Slashdot Mirror


SCO to Unix developers, We want you back

NoGuffCheck writes "CRN is reporting that Darl McBride is looking to get Unix developers back onboard with cash incentives for completing training in SCO's new mobile application kit; EdgeBuilder. It doesn't stop there; there's a 12-cylinder BMW or $100,000 dollars for the development of the best wireless application."

427 comments

  1. Ah, but there's a catch... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 5, Funny

    * All developers are required to pay their $699 SCO licensing fees at the door.

    1. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by The+Snowman · · Score: 5, Funny
      All developers are required to pay their $699 SCO licensing fees at the door.

      It isn't a licensing fee. It's the price of paying the SCO lottery! For the low low price of $699, you have a chance at one of several fabulous prizes including $100k, a luxury car, and a night of terror on Darl's private yacht complete with built-in dungeon! Fun for the whole family!

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    2. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Luring a developer to code for your products: $100,000 and a BMW.
      Finding out developers still hate you passionately: Priceless

      - G

    3. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Goblez · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Hahaha, this is the truth right here. Who else read this title and thought (In the words of the great Borat) "F*#k To You". Alienate the whole *nix community, and then try to bribe them back. That'll ensure you get the 'right' people on your team.

      Well . . . maybe right for SCO

      --
      - Kal`Goblez
    4. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Do developers hate them? You may be prepared to find that the supposed hatred is all talk when a recently-laid off developer gets a new car wafted under his nose.

    5. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by IAmTheDave · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Aw, baby... look, you know I didn't mean to hurt you. It's just... sometimes I get so angry. You make me really angry sometimes. But I love you - I love you. I won't hurt you again, I PROMISE. I'm going to get help.

      "Yeah, I know it's happened before, but it won't happen again - I swear! Come back home baby."

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    6. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by peragrin · · Score: 5, Informative

      In order to get that car you need to sign a contract with SCO. Any code you develop belongs to SCO because any code that runs on unix is a derivative work. Oh and Contracts are what you use againist your friends.

      Yes SCO is claiming such things in both the court of public opinion and sometimes in the court as well.

      Any laid off developer would be better off collecting unemployment and staying out of SCO's lawyers reach.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      I find that my hatred is more of a commodity -- I produce loads of it for companies like SCO and Microsoft, and they buy it from me. Only in this market, the law of supply is inverted: the greater the supply of hatred, the greater the cost.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    8. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Too bad he's laid off and won't be able to afford gas for it.

    9. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      There's some things money can't buy...

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    10. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by RedneckJack · · Score: 0

      To get a chance to get the BMW/$100,000; you must sell your soul to the SCO Corporate Overlords !

    11. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unix developers to SCO: Die in a fire.

      (We want the insurance money)

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    12. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by alexfromspace · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly. Furthermore, if you read the fine print on the other side of the second appendix to the last page of the contract, it says that SCO, in addition to owning you, will also own your wife, children, dog, truck and home, because they are all your derivatives. Although the wife has a legal option to divorce and seek custody of the children, the SCO also realises that this may be bound by any prenuptual agreements, and they reserve the right to challenge any such 'weak' and 'inconvincing' prenuptual agreement in various courts.

    13. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by NickFortune · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You may be prepared to find that the supposed hatred is all talk when a recently-laid off developer gets a new car wafted under his nose.

      Ooooh... I don't think anyone's prepared to find that. 'course I don't think it's going to happen, so the preparedness probably isn't an issue.

      I expect that they'll probably find people to come work for them. Not because of any automobile inspired conversion on the road to Damascus, but just because some people will be desperate enough to work for someone they hate. But they'd have to be desperate. And if they're wise they'll get they're money up front, because SCO probably won't have anything to pay them with by the time development finishes.

      Only of course they can't can they? Because it's a "prize", and you don't award prizes until the end. So I guess they'd have to be gullible as well as desperate.

      I still don't think anyone's going to stop hating them though.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    14. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developers may not hate SCO because of their actions toward Linux, but they'll hate them because SCO UNIX is utter crap.

    15. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if it's a BMW M5 (that I would not get taxed for, SCO would have to pay all taxes and registration fees and I would have to have the clear title, AND they would have to disable the rev limiter so it will go at least as fast as my other cars) and $100K base salary, AND there is no requirement for staying X period of time or give back the M5, I'd do it. I would continue to run Linux on my own machines though, and wouldn't stay at SCO for very long. I'd just not admit to having worked there for X period of time.

      "So what did you do for six months?"
      "I goofed off, traveled a bit. I really needed a breather."

    16. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

      >Luring a developer to code for your products: $100,000 and a BMW.
      >Finding out developers still hate you passionately: Priceless


      Or perhaps this:
      Luring a developer to code for your products: $100,000 and a BMW.
      That developer discovering the $100,000 almost covers personal legal fees and finding out the BMW was hacked to run on SCO: Priceless

      --
      This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
    17. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by mknewman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This has got to be the most schizophrenic company I've ever seen.

    18. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Danse · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I expect that they'll probably find people to come work for them. Not because of any automobile inspired conversion on the road to Damascus, but just because some people will be desperate enough to work for someone they hate. But they'd have to be desperate.

      I'm sure that they might get some desperate people, but I also think they'll get some ignorant people, and some people who share their lack of ethics.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    19. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by badasscat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who else read this title and thought (In the words of the great Borat) "F*#k To You".

      I just thought it must have been missing a few words:

        SCO to Unix developers: We want (to shoot) you (in the) back

    20. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure there's enough computer programmers out there that don't know about the whole SCO fiasco that they would gladly go and work for them. Probably not any programmers with real Unix/Linux experience, but there are a lot of developers out there who don't know about this stuff. Not everybody reads slashdot.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    21. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True right until they Google SCO.
      How many developers will go to work for a company without typing their name into Google.
      How many people with ANY experience with Unix don't know about SCO.
      Finally there is a major danger having SCO in our work history. Even if they loose this law suite which I bet they will someone will buy the SCO IP. Would you risk hiring a developer that worked for a company that filed such outlandish IP based law suites? Not everyone has the deep pockets of IBM.
      I think that working for SCO might just be too dangerous for just about anyone to risk.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    22. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by raygundan · · Score: 1

      Slashdot readers: It's a Trap!

    23. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by lspd · · Score: 1, Redundant

      You may be prepared to find that the supposed hatred is all talk when a recently-laid off developer gets a new car wafted under his nose.

      Hell, if they were giving out free cars, I'd write a piece of software to collect mine. They're only offering the chance to win a car though. If I wanted a chance to win a car I'd attend one of those stupid time-share seminars. If some recently laid-off developer is basing their financial survival on winning a BMW from SCO...well...it's no wonder they're unemployed.

      OTOH, I can download Debian for the chance at winning a free operating system...and I win every time.

    24. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by WarmBoota · · Score: 1

      A.K.A. The Ike Turner strategy

      --
      90% of everything is crap. Also, crap is relative.
    25. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by artifex2004 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Aw, baby... look, you know I didn't mean to hurt you. It's just... sometimes I get so angry. You make me really angry sometimes. But I love you - I love you. I won't hurt you again, I PROMISE. I'm going to get help.
      "Yeah, I know it's happened before, but it won't happen again - I swear! Come back home baby."


      Once again I am beaten to the punch.

    26. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

      The BMW M5 has a V-10 engine. The prize car would probably be a 760i or 760Li, since they are the only cars that BMW currently sells with a V-12 engine.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
      - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    27. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Snowmit · · Score: 1
      Although the wife has a legal option to divorce and seek custody of the children, the SCO also realises that this may be bound by any prenuptual agreements, and they reserve the right to challenge any such 'weak' and 'inconvenient' prenuptual agreement in various courts.

      Fixed.

      --
      I have a lot of opinions about Cyborgs and Architects
    28. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by drsquare · · Score: 1
      In order to get that car you need to sign a contract with SCO. Any code you develop belongs to SCO


      Same as any other developing job then?
    29. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      Unix developers to SCO: Die in a fire.

      (We want the insurance money)


      Personaly I wouldn't be so P.C. about it. Something like 'FSCK You' works. Ok. You can say the F word :-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    30. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Goblez · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, precisely!

      --
      - Kal`Goblez
    31. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by sconeu · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Great pun! Mod parent funny!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    32. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by NickFortune · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I also think they'll get some ignorant people, and some people who share their lack of ethics.

      I think they'd still have to be pretty gullible or very foolish. I really don't think anyone's going to get paid for their work here.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    33. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by G+Morgan · · Score: 1

      Where you say crap others would say classical. Of course more people would say deprecated.

    34. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by budgenator · · Score: 1, Informative

      I was on fire six weeks ago you insensitive clod; I remember putting out the flames, I remember pulling my hand out of the water, the ten or 15 seconds in between is like they didn't exist.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    35. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by budgenator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just think about how good it will look on your resume when you apply for a job as a developer in the Linux shop down the street!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    36. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by NickFortune · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Probably not any programmers with real Unix/Linux experience,

      Aye, there's the rub!

      there are a lot of developers out there who don't know about this stuff.

      See, if they were finding it easy to hire coders of the required standard, then they'd hardly need to pull a stunt like this one in order to attract talent. And if they are having problems todays job market where there are still coders unemployed from the dot bomb crash, then I suspect word must have pretty much permeated the *nix community.

      Unless of course the whole thing is purely a scam to bilk developers out of their fees. That I might believe.

      Personally I think I'm tending toward Option C: "Both of the above"

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    37. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Redundant

      * All developers are required to pay their $699 SCO licensing fees at the door.

      Those cocksmoking teabaggers!

      Sorry, I couldn't resist.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    38. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      If some recently laid-off developer is basing their financial survival on winning a BMW from SCO...well...it's no wonder they're unemployed.

      Plus you can't pay the bills with a car, either. And as fans of Oprah discovered, the tax and registration on a car (and theirs weren't 'expensive' cars) still adds up when you can't afford the car to begin with. So prizes like that are only good for the people who are getting by on their own already.

    39. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even if they loose this law suite
      "loose" => "lose"
      "law suite" => "lawsuit"

      Most people won't correct your mistakes. But we will silently think less of you.
    40. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by alexfromspace · · Score: 1
      I'm sure that they might get some desperate people, but I also think they'll get some ignorant people, and some people who share their lack of ethics.


      Those would roughly be the ones that know how to use the VB6 wizards to do _almost_ anything and can make it work on Unix. Way to go SCO! Make your next great VB6 app exclusively for Unix. Reward $100,000 for the first to write "hello world".

    41. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      And if they are having problems todays job market where there are still coders unemployed from the dot bomb crash

      Huh? Where? I'm in Austin, and the competent coders have been long since reemployed.

      We've gotten a few good hires lately, but it's much harder than it used to be -- and there've been far more poaching attempts (some successful) on our existing staff.

    42. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      I also think they'll get some ignorant people, and some people who share their lack of ethics.

      Hmmm, maybe this explains the recent exodus from Microsoft.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    43. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by afaik_ianal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pointless comment! Mod parent redundant!

      What's that smell? Ahh crap... I think it's both our karmas burning. :(

    44. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should we ASK how it was you happened to catch on fire? Nothing personal, but was there alcohol involved? (fuel OR beverage?)

    45. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you risk hiring a developer that worked for a company that filed such outlandish IP based law suites? Not everyone has the deep pockets of IBM.

      Uh, yes. If they're a good developer. Who wouldn't? Your argument makes no sense, unless you think that the developers decide if and when to file lawsuits.

      If you're going to make business decisions (such as hiring decisions) out of an irrational dislike for SCO ("He worked for SCO and SCO is bad, and therefore he is bad no matter what.") then you've got just as much to learn about business as SCO's management.

      Now if you'd been talking about hiring someone on SCO's board of directors, that'd perhaps been a sane argument.

    46. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You always take the money and then write unsupportable code...let them own that.

    47. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, I claim that AIX is "classical" as well.

    48. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Meski · · Score: 1
      True right until they Google SCO.
      Shameful admission: I'm a Windows developer, and I know of and hate them.

      How many developers will go to work for a company without typing their name into Google.

      It's part of the application process, IMO.

      How many people with ANY experience with Unix don't know about SCO. Finally there is a major danger having SCO in our work history. Even if they loose this law suite which I bet they will someone will buy the SCO IP. Would you risk hiring a developer that worked for a company that filed such outlandish IP based law suites? Not everyone has the deep pockets of IBM. I think that working for SCO might just be too dangerous for just about anyone to risk.

      And another Windows developer is born. :)
    49. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      I'm in the UK. There's no problem if you're willing to work on MS kit, but I'd hate to still be trying to earn a living as a UNIX/Linux contractor. Mind, that's based purely on the numbers of agents calling me, and since I've told most of them I'm off the market, I'm probably getting a distorted impression of the business.

      I still reckon something's amiss if they have to resort to stunts like this one.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    50. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Ahh. Austin is something of a UNIX town -- IBM had and has quite a bit of AIX development located herebouts, and generally UNIXy jobs aren't hard to find.

      I still consider it a Good Thing -- in terms of reflecting both the state of the economy and the level of awareness of SCO's business antics -- that they find it necessary to take this kind of action. As to whether their intent is entirely what they make it out to be, that's admittedly a separate question.

    51. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Competent coders is the key here. During the Dot-Com boom, everybody and their mother could get a job as a programmer provided they knew how to turn on a computer. Then the bust hit, and there was a lot of cleaning up to do. A lot of people who really had no qualifications or skills were stuck without a job. The people who really knew what they were doing never had a problem to begin with. Even during the bust, a lot of competent people were probably laid off when companies went bust, but they found new jobs quickly enough.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    52. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with hating SCO. It is the potential liability that I would worry about. If SCO survives the IBM lawsuit in any form they may decide to go after some lower fruit. Maybe claiming that x product is using SCO's IP since a former SCO developer is working on it. You don't have to loose a lawsuit to loose a ton of money. Often it is cheaper to just settle even if you know that the other side doesn't have a case! Hiring a developer that worked at any lawsuit happy company is dangerous.
      I bet there are some very nice talented people that have worked for SCO or are even still working for SCO. I know that area and jobs are not easy to find so I would bet that some people are staying at SCO just to put food on the table.
      Frankly I think the damage SCO's actions has done to it's own employees is far worse than what they have done to the OSS community. Let's face it if SCO wanted to slow down Linux it has totally failed. Maybe if SCO is totally wiped out and IBM or Novell end up with what ever UNIX IP is left the taint will be gone.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    53. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The car and cash is a prize in a contest. You only get either if you produce something which wins by whatever ever-shifting criteria SCO decide to impose. Oh and you have to use EdgeBuilder SDK, which appears to be part of some dubious MLM business model they're setting up called "Me Inc.".

      When you toss SCO, MLM and prize into the mix, you'd have to be a pretty gung-ho sort of guy to think you're going to see much from it. Besides, the contest doesn't close until 2007. That means unless you put the better part of a year into your app, you don't even stand a chance of winning. May as well get a job if that's the case and be guaranteed of winning. Or write something else and sell it - probably the risk is no less.

    54. Re:Ah, but there's a catch... by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like Microsoft owns all of Adobe's code, because it runs on Windows.

  2. Let me be the first to say by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    BWA HA HAHA

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How is this offtopic? It's the funniest story I've ever read on /.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Let me be the first to say by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      BWA HA HAHA

      Is that the sound of the Devil? I don't know but this sounds like selling your soul to the devil, since they still haven't stopped their legal proceedings, with regards to Linux.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:Let me be the first to say by painQuin · · Score: 1
      Let me be the first to say
      BWA HA HAHA
      please? Just this once? I -never- get first post...
      --
      A guilty conscience means at least you've got one.
    4. Re:Let me be the first to say by ems2 · · Score: 1
  3. What a waste by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is such a waste of their time. Do they really think anyone is going to take them seriously? Sure, a few misguided folks might, but, as far as I know, SCO's reputation is now squat in the tech industry. Besides, the incentives SCO offers probably won't be enough to pay off the lawsuits that SCO will file against you before you've finished your app.

    Perhaps they should create a contest for "most creative way to destroy SCO" or something like that instead. It'd be much more fun. (Although seeing who actually enters this contest might be interesting.)

    1. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I would like to know is why is HP & MySQL helping to finance this?!? What a way to get company blacklisted - especially a GPL project.

    2. Re:What a waste by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dude, most people will do anything for a buck. It's why we have shitty products on the shelves, crap service at every turn, etc, etc. I'm certain SCO could score an entire division of developers within weeks if they simply offer cash money.

      that doesn't mean we have to buy what SCO is selling though!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words: They are up shit creek and this thing is an atempt to buy a paddle.

      But seriously, developers should be staying clear of SCO, because if they can spin up a big ass lawsuit from nothing, imagine what they can do with your contract if you do business with them.

    4. Re:What a waste by malraid · · Score: 5, Funny

      SCO should make a reality show. A reality show about a company going to the ruin. Then we could get people to call in (1-900 number of course) to decide who they are going to sue next. I'm sure it'll be a hit. In fact, I'm of to the patent office right now. That's about the only way I see them making any money.

      --
      please excuse my apathy
    5. Re:What a waste by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      That sounds absolutely awesome. We could do a whole series of SCO shows, like SCO Survivor, where the remaining employees fight each other for control of the company, and they use lawsuits as the competitions. Or SCO Idol, where viewers get to vote for the SCO lawyer with the most ridiculous claim in a lawsuit. The possibilities are endless!

    6. Re:What a waste by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1
      Dude, most people will do anything for a buck.


      Some stuff isn't for sale, e.g. your personal integrity (well, unless you plan on making money by defrauding others, in which case you're bound to either end up in jail or pushing up daisies).

      --
      'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
    7. Re:What a waste by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Informative

      What I would like to know is why is HP & MySQL helping to finance this?!? What a way to get company blacklisted - especially a GPL project.

      I looked at TFA, the SCO contest site, the SCO site, and NONE of it said MySQL or HP was sponsoring this contest. It did say there would be MySQL and HP training at the SCO forum, but that doesn't mean that the training is provided by or sponsored by those companies.

      SCO is trying to promote its alternative to LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) with SCAMP (SCO, Apache, etc.). But because it can easily acquire and redistribute all of these components under the GPL and even offer its own support and training for them, it can make things look official when they're really not.

      I'd need some more evidence than an unsupported post on /. that MySQL is giving any aid or comfort to the enemy before I started modifying my opinion of the company or their software.

      - G

    8. Re:What a waste by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also... I hope the people who do take part realize that by doing so, SCO could claim ownership of every piece of code they ever have written, or ever will write. Give them $100,000 with one hand, sue them for $1.5Mil with the other if anything they ever do makes a profit. That appears to me to be SCO's current MO, and I can't see why they'd change it for this one little competition.

    9. Re:What a waste by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Sure am glad now that I use PostgreSQL instead of that toy db MySQL. MySQL double-sucks in my book now.

    10. Re:What a waste by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Look, if I was unemployed (as I believe I will be after finishing my PhD) I surely would accept (at least try sending my resume) in whatever company I can. In this world (at least that has been in my experience) there is more people than jobs, so if there are jobs that no one wants to do (or places where no one wants to go) I do not care.

      I think a lot of people is in the same place as that, so I wont blame anyone trying to get a job.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    11. Re:What a waste by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Daryl already won that contest. Just give him a few seconds to clean that white powder off his nose, and he will explain what the prize was. Oops, I just gave it away...

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    12. Re:What a waste by larytet · · Score: 1
      completely unrelated - my reverse proxy project is a nice mobile application, access your file from any browser, even text only, like lynx. PDA without Java ? great goMyPlace will work there too.

      unfortunately i do NOT use any of SCO products.

    13. Re:What a waste by mlefevre · · Score: 3, Informative

      Doesn't seem unlikely given that they entered into an agreement with them last year, as reported on Slashdot and elsewhere. The news release about that is on the MySQL site.

    14. Re:What a waste by moexu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd need some more evidence than an unsupported post on /. that MySQL is giving any aid or comfort to the enemy before I started modifying my opinion of the company or their software.

      Here you go:
      http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/news/article_ 948.html

      --
      "Seek first to understand." - Socrates
    15. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misspelled SCAM, unless it's a silent P...

    16. Re:What a waste by FurryFeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here you go. Just click on the "Sponsors" tab.

    17. Re:What a waste by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It would be a mistake to accept this job. Move in with your parents for a few months while you search. I did, and it took me nearly 3 months to find a good job (well, this was a different time, and I was no phd...I went civil service). The time invested was well worth it to all.

      Getting a job from tSCOg on your resume is almost certainly a very poor decision...presuming that they are hiring, which isn't clear to me. It looks more like some kind of "summer of code" look-alike attempt. I.e., my guess is that they hope to ONLY have to pay the prizes and to get lots of code submitted. (OTOH, I've only read summaries, as I wouldn't touch tSCOg with a 10-ft pole.

      P.S.: A note on naming. The company's stock symbol is SCOX, so some refer to it by that name. The company's name is "The SCO Group". They are pretending to be an earlier company SCO (Santa Cruz Operations) which does not deserve to have their name so dragged through the mud, even if they did sell the rights to tSCOg (thus t for THE, SCO for SCO, and g for Group). That company is currently called Tarantella, and they gave up on their Unix business in the face of competition from Linux. They did not morph into this dispicable bunch of sleaze. They are still in business (though they were acquired by Sun...I believe that was last year).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    18. Re:What a waste by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Great idea, I'll make sure SCO hears of it.

      -NetZero Exec

    19. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are not offering cash per-se my guess is the number of places will be limited while point 2 will be a case of "thanks for all your code" all prices will be before tax.

      This is cheap advertising and product development by anyone's standard.

      1. Training in SCO's EdgeBuilder developer kit will be offered at the conference; attendees completing it will be given US$1000.

      2. SCO is also offering a 10-cylinder BMW car or a US$100,000 cash prize for the developers who use the toolkit to produce the best wireless applications. SCO calls it The Edgeclick Developer Challenge.

    20. Re:What a waste by CODiNE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SCO is trying to promote its alternative to LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) with SCAMP (SCO, Apache, etc.).

      Nice name there! I thought you were making that up, but they actually named their product SCAMP. Here it is, straight from my dictionary:

      scamp 1 |skamp| noun informal a person, esp. a child, who is mischievous in a likable or amusing way. a wicked or worthless person; a rogue. DERIVATIVES scampish adjective ORIGIN mid 18th cent.(denoting a highwayman): from obsolete scamp [rob on the highway,] probably from Middle Dutch schampen 'slip away,' from Old French eschamper 'flee the battlefield,' from champ 'field.'

      Wow! Amazing marketing there... sign up today for SCO's highway robbery!

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    21. Re:What a waste by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      I'd need some more evidence than an unsupported post on /. that MySQL is giving any aid or comfort to the enemy
      Then look at this page about SCO Forum 2006. What do you suppose "Gold Sponsor" means?
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    22. Re:What a waste by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds great. One thing though: we're going to need to fire Darl McBride and replace him with Ozzy Ozborne. And Hulk Hogan will be the CFO ... do you think we could get Paris Hilton as head of HR?

      Actually, we'd better be careful; the company might not go into the ground as quickly that way.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    23. Re:What a waste by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      SCO should make a reality show.

      I don't ever watch reality shows under any circumstances, but I'm waiting for a Big Brother series which puts McBride, Ballmer, Gates, RMS and a few people from the RIAA and MPAA in a house together (probably with a few chairs) - I'd watch that. :)

    24. Re:What a waste by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Now all we need is hosting services to start adopting PostgreSql.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    25. Re:What a waste by malraid · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to include DVD Jon in there !

      --
      please excuse my apathy
    26. Re:What a waste by SwellJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HiThere is right about taking a job with shifty companies, but there are a lot of other reasons to simply avoid this kind of deal.

      I've had occasion to deal with good folks and bad in running my own business, sometimes taking on projects I didn't really believe in (not particularly evil or destructive, just not in a direction that I felt was worth pursuing and thus a waste of my time) in order to pay the bills. These projects often promised far bigger returns than more fun, interesting, and good projects. However, in almost every case, I wound up spending more time and money on the project than anticipated and getting less money in the end. The companies footing the bills reneged on promises, disappeared into insolvency, redirected their efforts midway through the project (while I'd turned down other jobs in anticipation of this one being extremely long-term and high demand), etc. Sure, a strong contract (which is often where the first hints of trouble come up--getting the contract signed before work begins is often like pulling teeth with this kind of company...everything is always upbeat and enthusiastic, but discussions are long and fruitless). This is all very vague sounding, I know, but in seven years of running my first business I learned something very important:

      The fact is, if you're doing what you believe in, you're far more likely to make a sustainable living than if you're taking on big money but shifty projects or jobs.

      "Shifty" is the vague bit here. Seemingly large and hugely successful dotcom boom companies have often been the ones that wasted the most of my time and effort and made me feel far less satisfied with my work. On the other hand, one of the more pleasant work experiences was for an internet pornography company. They're probably the largest such company in the world now, but it was relatively small back then. I could tell immediately that the guy running the show was technically savvy, understood his needs very well, and had the authority to sign off on the work and pay for it; and I could see that our work could vastly improve the performance of his website, and thus his customer satisfaction, at a good price. The point is that the good projects and jobs are straightforward, clearly defined, technically sound and interesting, and payment is well-defined (and usually fair--not too high, not too low). Contests, commission-based pay, projects that you can see are clearly foolish and won't generate profit for your client, projects to create one-off software that already has a large market leader in the field with thousands of users, etc. are all warning signs of a bad deal for you no matter how good the payment looks. Further, those who are most ready to give you everything you ask for in initial negotiations are also probably the most difficult to deal with (and least likely to pay you enough to cover the time spent on them, and most likely to cause trouble during the actual contract signing).

      What I'm trying to get at, is that in the real world, you can probably make a living working for people like The SCO Group. But you probably won't enjoy it, you'll probably get paid less than you deserve for the soul-sucking work, and you'll probably lock yourself into doing jobs for companies just like The SCO Group in the future. Not just because you have The SCO Group on your resume, and good tech companies will look down on you for it (which many will), but because your experiences will be in making oddball poorly designed products for a shifty company--the situation will demand that that's what happens with your project, even if you're a great developer. Working for a good company with a good vision leads to good products and your subsequent job offers will get better over time rather than worse. Go for good companies that do things you can believe in, even if you have to start out making less than the shifty company is offering. Working on something great is far more valuable to your longterm economic success than being paid an exhorbitant wage for working

    27. Re:What a waste by entrylevel · · Score: 1

      My cat is named Scamp. Sounds like I should sue them for infringing on my IP!

      --
      Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
    28. Re:What a waste by G+Morgan · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine monkey man after a few weeks with no coffee. They could tease him getting him to say developer in exchange for a cup.

    29. Re:What a waste by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
      Perhaps they should create a contest for "most creative way to destroy SCO" or something like that instead. It'd be much more fun. (Although seeing who actually enters this contest might be interesting.)
      No point... McBride has already won that prize.
      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    30. Re:What a waste by HiThere · · Score: 1

      If I could, I'd mod you up. I believe nearly everything you said. I didn't say it because I don't actually have the personal experience to justify it. (I'm rather the opposite of an entrepreneur in temperment. I like to lock myself into a close and code. And it still seems true.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    31. Re:What a waste by Jaxoreth · · Score: 1
      I'm certain SCO could score an entire division of developers within weeks if they simply offer cash money.
      Sure, but where would SCO get that money? You might as well cut out the middleman and work for Microsoft directly.

      --
      In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
    32. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent up. His questions are valid.

    33. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCAMP...what a name, lol.

  4. monkeyboy by namekuseijin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "developer, developers, developers..."

    use the Ballmer mantra, Darl. you have to sweat like a pig to convince your audience...

    --
    I don't feel like it...
    1. Re:monkeyboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hopefully at some point in the future we can see him squeal like a pig...it probably won't convince anybody, but it will probably be more satisfying than watching him sweat like a pig.

    2. Re:monkeyboy by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Ballmer is talked about so often here without telling the uninformed who he is, where you can coincidentally delve further into the mysterious BallmerSweat if you are so inclined. ;-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:monkeyboy by sageres · · Score: 1

      How dare you?!!!!
      How could you say this!!!!
      Offending pigs like that!
      Pigs are cute! http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/pigs/

    4. Re:monkeyboy by SiggyTheViking · · Score: 1

      You know, pigs don't actually sweat.
      That is why they are so fond of wallowing in the mud.

    5. Re:monkeyboy by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      "pigs don't actually sweat"

      are you sure? where do you think that tasty salty pork flavor comes from? ;)

      --
      I don't feel like it...
  5. Ring Tones? by neonprimetime · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "SCO has gone through some rocky times. It's been a real roller coast ride the last few years," McBride said. But SCO is now focused on making mobile business transactions easier to implement. Ring tones for cell phones has become a $1 billion market, McBride noted.

    So they go from something meaningful to Ring Tones? That's one crazy roller coaster.

    1. Re:Ring Tones? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think this really shows McBride's level of understanding of the business he runs.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Ring Tones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not ring tones, a mechanism for selling things the way ring tones are sold.

      It's actually an interesting topic, but I don't think a story full of screeching Groklaw fanboy zombies is the most productive place to discuss it.

    3. Re:Ring Tones? by mackermacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not surprising at all... SCO is now like VRML, a technology that was always looking for a purpose, rather than technology trying to solve a purpose. It almost reminds you of this company in the year 2k in SF, Istorage I want to say? The original business model was to provide 25MB of FREE storage space that you could access anytime! BY 2002, they had become a design studio or something.

      Companies have to keep rolling, so the executives can keep the money and options going.

    4. Re:Ring Tones? by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

      Lookout midi, we are coming to sue!

    5. Re:Ring Tones? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      cBride said. But SCO is now focused on making mobile business transactions easier to implement. Ring tones for cell phones has become a $1 billion market, McBride noted.

      So they go from something meaningful to Ring Tones? That's one crazy roller coaster.

      No no, not actual ring-tones per se, but the mobile business transactions which allow you to sell ring tones.

      Whereas before, we had the business model of:

      1) ring tones
      2) ??
      3) profit

      Darl is finally bringing in the elusive step 2 like this:

      1) ring tones
      2) re-work failing UNIX company who everyone hates to be middle layer for mobile transactions for things like ring tones (and hope people forgive us for being bastards)
      3) profit


      He just seems to be forgetting the extent to which people hate SCO at this point. I think they just have a toolkit, which seems to run on Lin^H^H^HUNIX, which they hope to have others develop applications for so companies will believe it's a worthwhile platform, and they can get on with generating revenue or claiming patent infringement to others for.

      Basically, he's trying to shift their business model back to, well, business. He's just hoping everyone else will give him a hand at it.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Ring Tones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      It's actually an interesting topic, but I don't think a story full of screeching Groklaw fanboy zombies is the most productive place to discuss it.


      So where do you ranting SCO shill zombies hang out?
    7. Re:Ring Tones? by larytet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      talking about ring tone to the cell phone - run goMyPlace daemon on your Mac/Linux/Win32 and access your 320 kbits MP3s at flat rate of Internet access. Open Source (GPL) including server side code

    8. Re:Ring Tones? by larytet · · Score: 1
      it is going to be tougher to sell ring tones in the future. people start to look for low quality MP3s and this kind of files you can download from any place including your own PC/Linux/Win32 - check this link picasso11.jpg

      if you clicked that file you downloaded cached data from one of the public folders on one of the HTTP servers connected to the public reverse proxy. check the speed - file is 700K size

    9. Re:Ring Tones? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      They haven't forgotten. They're planning on changing their name again, too. I forget what the new one they announced is, but they'll probably change it again before they enter the marketing phase...presuming they live that long.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:Ring Tones? by jtwronski · · Score: 1
      it is going to be tougher to sell ring tones in the future. people start to look for low quality MP3s and this kind of files you can download from any place including your own PC/Linux/Win32...


      I agree, but not for the reason you mention. With mp3 ringtones, easy access to audio editing software, and bluetooth file transfer, you can make your own in a very short amount of time. It took me about 5 minutes to import an old Cream song, cut out everything but the guitar riff at the beginning, and export to a 32k mp3.


      I'm pretty technically savvy, but my 11-year-old, not so much. It took him about 15 minutes to make his own.

    11. Re:Ring Tones? by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1
      It's been a real roller coast ride the last few years
      Did anyone see Final Destination 3?

      Maybe that applies to companies also.

    12. Re:Ring Tones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darl McBride is a blithering idiot. What's disturbing is how many corporate types still obsess about indemnification, to the point of dictating the specific distro for large Linux deploys, overriding the preference of their own Linux admins (i.e. mandating Red Hat or Suse instead of say, Debian). Sucks to have to use an inferior package manager just because Darl McBride is an inferior human being (using that term loosely).

    13. Re:Ring Tones? by larytet · · Score: 1
      i bet that upstream of the cell phones will be capped by the service providers and in some cases you will not be able to use bluetooth to exchange ring tones. this is not that hard to limit/block some of the features in the cell phone.

      generate ring tones from any MP3 is indeed rather thing to do - there are online services already which do exactly this. the problem is how you access your files. i think that the easy way is to download the file from home PC.

  6. Reminds me of... by TheDarkener · · Score: 4, Funny

    CLICK HERE and win a FREE IPOD!!!!!!!!111

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Reminds me of... by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

      I keep clicking but nothing happens, this is deceptive!

    2. Re:Reminds me of... by MadJo · · Score: 1

      Shenanigans!
      I clicked and nothing happened!

  7. Check the BMW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've probably sewn CD-ROMS full of source code in to the headliner of the car. If they're going to trial in 2007 they're going to need to produce some evidence pretty sharpish.

  8. 12 Cylinders? RTFA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA. The article says 10 cylinders -- not 12. That's probably the svelte M5.

  9. For $100,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can almost buy the company with that nowadays can't you?

    1. Re:For $100,000 by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not even close. You would have to buy out MS's and Sun's share. And I do not think that you can afford that.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:For $100,000 by Salsaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well done for spotting the catch. They pay you in SCO shares !

  10. UNIX Developers to SCO by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bite me!

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO by laughing+rabbit · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it be "Byte me!"?

      --
      No incumbents, not no where, not no how.
      Vote them out every term.
    2. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Well, I can program 'Hello World' in qbasic, but since no other developer is going to enter, I win by default :p On an unrelated note, anyone in the market for a new 10 cyl. car?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    3. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO by Cicero382 · · Score: 1

      A template letter (change numbers/epithets as necessary):

      Dear Mr SCO,

      I heard that you are looking for UNIX developers. I have 25 years of experience in this field and I am currently looking for a job. I enclose mv CV.

      This is just to let you know that I will NEVER work for your nasty, dishonest, corrupt, stupid ... etc etc excuse for a company. And noone else like me will, either because having your company name on a CV would be professional suicide.

      Mwahahahahaha!

          Yours Sincerely,

              A Highly Experienced UNIX Guru.

      PS. Fuck you!

  11. Unix developers to SCO:Suck it by turbosk · · Score: 4, Funny

    A pox on any and all who would sign on to duh-arl's 2-bit shakedown fart of a company.

    1. Re:Unix developers to SCO:Suck it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! They have the patent on those two bits, I'll have you know. You need to fork over your licensing fee before you can legally call them a 2-bit company.

    2. Re:Unix developers to SCO:Suck it by Flashpot · · Score: 1

      That really should be your sig. Priceless!

      --
      That which does not kill her only prolongs my agony.
  12. Those... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. UNIX Developers to SCO: by tokki · · Score: 5, Funny

    Go fuck yourself.

    1. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by jbeaupre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh, it's kind of creepy thinking how this might be "informative"

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    2. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think it adequately informs Daryl of the industry's opinion of him and his company.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Agreed IFF he read the post and modded it informative. For everyone else, it should be insightful. But informative implies that some reader read it and decided "hey, I'm informed!", modding it that way.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    4. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by ThousandStars · · Score: 4, Funny
      I guess I've been beaten to the headline inversion jokes:

      UNIX Developers to SCO: We want you dead.

      UNIX Developers to SCO: Lick our nuts.

      UNIX Developers who are channeling Steve Ballmer to SCO: Go fuck yourself. (Throw chair)

    5. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, informative would have been:

      Gone fucked themselves.

    6. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be GNU/Linux developers to SCO? What's SCO done to UNIX users?

    7. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would say it's "insightful" because that's exactly what SCO did to themselves.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    8. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UNIX Developers to SCO: Lick our nuts.

      Knowing SCO, they'd bite. Ouch.

    9. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Comments are moderated from viewpoint of potential Slashdot viewer.
      Informative is informative to potential slashdot viewer.
      no all here are unix developers or heard of unix more then few brief sentences.

    10. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the original post? how is "go f*** yourself" informative, unix developer or not?

    11. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Isn't conveying the attitudes of UNIX developers on the issue informative?
      Its not insightful,just a remark.now its moderated funny,which is more appropriate.

    12. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am the guy who originally modded the GP up, posting anonymously in order to not undo the mod.
       
      I modded the post recursively... I am a UNIX developer, and I assumed that the GP was as well. And given the general consensus in this thread, I thought it was a pretty fair thing to say. It was informative in the sense that UNIX developers really were saying "fuck off and die", or "go fuck yourself" to SCO. Hence, it's informative.

    13. Re:UNIX Developers to SCO: by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Go fuck yourself in the ear with a beer you rat bastards. That's how I would finished that one had I been able to post it before you. :-)

  14. Obligatory article nitpicks... by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 5, Informative
    Linux is an open-source version of Unix designed for Intel chips.

    No, it's a clone of Unix, and it is no longer designed only for Intel chips. It was originally designed just for the 386, but now runs on anything, including your toaster.

    SCO is now concentrating on allowing businesses to create "biztones for quick distribution of business information, tied to business applications."

    What the hell is a "biztone"?! Is it some sort of ringtone for your cell phone where instead of ringing it goes, "Yeah, um, about those TPS reports..."?

    1. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      You got further than I did... I took one look at this and closed the tab:
      Trying to become known as something other than the company that sued prominent users of Linux, SCO is offering cash and cars to developers who use its tool kit to produce the wireless applications. The SCO Group is trying to become something other than the company that sued prominent users of Linux.
    2. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by EvanED · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that if they want to be known as something other than the one who sued prominent Linux users they should DROP THEIR CLAIMS AGAINST LINUX! If you want to be known as something other than the company that sued prominent users of Linux, it might be helpful to not sue them. That way they can be known as something other than the company that sued prominent users of Linux.

    3. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by Kelson · · Score: 2, Funny

      instead of ringing it goes, "Yeah, um, about those TPS reports..."?

      You did get the memo, right?

    4. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I doubt that they can drop their claims. The fact that they were(or are) funded by MS and Sun is an indication that they have to continue the harassment. At this time, if they drop it, there is no chance that the industry will forget it. Bad news/actions tends to follow you around. In addition, I suspect that MS/Sun have something over them for punishment if they fail to meet certain time goals.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by vmisev · · Score: 1
      Linux is an open-source version of Unix designed for Intel chips.
      No, it's a clone of Unix, and it is no longer designed only for Intel chips. It was originally designed just for the 386, but now runs on anything, including your toaster.
      nope, in the moment only netbsd runs on toaster: here and here
      linux is runing in the toaster oven:
    6. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What the hell is a "biztone"?!

      As in "BZZZZZZZZT!! WRONG Daryl - not gonna happen!"

    7. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by noamsml · · Score: 1

      Obligatory nitpick: Linux doesn't run on your toaster, NetBSD does.

    8. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      Lawsuits, like paraffin, never worked for them.

    9. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Maybe your toaster. I'm holding out for OSX on my toaster.

    10. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      If one were to install OS X on a toaster, it would be the size of a toaster oven but only make regular toast, it would be brushed metal (of course), it would have shiny blue LEDs and stuff, it would have only one large button labelled "toast" (no darkness settings--let's not confuse the user) and it would take twice as much power to make toast as any other toaster. But it would have a cool pulsating light pattern appear while making the toast, and if you left it plugged in 24/7, it would automatically clean the crumb tray.

    11. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      You forget the temperature readout, but other than that it's pretty dead on.

    12. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is a "biztone"?!

      Sounds sorta like Nortel's mid-90s buzzword..."webtone". And we all know who well wetbone...err...webtone worked out for Nortel.

    13. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by gmack · · Score: 1

      MS/Sun? No. It's IBM they need to worry about.

      The minute they drop their claims they are defenseless against IBM's counter claims. The best they can do right now is drag it out as long as possible in order to make as much money for themselves before the company gets sued into bankrupcy.

    14. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by confused+one · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They can't drop their claims against Linux now. It's gone too far. To drop the claim would be to say they sued everyone for no cause and wasted the court's time (the courts would not look kindly upon that). It would be handing the various companies a guaranteed win on all the counter suits, which aren't likely to go away just because SCO says, "Oops, our mistake. We did not mean to inconvenience you. Please pretend this never happened." They're in for the long haul, and are undoubtedly going to be trounced, torn apart and their management held legally responsible for making fraudulent claims.

    15. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's still the right thing to do.

      I'm sure if McBride quit right now, he could find some job that someone would take him for, somewhere. It might be McDonalds, but it would be a living.

      As it is, well, you said it, they will undoubtably be torn apart. All this tells me is that like Enron, the execs who made all the fuckups will get off with a warning and a pile of cash, and the hard-working people who never liked the company in the first place will get the shaft.

      Which means, he may ultimately win, but I doubt if he can sleep at night.

      Which reminds me -- one of the benefits of a small business is that you know everyone, from the smallest file clerk to the owner of the company. It means you have a much more personal motivation to make the company succeed, or to go down with the ship. It's a lot easier to jump ship with a large severance package if you only really know other people who can do the same... and the US government supports Big Business.

      It's too late for conspiracy theories, though, I'll need my sanity tomorrow. Draw your own conclusions, Slashdot.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    16. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      it's be ironic if he ended up working the counter at mcdonalds, because mcdonalds cash registers run SCO Unix.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    17. Re:Obligatory article nitpicks... by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      White LEDs, surely?

      Anyway, I thought the Macbook Pro was a toaster. Just turn it on and put it on top of the bread for a few minutes.

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  15. I think somebody should go for it by TLouden · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and then give most of the money to the FOSS community. In fact, why not use that community to fund itself using this bounty?

    --
    -Tim Louden
    1. Re:I think somebody should go for it by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      They want to pay you to write something for them, not the world. An SCO employee releasing their source/SCO's "intellectual property" may well get you fired and sued.

  16. They're prepping for the shareholder lawsuit by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is inevitable that there will be a shareholder lawsuit as SCO makes its final circles around the drain before bankruptcy or liquidation. Darth Darl needs to make it look like he made his best effort at keeping the company afloat to have a chance of keeping all of his money.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:They're prepping for the shareholder lawsuit by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      It is inevitable that there will be a shareholder lawsuit as SCO makes its final circles around the drain before bankruptcy or liquidation.
      Actually, I rather doubt that. I suspect that the present management and largest shareholder are working to ensure SCO has no cash or assets that other shareholders could go after. Where will the cash go? Well, already a pretty fair sized chunk has gone into Darl's bank account, but I would also look out for a spin-off of "Me Inc".
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  17. If I'm the only developer by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Funny
    do I get all the prizes?

    Quick, everyone send them the programer you hate working with most .... this should improve morale appropriately for most companies out there

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  18. Lost trust by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I don't think they will be able to find enough developers that will trust them. They're already trying to steal the work of countless others, the sentiment goes, why would we try to do business with them again?

    This is why their former customers are not going to be future customers, unless they're badly locked in on some 3rd party software. And non-customers will never become customers. Who wants to do business with somebody who'll sue you for moving to a competitor's product? It's like getting divorced from a gold-digger.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
    1. Re:Lost trust by keesh · · Score: 1

      How many developers do you think are really aware of the issues? There're plenty that aren't.

    2. Re:Lost trust by gihan_ripper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure there are plenty of less-than-ethical developers who wouldn't scoff at the potential of a BMW (note the article says 10-cyclinder whereas the summary says 12-cylinder) or the $100,000. Developers don't own their work, so the question of stealing work becomes irrelevant. The relevant question is whether an SCO manager will just give the cash prize to his nephew.

      To reiterate: developers aren't clients so the trust question doesn't arise, or at least takes a different form.

      --
      Phoenix, Boston, Little Rock, see a pattern?
    3. Re:Lost trust by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Its not about trust, its about respect.

      Friend: "Hey Joe, where you workin nowadays?"
      Joe: "I work at *cough*sco*splutter*"

      Speaking for myself (and based on the replies so far posted) I will not trust nor respect SCO ever again.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Lost trust by Infernal+Device · · Score: 1

      First is the question of judging standards for "popularity". More than likely, delivery of the payment is tied to the product reaching a certain level of popularity within a certain timeframe - if it doesn't meet this metric, then the developer doesn't get paid. And guess who sets the standard?

      Next is the question of funds availability. Their legal wranglings have cost them dearly (not dearly enough, in my opinion) and there is no end in sight. Everyone needs to ask themselves if they're willing to gamble that SCO will pay up and not just take the code and declare bankruptcy.

      The question of ethics is one everyone has to decide for themselves. While it might be a no-brainer here, elsewhere the line begins to blur and I'm pretty sure there are a lot of people who just don't give a damn either way because it just doesn't touch them.

      --
      "My God...it's full of trolls!"
    5. Re:Lost trust by schon · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are plenty of less-than-ethical developers who wouldn't scoff at the potential of a BMW (note the article says 10-cyclinder whereas the summary says 12-cylinder) or the $100,000.

      Yes, and anyone who actually believes that they'll have a chance to "win" it deserves everything they'll get.

      The car/money is gonna go to Darl's nephew, and the anyone stupid enough to do real work are gonna get screwed.

    6. Re:Lost trust by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      note the article says 10-cyclinder whereas the summary says 12-cylinder Well, it's from a .au domain, so obviously they have to convert from cylinders Australian to cylinders U.S. The exchange rate has gone straight to hell in the last few years.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    7. Re:Lost trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree about the "lost trust" issue - well phrased!


      It really invites a reverse-spin from anyone who SCO might interview.


      A real typical question is ... where do you want to be in 5 years with this company, and what will you be doing.


      A great question for someone being interviewed to ask SCO would be where will the company be in 5 years, and what will it be doing?

  19. BMW? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0, Troll
    Bleah. Do I get a security blankie with that?

    Make it a 2007 Shelby Cobra GT500 and you might spark my interest. Oh, wait, I already make way more than enough to buy one myself. Never mind, Duhrl.

  20. How about by jzuska · · Score: 1

    How about no. You piss off the whole community and then beg us for help. Bah, i'll do it, just make me CEO.

    (so I can fold the company)

  21. Look in house first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he should check to see if his lawyers are any good at writing code.

  22. mod parent up by namekuseijin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yes, please

    --
    I don't feel like it...
    1. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please... my karma is already Excellent, don't waste yours telling people to mod me up!

      --ThinkingInBinary

    2. Re:mod parent up by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      i don't mind karma points, but i didn't have moderation points and thought your comment was right on the money.

      --
      I don't feel like it...
  23. 20% extra for the lawyers. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Funny

    You need more cylinders to pull the extra dead weight

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:20% extra for the lawyers. by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      In any case, it shows: SCO hits the wrong spot once again.

      Who in his sane mind would want a gas-sucking car during a period where gas prices are going up and don't seem to have reached their peak just yet. Why, instead of appointing one $100.000 car to one developer, don't they just offer to lease a Prius or other hybrid to every developer?

      I guess they don't even want to hire sane developers, just the ones who get tricked into something easily. And then everything starts to make sense again...

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  24. Prisoners dilemma by jbeaupre · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sounds like a versio of the prisoners dilemma http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma /

    Except in theis case it's developers avoiding working for SCO. But the less who do, the better the chances for someone else to get the prize. So there's an incentive to break ranks. Maybe be the one and only developer.

    Think of it as a lottery with your integrity against winning a fast car.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Prisoners dilemma by dbc001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      taking a grand from SCO doesn't have to cost you your integrity. there's no commit to do any development is there? just go through the training. sleep through it even! or is there some fine print that i missed?

    2. Re:Prisoners dilemma by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to agree. Take the money and run. But there's probably going to be fine print.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    3. Re:Prisoners dilemma by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      taking a grand from SCO doesn't have to cost you your integrity. there's no commit to do any development is there? just go through the training. sleep through it even! or is there some fine print that i missed?

      You have a contractual relationship with a company that is on record for stating that contracts are to be used as weapons against their customers/partners/employees.

      Sign a contract with a venemously litigious company like SCO and unless you have a lot of capital to spend on lawyers (one hell of a lot more than the $1000 they're offering), SCO owns your ass (and any code you write might well be considered "tainted").

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    4. Re:Prisoners dilemma by kfg · · Score: 1

      Think of it as a lottery with your integrity against winning a fast car. . .

      . . .with egg all over it . . . and maybe "SCO Ho" spraypainted on the side.

      Not advocating, just sayin' is all.

      KFG

    5. Re:Prisoners dilemma by NickFortune · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Think of it as a lottery with your integrity against winning a fast car.

      I think even as sole contestant, the odds are against anyone winning these prizes. For a start, I don't think the money is going to be there by the time it comes to payout. Although I don't expect Darl would have any qualms about standing up and saying "Sadly none of the entries reached the professional standard we were looking for, so we've decided to withold the prize until we get an entrant the meets the minimum requirements." Where the requirements are the sole decision of the judges, of course, and where Darl is the judge. I mean he hasn't shown any great reluctance thus far when it comes to blatant dishonesty or borderline fraud.

      But I expect they'll keep the rights to the code in any event, unless it gets awarded to IBM in lieu of compensation. Hmmm... what do you want to be the IPR from this boondoggle is going to be owned by a separate company to SCO, hmm?

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    6. Re:Prisoners dilemma by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      My integrity? For a fast car? Now that's a deal I can work with. I thought they wanted me to produce something useful, too.
      [/joke]

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    7. Re:Prisoners dilemma by csoto · · Score: 1

      So maybe my "Hello World" Java method will win this one!

      --
      There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    8. Re:Prisoners dilemma by LihTox · · Score: 2, Funny


      taking a grand from SCO doesn't have to cost you your integrity. there's no commit to do any development is there? just go through the training. sleep through it even!

      Sign a contract with a venemously litigious company like SCO and...SCO owns your ass (and any code you write might well be considered "tainted").

      Maybe my mom should sign up: she's not likely to write any code SCO would want (or any code at all, for that matter), and she can sleep through most things.
  25. MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmmm... on a completely cough random topic, I think I might switch from MySQL to Postgres.

    HP, I could care less about (their computers are cheap, and their calculators are nothing like they used to be), but I thought that MySQL had a decent set of morals. The fact that they could maintain enterprise support while still offering an open-source version is an indication of that. (Although I believe some of the MySQL products are available only to enterprise customers, which is evil.)

  26. Tag suggestions by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 1

    While it's kind of cheap to suggest tags for stories I would like to suggest a few: fuckoff and no. The SCO people may never see them, but it just feels so good.

    --

    What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
  27. Not worth it. by moultano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    100,000 dollars would certainly be nice, but I think the potential loss of my immortal soul is the dealbreaker for me.

    1. Re:Not worth it. by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 2, Informative

      what profits a man if he should gain the whole world and lose his immortal soul ;)

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    2. Re:Not worth it. by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 2

      More accurately:
      "For what profit has a man, if he gets all the world with the loss of his life? or what will a man give in exchange for his life?"
      The book of Mathew chapter 16 verse 26 ;)

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    3. Re:Not worth it. by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you could pick up chicks with a car like that.

      Oh, wait this is Slashdot...
       

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    4. Re:Not worth it. by brilliant-mistake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'd never see the 100k anyhow. They're a bunch of con artists. They'd take your work and turn around and sue you probably.

    5. Re:Not worth it. by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

      It's sad if working with a company like SCO is considered "losing your soul." The mangling of the passage is not necessary...

      --
      This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  28. Darel sure grokked the alpha programmer psyche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "12 cylinder BMW" as an incentive. He wants his appli written by salesMEN?

  29. Incentives for programmers... by GonzoTech · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will pay $200,000 or give the car of your choice, so long as it doesn't exceed $200,000, for someone to give the CEO of SCO a good stiff kick to the nuts.

    --
    "Snatching defeat from the mouth of victory on a daily basis."
  30. It's a trick! by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure sure, use their products to build your applications, and then they will give you your new shiny BMW and 100,000 bucks. And then they'll sue you for all your money and the BMW. This is just a trick, they want customers with money, so they can sue them. How do they actually get customers with money? Give them the money!

    I think they need a reality check: perpetual motion is not possible in this universe.

    Maybe this is just money laundering, they give you the money, write it off as expense. Then pay their lawyers by letting them to sue the people with the money and the BMWs.
    They must be avoiding taxes with this somehow!

    1. Re:It's a trick! by GoNINzo · · Score: 1

      Yes, we know it's a trick. Get an axe.

      --
      Gonzo Granzeau
      "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
  31. Isn't all software wireless? by atomclock · · Score: 0

    "there's a 12 cylinder BMW or $100,000 dollars for the development of the best wireless application." Aren't wires a hardware issue?

  32. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by PFI_Optix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm confused by this post. I just have to ask you to clarify...

    Are you saying that MySQL is immoral/evil because they *gasp* charge for some things they invest time and money to develop, or is my sarcasm meter broken?

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  33. Re:12 Cylinders? RTFA. by Monokeros · · Score: 1

    Could be the M6
    And the M6 is closer to the alternative $100,000 prize option. (Article says 10-cyl. BMW or $100,000)

    --
    The Statue of Liberty is America's lawn jockey.
  34. Isn't that a little bit desperate?! by FoaadH · · Score: 0

    I mean all you need to attract developers to use a framework is to convince them that using it is more fun and productive than using other frameworks.

  35. SCO and a comeback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to bet on SCO making a comeback here... why? Darl McBride, for all his other faults, could sell popsicles to eskimos. He SPEAKS THE LANGUAGE OF BUSINESS. Most of you "coder" types won't understand this, but Darl is a damn good businessman.

    Darl knows how to incent people (another beemer in my collection or 100K? You bet!).

    1. Re:SCO and a comeback by tokki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If he's such a good sales person, where are the sales? If he's "speaks the language of business", then were are the revenues? If he's so good an incentives, where are the developers? Where are the quality people?

      The toughest job in tech right now must be a SCO sales person. The swear words they must have learned from cold calling...

  36. Well... by Cleon · · Score: 5, Funny

    You gotta give 'em credit. It looks like SCO is finally trying to produce something more substantial than subpoenas.

    --
    Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
  37. It would be wise to take advantage of this . . . by mmell · · Score: 1, Interesting
    . . . opportunity. After all, consider: once SCO finally goes bankrupt (and I have little doubt that eventually, they will) their "intellectual property" (what they retain of it) will become the property of their creditors, who will almost certainly not make it commercially available. That (IIRC) will make SCO's OS de facto public domain. Those elements of SCO's OS which are not their IP will likewise almost certainly end up as either public domain or GPL'ed.

    Since there are businesses out there still using SCO's products, there will be a market for professionals specifically trained and qualified to administer those products (even if only long enough to migrate to something else).

  38. Maybe Darl has something... by Target+Practice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those darn CRN folks, always leaving parts of the quotes out. Here's a reprint, I put Darl's original comments missing from the report in '[]'.

    "During the last 25 years, SCO has been committed to [destroying the reputability of] the Unix platform and continues to reaffirm its commitment [to make fools of ourselves while the rest of the world actually accomplishes something useful]," Darl McBride, SCO president, said in a teleconference Tuesday morning.

    I applaud him for finally admitting what his company has been doing. Of course, he can shove his BMWs up his /dev/null.

    --
    There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
  39. Sorry SCO by Mancat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not 1994 anymore. Nobody uses UnixWare or OpenServer. Those that do, probably want out as fast as possible. Your products are obsolete: Your hardware support sucks. Standards implementation sucks. Didn't you just get USB support in UnixWare a couple of years ago? Nobody is even worrying about whether or not their software will compile on your operating systems these days. You've alienated the entire Unix market systematically.

    You're DEAD. Get over it. File chapter 11 and liquidate those assets already.

    --
    hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    1. Re:Sorry SCO by Brunellus · · Score: 4, Informative

      File chapter 11 and liquidate those assets already.

      I always thought that chapter 11 was "reorganization" and chapter 7 was "liquidation"

    2. Re:Sorry SCO by irenaeous · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are absolutely right. I worked on SCO systems as a contractor for TACO BELL for a few years programming and maintaining their back of house software used on PC's in the store. They had an effort to create a windows based in-store system, but that has been abandoned. Now, they are porting their back of house applications to SUSE Linux with a view to getting off of SCO systems as soon as they can. The same is true, I believe for their fellow Yum brands company, Pizza Hut.

      This latest move by SCO is desperation -- trying to find some new market in which to stay alive while their bread and butter UnixWare and OpenServer business withers and dies. SCO is going down.

    3. Re:Sorry SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not sure which it is, just call it chapter 7/11.

    4. Re:Sorry SCO by Rey+Willie · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are mostly correct. Chapter 7 bankruptcy is generally a controlled liquidation of the entire company (Ch. 7 also applies to certain personal bankruptcy cases). Chapter 11 is the "reorganization" chapter, where in theory, firms divest themselves of underperforming businesses, restructure their debt and return lean and mean. However, there are Chapter 11 cases where all of the assets of the business are sold in bulk, which looks a lot like a liquidation.

      Of course, this theory doesn't really reflect much of what goes on in the Bankruptcy Courts, but that is another discussion.

    5. Re:Sorry SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      McDonald's USA is also working to get their back office system off SCO and ported to Windows.

      The marketing-bragging on SCO's web site about McDonald's is laughably out of date; it quotes people who haven't been involved in the US IT group for years.

    6. Re:Sorry SCO by diogoko · · Score: 1

      Somehow this reminds me of the now infamous Be reorientation to the mobile market.

      --
      I set myself free of signatures. If I could, you can do it too!
    7. Re:Sorry SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I believe that Sherwin-Williams did this two years ago by switching from SCO in their stores to IBM Suse Linux for a total of 9000+ pc's and SCO was NOT happy about it. At leats that's what I remember reading, but it's been two years.

    8. Re:Sorry SCO by aarku · · Score: 1

      Chapter 1 is a good read, titled "Darl gets trippled by Slashdot"

    9. Re:Sorry SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you have states that have "Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors", the most ironic title imaginable. It's kind of a non-legal bankruptcy where there seems to be zero accountability to anyone. I get the impression California used it to plow through all the .COM bombs without tying up the courts. But some people got rich off of these bankrtupcies, while others got seriously screwed.

    10. Re:Sorry SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they were using NT for their web servers and were very unhappy. So they ditched NT for Unix, which they are still using today.

  40. 12 cylinder eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WEIRD how the 2 extra cylinders got there...

    tfa says 10...

  41. Wow by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I can't beleive McBride is still the CEO of SCO.
    The remaining SCO stockholders must be dumbasses.

  42. How devilish of him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People like this guy never stop trying to get over on other people. He deserves all the egg on his face he gets. You'd be no less than a fool to buy into this crap.

  43. I have a few SCO customers.... by SwedishChef · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and they can't wait for their apps to make the move to Linux. One customer - and this is an end user - is talking openly about the "end of SCO". Another moved to an application running on an IBM i5 (the modern version of the AS400). If there is any cost involved to an upgrade or a fix, SCO customers often just move on to another platform. There is now an entire mini-industry involved in converting data on SCO servers to some other server.

    Besides, even the latest versions of SCO/unix seriously suck. We swapped out a tape drive in one and it took days to get it running and required lots of phone time. Until I started on this project I had forgotten how difficult Linux was in 1993; that's where SCO is now.

    Plus no bash shell. No up-arrow command scrolling. Arggh!

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:I have a few SCO customers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No up-arrow command scrolling. Arggh!


      # ksh; set -o vi;


      ESC -/+ to scroll cmd history.

      Oh ya, SCO go fuck yourself!

  44. Roller coast ride? by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "SCO has gone through some rocky times. It's been a real roller coast ride the last few years"


    "Roller coast ride" implies movement both up and down. So I don't think that the term applies to SCO. "Falling like a rock" is the term I had in mind.
    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    1. Re:Roller coast ride? by wordsofwisedumb · · Score: 1
      Maybe Drop Zone is a more accurate ride.

      Or maybe skydiving without a parachute.

  45. This is Darl's "Cover my ass" strategy by denis-The-menace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now that the stock price is in free fall, He needs to have something to show that he and his cronies were not out to use SCO stock "Boiler Room" style (http://imdb.com/title/tt0181984/) when the stockholders sue. This way, he'll be able to say: "We tried to make a go at it and nobody wanted to develop for our platform...".

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:This is Darl's "Cover my ass" strategy by Secrity · · Score: 3, Informative

      It what way do you mean "free fall" when speaking of SCO's stock price?

      SCO's stock is currently at $4.30, which is about where it has been since the the climax that occurred in 2004. Today's stock price is almost smack dab in the middle between the 52 week high and the 52 week low and today's trading volume so far has been 250 shares. Current price is the same as it was when it opened today. I would call this the doldrums rather than a "free fall". Large amounts of SCO's stock is held by a very few number of people and few outsiders want to buy any, which means that the stock trading volume is generally very low and the price is steady. I wonder if there is anything, short of losing two appeals after losing to IBM, that will significantly impact SCO's stock price.

    2. Re:This is Darl's "Cover my ass" strategy by Clovert+Agent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      SCO criticism is mostly all valid, but this is just wrong. SCOX has been holding steady at ~4.20 for months and months - it's all insiders peddling tiny volume. It was in freefall, oh, a couple of years ago, but it's stable now and it ain't going anywhere.
      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=SCOX&t=5y&l=off&z= m&q=l&c=

  46. Darl's sadness by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... Darl McBride is looking to get Unix developers back onboard with cash incentives...

    Wow. When you have to pay a community reknowned for volunteerism and hacker fascination, that's just profoundly sad.

    1. Re:Darl's sadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may have contributed to a few open source applications, but I still enjoy getting paid occasionally. My "volunteerism and hacker fascination" doesn't stop the bills from coming in.

    2. Re:Darl's sadness by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's pathetic they have to PAY people to work for them! Popular companies like Google and Microsoft have all their employees work for free.

  47. SCO changing its image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article:
    The SCO Group is trying to become something other than the company that sued prominent users of Linux.
    At this point I doubt that will ever happen.
  48. bmw, huh? by vortigern00 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The winner of the bmw may notice that no matter how many times he washes it... it just won't come clean.

    1. Re:bmw, huh? by kpainter · · Score: 2, Funny

      This reminds me of an old BMW joke:

      What is the difference between a BMW and a porcupine?

      On the BMW, the pricks are on the inside.

  49. No sterility fears here! by LizardKing · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have my laptop pretty far forward, almost wobbling on my knees. The result is no overheated knackersack, instead I get back ache from leaning over the laptop ...

    1. Re:No sterility fears here! by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Hmm, too many beers during the Portugal v Mexico football match. My laptop comment was supposed to be attached to the spontaneously combusting Dell story!

  50. Disappointing... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    SCO is also offering a 10-cylinder BMW car or a US$100,000 cash prize for the developers who use the toolkit to produce the best wireless applications

    I was kinda hoping they'd offer SCO Linux Licenses as the top prize. On the other hand, with $100K, you can buy 143 of them, at $699.00 each!!!

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Disappointing... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I just had his picture in my mind: In the postnuclear wasteland, where everything but electricity is scarce, not gasoline, old dollars or bottlecaps will be the currency of the rich but SCO Linux licenses. If you can get your hand on one of those you'll be a made man.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  51. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by LukeCrawford · · Score: 0

    I think the previous poster is trying to say that MySQL should know better than to associate with the likes of SCO.

  52. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    HP, I could care less about (their computers are cheap, and their calculators are nothing like they used to be), but I thought that MySQL had a decent set of morals. The fact that they could maintain enterprise support while still offering an open-source version is an indication of that.

    I'm confused by this post. I just have to ask you to clarify...

    Are you saying that MySQL is immoral/evil because they *gasp* charge for some things they invest time and money to develop, or is my sarcasm meter broken?


    No, I think he means mysql is evil because they are sponsoring SCO's disgusting attempt to buy their way out of the history books and back into mainstream corporate and technology circles. I happen to agree...MySQL is more evil than companies like HP et.al. for the very reason he cited: they are in the free software community, they know the issues, and they certainly cannot be ignorant of how Darl McBride and SCO tried to steal GNU/Linux from its creators (yes, steal, because if McBride et.al. had succeeded in their fraud, the creators of the Linux kernel, and perhaps the wider GNU community, would have been denied the right to legally use their own creations), and they've chosen to sponsor this despite that knowledge. At least a big company like HP may not have followed this (all the SCO bruhaha could be beneath their radar).

    I agree that sponsoring an evil knowing its full implications is an act of greater maliciousness than sponsoring an evil in ignorance of its full implications, and MySQL certainly appears to fall in the former category.

    It's a pity...I actually like their product. Time to give postgres a gander I suppose.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  53. Ain't gonna do it by tommasz · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was almost intrigued enough to head over to SCO's site just to see what "biztones" are, but then I realized I don't have all afternoon to scrub my browser clean.

  54. Re:It would be wise to take advantage of this . . by Jeremi · · Score: 1
    once SCO finally goes bankrupt (and I have little doubt that eventually, they will) their "intellectual property" (what they retain of it) will become the property of their creditors, who will almost certainly not make it commercially available.


    Okay, sure, I"m with you so far....


    That (IIRC) will make SCO's OS de facto public domain.


    That would be nice, but it's extremely unlikely. Most likely the OS will just become abandonware. For an example, look at what happened to BeOS when Be, Inc. when under. The BeOS codebase is still very much non-open-source, and was bought by Palm, who hasn't made it available to anyone.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  55. Dear SCO by vinn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dear SCO:

    We don't like you. You don't play well with the other children on the playground. We think you're mean and we're not going to let you play dodgeball with us at recess.

    Besides that, your products are pretty awful. The only redeeming quality of Caldera Linux was that it was based on RedHat. That made it really easy to completely dump your distribution and go to RedHat when you guys got out of the Linux game. Your OpenServer product is the the most god awful piece of crap ever sold. It's so painful to work on that I'd rather just gouge out my eyes with a spoon.

    Please just go away.

    --
    ----- obSig
    1. Re:Dear SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. O'Doyle rules.

  56. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, my major point was that any company that sponsors SCO or their activities is evil.

    Second, what I was saying is that, given that MySQL's business model involves, for the most part, giving away software and selling support, and given that they've gotten a lot of help from open-source developers, I think it would be better and nicer if they gave away all of their software, and charged for support, just like they do with the MySQL database itself. I would wager that the higher-end enterprise stuff is pretty complex to configure, and most companies would be happy to pay for support instead of wandering around trying to figure it out themselves.

  57. What kind of apps would be appropriate? by aapold · · Score: 3, Funny
    • Some possibilities...
    • License revenue tracker
    • Legal Fund Donation App (allows people to make donations and track who donated what
    • Press goodwill scanner - monitors RSS feeds and gauges amount of positive and negative stories on a given subject
    • Job Search / Resume submitter combined app...

      • hmmm any others?
    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  58. Re:It would be wise to take advantage of this . . by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whoever bought the rights from the creditors would then retain the rights. In the current environment where you can patent "flat cylindrical device to affect forward and reverse movement" and sue anyone with a wheel, I don't think the purchaser would release to public domain. Of course, at that point, they obviously couldn't use it to wedge up Linux, so not sure what other use it would have. Probably would have a few lawyers just sit on it, looking for ways to sue others.

  59. Up the offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean if I am going to sell my soul

    I at least want more than this shit you offer. BMW?!?!?!?!

    My soul is at least worth three Type 41 Royale!!!!!

    Alas, negotiating with the Devil, is to yourself between a rock and a hard place. No matter what you get, the reputation (alone) of the Devil kills you anyway.

    Why not increase your offer by giving me the ultimate in security, a cellophane blow-up bulletproof vest or a servant robot developed by your former MS backers :)

    Of course, I am joking, NOT!

  60. What? by cpuenvy · · Score: 0

    McBride said the case against IBM "is scheduled to come to trial in early 2007. We continue to feel we have a strong case and we're looking forward to our day in court. But while the legal teams have been off litigating, the business team has been busy innovating.">

    They have a case. When did this happen?

    They are innovative? When did this happen?

    Why am I always the last one to hear about this stuff?

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  61. Correction in regards to offered prize by Acid-Duck · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article clearly states it's a 10-cylinder bimmer, not a V12

  62. Mysql + SCO???? WTF by brennz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.sco.com/products/mysql/

    This is disgusting.

    Mysql AB should be ashamed of themselves for this blatant support of an OSS attacker.

    Postgresql
    +better ANSI compliance
    +ACID
    +not a toy database
    +doesn't support SCO finances

    Make your move today!

    1. Re:Mysql + SCO???? WTF by evil_Tak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there anything that actually shows Mysql is supporting SCO? Or is SCO just using their product the same way it's using Apache and perl and PHP?

      Kind of ironic that they call themselves a 'SCAMP' stack...

    2. Re:Mysql + SCO???? WTF by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      You're kind of behind times. =)

      MySQL deal dates a while back. I'm not exactly sure what the deal between MySQL and SCO was, but I guess it didn't really amount to that much on MySQL's side. Basically, MySQL said something along the lines of "Fine, we won't fire at you if you use it."

      And also, MySQL 5 fixes a lot of problems you list... unless you use the backwards compatible mode and the ISAM tables, which means if you use someone else's apps, they've got to be updated to use strict mode and InnoDB... uh, yeah, better just use PostgreSQL anyway =)

    3. Re:Mysql + SCO???? WTF by brennz · · Score: 1

      "MySQL has become the most popular open-source database in the world by offering users a good combination of choice, performance and ease of use," said Marten Mickos, MySQL's CEO. ...

      "We will now be providing developers with the additional option of leveraging SCO's popular platforms. We look forward to working with SCO and their large reseller network to support our mutual customers with their enterprise database applications," Mickos said. ...

      The certified version of MySQL 5.0 for SCO OpenServer 6 will be available later this year under the name MySQL Network for SCO OpenServer 6. It will be available directly from SCO and from SCO's resellers. Its pricing has not yet been set.

      Taken from http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1895%2C1855483%2 C00.asp

      ******************

      Mysql AB actively sought a relationship with SCO, and is now assisting SCO by joint certifications.

      You can be sure every dollar they make will be used to fund their legal warchest for the attack on GNU/Linux

      We should boycott Mysql, and Mysql AB.

  63. Biztones... by no_pets · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My former CIO would definitely go for a "biztone". Basically he already had them except that they were text messages that would be paged to some of us in the department. Various (quasi-)informative messages such as "Day End processing completed", "payroll processing completed" and "interface XYZ has failed", "interface XYZ restarted automatically". Stupid shit like that. He'd probably assign them all a separate "biztone" or something.

    Of course we had fun with it. We made up our own messages such as "lunchtime", "time to go home". He was such a PHB. I'm sure other PHBes would like biztones as well.

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
  64. I will do it!!!1111! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Windows _EXPERT_!!!!

  65. Where's the upside? by CodeMasterPhilzar · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let me see...

    I suppose I could develop an app on either my Red Hat or Suse boxes, then port it over to SCO. But you know, I'll just bet I'd have to pay about $700 for that "privilege."

    Then I'd submit it... I'll bet buried in the "contest" rules somewhere is a clause about their getting rights to use or expand on any or all submissions. So my IP would essentially become theirs.

    The only even remotely "up" side of this is that I'll bet my app would stand a fair chance of winning just 'cause there'll be so few entries.

    On second thought, maybe I'll just go buy $695 worth of lottery tickets and a six pack...

    --
    --- Just another Code-Monkey
  66. Unix developers to SCO: No thanks by eldoo77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't believe that this is going to work...

  67. I have 2 words for SCOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK YOU!

  68. It's all about the pitch by Illserve · · Score: 2, Funny

    First prize... is a 12 cylinder BMW

    Second prize... is a hundred thousand dollars

    Third prize... we steal your code

    ABC

    A Always
    B Be
    C Coding!

  69. SCO's business ring tone by brant_kelly · · Score: 0
  70. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by operagost · · Score: 1
    HP, I [sic]could care less about (their computers are cheap
    You obviously haven't worked with any of their servers, especially the Alpha (R.I.P.) and Integrity lines. Maybe inexpensive, but not cheap.
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  71. Winning an SCO prize for programming brilliance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    is like winning the L. Ron Hubbard "Writers of the Future" prize.

    Does a young programmer really want to taint his entire career with the stink of Darl McBride hanging around his neck?

  72. What's Next? by dgulbran · · Score: 1

    SCO is now concentrating on allowing businesses to create "biztones for quick distribution of business information, tied to business applications.

    What is their core business again?! So the "lawsuit" business model didn't work, now they're jumping on the ringtone bandwagon? Sheesh, Daryl, cut to the chase and launch sco.xxx!

    --
    The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun, with Coca-cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun.
  73. Does the toolkit run on Linux as well? by kermada · · Score: 0

    How come no one asked if the toolkit will run on any other version of *nix?
    To cool, if the only part of SCO left was the toolkit on linux.

  74. Not a 12-cylinder BMW by W2k · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's actually a BMW M5, which has got a V10 engine. The article summary is wrong.

    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
  75. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by saider · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a pity...I actually like their product. Time to give postgres a gander I suppose.

    Voting with your wallet, eh?

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  76. HEY! HEY!! Don't slam Darl...ever since Brokeback. by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    cowboy love has been ok. Darl loves you baby. He's the rootinest tootinest. EVERYBODY SINGALONG!!!! Darl can't get along little dogey, he can't even get one that's small, He can't get a long little dogey, he can't get a dogey at all....

    (Apologies to Yosemite Sam)

  77. Porting NetworkManager to SCO by sagei · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would like to hereby announce that I am porting my baby, NetworkManager, to SCO in order to reap the $100,000 offer. We will easily make "best wireless application."

    --

    Robert Love

  78. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No, I think he means mysql is evil because they are sponsoring SCO's disgusting attempt to buy their way out

    iirc, it was SCO who paid mysql money for them to support SCO users, not the other way around.

  79. 3 E-Z steps to SCO ressurection - serious by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Step 1: drop silly lawsuits
    Step 2: apologize
    Step 3: Entire executive team and anyone else who supported the lawsuits resign and disgourge yourself from any lawsuit-related profits, such as profits from short-selling.

    Do that, and I'll consider helping them out. Until then, they are blackballed.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:3 E-Z steps to SCO ressurection - serious by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Step 4: Realize that you have no product, no top level management and no lawsuit to help keep the money rolling in from a certain Redmond-based software house.
      Step 5: Bankrupt.

    2. Re:3 E-Z steps to SCO ressurection - serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do that, and I'll consider helping them out. Until then, they are blackballed.

      Geez... I'm sure SCO is very concerned that you've put them on the "blackballed" list... I'm sure they're sweating bullets as we speak... [rolling of the eyes]

    3. Re:3 E-Z steps to SCO ressurection - serious by echodots · · Score: 0

      hey, you better quit it or you'll be blackballed! LMAO

      Me.

  80. Old joke by tbone1 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Naturally SCO would pick the BMW; it's the car of candy-@ss lawyer-thieves.


    What's the difference between a BMW and a porcupine?

    The porcupine has pricks on the outside.

    Thank you! I'm here all week! Tip your waitress! Help her back up!

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    1. Re:Old joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In school the teacher asked the children: "What does daddy do?"

      First was little Jenny: "My daddy is a doctor. He makes people well."

      Next came little Suzie: "My daddy is a bus driver. He helps people go places."

      Then it was the turn of little Tommy, who stood up proudly and said: "My daddy plays piano in a whore house."

      The teacher was more than a bit concerned about this response, and so she called Tommy's parents into school.

      Tommy's father explained: "Well, I couldn't bring myself to tell him that I work for SCO. . . ."

  81. tempting, but... no by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    With the level of animosity towards SCO, their lack of support anywhere these days, and absolutely pathetic product lineup, I can't imagine many developers being interested in this. So, I figure I'd have a pretty good shot at that Bimmer or the $100k... which would be sweet. But, frankly, I'd be plain fucking scared to have any sort of relationship with SCO, period. I, personally, wouldn't risk it.

    Then there's the problem of ethics, which would also end up preventing me from participating in this.

    Yeah... Just die already SCO.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  82. Anything good about UnixWare or Sco-Me? by HighOrbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can somebody who has actually used either UnixWare or OpenServer say if they have any redeeming qualities at all? From what I've read, they are actually the least capable of the modern unixes or unix-clones, even on x86(except perhaps for minix - which was just a teaching project anyway). Is there any reason why anybody would choose UnixWare or OpenServer for a new deployment?

    It sounds like they think they have is a niffty middle-ware stack for cellphones and they want to use that as a hook for selling their Unix stuff. But if their middle-ware stack is so niffty that it would attract developers, why not port it to other systems to widen the audience and build a new business on that? That was the strategy taken by 'old SCO' aka Tarantella before they unloaded unix on Caldera.

    Can anybody comment (intelligently) on their middleware?

    1. Re:Anything good about UnixWare or Sco-Me? by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Can somebody who has actually used either UnixWare or OpenServer say if they have any redeeming qualities at all?

      I'll do what I can to the best of my ability. One of my clients has an OpenServer box, but it is very old and even predates the buyout of SCO UNIX by Caldera. Therefor most of my knowledge is rather dated and may not apply to what is current.

      From what I've read, they are actually the least capable of the modern unixes or unix-clones, even on x86(except perhaps for minix - which was just a teaching project anyway). Is there any reason why anybody would choose UnixWare or OpenServer for a new deployment?

      OpenServer is a joke compared to modern UNIX and UNIX work-a-likes such as Linux or the BSDs. Clients I've known who have had OpenServer have invariably migrated away from it with one exception, and they will likely do so soon. Those people who are still using OpenServer are doing so not because they necessarily choose it, but because they chose some proprietary application for their business that was created to run on SCO OpenServer during it's hayday.

      For example, my client has been using OpenServer for probably close to ten years. They purchased it as part of a software package to handle certain needs. The company that produced this software is still in business, but no longer supports OpenServer. This has created a need for my client to migrate away from OpenServer, though perhaps not from the specific software. Naturally they will be involving us in their evaluation of a new software suite to handle their needs, and OpenServer will be immediately shot down. Even had The SCO Group never sued Linux users (we actually got one of their cease-and-desist letters) we would not consider them for the following primary reasons:

      • Lack of hardware support
      • Lack of software support
      • Uncertain future

      The last is a bit of a misnomer. I'm almost 100% certain that OpenServer will cease to be developed at all within the next two years and will probably be abandonware Real Soon Now. Even if there was only say a 20% chance that SCO will loose it all, why would anyone bet their hard-earned cash on something with those odds when other products are equally fit for the task and don't have one foot in the grave?

      It sounds like they think they have is a niffty middle-ware stack for cellphones and they want to use that as a hook for selling their Unix stuff. But if their middle-ware stack is so niffty that it would attract developers, why not port it to other systems to widen the audience and build a new business on that? That was the strategy taken by 'old SCO' aka Tarantella before they unloaded unix on Caldera.

      Probably because their middle-ware is really vaporware. I mean come on! Custom ring-tones? Even if the ring-tone business is as big as they claim to be, I have a hard time believing corporations will be interested in "biztones". IMHO, custom ring tones are popular only to teenagers and people in their early twenties. These people are not business managers and probably aren't involved in business beyond starting the timer on the fry cooker. Moreover, The SCO Group doesn't have any established means of targetting this crowd. The SCO Group has always been a business-to-business corporation, not a business-to-consumer corporation. This entire move reeks of a company attempting to convince others that they are innovating and breaking into a whole new market with a new killer product. Of course, they don't have the means to do this, so even if it is feasible for some one to do, it isn't going to be The SCO Group that accomplishes it. Other businesses know this, so SCO tacked on the whole "we're courting UNIX developers with huge prizes including a new BMW and/or $100,000".

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
  83. sign up the homeless by glsunder · · Score: 1

    "SCO is offering cash incentives for developers to attend its upcoming user group conference in Las Vegas in August... attendees completing it will be given US$1000."

    If all you have to do is show up (no test at the end), maybe it'd be a good way to help the homeless in Vegas. Maybe SCO could do something good for a change.

  84. Ferengi Rules of Acquisition, #13 and #189 by hummassa · · Score: 1

    13) anything worth doing is worth doing for money;
    189) let others keep their reputation, keep their money.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  85. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

    Hey, what's the [sic] for?

    Anyway, no, I haven't worked with any servers. I'm just speaking from what I've seen of their laptops. They always seem a little clunky, and I've seen a few hardware problems. Maybe it's more that it offends my design sense than that they're actually fragile, but I dunno...

    The calculators, though, really are worse than they used to be. They're much more plastic and much less metal, and the user interface has been steadily cruftified without anyone taking a step back and reorganizing it so that it acts more like a graphing calculator and less like a scientific calculator with a pixel-addressable screen.

  86. The perfect app by edremy · · Score: 1
    1. Develop neato "biztone" app or whatever the hell else SCO is trying to push
    2. Obfuscated code inside app waits 1-6 months, then auto-installs Linux on server
    3. Profit!
    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  87. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by SparkEE · · Score: 1

    So, you're giving credit for the Alpha to HP? Hmmm, that might get some people in Shrewbury miffed.

  88. I'm stuck with OpenServer by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OpenServer (at least v5.0.5 which I have) is weird. It's better documented than Linux is and can ever hope to be - the docs are more consistent, more accurate, more complete, and better written. It's also incredibly stable in most ways - but with a few REALLY annoying quirks. As it's also stable in the same way a fossil is (What, buy and upgrade? Get bent), that's frustrating. It also has some incredibly annoying limitations, a set of developer tools so bad they boggle the mind (and the alternatives aren't great either - haven't got Skunkware's gcc WORKING yet), and some basic services we're used to just being there ... well ... aren't. Oh, and printing on SCO is one of the worst messes I've ever had the misfortune to work with - it makes Linux printing look like heaven, and it's pretty awful too. If you now feel the need to scour your eyes with steel wool, you're not alone.

    I maintain an OpenServer box for work only because of a legacy app that requires it. Well, strictly, the app requires Microsoft Xenix to run - it's from 1983 (!!) - but SCO OpenServer's XENIX kernel personality does the trick with a few quirks. OpenServer at least supports PCI, >16MB RAM, and >512MB disks, unlike XENIX. (OpenServer 5.0.5 actually supports up to 2TB disks/arrays, >137GB ATA disks, etc. Not bad for an OS from 1995). If it weren't for that need - which Linux can't satisfy even with the defunct ibcs project - I'd be rid of OpenServer in an instant. Linux 2.6 isn't as stable as I'd like, but that's worth it ... and there's always Solaris as an alternative.

    I can't imagine anybody buying OpenServer now. Its only purpose is legacy support. Unixware doesn't even have that. Before Sun released Solaris for free, they had a tiny sliver of hope from people who need more stability than Linux provides ... but with a free Solaris, they're just doomed. RHEL and so on help a fair bit with regards to stability in Linux too - something which also doesn't help SCO in the slightest.

    Even if their technology wasn't obsolete crap, who on earth would buy from a company that sues its own customers? Oh, wait, I use Microsoft software at work and I'm well aware of its involvement in the BSA & BSAA so that's no argument at all... but the obsolete crap point holds.

    1. Re:I'm stuck with OpenServer by schon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I maintain an OpenServer box for work only because of a legacy app that requires it. Well, strictly, the app requires Microsoft Xenix to run - it's from 1983 (!!) [...] - which Linux can't satisfy even with the defunct ibcs project

      I've just finished moving a company from a similar thing. It required some modifications to x286emul, but it runs flawlessly (and *much* faster) on Linux than on OpenSewer.

    2. Re:I'm stuck with OpenServer by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
      Why haven't you ported the app to Linux, Solaris, or BSD yet, or better yet, make it easily portable to any Unix variant? Do you not have the source to this app? If not, why did you(or whoever was there before you) allow this situation to happen?

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    3. Re:I'm stuck with OpenServer by jimicus · · Score: 1

      If:

      - The app is crucial to the business.
      - The business isn't prepared or able to port it to something more sensible (After all, why bother? It works, doesn't it?)

      Then there is a strong chance that the grandparent is left with no option: just get the damn thing working.

      Of course, if the gp has any sense he's got a plan up his sleeve for when the box dies and he can't find anything which SCO will run on, but that's another matter altogether.

    4. Re:I'm stuck with OpenServer by Mancat · · Score: 1

      Mind sharing what application it is, and what it's for? I'm curious now.

      --
      hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    5. Re:I'm stuck with OpenServer by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      It's an accounts and newspaper bookings system. It's writen in a "4GL" called Plain English in 1991. The company that created the runtime had ceased to exist long before the app was writen - we're using Plain English from 1893. I've never been able to comprehend how anybody could choose a proprietary 4GL from a long defunct company for the basis of their new mission-critical app ... especially when it's not very good. I suspect the situation boiled down to the "developer" being incapable of using anything else - he's more of a business systems analyst and accountant than a developer, and my god does it show in the code.

      The modern equivalent would be a business system written in VBA on top of Access 1.0 (presuming it had VBA), now, in 2006.

      More info in response to another poster too, in case you care.

      I inherited this abominable situation and have been trying to find a way to get the business out of it for some time. Doubly so since the creator of the software is becoming more and more unrealiable (think: errattic, alcoholic, drops out of touch for months, etc) and the system needs fixes periodically to keep it running because of the incredibly crap underlying runtime and some bad decisions by the developer of the system its self.

      It's being replaced, but because it's so neatly tailored to the business and so important that's a slow process. In the mean time ... I get to maintian OpenServer. I think OpenServer is by far and away the best part of the situation, but that doesn't make it nice.

    6. Re:I'm stuck with OpenServer by smash · · Score: 1
      If documentation is a pet hate of linux, then check out FreeBSD. It has more of a "commercial unix" feel/flavour to it, and the documentation in my experience has always been pretty top notch.

      It's also many, many times faster/more responsive than SCO...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  89. Just for the record ... by Keyslapper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope we see some mention of this illustrious event in a future slashback posting ...

  90. Unix Developers to SCO: by Knight2K · · Score: 1

    Bite our wide, geeky, asses!

    SCO to Unix Developers: Yeah, well, we're going to have our own conference. With giveaways! And hookers! In fact, forget the giveaways!

    --
    ======
    In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
  91. Re:SCO changing its image to new investors by KJSwartz · · Score: 1

    It really sounds like SCO is ***BEGGING*** developers to come back, all is well, choke! gurgle!! Gasp!!! just so they have something to put out in a phone call and attract new investors who are ignorant of the last 5 years. Imagine being able to say developer interest rose 250% from the same quarter last year, and the company has a bright shiny future.

    I would consider developing for SCOX *Nix after Darl says he's leaving and only when he follows through on THAT promise.

  92. Is Darl an "Engineer" by phunctor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Israeli intelligence has come up with some interesting applications for cellphones. Is that wireless enough?

  93. Good Luck With That... by bratwiz · · Score: 1

    Earth to SCO....

    PTHTHTHTHTHTHthththththththt !!!

    Hope you scrotes choke on it and DIE

    You guys give ASSHOLES a bad name

  94. Hey Darl... by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

    As they say on Fark:

    DIAF!

    --

    No matter where you go... there you are.
  95. Did anybody want to? by mmell · · Score: 1
    Or, to put it another way . . .

    Let's say you start distributing your old BeOS install disks. The company which owns the IP on BeOS can sue you, but by showing that the product is no longer commercially available, you should be able to avoid both criminal and civil penalties.

    Yes, the code is out of your reach, but you can redistribute BeOS with relative impugnity.

    Then again, IANAL. It's quite possible you could be sued back to the stone age.

    1. Re:Did anybody want to? by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Informative
      Let's say you start distributing your old BeOS install disks. The company which owns the IP on BeOS can sue you, but by showing that the product is no longer commercially available, you should be able to avoid both criminal and civil penalties.


      I've never heard of any law that says that you are allowed to violate copyrights simply because the product is not commercially available. The copyright holder might not have as much motivation to sue you, since they weren't making money off the product anyway, but you're equally culpable either way.


      Yes, the code is out of your reach, but you can redistribute BeOS with relative impugnity.


      I believe you are wrong about that. It would be nice if the law worked that way, but AFAIK it doesn't.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  96. RIP DEC by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's Shrewsbury, actually. Although I doubt there's anyone there anymore to get offended. I don't know what's in Digital's old building, but they're long gone from that area, as are most of the old Boston-based minicomputer companies. (Data General, Prime...so many others.)

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:RIP DEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wang Labs is still around under their new name of Getronics. A small VS mainframe group still exists in Tewksbury, in the North Street facility that was the first substantial one where Wang was located way back before taking over the city of Lowell. The VS mainframe is still ticking in a thousand or two sites around the world. The VS is also being neatly reborn by way of virtualization here.

  97. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by kcbrown · · Score: 1
    It's a pity...I actually like their product. Time to give postgres a gander I suppose.

    I'm betting you won't regret the move. PostgreSQL kicks some very serious ass these days.
    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  98. My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Informative

    iirc, it was SCO who paid mysql money for them to support SCO users, not the other way around.

    Right. I went back and read TFA, and Mysql is NOT sponsoring this. Neither is HP. They are offering Mysql and HP "training," and smearing those company's names in the eyes of those who don't read carefully enough (the poster I replied to, and myself to name two).

    I stand corrected: Again, MYSQL and HP are NOT Sponsors of SCO's laughable ploy, and probably have nothing whatsoever (or as little as possible) to do with SCO.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I stand corrected: Again, MYSQL and HP are NOT Sponsors of SCO's laughable ploy, and probably have nothing whatsoever (or as little as possible) to do with SCO.

      Bullshit. Google for SCO Forum 2006. Click the "sponsors" link. Read that HP is a Platinum Sponsor and MySQL AB is a Gold Sponsor. Now, that may mean $10 and $5 respectively, but you can bet your butt they're letting SCO use their names in the advertising.

      Your idea of "as little as possible" covers a whole lot more than mine.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Right. I went back and read TFA, and Mysql is NOT sponsoring this.

      They may not be sponsoring the wireless cr*p from SCO, but MySQL is clearly identified as a "Gold Sponsor" of SCO Forum 2006. See this page: Warning: Flash

      While on the subject: that page must qualify as one of the most pointless uses of flash ever! And are they entering a competition for the ugliest front page to their website?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by Danga · · Score: 1

      While on the subject: that page must qualify as one of the most pointless uses of flash ever! And are they entering a competition for the ugliest front page to their website?

      Well what do you expect when SCO can now only get the shittiest people to work for them since they pissed off everyone who has a clue what they did in past?

      By the way I agree that that is one ugly page and use of flash. I think a blind, retarded, schizophrenic, monkey that just did a few lines of coke could bash on a keyboard and create a better webpage than that.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    4. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      I think a blind, retarded, schizophrenic, monkey that just did a few lines of coke could bash on a keyboard and create a better webpage than that.

      It's true! I banged my keyboard against my desk until it broke, and a Flash site popped out!

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    5. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by Amouth · · Score: 1

      you have to watch that alittle..

      that is a "Forum" where you have many companys - sure SCO is the main but it is also a player in the OS area and both HP and mySQL have products that run on it and they have an intrest in getting their product into that market share even if it is small..

      that does not mean that they are supporting the company SCO - it just means it want's people that use SCO products and like to talk about them to also use theirs.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Even before that, half of the graphics on SCO's was the same as on Novel's site. The graphics mysteriously change about a week after I Emailed novel about it.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    7. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Google for SCO Forum 2006. Click the "sponsors" link. Read that HP is a Platinum Sponsor and MySQL AB is a Gold Sponsor. Now, that may mean $10 and $5 respectively, but you can bet your butt they're letting SCO use their names in the advertising.
      Your idea of "as little as possible" covers a whole lot more than mine.


      I dislike SCO as much as the next guy, but there's a healthy limit that should be honored. People like the parent poster are dangerous...ready to snap at any moment.

      And no, I'm not a psychologist, I just have a fair share of intelligence.

    8. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I dislike SCO as much as the next guy, but there's a healthy limit that should be honored. People like the parent poster are dangerous...ready to snap at any moment.

      Darl for the win! Seriously, man, I always suspected you secretly hung out here but I was never really sure before.

    9. Re:My Bad - Mysql and HP are NOT SCO sponsors! by ausoleil · · Score: 1

      Good for you, Freeuser. Seriously. A mea culpa on Slashdot is as rare as an honest press release from SCO. You buck the trend.

  99. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by HiThere · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've called for support on their printers...and they ended up on my "do not buy" list.

    Yes, it was an end-user printer. So? I rate a company based first on my experiences with it, then on reports from other people. That inevitably means that if their consumer products are shoddy, I will consider the company a manufacturer of shoddy goods. And HP isn't quite there...the printer is cheap, but not shoddy. Their technical support, however, is shoddy.

    I don't expect the kind of quality from a commercial product that I expect from a professional level product, but if a company cheats one set of users, then the company is a cheat and cannot be trusted with a more expensive purchase. It's true that some companies beleive in only cheating the mass-market customers...or at least that there are voices that proclaim so. (But voices are cheap, and astroturfing has been with us for a long time, and I don't know WHO wrote the post I'm replying to.)

    OTOH, HP *used* to make quality merchandise. When it did so, it advertised the fact. I still remember their ad about the HP-51 (I think it was) calculator that fell off the hood of a jeep in Alaska, and was buried in the road all winter, chewed up by a snow-plow the next summer, and still worked. Been a long time since I've seen one of those ads.

    I remember the disk drive company (not HP) back when auto-parking heads first came out that noted at the show that the drive they were running from had fallen down two flights of stairs onto a concrete loading deck while they were unpacking the exhibit. (Well, that's not remarkable anymore, but at the time it was startling.)

    Computers have, in general, become more durable. HP seems to have been defying the trend. Perhaps their very expensive models are better...but I prefer to get to know a company through inexpensive purchases. If they work out, then I move them up the purchase pyramid. I rarely buy something expensive from a company as my first deal with them. HP has been moving DOWN the pyramid. They used to be near the top. Now ... well, I still buy replacement ink-jet cartridges with their brand on it. Until I chose my next printer. After that they are likely to be totally OFF my purchase list. And it's their technical support that made that final difference...but it was decreasing quality that got them moved NEAR to the bottom.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  100. SCOX stick ticker app by sprior · · Score: 1

    Next killer mobile application - a realtime SCOX stock ticker and "days to covers shorts" display.

  101. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by gumbright · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    No, doofus. His duck.

    OK. That was lame, unlike your comment. I would have given you a point if I had any right now.

  102. Elbows to the Rescue! by bratwiz · · Score: 2, Funny



    Yeah, but SCO doesn't need any of that stuff...

    I on the other hand would propose to ram a wireless, internet-controlled ...

    "seven foot asbestos filled, napalm coated broken Galiano bottle covered with sandpaper, spikes, barbs, hooks, old rusty razor blades, used syringes, electrically charged copper coils, anonymous pubic hair, and curare that's playing Amazing Grace like a barbershop quartet with feelin' and Boston Pops' orchestral accompanyment using the Vienna Boys Choir to keep time, so the bunch of line backers ramming it in and playing with the dials, buttons, keyes, joy stick, knobs, mouse and conducting baton that all adjusts the intensity, depth, rate, length and HARDNESS can push in proper rhythm while moving through a temporal loop putting it all through eternity, then back to the beginning to start again ..."

    up Darrel McBride's ass, and also the respective asses of all the executive assholes at SCO-- and their lawyers-- TWICE... with FEELING

    (** credits to "elbows" mailing list many CPU cycles ago...)

  103. We don't need to say anything by Chazman · · Score: 1

    One finger will suffice. OK, two if you're British.

    --
    -----Chaz
  104. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by mytec · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...and they've chosen to sponsor this despite that knowledge

    One could also say that MySQL is supporting their customers who may not have a choice of platform. If I understand correctly, MySQL was supported on SCO and than it wasn't for a time and now it is. I doubt all administrators of SCO systems drink the Kool-Aid SCO offers and would love to switch platforms but cannot due to money, personel, or software that would need to be ported. Sometimes transitions start in phases and running MySQL on SCO might be the start (or an intermediate step) of proving that the existing system can be moved to another platform. I applaud MySQL AB for sticking by customers who are in a less than appealing situation. Someday those administrators or DBAs may find themselves in different jobs and they will probably be more likely to choose MySQL AB products if those products aren't already in place. Additionally if these people choose MySQL sometime back, having the support from MySQL must have been a relief for a number of reasons.

    I don't believe users should have to suffer for someone elses mistakes but the big point here, to me, is that MySQL AB is supporting its users and isn't that what we want from any company or source of our choice of tools?

  105. Unix developers to SCO: by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 1

    You can take your incentives, your cash, and your BMW, and go die in a fire.

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.
  106. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to give postgres a gander I suppose.

    i've been using it for nearly 2 years... i don't thin it will disappoint. the various mailing lists are very useful.

    good luck.

  107. My question to SCO how are you going to pay them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCO's stocks are about worthless, the company is trying to sue their way to a profit, just about everyone under the sun is abandoning UNIX in the buisness world, and the company is being run into the ground. So how are they going to pay these folks that are desperate enough to sign on? And for the folks who do sign on will other companies be able to hire you after you sign the Non-compete agreement? So developers just how are they going to pay you and once they do how will they repay you for your work?

    SCO is a company I would never join if i had the skill. Plenty of others out there working on the next version of windows drivers and software to keep you employed and there are Linux companies looking for skilled workers too.

  108. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

    I agree that the calculators have gotten much worse.

    I would partially disagree, however, about the printers... I have had an hp LaserJet 1320 for a while, and I like it so far. (That's a link to a review on my web site.) Their tech support was also very nice, at least the one time I needed to talk to them. I can't speak for the inkjets, as I religiously avoid recommending inkjets to people (like my dad, who bought the 1320), because they eat cartridges.

  109. Hey McBride.. You got some bad Karma comming by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    Where does mcBride get off? All the innovative programmers will not touch SCO. I'm not a programming whore. SCO's point was made. They lost market share due to an Open Source operating system and decided to sue. Idiots.

    So SCO go ahead, invest in creating your mobile tool whatever, you will just be losing $$$ since no one want's to use it.

  110. Are you kidding? by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After everything they've done to shit on open source, they have the balls to announce this? Unbelievable. And if anyone here participates in this then you should never speak about open source again. Nor should you ever bitch about anything MS does, because participating in this would be the biggest sellout of all time.

    --


    My sig of choice is Marlboro
  111. Dear SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have already replaced you with a small Perl script. Get lost.

  112. That must have been some meeting by BigCheese · · Score: 1

    They must have been very high when they came up with this.

    --
    The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  113. How can they afford to pay the $100,000? by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Me, I'd worry that they'd hand you a cashier's check for $2,000,000 and ask you to send the change back to their new corporate office in Lagos.

    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
  114. Seinfeld - The Smelly Car by slashflood · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is more like the Seinfeld episode The Smelly Car

    "The strong body odor of a valet is left in Jerry's car. Jerry is forced to try to sell the car, because the odor has taken a life of its own and permeated everything. George is turned by Susan's new outlook on life. Susan's friend is swayed to heterosexuality by Kramer, though later turned back off by a whiff of a jacket that Kramer borrowed from Jerry. When the car can't be sold, Jerry winds up leaving it and the keys out on the street."

    IIRC, it was a BMW.

  115. Who's BMW is it? by joschm0 · · Score: 0

    I wonder if that's Darl's personal car that he's giving away. That shows how desparate he is.

    --
    01/20/09
  116. Two bottles of whining. by SlashdotTroll · · Score: 5, Funny

    two re-hired SCO developers telnet to the SCO server after a night in the basement.

    arroot: so...
    SCOdev: what?
    arroot: how 'bout scheduling a grep job to see if there is any SCO IP in Linux?
    SCOdev: are you crazy?  what if the server is logging and the resource throttle triggers an alarm to the CEO?
    arroot: but I love you so much.
    SCOdev: it's too risky.
    arroot: pleeeeease?

    *login*

    IBMdev: SEC said it's "ok" to give the AIX repository a grep job, or SEC will come down to perform a grep job, or I can do it.  But for Gates' sakes don't use /bin/wall to echo your chat to all the terminals.

    --

    I am the nightmare of nightmares.

    1. Re:Two bottles of whining. by Sirfrummel · · Score: 1

      Did you do that? Holy crap, that's *awesome*.

    2. Re:Two bottles of whining. by TheIrishScion · · Score: 1

      Oh lordy but that was funny! Took me a minute to work out what was going on, then pffft! Coke on the keyboard and people sticking their head in my door to see what the laughing was about....

      Well done!

    3. Re:Two bottles of whining. by TwoTailedFox · · Score: 1

      I feel so very sad knowing where that text's tone was based off of XD

      --
      ~The TwoTailedFox posts again....
  117. Incorrect Summary by eric2hill · · Score: 1
    Let's see here. From the summary:

    It doesn't stop there; there's a 12-cylinder BMW or $100,000 dollars for the development of the best wireless application.

    And from the article:

    SCO is also offering a 10-cylinder BMW car or a US$100,000 cash prize for the developers who use the toolkit to produce the best wireless applications.

    So either the poster or SCO itself isn't firing on all cylinders?
    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    LOADING...
    READY.
    RUN
  118. Not me by waif69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still have SCO on 5 1/4" disks. Now if I can only find my 5 1/4" drive...

    1. Re:Not me by nocomment · · Score: 1

      I have a really old copy of sco somewhere that came on a like a 6" long tape.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    2. Re:Not me by dhalgren · · Score: 2, Informative

      Coding was SO much more efficient back then. Today it would take many feet of tape.

    3. Re:Not me by Cicero382 · · Score: 1

      "I still have SCO on 5 1/4" disks. Now if I can only find my 5 1/4" drive..."

      I've got one. That'll be $699 please.

      (Oops!)

  119. Sweet deal! by Builder · · Score: 1

    With the level of trust that SCO has, I'm guessing the entries will be thin on the ground.

    That should make it MUCH easier to scoop that top prize. I already know what I'm going to build...

    A wireless solution for filing frivilous lawsuits and releasing bullshit 'press releases' to artificially prop up a failing company... I'm onto a winner here, I just know it!

  120. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by jimmypw · · Score: 1

    How so are they evil? Their giving you access to an enterprise quality database server with no catches apart from it is free for non-commercial use. And your bitching about then not giving you access to everything they create. Follow the open source trend. YOu have the source code, Read it and write what you need for yourself.

    Ofcourse if you had paid for the enterprise version the instalation would probably be mission crirical and therefore you would have access to such tools.

  121. This is way too easy by paiute · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Darl have a brother on the legal team? Isn't money going from SCO to the legal team? Does Darl have a cousin who can write code? Who will judge what the "best" application is?

    If you look around the table and can't spot the mark, it's you.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  122. FALSE! HP and MySQL are ''GOLD'' sponsors by jabbo · · Score: 3, Informative

    of the SCO conference... see http://www.caldera.com/2006forum/index_flash.html and click on 'Sponsors'. So at the very least, MySQL AB is sponsoring SCO's conference

    Quote from TFA:
    > To draw Unix developers back into its embrace, SCO is offering cash incentives for
    > developers to attend its upcoming user group conference in Las Vegas in August.

    Quote from promotional materials for the above user group conference:
    > SCO and MySQL AB have teamed to create the ideal applications platform SMB and
    > replicated/branch enterprise computing environments. With SCO and MySQL, you gain the
    > competitive advantages offered by both open standards and open source.

    MySQL AB is listed as a 'Gold' sponsor and the preceding is the copy for that placement.

    --
    Remember that what's inside of you doesn't matter because nobody can see it.
  123. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, doofus. His duck.

    OK. That was lame, unlike your comment. I would have given you a point if I had any right now.

    Woulda been better if you'd said goose :)
  124. Anything is possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, it's kind of creepy thinking how this might be "informative"

    And I do mean ANYTHING. Even a goatse redirect got modded up as informative once. It was germaine to the discussion (redirecting or phishing or something like that), and it was obvious what it was. No attempt to trick anyone.

  125. Darl McBride - may you rot in hell by pbegley · · Score: 5, Informative

    Darl -

    Hi, its Paul. You don't remember me because you weren't associated with SCO at the time, but I was an SCO developer and beta tester 'back in the day'. I ran a public access SCO UNIX system in Philadelphia. I (helped) run the UNIX SIG on CompuServe and converted a bunch of applications so they ran on SCO platforms. On the commercial side, SCO UNIX ran construction management and engineering procurement software for a $500MM project (it no longer runs on SCO).

    Not any more, Darl. That ship has sailed. I'm a 50 year old, bald, bearded engineer and I'm mad as hell at you Darl. I will do anything in my power to make sure you fail. I grep'ed through old source code just to find prior art (and I still have source from 1984).

    I'm not alone Darl. We are the decision makers now. Money and cars don't cut it. Your goin' down, Darl, and the harder the better.

    Your pal,
    Paul

    1. Re:Darl McBride - may you rot in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be pissed. SCO ("Santa Cruz Operation") was a respectable, though small, name at one time. Oh well.

  126. PRESS RELEASE: SCO Wireless App Winner Announced by javaxjb · · Score: 1

    The winner, 12 year old prodigy Seth Hartstone announced, "After running several statistical projections, I determined the odds that SCO or its remianing assets would have any value by the time I could drive my new BMW were nil. Thus, I could drive away with a clear conscience by the time I would reap any benefits from my momentary lapse of willpower."

    --
    Programmers in mirror are brighter than they appear
  127. Wonderful Strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alienate your development community and then bribe them to get them back on board.

  128. Unix developers to SCO: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unix developers to SCO:

    Go to hell.

    Sincerely,
    Unix developers everywhere

  129. Intel version of UNIX? by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    Need I say it? Open-source version of UNIX for Intel?

    Some revisionist history going here. It's like BSD isn't only dead, it never existed.

    FreeBSD!

  130. Ob South Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Can Change by South Park
    -._*-._*-._*-._*-._*-._*-
    Some people say that i'm a bad guy..
    They may be right, they may be right.
    But it's not as if I don't try..
    I just fuck up, try as I might

    But I can change, I can change!
    I can learn to keep my promises, I swear it!
    I'll open up my heart and I will share it..
    Any minute now I will be born again!

    Yes I can change, I can change!
    I know i've been a dirty little bastard
    I like to kill! I like to maim! Yes, I'm insane!
    But it's okay, 'COS I CAN CHANGE!!

    It's not my fault that i'm so evil..
    It's society, society.
    You see my parents were sometimes abusive..
    And it made, a prick of me.

    But I can change, I can change!
    Satan: What if you remain a sandy little butthole?
    Hey Satan! Don't be such a twit
    Mother Teresa won't have shit on me!

    Here I am, just watch me change..
    Here you go, i'm changing!

    Sure buddy. I was born yesterday.

  131. Darl's Priority by sadler121 · · Score: 1

    Apparently, You can buy anything in this world for money. ;-)

  132. V12 != V10 by MADnificent · · Score: 1
    The article states
    SCO is also offering a 10-cylinder BMW
    Note 10 != 12. That means you get an M5 or an M6 instead of a 760i or 760Li... I would be happy with any of them, but it is a rather important rectification, since both series are targetted at completely different people.
  133. Unix Developers to SCO by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    STFU

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  134. Ok, lets talk Unix! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, lets see what we have here. SCO Unix, a Unix variant which isn't really well known apart ofcourse from the black suiing pages. Further more; to use it I'd have to cough up quite some cash. But what can SCO Unix offer me more? Perhaps paying up even more to be allowed and use their development tools. I wonder what would happen if I fail to understand some of their licenses.

    Now, on the other hand I know of this other company which also does something with Unix which, strangely enough, is available for free. Not only that, they even allow me to use their development tools completely free of charge. Not just that, no, whenever I use one of their products they send me a full license for the specific product which doesn't expire, doesn't allow this other company to suddenly go back on their promise, doesn't limit me to use their products and most of all: doesn't have this weird taste of hypocracy.

    This other company even allows me to use their tools and technology to do some nifty mobile programming and I don't even have to attend any courses if I don't want to. Just read or download a tutorial online.

    Gee, this is a hard choice. Do I go for some money which hardly covers my expenses and the option of a free car or do I go with free stuff available now which can (and is likely to:) dramaticly increase my options to find myself a nice job.

    Such tough choices, NOT.

  135. Re:troll? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sticks and stone may break my bones, but mods will never hurt me. :)

    I just don't get the whole BMW/MB thing. They still look like cars my grandfather would drive.

  136. Its all in the terms and conditions, lol by mlwmohawk · · Score: 4, Informative

    I won't post the link, because SCO shouldn't boast "users" because of this, however.....

    Some nice items:
    "You must be a qualified developer with the .Net and Java development platforms, having developed on those platforms. You must be able to demonstrate proficiency with these platform languages and may be asked to submit an example of Java application you or your company has developed."

    So, they can say you are not qualified because they have given no criteria about what is or what is not qualified.

    You need this much machine:

    "a. Memory 768MB, HIGHLY recommend 1GB plus
    b. Windows XP Pro or Windows 2003 server (Windows XP Home will not work)
    c. Processor speed - faster the better, at minimum should be Pentium (P4 class) 1.8 - 2.0GHz plus.
    d. If firewall software is installed, it must be configurable.
    e. Need to be able to disable anti virus software"

    This would require having Windows XP Pro or 2K3 Server, no thanks.

    It would cost more than $1000 to get to vegas, stay at a hotel, make sure you have the software & hardware needed.

    So, $1000? Not worth it.

    1. Re:Its all in the terms and conditions, lol by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      What in the hell are they doing with .NET and Java?

      Hmm...

      On second thought, smart move, making something cross-platform. I can understand wanting to switch to ANY platform rather than stay with ANY of the ones you developed/support, and making sure that the next time you have to dump a shitty platform (*cough* Windows XP *cough*) that you don't have to give away a car to get people to help you make the switch.

      Hmm...

      But why XP? Seems like the most unnatural upgrade path in the world. You'd think they'd jump straight to OS X -- proprietary platform, you're probably making them buy hardware anyway, but it's at least Unix-based...

      Nevermind. Trying to understand the way SCO thinks is like trying to understand the way Ralphie thinks.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  137. Here's my code entry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #include

    int main (int argc, char **argv[])
    {
                    printf ("Take this code with you, and its mobile. By the way Darl, go fuck yourself.\n\n ps. Thanks for the free BMW.\n");

                    return 0;
    }

  138. You'd /hope/ so! by Morosoph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend of mine who is a freelance engineer found that an engineer at one place he was contracting hadn't heard of Linux (this was a few months ago!)

    If you act automatically, send in your CV, stay within "course boundaries" etcetera, it can be amazing what you miss!

    1. Re:You'd /hope/ so! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      A software engineer???
      I hope not. Tell me he doesn't develop for Unix.
      There are morons every where but my goodness.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:You'd /hope/ so! by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he hadn't heard of Linux, but he was planning to investigate this new "OS/2" thing that he had heard mentioned.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    3. Re:You'd /hope/ so! by Morosoph · · Score: 1

      A hardware guy.

      It's not so bad, but still, he is now doing software, and somehow...

    4. Re:You'd /hope/ so! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay I can see that depending on what type of hardware he does. Thank goodness I was afraid I was going to have to convert to Amish and give up on software development.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  139. Guys, it's only a V-10! by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 1
    It's not a 12 banger, read the article.

    Fuckers are trying to get away two pistons cheaper! Screw 'em. If it was a v-12 I'm there, but for only a v-10? Got to hell SCO!

  140. 12-cylinder BMW? It's a lie. by smcdow · · Score: 1
    As we all know, real BMWs have two wheels.

    There's no such thing as a 12-cylinder motorcycle engine.

    --
    In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    1. Re:12-cylinder BMW? It's a lie. by dan828 · · Score: 1

      Hell...not only do they have 10 and 12 cyclinder motorcycles, someone build a 48 cyclinder one. http://www.bigbikeriders.com/48cyl.htm

  141. Why so polite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    SCO's reputation is now squat in the tech industry.

    Slashdot posts are getting awfully mild these days...

  142. Unix Developers to SCO: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Die slow in a fucking fire.

  143. Here's my Code by ehaggis · · Score: 1

    #! /bin/bash
    echo "Give me the money and car now!"
    eof

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  144. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me explain why the [sic] is present in the following:
    HP, I [sic]could care less about (their computers are cheap
    This sentence implies you care to some amount, but could lower that amount by caring less.

    The correct usage is this:
    HP, I couldn't care less about (their computers are cheap
    This demonstrates you do not care at all, so it is impossible to care any less.

  145. Legal teams by shr1v3n · · Score: 1

    McBride said the case against IBM "is scheduled to come to trial in early 2007. We continue to feel we have a strong case and we're looking forward to our day in court. But while the legal teams have been off litigating, the business team has been busy innovating." So.. they have multiple legal teams, but only one business team? I guess they do care more about litigation.

  146. Wrong Category by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This should be under 'its funny, laugh'

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  147. shareholder lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ralph Yarro, the former Canopy's scavenger, and SCO's Darl McBride hold together some 36% of equity. Add the shares of several mamagers and senior officials and you pass the 50% mark. These are all involved in the Linux exhortition scheme up to their nostrils. They are not going to sue themselves.

    The other shareholders are speculators trying to get rid of their shares or still stubbornly hoping for cash should the case really go to a jury. Quite unlikely that they are going to make a fuss, although among vultures you never know.

    It is certainly not a case of serious and sober shareholders being abused by the management.

  148. According to the article... by Dieppe · · Score: 1
    SCO is offering cash incentives to attend their workshop, hm?

    Well, why not take it if you've nothing better going on? Doesn't mean you have to do anything with it after all, consider the workshop a nice development vacation. Doesn't mean you have to develop anything with it.

    And if you do. Just make sure it blatantly says "SCO SUCKS" all over it. :)

    That'll teach 'em.

    Can they go chapter 11 yet???

  149. Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darl,

    We have ethics. For the love of God, bugger off.

    Unix developers.

  150. Seems to me I vaguely recall something . . . by mmell · · Score: 1
    to the effect that software which is neither commercially available nor commercially supported gets dropped in the "public domain" bucket. The argument I recall had to do with somebody sharing Windows3.1 around the time W2K was released.

    I could very well be dead wrong. Oh, well. My original assertion still stands - take advantage of SCO's offer. At worst, you've entered a lottery for a BMW. Just don't sign anything in blood . . .

  151. I wonder? by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    After legal fees, will SCO have enough money to buy a 4 cylinder BMW?

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  152. I can see it now... by NoScreenNamesLeft · · Score: 1

    SCO sues hundreds of beginners for infringing on their application SCO HelloWare. As a result, the default beginner's app has been changed to, "Hello, Earth!", which SCO is expected to sue in a few days.

    --
    It is the owner that crashes the system. If you are enough of an idiot to put 50 background processes in Windows you sho
  153. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by budgenator · · Score: 1

    HP used to be a company of engineers, making products for engineers and scientists, they turned into a company of marketer making things for consumers so the CEO could flip stock options, now these seem to be trying to find a profitable middle-ground now that Carly is gone.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  154. Bender says darl can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bite my shiny metal ass.

  155. Time sure flies... by davmoo · · Score: 1

    Damn...is it April 1st again already?

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  156. Shove it McBride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you McBride. Choke on the little that's left of your worthless shithole company.

  157. Go back? Are you mad!!!?? by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

    Why would a *nix developer want to develop software on a software platform provided by a dodgy company that is suing it customers and that will most likely only be in business for a few more years?

  158. They might as well... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    They might as well just change their focus to producing adware and spyware instead.... at this rate people couldn't hate them any worse than they already do.

  159. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
    HP should have saved their money and sponsored something less controversial, a NAMBLA convention for example.

    I don't get what SCO think they are achieving here, the company is dead. Most developers are not going to support their platform on principle and those who don't have a problem with the lawsuit are still going to avoid it because there is no critical mass. Thats why the nimrods started the lawsuit in the first place.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  160. His plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once he gets his money, if ever, and that's a huge if, he'll leave SCO. Ring tone is just something, anything, to make him looks like he has a real work to do in the mean time.

  161. Anyone thinking of signing up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd think it'd be wise to read carefully through the contracts one has to sign, multiple times. I don't believe there's a free lunch, especially with the current SCO, one probably will lose more than one gets.

  162. UNIX/Linux developer to SCO by obnoxiousbastard · · Score: 1

    Get lost you patent-whoring nobodies!

    --
    Is that a SCSI connector or are you just glad to see me?
  163. Here's one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeff Merkey

  164. Got a magic "source code" wand? by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

    I don't have the source code. Trust me, if I did, I'd have ported it quite some time ago. As for not having the source ... the person making the decisions when the app was written just wasn't aware of the issues.

    The problem is in fact not the application its self - that was custom built and we do have the source - but the runtime it sits on. It's an early database-integrated 4GL called Plain English. The company that wrote the runtime is long dead. In fact, it was out of business more than eight years before the system developed on top of the runtime was developed, and I've never been able to understand how on earth they chose to use this ancient 4GL for the project.

    I've actually written a replacement runtime based on the documentation I have on Plain English, but it looks like the code we have relies on quite a bit of undocumented behaviour. It's not well enough written to handle unexpected issues or error conditions successfully - in fact I'd describe it as hideous undocumented spaghetti from hell - so testing is awfully painful. Given the reliability level required it's not a practical approach, and even if it were, I'd just be maintaining hideous spaghetti from hell on top of a new runtime. Um, yay.

    Did I mention the integrated database without transaction support that is corrupted if a client unexpectedly disconnects? Same issue with telnet disconnects and the old dumb terminals (no longer used) being turned off - it's just crap software. What about the lovely code-in-database setup that is prone to corruption if the incredibly flakey custom editor runs into any issues? Yes, Plain English is clearly the height of modern software development...

    The system is being replaced, but in the mean time, I have to keep OpenServer kicking along. Ugh.

  165. SCO by noopm · · Score: 1

    SCO = So Cluelessly Outtathegame
    All they need now is a "Developers! Developers! Developers!" gig...

  166. Speaking as a developer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey As a developer, why would we develop for a system for a company which is going to be liquidated within the next 12 months?? It doesnt make any financial sense. If this company was run out of australia, all directors/managers/ceo would be thrown in prison for very long sentances for knowingly running a business without fudiciary care, and I do mean long, min 5 years, ask the directors of the insurance company HIH! and there is no recourse to earn after that as any book deals etc are considered to be profiting from a crime and therefore all assets, commercial and personal will be seized as a further offense had occured. Americans need to take a long hard look at their accountability standards! Then again whilst bush and its mates are in power Justice is only for those with a bit check book with checks made out to the republican party. Suck scum and die SCO!

  167. Wireless App? by madbawa · · Score: 1

    How about an SMS spam blocker/filter?

  168. after much deliberation... by smash · · Score: 1
    Training in SCO's EdgeBuilder developer kit will be offered at the conference; attendees completing it will be given US$1000.

    Minus $699 SCO license, minus cost of conference attendance, minus cost of user licenses, minus pain and suffering dealing with the most (IMHO) painful unix variant I have ever dealt with (I've only used/been admin on a couple of SCO variants, Solaris, FreeBSD and most of the major Linux distros though)...

    How does "fuck you SCO" sound? :)

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:after much deliberation... by smash · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, my bad... according to TFA, some companies have been charged $1399 per cpu license of Linux (and thus, SCO is more expensive I presume)? Hahaha....

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  169. errata... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We actually intended to say...
    We want you(r) back.

    -Santa Cruz Operations.

  170. Unix Developers to SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unix Developers to SCO:

    Go to hell SCO!

  171. A strange thing happened on /. today... by Cicero382 · · Score: 1

    An article about SCO wanting to recruit developers appeared and was heavily commented on. No surprise there, except...

    SCO should be reading /. and realising they're on a hiding to nothing. WE are the people they are targeting and the overwhelming response is "You must be kidding!"

    Could this be the first time that /. actually affects a corporate* initiative directly?

    * I use the term "corporate" loosely - actually I should have said "^**!!@" (no, not rot13)

  172. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by Nutria · · Score: 1

    especially the Alpha (R.I.P.)

    Alpha isn't dead, yet.
    http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/byos/op envmsservers.html

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  173. Have they check fsf.org? Have lots of developers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have they check fsf.org? Have lots of developers!

    They will tell sco what to do with the bmw and the big bucks for sure.

  174. why 100k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey McBride why only 100,000 or a BMW. Is this worth that much to you, guess what. Just pay the money you got from those private investors when you tried to sue linux. Say in the range of 10 million; it not like you dont have it huh?

  175. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 1

    I'm been a PostgreSQL user for a few years now. Damn fine database, complete with triggers, RI, stored procs, etc. It's replication situation isn't quite solid yet (several add-on products, no clear leader), but scripting up a satisifactory work-around is typically a breeze.

    A newcomer to the open source DB scene is Ingres - it went open source just over a year ago. I've used Ingres at various times in the last 20 years and it too is a totally solid performer. It's much bigger than PostgreSQL - has all the toys and them some, of course including replication.

    These are two serious contenders for database jobs, and should be considered by anyone fleeing from the pointy end of MySQL's pitchfork. To offer a general guideline, I'd say it's appropriate to use PostgreSQL for light to heavy lifting, and Ingres for heavy to super-heavy. And Ingres does high-availability better - it even runs on OpenVMS 7.3+!

    --
    - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
  176. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by operagost · · Score: 1
    Hey, what's the [sic] for?
    Sorry, it's using "could care less" when "couldn't care less" is correct. My internal grammar Nazi asserted itself most inappropriately.
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  177. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by operagost · · Score: 1

    DEC was acquired by Compaq was acquired by HP.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  178. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by operagost · · Score: 1

    Alpha sales are ending in October.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  179. How? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    Where did SCO get $100k? If I were an IBM lawyer, I'd try to get the assets frozen.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  180. Unix developers to SCO.... by bmk67 · · Score: 1

    ... Bwhahahahahahaha!

  181. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Alpha sales are ending in October.

    And then there's the aftermarket.

    We'll be using Alpha/OpenVMS for another 2 years on most projects, migrating piecemeal to Linux+Oracle over the next 5 years.

    And then, no more DCL. [sniff, sniff, blubber]

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  182. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by v8uk · · Score: 1

    I am a bit lost here. Is MySQL providing products or tools only to $$$ customers? Which ones? I thought that their GPL software had the same features of their commercial versions.

  183. Some companies are tainted. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    And you are better adviced not to join them.

    I would personally find offensive that somebody would join this company in particular, and would consider it as an indication of a bad trait in character in a job interview (why would anybody want to join a company that has been as unethcial as this one?).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  184. 5 1/4" drive by suitti · · Score: 1

    I have some. Do you want 360KB or 1.2 MB? Do you want dual 3.5" & 5.12" drives? I gots 'em all.

    --
    -- Stephen.
  185. Re:MySQL is sponsoring this?! WTF?! by jimmypw · · Score: 1

    It does, The point i was trying to make is that MySQL is a business. Business models dont work if your product is free, so there has to be an incentive to buy the commercial version so development can continue and the product remains enterprise quality. Without any sales the code would become stale as not as many people would work on it (people are paid to develop it).

    GPL is not just about free software, More the freedom of software.

  186. Re:troll? by chunky+shit+salsa · · Score: 0

    well, actually mods eventually do. with bad enough karma you get limited to only two posts per day, like several hours apart. so you end up creating a bitchbag of logins - it's inconvenient to log in and back out and wastes about 10s of my time. that's alright though, cause my dick is still being sucked during those 10s. Now go get me some chips and the sports section.