Slashdot Mirror


Radio Shack E-Fires 400 Workers

KingSkippus writes "You've got mail! ...and no job! The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is reporting that RadioShack has notified 400 workers by e-mail that they are being laid off. The e-mails state, 'The work force reduction notification is currently in progress. Unfortunately your position is one that has been eliminated.' Nothing says thank you for your years of service to our company quite like an e-boot out the door."

512 comments

  1. HAHA... by alfs+boner · · Score: 5, Funny

    0wned!

    --
    Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
    1. Re:HAHA... by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't decide if that's completely heartless or hilarious..

    2. Re:HAHA... by trix7117 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm going with heartlarious, but that's just me.

    3. Re:HAHA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good riddance. From the many times I have been forced to use Radio Shack, I have had two kinds of people help me. Those who are semi-nice but unable to work the cash register, let alone point me to the radios.. or the ones that obviously think they should be working at NASA, surely these are the same people from college who complained that their professors were idiots, no matter what professor.

      There's just a little e-karma for you.

    4. Re:HAHA... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

      Frankly, with the type of people that I see at my local Radio Shack (LA Area) I am surprised that they could figure out how to check their email. These folks are on par with Fry's employees.



      Place a curse on 'em

    5. Re:HAHA... by Lightzout · · Score: 2, Funny

      The manager who fired them must have said to himself, "They have email? Computers cost alot of money! We are paying these guys waaaaay too much. This stops here, NOW!"

  2. yep by User+956 · · Score: 0

    Radio Shack E-Fires 400 workers

    ouch.. I predict someone's going to use real fire on their building.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:yep by deadhammer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well it all depends. How many employees left their red Swingline staplers in their stores before they were locked out?

      --
      I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
    2. Re:yep by saskboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Being fired through a form letter, or email must be soul destroying.

      Now those employees can sue Radio Shack, because they can claim that every time they hear a "new email sound", they break down into tears. They won't be able to find a job working with computers.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:yep by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Funny

      They won't be able to find a job working with computers.

      These are Radio Shack people. They don't know anything about computers anyway.


      ...Although, yeah, I do kinda feel sorry for them when they get laid off like that.

    4. Re:yep by b0r1s · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Being fired through a form letter, or email must be soul destroying.


      I thought about this for a few minutes, and I think I disagree. It must be very clear to everyone involved that these were very significant budget issues, not related to talent or skill. The only depressing part would be admitting that you were dumb enough to work for them in the first place. It seems to me that such a firing would be less painful than a direct "You're too dumb to be employed" conversation, or a "We gave you a chance, and you didn't live up to expectionations" letter.

      They got screwed. It sucks. But at least it's nothing personal.
      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    5. Re:yep by Baricom · · Score: 5, Informative

      I also disagree with this being "soul-destroying," but for a slightly different reason. It could have been a lot worse - TFA says that there were multiple face-to-face meetings prior to the announcement, with an opportunity for employees to ask questions. There was also a severance package. It wasn't the best way to approach the problem, but at least it wasn't unexpected.

    6. Re:yep by hastati · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The idea that your not even worth a face to face firing, would be devasating to most people. I don't see how it could be worse.

      Who ever did the e-firing, didn't do there job. Or at least avoided the hard part of it. If you're going to fire some one. If you're going to tell them they aren't needed anymore. It would have been decent to tell them in person.

      Anyone who thinks this is no big deal, was either never fired or didn't like the job they were fired from. You also can't assume the ones being fired don't care, or don't like there job. Everyone deserves to be fired by a person, no matter how much prior notice they were giving. You don't KNOW you are fired, until you are fired.

      Those endorsing this problaly want to use it in the future, because they don't have the cojones to fire someone in person.

    7. Re:yep by Baricom · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Anyone who thinks this is no big deal, was either never fired or didn't like the job they were fired from.

      Not at all. If I'm ever in the position where I need to fire somebody, I would definitely do so in person.

      I know this is a huge deal for the people involved, and I'm not excusing Radio Shack's actions; I'm saying that there could have been far, far worse mistakes than the one they made.

      I don't see anybody endorsing this course of action; I know I'm not. I just think this is not the worst possible outcome. Employees could have not been given any warning; they could have been fired without a severance package, instead of up to nine months of free pay; or they could have been escorted off the premises by security instead of a manager. Radio Shack's blunder seems mild compared to what others have done.
    8. Re:yep by legoburner · · Score: 1
      Being fired through a form letter, or email must be soul destroying.

      Probably beats firing by text-message though.
    9. Re:yep by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I didn't mind when I got fired from a dollar store, on the phone no less, and they didn't even have the balls to tell me I was fired, just that I didn't get any hours that week. I only didn't mind because I hated that job. . . and that I got a job a few months later that pays more than twice what my boss was making. I also got a good laugh when I learned 2 months later that ex-boss got fired for being a dipshit.

      If it had been a decent job (even Radio Shed would have been a better job) I probably would have been a little more upset with that kind of firing. Had I been fired by a company form letter (which I normally filter to my delete folders anyway) it would have been much more embarassing when I showed up for my next shift not even having read the letter. . .

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    10. Re:yep by PalmerEldritch42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While it is certainly wrong to e-fire someone, a company I once worked for did one worse. The company got bought out and the new owners started downsizing. I worked in IT, specifically, I was in charge of the user accounts for the network, email, etc. I would get a list of accounts to disable every so often, sometimes with a note saying it was urgent and they needed to be deleted NOW. So I deleted them. Within 10 minutes, my phone was ringing off the hook with people complaining that they couldn't get to their email. They had not been told that they were fired, and I had to let them in on the secret.

      When I then started complaining to the asshats in management about that, they informed me that they had sent the people emails about their impending loss of a job. I later found out that this email was sent about 5 minutes before they told me to delete it, thus none of them had actually received the email.

      I was later fired as well, though I was pretty happy about the situation since I got a sweet severence.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.

      :wq!

    11. Re:yep by mzwaterski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a picky note, you didn't really have to tell them they were fired. You could have told them you were looking into the problem and that they should contact their manager.

    12. Re:yep by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      They got screwed. It sucks. But at least it's nothing personal.

      That doesn't help you feel any better though. You're still left with a feeling of failure. In my case, the parent company shut the entire company down. Fortunately, I had only just started, and had plenty of good things on my resume (and current). Others haven't been so fortunte.

    13. Re:yep by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Exactly - it could've been much worse.

      One of my friends dumped his girlfriend of over two years last week - by fax, no less.

      He's being cremated tomorrow.

    14. Re:yep by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I was later fired as well"

      Let me guess... they gave you a list of accounts to disable, and your name was on it?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    15. Re:yep by Pdj79 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being the product of a recent major layoff, I can definitely add some thoughts to this. Had my employer of 8 years taking the b*tch way out and sent me an email letting me know I was one of the unfortunates who was being let go, I more than likely would have been angry and beligerant about the whole affair. Sure, they had meetings discussing their intentions, but still, its demeaning to have a souless company further prove that point by issuing a sterile, cold email letting you know that your life has just been flushed down the toilet. And yes, the severance is a nice gesture, but I'm gonna tell you right now...I got 27-weeks worth of severance when I was let go and while it is a nice chunk of change...it bites you in the a$$ in the long run as you're taxed higher for the lump amount, leaving me with $12,000 of my $19,000 severance. While this isn't the worst thing to do to someone, it still would be demoralizing to know you were the recipient of a form email that took someone 3 minutes to type and no emotion whatsoever. At least with my layoff my boss was there and I watched the man break down in tears. No matter what the circumstances, someone being let go needs compassion and encouragement...sending a "get out" email doesn't do the trick.

    16. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working for any publicly-traded company is soul-destroying.

    17. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "even Radio Shed would have been a better job"

      Round these parts, the name is Radio Crap.

    18. Re:yep by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Although, yeah, I do kinda feel sorry for them when they get laid off like that."

      Well, while getting the axe is tough, I really fail to see what difference it makes in how your told.

      Most people at one time or another, I guess, have been laid off/downsized/fired at some point in their career. It is something that is never easy to hear, but, really I don't think it would matter to me if it was by email, phone or in person. Actually, I'd almost think it would be easier to get by email...that way you don't have to sit there feeling weird in front of the person telling you your services are no longer needed.

      I sure as hell know it is easier to give bad news of other kinds by phone or email rather than in person.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:yep by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "...but still, its demeaning to have a souless company further prove that point by issuing a sterile, cold email letting you know that your life has just been flushed down the toilet."

      I'd made a post earlier that I really didn't see the big deal of being let go by email. I actually thought it would be a bit easier in that you didn't have to sit there and feel uncomfortable in front of a person having to tell you in person. I just didn't get it, but, then I read your post and maybe I do. The part where you liken losing your job of 8 years to having your life 'flushed down the toilet'. Wow...I've just guessed I never associated my work/job with my life or self worth before as it seems you may do. I guess there are a good many of people out there that associate their job with their self worth or image. That's just foreign to me.

      Don't get me wrong, I like my job...I'm often passionate about my interest in what I do, that happens to also earn me a living...a good one. But, it is just a job. Where I do it, and who for really isn't the biggest deal in my life. The second I leave work...I completely leave it (unless on call or something). I don't really think about it till I walk back in the door the next day. I don't have any loyalty really towards any company, because I feel in this age, they have none towards me. But, I've felt that for a long time. Currently, I'm in a semi-contract mode...W2 hourly employee for a contract company. Work is good, pay is good, benefits are good. I'm friends with the owner of the company and often have drinks with him. I'm a good employee and contribute to the company. But, if I got the ax tomorrow...and it could happen as that the area I'm in is New Orleans...well, I'd take a little hit on my pride, but, mostly just worry about getting the next gig.

      But, losing my job, doesn't really mean I lost something that defines me. I work ONLY to make money...to enable me to buy and do things that make me happy. If I won the lottery tomorrow, trust me..I'd never work again, I'd do nothing but stuff that was fun.

      I guess that explains a lot of the posts I read here...I was actually shocked that so many people described the firing process so emotionally...and took it so personally. I didn't realize that the job people hold defines them so much. And I think that is sad.

      A job should be nothing more than a means to supporting your lifestyle. Sure...hopefully you can enjoy your work, but, really...does it matter who you do it for? Your job should not be YOU.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:yep by Pdj79 · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I understand your position. There was a time several years ago where I felt just as you do now. Work was work and that was all it was. I clock in, life turns off and work turns on. Clock out, the same in reverse. What changed was I became an asset to the area I worked in. I created several programs and systems that made life easier for my co-workers and increased our productivity by 85%. I made a decent living and, with the birth of my 2 beautiful children, felt that I was untouchable. But that is where hurt comes in. I was told time and time again how valuable I was to the company, I've rubbed shoulders with all the higher ups (and had even managed to become good friends with the senior vice president of my division), and when the talks of layoffs began, I was reassured 5 times that my job would not be affected. So the emotion and pain that came with my separation was justified. I became my job and my job became my life. Having it taken away is a horrible feeling. Sure, I will find another job. Sure, I'll make money. But the security of being with an employer for years, the comfort in being loyal and having the company reciprocate, and the ease-of-mind in knowing I have a paycheck is now gone. The trust of any company has been seriously tainted, and I will probably be scarred for the rest of my life because of this. Sure, its not debilitating, but it will haunt me. Now I know just how expendable I truly am in the corporate world.

    21. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?? I don't get it.

    22. Re:yep by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because if I got laid off in person I would be escorted off site and handed my keys in. With an e-mail like that I'd likely take the inventory with me. Seing that the whole store was likely closed no-one else is being paid to care.

      (while I kid I do know someone who was fired over the phone because the DM was a chicken shit. $10-15K in high end camera gear dissapeared overnight).

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    23. Re:yep by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      "A job should be nothing more than a means to supporting your lifestyle. Sure...hopefully you can enjoy your work, but, really...does it matter who you do it for? Your job should not be YOU."

      You don't have kids eh?
      The moment you have a family depending on you the "just a job" bit takes on a whole new meaning. We're a family of 4 on a single income in north/central california. I barely make enough with the cost of living. If I lost my job then I would be hard pressed to continue to put my spouse through school, she would likely have to drop out and enter the workforce early.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    24. Re:yep by MrFebtober · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha, fax!? That's hilari...er..uh...cremated? Is one of those sentences a punchline?

    25. Re:yep by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...when the talks of layoffs began, I was reassured 5 times that my job would not be affected. So the emotion and pain that came with my separation was justified...But the security of being with an employer for years, the comfort in being loyal and having the company reciprocate, and the ease-of-mind in knowing I have a paycheck is now gone."

      Hey, I hear ya. I guess I used to feel that way. But, it dawned on me quite a few years ago, that the age of employment for life, reciprocal loyalty between employer and employee....is gone, and has been gone for longer than most people think. With the rare exceptions, the bottom line today is $$, nothing more, nothing less. It is all business out there, and you have to think in that line, because that is they way the companies do it. These reasons are what made me look seriously into contracting. I incorporated myself...get the tax breaks that go with it...and am more free than before. Sure, it takes a bit more work on your part for finances, but, you are on more of an equal footing with companies...business to business. You don' t get lulled into thinking the old way like you described. You work a job, you leave, it is all business.

      Now, nothing says you can't still take the same pride in your work, you can still enjoy it..make friends, etc, but, don't get stuck. You don't even have a chance to get hurt that way. You mentioned having a couple of 'anchors' now (kids), well, that is gonna make it a little tougher, but, do look into the life. You can make great $$'s, but, you often do have to be a bit more willing to travel to where the work is. Unfortunately, with the job situation out there, you may need to adapt to this...it would at least keep you from moving the whole family around all the time. But, I think in this day in age, you cannot begin to think of any direct employment as a steady job where you are 'valued'.

      If you're gonna have the same job security of a contractor, you might as well get the same money for it....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    26. Re:yep by accelleron · · Score: 1

      Easier to give bad news, but [though ultimately pointless] it is still somewhat more palatable to recieve them in person.
      It creates a sense of decency/regret, if anything a faux 'shoulder to cry on.'
      Not that us cheerful robots need shoulders or cry or anything...

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    27. Re:yep by arabung · · Score: 1

      I think it would destroy my soul to work there.

    28. Re:yep by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "The moment you have a family depending on you the "just a job" bit takes on a whole new meaning. We're a family of 4 on a single income in north/central california. I barely make enough with the cost of living. If I lost my job then I would be hard pressed to continue to put my spouse through school, she would likely have to drop out and enter the workforce early."

      While I sympathize with you...I'd have to suggest that you all didn't plan very well for those kids, did you? You should have money put back to fall back on...I call it my "fuck you" money. Why did you not work and save a bit to fall back on before having kids? With proper planning, you could have the money saved to put the wife through school, etc. Why are you living in CA? You could move somewhere else where your income would buy you more...

      I'm not trying to be callous, but, people do get themselves into fixes...and they have to deal with it. If you have kids, you need to plan for them, and make sacrifices for them if you have them. Maybe your wife will have to drop out of school for awhile, sad, but, hey, if you'd not had kids till after she was out, you might not be in that fix. There are things you could do...but, you gotta research what's out there, and make the effort.

      My comments earlier really were made more in the direction of people being emotionally tied to their jobs....not so much financially tied to their jobs. But, with the kid thing, yep, it is tough....but, people should do planning before having them. I mean, you check your finances and budget before buying a new car don't you? You save for a house don't you? Why should you not do the same thing for kids, those are bare min. 18+ year investments!!! It is like credit card debt...if you get into it without thinking...you gotta do what it takes to make it up and get out of it.

      You may indeed have to consider moving to where you can afford more, and indeed your wife may have to drop out of school till you catch up. Tough, but, it can be done. Either way, I'd not ever consider my employment at a company anything more than temporary, you can be let go at the drop of a hat.

      Good Luck to you!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    29. Re:yep by UncleMidriff · · Score: 1

      I haven't been at my current job (my first out of college) for very long, but I still think being fired would be hard. I wouldn't go jump off a bridge because of it, but I would be a little upset. Such a large chunk of the average working person's life is spent on the job that I don't see how it's possible not to be be at least somewhat defined by the job. Also, at least in my situation, I've formed relationships with the people I work with. Sure, they're not deep relationships, but they're still a meaningful part of my life that I enjoy. Being told that I was no longer allowed to come back to work and hang out with these people would make me sad. That said, I don't think being told in person that I was being let go would be any easier than getting an email about it. I'd be upset either way.

    30. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      high school?

    31. Re:yep by joekampf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've heard stories where they having something like a fire drill or a company meeting, to get people away from their desks. While outside, the IT departement is busy revoking access. Then they call out the people who get fired/laid off and escort them to their desks to get their belongings.

      --
      When a man lies he murders a part of the world.
    32. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A job should be nothing more than a means to supporting your lifestyle. Sure...hopefully you can enjoy your work, but, really...does it matter who you do it for? Your job should not be YOU."

      My job isn't me, but my job is my lifestyle. Just out of college and I work 80hrs or so a week(hourly thank Steve!), and I really just getup goto work come home check /. surf around install linux on something for fun, then go back to work. I live to work and I work to live basicly, if I was fired via email it would tick me off quite a bit.

    33. Re:yep by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It makes a big difference to hear it in person, I think.

      When I was laid off by Unisys back in 1992 after working for them for almost five years, it helped cushion the blow to see how hard my manager (who is the one who told me) was taking it all. He was told from above to let three of our four-person programming team go that same day - our side of the Airline Center ended up laying off 20% of the staff all told - and it really shook him up, even though we all knew for months that it was coming.

      When I was laid off by Northwest Airlines in January 2002 after eight years, hearing the news from my director also helped, since he was obviously not happy that the layoff was occurring, and again that helped a little to cushion the blow (and I needed it that time, since that was a layoff I *didn't* see coming since I'd survived the mass layoffs after September 11th. We thought they were done).

      An e-mail message telling you you've been let go is impersonal as hell. I'd really be angry about something like that. Hearing it in person shows a little bit of class on the part of the organization, at least IMO.

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    34. Re:yep by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      I have only been laid off once. Every other time I either quit with two weeks notice, or reached the end of a fixed-length contract. I didn't see it coming, but the boss did tell me in person and did explain why -- I was a very good worker, but business wasn't doing well. The most recent hire had to go, and that was me. Of course a month or two later my boss got fired for mismanaging, cooking the books, etc. by the owner of the business, and they could afford more workers.

      Anyway, I think the personal approach is best. If I ever got laid off and it wasn't my immediate supervisor, team lead, etc, telling me face to face, I'd be pissed. I can't say I'd be Mr. Milton and burn down the building, but I would definitely discourage friends from working there.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    35. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rtfa, fucktard. These are corporate whores, not bozos at the stores.

    36. Re:yep by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Don't get me wrong, I like my job...I'm often passionate about my interest in what I do, that happens to also earn me a living...a good one. But, it is just a job. Where I do it, and who for really isn't the biggest deal in my life.

      Some of us aren't like that. I chose to work for Northwest Airlines, for example, because I had a few years of previous exposure to the airline industry and I wanted to work as a programmer FOR A MAJOR AIRLINE. Period. And while I worked there, I wasn't just a programmer, applications, one each. I was an applications programmer in the heart of their flight operations group. If my code failed, the airline didn't fly. Literally. And it felt good to feel like the stuff I was doing was a critical part of the actual operation.

      Northwest was a company I felt very strongly about. I loved working there, and I'm still proud to know that I have something like 100,000 lines of code still running in their WorldFlight production system and handling a large percentage of their ACARS and surface weather traffic, as well as doing various other things. But it hurt me quite a bit personally when I was laid off because I'd invested over a decade of time (between contractor time and employee time) in that system, and I was really proud to be part of that particular group.

      It hurt to leave, but I'm glad I was there. I do like where I am now, and I'm proud of what I do, but it's not the same.

      But, losing my job, doesn't really mean I lost something that defines me. I work ONLY to make money...to enable me to buy and do things that make me happy. If I won the lottery tomorrow, trust me..I'd never work again, I'd do nothing but stuff that was fun.

      I want to create software that actually MEANS something. I like working on projects that will have a real impact on some aspect of the company, and I sometimes put a lot of time and emotional energy into the designs I create.

      Coding is a means to an end, certainly, but for me it's also an end in itself. The problem solving and design aspects are satisfying IN THEMSELVES for me, and I'm actually quite proud of some of the things that I've been able to accomplish so far in my short 18-year career as a programmer.

      When I was at NWA, I would still be working there even if I had won the lottery. Why? Because that was a working and technical environment that I very much enjoyed being a part of, and solving problems in that context was a fun activity in its own right. I *WANTED* to go to work every day.

      I guess that explains a lot of the posts I read here...I was actually shocked that so many people described the firing process so emotionally...and took it so personally. I didn't realize that the job people hold defines them so much. And I think that is sad.

      I believe that programming is art at a certain level, and I believe there is nothing wrong with an artist feeling some form of emotion over the works he creates.

      If you don't get the kind of satisfaction that I do after coming up with a particularly elegant fix for a problem or a particularly efficient design, then I feel sorry for you because I think you are missing out on one of the really neat things about being a programmer. Our profession is to weave webs of logic and structure out of nothing! I think the whole virtual world of computing is an amazing thing, even magical in a way.

      A job should be nothing more than a means to supporting your lifestyle. Sure...hopefully you can enjoy your work, but, really...does it matter who you do it for? Your job should not be YOU.
      I agree that your job should not be you, but I don't have a problem with people who are willing to put some of their heart and soul into their work. It's one of the things which differentiates good software from great software, I think. For some people, passion is important. I was just going through the motions here, I'd be ready to find a different career. Instead, I'm doing what I love: writing software. I hope I'm able to do it for another 18 years, and hopefully until I retire...
      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    37. Re:yep by Locarius · · Score: 1

      It is a lot more emotional for those who don't have the skillset or contact network to find new work. For the confident employee that knows he has what it takes to be successful, it is a time of opportunity, not crisis.

    38. Re:yep by slashdotet · · Score: 1

      I was recently laid off by a great employer and they told us face to face. I lied the job and I was really more sad about not seeing the people I worked with than anything else. We got a face to face meeting and If i have the chance I would work for them again. Now if I had been laid off via txt or email I wouldn't work for them or continue to tell people how great there products are. Theres a lot to be said for having the guts to tell someone face-to-face they are laid off and it goes a long way to help the person feel better about them self and there old job.

      --
      ~ Diagonally Parked in a Parallel Universe ~
    39. Re:yep by Iberian · · Score: 1

      Equally sad is you define happiness by having money to buy and do things...

    40. Re:yep by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      That's a little non-sequitor. Was it a breakup letter or a suicide note?

      --
      Fnord.
    41. Re:yep by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      The idea that your not even worth a face to face firing, would be devasating to most people.


      Why? Are people's emotions that fragile these days? Has PC made them so flimsy that a grown adult can't handle these things? Granted, getting an email out of the blue firing you would be a shock, but so would being called into an office and fired out of the blue. If there was any hint these cuts were coming, I don't see the problem. It's no different than a "pink slip."

    42. Re:yep by Dmala · · Score: 1

      Had I been fired by a company form letter (which I normally filter to my delete folders anyway) it would have been much more embarassing when I showed up for my next shift not even having read the letter. . .

      Well, you'd be OK until they "fix the glitch".

    43. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My DM usually just kills off your character and tears up the character sheet in front of you.

    44. Re:yep by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      You save for a house don't you? Why should you not do the same thing for kids, those are bare min. 18+ year investments!!! It is like credit card debt...if you get into it without thinking...you gotta do what it takes to make it up and get out of it.

      A few minor issues with this:

      1. If people "invested" in their kids only so long as it was financially sensible we would be extinct as a species - rarely do kids pay back their parents on a financial level (unless you're in a 3rd-world kids-live-with-parents system).

      2. Recently my wife and I broke down and bought a moderately-priced video camera (we're talking $300 here). Technically it might not be the best time for us to spend discretionarily, but if we waited until we have $100k in the bank the kids would be grown up, and then what would be the point? The same applies in many cases - most people with kids do not have a ton of spare cash until they are old - a time when they least need the cash. Going into debt allows people to spend money while they are young. In some sense it makes sense to target savings/debt so that you are in the maximum amount of debt possible at death.

      3. Kids are a non-refundable investment. If somebody overspends on a car, they can at least get 80% of it back by turning around and selling it - or they can just stop making payments and the lender takes care of the details. You can't just return your kids to the store if your life takes a turn for the worse job-wise.

      I do agree with you that people do need to plan for kids, but having 6-12 months of salary just sitting in the back "just in case" is a difficult savings goal. Many couples will not have the ability to save that much until a fairly late age, and starting late with having kids introduces a whole bunch of other issues that aren't great for families.

      Don't get me wrong - I see your point and actually used to be an advocate of it myself. I am probably on the fence even today. However, despite having finances in pretty good order I found it difficult to raise kids - especially on a single income. There are all kinds of expenses that can come up, and the more you have the more you tend to spend on them.

    45. Re:yep by omeomi · · Score: 1

      One of my friends dumped his girlfriend of over two years last week - by fax, no less. This gets to the heart of the problem. There are certain things that our culture dictates are done in person, if at all possible. Firing and Breaking up with someone are two of them. For whatever reason, it's expected that this is done, so something like an email or fax is hurtful to those involved because it's akin to saying "you're not important enough to do this in person"...

    46. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You're a dick. The emotional issue isn't just tied to your job being your "life." But for most of us, our jobs enable us to support our lives. And those who live with us. An unexpected (or even expected) job loss can be a devastating blow on not only your self esteem, but on your ability to do things like pay your rent, feed your family, or keep your baby warm. From experience, the impact losing your job has on you may not be apparent until it's actually gone. The arrogance in your letter indicates to me that you've clearly never had to make the kind of tough financial decisions that sometimes are required when you run out of finances.

    47. Re:yep by gamlidek · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure there's just no good way to get told you've lost your job. But I know there are a lot of bad ways. Impersonal and treated like a cog? Yep, this is one of them.

      I'm reminded of the scene in Fifth Element when the old Chinese guy reads our hero's message:

      (from IMDB)

      Mr. Kim: You got a message.
      Korben Dallas: Yeah
      Mr. Kim: You're not gonna open it? It might be important.
      Korben Dallas: Yeah, like the last two I got were important. The first one was from my wife, telling me she was leaving. The second was from my lawyer, telling me he was leaving... with my wife.
      Mr. Kim: Ah, that's bad luck. Grandfather say it not rain everyday. This is good news, guaranteed. I bet your lunch.
      Korben Dallas: Okay, you're on.
      Mr. Kim: Come on...

      [Reads]

      Mr. Kim: You are fired! Oh.

      -gam

      --
      "In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice, they are not."
    48. Re:yep by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      at which point I'd just have to burn the place down.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    49. Re:yep by eepok · · Score: 1

      "A job should be nothing more than a means to supporting your lifestyle. Sure...hopefully you can enjoy your work, but, really...does it matter who you do it for? Your job should not be YOU."

      This is a completely personal opinion. A lot of us follow the philosophy that if you're going to be working for 1/3 of your day, you should be doing something you love. Something that gives purpose and value to that 1/3 of your day. (For me, it's education).

      When you lose what you love, what is giving actual purpose in your life, you lose your soul. You feel empty. You can lose a million or lose a hundred but if you lose what you put value in, then you have nothing.

      Even worse, when you get such a impersonal lay off notice, you are devalued. If you got this email, then the powers that be did not see your work, your life, your intelligence, nor the well-being of your family worth the 45 minutes of pay it would have taken to tell you in person.

      I hope that someday soon the people who made the decision to use email to lay people off feel not just regret, but shame, TRUE shame, for what they did.

    50. Re:yep by TheGreek · · Score: 1
      Believe me, I understand your position. There was a time several years ago where I felt just as you do now. Work was work and that was all it was. I clock in, life turns off and work turns on. Clock out, the same in reverse. What changed was I became an asset to the area I worked in. I created several programs and systems that made life easier for my co-workers and increased our productivity by 85%. I made a decent living and, with the birth of my 2 beautiful children, felt that I was untouchable. But that is where hurt comes in. I was told time and time again how valuable I was to the company, I've rubbed shoulders with all the higher ups (and had even managed to become good friends with the senior vice president of my division), and when the talks of layoffs began, I was reassured 5 times that my job would not be affected. So the emotion and pain that came with my separation was justified. I became my job and my job became my life. Having it taken away is a horrible feeling. Sure, I will find another job. Sure, I'll make money. But the security of being with an employer for years, the comfort in being loyal and having the company reciprocate, and the ease-of-mind in knowing I have a paycheck is now gone. The trust of any company has been seriously tainted, and I will probably be scarred for the rest of my life because of this. Sure, its not debilitating, but it will haunt me. Now I know just how expendable I truly am in the corporate world.
      Believe me, I understand your position. There was a time several years ago where I felt just as you do now. An employee was an employee and that was all it was. He clocked in, life turned off and work turned on. Clock out, the same in reverse. What changed was he became asset to the area he worked in. He created several programs and systems that made life easier for his co-workers and increased our productivity by 85%. We increased revenue substantially, and, with the addition of two new clients, thought that we were untouchable. But that is where hurt comes in. We were told time and time again how valuable the Company was to him. He's rubbed shoulders with all the higher ups (and had even managed to become good friends with the senior vice president of his division), and when the job market started heating up, he reassured us five times that he wasn't interested in another job elsewhere. So the emotion and pain that came with his separation was justified. The Company became him, and he became the Company. Having him taken away is a horrible feeling. Sure, we'll find a replacement. Sure, we'll still have customers. But the security of being with an employee for years, the comfort in being loyal and having the employee reciprocate, and the ease-of-mind in knowing we have a dependable employee is now gone. The trust of any employee has been seriously tainted, and we will probably be scarred for the rest of our existence because of this. Sure, its not debilitating, but it will haunt us. Now we know just how expendable the Company truly is in the corporate world.
    51. Re:yep by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      These are Radio Shack people. They don't know anything about computers anyway.
      What's the famous paraphrasing of their tagline? ah yes:

      "You've got questions, we've got cellphones."
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    52. Re:yep by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That seems to be the standard way of firing somebody from a job such as you describe. Don't fire them, just reduce their hours down to 0, or 1 shift a week. They will eventually leave. It's not like most people would stick around. Unless it specifically says in your contract you will get x hours, then they don't have to give them to you. I think the problem is, is that workers rights and unions often make it way to hard for the company to fire you, so they get around it by making you want to quit.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    53. Re:yep by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Errr... yes. The inferred joke was that she didn't take it too well, and killed him. Perhaps a little too subtle for the Slashdot crowd.

      He did actually break up with her by fax though.

    54. Re:yep by msobkow · · Score: 1


      If you were in Canada, they gave you zero hours so you'd quit.


      If you quit, they don't have to pay severance. If they fire you or lay you off, they have to pay severance.


      The "zero hour" tactic is very, very common in retail and food services industries.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    55. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "even Radio Shed would have been a better job"

      Round these parts, the name is Radio Crap.


      Rackety Shack in my little neck o' the woods...

    56. Re:yep by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      I didn't quit though, they just stopped scheduling me and didn't pay me severance. I don't mind though, I wouldn't take their money after that anyway.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    57. Re:yep by Millenniumman · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You've got questions, we've got blank stares."

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    58. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel sorry for them....Heck NO! All the RS employees here in my town are a bunch of freakin
      losers. The manager here is an illegal alien. Here from Australia! And he's over 50! Now if you are over 50, just you TRY to go to Australia in any other way than as a tourist or a Zimbabwean
      white refugee. You won't. Australia treats immigrants like used tires, not enough tread left
      and they don't want you. I should complain the INS about that illegal Aussie, but fat chance
      of them listening. They might though, the Aussie is white, male, and Protestant; and that makes
      him fair game for discrimination as opposed to being black, non-english speaking, have a criminal
      record, and infected with loathesome venereal diseases.

    59. Re:yep by kimvette · · Score: 1
      Wonder where you got that quip from. . . oh right, it was my signature (word for word) for several weeks. ;)

      ANYWAY, on a related note:

      Employees were given 30 minutes to clean out their desks and leave the building. Employees were informed that if they had questions, they would be allowed to send their questions in e-mail. (from the wikipedia article)


      I guess it's now:

      "You've got questions? Send us an email instead. Better yet, don't bother asking us."
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    60. Re:yep by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Now LexisNexus looks at the big picture (as does Citicorp, or group or WTF they go by now). They call everyone away into a public area or conference area and tell them at the same time that everyone's being laid off --- but it's an incomplete sentence they use. If complete, they would say everyone's being laid off and their jobs are being offshored....

    61. Re:yep by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I did read that on a /. signature, but I didn't know whose. Since I used your intellectual property, I'll give you all the karma I earned.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    62. Re:yep by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      I was actually shocked that so many people described the firing process so emotionally...and took it so personally.
      It's human nature. Being fired is an implied indictment on your abilities and naturally people take that personally. People are also often adverse to change (especially change forced on them) and uncertainty. And if you've got a family and financial obligations it can be a major problem, one that from your point of view has been inflicted on you for little or no reason.
    63. Re:yep by sbmke · · Score: 1

      Radio Shack - you've got questions, we just want your phone number

    64. Re:yep by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Equally sad is you define happiness by having money to buy and do things..."

      Why is that sad? If it makes me happy?

      How would you better define happiness?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. The real story by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Radio Shack employees make 90,000 dollars a year for standing around like idiots, not having a clue, and pestering people for their home addresses?

    Why did you Radio Shack slashbots keep this a secret from us??

    1. Re:The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA jobs were at their HQ.

    2. Re:The real story by JeffSh · · Score: 2, Informative

      ehhh you're quite daft for making that statement. the article clearly notes that these are employees mostly at their headquarters, which indicates they are probably mid level executives or IT staff or something like that.. not store personnel.

      im sure people who work in stores make $7-8 an hour like most other retail workers.

    3. Re:The real story by Mortanius · · Score: 4, Informative

      At least in CT, sales people on the floor make $7-$8 per hour base (excluding bonuses), with higher tiers (managers-in-training, asst. managers, managers, etc.) obviously making higher bases and different sets of bonuses. No floor salesperson has their own radioshack email address, only a store-wide email account.

      And no, they don't ask for home address anymore, only your zip code for marketing / store stock purposes, which you can decline with no argument. Addresses -are- needed in some situations though, for things like service plans and Answers Plus (in-store credit card) accounts though.

    4. Re:The real story by rmallico · · Score: 2

      Worked a Radio Shack in Oregon 3 winters in a row during my off-season... worked on commission + minimum wage... cleared about 4k a month for 3 months then went back to my job in febrary... the manager (this was in 1988-1991) made between 50-75k a year...

      --
      sig goes here!
    5. Re:The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at Radio Shack for a couple months, they pay minumum + a shitty comission structure. You get a tiny percentage of your sales *if* you make over a certain amount of sales that day, and some items (cell phones, of course..) give you up to an extra $20-25.

    6. Re:The real story by sporkme · · Score: 1

      In a Radio Shack when I was there, if you made under $9/hr, either you were slow or your store was. Some folks made as much as $30/hr or even more when cell phone sales were up. Being the only one that could sell parts was worth $1/hr. As a manager, I was looking at $55K/yr for my first year. I think the emphasis has changed from commission since, so you're probably on the right track, though I bet they average about $9.50/hr.

    7. Re:The real story by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      Are you one of those guys who look lost when i walk in and ask for a BNC conector or cracks up when i ask for a rectifier for my Johnson........ outbord motor?
      \
      Being the late 80's, I think you probably knew what this stuff is. Most radio shack employies i come across now think the radio stands for cell phone or remote controled cars. I was looking for a metal-oxide varistor a few months ago and the sales boy asked if i could use one made from plastic becuase most thier resistors are plastic. Well thats what they looked like to him, he admited.

      There probably is a reason radio shack is restructuring and fireing some people.

    8. Re:The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other part of the story was three months ago when Radio Shack publicly stated they were closing about 30% of their stores.

      In essence, store clerks unlucky enough to be assigned to underperforming locations were the first to feel the long knives although I would image there was at least some shuffling to fill in for natural attrition. Same applies to managers I would well assume. That corporate cutting came later would be the expected flow, although sometimes corporate gets the gullitine first.

      No surprise then although no one looks forward to job elimination. Unfortunately this is the continuation of a growing trend.

      But did not Radio Shack Corporate bring this upon themselves?

      Clearly the early mainstay of the business, hobby electronics, was flagging in the classic regard but was increasing in parallel areas. Less descrete components and integrated circuits were being sold but areas such as car stereo parts was ramping up big time for example. Radio Shack failed to indentify and capitalize on the shifting trends opting to become just another consumer electronics retailer and a rather poor one at that.

      That the average hobbyist was no longer building around 741 op amps didn't mean the hobbyist was going away, rather, they were simply changing venues. In the Radio Shacks around here you cannot buy speakers, enclosures, crossovers and all the rest. RS used to be a good source for this and now that every kid on the block is spending megadollars to amp out the stereo in their hoopty, where is the neighborhood Radio Shack?

      By the same token there is a large market of people looking to Mod their computers. Again, where is Radio Shack? You could build quite a list beyond the two examples I mention, of RS completely missing the boat and it's sad really. RS was not known for top of the line but stuff was readily available and the company enjoyed success due to convenience and accessibility.

      As someone else pointed out, Radio Shack is perhaps best known today as a tier two cellphone store but that market is saturated and highly competitive with corrosponding declines in profit margins. The halcyon days of cell phone companies as high margin revenue generators is over for now it's all about volume. Cell phone sales will not save the company and they cannot compete with Walmart, BestBuy, Comp USA and Fry's etc. Least wise not directly but they turned their back on the "do it your self" crowd and that was their market at one time.

      So Radio Shack fades into the sunset?

      Put it this way. If the company has what it takes to dig themselves out of this hole, they should have had what it takes to not dig such a hole in the first place. They didn't and I doubt it.

    9. Re:The real story by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      As someone else pointed out, Radio Shack is perhaps best known today as a tier two cellphone store but that market is saturated and highly competitive with corrosponding declines in profit margins. The halcyon days of cell phone companies as high margin revenue generators is over for now it's all about volume. Cell phone sales will not save the company and they cannot compete with Walmart, BestBuy, Comp USA and Fry's etc. Least wise not directly but they turned their back on the "do it your self" crowd and that was their market at one time.


      Compete? I haven't seen different deals from anywhere. If you go to BestBuy for a phone, you get the same offer that you can get from a mall kiosk. In fact, the mall kiosk might be the better of the two because they'll throw in a free "something" (miscellaneous crap that you apply to your phone to make it look "cool"). Your best bet is buying the phone from like e-Bay or something (just watch out for scammers).

      Layne
    10. Re:The real story by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like some beancounter figured out that cell phones were more profitable per unit than anything else they were selling, so they decided to focus all efforts on being a cellphone store. What they didn't study was the sustainability of that market amidst all the competition. As the parent poster said, they had no vision for the future at all. Just look at most of their stores; they're a time warp. The beancounters will manage them straight into liquidation as the cellphone margins continue to decrease.

    11. Re:The real story by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "If you go to BestBuy for a phone, you get the same offer that you can get from a mall kiosk. In fact, the mall kiosk might be the better of the two because they'll throw in a free "something" (miscellaneous crap that you apply to your phone to make it look "cool")."

      Hmm...I find the opposite to be true. I've always bought my phones at Best Buy or CompUSA. I wait till they have a cell I want on sale. Heck this last time, they had a screw up at CompUSA, and I got a brand new Samsung Blade phone (in JAN) when they were first coming out,and got it for about $50. My new plan was much better than my old one...and I'm happy.

      The real deal was the phone for $100 after discounts and rebates. I never saw that good a deal at the SprintPCS stores online, or kiosk.

      I find that if you check the Sunday ads for BB or CU or CC even...if you wait, you can find your phone often for a much better deal than directly from the company.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:The real story by rmallico · · Score: 1

      are you one of those guys who look lost all the time? what kind of question is that? i framed the time (88-91) and you suddenly are in 2006... hellloooooo... mc sumdumass... i NEVER said there was any reason... where the #@%!#%@# did you get that idea... I was responding to the person talking about them getting minimum wage mc dumass... RTFA and please, follow the bouncing ball and try not to read these out loud... its only confusing the other kids in class.. GAWD

      --
      sig goes here!
    13. Re:The real story by azrider · · Score: 1
      Cell phone sales will not save the company and they cannot compete with Walmart, BestBuy, Comp USA and Fry's etc. Least wise not directly but they turned their back on the "do it your self" crowd and that was their market at one time.
      I don't know about other areas, but in the SoCal and AZ markets I would much rather go to Fry's than RS. I can (and do) find anything (including individual transistors and resistors) there.
      --
      And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
      John 8:32(King James Version)
    14. Re:The real story by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      are you one of those guys who look lost all the time? what kind of question is that? i framed the time (88-91) and you suddenly are in 2006... hellloooooo.
      wooosh.. I'm not going to explain what that sound was.

      BTW, I'm temped to think maybe you are one of those cluless guys even after i suggested you wasn't because the time frame you cited was before thier sales asociates started carrying thier IQs in a handbag. I was making a point on how thier sales staff suck now.

      i NEVER said there was any reason... where the #@%!#%@# did you get that idea
      I said there was a reason. I left it to you to figure it out after explaining a situation of a person verry ignorant of the products they are selling.

      I was responding to the person talking about them getting minimum wage
      And I was commenting on you working at radio shack and how they suck now. Now that we have our motives out of the way, I can say i'm starting to see a conection.

      RTFA and please, follow the bouncing ball and try not to read these out loud... its only confusing the other kids in class
      Hmmm.... 'nuff said? Sorry i confused you. I wasn't trying, really! i just figured you would understand. Now I know i was wrong... Meybe i will spell it out in better terms next time? Good day.
    15. Re:The real story by rmallico · · Score: 1

      Meybe you should proof-read your posts... your sig is right on par.. some dumb ass... what a dolt

      --
      sig goes here!
    16. Re:The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no, they don't ask for home address anymore, only your zip code for marketing / store stock purposes, which you can decline with no argument.

      Back in 1996 a radio shack employee in their Boston, Commonwealth Ave store asked me my social security number when I went to buy a battery with cash. Just asking for an address was an improvement.

    17. Re:The real story by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Isn't it amazing how you couldn't even understand a post by sumdumass?

      Proof reading is for people who care. As you might be able to tell, I don't. But as long as your trying to be among the spelling and grammar nazi elite, you might wanna correct some of your posts.

      BTW, as long as we are corecting each other, sumdumass is a user name. Sometimes it is refered to as a moniker. The sig is the thing you place at the end of your post. Most forums have some thing that lets you store the sig and automaticly apply it to a post. You should know this already because your sig say "sig goes here!". In email, the sig is something that attempts to verify the message was sent by a certain person but i think that meaning of the word might get a little complicated for your skill level.

      Well, i hope you are having a good time not understanding things and attempting to correct mistakes you made in previous posts. whats that????? i think your mom is calling you know. Better go check.

    18. Re:The real story by rmallico · · Score: 1

      yur speelling iz mutch bettr

      --
      sig goes here!
    19. Re:The real story by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      thts cuz i used spells checkr.

      anyways, I wasn't trying to be bitter towards you untill your reply.....don't take the first message that way. The rest...:) sure, whatever, mkay?

    20. Re:The real story by rmallico · · Score: 1

      it tiz all copasetic dawg...

      --
      sig goes here!
  4. Wow... by Gemini_25_RB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's get a hand for RadioShack and their PR skills! I've always wondered when things along this line would start to happen. I'm surprised it didn't become popular to fire people by voicemail when that was the "new" thing. Firings can become a very confrontational situation (especially since the messenger didn't always have a hand in the process), so I wonder if the messenger decided that email would be better than hell.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radioshack before Walmart? What is America coming to?!?!!??

    2. Re:Wow... by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've never seen a company fire someone who didn't have a security guard escort them to the desk for thier belongings and then to the the door. In a mass layoff, the company would contact a few employees who weren't getting laid off and ask them to com in early, then meet everyone else at the door and take them in a few at a time. Usualy this is preceeding a form letter issued the previous payday.

      I do know of a guy who was fired at some company (not nameing names) and was left to finish his shift. He wasn't escorted out or monitored and decided to place clear scotch tape over a few dozen opticle sensors on the production line after his shift. This was on friday and it took three weeks to get the production line going again. Every section was registering an obstruction when there wasn't, the computer was replaced two times and you couldn't see the tape on the sensor heads. Eventualy someoen decided to replace everthing on the control and safety circuits and found the causes later. I don't know how much it ended up costing them.

    3. Re:Wow... by JerLasVegas · · Score: 1

      Hey, why can't I login to the system? Because you're fired! lol!

    4. Re:Wow... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      I was in a room once where the previous employee's building entry card simply got deactivated between noon and 1pm. Her keys and wallet were upstairs, but security decided to allow a coworker to retreive them. Other than that it was simply "kthxbye, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out."

    5. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Usualy this is preceeding a form letter issued the previous payday."

      Wait... how does this work? You can't preceed something that is previous without a time machine, last I checked.

    6. Re:Wow... by sporkmonger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was gently encouraged to voluntarily quit my job awhile back. They knew I wanted to quit and they had layoffs coming up, so I guess they thought they'd just asked me quietly if perhaps I wouldn't be happier being self-employed. (Which I am.) Was really quite entertaining. But I gotta say, I thought they were really careless. Facilities managment shut off my security card a week early, which was kinda cute, but everyone kept letting me into the building in the morning anyways, and eventually my manager had them turn it back on. They didn't shut off my various accounts until about a week after I'd left, so Adium kept signing me into Sametime. This confused the heck out of some of the people there who kept asking me various software support questions, and then following them up with, "Wait, didn't you leave the company last week?" And I had full access to pretty much everything I normally had access to for the week or so between tendering my resignation and my last day (which was a lot), and my VPN access didn't go away for almost two weeks after I'd actually left. Of course, I'm a good guy and wasn't even remotely tempted to do anything evil -- I rather enjoyed working there -- but it seems to me that with clients and such, this kind of issue could be a serious legal liability no matter how much you trust the employee.

    7. Re:Wow... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      I got that beat. Employee was told to 'go take lunch while it's quiet'. Came back, tried to log into his computer (account disabled while he was gone, obviously)... "Yeah, about that..."

    8. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew a person who got laid off while they were on a 3 week vacation. His first clue that something was wrong was when the badge reader didn't recognize their badge. His second clue was when they went to security and they were told their name wasn't coming up on the employee database. Security contacted his former manager who came down and gave him the official word that he'd been laid off. Security then escorted him to his desk so he could pick up his personal property.

    9. Re:Wow... by mhayes57 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I once worked for a company that fired many employees without notice on a Monday. The only problem was that they fired one of the system administrators, but forgot he was always one of the first people in the office. He was still able to log on to the system, and as various other fired employees were showing up, he diligently re-activated thier passwords and passkeys. When the "Management" bastards showed up, they had some serious splaining to do...

      This kind of thing and the people that perpetrate it deserve all the ridicule that they get...

    10. Re:Wow... by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      I do know of a guy who was fired at some company (not nameing names) and was left to finish his shift. He wasn't escorted out or monitored and decided to place clear scotch tape over a few dozen opticle sensors on the production line after his shift. This was on friday and it took three weeks to get the production line going again. Every section was registering an obstruction when there wasn't, the computer was replaced two times and you couldn't see the tape on the sensor heads. Eventualy someoen decided to replace everthing on the control and safety circuits and found the causes later. I don't know how much it ended up costing them.

      As it happens, I work for an engineering company that does control systems for production lines, and we use a lot of photo eyes. Three weeks sounds like kind of a long period of time to diagnose this problem. I'm not saying it didn't happen. But maybe the business should've hired some professionals to come look at it sooner. That is, if keeping the production line going was important to them...

      On the other hand, maybe the guy who was fired was smart enough to know the management at the company wasn't smart enough to get anyone out there and just fix it, so maybe it was a good move. (Even if it was childish and vindictive.)

    11. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have thought the photo eyes would have been the first thing replaced if they weren't switching.

    12. Re:Wow... by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      I would have thought the photo eyes would have been the first thing replaced if they weren't switching.

      We were discussing diagnostics and troubleshooting a few months back, and it turns out checking photo eyes (and barcode scanners) is one of the first items on the list in an engineer's mind, in many cases. The reason isn't so much that they fail on their own. Instead, the problem is that factories are extremely dusty and dirty places, in most cases. Even if you're working with electronics or something relatively clean-sounding, there is still a huge amount of dust from cardboard boxes used to ship things in and out.

      And it turns out that photo eyes and barcode scanners don't work as well as you might like if they are covered with dust. So if things aren't reading right, one of the first questions out of an engineer's mouth is, "Have you checked the photo eyes for dust?". One would hope that in the process of checking it for dust, you'd find any stray Scotch tape that might also be on the lense...

    13. Re:Wow... by arachnoprobe · · Score: 1

      Did you tried getting hired as a consultants for layoffs at that company?

    14. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went through a similar episode, though I worked for a bank with access to millions of peoples' accounts and credit records, and the ability to create accounts and transfer funds, during my four weeks notice.

    15. Re:Wow... by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But if they all fail together... You can imagine the conversation

      Techie 1:- Have you checked the sensors for dust?

      Techie 2:- No, but they can't all have got dusty at the same time, surely it must be something they all have in common. Let's check the computer again.

      I know I've missed the apparently obvious through a very similar argument.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    16. Re:Wow... by boater+rich · · Score: 1

      In the UK a while back employees have been fired by Text, or should that be txt. UR Fired Rich

    17. Re:Wow... by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      Hmmm. When Alcatel laid me off years ago, they locked down all the computers in the building, so there was no way to check our e-mail. I hope Radio Shack got it right in that regard.

      On the positive side, being sacked by e-mail could mean that you don't have to endure the indignity of slogging to work through rush-hour traffic only to be told to go home.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    18. Re:Wow... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I guess you aren't aware of fast food and strip mall stores. Radio Shack qualifies as a strip mall store.
      None of those businesses have security guards. It's usually the manager on duty to tell the employee "you're fired!", give them their last paycheck, and see them out.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    19. Re:Wow... by saider · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quitting generally disqualifies you for any kind of unemployment benefits. Only quit if you are given a nice juicy severance package.

      Most unemployment benefits are 26 weeks of minimum wage pay (generally about 5k). Understand this when negotiating your severance.

      I was laid off after being given "unofficial" notice a full 4 months in advance. I had a chance to restructure my debt, get "layoff" insurance, and all kinds of other stuff that made the transistion much easier. Definitely a good way to go.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    20. Re:Wow... by QMO · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, did you retire to your own tropical island, or do you have a penthouse apartment overlooking Central Park?

      (or both?)

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    21. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I guess you didn't read TFA. The layoffs involved jobs at corporate headquarters, not in the actual retail stores.

    22. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've never seen a company fire someone who didn't have a security guard escort them to the desk for thier belongings and then to the the door

      When I was laid off in 2003 they told me in late November that it would be effective at the end of the year. I got a good severance package, and a placement consultant from an outside firm.

    23. Re:Wow... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I do know of a guy who was fired at some company (not nameing names) and was left to finish his shift. He wasn't escorted out or monitored and decided to place clear scotch tape over a few dozen opticle sensors on the production line after his shift. This was on friday and it took three weeks to get the production line going again. Every section was registering an obstruction when there wasn't, the computer was replaced two times and you couldn't see the tape on the sensor heads. Eventualy someoen decided to replace everthing on the control and safety circuits and found the causes later. I don't know how much it ended up costing them.

      This is exactly why ex-employees are escorted out or not permitted back into the building.

    24. Re:Wow... by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 1
      Having been a consultant to numerous companies, I've always enjoyed watching how they either fire or lay people off.

      Some of my favorite ways:

      • Disable the user's account. Now the sysadm is responsible for telling them when they ask for their password to be reset.
      • During massive layoffs, page the impacted employees one at a time to their manager's office. This way everyone knows who's getting toasted.
      • Have armed guards grab the employee's badge when he attempts to enter the facility, handing him his box of personal possessions from his desk (the facility had over 10,000 employees; the guards were impressive in their vigilance).
      • While working up your nerve to fire the person, say "yes" when they volunteer to pick up pizza so you can continue to work through lunch (and let them know they're fired around your last mouthful of pizza).
      • Have the employee drive you to a customer site so that you can finally meet the customer. Unfortunately, the employee started asking about the layoffs and figure it out before getting to the customer site.
    25. Re:Wow... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Wow, I guess you didn't read TFA either.

      Laid-off workers got one to three weeks pay for each year of service, up to 16 weeks for hourly employees and 36 weeks for those with base bay of at least $90,000, the company said.

      hourly employees = strip mall employees

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    26. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised it didn't become popular to fire people by voicemail when that was the "new" thing.

      When DEC had one of its massive rounds of layoffs in the 90's, some people did get fired by voicemail. I suspect it was by managers who were afraid to fire the people in person.

    27. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whenever I've been made redundant or quit, they just let me work as normal until the end of the month, although they didn't assign me any long-term projects after the announcement. I even had some fun leaving parties!

      Many of my former co-workers have turned up again months/years later as business picks up, so it may be best not to burn bridges on either side.

    28. Re:Wow... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      nah, we had the worst thing I've ever heard of here during one of our cullings a couple years ago.

      Guy was a trainer, travelling all over to various offices. He was here in our office to deliver Lotus Notes training to about 20 people. Yep, they showed up for the class only to see a quickly scrawled note on the whiteboard informing them class was cancelled.

      We found out later he was on the list, his manager knew (as did my manager about one of the ppl on our team) a couple days before and tried to arrange things so this poor guy wasn't in Chicago the day he was to be laid off.

      No, said HR: this has to be super-secret and no one can get any hint that there are layoffs or it will be anarchy among the workers. Telling this guy to not go to Chicago on Tuesday might upset the balance of the elemental forces of nature! A@@hats.

      So, the manager has no choice but to watch Bob pack his things and take a flight to Chicago, knowing he was going to have to call him there to tell him he was out of a job. The best part is they were supposed to coordinate the "involuntary separations" at 10:00, presumably so word would not spread to those affected before their managers got to them. Of course, word spread early in the day and people knew names and everything hours before this damn super-secret plan was to go into action. Poor Bob heard from a stranger that he was "on the list". He called his boss and asked if this was true, was told yes. So he wrote the note on the wall, headed to the nearest open bar (8 am) and proceeded to drink his return ticket.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    29. Re:Wow... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I had a chance to restructure my debt, get "layoff" insurance..."

      Could you elaborate on layoff insurance? I've never heard of that.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Wow... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Didn't this happen in HongKong or somewhere?

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    31. Re:Wow... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      In one of my previous workplaces they had a big layoff and everyone knew about it coming. One guy came in and his account had been deactivated first thing but they didn't tell him that he was gonzo until the end of the day so he sat waiting. They had told him that he wasn't one of the ones being cut.

    32. Re:Wow... by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      The last one would be great...from the employees perspective
      get "lost" in the middle of nowhere and then tell the manager to get the fuck out of the car.

      bonus points for making it an area with known bad cell service

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    33. Re:Wow... by digirus · · Score: 1

      Firing by email simply can not be taken as offical with some due process involved. Email can be faked. Email admins can log in an anyone and send email to anyone. If you're savy enough you can probably telnet to port 25 on your exchange server and send a fake email to anyone form anyone without having any sort of admin rights. You'd have to read the headers to know it was a fake. How many average employees know how to imterpret email headers?

    34. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it all happens in the past so...

      It goes like this, you show up for work on payday or come in to get your check. After standing in an unusual line, your issued a form letter making the situation clear that your fired and you have to stand in another line to get any personal belongings left in the building. Also this is your one and only chance to do so, hope you don't have any important engagments for the day.

      However that plays out is what was ment by that sentence.

    35. Re:Wow... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The guy who was fired was the head of the matinence department and originaly work for the company who developed the line. I'm not sure if his replacment was actualy qualified to be his replacment. But the replacment deemed it to be the computer wich took a week to get a "bad replacment computer board" in, then another week to get it replaced. They eventualy called in the company who originaly developed and installed the equiptment. The guy who was laid off had originaly been part of that team and was lured away after the instalation.

      His termination apearently was part office politics and part he was paid too much. His direct supervisor had been making comments in the previous month or so about how he made less then the maintinence department head. One of the comments had something to do with replacing the entire department with trained monkeys and get better results. This is also lesson in why managment shouldn't pal around and become drinking buddies with employees.

    36. Re:Wow... by billcopc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm just guessing he means those little scammy insurances you can get for loans and credit cards, where they cover your monthly payment if you're involuntarily out of work. It's kind of like "pogey" for your debt.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    37. Re:Wow... by saider · · Score: 1

      I'm just guessing he means those little scammy insurances you can get for loans and credit cards, where they cover your monthly payment if you're involuntarily out of work. It's kind of like "pogey" for your debt.

      Yup, exactly like that.

      I had gone out and did some job hunting at the time and the market then was pretty grim in my area and I did not feel like moving (again). I did the math and figured that if I was laid off for more than 5 months, I would breakeven on the cost of the insurance.

      I was out of work for about 9 months. So I still have it, knowing I got more out than I put in, and for the next 12 or so years, I don't have to worry about losing my house to a layoff.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    38. Re:Wow... by saider · · Score: 1


      Mortgages and Car payments give you the option at signing time. I refinanced and got the insurance (as well as some cash to ride it out). You can also get it from other companies like The Duck (Aflack). They usually have a 30-day waiting period from the time you sign to the engagement of the contract, so beware of your timing.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    39. Re:Wow... by sporkmonger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what virtually everyone has told me, but at the time, I had no idea that layoffs were coming or that the company was about to be sold. But seriously, I can't complain. Ruby is now paying the bills instead of Java, and it's paying the bills twice as quickly with half the effort. What's not to like?

    40. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unemployment in Arizona is capped @ $205/week and you can only collect it for 12 weeks. Since we're all sharing layoff stories, here's mine.

      Show up @ the AZ Department of Economic Security. The staff member there proceeds to show me a bunch of VB/Access jobs that pay ~ $8/hour.
      When I don't bite, she reminds me that unemployment is less than minimum wage and suggests that maybe I should consider going to bartending school.
      It gets better. I filed for unemployment but never got a check. Turns out my employer had attached all kinds of conditions -- I was supposed to call
      this one particular guy every Monday by 8 a.m. to see if they had any jobs for me. Then I had to write them a weekly letter. Failure to do either of those
      was counted as quitting. How did I find out about this? When I finally did get a job a month later (without ever having received a cent of unemployment) I got a leter from DES stating that I was being audited for applying for unemployment. Best part? I was instructed to wait by the phone between 8am and 5pm on a given day -- the same day I was going to start my new job.

      The next job doesn't last too long but know I know the ropes. Arizona has implemented a web-based method of applying for unemployment. Every time I would visit the https site IE would complain about an invalid certificate (the site didn't work with Mozilla). I called tech support for the state and the oh-so-helpful guy on the other end said "We've already got your SSN. If I wanted to screw you I wouldn't need any help from you."

    41. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm try again einstine

      1 a good number of RadioShack stores are in actual real malls (hint most Malls have a RadioShack in them )

      2 store level employees DO NOT HAVE UNIQUE E-MAIL ADDRESSES!!

      this was most likely either RiverSide Campus employees or divisional/ regional employees

  5. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 4, Funny

    Radio Shack actually hired these guys from Sony's Advanced Systems Sodium-Chloride Electronics Division (SASSED). The sassed employee's were fired for explosive behavior, assault, and battery. Even though the workers were feeling blue, Ray Sirr, a manager on the project, said that other employee's were safe, and the fired employee's were pre-picked, and put in a queue, cataloging it all. I just hope that all of you, PC in all, realize what was going with, by quickly scanning what i have written.

    1. Re:Moo by master_twig · · Score: 1

      you've been waiting a long time to say that, haven't you? :)

    2. Re:Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

      If you consider five minutes a long time, then, well, maybe. :)

    3. Re:Moo by karolgajewski · · Score: 1

      I must have drank the stupid coffee this morning. Could you walk me through this joke?

      --
      - .k. -
    4. Re:Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

      "Nothing to see here, please move on folks."

      It really isn't worth your time, it was just for a quick chuckle. :P

  6. Worse than... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd say this is worse than getting a job application rebuffed by a form letter. With a job application, they don't know you and you really are little more than a name (at best) and a number (at worst) to them. For termination of employment somebody really ought to know who you are and what service you have provided the company. It's inexcusible - and a good indication of what those up the ladder really think about their workers. "Your job is very important to us... please hold."

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:Worse than... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with getting a job application rebuffed by a form letter (and I speak as one who has had many), so this is definately worse.

      But I really believe that these mass firings are something that can be avoided in most cases. Unless there has been a huge shift in the marketplace, or what the company wants to do, then there is no need for letting 400 people go. Unless management is incompetent - which they seem to be.

      There should be a constant monitoring of the state of a company, and people should be let go in small groups, due to models of the business. There is no need to wake up one day, and say we have 400 employess too many.

    2. Re:Worse than... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      funny....

      no corperation gives a rats ass about their employees.
      this has been true for decades.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Worse than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once sent a rejection form letter for a job that stated "We decided not to hire you for the following reason(s)", and then there were several checkboxes to choose from. Let me tell you...that does not make one feel good, or give a professional image to the company.

    4. Re:Worse than... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I was once sent a rejection form letter for a job that stated "We decided not to hire you for the following reason(s)", and then there were several checkboxes to choose from. Let me tell you...that does not make one feel good, or give a professional image to the company.
       
      You are right, it doesn't feel great, but there is nothing that will change that. You are being rejected, there is no way to make it feel better. THe one positive to your letter, is that you got some feedback. All my letters provide no information at all.

    5. Re:Worse than... by 706GL · · Score: 1

      I interviewed for one job where they promised me that they would call with the outcome in a few days. A month later I received a postcard (not letter) saying that I didn't get the job. But that wasn't the bad part, apparently my profile remained in their HR system for another 6 months, so every time someone looked at my profile, and then subsequently didn't hire me, I received another postcard. One day I got like 6 of them. "Just in case you forgot we don't think your good enough to work here..."

      --
      ...
    6. Re:Worse than... by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      One day I got like 6 of them. "Just in case you forgot we don't think your good enough to work here..."

      Lol. On the bright side, that's gotta be a sign this was a place you really wouldn't want to work anyway. Do you really need 6 postcards everytime you forget to put a cover sheet on your TPS reports? "Did you get the memo...?"

    7. Re:Worse than... by Jarnin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They haven't cared about their employees since they started referring to workers as 'human resources'.

      I got into a discussion last week with some friends at a bar, basically saying that corporations are just another flavor of a feudalistic system of government. Of course they nodded, but they didn't understand my point: we went to war with the British to get rid of feudalistic control over the American colonies, and yet we didn't think that a feudalistic system in the workplace was going to be a problem. Well, it is.
      Corporations now own politicians. Some corporations make more money than entire countries. These corporations have no checks or balances; if a nation's government doesn't like something the corporation is doing, they can try to bring them to justice, but with corrupt politicians and the money the corporations hold, they can either buy themselves out of trouble, or simply move their operation to another country.

      What we really need is a competing system of workplace governance that is democratically operated. These exist now in some parts of the world, such as the Moondragon Cooperative Corporation in Spain. These 'corporations' are owned and operated by their workers, with management and executives being voted into office by those workers.

      If you believe in democracy, then you should be against the feudalistic system that corporations embrace, just as you would be against a feudalistic form of government in Iraq or Sudan.

    8. Re:Worse than... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1
      we went to war with the British to get rid of feudalistic control over the American colonies


      Actually, the U.S. went to war with the British because the British were at the top of the ladder, but were overseas. After U.S. independence, society didn't reorganize--the ladder is still the same, just with the top rung cut off.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  7. Sign of the future by virtuald · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Wow... that would really suck. I mean, I guess for the company, it makes life easier, because you don't have to deal with confrontation -- but it certainly doesn't motivate me to go and try and get a job from them. What if someone didn't check their email? That would be really awkward..

    Reminds me of "Office Space".

    1. Re:Sign of the future by N.+P.+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      If you don't check your email... you're not fired!

      (I'm unplugging my computer. There, now my job's safe.)

    2. Re:Sign of the future by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      it makes life easier, because you don't have to deal with confrontation

      The Bobs: We like to fire people on Friday...you see studies have shown that there is statistically less chance of an incident that way...

      Lumberg: mmmmm....grrreat.

    3. Re:Sign of the future by mccoma · · Score: 2, Funny

      sign of the future -> actually "Back to the Future Part 2"

    4. Re:Sign of the future by pilgrim23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It DOES inspire me.. It inspires me to use another vendor for my needs. I see little reason to reward such corporate behavior, and in a capitalist society you comment on such displeasure with your dollars. Fortunately there is the Web.....because I already dispise Fry's...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    5. Re:Sign of the future by stinerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My boss is from South Korea, and he had an interesting story to tell about a job he worked.

      Apparently at this company, whenever a decision was made to fire an employee, they would send someone out to remove your desk from the premises ... but only if you weren't there. When you got back, you'd wonder where your desk was and be greeted by someone to help you leave the building. This caught on very quickly with the employees, so if they thought they were getting the axe, they'd simply never leave their desk. They would forgo breaks, get there earliest, and leave the latest.

    6. Re:Sign of the future by iwsnet · · Score: 0

      Well they need to save money. That's why they are laying off workers. Now they don't have to print out letters when they can just do it by e-mail.

    7. Re:Sign of the future by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      What if someone didn't check their email?

      Easy make not checking your email a sackable offence.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    8. Re:Sign of the future by hey! · · Score: 1

      Wow... that would really suck. I mean, I guess for the company, it makes life easier, because you don't have to deal with confrontation

      Sometimes you do have to let people go. But sometimes the way companies do that make me wonder whether the reason they find themselves in that position is that they don't like confronting unpleasant realities.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Sign of the future by Peter+Mork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, it sounds like the company won:

      1. Insinuate that some employees might be fired.
      2. Watch them work themselves to death.
      3. Profit!
    10. Re:Sign of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 2 may well be optional.

      All it guarantees is that someone will be stuck to their desk like glue, not that they'll actually work.

    11. Re:Sign of the future by bogibear · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember when Inacom shut down and notified all their workers via pager?? One company a friend worked for fired people by first disabling their access badges. They were forced to use the main entrance where they were greeted by HR and security, escorted to their desks and walked out the door. Apparently one morning, the security system was fubar and everyone had to go through the main entrance. Talk about some panicky workers.

    12. Re:Sign of the future by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Why? You can't fire them twice.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    13. Re:Sign of the future by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 1

      because I already dispise Fry's...

      Got a good story to tell?

      *Note* I not being sarcastic or facetious.

      --
      I think I think, therefore I think I am.
    14. Re:Sign of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the point....

  8. New slogan by toupsie · · Score: 4, Funny
    You've got e-mail, we've got pink slips!

    My only question is if they outsourced the e-mail pink slip processing to an Indian firm. That would have given Radio Shack double plus style points. I would not be too shocked if someone goes e-postal over this.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:New slogan by wizzard2k · · Score: 1

      That's what they get for downsizing the HR department first!

    2. Re:New slogan by sd_diamond · · Score: 1

      I would not be too shocked if someone goes e-postal over this.

      You mean, made a Half-Life mod of Radio Shack HQ with the board of directors as the bad guys?

    3. Re:New slogan by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      To my mind, "going e-postal" would mean a DOS attack against their mail server. If they infected the mail servers with some sort of destructive virus then that'd be even closer.

  9. I know what my reply would be by saskboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    "you-can't-fire-me-I-equit"

    I'd reply with, "Ha Ha, joke's on you. I've been working from home for the past 8 months, and have been selling the store's LED flashlights on eBay."

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:I know what my reply would be by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Actually that is a very bad thing to admit to stealing. It is best to be made redundant (firing is a different matter) since you normally get a package or a "copper" hand-shake, even then I would check the content of the "copper".

      You honestly don't think a "golden" handshake applies to anyone but a CEO do you?

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    2. Re:I know what my reply would be by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it's a bad idea to steal, and especially to admit to it to a former boss. I forgot my little wink at the end ;-)

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:I know what my reply would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but (never mind the stealing part) if you quit, you forfeit the severence package.

  10. e-fired? by Superpants · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should be e-happy they got e-fired because Radio-Shack e-sucks. Besides, they can always be e-hired again at BestBuy or some other know nothing e-electronics store. At least I e-think so...

    1. Re:e-fired? by xicodarap · · Score: 1

      e-i-e-i-o

    2. Re:e-fired? by QuiK_ChaoS · · Score: 1

      Don't be so critical. Don't you relize these guys have beta tested Win95 and WinME and have the t-shirts to prove it?

  11. Have you by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you ever met a Radio Shack employee? Methinks they should all be fired (and replaced by someone who knows what they are talking about).

    I used to want to work there, back when they sold computers and gizmos for hobby electronics instead of being a glorified cell phone store (though I do suppose cell phones are a type of radio, so it is more fitting...)

    1. Re:Have you by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If somebody knew what they were talking about, would they be working at Radio Shack?

    2. Re:Have you by Gemini_25_RB · · Score: 1

      Back in my years of youth, I applied to work at RadioShack. During the interview, I showed some knowledge of technology, and the interviewer (a manager, I believe) said he was honestly surprised I knew something about the products before working there. (They ended up not giving me the job due to a lack of people skills. ... Maybe people skills and tech intelligence are inversely proportional....it would explain a lot about those stores.)

    3. Re:Have you by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      If somebody knew what they were talking about, would they be working at Radio Shack?

      Actually I knew someone who knew what they were talking about, and still worked at Radio Shack, it was a very sad thing...

    4. Re:Have you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The quality of service has declined because the company has decided that they no longer offer service, unless you are looking for new cellphone service. I'd say that about 15% of shack employees today could tell you what a resistor does. About a quarter of those could match one up for you. About a quarter of those could help you repair a device or offer expert advice. While this is not many, you still have a one in twenty to fifty shot with the shack at finding a really good tech (you know who you are). I'd say this is at least ten times your chances at most other major retail electronics stores. FYI: http://www.radioshacksucks.com/

    5. Re:Have you by lord_mike · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, when I worked there when I was in college, they were thrilled to have me since I at least had a rudimentary understanding of electronics. Every time some nerdy looking guy came into the store, they'd always send him to me. If somebody was hanging out in the back by the small electronic parts, they'd send me back there. I was no engineer, but I at least knew what a resistor was, and could point them to the transistors and diodes. The customers were as shoked as the rest of the employees. I even read their "Getting Started in Electronics" book and helped one customer build his own car alarm dummy box. I was one of the 15%. Certainly, I was the ONLY salesman in the store that knew anything aobut the parts in the back.

      The company has a hate/hate relationship with electronic parts. Radio Shack soooo desperately wants to be Best Buy or Circuit City, but with their lousy prices on high-end stuff, they just can't pull it off. The electronic parts section that the company despises is the only thing that keeps them afloat. If they could find a way to BE circuit city, the parts section in the back of the store would be eliminated overnight. I'm sure that the future of selling electronic parts keeps the Tandy executives from sleeping soundly at night, but with a 300% gross profit on that stuff, they just can't let go of their only really profitable business.

      Thanks,

      Mike

    6. Re:Have you by RevDobbs · · Score: 1
      I'd say that about 15% of shack employees today could tell you what a resistor does.

      Come on, man, your math is off. When you add the percent sign, you move the decimal two place to the right, not four. Here's the correction:

      I'd say that about .15% of shack employees today could tell you what a resistor does.
    7. Re:Have you by metallel · · Score: 1

      Yeah I used to work there too. 2 summers during college about 20 years ago. We used to get told these horror stories about regional managers coming into a store, seeing one thing out of place and firing the whole store. Before I got hired, they made me take a polygraph. It's always been kind of an odd company. So this latest development really doesn't surprise me. It was just this year that their president had to resign because he'd put a fake degree on his resumé. Moral of the story: companies that go from leathercrafts to electronics rarely do it well.

    8. Re:Have you by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      Have you ever met a Radio Shack employee? Methinks they should all be fired (and replaced by someone who knows what they are talking about).

      The most clueless Radio Sack employee that I ever dealt with was when I wanted a solar car battery charger. ( You've probably seen one, it's simply a cluster of photovoltaic cells connected to a cigarette lighter connector. Very useful for the second car that you drive once a month. ) I tried telling her what I was looking for, and she led me to a bunch of phone chargers that plugged into the cigarette lighter socket. After several more tries, it finally became obvious what the problem was. She knew that the cigarette lighter socket was connected to the battery. She knew that batteries could be charged. But she did not understand that electricity could flow either way on a wire. It was a new concept for her.
      I left in a hurry, fearful that her head might explode.

    9. Re:Have you by sporkme · · Score: 1

      The ones the shack sold did not really last, so all the better. I reused the adapter, but the cells had broken down after six months.

    10. Re:Have you by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 5, Funny

      My worst ever: I was trying to buy an adapter so I could plug an old IBM Model M keyboard (with the old AT / 5-pin DIN style connector) into a newer computer (Mini-DIN 6-pin / PS/2). The employee, who I could swear was a robot, kept completely disregarding everything I said; just the look on their face made it obvious they were filtering out all the things they didn't understand, which basically meant they were hearing, "I need a thingy that makes a thingus be able to attach to a thingeroo it's not supposed to attach to.", I guess...and then they would say, "Yeah, we have that." *points at drawers where they keep all the capacitors, resistors, etc.* After the third attempt to explain what I needed to them, they got all exasperated, walked over the the drawers, and pulled out the drawer containing...alligator clips. GAH! I came within an inch of an aneurysm, I swear...

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    11. Re:Have you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now be nice. If you know someone who works for Radio Shack, this is the time to show you care. Help them log on to their email system and be sure to read their mail to them very slowly. Feel free to use smaller words to help them understand the message.

    12. Re:Have you by XO · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it has something to do with the general intelligence level of the population, or the general caring level of the population. All employees are required to have learned all the basics, but that doesn't mean that it stuck.

      I know there are at least a dozen employees in the company that can handle just about anything you can throw at them, because I trained them to be able to do that.

      Unfortunatly, I didn't even get an email that my job was gone, I picked up my company cell phone to make a call on my day off, and was told I was no longer employed.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    13. Re:Have you by evolseven · · Score: 1

      I honestly doubt it is as high as you say it is.. I worked for corporate about 5 years ago, manning the 1800-the-shack tech line.... it was about a 22 man team that did the whole thing.. and all of us at least had basic knowledge of every product there.. we actually had a "playroom" with pretty much everything radio shack had sold in the last 5 years, honestly they didn't pay all that well.. but for a 19 year old it did good.. anyway they laid off the entire department (probably got outsourced).. and that probably got rid of half of the knowledgeable people at the company.

    14. Re:Have you by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hear stories like this all the time, from people who expect everybody to know exactly what they know. They often have an inability to explain things properly. I used to work with a guy like this, and whenever he need help with an source code problem, it would take a few minutes for me to question him on what he was talking about. He had problems seeing that I hadn't been working on what he had just been working on, so I didn't know what he was talking about - he would do this with everybody, everytime.

      Surely you have dealt with people before who don't know as much as you, you need to find a way to communicate your problem simply. What do you expect a salesman to know everything in the store, especially one like radio shack with thousands of hobbiest/expert products.

    15. Re:Have you by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      I don;t agree with you.
      If you visit stores in NH especially Concorde or Keene, the Radio Shack guys are quite knowledgable and well read.
      They will actually attempt to answer your questions.
      MAybe its got to do with being a Localite who you meet at the beer party. Keene is a pretty closed town.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    16. Re:Have you by Skater · · Score: 1

      Wow. My experience with Radio Shack employees is that they know nothing AND have no people skills, so I'm surprised they'd reject someone on those grounds. (And in your case, I have a feeling the _manager_ was the one lacking in people skills, not you...)

    17. Re:Have you by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      300%...I think you overestimate the wholesale value of the merchandise. Most items can be mail ordered in qty 1, with shipping, for comparable money. Radio Shack is fro when you have to have it *right now* and don't care that you're going to throw away a few dollars to have it.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    18. Re:Have you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I realised as a kid that Tandy (as they were known in Australia) parts sucked for price and service. If I needed 1 resistor, I would have to buy 4 or more overpriced, overpackaged resistors.

      Consequently I always bought at Dick Smith, and avoided Tandy like the plague.

      The distinction between the two retailers, in the early 1980s, could not have been clearer. Tandy sold computers, the TRS-80 Model 1, but they didn't have a clue about them. Tandy was a store to buy a stereo system or a radio, mostly. The electronic parts were overpriced and overpackaged. Their salesmen knew nothing about electronics. Tandy were useful for the "Battery of the Month" club (I had about 6 cards at one stage).

      Dick Smith, on the other hand, hired electronics geeks to the retail stores. They could explain why you needed a Yagi antenna and not a dipole. The stores were good for mostly components, and a variety of interesting computers (back in the early 1980s), and radios. Dick Smith himself started out repairing radios. So the stores were quite well stocked with transceivers (which I could not afford).

      Since Woolworths bought Dick Smith the store focus changed. Less emphasis on components, more emphasis on computers and cheap plastic toys. Fewer geeks behind the counter (but unlike Tandy, not totally devoid of them).

      These days Dick Smith and Tandy are virtually indistinguishable, particularly regarding the cheap plastic toys. I'll go to either Dick Smith or Jaycar for components. If it's something rare or unusual I will try David Reid in York St Sydney.

    19. Re:Have you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at a Radio Shack with a guy named Mike. Was this in Ohio in the early 90s?

    20. Re:Have you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of disagree with you. Radio Shack generally has very nice people working there. Their technical knowledge is often VERY lacking, but they don't try to pretend like they have a clue. You really can't expect someone making $7/hr to have an advanced knowledge of transistors these days...

      Though my eyes did well up with tears one day when I went to buy solder at my local radio shack and the clerk didn't know what I was talking about and it took him ten minutes to find some. There was another geek standing next to me, and we both kind of looked at each other and I could see it in his eyes that we both wanted to hold each other...

    21. Re:Have you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in case you're still looking, try the Radio Shack product with the SKU 260-0148, "AT-PS/2 Adapter Pack". You could have also tried to look it up on the Internet Center computer present in every store which runs what is at RadioShack.com.

      RS just doesn't attract brilliant people. What do you expect for a base pay of nearly minimum wage? You get what you pay for.

      If you've ever bought a cell phone, you know its a two year commitment to a monthly charge and lots of fees for the cool services and features. Its not a tough thing to sell phones, but in some markets, especially affluent, tech-savy they don't see a cell phone as a status symbol so only want a phone to do what phones originally do: make and take calls.

      Management is doing what they always have done. Office Space and Dilbert has it right.

    22. Re:Have you by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
      Homer: We'll search out every place a sick twisted solitary misfit might run to.

      Lisa: I'll start with Radio Shack.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    23. Re:Have you by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Have you ever met a Radio Shack employee

      Met them?? Every time I go into a Radio Shack, I'm TACKLED by them. I've got two guys pestering me about their sales, another guy trying to sign me up for their credit card, and a fourth guy pressuring me to enroll in their damn "battery club." And all I want to do is buy a simple electronic component.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:Have you by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Before I got hired, they made me take a polygraph. It's always been kind of an odd company.

      It was the first store I ever went to that demanded my name, address, and phone number when I was just trying to buy a simple pack of batteries.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    25. Re:Have you by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, Radio Shack would rather have people who can politely tell you they have no idea what you're talking about and can't help you at all, vs. someone who knows what you're talking about, and has suggestions to solve the problem that you might not even thought of but doesn't say 'sir', slouches, and doesn't look you firmly in the eye?

      That explains a lot.

      And, no, that's not really Radio Shack's fault. It's society's fault for valuing stupid things, where the appearance of being helpful is more important than actually being fucking helpful.

      I hate it when I go into stores, and people ask me if they can help me, and then, when they try, the only response on my part should be 'Well, we've determined that you cannot, in fact, help me, because you have much less knowledge about this than I do, despite you working in a damn store selling the things'.

      Seriously, that's excusable when you stop some random employee walking by the door area in Home Depot. Maybe the guy works in paint and is a paint guru, but knows nothing about sizing a door. Fair enough. But Radio Shack is small enough that I could explain the basic concepts behind everything there in a day, explaining that this is an RCA connector and how a typical wireless router is used.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    26. Re:Have you by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      The company has a hate/hate relationship with electronic parts. Radio Shack soooo desperately wants to be Best Buy or Circuit City, but with their lousy prices on high-end stuff, they just can't pull it off. The electronic parts section that the company despises is the only thing that keeps them afloat.

      That, right there, is their fucking problem. Especially with people now purchasing TVs and DVD players at Walmart. They cannot compete in that business.

      They need to get back to hobbiests, and get to the hobbyists they've been completely ignoring, the computer ones. I don't build things out of transistors, but I would be thrilled to have a place with videocards and motherboards and computer cases and memory. It would be great to have a place I could say 'Dear God, this computer has 128 megs of ram and is running XP! I'll run to Radio Shack and pick up a 256 or 512 more megs'. Instead there's a larger selection in, yup, Walmart! (And Walmart has almost nothing at all.)

      Radio Shack is directly competing with about a dozen different stores, all of whom have a larger selection and lower prices. And it's competing with Walmart. If they would take the 'hobbyist' reputation and expand that beyond 'electronic wiring', they might actually get somewhere. (Yeah, yeah, they'd be competing with Compusa, but those are fairly rare, and a hell of a lot better than competing with Walmart.)

      And while I don't know much about it, there's a whole car electronic hobbyist thingy. Yes, there are stores for that, but they are pretty rare, too. Yeah, you can get wiring, but not things like car fuse holders.

      Hell, there are probably other hobbyists out there too. Radio controlled airplanes? People building their own wireless speakers? Home automation people? DJs? I don't know what groups exist, but I do know the people sitting around soldiering things to circuit boards is nowhere near where it was it the 80s. Nowadays, they buy ICs and program them...and good luck finding those at Radio Shack.(1)

      Seriously, Radio Shack is stuck in the 80s with their hobbyist stuff, and can't make a profit on anything else. For a while they sold TVs, and then cellphones, but those are idiotic markets to be in now.

      1) Hey, there's an idea, right there. Sell programmable ICs, and provide a free kiosk that you can plug them into to program them, for people who want one or two ICs, but don't want to buy a IC flasher thingy.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    27. Re:Have you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I am still enjoying the benefits of an emp line on my celphone (despite having been fired/quit/transfered 1/2 a year ago).

      And yes, RS is a HORRIBLE corporate model. All of their attempts to recover are BAD, the one just before I left was a new pay scale for associates/managers.
      Associates now recieve: Base pay ($7 sometihng) + Commission(you have a "goal", you earn 5% of anything over that goal for the week) + Spiffs (insentive for selling key products like cellphones).
      This was designed to lower turnover and hold onto good associates (that was how it was explained). The only problem is that if you broke it down it actualy LOWERED the pay good associates (those that can sell, and turn good proffit), and segnificantly raised it of those that sucked.
      The old system was (minimum wage + Spiff) OR (Commission + Spiff). The big difference was that commission was 7.something% of high margin items (parts, batterys, accessories) and 5.somethin% of low margin (iPods, etc).
      With the old system you had an incentive to offer batteries, and to HELP a customer find the parts he/she needed (Yes, I was the guy that could find what you needed, I didn't always know EXACTLY what it did, but I had a good idea, and I knew where it was).
      New system? note that 5.something% + 7.something% vs the 5% commission. The new system was set up that you had a higher guarantee (store does crapy? ok, you get $8sometihng/hr instead of minimum wage), if you were a midlevel associate you didn't see much of a change. If you were a star seller, you could lose up to $100 on a paycheck, if not more.

      The new pay rates also encurage you to sell only high $ items (iPods, home theater, etc) and Cell Phones.

      As for managers and what not? the managers tend to be the least knowledgable about product, they jsut know how to BS and sell.

    28. Re:Have you by TwitchCHNO · · Score: 1

      I've notice that rural radio shacks attract the towns alpha geeks. In small towns - large enough to attract a walmart - but small enough not to have any real businesses. I've encountered VERY knowledgeable staff at Radio shack.

      The Radioshack in Butler PA has a guy who's into cellphones & bluetooth Jacking - he showed me how to set any MP3 as a ring tone & even gave me the parts to make a serial to phone cable to access the lower levels of the phone.

      The Radioshack near Alfred / Almond NY has two employees that are really into HAM radios, they know everything about building antennaes.

      Once you get into larger cities - where there are actual employment opportunities for the alpha geeks - the Radioshacks tend to suck big time.

      --
      ___________________________
      I'm not a geek, but I play one on TV.
    29. Re:Have you by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Actually, Radio Shack is small enough that I do expect them to know everything in the store, or at least, every area in the store. If you ask them for something, they should be able to walk somewhere, and be within a step or two of where that item is, and then scan the shelf for it. Although obviously some things fit in more than one possible category.

      But that's not the real problem with Radio Shack people. The problem is their lack of general knowledge about the field, like lacking knowledge that car batteries get charged. I'd understand if they said 'Hey, that's an interesting idea, a solar battery charger. If we have one, it should be...um, either in the general car electronic area here, or possibly over there in the battery charging area. Let's see if we can find one.'. Not 'Uh...what? A car cell phone charger?'

      I had the same problem when trying to find a electrical S/PDIF plug panel for my computer. I couldn't seem to convey the concept that I didn't need a S/PDIF cable, which is just a fricking RCA cable and I'm fairly certain I could locate that myself if I needed to add to the dozen or so I have. (1) Instead, I needed something that would either go in a card slot or a 5.25 or 3.5 front panel slot that I could plug a cable into, with wires that run to my motherboard. They kept offering me both optical and electrical S/PDIF cables, although eventually they seemed to somewhat understand and offered me...a sound card with optical digital out. Gah.

      General knowledge of the subject matter is where Radio Shack employees fall down. And that is something you can't 'train', you have to hire people who are already knowledgable about 'how things work'. Other stores I ask employees for help. Radio Shack I don't except as a last resort.

      1) Okay, what the fuck is going on with 'gold-plated, high quality' 6- and 12-feet long digital audio cables? Someone is really missing the point here, and I susect it's not me. If you're losing any digital signal over six feet, even on the crappiest cable, you're running the fucking cable through an unshielded nuclear reactor or something. Are people really this stupid?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    30. Re:Have you by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      You could have also tried to look it up on the Internet Center computer present in every store which runs what is at RadioShack.com.

      No it's not. I know of at least one that doesn't have one, at least as of six days ago.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    31. Re:Have you by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Clearly, your small mind cannot keep pace with the superior intellect of the Radio Shack drone! If you cannot figure out how to build your own adapter out of alligator clips, then you shouldn't even waste their time walking into their door. ;-)

      Back in my day, we built adapters out of little flecks of iron, carefully placed end-to-end on a flat rock.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    32. Re:Have you by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I hear stories like this all the time, from people who expect everybody to know exactly what they know.

      It's not quite like that. It's more an indication of how much Radio Shack has changed over the years.

      Back in the day, Radio Shack was usually staffed by a bunch of big-time geeks. People would go in, ask for a set of really arcane electronic components for what they were building. The staff would invariably know lots about the stuff, and be able to find it for you quickly. Then they'd chat with you about what you're building and what they just built.

      Over time, Radio Shack has become just another retailer of things which use electricity, and the availability of components has dropped to almost nothing. Mostly, because very few (OK, even fewer ;-) people still do any breadboard/component work any more.

      Unfortunately, the average counter person at Radio Shack frequently knows next to nothing about anything, except for what they've been told in training and picked up over time. And, they come across as the worst sort of commission salespeople -- they're more interested in getting my address so they can include me in their promotional crap than actually getting me what I need.

      Here in Canada, where they recently became "The Source" by Circuit City, my experience with them has been that they are about on par with the people in the electronics department in Wal Mart. They just sell stuff, and the quality of that is now mostly crap. I pretty much don't step into the store any more unless I'm looking for something specific, and I usually decline much help from the guys until I'm finally at the cash register.

      Of course, it is totally unfair to expect the guy at the counter to know how to defrobulate your flux capacitor. And it's even more unfair to get cranky that he doesn't know everything. But, some people remember when the guys at Radio Shack used to be able to compare notes on the defrobulation process, and might even be able to help with the flux capacitor. =)

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    33. Re:Have you by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I (stupidly) had my mom go unescorted to a Radio Shack to get a replacement battery for her cordless phone. It wasn't charging so I investigated. The phone needed a NiCd battery, but I found a freaking NiMHreplacement in it! The worst: the polarity of the connector was wrong, too! I took out my multimeter and found that the poor battery was actually holding a charge around 0.8V of the opposite polarity. Of course my mom defended the salesperson, but this is just sheer incompetence. I sure hope they don't give that fscked NiMH battery to someone else.

      And then she most recently went in for a cable to connect her tape recorder to the TV, and they gave her one that didn't do any attenuation. Can you say seriously overmodulated? A headphone to microphone connection needs an attenuator since the levels are different.

      This is the store I used to go to every week when I was a little lad, buying electronic parts to build my own projects. Too bad they went down the tubes.

    34. Re:Have you by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      YES!!! Was your Manager's name Charlie? (We called him Chuck)

      Thanks,

      Mike

    35. Re:Have you by mfrank · · Score: 1

      The one I had didn't work for crap. Put it in my car, didn't drive it for a few months, and when I went to pull it out of the garage, it wouldn't start.

    36. Re:Have you by fm6 · · Score: 1
      So, Radio Shack would rather have people who can politely tell you they have no idea what you're talking about and can't help you at all, vs. someone who knows what you're talking about, and has suggestions to solve the problem that you might not even thought of but doesn't say 'sir', slouches, and doesn't look you firmly in the eye?
      Well, that wouldn't be so bad if they knew they didn't know what they're about.
      when they try, the only response on my part should be 'Well, we've determined that you cannot, in fact, help me, because you have much less knowledge about this than I do, despite you working in a damn store selling the things'.
      Hey, get real — people working in retail mostly don't know that much about technology. If they did, they wouldn't be working in retail. That's OK when the salesperson is humble enough to acknowledge their own ignorance and let you help them help you. Alas, RS employees never do that. I suspect their employee handbook expressly forbids saying "I don't know."
    37. Re:Have you by tomzyk · · Score: 1

      My story isn't quite as bad... but still shows their average employee's ignorance.

      I went in a couple months ago to buy a cassette adapter. I'm trying to explain to the guy that I need one to connect my MP3 player to my car's cassette player so I can listen to my tunes through my car stereo. I had to explain it a few times, but he eventually gets what I'm talking about and says "OH YEAH... But we don't have those. We only have ones that connect CD players to your car." I respond with "Yeah, CD players, walkmans, MP3 players, whatever." and he says back to me "No, we only have the CD player ones."

      WTF Mate? Apparently this guy always bought a new set of headphones with each portable music player he owned. *shrug*

      --
      Karma: NaN
    38. Re:Have you by permawired · · Score: 0

      I hear ya there. I worked for a Rat Shack for about a year when the whole tech market crashed. I went there because I remember them being a good place from when I was a kid and learning about electronics. I was shocked to see what it had become! Even their training books that they forced me to read and "certify" on on were a joke. Several things that were stated in there were 1/2 truths at best. The best part about it however was that I was able to demonstrate to the district manager that the old fasion way of selling (Be honest and be accurate) yields far more profit in the long run. I made the store more money than the manager did because of this. When I left they lost about 50+ customers because those customers wouldn't deal with anyone other than me. It was interesting, but I would never care to do it again.

    39. Re:Have you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio Shack has a few fronts they've actually been really shrewd on. I don't think anyone's ever encroached on their core business, which is figuring out ways to sell you things you don't need. No, I'm not talking about that modular dual port phone adapter, It's the TSP's or whatever they call them now, it's the batteries they pay nothing for, it's accessory sales, but more than anything, it's super high interest credit cards.

      The actual problem is that they don't move enough low end merchandise to make a brick and mortar profitable, nor do they move enough consumer electronics that end up costing the consumer twice as much as the cost once they buy a service plan and figure credit interest. They had a great niche market as the 7/11 slash Sears of consumer electronics goods. I stiill find my way into their stores occasionally, but the American shopping center is ruining the business. Why go to a radio shack when you can do everything else cheaper and better at the Wal-Mart, Home Depot, and Cell Phone Kiosk. They all carry the same things cheaper, and within walking distance.

      After they realized that they couldn't compete on price, they tried to push their staff. Remember "You've got questions, We've Got Answers"?. They tried pushing customer service, but these are minimum wage earners. At least that's what I made there in college. They went from a multiple trick pony to a pony that had a trick to lure you in, then it did some lame tricks that you probably walked out on before they finished the show.

      Then they decided to sell every cell phone, when most 3rd party vendors were locked into one carrier. This was actually kind of novel, since cell tech was actually new to a lot of people at the time, and shopping around in one place was appealing. Too bad every tom dick and harry with a mall kiosk got into that right afterwards.

      I'd have said it wasn't too late for radio shack to fail, but it's inevitable with management in ft. worth like that. There are lots of strategies that could get them to be great again like in the heydays of Tandy, but they're too retarded, being from texas and all.

  12. How the #%$K is this news? by sporkme · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Radio Shack has been in real trouble for years, since shortly before I left. The article mentions RSH stock price closing just over $18, down from around $80 before this all began. I can't say that I am surprised that they chose email as the way to go on the firings.

    Make sure you don't have any beverage in your mouth when you read this: All members of Radio Shack management and all of their top sales people from the entire company, plus most of the corporate staff (thousands of people) just returned home from an all-expenses paid 3 to 6 day drip to Las Vegas, NV for a "Peak of Performance" rally. More like a valley of performance, but to hell with it.

    1. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by deadhammer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The news in this is that we've reached that particular point in our society where a corporation doesn't even have to have the common decency to fire people in person. There's a certain lack of class here - sure, corporations have to lay people off sometimes, that's not the problem, it's the fact that this company thinks so little of the mindless drones working for them that they don't even have the common courtesy to force their overworked, underpaid manager to take them into the back and fire them personally. This is about as anonymous and abusive as it can get. Yes, Radio Shack sucks, and yes, management are jackasses. Corporations like to fire people when they're at "peak performance", whether or not the whole company is circling the drain. This doesn't excuse the fact that they've chosen to lay their employees off in the most lazy, insulting way they possibly could.

      --
      I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
    2. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All members of Radio Shack management and all of their top sales people from the entire company, plus most of the corporate staff (thousands of people) just returned home from an all-expenses paid 3 to 6 day drip to Las Vegas


      It was all for environmental conservation, really. Someone has to water the cactuses, you know. And the palm trees - don't forget the palm trees.
    3. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by the_humeister · · Score: 1
      Radio Shack has been in real trouble for years, since shortly before I left. The article mentions RSH stock price closing just over $18, down from around $80 before this all began. I can't say that I am surprised that they chose email as the way to go on the firings.


      What exactly does the stock price have anything to do with this. That $80/share you quote was back in 2000 when practically every company was overpriced. Hell, AOL bought Time-Warner and MS was worth almost $0.5 trillion back then. Comparing stock prices back then to what they are now doesn't really make any sense. About the only tech-related company of significance that's worth more now versus back then is Apple.
    4. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio Shack doesnt even exist in canada anymore, they got bought out. its now "the source, by circut city"

    5. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by sporkme · · Score: 2, Informative

      Notwithstanding that stock price can serve as a consumer confidence barometer as well as one for expected performance:

      Until 2000-ish, Radio Shack had offered a stock-based 401K. From limited options, employees had been encouraged to choose this plan. Now, they are all worth dick. Furthermore, a comparison reveals that RSH has performed as much as 83% below the S&P.

      "The news in this is that we've reached that particular point in our society where a corporation doesn't even have to have the common decency to fire people in person."

      You're right, and I should have clarified. Radio shack has been pulling questionable downsizing stunts for years.

    6. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by KD5UZZ · · Score: 1
      -All members of Radio Shack management and all of their top sales people from the entire company, -plus most of the corporate staff (thousands of people) just returned home from an all-expenses paid -3 to 6 day drip to Las Vegas, NV for a "Peak of Performance" rally. More like a valley of -performance, but to hell with it.

      Yes, everyone from the store manager up went to Vegas last week.

      NO it wasn't a "Peak of Performance rally", it was to prepare for the "Golden Quarter" (Christmas season). Managers were shown (among many other things) the GQ product lineup and strategy.

      And...

      "Make sure you don't have any beverage in your mouth when you read this:" most of the cost of the trip was paid for by the VENDORS, -NOT- the company.

      --
      -Daniel
      KD5UZZ
      www.w5yj.org
    7. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      I've noticed the same thing. Top sales people and management get top billing, and it's easy to see why. The sales people can point to a big dollar sign with their name on it, and top management gets to assess its own performance. The rest of the workers - the grunts, trench workers, every last one who makes the company go 'round with countless overtime and dedication - are lucky to get $50 gift certificates for good performance. Even though they are just as critical to the well-being of the company as everyone else. Well, almost. There's always some Joe where everyone is wondering exactly what he's doing, and whether he isn't working for the coffee machine repair shop rather than the company,

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    8. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by sporkme · · Score: 1

      Peak of Performance was the most current buzzword when I was still working for them. I think this was when we were all H.O.T. the AAA way. If they want to call it preparation for the almighty golden quarter (we always called it the golden shower but this is a Christmas season reference) then that's all well and good, but nobody ever could polish a turd.

      Vendors do foot much of the bill, but this is part of the return compensation package for the shack carrying these vendors. It's kind of like a job that offers free health insurance; how much higher would your salary be if you paid for it? I did see that the chotchkies were pretty good this year.

    9. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by adam31 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      this company thinks so little of the mindless drones working for them that they don't even have the common courtesy to force their overworked, underpaid manager to take them into the back and fire them personally.


      In what universe does this 'personal firing' by the 'overworked underpaid manager' benefit anyone? Does Mr Overworked enjoy firing? Does the fired employee benefit from some half-assedly personalized and prolonged epilogue to their membership in the Radio Shack Family?

      No, it's all just a total logistical nightmare that's all bullshit anyway. Just fire people in hordes, make sure they can collect their unemployment, write a form-letter-of-recommendation and cut the bullshit down to the absolute, positive minimum.

    10. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by hauntingthunder · · Score: 1
      erm doesn't any one know what the diference between being "Fired" and "Made redundant" is which is what happened to the RS people.

      Fired is wher you get canned for being caught shagging the bose's secratery (Or the boss) on the board room table - being caught with you hand in the till etc.

      Redundacy/laid off is where your job no longer exists - though laid off off implies that if things pick up you get your job back (not 100% sure of the US terminology)

      --
      You will never get to heaven with an Ak 47... But A Zu 30 is good for Low Flying Cherubim
    11. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by mgblst · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think about this for a second - how does it make the rest of the people who still work for you feel. When I worked at a US corporation, HR was spending huge amount of time and money getting everyone to feel like a part of a family - all the better to get people to work hard, and not steal things. I guess Radio Shack doesn't have this sort of ethos.

      If I still worked at Radio Shack, why should I give a shit about the company - and stuff like that shows.

    12. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by dcam · · Score: 1

      I really do hope that you are one of the people who gets fired one of these days. I think it might be an educational experience.

      --
      meh
    13. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for being so considerate!

    14. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just wondering if they cryptographically signed those e-mails. Given the amounts of spam, phishing and joe-jobbing going on, this opens up some really fun possibilites for the malicious types...

    15. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When I worked at a US corporation, HR was spending huge amount of time and money getting everyone to feel like a part of a family - all the better to get people to work hard, and not steal things. I guess Radio Shack doesn't have this sort of ethos.


      So that HR department was spending a huge amount of time and money lying to the employees. You may feel like you're part of a family, but you're not. Just because they're making you feel like a valued employee, doesn't mean you are.

      Every U.S. company does not care if you live or die. They provide pay and benefits in exchange for your work, and that's it. It is a cold, pitiless business transaction every single day. The first instant your employment is a net negative for the company (or a new CxO needs to bump up the stock price) you will be fired.

      If I still worked at Radio Shack, why should I give a shit about the company - and stuff like that shows.


      Why should you care about any company, when none of them care about you? I'd suggest you start to view your employment in the same cold light that your employer does. They are not your family. They are not your friends.

      Personally, I'd prefer to be fired by email rather than have a manager who barely ever knew or understood what my job was try to put on a very bad acting job as he or she pretends to comfort me as they fire me face to face. Don't pretend there were any emotional ties from the employer's side, because everyone knows (or should know) that there aren't and never will be.
    16. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      So that HR department was spending a huge amount of time and money lying to the employees. You may feel like you're part of a family, but you're not. Just because they're making you feel like a valued employee, doesn't mean you are.
       
      Companies are made up of people, and people make these decisions - you can have cases were your boss fights, I have also had this before. So sure, the company doesn't care about you because a company doesn't have feelings. But the people working there and who make decisions can have feelings, so it isn't always as bleak as you suggest (although it is often enough). Maybe you just haven't worked for any of the good companies.
       
        They are not your family. They are not your friends.
       
      Well, there are many situations were this is not true. And if you have not made any friends at work, ever, then that is sad for you.

    17. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cut the bullshit down to the absolute, positive minimum.

      I can do that in five words:

      You are an insensitive jackass.

    18. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      I used to work for the Rat Shack, too.

      I remember shortly after starting I found out about their new head quarters in Texas. It cost $700 million dollars. My first thought was, "Are you freakin' kidding me!?" Radio Shack has over 7000 stores and I'm sure they bring in a ton of money; but, that seemed a little much.

      Radio Shack also has training at least once a month at their district office. During training we would watch video's from the home office of various senior officers of the company talk about various topics. *Invariably,* their CEO would make a comment about the new $700 million dollar HQ Campus for Radio Shack. After the third or forth meeting it became apparent to me that RS isn't just proud of the new HQ, it's trying to justify its purchase to their employees and, I'm sure, their stock-holders.

      And now this. Radio Shack has, sadly, slipped in to complete chaos.

      RIP, RS.

    19. Re:How the #%$K is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I worked for a company that laid of a number of top performing employees because they "didn't make enough money for the company," even though each was bringing in a few million dollars a year, I started looking around for another job. Despite the fact that I was well entrenched in the company as a dedicated worker who was involved in a large and expensive project...my loyalty for the company was lost. Especially when most of the do-nothings managed to keep their jobs because they were "working" on large expensive projects. The company chose to do a similar line of laying folks off, and instead of giving them severance, they offered to transfer the employees to contractor status, where they would work part time or less for the company, and would sign non-compete contracts which meant they couldn't work for anyone else in their chosen field. Some took this offer, but most told the company to stick the offer where the sun doesn't shine. The company, of course, lost a significant amount of work because the folks whose projects these employees worked decided to move their money elsewhere.

      Pretty sad.

  13. CATBERT LIVES by OilWorker · · Score: 1

    Wow, so Dilbert is real... and I thought it was just a comic!

  14. Radio Shack Cuts costs by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 1

    If radio shack cuts anymore costs , what will be left?

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  15. Is this for Real? by dissillus · · Score: 0

    This seems odd, even by RadioShack's standards. Has RadioShack actually come out and said they did this? It's just seems kind of fishy...nd it reminds me of the movie Desk Set with Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn, when old IBM computers accidentally fired everyone in a massive office building.

    1. Re:Is this for Real? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1
      This seems odd, even by RadioShack's standards. Has RadioShack actually come out and said they did this? It's just seems kind of fishy...nd it reminds me of the movie Desk Set with Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn, when old IBM computers accidentally fired everyone in a massive office building.

      http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8JR1 EEO0.htm?sub=apn_tech_down&chan=tc

      Company officials had told employees in a series of meetings that layoff notices would be delivered electronically, spokeswoman Kay Jackson said. She said employees were invited to ask questions before Tuesday's notification on a company intranet site.
      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  16. Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So is this better or worse than me asking that girl out to prom over irc back in high school?

    1. Re:Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ummm... hate to break it to you, but that wasn't a girl.

    2. Re:Deja Vu by saskboy · · Score: 1

      That depends. Did she email back saying she was going out with someone who looked like Les Nesman?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Deja Vu by Durinthal · · Score: 2, Funny

      There was a girl on IRC? Since when?

    4. Re:Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be carefull the [n],[m] and [o],[0] key pairs are close together on the keyboard.

    5. Re:Deja Vu by jacquems · · Score: 1

      Bill? Is that you? (J/K... went to the prom with a nerd, but got asked in person in the computer lab, not on IRC).

  17. I'd still show up. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nothing says "e-mail what now? Must have gotten caught in my spam filter, heh..." like going into work anyway, and forcing the boss to say it to your damned face.

    1. Re:I'd still show up. by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, security wouldn't let you in the door.

      Then your boss will send you a text message:
      You've been fired. Go home.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:I'd still show up. by oclawgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      SpamAssassin could actually save your job. Alternatively, with sufficient supples of bandwidth and Mountain Dew, one of these employees ought to just do a cut & paste job on the e-pink slip (like so)... then spam the whole Radio Shack domain with it. Why not fire everyone, and score some kind of FuckedCompany record? ;-)

      --
      News Flash: Godzilla hates infrastructure.
    3. Re:I'd still show up. by dlkwnt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Somehow this feels like the best idea in this whole thread. It would probably put an end to the practice pretty quickly with a well placed public backfire.

      sorry for the pun...

    4. Re:I'd still show up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firing everyone in the company? Why stop there?

  18. Follow it up by in2mind · · Score: 5, Funny
    "The work force reduction notification is currently in progress. Unfortunately your position is one that has been eliminated."

    One of the guys who received that mail should have followed it up with a mail to everyone@radioshack :
    "Pls ignore the previous mail.It was a prank mail by someone."

    1. Re:Follow it up by BobWeiner · · Score: 1

      I nearly spit my coffee reading that. Hilarious and brilliant!

      --
      The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
  19. Tandy Dandy by Wansu · · Score: 3, Funny



    They got Radio Shafted.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  20. Weird "joke" in the intro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't you've got mail an AOL thing? What does that have to do with radio shack?

  21. Where do they get these managers? by doc_buzzard · · Score: 1

    Anyone who cannot fire an employee (any employee) face-to-face most certainly has no business being in management in the first place. Sad this happened at Radio Shack, though. I find that employees at Radio Shack are among the (very) few clerks who know anything at all about the products they are selling.

  22. How lazy were they? by Gemini_25_RB · · Score: 1

    Was Radioshack lazy enough to simply list all the fired employees as reccipients of the same email? IANAL, but I'd call that a violation of privacy. As if the violation of common courtesy wasn't enough....

    1. Re:How lazy were they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as long as you're completely inventing a speculative land of makebelieve in which the HR people couldn't figure out how to BCC, why don't you just make yourself a lawyer at the same time? You could probably get the case turned into a class action and strike it rich!

    2. Re:How lazy were they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it a violation of privacy? Someone getting fired is not generally a secret thing in a company.

  23. Hope they didn't eliminate... by tcopeland · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the TRS-80 Model I support team. I mean, after I splurged on the 16K RAM expansion and everything!

    1. Re:Hope they didn't eliminate... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      It's all been downhill since Bill Bixby died.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  24. Get some class by Aeron65432 · · Score: 1

    Honestly Radio Shack, get some class. Firing someone via e-mail is ridiculous. I had a friend who was dumped via texting. It's childish and uncalled for. A Fortune 500 company can do better.

  25. Still better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regardless, it's still better than being fired by an anonymous poster on a website.

    Speaking of which, Samzenpuss, please check for an envelope in your upper right-hand desk drawer.

    Thank you, that is all.

  26. Email? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only Radio Shack's old employees in Korea will actually know they've been laid off.

  27. Whose idea was this? by Danga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would love to know what pointy haired boss thought this was a good idea. I could not even imagine what it would be like to get fired that way, especially since it sounds like most of the people fired were not just retail workers (which would still be wrong) but were employees at the companies headquarters in Fort Worth. I am not one to hold grudges but if any of my employers were ever to do that to me after I had worked for them for years I would forever hate them and I would let them know it. In the article it said that there were meetings prior to the e-mails being sent out that explained they would be notified electronically if they were being laid off but still, that is just plain heartless and gutless. Spend the few minutes it takes and do it in person like it should be done. I hope whoever gave this the OK burns in hell.

    --
    Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    1. Re:Whose idea was this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore by validating this kind of stupidity as possible they have opened the door to a new kind of spam. So anyone running a pool on when someone is going to send a mass email with forged headers to some company with terminations to everyone on the mailing list? Perhaps even a pre-emptive strike is needed to get all companies to put it into their contracts that this will never be used at their company as a valid form of termination? Maybe should test it at Microsoft, terminate them all!

      Honestly people, using email for anything with legal ramifications is just dumb imnsho and should be outlawed, doing so might even cut down on the phishing spam. Paraphased from old memory: "The more complex a security system is, the easier it is to break." Stainless Steel Rat, Harry Harrison.

    2. Re:Whose idea was this? by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

      Probably the old guard management from Aetna.

      It was about 20 years ago that they did a layoff. Everyone in the company was required to be at there desks at a particular time and date. Those whose phone rang were laid off.

      Not sure wether I would prefer this or the e-mail.

      Or would you prefer the way Travelers did it. Laid off some people in the 70s (I know, because my Dad was one of them) and to this day tell new employees that they have never laid anyone off in their history.

    3. Re:Whose idea was this? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      See, I don't get this.

      Why the hell would you have some many spare employees laying around? Wouldn't it make more sense to slowly get rid of extraneous positions?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  28. Ridiculous by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

    There is no reason for them to do this electronically, even if the computer is used for a lot of job related things, getting layed off should not be one of them. That is just a horrible way to treat your employees.

    Radio Shack is like the convenience store of electronics stores anyway. The last time I shopped at Radio Shack all I saw were Robo Sapiens, R/C Dinosaurs, a limited selection of home entertainment equipment, a limited selection of land line phones and cell phones and a wall of misc crap. Nothing important to me because there is a crappy selection.

    Radio Shack missed the boat in my opinion. Sure they were before their time when they first opened but by now they should have moved to warehouse-sized stores because if they had played their cards right, I'm sure they could have done it and they could be making a lot more money right now.

    1. Re:Ridiculous by IvyKing · · Score: 1
      Radio Shack missed the boat in my opinion. Sure they were before their time when they first opened but by now they should have moved to warehouse-sized stores because if they had played their cards right, I'm sure they could have done it and they could be making a lot more money right now.


      They tried - ever hear of Tandy's Incredible Universe??? The one in San Diego became the first Fry's in S.D.

      For some reason "Incredible Universe" always reminded me of Michael Jackson.

    2. Re:Ridiculous by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I had never heard of Incredible Universe so I guess you're right, they did try. They must have been conducting business at those stores like they did at Radio Shack if they were so unsuccessful (high prices, no variety).

    3. Re:Ridiculous by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1
      For some reason "Incredible Universe" always reminded me of Michael Jackson.

      What, you mean they had pedophiles selling resistors? Another failed management inspiration, I fear.

  29. Severence pay by McFortner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Laid-off workers got one to three weeks pay for each year of service, up to 16 weeks for hourly employees and 36 weeks for those with base bay of at least $90,000, the company said.

    Hey, at least they are taking care of their upper management with up to 36 weeks of severence pay. Otherwise, they might have to actually give up a whole week of vacation in the Bahamas! Who cares about the nameless masses below them. That's why they are nameless masses!

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
    1. Re:Severence pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, boy. If you think $90k is the bottom rung of upper management, you are either not old enough to shave or have had a long and distinguished career at the local McDonald's.

    2. Re:Severence pay by adrianmonk · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hey, at least they are taking care of their upper management with up to 36 weeks of severence pay. Otherwise, they might have to actually give up a whole week of vacation in the Bahamas! Who cares about the nameless masses below them. That's why they are nameless masses!

      They might be nameless masses, but we know one thing for sure: each individual one of them has his very own, totally unique e-mail address.

    3. Re:Severence pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least they are taking care of their upper management with up to 36 weeks of severence pay.
       
      In an organization like radio shack the "upper management" normally gets to their possition with years of hard work and dedication. These aren't people who are hired off the street to be managers.
       
      But I guess your average slashdotter wouldn't know that... they expect everything to be handed to them since they think they know it all.
       
      Maybe you'll be in that possition someday and understand why things are done that way.

    4. Re:Severence pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Dude you might want to know that most likely the "nameless masses" are the ones being retained.

      You have to be a fairly highup "suit" to have a named email address @ radioshack.com

      These folks are the ones that 99.99944% of the business is normally done by e-mail (and anyway a commitee of 20 folks to decide what color to paint the wall in the back??.. i see 19 folks that do not need jobs with RadioShack)

  30. Re:Even better by in2mind · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or even better,remove the 'To' field of the original mail and send to everyone @ RS.

  31. HP fired me by email on Monday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I came in late and everybody was standing around excited for me to check my mail.

    Do you have a meeting? Do you have a meeting?

    Um, yeah, in 30 minutes.

    Oh man, that sucks. Only a few of us got it, and none of the boss' friends got the meeting invite. You're gone.

    They were right.

    1. Re:HP fired me by email on Monday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I came in late and everybody was standing around excited for me to check my mail."

      Nothing says "no chance of appeal" like coming in late the day you get fired...

    2. Re:HP fired me by email on Monday. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Back in the dotcom days, 3/4 of our dept got decimated by downsizing. One of the guys was on leave and heard about it through the grapevine. Surmised, through that, and management ineptitude... "12 of you are leaving." 11 of us had our bags packed, one short, and only one person absent made it quite clear. So he rang in sick, used up all his leave... made them sit on his dismissal for 8 days.

  32. Major League by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

    You know, this reminds me of what they did in Major League (the old movie with Charlie Sheen and Wesley Snipes) where they cut the try-outs by putting a red piece of tape inside their locker.

  33. If it works for dating . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then it'll work for businesses. I can't tell you how many girl friends I have who've been broken up with by email or voicemail or text, and often the other peopel don't seem to think it's inappropriate. I'm actually surprised this isn't more common.

    1. Re:If it works for dating . . . by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      No, there's a difference between people /telling/ you they don't find it inappropriate, and it BEING inappropriate. Still... Phil Collins and the divorce-by-fax (though that's exaggerated) takes the cake. ;)

      As an aside, I was one of the first people to use SMS messaging for my cell phone, rather than voice mail (ie an operator takes your call and transcribes it). Now, obviously, you couldn't lace it with obscenities... but I did give the phone to my gf's best friend who proceeded to call up and leave me a message: "Tell him he's dumped." She had to repeat it, apparently the operator was a little disbelieving, but had a sense of humour... a few moments later, I got: "Robert...

      You're dumped!"

      all nicely arranged so I had to scroll down to see the 'punchline'.

    2. Re:If it works for dating . . . by indifferent+children · · Score: 3, Funny
      divorce-by-fax

      How long until doctors just text-message the family: "The surgery seemed to be going well, but he didn't pull through. Sorry." Then the hospital can add a $2 charge for the text-message (yes that's ridiculously high for a text-message, but have you seen what they charge for an aspirin?)

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    3. Re:If it works for dating . . . by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      "As an aside, I was one of the first people to use SMS messaging for my cell phone, rather than voice mail (ie an operator takes your call and transcribes it)"

      You can do that?? please share! I hate voicemail and would love to get this feature for my cell!

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    4. Re:If it works for dating . . . by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      This is in Australia. ;) Though, ask your provider. There will most likely be an additional charge (isn't there always?)

  34. Condition of Radioshack by kasgoku · · Score: 1

    We can see where the company is headed after this event. My guess is that some other company will take over from Radioshack. I want GOOGLE to take over Radioshack. This will cause soo much agitation that even Microsoft and Apple will start to work together against the king of searches.

  35. poor radioshack by gh0ul · · Score: 1

    Poor radioshack.. If their products were better quality and better priced, and the salesmen not so pushy.. I'd probably shop there.

  36. In other news ... by in2mind · · Score: 5, Funny

    Radio Shack is now Radio Sack

    1. Re:In other news ... by gbobeck · · Score: 1
      Radio Shack is now Radio Sack

      No matter what, I will still refer to Radio Shack as Radio Shaft.

      Of course, this has nothing to do with their most recent actions (rtfa), but because I like to play with company names (examples: Subway -> Grubway, Cingular -> Suckular...).
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    2. Re:In other news ... by XO · · Score: 1

      Back in the early 90's, I was running a RadioShack store, and I come in way early one morning, and it was still pretty dark out, so I could see my neon sign outside real well.. and the top part of the left hand line on the "h" was burned out, so it looked like:

        RadioSnack

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    3. Re:In other news ... by EvilXenu · · Score: 2, Funny

      If by 'sack' you mean "genital-carrying pouch", then, yes, I'd have to agree.

  37. I could be worse by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When my co-workers were sacked by email I breathed a sigh of relief when I didn't get one. The next morning my swipe key wouldn't get me in the door. The guy I asked to reactivate my swipe key at lunch time was the one that let me know that I had lost my job.

    1. Re:I could be worse by kabocox · · Score: 1

      When my co-workers were sacked by email I breathed a sigh of relief when I didn't get one. The next morning my swipe key wouldn't get me in the door. The guy I asked to reactivate my swipe key at lunch time was the one that let me know that I had lost my job.

      This is similiar to how I got laid off from a temp job once. The individual that trained me showed up at the door when I usually got to work, and just asked for the key and said that they'd given my job to him. I thought that was a kinda odd way to do things since I was employed through a temp agency and usually the temp agency is notified and you are told by the temp agency that the contract on your position ended or something similiar. I can understand not letting former employees back in just to prevent them from taking disgruntled action. What I consider scary is that this came through e-mail. What if some worm, virus, or black hat hacker just sent out a similiar form letter from within other companies e-mail system? I'm not worried about legit firings; I'm worried out easily this could be hacked, abused, or accidently fire the wrong people. (With some managers that I know, they'd send some by the to, others by cc, and some by bcc and you'd have to read their mind to determine who the e-mail was really meant for. If I got a generic form firing letter by e-mail and it was by cc or bcc, I wouldn't consider that it was meant for me. Of course I'm the computer guy so if I need to turn off/disable an account it makes since to notify me. The problem is what if Joe MacRich CEO of FooFortune sent out a group e-mail of this to nearly random people all throughout his company. Would you take it as instructions to fire certain below you, or that yourself were personally fired by the CEO? I guess that's one way for the upper management to pick who gets fired, have the computer department print out slips of paper with every employee's name and employee number on it and have the board members play party games until the raw number of employees names were picked.

  38. I wonder... by grilled-cheese · · Score: 0

    I wonder how long someone would keep working if their pink slip got caught by the company spam filter....

  39. Tacky by localman · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine was recently fired via text message while on vacation. I thought that was pretty poor.

    Cheers.

  40. Well now I feel better. by wickedsteve · · Score: 1

    I have found new comfort in the fact that I never gave my employer my email address. I guess now I never will.

  41. Interesting considering... by PeePeeSee · · Score: 0, Informative

    That they just flew out something like 3000 managers to the MGM Grand in Vegas for a few days and even had Jay Leno doing stand up. But ya know you have to make cuts when things get tight, right?

  42. Zorg works for the RatShack? by Lactoso · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Kim: You got a message.
    Korben Dallas: Yeah.
    Mr. Kim: You're not gonna open it? It might be important.
    Korben Dallas: Yeah, like the last two I got were important. The first one was from my wife, telling me she was leaving. The second was from my lawyer, telling me he was leaving... with my wife.
    Mr. Kim: Aigh, that is bad luck. But grandfather say 'It never rain everyday'. This is good news, guaranteed. Hey, I bet your lunch.
    Korben Dallas: Okay, you're on.
    Mr. Kim: Come on. [opens message, in a excited voice] 'You are fired'. Oh, I'm sorry.
    Korben Dallas: At least I won lunch.
    Mr. Kim: Good philosophy, see good in bad, I like.

  43. Editors by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    Dear Slashot Editors, The work force reduction notification is currently in progress. Unfortunately your position is one that has been eliminated. Enjoy the rest of your day, Management. (I jest, I jest.)

  44. So did they digitally sign the emails? by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    Or do they expect their employees to carefully inspect the SMTP headers to make sure it's not a forgery?

    Or does Radio Shack management just not understand technology?

    Oh, never mind, I get it.

  45. Yet they are having weekly job fairs! by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

    Someone must be trying desperatly to keep their job. RadioShack is having WEEKLY job fairs advertising that they are hiring! If they would just fire the moron who is waisting resources on interviewing people for jobs when there are none, they could have kept at least 50 of those positions!!!

  46. Lost Verizon contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I heard a rumor from what appeared to be a reliable source that Radio Shack had to close a bunch of stores because they lost their contract with Verizon. Apparently cell phone sales were carrying the stores.

    1. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by indifferent+children · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you hear me now? Good. You're fired! Can you hear me now? Good. You're fired!

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    2. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by pete6677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did Radio Shack's (mis)management really think that they could sustain, let alone grow, their national chain just by being a cellphone reseller? Every cellphone provider has company stores now, and soon every town will have one. Which means they have every incentive to cut resellers and their commissions out of the picture. Once Radio Shack has nothing to fall back on besides substandard and overpriced electronics, its liquidation time.

    3. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by accelleron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Makes sense. Per capita, what is someone more likely to need, a new cell phone accessory or a breadboard?

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    4. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The breadboard.

      It's extremely unlikely that someone is going to be buying a breadboard unless they have a specific purpose for it. On the other hand, cellphone accessories are almost exlusively silly little chotchkis and, thus, are more likely to be purchased on a whim, not because there's any need for it.

    5. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by sysinu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm surprised that the email spammers weren't all over this one. All you'd need to do is find out what email addy those emails were sent out from... and then dictionary spam the radioshack email addy's with that message. In Current News... 90% of radioshack employees did not show up for work today as they all thought they were fired. lol gg.

    6. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sigh...I remember when I was five or six. I'd go to Radio shack and get my grandfather to buy half the items on the shelf, including four or five breadboards.

      Then I'd go home, and plug things together until I had odd little circuits. Most of them didn't work, but some of them did. And some of them surprised me. I remember taking a tuning knob out of a CB and stuffed it into a breadboard. I didn't really expect the circuit to work; I just wanted to see a tuning knob sticking out of a breadboard. I was shocked when the speaker made rhythmic clicking sounds.

      Yes, my favorite movie at the time was Short Circuit. But I chose my CB handle at the time (and then my BBS handle, and then my Slashdot handle) based on my interest in electronics.

      My first exposure to electronics was a Radioshack children's kit, the Robot20. Then I upgraded to their 200 kit, and then the 300.

      Ah...memories.

    7. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, unfortunately they're still the only place to go to for certain specialized electronics bits and pieces that aren't quite so specialized that you have to order them over the internet.

      can't say I've ever been happy with their prices or service, though.

      At least they stopped forcing people to hand over their phone number just to purchase an RCA cable, though.

    8. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by mfrank · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just gave them the last fake phone number a girl gave to me.

    9. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      http://www.mouser.com/

      Please, please please don't go to radio shack. Their product quality is crap, their prices are rediculous, and their selection is terrible. I've been using Mouser for years as a hobbyist. While their low volume or single unit prices aren't the best around, they're still very reasonable. Their service is incredible, shipping is prompt, and they have a mind-boggling inventory of even the most obscure parts. I'm sure others like Mouser exist, but that's merely one example of a company that can completely replace any need for radio shack.

      If you take away their electronic components aisle, what else do they sell that you can't get for better/cheaper/faster elsewhere?

      Note: Call it what you will, but I don't work for this company.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    10. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Mouser.com is great, but sometimes I want, say, a 1/4" connector *now*, not in three days...but, such is the nature of online shopping

      If you take away their electronic components aisle, what else do they sell that you can't get for better/cheaper/faster elsewhere?

      absolutely nothing...I have to agree with you there.

    11. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by andreyw · · Score: 1

      In that case, Rat Shack is still a terrible place to go.

      Simply because.... they're likely not to even HAVE what you're looking for.

      For example: the local Rat Shack in Elgin, IL seems to concentrate on selling cheap, shitty, electronic gadgets, mostly made by no-known-brand companies. They also sell cell phones, crappy A/V equipment, overpriced cables (thaaanks, I think I'll just crimp my own, or buy 10 online for $1), and an assortment of oddball "parts" for computers, like... oh.... internal serial ports for old AT-style mobos, CPU fans, etc.

      Ah, and of course, they have some shelves dedicated for "electronics".... which mostly implies LEDs, screw nuts, wires, the oddball CMOS equivalents of TTL logic (and they seem to be pretty random about choices too - sure, we'll sell you buffers, but not AND gates, or OR gates... or whatever), and oddball IC (like a 30-second audio recorder). Somehow, everytime I wanted to buy some analog components like resistors or caps, they ended up not having what I was looking for (thankfully, plenty of broken VCRs and CRTs home to desolder).

    12. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Losing the contract with Verizon had nothing to do with the recent store closures. They changed over to Cingular, which is just as easy and profitable to sell. They did close a whole bunch of stores because they weren't making money keeping them open in the first place.

    13. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Informative

      No.

      Radio Shack had to close a bunch of stores because they alienated their core customer (folks who need electronic components, oddball gadgets, tools, etc.) and tried to become a mini-but-high-proced Circuit City botique carrying only low-end crap components priced at mid-range prices, not even the mid-range components you can get at Circuit City or Best Buy.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    14. Re:Lost Verizon contract? by Nakarti · · Score: 1

      Except that, like many corporations, Radio Shack uses an internal WAN with a special message system that is treated like email, but from my view of it working at a franchise, isn't really email, and definitely isn't accessible from the Intarweb.

  47. just the beginning by noneme · · Score: 1

    next thing you know they'll SFTP a red swingline stapler away from the wrong guy and the whole mail server will mysteriously go up in flames a day later.

  48. Big problem with that... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    At least where I live...

    If an employer did that here, they'd find themselves in a bit of a pickle with those employees that didn't happen to get the message before coming back to work the next day.

    And they'd be legally _required_ to pay them for coming to work!!! (this is on top of any appropriate severence package that they are eligible for).

    Well, not for the full day. Where I live, the legal minimum is 3 hours. But still... that could add up, if enough people didn't collect the message before showing up for work.

    You discharge an employee in person. Always. Unless you want to risk owing even more money.

  49. What could possibly go wrong firing by e-mail? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing that no one at Radio Shack has any technical skill or understands the Internet. Otherwise, someone who worked there and resents this happening this way might forge an e-mail header and fire everyone that didn't get the first e-mail. Not that I'm advocationg that, because that would be wrong.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  50. Oh, and P.S. by PizzaFace · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you need any batteries today?

    1. Re:Oh, and P.S. by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Would you like a cell phone with that?

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  51. Actually This Is A Good Thing by MCTFB · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The firing of employees by email is just another way to automate away just another management function. If people find it acceptable to be fired by an email, rather than a face to face meeting with a manager, then this means we are just one more step to automating away most of management in company decision making. Anything that eliminates the jobs of useless corporate butt munchers who are adept at convincing their superiors they are valued exployees in the company with "people skills" is not just a good thing, but a great thing.

    This means that eventually expert systems and other AI based systems will execute all firings in a fair and objective fashion. If you fail to meet your quotas, the "Virtual CEO 9000" will fire you with a nice little trite email. If you meet your quotas, then the "Virtual CEO 9000" may indeed give you a raise. No performance review will ever again be necessary where you have to interview for keeping your own job every year through kissing up to your former human manager, rather the "Virtual CEO 9000" will instead be constantly evaluating your usefulness to the corporation in real-time and compensate you objectively.

    Just imagine what this would do for a company like Oracle that has about 10 maybe 11 engineers doing all the real work in the company with about 50,000 managers whose idea of work is schmoozing with other like-minded individuals on a golf course all day long. The "Virtual CEO 9000" could cut out so much bloat that profits would go so through the roof that Larry Ellison could pay down the entire United States national debt of 65 trillion dollars or whatever it happens to be right now.

    Seriously, I have not figured out why the board of directors at our largest corporations has not already outsourced or automated away executive management yet, when they happen to be the least efficient and least accountable group of people in your typical corporation these days. The "Virtual CEO 9000" doesn't need stock options to the tune of 400 million dollars like one of Exxon's former CEO's, instead it just needs some electricity to make the kind of decisions that your typical corporate bean counter makes based solely upon some Microsoft Excel spreadsheet calculation where they say "AHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA THERE IS THE FAT WE NEED TO CUT. THAT DARNED IT DEPARTMENT IS NOT SELLING ANYTHING AND INSTEAD IS JUST COSTING US A LOT OF MONEY, LET'S FIRE SOME EXPLOYEES AND SLASH THEIR BUDGET!".

    Oh wait, I forgot that modern corporations usually have a board of directors that also just happens to be personal friends of the executive management they are supposed to be directing. Nevertheless, my point still stands that being managed by a cold, unfeeling, computer application like the "Virtual CEO 9000" is still better than being managed by the sociopaths that typically run our public companies today.

    1. Re:Actually This Is A Good Thing by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      Why the hell is this rated +2 insightful? Has socity sunk to such inhumane levels that this kind of crap is expected? What are you mods thinking? Losing a job in the 90's was judged to be as stressful as the death of a parent or a divorce. I guess now that we (you) have accepted McJobs as a norm. Now this kind of corporate bullshit will only increase. I say RISE UP, refuse to buy radio shaft crap ( and it has always been crap ).
      But, Then you will be only hurting the cow-orkers left. Corporate asshats will just move on to the next ripe playing field.
      Next time you're on the road, and you see a late model BMW or Lexus, Just shove that bastard into a bridge abuttment with your tarus.
      Cheers!
      My capcha was GAUCHE (ha ha)

    2. Re:Actually This Is A Good Thing by joto · · Score: 1

      Losing a job in the 90's was judged to be as stressful as the death of a parent or a divorce.

      Hah! Who even cares about that anymore? I've lost hundreds of parents, and I didn't even care the first time! They were old, they were annoying, they smelled bad, couldn't remember a thing, and constantly demanded my help with the simplest thing. They're quite frankly better off dead.

      If you are getting a divorce, good for you! Most of Hollywoods celebrities has at least three! Marriage is the celebration of a couple getting together. Divorce should be the celebration of two people getting on each others nerves finally not needing to have anything to do with eachother anymore. Go fuck somebody else!

      I guess now that we (you) have accepted McJobs as a norm. Now this kind of corporate bullshit will only increase.

      Good. There is only one thing I hate more than having to work for money. And that is responsibility. It doesn't pay more, and it takes away from my free time. Besides, if the employer is able to fire me with no warning, I can walk with no warning. I've done this at times, leaving a bombed out trail of chaos as every project involving me goes to hell, unless they decide to hire me as a consultant, which I won't do, since I'm off for vacation. It's not my fault the corporate bozos are bad at planning!

    3. Re:Actually This Is A Good Thing by mqj · · Score: 1

      The firing of employees by email is just another way to automate away just another management function.

      nothing like the good old
      "Go away before I replace you with a very small shell script."

    4. Re:Actually This Is A Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...like flying airplane into buildings. Just like getting a SUV full of diesel fuel and ammonium nitrate put that in front your house and lighting the fuse.
      The more in-personal this process gets the more easier for management to screw you. It is in-personal behavior that is driving this stupidity. Management is acting like this is a video game and there are no consequence to their actions. In managements mind blow up and destorying people is fun. This email method is great for them since you have rebuttal.

  52. Radio Shack Sucks by Cheirdal · · Score: 1

    I had temp seasonal job with Radio Shaft back in 1991. The weasels waited until the very last minute to give us our checks on X-mas eve so we wouldn't have time to cash them. The seasonal help was told before X-mas we'd be working through New Years Eve that year. My manager knew I had a 300 mile drive each way to go home for the holidays. I decided I'd rather spend time with my family and girlfriend so I called in sick on the day after Christmas. My manager said "Oh, we weren't allowed to tell the seasonal people but this was going to be your last day anyway." So the assholes would have let me drive 300 miles Christmas evening so I could work the next day and then they'd have let me go. They're truly a heinous company that shits on their employees. I haven't bought one thing from them since 1991 and I've urged friends and family over the years to not give them any business. I don't know if I've actually cost them very much in the long run, but every little bit helps squeeze them closer to bankruptcy.

  53. not suprised by xystren · · Score: 1

    I received my notice that my position was not going to be renewed (after countless promises that it would be) via email, back in 1997... They even had the gall to request that I schedule my time, to train my replacement.

    Talk about a kick in the pants. Very deflating.

    But, I'm *NOT* bitter! This is just going to become more common. The same way that a PFO (please f*#k off) letters are rarely sent out nowadays.

    Xyst

    1. Re:not suprised by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      when a company shits on you and asks you to train a replacement.... "overlook" a few very important pieces of training

      preferably relatively infrequent but costly if screwed up things or things which are in fact contrary to documentation. forget to mention bugs in the computer system and how to work around them, omit instructions that machine X needs to be rebooted every 30 days, stuff like that

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:not suprised by xystren · · Score: 1

      been there, did that..

      nothing felt better than them calling me back asking about some issues. It felt really good telling them that I'm now an contractor and I get paid what I'm worth now (which is 3.5x what you paid me). Those are my rates, minimum one day (8 hours.)

      Needless to say, they were pissed off, and asked about the loyality they deserved for the previous two years they had given me. I just laughed, and said "2 years of empty promises for a permanent position? What about those two years of loyality from me, only to be notified that I won't be getting that permanent position I was promised time and time again? And worst off, you didn't have the balls to tell me to my face, and you gave me notice via email? Hell now that I'm thinking about it, I think my rates just went up for your site...

      It was nice getting 8 hours with of pay for a 5 minute fix. And the real kicker for them? It was in the documentation I did up. They just chose not to read it.

      Payback is a bitch

      Cheers,
      Xyst

  54. It's Suzy Meier all over again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, my ex-work life and ex-dating life have finally achieved syncronicity.

    Before it was just lots of electronic devices...

  55. Unless you had a scheduled appointment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which I did. :-)

    But you're absolutely right. One of the guys that we knew was due to get hit was the one that was late EVERY day.

  56. Saving $ or Cowards? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Honestly Radio Shack, get some class.

    I have to agree. That approach is utterly cowardly. On the practical side from the company's perspective, unemployed people have a lot of time to plot revenge pranks and expose's. Plus, the lasting ill-will will harm the reputation of the company (further).

    Were they trying to save a buck, or simply too chicken to face people? If the latter, they don't belong in management.

  57. This is nothing new... by dbc · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the early 80's I was a CPU designer at a large mainframe company that was going through waves of RIF's. All layoff's always happened on Friday, and the sysadmins were always given a list of userid's to disable before hand. So, it became a regular Friday morning ritual for everyone to get a cup of joe, joke about whether their login would work, and see if they could get on the system. An officemate typed his password incorrectly one Friday and nearly crapped. Most victims had their desk half cleaned out before their manager found them.

    Heck, at least these people got an e-mail.

    1. Re:This is nothing new... by zettabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was laid off via an email back in aught-three, albeit inadvertently.

      I had sent an email to a client in which I had CC'd my boss-man (the owner). He replied to the client with, "Please send all future correspondance on this subject to me." Not being in full control of his email client, I was included in the recipient list.

      The next morning was quite entertaining. I ended up coaching him through how to publicize the layoffs to the remaining staff. It makes for a good story. Now.

  58. Why would that matter? by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    I have found new comfort in the fact that I never gave my employer my email address. I guess now I never will.

    If they're going to e-fire you, you're still fired, whether you receive the email message from them or not.

    Actually, I'm more curious about why you don't give your employer your email address? I'd have never given it a second thought. Why would you not want your employer to be able to communicate with you via email? They already have your snail mail address, bank account info, and SSN. What is the advantage of not giving them your email address?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Why would that matter? by gbobeck · · Score: 1
      They already have your snail mail address, bank account info, and SSN. What is the advantage of not giving them your email address?

      <sarcasm>
      Maybe it is the illusion of privacy.

      Or could it be the relative comfort of knowing that their employer doesn't know that their email address is captsparkypants@example.com or some other silly address?
      </sarcasm>
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  59. The second coming/rapture will be by email by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Welcome to the Right-Wing Hell. People vote for them because they hope for enforcement of "social values". However, they have been railroaded by Inc.

  60. Another email for the others? by tdc_vga · · Score: 1

    In another comment someone suggested replying to all of them with "Sorry, that was a a joke." I think it would be better to email the 400 people not laid off with "The work force reduction notification is currently in progress. Unfortunately your position is one that has been eliminated." Might teach them a lesson to do things face to face. Cheers.

  61. The next spam by cheros · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, if that is now really legally acceptable I know what's going to happen next, expect a new type of spam, the 'sack' spam. That also has the effect ot training your spam filter so you'll never receive the real one. As a matter of fact, it probably pretty much nukes this for the next time it's attempted.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  62. email is a bad way to fire people. by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But not for the reasons you might think. The natural reaction is that it's too impersonal. That's really the least of the problems. The big problem with email is that it's not reliable, and not very official. What's to stop someone sending out a prank notice to non-fired rad-shack employees that says they're fired? Maybe you don't like the rad-shack guy you work with (and you've already been fired), so you send out a fake email to him with headers that look like it comes from rad-shack and the same body as yours. How's your (former) co-worker going to know he wasn't actually fired?

    Email isn't reliable either. There's no guarantee that people read their email on a regular basis, and even if they did spam filters can filter out an email like this.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:email is a bad way to fire people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And extending your idea, it could be possible to send such prank e-mail to ALL the non-manager employees and cause the whole bussiness to stop working for a few days.

    2. Re:email is a bad way to fire people. by jimicus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Alternatively you could send it to all managers and watch productivity shoot through the roof.

  63. That's okay because... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a guy from an African nation in the very next message promised to give me a new job if I help him with an international transaction.

  64. Obligatory by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    Peter Gibbons: You're gonna lay off Samir and Michael?
    Bob Slydell: Oh yeah, we're bring in some entry-level graduates, farm some work out to Singapore, that's the usual deal.
    Bob Porter: Standard operating procedure.
    Peter Gibbons: Do they know this yet?
    Bob Slydell: No. No, of course not. We find it's always better to fire people on a Friday. Studies have statistically shown that there's less chance of an incident if you do it at the end of the week.

    Office Space

  65. They can kiss my Uranus by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They also sent Pluto a notice that it's longer classified as a planet. Poor Pluto does not even know because it will take 9 years to get there.

    1. Re:They can kiss my Uranus by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Pluto is not 9 light years away.

      Hell, you could send a message to Riker's home planet -- and receive a reply -- in 9 years. And that's WITHOUT using the subspace array!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  66. Let it be known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for Radio shack in the early eighties before Christmas. They never told me it was a "temporary christmas job" and fired the day after Christmas. My manager never told it to my face, and it was another manger that told me.

    Radio Shack treats their employees as disposable, possibly worse than even fast-food joints. Also, they have an in-house psychological test that they will try to profile you with.

    Salsespeople who worked in malls did ok, but those who worked in strip malls (as I did) never were able to make much more than minimum wage even before Christmas.

    I see that they really haven't changed any after all these years. I'm glad that I no longer have to shop there.

  67. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    db = SQLite3::Database.new('radio_shack.db')
    db.execute('SELECT id,email FROM employees WHERE sales 100') { |employee|
            email(employee[1], 'You're fired...lolz.')
            db.execute("DELETE from employees WHERE id=#{employee[0]}")
    }

    puts 'Done.'

  68. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by madbawa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It happens only in America. American corporates are a bunch of ingrates. The work culture sucks. There is no humanity, no love and no warmth. All the 'Hi, how you doin', 'Hi, how are you today?', 'So nice to see you again' and other phrases of warmth and caring are all feigned. No one really cares a shit about how you are today. All they know is that this company is not doing well, I need to search for sheep I can shear.
    An example from the health care scene: I know a child with a respiratory disorder that had to wait for 2 months just to get a bed. After getting the bed, the child survived only for a day. Its really sad how cold we have become in the pursuit for money and power. We have forgotten how peoples lives get affected by our decisions. There are countless people who are such dedicated workers, people who genuinely care about the company they work in, people who suffer silently when their dedication and committment is met with a terse email saying 'Piss off dawg, we don't need you no more'.
    Is it any wonder then that stuff gets outsourced to destinations like India? And that more and more workers are coming from America to work in India?

  69. I'm a former shacker and NOT surprised by CFD339 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My experience with them is from 18 years ago, but the organizational style rings true.

    I found this organization to be utterly classless, morally bankrupt, and totally incompetent. The sole exception to this was that INDIVIDUAL store managers and a couple of reginal guys were fantastic sales people and had solid retail skills. The entire corporate profile is designed to mass produce cheap crap and sell it at a huge margin, sucking every ounce of effort and creativity from the few good sales kids and retail level managers who give huge efforts to eek out a poor living.

    The times I was in Ft. Worth for one reason or another the level of waste and incompetance was stunning to behold.

    -- Please forgive the poor spelling and typos. I'm typing on a small keyboard and have limited editing here.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:I'm a former shacker and NOT surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree.

      I work for a cell phone company (starts with Kyo****) and we contracted out all the warranty work to Radio Shack and customers are suppose to bring their phones to RS locations and then they would send the phones to Ft. Worth, TX for repairs.

      We had tons of problems where stores won't take the phone no matter what (we have a contract with them) and repair people would lie to us everyday about status of repairs etc.

      Official quote for turn around time is 7-10 business days but it's not unusual for customer's phone to be in Ft. Worth TX for 2months+ and send it back afterwards with no repair done at all.

      Truly a seedy company, I hope someone at SSSI/Radio Shack in Ft. Worth TX got fired, they are nothing but liars and cheats.

    2. Re:I'm a former shacker and NOT surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- Please forgive the poor spelling and typos. I'm typing on a small keyboard and have limited editing here.

      Lemme guess, it's a trash-80 model 100

      --I worked for them 23 years ago. They were crappy employers back then. You're right, nothing has changed.

    3. Re:I'm a former shacker and NOT surprised by JakartaDean · · Score: 1
      found this organization to be utterly classless, morally bankrupt, and totally incompetent. The sole exception to this was that INDIVIDUAL store managers and a couple of reginal guys were fantastic sales people and had solid retail skills.
      I think you've hit on something important here. While this may or may not be characteristic of Radio Shack's corporate culture (it might be based on the few times I've wandered in one), I suspect what you're seeing is an ill-advised effort by an HR Manager, without the knowledge of the senior management. RIFs are fairly commonplace these days, and I can certainly imagine an HR management type given the responsibility for something of this size.

      Of course, if it really is corporate policy, they're even worse than I could have imagined.

      BTW, I'm an HR Management Consultant.
      --
      The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
  70. Squeeze 'em out by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, what might work with the cubicle set would be to put an opposing two of their partition walls on motorised rails, linked to a database that moved them inward when their quotas went down, and outward when they went up. Give them inflatable chairs, too -- so when the walls move in too close, you can fire them directly through the roof.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  71. Similar thing happened in this case. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The management was so inept, they sent the email meeting "invite" out late on Friday. Well late for them.

    Several people were still in the office, so they went over and asked why one guy got it and the other didn't.

    Completely wrecked the guy's weekend. He came in to the meeting on Monday late, and wasted.

  72. Not surprised by JewGold · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a former long-time employee at RS, let me just say this news comes as absolutely no surprise.

    Their entire management structure is irrepairably flawed. Most of their top guys were promoted from store-level positions with absolutely no formal training on how to run a fortune 500 corporation. These 'executives' know only how to lead through threats, intimidation, and constant turnover.

    In the 1980s and early 90s, they went from being one of the largest and most respected computer manufacturers (Tandy) to almost zero computer sales. In 1990, there was a RadioShack store in every neighborhood, yet they completely missed the boat on the Internet boom. In about 2000 they happened to be in the right place at the right time and lucked into the cell phone boom, hence their good stock performance during this time. They soon (within months) screwed that up and their stock fell to a third of its former value almost overnight.

    Now they've been doing nothing new, with the exception of several scandals involving their former CEO, Dave Edmonson. I'd imaging their long term strategory at this point is simply circling the drain long enough for some conglomerate to buy their name at a firesale price for use in some branding strategy

    --
    Is this a news report or a trailer for a motion picture?
    1. Re:Not surprised by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In the 1980s and early 90s, they went from being one of the largest and most respected computer manufacturers (Tandy)

      One of the largest? Sure. One of the most respected? No way. Why did we call it a Trash-80?

      RS was known for selling substandard computers and parts all along... we knew, but accepted it because they were so cheap. Kind of like a Yugo.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Not surprised by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Now they've been doing nothing new, with the exception of several scandals involving their former CEO, Dave Edmonson. I'd imaging their long term strategory at this point is simply circling the drain long enough for some conglomerate to buy their name at a firesale price for use in some branding strategy

      It's been awhile since I've been in a Radio shack, but I think some one should buy the company or turn it around. Radioshack has tons of stores that are individually pretty well run. I'm not thrilled with their website, but for quick some purchases RadioShack used to rock. Of course, we always got that off the wall electronic toy at Radio Shack and not any of their radio or computer equipment.

  73. In Soviet... by denoir · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Russia you fire away emails, in Soviet Radio Shack email fires you!

  74. Re:HP _did not_ fire you by email on Monday. by pwagland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They asked you to a meeting. That is a reasonable, and professional course of action to take. People get laid off, sometimes for good reasons, sometimes for bad. The real problem with the article is not that some people were laid off, but that they were told by e-mail not to bother coming in anymore. HP at least gave you the courtesy of a face to face.

  75. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, more like: "Hey, here's 16+ weeks of free pay, have fun".

    Is Radio Shack really that good of a job?

  76. eboycott by memaul8 · · Score: 1

    Well if they can efire we can eboycott. Not that it makes adiffernce, but it;s just one more place not to go besides walmart

  77. HA HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have the rejection letter from Radio Shack. I hung it on my wall as a point of pride because basicly it says "you are not radio shack material". Priceless. I now have a job that is about a million times better than the radio shack job and um.. I didn't get fired by email today!

    Sorry for those who did tho...

  78. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    "And that more and more workers are coming from America to work in India?"

    Yes, America is literally hemorrhaging population to the third world as people seek opportunity... are you for real?

    Most companies would not do this - the very fact that it rates as news should clue you in to this. Don't pick out random news items and try to establish a trend.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  79. Wow, that sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought getting axed by fax was bad... Thanksgiving day...

    The facts of the fax was I worked for a Japanese company that wasn't up to speed on U.S. holidays beyond Christmas and had it been known, they wouldn't have done what they did. Once they came to realize what had happened, they offered to rehire and then re-terminate me after New Years. I suggested they simply add a month onto the severance package and so it was done.

    This happened about ten years ago and I not only received a personally signed Christmas card that year, but every year since. Oh... and company calendars too.

    While it was a shock to the system, I simply got back on the horse after a suitable time for mourning and now I hope the cards and calendars continue since it's nice to be remembered having made many friends during my time there.

    Or maybe someone simply forgot to take my name off the list ...

  80. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by aebrain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    it happens only in America

    Nope.

    One time, I was 1 week into a 3-month posting in Europe, and I got an e-mail from Australia telling me my 3-month notice period started immediately. I had to work through it of course. I was paid out the 4 weeks of vacation I'd accumulated, but lost the hundreds of hours of time-off-in-lieu. I'd been with the firm 8 years.

    Trying to find a new job when you're 10,000 miles away from home isn't easy. And of course the customer, who had paid $$$ for my services, was not pleased, they wanted me to stay longer and work on other stuff.

    Yes, I should have taken the time off in lieu, but that would have been cheating the customer. There's such a thing as professional ethics.

    I took the firm to industrial arbitration, won, but the legal fees ate up nearly all of the 3 months pay I got.

    --
    Zoe Brain - Rocket Scientist
  81. Hi, welcome to the wonderful world of .. by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

    satire!

    Yes, where a person makes a point about a situation by writing something that often takes the situation to an extreme.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  82. Another science fiction prediction comes true by smcleish · · Score: 1
    I don't know if this is the first time a group of workers has been laid off by email quite so brusquely, but it's something Frank Herbert (of Dune) had happen in his seventies novel The Dosadi Experiment. From memory, it goes something like:

    Keila's terminal showed a new message, coded 9BPRW. She smiled. Good old 9BPRW - bad news develops its own standard features. She opened the message:

    The Demopol has determined that some posts are surplus to requirements. If your job title following this message is underlined, you are hereby terminated.

    • Senior Liator


    (She's pleased about it because she hacked the system to sack her - part of a complicated plan to take over the world.)
    --
    You can rent this space for $5 a week.
  83. Don't be so Victorian and naive! by fantomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Common decency" ... hmm, maybe exists in some 50s romantic B-movie comedies, but alas, welcome to the real world pal. That stuff never existed. Read your histories of work and industry through the ages. Watch a few Monty Python sketches if that's too boring (something about working in coal mines and getting up at 5am and being grateful for it: Victorian decency didn't have a problem with sending 5 year olds down mines and up chimneys after all). That's why unions got going in the first place, to actually give the little guys some real power rather than having individuals just sitting at home feeling shocked after layoff at the wake up call that they weren't actually working for a paternalistic social enterprise.

    If you don't like the word 'union' then pick another, but you need some sort of collective ability to organise and respond when the big guys put the pressure on. They screw around with your workmates, you all stop work and threaten to take the company down if they don't start behaving better. Drastic, sure, but the USA is *proud* of its free market hire em and fire em attitude, you aren't going to get some middle manager to change their way by asking them to remember the unwritten rules of Lord's cricket ground and the British Raj. They are watching over their shoulder as well...

    1. Re:Don't be so Victorian and naive! by sydb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's funny, the OP didn't say or even hint at anything about Victorian values or the Empire yet your argument is that it's naive to hark back to those days. Maybe your fighting some kind of inner conflict. Common decency is actually fairly, well, common, because contrary to popular belief, some managers are human too.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    2. Re:Don't be so Victorian and naive! by Dobeln · · Score: 1

      Now, I can guarantee you that life in Victorian times would have been even shittier if they would have dropped their "common decency", etc.

  84. you must be kidding by oohshiny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The news in this is that we've reached that particular point in our society where a corporation doesn't even have to have the common decency to fire people in person.

    What kind of phantasy world do you live in? Labor rights and relations have come a long way since the 19th centuries; companies didn't use to fire employees by E-mail, they used to work them to death and kill them.

    You're confusing a company with a thinking, feeling person. Companies are like big, impersonal machines, and they have always been. Complaining about being fired by E-mail makes just about as much sense as taking the BSOD or a washing machine malfunction as a personal insult. The company doesn't want you anymore, so just move on. If people get fired too often in your opinion, then the solution is to fix the system (by working for more labor rights), not to whine about the form in which you get fired.

    1. Re:you must be kidding by jimmydevice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Corporations are PEOPLE, just like soylent green. Some "associate / analyst / economist" up the line, looking at a spreadsheet, maxing the bottom line for profit decided to fire your sorry ass. Kill them. No machine has ever fired anybody. Just People. It's all the stock market and the mantra that the investors come first. Get rid of that gaming hall and employment and the world economy might settle down. Just restrict trades to hold for a one year period and the thrashing profit machine will be shut down. JimD. The above statements are pure fantasy but will be implemented during the coming food riots.

    2. Re:you must be kidding by Bobosan · · Score: 1

      Somewhere in the world, millions of kids are pondering 'what is Soylent Green?'

    3. Re:you must be kidding by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      It's people. Soylent Green is made out of people. They're making our food out of people. Next thing they'll be breeding us like cattle for food. You've gotta tell them. You've gotta tell them!

      Sorry, but there was no way in hell I could keep from posting that the one time it ever will be a vaguely on-topic response.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    4. Re:you must be kidding by oohshiny · · Score: 1

      Corporations are PEOPLE, just like soylent green.

      Corporations are legal entities, not people, and they lack most of the characteristics that people have, like a sense of responsibility, morals, or mortality.

      Some "associate / analyst / economist" up the line, looking at a spreadsheet, maxing the bottom line for profit decided to fire your sorry ass.Just People. It's all the stock market and the mantra that the investors come first.

      It's their responsibility to maximize profit; they don't have a choice in the matter. If they decide to keep people on without justification, they are guilty of fraud.

      And who do you think are those "investors"? It's you and it's me: it's our 401k's, our retirement funds, and our bank deposits.

      Now, you can say that the system we set up is stupid, and I'd be willing to agree to some degree. But you can't blame "them" for it because there is no "them": this is your system and my system, and we decide to keep it up every time we go to the ballot box. If you want to get rid of corporations as we know it, get politically active and start beating the drums for other political candidates. You're the guilty party, not "them".

    5. Re:you must be kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What kind of phantasy world do you live in? Labor rights and relations have come a long way since the 19th centuries; companies didn't use to fire employees by E-mail, they used to work them to death and kill them.
      "Used to"? Yeah. Right. You are one retarded cock sucker.
    6. Re:you must be kidding by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your reasoning. While a corporation can "do" things, it is not an entity that in reality "decides" things (though legally this may be true). People decide things, even if the corporation is the body that enacts those decisions. Someone, or a collection of someones, decided that this was a good idea. There are people behind this decision, and it was a human who inked the signature on the memo, or pressed the enter key to make this a policy.

      Take the thinking, feeling people out of a company, and you're left with bricks and paper, which last time I checked have never made a decision to fire anyone.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  85. Does it really matter _HOW_ it's done? by R-2-RO · · Score: 1

    It's never nice no matter how it's done.

    Heck, I had ye old axe dropped on me in Nov '05 by an HR manager(director?) as if that matters. He only had the job for ~ 3 weeks. We had no HR department before that! LOL

    So he was there all of 3 weeks and gave me a firm handshake and said something like "*we* want to thank you for you years of service" blah blah I was cracking up inside and screaming "You've been here all of 3 weeks!! How can YOU be thanking me for my years of service?! bwahahaha! Ok, I was alternating between cracking up inside and thinking WTF?! ;)

    --
    Thank you. Drive through. (:wq)
  86. What a sociopathic view... by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Congrats, you should be a manager, maybe even a board member or CEO, if your view of the world is that sociopathic.

    Human interactions are not measured just in how many dollars they make for your (or their) bottom line. Sometimes you can take 5 minutes off your busy schedule just, you know, for the sake of making someone's day less shitty. Just because it's the humane thing to do. Someone has just been fired, and it won't kill you to just say a few soothing words and show (or fake) some compassion. Or just show that someone at least remembers their name, or that they worked there. Put a human/humane face on the whole deal, you know.

    Yes, being fired is just normal and just part of how the economy works. It's not the end of the world. Etc. But it's still a stressful event in someone's life. It won't kill you to lower someone's stress a little.

    It's also an awakening to the cruel reality that, for all the bullshit "we're all a big family" speeches, you're just a nameless disposable cog in the corporate machine. A cog that's served its purpose, produced all the profit that could be made, and now is disposed of when no longer profitable. All the "we're all a big family" idea not only flies out the window, but it turns out that it's never been true anyway. That's not how families work.

    And that's not a cheerful thought. Humans aren't robots, and the millions of years of evolution have sorta hard-wired us to be social beings. Our brains are wired for person-to-person relations, not for a nameless-cog-to-faceless-entity existence. That's too why we build father figures in the sky (i.e., religion), or conspiracy theories with a few people responsible for all this or that, or anthropomorphise our computer/boat/gun/whatever. Because that's the kind of thing we're wired for, and the kind of thing we understand: _people_, not faceless machineries.

    And the kind of email oozing an "you're one of the nameless drones we're discarding today" tone, like these people received, only serve to amplify that to the maximum impact possible. It's just twisting the knife in the wound. In the ammo arsenal of unpleasant human interactions, this is the dum-dum.

    And if you're willing to advocate that just because the humane alternative is "just a total logistical nightmare"... well, as I was saying, you have some serious upper management potential.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:What a sociopathic view... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how families work.

      Obviously, you're not in my family.

    2. Re:What a sociopathic view... by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Funny
      Obviously, you're not in my family.


      Heh... I can just see it now.

      "Son, I called you here to tell you that, after a long and mature discussion with your mom, we decided that we no longer need you and your sister. With the economic downturn and all, we have to trim the unneeded fat and cut down on the unnecessary expenses. I'm sure that you'll understand the little work that you occasionally do around the house is hardly justifying the expenses of feeding and clothing two children. Maybe we could keep one, but not two.

      "So instead of you two, we're outsourcing your job to a chinese kid. As I'm sure you've heard, not only they work cheaper down there, but unlike you American kids, they take school seriously and have skills that you and your sister will likely never have. While you two only ever used school as an excuse to run amok and learn nothing, the chinese kid we found has straight A grades and runs his own gold farming business in his spare time. Whatever gold farming means. That's the kind of initiative and entrepreneurial spirit that, sad to say, is also lacking in America's youth these days. And it's certainly not the kind of spirit that you and your sister ever showed.

      "So to cut a long story short, I'm affraid you'll have to pack your things and be out of the house until 5 PM. You will receive your allowance for the next 6 weeks, and I wish you the best of luck in finding yourself another family in that time.

      "And, oh, mom and I decided to give ourselves a generous bonus for taking this cost-saving measure, and take a trip to a casin... err... morale-boosting seminar in Las Vegas."
      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  87. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by Threni · · Score: 1

    > Yes, I should have taken the time off in lieu, but that would have been cheating the customer.
    > There's such a thing as professional ethics.

    Yes, but there's also a more important thing called `look after yourself first, and the customers of your ex-employer some way after that`. I don't give a dick about my companies customers, any more than my company cares about me. It's a financial arrangement that I would sever in an instant if I didn't have to work. There's nothing particularly ethical about business in that sense.

  88. the worst company by bartuelo · · Score: 1

    It seems to me painful, now the company they do not want to face the employees. As always the employees, which we do that the companies pull forward, most harmed.

  89. Here's the actual e-mail exchange: by archeopterix · · Score: 4, Funny

    > On xx/xx/xxxx xx:xx The Employee <slave@thecompany> wrote:
    >> On xx/xx/xxxx xx:xx The Management <lickmyboots@thecompany> wrote:
    >> Knock, knock!
    >>
    > Who's there?

    Not you anymore! Hahahahahaaaaa!

    1. Re:Here's the actual e-mail exchange: by King_B · · Score: 1

      This is hysterical, did you write it?

    2. Re:Here's the actual e-mail exchange: by archeopterix · · Score: 1
      This is hysterical, did you write it?

      Nope, I ripped it off the famous Dilbert strip. Seemed to fit.

  90. E-liminated. by HeX314 · · Score: 1

    They really should have put e-liminated in the original letter.

  91. heh by Zulu · · Score: 0

    And I thought those "ch34p r0l3x repl1cas!" spam emails were annoying...

  92. That's per time served by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read it again.

    "Laid-off workers got one to three weeks pay for each year of service..."

    What does that mean? To get 36 weeks of severance pay, you'd have had to work at Radio Shack for twelve years. That's no jet-setting, worker-exploiting fat cat, that's a loyal employee who devoted ten percent of his maximum lifespan to the corporation. 20 extra weeks for having actually worked up the corporate ladder isn't inappropriate. That's how the system is supposed to be.

    Golden handshakes for executives who just dropped into the company, reorganized for a year, and then moved on are a totally different phenomenon.

    The CAPTCHA for this post is "firers". How odd.

    1. Re:That's per time served by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but why do loyal hourly employees only get up to 16 weeks? Are people who've worked in management for 12 years actually more than twice as important as hourly people who worked there for 25? (Note that's on top of the difference in salary they'll be paid for those weeks.)

      And WTF is with 'one to three weeks' per year? That seems somewhat vague.

      I'm also vaguely confused as to how hourly employees get 'weeks' of pay. Shouldn't they get hours of pay? I mean, what if they said 'Okay, you get six weeks of pay, and we've scheduled you to work...two hours each week'. They're obviously not doing that, but it doesn't make a lot of sense.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:That's per time served by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm also vaguely confused as to how hourly employees get 'weeks' of pay. Shouldn't they get hours of pay? I mean, what if they said 'Okay, you get six weeks of pay, and we've scheduled you to work...two hours each week'. They're obviously not doing that, but it doesn't make a lot of sense."

      Let's 'theorize':

      They probably mean salaries versus 'hourly' as in paid only for the hours worked. For salaried people, 'two weeks' should be unambiguous. For 'hourly' workers, two weeks most likely adds up to what would be the normal pay for two weeks for the person. For example, some stores may have some people who only worked on fri/sat/sun, because those days are busier. My guess would be that those people would get 6 days of pay, and the guys that worked 'full time' would get 10.

      Or maybe they assigned each worker to the '1', '2', or '3' group: the '3 weeks' is for the 'full timers' and the '1 week' for the week-enders, and '2 weeks' for the cases in between.

      I'm just guessing.

  93. A job shouldn't be as important as parents&/sp by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 1

    I would like to ask what is wrong with us as an society when a job is felt as important as parents and spouse?

    The truth is that a job is just a job, it's a way to pay bills and at best it's a way to fulfil ones dreams and desires. If one looses a job, one can search another job and another way to make relevance to his/her life if the job one loosed even offered that. It should be also noted that a job doesn't raise or lower ones worth as an human being: being a jobless, or a multimillionaire CEO or garbage man doesn't change ones worth even a little bit.

    What I argue is that most people are just afraid of change, they are fearful of the unknown and don't want to answer such questions like 'Who am I', 'Why am I important', 'What do I want from my life' and 'Why I want something'. What people don't realize that life itself is in constant change and the future and the present day have full of unknowns. When one let's go and starts to empraise the change and sees the unknown as an possibility, then ones life will be much more joy able than it otherwise would be.

    On a note, I'm an entrepreneur with a little software start-up going on. I have never been fired, but I have had my share of bad news in many forms: working in projects that went dead, leading successful projects that backfired to me an an person, working hard in another start-up that went belly up, changing locations many times and having to say goodbye to friends and look for new ones. There has been lot of change in my life, but at the end of the day it has been always for the best of myself. So next time something bad happens, ie. you loose your job, don't be too saddened because there is a change of new beginning.

  94. something in contrary by mapkinase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have read all the 5-rated comments and seems to me that the consensus is American job culture sucks, Radio Shack sucks.

    Due to my trollish habits, I am always inclined to say something in contrary.

    At the last company I worked for, there were 3 waves of firing people. In all of them a top level manager talked to them, thanked them and explained to them why they are fired. That it has nothing to do with them, that it is related to the products performance which is very little to do with them. Of course, people were not happy anyway, and they rightfully should not be: well, they were fired, but there was an effort from the company to alleviate the pain.

    The company I am talking about is not the best, and it has a bad reputation in the IT industry for their cold and mindless approach to people, so I assume the situation with graceful firing is better in other IT companies.

    I have to admit though that people who were fired were seasoned professional programmers, many with PhD in physical, chemical and biological sciences.

    Another important comment is that the waves were about 50-100 people. When the amount of people to be laid off is larger it becomes a logistic problem to fire them at once, in one take to minimize the effect on job. It might explain the "e-mail" twist of it, but in no way it explains the "no-thanks" angle. So yes, Radio Shack sucks.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  95. This is hardly a first... by adamsutton · · Score: 1

    This is hardly the first example of this sort of thing happening, you only have to do a quick search on Google to find hundreds of other examples of people being sacked by email or even SMS.

    One that particularly stands out in my mind was when approx 2500 people working for an insurance firm in the UK were sacked (mostly by SMS message).

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2949578.stm

  96. But.. by Crimson+Fire · · Score: 1

    If they don't open it does it mean they aren't fired?

  97. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by Triv · · Score: 1

    Not entirely true. Of all the industries I've worked in (Retail, Retail Corporate, Reference Libraries, tech services, etc.; a nice sampling of the market), you know what business was filled with the most cheerful, friendly, kind, compassionate, intelligent and good-hearted people?

    An advertising agency. Is that fucked up or WHAT?

  98. Once upon a time... by Patrick+Gliddon · · Score: 1

    ...we were persons and, being persons, we had a "Personnel" department. Then times changed, and now we have a "Human Resources" department. Non-humans and persons need not apply.

  99. Oh the humiliation by popsicle67 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I once worked for a company that was as chickenshit as this. One of the partners was diagnosed with cancer so he sold his holdings and went to Ireland to live whatever he had left. An ex-wife of his son had a job in the company and they wanted to get rid of her quietly so they sent a process server to the bungelow she was staying in on Maui with her final check and severance. She hired a lawyer in hawaii and filed suit there after renting a house that her lawyer found her for residency reasons. She sought 3 million in damages and the company had to deal with the whole thing,including depositions by all of the parties involved in the buyout, in hawaii which damn near broke the bastards. She never figured to win, she just wanted to see them jump through hoops. They eventually settled out of court with the usual NDA but I know it had to be a good chunk because she sent all the people she knew in the company a 250 dollar gift certificate for Walmart that christmas saying she knew the company wouldn't be able to afford the usual christmas turkeys that year.

    1. Re:Oh the humiliation by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      She never figured to win, she just wanted to see them jump through hoops. They eventually settled out of court with the usual NDA but I know it had to be a good chunk because she sent all the people she knew in the company a 250 dollar gift certificate for Walmart that christmas saying she knew the company wouldn't be able to afford the usual christmas turkeys that year.

      While I'm almost tempted to say "good for her", I cannot bring myself to condone terrorism, legal or otherwise.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Oh the humiliation by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      > She hired a lawyer in hawaii and filed suit there after renting a house that her lawyer found her for residency reasons.

      This is a good yarn, but sounds improbable. The corporation would have been near impossible to sue there because it's headquarters weren't in Hawaii. Furthermore, the corporation could have had the case transferred to another venue because Hawaii is an inconvenient forum. Renting a house there is not enough to establish domicile since the rental was done in preparation for the lawsuit.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re:Oh the humiliation by Kadmos · · Score: 1

      Wait, just to clarify: Is this use of the word "terrorism" the USA's "everyone is out to get us (the good guys) and we will construe any act we possibly can as terrorism", or is this your own personal whack job?

  100. This is heartless by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, I usually am the one who says we don't need new laws, but in this case, I think it's justified. Noone should be fired or laid off in any other way other then in person. Not on the phone, not by a voice mail, not via text message and certainly not via e-mail. Any other way should be considered invalid. There should also be other rules also....rules that say you have to be human about the whole thing. None of this shutting down card keys and removing desks or anything else.

    --

    Gorkman

  101. Re:Too Bad... :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody makes you work for a greedy corporate organization though. It's a choice.

    True. You can work for a greedy corporate organization, or you can starve.

    "I chose not to choose life. I chose something else..."

  102. forward it by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    Just forward the message to someone you can't stand...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  103. I'm not sure I agree by jesterzog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't feel at all good about the precedent of firing people using email, but I'm reluctant to make an assumption based on the tone of a slashdot story. The article states:

    Company officials had told employees in a series of meetings that layoff notices would be delivered electronically, spokeswoman Kay Jackson said. She said employees were invited to ask questions before Tuesday's notification on a company intranet site.

    If this is true, it at least means that the company had given employees some warning that bad news was coming. In another, more complete article, it's stated that employees had a good chance to ask questions before the emails, and meet with management staff after the emails.

    To be honest, it does sound a bit dehumanising with the way it's being reported, but put in a different context, it could also be that sending the actual notifications via email (after sufficient warning) was simply the best way to do it, for everyone, in that particular business.

  104. Here's some irony for ya by multipartmixed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    - Radio Shack Canada is no longer affiliated with Radio Shack USA
      - Radio Shack Canada no longer exists
      - Radio Shack Canada is now "Circuit City: The Source"
      - They now carry more electronics components than they have in 5-10 years

    At least there is some place local where I can buy SOME components again. I'm happy. Digikey is great, but you just can't run out and grab something you suddenly need when your main supplier is mail order.

    I just wish they still carried those little Archer PCBs etched for a single ~14-pin DIP. I used my second-last one last weekend.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:Here's some irony for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - They now carry more electronics components than they have in 5-10 years

      And they still don't have any of them in stock.
      Or even know what they are in the first place...

    2. Re:Here's some irony for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Radio Shack Canada is no longer affiliated with Radio Shack USA ---- bullshit try radioshackisback.com
          - Radio Shack Canada no longer exists ---- horseshit see first line
          - Radio Shack Canada is now "Circuit City: The Source" --- actually RSusa sued to be able to buyback RSca so as to not dilute the Name
          - They now carry more electronics components than they have in 5-10 years ---- i will give you that one for CC:TS

  105. You mean $45 RF convertors aren't big sellers? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Radio Shack is ok for the odd cable, cell phone battery and maybe a pair of cheap headphones. Other than that? Not much.

  106. A Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe the company had an "A Team".

    I used to be a technician at a plant where the day shift had what we referred to as the "A Team", a group of mostly polictical appointees deigned to be the best design and problem solvers we had, so deigned by their buddies the management. Additionally there was only one good tech on the graveyard shift and once when he was on vacation one of the machines went down and stayed down till dayshift arrived and the A Team decided to take charge of the machine's repair. When my 2nd shift came on we were instructed the machine was down for repairs and not to touch it as it was under the control of the A Team. After discussing the issue with the graveyard crew when they came on that night we had a pretty good guess as to what was wrong with it, which brought us puzzled looks from the graveyard crew. We left a note for the A Team with our suggestion and went home for the night, when we arrived the next day we were told our guess was wrong, they had not checked it mind you but they "knew" we were wrong. Three days later the machine was still down but they wanted us to do some routine maintenance on the machine while it was down. Thus with permission to work on the machine we proceeded to do the routine maintenance and while we were at it slipped a new latch relay into the control circuit ran by the cam timer. The next morning the "A Team" "fixed" the machine. We were greeted with some evil looks when we came in that night.

    Amusingly when the one decent third shift tech returned from vacation his fellow shift techs were telling him about it and he asked them "did you replace the latch relay on that cam timer circuit?" He just shook his head when they said it was turned over to the "A Team" and was down several days. Noticing us laughing into our hands and looking at us with quizzical eyes we simply said: "after a few days they had us perform general maintenance on the machine and then the next day they fixed it." He was still laughing when we clocked out.

  107. Check out Radio Shack's wrongdoing by applix7 · · Score: 1

    E-firings are harsh. And yet, they do recycle my old batteries.... http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/malfy.html

  108. I can sympathise by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    I recently lost my job, though not as mercilessly as the RadioShack method. Well, actually, I tell a lie: I was forced out my job - http://www.btinternet.com/~dr_paul_lee/autonomy.ht m

  109. layoff notice via disable user account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many years ago I was working as a system admin for one of the largest computer companies in the world. We were going thru some major downsizing. Our standard procedure was at the end of the day, we were shown a list of employees who were being let go, our computer operators would disable their accounts that evening. The employee would show up next morning and the person's manager/supervisor would then inform them of the bad news and would walk them to their desk and let them clean it out and escort them out the door.

    Of course, the person's manager/supervisor would be too cowardly to show up on time on the day the employee was being let go. The employee would show up at say, 8:00 a.m on the boss would show up at 9:15-9:30 (deliberately late). When the employee couldn't log into their account, they would phone the system admin (me) and ask me to reset their password. I told them I couldn't do that (because their name had been on the termination list the previous day) and they were annoyed at me for refusing to do so. I asked them to talk to their manager (who wasn't there). After a while people had heard about this. The next time they couldn't log in, they would phone me and when I told them I couldn't enable their account, they would say "am I getting let go", and I would hear the "I just bought a house", "my wife is pregnant", etc. They shouldn't have to hear that they were being let go from me. It just shows you how cowardly the local manager of that person was.

    Once we had people with the same first initial and last name (such as Carol Brown with login name of cbrown and Christine Brown with login name of crbrown). Lets say that Christine (crbrown) was being let go. The computer operators disabled cbrown (Carol's account) instead. Carol Brown thought that she was being let go when she couldn't log in.
    Someone later told her "sorry for the incovenience".

    My boss works two hours from my site. I had been with the company for 30 years. When it was time to let me know that I was history, my boss wanted to drive to where I work and tell me in person. My boss's boss didn't want to pay mileage so I got the info via phone.
    What a company.

    Companies are soulless and heartless. I am surprised more people don't go postal these days. Also, when people are let go, the workload doesn't go with them, its dumped on the poor suckers who remain behind.

  110. A few Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just a few things

    1 THE NAME OF THE COMPANY IS RadioShack and has been for some time editors please fix this in the title

    2 when you nee the Grim Reaper sharpening his scythe and he has a list in his hands on RSH letterhead do you think that some folks might not have jobs soon?

    3 earlier this year they closed some 400 stores (be cause they sucked) but are opening a few hundred others

    4 the "vegas trip" is an annual thing and in fact was mostly paid for by the vendors that they will be buying entire production shifts from

    5 yes this does E-Suck but ... eggs and omletes

  111. Say what you feel to their PR group by EWIPlayer · · Score: 1, Troll

    Email: media.relations@RadioShack.com

    I emailed them and told them that I won't be shopping at their stores until they make this right. An apology attached to a 4 figure check is what I suggested. Let's face it, a corporate apology that doesn't have money attached to it (since corps only care about money) is an empty apology.

    --
    This sig used to be really funny...
  112. Hey, I agree with you buddy... by maillemaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading the posting calling you a sociopath, I figured I'd chime in to say I agree with you.

    Working for corporations means you /are/ largely an anonymous cog in an impersonal machine. All of the lip-service paid to the "we're all one big family" idea is just that - lip service - and all but the dolts know it.

    I've been laid off once before, and if I had to choose between an email and having it done in person I'd take the email.

    Feeling like you got special, personal treatment being laid off in person is like feeling you got special, personal treatment from the greeter at WalMart. It's meaningless fluff.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  113. Wow... by rhiafaery · · Score: 1

    How utterly crass and unprofessional. My ex worked as a manager at a Radio Shack in Connectict for nearly 10 years before finally quitting in disgust after the company literally tried to suck the soul and lifeforce out of him. Their policies have been atrocious for years, low pay, as many hours as they think they can get you in for and still MAYBE have time for sleep, racist tendencies and now this ultimate in laziness and unprofessionalism. I feel for these people, and hope they get some kind of justice or at least recognition from this incident.

    --
    "I am treated as evil by those who feel persecuted because they are not allowed to force me to believe as they do."
  114. Radio Shack has become useless. by Xocet_00 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if they do have what I need, it's usually hideously overpriced. I've given up on Radio Shack (or The Source or whatever it's called now) for my parts. As nice as it is to be able to get things from a brick-and-mortar (since I'm very impatient), I've found that using http://www.digikey.com/ is just better all-around.

  115. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  116. Just wait by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >Is it any wonder then that stuff gets outsourced to destinations like India?
    >And that more and more workers are coming from America to work in India?

    Don't sweat it - very soon the same mentality will be there, too.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  117. "Oh the dehumanization! Wah wah wah!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were fired by email I would accept it. I'd expect myself to take it because I'm a GROWN MAN.

    I didn't make the rules. When something happens that I don't like, 99 times out of 100 it had to happen that way. I don't start whimpering "they could have just (whatever)", because... well! what would I look like? Also it embarrasses the people whose hands are tied.

  118. Do not believe it, email is too easily forged by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    With nothing more than the "telnet" program I can send you what ever email I want from the "jb2@whitehouse.gov", or any other organization I so choose. Go ahead, fire your boss! Maybe it was his idea, or maybe his bosses bosses boss? Hell, fire everyone! Close down the plant, except for the janitor of course, he's too cool, and somebody needs to turn out the lights!


    Just kidding here about the boss bit, but the telnet part is *very true*. Don't even believe email if it is signed with a crypto certificate that you know you can trust. It could still be a hacker who got access to your bosses email account and company address book. How many bosses you know that would detect that their account was breached? Not many, unless you work for a security firm.


    Just don't believe the email until you talk to your supervisors boss to see that it was authorized. Your boss may just be hoping you don't show up so they can fire you with cause.

    1. Re:Do not believe it, email is too easily forged by sweetnjguy29 · · Score: 1

      This is the reason why letting someone go via e-mail is such a horrid idea. How do you know that someone in the IT department isn't playing an evil joke on you?

      I agree with hAckz0r's post that if you do get one of these emails, you should immediately call your boss (or HR department) to confirm that it is true.

      Then, go to your office place immediately to collect your things and wipe your computer of all of your personal stuff.

      The last time I was laid off we were cryptically told to "take a few days of vacation". We were told the next day, via e-mail, that 95% of the group had been laid off, including myself. The e-mail was nice and understanding. Meh.

  119. Join Union... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and demand for grace period when you are fired. Many countries have law that says that you have pay between 14 days - 6 months salary depending on how long you working for the company if one is being fired.

  120. I worked there in the late 90s by slapout · · Score: 1

    And this doesn't surprise me one bit.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  121. They must be by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    If they were in the UK I am sure they would be a member of "Investors in People", the organisation that gets you to emphasise that your people are your best asset.

  122. layoff's can be a bitch by FictionPimp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I once worked for a small ISP that was bought by a big ISP. The big ISP layed us all off only to bring us back a few weeks later because they didn't know how the stuff worked. Then they moved us to their home office. I worked there for a few years. I got a girlfriend and we were going to get an appartment. I noticed the signs that they would be doing a layoff soon. So I approached my boss and told him I was going to sign a lease on a new appartment (with increased costs) tomarrow and I wanted to make sure my job was secure. He said it was secure and the layoff rumors were just rumers. Then he reminded me of our saturday morning meeting to cover policy changes. So I went home, signed my new lease, work up saturday morning and went to work for the meeting. When I got to the meeting we were told we were all being layed off and asked to sign a Non disclusure agreement to get our last paycheck. I walked up to my boss, put my fist though the wall directly next to his head and left. My paycheck came on time.

    1. Re:layoff's can be a bitch by darjen · · Score: 1

      Of course they are not going to tell you before they officially announce it. What if they did, and you go around spilling the beans to everyone? That would make life pretty difficult for them. If there really was doubt about your job, you should have just waited on the apartment until you felt more comfortable. I don't blame you for being upset though, I've been through similar situations.

    2. Re:layoff's can be a bitch by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      All the boss would have had to have said was, "I know that there are rumors, but no decision has been made yet. A decision is expected next week, though, so if you can hold off on signing for a week, it might be financially safer."

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  123. 1980's nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was one of those nerdy geeks as well. Worked at RS while attending high school & college back in the early 1980's. I created a spreadsheet in VisiCalc to help the manager with inventory allocation -- it got distributed all over the company. The job was a joke, as was the company. Management was really dumb, even for retail! It's hard to believe they are still in business.

    You are correct about the parts. Margins on those were tremendous, and local competition was non-existant. They had the PC market cornered at one point, and they blew it. To an extent, customers are the problem. They are quite content to shop where competent people give reasonable advice, and then make the actual purchase at a big-box store where nobody knows anything but the price is right.

    RS would love to be a mainstream electronics retailer, but their prices were not competitive. Either they did a poor job of negotiating and their cost was too high, or they did a poor job of analyzing competitor's prices. Or maybe they drowned themselves with internal overhead costs. They also had their inventory spread out too thin over too many stores. Although they tried to be the 7-11 of electronics, the typical customer seldom found what he wanted at the first RS he visited. Some convenience!

    I'm told they did well in remote sections of the country where they didn't face big-box competition. Sure didn't pan out that way where I lived.

    Business practices, wages, working conditions all pretty much sucked. If I were one of the employees getting those e-mails, I would look forward to getting a raise at my next job. It would be hard to find anything that pays less.

  124. Re:Too Bad... :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of us Slashdotters had girlfriends and go to college. I would have to work at RadioShack for a year or two to fix up my Momma's basement because it is a dirt hole you asshole!!! -- All Trolls Are Assholes when they are trolling

  125. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by RiddleofSteel · · Score: 1

    You think American companies are cold and heartless, try working for the British. Since they've taken over the CEO has personally told at least 5 people I know not to worry about their job and then fired them that week. It's almost like they take a personal satisfaction in raising up their hopes and then smashing them on the rocks. At least they do it in person though.

  126. Happened to me though a smaller scale by GodaiYuhsaku · · Score: 1

    Last summer, I worked through as a tech for an area school district doing re-installs/reformats of the schools computer systems. After about a month and a half of working with a growing team. The liason in charge of the project sent out an email tuesday afternoon to pretty much all the techs on the project saying. "Hi thanks, don't come back tommorow." What was funny is that her email created an impromptu email bitching list since she left all the emails visable (in the to and cc: fields) So everyone knew everyone else was fired as well. Was 30-40 people fired I believe.

  127. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by xTown · · Score: 1

    It happens only in America. American corporates are a bunch of ingrates. The work culture sucks. There is no humanity, no love and no warmth. All the 'Hi, how you doin', 'Hi, how are you today?', 'So nice to see you again' and other phrases of warmth and caring are all feigned.

    What does that have to do with America? I used to work for a French company where the upper management didn't care about how we were and didn't even bother to try feigning it. Indeed, by the time I got laid off, the most important thing to management had become keeping us in R&D from talking to the sales department, so that our "negativity" wouldn't affect them. Seriously--I know someone who was reprimanded just for saying, within earshot of the sales manager, that getting laid off really sucks.

    I really doubt that nationality matters that much; a prick is a prick the world around.

  128. Re:HP _did not_ fire you by email on Monday. by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    When I've been in this situation, everyone got invited to a meeting. But there were two meetings. People invited to one got to stay, people invited to the other got laid off. There were, of course, managers at each door to ensure that everyone was in the right meeting. It was actually a decent way to handle a bad situation.

    Could be worse. One place I got laid off the HR person came in and asked to "see you for a few minutes"... By the time you got the bad news and went to clean out your desk IT had cut your accounts and deactivated your entry badge. That's not so bad, but... In one case, IT threw the switch before HR talked to the guy. "Why won't the doors open? Why can't I log in?" IT had to tap-dance around his calls for an hour or two before HR caught up.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  129. Dear John by fugl · · Score: 1

    That's nothing! I was Dear Johned by email back in 1995.

    Oddly, I was ok with that.

  130. 30 years ago Radio Shack fired me... by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

    Thirty years ago Radio Shack fired me while I lay in a hospital bed (motorcycle accident). Seems their HR skills haven't improved much over the years.

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
  131. email? I didn't get no email. by billhedrick · · Score: 1

    This might seem a little Office Spacey, but if that happened to me, I'd go into work and make them fire me in front of customers.

  132. Is it legal? by AxminsterLeuven · · Score: 1

    Here in Belgium an employer, firing an employee, is required by law to notify that employee either by an officially registered letter (at the postal office, costing the employer some 5 extra) or by enlisting an official bailiff. What's US law on this? Just curious, really...

  133. SPAM Filter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope the SPAM filter didn't catch that one.

  134. New Radio Shack Slogan by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    First, their original slogan:
        "You got questions? We've got answers."

    Then, due to lack of actual answer content:
        "You got questions? Uh, we've got Batteries."

    Now, SpeemCo marketing division presents the new 2007 Radio Shack slogan:
        "You've got mail! You're Fired!"

    Now, if we can just find a clip of the AOL "you got mail" guy and Donald trump, we could have the beginnings for a techno song... hmmmm I gotta go.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  135. Game Over Man!! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Game OVER!!!!

    In all seriousness, that REALLY sucks ass but it's not surprising considering that businesses have reached the point where they can fuck your dog and you can't say anything about it. So... anyone still think we don't need protection for employees from their employers?

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  136. Why didn't they... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    Wait until Friday? I mean haven't statistics shown that there's less chance of an "incident"?

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  137. Re:HP _did not_ fire you by email on Monday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be even worse. One person I know was on their honeymoon when the decision to fire them came down. H.R. wanted to cut their credit card while they were away (before even notifying them). Their manager went to bat and got them to hold off until the person returned to work. Talk about taking the 'H' out of H.R.

  138. Oops by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry all intercompany mail has been going into my spam folder. I'm just cleaning my gun here, did you want something?

  139. Stole my idea... by moyix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always wanted to break up with a girl via electronic greeting card:

    "moyix has sent you an e-card! Click here to read it!"
    *click*
    "Yeah, I'm breaking up with you. Enjoy this cute picture of a kitten, though."

    1. Re:Stole my idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you were joking (I hope) but...I once got broken up with via MySpace. Without the cute kitten picture, which would have alleviated the pain somewhat.

      Damn the Internet.

    2. Re:Stole my idea... by Krojack · · Score: 1

      But thanks to the Internet you can quickly get yourself a new gf or bride

      Enjoy!

  140. Quit Your Job Day - Sept 18th by neo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A job is basically an exchange of skill and effort for currency. In some cases the measurement of skill and effort is based on hours worked, and those employed in this way are called hourly workers or contractors. In other cases skill and effort is not measured, these permanent employees are given a guaranteed salary. Contrary to what the term permanent implies, in both cases the majority of jobs are actually at will, which means that either the employee or the employer may terminate the relationship at any time, for almost any reason.

    It should be noted that it is the employer that invokes at will termination in the vast majority of cases.

    If you don't know the person who signs your paycheck, they don't know you. You're just a number on a spreadsheet. Quit now before they realize you're number is too big.

  141. Before you k now it by fyrie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Before you know it, people are going to start e-dumping each other.

    1. Re:Before you k now it by darjen · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, that happened to me 6 months ago.

    2. Re:Before you k now it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, a guy where I work used an email to ask his wife for a divorce!

  142. Not going to buy from them by arock99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because of this I wont be buying anything from them anytime soon (they are called "The Source" here in Canada). Oh wait...because of their prices I don't buy from them anyways...being so inpersonal with their employees makes you wonder just what kind of level of service they can actually provide to a customer once he's paid for something How hard is it to actually tell someone in person that he/she is being let go? Yes it's not a given but is a much better method than emailing someone.

    1. Re:Not going to buy from them by loftwyr · · Score: 1

      Actually, Radio Shack is not "The Source", the company that ran the Radio Shack stores in Canada lost rights to the Radio Shack name for various reasons. They're full name is "The Source by Circuit City". Radio Shack is returning slowly but surely to Canada.

      Proof? Go here Make sure you boycott the right stores.

  143. One wonders.... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

    ....What kind of havok spam of this nature could cause.

    I can't believe "serious" issues like this get discussed over standard e-mail. E-mail isn't secure, people, and e-mail can be forged.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  144. And furthermore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no corperation gives a rats ass about their employees.
    this has been true for decades.
    ...most corporate management types who do the hiring and firing are all pretty much total chickenshits at heart.

    1. Re:And furthermore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is that pubically traded corperations are run in stupid ways. All that matters is stock price and profits to stock holders.. Nobody in management cares about quality or doing things right let alone any employee. Only privately owned companies care about any of that. I know I lived the corperate life for 7 years and saw that the corperation does not care about doing it right, or quality of work, or even the quality of the product ot the customers. Loyalty to employees = 0... one guy left for cancer treatement and they "eliminated his position" in a way to get rid of him and hire someone else with a different title (same job, different title = we can fire you at will and skirt labor laws.)

      They do not care about you, and any manager that says they care is lying. When it comes down to it they will not go to bat for you if it risks their job because they know that he company does not care.

      It's normal operating proceedures. People are easily replaced, who cares about experience and productivity, how can we make next quarter look good to the stock holders...

      which is why I refuse to work for any publically traded corperation anymore.

  145. RE: Employment by r3zurector · · Score: 0

    RE: Notification of Employment
    Dr Mr./Ms./Mrs. Radioshack employee we regret to inform you that you are being laid off because of recent cutbacks but the good news:

    MAKE A WISH
    *
    *
    *
    *
    *
    Now Send this to the first five people on your @Radioshack.com address book and you will find eternal joy! You, and all future recipients of this email will be fired. You must follow the instructions of this email or forfeit your severance package. Kisses!"

    Thanks,
    Management

  146. An email? How very mid 90s. by aristolochene · · Score: 1

    You yanks, always a bit behind on the technology curve.

    In the UK, we fire people by text message these days.

    URL:http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/wl_uk_a fp/britaintelecomjobs>

    --
    echo $SIGNATURE
  147. Receipt by ducttapekz · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Man has requested a read receipt, would you like to send that now?"

  148. Well, considering how un-knowing *most* of RS is.. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if someone actually tried suing RS for this type of impersonal firing, on the grounds of emotional damages alone.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  149. not that new by mdmarkus · · Score: 1

    This isn't that new. In the early '90s, i (along with 90% of the rest of our office) got laid off by telegram over New Years. Seems they had made their decision late and needed it done before the end of the year for tax reasons. With Western Union gone, i guess Radio Shack felt the need to improvise.

  150. Layoff-detection software by pebrmatt · · Score: 1

    A company I used to work for had a tradition of handling layoffs (about 5 of them by the time they sold the business) on Fridays. After the first couple of layoffs, we discovered that the MIS guy (Roger) was coming in late on the preceding Thursday and backing up the HDs of the soon-to-be-unemployed. One of my coworkers wrote something that would display the time of the last bootup (this was in the days before Windows, so simply examining the security event log wasn't an option). He'd installed his program on a Thursday and was amused/horrified on Friday when he discovered that his machine had been turned on late the night before. I called me over to confirm that his program was working properly. It was. He confronted Roger about it. Roger looked surprised, but had to deny any knowledge of it. My friend was laid off that afternoon, but was cheered up by the success of his detective work and the fact that at least he had a few hours warning.

  151. And people wonder why RS was the worst place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...That I say I have EVER worked at.
    Seriously, as you can plainly see, there is no loyalty to the employees, and I've been saying that since I worked there 5 years ago.
    Though most of the workers were from the corporate headquarters locations, and are on a different 'platform' than the employees in the retail stores (like I was), it's the same mentality of "The Company" versus "People in the company", meaning that every employee was faceless and lost in a sea of quotas and dollar signs.
    Sure, every company wants to make money, and sure, maybe a lot of companies are the epitome of "The Corporate Machine", but I've worked for other companies before that were NOTHING like RadioShack...Hell, they were even MORE profitable than RS!!!

    All-in-all, the place sucks, and I've been saying it for years, and this just finally proves what I've been saying, but have had a hard time putting into words.

  152. Fired vs. Made Redundant by ckhorne · · Score: 1

    The terminology "made redundant" doesn't exists in the US (and sounds a bit silly to us)- it's only being "fired" or "laid off". It doesn't have the same connotation that it does in the UK. I lived in the UK for a couple years, and took a while for me to get used to this...

  153. that's nothing by f1055man · · Score: 2, Funny

    At my college job, we had to turn in some forms to get a schedule for the fall semester. I started at the beginning of summer semester. I turned in my forms and never got a schedule. I kept asking about it. I knew there might be some problems because I wasn't work-study and thus not free for the university. About a week before the fall semester started I ran into a coworker at a party. He says, "nice working with you," then walks away. As we were both trashed I couldn't tell if that was past tense or not. Two days later I received an email from a bot informing me that I had been removed from the employee listserve. The manager never even contacted me. A couple weeks later I went in for my last pay check and she acted as though it was perfectly normal to let a script fire someone. So Radio Shack employees should be grateful that a human fired them, even if it was through email.

  154. Re:yep... the question is... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    Which is more soul destroying? Being told by email that you are fired; or admitting to yourself you don't have the nuts to tell someone in person that you are terminating their job?

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  155. That gives me an evil idea... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    I have an evil idea: what if someone very craftily forged similar e-mail firings to the heartless managers who thought up this idea?

    That might be fun, eh?

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  156. if I wrote the email by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    If I wrote the email, it would go something like this:

    Dear Sucker, You're fired.... Nanny nanny boo boo.

    And I'd send it using Mikro$oft Lookout, from an address called fired@insertthecompanysdomainnamehere.com, and guess what? I'd probably click one wrong button and send the email to ALL of the company's 40,000 employees. Guess who will be saying nanny nanny boo boo to who.

  157. Not enough Mod .'s by bjk002 · · Score: 1

    I wish I could mod you up to +10 Truthful

    --
    Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
  158. Schmucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has about as much class as having your mistress call your wife to tell her you want a divorce.

  159. Even Lamer, and even better.... by no_pets · · Score: 1

    Even Lamer... schedule the email firings to be mailed in an hour. Then leave early.

    Even Better... delete the email and keep coming to work. Claim you never received the message and that it must have gotten caught in the spam filter.

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
  160. Re:Even better by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Why do one or the other?

    Send out the fake to everyone. When the correction gets sent out, send that to everyone, including the actually fired people.

    Instant mass confusion.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  161. RUBBISH!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Cayenne, while you make an excellent point about employment always being temporary, the rest of your post is complete rubbish.

    I'm making an assumption here - either you have no children of your own or you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth (probably both to have such an elitist attitude). He should move to a place with a lower cost of living? Newsflash bucko, those places with lower costs of living generally have jobs that pay less. And having kids isn't the cut and dry ledger transaction that you might believe it is, you soulless mercenary.

    Then again, it follows along with your prior post, where you implicitly state your lack of loyalty and your cavalier attitude toward the poor unfortunates that take their jobs seriously (for better or worse). Perhaps it's best that you do not breed.

  162. Re: RadioShack e-fires workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It happens only in America. American corporates are a bunch of ingrates. The work culture sucks. There is no humanity, no love and no warmth.

    Yeah, but America has been the economic powerhouse of the world ever since WW II, so it's been exporting its corporate family values to the rest of the world. And the rest of the world has been so eager to do things the American way! Who are the idiots now?

  163. inhumane firings, the American way? by An+dochasac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone know of any other countries where such childish, sensless, brutal, inhumane and counterproductive employee termination techniques are used? My former (U.S. based) company used voice mail on recent firees (They couldn't fire me, I quit way ahead of time! ;-). The U.S. division of my current company uses immediate firing within the U.S. but employees outside of the U.S. are generally given time to get things in order, finish what they were working on, use company resources in the job hunt and talk to collegues to help ease the transition. This technique works! I've never heard of a case of an employee going postal or sabatoging the company here. So is it U.S. employees, U.S. managers or U.S. HR people who are being childish?

  164. Unacceptable by ZaBu911 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I find this unacceptable and un-American. I am not going to do business with Radioshack anymore. Sure you may say that by not doing business with them I am in fact making conditions worse for employees, because less revenue means less demand for labor, but that is bunk. My dollars will go to a more ethical corporation.

    1. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My dollars will go to a more ethical corporation.

      Did you just use the terms "ethical" and "corportaion" together?

    2. Re:Unacceptable by Krojack · · Score: 1

      You mean you shopped there before this? wow.. seems that place was always dead when I went there years ago.. I haven't shopped at a Radio Shaft in so long..

  165. Firing by SMS better? by LevKuleshov · · Score: 1
    What if someone didn't check their email?

    You could always try firing the employee by a text message instead as this company recently did.

    --
    Conquest's 3rd Law: Every organisation behaves as if it is run by secret agents of its opponents.
  166. oops by panic911 · · Score: 1

    They should have fired the person whos in charge of firing people last...

  167. "Severance Package" by kaladorn · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I have a friend who was working in Europe when they decided that they were closing up a section of the big IT company he was working for. He was on contract and happened to avoid the cut, but he witnessed another employee walk into a common area and detach a large LCD screen from the wall (others were taking CRT monitors, laptops, etc).

    That's sort of 'collecting severance' I suppose. The funny bit is that the manager, also axed, walked in and caught the guy detaching the big LCD TV from the wall. (Maybe it was plasma... doesn't matter). Anyway, instead of kicking his @$$ and sticking security on him for a quick lesson in the use of the PR-24, he *HELPED* the employee dismount the screen and transport it out to his vehicle.

    It seems the (former) manager had a lot of sympathy for his (former) employees that day and wasn't particularly interested (any longer) in the interests of the company, especially since it was shipping off a whole whack of work to the Pacific Rim.

    I'm not saying this sort of behaviour is right, but the way some business decisions get made and implemented, you find it hard at times to have much sympathy for the company.

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  168. Yeppers. by hullabalucination · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm right with you here.

    Radio Shack used to be a place where the hobbyist/student/geek-in-training could go to get stuff that no other local retailer offered. Back in school (70's) the campus store got a ton of business from the EE's and even from us students in the Art and Communications schools building small audio/video projects.

    Now my local store is trying to be Best Buy but with 1/20th the floor space, 1/20th the selection and prices that are 15% higher. Did not some MBA over at the Shack's Ft. Worth headquarters have the temerity to point this out to the PHB's?

    * * * * *

    Although golf was originally restricted to wealthy, overweight Protestants, today it's open to anybody who owns hideous clothing.
    --Dave Barry

  169. it's true by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    that's why managers/executive that can fake that sincere regret thing get the big bucks.

    --

    -pyrrho

  170. Re:A job shouldn't be as important as parents& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to ask what is wrong with us as an society when a job is felt as important as parents and spouse?


    Go back and re-read what the GP wrote. It is not that a job is as important as ones parents or spouse, but that losing your job could be as stressful as losing a loved one.


    The truth is that a job is just a job, it's a way to pay bills and at best it's a way to fulfil ones dreams and desires.


    Let me guess. 20-something, no spouse, no kids, no mortgage, and little responsibility to anyone other than yourself?

    From my personal view, the job I have now is far more important than "just a job" or a "way to pay bills". Losing my job would be a truly traumatic experience, and I'll tell you why. I have a wife and children that depend on me. I'm in a senior software engineering position, which pays quite well - finding an equivelant position at the same pay rate will take months, perhaps much longer (I have peers who searched for work they were not overqualified for 2+ years). Were I to lose my job, I could certainly collect unemployment, which would be about a quarter to a third of my current take-home pay. I have enough in savings to keep up on my obligations for about six to 10 months, which is coincidentally about the same amount of time it will take me to sell my house, which I may very well need to do if I can't find an equivalent position within about 6 months.

    By the time I find work, I may very well have depleted all of my cash reserves, part of my retirement savings, and liquidated the equity in our home.

    So yeah, it's "just a job". Please forgive me if I expect the guy delivering me a pink slip to have the sack to do it to my face. I actually was laid off of a previous job via email in 1998 and I have to tell you it sucks.

    Fortunately, I don't work for a company like Radio Shack.


    I have never been fired, but I have had my share of bad news in many forms: working in projects that went dead [...]


    Speaking as someone who has been laid off, and who has had dozens of projects cancelled, I can tell you that the two are not even close.
  171. The mandatory offsite meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few months ago my wife told me that everyone in her location had a mandatory offsite meeting first thing the next day. I immediately told her that they were closing her location.
    Clue 2: Some really early types tried to get some work in before the 9am meeting. They weren't allowed in the building.
    Clue 3: Offsite meeting was in 2 different rooms. An HR person had a list telling you what room you should go to.

  172. Spam Filter by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

    Just claim you never got the e-mail. Show up for work on Monday like nothing happened. Simple, really.

    --
    TODO: Insert witty sig
  173. Re:HP _did not_ fire you by email on Monday. by NaDrew · · Score: 1
    When I've been in this situation, everyone got invited to a meeting. But there were two meetings. People invited to one got to stay, people invited to the other got laid off. There were, of course, managers at each door to ensure that everyone was in the right meeting. It was actually a decent way to handle a bad situation.
    I was in the "laid off" room. Traffic to the two rooms was being directed by the office manager, a sweet old girl who shouldn't have been put in that position. Those of us in the "you're fucked" room got the idea pretty quickly when the senior asshole from Atlanta we called "the hatchet" rolled in with a big smile on his ugly mug.

    When the meeting ended I walked out, didn't bother with the chatty groups in the way, trashed my cube (with the excuse of recovering my personal property and also covering up that I was downloading all code I'd worked on), loaded the car and left. At least I got to meet my wife for lunch.

    Given that this was over two years ago now and I'm still bitter about it, I guess it affected me more than I'd think.
    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  174. The easy answer by gatesvp · · Score: 1

    Are you a Radio Shack employee? Don't like what they're doing? Then leave and tell them why you're leaving! Copy your manager and their manager and give them a month notice (or whatever time you figure you need to make up the salary).

    This site is filled with Dice ads telling you to "Get the respect you deserve", but the truth is that you won't receive that respect unless you're willing to play your cards. At the ultimate that means leaving the company. When it comes up at your next interview, explain that you did not appreciate the treatment of "other" employees and leave it at that. If they balk at that, then they're probably no better.

    The truth is, we "cogs" are mostly revenue streams. When we do a good job we make money for the company and take our cut. If we're too scared to leave, then we let the company decide our cut. It seems forgotten that we have the ultimate leverage here, when we leave, so does the revenue stream.

    There is a line where our revenue stream does not generate enough profits, it is our job to know that line and push towards it. It is the company's job to push the other way to maximize profits and keep us happy at the same time. It's a simple game (with infinite complexity).

    Complaining about poor practices does nothing but make loud noises. After reading this post, I would avoid working at Radio Shack like it was the plague. If you're on this boat, then do the same and tell the story to all of your friends and hope that they do the same. The Shack laid off hundreds of people, but unless hundreds more leave in disgust, then nobody there will care that we /.ers wagged our bony fingers.

  175. Bristol Myers Squibb/Clairol by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    My mom was a sales rep for BMS and also for their sister-company Clairol for many years during the 90's.

    One day she got a voice mail that she had to call into a conference call the following Thursday at 10am.

    Guess what? All x-thousand other sales reps that were also on the conference call were informed that their positions were all being eliminated in one single motion.

    Nice, eh?

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  176. RadioShack is the ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... most High Tech Store in the WORLD!

    Where else can by buy stuff to build a Plutonium Bomb.

    OOOOOOoooooooooppppppp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Now I've gone and dune it.

    Homeland (In)Security will target Philidelphia looking
    for a Nigger that let the Cat out of the Bag.

    Toodles!

  177. Charles Schwab does it by phone! by robcoh · · Score: 1

    Not unprecedented, but really rude... Hey, last April I was laid off from Charles Schwab's IT dept. via a phone call. My boss's boss's boss was too much of a coward to wait until I was in the office to do it face to face. Not everyone got this treatment. I was special - well at least the chain of command was special :=)) Don't worry about me, though. I received a hefty severance package and now have my own business. All the best, Rob

  178. I was publicly fired as girlfriend via LiveJournal by AriaStar · · Score: 1

    Dead serious.

    Much worse than e-mail.

    They got it easy. Though it still sucks. Who's gonna provide me with the crappy service now that I've always received when I've gone to Radio Shack?

  179. There are nuances, grasshopper by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    To start with your analogy with WalMart, yes, getting a persona treatment from the greeter still says something. It says that WalMart realizes that they need customers. Not you personally, of course, but that at least as a category you matter.

    Even in retail, yes, I'll have to say that I prefer to shop at places where I'm treated nicely. E.g., I get my games at a local EB-Games where the employees are nice, know me, and on the pragmatic side they know by now what I play and they can give me a meaningful recommendation.

    Oh, I'm sure that I'm not personally important in their lives, or anything. The fluff does make for a more pleasant shopping experience anyway, and I can afford to spend a measly couple of extra bucks (compared to Amazon) for a litte quality-of-life fluff.

    That goes for employers too. I'd rather work for someone who, at least generically, as a _category_, understands at least what my kind of employee is doing and why their bottomline depends on people like me. E.g., understands why the programs we wrote are actually reflected in millions of dollars they save. I'll be more inclined to do a little overtime, or maybe come on a weekend, when I know that someone at least notices the result.

    E.g., the guys I work for now have been known to have a party when we finished a program on time (apparently other departments rarely do), or stuff like that. I know that the big boss who decided that isn't going to remember my name personally, but it still is nice to see that he realizes that some good work went in there, and, basically, why is he paying people like me.

    By comparison, RS made it very clear what it thinks of its employees value. There are shades and shades of being a cog, and being an unappreciated one isn't particularly motivating.

    More importantly, companies and even corporations are made ultimately of _people_. Yes, maybe the corporation as a whole doesn't care about anyone, but people are supposed to. Ultimately it's the _people_ there who motivate or demotivate us, not the faceless company.

    Even if I didn't care about the company's feelings, taken as an abstract entity, I might be motivated by the _people_ I interact with. E.g., knowing that my boss is a nice guy and by and large one of us, is motivating in and by itself. Even if I don't think that the company as a whole will care, if I know that that one guy does care, and maybe I'm helping him a little with it, I'll be willing to work a little harder.

    By comparison, the boss who acts like he's an impersonal cog in an impersonal machine, won't help anyone's morale and won't make anyone want to help his. If he's just content to keep his own chair warm and not care about anyone, in return noone will care about him or about doing a good job for him.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  180. delusions, grasshopper... by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >To start with your analogy with WalMart, yes, getting a persona treatment from the greeter still says something. It says that WalMart realizes that they need customers.

    No, what it says is they need somone to watch the front door to make sure people don't try shoplifting by going out the entrance.

    Oh and it also says there are people in the world who get warm fuzzies from meaningless gestures.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  181. This should come as no surprise. by evansvillelinux · · Score: 1

    We do live in the information age/21st century and I am not at all surprised that this happened the way it did. And from what I heard on the news, Radio Shack Employees were told in advance that layoffs were coming in electronic format. What were they expecting?

    http://www.myspace.com/BigAlBassMan

    --
    IMHO, IANAL, TINLA, etc...
  182. Re:HP _did not_ fire you by email on Monday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my last job one of my friends was fired while away from the office. He found out when his email stopped working. A few weeks later, my email stopped working.

    I figured I had already been fired so I cleaned out my desk. Then, nobody fired me for a few hours. Eventually I got sick of waiting so I told my boss that if he was planning on firing me to just tell me now. It turns out he wasn't planning on firing me. My email had been cut off by a random(or not) glitch in the email. Man was that awkward.

    I took the opportunity to find a better job.

  183. Layoff via fire alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several years ago, my next door neighbor worked for a large credit card company, which shared a building with another credit-related firm, I think it was mortgages. Anyway, one morning, there's a fire alarm and the building is evacuated. The employees from my neighbors company were let back in the building after it was determined it was a false alarm. The employees of the other company were kept outside and told en masse that the office was closing and they were all losing their jobs. They were escorted individually back into their office to retrieve personal belongings, then walked back out. I am not aware if anyone was prosecuted for triggering the false fire alarm. I always thought this was the most chickens**t way of announcing a layoff that I have ever heard.

  184. Hatchet man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several years ago, I worked for a global office equipment company at one of their regional centers. Due to poor management and corporate resizing, many of our regional duties were taken away and we were placed under the control of another regional center. They sent a "hatchet man" to our office to give people the axe. He let 30 or 40 people go that first day. People would see him coming and literally run off to the restroom or someplace else to hide. The faint odor of death was in the air that day. They were given in most cases, at least 30 days notice and some incentive to stay up to a specific date. Almost immediately, there were postings for these same positions that were being eliminated in our office for openings in the office where these positions were going. Talk about rubbing salt in the wound! I almost couldn't believe it. This company, btw, is the poster child for bureaucracy and poor management.

  185. Taxes by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    Actually, you are not taxed any higher on a lump-sum payment. Look at your 1040. Do you see a line item for lump-sum payments? Of course not. They are taxed at the same rate as ordinary income.

    There is, however, a difference in withholding on a lump-sum payment. The payroll computer sees you're getting $20,000 in a paycheck and assumes that you make $400,000 per year and withholds at a higher tax bracket. That is why it withholds so much.

    You should have noticed a much-larger-than-usual refund on your taxes for that year as a result of the over-withholding.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:Taxes by Pdj79 · · Score: 1

      Alright, there was a higher withholding...but regardless, its money lost. I don't care what system the IRS uses, it should be one flat tax rate, one flat withholding rate to match it...period. And since I'm feeling saucy about this whole layoff situation, I'll For 2005 I cleared $37,843 before taxes. After pre-tax deductions, that total becomes $33,134. Total tax payments for the year with myself claiming 3 deductions for my wife and 2 kids came to $7,184. For my $19,000 severance, $4,824 were taken out for taxes. Going by this, 21% was withheld in 2005 while 25% was withheld for this lump sum. Its all a bunch of bunk to me.

    2. Re:Taxes by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure I don't understand a word of what you just said. Let me try, though.
      1. The IRS does not set the tax rates. Congress does. So you can complain to them if you feel you are paying too much in taxes.
      2. The money that was withheld was lost, but only temporarily. You certainly got that money back when you filed your income tax return for that year. If you wanted the money sooner, there are some tricks you can pull. But the fact still remains, your tax bill was not increased as a direct result of the payment being received in a lump sum.
      At any rate, I wish you the best of luck.
      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    3. Re:Taxes by Pdj79 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I thought I clarified that I made a mistake in referring to tax rate instead of withholding rate. In any event, I paid proportionately more, that pisses me off, and I think the system sucks. Yay, I get it back next year...that doesn't help me NOW. You know, the unemployed sod that can't find work in this city because I'm over-qualified for the entry-level positions and don't have enough experience for the next level. I could always go work for FedEX, UPS, or a warehouse, but that's an industry I am not interested in working in (years of schooling and fighting my way into my chosen field of work have made me a little apprehensive to go backwords, which I sure anyone can understand). In the end, I am upset that instead of just withholding a flat rate based on a flat tax rate (which I know doesn't really exist, but whatever) and subsequently requiring a payment for any underages, we have fluctuating withholding rates based on a single payment and then waiting until the following year to get it back. While its nice to get a big tax refund, it also aggravates me to no end to know that I overpaid for something. Most people hate overpaying for consumer goods (be it food, gas, or a Plasma television), so why wouldn't I hate overpaying for taxes? Does that help clarify my stance?

    4. Re:Taxes by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
      I can certainly understand your aggrivation at having more money withheld from your paycheck than you expected, and I agree that getting a big refund in January/February of next year is little consolation when you need the money now. In the future, you may be able to contact your company's payroll department before you receive your lump-sum payment and ask them to change the default withholding for you.

      At my company, for instance, I can have payroll withhold whatever I tell them to withhold. So for my own paychecks, I have them withhold nothing all year and then do all the withholding in December when I know exactly what needs to be withheld based on the year's income. That way, I get the use of my money all year, rather than giving the US Treasury an interest-free loan. I don't know if your employer will be as flexible, but it works for me.

      I'm sorry that you are having difficulty finding work. When I am looking for work, I typically just call everyone I know and tell them I need a job. Invariably, somebody either needs me or knows someone who needs me, or knows someone who knows someone... I think the technical term for it is "networking," but I just call it "putting food on the table."

      Good luck!

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    5. Re:Taxes by Pdj79 · · Score: 1

      Well, hopefully there won't be a next time...if you know what I mean. As for withholding, I usually have 0 exemptions on my W-4 for the first half of the year and then push it to 3 exemptions for 3 months and then 6 for the final 3 so that we can have more money for Xmas and come out even for the most part come tax time. If we get $4,000 back, I am happy (gotta love the Homestead Tax credit and tax-deductible mortgage interest). As for the job search, believe me, everybody and their mother has been notified to keep an eye out for any jobs. I've taken a few "under-the-table" contract gigs helping a buddy setup home/small business networks...its been alright, but not what I would consider a great long-term solution. I have a few interviews next week...but considering I've already done 10 with 3 giving me call backs and then nothing, I am a little weary of it all. Anyway, thanks for the pep talk.

  186. RadioShack workers did meet with their bosses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The e-mail was an invitation to a meeting. You knew if you got the e-mail for the meeting your position was being eliminated. No surprises. Everyone knew. The process had been discussed with the company as a whole and in meetings with your supervisor for 10 days prior. There was even an intranet site created for the situation, with FAQs, information about company support services and more. At the meeting following the notification, the laid-off workers still had the chance to see their supervisors "break down in tears" in person if that provided any sense of satisfaction. This is a great example of the news media taking something out of context and blowing it completely out of proportion. The employees liked finding out at the same time rather than having it drag out throughout the day. My aunt at Fidelity Mutual found out she was laid off when she arrived at work and couldn't log into her computer. A voice message told her she needed to report downstairs with her personal belongings, and when she arrived HR people were checking people out and giving them vouchers for a cab home. The cab line outside wrapped around the entire building. Now that is heartless. Give RadioShack a break for trying to do what was best for its employees.