Slashdot Mirror


Boy Scouts Introduce Merit Badge For Not Pirating

The_Slaughter writes "The MPAA has recruited the boy scouts of America to do their dirty work. Scouts will now be able to learn a merit badge for anti-piracy related activities, including creating public service announcements urging others not to steal movies or music. No word yet on if that includes helping the MPAA file lawsuits against 80-year-old grandmothers."

731 comments

  1. Scouts Honor.... by MECC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Scouts also must choose one activity from a list that includes visiting a movie studio to see how many people can be harmed by film piracy. They also can create public service announcements urging others not to steal movies or music." And complete a lobotomy.

    Do they also have merit badges for not thinking independently? Or one for having your IQ reduced to a single digit and being converted to a near-mindless automaton?

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Scouts also must choose one activity from a list that includes visiting a movie studio to see how many people can be harmed by film piracy.

      I wouldn't worry. When they see the true extent of the "harm" caused by movie and TV piracy, they'll be heading to thepiratebay.org the moment they're near a computer.

      Scouts will be instructed in the basics of copyright law and learn how to identify five types of copyrighted works and three ways copyrighted materials may be stolen.

      Cool, they'll be teaching them how to do it, too.

    2. Re:Scouts Honor.... by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

      My Republican oongressman would like the ym nick of any teen scouts having such badges.

    3. Re:Scouts Honor.... by MattGWU · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, it's called the "You don't HAVE to do any merit badges you don't want to do." merit badge. The one requirement is you DON'T DO THE BADGE. It's a total gimmie, it's great. Nobody is holding a gun to some kids head to do the badge.

      My prediction: If it's easy, scouts will do the badge. You don't have to believe in it, you just have to do it, and damn if there's nothing better than an easy merit badge for that extra Eagle palm or whatever.

      --
      "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    4. Re:Scouts Honor.... by OS24Ever · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wasn't in the boy scouts, but I was in the Explorer portion and that's how I got my private pilot license at 18.

      However, I feel that the scout organization has fallen so far from its original intended roots that it's nothing but a special interest shadow of its former self. It's very sad, because what once was an organization that helped kids learn about skills and camping and other simple yet vital tasks for a well rounded person have been hammered away into anti-gay, christian centric whored out to any group that wants type of thing.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    5. Re:Scouts Honor.... by curecollector · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...and I'm sure that if he hadn't recently passed away, one of my state's Democratic ex-Congressmen (Gerry Studds) would be interested as well.

      Why does this have to be a partisan issue instead of a cut and dry, "creepy old man" issue? Furthermore, what does this have to do with the BSA and the MPAA? Jeez.

    6. Re:Scouts Honor.... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Informative
      However, I feel that the scout organization has fallen so far from its original intended roots
      The organization is no more than the sum of its members.
      The two or three scout parents I know are the kind of old fashioned, independent thinking, screw-the-post-modernists sort of people whom you'd want to have around in case of actual emergency. Can't speak for their sons, whom I have not met.
      Succumbing to the moral dry-rot so rampant in contemporary America is something we have to eschew individually.
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    7. Re:Scouts Honor.... by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was going to say, I bet the pirates in the scouts will be the first ones earning a merit badge (in an ironic twist).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    8. Re:Scouts Honor.... by MECC · · Score: 1

      "You are also required to choose one activity from a list that includes gay sex, non-hetero sex and mutual masturbation with your brother."
      And whining like an anonymous coward about things you don't like on /.

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    9. Re:Scouts Honor.... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why does this have to be a partisan issue instead of a cut and dry, "creepy old man" issue?
      It's an election year for Congress, plus it's karmic retribution for the Lewinsky scandal.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    10. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      God forbid the Boy Scouts teach kids how to obey the law!

      Like it or not, people, pirating music, TV shows and movies is against the law. There's nothing wrong with this at all. If you want to change the law, work to change the law-- don't act as if the law doesn't exist at all.

    11. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      As has already been pointed out, this is NOT a Merit badge, it is a patch. Anyone can create a patch and offer them to anyone. It has nothing to do with whether the LA Boy Scouts want to earn the patch or not.

    12. Re:Scouts Honor.... by vought · · Score: 4, Interesting

      However, I feel that the scout organization has fallen so far from its original intended roots that it's nothing but a special interest shadow of its former self. It's very sad, because what once was an organization that helped kids learn about skills and camping and other simple yet vital tasks for a well rounded person have been hammered away into anti-gay, christian centric whored out to any group that wants type of thing

      Thanks for saying so well what I've felt often over the past fifteen years. Scouting is nothing more than bitter old men leading impressionable young men around anymore. It's almost like a page program for suburban and exurban white guys.

      I was a First Class Scout before leaving when I was 16, to spend more time bike racing. I enjoyed scouts because it let me get outdoors (I'd formerly beena roly-poly little fat computer nerd kid, and while I kept my computer nerd cred, scouts got me outside, working some of that flab off and seeing, doing, and loving the outdoors.

      As I crested Muir and Bishop Passes on consecutive days four summers ago, I thought a lot about my time as a scout. I'd never have learned to enjoy the outdoors were it not for my thoughtful and tolerant scoutmaster. Stuff like this - being a shill for big business - and the flaaaaaaming antigay rhetoric coming out of the Boy Scouts is a truly sad thing. The organization could do a lot of good for ALL young men if they chose to.

    13. Re:Scouts Honor.... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      depends on how much the republicans tried to cover it (and some other stuff) up. A certain level of wisecracks seems to make slashdot more fun for alot of us. Now if you want brillant witty insight on MPAA and BSA and other entainment cartels, let's just say the world at large may not tolerate the methods they would like to use to enforce their income stream, and the interference, monopolizing, economic disruption, and preferred-customre-status of the U.S. is getting more and more hated by the rest of the world each minute, and some of our cartels including banking may be in for a serious attitude adjustment.

    14. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

      Ha! You just thought about the merit badge, and therefore do not get it! (btw you guys all just lost the game, too.

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    15. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So do you think there should be a merit badge about not-breaking every law, or just the most important ones (murder/rape/filesharing)?

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    16. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Greventls · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The quality of the Boy Scouts depends on where you are. I was in the Boy Scouts in the Westmoreland Fayette Council up until 4 years ago(I turned 18). I was openly atheist and recieved Eagle. I knew of a couple openly gay members who also made it through to Eagle. No one cared. Everyone was openly accepting of everyone. I think these are select councils or troops run by extremely socially conservative people.

    17. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do they also have merit badges for not thinking independently? Or one for having your IQ reduced to a single digit and being converted to a near-mindless automaton?

      Hello Kettle, this is the pot, I'm sending you an MP3 of my new hit song, "You're Black and I'm Not".

      The LAST people who should be accusing others of not thinking independently are people who mindlessly justify stealing the work of others using some of the lamest excuses ever made. I doubt you can, but try reading some of these dicusssions and look for rational, well-thought-out opinions. Whenever music piracy comes up, it is generally 100% group-think.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    18. Re:Scouts Honor.... by adisakp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scouts will still be allowed to sing songs around the campfire during camping trips assuming that all use of music is properly accounted for with performance fees and royalties paid to the RIAA.

    19. Re:Scouts Honor.... by 644bd346996 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your comment almost perfectly hits the mark. The only thing is that there are still a few troops that accomplish the original purpose. They are actively being repressed by the higher levels, but there are ways to deal with them. It is only through the efforts of a few extremely patient and caring men, mostly Eagles, that some troops can stick to BP's ideals. Unfortunately, these men are almost entirely absent from the organization above the troop level.

    20. Re:Scouts Honor.... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm an Eagle Scout and I agree wholeheartedly. I'm proud of my Eagle and had a great experience in my (small) troop back in the day, but I refuse to donate any time or money to the BSA these days. Mostly, this is due to what I feel is an unforgivably intolerant stance towards gays, athiests, and agnostics and their almost-interolable exclusion of girl younger than Explorer-ages. On top of that -- as if it weren't enough -- there's crap like this. They really need to re-evaluate what they're doing and why. They've come dangerously close to being a knee-jerk, right-wing indoctrination organization. The program is still good at its core and lord knows kids need a way to get outside and learn life skills to supplement what's taught in schools, but I fear that the politics of the people running the show are getting in the way far too much.

    21. Re:Scouts Honor.... by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Excellent point

      When I was a boy scout (I would have had to stop due to age 2 years ago but I really stopped 4-5 years ago) my troop was a lot of fun. It wasnt the nerdy bunch that boyscouts were stereotyped as at the time (though there certainly were entire troups like that) but was really a bunch of good people. Had a lot of focus on camping and outdoors type stuff rather than pushing certain ideals and morals (well, there was still the good-doing ideals but nothing remotely like the anti-gay stuff). I never really advanced too far as I only went for merit badges I was interested in so I ignored a lot of the "required" merit badges like swimming since while I certainly can swim, it was a lot of time and foolish tests to prove I could swim rather than learning about something new with another merit badge. It was a lot of fun either way and the way the organization seems to be going these days makes me kind of sad.

      Something tells me that I wont be willing to be a scoutmaster by the time I have children...

      --
      Bottles.
    22. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Difference is, Clinton lied on numerous occasions.

      Only die-hard evangelist Christians really gave a shit that Clinton had an affair. Granted, people with a political agenda would have hammered him even if he'd told the truth from the get-go, however, I for one had no problem with it. I think cheating on your wife is an immoral thing to do, but I understand why some people might do it, and it doesn't really speak to his competence as a president. Lying under oath on the other hand is something I have a huge problem with. I think (although I can't offer any evidence) that most people felt the same way. If he had told the truth from the beginning, I would have defended him instead of calling for his resignation.

    23. Re:Scouts Honor.... by davmoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was in the Boy Scouts, from start to finish...started as a Cub Scout as soon as I could get in, stayed in until I was 21, and then served four years as a Scoutmaster. I was also in the OA, Explorers, and several other "side groups" (for lack of a better term). This was in the 60s through the 80s. I have nothing but fond memories of the experiences. There are **MANY** positive skills I learned and things I did that I would have never experienced without having been a Boy Scout.

      That was then, this is now.

      Now I'll echo what you say here. The organization has changed so much from what it was then that if I had children and they were to ask to be in Scouts, I'm not sure I would approve. I ceased donating even my money in the mid-90s.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    24. Re:Scouts Honor.... by tsjaikdus · · Score: 1

      A purple heart loses its value in about 35 years. The merit badge will undoubtedly be a far better investment. Then again, be a drunk and wear no badge at all, will make you win the elections.

    25. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, more likely to be like the kids in "Jesus Camp".

      You get to people young enough- you define who they are and what they feel is right and wrong.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    26. Re:Scouts Honor.... by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      "Why does this have to be a partisan issue instead of a cut and dry, "creepy old man" issue?"

      Uhh it was a simple joke! Your the only one making it a partisan issue. It's simply a matter of fact that the guy was a Republican and the Original Poster referred to him as such. You seem to object to this as partisan implying that he is highlighting the fact he was a Republican Congressman but then you yourself refer to it as a "creepy old man issue", highlighting the fact that he was male. Surely that is just as partisan!

      At the end of the day it was a joke. It is the media who prominently pointed out the guy was a Republican and to work jokes need to refer to the person who the joke is about through a reference people can identify. I laughed at the joke, wheras "Some creepy old man wants boy scouts ym nicknames" just isn't funny!

    27. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be fair, most troop leaders are average guys who are more interested in teaching kids how to tie knots and go camping. It's the higher ups who have gone completely off their rocker. I was a boy scout all the way until 18 and even then there were plenty of signs that the higher ups were not quite in touch with the real world. They used to have this funny requirement that the boys must believe in a monotheistic diety of some sort, although they were careful not to actually say "Christian God" outright. Down at the troop level that requirement was quietly swept under the rug. It's a shame the scouts have gotten saddled with this, because it is a great organization for teaching children leadership skills (patrol leaders have quite a big of responsibility) and a variety of useful skills for life. Everybody in the world should know how to tie a Bowline and Taut-line hitch, those two knots are invaluable in daily life.

      I guess the kids also get a lesson in how messed up upper management can be...

      Either way, no matter how messed up the Boy Scouts are, they still have nothing on the Girl Scouts. Talk about an organization that doesn't know what it's doing. They're still not sure if they should be teaching girls how to cook, how to camp, or how to not speak unless spoken to. It doesn't help that girls interested in the more exciting parts of scouting can join the Boy Scouts via the Venture program.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    28. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and bush hasnt lied?

    29. Re:Scouts Honor.... by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      > So do you think there should be a merit badge about not-breaking every law, or just the most important ones (murder/rape/filesharing)?

      Last time I checked you could get the First Aid merit badge even if you've never made an actual tourniquet in an actual situation where someone's lower leg was completely severed. While some merit badges are done showing you've completed something (Swimming requires you to swim a certain distance, Cycling requires a number of rides at different lengths), I believe a majority are done by showing that you've learned something, in many cases by actually doing it.

      That being said, I think that any time you want to talk about any media, there should be a discussion about rights. Hopefully the Merit Badge Counselors will make this discussion fair and balanced and not entirely built on corperate FUD.

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
    30. Re:Scouts Honor.... by loudmax · · Score: 1

      The two or three scout parents I know are the kind of old fashioned, independent thinking, screw-the-post-modernists sort of people whom you'd want to have around in case of actual emergency.

      Unless, of course, you happen to be a postmodernist.

      --
      KTHXBYE
    31. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However, I feel that the scout organization has fallen so far from its original intended roots that it's nothing but a special interest shadow of its former self

      I was a boy scout, got my Eagle, have been a Cub Scout leader for the last few years and just recently became the Varsity Team Coach (Varsity is the 14-15 year-old boys), so I have a very good view of what Scouting actually is, as opposed to what it appears to be in the press.

      My take is that your perception is driven primarily by the special interests who have decided to attack scouting based on the two tenets of the program they don't like: homosexuality and religion. The scouting organizations actually have very little problem with either of those, and spend no time at all worrying about them. The prohibition on homosexual and pedophile leaders is very sensible, in my opinion, and the religious position is both open (must profess faith in *some* god) and not really enforced.

      Scouting is a great program that does a tremendous amount of good. It's precisely because it's such a valuable program that people who object to a couple of its tenets like to attack it. Don't take their attacks to mean that the program has changed.

      Anyway, I need to get back to planning next year's High Adventure camp. We're going to do a week-long, 100-mile rafting trip, most of it through the inaccessible canyons of the Colorado River above the Grand Canyon. I'm actually not so much planning it as putting together the framework for planning it, because the boys will do the real planning themselves.

      That's what scouting is about. Self-sufficiency, outdoor skills, teamwork, preparedness and the moral strength and integrity that are developed by doing hard things in a place that no one can cover for you. Oh, and fun. Lots of fun.

      Doesn't stop people from trying to use Scouting to score political points, but we try to ignore those people.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    32. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a really hard time getting the merit badge for obeying the drinking age while I was a boy scout...I could have sworn that I had never had a drop but after the second DUI it became apparent that scoutmaster was spiking the apple juice before the private merit badge "counseling" meetings with the younger scouts...

    33. Re:Scouts Honor.... by scott_karana · · Score: 2, Funny

      What? All of Congress was involved with the Lewinksy woman? Sheesh, she gets around.

    34. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 0

      If you're so sure he has, why are you posting as an Anonymous Coward?

    35. Re:Scouts Honor.... by smclean · · Score: 1

      How did the parent engage in these mindless justifications of theft? He simply knocked the Boy Scouts.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    36. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Score+Whore · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Without getting too political, Bush has lied under oath as well. He swore to uphold the constitution, but then ordered that people be held without access to courts, attorneys, etc. It went to the Supreme Court and was deemed that those orders violated the constitutional rights of the people being held and the Bush administration then said "ok, we'll stop doing that." But the thing is, just because Bush felt that it was constitutional doesn't mean that it's OK until a court says otherwise. It means that he was in violation of those constitutional rights all along. Bush should be impeached for breaking his oath.

    37. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Pollux · · Score: 4, Insightful
      God forbid the Boy Scouts teach kids how to obey the law!

      As an Eagle Scout, I can say first-hand that the Boy Scouts DOES teach scouts how to obey the law. Here are a few examples:

      • One of the twelve points of the Scout Law (a moral code which all scouts pledge to follow and uphold) is that every scout is obedient, to leaders, and to the law.

      • Scouts, as they work towards their Eagle Scout rank, are required to obtain the Citizenship in the Community, Nation, and World merit badges (three separate badges) that teach scouts how the law is created, legal methods in changing and upholding law, as well as what it means to be good citizens in the community.

      However, I am personally sad to see special interest groups who are imposing a political agenda upon scouts. Once upon a time, scouting was about kids discovering themselves. While there was a core set of requirements which every scout was expected to achieve as they worked their way up the ranks (the basic skills of camping, first aid, being a leader...), there were hundreds of merit badges which scouts could work towards and earn, depending on what interests they had. A great example of this was when Spielberg, himself an Eagle Scout, helped create the Cinematography merit badge, for any scout who may have an interest in learning more about movie making. Looking back, the most amazing thing about scouts was all the opportunities I had to learn about new things, as well as all the people who willingly worked so hard to offer me those opportunities.

      Nowadays, I feel more and more that special-interest groups, including but not limited to the RIAA, are seeing scouting as a vehicle for "indoctrinating" their agendas onto future leaders of America (and believe you me when I say that Eagle Scouts truly are leaders). I was asked last year by a parent if I could be a merit badge counselor for the Computer merit badge. As the tech coordinator at my school, I thought it would be a great chance to catch-up with boy scouts again. I opened up the merit-badge book, and lo-and-behold, one of the requirements to obtain the merit badge was for scouts to be able to understand and give examples of piracy, whether it was burning CDs or P2P. This had NOTHING to do with learning about computers, how they work, learning about how to create documents, spreadsheets, and databases, and programming a computer. This was a political agenda, and it didn't sit well with me.

      Scouts are certainly educated every day about how to be obedient to the rules and be good citizens of this country. But I want scouts to find and grow their own ideals, not have them spoon-fed by the RIAA.
    38. Re:Scouts Honor.... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I've seen videos from the debate in the House of Representatives on Clinton's impeachment. One of the Republicans I saw talked about the lying(and that one only tangentially talked about it and the rest of the speech was about setting an example for children) and all the rest talked about the sex part. Although the lying was the more important issue in the scandal, it wasn't the issue the Republicans in Congress fixated upon. Hence, "karmic retribution".

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    39. Re:Scouts Honor.... by robyannetta · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Scouts also must choose one activity from a list that includes visiting a movie studio to see how many people can be harmed by film piracy.

      The scouts can drop by my microcinema studio and see how I release all my movies for FREE under a Creative Commons licence.

      Will they still get their badge?

      --
      - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    40. Re:Scouts Honor.... by rhaig · · Score: 1

      If you know anythign about the way that the BSA operates, it is not a Christian organization (though it does have some religious beliefs at it's core). They do not gay-bash (though there is national policy agains openly gay adult leaders). They do not teach that being gay is wrong (except passively through the national policy that in all my years as an adult scouter has never come up). Whored out? Well this badge creation is kind of troublesome, and while some point out that pirating these materials is in fact illegal, there are other badges that teach scouts about obeying the law. This badge is kind of annoyingly excess.

      and National is still about teaching boys outdoor skills and camping. There may be a few troops out there that are the bad apples (there's a few bad ones in any organization) as a whole, it's still a good program.

      --
      "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
    41. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there Mr. Pot. What about independent thinkers that are not suggesting people break the law, or that they only break the law in circumstances where the law is immoral?

      I'll bet that there will be a few creative Scouts that will earn this merit badge based on supporting alternative copyrights such as creative commons, GPL, etc. They'll be in the minority of the body of those who earn the badge, though. Then again, this badge won't be a requirement for rank, and probably won't be all that popular unless one of the troop leaders is a member of Metallica.

    42. Re:Scouts Honor.... by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sure he has; beginning with claiming that the US government had absolute proof that Iraq had an ongoing and widespread WMD program, when the evidence suggests that there was nothing of the kind: the worst even the most apologetic can come up with is evidence that they once had a widespread WMD program, and that they might have had tiny ongoing kitchen projects. The whole "preemption doctrine" was dependent upon that absolute proof, but every single non-radical-neocon in the intelligence community was telling him the evidence was very unreliable.

    43. Re:Scouts Honor.... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget claiming that he would always get a warrant before wiretapping.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    44. Re:Scouts Honor.... by kiddailey · · Score: 1
      The Boy Scouts have taught us to obey the law since it was started:

      A scout is trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent.

      You don't need any more than that, let alone a merit badge. The problem is that this particular badge is doing nothing more than empowering an entity with a vested monetary interest, to influence impressionable kids, and probably with half-truths about laws that the industry themselves lobbied for.

      Scouts will be instructed in the basics of copyright law and learn how to identify five types of copyrighted works and three ways copyrighted materials may be stolen.

      In the end, the only character development or learned skill gained from this badge will be that of a weasley, lack of common sense tatttletale.

      I'm sure glad my elders kicked my ass enough so that I was able to receive the Eagle rank back when there was still some respect for the organization.
    45. Re:Scouts Honor.... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Oh, I daresay even the most-postal post-modernist would become downright practical, bereft of his cushy little modern context.
      And I worked on a doctorate for a couple of years, so I know whereof I speak. ;)

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    46. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a big difference between saying "no I did not have relations with this woman" while knowing you did, and saying "I swear to uphold the constitution", and then doing something which in your opinion doesn't violate the constitution and then having someone else determine that it does. One is intentional, the other accidental. One is a deliberate lie, the other is an accidental failure to keep a promise.

      Unless, ofcourse, you can show that Bush deliberately set out to violate the Constitution.

    47. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      ...christian centric...

      Actually, they are religion centric - i.e. they require a belief in a supreme being but not any particular one. Interestingly enough, that caused problems for one scout and his parents who felt that discussions of " supreme being who gave us the earth" and certain Native American beliefs were not only wrong but dooming us all to hell. Fortunately, the troop did not cave to his desire to eliminate all references to anything except that which would be considered correct by fundamentalist Christians; he wound up leaving for another troop.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    48. Re:Scouts Honor.... by monoqlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't let this one go. Republican strategists tried for all 8 years of Clinton's presidency to nail him, they hated him so. The fact that the most credible charge they could come up with was lying about the Lewinsky affair(which was, I admit, stupid and unnecessary) is a testament to his relative integrity as a politician. He was under such heavy scrutiny from the Republican congress that they would have nailed him to the cross had he done something else even remotely as morally reprehensible. But none of preceding accusations levied against him held water, so they were left with the stupid Lewinsky tapes. This is not to excuse him, but to simply show that we once had a competent and relatively honest creature for our president.

      This all lies in contrast, of course, to our current president, whose resignation you apparently aren't calling for. He hasn't been held accountable for a single false, misleading, or outright deceptive public statement, of which there are plenty to cite. Some say that these lies have directly resulted in as many as half a million deaths. The only reason he has gotten away with them is because he has encountered virtually no resistance or scrutiny from Congress, and has skillful deceptive tactictians who, in a very real, cynical, Machiavellian sense, have artfully deceived the entire world, America included, into turning over as much power as possible to them and their cronies. Heavy accusations, I know. But unlike many of the Republican accusations against Clinton, these hold water.

      So what I suppose you are really complaining about is that Clinton got caught.

    49. Re:Scouts Honor.... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      I'm not the AC above, but I'm sure he's lied on several occasions.

    50. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do people lump homosexuals and pedophiles into the same group?

      As an adult hetrosexual male, do you have the desire to fondle a female child?

    51. Re:Scouts Honor.... by rhaig · · Score: 2

      or perhaps you should be a scoutmaster to show your kids and others what fun you used to have in scouts.

      --
      "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
    52. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...claiming that the US government had absolute proof that Iraq had an ongoing and widespread WMD program...

      In the context of your argument that you imply that Bush lied about the WMD program in Iraq, your argument is full of shit, bull-shit that is.

      You know damn well that the US sold WMD materials to Iraq. Where the hell are they?

    53. Re:Scouts Honor.... by rhaig · · Score: 1

      there are 3.
      Citizenship in the Community
      Citizenship in the Nation
      Citizenship in the World

      --
      "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
    54. Re:Scouts Honor.... by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      Well, I could show people the same things without being a scoutmaster but if the scouts keep going the direction they are going it might be hard to do that as a scoutmaster. If there is too much of a stigma against joining the scouts or the organization is just too fucked up, there would be no saving it.

      --
      Bottles.
    55. Re:Scouts Honor.... by michrech · · Score: 1, Interesting

      One is a deliberate lie, the other is an accidental failure to keep a promise.

      Doesn't matter -- A failure is a failure.

      If there was *any* question, he should have consulted his staff, or the court, BEFORE he decided.

      If he is such a "man of faith" (as he's blabbed about time and again), it should have been against his belief system to torture, hold people without due process, etc, in the first place.

      I have no doubt in my mind he has intentionally done everything he is hated for. I think the "stupid look" he portrays is just a cover for someone nearly as insane as Sadam, Hitler, etc. Difference here, I think, is he knows that the American people will yank him back HARD if he gets too crazy all at once, so he's just pushing a little at a time to see how far he can go.

      For *that*, he should have been removed (along with *all* of his cronies) long ago.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    56. Re:Scouts Honor.... by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      I would think keeping kids from getting access to differing points of view and other opinions would be more in tune with the spirit of your argument. How can they think independent if they don't know what the other side's position is? A truely independent thinker would learn all they are told, then they would sit down and weigh that against what they already know or have learned about pirating. How is that bad exactly? Giving people more information with which to base opinions on? So being an "independent thinker" in your mind is never learning anything that goes beyond your point of view?

    57. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Scouts are certainly educated every day about how to be obedient to the rules and be good citizens of this country. But I want scouts to find and grow their own ideals, not have them spoon-fed by the RIAA.

      I think it's great -- they'll learn early in life what it's like to have their ISPs unwillingly turned into unpaid cops deputized to spy on them and hold the results for two years in case the Republicans and their cronies ca make political or legal mischief out of them.

      However, I'm not sure how the BSA (hmmmm, maybe there's a connection -- same initials as the Business Software Alliance -- paid, priofessional snitches) reconciles their stand against homosexuality with teaching the kids to drop their cute little khaki shorts and turn themselves out when the **AA arrives on the doorstep.

      Aha!!! I know, it isn't gay if female **AA reps come and fist them.

    58. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Firehed · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a (former) Scout, I can pretty much be sure that's the case. The badge requirements for the Computers merit badge look as if they were written in about 1992 last I checked (before electronic mail was shortened to email...), so I never even really considered to bother with it, though that site says they were revised in 2004. The article was incredibly thin on details, though I'd be interested to find out a bit more. Like what the thing is called. Something tells me that "Respecting Copyrights" isn't going to fit between Archery and Citizenship in the Nation, but then again I earned Dentistry and Space Exploration without the use of a dental pick or spacesuit.

      I'd just like to know how many people would have any interest in earning the thing. I'm thinking that, aside from those 'have to earn them all' types, there will be very, very few.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    59. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jZnat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One is a deliberate lie, and the other has set us back hundreds of years.

      Yeah, I completely see how perjury is far more severe than shitting on the US Constitution on a daily basis while in the federal government.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    60. Re:Scouts Honor.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      think cheating on your wife is an immoral thing to do, but I understand why some people might do it, and it doesn't really speak to his competence as a president. Lying under oath on the other hand is something I have a huge problem with.

      I don't think that lying under oath is wrong in all situations, especially since if you don't take the oath they just throw the proverbial book at you. This is a case in which they were asking Clinton questions that were none of their fucking business. Answering them would have disgraced not only Clinton, but also his wife and his lover, not that she was too worried about disgrace - she was only concerned about money once the whole thing came to light.

      An old, old concept of honor is that you cannot reasonably be held to an oath made under duress of force, which is precisely what we're talking about here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    61. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "If there was *any* question, he should have consulted his staff, or the court, BEFORE he decided."

      Do you seriously beleive he didn't consult his staff?

      "If he is such a "man of faith" (as he's blabbed about time and again), it should have been against his belief system to torture, hold people without due process, etc, in the first place."

      Not really. What you call "torture" has was done in many past conflicts without anyone raising a peep. And holding "illegal combatants" indeffinitely isn't a violation of any laws. I suppose you would have preferred that we just execute them, since the Geneva Conventions say it's ok?

      "I think the "stupid look" he portrays is just a cover for someone nearly as insane as Sadam, Hitler, etc. "

      Well. You're certainly entitled to your opinion.

    62. Re:Scouts Honor.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There's a big difference between saying "no I did not have relations with this woman" while knowing you did, and saying "I swear to uphold the constitution", and then doing something which in your opinion doesn't violate the constitution and then having someone else determine that it does. One is intentional, the other accidental.

      Oh, it's all become clear to me now! Bush accidentally ordered and approved of illegal wiretaps against citizens of the United States! Bush has been accidentally allowing people to be incarcerated and held without trial! Silly me! I guess he just slipped.

      The only thing more offensive than a politician willing to tread all over our freedoms in order to make a buck is the apologists who excuse all of his wrongdoing because it fits their political agenda.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    63. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Fine then say "I refuse to answer that question".

      I'm sorry, I just don't beleive in deliberate lies. I got in trouble with the law a few times when I was younger, and I didn't lie even when I knew it could probably get me off with no consequences. Either answer the question truthfuly or refuse to answer, but don't lie.

    64. Re:Scouts Honor.... by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1

      While I agree that, yes, in fact, there are tolerant and thoughtful troops out there, the company line is pretty much bad news all-around. That's important, because it gives room for the whackos in the organization to move even further into forms of extremism and intolerance, and as policy it defines the enterprise as a whole. Similarly, while there are traditions of intellectual rigor, humanism, and kindness in most of the major world religions -- in some cases, vocal and prevalent strains -- in any critical analysis those traditions cannot be said to exemplify the historical practice, social significance or general outlines of those religions. Just as you must look at mainstream forms of a religion for socially relevant analysis, a look at mainstream Scouting shows it has really pushed into depressing and dangerous territory.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    65. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who say Bush "lied" have no concept about what it means. Clinton LIED under oath. That is what got him in trouble with most people and not Lewinsky.

    66. Re:Scouts Honor.... by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      True... but denying scouts access to "the other side" of issue, or at least saying they are hindering independent thinking is just as bad.

      A critical thinking should be able to make a forumalted decision based on as much information as possible? I think the best case scenario is a scout see his friends all downloading all kinds of movies, then goes to the movie studio and sees the other side... then goes back to his "thinking chair" and comes up with a conclusion that lands somewhere along the lines of what you're suggesting.

      I think denying people access to information just because it doesn't agree with your point of view is just as "lobotomizing" and hindering of independent thinking.

    67. Re:Scouts Honor.... by cynyr · · Score: 1

      I would agree that pedophiles as scout leaders is a bad bad bad idea... but i still do not see the problem with gay(yes i know this usually has a bad conotation, but trust me i use it very politly) men as scout leaders. Would you then also argue against gay women as scout leaders, boy or girl scouts, and how about the oppisite gender as a leader if they are straight?

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    68. Re:Scouts Honor.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Fine then say "I refuse to answer that question".

      That is not an option when in front of a grand jury.

      I'm sorry, I just don't beleive in deliberate lies. I got in trouble with the law a few times when I was younger, and I didn't lie even when I knew it could probably get me off with no consequences. Either answer the question truthfuly or refuse to answer, but don't lie.

      That's your value, not mine. I do not see the world in terms of black or white. If I'm doing something that's not harming anyone, and I get into trouble for it because the law is stupid, and I can get out of it by lying, fuck yes I will lie about it. IMO the only reason to say that you would never lie in a situation like this is if you agreed with every law on the books, or are willing to live in a fascist society that does not serve your needs. For instance, it's illegal to drink a beer on your front porch (in view of the road) in most jurisdictions, but this is clearly a stupid fucking law. If you could get away with getting away with it, why should you tell the truth? Just because a law is on the books does not mean it is just; just because a law is on the books does not mean it should be followed.

      I hear and understand what you're saying, mind you, I just think it's unrealistic. Life is not fair! I refuse to act as if it were.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    69. Re:Scouts Honor.... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I think it's readily apparent that he didn't set out specifically to violate the Constitution, but he doesn't have any problem at all overstepping his boundaries of his power.

      Exhibit 1: The Unitary Executive theories of John Yoo that this administration adheres too.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    70. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why do people lump homosexuals and pedophiles into the same group?

      They're not in the same group except in the sense that it's not wise to allow either pedophiles or homosexuals to be boy scout leaders.

      As an adult hetrosexual male, do you have the desire to fondle a female child?

      Have you ever seen a 16 year-old girl you'd like to fondle?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    71. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to agree. It's their game, they make the rules. I am sure what happened to Foley is not going to make them change their minds any time soon.

    72. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "For instance, it's illegal to drink a beer on your front porch (in view of the road) in most jurisdictions, but this is clearly a stupid fucking law. If you could get away with getting away with it, why should you tell the truth?"

      Because words like truth, honor, duty, and integrity actually have some meaning to me. But you're right, those are my values and not yours.

      "I hear and understand what you're saying, mind you, I just think it's unrealistic. Life is not fair! I refuse to act as if it were."

      I can't remember who said it but it went something like:

      "The man who does the right thing does it, not because he wants to change the world, but because he refuses to be changed by it."

    73. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Would you then also argue against gay women as scout leaders, boy or girl scouts, and how about the oppisite gender as a leader if they are straight?

      Female scout leaders aren't a good idea either, partly because of the sexual issues and partly because a lot of scouts is about men teaching boys how to be men, and women... aren't men.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    74. Re:Scouts Honor.... by tdelaney · · Score: 1

      So it's not lying to push a "think of the children" campaign while "thinking" of the children?

    75. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 0

      One is a deliberate lie, and the other has set us back hundreds of years.

      And how far has Clinton's perjury set back womens' rights?

      Sexual harasment on-the-job, short of rape with physical battery, is essentially a dead issue thanks to the "Clinton Defense". The remaining womens' rights organizations are discredited after their support for Clinton led them into the same blaming-the-victim behavior they decry (to the point of characterizing Clinton's accuser as "Trailer trash" and someone who should have been honored by his attentions.)

      I could go on with other political fallout. (It's part of what has enabled the looney fringe to take control of the Democratic party.) But I trust you get the point.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    76. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

      "Do they also have merit badges for not thinking independently? Or one for having your IQ reduced to a single digit and being converted to a near-mindless automaton? "

      Yes they do, it is in the Big Boyscout Book or Manliness, 1984 revision, between the homophobia merit badge and the Klan hood sewing badge.

                    -Charlie

    77. Re:Scouts Honor.... by patternmatch · · Score: 1
      [Homosexuals and pedophiles are] not in the same group except in the sense that it's not wise to allow either pedophiles or homosexuals to be boy scout leaders.
      Why is it not wise to allow homosexuals to be boy scout leaders?
    78. Re:Scouts Honor.... by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      No, you bastard! I just lost...

    79. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Arwing · · Score: 1

      I think the boy scouts in Hong Kong had that for a while.. ..

    80. Re:Scouts Honor.... by enjahova · · Score: 1

      Why can't a homosexual be a boyscout leader? Because he's... GAY??? If it's ok for someone to be gay, why isn't it ok for a leader to be gay? I've never understood this, I can understand some people think homosexuality is bad, thus they wouldn't want a bad leader, but why can't a homosexual be a leader if being homosexual is ok? It's not like homosexuality is taught, nor is it a communicable disease, so why can't a talented, well-meaning homosexual individual be a leader? Maybe once you've explained this I'll believe you about moral integrity, but so far I'm not really seeing much of it.

      --
      "how can they call it a MINE if everything here is THEIRS?!?!" -Straight Jacket
    81. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The prohibition on homosexual and pedophile leaders is very sensible

      That sounds a lot like my organization, which has a ban on blacks and murderers. Quite sensible.

    82. Re:Scouts Honor.... by HiThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People keep saying that.

      Voltaire was raised by the Jesuits, and people keep saying that.

      Adolph Schicklgruber grew up as a Jew. And people keep saying that.

      Statistically it may be true, but frequently there comes a time when a person decides to define himself by violently rejecting (some part of) what he was taught. The more coercively it was shoved down his throat, the more violent the reaction.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    83. Re:Scouts Honor.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      Dude, Clinton just said he did not have sex with that woman. In his mind oral sex wasn't sex, so in I suppose his mind he didn't lie either.

      Clinton's net result? One dirty dress that had to go to the cleaners.

      Bush's net result? Guys get sent to Gitmo without trial. Iraq gets invaded. More people die in Iraq since the USA went there than all the time Saddam was there. Now it seems the USA will run between its legs, like in Nam, and lets the whole place fall to pieces. Al-Qaeda is not the NVA, that's for sure. The place will probably turn into another Lebanon.

      Its a no brainer. I do not care if his Bush's infringment is intentional or not. To me he commited a crime, a severe crime which cost people's lives. Homicide in the 1st degree or 2nd, still a crime. He should have been removed from power and be thankfull of not going to jail for it.

    84. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Score+Whore · · Score: 1
      There's a big difference between saying "no I did not have relations with this woman" while knowing you did, and saying "I swear to uphold the constitution", and then doing something which in your opinion doesn't violate the constitution and then having someone else determine that it does.


      One could argue that one was not lying because spraying cum over some chick's face and dress is not having relations in your own opinion. But this is all a moot point due to the fact that on both articles of impeachment that were brought against President Clinton by the House of Representatives, he was acquitted in trial in the Senate:

      The Senate voted on the Articles of Impeachment on February 12, with a two-thirds majority, or 67 Senators, required to convict. On Article I, that charged that the President "...willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury" and made "...corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence" in the Paula Jones lawsuit, the President was found not guilty with 45 Senators voting for the President's removal from office and 55 against. Ten Republicans split with their colleagues to vote for acquittal; all 45 Democrats voted to acquit. On Article II, charging that the President "...has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice"..., the vote was 50-50, with all Democrats and five Republicans voting to acquit.


      Put it in a different context: You can kill someone in self defense. If a court decides that the person who was creeping around in your house in the middle of the night, the one that you accidentally shot in the head while attempting to shoot in them in the arm, wasn't actually a threat to you then you did the crime and you will have to face whatever penalties the law indicates are appropriate for your crime. Even though a) it was an accident, and b) you thought your life was at risk. You can't just say "Oops, sorry. I'll not do that anymore."

      While I would be completely willing to put my testicles in a thousand ton vice if Bush were found guilty (ie. I do not think 67 senators would vote to remove him from office), I think he should have to go through the processes and be subjected to the public scrutiny that comes along with it.
    85. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      even there thay say to download
      # Use a computer attached to a local area network or equipped with a modem to connect to a computer network or bulletin-board service such as Prodigy, CompuServe, or America Online. Send a message to someone on the network or download a program or file from the network.

    86. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why is it not wise to allow homosexuals to be boy scout leaders?

      It seems rather obvious to me... because the potential sexual interest, particularly between the leader and the older boys, may interfere in a variety of ways, some mild, some severe.

      Keep in mind that boy scouts are young men, not children.

      It's an issue that's simply best avoided.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    87. Re:Scouts Honor.... by rhaig · · Score: 1

      There are other youth organizations similar to scouts. There was at one time BP Scouts (Baden Powell Scouts) though they were not widely spread. Find a local group. Help out. teach what you know.

      --
      "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
    88. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1
      Lets start here.

      Now what could he say to get the people and congress to go into Iraq....hmmmmm....what could he say - how about

      "Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people's hope for freedom. Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror..."

      from here His Jan 2002 state of the Union speech.


      But wasn't he just getting bad information? Well, no he wasn't getting bad info, it just wasn't the info he wanted.

      So he went on the air and *lied* to the american people about Iraq's involement with terrorists. And if he would lie to start a war I have no trouble believing that he would lie about anything else. So, is that enough proff yet?

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    89. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      See my other responses in this thread.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    90. Re:Scouts Honor.... by monoqlith · · Score: 1

      I understand why you might think that. It is clearly due to a failure of the media and Congress to hold our adminsitration accountable that you still believe that the intelligence at the time supported their case for going to war.

      "Saying that he "lied about WMD's" for instance is nonsense, since all intel at the time indicated that they did indeed exist."

      Therre was plenty of credible intelligence at the time that said that he didn't, too. This is called "cherrypicking" intelligence. The justification that Congress voted for the war based on the same intelligence is true only because Congress was only able to look at the same intelligence that Bush himself was "looking at" - i.e. the intelligence that the administration selected because it supported the hypothesis that there were WMDs in Iraq. People within the intelligence community who disagreed with this statement were actively smeared - read: Joseph Wilson, who investigated connections between Saddam Hussein . Meanwhile there werep lenty of other assertions that the administration made or insinuated at the time to justify an invasion that didn't even have evidence, namely that Saddam was connected to Al Qaeda and was in some way direclty responsible for 9/11. See also: the Downing Street Memo, which proves that Bush was fixing intelligence around a decision that was made by neoconservatives as early as 1997 to remove Saddam Hussein from power once they had the chance. So I would call that deliberate lying. Just because it was done (at the time) with great dexterity and without leaving tracks doesn't mean it is less delibreate. Why don't you read this interview by PBS of Colonel Laurence Wilkerson. This man actually played in an integral part in *planning the war* and claims: "I participated in a hoax on the American people, the international community and the United Nations Security Council. How do you think that makes me feel? Thirty-one years in the United States Army and I more or less end my career with that kind of a blot on my record? That's not a very comforting thing."

      "Some say that these lies have directly resulted in as many as half a million deaths." Talk about "misleading public statements". Some people say the moon landing was faked. Doesn't mean it's true.

      A very reputable pollster recently showed with (according to him) 95% certainty that up to 650,000 Iraqi civilians have died since the war began, far exceeding the "official" body count.
      So I include myself among those people who believe that the real body count far exceeds the official one, which stands right now at 48,000 - a lower number indeed, but one that should still offend you.

    91. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen a 16 year-old girl you'd like to fondle?

      Sure, but somehow, I have managed not to. Are you saying that if you, a straight man, found yourself in a group of 16 year-old girls, you'd be unable to keep your hands off them?

      What you are implicitly asserting is that, unlike heterosexuals, homosexuals are unable keep their hands off anyone they find attractive. I guess you don't know any gay people. Oh wait, let me guess, some of your best friends are gay, right?

    92. Re:Scouts Honor.... by cliffmeece · · Score: 1
      and the religious position is both open (must profess faith in *some* god) and not really enforced.

      How is that open? And how does enforcing capitulation to *some* mythology help increase the values you mention later, like indepenedence, confidence, self-reliance and outdoor skills?

    93. Re:Scouts Honor.... by sfjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It seems rather obvious to me... because the potential sexual interest, particularly between the leader and the older boys, may interfere in a variety of ways, some mild, some severe.

      I think this statement illustrates the homophobia in our society in general and Scouts in particular. For example, few people would raise an eyebrow at a heterosexual male coaching a high school girl's basketball team. Yet somehow gay men are supposedly unable to control themselves when around young men. I am reminded one time when a gay friend of mine was presented with this issue by a homophobe who was deathly afraid he would get cruised if he was arounf gay men. My friend told him, "You know, none of you straight men are nearly as hot and irresistible as you think you are".

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    94. Re:Scouts Honor.... by witte · · Score: 1

      As a former (European) scoutmaster who read some of the BSA books, this doesn't really surprise me.
      BSA has strayed far from the original intents of the Scouting movement. (Independent thought - you said it)
      I will probably bleed karma for posting this, but there it is.

      Major kudos to any small independent scouting troops out there.

    95. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have a very good point.

      While 99% are successfully brainwashed, the wonder about humans is that 1% seem to do what they have to do regardless. Call it destiny, a sense of purpose, or being a sociopath.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    96. Re:Scouts Honor.... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. But was Bush under oath when he took the oath of office?

      I assume that chirping, crickety sound is you realizing that Bush has never lied under oath.

      Ladies and gentlemen, the defense rests.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    97. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, to answer 'Did you have an affair?' except to deny the charges would (politically) be the same as saying yes. Your opponents are just going to turn it around to 'If he didn't, then why doesn't he say he didn't, as he's got nothing to hide? Therefore he obviously did.'

    98. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      As a former scout and a leader, your post could not be more wrong. First, it's not good scout behavior to bash gays. Also, I will quote the scout law:

      "
      A Scout is Trustworthy.
      A Scout tells the truth. He is honest, and he keeps his promises. People can depend on him.
      A Scout is Loyal.
      A Scout is true to his family, friends, Scout leaders, school, and nation.
      A Scout is Helpful.
      A Scout cares about other people. He willingly volunteers to help others without expecting payment or reward.
      A Scout is Friendly.
      A Scout is a friend to all. He is a brother to other Scouts. He offers his friendship to people of all races and nations, and respects them even if their beliefs and customs are different from his own.
      A Scout is Courteous.
      A Scout is polite to everyone regardless of age or position. He knows that using good manners makes it easier for people to get along.
      A Scout is Kind.
      A Scout knows there is strength in being gentle. He treats others as he wants to be treated. Without good reason, he does not harm or kill any living thing.
      A Scout is Obedient.
      A Scout follows the rules of his family, school, and troop. He obeys the laws of his community and country. If he thinks these rules and laws are unfair, he tries to have them changed in an orderly manner rather than disobeying them.
      A Scout is Cheerful.
      A Scout looks for the bright side of life. He cheerfully does tasks that come his way. He tries to make others happy.
      A Scout is Thrifty.
      A Scout works to pay his own way and to help others. He saves for the future. He protects and conserves natural resources. He carefully uses time and property.
      A Scout is Brave.
      A Scout can face danger although he is afraid. He has the courage to stand for what he thinks is right even if others laugh at him or threaten him.
      A Scout is Clean.
      A Scout keeps his body and mind fit and clean. He chooses the company of those who live by high standards. He helps keep his home and community clean.
      A Scout is Reverent.
      A Scout is reverent toward God. He is faithful in his religious duties. He respects the beliefs of others."

      He RESPECTS the belief of others. The scouts ask you to take your religion....whatever it is....to be one of the top things in your life. The word God is not a Christian word. Jew's use it and so do other religions. Even the Muslim Allah is God. The word GOD should not be an offense to anyone other then atheists who do not believe in any god. There's nothing in the scout handbook that is anti gay. The only reason that the gay leader issue came up was some misguided parents think that all gays are pedophiles. On the leader application, there's no line asking what your sexual orientation is! You can stay in the closet and be a leader. Pass the Youth Protection Training course and understand that as a adult leader, your never to be alone with a scout. Always 2 leaders.

      Now, I think that piracy is wrong. No if and or buts about it. It's CONTRARY to being a good scout! The Scout Slogan is DO a good turn daily. How is downloading a movie from P2P doing a good turn? The subjects of the badge are valid! People CAN be hurt by rampant downloading. If it continues. For those who say it sells more movies....your wrong. I know some people that after downloading it, they burn it to DVD on their own and never buy it. The only ones who say they do have some weird values......if you want to see if a movie is good enough to buy, rent it from netflix or someplace else.

      The only reason I am against SOME of the MPAA actions is that I want the RIGHT to watch the movie on Linux and on any portable device I buy be it a iPod, laptop, Zune...

      --

      Gorkman

    99. Re:Scouts Honor.... by HUADPE · · Score: 1
      If there was *any* question, he should have consulted his staff, or the court, BEFORE he decided.

      Well, his staff he did consult...but they have the bias of working for him and having suggested the unconstitutional act in the first place. Courts are a different case however. Federal courts do not give advisory opinions. In order for a judge to make a ruling on any matter, there must be a plantiff and defendant. Period. This (among other things) prevents courts from ruling acts constitutional or unconstitutional without both sides being heard, and also assures that issues courts are ruling upon actually impact people.

      --
      This sig has not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not designed to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease.
    100. Re:Scouts Honor.... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      And how far has Clinton's perjury set back womens' rights?

      Not one bit.

      Sexual harasment on-the-job, short of rape with physical battery, is essentially a dead issue thanks to the "Clinton Defense".

      Bullshit.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    101. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fifteen posts until someone starts to blame Clinton. is this a new record?

    102. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      For example, few people would raise an eyebrow at a heterosexual male coaching a high school girl's basketball team.

      Perhaps not... but it's no coincidence that the vast majority of girls' coaches are women.

      I don't see any homophobia, or even any implication that homosexuals are less able to control themselves. Just avoidance of potential issues -- like the requirement that there always be two leaders present.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    103. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to see that there is an occasional sensible person visiting slashdot. Thanks for speaking up.

    104. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The scouts ask you to take your religion....whatever it is....to be one of the top things in your life.

            Provided you actually have a religion and aren't an atheist. Because atheists' beliefs don't count. They're not worthy of respect.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    105. Re:Scouts Honor.... by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1
      Granted, people with a political agenda would have hammered him even if he'd told the truth from the get-go,

      No shit, Sherlock.

      During the Clinton administration the dirty Repugs spent 140 hours of Congress's time investigating 'abuses' of Clinton's Xmas card list. That's 10 times as much time as they spent on the Abu Ghraib scandal.

    106. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only in "backward" America Scouting is still separated into gender... BSA vs. WAGGGS. The rest of the world is mixed gender Scouting, except for a few real third-world places. And to prevent issues of sexual relationships between (male/female/gay/lesbian) leaders and the boys and girls, we only accept asexual leaders... Yeah right...

    107. Re:Scouts Honor.... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      It seems rather obvious to me... because the potential sexual interest, particularly between the leader and the older boys, may interfere in a variety of ways, some mild, some severe.

      But most pedophiles who molest boys label themselves as heterosexual, and usually have wives. Meanwhile, many homosexuals are able to not think of children as sexual objects. Are you saying that only men should teach boys, and only women should teach girls?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    108. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I think it's a bad idea for a heterosexual man to lead a bunch of 16 year old girls camping. It would also be a bad idea for a homosexual man to lead a bunch of 16 year old boys camping. There's no bias here.

    109. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      What you are implicitly asserting is that, unlike heterosexuals, homosexuals are unable keep their hands off anyone they find attractive.

      No, that's what you'd *like* me to be implictly asserting.

      The simple fact is that it's just much better to avoid the issues entirely.

      I guess you don't know any gay people. Oh wait, let me guess, some of your best friends are gay, right?

      Neither, actually. No gay friends outside of my family, some gay relatives who I get along well with.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    110. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen a 16 year-old girl you'd like to fondle?

            There's a big difference between wanting to do something and actually doing it. I'd love to get hammered every night. I'd love to screw very pretty girls even if they're not over 21. I'd love to kill some people. I'd love to rob a bank. But I don't do it because it goes against my principles. The minute thought crime laws go into effect we are ALL going to jail no exceptions.

      If you deny ever having illegal or immoral feelings this you are not even honest to yourself.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    111. Re:Scouts Honor.... by risk+one · · Score: 1

      Yarrrr, me first badge, Oi been waitin' all me life fer this moment...

    112. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      It went to the Supreme Court and was deemed that those orders violated the constitutional rights of the people being held and the Bush administration then said "ok, we'll stop doing that."

            And then he created a new law that allowed him to keep on doing just what he'd been doing...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    113. Re:Scouts Honor.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Because words like truth, honor, duty, and integrity actually have some meaning to me. But you're right, those are my values and not yours.

      Oh, they have value to me, too. However, to me "duty" does not mean "following laws which make no sense and which are actually harmful to society" and "integrity" means to live by my beliefs, not by yours. Your rhetoric continues to be underwhelming. Now let's talk about truth and honor. Truth, well, truth is subjective so I'll not go into it now. Honor to me means not going back on your word. I never promised to follow bullshit laws, so my honor is not compromised by lying to avoid being penalized for not following them.

      Your attempt to paint me as a dishonorable individual because I'm willing to lie in situations in which I shouldn't be asked a question at all is ridiculous, because I am not a sheep. I make my own decisions and I don't need the court to tell me about right or wrong. If you do, then I have nothing but pity for you.

      I can't remember who said it but it went something like: "The man who does the right thing does it, not because he wants to change the world, but because he refuses to be changed by it."

      Obeying an unjust law is not the right thing, it is the wrong thing. Allowing yourself to get in trouble for doing something that does not hurt anyone is not the right thing, it is the stupid thing - unless you really want to be a poster child for civil disobedience.

      Now, ignoring unjust laws, and being unrepentant - that is the right thing to do, at least in my book. So what we have here is a clash of ideologies, in which we each believe the other is missing something important. You think I'm missing honor, but I keep my word when given, so clearly that's a matter of definitions. I think what you're missing is a willingness to grasp reality and manipulate it, instead you are ruled by it. I think what is needed here is an agreement to disagree.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    114. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      That's my point. So it's better to avoid placing leaders and boys in situations where their feelings may lead to trouble. Of course, no solution can completely avoid problems, but partial solutions are better than none.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    115. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Bush has been accidentally allowing people to be incarcerated and held without trial!

            It seems to me the US has forgotten the lessons learned in the Vietnam war. Oh how we suffered with those soldiers detained for years in Vietnam. How the hell do you think the families of the people detained at Guantánanmo feel? Better yet, don't ever let those people go - how happy do you think they will be with a country that held them for years? Guantanánamo is the breeding ground for tomorrow's REAL terrorist leaders.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    116. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      But most pedophiles who molest boys label themselves as heterosexual, and usually have wives.

      Your point? Pedophiles are also excluded from being leaders. As are felons.

      Meanwhile, many homosexuals are able to not think of children as sexual objects.

      Boy scouts are young men, not children.

      Are you saying that only men should teach boys, and only women should teach girls?

      In some circumstances. Scouting is one of them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    117. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know, what it really comes down to is the fact that the Boy Scouts is a private organization that stands for certain things. If it seems that one of those things is that homosexuality is wrong, so be it. You don't have to like it. But you don't have the right to criticize those who choose to participate in the Boy Scouts. The Boy Scouts certainly doesn't teach young men to hate homosexuals. They are taught to be kind and considerate to all people of all faiths, sexual orientations, ethnicities, etc. However, they are also taught that certain things are right and certain things are wrong. You don't have to agree but you ought to be tolerant to other schools of thought as that is what most gay advocates are claiming is an injustice done against them.

      To all of those who are claiming that this kind of teaching of young men is nothing but brain-washing and indoctrination I want to say that it's too bad that you feel that way. It used to be that adults felt the obligation to teach children and teenagers the things that they view are important in life. Those things have traditionally been things such as hard work, kindness, honesty, religion, etc. It's too bad that it's getting to where most parents simply turn their children loose on the streets and proclaim that their kids are free to do as they choose and become the people they want to be. Young people need guidance. If it's not from parents, teachers, coaches and religious leaders it's going to be from gangs and hoodlums on the streets. More people should give some good hard thought to which of those people you'd like to have teaching your kids. I would choose the Boy Scouts of America any day.

      I applaud the BSA for standing its ground and maintaining the moral standards upon which it was founded.

    118. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in the Sea Scouts which is part of Boy Scout except they are concentrating on seafareing and I never seen a commerical organisation gives us anything for badges except for donations. I would rather have an donation to keep Boy/Sea Scout for upkeep of their operation than a merit badge for "stopping piracy". IMHO this is nothing but an publicity stunt on the part of the MPAA which has nothing to do with scouting.

    119. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, these councils and troops who do come out anti gay and making you be a Christian (NOT a national policy by any means) are not actually following the TRUE scouting principles. Making anti gay remarks or remarks against any person is not good scouting behavior. The only thing that the scout law asks of scouts is that they put their religion at a high level of importance....whatever it is. You CAN say they ask that you believe in god.....not the Christian God, the Jew God or Allah....GOD. The only people who may have an issue is atheists and your post advertises this well. Atheists, Gay Scouts and others should not be turned away. Also, as I am a leader now, there's NO WHERE on the form where it asks your sexual orientation. It does ask that you make a commitment to a religious faith and anything concerning religion in the scouts is non sectarian. Also, as the BSA is also a part of World Scouting, there's no rule in the BSA that states you MUST be a Christian. They just ask that you hold a religious belief. Don't believe me? Read the leadership application: http://www.scouting.org/forms/28-501D.pdf

      BSA gets a bad rap because of some councils that have some ass hats running them.

      --

      Gorkman

    120. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The man who does the right thing does it, not because he wants to change the world, but because he refuses to be changed by it."

      And that means - do the right thing that YOU feel is right. This quote actually argues against you if you really look at it. It says that you need the integrity to determine what is correct, and the will to stand by it.

      Not to allow your own personal code of ethics to be determined by a set of external "laws" derived by the world, that can change at any moment. This what I read in the above quote. You refuse to be changed by what the "world" says is correct (ie - sometimes stupid, inane laws - such as Alabama Section 13A-12-1, which says you cannot "engage in shooting, hunting, gaming, card playing or racing on Sunday" ) but live your life according to integrity, honor and respect. Refusing to compromise your values when sometimes others (that this can be stupid laws) tell you.

      I choose to live honorably and with integrity, and I do not think that means I MUST tell "the truth" to a idiot who is enforcing some stupid rule they believe on me.

    121. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Tycho_Atreides · · Score: 1

      >>You get to people young enough- you define who they are and what they feel is right and wrong.

      Not really, especially in when the one doing the teaching isnt the child's own parent. Every kid I know had to take the DARE class in middle school and at least 90% of them later dismissed it as bullshit.

    122. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Sexual harasment on-the-job

            Sexual harrassment is not having a fuck in the workplace, or staring at someone's backside.

            It's using your power and authority to coerce a subordinate into unwilling sexual contact OR ELSE...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    123. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Jalestra · · Score: 1

      Not really. What you call "torture" has was done in many past conflicts without anyone raising a peep. Slavery was done in the past without anyone raising a peep...so you're saying it's ok now?

      --
      I'll be enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it
    124. Re:Scouts Honor.... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps not... but it's no coincidence that the vast majority of girls' coaches are women."

      According to the statistics at least 10% of those women may be Homosexual, so whats your point?

      "I don't see any homophobia"

      Sometimes when we don't see things its because we don't want to see them, not that they are not there.

    125. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Don't forget claiming that he would always get a warrant before wiretapping.

            Be honest. He got at least one.... but he figured he couldn't be bothered to get the rest.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    126. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Female scout leaders aren't a good idea either, partly because of the sexual issues and partly because a lot of scouts is about men teaching boys how to be men, and women... aren't men.

      Hmmm, it seems like the important thing is an interest in creating mentoring relationships. I agree that there are cases where certain mentoring relationships could get complicated (a college girl mentoring a high school boy). As long as it was clear that the relationships were about mentoring and nothing else, though, I don't really see a problem. For that matter, when I was in high school I probably could have really benefited from having a college girl give me some advice on how to interact with girls.

      Regardless, of gender/age/sexual orientation/etc it seems that a boy is going to have to choose his mentors carefully and recognize that one mentor may not be good for everything. That is, a boy should find different mentors for different areas of his life and sometimes that mentor should be older or male or whatever and sometimes not.

    127. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to the statistics at least 10% of those women may be Homosexual, so whats your point?

      Homosexual girls' coaches also don't get to keep their jobs, or at least have to deal with restrictions like not entering the girls' locker room while the girls are changing.

      Sometimes when we don't see things its because we don't want to see them, not that they are not there.

      And sometimes when we do see things it's because we want to see them, not that they are there.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    128. Re:Scouts Honor.... by idsofmarch · · Score: 1
      You're arguing intent, as if Bush just tripped and accidentally violated the Constitution or just had a old manuscript version lying around. I disagree, I think the Bush administration knew they were violating the US Constitution and figured they could use secrecy to cover their collective asses. This is far more a threat to democracy than Clinton lying about diddling an intern.

      Both of them are liars, but one did it to cover an affair, the other did it to subvert Democracy.

      I agree, there's a big damned difference.

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    129. Re:Scouts Honor.... by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      it doesn't really speak to his competence as a president.

      It speaks very much to his competence as a president. The scandal completely undermined his relationship with Congress and left him essentially ineffective during the last half of his second term in promoting any kind of agenda.

      You might blame Congress for overreacting, but someone who is competent for the highest political office in the country would be able to avoid such a huge and obvious political mistake.

      There are two other points that differentiate this from a standard affair: First, a relationship between a boss and a subordinate is always inappropriate because there is an imbalance of power that makes it more difficult for the subordinate to refuse consent to begin or continue the relationship. A relationship between an intern and the most powerful man on earth could not be more imbalanced.

      Second, someone trying to hide something is susceptible to making decisions for the wrong reasons and susceptible to blackmail by the people who know the secret. Someone with that much authority should not compromise himself in that way when it is so easily avoided.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    130. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Some_Llama · · Score: 2, Funny

      "While 99% are successfully brainwashed, the wonder about humans is that 1% seem to do what they have to do regardless."

      This is why the oracle was introduced, to weed out that 1% that kept rejecting the program so that they might be purged from the system to keep the balance. Then when Zion was destroyed the one would pick 11 people to rebuild and we'd start over again.

    131. Re:Scouts Honor.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      It seems to me the US has forgotten the lessons learned in the Vietnam war. Oh how we suffered with those soldiers detained for years in Vietnam. How the hell do you think the families of the people detained at Guantánanmo feel?

      That's pretty irrelevant, we've been creating terrorist so long that you might say it's one of the things we're best at. We gave Saddam piles of money, large amounts of equipment, and provided training to his troops. Ditto for Osama - we gave the Taliban some huge pile of money to stop Opium production in Afghanistan, which they actually did... for one year, or so the chart I saw last time said. Then it picked up right back to where it would have been, approximately, if they had done nothing, as if that year had never happened. We also provided them other funds, and a pretty significant amount of training.

      Really, nothing we can do at gitmo will have an impact on terrorism that we can even notice when compared to the things we're well known for doing on a regular basis already, unless we actually got some useful intelligence out of the people we're holding there.

      But no, the real reason not to have places like guantanamo is the chilling effect they have on the morale of the american people. Incidentally, this is also the best reason TO have them, if you're trying to run a repressive government and you want to scare people into falling into line, and I think that's the real reason we've heard so much about it recently. They want us to pee ourselves on a daily basis so we don't go and interfere with the illegal things they're doing to the citizenry, let alone prisoners of war and other people who supposedly don't qualify for the rights that US citizens get.

      But I'd like to quote a bit from the Declaration of Independence:

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

      This document says that all men are created equal. It does not say that people from outside your country do not have the same rights to life and liberty; it says all men and that is definitely intended to include women - Just trying to head off any attacks along those lines :)

      Anyway, obviously we don't really believe that sort of thing, or places like gitmo wouldn't even exist...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    132. Re:Scouts Honor.... by dan828 · · Score: 1

      It's an election year for Congress, plus it's karmic retribution for the Lewinsky scandal.

      Oh, BS. Scandals driven by partisan politics have been with us since the begining of this country. To try and frame one polititcal party as having started it all is completely and utterly disingenous.

    133. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Next up, they'll expand the badge to cover software piracy. Then the BSA can be become a propaganda arm of the BSA as well.

      --
      Suggestions for new C++ error messages, #18: "It's just an object. Doesn't mean what you think."
    134. Re:Scouts Honor.... by vinn01 · · Score: 1

      +5 , right on.

      The asshats have no honor. Hate has no part in the roots of scouting.

    135. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, like the Jews, they are a minority and blaming problems on them is therefore easy. Mark Foley? The party line: "oh, the problem there wasn't that he was a child molestor. No, no no no, not at all. It was that he was a homo and we HATE homos! See! Look, I'm married, I am a married man, not a child molestor. Those damn, dirty fags..."

    136. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      One thing that was important to me is that this particular badge is only in the LA area council. I thought National had to be the one to do the badge manuals. I did not think A council could have a specific Merit Badge. Oh sure, some councils and packs/troops have a specific award for something done like a special badge for attending a event or a special award for winning the council pinewood derby or something like that, but the main awards....the one where you have to get a book and go work with a merit badge councilor and the ones that go on your sash are usually approved by the BSA.

      --

      Gorkman

    137. Re:Scouts Honor.... by modecx · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between saying "no I did not have relations with this woman" while knowing you did, and saying "I swear to uphold the constitution", and then doing something which in your opinion doesn't violate the constitution and then having someone else determine that it does. One is intentional, the other accidental. One is a deliberate lie, the other is an accidental failure to keep a promise.

      Hey, you and I an everyone else can be charged with purjery if we mis-represent our income taxes and other government papers, of all things, and this shithead can make an oath on the bible, in front of the courts, and in front of the nation--and it's suddenly a failure to keep a promise?!

      He shits all over the constitution, self defined as The Supreme Law of the Land, and it's a failure to keep a promise?!

      Holy Mother Fucking Christ! Your mother should have dropped your on your head from a greater height!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    138. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Americano · · Score: 1
      If there was *any* question, he should have consulted his staff, or the court, BEFORE he decided.

      I'm genuinely curious what you feel should have been done, then. Should he have told the military & law enforcement that they couldn't detain or capture anybody, no matter how much suspicion and evidence they had, because he had to figure out with the courts what to do with detainees?

      Or should we have simply killed them all and let God sort it out? A simple double-tap to the back of the head, Sopranos-style, to make sure there's nobody to file a suit?

      To say "we can't do anything until we deliberate with the finest legal minds and weigh all aspects of this delicate, nuanced constitutional theory & precedent," is a little disingenuous. I don't like the decision to try and keep detainees indefinitely without a trial, and I think the federal courts made the right decision... but I'm also quite all right with somebody being detained while the courts sorted out the issue.
    139. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dare doesn't really use good brainwashing techniques.

      Isolation, social pressure from the already trained, absolutely no counter examples, lack of sleep.

      Dare has a lot of counter programming in society-- Dope is perceived as "fun", "entertaining", "get you laid" in movies and games a lot (sure- also "get you killed" but kids are immortal or so pissed at life they don't care).

      Likewise, Pot is so *clearly* less dangerous than cigarettes and alchohol (and less intoxicating usually given the way people use it) that Dare just comes across as stupid. And it cuts down respect for any OTHER message those authority figures try to deliver since it is so clearly bogus. Sure mescaline and heroin are dangerous-- but since the same cheesehead told you pot was bad, how can you be sure before you are dead or addicted.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    140. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However, I feel that the scout organization has fallen so far from its original intended roots that it's nothing but a special interest shadow of its former self. It's very sad, because what once was an organization that helped kids learn about skills and camping and other simple yet vital tasks for a well rounded person have been hammered away into anti-gay, christian centric whored out to any group that wants type of thing.

      Your comments make it clear you weren't in the Scouts. They are neither an anti-gay nor Christian-centric group. There are many Jewish temples and even at least one American Muslim mosque I know of that sponsor Scout troops in the US. They expect young men to have a belief in God and to live a morally righteous life. Is that a problem?
      Adult homosexuals are not allowed in leadership positions because Scout parents won't stand for it. But, I know there are more than a few boys in Scouting that later in their life "come out". Remember, most Scouts are under 16, and need not be exposed to alternative lifestyles. Let them be be boys, and when they become adults, make their own choices.
      The Scouts still do teach essential skills, in many different areas of life. Outdoor skills are just one example. Those skills are often taught by adult volunteers, not paid lobbyists pushing an agenda.

      It's a shame so many on here think the Scouts are nothing more than a punching bag for the secularists in this country. It's still a great organization and I am proud that my two sons have gone through the entire program, each earning Eagles. After college and being in the working world, both realized that the Eagle rank they earned served them well. Each have said that they received job offers as a direct result of mentioning their achievment on their resumes. In each case, interviewers told them that was a big plus.
    141. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Dana+Dare · · Score: 1

      Nah... The ONLY reason that GWBush hasn't (yet) lied "under oath" -- or had his people to do so -- is that he refuses to allow himself, or them, to be sworn in. Why, if HE believes he IS an honest man -- with an honest administration -- would he refuse? Hmmm...?

    142. Re:Scouts Honor.... by caffeine_high · · Score: 1
      They just ask that you hold a religious belief.

      As an atheist I don't see this as an acceptable requirement. It is discrimination.

      --
      The smarter home exchange, http://switchhomes.net
    143. Re:Scouts Honor.... by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are right--homosexual != pedophile.

      However, swillden was also right to state that there *is* a sensible, non-homophobic reason why Boy Scouts shy away from homosexual scoutmasters. When was the last time you saw a *male* hetero scout master taking a group of Girl Scouts camping?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    144. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      DISCLAIMER: I think Clinton is a fucking weasel, I hated him as soon as I heard him say "...but I did not inhale".

      Difference is, Clinton lied on numerous occasions.

      No, difference is Clinton did it with a conscenting adult.

      If he had told the truth from the beginning

      But he was being accused of sexual harassment, and questioned in a way to shape his answers so that it would seem like what he did was non-consenting.
      A chick offered him a blowjob, that ain't harassment, but "did you have sexual relations with that woman" makes him answer "yes" in an investigation where the implied question is "are you a sexual predator".

      I'm not following the whole page thing closely, but I bet the guy didn't com clean on his own, that he lied on numerous occasions too.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    145. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jafac · · Score: 1

      It's an issue, because Hastert was told about it - the issue was KNOWN about, and it involved more than just Foley's (new R congressman from IL is now referred to the Ethics committee for page relationships) - and instead of censuring Foley, they took hush money under the table from his campaign committee.

      THAT'S why this is a partisan issue. When this crop of Republicans screw up, they sweep it under the rug, invoke "executive privilege" or "National Security" - attack the whistleblowers, and cover it up.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    146. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jafac · · Score: 1

      Bush lied under oath when he swore to uphold the Constitution.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    147. Re:Scouts Honor.... by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Informative


      I am an Eagle scout, troop 171. I also spent time in troop 343.

      I loved boy scouts. I really had a good time. I was in it all the way from cub scouts, up till my 18th birthday. I still use a lot of the knowledge I gained in scouting - aside from the camping skills, I learned how to camp, and how to tie knots (which comes in handy more often than you'd think), and a number of other skills. The leadership experience was also very important in building me into the person I am today.

      However, before I sound like an advertisement for scouts, the point where it started turning down hill was when they introduced "Family Life" merit badge. I think it was while I was a scout - it wasn't in my handbook, but you had to get it to get your Eagle. We all kind of looked at it like it was just an excuse to have the parents do part of the dirty work - part of the merit badge is having "the talk" (both the sex one and the drugs one) with your parents. I look back now and see that it's the religious influence that was probably slipping talks about responsible abstinence and sexuality into a club which otherwise dealt with how to build a good fire, or which boot and sock configuration would avoid the blisters, or how to splint a finger or put your arm in a sling. It comes from the fact that most of the top scouts decision makers now are Mormons. I think something like 2 out of every 5 scouts, maybe more, are mormons. The mormon church has in part co-opted scouts to be part of it's youth program. There's nothing wrong with Mormons, of course, but organized, denomination-specific christianity should not be an integral part of a scout program.

      I'm also very dissapointed with the boy scouts' dual standard of government status. I was never a part of a troop that met in a public building (both my troops, and my pack, were church-affiliates), but some boy scout troops meet in schools, for free. Well, the deal is if you use government property for free, you need to conform to government regulations, which includes anti-discriminatory regulations. However, when the scouts want to keep the gays out, they claim private organization status. You can't have your Jamboree at Fort A.P. hill, and rent a government base (and use a lot of government labor) for free one minute, and the next minute, say that homosexuals can't be scouts. Or that people who don't believe in God can't be scouts (not "a god" or "any god" or "a higher power", but "The GOD(tm)").

      Thankfully, if there is a saving grace for boy scouts, it's that individually, on a troop level, most of the crap is ignored. I've never been near a troop that forced any religion on anymore, or that wussified scouting on purpose. Our weekly meetings were either talking about the camping trip that just happened, or planning that awesome cold-weather backpacking trip next month. We ran obsticle courses, we learned first aid, we had discussions of good citizenship and community envolvement. We did service projects - we fixed homeless shelters' food pantries, we made handicapped ramps for churches, we cleared overgrowth for city parks. To me that's what scouting is about.

      I think what we have here is a case of individual scouting practices on a troop level probably will forego the crap that people are worried about - it's the top level that is out of line here. Also, let me point out that this story is about boy scouts of Los Angeles, and I don't think this is on a national level.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    148. Re:Scouts Honor.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Because words like truth, honor, duty, and integrity actually have some meaning to me.

        There's nothing in that statement that binds one irrevocably to upholding the law of whatever jurisdiction one might be in. Indeed, it could be argued that sometimes fighting the law at the time is upholding the same concepts. There's certainly a lot of historical precedent, even in the sanitized versions of American history ;-)

        While I don't doubt your commitment, I don't think you have your priorities straight, as to why you fight for.

        "The man who does the right thing does it, not because he wants to change the world, but because he refuses to be changed by it."

        Which implies personal decision on the ethical and moral implications of laws, all by itself.

      Cheers,
      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    149. Re:Scouts Honor.... by kchrist · · Score: 2, Informative
      You can't have your Jamboree at Fort A.P. hill, and rent a government base (and use a lot of government labor) for free one minute, and the next minute, say that homosexuals can't be scouts.

      I don't know, the US military seems to get away with it.

    150. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do they also have merit badges for not thinking independently?"

      Yes, actually.

    151. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      He didn't violate the Constitution, as those people were not citizens.

      Now, I feel that they should get a fair trial, but that is not guaranteed by the Constitution.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    152. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Black+Art · · Score: 1

      As has already been pointed out, this is NOT a Merit badge, it is a patch.

      But if it is a patch to something that is proprietary, isn't that a violation of the license?

      --
      "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    153. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jafac · · Score: 1

      The "Moral Foundation" as used in Scouting is really a much broader-based term than the "Moral Foundation" as defined in fundamentalist religions.

      Homosexuality really is not a "Moral" issue in the context of a non-fundamentalist-religious worldview. Scouts is not a fundamentalist religious organization. In fact - the religion badge can be for hindus, muslims, buddhists, jews, etc. whatever.

      You can teach a boy a very strong and thorough set of moral values, without even touching on sexual orientation.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    154. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jafac · · Score: 0, Troll

      And that's why the Scout Leadership program has "Child Protection Training" - to ensure rules are followed like "two-deep leadership" to keep boys and leaders out of those kinds of situations. Whether you're dealing with a straight or gay leader, or a pedophile leader (straight or gay).

      I agree that I don't want ANY pedophiles, of either sex or either orientation as leaders in scouts. But I have no problem with a gay leader, even of my own boy's Troop.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    155. Re:Scouts Honor.... by DocDendrite · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "I don't see any homophobia" Ohhh of course you don't - no bigot sees their own views as bigotted.

    156. Re:Scouts Honor.... by nolesrule · · Score: 1

      Based on TFA, I don't think this is a merit badge at all. Rather, it's just a patch that Boy Scouts can earn from the MPAA, kinda like you can get a patch for hiking through St. Augustine, FL and answering some questions.

      --
      -- nolesrule
    157. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously beleive he didn't consult his staff?

      This is kind of the defining flaw of the Bush Jr terms for me... the executive branch can't seem to select competent advisors. He managed to chase fricking Colin Powell off the cabinet, for Christ's sake.

      In the interest of full disclosure, my listed defining flaw of the clinton administration was an attempt to deal with escalating centralized international terrorism by ignoring it, and Bush Sr. was too mediocre to really have perceptible flaws or merits, except perhaps for 'read my lips, no new taxes' (/snicker). Much farther back, and I really didn't have opinions on politics.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    158. Re:Scouts Honor.... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      The political party that started it all was the Federalists circa 1800. The political party that started it on a large-scale level were the Whigs and (Jacksonian) Democrats of the 1830s. But the Lewinsky scandal was one of the biggest ones in the last decade or two, the Republicans were clearly the accusers there, and now the same thing is happening to them--specifically to a member of the House of Representatives who happened to have been there during the Lewinsky scandal.
      "It's vile," said Rep. Mark Foley, R-West Palm Beach. "It's more sad than anything else, to see someone with such potential throw it all down the drain because of a sexual addiction."
      Hence, karmic retribution.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    159. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They just ask that you hold a religious belief.

      As an atheist I don't see this as an acceptable requirement. It is discrimination.

      If necessary you could point out that atheism is a religious belief.

    160. Re:Scouts Honor.... by fithmo · · Score: 1
      Actually, more likely to be like the kids in "Jesus Camp". You get to people young enough- you define who they are and what they feel is right and wrong.

      Maybe the boys, but preacher's daughters are freeeeaaaakay!

    161. Re:Scouts Honor.... by scotch · · Score: 1
      There's a big difference between saying "no I did not have relations with this woman" while knowing you did, and saying "I swear to uphold the constitution",

      Yeah, wow, there is a differnece, one matters and the other doesn't. Seriously, upholding the constitution is presidential-job #1, and if he can't do it, acciedently or intentionally, he's unfit for office. Keeping your dick in your pants is presidential-job #403.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    162. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Alchemar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The boys scouts are "Jesus Camp":

      Can't be atheist http://www.komotv.com/news/story.asp?ID=21204

      But lets get their belief on their "Duty to God" strait from their legal department
      http://www.bsalegal.org/faqs-195.asp

      I am all for letting everyone practice whatever their beliefs, but I am for letting them practicing equally. I have a personal beef with the schools system for only allowing religious organizations that they personally find acceptable. The local school even states in their policy that the only uniforms allowed are for ROTC and Boy Scouts. I am a humanist, I believe in Peace and Getting support from other human being instead of waiting for divine intervention (on a personal note, I think I have made an involentary exception to that for the upcomming elections), why can't I have an organization advertised in the school by allowing the children to wear a uniform?

    163. Re:Scouts Honor.... by ampmouse · · Score: 5, Funny
      Demonstrate your knowledge of the following:
      a. What is a copyright?
      Copyright is a set of exclusive rights regulating the use of a particular expression of an idea or information.
      b. Why do copyrights matter?
      To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;
      c. Identify five types of copyrighted works (two may be your own). For each, give the author/creator and the date the work was copyrighted.
      1. GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE - Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
      2. libdvdcss - Copyright (C) 1999-2003 VideoLAN
      3. dvdbackup - Copyright (C) 2002 Olaf Beck
      4. Linux - Copyright (c) 1991 Linus Torvalds
      5. FreeBSD - Copyright (C) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
      d. Name three ways copyrighted materials may be stolen.
      1. Go to the location where the copyrighted materials are stored, create a diversion, and run off with the copyrighted materials when no one is looking.
      2. Go to the owner of the copyrighted materials, make statments that might suggest his or her life is in danger if you do not have the copyrighted materals, then run off once the person gives them to you.
      3. Run in to the location where the copyrighted materials are used, screeming, and waving a bag over your head. Then, grab the copyrighted material and speed off in your car.
      Visit a video sharing network or peer to peer website and identify which materials are copyrighted and which aren't.
      I visited Jamendo. All the material is copyrighted.
      Ok, I am done. Now give me my Badge!
    164. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has already been pointed out...

      Please don't confuse the slashtards with the truth.

    165. Re:Scouts Honor.... by scotch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      People who say Bush "lied" have no concept about what it means. Clinton LIED under oath. That is what got him in trouble with most people and not Lewinsky.

      No, actually what got Clinton in trouble was having a Congress held by a Repulbican majority. Bush has the luxury of not having to answer to congress; His congress seems to be filled with people intent on abdicating their constitutional powers and allowing the Executive any expansion of power it wishes. Partisan politics and a Republican hat-trick on the hill ensures there will be no accountability in Washington except for the most comically outrageous offenses.

      Keep drinking the koolaid, ac

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    166. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to also realise that with Boy Scout's the whole is pretty much as only as not only it's member's but it's leaders. I'm currently the Cub Master for our local Pack (Greater Pittsburgh Council) and a lot of the values tought are up to the leaders and the charter orgs to a lesser extent (even though the council tries to push you one way or another it's still your program). If your leader teaches tolerance towards certain types of people then that is what your kids are going to learn. Like wise if you teach non-tolerance that is what they'll learn.

      As far as the badge goes, I don't think that it's going to make much of an impact as it's usually the hands on stuff that the kids look to do rather then the tour and report badges. There are a ton of these badges out there that very few kids do jsut because they are rather boring to do.

    167. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Yeah, wow, there is a differnece, one matters and the other doesn't. Seriously, upholding the constitution is presidential-job #1, and if he can't do it, acciedently or intentionally, he's unfit for office. Keeping your dick in your pants is presidential-job #403.

      Actually, not lying to a grand jury has to be pretty high up there, much higher than #403. Keeping your dick in your pants doesn't register on my list. For a president, lying.. not merely telling an untruth, but lying to the American people deserves an extremely harsh penalty. I wouldn't go as far as saying Clinton should have been kicked from office though. Bush, on the other hand..

      Yeah. I can't wait for legal proceedings against him. As long as his party stacks Congress, though, don't count on anything substantial.

    168. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but I'd imagine lawyers would advise you to *not* get the badge---If you're ever taken to court for piracy, they could produce proof that you knew it was illegal. I know ignorance is no defense, but having to acknowledge you knew is shooting yourself in the foot.

    169. Re:Scouts Honor.... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Bush has the luxury of not having to answer to congress"

      Seventeen days from today, that status quo stands a very likely chance of turning on him pi radians.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    170. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 3, Funny

      I see you're a fan of my sig.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    171. Re:Scouts Honor.... by MMMDI · · Score: 1

      Constitution? pfffft. It's "just a goddamned piece of paper", after all.

    172. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      But I have no problem with a gay leader, even of my own boy's Troop.

      I don't honestly have any problem with it either, but I can understand the organization's position.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    173. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Saint+V+Flux · · Score: 0
      "Once upon a time, scouting was about kids discovering themselves."

      Yes, nothing like group conformity to help someone be an individual!

    174. Re:Scouts Honor.... by kzt · · Score: 1

      Please read the article people - it says Los Angeles area scouts. This is not an official merit badge, and I doubt that it ever will be.

      As for all the talk about Scout camps pushing religion, I cannot speak about other councils, but mine did not push it hard. Yes, religion is a part of the Scouting organization - it always has and always will be. However, I wouldn't call it brain washing, unless a non-denominational grace before meals during one week of camp is considered brain washing. That's pretty much all the religion pushed onto us.

      And yes, I am an Eagle Scout.

    175. Re:Scouts Honor.... by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

      IIRC The oath of office is taken with the hand on the bible

    176. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      Ya, when I was in the Scouts a decade or two ago, my mom and dad ran my den and all our little individual meetings were great. However, the larger pack meetings were pretty awful. Lots of boring ceremony, some canned activities, and a lot of people living vicariously through their kids. The bureaucracy was awful and every event was terribly inefficient -- I realized this even at eight. Eventually my parents quit because they were fed up dealing with the bureaucracy and some terrible kids in the den whose parents were using the scouts as a daycare service.

      Of course I didn't appreciate this all at the time, but it's become clearer in retrospect :P

    177. Re:Scouts Honor.... by OzoneLad · · Score: 1

      "Be honest. He got at least one.... but he figured he couldn't be bothered to get the rest."

      Maybe he figured he just needed to get the one warrant before wiretaping everyone.

      -HT

    178. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      It speaks very much to his competence as a president. The scandal completely undermined his relationship with Congress and left him essentially ineffective during the last half of his second term in promoting any kind of agenda.

      What do you mean it undermined his relationship with Congress? At the time of the scandal, the Congress was controlled by a Republican Party hell-bent on getting Clinton removed from office. They very much saw him as an adversary to be removed and looked high and low for things to throw at him.

      I find the whole Lying Under Oath thing to be despicable in itself, but if he had such a great relationship with Congress in the first place, it would never have reached that point. That's what saves our currently-seated president.

    179. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      What about agnosticism? How would atheism somehow be more acceptible?

    180. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      you know, what it really comes down to is the fact that the Boy Scouts is a private organization that stands for certain things. If it seems that one of those things is that homosexuality is wrong, so be it. You don't have to like it. But you don't have the right to criticize those who choose to participate in the Boy Scouts.

      Oh, actually, he does. Given to him by the very same right that allows Boy Scouts to gather as a private organization and exclude whomever they want.

    181. Re:Scouts Honor.... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      hammered away into anti-gay, christian centric whored out to any group that wants type of thing

      As an Eagle Scout, I'm incredibly offended by your comment. You couldn't actually be further from the truth. Boy Scouts is a little slow in changing, but that doesn't mean that it purposefully teaches exclusion and hate.

    182. Re:Scouts Honor.... by mjtaylor24601 · · Score: 1

      "few people would raise an eyebrow at a heterosexual male coaching a high school girl's basketball team"

      Yes, but take that same heterosexual male coach and have him take that same girls basketball team on a camping trip...alone in the woods...away from all other supervision...in close quarters with little privacy...and you just might see a few eyebrows raised.

      Not that I particularly agree with the prohibition against gay scout leaders (I'm inclined to think it's generally an overreaction) but I can at least understand the argument, and I don't think it necessarily implies a homophobic bent (although it's certainly possible to use such an argument to cover homophobic tendencies).

      --
      I wish I were as sure of anything as some people are of everything
    183. Re:Scouts Honor.... by mcmaddog · · Score: 1

      And of course one is about lying about sexual relations with a woman and the other is about destroying a fundamental structure of our government.

    184. Re:Scouts Honor.... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Only if voter fraud doesn't save the Republicans' heinies.

    185. Re:Scouts Honor.... by a.d.trick · · Score: 1
      Call it destiny, a sense of purpose, or being a sociopath.

      I think it's a rather fundamental part of being human: questioning our pre-suppositions and such.

    186. Re:Scouts Honor.... by alnjmshntr · · Score: 1

      Doesn't stop people from trying to use Scouting to score political points, but we try to ignore those people.

      Yet according to you, the BS organistation is homophobic (homosexuality doesn't imply pedophilia) and anti-atheism/agnostic (even if the rule isn't enforced, it's in the books, why is that?).

      So you are affirming exactly the same wrongs that "those people" claim.

      --
      If I had created the world I wouldn't have messed about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers
    187. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they also have merit badges for not thinking independently? Or one for having your IQ reduced to a single digit and being converted to a near-mindless automaton?

      Are you kidding? That's been the cornerstone of the BSA for a number of years now....

    188. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unless, ofcourse, you can show that Bush deliberately set out to violate the Constitution.


      To be honest I think he's too stupid to engineer that on his own. I'd be curious to pick apart some CIA and NSA analyst who were accosted by Cheney to see how much of the Iraq material was contrived by them under duress. And don't even get me started with Bush's refusal to answer the nose candy question.

      Look, spin it anyway you want, but Clinton was ten times the president Bush is. The best thing about the upcoming elections are that the Republicans are about to get their asses handed to them. (Thank you Mr Foley! *snicker*) At one time I was a center-right Republican but shit is out of control, and the pro-big business and evangelical types can go fuck themselves. Being involved in the local political scene I know centrist Republicans who are scared shitless of the future because of all the negative PR Bush and Co have generated, and on more than one occasion I've heard Republican arrogance described with words such as "breathtaking" by other Republicans.

      It always cracks me up, you Bush apologists. One ropy jet of jism on Monica's dress does not equal a half trillion dollar war with a couple of thousand US troops killed, not to mention the situation for the people of Iraq. Don't even get me started on warrantless wiretaps and social security. What a disaster.
    189. Re:Scouts Honor.... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      I sniggered when I read "peer to peer website".

      Peer to Peer websites dont exactly exist.

    190. Re:Scouts Honor.... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Yeah its depressing how only a very small minority of people think for themselves.

    191. Re:Scouts Honor.... by noidentity · · Score: 1
      Visit a video sharing network or peer to peer website and identify which materials are copyrighted and which aren't.

      I visited Jamendo. All the material is copyrighted.

      Sounds like a trick question. What video material isn't copyrighted? As far as I know there's no way to revoke copyright, and anything you make is automatically copyrighted.

    192. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure public domain works are not copyrighted.

    193. Re:Scouts Honor.... by hcob$ · · Score: 1
      Do they also have merit badges for not thinking independently? Or one for having your IQ reduced to a single digit and being converted to a near-mindless automaton?
      Honestly, if you've ever tried to complete an Eagle Scout rating in the Boy Scouts (and had a proper Scout Master), you'd shelve that comment for being horribly inaccurate.

      By the time you actually finish an Eagle Scout, you're an extremely resourceful and independent individual. With the ability to adapt, plan, and sucessfully complete many tasks that most non-boy-scout "you're all a bunch of automatons" people could never do.

      First Aid, Camping, Archery, Fishing, Cooking, Orientateering, Leadership, Sense of Purpose, Moral Compass... Yeah, thesee are all indications of automatons. Next time you want to degrade an institution that actually encourages self reliance and critical thinking, think about what you can ACTUALLY do when there's no one to help you.
      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    194. Re:Scouts Honor.... by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. But was Bush under oath when he took the oath of office? I assume that chirping, crickety sound is you realizing that Bush has never lied under oath. Ladies and gentlemen, the defense rests. when you take the OATH of office, of course you're under OATH.

    195. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      the BS organistation is homophobic

      Not what I said. I just said they think it's unwise to have homosexuals as leaders for young men. I also think it's unwise to have women taking groups of boys on camping trips. Not that it's likely to be a problem -- but over hundreds of thousands of cases, it will be a problem eventually. And please take note: How many lawsuits have been filed against the BSA for sexual abuse of the boys? A bare handful. An amazingly small number, given the number of scouts and leaders. Don't mess with what works.

      homosexuality doesn't imply pedophilia

      Didn't say it did. If it did, I wouldn't have had to list both, now would I? I mentioned both because they're separate and distinct.

      anti-atheism/agnostic

      Yes, it is.

      So you are affirming exactly the same wrongs that "those people" claim.

      I didn't say their claims were inaccurate -- just overhyped and overblown. What I SAID (geez I wish people would learn to read!) was that those issues don't define scouting, and scouting organizations don't spend a lot of time focusing on them. Those issues are parts of scouting that other people choose to define scouting, because they want to score political points.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    196. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Bobjects · · Score: 1

      If necessary you could point out that atheism is a religious belief.

      Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    197. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "Your attempt to paint me as a dishonorable individual because I'm willing to lie in situations in which I shouldn't be asked a question at all is ridiculous, because I am not a sheep. I make my own decisions and I don't need the court to tell me about right or wrong."

      You miss the point entirely. Courts have nothing to do with it. Lying is wrong. Period, full stop. If you can make yourself feel better by justifying your lies, hey, that's your decision. I'm sure child molesters make themselves feel better by telling themselves that the kid enjoyed it. You're more than welcome to perceive the world however you wish. I just avoid having to compromise my morals by not lying at all.

      "Obeying an unjust law is not the right thing, it is the wrong thing."

      Who said otherwise? I never said I obeyed every law, in fact if you'll recall I specifically stated I'd gotten caught breaking the law before. Nobody says you have to obey them, but it's pure cowardice to lie about it afterwards. At least be a man and stand up for what you believe in. If you think a law is unjust, step forward and claim responsibility. Say that the law is unjust. If enough people did that, the law would get overturned. It's people like you, who lie and weasel their way through the system, that allow those laws to stand.

      "I think what you're missing is a willingness to grasp reality and manipulate it, instead you are ruled by it."

      I grasp reality just fine, I simply refuse to let it change my character.

      "I think what is needed here is an agreement to disagree."

      Sure.

    198. Re:Scouts Honor.... by caffeine_high · · Score: 1

      In my experience most atheists do not see atheism as a religion. It is a lack of a belief in the existence of gods.

      It really depends on your definition of religion, if it involves the belief in the supernatural than atheism is out, if it is more general well everything is in.

      --
      The smarter home exchange, http://switchhomes.net
    199. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "That's pretty irrelevant, we've been creating terrorist so long that you might say it's one of the things we're best at."

      I suppose that's true, in the same way that a woman in a short skirt creates rapists.

    200. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "Indeed, it could be argued that sometimes fighting the law at the time is upholding the same concepts. There's certainly a lot of historical precedent, even in the sanitized versions of American history ;-)"

      I never claimed otherwise, but how can you equate saying "no, I didn't break the law" with fighting the law? The best way to fight an unjust law is to break it, and let others see you break it. Ofcourse, it helps if you're not doing it by yourself, but the concept is still valid. You don't fight unjust laws by lying.

    201. Re:Scouts Honor.... by noidentity · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had thought that one couldn't really put something in the public domain nowadays, just grant a license that allows anyone to use the work. Apparently U.S. Government works are in the public domain, and maybe other works made after 1923 as well: Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States

    202. Re:Scouts Honor.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        How do you fight them, then?

        SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    203. Re:Scouts Honor.... by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Phewww!!!LOL!!
      I just spewed my beer all over my monitor, you insensitive clod!

      "1. Go to the location where the copyrighted materials are stored, create a diversion, and run off with the copyrighted materials when no one is looking."...priceless!!!

      At least as a former Boy Scout, I know enough First Aid to wrap my sprained ribs! (from laughing too hard)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    204. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      Sure, but somehow, I have managed not to. Are you saying that if you, a straight man, found yourself in a group of 16 year-old girls, you'd be unable to keep your hands off them?

      I can't speak for GP, but if there was clear consent and I'd like the girl..

      Note: I am one of those people here from a place where the age of consent is indeed 16. I've also seen too much abuse and rape amongst adults and too many adolescents in a dedicated relationship to have any reason to believe adolescents are inherently less capable of making judgment calls. It would be nice if more people would focus on actual sex offenders and not jump into taboo-mode whenever there's a possibility of intimacy involving age differences or a certain orientation.

    205. Re:Scouts Honor.... by BASICman · · Score: 1

      That kind of reminds me of the types of people I've seen working at Scout camps during the summer. Generally, you get both the long haired, Birkenstock-clad crowd, and the bunch whose cars all sport "Abortion is a Sin" bumper stickers.

      And forget about the Scoutcraft people. Those guys are usually ready to light something on fire (often themselves).

      --
      An enlightenment painter would paint a grand house on a lawn; A romantic painter would paint it on fire.
    206. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 1

      Err, I do recall many female leaders in scouts.

      I do not, however, recall any instances of molestation.

      You're a biased idiot.

    207. Re:Scouts Honor.... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Because words like truth, honor, duty, and integrity actually have some meaning to me.

      SHEEP HAVE NO HONOR.

      Following the law in EVERY situation does not make you honorable, it makes you a sheep. If you cannot think for yourself, you are less than a man. Playing by somebody else's rules, even when you know they are dishonest is not in itself a noble act. Quite often it is a stupid waste.

      You are a criminal. You have broken some law at some point in time. It's basically impossible not to. Why didn't you turn yourself in? Doesn't your "honor" dictate that you must?


      George S. Patton: "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."

      Falling on your sword because the other side says you should is simply stupid.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    208. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, let's correct something here. Bill Clinton was subject to a lawsuit over SEXUAL HARRASSMENT. Any kind of sexual activity outside of his marriage is 100% fair game as it is both relevant and establishes a pattern. He previously claimed, under oath, that he did not have affairs. That makes him wide open to ALL investigation as to whether or not that is true. He lied under oath in order to deprive a US citizen of her day in court for doing something that was illegal. If you might recall, Clinton WAS disbarred for lying under oath. There is NO exception, period. Making exceptions makes a mockery of the law and the Constitution. This man was a lawyer and knew what he was doing. He deserved everything that happened to him regardless of the subject. Grow up and read the facts of the case.

    209. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How can they think independent if they don't know what the other side's position is?

      Even if the other side's "position" is a pack of self-serving lies to indoctrinate children that anything not supportive of a dinosaur business plan is not only misdemeanor copyright infringement, but felony theft? They'll hear enough bullshit in their lives without adding in this fetid crap.

      I would only expose the **AA "position" to kids as an example of what vile whores IP lawyers can be and what grasping bastards media companies are when they try to circumvent the Constitutional intent of copyright.

      I will then teach them the proper, elegant way to flip someone off so they don't look like dodos when they do so.

    210. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am a humanist


      thank god for that.
    211. Re:Scouts Honor.... by niiler · · Score: 3, Informative
      Since you mention it....

      I was an Eagle Scout, Senior Patrol Leader, Junior Assistant Scountmaster, and finally, an Assistant Scoutmaster. I was involved with the scouting movement from the time I was seven years old until I was out of college. I would not ever want my child involved with the parsimonious, right wing ideologs that make up scoutings core today This is for several reasons. Units I have seen recently have become increasingly intolerant of difference rather than celebrating it, they have become cheerleaders for the far-right and ultra-nationalism, and they have become decreasingly involved in the outdoors. Much of the adult leadership I have seen is anti-gay, ant-flag burning, pro-marriage amendment, pro-bible-banging, out-of-shape and generally-not-the-sorts-of-people-I-want-my-son-to -learn-from. This anti-piracy merit badge is just in line with the thinking I've seen from Scout leaders.

      Finally, with the increase in liability over the years, there are more and more limits to the activities troops get involved with. Fewer troops seem willing to take part in 50 mile afoot/afloat activities or go to places like Philmont Scout Ranch.

      As a personal parting shot, I find the BSA's exclusion of martial arts as an acceptable activity to be ridiculous. When I was in scouts, my peers could get the athletics merit badge by: "Tak(ing) part for one full season as a member of an organized team in ONE of the following sports: baseball, basketball, bowling, cross-country, diving, fencing, field hockey, football, golf, gymnastics, ice hockey, lacrosse, rugby, skating (ice or roller), soccer, softball, swimming, team handball, tennis, track and field, volleyball, water polo, or wrestling (or any other recognized team sport approved in advance by your counselor, except boxing and karate)." The BSA cites safety reasons, however for karate and Chinese martial arts, the medical literature indicates that they are safer in incidence and severity of injuries than the majority of activities listed. See Birrer's article on the results of an 18 year survey. We can get into a detailed discussion of medical injuries in the martial arts later, but I find it ironic that scouting bans martial activities even though it is descended from using children as messengers on the battlefield in the 2nd Boer War.

    212. Re:Scouts Honor.... by logophage · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, it isn't the RIAA who gets royalties for a performance. The RIAA controls "original recordings" and not compositions (i.e. the song itself). Instead, you get license from ASCAP, BMI, SESAC in order to publically perform a song.

    213. Re:Scouts Honor.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      There's a big difference between saying "no I did not have relations with this woman" while knowing you did, and saying "I swear to uphold the constitution", and then doing something which in your opinion doesn't violate the constitution and then having someone else determine that it does

      Yeah. The big difference is that the first is a question a president should never have been asked (except by his wife). The second goes to the heart of his duty to the nation.

    214. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Cow+Jones · · Score: 1
      Adolph Schicklgruber grew up as a Jew
      Assuming you're referring to Adolf Hitler:
      - he did not grow up as a Jew
      - there is no proof of any Jewish ancestors at all
      - he was never called Schicklgruber
      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    215. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      Mossauiai (however you spell that) and Hamdi certainly are US citizens.

    216. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      I think it's readily apparent that he didn't set out specifically to violate the Constitution, but he doesn't have any problem at all overstepping his boundaries of his power.

      What part of 'no warrantless wiretapes, searches, or seizures' are you having problems understanding? The FISA courts allowed him to take his time getting the warrants (72 hours) after the fact. He didn't want to be bothered with that. He got the law changed.

      It is illegal and uncostitutional for the president to declare war on somebody. That's the job of Congress. Somebody passed a law allowing him limited military action for up to 90 days. He took advantage of that, then declared 'Mission accomplished' before the 90 days of active hostilities were up. IANAL, but I'm thinking the 90 days should have started when he first contemplated military action, not when the first shots were fired. But then, according to recent legislation, I can be declared an enemy of the state for what I'm writing in this comment.

      See you in Gitmo.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    217. Re:Scouts Honor.... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Your point? Pedophiles are also excluded from being leaders. As are felons.

      So, why the need to exclude gay leaders?

      Boy scouts are young men, not children.

      What's your point? That young men shouldn't be around older men or women?

      In some circumstances. Scouting is one of them.

      Why? Give me a good reason for this. If these people are young men, then wouldn't it be doing a disservice by shielding them from the real world, just before they gain majority legal status? Shouldn't leaders and their charges be taking responsibility for their actions, rather than blaming things on sexual orientation?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    218. Re:Scouts Honor.... by amcox · · Score: 1

      Ahh, North Lake to South Lake loop, perhaps? We did that hike as our Sierra Trek in 2000, crossing both Muir and Bishop passes. Went through Dusy Basiin and Evolution Valley, too, all without the bullshit that the religious nuts have tried to turn scouts into. Even with all the bad stuff, if you can find the right troop, Boy Scouts is still an incredibly fun and vialable experience. It's a shame that our daughters won't be able to do it as well. Blame the Mormons for that one as well. The United States is one of two countries in the world without co-ed scouting.

    219. Re:Scouts Honor.... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Why the hostile attitude? Seems to me we are pretty much in agreement. I have no trouble at all understanding that Bush has repeatedly violated his oath of office whenever it's convenient for him.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    220. Re:Scouts Honor.... by grimJester · · Score: 1

      Name three ways copyrighted materials may be stolen.

      It's odd that this is included. Copyright violation is NOT theft, as we all know. Will kids who know this have to lie on the test to get their badge?

    221. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      Atheism is not a lack of a belief, it is a belief in the lack of. It is a positive belief that there are no gods or other supernatural beings.

      I agree that most atheists don't see atheism as a religion, but they're wrong. Religion is a set of religious beliefs or practices. Everybody has religious beliefs of one sort or another, possibly except for the truly agnostic. It doesn't require belief *in* the supernatural, it requires belief *about* the supernatural, and believing that there is no supernatural is such a belief.

      Not that I expect the Boy Scouts to necessarily agree.

    222. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      What about agnosticism? How would atheism somehow be more acceptible?

      Atheism is a positive belief in the lack of a supernatural. Agnosticism says "I don't know." Atheism takes a stand and says "This is what I believe." That makes it easier to call it a set of religious beliefs. I don't know if "I don't know" counts as a belief or not, but "this is how things are" definitely counts as a belief.

    223. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      If necessary you could point out that atheism is a religious belief.

      Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

      Not collecting stamps is more like agnosticism. Atheism is like only collecting a certain kind of stamp.

    224. Re:Scouts Honor.... by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 1

      Apparently so. The idea that they would have one side of the dispute, in a disputed area of the law, dictate to impressionable kids what the law is, is astonishing, and certainly would count as a lesson in mindlessness and a textbook case of teaching them "not thinking independently".

      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    225. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... one is about lying about sexual relations with a woman and the other is about destroying a fundamental structure of our government.

      Yeah. But the real problem is: Our current Republican leadership thinks that the former is a serious problem worth prosecuting. The latter is not just acceptable behavior; it's policy.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    226. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      [Bush] has encountered virtually no resistance or scrutiny from Congress, and has skillful deceptive tactictians who, in a very real, cynical, Machiavellian sense, have artfully deceived the entire world, America included, into turning over as much power as possible to them and their cronies.

      I don't believe they have been deceptive at all. From well before Bush was elected governor of Texas, his behavior and policies have been quite thoroughly documented and the story has been available for anyone to read who has the slightest interest in the subject. And if you look at the public information before the invasion of Iraq, you'll find that all of the Bush gangs claims had been thoroughly and very publicly shown false. They were reduced to arguing that they had to invade because of what Saddam might do in the future.

      The problem is that about half the American voting population approves of Bush's policies and actions. This isn't from ignorance. We've all been told repeatedly and in great detail of his gang's lies and corruption. Anyone voting for him should be assumed to know about it. Their support implies that they approve.

      In particular, many people have explained in great detail why Bush's war in Iraq is highly illegal under both international and American law. He and most of his Cabinet could easily be impleached and thrown in jail for the rest of their lives. This isn't going to happen. The reason is that most of the Senate (including most of the Democrats) know and approve of it all.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    227. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Ooh, I know. I might have an idea. They were used in the Iran-Iraq war that the US was quietly (and not-so-quietly) encouraging! Do I get my merit badge, too?

    228. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Wait, wah? You mean your congressmen/senators don't take oaths of office? Odd.

    229. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Brilliant quote I read re Starr's investigation of him. "They told him to investigate Clinton, to dig up some dirt. They gave him $40M to do it. For forty million dollars, I'll give you dirt on the Pope and the Dalai Lama."

    230. Re:Scouts Honor.... by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      You sound just as stupid as the "Jesus Camp" people.

    231. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Any kind of sexual activity outside of his marriage is 100% fair game as it is both relevant and establishes a pattern. He previously claimed, under oath, that he did not have affairs.

      Whilst not dishonesty to your partner, what kind of fucked up fundamentalist, God fearing world do you live in where "having an affair" == "sexual harassment"?

    232. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "Following the law in EVERY situation does not make you honorable, it makes you a sheep."

      You know, learning to read and not put words in other peoples mouths...well it wouldn't turn you into a sheep or anything.

      Just so you know....

      If it makes you feel any better though, you're far from being the only person on slashdot that needs to improve in that respect. Just look around this thread and you'll see at least 4 more.

    233. Re:Scouts Honor.... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      There's a big difference between saying "no I did not have relations with this woman" while knowing you did, and saying "I swear to uphold the constitution", and then doing something which in your opinion doesn't violate the constitution and then having someone else determine that it does. One is intentional, the other accidental. One is a deliberate lie, the other is an accidental failure to keep a promise.

      One is harmless, the other endangers the privacy of the entire country.

    234. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Start by reading the whole post next time, instead of just the last line.

    235. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Err, I do recall many female leaders in scouts.

      Cub Scouts, yes, but in Boy Scouts I only see women working in the administrative roles around and above the troop leaders.

      You're a biased idiot.

      You leap to unsupported conclusions.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    236. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "A very reputable pollster recently showed with (according to him) 95% certainty that up to 650,000 Iraqi civilians have died since the war began, far exceeding the "official" body count. "

      Yeah. Right. I was thinking that you sound like a very reasonable individual until I hit that little tidbit. You do realize, don't you, that less German civilians died in all of the allied bombings of Germany during WW2? What are you trying to tell me, that carpet bombing saves lives?

      Those numbers are nonsense. For them to be true, more than 7,000 Iraqis would have had to die every single month from the beginning of the invasion. But even more amazingly, the last time these clowns did a poll was a year ago, and at that time the "body count", done by the SAME PEOPLE, only stood at 150,000. And I thought THAT was too high. But let's say it was accurate. That means in roughly 12 months, another 500,000 died. That gives you a death rate of more than 41,000 Iraqis per month! Can you imagine if that were actually happening? We wouldn't be seeing reports of "20 people killed in market bombing", we'd be seeing reports of "crowd of 10,000 gunned down in football stadium".

      Anything even remotely close to the figure being pushed is just ridiculous. The official count stands at just above 40,000, I'd be willing to accept a figure twice that size. Anything over 100,000 and you're starting to get into "I'm going to make up numbers because I hate Bush" land.

      "So I include myself among those people who believe that the real body count far exceeds the official one, which stands right now at 48,000 - a lower number indeed, but one that should still offend you."

      Ironically enough, if you interpolate the death rate under Saddam Hussein, and accept the 48,000 dead figure, you end up calculating that the Iraq war has actually SAVED between 80,000 and 100,000 Iraqi lives. Why? Because the violent death rate under Saddam Hussein was higher (averaged out over his time in office) than the current violent death rate.

      So, I really don't see why it should offend me. I don't expect the US military to save the life of every single Iraqi. That'd be a bit unreasonable, don't you think?

      Oh, and let's not forget the intelligence aspect. You're right there was certainly evidence to suggest that Saddam had ended his programs, however, that evidence was a lot more rare, and a lot less credible. When the overwhelming majority of evidence supports one idea, we tend to go with that. There's a reason why so many Democrats, and so many foreign leaders, are all on record as having stated that Saddam is a threat and that he does still have WMD. They were all wrong too, but nobody accuses THEM of lying.

    237. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Actually, the scouts are drifting far enough into a right wing religious organization in many areas of the country that they are starting to lose access to schools and free government facilities.

      The funny thing for me, is when I was a scout growing up the literature showed young boys of all faiths being scouts. Okay until you realize that some of those faiths said that the other faiths were false.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    238. Re:Scouts Honor.... by multiOSfreak · · Score: 1
      If you're so sure he has, why are you posting as an Anonymous Coward?

      Because since Bush just signed into law the abolishment of habeus corpus, any citizen can be detained for any length of time with no probable cause and no access to legal council and no way to demand that a court review the charges. People, citizens no less, can now -- in America -- just disappear.

      Oh shit! Forgot to post as AC...Hotel Guantanamo here I come.
    239. Re:Scouts Honor.... by portnoy · · Score: 1
      A very reputable pollster recently showed with (according to him) 95% certainty that up to 650,000 Iraqi civilians have died since the war began, far exceeding the "official" body count.
      So I include myself among those people who believe that the real body count far exceeds the official one, which stands right now at 48,000 - a lower number indeed, but one that should still offend you.


      Ugh. I can't believe I'm putting myself in the position of arguing for this bloodthirsty administration. But that number of 650,000 makes me think that they're counting vastly different things. I suspect that that number is actually counting the total number of people who've died in Iraq -- even from natural processes -- in the last four years.

      Think about it -- what was the death rate in pre-war Iraq? Data from the World Book shows it was around 6 per 1000 people in 2002. In a country with 29 million people, that works out to 174,000 a year. Multiply that by the three-and-a-half years of war, and you come up with 609,000. Add in the US casualty figures, and you're roughly at the same number that Zogby's coming up with.

      The casualty numbers out of Iraq are, as you point out, offensive. But let's not make it worse by clouding the statistics with non-war-related deaths.
    240. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      It's just a matter of minimizing risk. For the same reason that male coaches don't go in their girls' team's locker rooms, female scout leaders don't take boys on campouts, the BSA requires the presence of two leaders at all times, leaders have to be trained in various aspects of safety, etc., etc., etc.

      I'm sure the vast majority of gay men would take no undue advantages, just as the vast majority of straight women would not. But why take the risk? If a man is known to have a potential sexual interest in the boys, it's not a good idea to send him into the woods with them for a week. Of course, there will still be cases where the man's sexual interest isn't known, so it's not like this will prevent all sexual abuse -- but it will prevent some, and that makes it a good thing.

      It's a little stronger than that, actually. Most scout leaders are scout leaders because their sons are scouts. Any time a man without a son in the troop expresses a desire to become a leader, we have to wonder why. Being a scoutmaster is a great deal of work, and the effort generally goes unappreciated -- especially by the boys it serves. Yes, there are fun aspects to it, but even those are tempered by being responsible for young men who often do stupid things in dangerous situations. What typically motivates people to become leaders is the desire to help their own children. The motivations of a homosexual man without children who wants to be a scout leader are, therefore, highly suspect.

      In the case of a gay man with a scout-age son, I'd tend to see the issue a little differently. I'd also see it differently if the gay man was a person I knew, trusted and respected. If I had a good reason to believe that his motivations were right, then I'd be fine with him as a scout leader for my son.

      Unfortunately, the BSA has no way of getting to know the potential leaders and judging their motivations. Given that, it makes a great deal more sense to do what they do: perform background checks on all potential leaders and deny the applications of criminals, homosexuals and pedophiles. I hate having to list those together like that, because it appears I'm equating them, but I'm not. The three categories are separate (well, pedophiles generally fall into the "criminal" category, because the way someone becomes 'outed' as a pedophile is generally by being convicted of sexually abusing a child). The BSA also rejects applicants if someone in the community protests, for virtually any reason at all. Protests are anonymous.

      These exclusions cast too fine a net, I know. It's likely that the vast majority of applicants that are thereby excluded would make fine leaders. I have an uncle who is ineligible because he was convicted of a sex crime. I know him very well and have no doubt he'd make a fantastic scoutmaster. The anonymous protest also opens up an obvious way for someone to prevent a man from becoming a leader for no good reason at all -- facts are not checked, applicants are simply refused.

      In the interest of the safety of the boys, it's far better to simply exclude risky categories -- and then require two-deep leadership for the applicants that are accepted. Which is exactly what the BSA does.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    241. Re:Scouts Honor.... by drew · · Score: 1

      While I partially agree with you, it's not just "some councils" that have ass hats running them. Most of the major decision makers in American scouting are (and have been for some time) LDS (Mormons). The more level headed troops and councils seem to be an ever decreasing minority- or at least they were the last time I was actively involved in scouting, which was some years ago now. My troop, I think was in a lot of ways one of the better ones. While there was a slightly noticeable conservative bent due to the fact that were associated with a church, and a lot of the adults were church members, it wasn't opressive (partly due to a bit of a political falling out between the scout leader and some of the church officials), and we still spent most of our time focusing on the more traditional scouting skills, such as hiking, camping, conoeing, and shooting.

      Personally, I found my scouting experience to be immensely rewarding, but I am a little hesitant of whether I would ever want my kids to be involved in it. If it continues down the path it's been following, probably not.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    242. Re:Scouts Honor.... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Funny, you didn't actually point out where anything I said was wrong.
      Perhaps you simply can't defend your own arguments?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    243. Re:Scouts Honor.... by westlake · · Score: 1
      Adolph Schicklgruber grew up as a Jew

      Hitler was born Austrian and Catholic and raised in an environment that was deeply anti=semetic.

    244. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with strong and weak atheism, and with the fact that common usage of "agnostic" doesn't fit the historical origins of the word. I was using the following terminology:

      Atheism: what your second link calls Strong Atheism

      Agnosticism: what your first link calls Weak Atheism, often phrased as "I don't know". The common usage doesn't take a position on whether or not the existence of a god is knowable because most people who use it don't take such a position. In a sense, this definition of agnosticism is more agnostic than Weak Agnosticism or Strong Agnosticism because it says "I don't know" about more than one thing.

      To apply all this to the discussion, both Strong Agnosticism and Weak Agnosticism fit the definition of "religious belief" in the same way that atheism (what a philosopher would call Strong Atheism) does. So, if the Boy Scouts say "you must have religious belief," only an agnostic/Weak Atheist would be excluded. (I suspect that if an atheist used the arguments that I've used to argue for inclusion in the Boy Scouts, they'd be told "That doesn't count. What we mean is that you have to believe in The One True God to have religion.")

    245. Re:Scouts Honor.... by sokoban · · Score: 1

      Too bad, Gerry Studds was having consensual sex with someone rather than sending unwanted harrassing messages to people.

      Having sex with a coworker, wether it be gay, straight, or whatever is not a crime. Making unwanted advances in the manner of Mark Foley is a crime.

      This is the same problem that we were seeing in the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal and just about any sex scandal involving a public servant. People focus on the sexual side of the issue when that is the least poignant aspect of the situation. Clinton's problem wasn't that he had sex, but that he lied about it. Foley's problem wasn't that he had a relationship with one of his pages, but that he made repeated unwelcome advances toward them. Getting head in the Oval office or being a closeted gay are not crimes, Lying under oath and sexual harrassment are.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    246. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      You REALLY need to learn to read, bud. The first time you responded, you stated that "Following the law in EVERY situation does not make you honorable, it makes you a sheep", when, in fact, I'd never said anything about following the law in the first place. You misread my post entirely, and then made an entirely irrelevant statement.

      When I tried to point this out, you responded with "Funny, you didn't actually point out where anything I said was wrong", when, in fact, I'd never claimed you were wrong. I simply stated that you can't read. So, in fact, you basically proved my point :)

      In any event, it's a little disingenuous to argue against something I never said while pretending that I said it. Not cool, man. If you want to have a discussion, try responding to things I actually say, instead of things you wish I'd said.

    247. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Dread_ed · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right on man.

      For instance, have you ever gotten head from a catholic school girl?

      I don't know if the priests are teaching them or what but thye're DAMNED GOOD!

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    248. Re:Scouts Honor.... by IrishMASMS · · Score: 1

      Your observation is correct - but this was not always the case (from my experience). The fanatical push of religion happened in the 1990's. While I was a youth member in the Scouts in the 1980's, the Scout Troops I was with downplayed the religious overtones. I very much enjoyed the program & the opportunities; earned my Eagle in 1987.

      As I became more involved as an adult, working with the regional and national "leadership" I became less enthusiastic. More and more of those regional and national "leadership" were more & more fanatical on the religion and "flowing the rules"; but allowing themselves to get away with what they wanted. Almost like the "leadership" in Washington DC - so similar it is scary. Then I found the large Mormon influence into Scouting in the Midwest and at the national level; which made me so sick to my stomach.

      Frankly, at that point I realized it was not the same Scouting program I grew up on; and that I could no longer support the program (or rather, what the program has become). I boxed up all of my memorabilia - patches, uniforms, equipment, etc - and left the program; not turning back.

      Thankfully, while I was overseas I had the opportunity to see what the real scouting program is all about. Which I think had a bearing on seeing what the program here has degenerated into.

      So, a single council issues a badge Scouts can earn for Copyright? What a load of shit - but from my experiences does not surprise me in the least.

    249. Re:Scouts Honor.... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, this joke went over like a lead balloon. I was trying to point out the recursive nature of oath-taking. How do you know that a person taking an oath is telling the truth? Why, you have him take an oath promising to tell the truth beforehand. But how do you know he was telling the truth when he promised to tell the truth?

      Well, it's funny if you're living inside my brain.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    250. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's simply your opinion that sexual orientation is not a moral value. To some, including the BSA, it is very much a moral value. To me personally and religiously it is a moral value. Don't get your opinions mixed up with facts.

    251. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... and all the rest talked about the sex part.

      Never, ever, EVER forget that, out of all the principals in the Clinton impeachment thearter, only two ended it with an intact first marriage -- Bill Clinton and Orrin Hatch. The rest of the Republican sonofabitch "family values" liars were on their second or later wives.

      The despicable "Contract on America" bastard Newtie (that's what his momma calls him) Gingrich was so lacking in balls that he had to take divorce papers for his wife to sign in the hospital where she was recovering from cancer surgery. For that act alone, the abysmally cowardly piece of shit should be buttfucked daily for the rest of his life with a two-foot barbed wire dildo.

    252. Re:Scouts Honor.... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      I'd never said anything about following the law in the first place.

      Yes, you did. You were presented with the case where you had two choices:
      A) Follow the law and be punished for no good reason
      B) Break the law and avoid punishment

      These were the two choices availible in the situation under discussion. You chose A.

      When I tried to point this out

      And failed miserably since you never made any specfic allegations.

      For someone who says he never lies, you're certainly trying to squirm around a lot regarding what you did and did not say. You said you would never commit perjury. That makes you a sheep. An honorable man would be more than willing to do this an a variety of situations. A mans first obligation is to his fellow man, not his government.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    253. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "Yes, you did. You were presented with the case where you had two choices:
      A) Follow the law and be punished for no good reason
      B) Break the law and avoid punishment"

      You are VERY confused. Perhaps you should try re-reading the thread from the beginning. I was never presented with a case, nor was there ever any such stringent limitations on choices. Either you're hallucinating, or you read another thread and got it mixed up with this one.

    254. Re:Scouts Honor.... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      You said: I was never presented with a case

      "This is a case in which.."

      Yes, you were.

      You said: nor was there ever any such stringent limitations on choices

      "That is not an option when in front of a grand jury."

      You were presented with only two choices. Lie or don't lie. No other option.

      The thread is right there available for all to see. Perhaps it is you who should read the thread you are replying to?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    255. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meritbadge.com is way out of date. The computer merit badge requiremnets have been much improved in the last few years. I just love 5.D.

      I am a Life Scout.

    256. Re:Scouts Honor.... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see what you're going on about now. My mistake. You jumped in at the wrong spot, so it was rather confusing.

      Anyway, you're still misquoting and misunderstanding me. I never said that following the law is always the right thing to do. If you're going to keep insisting that I did, I'd ask that you provide a quote.

      In "the case" it just so happens that following the law happened to be the right thing. Why because braking the law required lying. And, as I've stated only about a dozen times so far in this debate, it's the LYING I disagree with. The law's got nothing to do with it.

    257. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A critical thinking should be able to make a forumalted decision ....

      And English is my [ ] first [ ] second [ ] third [X] next language.

    258. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't remember who said it but it went something like:

      "The man who does the right thing does it, not because he wants to change the world, but because he refuses to be changed by it."

      Well, I'm far better than you -- I can cite my sources:

      "A clever saying proves nothing."

      -- Rene Descartes

      Not to mention, your source obviously sees the world in the same binary, black-and-white manner as you do. Life and human nature are (though you can't believe it) immeasurably more complex than your kindergarten sandbox view.

    259. Re:Scouts Honor.... by HiThere · · Score: 1
      In some ways you are correct. He was not called Schicklgruber, since his father reportedly changed his name before the birth of his son. The reasons are unclear. I'm no historian.

      I can't prove anything about anyone's ancestors. My own included. I accept as probable that the was never religiously jewish. At that time and place whether or not you were a Jew was not solely defined by your religious practices.

      Certainly Wikipedia bears out many of your statements, but they contradict much of what I was taught in school. Either source is plausibly correct, so I will accept his status as disputed. (If you have a definite source, I might consider it more probable.)

      If you don't like his example, then let's pick King Olaf, or Emperor Julian. It's not like the examples are few...merely the famous ones. I know several people who (more or less) violently reject some part of what they were taught as a child. Usually if you don't know them well you don't get to know why they act the way they do.

      If someone isn't really famous, you generally don't find out much about how they were raised. (Frequently not then, hagiographers being the liars that they are.) This make it difficult to come up with commonly known examples. Perhaps you are right that I picked a poor one. (He was definitely a poor one for you, and you have convinced me that several things I though were facts are disputed.) This doesn't affect the basic argument.

      The thesis "Give me a child until he seven and he is mine for life." supposedly originated with Voltaire's Jesuit teacher. Sorry, right now I can only track down an indirect reference to this (in Pratchett's
      • Small Gods
      ). I first heard this, however, long ago in a high school class. At that point I had the name of the speaker (and I believe that the quote was slightly different).

      It's certain that such people make an impression, but it's often not the one they intend. I still remember
      "Pepsi-Cola hits the spot
        12 full ounces that's a lot
        Twice as much for a nickel too
        Pepsi-Cola is the drink for you"

      From when I was eight. Over the years since then this has, perhaps, caused me to buy ONE extra pepsi. I wanted to know what it tasted like. That is the only time I've intentionally purchased one.

      The ad made an impression...but perhaps not the one that was intended. I probably bought more cokes due to the rumor that some lady found a mouse in her Coke bottle, and was given a case of Coke to settle. But I've never heard Coke advertise that, and the rumor may well even have been false.

      Memorable doesn't mean acceptable or desirable. They are different concepts, nearly orthogonal.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    260. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 1

      Again, I can think of at least 6 female leaders who were deeply involved in the activities of different troops. That included meetings, camping and merit badge training. Small numbers compared to men, though no instances of female molestation.

      Hell, when I met my wife (we were both in Explorers) when teaching at the local boy scout camp when in high school. She taught canoeing.

      Not to mention that my explorer post (or, ship more appropriatly) had more adult females involved than adult males.

      Again, I'll call you a biased idiot.

    261. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Difference is, Clinton lied on numerous occasions.

      When Clinton lied, no one died. What's the score on BushBitch? Lessee -- nearly 3000 americans dead, well over 30,000 Americans wounded, likely far more than 500,000 Iraqui civilians dead (more anually than under Saddam, by the way), not to mention their wounded.

      If we get out of this for less than $500,000,000,000 (that's about $1000 per Iraqui civilian) It's estimated that it will cost another three times as much (that comes to 1.5 trillion additional), to provide lifelong care for all the walking wounded we bring home, including the 40% already, who are estimated to have PTSD at the minimum. Unless, that is, we decide to blow off all the tramautic brain injurise and other hard stuff as we did after Vietnam. Did you really know you were being lied into a $2 trillion total bill?

      Too bad the Catholic Church, when they made four new saints the other day, didn't make our commander-in-thief the patron saint of American butchers.

      As for Clinton's lies, do you really believe you've lived such a simon-pure life that, if an unauthorized blow job was in your background, you wouldn't have lied about it? What would you have done then if a crowd ganged up on you and kept asking until it got in front of a judge? You fucking goddamned hypocrite.

      "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged".
      -- Cardinal Richelieu (French Minister and Cardinal. 1585-1642)

    262. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Care to post references? I don't see any huge mormon influence in any of the councils or troops I have been involved with over the years. In fact, I have seen mostly UMC and Lutheran Churches and even some schools have scouting branches. In our Council, Simon Kenton, I have seen no evidence of any religion coming out at all. In fact, it's probably 70-80 percent secular.

      The Church of God near my house has a different form of scouting. I do not remember the exact name of the group, but there is a national presence with this group as well. They don't have a membership the size of the BSA, but they are there. This organization truly is evangelistic in their methods and they definitely are a Christian organization.

      Check out the troops when your son is of age and check out the true rules and leadership materials. They don't really focus on any religion. They ask that you profess a religion. They do refer to god in their laws but there's no real reference to the bible anywhere that I can find in my training materials that I have gotten thus far. The national organization is a fine one and they have made sound decisions in my opinion. The life experiences I have gotten in scouts were almost all entirely secular in nature and very valuable.

      --

      Gorkman

    263. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Either way, no matter how messed up the Boy Scouts are, they still have nothing on the Girl Scouts. Talk about an organization that doesn't know what it's doing. They're still not sure if they should be teaching girls how to cook, how to camp, or how to not speak unless spoken to. It doesn't help that girls interested in the more exciting parts of scouting can join the Boy Scouts via the Venture program.

      Quit living in the past, you simple-minded jerkoff. Thirty years ago my wife was a Brownie and Girl Scout leader who taught the girls far more than the contents of your ignorant list. We're still in contact with many of them and they've all turned out to be absolutely delightful, smart, independent women, most with families of their own.

      If you're not a pervert, get involved, at least as a driver to camping trips and other activities. You'll learn a lot if you're open to it.

    264. Re:Scouts Honor.... by rbook · · Score: 1

      The "Computers" merit badge requirements were updated in 2005. The new requirements are here. You were looking at the 1993 requirements -- which unfortunately was the last revision before 2005.

      The merit badge system is not really well-suited to rapidly-changing subjects. After all, kids working on advancement requirements have to know in advance what they have to do. It's not fair to them to change requirements frequently. Fortunately, most of the merit badges are in subjects that don't change all that rapidy -- camping, hiking, swimming, first aid, etc.

      Then again as Woodbadger pointed out about, this copyright thing is not actually a merit badge.

      And yes, as an Eagle Scout, I can confirm that Envinronmental Science is the "hardest" -- at least in that it requires the most writing.

    265. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the duties of scouting is to form a young man so that he/she has a critical discrimination capacity and could decide by him/herself cleverly, without being deceited.

      I hope soutmasters keep this as a priority duty and let the boy think about the existence of RIAA, but also FSF and creative commons and others: all this aimed at a general respect of the law. This is education, the rest is not.

      Nevertheless the scout law is _positive_ and an anti-piracy badge name has to be carefully thinked on: not anti-piracy, but pro-something....

      let's say a "authors' rights" badge including the right to not pay taxes or having legal costs for distributing free software like here in Italy.

    266. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Were those women mothers of the scouts? That changes the scenario a little. I mentioned in another post that I wouldn't be concerned about a gay man who wanted to be involved because he had a son in scouting. Any time any adult, man or woman, gay or straight, is interested in being a leader without having an obvious personal motivation, I think we have to wonder what their motives are. If the men are homosexual or pedophiles (note: two separate things), then the questions become even more important

      I don't actually have any opposition to gay men or straight women as scout leaders, as long as there's reason to think their motives are the right ones. In the absence of any way to evaluate those motives, though, the BSA's only safe option is to reject the applications.

      Also, it's worth noting that the BSA has no direct way to find out if an applicant is gay! They don't ask. The only way they find out is if someone in the community complains. And if there are complaints registered against a prospective leader for any of many reasons the application is denied. Unfortunately, that makes it possible to disqualify someone out of spite, or for any or no reason at all, but it's undeniably the safer approach.

      I would not be in the least surprised if there aren't openly gay leaders around who have the respect of their communities and therefore get no complaints. And I also wouldn't be surprised to find that if the issue was brought to the BSA that they would be fine with it. Some characterize this as "Don't ask, don't tell", but it's not, really. It's just being very cautious and acting aggressively on community concerns. In practice, it doesn't seem to be an issue, either.

      Bottom line: I think the BSA's position makes perfect sense. The goal is to protect the young men from abuse. It means that some who might be excellent leaders but fall into a category of higher risk are refused, but the goal of the BSA isn't to offer opportunities to adults who want to be leaders, it's to offer opportunity to boys who want to be scouts in a safe, fun environment.

      If you honestly disagree with this, what would *you* propose the BSA's policy be? And how would you minimize the risk of sexual abuse? The two-deep leadership policy is good, but a layered defense is much better. We absolutely don't want BSA scout leaders to get the reputation that Catholic priests have. Not that priests really deserve that reputation, but it only takes a handful of cases.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    267. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Interesting... these changes seem to have been influenced a bit by the copyright bastards industry of america. The old requirement of "explain if it is permissible to borrow a copy of a game from a friend" (or whatever) has been changed to "explain why it is not permissible".

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    268. Re:Scouts Honor.... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      He didn't violate the Constitution, as those people were not citizens.
      There is nothing in the Constitution that says people who are not citizens have no rights under the Constitution.
      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    269. Re:Scouts Honor.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      "That's pretty irrelevant, we've been creating terrorist so long that you might say it's one of the things we're best at."
      I suppose that's true, in the same way that a woman in a short skirt creates rapists.

      Denial is not a river in Egypt.

      First we go into a country and take a big shit on it and set up a puppet government.

      Then we give the lead puppet a bunch of advantages: We provide them with military equipment and training, and we tend to give them a lot of cash.

      Then we fuck them over and they get mad at us and bomb us.

      Then we do it all over again.

      This process, repeated many times, is basically the history of US military involvement, outside of a very small set of conflicts.

      We armed, trained, and funded Osama Bin Laden, and he's only the latest example.

      People like you who refuse to see the truth are the problem in this country. I bet you don't believe the CIA imported cocaine after they got caught repeatedly, either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    270. Re:Scouts Honor.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      At least be a man and stand up for what you believe in. If you think a law is unjust, step forward and claim responsibility. Say that the law is unjust. If enough people did that, the law would get overturned. It's people like you, who lie and weasel their way through the system, that allow those laws to stand.

      Yeah right, ask all the people who have been busted for federal marijuana laws and are now sitting in prison for a victimless crime how they feel about that. We don't change the laws, we just build more prisons.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    271. Re:Scouts Honor.... by jafac · · Score: 1

      To me personally and religiously it is a moral value. Don't get your opinions mixed up with facts.

      hm. Sounds like you've got an opinion too.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    272. Re:Scouts Honor.... by DocDendrite · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not a fan of your sig. Try again: bigot: "One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ." Shawn, that's you. You're a bigot. I'm describing you as a bigot because your ideas are so egregious and they actively hurt others when you voice them. Not all debate is constructive - and your viewpoint only adds to the unfounded prejudice in the world. If I was attacking you (and not your ideas), I would call you an idiot / douce-bag / cum dumpster. I didn't do anything remotely similar. Bigot.

    273. Re:Scouts Honor.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      You're a bigot. I'm describing you as a bigot because your ideas are so egregious and they actively hurt others when you voice them. Not all debate is constructive - and your viewpoint only adds to the unfounded prejudice in the world.

      You know very, very little of my viewpoint. You obviously haven't even read many of my posts in this thread. You jump angrily in without understanding, beginning with name-calling, not conversation, not an attempt to understand or elucdate ideas -- yes, I'd say you're a huge fan of my sig.

      If you'd like to respond without namecalling, I'll gladly discuss the issue. If you're interested, I'd suggest you read this post in which I more fully explain my reasoning as to why the BSA's approach is the right one. If you take issue with elements of my reasoning, respond to them. If you just want to call names, well, people like that (you?) are the reason for my sig.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  2. Great by Who235 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's another badge I wouldn't have gotten.

    Just like the "Don't Stab Hoboes" badge.

    1. Re:Great by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      I got that one. The only hard part was getting the bloodstains out.

    2. Re:Great by pluther · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see it now:

      No, mom, I'm not pirating movies, I'm... um... doing research for my MPAA merit badge! Yeah, it's for the Boy Scouts!

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    3. Re:Great by revery · · Score: 1

      There's another badge I wouldn't have gotten.
      Just like the "Don't Stab Hoboes" badge.


      Let me just say, Thank God for the "He had it coming to him" clause.

      --
      One-legged Joe, wherever you are on this fine night, I just wanted to say, I'm sorry.

    4. Re:Great by uncle-pepe · · Score: 1

      Why must people insist on pushing some faceless entitie's version of morality down these kids throat. What is next, you are gong to get a batch for not farting in elevators? Geez, where the hell is the common sence. ---- My sig is on strike

    5. Re:Great by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      What is next, you are gong to get a batch for not farting in elevators?

      Considering the BSA's homophobia, I am guessing the next badge will be for "Not holding it in your mouth until the swelling goes down".

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:Great by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      I didn't get that badge, and neither did my wife. It's one of her favorite things to do!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  3. I PLEDGE.... by joerdie · · Score: 4, Funny

    allegiance to the flag of the communist MPAA.

    1. Re:I PLEDGE.... by hsmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      ha! ha! i have no idea what communism is!!1

    2. Re:I PLEDGE.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 4, Informative

      Communist? Do you even have any idea what communism means? In a communist state, the MPAA wouldn't even be able to exist. The MPAA is about as capitalistic as it is possible to get.

    3. Re:I PLEDGE.... by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Copyright is while not necessarily communist is definitely not capitalist. It actually goes against the central tennants of capitalism and creates many of the conditions under which capitalism is known to fail. The parts of communism that it overlaps is, state granted monopoly, and planned economy, and enforcement of the planned economy via the state (read: FBI busts for copyright infringement). The "corporation" definitely exists in communist states, it merely takes its orders from the state rather than the consumer / shareholder.

    4. Re:I PLEDGE.... by lurker5 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You needed to grow up in the former USSR to get the joke. The communist party often spread its message through organized youth groups such as pioneers & rewarded those kids with various awards for their political activities.

    5. Re:I PLEDGE.... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      There is no such word as tennant. A tenant is someone who rents an apartment or building and lives there. The word I think you were looking for was "tenets", as in a principle being held as a truth.

    6. Re:I PLEDGE.... by O'Laochdha · · Score: 1

      The problem with your argument is that you imply that a given work of art can be considered an entire industry, a necessity for there to be a "monopoly" or a "planned economy." It doesn't work if you introduce the fiction of "intellectual property." Yes, it's a fiction, but property itself is a fiction, as are many other things - we agree to it because it works. Then you argue that intellectual property doesn't work. Well, then, all this "art" you're looking for - where would it be without intellectual property? These people get rich of the money they get from people who aren't as "enlightened" as you are, and that's why most of them work, even the ones who claim not to. Even those who work for the love of it wouldn't have nearly as much time to do so without those "communists'" money.

      So you see, it is a capitalist idea - you advocate taking it out of the hands of particular people (whom, by the way, the state does not select, a key anti-communist fact) and putting it in the hands of the community.

    7. Re:I PLEDGE.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Central authority setting prices and allocating resources? Check.

      Strong government-granted monopolies? Check.

      Creepy "youth programs" indoctrinating young people with the first two items? Check.

      "True capitalism" doesn't mean "you have a right to make money just cuz". Capitalism means: "you have the right to TRY and make money, and IF you succeed, you get to keep it." It doesn't mean your particular favorite business model is guaranteed to work via government force.

      There's nothing capitalistic about selling a $0.01 CD for $20 (UNLESS of course, people are willing to pay, which it seems they aren't).

    8. Re:I PLEDGE.... by *s.panzer* · · Score: 1

      Good thing he said nothing about copyrights being capitalistic, or else he would have just gotten owned.

    9. Re:I PLEDGE.... by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      Or you could have read 1984 and gotten a far creepier perspective. Children turning their parents in ..etc. Wonderful stuff.

    10. Re:I PLEDGE.... by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the same joke could have been made with the Hitler Youth. They were capitalists.

    11. Re:I PLEDGE.... by oliderid · · Score: 1

      IMHO

      Copyrights is private property. There isn't any form of private property in communism. Communism is collectivism. Private properties are forbidden.

    12. Re:I PLEDGE.... by impossiblefork · · Score: 1

      Communism may be collectivism, but collectivism is not communism; only the means of production are owned by the state.

    13. Re:I PLEDGE.... by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful
      IMHO
      Well, it's just as well your name isn't Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels, isn't it?

      (You really should read their books; they're much more interesting than you might believe, and you might even learn something! For example, that the various Open Source models - yes, even the ones that allow such attached "capitalist" trappings as Red Hat or MySQL - are much much closer to Marx & Engels' concepts than anything seen before.

      The "dictatorship of the proletariat", the bit that everyone seems to get stuck on and hung up over, is itself merely one (Marx thought inevitable; Engels wasn't so sure...) stepping stone on the path to Communism

      Read the books, and you might come away with the feeling that Linux itself is an expression of one of those stepping-stones...)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    14. Re:I PLEDGE.... by skywire · · Score: 1

      Under communism, the MPAA doesn't just use the state; it is the state.

      --
      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    15. Re:I PLEDGE.... by logophage · · Score: 1

      Q: What's the difference between communism and a monopoly?
      A: You don't get to vote for the monopoly.

    16. Re:I PLEDGE.... by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The way I see it, copyright is "communist" in that it's supposed to primarily be a mechanism to control corporate greed, i.e., "you have a temporary limited control over your (or your company's) intellectual property, but note that it's only limited and only temporary - you cannot hold complete and utter control over your creation, and your exclusive rights will expire one day, liberating it for all to use."

      Of course, the corporations don't exactly like this shiny outlook and are busy trying to erode whatever rights the consumer has and extending the terms toward perpetuity...

  4. I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    ... than the deal they got from the gay community.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by gstoddart · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      ... than the deal they got from the gay community.

      And what deal would that be? Mayhaps comparable to the one the alter boys have gotten from the Catholic community?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I once heard a gay activist emphatically state that almost all child molesters were heterosexual, including the ones that molested boys. He was trying to battle the stereotype that gay=molester, but come on - this is the same community that goes around telling everyone that lots of gays are closeted or in denial, and that even if they have sex with women they are still gay. But have sex with a boy - that's an abberation, and that person is Totally heterosexual.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Ueltzheimers · · Score: 1

      They are professionals at getting people to bend over...

    4. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I once heard a gay activist emphatically state that almost all child molesters were heterosexual

      I don't have any statistics one way or the other on that. Certainly, I often hear that these people are married and have children. Who is gay or not is up to them. If some people have an agenda whereby they want to define as many people as possible (or as few) as gay, that's their problem.

      My point is, this is not something which is representative of the community any more than the actions of a few priests are representative or Catholics, or the actions of Foley are representative of congress, or that blacks are more likely to commit crimes, or that Hispanics are probably illegal immigrants who are in gangs, or that all Muslims are terrorists, or that all Americans are gun toting fundamentalist rednecks. None of the preceding are fair generalizations to any of those communities.

      You can't go about painting an entire group of people with the same brush. But, this is slashdot, where it's more expedient to do so.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      I once saw a preacher kick a dog.

      Is this what passes for critical thinking in your community?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps you missed my argument- my criticism was that, in his desire to combat the stereotype taht all gays are potential child molesters, the activist made an equally outrageous claim that homosexuals are almost NEVER child molesters. He seemed to be implying that a man who is sexually attracted to other men is somehow immune to being attracted to boys.

      You can't fight stereotypes with equally outrageous claims to the contrary - it just makes the arguer look stupid and diminishes his real, legitimate point.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    7. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 0, Troll
      I once heard a gay activist emphatically state that almost all child molesters were heterosexual, including the ones that molested boys. He was trying to battle the stereotype that gay=molester,


      Attraction isn't a binary state, or trinary, or even discrete. The argument is more muddled by taking "child molester" as a single type. If you took a sample of heterosexual men, and showed them an array of women of varying age, there would be some (a lot) who would be attracted, even more attracted to those women who were post-pubescent, but not of legal age. Men busted with jailbait type adolescent girls don't have abnormal sexual attraction, they have problem with impulse control. You could say the same thing about the congressmen. There's nothing especially wrong in the attraction of a homosexual man to a 16 year old, but acting on it is.

      Attraction to pre-pubescents is a whole nother bag of worms. That imho is a problem with attraction AND impulse control.
      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    8. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I once heard a gay activist emphatically state that almost all child molesters were heterosexual,

      And almost all nobel prize laureates.
      The whole "huge majority of people being heterosexual" thing might, MIGHT have something to do with that.

      including the ones that molested boys.

      Did he say if they molested them in closets?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Ironically, American public school teachers have more child molesters per capita than American Catholic priests. If the former isn't a serious problem that has us all up in arms questioning the value and trustworthiness of the institution, I don't see why the latter should be.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    10. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      My point is, this is not something which is representative of the community any more than the actions of a few priests are representative or Catholics, or the actions of Foley are representative of congress, or that blacks are more likely to commit crimes, or that Hispanics are probably illegal immigrants who are in gangs, or that all Muslims are terrorists, or that all Americans are gun toting fundamentalist rednecks. None of the preceding are fair generalizations to any of those communities.

      However, many of those allegations are fair to the leaders of their respective communities. The Catholic Church has covered up the actions of a few priests (all the way to the top - they swear an oath to protect the church, above an oath to protect children), the Republican leadership may have covered up the actions of Foley, and certainly leaders of several Islamic countries have said such things as "death to Israel! kill $PERSON_X!", and many of our own politicians have encouraged the gun-toting fundamentalist redneck in all of us so we will be easy to control.

    11. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by kalidasa · · Score: 1, Troll

      Well, there's a semantic problem there. A perosn who is "gay" is someone who is attracted to *adults* of the same sex; a heterosexual is someone who is attracted to *adults* of the opposite sex. A child molester is a pederast, most are males who prey on girls, some are males who prey on boys, some are males who prey on either boys or girls, a few are females who prey on boys, girls, both, or get off by watching male pederasts. You can be both gay and a pederast, and you can be both heterosexual and a pederast; and oddly enough, you can even be both a heterosexual male and a pederast who preys partially or mostly on boys, is attracted to adult females, but no interest in adult males. This last is a lot more common than you'd think; there are probably as many or more of them than there are gay pederasts, simply because there are a lot more heterosexuals. Homosexuality is defined as not (psychologically) dysfunctional; but pederasty is very clearly dysfunctional.

    12. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By your logic, you are attracted to little girls.

    13. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or that blacks are more likely to commit crimes, or that Hispanics are probably illegal immigrants who are in gangs, or that all Muslims are terrorists, or that all Americans are gun toting fundamentalist rednecks.

      I'm not sure I follow here.

      Black people are more likely to commit crimes. After all, nearly 30% of black men in the US will be incarcerated at some point in their lives.

      Hispanics are definitely more likely to be illegal immigrants (and in gangs) than any other ethnic group.

      Muslims are more likely to be terrorists: after all, when was the last time you heard of a terrorist or especially suicide bomber who wasn't a Muslim (excepting the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, but they never bother anyone outside of that little island)?

      Americans are more likely to have guns than most other people (except the Swiss and the Canadians), and are more likely to be fundie rednecks.

      Sure, they're generalizations, but they are based in truth. Why ignore the truth? If you're walking in a dark parking lot to your car, and a gang of Hispanic men approaches you, should you be more cautious than if it were a gang of white-haired old ladies? Of course you should; attacks by Hispanic gangs happen all the time, and old women never attack anyone unless they're attacked first.

    14. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      You can't fight stereotypes with equally outrageous claims to the contrary

      I submit that you did precisely that by making broad generalizations about "the community". On closer reading your wording appears to be merely unfortunate, but then again your selected anecdote was to make ... what point, precisely?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    15. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Ruby+Wednesday · · Score: 1
      old women never attack anyone unless they're attacked first.

      You never met my grandma, did you?

    16. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Uncle+Kadigan · · Score: 1
      I once heard a gay activist emphatically state that almost all child molesters were heterosexual, including the ones that molested boys.

      Maybe he stated that because it's true.

      If you can produce a reputable, peer-reviewed study to the contrary, please share. Articles by Dailey and Cameron do not qualify.

    17. Re:I bet they got a better deal from the RIAA... by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      How is that a troll? Everything I said here is supported by the literature.

      Mod -1 unpopular expression

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  5. Make sense by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Funny

    It makes sense since the Boy Scouts of America shares its initials with the Business Software Alliance

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  6. Preaching to the choir by LunaticTippy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously, how big a threat are Boy Scouts to the content cartels? If they get the boy scouts on their side, who next? 80-year old fundamentalist grandmothers?

    They need to start something that'll get the cool kids. Like an anti-piracy gang. Complete with drugrunning and cap-bustin.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:Preaching to the choir by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      The question is how are they going to check. Are they going to monitor every boys scout's computer?

      Scout Leader : "Well Billy, you were pretty good about not pirating but we do need to talk about you accessing the 'MILF hunter' website."

    2. Re:Preaching to the choir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The boy scouts aren't the threat, they're the future leaders, theyre the pillars of the community that everyone looks up to. Everyone wants to be a boy sc--

      sorry, my co-workers are looking at me funny. Must have something to do with the racuous laughing.

      Seriously, while the Girl Scouts have been at least trying to keep with the times and push a message of individual empowerment, the BSA is this musty crypto-religious enclave trying to live in their own little fantasy Norman Rockwell world rather than actually be part of it. Folding the flag properly still gets hours of treatment by the BSA, but meanwhile over at Project Connect for the homeless, I still ain't seen a single scout.

      That the media outfits are enlisting the BSA shows how seriously out of touch they are with reality.

    3. Re:Preaching to the choir by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      ... the Girl Scouts have been at least trying to keep with the times and push a message of individual empowerment ...

      Otherwise known as the "tough little cookie" cartel. If you don't buy so many boxes of cookies, the younger girls will bite off your knee caps, the older girls will smack you around, and their mothers will report you as a child molester. Even the Hell's Angels won't mess with them. :P

    4. Re:Preaching to the choir by necro2607 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hella, son! I be down wif dat shizzle all up in this bitch!

    5. Re:Preaching to the choir by winomonkey · · Score: 1

      You see, it isn't that the scouts themselves are the threats. Nazi Germany had its Hitler-Jugend and Deutsches Yungvolk, both of which were organizations that trained up the youth to be proper citizens. Additionally, these children were turned into informants and quasi-police. Were the children a threat? No. They were a tool and a commodity to the party. Imagine a dorm full of college students (aka IP Pirates) with one or two scouts who are willing to inform the Powers that Be about all subversive music downloads occuring on campus? In all honesty, though, it will probably be some of these scouts who are the worst pirates. I know that one of my brother's little scout buddies is quite proud of his collection of Chinese-subtitled pirated movies that he torrented off of a variety of sites. Make the video, get the badge, and then sit around and listen to all of your ill-gotten music, okay kids?

    6. Re:Preaching to the choir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to trade tons of software at my Boy Scout meetings back in the 80s.

    7. Re:Preaching to the choir by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Seriously, how big a threat are Boy Scouts to the content cartels? If they get the boy scouts on their side, who next? 80-year old fundamentalist grandmothers?

      They need to start something that'll get the cool kids. Like an anti-piracy gang. Complete with drugrunning and cap-bustin.


      Hey, RIAA's a paranoid bunch. Remember the time they sued a grandmother who couldn't turn on a computer? Or when they sued a dead guy?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    8. Re:Preaching to the choir by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      hahah I can't believe someone actually modded that down (or modded it at all for that matter), sorry for trying to add some humour to the conversation... heh!

  7. first its not stealing post by crabpeople · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "create public service announcements urging others not to steal movies or music"

    Its not stealing, since you are not depriving anyone of the thing. Unless this merit badge is for going into record stores and lifting cds. Somehow I doubt it.

    The editors should be more careful with their phraseology.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    1. Re:first its not stealing post by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think you should blame the editors. The PSAs probably say "don't steal music". Your beef is with the BSA and why they use the word steal.

    2. Re:first its not stealing post by CastrTroy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, the word steal predates any laws which may use the word, and make the act of stealing illegal. I can say you are stealing my intellectual property by not paying me for it's use. It wouldn't technically be theft, in the sense of the law, but it's still immoral.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:first its not stealing post by webrunner · · Score: 1

      It's not theft in the sense of the word either.

      --
      ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
    4. Re:first its not stealing post by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its not stealing, since you are not depriving anyone of the thing.
      The editors should be more careful with their phraseology.

      It's straight from the article.
      And more to the point, it's the exact doublespeak that the RIAA wants to drill into these kid's heads, using them to spread their propaganda, astroturf style.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:first its not stealing post by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      :(

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:first its not stealing post by blindbug · · Score: 0
      The editors should be more careful with their phraseology.


      The problem is that most of the news editors ARE careful with their phraseology.... stealing (copyrighted music) is much more visible than violating (music copyright), even if it is not at all the same thing in the eyes of the law.
    7. Re:first its not stealing post by Score+Whore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure you are depriving someone of something. You are depriving a number of people of having their expectation of being paid for offering their work being satisfied. Exactly like if you went to a store and stole a CD, it's not the CD they are feeling deprived of, it's the sale of that CD. Just like if you go to a barber and don't pay him, it's not his time you've stolen, it's the expectation that he'll be paid for his time that isn't being met. Just like when someone takes out a line of credit in your name, it's not your identity being stolen, it's the expectation that you are held accountable to what you do and not what someone else does that is violated.

      Businesses and people who offer services or products are not concerned with being deprived of things, it's being deprived of the sale of the thing.

      Get over the language games and talk about the actual issue.

    8. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not stealing, since you are not depriving anyone of the thing.

      So you are ok with sneaking into a movie theater to sit in an otherwise empty seat?

    9. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    10. Re:first its not stealing post by kippers · · Score: 1

      FACT (the UK people for this sort of thing) say it *is* stealing.

      They brainwash us all with their forced adverts at the beginning of all legally purchaced films. Ironic.

    11. Re:first its not stealing post by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      "Get over the language games and talk about the actual issue."

      1) C'mon, this IS Slashdot.

      2) In case you haven't realized it yet - these semantic games represent the only argument people with that mind-set can really make. They know they can't justify the theft ethically/morally to any reasonable person (okay, okay, again I realize this IS Slashdot); so all they can hope to do is try steering things off towards some irrelevant tangent.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    12. Re:first its not stealing post by khayman80 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Businesses and people who offer services or products are not concerned with being deprived of things, it's being deprived of the sale of the thing.
      Under your definition, it seems like I'm "stealing" from a music store if I tape record a song from the radio and don't feel the need to buy the CD later. They're being deprived of a sale either way, right?

      Needless to say, I don't agree with this reasoning. When I copy a music file, I gain music but the music company doesn't lose anything physical at all, despite their claims to being deprived of a potential sale. This is a purely hypothetical loss on their part, based on the assumption that if I couldn't get the music via mininova, that I'd have no choice but to buy it at full price, in which case they've lost the sticker price of the CD. I think this reasoning is flawed for several reasons:

      (1): Some music I would buy for $5 or listen to if it's free, but I wouldn't pay $20 for the CD. In some instances, music that I would pirate I would not buy, even if I was unable to obtain the music through P2P networks. This means that in a situation like this, the music company is only "losing" the amount of money that I would actually pay for the music. The problem is that the RIAA is treating their product as though it's a commodity, like it's water... and we have no choice but to either buy it from them, steal it, or die of thirst.

      (2): I could just as easily buy the CD from a friend or from a store that sells used CDs, in which case the RIAA has lost nothing.

      In short, I believe that you are correct that being deprived of a sale constitutes stealing, especially in the cases you mentioned. What I'm disputing is that copyright infringement necessarily deprives anyone of a sale.

    13. Re:first its not stealing post by instagib · · Score: 1

      > You are depriving a number of people of having their expectation of being paid for offering their work being satisfied.

      Isn't this exactly what is faulty about all of the MI's claims concerning "online piracy"? Because, if one would analyze the mindset of content downloaders (*), the result is that whatever they download, they would not have bought it ANYWAY. So, the only bad thing they're doing is enjoying content without paying. Which would make feel bad those people actually paying for content, but not the copyright holders.

      (*) I am, of course, not talking about those who resell downloaded content. It's about the masses of casual downloaders.

    14. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me get this straight. You're talking about psychological harm due to the artist knowing that some people are enjoying his music without having bought the CD?

      That's not depriving someone of something. Heck there could be trillions of aliens enjoying our content from a parallel universe.

      You can't be deprived of your expectation. If anything, you just expected wrong.

    15. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever given out your credit card number?

    16. Re:first its not stealing post by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      It's not stealing. Period. Do you see people being arrested for it? No. Why? IT'S NOT A ^&%@%$@) CRIME. It's copywrite infringement, which is a civil tort.

    17. Re:first its not stealing post by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      I find it quite shocking the anti-piracy ads at the start of legally purchased DVDs these days. It's annoying that they can't be done for blatent lying, as you point out they clearly refer state that "copyright infringement" is "theft" when clearly there different laws and totally different areas of the law. Whats worse though is that they even compare it to much more serious crimes like mugging, burglary and shoplifting; all of which are actually criminal offences.

      Personally I can't help but wonder if this is seriosuly counter-productive. They are telling people who have actually paid the ridiculously high price of a DVD that they could have got it for free if they downloaded it.

    18. Re:first its not stealing post by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No.

      Jesus. This is such a broken record.

      to use YOUR article for the example.

      It's like watching the barber cut someone's hair, and cutting your own hair and he sues you because he's a magical barber like magicians and expects to get paid for the REST OF HIS LIFE and 50 YEARS after HE DIES for cutting hair in a PARTICULAR pattern and way with particular tools.

      Not to mention that 99% of the stuff downloaded would never have been purchased at the desired price.
      Not to mention that 80% of the stuff will probably never be listened too or only listened to once.
      Not to mention that the 20% that is listened to will probably expand the market.
      Not to mention that lots of people are as moral as they afford to be and when they make more money, they'll buy the products if they like them since they want the "real" thing.
      Not to mention the products that you *can't BUY period* and can only get these ways.

      Seriously- if barbers were like musicians, the fact that they wet the right side of your head, combed it back, then combed a row and clipped it with no.6 scissors would be equivalent to a "chord" and they could sue other barbers for cutting hair using the same sequence of "chords" and ever barber who invented a new haircut (like "the bob cut" or the "monica cut" or the "shag cut" could copyright it.

      Then they could sue the hell out of anyone who cut hair that way (including people who cut their own hair) and they would add a .25 cent fee to any hair cut of that style for the rest of their lives and for 50 years after they die which would be paid to a big "hair cut production company" that had rights to that style of hair cut.

      Why are musicians SO MUCH better than a barber who invites a new style of hair cut?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    19. Re:first its not stealing post by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The actual issue that people who created things years ago have stopped doing any interesting new work or contributing to society, yet still expect to get paid?

      Or the actual issue that these copyrights do nothing but stifle everything except "approved creativity". Ask Apotheosis about that one.

      Maybe the actual issue of companies like Disney leeching off of public domain works and parlaying them into a profit, but then lobbying to keep their work out of the public domain and giving others the same benefit they had?

      Or maybe you just wish you were one of those entitled "artists" in the above categories.

    20. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you weren't a simpleton you'd understand that words do matter. It isn't a "semantic game" to apply the correct words to the actions they describe.

      There's a long history of people with a clue recognizing the difference between physical property and the rights attached to it, and the ethereal creations of arts and science. That is why the laws for handling the creations of arts and science are explicitely spelled out in the US Constitution.

      By not recognizing the difference you only show what little understanding you have of the issue.

    21. Re:first its not stealing post by Score+Whore · · Score: 1
      Under your definition, it seems like I'm "stealing" from a music store if I tape record a song from the radio and don't feel the need to buy the CD later. They're being deprived of a sale either way, right?


      You clearly don't understand my point. A music store buys the right to make up to 100 sales when they purchase 100 CDs from a distributor. That distributor bought the right to make up to X thousand sales when they purchased X thousand CDs from a manufacturer. That manufacturer bought the right to make up to Y tens of thousands of sales when they entered into a contract with the publishing company. Which bought the right to make up to Z millions of sales when they worked with the artist to produce the work. The radio station bought the right to play a particular song X number of times. But that is completely seperate from the music stores situation. The music store only loses out when you take one of the specific CDs that represent one of their specific sales. But they aren't going to miss the CD, they will miss the sale of that CD.

      (2): I could just as easily buy the CD from a friend or from a store that sells used CDs, in which case the RIAA has lost nothing.


      Absolutely. And while some artists have said that they would like to be paid every time a CD is bought or sold regardless if it's the exact same CD being bought and sold, the laws and courts say otherwise. People who would argue that someone is being deprived when you download a song would not argue that anyone is being deprived when you sell your lawfully obtained CD. You bought the right to sell up to 1 CD when you buy 1 CD from a music store.

      What I'm disputing is that copyright infringement necessarily deprives anyone of a sale.


      Certainly it doesn't deprive them of a sale. It deprives them of having their expectation to be compensated for their work being satisfied. Just like if your employer decided not to pay you for the last two weeks work doesn't deprive you of money, it just deprives you of having your expectation of being compensated for your work being satisfied.
    22. Re:first its not stealing post by m-wielgo · · Score: 1

      The last CD I bought was in 1998. If I didn't download music... I wouldn't be buying the CD anyways, the radio would be "good enough" and I'd be happy with that.

    23. Re:first its not stealing post by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1
      In some instances, music that I would pirate I would not buy, even if I was unable to obtain the music through P2P networks.

      Which is why I have a firm no-RIAA policy when purchasing music. That way, I can truthfully say that when I pirate their music, the RIAA does not lose a single sale!
    24. Re:first its not stealing post by jZnat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, but the legal law of the land (17 USC in this case) doesn't mention the word "steal" or "theft" or any other similar word in the context of copyright infringement. Thanks for playing the Legalese v. Colloquialisms Game; you lost.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    25. Re:first its not stealing post by orzetto · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Just like if you go to a barber and don't pay him, it's not his time you've stolen, it's the expectation that he'll be paid for his time that isn't being met.

      In this case, you would have stolen a service, not a ware, and it is still stealing because the barber had to do work for that instance of the service. However, if you could somehow download a good shave and haircut every morning, and a barber sued you because of that, then you would have a similarity to IP infringement. And I can imagine the world laughing at a barber trying to prevent people from shaving themselves and requiring them to come to his shop.

      Just like when someone takes out a line of credit in your name, it's not your identity being stolen,

      This is even simpler than the previous example, this is outright theft out of my pocket because I receive a direct damage. Violating IP is not directly damaging anyone, though one may argue about the indirect effects.

      IP is different from material property in that it can be endlessly multiplied. It's like bakers and fishermen suing Jesus Christ for stealing their bread and fish.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    26. Re:first its not stealing post by khayman80 · · Score: 1
      But they aren't going to miss the CD, they will miss the sale of that CD.
      If I walk out of a store with a CD that I didn't pay for, then the store has lost a sale. If I walk into a store and copy the CD with a portable CD copier, then the CD is still in the store and can be purchased by someone else. The music store is only losing a sale in this instance if I have the means to buy the CD, want to buy the CD at the sale price, don't know anywhere else to get the CD cheaper (friend, used store, etc), and don't buy the CD only because I now have a free copy. Are we on the same wavelength here?

      Certainly it doesn't deprive them of a sale. It deprives them of having their expectation to be compensated for their work being satisfied. Just like if your employer decided not to pay you for the last two weeks work doesn't deprive you of money, it just deprives you of having your expectation of being compensated for your work being satisfied.
      You're right- I don't understand what you're saying. I completely agree that if your employer doesn't pay you for work you've already done, then he's broken a contract (work for money), which is theft in spirit if not in letter. I just don't see how it's relevant to copyright infringement, because no artist is given a contract saying that X number of their albums WILL be bought by consumers, whereas any employee has a contract stating that X hours worked equals Y dollars in paycheck.
    27. Re:first its not stealing post by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      So you are ok with sneaking into a movie theater to sit in an otherwise empty seat?

            No, the problem here is trespassing. Hollywood or the theatre don't lose a cent though, unless you damage the seat.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    28. Re:first its not stealing post by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      And-- for now at least, you can legally record off the radio.

      It's rapidly becoming impossible/illegal to do so however.

      Another right lost.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    29. Re:first its not stealing post by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      You're talking about psychological harm due to the artist knowing that some people are enjoying his music without having bought the CD?

            I can envision how much psychological harm the artist would undergo if s/he found out exactly how much profit the record label is making from their work...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    30. Re:first its not stealing post by Score+Whore · · Score: 1
      The actual issue that people who created things years ago have stopped doing any interesting new work or contributing to society, yet still expect to get paid?


      So what you are saying is you want what they created but you don't want to pay for it? Ie. you see that it has value but you want that value for free? Got it.

      Or the actual issue that these copyrights do nothing but stifle everything except "approved creativity". Ask Apotheosis about that one.


      So intead of going back to the original folk material they wanted to go off from Orff's unique derivative of that work. And they wanted it for free? Got it.

      Maybe the actual issue of companies like Disney leeching off of public domain works and parlaying them into a profit, but then lobbying to keep their work out of the public domain and giving others the same benefit they had?


      So go out there and create your own derivative work from those original public domain sources. Oh wait, what you mean to say is that you want to take Disney's rendition of those public domain works and use that? Only you don't want to pay for it? Got it.

      Admit it. You're a cheap bastard who wants free shit. I'm fine with that. But don't try and rationalize that crap.
    31. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel guilty. I am depriving Christina Aguilera of all of the money from the sales of hundreds (hell, millions) of her CDs that I haven't bought and never will buy because her music fucking sucks.

    32. Re:first its not stealing post by cliffski · · Score: 0

      your logic is flawed. I wont even address the silliness reagrding comparing music to water. You need water. You wont die of thirst because you dont have the latest coldplay album.

      Someone has made a product and decided, given what they know of the market (which will be more than you know, they have access to all the sales data), to set their price at $20.
      You may think "oh Ill only pay $5 for it". And thats up to you. in which case...

      no sale.

      This isnt a problem. The store knows some people would have paid $5, and they lose that money. they also know some would have paid $30. those people got a good deal. Often, a system of tiered products is arranged to capture as much of the market as possible. This is done at the discretion of the store. These tiered systems can ONLY work, if its impossible to cross tiers. A discount for the elderly is not easily faked. A midday matinee discount cannot be faked. Student discounts require ID etc etc. Games get discounted after a certain period. Again, impossible to cross tiers.

      The problem with your system, where you allow the customer to choose which price tier to place themselves is this:

      Everyone chooses the cheapest tier.

      This is just human nature, and elementary game theory. It makes lost of sense to choose to get it for $5. why pay more? Presumably *someone else* will pay $20.

      If thats the option, and everyone behaves rationally, everyone pays the rock bottom price. granted we all like to feel warm and fuzzy knowing *someone else* is paying higher prices, which makes it possible for me to get it cheap, but the problem is, that *someone else* is now also paying rock bottom and thinking you are paying full whack.
      The next thing you know, that company goes out of business, because they earned a pittance, despite maing a hugely successfull product.

      there is a good reason that a venture capitalist will laugh at you if you want to make a film like "the lord of the rings" but make it donationware. That isnt a viable business model, and we all know it.

      If your approach to the market cannot scale up to encompass all of the market, then by definition, you are leeching of other people paying for your entertainment. Its fine if you pay $5 and everyone else ays $20. Its when we all pay $5 that the system collapses. You might think music is too expensive entirely. Fine. I think sushi and ferraris are overpriced, but the market works fine, because it supports those sushi lovers and ferrari drivers who think differently. If you let me pay $100 for a ferrari, they wont pay mroe either, they arent stupid, and suddenly, we just killed off the market for both those products. At a much lower leevl, the same is happening to software, movies, tv shows and games.
      Im not suprised the MPAA RIAAA etc are trying to reverse the thinking thats causing this. If everyone thought like you, there wouldnt be much to look forward to in the software / games / movie business.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    33. Re:first its not stealing post by Jalestra · · Score: 1

      But wouldn't that be more like breaking a promise or failure to hold up your end of an agreement? Both of which are not, technically, theft itself, tho one is illegal.

      --
      I'll be enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it
    34. Re:first its not stealing post by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Strange, none of those examples were hypothetical sales (which the **AA is counting). If you physically steal an object the prior owner can't sell it anymore, nor do they have the benefit of using it. If you download a song, the **AA can *still* sell as many copies as they want to. Downloads also aren't equal to a hypothetical sale. With a service, like a haircut, there's an agreement of payment upon its completion. If I download a song from a random person non-affiliated with the **AA, there is no such agreement.

      Words are a method of communication. Communication doesn't work unless all parties involved share a common set of definitions. Even scarier, most people also use words to think. Read 1984 if you don't get the implications of this. We don't call copyright infringement stealing because it's not the same thing. That's why there's a different word for it!

      As for playing the language game, I do it because because it matters. If you broaden the definition of stealing to accomidate copyright infringement then it loses much of its meaning. You'd might as well call it child molesting. Oh no, people are "raping" the **AA's "children"! It might make your strawman a little bit stronger.

      But, just for fun, lets broaden the definition of stealing to include anytime someone causes a hypothetical loss. So, if I invite someone to play a game or something, thus preventing them from shopping and spending money, then I've stolen from a store, right? Or how about the time I spend waiting in line? Hypothetically I could do something very profitable with that time, so am I entitled to sue the people in front of me for that money or have them arrested for theft? Personally, I'm completely against stealing. I think copyright infringement, however, is in serious need of reform. (Heaven forbid that I actually have a different opinion about the two; afterall, aren't they the same thing?)

    35. Re:first its not stealing post by khayman80 · · Score: 1
      You bought the right to sell up to 1 CD when you buy 1 CD from a music store.
      I just wanted to mention that, even though this is true for CDs, I'm not sure that it's possible for most forms of legally downloaded music (i.e. music with DRM). Does anyone know?

      I worry that, in the future, this basic "right of resale" won't still be around because it will be impossible to implement without excessively harsh technological restrictions. And, yes, I know that "excessively harsh" is a subjective judgment on my part...

    36. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say hello to the "No Electronic Theft" act

      captcha: apathy.. meh

    37. Re:first its not stealing post by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      The actual issue that people who created things years ago have stopped doing any interesting new work or contributing to society, yet still expect to get paid?
      Yet, by this same argument, that work still holds value - if it didn't, no-one would be paying them for it, and no-one would want to copy it either.

      The fact is that, even if no one is prepared to buy it, if just one person is prepared to copy it then it still has some value. It's just lower than the price the rights holder is asking.

      And that little tidbit right there is the real problem with (current manifestations of) IP - it's bordering on legalised extortion...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    38. Re:first its not stealing post by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Hush! Don't give them any ideas! And to anyone thinking about modding this funny - go away. I'm dead serious.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    39. Re:first its not stealing post by Score+Whore · · Score: 1
      I just don't see how it's relevant to copyright infringement, because no artist is given a contract saying that X number of their albums WILL be bought by consumers, whereas any employee has a contract stating that X hours worked equals Y dollars in paycheck.


      Some artists receive exactly the deal you describe, ie. they will be advanced X number of dollars to be repaid against royalties. Some employees are paid on commission. But all artists are given a particular "contract" by the government. That contract states that anyone who wants to legally have a copy of the artists work will have to pay the artist what the artist is asking. Effectively a "paid on commission" situation.
    40. Re:first its not stealing post by Score+Whore · · Score: 1
      Strange, none of those examples were hypothetical sales (which the **AA is counting). If you physically steal an object the prior owner can't sell it anymore, nor do they have the benefit of using it. If you download a song, the **AA can *still* sell as many copies as they want to. Downloads also aren't equal to a hypothetical sale. With a service, like a haircut, there's an agreement of payment upon its completion. If I download a song from a random person non-affiliated with the **AA, there is no such agreement.


      The only reason you are arguing is because you aren't willing to admit you are totally and completely wrong. It has nothing to do with hypothetical v. real, service v. product. The law says if you want to get a piece of IP (song, movie, book, etc.) then you have to pay the price asked for it. If I were an artist and made a product I can expect that everyone who wants that product will pay me. It has nothing to do with how hard it is to make a copy of my work. It has nothing to do with whether you would have paid the price I am asking for my work. It is exactly like going to someone who provides a service, receiving that service and then having to pay for it.

      When you download a song, movie, piece of software, etc. you get the product. As such if you choose not to pay then you are depriving the person who has a legal right to sell/copy/distribute that product whatever payment they are entitled to receive. The argument that you wouldn't have bought it is exactly as valid as going to a barber, getting the haircut/shave and then arguing that you wouldn't pay for a haircut and shave so you aren't going to pay for a haircut and shave.

      BTW I never said anyone is stealing, I said someone is being deprived of something.
    41. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason you are arguing is because you aren't willing to admit you are totally and completely wrong.
      Wow, you should join a debate team with that one.

      The law says if you want to get a piece of IP (song, movie, book, etc.) then you have to pay the price asked for it.
      Umm... no? Otherwise free software couldn't exist. (You could say they're asking for a $0 price, but that doesn't address re-distribution.) IANAL, but AFAIK the law says that the owner of IP has the right to control its distribution. Not the same thing.

      The argument that you wouldn't have bought it is exactly as valid as going to a barber, getting the haircut/shave and then arguing that you wouldn't pay for a haircut and shave so you aren't going to pay for a haircut and shave.
      Did you even read my post? If you did then you must not have understood it. I addressed that exact example in it. Also, I didn't ever argue that one "wouldn't have bought it". I mention that downloads != purchaces. I imply that the conversion ratio between the two isn't 1, not that it is 0. You need to work on that reading comprehension.

      BTW I never said anyone is stealing

      Perhaps not explicitly. But, you opened your post countering the arguement that it's not stealing because there is no deprivation. So that means that it is stealing because there is a deprivation. Also "exactly like if you went to a store and stole", kinda toasts the idea that you weren't equating deprivation to stealing.

      Let me put it in simplier terms since there seems to be a lack of communication here. Deprivation isn't illegal (or unethical) in and of itself. You, for instance, have deprived me of a few minutes of my time. That's not illegal or unethical, but you have deprived me. If I stop someone from shopping then I've deprived a store of a sale, but that's not illegal or unethical. If I illegally download a song from the internet then I haven't stolen or deprived anyone of anything, I've illegally aquired it. The illegal part stems from the distribution channel, not with the aquisition of the song. I can't enter into an agreement with someone that I've never interacted with, so it's not like the barber/service example. I also am not reducing their ability to sale or to use said song, so I'm not stealing from them. And, like I've said before, deprivation isn't illegal; so "depriving them of payment" is irrelevalent. If that were the part the **AA had problems with then they would only be able to sue people for ~$1 per song downloaded, or at most ~$20 for each album containing one or more songs they downloaded. Read the MPAA warning the next time you watch a movie. The penalty isn't to recover costs that they've been deprived of, it's to control distribution. Ethically, "downloading copyrighted material without consent of the intellectual property holder" is probably wrong, and it's also illegal, but NOT for the reason you are arguing.

    42. Re:first its not stealing post by PitaBred · · Score: 2

      Of course it has value. But that value should belong to society after it's creator has profited from it. Artists are supposed to work and contribute to society. Copyright is to encourage that. It's not a gravy train.

      And Orff already profited from his work. Now Apotheosis did something very interesting, new and exciting with it, thus increasing the value of Orff's work and their own, something that never would have happened before without Orff's work.

      And do you know WHERE public domain sources come from? They come from people who create things, and then they stop having dominion over whether or not you can copy that work (their copyright runs out). Disney is leveraging the PREVIOUS creative works of people for their own creative works, but they want to DENY that ability to other people. Doesn't seem fair, does it?

      But then again, you're a fucking moron. I get it fine. I'm not rationalizing anything, I'm putting things into perspective, which you are too myopic to percieve.

    43. Re:first its not stealing post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are depriving a number of people of having their expectation of being paid for offering their work being satisfied.

      Eat shit, you mindfucking lunatic. The "poor starving artists" are getting far more severely and viciously fucked by their **AA overlords to whom they've sold their asses than by me. If I do an "illegal" download, the artist may be out a few cents. But he's already been fucked out of at least ten dollars by "the industry". Why aren't they taking their overlords to court instead of whining about the few cents I've deprived them of?

  8. fair use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing that fair use won't be part of the learning experience.

    1. Re:fair use by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Fair Use is a separate badge, but to earn it you have to break the DMCA laws, which ironically gets you kicked out of scouts.

    2. Re:fair use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference in "Fair Use" and downloading someone elses copy of a movie/song.

    3. Re:fair use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think fair use has something to do with downloading copyrighted material without paying for it, you don't qualify for a fair use patch. Maybe you should go work on your knots instead.

    4. Re:fair use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you think fair use has something to do with downloading copyrighted material without paying for it, you don't qualify for a fair use patch. Maybe you should go work on your knots instead.

      Ah, yes -- concentrate only on the part of the law that benefits the corporation while ignoring the parts which deprive the consumer of the fair use defense and their right of first sale.

      I'm guessing that you view all the false positives generated by WMA as mere inconveniences to the user/owner, rather than as being effectively fucking theft by the ex post facto MS-EULA of the VERY PHYSICAL computer which I purchased, own and can no longer use.

      Why don't you give yourself an enema with all the crocodile tears you're pouring out.

  9. Positively Orwellian ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This reminds me of the children in 1984 who were trained to turn anyone who may have comitted a thought-crime.

    I realize the Boy Scouts like to try to teach morals and the like, but it doesn't sit well that the *AA's would be able to create a new merit badge and start indoctrinating them.

    Errie.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by User+956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it doesn't sit well that the *AA's would be able to create a new merit badge and start indoctrinating them.

      The boy scouts of today are the politicians of the future. I can see where the RIAA is going with this.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indoctrinating them to not break the law? What are you in the mob? Sorry if it's uncool to not pirate but you have a very twisted perspective on the world. Do it if you have to but don't rationalize that you are the good guys. Saying I deserve this while you're robbing a bank or liquor store doesn't make it right it just makes it so you can sleep night and look in a mirror. I'm not a fan of scouting but they are supposed to be about teaching values and teaching kids to not take what doesn't belong to them are traditionally considered good values. When some one takes the stereo out of your car do you say "hey he probably deserved it"? You can mod this down and the pirate up but it doesn't change anything.

    3. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of the children in 1984 who were trained to turn anyone who may have comitted a thought-crime.

      Back when I was in the Boy Scouts (mumble years ago) we were taught that reporting and preventing crime was a good thing.
       
       
      I realize the Boy Scouts like to try to teach morals and the like, but it doesn't sit well that the *AA's would be able to create a new merit badge and start indoctrinating them.

      Ah yes - teaching people that breaking the law is wrong is immoral and 'indoctrination'.
       
      Don't get me wrong here - I don't think modern IP/Copyright/whatever law is correct, but it is the law. Media pirates and thieves are on the wrong side of it - period.
    4. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      +4 Funny?

      Seems more +1000 disturbingly accurate to me.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    5. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      The problem isn't the "not breaking the law", but the brainwashing that breaking one corporate statute is identical to committing a number of other more serious social crimes. It would be similar to getting a badge for making public service announcements about how driving above the speed limit is an act of murder. Sure, there is some correlation, but the two things are not the same. The **AA want their own twisted version of reality to become the de-facto standard -- kind of like SCO in their "Copyright" case. Sure, wilfully infringing other people's copyright is wrong in our current legal climate, but I'm sure you do it all the time. Case in point: have you ever sung a song without paying ASCAP? Have you ever cooked something without paying royalties to the person who invented the recipe? Have you ever used a photocopier without getting permission from the original rights holder? Have you ever circulated something you got off the internet without permission? Have you ever written something without citing sources of all non-original thought? Have you ever driven over the speed limit? Have you ever stolen other people's posessions by use of force on the high seas? Have you ever willfully killed another human being? Have you ever lied about where you found out about any piece of information, or misrepresented said information? Especially to someone who legally had the right to know the truth? Have you ever bypassed some sort of physical barrier to entry without authorization? Have you ever done the same with intellectual property?

      Sorry, but equating the parent's indignation with being in the mob is similar to equating your indignation with being fascist -- it ain't necessarily so; there's a lot of middle ground, no matter where a persons' ideology lines up with the various laws of the land.

      Piracy is wrong, and should be stamped out.

      Property theft is wrong, and should be punished.

      Copyright infringement is often immoral and illegal, sometimes not both at the same time. It should be avoided whenever possible, and forgiven when it takes place without intent to harm.

      Maybe what we need is more balance in the punishment: for every bit of intellectual property someone publishes that doesn't belong to them, the victim is allowed to publish a piece of the infringer's IP. Sure, some might say "hey... I might as well... I've got nothing to steal," but when that bit of info is their credit card number, or even an embarassing chat log, they might decide to reconsider.

    6. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Reverend528 · · Score: 1
      The boy scouts of today are the politicians of the future. I can see where the RIAA is going with this.

      Well, at a certain age, it will be harder to bribe them with merit badges.

    7. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's why 12 year olds should rat out their parents for light recreational drug use, get taken by the state, the parents put in prison.

      Not all laws are moral.

      Increasingly laws are immoral.

      God in East Germany they ratted out their parents for watching TV shows. Some of the parents basically just disappeared.

      But hey- IT'S THE LAW.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I realize the Boy Scouts like to try to teach morals and the like, but it doesn't sit well that the *AA's would be able to create a new merit badge and start indoctrinating them.

      I've never like the concept of the boy scouts. I really didn't want my boy to be part of the boy scouts. I lost out of that arguement with my wife because her brother happened to be a scout. I've always viewed the Boy Scouts as the US version of the Hilter Youth. Things like that only confirm that opinion. Our girl is part of the cookie mafia... the girl scouts. I've never liked them either. (I think that's mainly because I just hated seeing US girls dressed up like that. I can live with Anime girls dressed goofy like that, but I don't like real people dressing that way. ;)

    9. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by owlnation · · Score: 1

      It's not just in Orwellian fiction. In East Berlin the FDJ - an equivalent of the Scouts - used to do many things to aid the state in keeping the Proles on-message.

      Not the least of which was turning TV antennae back to face the East to stop people watching Western TV.

      Course, this is a major step towards civilisation from the Hitler Youth a few years earlier. And not surprisingly - and fortunately, since there's still a big problem - German kids are forbidden from wearing uniforms in organisations these days. Otherwise, they'd probably be doing a completely different sort of DVD burning...

      Coincidently I read 1984 again a few days ago. It struck me that Orwell's vision of the future was completely wrong. The 80's were freedom, spending and decadence. Should he instead have named it 2004 then it would've beem painfully close to the truth. Are we at war with Eastasia or Eurasia again? I forget...

    10. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Insert congressional scandal joke here.)

    11. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Well, at a certain age, it will be harder to bribe them with merit badges.

      One of the BSA/RIAA/MPAA's worries has to be that politicians hostile to them will come into office. If they work on training a generation of politically active individuals who share their copyright opinions, that's less likely.

      For example, imagine if the Computers merit badge had a history component that discussed Linux. Particularly, what if the discussion of requirement 1 (history of computing) or 8 (is it ok to accept a free copy of a computer program from a friend) required the two-part answer "Not if it's closed-source commercial software, but absolutely yes if it's freeware or opensource". Then every Boy Scout who does the merit badge (which due to its ease is popular) knows about OSS. Or if this merit badge about copyright talked about how the average musicians get screwed by record labels. Or how the RIAA/MPAA use very shady legal tactics.

      If you've trained someone by age 18 to accept an idea, it becomes harder to get them to change their mind. Then the RIAA gets another generation of "upstanding people" who agree with them 100%.

    12. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Rix · · Score: 1

      Ah yes - teaching people that breaking the law is wrong is immoral and 'indoctrination'.

      Yes, it is. It is your civic duty to evaluate all laws, and if you find them lacking, work against them. Teaching children that the law is moral by definition is the most disgusting thing I can imagine.

    13. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Yes but the pirates of today are the voters of tommorow.

      Where they are going looks a lot like a brick wall.

    14. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Ah yes - teaching people that breaking the law is wrong is immoral and 'indoctrination'.

      Well, did Rosa Parks do something wrong and immoral when she refused to give up her seat in the Black section of the bus to a white man? How about all the people that illegally formed the Underground Railroad? Notice, I'm not comparing these actions to any current laws, but I'm just pointing out that teaching someone that all laws are necessarily good and that it is more important to follow the law than think independently *is* indoctrination. It is immoral to turn your neighbor in for being a Jew. Being a snitch does not necessarily make one morally right.

      Back when I was in the Boy Scouts (mumble years ago) we were taught that reporting and preventing crime was a good thing.

      And when I was in it, I don't remember any such thing. You are supposed to help people. I don't remember anyone telling me that I was morally bound to help a corporation (a person in the eyes of the law is not a person in my eyes). Which is better, send someone to jail for a victimless crime to enforce corporate policy, or look the other way when a friend does something you think they shouldn't but isn't hurting anyone? I remember more on critical and independent thinking in the Scouts, rather than blind obedience to faceless corporations. You must have been in a different troupe.

      Note, I'm not defending people that violate copyright law, but stating that law must be examined, not blindly followed when wrong. The checks and balances on bad laws include the people simply ignoring them. Bad laws should not be followed.

    15. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Ah yes - teaching people that breaking the law is wrong is immoral and 'indoctrination'.
      Yes, it is. It is your civic duty to evaluate all laws, and if you find them lacking, work against them.

      Thats certainly true - but it has absolutely nothing to do with my statement. (And 'working against' is not the same as 'breaking'.)
       
       
      Teaching children that the law is moral by definition is the most disgusting thing I can imagine.

      If the law isn't moral by definition - then you have niether laws nor morals, only anarchy.
    16. Re:Positively Orwellian ... by Rix · · Score: 1

      Thats certainly true - but it has absolutely nothing to do with my statement. (And 'working against' is not the same as 'breaking'.)

      Not always, but usually it is. Change rarely happens in western civilization without people openly defying what they see as wrong.

      If the law isn't moral by definition - then you have niether laws nor morals, only anarchy.

      Wrong. If morality is defined as law, or vice versa (even in subset), neither holds any meaning. Law is an attempt at encapsulating morality, and as such it can never be wholey moral. Your logic would have almost all the advances of any merit stillborn out of an irrational fear of breaking the law.

  10. Learn a merit badge?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this some odd dialect of English with which I am unfamiliar?

    Perhaps similar to saying "I learned 'em real good!" to indicate having taught someone well?

  11. The Horror by NaCh0 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    How dare boys learn about copyright laws. Come'on slashdot, get a grip. You can't change the system if you don't understand it first.

    1. Re:The Horror by tddoog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you think the education provided by the MPAA will be even handed?

    2. Re:The Horror by Endo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right. You just turn all your kids over to us and we'll explain to them EXACTLY how copyright laws work. Of course, we'll also just tell you the parts that make our 'cause' look good, but that's how it should be right?

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    3. Re:The Horror by swillden · · Score: 1

      How dare boys learn about copyright laws.

      It's fine if they learn about all of copyright law, and it's history, purpose and the underlying social contract, not just the bits that the RIAA and MPAA like.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:The Horror by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      This is not teaching them about copyrights. This is teaching them to think a certain way irregardless of the facts surrounding the situation.

  12. As I understand them, by justinbach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Merit badges are typically awarded for the completion of a task (hiking, camping, good works, &c), not for passively NOT doing something. Is there a merit badge for not smoking? How about for not cheating on exams?
    These qualities are important, sure, but to dangle a badge as a carrot for not doing something wrong seems a like it's missing the point. Boy Scouts have a code and moral values (including those that would keep you from pirating software, smoking, and cheating) are implicit therein; further bribery, especially in the form of badges, seems unwarranted.

    --
    I left my wallet in El Sigundo!
    1. Re:As I understand them, by justinbach · · Score: 1

      Ah, sorry, classic Slashdot syndrome...I should've RTFA to find out that there ARE activities required for completion. Still, I'm not gonna apologize for being a crotchety condescending curmudgeon.

      --
      I left my wallet in El Sigundo!
    2. Re:As I understand them, by jamar0303 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it's for promoting the act of "not pirating", not just for "not pirating" (as far as I can tell).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    3. Re:As I understand them, by Pale-Horse-Rider · · Score: 2, Informative

      This isn't a Merit Badge for not doing something. It's a Merit Badge for taking the time to learn about the laws of the nation in which one resides-- lots of precedence for this in other Scouting Merit Badges.

      --
      Don't you hate pants?
    4. Re:As I understand them, by pluther · · Score: 4, Funny
      It isn't for not pirating, it's for actively opposing piracy:

      From TFA:

      Scouts will be instructed in the basics of copyright law and learn how to identify five types of copyrighted works and three ways copyrighted materials may be stolen.

      Scouts also must choose one activity from a list that includes visiting a movie studio to see how many people can be harmed by film piracy. They also can create public service announcements urging others not to steal movies or music.

      Some of this was also quoted in the summary. Now c'mon, we all sometimes respond without reading the article, but to skip the summary??

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    5. Re:As I understand them, by justinbach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey guys, c'mon--be nice. As soon as I put up the original post, I realized that I had made this (quite obvious) mistake, and I was the first person to call myself on it.

      Can't you read the replies to make sure that your point hasn't already been made before pointing fingers?

      --
      I left my wallet in El Sigundo!
    6. Re:As I understand them, by thewils · · Score: 1

      That's a shame, I had this mental picture of little Jimmy, up before the Troopmaster in front of the rest of the squad, having his non-piracy patch ripped off and his sword broken in two before being booted out - just like Chuck Connors in "Branded".

      I guess that dates me...

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    7. Re:As I understand them, by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Merit badges are typically awarded for the completion of a task (hiking, camping, good works, &c), not for passively NOT doing something.

      If you can't be bothered to read TFA, at least read the summary;
      • Scouts will now be able to learn a merit badge for anti-piracy related activities, including create public service announcements urging others not to steal movies or music. (Emphasis added for the clue impaired.)
    8. Re:As I understand them, by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      If merit badges can help scouts determine which torrent is actually The Matrix and which is gay porn masquerading as The Matrix, so much the better! I have yet to master that art, myself.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    9. Re:As I understand them, by pyser · · Score: 1

      It's a Merit Badge for taking the time to learn about the laws of the nation in which one resides-- lots of precedence for this in other Scouting Merit Badges.

      Then why do we need yet another MB? Wouldn't the subject matter fit nicely under Crime Prevention? The Citizenship in the Nation and Cit in the Community MBs also cover the duties and responsibilities of a citizen, one of which is to obey the law. How about adding a requirement under the various art and performance MBs like Art, Music, Cinematography and Theater? Something like "Explain to your counselor what intellectual property is. Explain why an artist should have a right to be compensated for his work. Learn about copyright laws." That's all that's really needed.

      Don't get me wrong -- I believe in respecting copyright laws. I'm not advocating that young people should pirate intellectual works. I just think that the motion picture industry should not be using the Boy Scouts of America as a vehicle to get its agenda across.

    10. Re:As I understand them, by kabocox · · Score: 1

      These qualities are important, sure, but to dangle a badge as a carrot for not doing something wrong seems a like it's missing the point. Boy Scouts have a code and moral values (including those that would keep you from pirating software, smoking, and cheating) are implicit therein; further bribery, especially in the form of badges, seems unwarranted.

      You haven't actually met too many boy scouts have you? I've never liked the organization, but after finding out which guys in my age group were members made it certain that I'd never really trust a scout. Sorry they are far more likely to be a politican or petty backstabber. As far as having those morals and following them, well I've seen my share of scouts do each one of those things that you say are againt their code of conduct. Sorry, but I try not to associate with self rightous pricks. That's why don't really do the Christainity thing although that's what I was raised to. I've observed far too mainy of the same type of people in most churches and would rather not share any of my time with them. My wife and co-workers call me anti-social. I tend to think of it more that there isn't anyone local that I want to be social with. I don't want to do the PTA thing, the Scout Leader thing, or the Church thing. Where I happen to be, on-line friendships don't count. If you can't physically produce 'em, they don't exist to these locals. Oh, and they wonder why I'm anti-social to them.

    11. Re:As I understand them, by justinbach · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but I try not to associate with self rightous pricks.


      Do you realize where you're POSTING?!?
      --
      I left my wallet in El Sigundo!
    12. Re:As I understand them, by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Something like "Explain to your counselor what intellectual property is. Explain why an artist should have a right to be compensated for his work. Learn about copyright laws." That's all that's really needed.

      Better yet, how about "Explain to your counselor why 'intellectual property' is an intellectually dishonest term. Explain why the idea of compensating the artist for his work is missing the point. Learn about what copyright laws are actually for (hint: 'To Promote the Progress of Science and the Useful Arts...')." instead?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:As I understand them, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      modded insightful? It looks like even the moderators don't read the article before assuming they know what it's talking about.

      The article isn't extremely specific but it says that there are requirements that teach the scout about copyright laws and requires them to visit a studio or something like that. It's not about passively not doing anything.

      come on moderators! wake up or log off!

    14. Re:As I understand them, by DannyO152 · · Score: 1

      Does the *AA get to use the public service announcements without compensating the writers?

    15. Re:As I understand them, by Jalestra · · Score: 1

      i love you....

      --
      I'll be enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it
  13. A merit badge for _not_ doing something? by Chairboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Traditionally, haven't merit badges been tied to specific, measurable actions? Knots? Prove it by tying 'em. Fire? Prove it by burnination.

    A merit badge for _not pirating_ is like not-tea in the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

    1. Re:A merit badge for _not_ doing something? by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 1
      > A merit badge for _not_doing something?

      Seriously, did you close your eyes when you clicked the link, assuming you took that bold step?

      "Scouts will be instructed in the basics of copyright law and learn how to identify five types of copyrighted works and three ways copyrighted materials may be stolen.

      Scouts also must choose one activity from a list that includes visiting a movie studio to see how many people can be harmed by film piracy. They also can create public service announcements urging others not to steal movies or music."

      There are so many things that is wrong with the BSA's decision, and you picked one that isn't even legitimate? Where does it say in there the requirement is "to keep a log of their online activies that show that they never downloaded any movie or music"?

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
    2. Re:A merit badge for _not_ doing something? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      RTFA....this is not a award from the BSA. It's only in the LA Council. Now I don't know if this is council driven AND BSA Approved or only council driven. The article says that this is the LA Area Council that is involved.

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:A merit badge for _not_ doing something? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      A merit badge for _not pirating_

      I've never been in a Turkish prison. Where's my merit badge?

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  14. Un-badge. by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I get a merit badge for not being a boy scout?

    -Grey

    1. Re:Un-badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      become a congressional page?

    2. Re:Un-badge. by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Why dont they let congresspeople in the library of congress?

      They keep leaving the pages bent over.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:Un-badge. by SamSim · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but you can get one for merit badge forgery, and that opens up all kinds of doors.

    4. Re:Un-badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh Oohh! What about one for not being GAY!!!!

  15. I'm an eagle scout by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think this is very inane.

    1. Re:I'm an eagle scout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're a little bit of a nutter, aren't you?

    2. Re:I'm an eagle scout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given the link in your sig, I'd say you're quite the expert on inanity.

    3. Re:I'm an eagle scout by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1
      Same here - Class of '89.

      To expand on CrazyJim1's thesis:

      Scouting is built on fundamental principles, enumerated in the Scout Law and the Scout Oath (at least as they were 20 years ago):
      Law: A Scout is Trustworthly, Loyal, Helpful, Friendly, Courteous, Kind, Obedient, Cheerful, Thrifty, Brave, Clean and Reverent.

      Oath: On my honor, I will do my best to do my duty to my God and my Country, and to obey the Scout Law; to help other people at all times, to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight.
      (IIRC, and all that). But the point is that Scout behaviours are governed by these fundamental principles, just as a US Law is based on its constitutionality.

      You can't illegally copy music and live by these principles. You're violating social contracts and depriving folks of income they are entitled to per that social contract. Now, part of it is staying "mentally awake", that is challenging what others say and not blindly accepting the status quo. This might lead some to decide, for instance, that it's OK to copy music that's out of print, etc. Or it might lead one to decide that it's better to support bands that function according to a preferred social contract (Leftover Salmon, The Dead, Jack Johnson, etc.), but it's not Scouting to unabashedly flaunt laws and stiff folks for convenience or monetary greed.

      So, basically this patch's implied message is "our Scouts wouldn't ordinarily behave appropriately but we've certified that in this particular case they will." It's too domain-specific; if copyright infringement among LA-county Scouts is a problem they need to get back to the fundamentals, not dress up in RIAA colors.

      Or as CrazyJim1 put it, more succinctly, "this is very insane". Perhaps National needs to have a look at what's going on at the LA council.
      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:I'm an eagle scout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am too, and I agree with you.

    5. Re:I'm an eagle scout by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And how about when something is legal and moral (copying "It's a wonderful Life") and then some big corporation comes in and makes it illegal?

      How about a song that's legal to copy-- but the same song sold in a "reissued collection" has a new copyright so it is not legal to copy?

      This really applies to old cartoons big time. They are legal via certain paths- but not via other paths. in some of them, the music is legal and then when they are *reissued* the cartoon studio purposely re-records the EXACT same music and lays it back over the cartoon so now it has modern copyrights which will extend another 50 years?

      How can you be morally upright and true when you are dealing with incredibly scummy people who bribe congressmen and corrupt government?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:I'm an eagle scout by EaglemanBSA · · Score: 1

      I'm an Eagle Scout as well, and I agree...it's sad that so many have been disaffected by the politics the BSA has encountered in the past few years. It really is an effective program for young men to participate in and learn honest-to-goodness leadership and outdoors skills. If you've any doubts, I'd love to explain my life story to you.

      --
      Quiz: True or False -- On a scale of 1 to 10, what is your middle name?
    7. Re:I'm an eagle scout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoopty-fuckin'-do for you.

    8. Re:I'm an eagle scout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought BSA was a great thing, but they have officially stated in court that discrimination against gays is a fundamental part of being a scout. The sooner the BSA dies, the quicker something more honorable can take its place.

    9. Re:I'm an eagle scout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to explain my life story to you.

            do I get a patch for NOT listening?

    10. Re:I'm an eagle scout by swillden · · Score: 1

      You can't illegally copy music and live by these principles.

      Are you sure about that? Ripping your CDs to play on your iPod is illegal according to the letter of the law, but does it really violate the principles of scouting?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  16. Merit _Patch_? by gauauu · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article is a little short on details. In Boy Scouts, the official things you work towards are Merit Badges, which are determined by the National Boy Scouts of America organization. The L.A. council/district/whatever doesn't, as far as I know, have the authority to create a new Merit Badge.

    What this article makes it sound like is that it's just a patch. Anybody and their uncle can make up a patch and make up their own requirements for it. We had patches made for activities only our troop would do. It sounds like this is just one of those, which if so, is no reason for anyone to get worked up about it. Sure, they're trying to brainwash Scouts, but there's nothing official or magical about it.

    1. Re:Merit _Patch_? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Its also nothing new.

      I was a scout for about 3 weeks... and that was about 8-10 years before that kid who was the center of some controversy for not allowing him in because he didn't believe in god and wouldn't say the oath.

      I thought it was amusing because I was an atheist when I joined, and seem to remember having mentioned similar reservations to my scout master, who didn't seem to feel the need to make a big deal about it. Of course, between that incident and the not allowing gay scouts controversies, I have pretty much lost most of the respect that I had for the organization.

      Far too pro-nationalist for my taste anyway. Though I was young enough when I joined that I didn't even have a concept of what that meant :)

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:Merit _Patch_? by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bingo. I'm an Eagle Scout myself (yeah, there are plenty of us) and most people don't realize that there are all kinds of non-sanctioned "patches" that really mean almost nothing besides the fact that you participated in something.

      True merit badges are standardized. They're very much like elective courses in school... you can pick when you want to 'take' a merit badge, but everyone has a standard set of requirements to complete before you get the badge. You also have to take the badge from an authorized instructor. They're obviously not difficult, but some have some significant physical and time-intensive requirements to be done.

      They're like mini-classes for real life. If you have a kid in the 10-15 year old range, even with no interest in Scouting, I'd recommend the merit badge books as a good "quick study" intro course to something new.

      That being said, here is a list of merit badges that are standardized, and the year they were introduced.

      Scouts on the local level have all kinds of extra meaningless crap. It's like getting the volunteer award at college. Cute, but doesn't count towards graduation.

      --
      "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    3. Re:Merit _Patch_? by N7DR · · Score: 1

      In fact, the article quite clearly states that this is a patch, not a badge.

    4. Re:Merit _Patch_? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      So, can I make a patch for molesting boys or stealing cars?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  17. Modern-day Hitler Youth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Corporate fascism über alles.

  18. Crappy journalism. by laxcat · · Score: 1

    What's the name of the merit badge?! It doesn't even say, so far as I can tell... Is it really a merit badge or a merit "patch?"

  19. Feedback by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Putting the fair use argument aside for a moment, who thinks it's a good idea to reward people for what they should be doing anyway. Should I expect to be rewarded because I didn't shoplift today or commit murder?

    -Grey

    1. Re:Feedback by kippers · · Score: 1

      Reward me or the teddy gets it!

    2. Re:Feedback by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      >Putting the fair use argument aside for a moment, who thinks it's a good idea to reward people for what they should be doing anyway. Should I expect to be rewarded because I didn't shoplift today or commit murder?

      Overrated much? I can't think of one merit badge, including whatever wording that they will place on this one, that says "You will earn this merit badge if you do NOT do something." The badge requirements will be to learn about something, just like many of the other badge requirements are. Whether or not you like what they're learning about (you know, the law) is up to you. And I don't mean whether you like the ideas, I mean the actual discussion and teaching is done by parents, who are the counselors.

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
    3. Re:Feedback by wsherman · · Score: 1

      ...who thinks it's a good idea to reward people for what they should be doing anyway.

      I suppose it's partially about efficiency. It takes less resources to punish the few people who commit crimes than it would take to reward everyone one else who doesn't. We also see the other side of this with something like the Nobel prize. It's more efficient to provide a substantial reward to the few people who make major scientific contributions than it is to provide a substantial punishment to everyone else who doesn't.

      This idea, that the decision of whether to reward of punish depends on the relative frequency of desired and undesired behavior, runs into an interesting question when it comes to work. Are people rewarded for working (with a salary) or are they punished for not working (you don't work, you don't eat - or at least you don't get to own a fancy car)?

  20. The next badge by DomesticatedOnion · · Score: 1

    is Genuine Windows Advantage badge. The scounts should keep a log of updating all patches M$ issues over a period of three months (at the rate of 50/week this is no small task). Should indulge in door-to-door anti-OSS campaign, so forth.

    Seriously, will someone come up with public interest litigation against the Boy Scouts morons.

  21. Do a good turn daily... by curecollector · · Score: 1

    No word yet on if that includes helping the MPAA file lawsuits against 80 year old grandmothers.

    ...or merely helping 80-year-old defendants cross the street, en route to the courthouse.

  22. Swift action needed by digitalamish · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need to get a Pirate Badge ASAP. Given the choice is some kid going to want to "perform a market study of the impact of copyright infringement on the entertainment industry", or learn how to keelhaul properly?

    Avast!

    1. Re:Swift action needed by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ahoy matey! My musings exactly! Here's be a badge that be given to scouts for helpin' shootin' down big media that be suin' li'l girls and grannies by learnin' the ways of pirates.

      Them know how to tie knots pretty good, so learnin' them to hoist a mast an' fire a cannon nary be hard at all.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  23. Another Badge by FrankDrebin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps they should also have a badge for not IM'ing your congressman.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
    1. Re:Another Badge by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps they should also have a badge for not IM'ing your congressman."

      Not yet, but it seems there is one for exchanging sexually explicit emails with your congresscritter!

      http://www.senate.gov/reference/reference_index_su bjects/Pages_vrd.htm

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
  24. Dangit! by Robot+Randy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I KNEW I shouldn't have started slam dancing in the server room!

  25. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...can you say brainwash?

  26. How about they teach the scouts the real stuff by TheWoozle · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about they create a "Hollywood Accounting" Merit Badge? The scouts can pursue activities like Screwing People Out of Money and Establishing a Distribution Monopoly? Or the "Hollywood Agent" Merit Badge; they can learn about Being A Money-Grubbing, Bloodsucking Parasite?

    --
    Insisting on "correct" English is like saying that there is only one, definitive recipe for chili.
    1. Re:How about they teach the scouts the real stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with those "Hollywood" badges are that they would involve learning to interact with Producers and I believe that the BSA has an explicit policy against boy scouts sucking cock.

  27. Not exactly a dup by imess · · Score: 1
  28. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get the idea more and more that the boy scouts is right wing propaganda. You recite the plege of allegance, THE BOY SCOUTS DOESN'T ALLOW GAY "TROOP LEADERS" (OR WHATEVER THEYRE CALLED) and now this bull! Piracy doesn't hurt everyone making a movie, every argument against piracy is bull. Before medias like CD's, casettes, A-tracks and records, artists did fine, there income came mostly from performing. In fact, I imagine many artists were against the idea of recording music becuase they thought people wouldn't need to pay to see them play. Also, the film industry came whining to the government when the VCR was invented saying it would ruin them, the same way they are whining about piracy. I'm happy America's youth is being INFECTED with this FILTH!

  29. Not filing... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    But a little questioning when they are helped into the middle of a busy intersection should crak quite a few of those wiley old folk into revealing all.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. ftfa by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The patch shows a film reel, a music CD and the international copyright symbol, a "C" enclosed in a circle. The movie industry has developed the curriculum.

    Shouldn't the boy scouts decide what their badges are? This is like McD's making the health curriculum for a school.

    -Grey

  31. I need one of those by computational+super · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to get one of those merit badges for my son, but they cost too much. Does anybody know somewhere I can download one from?

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    1. Re:I need one of those by velcrosmom · · Score: 1

      I found a bootleg copy of one on Ebay.

    2. Re:I need one of those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. Troops get badges free.

    3. Re:I need one of those by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Someone is going to make A LOT of money from these things. They are so deliciously ironic! The Emo crowd will love them!

  32. It will when I teach it by swillden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article isn't clear if this is a regular BSA badge or just something cooked up by the local council, but if it's official, I'm going to sign up to be a merit badge counselor (I'm already a counselor for a dozen other merit badges).

    My version will focus on understanding all of copyright law, including (especially) Fair Use, the Doctrine of First Sale and the historical and constitutional basis of copyright law.. I think I'll substitute the "Make a Public Service Announcement" for a 200-word essay on Why the Digital Consumer's Bill of Rights is a good idea".

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:It will when I teach it by pyser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think I'll substitute the "Make a Public Service Announcement" for a 200-word essay on Why the Digital Consumer's Bill of Rights is a good idea"

      Since you are already a MBC, you understand that you may not add to, delete or change the requirements. If the requirement were to say "Make a public service announcement", that's exactly what the candidate should do, not write an essay. How you go about it is between the MBC and the scout, but one requirement cannot be substituted for another unless it is specifically allowed.

    2. Re:It will when I teach it by aethera · · Score: 1
      As a former MBC (taught some two dozen or so at one time) and another Eagle Scout who refuses to support the BSA I can tell you that there is a lot of room to play with the make, add, alter clause. Most requirement are intentionally vague, and so many of them have options (do all of 7a and two of 7b,c,d,e,fg.....) that a merit badge mostly consists of what a counselour is willing to sign off on.

      Speaking of which, does anyone know if they still use blue cards? I worked at a camp and would occasionally have 30 or more students in each of 3 Environmental Sciences classes, plus generally 4 or five other badges I offered that week (Env Sci. did take two weeks, 1 hour each day plus your oberservations). At the end of the week I'd have a stack of two hundred of these things that all needed to be completed sometime after the Friday night campfire (last chance to turn in your observations and essay) and before the busses left Saturday morning. The completed badges weren't to bad. Make sure all the info was correct, sign in three places, but partial took five minutes apiece indicating what parts were completed and what remained.

      I was lucky to be working for a High Adventure Camp, and while we did award huge numbers of badges just based on having 600 kids a week, we were adamant about not being a "merit badge factory", so I gave out partials all the time. Our focus was on the good stuff. On a good week I'd be integrating plant and tree identification with rappelling lessons, wilderness survival and wilderness medicine, 25 miles of hiking, 20 or so on mountain bikes, 10 or fifteen in a canoe, all with a seamless monologue of modern and historical forestry practices, old sea shanties, knot and ropework, glacial geology, ecology, you name it. We had our stuff polished to perfection, more performance than lecture. If it wasn't for the living 4 months in a canvas tent with no bug mesh and only earning $800 total for the summer I'd go back to those days in a heartbeat, heck, I'd even take the tent!

    3. Re:It will when I teach it by pyser · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, does anyone know if they still use blue cards?

      Yes they do. In this electronic age it's still the only way to have a portable, hard copy, universally-readable record of a scout's merit badge work. Even with electronic popcorn ordering, advancement filing and rechartering, blue cards are probably here to stay, or at least for a very long time.

      At the end of the week I'd have a stack of two hundred of these things that all needed to be completed sometime after the Friday night campfire

      Still a major bottleneck at summer camp. That's probably why our camp sets Friday aside with little or no MB work, so the counselors can finish up the paperwork. You are right about partials. I always like when a boy can finish everything up "in one sitting", hard to do with many badges, or at least do so with one counselor. Keeping track of which items got a partial is a lot more record keeping than just writing "all requirements completed".

      we were adamant about not being a "merit badge factory", so I gave out partials all the time.

      I agree. While it's sometimes convenient to take certain merit badges at camp, there are some that just should not be able to be completed there, such as Citizenship in the Nation. Still, many of our boys earned that one at camp the year before last. (How in the world can you write a letter to your congressman and report on the response received while at camp? I suppose via e-mail, but how many camps have Internet access other than maybe one computer on a dial-up?) I'm not sure I agree that the requirements were fulfilled, but they have the blue cards to prove that they were.

  33. I concur and remember one patch... by Chagatai · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In the 1980s, I remember seeing in Boys Life magazine, the publication for Boy Scouts, that they were offering a "Donor Awareness" patch that would go on the chest pocket of the uniform, which is the spot usually reserved for various summer camp logos or other incidental merits. This patch required the scout having a conversation with his parents, and then sending in a form that said something along the lines of, "I have talked with Mommy and Daddy about who will get my kidneys when I die," plus shipping and handling. The badge looked pretty fruity overall, too. I imagine that this is what the "Anti-Piracy" patch would replace. Both merit badges and belt loops (remember those?) had sets of goals that had to be attained across several disciplines. This sounds like a one-step patch, and not a badge.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:I concur and remember one patch... by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those belt loops were called "Skill Awards." For those who weren't in Boy Scouts, skill awards are sort of lesser versions of merit badges and they are required for the lower ranks. Merit badges are much more involved. I suspect you're right, the article probably has it wrong and the anti-piracy thing isn't really a merit badge at all.

    2. Re:I concur and remember one patch... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      This patch required the scout having a conversation with his parents, and then sending in a form that said something along the lines of, "I have talked with Mommy and Daddy about who will get my kidneys when I die," plus shipping and handling.

      The moment that my boy comes back with a badge quest like that is the moment I actually come down like the wrath of God on my wife and forbid my boy from ever attending boy scouts again. I never wanted my kid to go into that organization and its the little things like that hit all my buttons. My wife has been brain washing my kids by taking them to her church. It's been working. She insisted our girl be in girl scouts and our boy be in boy scouts just like she and her brother were. I disliked getting applications for a private organization that clashed with my personal beliefs in publics school from K-5 grade. Having both sets of scouts interrupt my family life for all those "petty" actives really annoys me. The social good works and being a good citizen thing are just PR flak. Sort of like the honor and obey your parents seem to be to them as well. Next will be sports. I'm not looking forward to that one.

    3. Re:I concur and remember one patch... by ilctoh · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you're right - I'm an Eagle Scout, have been involved with Scouting for too long, and used to work for a Boy Scout Council, so I have some clue as to what I'm talking about. The article doesn't mention anything about a new merit badge, which are official, nationally recognized awards for merit in specific areas (eg, first aid, canoeing, computers, electronics, etc.) The article refers to a merit patch which doesn't actually exist - probably just a term whichn the reporter incorrectly associated with the Boy Scouts (like, when a person only marginally familiar with computers claims that the "Internet crashed" when IE segfaults). So, from what I can tell, this is probably a program developed from within the local council - not a national award, and not something that Boy Scouts can be required to earn. FYI - Donor Awareness is still around, is a national program, and Scouts can still participate - but, its not a "Merit Badge" - just an extra, optional award that interested scouts can persue.

      --
      How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
    4. Re:I concur and remember one patch... by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      wow. it's a fleur de lis with a rainbow trail. seriously. rainbows and the french. you weren't kidding...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  34. Right up there... by posterlogo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...with th de facto homophobia badge they're forced to wear.

    1. Re:Right up there... by rhaig · · Score: 1

      You're referring to National BSA policy. There is no homophobia badge or anti-gay curriculum tought by the BSA.

      --
      "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
    2. Re:Right up there... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Hey, you can't blame the Scouts. All they want to do is preserve their core activities: hanging out in all-male groups, dressing up in matching outfits, doing arts & crafts and being rewarded with jewelry. Gays just aren't cut out for that stuff.

      rj

    3. Re:Right up there... by ilctoh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just to shed some light on this issue: The BSA does not allow homosexuals to be adult leaders in their organization. However, this issue is seriously debated among the volunteer leadership of the BSA - in my experience, the majority don't care either way, with smaller groups strongly for or against this ruling. The problem is that rules such as this are set at the national level by a "Board of Directors" type group - people from business, religion, etc who likely have a very limited idea of what Scouting actually is (hint: the sexual orientation of the leadership never seems to really play a role). The dues-paying volunteer leaders, on the other hand, have no voice in any kind of decision such as this. In my mind, this is the biggest problem with the BSA - I'm a card-carrying, dues-paying member, but have absolutely no input in national policy. Really, the Boy Scouts could be such a valuable program (I believe this enough to continue volunteering in the organization), but there's some things that just make those of us that actually *do* Scouting grind our teeth.

      --
      How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
    4. Re:Right up there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant :)

      I will steal that joke for future use ;)

    5. Re:Right up there... by posterlogo · · Score: 1

      Ya know, I was going for funny... not really intending to seriously offend any boy scouts. Its enlightening to hear that the national BSA policy is not representative of all boy scouts.

  35. It is not piracy by zomper514 · · Score: 0

    I thought Piracy was when you took over a ship on the open seas, should we be talking about copyright infringement?

  36. Boy Scout Billy goes to the studio by russotto · · Score: 5, Funny
    Scouts also must choose one activity from a list that includes visiting a movie studio to see how many people can be harmed by film piracy. So Billy the Boy Scout takes the tour of the movie studio. While he's there, he sees several groups of people. First it's carpenters, putting together a set.

    "Are THOSE the people hurt by piracy?"

    "Oh, no, Billy, the carpenters are paid whether the film sells or not. They aren't the ones hurt by piracy".

    Later they see some writers, smoking cigarettes and muttering under their breath. "Are those the people hurt by piracy"

    "Oh, no, Billy. It's kind of complicated, but we actually don't pay them no matter how well the movie does. It's called 'accounting'"

    Then they pass a group of actors. "How about them, are THEY hurt by piracy?"

    "Oh, no, Billy, they get paid even if the movie flops, no matter how many people pirate it. They're supposed to get extra if it does well, but, well, there's that 'accounting' again"

    Billy then points to a director, sitting in a chair. "Is HE the one hurt by piracy"

    "Well, you're getting a little closer. He's a little better at 'accounting'. But piracy really doesn't hurt him all that much either"

    "Then who IS seriously hurt by piracy?"

    "Well, Billy, it's not normally a part of the tour, but just for you, we'll make a special trip."

    So Billy and the tour guide go to the studio offices. Up, up they go to the very top floor. The guide takes Billy to a large office with a door. "Billy, if you stand right here and look through the door, do you see the man there"

    "Yes"

    "That's one of the vice presidents of the studio. Thanks to piracy, he could only buy 3 Porsches last year instead of 5, and had to cut his cocaine habit in half. He can now only maintain one mistress, and she's in her LATE 20s. This studio alone has 30 executives, and they're all similarly suffering. And THAT'S who is hurt by piracy. NOW do you understand why you mustn't pirate movies?"

    "Loud and clear," said Billy, "Loud and clear". Billy then went home, told his parents he was quitting the Scouts, and asked if they could get a faster Internet connection

    1. Re:Boy Scout Billy goes to the studio by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Loud and clear," said Billy, "Loud and clear". Billy then went home, told his parents he was quitting the Scouts, and will be going for his MBA after high school.
      "Forget all this camping crap, I want 3 Porches and a mistress!"

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    2. Re:Boy Scout Billy goes to the studio by redkazuo · · Score: 1

      Wait, I'm also all for movie studio and corporate bashing, however, pirate fanboyism isn't the answer either. The parent can't be insightful, because whenever any industry declines, it takes a lot of people with it. See the automobile industry, the 1929 crash, etc.

      It could be said that the special effects dept isn't important and that would make all movies more content focused, but you can't deny that dept will suffer, as will other non-essential depts.

      ...
      oh my, is it even thinkable the american movie industry is not truly viable?

    3. Re:Boy Scout Billy goes to the studio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this isnt funny its just childish bullshit.
      You think every product that gets pirated online is made by huge megacorps that still pay everyones wages regardless of ticket sales?
      you think every movie / game / tv show is made by the super rich?

      get a fucking clue.

    4. Re:Boy Scout Billy goes to the studio by LinuxIsRetarded · · Score: 0

      What a lame and ignorant post. What about the lack of turnout at movie theaters? What about the poor DVD rentals and sales? Do movie theaters not employ people? Do movie rental and sales shops not employ people? Unless piracy is actively prosecuted and treated equally as other theft, it will eventually have an incredibly damaging effect on the movie industry, the music industry, and (more personally to me) the software industry.

      Consider this: I am confident that a few gallons of milk stolen from the local supermarket won't have an overwhelmingly negative effect on the employees and suppliers of that supermarket. If, however, retail theft is not prosecuted, what's to stop everyone from stealing all the gallons of milk all the time? Why should anyone pay for something that can be obtained for free? That's when the economic impact of the theft is severe.

      Face it- whether you like it or not, piracy is theft, just like any other theft. It's wrong from a moral standpoint, and it has negative economic impacts. Make it more personal to yourself- if everyone refused to pay for the burger you served them, you'd be out of a job.

    5. Re:Boy Scout Billy goes to the studio by russotto · · Score: 1

      You know, I tried to take your post seriously, but it's just impossible to take seriously someone whose home page is a domain squatting page.

    6. Re:Boy Scout Billy goes to the studio by LinuxIsRetarded · · Score: 0

      What a shame.

  37. Coming from an Eagle scout. by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is f'ing BS. They're making a merit badge for doing PR work for an industry that is completely incompetant at doing thier own PR work.

    It's bad enough that MS hijacked the acronym "BSA".

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
  38. Without Merit by SmilingMarsupial · · Score: 1

    Is this a badge that everyone that is granted to everyone and a few scouts have revoked? I'd like a badge for not committing arson today!

  39. I promise to conform... by Ueltzheimers · · Score: 1

    What about the Girl Guides!? All the cool kids at school are going to be getting this mean looking badge and the girl guides are just left in the dust. Shame on the MPAA. Anyone have a link with an actual picture of the badge...would make a good shirt ;).

  40. ahahahaha by the_last_rites · · Score: 0

    roflmao I swear that was my reaction when i read TFA

    --
    Select SigText from Signatures where Len(SigText) > 120 Order By Len(SigText) desc
  41. Three ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    three ways copyrighted materials may be stolen.

    First there's your basic shoplifting.

    Second there's the classic breaking and entering.

    The third way is a little tricky. You have to forcibly board a boat and seize their copyrighted materials at swordpoint.

    Bonus points for recognising which one involves piracy.
    1. Re:Three ways by burndive · · Score: 1

      You can steal the boat itself: hull designs are covered by copyright.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    2. Re:Three ways by modecx · · Score: 1

      You can steal the boat itself: hull designs are covered by copyright.

      Arrr! RIAAHAHAHA!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    3. Re:Three ways by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      copyrights? or patents?

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  42. Listen to the death throws of a dieing giant. by ralph1 · · Score: 0

    Remember when an LP was 5.99

  43. Stolen...? by WickedLogic · · Score: 1

    "Scouts will be instructed in the basics of copyright law and learn how to identify five types of copyrighted works and three ways copyrighted materials may be stolen." -TA

    Stolen...? they mean infringed... does that make me an enemy combatant?

  44. As an Eagle Scout... by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is pretty absurd. No doubt I have a new reason to write to the BSA.

    Luckily, the people that make these decisions are not the people that are leading individual troops. My Assistant Scoutmaster was a liberal radio columnist, far from the socialist "join the army" stereotype portrayed by some, and my actual Scoutmaster was often heard saying "I don't care what the requirements say". He'd rather the kids learn the material than blindly worship the step-by-step process if it meant skipping the crap so as to learn the meaty stuff. Of the three weekends spent doing the Computers merit badge, we might of discussed the "Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?" requirement for a total of three minutes.

    I'm strongly going to urge any sons I have in the future to join scouting, not only because it's where I met some of my best friends and was my first chance at taking a leadership position, but because it was just plain fun. However, I will also be the parent that attends the meeting, make sure that I agree with the way it's being run, and if not check out another troop. There are plenty around that one will "do it right", by my standards, and not by the book.

    --
    CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
  45. Me too by jimlintott · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have one of those badges.

    I downloaded it.

    1. Re:Me too by Xyrus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Torrent?

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
  46. merit badges by bobbonomo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Que? Slashdot. News for nerds. Stuff that matters. This story does not match on both counts and neither do most of the responses to it. C'mon guys. NEWS for nerds. STUFF that matters.

  47. Looks like a local thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're calling it a "merit patch", not a "merit badge", and they say it's only available to Scouts in the LA area. Nothing about it from the national BSA (www.scouting.org).

    Not enough stuff to actually *do* for this to be a real merit badge, according to the traditional definition. Seems like something that would be discussed under some other merit badge (in fact, copyright is already discussed to some extent in one requirement of the Computers merit badge.)

  48. Who wants to take bets by rm999 · · Score: 1

    on how many boy scouts use pirated versions of photoshop or illustrator to make posters to earn their merit badge?

  49. My mother used to tell me... by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My mother used to say (and I suspect many did) that if I put half the effort of getting out of doing something into getting it done, I'd be done with it. I think the MPAA needs to listen to moms everywhere and put some energy into creating a business model that actually works with the changing times, not against it.

  50. Badges, Patches, Patch Tuesday? by norminator · · Score: 1

    is Genuine Windows Advantage badge. The scounts should keep a log of updating all patches M$ issues over a period of three months (at the rate of 50/week this is no small task). Should indulge in door-to-door anti-OSS campaign, so forth.

    You can earn a new patch the 2nd Tuesday of every month!

  51. Ok this is just wrong by billsoxs · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is not standard BSA. FYI: BSA webpage is http://www.scouting.org./ You will not find this 'merit badge' there. In fact, it does not seem to fit into what BSA is trying to do.

    Also for the comment about a merit badge for 'learning how to think'. That is really the whole point of scouting - to give young men the skills they need for adulthood, including thinking.

    --
    This message was brought to you by "Lack of Sleep."
    1. Re:Ok this is just wrong by Deoxyribose · · Score: 1

      Hold on there, as I understand it the scouts require belief in God and have a strong pro-nationalistic bent to them. I believe that these two topics are those that often require the most critical thinking applied to them, and an organization that promotes complete acceptance of these concepts certainily does not teach "thinking", at least not in a complete, critical, and analytical way. Note here that I am not saying that you have to be atheist/antinationalist to be a good critical thinker, just that you have to think about these issues before accepting a viewpoint. Promoting a one-sided view of any political, religious or corporate (such as the RIAA/MPAA) idea is never the way to teach thinking. Anyone with more personal experience with the BSA organization is welcome to refute me, in case I'm severely out of touch or something.

    2. Re:Ok this is just wrong by billsoxs · · Score: 1
      Hold on there, as I understand it the scouts require belief in God and have a strong pro-nationalistic bent to them.

      Belief in god - yes - but not in a particular religion. In fact there are religous MBs so that an individual scout can learn more about his religion. To me this is a case of looking at your beliefs in a reasonably well thought out manner. Also Buddhist are in Scouts.... look at the BSA website. An example:

      Overview

      Scouting serves an important role in youth development in the Buddhist community. Cub Scout packs, Boy Scout troops, Varsity Scout teams, and Venturing crews chartered to Buddhist organizations can be found throughout the United States. Scouts can participate within units chartered to Buddhist organizations or as members of units chartered to other organizations.

      Buddhist youth have participated in Scouting for more than 80 years. Since 1920, with the formation of Troop 4 by the Fresno Buddhist Church, young Buddhists in America have enjoyed the benefits of Scouting.

      In reality this part - belief in god - is only questioned when a scout becomes an Eagle.... although I not sure how this is handled in the buddhist 'churchs'. (As I understand, Buddhist don't believe in god.)

      Pro-nationalistic? I don't think that this really fits. (Pride in your country - yes.) There are Scout orginizations in many countries (including place like Iraq). The places that scouting does not exist are typically totalitarian regimes - the places where you really have to follow what you are told to do. For example Iraq under Saddam H. In BSA you have to go to city council meetings (or similar) so that you know how the government works. Also to get the Rank '1st Class you need to talk to someone about your 'rights and responsiblities ' under the US Constitution. To me this is not really pro-nationalistic, it is more learning how to be an active citizen - and maybe taking part in what goes on. There is a reason that there are a lot of Eagle Scouts in places of leadership.

      (Consider yourself partly refuted.)

      --
      This message was brought to you by "Lack of Sleep."
  52. Re:lol slow news day? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    Only in a county like the US can we have...a foreing president jealous of a rapist

    Er...wait, how is it the US's fault that Putin said that? Isn't that taking US-bashing just a weeee bit too far?

  53. As an ex-boy scout... by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this is awesome, because the only thing better than getting a badge for doing something is getting a badge for not doing something.

    Here's hoping for an anti-axe-wielding badge, an anti-tripping-old-ladies badge, and perhaps an anti-cynicism badge -- oops, I guess I don't qualify for that last one.

  54. Here is a list of Merit Badges by NutMan · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article is inaccurate. A Council (local office) of the BSA cannot create their own Merit Badge. This is some local program to educate the Scouts, but whatever award they earn is not "official", and would not help them earn a rank advancement or anything like that.

    Here is a list of the current Merit Badges, along with the requirements to earn each one.

    If you are so inclined, consider volunteering at your local Council as a "Merit Badge Counselor". If you have expertise in a particular area covered by a Merit Badge, you may be a counselor. A scout may not earn a badge unless a counselor verifies that the scout has completed all of the requirements. So if a scout cannot find a counselor for a particular badge, they have no way of earning it.

    For more information, see this training page, this guide and the application form.

  55. Illuminati by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

    This reminds me, in a sick twisted way, of the Illuminati card game by Steve Jackson Games.

    The MPAA attacks to control the Boy Spouts of America and succeeds...

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:Illuminati by mlush · · Score: 1
      This reminds me, in a sick twisted way, of the Illuminati card game by Steve Jackson Games.

      I was thinking exactly the same thought ... must be the Orbital Mindcontrol lasers.

  56. Re:ZONK EARNED THE "BUTT PIRATE" MERIT BADGE by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Olde Joke

    Q: Why was Michael Jackson kicked out of the Boy Scouts?

    A: He was going through a pack a day.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  57. Two for one? by JShadow21 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they sue the old lady they just helped across the street?

  58. Re:Not Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even ten years ago, only a few kids in my school were in Boy Scouts, and the rest of us just made fun of them. I'd be more worried about their crazy right-wing views if there were actually any Boy Scouts around anymore.


    Umm....just how long you been in school?

  59. Oh, God ... No! by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

    Please! As soon as I can find credible information about this, I'm going to start complaining to my council, BL, National Council, etc. They might be able to get away with making this a minor award, but making it a MB is just plain wrong. For starters, not many scout even know how to pirate music. I live in one of the geekiest areas of the nation, and only one other scout in my troop knows anything about computers beyond simple email and IMing. Traditionally, the merit badges fell into two categories: outdoor skills, such as backpacking and climbing, and career oriented badges that introduce boys to a new field. The only exceptions were the Eagle-required badges such as First Aid and the Citizenship badges. This new thing is way out of line.

    Scouting in America is way too Republican. Most of BSA's moral policies are fine, but this is way over the line. At risk of agreeing with a bunch of old farts and former Scoutmasters, I'll say that political correctness and excessive patriotism have really wrecked Scouting in recent years. It is now much harder to teach the things that really matter: leadership and citizenship. The new standards for suburban life prevent most kids from ever being put into situations where they are the decision-makers. Even the Eagle Scout award is rapidly becoming meaningless.

  60. Report someone to the RIAA merit badge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a separate badge for reporting someone to the RIAA?

  61. I'm an Eagle Scout. by j2crux · · Score: 1

    I'm an Eagle Scout, got it 99, and still carry the card around.

    I'm sorry but WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG HERE?
    My computer merit badge my old scouts taught me about usenet and irc!

    --
    j^2
  62. Mmmmm by PhaxMohdem · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to steal me some Anti-Piracy Popcorn :)

    --

    The Property of One's : "The Oneitude is directly proportional to the Colditude of the one." - S.B.

  63. ahhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the article before going crazy. This isn't a new merit badge. Merit badges take a long time to make, and are not made by random groups. This is a dumb patch the RIAA is offering to local scouts in there area. This does not mean BSA is the devil. it means the RIAA is trying to get at kids while they are young.

  64. Way to go Boy Scouts by McFortner · · Score: 1

    I for one am glad that the Hilter Youth ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Boy Scouts are fighting Americans excersing their rights ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H illegally downloading files. Michael

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
  65. From a Scout's perspective... by jbarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Scout oath states (emphasis added)...

            On my honor I will do my best
           
    To do my duty to God and my country
            and to obey the Scout Law;
            To help other people at all times;
            To keep myself physically strong,
            mentally awake, and
    morally straight

    So does this not imply a scout's obedience to governing laws, including copyright laws? Isn't providing this kind of merit badge redundant by simply reinforcing what the scout already promises? As I recall, the merit badges I earned for my Eagle Scout rank were meant to be skill-related...

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:From a Scout's perspective... by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 1

      I was going to make that same sort of point. At the same time, it's important to highlight that it doesn't mean you just blindly follow rules without protest. If you believe that the DMCA (for example) is unconstitutional, you should fight it. Of course, you fight within the system, in legal ways.

    2. Re:From a Scout's perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing your duty to your country may often mean going against laws that hurt it or its people.

      Morals are personal and are not dictated by a country.

    3. Re:From a Scout's perspective... by ThisIsNotMyHandel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This just makes me sick. The MPAA says they are losing billions of dollars. I call bull shit on that. People are still flocking to buy DVDs. People are still going to the theaters. Maybe if they made quality movies that are reasonably priced they would get more support. It is not as if they are losing billions of dollars. They are just making less billions of dollars if that makes since.

    4. Re:From a Scout's perspective... by oGMo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps; on the other hand, is it not the duty of an American to make sure his country remains free?

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    5. Re:From a Scout's perspective... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      So does this not imply a scout's obedience to governing laws, including copyright laws?

      No.
      Why?

      Because LAW != MORALITY

      If the gov't passed a law tomorrow that every foreign national residing in the US was to be hunted down and killed, would following it be the "moral" thing to do? Do you honestly believe that morality is defined by the decisions of a bunch of corrupt old white men?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  66. Slashdot editors... by Dobeln · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...in misleading summary shocker! Keep watching for the latest developments! Seriously, you almost had me with that Battlefield 2142 "spyware" thing the other day, but this time I was more vigilant. Muahahahah!

  67. WHO cares about scouts anyways ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Huh ?

    I get pretty annoyed if some kid wearing a uniform with a 100 year old design wanders around me.

  68. No agenda here by causality · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, there's no agenda here. Why, this is only being done to make each of them better, happier, and more productive citizens. As an Anonymous Coward said, this is a reiteration of Hitler Youth, much like the D.A.R.E. program.

    The D.A.R.E. program will never encourage children to consider whether it is just for a government of a "free country" to tell its citizens what they may or may not put into their own bodies (on the basis of regulating interstate trade, no less ... aren't those "implied powers" great?) -- if it were such an absurd thing to consider, then it could at least be mentioned and demonstrated as such. No, instead, D.A.R.E. is "taught" by armed, uniformed police officers instead of former drug addicts who have overcome an addiction and don't want someone else to go through the same ordeal, because former drug addicts would not be so interested in encouraging the children to help them police the parents and extended family. The basic idea here is that if your law requires police-state tactics to enforce, then your law is broken.

    Likewise, you can bet your ass that this program will never encourage children to evaluate for themselves whether the RIAA/MPAA are using the law to prop up an obsolete business model and whether or not these future voters should consider eliminating such corruption, which is what being a good citizen is all about. Rather, you can expect that this civil matter concerning arbitrary copyright and its infringement will be falsely elevated to the status of a moral question and will be taught in terms of right and wrong.

    In both situations the parents are reaping the rewards of ignoring their responsibility and depending on large organizations like the government education monopolists or the Boy Scouts to take care of the upbringing of their children. Not that it matters, really, since vast numbers of them love their children so much that they decided to allow themselves to become single parents and/or to allow their children to be born into poverty. I guess "free" education starts looking pretty good when you put no forethought into one of the most important decisions you can make.

    We badly need for a country that values independent thought, critical thinking, and minimal government to economically kick the asses of the rest of the world and demonstrate that these things are more than luxuries. Unfortunately I don't know of such a domain; a long time ago this was the USA, but oh how far we have fallen. Most of the rest of the world seems heavily invested in the groupthink bandwagon as well.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  69. What's the Big Deal Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Encouraging people to not steal copyrighted material is a good thing. As long as the badge information does not discourage fair use rights for content that an individual has paid for and does not paint file sharing software as good for nothing but pirating, then this is a great thing. File sharing software will then be accepted for content that can legally be traded. Scouts will also be honoring the part of the oath that states that they will keep themselves "morally straight."

    I thought /. was only concerned about the RIAA/MPAA trying to destroy fair use and legal use of file sharing software. The comments I am seeing seem to be advocating piracy.

  70. It normally takes 20 min to earn a badge ... by guysmilee · · Score: 1

    and this one should be pretty easy to earn on a camping trip!

  71. How about a merit badge for... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    ..."if and when I become a movie studio mogul I will not jump automatically to making a turgid plasticized sequel to, or remake of, previously successful movies."

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  72. I think you meant facist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When corporate interests trump social, democratic and government interests, fascism is established.

  73. I have never been prouder by noewun · · Score: 1

    to have been kicked out of the Scouts.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  74. what next? Securing border w/ Mexico Badge? by Lukasz+(Qr) · · Score: 3, Funny

    what next? Scout Badge for securing the border with Mexico? Send them to Arizona and ask to look for any signs of movement? Use your brain - think - it doesn't hurt!

    1. Re:what next? Securing border w/ Mexico Badge? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      Otherwise known as the 'sharp shooting' merit badge ;-)

      And yes, I am an Eagle Scout too.

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  75. Great, special interests and the boy scouts. by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, other special interests groups are going to start paying off the boy scouts to add more merit badges. Before long there's going to be the Christian Values merit badge and the NRA merit badge (yeah, I know they already have some shooting related ones).. Hell, and when they get really hard up for cash, there'll be the Porn Star merit badge and the Smoking merit badge.

    The boy scouts really is a shadow of its former self. I would never send my kids to the scouts these days. 25+ years ago, they were a decent organization, but they've really just gone to hell.

  76. One thing to point out by jedijoe9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    One thing to pay attention to is that this is NOT the Boy Scout of America, rather "Boy Scouts of Los Angeles" and that it is a "merit patch" instead of a merit badge. The Boy scouts have an official list of merit badges that have to go through a long process to become official, so this is nothing more than a Los Angeles based program to teach kids about piracy.

    The computers merit badge (which I earned while still in scouting) does have a discussion point that states "Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?" but that is it. The computers merit badge is highly outdated though, with something that looks akin to an Apple 2 on the badge

    1. Re:One thing to point out by CowsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Ugh, why did I waste my ability to mod parent up by arguing with all those taking cheap shots at the BSA. Hopefully a better person will come along...

      --
      CowsAnonymous: We're here to help moo.
  77. Trustworthiness by brian_cragun · · Score: 1

    C'mon people. Scouting still holds to the basic principle of honesty. This fits the Boy Scout law. This makes sense from a values point of view.

    It also makes sense from a financial point of view. Do YOU contribute to Scouting? Businesses do. Or at least they used to. This illustrates to businesses the law abiding business honesty that Scouting teaches.

    It makes sense from a legal standpoint. Nobody likes lawsuits. Teaching the Scouts to respect others intellectual property helps avoid potential lawsuits as well.

    I'm a card-carrying scouter. I'm not sure a Merit Badge is needed. But I agree with the principle.

  78. screw them by uberCHIEFTAIN! · · Score: 1

    when I get my eagle, I'm returning it, if they actually do make this as an official badge. it sounds like an award right now though.

    1. Re:screw them by uberCHIEFTAIN! · · Score: 1

      Here's the official press release from the MPAA http://www.mpaa.org/press_releases/boy%20scouts%20 press%20release.pdf/

  79. It California and its not a official badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this news? I mean it takes place in California the land of the nut jobs. New badges cannot be made by anyone the national BSA organization. Anyone can make a patch and say its for the boy scouts that doesn't mean it has anything to do with the boy scouts. I am saddened that /. would have this as news and even more saddened by the massive ammount of people taken in by something so stupid as this.

  80. More badges for *NOT* doing something by mmeister · · Score: 1

    Next on the agenda, Boy Scouts will be offering merit badges for *NOT* farting in someone's face and *NOT* peeing on the toilet seat.

  81. Conflicts with "CITIZENSHIP IN THE NATION" badge by openright · · Score: 1

    The "CITIZENSHIP IN THE NATION" merit badge by its nature suggests that the constitution is important.

    The new badge, by its nature, encourages blind support of the publishing monopolies without regard to the social purpose and limits places on publishing monopolies by the US constitution.

  82. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad to see a fine right-wing christians-only gay-discriminating organization such as this turn to the dark side.

  83. Perfectly in line with the Scout code by steve802 · · Score: 1

    I am a scout leader, and I want to be able to teach my boys that just because you can do a thing does not mean that you should do a thing. Do I think the RIAA and MPAA are Nazi-like and Stalinist in their tactics? Yes. Do I think they are on the right side of the issue? Yes. Should the BSA use the resources of the RIAA and/or MPAA to promote its mission? Maybe not - that's a debate scouts and scout leaders can have in their packs and dens (I'm a cub scout leader, so I'm not into troops yet). One of the basic tenets of scouting is honesty. How does promoting piracy, or at the very least not condemning piracy, jibe with this tenet? It cannot. If a scout is going to live up to the scout code, then pirating music and video is not something they should do, pure and simple. I would love to see a legal alternative to all of this. I would encourage scouts to borrow music and video from friends to try things out, download approved files, and pay for what they intend to keep. In fact, I would encourage anyone to do the same, scout or not.

    1. Re:Perfectly in line with the Scout code by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> How does promoting piracy, or at the very least not condemning piracy, jibe with this tenet? It cannot.

      One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

      Someone who breaks the DRM to copy their own legally purchased CD or DVD to their own MP3 player for their own use still falls foul of the RIAA/MPAA. Until that gets fixed, you shouldn't allow these coprorate agendas to be promoted under the guise of honesty good citzenship.

      You of all people are in a very important position where you are molding the future generations, and the kids you teach are very impressionable at that age.

      Please don't presume to teach and reward our kids that its right to be passively compliant consumers no matter what big bully corporations say and do, even if they do find contentious labels like 'pirate' to justify it.

  84. no pirates cant be good for pollution by mcguyver · · Score: 1
  85. roflmao o' copter by SuperStretch · · Score: 0

    As an eagle scout, I laugh at this. 99% of the scouts that I knew listened to burned cds on whatever campout we went on and watched divx format movies when they got home. Their xboxes were cracked, just like the other percent of the population that never wore the BSA uniform.

    The only difference is that we could weave baskets, hit a bullseye 50 ft away with a .22, live off of roots and berries in a leanto (ours was a 4 story log/tree mansion with a sauna, roof, and 30 ft fire. I'm telling the truth!)- all while being significantly un-cooler than our peers.

    Well who's laughing now? LOL

    --
    Help me get a new laptop - http://nocreditcard.yourgiftsfree.com/?id=3012
  86. I want to see the evidence. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    Succumbing to the moral dry-rot so rampant in contemporary America is something we have to eschew individually.

    What “moral dry-rot”? You people just cannot stop dreaming up one crisis after another, can you? It is nonsense to say that American society is becoming less moral. Crime is going down, racial and gender equality is and has been increasing, workers rights are protected, and on and on.

    Oh wait, do you mean we are descending into a moral abyss because people at large no longer feel guilty about engaging in perfectly natural sexual activities outside the definition and confines of marriage as endorsed by Christianity?

    1. Re:I want to see the evidence. by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Lets all forget about our "moral compasses" for one second and consider this. The apparent center of American culture is a lifestyle of violence, whorring, and drugs. I won't tell you what's the best way to live your life - but I can certainly see the worst way. Living this lifestyle only leads to a life of emptyness.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    2. Re:I want to see the evidence. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

      Our culture is a lifestyle of violence? The Department of Justice begs to differ. Crime is, as I said, declining steadily. Whoring? I assume you mean sexual prostitution. Provided those offering the service and those purchasing the service are consensual adults and their activities render no harm upon others, there is no problem. I agree that sex can be misused. For example, it is clearly immoral for a married man to use the services of a prostitute without the knowledge (and consent) of his wife, but because he is engaging in deception not because he is having sex. Drugs are immoral? Why? If a person chooses to use drugs, as long as they do so responsibly, there is no problem. As an aside, alcohol and nicotine are drugs, both of which may be abused with deleterious effects on the user and those around the user, and it is that harm caused which is immoral. When used properly—in moderation—they present no threat and the moral issue moot.

      Now if all of this amounts to an empty lifestyle, that is entirely up to the individual. We live in a free country where each person may choose to lead a trite existence or one replete with accomplishment. I suppose we could ask ourselves: is it immoral to lead a meaningless existence? I expect it is not, but that is a discussion for another time.

      Again, I would appreciate some concrete evidence or objective analysis. And I think there is a lot we could all learn about the nature of morality. You might come to the conclusion that I am a moral relativist (perhaps intended in a derogatory fashion). I assure you I am not. Just as science and mathematics present us with absolutes, morality provides a rigid framework that may be used to draw useful conclusions about proper behavior. Morality is easily modeled objectively, and it is logical how we do so, utilizing our sense of empathy and desire to maximize happiness. As such, we should evaluate human activities objectively and determine their quantifiable impacts when we go about identifying those actions as moral or immoral.

    3. Re:I want to see the evidence. by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      The number of crimes has decreased - but jails are fuller than ever. Over 2,000,000 people are in jail right now. Fifteen percent of black males will end up in jail. So I'm not exactly sure that the actual number of criminals has decreased. My main point though was the amount of explicity violent material has grown and it isn't the Lone Ranger anymore LOL.

      Prostitutes are rarely the "avant gard" self-employed we imagine. It's pure exploitation in most cases. Usually young women are forced into work to support habits, feed themselves or their family, or other desperate measures. I don't know if you have children - but would you advocate that your daughter or son work as a prostitute? Honestly? Most of them risk their lifes with AIDS and violent, drunk customers on an hourly basis. Some/many of them were sexually abused as children.

      More food for thought: "92% of women engaged in prostitution said they wanted to leave prostitution, but couldn't because they lack basic human services such as a home, job training, health care, counseling and treatment for drug or alcohol addiction."

      I am not the big moralist you imagine me to be. It's just common sense, a good knowledge of history, and personal experience that tells me that a society doesn't survive on empty rhetoric. It was a long held thesis that moral decay led to the death of a culture - perhaps there is merit there?

      I'm not against religious, athiests, nor moral relativists. I'm against the immoral, pure animals that have no reason or education. Most people don't understand that these activities and lifestyles put you at greater risks than normal.

      In the end it's a statistical numbers game, play all you like. Just know than if your the looser - it'll be more than a game.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    4. Re:I want to see the evidence. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Your first point is an excellent one--there is always a temptation to focus on the negative, or over-accentuate the positive, at the expense of a realistic view.
      Which leads into your second point, BTW. I dunno whom you mean by "people at large", or "perfectly natural" sexual activities. I do know what a realistic view of the equipment in question would suggest as "perfect" and "natural" uses, endorsed by such constituencies as Christianity. Also, I daresay, the overwhelming majority of cultures in all times and places. But hey, let's not just assert that (popularity == correct) here.
      How about we pursue a "separation of bedroom and state"? That way, people can no longer feel guilty (I, for one, see no value in guilt), in private about acts that others may find unspeakable.
      Voyeurism, as I see it, is symptomatic of the dry-rot that we'd be better off avoiding. Or, as in the Jane's Addiction song: "And the news is just another show with sex and violence." How you tastefully manage things without slipping into some puritanical/victorian reality-distortion is an exercise in good taste.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  87. Bought Off by V_Pundit · · Score: 1

    I'm all in favor of the Boy Scouts. Too bad they can be purchased by corporate interests.

    --
    that's how I see it anyway . . .
  88. BSA of LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that an oxymoron? Because we know that LA is a bastion of traditional values. OK, I have youthful friends who are in boy scouts, and they have nothing of the kind. Then again, they don't live in LA, the razor edge of culture. In fact, I'd say the Boy Scouts are pushing away from the movies/video games/TV addiction that consume and fatten our young people today. There are activities that build kids' social abilities, get them out more in the great outdoors, and show them responsibility and discipline. But I guess it's the thing to do to stereotype and denigrate the Boy Scouts, especially when you don't really know anyone who's a part of that right now.

  89. Better link by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is not standard BSA

    It's local to LA, about 52,000 scouts, according to the MPAA press release

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    1. Re:Better link by rhaig · · Score: 1

      the press release calls this a "respect copyrights patch". Not a merit badge. Not a merit patch. the word "merit" does not appear in the file at all. This is a local council produced patch.

      http://www.boyscoutsla.org/website/contact_us.htm is a list of people to call and/or email your complaints to about this patch.

      --
      "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
  90. WMD by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

    Then tere should be a badge for NOT BUILDING WMD. (Ywa, I am aware of Mr David Hahn. Atmoic energy != WMD.)

  91. Re:Not Surprising by rhaig · · Score: 1

    the BSA is not an arm of the Mormon church. Scouting is very much a part of a mormon boy's life, but that doesn't work the other way around.

    In our district, the numbers come out to 1 in 4 scouting age boys is a scout.

    --
    "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
  92. I thought Boy Scouts wore green shirts by antaeus · · Score: 1
    ... not brown.

    (If that's a little too obscure... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownshirt.)

  93. How to earn a Merit Badge with some actual merit by spamania · · Score: 1

    Instead of trying to get kids psyched up by promising to take them to a real-live movie studio in order to teach them about piracy, the Boy Scouts could have a Merit Badge where you actually made a short movie on DV and released for free on a page with Google Ad-words (or similar) on it.

    Issue a press release, draw some site traffic and teach kids that the copyright business model isn't the only one that can make money. Each scout could actually keep a percetage of the advertising revenue.

    --
    My other .sig is a troll.
  94. The actual curriculum by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's straight from the article. And more to the point, it's the exact doublespeak that the RIAA wants to drill into these kid's heads

    Indeed, the MPAA-developed "curriculum" begins :

    Intellectual Property is no different than physical property

    Intellectual dishonesty is no different than child abuse

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    1. Re:The actual curriculum by Rinkhals · · Score: 1

      Seriously?

      Intellectual Property is no different than physical property?

      Surely that should be from or to physical property

      *Than* implies that both are different but doesn't specify from what

      Fair enough, I'm sounding a bit like a grammar nazi here, but surely the MPAA should not be lapsing into this kind of sloppy communication in, what I assume are, official documents?

      Dear me! They've gone down a bit in my estimation!

      --
      "I'm a snake if we disagree"-Jethro Tull, Bungle in the Jungle
  95. MOD PARENT UP by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for posting this. It really helps me narrow down my protests to the guilty council.

  96. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you can get a merit badge for NOT doing something?!? I can't wait 'till the merit badge for not engaging in homosexual sex acts comes out! I wouldn' t have had any problem at all in getting that one! I'm sure this will be quickly followed by merit badges for abstinance, not smoking dope, not downloading free porn, not taking the lord's name in vain, not coveting thy neighbor's wife, nor his ass, nor his manservant, not posting to slashdot...

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn' t have had any problem at all in getting that one!

            The blowjob you gave me behind the gymn doesn't count, then?

  97. AACCKK, i am incompetent by hurfy · · Score: 1

    "I opened up the merit-badge book, and lo-and-behold, one of the requirements to obtain the merit badge was for scouts to be able to understand and give examples of piracy, whether it was burning CDs or P2P"

    So i can't help scouts with their computers if i don't know about P2P?

    I had better get to practicing ;p
    Honest your Honor, I was only educating myself so i could help scouts :)

  98. Conflict by Peyna · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that this might conflict with the Environmental Science merit badge. After all, we all know that a lack of pirates is the main reason for global warming. Boy Scouts should be punished for not being pirates, and being a pirate should be a prerequisite to earning the Environmental Science merit badge.

    Yes, I realize the article is not about a merit badge, and that environmental science is different than environmentalism

    --
    What?
  99. Further proof that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a good boy scout is a dead boy scout.

  100. They should also add... by dentar · · Score: 1

    merit badges for NOT killing someone and NOT doing drugs and NOT illegally taking campaign contributions and NOT speeding and NOT masturbating and NOT coveting (ad nauseum)

    Scout 1: Praise Jeezus! I got my merit badge for NOT yet killing anyone!
    Scout 2: Praise God! Me too!
    Scout 3: Let's go masturbate in that tent over there!
    Scout 4: I can't join you guys, I got my "Don't masturbate" badge last week.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
    1. Re:They should also add... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Uh...

      What scouts were YOU in?

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  101. Boy Scout ideology by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 1

    Ever since I was in Boy Scouts, about 20 years ago, there have been situations with local groups within the organization doing radical things. All the anti-gay and you-must-believe-in-god stuff was instigated by a few local hot shots. It was when the national organization refused to overturn local anti-gay policy that a lot of the more moderate members of the organization and donors left. I think that has created somewhat of a snowball effect. The BSA has become smaller and smaller and more and more conservative. At one point, the national organization did tell the local people to cool it (especially on the religious issues) but it was too little too late.

    I notice that a lot of Slashdotters posting to this discussion have mentioned that they are Eagle Scouts and I should point out that I am as well. The BSA was a great organization at one time. I wonder if the solution is to create a new Boy Scout organization (separate from the BSA) that is a member of the International Boy Scouts. Many countries have more than one national organization which is a member of the international organization.

    1. Re:Boy Scout ideology by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      It still is. If you'd go through the leader fast start training it gives you alot of things you should try snd do during the meeting....in my sons pack they did none of this. Also, important to note, when looking at the BSA materials, no where does it state you MUST be Christian, Jew, Muslim or whatever. It just says that it must be a part of your life and a important part at that. The council we're in seems to have it's head on straight and does not push Christianity at all at any level. If they did, then they would not be a haunted woods thing at our boy scout camp.

      --

      Gorkman

  102. I've got a Public Service Announcement by twitter · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see boyscouts or anyone else make it, but I doubt they will get an MPAA merit badge for it. Script posted previously.

    It's stupid to create restrictions for ideas and that stupidity shines through if you apply the same logic to anything besides ideas. Publishing is about sharing, not hoarding. Those "publishers" who don't get it need to fade away.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I've got a Public Service Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Script posted previously.

      That would be funny and/or insightful if it wasn't for the fact that Ford is not about to lose any business to people copying cars by clicking a button... dumbass.

  103. Victor Zuniga sells out LA scouts by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Thanks for posting this. It really helps me narrow down my protests to the guilty council

    You're welcome. Title is a g000glbmb for future searches on the name "Victor Zuniga" the BSA LA Area Council PR Director who sold 52,000 scouts to the MPAA

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
  104. US-provided WMDs were used on Kurds. by FatSean · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...as well as other ethnic minorities Saddam didn't like. Too bad they didn't find any WMDs that hadn't degraded to uselessness.

    Don't forget the threat of 'yellow cake from Africa'! The Germans told us the informant was un-reliable but Bush took it to the State of the Union and told the country it was true.

    Or the Al-Quieda ties...

    I can only hope that every Bush voter has a friend or loved one maimed, murdered, or mutilated by the violence Bush stirred up in the Middle East with this unneeded war.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:US-provided WMDs were used on Kurds. by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can only hope that every Bush voter has a friend or loved one maimed, murdered, or mutilated by the violence Bush stirred up in the Middle East with this unneeded war.

      Well you had me agreeing with you right up until the point you wrote this bullshit. You're a pretty sorry excuse for a human being if you really believe that. Did you ever think that those innocents you are wishing harm upon might not have agreed with the idea of the war either? Or do you just consider them "collateral damage" making you no better than the man you condemn?

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:US-provided WMDs were used on Kurds. by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Don't forget the threat of 'yellow cake from Africa'! "

      But, but, Sean Hannity told me this turned out to be True?!?

    3. Re:US-provided WMDs were used on Kurds. by chis101 · · Score: 1

      I can only hope that every Bush voter has a friend or loved one maimed, murdered, or mutilated by the violence Bush stirred up in the Middle East with this unneeded war.

      That's not very nice at all. I didn't vote for Bush, but I have friends that do. Thus, I am a friend of someone who voted for Bush... why do you want me dead?

      And why wish for more violence?

    4. Re:US-provided WMDs were used on Kurds. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I can only hope that no one else dies or is injured in this needless, unjustified conflict. No one.

    5. Re:US-provided WMDs were used on Kurds. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1
      I can only hope that every Bush voter has a friend or loved one maimed, murdered, or mutilated by the violence Bush stirred up in the Middle East with this unneeded war.
      You actually hope for the death or mutilation of soldiers, Iraqis, and other civilians as long as they are related to a Bush supported?

      I've heard a lot of sick things from both sides of the fence but this tops it.
    6. Re:US-provided WMDs were used on Kurds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So "I was only following orders" is an acceptable excuse for war then?

      Simply put, if those soldiers didn't want to be there, desert. Join the jails. Object, conscienciously (or however that is spelled).

  105. Re:FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Get over the language games and talk about the actual issue.

    It is a language game because that is how it is handled in our courts of law!!

    If you steal a CD from a store it is a criminal offense and this is tried in a criminal court.

    If you copyright infringe a Mp3 you download it is a civil offense and this is tried in a criminal court.

    If you go into a civil court an tell the judge "That man stole my song!" the judge will laugh and your lawyer will weep. Why is this so hard to understand?

    Laws are 100% about words and interpretation of language.

    What the RIAA and others are trying to do is win a war of the words by making society see copyright infringement as akin to eating babies. Its more on the lines of evading taxes... Which by some accounts people see as not evil or evil as going into someone's house and stealing money.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  106. Eagle Scout by CherniyVolk · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I'm not an Eagle Scout; more by choice than anything. Years ago, I took a honest interest in scouting, but was very disappointed in the whole scheme. While some might assert that scouting isn't supposed to be a focus on survival skills, why else for all the survivalist training such as cooking without stove, camping with minimal supplies, hunting etc.? OK, so there are much better clubs to join that can better teach you how to eat dirt, weeds and to build a sheltor out of leaves and bark... but I was still rather annoyed at how little the Boy Scouts prepared a young adult for if they did get lost in the woods and had to get by a few days.

    Looking back on those days, I realize that the Boy Scouts is heavily capitalist, despite any hopes a young scout might have for actually learning something for outdoor life. I remember the joy of seeing the Boy Scout emblem on my new portable stove, knife, compas etc. It never really dawned on me till after the fact, the Boy Scouts were actually far more mainstream than what people might expect. For a real life comparison, they are like the Air Force with air conditioned, reinforced tents in "war" rather than the Marines left to cover up with whatever they might, their jackets, a rock... anything but no air conditioner. I also came to realize everything in the Scouts was geared towards making me think like a malible consumer. A consumer which even if he isn't "sold" by advertisement, will still buy whatever is in the advertisement. A consumer who thinks that name brand is everything (does it have the Boy Scout Emblem!?). The dangers in this, is also an intiment involvment with the authorities behind the hype, and I assert no organization, no company should be above either the People or the Government. It is often in Capitalist Nations that people tend to bag on the government and forgive the Company without considering the fact that all their horrors were becuase of the Company rather than the Government; America doesn't go to war becuase of public support, but becuase of entire industry wide consensus (A lot of private/public companies making money off of our campaign in the Gulf and that money is not going to expand Middle Class. This is fact.).

    Yeah, I learned how to pitch a tent, tie a few knots, and clean a wound. But, honestly, I could have figured that out along the way anyways... the depth of how much they teach in the Boy Scouts I believe is a hidden agenda as well. "You're too stupid to do much else, and trust Big Business and it's ability to make sure you won't ever have to decide which flower or weed you can eat. If you do end up in the woods, your car broke down and left you stranded becuase of Government regulations. In the meantime buy this handy Boy Scout Portable Stove, Boy Scout Portable Water Purification Kit and Boy Scout Compas to help tide you over till Big Business will rescue you."

    The Boy Scouts is really a political/economic condition course for a particular ideology. The fact is, most capitalists embracing nations have Youth Programs all, in some way, dubbed as "scouts". Communists, tend to go for "pioneers". They all expose simple survival aspects which more give an impression of the phenomenal attraction to "Tips'n'Tricks", while underneath the stage tricks and simple wood carving classes... there's a political, philosophical, economic lesson vehemently pushed and ingrained in the childs mind.

    Sure you get a letter from the President for making Eagle Scout. Those that are trying to push their message are often proud of their efforts; yes, it's worth something to put on your resume, there are benefits adding to real life incentive to encourage parents to toss their children into these programs.

    Bottom line. I didn't learn all that much while in the Boy Scouts. If you went against the grain you were punished for it. For example, most of the kids in my district ran around with State Fair, Stainless Steal, Rambo "Survival Knives"... it seemed the ONLY non-Boy Scout peace of gear authorized for use du

    1. Re:Eagle Scout by hkb · · Score: 1

      For a real life comparison, they are like the Air Force with air conditioned, reinforced tents in "war" rather than the Marines left to cover up with whatever they might, their jackets, a rock... anything but no air conditioner.

      Uhm, I don't know what country's Air Force you're talking about, but you're an idiot of you're referring to the USAF. I never saw an air conditioned, reinforced tent anywhere.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    2. Re:Eagle Scout by Hahnsoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      With the Boy Scouts, as with many things, your mileage may vary. It is HIGHLY dependent on the people that you were with, both scouts and leaders. I learned how to live with just a tarp, a knife, and a rope in the wilderness. I had friends who shared my interests in computers, gaming, and various geeky activities. Individuality was encouraged, and we had scout leaders across the political spectrum from liberal to moderate to conservative. We were taught tolerance and the value of freedom. We played capture the flag (real life version, not Quake *grin*), dodgeball, and many games of Magic: the Gathering, Shadowrun, and Battletech. My younger brother learned how to make a campfire in the pouring rain with just 2 matches and some damp wood. I have nothing but fond memories of the time I spent in scouts. Like the parent poster, I was a Life Rank, had a bazillion Merit Badges, and was Assistant Scout Master (never made it into Order of the Arrow). Unlike the parent poster, though, the people who surrounded me were supportive, fun, and not tied to any propoganda or agenda.

    3. Re:Eagle Scout by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      Clearly you don't know what you're talking about either, which makes you an idiot, according to your terms. I deployed to Afghanistan, and the living quarters there can easily be described as a reinforced, air conditioned tent.

      However, with that said, he doesn't have a clue about the military in general. Very rarely will you encounter the kinds of conditions you saw in Jarhead, unless the unit is actually out on an unmounted patrol, something I'm not entirely certain happens outside of SF, and they're all volunteers for that. I give them great credit, but zero sympathy for the conditions they endure, as that only lessens the sacrifice they all too willingly make.

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
  107. a teachable moment that will depend on the teacher by schwaang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My first reaction was like that. It seems like Scouting, which I admire, is being misused for propaganda (other than the obsolete proto-militarism that it was created for).

    But after thinking about it, this IS an interesting merit-badge subject because it involves both something relevant to today's kids (MP3s) AND an issue of ethics, which is a strong point of Scouting.

    Ethics come most into play when the temptation is high and the risk seems low. Piracy is a great example. So it's a teachable moment for ethics, which aren't taught explicitly in many places these days.

    Of course, if the whole thing comes packaged by the ??AA then it will suck, because it won't question the ethics of the laws themselves.

  108. What the Boy Scouts really need by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

    ...is a Critical Thinking patch. It would feature a hand clenched into a fist, with the middle finger extended, and the words "QUESTION AUTHORITY" emblazoned across the top.

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  109. Re:ZONK EARNED THE "BUTT PIRATE" MERIT BADGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: When does a Cub Scout become a Boy Scout?

    A: After he eats his first Brownie

  110. Boy scouts have always been preach by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    However, I feel that the scout organization has fallen so far from its original intended roots that it's nothing but a special interest shadow of its former self. It's very sad, because what once was an organization that helped kids learn about skills and camping and other simple yet vital tasks for a well rounded person have been hammered away into anti-gay, christian centric whored out to any group that wants type of thing.

    The scouts have always been that way. Morality has always been a large part of the beliefs.

  111. 80 year old grandmas by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    "No word yet on if that includes helping the MPAA file lawsuits against 80 year old grandmothers."

    They get a merit badge for helping them across the street to their trial.

    --
    This sig is false.
  112. Piracy and the movie industry by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

    While I don't condone piracy/theft (yes stealing, not what you /.er's call 'copyright infringment)in any form, I also don't codone brainwashing our youth via a corporate sponsor.

    This is a matter best left to parents. Please teach your children to be moral adults and not to steal music and movie content. Also teach them to stick up for their fair use rights and participate in our democracy via either voting and/or serving the public themselfs.

    As far as the movie industry crying wolf in regards to jobs lost. That is a joke in and of its self. Does anyone remember the term "spagetti western"? These are 50's-70's cowboy movies shot in Italy to save cost. This put Americans in the film industry out of work WAY before digital theft reared its ugly head.

    So this whole angle of the MPAA is basically lies.

  113. government created monopolies not capitalistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The original copyright laws were socialist in nature as the constitutional purpose was the promote science and art, by allowing limited publishing monopolies.
    But, as the limits kept being extended/extinguished, the publishing monopolies became something that was treated more like property,
    and something of a an artificial "capitalist" market did appear to form.

    But note that after the point when the monopoly no longer serves any innovative purpose, this is a complete artificial government monopoly, with no more purpose/value than allowing someone to "own" the color red or allowing someone to patent the layout of the solor system.

  114. Wow new youth group! by wwiiol_toofless · · Score: 1

    The MPAA Jugend. "Vas is dat? You have been shtealing muzik? Off to zee kamp with you!" Sons will be ratting out their parents to the File Gestapo...

    --
    the mods may say you posted flamebait, but to me it's a flame that warms my heart. rock on, brother! --chebucto
  115. Re:Not Surprising by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

    Not Mormon, but definitely conservative protestant Christian. One quick fact - in my council, the last digit of the troop number denotes what type of church the troop is chartered to. 1 for LDS, 4 for Presbyterians, 0 for Methodist, etc.

    You are right that BSA has become more outspoken about which religious morals you have to believe in. I am amazed that there are Jews and Catholics in scouts still.

  116. I don't think they recognize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't think they recognize how easy it is to download the pattern online and sew your own anti-piracy merit badge.

  117. BSA has taken stance against piracy since 2005 by slightlytwisted · · Score: 5, Informative
    Consider the following questions which must be answered in order to earn your Computer merit badge, the requirements of which were updated in 2005:

    1. Why it is not permissible to accept a free copy of a copyrighted computer game or program from a friend
    2. The restrictions and limitations of downloading music from the Internet
    3. Why copyright laws exist
    http://www.usscouts.org/mb/mb036.html
    1. Re:BSA has taken stance against piracy since 2005 by dufachi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quick Answers: 1. It is perfectly legal if the license agreement allows it. Many freeware and/or open-source programs are copyrighted, but the license allows them to be distributed for free. In some cases, the authors encourage you to share their program with others. 2. What restrictions? Several capitalist ventures are profiting daily off music downloads for a fee such as iTunes, Rhapsody, Yahoo, etc. 3. To serve the capitalistic monopoly seekers, naturally. There, now everyone can get their merit badge just by searching /.

      --
      -Kinsey
  118. Funny and shameful by stephantom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Being a member of the scouts and an activist for the piracy movement all at once I don't welcome the decision of the BSA to join forces with the MPAA/RIAA/whatever. Scouting is ment to communicate, exchange and explore culture on an international level. The reason why the scouts could become such a huge movement was - and ever will be - cooperation and communication with other people in other regions/countries. Killing down ways to freely (and anonymously) share our culture is in no way compatible with even the most basic ideas of scouting, as I see them. Everyone can rest assured that we scouts are free human being who were taught to think for themselves. We believe in critical thinking, at least most of us do.

    1. Re:Funny and shameful by kindbud · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Scouting is ment to communicate, exchange and explore culture on an international level.

      Except for gays and atheists.

      The reason why the scouts could become such a huge movement was - and ever will be - cooperation and communication with other people in other regions/countries.

      Except for gays and atheists.

      Everyone can rest assured that we scouts are free human being who were taught to think for themselves.

      Except for gays and atheists, who are taught only where the door is.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Funny and shameful by stephantom · · Score: 1
      Except for gays...
      Correct me if I am wrong, but the basic understandings of the scouting movement don't indicate that we should exclude homosexuals. We have indeed four to five gay members in our local group. It may be that the Boy Scouts of America have their own policies on that. But please don't reduce the global scouting movement to just the US. There's more to scouting than just the american understanding.

      and atheists, who are taught only where the door is.
      The basic rules for scouting say that "you should have a god". The definition of "god" is left out here. Everyone who joins the scouts should fill this definition for him/herself. Again, the Boy Scouts of America have their own way of setting priorities and interpreting this rules. On the one hand the rules of scouting say that you should respect other cultures and believes and that you should have an open mind for everyone. On the other hand, God is present in our oath and also in our basic rules. I am not very happy with the BSA, because I believe that scouting should be open for everyone - everywhere. Please have a look at the scouting for all initiative if you'd like to read more! Just to clear things up: I am not an American, I am living in Austria (a small country in Europe, in cause you don't know it).
  119. Bullshit, asshole. by TheNoxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just how, exactly, does an inquiry into a land deal end up with questions about sexual tendencies?

    So you have a problem with him lying about something that the trial in question had absolutely nothing to do with? Even though you would have done EXACTLY THE SAME FUCKING THING AND SO WOULD EVERY OTHER MAN ON EARTH?

    I've fucking had it with you hypocritical, uneducated Republican shitheels hamming it up on Slashdot, as if you had one fucking ounce of moral fiber in your being.

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
    1. Re:Bullshit, asshole. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      No, please, tell us how you REALLY feel.

      Although I'd appreciate it if you didn't call me a liar.

    2. Re:Bullshit, asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, please, tell us how you REALLY feel.

      I really feel that you're a mindless piece of shit for using such a trite, shopworn locution as you just did

      Although I'd appreciate it if you didn't call me a liar.

      Fuck you.

      Fuck your appreciation.

      We need neither, you supercilious son of a bitch.

  120. MPAA offering a merit PATCH by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

    Actually, as was pointed out already, the article clearly says merit patch, not badge. According to a person active in the Boy Scouts in the next cubical to me, there is a big difference. This also seems to be general to LA, and not the entire US, too.

    Transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  121. No, it really is not stealing: here's an example by CGameProgrammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Person A buys a laptop:
    - Dell gets $$$
    - Person A gets a laptop


    Person B wants a laptop. He steals it from Person A:
    - Dell does not get any more money
    - Person A loses the laptop they paid for
    - Person B gets a laptop


    Person A buys a CD:
    - Artist gets $$$
    - Person A gets music


    Person A rips the CD and uploads the contents to a file-sharing service. Person B downloads it:
    - Artist gets no money
    - Person A still has the music
    - Person B also has music


    As you can see, the creator getting no money in both examples, but in the first example Person A loses his item, while in the second scenario it's Person A that's actually allowing Person B to download a copy. Person A is the pirate, not person B.

    --
    ~CGameProgrammer( );
  122. How big a felony would Clinton have to commit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how big a felony would Clinton have to commit before you'd fail to support him?

    Because his sexual activities were subject to being questioned because he was being sued for sexual harrassment.

    Whether you like it or not, it's the liberals and "progressives" in the US that has made "patterns of conduct" admissable in sexual harrassment cases, and that has also by definition made sexual relations with an underling by a supervisor or other superior "quid pro quo" sexual harassment.

    Don't fucking like it? Take it out on NOW.

    But Clinton lied under oath about his sexual harassment of underlings. By the very definition Democrats voted into law.

  123. Greater of two evils by a55clown · · Score: 1

    The last time I heard about the boy scouts in the news was when the troop leaders were sodomizing the boys, or something like that.

    So why did I get an even bigger shudder when I read the headline for this story?

    It's one thing to say "that's bad" when talking about child molestation, because it is. It's virtually a universally-accepted tenet of society: don't fuck the children.

    It's a completely different thing when we're talking about a "moral" value that most people give two shits about, i.e. piracy. Even worse to support when the key figures behind the curtain include the MPAA. I don't doubt for a second that the RIAA is in on it too.

    They're cheating! Hiding behind a cute little bunny rabbit or teddy bear, if you will. "Boy Scouts are honest, and they're on our side" HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ARGUMENT.

    Fucking campers.

  124. Educate yourselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not about not doing something, and this is not a reflection of the BSA as a whole. This is about the movie industry encroaching where they shouldn't and about the BSA leadership in L.A. that do not have a clue. This is not a reward for not pirating. It is an educational program that the movie industry hopes will prevent piracy in the future. It obviously will not work, and is a waste of time for everyone. What is even more of a waste is reading all of your comments on this subject. 98% of you just don't have a clue.

  125. this is a good thing, just spin it by phrostie · · Score: 1

    have them learn about the GPL and other such licences that allow you to distribute content without being a pirate

  126. Ethics by ultrasonik · · Score: 1

    It's a very interesting battle in ethics. Society decides what is right and wrong and then laws are set in place by that society to make sure everyone follows the consensus. Can you run around naked in public? In some societies, no problem. In others, that would be a terrible thing to do. Most kids today are growing up thinking that music, movies, games, etc should be free to all. The RIAA has to fight back against this idea because it breaks the model used to create these things. I think reversing the trend of change in kids' ethical values is the smartest thing the RIAA has ever done in this battle. However, it makes me feel very uncomfortable that a large commercial organization is trying to change the ethics of the nation in order to protect profits. I think it would be much wiser for them to work on changing the model that music and movies are created under to adapt to changing ethics of society. After all, is the free exchange of art in the form of music and movies really a bad thing for society? The freer the art, the freer the society imho.

  127. Re:ZONK EARNED THE "BUTT PIRATE" MERIT BADGE by Doomstalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Boy Scouts are in troops. Cub Scouts are the one's that have packs.

  128. Thanks for the support! by Gemini_25_RB · · Score: 1

    More proof that Boy Scouts arre tools.

  129. Boy scouts gone bad by mmalove · · Score: 1

    http://www.geocities.com/~Pack215/wolf.html#GOD

    For me, Boy Scouts went south right here, at the cub scouts level.

    I'm not trying to bash God loving people here or anything, but this sort of screws atheists. It's a required piece for advancement too.

    --
    You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
    1. Re:Boy scouts gone bad by robertjw · · Score: 1

      The only entry in that paragraph that would be at odds for an atheist would be

      d. Find out how you can help your church, synagogue, mosque, temple, or religious fellowship.

      I imagine this would be easy enough to substitute some other community organization.

      Not being an Atheist myself I don't know if I can understand, but wouldn't you want your children to explore the concepts of religion with you and discuss what you do (or don't) believe? I don't know, never having been a scout myself I don't know how big they are on religion, but we live in a world where religion exists. Your children should at least be aware of it and able to discuss their opinions.

  130. Utter disgust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in a boyscout group for ten years, and this just makes me puke.
    What is this, the MPAA's version of hitler jugend ?
    (godwin-mod me down if you wish, but i'm very pissed off about this)

    If anything, I would encourage kids nowadays to go out on the net and find whatever music/info/media caters to their taste and expand their cultural horizon. Why should cultural education cost $$$++ money ? (And tangential, why would only $-- go to the artist ?)
    Free dispersal of information and media is one of the most wonderful benefits of the internet phenomenon.

    And scouting as a movement is about critical thought, taking initiative, looking after the benefits of the group, and doing what needs to be done; and *not* about scaring the community into buying mainstream crap and ensure the pockets of these *AA assholes stay lined with royalty fees.

    (Sorry for ranting.)

  131. Lowering standards by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    It just breaks my heart to think you can earn a Space Exploration badge without a minute exposed to hard vaccuum and direct radiaton from the sun.

    I had an Eagle Scout friend growing up and some of the badges he went for actually seemed rather hard to get...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Lowering standards by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      "some of the badges he went for actually seemed rather hard to get..."

      Apparently, this new badge is part of Bushie's new "No scout left behind" program.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
  132. Jewscouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think on the latter you're thinking of the jewscouts.

  133. who still goes to boy scouts???????? by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 0, Troll

    aren't all the scoutmasters gay(not that i have anything against that, my sister is gay), and not to mention....who needs that when your on slashdot this is news for nerds, were not the guys who try and earn badges were the guys who what the boyscouts say "HackZ0red teh Ma1nframe!!!!"

    --
    -Noc
  134. backasswards by binarybum · · Score: 1

    Pirates wear patches, not boyscouts. What is this world coming to?

    --
    ôó
  135. Mod Parent Down: by Upaut · · Score: 1

    It's very sad, because what once was an organization that helped kids learn about skills and camping and other simple yet vital tasks for a well rounded person have been hammered away into anti-gay, christian centric whored out to any group that wants type of thing.

    Right. I'm sure that around the bible belt some troops have become like this, just as many organizations have. I am, on the other hand, an Eagle Scout from Massachusetts. We went camping, learned our knots, learned how to survive in the wilderness, learned how the goverment worked, helped the community, got involved with other organizations that helped the state, etc.

    * The faith of those in my troop consisted of the following: Nine agnostics, three deists, four atheists (there is a specific requirement for Eagle scout that requires a testimant of faith. Not a religiouse faith. All we needed to say is we has faith in the existance of atoms.), six people of the Jewish faith, two Buddists, one Hindu, and I think two prodestants. Of those that have since become Eagle scouts: One Atheist, One agnostic, One Buddist, and One Christian.

    * For the anti-gay thing, three members of my troop were gay and admitted it to the troop. Its not even a "Don't ask, don't tell" policy in scouting. Its a "Don't ask, Don't tell; if you tell, don't have sex with a guy in your tent during the camping trip". And I felt that it was a very equal position; as that only three times while I was active in scouting had anyone I have ever met, from another troop, been kicked out of scouting. Two were guys that was gay and got caught screwing during a trip. The other was a guy that got caught with his girlfriend while at a Scout camp. Basically I interprested the rule as don't have sex around the other scouts during a trip.

    If anything, Scouting showed me the diversity in my community, taught me to help my fellow man, taught me how to take a stand against things I disagree with, and helped me get ready for life. I also learned a little bit of many fields thanks to the Merit badges which helped broaden my intrests into many fields, some of which I took classes in college based on how I felt about the subject while in scouting. And as I left scouting at age 18, three years ago, I doubt that much as changed.

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  136. I was a Jewish scout by schneidafunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Excellent Points. I would like to elaborate on the religious aspect of scouts. I was in boyscouts from cub scouts until 18. I would say that my leaders in my particular troop were ignorant and prejudiced in many ways, but I know for a fact that many leaders were and are not. I made some great friends in boy scouts and also had some really great learning experiences. First time I got drunk was in boy scouts, the first time I shot a rifle was in boy scouts, the first time I learned that adults are not always right and leaders are sometimes stupider than their followers was in boy scouts.
     
    Now I was raised Jewish but currently I do not accept the literal translation of the old testament (or the new) and do not follow the traditions. In boy scouts I was required to go to jewish ceremonies sometimes (very rarely) and only when the other kids were required to goto church. Most of it was just for show. There are some underlying tones of religion, but I never felt that uncomfortable. Religion (and homosexuality) rarely came up in conversation.
     
      Remember, boy scouts is really just pre-military training. Don't ask, Don't tell.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  137. I'm hoping to urn my anti-murder badge by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 0

    Ya know, like making public service annoncments saying how all the cool kids don't murder and stuff. Golly, I'm gonna change the world!

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  138. "Editorial" "Policy" by Merovign · · Score: 1


    I'm sorry, but has the /. "editorial policy" (I know) crossed over from opposing the MPAA/RIAA's heavy-ham-handed tactics to actually encouraging copyright violation?

    I'm waiting for a different scent to waft from the post itself... ain't happenin'.

  139. Memories. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back when Napster was still an interesting thing, my mom (a lifelong scouter) asked me where I'd gotten a bunch of oldies music. Here's how I remember the conversation:

    "It's called Napster. It's a place where you can download free music off the Internet."

    "Is it legal?"

    "Not really. They'll probably have it shut down in a month or two."

    "Well, hurry and get what you can."

    My mom is as honest a person as I know. I just don't see this merit badge winning a whole lot of hearts and minds.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    1. Re:Memories. by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Maybe because copyright infringement maybe is not such *moral* crime as robbery or killing people? :)

      Naaahhh, it couldn't be. Otherwise those MPAA/RIAA guys should be filthy liars, right?

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  140. Price fixing merit Bbadge as well? by kkovach · · Score: 1

    Here's an idea. How bout a fookin' "price fixing, greedy ass, CDs should be no more than $5 by now!" badge?

    --
    The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
  141. Lying vs. "Not telling everything" by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Informative
    Lying under oath on the other hand is something I have a huge problem with. I think (although I can't offer any evidence) that most people felt the same way. If he had told the truth from the beginning, I would have defended him instead of calling for his resignation.


    Little known fact, thanks to the overzealous media and the Republican Congress, but Clinton did not lie under oath, and did not commit perjury.
    Perjury means (a) knowingly (b) making a false statement (c) about material facts (d) while under oath. It's not perjury if you honestly believe what you're saying is true, or if your lie is irrelevant to the issue you're under oath about. Moreover, the Supreme Court has ruled that it's OK for "a wily witness [to] succeed in derailing the questioner--so long as the witness speaks the literal truth."

    The judge who found Clinton in contempt of court said she did so because he made misleading statements and did not fully participate in the discovery phase of the trial. But she did say specifically that it wasn't perjury. The most often cited example for "lying under oath" is the "did you have sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky" question. Clinton asked the judge to define 'sexual relations', which she did - as intercourse. He didn't have intercourse, so he truthfully (while misleadingly) said "no". That's not a lie, and it's not perjury. However, it is interfering with discovery, and why he was found in contempt.

    The more you know! [star]

    1. Re:Lying vs. "Not telling everything" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Clinton admits misleading testimony, avoids charges in Lewinsky probe

      Under an agreement with Independent Counsel Robert Ray, Clinton's law license will be suspended for five years and he will pay a $25,000 fine to Arkansas bar officials. He also gave up any claim to repayment of his legal fees in the matter. In return, Ray will end the 7-year-old Whitewater probe that has shadowed most of Clinton's two terms.

      "I tried to walk a fine line between acting lawfully and testifying falsely, but I now recognize that I did not fully accomplish this goal and am certain my responses to questions about Ms. Lewinsky were false," Clinton said in a written statement released Friday by the White House.


      THE CLINTON MISCALCULUS

      On January 17, 1998, President Bill Clinton testified at what turned out to be the most significant deposition in U.S. history. Sworn to tell the truth, he calmly lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, falsely stating he was never alone with her and that he never had sexual relations with her. He would soon repeat his lies on television: "I never had sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky." Several months later he would attempt to wriggle out of his falsehoods in his videotaped grand jury testimony. But the harm was done. Clinton teetered for nearly a year on the edge of political ruin, becoming only the second president to be impeached. The scandal probably cost Al Gore the 2000 presidential election-either because it alienated voters from the Democratic party, or because the skittish Gore decided not to allow Clinton to campaign with him [or both].

      The consequences....

      Nearly all of Clinton's woes, including impeachment, are traceable to his perjury in the Jones deposition. Ultimately, there was no proof that he ever induced anyone else to lie, or that he concealed evidence, or that he destroyed gifts from Lewinsky. But there was no doubt [among any but the most credulous] that he flatly lied in his deposition, and was later less than candid about it when he testified before a grand jury. Clinton, alas, remains in denial. He wasn't lying, he writes; it was merely that he "had not been trying to be helpful to the Jones lawyers." Or, as he testified to the grand jury, "I was determined to walk through the minefield of this deposition without violating the law, and I believe I did."

      Well, he was mistaken. Ken Starr and the U.S. House of Representatives impeachment managers obviously concluded Clinton violated the law, although that was hardly an objective assessment. But so, too, did Judge Wright, who held Clinton in contempt for his false testimony. Clinton was also compelled to surrender his Arkansas law license because his evasive and misleading answers were prejudicial to the administration of justice.

      The greatest irony-or tragedy, or perhaps farce-is that Bennett easily could have rescued Clinton, if only the president had told him the truth. Adequately forewarned, Bennett surely would have counseled his client to tell the truth and skip the coy evasion. If the president refused, there were still feasible alternatives. They could have refused to attend the deposition, or they could have declined to answer "inappropriately personal questions," asserting a right to privacy.


  142. Re:ZONK EARNED THE "BUTT PIRATE" MERIT BADGE by gwbennett · · Score: 1

    Previously he had been kicked out of the Cub Scouts for eating a Brownie.

    --
    Where is this free beer everyone on Slashdot keeps talking about?
  143. I'm not trying to be flamebait or a troll .. by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'm not trying to be flamebait or a troll but the first thing that came to mind when I read the summry was the Nazi Youth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Youth),scroll down the linked page and look at the photo.

    I'm not trying to insult the Boy Scouts, its just what I thought. And for the record I was once a member of the cub scouts, droped out because I didn't fit in very well, too many narrow minds and narrow world views, at least with my troup.

    Now if you will excuse me I'm going to go put on my flame resistant armour.

  144. Repeat until MBi 24 by yusing · · Score: 1

    Merit badges are optional; there's a big range of choices to suit the individual. This would be one for a boy that's clenched a little tighter than most. Some boyscouts are bound to up being fragged by their own men.

    Scouting was cool when it was about getting outdoors and having fun with friends. But the programming was always lurking in the background. Something that "Lone Scouts" didn't have to put up with.

    --

    "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

  145. Whatever.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, the MPAA represents the companies and musicians that produce and labored to make their music and movies. If you don't like how they enforce their intellectual property rights then don't watch their movies or listen to their music. Don't sit there like a bunch of whiney kids complaining about how unfair they are for prosecuting people for ripping them off.

    As for the Boy Scouts issuing a badge for teaching their kids not to steal music and videos, well good for them. Stealing is stealing whether you want to think you have a God Given Right to have it for free or not. Get over it.

    1. Re:Whatever.... by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How exactly is copying akin to stealing? I ask this every time and all I get are these flawed analogies that don't make sense. Copying != Stealing.

      The problem with your suggestion is that the media cartels are so powerful that its hard to bypass them. As an artist, you can choose to go with some minor publishing house, but fuck if you're ever going to get your music in the big stores or played on any of the media conglomerates's brodcasting (TV/FM).

      Music and any other form of non-tangible easily reproduces media is something that no longer can be monopolized by media houses (be it the opera house, theatre, book publishers, etc). The average person can obtain the media with almost no effort. The interests the RIAA and MPAA represent are dated and quickly becoming obsolete. They are trying to sue their way out of oblivion. Rightly, as you say, they are being ripped off by a changing paradigm. It is their last gasp of free air. Media is something that can be massed consumed and the concept of having to pay for it seems illogical now.

      Artists are slowly starting to find new and better ways to reach their fans and make a living off of grateful audiences who, while not willing to be gouged by the RIAA for $15+ CDs, are willing to go the extra mile to see support their favorite artists.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    2. Re:Whatever.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they charging money for the music/video in expectation that it should be paid for by you? Did you pay for the music or video? No? Then that's stealing.

      When a Hong Kong pirate takes a video game and makes one thousand copies of it and sells it on the street for $2 each for what normally sells for $50 you'd say he didn't "steal" anything. He merely "copied" it right?

      The "media cartels" are out to make money. It's expensive to market, produce and distribute products, any product. There is no reason why the music/video industry can't charge a price for their product and expect to get paid for it. Again, if you don't like it then don't buy from them. It's not like they're selling food and water and you'll die if you don't get any.

      A monopoly on the "easily reproduced media" market may or may not be technically viable. Regardless, just because Youtube and P2P file sharing services exist and makes theft easier it doesn't make it any more right than the availability of lockpicks over the Internet makes breaking and entering socially acceptable.

      "Media is something that can be massed consumed and the concept of having to pay for it seems illogical now." - Fine. In the interim why don't you limit yourself to watching the freely available media and freely available music and refrain from stealing the music and videos that the companies are still looking to charge money to recoup their costs?

      "Artists are slowly starting to find new and better ways to reach their fans and make a living off of grateful audiences who, while not willing to be gouged by the RIAA for $15+ CDs, are willing to go the extra mile to see support their favorite artists." - Couldn't agree more. However just because you don't think you should pay $15 for a CD doesn't make it OK to go ahead and steal it when the company making it available is looking to get paid.

      Again, the argument you and others present is that you want everything for free and because it's easily copied by any idiot with a PC that it's not stealing. You can try to justify your opinion in any way you want, but the bottom line is that the companies have a product that they want to get paid for providing. If you don't pay them for the product you are stealing. There is no other way to explain your position.

  146. As an Eagle Scout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    As an Eagle Scout, I can certainly confirm that. Outside of the 'fluff' badges, many are quite involved. In particular, I remember Environmental Science, Backpacking and Emergency Preparedness as being fairly difficult.

    1. Re:As an Eagle Scout by bassgoonist · · Score: 1

      Ugh...no kidding. Emergency preparedness and environmental science were a pain! (meaning you actually had to do real work...:-p). Swimming was not a cakewalk either.

      --
      You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    2. Re:As an Eagle Scout by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My dad teaches for the environmental science badge. I think it's 2 hours a week on weekends, and I've seen college courses that were easier.

    3. Re:As an Eagle Scout by Firehed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. I didn't bring up being an Eagle because it was largely irrelevant, but the required badges are certainly more involved than Basketry (which I earned no less than five times in a single week of summer camp). Several of the badges require a minimum of ninety days involvement (personal fitness comes to mind, though I'm sure there were others).

      I won't get concerned until the "Respect for Intellectual Property" badge becomes Eagle-required. At which point I'll personally go down to headquarters and find out what the hell's going on, and tell them to get back to their proper (ie, founding) values. Scout's Honor.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:As an Eagle Scout by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
      I won't get concerned until the "Respect for Intellectual Property" badge becomes Eagle-required. At which point I'll personally go down to headquarters and find out what the hell's going on, and tell them to get back to their proper (ie, founding) values. Scout's Honor.

      Problem is, I'd imagine some (if not most, or even all) of the National Council members would give a 'respecting the properties of others is one of the most important parts of our founding values' spiel.

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    5. Re:As an Eagle Scout by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a former boyscout(shy of eagle by a nation project; stupid on my part) of the 60's/70's, I hate to admit that I have not followed them anymore. But I remember that some of what we had to do was multiple 20-30 mile hikes, as well as multiple winter camp-outs. I do remember having to do a mile swim for one, but another guy and I did 2 miles for the heck of it. In addition, for Order of the Arrow, we had to live off the woods for a weekend with just a knife and sleeping bag (like that is really hard). Somehow, it seems fairly trivial now. But by reading some of this and a bit of googling, it appears that things have gotten downright silly (and quite a bit easier).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:As an Eagle Scout by Firehed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well sure. But sucking up to one industry isn't a part of that. In any case, it's already covered in both the Scout Law and Oath, with the first point of "A Scout is Trustworthy" and "morally straight" respectively. The entire premise of Scouting is to live by the Oath and Law; none of the required badges (Camping, Citizenship in the Community, Cit. Nation, Cit. World, Communications, Cycling/Hiking/Swimming, Emergency Preparedness/Lifesaving, Environmental Science, Personal Fitness, Personal Management) are about reenforcing these points, but rather gaining the skills to be successful in life. Come to think of it, none of the badges I earned (35 or so, IIRC) are about anything but gaining skills of varying usefulness, and I can't think of any others that don't fit that model. If that changes, I'll be severely disappointed.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  147. they d*mn sure would raise an eyebrow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they found out he'd gone in the locker room while they were changing.

    The conditions a Scout leader inevitably has to be in with his charges are quite different from what coaches have to do with theirs.

  148. makes sense by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    because one of the badges of being a pirate is to not act like a boy scout

    so there is balance in all things. ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  149. Re:No, it really is not stealing: here's an exampl by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    I think you left out a part.

    Person A buys a CD:
    - Record company gets 99.999% of $$$
    - Artist gets 0.001% of $$$
    - Person A gets music

  150. BS by Dr+Floppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As an Eagle scout, I can guarantee that the only reason anyone would get this badge is to make a joke about it. They wont be able to sell the book and it will drop into history.

  151. Is anyone reminded... by PixieDust · · Score: 1
    Of the Captain Copyright Canada launched a while back?

    Additionally...

    to learn merit badges
    Should say EARN merit badges.
  152. As an Eagle Scout by Chas · · Score: 1

    All I can say about this is that I'm disgusted. I can't say that idiocy of this kind didn't take place when I was active as a boy, but "I" certainly don't remember being confronted with it. The same thing with the whole homosexuality thing. It just wasn't an issue.

    At least it's not a "required" merit badge (necessary for rank advancement of achieving Eagle Scout. There are a host of badges that only VERY small number of boys ever see. Like the guys in my first Eagle Letter who had gotten EVERY available merit badge.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  153. The Boy Scouts-Future Asshats of America by supabeast! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a shame what the Boy Scouts have become. When my father was a boy, doing well in the scouts was something to aspire to. There was a time when that Eagle Scout patch was a badge of honor. I enjoyed scouting quite a bit when I was younger (I'm 27 now) but by the time I had made it from Weblos to Boy Scouts, the right-wing crazies had already started taking control and as it got weirder I got out.

    Over the 1990s the Boy Scouts turned into an organization intolerant of those who do not subscribe to organized religion and promotes homophobia. Now they've added corporate shilling to their list of achievements. It's a great shame to see an organization that once churned out young men ready to lead a progressive society turned into a recruiting ground for religion, intolerance, and corporate shills.

  154. Helping 80-Year Old Grandmothers by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    Now, before helping an old lady across the street, the scout will question her. If she is in fact "pirating", he just pushes her out in front of a bus. In the RIAA's eyes, he was helping her across the street.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  155. indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch the full video of his deposition you can see what a total fucking genius the man is. I take a lot of issue with him, I didn't vote for him and I won't vote for his wife even if she is the only choice against more of what we've got now - but godamn if it doesn't really depend on what the meaning of the words 'is' is! Go watch the full deposition and you will understand. The funniest thing about it is that once it is over remind yourself that he is being investigated for a decade old land deal in which HE LOST MONEY. As much as I hate Clinton, he earned my sympathy and respect, and I love how he is still responsible for everything bad according to the crypto-fascists running the GOP today.

  156. The BSA by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Has just become a holllow money grabbing shell of what it used to be, and has turned into a pansy ass politically correct molding pot.

    What is next, a badge for 'being considerate of a trees feelings' ?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  157. Phew. by Devv · · Score: 1

    Hmm... April is long gone.. It must be true..Melting facts.. So basically you get this badge because you pay them money? Oh, and by the way, anyone interested in the superman absolutely bulletproof sexy badge? You just pay me this small amount of money and then you get further descriptions. (Be sure to keep som paper, glue, a pen at home) Of course I'm being unfair now! They actually sell something else too. It's like when you buy windows. You get IE and WMP but you want neither. And my favourite way to pass time is to not watch movies.

    --
    +1 Agree -1 Disagree
  158. No honest man can call Bush a christian. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Not really. What you call "torture" has was done in many past conflicts without anyone raising a peep.

    First of all, Amnesty International makes it their business to constantly "raise a peep" about these things.

    Secondly, putting "torture" in quotes to imply it isn't is sickening. Believe me, if someone kidnapped you, tied you up, beat you, deprived you of sleep, and pretended to drown you, you'd mentally remove those quote marks from the word "torture"... if you could do anything but think "god when will this stop".

    And finally, George W. Bush is not christian. He says he is, he pays lip service to a church, but every single action he takes, everything he says, goes against what Christ taught.
    Turn the other cheek? Bush says "preemtive war"
    Rich man getting in heaven? The priviledged are his base.
    Without sin, throw the first stone? Texas death-penalty record.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:No honest man can call Bush a christian. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Secondly, putting "torture" in quotes to imply it isn't is sickening. Believe me, if someone kidnapped you, tied you up, beat you, deprived you of sleep, and pretended to drown you, you'd mentally remove those quote marks from the word "torture"... if you could do anything but think "god when will this stop".

      I've been through it in training, so I know exactly what it's like. I still don't consider it torture. This is the same mentality that tells us it's wrong to occasionally discipline a child physically, or to eat meat because "it's cruel to the wiffle cows".

      As to your definition of Christianity, I certainly don't care if Bush is a Christian or not because I'm definitely not. However, by your definition, there's probably been maybe 10 "real Christians" since the religion first began. All those poor deluded bastards fighting in WW2 should have just turned the other cheek, right?

    2. Re:No honest man can call Bush a christian. by madcow_bg · · Score: 1

      I've been through it in training, so I know exactly what it's like. I still don't consider it torture. This is the same mentality that tells us it's wrong to occasionally discipline a child physically, or to eat meat because "it's cruel to the wiffle cows". For what I know I am not a cow or a child. I have not only constitutional rights, but also BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS (and the declaration was signed/whatever by USA). If torture was moral or legal, it would be used on US sitizens as well, all the time. But a child is a child, and disciplining a child is still not torture by almost all people's definitions. The declaration of human rights explicitly says that every man have the right to preserve their honor. If you like being tortured, go ahead. Just don't expect all will like that. And what's wrong if you don't eat meat? I personally have butchered pigs (not sure what the term is), but I don't like animal torture.

  159. How about.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    A badge for telling the *AA to goto hell and copying everything in sight instead?

    A black badge, with a pirate flag in the background and a hand, showing the thumbs up in the foreground .. perhaps with a "C" with a line thru it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  160. Re:FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! by cliffski · · Score: 1

    Your comparison with taxes is an interesting one. If you are my neighbour and your not paying taxes, then by definiton, I am the one paying for your roads, your police, your clean air, and your military protection. In the UK, Id be paying for your educationa nd health care too. Given the size of the market for these products (population of country) and the fixed costs, you not paying means I pay more.
    Many people would thus regard you (the tax dodger) as a leech (or worse). Often, the people dodging the tax like to spread stories about how the govt is evil, and its all wasted and the decent people dont see any of the money etc, as fud to defend not paying their taxes. Very similar to how people moan about the 0.1% of musicians who drive ferraris, or namecheck artists they dont like, or havent written good songs for ages. Normally the people who *do* pay the taxes, are happy with the deal they get. If they werent they would vote in a different party with different tax policies. This is like buying different products.

    Quite how you think this makes illegal filesharing seem anything but socially unacceptable leeching is not clear.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  161. Vessel Hull Designs by burndive · · Score: 1
    --
    ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  162. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only problem with getting that one is that you have to turn it back in afterwards for going against it :-)

  163. I got the "Atheist" merit badge by Draconix · · Score: 1

    They let me out of the scouts before all the other kids.

    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
  164. you missed the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the point wasn't the blow job, it was it puts the president-a rather powerful figure on the planet earth, in a position of being *blackmailed*. And we don't know to this day whether that happend or not, and if it did, before it all came out, what happened against the interests of the US that we don't know about yet? How many other political/military/big economic figures are right now being blackmailed due to similar events? The "honeypot" trap is a remarkably successful intelligence tool, it has been used for centuries.

    Google for the remarkable tie between lewinsky and "the condit affair" and see if you don't see a honeypot trap "cell" working.

  165. Martin Scorcese curses himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have made the Departed with this backdrop

  166. Obedience by alexo · · Score: 4, Interesting


    > As an Eagle Scout, I can say first-hand that the Boy Scouts DOES teach scouts how to obey the law.

    Just out of curiosity, do they also teach the scouts that there are cases where you should disobey the law?

  167. Im sorry by probain · · Score: 1

    Im gonna say this first, please forgive my bad spelling (im Swedish).

    Im sorry for being a possible ignorant (being european and all). But isn't this a bit WAY overboard? Pardon me for saying this, but recruiting young people for something like this just rings H-jugend in my mind. It frickin discusts me how some companies, or an alliance of them, can do things in this world (worse thing has happened all over the glode). Of course it's great that young people are taught too obey the laws and rules of said country. But PLEASE, isn't up to the goverment (or something democritical) to do theese things?!

    (once again, please don't get picky about spelling or something trivial like that)

  168. Fail your IP merit badge and we'll sue your daddy! by ShagratTheTitleless · · Score: 0

    It's like the MPAA/RIAA are competing against NAMBLA to see who can be the most disgusting influence on Scouting. What happened to learing to tie knots?

    --
    Sometimes at night I imagine the darkness is filled with horrible things with too many teeth, like Julia Roberts.
  169. That's not even the worst badge out there by shma · · Score: 1

    Really, there's worse things that you can earn a badge for.

    --
    I came here for a good argument
  170. Let's list the new Scout Merit Badges! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    Now that the scouts are pwned by the lobbiests I bet the special interests are lining up to get thier interests added to the Boy Scout youth movement agenda:

    - the Microsoft WGA enforcement merit badge

    - the SCO source code violation spotter

    - the Chevron Oil Advantage badge

    Anyone have any others to add?

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  171. Boy Scouts' Fake Morality by solszew · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised. BSA has long been morally hypocritical. Non-Christians are made to be uncomfortable in Scouts, and out homosexuals are not welcome, though if you hide your colors, BSA does have a kind of "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Thier new relationship w/ the MPAA is right in line with their fucked up moral philosophy.

    I hope my kids don't want to be Boy Scouts.

    --

    Steve O.
    I am really, really exhausted.
  172. What about the badge for keeping your mouth... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...shut as Akela plays with your pee pee? Or is it open? I get confused.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  173. Wasn't this done in Taiwan already? by sjs132 · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, the kids were being convinced to visit pirate sites and send it to some government sponsored group that would "Follow up" on the tips... and then your next door neighbor and his family would disapear.

    Or something like that... :(

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  174. Let them know how you feel. by bobthemuse · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've written an email to their executives, I suggest that all current and former Scouts do the same. From: http://www.boyscoutsla.org/website/contact_us.htm Barnes, Steve Scout Executive 217 Steve. Barnes@boyscoutsla.org Bonsky, Paul Special Projects Executive 227 Paul.Bonsky@boyscoutsla.org Borunda, Lala Finance Secretary 235 Lala.Borunda@boyscoutsla.org Burgueno, Rita Urban Emphasis Executive 272 Rita.Burgueno@boyscoutsla.org Brown, James IT Specialist 283 James@compphys.com Burton, Kevin Webmaster 283 Kevin.Burton@boyscoutsla.org Chan, Ana Receptionist 0 Ana.Chan@boyscoutsla.org Chaffers, Tanya Accounts Payable 245 Tanya.Chaffers@boyscoutsla.org Chicas, Estela Registrar 207 Estela.Chicas@boyscoutsla.org Curtis, Brian Director of Field Services 262 Brian.Curtis@boyscoutsla.org De Jarnett, Cindy Pacifica District Executive 256 Cindy.DeJarnett@boyscoutsla.org Dumani, Maria Administration Secretary 216 Maria.Dumani@boyscoutsla.org Hatch, Wade Director of Camping Services 243 Wade.Hatch@boyscoutsla.org Felcyn, Anna Rio Hondo Senior Executive 285 Anna.Felcyn@boyscoutsla.org Forbes, Larry Chief Financial Officer 280 larry.forbes@boyscoutsla.org Gonzalez, Leo San Antonio District Executive 220 Leo.Gonzalez@boyscoutsla.org Hatch, Wade Director of Camping Services 243 Wade.Hatch@boyscoutsla.org Matsuzaki, Lynn Urban Emphasis Executive 269 Lynn.Matsuzaki@boyscoutsla.org Maxfield, John Director of Support Services 251 John.Maxfield@boyscoutsla.org McCarthy, Jim Frontier District Director 282 Jim.McCarthy@boyscoutsla.org Monge, Marcos Rio Hondo District Executive 238 Marcos.Monge@boyscoutsla.org Peña, Andrea Finance Director 261 Andrea.Pena@boyscoutsla.org Peralta, Gracie Office Manager 252 Gracie.Peralta@boyscoutsla.org Peterson, Trinita Payroll & Benefits Specialist 277 Trinita.Peterson@boyscoutsla.org Reck, Roger Executive Finance Director 215 Roger.Reck@boyscoutsla.org Roberson, Jennifer Field Services Secretary 233 Jennifer.Roberson@boyscoutsla.org Rojas, Mariela Cashier 254 Mariela.Rojas@boyscoutsla.org Rosenberg, Laura Event Secretary 250 Laura.Rosenberg@boyscoutsla.org Ruiz, Robert Facilities Maintenance 205 Robert.Ruiz@boyscoutsla.org Shipp, Gwangi Thunderbird District Executive 226 Gwangi.Shipp@boyscoutsla.org Spagnoli, Tony Rio Hondo District Executive 273 Tony.Spagnoli@boyscoutsla.org Sullivan, Hannibol Asst. Director of Field Services 319 Hannibol.Sullivan@boyscoutsla.org Turner, Flynn Pacifica District Executive 223 Flynn.Turner@boyscoutsla.org Verdugo, Danette Camping Services Secretary 257 Danette.Verdugo@boyscoutsla.org Villalobos, George Finance Director 240 George.Villalobos@boyscoutsla.org Zuniga, Victor Pacifica District Director 274 Victor.Zuniga@boyscoutsla.org

  175. Write them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Victor Zuniga (mentioned in the article)
    Pacifica District Director
    Victor.Zuniga@boyscoutsla.org

    Steve Barnes
    Scout Executive
    Steve. Barnes@boyscoutsla.org

  176. Godwinned! by autophile · · Score: 1
    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  177. Outlaw competition! by the_raptor · · Score: 1

    By that logic if I create a product that sells better than my competitors I am guilty of stealing. How dare I deprive someone of the expectation for being compensated for their product, by producing something people would rather buy.

    If I don't pay the barber who cuts my hair, then I have directly taken his time. But if someone creates a song for the general public and I don't buy it (whether I infringe his copyright, just listen to the radio instead of buying albums or don't listen to it at all), I am not directly taking their time.

    I buy most of my copyrighted works, but every time I see an idiotic anti-"piracy" campaign (which really is the equivalent of calling not tipping, "rape"), I get closer to the point where I will stop paying for such material. Using inflamatory language does undermine the message of your campaign.

    --

    ========
    CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
  178. INWO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MPAA control the Boy Scouts, who are allied with Al Gore, who is controlled by Barney, who is owned by the Gnomes of Zurich, who are aligned with Bill Gates. It's all clear now!

  179. What is the icon on these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kinda icon can they put on a no-piracy merit badge? It would look so pansy-ish that no one would wear it. I propose that we start selling badges with the pirate bay logo on them. Show your support for the Bay and get a badge while doing it. No, I'm not trying to bash scouts, believe me, I just dropped out because of others in the troop. I just don't see why people like the scouts are being recruited for this, when everyone knows that people like me in that age group will download music/movies before we'll pay for them. We don't have jobs, cars or money, so piracy for us is the same as in China, the only solution.

  180. IT IS NOT A MERIT BADGE! by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    It is also only in the LA council and NOT approved anywhere else. In fact the BSA is standing up for you by NOT LETTING IT BE A MERIT BADGE!

    I would be that the badge is still born in any other ocuncil in the nation.

    1. Re:IT IS NOT A MERIT BADGE! by pyser · · Score: 1

      It is also only in the LA council and NOT approved anywhere else. In fact the BSA is standing up for you by NOT LETTING IT BE A MERIT BADGE!

      Good. From the article it was unclear whether it was an actual merit badge or simply a patch one could earn by learning or doing something useful, like Leave No Trace. I'd be surprised if BSA would allow such an item to be an official merit badge with so little thought. Look how much effort it took to create the Fly Fishing and Composite Materials badges.

  181. Local Councils Can Create Non-Merit Badges by cmholm · · Score: 1

    After giving the MPAA pamphlet and badge design a look, it's obvious this is an "extra-curricular" badge, so I wouldn't worry about it.

    That the LA Council would have this doesn't surprise me, since these badges tend to reflect the local culture. Out in the Aloha and Maui County Councils, we've got the Hawaiiana badge. It's requirements are to learn and perform various skills of traditional Hawaiian culture, including some dance, song, theater, games, materials, agriculture, etc. It's actually quite a bit of work for someone not already a member of a hula halau, and is a 4 hour a day, 7 day class when offered at the two summer camps in the state. The class ends the week with a public performance in front of the rest of the camp. I've found the results relatively impressive, particularly from mainland Scouts whose previous exposure to Hawaiian "culture" stopped at coconut bras.

    The Hawaiiana badge is moderately attractive, but the only reason to do the badge besides that is the desire to learn the material, because it doesn't count towards rank advancement. Neither does the MPAA badge, and unless the material proves interesting in its own right, only a handful of rabid patch collector Scouts are going to bother with it.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  182. Scouting and the MPAA by timcough · · Score: 1

    It's incredible what lengths the MPAA will go through to spread their propaganda. As a scout leader on the opposite end of the country, I actually find it more disturbing that the Los Angeles Area Council would go along with it. (As an aside though, this is not a merit badge. See meritbadge.com for a list of current badges).

  183. That is so twisted... by tuxtastic · · Score: 0

    But, then again, so are the Boy Scouts...

  184. RTFA, Folks. Not a merit badge. by Etherwalk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's an activity patch or some-such, not an actual merit badge. The difference? It doesn't mean anything in terms of advancement, it's just a patch. Sure, some people will do it anyway, since it's easy. Some troops might run programs in it, either because it's a boy scout program that's relatively easy to put together and fun to do (A movie studio, remember?), or because they actually believe what it's teaching. But it's not a merit badge. It doesn't go on the merit badge sash (not that scouts wear those much,) and it doesn't count towards Eagle, or any other rank.

    The distinction may sound trivial on slashdot, but it's nontrivial within the organization. Even among merit badges, some are easy and some are hard. Some are more respected than others. An activity patch for knowing what copyright infringement is? It's not even going to register on the status board. Maybe some kids will get to see a movie studio, but that's okay.

    As to all the comments about Boy Scouts not being what it used to be--that's true, in some ways. A lot of things have changed, in Boy Scouts and in American culture. That's not all bad. Some is, and some isn't. The thing that influences the program most is the quality, not only of the youths who become leaders in the program, but of the adult volunteers that make it happen and show them how to lead. Two troops in the same town, with members of the same socioeconomic background, can be as different as night and day because they have different leaders. Don't sit on your rear and say what a bad program it is--fix it. A good troop can change the lives of a lot of boys, in a good way.

    Of course there are politics, and there have been major disagreements about what values the Boy Scouts should be instilling. They argue that there is a God--whatever name you may call him by--and that it is immoral to embrace a gay lifestyle. Every scout takes an oath to do his duty "to God and his country," and promises to keep himself "morally straight." Maybe you agree with the policies and maybe you don't, but as an organization, the Boy Scouts of America has the right to say "this is what we want to teach." They're not preaching hate--but they are saying that they believe some things are wrong. They don't ask you if you're gay, ever--but if you come out as gay, in some councils at least, you're out of the organization. They have their beliefs, and they stick to them. I don't like some of those beliefs, but I believe they have the right to stick to them.

    There are other organizations that are smaller, that are more inclusive, as an alternative. It's an imperfect world. Not everyone is tolerant. The Boy Scouts aren't tolerant of open gays, and a lot of others are intolerant towards the Boy Scouts because of that intolerance. Intolerance breeds intolerance. But we still each should have the right the choose what we believe is right, and what we believe is wrong. That the BSA does a lot of good doesn't absolve them of responsibility for their intolerance, but it does seem to increase the relative depth of the hypocracy of the BSA's critics.

    I remember talking with a friend of mine. We were part of a much larger group of college friends who had "camped" out in a cabin in the woods one night, singing late into the night whatever random songs we all knew and telling ghost stories (Sam McGee) and the like. And my friend was glad because of how much he enjoyed the experience and yet sad because he didn't expect he'd ever have one like it again. In part, I think, because he wasn't an overly woodsy type, but also because he was gay. Now most boy scouts can't sing half so well as that group (one or three of us excluded,) but still, much of the night was beautiful. It is a terrible crime that they should deny him that experience. There's no two ways about that. (One could move the agency if one wished; but at best it is shared.)

    But if we were intolerant of their intolerance... where does it end? It is possible for men of good conscience to disagree, ev

  185. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    merit badges have long been replaced by achievements on the xbox 360.

  186. That reminds me. by jd · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing once about a prominant scout leader who was a homosexual. What was his name... oh, that's it! Lord Baden Powell, founder of the Scout and Boy Scout movements. (He was also a British spy, which would imply a certain disregard for the opinions of those whose information he stole.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:That reminds me. by swillden · · Score: 1

      Not that it really affects the discussion, but what's your source for your claim that Baden Powell was gay? I googled it a bit, and all I can find is that some biographers suspect that he may have been -- apparently mainly based on his interest in working with boys.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  187. They should sue by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

    It makes sense. I've known for years that the BSA is the scouts. Now there's some BS (not Boy Scouts) group stealing their intellectual property abbreviation. I have actually heard a radio ad for the BSA trying to get people to only use purchased software in their business, and I seriously had to think about the BSA abbreviation. I remember thinking why would the Scouts be pushing for legal software use. If we live in a world where the World Wrestling Federation loses to the World Wildlife Fund because people might confuse the two, then we live in a world where the Scouts need to sue a company who is "championing" copyright law and actually saying "BSA" in their promotions.

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
  188. You don't have anything to worry about by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I won't get concerned until the "Respect for Intellectual Property" badge becomes Eagle-required. At which point I'll personally go down to headquarters and find out what the hell's going on, and tell them to get back to their proper (ie, founding) values. Scout's Honor."

    The article and the summary are from completely different worlds. The thing is a patch that can be earned in the Los Angeles area. There's a museum centered on biology here that offers a patch for visiting. It's not a merit badge. The last paragraph of the article specifically spells that out. The "insightful" submitter put together an amazing summary that makes it seem like this is a nationwide BSA merit badge while it is not a merit badge at all. You've got to love slashdot.

    Congrats on the Eagle. I'm a fellow 1%er.

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    1. Re:You don't have anything to worry about by trumpetboy8282 · · Score: 1

      Congrats on Eagle as well, though the letter I got from National said it was 2.5%.

      --
      This sig is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.
    2. Re:You don't have anything to worry about by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      Congrats on the Eagle. I'm a fellow 1%er.

      Dood, where I come from, a '1%er' is an outlaw biker, the kind that the AMA used to talk about when they said that 99% of all motorcycle riders were law abiding citizens, courteous, yada yada yada, it was the '1%' that were the hell raising law breaking hooligans of screen and street and screwed it up for the other 99%. Kinda like the 99% of whackjob weasel l*wy*rs screwin it up for the other 1%.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:You don't have anything to worry about by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1
      I won't get concerned until the "Respect for Intellectual Property" badge becomes Eagle-required. At which point I'll personally go down to headquarters and find out what the hell's going on, and tell them to get back to their proper (ie, founding) values.
      According to what I read on scout law, this isn't a problem. Look at number 2:

      A Scout is Loyal to the King and to his officers, and to his country, and to his employers.
      and number 10:

      10. A Scout is clean in thought, word and deed.
      Number 2 implies adherence to law (loyalty to country and officers), while number 10 implies adherence to moral code. Moral code, since unspecified, can only be assumed to be the law (the only moral code extensively documented and that applies to an entire country). Basically, scouts promote legal activities. And copyright infringement is certainly not that.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    4. Re:You don't have anything to worry about by (CS)Entrail+Blazer · · Score: 1

      Those Scout Laws are so 1908. For the record the current US Scout Laws and interpretations are:

      TRUSTWORTHY
      A Scout tells the truth. He keeps his promises. Honesty is part of his code of conduct. People can depend on him.
      LOYAL
      A Scout is true to his family, Scout leaders, friends, school, and nation.
      HELPFUL
      A Scout is concerned about other people. He does things willingly for others without pay or reward.
      FRIENDLY
      A Scout is a friend to all. He is a brother to other Scouts. He seeks to understand others. He respects those with ideas and customs other than his own.
      COURTEOUS
      A Scout is polite to everyone regardless of age or position. He knows good manners make it easier for people to get along together.
      KIND
      A Scout understands there is strength in being gentle. He treats others as he wants to be treated. He does not hurt or kill harmless things without reason.
      OBEDIENT
      A Scout follows the rules of his family, school, and troop. He obeys the laws of his community and country. If he thinks these rules and laws are unfair, he tries to have them changed in an orderly manner rather than disobey them.
      CHEERFUL
      A Scout looks for the bright side of things. He cheerfully does tasks that come his way. He tries to make others happy.
      THRIFTY
      A Scout works to pay his way and to help others. He saves for unforeseen needs. He protects and conserves natural resources. He carefully uses time and property.
      BRAVE
      A Scout can face danger even if he is afraid. He has the courage to stand for what he thinks is right even if others laugh at or threaten him.
      CLEAN
      A Scout keeps his body and mind fit and clean. He goes around with those who believe in living by these same ideals. He helps keep his home and community clean.
      REVERENT
      A Scout is reverent toward God. He is faithful in his religious duties. He respects the beliefs of others.

  189. cynicism (No honest man can call Bush a christian) by perler · · Score: 1
    I've been through it in training, so I know exactly what it's like. I still don't consider it torture. This is the same mentality that tells us it's wrong to occasionally discipline a child physically, or to eat meat because "it's cruel to the wiffle cows".

    this just makes me wonder if you get taught cynicism or to forget humanity in "training".

    what training do you talking about anyway? us army? and you americans really wonder what the world is thinking about you? detaining foreigners without trail (yes, that's a pun), without even knowing why and how long they will be detained comparing with educating children is so brainwashed that i think you should get back to the front lines really soon. PAT

  190. In addition to the badges for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... not being gay ... not being an atheist
    now we have one for:
    Not thinking for yourself.

  191. I didn't realize that ignorance was a defense by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

    Can I claim the same defense when I shoot someone? "Honest, your honor, I had no idea that shooting someone in the head was going to kill them!" There is something like basic common sense when talking about things. Bush veered long ago into sheer phantasy.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  192. Badge Requirements by ShimmyShimmy · · Score: 1

    "Boy Scout Merit Badge Requirements"

    Give four different uses of computers.
    Well thats easy: Games, porn, mp3s, and an occasional paper.

    --
    Partial Credit: The Engineer's Best friend
    "Well, the bridge didn't fall all the way down!"
  193. Now i'm confused.. by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    "They are professionals at getting people to bend over..."

    Did you mean RIAA or the gays?

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  194. Merit badge for quitting :P by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Methinks they should give them a merit badge for finally realizing how utterly broken and obsolete the scouts system is and leaving to tackle the world, sans-organization, with their buddies the same way everyone else does nowadays. Pre-teens are better at Google and Wikipedia research than most adults because they have the time, drive and creativity to pursue their desires. They can't afford the music they want, or their well-meaning half-bred suburban parents refuse to buy the (C)rap albums, so the kids go online and get it for free.

    If modern kids really cared about their education (which they don't), and really wanted to know about the world around them (which, except for hip-hop culture, shitty drugs and fast-food sex, they don't), they could easily tap into the wealth of resources at their fingertips and become exemplary specimens of humanity (when hell freezes over). Boy/girl scouts is an old-world holdover that just can't provide the rapid-fire learning that's required in today's ever-increasingly hectic life. Evolve or die, I say.

    Thank god I don't have kids!

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  195. Supreme Irony by ubuwalker31 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen this horrendous monstrosity of a merit patch?

    http://news.yahoo.com/photo/061020/482/ab8ead627ff 249e09c02fa52fd23ca7f;_ylt=AklJWOIUKoALP8zRQt9NixJ H2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA3bGk2OHYzBHNlYwN0bXA

    And I wonder if the supreme irony behind this "Respect Copyrights" merit patch is that it uses the Boy Scout Logo with an eagle and Trifoil, which is trademarked by the Boy Scouts of America! Check out http://www.scouting.org/identity/contents/11.html and http://www.scouting.org/identity/contents/1.html . The Boy Scouts should sue the MPAA for trademark violations! O the irony!

  196. Re:RTFA, Folks. Not a merit badge. by Bolak · · Score: 1

    In addition, this isnt even a patch for all of BSA, it is for the LA area only. The patch is for a small, limited number of boys(52,000), many of whose families work in the movie industry in some way. This does not reflect on the BSA at all. Its not a nationally recognized award, just a local council thing.

  197. oh brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the headline again: "Boy Scouts Introduce Merit Badge For Not Pirating".

    You know...if Podunk, America issued a citation of appreciation for being gay Slashdot would announce it with a title similar to "America Introduces Legislation For Being Gay".

    Folks:
        A) It was not the Boy Scouts. It was a Los Angeles faction there-of. Movies=LA. Wow. what a shock.
        B) It was not a Merit Badge. A patch is quite different. Not approved on the national level.

    Let's get back to better smut what say you. ;-)

  198. Re:cynicism (No honest man can call Bush a christi by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    "and you americans really wonder what the world is thinking about you?" I'm not American, but I know exactly what the world thinks of them. Doesn't make a difference. Most of the world hates Jews too, doesn't mean it's right. "detaining foreigners without trail (yes, that's a pun), without even knowing why and how long they will be detained comparing with educating children is so brainwashed that i think you should get back to the front lines really soon." Well, we can just execute them instead, since International Law doesn't forbid that. Would you like that better? You just let me know, "perler", and I'll see what I can do. It'd probably work better anyway since Europe is right now refusing to take back the Gitmo prisoners who were captured in the EU. Since you guys don't want them back, and you don't want the US holding them, guess we'll just finish 'em off. That alright with you, Perler? As far as the Education system goes, I've seen what Europe churns out, and I'm not impressed. When a large segment of your population can buy into the "9/11 was an inside job myth", I think all that money spent on schooling is probably wasted.

  199. are the antics of Foley representative of by alizard · · Score: 1

    Boy Scouting?

    This shows Foley as a Scoutmaster. This isn't available on the current "Fact Sheet" because unaccountably, it was purged of Foley's name right after Foley became notorious for his interest in children. Surely a coincidence.

    I'm not sure that a youth organization that on a single campout, loses 4 dead to adult carelessness and 300 heat-related injuries in the course of having kids wait for President Bush to make a political appearance really is a place where any responsible adult would want to put a kid. The carelessness was setting up a giant tent with a metal pole right under high-tension power lines. You want to trust people like that with kids?

    Throw in the RIAA Merit Badge and. . . we have an organization that deserves no public support of any sort. They served a useful purpose in the past, too bad they seem as an organization to have forgotten what it was.

  200. Non profit copies should be legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't steal movies or music, i only copy them without authorization. When no money is exchanged, why should this be illegal? Corporations have too much power in the USA; it is the government of corporations, by corporations, for corporations where everyone is a possible criminal and they want to force this thinking to the entire world which will not tolerate it anymore.

    Remember this: You can't steal what you can't touch. Their monopoly over knowledge and culture is over, the genie is already out of the bottle and can't go back no matter how hard they try to convince us otherwise. It doesn't matter how they label us, the majority of the people in the world agree and will keep making copies regardless. If their business models can't adapt to the new reality (which i doubt) then they deserve to disappear. Massification of technology has made past things obsolete and we should not allow laws trying to protect what is not needed anymore; specially when it benefits a minority over the majority.

    Sharing is a virtue, not a crime. They brainwashed people with their media of this unethic way of thinking and that is wrong, not us.

  201. The Computers MB pamphlet used to be even worse. by sirwired · · Score: 1

    Heh, you thought the Computers merit badge was bad when it used late-90's pamphlet. I am a Computer Engineer, and knew I wanted to be one since I was in the 4th grade and I never bothered to earn the Computers merit badge when I was a scout ('88-'95) because the badge was so stupid.

    The requirements at the time included such things as: "Visit a business that uses a computer". Even at the time, that was pretty dumb.

    I remember one of the illustrations was trying to explain how a hard drive worked. I remember it making absolutely no sense. I found out, through reading a book on the history of early IBM computers (I work for Big Blue... big surprise), that the illustration came from a '60's-era IBM brochure on magnetic core memory. That crap hasn't been used since the '70's, but there it was in my 1990's merit badge pamphlet, inaccurately trying to talk about hard drives.

    SirWired

  202. Punishment is due. by FatSean · · Score: 0, Troll

    The fat tubs of shit who voted for a war-mongering drunkard started the ball rolling. Many intelligent people were warning about Bush, his ties to industry, and his political ties to freaks who want to re-make the USA as an Imperial power of sorts.

    Bush voters were swayed by fears of gays marrying and of terrorists blowing up some red-necks dirt-farm in ass-rape Nebraska. They failed to use their intelligence, and used their emotions. They should pay for these poor decisions.

    --
    Blar.
  203. Here's the real question... by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 1

    How long before .pdf's of the merit badge booklet show up on P2P?

    --
    New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
  204. Why go through all the trouble earning it... by adamacus · · Score: 1

    ...when you can just make an illegal copy of your friend's badge!

  205. I have my pirate badge right here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a proud member of BSA and a proud pirate!
    http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/1606/emeraldbaypi rateawardcs6.jpg
    On a more serious note, I could care less about that merit badge.