastic over it was fogged up after a light rain, the plastic headlight socket holder melted, two of the four engine mounting holes cracked (is a rubber grommet for vibration isolation really that expensive?) blah blah blah.

    You get what you pay for.

  47. I have run across a good number of ... by bealzabobs_youruncle · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Indian I.T. contractors who didn't have the real world skills they boast on their resume. I'm not in charge of staffing so I don't know how hard these things are to verify, but I would say we spin out 50% of the non-native contractors we get lately because they simply don't know what they are doing. I've had 5 different Java/J-Boss/Linux pros that have no clue what they are doing, all were from India and all boasted extensive Linux and application server skills, but had never heard of SUDO or what shell script starts J-Boss? Add language barriers in to that equation and it usually isn't worth what we are supposedly saving.

    I know our last 2 contractors had to go through a two week trial period at the agencies expense and we kicked both of them back. We probably get just as many bad American contractors, but the whole point of exporting jobs or importing workers was that we gain talents that aren't available here at a lower price. If their skills and education are all suspect and have to be verified at a greater expense and difficulty than local talent why bother? Apple probably found the same thing.

    1. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by evilviper · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Apple probably found the same thing.

      Yeah, that's probably what happened. You've not jumping to an incredibly wild conclusion or anything...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Amid all the hype, I wonder how many companies actually consider these issues? Given the scrutiny a company gives to US applicants, do most companies forget to apply that scrutiny when trying overseas work, in a blind mad dash to save money?

    3. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by CowbertPrime · · Score: 2, Informative

      There should be absolutely no language barriers at all. All post-11th grade education in India is English-based (India was a British colony after all). So if your staff is university educated, they should be almost as good as native speakers (albeit with an accent). If not, they suck way more than from a technical standpoint and shouldn't be hired in the first place.

    4. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by bealzabobs_youruncle · · Score: 1

      Clearly you haven't work with any H1Bs from India lately.

    5. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The I.T. pros in India are like any other country, about 30% of them know what they are doing, another 30% can muddle through without being destructive and the remainder are frauds and idiots. Quite a few companies have realized they aren't saving anything by selling out the American workforce, I can only hope more do so every day.

    6. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm inclined to disagree with that. I just finished my M.S. at Rutgers, where the majority of the students in the graduate program were either Chinese or Indian. (The lack of U.S. citizens in a graduate program at a state university where tuition is DIRT CHEAP for state residents and pretty inexpensive for others says bad things about U.S. attitudes towards higher education...) The Chinese students, for the most part, barely spoke English at all and I'm surprised any of them were able to complete their classwork given the difficulty of understanding and communicating with their professors and fellow classmates. The Indian students had at least been educated reasonably well in English so that they were understandable. The problem is that while they may have been educated in English since the 11th grade, they were most likely educated in English by a non-native English speaker. Think of the game of Telephone, where after being passed from person to person, a message is distorted so much as to be barely understandable. It's same thing with "second generation" (or more) English language education. Yes, it was possible to communicate with the Indian students and much easier than the Chinese students, but it was still *extremely* difficult due to the thick accents. Yes, even if one's grammar is perfect, a thick accent can make verbal communication extremely difficult. By the way, most of the Indian students in question could write extremely well. It was only their spoken language that was difficult to understand. Unfortunately, even in technical fields, verbal communication is important. In technical support fields where outsourcing is currently the most common, verbal communications is *EVERYTHING*.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    7. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing that you may want to keep in mind is that the Average Indian MS student you meet in college are nothing like an average Indian. They are probably exception or atleast had the good fortunte of having rich parents who could afford to send then to (expensive) private schools. So yeah, the Indian student you met in your MS might speak good english. The average Indian programmer on the other hand..........

    8. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by shmert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly my experience too. We develop java apps, and needed some C++ work for a small part of a project. I posted on craigslist, and googled, and most C++ consultants available on a per-project basis seemed to be in India. So I contacted them. Out of 6 people I contacted, nobody could even compile the stock sample framework that came with the DTK for the app we were developing with. It was quite a frustrating experience.

      My hunch is that the Indian office overpromised and started working on some shoddy hacked together stuff. When it saw the light of day, the plug was pulled.

      --
      You drank my drink, you drunk!
    9. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right, Indians have accents. American's don't.

    10. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by cpn2000 · · Score: 1
      I have had quite similar experiences, both in the US and in India. I saw this same situation here in the US when the job market for tech skills was ultra-hot (think 1999), and I see it now for the techies coming from India.

      It is not a cultural thing, it is simply a overheated job market, and as it cools down only the really skilled will survive, and the rest will be weeded out.

      --
      All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be ... Dark side of the moon
    11. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Do you really think it's odd that Americans are choosing to stay out of New Jersey?

      </snark>

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the a real story from our local Linux Install Fest. A recent Indian immigrant, who claimed to five year of solid Unix experience for some significant IT project, persuaded us to let him to offer one of the keynotes. It was a bit bloated with jargons but was largely okay...

      My boss was impressed with the "Unix guru" and wanted to offer him an intern before actually hiring him. My boss asked our chief sysadmin (a real Linux guru) to offer him a 2-week non-critical project. My sysadmin was a bit reluctant because he smelled something fishy regarding some of the "Unix guru"'s credential.

      Anyway, the internship was offered as planned. The project was to configure a CVS server for internal usage on a testing machine. The "Unix guru" started asking some very dumb question since Day 1 (along the line of tar usage and how to build standard package from source tarball). On Day 2, he took a copy of "Unix for Dummy" with him. On Day 3, he tried to persuade a junior network admin staff to disable the whole firewall such that he can conduct some "important" setup. The sysadmin could not tolerate anymore and reported to the higher management. The "Unix guru" was kicked out of the building on Day 4...

      It is an isolated event. I meet many good IT guys from India. I also encounter a lot of the bad ones. I think the problem is IT pays very well in India when compared to other industries. Just like the financial industry in developed countries, it attracts a lot of "high flyer wannabes". While these wannabes are attracted to different industries, we can usually identify them by one telltale sign: applying sales pitch in an inappropriate situation....

    13. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by edis · · Score: 1

      Yep, it comes down to quality and consistency of professional knowledge. In those circumstances, your note about, actually, introducing to market pool of cheap and poor skills is insightful. Very similar can be said about flood of "made in china" products - main thing, that makes consumer try it, is damn cheap price. And, unless there is institute, that controls and intercepts risks (my Mac mini has china sticker, but there is little risk), it is risk, that consumer takes on himself in both cases: he is likely to find those offers were just waste of money.

      OTOH, there *is* possibility to hire outsourced professional and benefit from ratio of his level and cost of living at his place of residence! Being located in Eastern part of Europe, I have had experience of successful collaboration with U.S. enterprise. It can work, BUT generally there is much more for it, than supposing you find overseas the same, just cheaper - no, overall you don't. That must have been, what Apple learned, and rather payed for dropping those risks.

      --
      Servant of karma
    14. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by PiercedSoul · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I bought a chevy and it's performance wasn't even close to that of a Lamborghini, so it wasn't worth what I was supposedly saving....

    15. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I work with them on a daily basis. Their grammar is good but the accent varies from interesting (about the same as from another area in america) to very strong.

      The chinese however have atrocious grammar *and* accent problems on top of bad grammar. This last week, one email read something like "I fix problem. It bad file cause." from a guy who has been in the US at least 6 years. The team leads *budget* extra time for these guys because the communication issues represent a real "risk".

      Frequently they have issues with "face" that prevents them from admitting they have a problem unless you approach them very carefully and offer to give them just a few tips (like using bloody helping verbs).

      However, with indians it is mostly speed, cadence, and accents instead of grammar.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    16. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how the students managed to get their work down, despite their lack of language skills? They all shared their work.

      Drove my dad absolutely crazy when he was on sabbatical teaching overseas. He could not stop them from sharing work, and they looked at him as if he were a lunatic when he tried. One or two of the best students would do all the work, and the rest would copy.

    17. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      We found the same thing recently. The Indians were the ones that would straight up LIE to us and then continue to lie when we called them on it. And I'm not talking about serious stuff.. I'm talking about shit like "What's a command that can be used to change Sudo stuff" and the reply would be "pico sudo.conf" - 'visudo' was a total mystery to them. So was.. uh, 'sudoers.'
      The Chinese folks we interviewed would also fluff up their resume a lot.

      The plain ol' Americans? We found very little resume fluff. What we did find is that they were at least honest when we asked them about the experience/skills listed on the resume. "Oh, I see you note Perl on here. How are you with it?" The reply would be "Well, I'm no Larry Wall, but I've written scripts to do X.. Y.."

      They're honest.

    18. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by edis · · Score: 1

      If chevy couldn't get its job done, you could be right.

      --
      Servant of karma
    19. Re:I have run across a good number of ... by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Parent post is spot on. I hear my corporate friends saying the same thing all the time. This isn't to say that American workers are garounteed to be better, but I think that as the majority goes we are in the industry because we like computers and making them work and the majority of Indian workers are in it because "Oh, big America pay much dollars for computer job". Or maybe that's the group we have access to here. I have plenty of American friends that are the same way, they earned a bachelor's degree in comp-sci so they could get paid 'big bucks'. Only to find out that the degree didn't teach them how to do their job. But it seems the ratio is just smaller for us than it appears to be for them.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  48. an employee's market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    From what I hear Bangalore and other India hotspots are quite the employees' markets, much more so than the US is now, and probably not unlike the way things were in the US in the late '90s. That means it's really hard to keep the best employees from taking their training and crossing the street to join your competitor for a 30 percent increase. And all the big US IT outfits are there. Meanwhile you have to make due with a mixed bag of a workforce, some of whom can't really cut the technology (admittedly, this can be true in the US too, but at least you can interview people face to face). On top of that there's the hassle of managing a workforce on the other side of the globe, in a time zone almost opposite to yours.

    So maybe some of that factored into the decision to cut and run. I guess the true story will come out eventually.

    1. Re:an employee's market by awerg · · Score: 1

      Not really, I have been to Bangalore many times and each time I have seen the lines at the job fair. Picture about 200 fresh college graduates standing in line just to be interviewed for the 5-10 positions. I have seen about 15 of these lines just in one morning. There are more employees than jobs.

      --
      -- Andy
  49. But they did say something! by commodoresloat · · Score: 0, Troll

    Steve Jobs stood at the entrance and as each worker left, he said "Thank you! Come again!"

    1. Re:But they did say something! by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      Apu: I have come to make amends, sir. At first, I blamed you for squealing, but then I realized, it was I who wronged you. So I have come to work off my debt. I am at your service. Homer: You're selling what, now?
      Apu: I am selling only the concept of karmic realignment.
      Homer: You can't sell that! Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos.

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  50. No popups with IE by unity · · Score: 1

    I'm using IE with the google tool bar and all those popups I'm reading about in this thread were successfully blocked.

    1. Re:No popups with IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When using IE the popups don't show and the website just proceeds to compromise your entire system.

  51. Package sorting? by daeg · · Score: 0

    Surely there is room for a dozen or so people trying to sort out which John or Sarah gets which package since they all have the same name.

  52. Let the outsourcing stop, no not because of that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is slightly offtopic, but let me explain the state of affairs on Indian Software Services companies. This is not about product companies which operate here.

    I guess I'll be the only Indian in the world who'd wish this outsourcing boom would settle.

    Why?
    Because we have contributed nothing to computing, technically or in research. This is more about the attitude of Indian software services companies. Infosys, TCS and the like, relegating writing software to a BPO styled operation. Cut and Paste mechanics, unhealthy and ugly code. 95% of coders here plain suck. I really hope software dev automation gets a breakthrough, so these guys lose their jobs (for which they are not qualified anyway).
    These companies are surely helping India with jobs, but they have done _nothing_ for computing. (How many Indian Open Source products do you know!)No contribution to open source, and full scale leeching. Meanwhile, revenue is upwards of $2billion, profits $600 million plus. Yet.

    Damn, I dont wanna think about it.

    Btw, this is not a problem with Indian techies, there are so many of them working in research (abroad and in India) who are really good.

  53. When you fire someone that means you have failed by Error27 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Obviously you made a mistake in hiring them in the first place.

    Firing people is bad for morale. It means that people shouldn't trust you. It means that your remaining employees should start looking for a different job.

    Whenever I was a manager, I protected my employees. If they messed up, I coverred for them and helped them fix the problem. I have their back and I expect the same in return.

    I think some people feel that because India is a long way away those employees don't matter. Only a sick kind of employer would feel that way. Once you hire someone you owe it to them to make it work.

  54. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hah, I get paid $355,925.47 and I've got a bigger dick than you. So there!

  55. Re:if quality count by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He or she is posting on Slashdot. In other words: who cares? Activate grammar/spelling Nazi mode when you're not on a website filled with techies that don't write formally for a living. This is stuff that is typed at the spur of the moment upon seeing a silly subject or idiotic post. It's one thing to write documents or letters and a completely different thing to just splash your two cents on an internet forum.

  56. Humour deficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    that should have been

    "I'll say it for you, then: "See how it feels?". See how it feels?"

    See how it feels?

    1. Re:Humour deficient by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      I'd like to say that the Captious Grammarians afflicting Slashdot must be stopped or... Oh no! I used the conditional verb tense in a casual manner!

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  57. Fingers Crossed... by Warlock7 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Let's hope that this is an increasing trend. The outsourcing of tech and support jobs from the US to India has been destroying the industry.

    1. Re:Fingers Crossed... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Let's hope that this is an increasing trend. The outsourcing of tech and support jobs from the US to India has been destroying the industry.

      Tell that to the big-inc lobbyists who have convinced Congress and newpapers that there is a "tech skills shortage" and that your job is going to India or visa workers because you didn't get a 6.0 GPA and they did.

    2. Re:Fingers Crossed... by fmoliveira · · Score: 1

      These corporations sells their products for the entire world. So there is no reason for only the americans to be the only ones with the privilege to work for them. Of course, I believe you may have more talents, as there isnt much point in studying bleeding edge technologies if most of the work available here in the 3rd world (I live in Brazil), is database Java/VB/C# applications. Anything that is not local-law dependant is pirated.

    3. Re:Fingers Crossed... by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. He understands economics the way anyone complaining of outsourcing doesnt.

      The whole world buys American products. America doesnt buy the world's products by using certain types of laws... In time those countries would want things to be fair and implement their own laws. Thus, for the sake of trade, America has to gradually remove the laws and allow trade to flourish, only to stay in the game.

      Its like I have big guns, pointing at others, asking them to buy my products. But I wont buy their products. This can only go on for so long. Microsoft sells to the world, isnt it fair for them to hire from the world too? This is probably more true with IBM.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    4. Re:Fingers Crossed... by Warlock7 · · Score: 2

      I might be missing your point, but it seems that you are saying that US companies are selling their products throughout the world and therefore should offer work to the people of the world because they sell to the world. But then you appear to be saying that the products sold by those companies are pirated in those countries. So, it appears that you are saying that those countries aren't really purchasing the products, they're stealing them? Then, following your logic, I believe, why should those companies offer work in those countries if they make no money there due to piracy?

      I think that I may be a bit confused due to your language skills.

    5. Re:Fingers Crossed... by fmoliveira · · Score: 1

      The piracy is really a big problem here. But there is a lot of software being bought honestly. And hardware, that cannot be pirated.

    6. Re:Fingers Crossed... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      In Brazil, how do sales of Apple products compare to the sale of other manufacturers?

      I haven't heard of any outsourcing to Brazil as of yet.

      There has been a lot of outsourcing of tech support/customer service to India from the US. This has created many headaches with people in the US having to deal with people that do not speak English as their primary language and many of those tech support people speaking with very thick accents, which makes it very difficult for many Americans to understand them.

      As for coding, it seems that many companies are using the "costs less takes longer" approach when they are using outsourced coders. According to recent reports there is apparently a lot of cutting'n'pasting being done and very little testing done by the vast majority of the outsourced coders. Whether this sort of thing will be causing these companies problems in the future remains to be seen. With copyright law in the US the way that it is, you never know if cutting and pasting will end up in a lawsuit over intellectual property rights anymore, the trend seems to be that it will cost the companies money in the future. It's not so much a lack of cutting edge technologies, but rather poor coding practices and carelessness. Now this might not be the case in Brazil, I don't know. I also don't know if this sort of thing will be rectified in India or operations will merely be cancelled due to cost issues.

    7. Re:Fingers Crossed... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1
      America doesnt buy the world's products by using certain types of laws.
      You clearly haven't been to the US. There are more foreign cars on the road in the US than there are domestic ones. The electronics industry, aside from the computer industry, is more or less controlled by the Japanese manufacturers. Quite a bit of music is published by Sony. Clothing is coming from companies which use outsourced labor for the manufacture of textiles. Even the computer industry mostly uses parts which are being manufactured outside of the US. You clearly don't know much about the US economy. The US is the largest customer to the world that there is.

      ...understands economics the way anyone complaining of outsourcing doesnt.
      People that are complaining about outsourcing are doind so because it affects their livelihoods, the qulaity of the work being produced in the tech industry from oustsourcing is declining and the difficulties associated with trying to communicate with people whose primary language is not English becomes very frustrating when it shouldn't be frustrating.
    8. Re:Fingers Crossed... by fmoliveira · · Score: 1

      Macintoshes arent very common here, but they are present. The manufacterers realy get their share here with the notebooks. The unbranded desktops are almost entire from american companies components anyway. Before the merger of HP and Compaq, the netserver navigator, the software that comes with their 32-bit servers, was being mantained here. The coders were treated like animals, and had to be replaced frequently, even with a higher than our local average wage. And they didnt spent too much time in selecting people, because their contract with the american HQ was paid by worked-hours, so they wanted to replace people very fast, anyone with some C experience was enough. And some of the bad code was made by the american HQ too. So, that certainly is not the best that could be done with our workforce.

  58. Oh, but he did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It just didn't work very well for him either.

  59. I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this..is what in-sourcing is.

  60. Re:if quality count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, I've worked with quite a few Russian engineers who had a tendency to omit the article "the" from their sentences. I wonder if that has any bearing on this ad hoc ranking...?

  61. reading comprehension - massive rewards by weierstrass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He didn't say as a result of, he said meanwhile. Meaning CEOs and other execs do reap massive rewards from their companies, but not necessarily as a result of outsourcing, often a cost-saving strategy of dubious effectiveness.

    Mr Jobs just sold $295,000,000 worth of Apple stock.

    In 1992, CEOs held 2 percent of the stock of US corporations, nowadays they own 12 percent. In less than 15 years, CEOs (not including other executives, just CEOs), have 'earned' themselves 10 whole percent of corporate America. If the division of pay were entirely fair and equitable, Steve Jobs and his fellow CEOs must be responsible for exactly one tenth of all the wealth created by anyone at all who works for a large corporation.

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
    1. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by tyrione · · Score: 1
      Hold the Phone. Read your 10-Q next time. He returned those shares to avoid the taxes which would occur. Look it up.

      296 Million in taxes on 4.6 Million shares.

      CEO Restricted Stock Award

      On March 19, 2003, the Companys Board of Directors granted 10 million shares of restricted stock to the Companys CEO that vested on March 19, 2006. The amount of the restricted stock award expensed by the Company was based on the closing market price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant and was amortized on a straight-line basis over the three-year requisite service period.

      Upon vesting during the second quarter of 2006, the restricted stock award was net-share settled such that the Company withheld shares with value equivalent to the CEOs minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income and other employment taxes, and remitted the cash to the appropriate taxing authorities. The total shares withheld of 4.6 million was based on the value of the restricted stock award on the vesting date as determined by the Companys closing stock price of $64.66. The remaining shares net of those withheld were delivered to the Companys CEO. Total payments for the CEOs tax obligations to the taxing authorities were approximately $296 million. The net-share settlement had the effect of share repurchases by the Company as they reduced and retired the number of shares outstanding and did not represent an expense to the Company.

    2. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I'd say Steve Jobs is responsible for 100% of Apple's wealth, considering he created and drove the company and all.. and then, even when he wasn't in charge, it started to go downhill, until he came back and turned it around.

    3. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      He returned those shares to avoid the taxes which would occur. Look it up.

      Steve Jobs sure talks like a Good Liberal, but he sure acts like a fiscal conservative.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by raduf · · Score: 1


          After a certain sum nobody, not even CEOs, can spend any more. They live their lives in confort, maybe luxury, but the extra 10% percent you're talking of is mostly theirs to manage. What changed is that a bigger part of the companies is owned by the people who run it, and not by anonymous investors. That is not a bad thing. So what if Gates has 200 bilions and not 50? Do you really think after the first 100 milions or so it changes his lifestyle any more? What it means is that a smart guy gets to manage more of the world's wealth. And i personally wish him a long and productive life.

    5. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Some of us fiscally conservative liberals see that as a false dichotomy.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    6. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Some of us fiscally conservative liberals see that as a false dichotomy

      Are you being humorous or is there a way to be a liberal without relying on taxation?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Yes to both.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    8. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by Trillan · · Score: 1
      the division of pay were entirely fair and equitable, Steve Jobs and his fellow CEOs must be responsible for exactly one tenth of all the wealth created by anyone at all who works for a large corporation.

      I see where you're going, but buying the other 90% of stock for Mr. Jobs would be very expensive.

    9. Re:reading comprehension - massive rewards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly do you think the word "liberal" means?

      liberal
      adjective

      1 open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values : they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people.
        favorable to or respectful of individual rights and freedoms : liberal citizenship laws.
        (in a political context) favoring maximum individual liberty in political and social reform : a liberal democratic state.
        ( Liberal) of or characteristic of Liberals or a Liberal Party.
        ( Liberal) (in the UK) of or relating to the Liberal Democrat Party : the Liberal leader.

  62. Not surprising by AmoHongos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let this be a lesson to anyone who thinks Apple is somehow different, hipper, or cooler than the average multinational corporation. They think with their bottom line too.

    1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think one point of the story is that Apple has indeed just done something different from its competitors. Whether that is hipper or cooler is another matter.

    2. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think this is proof positive that Apple "Thinks Different" than the other tired masses of vanilla box builders that don't give a damn about the end user experience. At least if I need to call Apple's tech support (which I haven't needed to do since OS X was released back in 2000) I'll be assured of speaking with someone that can actually speak my native tongue and has a clue when dealing with me.

      Ever called Dell support? Award winning....my a55.

    3. Re:Not surprising by ghoul · · Score: 1

      So what language do you speak? Redneck? Coz if you speak English you have a better chance of understanding an Indian Accent than an Okie accent

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This coming from a genius that spells "because" as "coz". :P

  63. As a current Apple phone rep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a current Apple phone rep, I have to say that most of the customers I've talked to that have had -any- contact with the Bangalore workers were not terribly bimpressed by them.

    Given the general tendency of older customers, more affluent customers and students of all ages to be Apple customers, I'm not surprised they'd rather talk to someone who has a name they can pronounce in a city they have heard of.

    1. Re:As a current Apple phone rep by saihung · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you're talking about. All of the Indian call reps that I call in Bangalore are actually named Cindy and live in Boise.

    2. Re:As a current Apple phone rep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol....
      yeah!!!

  64. New phrase by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You've been iSourced!"

    1. Re:New phrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to call IBM Indian Business Machines.

  65. fuck you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my dog raped your momma nine months before you were born

  66. Just like a number? by tibman · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you think a big company is bad about treating you like a number, join the Army.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    1. Re:Just like a number? by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      god damn right. ive known a few enlisted men and women, a number indeed.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    2. Re:Just like a number? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      My relative who was in the Air Force said... Join the air force. They treat you like a number but they also treat you like a person unlike the Army where they just treat you like a number.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:Just like a number? by tibman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I absolutely agree with that. Sometimes i'd envy those Airforce guys. They'd get chinook'd anywhere they wanted to go and were always standing around having fun. But i'm drawn to that regimented quasi-machine spirit of the Army. The Marines are even more hardcore on this front.. but too much for me. The AirForce were always on the top of "who's cool" until is was mission time. Then is was the Army. We never had to discuss how it was to be done. The commander says GO!.. we go. No one is complaining or saying it's not fair or trying to wiggle out of it. Marine Corp officers are generally better than most Army ones in my opinion. Well.. maybe not better, but less political and more down to business (better in my view). But you are more right than you know, the AirForce is where it's at if you want to still be "you".

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    4. Re:Just like a number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > god damn right. ive known a few enlisted men and women, a number indeed.

      Heh - that's all you are to us, too:

      http://cryptome.org/mil-dead-iqw.htm

    5. Re:Just like a number? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Heh - that's all you are to us, too:

      http://cryptome.org/mil-dead-iqw.htm


      Actually that page contains links to the names and death reasons of soldiers...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    6. Re:Just like a number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I absolutely agree with that. Sometimes i'd envy those Airforce guys. They'd get chinook'd anywhere they wanted to go and were always standing around having fun.


      Hell, when I was a Spec4 I was stationed at Lowry AFB for awhile (now closed), and E-4s in the Air Force have better housing than Army E-7s. I was there for training, and after hours you'd go to their rec center and you could do all manner of crazy crap. In the army I was looking for a decent martial arts class at Fort Devens (you'd think it'd be easy finding martial arts on a military base) and nada. At Lowery they were teaching taekwondo, jiujitsu, judo and ninjitsu at different times. And don't even get me started on how awesome their chow hall was.

      The Marines are even more hardcore on this front.. but too much for me.


      Though I'm glad I didn't enlist in the Marines, I do envy their "no bullshit" attitude and the fact that the mass majority of their officers are not politically driven, but task driven. They just seemed to be more "straight-up" about things instead of worried about the next OER/EER.

      But you are more right than you know, the AirForce is where it's at if you want to still be "you".


      Indeed. It seems like the service where you can still act like you have a life.. though I've heard ominous rumblings that the Air Force are now sending airmen through some sort of abbreviated army type training (more marksmanship, group tactics, and a mini-FTX).

      I can't bitch too much about the army though, I had a great MOS (component level electronics tech who works on Intel gathering equipment), and the GI bill paid my way through school.
    7. Re:Just like a number? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Actually, having done both, I think that a large corporation is worse. In the Army, the leadership system is designed so that every person has someone above them, who (theoretically) is tasked with basically taking care of them. That's not the case in a lot of "matrix organized" corporations. I've worked in places where it was never clear to me who my direct superior was, and I had half a dozen different managers, none of whom were really interested in my success or failure. (Heck, at some places I never even met my direct manager in the entire time I worked there.)

      The Army is the ultimate top-down organization: go two levels or more above wherever you are, and you're just a number, but at least the people right above you will probably know who you are. If you have a problem, the chain of command is pretty obvious, both up and down; to me, that's always been comforting. I always knew exactly who my superiors were, and who I was responsible for.

      YMMV, obviously; the Army is a huge organization and I'm sure there are as many bad officers in it as there are bad managers in any corporation, but in general I thought that people in the military took their leadership responsibilies much more seriously than their corporate counterparts, or at least that's been my experience so far.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    8. Re:Just like a number? by tibman · · Score: 1

      I never really thought about it that way. I guess that's something the Army has over another civilian organization. The general comradery. You know that most of the guys around you, up and down, care for your general well-being as well as your ability to perfom. You're spot on about the leadership too. They take their jobs very seriously. On the otherside of the coin though; mistakes in the Army, even small ones, measure in lives.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    9. Re:Just like a number? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Actually that page contains links to the names and death reasons of soldiers...

      Actually I think that was probably his point...

  67. no comfort by twitter · · Score: 4, Funny
    Its hard to find programmers in India with Mac OS x experiance, or even *nix experiance.

    There's no such thing as job security through obscurity.

    It's a joke, laugh.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:no comfort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know that I feel comfortable about you making "jokes" in an article that involves India.

  68. Apple wanted to stay in Cupertino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Here is my 2 bit theory.

    Steve wanted to stay in Cupertino. If you listen to the town meeting from a month or so ago it is clear that getting the land for the new campus was not a sure thing. Estimates are that Apple paid 500 million for the land for the new campus. India was probably more of a contingency if they couldn't expand in Cupertino. Once that deal went though, then they needed to back out so as not to stretch themselves too thin.

    It would look pretty silly spending 0.5 billion on a new campus and then have no one to fill it with.

    1. Re:Apple wanted to stay in Cupertino by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " India was probably more of a contingency if they couldn't expand in Cupertino."

      I don't think it's related to the expansion: the expanded campus won't be ready for a few years, so cancelling the plans in India now leaves a big gap.

      Steve Jobs won't settle for quickly erected generic office space. That would be wildly out of character for the guy who had I. M. Pei design a floating staircase for NeXT headquarters, and who built that whole glass cube Apple store thing on 5th Ave.

      It'll probably be 18 months before he signs off on a design by some 'name' architect. (For the sake of Apple's employees' vision, I hope it's not some blindingly reflective (yet old hat and ultimately boring) titanium-sheet Frank Gehry design.) It'll probably be another 6-12 months before the foundations are laid.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    2. Re:Apple wanted to stay in Cupertino by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      India was probably more of a contingency if they couldn't expand in Cupertino

      A hundred or so people in India is not anywhere close to a "contingency" for the corporate offices of a multi-billion dollar international company. Apple probably has more people than that in their accounting department alone.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    3. Re:Apple wanted to stay in Cupertino by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      It wasn't $500 million. it was about $50 million.

      And Apple has a growing call center facility near Sacramento, CA - real estate is a hell of a lot cheaper up there.

      Failing that, Apple could build a huge facility in North Dakota, as many biotech & research firms are. Cheap real estate (like, REAL cheap) and an educated workforce. (anyone that thinks otherwise is clueless about the midwest)

      Apple doesn't need to send a fucking thing to India. And the Indians, who think that the world revolves around them, are pissed off.

  69. Do you play poker? by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

    Ever hear of a bluff?

  70. $800 = 10x Minimum wage in India by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

    ... So considering in Canada $8/hr ($1280/mo)is the highest minimum wage, your $732/week is about 2x more than minimum wage.

    So in short I'd say he has you beat by a factor of 4.

    Let us know when you start making $2928/week, and then maybe the joke won't be on you. ;-)

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    1. Re:$800 = 10x Minimum wage in India by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      As someone else pointed out, it's a question of how much you can buy, not how much you make in absolute terms. I'd rather earn $70,000/year in San Antonio than $100,000/year in San Francisco. Given those two options, you'd live far more comfortably in San Antonio (except for the heat, of course).

      And earning 10x minimum wage in India may or may not be something to write home about if minimum wage is still abject poverty. Peanuts is still peanuts even if you're making 10x as many peanuts as the worst off in a poor country. I recently lived in Mexico where the minimum wage is about US$3.70/day. I honestly don't know how people that make that much live, even in Mexico. If I had been making 10 times that (US$37.00/day), it still would have sucked and been nearly impossible to live even remotely comfortably in Mexico, much less with a family.

      Which just goes to show that "multiples of minimum wage" is not a valid way to compare salaries from country to country.

    2. Re:$800 = 10x Minimum wage in India by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > As someone else pointed out, it's a question of how much you can buy, not how much you make in absolute terms.

      --This was covered extensively in Mark Twain's " A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court ".

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  71. To a certain extent it is by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    anywhere you've got poor, dumb people having lots of kids, you'll have corporations moving jobs there. If you want to improve things for the working man/woman, get the poor ones to stop breeding execesively. But it's taboo to sugest you shouldn't be allowed to have kids just because you can't afford them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  72. Obligatory Apu by objekt · · Score: 1

    Thank you! Come again!

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  73. Re:When you fire someone that means you have faile by Compuser · · Score: 1

    In this case, firing foreign developers might be good
    for morale in the US. Makes people feel more secure.

  74. Re:Let the outsourcing stop, no not because of tha by mnmn · · Score: 1

    I agree.

    I'm not from India, I'm from Pakistan. But...

    There are outsourcing companies on those regions which aim just to get contracts signed, and focus much less on who they hire. The cultural and timezone differences will always exist, but I've known tonnes of worthless techies involved in the outsourcing business. The better ones just find their way out, head for the west themselves and find work.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  75. Does anyone else smell piracy concerns ? by d2v · · Score: 1

    I think Apple got scared of having their software pirated in India, especially due to leakage of source code. Having on same hardware specs as Windows only aggrevates the concern. I wonder how no one else has posted this before !

  76. Re:Let the outsourcing stop, no not because of tha by research_cs · · Score: 1

    Yes, you are right. Innovation is the key and Indian companies have tremendously failed at it. I also agree with the point of Open Source Projects coming from Indians (I am not sure about the involvement of these techies in such projects though; in other words, it would be interesting to find out the statistics of number of Indian techies involved in open source projects). Considering that open source offers so many opportunities for everybody to work upon, its really a shame to see nada products... P.S. You are not the only Indian.

  77. Perhaps, Mr Godwin, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Aryans" were already there...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_invasion_theory

  78. Re:$40 ( not money cost of living matters ) by Dj-Zer0 · · Score: 1

    Guys you can't talk about the $ values comparisons between countries, you need to talk about cost of living, i assume making about $800 per month in india is about making 3000-4000 in USA, because i am sure you rent for an apartment in india isnt $800 a month

    --
    http://iesucks.org
  79. why is that racist? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

    I never understood why this was a racial slur towards Native Americans, I mean it was the white man that gave them a bunch of land treaties and then broke all of them...

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    1. Re:why is that racist? by foo12 · · Score: 1
  80. regarding quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone posted a comment that said "the quality of the average American IT worker is far better than those from India."

    This is a moot point. The quality of an average American sweeper or construction worker might be far better than the comparable Mexican's for all I know/care, but no one cares about your quality or better sweeping skills when you demand $50 an hour to wash my sink, health insurance to take care of your diabetic fat ass, severance pay, hard working conditions allowance, and various other allowances. And on top of all this, you refuse to attend school or get trained in newer skills.

    The high end management tasks are still handled in the US, although they are increasingly being outsourced in the stockholders' interest. Think about it from a stockholder's point of view. Would you want to invest your $$$ in a company that pays its lowest workers $60 an hour for work that doesn't demand a lot of quality or warrant the demanded benefits? Would you want to invest in a non globally competitive stock?

    And I am surprised people are talking crap about India's education system. Instead of commenting on that, I am just going to laugh at their face.

    Also, when did Apple become a software bastion? It has always been a failure at mass market commoditization, the iPod notwithstanding. The reason they pulled out could just be that Steve Jobs is making another one of his harsh business decisions. Read "The Fire in the Valley".

    I am done with the ignorance.

    1. Re:regarding quality by cryophan · · Score: 1

      some traitor wrote" This is a moot point. The quality of an average American sweeper or construction worker might be far better than the comparable Mexican's for all I know/care, but no one cares about your quality or better sweeping skills when you demand $50 an hour to wash my sink, health insurance to take care of your diabetic fat ass, severance pay, hard working conditions allowance, and various other allowances. And on top of all this, you refuse to attend school or get trained in newer skills Aren't you a nasty little traitor to your fellow Amwerican citizen? I am assuming you are american. I can hardly that europeans have been so propagandized against the working person as to make the sort of evil comments you made. You have certainly internalized the overclass point of view by demonizing your fellow working American instead of realizing where the true evil lies--at the top. The overclass has successfully shaped the American culture to create evil little traitors like you. I sure hope nothing happens to you, like, say, getting big fat tumor in your brain, completely inoperative. Well, maybe that would be OK. After all, we do execute murderers. So maybe we should indict and try for treason little turncoats like you. But in truth, it is your overclass masters who should pay for creating you.

  81. Quite the opposite is true by hagbard5235 · · Score: 1

    I've noticed in the last few years you simply can't get high quality cheap talent in India. Don't get me wrong, there's still a lot of high quality talent in India, but it's expensive. And you can still get cheap, but the people you get cheap tend not to be very good at all. Things are basically evening out.

  82. Logic doesn't work here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are attempting to come up with a logical reason for Apple's action, because you still have the idea that executives at companies must have some reason for the things they do. But they don't. In many cases, they do things out of pure whim.

    The other possibility is a turf war. Probably the VP who started up the Indian office was on top, but then a few months later he wasn't and the new guy shut it down to "implement his own ideas".

    I've worked in a company that had a reorg that divided projects under either the domestic sales VP or the international sales VP. But our project had both domestic and international customers. So we got put under international... and our VP told our domestic customers that we wouldn't do any more work for them beyond current contracts. Several million down the tubes because one prick wouldn't let another prick get revenue credits off "his" project.

    There are plenty of war stories I could tell; everyone has their own. The point is, most executives are stupid or greedy or both. The execs at the very top seem to want to surround themselves with idiots, probably so as to lessen the competition for the top exec who is raiding the company for every last dollar he can squeeze. Then he moves on to the next company to suck dry.

    That's why these execs act like idiot puppeteers, fighting over which string gets pulled. We're just the puppets, getting jerked around.

  83. Re:Excellent post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +++++ Please MOD parent up. Could NOT have said it any better if I had tried. :0) Am NOT an american by birth.. .and I agree with ever word you said... -Anon

  84. Failure to take into account... by kaiwai · · Score: 1

    The fact that India subsidises Gas, Petrol and Kerosine; so you may get $800 per month, but a good portion of your cost of living is being subsidised.

    As for the amount, one has to look at the cost of living, and the likes; in New Zealand, the minimum wage is NZ$9.50 per hour; I'm on $11.20 per hour, in the average week, I'm paid around NZ$320-370 (with tax taken off); if one converted NZ dollars to US, I would be considered 'poor' but given the low cost in living in NZ; rent being $100 per week, power, $20 per week etc. one can easily have $120-150 left at the end of each week.

  85. Welcome to Farm Shoring by yhbrn · · Score: 2, Informative

    A recent trend is for companies to get out of cheap engineering off shoring deals and move the jobs back to the US in rural areas--called Farm Shoring. The cultural differences are obvious to anyone who has used an India off shored help desk. The work force targeted in the US is rural non-technical people who are being trained to do low level support. Expect a small return to computer science majors at rural colleges. India and other places are countering by trying to teach their workers more of the US culture including language variations such as 'Texan', New Yorker, the South etc by holding dialect classes where their students practice sounding like different parts of the US.

    1. Re:Welcome to Farm Shoring by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's Product Activation line is an example of what outsourced phone contacts should be like.

      I have never once had trouble understanding any of their language, ever -- while it is clear that they are not Americans (British accent with slight lisps in distinctive places makes me think they're probably Indian) but they're very communicative. Either MS hires upper class people, or trains them better, I don't know. But, out of 50+ activation calls, I've never had a problem.

      Dell tech support, on the other hand, is aweful. HP tech support has been hit or miss -- I've gotten a woman with a distinctly American name and distinctly Southern accent, and I've gotten Prapeek from Calcutta who I had a lot of difficulty communicating an advanced RA exchange billing authorization to.

      I do think that it's a good thing for us to send these jobs to rural areas, though. This will ultimately improve the economy for everyone involved, and lead to increased customer loyalty and satisfaction as well. Granted, I have a harder time understanding some southerners than the MS people, so it's not a perfect solution. But it's a step in the right direction.

    2. Re:Welcome to Farm Shoring by nsayer · · Score: 1
      But, out of 50+ activation calls, I've never had a problem.

      The fact that you've had to make 50+ calls is the problem.

      OT, yes, but it had to be said.

    3. Re:Welcome to Farm Shoring by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      True. Iowa and Indiana both are booming in IT jobs.

      Texas is dirt cheap and there are plenty of great schools with a good workforce. I maybe moving to Dallas within a year or perhaps Austin.

      Austin sed to be very expensive to live during the .com high but since the outsourcing trend started, prices for homes fell quit alot and many companies are coming back and hiring more people.

    4. Re:Welcome to Farm Shoring by jax9999 · · Score: 1

      Google convergys ron weber, ict etc etc... those "microsoft" and "dell" technicians probably sit next to each other

    5. Re:Welcome to Farm Shoring by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Activation calls on behalf of customers.

      'nuff said.

    6. Re:Welcome to Farm Shoring by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Even so, I stand by my comment.

  86. You mean you're FULL of ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on! You vist your slum by train - ON TOP OF - and pass as many cows in the road as you do 4-wheeled cars, side-stepping sewer in the streets all the while. That's not a country, that's a slum!

  87. Re:Let the outsourcing stop, no not because of tha by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

    I sure wish my mod points hadn't expired, because the parent hit the nail on the head. I, too, know the absolutely horrible quality that comes from the countries to which we outsource. It's costing us more than just lost productivity; it's pissing off US emplyees who have to deal with the clueless outsourcees...

  88. Re:When you fire someone that means you have faile by IcePop456 · · Score: 2

    Actually, I think you have it completely wrong. Firing poor bad employees shows that you know what is going on and will not tolerate BS. More often than not, the complaints I hear from people are almost always do to a boss who will not act firmly. This means protecting good employees and FIRING the ones who are not up to par. Yeah you can spin it as the managers fault for hiring the person, but if you wanted to avoid that, you'd still have an idiot working with you. I enjoy my free time and therefore do not want to have to fix all their crap. Been there, done that. People lie, cheat, and steal, but once you figure it out, FIX THE SITUATION!

  89. You clearly live in California by moultano · · Score: 1

    Anyone making $120k/year can afford some of the nicer houses in any midwestern city.

    1. Re:You clearly live in California by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

      Anyone making $120k/year can afford some of the nicer houses in any midwestern city.

      In some places you could afford a whole midwestern town :)

      Seriously, I recently checked house prices in my home town... $50K for a three bedroom house on an acre. Same thing in my current neighborhood would sell for $900K and only have an 8,000 sq.ft. lot.

      Don't know how young people can still afford to move to CA.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
  90. Maybe that's your own damned fault? by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't want to be living one mortgage payment from being out on the street, DON'T! Learn to live within your means. Put 25% of your money into your retirement account. Buy a house where you can pay your mortgage payment and then some, or rent a place you can afford. Drive a late model auto. Don't spend $4,000 a year on the latest tech toys. Bring your lunch to work instead of eating out all the time.

    EXCERCISE SOME FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY! If you make $120,000 a year and are one mortgage payment away from being on the street, it's because you're being stupid with your money.

    1. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by wiggles · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If you make $120,000 a year and are one mortgage payment away from being on the street, it's because you're being stupid with your money.

      Or, you live in California.
    2. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree with renting. I rent an apartment 1 mile away from work and it's great. I could care less about owning a home at this point in my life. I also drive a 1984 Honda Prelude. Given these choices, I'm able to save over 50% of my income in retirement and non-retirement accounts and I'm only 24.

      The nice thing is, I have money leftover that I can spend $4,000/year on the latest tech toys ;) Not that I'm likely to spend that much.

    3. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by mellon · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of geeks in Silicon Valley are learning this the hard way. Personally, when my holding costs for my house in San Francisco went to about 50% of my income, I freaked. Happily, I'm living in Tucson now -a much cheaper neighborhood. :') But it's hard to get geek jobs here, or so I hear - I'm still working the same job in California.

    4. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by arivanov · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ahem. Seconded

      There are some problems though.

      95+% of the people around you do not. They think that you are crazy. In some jobs sectors it is consirered to be essential to maintain some "class" and it may be very detrimental to your career to be different. Most of banking, finances and consluttancies are angaged in an endless penis measurement contest and it takes some guts and thinking to avoid getting into it or maintain financial discipline. This is especially true if you are a few steps above the bottom of the corporate ladder, high enough for the penis measurement to be in full swing, but too low to have the finances to afford it.

      So as a matter of fact, the culture of the industry sector and the employer need to be taken into account when looking at a salary. 50Kpounds in a "plain IT" or "plain Telecoms" in old Blighty are a reasonable amount of money. 50Kpounds in the banking industry or most consluttancies are peanuts. You will either have to stay one payment away from being thrown out onto the street or you will have to cut somewhere on the "perceived class". In the latter case you essentially volunatrily put yourself on the list of the "first ones to go when the times get tough".

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    5. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by lamarhornet · · Score: 1

      That's a very asinine and presumptuous comment to make. I spend a lot more than that a year on tech, but I get by. Bottom line: This is about apple being cheap by using sub-grade foreign devolpers, not if I buy a macbook and can't pay the bills.

    6. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Wiseleo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Buy a property.

      If someone explained to me that owning a property is basically renting for free, I would have done that in 1999.

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
    7. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't think I could squeeze my mortgage, toys, girlfriends, cars, motorcycles, and lawnmowers into a measly $120k/yr. Certainly, I'd be below the poverty level in the USA.

      Povertly level after paying almost $40k in taxes! We need the Fair Tax ahref=http://fairtax.org/rel=url2html-3875http://f airtax.org/>

      Oh, that's right, I made all my money in 2000 and never need work again. Some of the toys are getting old. My cars are all over 5 years old! The shame!

    8. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a property.

      If someone explained to me that owning a property is basically renting for free, I would have done that in 1999.


      It is unlikely that he can buy a property one mile from work.

      Maybe he can afford something 30 minutes from work.. Does that commute time make it worthwhile? He'd probably need to upgade that '84 Civic, etc. And if the employer closes up shop he may have to move..

    9. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad that buying property is absolutely nothing like renting for free. But if you believe that, I've got some dot-com stock to sell you.

    10. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      If you make $120,000 a year and are one mortgage payment away from being on the street, it's because you're being stupid with your money.

      I disagree. If you make $120,000 a year and are one mortgage payment away from being on the street, it's because you're being *SO* stupid with your money that you *DESERVE TO* and *MUST* lose it.

    11. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Mortgage payments are almost the same as rent - same ballpark. The problem is that the real estate is artificially overpriced because no one is interested in building affordable housing in good school-districts (not for 1/3 of your monthly income, but for 1/10) out of the fear that your maid will move in to the building next to yours.

      In short: that 1/3 + 1/3 for uncle sam = 2/3 of your salary is the amount you cannot economize on even if you are super-frugal. After spending max allowed by the gvt $12-15G a year towards your serene 401k retirement in a mobile home (when you will be able to see beatiful stars in the skies without leaving your bedroom through the holes in the ceiling), 1/6 of your 6-digit salary (slightly more than $1000 a month) is left to pay for all your family needs.

      OT: In dot-com times IT managers of San Jose were quitting their jobs to baby-sit, because they could not afford ridiculous salaries for baby-sitters.

      Middle class is evaporating faster that you can spell "laissez faire". Soon thriving for a decent living will be as futile as dreaming of becoming $.50 or Julia Roberts. Welcome to the ranks of modern days proletariat. That is what we are, biotech ants, system admins, "software architects" - proletariat of XXI centuries.

      No wonder the anguish and anxiety of younger generation results in absurd protests via copyright infringement and hacking whatever they can hack (in as much as I hate stealing, illegal downloaders are sign of the times).

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    12. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Get married, get yourself 2 kids of "good school district" age, divorce, get married again, son, and then talk to me.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    13. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by mkcmkc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Living in California is being stupid with your money...

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    14. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Owning a house provides you protection from future inflation.
      My mother's house payment went from 2 weeks pay to 3 days pay over the course of 15 years.
      My house payment has remained about $700 while rent for a similar quality apartment has gone from $750 to $1100. In 4 more years, it will be paid off and my rent will drop to $300 per month (taxes- currently about $275 per month).

      This is all provided you don't move.

      But houses are not free. You rent from the government (property taxes).
      And you have to cover all repairs and upgrades.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    15. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by castoridae · · Score: 1

      Um, how is owning a property "renting for free"? Mortgage, all utilities (in my state, landlords have to pay water & sewer bills), home repairs, insurance, property tax... Being a landlord is a very low-margin business. Sure, if you own, then any of those (low-margin) profits (and, if you operate correctly some tax benefits) belong to you, but I would definitely not equate this to free in any circumstances.

      And even that small profit (and maybe somewhat larger tax savings) comes with a price - as a renter, it's easy to pick up and move at the end of each lease. Find a better deal, a new neighborhood. As an owner, your asset (and home) are not very liquid and become much less so when the market is cool. I could go on about the headaches of home maintenance, etc., but I think this makes my point.

      I am a homeowner (and a landlord), and I'm not bitter. Just a realist. No, really! :-)

    16. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Properties less than one mile from work cost 600k to 700k right now. so.... yeah, renting is about a quarter of the cost at this point of any home payment. And I truly don't believe these homes are worth that much, it's just a result of the 250% increase in housing prices in the last 5 years. It will crash, and it will be BAD! Then I might consider buying.

      It's a major employer, a national laboratory. Given how politics change, it could be closed down on a whim. I'd like to see how those people will pay off their $700k morgatges when they loose their job. Good luck selling if you had to move.

    17. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      One thing you assume though is that house prices will always match or beat inflation. Right now, after a 200% price increase, I'm guessing they could fall for a very long time.

    18. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I guess wiseleo isn't that wise after all...

    19. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      How the hell is this insightful?

      If I could go to to work where housing was affordable, I would. The problem is, I live where the cost of living is beyond rediculous because that's where the jobs are. So far, I have heard nothing about a big tech boom looming on the horizon for Montana or freakin Wyoming. These are about the last places in America where I can live for a year for less than what it takes to run the whole Bolivian Government for a month.

      I guess I could cut back on calories. My family ought to get by with a combined total of 5000-a-day. And what about those expensive tuition payments my kids will need? I say, don't send them to school; that's just playing into the "Man's" hands. And use public transportation. The 10-mile commute to where I work takes 1.75 hours (No, I am not kidding). The nearly 4 hours sitting on the bus each day might be used to reflect on how fat and wasteful we are in America.

      I live in Irvine (Southern California). The absolute bottom of the market here is $600K for a 30-year-old hovel. The only people who are not a mortage payment away from the street are those who bought 10 years ago or have their place paid off. $120K here is the bare minimum and that will just allow you to rent. Forget about getting into a home.

      I would have rated your comment "-2 Pious Little Biaatch"

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    20. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, do go and fuck yourself. Keep bitching about the hard times out in CA. You dipshits put Arnold in office, now you deal with your own fucking problems. With that kind of salary you should grow a couple and do something about it. Poor baby, making 10k a month. Fucking whiny little turd. Get a clue. Your post should be rated "-2: whiny little biznitch".

    21. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      We are fairly likely to see inflation over 10% in the next decade for multiple reasons.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    22. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Real estate market is fueled by the tax cuts at the upper brackets. 40 percent of the home sales last year was for second homes. The wealthy are pouring their lovely new tax cuts into property, driving up the prices and making it seem like a bull market.

      After the Bush party, there will come tax increases to at least pre-Bush levels to try to stop the debt hemmorage. The real estate market will be drained of all that lovely tax cut moola, and will crash like like its 1929. This is not the time to buy a house. And the prices are too high in any case. People can't afford this.

      (Senor Commander Taco, why is the single quote key bringing up a search box? Id like to type one, please.)

    23. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Buran · · Score: 1

      Drive a late model auto.

      Don't you mean "Don't drive a late model auto"? Seems like you're suggesting "always drive a new or nearly-new car". To clarify -- are you trying to say "buy a used car that's been checked by a mechanic, at least a year or two old so someone else ate the depreciation"?

      I drive a six-year-old VW Golf. I've driven it for six years. I chose carefully when I was buying a new vehicle, and I've got a very practical but very driveable (VW means it when they say they design for drivers) vehicle that I wouldn't give up even if I weren't a VW fanatic. It's very fuel-efficient, carries lots of stuff, has four doors foreasy access, and looks real nice. What do I need to waste money on a new car for? I spend a bit on customizing it but that's far less costly than totally replacing my car every 2-4 years like some people do.

    24. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second richest man in the world lives in a house he paid $30,000 for.
      And he is in the "banking, finance" culture. He still commands a lot of
      respect. What gets you ahead is capability, not "class".

    25. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by sharkman67 · · Score: 1

      Or Connecticut

    26. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by raehl · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, all the WalMart employees commute from Nevada?

    27. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      Actually,

      They live in mobile home parks around Santa Ana, which is a place most discriminating people will seldom venture.

      Why do people have a hard time understanding just how insanely expensive it is to get by in Southern California? Believe me. I'd be the first to pack up and leave if there was a job waiting for me at the detination. Unfortunately, software development tends to cluster around expensive communities or communities that will soon become expensive.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    28. Re:Maybe that's your own damned fault? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the market conditions. While in general that might be good advice, if you're living in a location where prices are heavily inflated, it might be terrible advice instead.

      Right now, for example, the housing markets in the DC area are vastly overinflated, and in the midst of a contraction. You'd be insane to buy a first home now, unless you had an inside track and were getting a below-"market" deal.

      All that would happen is that you'd end up with a mortgage over the next 10, 20, or 30 years that was far more than the property would ever be worth (barring another inflationary period). So in the end, you could lose a lot of money versus renting over the same period. (Because rents might decrease during the contraction, while your mortgage payments wouldn't.)

      Now, if you're in a place where the housing market is relatively stable or inflating, then it makes sense to buy a home instead of rent. It's basically "renting for free," but in addition, you can deduct the mortgage payments from your taxes, which if you're single can be really significant.

      The problem for many young people, myself included, is that owning a property means tying yourself into a particular area, and that's a big step if you're not sure where you want to live for a while.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  91. Were Employees Stealing Trade Secrets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    and selling them to Microsoft?

    Indian society is one of the most porous when considering trade secrets - information gets around. I don't see how Apple could hope to maintain any security whatsoever with Microsoft so highly invested in Bangalore. Every punjabi and his dog within 50 miles would be selling Apple confidential docs to Microsoft.

    1. Re:Were Employees Stealing Trade Secrets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ? Punjab is in on the northern end of the country, Bangalore is closer to the southern tip. If you are going to put down a group of people based on their geography, at least get that geography right!

  92. I hate high-level jobs. by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 4, Informative
    On May 15, Apple officials addressed us and were highly appreciative of the workforce and the task it would execute in India. I wonder why they never said anything even then," said another fired employee.

    Because employees would react. If they said "we're thinking about closing" or "things aren't working out as expected" then at least a few employees would just bail, or worse. No company wants that -- if there is a chance to salvage the situation, then they would prefer the employees never even knew how close they came to being laid off. Especially if a few employees leaving could damage the potential turnaround. And if there is no chance to salvage the situation, then they want those employees to still be around long enough to finish whatever needs finishing.

    I'm not suggesting that how corporations treat employees is good. I'm just telling you what the thinking is. In fact, I hated that thinking so much that I quit my first high-level job. I'd been a manager of Web teams for most of my career. I got a job with Sabeer Bhatia (the Hotmail guy), and he brought me on as a Director. I sat in all/most of the upper-management meetings. I heard all sorts of private discussions, not meant for the rest of the employees. I knew when the product had serious issues that would hurt our funding. I knew when there was trouble with an investor. I knew when the management team was in conflict. It was never a good idea to let employees in on the issues. I learned that quickly. The first few times there were issues, I took my team to lunch and let them know. You cannot believe the fallout, swift and sure. I grew to hate it. I had to lie to employees when they would ask about rumors. I was supposed to have been doing that all along, anyway (well, maybe "lying" is too harsh because I'm bitter about it, I'm sure a more seasoned person would have simply said "none of your business" to every single rumor or TMI kind of question -- but for me, that just gets uncomfortable when you know the person has a family and will be out of work in a month). Eventually I quit. At my next job, the hiring manager was curious why I was going for a job as a manager of a small team when I was clearly moving up into Director & VP level work. I realized I'd rather be with the rest of the employees, not knowing about the sheer volumes of crap that hit the fan daily.

    As I get older, I get better at things, of course. I'm self-employed now, and I have a subcontractor for the times when the work is too plentiful. If I don't have work for the subcontractor, I just say so. If he ends his business relationship with me due to it, I'll deal with that. I try not to make too big a deal out of anything. But I'm also not running a company with 10,000 employees. If things go bad for me, the impact is tiny.

    1. Re:I hate high-level jobs. by danimrich · · Score: 1

      Because employees would react. If they said "we're thinking about closing" or "things aren't working out as expected" then at least a few employees would just bail, or worse. No company wants that -- if there is a chance to salvage the situation, then they would prefer the employees never even knew how close they came to being laid off. Especially if a few employees leaving could damage the potential turnaround. And if there is no chance to salvage the situation, then they want those employees to still be around long enough to finish whatever needs finishing. Rockstar Games recently closed one of their studios. Basically, when the employees came to work one day they were met by security guards-it is unclear whether they were even allowed to go to their desks. The rationale behind this is that the employees are more likely to steal code and dev kits if they know they're going to be laid off anyway. (To Rockstar's credit-they respected the local laws regarding layoffs and the employees got paid for a couple of weeks more.)

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    2. Re:I hate high-level jobs. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      You sound like a compassionate person... but, you're not helping anyone by hiding your head in the sand. Sorry to be harsh. You have the ability to be a high-level director of operations for tens/hundreds of employed individuals, yet you avoid it actively because you don't want to feel guilty when hard decisions have to be made.

      Suck it up! Be honest! Tell all the people who look up to you for leadership that you have a job to do and sometimes it's not easy and that you must be impartial.... and as objective as you can be... being human and all, with emotions and stuff...

      They will either understand that you have to do what you have to do and that it's business... not personal, or they won't and there's nothing you could ever do to improve their understanding of abstract organizational mechanics.

      If they do understand, then they will also appreciate your honesty and management style. You will gain loyalty on that day. They will goof off occasionally but when you ask them to get shit done... they'll do it with gusto.

      Remember also that you have the upper hand with your boss/es... you control a big portion of their operating budget... that is substantial power. If you really know what you're doing.. tell them so, and tell them to go fsck themselves when they get in the way of good management... executives never make good managers... or employees... leaders yes, but they just don't understand process at all.... so tell them so and get on with the job at hand!

      Suck it up! there are people out there who need a good supervisor and are suffering because their employer can't find one and has to settle for a bad one....

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:I hate high-level jobs. by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      How is "Not breaking the law" to their credit?

      They're SUPPOSED to not break the law!

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  93. Outsourcing by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In industry generally you outsource when you have a large batch of work to do and you don't want to ramp up inhouse. In the software business this generally means finding someone to churn out mountains of code.

    The resulting mountains may look good on the monthly sloc metrics but its not what you want to see as an engineer. If a programmer comes back to me and says he made the required changes and produced negative 200 lines of code I would be happy.

    One reason that a company like apple might decide not to proceed with something like this is that mass production is not really what they are looking for.

    I don't have any problems with India specifically and I think we are going to see more of this situation where the large packages of work, which are less interesting for me anyway, going off shore.

  94. You don't understand the situation. by raehl · · Score: 1

    Ability to feed children has nothing to do with poverty, it has to do with arable land. People with no money who have some arable land can feed themselves. We've been doing it for millions of years. And the more kids you have, the better chance you have at producing enough extra food to do something else (at least, if we westerners didn't drive down food prices so much with our nice agricultura subsidies.) Kids don't really starve in India. Kids do starve in Africa, because of widespread FAMINE, i.e., the inability to grow stuff (and in many places, warlords taking anything that does get grown.)

    In most parts of the world where poor people have lots of kids, people don't have kids DESPITE not being able to afford them; they have lots of kids because they CAN'T afford NOT to have them. Procreation gets you free labor in a few years and assures there is someone to feed you when you're old. It's the poor man's social security.

    If you want poor people in 3rd world countries to stop procreating all the time, give them the same agricultural subsidies we give to 1st world farmers. Then instead of having kids they'll buy tractors.

    That's the funny thing about westerners - you spend a bunch of your tax dollars driving down the price of food on the world market to the point that people abroad can't make any money in agriculture, then get pissy when they find a way to do programming instead.

    1. Re:You don't understand the situation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We haven't been doing it for millions of years. You could argue that humans have been around for 100,000 years, but it is accepted that modern humans emerged after Cro Magnon about 12,000 years ago. So, we have been doing it for 12,000 years.

  95. I don't find this to be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    they don't speak English very well

    In my experience they do. They often sound "foreign", of course. But the difference in pronunciation between an Indian and an American is of about the same magnitude as the difference in pronunciation between someone from New York city and someone from Alabama.

    If anything, the Indians I have talked to speak better English than a lot of Americans, if you ignore accent and notice grammar and vocabulary.

  96. From a nerd in California... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    From a nerd in California, I have to say that you are absolutly correct. Once I hit $50k a year, life was pretty easy.

  97. How to find Indian (Cocoa) programmers? by kanweg · · Score: 1

    I hear all about outsourcing to India, but how do you find a (cocoa) programmer?

    Bert

  98. India has a huge problem though.... by raehl · · Score: 1

    India's problem is that it's India. Who wants to live in India?

    All the talented people I've worked with who are from India (or somewhere similar) live in the US. And I think that's the problem Apple is having - the cheap labor in India is cheap for a reason: It sucks. The people in India who are talented leave. The people they work for figure they'll get more out of them if the live in the US, or they get enough money themselves to move here, or they establish their talent with education and get accepted for US masters programs and work here after that.

    If you're an Indian who can do a job as well as an American can, why work for Indian wages in India when you can work for American wages in America?

    1. Re:India has a huge problem though.... by cowbutt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you're an Indian who can do a job as well as an American can, why work for Indian wages in India when you can work for American wages in America?

      Because being paid above-average Indian wages in India will buy you a better standard of living than average or below-average wages in America?

      I'm from the UK, and I recognise that although, on exchange rate terms, I could probably get a higher income by working in the US, the extra costs (including social costs) would probably cancel out most, if not all, of the benefit. Of course, the smart thing is probably to work in the US for a short period of time, save as much as possible, then either retire in a cheap part of the world or use your previous highly-paid employment as evidence that you should be as highly-paid in a cheaper part of the world. That all sounds like a bit too much hassle for me, though...

    2. Re:India has a huge problem though.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the talented people I've worked with who are from India (or somewhere similar) live in the US.

      Which countries other than the US have you worked in?

    3. Re:India has a huge problem though.... by raehl · · Score: 1

      None - but you're assuming I only work with people who live in the US. MOST of the people I work with who are not from the US don't live in the US either.

    4. Re:India has a huge problem though.... by ghoul · · Score: 1

      I used to work for an Israeli company and the feeling used to be that Americans were better suited to MArketing and customer facing jobs. Its kind of the result of the American education system where the jocks and cheerleaders are the respected ones so even the nerds pick up better social skills than people in the rest of the world. For pure tech work Indians and Russians were considered. You can see it even in the American research institutions which are structured so that the ones who can network the best attend the seminars and breakfasts are the ones who get funding and eventually make progress. Its not a bad system but it is limited to being incremental. No more can you have a brilliant scientist shut up in a lab for years and come up with a breakthrough which changes the world. That kind of mad scientist (Newton,copernicus) was possible when Europeans were the driving force of innovation (till WW2 basically) but in todays American world even amongst the nerdiest of communities the cheerleaders are on top e.g In the Open Source Community the coordinators and the speech makers are the most valued.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    5. Re:India has a huge problem though.... by sjf · · Score: 1

      Well, the exchange rate is rapidly eroding the benefit of higher a higher US wage.

      I'd be interested to know what you count as the 'social costs'. I recently moved back to the UK from the US, and frankly regret it. I earn more than I did in the US, but my standard of living is vastly lower: my house is half the size and cost more than my US one, I can't believe how bad the NHS has become in my absence. The health care alone is enough to guarantee we'll move back ASAP.

      Then again, I lived in 'Taxachusetts' we had a good (for the US) education system, fabulous health care provision and (for the US) a pretty liberal politcal environment.

      I'd say that if you can live without decent beer, bread, cheese, television, the British sense of humour, dont mind paying $20 for a bottle of marmite and work in the tech sector, I guarantee that you would have a higher standard of living in the US.

    6. Re:India has a huge problem though.... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I'm from Ireland, living in the US for 8 years now, and have to agree. Although salaries in Ireland appear to be much higher on the face of it, in Purchasing Power Parity they certainly are not. Housing costs and indirect taxation being the killers in Ireland, plus ridiculously high costs for services... Rip-Off Ireland is alive and well.

    7. Re:India has a huge problem though.... by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      I'd be interested to know what you count as the 'social costs'. I recently moved back to the UK from the US, and frankly regret it. I earn more than I did in the US, but my standard of living is vastly lower: my house is half the size and cost more than my US one

      The things you mentioned are exactly the sort of things I'd class as social costs, as well as things like even more car-centric cities and lifestyles, higher levels of violent crime, and a wider gaper between rich and poor (which, even aside from any ethical considerations, results in pretty dysfunctional behaviour - which I've observed for myself in parts of the UK).

      I can't believe how bad the NHS has become in my absence. The health care alone is enough to guarantee we'll move back ASAP.

      Wouldn't getting a BUPA or PPP private healthcare plan be cheaper than moving back?

    8. Re:India has a huge problem though.... by pimproot · · Score: 1

      I share your sentiment about americanization, though even within the supposed hard sciences popularity and eloquence have of course biased the recognition of achievements for centuries.

      For instance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_eponymy : ..
      In its simplest and strongest form it says: "No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." In philology it is known as the "Rule of the Lesser Attribution." Historical acclaim and reputation tend to be allocated to people unevenly. Scientific observations and results are often associated with people who have high visibility and social status, and are named long after their discovery. Eponymy is a striking example of this phenomenon. Particularly important scientific observations are often associated with a person, as in the case of Gaussian distribution, Halley's comet, and Planck's constant. Historians of science, however, have noted that often the person who is associated with the particular observation, theory, or result was not its original inventor. Based on his studies on the history of statistics, Stephen Stigler therefore proposed his own "Stigler's Law of Eponymy."

      Stigler attributes the discovery of Stigler's Law to Robert K. Merton. See Matthew effect and obliteration by incorporation. ..
      And Wikipedia's elision of "Stigler" from this article's title is itself an example of obliteration by incorporation

  99. Cost of living? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    "I am a developer in India. All my college buddies are too. Not one of us gets less than $800 per month."

    That's interesting. But to put the number in context, maybe you could tell us a bit about your cost of living? What is a flat per moth? What about cars and computers?

  100. Re:outsource management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely correct. Actually some lower level professional jobs have begun being outsourced such as law research firms and other lawyer jobs. Payback is a bitch - take that 'professionals' (the big fanboys and fangirls of outsourcing).

    Let's be serious here - Corporate America is infected with hundreds of thousands of middle managers of dubious skill. As an engineer I've seen close to zero decent department managers or even good project managers. The quality usually stops at the team leader level and this is due to the fact that Corporate America is in love with MBAs, though an MBA promises nothing. Getting an MBA isn't like getting an M.D. You still need experience and talent regardless of all the pseudo science you learn at that business program. Most successful startups made it by having plenty of engineers and not enough biz people. Once you add layers upon layers of managers whose only skill is the ability to repeat buzzwords you start to grind to a halt.

    Nor is top management worth what it gets. Does anybody really think that a zillionaire CEO who owns 10% of the company is worth the pay? Ken Leigh sure did a number on Enron as did many other 'business visionaries'.

  101. Re:if quality count by celendin · · Score: 1

    There's nothing wrong with Chinese Engineers. I'd like to see Bretchel or any American company take on Engineering something like The Three Gorges Dam. China actually has a strong history in Engineering going all the way back to building the Great Wall. China's products are of low standard not because of poor engineering, but because there is no Qaulity Assurance program.

  102. Outsourcing doesn't save money by Jerim · · Score: 1

    I recently read an article about the latestt numbers coming out of the whole outsourcing process.

    Problem is that after you take into account all the supporting factors and not just employee salaries, it is costing roughly the same to outsource as it is to host the jobs in the US.

    So not only does a company get a lot of bad publicity, they don't really save any subtantial amount of money.

    My belief is that this was a factor in Apple's decision. Either they plan on housing the jobs in the US for roughly the same price, or they are looking for a country where the savings would be greater. Outsourcing seems to be a fad that is falling off in popularity.

  103. tech support too? by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the software and support will be completely pulled out

    I wonder... I am an apple service tech and we have lost our dial-in support for service assistance in leu of an ichat-like support from... you guessed it... India. I talk to Chetan quite a lot but the names are very clearly all Indian. (they don't do like some tech support places, where you get someone with a hip-deep Indian accent who introduces himself as "Greg". Ya right...) A few times I've asked them where they were located, and it was of course some city in India. They do seem to be "otherwise occupied" when I chat with them, with 3-10 minute "ping times" on their answers being common. I also asked one of them one time, how many people are you chatting with right now? He says NINE. wow. Indians apparently have one thing on me, an amazing ability to multitask to the extreme.

    While the people we are chatting with are actually quite capable and do a good job, they are being pushed much too hard to offer the level of service we were used to by the US reps on the phone. I don't know if that's Apple demanding it, or the Indian phone support business offering a no-questions-asked calls-taken-per-hour rate.

    I seriously wonder though if this includes the service support also. I would like to see it go back to the old ways. If they are doing it, I would not be surprised if it were based on the feedback that they are receiving on their quality of service. "Sweatshop" work is never high quality.

    If it's just the customer support that's being moved back, best guess would be the customers do not like talking to someone that they clearly can tell is not even in the same country. I know it slightly irks me when I call some support/help number and get someone from India. (why is it always India? why can't it be Russia or Japan or Africa?) I think that even if the person on the line is knowledgeable and helpful, knowing it's someone from India (or any other country really) tends to put people in the mindset that they are not receiving high quality support, possibly because they know that the support person is probably receiving a very small wage compared to what it would be in the 'states.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:tech support too? by ButHed · · Score: 1
      I also asked one of them one time, how many people are you chatting with right now? He says NINE. wow. Indians apparently have one thing on me, an amazing ability to multitask to the extreme.

      You should have asked the follow-up question: how many of those 9 are work related? My guess: maybe 1. In a company I worked for, we did some analysis of our Jabber traffic. Many of the folks from our Pune (India) operations sent thousands of Jabber messages per day. I would hate to think how much additional Yahoo or MSN chat traffic there was on top of that.

      Now that may not have been so bad if it were somehow productive. But it seemed inconsistent with the fact that they almost never got done what they were supposed to do, when they were supposed to do it. And when something was nominally completed, it was almost always of very poor quality.

      One guy came to our local office for a couple of weeks and immediately jumped to the top Jabberer (no small achievement, in a Jabber community of thousands). The thing was, he was supposed to be the recipient of "technology transfer" from the local team. We thought he was hidden in his cube reading documentation. Guess not.

      So either they were very inefficient communicators, or not really focused on the job.

      Of course, this has as much to do with managment as anything. Maybe the mistake was hiring Indian managers.

      Now let me say this. Some of the folks I met from India were amazingly intelligent, incredibly hard-working and most anxious to learn what we could teach them. Which they did, and then promptly disappeared, either to the U.S. or to a better-paying job in India. And frankly, I can't say that I blame them for that. I guess we just got stuck with the ones who couldn't move ahead.

  104. Re:if quality count by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

    We're not talking civil engineering here. Pay attention to the topic; we're talking about Software Engineering. And being at a company where there's a large contingent of outsourced staff, it's been extremely difficult getting decent quality out of Chinese engineers. A ton of money was thrown at the problem, and the bottom line is most investment in hiring in China is just done so that companies can grease the wheels for doing business there (since locals will not (or are not allowed to) do business with comapnies that do not invest in China. It's ridiculous and sad, and I just wish people would stop justifying it by saying that it's cheaper or that the outsources was done because they have skills that couldn't be found locally, because both those arguments are bald-faced lies.

  105. Re: CV inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same experience from academia: almost all Indian students are "#2 out of X thousand students" at their school, at least in their resumes.

    I have a part-time university job (research, no actual teaching), with a placeholder university page. My academic e-mail address brings me a steady stream of CV spam, from Indian, Chinese, and some Pakistani students. With very rare exceptions, all Indian students claim to be #2 in their class, i.e., "out of X thousand". The few modest ones were only #3.

  106. spare us the elitism by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you don't want to be living one mortgage payment from being out on the street, DON'T! Learn to live within your means. Put 25% of your money into your retirement account. blah blah blah

    You can do all that and more and still be up a creek if you have a run of bad luck. Hell, you could be a VP earning 300k a year and enough money saved up for six years worth of bills and be royally screwed by the loss of your job and any of these events:
     
    • Catastrophic illness/accident. Yes, you have great insurance, but it doesn't cover everything and your bills are in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
    • The housing market finally takes a big dump. Your little condo in San Diego that you bought for $1.5 million a couple years ago is now worth half that much, and you still can't find any buyers.
    • The nice girl you met in college and married has now turned into a greedy, psychopathic bitch after 8 years of marriage. She divorces you, takes the house, half your assets, primary custody of your two kids and the court awards her hefty child support payments.

    The last can be a real bitch, because states get matching funds from the federal government for the child support they collect, so they have a strong incentive to collect as much as possible. It is difficult to have payments reduced in the event of a job loss and in any case might be set based on what you "should" be making. Some of the more draconian states will even seize your car, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense if you have to drive to get to your job.
    1. Re:spare us the elitism by xero314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Poor choices in life are no excuse for being a failure. I mean beyond the possibility of illness the thing mentioned in the parent comment are all things you would have control over at one point. If you some how thought it was resonable to purchase a little condo for $1.5 million then you deserve the hardship when the house market crashes (since it would have to crash enough to offset how ever many years of rent you would have otherwise paid.). If you can't figure out how to make a marriage work, or are a poor judge of people then once again I don't feel any sympathy.

      There are families in the united states that survive on just over minimum wage with little governmental assistance. If you ever pulled down $300k a year and find yourself in hard times, you pretty much fucked up and probably should be allowed to handle your personal finances anymore.

    2. Re:spare us the elitism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earth to Huston, come in Huston.
      *static*

    3. Re:spare us the elitism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't figure out how to make a marriage work, or are a poor judge of people then once again I don't feel any sympathy.

      But have you moved out your Mom's basmenet yet?

      The majority of your comment suggests that you don't have much life experience.

    4. Re:spare us the elitism by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      I bet the first thing you thought when you heard about the employees at Enron getting screwed over was "They had it coming."

      Or when elderly people are bilked out of their retirement by conmen.

    5. Re:spare us the elitism by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Hmm. I wonder if the laws we've created regarding reproduction are a veiled attempt to keep the population down?

      It's working for me; I can still drive to work.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:spare us the elitism by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      You speak like someone who has never had a string of bad luck or had a relationship end.

      Bad things happen that you cannot control.

      However, only idiots live on the edge 1 payment away from bankruptcy.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:spare us the elitism by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've read some articles over the last few years that young women are finding harder to find men to marry and have kids with.

      Apparently the men are finally getting the message: If there is a divorce you *will* be screwed for a very long time. Everyone seems to know someone who ended up paying the house payments while the ex lived there with her new boyfriend or someone who paid child support, got to see their kids 6 days out of 30 and watched the money spent on toys for the ex-wife instead of the kids.

      And 50% of marriages end in divorce so you have a 50/50 chance of your "true love" turning into a pox on your existance-- and that's assuming you didn't do something to deserve her wrath like screwing around-- if you did that she is likely to spend the rest of her life thinking of new ways to torment you.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:spare us the elitism by rk · · Score: 1

      There's no excuse for the fraud of Enron, and I hope the assholes who architected the fraud go away to jail for a very long time, but I'm pretty certain any financial advisor with his or her salt would tell you that it's a really stupid move to invest heavily in your employer, since you're already very financially bound to them. Any employee of company X that puts all their retirement into a 401k of "company X stock only" is begging for ruin.

      Diversify, diversify, diversify.

  107. future of the software industry by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    A number of people have been commenting on how outsourcing is being scaled back after initial enthusiasm due to communication problems (language and time lag) primarily.

    Really, this has been pretty obvious from the start. Outsourcing makes sense for some companies, but for companies whose bread and butter is software, like apple, it's pretty crazy to put your workers on the other side of the planet from you management. The different time zones alone make it difficult to hear back from someone on the same day for any issue

    However, there's an important question that most people gloss over. If there are so many indian developers, why aren't they starting their own companies and selling us the software directly, instead of working through an intermediary. Hiring an american firm to do localization, but keeping management in india makes a lot more sense than having the software designers and the software implementers on the other side of the world.

    Really, an important question is, why is software development still so centered in american, canada, and europe? Even the Japanese and Koreans seem to mostly only put out software in terms of video games.

    I suspect a lot of it has to do with distribution. It might be difficult for a startup company in india to make the necessary contacts to get their product onto shelves in walmarts in america, or to get them pre-loaded on a dell OEM disk. Even so, that shouldn't apply to Japan, where many companies have a strong presence here. Why doesn't Sony have consumer software division? Why isn't there a Japanese Microsoft or IBM? Why isn't there a Microsoft or IBM in *any* country aside from America?

    There's often a lot of talk about the material differences between the first and third world nations (does china still count as a 2nd world nation? how many people still remember what the 2nd world refers to?), but there is there seems to be a major economic disparity among the first world nations. This disparity isn't so much in the standard of living, but in the ability of local industries to sprout up and end up dominating in the international scene. The mcdonalds, starbucks, microsoft, coca cola phenomena.

    If I stop and think about it, what foreign brands are there that are really prevalent in the US? There's quite a few japanese brands in electronics, games, and cars. There's some german car brands... hmm.. ikea? Really, you'd think there'd be a stronger showing from the historically economically powerful countries like Britain, Germany, and France. What's keeping them on the sidelines?

    1. Re:future of the software industry by Ruie · · Score: 1
      Really, you'd think there'd be a stronger showing from the historically economically powerful countries like Britain, Germany, and France. What's keeping them on the sidelines?

      Part of this has to do with the culture of small business in the US. To have one you need a product that someone needs and you need to be better then the incumbent. Eventually this leads to more visible brands.

      In contrast, a lot of people in other countries see success as getting a steady pay out of existing entity. So you have large companies like Philips, Sony, etc growing larger and having more products, but under the same brand. It rarely makes sense to have redundant offering from the same company, so the choice is smaller as well.

      This probably goes double for the software, as the success of the particular product is hard to plan, so US has an advantage from higher number of independent attempts.

    2. Re:future of the software industry by ctid · · Score: 1
      If I stop and think about it, what foreign brands are there that are really prevalent in the US? There's quite a few japanese brands in electronics, games, and cars. There's some german car brands... hmm.. ikea? Really, you'd think there'd be a stronger showing from the historically economically powerful countries like Britain, Germany, and France. What's keeping them on the sidelines?


      How about the World Wide Web? Not a brand in the sense you mean it of course, but giant multinationals aren't everything you know.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  108. the kids are alright! by allgoodnamesaretaken · · Score: 0

    what ever happened to exploiting young nerdy kids fresh out of highschool? they work for a pittance and have more energy. sure theres a language and cultural barrier but hey, the more disposable income the kids have the less they have to mooch of their parents for that new ipod/ibook. win win baby!

  109. Aren't you dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyway, think about this: The reason for outsourcing is to reduce costs. So, they will go for the cheapest option. The contractor wants the greatest profit, so will go for the cheapest people.

    Ergo, all outsourcing projects have dumbasses working the lines.

    Absolutely NOTHING to do with the skills available in the group.

  110. more reading comprehension by weierstrass · · Score: 1

    Yes, this explains that Steve Jobs sold $296m worth of shares in order to pay tax on the other $300m+ worth of shares he was paid by Apple.

    In other words: He sold $296m worth of shares (back to Apple) as I stated. He received a massive amount (several hundred million dollars) worth of income off Apple in the last few years, in the form of shares, as I implied.

    What's your point?

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  111. Re-source the diaspora by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    The whole outsourcing thing seems to be backwards to me. We should be using our massive base of educated and tech-literate people to become the destination of outsourcing from China and India. We've got the base. Let's add the language to create SuperGeeks. Chinese call centers should be in the USA. Same with India ones. Guy from Bangalore calls Detroit to get his PC straight and talks to some American in Hindi. Send our salesmen to India and China, not our programmers or call centers.

    From what I've read here, Apple probably had problems with recruiting, training, costs, culture, general educational level, communications, troubleshooting, QUALITY, language etc. etc. You've got to be some kind of corporate moron or delusional to take that on.

    Some day companies will get the idea. Then they'll all want to come home. And guess what? They will have lost the thread. I suggest there is a subtle, but very real, longterm cost to pay for spending x years out of country. Things are never as interchangeable or as reversible as they seem.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  112. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yah, but you're a girl.

  113. More like... by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    White lie

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  114. Outsourcing....... by segedunum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What goes around comes around, as they say. I've been amused by many companies over the years who thought they could save a huge bundle of money, when in reality the staff employed in those functions they want to move makes up perhaps 20% of their organisation but makes the most impact. Do people in a foreign country answering your calls, where it is totally obvious they know not even the most basic things about where you live (and you have waste time and money repeating things twenty times), does that sound good and make you want to use that company? I'll quote Joel Spolsky and Pradeep Singh:

    (Here's something Pradeep Singh taught me today: if only 20% of your staff is programmers, and you can save 50% on salary by outsourcing programmers to India, well, how much of a competitive advantage are you really going to get out of that 10% savings?)

    You also have the additionally huge costs of training those new employees, or outsourcing organisations, up in the ways of the organisation, the products, the technology and you also spend huge amounts of wasted time and money on communication. I've known many banks who've had that experience. A poor call centre worker gets the warm ear treatment from a customer in Europe, US, Canada etc. because the website is throwing up errors and he/she can't complete a transaction. A call is logged and there is a series of frantic phone calls and e-mails to the outsourced programming company in India, who needless to say, haven't got the faintest idea what they're talking about. Also (and this happens even in outsourcing companies situated in the same country but in another part) because they are not physically located in the heat of battle, and within on-site reach, they just don't give a shit. They'll do it when they've got time.

    In short, you need to have your support functions in your company with you completely, and they need to be as close to your paying customers as you can get. If there is a market in India for your products then by all means get close to your customers and open offices in India. Idiot CEOs and boards still have this ridiculously stupid fucking idea that the world is a place separated only by a common language - English. I think even British, American and Australian people can agree that that is most certainly not true. I suggest these idiot board members go and read the number one, definitive guide on running a multinational company properly:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/186197691 7/sr=1-2/qid=1149421474/ref=pd_bowtega_2/202-73591 57-8712641?_encoding=UTF8&s=books&v=glance

    What happened here is difficult to tell from the article, but maybe Apple had that sneeking suspision that maybe it just wasn't going to work.

  115. [OT] Re:Pop-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash-block. I don't see any ads from TOI (times of india).

    I hate the TOI website - it's a bloody tabloid and they have no sense of what's news and what's not.

    www.thehindu.com for real Indian news - except their website is beyond pathetic.

  116. Apple Pulls Out of India by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 0

    Apple Pulls Out of India

    I suppose that's better than Apple prematurely ejaculating inside India.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  117. Thank god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At least one company has the sense to pull out of the land of the incompetent at least. I've been trying to resolve an ongoing issue with Dell's worthless Indian support team for 10months now. They collected my laptop 4 times and failed to fix it every single time which took 4months total and then they offered to replace it which was great... only now they're pestering me to pick up the old laptop which I've taken 3 days off work to wait for the courier to collect and neither of the 3 times it arrived yet they're threatening to invoice me as if it's my fault they haven't arranged for the courier. Anyhow, add in a few promised phone calls that never happened +50 or so phone calls at my expense throughout the whole debacle without it being resolved still and it's left me with the conclusion that the problem with Indian support centres isn't just a language barrier issue, they're just as a whole outright incompetent with a horrifically bad work ethic.

    Been a good weekend for news really:
    - MPAA etc. getting it's ass kicked by TPB

    - Various Al Qaeda terror busts across the world

    - A company realises that outsourcing to india sucks

    It's as if the world is suddenly becoming sane again!

    1. Re:Thank god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Various Al Qaeda terror busts across the world

        I thought you backward inbred incestuous peices of neo-nazi Ku-Klux Crap LOVED al-Qaeda and danced to their tune everywhere...

      http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/29/schuster.column/

  118. The truth behind Indian tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an ex-employee of a couple of tech support firms handling big customers such as the world's number one software maker and the number one computer maker, I've also handled tech support for an ISP in US .I've spent a total of 4 years in the call center industry, Quit that field and am now happily doing what I love best ( Coding :) )

    I would like to share my observations on the entire ordeal, while I see a lot of frustration and anger about outsourcing, belive me the same level of frustration is present here too.

    Lets take the cost advantage issue while American companies benefit from outsourcing it is the Indian companies that are the real winners reaping huge rewards (unfortunately these rewards are never passed on to the tech) while the tech on the floor suffers, they are increasingly pushed to achieve higher FTR (first time resolution rates), Higher (Csats) customer satisfaction rates and a lower on call time.

    Would you believe we had to wrap up a call including documentation of the case in 18-21 minutes flat and the phones would start ringing automatically after a 2 minute break?? (Try reinstalling windows XP in 20 minutes!!!) Or that Incentives would be provided to who ever achieved the insane figures of 80% FTR and CSAT of 95%.Many a times the last company that i worked for screwed all the techs off their hard earned incentives by putting up targets that were beyond anybodies abilities.

    The previous poster hits the truth when he says there is a lot of churn in the Industry and a person goes to the next company with all the training he has obtained from the present company for a substantially higher package.

    The biggest thing working against such places is that they do not have an healthy respect for knowledge and have never heard about knowledge management.

    While all these factors leads to lower morale among techs and frustrated customers at the other end, the techs are the ones who suffer breakdowns and literally perform career suicide by checking out call center jobs which are a dead end.

    I am thankful that i got out of this industry when i could.

  119. I feel Apple has screwed up.. by sunsrin · · Score: 1

    Not everyone is coming to India for cheap labour. Likes of Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are doing research and development and not just maintenance work. So, It's cheap labour + great products which these companies are looking at. Apple has a history of screwing up once in a while, not a surprise that they would do something like this within such short span of time.

    1. Re:I feel Apple has screwed up.. by h2d2 · · Score: 1

      The big names you put forth make up perhaps less than 1 percent of the outsourced man-power in India. People here are are complaining against the quality of the CS / general development work that is being sent to India in massive numbers, which one would be foolish not to label as subpar. So again, the R&D work done in India, although getting much press, is insignificant.

      --
      Mozilla stole tabs from NetCaptor. So what? Right?
  120. This is Nothing by earthstar · · Score: 1
    This story perse is nothing......What actually is the reason behind Apple's extreme decision?

    Obviously they wouldnt have floated the venture w/o months of prior spadework/feasibilty - Yet to pull out in 3 months? Sucha sudden decision? Something went awry somewhere - probably just in someones head ....Wanna see whos gonna break the REAL story !!

  121. I will bet that significant US folks would quit by swschrad · · Score: 1

    and that freaked the apple brass. what, quit before we can you? how can this be?

    but it makes me feel way better this morning that somebody pulled back from the Slope to Hell.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:I will bet that significant US folks would quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the tragedy of outsourcing, to India or anywhere else, is that management is usually counting on US citizens quitting! Apple ruled out outsourcing to India but I seem to recall from the article that they are going ahead with outsourcing somewhere else.

      Anyway, Apple has sort of been in a "maintenance mode" for the past decade anyway. NeXT did not have the time/money to transition away from BSD to SysV like Sun, IBM, HP and everyone else. When Apple picked up NeXT, they had to use the resources to focus on integrating the legacy APIs with NeXT APIs and getting the product shipping again, so no upgrade has occurred yet. At this point, they should just kill the kernel and replace it with NTv7 and Cygwin so there is driver compatibility with the other Intel-based platform. WebObjects has fallen to LAMP and as the MVC-frameworks and development tools become more mature for PHP5, I doubt Cocoa will survive either. No, most of Apple's innovation comes from Ives (the bathroom fixture designer who gave us the nice industrial design for the cases) and from their awesome PR and marketing firms. If you think they are going to buy Sun Microsystems and merge Solaris into some next generation GUI (beyond NeXTStep/Cocoa), forget it. They're more likely to go off building Captain Kirk type devices that combine VoIP, SMS and AAC with iTMS.

  122. We are tilted to socialism ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I am from Poland and ues, those who call themselves
    social democrats are quite liberal with respect to economy and values.

    But there are many more who call themselves
    conservatives who are very socialist in their view of economy.

    So do not look at how one calls himself but look
    at opinions:

    Free education, free medical service, high and
    long-term unemployment benefits, early retirements
    and progressive and high taxes ( overall taxes
    related to my salary that are paid by me and by
    employer reach 85% ).

    Those are things MUCH more popular in Europe than
    in the US and this is what it means that
    Europe is more 'socialist' than the US.

  123. Mahrajah of Bangalore by Frightening · · Score: 1

    No offense to the anonymous coward there, or any other Indians, BUT:

    If you're making $800 a day or whatever you should seriously consider buying Bangalore, declaring yourself Mahrajah, and giving out free DVDs on holidays.

    Seriously..

    If you're getting above average pay (US standards) as an entry level SE, then why did apple try to get Indian talent to develop *in* India? If it's just good engineers, they would have shipped them home (MS is doing that here in Egypt now). Money is obviously involved.

    P.S We all know why Apple left India. It was the food you dorks.
    Curry /*cough*/ diarrhea /*cough*/.

  124. Your missing the point by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I'm not talking about people starving, I'm talking about them raising their standard of living. We're a mechanized society. We don't need kids, we've got machines to do all that back breaking labor (well, not all of it, but most. It takes about 1% of a mechanized populace's workforce to make food for the other 99%). The problem is, we don't need these kids anymore, and there's nothing really for them to do (no jobs). In Utopia, they'd all go off and become great artists and thinkers. In the real world, they've pitted against each other in economic and military wars for the benefit/amusement of the ruling class.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  125. The graveyards are full of indispensable men by ccmay · · Score: 2, Insightful
    if you want to feel small, insignificant and just like a number, there's no place better to go than a Fortune 500 company.

    You know, even at the top of the heap, executives and senior managers sometimes get the boot suddenly and without pity, just like this. Look at what happeneed to Carly Fiorina. As Charles DeGaulle said once, when being begged to run for another term as President of France, "the graveyards are full of indispensable men." Everyone is a replaceable cog in a giant machine, and nobody should be surpised or discouraged because of it. If you don't like it, start your own company where you can be the undisputed kingpin.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
    1. Re:The graveyards are full of indispensable men by gnuLNX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you serious? Go look what she got for her golden parachute. Screw Carly Fiorina and her billion dollar lifestyle. Who cares if a multi millionaire gets fired..they don't have to feed their families.

      --
      what?
  126. You'all have beef? by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    A mountain of beef vindaloo,...

        I thought you guys didn't eat beef, you know, scared cows having the right of way in the streets and all that other stuff that we in USA get taught about India.

    1. Re:You'all have beef? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Hey its a free country . You can eat what you want. We look upon Americans eating beef in the same way as we look on South Koreans eating dogs or Eskimos eating raw whale blubber. The gag factor is high but if you want to eat it who am I to prevent you but please try and not do it in front of me :)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:You'all have beef? by grolschie · · Score: 1
      I thought you guys didn't eat beef, you know, scared cows having the right of way in the streets and all that other stuff that we in USA get taught about India.
      Not all Indians are hindu. And who said I was Indian? :-)
    3. Re:You'all have beef? by lonecrusader · · Score: 1

      Late on this thread, but had to reply! First off... I work in India and I get paid 46K$ p.a. and I have 9 years of work experience. In the US, I would probably make double that amount, but considering the general economic growth in India, I feel I make more money investing in real estate and equity market in India, than my friends do in the US. Except for the generic infrastructure which is nowhere near US standards, I have my own little world i.e. my home, my car, my weekend getaways etc etc where I live close to the US standard of living. And beef is eaten in India by many people. :-)

  127. re: CEOs own 12 percent of US corporations by Morris+Schneiderman · · Score: 1

    You wrote: "In 1992, CEOs held 2 percent of the stock of US corporations, nowadays they own 12 percent. In less than 15 years, CEOs (not including other executives, just CEOs), have 'earned' themselves 10 whole percent of corporate America."

    What is your source for this data? I'm not disagreeing. I've certainly seen a great increase in C level remuneration, but I've never seen it quantified this way before. Which CEOs? All corporations; Fortune 500; all publicly traded?

  128. Economic Illiteracy by B_SharpC · · Score: 1

    Slashdot illiteracy

    It is not wage rates that create unstable outsourced jobs in the 'global' economy. Your corrupt Central Bank aka Fed Reserve, is a huge USA job killing machine.

    FEDERAL RESERVE JOB TERMINATOR
    That is what the Federal Reserve does. It kills jobs. That's all it does. ...in the classic words of the Terminator.

    --
    Score & Karma: SASA: Slashdot Approval Seekers Anonymous
  129. Re: CV inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pass/fail over there. So they all failed and tied for 2nd.

  130. Re:Cost of living? Think PPP by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    "I am a developer in India. All my college buddies are too. Not one of us gets less than $800 per month."
    That's interesting. But to put the number in context, maybe you could tell us a bit about your cost of living? What is a flat per moth? What about cars and computers?
    I assume the original poster converted his rupee salary into USD using the bank exchange rate, some 45 Rs to 1 US$. There is another way to do the conversion, called Purchase Power Parity. [1]. Basically define a basket of goods and services, calculate how much it would cost to buy it in each country and calculate an PPP exchange rate. The economist defined Big Mac Index [2] and found it matched the PPP numbers. I am finding it difficult to find the actual PP exchange rate between USD(ollar) and INR(upee). From my personal experience I would rate it to be 10 Rs /Dollar. The PPP correction for that salary would be a factor of 4.5. So he is making 3600 PPP-USD/month.

    Domestic servants, hair cuts, medical service etc would be very very cheap. He would pay higher percentage of his salary than his US counterpart for things like diapers, rubber foam inner coil mattresses, cars, electronics, etc.

    If any of you find a good source of PPP conversion factors for countries, especially with historical trends and fluctuations, please do post. Most of the links make assertions like "India is the fourth largest economy after adjusting for PPP" or "China jumps from fourth to second position after adjusting for PPP", without actually specifying the number. The PPP figure seems to be mostly popular with macro economists. In US one can find the cost-of-living adjustment numbers for any city quite easily. May be once a mobile global workforce develops such numbers will be availble for all countries and cities.

    [1] http://internationalecon.com/v1.0/Finance/ch30/F30 -1.html

    [2] http://www.economist.com/markets/bigmac/displaySto ry.cfm?story_id=2708584

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  131. Re: CEOs own 12 percent of US corporations by weierstrass · · Score: 1
    Still, it should not be thought that the entrepreneurs behind the great telecoms bust were so clumsy as to get caught up in the financial carnage they left in their wake. Between 1997 and 2001, insiders cashed in some $18 billion in shares, unloading more than half this total in 2000, the year the price of telecoms shares peaked. But this only scratches the surface of the titanic redistribution of wealth achieved by US corporate leaders in the 1990s. Between 1995 and 1999, the value of stock options granted to US executives more than quadrupled, from $26.5 billion to $110 billion, or one fifth of non-financial corporate profits, net of interest. In 1992, corporate CEOs held 2 per cent of the equity of US corporations; today, they own 12 per cent. This ranks among the most spectacular acts of expropriation in the history of capitalism.

    Robert Brenner, Towards the Precipice in the London Review of Books

    as to your second question, the context doesn't make it clear. i'm assuming all publicly quoted (and trying to find his original source..) hth.
    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  132. The Indian student perspective by rup29 · · Score: 1

    I am a CS student in India, studying in an engineering college. Over the past few years a large number of privately funded engineering institutions have mushroomed all over the country. We students, when we wrere in school, took it as the opening of oppurtunities for us to study engineering. Because all these years engineering was confined to a few prestigious state funded institutes (of which the IITs are world famous).In an overpopulated country like India competition is fierce and getting into these places is difficult. It is also the dream of most middle-class students to become an engineer or a doctor. These professions bear a lot of social prestige. So, once out of school, the path forks into either of these two fields. Doctors command a lot of respect and in a place where poverty is widespread there is always work at hand. Engineers nowadays rush to enter the IT industry. Starting salaries of Rs 20,000/month (around 450 USD) are attractive for beginners, and even more tempting is the chance to travel to the US, when the company sends them on training.

    Academics here stresses on theoretical knowledge. In our college, there is no difference between the IT and the CS course. 90% of the students learnt to program in C in college. We still use the DOS Borland Turbo C++ (blue screen) IDE and know that compiling a program means clicking on the menu and finding the 'run' option. Those who have a slight inclination towards technology and computers, get sucked into the VB-.NET-Java paranoia. Though we've had papers on data structures and algorithms they have been grossly neglected by teacher and student both. It's but natural, because, spending time learning these will give us no edge over any body when we get recruited by the IT companies. For the few (there are two in my class) who resist such commercialisation of computer science education, it becomes frustrating, coping with poor quality teaching and zero exposure to innovative work.

    The IT industry here is services based. Companies like Infosys, TCS, Wipro, CTS are into mass manufacturing and maintenance of hackneyed business software. Making money is the major motivation of Indian companies. That said, at the end of the day we Indians are chasing illusions. Our policy makers are inviting outsourcing and creating jobs, and mass-producing software professionals (from engineering institutes). In the long run we loose our identity and the foreign companies return dissatisfied.

    In India you'll find geeks in litrature, music, art but since there is no generation that has been brought up on electronic gadgets, video games and the PC, the programmer community and culture is hard to find.

  133. the good news: by Talonator · · Score: 0

    India not pregnant.

  134. Re:Cost of living? Think PPP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed I was just in India, I found that sometimes this power can be even greater. For example, one can feed five people very satisfying dinners at a decent restaurant for $8; one can even get a full lunch for $0.50. Try that in the US!

  135. Re: Reasonable statement, on topic- not flamebait. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    The parent is not flamebait. Sometimes modding on slashdot is strongly biased.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  136. No popups with Internet Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then in Internet Explorer, I have it prompt me every time someone wants to run java script or ActiveX.

    Isn't that a lot of bother?

    Possibly. But it always defaults to "No", not "Yes."

    But it gives me a LOT of control over what web sites do - INCLUDING slashdot.org.

    Going into this web page, it asked me if I wanted to allow ActiveX. I said "No."

    I've tried Firefox/Mozilla's javascript security out but the control it gives me is "Yes" or "No". I can't tell Mozilla to ask me. Why is that important? Because my answer (Yes/No) can vary from page to page on the same web site.

    There are ~6 web sites that I allow popups/activex from unconditionally and about the same 6 I say "no" to everything for. And come to think of it, I should block all javascript/activex for slashdot too. Since when are they necessary for reading stories or articles on this web site?

  137. are you serious? japan? by jizmonkey · · Score: 1
    You seriously think that instead of outsourcing tech support to India we should outsource it to Japan? Have you been to Japan since General MacArthur ran the place? Labor is extremely, extremely expensive in Japan -- anything that can be automated is automated. Nobody would ever think of outsourcing low-wage phone jockey work from the US to Japan.

    For that matter, the main reason that companies outsource to India is that Indians are native English speakers. On the other hand, Japanese people who can speak English well enough to do technical support are rare and expensive. They could just as easily get a job translating technical articles at $.25 a word, which would be equally boring yet not stressful and way more lucrative.

    --
    With great power comes great fan noise.
    1. Re:are you serious? japan? by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1

      Actually, if it wasn't for the language issue, out-sourcing phone support to Japan could be a great idea. You would need a good system, that combined a CRM system with IP-phone tech and allowed the workers to work from home. Then you could tap the virtually untapped "housewife" workforce, a very polite, eager-to-work group. For first level tech based support from a checklist, this could be accomplished easily and affordably. I have actually given this idea much thought, but the language issue is the big kicker. CB

  138. So you are celebrating,huh? by earthstar · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not Yet.

    http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/4515/945/

    Apple had been offering and still continues to offer tech support from another third party BPO provider, TransWorks based here in Bangalore.
    But sources claim that this has nothing to do with the kind of quality of service that the India tech support would offer. "I think it has more to do with financial feasibility of the centre rather than the quality of service. You have to keep in mind that no work had started - basically it was just mid-level support staff that had been hired apart from Kharbanda who was expected to grow this the Dell way."

    http://www.ciol.com/content/search/showarticle1.as p?artid=84773

    Many of the components used in the company's products are, in fact, produced by third-party vendors in Taiwan, China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore. Most of the company's portable products including MacBook Pro, iBooks, and iPods are manufactured by third-party vendors in China. "It makes sense for the company to invest and expand in these regions, instead of having a new facility in India," say analysts.


    http://services.silicon.com/offshoring/0,380000487 7,39157100,00.htm
    The company stressed it isn't cutting any US jobs, noting that its ranks are growing both in the United States and overall. The Apple representative said: "Our call centres in Austin and Sacramento also continue to grow."

    Moaners can read this too :
    http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/2648?sourc e=NLT_MGT&nlid=23

    In a bizarre twist to the offshoring craze, The Boston Globe reports that some Indian high-tech companies that accept "offshoring" work from American companies are turning around and offshoring some of that work back to Americans. According to the May 30 story, INDIA TECH FIRMS SEEK US TALENT IN OFFSHORING TWIST, Tata Consultancy Services of Bangalore can't find enough workers in India to fill the 30,500 positions it needs to hire for this year so it plans to hire talent abroad, including 1,000 recruits in America. Some 9,500 positions out of 62,000 at Tata are Americans, according to the story.
    1. Re:So you are celebrating,huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bullshit that they aren't cutting any US jobs. They just cut over 1000 employees from their call center in Maryland to make way for them to outsource more. I'm glad this blew up in their face.

  139. Just a little about the Army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Please don't project whining civilian attitudes toward the US armed forces. It's insulting. The US has an all-volunteer force, and the soldiers know exactly what they're signing up for. Yes, I was in the Military (yes, during the Gulf War), and I just didn't see the "woe is me" attitude so many people project on us.

    It may be hard to imagine for some people, but there are those among us that willingly sacrifice some of taken-for-granted pleasures in life for a larger purpose.

    So even if the military isn't your thing, or you think it's evil, fine. Use the Peace Corps or Doctors Without Borders as my example. I never hear anyone say "Boy they treat those Peace Corps volunteers like shit! I bet they don't even have cable TV!"

  140. 16000$ by ghoul · · Score: 1

    800$ India = 8000$ US or 16000$ California.
    Believe me most Indian software programmers lead a much better life than California programmers. However they have to do it in the middle of society where rest of society is jealous of them so they have to kind of lead a life of fear as the poor might lash out at them anytime. So California is much better in that manner where the programmers are at the bottom so they dont have to be scared Rather the stockbrokers are afraid of the day programmers rise in revolution and storm the Bastille. Guess its your choice what you prefer if peace of mind come to California ; great lifestyle stay in India

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  141. India is Not Worth the Investment by Edoko · · Score: 1
    This can mean only one thing.


    For Apple, investing in India is not worth the money.


    Possible problems might be:


    1/ prices for software development not competitive


    2/ India suppliers unable to provide sufficient skilled personnel


    3/ Use of phone service for customer service or technical support not judged to meet Apple's quality standards.


    4/ Negotiations with US-based [or elsewhere] suppliers successful after playing India card resulted outcome more favorable to Apple.


    5/ Fully-loaded "system" costs of using India suppliers [labor, travel, logistics, management overhead, quality control] were too much to compensate for simple estimation based on cheaper labor.


    6/ Inability to get legal protection in India for intellectual property [trade secrets, patents pending]. Indian laws are inadequate.


    7/ Security and reliability of Indian subcontractors not up to Apple standards. .... and finally:


    8/ India not judged to be priority market for Apple products and services [in comparison with other parts of the world].

    1. Re:India is Not Worth the Investment by wandering_nomad_101 · · Score: 1

      I believe Apple executive were wandering about in the streets and stepped in the local dog shit. Problem is that it isn't from dogs.... Makes you think twice when you are driving to work and you see the people shitting in the streets and people waking around them. This is also why they eat with their right hands, not their left. Worked at Reliance Infocomm in Mumbai, then move to New Mumbai later. Reliance only used contracted Non-Indian Consultants to build the infrastucture, mostly Americans, Europeans and Australians, although I was leading (an American based in Thailand) a team of Malaysian and Singaporean Chinese to assess the existing Sun Systems and Viability to go to Hard Launch directly to Mukesh Ambani, I reported my findings directly to him. Problem with Indians is they all want to be bosses (all chiefs and no Indians) ;-) so it was very difficult to get things done. While working at Reliance I read in the Mumbai news paper (still have the article) about an discussion between the Pakistani and Indian PM's. The Indian PM said in the article that India would accept 2 Nuclear Hits from Pakistan but then they would destroy Pakistan. So I am wondering why the world seems to want to outsource just about everything to India, if the PM's are talking those terms then it seems likely that Bangalore, Mumbai, Chanai, Dehli are all in harms way. Guess that would solve the outsourcing problems with the US. On a last thought, I now have an IT company here in Thailand and so outsourcing but not with Indians, we use Burmese, Vietnamese, Filipinos, Indionesians, Bangaldeshi's and even Pakastanis because the cost of services is quite expensive in India and even expensive here in Thailand also. Also you have to look at where the Indians are starting to transplant themselves now. It seems that everyone on the internet that is a headhunter for IT services is Indian. Perfect spot to select the people you want for to submit for a position and eliminate the others, sounds a bit parinoid but just an observation. Also its easier to get "Tea Money" for services rendered from thankful Indians that the Locals.

    2. Re:India is Not Worth the Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "stepped in the local dog shit. Problem is that it isn't from dogs"

      Sure your weren't talking about the New York City Subway?

      "I now have an IT company here in Thailand and so outsourcing but not with Indians, we use Burmese, Vietnamese, Filipinos, Indionesians, Bangaldeshi's and even Pakastanis because "

      Gee, Lemme guess why you hate Indian Outsourcing Companies...hum, could it be $$$? Wonderful, thoughful, honest post --NOT!

  142. Was this for phone tech support? by BlueF · · Score: 1

    If this was a phone support operation, good bloody riddance!!! Shame on you apple!

    Here I was thoroughly impressed with Apple's phone support. After being PC-centric for 15 years, I finally purchased am Apple (Intel MacMini). When the wireless KB failed several weeks ago, I was pleasantly surprised with how easy it was to obtain a warranty replacement. The phone rang several times, no hold, and I spoke with a friendly, intelligent, and helpful (English speaking) tech. Not to mention the replacement KB arrived on Monday (call placed on Sunday morning).

    Wish I could say the same for Dell. I absolutely detest Dell's new "outsourced" phone support. Being responsible for 200 PCs, I've had a handful of occasionals to contact Dell Support. In the past, it was similar to my experience with Apple. Easy, painless, and expedient. Sadly, in the last year or so, I've had the misfortunate of requiring Dell Hardware Warranty support for several systems...

    Let's leave it to say that now when clients are looking for reasonably priced PCs, I still suggest Dell, but with the caveat of being prepared for infuriatingly poor support. : (

  143. Objective C is obscure by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Ok I interviewed with Apple for their San Jose office and turned them down. During my interview even the interviewer from Apple said " We dont expect people to have Obbject C experience as its so obscure and we train them" So maybe the reason Indian programmers dont have Objective C experience is because it is not used widely. The other point is if you have basic understanding of programming language concepts learning a dialect of a language is not a big deal. Also whats the thing abt people who install a Linux CD which makes them think *Nix experience makes their penises longer/boobs bigger (take your pick) . I work with *nix (sic)at college but I also use Windows on my laptop. Anything which really needs to be done on *nix (sic) I just ssh in to my department servers and work from my Windows laptop so whats the big deal? In any case anyone who understands basic computer productivity rules should be productive irrespective of platform. Secondly Mac computers are toys for people with money to burn. Their market positioning is like that of BMWs and Mercs. Just like you wouldnt find a lot of Merc mechanics in a developing country you wont find a lot of Mac programmers in India. And just like a good mechanic certified to service GM cars can retrain to service Mercs a competent .net programmer can retrain for the Mac OS platform

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  144. Re:Cost of living? Think PPP by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Well, if you pick just one item, the result can be very skewed.

    True, you can dine out very cheaply as you said. A maid to scrub the floors with Dettol, do the dishes and wash clothes for 10 to 20$ a month. Hair cut is 1$. No body has health insurance, but doctor consultation is about 1$ and may be 2$ if you get an injection at the clinic. But on the other hand ...

    ... how much did you spend on voltage stabilizers last year? yup. Small transformers to buck or boost the line voltage from the grid, that could vary from 180V to 260V, so that your 220 V appliance does not burn out. My cousin has a whole-house UPS. Really, the whole damn house is wired to these large truck batteries (12V lead-acid for the curious), except for the A/C and the fridge, all the fans and lights in the house are on UPS!!! My dad uses an ultra-violet water disinfecting system (brand name AquaGuard) to treat the municipal water supply. My uncle has a reverse-osmosis based water treatment system (Brandname Rivera) to produce 4 gallons of potable water from his well.

    If you compare how many days one has to work to earn a washing machine, a fridge, an a/c, a digital camcorder or a digital camera you would find that these things balace out the cheap maid, medical service, hair cuts etc.

    As a rule, all labour intensive services/products are very very cheap. All material intensive things are high priced or down right unaffordable. Especially imported things like dental drills or digital cameras. My brother-in-law pays the full exchange price of 45 Rs/$ to import dental drills and other dental equipment. His patients pay him hardly 1$ per cleaning or 2$ per extraction. Ouch!

    That is why the economists use a basket of goods and services and they hope, statistically, with a comprehensive basket, they can figure the true "purchasing power" of local currencies. Since they are economists, they argue endlessly over every component of the basket and the weightages.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  145. apparently by weierstrass · · Score: 1

    the original (Robert Brenner's) source is an interview with John C. Bogle, somewhere on the web, but I haven't been able to track it down.

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
  146. What's good for Bill Gates... by DocBones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple has never been a huge H1-B backer, but Bill Gates is MR. H1-B. He's now lobbying Congress to allow in almost unlimited numbers of foreign programmers - anyone with an American Masters degree, e.g. How they will flock! What Bill wants, Congress rushes to do, and Bill has always loved flocking American programmers!

    Doc

    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/05/26/visas / (may require your sitting through a sponsor's animated ad)

    What's good for Bill Gates...

    The Microsoft mogul says America needs more foreign engineers and programmers to compete. Critics say it's all about cheap labor.

    By Rebecca Clarren
    Salon Magazine ...

    Generally, industry lobbyists are quick with statistics and reports, but in this case it appears they weren't needed. Neither Microsoft nor Intel would reveal how many Ph.D.s or master's students they hired last year, and how many they need for next year. When the companies and their lobbyists were asked what data and reports they showed Congress to convince them of the need for these new visas, they reported that they don't have any reports and statistics. Marcus Courtney, president of WashTech/CWA, a tech workers union, says as long as they have Bill Gates on their side, "they don't need to use anything to substantiate their arguments."

    "William Gates was in Washington, lobbying -- a pretty high-priced lobbyist -- to come talk about the needs of Microsoft, a marvelous company, high-tech, enormous advances for America -- he wants more people with Ph.D.s and wants a larger quota of visas for those people to come in," Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the bill's author, told Salon when asked what data the industry had shown him. "We have accommodated that. And we have created more opportunities for people to come in who are students."

    Such ardor for Gates flows from both sides of the aisle. When asked about reports and data presented to convince Democrats on the Judiciary Committee that the U.S. didn't have the workforce it needed to fill these jobs, Tracy Schmaler, spokesperson for the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, responded: "Did you know Bill Gates has been pretty high-profile on this?"

    Critics of the bill, mainly academics and those who represent American tech workers, say they have no voice on this issue; that Congress has been blinded by campaign contributions of big companies. In 2004, Microsoft alone spent $9.46 million on lobbying and hired 16 different firms; it listed immigration as one of its top issues on lobbying disclosure forms, according to data from the nonprofit Center for Responsive Politics. That same year, computer and Internet industries spent $70.5 million on lobbying.

    "There is no greater case study to understand corporate power in politics," says Courtney of the tech workers union. "I could give you 75 reports that prove that H-1B is a horribly flawed program that hurts American workers, but it doesn't matter. As long as Bill Gates says there's a shortage, and that's it, thanks for playing, game over, try again next session."

    1. Re:What's good for Bill Gates... by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Do you realize most of the opponents of this bill are academics. They are opposing it as it allows foreign students to work off campus while they are studying on F1 visas. That would pretty much mean a drying up of the large pool of slave labour that most universities depend on for running their campuses aka Graduate Students. Go to any professors research lab in Engineering and Science and you would find it full of Indian and Chinese students. Some may actually like working for the professor but a lot of them do it to pay for their degrees as they are not allowed to work off campus while they are studying. So Professors get away with paying salaries which pretty much qualifies these students for welfare (only as foreigners they cant claim welfare so they live on Ramen). These are people with bachelors degrees, great academic records and in many cases prior work experience. If these students are allowed to work off campus companies would scoop them up and no professor could get away with being abusive. No wonder academics are opposing the bill for it would mean the end of getting research grants from the federal government , getting the work done using cheap Indian and Chinese students and going for Ultimate Frisbee games with their American students.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:What's good for Bill Gates... by DocBones · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but with so many experienced American programmers and engineers unemployed or underemployed, I don't see the benefit of bringing many more permanent workers into the pool from abroad.

      The U.S. deliberately produces way too many technical PhDs, with the result that graduates spend years as relatively low-payed post-docs, and have extreme difficulty getting suitable permanent positions.

      I think qualified Americans, many of whom are ethnically Chinese or Indian, should have first shot at what jobs exist.

      It's just amazing that the lawyer-politicians who set up all these visa programs somehow always forget to bring in foreign lawyers along with the techies. Salaries for lawyers have sky-rocketed, and I would advise any young person to look at a career there before any technical field.

      I'm also unclear on the value of transferring our most valuable technical knowledge to China, surely our number one potential enemy in the future. Bill Gates is certainly keen on it, and of course just had the Chinese premier over for a nice dinner.

      Doc

  147. And moves to China by heroine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These articles don't often mention it, but when companies move out of India it's because Indians are too expensive and Chinese are now the cost winners.

  148. no, really, spare us the elitism by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Poor choices in life are no excuse for being a failure. I mean beyond the possibility of illness the thing mentioned in the parent comment are all things you would have control over at one point.

    Hardly.

    If you some how thought it was resonable to purchase a little condo for $1.5 million

    Of course it is, because like any card carrying elitist libertarian asshole, you busted your ass to get into Harvard's business school and graduated at the top of your class. Now all your hard work has gotten you a VP position at a corporation, you make 300k a year, have all your school loans paid off and enough money saved up for several years worth of bills. Real estate is insanely expensive in your area, but you don't want to live in a hovel with roomates, so you buy a nice little condo for $1.5 million, which is perfectly reasonable given your salary and the size of your savings.

    If you can't figure out how to make a marriage work, or are a poor judge of people then once again I don't feel any sympathy. There are families in the united states that survive on just over minimum wage with little governmental assistance. If you ever pulled down $300k a year and find yourself in hard times, you pretty much fucked up and probably should be allowed to handle your personal finances anymore.

    Obviously you are a card carrying elitist libertarian asshole who has never had a run of bad luck. When you do have that run of bad luck, and need a hand to get back on your feet, I hope the only people you find are also card carrying elitist libertarian assholes that slap you in the face instead.

    1. Re:no, really, spare us the elitism by xero314 · · Score: 1

      so you buy a nice little condo for $1.5 million, which is perfectly reasonble given your [$300k a year] salary and the size of your savings [enough money saved up for several years worth of bill].

      See that there is the problem, people think 5 time their yearly income is a reasonable amount to pay for a home. And if you have enough money saved up for several years worth of bills I just don't see how you go from there to broken. What could possibly happen, outside of illness which I exempted earlier, that could cause your cost of living to rise so much that your savings is useless? The only think I can think of is still poor financial and personal choices.

      Obviously you are a card carrying elitist libertarian asshole...

      My associates would laugh at that, but hey one out of 3 ain't bad. If you read through any of my other posts you will see I am the exact opposite of an "elitist libertarian," but since I live in a capitalist society I have learn how to make sure my family is well taken care of. I still don't see how you can go from making $300k a year to living on the street without managing your money poorly. I could pay of my house (which is certainly not a small condo) and still have plenty to spare if I had $300k. This is why I am not libertarian, I don't think most of the public have the where-with-all to handle their own finances. If people weren't allowed to blow their lifes earnings on million dollar condos the whole of society would have a hell of a lot more to share. Next thing you will be telling me is there is justification for multi-million dollar a year earners like some musicians and athletes to end up bankrupt.

      When you do have that run of bad luck, and need a hand to get back on your feet, I hope the only people you find are also card carrying elitist libertarian assholes that slap you in the face instead.

      I have been down on my luck a few times in my life (mind you this was when I was much younger and made $20-30k at the most), but I stayed on my feet because of the personal decisions I made, like always being there for my friends and family, and not giving up on them when they were having hard times, so they helped me out when I needed it. But I assume that someone who refers to the mother of his children and wife of 8 years as a "psychopathic bitch" probably doesn't do much to help out what little they have in the way of friends and family.

    2. Re:no, really, spare us the elitism by Buran · · Score: 1

      When you do have that run of bad luck, and need a hand to get back on your feet, I hope the only people you find are also card carrying elitist libertarian assholes that slap you in the face instead.

      Wow, with a "screw you" attitude like that, I wonder who would want to help you? Whatever happened to helping people in need, no matter who they were? Oh yeah. It's all "me first" these days. Sad...

    3. Re:no, really, spare us the elitism by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Wow, with a "screw you" attitude like that, I wonder who would want to help you? Whatever happened to helping people in need, no matter who they were? Oh yeah. It's all "me first" these days. Sad...

      No. If guys like him are going to be assholes to people that fail to anticipate the future with perfection, then they can screw off when shit happens to them, too. Hoist on their own petards, as they say. Or "reap what you sow" if you prefer.

      For example, I do have sympathy for people who need to take perscription painkillers for a genuine medical need, but end up becoming addicted in the process. Unless said adict happens to be a sack of shit like Rush Limbagh, who has stated that all drug addicts belong in jail. What's good for the goose is good for the gander: his ass should have been thrown in jail for the maximum sentance allowed.

    4. Re:no, really, spare us the elitism by ScrewYouTroll · · Score: 0

      screw you.

  149. I concur by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    In 2003 I moved from the UK to the US. My income is up about 2.5 times (even considering the poor exchange rate) although I've been pretty lucky. My state and federal income taxes run me somehting like 11% of income, and even after paying for healthcare, I'm way ahead.

    It's not hard to find good beer and imported cheese here, but the bread thing pisses me off - i end up baking my own.

    Plus the weather is great and gas prices are fantastic :)

  150. People have always struggled in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people have always struggled to find good, well paying and secure jobs in India. Even IT folk. It does not need an American company to teach them what it is like to lose one's job. This is not payback. This is just business as usual. It just happens to be Apple that is doing the firing.

  151. Re: Reasonable statement, on topic- not flamebait. by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    Thanks. I don't think that this "community" understands the ramifications of this situation.

  152. You obviously don't live in california by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

    If you don't want to be living one mortgage payment from being out on the street, DON'T! Learn to live within your means.... Buy a house where you can pay your mortgage payment and then some, or rent a place you can afford.

    Out in california, if you have a family, you'll find there really isn't any affordable housing... and depending on the field you work in, there may not be job opportunities elsewhere.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:You obviously don't live in california by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you mean. Having a family doesn't cost anything, it's breeding that's one of our society's most expensive hobbies.

  153. Re:If wages were the same in all countries... by rduke15 · · Score: 1

    [...]you'd probably be able to afford fewer toys, but I am pretty sure you would not starve to death.

    Even though this woudld seem the only reasonable long-term possibility, I'm afraid we are already too many to achieve decent living for all, even without any toys.

    It is well-known that if everyone were to live like Americans and Europeans, we would need around 3 planets.

    How much does the standard need to be lowered to fairly feed and provide energy to 6.5 billion people? Is it even still possible?

  154. Re:When you fire someone that means you have faile by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    :..
    I think some people feel that because India is a long way away those employees don't matter. Only a sick kind of employer would feel that way. Once you hire someone you owe it to them to make it work


    I have seen this at at least 2 employers that I worked for. One of them was AOL. Mainly we are commidites and if you dont do your job and screw up you need to be fired and replaced with someone else as quick as possible. This is true regardless of the %60 turnover rate within 90 days. Needless to say I quit IT for now

  155. Workers Of The World, UNITE !!! by slyrobber · · Score: 1

    Except lets keep democracy this time and NOT succumb to the Fascists of any philosophy. If we can have a world economy we MUST also give workers the same rights regardless of where they reside. The right to assemble and form unions must be undeniable. Globalization must not be just a global shell game for a wealthy Fascist aristocracy.

    1. Re:Workers Of The World, UNITE !!! by wandering_nomad_101 · · Score: 1

      Tell this to the sweat shops in Phonom Phen that are protesting because of the working conditions to manufacture crap for the US consumer. There is nothing democratic about globalization and working conditions. WTO is another reason to screw the 3rd world with high prices medicines from the US to the point that people cannot afford the costs and die because of the lack of inexpensive alternatives. Good ole American free enterprise...

    2. Re:Workers Of The World, UNITE !!! by slyrobber · · Score: 1

      That goes exactly in line with the point I was making. Thank you. But it isn't limited to workers in Fascia-Communist regimes that have embraced a hybrid neo-liberalist philosophy a la China. It also applies to first second and third world "free-market" economies that use Globalization to play shell games with the average Joe, or Pierre, or Vito or Petre, or Hanse or Coomar etc. etc.

  156. 120,000/year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you couldn't even afford a house in new york city on that salary. you'd be a slave to the landlords still.
    welcome to the real world.

  157. $120K/yr -- any midwestern city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, not any midwestern city. I live in Chicago, and I'm pulling down $110K/yr. My wife is in graduate school. 6 years ago I could have bought a house here for $300K or so, but now if I want to live somewhere other than a bungalow in da hood then I'd have to cough up $650K+.

    The crazy thing is that I make a helluva lot more $$ than probably 2 million people in this city, but if I want to have a kid, pay for my kid's college, and have enough $ saved so I don't get screwed if someone in my family ever gets really sick and can't work... well, I still feel constrained.

    Sure, you can live in corn-country nowhere IL where there are zero jobs and buy a house for $80K, but if you want to live somewhere with opportunities then you gotta cough up a lot of dough. I agree that there are some people who probably earn less than $120K, get a huge mortgage, and can get burned hard if the economy ever turns for the worse and they lose their jobs. If you want to have some security and protect yourself from that possibility then $120K doesn't look like a fortune anymore. Sure, I'm making $110K now, but I can lose my job AT ANY MOMENT. And then what? I think I'm a good coder, but what if there's an economic downturn? Maybe the only job I'll be able to find is writing php for some shitty company or taking care of win2k SMB/CIFS file and print servers and AD at some small businesses... I don't necessarily expect that it will happen next year or the year after, but I would not be surprised at all if I lose my job at any moment. Hey, I'm overpaid -- there are programmers in India, Brazil, Russia... who could do my job.

  158. weird by purrdeta · · Score: 1

    I always wonder what prompts apple to do what they do. Like writing a rude letter to a 9 year old girl who was just trying to be helpful. Come on she is 9!

    1. Re:weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad you couldn't get the story right.

      It wasn't a rude letter, it was the same one that gets returned to anyone sending in an idea for products/services. No major company can afford not to, since if they eventually develop a product that resembles in any way someone's suggestion, they could (and several have) end up in court defending against a lawsuit.

      Yeah, someone might have noted the hand-scrawled nature and responded a bit differently, the response made wasn't out of line, nor rude to anyone who wasn't hypersensitive about their little baby.

      It would have been a non-issue had not the mother gone nonlinear and ended up bringing in the local
      newspaper.

    2. Re:weird by purrdeta · · Score: 1

      hehe whatever. At least I am not afraid to make mistakes or reveal my identity to the public. :)

  159. USA is the least fiscally responsible country by Savantissimo · · Score: 1
    The US is presently running a huge budget deficit, but in contrast to the other countries I mentioned, economic growth is more than sufficient to make up for it. US government debt as a proportion of GDP is trending downwards

    THe government is cooking the books on the deficit, the debt, the CPI, GDP and unemployment statistics. For information on how this is done and estimates of the true numbers, see: John Williams' articles.

    Walter J. "John" Williams was born in 1949. He received an A.B. in Economics, cum laude, from Dartmouth College in 1971, and was awarded a M.B.A. from Dartmouth's Amos Tuck School of Business Administration in 1972, where he was named an Edward Tuck Scholar. During his career as a consulting economist, John has worked with individuals as well asFortune 500 companies.

    Quotes from one of his articles:
    Federal Deficit Reality

    As detailed in this article, the actual annual shortfall in U.S. government operations for fiscal year 2003 (September 30) was $3.7 trillion. Put in perspective, that means if the U.S. Treasury had seized all wages and salaries in 2003 with a 100% income tax, there still would have been a deficit!....

    As brief background, the $3.7 trillion number is from government financial statements prepared using generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and a large portion of the expanded deficit is from the annual increase in the net present value of unfunded Social Security and Medicare obligations. ....

    According to the Treasury's 2003 financial statement, the U.S. government has a negative net worth of $34.8 trillion. That $34.8 trillion reflects $36.2 trillion in financial liabilities offset by $1.4 trillion in assets, of which only $0.4 trillion are liquid.

    Part of the underlying reality-the actual operating cash shortfall-is reflected in the growth of the federal debt. During fiscal 2003, for example, gross federal debt increased from $6.2 trillion to $6.8 trillion, or by $600 billion, against the unified $374 billion deficit. As of the end of August 2004, the debt had increased to $7.3 trillion. ....

    With 2003 gross domestic product (GDP) (annual average for the government's fiscal year) at $10.83 trillion, that places the annual budget deficit and total government obligations at respectively 34.2% and 334.3% of GDP, negative extremes never before breached outside the environment of third-world, net-debtor nations....

    As of August 2004, Fitch gave the "AAA" rating to only 15 countries, including the United States. The other 14 are Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Of those 14, five ran budget surpluses in 2003, including Canada, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. The worst deficit as a percent of GDP was for France at 4.1%, followed by Germany at 3.5%. In contrast, the not-generally-recognized GAAP U.S. deficit in 2003 was 34.2%.

    Similarly, the highest level of debt to GDP seen among the 14 other "AAA" countries is at 75.6% for Canada, followed by France at 71.1%, Germany at 65.1% and Austria at 64.9%, versus a GAAP ratio of total financial obligations to GDP of 334.3% for the United States. The low ratio among the "AAA" countries is Luxembourg at 4.9%.

    Where most of the other "AAA" countries have significant unfunded social insurance liabilities that are not included in the debt-to-GDP ratios, consistent 2003 numbers are not available. As a rough estimate, the high ratios mentioned for Canada, France, Germany and Austria would increase by two-to-three times, still well shy of the U.S. extreme.

    I think we need to acknowledge how far from fiscal conservatism this supposedly conservative bunch in the Congress and the Executive really are. The difference is that runn

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  160. This makes sense - Steve Jobs is a perfectionist by Afroblanco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From everything I've read about Steve Jobs, this makes a lot of sense.

    Here you have a man who is a total perfectionist. Obsessed with quality, down to the very last detail.

    My guess is that some high-up Businesshead Suit Guy whispered in his ear, "Y'know, Steve, we could save a lot of money by outsourcing...."

    Steve was probably reluctant at first, but then the Businesshead Suit Guy hyped it up with a bunch of Thomas-Friedman-speak, "This mind-blowing business practice will revolutionize how the world does business, like what corned beef did to sliced bread! Everybody and their brother is doing it! You don't want to be the guy who invented the pet rock! You want to be the guy who invented the pet WORLD! Don't get left behind! Outsource, outsource, outsource!"

    Steve was probably like, "Oh, alright, I'll give it a shot. We'll start small, and see how it goes."

    So he commits a small amount of money to his India project. Lo and behold, what he gets back is crap, and he's like, "What is this? This is crap! The quality is terrible! There are a million little widgets that are all in the wrong place. This little graphic thing was off by a whole 5 millimeters. 5 millimeters! My customers will hate it! I can't even get anyone on the damn phone to fix it! Every time I want bring someone to task over this, all they can talk about is their damn contract! Hey Businesshead Suit Guy? Where the hell are you?"

    Unfortunately, Businesshead Suit Guy is nowhere to be found. He took the big fat bonus that he got from saving the company so much money through outsourcing, and is off vacationing someplace exotic.

    Possibly even in India. I've heard that money goes a lot further down there.

  161. Re:This makes sense - Steve Jobs is a perfectionis by MacDaffy · · Score: 1

    Steve isn't that bad (and anyone who makes a corned beef reference to him would probably get a foot in the ass).

    However, the post isn't that far off from what probably happened--and this is no reflection on the quality of engineering in India. The ability to insure quality, adherence to specifications, and observance of scheduling requirements becomes much more difficult when management, engineering, marketing, and quality aren't co-located. I worked on a project where the engineering team was in Ireland and everyone else was in California. It finally made more sense--was cheaper--to pack up the engineers and the managers, fly them to our site, and finish the project. We made a bullpen for them in one of the conference rooms (they were only allowed access to the cafeteria) and got to work.

    The product that resulted still works over ten years later.

  162. Re:$40 is actually 80$ by mkopparam · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a lot of wrong numbers floating around here... Let me set a few things right. The average Indian salary in the non-tech sector is around 80USD. This is for a guy who's got a few years of experience behind him. The average for somebody who's put in about twenty or thirty years is about twice as much (175USD). 80USD also happens to be the official minimum wage for any government employee - the guy who sweeps the streets, the people who work at government offices, post offices, utilities etc., make that in a month. The new economy brought about a lot of changes as far as salaries go - you could be young, very young indeed and earn in a month what most people do in ten. So the guy above who makes 800$ a month is actually an overpaid fish. Fish? They work in these big glass walled buildings (supposedly to reflect the buildings in Silicon Valley) with their airconditioners on while the rest of the country breathes fresh air out open windows. But that's another story. So does the guy who earns 80$ a month starve and live in penury as some other thread here seems to follow? No, not at all. Costs in India are low: food, clothing and shelter cost almost nothing. The guy on 80$ a month probably has his own house, a motorbike, eats out regularly, watches movies a lot, puts his two kids to school and still saves money for his retirement. Now the guy who's earning 800$ a month has to keep up appearances and buy a fancy overpriced apartment, overpriced car, eat at overpriced restaurants and so on until he hasn't much left to keep. So we have here the irony of the whole situation the tortoise keeps slogging away at his minimalist salary but his job goes on forever while the hare earns quick and burns quicker with his job on the line all the time. A lot has changed in Bangalore - prices have gone through the roof, property has become dear, peak hour traffic is tremendous but all have their own levels of making a life. I noticed another thread here that mentioned that the middle class guy in India lives terribly but that's according to western standards of living, hygiene and circumstance. The middle class guy with a steady job and salary in India today, is king, whatever you might think about it.

  163. Apple Pulls Out of India? by dastardly_villain · · Score: 1

    Hey, Apple, didn't we tell you that pulling out is not an effective form of birth control? Use a condom!

  164. Re:When you fire someone that means you have faile by jax9999 · · Score: 1

    I currently work tech support, and I know I'm not even a number. I am simply a slot that any marble can roll into. I don't matter in any way what so ever to the company as a whole. I've haad it made evident to myself in so many ways its not funny. A higher up once told me and a class full of trainees to stop asking questions because there were a thousand people waiting for our jobs. He is now stocking shelves at the dollarama, fired for fucking an inferior in a board room. When I see him I fight the urge to spit in his face. NOw this was a few years ago, and I've since learned that those 1000 that were waiting for my job are a joke. They are running out of people to hire that arent yokels. They burned through the degreed people first (my group) then the trainables, now they have nothing left to hire from but the bottom of the barrell... anyone with any mind in their head won't work here. Its kind of funny.

  165. Re:When you fire someone that means you have faile by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Not funny if the only way to suceed in IT is start at help desk :-(

    OR worse doing repair where your employer can rip you off. Otherwise they wont consider you for any other job. At least not in Florida where I live.

    I can't wait to get my degree so I dont have to take such jobs and I can explain my worth. Its hard to prove you once worked in IT before the .bomb and know yoru stuff when you work for 7/hr jobs for several years. I was hoping the AOL help desk would save me. The handle time requirements were unreal and it was about talking very fast and being incorrect to get people to hang up on you. Not about solving problems which would take more than 9 minutes. Especially those with malware infested machines that take 15 minutes to boot up while you wait in fear looking at the clock ... shudder.

  166. Re:When you fire someone that means you have faile by jax9999 · · Score: 1

    ah the good ole days when I was on msn dielup (intentionally misspelled to use the word die) We had a 9 minute handle time, and if you went above that they would literally break into the call and tell you to get off it. We were encoureged to lie, to cheat, to basically do anything to get the customer off the phone. Password resets took 24 hours, it was always aols fault.. ah the good ole days. used to throw up blood back then. I don't actually care anymore so now, I don't.

  167. Free market drones have tunnel vision by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    You already lost this debate because there is nothing to the universe beyond supply and demand. If it doesn't fit within that narrow equation, it's simply not valid. :)

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  168. Probe it. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Probe that the US middle class (if you can define it consitently for all points in space and time) is shrinking.

    There is no serious economist that would back such howgash.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  169. You Sir need to learn some economics. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Wages can never ever converge up. That is an stupid and ignorant statment based on wishful thinking and not in simple common sense.

    If you have a wage differential, all else being equal, the people with the lower wages will have a competitive advantage.

    The people with the higher wages will need to lower them in order to compete.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  170. Ask and ye shall receive by Travoltus · · Score: 1
    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!