Slashdot Mirror


Full Review of the iPhone 2 On Launch Day

With the launch of Apple's brand-spanking-new 3G iPhone today, Engadget has a great review of the product and many of the prominent features. The review has quite a few good pictures and is not shy about technical details, but I guess they would know a fair bit about it, having ripped one apart yesterday. "The wireless industry is a notoriously tough nut to crack, and it's become pretty clear that the first iPhone wasn't about total domination so much as priming the market and making a good first impression with some very dissatisfied cellphone users. With the iPhone 3G, though, Apple's playing for keeps. Not only is this iPhone's Exchange enterprise support aiming straight for the heart of the business market, but the long-awaited 3rd party application support and App Store means it's no longer just a device, but a viable computing platform. And its 3G network compatibility finally makes the iPhone welcome the world over, especially after Cupertino decided to ditch its non-traditional carrier partnerships in favor of dropping the handset price dramatically. $200? We're still a little stunned." Update 17:17 GMT by SM: The guys over at Engadget also pointed out that Apple is having some severe problems with their iTunes servers and many customer are being sent home without their sync complete for new iPhones.

420 comments

  1. More Expensive by lessthanjakejohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    It actually becomes $160 more expensive over the life of the contract.

    1. Re:More Expensive by Palshife · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Which, amazingly, includes this thing called "phone service."

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    2. Re:More Expensive by LandDolphin · · Score: 4, Informative

      He was refering to the raise in the cost of service for the new phone that will end up costing you $160 above what "phone service" used to cost you.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    3. Re:More Expensive by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't have to get a data plan do you? It is possible to get the phone for $200 and then use one of the bacis phone service plans, correct?

      Sure, that would be a waste fo an iPhone, but I could see a lot of people doing that so they can appear to be "hip" or "cool" with their iPhone while. But then again, I live near Scottsdale where a lot of people try to appear to have money when they don't.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    4. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not including texting charges, since these aren't included in this plan.

    5. Re:More Expensive by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm fairly certain at least with AT&T you're required to get a data plan and minimum voice plan with the iPhone purchase. Basically this is their solution for the unlockers. Force you into a plan at the store and charge you $200 + activation + 1 month of service if you break the plan.

    6. Re:More Expensive by EvanED · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't have to get a data plan do you? It is possible to get the phone for $200 and then use one of the bacis phone service plans, correct?

      No, you can't.

      Not even if you are buying a used iPhone from someone; you have to get the iPhone package. In fact I *just* closed the window I had with an AT&T support chat asking this question.

    7. Re:More Expensive by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1, Informative

      Palshife was probably referring to the fact that for the extra $160 you get nearly twice as much bandwidth (up to 3x) over the first iPhone.

    8. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, but you are getting more features and abilities.

      If I upgraded my car to a new one, it would cost more.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be a great deal if the $30/mo data plan wasn't required, but I don't think that is possible.

    10. Re:More Expensive by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Ahh,

      Then that really does make the complaint about the rise in the data plan even more valid.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    11. Re:More Expensive by svnt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He was refering to the raise in the cost of service for the new phone that will end up costing you $160 above what "phone service" used to cost you.

      Ok, 160/24 = $6.67 per month. Or a premium of 12% over your minimum plan with the EDGE iPhone.

      Your data rate increases by (absolute worst case) a factor of three, even while moving at highway speeds (3G > EDGE). Standing still it's four to ten times as fast. I fail to see how it's a bad deal.

    12. Re:More Expensive by Bibz · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually this could be a good alternative to the iPod Touch since the iPhone is much less expensive (100$ or 200$ ?) then the same size iPod touch.

      --
      I didn't found something funny to put here.
    13. Re:More Expensive by Tyketto · · Score: 3, Informative

      It actually becomes $160 more expensive over the life of the contract.

      This is variable.

      I say that because through various resources (job, college, etc.) you could qualify for corporate, IRU, or FAN discounts (at least in the US). For example, the FAN discount I have from working at the Univ. of Nevada gives me a 15% discount on the phone plan (the cost of the data plan is included in the service now), 20% discount on any accessories bought at ATT, and any upgrade fees waived)[1].

      Discounts vary from company to company and entity to entity, so the best bet would be to see if you qualify for one. the URL below will help you:

      http://www.wireless.att.com/discounts

      BL.

      [1] personal email addresses won't work here. If it is with work or college or so, it should.

    14. Re:More Expensive by dmnic · · Score: 1

      you mean $40, for US users.

      lets assume the 8GB model:
      old version @ $399 with $20/month unlimited data
      new version @ $199 with $30/month unlimited data

      over 2 years (length of ATT contract), the extra $10/month you will pay in data fees is $240...of course the phone is $200 cheaper, so you will only pay out $40 extra over the 2 years than you would have with the older version.

      so, please tell me how this will be $160 more than the older version.
      thanks,

    15. Re:More Expensive by podperson · · Score: 1

      24*10 - 200 = $40.

      Oh, you're assuming $10/month for SMS too. But then you're saying 3G - EDGE is worth nothing, and iPhone 2.0's ability to run push messaging (so you can use AIM etc. instead of SMS) is also worth nothing.

      This reminds me of when Apple went from referring to monitor sizes by usable screen area to physical size (their 13" monitor became what everyone else called a 14" monitor, etc.) and everyone berated them for doing what everyone else had been doing and no-one had given them credit for.

      If everyone complained about the iPhone's price before because Apple didn't conceal it behind plan lockin BS, let's castigate them again for using the same plan lockin BS their rivals were ALREADY using.

    16. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are marketing it as cheaper, but actually screwing you. do you really think that's the same as looking at the sale price on a new car?

    17. Re:More Expensive by bonkeydcow · · Score: 1

      So you can use your phone to go to the att website and send a text message for free, but sending it from the phone costs money. Gotta love corporations.

    18. Re:More Expensive by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Text plan. Was included, now isn't. Yes, it's highway robbery, but that's the way they're doing it these days.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    19. Re:More Expensive by dmnic · · Score: 1

      texting is optional, not mandatory like the data plan is, therefore I didnt include it in the cost analysis.
      besides, the OP didnt mention texting in his analysis either...

    20. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm.

      Using "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line means, "backup file" where I come from. Vi much? :)

    21. Re:More Expensive by warrior · · Score: 5, Funny

      I live in the United States where a lot of people try to appear to have money when they don't.
       
      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    22. Re:More Expensive by dave420 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because it's fucking expensive when you compare it to other handsets and networks. The original iPhone was a *really* bad deal. This one is better value than the original, but still a shitty deal.

    23. Re:More Expensive by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where are these numbers coming from? In the US, the new iPhone data plan is $10 more per month than the previous and $5 more if you want the same amount of SMS you used to receive. ($10 + $5) * 24 mo = $360 more over the life of the contract. Or am I missing something?

      --
      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    24. Re:More Expensive by e4g4 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are - subtract the price difference between the new and old iPhone ($200) and voila you get $160.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    25. Re:More Expensive by von_rick · · Score: 1

      In my state, sales tax is 9%, which means the $399 phone will end up costing 436, while the $199 phone would be 217. Then applying the math discussed above, I would end up paying just $21 more than what I'd otherwise pay with older iPhone.

      That does not mean I will be buying one for myself :p

      --

      Face your daemons!

    26. Re:More Expensive by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Your welcome. Glad I could provide you with some level of enjoyment :-)

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    27. Re:More Expensive by 74nova · · Score: 1

      I've always assumed it's how the telecom companies help pay for selling you a blackberry or, in this case, an iPhone at a reasonable price. The make up for it with making you get a data plan. Not unreasonable, just the most likely reason they lock you into an expensive plan.

      Having said that, however, I've known people to weasel their way into data-less plans with really expensive phones for the same price as if they'd agreed to the data plan.

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    28. Re:More Expensive by EvanED · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always assumed it's how the telecom companies help pay for selling you a blackberry or, in this case, an iPhone at a reasonable price.

      But it's more than that... according to both the online rep I talked to and the guy in the store, you can't even sign up for a non-data plan if you get the iPhone from someone else and AT&T isn't subsidizing it.

    29. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple.iPhoneRelease.planB.execute();

      Error: java.lang.NullPointerException: planB

      Absolutely ridiculous.

    30. Re:More Expensive by knightri · · Score: 0

      Ummm. So if I buy the phone for 200, wait the 3 days, cancel my service and pay the 175, i will have an unlocked iphone for 375+activation?

      --
      'Or else pizza is going to order out for you'
    31. Re:More Expensive by 74nova · · Score: 1

      ew. that is worse...

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    32. Re:More Expensive by homesnatch · · Score: 1

      I believe you can switch your iPhone SIM card over to some dumb phone, adjust your plan to include unlimited data for dumb phones (costs less than unlimited data for smart phones)... and then put that SIM card back in the iPhone.

    33. Re:More Expensive by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, you could buy an old iPhone for $200 on eBay and you would be saving $360 over the cost of the new iPhone. Or, you could add $200 to the price considering I have to upgrade my current iPhone bringing the total to $560. Or, we could just agree to stop using fuzzy math and realize that the service plan costs $360 more over the life of the contract.

      --
      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    34. Re:More Expensive by bonehead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nope, not where I live. The nearest 3G to me is a 2 hour drive away, yet if I decide to upgrade my iPhone (which I may do anyway to get the GPS functionality), I still get to pay the higher rates.

      EDGE isn't actually that bad, for the most part, I notice bad javascript bogging down the cpu far more often than I notice the limited bandwidth. But it still kinda chaps my ass that I'll have to pay 3G prices for it.

    35. Re:More Expensive by Caldrak · · Score: 1

      Guess that's new with this version of the iPhone. My buddy got a new one with no issues from the states, brought it up here and unlocked it for use on the Rogers network. No issues, no extra fees.

    36. Re:More Expensive by hmar · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. You can't add service to one, and not the other. The total difference in cost of the service is $240 over 2 years. The new iphone is $300 cheaper than the old one. You can't add the cost of the service to the new one, and not the old one.

    37. Re:More Expensive by Garabito · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not even if you are buying a used iPhone from someone; you have to get the iPhone package.

      If you're buying an used iPhone from someone and you have already a contract with AT&T (or sign up with a dumb phone) nothing prevents you to put the AT&T SIM on the iPhone, no matter what the AT&T support drone tells you.

    38. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong, you *have* to buy the 69.99 all inclusive plan, or use another phone.

    39. Re:More Expensive by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      But if you got a new three g iphone, why would you not use the data plan? I'm not saying its a great deal or anything, it just seems to defeat the purpose of a smartphone to not get a data package.

    40. Re:More Expensive by warrior · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sweet! After 10 years of perfect karma I finally got modded Flamebait. As a lifetime (so far) resident of the US I think I'm in a position to hold the opinion that wanting to be a rock star is an epidemic in this country and not just limited to Scottsdale (although having been to Scottsdale I agree the infection rate may be higher there).

      --
      Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    41. Re:More Expensive by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      It's only less expensive if you somehow have someone paying for the required minimum 30 dollar data plan and 450 minutes voice plan.

    42. Re:More Expensive by CmdrPorno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Your data rate increases by (absolute worst case) a factor of three..."

      No, the worst case is if you live in a non-3G area, and your data rate increases by nothing, but you still have to pay for the 3G plan.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    43. Re:More Expensive by 3dr · · Score: 1

      But with an IM client you don't need a text plan, so this cost is irrelevant. And the data plan is unlimited.

    44. Re:More Expensive by Fulg · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe you can switch your iPhone SIM card over to some dumb phone, adjust your plan to include unlimited data for dumb phones (costs less than unlimited data for smart phones)... and then put that SIM card back in the iPhone.

      A word of warning to anyone wanting to try...

      For Rogers in Canada, the "cheap data plans for generic phones" (say the $7 all-you-can-leech instead of the "big" plan for iPhone) is locked to the IMEI number of your phone. The carrier has a list of IMEIs of all the phones it sold to subscribers.

      When you power up a phone with a SIM card inside, the IMEI is transmitted to the carrier. If the IMEI is unknown (your phone is "unapproved") the cheap data plan is not in effect, and you pay through the nose.

      This is all in the fine print that no one reads, though not that explicitly :)

      --
      gcc: no input sig
    45. Re:More Expensive by Bibz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if you are looking for a normal cell (not with the huge bandwidth and cost, which the parent was referring to), this could be a viable option if you can have it with a "normal" cell plan. You would get a normal cell combined an iPod touch for less. (Not to mention the smugness of it all.)

      --
      I didn't found something funny to put here.
    46. Re:More Expensive by illumin8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because it's fucking expensive when you compare it to other handsets and networks. The original iPhone was a *really* bad deal. This one is better value than the original, but still a shitty deal.

      It's the exact same price as any other 3G data plan that AT&T offers, ala Crackberry or Treo, but don't let that stop you from bashing Apple.

      I'm not saying it's a good deal. I think all the 3G data plans are overpriced right now, regardless of carrier, but that's what you have to pay if you want to be an early adopter. Me? I'm happy with my 1 year old iPhone that works just as well on wifi as the brand new 3G model.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    47. Re:More Expensive by LandDolphin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If I could have mod'ed you, I would have choosen "Funny" and it appears others agree.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    48. Re:More Expensive by EvanED · · Score: 1

      1. I would get a smaller data plan, probably $5 or $10 instead of $20.
      2. It still has wi-fi, and is an ipod.

    49. Re:More Expensive by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Not even if you are buying a used iPhone from someone; you have to get the iPhone package. In fact I *just* closed the window I had with an AT&T support chat asking this question.

      That's too bad. I have WIFI at home and work and I'm seldom more than a couple blocks away from free WIFI at a coffee shop. It'd be much cheaper if I could get the phone without a data plan (possibly even blocking all non-WIFI-data access) and pay $30 a month less for it.

    50. Re:More Expensive by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't worry about it too much. There's a boatload of idiots with mod points who subscribe to the idea that "If I don't explicitly recognize it as humor, be it due to it being over my head or my own faulty nonexistant sense of humor, then it must, logically, be flamebait."

      (But "Ha!" the modder thinks to himself, "I can mod this one down as offtopic, since it has nothing to do with the iPhone (to the best of my understanding). I'm going to ignore the fact that it's germane to the post it responds to, and just take away his karma.")

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    51. Re:More Expensive by avk77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most carriers cheat that way. My carrier is Sprint. Recently I walked into a Sprint store and the sales rep told me that there was NO way I can buy a Palm Centro phone without a data plan. I walked out of the store, walked into Worst Buy and the sales man sold me a Palm Centro with out a data plan 15 minutes later on the Sprint network. Either Sprint changed its policy in that 15 min window or the sales man at the Sprint store lied outright. You pick the most plausible reason.

    52. Re:More Expensive by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      You can't get a smaller data plan, the 30 dollar per month one is required. Point is, unless you already wanted those things, it really isn't cheaper than a ipod touch.

    53. Re:More Expensive by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      But you still gave positive reinforcement to Sprint by buying a product of theirs. You could have bought a phone that didn't work on Sprint instead... (and hopefully sent a letter to Sprint telling them why you didn't buy their product).

    54. Re:More Expensive by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      Well, technically you can just unlock it, and use it with whatever sim and whatever plan you want. I have AT&T and i STILL never activated my original iphone through them because i already had a perfectly good plan. Just downloaded some unlocking software and popped my existing sim in!
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    55. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If I remember correctly, the corporate/student discount do _not_ apply to the iPhone packages. At least they certainly did not apply to the 1st generation iPhones.

    56. Re:More Expensive by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Since you are person #2 to point this out, using this language, this early in the comments, I'll take this opportunity to tell you that you don't 'have' to do any such thing. No one makes you buy the phone in the first place.

      I don't live in a 3G area either, EDGE barely works out here, but I had an EDGE iPhone gifted to me. And even though that stuck me with a data plan I could only use when I traveled, the phone itself has turned out to be well worth it. When the 2.0 firmware jailbreak comes out, and iXbal gets ported to it, I may well buy the new one. What I don't expect I'll do is come on Slashdot and claim someone is making me pay for a 3G plan I can't use because, obviously, I am free to either choose to buy the phone and pay for the plan or make due with some other phone.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    57. Re:More Expensive by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      The 2.0 part is the firmware. People with EDGE iPhones who upgrade to the 2.0 firmware get push, location awareness for Google Maps and the camera and wherever else they wove it in, searchable contacts, App store....blah blah.

      Essentially everything but 3G and a black case back.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    58. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't buy it. I like the look of the new Lamborghini, but I wouldn't buy one if I had to drive on dirt roads.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    59. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wanting to be a rock star is an epidemic in this country

      I live in the US and I am a rockstar you insensitive clod!

    60. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      no it wasn't a bad deal. It just depends where your value is at.
      IS there a comparable 3g service plan that's cheaper?
      No? STFU.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    61. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Incorrect

      I have good news, if you live in an area with zero 3g, they'll give you 10 times your your 3g coverage.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    62. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Assuming your not just moving the new iPhone onto your existing iPhone plan. In which case the price for service doesn't go up at all.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    63. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I would send a letter to Sprint complaining very loudly about the lying SOB in their store., I also would have gone back and told the sales guy a thing or two.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    64. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I live on the planet earth where a lot of people try to appear to have money when they don't.

      There, fixed that for you.

      It's not really just an USA thing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    65. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Amateur.
      In the old days, My friends and I would create new account and race to 50,and then back down to zero.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    66. Re:More Expensive by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Huh, You have to already have an AT&T mobile number to see if you get a discount.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    67. Re:More Expensive by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Thanks Fulg, I almost bought one.

    68. Re:More Expensive by firewood · · Score: 1

      It actually becomes $160 more expensive over the life of the contract.

      Not if you include interest rates and projected inflation. Money has time value. It's worth more in your pocket now except in rare deflationary periods.

    69. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By jailbreak you mean, when they find another giant hole in the apple firmware? Lol...

      Damn apple just cant seem to write some decent software for a fricking phone. Also isnt that based on OSX? /laugh

      Yawn.. and when are they going to add a freaking backspace key. That shit is getting old.

      This is Fanboy
      |
      | (I have a hotter girlfriend, have a better job than you
      | (own a bigger house and have a bigger dick. There. I'm the alpha
      | (male. Time for my afternoon frolic with some female swimsuit
      | ( models.... Although I'm sure some sneaky bastard will find a | ( way to turn the tables :( Doesnt matter, I'm still the winner.
      |
      v

    70. Re:More Expensive by mysidia · · Score: 1

      So tweak the phone's hardware and replace the IMEI chip with one that will report the IMEI number of the "generic" phone that your wireless provider knows about??

    71. Re:More Expensive by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0, Troll

      I thought that male fanbois tended to have boyfriends rather than girlfriends.

    72. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your data rate increases by (absolute worst case) a factor of three, even while moving at highway speeds (3G > EDGE). Standing still it's four to ten times as fast. I fail to see how it's a bad deal.

      That's if you actually have 3G. AT&T's 3G coverage is abysmal. Most people will be paying more for the same EDGE speed.

    73. Re:More Expensive by Tintivilus · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's the exact same price as any other 3G data plan that AT&T offers, ala Crackberry or Treo, but don't let that stop you from bashing Apple.

      It's not the 3G that's expensive, it's the "smart phone" premium. The $15 featurephone ("MEdia Net") unlimited data plan works perfectly fine on 3G but AT&T has decided to charge more for devices with a touchscreen or qwerty keyboard. Nothing keeping you from pulling the SIM out of your free-after-rebate phone and popping it into your unlocked N95 but the terms of service.

      The great thing about the first iPhone was that they'd let you use the normal cheap data plan with a "smart" phone. Now that they found out people really want iPhones they jacked up the plan prices back in line with competing products.

    74. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. Do you have a brown nose? Does it stink of jobs' ass? Then yes.

    75. Re:More Expensive by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      IMEI changes are not unusual in my Asian part of the world. I'm sure it can be done on the iPhone if someone feels the need to scratch that particular itch bad enough.

    76. Re:More Expensive by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      but don't let that stop you from bashing Apple.

      You know what I don't get? How the iPhone 2 comes out of the gate, doesn't work for set-up, people get sent home to set it up on iTunes - doesn't work and no one on /. is saying squat about the crappy execution.

      Is Apple so holier-than-thou to this site that it walks scot-free on such a huge cock-up? If Microsoft released a product and the only thing wrong was the color of the GUI, you would've roasted them by now. Even Linux distros get more criticized!

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    77. Re:More Expensive by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Because if you bring logic and reason into the discussion, the whining is even more pitiful than it already is.

    78. Re:More Expensive by vux984 · · Score: 1

      . Recently I walked into a Sprint store and the sales rep told me that there was NO way I can buy a Palm Centro phone without a data plan.

      I can't speak to your specific situation, but I can tell you that sometimes the rules are different for multi-carrier vendors like best buy vs carrier-specific vendors like the 'sprint store'.

      It may well be that there was no way -he- could sell you a palm without data. It may be against Sprint policy. It may even be blocked in the computer systems he uses to activate product.

      It may well be that he honestly didn't know best buy could.

      It also may well be that the guy at best buy broke the rules, and wasn't supposed to sell you a palm without data; it may be that the computer systems BB uses are different, and his computer let him do it so he did it.

      Perhaps, in this scenario, the fact that he broke the rules will result in the carrier 'punishing' best buy by denying the residuals or some sort of subsidy clawback on that activation and since best buy employees are hourly paid that doesn't really affect them, so they don't really care... or maybe you bought the extended warranty, and best buy is willing to eat the carrier penalty to make a sale with extended warranty...or maybe it will get tracked back to him and he'll be bawled out by some management flunky later on...

      Just saying... there are a lot more possibilities than you've accounted for.

    79. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't actually know what an IMEI is, do you?

    80. Re:More Expensive by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      Er, and GPS, improved audio quality, improved wifi reception, etc.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    81. Re:More Expensive by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 1

      Jealous much? Now get back to your mud hut :P

    82. Re:More Expensive by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      can you reactivate someone else's old iphone?

    83. Re:More Expensive by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I suspect that's because it was included free in the original iPhone plan. They were trying to compare apples to apples.

      At the end of the day, the cost delta isn't huge, and if the iPhone tweaks your motor it's still a good deal.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    84. Re:More Expensive by Moofie · · Score: 1

      ..assuming that the person you want to communicate with also has an IM client in their pocket, yes. Since that's not always a good assumption, no.

      I never understood texting until I got a phone with a full keyboard. Now, I use it as a less-intrusive-than-a-phonecall but more-immediate-than-an-email option. It's obscene how much it costs, but for me it's awful convenient.

      YMMV.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    85. Re:More Expensive by wye43 · · Score: 1

      3G is not early adopting. 3G is old as hell. Seriously. At least in Europe it is. :)

    86. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at the rate the US is going, by the time the contract is up $360 won't buy a package of toilet paper.

    87. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I don't get? How the iPhone 2 comes out of the gate, AT&T's overloaded servers prevent Apple & AT&T stores from setting up customer phones in store, so people get sent home with a one-day "we're holding an iPhone for you" card instead of a phone, and nobody on /. is blaming AT&T.

      Registration isn't handled by Apple's servers, it's all handled by AT&T servers. That's why iTunes activation doesn't work - AT&T took product activation out of Apple's hands.

      Is /. so holier-than-thou that they can't even assign blame properly when a huge cock-up happens?

    88. Re:More Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was implicit in the above post that one who *voluntarily chooses* to buy an iPhone 3G is then forced to buy the 3G data plan, regardless of whether they have 3G access. No one is forcing you to inhale air, either.

      Cf. http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/false-dilemma.html

      Congratulations! You've committed one of the same logical fallacies that Holocaust deniers commit. Your parents must be very proud!

  2. Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by Andruil · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend of mine works for a company selling the iPhone 2. According to him if you lose your iPhone 2 you will 1. Have to pay full price to get a new one (not too surprising imo) and 2. Re-sign up for a 2 year contract... Also according to him the employees have been instructed specifically to not mention this fact to customers. Pretty screwy to me. Then again I am ignorant of how most cell phones work so I don't know if this is standard or not. I'm assuming based on his reaction its not.

  3. finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This thing is catching up to the features already available on my BB.

    1. Re:finally! by k_187 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      SRSLY, you can have my Crackberry when you pry it from my cold dead hands (so hey, free phone when I kick the bucket).

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fanboi moderator attack detected!!!

      Its so true, but will be marked as troll in 3...2...1

    3. Re:finally! by mrdoogee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I could type on an iPhone without looking at the keys, like I can on my BB, I'd get one. But while the touchscreen is cool, I like to be able to 2 thumb type and know where the keys are without looking. Plus I have dropped my BB repeatedly and except for the case showing some scratches, everything still works a-ok.

    4. Re:finally! by MattW · · Score: 1

      Catching, or caught? And it was already ahead in many areas.

    5. Re:finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like ripping off users, right?

    6. Re:finally! by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wouldn't play the durability card against the iPhone. If we want to go anecdotes, mine fell down a flight of stairs (full drop, no bouncing) screen first and you can't tell. No scratches.

      However, if you would like something a little more formal: http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/iphone-review.ars/13

    7. Re:finally! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So you think your iPhone is tough... I think not...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re:finally! by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

      I saw that movie, too.

      The departed, I mean. Amazing movie. And texting without looking at the phone is a survival skill there. If you need it, you need it.

      However to me that ugly keyboard just takes away screen realstate that could be better used for a web page, or even better, a book. I read a lot of books in my phone (not an iPhone).

      Keyboard for you, screen size for me.

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  4. quick, someone start complaining! by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's more expensive over the life of the contract than the previous model!
    It's not just a plain cell phone!
    It doesn't run Linux!

    1. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Lane.exe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, computer servers don't have the ability to handle lots of traffic at once! Kids listen to music too loud! Movies don't make sense anymore! You have to sign up for a contract!

      --
      IAALS.
    2. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      LOUD NOISES.

    3. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get off my yard!

    4. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by RabidMoose · · Score: 5, Funny

      Things cost more than they used to! Young people swear!

    5. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by LandDolphin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "You have to sign up for a contract!"

      I think that's a pretty valid complaint. Being locked into a contract lowers the companies desire to offer decent customer service when compared to how they would want to treat you if you could just switch providers whith a phone call.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    6. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by clbyjack81 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Things cost more than they used to! Young people swear!

      Do you want a popsicle?

      --
      Cole's Axiom: The sum of the intelligence on the planet is a constant. The population is growing.
    7. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      It doesn't do my taxes!
      It keeps stealing my aluminum foil!
      It won't get off my lawn!

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    8. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 4, Funny

      As someone said somewhere - "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again."

    9. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Lane.exe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, that's why they make you sign them. If you could just switch providers with a phone call, there'd be little incentive for the companies to offer you any kind of package deal. They'd charge per use of the network. But contracts are bargained for, so you don't have to enter in to it. I have a hard time feeling sorry for people who don't want to sign contracts with people that are going to provide services to you. If you don't like the terms, attempt to change them. If they don't, don't buy. And if you do get in to one, especially a cell phone contract, you can always find a way to get out of it without paying a termination fee. There are lots of grounds for rescission or reformation of the contract, most of which are understandable by the non-lawyer populace.

      --
      IAALS.
    10. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Lucky for people that don't want to sign a contract for cell phone service, there are companies that offer celluar service cheaper with no contract.

      http://www.mycricket.com/

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    11. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Captain+Spam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not just a plain cell phone!

      Y'know, that used to be one of my complaints about ridiculous phones like these. I always said that the durn thing should make phone calls, and that should be the primary functionality of it. Plain and simple.

      But then I realized that nobody wants to call me anyway, so maybe what I want really IS a portable computing platform that just happens to have a cell phone buried in it somewhere just in case. :-)

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    12. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I salute you, good sir, for defying the caps filter.

    13. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maaaaaaaatlooooooocckk.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    14. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Otter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We're talking about iPhones. The grievance is that things cost **less** than they used to!

    15. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by PlatyPaul · · Score: 4, Funny

      Video

      Worth a chuckle at least.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    16. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the terms, attempt to change them. If they don't, don't buy. And if you do get in to one, especially a cell phone contract, you can always find a way to get out of it without paying a termination fee.

      Have you ever gotten contract phone service in the US before? 1) you can't negotiate terms, 2) there is no carrier (that I'm aware of) that will break the contract without requiring a termination fee, unless you're ending the contract to go into another one with the same carrier.

      Deine Mutter ist eine Schlampe.

    17. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ** Endorses and supports Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) technology.

      ** Exposes your whereabouts and provides ways for others to track you without your knowledge.

      ** Won't play patent and DRM-free formats like Ogg.

      ** Not the only option. There are better alternatives on the horizon that respect your freedom, don't spy on you, play free media formats, and let you use free software -- like the FreeRunner.

    18. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by bonkeydcow · · Score: 1

      Also, computer servers don't have the ability to handle lots of traffic at once! Kids listen to music too loud! Movies don't make sense anymore! You have to sign up for a contract!

      Young people use curse words!

    19. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by theantipop · · Score: 3, Funny
      The last comment on that video, god bless Youtube.

      911wasplanned14 (18 hours ago) Show Hide

      Well here is our president, isent it wonderful. No wonder he was in the 9.11 crap and other things. look, this is how it goes, we went to war with iraq, we distroyed them. now were trying to help iraq for something HE did. There is no iran necular weapon. there is nothing. iran and iraq are nothing to us. so god bless them. and may they find safty soon. watch ppl, next will be Saudia Arabia. watch. and. see. god bless you all, and beleive in god+christ, cuz thr the only true people left. bye...

    20. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by 74nova · · Score: 1

      I seriously wish there was a +6 funny just for this post

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    21. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is that it runs BSD. :)

    22. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      1) you can't negotiate terms

      I have negotiated terms. You have the most power when your original contract is about to end and they want you to stay. Work them over hard enough and you can get a nice free phone and lots of free incentives to sign another contract.

    23. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Caboosian · · Score: 0

      Your social security check is late!

    24. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then I realized that nobody wants to call me anyway...

      Now you can use your iPhone's web interface and Facebook/MySpace to make friends who can call you.

    25. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It doesn't run Linux!

      No, but it does run Unix. Close enough?

    26. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by girasquid · · Score: 1

      Just get a EEE with Skype - that's what I did. :)

    27. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Tyketto · · Score: 5, Informative

      Simple solution.

      Purchase the unsubsidized phone. Apple is selling the phone outright for $399 (8G) and $499 (16G) without the contract. If you don't want the contract, or are unable to upgrade your phone with them at this time, you can still buy the iPhone outright.

      BL.

    28. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just a plain cell phone!

      I used to wish we had this option. I went through it again when Dad finally got a cell a few years ago. It was all he wanted, and since he was approaching 80, fair enough. He got as simple as he could find, which around here just means sans camera.

      Last year he asked if there was something like an electronic notepad he could get these days. Something to keep track of all the doctor appointments he was starting to deal with, and to help remember what people said when he was out. He essentially described the original Palm.

      So I gave him a run-down on everything available, from Hipster PDA through Blackberry, and asked if his phone didn't have any note ability as well. Couple of months later he mentioned he didn't find anything that seemed useful that wasn't silly expensive. I asked what was wrong with using the phone. "Oh yeah... Hang on." Yup, he read the manual, found out what it really did, and quite likes his useful little PDA. Thinks it's great and "everyone should have one."

    29. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Better yet, I actually saw criticism of the iPhone 2.0 today because it doesn't connect to digital tv sources in Japan. Uh....ok? Good thing Austin isn't in Japan?

    30. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 4, Funny
    31. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I normally despise Christians as much as the next intellectual, but comments like these make me thankful for religion. Can you imagine if this person was an *atheist*?

    32. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by HillBilly · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pfft.

      If the iPhone was release by another company such as SE or Nokia it would be called disappointing but because its apple its innovating.

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    33. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TACOS!

    34. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      That's still awfully expensive.

      Check out
      http://www.cellguru.net/prepaid_compare.htm

      (I actually have one of the _more_ expensive ones on there, and I pay $5/month for my cell phone.)

    35. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      While PrePaid phones are great for those that do not use them very often, I use my cell phone for all of my phone/texting communication. I tend to use it a lot, and would pay through the roof for prepaid; even at 7c a min.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    36. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Actually i hear that people have created iPhone apps for each of those... so no excuses!!!

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    37. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Please add the one where he tries to exit stage right but the door is locked.

      America's funniest president ever.

    38. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      And an even better thing that Apple is not in Austin. Otherwise I see a lot more Dell versus Apple deathmatches.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    39. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by hotfireball · · Score: 1

      It also can not pay by "electronic wallet" and show TV (in Japan).

    40. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apple is in Austin. The campus here focuses on iPhone/iTunes and customer service, I believe. I've applied so many times there as an Instructional Designer, I think I have a macro setup on my keyboard to send my resume...

    41. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      For those who don't get the above quote, here's the video where Bush says the above.

    42. Re:quick, someone start complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit! I can't believe I fell for that... you Asthole!

  5. The big news really is the 2.0 software by ericspinder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As an 1st generation iPhone owner, I'm excited about the new Software, which will enable all the new features save for GPS. Staying with edge support only will even save me $15 month (3G is $10 more and doesn't include the 200 messages I can already send). I'll likely upgrade with the next generation.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by QuantumRiff · · Score: 5, Interesting
      3G is $10 more and doesn't include the 200 messages I can already send

      Yeah, so why the hell is that? you can have unlimited data, sent at very fast rates, watch streaming video, check your mail, etc, but those little 140byte packets, sorry, those are $0.20 each...

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    2. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Gotung · · Score: 1

      I agree, if the 3G had capacities of 16 and 32 GB for the same prices I would be leaning towards the upgrade. As is I will stick with my 1st gen iPhone and wait for the next overhaul.

    3. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by LandDolphin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they can and people are willing to pay it. Wh

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    4. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by ericspinder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, so why the hell is that? those little 140byte packets, sorry, those are $0.20 each

      What's even worse, when I bought my first cell phone (one of the first digital phones), text messaging was free. Then they heard that people elsewhere were gladly paying 10 cents a message, go figure. I don't know the details for sure, but in terms of network usage it might cost them more for a ten minute phone call than a month of heavy text usage.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    5. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If I had unlimited internet access on my RAZR I could configure my phone to send MMS via internet and it would cost me nothing. I don't, though, so I spend $2.50/mo for 250 messages/mo (I've never come even close, I just want some padding. But that's just another way to get robbed. Thing is, if I get a shitload of MMS spam someday, it's also insurance.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by ceejayoz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I doubt SMS will be around much longer with proper messaging apps popping up all over the iPhone App Store.

    7. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey, leave him alone, willya?

      Its like you are asking somebody who is into BDSM about how he can let himself tied up, beaten and then raped in the ass. And while he has already gotten a 1st gen iphone and lusting for another one, do you think he would mind being ripped off by AT&T for mere $0.20 each message?

    8. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole point of SMS is that you can send to any phone that is why it is hard to get rid of

    9. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's called "stupidity tax".

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    10. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      Yes, good God, you can't really expect them to drop their six-thousand-percent markup can you? Think of the executives.

    11. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by MattW · · Score: 1

      I'm on a 3-person 3-iphone family plan, and we already had unlimited family text added. So We're going to drop from 3k minutes to 2100, leaving our monthly cost the same (we have 20k rollover minutes, so we sort of overestimated :D).

      But I would say - if I had a choice between 2.5g 1st-gen iphone with the apps, vs 3g without, it would be EDGE all the way. Apps ftw. I spent months without upgrading because I had jailbroken, and only fairly recently restored back with the app store coming.

    12. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only. Unfortunately, those apps can't run in the background...

    13. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      This is incorrect. Apple is setting up a push service to allow 'chat' type apps to run in the background. The application may close, but if you receive a push from the server of an incoming message it'll open up and you'll once again be chatting. To the user it'll appear as if the app is running in the background w/o the battery drain.

    14. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by linuxpng · · Score: 1

      Or I could log into aim from SMS with my 200 free messages and get 1) guaranteed delivery 2) get it real time (unless I'm out of range).

      The current AIM app on the iphone, frankly, blows. You have to leave the app open to get a notification that you have a message and when the phone sleeps it will eventually drop you anyway. That necessitates going back to the app to know you have a message anyway. That's shitty in my book. For heavens sake, you can't even LOGOUT manually from the app.

    15. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Caboosian · · Score: 1

      This may be a stupid question, but couldn't you circumvent the whole "message sending" thing by sending through email/over the web? I mean, if you bookmark the page, it wouldn't be much of an inconvenience.

    16. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by AlanMJones · · Score: 1

      You can send SMS messages from a web site instead (I'm not affiliated with this site, just googled it):
      http://www.geek.com/send-sms-messages-via-the-web/

    17. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by paazin · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I'm boggled why people think SMS is either dead or just about - far from.

    18. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Tintivilus · · Score: 1

      Are there really any carriers left that don't have an email-to-sms gateway? I routinely e-mail number@carrier.com instead of sending SMS.

    19. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by raddan · · Score: 1

      3G is pretty hot shit-- I've been using one of Sprint's cards for the last couple of months. OK, maybe the US is ass-backward compared to the rest of the mobile world, but it's still pretty damn cool to have an SSH session open while I'm on the train. I'm presently looking into OpenAFS as that should deal with occasional dead spots better than SSH, but in general, the experience is much better than I was expecting. Not quite up to Hulu-watching speeds, but it's definitely making me depend more on my laptop-- and I pretty much hate laptops.

      That's a long way of saying that the 3G is worth it even if you have to deal with the outrageous SMS pricing.

    20. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Apple did say the push service wouldn't be up and running for another month or so. Does anyone still use the actual AIM app? I'm waiting for Adium to come to the iPhone once Apple gets it's act together with the push services.

    21. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      As a 1st generation iPhone owner who has some big bills to pay in the coming weeks (and hence skipping the iPhone 3G for now)... man is EDGE slow. I look forward to the day when I can get 3G access. The web browser on the iPhone is practically useless without WiFi.

    22. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      OK, maybe the US is ass-backward compared to the rest of the mobile world, but it's still pretty damn cool to have an SSH session open while I'm on the train.

      You were on a train in the US?!

    23. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by novakyu · · Score: 1

      The whole point of SMS is that you can send to any cellphone with SMS capability that is why it is hard to get rid of

      'Fixed it for you.

      Try sending an SMS to a landline phone, you insensitive clod.

    24. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Vincepb · · Score: 1

      Works fine in the UK.

      Atleast, it does for me. (landline service is provided by Virgin).

      Cheers,
      Vince.

      --

      I need a sig.
    25. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      That's just crazy sad. Use a pen and paper to write a message, take a picture of the page with the phone camera and send the picture.

      Of-course I couldn't do it, don't have a camera on my phone.

    26. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      3G is pretty hot shit-- [...] it's still pretty damn cool to have an SSH session open while I'm on the train.

      It would be even cooler with an iphone, but Apple says No SSH For You!
      You can buy a Nagios-type app to monitor servers, but no ssh or even free built-in ssh to do anything with those servers.

    27. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      I browsed around the App Store and thought it was seriously lacking compared with what can be had through Installer.app, and this is ignoring the fact that most of the decent stuff requires a payment. I'd use maybe one of the radio app (like Pandora), maybe the NYT app, Weatherbug kicks ass. The rest of it is no better written than the free apps (lots of absurd interface choices), and there are no useful utilities like SSH. A killer, probably for me and a small fraction of others only, is that the developer of iXBal didn't get on the approved list, so I can't use my iPhone to give me firing solutions out on the rifle course, meaning I have to carry a Palm in addition to a phone. Obviously a selfish complaint, but there are probably many other jailbreakers thinking the same thing about their pet app and if Apple had let everyone in they'd be more amenable to upgrading.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    28. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by ibmjones · · Score: 3, Funny

      Please. That is certainly no ex

    29. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by MattW · · Score: 1

      The lack of an SSH app is currently screwing me. I unjailbroke my phone like 6 weeks ago and started to miss it pretty quickly. That said, I wasn't real impressed with terminals last time I installed one (which was way back in 1.02; I went a long with without updating)

      That said, 2.0 is already jailbroken and has legit apps running side by side with Installer.app apps.

    30. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so why the hell is that? you can have unlimited data, sent at very fast rates, watch streaming video, check your mail, etc, but those little 140byte packets, sorry, those are $0.20 each...

      Much to my surprise, nobody actually answered your question! My understanding of the situation is that there are two (quite legitimate) reasons. (1) People are seemingly *eager* to pay it, and (2) Each SMS requires a control message packet, which travels on a piece of the cell band that is much narrow and busy than generic voice or data.

    31. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Now that people are getting a taste of always-on IM on the iPhone they'll start demanding the same from other phones.

      Plus, you can SMS for free within the AIM app.

    32. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people aren't "willing" they're just powerless.

    33. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by raddan · · Score: 1

      The Northeast Corridor (and actually, points north of that as well) has fairly good train service. I can travel from Boston to see my brother in Baltimore, for only marginally more time than it takes to fly, and it costs much less. For shorter trips, like my daily commute to work, I ride the MBTA Commuter Rail, which nowadays is pretty reliable and relatively comfortable. And with the exceptions of where the tracks venture out into the salt marsh, I have a cell signal the entire way. If you want to travel west, though, forget it-- fly, drive, or take a bus.

    34. Re:The big news really is the 2.0 software by raddan · · Score: 1

      And that's why as cool as the iPhone is, I won't be getting one anytime soon. I can do SSH just fine on my Blackberry and with my Sprint AirCard, so that's what I stick with. Ideally, I would simply have a general-purpose computer running linux that also served as a cellphone. Something that I could just jack into a monitor and keyboard when I wanted the full desktop experience-- a real mobile computer-- would be the best.

  6. Best "i" Joke Ever by Spencerian · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the meltdown of Apple's servers given international demand:

    Quoth ABC News and others:

    It's the iPocalypse!!!

    The Apple revolution may be televised, but streaming is down at this time...

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:Best "i" Joke Ever by Mix+Master+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Funny how Steve Jobs is sitting on the board of ABC News' parent company. Wait, that isn't funny.

      --
      Oppressing an entire population is never cheap.
      --Jeckler (/. Beta IS GARBAGE!)
    2. Re:Best "i" Joke Ever by AllIGotWasThisNick · · Score: 1

      I think more importantly than just on the board of directors, "Jobs is currently the Walt Disney Company's largest individual shareholder".

  7. Fullfilling the requisite joke by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    No LTE. Less space than a blue-ray disk. Lame.

    1. Re:Fullfilling the requisite joke by Tikkun · · Score: 1

      No LTE. Less space than a blue-ray disk. Lame.

      Funny, but I think you mean "No SDHC slot. No hardware keyboard. Lame."

  8. Activation, not sync by necro81 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Correction: the problems people are experiencing have to do with the activation servers, it doesn't have much to do with syncing. Although, one cannot sync their phone (or do anything with it, really) until they first activate it through itunes.

    1. Re:Activation, not sync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now they will try to convince us that their servers run Windows? Because, as far as I know, Apple just works!

    2. Re:Activation, not sync by sir_jimmy · · Score: 1

      I have a first generation iPhone (no jail break), and I went through the download/installation steps for the 2.0 firmware update just fine. But when it came to re-activating the phone, iTunes keeps timing out -- very inconvenient. People might want to hold off on the 2.0 upgrade if you have a first generation iPhone until apple gets their activation server back up.

    3. Re:Activation, not sync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Correction to your correction: Beyond the initial activation, iTunes still contacts its mother servers at the start of a sync. This is impacting not only new phones, but existing ones and even touches.

      After waiting more than two hours for my 2.0 upgraded first-gen iPhone to reactivate and emerge from its bricked state, I still (another couple hours later) can't do a normal sync. Even my touch (which wasn't upgraded) won't do anything when tethered to iTunes any more.

      But at least Apple will learn from their mistakes. It's not like they had any widespread activation snafus last time around.

      Oh, wait...

    4. Re:Activation, not sync by fermion · · Score: 1
      The problem is that, in order to fight cell phone unlockers, Apple bricks the phone prior to installing any update. The problem is we don't expect this from Apple because the one reason many of us buy apple is because the device is not all of the sudden going to become useless because Apple wants more money. For instance, Apple computers never ask to be revalidated after the memory has been upgraded.

      Not only is there little excuse for Apple to brick customers phone during every update, there is no excuse to let the servers go down so that legitimate customers cannot use their phones. This action becomes more malicious because the software backs up the phone prior to updating, so at the very least Apple should allow the customer to roll back. Of course, Apple is getting into the MS mindset where fighting piracy is becoming more important than serving customers.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Activation, not sync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please learn what the term "brick" means.

  9. Just Got Mine... by hondo77 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...at an AT&T Store. They told me I need to go home and connect to iTunes to finish the activation. It's not ideal but it's no biggie. I'm thinking Apple will have smoothed out any problems out by the time I get home this afternoon. Well, at least I can charge it here at work.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    1. Re:Just Got Mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Apple servers are slammed and Apple iPhone discussion forum is overloaded.
      Best to avoid the update mess for a few days.
      It will not be fixed tonight.
      Do not attempt an upgrade of your old phone, as you will lose all contacts until you get the final activation from iTunes Store.

    2. Re:Just Got Mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Hawaii, which was just about the last place on Earth to get these things on the 11th. So by the time I showed up at the little ATT kiosk in the mall at 7:50 AM (there was hardly any line there, and a line of 30 or so at the freestanding ATT store near my house), the folks selling the phones had already heard about the problems on the mainland.

      Conveniently, the west-coast wave had peaked hours earlier, too. Sometimes it's nice to be 3 hours behind California.

      So the nice ATT girl said that they weren't doing the activations right there due to stuff being "broken" (read: the problems on the mainland) but that I could activate it at home. I went home figuring I'd have to wait all day, but plugged it in and it breezed right through the process with no glitches or even delays at all.

      So I seem to have missed out on all the fun. :(

  10. Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

    I'm on the Pacific timezone, so everyone out here got the short end of the stick. AT&T is selling the phones and setting up the contracts, but they can do little else besides make a token effort to activate the phone and then send people home to activate it later. I just sold my soul and gave $200 to AT&T, I'd really like to play with my iPhone.

    1. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      So play find the iPhone. You should be able to get in a good couple of rounds before it gets activated.

      To make it interesting, start the game with copious amounts of vodka.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just sold my soul and gave $200 to AT&T, I'd really like to play with my iPhone.

      And you're not even allowed to play with it by yourself without activation?

      Try and tell me that the future wouldn't be darker with Apple at the helm than Microsoft... Just try.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      OK.

      I would rather have an Apple device that didn't work than a Windows device that did. Either Apple would fix the problem and I'd have a working Apple device, or they wouldn't and I'd get my money back.

      But all available evidence has shown that no one can fix Windows.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    4. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by 74nova · · Score: 1

      I won't make a big deal of it, but mod parent up, pour favor

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    5. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But all available evidence has shown that no one can fix Windows.

      The evidence has shown mostly that it will take everyone to fix Windows.

      Microsoft has been making more token displays of Openness because people are demanding that they be more Open.

      If we demonstrate (financially) that it is not sufficient, then they will actually become more Open as have various other companies like IBM and even Apple (although they are going back and forth on their Open Source promises.) IBM sells more Linux than AIX today. Much of the MacOS is Open Source. Back in the day, Apple sold you a computer you couldn't open without a special screwdriver (I've had two MacCaseCrackers stolen from me already, criminy) and if you wrote software on an old IBM mainframe, it became the property of IBM. (Perhaps not at the same time.) Microsoft can be shown the error of their ways as well, if we just decide that it is possible, and don't settle for half-measures.

      But meanwhile, Apple is still half-assing it, and it's still Apple's way or the highway. Why shouldn't an iPhone let you use all the non-phone functionality right out of the box? Why can't you pick it up and start using the WiFi functions and the web browser? Answer: because Apple wants your personal information.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by linuxpng · · Score: 1

      mod this guy up.

    7. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by goofy183 · · Score: 1

      Or how about neither at the helm and just have some competition. It isn't like Apple is anywhere near threating Microsoft yet and until that happens I'm just happy that there are more and more choices. Perhaps someone will finally get something right.

    8. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just sold my soul and gave $200 to AT&T, I'd really like to play with my iPhone.

      And you're not even allowed to play with it by yourself without activation?

      Try and tell me that the future wouldn't be darker with Apple at the helm than Microsoft... Just try.

      Let's see:

      Apple's iPods - no activation
      Apple's computers - no activation
      Apple's other hardware - no activation
      Apple's operating system - no activation
      Apple and AT&T's iPhone - mandatory activation
      AT&T's other mobile phones - mandatory activation

      Blaming Apple for cell phone activation is almost as silly as blaming your sports car manufacturer for speed limit signs.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    9. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try and tell me that the future wouldn't be darker with Apple at the helm than Microsoft... Just try.

      Okay. As a sibling has already suggested, the iPhone activation has more to do with their current AT&T partnership than Apple. Even Mac OS X comes with no activation.

      The only valid complaint you could make is with regards to having to use iTunes. In my opinion, it's a long stretch to call any of this "dark."

      Okay I tried, and that was easy.

    10. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by DdJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually... the iPod Touch also won't work without activating it by connecting it to iTunes. It's got a notepad application, a YouTube viewer, a mail client, a web browser, none of these things are set up by iTunes, but none of them works until the iPod Touch is activated by connecting it to iTunes.

    11. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Blaming Apple for cell phone activation is almost as silly as blaming your sports car manufacturer for speed limit signs.

      (-1, StupidCarAnalogyByStupidPerson)

      Guess what? My RAZR V3i lets me play Java games if it has any SIM in it (including a test SIM, which is about $6.) It doesn't have to be activated. The device wasn't locked when I got it (not even a subsidy lock, since I got it from edge wireless, now part of AT&T, god damn it.)

      It's more like having your sports car delivered to your house, then having to contact the manufacturer with your name, address, phone number, current location and VIN before you are able to turn the key and drive even on your own property - and right now, their call center is very, very busy.

      See, in this analogy, WiFi is your own property; at least, it's not the phone company's. And the cellphone network is the phone company's network. Apple is the auto manfacturer; it's not only none of their fucking business where or who you are, but just as it is perfectly legal to purchase a car and not register it and then use it for off-road use only (and I don't mean dirt roads in BLM land, which are considered roads for all purposes of law, but instead dune riding or on-track racing) it is also totally legal and reasonable for you to use such a device on your own network.

      See what I did there? For those at home who missed it, I just took your analogy which bore no resemblance whatsoever to the situation at hand, and made it almost make sense.

      If you had to get permission from GM via onstar before being allowed to pull your car out of your garage and into your driveway, would you be amused? Especially if it didn't work?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blaming Apple for cell phone activation is almost as silly as blaming your sports car manufacturer for speed limit signs.

      AT&T's other cell phones require "activation", but AT&T does it with their own system.

      The iPhone must be activated using Apple's servers. Today, that appears to be where the problem lies. That puts the responsibility squarely on Apple's shoulders.

      AT&T is having no problems doing activations for non-iPhone customers today, other than they have to wait in line along with all the people waiting for an iPhone.

    13. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > AT&T's other mobile phones - mandatory activation

      Well, no. If you're already an ATT customer, that is. You can just go to an ATT store, pay for a phone full price, and then insert your existing SIM. Nothing to activate.

    14. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that ti requires activation, it's that they couldn't do it on launch last time and they still can't.

      If you're going to entice someone to enter a long term deal with a tiny electronic gadget (it's not a business machine, it's a gadget) you better make it fucking work.

    15. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, but the "activation" just pairs the device with the computer; it doesn't verify anything with Apple's servers. You can set up an iPod Touch with no Internet access whatsoever.

      The techno-survivalist geek in me wants gadgets that are fully functional right out of the box, but the experienced IT geek in me has learned that without a degree of control, inexperienced users get themselves into deep trouble.

      In other words, I'd rather spend a minute pairing the handheld device with the PC at the very start than spend hours trying to get the two to sync properly after the fact... It's always fun making two semi-overlapping contact lists/mail folders/calendars on two separate devices perfectly merge with no loss or duplication of data. While the CFO breathes down your neck.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    16. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Try and tell me that the future wouldn't be darker with Apple at the helm than Microsoft... Just try."

      Ok. The future wouldn't be darker with Apple at the helm than Microsoft.

      Yeah, I can't do it with a straight face either.

    17. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by bwalling · · Score: 1

      I just sold my soul and gave $200 to AT&T, I'd really like to play with my iPhone.

      And you're not even allowed to play with it by yourself without activation? Try and tell me that the future wouldn't be darker with Apple at the helm than Microsoft... Just try.

      I think the device you're looking for is called the iPod Touch. Pretty much the same thing, just without the phone part. Since AT&T is paying part of the purchase price for you, you need a contract to get that price concession. If you don't want phone service, then buy the Touch. You're not being screwed as hard as you seem to want to be screwed.

    18. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      My original point was simply not to blame the manufacturer for something that isn't their fault.

      Your allegory is fairly decent, but I'd suggest adding a few points:

      First, add that the reason you have to contact the manufacturer to activate your sports car is because the government mandated activation on all sports cars. The manufacturer that made your sports car sells 20 other vehicles, none of which require activation.

      Second, add that the activation works fine 364 days out of the year, but today a hugely anticipated new model year was released nationwide and the servers are swamped. Oh - and the same people complaining about spending hours waiting to activate the car also spent hours standing in line just so that they could be the firstest person in teh w0rld! to own one.

      Third, add that the mandatory activation can be easily bypassed with a freely available tool which everyone knows about. It won't make the vehicle street legal, but you'll still gain full access to the vehicle for personal use.

      There. Now we've got one hell of a ridiculously over-complicated but relatively accurate "analogy".

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    19. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think the device you're looking for is called the iPod Touch. Pretty much the same thing, just without the phone part.

      And without the camera part. That's a deal-breaker for me.

    20. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer: because Apple wants your personal information.

      No, AT&T wants it, so it knows who to bill. Apple just wants the money AT&T pays them to subsidize the iPhone, and so bows to their requirements.

    21. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by bwalling · · Score: 1

      And without the camera part. That's a deal-breaker for me.

      The camera in the iPhone is so bad that it's basically worthless. You're not missing anything.

    22. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Given the insane draw that the magic "iii-Phoooneee" (cut briefly to random gumby skit) has, I wouldn't be surprised if it killed any server farm. But I really don't care if the "early adopter" mobs had to wait six hours to activate their new phones. People who want to wait in lines... wait in lines. People who want the smoothest possible experience... wait a few days or weeks for the crowds to thin and the initial bugs to be worked out.

      I'm a big fan of usability, and IMHO the iPhone is head and shoulders above other smartphones in that regard. Since I work for a living, my time is important; if an iPhone saves me one minute per day it pays for itself a few times over each year.

      But the coverage these days on everything Apple makes is ridiculous. It's a great phone. It's not the second coming of Christ. There are very important things happening in the world right now; why are we getting worked up because a gadget got updated today, a zillion people rushed out to get it, and they're now slash... er, iPhone-dotting a server farm?

      Forgive me for getting political, but it'll all be over tomorrow. FISA won't.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    23. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The camera in the iPhone is so bad that it's basically worthless. You're not missing anything.

      From what I've seen, it's acceptable. Besides, the crappy camera I have on me is more useful than the high-quality camera I left at home!

    24. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by jadedoto · · Score: 1

      It won't be. Don't you know that Apple prefers shiny aluminium and aethetically pleasing chrome and plastic?

    25. Re:Sitting At Home With a Paperweight by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      Or it might be because the cost of the iPhone is heavily subsidised by the contract you agree to sign before you open the box. (which is clearly marked and you are allowed to return it for a full refund if you don't agree)

      You know, might be. Of course they could be just after your succulent nutritious personal data, lifeblood of "Evil Coporations (tm)"

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
  11. Time to anti-hype by jollyreaper · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For those breathless in anticipation, please accept this as a bit of anti-hype.

    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone

    The iPhone is a cool toy but I can't quite justify paying what they want for the data service. From talking to people in the industry, the innovation with the iPhone isn't so much with the device itself, it's with the kind of deal Apple was able to cut. The mobile market is fragmented with too many handsets, too many crappy versions of Java that work inconsistently, and the carriers eat too much of the profits. With the iPhone, developers get 70% of the take, it's a uniform environment to develop for, and Apple has beaten up AT&T to get better terms on a few other parts as well.

    So, here's looking forward to what the future holds for the iPhone. Any significant success should hopefully foster some imitation and innovation from other manufacturers.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Time to anti-hype by revscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      From talking to people in the industry, the innovation with the iPhone isn't so much with the device itself, it's with the kind of deal Apple was able to cut.

      No, the innovation is making the features easy to use. Surveys have been done asking phone users if they use the email, internet, etc., capabilities of their phones. Compared to other smartphone users, iPhone users use more of their phone's capabilities, and more often.

      I'm too lazy to find the survey right now, and you certainly have no reason to trust me. But the innovation with the iPhone may be related to its pricing structure, but people like it because it is a solid, stable, and very usable device. Add to this the ability to couple it with your computer at home and it really is easy to see why this device is popular.

    2. Re:Time to anti-hype by Ares · · Score: 1

      Compared to other smartphone users, iPhone users use more of their phone's capabilities, and more often.

      While I'm certainly not going to argue with you that iphone users use the "smart" features more than other smartphone users, this statement has me wondering why iPhone users are more likely to use the capabilities. I've got an AT&T 8525, and I certainly don't use the features of it, at least not over the data network. Over the Wi-Fi absolutely, but I don't have a data package, and don't care to spend the extra $$ necessary to get a data package, and can live with that, since the phone does have WiFi. If, however, I were forced to have a data package, by having an iPhone, I'd definitely be more likely to use the "smart" features than I am now. That's just me, but I'd be very interested in seeing the reasons people use them more.

    3. Re:Time to anti-hype by immcintosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From talking to people in the industry, the innovation with the iPhone isn't so much with the device itself, it's with the kind of deal Apple was able to cut.

      And this, my friends, is exactly why none of the other clueless companies have managed to put out a similar product that can even come CLOSE to competing with the iPhone on its own terms. The innovation was in the software and to a lesser extend the hardware. The deal with AT&T was because AT&T saw the innovation and said to themselves, "Oshit, we best get ourselves in on this shit." Even having something of a dislike for Apple (honestly, I'd rather have Microsoft in a position of power than them), real credit is due to how slick their software on the iPhone is.

    4. Re:Time to anti-hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XKCD 386

    5. Re:Time to anti-hype by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Add to this the ability to couple it with your computer at home and it really is easy to see why this device is popular.

      And therein lies my biggest complaint with the iPhone. I can use it with my computer at home, or my computer at work, but not both. iTunes is one of the biggest piece of shit software packages I have ever used, second only to RealPlayer, but getting close. The iPod functionality is basically useless for me if I can only sync with one computer. Just let drag and drop things to the phone for fucks sake.

      --
      I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    6. Re:Time to anti-hype by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Just let drag and drop things to the phone for fucks sake.

      It's been awhile since I've used my ipod across multiple computers, but IIRC if you turn off auto-syncing you could drag anything from multiple computers onto the ipod while keeping everything already on the ipod intact. What you can't do is drag off of the ipod onto the computer. Although, you can spend the $20 and get an app that will allow you pull songs back off the ipod.

    7. Re:Time to anti-hype by Ares · · Score: 1

      I should probably point out that I'm not questioning the survey results; I've played with iPhones, and damn straight they make the smartphone functions easily accessible. I'm just wondering if the survey gets into the reasoning of its results; whether they're more used because Apple has made them easy to use, or whether they're more convenient to use because the data plan is a requirement.

    8. Re:Time to anti-hype by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      So, here's looking forward to what the future holds for the iPhone. Any significant success should hopefully foster some imitation and innovation from other manufacturers.

      Wow, that comment got the shit downmodded out of it. Insufficiently worshipful perhaps?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    9. Re:Time to anti-hype by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it was the innovation that attracted AT&T so much as the demand. People had been chomping at the bit for an iPod phone for a couple of years when it was announced, so whatever cell company was willing to bow to Apple's demands would have exclusive rights to a device predestined to sell like hot-cakes. Odds are that the decision was made at AT&T before Apple had a recognisable iPhone OS.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  12. .. sent home without their sync complete by stretchpuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's if you ever get past the line to even get a phone in the first place.

    iPhone 3G lines make DMV look like baskin robins.

    1. Re:.. sent home without their sync complete by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      I swear - I just don't get the hype. I understand that it's a cool new gadget and all, but I never understood these early adopters who need to have it the first day it's released. I remember back at Christmas time, they had a line just to get into the Apple store! Last I checked, Apple does have an online store... er... unless the problem is that you don't have a computer to access it with, but then I'd recommend buying a cheap Linux machine :-).

    2. Re:.. sent home without their sync complete by stretchpuppy · · Score: 1

      They aren't selling the phones online yet AFAIK. (U.S.) The lines are literally wrapping around the mall, going outside, around two trash bins, and coming back inside where the line ends near the store.

      It's insane.

    3. Re:.. sent home without their sync complete by irondonkey · · Score: 1

      I thought that they were not ever going to sell online, what with the mandatory in-store activation now.

    4. Re:.. sent home without their sync complete by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      Oh I know that, I was just talking about their other products. However, I don't see why people love to be "early adopters", it's first off a lot of risk, and secondly, a huge waste of time. Go back in a few days and buy the damn thing. I guess people will do just about anything to look trendy.

    5. Re:.. sent home without their sync complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No line at the AT&T store a co-worker tried at lunch time - they sold all their iPhones in the first hour they were open.

      The salesman half-heartedly mumbled, "We have plenty of BlackBerries".

  13. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by NiceGeek · · Score: 0, Troll

    Maybe you shouldn't lose your expensive phone then.

  14. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    I haven't read the fine print on my service recently but I'm wondering if this is standard. I think when you get a new phone for any reason, you'll have to activate it for a fee, but you stay with your original contract. Most companies I think will waive the fee if you simply sign up for a new contract.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  15. as an admitted apple fanboy, i must say.... by spoot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am completely sick of hearing about this thing. everyfarkingwhere you turn it's 'iphone-iphone-iphone' arghhhh. of course I might be singing a different tune if 1) I had a job and the economy was doing ok so I could afford one 2) knew someone i could actually make a phone call to. but oh how I do want to hold it's shinyness in my filty little hands and multi-touch it's glassy goodness. Unfortunately I have to buy groceries this month and pine for the days when I had a decent credit score.

    1. Re:as an admitted apple fanboy, i must say.... by D+Ninja · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am completely sick of hearing about this thing. everyfarkingwhere you turn it's 'iphone-iphone-iphone' arghhhh. of course I might be singing a different tune if ...

      Don't you mean you might be singing a different iTune?

    2. Re:as an admitted apple fanboy, i must say.... by twitchingbug · · Score: 1

      While, yes, the hype is there, I must say that I'm pretty happy that Slashdot didn't go all iPhone 3G news/rumor crazy in the past couple of weeks... I was suprised at the restrait. :)

      and groceries? c'mon man, where are your priorities?!?

    3. Re:as an admitted apple fanboy, i must say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then... maybe you should try to get a job instead of spending your time posting to slashdot.

    4. Re:as an admitted apple fanboy, i must say.... by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I think that the reason the iPhone is such a big deal to people is that it is apple's first telephone product. If google released a phone (a whole, real phone), it would get almost as much press as the iPhone. Or I'll bet that if MS released one, they'd get a lot of press.

      When Nokia releases a new phone, it doesn't get as much attention because it's just another model number for most people (although they _do_ get press, I've seen it on the tv). Another iteration or two and the iphone will get much less press; part of this will be due to other companies releasing essentially the same product in order to stay competetive (and that's already happening).

      Eventually apple will release something even better, and the cycle will repeat. Trying to avoid apple products would be like trying to avoid toyotas when you're out driving.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  16. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by necro81 · · Score: 0

    If you lose or break your cellphone, any cellphone out there, you are pretty much out of luck. If you bought into the seller's extended warranty or other such program, you can probably get a replacement. However, by and large, those types of services are a ripoff. Some credit cards have "insurance" for big ticket items like computers and appliances.

    What could one expect - that after losing your cellphone, you would be given a replacement for free?

    As for signing up for a new two-year contact, welcome to the insanity of the U.S. wireless market (and some international markets from what I hear). You might be able to haggle over that, however, and stick within your original contract. It depends on who you get and whether you can speak reasonably - yelling and screaming at them probably won't help you.

  17. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by William+Ager · · Score: 1, Informative

    It should also be noted that current ATT customers apparently have to both pay the full price and sign up for a two year contract too, despite the fact that this isn't the case for any other phone ATT sells.

  18. The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a pro geek, my arsenal of electronic gadgets used to climb in number. In the past year or so, I've gotten down to 4 items I need and use daily:

    1. iMate Ultimate 6150 (primary phone, T-Mobile, EDGE)
    2. HTC Trinity P3600 (secondary phone, AT&T, 3G)
    3. iPod Touch 16GB
    4. TomTom GO 910 GPS

    My Trinity has a great GPS built in, so the TomTom could go. The iPhone 2 would almost get rid of 3 devices, actually, except for one feature that is missing/disabled: tethering.

    I travel, a lot, for my businesses. Nationally and internationally, I use my cell phone for email, phone calls, and basic billing. A notebook is not in my list of gadgets, even though I usually have 2 on me some of the time. Being able to tether to my Trinity is a huge need. On the Trinity I run a WiFiRouter app that lets me tether any WiFi device to the web at full 3G speeds. If I am with clients, employees or subcontractors, having a great WiFi wireless router is a huge gain. But Apple refuses to allow it.

    I'm sure some third party hackers will eventually get tethering to work. If so, Apple will gain a customer or 15 (I'd give this option to any of my staff who uses wireless tethering regularly or even irregularly). So why did Apple not offer this feature? Battery life? AT&T telling them not to?

    I'm using tethering right now, in fact. On the go. I have two notebooks booted up and online, and they're working great. But I'd love to downsize all my devices to one.

    So I'm calling you out Apple. Add a tethering feature to the next ROM update!

    1. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have tethering with a jail-broken iPhone.

    2. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a pro geek, my arsenal of electronic gadgets used to climb in number. In the past year or so, I've gotten down to 4 items I need and use daily: 1. iMate Ultimate 6150 (primary phone, T-Mobile, EDGE) 2. HTC Trinity P3600 (secondary phone, AT&T, 3G) 3. iPod Touch 16GB 4. TomTom GO 910 GPS ...

      Nokia, as many other brands, can reduce all of that to one phone (can even install TomTom)... and have 5MP camera with flash, and 30FPS video camera, and an officially unlocked phone. Apple is not the best thing, since sliced bread - you have other options.

    3. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Why does every old technology need a new name when it's internet-connected? Why not just say you're using your phone as an AP? The question then becomes (to me) how does Apple stop you from doing it? Can't the iPhone connect to access points? And if so, what is different about your phone-as-access-point that makes it unsuitable as an access point, and furthermore, why is that Apple's fault?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw tethering, Bluetooth PAN owns.

      No setup (on my Mac at least, dunno how Windows would compare), as long as the phone is paired to the computer I choose "Join network" from the Bluetooth menu and boom, I'm on the internet via my phone.

      Bluetooth PAN is definitely on my iPhone feature wish list. For now I'm sticking with my S-E K550i.

    5. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      They don't have that? The AT&T page makes it look like it's an option.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    6. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by immcintosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is tethering not something that could be implemented with the SDK? I honestly don't know, not having a Mac (which as far as I'm aware is needed to make proper use of the SDK), I haven't investigated.

      That said, tethering HAS been implemented by third parties, for quite some time now. Unfortunately, it's so far required a jailbroken iPhone and some fairly low level hackery that I don't think the average user would feel comfortable doing.

    7. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm about 95% sure this is already possible with a jailbroken 1st gen. Proxy via wifi.

      Granted, slower with edge, but I'm sure it'll be a very short wait for it to work with 3g as well.

    8. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do a lot of international traveling as well. Although I don't use data nearly as much as some do, it is unbelievably nice to be able to pop in a SIM card for whatever country I'm in and make phone calls. Recently I bought a global SIM which gives me one telephone number allowing me to be reached anywhere. If Apple would allow their customers to have this kind of functionality they would have at least one more customer.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    9. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 1

      I too would love to see a tether-able iPhone from Apple. Until I see it from Apple, it should be available shortly from the unsupported avenue of 3rd-party development... jailbreaking and using one of the installer apps / repositories. iPhone s/w 2.0 has been jailbroken and it should just be hours/days before a public method is detailed and released. On iPhone h/w 1.x there were numerous proxy programs available. They worked by making an ad-hoc wifi connection with a laptop and entering some network settings on the computer.

      I know, I want a solution from Apple too. But if it works the same way it did for iPhone h/w 1, it's good enough for me.

    10. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 1

      The SDK would allow you to make such an app, but I'd be quite surprised if Apple blessed it for it's App store given the broad exclusive language of the App store terms of service.

      Given how much more traffic I could generate on a computer vs. an iPhone, it'd probably fall under the "Generates disruptive amounts of bandwidth" exclude-from-store clause. Just speculation of course.

    11. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      there's always the Neo with the OpenMoko OS, not sure when it will be more available in the US stores though

    12. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Seriously... what the FUCK is tethering? I've never heard that term before. Is it an Appleism?

    13. Re:The iPhone is dead to me, and maybe other geeks by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      There are guides that can show you how to use an iPhone (original) to use your EDGE internet connection from your laptop via Wifi. Granted, this does require non-Apple supported software modifications, but it's doable. They also let you use a service provider other than AT&T, and let you install any of a TON of software on the phone that perform a huge variety of tasks that you might or might not have a use for.

      But no, AT&T is never going to let Apple do this officially for people who arent savvy enough to unlock/jailbreak their phones on their own. At the very least, not without making sure it requires you to pay a hefty additional fee to do it.

  19. Any service plan discounts for AT&T premier by ProfBooty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wouldnt mind picking one up if I can maintain my discounts as an AT&T premier customer.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    1. Re:Any service plan discounts for AT&T premier by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll only get one if I can maintain my discounts as an AT&T Super mega ultra platinum AT&T contract only customer (you have to know someone, if you ask about it, they'll tell you it doesn't exist).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Any service plan discounts for AT&T premier by uselessengineer · · Score: 1

      I had to ditch my premier customer 20% off when i signed up for the iphone 1

  20. Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well I'm back from the local AT&T store empty-handed. Apparently they only had 30 phones to sell, and with the broken activation servers it took them hours to distribute them. I stopped by at 11:45 because the line was short, but the news came shortly thereafter that the phones were gone. The news came from frustrated customers leaving the store, not the AT&T staff.

    Apple had over a year to correct the supply/activation fiasco of the initial iPhone launch, and so far it's going worse, not better. The new iPhone is also more expensive to own - Job's "half the cost" pitch is an outright lie. 3G (where available) simply provides the "user experience" that people expected from the original iPhone. I already had a bad experience with Edge, so I didn't waste my time with it.

    They intentionally planned both an iTunes software upgrade and the release of 2.0 software for the original iPhone and iPod Touch for today, and they didn't plan for overloaded servers? I was fortunate enough to have gotten the iTunes update before the rush, but all day long, the "Buy Now" button on apple.com for the 2.0 upgrade (for my iTouch) is "temporarily unavailable".

    By the way, It's $10 to "upgrade" the iTouch to accept the 2.0 software upgrade. This upgrade is needed to run 2.0, which is required if you want to install any additional apps from the Apple Apps store. An original iPhone and my iTouch both cost the same ($399), but if I had an iPhone, the software update to 2.0 would be free. Also, I made the mistake of buying the earlier $20 iTouch software upgrade. Turns out the 2.0 upgrade includes that upgrade as well, and already having it doesn't make the 2.0 upgrade any cheaper (or free, as it should be)

    How much longer before the masses will finally see through the bad customer experiences with Apple (they go on and on - unreplaceable iPod batteries, rip-off price of the original iPhone (reduced shortly after release to really tick off the loyal early adopters), and now another botched product release. When will the loyal fans finally say "ENOUGH!"

    1. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by geekoid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      what a whiner.

      for example:
      "rip-off price of the original iPhone (reduced shortly after release to really tick off the loyal early adopters),"
      It wasn't "shortly" after release, and all things early adopters buy go down in price.

      I'm not sure why you think upgrades should be free.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by maxume · · Score: 1

      How about you tell us. From what I can see, you own a relatively recent Apple mp3 player and went to the store prepared to spend some money...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they were smarter they would have pushed the 2.0 update out to existing iPhone owners already, and been learning things and doing updates so that the 2.0 users would have a closer-to-trouble-free launch. But, you know, they aren't.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by Demiansmark · · Score: 1

      Maybe when people like you stop going to the store the day they launch a product. I don't disagree with any particular point you made but you reference 'the masses' when it's obvious that you yourself have yet to say 'ENOUGH!'

    5. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Well I'm back from the local AT&T store empty-handed

      ...

      How much longer before the masses will finally see through the bad customer experiences with Apple

      I don't want to sound like an ass, but it's sort of hard not to: Do you realize how much like a whining crybaby you sound?

      You couldn't get an iPhone, so you stomped back to your PC to post some disparaging remarks to make those bastards pay.

      The next time you want to Make Them Pay(TM) by exposing them to the masses, you shouldn't start by talking about how you just got thwarted in your attempt to buy your product (because they sold out).

      I don't even know if I want an iPhone or not, or whether it's worth the hype, so don't assume I'm a fan.

    6. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by Admodieus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Two months is a really early time for a price cut of $200.

      --
      "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
    7. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by twitchingbug · · Score: 1

      I have 2 comments

      1) You seem bitter not being able to walk out of the store with an iPhone 3G.

      2) Loyal fans will say enough when the value of all those combined experiences outweighs the value of having an iPhone 3G.

      By the masses that walked out with unactivated phones, something tells me that we are far from that breakpoint.

    8. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much longer before the masses will finally see through the bad customer experiences with Apple (they go on and on - unreplaceable iPod batteries, rip-off price of the original iPhone (reduced shortly after release to really tick off the loyal early adopters), and now another botched product release. When will the loyal fans finally say "ENOUGH!"

      I wager it will happen right around the time people realize that this is just one big consumerist bullshit lifestyle wherein people attempt to purchase happiness because the life that we have created for ourselves, while convenient, is empty and meaningless... ...its just a fucking phone.

      dude.

    9. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Free upgrades? You mean like the rest of the industry? SP1, SP2 for example. Myriad bug and security fixes, along with minor new features. Why pay $10 mainly for the opportunity to buy more software. Only a company like Apple could pull that off.

    10. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm also fully armed with the iPhone SDK, ready to develop and sell my own software in the App Store. As a consumer, I've generally avoided Apple products.

    11. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also received unsolicited emails from both Apple and AT&T to come by today and pick up an iPhone. Both companies were incredibly ill-prepared for me and many others to do exactly that. Apple was free to set any day they like to release the product, and with the experience from the first iPhone, they don't have many good excuses for botching it so badly. But that won't stop the Apple apologists for somehow blaming someone else, even their (potential) customers.

    12. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 1

      My threshold for bitterness is much higher. I wasted just a few minutes. There were many people who were there for hours and got nothing but a sunburn.

      Ironically, part of the high demand for the new iPhone are these "loyal fans" who bought the original iPhone and want the upgrade. Apparently, they can't be all that happy with what they got last year. At some point, I think the scales will tip, and Apple may then be held accountable for their blunders and over-promising.

    13. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by linuxpng · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't be a tool. These are valid complaints.

      If someone tried to tell you something was 1/2 price but was really more expensive over the term, you think that's ok? It's not 5 bucks more, it's 160+/- more.

      Where do you draw the line? It's deceptive and that's a fancy word for a lie.

      How about charging ipod touch users 10 bucks so that they can spend money at the app store? That's increasing features so you spend more money. Yes I am aware that they have free apps and they have a bunch that aren't also.

      What pisses me off most is that you can still buy shit all day long on the store and not get through activation. Why couldn't they load balance the activation as much as all the other crap? Yes, I know the answer to that.

      I swear, if Steve Jobs personally kicked every Apple customer in the balls, 90 percent would talk about how they had it coming for some reason or another.

    14. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 1

      I don't assume you're a fan, I assume you're an idiot. I simply reported what was happening "on the street" and my experiences are apparently wide-spread. I'm not crying or whining about anything - you are.

    15. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      If someone tried to tell you something was 1/2 price but was really more expensive over the term, you think that's ok? It's not 5 bucks more, it's 160+/- more.

      To be fair, the phone is still half the price. The service contract with AT&T will cost you more. You are now paying for a 3G network instead of the slower 2.5G or whatever it was. Either way, how much of this is Apple's responsibility to ensure that you pay less for AT&T's services?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    16. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by ergo98 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't assume you're a fan, I assume you're an idiot. I simply reported what was happening "on the street" and my experiences are apparently wide-spread. I'm not crying or whining about anything - you are.

      Good tactic. Now you're not only a whiny crybaby, evident for all to see. You're also a bit of an asshole.

      You (an apparently eager Apple consumer) went on the day the new product is launched (for which people have *camped out*) and unsurprisingly couldn't get one. Big surprise.

      There's roll-out quirks in a hugely anticipated new product. Big surprise.

      Wahhhhhh, listen to me cry and babble about how bad Apple is because they didn't me one. Wahhhhhhh!

      Here comes the Wahhhhhhhmbulance to give you a teddy bear to hug.

    17. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, the problem with that is that it might steal some of the hype from iPhone 3G. After all, an original iPhone with 2.0 firmware has all the features of a new one, minus 3G and GPS. If you have all the original iPhones updated a week before, then the release of the new version is just going to seem like a minor hardware update.

    18. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      >>Apple had over a year to correct the supply/activation fiasco of the initial iPhone launch, and so far it's going worse, not better

      After the success of the last iphone launch, the wii launch, and this launch, do you really expect it to _ever_ get better? This is the new method of creating a media frenzy. Well, wait, I guess beanie babies probably started it. Then furbies. Then tickle me elmos. ad naus.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    19. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Did you try the Apple store instead? AT&T will have fewer iPhones than Apple stores. That was the case last year as well. It was kinda of expected that initial supplies would be limited.

      The new iPhone is also more expensive to own - Job's "half the cost" pitch is an outright lie.

      Jobs was being truthful. It costs you 1/2 as much to buy the phone. And that was all he was talking about: The phone's purchase price. It costs more to use the phone because AT&T will charge you more to use their 3G network as opposed to their older network. Is this Apple's problem that AT&T will charge you more for their services? If you're upset at the TCO, blame AT&T not Apple.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    20. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      They intentionally planned both an iTunes software upgrade and the release of 2.0 software for the original iPhone and iPod Touch for today, and they didn't plan for overloaded servers?

      I'm normally an Apple fan, but as someone whose phone has been disabled all day, I am pissed about this. First of all, why the hell do you design the update process so that it needs to be reactivated? Even if you accept that the phones have to be activated at all (and I'm not sure why that's the case at this point), why can't they just be activated once, when you purchase it, and then have software updates just work.

      But ok, that's stupid, but let's just ignore that for a second. I'll just accept that I have to activate it. But why the hell don't they have their s*#t together well enough that the activation servers are running when you release the update? WTF is the deal there?

      I'm not just complaining. I'd like an explanation. Who screwed up? The original iPhone had similar activation problems on its first day. Why the hell didn't Apple anticipate this? And when is the server going to be back up?

      And why isn't Apple releasing some information answering any of these questions. I've been without a phone all day, and have *no idea* how much longer my phone will be disabled. Apple needs to at least get their s*#t together well enough to release something saying, "Sorry for the inconvenience. This will be resolved by [time/date]."

      Hopefully someone at Apple is noticing how much they screwed the pooch on this one, and some people are getting fired. Yeah, IMO, someone high up should be fired over this.

    21. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many phones have you installed SP1 onto ? Or are you switching industries here ?

    22. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 1

      1) There's only one Apple store in the vicinity - I'm sure it was mobbed.

      2) I had other business with AT&T about my current account.

      3)Was it also kinda expected that their servers worldwide would melt down?

      4) Apple's web site says right now: "iPhone 3G: Twice as fast. Half the price". Both of those are half-truths at best. 3G is no faster if your not in one of the upgraded 3G zones. In my neighborhood, 3G is no faster - it still uses Edge. As for "half the price", If Jobs was being truthful the statement would be "cheaper to buy, somewhat more expensive to own, faster if you're in certain places." As it is, it's hype, half-truth or lie. But it is way less than truthful. I don't really care that much if it cost less or more, but I don't like being stroked, and I'll blame Apple for that.

    23. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The industry is consumer electronics.

      PC operating systems: Free software upgrades.
      Game consoles: Free software upgrades.
      Routers/modems: Free software upgrades.
      Windows OS: Free software upgrades.
      Digital cameras: Free software upgrades.
      DVD and Blu-Ray players: Free software upgrades.

      $399 iPhone: Free software upgrade.
      $399 iTouch: Software upgrade: $10

    24. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Well I'm back from the local AT&T store empty-handed. Apparently they only had 30 phones to sell, and with the broken activation servers it took them hours to distribute them.

      Yeah, Apple has officially jumped the shark because customer demand for their new product is so high they can't even produce enough to meet it... Uh huh... Right... And people are willing to stand in line in the hot summer heat for hours for a product they've never even seen or used before because Apple is such a terrible company. LOL. You really ought to read your comment and try not to laugh.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    25. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Jobs was being truthful.

      Yes, the specific statement is true. The impression it creates is false, and Apple knows that perfectly well.

      Is this Apple's problem that AT&T will charge you more for their services?

      Yes, because it was Apple's decision to make AT&T the only (supported) option for iPhones.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    26. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Um, fanboy? My point is, with the way the company is being run, HOW LONG will people be willing to stand out in the sun for their products?

      Their problem today was not unanticipated customer demand (although they may try self-servingly to spin it that way). Sorry that seems to hurt your feelings. Read the other comments in this discussion from loyal Apple customers that were done wrong today. They aren't laughing.

    27. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it is a minor hardware update. They could have kept some features back, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      ) Apple's web site says right now: "iPhone 3G: Twice as fast. Half the price". Both of those are half-truths at best. 3G is no faster if your not in one of the upgraded 3G zones. In my neighborhood, 3G is no faster - it still uses Edge. As for "half the price", If Jobs was being truthful the statement would be "cheaper to buy, somewhat more expensive to own, faster if you're in certain places." As it is, it's hype, half-truth or lie. But it is way less than truthful. I don't really care that much if it cost less or more, but I don't like being stroked, and I'll blame Apple for that.

      So now you're blaming Apple that AT&T hasn't upgraded all of it's 3G network? This is something outside of Apple's control. If you are on an upgraded network, it's true. Would you blame Sony that the local news on your HD TV isn't really in 1080i because the local news station just up-converted their signal instead of recording the news in 1080i? I hate to break it to you but every cellphone has features that don't work 100% in all of their network especially here in the US. This is not a problem exclusive to the iPhone. You take my Motorola phone away from a major city and I lose a lot of functions.

      All Jobs ever said was the phone would be cheaper to buy. You assumed everything would be cheaper just because the phone was cheaper. At the time of Jobs' keynote, no one had announced plan pricing so he couldn't have commented on what the TCO would be. Also the iPhone is being sold in 22 countries. Does Apple need to list the TCO for ever carrier? If you go to Motorola, Nokia, LG, etc, they don't tell you how much the phone rates are. It's not their place, they simply refer you to your local carrier for plan pricing.

      In this case, I can't help that you hold Apple to a higher standard than say Motorola, Nokia, or Palm. If any of them cut prices on their phones but the local carrier started charging more for the plans, would you gripe that the phone maker was ripping you off. Or that they didn't warn how much that local carrier would charge them more. Your issues are with AT&T ; don't blame Apple for AT&T's shortcomings.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    29. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by gpalyu · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but my iTouch has had multiple free updates/bug fixes since I bought it (1.1, 1.2 etc). Paying $10 for a major upgrade is a pretty small price- remember when we first got our iTouches we all knew 100% there were no apps, and were told they weren't coming. We bought touch screen iPods, not PDAs. The software has evolved, and we can choose to turn our touches into something new for a small fee.

    30. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, that was my point. It is a minor hardware update, but by releasing a huge software update at the same time, they tie the two together and it *seems* like the hardware update is a really big deal. If they didn't do that, the minor hardware update just seems like a minor hardware update.

      But let's all be happy that they didn't hold any features back. That's to their credit. They could have released the new software to only run on the 3G, just to spur people to upgrade. Most other phones work that way-- you don't get all the latest features without buying the latest model. So that's one place I'm happy with Apple.

    31. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      How much longer before the masses will finally see through the bad customer experiences with Apple (they go on and on - unreplaceable iPod batteries, rip-off price of the original iPhone (reduced shortly after release to really tick off the loyal early adopters), and now another botched product release. When will the loyal fans finally say "ENOUGH!"

      When someone else does it better. As another poster mentioned, the only thing missing from iPhone is tethering... in all other areas, the iPhone beats any phone on the market (unless you're a big keyboard fan, personal preference IMHO).

      So until some other company does it better (phone, music, photos, movies, PDA, etc. etc. integrated with PC and the web) iPhone is top dog.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    32. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hear customers are abandoning Nintendo in droves because they jumped the shark by not producing enough Wiis...oh wait..

    33. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well, when the iPhone device magically turns into a operating system, you'll ahve a point.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "If someone tried to tell you something was 1/2 price but was really more expensive over the term, you think that's ok? It's not 5 bucks more, it's 160+/- more."

      If they weren't being clear about it, sure. Buit they have been very clear that the device will be cheaper and the plan will be more. It's not deceptive at all.

      "Yes, I know the answer to that."
      oh? pray tell.

      "I swear, if Steve Jobs personally kicked every Apple customer in the balls, 90 percent would talk about how they had it coming for some reason or another."
      You might be right there. Of course someone he would do it in a styluish and friendly way.

      FTR, the only Apple products I ahve owned are:
      The Apple IIc, the iPod mini(gift) and the iPod shuffle(gift)

      I don't think qualify as a fanboi.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    35. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      YOu ahve a point, but I think Apple could probably get some other companies involved so the could compete.
      I don't know the deal Apple made with AT&T, so they7 may have their hands tied.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by linuxpng · · Score: 1

      Where's the huge disclaimer on apple.com? "Twice as fast, half the price." Apple hasn't been upfront about anything. The news media brought that tidbit out.

      I was saying I know that the store is going to be up more because a)it makes money b)they already got your money before you activated c)They didn't plan for a surge of however many million people were activating today.

      Which brings up another point, why do you need to reactivate from a firmware upgrade? Hell I had the worst smartphone in a Treo 700p. Never had to reactivate through some bottleneck for it's service updates.

      FTR, I have a mbp and a generation 1 iphone.

    37. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by Toll_Free · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I swear, if Steve Jobs personally kicked every Apple customer in the balls, 90 percent would talk about how they had it coming for some reason or another.

      They DO have it coming, they BOUGHT into Apple FanBoiDom.

      --Toll_Free

    38. Re:Has Apple jumped the shark? by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      >>> Two months is a really early time for a price cut of $200.
      I supposed you haven't looked at nVIDIA GT260 and GT280 prices recently? ;)

  21. 3g networks by Archimonde · · Score: 4, Funny

    First post!!1
    I' so pumped up about these super pony fast 3g networks and the wireless coverage is spotle

    Sent from my iPhone.

    --
    Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    1. Re:3g networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake me up when they get HDSPA in there.

      That's how I'm connecting at the moment - latency is too bad for action games but everything else works the same as an ADSL line. Best pace I've had so far is 3Mbps, and I'm told it's a little faster than that in 'Kong or central london. :D

    2. Re:3g networks by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      OMG Ponies!!!!!!1

      Sent from my iPhone.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
  22. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A friend of mine works for a company selling the iPhone 2.

    Damn you Nokia! Or is it Motorola?

  23. iFixit did the dissassembly by cdcline · · Score: 1

    iFixit did the ripping apart, not Engadget...

  24. Reality Distortion Field by alewar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    in already inside my Faraday cage, just in case.

  25. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I doubt having to buy a new contract would hold up very long in court.
    Unless, they canceled your previous contract when you reported the phone lost. If it becomes an issue, get a lawyer.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by vux984 · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend of mine works for a company selling the iPhone 2. According to him if you lose your iPhone 2 you will 1. Have to pay full price to get a new one (not too surprising imo) and

    This is true of all cell phones. Not only if you 'lose it', but if you damage it in ways that are not covered by warranty, or if you damage it out of warranty. (most cell phones have a 1 year warranty although you can often buy extended warranty.) however liquid damage and physical damage are never covered.

    2. Re-sign up for a 2 year contract.

    This really makes no sense.

    There is -always- an early termination provision that can be exercised if the phone is lost, or you move out of country or whatever. Here in Canada on Rogers, for an iphone, it is the greater of $100 or $20 per month remaining in the contract, to a maximum of $400.

    http://www.rogers.com/cms/html/iphone_vpterms.shtml

    Based on that losing the iphone 2.5 years in, one could always payout $120 (20$x6 months), and then get a new one on a 3 year contract for $199... (or whatever they would be at that point.)

    And that's 'worst case'. Usually if you have the intention of signing a new 3 year contract and your well into an existing contract the carrier will offer you a some sort of 'deal'.

    Now suppose you lost an iphone on day 2 of your 3 year contract, typically, you'd simply have to replace it at full price, and you'd still be held to the terms of your original contract. Its absurd that they would tack on an extra 2 years (a 5 year contract on a cell phone?!), and even more absurd that you'd have your contract shortened.

    And under this scenario, if you lost your iphone on the 2nd day, and they wanted to rope you into a 5 year contract, and charge you $600 replacement, you would simply exercise the early termination: $400. And then sign up to a new 3 year: $199. Same $600 bucks, but only a 3 year contract.

  27. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

    Nonsense. Your friend was lied to - all you have to do is buy a new phone and stick it on the old contract. It's basically a ploy to sell the phone shop's insurance.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  28. The update bricks Gen1 iPhone users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So dont update right away. Apple needs to start behaving like a service provider of mission/life critical services. http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=516811 http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1139 No official word from Apple yet.

    1. Re:The update bricks Gen1 iPhone users by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Apple needs to start behaving like a service provider of mission/life critical services.

      Uh, if it's mission/life critical, maybe a day-old product isn't the best idea?

    2. Re:The update bricks Gen1 iPhone users by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Uh, if it's mission/life critical, maybe an Apple product isn't the best idea?

  29. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I had a RAZR V3i replaced on warranty. It cost me about $50, but I did not have to sign up for a new plan. This was with Edge wireless, which has since been gobbled up by Ma Bell (with the ill communication)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  30. Pendantic futurama fan. by geekoid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Young people use curse words.

    Sorry, I couldn't help my self. Possible becasue I just watched that episode last night...or I have some sort of illness.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

    Well if you want a new phone to be subsidized it'll probably hold up just fine in court. The contracts are basically loans. All those free and $50 phones people get cost a lot more than that. The cell company basically lends you the money for the phone, and you pay it back over time with your contract. If someone were to take them to court and win, I would guess the cell companies would just start making the loan explicit. In the end you'd be even more screwed when you lose your phone since you have an actual loan out for it and would still owe the money. Right now you sign a new contract and you're on your way.

  32. iPhone Rendered Usless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of our sales engineers ran back here crying about his iPhone being fucked. He tried to run the update iTunes told him to do - looks like it erased everything on the disk, then it tried to connect to the iTunes store for some completely fucked reason, timed out, and left his phone completely fucking useless.

    We plugged it in to one of our macs to try and install the firmware from a local disk, but iTunes would draw a white screen with the word 'iPhone' and sit there while it tried to connect to the store.

    We sent him off to the Apple store to pitch a fit about his phone being completely fucked. Maybe he'll come back with a freebie G3?

    1. Re:iPhone Rendered Usless by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      My guess is that his phone is fine. It probably got updated, but can't connect to the activation servers to get re-activated. All the rumor sites are saying to not update until Apple gets their activation servers in order so that you can re-activate post update.

    2. Re:iPhone Rendered Usless by sexconker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Free? Apple?

      He'll come back after getting a free widening of his anus and lightening of his wallet.

    3. Re:iPhone Rendered Usless by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

      For once, I find myself saying 'believe the rumour sites'.

      Did anyone seriously expect the launch would go without a hiccup? True, Apple's servers have buckled surprisingly early, but everyone knew that there was no way there'd be enough iPhones to go around on the first day.

      That said, it's interesting to see there's no reports of iPhone-related violence, a la PS3/Xbox 360. Perhaps those running Unix on their devices are simply more civilised.

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  33. iPhone in Canada by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    Thanks to some shockingly incompetent marketing by the local carrier (Rogers), I shall be ignoring the iPhone for the forseeable future.

    Reading between the lines, Apple aren't amused either. Nevertheless, there were the usual legions of fanboys lining up to get them, only to find out that the available stock was ludicrously low and the entire national supply of iPhones sold out in an hour.

    I'm still hoping, some day, to be able to build applications for my iPod Touch...

    ...laura

    1. Re:iPhone in Canada by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Thanks to the iPhone, and everything made by Apple, being shit, I will be ignoring it, and everything made by Apple.

    2. Re:iPhone in Canada by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Thanks to the iPhone, and everything made by Apple, being shit, I will be ignoring it, and everything made by Apple.

      Don't let the CTRL-ALT-DELETE keys hit you on the way out.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:iPhone in Canada by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's CTRL+SHIFT+ESCAPE.

  34. Copy & Paste by novafluxx · · Score: 1

    As a current BlackBerry user who tried the iPhone for 4 days before returning it earlier this year. I have to say, I wish this thing had copy and paste! Its an essential feature for me at least. If it had c&p and video capabilities, I'd jump all over it as the uber phone everyone claims it to be. However, lacking these features that my [cheaper at the time] 8310 can deliver me is a turn off.

    1. Re:Copy & Paste by swb · · Score: 1

      I thought it was funny that Windows Mobile doesn't have C&P either.

      Regardless of what the iPhone can do, it doesn't have a physical keyboard, so I'm not interested. The on-screen keyboard doesn't accomodate me very well from the versions I've tried.

    2. Re:Copy & Paste by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I thought it was funny that Windows Mobile doesn't have C&P either.

      What? Of course it has cut/copy/paste.

    3. Re:Copy & Paste by swb · · Score: 1

      My Black Mototola Q doesn't. Although I think its stuck on WM5 due to Verizon.

    4. Re:Copy & Paste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Mobile SmartPhone edition (also called Standard edition) doesn't have cut/copy/paste. It also thinks you want to view your Sent Items in Outlook by sender.

    5. Re:Copy & Paste by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      This is it! I've had it!

      No copy / paste? In version 2? I thought it was something they just forgot about in 1.0, but this has to be a more serious issue. What is it? Battery life? Copyright violations? Java?

      I'm giving up. I'm just going to duct tape my Motorola L6 and my Palm T|X together and call it a day.

      Friggin communists.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Copy & Paste by prockcore · · Score: 1

      That's weird. My HTC Apache (originally running WM5, now running a custom WM6 rom) has cut&paste. I'm guessing that's because it has a touchscreen. Sounds like WM5 without touchscreen doesn't have cut&paste.

  35. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was going to buy an iPhone 2 but my friend's mother's brother's cousin said that his kid knows someone who works for Apple and he said the iPhone 3 should be out by Christmas. So everyone buying the iPhone 2 is getting suckered.

  36. It begs for a cell user bill of rights by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Expose the full minimum costs (including taxes) for the deal over its life
    2. Provide overnight replacement of defective phones, and have remote diagnostics to prove it
    3. Bogus charges of moisture sensors should be grounds for no-fault contract termination
    4. No charge for instant termination if your bill is paid on time
    5. Full backup of user data services at no charge at the carrier on-line
    6. No extra charges for text, data, or voice (they're all the same anyway)
    7. User-selected least-call-cost routing
    8. Users can put any app on their phone they want, so long as they take responsibility for it
    9. No throttling of service by type; all user controlled.
    10. User password-controlled kill switches to brick stolen phones
    11. One single mini-USB jack for charging purposes and sub-mini audio plug standard on all phones
    12. No charges for directly uploading and downloading any media or datafiles to the phone within its capacity
    13. Destroy all 'deals' between phone vendors and carriers; reveal the true cost of using all services on each contract
    14. Allow treble damages for carrier slamming
    15. Mandate unbundled deals, so that true costs can be assessed by consumers

    Cell phones need to leave the telco world and enter the computer world.
    Ok. Whew. I'll get off my soapbox. Now for the barrage.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by putzin · · Score: 1

      Oh, that would be wonderful. However, since Congress hasn't passed a law in favor of the consumer in decades, it's not likely. This would really piss off carriers and phone providers who couldn't care one whit about consumers.

      Also, if you had one stop kill switches, jealousy would be bricking phones on a fairly regular basis.

      --
      Bah
    2. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Maybe a key, like Yubico, or a credit card or a combo could do the remote bricking. Imagine: teenagers out of control.... no-wait.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    3. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0

      2. Provide overnight replacement of defective phones, and have remote diagnostics to prove it

      Overnight is excessive, I don't think they should be held to that. You can go a day without a phone, you won't die.

      3. Bogus charges of moisture sensors should be grounds for no-fault contract termination

      Huh?

      10. User password-controlled kill switches to brick stolen phones

      Customer support nightmare, even with the password. You can ask for a universal locking feature, so you can remotely lock the phone and the thief can't get access to the data, but bricking it is asking for trouble.

      14. Allow treble damages for carrier slamming

      Huh?

      Ok, I agree with most of your points, except the two I don't understand (treble damages? Are you just making shit up?) and the ones that are simply excessive burdens on the phone company. I'm not holding my breath, though...

    4. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      As regards #2, they have to be held to the fire, otherwise they'll let inventory drops and other lame excuses cause lots of pain for people that really need their phones as they have no landlines

      As regards #3, there are bogus moisture detectors on phones. Google it.

      As regards #10, locking and bricking are the same things. Remote locks are important to prevent bogus use charges and the black market for hot phones.

      As regards #14, treble means triple damages for carrier slamming and other inter-carrier FUs. Predatory conversions of phones ought to additionally entail jail time for the CEO.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    5. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most ridiculous series of rights I have seen,
      * no deals means phones that are cost prohibitive,
      * user password controlled kill switches is asking for people to accidentally brick their phones constantly
      * full backup of services? that's going to happen on a carrier level haha.
      * Overnight replacement of phone? Yeah providers would do that for what reason again? Do you expect your laptop computer to be replaced overnight?

      This list is coming from someone who doesnt understand how businesses are willing to compromise with customers.

    6. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by seriesrover · · Score: 1
      mmm...interesting but a few problems surely?

      1) You should already know the cost per month of what the provider charges. But how can taxes be included - they could change over the course of the contract and this is something the Government is responsible for, not the provider. If the Government isn't clear on these taxes (calculation or display) its the Governments fault - not the responsibility of the provider surely?

      2) Unlikely you could really prove it, especially remotely.

      4) Why? Its a contract - that means you agree to set of stipulations if the provider does. Don't like it, then don't agree. Besides the cost of the phones are subsidized by the length of the contract.

      5) No extra charge eh? Sure why not.

      6) True in one sense, for data throughput...but the cost of moving the data is just one factor - there is a case to be made for infrastructure of those services. I see it a bit like taxes...the more you earn the higher the *rate*. So this would be a flat tax so to speak - not that I'd complain.

      8) Would be nice...but what if users dont take responsibility? Whos to judge if an app is 'good' or 'bad'? The internet, as grand as it is, is infested with malware and viruses. Lets avoid those with the cell phone network as much as possible.

      11) Well USB is the current standard but what if it changed, or something better came along?

      Anyway, nice idea...but with almost all of your points the overall cost will go up - as much as one may not like AT&T \ Verizon \ whoever they still have to make money, and at a margin that pleases stockholders.

    7. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0

      Ugh, your clarifications aren't any better than the original.

      As regards #2, they have to be held to the fire, otherwise they'll let inventory drops and other lame excuses cause lots of pain for people that really need their phones as they have no landlines

      Then their required turn-around should be the same as with faulty lineline phones, which, I can guarantee you, is not currently same-day or overnight. Not unless you're an emergency room or disaster shelter.

      As regards #3, there are bogus moisture detectors on phones. Google it.

      Ok, assume there are... so what? What makes them "bogus?" Do you mean phone companies install fake moisture detectors? What would a fake moisture even be, just a sticker reading "LOOK THIS IS A MOISTURE DETECTOR!" on the casing somewhere? What would the point of a phone company doing that be?

      Why are fake moisture detectors an issue? Would real ones be better? In short, what exactly is point number 3, again?

      As regards #10, locking and bricking are the same things. Remote locks are important to prevent bogus use charges and the black market for hot phones.

      No they aren't; bricking would permanently destroy the data on the phone. Bricking would be writing garbage into the phone's Flash/storage to make it completely unusable. If you mean locking, say locking-- don't say "bricking".

      (Locking would simply be encrypting all the data on the phone, making it inaccessible to anybody except the original owner. The difference is that a bricked phone couldn't be re-sold, as it would just be a useless chunk of plastic, while a locked phone could potentially be wiped and re-sold by the thief.)

      As regards #14, treble means triple damages for carrier slamming and other inter-carrier FUs.

      1) No it doesn't: http://www.answers.com/treble&r=67
      2) Now I don't know what an FU is. It doesn't help to "explain" a term by giving an even more confusing term.
      3) While we're at it, I have no clue what "carrier slamming" is.

      Predatory conversions of phones ought to additionally entail jail time for the CEO.

      What is "predatory conversion of phones?"

      You'd do a much better job of convincing people if you showed some capacity for speaking plain English. You can't sell your points when you can't even *explain* your points clearly.

    8. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      No customers==no stockholders. They're monopolies, and bribers of legislators and presidents, IMHO.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    9. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      #1 means troubleshooting a lot of equipment, usually not the CPE. The cellphone in this case IS the CPE.

      #3 do your own research. Bogus moisture detectors aid carriers ability to needlessly void warranties, IMHO

      #10, we disagree. A bricked phone can be rejuvenated, just like a locked one. The difference is only the degree of difficulty. You're mincing words.

      #14 1. treble damages? Why don't you ask a real source? TRIPLE
      2. FU == fuck ups, my apologies if you're faint of obscenity
      3. See the research again, as in do some.

      I speak plain English. I'm not trying to sell my points to those incapable of understanding the subject matter, yet insist on arguing its points, lacking the context. But this is slashdot. We are all kinds, and no offense to you, but I'll bet you're having trouble understanding all of this because you aren't a follower of tech subjects, at least in this area. Good luck.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    10. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by seriesrover · · Score: 1
      No customers==no stockholders.

      Not sure of your point here. There have plenty of customers *without* a cell phone bill of rights.

      They're monopolies, and bribers of legislators and presidents, IMHO.

      Yeah and so? Whats that got to do with a cell phone bill of rights? At the end of the day your suggestions would involve a massive increase in operating costs. Then one of two things would happen; (1) they pass that cost onto the customer, the cell phone usage plummits, providers then remove the unncessary services (like video etc.) and introduce other cost cutting measures, and the industry nose dives. Or (2), they eat it the costs, profits go down, shareholders leave to put their money in an industry that yields better profit. Both ways involve a cut in services, a cut in coverage (to recoup costs) and less investment in new technologies.

      No one is saying providers are squeaky clean mary poppins types, but to slap those list of "what they should do" would be suicide.

    11. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0

      #1 means troubleshooting a lot of equipment, usually not the CPE. The cellphone in this case IS the CPE.

      What's a CPE!? Stop making shit up and type English, this is really pissing me off. I think you're doing it on purpose. Or you're an alien from Venus.

      #3 do your own research. Bogus moisture detectors aid carriers ability to needlessly void warranties, IMHO

      YHO isn't good enough if you're going to make a "bill of rights." If you're incapable of justifying this point, or even explaining it, why would anybody listen to you?

      #14 1. treble damages? Why don't you ask a real source? TRIPLE

      Ok, let's say normal human beings say the word "treble" to mean "triple." Even though they don't, but I'll throw you a bone since you're obviously from Venus or somewhere. That still doesn't explain what the hell "carrier slamming" is. Again, if you can't even explain what you mean, why the hell should I bother to seriously consider it?

      I speak plain English.

      Venusian English, maybe.

      I'm not trying to sell my points to those incapable of understanding the subject matter, yet insist on arguing its points, lacking the context.

      I own a cellphone. What more context should I need when discussing a "cellphone bill of rights?" If you can't explain a cellphone bill of rights to people who belong in the class "own a cellphone," just give up right now and join the YMCA or something.

      We are all kinds, and no offense to you, but I'll bet you're having trouble understanding all of this because you aren't a follower of tech subjects, at least in this area.

      So stop being an asshole, making up bullshit acronyms every sentence, and EXPLAIN IT TO ME. You know, like a person who speaks plan English.

    12. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Your anger is your problem.

      CPE stands for Customer Premises Equipment.

      Treble damages are triple damages.

      If you're on Slashdot, and you're ostensibly a nerd, you need a vocabulary improvement, as well as one with manners, although manners are optional here.

      If you can't speak the language, don't abuse me, improve your vocabulary.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    13. Re:It begs for a cell user bill of rights by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      When organizations lose customers, their revenues go down, as does their share price. Look at Sprint for directions, here.

      A cell phone bill of rights confers status on those poor schleps, us. We're the one that has to put up with boorish practices. The operating costs are absorbed by us anyway, why not make them open rather than hidden, and favor good customer relations and customer retention rather than the crap we must face now? Many people have become so hardened to bad and monopolistic practices that they've forgotten what good service is like. Find me a cell carrier that makes customers smile these days. I dare you.

      There is no suicide, maybe a revolution in good, open, honest relationships between phone makers, carriers, service providers, and the ALL IMPORTANT CUSTOMER, rather than enslaving the customer. As a sage once said, you get more flies with honey than vinegar.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  37. check this link by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    https://www.wireless.att.com/business/authenticate/

    for me its about 20% off service, but it varies with whatever organization you are assocaited with. If I can get 20% off the iphone service plan that would be a pretty nice deal.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    1. Re:check this link by maxume · · Score: 1

      Oh, I fully believe that AT&T has a premier customer program. I was having fun with the fact that your comment pretty much only served to tell everyone that you were in it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  38. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by sexconker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Liquid damage?
    You mean when they take your phone in the back to "check it", bring it back a few seconds later and show you a red dot under your batter cover?

    They routinely put water on the dot (which is white) and bring it back to you saying "liquid damage, no warranty, buy a new one, get a new contract, too".

    Same goes for laptops.
    "Liquid damage" is the go-to scam.

  39. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by MattW · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your friend is wrong. Even people not eligible for ugprade can get the iphone at the middle price ($400/500).

    The subsidized price is available when you are eligible for an upgrade; just like any subsidized phone - if you lose it, you pay an unsubsidized price. AT&T has a freaky offer of a non-contract iphone at $600/700, but it makes no sense to buy it, since the ETF is the same or less than the cost differential.

  40. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by dave420 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the US, but in Europe that's unheard of. Over here at least, your contract is seperate from your phone. As long as you keep your contract for the minimum number of months required, it doesn't matter what happens to the phone. You can lose your phone and let your insurance buy you a new one, and your contract will still cover it. My guess is iPhones are going to be ripped off massively ('idiot bauble' syndrome), and they're doing all they can to make it less appealing to "lose" one and get a replacement. Even so, pricey phones over here don't command such ridiculous caveats.

  41. Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by Miladinoski · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean seriously, you buy a phone and then you need to go home and activate it through some software?

    What if I don't run Windows nor Mac?

    I mean, Apple, cmmon ..
    That means that obligates me to have a computer running the OS you choose. Or installing another OS just for activating it.

    What's next?
    Will I be obliged to have 4 gigs RAM to move my pics to the PC's hard disk?

    P.S. I know I could just go to a friend and activate the phone, but will you just go to his house to use his computer and you have your own at home?

    --
    [insert lame sig here]
    1. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The iPhone is for a special kind of people. You aren't those people.

      You need to be special.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      >>What if I don't run Windows nor Mac?

      Do the math in your head quick to determine:

      a-cost of *nix port with support for god-knows how many distros running on who know what kind of hardware
      b-profit (fixed, same as before)
      c-number of *nix-ONLY users who want an iphone for some reason

      Multiply b and c. If that value is less than a, then you're not getting your linux itunes.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    3. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I mean seriously, you buy a phone and then you need to go home and activate it through some software?

      What if I don't run Windows nor Mac?

      An iPod also requires a Windows or Mac computer and that hasn't stopped Apple from becoming the #1 consumer device making company in the world by selling them. If you don't already have a Windows or Mac computer, you probably don't need a smartphone or an iPod.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by Miladinoski · · Score: 1

      That was totally not my point, my point was why do you have to activate a phone you bought through a software application on a computer. Please correct me if I'm wrong but, this maybe is the first phone I that requires that.
      I mean, there are lots of great phones out there that don't need "activation", just put in the SIM card, turn on the phone (if its charged ofc.) and you're ready to go!
      So, all in all, I want to say a computer shouldn't be required for the most basic of functions of the phone to work (hey, its a phone - its used to dial numbers).

      --
      [insert lame sig here]
    5. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      ok, i gotcha now.

      I wonder if the iphone can dial 911 before it's activated. i thought that was a requirement for all cellphones- that they can dial emergency numbers even without a sim inserted.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    6. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obligated to ahve more then 16K of RAM.
      Those bastards!

      What next, complaining about there not being a BeOS version if iTunes?

      I kid, I mean I went down to get a new Lamborghini, and I had to use it on a road someone else chose for me! I had to stay to one side and everything!

      Fortunately for me, I realized I don't have to buy one and left, to bad the same can't be said for the iPhone~

    7. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by dindi · · Score: 1

      Huhh, I am obviously as much of a rebel "linux/bsd/whatever" user as you.

      But unlike you I own an iphone, and know that you can activate without iTunes.

      Now if you ask me if I wanted one and paid for one and got suckered into AT&T: no. A web project paid me for it (iphone format site ="web app"), and I jail-broken it to use it in Costa Rica.

      If you are such a rebel, probably soon you will learn, that by owning a Mac (with OSX), you can drop windows (or run it via Parallels or VmWare or dual boot), and you will get a perfect UNIX computer with a desktop that actually works, and an OS that actually HAS DRIVERS for most of the things you need to "HACK" (or cry for) for weeks on Linux.

      Do I hate linux? Perfect for the server, no thanks anymore for my desktop. I want to get stuff done other than figuring out why X crashed and has no driver for my new card.

      You want an iphone? Get a mac or windows.

      The again, no offense; I spent days, nights, weeks doing stuff, hacking my drivers and all. Was very useful, and I can do many things most admins cannot on a linux box, but I need to get work done without the constant DICKING around fixing shit. So I got a Macbook and a Mini Mac. They were my best ever hardware purchase.

      Iphone: yeah it is fine. My Nokia has 5x the functions (E565), cost more, and guess what: I hate it because the interface is from the last century, and when I try to type an URL it takes me 5x the time. So yes. I love my iphone, and my Macs.

      Why ? As a programmer and admin(with multiple clients) I suffer enough solving CRAP, so I want systems that work with a slick interface.

      OK, had a busi programming/meeting/fixing week, adn I am past my 2nd vodka-redbull ...

      Cheers and no offense, just do not be an ass, there are folks out there who are not morons and like *nix systems. BTW the iphone is based on BSD, so get one and you can rebel even more!

    8. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      A. Isn't wine at 1.0 release level?
      B. Quitchabitchen.

      --Toll_Free

    9. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by jadedoto · · Score: 1

      ...umm... GTKPod? It works perfectly with my 3rd gen nano...

    10. Re:Apple, cut the BS with iTunes by jimmyharris · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like the iPhone version 1 (and I'm guessing it's exactly the same), then yes, it can dial emergency numbers without having a SIM or being activated.

  42. lines long BECAUSE of sync issues by MattW · · Score: 1

    One reason the lines are long in the first place is the sync issues. The activation server is timing out (probably from load). If it was being prompt, people would be out the door in a fraction of the time.

  43. Still missing way too much functionalty by defaria · · Score: 0

    Apple cannot even manage to get simple things like Bluetooth Stereo headsets to work and copy and paste. The masses turning into Apple fanboys - it's sickening...

  44. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

    Or you could just tell them you'll pay the early exit fee, cancel your service and find a new phone provider (no bluffing - must follow through). I did that once for a different situation and they backed down promptly. But YMMV.

  45. iPhone in Britain by Andy_R · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You think your lot are shockingly incompetent, try our lot. Their authentication software is just a basic form filling thing, barely more than a web page, but it requires IE. Applestore staff are really enjoying having to cobble together an emulation solution today as nobody realised that IE for Mac was killed off years ago, especially when they found out that the back end software is as stable as a dizzy stiltwalker in a ball bearing factory.

    Meanwhile I'm not even in an Apple store as O2 randomly decreed that existing customers can only upgrade at O2 stores. I should have been able to upgrade online and have the phone delivered, but despite sending me 3 mails saying I'd successfully ordered online, and debiting my credit card, O2 randomly decided I wasn't getting one, and the estimated delivery date was 'hopefully by the end of Summer'. The idea of reserving the a phone for me at the shop, or couriering one from the shop to me was for no readily apparent reason unthinkable, so I decided to queue at the shop. I was 11th in line. After making a grand total of 3 sales in the first hour after opening, the staff decided to switch to filling in the paperwork offline, which slowed them down to just 2 completed sales in the 2nd hour.

    At about this point, they finally realised that some people in the 100 strong queue would not get one of the 30 phones they had in stock. They counted the 16Gb phones, and gave the first 12 people in the queue a yellow post it note that designated us as the lucky ones to get the big memory version. Then they took the 12th post it away, having discovered that their counting abilities matched their organisational abilities. Purple post its for the 8Gbs followed, and the back two thirds of the queue were told they were out of luck, and had waited over 2 hours for no reason.

    Five minutes later, they noticed the *other* box of iPhones, and handed out more post-its to people who had only just arrived and joined the back of the queue (of course it didn't occur to staff to stop people joining the queue after the first batch of phones were all accounted for). After much arguing they finally stopped trying to allocate the newly found 16s to the newcomers and swapped purple post its for yellows. Several staff genuinely couldn't understand why people who had queued for hours and been told they could only have an 8 were angry that people who arrived 5 mins ago were getting first dibs on the second lot of 16s. One just kept repeating 'but you've been allocated an 8' over and over.

    After nearly 3 hours, I was the 11th person to leave the store with a phone. I expect the store won't sell out today, because they had about 40 left, and only 9 hours before closing time.

    My activation worked just fine though :-)

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:iPhone in Britain by replicant108 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The strangest thing of all is that you paid them to treat you like that.

  46. Will it Blend? by RobBebop · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    you will 1. Have to pay full price to get a new one (not too surprising imo) and 2. Re-sign up for a 2 year contract

    I assume the same would apply if the iPhone 2 were dropped into the BlendTec?

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  47. Nice phone. To bad you can't actually get one. by nsayer · · Score: 1

    By my reckoning, the AT&T store at Keily & El Camino Real had fewer than 70 of the 160 GB model in each color.

    The last launch went reasonably well - everyone who got in line before the actual launch (which started 20 minutes late) got the phone of their choice.

    This time, I got there an hour and a half early and they ran out 6 people ahead of me.

    I wouldn't have actually minded that if they'd have told us all that at the start instead of having us waste 3 hours of our lives waiting. They had to have known how many they had available last night. They couldn't have gone down the line at 8 and counted them off?

    1. Re:Nice phone. To bad you can't actually get one. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If they do that, it stops being an event and becomes a line.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Nice phone. To bad you can't actually get one. by nsayer · · Score: 1

      If they do that, it stops being an event and becomes a line.

      Yes, a potential riot of very, very angry people certainly is an event, alright.

  48. WHAT THE FUCK KIND OF CUSTOMER SERVICE IS THIS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    F this.

    I have an iPhone 2G phone. I updated this morning and ever since it deactivated itself and I have been without a phone the entire day. The Apple store tells me they are too busy selling new phones to service existing customers.

    WHAT THE FUCK KIND OF CUSTOMER SERVICE IS THIS?

  49. iPhone 3g - Keyboard options / DVORAK? by dynamo · · Score: 1

    Hey, someone who has one or access to one - please tell me if my one dealbreaker issue is fixed.

      Is dvorak one of the new available keyboard layouts?

    note {
        Yes, I know it's possible to hack an old-style
        iPhone to use dvorak by messing with another
        layout file. My question is whether it's
        available WITHOUT having to jailbreak / hack it.
    )

    If not, it's really ironic that the only keyboards Apple makes that can't be easily re-arranged to your liking are software-based.

    1. Re: iPhone 3g - Keyboard options / DVORAK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could use a keyboard layout like everybody else.

      Sorry, but the Dvorak myth makes me want to pull my hair out.

    2. Re: iPhone 3g - Keyboard options / DVORAK? by dynamo · · Score: 1

      Pull your hair out then.

      If you want to call it a myth then it's probably not for you - but it works a hell of a lot better for me. I *need* to be able to type for my job, not to mention argue on slashdot, and a point came where my fingers started hurting so much with QWERTY that I was going to have to find another way to make a living. Switching to DVORAK stopped the hurting. I'm probably faster too but that's waaay secondary.

  50. So can the original iPhone go down in price? by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    I've been looking to buy an iPhone, will this mean the original iPhone will start to go down in price?

  51. Just to recap... by IrrepressibleMonkey · · Score: 1

    So...

    AT&T are screwing Americans, Rogers are screwing Canadians.

    The iPhone 3G doesn't have cut & paste, MMS, replaceable battery or a physical keyboard.

    The iPhone camera isn't as good as a number of other camera-phones. Some would say it's outright poor - I've not really ever used by k800i...

    Is there anything new to say? Did anyone read the article and find out something new?

    Personally, I'm miffed that the white 16GB iPhone aren't available in the UK yet. When they are, I'll get one. The O2 tariffs are not bad, not good. The product offers the best mobile internet experience on a phone that I've seen.

    But it's just a phone, right?

  52. Country, carrier? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine works for a company selling the iPhone 2.

    Give us a clue to which country this carrier is in. There are many more carriers this time round and they don't all smell the same.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  53. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by Space+cowboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Funny, I had almost that exact experience at the San Jose Apple store - the guy took it into the back to "check it", and came back to the desk.

    Then he said, "yes, it's broken" (it couldn't play H.264 video properly, everything else worked) and gave me a new one there and then. That one's worked perfectly since :)

    Perhaps yours have had liquid damage ?

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  54. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Never happened to mine.

    It's a well known scam.

  55. Already installed the iPhone 2.0 software by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting



    I downloaded an earlier version of the iPhone 2.0 software and installed it on my iPhone yesterday. Works great and I've spent a lot of time in the app store. Here are my observations:

    1. AolRadio is an amazing offering. Within wifi zones, it offers a ton of digital radio stations that blow my Sirius satellite subscription out of the water- better music offerings and for free. It supposedly works to some extent over 3g, while not offering ALL stations. So it makes the iPhone a cool portable internet radio player.

    2. eReader is an ebook reader that's free, but it only allows you to install books purchased from their website. For $9.99 you can purchase an app called 'bookshelf' that lets you install your own ebooks, and supports multiple formats. It doesn't currently support PDF, but I assume it will.

    3. Most of the good games are not free or cheap. Super Monkey Ball is $9.99.

    4. Weatherbug is an app similar to the original weather APP, but it offers radar views and current condition photos. The radar would be excellent, but it doesn't automatically zoom in to the city you are interested in. At least one other feature on it seems incomplete.

    Seth

  56. iTunes seems to be working now by Kostya · · Score: 1

    I updated my iPhone around 11 and it was down right up till the time I had to go pick a friend up from the airport. I just tried right now and the activation step went through without a hitch.

    So the iTunes storm seems to be over. I wonder if it was iTunes or iTunes-to-AT&T that was the problem. I seem to remember AT&T's systems was the bottleneck at the launch. I know the computers at the store I was at were crawling and barely able to keep up.

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
  57. No Tethering... Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AT&T even sells other phones that can tether, but does a tethering-allowed data plan cost more? I believe it was technically not allowed on my old t-mobile account, even though I tethered my PowerBook to my Nokia 6600 on GPRS.

  58. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by konohitowa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yeah. Everyone knows it. It's one of those scams perpetrated by them. I know for sure, because I get on email on the internets that told me about a guy whose cousin knows this girl who has a friend that does exactly that every day.

    Man I hate them.

  59. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by vux984 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Liquid damage?
    You mean when they take your phone in the back to "check it", bring it back a few seconds later and show you a red dot under your batter cover?

    A reputable dealer will flip it open and remove the battery cover right in front of you to check that dot with you.

    The red dots in my experience with cellular has been a pretty accurate predictor. And in virtually every red dot case I've ever seen, when at the customers insistence that they've never been anywhere near moisture ever and at their expense we've had our service technicians open the unit -- significant corrosion was invariably plain to see.

    A phone can be sopping without getting dunked. An unlucky drop or two on the ground, or not putting the battery cover on properly and the water proofing can easily be compromised. Once that's the case, water vapor and humitity from being left in a pocket on the counter while you take a hot shower, or on a windowsill at night... etc... and the inside of the phone will be full of condensation, which rapidly turns in it into a useless paperweight.

    All that said, I wouldn't doubt a disreputable dealer might do what you describe.

    If you genuinely suspect a scam, take the device someplace reputable, and have them check the actual electronics -- if they are bone dry and free of corrosion, you have a lawsuit on your hands.

    But don't be surprised if the insides come back looking like they spent a week at the bottom of a lake.

  60. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what prevents anyone from buying dozens of phones and sticking em under one contract after losing them once a day ?
    1. buy iphone 2 with contract
    2. lose it on ebay for $350
    3. buy new iphone and stick it under same contract for $199
    4. PROFIT !!!

  61. Won't help by pluther · · Score: 1

    It might be worthwhile to do that if you're going to another carrier. But AT&T's standard unlimited data plan is $40/mo. The regular iPhone's is cheaper.

    --
    If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    1. Re:Won't help by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      It might be worthwhile to do that if you're going to another carrier. But AT&T's standard unlimited data plan is $40/mo. The regular iPhone's is cheaper.

      Nope. The old iPhones got the equivalent data plan to the smartphone plan, not the $40/mo Blackberry/handheld plan. The only difference between the two is that the $20/mo iPhone/smartphone plan doesn't give the phone a public routed IP no.

      -b.

  62. I need no frigging computer or software .... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... to activate other phones.

    So try again genius.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:I need no frigging computer or software .... by petehead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I need no frigging computer or software...to activate other phones.

      I'd mod you up if I could. The point is not that you need activation, the point is that Apple isn't letting AT&T do it and is requiring that the consumer get iTunes and do it themselves at home. Add that to the fact that iTunes is required to get 3rd party apps and you can see how Apple is using the iphone to further shoehorn their way onto the desktop.

    2. Re:I need no frigging computer or software .... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You don't need one to activate the iPhone 2. It can be done in store.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:I need no frigging computer or software .... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I bunch of people I know got one this after noon, all of them were activated when they left the store.

      How do other devices get third party apps on their phones?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:I need no frigging computer or software .... by chill · · Score: 1

      Apparently not today it can't. Not for a lot of people.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    5. Re:I need no frigging computer or software .... by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      You are misinformed. Apple *is* letting AT&T do it; iPhones are activated at the store like all other phones now. You are not required to use iTunes. However, the activation servers are broken today, so AT&T is giving people the *option* of buying one now and activating it at home, instead of not being able to buy one at all after waiting in line for hours.

      Furthermore iTunes is also not required to get third party apps; you can download them directly from the App Store onto your iPhone over 3G, Edge, or WiFi. You also don't need iTunes to sync PIM data; you can get that over the air from Exchange or Mobile Me. iTunes is now only required if you want to back up your phone, load your personal MP3 collection, or update your firmware yourself.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  63. Sorta OT but not by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

    Why is that, do you think? There seems to be something about cities in Arizona that makes the residents, um, different. I've heard every big city around there described, in terms of culture, as "Los Angeles with none of the redeeming features".
    Why is this not OT? Because in some ways the old joke really is true. California is the future. And if we're going to look at future demand for things like gadgets, then what y'all want is disproportionately important to help determine what users everywhere will want in ten years or so.
    So, that having been said, please, can you explain to me why Arizona people are the way that they are?

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
  64. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but why do they design mobile phones so shittily? Isn't it a scam?

    I could understand with the first generation, but by now, don'tcha think they ought to have figured out a way to get a waterproof seal over the battery when you close the lid??? I think it's pathetic.

  65. I hate to say this... by filthpickle · · Score: 1

    because I really like their business model. But I had Cricket and it really, really sucked. I never got more than 2 bars anywhere, text messaging would act just plain weird at times (would send the same message twice, would receive the same message twice, and sometimes it would take HOURS between when I sent a message and when the person I sent it to got it). Also, the phone I got thru them was a complete piece of garbage. I had sprint before

    If you have had a good experience with them, please reply stating so. I don't want to bash them, this was just my experience with them.

    1. Re:I hate to say this... by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      I have been with them for several years now. Inside the city, I have no problems with the service. my text messages work just fine (I get replies from my Uncle on AT&T before I can remove my tumb off of send, so he must get to him fast enough). But, I don't have the free phone. I have the Motorola SLVR L7.

      My (Ex) Girlfriend has T-Mobile. She has had more issues with her service this year, then I have had in years. That is to say, not receiving/sending text mesages.

      Thankfully they are starting ot branch out more, and I can use my phone when I travel to Denver and (hopeully) Las Vegas. I have not tested out their service in Vegas yet, or the roaming service for when your outside of the city. I whole heartedly believe that their will be tons of issues with functionaility while roaming.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  66. Sounds like you need a hug by jamrock · · Score: 1

    When will the loyal fans finally say "ENOUGH!"

    I guess they will when they're genuinely unhappy with Apple's products and services. Despite missteps and mistakes on Apple's part, it doesn't appear that the vast majority of their customers are anywhere close to unhappy with either.

    And out of curiosity, why would you say that the price of the original iPhone was a rip-off? People who spent the $600 didn't have guns pressed to their temples, and obviously it was worth it to them or they wouldn't have bought them. The only early adopters I've heard bitching about the price drop were the ones who had bought a bunch of them in order to resell them, and saw their money-making venture evaporate (I personally know several). Those who found the device useful just shrugged their shoulders, joked about Early Adopters Syndrome, and happily continued using it (I personally know many).

    If you think the iPhone is such a rip-off, why are you so upset that you couldn't get one on launch day? Couldn't you have foreseen the possibility of the very problems that you encountered, and put off your purchase until next week, when the bugs were ironed out? Seems to me that you're really upset about the inconveniences you suffered and decided to vent by launching into a rant fest. What does the iPod battery, iPod Touch upgrade fees, and Edge performance have to do with the fact that you didn't get your iPhone today? Your post makes you sound like a frustrated fanboy, lashing out at Apple because you didn't get your toy like Unca Steve promised. There, there, it's not the end of the world.

  67. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by vux984 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, but why do they design mobile phones so shittily? Isn't it a scam?

    I could understand with the first generation, but by now, don'tcha think they ought to have figured out a way to get a waterproof seal over the battery when you close the lid??? I think it's pathetic.

    Actually back in the old days I saw a Motorola 2-way unit sitting in a fishbowl at a tradeshow. People could come up use it, and then put it back in the fishbowl. Its not that they can't make them waterproof... its that they can't make them water proof, feature rich, light, 4 millimeters thick, stays cool while you use it, and on top of all that cheap.

    Most cellphones are actually quite water reistant, and I've seen countless survive drink spills, and even falls into sinks and worse. But the engineering tradeoffs mean most are still fairly vulnerable. You -can- get waterproof phones though... manufacturers do make units designed to survive immersion... Sony, LG, Fujitsu and others have all released waterproof models. And for the rest, there is a thriving market for waterproof cases.

    And its not just the battery cover... the keypad, buttons, charging port, along with the hinges and slides of phones that do that -- are all potential entrances. There are membranes and coatings in place - and the better devices -are- fairly resistant, but if you want water 'proof' you'll have to make some tradeoffs, and the market despite its moaning about liquid damage doesn't exactly snap up the water proof options that are available.

  68. Unlocked in Begium by houghi · · Score: 1

    The iPhone 2 is for sale in Belgium for 525EUR afor the 8GB nd 615EUR for the 16GB version.

    At this moment it is forbidden by law to sell them locked and with a contract. This means that Apple has pumped up the price a bit, so it can show how good it would be to have it locked and so on like in other countries.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  69. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine works for a company selling the iPhone 2. According to him if you lose your iPhone 2 you will 1. Have to pay full price to get a new one (not too surprising imo) and 2. Re-sign up for a 2 year contract... Also according to him the employees have been instructed specifically to not mention this fact to customers. Pretty screwy to me. Then again I am ignorant of how most cell phones work so I don't know if this is standard or not. I'm assuming based on his reaction its not.

    Well, it sucks, but it's also the way it's worked with every single cell phone I've had for the last 11 years. Contract + Phone == subsidy to lower the cost. Unless you have your phone insured, you're going to have to pay the full price of the phone or subsidize it with a new contract.

    I'm not complaining about you in particular, but I am finding these sorts of 'red flags' to be a little annoying. Okay, the iPhone is overhyped. The substance isn't being overpowered by the flash. I think this is understood, afterall, that's why lots of people are coming forward and saying "Hmm.. this sounds better than it really is." And ya know what? They're right. But what's getting annoying (again, I'm not picking on you in particular because I'm not sensing malice in your tone.) is all these alarms are going off about things that really need to be filed under D for Duh. Here are some examples:

    - The phone's only $199, but you're stuck with a 2 year contract, so it really costs over $1500!
    - Data service isn't available everywhere!
    - Some people will have to plunk down a deposit! ... etc.

    Seriously, it's not like the vast majority of people getting an iPhone have never had a cell phone before. Let's at least keep the drawbacks that affect any other cellphone on the market to a minimum.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  70. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Oh I know the red dots work.
    They're often too sensitive, though.
    (The shower situation you described often sets them off, when very little if any damage to the actual electronics has occurred.)

    But I am literally talking about taking your phone in because it's a buggy piece of crap, handing it to the sales rep, the rep going to "check" it, coming back 1 minute later, and lo and behold that white dot you walked in with is now completely red.

    Specific example (not my phone): The Verizon store in the Paseo Nuevo shopping center in Santa Barbara, CA.

  71. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by sexconker · · Score: 0

    Sadly, I'm not exaggerating.
    It's just one more avenue they have to screw you.

    If you ever have a buggy ass piece of crap phone, and you take it in to be replaced, watch out for this shit.
    Show them up front that the water-damage indicator has not been tripped.

  72. NYC AT&T Store Scam by Aquitaine · · Score: 1

    Borderline scam, at least, as they're honest about it.

    I was riding into Manhattan today on my bicycle and thought I'd swing by a couple of AT&T stores on the way to see if any lines were short enough to get myself an iPhone (never had a 1st gen). The one on the Fulton Street Mall had a line out the door but not too long - I should've stayed there, as they were out of stock by my trip home.

    I went by the one on Montague street in Brooklyn Heights - only a few people in line. An AT&T rep came out and said that their stock was running low (this was at noon) and that they would only sell their remaining phones 'at full price' - with no guarantee that AT&T would credit you the difference, even if you then signed a 2 year contract.

    Not one person stayed in the store. It's certainly their right to sell them however they wanted, but I'll never go back to that store - seems like a pretty dumb business decision.

  73. Triple the lock-in by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong I think the iPhone is a great device and very well thought out but the iTunes + Service + On-line + Apple Services lock-in makes me very nervous. You just need one level as we are seeing now to fail and you are stuck with an very expensive brick. When I look at the iPhone the image of a very well made and gold (gilded) cage comes to mind and I really don't want to step into it.

  74. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by yzf750 · · Score: 1

    Only if they are not eligible for an upgrade. This is the case with any phone AT&T sells. If you are not eligible for an upgrade, you do not get the subsidized price.

  75. Re:To The Cocksucker Who Modded This Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right - keep burning up your mod points on ACs, faggot. Your mother still gives lousy blowjobs.

  76. Interesting Related Article by sirvulcan · · Score: 1

    http://stuff.co.nz/4610626a18335.html If you want an iphone down here in New Zealand then be prepared to pay out big. Vodafone is selling Apple's 8 gigabyte iPhone 3G from $199NZ, but to get this price customers must sign up to a 24-month plan charging $250NZ per month. The plan includes voice calls, SMS and 1GB of data per month. Other plans charge $80NZ or $130NZ per month for 250MB and 500MB respectively, with the 8GB handset costing $549NZ or $449NZ respectively. The 16GB iPhone models cost $150NZ more in each case. The iPhone in New Zealand will cost from $2469NZ to $6199NZ over two years, depending on the plan and how much is paid up front.

  77. Re:Be warned.... Don't lose your iPhone by William+Ager · · Score: 1

    If one isn't eligible for an upgrade, one can buy a phone from AT&T without renewing the contract, apparently, which makes sense. The iPhone for non-eligible customers is full price and requires a renewed contract. Considering the price difference, it could well be cheaper for me to cancel my service and pay the early termination fee in order to buy an iPhone at the subsidized price.

  78. Anyone else suspicious... by malv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That many of the highly modded pro-Apple posts all in the 2415* UID range? Looks like Slashdot may be succumbing to sneaky advertising tactics.

  79. Tethering is... by PrimalChrome · · Score: 1

    On the offchance that you're serious... Tethering is the ability to connect your device to your laptop/workstation and use its wireless for internet connectivity. That, low battery consumption, replaceable batteries, push from BES, and a tactile keyboard is what makes Blackberries better corporate devices.

  80. It Just Works by BSDetector · · Score: 0

    It just works.....

  81. ATT screwing current customers by MrOctogon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not eligible for an upgrade until next august, and the sales rep tells me I will have to pay $400 for an iphone no matter what. I thought about trying to save money by paying $175 to terminate my current plan, but then I would get screwed by the activation fee again.
    It seems pretty lame that they tricked me into getting a crappy razr for free a year ago, and now the screen doesn't even come on anymore and they tell me to suck it up or give them more money. It seems I should get the subsidized price by agreeing to extend my contract, but they just don't seem to care about their own customers at all once they get you to sign that contract. Hooray for broken capitalism!

    1. Re:ATT screwing current customers by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      The fatal truth is Contracts = Your my bitch now.

  82. Re: You lose your phone number when you do this by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    If you do the upgrade, you are forced to get a new number. Only full price buyers get to keep their old numbers.

  83. Re:More Expensive- Metro Elite Mortgage by Metro_Elite_Mortgage · · Score: 1

    absolutely. - Metro Elite Mortgage

  84. sorry apple by xmvince · · Score: 1

    guess ill be waiting for Android :)